piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2023-11-18 10:53:06+00:00): I've changed the name:pl of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261898083 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144168925 since it was obviously wrong - see comment there.
philippec (2021-10-19 17:09:12+00:00): Bornem school aed, bij een indoor aed is de location tag erg nuttig.
Rienux (2021-10-19 20:15:47+00:00): Ja ik zal het in orde maken ;) met foto
Dodko (2021-10-19 17:30:04+00:00): Značka shop=supermarket je nesprávna, nepredávate potraviny.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket
treba vybrať niečo vhodnejšie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:shop

Pri otváracom čase si dajte pozor na správny zápis. Pomôcka je na https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

name stačí mať len jedno Zváracia Technika, name:sk len ak by bol viacjazyčný názov.

addr:unit=výdajný sklad
to do adresy nepatrí
impiaaa (2022-10-01 04:33:03+00:00): This changeset deleted a building part, a dog park, and a mural. Why? Please restore them if it was a mistake.
impiaaa (2022-10-04 16:12:22+00:00): I've reverted your change in changeset 127004091. Please don't blindly delete data just to fix validator issues.
dorab_telenav (2022-10-05 07:44:47+00:00): Hello!
I want to assure you that it was not my intention to delete items from the map. It probably happened by mistake. I just wanted to change a tag.
Thank you for writing to me and for reverting the changeset.
And if this happens again in the future, please write again. Thank you. Have a nice day!
cserpell (2021-10-19 15:16:39+00:00): Hola qué tal? Para la próxima, para no borrar el elemento, se puede marcar como waterway=ditch e intermittent=yes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:waterway%3Dditch , ya que igual sigue existiendo la pequeña "zanja" en terreno. Probablemente por las calles aledaña se ha puesto un tubo subterráneo para canalizar aguas lluvias.

Saludos!
NieWnen (2021-10-19 19:40:03+00:00): Zmieniłem z clinic na doctors (tak wiki sugeruje, dla mniejszych ośrodków medycznych) oraz dodałem informacje kontaktowe.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-20 12:44:12+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've introduced a break in the Wye Valley Walk Relation (61495).  
Although tree cover doesn't show the path, GPS traces do: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892359052#map=19/51.75488/-2.67327&layers=G .
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cdO shows how things were before this change.  Do you know if the route north from the road to the footpath is actually blocked?
Best Regards,
Andy
Atanas Angelov (2021-10-20 13:00:48+00:00): yes the footpath is actually blocked from bushes and trees
SomeoneElse (2021-10-20 13:27:17+00:00): Thanks - When I find one of those I normally stick a note explaining what the problem is, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9183668826 .
Best Regards,
Andy
burrscurr (2025-02-26 18:13:06+00:00): Hi hanzlan,

I stumbled over Libya's maritime border, which includes the Gulf of Sidra with a straight line at 32.5°N. I believe this was changed from the usual ~12nm from the shore in this changeset. I found some evidence that Libya has claimed this area in the Cold War (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Sidra#Cold_War), but I struggle to find evidence that this claim ever achieved significant (or even any) international recognition.

I'm no expert in mapping (maritime) borders in OSM. Are there any special reasons for mapping Libya's maritime border at 32.5°N instead of applying the 12nm standard?

Best Regards
burrscurr
hanzlan (2025-03-08 13:18:45+00:00): Hi burrscurr,

thank you for your message and sorry for my late reply. Libya seems to have declared the Gulf of Surt as internal waters by this document submitted to United Nations (https://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/LBY_1973_Information.pdf), but this is contended by EU (e.g. here https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2024-000286_EN.html). I made the changeset according to marineregions.org (https://www.marineregions.org/eezdetails.php?mrgid=8372&zone=eez_12nm), which is normally very well researched. In this particular case, the international community is arguing the opening of the Gulf is too wide for internal waters, so feel free to change it back.
eggie (2021-10-19 15:48:19+00:00): Dag VR..
Dit is wat je hebt gemapt.

seamark:mooring:category	bollard op een node en op een vlak.

Bollard 	Small shaped post, mounted on a wharf or dolphin used to secure ship's lines. 

Dat zal niet het vlak zijn. 
Dat kan dan beter als man_made=pier met area=yes

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-19 15:59:18+00:00): De aanmeerplaats heb ik met bovenstaande tags aangepast. Je moet maar eens kijken.

MVG
eggie
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-12-08 14:27:23+00:00): Hola, arreglé esta ruta reciente que creó porque no reflejaba la geometría real en este punto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9183202580. Hice esto usando la capa de Strava, también te puede ayudar mucho, muestro en este tutorial cómo activarlo: https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-12-08 14:28:58+00:00): Un claro ejemplo donde puede ayudar mucho: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2857561
Mike Baggaley (2021-11-16 00:29:03+00:00): Hi, you seem to have just changed one segment of the roundabout to circular, rather than the whole loop. Can you please review?

Cheers,
Mike
literan (2021-10-19 17:03:03+00:00): "касса" это не название, не имя собственное
mavl (2021-10-26 03:19:05+00:00): Здравствуйте, Travieso. Немного подробнее:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
Travieso (2021-10-26 13:36:34+00:00): Понял. Просто там было написано только слово "Касса"
mavl (2021-10-27 16:39:30+00:00): Слово "Касса" с вывески можно поместить в тег inscription.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:inscription
literan (2021-10-27 16:45:18+00:00): так-то там уже пять лет стоит 
description=Касса "Крокус Сити Холла"
user_2066394 (2021-10-22 15:11:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7985090421
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7985090422
Da würde ich sides=* eher als falsch-positiv sehen, advertising=poster_box kann sides=* haben.
arcth (2021-10-20 21:40:23+00:00): Hello,

Which law are these changes based on? To my knowledge, the boundary in the Gulf of Riga is defined by the agreement [1] between Latvia and Estonia.

[1] https://likumi.lv/ta/en/starptautiskie-ligumi/id/133
hanzlan (2021-10-20 22:24:47+00:00): Hello,
these changes are based on the official list of coordinates for the Latvian coastal baseline from which the territorial waters (12nm) and contiguous zone (24nm) are calculated. These official coordinates were deposited at the United Nations in 2011 and can be found here: 

"LATVIA" https://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/STATEFILES/LVA.htm

The agreement between Estonia and Latvia defines the full maritime boundary between these two countries, but depending on the distance from the coast this boundary separates the territorial seas (up to 12nm), contiguous zones (24nm) or exclusive economic zones (up to 200nm, only theoretically as the Baltic Sea is too small for high seas) of these countries. OSM depicts international maritime boundaries at the edge of the territorial seas therefore the 12nm boundary in the Gulf of Riga.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
wille (2021-10-21 17:11:29+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112702812
Dodko (2021-10-19 19:58:07+00:00): The building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986220839/history
you left
building = yes
and individual points
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9116790508/history
destroyed = yes
that's right dad
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278941827
Dodko (2021-10-19 20:46:59+00:00): details here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:destroyed%3Dyes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
LySioS (2021-10-22 11:35:37+00:00): Bonjour Anthony et bienvenue,

Pas de souci avec ta modification. 

A+
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112703938
Dino Michelini (2021-10-20 06:56:37+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto nella comunità di OSM. Ti segnalo che la codifica del fontanile andrebbe completata in quanto amenity=drinking_water (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water) rappresenta un punto di acqua potabile per umani; se questo fontanile è utilizzato principalmente da animali andrebbe specificato non con una description (che andrebbe cancellata) ma aggiungendo il tag watering_place=yes (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water e la relativa proposta del tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Watering_place). Inoltre, nel classificare il fontanile access=yes è ridondante in quanto è convenzione sottinteso che tutto è sempre accessibile se non viene posto access=no (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access?uselang=it). Ti consiglio nel taggare di fare sempre riferimento alla wiki di OSM perché consente di aumentare la qualità della tua mappatura: all’inizio è un po' pesante come lavoro ma poi ne apprezzerai i risultati soprattutto se utilizzerai le mappe OSM su smartphone o GPS.
Mathias_ADAV (2021-11-26 14:40:51+00:00): Bonjour, concernant la rue Paul Bert, j'ai enlevé le tag construction, il me semble que pour les cas de travaux, le mieux est de jouer sur les restrictions type access, plutôt que sur le tag highway.
clay_c (2022-02-14 03:38:26+00:00): Hi champagnejohnny,

I've had to revert this changeset because it changed public roadways with residences to golf cart paths. Please be aware that not all paved roads surrounded by golf holes are golf cart paths.

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117375012
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
kawino85 (2021-11-13 18:45:38+00:00): Was ergänzt du denn so?
felipeeugenio (2021-10-20 01:35:55+00:00): Hola.
Building es para edificios. No para el recinto completo. Para el colegio usar amenity=school.
Saludos
ivanbranco (2021-11-30 20:54:48+00:00): Hi Roger,

what's the meanign of "Virksomhet=Selskapslokale og Kulturhus"? This is the only occurrence of this tag in the OSM database
mueschel (2021-10-23 12:29:57+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "hgv:semi-trailer"? Ich nehme an du meinst  "hgv_articulated"?
czubi (2021-10-23 13:38:10+00:00): Hallo Müschel,
da es nicht im VZ Tool war habe ich es von "irgendwo " aus dem Forum übernommen. Finde ich aber gerade nicht mehr.
Ich brauche was für  
DE:250;DE:1048-15. hgv_articulated sieht schonmal aus wie der obere hgv auf 1048-15 ;-)
Was nehme ich für den unteren? Oder gilt hgv_articulated  für beide?
czubi (2021-10-23 13:41:53+00:00): Habs gefunden
Glaube ich hatte es sogar von deinem Eintrag übernommen (#3)
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60396
mueschel (2021-10-23 13:45:09+00:00): Das sind hgv:trailer und hgv_articulated
czubi (2021-10-23 13:46:37+00:00): danke ich ändere es um
mueschel (2021-10-21 08:12:36+00:00): Hi,
could you check this building, it got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3119913489
eggie (2021-10-19 17:34:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...  Eigenlijk is access=no bijna altijd fout.. zeker in combinatie met andere tagging.
Er is al een landbouwsluis getagd aan de kant van de nieuwe wijk.

.. motor_vehicle=no staat ook al op de weg.. dus access=ni (gebiedverbod voor iedereen) lijkt me overbodig.
Dat kan beter weg net als bicycle=yes en foot=yes
Je kunt wel toevoegen agricultural=yes

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-19 17:53:46+00:00): Ik heb iets aangepast.. access=no verwijderd., net als bicycle en foot=yes  Dat is default.
 agricultural=yes toegevoegd en moped en mofa=yes. 
Je moet maar eens kijken.
Welk bord staat tegenwoordig bij het Karrespoor? Dat was altijd een C1 bord. 

Zoals je hier zie ging de routering al goed voor je aanpassingen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.6499%2C4.8223%3B51.6550%2C4.8145#map=16/51.6518/4.8309
gr eggie
NieWnen (2021-10-19 18:03:01+00:00): Tamten duży parking basenowy był ok, 
 bo to była jedna całość dot. w końcu basenu :P Jak chcesz tak uszczegóławiać to obczaj amenity=parking_space :D Je się fajnie łączy np.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953609251
trigpoint (2021-10-20 21:59:02+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I am a little concerned as to why you have changed ways 144589140 and 142495281 to prevent vehicles when they lead to houses and a farm. How do the residents get there, how does amazon deliver? Access=private was 
correct.
Cheers Phil
s4br1 (2021-10-21 09:01:10+00:00): Have undone these changes.
techdude1996 (2021-10-19 16:38:28+00:00): Wanting a review to make sure I didn't mess up the routes and that the roundabout parts are tagged correctly.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-15 14:51:19+00:00): Ciao. Sei sicuro che sul nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8828000747 l'attraversamento pedonale presenti anche un tactile paving? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1075453899528328
Ciao, Andrea
ivanbranco (2021-11-15 15:14:59+00:00): Non penso esista un singolo attraversamento con tactile paving in tutta Vercelli sinceramente (quantomeno non ne ricordo a memoria). Ho missclickato, grazie, sistemo a breve.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-15 15:33:22+00:00): Eh... in fatti l'ho trovato proprio così :-)
paunofu (2021-11-25 17:49:49+00:00): Esta relación hace referencia a la zona catalanoparlante de Catalunya, no a la comunidad autónoma, esta ultima es otra relación. Se debería devolver el nombre anterior "Català com a llengua pròpia a Catalunya"
jmaspons (2021-12-14 00:15:17+00:00): En paunofu t'ho ha explicat i no respons ni reverteixes. Si t'hi fixes, a diferència de la relació Catalunya, la que has editat no inclou la Vall d'Aran on la llengua pròpia és l'Occità. Si no respons aviat, revertirem el canvi
LySioS (2021-10-22 19:07:57+00:00): Hello,

The 3 regions you want to remove are labelled as "linguistic community" -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:political_division%3Dlinguistic_community.

It is not a geographical object or some political boundaries. Yet, it does exist as a geographical zone where people speak catalan.

If something's wrong, get in touch with the catalan community. That's beyond my skills
paunofu (2021-11-25 17:38:36+00:00): Hola MrDeeds39,

Como ha explicado LySios hace referencia a las zonas donde se habla valenciano, no de la comunidad autónoma, procedo a dar por solucionado el fixme y eliminarlo.
LucFreitas (2022-02-13 12:29:29+00:00): Obrigado pela correção do vandalismo
Kraan46 (2021-10-20 11:32:07+00:00): Please provide us with the proof of the tagging you added to this building. In the meantime all has been removed. Be aware this will be considered as vandalism and can lead to banning you from OSM. Look forward to your reply.
TheBestIdea (2021-10-19 17:45:46+00:00): Known issues: W 55th St in Jersey City & W 48th St in Bayonne are one way, but route uses them for both directions
blackboxlogic (2021-11-07 16:02:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150520918 isn't rending as land. Maybe the tile cache hasn't expired yet. Maybe the feature is tagged wrong?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112708640
EneaSuper (2021-10-23 19:10:05+00:00): Ciao, hai dimenticato un pezzetto di strada dopo la rotonda presso Piano Ateneo 😁
alkino (2022-01-02 21:51:38+00:00): Salut,
Je me posais des questions quant à l'attribute : ref:FR:RTE_nom là où le wiki dit de le mettre dans l'attribut name.
tartiflex (2022-01-05 18:23:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour la question, je viens de me rendre compte que j'ai confondu les réseaux Enedis et RTE. Il va falloir que je remplace les tags ref:FR:RTE_nom dans les sous-stations. Ça va me prendre un petit moment pour tout corriger. Cordialement
Владимир К (2021-11-15 10:09:14+00:00): Добрый день!
Вы затираете адрес по комплексу, когда ставите адрес по улице.
В Челнах двойная адресация
Пожалуйста ознакомьтесь, прежде чем продолжать
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Набережные_Челны
anastasia_ (2021-11-19 08:26:56+00:00): Добрый день!
Приняла во внимание, спасибо!
AndersAndersson (2021-10-28 05:52:10+00:00): Hej!
Här har det blivit en dubblett.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/994019974#map=16/60.8671/16.2135
Aerond (2021-10-29 21:19:19+00:00): ah rackarns. hur missade jag det där... Fixar snart, tackar.
clay_c (2022-02-14 03:38:26+00:00): Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117375012
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:18:04+00:00): Hi, You should include the tag surface for any road that you draw, also your drawing is quite crude, however to be a unclassified road in the woods, it dosent mean that do not need more accuracy. What you add wrong somebody else needs to fix, wich is doble work. So please try to be more accurate. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:19:25+00:00): also please use MAXAR PREMIUM background images. Bing is quite outdated most of the times...
mini-me (2021-10-19 21:45:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3535725369
Вы же понимаете, что это искажения на спутниковых снимках, и в реальности никаких сужений и зигзагов проспекта нет? Предже чем "выравнивать", посмотрит это место на других снимках.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9183594387
crossing=zebra в России не используется
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing
Buraddo (2021-10-20 07:22:50+00:00): No footway bridge here, it is a disused pipeline
Buraddo (2021-10-20 07:36:20+00:00): I solved the problem in changeset #112710352
Buraddo (2021-10-20 07:36:46+00:00): #112730136
berms (2021-10-20 16:02:02+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out and correcting it.
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:35:18+00:00): Please do not place generic names to roads or other objets. The tag name is for identify objets that have given names. name=road is NOT a valid name, the same for the Industry area that you named glade, it is a sawmill as such, but unless the operator is know the name keeps blank. Otherwise thanks you for drawing that new road
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:36:11+00:00): Again: Use MAXAR Premiun background imagens
JJIglesias (2021-10-19 21:39:31+00:00): those water areas are normally tagged as Basin, are artificially constructed for retain water, but are Not Ponds as such.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbasin
muralito (2021-10-23 13:56:09+00:00): Hola. ¿Cuando viste que estuviera flechado este tramo?
Tremendous Judge (2021-10-23 16:50:12+00:00): Hola, parece que lo fleché sin querer cuando edité los tags de bicicletas. Habría que revertir el cambio, pero ahora mismo no tengo acceso a un editor

Saludos