piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kartler175 (2022-07-25 16:08:20+00:00): Why di you remove outer members from grass multipolygons?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-72.48873&lat=45.90265&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Bruno Girard (2022-07-26 20:03:22+00:00): Hello kartler175, I am sorry if my modifications could cause you problems. I made changes to the Drummondville Golf Club area to use OSM to create the golf course for a golf simulation video game. The contours of grassy areas interfered greatly with the fairways and could lead to confusion (in the game). In practice, we can now interpret the areas of the club where there are no wooded areas, fairways, tee-offs, bunkers or greens, as areas of grass. Sorry again if this causes you any inconvenience.
archpdx (2022-07-19 23:57:36+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for mapping out this golf course. Please note however that the name field is not to be used to describe features in OSM, see https://wiki.osm.org/descriptive_name

For golf holes, the number placed in the Hole Number field should be sufficient unless if the hole has a dedicated name (ie 'Tea Olive'). I would remove the names from the golf holes, bunkers, greens, fairways, and tees you added in this changeset.

You can learn more about mapping golf courses here:
https://wiki.osm.org/golf_course
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-05 05:05:48+00:00): Still expected to be done in 2024?  It doesn't look like construction has started in aerial imagery.
user_11609320 (2023-04-05 23:02:43+00:00): I think so, I passed by recently and they are currently grading near the aqueduct for the bridge. they have some pictures on the caltrans website as well of the bridge that is being built.

https://dot.ca.gov/caltrans-near-me/district-9/district-9-projects-list/olancha-cartago-4-lane-project
user_11609320 (2023-04-05 23:21:14+00:00): I let microsoft know that the aerial view is out of date
nevw (2022-07-20 02:27:21+00:00): Hi
please refer to other imagery layers when mapping to ensure you are not deleting recent changes and reinstating an older state of the map. Maxar is likely the latest.
The roundabout you deleted and treed areas nearby appear to be affected like this.
nevw (2022-07-21 03:33:15+00:00): I have remapped this area.
ovruni (2022-07-20 00:22:22+00:00): Hola, en este conjuntos de cambios también se han agregado cruces en diagonales, ademas de un layer ficticio sobre la vía.
Rom1 (2022-07-20 18:35:16+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai fait des corrections suite à vos ajouts. J'ai retiré des chemins qui manifestement n'ont pas d'existence d'après l'imagerie. J'ai retiré également le tag ref:cadastre qui n'est pas documenté et remplacé par un simple ref le cas échéant. De façon générale, le cadastre n'est pas une source suffisante. Si vous en avez la possibilité, je vous invite à faire des repérages sur le terrain...
Pols12 (2022-07-20 21:54:38+00:00): Bonjour,
En effet, certains chemins enregistrés sur le cadastre ont disparu en partie. Toutefois, s’ils restent apparemment plus ou moins praticables (dans un champ par exemple), j’avais pris pour habitude de les cartographier quand même comme des “chemins non carrossables”, afin que le promeneur sache qu’il peut couper le champ en étant dans son bon droit, car le chemin n’existe plus physiquement, mais il existe toujours juridiquement.

Concernant la clé “ref:cadastre”, je la trouve utile, et plus précise qu’un simple “ref”. Je ne suis pas l’auteur des 29288 ajouts (selon Taginfo). Ça mériterait d’en discuter plus sérieusement.
Rom1 (2022-07-25 21:20:42+00:00): Bonsoir, si un chemin n'existe plus physiquement il n'a tout simplement plus sa place dans OSM. Certains utilisent le préfixe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:was:

Quant à la clé "ref:cadastre" comme pour toutes les références, la valeur associée devrait correspondre à un identifiant. Et j'ai regardé les résultats de taginfo. C'est plutôt surprenant car cette clé est utilisée à l'étranger. Il y a du ménage à faire...
pantufla (2024-06-19 12:49:25+00:00): Hola Alberto, he abierto un nuevo tema en la comundidad para comentar este añadido. Estás invitado a entrar.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/acceso-cerrado-a-raiz-de-zonas-peligrosas/114871
喵耳引力波 (2022-08-07 07:07:54+00:00): Fixed
下次出外业要记得擦腚
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2022-07-20 12:12:41+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your contributions. In the future consider synchronising StreetComplete before travelling long distances, to avoid large changeset areas.
More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Thanks in advance!
Mao-PU (2022-08-14 20:51:52+00:00): My apologies. The app I am using changed their login right after I started traveling and I didn't have my login information with me. I am happy to do any manual edits that will help disentangling the data dump – just let me know how I can help.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2022-08-16 09:23:05+00:00): No worries: it happens all the time ☺ Once changesets are sent, I don’t think we can split them. Most of the time, people are not aware of the large changesets that are created by such moves: I prefer to warn them that it makes the changes difficult to review.

Have a nice day ☺
jnighan (2022-07-20 01:40:54+00:00): Hi! The text you've written in the name= tag should be placed in the destination= tag. Highway exits in the United States do not have names, so the name tag is not used (exits in Italy, for example, have names rather than numbers).

Also, have the new exit numbers actually been revealed on the signs yet? I was on Route 9 an hour ago, and only the old numbers are present.
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-20 02:21:00+00:00): It's been a while since I have done highway exits.  Weird that it doesn't show destination as a default field.

I'm not actually sure if new signs have gone up.  I believe I read sometime 2020, but then it got delayed?  Do you think this edit should be reverted since if it hasn't gone up yet?

"Anonymous" is putting wrong exit numbers in comments anyways.
jnighan (2022-07-20 02:44:00+00:00): Yes, this should definitely be reverted unless the new numbers have been confirmed on the ground. As of 2 hours ago, the new numbers are still covered with black tape on Route 9 (same project as Route 72) and only the old numbers are shown. I'm keeping an eye on this and driving by the signs regularly awaiting the reveal of the new numbers. Who's "Anonymous"?
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-20 03:05:58+00:00): Reverted it.  I'll leave it to you to update when the black tape gets removed!  :D

Who knows, someone not registered?  All their Exit Numbers they put in notes are wrong.

I reverted the changeset.
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-20 03:06:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123829699
Ewen Hill (2022-07-24 11:04:39+00:00): Thanks @Nevw, I noticed this today in a 3rd party app and was going to remove them but you beat me to it.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-20 11:25:29+00:00): se é um rascunho deveria estar como proposed. e quando será concluido?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-20 11:26:06+00:00): do jeito que você colocou as ferramentas de roteamento já vão começar a usar essas vias.
KRNazareth (2022-07-20 11:41:19+00:00): Exatamente! As vias do novo T. Isidória começam a ser utilizadas no próximo sábado (22), coloquei como rascunho pois ainda teremos o mapa oficial final saindo no site da RMTC até o fim da semana, e farei as adequações necessárias para deixar mais próximo do real.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-23 21:56:54+00:00): entendi, lembrando que deve ser colocado o tipo de acesso para que não seja roteavel para carros comuns.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 02:25:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9898588949/history

Which building?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975671547 ?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2025-04-24 07:02:03+00:00): oh I can't remember now. it was 2 years ago,
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-27 22:02:21+00:00): todas tus ediciones han sido eliminadas. son puntos personales con nombres de personas, no de empresas.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-08 15:30:11+00:00): Please don't vandalize the roads by changing them to paths.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
λnko (2022-08-21 02:15:59+00:00): 您好，请注意在编辑时，如果遇到类似于商务，公共，住宅区域的场所，请您不要使用三级道路，您应该使用服务（highway:service）道路或者住宅区道路（highway:residential）
Fondness2888 (2022-08-21 16:02:46+00:00): 好的，多谢提醒，下次编辑，我会注意的。
marc__marc (2022-09-12 13:11:44+00:00): Hello,
whast's the meaning of  Add unsigned=Connecticut Turnpike  ?
unsigned=yes (or better unsigned=name)  is used to describe that a road does not have a name sign on the ground.
Regards,
Marc
jnighan (2022-09-13 23:43:53+00:00): Hi, Marc,
I have been misusing the unsigned=* tag, and I have since cleaned up my work. Connecticut Turnpike is really a historical name, so I've moved it to old_name=*. It was superseded by the Interstate route numbers, which split the old CT Turnpike into 3 separate highways. It is not signed anywhere and is no longer in local use.
ivanbranco (2024-05-08 22:12:10+00:00): Hi Kof Don_2,

what's the meaning of genus="Arbre Sandaré"
Isn't arbree french for "tree"? If yes, are these elements trees or shrubs as mapped?
Marek-M (2023-10-04 12:44:29+00:00): Cześć, dlaczego ten kawałek drogi dostał access=no?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079896354
Marek-M (2023-10-04 12:52:30+00:00): Ok, widzę, że kłoda jest pośrodku i pewnie stąd ten access :)
czebureks (2023-10-04 15:51:48+00:00): Tak, to się zgadza. Choć nieco przystopowałem już ostatnio z mapowaniem kłód, bo trudno to regularnie sprawdzać (czy już przypadkiem jej nie usunęli), jeżeli nie mieszka się tuż obok.
DressyPear4 (2022-07-31 10:54:23+00:00): Olá, evite adicionar nomes em caixa alta e nomes genéricos, se a estrada não possui nome pode deixar esse campo em branco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123829289
Supaplex (2022-07-20 06:59:14+00:00): 美崙？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123829692
nfx2851 (2022-07-20 14:24:32+00:00): https://www.hualien.gov.tw/circulatedview.php?menu=2924&typeid=2924&circulated_id=6058
該地有球崙部落、球崙教會，用這個應該可以吧
pza (2022-07-20 05:36:01+00:00): I just reverted part of this changeset in 123832598, as the suburb of Camperdown had been changed into a Park.
pantufla (2023-03-14 13:45:25+00:00): Hola Alberto, estás sin querer duplicando en varios casos las estaciones de servicios. Según la wiki esto está desaconsejado. Tendríamos que revisar el criterio en las E/S cómo lo podemos estandarizar mejor. No sé si ponerlo por la wiki de Venezuela o por el grupo de Telegram. Veo que también pasa con los campos de beisbol.
Jacksonville (2022-07-24 00:20:38+00:00): Hi RLakhani. At the moment, the road is only being used by bus shuttles to transport pilgrims (who can also walk to the site if they wish), but the committee does clearly seem to have plans to allow access to pilgrims to reach the site via cars in the near future. They have built car parks at, both, the immigration terminal as well as the actual Gurudwara. Should it not be marked as some sort of highway/main road?
Jacksonville (2022-07-26 06:42:31+00:00): ?
tastrax (2022-07-29 02:42:19+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
ZeLonewolf (2023-04-21 02:47:11+00:00): This changeset added expressway=yes to a county boundary (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1822195).  I assume that's a goof :-D
Baloo Uriza (2023-04-21 12:08:36+00:00): Fixed.
demon_box (2022-07-20 16:44:01+00:00): ciao! per convenzione nella comunità OSM NON si mappa l'indirizzo sull'intero edificio perchè per la legge italiana il civico identifica soltanto il punto (l'entrata) d'accesso all'edificio stesso.
quindi se lo sai taggi un punto sul perimetro dell'edificio (=porta d'entrata) oppure fai un nodo vicino ma staccato dall'edificio con tutti i dati dell'indirizzo. grazie. P.S.: ho già applicato la correzione
yonderboy (2022-07-20 18:36:43+00:00): Ok, grazie per l'indicazione. Ho fatto il tutorial ma mi chiedevo se esiste una guida per chi è all'inizio come me con indicazioni utili come quella che mi hai appena dato. Grazie
FreedSky (2022-07-24 01:50:18+00:00): 大哥你别自己新增社区啊 三道闸住宅区没有这个社区
Hon約 (2022-07-24 01:53:38+00:00): 网上有，可查
Hon約 (2022-07-24 01:54:41+00:00): 还有行政区划变动后界限估计会大改，最好清楚了再改
Hon約 (2022-07-24 01:55:14+00:00): 你是西湖区的吗
FreedSky (2022-08-29 09:02:31+00:00): http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2021/36/01/360103.html 你去看下我反正没找到
Hon約 (2022-08-29 13:28:00+00:00): 我是本地人，就在附近，确实现在两社区和渔业村旧地合并为亨利社区，我有图
Hon約 (2022-08-29 13:32:17+00:00): 不好意思我说过了，抱歉
Hon約 (2022-08-29 13:37:52+00:00): 至于三道闸的事，我问了桃源街道，他们给我的答复是在桃花路社区
Frans S (2022-07-31 12:59:17+00:00): hello. Thanks for mapping.
You mark quite a lot of objects as a ruin. To me 'construction' suits more in many cases
Best regards
FreedSky (2022-07-22 09:20:38+00:00): 二村早就并入3村了
FreedSky (2022-07-22 09:24:11+00:00): 我都不记得并入哪个村了，可能是1村，你改了我也不记得了。。。
Fizzie-DWG (2022-07-22 03:36:27+00:00): Hi again. Another one I have to ask - where are you getting all these unit numbers from? Thanks
FreedSky (2022-07-21 03:44:19+00:00): 不要用ID编辑学一下JOSM吧，你破坏了地铁线路。
FreedSky (2022-07-21 04:03:17+00:00): 不要用ID编辑学一下JOSM吧，你编辑破坏了本身闭合的行政边界
Patchanka (2022-07-22 08:38:12+00:00): bonjour
quand vous indiquez pour un lampadaire support=ground cela signifie que la source de lumière est placée à même le sol. Est-ce bien cela que vous vouliez indiquer ?
Sinon en général c'est support=pole pour indiquer que la source de lumière est en haut d'un "poteau"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstreet_lamp

Par ailleurs, quelques remarques sur la forme
- vous pouvez ajouter plusieurs objets du même type (lampadaires par exemple) sans enregistrer à chaque lampadaire
- indiquer "A compléter" comme commentaire au moment de l'enregistrement n'est pas suffisant. L'idée est de dire ce que vous avez fait donc par exemple "ajout de lampadaires" et de penser à citer la source (par exemple vu sur le terrain, ou la photo aérienne)
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-07-20 06:59:49+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=53.378277%2C-2.927389%2C17.28
Langlaeufer (2026-05-28 20:17:00+00:00): Hi, wo hast du denn hier die Fahrradstraßenbeschilderung bei Liebenhof und Bergschäferei gesehen? Mir ist sie bei meiner Tour am Montag nicht aufgefallen und ich kann auch nichts auf Fotos erkennen.
Langlaeufer (2026-05-28 20:21:50+00:00): Wurde das evtl wieder demontiert? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=998677425987753&focus=photo
Langlaeufer (2026-05-28 20:31:31+00:00): O.k. jetzt hab ich es gefunden:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1773924863979321&focus=photo
thetitoo (2022-08-05 00:13:51+00:00): Hello, please follow up on github for this wrongful edit:
https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/118#issuecomment-1205750092
thetitoo (2022-08-05 05:31:01+00:00): cc @harsh_19
harsh_19 (2022-08-08 04:01:35+00:00): Hi thetitoo, thank you for reaching out to me, as per your cited source (Bing Maps Aerial) and other updated resources I can see only building and considered to delete it. I have reverted the changeset and I would suggest to cite the source as local knowledge with the changeset and covered=yes as an additional tag for the building-covered area (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered). Happy mapping!
thetitoo (2022-08-08 04:45:59+00:00): Thanks a lot, I did the revert earlier.
Thanks for the tip, I'll add the covered tag 👍
喵耳引力波 (2022-08-07 07:06:43+00:00): FYI: https://osmcal.org/event/1449/
喵耳引力波 (2022-08-07 07:06:45+00:00): FYI: https://osmcal.org/event/1449/
bxl-forever (2022-07-20 23:41:43+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this and welcome to OSM.

I think some more information would be necessary to make the map correct.  You could help me by answering those questions:

(1) Only this short part in front of 2 houses is one-way, or is it at least to Clos du Sureau/Vliergaarde?

(2) The one-way restriction you created will apply for every mode of transport by default.  Cycle navigation will now exclude this street to enter Brussels.  We should expect to have roadsigns that grant an exception for cyclists.  What is the situation exactly, please?

Thanks and have a nice day.
FreedSky (2022-07-22 08:23:51+00:00): 请用JOSM，不要添加奇怪的关系删除关系。
bxl-forever (2022-07-20 23:50:50+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.

A tip to save time: in OSM the address on a building is only the street and the house number.  You don’t have to endlessly repeat the postcode, the city, or the country on every house, because there are zones that do that already.

One more tip: as you can see, your change created a large bounding box because you also edited tags on TEC route 366.  If you do this, it is always a good idea to also include this in the changeset title.  ;-)

Happy mapping.
abakus_uploader (2022-07-20 22:30:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-08-05 09:24:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124301536

数据过于粗糙，故已于上述changeset中回退。

若您对OSM感兴趣，欢迎加群t.me/osmchina或访问osmchina.org下联系方式，加入国内爱好者社区！
adiatmad (2024-01-09 04:58:24+00:00): Hello, do you mind double checking this very long & untagged way?
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1079940033)
adiatmad (2024-06-05 03:44:08+00:00): I went ahead and deleted it since I didn't hear back from you. Cheers
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152268419)
redd (2022-08-20 21:24:25+00:00): Merci!
mariotomo (2022-07-21 21:55:15+00:00): hola y recibas mi bienvenida a OSM en Panamá. Si vives en el área, puedes ayudar el proyecto OSM con observaciones de nombres, función, y otros detalles no visibles en las fotos aéreas. Tenemos un grupo Telegram, y otras plataformas más oficiales OSM.
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
iWowik (2022-07-20 15:23:58+00:00): День добрый! Неплохо изучать и документы, чтобы не вынуждать других мапперов вашу работу за вами исправляять или откатываь
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

вот Гаарина это что?

Проспект, аллея, набережная, переулок?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503793049/history
AnnaDr (2022-07-21 05:36:29+00:00): Окей, признаю косяк. Но тон можно было выбрать и полегче, вызывает желание больше ничего вообще не маппить.
Frans S (2022-08-24 14:27:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings hardly accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123838445
literan (2022-07-20 17:19:44+00:00): не надо писать в название "закрыт", надо или удалить точки (если навсегда), или поставить соответствующий префикс к тегам (сделаю так)
Jacques_Paganel (2022-07-20 17:45:56+00:00): А конкретно к каким тегам какие префиксы чтобы на карте поликлинника была обозначена, как временно закрытая?
Jacques_Paganel (2022-07-20 18:01:54+00:00): Теги нашёл. was: Не нашёл их описания.
Вопрос открыт. Как на картах обозначать объекты, которые временно закрыты. Если можно, ссылку на официальный документ сообщества. Хочу почитать про стандарты обозначения. 
Если в документации нет таких стандартов, то вопрос об обозначении временно закрытых объектов считаю открытым и обозначаю таковые "не по Вашему стандарту".
literan (2022-07-20 20:33:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

вы не писали, что поликлиника закрыта временно, вы писали, что она просто закрыта. Так что, возможно, вы там найдете более точный префикс
Jacques_Paganel (2022-07-20 20:38:12+00:00): Возможно closed: ?
literan (2022-07-20 20:42:40+00:00): если не на ремонт, то да
Jacques_Paganel (2022-07-20 20:48:35+00:00): Именно на ремонт.
Пока не нашёл подходящего тега.
literan (2022-07-20 20:52:38+00:00): обычно ставят префикс construction:
Jacques_Paganel (2022-07-20 21:03:00+00:00): Благодарю. Последую этому правилу.
Frans S (2022-09-03 14:18:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
These mappings will be reverted.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123839211
iWowik (2022-07-20 14:35:33+00:00): День добрый!
Кроме работы на местности, неплохо изучать и документы, чтобы не вынуждать других мапперов вашу работу за вами исправляять или откатываь
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
iWowik (2022-07-20 14:38:06+00:00): пример вашей ошибки
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9899233032/history
iWowik (2022-07-20 14:41:28+00:00): Ну и неплохо было бы посматривать на результат своей работы. Вы зачем-то добавляете точки с адресами там, где и без того внесены уже давно дома с адресами
Frans S (2022-08-25 15:40:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not accurate enough and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. (oversized)  Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123839460
SHARCRASH (2022-07-20 08:50:49+00:00): + military landuse updated