piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-02-28 13:38:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
you regularly map buildings as landuse =residential. The correct tag is building=yes.... Please pay attention to that in subsequent mappings.
Best regards
Frans S (2022-02-28 13:49:25+00:00): Hi. Another point. 
The round buildings you map seem a bit handmade to me.
The easiest way to map a round hust in iDeditor is to draw a triangle over the borders of the hut and, still selected push on the O button. 
When you have to map many idential huts, just copy one , move your mousepointer over the centre of the next hut and past it.
Best regards
pitfire (2022-02-28 07:19:27+00:00): Hallo odna,
bei allem Wohlwollen für zwei Wege sind das keine Einbahnstraßen. Der letzte Punkt der Zufahrt ist nicht die Tiefgarage. Jetzt gibt es die Tiefgarage 2mal. Mangelnde Kenntnis der tatsächlichen Tiefgaragen Umrisse bevorzuge ich den Punkt. 
End-Node der Zufahrt ist (amenity=parking_entrance / parking=underground/ access=*)
macaddr (2022-03-05 14:19:05+00:00): Cześć, jeśli możesz to opisuj proszę zmiany. To wszystkim ułatwi pracę :)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-28 21:49:23+00:00): The correct tag for parking lots is amenity=parking
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117862861
praeteritum (2022-07-04 03:52:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123169931.
Jrachi (2022-12-13 15:43:51+00:00): Ciao.
La cai_scale si applica solo ai percorsi (relazioni) non ai sentieri.
Forse volevi usare la sac_scale?
MauroL (2022-12-15 17:31:38+00:00): Ciao, effettivamente ho commesso l'errore, Sono il mappatore CAI della sezione di Porretta Terme. Quel tratto di sentiero è stato sistemato un anno fa circa per evitare il passaggio su strada statale. Grazie per l'aiuto.
praeteritum (2022-07-04 03:47:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123169841.
gscholz (2022-02-27 06:55:59+00:00): Hi Josuer,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-110.34749&lat=24.09058&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117863453

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Josuer (2022-02-28 23:49:08+00:00): Hi Guido,
Thank you!

I already fixed it!
best,
 Josuer
SomeoneElse (2022-02-27 10:07:46+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've added 21516 nodes to the relation 13852718 .  Presumably this was in error.  Do you need help fixing it?
Best Regards,
Andy
pmckay419 (2022-02-27 15:30:02+00:00): Oh, sorry did I do that wrong? I'm new to using JOSM to create large relations and it gave me a vague error about that but I wasn't sure what the issue was so I ignored it. Grateful for any help fixing that.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-27 15:36:11+00:00): I suspect that you added the ways, and the relation, and then added _everything_ to the relation (rather than just the ways).
Everyone does that at least once :)
I'll have a look in more detail later.
I also mentioned it at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1645956747743569 (which you can get to via https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ if not already there), so someone may beat me to fixing it.
pmckay419 (2022-02-27 16:34:07+00:00): Ah ok, so to fix it I would need to remove the nodes from the relation and just have the ways? I'll try to fix that later today if no one else does it first.
praeteritum (2022-07-04 03:39:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123169807.
sekai128 (2022-06-06 16:49:47+00:00): Zijn way/1038290953 en way/508639773 correct getagt als `highway=residential`? er staan namelijk geen huizen langs deze weg en volgens mijn is dat waar die tag voor bedoeld is.
user_10241830 (2022-02-25 23:18:59+00:00): Hallo,

der Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035211195 sollte wohl so nicht hochgeladen werden, oder?
surveyor54 (2022-03-08 07:45:55+00:00): Hi,
da gebe ich dir recht. Ist mir irgendwie durchgerutscht.

Entschuldige, dass ich mich jetzt erst melde, ich werde über Diskussionen z. Zt. per Mail nicht benachrichtigt.
Ich weiß auch nicht an was das liegt.
Andre68 (2022-02-26 08:57:38+00:00): Please learn that land MUST be on left hand side for coastlines.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
highflyer74 (2022-03-02 06:00:53+00:00): Moin!

Du nutzt in letzter Zeit vermehrt die halbautomatische "Problemkorrektur" des Editors iD und änderst blind und großflächig Daten. Bitte höre damit auf.

Das hat mehrere Gründe:

- diese Funktion in iD führt Änderungen durch, die nicht immer korrekt sind.

- durch die Änderungen wird eine falsche "Aktualität" der geänderten Daten suggeriert. So kann es vorkommen, da einige der Objekte in der Realität überhaupt nicht mehr existieren.

- wir editieren in OSM nicht großflächig irgendwelche Daten, ohne diese nicht vorher überprüft zu haben.

Bitte lies Dir dazu folgendes durch:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Sei mir nicht böse, aber ich werde Deine Änderungen aus den oben genannten Gründen wieder zurücksetzen, da sie mehr schaden, als nützen. Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern direkt hier im Änderungssatz. Danke Dir!
pitfire (2022-02-28 10:17:39+00:00): Hallo odna,
Weg: 1035201247 mit "surface ground mit tracktype grade1" passt nicht zusammen.
user_5359 (2022-02-26 05:20:40+00:00): Hello! Have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452702792/history. I don't think the tag combination is compatible.
denomination=christian
religion=multifaith
Please also have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:religion=multifaith?uselang=de.
In my opinion, religkon=christian would be sufficient.

Olá! veja em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452702792/history. Não me parece que a combinação de etiquetas seja compatível.
denominação=cristão
religião=multifídea
Por favor, dêem também uma vista de olhos em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:religion=multifaith?uselang=de.
Na minha opinião, religkon=christian seria suficiente.
Queiròz_Anderssen10 (2022-02-26 14:18:48+00:00): Boa Tarde, nobre colaborador OSM-DE, eu coloquei o cemitério particular privado denominado como Cemitério "Campo da Paz", na categoria da filosofia de religião "cristão", de diferentes denominações dentro desta vertente. Já visitei duas vezes este local e me lembro como havia capela mortuária da Igreja Católica Romana, cultos protestantes, evangélicos, como também há celebrações de outras matrizes afro religiosas, como o candomblé e outros...! Obrigado pela indagação e estamos aí, qualquer coisa!
user_5359 (2022-02-26 14:33:48+00:00): Favor observar que o valor cristão não é um valor padrão para denominação, mas para religião. Talvez seja melhor definir uma religião=nenhuma do que o valor escolhido (e possivelmente também uma descrição=nenhuma).
BCNorwich (2022-02-27 10:07:32+00:00): Hi, Please take a look here at a lot of duplicated sections of highway that you've mapped:- https://tinyurl.com/2hv277by

Could you please remedy these duplications? Also remove the fiction names from the driveways. The footpaths don't usually have individual formal names so unless there are verifiable formal footpath names ought also be removed. 

The OSM tag leisure=garden refers to all types of gardens, are these ones publicly accessible? If not they should be tagged access=private.

There are several instances where you've tagged a house address with the number in the addr:housename= tag and the name=tag, an example is Way: 88 (1031032473) the house number should only be in the addr:housenumber= tag.

I hope you can remedy these problems, if you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
CloCkWeRX (2022-02-27 05:58:32+00:00): Hi, thanks for fleshing out some detail :)

I've also linked in your wikipedia page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwood_International_High_School
InsertUser (2022-02-26 11:24:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please save between editing in widely spaced areas, the large bounding box can end up with lots of people in between getting notified about and edit.
user_5359 (2022-02-26 14:52:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833464653. What is the meaning of the tag m = no?
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:46+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113220813, 113308031, 113308064, 113353315, 114204551, 114209482, 114237037, 114237107, 114237532, 114346100, 114346415, 114346627, 114346766, 114347165, 114347269, 114347404, 114347481, 114989088, 115142317, 115142368, 115143303, 115143417, 115237524, 115286834, 116210215, 116210938, 116211074, 116211776, 116309752, 116310616, 116314662, 116314771, 116408684, 116603154, 116603854, 116636882, 116636914, 116638637, 116639715, 116640023, 116640574, 116641058, 116641115, 116641225, 116641609, 116641983, 116642558, 116642596, 116642677, 116678841, 116678883, 116678963, 116679053, 116679482, 116679749, 116679932, 116680051, 116686865, 116687178, 116687313, 116687365, 116687446, 116687609, 116687794, 116687891, 116688151, 116688222, 116688312, 116688410, 116729802, 116799976, 116808393, 116808638, 116809180, 116811407, 116813186, 116813248, 116813316, 116813516, 116838017, 116838822, 116838916, 116839127, 116839399, 116839569, 116839694, 116839815, 116839917, 116839932, 116840680, 116841356, 116842110, 116842411, 116842571, 116842662, 116842866, 116842887, 116842997, 116843240, 116843751, 116843947, 116844239, 116846093, 116846108, 116846166, 116846341, 116846349, 116846457, 116846474, 116846497, 116846553, 116846611, 116846826, 116883136, 116883289, 116883749, 116883988, 116889859, 116889966, 116890157, 116890245, 116890550, 116939434, 116941520, 116981100, 116981901, 116981930, 116981965, 116982086, 116982116, 116982240, 116982974, 116983589, 116983620, 116983705, 116983819, 116983926, 116983956, 116986538, 116986797, 116986814, 116986853, 116986894, 116987092, 116987230, 116987274, 117021708, 117023112, 117023534, 117107862, 117138915, 117540865, 117590909, 117590972, 117590995, 117591060, 117749489.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-26 01:15:21+00:00): Also a flood prone bit off Sutton Road
alyaa_hossam (2022-02-28 12:25:50+00:00): Hello Casablanca MG,
Please be aware that your edits vandalized OpenStreetMap Data, Also you added many ways not matching any satellite images.
Examples:-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035234816
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035234817
Please review and revert your edits and keep OpenStreetMap data much better.
Regards,
alyaa_hossam
GITNE (2023-02-06 12:55:16+00:00): Please, DO NOT create loop ways in cul-de-sacs. Use `highway=turning_loop` instead if you want to be more specific about the type of the cul-de-sac.
wireguy (2022-02-26 14:16:57+00:00): improving way 799002325, Essex has broken the relations: relation 11059425 Essex and relation 11059424 Deep River.   Can you look into correcting?
Mashin (2022-02-26 15:57:56+00:00): fixed it.
CloCkWeRX (2022-02-27 05:33:11+00:00): Ah, thanks!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-02 22:22:58+00:00): It appears you accidentally tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035239803 as a stream
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117867855
Brian@Brea (2022-03-02 23:56:53+00:00): I think it’s was supposed to be natural=water. I will fix it when I get a chance. Thanks for pointing out the mistake.
ivanbranco (2022-02-27 09:50:08+00:00): Hi Digital Manager,

please use valid tags.

FAMILIA HERNANDEZ=ZORAIDA, JULIO, NELLY, CELIS, ANAIDA, ISNALDA
and
area=TERRENO

are not valid tags.

Also don't use capslock, name=PARCELAMIENTO ELINA HERNANDEZ should be name=Parcelamiento Elina Hernandez

Could you fix the elements you added please?
user_5359 (2022-03-08 08:14:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please also remove all private information about the owner!
tastrax (2022-02-28 06:01:59+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
pantufla (2023-01-04 23:35:13+00:00): Hola, este tipo de cambios no siguen las normas de OSM
Giuseppe Salvador (2022-02-26 03:31:48+00:00): Hay un video reciente al respecto: https://youtu.be/_N7zFKBiVyg
user_5359 (2022-02-26 12:20:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98270448 (one of three ways). What is the meaning of the tag Bible = Prophecy?
Dr Kludge (2022-02-27 01:47:19+00:00): Woot! Woot!  I looked through my YouTube play list that included "Salty Cracker" channel videos, NoFap retention videos, "J Bravo" investment channel videos.  It must be the time/calendar related videos.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elN-xA25aaQ 
 I moved all my investments to local bond investments because we are nearing the end of a Shemitah year.  I moved the investments well before the seven year stock crash cycle and the Russian invasion of Ukraine.   Next up the Chinese invasion of Taiwan? 
 I will fix those.   I have no idea how those tags made it to the ways.
Dr Kludge (2022-02-27 01:56:09+00:00): In my best J Bravo, "que the fire".  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iCHffmrrIE   Those issues have been fixed.
λnko (2022-02-26 04:34:21+00:00): 请注意！按照OSMWiki中的规定，切入周遭土地的路径要标识为“路堑(即cutting=yes)”。隧道口与地面之间的路径符合此规定
mavl (2022-02-27 10:24:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет населённый пункт с названием "Жанажол". Такого населённого пункта в Тюменской области нет. В этом можно убедиться, прочитав закон Тюменской области № 263. Напишите, пожалуйста, каким источником данных вы пользовались при добавлении этого населённого пункта?
shanhulittle (2022-02-26 13:12:31+00:00): 不清楚您大规模删除建筑的原因是什么，它们大部分并不是低劣的标注。这属于破坏行为！
λnko (2022-02-26 04:33:34+00:00): 请注意！按照OSMWiki中的规定，切入周遭土地的路径要标识为“路堑(即cutting=yes)”。隧道口与地面之间的路径符合此规定
Tom Brennan (2023-01-19 21:25:12+00:00): Hi - do these paths actually exist on the ground? Just wondering if they should be on the map or not.
waratah65 (2023-01-20 01:06:29+00:00): Hi Tom, Yes - in Nov 2021. Hughes is faint, the other 2 are better. The rest of the traverse is non-existent.
Emilius123 (2022-02-26 15:12:05+00:00): most prolific mapper in washington state sucks at wordle, it seems?
Natfoot (2022-02-27 03:17:08+00:00): is that a personal attack? I was tired and hit paste thinking it was the last thing I wrote for save but instead was the that. I hit save before I noticed.
Natfoot (2022-02-27 03:20:58+00:00): thanks for the comment on my edit. Please be carful about making negative comments about how people are.
Emilius123 (2022-02-27 16:25:09+00:00): Apologies, that was not meant as an insult.
osmviborg (2022-02-26 05:52:45+00:00): Please use 'SDFE aerial imagery' when mapping in DK. 'SDFE aerial imagery' are less than a year old.
aharvey (2022-02-26 06:59:53+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117869922
aharvey (2022-02-26 07:00:30+00:00): per https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2941525
aharvey (2022-02-26 06:49:44+00:00): Hey Graeme, the note was for the missing steps from the path here up to the lookout. I left a note until we can get a gps trace to map it. So I've reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117870564 and will re-open the note. Mapillary also shows no steps on the cyclepath.
Fizzie-DWG (2022-02-26 06:59:02+00:00): Must be going too hard! I could swear I could see steps on that footpath!
Alex_457 (2022-03-06 18:43:35+00:00): Hi I think you forgot to reverse the ways at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030697932 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620134903. I cycle this path a lot and the direction is definitely opposite
Alex_457 (2022-03-06 18:51:27+00:00): Also going to have to check but I don't think any of these are explicitly oneway so should probably not have oneway tags
Alex_457 (2022-03-06 18:57:24+00:00): Meant to say"all" instead of "any"
Alex_457 (2022-03-08 13:58:10+00:00): I've reversed the ways for you
Alec Coates (2022-03-18 00:06:02+00:00): Ah thanks for that. As for the oneway-ness, they are definitely marked as if to indicate their use in this manner (complete with available crossing points). I'm not sure if there legally can be an explicitly one-way cycle path in the UK? But either way it is how are supposed to be used.
skquinn (2022-02-26 11:35:22+00:00): 1. The wiki article itself isn't really a source.
2. Why put all of these changes in one changeset? It's insane that the bounding box encompasses almost the entire continental US and most of Cuba and Mexico.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-26 18:42:40+00:00): My impression was that related changes are fine to upload in larger changesets. I'll split it up next time.
user_5359 (2022-03-08 08:07:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149827997 (one of sixteen ways). Did you mean nysdot_ref instead of nsydot_ref?
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-26 09:18:33+00:00): 将version8回退到version7的工作位于：

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117873021
mueschel (2022-03-12 12:09:54+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of 'area' tags here? Is this the name of the sub-village?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9536429304
Shaun das Schaf (2022-02-26 18:59:37+00:00): Hallo Berna Bektas, willkommen bei OSM!

Was wolltest du mit deiner Änderung bezwecken? Du hast bei diesem Weg den "highway-track"-Tag entfernt, der diese Linie als Feldweg ausweist.

Dein Änderungssatzkommentar "sfs" ist leider auch alles andere als aufschlussreich.

Ich habe den entfernten Tag vorsorglich mal wieder hinzugefügt.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
ivanbranco (2022-02-27 10:14:13+00:00): Hi Chetan,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035282563

landuse=Agriculture is not a valid tag. You can use landuse=farmland

Note that OSM tags and values don't use upper-case letters.

You can use the Wiki to find the more common tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Alanduse
喵耳引力波 (2022-03-01 04:13:07+00:00): 朋友你好，OSM是一个公开的数据库，因此这部分含有姓名的隐私数据是不适宜向所有人公开的，您的朋友可能也不喜欢被这样向全世界被公示。我们已移除这些姓名。

此外，您的变更集范围过大，覆盖了大半个中国，建议您未来可以减小一下。

谢谢~！祝生活愉快！
eggie (2022-02-26 08:27:08+00:00): Dag Angelo...  De doorsteek zal niet werken als die geen verbinding in OSM heeft met die bypass van de A50. 

MVG
eggie
AngeloVGGM (2022-02-26 10:18:08+00:00): Dag eggie, ik heb wat aanpassingen doorgevoerd. Er stond nog een object 'doodlopend eind', deze heb ik verwijderd. Tevens veld- of bosweg toegevoegd wat aansluit op de A50. Hopelijk is het zo goed en conform richtlijnen.
Mvg,
Angelo
eggie (2022-02-26 10:26:20+00:00): Kreeg net een link van een Lachgast op de zoombijeenkomst
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hulpdiensten

Meedoen met de zoom kan via
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71852

Zie link
eggie (2022-02-26 10:27:35+00:00): Er wordt gewerkt aan een wikipagina voor de hulpdiensten.
abakus_uploader (2022-02-26 23:32:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
RicoElectrico (2022-02-27 15:43:52+00:00): Hej, poprawiłem ten adres: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845302867/history
km2bp (2023-04-12 18:50:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733174569/history 
Please don't remove my photos from the map.
I know the rules. I don't divide roads into sections anymore.
And I blur out car registration numbers
I understand that you use a different editor and clone bulk data imports. But please pay attention next time you're not destroying my work.
My effort in adding photos is best seen here on this map: http://openpoimap.org/?map=various&zoom=18&lat=59.11263&lon=10.10974&layers=B00FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFF  Regards km2bp
Allison P (2022-08-27 04:52:43+00:00): Thank you for the data, but proposed=yes is an example of a trolltag. Data consumers may not recognize the tag and think there is a real park there. The name is being used as a description, which is also incorrect. The feature should be tagged proposed:leisure=park and the current name should be changed to description.
Tindog (2022-08-27 08:10:47+00:00): Okay, I think I fixed it, I implemented your recommended changes.
Allison P (2022-08-27 14:49:11+00:00): Appreciated! It doesn't matter much, since it's not being displayed, but technically that name is still being used as a description. See the wiki for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Hope this helps.
user_5359 (2022-02-28 15:29:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9536580671. It seems to be a duplicate to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/939853697/history
osmviborg (2022-02-28 16:14:38+00:00): merged, ty
mosstreet (2022-02-26 20:32:28+00:00): Hello, explain the meaning of this line if the Ukrainian army is already surrendering and the line has long shifted, for example, a video with a diagram on the map
https://youtu.be/dfQhxku5o2A?t=110 All this is confirmed by published videos
ivanbranco (2022-02-27 09:46:43+00:00): Hi Chetan,

this looks like an import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13853839

There's a guideline to be followed to import stuff in OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Also please use meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Could you fix this elements with invalid tags that you added please?
user_5359 (2022-02-27 13:33:35+00:00): Revert change set because there no OSM keys.
user_5359 (2022-03-08 08:03:16+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/node/9536725617#map=19/48.86814/2.36425. What is the meaning of the tag Rassemblement du 26 février = 15h le 26 février
XimeX (2022-02-26 11:02:13+00:00): Hello,
your changeset comment was: "Added a driveway" but you only deleted the "maxspeed:type" entry.
Was this a mistake?
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-26 09:19:06+00:00): 将version8克隆的工作位于：

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117870806
datendelphin (2023-01-12 11:47:03+00:00): Dear BBMaper, 

I just stumbled upon this undiscussed import. It is correct that we can use the Siwss address dataset. I also recognize that Valais is direly lacking in addresses. But just carelessly dumping the dataset is still not acceptable. 

1. We want to connect it to the existing data. That means put it on the building outline if buildings are already mapped. Dumping them as nodes just doubles the work for no benefit
2. We want you to review it. There are addresses that are slightly outside a building. Or in the middle of the forest. Are there maybe house numbers for carports or sheds, which do not make sense to add.
3. You have already been told not to delete existing data https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/112428221. And you did it again! There is no excuse any more.

Why is there no Benefit of just dumping the data in OSM: Anyone is free to use that dataset. They can just import it themselves (and decide if they want it at all!) Drawbacks: Apart from the double work (delete node when moving address to the outline) this data would linger forever in OSM, with no one caring, rotting.

best regards
Michael
KVI0n (2022-02-26 10:42:57+00:00): + correct Added