piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-10-28 20:03:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GerdP (2018-10-29 08:17:17+00:00): Hi! 
Why did you change highway=road to the unusual highway=unspecified?
It looks like a highway=residential to me, as well as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92622380, which is tagged highway=unclassified (!?)
GerdP (2018-10-29 08:25:25+00:00): I also wonder why the shape of this building is so large:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638831279
All sat images show a much smaller building.
Same problem here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638831350
Maybe sat images are out-aged?
user_5173844 (2018-10-29 22:50:13+00:00): Thanks, I've fixed the highway tag. I meant to tag it as "unclassified" (I know, strange typo) like a nearby Lower Downs Slade road but I don't mind having them both changed to residential.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638831350 is visible in Esri World Imagery. Code-Point Open has a postcode at that location, indicating there should be a building there. Sizes of both buildings look correct to me. The lower one is likely not rectangular but the imagery is not very clear there.
GerdP (2018-10-30 07:00:59+00:00): Ah, OK, your cs comment said Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta, but you are right, Esri World Imagery shows the buildings with the current shapes.
Spanholz (2019-05-20 12:30:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143447973

This line is probably a former road along the railroad to Советск
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-28 21:58:42+00:00): Is this import discussed in way required by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Please, link in changeset page OSM wiki page documenting import.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-29 10:57:52+00:00): Is this edit fully reviewed by the author or is it simply an import?
-karlos- (2025-05-08 19:26:06+00:00): Lange her!
Ich mache 3D rendering und frage mich:
Warum building:part und nicht building?
Wo ist das b. wo das b:p p von ist?
Protoxenus (2025-05-09 07:24:08+00:00): Kannst du das ein bisschen eingrenzen?
-karlos- (2025-05-09 18:37:44+00:00): Oh Mist, ID vergessen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638837233
Protoxenus (2025-05-12 14:47:49+00:00): Wo ist das Problem?
https://streets.gl/#54.10845,12.10763,50.00,0.00,1056.31
-karlos- (2025-05-12 17:29:35+00:00): Das Problem ist, das so der „Part“ nur bei 3D Renderen sichtbar ist, auf allen (2D) Karten aber fehlt.
Protoxenus (2025-05-12 17:51:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Simple_3D_Buildings

Ich mache das schon seit ein paar Jahren. Du bist der Erste, der sich darüber beschwert. Ich sehe da auch keinen Gebäudeteil, der über die Grundfläche herausragt.
-karlos- (2025-05-12 18:07:28+00:00): Es fehlen Gebäude auf der Karte, richtig? Wenn sie keine sieht, fällt es nicht auf, ausser man kennt das Teil.
Da ist ja keine andrer Grundfläche, 638837233 ist einfach nur ein einzelnes Gebäude. Von was soll es ein Teil sein? Warum sollte es ein part sein?
-karlos- (2025-05-12 18:10:51+00:00): Entschuldigung, ich muß mich korrigieren. Das Gebäude IST sichtbar, so fällt also nicht auf, das es nur als part getaggt ist.
Protoxenus (2025-05-13 07:27:51+00:00): Noch mal:
- es gibt den Umriss des Gebäudes für die 2D-Darstellung: 638837230
- es gibt die Umrisse des Gebäudes für die 3D-Darstellung: 638837233 und 638837237
Damit ist alles abgedeckt. Wenn du das noch detaillierter haben möchtest, nur zu. Ich finde es aber übertrieben, alle Gebäude exakt nachzubauen, das ist ein Aufwand, der nich darstellbar ist.
-karlos- (2025-05-13 08:03:17+00:00): Oh, Entschuldigung! Ich habe (warum auch immer) nur den einen Part gesehen. Es ist so alles in Ordnung.
Am building ist keine (gesamt) Höhe. Für 2D ist das aber irrelevant
kocio (2018-11-17 02:58:07+00:00): Hi,

Why did you remove bilingual name tag for Usedom/Uznam island?
Kiekin (2018-11-17 09:30:56+00:00): Hi,
da der Name tag in jeder Sprache einzeln angegeben ist, brauch er nicht als Usedom-Uznam angegeben wer.den
freebeer (2018-11-17 10:39:39+00:00): This is bollocks.

You have deleted the generic language-agnostic default name that is used by renderers such as seen on https://www.openstreetmap.org/ that do not fallback to any particular imperialist language selection.

This is also a huge problem with maps.me rubbish edits that mangle languages and fail to provide a universal default fallback.

this change shall be reverted.

yes, i am not in a good mood.  wanna make something of it?
freebeer (2018-11-17 10:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64592834 where the changeset comment is: restore default names covering multiple languages in use locally, deleted with the grounds that each individual language is present, causing them to disappear entirely from language-agnostic renderings.
b-jazz (2018-10-28 21:28:38+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Just to let you know, there is a handy feature in iD that will "square" the buildings that you create. After you draw a circle, press 's' to make all of the corners be 90 degrees. Or you can right-click on the area and select the "Square" function that way.
Thanks again. We hope to see you continuing to add features to the map.
GerdP (2018-10-29 07:33:17+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticied this changeset because  you created new tags like highway=construction:tertiary here.
The normal way to tag this is to use two tags highway=construction + construction=tertiary.
The alternative would be to use the prefix construction: like this:
construction:highway=tertiary. 
But for highways the 1st method is better established. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Luen Warneke (2018-10-28 20:54:51+00:00): See https://wanderstories.space/hiking-at-paluma-range-national-park/
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-28 21:58:38+00:00): Is this import discussed in way required by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Please, link in changeset page OSM wiki page documenting import.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-29 10:57:49+00:00): Is this edit fully reviewed by the author or is it simply an import?
Hb- (2022-06-09 09:30:58+00:00): Ist gesichert, dass dieser Durchlaß https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638845113 existiert? Oder wurde das anhand des Luftbildes gemappt?
letihu (2022-06-09 19:59:14+00:00): Wahrscheinlich habe ich das Luftbild verwendet, um die Weg/Wasserkreuzung aufzulösen. Über den Weg fließt das Wasser sicher auch nicht.
GerdP (2018-11-01 18:30:21+00:00): Hi and welcome back to OSM!
You have added a lot of coastline ways here instead of modifying the existing ones. Now there are a huge amount of errors. I think I should revert all those changes.
GerdP (2018-11-01 20:24:52+00:00): I've reverted changesets 63960404, 63958383, and this one, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64092645 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64092735
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-28 21:58:26+00:00): Is this import discussed in way required by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Please, link in changeset page OSM wiki page documeting import.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-29 10:57:38+00:00): Is this edit fully reviewed by the author or is it a blind import?
maraf24 (2018-10-28 21:17:57+00:00): Te budynki nie mają kątów prostych tam, gdzie powinny mieć, czyli po prostu są krzywe.
W edytorze wystarczy nacisnać "S", by wyprostować kąty.
Matthew Darwin (2018-10-29 15:00:35+00:00): Hi, you have "Ottawa Torah Institute High School (for boys)" listed on Chapel St, but near Coldrey Ave.  Could you check?  Probably the address is wrong?
zzptichka (2018-10-29 15:17:52+00:00): Yeah it moved. Fixed
maraf24 (2019-02-18 10:00:15+00:00): Wandalizm.
Steenbuck (2018-11-24 14:31:31+00:00): Do you really mean a voltage of 7.2 kV?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2018-11-24 16:05:45+00:00): fixed
Essin (2019-04-07 11:26:49+00:00): Eniros kartor, åtminstone i Sverige, är upphovsrättsskyddade och får inte användas som underlag för OSM. (Det gäller alla kartor om de inte är tillräckligt gamla eller det finns uttryckligt tillstånd, men på Eniro står det dessutom "© Lantmäteriet/OptiWay AB" i nedre högra hörnet, vilket undanröjer alla tvivel.) Ändringarna som baserats på Eniro-underlag måste tyvärr återställas. Mer info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
InsertUser (2018-10-29 20:00:36+00:00): What is the utility of this edit?

It appears this only creates the opportunity to introduce erroneous deviation to lines that are straight by definition and contradicts: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_straight_ways_straight
b-jazz (2018-10-29 20:21:53+00:00): IMHO, that makes complete sense for straight, smaller ways. But for massive ways it becomes a problem when the nodes that define the way are far outside of the bbox that you are querying for. You aren't aware that a way is traversing your work and that might cause an issue. It's one of the reasons OSM Inspector calls it out as a problem.
InsertUser (2018-10-29 22:06:45+00:00): That may be somewhat true for a road, but what valid interaction local detail could have with the Bermuda Triangle is beyond me (save at the end points).

I think the utility of this view on OSM Inspector is that many long ways are caused by things like a node being drastically misplaced accidentally (e.g. moved to 0,0) and are not realistic. 

In other cases the way needs further legitimate refinement from imagery or survey (as you have done in some of your other recent edits). Artificial division of those ways masks a problem that still exists from people who may be able to resolve it. If no more detailed information is available, then I think the sparse data we have should remain as is rather than being further ingrained by interpolation.

In some cases though these long segments are real  and I think should remain as is. In this particular case I think there is far greater danger from the way getting falsely entangled with objects in the Atlantic than there is from accidental duplication etc.
b-jazz (2018-10-29 22:55:51+00:00): Another reason for breaking these up is that any accidental moves of a way (to 0,0 for instance) would be masked by all of the other long segments that exist. If we segment the long ways, any mistakes that are made will be more likely to stick out rather than be obscured by many other valid long ways. So my argument is that you need to "clean" them all up in order for mistakes to stand out.

Also, thanks very much for the discussion. I appreciate the feedback.
b-jazz (2018-10-29 23:38:30+00:00): From the OSM Inspector wiki page: "So while it might not be a "proper" solution its certainly pragmatic to make the segments shorter. Another problem is due to the current implementation of the OSM API: When requesting all objects inside a bounding box only nodes in this bounding box and ways having a node in this bounding box will be returned. (This is done because it is more efficient.) So the longer the segments are and the smaller the bounding box the bigger the chances that some object will not be returned from the API call and might not appear on the map."
b-jazz (2018-10-30 00:31:31+00:00): Some more discussion on the topic is taking place on the US Slack instance: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C029HV951/p1540853913092600
Nakaner (2018-11-01 13:18:05+00:00): Hi,

I am one of the developers of OSMI.

Not everything which is shown by OSMI is an error. Some things are correct but difficult or impossible to distinguish from real errors.

You should not insert nodes into long segments to make something disappear from OSMI or any other quality assurance tool. That would be mapping for the QA tool and is not better than tagging for a specific renderer/map style.

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2018-11-01 13:19:11+00:00): Note: I don't use Slack because I don't agree their terms of use and avoid proprietary software in my spare time.
b-jazz (2018-11-01 19:10:30+00:00): @Nakaner, maybe you can add a feature to only show actual errors (self intersecting ways, duplicate nodes, etc). Also, it would be helpful if OSMI could put some language in the pop-up for long segments saying that people shouldn't fix them.
As for the Bermuda Triangle, I reverted my change a day or two ago as the consensus seems to be to not fix this class of (non-)problem.
EdLoach (2018-10-29 09:30:02+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM. I can't find any mention of a Brook Spring near Lawford anywhere online and wondered how you know about it/where I can find more information? Best wishes. Ed
peaceloveunity (2018-10-29 10:26:24+00:00): Hi ed. yes sadly springs in this area are not well documented, and have virtually no online presence, but still thrive in local knowledge. A very nice spring next to the brook, hence the name, with steps leading down. Lovely water.
EdLoach (2018-10-29 15:01:04+00:00): Thanks. Is it accessible to everyone, as it looks a bit like it is in the garden of The Glade. I'd be interested in going to see it if I can.
peaceloveunity (2018-10-29 17:42:20+00:00): Yep its accessible. Just off the road. A layby space for a car to pull over next to it aswell. Yeah do!
mueschel (2018-11-08 18:46:15+00:00): Hi,
you used the key "railway:railway_crossing:movable" here. Did you mean "railway:railway_crossing:movable_frog"?
JJJWegdam (2018-11-08 19:54:54+00:00): Hi,
The tagging is correct.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging
mueschel (2018-11-09 17:43:42+00:00): That's interesting.  You're the first one to use this tag. 
There are already 83 occurences of "railway:railway_crossing:movable_frog" which (I think) refer to the same thing but this key is not documented.
JJJWegdam (2018-11-10 09:04:37+00:00): They refer to the same thing. Either the wiki is wrong or the 83 tags are wrong. I’ll ask the OpenRailwayMap community
Almtesh (2018-11-07 10:16:53+00:00): Les « points », on appelle ça des nœuds.
Colin Smale (2018-10-28 23:55:54+00:00): Hi,
I assume you didn't mean to delete the Church Stretton / Wistanstow CP boundary?
SomeoneElse (2018-10-29 14:37:09+00:00): Indeed not - what I'd imagine I intended to delete was a bit of old waterway around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4585271296#map=19/52.50360/-2.82305 .  I see that it's back now though https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479800737/history .
jgon6 (2018-10-29 00:49:46+00:00): Thanks for doing this it looks good. If you want to do more for this project I'll tell you that the Mapbox imagery is newer and higher res, so it'll work better for you around here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63962025
Ale_Zena_IT (2018-10-29 09:00:35+00:00): Ciao, ho inserito il tag building=roof perchè la geometria disegnata non ne aveva.
Se sei della zona riusciresti mica a sistemare correttamente i due gruppi di numeri civici rossi che sono sul Palazzo ONPI e più su dal civico 8A? Grazie.
Alessandro
Redeer (2019-05-19 10:50:58+00:00): TCHE TCHE CAFE& RESTAURANT DUHOK
Almtesh (2018-11-07 10:22:06+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM,
Je vois que tu as ajouté des attributs operator_1. Cet attribut n'existe pas.
En plus, l'attribut operator ne se met pas sur les arrêts de bus.
eggie (2019-01-12 10:18:22+00:00): Hoi.. Die fietsoversteek bij de Koekoekstraat heb ik weggehaald. Die is er niet (meer) Iets ten westen ervan heb ik de path omgezet naar cycleway. Daar is de oversteek.
HG,
Eggie
JJIglesias (2018-10-30 06:29:54+00:00): El Campo Comments es para que expliques cual fue la naturaleza del cambio que hiciste y el Por que lo hiciste. No para que coloques tu nombre. Ya Sabemos quien hizo el cambio. Lo que queremos saber es el por que lo hiciste.
Slds
JJ
Chetan_Gowda (2018-10-29 03:45:11+00:00): Hi nilavarsha, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I appreciate your localisation work. Do not replace default English names of the city or neighborhoods. This will lead places unreachable. You can follow name:hi=* to add Hindi names.  

Thanks!
keithonearth (2019-06-27 00:19:51+00:00): Unfortunately you have failed to follow these instructions, and while some edits have just added Hindi in the default `name` tag, others have replaced existing name tags with Hindi ones.
viloan (2018-10-29 00:29:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Glassman (2018-10-29 05:33:09+00:00): A trail should be a way tagged as highway=path + name=Craft Island Trail. As a stand alone node with just a name it won't be very helpful. Can you add the trail in? If you need help, just ask. I'll send you a message with more info.
quark21 (2019-05-07 19:00:39+00:00): Hier  in der Gegend wird vom "Kloster Glattburg" gesprochen. Auf den Wegweisern an der Strasse steht auch "Kloster St. Gallenberg".
Ich würde vorschlagen, dass wir das Kloster wie in Aenderungssatz #3 zusätzlich wieder eintragen. Die Einträge zum Schloss überschneiden sich ja nicht und man könnte sie so lassen. Nur den Namen würde ich auf "Koster St. Gallenberg" ändern (wie der Wegweiser) und "Schloss Schenken-Glattburg" als old_name oder alt_name eintragen.
Soweit einverstanden?
Geonick (2019-05-07 19:58:59+00:00): Klar, einverstanden.
Geonick (2019-05-07 20:09:25+00:00): Hab's so angepasst und WP/WD ergänzt.
quark21 (2019-05-09 11:28:14+00:00): Danke!
viloan (2018-10-29 00:54:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:36:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:41:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:38:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:39:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:40:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:24:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
contrapunctus (2018-11-15 19:07:25+00:00): Hey, lmum, thanks for your work here 🙂

I'm curious as to what your source is for the name "Panchsheel Forest". I got "DDA Park, Panchsheel" from a stone sign near the southernmost gate.
lmum (2018-11-20 12:17:32+00:00): Hi contrapuntus, 

As a remote mapper, I'm glad to defer to local information. I pulled this and a few other forest outlines from this DUAC report on urban greenways.
  
http://e.duac.org/images/pdf/4%20Delhi%20Greenways.pdf
contrapunctus (2019-04-03 04:35:35+00:00): Ah, cool 🙂 I've now seen another sign near the Siri Fort-GK intersection (north-east of this park) which too says "DDA Park, Panchsheel". Perhaps we can use that as the name, and "Panchsheel Forest" as the alt_name?
lmum (2019-04-03 17:54:46+00:00): Works for me! Editing from Detroit, so I trust your insight on this.
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:38:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:28:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
bhousel (2018-10-29 02:22:53+00:00): Hey 420blazer, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your edits. Is there really a bar here called "Roofie House"?  Bing streetview imagery doesn't show anything that looks like a bar.  If it's not really a bar please remove it, thanks!