piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2020-09-12 23:25:33+00:00): If the road is tagged as highway=residential then unless it is gated it's usually not private. If the road is a service road then it can be considered private.

One other consideration - if the road is not maintained by a local agency then it's considered privately maintained. In OSM we tag that as operator=*.  It still can be a residential road. 

We consider driveways to be private because the only reason they exist is to access a home so there is no need to add the tag access=private. 

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90805887
stevehi11 (2020-09-18 21:19:19+00:00): This private road is gated from time to time, but is usually left open.
ZLima12 (2021-10-26 04:59:56+00:00): Hi,

Please don't tag ramps with things like name="NY 199 Ramp". If you really need to satisfy a validator, maybe noname=yes would work?
convissor (2021-10-26 11:12:43+00:00): Think I named it so people navigating and editing the relation can read where the relation goes. Unnamed ways are awkward.
convissor (2021-10-26 11:13:22+00:00): I didn't notice anything in the names section of the manual saying not to do this.
ZLima12 (2021-10-26 15:26:56+00:00): From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name :

Do not use name=* if:
...
- The feature is known by a generic term or description. Use a feature tag to indicate the type in a language-neutral, machine-readable way. You can also use description=* or note=* if other tags do not quite express what differentiates the feature from others of the same type.

In this case, I think a "generic term or description" would be something like "the ramp from NY-199 to NY-32", or simply "NY-199 Ramp". Basically, if the name is just describing what it is, that's better left to other tags. "Frank Sottile Boulevard" is an example of a name, where it's more than just a description of the object.
eggie (2020-09-13 10:07:28+00:00): reverted by changeset  #90815076

What do you mean with school ?  
Your edits are all over Europe!
SecretOfSence (2020-09-15 12:09:41+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Главное правило OSM - рисуй то, что на земле. Зачем вы вносите свои фантазии в общую карту? 
Пройдитесь по парку и вы без проблем определите его настоящие границы.

Верните пожалуйста фактические границы на место, заранее спасибо.
Dinamik (2020-09-15 20:36:24+00:00): Здравствуйте! В OpenStreetMap могут вноситься не только "физические" объекты, но и "административные". Например, "физические" объекты - тут дерево, тут вода, а тут гора. "Административные" объекты - страны, районы, муниципальные образования, иные объекты, имеющие границы, формально устанавливаемые человеком. Ивановский сад как "административный" объект - область, имеющая конкретные границы, площадь, предназначение. Этот объект вполне может быть обозначен как leisure=park + name=Ивановский сад. Если за пределами Ивановского сада есть зелень, воспринимаемая на местности как парк, её можно обозначить просто как leisure=park. Таким образом, в базе будут фигурировать и границы сада, и видимые Вам границы зелени.
Anton Khorev (2020-09-21 15:27:54+00:00): Для тех, кто перерисовывает РГИС - там есть разные слои, в которых обозначены сады и парки:

Дополнительные сведения / Зеленые насаждения / ЗНОП городского значения

Адресная система / Площадные объекты

Объекты культурного наследия / Объекты культурного наследия

Некоторые парки в них существенно различаются: площадью, количеством, названиями.
nairo5913 (2020-09-14 00:38:20+00:00): Bonjour,

Je te contact pour te signaler que tu a publier tes tests.
Groupe de modification :

* #90806306
* #90806301
* #90806293

et qu’ils ont déplacer plusieurs nœud.
nairo5913 (2020-09-14 01:19:51+00:00): Re, j’ai réussi à annuler tes groupes de modifications. 
Cordialement,
Florian
KipatchiBestOf (2020-09-15 14:59:00+00:00): D'accord merci. Je pensais pas que ça allait l'envoyer vraiment. Comment tu as fait pour annuler ? Car j'avais déjà utilisé Revert sur JOSM et rien ne semblait se produire
MikeN (2020-09-13 00:23:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use meaningful changeset comments:  - does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Mike Raust (2020-09-25 12:39:03+00:00): May you please tell the imagery which you've used?
MatthewAndersonUS80 (2020-09-25 17:14:01+00:00): ESRI Imagery and USGS topographic maps layers. Plus research done on Wikipedia. There are also detailed maps and videos of Wax Lake Delta provided from various sources online. The names at the Lower Atchafalaya Delta was done using maps from a 1980s research paper done on the growing Delta. I really recommend reading into this. Both delta's are the fastest growing landmasses in Louisiana.
Rostaman521 (2020-09-12 23:34:56+00:00): "Ulica Bartola Kašića" piše na prometnom znaku
aharvey (2020-09-13 03:35:29+00:00): hi, thanks for adding lanes=1 however this road is still accessible and open so setting access=no is not right, that would mean that it's closed or not accessible. I've removed the access tags. Because footpaths are not mapped here yes, best to leave off the foot access tag unless specifically signposted so that routing engines can still do pedestrian routing.
Leo Slager (2020-09-13 00:44:41+00:00): ik bedoel: liften op station Haarlem teruggeplaatst.
reverted changesets 90758038, 90757995,90757542
Kovoschiz (2020-09-13 07:16:28+00:00): Again, merging roundabout breaks bus routes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90808039
Kovoschiz (2020-09-13 07:13:09+00:00): Please don't merge roundabout sections for no reason. This breaks bus routes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90808048
Kovoschiz (2020-09-13 07:21:37+00:00): Allow me to explain that `junction=roundabout` on a line means it makes up a roundabout only. It doesn't represent a single roundabout. Some other data representation would be used for collecting a single junction. This avoids breaking routes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90808063
Kovoschiz (2020-09-13 07:36:46+00:00): The only correction you need to edit in is add `junction=roundabout` to the ones without
Korgi1 (2020-09-16 16:28:33+00:00): sorry
FreedSky (2020-09-13 03:47:00+00:00): 这个编辑集合恢复了前几年OSM在钓鱼岛附近的状态，事实证明这个状态能避免更多编辑战。
各方势力均没有长期驻扎在岛屿，岛屿周围的海域都有各方船只巡视。在没有任何一方长期登陆岛屿驻扎的新闻出现之前，不建议将其边界归属任何国家的行政单位下。
FreedSky (2020-09-13 03:49:33+00:00): This edit collection restores the OSM's state near the Diaoyu Islands in previous years, and it turns out that this state can avoid more edit wars.
Until there is news of any party landing on the island for a long time, it is not recommended to assign its border to the administrative unit of any country.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-13 16:04:28+00:00): You removed "Do not edit to change the status of these islands or revert edits doing so without first contacting the Data Working Group." from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262104787/history

Jave you contacted DWG before doing this?
damember (2020-09-21 09:57:19+00:00): Where is the rule that multinational conflict areas on uninhabited islands do not belong anywhere?
According to the OpenStreetMap wiki, the following is a description of how to resolve disputed names:

“In the case where there are multiple local names, then if the government with effective and sustained control of the area has an official source of names or an official stance on a naming dispute, then that name is default.”
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes


Therefore, I tagged it as a Japanese border at changesets # 88546641 and # 88644868 because this area is effectively controled by Japan
You should revert your changes.
Kovoschiz (2020-09-13 07:26:23+00:00): Please don't use `oneway=yes`. This is not a correct style. `railway:preferred_direction=` is used.
user_11435438 (2020-09-13 07:29:24+00:00): 下次一定，睇見另一半軌道都係用咗oneway，就順手加上咗囉
Allison P (2020-09-13 03:25:59+00:00): Considering my luck in the past with "fixing" the river this went well.
user_5359 (2020-09-13 06:58:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You write a section, but you name only a point. Did you known: We have also the possibility to use a local name ((loc:name)? If you need help: You are welcome.
user_5359 (2020-09-13 06:56:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: The standard notation of parking slot is amenity=parking
aweech (2020-09-13 23:47:34+00:00): Hi, 
What did you mean by tagging this with resort=resort? Did you mean leisure=resort (which it is already tagged with)? Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dresort.
user_5359 (2020-09-13 06:46:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
nevw (2020-09-13 05:51:37+00:00): Hi Dimity
has this track to the figure of Eight Pools been re-opened? Has the block been removed too?
Do the tags associated with these need updating?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384742094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5006677508
Dimity (2020-09-14 00:54:06+00:00): Hi Nev.  I don't believe so. I was seeking to clear the note from the track heading north towards Burning Palms because in third party apps (in my case Gaia) the note is blocking the creation of routes along that track rather than the one heading down to the Figure of 8 Pools. I'm sorry I'm new to this so if I have done this incorrectly I apologise.
aharvey (2020-09-14 02:29:49+00:00): This signpost isn't blocking routing in the north direction along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229050520, while true that visually seeing this name here might be misleading, that's not a data issue. I think given it's so close it's reasonable to snap this node to the path so that it's linked to the closed track, or potentially use a relation to link it to the closed track.
You could argue that the signpost text content shouldn't be in the name tag (I'm on the fence about this), but deleting the name isn't a solution here.
nevw (2020-09-14 02:44:14+00:00): Hi Dimity
This note is not on the path leading to Burning Palms so unable to interfere with routers.
I have used this router to route along the pathhttps://www.alltrails.com/explore/map/map-91e8299--44
I was able to route by hiking using Gaia too.
The path to Burning Palms appears to be tagged correctly for hiking but is not suitable for cycling.
In view of what you have said, I have re-instated the sign info as before which relates to a different path to keep the OpenStreetMap.org database correct.
nevw (2020-09-14 04:36:08+00:00): Hi
I made a small stub of the path to the block visible and changed the wording of the sign name to make the situation clearer (hopefully)
aharvey (2020-09-14 07:07:14+00:00): I believe the name was the label on the sign, if we are changing the wording to be a description and not exactly as appears on the sign, that should be the description tag.

I'd prefer we don't split the way to make a small section visible.

Similar to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign you could place the node on the way and add a direction tag to make it clear which way the sign applies to. Then map renderers can choose to render it better. This is my preferred option.
nevw (2020-09-14 09:09:59+00:00): Ok. I will revert my changeset. I was not comfortable abusing the name tag further anyway.
Can I leave you to do your preferred changes because I’m not familiar with traffic sign tagging.
nevw (2020-09-14 09:29:53+00:00): @aharvey, I have reverted my changesets, returning to state of last Dimity edit
aharvey (2020-09-14 10:57:49+00:00): Okay I've made the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90860679 happy to discuss.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:board:title
nevw (2020-09-14 11:13:01+00:00): Looks good with correct tagging.
rbuffat (2020-09-15 16:24:33+00:00): Hallo fx99
Die Lücke in der Relation existierte, weil die Route nicht mehr dort durch führt.

Siehe Wegweiser Oppli:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/HnjvssnMzxnQFkzK7
fx99 (2020-09-16 06:17:34+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Wenn Du Dich da auskennst, korrigiere bitte die Route entsprechend.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-03 17:45:11+00:00): Hello NFZANMNIM,
You've used Google as a source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846842849 .  We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here, so I'll have to remove it.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-03 18:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 91911728 where the changeset comment is: Following on from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90956156 , reverting some more changesets in which Google was used as a source..
TomPar (2020-12-19 05:35:05+00:00): FYI: I just caught that in this changeset a residential closed way for Kings Grant got changed to a pipeline tag.  I'm presuming that was not intentional.  Changing back.
TomPar (2020-12-19 05:40:22+00:00): ...actually: removing said closed residential way because you also added a hamlet point which I think is the best way to demarcate this area.  Thanks.
Scout Jens (2021-12-29 16:10:54+00:00): Der Name des Weges ist vermutlich nicht "bad way". Eigenschaften und Beschreibungen sollten nicht im Namen erscheinen. Dazu gibt es die Attribute, die Du ja ergänzt hast. Ich nehme den Namen mal raus. Viele Grüße!
hocu (2020-09-18 14:24:21+00:00): If the original name is not offivially using Arabic script, please enter the name of the place in the original languge then use multilingual name feature to add the name in other languages/scripts. Also English name does not contain an English value.
hocu (2020-09-18 14:24:56+00:00): I meant "officially", not "offivially", sorry.
eggie (2020-09-13 07:10:40+00:00): Beste UD  
Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Probeer je svp te verdiiepen hoe een leisure=golf_course te mappen.
landuse=grass op landuse=grass hoort eigenlijk niet. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

golf=hole
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole
Draw a way way from the tee to the pin and add golf=hole.


MVG,
Eggie
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:48:40+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
M!dgard (2021-08-09 17:09:25+00:00): Hoi, je voegt hier rare data toe, bijvoorbeeld een link naar de Engelse Wikipediapagina van Crelan en de Deense Wikipediapagina van Eurospar. Kun je die corrigeren of gewoon wegdoen? Wikipediatags voor brand en operator zijn namelijk redundant.
Thibaultmol (2021-08-10 12:27:31+00:00): Ik zal er eens overgaan deze week en zien. Kan inderdaad wel zijn dat er zulke zaken tussen zitten.
Wikipedia tags voor brand of operator zal ik wel laten staan als ze de juiste taal hebben. Weinig apps hebben de NSI (name suggestion index) ingebouwd. Dus die wikipedia links zijn niet zo overbodig vind ik
M!dgard (2021-08-10 17:54:03+00:00): Je hebt de NSI niet nodig om van Wikidata naar Wikipedia te gaan. (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q217599) Ik ken geen datagebruikers die zo gedetailleerd gaan dat ze willen linken naar Wikipedia-artikels van merken, maar die kunnen dat dus gewoon van Wikidata halen.
pza (2021-05-15 00:11:20+00:00): I don't think this is correct, as the stubs are under construction already as part of the Rozelle Interchange project. Sure - they may all link to a sandstone wall until the rest of the project is approved/constructed, but the stubs themselves have certainly progressed beyond proposed status.
AgusQui (2020-09-29 03:30:56+00:00): En Openstreetmap no se mapean "cosas futuras" si está en construcción se pone landuse=construction, si ni siquiera está en construcción se mapea lo que hay en la actualidad.
Cascafico (2020-09-14 12:03:28+00:00): sources and licence needed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90811224
Cascafico (2020-09-14 12:03:57+00:00): source and licence needed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90811281
eggie (2020-09-13 07:17:41+00:00): Dag UD   Green C2 is niet helemaal correct.
Er zit een los eindje aan de noordkant. 
(twisted) 
Haal die er even af.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90811287

Eigenlijk hoor je ook greens in multipolygonen te zetten als inner. Dat is iets voor later. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-13 07:21:43+00:00): Je weg Green C2 bevat twee keer hetzelfde segment.
Het zit dus in de knoop. Maak de twee nodes los en ontwar de knoop. 
Geef een seintje als het niet lukt.
Eggie
Cascafico (2020-09-14 12:05:27+00:00): source and licence needed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90811299
muralito (2020-09-13 22:13:05+00:00): Hola. Gracias por las colaboraciones.

Tene cuidado porque algun error hay en como estas mapeando las alturas, que las lineas de interpolacion quedaron como calles desconectadas.
tastrax (2020-09-18 07:00:12+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tastrax (2020-09-18 07:01:09+00:00): PS - Welcome to OSM, have fun mapping!
muchichka_s (2020-09-16 20:30:10+00:00): До речі в редакторі ID є можливість автоматично спрямляти кути всієї будівлі, або вибраний кут, а також робити їх ідеально круглими. Просто на об'єкті натискаєте праву клавішу миші і там є опції "Закруглити" та "Випрямити кути". Це деколи економить багато часу
ottwiz (2020-09-13 08:01:39+00:00): The issue is like circa a few weeks old, just i didn't notice this was still in
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-13 10:24:15+00:00): Hi there, for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40256491 I'd suggest probably doing it as an additional tag for maxsped:conditonal=40 @ hgv

(got hgv from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Transport_mode_restrictions)
ScottWalkerAU (2020-09-13 10:40:18+00:00): Good call, thanks
Leo Slager (2020-09-14 00:01:18+00:00): Dag krum54,
je vraagt om een review:
oneway=yes hoort niet op een rotonde.
junction=roundabout is dan de juiste tag.
ik pas het even aan.
abakus_uploader (2020-09-13 22:30:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
zorglubu (2022-10-04 12:31:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Cette voie de service https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846859814 est-elle vraiment parking_aisle ? On a plutôt l'impression d'une cour d'école. Si jamais c'est le cas, on pourrait ajouter
leisure=schoolyard sur les deux cours.
Merci.
Régis Vrignaud (2022-10-04 13:52:22+00:00): Bonjour, oui c'est exact il semble bien que ce soit une cour (ou plutôt des cours), les tracés que l'on aperçoit avec BDOrtho IGN ou Maxtar sont très sûrement des endroits où les "enfants" se mettent en rangs( comme dans de nombreuses écoles), donc c'est une bien meilleure codification...Je te laisse les corriger ? Merci. Cordialement. Régis
zorglubu (2022-10-04 14:22:18+00:00): hop, corrigé.
Régis Vrignaud (2022-10-04 17:47:33+00:00): :-)
Nanu Shazbot (2023-08-21 22:07:50+00:00): What is the purpose of this?  It's inaccurate and misleading, at best.
eggie (2020-09-13 09:56:36+00:00): Beste Jlov.. het gebied van je edits is veel te groot. Beperk je tot een straat.
Het is ook lastig te controleren door andere mappers.
Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus kan schade opleveren voor de kaart door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend maar periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG
Je kunt dat versnellen door een import verzoek op het forum te doen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog identiek aan OSM account

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-13 10:00:02+00:00): Ik zie verder geen schade.Hoe import van gebouwen verloopt  in Vlaanderen heb ik even geen idee. Je zou contact met het Belgische forum kunnen opnemen. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=29
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-13 10:06:04+00:00): reverted by changeset  #90815050
eggie (2020-09-13 10:24:11+00:00): PB gestuurd met waarschuwing.
eggie (2020-09-13 10:43:39+00:00): Beste.. 
Begin met mappen in je eigen omgeving. Bv dat schoolplein. Voeg de bomen toe en het hek. Prullenbakken en grasveldjes. 
Maak je gebied niet groter dan het plein. Zet dan in je commentaar wat je hebt gedaan. Bv boom toegevoegd. Die niet te veel in één upload..
Vraag om een review van een ervaren mapper. Hokje aanvinken.
succes,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-13 09:40:32+00:00): In ieder geval nu een gesloten vlak... 
Ge eggie
skfd (2020-09-15 16:57:34+00:00): привет! обрати внимание что нужно менять и name:uk, name:ru теги вместе с просто name ) я тут пофиксил вроде уже
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90813441
Viktor_A (2020-09-16 11:07:26+00:00): Привіт! Дякую, зрозумів - треба комплексно міняти назви. В OSM я новичок)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90813441
Ahmed500000 (2020-09-13 22:10:38+00:00): I really can't understand what you have done, the roads are too tight and hardly allow  traffic so, why you are insisting on this classification?
sara qasem (2020-09-14 14:09:34+00:00): I changed it form living street to residential as i see it allow traffic and motor vehicle to pass normally.
Ahmed500000 (2020-09-15 12:37:13+00:00): I said hardly not don't allow, also, the living streets allow traffic. so, what's the problem?
user_11435438 (2020-09-13 09:37:59+00:00): 这位大兄弟，请问为什么要在梧州画了这么多不存在的东西？如果是规划中的道路，请不要标记为已存在的。
IpswichMapper (2020-10-18 20:36:38+00:00): You didn't make a building square in this changeset. You can do it by pressing "Q".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90813808
IpswichMapper (2020-10-18 20:41:36+00:00): You also marked this business as a "retail building", but more accurately, considering this is a "printer" shop, you could have chosen "copyshop" (a shop that provides copying and printing services).

Thanks for the contribution, though! Every shop on the map is good.
Cascafico (2020-09-14 12:06:43+00:00): non existent commercial landuse enclosing just sport statium and pitches
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90813820
user_11476446 (2020-09-15 10:33:03+00:00): Ok