piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Oscar Bolorino (2021-03-04 11:29:39+00:00): Entre las coordenadas: 41.32946503290365, 2.0218619239750915 y 41.32828261690227, 2.021622011323493 es un huerto privado y cerrado al paso.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
andi9876 (2021-03-13 07:10:17+00:00): edited
limes11 (2021-03-04 22:41:14+00:00): Hallo Ro_Ver, 

bitte unterlasse Löschungen von Objekten, deren Bedeutung du nicht verstehst. Das sind keine Wege sondern
Abhänge/Böschungen. Wir entfernen diese in osm nicht, weil irgendjemand diese als Wege fehlinterpretieren könnte. Hab es revertiert.

VG, Limes
DD1GJ (2021-03-04 23:28:53+00:00): Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=821052#p821052
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:41:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
gpserror (2021-03-10 04:01:03+00:00): phone number appears to have been lost when moving the POI to the building itself.  Please make sure you transfer all information if you are making moves like this, and when you do make a point to building transition, please also verify the information.
gpserror (2021-03-10 04:03:41+00:00): also note that both this building and the building to the north are the same motel complex.  The POI was used to have some semblance that both buildings are part of the same motel.  (Data from: drive by local visit within 4 months)
SomeoneElse (2021-04-05 09:08:17+00:00): Hello Riyana_Shrestha,
It looks like you've ignored the advice above.   Information is sstill missing, so it looks like we'll have to revert these changes.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Kovoschiz (2021-03-04 08:48:00+00:00): Please see the difference between `natural=saddle` and `mountain_pass=yes`. `junction=yes` is what I found using elsewhere in the world.
Kovoschiz (2021-03-04 09:07:30+00:00): Some users see more importance on the intersection, instead of the lowest point of the trail.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Kovoschiz (2021-03-04 08:49:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100399427
literan (2021-03-08 21:17:19+00:00): мы наносим на карту только реально существующие на местности магазины. Интернет-магазины не вносим
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Luzandro (2021-03-06 06:44:38+00:00): Hallo,
ist es wirklich sinnvoll, diesen Innenhof überhaupt und insbesondere als "öffentlichen Platz" zu erfassen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100401165
Luzandro (2021-03-06 06:49:27+00:00): die Mauer habe ich eingezeichnet
Lett1 (2021-03-06 06:51:18+00:00): Entschuldigung für den schlechten edit. Im nachhinein gesehen verfehlt er komplett mein Ziel das Grundstück korrekt zu definieren.  Wir würde ich am besten vorgehen bei so einem fall? auf der fertigen karte sieht es nähmlich so aus als ob man einfach von der seite hineinspazieren kann.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100401165
Luzandro (2021-03-06 15:32:08+00:00): Mittlerweile sollte die Mauer auf osm.org sichtbar sein, die Platz-Fläche kann man damit wohl löschen.

siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier=wall?uselang=de

im id-Editor unter "Mauer" zu finden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100401165
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
user_5359 (2021-03-04 15:17:03+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
GlobalID=35c83a6b-52cc-4dcb-aae4-c8e9c4292765
OBJECTID=9
ZID=8
Please explain the source of this information and the *meaning* of the keys.

By the the camera doesn't have names, please move the key name to key ref.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Hjart (2021-03-19 11:11:31+00:00): Please note that foliage and growth fools a lot of new mappers. I've readjusted this lake, so that it again reflects the actual shore.
ParqueRodo (2021-03-22 08:35:14+00:00): Hi Hjart, thank you for pointing this out and making the fix here. I’ll be sure to avoid mapping around foliage and vegetative growth going forward.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
peppone84 (2021-04-19 21:07:44+00:00): Hallo, ein Teil des Radweges am nördlichen Teil der Asamstraße wurde ja mit diesem Changeset 100403743 gelöscht. Der Radweg ist noch da, aber nur auf der nordöstlichen Seite der Asamstraße zwischen Feselenstraße und Südlicher Ringstraße. Auf der südöstlichen Seite gibt es keinen Radweg. Aktuell ist der Radweg auf beide Seiten der Straße selbst gelegt. Warum hast Du das so geändert?
geo_roads (2021-03-10 01:21:24+00:00): Hi PoppyMercuryID, thanks for mapping. Can you use more detailed changeset comments to describe what you are mapping? You created some overlapping highways here, which I’ve fixed.

Hai PoppyMercuryID, terima kasih atas pemetaannya. Dapatkah Anda menggunakan komentar perubahan yang lebih rinci untuk menjelaskan apa yang Anda petakan? Anda membuat beberapa jalan raya yang tumpang tindih di sini, yang telah saya perbaiki.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-04 09:55:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia/Admin_Boundaries_of_Regions_and_Governorates_Import
Gazer75 (2021-03-05 16:24:02+00:00): Taggen motorroad=yes impliserer foot=no og bicycle=no så det lagar berre meir unødvendig tagging. Er ruteren sitt ansvar å lese denne taggen først.
TrondSBuskerudbyen (2021-03-06 10:58:15+00:00): Beklager. Det visste jeg ikke. Kan rette på det. Takk for tilbakemelding.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-04 09:55:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia/Admin_Boundaries_of_Regions_and_Governorates_Import
Reinhard12 (2021-03-05 08:31:53+00:00): Hallo TUBSmail, ich habe mir erlaubt, bei 6 Gebäuden roofshape in roof:shape zu ändern.
Gruß Reinhard
s8evq (2021-03-04 09:07:55+00:00): Source was ook nog GRB (voor naamgeving)
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:46:44+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:46:53+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Dino Michelini (2021-03-04 17:37:27+00:00): Alcune segnalazioni: 1) il name delle route va messo solo se il percorso ha un nome proprio (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Percorsi_escursionistici); in questo caso non andava messo. 2) non si tratta di abete ma di pino di monterey
Dino Michelini (2021-03-05 10:47:18+00:00): Il "percorso di collegamento" è noto tra i biker del marathon del lago di Bracciano come "discesa delle Vasca"
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:46:58+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:47:02+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:47:07+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:47:16+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:47:21+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:47:26+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:47:31+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:47:36+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:49:12+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
hauke-stieler (2021-03-04 12:10:39+00:00): Hi,

zwei Dinge, die mir bei deinen Änderungen aufgefallen sind:

1. highway=pedestrian passt hier nicht wirklich für das kleine Stückchen um die Bank rum. Das ist wirklich eher für größere Flächen gedacht, vor allem eben Fußgängerzonen oder ähnliches.

2. Nur ein Tipp, der auch im Online-Editor funktionieren müsste: Mit dem shortcut "o" kannst du Dinge exakt rund machen (wie z.B. die Mauer bei dem Aussichtspunkt). Hat sonst keinen großen Effekt, sieht dann einfach netter aus :D

Hab beide Punkte mal angepasst.

Grüße
Hauke
Arietigue (2021-03-12 09:04:06+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your comments.

Re. 1, I was attempting to highlight that the small area on the edge of the lake is a nice spot partially because the surface is a wooden platform.

It is similar to the slightly larger pier on the western side of the lake. But it's not really a pier hence my attempt at finding an appropriate tag.

Is there a more appropriate tag or do you suggest I simply not map such features (and remove them as you have done)?

Thanks.
hauke-stieler (2021-03-12 16:05:51+00:00): Hi,

thanks for broaching the subject again. I discussed the topic with some other local mappers and we came to the conclusion, that "area:highway=footway" with "surface=wood" is the correct tagging for this. I already added the area according to the tagging scheme describes in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway%3Dfootway

Hauke
Arietigue (2021-03-14 12:11:54+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for getting back to me with your advice, and for asking around for what was sensible/consistent/appropriate. It can be hard to know what's reasonable for these smaller details.

Regards,
Tilia_J (2021-03-04 10:49:17+00:00): Alle wijzigingen van vanochtend teruggedraaid wegens (herhaldelijk) vandalisme:

100407058
100407113
100407190
100407257
100407270
100407298
100407325
100407349
100407478
100407494
100407653
100407775
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-03-04 19:29:21+00:00): Hallo 8hjsC7KP,
nochmals die Bitte den name Tag nicht für Beschreibungen von Objekten zu verwenden. "Mülleimer" ist kein Name. Das es ein Mülleimer ist, wird durch amenity=waste_basket ausreichend beschrieben. Bitte bei Name nur echte Eigennamen eintragen.
8hjsC7KP (2021-03-04 22:10:15+00:00): Moin Roger,

danke Dir vielmals für den Hinweis!

Angenehmen Abend noch wünscht
8hjsC7KP
alessandrocarmeli (2021-03-06 18:08:25+00:00): del tipo no?
tux67 (2021-03-04 09:51:04+00:00): Hallo TiSch,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Das von dir eingezeichnete Gebäude ist auf keinem der aktuellen Luftbilder oder in den ALKIs Daten zu sehen. Auch hast du beim hochladen keine Quelle angegeben (das solltest du bitte immer machen). Auf was basiert also deine Änderung?
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100408419
TiSch (2021-03-04 11:05:09+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für das Feedback! Das Gebäude ist aktuell lediglich bei Luftbildkarten von Google zu sehen. Meine Quelle ist mein local Knowledge. Ich habe gesehen, dass bereits ein fixme hinzugefügt wurde. Der Gebäudeumriss ist dementsprechend nicht 1:1.
tux67 (2021-03-04 11:28:13+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Als Hinweis für dich: Google ist Lizenztechnisch keine zulässige Quelle für OSM.
Gruß tux67
Cascafico (2021-03-04 13:42:45+00:00): Hai cancellato tag wikidata e wikipedia. Tuto ben?
Cascafico (2021-03-04 13:49:17+00:00): Per cortesia, vuoi fornire le motivazioni che ti spingono a fare tutte queste modifiche? Purtroppo OSM si basa sul lavoro di volontari e, non avendo molto tempo da dedicarti, dovremo cancellare in toto il tuo lavoro. Non perdere tempo quindi ad inserire modifiche utili.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100408521
alessandrocarmeli (2021-03-04 15:31:02+00:00): Per favore non vandalizzare
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100408521
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-04 09:55:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia/Admin_Boundaries_of_Regions_and_Governorates_Import
user_2066394 (2021-03-19 20:59:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100152216
tux67 (2021-03-04 10:27:48+00:00): Auch hier: bitte gib eine Quelle an. z.B. eine GPS Track. Wenn du das nur geschätzt hast, dann setze bitte ein fixme an den Weg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Markiere_deine_Sch.C3.A4tzungen
 
Auch das was du als Name angegeben hast gehört in eine description. 
Das name Feld verwenden wir bei OSM nur für "echte" Namen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100409652
user_2066394 (2021-03-04 17:07:03+00:00): Den alten Knoten hätte man nicht weiterverwenden können?
PT-53 (2021-03-04 16:52:06+00:00): Friendly_Ghost,
woher hast Du die Info, daß es sich z.B. hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/578984064/history
um ein Abklingbecken handelt ?
Aus dem Luftbild ist nur eine Wasserfläche zu erkennen.
Fragende Grüße
Friendly_Ghost (2021-03-04 20:09:29+00:00): Guten Tag PT-53,
entschuldiguging, ich verstehe nur ein bisschen Deutsch. Ich habe Overpass Turbo benutzt für "reservoir_type=tailings". Das ist veraltet und wir haben jetzt "man_made=tailings_pond". Ich habe nur die Stichworte getauscht. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtailings_pond 
Freundliche Grüße
PT-53 (2021-03-05 07:33:20+00:00): Hallo Friendly_Ghost, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Das Merkmal
reservoir_type=tailings
hatte ich übersehen. 
Sorry
Friendly_Ghost (2021-03-05 12:36:53+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
Das ist kein problem. Es ist immer gut das du fragst und das wir einander verstehen.
Schönes Wochenende :)
pitscheplatsch (2021-03-05 07:38:29+00:00): Looks like #vandalism
Please, revert your changeset!

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=100410395#18/21.01851/105.80803

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
literan (2021-03-08 21:14:03+00:00): и зачем вы тут все поломали? подъезд удалили, одноэтажную пристройку  поломали (она с многоэтажной частью - единое здание). Придется откатить.
devatrun (2021-03-08 21:26:06+00:00): Не знаю о каком подъезде речь, но одноэтажная пристройка не является единым зданием с двумя башнями. До исправления, одноэтажное офисное здание считалось 22-х этажным.
literan (2021-03-09 06:38:12+00:00): так надо разбить здание на части, и повесить на каждое из них свою этажность, а не превращать в два здания. Если слишком сложно - ставьте заметку.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5098839504/history - подъезд вот этот вы удалили
Bert Araali (2021-03-06 21:28:48+00:00): Hello, you changed the highway tag of some roads. Good, it was wrong anyway.  However, roads that give access to multiple houses are residential.  You used unclassified. Unclassified, that you used, is for roads like connecting neighbourhoods.  An access road to a single house is highway=service and service=driveway.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa.  If you need any help, please do ask. Greetings, Bert Araali.
Mannivu (2021-03-04 13:42:50+00:00): Se c'è anche un'azienda agricola, bisogna indicare l'azienda su un nodo a sé con indicato la tipologia di azienda (vitivinicola? formaggi? salumi?). Inoltre, gli indirizzi sarebbe meglio indicarli non sulle aree, ma su nodi a sé stanti. Piccola nota aggiuntiva: nel riassunto delle modifiche è meglio indicare cosa è stato fatto, in modo da far capire anche agli altri utenti che tipo di modifiche si troveranno a controllare; qualcosa di meno generico rispetto a un "Va bene?" :D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100411129
Mannivu (2021-03-04 13:44:13+00:00): Sono abbastanza certo che l'oratorio di Morengo non sia di forma circolare. C'è qualcosa che di sicuro va rivisto.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100411598