piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
c2r (2019-10-12 00:41:37+00:00): Hello,  

I've always tagged roundabout approaches as junction=approach - I must have picked it up from somewhere.  Looking at taginfo, there's about 1760 ways tagged as such all over Europe: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/junction=approach#map although I appreciate that it doesn't appearto be documented - although very little was at the beginning when stuff just sort of evolved.

The approaches themselves are pretty standard approaches to roundabouts in England, i.e. there is typically a raised centre triangular island, for a few meters in length where the carriageway flares and separates from the centre.  It is not an area.  I'd always assumed junction=approach was used as a shorthand to prevent navigation software deciding that a U turn at the gore was acceptable, without needing to actually specify it as such.

I'm not really bothered one way or another as to whether it remains as being a tag or not; whether it is relevant depends on whether it is useful to renderers or to navigation software. However, with the advent of mass aerial imagery and critical mass, I'm not as involved in OSM mapping as I was years ago when GPS traces were needed, although still add the occasional POI/correction so am active in that regard.

I'd suggest asking for a ruling from the powers that be.   It'd presumably be easy to strip the lot from the database programatically if they weren't required/of use.

Cheers
Chris
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-25 09:05:45+00:00): what you meant by amenity=no at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2160020466/history ?
marczoutendijk (2022-07-23 14:31:28+00:00): What is the meaning of landuse=animal?
I recently visited this place and couldn't see any animals.
PiRK (2022-07-23 14:45:10+00:00): Hi. Sorry, that was just a bad joke. After spending way too much time drawing the landuses, i found a herd of cows on the aerial imagery and drew a few blobs.
You can delete them, or leave them for the next person to discover the Easter egg.
Pavel47 (2017-01-29 09:15:19+00:00): А есть какой-то источник у такого названия? Ни на одной из карт местности не встречал.
GerdP (2015-10-28 15:52:49+00:00): please review: 
are the  ways
60598266,60598270,60598260
(Birkenhof)
still not rebuilt?
The have the tag highway=destruction.
frosm (2018-10-31 18:41:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2161114056
Bonjour,
vous vous venez-vous de la signification que vous vouliez en créant cet objet ?
il y a un bassin dans le bâtiment ? c'est une piscine publique ?
bkil (2018-12-30 13:17:41+00:00): Helló! Szeretnénk kérdezni, hogy mit szimbolizálnak ezek a tool=width vonalak, valami terepen is láthatót, vagy törölhetők?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206132149
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126670311
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178696940

Itt merült fel kérdésként:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openstreetmap-hungary/bikMTs3GZWc

Üdv
PT-53 (2017-07-11 11:05:17+00:00): Hallo Kurt34,
Du hast in 2013 diesen Way eingezeichnet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206146555#map=19/48.37666/9.21471) ohne entspr. Tags einzugeben.
Im OSM-Inspector wird deshalb diese Fehlermeldung "ways without Tags" angezeigt: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.21439&lat=48.37651&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-07-16 05:39:12+00:00): Hallo Kurt34,
erledigst Du das noch oder soll ich den Way löschen ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-07-26 08:01:05+00:00): Hallo Kurt 34,
nachdem von Dir keine Reaktion kam, habe ich heute den Way ohne Tags gelöscht.
Grüße
kreuzschnabel (2016-08-18 14:35:27+00:00): Sind das Aussichtspunkte oder Windräder? In der Datenbank stehen jetzt Aussichtspunkte mit komischen Namen. Wenn das keine Aussichtspunkte sind, sondern Windräder, was ich stark vermute, bitte entsprechend taggen. Sind die eigentlich inzwischen gebaut?
przemas75 (2016-08-31 09:44:57+00:00): Dąbka 20A
Nie znajduję takiego adresu w geoportalu gdyńskim, jesteś pewien że to poprawny adres? Propozycja na spacer :D
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202740286
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-03-30 20:46:48+00:00): Olá, um usuário excluiu coisas que voce fez aqui: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102006696
CloCkWeRX (2016-10-02 16:57:52+00:00): Strava users report: "Should be able to cross from south to north here" re http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/279628742 - but imagery is inconclusive. Do you know if this is a wall for certain, or could it be a tunnel?
mrcookie (2016-10-03 21:12:15+00:00): I was there 2 times. The first time there was no MA-3440 and the Cami was uninterrupted. The second time the MA-3440 was REALLY new and interrupted the Cami, and no way to cross. A car had to go backwards up the hill to Llubí, because there even was no way to turn the car and te navi didn't knew it. You are supposed to use the "Camí d'es Dau" now to get on MA-3440.

It looked like, on the south, there were plans to connect the Cami to the roundabout to the west, but it wasn't finished. You see the short stub there.

At the location of the interruption there is definitive no way to cross or to get on the MA.
ForstEK (2019-03-05 15:56:40+00:00): Hi, stkl!
Why did you use tag "building=tower"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206289193/history
Please, see here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tower:type%3Dcooling. May be better to use "man_made=tower"?
###
Hi, stkl!
Warum haben Sie das tag "building=tower" benutzen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206289193/history
Sehen Sie, bitte, hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tower:type%3Dcooling. Kann besser sein, das tag "man_made=tower" um zu verwenden?
Myazyk (2019-08-04 11:13:00+00:00): Не розумію нащо приватний сектор забудовий позначати, що то приватні сади.
landuse=residental, residental=rural
Сергій Дубик (2019-08-04 11:33:03+00:00): Привіт!
Я так і не позначаю.
Див. початковий набір змін https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/7101844, це від Yurk0, правки ще до мене.
В тому районі я тільки починав мапити, і тоді ще не виправляв за іншими.
Зараз приберу leisure=garden...
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-06-10 20:31:01+00:00): Le changeset dit "source=bing" mais quand on voit des nodes tels que ce "doctors" en plein milieu du fleuve, il est évident que la source n'est pas Bing: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2163840433

Alors d'où viennent ces données ? Leur approximation apparemment énorme pollue la carte et le "fixme=	Approx. Location : should be revised!" est manifestement sans effets depuis plus de trois ans.

Je suis très tenté par un revert.
Bruno_Remy (2016-06-11 18:07:27+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Marc,

Effectivement, c'était dû à une mauvaise validation des données avant import. J'ai effectué le revert du changeset.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2016-06-13 08:49:55+00:00): Merci pour http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39957606 - j'avais eu plusieurs remarques d'utilisateurs dont la perception qualitative était dégradée par ces données imprécises. Quelle était la source de données ? Quelle est sa license ? Sa qualité s'est-elle amélioré depuis 2013 ?
DaveF (2018-08-03 14:01:16+00:00): Hi
I'm cleaning up 'C' class roads refs so they don't render. (discussed on Talk:gb)

A while ago you added ref= C114 which conflicted with the existing admin:ref tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120451345/history
Are you able to double check to see which is correct?
Ta
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 07:53:43+00:00): can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4834847 ?
AlbertP (2016-03-07 20:37:22+00:00): Westerstraat still exists, access road to some car parks and supposedly still continues behind the fence as delivery road under Hoog Catharijne towards Stationsdwarsstraat.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-25 01:05:29+00:00): Stawianie znaków highway=give_way jest mało przydatne. Lepiej jest je stawiać na linii drogi (przyklejać do niej).
Ze0zohk1 (2021-01-15 06:37:23+00:00): Hallo hoizbu,

ich weiß, dieses CS ist SEHR alt! Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185852685/ hast du aus surface=unpaved folgendes gemacht: surface=unpaved;wood IMO sollte es reichen, surface=wood zu verwenden. surface=paved und surface=unpaved sind zwei generische Werte, die durch genauere Werte ersetzt werden sollten. Also nur notwendig sind, wenn ein genauerer Wert nicht bekannt ist. Das ist jedenfalls mein Stand. Ich weiß nicht, wie das vor 8 Jahren war! Trotzdem wollte ich darauf hinweisen (besonders, da du noch aktiv bist).

Danke für deine langjährige Treue an OSM!

Viele Grüße
Sanniu (2017-06-25 14:08:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87793408 - מסדה or מצדה?
ForstEK (2018-08-29 05:27:55+00:00): Здравствуйте, Евгений!
Вы отметили здесь объект https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206681829. Сейчас чаще применяются тэг man_made=storage_tank или man_made=gasometer. Возможно ли перетегировать?
evgenykatyshev (2018-08-29 07:01:06+00:00): Если так, то переделайте. Я даже уже не помню что это такое я отметил, давно было.
ForstEK (2018-08-29 13:17:23+00:00): Судя по снимкам, цистерны. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62104435
ElliottPlack (2016-03-01 22:35:26+00:00): Check out the end of the river system where there is some overlapping water and street networks: https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/120#issuecomment-190938303
pangoSE (2019-11-05 08:27:14+00:00): Hej :)
Glesbygd Säter ser ut att vara inkomplett. Se http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=16.86765&lat=62.61645&zoom=10&opacity=0.66
Fixar du själv?
eggie (2018-05-28 13:56:10+00:00): alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
JochenOSM (2019-01-30 18:51:52+00:00): Ist das tatsächlich der Name des Gebäudes?
Tshikey (2019-01-30 20:54:55+00:00): welches gebäude meinst du bitte?

wobei, kann mir nur eines vorstellen und das ist nicht wirklich erst gemeint....
JochenOSM (2019-02-01 15:55:04+00:00): Gemeint ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206715942
Dachte ich mir ;)
hopet (2017-10-12 04:56:33+00:00): To Čertovo kopyto u Dobrohostova je správně? Nedávno jsem tudy jel na kole a nevšiml jsem si nějakého významného turistického bodu. Není to jen omylem zkopírovaný bod z okolí Šimanova (tam jsem ho přidával).
Petr Neda (2017-10-29 10:34:48+00:00): to čertovo kopyto je správně, je tam jenom taková malá dřevěná cedule kde je to napsané. Je to místní značení.
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-22 08:33:48+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce bâtiment semble ne plus être une gare aujourd'hui.
Je propose de :
- passer le tag "name" en "old_name" et enlever du coup le mot "Ancienne".
- passer le tag "station" en "disused:station"
Baloo Uriza (2021-07-07 14:58:55+00:00): What is this supposed to be?
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-22 08:34:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce bâtiment semble ne plus être une gare aujourd'hui.
Je propose de :
- passer le tag "name" en "old_name" et enlever du coup le mot "Ancienne".
- passer le tag "station" en "disused:station"
marc__marc (2024-10-05 22:06:13+00:00): Bonjour Escada,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157519008
regarde si cela correspond bien au sens que tu aurais eu en tête il y a si longtemps :)
Cordialement,
Marc
olsols (2024-05-02 10:48:05+00:00): hej, droga na zachód z Pniówka to nie jest "droga tylko dla koni" - jeśli to jakiś szlak dla jeźdźców to powinien być inaczej zaznaczony. Jak jest jako bridleway to nawigacje rowerowe głupieją i go ją omijają. Zmieniam na polne drogi
Supaplex (2022-07-12 10:04:47+00:00): Hi,

雖然有點久了，你也未必會去看討論通知，你港墘路的英文拼音，少打了一個g，應該是Gangqian Road，跟你說一聲。
Josef73 (2019-01-01 14:59:43+00:00): Hello, is "Tia Rosa Patacon" an restaurant? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/369068
kapazao (2026-02-05 11:41:16+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías dar referencias sobre el perímetro de lo que llamas "Pago Juan Ramos"?
SomeoneElse (2016-08-25 10:17:36+00:00): The "Nottingham" node has been moved back to slab square (between the lions), so some online routers (e.g. the ones at osm.org) do struggle with it.  My Garmin works fine though :)
I'd suggest logging a bug with whatever online users you were trying to use to route here that failed.  The current position is pretty much "correct" for any reasonable definition of the centre of Nottingham.
komintern (2019-04-19 08:34:14+00:00): Большевиков 22
GerdP (2015-11-27 15:24:26+00:00): Hi there!
I've removed the confusing tag highway=ski 
to make sure that routers don't try to route normal traffic on them. The ways were all members of correct route=piste relations. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35613375
*Martin* (2015-11-27 19:29:58+00:00): Hi GerdP

Only naive routers would route normal traffic on highway=ski. Please revert the change and assign highway=piste to the affected primitives. Thanks.
Sanniu (2017-06-18 11:39:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/806891495 - מעלה כנען or גבעת שושנה?
zstadler (2017-06-18 11:52:07+00:00): Fixed.
גבעת שושנה is a different node.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/835702317
Werner Mairl (2018-05-19 11:10:51+00:00): "Loipe" means cross-country skiing!
That means the track is there only in the Winter if there is snow.

i was on this track yesterday (spring/summer) partially there is exactly NO Track, more: it is not possible to pass....
but i see a lot of (hiking maps) that are showing this track :-(

I'm new here: there is any tag/attribute to declare this better ?
Luzandro (2018-05-19 11:39:35+00:00): The xc route is defined by this relation that references the ways that belong to the route:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2781952

Some of these ways don't have any track tags and thereby don't show up on a summer map:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206964205#map=16/47.9993/16.0885

Some are tracks, but with a rather bad tracktype of 4 or 5 (which is rendered differently by the default style on osm.org):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype

So you could degrade tracktype or remove the track attributes altogether if you are sure, that there is no track at all anymore. Do NOT delete the way itself, as this would break the xc relation.
But first you need to know, which particular track you are talking about.
Patr1k_P (2022-05-22 08:31:13+00:00): service=residential je ok? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207097631
t_ja (2022-05-22 08:41:21+00:00): Asi áno, keď to nikomu nevadilo posledných 9 rokov :)

Vďaka za upozornenie, opravil som.
Patr1k_P (2022-05-22 08:56:23+00:00): toto fixme tu nie je zbytocne?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062039384

...chcel som to vymazat a vsimol som si tu cestu..tak reku radsej sa opytam, viem ze som v tvojom revire, tak aby si ma nezjedzil:) ale ani validator s tym nemal problem
t_ja (2022-05-22 09:07:04+00:00): Podľa mňa je to fixme zbytočné. Nová budova zatiaľ nie je v katastri, takže sa nedá určiť, či je to len "prístavba" (t.j. adresa 290/2), alebo samostatná budova (ktorej sa v budúcnosti priradí nová adresa, napr. "2A").

Riešenie ponechávam na tebe.
Roland Pallai (2015-03-13 14:12:56+00:00): Az itt adott "Tornyosnémeti (SK/HU) - Röszke (HU/SR)" névnél nem lenne jobb a "Tiszamente kerékpárút" elnevezés? Végülis ez a szakasz az egész gerince, kifejezőbb és renderen jobban mutat mint a jelenlegi név.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-07 15:15:36+00:00): What would suggest as an appropriate "trail visibility" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility ) for the path across Morecambe Bay https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177018529 ?
Sunfishtommy (2015-09-01 14:18:15+00:00): Decent edit, but you did not add that it was a road that you mapped, thanks for adding it though.  I am going to clean it up and add highway tertiary
user_5359 (2019-09-03 19:55:53+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the meaning of the keys. Specialy https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2174024742 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2174024410.
GerdP (2015-11-14 19:57:46+00:00): please review:
What was meant with surface=A ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207249499
NoelB (2015-11-15 18:38:45+00:00): this was clearly an error and is now fixed. I typed capital A instead of lowercase  when selecting the road surface.
GerdP (2015-11-15 19:35:55+00:00): okay, thanks for the feedback.
hendrik-17 (2016-01-27 17:05:52+00:00): Hallo Obelixx,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz vor drei Jahren mal einige Freileitungen eingetragen. Diese Leitungen existieren heute alle nicht mehr, es sind (bis auf einen Mast) auch keine Spuren davon mehr sichtbar. Bei einigen Leitungen ist der Verlauf auch falsch bzw. es scheint mir fraglich ob (und wann) diese je existiert haben.

Ich habe die keys jetzt erstmal mit einem Lifecycle prefix [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix] versehen, damit Anwendungen, die nach einem power=*-Key filtern, diese Daten nicht mehr anzeigen, was zu Irritationen führen kann.

Kann ich die Leitungen aus OSM entfernen oder ist es dir lieber, wenn ich sie jetzt so belasse? In einer älteren Version hattest du ja darum gebeten die Leitungen nicht zu löschen.

Viele Grüße
hendrik-17
Obelixx (2016-01-28 13:03:14+00:00): Wenn besagte Leitungen auf keiner gebräuchlichen Satellitenbildserie, wie Bing oder Google Maps mehr zu sehen sind, dann können sie gelöscht werden. Schließlich waren diese Leitung historisch nicht bedeutend.
hendrik-17 (2016-01-29 17:54:34+00:00): Die Leitungen sind auf aktuellen Satellitenbildern tatsächlich nicht mehr zu sehen. Ich habe die Daten jetzt also gelöscht.
Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung!
Gruß
hendrik-17
Mark Esperanto (2019-11-04 05:42:35+00:00): Ist die Kläranlage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207269719 noch aktiv oder handelt es sich lediglich um ehemalige Klärteiche?
puma515 (2019-11-04 10:11:36+00:00): Die ist Aktiv. das ist die ortsentwässerung der Gemeinde Grauel
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 16:22:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2174601496/history has shop = accessories that was added in this edit
shop=accessories ? What kind of accessories are sold here? Fashion accessories? Car parts? Gun accessories?

Maybe use shop=fashion_accessories for clothing accessories, shop=car_parts for car accessories or other shop=* instead - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=accessories
freebeer (2019-09-10 15:02:26+00:00): hoi,
can you help me with the puzzle presented by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/509583261 ?

one-way seems wrong, so might you have meant a re-ordered `no' to be expanded into, oh, i dunno, no-exit, no-way-out, no-future, no-worries, or something equally negative?

thanks
Minh Nguyen (2019-09-10 16:23:13+00:00): Thanks for spotting this error. I had intended to tag it as highway=turning_circle. Most likely I used the R key (repeat) but previously mistagged another node due to an overreliance on Potlatch 2’s autocompletion suggestions. Sometimes my keystrokes got inserted out of order due to asynchronous keystroke handling in the Flash plugin.

Fixed in changeset 74320023. Hopefully there aren’t too many more instances where I made this error.
danieldegroot2 (2022-04-25 19:29:14+00:00): Hey there,

I have reverted your changes in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120180562
as there are unverifiable (non-physical, no source specified).

Specify a source for your changes from which can be concluded these are physical objects, please.

Regards,

Daniel
Carto'Cité (2019-07-03 19:56:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207472237) se trouve sur un itinéraire cyclable et vous avez ajouté bicycle=no. Pouvez-vous me confirmer qu'elle est bien interdite au vélo (ce qui serait étrange) ?
Merci d'avance pour votre aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdf
GerdP (2015-10-31 09:55:05+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=divider is only used by you (7 times)
Is it a barrier=line or maybe barrier=kerb?
Sample: way 207489502
PlaneMad (2015-11-04 19:11:42+00:00): Thanks, have retagged them to barrier=kerb
GerdP (2015-11-04 19:14:07+00:00): thanks for that and for the feedback
GerdP (2015-11-05 15:08:52+00:00): Do you think that this might also match here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/15340040
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-19 15:02:34+00:00): ta droga nadal jest planowana?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105480434/history
eggie (2018-03-25 13:00:51+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen.. daarom.. alnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Lee Carré (2021-08-15 19:50:09+00:00): For node #2178471595 (originally RBC on Broad Street), from where did the addr:housenumber come from? This changeset doesn't specify a source, nor does the node's tags.

Now that it's offices for the States, the addr:housenumber they give is different. See, for example, http://www.gov.je/Government/Consultations/Pages/RegulationOfChildrensSocialWorkAndMentalHealthServices.aspx

Given the quality of your work on this map (thanks very much, BTW), and the reputation of the States, I'm inclined to think that they're more likely to be incorrect than you are.
OffTheChart (2021-08-17 08:47:18+00:00): Thanks for your kind words. 
My mistake, 15 and 17 were bought in the early 1900s and the Post Office built there.
The RBC/States are 19-21. I've corrected this now.
Cheers
Lee Carré (2021-08-17 19:29:43+00:00): I noticed changeset #109795734 which now seems the better place to reply.
Mecki (2017-12-28 16:07:41+00:00): Hey Magnus,

what's the purpose of this line in OSM?

BR
Mecki
Magnus-L (2017-12-28 16:51:32+00:00): The purpose is snowmobile related information, for snowmobile-trail maps.
SomeoneElse2 (2023-02-14 01:09:51+00:00): Hello,
Are these https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2178765359/history wells or water tanks?  I'd have thought that they were fairly different structures.
Best Regards,
Andy
Dave In The Carse (2023-02-14 10:10:23+00:00): They are wells, Andy and some, including one in our garden can still be found though most have been filled in. The only "tank" I'm aware of is one that existed on the public bleaching green and it would have been filled with water pumped from an adjacent well.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-26 19:56:37+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2556653 ?
Johnbo (2023-05-17 12:16:34+00:00): Hola Truji. ¿Estás seguro de que el jardín se llama Huerta del Sotillo y no Huerta del Sordillo? En https://cordobapedia.wikanda.es/wiki/Huerta_del_Sordillo y demás referencias que encuentro lo llaman así.
Truji2012 (2023-05-17 12:21:42+00:00): Sí, posiblemente me equivoqué
Johnbo (2023-05-18 09:46:22+00:00): Gracias, era por saber si tenías alguna fuente y valorarla contra las otras. Revisaré a ver si encuentro alguna fehaciente y lo cambiaré.
dadavid (2023-12-02 22:44:31+00:00): Hi Lordeinsenhard, 
du hattest hier [1] mal eine Telefonnummer ohne weiteres POI Tagging zb Namen o.ä. eingetragen. Ich vermute mal das war ein Versehen. Da gabs wohl mal ne Werbeagentur, vielleicht wolltest du die eintragen? 

Ich hab den phone Tag jetzt mal entfernt, aber schau gern nochmal drüber :) 
Grüße
David
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206852128
aharvey (2015-02-15 21:45:40+00:00): For way 866109501, I wouldn't class it is trail_visibility=bad (Path sometimes invisible, route partly pathless), as I found markers frequently along the trail, which sometimes had to be searched for which according to the wiki is trail_visibility=good (Next marker always visible, but sometimes has to be searched for) or maybe intermediate?
aharvey (2015-02-15 21:47:03+00:00): Oops that's way 86610951
dreua (2024-02-22 01:09:15+00:00): Hallo, ist jetzt schon 11 Jahre her aber ich frag trotzdem mal: Hier ist an ganz vielen Masten "levels" getaggt, ist der Tag irgendwo dokumentiert? Würdest du das heute noch so machen? iD warnt nervigerweise davor und meint das müsse building:levels heißen, was hier aber wohl quatsch ist. Da ich aber keine Beschreibung zu diesen "levels" finde weiß ich gerade nicht wie man damit am Besten umgeht.
Vielen Dank und Grüße
David
pangoSE (2018-09-17 17:00:42+00:00): =hut verkar fel. stämmer wilderness_hut här?
SomeoneElse (2015-12-20 21:33:03+00:00): Hi, while importing GB data into a rendering database I noticed that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207887907 had an odd layer tag.  It might be deliberate, but just letting you know in case it wasn't.