piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DP24PH (2019-11-08 12:55:50+00:00): For best results, JOSM is a must-use along with the lifecycle "construction:highway=*" tags. Lifecycle tags will prevent premature rendering compared to "highway=construction" and "construction=*" tags.
user_5359 (2019-11-05 20:31:18+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways).
see realtion https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10254126
govvala (2019-11-06 05:47:12+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for the error.Thanks for your suggestion.I have fixed this changeset #: 76678164.
Let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
govvala.
user_5359 (2019-11-05 18:43:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You have added several contiguous buildings in this change set. However, the part where the buildings have a common wall does not belong to one building, but to both buildings (hopefully I managed to explain this reasonably without any drawing). This has not been taken into account in this change. This will create a lot of error messages that the building does not consist of a closed path.
chnav (2019-11-07 05:21:35+00:00): Удаление валидных данных и перерисовка заново.
Использование карт Яндекс, гугл, 2ГИС и других запрещено. Соблюдайте правила проекта.
За неоднократное нарушение правил проекта учетная запись может быть заблокирована, а обход блокировки путем созданий новых учетных записей ЗАПРЕЩЁН.

Правка откачена полностью.
chnav (2019-11-07 05:23:38+00:00): Удаление валидных данных и перерисовка заново.
Использование карт Яндекс, гугл, 2ГИС и других запрещено. Соблюдайте правила проекта.
За неоднократное нарушение правил проекта учетная запись может быть заблокирована, а обход блокировки путем созданий новых учетных записей ЗАПРЕЩЁН.

Правка откачена полностью.
Jose Luis Infante (2019-11-05 14:05:50+00:00): Hola,

gracias por la edición, pero hay que tener cuidado con unir las rotondas. Esas rotondas estaban divididas porque forman parte de unas rutas de autobús, es decir de unas cuantas relaciones.
Ya he recuperado las rutas.
Un saludo!
lasagna (2019-11-07 20:51:57+00:00): This section of Miramar Street is still under construction. You can see it on the left side of the live stream here: https://www.teleport.io/feed/n2gexldrqxbwahnqfz9l/view?accesskey=flSPyUY6lxjCZxI6mRW3objEyFHidK . I will revert this edit and leave the existing under-construction way.
qureahme (2019-11-08 14:48:06+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing my edit. I had added the road as per the latest clear imagery available in OSM. Thanks for improving my edit and helping me understand the ground reality. Let me know if you have any other suggestion.

Regards,
Ahmed Qureshi
mavl (2019-11-05 16:43:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Простите, а зачем вы удалили названия на русском и английском языках?
Geim (2019-12-23 21:00:09+00:00): Culverts dienen met layer=-1 gemapped te worden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742158511/history
mosstreet (2019-11-09 23:21:17+00:00): Откуда у вас данные о вами внесенных названиях улиц? Согласно кадастру названия улиц были верными. Названия вернул, если у вас есть решения о переименовании, приведите ссылку, на сайте города я их не нашел.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-11-05 11:55:04+00:00): what are you doing? What kind of test task?

Why you delete this objects?
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-11-05 12:00:17+00:00): I send a PM asking to answer changeset comments.
user_5359 (2020-04-19 12:09:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add address information and business information-
aquarix (2019-11-05 13:12:14+00:00): Hello hasaan22,
could you please explain what you changed so that the boundary line spans half the world, thank you.
Regards aquarix
ToniE (2019-11-05 13:28:09+00:00): Hello aquarix,

this is a known issue with. Some users in Iran reuse deleted nodes (13 years ago) from Alaska and tag new contents to them, moving them to Iran. See the small ID of the nodes: 77xxxx - very old nodes.

I don't now how this can happen, but deleted nodes shouldn't be reused that way - IMHO.

Toni
AndersAndersson (2019-11-05 21:08:37+00:00): Hello hasaan22,
Do you use some kind of plugin in JOSM?
aquarix (2019-11-06 00:00:55+00:00): Hello Toni,
yes I already recognized that these were really old nodes but I haven't seen where they originated. 
@hasaan22
As Josm revision 14460 is about 11 months old you should consider to update Josm and all your plugins as many bugs have been fixed in the mean time.
Regards aquarix
hasaan22 (2019-11-10 04:02:27+00:00): Hi. I made a mistake.
I update plugins and josm. I hope the bugs are fixed.
DiogoBaptista98 (2019-11-27 04:57:55+00:00): You destroyed peoples work! Bing aerial imagery is outdated! The most updated imagery are Maxar and Ersi. If you dont know anything about Lisbon please move out and dont edit on this area. I'm gonna fix all of your mess. Thank you!
Denise Merchuk (2019-11-27 11:59:25+00:00): Hi Diogo,

What I did wrong? I'm trying to help and not to destroy anything. This area seems to be different of what is already mapped here on OSM. 

Here are some sources I found: https://www.publico.pt/2018/01/13/local/noticia/no-braco-de-prata-vai-surgir-em-breve-um-dos-maiores-jardins-de-lisboa-1799176

https://www.timeout.pt/lisboa/pt/noticias/parque-ribeirinho-oriente-obra-arranca-em-fevereiro-012518

Also on Google Maps this area looks different: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Parque+infantil+do+Bra%C3%A7o+de+Prata/@38.7434243,-9.099657,413m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0xb32242dbf4226d5:0x2ab84b091c4ef041!2sPortugal!3b1!8m2!3d39.399872!4d-8.224454!3m4!1s0xd1931f47ae1db51:0xf5713f51ba606990!8m2!3d38.7430048!4d-9.0994859

Let me know if I can help with anything.

Thanks,
Denise
Filohipo (2019-11-28 13:32:50+00:00): Olá Denise. Como edita no Brasil, pode ser que entenda.
As suas edições em Lisboa foram erradas,
Veja aqui todas as observações feitas:
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8538194&commented
O Diogo Baptista conhece muito bem Lisboa e tem as ultimas informações.
Se não tem conhecimento local não altere nada. Se pensa que algo está em falta, edite, mas peça ajuda
Cumprimentos
user_5359 (2019-11-05 20:29:56+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways). Please see https://www.osm.org/relation/10260785 until https://www.osm.org/relation/10260790 ( 6 relation)
svvakkal (2019-11-06 10:05:43+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under changeset #76689668 as per your comment. I'll ensure to recheck the edits before uploading changes hereafter.
Regards,
svvakkal.
tomhukins (2026-04-14 14:15:38+00:00): Thank you for all your good work improving the map.

In the spirit of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only I have tagged four lime kilns you added with "name=Lime Kiln" in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181325145.  Please let me know if you think I haven't tagged these features appropriately.
itineris (2019-11-05 12:29:42+00:00): Discussion of the local community on this topic: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openstreetmap-hungary/kI94I-ZT4fk

Repo of the uploaded changeset is also referenced from there.
Supaplex (2019-11-05 14:51:28+00:00): 這好像先前是營區，現在國防部委託的生產工廠
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76646213
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
abakus_uploader (2019-11-05 23:37:48+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
DressyPear4 (2019-11-05 16:00:06+00:00): Oxbow é um local onde o rio mudou de curso e formou uma lagoa, a tag adicionada não está correta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76649933
Frans S (2019-11-06 16:06:45+00:00): Hello. thanks for mapping on this project
Please use the Maxar Std Imagery as the primary source. More recent and actual than the BING imagery and prescribed in the instructions

Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gjraDKIuYKQ9c7asnOlA4ioeZDty195U
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
eggie (2019-11-05 14:07:05+00:00): Hi Urbacheko

In the Netherlands we don't use leisure=park as landuse. We tag grass, tree, scrub.  
Only large areas are leisure=park and we tag leisure =park as a tranparant cover on top of the landuse.
I don't think the official name = Parque local.
Please don't add any parks in this way in The Netherlands
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-05 14:23:55+00:00): Removed park and added landuse instead.
You may have a look to use it as an example.
Greetz,
eggie
viloan (2019-11-05 13:52:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Frans S (2019-11-06 12:47:39+00:00): Hello Aileen Lin
Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please use the Maxar Std Imagery as the primary source. More recent and actual than the BING imagery and it is  prescribed in the instructions

Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gjraDKIuYKQ9c7asnOlA4ioeZDty195U
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
Frans S (2019-11-09 15:53:59+00:00): Hello Aileen, A close look to your mappings learned me that it cost so much time to correct your mappings that I decided to remove the most bad shaped mappings so that they can be mapped all over again by more experienced mappers. Perhaps this task is to difficult for a new mapper like you. When you have gained more experience mapping will go much better,
Best regards
waldhans (2019-11-06 22:37:17+00:00): geh doch mal hin! die Pergola gibt es. 
auch ein revert?
stoni100 (2019-11-07 12:38:47+00:00): Für mich ließ sich diese "Gebäude" im Luftbild nicht wiederfinden .... Pergola wäre für mich aber auch kein Gebäude .... Hier ist die mapnik-Darstellung echt ungünstig.... und es führt ein Weg durch ..... 

und revert musst du mir auf dem nächsten Stammtisch mal zeigen .... finde ich hier im ID nicht
Владимир К (2019-11-05 13:55:40+00:00): добавление покрытия, исправление пересечений
chnav (2019-11-07 05:41:21+00:00): Эмоциональные теги, не несущие информации, удаление тега здания.
Откачено.
Frans S (2019-11-06 11:56:30+00:00): Hello Molly, Thanks for mapping here
a request. Please map more accurate and follow the outline of the buildings precise. Do not combine several buildings into 1 mapping.
Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the righthand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degr angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degr corners

Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
abrensch (2019-11-10 18:54:47+00:00): Hallo rrissiek.

weil Du das motor_vehicle=yes von der Panzerringstrasse weggenommen hast, ist sie jetzt für Kraftfahrzeuge gesperrt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58992852

Das passt nicht zu der note, die das Gegenteil beschreibt.

Gruss, Arndt

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58992852
abrensch (2019-11-17 12:06:50+00:00): Nopchmal Hallo,

ich hab' das motor_vehicle=yes wieder gesetzt

Gruss, Arndt
Chanchala (2022-01-05 08:48:50+00:00): Does Goraul have the correct boundary demarcation, if yes then why it's scattered?
letihu (2019-12-27 12:37:51+00:00): Ist dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742207922/history
wirklich ein Gebäude, oder nur ein Dach? Straßen führen nicht so einfach durch  Gebäude.
gendy54 (2019-12-09 21:55:52+00:00): ok parfait.
J'ai supprimé postcode et city qui ne servent à rien en France
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76653139
RicoElectrico (2019-12-15 11:32:27+00:00): To chyba jakiś żart. Siłownia plenerowa na cmentarzu? leisure=fitness_station + fitness_station=stairs.. Schody to po prostu schody.
RicoElectrico (2019-12-15 12:01:53+00:00): Zwracam honor. Jest kilka takich obiektów w Polsce, edytowanych przez różne osoby. Powodem najwyraźniej jest tłumaczenie w edytorze iD - "Schody". Powinno to się zmienić na "Schody - przyrząd do ćwiczeń", albo coś podobnego.

Miłej niedzieli życzę :)
ISBM (2019-12-15 15:39:29+00:00): Spoko, dopiero się uczę. Wiele jest obiektów niejednoznacznych :(
RicoElectrico (2019-12-15 23:21:03+00:00): To po prostu brak w tłumaczeniu. Poprawiłem go, pewnie z nową wersją iD będzie wciągnięty.

Prawda jest taka, że wielu z zaawansowanych edytorów rzadko kiedy używa iD, może do szybkich edycji, bo tak to śmigają w JOSM-ie ;) Stąd nikt tego nie wyłapał.

Powiązany wątek na forum:  https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=771997#p771997
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 13:17:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6948604694/history has access:bus that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using bus access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus ) be fitting at least equally well?
reigi (2021-05-23 17:26:07+00:00): Hi tux67, der Erstanleger hat in einem note-Feld Koordinaten eingetragen. Hast du eine Vermutung, warum er das gemacht haben könnte?
tux67 (2021-05-23 18:47:06+00:00): Hi, ich mutmaße mal .. Die Daten stammen ursprünglich von der Seite von Käthe und Bernd Limburg. Dort sind zu allen Denkmälern auch die Koordinaten abgegeben. 
Der Wikipedia Eintrag sollte related:Wikipedia sein, da es kein individueller Eintrag ist. 
Auch hat der Erstersteller oft das Name Tag mit zur Beschreibung verwendet. Die Gegend um die Bismarck Straße in MG ist eine gute Referenz für die historic places Karte .
reigi (2021-05-24 11:53:53+00:00): Hi, nachdem ich versucht habe, mir alle Tipps von dir anzusehen, ändere ich mal folgendes:
- das fixme:wikipedia würde ich löschen. Dort wird auf "related:wikipedia" hingewiesen, aber erstens habe ich zu "related:wikipedia" nichts finden können und zweitens wird im (deutschen) Wiki die Empfehlung gegeben, für Sammelseiten den Seitentitel zu verlinken. Der Seitentitel ist allerdings, so wie ich das sehe, in den meisten Fällen gleich dem Artikel-Titel. Insofern ist der bei diesem Node richtig getaggt.
- der tag "name" ist in diesem Fall doch richtig, oder?
- den tag "note" werde ich löschen
- bei Webseite würde ich nicht allgemein verlinken, sondern sofern die Möglichkeit besteht, auf die Einzelseite zum jeweiligen Objekt.
Ich ändere mal und du schaust, ob du noch Anmerkungen dazu hast. Danke.
tux67 (2021-05-26 19:56:45+00:00): Hi, sorry ich hatte meinen Kommentar als optional gesehen ;-)
Die Namen sind in diesen beiden Fällen“echte“ Namen. Note Tag hätt ich auch gelöscht. Einen “deep-link“ hätte ich zusammen mit dem website Tag nicht verwendet .. Sollte man, soweit ich mich erinnere nicht machen falls sich die website struktur ändert. Dafür nutze ich normalerweise dann das url Tag.
reigi (2021-05-27 08:48:26+00:00): OK, vielen Dank für dein Feedback.
MikeN (2019-11-05 20:37:01+00:00): Thanks for adding these parking aisles - lots of great detail.  But perhaps more detail than needed - the usual OSM convention is that 1-way paths are needed only if there is a physical divider.  In this case for example, a Tesla trying to find the best route might have to take a longer path around the end of a parking aisle because there's no way to cross to the opposite direction.    Let me know if you would like me to fix this and you can follow the example for another parking lot!
rsperanza (2019-11-05 21:19:08+00:00): Hi, thanks for catching this! I made this and then discussed with a friend and decided I did it wrong. I would like to know the correct way to map it. Thanks!
MikeN (2019-11-05 22:38:05+00:00): I think I have fixed the routing.   The convention is to use plain service roads for entrances, and parking aisles inside the lot.  I did split the entrances into 1-way because it looked like there was a divider on the aerial image and Bing StreetView.    That will direct drivers entering McDonald's from Spartanburg Highway to the correct entrance.   Driveway is mainly used for entrances to a residence, but is not totally wrong in a parking lot.
bhousel (2019-11-06 00:26:06+00:00): Hey MikeN and mechrock - thanks for adding all these parking details to the map.  

As a rule of thumb, we often recommend using the `highway=service` roads to create a "skeleton" throughout the parking lot - the roads entering/exiting and main roads (e.g. where a truck may go), and using `highway=service+service=parking` roads for the aisles which really are just for parking (e.g. where a truck should not go).

I'm going to make a few edits to this lot to demonstrate what I mean.. Sorry for the nitpicking - I really do appreciate your work.. Keep it up! ✌️
rsperanza (2019-11-06 01:23:57+00:00): I really do appreciate the feed back! I have a couple questions though. For parking lots and the area feature, do you draw the area of the entire lot or each individual section like I have currently? Actually I see you edited it to the entire lot, is there a time when you wouldn't do this? As for labeling buildings, I just added Harris Teeter and noticed I know have (2) Harris Teeters. Is the area method the preferred way of adding a building?
MikeN (2019-11-06 01:50:31+00:00): Re: Parking lots - either way is acceptable.  Individual parking areas are drawn when micro-mapping.   A single large area is less cluttered on the map display.  The landscaped islands and dividers could be drawn either way.    For buildings -  if a building houses a single POI such as Harris Teeter, it is best done as the building.   For this example, copy the extra information from the node onto the building and delete the node.    The businesses in the side buildings would be as nodes inside the building since there are multiple.
bhousel (2019-11-06 02:48:09+00:00): Agree with MikeN that either way of doing parking lots is acceptable, however consider that each polygon will probably be rendered with a "P" in the center, so I try to just join them together and not make too many of them.

Re: Harris Teeter, I personally prefer mapping all businesses as points and all building footprints as areas.  I know a lot of people would say to merge the point with the building, but I prefer leaving them as separate features, in case the business closes down or moves, and it also gives you more control of where the point appears on the map.  Like MikeN said if there are multiple businesses sharing a building, you need to map them as points anyway, so that may as well be the way to do it always.
rsperanza (2019-11-06 03:05:10+00:00): Thanks again guys, super helpful and appreciated!
ghostrider44 (2020-05-16 09:54:19+00:00): Hallo Carsten,
du hast im Tammer Ortsteil Hohenstange etliche nebeneinanderstehende Garagen, die mit building=garages richtig getaggt waren abgeändert auf landuse=garages.
Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=garages wird landuse bei Garagen nur verwendet, um Areale, also größere Flächen auszuzeichnen. Ich bitte dich, diese Änderungen auf die vorher richtigen Tags zurückzusetzen.
Siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dgarages 
Gruß ghostrider44
ghostrider44 (2020-05-25 10:05:23+00:00): Hallo Carsten,
nachdem du dich nicht gemeldet hast, werde ich die Korrektur nach Klärung im Forum selbst vornehmen. Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=788286#p788286.
Gruß ghostrider44
user_5359 (2019-11-05 17:09:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add the tag lanes=0 to the highway https://www.osm.org/way/200528939? Please have a look on the description of the key https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lanes#No_lane_markings
byckel (2019-12-27 16:09:54+00:00): Waarom heb je hier twee maanden geleden alle gebouwen weggehaald? Kwam er net langs, ze staan er nu nog altijd, alleen met een hekje eromheen