piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Viajero Perdido (2020-01-22 16:43:15+00:00): Hi AW.  If you're seeing patchy forest, that's typically from logging, "managed forest", and what appears bare in satellite view is usually freshly-planted forest; that almost always follows logging.  Small trees, true, but still forest.

When mapping forest, I ignore these cutblocks, but do take care to map around naturally bare ground, eg mountains at the treeline.
Cheeto (2020-01-22 16:44:33+00:00): This is an illegal import with foreign tags:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79929015
HanaumaBay (2020-01-22 19:30:56+00:00): Thanks for the message. I uploaded something by mistake. It has been removed.
ALu68 (2020-01-22 20:35:03+00:00): Hallo peggatsch0, willkommen bei OSM.

"Der Name des Waldstücks ist Aystetten Straßberg, deshalb könnte man diesen Weg so benennen." 
Welche Namen könnte man sich denn so für die anderen Wege ausdenken?
Entweder hat das Objekt einen offiziellen Namen oder einfach auch keinen. Es gibt jedoch noch Alternativen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names

Von Kunstnamen halte ich nichts.

Zu Beginn des editieren der Karte solltest du dich über die verschiedenen "Map Features" informieren: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features#Namen

Happy Mapping.
peggatsch01 (2020-01-23 08:33:42+00:00): Danke ALu68 für den Hinweis, daß, was Du sagst, ist für mich nachvollziehbar.
Habe den eingetragenen Wegnamen gerade wieder gelöscht.
Servus Peter
joost schouppe (2020-07-12 15:39:35+00:00): Hi JJJ,
Could you explain what these two big circles are that you added? It looks like an accidental upload.
JJJWegdam (2020-07-12 17:44:27+00:00): Hello Joost,
The big circles are circles with a known radius, that I import during edits. I use them to determine the curve radius of railway tracks, and delete them before I commit the changeset. It seems I forgot deleting them here. Do you need any help with removing them?
M!dgard (2020-07-12 23:54:41+00:00): If you'd like to avoid this in the future, I can recommend creating a custom validation rule. I created one for the buildings semi-import in Flanders. Dead simple!
https://framagit.org/Midgard/osm/-/blob/6dce9952/josm_validation_grb.validator.mapcss
joost schouppe (2020-07-13 07:33:38+00:00): Yeah, I fixed it for you, JJJ
JJJWegdam (2020-07-13 09:31:57+00:00): Oh cool! Didn’t know about those yet @M!dgard. Thx. Also cheers @joost for the help.
mavl (2020-01-29 17:56:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Glassman (2020-01-23 00:05:46+00:00): Tip: don't use descriptive names. The building has been fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79929637
viloan (2020-01-22 17:12:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2020-01-23 20:33:13+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Aus meiner Sicht ist das Wenden auf der Straße generell nicht erlaubt und muss deshalb nicht einzeln in der Karte eingzeichnet werden. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10616491
viloan (2020-01-22 17:58:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DUGA (2022-07-10 22:31:04+00:00): Please carefully check how we map trees.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood

For any trees inside the course, it is fine to micromap them.

Do not map for any games, do not use dated imageries (ESRI Clarity from 2010-2013) to update the map in 2020.
trigpoint (2020-01-22 18:10:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Adding objects that do not exist is not helpful. In both of you changesets you have added ponds where there are buildings in reality.

I have reverted both changesets.
Helpful2 (2020-01-22 18:23:38+00:00): Hi,

I work in a company who built the new playground in Northwood college for girls. The new playground also has a pond. It was not updated in any of the online maps, including google maps. Works have been finished in summer of 2019. I can attach some photos of new palyground with a pond if that helps.

The one next to Sandwell mansions, we have. Planning permission as there are plans to turn that ares into water reservoir or a pond. Works have not started yet, but I thought I'll update the map in advance. Probably wasn't the best idea.
trigpoint (2020-01-22 18:38:57+00:00): Hi, thank you for your response.

It is not a good idea to map things that are only planned.

You mapping was very suspicious as you have mapped multiple ponds in the same place. 

I do find it difficult to believe that part of the school would have been demolished to build an extremely large pond, it is larger than most swimming pools.
Helpful2 (2020-01-22 18:46:44+00:00): Hi, you're correct, I've done it wrong. There was no demolishing of a building. Nearby green area and trees have been removed in order to make space for the palyground and the pond. I couldn't figure it out how to expand school ground, so I selected any area to put the pond. I thought I'd be able to move it after it's been approved. Also it's definitely not as big as a swimming pool, I'll try to adjust the scale more accurately. I'll submit new Edit.

 Sorry for inconvenience caused.
Helpful2 (2020-01-22 18:47:43+00:00): Also multiple ponds in the same place. I did that in order to fill it fully? Otherwise it seems like there's land in the middle of the pond? Or does it get filled up after it's been approved?
trigpoint (2020-01-22 18:49:37+00:00): It does not need to be approved, but takes time to render on the main map.

The editor only shows the outline of objects, that is intentional.
angys (2020-01-23 07:47:07+00:00): 你好，請先不要將環狀線改為route，待1月31日過後才改成route，不然osm地鐵驗證器會顯示出錯，謝謝。
見：http://osm-subway.maps.me/taiwan.html
iWowik (2020-01-25 16:06:02+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо за уточнение карты. Я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, к тому же нарушаете порядок наименования улиц (не пишете слово улица).

Скажите пожалуйста, откуда вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их сложно найти.
mueschel (2020-01-23 19:46:53+00:00): Please make sure your tool doesn't create invalid tags like 'Nombre de niveaux (Rez-de-chaussée + étages, toit exclu) = XXX' and uses only English colour names, as documented in the Wiki.
PanierAvide (2020-01-24 08:01:46+00:00): Hello, thanks for your feedback. There was a misconfiguration in the tool, which is now fixed. I have done all necessary fixes and data should be good as now. Regards.
viloan (2020-01-22 18:54:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 22:10:47+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86155436
scai (2021-04-08 14:55:21+00:00): Hallo Vrifox,

du hattest hier cycleway:oneway=yes ergänzt. Kannst du kurz erklären was das bedeuten soll?
Gilt die Richtungsbeschränkung für beide Radwege? Oder nur für den Radweg, der dieselbe Richtung hat wie der Weg in OSM?
Letzteres scheint die Interpretation von OsmAnd zu sein, das Radrouting ist damit entsprechend eingeschränkt/kaputt. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob das eine Fehlinterpretation ist.
Bei cycleway:right:oneway=yes ist mir die Bedeutung vollkommen klar, bei cycleway:oneway=yes jedoch nicht. Kann das vielleicht einfach wieder weg?

Grüße
Alex
vrifox (2021-04-08 16:43:18+00:00): Hallo,

ja beide Radwege sind nur in eine Richtung legal zu benutzen. Ob mein tagging richtig ist, weiß ich nicht, scheint aber eigentlich recht üblich zu sein. Cyclosm erkennt diesen Tag aber glaube ich auch nicht.

Liebe Grüße
Vrifox
scai (2021-04-09 13:05:16+00:00): Alles klar. Das Tag scheint nicht sonderlich weit verbreitet zu sein und ich kann es auch nicht im OSM Wiki finden. Ich denke aber, die Verwendung ist korrekt und es ist ein Bug in OsmAnd. Habe dort ein entsprechendes Ticket angelegt (https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/11378).

Danke für deine schnelle Rückmeldung!

Grüße
Alex
abrensch (2020-01-26 08:56:10+00:00): Hallo Svalbard,

das klingt aber jetzt eher so, dass sich das agricultural auf das LKW-Verbot bezieht?

Weil für PKW gesperrt ist diese Strasse definitiv nicht:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=IVqrM7UNtH1KzO20z-7qbg&focus=photo&lat=53.904753023779854&lng=9.572595072170301&z=17&x=0.4930666753018741&y=0.5504570285731695&zoom=0

Gruss, Arndt
Svalbard (2020-01-27 17:21:35+00:00): Hallo Arndt,
neben der Begrenzung der Höchstgeschwindigkeit findet sich in dem Bereich das Zeichen DE:253. Darunter ein Schild mit der Aufschrift "land- u. forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei". Ich beziehe das auf das Zeichen DE:253, was ja aussagt: "Verbot für Kraftfahrzeuge mit einem zulässigen Gesamtgewicht über 3,5t, einschließlich ihrer Anhänger und Zugmaschinen, ausgenommen Personenkraftwagen und Kraftomnibusse." PKW wären damit also nicht erfasst. Moderne land- und forstwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge dürften die 3,5t locker überschreiten. Daher hat man wohl die zusätzliche Beschilderung angebracht.
Die access-Regelung für diese Fahrzeuge habe ich aus [1] übernommen. Wenn es eine bessere Möglichkeit des Taggings dieser Beschilderung gibt, ändere ich das gern ab. Gruß Dirk

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
PT-53 (2020-01-27 17:57:24+00:00): Hallo,
wie wäre es mit
hgv=agricultural
traffic_sign=DE:253,1026-36
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=253,1026-36
Grüße
Svalbard (2020-01-28 16:41:22+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
in meinen Augen ein guter Vorschlag. Werde ich so anwenden. Vielen Dank!
Gruß Dirk
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 22:10:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86155436
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 22:10:42+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86155436
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 21:46:45+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86154911
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 21:46:42+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86154911
SCNC (2020-01-22 20:11:36+00:00): Het zou beter zijn om je toevoeging als man_made tunnel in OSM te zetten, dan wordt het ondergrondse niet zichtbaar op de kaart, enkel voor zij die editten
KiaaTiX (2020-01-22 21:39:43+00:00): Het is even zoeken wat handig is. Het begaanbare deel van de tunnel is al als man_made=tunnel getagd.

indoor=wall + man_made=tunnel voor de muren kan denk ik wel. Er zijn niet echt veel voorbeelden van tunnelbuizen te vinden in OSM.
SCNC (2020-01-23 02:53:57+00:00): Er zijn niet veel tunnels in OSM, maar wel een groter aantal ondergrondse objecten. Maar deze worden zelden op dit detailniveau uitgewerkt, vaak enkel als vlak man_made in de contouren van object. Hierdoor zijn ze dan ook niet zichtbaar om Standard map.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 21:46:39+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86154911
PT-53 (2020-01-28 07:57:49+00:00): Hallo baindter,
diese Abbiegerelation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10616912/history
stimmt so nicht. 
Für eine "nur geradaus-Relation" müßte statt dem Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330524657
dieser Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99091955
als to-Way verwendet werden.
QS-Tool Turn Restriction:
https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/?zoom=19&lat=47.829364&lon=10.006852&layer=Grayscale&overlays=TTT
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction
OSM-Forums-Anfrage für eine andere falsche TR:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=771941#p771941
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-02-16 11:46:23+00:00): TR gelöscht
user_5359 (2020-01-23 20:28:49+00:00): Willlkommen bei OSM! Ich habe deinen SEO SPAM Eintrag gelöscht (nur Name und Beschreibung, keine brauchbaren Informationen). Sollte das ein Fehler sein, kannst Du dich hier melden und wir werden Dir helfen, die Daten wieder herzustellen. Als deutsche Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie beschreibe ich was?“ empfehle ich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a (Vorsicht: Viele Information damit lange Ladezeiten)
dgitto (2020-10-06 14:31:56+00:00): l'incrocio https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79936349
non è una rotatoria
junction=roundabout non ci va
MrDo (2020-10-06 18:01:01+00:00): in verità si definirebbe comunque rotatoria anche se può trarre in inganno, i sensi di marcia indicati erano comunque corretti.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 21:46:35+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86154911
viloan (2020-01-22 20:18:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 21:46:33+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86154911
eggie (2020-01-22 22:25:37+00:00): Dag John.. Je vraagt om een review.. Editor iD heeft de neiging om de wegen overal aan vast te plakken. Dus goed inzoomen. Wanneer je de linker alttoets gebruikt tijdens intekenen plakt het niet. Nu zit je highway=residential vast aan de landuse = grass
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-22 22:26:38+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79936954
eggie (2020-01-22 22:36:39+00:00): De Lengelseweg heb ik een straatnaam gegeven en losgemaakt  van de landuse.
De highway=footway heb ik even omgezet naar een highway=path conform de andere paden.
Wanneer er een bord wandelpad staat (rond blauw bord) dan is het wel een footway.
Waarom is het eerste stuk een rsidential en de rest een unclassified? Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-22 23:00:29+00:00): Het stukje residential heb ik op access=private gezet, want hier stond altijd een bordje art .461 wvs
Het zou anders gaan routeren voor janenalleman. 
Gr eggie
GerdP (2022-07-17 09:06:01+00:00): Moin!
Ich meine, dass dieser Weg https://www.osm.org/way/135803481
ein reiner Fußweg ist. Vom südlichen Ende habe ich ein aktuelles Foto mit einem VZ 239. Ausserdem bleibt der Weg separat neben dem Barneführerholzweg. Die grün-weissen Schilder stehen allerdings am Fußweg, was ziemlich verwirrend ist. Hast Du andere Infos?
GerdP (2022-07-17 15:53:11+00:00): Hab gerade das schöne Wetter genutzt und die Stelle angeschaut. Ist so, wie ich es beschrieben habe. Werde  das entsprechend korrigieren.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-21 13:21:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81318595 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical edits, where other mappers have not since edited, mainly in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3511 and previous blocks for details
nw520 (2020-05-17 10:45:45+00:00): Hi emvee,
I've partially reverted your change at n266653407 since there actually is a crossing without any traffic signals for cars.
emvee (2020-05-17 10:57:36+00:00): Looking at the history of n266653407 that makes sense and not sure why I changed it, so thanks!

An alternative could be to use "traffic_signals=continuous_green", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals but not sure that is better, I leave that to you.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-21 13:21:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81318595 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical edits, where other mappers have not since edited, mainly in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3511 and previous blocks for details
fx99 (2020-04-14 03:56:31+00:00): Hallo, habe den Eintrag auf OSM Standard "geradegezogen". Bei Fragen bitte melden.
Glassman (2020-01-23 00:10:13+00:00): Nice job - you even got the runway length in meters.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79938706
Jeffrey_CH (2020-01-22 22:04:22+00:00): @Romain1228: please stop vandalize this node. Population and place-type should be correct for maps renderer.
felipeeugenio (2020-03-09 20:01:29+00:00): Hola Felipe
Estos no son Campings.
ponerlos como barrios porfa. saludos
xhzyh1 (2020-01-24 11:41:34+00:00): Hi.
I'm so sorry about changeset 79895704.I didn't check the wiki at that time because there aren't any similar tags on Line 1.I'm sorry for the problem.Thank you for fixing them.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-21 13:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81318595 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical edits, where other mappers have not since edited, mainly in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3511 and previous blocks for details
Hb- (2020-02-09 13:22:13+00:00): By moving node 7107923227 to the "legal" you neglected :
1. The sidewalk along the Bermagui Road 
2. The footpath from that sidewalk to the western side of the Princess Hwy (below bridge),
3. The fence at the borders of the park and 
4. The small stream at the eastern border of the park.

All mentioned facts above are clearly visible on the LPI NSW aerial.

Please repair the damages you made.
Warin61 (2020-02-09 22:08:28+00:00): Not damage. While these things may be visible, they may not define the park boundaries. Where OSM has the legal boundaries they should be considered. 

Sidewalks can be part of landuse=highway, not part of the park. 

Fences have not been mapped, they may not be the park boundaries. Some place their fences well inside boundaries in order to avoid surveying fees. The council may put a fence between the road and foot path to increase safety and stop people parking within the park. So a fence cannot be taken as the parks actual boundary. 

The 'stream' may not be part of the park, but an easement through properties. 

A local with more knowledge might extend the park at the rear of Nos 5, 7 and 9 Cobargo Bermagui Rd .. but that requires knowledge neither of us have.
Hb- (2020-02-10 13:24:21+00:00): Surely you damaged the parks mapping. It  was based on the On the Ground Rule, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground. As this page says, the local legislation should NOT be considered if not bound to reality.

If you do not have enough knowledge to accept a fence around a park as boundary of this park, then this is your issue.

While reverting your tagging I did you a favour and created a copy of your data with the parks 'legal boundaries' in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80797958.
aharvey (2020-02-17 04:29:00+00:00): I agree with Hb- here, we should map what's on the ground, the park in OSM should match where it exists on the ground, not where the legal boundaries are, which is in link with he good practice guideline Hb- pointed out.
Warin61 (2020-02-17 04:45:40+00:00): The only 'boundary on the ground' is a fence line to the north. I do not see anything else where. 
The present OSM boundary looks to encroach on the residential property to the east according to the LPI base Map.  Elsewhere the OSM boundary looks to be arbitrary.
aharvey (2020-02-17 05:14:30+00:00): I haven't been here and don't have the local knowledge, but from what I can see from the aerial imagery it looks perfectly mapped now, and when comparing with the LPI Basemap it looks contained within the two lots of the park.
Warin61 (2020-02-17 08:01:08+00:00): The 'errors' are less than 5 metres, not worth the trouble.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 21:46:31+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86154911
Alecs01 (2020-01-25 09:38:24+00:00): Grazie delle aggiunte, ricordati però di non attaccare gli edifici al centro della strada. Come immagini per ricalcarli, ti consiglierei Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta, sono più nitide e meglio georeferite di quelle di Bing, anche se più vecchie.
luisforte (2020-01-23 00:05:21+00:00): Viva João, boa noite.
Uma pequena nota sobre o estacionamento relativamente ao "Pequeno Parque": utilizamos amenity=parking, e não leisure=park para um espaço de estacionamento, dado que park é um espaço verde amplo. Convirá corrigir, quando tiveres oportunidade. Não sendo "Pequeno Parque" o nome oficial, é escusado pôr qualquer designação
Luis