piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
keiner (2023-01-12 16:32:32+00:00): Guten Tag skyper, danke für die Nachfrage. Wenn es anschließend alles korrekt ist, ist das ja sinnvoll, egal was OSMAnd damit macht... Aber vor meiner ersten Bearbeitung war definitiv ein echter Fehler vorhanden. Der sollte dann natürlich nicht wieder erscheinen. Also gerne die Kreuzung korrekt gestalten (wie auch immer), ein schlichtes "alles zurücksetzen" auf den Stand bevor ich es angefasst habe erscheint mir allerdings nicht Zielführend.
Grüße keiner
skyper (2023-01-12 17:35:56+00:00): Hey,
habe außer dem fehlenden durchgezogenen Streifen keine Fehler entdeckt. Es wäre interessant womit OSMAnd Probleme hat, daher sollte die Kreuzung in diesem Zustand bleiben und falls es wieder falsche Ansagen gibt, dies OSMAnd mit Verweis auf die Kreuzung mitgeteilt werden.
Viele Grüße,
skyper

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131198440)
Frans S (2022-10-14 12:55:33+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway ---
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127120246
SzymonH (2022-10-07 06:20:24+00:00): Thanks! Sorry for mistake xd
Ygramul (2022-10-07 06:23:07+00:00): No worries. Happens to all of us at times :-)
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:48:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
See my comment on another changeset.
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127120415
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:47:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
From 2 buildings, which were oversize mapped, you just squared them without correcting the mapping.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127120510
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:41:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
However, the road is wrongly tagged. In rural areas roads are never tagged as residential (unclassified in this case)
Tagging of highways:
 
 African countries:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127120579
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:29:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
A remark, not all buildings are strict rectangular. Buildings sometimes have an extension. Draw them as well.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127120609
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:21:31+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, a few tall buildings are incorrect mapped. See the hints at the bottom how to map tall buildings. (map the rooflines and move the whole mapping to the footprint.)

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127120913
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:18:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Just 1 remark. On 1 location, you tagged a path as footpath. highway=path is a better tag.  Footway is more for isolated footpaths in urban areas.
Best regards

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127120943
Geim (2022-12-07 14:00:43+00:00): Hallo Winschu, 
ik heb de tag amenity=library van het gebouw gehaald, deze stond al op de adresnode, zoals gebruikelijk in OSM.
Frans S (2022-11-04 11:39:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
On this task, you tagged several highways incorrect.
Please refresh your knowledge about the tagging of highways in this region. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Highways leading to hamlets, villages etc. are not to be mapped as a track. Try to identify roads which connect to other settlements, unclassified highways. 
Best regards
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:06:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but some of your mappings are not correct drawn  and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
The majority is well mapped.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127121280
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-10-07 12:19:32+00:00): Добрый день.

>addr:postcode=188508

Подскажите, по какому принципу присваиваются почтовые коды? 188508 это очень далеко (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181631184), у них в Новогорелово своё есть (188510, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9718308853). Может быть, его надо ставить?
anastasia_ (2022-10-11 21:15:23+00:00): Добрый день.
Да, вы правы. Поправила.
Спасибо!
abakus_uploader (2022-10-07 22:32:45+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Robert Whittaker (2023-02-22 15:37:06+00:00): Hi Phil,

In this changeset you created the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10080826333 . This appears to duplicate a pre-existing bank node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6871715012 .

I presume this was a mistake. But should the first node above be deleted, or did you e.g. intend to add a second ATM at that position?
ZenPhil (2023-02-22 16:16:03+00:00): Hi Robert - the intention was to note both the bank (and its internal facilities eg ATMs which are limited by opening hours) and the separate outdoor ATM (which is not restricted). Does the current format work or should it be consolidated to one node?
Robert Whittaker (2023-02-26 19:09:37+00:00): I'm not sure if it was deliberate or not, but both of the two nodes above have amenity=bank on them. This is wrong, as it means that the OSM data is recording two banks there, when in reality there is only one.

To capture the situation you describe, I would probably have one amenity=bank node for the bank itself with (with atm=yes on it if you want), and then one amenity=atm for each of the physical ATMs. The one inside the bank could have indoor-=yes to distinguish it. You can add appropriate opening_hours to all three objects.
ZenPhil (2023-02-27 11:05:43+00:00): Thanks - I see the issue now, I think it was an error by me to tag it as a bank. Should be fixed now.
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:02:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* The shadow of a building included in your mapping.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127122880
Frans S (2022-10-07 13:57:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127122889
tobji (2022-10-17 21:15:34+00:00): In the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Park you added buildings tagged https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club. Are you sure this is right?
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-22 02:01:46+00:00): Reverted in:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135213900
Frans S (2022-10-07 13:56:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Did you use the correct imagery?  Esri world Imagery shows a perfect picture. Easy to map.
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127123215
Frans S (2022-10-07 10:03:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
You mapped a number of residential areas around a block of buildings. Usually they encircle a hamlet, compete village or towns. Districts are also mapped that way.
You mapped them also rather sloppy, crossing buildings.
Another issue: You mapped buildings but did not tag them. Each building should be tagged as building=yes.
Don't forget to square each building with the Q key.
I will review your other changesets as well and will comment on them if there is reason to do so.
Best regards and keep mapping



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127123241
Frans S (2022-10-14 12:54:21+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway ---
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127123799
Frans S (2022-10-07 10:35:42+00:00): here you tagged blocks of buildings as landuse=industrial. Do you have local knowledge? 
Otherwise don't map landuse . See my previous comment.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127124334
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 05:31:27+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
DressyPear4 (2022-10-07 03:58:58+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta. Também não deve ser adicionado informações pessoais.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127124663
Florestas Osm (2022-10-07 20:16:23+00:00): Olá, obrigado pelo feedback, vou providenciar as correções.
Firefishy (2022-10-07 05:55:07+00:00): Aweome first edit! Thank you for helping improve the map. Any more greatly appreciated. Try https://every-door.app/ (iphone and android) for adding missing features from your phone.
MKnight (2022-10-07 12:34:30+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe diese Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, da sowohl Strassengeometrie verschoben wurden als auch Gebäude.
umapjpnic793 (2022-10-10 13:50:12+00:00): Hi, it seems unlikely to find large hospital in this building.
simply consider using amenity=clinic, amenity=doctors for that ophthalmology.
thanks. :)
joel56dt (2022-10-07 16:23:46+00:00): Great edit. You captured all the languages, names, and even the date range of the old name. Thanks!
felipeeugenio (2022-10-07 11:45:30+00:00): Hola
una posta no es un hospital. hay distintos tags para distintas categorías de atención de salud.
saludos
AgusQui (2022-10-22 03:25:15+00:00): Ya te había explicado que no tiene sentido ni está documentado agregar bus=yes a paradas con highway=bus_stop. Dejá de seguir como tonto las recomendaciones del editor iD.
maro21 (2022-10-08 19:29:12+00:00): - Why did you remove proper name "Lotto" from lottery shops?
- https://osm.org/node/7281072859 Why did you change the operator of the ATM?
- https://osm.org/node/6184162249 Why did you change Pizza Hut to a restaurant?
- https://osm.org/node/7281072861 Why did you change the operator from Euronet to Millennium?
+ the same things I wrote in https://osm.org/changeset/127130593
maro21 (2022-10-08 19:34:13+00:00): - https://osm.org/node/5316824818 Why did you remove the name from pawnbroker?
- https://osm.org/node/7253700559 Why did you change the ATM's operator? I was there and added this ATM after a survey. Crédit Agricole is not an operator.
- https://osm.org/node/6725268155 Why did you remove the name of this shop?
- https://osm.org/node/6361234274 Why did you change the name?
+ The same I wrote in https://osm.org/changeset/127130593
榛果麵包 (2022-10-07 04:01:13+00:00): 本人當地人，道路已拆除! 另外已變更為公園，請不要變更為"施工"，以免影響寶可夢地圖圖資問題!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Mordechai23 (2022-10-08 10:56:28+00:00): Why did you delete element in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14663642
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14580435
Those relations worked perfectly fine
Mordechai23 (2022-10-08 10:57:58+00:00): Also "Various fixes" is not a helpful comment at all

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2022-10-12 14:10:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.  We welcome you as a new mapper.
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped as requested. 
We do not expect that your mappings are perfect, but they are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
You just mapped a rectangular form of houses with an annex or extension. You need to follow the rooflines as accurate as possible.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127129593
okadatsuneo (2022-10-07 04:32:26+00:00): sourceにMapillaryが抜けました。
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Dodko (2022-10-09 08:16:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66707245
preklep v názve
mapperue (2022-11-03 06:25:12+00:00): Vďaka za upozornenie.
maro21 (2022-10-08 18:29:15+00:00): Have you ever been to Wrocław? Why are you changing data collected on the ground to some random names and tags?
- https://osm.org/node/3772479527 - there is no "Santander" bank here, there is Santander Consumer Bank.
- https://osm.org/node/7289612070 - Why didn't you removed mBank? It is an mBank ATM.
- ATMs don't have names, please don't add them.
- From the fact that the ATM is operated by Euronet, it doesn't follow that the brand is also Euronet, it can be under the brand of different banks
- Żabka's don't have Russian names. Where did you see them?
- https://osm.org/node/7251425498 - why did you changed the name?
- Why did you change Avon to a cosmetics shop?
- https://osm.org/node/2723958463 why did you change the name from "Apart Exclusive" to "Apart"?
- Why did you remove cuisine from McDonald's restaurants?
- Why are you changing main tags like here? https://osm.org/node/7917313365
- https://osm.org/node/5757255275 - Why did you changed the name?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
maro21 (2022-10-08 19:47:11+00:00): - https://osm.org/node/2442645755 Why did you remove the name?
- https://osm.org/node/6871994897 Why did you remove cafe?
- https://osm.org/node/3180727291 Why did you remove the information about the brand?
- https://osm.org/node/3180727286 Why did you remove the name?
- https://osm.org/way/1098353774 Why did you change the tagging? What was wrong?
- https://osm.org/way/302665260 Why did you change the tagging? What was wrong?
- https://osm.org/node/3067641669 Why did you remove the name?
- https://osm.org/node/7253695469 Why did you remove the information about the brand?
+ Things I wrote in https://osm.org/changeset/127130593
maraf24 (2022-10-17 10:20:03+00:00): Wycofane.
maro21 (2022-11-23 22:15:46+00:00): Dzięki!