piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fiks_007 (2020-12-09 10:11:22+00:00): Это не ошибка, а действительно пешеходное место. Почему через плотину нельзя ходить? Там не брезгуют на квадроциклах проезжать.
_PG_ (2020-12-11 11:50:52+00:00): Дело в том, что вы по ошибке замапили не тропинку, а размеченный туристический маршрут для хайкинга.
Fiks_007 (2020-12-23 08:24:34+00:00): Могли бы Вы выражаться, понятными русскими словами (мапинг, хайтинг)? Вдаватьс в подробности их значений, мне не интересно. То место, что я отметил, нет никаких разметок. На картах виден сплошной водоем без плотны. Если вас не устраивает мой вариант, иправьте должным образом. Сравните с Yandex и Google картами.
Something B (2020-12-23 14:04:20+00:00): Однако, туристический маршрут через плотину не проходит? Или проходит?
Fiks_007 (2020-12-25 07:37:54+00:00): Про туристический маршрут, понятия не имею. Откуда ему там взяться и где Вы взяли такую информацию (здесь обычные дачные участки)? Там простая пешеходная зона через плотину.
Something B (2020-12-25 09:35:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11815794/history
Вы отметили маршрут для пешеходного туризма.
Anil Basnet (2021-05-31 10:27:27+00:00): Hi there! You have created a lot of circular buildings in this changeset but when I checked on the imageries they don't actually exist. Sometimes there are circular hay stack not buildings. Be alert while mapping in such areas of Nepal.
eggie (2020-11-01 09:55:03+00:00): Dag senorPepe
One feature one element.. Dus niet shop=...en  amenity=....
Een dilemma dus. :)
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93329515
Wanneer het echt een bakker betreft zou ik het als bakkerij taggen. 
Hier heb ik het met twee vermeldingen opgelost.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.18308/6.13548

Een echte oplossing heb ik ook niet.
MVG
eggie
senorPepe (2020-11-01 15:06:27+00:00): Hi eggie,

Ik zie Ambachtelijke bakkerij Bril, wat bedoelt u met twee vermeldingen?

Zou dit een oplossing zijn? https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/26625/buildings-with-more-than-one-amenity
De restaurant/bakkerij heeft in het gebouw 2 losse toonbanken, een voor zelfgebakken brood en bier, en de andere voor maaltijden met eigen keuken. Zelfde bedrijf. 

Wederom bedankt.
Gr senorPepe
senorPepe (2020-11-01 15:11:01+00:00): Of nummer 1) van deze oplossing
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9557#p110247.

Dan zou ik de point in een area moeten veranderen en er  twee andere area binnenin zetten voor de twee onderdelen
eggie (2020-11-01 15:48:24+00:00): Het blijft schipperen soms..  
Het rendert nu als restaurant.
Up to you.. 
Gr eggie
Miguel Pedr (2020-11-01 17:55:27+00:00): Hola,
Dar directins en el mismo lado afecta la ruta aquí y también las carreteras permiten que el tráfico esté en un lado que afecta la ruta. Tenga cuidado al asignar los unidireccionales, asignando unidireccionales incorrectos que conducirán al impacto de la ruta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93329560
GunnisonBlackCanyon (2020-11-03 18:25:14+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thanks for commenting, I responded on this changeset since it is the same issue in both: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93332757
frosm (2020-11-05 09:19:35+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
dans osm, le nom représente le nom réel tel que par exemple Gare Montparnasse et non pas une description.
il existe un attribut description si vous le souhaitez (mais en même temps, les attributs décrivent déjà le fait que c'est une aire de jeux pour enfants).
bonne continuation
frosm (2020-11-05 09:20:30+00:00): par ailleurs, n'hésitez pas à décrire l'invention de vos modifs : par ex : maj suite aux travaux de démolition de la statue et à la pleine de jeux
Frans S (2020-11-06 10:59:33+00:00): See my PM to you about mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93331876
Max-Kritic (2020-11-03 16:27:40+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=1.71781&lat=50.92733&zoom=13&opacity=0.39

Voir l'erreur de multipolygone https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11815938
Max-Kritic (2020-11-03 16:28:38+00:00): Deuxième erreur 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=1.88299&lat=50.90869&zoom=15&opacity=0.39
Max-Kritic (2020-11-26 09:55:01+00:00): Pas de rectification ?
Danalieth73 (2020-11-26 10:18:27+00:00): Je vais corriger, je m'étais focalisé sur les erreurs que j'ai faites en 4 ans de cartographie, passant de 1121 erreurs sur Osmose à un peu plus de 500,je n'ai pas encore attaqué ce type d'erreur
Miguel Pedr (2020-11-01 17:53:54+00:00): Hola,
Aquí las direcciones dadas son incorrectas y también dar direcciones incorrectas afectará la ruta o navegación. Tenga cuidado al asignar los unidireccionales, asignando un sentido incorrecto que provocará el impacto de la ruta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93332757
GunnisonBlackCanyon (2020-11-03 18:23:26+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for catching this and correcting the oneway directions!
Frans S (2020-11-06 11:08:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
See my PM about your mapping skills.
Best regards
frosm (2020-11-05 10:05:51+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
merci pour vos contributions :)
Frans S (2020-11-03 15:46:29+00:00): Hello Thanks for mapping here
Please be more accurate in your mappings
you mapped a few hughe building rather oversized 
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping
keilingha (2020-11-09 11:28:41+00:00): This changes makes numerous hiking apps stop working. This made a disaster to hiking teams in Hong Kong as they could not see all distance post from the app or even online OSM map and caused danger to them. Would you please revert such change?
Please delete the name from the information node to let it as before.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-11 13:46:12+00:00): Handled in message
nevw (2020-11-02 10:46:08+00:00): Hi
all you edits are tagged as preferred now.
Cheers
Frans S (2020-10-31 11:38:37+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not fully comply with that criteria. The mappings are rather accurate but lacks the squaring .
So the majority of the rectangular buildings needed to be squared.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mappings
pfiers (2021-01-19 16:58:24+00:00): Misschien mis ik hier iets maar voor zover ik weet is https://osm.org/way/865621631 wel degelijk deel van het Sport Vlaanderen Domein.
Jakka (2021-01-19 17:15:26+00:00): als je dit bekijkt zit er wel degelijk in het gebied ;)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11816220#map=17/50.98097/4.50983
pfiers (2021-01-19 17:20:18+00:00): Nee toch? Het is een inner way van de multipolygon. Is dit een of andere truck voor OpenStreetMap Carto?
Jakka (2021-01-19 17:28:17+00:00): Nu kan ik niet meer volgen, zie hier staan als outer en inner ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11816220#map=15/50.9866/4.5116
pfiers (2021-01-19 17:29:49+00:00): Ja, maar die parking zou toch geen inner mogen zijn? De parking is deel van het domein.
Jakka (2021-01-19 17:55:51+00:00): de grens van domein loopt volledig buiten om dus outer en parking ligt volledig binnen die buiten grens. Dus in relatie vorm is dat OK Tenzij ik mij compleet vergis....
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Relation:multipolygon
pfiers (2021-01-19 19:00:36+00:00): Ja, met de relatie is er op technisch vlak inderdaad niets mis. Ik bedoel dat het volgens mij semantisch niet klopt dat de parking een soort "gat" is binnen het domein.

Als ik op de parking sta en iemand vraagt me "zijn we in het Sport Vlaanderen Domein?", dan zeg ik ja, ook al staan we niet in het bos of op het strand.
Frans S (2020-11-06 11:15:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
See my PM about your mapping skills.
Buildings not squared and placed on their groundplan
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-11-06 11:24:25+00:00): Hello.
See my PM about how to map tall buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93334115
eggie (2020-10-31 14:31:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review
Je bedoeling is vast goed, maar 
de melktap heb je vastgemaakt aan de landuse grass.

Kijk eens naar deze wiki hoe je een melktap zou kunnen taggen. 
Wat is Boerenkaas.. Ook een fending_machine?





MVG,
Eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2020-10-31 13:06:24+00:00): Ciao Stefano. Non aggiungere i numeri civici agli edifici. In Italia, i numeri civici sono associati agli ingressi. Posiziona quindi un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso ove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Inoltre, i civici che hanno l'esponente (ovvero la parte letterale dopo il numero) devo essere inseriti in minuscolo senza separatori (quindi niente  /). Ciao, Andrea
brk57 (2020-11-26 10:44:35+00:00): Ciao Andrea. Scusami il ritardo nel darti feedback. Ho (...almeno credo di aver...) sistemato quel gruppo di numeri, già il giorno dopo il tuo commento. Ne terrò conto da ora in poi. Ciao. Grazie
eggie (2020-10-31 14:36:55+00:00): Uiteraard goed bedoeld, maar een name=  doet helemaal niets in OSM.
Kijk eens hier op het forum van OSM.
Het kan op verschillende manieren.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=25085
MVG,
eggie
pio2_122 (2020-10-31 12:26:03+00:00): Jakie jest źródło takich zmian?
Zmiany tego typu (opis pt. "." + brak źródła) kwalifikują się do natychmiastowego wycofania jako wandalizm.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93334564
fkv (2020-12-03 07:30:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 95203481 where the changeset comment is: CS 93334782 revertiert wegen falscher Namensloeschungen (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121225074/history)
ndm (2020-10-31 19:35:52+00:00): This will be reverted -- it was surveyed carefully on foot --  there are several sections that aren't navigable by normal buses
user_5359 (2020-11-02 05:50:20+00:00): Hello! Please check the way http://www.osm.org/way/865633159. You use the key hmax: Did you mean the key maxheight?
pittrichimica (2020-11-07 15:52:47+00:00): Yes, that's a problem which arises if you have a physics dossier open on another screen with formulae ;-)
Thanks mueschel for correcting.
OSMPossum (2020-11-02 21:02:57+00:00): Hello Literan, I saw this turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7645006 was added. Are you aware of this recent imagery which confirms traffic may continue straight? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.770943331320126&lng=37.51726031021235&z=15.502621582061302&dateFrom=2020-11-01&pKey=xo8Lk5zgrOKPcemvssoNPw&focus=photo
literan (2020-11-02 21:14:57+00:00): OSMPossum excuse me, it was my mistake. I will fix it now
frosm (2020-11-07 00:01:41+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
Merci pour vos contributions.
pour les objets détruits, il y a 2 façons de les renseigner :
- soit en supprimant l'objet (avec le défaut qu'un contributeur pourrait le rajouter à nouveau avec une imagerie satellite montrant la situation précédente)
- en préfixant les attributs avec was:
c'est ce que j'ai fait sur ceux-ci.
n'hésitez pas à regarder :)
Bonne continuation.
Himké (2020-11-05 18:11:22+00:00): Marketway Lane is another road
Dartmouthmapmaker (2020-11-05 19:11:41+00:00): This is from HRM and is official It on the HRM open data under street centre lines
ansuta (2020-10-31 19:55:25+00:00): Hola,
Mira este enlace que te indica la cantidad de población de cada place. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Generic:Map_Features:place
Saludos
nevw (2020-10-31 23:42:29+00:00): Hi
I reverted this changeset due to the duplicated waterway
Hugoren Martinako (2023-10-02 12:36:16+00:00): Boltaña es cabeza de partido judicial, por lo que es capital=7 y place=town

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas/town#Cabezas_de_partido_judicial
VicBlas (2020-10-31 13:43:11+00:00): #MapatonCiudadesSustentables
VicBlas (2020-10-31 13:45:07+00:00): #MapatonRedCiudadesSustentables
SHARCRASH (2020-10-31 13:20:31+00:00): + tags corrected
Frans S (2020-11-02 14:17:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Rather good and precise mapped.
Just 1 remark.
High buildings need to be mapped in a different way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground.(groundplan).
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing
success with mapping
stephankn (2020-11-01 14:55:39+00:00): Please check maps.me presets and their meaning in OpenStreetMap (reference in wiki). For example, you added a "wilderness_hut" node 8068823789 and tagged it "cottage in rice farm". As a cottage is a small house where people typically live, this looks wrong. I checked different sources of aerial imagery and can not see larger buildings at the specified location. Could it be that you wanted to tag weather shelters? Like a sala used by farmers? You tagged various objects in a similar fashion.
AlaskaDave (2020-12-26 12:18:41+00:00): @stephankn
This person does not respond to questions about his mapping. I've been deleting these "wilderness_huts" as I encounter them.
kreuzschnabel (2020-12-17 17:51:48+00:00): Hi kirmonkey, your alterations caused some dead ends on the C2C and Herriot routes (see https://osm.org/relation/7336320 and https://osm.org/relation/11229078). Please keep an eye on route relations when extending existing ways – in doubt better add new ones :)
kirmonkey (2020-12-18 09:26:51+00:00): Hi kreuzschnabel. 

Thanks for highlighting this. There certainly was no intention to break the routes!  I'll make sure to scroll down to the relations before confirming updates in the future.

All the best.
Richard.
kreuzschnabel (2020-12-18 09:38:24+00:00): Thanks for understanding :) I know this was an accident because you weren’t aware of this issue.
 
Normally, all is well without further interaction as long as you 1. don’t extend existing ways that belong to a route relation but add new ones for continuation, and 2. don’t delete such ways to replace them by fresh ones but edit the existing ones, if changes have to be made.
kirmonkey (2020-12-18 09:43:11+00:00): Understood. I'm thinking I deleted a way and re-put it back in - not my normal approach. It must have been some serious disentangling I thought I was doing.

Have a good weekend.

Richard.
literan (2020-11-01 16:21:04+00:00): Жебрунова надо было разбить в точке примыкания, и включить в отношение ту часть, куда ведет знак. И еще лишнюю точку в отношение включили. В общем, переделал все
nevw (2020-10-31 23:43:32+00:00): Hi
I deleted one of the duplicated ways defining the swimming pool.
VicBlas (2020-10-31 13:43:56+00:00): #MapatonCiudadesSustentables
andergrin (2020-11-01 07:39:20+00:00): Контури будівель треба вирівнювати, це можна зробити виділивши контур і натиснути Q
stephankn (2020-11-01 14:48:29+00:00): I have seen you adding a lot of valuable content  to OpenStreetMap over the years. Great! Have you considered using a more professional editor than maps.me? Some of your edits suffer from inconsistencies very likely introduced by the editor you are using. Here for example I am quite certain you added a buddhist temple. But the "religion=buddhist" tag is missing. An editor like JOSM would have warned you (or added the tag right from the beginning by using presets). I heard of other mobile editors as well. Maybe they are worth a try? Like vespucci or streetcomplete? You are very welcome to the forum at forum.openstreetmap.org to get in touch with other mappers.
nevw (2020-10-31 23:46:32+00:00): Hi
I deleted the duplicated water storage tank
kucai (2022-06-19 13:54:57+00:00): Where does the full ramp name come from?
Kovoschiz (2020-10-31 14:49:15+00:00): Dragged node, irrelevant content
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93338764
user_5359 (2020-11-02 20:46:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add the tag "Hatfield Digital Twin City"="Hatfield Digital Twin City" to same buildings (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ZEl). What is the meaning of this combination?
nevw (2020-10-31 23:50:54+00:00): Hi
I merged the separate tags and geometry for the water tanks
nevw (2020-10-31 23:57:05+00:00): Hi
I merged tags and geometry for two of these tanks
Minh Nguyen (2020-11-08 19:27:47+00:00): If I’m interpreting the changeset tags correctly, you’re citing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:PermanentLink/2045889#Multiple_names as justification for listing only one name in name=* (the Spanish name). But that page doesn’t preclude the inclusion of multiple names in name=* in exceptional cases. Did you have another page in mind?

Here, the Spanish and English names roughly in the same ballpark in terms of international geographic relevance, even if the Spanish name is slightly more prominent in terms of coastline. Other North American bodies of water that straddle official linguistic boundaries, like the Gulf of Saint Lawrence or the Bering Strait, are still tagged with multiple names.

There’s also this lengthy thread about (among other things) the prospect of applying multiple names to name=* on international bodies of water: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2020-January/thread.html#83774 . It doesn’t seem to have arrived at a consensus, but it does highlight that the issue isn’t cut and dry.
geri-oc (2020-11-01 19:09:19+00:00): Warum access=yes?  Es bedeutet es kann alles - z.B. auch Panzer und Busse - benutzen:
Gruß Gerd
keepright! ler (2025-02-27 14:31:16+00:00): Ich war heute (27. Februar) hier und konnte an der Seite der Zufahrtsstraße keinen Parkplatz auffinden – da sind nur Baumstämme.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4643999
PLima785 (2020-11-04 10:32:08+00:00): Boas qual é essa aplicação?
não se viste mas existe um estacionamento com condições especiais na Avenida Altino Coelho
Dannyps (2020-11-04 21:01:13+00:00): É esta: https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes/

Que tem a Altino Coelho?
PLima785 (2020-11-04 22:59:03+00:00): novos parques de estacionamento em espinha mas só se pode estacionar de traseira
Dannyps (2020-11-05 13:55:14+00:00): ah, sim, na Rua Altino Coelho :)
Eu reparei. Acho que n temos como mapear isso :(
geri-oc (2020-11-01 18:53:31+00:00): Bitte bei der APP beachten, das Hausnummern auch an Eingängen liegen können - wie in diesem Beispiel.
Gruß Gerd
zuicz (2020-10-31 15:23:35+00:00): po co tu secondary, skoro obok jest Trasa N-S?
Frans S (2020-11-05 12:51:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping
LySioS (2021-03-15 22:04:17+00:00): Bonjour Patrick,
Je fais suite à ta demande de vérification. Je vois que tu as créé le café du commerce sur 2 bâtiments. Ça veut dire que ça crée 2 bars identique. Le plus simple pour rajouter un commerce est de simplement placer 1 point sur le bâtiment (ou centré s'il s'étale sur plusieurs bâti) et de décrire ce qu'il faut sur ce point là.
Ensuite, une majuscule en début de mot suffit. Seuls les petits mots restent en minuscule. Ce sont les normes sur osm.
A+
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93341247
nevw (2020-11-01 00:07:55+00:00): Hi
I reverted this change as it duplicated was was correctly mapped there already
Mar4s (2021-04-11 15:45:49+00:00): Ahoj, koukám se, že jsi označil chatovou oblast jako "zahrady" s názvem "chaty". Mám k tomu dvě připomínky:
1) Pole "název" (tag name) se správně používá pouze pro opravdové názvy, a ne obecná označení. Název"chaty" bych tedy smazal.

2) Označení "zahrada" se pro chatové oblasti nepoužívá. Momentálně je nejčastější tag "landuse=allotments", který značí zahrádkářské kolonie. Nikdo s tím není spokojený, ale bohužel lepší tag momentálně neexistuje. V rámci této oblasti se pak jednotlivé "parcely" dají značit 
leisure=garden
access=private
garden:type=residential

Měj se,
Michal
Pontiac_CZ (2021-04-11 20:30:20+00:00): Ahoj,
ad 1) ano, jméno se má používat pro oficiální název, který je znám nebo se ve formě nápisu na místě vyskytuje. Tohle není správně, chtěl jsem tím pro čtenáře popsat, cože ta plocha s s mnoha drobnými objekty vlastně představuje. Asi mě inspirovalo "ch.", které používaji mapy.cz. Ale souhlas, není to správně a nemám problém, když to opravíš.

ad 2) u allotments už mám názor jiný, tento tag znám, otagoval jsem tak už několik zahrádkářských osad. Tady na Kozí Horce jsme před lety byli na táboře a co jsem si vzpomínal, tak víc než zahrádky na zeleninu mi to tam připomínalo zahrady a objekty na rekreaci, občas s bazény, ohništi, případně s nějakými ovocnými stromy. Přišlo mi to v souladu s popisem leisure = garden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=garden?uselang=en) - jak s úvodním odstavcem, tak s druhým, zvlášť s odrážkami "Relaxation" nebo "Growing useful produce".

Naproti tomu allotments (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments) jsou podle popisu hned v prvních dvou odstavcích to, co známe jako zahrádkářské osady - jednotlivé zahrádky jsou přiděleny (assigned) jednotlivcům nebo rodinám, velikost obvykle dostačuje potřebám rodiny, často se tam vyskytuje šopa pro nářadí a někdy i chata pro víkendový pobyt. Zahrádkáři jsou v asociaci, která si pronajímá  zahrádky od majitele té oblasti. Zakončuje to věta "it is only used for gardening (i.e. growing vegetables, fruits and flowers), but not for permanent residential purposes".

Tady na Kozí Horce mi přišlo, že tam někteří i bydlí. A hlavně, že každý svůj pozemek vlastní a od nikoho nepronajímá.

No nicméně pokud to tam lépe znáš a jsou to opravdu spíš allotments, nemám taktéž žádný problém, když to zkoriguješ.

Ať se daří a díky za práci věnovanou OSM! :-)

Pavel
Mar4s (2021-04-12 06:45:47+00:00): Ahoj,

Já chtěl upozornit spíše na ten obecný název "chaty", ten v pořádku určitě není. Tagování je v tomto případě nejednoznačné, tak ho měnit nebudu :-)
Pontiac_CZ (2021-04-12 09:24:10+00:00): Ano, klidně to smaž. Možná to tam má nějaký oficiální či místně známý název, např. "Chatová oblast Kozí Horka", někdy to tak bývá. Nicméně  z doby tábora na turistické základně si už místní názvy nepamatuju, tak jsem to pojmenoval jen "chaty". Ideální by na to byl nějaký tag pro označení, který by se renderoval, pokud by nebylo zadáno jméno...  O takovém ale nevím a tak jsem trochu zneužil tag "name", to se přiznávám. Souhlasím, že to tam nepatří.

Hezký den
Pavel