piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-05 02:15:28+00:00): It is necessary when other languages are present.  It is unnecessary when no other languages are present.
Trevor_1 (2022-06-05 02:23:03+00:00): I'd say these changesets should probably be reverted, if possible. Most of the cities I've looked at didn't have other languages
literan (2021-11-08 17:38:14+00:00): чего это вдруг Перекресток только кошерную продукцию стал продавать?)) свинины там полно.
Glassman (2021-11-08 18:25:38+00:00): #TIP: Strava heatmaps can be used. Check out the instructions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava. Note it's a bit of a pain since the strava keypairs only work for a week or so and then must be renewed. But if the trail is heavily traveled, it gives must better resolution than a single gpx trace.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113500469
clay_c (2021-12-31 03:10:06+00:00): Hi Nick,

The platforms at Clybourn were intentionally divided down the middle to preserve information about which routes stop on which side, as well as avoid creating multipolygons. Technically it could be mapped either way, but as a railway mapper, I find it easier to maintain when platforms are mapped as ways without multipolygon relations. I hope you don't mind me changing it back.

-Clay
nickvet419 (2024-07-15 18:02:31+00:00): There is a newer way of tagging platforms that serve multiple lines. see railway=platform_edge
mariotomo (2021-11-12 23:05:52+00:00): Hola Alvarado2510. Definitivamente no vas a utilizar las sugerencias que te se ofrecen?
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111517549
Sousa00 (2021-11-08 06:06:56+00:00): eee
Uanraf (2021-11-08 09:13:40+00:00): Si?
mweper (2021-11-08 11:50:02+00:00): Hola Marisa. ¿Que es lo que quisiste mapear aquí? Por favor, no dejes elementos en el mapa sin etiquetar y recuerda que aquí solo se añaden elementos que existen en la realidad (con algunas pocas excepciones).
Cualquier duda que tengas, puedes contactarme por privado o con la comunidad a través de https://wiki.osm.org/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina#Contacto
Noobiemapper (2021-11-10 16:06:04+00:00): Hey there :)

I changed Horicon back to being a city, as confirmed by the state's official list at https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/vitalrecords/cvtlist.pdf
mweper (2021-11-08 11:49:26+00:00): Hola Marisa. ¿Que es lo que quisiste mapear aquí? Por favor, no dejes elementos en el mapa sin etiquetar y recuerda que aquí solo se añaden elementos que existen en la realidad (con algunas pocas excepciones).
Cualquier duda que tengas, puedes contactarme por privado o con la comunidad a través de https://wiki.osm.org/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina#Contacto
MapTheWalk (2021-11-14 05:05:13+00:00): Hi AndrewWizit, this shop is already mapped as a pastry shop a few meters away. I have deleted the repeated node for this reason.
ravali_78 (2021-11-09 07:47:19+00:00): HI Zayne Chin,
I have Fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with highways.Kindly check with node 9237214505,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113552751.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113501247
mariotomo (2021-11-08 14:11:51+00:00): Alvarado, aprecio que no hayas puesto vías ficticias en el cruce con la doble calzada residencial, sin embargo el resultado no está bien. lo mejoraré en los próximos días, y te invito a preguntar lo que no se entiende. Revisa mientras tanto la página wiki que describe los turn:lanes.
mariotomo (2021-11-08 14:07:32+00:00): Alvarado2510, por favor, nos ponemos de acuerdo si mapear para el router? he estado cambiando varios cruces que estaban como este que acabas de añadir.
Glassman (2021-11-08 03:17:32+00:00): You changed a Shell Food Mart to a Jacksons. I don't believe we have any of the Jackson's convenience stories in the area. Where are you getting your information? Are you familiar with this area?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113501305
archpdx (2021-11-08 03:25:24+00:00): Whoops, I probably should've taken a look at Streetside before changing this to Jacksons - in the area I'm at all Shell convenience stores are Jacksons. After looking at the Streetside imagery, I've changed this to a Shell convenience store
archpdx (2021-11-08 03:26:02+00:00): Thanks for catching this!
pika_sky (2021-11-08 13:24:38+00:00): taketaketakeさん，こんにちは。
今回taketaketakeさんが行った名称の修正ですが，この道路には事業名として「港川道路」と名付けられているのでその名前を戻していただけないでしょうか？もしも単なる「浦添西原線」が良いということでしたら，その理由をお聞かせいただければと思います。どうぞよろしくお願いします。
（なお，１週間以内にお返事が無ければ路線名をもとにお戻しする所存です）
ravali_78 (2021-11-09 07:40:37+00:00): HI Zayne Chin,
I have Fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with highways.Kindly check with node 9234227646, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113552538.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113501475
mariotomo (2021-11-08 14:19:43+00:00): Alvarado2510, te invito a revisar este conjunto de cambios: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113428508

es una derivación, resuelta con turn:lanes.  resuelve el cruce sin vías ficticias.y con menos restricciones de giro.
NiLaKol (2021-12-27 05:57:21+00:00): Hallo, 
mit diesem und vielen anderen CS entfernst du die Tags leisure=garden und landcover=grass. 
Mit deinem CS-Kommentar "fixed" und der dort angegebenen Quelle "mapbox" kann ich diese Änderung nicht nachvollziehen. Kannst du bitte erläutern weshalb du diese Tags entfernt hast?
ravali_78 (2021-11-09 07:28:05+00:00): Hi Zayne Chin,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygons overlapping with highways.Kindly check with node 9234255319,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113551992.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113501787
Wilmer Osario (2021-11-09 00:26:14+00:00): ¡Gracias por contribuir! Estos datos son muy valiosos para nuestro mapa 😄
David Rook (2021-11-08 04:12:02+00:00): This area does not route properly in RideWithGPS.  Multiple attempts to solve problem have failed. It used to route OK a few years ago. Section between Cypress Cove Dam and Storys Station Road also has a "phantom" gravel road (on RWGPS) which appears for no reason roughly 400 ft to the west of this modified section. Something weird is going on here.  Could be RWGPS software but I use it A LOT and have never had a routing problem where I couldn't fix the issue in OSM before.
David Rook (2021-11-08 04:14:58+00:00): To recreate problem in RWGPS I try to route from the dam to Story's Station Road.  Instead of direct route (west) it goes east to Scottswood then Bethel Road and down to Story's Station and Country Club intersection.  Usually this behavior (which I fix frequently) is a disconnect for an  immediately obvious reason. Not the case here - at least for me.
ravali_78 (2021-11-09 06:25:17+00:00): Hi yonaputri
I have removed overlapping highways.Kindly check with w1000411465,w1000411466, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113549621.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113502945
ovruni (2021-11-08 04:50:09+00:00): Hola Toni2909, varios de sus conjuntos de cambios contienen textos como "niveles", sin embargo esto no brinda suficiente información sobre los cambios realizados, por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
danbjoseph (2021-11-30 13:45:43+00:00): These are agricultural fields, not buildings. Please be careful when you are mapping.
maraf24 (2022-11-23 10:33:40+00:00): You didn't check if river is actually a river. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794273139/history
Mashin (2022-11-23 11:18:12+00:00): Oh boy, you're right!
Fixed that here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129277340

Though it seems that waterpark needs some love. Some of the slides are even tagged as water drains. I think more appropriate would be something like:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dwater_slide
SK53 (2021-11-15 10:38:27+00:00): Should the Central Catholic High School also be excluded from the CMU polygon? Latter looks a bit unrefined (e.g. excludes TCS Hall & includes parts of properties on W side of S Neville St.

Looks like this area is getting a bit of attention recently, well done!
JAAS (2022-07-13 17:04:41+00:00): These (https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=21/14.85004/-91.51638) `points` make no sense. What were you trying to map, the trees? I can gladly help you do this properly...

Estos https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=21/14.85004/-91.51638 "puntos" no hacen sentido alguno. Qué intentaba agregar, los árboles? Con gusto puedo apoyarle a hacerlo correctamente...

Regards, 
Jorge / JAAS
ovruni (2021-11-08 05:48:04+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto se indica "NIVELES", sin embargo también ha consistido en eliminar etiquetas existentes de otros objetos, por lo que he revertido estos cambios.
Saludos
CjMalone (2021-11-09 00:02:15+00:00): Cleaned up in #113543554.

Address nodes shouldn't be on the way.
Ser9ei (2021-11-08 10:52:08+00:00): Тэги source=bing, source:position=bing (0,0) и им подобные устарели. Не надо вешать их на каждую линию. Тем более эта информация дублируется в соответствующем поле к пакету правок:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:source
danbjoseph (2021-11-30 14:02:47+00:00): there is no building here. just agricultural fields.
Cyber Alert Red (2021-11-08 20:04:33+00:00): "The island is no entire piece of rock" https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113489873
Andre68 (2021-11-08 23:03:42+00:00): May be, but a relation as coastline is more wrong. I did only fix that and took tagging out of history. If you have local knowledge, then you are free to fix it!
Heinz_V (2022-01-09 21:57:34+00:00): You made correction to NH727A: 
 each NH is part of a relation; you should update these relations.
VLD206 (2022-01-11 14:11:58+00:00): Hi Heinz_V, I added the relations back and the ref-tag as well
ibanez (2021-11-08 15:09:58+00:00): Bitte lies die Wikiseite wie Telefonnummern korrekt eingetragen werden. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone?uselang=de
ChehrehBargi (2022-01-09 12:20:47+00:00): سلام ضمن خسته نباشید، قسمتی از راه اردبیل خلخال که توسط بنده اصلاح شده بود به وضعیت قبل بازگردانده‌اید. این مسیر جاده عریضی هست که تنها خط‌کشی وسط دارد... نه چراغی، نه خط‌کشی حاشیه جاده و خطوط وسط، نه گاردریل یا جداکننده دیگری.
این جاده شرایط دو لاین مجزا را ندارد، لطفا تا درست نشدن جاده، آن را به شکلی که در آینده نامعلوم احداث خواد شد، در نیاورید.
باسپاس
fereydoon555 (2022-01-15 11:12:06+00:00): ممنون از اطلاعتون
ChehrehBargi (2022-01-16 19:52:37+00:00): ارادت
مجددا از زحمات شما و دیگر دوستان تشکر و قدردانی دارم.
muchichka_s (2021-11-11 18:24:03+00:00): Для чого Ви змінюєте класифікацію доріг і розриваєте trunk-мережу?
selb (2021-11-12 04:33:54+00:00): Тому, що це не є шосе. Ні реально, ні за визначенням OSM. Усі звʼязки зберігаються.
selb (2021-11-12 04:47:27+00:00): Вибачте, Ви праві. Опис міток в редакторі не відповідає опису в Вікі.
afgb1977 (2024-12-04 00:27:36+00:00): Hola, veo toda la costa colombiana del Mar Caribe con sus ediciones de wikipedia en idioma inglés.
Estoy revertiendo y/o corrigiendo al idioma español ya que estás ediciones no están acordes con las reglas de mapeo para key=value wikipedia.
Todos los pueblos y municipios tocados por usted tienen su correspondiente entrada en idioma español en wikipedia, el idioma español es  el idioma oficial de Colombia y se habla en toda la extensión del país.
Cual es el objetivo de este tipo de mapeo?
La forma correcta de mapear wikipedia en Colombia es=
wikipedia=es:xxx
Solo si no existe la entrada correspondiente en wikipedia español del elemento se permite el uso de wikipedia=en:xxx
En la comunidad colombiana OSM estaremos agradecidos que te apegues a las reglas de mapeo y que en futuras ocasiones consultes primero con la comunidad antes de llevar a cabo estos cambios masivos en el territorio colombiano.
aweech (2021-11-08 14:58:30+00:00): Hi!
To answer your question and explain why this road was on the map, OSM in the United States had a huge import of Census data back in the late 00s. The data was of varying quality, and it was especially bad in rural areas like here. This way was brought in in that import (called the TIGER import). We're still working to clean everything up from it, so please feel free to delete or change anything that seems untrue, or you can flag it like you did here. 

Thank you for your contributions!

Sincerely,
aweech
Xvtn (2021-11-08 19:32:35+00:00): Got it, thanks for the explanation!
user_5359 (2021-11-09 18:07:54+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321571777/history. Why did you delete the tag leisure=park?
dmsellers (2021-11-10 12:51:09+00:00): I would have no reason to change it.  I must have made a mistake.
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-06-04 16:26:54+00:00): Добрый вечер.

В пакете правок 119383515 данный way - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000445194/history - был удалён и вместо него был создан сомнительный relation - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14009929/history Посмотрите пожалуйста.
fims7 (2022-06-06 06:19:44+00:00): Добрый день, я плохо понимаю зачем VovanWing удалил стилобат здания
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-06-06 20:04:12+00:00): Я почти уверен, что он не понял, что удалил стилобат, поэтому и написал вам с просьбой посмотреть и поправить 🔧. Самому юзеру VovanWing писать не стал (он не выглядит коммуникабельным).
vsahith (2021-11-08 08:11:24+00:00): Edited access tag as per Driver feedback.
Warin61 (2021-11-19 05:49:44+00:00): Yes the buildings should have been referenced to the roads locations. Now many roads are crossing buildings - mess!
bdhurkett (2021-11-19 06:24:09+00:00): That's true, especially as more of the roads have been adjusted since this changeset. Maxar imagery is better for the buildings as it's newer, but Bing imagery was better for aligning roads as it was more consistent over long distances, so I didn't want to attempt both at the same time. I will clean up the rest of my mess very soon.
Warin61 (2021-11-19 08:02:30+00:00): I have done a few where they cross a 'road' (alley).

Good luck .. it won't be 'nice'. Possibly select all buildings with you as author (should be able to do that .. but I don't recall the magic potion) and move them as one lot. Then check them at various places.
user_13980615 (2021-11-10 13:57:48+00:00): hi Swax000! This changeset modified the pond border to not flow onto the west track road. Do you check this spot by yourself? Because I biked on the west tarck road three times this year before sept and every time my wheels were stuck in the mud under water.
---
Translated by Google:
привет Swax000! Этот набор изменений изменил границу пруда, чтобы не переходить на западную дорогу. Вы проверяете это место самостоятельно? Потому что в этом году до сентября я трижды ехал на велосипеде по западной асфальтовой дороге, и каждый раз мои колеса застревали в грязи под водой.
Swax000 (2021-11-16 16:38:55+00:00): Hello. I apologize for the incorrect changeset fix.  In the process of learning, we considered it a dredged node, we wanted to improve the map. Please draw the deleted fragment again. Thanks
user_13980615 (2021-11-17 10:36:00+00:00): Thank for your reply and Mapbox Data Team's effort. Hope you can check other mapper's changeset description before making fix.
Mannivu (2021-11-08 16:15:17+00:00): Ciao. In Italia i numeri civici vanno aggiunti su un nodo vicino a dove si trova la targhetta del civico, non sull'edificio che si trova a quel civico.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113510361
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
dcapillae (2021-11-08 10:52:45+00:00): Buenas tardes, Marketing Safamotor.

¿Es correcto este cambio? El número 42 de la avenida está algo más arriba. Esta altura de la calle corresponde con el número 32. ¿Podría justificar este cambio? A veces la dirección postal de un establecimiento no coincide con la dirección física del local donde tiene alguna de sus sedes. ¿Es este el caso?

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel
Marketing Safamotor (2021-11-08 11:08:15+00:00): Hola, desde el viernes pasado el negocio cambió de ubicación, aunque mantenemos de momento las el número 32 y el número 42 para usos diferentes, de forma que el definitivo es el 42, manteniendo el 32 también para otros fines.

Gracias,

Atentamente,

Atonio
dcapillae (2021-11-08 13:04:10+00:00): Genial. Muchas gracias por la aclaración. Para cualquier duda, no dude en contactarme.

Gracias de nuevo por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel
dcapillae (2021-11-08 10:46:37+00:00): Buenas tardes, Marketing Safamotor.

El nombre principal del establecimiento debe aparecer en la etiqueta «name». Si el PDI tiene además algún otro nombre alternativo por el que también es conocido, puede añadirse en la etiqueta «alt_name» o «loc_name». El establecimiento se puede buscar en el mapa por cualquier de estos nombres y aparecerá en los resultados de búsqueda indistintamente. Hay más detalles en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres

Ya está corregido. Gracias por la colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel
Marketing Safamotor (2021-11-08 11:09:16+00:00): Gracias Daniel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
nevw (2021-11-12 13:01:42+00:00): Hi
I think the hostpital is an example of an invalid multipolygon.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.76246&lat=-27.6187&zoom=15
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Another way to map it would be to draw a way around the whole outside and then add two of the section as building parts.
jd800 (2021-11-12 16:02:57+00:00): Should be fixed by Changeset 113702615
ToniE (2021-11-08 09:22:28+00:00): Servus,

nach den vielen Korrekturen deiner- und meinerseits (Busse 5xx) werde ich die Analyse per PTNA nachher nochmals starten.

Gruß,
Toni
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
4004 (2022-05-13 14:29:36+00:00): а на вот этих лепестках клевера https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958588384 точно 60? на этапе строительства было 40, да и на нижних лепестках ближе к Неману тоже 40
Prusaker (2022-05-13 14:42:43+00:00): На тот момент, когда я тегировал на этих участках скорость, я не видел никаких ограничивающих знаков (я тегировал по видео с регистратора автомобиля). Возможно скорость позже ограничили, либо я всё же что-то проглядел.
4004 (2022-05-13 14:53:43+00:00): вот тут в июне было 40 https://youtu.be/OzHGO27yHgE?t=99, но вы ехали видимо позже, так что может убрали
bxl-forever (2021-11-08 13:53:00+00:00): Hello,
Having type=multipolygon on a way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38790701/history) is incorrect.
What did you attempt to "fix" here?
JhowieNitnek (2021-11-08 13:57:46+00:00): It was a multipolygon with kattenberg as something that isn't part of the park  but it is a part of the park
bxl-forever (2021-11-08 15:03:04+00:00): OK, I suppose you just clicked a button and didn’t check the tags.
I cleaned it up.
Have a nice day.
Filip009 (2023-01-23 09:58:30+00:00): Je to vojenská strelnica https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000457908 alebo obyčajná strelnica? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=shooting
menganito (2023-02-15 08:31:23+00:00): Opravené, Ďakujem
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132570244
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
5m4u9 (2021-11-08 20:25:06+00:00): eso de poner marked, es muy genérico, la idea es especificar para conocer estado.
5m4u9 (2021-11-08 20:25:33+00:00): me refiero a los cruces
JJIglesias (2021-11-09 06:45:14+00:00): Son marcados, osea zebras, areas o entre dos rayas, dependiendo lo q se le antoje a la Alcaldia q parece no tener ningun estandar. Creo q eso es una "tarea" de StreetComplete
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-08 15:01:00+00:00): Hi xdlu, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Supaplex030 (2021-11-08 14:50:02+00:00): Wäre ein "check_date" am Spielplatz dafür nicht ausreichend? Ich habe angefangen, "check_date" an "neu" gemappten Spielplätzen zu taggen (also an der Fläche) und würde eher einen Spielplatz systematisch auf Umgestaltung und evtl. kaputte Geräte prüfen als einzelne Spielgeräte...

Aber gut - ergänz' es doch noch an der Gesamtfläche, dann sind wir beide zufrieden :)

P.S. Hab auch vereinzelt angefangen, repräsentative Fotos von Spielplätzen zu ergänzen - falls du mal bei Sonnenschein auf einem leeren Spielplatz stehtst :)
tordans (2021-11-08 18:55:30+00:00): Check date: Ich wollte genau das mal ausprobieren. IMO muss es pro Spielgerät sein, denn ich kann nicht immer einen ganzen Spielplatz überblicken bzw mir merken. Und eine App wie SC würde auch einzelne Geräte abfrage. Sehe auch keinen Nachteil.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113513365
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-08 10:01:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113514549 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI edits of unknown provenance where the editor has refused contact with the US community. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5422 .
Patchanka (2021-11-08 12:18:07+00:00): bonjour
pouvez-vous prêter attention à la manière dont vous nommez les éléments ? Ici vous avez indiqué "rond_point de l'Hélice" : il faudrait des majuscules et un tiret (- au lieu de _) : Rond-Point de l'Hélice" serait plus approprié.
Merci pour vos contributions