piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
os-emmer (2024-08-31 09:53:45+00:00): Hallo Andreas Binder,
du hast hier vor langer Zeit mal etwas am THW Übungsgelände ergänzt. Kannst du hier vielleicht weiterhelfen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4411725
dval (2019-09-26 14:34:25+00:00): Здесь Вы улицу Маяковс. наложили саму на себя (один отрезок). Как так можно? Будьте внимательнее в iD, если не желаете осваивать JOSM. Жалко время тратить на подобные ошибки и их исправление.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 12:06:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6742471475/history has flag:type = commercial that was added in this edit
what was meant by flag:type=commercial ? How it differs from flag:type=advertising ?
viloan (2019-08-24 18:13:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GinaroZ (2019-08-25 16:28:05+00:00): What's the reason for removing the ref from this road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26763787
Nathan_A_RF (2019-08-25 19:30:48+00:00): Not used in any way apart from councils tagging roads in their database
user_5359 (2019-08-24 19:20:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358800363? The same peak but with a realistic height of 2362 meter not 8000 of your node.
For a better description of the other node please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:type.
IgnoredAmbience (2020-11-17 19:19:35+00:00): ETCS L2 is not yet commissioned for use outside of the Heathrow Airport tunnels, nor is it planned for installation beyond Reading.
JJJWegdam (2020-11-18 18:31:27+00:00): I simply based this on a European map. Local knowledge is always better. Do I understand correctly that there is no ETCS built/planned between Reading and Bristol?
IgnoredAmbience (2020-11-18 20:21:21+00:00): Unsure about the planned ETCS policy. Certainly none built at present. I'll find better sources for what is present and make some changes myself. I have contacts working in the Reading signalling design office.
JJJWegdam (2020-11-18 21:22:34+00:00): That’s great. Cheers
archie (2019-08-24 20:30:08+00:00): amenity=nightclub är måhända inte det bästa alternativet på det här stället. Jag bytte till amenity=events_venue.
archie (2019-08-24 20:46:20+00:00): Förresten här finns - dessvärre odokumenterade - alternativ: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmusic_venue. Det skulle vara intressant att veta mera om leisure=events_venue.
Hestben (2019-08-25 14:23:52+00:00): Bra kommentar, archie. Funderade också på om det fanns något bättre alternativ än night club. Viktigast att den kan hittas på kartan iaf.
freebeer (2019-08-31 16:31:20+00:00): mojn,

can you elaborate on the reason behind the deletions visualised by https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=73703443 ?

i fail to understand why a dense urban environment necessitates losing detailed mapping that describes how one accurately reaches from point a to point b.

grazie
user_385682 (2019-08-31 17:25:23+00:00): Too much detail makes a map as difficult to read as too little detail.  In this case a sidewalk alongside any residential, secondary or primary road in NYC would be assumed.   You would just follow the street to walk from point A to B.  Adding a sidewalk doesn't add any new information and reduces legibility somewhat.

A sidewalk should be used where ever it deviates from the road because it adds information.  For example sidewalks running though parks or even desire lines that cut across an empty lot do add information and would change how a person would walk from A to B.

In a rural setting indicating a sidewalk would be very useful locating a safe route for walkers, bikers etc. where it would not be expected.

Of course this is not a hard-and-fast rule and from someone else's suggestion I did add back a sidewalk because it deviated from the road to lead to a subway station.
JessAk71 (2019-08-31 00:08:08+00:00): Hi tylerchill, looks like the sidewalks (footways) you removed here now make the subway connections here un-routable for pedestrian routing to and from the subways. Do you think it would be best to keep any paths that actually connect point to point features for pedestrian routing purposes?
user_385682 (2019-08-31 12:23:25+00:00): There actually isn't a route on this short block.  45th Road is blocked by the elevator and escalator infrastructure added when they rebuilt the stations.  Google street view actually shows the before and after depending which view you use.  I'm adding elevator and subway entrance nodes which I hope make the rendering useful.
user_385682 (2019-08-31 12:27:48+00:00): nvm there is a narrow path - added.
Glassman (2019-08-24 21:44:44+00:00): My guess is this road should be classified as a track. It doesn't seem to service any houses. Also - roads out in the country are usually classified as a unclassified instead of residential. Residential is basically used inside of cities. (If you are wondering where this came from, well, OSM was started in England so we use their road classifications.) Unclassified doesn't mean we don't know, it just a British classification system we are stuck with :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73703734
Glassman (2019-08-24 21:56:17+00:00): The road up to the farm house looks like a driveway.

I changed this and the previous edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73703799
DavidKewley (2019-08-24 23:06:56+00:00): I'm reverting this change because it's incorrect. The driveway as previously drawn is accurate. The driveway you've drawn in this changeset is the old driveway, since removed. Check the Esri World and either Maxar imagery sets to see the newer driveway. I've driven both driveways, so I know which one is newer.
Fluffy89502 (2019-08-25 02:14:18+00:00): Alright thanks for letting me know.
Glassman (2019-08-24 22:07:59+00:00): I would have made this a track also - I don't believe the USFS has a road there anymore. It not in their system. I made the change
viloan (2019-08-24 20:17:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-08-24 20:21:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
dmlu (2019-08-26 15:42:45+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thank you for your contribution. The building polygon looks really good :)
Carto'Cité (2019-08-28 14:05:33+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour l'ajout de ces stations Vélib' : c'est très utile.
Une petite remarque : il ne convient pas d'ajouter le numéro de la station dans le tag name, ce numéro doit seulement être indiqué dans le tag ref. Je fais les corrections nécessaires.
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
skquinn (2020-07-29 18:10:45+00:00): Please note that in the opening_hours tag, descriptive phrases such as "by appointment" need to be in double quotes.
m86 (2020-07-29 18:11:55+00:00): Noted.
user_5359 (2019-08-25 04:45:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your object please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:attraction and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roller_coaster
Pieter Vander Vennet (2023-04-10 21:13:20+00:00): Hallo Leo,

Je gaf hier de naam 'Zwembad', maar dit lijkt me eerder een beschrijving. Is dit effectief de naam van het zwembad? Zoniet, dan mag de naam er volgens mij af.

Mvg,
Pieter
Leo Slager (2023-04-10 22:13:01+00:00): Tja, de dubbele omtrek van het gebouw verwijderd en alle tags daarvan overgenomen op de adres-node.
Na 3 jaar ervaring denk je dan: het zou ook anders kunnen.
Maar je hebt gelijk de naam kan eraf.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2023-04-10 22:40:36+00:00): Geen probleem hoor, al doende leert men ;)
dieterdreist (2019-09-12 13:29:46+00:00): Hi Janjko, I have noticed that you remove name tags from highway objects when there is a place=square object around, please do not do this. There is no inheritance from outer way tags to the relation, and while in theory it would be possible to inherit from place objects, for the current state it basically breaks the stuff of a lot of people.
dieterdreist (2019-09-12 13:32:37+00:00): sorry for the noise, I take this back, as  the highways (linear) still have their names it is probably not much damage (it could be an issue for pedestrian navigation if they route around the corners and there will be no name).
Janjko (2019-09-14 08:03:35+00:00): I remember never removing the way names, but I might have removed the pedestrian area one. You're right, those might be used as ways in the future.
alphensebezorger (2019-08-27 15:07:39+00:00): Hallo noelbov,

Voor zover ik weet, staat Google het gebruik van hun foto’s om OpenStreetMap te verbeteren niet toe. Zie bijvoorbeeld https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/63225/using-google-maps-street-view-and-satellite-to-see-streets-and-house-numbers.
Vriendelijke groeten, alphensebezorger.
noelbov (2019-08-27 20:50:30+00:00): Hoi alphensebezorger,
Welbedankt om mij dit te melden. Ik was er mij niet van bewust dat dit illegaal was.
Vriendelijke groet,
noelbov
bxl-forever (2020-07-06 08:40:16+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for this.
Do you know who is the operator for this recycling box?  Is this managed by Schaerbeek municipality, by a local ngo, or by an unnamed group of citizens?
This is to fix the operator tag because I think there is a duplicate here ("de Compost de Meux" is probably only the name of the box, not the name of the organization behind it).
freebeer (2019-08-29 22:06:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73899995 where the changeset comment is: delete still another random map scribble
freebeer (2019-08-29 22:03:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73899942 where the changeset comment is: delete a random map scribble
Peilscheibe (2019-08-27 09:48:49+00:00): Hallo wikimouse,

Du hast in den Changesets 73699277, 73697481, 73697408, 73697351, 73697315, 73705360, 73705344, 73705327, 73705310 und 73705446
sachlich richtig erfaßte Richtungsangaben von Verkehrsschildern durch falsche Werte ersetzt. Mit dem tag direction=* wird die Richtung beschrieben, in die ein Objekt zeigt, siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction
Ich habe die Änderungen daher zurückgesetzt.
Grüße, P.
eggie (2019-08-25 11:03:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-25 11:07:22+00:00): Beste mpisters.. Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. Dus niet op het gebouw nog een keer een adres aanmaken. . De gebouw naam is niet de naam van de sportclub.
Verder hoort erbij
club=sport
sport=soccer
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-25 11:09:20+00:00): Info naar adresnode verplaatst
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-31 19:36:17+00:00): node 6743081552 is real?
Lola Fox (2021-11-01 13:31:15+00:00): Non lo trovo. Hai un link?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-11-01 20:08:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6743081552
Lola Fox (2021-11-02 19:54:14+00:00): Era un attraversamento strada/ferrovia abbandonata che chi ha cancellato il vecchio raccordo ferroviario che avevo fatto, si è dimenticato di cancellare. Credo che quel raccordo doveva essere lasciato poichè ci sono tante altre ferrovie tracciate come abbandonate e non più esistenti nemmeno con le sedi ferroviarie.
Hjart (2019-08-25 07:29:07+00:00): Er du sikker på at hele denne multipolygon hører med til museet?
archie (2019-08-26 17:49:31+00:00): Nej, det er jeg ikke. Jeg endrede kun navnet, der var felstavet og lade till wikipedia-linken. Ellers gjorde jeg ingen endring.
Alex Shcherbatii (2019-08-24 23:46:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73706982 where the changeset comment is:
Branko Kokanovic (2019-08-25 14:12:08+00:00): Zdravo,
Vidim da dodajes name:sr i name:sr-Latn i da to radis preko Sophox-a. Jel koristis ovaj moj alat:
https://gitlab.com/stalker314314/serbian-osm-lint
ili imas svoje neke skripte?

Ako koristis ovaj alat, da znas da ja aktivno radim na tom alatu, pokusavam da zamenim Sophox sa Overpass-om, a u isto vreme da olaksam kriterijume kada treba da se dodaju name:sr i name:sr-Latn. Iskreno da ti kazem - vise nisam siguran da li zelimo da dodajemo ova dva taga svuda. Ima oko 10.000 highway/places/natural koji nemaju name:sr u Srbiji, a ako ih dodamo - pravimo problema svima koji hoce da ih izmene, posto ljudi uglavnom izmene samo name (ili pravimo probleme sami sebi posto su onda name i name:sr razliciti, pa mi treba da peglamo). Voleo bih kada bismo seli i napravili neki dogovor kada name:sr treba da postoji (uvek, samo kad je razlicito od name...), mozda na forumu. Sta ti mislis?
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-07-28 22:21:02+00:00): stradela aceasta se numește anume ”Stradela 2 Pietrăriei” și nu ”Stradela 2 Pietrăriei”.
abakus_uploader (2019-08-25 22:30:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2019-08-24 23:14:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jmapb (2019-08-31 21:36:32+00:00): Howdy AV... is this place just closed (ie, it might reopen as something else) or actually gone (ie,the building's been reconfigured without this storefront, or replaced with a new building altogether?)
Artemisia Vulgaris (2019-08-31 23:53:13+00:00): The venue is definitely closed but I can't tell if the indoor/storefront entrances have been reconfigured. When I walked by it I think it was covered with boarding. Why?
jmapb (2019-09-01 16:52:33+00:00): If the building will still be using that address (1487 Broadway) it's better keep the node there and just remove the tags specific for the cafe. Otherwise we lose the fact that this address is associated with this building.

(This issue usually only comes up for corner buildings with an address on two streets, or for large muti-address buildings. Most others have address tags directly on the building itself.)

Anyway I've resurrected this node and left just the base address tags from the original building import, all good.

Happy mapping. j
Artemisia Vulgaris (2019-09-02 04:28:15+00:00): Ah, okay. Good to know, thanks for the tip. :)
Leo Slager (2019-08-25 10:11:59+00:00): Hallo Roy,
Het toevoegen van een eiland vereist wat diepgaande kennis over hoe dat in OSM moet worden neergezet.
Dat kan namelijk alleen in een multipolygoon. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples

ik kijk even of ik dat kan corrigeren
Leo Slager (2019-08-25 10:16:03+00:00): Ik zie dat je de mp al aangemaakt hebt.
Interessant is dan waarom het net rendert op de kaart.
Zijn alle tags van de outer verwijderd ?
Roy Smeding (2019-08-25 11:29:29+00:00): Ik dacht dat ik het hetzelfde had gedaan als een ander multipolygon dat wel juist renderde (eilandje in de vijver bij het Gruenepad), maar hier was ik zo te zien vergeten de natural=water tag van de outer weg te halen. Heb het opgelost, en nu lijkt het wel goed te renderen.
Leo Slager (2019-08-25 12:52:47+00:00): prima
TravGW (2019-09-06 02:28:51+00:00): Do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated.
TravGW (2019-09-06 02:29:43+00:00): Do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated.
btwhite92 (2019-08-25 04:42:58+00:00): Reverting for reasons explained on previous edits - direct access to properties means this is not a motorway.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 01:47:14+00:00): Why did you delete the Hudson Strait?
 
restored and repaired
 
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
Supaplex (2019-08-25 04:23:27+00:00): 其實有了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2703829508
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73707622
Supaplex (2019-08-25 04:22:03+00:00): 其實正式名稱是連江縣，然後是台灣控制的，馬祖縣還不是台面上名字。要不要併到連江縣的node，加為alt_name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73707648
yellowsoar (2019-08-25 06:27:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:alt_name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73707648
InfosReseaux (2019-12-15 18:55:38+00:00): Bonjour et merci de l'ajout des deux postes

Le nom "EDF Nucléaire" est bien celui qui est visible sur le terrain ?
C'est surprenant, mais peut-etre en référence à l'activité des riverains? on dirait une cité EDF
fgouget (2019-12-16 11:01:19+00:00): Oui. C'est le nom sur la plaque gris clair sur cette photo (mais pas lisible à cette distance) :
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/1X9COev-aU16zQTc3RZpLw

Évidemment sur la plaque c'est tout en majuscule mais sinon ça devrait correspondre, y compris pour les points et les tirets.

Par contre cela devrait peut-être plutôt être dans le champ name. Je ne sais jamais trop parce que le Wiki décrit un format pour le champ ref que je n'ai vu qu'une fois sur le terrain (à Granville).

Pour ce qui est du lotissement je ne sais pas s'il s'agit d'une cité EDF. A ma connaissance il n'y a pas d'activité EDF à proximité.
InfosReseaux (2019-12-17 21:45:09+00:00): Merci pour le retour

En effet cela est plus approprié dans le champ name
Les postes Enedis ont également un code national à indiquer dans ref:ERDF:gdo (bientôt ref:FR:gdo) si des éléments sont visibles sur le terrain pour cela

C'est un nom bizarre pour un lotissement non EDF, mais soit si c'est ce qui est lisible sur le terrain

François
dpolovinkin (2023-07-27 20:39:36+00:00): Антон добрый вечер!
Хотел узнать как делается лучше - а почему в этом месте просто не сделаны 4 ряда деревьев линиями вместо кучи отдельных? Ведь это по идее ряды? :)
Anton Khorev (2023-07-30 15:12:43+00:00): С рядами иногда решения приходится принимать. Например, в этом месте
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=59.98364&mlon=30.20140#map=19/59.98364/30.20140  
можно увидеть ряды по окружности, как сейчас нарисовано, а можно было бы и по радиусу, перпендикулярно тому, что нарисовано.

А в этом пакете я не помню, почему я деревья отдельно рисовал. Возможно, чтобы рисовать что-либо ещё относительно деревьев, например, скамейки. В этом месте я, видимо, так не делал, скамейки я обозначил ещё до деревьев. Но например, в Летнем саду я так делал:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=59.94464&mlon=30.33575#map=19/59.94464/30.33575
dpolovinkin (2023-08-07 08:28:59+00:00): ага, понял.. спасибо за ответ! :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-25 09:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73712820 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake data in New Zealand. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3034 , 3037 and 3122.