piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Alecs01 (2016-03-04 18:56:30+00:00): e perchè lo devi cancellare se è un semplice marciapiede? non lo capisci che è vandalismo? i marciapiedi sono highway=footway + footway=sidewalk se non ti piacciono non li mappare, ma almeno evita di cancellarli, è l'ennesima volta che te lo chiedo
fedc (2016-03-06 17:10:27+00:00): Il marciapiede è una parte della strada, non è una strada a sè.
Qui era stato mappato come "percorso pedonale", quindi tutt'altra cosa.
Alecs01 (2016-03-06 18:17:01+00:00): No, non ci siamo capiti, sono MESI che te lo ripeto, anche i marciapiedi in OSM ("parte della strada" non so cosa significhi secondo te). I marciapiedi qualcuno può anche decidere di mapparli se vuoi, è una cosa normale, si taggano highway=footway + footway=sidewalk (269 mila occorrenze in taginfo) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks quindi per favore, se altri li fanno non li cancelli, anche se non ti piacciono, rispetta per favore il lavoro altrui, io francamente non so più come dirtelo, ho perso il conto delle volte che l'ho scritto
mavl (2019-03-09 16:09:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-09 16:09:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Alecs01 (2016-03-04 18:57:39+00:00): Questo è soltanto spam, fermati per cortesia - this is pure spam, please stop
mavl (2019-03-09 16:09:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-09 16:09:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-09 16:09:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:24:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:24:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:24:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:24:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
malenki (2016-04-16 00:54:06+00:00): Hallo neoLithos,
was ist deine Quelle für die Hausnummern der Reihenhaussiedlung?
Bei einer Vor-Ort-Begehung gerade eben konnte ich an den östlicheren Gebäuden keine sehen.
malenki (2016-04-30 14:05:55+00:00): Haben das in RL geklärt: Auskunft ortskundiger Personen.
WillemK_OSM (2016-11-29 17:08:45+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/790796
d1g (2016-03-09 04:05:33+00:00): Hello!

I plan to re-add Equator and Modern prime meridian, because there were never agreement on "constructed geometries" in the past.

Personally, I don't think that this is THAT important.

Similar objects in the past include

name=Geographic South Pole
-90,0, 0,0
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2480805007

name=Antimeridian
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3237094

Other discussions mentioned in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37590347
woodpeck (2016-03-09 06:41:23+00:00): Please don't add constructed geometries to OSM. They will be removed and, if you continue to disregard this rule, your account will be blocked.
d1g (2016-03-09 09:37:26+00:00): > They will be removed 


> disregard this rule
This isn't OSM rule. There no community agreement on this.

You clearly disrespect all discussions about this topic.

And repeating very same statement about "constructed geometries" without any proofs or explanation where or when it was discussed.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Etiquette
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53849
d1g (2016-03-09 10:41:14+00:00): Hello again!

Please, explain your concerns why Anti-meredian should be in OSM(http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3237094) , but Prime meridian isn't?

Russian speaking users would like to hear your point, if you have any.

ATM, we don't have good explanation to enter only one half and not to enter other half of named objects.

N. and S. pole points are also "constructed"?!
woodpeck (2016-03-09 10:47:24+00:00): You are right, the Anti-Meridian is similarly constructed and hence I have removed it. Because of the limitations of our software, those parts of the A.M. that intersect administrative boundaries had to remain.
d1g (2016-03-09 10:57:24+00:00): Excuse me,
>  is similarly constructed 

but it makes no sense for South pole:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2480805007/history

Wikipedia says:
The geographic coordinates of the South Pole are usually given simply as 90°S, since its longitude is geometrically undefined and irrelevant. When a longitude is desired, it may be given as 0°

If it they entered before, then it is possible to process them, please clarify if this is untrue.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/18154051

If only some software cannot process data with 90 coords (or 0 or 180), then we should fix software, not to "correct" databased in the wrong way (IMO)
GerdP (2016-03-10 13:45:38+00:00): Hi there!
Please review : You've created a highway=bus here. That was probably a typo, but I am not sure what is correct.
JoeSmith (2016-03-05 10:59:59+00:00): Hallo wsay22, leider sind Deine Edits überhaupt nicht gut und werden keinesfalls besser. Betrachte diese Nachricht bitte als letzte Aufforderung, damit aufzuhören.
Polarbear (2016-03-13 00:43:31+00:00): Hallo, der Saal http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4040772020 sollte als amenity=community_centre bezeichnet werden. Die Art kann dann mit community_centre=* näher beschrieben werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:community_centre
geoeki (2016-03-14 12:28:12+00:00): Danke, danach habe ich gesucht, aber nicht gefunden! Ist korrigiert.
maraf24 (2016-03-05 20:10:23+00:00): Please read discussion in the following changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34066712
user_5359 (2016-03-07 20:40:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
user_5359 (2016-03-07 20:32:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. And don't added private information (like Grandma house).
user_5359 (2016-03-07 20:29:16+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
user_5359 (2016-03-07 20:28:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added the information twice. And please take a look to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299142742 (added for more as a year). The description as an error, but the better information.
user_5359 (2016-03-07 20:15:30+00:00): I think, that "Unwined Candle Company" isn't the name of the building. Please add office=company or shop=candle to your information.
user_5359 (2016-03-07 20:07:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours . If you need help: You are welcome.
user_5359 (2016-03-07 19:30:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You override a existing building with our information. I move your additional information to the existing building and deleted yours.
user_5359 (2016-03-07 20:37:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You insert of the High School overrides an existing, better information. I deleted your information.
alphensebezorger (2016-07-01 18:03:55+00:00): Blijkbaar is hier iets fout gegaan: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/611519
3ngineer (2020-04-23 00:52:54+00:00): I do not think the little connecting power line running west/east under the larger lines exists, I will double check within a month in person.
3ngineer (2020-04-28 05:18:06+00:00): Yes, there is a single cable, it is lowest on the pole.
emj (2016-03-04 23:59:10+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/522969
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-06-14 13:49:57+00:00): I don't think that's a soccer pitch, I've changed it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49527802
mhenson (2016-03-06 04:31:37+00:00): read to help with access times
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Access_time_and_other_conditional_restrictions
mhenson (2016-03-06 04:33:29+00:00): If this is to much for you, I will take it on soon. I do not want to overwhelm you.
rfrancis (2016-03-06 08:11:14+00:00): In fact I did read that page, which is where I got what I did put, but of course I would be glad of any correction to it.  I promise I have no ego about it. :)
luschi (2016-07-30 19:43:25+00:00): opening_hours enthält Fehler.
"opening_hours=Mo-Sa 11:45-14:00,17:30-21:00; Su off" wäre richtig!
ebenso gibt es keinen cuisine_1 tag.
hier solltest du "cuisine=regional;italian" verwenden!
Bitte korrigiere deine Fehler
luschi (2016-07-31 12:09:05+00:00): ebenso ist der tag "season" den du bei allen Hotels und Gastbetrieben verwendest falsch.
"ganzjährig, außer 24.12.-11.01." kann man ebenso in opening_hours erfassen1
geow (2016-07-31 20:07:04+00:00): Die korrekte Syntax für die Öffnungszeiten findet ihr bei http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours und praktsiches Tool zur Generierung/Prüfung der Werte ist http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Warin61 (2019-08-02 08:40:13+00:00): Hi,

You have tagged sport here as tennis. These look too small to be tennis? Possibly volleyball??

I have separated out the netball courts. And made a single small court for the number of small courts that exist. It needs a sport tag and then to be copied ... The new way is number 709885620.
geoaria (2019-01-27 17:07:44+00:00): از جاده درجه در نو.احی روستایی استفاده نکنید در خود روستا برای ترسیم کوچه ها ار تگ residential استفاده نمایید
Leon K (2016-03-05 23:41:04+00:00): Just an FYI, a couple of pieces of the Hunter River relation were removed at some point which broke the relation.  
 
Not sure where or when or how it happened, but these comments made me think they could be related.
user_5359 (2016-03-07 19:10:49+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
synalik (2016-09-03 08:41:21+00:00): Ahoj georgo21,
všimol som si, že si v marci zakresľoval cyklotrasy v okolí Dubnice nad Váhom.
Poprosím Ťa, keby si ich poopravoval podľa tohto návodu: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Slovakia/Cycle_routes
Konkrétne sa jedná o to, že v reláciách treba zmeniť parameter Name na Description a hodnotu RCN na LCN. Toto sa týka len tých ciest, ktoré nemajú pridelené číslo od SCK (a námatkovo som pozrel, že máš v v source uvedené "gpx provided by MAS Vršatec") - jedná sa teda o lokálne trasy, nie o regionálne.
Ďakujem
braňo
Tomas_J (2022-07-12 20:30:22+00:00): Zdravim, bol som dnes v terene a tuto trasu som nenasiel. Mas prehlad o diani v terene? Je to tato trasa - https://www.bevlava.cz/? Ak ano, mozem ju zaznacit do mapy, ale tvoje trasovanie modrej cyklotrasy by som chcel na par miestach zmanit a cyklotrasu premenovat. Cyklotrasu https://www.bevlava.cz/ som v terene nasiel a je suvislo vyznacena a zhoduje sa na 95 % s tvojou modrou trasou. Dalsia otazka - preco si robil pre modru cyklotrasu tolko relacii a nie je pre celu trasu jedna suvisla relacia? Dik za upresnenie.
Владимир К (2016-03-25 07:42:22+00:00): Hello! How did you get the japanese name for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/802437316 ?
whb (2016-03-26 22:57:47+00:00): Wurde die Greif-Apotheke wirklich geschlossen?
Das Schaufenster ist noch eingerichtet und es gibt keinen Hinweis (z.B. Aushang) auf eine Schließung.
Ich war allerdings außerhalb der angegebenen Öffnungszeiten dort.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/323191870/history
whb (2016-03-28 10:01:43+00:00): Die Apotheke wurde nicht geschlossen!
rza31 (2016-03-28 16:19:26+00:00): Apotheke versehentlich gelöscht. ;-)
Hjart (2016-03-05 10:24:17+00:00): Det ser ikke ud til at du er klar over at du ved at trykke 'Q' efter du er færdig med en bygning kan gøre den pænt retvinklet.
vici (2016-03-05 10:42:43+00:00): Det har du ret i, tak for tippet. Ved du hvor finder jeg mere information om genvejstaster og lignende?
Hjart (2016-03-05 10:47:53+00:00): I Potlatch er der er en 'Hjælp' knap oppe i venstre hjørne, lige ved siden af 'Gem' knappen
mavl (2019-03-11 16:24:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
CloCkWeRX (2017-05-24 05:04:30+00:00): Thoughts on classification of Ringwood Bypass (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/979260) ?
Alecs01 (2016-03-05 15:09:25+00:00): reverted
mavl (2019-03-11 16:24:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:24:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Alecs01 (2016-03-05 15:09:35+00:00): reverted
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Alecs01 (2016-03-05 15:10:18+00:00): reverted
Alecs01 (2016-03-05 15:10:28+00:00): reverted
Alecs01 (2016-03-05 15:10:38+00:00): reverted
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Ewen Hill (2016-03-05 10:32:25+00:00): That actually is the Alpine National Park uploaded from Data.vic apart from the top north due to size.
Warin61 (2017-03-26 06:01:13+00:00): This Relationship 6026831 - multipolygon does not have any tags that will make it render ... 
I think it would be safe to delete, the outer way has been removed by someone else so restoring it will take some work .. and as it has no effect on the map probably not worth the effort?
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-13 13:12:00+00:00): Re https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/issues/554 , is there any reason why http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6026949 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6026950 are relations rather than just ways which happen to share nodes along the border?
Alternatively, if they're really the same building shouldn't there be just one building way (the outer way for the building) with two ways inside it, one for each school?
As currently mapped, it's not "wrong" - just confusing for future mappers to edit, and for data processors (such as renderers) to process.
grin (2016-03-17 12:52:11+00:00): This is an interesting discussion which desires a more verbose medium than this comment section. As I have replied in the issue: it is a matter of taste whether one avoids multipolys or not and definitely not a policy or a technical requirement. I'm sure there has been a discussion of multiple overlapping ways vs. non-closed multipoly members but I'm also pretty sure there wasn't any conclusion, so it's still a matter of taste. (Similarly I haven't been able to find how to map multiple large POIs inside a larger building, apart from indoor mapping schemes.) When a construct is valid it should be handled by OSM processing systems no matter how unexperienced editors may be confused by it (they can be confused by lots of things in the db indeed).

Technically this object now represents the "avoid overlaps" believers: the one physical building is shared between two entities: one half is school, other half is governmental, and there is no connection inbetween but a shared inner wall. I cannot even change the outer edge to _one_ poly since half of it belongs to school and half to the gov't multipoly. (And no reason to use building:part since the physical building have the same attributes.)

All in all I understand your points, I agree with their subjective reasoning and I opt not to use them here, since the current construct is just as valid and should be handled, and it's a good test case that way. :-) 
(As you may have noticed just 20m north of the school I have tagged POIs as nodes inside the simple poly building, and I usually do it that way.)
Nakaner (2016-03-06 19:27:18+00:00): Hallo MMGH125,

danke, dass du die alten, gammligen Tags wie grade_of_track=* entfernt hast, ohne gleich einen "bösen" mechanischen Edit durchzuführen. Aber bitte tue es so, dass keine Informationen, für die es ein "neues" Tag gibt, verloren geht.

An diesem Way hast du z.B. tilting_technology=* entfernt, ohne railway:tilting=* zu ergänzen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168981566 (Über deine Entfernung von lzb=no, für welches es railway:lzb=no gibt, kann man sich streiten.)

Es wäre nett, wenn du das wieder korrigieren würdest. Danke.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Adam_Piszczek (2016-03-08 21:27:34+00:00): tutaj trzeba dodać ścieżke bo brakuje,aby dodać szlak
VA00 (2016-03-09 19:38:07+00:00): Tutaj czyli gdzie?
Adam_Piszczek (2016-03-09 20:07:33+00:00): teraz jej nie dodasz musisz mieć ślad ścieżki z gps ,tam jest ścieżka przy tej trawie,kiedyś tam boisko było ,ostatnio dodałem ale  inne,jest tam ścieżka,szlak też jest zaznaczony w tym lesie,http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2305626#map=18/50.11708/19.41775
VA00 (2016-03-10 06:14:55+00:00): Przez boisko formalnie nie ma przejścia, właściciel przegania. Od strony Stelli jest usypana zapora z gruzu. Potem faktycznie jest kilka znaków na drzewach, ale ścieżka praktycznie zaniknęła. Następnie docieramy do ogrodzonej szkółki leśnej, przez którą kiedyś biegł szlak.
Adam_Piszczek (2016-03-10 08:12:19+00:00): to boisko jest jeszcze?to czemu go nikt tu nie zaznaczył,a dawno tam nie byłem,to tak się tam pozmieniało,jeśli operator szlaku PTTK to musi wyznaczyć w tym rejonie jakiś inny przebieg tego szlaku
VA00 (2016-03-10 09:16:05+00:00): Z Twojej wypowiedzi wynika, że słabo orientujesz się w sytuacji chrzanowskich szlaków rowerowych. Od prawie 10 lat są bezpańskie, wszelkie starania o ich poprawę spełzły na niczym. Nawet nie wiadomo w czyim są zarządzie, na pewno nie PTTK. Podobnych korekt na czarnym szlaku potrzebnych jest z dziesięć, ale urzędnicy mają to w .... pozostawienie przerwy w szlaku jest najuczciwszym sposobem pokazania tej sytuacji na mapie.
Adam_Piszczek (2016-03-17 17:59:35+00:00): nie wiem jakie boisko masz na myśli,bo to boisko było dawno jak jeszcze szkoła zawodowa tam była,a obecnie tam boiska nie ma jest łąka,a ta szkółka leśna to raczej ogrodzony teren na którym rosną drzewa do zalesienia lasu.A co do szlaków to wiem o nich troche ale tymi szlakami nie jeżdże i wydaje mi się że mało kto lub wcale nimi nikt nie jezdzi
Capello13 (2016-03-17 10:13:22+00:00): Bonjour,
Quelles sont vos sources pour les ajouts des nombreux noms de voie sur le département de la Haute Vienne? Cherchant à en ajouter moi même il y en a un certain nombre que je ne trouve pas sur le cadastre.
Pour être passé à côté sans m'arrêter, le way 259363169 à un nom commençant par "Impasse de ..." et non "Nouaillas" qui est le lieu-dit déclaré grâce à ce point : 3883813503.
De même la cité Raoul Dautry semble être plutôt un quartier dont fait partit les rues Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier, Issac Newton et Blaise Pascal qu'une rue.
Cordialement,
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Peda (2016-04-24 10:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Ogmios (2016-03-06 20:19:55+00:00): 👍
mavl (2019-03-11 16:25:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:26:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:26:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-11 16:26:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-12 16:11:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-12 16:11:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-12 16:11:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Peda (2016-04-24 10:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
eggie (2018-06-08 16:43:20+00:00): Nog gen welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Takuto (2016-04-26 13:02:04+00:00): Привет. Можно вопрос, на каком основании у д. Мстихино отобран статус деревни? Она находится на территории ГО Калуга, но статус НП у нее никто не отнимал. Улицы так же принадлежат деревне, а не городу.
Kostik (2016-04-26 14:47:50+00:00): Привет. В чём вопрос именно ко мне? Я тока перенёс теги с точки на границу. Задай вопрос автору правки: www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37057846
Takuto (2016-04-27 05:19:20+00:00): В истории такие вещи не показываются, в комментарии тоже. Спасибо что прояснили ситуцию.
Владимир К (2016-03-15 10:35:38+00:00): Для обозначения деревьев лучше использовать natural=wood, чем landuse=forest, потому что он очень неоднозхначный и везде используется по-разному.
sergeybe (2016-03-15 15:12:20+00:00): Да, согласен что не однозначен, но пока альтернативы для пометки лесопосадок нет. Тег managed=yes плохо приживается https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/managed Для лесопосадок лучше оба эти тега выставлять. К сожалению в Mapnik отказались от отображения лесопосадок. А жаль, очень полезная информация для туристов и грибников.

Может мне стоит сделать скрипт и довавить natural=wood для всех landuse=forest в Крыму?
Владимир К (2016-03-16 07:10:31+00:00): Ну, если есть уверенность что landuse=forest по всему крыму обозначает именно деревья, то может быть) в принципе и managed=yes не помешает, если известно. тогда можно будет потом легко перейти на другую схему. А вообще, я не знал, что вы так отмечаете именно лесопосадки, и везде где видел, исправлял тупо на natural=wood
sergeybe (2016-03-16 12:54:38+00:00): Я несколько лет назад пробегался по лесам в Крыму и проверял, есть ли тег  landuse=forest и это не является лесопосадками, и исправлял на natural=wood. В Крыму с landuse=forest должно быть все нормально. Раньше была проблема с редактором iD, в котором landuse=forest был описан как "Лес" это вносило долю путаницы.

Я посмотрел как сейчас сделано описание в редакторе iD.
Сейчас тег landuse=forest описан как  "Обслуживаемый лес или лесопосадки.", а natural=wood как "Лесистые территории без лесопользования". Так что я думаю, что natural=wood излишен, если есть тег landuse=forest.

Пожалуйста не меняйте landuse=forest, он очень полезен особенно если есть пометки лесополос около туристических троп.
Владимир К (2016-03-17 06:46:09+00:00): ага, не буду :) интересно, какой смысл различать естественный лес и лесопосадки? вот туристу какой прок?)
sergeybe (2016-03-17 13:43:21+00:00): Все просто :) Это хороший ориентир в сплошном лесу, да и лесники очень сердятся, если развести костер в лесопосадках. Лучше подальше от них вставать на лагерь.
Adam_Piszczek (2016-03-08 21:24:16+00:00): potwierdzam,i nadodatek kamienista
mavl (2019-03-12 16:11:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-12 16:11:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-12 16:11:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-12 16:11:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Kartograf_udm (2016-03-07 06:45:31+00:00): Критерий здесь такой (согласно вики-документации): если реку нельзя перепрыгнуть (что соответствует ширине ~2 м), то её следует отмечать тегом waterway=river. Поэтому откатил эту правку.
Ivan Sterkhov (2016-03-09 15:22:13+00:00): Ориентировался на http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D1%8B
Но как оказалось описание в таблице не соответствует описанию конкретных тегов