piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nmombo12 (2021-12-16 18:34:25+00:00): Hello fattmat58, would you please share the reasoning for the cartpath zig-zag of way 1010094190 near the clubhouse? From available aerial imagery I can't identify a winding path.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682637
fattmat58 (2021-12-16 18:53:32+00:00): When uploading the map data to create the golf course it will combine the area as a large cart path area.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682637
nmombo12 (2021-12-16 19:02:34+00:00): I assume you are discussing TGC-Designer-Tools to create a golf course in PGA Tour 2K. In this case, it is not accepted to intentionally map features that do not exist in the real world for this purpose. It is just like "mapping for the renderer", in this case the renderer is TGC-Designer-Tools utility. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114682637
axelr (2021-12-09 16:58:09+00:00): Sind beide Haltepunkte auf die andere Seite (westlich) der Kreuzung verlegt worden ?
Yannik leon (2021-12-10 01:27:13+00:00): Die SWK-Straßenbahnhaltestelle „Schicks“ wird in Richtung Westen verlegt. Das bestätigt Stadtwerke-Sprecher Dirk Höstermann.
axelr (2022-02-16 17:47:05+00:00): Wir verlegen die Haltestelle in den Routen erst, wenn sie verlegt ist. Nicht wenn sie eines Tages verlegt werden soll. Deshalb nochmals die Frage: Sind beide Haltepunkte verlegt worden ?
Yannik leon (2022-02-16 18:38:35+00:00): JA  die sind verlegt worden an der alten stelle also wo die voher waren ist jetzt grünstreifen
jleedev (2021-12-11 21:26:42+00:00): What is "GAP Temp" supposed to be?
stevea (2021-12-11 22:12:58+00:00): Whoops, thank you for catching this error of mine!  It was a "holding container" for the Great Allegheny Passage trail portion in Pennsylvania.  But I made an error with this and you caught it.

I have corrected this by deleting the relation as some leftover elements during the creation and development of the route.  Again, thank you for bringing this to my attention.
ivanbranco (2021-12-19 09:06:41+00:00): Hi Han,

what's the meaning of this tag? sinokG=123
Kovoschiz (2022-01-21 07:23:18+00:00): You broke the track while doing this.
nvarner (2021-12-11 04:43:56+00:00): It looks like there isn't really a zoo here. Can you change this to reflect what's in the area?
julcnx (2021-12-08 13:04:15+00:00): Invalid tag value, please kindly refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:divider
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114683642
Frans S (2022-01-15 10:26:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A request.
When mapping highways please try to connect them to other highways next to them.
Best regards
wkdgs (2021-12-09 09:38:46+00:00): Hi,

könntest du etwas aussagekräftigere Kommentare verwenden? So ist es schwierig nachzuvollziehen was gemappt werden sollte und woher die Informationen kommen.

Es reicht eine kurze Beschreibung dessen, was gemacht wurde und woher die Infos stammen. Im ID-Editor kann man beim Speichern der Änderungen das Feld "Quellen" hinzufügen und dort z.B. "survey" (für vor Ort erhobene Infos) oder "aerial imagery" (für Infos aus Luftbildaufnahmen) eintragen.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114684190
Frans S (2021-12-10 14:47:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114684442
Frans S (2021-12-10 15:00:34+00:00): Another issue
Please map more accurate. You often map a cluster of buildings and map it as 1 building (include clearings and yards as well.)
Check other imageries as well when you have doubts.
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114684442
pkoby (2021-12-08 21:32:57+00:00): I noticed in this changeset that you added some POIs. I checked some street-level imagery, and it looks like a lot of the buildings you added POIs in are not exclusively filled by those businesses. Notably, you changed the Dovecote Cafe from a node to the whole building. Many of these old rowhouses only have a business on the ground floor and apartments above. Unless I'm positive that the whole building is used as a business, I prefer to map POIs as points. Thoughts?
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2021-12-09 08:22:26+00:00): You're right about Dovecote, my mistake. I changed that one back. I have tried to make that distinction where possible (for example the Penn-North Subway location in this changeset) but I was hasty with that change. Let me know if there are any others that look incorrect
Frans S (2021-12-10 15:09:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
B: overlapping buildings drawn
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.

Would you be so kind to correct these issues? 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114685848
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2021-12-13 02:26:04+00:00): Hi Frans S,
Thanks for the review, 
I have already fixed the warning issues in this changeset. 
thank you
MarcoR (2021-12-08 06:57:45+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto/a!
In genere il valore unclassified si usa per strade urbane/extraurbane prevalentemente asfaltate (ma non è necessario). Nei boschi di solito si sceglie tra path e track, dove il primo è un sentiero generico ad uso promiscuo (ad es. pedoni, biciclette e cavalli) mentre il secondo è una strada spesso non asfaltata e sconnessa ad uso forestale/agricolo. In pratica, se vi sono i solchi del passaggio di un trattore è track, negli altri casi path.

Per maggiori info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway

A presto,
Marco.
Frans S (2021-12-08 14:46:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key ( you did not square 13 out of 15 buildings)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114688300
NiLaKol (2021-12-31 06:36:53+00:00): Hi Tilia_J,
your CS deleted this service road in austria: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114674632 
Was that intended or an accident ?
Tilia_J (2021-12-31 10:37:45+00:00): This is by accident. During a certain timespan I got edit conflicts during upload of my changeset and downloaded the objects listed in the error message.

Afterwards I noticed that this caused edits all over the world (US, AT, DE)

Do you expect any restore action from my side?

Apologies for any inconvenience
NiLaKol (2022-01-08 10:34:09+00:00): Well, i don't know how to restore a single road from a changeset.
Tilia_J (2022-01-08 11:31:16+00:00): I just re-added the service road instead of restoring (revert) it:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115905708
nevw (2021-12-08 12:54:28+00:00): Hi
I adjusted and added more tags to your edit and mapped the building remotely by satellite imagery. Tomorrow I will map a few more of the nearby buildings. Can you check if the shop is located correctly in the building footprint.
Also the side street needs a name if you are able help with that.
XimeX (2021-12-08 10:57:22+00:00): Sollt das building=service nicht bleiben? Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dservice
Bernhard Pranz (2021-12-08 14:05:28+00:00): Stimmt, wurde von der App überschrieben - ist geändert!
XimeX (2021-12-08 21:39:48+00:00): Auch hier building=service?
Rakkka (2022-03-07 11:32:47+00:00): こんにちは。この交差点に右折・左折用？の斜めのウェイが追加されている手法ですが、ウィキのどこに記述があるか教えていただけますでしょうか。

以下のページには見当たりませんでした。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
rthik007 (2021-12-09 10:27:18+00:00): "Hi obri,
Fixed the dragged node 2523223707
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114736538.
Thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114689745
XimeX (2021-12-08 21:39:42+00:00): Auch hier building=service?
ToniE (2021-12-08 09:40:17+00:00): Kein Problem, zumal diese "Ortsbegehung" nicht so einfach ist wie "der Briefkasten um die Ecke"
XimeX (2021-12-08 21:39:37+00:00): Auch hier building=service?
Helium314 (2021-12-08 11:57:38+00:00): Du hast hier einen Billa eingetragen. Bist du sicher dass das korrekt ist? Hier ist nur sehr wenig Platz für einen Supermarkt, und auf der anderen Straßenseite gibt es auch schon einen Billa.
NewAtair (2021-12-08 12:04:47+00:00): Da ist egentlich kein Billa, aber in StreetComplete war dieser Knoten irgenwie mit dem Billa gegenüber verbunden bzw hat auf dort verwiesen (Bug in der App?) . Das Geschäft selbst gibt es nicht mehr, denn der Geier daneben hat sich vergrößert,
Helium314 (2021-12-08 12:33:18+00:00): Seltsam.... Wenn du irgendwie halbwegs nachvollziehen kannst was passiert ist wäre ein Bugreport in https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues hilfreich
user_14250389 (2021-12-08 08:10:57+00:00): 中國的這一縣城數據非常不完善，因為一個錯誤的ref而找到，沒想到是系統性的數據缺失。中國在地社群完全可以針對此類情況組織圖拉松來解決。
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-08 16:19:10+00:00): Ciao. Sei sicuro che questi edifici siano dei building=shed ("Una semplice struttura a un piano  utilizzata per lo stoccaggio, gli hobby o come officina")? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dshed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516829108
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516829819
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516830404
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516829745
Dalle dimensioni non sembrerebbero.

Inoltre, stai facendo un uso errato di building=terrace. Questo si applica solo per un insieme di case disposte a schiera. Per indicare la singola casa devi usare building=house. 

Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114690838
zebda78 (2021-12-25 20:04:35+00:00): quelle che ho segnato sono in effetti case ma erano le stalle di pertinenza della casa. Credevo che fosse la definizione migliore. 
Riguardo le case sono singole e diverse di struttura ma sono comunque unite. Se sto sbagliando a considerarle a schiera correggo.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-26 11:36:39+00:00): Ciao. Se sono tutte case, sia quelle che prima erano delle stalle che quelle attaccate alle altre, devi usare building=house. Ciao, Andrea
chnav (2023-04-21 10:54:09+00:00): Здравствуйте, приведите пожалуйста документ, по которому производилась правка границы. Дело в том, что я наносил поворотные точки по Договору между Казахстаном и Узбекистаном. Никакие ГИС-системы, графические карты и даже контрольно-следовые полосы в данном случае не являются источником данных. Единственный достоверный источник в данном случае это Договор. Если к нему вносились изменения пожалуйста дайте ссылку, я почитаю. Спасибо.
eggie (2021-12-08 09:04:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. lanes=1 heb ik verwijderd van de Oranjeweg.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
muzirian (2024-11-09 18:04:13+00:00): please check for existing features before importing
H@mlet (2021-12-08 11:08:43+00:00): Bonjour,
les bâtiments sont généralement rectangulaires malgré la vision un peu faussée des images satellites. Ici celui le plus au Sud est très certainement rectangulaire. Dans iD (l'éditeur que vous avez utilisé), il suffit d'appuyer sur "Q" pour "rendre carré" une forme sélectionnée (voir une doc ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:ID/Shortcuts).
Sinon vous pouvez ajouter les fosses à lisier (structures rondes) avec le tag building=slurry_tank (cf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:building%3Dslurry_tank).
Cordialement.
Warin61 (2021-12-12 03:40:58+00:00): .
Warin61 (2021-12-12 03:41:10+00:00): .
Warin61 (2021-12-12 03:41:18+00:00): .
Warin61 (2021-12-12 03:41:26+00:00): .
Warin61 (2021-12-12 22:04:20+00:00): .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:44:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Please collect a number of buildings before uploading them. Don't upload each single building at a time.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114693373
msevilla00 (2022-01-26 08:01:41+00:00): Hola Editator2000, estoy revisando algunos de tus ediciones y me parecen de gran calidad, muchas gracias. Te comento que estaría muy bien si en el comentario del conjunto de cambios fueras más preciso pues un "cambios varios" me parece un poco pobre. Muchas gracias y a seguir editando. Saludos. Miguel
SafetyIng (2021-12-16 10:14:38+00:00): Hey für die Kennzeichnung solcher Geräte haben wir in OSM ein Extra Tagging, dass nicht in den Namen gehört.
Ist vielleicht etwas eigen bei uns.
Das kannst du hier genauer nachlesen, wie das Gerät getaggt wird: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:telecom%3Dexchange
Frans S (2021-12-23 15:27:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions). Quite a number of buildings are oversized.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114694897
mosstreet (2021-12-08 10:21:19+00:00): Все одинаково отображаемого имени
kate_rocketdata (2021-12-08 11:07:31+00:00): добрый день. уточните, пожалуйста, что вы имеете в виду? Названия name:ru указаны вручную.
mosstreet (2021-12-08 12:32:21+00:00): Теперь добавьте имя оно не везде
PT-53 (2021-12-09 07:50:05+00:00): Hallo Landratsamt Ravensburg H,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Hier gibt es Infos dazu, wie man ein Impfzentrum in OSM korrekt einträgt:
Wiki - healtscare:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:healthcare
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare:speciality%3Dvaccination
OSM-Forums-Diskussion:
- https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71310
- https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71609

Paßt Du Deinen Eintrag noch entsprechend an?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Landratsamt Ravensburg H (2021-12-09 08:50:38+00:00): Ich habe jetzt einen Punkt mit den vorgegebenen Attributen gesetzt, passt das dann so?
PT-53 (2021-12-09 09:40:11+00:00): Ja, das
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9323153012
sollte jetzt so korrekt sein.

Du könntest noch die Öffnungszeiten und -  falls das Impfzentrum eine eigene Telefon-Nr. hat - diese ergänzen.
Wiki:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone

Das Impfzentrum sollte in den nächsten Stunbden / Tagen auf dieser Karte angezeigt werden:
https://wambachers-osm.website/Healthcare.html?map=14/47.802404/9.64016&base=OSM&data=VCEN,CSC&menu=ROOT,BASE,OVL,DOCS,MFAC,CV19

Grüße
Robert Whittaker (2022-01-09 18:53:32+00:00): Hi Emily, Many thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap.

I see you added a bank at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9320540695 in this changeset. Do you know its name (i.e. which bank it is)? That would be useful information to add.

Similarly, does the cafe at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010179149 have a name?
muchichka_s (2021-12-08 10:30:35+00:00): Правильна назва до набору змін: Додано автошляхи Р-05, Р-06 з деякими під'їздами. Треки можливо потребуватимуть уточнення. source: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/416-2021-%D0%BF#n7
Saeed SJ (2021-12-15 10:17:06+00:00): سلام
لطفا به تاریخ ویرایش هایی که توسط کاربران انجام میشود دقت کنید و بر اساس تصاویر هوایی قدیمی خطوط را ویرایش نکنید. در این قسمت میدان احداث شده است.
Nakaner (2021-12-16 12:50:44+00:00): Hi,

OpenStreetMap is a community project. It is established and broadly agreed that contributors to the data provide a meaningful comment when they upload their changes. Unfortunately, your comment "fix problems" does not really explain what you did. Instead, your comment is a problem.

What did you change in this changeset? Could you please explain this within 256 characters?

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards

Michael
marczoutendijk (2021-12-08 12:58:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114702419 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism.
eggie (2021-12-08 11:04:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Volgens de BAG zit nr 77 inderdaad hier. Wellicht klopt de nummering op de rest van de gebouwen ook niet (meer)


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
K3v1nNL (2021-12-08 11:09:14+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Correct Logisnext heeft het huisnummer meegenomen naar het nieuwe kantoor toen ze de fabriek hebben gesloten.

MVG

K3v1n
maraf24 (2022-01-16 22:27:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/924683062
Takie przeniesienie danych sklepu na obszar nie jest poprawne z tego powodu, że główny tag - shop=supermarket, pozostał na budynku.
A praktycznie nie ma narzędzia, które by łączyło obszar ze znajdującym się na nim POI.
W efekcie mamy sklep bez nazwy i obszar z nazwą, ale tagu głównego.
taxi301 (2022-01-18 08:21:15+00:00): już tam pozmieniał voltairovicz ale nie wiem czemu na jednorodzinny
maraf24 (2022-01-18 10:03:32+00:00): Oraz zostawił kopię tagów na obszarze. Chyba był zmęczony:)
eggie (2021-12-08 11:09:43+00:00): Dag Delta...

Goed om zaken actueel te maken. Zorg wel voor verbindingen met de overige wegen .. anders routeert het niet.
De officiele voetgangersoversteekplaatsen zijn er vogens mij niet. Dus niet op elka kruispunt een highway=crossing maken. Alleen als deze op het wegdek zijn ingetekend.
MVG
eggie
Delta12 (2021-12-08 11:45:19+00:00): Aangepast, hopelijk zo wel in orde?
eggie (2021-12-08 12:27:24+00:00): Genoeg te doen hier.. Ik heb nog wat verbindingen gemaakt met de aansluitende voetpaden
mkarau (2022-02-07 04:30:11+00:00): This is the correct road layout as of February 2022.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-08 16:05:41+00:00): Hi! Can you please make smaller geographical changesets? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks, Andrea
eggie (2021-12-08 11:12:46+00:00): Oke, maar in dat geval ook de regel construction=residential verwijderen
Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-08 11:14:48+00:00): De weg door de woonwijk is een highway=residential Dus geen unclassified.
De parkeerplaats kun je taggen met highway=service + service=parking_aisle
Delta12 (2021-12-08 11:20:35+00:00): thx, Zal nog is even kijken!
eggie (2021-12-08 11:29:46+00:00): Zo te zien staan hiet wel meer wegen in de woonwijken 'verkeerd 'getagd als unclassified.
De doorgaande wegen kunnen dat overigens wel zijn.. zelfs hoger.
Die doodlopende stukken zijn allemaal residential.
Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
Diacritic (2021-12-08 20:45:07+00:00): Hey MapAbility.

I’m not sure I understand the reason for your change.

You have moved the point where left turn to Brunton splits further south, and then added another traffic light node?

There is only one set of traffic lights for that direction of travel, and it is before the traffic island.

Further, by moving the split point on Brunton further west, you’ve made the lanes tag much less accurate.

What was wrong with the previous modelling?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114697556
MapAbility (2021-12-08 22:42:26+00:00): Hi Diacritic,

I moved the lane South to make lane transition smoother for navigation, it can probably go further South as there's a solid white line from the midway point and you shouldn't transition after that. The left turn lane splits midway under the Richmond tunnel and then the left turn lane has dedicated left turn traffic lights with a stop line where the traffic lights are placed.

I based the changes off these wiki's.

Traffic light information - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
- "The mapping of traffic signals is an abstraction that the particular junction or way is regulated by traffic lights.
It is not a representation of a particular device."

Junction information - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction - " This node should be positioned as the last point before the splay at which it is still possible to make a smooth turn."