piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2021-01-28 05:01:34+00:00): picnick_site in the middle of the street?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98257401
daniel_solow (2021-01-28 11:35:52+00:00): Yeah the road is closed off to cars and as of yesterday there were tables and chairs set up by the subway entrance. Not sure if a better tag exists but yeah you can eat outside at Herald Square on the street surface
skquinn (2021-01-28 19:40:10+00:00): Everything is a "map update". The purpose of the changeset comment field is to describe what you did.

Also, please save before switching areas. Changes in Brazil and the US do not belong in the same changeset.
abakus_uploader (2021-01-28 23:32:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ivanbranco (2021-01-29 11:22:50+00:00): Ola Nahuel,

I see this is your first edit. This is not how you tag a place.

You used 
Base Operativa San Francisco Solano=Base Operativa San Francisco Solano
instead you have to do
name=Base Operativa San Francisco Solano 
plus adding another tag that describes what kind of place it is. You can search for avaiable tags on the Wiki.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-16 21:44:50+00:00): I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7884222484 isn't a _really_ small restaurant :)
Yorvik Prestigitator (2021-05-17 01:08:58+00:00): well spotted!
it is still a phone box, just me struggling to get used to ID editor
have now fixed it
Thanks
KB-01 (2022-03-21 01:05:48+00:00): please don't map things which haven't actually been built yet
futongrab (2021-02-15 23:36:56+00:00): Hi there,

I am just wondering, do you have the source for the name "West Kettle Valley Highway" used for Hwy 33?  Searching on the web or doesn't yield a result.

I've never heard of the name used locally and I did not find it listed on BC MoT Landmark KM Inventory as well.
DENelson83 (2021-02-16 00:09:52+00:00): I gave it that name because for most of its length, it follows the West Kettle River.
futongrab (2021-02-16 00:20:56+00:00): Hmm, then it should be left off as unnamed or assigned the official "Kelowna – Rock Creek Highway" name as the "West Kettle Valley Highway" is not known locally or recognized officially.
user_5359 (2021-01-29 05:06:32+00:00): Hello! Please don't add empty value. And why did you use the contact prefix instead addr: ?
b-holdet (2021-09-15 15:07:01+00:00): Tjek gerne om der allerede er sat bygninger ind inden du placerer shelter oveni dem.
De skal jo blot have andre tags sat på.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-21 14:37:13+00:00): Hello,
I'm not sure what's going here but at the very least you're "overinterpreting" the Bing imagery here.
I've just tried looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901013042 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901013041 .  If I move the things you've drawn out of the way to look at the underlying imagery more clearly it's not at obvious where to move them back to.
Can you explain how you managed to add these things?
Best Regards,
Andy
c tito young (2021-02-22 04:23:43+00:00): Hi Andy
Answering: Can you explain how you manage to add these things?

- These lines are clearly here.  Some are highly abstract but the shapes are intentional and directly visible.  Use Bing Maps as  the base maps and follow the traced lines and they expose the shapes.  Sometimes start with the eyes then follow around them heads and mouth appear and expose them  themselves.
c tito young (2021-02-22 17:55:50+00:00): Taking a concerned look at what "might" be confusing.  The image is an abstract geoglyph of a man with a sliced bleeding head and long straight hair.  There are some extra lines that may pertain to the image but make the image hard to see and confuses the viewer.  Speaking of viewer, I am sure you would need to be above the image to see this, making it difficult to view from ground level.  I will take a closer look on how its rendered.   You mentioned a couple of others but like I stated before, I avoid conjecture and I do look at these several times before drawing.   There is a "Where's Waldo" kind of way seeing them
tastrax (2021-02-20 22:39:11+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Totor (2021-10-29 04:51:54+00:00): Hi AntelopeCliif,
Are you sure that the corrections you made to Dona Rita village are actually better than the original state?
Roads that were nice straight are now curved (main street, queen street), Prince street going to Main is completely wrong now...
https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=98264301
This village is on a hill, so satellite pictures do not have the same alignment in the bottom and the top.
Please be careful when modifying other peoples work. You are editing all over the world. Please remember this is not a contest of "who has the most edits". Quality of your edits matters too!
I guess you gained some experience by now. Please revisit this edit.
AntelopeCliif (2021-11-04 00:16:12+00:00): Hi Totor, Thank you for pointing this out! After further review, I do see that Strava traces show some distortions in Maxar Premium imagery. I have now revisited this area and improved the alignment by using Strava.
LordPuddingCup (2021-01-28 04:57:12+00:00): First time submitting really, think i got everything right, the ESRI beta maps are outdated as theirs 3 turn lanes now into telegraph for instance. (think this is also why tesla's are messing up on the pohick intersection)
ralley (2021-01-28 06:56:27+00:00): Please don't edit the underlying map in an attempt to create personalised routes.  There are applications which use OSM as a base map with which you can create routes instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98264555
Priti25 (2021-01-29 04:44:28+00:00): Modified geometry
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98264775
user_5359 (2021-01-28 05:25:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
user_5359 (2021-01-28 05:23:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM, because you overwrite an existing business entry. You can add an second node in der building. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ralley (2021-07-06 23:28:52+00:00): Please don't put descriptions like "Great view" in the name field - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98265002
user_5359 (2021-01-29 16:18:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on way https://www.osm.org/way/28830259: What is the meaning of the tag ele-295=County Road MM?
Stephen L Arnold (2021-01-29 23:37:17+00:00): The attributes I put on the boundary of the cemetery came from a node with the same name within the boundary. It's recommended that the historical gnis tags be moved from a node to an area in this way.  I don't know what the ele-295 tag means, so I was uncomfortable removing it. It looks like it's been removed by someone else.
ftcat (2021-01-28 14:49:56+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The highways you have mapped are not actually highways nor embankments but ephemeral streams in seasonal wetlands. In this part of the world the seasonal wetlands are known as 'dambos' and during the dry season, May to November will be a grassland that will burn fiercely and so in some satellite imagery will appear dark black. During the wet season especially December to February they will be waterlogged and depending on how wet the season is will start flowing with small streams. Because they are open areas they form some of the easiest routes through the bush and so tracks may follow the edges and even the dry stream courses but only passable during the dry season. Away from the main roads most highways are actually tracks or very well worn paths that are not always passable by vehicle. Be aware most satellite imagery is taken during the dry season when the sky is cloudless, it can also be many years out of date
rab (2021-01-28 16:04:36+00:00): I think @SColchester is the person to adress
https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/10067
Priti25 (2021-01-28 05:32:34+00:00): Fixed geometry as per Maxar Premium Imagery.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-14 13:19:06+00:00): Hello,
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8370321117 as a "sports shop" but it clearly is not one.  Please don't add things as things they are not.  If you want to edit the map properly. use a PC, browser to https://openstreetmap.org, zoom in, and click "edit".
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2021-02-14 13:19:27+00:00): مرحبا،
لقد أضفت https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8370321117 كـ "متجر رياضي" ولكن من الواضح أنه ليس متجرًا واحدًا. من فضلك لا تضيف الأشياء على أنها ليست كذلك. إذا كنت ترغب في تحرير الخريطة بشكل صحيح. استخدم جهاز كمبيوتر ، ومتصفح https://openstreetmap.org ، وقم بالتكبير ، وانقر فوق "تحرير".
تحياتي الحارة،
آندي تاونسند ، بالنيابة عن فريق عمل البيانات في OSM
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-02-14 17:39:20+00:00): thank you very much
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
karson_ (2021-01-28 15:03:08+00:00): Hi, this road was correctly labelled Banbury Circle Northeast. 

The on the ground street sign reads Banbury Circle Northeast and the county GIS portal shows these houses addressed with Banbury Circle Northeast.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98268971
rkkomat1 (2021-01-29 09:40:34+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for wrong edit, we've used tiger data and modified the road name. Since you are confirming this to be circle we modified the same in the changeset(#98352166). Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
rkkomat1.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Kovoschiz (2021-01-28 11:21:17+00:00): Please "play" with map data offline or elsewhere, without uploading it. This is considered vanalism. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98246480
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:35:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:56:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:24:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:33:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
mariotomo (2021-01-29 20:14:40+00:00): hola andrea20vicky, te renuevo la bienvenida a OSM.
ten en cuenta que otros maperos ven tus ediciones y que es buena práctica explicar cuál fue el enfoque de cada conjunto de cambios.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
johsin18 (2021-01-28 16:47:48+00:00): There seem to be two yards next to each other.  The added road is put right on top of the wall separating them, I have the impression.  The road with the gate seems to be a one-way around the building.  Please improve.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=JNXqULUsKrifxBxgLcK9oQ&lat=48.785559795605465&lng=8.998764872265625&z=17
nmotupal (2021-02-02 02:27:08+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the presence of gate on a different road .I
have added the road based on the Esri world imagery as some of the surrounding entities are aligning with it. As per your suggestions, I have aligned the road with the Bing. Please find the changeset with the suggested modifications https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98541311#map=19/48.78533/8.99895 . Always happy to learn from the community.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:28:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
bostonmiller (2021-01-28 07:05:58+00:00): How to delete ways Markkas Nagar (901058258, v1). This one seems incomplete
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:52:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
osmviborg (2021-01-28 07:41:05+00:00): Du har omklassificeret vejene til sekundær. Sekundære veje har et nummer. Hvilket nummer har disse?
UffeKousgaard (2021-01-28 08:18:38+00:00): Sekundære veje skal ikke nødvendigvis have et nummer. Tag f.eks. Østre Ringvej, som har en ekstra lokal betegnelse som O2, men den har ikke et egentligt nummer. Ligeledes Ny Østergade / O1. Se ligeledes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary
osmviborg (2021-01-28 08:40:46+00:00): I DK bruger følger vi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Map_Features#Veje_.28Roads.29 Hvis en vej skal klassificeres som sekundær skal den være en del af det nummererede vejnet. Det er ikke tilfældet her.
UffeKousgaard (2021-01-28 11:19:47+00:00): Markeringen er nødvendig, ellers har man en isoleret O1, uden sammenhæng med det øvrige overordnede vejnet. Sammenligner man med andre korttjenester, så er begge disse også markeret. Definitionen på linket ovenfor trænger nok til en opblødning.
osmviborg (2021-01-28 11:30:08+00:00): Nu er OSM ikke en korttjeneste, men en database, så dit argument holder ikke. Det er op til renderen at skabe sammenhæng, ikke os som mappere.
osmviborg (2021-01-28 11:40:13+00:00): I Viborg er cityringen også isoleret fra det nummererede vejnet.
osmviborg (2021-01-28 11:42:04+00:00): I Aarhus O1, samme situation
UffeKousgaard (2021-01-28 11:55:32+00:00): Det beviser vel bare, at det er en dårlig regel, på dit link ovenfor. Se f.eks. til Sverige (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sv:Map_Features#Svenska_v.C3.A4gtyper_och_deras_m.C3.A4rkning), hvor man skriver "En väg märks efter hur viktig den är.". Ikke noget med at låse sig fast på vejnumre.
osmviborg (2021-01-28 12:04:18+00:00): Vi er ikke i Sverige.
osmviborg (2021-01-28 12:24:14+00:00): Rettesættet er tilbageført. Følger ikke de danske regler for highway- tagging.
Priti25 (2021-01-29 04:43:44+00:00): Removed unneccesary tag oneway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98274876
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:33:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
tomhukins (2021-08-06 13:27:21+00:00): In this changeset you have marked https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112587247 as "access=private" even though it also has "designation=public_footpath".  As foot access is permitted to public footpaths, it seems you have mistakenly marked this as private.  Can you explain the reason for this change?
amanura (2021-08-10 07:10:20+00:00): Hi Tomhukins, 
Apologies for the misinterpretation of the access tag. I have added access=private based on the presence of a gate at the beginning of the entity. I might have missed designation=public_footpath tag which made my edits contradictory. I have now deleted the access= private tag as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (109443984) with modifications. Happy to learn this from you.
Regards,
Amanura
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:45:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
eggie (2021-01-28 08:52:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback..  Svp niet de name= tagging gebruilen voor de functie
name=ondergrondsecontainers  beter verwijderen
operator=Parkeerplaats ?  Denk beter verwijderen. 
MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-28 09:08:51+00:00): Ij zie nu een node en een vlak bij die containers. het is het één of het ander. Kijk je nog even. name=  heb ik omgezet naar description
mapse
eggie
eggie (2021-01-28 09:39:30+00:00): Wellicht https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling  ?
Dus
recycling_type=container + location=underground
( for an underfloor-container)

Dit is toch wel iets heel anders https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_transfer_station
eggie (2021-01-28 09:58:16+00:00): Je tags iets aangepast...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:30:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al