piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ndm (2018-07-01 08:26:41+00:00): This is an automated edit that hasn't been agreed I'll revert this in due course and any others that affect local sites. There's no attempt to keep information in old_name or disused: name. Sites with signage should still have name, but I'm assuming you haven't bothered to survey them.
SK53 (2018-07-03 10:37:59+00:00): Yes, please always discuss this with the relevant local community. In my area we have enough mappers that we like to actually re-survey locations of closed stores.
Borbus (2018-09-30 11:27:27+00:00): This edit removed the name from Norwich Toys'R'Us. Have you surveyed it to confirm the sign has been removed? We have a note on the map because the sign is still on the building as far as I know.
SomeoneElse (2018-11-18 13:21:14+00:00): The York one got edited incorrectly as well.  Please don't just delete stuff where the shop has closed but you don't know the current situation - map it properly as whatever it is now.  Some map styles will explicitly show disused shops - see for example https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=18&lat=53.990068&lon=-1.108912 - the Maplins there shut some time ago but is still signed as Maplins.  The Toys R Us has had an "old_name" added back after your edit but is still missing a main shop/amenity tag.
SK53 (2018-11-19 21:51:20+00:00): Noted a prominent Toys R Us store from the train over the weekend. Someone not knowing the chain was in administration would look for this as a prominent marker.
dktue (2018-06-30 20:55:07+00:00): ToDo erledigt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60310218#map=19/48.43084/9.06588&layers=N
damjang (2018-06-30 21:18:21+00:00): Ciao! Nel catasto grotte come nome principale è Landri Scur, anche se come altro nome c'è anche Landre Scur. Non sarebbe meglio mettere il nome che appare in catasto grotte? Cosa ne pensi?

Grazie
Gh0stz0x (2018-07-01 06:10:24+00:00): Si potrebbero mettere tutti e due: il nome che c'è nel catasto e/o il più utilizzato in name e l'altro in alt_name.
damjang (2018-07-01 11:34:29+00:00): Si, pensavo anche io così, ma quale mettere come principale? Quello del catasto?
Hippy_Owls (2018-07-01 17:25:37+00:00): Ciao, io, sono solo, un escursionista appassionato di montagna, che durante il periodo estivo , si dedica pure al mestiere del ciclista (almeno ci provo), quindi quando trovo qualche buco nero dentro alla mappa contribuisco nel mio piccolo a migliorarla, poi riguardo ai nomi, io scrivo solo quelli che da cartellonistica (CAI, ecc..) trovo scritti lungo i vari  sentieri/strade...Poi se sbaglio qualcosa, correggete pure tranquillamente i dati errati.
Gh0stz0x (2018-07-01 19:54:15+00:00): Penso che sia meglio utilizzare la regola "on the ground" se sulla cartellonistica c'è quel nome, si presume pure che sia il più utilizzato comunemente. Tieni conto che spesso i nomi dei catasti sono vecchi e non più utilizzati esempio: c'è un paese vicino dove abito che da CTR viene chiamato Aveno (termine medievale) sul cartello all'ingresso del paese Avano. Quindi seguirei quello che c'è scritto sui cartelli e mettere magari su official_name il nome, visto che è del catasto, al massimo lo puoi inserire in alt_name se non sei sicuro dell'ufficialità.
Gh0stz0x (2018-07-01 19:55:56+00:00): Hippi_Owls bravo, c'è sempre bisogno di contributori. Grazie e buon mapping! 😁
damjang (2018-07-02 13:18:17+00:00): Sono d'accordo di usare come nome principale il nome che si trova sui cartelloni. Procedo anche ad aggiungere l'altro nome in alt_name
ajf3934221 (2018-06-30 21:10:21+00:00): merci
AA_NP (2018-07-05 15:19:14+00:00): Hi there
I am not 100% sure that the new coding for the M50 from the motorway roundabout eastbound is correct. The signs show it as the R139 (June 2017). There is no reason why this section should be coded as motorway - can you verify with current and up to date road signs please? Thanks
VictorIE (2018-07-05 21:24:17+00:00): Ultimately, unless you want to double back, it only leads to motorways. The "motorway ahead" sign is east of the Bewley's (Clayton Hotel) roundabout.

To be honest, the situation / signage is a bit of a shambles, with a mix of blue, green and white signage in use. The roads schedule, like many, is incomplete.

If you mean the signs like this: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/yj7B8VwmmwLWpc0gk0OkgQ then they should not be marked as "R139" (meaning "this is the R139"), but as "(R139)" (meaning "this leads to the R139")

If this is a regional road, why is this sign in blue? https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ny8NeWJ6A2ZfjmFr3sW3kA Again, this should be marked "(L2055)", as  you have to go via the L2051.

This sign is wrong, as the R139 doesn't go to Malahide. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/-PTx548tkyQhE6mK6yPU4w

If we look at the statutory orders and the council road schedule, the R139 only exists east of the L2051.

-----------------------

http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2012/si/53/made/en/print

N50

Dublin Ring Road

Between ... via DUBLIN PORT TUNNEL, KILMORE (and including link road to R132 at Whitehall), TURNAPIN (and including link road to R139), 

-----------------------

http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2012/si/54/made/en/print

R139

Clonshaugh - Baldoyle, Dublin (Part of old National Route 32)

Between its junction with M50 link road at Clonshaugh Road in the county of Fingal and and its junction with with R106 at Main Street Baldoyle in the county of Fingal via Belcamp Lane, Clare Hall Avenue and Grange Road in the city of Dublin: Grange Road and Willie Nolan Road in the county of Fingal.

-----------------------

https://data.smartdublin.ie/datastore/dump/a65522f1-9333-4d63-9671-44c95d44390e?format=xml

Fingal Roads Schedule

L-2051-0
Three road junction of Clonshaugh Road and Baskin Lane and New Stockhole Lane
Roundabout junction of M50 ext, N32 and Clonshaugh Road at Bewleys Hotel

-----------------------

This section of the R139 doesn't seem to be listed in the Fingal Roads Schedule.

-----------------------
AA_NP (2018-07-06 08:09:17+00:00): Thank you for your reply and all the information you have supplied. It does look inconsistent in the signing. This one here looks to be clear showing it as motorway -  https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.4103644,-6.2160402,3a,75y,265.04h,89.26t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sRgzQaQ039Nv3r3U29tJcAg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

However,  I will contact the TII and ask them the question.
Nakaner (2018-07-01 13:21:55+00:00): Hi Matthew,

this is a very helpful changeset and I ask myself if I should revert it because it looks like a mechanical edit. If you had reviewed the objects you edited, you would have noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5726680621 is located on a street.

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2018-07-01 13:22:41+00:00): Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F
Matthew Darwin (2018-07-01 13:37:58+00:00): The changes were done by hand. as you see when I do other edits of similar types, I fix up multiple attributes where I can. 

I do not have enough knowledge to move the POI to a better location.   Feel free to contact the original editor and suggest a better location.
Nakaner (2018-07-01 14:04:45+00:00): Hi Matthew,

well, I only look at the address and check if addr:city and addr:street seem to be correct. There are two main problems with these Wheelmap edits:

1. Users using the geocoder and selecting any result. They trust the result even if the name of the city is ambiguous or the geocoder returned a match where parts of the address are equal (e.g. same street but different city).

2. Users using the Android app and its "locate me" feature. If no GPS fix is possible, the app uses the last known location. This can be anywhere but most likely wrong.

3. Users using the iOS or Android (?) which has hard-coded default coordinates if the app is used for the first time. One is the geographic centre of Germany (Sozialhelden e.V., the owner of Wheelmap is a German non-profit) or a building in Taubenstraße, Berlin. New POIs pile up there.

I reverted some edits of the user which were totally wrong (a Winnepeg POI on British Virgin Islands) and asked him to fix the others which were on the Canvec addr:*=* node and not in the building. I hope he responds.

Best regards

Michael
H1nzP (2018-12-13 09:16:45+00:00): Wieso wurden Node 5730442665 und 5730442664 erstellt? Das ist doch ein Betriebsgelände der BVG.
Nakaner (2018-07-01 12:07:37+00:00): Hi loChefBarbuto,

I have removed the townhall you added because it was located on a street intersection. Please move the markers of the features to the correct locations before saving them.

I would like to ask you not to use Wheelmap and use the online editor at www.openstreetmap.org instead. Changes at openstreetmap.org will get into Wheelmap within a few minutes. Our editor is maintained and does not position features at the wrong location.

You receive this comment because Wheelmap shares all changes with OpenStreetMap. You can answer this comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60311111 after logging in with your OSM account (you need one to add new features to Wheelmap).

Best regards

Michael
eggie (2018-07-01 05:12:40+00:00): Wellicht al gemapt onder een ouder account.. dan toch een welkomstmail.. bij deze.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-07-01 05:23:58+00:00): Hier een voorbeeld met leisure=nature_reserve
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.87765/4.66944
timmito (2018-07-02 11:10:08+00:00): Hallo Taunuswichtel und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Warum hast du den Hardtberg verschoben? Ein natural=peak markiert den höchsten Punkt, dieser ist in der Nähe des Hardtbergturms.
TaunusWichtel (2018-07-02 14:44:03+00:00): Hallo timmito,
Anfängerfehler - das war ein Versehen. Einfach zurückschieben ging auch nicht, da der Gipfel zum Knoten einer LInie geworden war (???). Ich habe also den Punkt mit allen Eigenschaften neu erstellt und den (überflüssigen) Linienknoten gelöscht. Sobald er eingetragen ist werde ich die Koordinaten auch noch genau wiederherstellen. Ich hoffe, dass jetzt alles wieder stimmt... Sorry!
LG Taunuswichtel
timmito (2018-07-02 15:26:16+00:00): Kein Problem, solche Fehler passieren. Jetzt sollte alles wieder stimmen.
user_5359 (2018-07-01 05:15:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is there another marketplace with a new name or is the marketplace  closed?
Mike Baggaley (2018-08-26 10:49:02+00:00): Hi, in this changer you have set ways 407735575 and 603904094 to access=no + bicycle=yes. Can you confirm whether pedestrian access is allowed? I suggest adding foot=yes or foot=no as appropriate to clarify the access (many mappers put access=no when they actually mean vehicle=no or motor_vehicle=no).

Thanks,
Mike
smeòrach (2018-08-28 21:51:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for pointing out. I've fixed it.
Warin61 (2018-09-24 05:07:19+00:00): Hi,
How does this walk way connect to East Bank Road? A the moment they dont connect.
29dollars (2018-09-26 14:18:02+00:00): Hi
The walk path starts very close to the road (some metres) from memory, but I'm not sure that it technically connects but it is clearly meant that the path is meant to be accessed directly from the road. From memory I think there is a rough grassy area  around where the road ends and where the car park is and the path starts in the grassy area. The road, car park and path are all just gravel and are not all that well defined so it's a little hard (or arbitrary) to be too precise.  I don't think it would be a problem to properly connect the road and path on OSM if that's what you are suggesting.
I'm not sure if that answers your question?
Warin61 (2018-09-26 21:42:30+00:00): At the moment a routing engine for a person on foot on the path has nowhere to go at the end. Not connected to the road so they cannot walk to it and then along the road. The only option they have is to walk back along the path.
29dollars (2018-09-29 02:29:23+00:00): OK, thanks.  That's a good point that I hadn't thought about properly.  I've now tidied up the road end and path end (so they link) as well as the car park.  Hopefully that has fixed it.  The unfinished task is that the path continues on to the north to another road (I understand), but I did not walk that far so I don't have a trace for it.  At the moment the path is only shown as going as far north as I walked before I ran out of light.
viloan (2018-07-01 01:50:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2019-02-07 15:07:09+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-01 18:15:44+00:00): Hi klaranovikova, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped service ways? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60313750
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:20:59+00:00): Вот ты стараешься, поганишь карту, удаляешь каждую тропинку вручную, а мне нужно меньше десяти щелчков, чтобы всё отменить. Почему ты не можешь просто угомониться и не портить никому жизнь?
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:23:25+00:00): Откатил из-за вандальной направленности остальных правок, сам за объекты поручиться не могу.
LeifRasmussen (2018-07-01 03:45:18+00:00): This should have been done using the account "LeifRasmussen".  :\
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:28:45+00:00): Возле кольца есть два регулируемых перехода, да и вообще, может сначала надо освоить интерфейс и правила сообщества, а потом уже и пакостить не захочется.
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:38:39+00:00): А теперь открываем google street view и обнаруживаем удаленные тротуары, наличие которых на карты в виде отдельных линий позволяет graphhopper'у  строить пешеходные маршруты.
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:41:07+00:00): Красная пунктирная линия означает не проезд, а пешеходную дорожку.
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:44:38+00:00): Насколько я знаю, точка входа должна находиться на границе полигона, но сам полигон не заслуживает такого обращения.
LeifRasmussen (2018-07-01 04:13:45+00:00): This should have been via "LeifRasmussen_import".
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:46:18+00:00): Хотелось бы увидеть ссылку на обсуждение на форуме OSM, где принято решение очистить скверы от лишних дорожек.
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:48:21+00:00): Google street view опять показывает удалённые объекты. Автобусные остановки, в данном случае.
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:49:19+00:00): И дорожка есть, и тропинка. Постоянно по ним езжу.
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:51:11+00:00): Но к остановке протоптана хорошая народная тропа, что и было указано.
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:53:08+00:00): А вот тут я сам не решался удалять, но  стройка, похоже, действительно закончена. Первый набор невандальных правок, поздравляю.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-01 18:14:51+00:00): Hi klaranovikova, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped paths? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60313960
save2desk (2018-07-03 14:15:39+00:00): Хватит портить карты. Сядь на велосипед, съезди на местность и убедись, что все удаленные дороги присутствуют.
А пока я твои правки так и буду откатывать.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:35:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:47:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:11:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:37:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:56:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
keithonearth (2018-07-01 05:55:38+00:00): I saved the address of the building that was here before the construction, by placing it on a node. I expect that the same address will be used on the new building, but that should be double checked.
naoliv (2018-07-04 13:14:43+00:00): Grzmot, há várias edições suas que claramente não estão corretas.
Por exemplo, colocar áreas no meio da cidade como geleiras.
O OpenStreetMap é um projeto sério e coisas erradas inseridas de forma proposital assim não são bem vindas.
É possível com que você passe a editar o mapa corretamente, por favor?
anu_smita (2019-07-23 03:01:27+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways

"way 603932791
way 603932790"

where in configuration also does not seem to match the ground reality and can be changed as per this screenshot : https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-yqBOpGXb_-g/XTZ1beAp4EI/AAAAAAAAAdc/RHtboL497Yc7PwV72vAlJwfTwhyiV8MvgCK8BGAs/s0/2019-07-22.png

Please suggest if it is otherwise.

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-29 14:05:46+00:00): I'm a local, active mapper around this place (Alor Setar town and its surroundings) - so you have my word.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603932790
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603932791

Please check the edit dates too. Bing imagery across the city dates from 2014. Maxar imageries (which can also be found in Esri World Imagery) could be from 2017.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-29 14:11:08+00:00): Unfortunately I may have not uploaded my own collection of GPS tracks to map details like this, but hopefully your team gets what I'm trying to convey the message.
Carnildo (2018-07-01 09:08:47+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

A couple of tips for better mapping:

1. You can change the background imagery by clicking on the "Background settings" tab in the editor -- the one that looks sort of like three stacked sheets of paper.  Different imagery options are newer, or sharper, or better-aligned.  In the Missoula area, it looks like "Esri World Imagery" is the newest, while "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" is the sharpest.  I can't tell about alignment.

2. When you're adding things to the map, try not to connect unrelated objects to each other: it makes the map harder to edit and can confuse software that's trying to interpret the data.  Connecting similar types of objects is fine (eg. connecting a park to a residential area, or connecting two buildings that share a wall), and connecting intersecting roads, trails, and the like is essential for routing software to be able to work properly.

You can tell that the editor wants to connect two objects because your cursor gains a tiny green dot or line in the lower-right corner, and you can tell they've been connected because there's a gray dot at the point where they meet.

Thanks for your contributions, and happy mapping!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:33:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:05:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
MadelNL (2018-07-16 13:18:31+00:00): Hoi,

De heren ontwerpers hebben daar (bij RCN 46) een behoorlijke puinhoop gemaakt en ambtenaren hebben liggen slapen. De doorsteek naar de Mensheggerweg bestaat niet en fietsers mogen nu samen met bromfietsers over een stuk fietspad van recyclinggranulaat (bij het Gravenroderpad).
Dezelfde puinhoop en wantertoning is te vinden bij de N300 aan de overzijde van de Hamstraat. Daar hebben ze zelfs nog bordjes fietspad neergezet... Met mijn trekkingfiets is het al nauwelijks te rijden, maar met racefietsen kun je het wel vergeten om dit stukje fietsroute te rijden.

Grtz Marco (EOSfoto)