piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2022-10-23 10:04:41+00:00): Noi Nick, 
Goed van je dat je het gewijzigd hebt!
Als je de OSMAND kaart update, dan is het daar ook weg. (normaal maandelijkse updates via OSMAND)
Ik zie dat de naam van de oude boerderij al is gewijzigd naar Klein Pardijs, dit wilde ik doen, maar hoeft niet meer.
dbaron (2020-10-12 00:09:24+00:00): I reverted one of the changes (a position of a fire hydrant) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92316390
dbaron (2020-10-12 00:16:11+00:00): I've checked that the one change I reverted was the only change in this changeset not on the campus of the California School for the Blind (and the reason the changeset's rectangle is so large).
user_2066394 (2020-05-06 20:27:00+00:00): geschlossene geschäfte idealerweise nicht komplett löschen, besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84778255
salisburymistake (2020-08-21 21:12:37+00:00): You should not be classifying private driveways and residential streets as golf cart paths. And why are all the nearby houses designated as offices? I suspect that you're mapping for a video game instead of real life, and it's creating a heck of a mess for others to clean up. Please hold off on making such drastic edits until you've acquired the necessary skill and knowledge to do them correctly.
PT-53 (2020-05-07 06:24:54+00:00): Hallo aschwege,
Du hast diesen Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800819228/history
neu eingezeichnet und mit den Merkmalen
highway=unclassified und
motor_vehicle=no
markiert.
Das paßt so nicht zusammen. Eine Unclassified-Straße die nur an Feld- bzw. Waldwege angeschlossen ist und auf der keine KFZ fahren dürfen wird es wohl nicht geben.
Bitte schau Dir mal das Wiki zu Klassifikation der Highway an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Highways
Hilfreich ist auch diese Tabelle der Access-Restrictions:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte im Änderungssatz einen neuen Kommentar erstellen.

Grüße
PT-53 (2020-05-07 06:29:11+00:00): PS: Du hast die Straße - wohl aus Versehen - als Mitglied in die Otterwald-MP-Relation aufgenommen. Das war falsch. Ich habe die Straße daher aus der Relation wieder entfernt.
PT-53 (2020-05-10 05:31:26+00:00): Hallo aschwege, 
nachdem Du nicht reagiert hast, habe ich heute den Weg wieder gelöscht.
Grüße
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 14:00:45+00:00): source: bustimes.org
markm851003 (2020-05-06 19:45:25+00:00): Permanent maxspeed here appears to be 110  but I reached a point of differing construction speed so discontinued any speed changes past this point.  I left a map note for more resources and discontinued any further edits.
Shaun das Schaf (2020-05-07 05:36:52+00:00): Hallo Fabiooqko,

die Syntax ist richtig so.

Viele Grüße,
Shaun das Schaf
eggie (2020-05-06 19:48:29+00:00): Dag kbraat..
Tip  Beter gewoon de landuse taggen. 
leisure=park is een functie die als een transparant over de landuse heen ligt van echte parken.
Niet elk stukje groen is een park al wordt het een park genoemd. 
De naam kan er uiteraard wel op. 
Gr eggie
kbraat (2020-05-06 19:52:46+00:00): ah, ok ik ga m aanpassen
mueschel (2020-05-07 07:54:49+00:00): Hallo Fabian,
du hast hier Tags wie 'symbol II' an Straßen eingetragen.
Diese Tags gibt es in dieser Form sonst nirgends. Symbole von Wanderwegen werden nicht an Straßen, sondern an den Wanderwegen selbst eingetragen, Also z.B. an https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/326108
Hier sind schon "symbol" mit einer Beschreibung und "osmc:symbol" mit einer computerlesbaren Beschreibung vorhanden.

Gruß
Jan
uvi (2020-10-31 11:07:42+00:00): Hallo Fabian, du hast hier unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11075008#map=18/50.83423/13.13975&layers=N einen "Flöhatalwanderweg" eingetragen. Das können mehrere User so nicht nachvollziehen. Ich konnte eine entsprechende Beschilderung auch nicht finden. Könntest du bitte deine Quellen offenbaren, vielleicht weißt du ja mehr. Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2375076 gibt es dazu eine enstprechende Fehlermeldung. Danke Uwe
uvi (2020-10-31 11:13:56+00:00): Vielleicht meintest du ja den Wandervorschlag auf Seite 4 hier https://www.wanderlatsch.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Wanderfuehrer_Wanderlatsch_2015.pdf ein offizieller "Flöhatalwanderweg" lässt sich daraus nicht ableiten und die Wegführung ist auch anders. VG Uwe
uvi (2020-11-01 15:32:32+00:00): ... und dann ist da noch der Fernwanderweg parallel hangaufwärts  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/326108 mit der Markerung rot-weiß-rot. Ich nehme an, dass die Eintragung des "Flöhatalweges" einfach nur ein Irrtum ist. VG Uwe
Leo Slager (2020-05-06 22:52:06+00:00): Dag kbraat,
Hier gaat iets fout.
Je hebt niet alleen de naam van het café verwijderd, maar ook een aantal kenmerken van het gebouw.
Boevendien horen de adresgegevens niet op de gebouwen. De adressen zijn net als het gebouw zelf rechtstreeks geîmporteerd van het Kadaster. De adres gegevens staan dan ook op een aparte adresnode. En daar worden de bedrijfsgegevens aan toe gevoegd.
ik verander het even.
BabsAK (2020-05-06 19:48:03+00:00): My first time with Maps.
maraf24 (2021-03-20 13:56:40+00:00): I to bardzo złe zmiany, bo tutaj nie ma czynnej synagogi.
BAK365 (2020-05-22 12:47:32+00:00): Hallo, ist das vielleicht eine Verwechslung? Weder Name noch Beschreibung passen beim "Kupfersee".
eggie (2020-05-07 06:37:42+00:00): Een lastige..voor veel startende mappers.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
Om te beginnen mag je hier geen gebruiken.
Daarnaast... Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665

Dit valt dus niet onder de definitie van een park. Wel zou je met 'micromapping'  dit kunnen mappen en zelfs Van Goghpark kunnen  noemen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-07 06:54:51+00:00): Een poging gewaagd.. Je moet maar eens kijken.
Advies .. stap over naar editor JOSM. Die biedt veel meer mogelijkheden.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-05-07 07:00:02+00:00): Wellicht is de gedenkplaat een historic = memorial ?
Kijk even bij https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
Mark R Naird (2020-05-06 20:08:11+00:00): Hi Merry,

did you knew, that you may straighten buildings by pressing "Q"?

Kind regards
Nakaner (2020-05-09 17:41:52+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe bemerkt, dass du nach meinem Revert (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84712228) erneut versucht hast, die von dir angestrebten Änderungen durchzudrücken.

hsc666 hat das mittlerweile dankenswerterweise revertiert. Bitte beachte, dass wir Editwars bei OpenStreetMap grundsätzlich nicht dulden und das Fortsetzen eines Editwars nicht mit den Grundsätzen des OpenStreetMap-Gemeinschaftsprojekts vereinbar ist (d.h. du wirst dann gesperrt).

Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=786072#p786072

Viele Grüße

Michael
aviray (2020-05-06 20:19:11+00:00): added buildings, mainly to top left corner
johsin18 (2020-05-07 09:56:23+00:00): Kleiner Tipp:
In ID kannst du nach Rechtsklick auf einen Umriss "Rechtwinklig machen" auswählen, was handgemalte Linien schön geraderückt (falls die Wände wohl rechtwinklig zueinander stehen).
ickehgw (2020-05-07 10:22:39+00:00): #weeklyfixplayground
Mark R Naird (2020-05-06 20:27:53+00:00): Dear JVO,
why do you not exclude the road areas from other landuses? Are you assuming them as "zero width"?
JVO (2020-05-06 20:48:33+00:00): because I'm lazy and the map is still 10 to 100x accurate it was before my edits. I was thinking about this the other day and technically I should probably draw the roads, then ditch going on both sides of the road line, and then surround all this with an area of shrub or grass. that is way too much effort for no real discernible map accuracy.
eggie (2020-05-06 20:38:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Krullus (2020-05-07 20:18:04+00:00): Can you stop go in and change my created geometries? i have maped from sattelite images isn't that alowed?
archie (2020-05-08 08:59:35+00:00): It dosn't work this way. I advise you to read about the principales of osm here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sv:Beginners%27_guide
Krullus (2020-05-08 09:36:29+00:00): Okey would you please tell me what I am doing wrong? I read about tracking satelite image and that is allowed https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sv:Beginners%27_guide_1.1.2
Krullus (2020-05-08 15:53:22+00:00): What I can read is that using aerial images is allowed and with aerial images you can even map geometries that better represent the reality then the older maps . I hope this is not a problem for you?
Here is a simplyfication on why things on the maps isn't that exact as you always want it to be.
here lantmäteriet talks about 
property boundaries. 
https://www.lantmateriet.se/korrektagranser
The same offcouse applies to other geometries and lantmäteriet could not update all at once even if they wanted to.  This is where osm have the upper hand because it can apply changes really quick. I hope this gives you some answer. Please don't bother me with reverting my changes if you don't have better grounds! I do thank you for the correction about the little bridge instead of a tunnel. 
Regards
Krullus
chachafish (2020-05-20 22:30:48+00:00): Hello. The path you added here crosses other paths and roads at nine different locations, but without a connecting node. Can you return here and connect these points with nodes? If you need help, I'll be happy to assist you. Also, if designate a path for bikes and pedestrians will you please add the segregated tag per the OSM wiki? Thank you https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated
normalisdesned (2020-05-17 05:08:53+00:00): Bitte zügig diesen Änderungssatz korrigieren! Du hast aus einer NEBENSTRAßE eine LINE gemacht!!!
normalisdesned (2020-05-17 05:09:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104880621
Karsten Natebus (2020-05-17 07:29:30+00:00): Hallo, ist mir schon aufgefallen. Es sind Strassen betroffen die ich der Route Chiemgau KING MTB zugeordnet habe. Warum das passiert ist, ist mir schleierhaft. Es sollten mittlerweile alle korrigiert sein.
normalisdesned (2020-05-18 05:29:35+00:00): Hallo,
Perfekt. dass du so schnell reagiert hast. Warum das passiert weiß ich auch nicht ;-)
Gruß
PT-53 (2020-08-05 07:11:11+00:00): Hallo RicoSc,
bitte schau Dir auch diese Straßen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283761173/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283761174/history
nochmal an.

OSM-Inspector:
http://tools.geofabrik.dehttp://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.04589&lat=48.40205&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways
Grüße
majkaz (2020-09-04 11:08:43+00:00): Ahoj, prosím Tě, pokud přidáváš nějaký bod jako je třeba drogerie, dej tam vedle další bod. Nedávej to do adresního bodu - blbě se s tím pak pracuje dál.
maraf24 (2020-06-01 10:08:36+00:00): Znów kasowanie nazw.
andergrin (2020-05-08 08:24:59+00:00): Якщо ви додаєте highway=track, не треба туди прописувати всі види транспорту, які можуть нею пройти, це і так передбачається таким типом дороги.
mr_miron (2020-05-08 11:42:19+00:00): ок, зрозумів..
ElliottPlack (2020-05-06 21:33:25+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78746676 for inspiration
AT0MCHILD (2020-05-06 22:04:38+00:00): I traced the tunnels to the best of my memory by literally walking through them. I’m new at adding to the open street maps, so thanks for the help with the data.
Carto'Cité (2020-05-25 19:00:20+00:00): Salut,
Pour info sur les aménagements temporaire tu n'es pas obligé de préciser spécifiquement "piste cyclable temporaire" pour la clé description:covid19. C'était sujet à une mauvaise interprétation dans le wiki alors j'ai apporté quelques informations supplémentaires. Donc il vaut mieux préciser clairement ce qui est observé sur le terrain. Pour ce way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685607772 ce serait plutôt une bande apparemment mais bon comme c'est bien mappé ce n'est pas très grave. Merci en tout cas d'avoir mis les infos :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-05-27 17:58:53+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Nassau%20Avenue%20Station?uselang=en appears to be not existing (it was added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1423440756/history in this edit)
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-08-23 02:13:26+00:00): Greetings!
One small note: what you've mapped as ford=yes here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7490631256) should rather be mapped as tunnel=culvert + layer=-1
Carnildo (2020-05-08 07:07:42+00:00): The description tag may not be for advertising, but it is for describing the location.  I see nothing promotional about the description of Montana Peterbilt.
MarvinMep (2020-05-06 22:09:36+00:00): Escrevi "edificil" por ato falho... porque às vezes é difícil lidar com certos mapeadores... =P
FarmFreshMaps (2020-05-06 22:13:01+00:00): Correction: Yandex Panorama was also used as an additional source.
skquinn (2020-05-07 01:10:39+00:00): My 15,000th changeset :-)
Glassman (2020-05-07 15:12:12+00:00): TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline, then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84787677
Mapper Z (2020-05-07 19:39:56+00:00): Wow, awesome! Thank you.
Adamant1 (2020-06-05 05:40:31+00:00): Hi there. Just a minor thing about the scrub that you mapped in the field by the substation off of Parallel Street, for the past few years I've been using the Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta images to map everything around here. As it's the most accurate and easiest to see everything with. Especially when it comes to natural features. So, I'd appreciate it if you used that to map from. Otherwise, there will be a lot of offset issues and other problems. Looking at the images here from the Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta images and personal experience walking through there a while back, it's not really scrub.  It's more like grassland with some tree cover. Which is why I had it mapped that way in the first place. 

Also, it's usually better not to connect areas to ways (paths, roads, etc). Otherwise, it's harder on other users to move or modify the objects later. Plus, it's just completely pointless in situations like this where the area can be mapped across the path, track road, or whatever. The rare situation where I'd say that doesn't  apply is with fences. Since they act as a barrier and it's easier to only attach the area to a fence in a few places since they are normally straight. Which isn't the case for other objects mapped as lines. 

Thanks
Nakaner-repair (2020-05-08 11:10:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84889777 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 84788697. Name is the name only. The track is tagged as railway=disused to indicate that it is out of use.
Nakaner (2020-05-08 11:12:17+00:00): Hallo,

als Namen erfassen wir in OSM nur Eigennamen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Die Gleise sind schon als railway=disused erfasst, das ist ausreichend. Der Name der Bahn ändert sich nicht, wenn sie nicht mehr in Betrieb ist. Deshalb habe ich die Änderung rückgängig gemacht.

Viele Grüße

Michael
mueschel (2020-05-10 09:33:33+00:00): Hi,
regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800865336 :

We already have tags used a few times:

maxweight:hgv:trailer (25x) and many more maxspeed:hgv:trailer

There's also maxweight:semitrailer, but I don't know if this traffic sign makes a difference between trailers and semitrailers.
Jack the Ripper (2020-05-10 16:03:49+00:00): Hi mueschel,

Yes, I'm aware of those.  The problem (which this particular change isn't a good example of) is that there are different weight limits depending on axle configuration, not just "hgv:trailer".  As an example, here's a weight limit sign with 2 different restrictions for a 3-axle truck, depending on the weight distributions of the axles:  https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/sNPIyJlEMpgJ-jrmSktPeA

And I've come across quite a few more with 3 or 4 different weight limits for 5-axle trucks, all of which are large tractor-trailer setups.

In other words, the current maxweight tagging scheme is insufficient to handle the actual truck configurations that drive on the roads.  This came up in the osmus Slack channel a while back, with a long-time editor mentioning that he was going to update the wiki with a basic maxweight scheme for axles, until I showed him some of the signs that are posted.
mueschel (2020-05-10 16:19:45+00:00): I agree there are a lot of cases we can't properly handle yet. But at least for the case linked above there seems to be a solution.

For the moment, I would try to pack this in a maxweight:conditional tag, e.g.

maxweight:hgv:conditional = 12 @ (axles=2);15 @ (axles=3); 20 @ ("double hinged super semi trailer")

Having it tagged in a human readable way is better than having it not tagged at all. Routers now could alert the user that there are some restriction that need to be checked manually.

I'm not familiar with US traffic signs and symbols, but a table with all of them describing shortly what these truck categories are could help a lot.
limes11 (2020-06-16 22:19:26+00:00): Hallo roggrogg,

ich bin etwas entsetzt ob der Eintragung dieses Wegs. Zum einen ist das größtenteils ein Hang, da ist kein Weg erkennbar, da hochzugehen ist lebensgefährlich. Für solche Wege gibt es sac:scale. Der (technisch redundante) access=yes tag setzt dem ganzen die Krone auf. Das ist ein Naturschutzgebiet! Es gibt hier einen Wegeplan, ein solcher Weg darf natürlich nicht betreten werden. 

Ich habe das korrigiert.

Gruss, Limes
JodaStephen (2020-05-07 08:06:35+00:00): This is my standard tagging for areas like this, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.40128/-0.19643 for example. The key question is when does something stop being just a traffic island and start being a plaza? FWIW, I think for larger islands like this, having them rendered is useful (as opposed to an empty space) although this is not the primary motivation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84789813
JodaStephen (2020-05-07 08:09:53+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.40850/-0.21561 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.40728/-0.21938 both of which are a lot clearer for pedestrians as currently tagged.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84789813
Mike Baggaley (2020-05-07 08:18:23+00:00): This clearly is not a pedestrianised area and tagging it as such so that it displays in grey on the map is known as tagging for the renderer, which is frowned upon by the OSM community. Giving it two different highway tags is also completely confusing.
keithonearth (2021-02-21 07:33:26+00:00): This changeset creates a new relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11075507/history#map=11/49.1175/-122.6994&layers=Y), ostensibly for a bike route, but in reality containing many different routes, and uses the `name` tag "Local Surrey Bike routes". Can you provide any evidence that this is the official name, and explain why so many routes are placed in the same relation?
Krullus (2020-05-07 19:22:35+00:00): So why did you change the geomety here and the water path?  i have good local knowledge here and worked in the area. I interpret the path and waterpath from local knowledge and from the sattelite image provided in the editor!
archie (2020-05-07 20:11:51+00:00): Are you now in for a tit for tat? See even comments for cs #84772679.
Krullus (2020-05-07 20:48:28+00:00): No but it's rather frustrating that you change all geometries too your conserns. Satelite images together with local knowledge in this case is also sources.
Glassman (2020-05-07 15:11:33+00:00): Actually natural=wood is appropriate. Use landuse=forest if the area has timber harvesting.
abakus_uploader (2020-05-07 22:31:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2020-05-07 06:22:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-13 19:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104656776 where the changeset comment is: remove maps.me bookmarks not intended for osm
user_5359 (2020-05-07 02:48:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
DP24PH (2020-05-07 02:45:21+00:00): Change logs:
1. Reversion into solo carriageway for the Salawag-Paliparan segment of the Bacoor-Dasmariñas National Road/Paliparan Road from Viva Homes to Avida Residences Dasmariñas
2. Bus stop enhancements (including the associated platforms)
3. Partial addendum of missing buildings for humanitarian purposes

Note: No deleted segments
user_5359 (2020-05-07 03:15:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question to the bicycle shop: Did you see the node https://www.osm.org/node/4508853185 ? What is the right name?

Additional hint: Don't draw buildings over buildings. If there different business in one building we use nodes to plce the business information inside of the building.
Frans S (2020-06-24 10:44:38+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. None of the buildings you have mapped are fair squared.
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.
Best regards and keep mapping