piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Truchin (2022-08-24 08:56:09+00:00): Bonjour Stéphanie 

En fait non (sauf si le panneau d'interdiction de circuler vient d'être déposé) : https://www.google.com/maps/@48.8627785,2.3352831,3a,42y,205.38h,90.68t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFa5vliqgJqu5PRoPKnaoiw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Je corrige 

Thomas
user_6110846 (2022-08-22 09:33:33+00:00): https://obukhiv.info/news/u-rzhishchivskii-tergromadi-pereimenuvali-36-vulitc/
Nawfal85 (2022-09-30 06:58:52+00:00): Hi, why did you change the path and direction of roads in this region and pass them through the building of houses, you know that the satellite imagery is old and all of them are curved paths.
Nawfal85 (2022-09-30 06:59:28+00:00): Hi, why did you change the path and direction of roads in this region and pass them through the building of houses, you know that the satellite imagery is old and all of them are curved paths.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125214239
Nawfal85 (2022-09-30 07:07:44+00:00): Look at this one of them as an example:
https://ibb.co/gDbp5p3
s@jj@d (2022-10-01 09:40:13+00:00): Hello, thank you for your attention
Yes, you are right, I made corrections.
Thanks for your corrections
zstadler (2023-10-12 06:15:11+00:00): שלום מוטי,

תודה על הכדכונים שאתה תורם למפה!

לפני כשנה הוספת באמצעות האפליקציה 
Israel Mapping 
מנע בקר ליד עין תינה שבאצבע הגליל

https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/map/18.00/33.0818/35.6415

מנע הבקר לא נמצא על דרך
האם זו היתה טעות?

בברכה,
זאב
user_21425661 (2024-08-21 08:02:51+00:00): Looks like these roads aren't connected to the buildings. Please could you connect them.
smikhnouski_lyft (2024-08-21 11:05:49+00:00): According to OSM history, the building polygon was added after my edits (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1265843794) For some reason, the roads were left disconnected from it. 
I have now connected these roads with the roof in changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155546435)
Thank you for catching this error!
Best regards, Stepan
user_21425661 (2024-08-21 15:44:52+00:00): How come you didn't add the buildings if you split the ways around them?
smikhnouski_lyft (2024-08-22 11:21:12+00:00): The ways were splitted around the gas station roof visible in the background, according to the osm wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered#:~:text=When%20used%20this%20way%20the%20building%20and%20the%20way%20should%20have%20shared%20nodes%20at%20the%20entry%20and%20exit%20points%20of%20the%20building.%20The%20way%20should%20be%20split%20at%20the%20entry%20and%20exit%20nodes%20and%20only%20the%20part%20covered%20by%20the%20building%20should%20be%20tagged%20with%20covered%3Dyes). The presence of building polygons is not obligatory to split the road that is actually covered by the roof.
The main goal of the Missing Roads project (https://github.com/Test-DCT/OSM-LYFT-DCT/issues/27 ), within the scope of which these edits were made, is to map missing roads to improve navigation. Adding building polygons is out of the project's scope
LockOnGuy (2022-08-23 00:56:56+00:00): Hello Saeed SJ,          
Please use meaningful changeset comments, not just "road imorovements" so people can understand your edit and why did you delete this road. For example, you can say "delete road not present in Sat imagery" so mappers would know why did you delete a road instead of going to investigate the reason.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .         
Best Regards.
Saeed SJ (2022-08-24 04:01:11+00:00): Hello dear "LockOnGuy "
Yes, it is an important point and I will definitely consider this point in the next edits.
With thanks for your attention.
SekeRob (2022-12-04 06:45:34+00:00): Hi

Hope you know rhe solution to this 1 way dead end street problem. Either its dead end and oneway is wrong and needs a noexit on the last node or what i suspect the way does connect to Tartini. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088099348#map=18/45.80320/13.54909
SekeRob (2022-12-04 09:32:47+00:00): Update: Confirmed, the oneway sign belongs to the Poste Italiane parking. The service way is (open) gated, needed no exit at end, per corner sign is vico of Vallentinis civ 68-132.

ciao
Langlaeufer (2022-08-22 09:41:35+00:00): So wie die Fußwege jetzt eingetragen sind kann man entlang der Freiligrathstr. nicht die Uhlandstraße und Liebigstraße überqueren.
Bitte auch die Querungen eintragen.
Nortix08 (2022-08-24 10:06:07+00:00): Danke, habe ich ergänzt.
Langlaeufer (2022-08-24 10:26:17+00:00): August-Bebel-Str. ggf auch noch?
Danke und frohes mappen.
Nortix08 (2022-08-24 11:29:28+00:00): Der Fußweg wird im engeren Sinne nicht fürgeführt. Ist es nicht sinnvoller abgesenkte Bordsteine zu erfassen um so die gedachte Fortführung des Fußweges anzudeuten?
oswa (2022-08-24 12:32:05+00:00): Moin, durch explizites Verbinden der Wege und Straßen ist dies automatisch für Navis als Verbindung interpretierbar. Ohne Verbindung existiert topologisch keine (oder nur auf Umwegen) Route zwischen den gegenüberliegenden Gehwegen.
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-25 19:09:53+00:00): #Failed

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
osmdees (2022-09-01 05:50:49+00:00): Hey, bei der Bearbeitung ist was schief gelaufen. LG

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.94737&lat=51.54626&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
LockOnGuy (2022-08-23 00:47:19+00:00): Hello ali-14, why did you remove the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049308782/history ?
ali-14 (2022-08-24 04:03:05+00:00): Hi, I converted the segments of this part to the square and took the name of the street from the square.
Thank you for your attention and comment.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-24 13:55:23+00:00): Hi,

You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9969492983 to the administrative boundary instead of the road. Routers can only use stop nodes if they're connected to a road. Would you mind fixing it quickly? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-09-09 11:25:00+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125977769
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
borishag (2022-08-22 09:29:29+00:00): Betaalmethoden verwijderd. Cash; KV accepteert geen 0,01 0,02 munten en geen 100, 200, en 500 euro biljetten. Betaalkaarten; KV accepteert alleen Maestro kaarten, Contactloos; Alleen betalingen die via Maestro contactloos gefaciliteerd worden.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_6110846 (2022-08-22 09:33:44+00:00): https://obukhiv.info/news/u-rzhishchivskii-tergromadi-pereimenuvali-36-vulitc/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
hanchao (2022-08-25 05:52:10+00:00): 地块不是这么标的。多看看其他人标的和wiki
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
abakus_uploader (2022-08-22 22:30:48+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-22 22:31:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
davidoskky (2022-08-24 09:34:01+00:00): Hi lcaspari, welcome to osm; try to keep your changes localized if that is possible.
bxl-forever (2022-08-22 11:53:40+00:00): Hello,

It’s nice that you spotted this was actually one single building.

If you want, next time you’d better leave a note and we’ll take care of this.  Merging buildings is not something you can do in the iD online editor; I had to revert your changeset because it corrupted data here by creating a malformed multipolygon.

Happy mapping.
gszkr (2022-08-22 12:11:16+00:00): Możesz wyjaśnić sens tych zmian? Np. wydzielenie dwupasowego odcinka https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088115465 na skrzyżowaniu jako "secondary_link"? Albo zamianę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334054569 na secondary_link, z pozostawieniem końcówki będącej jednopasowym właczeniem do głównej jezdni jako secondary, ale głównej jako secondary_link?
Yunkers (2022-08-27 19:51:50+00:00): To nie do mnie, ale odpowiem. Jest to efekt używania "autostradowego" stylu łączników. Tylko czy na pewno dobrze użyty? Efekt końcowy jest co najmniej mętny
user_2066394 (2022-08-22 11:19:39+00:00): building=* ist verlorengegangen.
citro (2022-08-22 11:31:42+00:00): Danke für die Meldung, das ist mir über's Smartphone passiert und ist berichtigt
Rainero (2022-08-23 07:10:42+00:00): Hm, jetzt ist das Gebäude mit seiner Historie (10 Jahre) gelöscht und neu eingetragen. Das wurde doch aber nicht abgerissen und neu gebaut, oder?  
Du wolltest vermutlich nur die Musikschule löschen?
citro (2022-08-23 07:16:23+00:00): Hallo, richtig. Die Musikschule war doppelt eingetragen und ich hatte versehentlich mit dem Smartphone das ganze Gebäude gelöscht. Ist das schlimm wegen der Historie ?
Das Gebäude ist sicherlich viel älter
Rainero (2022-08-23 07:31:18+00:00): Nicht dramatisch, aber schade.  
Ich habe das nun revertiert und die Musikschulenreste am alten Gebäude entfernt, da war auch noch addr:housename=Musikschule dran, ein Attribut das für Adressen in D nicht verwendet wird (ist für UK). Damit ist die Historie wieder da.  
Schau gerne noch mal drüber, ob das jetzt so ist, wie du's machen wolltest.  

VG,  
Rainer
citro (2022-08-23 08:23:34+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
Danke, schau ich mir später an. Noch eine Frage, Häuser werden hier nicht als POI verwendet, wenn das ganze Gebäude ein POI ist ? Nur mit einem Point ?
Grüße
Hans
Rainero (2022-08-23 20:49:31+00:00): Hallo Hans,
wenn das ganze Gebäude nur ein POI ist, finde ich es schon in Ordnung, die Attribute auf das Gebäude zu legen. Typische Beispiele wären Tankstellen oder Supermärkte auf der grünen Wiese, wo das Gebäude nur für diesen Nutzungszweck errichtet wurde.
Hier sind ja zwei POIs in dem einen Gebäude, die Chiemseer Tafel und die Musikschule, da sind zwei POIs als Punkte besser.
citro (2022-08-23 20:52:30+00:00): Ok, Danke, das habe ich wohl mit addr:housename=Musikschule verwechselt
marczoutendijk (2022-08-22 19:22:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125241795 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk (2022-08-22 19:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125241795 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
SHARCRASH (2022-08-22 10:21:27+00:00): + naturals corrected
Dawid2849 (2022-08-22 12:27:14+00:00): Zapomniałeś o krótkim odcinku (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086792314), ale już poprawiłem.
voltairovicz (2022-08-22 20:15:48+00:00): Dzięki za czujność ;)
marczoutendijk (2022-08-22 19:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125241795 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk (2022-08-22 19:22:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125241795 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
LockOnGuy (2022-08-22 17:23:49+00:00): Hello Bravo Mapper,              
You ignored my request to use better changeset comments at  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124921565 .     
Please use meaningful changeset comments, not just "new" so people can understand what you did. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .       
Best Regards,
kwiatek_123 (2022-08-22 10:38:59+00:00): Czemu tak a nie inaczej?
1. Makowska nie na całej swojej długości jest utwardzona.
2. Asfalt dochodzi do samych torów
3. Przejście jest średnio legalne. To znaczy: Mnóstwo ludzi tamtędy chodzi; raz pojawiła się tabliczka od PKP, że przejście zabronione ale szybko zniknęła (i nie był to wandalizm); maszyniści wiedzą, że tamtędy chodzą ludzie;
4. Przejście nie może być proposed bo nie jest planowane i z tego co wiem to w planach przebudowy nie ma go uwzględnionego (dlatego nie ma węzłów wspólnych z proponowanym torem). 
5. Jak droga jest asfaltowa i kiedyś służyła jako serwisowa to po co została zamieniona na track?
silversurfer83 (2022-08-22 12:51:34+00:00): Hi
Wenn du neue Gebäude hinzufügst, kannst du dir in einem zweiten Fenster die Seite https://www.geoportal.hessen.de/search/ öffnen und dort aus der Katasterkarte die Hausnummer (und Straße) ablesen und direkt hier eintragen. Die Daten sind mittlerweile zur Nutzung freigegeben, also keine Scheu (nur als Quelle angeben nicht vergessen).
Noch einfacher ist es, wenn du direkt mit JOSM arbeitest. Da kannst du die Katasterkarte direkt als Hintergrund einblenden und auch zum Abzeichnen nutzen
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125220709
silversurfer83 (2022-08-22 12:51:35+00:00): Hi
Wenn du neue Gebäude hinzufügst, kannst du dir in einem zweiten Fenster die Seite https://www.geoportal.hessen.de/search/ öffnen und dort aus der Katasterkarte die Hausnummer (und Straße) ablesen und direkt hier eintragen. Die Daten sind mittlerweile zur Nutzung freigegeben, also keine Scheu (nur als Quelle angeben nicht vergessen).
Noch einfacher ist es, wenn du direkt mit JOSM arbeitest. Da kannst du die Katasterkarte direkt als Hintergrund einblenden und auch zum Abzeichnen nutzen
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125220709
PT-53 (2022-08-28 07:38:07+00:00): Hallo  sbelemey,
bei Deiner Berichtigung des Verlaufs dieses Straßenabschnittes 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50904783/history
hast Du diesen Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243507515/history
übersehen. Dieser hängt immer noch an der falschen Stelle.
Berichtigst Du das auch noch?

Grüße
sbelemey (2022-08-29 15:32:20+00:00): Hello, PT-53!
Thanks for your comment. When i fixed dragged node, traffic light was not moved by me. Here you can see the latest traffic light changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125032416#map=19/48.78071/9.25602

best regards,
sbelemey
PT-53 (2022-08-29 15:36:44+00:00): Hallo sbelemey,
daß Du die Ampel nicht - zurück - verschoben hast ist ja gerade der Fehler!
Grüße
sbelemey (2022-08-31 15:44:43+00:00): Hello, PT-53!
Thanks for your comment. I removed traffic signal here (at track road)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125613058#map=19/48.78081/9.25542
also when I fixed dragged node, I added missing traffic signal in the right place
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=243507515#map=19/48.77937/9.24895

best regards,
sbelemey
zuicz (2022-09-03 12:00:21+00:00): DZIĘKI
StefanHRT (2022-08-22 11:09:09+00:00): Hello, Sorry, but  this is a protected green area (Geschützte Grünanlage and regulated by law) and there is no bike access there-->bicycle=no. There is a map where the paths with bike free are shown ;)
RolandHUN_Mapper (2022-08-22 21:23:01+00:00): Üdvözlet!
Sikerült bezárnom az ipari területet jelző multipoligon-ot.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125245495
Privatemajory (2022-08-24 04:35:13+00:00): Bonjour @nicyK19. Ce groupe de modifications a changé une section de route principale (highway=tertiary) en chemin (highway=path). J'ai rétabli cette section (changeset #125295981); la prochaine fois il faut faire attention à ne pas casser le réseau routier principal (highway=primary/secondary/tertiary).
Pol Dellaiera (2022-08-23 07:24:48+00:00): Hello,
This commit introduced this issue in Osmose: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=xxxx&level=2&tags=&fixable=&bbox=4.245807%2C50.543224%2C4.406652%2C50.635239&zoom=16&lat=50.60112&lon=4.33475&issue_uuid=2a7dd696-18b3-a8c7-107f-030bfbab297c
Should we worry about it?
multimob (2022-08-23 07:53:09+00:00): Hi.

stop_area_group relations are mostly a deprecated scheme. Apart from very specific mobility hubs such as interchange stations between two subway lines no-one uses them anymore.

In case somebody wants to use them (properly), they must contain all the stop_area relations of multiple stops.  It contained two members that proved to be duplicates for the same stop.  I removed one duplicate and now we had this problem with "1-member relation" shown by Osmose.

I’ve just removed the stop_area_group here, no need to worry anymore.
Pol Dellaiera (2022-08-23 07:54:40+00:00): Okay, merci :)
Bolt026 (2022-11-07 13:43:00+00:00): Hi :)

Can you please help me understand why should the access be restricted for motor_vehicles on this road? 
I've found this announcement https://vsim.ua/DTP/zaliznichniy-pereyizd-po-franka-perekriyut-na-19-dniv-koli-ta-chomu-11706185.html
where I understand that the road should be closed for traffic only from 9:00 a.m. on November 2 to 6:00 p.m. on November 18. 
Thank you in advance!

Kind regards,
Catalina
literan (2022-08-23 20:09:34+00:00): хотите рекламный текст - что ж , я удалил описание совсем
eggie (2022-08-22 15:03:02+00:00): Dag Webstijlen.. Alle gebouwen zijn import vanuit de BAG en precies ingemeten. Je kunt dus niet naar de daken kijken en dan uitlijnen. Het gaat om het maaiveld. 
Wanneer iets een puntdak heeft tekenen we geen punt op de kaart.
Beter dus de vorm van de gebouwen ongemoeid laten. Ik he b het gebouw weer hersteld. 

MVG
eggie
mot_tom (2022-08-23 18:03:36+00:00): Hi Russ, I'm pretty sure these roads are connected. 

The plan is shown on this map though I'll admit it's not very clear [https://www.elor.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ELOR-A64-Junction-Overview.pdf].

There's also been lots of discussion on the Sabre forum about this junction eg [https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7384&start=20], and looks like the consensus there is that there aren't any bridges at this junction. 

Happy to be corrected. 
mot_tom
Russ (2022-08-23 18:25:42+00:00): Thanks, you're right - I've reverted that change. I didn't have time to look into it thoroughly and it seemed weird on account of the traffic lights not being mapped.

There are still some slip lanes missing, which I don't have time to correct at the moment.

There's a better plan in the planning application - https://publicaccess.leeds.gov.uk/online-applications/ reference 17/04351/LA document "HIGHWAYS GENERAL ARRANGEMENT (6 OF 11)". Confusingly it's rotated 90 degrees.

I believe the A58 roundabout also needs more work but it should at least be routable.

Cheers,

Russ
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-08-22 12:41:09+00:00): Ups! Danke! :-)
eggie (2022-08-22 15:05:25+00:00): Svp..
Het gebouw had ik weer hersteld.. Je wordt op het verkeerde been gezet door satellietbeelden. Overigens is het een schuingenomen luchtfoto die je gebruikt. 
Graag gebouwen ongemoeid laten.
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 18:14:06+00:00): Hello!

You used
tee=blue 2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087213809/history

Have you maybe meant
tee=blue
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
tastrax (2026-03-29 07:08:56+00:00): Hi Mateusz,

If you check the history you will see I was changing the incorrect name tagging but adding the tee key. It may well be correct but only the original editor will know.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-06 10:41:05+00:00): see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125337826
Dimitar155 (2022-08-29 07:56:56+00:00): Здравей balkanyug,

Може ли да погледнеш сградите около https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088142460? Повечето линии в района са качени два пъти и липсват тагове.

Поздрави,
Митко
marc__marc (2026-01-20 19:32:28+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9969846014
are you really willing to se that a this picnic table isn't heated or it's a copy/paste error from opendata ?
I fixed 0 into no. feel free to review it.
Regards,
Marc