piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
easbar (2022-10-28 18:35:13+00:00): One more: I'm pretty sure there are traffic signs that state a turn is restricted for hgv, but none that state that a turn is restricted for everything except a long list of vehicles. So 'except=bicycle' seems to make sense, but not 'except=motorcar;psv;moped;bicycle'.
mcliquid (2022-10-28 18:41:04+00:00): I think you forgot yourself as an author in the wiki entry right?
mcliquid (2022-10-28 18:41:56+00:00): Is there an entry on the wiki about the current tagging being wrong? Or is there an entry in the wiki that you are not allowed to use both tags at the same time?
easbar (2022-10-28 18:56:58+00:00): Ah yes thanks I just added myself as author in the wiki discussion.
No, the wiki does not mention this (or I missed it), but IMO it should. The wiki doesn't seem very complete overall btw.
mcliquid (2022-10-28 19:08:34+00:00): Yes, then the first step would be to have unity in the community and then in the wiki.
easbar (2022-10-28 19:14:03+00:00): Yes, that would be ideal. I only changed cases where judging from the history I was pretty sure that they were simply mistakes (note that for example iD has limited support and even had a bug until recently for restriction:xyz, https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9337). And in other cases like the present one I only left a comment or contacted the author directly, like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127760119

One thing I tried to figure out was if there is an *actual* use-case for using both schemes and I don't think so.
easbar (2022-10-28 19:15:18+00:00): How can we determine whether there is unity in the community? Judging from the number of cases of combined restriction+restriction:xyz usage I'd say there is unity already, even before I changed anything. And who is responsible for the wiki page?
mcliquid (2022-10-28 19:31:10+00:00): You should ask tagging Mailinglist and the new forum I guess. And the wiki is a free place as OSM is.
easbar (2022-10-28 20:18:42+00:00): I posted to the tagging mailing list
WoodWoseWulf (2022-05-24 21:21:37+00:00): Hola!
¿esta área parece que contiene casas?
mikko_tamura (2022-05-24 14:39:19+00:00): please square your buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121426820
imronade (2022-05-25 00:58:50+00:00): updated
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121426820
ivanbranco (2022-05-26 10:16:41+00:00): Ciao bertovp,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063289497/history

questo landuse=farmland che hai creato si sovrappone a un landuse farmland già esistente, inoltre comprende un edificio, magari volevi usare landuse=farmyard?
eggie (2022-05-24 17:40:10+00:00): Hi ticky 
You are asking for feedback. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dchalet

Suggestion: Set a node at the center of the chalet (or group of chalets)
not on every seperate chalet.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-December/thread.html#56806

Greetz,
eggie
ticki_52 (2022-05-25 08:02:21+00:00): Hi eggie,

thanks for your proposal. My intention was to set the house numbers correctly. As each chalet has its own house number, I would not set only one node for all. 

ticki_52
eggie (2022-05-25 08:05:10+00:00): Up to you :)
mikko_tamura (2022-05-24 14:37:12+00:00): please use amenity=school if it is school grounds
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121427193
imronade (2022-05-25 01:01:58+00:00): updated to school
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121427193
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-06 13:27:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122019759 where the changeset comment is: repair un-explained deletions in Moldova (DWG ticket #2022060610000169)
mariotomo (2022-05-24 15:44:18+00:00): la verdad perdi la cuenta de las veces que
te estoy ofreciendo aprender a hacerlo correctamente, describiendo lo que está al suelo, sin mapear para el enrutador.
"los editores anteriores" tienen nombres, y los puedes mencionar.
sanch3z (2022-05-25 19:31:03+00:00): Hallo Wopi und willkommen bei OSM!

soweit ich das beurteilen kann, war der Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063303645), den du eingezeichnet hast (bis auf den Teil im Nordosten) bereits vorhanden. Ist das so gewollt, dass sich dieser Wegverlauf größtenteils mit bereits eingezeichneten Wegen überschneidet?

Liebe Grüße, sanch3z
mariotomo (2022-05-24 15:42:51+00:00): hoy no tengo datos para validar … estas calles de servicio, existen en cuanto carreteras separadas? o sólo son carriles de las calles principales? en el segundo caso, no quisieras intentar describirlos con turn:lanes, y luego con gusto te lo reviso.
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 01:34:57+00:00): Gracias, le hechare un ojo al Wiki, haber como puedo aplicarle aquí en el cruce con la F Sur.
mariotomo (2023-01-23 12:53:22+00:00): hola. me considerarías la pregunta: "estas calles, existen en cuanto carreteras separadas?", gracias!

de la foto Maxar, diría que son carriles sin separación física, de la misma calzada.

sí el wiki te sirve para mejorar tu estilo, espero poder revisar y confirmarte, cuando lo hayas hecho.
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-06 13:27:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122019759 where the changeset comment is: repair un-explained deletions in Moldova (DWG ticket #2022060610000169)
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-06 13:27:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122019759 where the changeset comment is: repair un-explained deletions in Moldova (DWG ticket #2022060610000169)
SomeoneElse (2022-05-29 12:47:51+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain what "Update max speed from 55 mph to 60 mph based on GPS data and more current data from other map providers" means?
Most map providers' data will be licence-incompatible with OpenStreetMap, so we'll probably need to revert and redact this change..
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
Lejun (2022-05-25 10:32:28+00:00): Pour peu que les positions soient correctes alors j’ai qu’un truc à dire : « Nice! »
Mitza Lizalor (2022-05-25 20:40:36+00:00): Super. C'était la première fois que je faisais ce genre de modification, donc merci pour la vérif.
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-06 13:27:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122019759 where the changeset comment is: repair un-explained deletions in Moldova (DWG ticket #2022060610000169)
user_8101879 (2022-05-25 22:22:57+00:00): relation 14179027 is not closed and there is no role on the outer boundary.
Could you fix that ?
eggie (2022-05-24 17:33:34+00:00): Dag Nic.. Hier kun je inderdaad beter één grote parkeerplaats van maken.
amenity=parking
met parking=surface
Groet
eggie
mariotomo (2022-05-24 15:37:31+00:00): veo que todavía no has intentado resolver estos cruces utilizando turn:lanes.  son más compactos, más inmediatos para los programas de routing, ahorran buscar relaciones que involucren la calle en cuestión.
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 01:33:05+00:00): Buenas noches, no lo use por que tengo entendido es para uso de mas de 2 carriles en un mismo sentido, las calles en david, en barrio Manuel Quintero las calles son de 2 carriles con sentidos opuestos.
mariotomo (2023-01-23 12:49:52+00:00): bueno, si este es lo que tienes entendido, te sugiero revises el wiki. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:lanes#Carriles_en_diferentes_direcciones
mariotomo (2022-05-24 16:38:06+00:00): quizás una completa solución de este fixme tan genérico podría ser dibujar el área en que insiste el centro comercial incluyendo todo lo anexo, o sea sin limitarse al edificio de ventas.  

si tienes tiempo, la extensión de los parqueos, las rutas de buscar parqueo?

es cierto que ya está mejor que antes.
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 01:46:32+00:00): Gracias, lo tendere en cuenta, visitare el lugar para mejorale.
porfiriopaiz (2022-05-25 04:40:43+00:00): Please do not use the name tag to add the name of a species.

name=* - for individual trees which have a name, usually these are either individual trees with a historical or traditional name or trees with a name given in memory of special events (> memorial tree). The usual rules for name=* apply. This tag must not be used for a description of the species.

Please take a look at the documentation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree

Regards,
Porfirio
MoiraPrime (2022-05-24 14:59:01+00:00): Changeset comment I forgot to put: Fixed Sawmill Road in Laurel and mapped a currently under-construction roundabout
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-06 13:27:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122019759 where the changeset comment is: repair un-explained deletions in Moldova (DWG ticket #2022060610000169)
jeis_BKG (2022-05-25 13:33:05+00:00): Hi jk_bkg, bitte noch das Gebäudetagging  in building=school ändern.
Danke und Grüße,
jeis_BKG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121429540
jesswynne (2022-05-24 15:04:53+00:00): Source = Survey
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-06 13:27:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122019759 where the changeset comment is: repair un-explained deletions in Moldova (DWG ticket #2022060610000169)
Lejun (2022-05-25 07:32:06+00:00): Salut et merci de la contribution.

J’ai comme un doute pour le photographe, c’est tout le bâtiment qui est à l’établissement ou seulement un local commercial ?

Pour la station l’idée est bonne mais l’exécution est à revoir, pas de quoi s’affoler c’est plutôt du à iD qu’autre chose. Je corrige ça.
Etyloppihacilem (2022-05-25 14:08:41+00:00): Le Rez de chaussé est occupé par un photographe et une auto école (auto école holder). J'essaye de trouver comment m'occuper de ça :)
Lejun (2022-05-25 17:43:59+00:00): Deux solutions, soit tu passes par de l’indoor mapping[1] mais c’est une activité relativement avancée, où tu peux simplement indiquer l’établissement par un nœud. Je te recommande la seconde solution en supprimant les attributs en trop du bâtiment. Je reste à disposition, hésite pas à me contacter si t’as besoin d’une vérif’ rapide ou autre chose.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Simple_Indoor_Tagging
Jakka (2022-05-25 06:36:40+00:00): batiment dans le jardin... "shed"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dshed
jleedev (2022-05-24 15:31:33+00:00): Vandalism, reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-06 13:27:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122019759 where the changeset comment is: repair un-explained deletions in Moldova (DWG ticket #2022060610000169)
jleedev (2022-05-24 15:44:21+00:00): Vandalism, reverted
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-06 13:27:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122019759 where the changeset comment is: repair un-explained deletions in Moldova (DWG ticket #2022060610000169)
kwiatek_123 (2023-10-21 22:07:14+00:00): Na pewno w poniższych dwóch parafiach ma być wycięta dziura?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13750835
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13750837
sanch3z (2022-05-24 18:19:46+00:00): Hallo Neb the B,

bist du sicher, dass diese Häuser der Luise-Rinser-Straße zugehörig sind? Die Zugangswege zu diesen Gebäuden führen bisher in OSM und laut den aktuellsten Satellitenbildern zum Hermann-Hesse-Weg. Könntest du eine Quelle zu diesen Adressänderungen angeben?

Grüße, sanch3z
sanch3z (2022-05-24 18:26:57+00:00): Entschuldigung, du hattest deine Quelle in deinem Änderungssatz angegeben. Wenn die Gebäude zur Luise-Rinser-Straße gehören, dann ist wahrscheinlich diese Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29264070) falsch benannt. Nochmal danke, dass du dir meine Verbesserungsvorschläge zu deinen Changeset-Kommentaren zu Herzen genommen hast.

Grüße, sanch3z
Neb the B (2022-05-25 19:32:06+00:00): Habe nun auch die Straßensituation der Realität angepasst. Ich hinke etwas mit den Änderungen hinterher.
Ich bin offen für Kritik ;-) Deine Kritik war ja zudem auch konstruktiv. Also alles gut.
WoSoe (2022-05-29 06:13:59+00:00): Falsche und doppelte Adressen sind mittlerweile ein flächiges Problem im gesamten Bereich geworden. :-(
Hier mal eine Abfrage, welche NUR die doppelten Adressen anzeigt.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1iRa

Sieht mir nach einem systematischen Fehler aus.

Mein Vorschlag:
- Ursache ermitteln (Tool, Arbeitsablauf, User, ...)
- doppelte Adressen bereinigen
- falschen Adresszuordnungen suchen und beheben

Eventuell mit dem OSM Inspector oder damit
https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=addresses-by&layer=misplaced#49.42689,10.96118,16z
herausfinden.

Zwischenzeitlich andere Mappingaktivitäten einschränken :-)
Neb the B (2022-05-29 09:12:31+00:00): Check nochmal. Der Grund ist, dass teilweise die Straßennamen schon (falsch) vorbelegt waren und ich das nicht mehr geprüft habe. Und weil das der mapper das teilweise automatisch (falsch) belegt.
Ich werde zukünftig nochmal die Straße checken.
Hinweis: In Zirndorf ist das mit den Straßen und Hausnummer nicht so einfach. ;-) Hier gibt es Doppelhäuser die zu zwei verschieden Straßen und Hausnummern gehören. Hier gibt es häußer die augenscheinlich nebeneinander stehen aber einer vollkommen anderen Logik der benamsund und nummern folgen.
Mannivu (2022-05-24 16:24:08+00:00): Ho controllato dalle immagini satellitari e tutto corrisponde a quanto mappato. Forse ci sono da aggiustare alcune restrizioni di svolta che sono rimaste e non cancellate.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121433048
Farfetch'd (2022-06-13 08:57:25+00:00): Michał sprawdź zapisy prawne, bo twoje edycje są zwykłym wandalizmem.
1. W Polsce teren szkoły musi być ogrodzony. (twoje oznaczenie terenu szkoly wychodzi poza ogrodzenie)
2. Teren szkoły =/= terenowi działki.
3. Szkoła nie jest właścicielem terenu. OGRODZONA część działki jest zarządzana przez szkołę, ale właścicielem nadal jest gmina/miasto etc.
Lejun (2022-05-25 07:27:52+00:00): Pas d’erreur apparente, tout est bon – Je suis repassé derrière pour fusionner avec le nœud qui faisait doublon.
MaGIStokrat (2022-05-24 18:58:56+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

bist Du dir sicher, dass in der Terrassensaison nur Rad+Fußgänger auf der Straße Altmarkt/Berliner flanieren dürfen?

Mit access=no sperrst du ALLE Verkehrsteilnehmer aus.

Fahren dürfen aber auch Taxi,ÖPNV (Tram hat eig. Gleis),Polizei,FW,zT Lieferfzg.

Bitte schnellstens korrigieren!
Fotos vorhanden?

Gruß MaGIStokrat
Fabian1429 (2022-05-24 19:53:34+00:00): Achso ja, hab ich vergessen.
Danke für den Hinweis :)

Gruß Fabian1429
MxxCon (2022-05-25 02:54:23+00:00): Hello.
Those small "mustache" segments between sidewalks and crosswalks perhaps should be tagged as sidewalks too.. :)

Also, please note that crosswalks that are controlled by traffic lights should be tagged as "crossing=traffic_signals".
"crossing=marked" is intended for crosswalks with STOP signs. 👍 You can read more this tag at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121434095
noneck (2022-05-25 14:08:54+00:00): Thanks for the comment. I will tag you in the slack to discuss this.  @zhik and I have been under the impression that the wiki link you sent says something else.
user_5359 (2022-05-25 15:51:21+00:00): Hello! Plese have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1063282002 (only an example). What is the meaning of the tag DETALJTYP = Komplementbyggnad?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-08-06 03:14:40+00:00): Hey friend, thank you for your contribution in OSM, but can you use a meaning ful changeset comment? Only a number "1" can't help other mapper understand what you did. Thanks!
mikko_tamura (2022-05-24 17:40:56+00:00): square your buildings please
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121434848
Hady Prast PMI (2022-05-24 18:31:51+00:00): Ready to be in the square
Bazmap (2023-04-22 17:15:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis Arthur Bazin et suis en charge des chemins de randonnée sur la commune de Lucinges ainsi que des données SIG (cartographiques).
J'ai vu que vous aviez ajouté plusieurs poteaux indicateurs pour les itinéraires de randonnées.
Pourriez-vous m'indiquer la source de la donnée ? En effet, j'ai identifié plusieurs erreurs et nous souhaitons avoir une donnée fiable sur la commune.
Merci beaucoup et excellente journée.
Arthur Bazin
dwarfclimbs (2023-04-27 08:44:09+00:00): Bonjour
Je m'excuse par avance des erreurs que j'ai pu faire dans les collectes de données lors de mes randonnées dans le massif.
Dans un souci d'amélioration continu, pouvez vous m'indiquer quelles types d'erreurs commises.
Merci et bonne journée
Didier
Bazmap (2023-04-29 12:33:29+00:00): Bonjour,

En fait il n'y a pas beaucoup d'erreur :-), simplement deux poteaux : 
Celui du Pont des Mottes qui n'existe plus et qui ne va être pas être replacé malheureusement.
Celui juste à côté noté "Prés de Cran Sud" qui n'a en fait pas de nom et dont l'altitude est plutôt 960m (il me semble qu'il y a eu une confusion avec le poteau situé justement à Près de Cran Sud :-) ). D'ailleurs il ne s'agit que d'une balise directionnelle à cet endroit ce qui m'a mis sur la piste d'une probable confusion.
J'ai corrigé la donnée :-)

Bon du coup il ne s'agit que de relevés personnels donc merci beaucoup pour l'ajout de ces informations.
En fait j'avais peur que vous n'ayez obtenu une couche par une source de données non officielle et que vous aviez simplement ajouté les données.

Merci pour le retour et surtout pour les contributions.

Bon mapping :-)
Arthur Bazin
user_5359 (2022-05-25 15:55:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a way with the tag Path=footway. This way will be not visible of the map! Our correct key is highway (for the correct value please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway).
user_5359 (2022-05-25 15:56:08+00:00): see http://www.osm.org/way/1063340352/history
willkmis (2022-05-24 18:46:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like you changed this bike path (highway=cycleway) to a freeway (highway=motorway). Did you mean to do that, or do you want to make a different change?
willkmis (2022-06-06 22:01:32+00:00): I changed this bike path back to its previous tagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122044823. I'm not sure what you intended, but this definitely isn't a freeway. If you meant to add different information to this way, feel free to comment here and maybe I can help you find an appropriate tag.
toyotagps (2022-12-11 15:13:23+00:00): Скажите, а для чего был сделан такой большой акцент на ремонт одной половины моста? Движение в обе стороны осталось, как и было ранее. Да, добавились ограничения. Но их можно было поставить на время ремонта на старый вей не создавая новый.
user_5359 (2022-05-25 15:45:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/236725715/history. What is the meaning of the tags     
CONSIDER = Add oneway=yes; Remove lanes:backward=2; Remove lanes:forward=1; Remove lanes=3; Remove turn:lanes:backward=left|
    DIFF = Remove placement:backward=left_of:1
    EDIT = Removed int_ref=E 134
    highway = trunk
    lanes = 2
    maxspeed = 60
    name = Haukelivegen
    oneway = yes
    placement = middle_of:2
    ref = E 134
    surface = paved
    turn:lanes = left|through
user_5359 (2022-05-25 15:48:21+00:00): Edit of the first comment: all keys with lowercase characters are okay.
Land Owner (2024-03-11 19:31:35+00:00): This goes across private property.
Please remove immediately.
Greg_Rose (2024-03-12 08:55:22+00:00): WHAT goes across private property? This changeset you've put into discussion mode touched/added many different roads and trails. Please identify the way id number(s) you're referring to... or at the VERY least, please give decimal coordinates of the spot in question. The more decimal places the better - five minimum (i.e. 45.57419 N, 122.56975 W).  
Thanks...
Land Owner (2024-03-12 19:07:40+00:00): Greg,

    Track #1261372045
    This is a BPA access road that is on my private land

    Track #1261934625
    Is a tractor path, entirely on my property, why and how is it even marked?

    Track #1261934631
    Is a tractor path, entirely on my property, why and how is it even marked?

As for the rest of the information you are asking for, I do not know. 
I never wanted to be a part of this community, but because of OpenStreetMap and AllTrails guiding people onto my property they are putting my family at risk.
We just want to be left alone and not live in fear of strangers confronting us on our own property.
Greg_Rose (2024-03-14 05:57:43+00:00): Greetings - after examination, I've concluded that I've never touched any of those three ways in any changeset that I've submitted. 
I was going to see what I could do to remedy your issue, but based on your activity in OSM, you appear to be a thoroughly unpleasant individual and have no actual interest in remediation. Good luck with that.  
Just so you're aware, you're going after a globe-spanning group of GIS pros and hobbyists who are obsessed with accurate mapping. If you ever get tired of the back-and-forth, drop me a line via my profile page: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Greg_Rose)
Lejun (2022-05-25 10:41:14+00:00): Vu et validé
PT-53 (2022-05-25 06:12:36+00:00): Hallo  miscosm,
für diese Treppe
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063351364/history
wird im OSM-Inspector ein Hinweis "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.98711&lat=48.68186&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points

Kümmerst Du Dich darum?
Fragende Grüße
miscosm (2022-05-27 19:24:27+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich wollte es gerade beheben, aber FvGordon war schneller.
jleedev (2022-05-24 18:17:25+00:00): Vandalism, reverted.
MxxCon (2022-05-25 02:58:05+00:00): Ping Pong and Table Tennis are not the same games😏
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121438087
SHARCRASH (2022-05-24 18:08:46+00:00): + source of Moselle³ updated
gurglypipe (2022-05-25 23:21:36+00:00): And Portsmouth too by the look of it.

Please try and keep changesets limited to one city or geographical area, as it helps others review edits.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks!
eerib (2022-05-24 19:49:13+00:00): Hello robcocquyt,

I've reverted your changeset as deleting roads/paths on private property is not the correct approach. I've instead marked the roads/paths with a private access tag. One of the reasons it's important that we have these roads/trails on the map is that first responders and other safety-related groups use the map to respond to emergencies.

For more information on this topic, please refer to this wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

Most apps and other online mapping services that use OpenStreetMap data will update over the coming weeks/months with the updates information and display the roads/paths as private.

Thank you, eerib
eggie (2022-05-24 19:32:42+00:00): Feedback...lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
Patr1k_P (2022-05-25 17:19:32+00:00): Please use Ortofotomozaika SR
bordaben (2022-05-25 18:50:12+00:00): How do you guys use Ortofotomozaika SR? For every new item I'm mapping, I'm using the source=Ortofotomozaika SR tag. 
Should I re-tag every road/buildings with the Ortofotomozaika SR tag even if it's just a little geometry adjustment?
The changeset source is always contains the Orthophoto source too.
Patr1k_P (2022-05-25 21:07:46+00:00): That's all fine, but under the changeset you also need to indicate Ortofotomozaika SR
bordaben (2022-05-26 07:15:09+00:00): So you mean instead of Orthophoto mosaic Slovakia in the changeset source I should use Ortofotomozaika SR. I thought the two are the same just in different languages and it's interchangeable. But okay, in the future I will use  Ortofotomozaika SR in the changeset source too.