piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
avinet_ua (2022-01-13 18:09:48+00:00): покажи, будь ласка об"єкт який. там скоріше за все не стояло взагалі тип і я поставив мінор, оскільки тільки з вказаним типом пс відображаються на мапі.

а що то за сайт - на долоні?
avinet_ua (2022-01-13 18:11:43+00:00): не фантазія, на мапі чітко видно високовольтні лінії та низьковольтні
olehz (2022-01-13 21:02:36+00:00): Фантазія. Бо ти схем не маєш, мінорні лінії наносиш як високовольтні, при чому рандомно їх зєднюєш часто нелогічно і наносиш їх зигзагами кривими і сегментами. Обленерго нормально не може нанести мінорні лінії (бо їх тупо не видно часто + купа підземних кабелів + все постійно міняється), ну допустимо ти можеш, але ж воно всеодно буде неюзабельне.

Сайт мій. І дані по високовольтних мережі на 90% по країні моя робота. Тому я твої мінорні лінії і вважаю утопічною "роботою"
olehz (2022-01-13 21:10:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184939088/history - тут тега дійсно не було. ладно, проїхали. загалом, для ТП - minor_distribution, для решти або пусте, або щось інше. (іноді важко градацію зробити. наприклад ПС Укрзалізниці юзаються не лише як тягові)
avinet_ua (2022-01-13 21:30:10+00:00): >Бо ти схем не маєш
так їх ніхто не має)

>мінорні лінії наносиш як високовольтні
було трохи

> при чому рандомно їх зєднюєш часто нелогічно і наносиш їх зигзагами кривими і сегментами
іноді я не можу розв"язку чітко побачити і з"єдную так, як робили за совка - підстанції лінії мали в різні боки задля забезпечення безперебійності. як стовпи стоять, так і малюю

>(бо їх тупо не видно часто 
якщо кілька провайдерів мап взяти + гугл стріт в"ю, то в більшості випадків можна побачити

про УЗ знаю, за совка проектувалося, все державне було і тому і на потяги і на села лінії кидалися

а сайт в реальному часі вантажить дані із ОСМ? чи є кеш? сайт цікавий, от тільки логотипи рандомно показує на одну і ту ж точку, якщо її відкрити кілька разів
olehz (2022-01-13 22:25:14+00:00): нащо в реальному часі його оновляти, якщо і так всі дані майже є? за останній рік юзери додали лише кілька нових ПС і одну лінію, а от наламали куди більше, тому перед апдейтом я валідую і правлю (якраз вчора був). на рахунок сайту знаю, то просто стара гамно-демка.
wkdgs (2022-01-03 08:31:33+00:00): Hi,

die Warnung wird angezeigt, weil die eingezeichneten Wege nicht mit dem Straßennetz verbunden sind. Ein Navi wüsste z.B. nicht wie es diese Wege erreichen kann.

Ich denke du kannst die Warnung hier ignorieren. Alternativ kannst du auch die Wege mit dem südlichen Zufahrtsweg verbinden. Dann würde die Warnung nicht mehr angezeigt werden.

Ich würde noch den Tag "office=	educational_institution" ändern. Der ist eher für tatsächliche Bürogebäude gedacht. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Deducational_institution)

Da es, soweit ich weiß, noch kein allgemein akzeptiertes Tagging-Schema für Verkehrskindergärten gibt, würde ich stattdessen einfach "leisure=playground" verwenden.

Auch "highway=living_street" passt aus meiner Sicht nicht so ganz. Das ist eher für ausgeschilderte Spielstraßen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street). Eine passende Alternative habe ich hier aber nicht. Vielleicht einfach "highway=path"?

Gruß
winkeldings
walking_daily (2023-02-08 09:10:25+00:00): Fantastic addition of these abandoned railways! Thank you! Which OS 1:25 map did you use?
aceman444 (2025-02-08 14:22:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/179743531 ma 2km, a nema po celej dlzke betonove panely. 
To tvrdi aj autor https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157117371
Skuste davat pozor. Ale to uz Vam asi zbytocne nieco pisat, vy si nahodne rubete Slovensko ako sa Vam zachce.
danieldegroot2 (2021-12-27 22:17:42+00:00): Most if not all conflicts should have been resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115445519
Sorry for any inconvenience.
DaveF (2021-12-29 10:52:02+00:00): Hi
All GB railway stations are already mapped as nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255857557
If the building is still used for railway purposes it should be mapped as building=train_station
DaveF (2021-12-29 11:04:56+00:00): Hi
How many operating platforms does Bridge of Dun have? The wiki says three. If trains stop at those platforms the track shouldn't be 'yard' or 'siding'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700124421#map=17/56.71850/-2.55079
user_11115677 (2021-12-29 20:43:18+00:00): Hi, please do not confuse the terms yard and siding used in Britain with international standards. Only continuous route tracks should be tagged with usage=main/branch. Tracks (mostly secured by signalling) that branch off from the continuous route track(s) are service=siding even when they are platform tracks. Branching tracks without signalling security usually are service=yard. If the northern stump track is used for descents, however, service=siding may be correct. Your comment on the station building is also correct. Kind regards
DaveF (2021-12-30 02:36:20+00:00): Hi
The object is in Britain. 

By 'international' do you mean the half a dozen German rail enthusiasts?

Where a single main line track splits to serve multiple platforms, the tracks are still continuous & main line. They are equal in usage & importance.
user_11115677 (2021-12-30 09:13:11+00:00): Thanks I fixed that
iandees (2021-12-27 23:13:09+00:00): Hi! What was the source of this data? It looks pretty comprehensive.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115446264
sannkc (2021-12-28 02:53:32+00:00): Bing aerial imagery, as noted in the changeset tags.
iandees (2021-12-28 03:10:23+00:00): Ah, so you're systematically scrolling through the whole city looking for rooftop solar?
sannkc (2021-12-28 04:07:01+00:00): Yeah, pretty much.  I'm not sure how systematic it is.  I'm going from area to area, but not quite on a street-by-street or house-to-house level.  So I may miss some areas.  I'm mostly adding what I can spot as I zoom in and searching for building types (commercial, industrial, institutional, apartment buildings) that seem most likely to have a larger solar installation. For instance, I'm finding that a lot of the public schools in Minneapolis have solar, so I give them a little extra attention as I move around.  If I happen to see a smaller residential installation on a nearby house, I usually go ahead and add it in, but I'm not aiming to find every house with rooftop solar.  Aside from adding solar, the only other changes I'm making are to add or fine-tune the buildings involved, if needed.   Hope that makes sense!
iandees (2021-12-28 14:26:07+00:00): Interesting, thanks for sharing. I'm impressed with your thoroughness. Keep up the good work!
MxxCon (2021-12-28 00:22:54+00:00): Most of the deletions here are needless extra nodes on straight lines or overlapping nodes on corners. Seems to be artifact of the original data import.
ZLima12 (2022-03-31 03:56:09+00:00): Why did you change `operator` to `Worchester County` on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10039511 ?
ZLima12 (2022-03-31 03:59:41+00:00): Something fishy seems to be happening with this; I've seen several mappers all make this change.
MxxCon (2022-03-31 04:04:52+00:00): iD prompted to update these tags based on its template.. or at least it did at the time when I was editing it.
ZLima12 (2022-03-31 04:07:57+00:00): That's certainly an issue. Not too familiar with iD these days, but I'll look into this.
MxxCon (2022-03-31 04:11:06+00:00): I believe it's coming from https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/main/data/transit/route/bus.json#L1370
ZLima12 (2022-03-31 04:25:59+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119140030
MxxCon (2022-03-31 04:30:17+00:00): It needs to be updated in the NSI template too otherwise the next person fixing such warning will clubber your changes.
ZLima12 (2022-03-31 04:37:45+00:00): https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/6390
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-12-28 22:40:51+00:00): a sua edição na praça duque de saldanha destruiu ediçoes anteriores, passeios sem qualquer barreira fisica não se dividem por serem de superficies diferentes, micromapping sem critério é errado, cumprimentos
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-12-28 22:52:39+00:00): normas de como mapear passeios https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation
Manuel Banza (2021-12-29 08:34:35+00:00): Bom dia,
O detalhe e informação a nível de passeio em Lisboa aqui no OSM é ainda bastante escassa. O que estou a tentar é mapear Lisboa pela sua acessibilidade pedonal. A razão de dividir é porque o material que é feito o passeio é completamente diferente, para uma pessoa com mobilidade reduzida interessa saber quais os locais que não são calçada mas sim placa de cimento. Dai estar a dividir e medir a largura de cada tipo de passeio. Esta informação é relevante para surgirem outras ferramentas que poderão servir a população com mobilidade reduzido ou mais idosas. Creio que nestes casos em que houve intervenção no passeio seria benéfico começar-se a ter a informação detalhada
Cumprimentos
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-12-29 23:24:51+00:00): Aconselho que entres no grupo oficial da comunidade portuguesa para discussão mais detalhada sobre esse assunto em: https://t.me/OSMPortugal
aceman444 (2022-02-27 01:24:29+00:00): Zdravim, preco znacite zatial neplatne nazvy ulic? Az ked to vyda Bratislava vo VZN tak sa tie ulice tak budu volat.
Dajte to zatial max. ako proposed:name= . Dakujem
aceman444 (2022-02-27 09:33:23+00:00): Aha, ten material vyzera ako odhlasovany mestom. Ale nema cislo VZN a nie je zverejneny na https://bratislava.sk/sk/legislativa-mesta . Tak mozno to uz je platne.
literan (2021-12-29 18:29:51+00:00): субъективное понятие (например, здесь https://wikitravel.org/ru/%D0%A6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F у нее состав другой), не верифицируемо

так как вы ни когда не отвечаете на комментарии, удалю сразу.
mavl (2022-06-26 13:56:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это тестовый комментарий для проверки связи.  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-28 00:51:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113316313, 113326008, 113326292, 113326551, 113327203.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-28 12:05:51+00:00): There are a few 50/50 calls in here.  For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15252260/history might be "ground" or "gravel".
Lee Carré (2021-12-30 19:54:28+00:00): > might be "ground" or "gravel"

Or grass. I've seen (surveyed) a few of those.

In any case: surface=unpaved ? Valid value while also being (likely) accurate. StreetComplete will then ask for a more specific value (which covers the possibility that it is actually paved).
marczoutendijk (2023-01-27 14:21:57+00:00): And I consider unpaved3 a typo for unpaved!
SomeoneElse (2023-01-27 14:26:34+00:00): @marczoutendijk well, it depends on the context of course.  If a mapper has been tagging highways as paved or unpaved, then an occasional unpaved3 is likely a typo.  If they're just entering out of context tag keys and values, no so much.
dreua (2024-01-03 20:05:06+00:00): Hallo,
ich wurde von Streetcomplete gefragt ob dieser POI noch existiert, konnte vor Ort keinen Hinweis darauf finden. Laut Impressum der Website stimmt die Hausnummer auch nicht, sollte nr. 16. sein. Ist hier tatsächlich etwas relevantes vor Ort oder ist das nur die Heimadresse von einem Vorstandsmitglied? (Hab aber vielleicht einfach am falschen Haus gesucht.)
dreua (2024-01-04 20:56:48+00:00): Hab sie bei nr. 16 gefunden und verschoben
Erik_ (2024-01-05 18:09:30+00:00): top, danke!
MxxCon (2021-12-28 00:31:14+00:00): Most of the deletions and modifications are from deleting needless nodes on straight lines or corners. Appears to be artifact from the original data import.
MarcoR (2022-01-02 22:01:03+00:00): Ciao!
Ho controllato il tuo gruppo di modifiche e non ho trovato alcun errore.
Continua così ;)

A presto e buon anno,
Marco.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-01 01:02:36+00:00): Reverted route deactivations (plus others you've tagged as such). Better not reflect very unpredictable route closure due to typhoon or quarantine, and those don't often get updated.
DP24PH (2022-01-01 04:17:07+00:00): Unfortunately, according to ground sources from residents of Surigao Del Norte, Sison got into post-typhoon landslide where land travels got tricky and dangerous at anytime, plus Surigao City is still yet to restore power (requires further mapping collaboration with NGCP, Surneco). This will eventually disrupt land travel from SRITT to Davao City, and it has to be mapped as suspended until Philtranco announced their restored state.
DP24PH (2022-01-01 04:23:19+00:00): Likewise, I would like to apologize for my oversight in routing relations scheme wherein the super relation have not activated while the Luzon, Eastern Visayas leg are activated.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-01 09:06:29+00:00): I can't understand clearly what you want to say, but again, do away with your habit here to map every closure. You're saying SRIT-Davao is closed until further notice, which is not clear, and in short, unpredictable. I'm OK with a long-term closure with known end date, e.g. road under reconstruction, though it may not always be the case.
nevw (2021-12-28 10:28:29+00:00): Thanks for fixing this Warin.
Nevw
Warin61 (2021-12-28 11:33:26+00:00): I've done the same on a few of these 'touching ring' things. 
I understand it is difficult for computers to recognize things humans understand with little thought... pitty about that.
redd (2022-01-09 17:37:18+00:00): Hi zeddat,
Willkommen (zurück) als aktiver OpenStreetMap-Kartograph! Gerne kannst du deine Changesets auch etwas kleiner und mit besserer Beschreibung verfassen. 
Vielen Dank und Schöne Grüße,
redd
andi9876 (2023-02-22 08:58:47+00:00): Hi,
I see you added lots of restriction. Some are 'from' 'via' 'to' into the same way. What it means?
I guess many restrictions you added are unuseful. I feel the routing navigation in Phnom Penh is since around one year horrible. Strange detours are displayed. I use OsmAnd (OpenStreetMap Automated Navigation Directions).
Andi.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13603604#map=19/11.53443/104.92392

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
_varman_ (2023-02-23 01:57:46+00:00): Hi Andi,
This has no u-turn signs posted. The restrictions I added are intended to reflect this.
If you think the restrictions are implemented incorrectly, you are welcome to resolve them, but I do not think the restrictions should be removed for the benefit of tuk tuks making illegal and dangerous u-turns.
Cheers
andi9876 (2023-02-23 02:39:43+00:00): Tuk Tuks? They doing what they like. 100% sure they don't care about OSM restrictions.

Wiki says:
Don't map turn restrictions that are the default for a given jurisdiction and are not signed. 

...where using turn restrictions will require hundreds or thousands of restrictions and micro-segmentation of all roads which in turn make editing data hard.

Translated from German Wiki:
Only turning restrictions that result from local signage or road markings are to be recorded!  It is not a mapper's job to decide whether a vehicle is actually capable of turning at an intersection/junction.  Turning may be possible for a car but impossible for a truck.  For a cyclist, on the other hand, the question does not arise at all.  Therefore, only the router can decide based on its default values.
 It is neither necessary nor desirable to place a turn restriction at an intersection with a one-way street, even if there is a sign there.  The restriction for the router results from the one-way rule.

Maybe helpful:
https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/implicit-restrictions/

Greetings.
_varman_ (2023-02-23 03:12:29+00:00): Hi Andi,
Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear. This intersection explicitly has "No U-Turn" signs posted for the north and south bound routes of Monivong. 
If you believe that my edits are incorrect, you are welcome to update the restrictions.
andi9876 (2023-02-23 07:34:30+00:00): Please check all restrictions you added in Phnom Penh and edit if necessary. Better is to add only restrictions if really necessary. Some I edited or deleted already in the past.
Greetings, Andi.
Dimacn (2021-12-28 10:57:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем вы нарисовали новые дороги рядом и параллельно уже существующим? И с некорректным статусом.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-08 17:51:52+00:00): Hello,
On https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9101645120 you've changed "locker=luggage" (which makes sense) to "locked=luggage" (which doesn't).
What actually is this?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-05-08 17:52:18+00:00): Hallo,
Auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9101645120 haben Sie "locker=luggage" (was sinnvoll ist) in "locked=luggage" geändert (was nicht der Fall ist).
Was ist das eigentlich?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Andy
ovruni (2021-12-28 05:13:06+00:00): Hola Fer25, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado varias vías por el Rímac y se ha indicado que se ha utilizado la imagen de Bing, sin embargo desde esa imagen aérea no se divisan varias de esas vías. ¿Cual es la fuente que se ha utilizado?
Saludos
Fer25 (2021-12-28 23:05:40+00:00): Lo que pasa que ya hace un tiempo había pasado por ahí y vi que estaban construyendo la prolongación, y estaba viendo Google Earth que está con imágenes del 3 de noviembre de este año y ya esta bastante avanzado. Me guíe de eso, no se si está bien
ovruni (2021-12-28 23:30:37+00:00): Hola, no se pueden utilizar servicios de Google para agregar datos en OpenStreetMap, debido a un tema de derechos de autor. Puedes encontrar mayor información en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Preguntas_frecuentes#.C2.BFY_por_qu.C3.A9_no_utilizo_Google_Maps_para_mis_datos.3F
Saludos
Fer25 (2021-12-29 00:44:10+00:00): hum, no sabía de eso, en ese caso, tengo que esperar que Bing actualice el mapa o hay otro modo de justificar la nueva vía?
ovruni (2021-12-29 04:52:06+00:00): Hola
En OSM existen diferentes imágenes aéreas, las cuales se ven dentro de las opciones de fondo [0] en iD. También puedes generar vistas de calles y subirlas en Mapillary o Kartaview, los cuales permiten ser usados desde las capas de fotos en iD.
Saludos
[0] https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
archpdx (2021-12-28 03:33:27+00:00): Hi,
What source did you use to add this power line? It looks like you used Bing imagery but this power line isn't visible when looking at the imagery.
JesseFTW (2022-01-18 14:40:12+00:00): Given the lack of response, and the oddity of this addition, I'm going to remove it. Feel free to re-add it with a source.
SethY861 (2022-01-13 14:58:11+00:00): What is your justification for removing Glassford Hill Road as a primary through Prescott Valley. It serves as the fastest way north-south across Prescott Valley and provides access from AZ69 to AZ89A. There is a reason the city and state continue to pour funds into expanding and widening Glassford Hill Road.
they (2022-01-13 20:13:01+00:00): I must have been thinking that it didn't continue as a primary road past the junctions of AZ 69 and AZ 89A, so it really only served neighborhoods in Prescott Valley.  Since you seem to have more local knowledge of the Prescott area, and it sounds like the road provides connectivity to more than the neighborhoods along it, I will go ahead and change it back to primary.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-15 20:52:54+00:00): Hello,
While looking for something else (of course!) I spotted "tag=NEW" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016028864/history
Was that deliberate, and if so, what does it mean?
Best Regards,
Andy
Mashin (2022-03-16 05:15:41+00:00): Good catch, thanks!
Those were leftover from one of our conflation strategy.
archie (2021-12-28 07:50:48+00:00): Din första byggnad? Det var på tiden! :-) Tack för alla dina värdefulla rättelser och kompletteringar avseende gatu- och vägnamn hittills!
Stefan8988 (2021-12-28 11:29:04+00:00): Tack

Den här finns fortfarande kvar att åtgärda, om du har lust.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2593343
mavl (2021-12-29 15:55:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет в деревне Большие Ярки стадион. Раньше там не было стадиона и вряд ли он там появится. В OpenSreetMap под стадионом понимается именно большой стадион, а не спортивная площадка. В этой деревне на спутниковом снимке видна спортивная площадка.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure%3Dstadium
aixbrick (2021-12-28 09:04:00+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
du hast hier den Haupttag "highway" gelöscht, wodurch das jetzt keine Straße mehr ist.
Ergänze bitte wieder "highway=track" (so war es ursprünglich) und lösche stattdessen "construction=primary".
Gruß
aixbrick (2021-12-28 12:42:02+00:00): Danke fürs Ergänzen. Ich habe das "construction" noch gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115469102.
SPQRobin (2022-04-17 19:32:15+00:00): This bike path temporarily does NOT exist while the car parking is under construction. Hence why I remove it, I will remove it again now.
felipeeugenio (2021-12-28 16:49:10+00:00): Hola JOsé. Si los locales dejan de existir por favor no borrar la numeración junto con los datos del local. AHora voy a tener que rehacer todo eso.

y por favor no borres tags sin saber lo que son. En el molino borraste todos los tags que si corresponden para agregar uno de edificio, siendo que no es un edificio.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115455794
felipeeugenio (2021-12-28 16:50:53+00:00): Una duda: no se puede circular ya delante del centro cultural? porque borraste la calle.
saludos
One_Jose16 (2021-12-28 17:03:16+00:00): Hola, la farmacia popular fue un punto q yo agregué hace algunos años. ahora se trasladó a una galeria al lado del rodoviario en calle Matta (#1315).  no borre ningun punto con direcciones, si habia creado uno con el cuartel de bomberos y el liceo, despues encontre más fácil copiar uno de la misma calle y cambiar solo la numeración. El molino estaba como edificio, siendo q estaba encerrando el terreno completo cuando la construcción es menor.
One_Jose16 (2021-12-28 17:07:56+00:00): la calle del centro Cultural (F Bilbao) la estan pavimentando, antes se usaba de la carpeta que quedó del regimiento. y estan haciendo un acceso a la salida del puente para saltarse el semáforo. por ahora no se puede transitar y tampoco ha salido la ordenanza del sentido de la calle. Matta es bidereccional, pero F Bilbao en esa esquina es unidereccional hacia calle O´Higgins. https://fb.watch/aa-nw_GmiD/  saludos, te puedo mandar fotos por telegram. Si esta incorrecto seria de ayuda aclararlo.
felipeeugenio (2021-12-28 17:11:02+00:00): ok, dejé la calle en construcción unida.

Respecto del molino, el tag building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo. Ya lo arreglé. gracias por su tiempo. saludos
felipeeugenio (2021-12-28 17:12:52+00:00): Bilbao ya está con un solo sentido el norte de la plaza. No sé si fue usted o alguien más, pero entiendo que lo que describe es lo mismo que hay en OSM. gracias.
Bienvenido si se quiere unir al chat de la comunidad en Telegram.
saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
NiLaKol (2022-01-08 09:13:01+00:00): Die mit diesem CS gelöschten Wege habe ich wiederhergestellt und mit disused: oder access Tag versehen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115901771
Kovoschiz (2021-12-28 10:26:28+00:00): Please check that `=secondary` should be important across the district.
Kovoschiz (2021-12-28 10:28:21+00:00): `=unclassified` means a minor distributor road, that's not as important to a part of the district as `=tertiary`. It's not categorized, which would be `highway=road`.