piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:20:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Constable (2018-02-23 17:47:44+00:00): ciao, grazie per le modifiche che stai facendo. Ti scrivo a riguardo delle aree mappate come parco in via Santa Cecilia.
L'area più grossa credo vada bene mappata come parco ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park ), le altre piccoline però a me sembrano più aiuole, direi quindi che il tag più appropriato sia landuse=grass ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass ). Concordi con me?
Questa area centrale invece io la mapperei quasi come highway=pedestrian + area=yes, in modo da indicare che è uno spiazzo pedonale, lo stesso si potrebbe fare anche con quello spiazzo pedonale appena a nord-ovest del condominio a forma di C.
Sono solo mie impressione, sei liberissimo di scegliere di fare ciò che preferisci, io non conosco quella via in particolare.
Grazie, ciao!
da_pigo (2018-02-23 20:45:00+00:00): Grazie! Dovrei aver sistemato e apportato altre migliorie. Sono alle prime armi e i tuoi consigli sono davvero preziosi, grazie di nuovo, ciao!
Constable (2018-02-24 08:32:50+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la risposta e per l'ottimo lavoro che stai facendo.
Vorrei consigliarti un'altra cosa; i tratti di percorso pedonale che passano sotto gli edifici vanno mappati con tag tunnel=building_passage, per far capire che passano sotto l'edificio.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel#tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage
Così per capirci: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506254558
Se hai scrivi pure, per quanto possibile cerco volentieri di aiutarti
Grazie, ciao!
da_pigo (2018-02-25 11:17:13+00:00): Dovrei aver sistemato anche questo! Grazie di nuovo
Constable (2018-02-25 11:35:10+00:00): perfetto, grazie a te per l'ottimo lavoro!
tux67 (2018-02-24 11:34:03+00:00): hi db1mv
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Dein Monument hast du 2x angelegt. Das Duplikat habe ich weider entfernt. Nur als kleiner Hinweis: Wenn du mit Osmand mappst, werden deine Änderungen in Osmand erst nach dem nächsten Kartenupdate angezeigt - es sei denn du hast Osmand Live. Auch bei der "richtigen" Webseite dauert es etwas bis die Karte den POI zeigt.

Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig -  immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56613037
Gerold (2018-03-02 12:20:23+00:00): Bist Du dir mit der PLZ sicher?
plz-server.de spuckt mir 73553 aus
BeKri (2018-03-02 15:30:20+00:00): Hüstel ... erledigt
Gerold (2018-03-02 15:34:02+00:00): Top!
eggie (2018-02-23 17:01:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Helaas is OSM geen testomgeving. De aardrijkskundige naam Grote oude boom hoort niet op de kaart. De boom staat in een gebied landuse=forest. Dat is bijna als het gezegde "door de bomen" het bos niet meer zien.
we taggen geen natural=tree in landuse=forest. 
Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-02-23 17:05:27+00:00): De naam "Grote oude boom" heb ik verwijderd.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-02-24 20:07:04+00:00): Thx! Leuk om nog wat mappers te hebben in regio Brugge!
user_5359 (2018-02-23 16:43:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the new highway with the existing highways.
WillowsTC18 (2018-02-23 16:50:43+00:00): The Willows Lane connects to Ridge Road
user_5359 (2018-02-23 16:55:02+00:00): Thank you for the comment, I have add this connection. Short question: Is the road (Broadleaf Lane, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432695343) already finished?
WillowsTC18 (2018-02-23 17:15:09+00:00): Broadleaf Lane is completed, but it is shown in the wrong location on this map.  I will edit it to show the correct location.
messpert (2018-03-11 17:37:18+00:00): I have just noticed that you have removed these side road names. That is surely wrong!
The address of the houses along these side roads is that of the road of which they are a "part", in this case Burford Road. It is very common in Witney for side roads to share the name with a road from which they branch. I think that this needs reverting. People need to be able to find addresses from road names. 

If it is somehow inconvenient for travel line , it is surely a trivial bit of programming to inspect the highway tag when several roads share a name to determine the principal road.
Hernan (2018-02-23 17:36:28+00:00): Hola, porque borraste todos estos comercios y la estacion de servicio?
SHARCRASH (2018-02-26 14:54:00+00:00): Salut Pierre! Attention aux MP,  tu avais effacé la relation pour le périmètre externe de la zone résidentielle d'Arlon. Je viens de la remettre.
JohnHovercraft (2018-03-07 19:42:12+00:00): I think you may have accidentally removed a section of Ashbourne Lane or Dartmoor Drive in this change as there's now a gap in the road. Can you check?
FvGordon (2018-03-07 22:35:50+00:00): Sorry, I just fixed it. The node, which connected the two ways with different names was also a duplicate node of two landuses, which i removed.
JohnHovercraft (2018-03-07 23:07:18+00:00): Thanks. I think still there's a small section of what should be Ashbourne Lane that's currently named Harland Circle. Not sure when that happened.
JohnHovercraft (2018-03-08 15:07:16+00:00): I merged that little section in with the rest of Ashbourne Lane. All good now.
DD1GJ (2018-02-23 19:16:47+00:00): Löschung des fiktiven Parks über die Privatgärten der Nachbarhäuser zur besseren Glaubwürdigkeit und Qualität der Karte.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
OttawaHiking (2018-11-29 22:53:59+00:00): Hello Matthew, endpoints of some address interpolation lines were moved north of their previous locations (see, for example, the lines near lat=44.4965&lon=-80.3015). Could you please take another look at this change. Thank you!
Matthew Darwin (2018-11-30 05:37:51+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out.  Obviously the objects got moved in JOSM when I did the renames.  I reverted my change and then re-did the change.  Looks ok to me now.
szydzio (2018-07-10 13:19:24+00:00): Tym zestawem zmian wykasowałeś kilkanaście obiektów typu building:part  (wykorzystywanych do modelowania 3D) na Dąbrowszczaków. Jaki był powód usunięcia tych obiektów?
mueschel (2018-03-01 07:31:33+00:00): Hi,
could you check the house number tag here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563664795
Cheers, Jan
user_5359 (2018-03-01 14:38:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A tree with an address? Could you a letter to him?
Constable (2018-02-23 17:51:54+00:00): ciao, banvenuto su osm!
Quest'area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563674210 sei sicuro sia davvero un parco? una volta era un campo da calcio, ora (dalle immagini aeree) sembra quasi un prato abbandonato, con dentro rifiuti ?!
Il tag park indica un'area ricreativa dove si trovano bambini/ragazzi che giocano,... questa lo è?
grazie, ciao!
utack (2018-03-13 22:59:31+00:00): Hi geri,  
ist auf den "Fotos vor Ort" zufällig  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315159624  
mit drauf?  
vehicle=destination und foot=no erscheint etwas seltsam, oder?
geri-oc (2018-03-14 08:40:20+00:00): Vor kurzem auf foot=private geändert.
Es ist das Schild für Bahngelände.
Von dieser Seite habe ich es nicht mehr, aber von der Gegenseite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Bahngel%C3%A4nde_Hainsberg.jpg

Das foot müsste eigentlich no sein - laut Bahntafel. Aber die Anlieger müssen ja auch zu Fuß hin. Und auf dieser Seite geht ein nichtgesperrter Pfad von unter der Brücke zur Dresdner Straße - deshalb ein Stück permissive.
Gruß Gerd
Akkurator (2018-02-27 01:54:23+00:00): Was ist hier passiert?
Ich kann mir kaum vorstellen, dass die Brücke abgerissen wurde und nun Bauland ist (landuse=construction).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563676207

Bitte CS-Kommentare verwenden, damit Mitmapper nicht ratlos dastehen.
Akkurator (2018-02-27 02:12:18+00:00): Ok, hab's gefunden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19188813/history

Bitte Objekte nicht einfach löschen und neu etwas anderes neu einzeichnen.

Man hätte z.B. einfach die vorhandene Brücke auf "demolished" oder "construction" setzen können.
So bliebe die Historie nachvollziehbar. und niemand stellt dumme Fragen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-02 17:18:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563676414/history has cc = rura that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
user_5359 (2018-02-23 21:44:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
RubikCubical (2018-02-24 02:56:23+00:00): What's with the frog stuff? What does that mean?
freebeer (2018-02-25 11:12:33+00:00): Hallo Lvan-no-no-no,
See for example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56508413
It means there are countless millions of Pacific Chorus Frogs piled high along the banks of the raging Ross River, previously the gentle Ross Creek, awaiting either the establishment and subsequent mapping of a frog-ferry to guide them across the perilous rapids (they avoid the mapped streets for reasons best known to the Cane Toad), or an explanation regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55882988 .
Not to worry, for the sake of #WontSomebodyThinkOfTheFrogs due to non-response I have calmed the waters and lo, witness the throngs of fat juicy tadpoles now trying to avoid the ravenously hungry ducks now attracted to this peaceful idyll within the bustling city.
Hope that helps!!!
Dr Kludge (2018-03-03 18:49:32+00:00): @freebeer ha ha ha.
@RubikCubical it means that this area must have been mapped for the Pokemon game.  If you look at this swimming pool, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479980367/history , then you can see it was mapped as water first with perhaps a node for the actual swimming pool.  I am guessing @freebeer had a hand in cleaning up this area and a bunch of California changesets that had the same frog song for a changeset comment.
Hein Zin (2018-02-24 08:05:24+00:00): why did you change myanmar area ?
မောင် တော and ဘူးသီးတောင် occupy by myanmar.
not bangladesh
kent1D (2018-02-24 18:07:43+00:00): I only changed metas, no typology.

I am not able to find your first example but the second is : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5996583

It's in Rakhine state which is still in Myanmar

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5996483

Or please point me the good relation or node if I don't understand.

Sorry in advance if I made a mistake
4004 (2018-02-24 22:53:28+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты
тип обьекта в название не добавляется, и убирать категорию (хостел) тоже не стоило. поправил
lakedistrict (2018-02-23 18:00:42+00:00): Hi Rogerc, thanks for your updates. The preferred way to map places is as a node in the centre of the settlement. This is because the boundary cannot always be verified and doesn't always match up with the main residential area. Reinstating the Gleaston hamlet node and removing the name from the residential area would probably be a good idea. :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dhamlet
lakedistrict (2018-02-23 18:02:16+00:00): Actually village would probably be better (that's what they call themselves).
Rogerc (2018-02-23 18:33:29+00:00): Thanks, lakedistrict. I will take your advice. The reason I did it was that I found Gleaston was not showing up well an the rendered map (I was there yesterday), but probably changing it to village would help on that.
user_5173844 (2018-02-23 21:17:04+00:00): Nice work!
Constable (2018-02-23 17:57:24+00:00): hi there Jasper, part of this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563685431 looks to me like a soccer pitch, is this actually a park?
JeeperCraig (2018-02-23 18:17:19+00:00): Area was updated to a soccer field. A majority of the field is for soccer, while the remainder of the area is multi-use.
Constable (2018-02-24 08:52:49+00:00): Hi there, thanks for your reply.
Given that soccer pitches have a well defined shape I decided to split that area in two, one with the usual soccer pitch shape, while I tagged the other one as a park, what do you think?
In case you reckon this doesn't reflect reality we could easily revert my changest/update the area again.
Thanks!
Constable (2018-02-24 08:52:58+00:00): *changeset
Berci75 (2018-03-10 18:26:32+00:00): No lám, tiéd a dicsőség, hogy aktíváltad az útvonalat. Most olvastam, hogy szerdán jönnek Viktorék átadni...
Számomra azért fontos ez az útvonal, mert ezen járok dolgozni. Szóval: HURRÁ!
Neked meg további jó szerkesztgetést, mert látom ez volt az első.
user_3022894 (2018-04-24 08:04:57+00:00): Danke für's Überarbeiten!
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-24 02:00:53+00:00): I'm not 100% sure what the goal was here, but I did notice that a bridge got extended and lane tagging got merged when two ways were merged.  Also please avoid oneway=-1 except as a last resort when the way (for whatever reason) has to be reversed as a dependency on something else (very rare).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56616778
surveyor54 (2018-02-24 12:57:04+00:00): Hi turankaya74,
you have created many nodes here without any tags and they do not belong to a way.

Please check it.

Regards 
surveyor54
turankaya74 (2018-02-24 13:00:11+00:00): I'm correcting it. I need time to do everything
Glassman (2024-08-29 00:00:35+00:00): The DWG received a message that 342 Duffield  Road Derby DE22 1ER should be the southern most of the two semi-detached houses. Could you look this over?
Dave Venables (2024-08-29 07:47:21+00:00): Has been updated using Mapillary images https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344116332
Dave Venables (2024-08-29 10:21:09+00:00): Details confirmed after cycling past and checking.
342 is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344116332
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-24 02:06:24+00:00): This looks more like a highway=turning_circle than a loop.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56617866
Humus015 (2018-02-24 12:30:33+00:00): Good day,  is the end of the road where the trucks can reverse and turn back with appropriate space. I never seen an highway turning at 360 degrees.
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-25 03:50:34+00:00): RIght, without an island, that's a turning circle.  With an island, you mapped it correctly.  Looking at the aerial photography (Bing and DigitalGlobe), it looks like a turning circle.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle
Glassman (2018-02-23 21:43:40+00:00): Nice edit - a couple of tips - We don't really have any living streets in the US. It's mostly an Europe thing and when adding street names  - we spell them out instead of abbreviating. (Software can easily abbreviate names but has a hard time un-abbreviating) 

One other thing I noticed -  The county thinks the road is called Morgan Creek Road that makes a loop off of  Salmon La Sac Road. Although they are not infallible.
JJIglesias (2018-02-23 21:22:17+00:00): Si bien entiendo q el pueblo y la escuela estan nombradas como Tunasani, dejo claro que en las cartas de 1:100K tanto del IGM como la Gringa, Tunasani queda al NorOeste de Capinota y no aqui, en esta posicion segun el INE/IGM esta Pata Rancho
JJIglesias (2018-02-23 22:27:26+00:00): Potosi, NO tiene ninguna poblacion registrada como Tunazani o Tunasani, esas dos denominaciones pertenecen a poblaciones en Cochabamba que YA estan registradas. El porque la escuela se llama UE Tunazani lo desconozco, lo que si esta claro q ni en las cartas del IGM ni en el registro del INE aparece nada de Tunazani/Tunasani en esta posicion
5m4u9 (2018-02-23 23:35:41+00:00): revisando la hoja 6439iv de torotoro 1:50k la estancia tunasani existe en el lugar, en el sicoes encontré referencias del municipio torotoro y servicio de buses escolares en las escuelas tunasani, yambata, llallaguani. no será un error del IgM? para reportarlo
JJIglesias (2018-02-24 03:01:28+00:00): Puede ser obviamente un erros pero esos nombres fueron dados antes del Censo Nacional de Vivienda y Poblacion cuando el INE fue por todos los asientos electorales y recopilo la data de cada poblacion, si los habitantes o las autoridades locales le pusieron Pata Rancho y antes estaba Tunasani; para todos los efectos legales ese lugar se llama Pata Rancho, asi tradicionalmente se haya llamado Tunasani; por cierto la poblacion de Tunasani de Cochabamba  queda relativamente cerca de esta "otra" Tunasani que queda en Oruro...
JJIglesias (2018-02-24 03:02:08+00:00): en Potosi perdon...
JJIglesias (2018-02-24 03:37:02+00:00): yo lo dejaria con name y alt_name hasta que podamos descartar uno u otro...
berndw (2018-02-24 14:16:07+00:00): Hallo

bitte kein Mapping für oder gegen den Router, besser eine Fehlermeldung an den Programmierer.

ein access=no hat u.U. auch Auswirkungen auf erlaubte Nutzung, z.B. für Fahrräder.
wolly79bn (2018-02-25 12:02:58+00:00): Hallo, das ist missverstanden worden. Es handelt sich um eine Art Trampelpfad ziemlich Steil im Hang. Das geht wirklich nur zu Fuß. Zwischendurch kommen auch Treppen.
berndw (2018-02-25 15:57:23+00:00): Dann teil den Weg an den Stufen auf, ein guter Router achtet auf so etwas, eine weitere Möglichkeit wären Tags wie smoothness, width, trail_visibility.
Marco_T (2018-02-28 13:23:24+00:00): Ciao blckdrgn e benvenuto su OSM!
Dato che sembri conoscere la zona, se hai occasione, dai un occhio alle "Note" aperte intorno a questo punto che forse sono di facile soluzione (le vedi dalla pagina principale di OSM cliccando sul bottone "Livelli", a destra). Grazie per il tuo contributo!
ovruni (2018-02-25 03:27:49+00:00): Debido a que se trata de subestaciones eléctricas, he procedido a cambiar las etiquetas de "shop=electronics" a "power=substation". Para cualquier contacto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
Omar
Gazer75 (2018-03-13 16:00:13+00:00): You have added the population for the entire municipality to the city nodes which is wrong.
Aso there are a set number of places in Norway that are defined as a city. These are not. Please read the wiki on tagging in Norway
Gazer75 (2018-03-13 16:04:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features#Places.2FSteder
GerdP (2022-07-01 06:45:42+00:00): Moin!
Im Moment ist der gesammte Wald mit dem Namen Friedeholz versehen https://www.osm.org/relation/14172661
Du hast hier https://www.osm.org/way/563710490
einen Teil als "Bassumer Friedeholz" erfasst. Vermutlich ist der Name an der Relation falsch?
Jacek79 (2022-07-02 19:45:58+00:00): Das ist tatsächlich richtig: Das NSG Bassumer Friedeholz umfasst nur eine Teilfläche des Waldes Friedeholz.
GerdP (2022-07-02 19:50:35+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die Rückmeldung!
Gazer75 (2018-06-12 00:25:29+00:00): Please do not add power lines without doing research. NVE data is outdated. This line was dismantled around two years ago when the new 420kV line through Sogn og Fjordane was completed.
Gazer75 (2018-06-12 00:31:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563713495 to be clear
abakus_uploader (2018-02-23 23:30:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Geofreund1 (2019-02-18 16:57:07+00:00): Hallo wegavision,
könnte es sein, dass du die Hausnummern für die Geschwister-Scholl-Straße falsch der Erich-Kästner-Straße zugeordnet hast?
Bitte mal prüfen.
Danke
wegavision (2019-02-19 06:30:49+00:00): Wenn es falsch ist, einfach ändern.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
steak country (2018-03-22 11:24:59+00:00): Je ne comprends pas cette modification. Cette route n'est pas qu'à usage agricole mais aussi utilisée par pas mal de riverains. Elle est asphaltée (ou bétonnée ?) et, même si le wiki indique qu'une "track" peut être asphaltée, l'usage répandu en Belgique est de taguer les chemins de campagne et de remembrement asphaltés en "unclassified" et de réserver les "track" pour les "chemins de terre". Si cela est une "track", alors il faut changer le taguing de centaines de chemins de campagne en Belgique.
woodpeck (2025-08-04 11:53:38+00:00): Hallo wolly79bn, vor 7 Jahren hast Du diesen landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb mit Namen erfasst. Kannst Du Dich noch erinnern, wo Du den Namen herhattest - war da ein öffentlich lesbares Schild oder...?
wolly79bn (2025-08-04 12:00:45+00:00): Nennen wir es lokale Persönlichkeit, stand aber auch so im Telefonbuch. Mittlerweile ist es aber eigentlich Stefan Hansen. https://firmeneintrag.creditreform.de/53474/5030779307/STEFAN_HANSEN_MARGARETHENHOF