piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JeroenvanderGun (2022-12-29 23:46:25+00:00): Please don't make changes like this. The name-tag of a boundary relation is intended for the name of the area, not for the name of the corresponding country. I've reverted a lot of your changes.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

If you want to add Spanish names, provide the proper translation for the name that is already there, instead of overwriting all existing names.

If you want to link EEZ's to their corresponding countries, use country codes (e.g. like country_code=SE is tagged here) instead of copying country names.
AngocA (2022-12-30 15:49:51+00:00): Hi,

So, these areas should be names like:

"name:es": "Zona Económica Exclusiva de Portugal"

In this case:

"name:es": "Zona Económica Exclusiva de Suecia"
JeroenvanderGun (2022-12-30 16:20:14+00:00): That would vary from country to country. In case of Sweden the best translation is likely "Zona económica de Suecia" (without "exclusiva") - just look at the existing name or name:en and translate that to Spanish as accurately as possible.
AngocA (2022-12-30 18:09:01+00:00): OK, so each country defines its own name. But, the example you gave me shouldn't be on "official_name" tag?
Or can we put a common name on "alt_name" for all countries?
JeroenvanderGun (2022-12-30 18:50:29+00:00): I figure you want to have the name of the country/territory corresponding to the maritime zone? In that case, if the current country_code=* is not enough information, we could prefix the country/territory info with a "territory:" prefix.

For example:

boundary=maritime
border_type=eez
territory:name=Sweden
name=Sweden's Economic Zone

Then a data consumer/renderer can choose between name (name of the zone), territory:name (name of the corresponding country/territory) or something composite like territory:name+border_type (like you originally entered).
archie (2022-11-10 13:08:41+00:00): Hej, jag reverterade den här cs. Du försköt läget av servicevägen till fel läge. Den var helt rätt placerad innan du flyttade den. Det märkliga är att vi alla tre (den ursprunglige mappern, du och även jag har använt samma bildbakgrund). Det verkar som om du bör justera din bildbakgrund. Det är ett vanligt nybörjarfel, så ledsna inte för det. Så här går du till väga: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery. :-)
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
emersonveenstra (2022-11-14 13:45:42+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128892186 for sloppy work and dubious changes, including:
1 Multiple abbreviations of names in destination tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17757971 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17753186 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17754289
2. Writing a name on a road with noname=yes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17788482
3. Blantant typos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17758701
4. Mass edits of ref and destination:ref to be all caps and abbreviated, which is not a commonly accepted standard.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
TheBestIdea (2023-03-22 02:57:26+00:00): Hey Mxx,

FYI way 1111947492 was removed as part of the Beach 108th St bike path capital project which wrapped up late last year. I'm going to delete it.

Brandon
MxxCon (2023-03-22 03:02:13+00:00): sure. if you have more up-to-date info, go for it.👍
sdicke (2022-11-10 10:53:55+00:00): source=survey
grhardy3 (2022-11-10 06:39:21+00:00): Correction, it was trails near Powell River
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Diacritic (2022-11-22 05:42:54+00:00): Hello,

This organisation does not accept bitcoin.

You've indicated that this data was obtained by survey, however this looks like data taken from Google. I have reverted this edit.
BSN21M (2022-11-22 10:21:00+00:00): Hello, this company has registered with us btcmap.org.
cartofy (2022-11-28 04:21:22+00:00): Hello! Again, almost every single added point already has a POI present there. You have also marked several points as "Hospital". Why is that? If you know a hospital exists at that location, why have you not added the name? If you do not know the name, why state the name as "Hospital"?
voltairovicz (2022-11-10 13:34:10+00:00): Witaj,
Chciałbym cię powiadomić, iż numery dróg powiatowych nie dodajemy pod tagiem name=X, lecz pod ref, bądź w tym wypadku unsigned_ref=, jeżeli nr drogi powiatowej nie występuje na znaku w terenie. Czy zatem mógłbyś zedytować i przenieść numery, które dodałeś do odpowiedniego tagu? Dziękuję i w razie pomocy zapraszam na discorda OSM Polska https://discord.com/channels/783754873861963786/818912544033996801
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-14 14:50:51+00:00): usuwam name=DP1662W - jak już to do unsigned_ref lub ref jak są wyraźne znaki

to na pewno nie jest nazwa drogi
NorthCrab (2022-11-14 15:55:27+00:00): @Mateusz tylko teraz będą konflikty jak damy revert bo zobacz historie tego usera. Tam jest o wiele więcej do wywalenia :(.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-14 16:10:23+00:00): no, na tej lini konflikt będzie ale to nie zaszkodzi to by nie wymaga ona edycji

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149324919/history

a tej edycji innych zmian nie ma więc to też nie stanowi problemu
NorthCrab (2022-11-14 16:28:08+00:00): Okej!
cartofy (2022-11-25 09:21:28+00:00): I've noticed that you've added POIs right next to existing POIs. Why is that? If there was additional information that could have been added to the POIs, why was that not done instead?

Please go through https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
emersonveenstra (2022-11-11 00:53:11+00:00): Hi,

There are several typos in this changeset, please fix them and please double check your work before uploading. Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-11-14 18:44:11+00:00): Actually I'm gong to revert this one. Several typos in it, and no real information was added
emersonveenstra (2022-11-14 18:44:51+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128905153
cartofy (2022-12-20 06:16:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why have you moved a bus stop to an incorrect location, and added points with random numbers?
cartofy (2022-11-25 09:21:43+00:00): I've noticed that you've added POIs right next to existing POIs. Why is that? If there was additional information that could have been added to the POIs, why was that not done instead?

Please go through https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
cartofy (2022-12-05 04:52:17+00:00): Why have you added all names in CAPS? Most of these already exist in the database - why have they been duplicated?
Devdatta (2022-12-02 09:00:11+00:00): Why have you marked the Departments as places of Worship?
cartofy (2023-02-14 09:36:55+00:00): Why does your changeset comment say 'Done'? What have you done exactly? I see quite a few duplicate places of worship added - why have you done this?
cartofy (2022-12-17 15:00:05+00:00): Hi there! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you've made edits in the map, and that's great but all of your edits do not add value to the map, do not follow tagging conventions or are downright fictional. I'm reverting your changes, but please go through guidelines on https://learnosm.org/en/ before you make changes in the future. Also, kindly approach the OSM community if you have questions.
cartofy (2022-11-25 06:22:32+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM. I see that you've been adding a lot of data, which is good. However, almost all of the edits are of bad quality, such as buildings added on top of existing buildings, spelling mistakes in names, roads being moved around, and buildings being of random shapes, not squared off or going over roads. You don't see this in real life, do you? 

Please go through the OSM beginners guide: https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/

If you have questions on how you should make edits, please approach the community: https://community.osm.be/resources/asia/india/

Remember that this is a shared space and the map is used by everyone in that area, and also for use cases such as navigation. It is therefore critical that the changes we make to the map are in good faith and helpful. I've reverted many of the changes you made which had damaged the existing map, but I suggest you go through them and ask yourself - is this making the map better?
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-06 04:37:59+00:00): Hello, Amar_QT!
Your edit looks awesome, but I need to know about idnode:10173062257, looks like it's not highway=tertiary but like a canal based on Maxar Imagery. Can you look further about it? If you have any other suggestion, please let me know. Thank you :)'

https://maproulette.org/challenge/30186/task/142912275
Amar_QT (2022-12-07 04:34:09+00:00): Thank you Anisa IRM-ED,

The classification of this way [way 496803596] can be tagged as "unclassified" as it seems to be a canal way leading to multiple destinations by extending the way 496803596 till node 4884714791, I didn't change because other surrounding roads have been wrongly marked "tertiary" by other mapper along with this highway. I suggest correcting that area to logically classify the highways, if you want me to do so. please confirm, and thank you again for your valuable input.

Regards.
Amar_QT
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-07 06:56:43+00:00): Hai Amar_QT, it would be appreciated if you can correct that highway, you're welcome and happy mapping
Amar_QT (2022-12-08 13:19:18+00:00): Hi Anisa IRM-ED,

I have corrected the classification of the highway. Thank you. 

Regards,
Amar_QT
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Allison P (2022-11-12 20:27:23+00:00): The section beyond the gate is not part of the public road, so the name should probably be removed.
chittram (2022-11-14 09:46:57+00:00): Hello Allison,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edits. We have made the necessary corrections in the changeset #128881071.Thanks once again for the feedback provided, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
chittram
eggie (2022-11-10 09:38:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
wireguy (2025-01-27 22:09:42+00:00): Hi smikhnouski.  Kensington Circle seems to be named Cout on philly public data, so I changed it.   Can you verify with your Lyft sources?   Thanks. here's the philly link: https://atlas.phila.gov/2142%20KENSINGTON%20CT/condos
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-01-28 16:01:37+00:00): Hi, Wireguy! 
My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft. 
The name was added four years ago in this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94740009. 
Indeed, the street name “Kensington Court” is visible on the Lyft-owned street-view image from February 2024: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SyjZYr0y0GJXSgd3UVxCWnm2KiiWDUxL/view?usp=drive_link. It appears that your solution is correct, especially since the philly public data confirms it. Thank you for your fix.

Best regards, Yuliya
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-11-10 12:41:11+00:00): Hello, I don't get it. The shop's name is House.
marczoutendijk (2022-11-10 15:05:24+00:00): I fixed it. It was a mistake because there are 1000's of name=House where building=house was meant.
Also there are many brand:House shops that are located in a building=retail + shop=clothes location where the building shouldn't cary a name because that is already in the brand.
marczoutendijk (2022-11-10 16:00:51+00:00): Anyway, I fixed all the brand=House tags to also include name=House!
Thanks for pointing me to this.
jeslop (2022-11-10 11:13:15+00:00): Hola aitorgullo

En las imáganes que dices utilizar (PNOA) no se ve ningún edificio en esa zona. ¿Es un error de mapeo?

Saludos

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
archie (2022-11-10 09:25:44+00:00): Varför raderar du helt rätt inlagd information om att denna väg är en gårdsuppfart (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343886593/history)? Informationen har lagts in av en mycket erfaren mappare. Varför raderar du sånt?
archie (2022-11-10 13:19:13+00:00): Hade varit trevligt med ett svar, men jag ser (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128731932) att du numera lägger in information om uppfartsväg. Riktigt bra! Stort tack!!
eggie (2022-11-10 09:46:30+00:00): Nu een bijdrage in Nederland, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen...  Bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Dende_PIF (2022-11-12 12:43:23+00:00): Thanks voor de welkomst mail en de aanwijzingen Eggie.
abakus_uploader (2022-11-10 23:32:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
archie (2022-11-10 09:16:05+00:00): Varför raderar du helt rätt inlagd information om att denna väg är en gårdsuppfart (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343886593)?
archie (2022-11-10 10:17:36+00:00): kommentar till fel cs.
pretzel_raccoon (2022-11-15 20:32:01+00:00): yes i think you got it about right, it's complicated over there
mpatsevich_lyft (2022-11-16 11:38:29+00:00): Hi, pretzel_raccoon.
My name is Marina, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Unfortunately, it's not entirely clear to me what kind of edits you mean. There is some pretty complex road geometry in this area, but I have added only two gates based on Bing Streetside view images in the changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/128723019/. Anyway, thank you for your comment. 
Best regards,
Marina
user_5359 (2022-11-11 07:42:17+00:00): Hello! Please use the key building instead of bulding. I have correct this typo.
ivanatora (2022-11-10 11:14:00+00:00): Моля, използвай правилни тагове. Улиците не са natural=tree_row
AurélienQ (2023-01-26 15:15:47+00:00): Bonjour, 
Je travaille actuellement sur la zone de la Gare de Nîmes - Pont-du-Gard et il se trouve que j'ai remarqué que vos zones d'herbe n'étaient précise qu'a plusieurs mètres près.  S'il vous plait essayez d'être précis car sinon cela oblige à refaire les zones et on perd beaucoup de temps.
Cordialement,
La Voie
cOSMografix (2023-01-26 19:45:25+00:00): C'est ça qui est bien dans les projets collaboratifs. Quand une contributeur est nul, les super trop forts peuvent corriger aux petits oignons.
Bon courage. Ça va bien se passer comme dirait l'autre. ;)
AurélienQ (2023-01-26 19:59:35+00:00): Je ne voulais pas dire que vous étiez nul, loin de là. Juste qu'il faudrait faire un peu plus attention (car entre corriger ou refaire c'est pas toute a fais la même chose). 
En tout cas je suis content que vous ne l'ayez pas mal pris (j'avais un peu peur).
C'est un conseil que je voulais donner comme j'en ai reçu un paquet lorsque je débutais.
Et puis vous avez totalement raison, c'est là tout l'intérêt d'un projet collaboratif.
Bonne fin de semaine !
cOSMografix (2023-01-26 21:00:30+00:00): Si si c’était nul :)
Quand une zone est trop mal fagotée et s'il n'y a pas de détails dessus, le mieux est de la reprendre de zero à mon avis. Sauf s'il y a un historique dessus. Rattraper point par point c'est sur que c'est long.
En tout cas bon travail sur la gare. Ça prend forme :)
Un de ces jours j'irai prendre des notes à l’intérieur si personne n'y passe bientôt.
Bonne carto.
n76 (2022-11-10 17:33:32+00:00): Isn't the 25 mph speed limit a conditional one (when children present or school in session)? I think some form of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:conditional would be appropriate rather than changing the maxspeed value.
hemroros (2022-11-14 12:01:38+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing your insightful recommendations. However based on the street view available (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=779848906292084&focus=photo&lat=33.47004913636398&lng=-117.59730664544998&z=17&x=0.7385023685767325&y=0.666779779249085&zoom=3) we are unable to add the maxspeed: conditional tag, since there is no time duration mentioned in the sign board available. It would be a great help if you can provide us the time duration in which the conditional restriction should be added, so that we can add it from our end.
Regards,
hemroros
eggie (2022-11-10 10:08:11+00:00): Beste Eco.. Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar er zal getagd moeten worden volgens de conventie van OSM.
Dus niet name=Ingang Ecovredegaard
service=Inrit.
Beter maar verwijderen. 


MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-10 10:11:42+00:00): name=Ingang Ecovredegaard omgezet naar description=...
eggie (2022-11-10 10:26:37+00:00): Mooi Project.. Website ziet er schitterend uit. 

Idee...  Kijk eens naar http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/ voor eigen layer in OSM 

Dan kun je een eigen kaart aanmaken op basis van OSM en alle zaken daarin kwijt. Ook ingang.


Dan kun je een link opnemen in de website.
Verder gewoon ook fysiek een bordje Ingang...  neerzetten in het veld.

MVG
eggie
VictorIE (2022-11-22 21:11:39+00:00): Hi,

Overlap 2 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111983692
SzymonH (2022-11-13 17:50:39+00:00): Moim zdaniem przebudowany odcinek Tysiąclecia powinien być jedną jezdnią, bo nie ma żadnej wyspy rozdzielającej
Kovoschiz (2023-01-13 02:56:58+00:00): Please don't draw separate lines when there is no physically raised separation. This is dysfunctional, and misleading.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-10 10:21:46+00:00): What is the source of this import data?

Is it import or is it manual tracing from imagery?
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2022-11-11 12:41:09+00:00): Thanks mateuz... it is imported from mapwithai plugin or Rapid.. (Those are machine generated roads)
KCYYXGOMH2 (2024-01-30 15:37:10+00:00): Good change
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 17:51:58+00:00): should https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10173258194/history be marked as mosaic artwork?

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:artwork_type%3Dmosaic
gurglypipe (2022-11-10 11:10:51+00:00): Hiya, welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

This changeset covers quite a large area (Bristol to Bamburgh), which is discouraged (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets). I’m guessing it’s probably accidental, but please watch out for that in future.

The changeset comment also isn’t very informative. Informative changeset comments are useful for others to see why certain changes have been made (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments).

For example, the changes near Bamburgh are fairly self-explanatory as they match satellite imagery. But the deletion of the Greta Thunberg mural in Bristol (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7388360914) is unclear. Did you delete it because it’s been painted over? Or was the deletion accidental?

Adding information like that to changeset comments can help others check that edits aren’t spam or vandalism.

Thanks, and happy editing :)
hughrt (2022-11-10 11:50:55+00:00): Hi @gurglypipe 

Thanks very much for the constructive comments! The mural has been painted over - I'll be sure to add more context in my future changeset comments :)
Kovoschiz (2022-11-11 04:40:11+00:00): Please don't delete the `building=hotel`. This is to be refactored into `building:part=hotel`.
user_17505468 (2022-11-14 02:46:41+00:00): railway?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2023-01-18 10:07:38+00:00): 您好，不知道您出于什么原因（或许只是觉得铁路在地图上更突出一些？）使用铁路来绘制了公园内的步行道路，而这显然会给读图和使用数据的人造成非常大的困扰。
您到目前为止的4个changeset我已全部审阅完毕。我已在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131415266 中尽力修正。
chris66 (2023-08-20 12:57:32+00:00): Betrifft Knoten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/392264694 :

access Tags bitte an die betreffende Straße heften, nicht an einen Node. 

Grüße
Mashin (2022-11-10 10:57:01+00:00): Hi and thanks for contributing!

Just a few suggestions on this set of changes. When you add a building, you can press Q to make its angles 90˚ and they will look nicer.
And a second thing is that when you finish editing in one area (e.g. state/ country) you can upload your changes to OSM before moving to the next one. This way you help people to better see what you have contributed.

Cheers
eteb3 (2023-08-14 11:16:30+00:00): Hi, 

I see you restored the names and am interested why. I wonder if name= should not be translated? To say "Kingdom" alone without specifying is not meaningful unless in Dutch?

So perhaps translate int_name but not name?