piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-04-08 14:22:07+00:00): Dag OmeAnne...  operator kan prima, maar name=Speeltuin kan er beter af.
De functie niet toevoegen als naam. 
Het was al een edit van een vorige mapper.
Van de zelfde orde even als voorbeeld  name=bankje name=lantaarnpaal e.d. Dat hoort niet in een kaart. 
MVG
eggie
4004 (2021-04-11 23:21:20+00:00): hw=living street не ставим?
Prusaker (2021-04-12 05:32:22+00:00): Вроде же обсуждали, что ставим только если это улица с именем. Для дворовых проездов вполне достаточно hw=service + living_street=yes.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-17 14:38:10+00:00): Just for info, there was a node-drag introduced by Micron here too; I've fixed that.  See http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=97005948 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-08 14:33:10+00:00): Hi agheimark, welcome to OSM.

same again, if a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

Could you revert your deletions? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
agheimark (2021-04-08 14:46:11+00:00): I'd prefer if they were removed to not cause confusion.  We use OpenStreetMap for our county web mapping application and it shows the driveways going through private properties and some residents have complained. Thanks for your input!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-03 10:39:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113325200 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI edits of unknown provenance where the editor has refused contact with the US community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5420 ..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-08 14:32:22+00:00): Hi agheimark, welcome to OSM.

If a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

Could you revert your deletions? Thanks.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=102566107#14/40.3724/-75.2304

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
eggie (2021-04-08 14:25:41+00:00): Ahh... dan zou 30km wel kunnen. Staat er wel een bord fietspad?  Zoniet dan is het gewoon een highway=unclassified..
De paaltjes houden de auto's tegen in de routering.
motor_vehicle=no hoeft niet op een paaltje. Dat is default. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-08 14:34:07+00:00): Het noordelijke paaltje heb ik vastgemaakt aan de weg.. Het heeft anders geen functie.
stighittaren (2021-04-13 17:28:18+00:00): Hej! Finns det någon policy att alltid följa SMHI eller Länsstyrelsens namngivning av sjöar? Det ska väl vara ”verifierbart” men inga skyltar finns i skogen :)
På äldre kartor heter den Ulvatjärn och jag har aldrig hört nån säga Ulvatjärnen. Är ju inget större problem i det här fallet men bara en fundering.
stighittaren (2021-04-13 17:40:18+00:00): Våtmarken under kraftledningen i Gräskärr har jag själv klampat igenom på numera sjunkna spångar, förhoppningen är att nästa person skulle kunna se på kartan att där är våtmark och inte försöka följa ledningsgatan :)
archie (2021-04-13 19:12:52+00:00): Det verkar vara en gåta varför Lantmäteriets namngivning är avvikande. Ett lösningsförslag: skriv name=Ulvatjärn och för de som har vant sig vid/följer Lantmäteriets namnskick official_name=Ulvatjärnen. Så kommer samma sjö upp vid namnsökning på resp namnform och alla är glada.
Cristoffs (2021-04-08 20:25:00+00:00): Cześć! Proszę sprawdź jak należy opisywać obiekty na wiki. Budynek stacji benzynowej powinien być inaczej oznaczony. Przy rysowaniu budynków korzystaj ze skrótu "Q" - katy będą proste.
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-08 14:30:24+00:00): Hi Amrutha_Singh, welcome to OSM.

I think your changeset comment is misleading here. May we know the reason behind your deletions? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
marc__marc (2024-07-17 15:13:32+00:00): Bonjour,
veux-tu bien vérifier le fait que tu as mis la station total dans la Rue Florent Evrard alors que le no 75 se trouve beaucoup plus au nord-est
Cordialement,
Marc
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
nmsl🤣 (2021-05-14 14:45:44+00:00): 你好，S377省道（中宿路）是省级道路，个人认为道路应设成为highway:primary
eggie (2021-04-08 14:37:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
feedback.. In OSM geen spatie zetten in een postcode. 
Voor openingstijden kun je deze 'tool' gebruiken. Dan krijg je het juiste format.
openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 



MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
id_p (2021-04-12 13:00:32+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Bedankt voor het advies.  Ik zie dat ik een fout had gemaakt met de notatie van de openingstijden, die heb ik nu gecorrigeerd.

Met vriendelijke groet,

P
eggie (2021-04-12 13:13:04+00:00): Top!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Nomadmapper (2021-04-09 08:09:31+00:00): Bonjour, Le parking de 20 places correspond-il au parking en "bataille" le long de la rue Pouy ou celui plus à l'Est arboré ? La localisation du point peut porter à confusion je pense. Ajoutez idéalement le type de parking (surface=*). Merci!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102568099
Nomadmapper (2021-04-09 08:15:36+00:00): Erratum : Le tag pour type de parking est parking=*   ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102568099
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Palolo (2021-04-08 14:46:16+00:00): Congratulations on your first edit in OSM, we appreciate the help. Please look over the instructions to see how to accurately trace buildings.
Thanks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 22:12:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105112817 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
praeteritum (2022-07-30 17:31:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124276351.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
ivanbranco (2022-10-01 12:45:13+00:00): Hi brianboru,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8606798649

I suppose the memorial=* tag was meant to be inscription=* but I just want to be sure. Can you confirm it?
brianboru (2022-10-02 13:54:48+00:00): It's so long ago since I surveyed this all I can say I probably copied what was written on the accompanying plaque and at that inscription wasn't even a tag then. If you think it needs improving please go ahead
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
rthik007 (2021-04-14 06:10:54+00:00): Hi hsiaosuyi,
Changed the classification based on the surrounding area and quality of the road. and also deleted unnecessary crossing tags to the nodes
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102903088
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102568874
Note_Fixer (2021-04-08 13:45:28+00:00): Note 2549580 (Closed)
Note 2550526 (Closed)
Note_Fixer (2021-04-08 14:05:08+00:00): https://www.journal-topics.com/articles/demolition-of-2-elk-grove-hotels-clears-way-for-new-development/
◪ Jarv (2021-04-08 15:16:59+00:00): Does this turn ban also apply to bicycles?
bathines (2021-04-09 11:47:32+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the turn restriction based on the mapillary street level imagery. I have not modified the bicycle access as there is no valid evidence to add the restriction. It can be helpful if your local knowledge can improvise our edit quality. Please let me know if anything else needs to be modified. Always happy to learn from the community.
ash_win (2021-04-14 11:02:21+00:00): Hi svlau,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 805499190,way 804373898
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102924843
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102569257
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 12:21:52+00:00): Hi, du hast hier Garagen mit landuse=garages versehen, was man eher bei größeren Geländen mit mehreren Garagen-Gebäuden taggen würde. Hier reicht einfach building=garage(s) auf den einzelnen Gebäuden.
Habs mal entsprechend angepasst.

Grüße
Hauke
Duconi (2021-04-17 16:38:00+00:00): Sehr gut. Danke =)
adrianojbr (2021-04-08 13:45:52+00:00): Nota: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2557809
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-03 10:39:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113325200 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI edits of unknown provenance where the editor has refused contact with the US community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5420 ..
ash_win (2021-04-14 10:46:27+00:00): Hi hsiaosuyi,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential road.Kindly check way 428165986
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102923808
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102570127
Note_Fixer (2021-04-08 13:59:20+00:00): Note 2549582 (Closed)
Note 2549581 (Closed)
Note 2550528 (Closed)
Note_Fixer (2021-04-08 14:02:56+00:00): https://www.journal-topics.com/articles/demolition-of-2-elk-grove-hotels-clears-way-for-new-development/
ڕاستی (2022-10-24 20:47:29+00:00): Hello chenstella.
Please be aware how to build buildings. None of these buildings you mapped are good mapped, none of them. I will delete them because it's even not closed. Regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102570284
ڕاستی (2022-10-24 20:48:50+00:00): And look at the Imagery checked it up again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102570284
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-08 14:28:10+00:00): Hi Amrutha_Singh, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several tracks, which have been mapped just 8h before by a different contributor? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 12:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103570502, 103571860 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
praeteritum (2022-07-29 05:52:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124211798.
ma-rt-in (2021-04-08 14:30:13+00:00): Hallo,
bitte die Gebäude nicht einfach löschen, sondern mit dem life cylce prefix versehen.

vg
Duconi (2021-04-08 18:27:53+00:00): Hey ma-rt-in,
warum soll ich die nicht löschen? Die Gebäude gibt es dort ja nicht mehr. Warum sollte auf der Karte etwas auftauchen, was es nicht gibt? Auf der Wiki-Seite zu life cycle steht auch: "Historic objects with no relevance to current state of an object generally do not belong in OpenStreetMap" Und das ist hier ja der Fall. Die Gebäude haben in der OSM nichts mehr zu suchen. Es gibt sie schlicht nicht mehr. Sie sind höchstens von historischem Interesse, aber OSM ist keine historische Karte.
VG
Duconi
ma-rt-in (2021-04-19 17:14:30+00:00): Hallo,
also zum einen "taucht" in der Karte nix mehr auf, zum anderen ist ist ein Hinweis für die Mapper die nur nach Luftbildern mappen, das die Gebäude weg sind. Zu dem bleiben dann noch Adressen und ähnliches erhalten.
vg
Duconi (2021-04-20 22:22:45+00:00): Hallo, naja, die Baustelle taucht auf und ist ein Hinweis für Mapper, die nur nach Luftbildern mappen. Die Adressen ändern sich möglicherweise. Also so richtig nachvollziehen kann ich es nicht, aber ich werde das nächste mal dran denken.
vg
osmviborg (2021-04-08 14:34:39+00:00): Hej. Vær venlig ikke at tilføje adresseoplysninger på områder & bygninger. Det bruges ikke i DK.
Erik_Bachmann (2021-04-08 14:58:46+00:00): Tak for info. Men det er et privat område, der tilhører grundejerforeningen. Derfor at jeg tilføjet ansvarlig. Men fjerne adressen igen
Palolo (2021-04-09 16:10:34+00:00): Please take the time to accurately map building outlines. Rushing to finish a tile is not helpful. Thank you
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 22:12:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105112817 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 12:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103570502, 103571860 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-09 07:34:40+00:00): Bonjour, Peut l'ajout d'une petite description pour savoir à quoi s'attendre ? 
#CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102572206
user_390227 (2021-04-09 19:40:13+00:00): bicycle=yes
foot=yes
rkkapilk (2021-04-12 08:45:25+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. It is good to see the community improvising our edit quality with the local knowledge. Always happy to learn from the community.
Puxan (2021-04-08 14:54:36+00:00): (Automatic translation) 
Hi, I’m reviewing project 9024. I see you have mapped a lot of buildings. Good job. 
The intention is to map the base of the buildings, we assume that isolated buildings usually have a rectangular base. The image we see is usually distorted by perspective and the presence of a gabled roof and by the eaves or trees that cover an angle. We avoid this deformation and draw the rectangle that we assume as the base. Don’t forget to squad the buildings that can be squatted. The sequence with the buildings is: draw, square and label.                 
Please,  watch these videos:  https://learnosm.org                      
Keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102572733
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-09 07:23:26+00:00): Défibrilateur en intérieur ? en extérieur ? 
#CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102572908
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 22:12:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105112817 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
todeveni (2021-08-20 14:53:42+00:00): Bensowinkuja has a strange sharp bend after this changeset. Possibly accidental dragging of a point?
praeteritum (2022-07-29 05:22:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124211086.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 22:12:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105112817 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
rthik007 (2021-04-14 05:51:54+00:00): Hi chichungchao,
Building polygons overlapping with residential WAY: 927754187.
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102902216
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102573638
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-09 07:13:24+00:00): Bonjour, 
Pourriez vous compléter l'information concernant ce point d'eau ? (accès, gratuité, possibilité de remplir une bouteille, opérateur) 
Merci
#CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102573686
Nathan OT Terres de Chalosse (2021-04-09 14:45:22+00:00): Modifications faites
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-09 07:10:38+00:00): La donnée pourrait être plus complète ? Pourriez-vous indiquer si l'on peut prendre de l'eau, si l'accès est autorisé et gratuit, s'il est possible de remplir une bouteille ? 
Merci
#CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102573753
Enock4seth (2023-05-16 10:35:57+00:00): mapping every tiny path as a residential road is completely useless and doesn't help anyone as in this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927761246/history 
and others you have mapped here. 

Kindly avoid this type of mapping
Rogoyski (2021-05-08 07:52:35+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że to, że lokalsi chodzą gdzieś wyprowadzać pieski, nie czyni jeszcze tego miejsca recreation_ground.
syntex (2021-05-08 08:53:12+00:00): Proponujesz w zamian po prostu grassland?
Rogoyski (2021-05-08 15:16:19+00:00): recreation_ground rezerwowałbym dla czegoś, co dla czegoś, co jest w jakiś sposób wyznaczone do rekreacji albo posiada jakąś insrastrukturę. Więc tak, grassland albo shrub, cokolwiek bardziej odpowiednie. Dzięki.
syntex (2021-05-08 17:56:12+00:00): Ok, zmieniłem
praeteritum (2022-07-28 05:32:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124166214.
StefanHRT (2021-04-08 15:39:49+00:00): Danke ;)
ash_win (2021-04-14 10:04:02+00:00): Hi oringril,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 427765999
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102919808
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102574434
praeteritum (2022-07-28 05:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124165773.
user_5359 (2021-04-09 14:30:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

If you need help, You are welcome
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 11:03:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103132090 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
praeteritum (2022-07-27 05:51:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124121527.
praeteritum (2022-07-27 05:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124121521.
praeteritum (2022-07-27 05:48:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124121513.
eggie (2021-04-08 16:06:10+00:00): reverted by changeset #102577444
blackboxlogic (2021-04-09 01:25:19+00:00): I get very curious when I see what people choose to map. Do you work for the city?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102576108
eggie (2021-04-08 15:55:00+00:00): Oke.. Even niet mappen hier..  
Trunkroad is al per default no voor fietsers
access=yes
motor_vehicle=yes klopt ook niet..en 
 geeft ook wel eens problemen. Dus dat gaat ook zo weg.
Wacht heel even op een reactie van A67... 
Dan revert ik de laatste vier changesets 
Hakunamatata
eggie (2021-04-08 16:05:44+00:00): reverted on request by changeset #102577444
gscholz (2021-04-10 08:50:46+00:00): Hi rodolfovargas,
your recent changesets have added a big amount of errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-68.71091&lat=-16.05363&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2021-04-10 08:50:49+00:00): Hi rodolfovargas,
your recent changesets have added a big amount of errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-68.71091&lat=-16.05363&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2021-04-13 04:37:16+00:00): Hi rodolfovargas, 
I can see some progess now but there are several errors left:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-68.70958&lat=-16.05171&zoom=16&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

As you are using JOSM how can it happen that you ignore the error warning during upload? These kind of errors are easy to detect with thw help of JOSM validator.
Guido