piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
lcmortensen (2015-12-19 07:03:13+00:00): Edits reverted by changeset 36040444 - the Waikato Expressway is not a designated motorway.
yurasi (2017-02-14 23:28:18+00:00): Hi Edianta. 
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added tag oneway =yes to an road very long (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386347141). ¿Are you knowledgeable of this area? ¿Are you certain? 
It is important this theme, the comunity need to know if the roads son uniderectional or biridirectional. Please, check your change.
GerdP (2016-01-11 07:52:55+00:00): Hallo!
Ich bin gerade zufällig auf die beiden Knoten mit 
highway=service
service=emergency_access
gestoßen. Das ist ziemlich unüblich.
Kennst Du entrance=emergency ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance
highbuilder (2016-01-11 09:25:24+00:00): Hoi GerdP, vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ich hab es gleich korrigiert auf entrance= emergency_access
GerdP (2016-01-11 10:33:01+00:00): :-)
jumbanho (2015-12-19 13:06:25+00:00): The sidewalk added along Cleveland Avenue was actually part of the electric system.
manings (2015-12-21 05:29:21+00:00): @jumbanho, I revisited may edits and it seems you have corrected them. Thank you very much.
LarsBG (2016-11-01 16:12:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386434400/history
Jeg håber du er enig i at det ikke er en service vej men en cykel sti. Se evt her https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=GGp3nxDplVeI1wNz6-S3nw&lat=56.20454396&lng=9.51151073&z=17
Hjart (2016-11-01 18:57:25+00:00): Det kan du have fuldstændig ret i. Hvorfor tegner du i øvrigt så smalle hække som polygoner?
LarsBG (2016-11-01 21:49:32+00:00): Perfekt. 
Når der er detaljerede billeder til rådighed - så er det jo så muligt at lave detaljerede kort.
Hjart (2016-11-02 09:42:24+00:00): Når hækkene på et tidspunkt skal rettes, fordi virkeligheden på jorden er ændret, foretrækker jeg personligt at det ikke er mere besværligt end højst nødvendigt. Det vil sige at jeg vil foretrækker at hækken er markeret med en enkelt linie.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-18 23:07:36+00:00): I've reverted this.  A passing place is the exact opposite of a rest area.
GerdP (2016-03-19 04:29:28+00:00): sure, but the aerial image shows a two lane road with a rest_area, while a passing_place is a "Location of a widening on a road allowing oncoming vehicles to pass each other"
So please review your change.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-19 11:12:49+00:00): On the imagery it doesn't look like a rest area at all - I can't see any facilities there.  
Depending on the traffic on the road there may well be a need for a large passing place for extra-wide traffic to pass each other; alternatively it may be an informal parking area or simply an entrance to some forest tracks that we can't see on the imagery.  I've not been there and neither I suspect have you.
If you don't understand why something is tagged as it is please don't just change it to something that you do understand but is very probably wrong.  Perhaps add an OSM note saying that passing places aren't usually mapped as areas (and certainly aren't usually this large).
There's quite a lot of mapping activity in Bulgaria at the moment, so local mappers will discover it - maybe not immediately, but eventually.
Even having "unexpected" tagging in OSM is useful as it draws people's attention to things that might need an on-the-ground survey.
GerdP (2016-03-20 08:17:26+00:00): Andy, I tried hard to understand what you are trying to teach me here, but I failed. 
Besides the fact that I still think that rest_area matches much better than passing_place I think that I follow the first rule in "Good practice":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_correct_errors
You seem to claim that this rule is wrong ?
Commodoortje (2015-12-18 08:39:45+00:00): Dit zijn geen geoorloofde tags op OSM.

user=Ministerie van EZ
version=1
visible=true

Graag uw reactie.
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:15:54+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Commodoortje (2015-12-18 08:58:25+00:00): Onderstaande tags zijn niet geoorloofd in OSM. 

user=Ministerie van EZ
version=1
visible=true
kayle (2015-12-18 09:20:22+00:00): Ahoj, keď dávaš adresné údaje ako bod, nemá zmysel tam dávať building=yes a hlavne building:levels.
Lepšie by bolo v tomto prípade to dať na miesto kde je vchod to paneláku a pridať tomu aj tag entrance=yes.

A prosím pozri v tejto úprave adresu 902/34 a 902/34h či je dobre zaznačená, lebo tretí vchod na tej budove má súpisné 954.

Ak je niečo z toho tu nejasné stačí sa opýtať.
lxbarth (2015-12-18 11:43:52+00:00): Awesome shacks.
Stalfur (2016-01-30 03:18:57+00:00): Federal District is no more?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/29/mexico-city-name-change-federal-district-df
Jesper Henriksen (2015-12-18 14:43:17+00:00): Det virker som om du har justert denne vei basert på Bing, men husket du å justere offset? Hvis du justerer offset slik at adressenoderne passer med husene, ser du at veien nå er flere meter ved siden av der den skal være. Den var nok bedre før. Det allerbeste hadde vært å lage noen GPS spor, som du da kan justere offset etter.
Commodoortje (2015-12-18 08:54:49+00:00): Welke bron gebruikt u tijdens deze bijdrage?

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=7951CM&objectId=0180100000012210&geometry.x=211100.2312&geometry.y=518519.3198&zoomlevel=13&detailsObjectId=0180010000007492
tomhukins (2015-12-21 19:28:30+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for editing OpenStreetMap.  It's always good to see new people contributing.

However, I noticed you added a building that takes up all the space between Hamilton Road and Hardy Road.  I assume this is a mistake, as there are many buildings here, so I have removed it.

I hope you continue to work on the map.  If you have any questions about doing so please ask - I'm happy to try and help.

Tom
Firefishy (2015-12-19 15:13:15+00:00): Dankie! Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your local knowledge is invaluable. Happy mapping. - Grant
Muisvoël (2015-12-19 15:22:18+00:00): Thank you! - Peter
rohieb (2016-04-20 02:41:00+00:00): Oh, das war mir gar nicht bewusst. Wo erfährt man sowas, außer regelmäßig auf die Schilder vor Ort zu schauen? :-)
geltmar (2016-04-20 19:12:02+00:00): z.B. hier:
http://www.braunschweig.de/politik_verwaltung/bekanntmachungen/strassennamen/strassennamen.html
auch verlinkt aus dem (etwas verwaisten) BS wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Braunschweig
rohieb (2016-04-21 19:06:19+00:00): Ah, danke für diesen Link. Gleich mal das RSS in meinen Feed-Reader werfen :)
SomeoneElse (2015-12-19 20:14:40+00:00): Alas, I don't think that there is an flagpole called "Isfahan" here. :(

What there is is a NOAA buoy - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3870646160 . It even has its own website - http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010 , with current weather and everything!
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:15:48+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
geri-oc (2016-02-22 10:42:18+00:00): Bitte hier einmal schauen:
Way ohne tag - mit addr:street ...

In JOSM einmal Prüfung benutzen - noch nicht geändert.
mysho (2015-12-18 11:54:07+00:00): oh, forgot to change the comment here - didn't notice the web editor puts your last comment to a new change
EinKonstanzer (2016-08-06 15:26:15+00:00): Den Parkplatz gibt es in der Form nicht. In der Gegend gibt es fast immer Parkplätze entlang der Straße.
Ich habe heute den Spielplatz wieder korrigiert. Du hattest daraus ein Polygon gemacht und dann die Wege daran befestigt. Im Prinzip so wie man eine Fußgängerzone/Fläche macht. Warum? Ein Spielplatz ist völlig unabhängig vom Rest.
samely (2015-12-22 14:24:22+00:00): Those buildings need to be improved: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386468808/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386468804/history
jinalfoflia (2015-12-28 07:29:35+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. These are my corrections. Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36213237
GerdP (2015-12-19 06:32:57+00:00): Hi there!
I found a typo highway=fi :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386470730
I am not sure what is meant, there are also some highway=service close to it.
sfedor (2015-12-19 07:39:42+00:00): Thank you. It should be highway=footway. I have fixed the typo.
GerdP (2015-12-19 10:15:22+00:00): OK, thanks for the quick feedback :-)
mavl (2015-12-18 15:13:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление информации.  
Возможно, неправильно указан адрес. На сайте указан:
Тюмень, ул. Республики, 255а, стр. 1  
В OpenStreetMap указан:  
Тюмень, ул. Республики, 255а.  
  
В OpenStreetMap в номерах домов принято указывать прописные буквы, то есть 255А.
Если магазин занимает не всё здание полностью, то нужно добавить внутрь здания новую точку и теги магазина  присвоить ей.  
  
Значение тега opening_hours указано неправильно. В нём не должно быть букв русского алфавита. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=ru  
  
Тег phone тоже неверно заполнен.  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone?uselang=ru
tryzoloft (2015-12-22 05:03:19+00:00): Спасибо за комментарии!

Вы, я вижу, уже поправили. Спасибо и за это :)
mavl (2015-12-22 06:19:39+00:00): Это вам спасибо. Да, я немного подправил данные:  
добавлена для магазина отдельная точка;  
изменены значения тегов phone и opening_hours;  
удалён тег operator: в нём было имя человек (это допустимо), но чаще там указывают обслуживающую компанию http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:operator Если эта информация для вас важна, то добавьте её.  
добавлен главный вход в здание;  
добавлены проезды к зданию;  
добавлены данные о количестве этажей здания;  
  
Осталась неясность с адресом здания.  
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101691377
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3902872076
tryzoloft (2015-12-22 08:06:43+00:00): Поправил вроде. 
Там реально адрес 255А Строение 1.
mavl (2015-12-22 09:32:01+00:00): Адрес лучше указать на здании в виде addr:housenumber=255А с1  

(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:Key:addr&uselang=ru)  
  
С точки магазина адрес лучше убрать, так как у магазина и здания адрес один и тот же. Дублирование информации усложняет поддержку данных в актуальном состоянии.
tryzoloft (2015-12-23 05:48:14+00:00): Вроде убрал, добавил через addr
mavl (2015-12-23 06:26:06+00:00): Я ещё вчера удалил дубликат адреса с точки магазина [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36106758]. Адрес был указан только на здании. Это обычная практика в OpenStreetMap. Сегодня вы добавили тег "addr:housenumber" на точку магазина, который мне (или другим участникам) снова придётся удалить. Вам не нужно переживать на этот счёт: ваш магазин найдут и по адресу, и по запросу спортивных магазинов.
tryzoloft (2015-12-23 08:31:46+00:00): Спасибо!
SomeoneElse (2015-12-18 23:32:41+00:00): The previous mapping of "designation=right_of_way" here was based on the signage (as of June 2014) - I should have added a specific source for it!  I suspect that it'll only get "fixed" when DCC decides to properly classify what sort of right of way it really is, and signs accordingly.  There are already somewhat unofficial-looking signs north of the Lathkill suggesting no vehicular access to the ford, so I'm guessing when DCC get through their CROW act backlog it'll end up as a bridleway.  It's a bit like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230688755 , although the signage here is "right of way" not "public right of way".
Alecs01 (2015-12-19 15:16:19+00:00): Ciao, per favore non disegnare oggetti inesistenti, se salvi le modifiche finiscono nel db di OSM e sono visibili a tutti. Grazie. Alessandro
zurbzurbzurb (2015-12-18 12:39:54+00:00): This changeset should be reverted (the bar addition is ok, but unrelated nodes were damaged); there doesn't seem to be a way to do that through the web editors?
SomeoneElse (2015-12-18 14:39:41+00:00): Hi,
I've reverted it, and undeleted the bar https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3898185143 .  Is everything OK now?

There isn't a way to revert whole changesets via either of the web editors, but there are a couple of ways of doing it externally, such as with JOSM's "revert changeset" plugin.

People look at local recent changeset discussion comments and so mentioning something there is one way to ask for help; another would be to ask in one of the IRC channels.  See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC - there are people in the #osm and #osm-gb IRC channels most of the time.

Oh (belatedely) - welcome to OpenStreetMap!
zurbzurbzurb (2015-12-20 17:35:54+00:00): Brilliant, thank you! All looks good now. I'll look at JOSM for future use.
maraf24 (2015-12-21 00:50:15+00:00): Poprawiłem.
uryevich (2016-03-04 10:48:56+00:00): В этом пакете удалён building=yes с зданий шлюза: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43129164
Наверное ошибка?
flohoff (2015-12-19 10:26:48+00:00): Hi,
diesen change verstehe ich nicht. Nach meinem verständniss muss das noexit=yes auf den letzten node eines weges und nicht mittenrein. So zeigt das vielleicht ein schild an - das wäre dann aber traffic_sign= ... So wird das wieder in osmose auftauchen als noexit although multiple roads ...

Flo
acubens71 (2015-12-18 14:20:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi supprimez-vous des chemins ?
morpheus1885 (2015-12-18 19:37:10+00:00): Bonjour,
je les supprime car ils n'existent pas
acubens71 (2015-12-18 20:05:49+00:00): Ben si, ils existent...
morpheus1885 (2015-12-18 21:13:48+00:00): Désolé mais non ce ne sont pas des chemins...
acubens71 (2015-12-19 12:17:31+00:00): Ce ne sont pas des chemins en tant que tel certes, mais des voies d'accès privées pour la plupart, donc si ils existent. Vous n'avez aucune raison valable de les enlever, merci donc de cesser ce genre de modifications.
joost schouppe (2016-01-13 07:37:11+00:00): Hi Renaud,
Thanks! But is this path really called "Chemin vers la chapelle"? Yoiu put that as "name", but that's only used for official names in the case of roads and paths.
Renaud Brion (2016-01-16 14:27:27+00:00): Hi, 
No, this is an unofficial name, my mistake.
joost schouppe (2016-01-17 09:55:27+00:00): Great, thanks for following up!
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:05:09+00:00): 已經開始蓋了還是變平地了?
GerdP (2015-12-19 06:42:29+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed the rarely used tag 
highway=tertiary:closed
on this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309011843
Another mapper added 
vehicle:conditional="no @ (2015 Oct 16-2015 Dec 15)"
Does it mean that the road is now closed for all traffic?
Would highway=construction match?
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
Georges62 (2016-02-24 08:46:49+00:00): en cours Mq 24/02/2016
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-30 23:30:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76418251 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36775957 from some time ago (no reply from mapper).
Supaplex (2015-12-30 12:02:35+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
cadsauxk (2016-12-18 17:06:00+00:00): Olá Elias

você aqui colocou uma velocidade máxima de 30 km/h numa estrada de terra. Há mesmo placas limitando a velocidade aqui?

abraço
SomeoneElse (2015-12-24 17:30:18+00:00): How exactly can Youtube be described as a contact mechanism?
Hjart (2016-07-05 18:48:13+00:00): Der er en dublet i på Storegade i Tistrup.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2016-07-05 22:32:44+00:00): Tak rettet.
ToeBee (2015-12-18 20:40:21+00:00): Thank you for adding details to OSM. FYI, a sidewalk would usually be mapped as a "footpath" as opposed to the "Pedestrian street" option you chose. The pedestrian street is intended for things like downtown areas in cities where there are wide roads that are primarily intended for pedestrian traffic. You can see the OSM wiki for more details on this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian vs http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
sinagrae (2015-12-18 20:43:57+00:00): Thank you for the clarification and links.  I am just getting used to OSM and wasn't sure which to choose.  Thanks again.
ToeBee (2015-12-18 23:18:48+00:00): Another useful link is the "Map Features" page on the wiki. The iD editor has presets built in for most common things but if you want more information about a type of object, the map features page can show you where to go: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features

Also, what's up with the hospital in the middle of this block? Is that a real thing? It looks like just residential houses here. That point was imported to OSM from a government source which has a history of being unreliable. It might be misplaced by a few blocks or a historical location. I don't see any large hospital looking buildings in the area so I'm guessing it doesn't exist any more. If this is the case, please nuke it from OSM.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-18 22:15:06+00:00): Something seems a bit odd here.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259614896 is grassland, but it's also part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385502882 .  Is wood correct for this bit of Clumber (I haven't been to this bit south of the lake for ages so maybe adding a note would be the best way forward?).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3898807351 seems to be a duplicate node of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3480997825 .

Also what does "remove self intersection" actually mean - what was intersecting with itself, and why was that a problem?
Hjart (2015-12-20 12:57:40+00:00): Jeg ved ikke om du er klar over det, men Geodatastyrelsens fotos er for kort tid siden blevet opdateret over hele DK, bortset fra Bornholm. Måske du heller ikke er klar over at vi har en dansk OSM postliste: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk.
MittaaDK (2015-12-21 10:49:33+00:00): Jo jeg har været omkring Geodatastyrelsen. 
Når jeg mapper, benytter jeg helst Geodatastyrelsens kort, men tjekker ofte med Bing og benytter nogle gange StreetView hvis er noget som er svært at tolke via de satellit fotos som er til rådighed. 
Som reglen syntes jeg at resultatet virker korrekt og rimelig placeret, men visse områder er virkelig udfordende. Hvis begge kort har en svær vinkel, så forsøger at finde støttepunkter i grundplanet (fx fundamentet på hus), men må erkende at der ofte er tale om et kompromis. Vejføring respekterer jeg (næsten) altid, men det hænder at jeg falder over noget som er direkte forkert/misvisende, og så retter jeg.    

Jeg benytter ID og regner med at Geodatastyrelsens kort automatisk vil blive fornyet i editoren ... hvis det ikke allerede er det?

Er også tilmeldt postlisten, men har dog ikke modtaget noget endnu! Hvor ofte kommer der indlæg?
Hjart (2015-12-21 11:28:27+00:00): Der er et arkiv for postlisten: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-dk/. Den er ikke voldsomt livlig, men alligevel god at have.
Som et alternativ til Streetview (det er bedst at undlade brug af "konkurenters" produkter når vi redigerer OSM) kan anbefales Mapillary (se f.eks. http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vNPfWOez1T5P-5tS4D5dLQ/photo). Der er direkte links bl.a. til redigering i en specialversion af iD og du kan selv bidrage med nye billedsekvenser.
AsgerFrank (2015-12-18 23:59:27+00:00): Niels, Cafe Klinker i Haslev har iflg. FVST  (og /uni) navnelbnr 90394724, men pladsen er allerede optaget af et andet nr., du har rettet til og fra tidligere, så du kan nok bedst selv vælge det rigtige. 
/asger
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-12-19 01:42:15+00:00): Tak, ja FVST har fo cafe Klinter, men den ene har ikke nogen kontrolrapporter, så det må være den anden.
AsgerFrank (2015-12-19 08:13:00+00:00): Nå sådan, ja så er den sikker nok, for cafeen linker også selv til smiley 90394724.
scai (2015-12-18 22:14:04+00:00): "Wehr Lederfabrik Stadtilm", "Wehr Kleinhettstedt", "Wehr Großhettstedt" sind alles keine offiziellen Namen und gehören daher in OSM nicht so benannt. Das kann maximal nach description=*, wenn überhaupt.
Smiljan_02 (2015-12-19 08:25:33+00:00): "Wehr xyz" ist eine genaue Ortsbezeichnung, die bei Anglern und Wasserbauern bekannt ist, auch Behörden führen diese Bezeichnungen ( http://www.thueringen.de/th8/tlug/umweltthemen/wasserwirtschaft/ilm_studie/ ) . Mach in dem Link z.Bsp. mal die Anlage 8 oder 11 auf.
 Es gibt im Netz dazu auch Verzeichnisse mit Flußkilometrierung.
Peter Dobratz (2016-04-30 06:55:36+00:00): Global search and replace is a bad idea.  Was this change discussed anywhere prior to making it?
emacsen (2016-05-02 16:25:41+00:00): It looks like ChrissW-R1 hasn't been active for about two months, so it's unlikely they'll reply. I think a revert of this probably makes sense, and either I can do it or you can Peter.
Peter Dobratz (2016-05-02 18:10:50+00:00): Ok, I've reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39047566
Many of the objects had been subsequently edited and I've resolved to the latest version and then backed out the addition of the "contact:" prefix on various key values that were added by this changeset.
5m4u9 (2015-12-19 05:07:24+00:00): Gracias por añadir al mapa estos datos...

Ten cuidado en algunos errores que cometiste. Los edificios siempre separar de la caminos y calles. Y la calle en la dirección debe ser única y no con esquinas o próximas. No usar abreviaturas en tipos de calles...

gracias nuevamente y pregunta si tienes dudas!
ChehrehBargi (2023-01-11 05:43:43+00:00): سلام
ضمن تقدیر از زحمات شما
این کلمه در تابلوهای شهرداری به صورت بلوار نوشته می‌شود. آیا در مشهد به صورت گویش محلی ثبت می‌کنید؟
تعدادی رو به صورت بلوار برگردانده بودم که به این ویرایش شما رسیدم.
chachafish (2016-01-09 13:05:53+00:00): As to the name of this bus stop. Can you tell me where you found the name? I just walked over there and cannot find the name you placed here.
Skybunny (2016-01-09 17:50:30+00:00): Hello! You'll want to look further back in the history of the bus stop's changes and ask 'Niels Elgaard Larsen'. I was merely changing a bad tag, 'ref:rulan:addr' to 'ref'. The name itself was put there by that person. Hope this helps!
samely (2015-12-22 14:34:04+00:00): Hi. Take a look, there some building inside building issues.
jptolosa (2015-12-21 02:07:47+00:00): Hello,

Lakes Ladoga and Onega are freshwater lakes, they aren't a "sea". tagging natural=coastline is incorrect and it conflicts with tagging natural=water & water=lake.
You can read about this in the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline#What_about_lakes.3F

Regards.
Zverik (2015-12-21 05:40:59+00:00): Hi, I know what these lakes are, and the policy regarding natural=coastline. I see coastlines come and go from the lakes, and I'm fine with it. What I didn't like in your changes, is that they broke coastlines for all these lakes, and it was easier to revert them, than to fix all the errors. Turning coastlines to lakes is just a 10-click operation in JOSM, please be careful next time.
jptolosa (2015-12-21 17:41:21+00:00): Ok, I'm sorry. I will be careful next time.
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2015-12-19 14:25:50+00:00): Wie wirkt sich das auf den X19 Wanderweg aus? Läuft der jetzt auch östlich and  der JVA vorbei wie der Wappen- und der Lutterweg?

http://waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=16&lat=51.98632&lon=8.44602&hill=0#
Marc Hoppe (2015-12-19 16:51:46+00:00): Keine Ahnung, der wird sicher später über die Brücke geführt. Im Moment kommt man da nicht durch. Sobald der Verlauf erkennbar/begehbar ist, werde ich das einzeichnen.