piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
danieldegroot2 (2022-05-06 20:30:04+00:00): Hey moszkva ter,

You have gotten multiple comments regarding good changeset comments, but so far have ignored them.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=495146

Continuing to use these bad changeset comments may be considered as spam.

Reply to this comment, please. This way other users will know you are reading it.

Regards,

Daniel
eggie (2022-05-06 18:51:12+00:00): Lastig om evt fouten te zien. Ik draai dan de validator van editor JOSM. Ik heb wat overlappende landuse hersteld. 
Gr eggie
user_5359 (2022-05-13 08:06:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631947547/history (one of fifteen). What is the meaning of the tag accc=private. The access key exists before.
felipeeugenio (2022-05-13 13:19:17+00:00): Thanks again.
It is merely a mistype of some sort. I´ll correct it.
regards
EneaSuper (2022-05-21 12:13:28+00:00): Qui invece mi sono permesso di apportare correzioni alle stazioni ferroviarie di Sampierdarena, Pontedecimo e Piano Orizzontale dei Giovi.

Questo è quanto, temevo che ci sarebbe voluto molto più tempo per sistemare tutto, ma alla fine hai fatto solo qualche errore comunque in buona fede 😃

Ciao e buon proseguimento 😁
eggie (2022-05-06 19:17:57+00:00): Tom.. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadster. Daar beter niets aan wijzigen. Je hebt een aantalgebouwen verwijderd die geïmporteerd waren als building=construction en dan als woning en niet als zonnepaneel. Zij deze woningen nooit gebouwd? 
Gebouwen die er wel staan niet gaan aanpassen svp mbv een luchtfoto. Dat klopt vaak niet bij schuin genomen foto's. Het is niet de plek waar het gebouw staat op maaiveldniveau.
Gr eggie 
eggie
eggie (2022-05-06 19:23:11+00:00): Zaken die niet kloppen kun je dpprgeven aan het Kadster via deze site
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Koningin%20Wilhelminalaan%2017%20Wilhelminaoord&resultOffset=0&objectId=1701100000246200&geometry.x=206822.80800257&geometry.y=542686.99799915&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1701010000246202
eggie (2022-05-06 19:23:34+00:00): typo >> doorgeven aan het Kadaster
eggie (2022-05-06 19:26:39+00:00): De woningen die je hebt verwijderd zijn waarschijnlijk ingeplande woningen waar de bouw vertraagd is?
Nog niet ingemeten.
eggie (2022-05-06 19:32:52+00:00): Die landuse waar je water van had gemaakt heb ik teruggetagd naar landuse grass. Je zou daar de sloten apart in kunnen tekeken. Vauit het zuiden heb ik er al een paar gedaan.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-05-06 19:36:12+00:00): Die woningen die zo groot ingetekend zijn hebben het probleem dat ze nog niet ingemeten zijn. Elke import vanuiot de bSG gaat dan verkeerd. Vraag aan het kadaster of ze hunb administratie bijwerken. Voorlopig kun je de woningen wel met de hand aanpassen en de contruction verwijderen. Voorbeeld nr 47b pas ik nu aan.
eggie (2022-05-06 19:39:01+00:00): 47b aangepast. Ik gebruik dan als achtergrond de BGT omtrekgericht.
De BAG loopt gewoon achter dus het Kadaster zal zijn zaken op orde moeten krijgen.
eggie (2022-05-06 19:53:21+00:00): Nog een paar woningen uitgelijnd. Als voorbeeld wat sloten ingetekend
eggie (2022-05-06 20:09:21+00:00): De verwijderde 'zonnepanelen' waren dus gewoon die schuren / garages??  die nog niet ingemeten waren.
Lejun (2022-05-09 10:01:26+00:00): Disons que c’est une question de point de vue.

Comme indiqué, le stationnement était informel (bicycle_parking=informal), je suppose sur les barrières disposées devant les entrées. Je dis pas qu’il faut le faire ou pas, c’est seulement à titre indicatif.

Personnellement j’ai pas envie de requalifier en parking informel tous les trottoirs de la ville.
oongiw (2022-05-09 10:15:51+00:00): En vrai il n'y a même pas de mobilier urbain précisément à cet endroit. Rien pour attacher un vélo. De plus il y a une porte d'accès à l'immeuble juste là.
Lejun (2022-05-09 10:50:20+00:00): Y avait pas des barrières en croix aux entrées ici ?
oongiw (2022-05-09 11:11:22+00:00): Peut-être par le passé ou un peu plus loin dans la rue, mais pas ici.
Lejun (2022-05-09 09:51:41+00:00): Pas de soucis sur ce groupe de modifications, roulez jeunesse !
Lejun (2022-05-09 09:50:42+00:00): Salut, merci pour la contribution, quelques erreurs s’y sont glissées.

– Sauf erreur il s’agit toujours d’un bâtiment, il faut enlever area et laisser la clé building, voire mettre building=retail[1] si occupé uniquement par la boulangerie ;
– Les horaires d’ouvertures ne respecte pas le format consensus[2], il faut le remplacer par « Mo-Sa 06:30-13:30, 16:00-19h30;Su 07:00-13:00 » ;
– Également un soucis de format pour le numéro de téléphone[3], il faut un espace derrière l’indicatif pays donc « +33 5 59 67 54 46 ».

Je t’invite à les corriger et reste à disposition si t’as des questions.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:building%3Dretail
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:phone
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening%20hours
Vinber (2022-05-20 15:48:26+00:00): salut Lejun,
repassant dans le coin, cela n'a pas bougé, j'ai corrigé.

damOs, j'ai ajouté le parking également.

Ne pas hésitez à répondre, nous ne mordons pas !

Vincent
Lejun (2022-05-20 16:32:00+00:00): Merci du coup de main Vinber ! Pour l’instant j’ai pas encore trouvé la bonne organisation pour assurer le suivi de toutes mes demandes de correction.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 13:19:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122579361 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some changes that appear to be mostly vandalism in Iraq.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-13 00:18:30+00:00): Most of these roads exist in some form
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120646043
rab (2022-05-13 17:43:26+00:00): razed:highway=*
but what for?
Palolo (2022-06-07 13:45:31+00:00): Congratulations on your first contribution to OSM.  Next time you edit make sure to look over the instructions for the HOT project. There is no need to add farmland polygons on this task. Thank you
BCNorwich (2022-05-07 09:19:01+00:00): Please don't keep duplicating highways.
BCNorwich (2022-05-08 08:13:34+00:00): Hello, Thanks for responding to my previous comment on Changeset: 120641439
I've now been able to go through all your changes up to and including this changeset. I've removed all the many duplicated sections of highway. I've amended or removed many of the permissive access tags.

As I said duplicate highways seriously disrupt routing. If a way needs amending or correcting it should be done to the existing way. Thus the history of the way is preserved in the OSM database. You ought not delete and redraw a highway, you ought not draw a new way atop of an existing way.

Access is tagged as permissive if one needs to gain permission before proceeding on a way. A highway, even a private highway ought not be tagged access=permissive if it is publicly accessible as I think these highways are. Further, I don't think that cycle access is restricted here as you indicate by adding bycycle=no. Just because you don't see any cycles in the KartaView imagery doesn't mean cycling is prohibited. The same logic applies to the foot=no, horse=no tags on some highways. Is pedestrian access actually banned?

Some of the tags you've added are unnecessary as by their absence they are implied. Like divider=no, parking=no and sidewalk=no, if not tagged these statements are implied.

Lastly, I think there were some occurrences of motor_vehicle=no where vehicles can clearly be seen on KartaView.

I apologise if the above may seem officious but I'm just trying to clearly make statements.

If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
danieldegroot2 (2022-05-06 20:33:10+00:00): Oops, I meant ind_ref => int_ref
Wilmer Osario (2022-05-06 23:45:23+00:00): Hola ¿Qué significa "ESV TAZAJAL 2022"? ¿Puede explicar un poco los cambios que realizó?
abakus_uploader (2022-05-06 22:34:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
literan (2022-05-07 11:52:15+00:00): дорогу к линии метро приклеили https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81484426/history
ynx (2022-05-08 10:44:39+00:00): Спасибо! Поправил.
EdLoach (2022-05-11 13:59:59+00:00): Are you sure school lane should be tagged hgv=no? The LHP still show that a scheme to deter HGVs from using the lane is awaiting funding. https://www.essexhighways.org/highway-schemes-and-developments/local-highway-panels/lhp-scheme-lists/tendring-lhp-schemes-list
EdLoach (2022-05-11 14:01:35+00:00): PS: Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and if hgv=no is correct you might also like to add a maxweight tag if there are signs to indicate a limit
Caroline Hall (2022-05-11 14:47:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for your questions and information.  That is very interesting.  I have been told by a Councillor that funding for this scheme has been agreed in this year's budget, but it is apparent from the Current Year Schemes List that you have just directed me to that this is not the case.   But in any case, School Lane and Grange Road are within the area covered by the Essex County Council (North East Essex) Prohibition of Heavy Commercial Vehicles Order, which prohibits vehicles over 7.5 tonnes (unless delivering etc.), so that seems a valid reason to tag School Lane hgv=no,  even if there is no sign in place yet.
EdLoach (2022-05-12 08:32:05+00:00): Thanks for the reply. Local knowledge is what makes OpenStreetMap so good. And if anyone else wonders about the restriction with no sign hopefully they'll find this discussion too. Best wishes, Ed
Caroline Hall (2022-05-12 09:07:59+00:00): Thanks! Yes, I hope so too.  The Order that I mentioned has applied for a long time (>30 years), so a sign seems very overdue! Caroline
dgitto (2022-05-08 05:04:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=IT:Good_changeset_comments&oldid=2242192
MxxCon (2022-05-07 02:36:43+00:00): Hello.
Once again, please try to map areas to their actual perimeter and not extending to the middle of road. Accurate perimeters are important for multiple reasons, including basic property ownership limits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120648348
MxxCon (2022-05-07 03:03:32+00:00): Additionally, you mapped razed LIRR Rockaway Beach Branch tracks. However, looking at the available satellite imagery, there are no traces of those tracks whatsoever. As such there's no point mapping them. OSM is about what's in the world now, not what once was there. If you want, you are welcome to map these tracks in OHM.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120648348
FlowerHillPerson (2022-05-07 14:35:47+00:00): Hello,

I am sorry for my errors. I had roadways turned off when adding the areas in order to prevent the land use and roadway nodes from connecting and I will be more careful going forward to map to the curb and not to the middle of the road in the area; I got confused as the different image overlays shift the image a bit and so I was unsure where to place them.

I truly and honestly did not know that about razed rail features; I knew about the lines former existence through local knowledge and that was why I added it. I will remember this going forward.

I can assure you that the last thing I want is to be a disruptive editor, and so I appreciate you letting me know all this.

Have a nice day.
MxxCon (2022-05-07 15:05:45+00:00): Not glueing to roads(unless necessary) is a good practice 🙂 but beyond that it's better to map features to what they are in the real world. If there's a school or a park or a construction site or some other clearly defined feature, map them to their actual perimeter which often is demarked with a fence or grass adjacent to sidewalks.🙂👍
Yes, misaligned satellite imagery can be challenging to decide which one is the most accurate. Just do your best guess there. Sometimes turning on gps tracks or streetview layers might be useful to try to estimate which imagery is more aligned.
If you have any questions feel free to ask 👍
MxxCon (2022-05-07 15:15:55+00:00): Also regarding the razed train tracks, consider checking out this article, it talks about it in more details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway
WoodWoseWulf (2022-05-07 06:21:58+00:00): Hi StreetHawk16,

Do you have more information about this memorial? A tag such as historic=memorial may be more relevant than leisure=park.
StreetHawk16 (2022-05-07 12:58:49+00:00): Please remove it. I misunderstood how this worked. I thought I just saved it for my view. I didn't mean to upload it.
user_5359 (2022-05-09 14:55:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951438454. What ist the meaning of the key Name (without any other keys)?
cRaIgalLAn (2022-05-09 16:47:04+00:00): That short way is a section of the boundary of the Wenge Bas Health Area, which is defined by a 14 piece relation. It was inserted by a previous user. I have no reference source for the health area so I can't agree to it or dispute it.  I would idly observe in passing that river banks are unusual boundaries. Most (not all) surveyed boundaries use the thalweg (deepest part) of a river as boundary.
user_8101879 (2022-06-18 17:51:55+00:00): bonjour,

vous semblez confondre les relations waterway (une collection de chemins linéaires) avec les multipolygones (une collection de surfaces).
voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
J'ai réparé vos erreurs sur la relation 8089.
user_5359 (2022-05-07 14:45:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved two nodes over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.

See https://www.osm.org/node/7234316386/history, https://www.osm.org/node/7228212649/history
DressyPear4 (2022-05-07 12:22:29+00:00): Um canteiro central faz com que a via seja de mão dupla sim.
Corrigir tudo daria muito trabalho, logo essa edição foi revertida.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120649026
jaguari (2022-05-07 13:51:21+00:00): reverta sua alteração e eu corrijo as vias. as minhas alterações foram muitas para serem perdidas
DressyPear4 (2022-05-07 15:12:12+00:00): Você já fez outras más edições e ignorou comentário de outros mapeadores, se continuar desse modo será pedido bloqueio de usuário.
http://revert.osmz.ru/
use para reverter.
DressyPear4 (2022-05-07 15:13:42+00:00): Não ignore os alertas do editor, é provável que alguma edição está pendente de revisão e deve ser corrigida antes de ser enviada.
jaguari (2022-05-07 19:42:35+00:00): obrigado
muralito (2022-05-17 19:17:25+00:00): Hola. La ruta 107 es red terciaria.
mikiuy (2022-05-18 00:13:11+00:00): Por que no tiene la misma categoría del tramo que sale de sauce si esta asfaltada
 y es muy transitada?
muralito (2022-05-19 19:50:53+00:00): En OSM la definición que se tomo hace  unos años es que las rutas se clasificaban según jerarquía que les da el MTOP,  salvo algunas excepciones.

Podes verlo aca https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Uruguay#Tipos_de_calles_en_zonas_no_urbanas y no es que sea algo incambiable, se pueden plantear otros esquemas y evaluar si son mas apropiados a la realidad actual.
muralito (2022-05-19 19:51:57+00:00): y el dibujo que hay en el wiki no ayuda siempre, pero el mapa del MTOP se puede consultar en https://geoportal.mtop.gub.uy/visualizador/
CoyKoi (2022-05-06 22:47:28+00:00): I have used the tagging already used for the existing busway. However I note that there is now a "highway=busway" tag for the purpose, but not fully supported yet (it is not rendered by carto)
citrula (2023-04-21 07:23:33+00:00): Hello,

In this changeset you removed the "Hilltop Christian Academy Football Stadium" which was added in the GNIS import. I believe this still exists but is several hundred meters away. Do you have local knowledge which confirms that it is not there?
csimeona22 (2022-05-06 22:52:02+00:00): Mapillary was also used as a source for this edit.
gscholz (2022-06-02 04:27:46+00:00): Hi kseltar,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.51842&lat=-25.36565&zoom=12&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120649446

Can you please fix this?

My impression is, you do not know how to handle multipolygon relations properly. Please educate yourself:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind Regards
Guido
abakus_uploader (2022-05-07 22:45:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
tastrax (2022-05-09 10:53:13+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
user_5359 (2022-05-07 14:39:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the maxspeed value. This value is bigger than the entry of the Guinness World Record Book!
wireguy (2022-05-09 12:40:47+00:00): hi madiener,  this change also broke relation 14114335.   Did you mean to delete this relation too?   Also not sure why all the extra fields are included (like massgis:ARTICLE97).   Can you investigate and correct?
madiener (2022-05-09 14:14:58+00:00): I did not affirmatively add MassGis -- the system must have done that. My memory is that I had to break a relation that was pulling the southern tip down to May St. BTW: here's the Rosemary Lake map: https://www.needhamma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2839/Rosemary-Lake-Trail-Map?bidId=. It's a lot more accurate now compared to before. The outline could be brought around the lake to the dam, but I did not make that change -- the property is really more like a pool area and a woods area.
snopas24 (2022-05-07 01:47:01+00:00): driveway
user_5239402 (2022-05-07 02:46:47+00:00): 안녕하세요.
바뀜집합 댓글을 적어주시기 바랍니다.
"."은 다른 사람들이 무엇을 편집했는지 알 수 없습니다. 댓글을 적지 않으시면 편집 분쟁시 일일히 답글하며 시간을 써야 합니다.
user_5239402 (2022-05-07 02:47:18+00:00): 좀더 구체적으로 적으시기 바랍니다.
user_5239402 (2022-05-07 02:48:26+00:00): 1은 의미가 없습니다. 여기서 무엇을 편집하셨나요?
ChehrehBargi (2023-06-06 08:49:53+00:00): سلام
ضمن سپاس از شما در ثبت تغییرات،
نامی که اضافه کرده اید، به علت ثبت در تابلو شهرداری باید به برچسب اصلی یعنی name منتقل گردد و نام قدیم هم به برچسب old_name انتقال یابد. که انجام شد.
Glassman (2022-05-07 20:36:42+00:00): #TIP: Save and upload edits before moving on to a distant location.

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - I squared your building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120652653
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-20 21:07:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121260282 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some implausible mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6004 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-20 21:06:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121260282 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some implausible mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6004 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-20 21:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121260282 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some implausible mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6004 .
felipeeugenio (2022-05-26 23:52:59+00:00): Alonso, por favor. te hemos pedido varias veces que no pegues los landuses y los parques a las calles. Llevo 15 minutos ya arreglando todo San Carlos. En el verano estuve varios arreglando todo y ahora los cambiaste. Por favor un poco de respecto. Ya estuviste bloqueado mas de un mes por mapeos de mala calidad. cual es la idea?
felipeeugenio (2022-05-27 00:01:01+00:00): Alonso, si se está construyendo un parque, entonces es landuse=construction y constructio=park. No pones el park.

O estás usando OSM para jugar pokemon? porque en las fotos satelitales tampoco se ven contrucciones.
saludos
ivanatora (2022-05-07 06:25:39+00:00): Промяната отразява че зоопаркът вече е функциониращ. Това така ли е наистина?
Kovoschiz (2022-05-07 09:31:44+00:00): `=college` means post-secondary college close to a university, not a secondary school.
mariotomo (2022-05-09 21:30:11+00:00): para marcar un "centro de salud", debes indicar la función, no limitarte al destino (previsto) del edificio.  no sé cuál es el caso en este particular, quizás realmente el centro fue construido como hospital y no está funcionando ni como atención médica básica, pues eso es lo que acabas de indicar.  pregunta en la comunidad para mejorarlo, o revisa el wiki, gracias por tus contribuciones.
mariotomo (2022-05-09 21:23:57+00:00): hola veo que utilizaste Bing.  yo por lo general me apoyo a Maxar y aquí en este área diría que Maxar es más nueva (revisa con el desarrollo de los árboles).
para el mapeo "remoto" es usual declarar "building=yes" y dejar la clasificación a la gente del lugar, si se trata de casa, o tienda, jardín, o quizás techo de cancha de deporte.  no sé cuál sería el caso, sólo te invito a reconsiderarlo.
gscscnd (2022-05-07 07:27:06+00:00): Opis użytych źródeł dodawaj do zestawu zmian, nie do poszczególnych obiektów.
mariotomo (2022-05-09 21:13:30+00:00): hola, bienvenido de vuelta a OSM. está muy bien que pongas el "review_requested".  antes de mirar el contenido, te sugiero leer y considerar las líneas guía para buenos comentarios a los conjuntos de cambios: "no aparece en mapa" no describé qué es lo que mejoraste, sólo que fue necesario añadir algo. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments

sigues conectado con ESRI?