piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2021-07-15 23:14:21+00:00): buenas tardes y gracias por contestar!

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=104979184

lo a que me refiero es el corredor estaba como highway=secondary y el carril en construcción como construction=secondary, y los pusiste en highway=primary, que no pega con el resto del área, ni con el puente sobre el río Juan Díaz.
woodpeck (2021-05-19 19:39:20+00:00): Dear alkushi, pleasy try to add proper changeset comments to your edits, instead of just one-letter comments. These are not useful for anyone :(
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-05-19 18:40:14+00:00): Korrektur: Bispingen (nicht Schneverdingen)
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-05-19 18:40:07+00:00): Korrektur: Bispingen (nicht Schneverdingen)
AndrewSnow (2021-08-20 05:28:44+00:00): I have moved the text of your edit to a note tag on the building.  As others have pointed out, your text misuses the purpose of the building name field.  Pls see our basic best practices guidance at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
birdlawyer (2021-05-19 19:16:19+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapillary
TobyL86 (2021-05-19 19:05:03+00:00): Vielen Dank, tut mir leid, dass die Ref.-Nummer des zweiten Briefkastens nicht sichtbar war, schlechtes Bild. Kannst du sie vielleicht ganz rausnehmen? Dann wird sie der nächsten Person mit StreetComplete nochmal angezeigt
Piagno (2021-05-19 19:07:38+00:00): Das ist doch nicht schlimm.
Danke für den Hinweis mit der Ref-Nummer. Wusste nicht dass es dafür einen Streetcomplete "Auftrag" gibt. Habe sie entsprechend entfernt
fabiotofy (2021-05-20 08:03:14+00:00): è un vero peccato perdere nel tage "name" il nome con cui tutti chiamano la Napoleonica. Inoltre nella Via / Ulica Robert Baden-Powell la tabella marmorea affissa all'inizio riporta proprio questa indicazione. Perché perderne parte del toponimo ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104980548
skquinn (2021-06-18 17:31:25+00:00): We have had several dubious edits of the Sugar Land border in the past few months. What is your data source for this?
Jakka (2021-05-22 15:47:11+00:00): Je ne trouve pas un point de départ route foot ou bicycle ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8747012149#map=19/50.35828/4.27747&layers=N
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrailhead
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104980609
user_5359 (2021-05-21 06:00:51+00:00): Hello! Please use landcover instead of landvover. I have already corrected the error.

But please have a look on your edits. You have over lapping land uses (for example: https://www.osm.org/way/944767629, https://www.osm.org/way/944819860)
user345 (2021-05-20 14:12:41+00:00): Mag ja so sein. Allerdings hast du mit deiner Bearbeitung etliche andere Bestandsflächen (Wasserrückhaltebecken, Gebüsch, Wiesen, Weiden etc.) restlos gelöscht. Fügst du diese wieder hinzu oder was passiert mit ihnen? Beispielsweise befindet sich oberhalb "Am Feldtor" jetzt einfach ein Loch in der Entwässerungsanlage, da das vorher eingezeichnete Rückhaltebecken durch deine Bearbeitung gelöscht wurde.
hmkaiser (2021-05-21 15:56:02+00:00): Gut Ding will Weile haben: Diese Totschlag-Multipolygene zu ersetzen bedeutet schon einen ordentlichen, mehrtägigen Arbeitsaufwand. Mittlerweile sollte fast alles wieder da sein.
mueschel (2021-05-22 12:50:34+00:00): Hi,
please check the tagging of this node, it got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8747175388
adrianojbr (2021-05-23 15:07:32+00:00): Hi.

Fixed name. Thank's.
b-unicycling (2022-08-25 20:20:48+00:00): could you specify what stile=dy means and possibly correct the tag, pls?
dudone (2022-08-25 20:39:32+00:00): Fixed
woodpeck (2021-05-20 07:55:34+00:00): I am not sure if it is a good idea to model legal constructs (i.e. treaties) in OSM. NATO is one of the biggies but where do you draw the line, there a thousands of multilateral treaties. Is something like that (= non-geographic facts about the world) not better left to Wikidata?
JeroenvanderGun (2021-05-20 10:21:56+00:00): Several type=treaty relations were already created by others, most notably the European Union. I figured more type=treaty relations would be needed before any sort of inclusion in the OSM interface is relevant. I'd only include treaties that establish a (significant) international organisation (and use the name of that organisation, not the name of the treaty).
Keima (2021-05-19 20:28:46+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Je vois que vous contribuez dans le cadre d'un cours de SNT, et il semble y avoir d'autres comptes de la même classe. Est-ce que tous les comptes sont ceux d'élèves?
Il y a t'il un compte de l'enseignant?

Bonne continuation,
Andrea Musuruane (2021-05-20 07:00:54+00:00): Ciao. Hai inserito i dati di un POI di Milano a Vercelli. Provvedo a rimuovere. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104982172
Valerio_Bozzolan (2021-05-20 09:02:02+00:00): @Andrea Musuruane
Ops grazie!
zyphlar (2021-05-20 18:29:52+00:00): Hey FYI when you're conflating, pay special care not to delete good info. This node for 1532 Brookside Drive #A for example seems to refer to a "granny unit" and was placed over a separate building from 1532 Brookside Drive proper, and yet was deleted. A similar thing happened with 631 Codding Drive as well. Check out tools like OSMCha.org for better ways of visualizing changesets if that helps. Thanks for all your hard work locally!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8413909445
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104982555
jrpear (2021-05-20 21:24:36+00:00): Thanks for reviewing this! I looked at these in person and didn't see any markings for "XXX #A" addresses on the houses, though they do appear to be granny units. The #A just seems to be the way that the SR city surveyor marked these things. I don't know the OSM way of marking them so I removed the addresses. If you know how they're supposed to be mapped I'm happy to do so.

I should have published these changes in a separate changeset with explanation but I was lazy.
zyphlar (2021-05-20 22:55:55+00:00): Ah gotcha no biggie, obviously if you surveyed in person that is the most authoritative. (I'm also a big fan of looking at mailboxes!)
Felipe Alves (2021-05-20 14:09:30+00:00): Oi, Fernando. Tudo bem?
Entendi que quis inserir a gráfica, mas não especificou nada no ponto. A forma correta é inserir o ponto em cima do estabelecimento (não conectado a rua), e inserir os dados nos campos designados.
Qualquer dúvida, avisa.
Abs
Keima (2021-05-19 20:33:18+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez demandé une relecture de vos modifications. D'après l'attribut "name" vous avez ajouté un radiologue. Les premiers tags que vous avez ajoutés sont correct pour signifier qu'il y a un médecin ici. Néanmoins "healthcare:speciality=radiology" peut être rajouté pour indiquer que c'est un radiologue.

Cordialement,
zorglubu (2021-05-21 14:26:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Bienvenue sur OSM et merci d'avoir ajouter des arbres.
Veuillez noter qu'un arbre doit être étiqueté natural=tree (cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:natural%3Dtree#Comment_cartographier) et qu'il n'a pas à porter de nom "sapin" ou "cerisier" sauf si, exceptionnellement, il a un vrai nom comme "Arbre de la Liberté". Par contre on peut préciser son genre ou son espèce avec genus ou species.
Je n'ai rien touché : je vous laisse corriger. Mais n'hésitez pas à poser des questions au besoin.
Merci encore pour vos contributions, et bonne cartographie ! :-)
Keima (2021-05-19 20:40:31+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

J'ai relu vos modifications. Ce morceau de route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159976482 semble avoir été modifié dans une géométrie étrange. Est-ce normal?

Bonne continuation,
Keima (2021-05-22 12:59:17+00:00): C'est corrigé par https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105131998
user_5359 (2021-05-20 06:47:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question, what is the meaning of the key CP_Trail_ID?
GWFabian (2021-05-20 13:28:42+00:00): This trail passes through a community, Crosspointe, that maintains it. CP_Trail_ID is the identifier for this trail segment. I haven't assigned any other segment IDs because I wanted to see if this would work.
user_5359 (2021-05-20 15:10:29+00:00): In this case the key ref:US:cp_trail ist the better choice (lowercase only uppercase for the country notation).
GWFabian (2021-05-20 17:46:47+00:00): Very good, confirming that I will use ref:US:cp_trail. Thanks.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-05-20 10:16:02+00:00): شكرا لك
Max-Kritic (2021-05-28 11:41:20+00:00): http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#username=Robin%20Pilot&zoom=18&lat=50.637591&lon=2.391575&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3
Max-Kritic (2021-06-28 12:37:47+00:00): Cela n'est pas fonctionnelle ce parking. Aucune voiture ne sait y parvenir faute de route. C'est un parking public ou privé ? Combien de places en tout ? Je vais corriger.
eggie (2021-05-19 20:38:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Meestal zijn tweewielers uitegezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer.
Is dat hier het geval?
Dan bijtaggen
oneway:bicycle=no

en evt
oneway:moped=no
oneway:mofa=no

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-20 10:51:25+00:00): Aangepast zodat het weer voor (brom)fietsers routeert.
mvg
eggie
Keima (2021-05-19 20:37:44+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Bonne continuation,
Diorex (2021-05-19 21:10:43+00:00): https://clearinghouse.isgs.illinois.edu/data/reference/illinois-county-boundaries-polygons-and-lines

3100 East south to East 6th road is the county line, The city of Wenona is almost entirely in Marshall County.
user_5359 (2021-05-21 05:53:14+00:00): Hello! What I the meaning of the keys 
KİLO İLE PARÇA KUMAŞ=SÖKE - EGE KUMAŞ PAZARI VE TEKSTİL ÜRÜNLERİ
TEKSTİL ÜRÜNLERİ=SÖKE - EGE KUMAŞ PAZARI VE TEKSTİL ÜRÜNLERİ ?
Geogast (2022-12-03 15:19:54+00:00): In this changeset, you invented a footway bridge (944853358) that is still in construction; far from being in use. Did you really go there and have a look?! (I mean, it says source=ground survey…)
please correct that
(Inactive) Buddy-the-Elf (2022-12-05 20:48:40+00:00): The bridge has been removed so that it can be accurately mapped at the completion of the construction of the monorail. Thank you for keeping these features up to date!
Dimitar155 (2021-05-23 07:33:56+00:00): Hello Lamia Petrica and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for mapping these buildings, but please make sure that you square their corners. You can do it by selecting the building and pressing Q on your keyboard. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

Happy mapping,
Dimitar155
Geogast (2022-12-03 15:17:59+00:00): In this changeset you changed a railway construction node (#3972195882) to railway=crossing. Have you ever seen a crossing on a monorail?! It was easy to see that this monorail station is still in construction. Not a very good edit for a paid mapper.
Geogast (2022-12-03 15:20:07+00:00): please, correct that
(Inactive) Buddy-the-Elf (2022-12-05 20:42:46+00:00): Thank you for keeping the railway features up to date! The crossing node has been updated to a railway construction node.
mariotomo (2021-05-19 21:22:32+00:00): Hola Carlos Eduardo, me alegro que sigas mapeando.  puedo sugerirte de mejorar tu estilo de comentario a los conjuntos de cambios? "La Colorada, Santiago Veraguas", lo veo de la extensión, no añade ninguna información. "añadí unos edificios" es más breve y de mayor ayuda a quien revise lo que pasa en el área. gracias. (no es mi invención: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)
Violaine_Do (2021-05-20 19:46:15+00:00): Hi Mueschel, please document the use of tagging traffic_sign=Diasbled_Parking in case you still want to use it, as there is only 3 use cases in OSM: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=traffic_sign%3DDisabled_Parking
I didn't find any wiki reference for using it. 
Btw, you never answered my comment on this changeset : 103712674 so i corrected it today.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104985690
mueschel (2021-05-20 20:31:42+00:00): You added the tag 'sign:disabled' here - both parts of this is key are not in use. Traffic signs are tagged using the traffic_sign key, which can take free text as value. Feel free to replace it by an official traffic sign number in case you know it.
Violaine_Do (2021-05-20 20:36:06+00:00): issue with traffic_sign is that horizontal marking is missing, will add it as a description as there is not traffic sign as understood by the wiki def for now. If you have a suggestion for horizontal marking i will take it! thks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104985690
Violaine_Do (2021-05-20 20:39:57+00:00): plus this was experimental tagging for a local prject on mobility, please next time ask before modifying...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104985690
mueschel (2021-05-20 20:44:06+00:00): Please don't invent new tags - these can not be understood by other mapers (as you can see here). In these cases, please add a description and a fixme yourself. In the best case, you can provide an image of the situation so that others have a clear idea what the situation is exactly.
mueschel (2021-05-20 20:47:15+00:00): If you use "experimental tagging" please mention it in the changeset comment. Make clear that the tag was intentional and not just a mistake or due to missing knowledge.
Violaine_Do (2021-05-20 20:49:41+00:00): yes of course, i should have documented it on a wiki page, still under process. I will document it here by next month : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:French_Polynesia/CartoMobilite/Tags
I am pretty sure local experimentation was possible in OSM, isn't it? I've seen osm tagging evolution based on experimental tagging so many times...
Violaine_Do (2021-05-20 20:50:08+00:00): thks for the clarification on experimental tagging!
Bert Araali (2021-06-02 01:20:56+00:00): You deleted a building (Plan B pub, now hanging idle) consisting of 3 units. Recent satellite imagery shows only the middle unit was demolished. Can you please add the remaining units back and consult the previous editor if the previous pub located there still exists ? Stop deletions please and use life cycle tagging so the current situation can be accurately verified in the field.  We have lots of mappers around in Kampala. "Imaginary buildings" as you call them were actually there recently, it doesn't improve the Kampala map to replace them with "imaginary deletions".
limes11 (2021-05-19 22:41:28+00:00): Hi, 

Is "British Empire" really appropriate for the UK, the Crown dependencies and the Overseas Territories?
It is a thing of the past and the term is rarely (or never) used for the UK and the remnants of former colonies. The term also has the corresponding connotation.

Definitely looks weird to me.
◪ Jarv (2021-05-19 22:53:05+00:00): Was an edit of this size put to the community?
I'd agree with limes11 and say that "British Empire" isn't suitable since its a defunct term and OSM is meant to show how the world is more or less at the current time, so adding this is of no benefit unlike the NATO one you also added.
dcapillae (2021-05-19 23:51:34+00:00): "The British Empire was..." (Wikipedia). The British Empire no longer exists. This type of historical boundaries has no place in OSM. See "Good practice": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features.

Please, move them to Open Historial Map or to another map where appropriate: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map. The history of the British Empire is very interesting, but the OSM map is not the right place for that.

Greetings from Spain.

Regards,

Daniel
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104985844
DankJae (2021-05-20 00:12:51+00:00): Hi.

The term "British Empire" shouldn't be used, it is an obsolete term. However, I do believe the edit had some reasoning. The existing "United Kingdom" relation is an odd one out in terms of territories, the relations for United States, Netherlands, Norway and France all have their territories included (ex. Antarctica). This relation should in my opinion be merged with the existing "United Kingdom" relation to make a final relation called "United Kingdom" (the preexisting relation) with its territories included, although if unsure put it to the community.
DankJae (2021-05-20 00:32:57+00:00): Although I'd like to mention that the UK does administer its overseas holdings differently than the other countries mentioned (likely explaining the prior arrangement), and they don't form part of the UK directly, but there is no longer a British Empire or an entity above the UK, so an alternative for this relation is needed or it be reverted.
woodpeck (2021-05-20 07:47:56+00:00): I have deleted this relation, for the reasons given above, and also because *if* one wanted to have a grouping like that in OSM it would be appropriate to add the individual pieces to a simple relation instead of creating yet another giant boundary relation that will attract edits whenever any of the constituting boundaries is edited.
ftcat (2021-05-20 07:50:50+00:00): Perhaps the relationship should be renamed the United Kingdom and Dependent Territories or similar. The British Empire is archaic with negative connotations and no longer exists. As regards moving it to Open Historical Map even that is not correct as it does not cover the entire extent of the British Empire. This is just not correct on any level.
JeroenvanderGun (2021-05-20 10:00:57+00:00): Hi all,

As far as I can tell, the name is historically correct, even though it may sound archaic nowadays. The term was at least still in use when Hong Kong left the Empire - which has been described by some as more or less the end of it, despite its clear continued effective administrative existence afterwards. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_evolution_of_the_British_Empire#Current_territories

The British Empire may have lost much of its territory, it never ceased to exist, and it still acts as one administrative entity in international relations. For this reason, there ought to be one overarching entity in OpenStreetMap, similar to the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and the Kingdom of Norway. There currently wasn't one.

Then there is the question of what name the relation should have. "British Empire" may indeed be dated. I'm open to suggestions for a different combination of name/int_name/alt_name/old_name. E.g. Norway has two relations named Norway (one including and one excluding overseas), so we could simply call both relations "United Kingdom".

W.r.t. relation type, a boundary relation is the appropriate way to model a sovereign state. E.g. Denmark, The Netherlands, and Norway also use a boundary relation for their sovereign boundaries. I am not aware of any alternative to a boundary relation that would be appropriate.

As a final note, the way I set up the boundary relation doesn't affect rendering of the territories on the map (no defined admin_level). It just allows to access the sovereign boundary via search/navigation.
RicoElectrico (2021-05-20 07:56:44+00:00): Hej, nie powinno się używać highway=pedestrian area=yes do miejsc które nie są placami. To powinno być zamiast tego area:highway=pedestrian/footway/itp. Prowadzenie routingu po obszarach nie jest możliwe.
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-20 00:12:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104987405, 104988061, 104986684 where the changeset comment is: revert nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-20 00:12:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104987405, 104988061, 104986684 where the changeset comment is: revert nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-20 00:12:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104987405, 104988061, 104986684 where the changeset comment is: revert nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-20 00:12:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104987405, 104988061, 104986684 where the changeset comment is: revert nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-20 00:12:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104987405, 104988061, 104986684 where the changeset comment is: revert nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-20 00:12:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104987405, 104988061, 104986684 where the changeset comment is: revert nationalist vandalism
fghj753 (2021-05-20 07:21:22+00:00): If you prefer English, let me know.

Tere.
Oled hiljuti lisanud kaardile mõned muudatuskogumid (104770258, 104957427, 104986112 ja 104986211).
1) Esiteks tahaksin korrata üle juhanjuku kommentaari aastast 2017 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54294579), et Eesti oludes on kõige mõistlikum kasutada Maa-ameti või Esri kaardikihti. (Kaardikihti vahetatakse kaardiredaktori parempoolse menüü keskmisest (ülevalt ja alt 5.) nupust.)
2) Nimi on väli, kuhu kirjutatakse selle konkreetse objekti (ametlik) nimi. Selleks, et kirjeldada teistele kasutajatele, mida sa kaardile lisasid, kasutatakse muid välju. Praegusel juhul lisasid sa Raua 55 ja Narva mnt 38 vahelisele parkimisplatsile pargi, mille nimi on Grass. Sama lugu on ka kõigi mänguväljakutega - Raua 32 parklas peaks sinu andmetel olema mänguväljak nimega Playground? Kui nime ei ole, siis jäta see lihtsalt kirjutamata.
2.1) Konkreetselt muruplatside jaoks on olemas silt `landuse=grass` ning veel paar alternatiivi.
3) OSMis laetakse muudatused kaardile sellise asjaga, mille nimi on muudatuskogum, mis on idee poolest samas piirkonnas tehtud muudatuste *kogum*. Ideaalis võiksid kõik sinu Kadriorus tehtud muudatused kuuluda ühte kogumisse, aga nad on tehtud eri päevadel. Kindlasti oleks võinud käesolev muudatuskogum sisaldada ka pitsakioski lisamist, sest nende lisamise vahe oli ainult 3 minutit. Kiosk ise on igati korrektne ning selle sisu osas kaebused puuduvad.
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-20 00:12:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104987405, 104988061, 104986684 where the changeset comment is: revert nationalist vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-20 00:12:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 104987405, 104988061, 104986684 where the changeset comment is: revert nationalist vandalism
rainerU (2021-05-20 08:17:45+00:00): Hallo,
du hast bei der Relation der Buslinie 70 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9312857 die Attribute type=route und route=bus gelöscht. Damit wird diese Relation von Renderern und Anwendungen nicht mehr als ÖPNV-Linie erkannt. Ich bitte dich, das zu korrigieren. 

Referenz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%96ffentlicher_Verkehr#Routenrelation

Grüße
Rainer