piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freebeer (2018-01-31 05:33:34+00:00): Hi Scoop,
The changeset description you gave here had me worried, and looking at your work, which must have taken some time, the worst I feared was true.
You are working in an area which is not well served by detailed aerial imagery, and by default you have used Bing, which is a satellite imagery provided by DigitalGlobe and known to have a signifigant offset in many areas.
I measured that the one building you shifted which I tested now has an offset of four metres from the position the old aerial imagery offered, which in this case is much closer to reality.
The older imagery, which includes some buildings you deleted, is available either as Mapbox, or now officially as ESRI (Clarity) Beta.
The third source is the USGS Large Scale imagery, which is poor in detail but well-aligned everwhere I have tested so that it is a reasonable reference.
Do you know about these alternate imagery layers, available to you with the kezboard command `b' ?
.
I have made comments to other changesets about this, but I have not yet made a template, nor noted the URLs to allow you to read what I wrote there.
If you want to work with Bing as the newest, you are also able to shift that to match the positioning of the other images.
I don't know if you want your work to be undone, but it is possible, if you agree things are now misplaced, and don't want to move things again.  You would lose, as far as I see, only a few deleted buildings.
I hope this makes sense....
Thanks!
Scoop268 (2018-01-31 06:08:44+00:00): I see exactly what you mean...  I had no idea that you could adjust the background map to align it to the overlay...  I used your background imagery and see what you mean....  I would say that if you could just undo the work that I have done that would be the best.

Now that I know about the imagery alignment issue, I would rather just start over....
Scoop268 (2018-01-31 06:09:24+00:00): If you can delete the change sets that I have done today that would be fine.
freebeer (2018-01-31 12:17:10+00:00): Hi again...
Sorry, I sent off that comment shortly before falling asleep, and before I saw you had done several more, more complex changesets, earlier that day.
I'm writing this shortly after awakening, and once in a Blue Moon I like to go outside, so if it's okay, I'll return to this after I dust the cobwebs into the corners of me brane, in a few hours.
If someone else wants to join in and do this, feel welcome.  There look to be from the changeset descriptions up to ten that may be candidates (I only ran the newest three or four through achavi for a diff overview:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=609462#11/47.3914/-97.0529
)
Also, it may be possible to recover any additions you have drawn from scratch - but in the ``wrong'' places; I will look into this when I sprawl out on the floor later.
Scoop268 (2018-01-31 16:13:17+00:00): So I just took a quick peak at the map edits that I had done yesterday, with changing the background imagery...  Now that I am awake again, I took a closer look.

(Hopefully you had a good view of the blue blood moon where you were)

Bing, DigiGlobe, ESRI all had the same issue...  they were all about 4 meters to the west before you adjust the background map...  appearing to be very close to the same issues that I thought I was adjusting last night with the bing imagery.  When I pull up USGS the background imagery is maybe 2 meters to the west, but also about 1 meter to the south... (These three appeared to be about the same)

The only map that was spot on was the Mapbox map...  and since this is the only Map that appears to be "accurate" to the background imagery, I feel confident in saying that whoever did these edits was using that imagery.  

So the big question is...  which background map is actually an accurate depiction of what I need to work on?  Or are they all just a little off?  I now see why the background imagery can be adjusted!  It had been several years since I had worked with open street and I took the tutorial again just to brush up, and I wish it would have covered this important issue.

So moving forward...  What imagery is really accurate?  I will then use that to begin work and once I have a point of reference, I should be able to work with bing after the adjustment is made to correct any error.  I just need to know if the Mapbox was accurate when it was first completed...
freebeer (2018-02-04 20:47:59+00:00): This one ... is .... well, eyeballing it, some six or so small buildings/sheds will be re-animated.  Not too bad.
Nodes: 110 2810 76 Ways: 20 5 16 Relations: 000
The exact details on what 16 ways you deleted are listed directly below on this page, along with whatever random nodes will come back to life.
This works near the government buildings you moved, but does not touch them.
Will as usual start a dry-run first.
freebeer (2018-02-04 21:18:00+00:00): Details of the 20 new ways that you added, including three car parks, are listed on page 2 below of Ways with one straggler on page three.
I can make out some of them in the achavi URL, including a rounded tank-or-something near one you shifted.  (The washed-out-yellow is too close to the washed-out-green here with two of my on-screen clocks in those rich colours somewhat better.)
.
These deleted objects can in theory be restored to life with some Flash editor magic, if things are not too messy and if you think it is worth the bother.
.
I am not sure if I have the patience for this whole dry-run, so here we go
freebeer (2018-02-04 22:20:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56067398 where the changeset comment is: Undo misguided alignment to newer satellite rather than aerials
user_5359 (2018-01-31 05:52:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between waterway and natural=water, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterways and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Anatural%3Dwater.
Please change to natural=water, watre=pond. If you need help: You are welcome.
tonyf1 (2018-01-31 05:51:54+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your map contributions. This post office appears to be a duplicate of Node: 1085489535 which is 30 metres east?
jakecopp (2018-02-01 03:37:24+00:00): Hi, thanks for letting me know, you're absolutely right. I'll remove it now.
freebeer (2018-02-04 20:38:52+00:00): This is entirely to the west of Hillsboro.  You seem to have done an almost equal amount of fixup to new imagery, and relatively few simple shifts of significance.
Nodes: 112 184 26 Ways: 17 27 2 Relations: 000
I am going to leave this one alone too, you can see what areas you might revisit (or just not bother) in
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55919084
or just review everything later with a bit more experience under the belt.
.
The next one is gonna be a biggie :-)
Refl_ex (2019-06-13 13:26:56+00:00): Зелёная зона действительно имеет название "Сокол"?
farmal (2019-07-23 04:10:07+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 557212832 classified as 'service driveway'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' .

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-30 10:41:07+00:00): Way 557212832 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557212832) could be an alley (service=alley) instead.

It's a quite narrow highway passing through some houses which do not belong in a planned housing estate e.g. the one just laying south of these houses.

http://osmz.ru/imagery/#19/6.17116/100.36885/mp
Garppa (2018-01-31 06:11:55+00:00): Siis Laulaistentietä Salimäentiellepäin.
Gppes (2018-03-10 14:38:54+00:00): Hi, you set an "access=no" tag to a main road! "access=no" means, that absolutely no one is allowed to use  that road. Please be careful!
rio1403 (2018-03-12 05:04:45+00:00): It means: "No Trucks more than 7500 kg is allowed to used the road FOHNSDORFERSTRASSE".
Gppes (2018-03-12 06:27:50+00:00): Thanks for your reply, that's a valued information!

I will try to implement that today in the evening and show you the results afterwards!
Gppes (2018-03-12 18:24:53+00:00): Hi,  noch mal, weisst Du genau wo das Verbot aufhoert und anfaengt? Geht das wirklich ueber die ganze Fohnsdorferstrasse oder ist das  nur im Ortsgebiet von Poels?

Lg, Gppes
rio1403 (2018-03-13 05:23:38+00:00): Das Fahrverbot geht von der Kreuzung L503/L533 bis zur Kreuzung Zellstoff Pöls  Tauernstraße 17.

(Grund ist der Schwerverkehr durch das Ortsgebiet von Pöls zur Zellstofffabrik. Umleitung über  L533 in Richtung NW bis zur Kreuzung B114, danach retour nach Pöls über B114.)
Gppes (2018-03-13 20:40:43+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank, ich habe das jetzt eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57157493

Lg, Gppes
stephankn (2020-11-11 18:40:58+00:00): what did you want to add? Is this a restaurant? Or a shop?
viloan (2018-01-31 06:35:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Nakaner-repair (2018-02-11 23:56:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 56277501, 56277015, 56277682, 56275296 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and undiscussed address import/mass modification by user geocodec. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2018-February/009114.html. This also reverts some other bad edits which rely on versions uploaded by this import.
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:37:58+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
Supaplex (2019-02-08 17:02:02+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
andygol (2018-02-04 19:22:15+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55920907
DaxServer (2018-01-31 17:07:45+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55920987
andygol (2018-02-04 19:22:00+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55921175
andygol (2018-02-04 19:21:34+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55921233
eggie (2018-01-31 08:54:45+00:00): No information and trafel_agency present here. I will delete your contribution.
eggie (2018-01-31 08:59:05+00:00): deleted nodes from the middle of the airfield.
user_5359 (2018-01-31 17:08:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
LivInTheLookingGlass (2018-02-19 06:20:19+00:00): Hi. Please add more details than an address next time. I'll fix it up for you, but for the future, please note that more detail is appreciated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55922495
Constable (2018-01-31 08:44:14+00:00): ciao, grazie per l'aggiunta.
Credo che l'etichetta più corretta per questo albero sarebbe denotation=natural_monument https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denotation?uselang=it
Constable (2018-02-18 20:22:28+00:00): ciao, la mia osservazione è ancora valida
MichthePuk (2018-02-19 08:19:16+00:00): scusami, non mi aveva preso la modifica! Corretto secondo tua indicazione!
Constable (2018-02-19 08:22:11+00:00): ottimo, grazie!
abakus_uploader (2018-01-31 23:31:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Cascafico (2018-01-31 08:50:00+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto in OSM! 

puoi indicare le fonti del changeset?
TOPPAOLO (2018-02-02 14:41:26+00:00): Ciao, 
ho usato la foto satellitare per aggiornare le posizioni, poi le modifiche agli edifici sono fatte perchè le vedo goni giorno. ;)
abakus_uploader (2018-01-31 23:31:16+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
johsin18 (2018-01-31 08:16:11+00:00): Why have you removed helpful information, including the name?  Were they wrong?  Or has that club closed?
el-sia (2018-02-01 14:00:58+00:00): -  
Hi johsin18, thanks for your attention and your interest of my modification.  
-  
[...]Why have you removed helpful information, including the name?[...]  
Could you please tell me first which information I did remove?  
-  
[...]Were they wrong?[...]  
Then maybe I could answer this question.  
-  
[...]Or has that club closed?[...]  
No, I don’t think so, please check website. Why you ask that, I changed position to other lon/lat position. Please see for further details and maybe better graphical illustration this link:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55922755
johsin18 (2018-02-02 06:12:44+00:00): Hi el-sia,
sorry, I overlooked that you added a new node, just saw the the removed tags on the building.  This is not very obvious on Achavi sometimes. So everything is alright.
Happy mapping!
el-sia (2018-02-02 17:38:42+00:00): OK thanks for response and clarification.  
-  
[...] So everything is alright. [...]  
Not really 100% ;-), this account has a displayed red line for changesets comments at Pascal's stat-tool, see:  
http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?el-sia
user_6110846 (2018-01-31 08:18:26+00:00): Доброго дня Прохання пишіть чіткіші коментарі  з поваги до іншиї маперів
user_6110846 (2018-01-31 08:23:33+00:00): Село Мирлоги це суцільне порушення стандарту укр спільноти це перше візьміть за приклад https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7525836

Друге   усі правки з полігонами треба робити в програмі Josm    В айді нема інструментів перевірки цілісності зв*язку та глюків .
abakus_uploader (2018-01-31 23:31:15+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
literan (2018-01-31 10:44:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Адреса на POI не нужны, они по правилам нужны на зданиях. К тому же вы неправильно написали адрес (как правильно - см. здесь https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr ). Я исправил.
Stereo (2018-07-26 15:21:25+00:00): Hello! I'm just wondering if this no_u_turn relation is correct: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7953754
Constable (2018-01-31 10:17:54+00:00): Hi there, why did you delete this hut? on the NZ LINZ topo map it's marked as historic, was it semi-demolished?
thanks
realthargor (2018-02-27 23:39:20+00:00): There was no pathway or bridge at this point and I couldn't see a structure or anything else on the other side of the river. At least the POI had to be deleted, because it shows up as accommendation which is it clearly not.
Glassman (2019-08-28 16:47:24+00:00): A year ago you changed this street from 147th to Cottonwood from TIGER data. There is a WSDOT Washington Roads overlay available in JOSM with data the state collects from the counties. I would encourage you to use it instead of TIGER.
Pavel47 (2018-05-10 10:52:40+00:00): Доброго времени суток! Расскажите, пожалуйста, с какой целью Вы меняете статус стихийно проложенных проездов, где отсутствует возможность транзитного проезда, на highway=residential? Вы как-то индивидуально рассматриваете объекты перед внесением изменений?
Supaplex (2019-02-08 17:01:42+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:37:25+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
Владимир К (2018-02-01 07:45:25+00:00): вы неправильно указываете адрес. перестаньте так делать. за вами всё нужно переделывать.
yaugenka (2018-03-29 20:38:01+00:00): привет! было бы неплохо при переводе нп в урочище оставлять прошлое значение place в abandoned:place, чтобы была возможность отличить его от других видов урочищ.
http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=7522140
Prusaker (2018-03-30 19:52:32+00:00): Спасибо за замечание, на будущее учту этот момент.
Gumeg (2018-01-31 11:07:01+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the edit!
Which validator or service you use to find such mistakes in boundaries?
Helmchen42 (2018-01-31 19:00:10+00:00): I am looking at the relations listed in wambachers missing boundaries analysis: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1119-countries-compare-2018-01-31

Current thread (german): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207
GinaroZ (2018-01-31 13:23:43+00:00): Can't work out what you changed here?
Mike Baggaley (2018-01-31 13:39:54+00:00): I split closed way 123192913 in two to clarify it is not an area. Must have missed the comment.
DD1GJ (2018-01-31 10:01:17+00:00): Hallo thomas_cgn, es ist nicht gerade die feine Art, mit immer dem gleichen Kommentar systematisch aus bestehenden Flächen einen Park zu machen. Hier hat Du z.B. einen Spielplatz zerstört, der nun unauffindbar ist.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Wenn Du so weitermachst, werden alle Deine Änderungen nach einer Stichprobenkontrolle pauschal zurückgesetzt.
DD1GJ (2018-02-01 07:46:24+00:00): Diese Änderung wurde zurückgesezt, ebenso doppelte Spielplätze und eine fiktive Fußgängerzone.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
user_5359 (2018-01-31 16:46:04+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ein Kennzeichnung mit area=yes ohne jede weiteren Angaben ist sinnlos. Bitte lies Dir aus dem Wiki mal folgende Seit durch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:sport%3Dshooting
eggie (2018-01-31 10:34:02+00:00): Hoi... Hier kun je zien waar Het Schapenmeer nog vastzit aan dat bos. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55925459

Selecteer de node en druk op G-toets. Dan zit het los.
eggie (2018-01-31 10:37:50+00:00): ... en bij nr 11 ligt nog een los stukje Het Schapendrift. Wel beter zo!
xp_ (2018-08-09 13:10:56+00:00): 粗鄙字眼實在礙眼
萼溫不是溫萼
GerdP (2018-10-30 19:27:16+00:00): Hi!
Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548629361
You added highway=traffic_signals to a building, as well as a name. Was any of this intended?
pschonmann (2018-11-08 17:56:24+00:00): Ahoj. Datumy prosím zadávej jako YYYY-MM-DD
Petr Slavíček (2018-11-09 05:10:03+00:00): Ok
TuanIfan (2018-10-24 06:31:33+00:00): Khu trồng cây xanh đẹp đó, nhưng có bao gồm luôn 'Cửa hàng gạo..' không bạn?
mavl (2018-01-31 16:51:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо. Просто напомню, что есть соглашение о названиях улиц. [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3]  
Если кратко, то "улица Пушкина", но "Пушкинская улица".  
  
В названии "Сосновая  улица" два пробела подряд.
wf72 (2018-01-31 17:38:30+00:00): Спасибо, в следующий раз буду знать.
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-02 06:43:26+00:00): Ciao e beenvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Il wiki è questo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:sport=climbing?uselang=it
Io cancellerei sport_1 e nel name inserirei solo il nome "vero" del luogo. Molte falesie hanno un nome, se non cel'ha non inserire nulla.