piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aixbrick (2019-09-25 15:41:06+00:00): Danke.
Die Open.NRW-Daten stehen alle unter der Lizenz "Datenlizenz Deutschland - Namensnennung-Version 2.0", unabhängig was sie darstellen. Und diese Lizenz ist inkompatibel, weil OSM die Forderung der Namensnennung nicht so erfüllen kann, wie vorgesehen (sichtbar an den Daten).
Die bereits erfassten NSGs sind meist schon länger in OSM enthalten. Bis 2017 war z.B. die Nutzung der NRW-Geobasisdaten erlaubt. Außerdem gibt es noch weitere Möglichkeiten: Vor-Ort-Recherche (bei NSGs nicht wirklich praktikabel) oder auch öffentliche Bekanntmachungen. Mehr dazu hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Potential_Datasources.
Luzandro (2019-09-28 04:42:04+00:00): Du könntest es auf 2 getrennte POIs aufteilen.

Es gäbe auch noch post_office:type=post_partner aber das hat offenbar auch keinen Einfluss darauf, was beim Standard-Stil bevorzugt gerendert wird.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:post_office:type
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74897452
xenoodem (2019-09-28 09:19:37+00:00): Danke Luzandro für den Vorschlag. Ich habe das Trennen nicht gemacht, weil es dadurch nach 2 Shops aussieht. Meine Überlegung war, das jetzt so zu lassen, weil der Punkt in der Suche nach "GLS Jenbach"  oder "Paketshop Jenbach" aufgelistet wird. Ein Postamt ist es ja auch nicht wirklich.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74897452
BohdanKuts (2019-09-30 05:01:40+00:00): Доброго дня.
Вітаємо в OpenStreetMap!
Дозвольте поцікавитись, для чого були внесені ці зміни і чи розумієте Ви, що ці зміни включено в глобальну карту?
BohdanKuts (2019-09-30 05:04:27+00:00): Окрім того, лінія для річки Золота Липа утворила водний полігон і "залила" водою дороги - сумніваюсь, що саме цього Ви бажали досягти. Будь ласка, виправте усі помилки які були додані в цьому ченджсеті.
elgolfo (2019-09-25 09:58:41+00:00): Hi Andresen1108,
habe mir dein Changeset angeschaut, bin aber nicht richtig draus schlau geworden. 
Möchtest du da eine Sperrung eintragen oder entfernen?

Viele Grüße
Moritz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74897755
Andresen1108 (2019-09-25 10:25:01+00:00): Hallo Moritz,
eine Vollsperrung sollte eingetragen werden, komplette Fertigstellung erst etwa Mitte 2020. Bitte korrigieren falls unkorrekt. Danke.
Gruß Andresen
elgolfo (2019-09-25 12:07:33+00:00): Hi Andresen, 

ah alles klar. Mein Vorschlag  für die Baustelle ist:
highway=construction
construction=tertiary
opening_date=2020-07-01
note=Baustelle bis Mitte 2020, hier idealerweise ein Link zu einer Quelle

Im Wiki gibt es recht viele Inforamtionen zu den Tags[0][1][2].

Bei construction ist es so, dass construction den Wert bekommt, den die Strasse haben
wird/oder vor der Baumaßnahme hatte. In dem Fall also tertiary.

Du hattest dann noch aus lanes:backward=1 lanes:forward=1 gemacht. Das würde ich 
auch wieder ändern. 

Sehen kann man das alles super mit OSM Deep History[3] oder auch mit Achavi[4].
Ziel sollte sein, dass zum Schluss sich nur die Werte für highway und construction 
geändert haben (im Vergleich zur Version 8).

Falls du noch Fragen hast, kannst du dich gern melden.

Viele Grüße
Moritz

[0]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date
[2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:note
[3]: http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/167353809
[4]: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74897755
aseerel4c26 (2019-09-25 17:22:06+00:00): Willkommen! Was meinst du mit " Is there another field which covers the football field of the Phantoms?"? Ist dort auch ein Fußballfeld, welches noch nicht bei uns eingetragen ist? Im Luftbild sehe ich keines.
Letsch2 (2019-09-26 09:05:11+00:00): Hallo, auf dem Feld spielen auch die Wiesbaden Phantoms (American Football) Dazu wird nur ein Teil des Feldes genutzt. Werden Felder übereinander gelegt und damit als einzelne Objekte angelegt oder wird das in dasselbe Objekt eingetragen?
aseerel4c26 (2019-09-26 19:01:17+00:00): hmm, ich bin kein Spezialist in Sportanlagen... Meist ist ein Feld nur für eine Nutzung tauglich. Fußball, Basketball, ... Du könntest einfach mehrere Nutzungen übereinanderlegen, besser als gar nichts. 

Aber am besten gibst du mehrere Nutzungen mit ";" getrennt für das eine Spielfeld an. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmulti

Also nicht nur sport=baseball;softball wie du es aktuell https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146374283 getaggt hast,  sondern sport=baseball;softball;american_football

Wenn wichtig ist, dass für Football nur ein Teil des Feldes genutzt wird, dann würde ich wirklich einfach  ein neues Feld drüberlegen, welches als Nutzung nur American Football hat.
AndriesWijma (2020-05-30 20:35:13+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85992599
AndriesWijma (2020-05-30 20:33:47+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85992572
eggie (2019-09-25 09:56:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-25 10:02:14+00:00): Dag Yorick... 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


access=private stond al getagd en dat was genoeg.
Die andere tags kunnen er weer af. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-25 10:04:29+00:00): review.. In zo'n geval kun je ook vehicle=no taggen. Dan vang je alles in één keer.
foot=yes hoeft niet. dat is default. 
Gr egggie
YorickDix (2019-09-25 10:13:40+00:00): thnx Eggie
ik ga het aanpassen (proberen te)
eggie (2019-09-25 10:38:08+00:00): Oke.. probeer je in de verschillende verkeersdeelnemers te verplaatsen. Er komt bv een fietspad uit op de track vehicle-no  De vraag is dan klopt het dan wel?
Kijk ook welke borden (onderborden) er vooraan staan.
Elk verbod heeft natuurlijk consequenties. 
Succes,
Eggie
felipeeugenio (2019-09-25 19:36:41+00:00): Estimado
En el editor ID, con la letra Q, puede cuadrar las estructuras que dibuja.
saludos
xinaes (2019-09-25 11:12:47+00:00): I recently followed a route generated by cycle.travel, incorporating some of 254. I found that 254 was marked along the wrong roads at the Salisbury end, so set about amending the data as appropriate (so that other people hopefully wouldn't be lead up the grim section of road I had to endure).

As I edited, I was surprised to find that the appeared to be no relations at all relating to this route.  I have now added what I believe to be a correct set of such.  What confuses me now, is that when viewing the 'Cycle Map' layer outside of edit mode, I see the faulty version of the route displayed.

I don't understand where this data is coming from.  I suppose it may be that at some point an incorrect version was added, and then completely removed, but remains in some level of cache used in displaying the Cycle Map layer. Either that or I have misunderstood how that layer is generated.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-25 11:50:13+00:00): (prompted by comment at https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/62399/edit-cycle-map-layer ).

Hello,
I think that there might be a bit of duplication here.  NCN 254 seems to be in OSM as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/138421 , and a new relation has been added here as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10075430 ?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-09-25 11:59:37+00:00): (from followup comment) actually, as they follow different routes it's entirely correct to add a new relation.  You'll just now need to extend the new "254" relation so that it includes all of it and remove the ref "254" from the Wiltshire Cycleway.
xinaes (2019-09-25 12:00:22+00:00): Some sections of Wiltshire Cycleway are I believe wrongly tagged as "network: ncn, ref: 254", and this is where the error on the Cycle Map view originates.
xinaes (2019-09-25 12:05:02+00:00): (didn't notice previous comments before posting that last one)
I believe my new 254 relation does include all of it, and that as you say ref "254" should be removed from Wiltshire Cycleway. Also, network "ncn" is incorrect for Wiltshire Cycleway - I think indeed it may be a network unto itself, which happens to frequently intersect NCN routes. I'm less confident that I know how this should be specified.
xinaes (2019-09-25 12:15:15+00:00): Related https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74906816
Richard (2019-09-25 12:35:47+00:00): As I understand it, the Wiltshire Cycleway is NCN 254 for its whole circular length, excluding those parts which are coincident with other NCN routes (e.g. NCN 45). Certainly the Wiltshire Council and Sustrans websites think so, and the sections I've cycled (e.g. near Malmesbury) have been signposted as such. Google Street View is obviously not an admissible source for OSM, but a quick gander just now suggests that my memory isn't mistaken and that the route around Malmesbury, at least, is signposted as NCN 254.

That obviously doesn't preclude the route being wrong in OSM (e.g. at Wilton)! But as I understand it, the Wiltshire Cycleway and NCN 254 are intended to be the same.

So the new relation is incorrect, I think. I'd suggest reverting NCN 254 to its previous state, and if you're really keen, creating a new Wiltshire Cycleway relation (route=bicycle, possibly network=rcn) which encompasses NCN 254 and also the linking sections on NCN 45 etc.

If you want clarification from Wiltshire Council (whose route it is) then you can contact Heather Blake there - I'm loth to put email addresses online but she's at @wiltshire.gov.uk with the format they usually use. Certainly I know she's keen for the information to be correct in OSM. I'm at a Sustrans meeting in a few weeks which I think she might be attending, so if I remember I'll check with her then.
xinaes (2019-09-25 15:44:55+00:00): Apologies for verbosity of following. I'll try to review and make the appropriate changes here soon - find it a little ambiguous how the relation should be best expressed, especially being new to OSM editing.

I see from street view that South Street out of Wilton is indeed signed as both Wiltshire Cycleway (WC) and route 254, and the wiltshire.gov.uk complete route map key marks them as being equivalent.  However, the map of section 6 of WC that I'd previously referred to makes no mention of 254, hence my not realising the relation - particularly given that my other encounters with WC signs have been on parts mostly-but-not-always coincident with different NCN routes.  E.g. route 4 around Devizes - 
north from Coate I recall missing a turning on NCN 4, but was still on WC, 'Vale of Pewsey' route, which is not part of NCN.  Looking at the wiltshire.gov.uk complete route map, there are bits which on the ground are signposted WC, but are labelled only as NCN.  So I think my slight confusion about WC:NCN correspondence, and belief that WC was more of a network than a single circular route is somewhat justified.

It seems that the signage around Wilton is right but the maps are wrong.  The complete map and section 6 detail from wiltshire.gov.uk both share the same error (as does the Wiltshire Cycleway relation here) of marking it as going south from Quidhampton rather than Wilton, which strengthened my belief that coincidence of NCN & WC was more coincidental.

I rode this leg on my way to End of the Road festival, on my birthday, and it was a decided low-point of an otherwise joyful day, so I'm quite keen that it gets fixed and am glad that it appears to be about as trivial as it could be.

I had emailed transportplanning @ wiltshire earlier, but will send another to Heather, along with a link here and better understanding. Hopefully this text is still coherent after way too much editing.

Thanks for your input.
Richard (2019-09-25 16:19:17+00:00): I think that the shared-use path in Wilton, along Salisbury Road, postdates the original Wiltshire Cycleway (perhaps a Sustrans Connect2 project?) - and it's that which has enabled the route to be rerouted away from the A3094 and onto South Street. So it's quite plausible that OSM and the Wiltshire PDFs are just reflecting the previous route.
xinaes (2019-09-25 16:58:31+00:00): Sounds plausible indeed. Worth noting here that it remains a short missing segment in route 24 as per both OSM and OS.  It is signed on the ground, though (as route 24, not WC I don't think). Possibly not as clearly as it might be around the roundabout.
I've made another couple of edits which should restore the ref: 254 in WC relation and correct it's routing as discussed.
user_5359 (2019-09-25 14:45:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice, that we use lowercase characters for a key. What ist the meaning of service:vehicle:TRADE-INS?

Short hint: I delete also your advertising. Don't try to reinsert.
MKnight (2019-09-25 13:38:03+00:00): Moin, diese Änderung verstehe ich nicht. Das ist ein Firmengelände, noch dazu mit Toren verschlossen.
Ist denn geplant, das temporar als Wendeschleife zu nutzen?
MKnight (2019-12-17 11:42:28+00:00): Anhand der Position der Bushaltestelle nehme ich stark an, dass die Antwort "ja" ist...
viloan (2019-09-25 10:20:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-09-25 10:29:56+00:00): review.. private=yes is niets..
Bedoel je wellicht access=private...
Dan is het verboden voor iedereen. . ook voor voetgangers.. In dat geval dus nog wel foot=yes toevoegen als je er mag wandelen.

Welk bord staat hier vooraan?
YorickDix (2019-09-25 10:32:52+00:00): volgens mij staat er verboden voor fietsen. het is geen private road
eggie (2019-09-25 10:31:46+00:00): review.. Dit routeert niet meer voor alles op wielen. Voor voegangers routeert het wel.
Welk bord staat er vooraan?
Er komt een fietspad op uit (Bergweg)?
Gr eggie
YorickDix (2019-09-25 10:38:42+00:00): het westerduinpad is zeker geen fietspad, zie streeview, en op streeview zie ik helemaal geen bergweg. kan me niet voorstellen dat daar een fietspad is. of denk ik te makkelijk?
eggie (2019-09-25 10:45:04+00:00): Veel hier is op de Duitse manier getagd. 
highway=path en dan nog foot=designated en bicycle=designated. Die laatste tag zorgt ervoor dat zo'n pad rendert als een fietspad. 
Wanneer daar geen bord Fietspad staat zou die tag er dus afmoeten.
Dit even gezien de tagging op de Bergweg.
Wellicht weet jij welk bord er staat. Verder lopen hier ook wandelroutes. Moeilijk te herkennen in editor iD denk ik.
eggie (2019-09-25 10:48:37+00:00): Het Westerduinpad is als een G13 (onverplicht) fietspad getagd door een ervaren mapper. Daar zou dus wel een bord FIETSPAD vooraan kunnen staan.
eggie (2019-09-25 10:51:02+00:00): Het is 8 dagen geleden omgetagd naar een G13 fietspad. Je zou het AnkEric kunnen vagen.
Hij zal er ongetwijfeld geweest zijn.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74597057#map=16/53.4821/6.1469
Gewoon klikken op zijn naam. Je kunt veel van hem leren.
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-25 10:57:14+00:00): Hier zie je de tagging op het westerduinenpad https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74597057
YorickDix (2019-09-25 11:04:51+00:00): ik zal het mis hebben, ik teer op m'n herinneringen van afgelopen zomer. laat maar.
dreua (2023-01-14 22:04:06+00:00): Hallo, der Tag "drive-through" wurde hier missverstanden und teilweise falsch verwendet. Bitte schau einmal ins Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=drive-through?uselang=en

Es wäre ganz toll, wenn du mal nachsehen könntest, ob du den noch an anderer Stelle eingetragen hast und das ggf. korrigierst. Danke!
Hjart (2019-09-25 13:46:28+00:00): Jægerspris er lige lille nok til at kunne klassificeres som "town" i OSM
UffeKousgaard (2019-09-25 20:31:56+00:00): Jægerspris har en "suburb" ved navn Thyrashøj og det er forbeholdt towns og cities iflg. wikien. Towns eksisterer helt ned til 3000 indb. læste jeg og det er Jægerspris klart over.
osmviborg (2019-09-25 21:07:18+00:00): Lidt afhængig af hvor man læser https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Map_Features#Byer
UffeKousgaard (2019-09-25 21:14:44+00:00): Jeg læste den engelske udgave.
Hjart (2019-09-26 09:24:22+00:00): Bemærk at vi kun har en enkelt klassifikation over "town". og at hvis vi medtager så små byer, så får vi et uforholdsmæssigt stort spænd fra "village" og op til "city". Derfor synes jeg town bør starte ved minimum ca 10K.
532910 (2020-08-02 17:53:48+00:00): Уважаемый, не надо писать в name всякую чушь. Строительство не name, изучайте wiki.
elgolfo (2019-09-25 12:35:25+00:00): Hi, sieht gut aus. Eine Kleinigkeit: highway=track impliziert, dass man dort zu Fuss lang kommt. foot=yes kann also weg. Siehe[0].
Grüße Moritz
[0]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany
--- 
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74903179
elgolfo (2019-09-25 12:36:49+00:00): Hier ist irgendwas schiefgegangen. Schau mal hier: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74903247&relations=true
Du hast versehentlich den Kreuzungsknoten verschoben, und damit auch die Wege.
--- 
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74903247
aseerel4c26 (2019-09-25 17:23:31+00:00): Wachtelnest, brauchst du Hilfe beim Korrigieren? Kein Problem - schreib einfach hier.
aseerel4c26 (2019-10-01 17:37:26+00:00): Hat nun jemand anderes korrigiert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1599112384/history
eggie (2019-09-25 11:23:19+00:00): Beste Eurni.. Probeer je eerst goed in te lezen. zie welkomstmail. Gebouwen zijn allemaal import vanuit het Kadaster (Bagimport)
Dus niet zelf intekenen of iets aan veranderen.
je kunt wel om een import verzoeken via het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Inlog identiek aan OSM account.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-25 11:25:16+00:00): Bedrijven voeg je toe aan de adresnode en niet aan het gebouw zelf. 
Ook hoort daar dan nog de tag bij die de aard van het bedrijf aangeeft. Bv  office=company. 
Elk begin is lastig.
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-25 11:28:44+00:00): Luchtfoto's vertekenen (schuin genomen)  Dus niet gebouwen goed gaan leggen.. dat klopt dan echt niet. Alles is ingemeten.
eggie (2019-09-25 11:35:47+00:00): name=KFH Kunststof Kozijnen Fabriek heb je verwijderd van het gebouw. Dat is correct want die hoort op de adresnode.
De rest van de bedrijfsinfo staat nog op het gebouw. Bestaat het bedrijf niet meer?
eggie (2019-09-25 11:44:49+00:00): De Vries Road & Rail Logistics BV is keurig getagd op de adresnode maar daar hoort nog
office=logistics  bij.
Kijk je nog even? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dlogistics
AndriesWijma (2020-05-30 20:33:31+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85992572
BCNorwich (2019-09-25 13:50:30+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
That looks more like a service road or driveway that an unclassified highway.
Regards Bernard
xTINYx (2019-09-25 14:00:54+00:00): Yes you are right... Sorry its my first submission... How do I add the buildings on the service road?
xTINYx (2019-09-25 14:02:47+00:00): Also how do I change it to a service road?
BCNorwich (2019-09-25 14:13:02+00:00): No problem, after ten years of OSM I still make a few mistakes.
To change the road, open iD editor, click the highway to highlight it, click on top box to edit/change feature, click minor roads, click service road. It should now have changed to service road, upload the change.

Make a building, select the area tool at the top click and draw the area/building, double click to finish. Tag it as appropriate.

I'll have a look later on.

Regards Bernard.
Chris Fleming (2019-10-10 21:10:18+00:00): Is this closed - not shown on the Edinburgh council roadworks page? http://edinburgh.cdmf.info/public/map/map.htm

If so what is the planned date of reopening?
eggie (2019-09-25 11:51:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
BCNorwich (2019-09-25 13:35:03+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
If you leave the name and amenity tagged but change them to disused: Then the history is maintained and folk will still be informed that the business is no longer in use. The name and amenity is then not rendered. This is OSM practice.
Regards Bernard.
4004 (2019-09-28 23:30:01+00:00): swap БУДЗЬ for АВ in name:be please, and refrain from using google translate to name international objects in the future - you could literally ask a native speaker here, on the forum or anywhere else
marcoSt (2019-09-29 11:08:08+00:00): Dear 4004,

thanks for your direction. I will consider this in the future.

Best regards

Marco
Sanniu (2019-09-26 09:25:01+00:00): Seems like this change left lines without tags and not connected to any relation, e.g. node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6822516057
OrDal (2019-09-26 09:33:10+00:00): Hi Sanniu, Thanks for notifying me, You are right. The ways in this changeset was imported from external source and was probably imported twice by mistake.
Fixed in chageset #74947282.
I'm now working on renewing the boundries of all of the local authorities in Israel.
viloan (2019-09-25 11:50:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BCNorwich (2019-09-25 14:00:46+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry but I've reverted your changes because the name is already on the school area outline as per OSM practice. Also your changes were made the the building rather than the relation that the building is part of. 
Regards Bernard.
b-jazz (2019-12-20 20:42:20+00:00): You've named every house in the neighborhood as "Summerlake". AFAIK, that is not the right use for the "name" tag on a house. Also, some of the paths in the area I've noticed double back on themselves, which isn't allowed. Any chance you could clean things up there? Thanks.