piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stevea (2019-04-08 17:46:23+00:00): Jan:  These ALL_CAPS tags are from the CPAD shapefile and I agree with you should be better logically-mapped to OSM tags where possible.  See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Santa_Cruz_County,_California#Parks for at least some information about CPAD.  The ACRES tag is a vestige, you or I can delete it without harm.

The roads are public access, but are only an "easement" through the property, which remains protected by the local Land Trust (you can also visit their web site at https://www.landtrustsantacruz.org/).  I'm not sure you have similar organizations in your country.  If you are interested, visit the site and click the What We Do / How We Do It tab.

I wouldn't know how to better tag an "easement" road like this:  a public road through a land trust private, protected area any better than it is.  I hope my explanation is satisfactory, though you are welcome to edit and improve tagging to something better now that you know (or better understand) what the ownership and access are.

-Steve
stevea (2019-04-08 17:56:58+00:00): By the way, it doesn't always happen this way (the Land Trust might simply continue to protect the land "in perpetuity," but it happens enough to mention that this is how (state, county) parks, open space preserves and similar kinds of lands around here grow, piece by piece.  In other words, this might very well someday become part of nearby Portola Redwoods State Park or Long Ridge Open Space Preserve, but "not yet."
mueschel (2019-04-08 18:17:44+00:00): Alright, if this is correct everything is fine. I just wondered if it is correct or a mistake.
stevea (2019-04-08 18:26:30+00:00): The MNG_AGENCY_TYP should have (and has) become governance_type (thank you).  The boundary and protect_class keys were wrongly omitted and have been added (thank you).

So, in short, "thank you!" for helping to correct at least a couple of minor mistakes.  As I say in my Mapper of the Month interview, "no mapping task that positively contributes to OSM is too small."

-Steve
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-22 20:05:05+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3236680 ?
eggie (2019-03-31 07:13:32+00:00): Dag Tycho.. 
Elk begin is moeilijk en OSM wel in het bijzonder...
Ik heb het parallelvoetpad en het extra tunneltje (dat niet bestaat)  weer verwijderd.
Parallelvoetpaden worden in OSM niet apart gemapt. Het routeert allemaal niet. De tags voor dat trottoir zitten al opgesloten in het fietspad zelf. Sommige kaarten laten dat ook zien. In dit geval met sidewalk=right.
Er is dus al een trottoir getekend al zul je dat op deze standaardkaart niet zien.
De voetgangersoversteekplaats over de Driessveldlaan zou je dus beter ook kunnen opnemen in het fietspad met sidewalk=right
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-31 07:16:30+00:00): Paralleltrottoirs worden wel apart gemapt als er bv een groenstrook tussen de verschillende wegen zit. Dat is hier niet het geval.
eggie (2019-03-31 07:45:40+00:00): In de tunnel zitten de tags
sidewalk=both en cycleway=lane (fietsstrook) 
Dat laatste zie je op echte fietskaarten wel. 
Gr eggie
smootheFiets (2020-04-18 00:51:16+00:00): Hoi Andries,

Ik heb de access-tags langs de Kustweg wat aangepast. Het gaat vooral om het vertalen van deze bordjes naar tags: 
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Hnt_ZiKgEsow0oawxUQE2A

Ik lees: motoren en auto's mogen er niet langs (C12) tussen Ma 07:30 en Vr 23:00 (dus wel tijdens het weekend; permissive want eigen weg), behalve bestemmingsverkeer: die mag altijd.

Zou je je daarin kunnen vinden?

Groetjes, smootheFiets
AndriesWijma (2020-04-18 02:00:31+00:00): Bedankt voor je attente vraag!

Ik ben het eens met je interpretatie van de bebording. Je gewijzigde tagging kan ik me ook in vinden. Bijv. ermee rekening houdend dat routers moeite kunnen hebben met interpretatie van een conditional: bij mijn methode zou motor_vehicle dan op permissive uitkomen, terwijl het beter is dat destination de hoofdwaarde is. Liever wat meer kans op te lage verwachting scheppen qua toegang dan te hoge verwachting.

Verder goede correctie dat de toengangsbeperkingen inderdaad niet kort na de rotonde maar pas na een kilometer in oostelijke richting gelden.

Je bent echt goed bezig!
eggie (2019-03-31 06:51:50+00:00): Dag Tycho.. het is natuurlijk goed als een winkel is verdwenen om dit aan te passen. Haal voortaan alleen de info van de winkel weg en niet de hele adresnode. Dat adres bestaat immers nog. Ik zal het BAG adres (Kadaster info)  herstellen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-31 06:56:29+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #68716700
eggie (2019-03-31 07:00:20+00:00): Winkelinfo verwijderd na herstel adresnode.
viloan (2019-03-30 22:53:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
4004 (2019-04-14 11:08:43+00:00): здраствуйте,
мы не добавляем названия обьектам, у которых его (названия) нет - этот лес никто в округе не называет Дикий, а поляну я вообще не понимаю откуда вы взяли.
и еще будьте аккуратнее при движении точек, а то ломаете дороги

вот не повахтеришь и такое сразу
Andy_T_56 (2019-04-02 09:55:37+00:00): Hi Warin61. I agree that the "point" tag is meaningless which you have updated but feel that Natural - Cape would be a better feature definition for these coastal "Points". I have updated a couple but seek your opinion before I continue. The "Locality" tag does imply more of a cultural name as opposed to a geographical feature. Cheers, Andrew
Warin61 (2019-04-02 23:03:32+00:00): Hi,
I think these only had the name tag.. nothing else. 
Go ahead. I could not think of anything else to tag them.
viloan (2019-03-30 23:26:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
skdirorkfk (2019-03-30 23:44:56+00:00): Please do a quick search before reverting this
SomeoneElse (2019-03-31 08:10:49+00:00): Please contact the data working group by email via data@osmfoundation.org
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-31 08:13:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68717915 where the changeset comment is: Reverting renaming of a park, seemingly for advertising purposes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2632
Maturi0n (2019-04-13 14:02:16+00:00): I agree that these names should be in Romanian by default, but why do you say these names are inexistent?
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-04-13 18:05:30+00:00): There are no street names in these villages. 
https://i.imgur.com/1MQcBu7.png
viloan (2019-03-30 23:48:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Truchin (2019-04-02 13:27:52+00:00): J'ai modifié la place de la pyramide. C'est un rond-point à présent et non pas un giratoire --> priorité à droite.
Bonne continuation

Thomas
Baloo Uriza (2019-04-02 04:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68776853 where the changeset comment is: Backing out of mass deletion by new mapper that can't be readily verified.
user_5359 (2019-03-31 14:43:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
jmapb (2019-03-31 15:35:06+00:00): Hi apnaqua, I've reverted this changeset with changeset 68727452. Reasons:
 - The bike lane on Plaza Street is definitely two-way, not one-way, so removing the "oneway:bicycle=no" tags is incorrect. See pics taken today at https://imgur.com/a/KYa3dZ2
 - Adding "oneway=no" to the cycleways south of Union Street is not necessary. If a routing engine is treating these as one-way, that's a problem with the routing engine, not with the tagging.
- Node 5837304274 (Wellington's kitchen studio) was relocated from Atlantic Avenue to Vanderbilt Avenue. I'm guessing this was just an accidental drag, but if this shop really has moved, please locate it inside the appropriate building footprint and adjust the address tagging as appropriate.

If you can describe what sort of routing problems you were trying to address with this changeset, I might be able to help.

Thanks, J
Baloo Uriza (2019-04-02 16:37:17+00:00): You can leave off all the access tags there, highway=footway already implies foot=yes and all other modes no.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68713384
ountiv (2019-04-03 13:21:32+00:00): Good to know. I’ll fix that. Thanks
ma-rt-in (2019-03-31 12:59:38+00:00): Hallo,
wenn du nach PTv2 mappst, braucht ein pt=platform/hw=bus_stop kein bus=yes.
vg
ma-rt-in (2019-03-31 13:00:48+00:00): Des Weiteren, halte dich doch bei der Busline an die Vorgaben. Zum Bsp.: Für jeden Strecke eine Relatio.
vg
viloan (2019-03-31 02:31:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-03-31 12:51:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please? I know that you are working with StreetComplete, just asking the house number is unfortunately a "feature" of this tool.
viloan (2019-03-31 03:31:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
peuiron (2019-03-31 03:44:53+00:00): PRAÇA COM ÁREAS DE LASER, COM CICLOVIA, LOCAL PARA CAMINHADA, LOCAL PARA TEATRO, ACADEMIA PUBLICA, PARQUINHO INFANTIL. ÓTIMO PARA VIRAR PARQUE NO POKEMON GO PARA SE TER REIDE EX.
Ewen Hill (2019-10-06 12:23:03+00:00): The Old Gunbarrel heads north east from Jackie Junction to Warakurna so the route to the south/south east is not it
nevw (2019-03-31 09:28:30+00:00): Hi 
please spell out street names in full instead of using abbreviations like St and also begin each word of a name with an upper case letter.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
nevw (2019-04-04 04:26:24+00:00): no response, fixed name abbreviations
Kiekin (2019-05-15 06:35:17+00:00): 2 Radwege?
Andreas_HGW (2019-05-15 19:27:33+00:00): ja, Rad und Fußweg neben der Strasse
literan (2019-04-02 19:40:43+00:00): Добрый день. Подскажите, что это за маршрут https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9438111 и как можно убедиться в его существовании (какие пруфы)?
mrbaja (2019-04-02 20:19:52+00:00): ЗКМ зеленое кольцо Москвы 160 км.
Представлен на сайте rutrail.org
viloan (2019-03-31 06:43:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-03-31 07:42:18+00:00): ops, sorry for wrong changeset tags - it was a manually reviewed edit
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-03-31 07:42:25+00:00): ops, sorry for wrong changeset tags - it was a manually reviewed edit
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-03-31 07:42:22+00:00): ops, sorry for wrong changeset tags - it was a manually reviewed edit
viloan (2019-03-31 08:08:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Ars-UA (2019-03-31 08:32:45+00:00): В ТТУ есть правило, что имена остановок транспорта не должны повторяться. Автобусная "улица Гугеля" уже есть, поэтому надо переименовать или в Мерзляка, или в Голубенко.
Mazda05 (2019-03-31 08:35:27+00:00): там ТТУ не останавливается, это автобусная остановка, где останавливается только частный перевозчик (Мариуполь-Авто)
Ars-UA (2019-03-31 08:36:36+00:00): Всё равно. Это общая концепция города.
Ars-UA (2019-03-31 08:36:57+00:00): В Мерзляка или Голубенко?
Mazda05 (2019-03-31 08:38:06+00:00): нет такой концепции, по маршруту это "Улица Гугеля"
Ars-UA (2019-03-31 08:39:20+00:00): На 35т две улицы Гугеля и две 130-й дивизии.
Mazda05 (2019-03-31 08:40:53+00:00): Южная «Гугеля» - это Парк Лепорского. Северная «130-й таганрогской» - это лицей автотранспорта
Ars-UA (2019-03-31 08:41:15+00:00): К тому же практически в одной точке теперь уже три остановки с разными названиями. Это будет путать.
Mazda05 (2019-03-31 08:42:06+00:00): кого путать? 2 остановки трамвайные, 1 остановка автобусная
Ars-UA (2019-03-31 08:45:42+00:00): Со 130-й перепутал, но две ул. Гугеля на 35т - это непорядок. Парк Лепорского - официально такой остановки нет, она Гугеля. В транспорте так и объявляют. Переименуйте, пожалуйста.
Mazda05 (2019-03-31 08:47:13+00:00): реестра остановок ОТ без повторений названий и других косяков пока нет, поэтому предлагаю либо переименовать южную Гугеля в парк и/или закинуть в alt_name "Улица Мерзляка" или "Успеновка". Голубенко там никак не попадает. В 35Т не объявляют остановки
Ars-UA (2019-03-31 08:50:23+00:00): В автобусах и троллейбусах объявляют как Гугеля. Предлагаю в северной в alt_name Гугеля.
Mazda05 (2019-03-31 08:51:34+00:00): Если цель избежать повторений - можно именовать как "Успеновка", в alt_name "Гугеля"
Ars-UA (2019-03-31 08:59:53+00:00): Ну хоть так, но три разных названия в одном месте - это тоже не есть хорошо. Мерзляка неблагозвучно, но Голубенко вроде ничего.
Mazda05 (2019-03-31 09:00:06+00:00): заменил для избежания повторений названий остановок в одном маршруте
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-31 08:13:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 68712179.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-31 08:29:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68718252 where the changeset comment is: Reverting renaming of a park, seemingly for advertising purposes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2632 et al
iriman (2019-04-08 16:03:19+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز. در رسم میدان‌ها هر معبر با رسیدن به میدان تمام می‌شود و نباید معبر و میدان روی هم بیفتند. با رسیدن معبر به یک نقطه از میدان، ادامهٔ معبر را قیچی کنید و از نقطهٔ دیگری در میدان رسم آن را ادامه دهید.

همچنین به میدان‌ها تگ 
junction=roundabout
بدهید.

راهنمایی بیشتر:
http://ir-osm.mihanblog.com/post/5
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Fa:Beginners' guide
ArastehNasab (2019-04-09 04:16:37+00:00): سلام
حتما
ممنون از تذکرتون
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-31 08:29:59+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 68717943.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-31 08:43:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68718491 where the changeset comment is: Reverting renaming of a park, seemingly for advertising purposes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2632 et al
km2bp (2019-06-08 10:20:08+00:00): Feil!  Alle bussholdeplasser er flyttet til feil sted.  Ukkestadbrua  er her  https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xv716FlWpYKIya7_tzpDSQ   /    https://goo.gl/maps/UzmVpjX8inbeFY4A6

Du har også slettet bilder tildelt til stoppesteder. Hvorfor?
https://d1cuyjsrcm0gby.cloudfront.net/C4S6kEoojNgNFlIXQ0axYw/thumb-2048.jpg
nsr2osm (2019-06-08 11:29:18+00:00): Da er det bare å flytte den :)
km2bp (2019-06-08 11:33:02+00:00): Du reparerer det du brøt sammen. Jeg har ikke tid nå.
FredrikLindseth (2019-06-08 11:57:36+00:00): Alle stoppestedene er vel ikke flyttet feil. Noen har gjerne blitt det, men hvis de blir flyttet igjen så er det fikset for alltid. Hele Norge har jo fått stoppesteder nå
km2bp (2019-06-08 12:09:17+00:00): Jeg går på jobb her hver dag, og jeg er sikker på at minst tre  har blitt feilplassert  Ukkestadbrua https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6373570070 , Ukkestad krysset  og Ukkestad meieri  Og disse to bussholdeplasser eksisterer ikke   https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6373570070
km2bp (2019-06-08 12:09:55+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xv716FlWpYKIya7_tzpDSQ
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2019-06-10 10:49:27+00:00): Hei km2bp. Opplastet data kommer fra nasjonalt stoppestedsregister (NSR) fra Entur, som bruker (i disse tilfellene) Ruter sine data som kilde. Jeg har nå meldt om disse feilene til Ruter sånn at de kan korrigere posisjonene. Rettet informasjon vil deretter propageres til alle kanaler som benytter seg av NSR (nsr2osm, Google Maps, Apple Maps, Gule Sider etc.). I disse tilfellene dreier det seg sannsynligvis om stoppesteder opprettet for lenge siden på gamle (eller dårlige) kart, og sannsynligvis før veiombygginger. Vi er takknemlige for alle tilbakemeldinger om feil og mangler, og vi overvåker også alle endringer i data som blir gjort på stoppesteder i OSM for å få med oss mest mulig nyttig informasjon.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-31 08:43:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 68718303.
opendcc (2019-03-31 09:09:37+00:00): Hallo,

was habe ich da falsch gemacht?

Servus Wolfgang
gormur (2019-05-23 10:37:47+00:00): What was wrong this multipolygon? Did it warrant outright deleting it?
sebastic (2019-05-23 10:46:10+00:00): It had no tags after the duplicate tags were removed in the changeset before mine:

 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9349785/history
gormur (2019-05-23 10:56:42+00:00): I see. It was that edit was in the wrong. Don't know if you looked into this before you deleted the relation? Reverted.
sebastic (2019-05-23 11:04:16+00:00): I did, and the change looked sensible, it should have deleted the relation instead of just removing the tags.

With your revert you risk the duplicate information being removed from the relation again.
gormur (2019-05-23 11:39:49+00:00): Sensible? I disagree.

There were two aerodrome objects:
* A multipolygon with several correct tags and outline of the aerodrome.
* A node with fewer tags than the MP.

They both represent the same object but are not exact duplicates. The MP had significantly more information in it.
Then someone delete _all_ of the tags on the multipolygon? I don't call that sensible.

With that edit, the rendering of the aerodrome outline disappeared, f.ex.

Also: The edit you refer to was done by a editor with only a handful of edits at the time.

Also: Your changeset comment is misleading. Deleting an untagged MP is not the same as "fixing old-style multipolygons"