piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ProfessorLupin (2022-02-25 19:21:39+00:00): Okay, thank you for letting me know.
Warin61 (2021-11-18 07:31:40+00:00): Hi,

Using JOSM validator there appears to be a lot of errors/warning here. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.80982&lat=-31.94067&zoom=18 for a small sample.
Sunislife10 (2021-11-17 18:49:51+00:00): Sources also included https://github.com/osmlab/appledata/issues/160
Warin61 (2021-11-28 06:50:11+00:00): JOSM Validator auto fixes used to fix numerous errors in the Telstra Corporate Centre. E.G. 265 nodes deleted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-16 23:53:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113871957, 113871989, 113872033, 113872082.
DankJae (2021-11-17 18:05:15+00:00): The Welsh names are used in English. These roads are only signposted in their Welsh names. These added translated names are not used locally. Furthermore, there is a Montgomery Road located a mile south-west. There aren't two Montgomery Roads.
VLD075 (2021-11-17 20:32:55+00:00): Hello Dank - Jay, thank you for bringing this to our attention. I apologize for the mistake and have informed the mapper to better understand these specific scenarios when it comes to the language tag. Thank you again for reaching out about this situation and if there is anything else we can help with or discuss please feel free to reach out.
mapperue (2024-01-28 16:17:34+00:00): Ahoj,
táto cesta, kde je povolený vjazd len dopravnej obsluhe sa značí ako motor_vehicle=delivery. Značka motor_vehicle=permit sa používa len keď je umožnený prejazd po získaní povolenia na požiadanie.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326971952
Tiež značka bicycle=designated na tejto ceste je značená nesprávne. Táto značka sa používa len na cestách, kde je dopravná značka. Viac info tu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated
Warin61 (2021-11-18 07:21:13+00:00): No.

It is not a multiplygon.. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.80982&lat=-31.94067&zoom=18

Simplest solution - retrace the outline. 
? Is the outdoor seating on top of a ground floor ... or is it not really part of the building?
BudgieInWA (2021-11-22 05:09:05+00:00): Thanks! I'm trying to see if it is at all possible to avoid retracing, because the overlapping areas are a pain to work with.

I think the geofabrik self intersection error is to do with the building:part=yes crossing over nodes without including them. Does my latest change [1] work? Hopefully multipolygons support adjacent regions like this.

The seating area is on a deck (slightly raised floor level, no roof). Adding building:part is appropriate, so I went with 'deck'.

1: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114081043
Warin61 (2021-11-22 07:52:09+00:00): The geofabrik runs ~every day .. so you can check it about a day after you make changes to see. The JOSM validator also does some checks too .. see if you have any errors or warnings there before you upload the data to OSM. .
Warin61 (2021-11-24 06:53:26+00:00): JOSM validator reports
Errors (2)
Multipolygon outer way shares segment with other ring (2)
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@3a9bb5c, code=1606, message=Multipolygon outer way shares segment with other ring]
TestError [tester=org.openstreetmap.josm.data.validation.tests.MultipolygonTest@3a9bb5c, code=1606, message=Multipolygon outer way shares segment with other ring]

That has nothing to do with crossing ways. It has to do with "shared segments"
pitfire (2021-11-17 06:21:15+00:00): Hallo EinfachAleks,
Der Eintrag (nohousenumber=yes) ist unüblich. Rechtliche Grundlage in Deutschland gelten Hausnummern fürs Grundstück.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr
pitfire (2021-11-17 05:58:00+00:00): Hallo EinfachAleks,
Informiere dich bitte einmal, was die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit (surface 	dirt) bedeutet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface. Die alte Einstufung (surface 	compacted) ist da wohl passender.
pitfire (2021-11-17 05:37:08+00:00): Hallo EinfachAleks,
bist du sicher, das der Abschnitt (619529456)  	DE:rural ist. Nach meiner Meinung ist die gesamte Bundesgrenzschutzstrasse DEːurban.
Siehe Ortsschild:https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.753138919156&lng=7.1567906319258&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=236907484858228&x=0.445410859301964&y=0.6145078007292568&zoom=0.6043830655124579
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 16:48:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002855891/history has roof:type = flat that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=flat was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
ramthelinefeed (2021-11-17 08:38:53+00:00): How come's you deleted the Yukon Road bit, Mac?
ramthelinefeed (2021-11-17 08:51:53+00:00): Oh sorry, doh - it's meant to be Dinsmore Road for the other segment, isn't it? https://haveyoursay.tfl.gov.uk/11846/widgets/34821/documents/17406 is the URL for the map now ( cs7-balham-alderbrook-road-overview-map.pdf )
MacLondon (2021-11-17 13:04:47+00:00): Yep. I'd sent you a private message mentioning this. You had also mapped the 2 links here as a single (i.e. 'continuous') route which isn't the case.
mapper377 (2021-11-17 02:32:24+00:00): Accidentally hit the return key too soon. The "vvv" at the beginning should be deleted. "norton, OH" should be capitalized. The sentence "Edit portions of parallel lines." should be appended to the comment.
AngocA (2021-12-10 21:53:47+00:00): Los living streets no existen en Colombia
user_14250389 (2021-11-17 04:38:37+00:00): FreedSky您好，感谢您对开放街图所作之贡献，但您的变更集或许范围过大，已经进入台湾所在区域，台北台中这些编辑频繁的区域都被覆盖到，还望以后能尽量避免这种大边界之变更集出现。
ZeLonewolf (2021-11-27 11:48:24+00:00): Hi, thanks for helping to improve the map!  I'd like to invite you to the OpenStreetMap US Slack server, where you can chat with other local mappers in the channel #local-kansas.  Hope to see you there!

Slack can be found at: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
pyram (2022-01-05 20:00:07+00:00): review:
You have moved two paths, creating several intersections with other paths and with buildings.
(See the green lines at the shared nodes with other ways:  http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=113879788 and http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=113879294 )
I have moved the nodes back to their previous location.

Nothing happened ;-)

Best regards
pyram
ivanbranco (2022-01-13 16:02:28+00:00): Hi Ro Sun,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4488166036/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4488166037

this nodes have a weird place value, could you check it out please?
ff5722 (2021-11-23 09:03:15+00:00): This doesn't appear to have opened yet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154993526
pyram (2022-01-05 20:00:45+00:00): review:
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113879294 too
Polarbear (2022-09-05 21:29:33+00:00): Hi StefanHRT,
aus welchem Grund hast du die Wohnstraßen rund um den Teschener Weg, z.B. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147470146
alle zu highway=service gemacht?
Selbst wenn sie schmal sind, auch eine schmale Wohnstraße ist eine Wohnstraße?
StefanHRT (2022-09-06 00:57:51+00:00): Hi Polarbear,
Das ganze Gelände ist eher ein Privatgelände und in ALKIS habe ich auch keine ofizielle Straßenbezeichnungen gefunden daher war die Änderung auf service. Nicht korrekt? kann das auch gerne wieder ändern.
StefanHRT (2022-09-06 01:18:08+00:00): Ergänzung: in Stadtplänen, der Bezirkskarte etc. sind die Namen der Wege enthalten, aber die Grundlage für die Änderung war der ALKIS-Layer (wobei ich sehe das es diesmal hier nicht mit als Quelle angezeigt wurde). Bin leider bisher noch nicht zu gekommen, dort einmal mit dem Fahrrad und der 360°-Cam durchzufahren.
Polarbear (2022-09-08 18:41:32+00:00): Wir haben das heute auf dem Stammtisch diskutiert und sind einhellig der Meinung, dass es sich um residential handelt. 
Insbesondere sind das eigenständige Strassen, keine Stichstrassen wie man sie z.B. zwischen Apartmentblöcken findet. 
Das Eigentum interessiert da weniger.
Sie haben auch Strassennummern nach dem Berliner Schlüsselsystem. 
Teschener Weg z.B. 04454.
Habs im JOSM offen und setze es wieder rauf.
StefanHRT (2022-09-09 01:12:27+00:00): OK, kein Problem, hätte das sonst auch abgeändert ;)
archpdx (2021-11-17 06:00:27+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for resolving my note, really appreciate your recent edits in the Portland metro area. Looking forward to your future contributions.

-archpdx
danbjoseph (2021-11-30 14:03:37+00:00): please square your buildings and align the footprint as closely as possible to the feature visible in the satellite imagery.
mueschel (2021-11-19 10:35:38+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, it got several strange keys:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8699918339
user_5359 (2021-11-18 10:57:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003351641. Notice we use lowercase key and values.
4004 (2021-11-22 02:16:15+00:00): далеко не каждое локалити - урочище https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8438227871
kucai (2021-11-26 16:01:24+00:00): why are you changing residential roads to service roads?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Carnildo (2021-11-22 22:01:00+00:00): Where did you get the routing of the "Etter Ranch Access Trail" from?  I went hiking there last Saturday, and while the lower section is pretty much spot-on (except for the name), the upper section bears no resemblance to reality.
deven_smith_ (2021-11-29 18:07:33+00:00): As I mentioned in the change note description, it was an approximation of the trail from the sheet Spokane County provided. That's where I got the name also
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Gonéo (2021-11-18 14:29:43+00:00): Merci d'utiliser une description explicite dans les ensembles de changement (changeset). Ceci permettra aux autres contributeurs de comprendre ce qui a été fait.
D'autre part, s'il s'agit de la mise à jour d'un commerce, il est préférable de garder l'ancien point et de le mettre à jour. Afin de conserver l'historique.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113883949
Gonéo (2021-11-18 14:55:57+00:00): Les tags "addr:*" pour le "shop" créent un doublon d'adresse avec le point d'adresse ajouté. Il vaut mieux supprimer l'adresse sur le commerce ou alors les changer enr "contact:addr:*"

Merci aussi d'utiliser une description plus explicite pour le changeset :-)

D'autre part le "addr:city" est inutile, il est automatiquement déduit parce que le point est dans le polygone de la ville. Mieux vaut le retirer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113884074
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:54:46+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:54:37+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
nevw (2021-11-20 01:41:49+00:00): Hi John
I changed the tags on some of your edits from highway=residential + construction=yes to 
highway=construction + construction=residential
Guided by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
But I notice that CyclOSM does not render highway=construction.
Would you prefer I reverted them to your previous tagging which is rendered on that style?
I think either tagging method is valid
Nev
nevw (2021-11-20 03:39:25+00:00): ....cyclOSM appears not to be up to date with the rendering currently.
nevw (2021-11-21 10:10:49+00:00): CyclOSM has been struggling with the render of under construction ways
https://github.com/cyclosm/cyclosm-cartocss-style/issues/28
John Sinclair (2021-11-22 11:39:15+00:00): Thank Nev,
The general rule is "don't tag for the renderer". It might be by design that Cyclosm doesn't render roads under construction, because it considers them unfit for cyclists.
Doesn't matter to me, leave your edits.
Regards,
John
nevw (2021-11-22 13:14:43+00:00): Thanks, cheers, Nev
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:54:27+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Gonéo (2021-11-18 15:10:13+00:00): Le nom ne doit pas contenir une description. Pour une voie privée c'est
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private
et donc pas de name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113884937
Gonéo (2021-11-18 15:12:30+00:00): Pour les parkings concernés ici c'est parking=street_side (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113884937
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:54:12+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:53:33+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:53:26+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:53:19+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:53:13+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:53:07+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:53:00+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:52:54+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:52:48+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:52:42+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:52:35+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:52:28+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
FrankOverman (2021-11-17 08:21:59+00:00): Als ik mijn werk mag afmaken ...
arvdk (2021-11-17 08:30:04+00:00): Oh excuses, ik was er vanuit gegaan dat u klaar was.
FrankOverman (2021-11-17 09:20:49+00:00): NP, maar soms zijn mensen te snel.
Ik kijk vaak na, in achavi, of mijn transactie wel compleet is.
En zeg aub 'je', dit is opensource: we hebben toch allemaal geiten wollen sokken ;)
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:52:20+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:52:08+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:51:58+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:51:50+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:51:41+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:51:33+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:51:16+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:50:52+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:50:39+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:50:29+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:50:20+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:49:46+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:49:38+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:49:28+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:49:19+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
osmviborg (2021-11-17 09:05:44+00:00): Hej. Den der butik du har lavet her,  den er noget fejlplaceret.
frydzio (2021-11-21 20:03:56+00:00): Polish law allows to ride bicycle on sidewalk only if max speed on the road is bigger than 50. In this case you cannot officially using sidewalk to ride bicycle and newly added tag is incorrect.
MFlamm (2021-11-17 11:12:27+00:00): Hello,
Peux-tu STP aussi désactiver ce type de requête SC? En effet, elle génère la plupart du temps des tags redondants et alourdit du coup inutilement les données (dans cet exemple concret, trois tags distincts pour indiquer que le chemin est asphalté :-(
v0lv0x (2021-11-18 08:52:03+00:00): Effectivement mais je constate que c'est sur 3 key diffrérentes: cycleway, footway et surface. Pour des apps de guidage spécialisées, n'est-ce pas important d'avoir le type de surface en fonction du mode de déplacement (vélo, chaise roulante, pied, ...)?
MFlamm (2021-11-19 09:48:24+00:00): La distinction de surface peut être utile, mais à mon avis le tag surface=* devrait logiquement être considéré comme suffisant si toutes les valeurs sont identiques. Sur ce point, StreetComplete mériterait clairement d'être amélioré afin de limiter la multiplication des tags!
Pamela N (2021-11-17 09:14:01+00:00): 19213672
17 November 2021
kartler175 (2021-11-18 09:54:31+00:00): Knoten in Flächenumrissen im Meterbereich sind völlig unrealistsich und täuschen eine Genauigkeit vor, die weder mit den vorhanden Mitteln erreichbar noch  erforderlich ist. Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337526799
opendcc (2023-01-20 13:33:04+00:00): Hier wird wohl mit einem Differenzier-Filter einfach am Farbunterschied entlang gerendert. Sachlich ist das schlicht falsch, Waldgrenzen sollen auf Bodenebene erfasst werden, nicht bei den Blattspitzen. So bekommen unendlich viel Müll in die Datenbank.
dieterdreist (2021-11-18 13:28:51+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed you have marked the whole of Villa Ada as building :)
No worries, I have already fixed it, but please be careful when uploading and check the modifications that are shown for something unusual before confirming.
Thank you,
Cheers Martin
Glassman (2021-11-17 17:37:34+00:00): #TIP: Check out the wiki, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:charge, for proper use of the charge key. Instead of adding information that changes regularly I use just add website= to the tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113887635
transthropology (2021-11-17 17:44:23+00:00): Apologies, and thank you!
Mannivu (2021-11-17 22:52:08+00:00): Attenzione a non togliere il nome, però
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113887895
miche101 (2021-11-18 13:20:41+00:00): Hi,

ich verstehe deinen Changeset nicht? Was hast du da gemacht.. außer irgendwelche Wege.. aus welchen Gründen zu teilen?

Dabei sind so einige Relationen zu Bruch gegangen:

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html#A2.5.6.3

... Buslinen 400er war bis vor tagen noch fehlerfrei.

Gruß Miche
miche101 (2021-11-18 13:25:57+00:00): oder der Changeset schuld :-\ hmm k.A. aber >20 Relationen kaputt

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113886873
drlellinger (2021-11-18 15:50:46+00:00): Keine Ahnung was genau da passiert ist.
Ich hab die Ways geteilt um insgesamt drei neue Wanderweg-Relationen zu erstellen.
drlellinger (2021-11-18 15:54:01+00:00): Ich werd schauen was ich machen kann um die Relationen zu reparieren
drlellinger (2021-11-18 17:13:20+00:00): Ich checks nicht. Beispiel Linie 446 (9911003) sieht in OSM alles in Ordnung aus. Worin besteht der Fehler?
miche101 (2021-11-18 17:19:19+00:00): .. ahh der Toni hat schon repariert..
 
>Bearbeitet vor ca. einer Stunde von ToniE · Änderungssatz #113950813

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9911003#map=14/48.1650/11.8686
Trubalu (2023-08-06 07:30:25+00:00): Hello Nicole,

Thank you for all your additions to OSM - it's good to see all these new buildings in Pretoria!

However, it is recommended to edit already existing objects instead of deleting them and creating them anew.

In addition I suggest that you make use of the "q" shortcut when editing with iD (to square the corners of a feature) so you get proper geometry and 90° angles for buildings (if applicable of course).

Just a hint for future mapping ;)

Cheers, and thanks again for your contributions!
Manuel
Warin61 (2022-12-26 08:31:13+00:00): Hi,
"Bus Route 180X: Singleton Station to Maitland Station (Express Service)" is not a name but a description... something far shorter would attrack less 'attention' in the name tag? "Bus 180X Singleton to Maitland" .???
EMREOYUN (2021-11-20 19:09:46+00:00): Thank you for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap community :)
Discostu36 (2023-01-01 14:10:25+00:00): Die Hansensstraße ist in einer 30-Zone
francians (2021-11-17 12:46:34+00:00): Ciao,

Non va bene trasformare il sentiero in pista ciclabile per segnalare che ci si può andare in Mtb. Meglio usare btm:scale con valori appropriati.
Ricordo che il default Italia per i Path è: horse, bicycle e foot=yes, questi tag sono dunque inutili.
Se hai dubbi, scrivi pure
Grazie
Francesco
Allison P (2021-11-18 02:23:36+00:00): Is there really a turning lane separated by an island here? No such thing appears on aerial imagery.
literan (2021-11-17 17:32:20+00:00): вряд ли это название здания (а других значащих тегов вы не добавили)
11daf (2021-11-18 05:24:52+00:00): Приветствую. Это название бизнес-центра. Такое же как "Норд хаус" у здания рядом. Думаю, building=commercial достаточно для такого типа зданий. Или нет?
literan (2021-11-18 13:31:01+00:00): Добрый день. Понятно, прошу прощения, кажется я неверно понял вашу правку. 

А бизнес-центр это только вот это здание (обратите внимание, я разделил его на два здания по адресному реестру) или весь комплекс с номером зданий 100? Во втором случае надо вешать его название на территорию...

Ну и обычно вешают name=Бизнес центр "N" (хотя есть и сторонники писать в этот тег только то, что в кавычках. Честно, я сам еще не определился со своей позицией до конца :-)