piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Map-Peter (2022-09-25 14:06:02+00:00): Genau genommen könntest du bitte gleich das Buschland und das Wisentreservat voneinander trennen, denn außer Wiese und Gewässer gibt es noch mehr Flächen die kein Buschland sind im Wisentreservat. Dann kann man das alles detaillierter erfassen. Danke
jqngarcia (2022-09-13 10:16:11+00:00): L'estatua de Toni Bou es a la rotonda amb el carrer Balmes
fkv (2022-09-13 14:20:57+00:00): Ich weiß nicht, ob dein Edit dran schuld ist, aber du hast das Multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4802231 zuletzt bearbeitet und das ist jetzt kaputt.
Girolamo (2022-09-13 14:43:47+00:00): War falsch eingezeichnet. Ja, muss ich noch ändern. Wohngebiet umfasst jedenfalls nicht die Klinik Hietzing und nicht die Wälder/Parks.
fkv (2022-09-13 14:58:29+00:00): Parks kann man als Teil des Wohngebiets sehen und in Krankenhäusern wohnen Menschen (stationäre Patienten, oft auch Wohngebäude für Personal oder Schüler), aber mir ist vor allem wichtig, dass es keine weiße Flecken im Landuse gibt.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
habi (2023-06-15 08:01:04+00:00): Ciao pesuko
Du schreibst 'Bezeichung', dann würde ich das nicht in den Namen packen, sondern - laut OSM Wiki - in `description`.
Gruss aus dem Liebefeld,
habi

PS; Ich bin hier wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3732843, was mich auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092962074/ führt, wo du auch eine Bezeichnung in den Namen gepackt hast.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Piskvor (2022-09-13 09:23:18+00:00): Hello, thanks for the update.
However, "bridge=yes, highway=construction, access=no, foot=designated", means "there's already a bridge here, and a highway is being constructed, and foot access is granted," which is overly optimistic here :)

I have retagged to the "construction:" namespace here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126123071
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
LockOnGuy (2022-09-13 10:01:47+00:00): What is this?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Gigildas (2022-09-13 08:35:23+00:00): Source : https://www.ville-bedee.fr/admin/upload/BEDEE_PLAN_2013_ville_HD.pdf
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-14 14:44:45+00:00): Hallo pbkawph,

was genau bedeutet "laut Liegenschaftskarte"?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
pbkawph (2022-09-15 18:30:10+00:00): Das sind die offiziellen Karten der Vermessungsämter und Behörden.
Ich hatte diese fü diesen Bereich vorliegen und daher die Hausnummern eingetragen welche in diesen Karten hinterlegt sind.
pbkawph (2022-09-15 18:31:13+00:00): Ich könnte anhand dieser auch die Grundstücksgrenzen einzeichnen. Aber das wäre wohl zu viel des guten.
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-16 17:26:11+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung!

Die Karten der Vermessungsämter sind leider keine zulässige Quelle für OSM (Copyright). Grundsätzlich sollte nichts aus anderen Karten und Datenbanken kopiert werden. Es gibt Bundesländer in denen das erlaubt ist, aber in Niedersachsen leider nicht. 

Daher müssen diese Daten leider wieder gelöscht werden. Außer Du kannst belegen, dass es eine Genehmigung gibt und die Lizenz zu OSM kompatibel ist.
pbkawph (2022-09-16 18:44:08+00:00): Es wurde nichts kopiert sondern abgeschrieben. So gesehen gibt es auch kein Problem mit einem Copyright
pbkawph (2022-09-16 18:44:50+00:00): Den Reitplatz habe ich auch nur anhand der Satellitenbilder eingezeichnet.
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-17 18:02:43+00:00): "Es wurde nichts kopiert sondern abgeschrieben. So gesehen gibt es auch kein Problem mit einem Copyright"

Ich hoffe, diese Aussage ist nicht ernst gemeint.

Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Legal_FAQ#Darf_ich_von_Google,_Vermessungs%C3%A4mtern_oder_anderen_%C3%A4hnlichen_Quellen_kopieren?

Ich werde die Änderung rückgängig mache. Ich weiß, dass das ärgerlich ist, weil es Zeit und Aufwand kostet. Aber abgesehen von der rechtlichen Situation, sind vor Ort überprüfte Daten ein Qualität- und Alleinstellungsmerkmal von OSM!
pbkawph (2022-09-18 09:59:14+00:00): Ok, den Reitplatz würde ich wieder über die Setellitenkartenfunktion einzeichnen. Das sollte ja kein Problem sein. Die Huasnummern vefifiziere ich dann später nochmal beim nächsten Besuch.
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-18 12:00:45+00:00): Danke für Dein Verständnis und schön, dass Du Dich davon  nicht abschrecken lässt weiter mitzumachen! :-)

Grundsätzlich gilt für die Satellitenbilder das gleiche wie für Karten und andere Quellen. Wir dürfen sie nicht einfach für OSM benutzen. Für die Luft- und Satellitenbilder, die Dir im Onlineeditor iD angezeigt werden, haben wir aber die Erlaubnis diese zu verwenden. Solange Du nur diese benutzt ist alles in Butter! ;-) Die Satellitenbilder von Google Maps/ Earth dürfen wir z.B. nicht benutzen.

Bei den Satellitenbilder muss man nur daran denken, dass diese meistens ein paar Jahre alt sind. Das Alter der Bilder der unterschiedlichen Anbieter (Microsoft Bing, Maxar, Esri, usw.) sind auch unterschiedlich alt.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Carto_Graph (2022-09-14 09:11:55+00:00): building=yes случайно убрали?
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Carto_Graph (2022-09-14 09:15:44+00:00): Слово "магазин" в названии не пишется. Достаточно правильно выбранной категории.
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-13 10:38:14+00:00): 1. W godzinach otwarcia zamiast "sa" powinno być "Sa"
2. Nie ma potrzeby powtarzać informacji o fryzjerze w nazwie i tagu
3. Nazwa nie powinna być cały czas caps lockiem.
4. W numerze telefonu brakuje po plusie numeru kierunkowego
5. Panią Ewę można wpisać jako operator
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-13 10:38:53+00:00): 6. Czemu w image jest link do strony?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
aTarom (2022-09-14 10:30:06+00:00): Hola, que tienen mal los

building=apartments

para pasarlo a un menos descriptivo

building=yes

?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385981298/history
Frans S (2022-09-13 09:27:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Please improve your knowledge hot to tag roads. 




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126122777
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-14 17:16:50+00:00): Good to see businesses adding themselves on the map. 

One minor thing - waffles in cuisine is written in many ways, I'd suggest to just use "waffle". It's documented in the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Acuisine%3Dwaffle
Also, you can always check how much a certain tag value is used here
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cuisine#values
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-14 17:19:03+00:00): And remove 'kohvik' from there
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-14 17:22:05+00:00): You can also add
diet:gluten_free=yes or even diet:gluten_free=only

to the tags.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:diet
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
paganella31 (2023-03-01 20:49:24+00:00): source: Viabilità Forestale PAT (CC0) - https://siat.provincia.tn.it/geonetwork/srv/ita/catalog.search#/metadata/p_TN:3a021ec0-e603-4b64-a118-315d80c3339b
BCNorwich (2022-09-13 13:22:44+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Has your company replaced the business called 'Elite' in the end unit? If so then your company details should be replacing Elites details. Need any help just ask.

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Piskvor (2022-09-13 09:25:55+00:00): (možná bych i tu trať a cesty na mostě vrátil do proposed: to ještě potrvá nejmíň dva roky, než se vůbec začnou stavět)
Piskvor (2022-09-13 11:25:08+00:00): Přetagováno (nový stav byl detailnější, ale upravil jsem do aktuální podoby "tohle všechno je naplánováno ke stavbě, AŽ bude stát ten most, na kterým to má ležet")
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126128866
andyonthewings (2022-09-13 16:41:26+00:00): Since 潮味苑 is not occupying the whole building, it's better to use a point to denote 潮味苑 instead of setting the name of the building.
Kovoschiz (2022-09-14 06:25:18+00:00): Also `level:ref=G` is `level=0`.
Dodko (2022-09-13 13:30:28+00:00): Ak bol prameň upravený človekom pridajte značku
refitted=yes 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:Tag:refitted%3Dyes

to že jazierko nemá slanú vodu nie je nutné vo vnútrozemí dávať, tu máme všade sladkú vodu

Do názvu objektu nepridávame opisné názvy (ulica, lavička, prameň) ak má prameň naozaj názov Čelno tak bez slova prameň, to už vyjadruje značka natural=spring
rarad74 (2022-09-13 19:26:53+00:00): Salut. Tu faci poligoanele astea extrem de colturoase si cu putine detalii din punct de vedere al geometriei. Cred ca avem suficiente resurse ca sa poata randa  si cu ceva detalii mai mari. De la distanta se vede ceva neclar de ca si cum ar fi folosit un agoritm de simplificare a geometriei.
Ionut Paduretu (2022-09-14 06:44:17+00:00): Salutare! Pot încerca să fac poligoanele mai rotunde, în limita în care nu mă intersectez cu un poligon care deja are vreo 2000 de point-uri pe way-ul său. Legat de claritate, toate modificările mele urmăresc relieful regiunii, care e neregulat, peste tot pe unde am pus o fâșie de pădure sunt de fapt muchii de deal sau văile unor pârâuri. Randarea e conform realității. Eu personal prefer poligoanele mai reliefate pentru că pot fi folosite în drumeții, când îți alegi traseul. Vechile poligoane arătau ok de la zoom level mai mic de 12 dar erau mai puțin practice.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Carto_Graph (2022-09-14 09:25:08+00:00): Категория в названии не пишется.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ma-rt-in (2022-09-15 17:08:33+00:00): Hallo,

bitte als network nicht mehr HVV sondern "Hamburger Verkehrsverbund" verwenden.
jcr83 (2022-09-13 14:12:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne vois pas de balise de CO dans votre modification !
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 05:17:55+00:00): name=غسان صايمة حمصي للتمديدات الصحية
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10020503156

shop=غسان_صايمة_حمصي_للتمديدات_الصحية ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?

(if anyone wants I can provide list of weird shop values in some country/area - let me know if you are interested, some are already at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mateusz_Konieczny/unusual_shop_values )
Dodko (2022-09-13 13:25:32+00:00): Pre park je lepšie nakresliť ako plochu, nie iba jeden bod.
A určite mu nedávať adresu.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:leisure%3Dpark

ak je to naozaj záhrada tak značka
leisure=garden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden
maraf24 (2022-10-25 07:57:44+00:00): Zobacz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=51.11013%2C17.05313%3B51.11226%2C17.04984#map=18/51.11117/17.05105

Po tych zmianach przejazd rowerem został zablokowany na tym odcinku:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455337161
Mordechai23 (2022-10-27 14:14:43+00:00): dałem bicycle=yes
Kovoschiz (2022-09-13 11:29:08+00:00): `cuisine=coffee_shop`  means it provides coffee shop food. It is already an `amenity=cafe`.
andyonthewings (2022-09-13 16:37:59+00:00): cuisine=cafe is indeed somewhat redundant. Maybe adding cuisine=western is more appropriate.
treestryder (2022-12-31 03:07:04+00:00): Nice to see! I just updated the canoe/paddle craft/water trail mapping guidance on the Michigan wiki page and have _just_ started to work on a OpenStreetBrowser category to show them. In fact, it was how I found you had mapped this. You can follow along, and/or join in, here:
https://openstreetbrowser.org/#categories=custom/983c2b4b442f4930c972587f0d3792e2
LockOnGuy (2022-09-13 13:31:26+00:00): You said "alien alphabet corrected" but ain't Syriac is the mother and spoken language in this area by the Christians?
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 05:53:39+00:00): Ain't ?
You are Irish ?
OK.
It is the mother tongue, but it is not recognized by the constitution. Your rules say that ONLY the formal language must appear on the tag "Name". It is your rule not mine not OSMAND's. Be a man not a racist.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-14 07:30:06+00:00): >You are Irish?          
No, I'm Iraqi.          
    
>but it is not recognized by the constitution.
Wrong, it is recognized in the constitution as a minority official language, read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Iraq#Official_languages:~:text=Term%20%22Syriac%22%20(Arabic%3A%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9%20/%20al%2Dsuriania)%5B12%5D%5B13%5D%20is%20used%20in%20the%20Constitution%20as%20an%20official%20designation%20for%20the%20minority%20language%20of%20Neo%2DAramaic%2Dspeaking%20communities
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 08:03:34+00:00): Iraqi but living in Ireland.
Alright. The Iraqi constitution  says "The Assyrian language does exist in Iraq" but it does not say "It should appear in the tag NAME in OSM".
The rules that you have invented from your imagination, you have to obey.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-14 08:59:13+00:00): Hello,        
           
>Iraqi but living in Ireland.         
Still, no. I don't know what is your point of this. what's wrong if someone is Irish or lives in Ireland? you previously called me American many times and did not answer when I asked why you're saying this. There is nothing wrong with being an Irish, British, or American who edits in Iraq. Anyone can edit anything here in OSM. Is it maybe I use English in my changeset comments? Well, that's because English is the most known language, and it makes it easier to understand for all mappers.        
        
>The Iraqi constitution says "The Assyrian language does exist in Iraq"
No, it says it is an official language that's recognized and used by law.       
You said "alien alphabet corrected." in "in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126162367" how is it "alien" if it's the mother language of the native people who live here for thousands of years? then you said "No one can read this script except 200 people in the whole country." which is disrespectful by watering down the numbers of the existing 500k Christians who read this in Iraq. This town is 99% and that is why we used Syriac in the name tag alongside Kurdish, the language the others speak outside and the nearby areas of this town.              
               
I've sent you tens of messages trying to explain OSM rules to you and you keep cussing me and using bad words.            
                
Please behave.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 09:06:20+00:00): Not origin is not important. The important thing is that you change the maps of Iraq from America.
You are watering down the number of Kurds in Kirkuk.
In kirkuk, some vicinities are 100% kurds and you do not accept kurdish names.
I didnt cuss you .
The tens of your messages are not clear and contain false numbers.
You insist that Arabs are more in Kirkuk.
You brought this number from your Bible not the office of statistics of Iraq.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 09:08:09+00:00): Plus :   the dwellers of Ankawa do not understand that alphabet.
Most of them are Pure Arabs.
True that their religion is christian but their mother tongue is chaldean and Arabic
Correct your false information please