piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
madnikhi (2021-09-10 11:03:16+00:00): Hello PT-53, 
Thanks for getting back to me. I have not added access=private as the driveways leads to other unknown entities. However, I have changed the access tag as per your suggestion. About the gate, I could see a barrier in Bing aerial imagery. Please let me know if there are any further changes to be made. 
Best Regards,
madnikhi
PT-53 (2021-09-10 11:15:13+00:00): 
Das ist vielleicht eine Wasserrinne im Boden, aber keine Schranke !
Grüße
madnikhi (2021-09-10 12:06:37+00:00): Hi PT-53, 
Thanks for checking into my edits. I have made the suggested changes as a part of changeset(111021108). Happy to learn from you. 
Regards,
madnikhi
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-10 21:32:03+00:00): What's the deal with not adding bridge cartpaths over the water?
pio2_122 (2021-09-15 11:12:01+00:00): Kontynuujesz dodawanie nieistniejących i niemożliwych do weryfikacji obiektów (np.: teoretycznie powstający budynek: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980925593, a w rzeczywistości: https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/Imgp … ID=5951946 - boisko na prywatnej posesji).

Zgodnie z zapowiedzią - zmiany wycofane w całości.
Frans S (2021-09-11 15:09:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You mapped here a few vaque traces as buildings.
A building is above the ground level which is visible by the shadow it gives. Do not include the shadow in the mapping
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards
abakus_uploader (2021-09-08 22:31:45+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
OddlyAngled (2021-09-08 14:10:42+00:00): I believe the wikipedia tag should be `en:Half Dome` with the en: prefix, any chance you can review and adjust as needed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110918293
tbo47 (2021-09-08 15:43:40+00:00): done!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110927571
OddlyAngled (2021-09-08 15:47:53+00:00): awesome, thanks!
VELOMANIA (2024-04-03 03:54:51+00:00): now VELOMANIA
RemiBovard (2024-04-03 10:07:32+00:00): Updated with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149516243
Frans S (2021-09-11 09:57:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Frans S (2021-09-11 15:27:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards
Futur3r (2021-09-08 14:06:54+00:00): Bonjour,

le tag hashtags=* n'existe pas et quel est la source msf ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110919096
Futur3r (2021-09-08 14:10:48+00:00): Et vous avez mal utilisez les tags access=*, les 'path' sont par défaut accessible qu'au piéton, vélo, chevaux, ... 

Le tag ford=* doit être utilisé uniquement s'il y a un passage à qué.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110919096
Futur3r (2021-09-08 14:11:17+00:00): Et sur le noeud d'intersection entre le chemin et le ruisseau.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110919096
Frans S (2021-09-11 14:04:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A request. Please map more accurate. 
Your mappings are rather oversized,
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 00:23:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917862520/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
Welshie (2024-03-21 11:35:51+00:00): It's a temporary construction compound that was itself under construction.
After the compound is constructed, it will be used to assist in the construction of nearby rail infrastructure.
After the construction phase of the rail infrastructure is completed, the land used by the construction compound will be returned to its previous use. If you can think of better tagging that is already used in Openstreetmap, please let me know.
Frans S (2021-09-13 09:33:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
a remark. Please don't connect nodes of a bui;ding to other features like roads.
see this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
Best regards
Polarbear (2021-09-09 09:24:47+00:00): Hi winkeldings, 
du hast als Quelle nur ein Luftbild angegeben, da wird man kaum erkennen können inwieweit der Pfad noch existiert. Hast du das vor Ort geprüft?
Wenn du ihn auf 'disused' setzt, verschwindet er aus den meisten Renderings und dient nicht mehr der Orientierung. Das Nutzungsverbot wird dann nicht mehr dargestellt.
wkdgs (2021-09-09 11:22:14+00:00): Hi,

ich glaube ich habe hier vergessen die Quelle anzugeben.

Meine Änderungen basieren auf der schon vorhandenen Notiz und diesem Hinweis: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2642407

Das Ziel war es den Weg auf der Karte nicht mehr anzuzeigen. Normalerweise würde ich einen solchen Weg nicht löschen, aber der Hinweis und die Notiz zeigen, dass es hier um einen Sonderfall geht. Zum einen sollte dieser Weg überhaupt nicht existieren und verläuft durch schützenswerte Natur. Ist angeblich sogar gefährlich. Zum anderen bringt das Entfernen von der Karte aus meiner Sicht mehr praktischen Nutzen als nur Zugangsbeschränkungen zu vergeben. 

Die Zugangsbeschränkungen werden auf vielen Karten nicht (oder nicht intuitiv genug) angezeigt. Auf OSM können die Wege z.B. mit legal benutzbaren Trampelpfaden verwechselt werden. Da viele sich auch frei nach der Karte orientieren, hilft es oft auch nicht viel, wenn das Routing diese Wege ignoriert.

Das "disused" habe ich gesetzt, damit andere Mapper den Weg nicht erneut einzeichnen.




Zum einen ist dies laut Hinweis und Notiz ein Weg, der nicht existieren sollte und durch schützenswerte Natur verläuft. Zum anderen, da die Zugangsbeschränkungen auf vielen Karten nicht zu erkennen sind und sich viele Wanderer auch ohne Routing nach passenden Wegen suchen.

LG
winkeldings
wkdgs (2021-09-09 11:24:17+00:00): Da hab ich wohl aus Versehen doppelt geschrieben :|.

Mir ist noch aufgefallen, dass weiter westlich ein ähnlicher Weg eingezeichnet ist. Falls der Weg hier auf disused gestellt wird, sollten wir das auch mit dem anderen Weg tun.
Polarbear-repair (2021-09-09 23:24:46+00:00): Die Kennzeichnung von Wegen wurde von Anwohnern mit der DWG diskutiert, DWG-Ticket#2021041610000119. 
Die OSMF, vertreten durch die DWG, vertritt die grundsätzliche Auffassung, dass ein noch existierender, aber gesperrter Weg mit diesen Attributen eingezeichnet wird. Auch gesperrte Wege dienen der Orientierung und ggf. in Notsituationen.
Im Gegensatz zu deiner Auffassung tritt eine Verwechslung eines legalen und eines illegalen Weges insbesondere dann auf, wenn der illegale Weg nicht in der Karte erkennbar ist. 
Stell dir z.B. vor, du entnimmst der Karte "dritten Weg links einbiegen", und der dritte Weg ist aber der illegale, eigentlich hättest du in den vierten gemusst. 
Ich habe den Zustand wiederhergestellt.
Polarbear-repair (2021-09-09 23:26:21+00:00): Die OSM-Daten sollen die Realität korrekt widerspiegeln. Wie gut diese dann in Renderern und Routern umgesetzt wird, obliegt deren Interpretation und ist dort zu verbessern.
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-10 14:42:08+00:00): Hi MenareRoyal, welcome to OSM.

Does it work?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Frans S (2021-09-13 09:50:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate mapping. Oversized buildings.
Square all rectangular buildings
Do not connect nodes of buildings to other features.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110919808
Frans S (2021-09-11 15:05:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Important. Use the correct Imagery to map from. Mapbox on this project. See the instructions
Bing is outdated and should only be used as reference when Mapbox is not clear enough.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-09-11 15:01:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please be more accurate in your mappings and square each rectangular building.
The shadow of a building shows where a wall ends. Take that as a mapping line.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards
marco2000 (2021-09-08 15:16:52+00:00): Nei locali della ex Biblioteca si è trasferita la sezione livornese dell' ARI (Associazione Radioamatori Italiani)
Per info segreteria@arilivorno.it
MarcoR (2021-09-12 13:21:50+00:00): Ciao! Ho modificato la mappatura della sezione da antenna (man_made=mast) a sede di un club/associazione (club=amateur_radio); se è presente un'antenna in un locale non privato (magari sul tetto) la puoi inserire come nodo a parte. Sai mica se la biblioteca (e i suoi libri) si è trasferita da qualche altra parte?
marco2000 (2021-09-12 15:13:49+00:00): Ciao.
Si, abbiamo un nostro "Parco antenne" montato sul tetto del locale (Multibanda HF, 2 VHF UHF, e un nodo APRS (vhf) funzionante 24 ore su 24.
Sinceramente non so dove  si sia trasferita la Biblioteca di igiene mentale ma cercherò di scoprirlo.

Marco   (segreteria@arilivorno.it)
Frans S (2021-09-11 15:21:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please use the project imagery Mapbox rather than Bing. Bing is outdated and does not reflect the current situation.
You mapped quite a number on non existing buildings. (demolished ?)
Be sure to use the correct Imagery.
Best regards
DaveHouto (2021-09-13 10:03:36+00:00): Apologies, we were told we could use both Mapbox and Bing when we had the training. Sorry if this has made your job harder. Thanks for the feedback
Frans S (2021-09-11 12:40:43+00:00): HEllo . Thanks for mapping. Your mappings are rather good and precise
Please do not include the shadow of a building into your mapping.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards
Frans S (2021-09-14 10:38:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the buildings and map more accurate ( your mappings are a bit oversized)

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110921250
mueschel (2021-09-12 18:12:38+00:00): It looks like many things went wrong here. The tags on the addr:interpolation lines don't match the house numbers, and some street names and house numbers have been mixed up in the tags.
Frans S (2021-09-14 10:30:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
When an object shows no shadowline next to it it is probably not a building ( not above groundlevel)

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110921337
osmviborg (2021-09-08 14:15:29+00:00): Jeg har tilbageført rettesættet. Der er fuld gang i et større vejprojekt i området, som man ikke nemt ser på 2020 ortofoto; men som er meget markant på 2021 ortofoto.
Ernst Poulsen (2021-09-08 14:36:58+00:00): Fint. Kan jeg hente 2021 ortofoto ind - og hvordan gør jeg?
osmviborg (2021-09-08 14:51:06+00:00): Du bruger ID, så det kan jeg ikke hjælpe med. Men du kan kigge med her: https://listservices.kortforsyningen.dk/#/map/WMS/orto_foraar_temp
osmviborg (2021-09-08 14:53:21+00:00): Jeg forstår ikke hvordan du kunne ignorerer den 'highway=construction' der gennemskæret området.
Ernst Poulsen (2021-09-08 15:55:52+00:00): Tak for linket til kortforsyningen. Den side kendte jeg ikke.
Frans S (2021-09-14 12:46:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please be more accurate and square the buildings you map.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110922078
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-04 06:45:44+00:00): Hello!

You used
mtb:scale=-0
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/878887005/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale=0-
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
SafetyIng (2021-09-09 06:46:22+00:00): Hey, ich hätte die Empfehlung, die Luftbilder des LVermGeo zu verwenden (in ID unter Kartenauswahl zu finden), da diese idR aktueller und positionsgetreuer sind ;)
Oisín (2021-09-09 07:31:41+00:00): Okay, danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte damit angefangen, fand die punktuell aber etwas schwammig/unscharf. Ich werde es also noch mal damit probieren. Danke.
Frans S (2021-09-14 10:13:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please do not collect multiple buildings and map it as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped individually

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110922552
Frans S (2021-09-13 14:47:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate and square mapping (your mappings are sometimes oversized.) 
Do not connect buildings to other buildings or features.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110922570
Scout Jens (2022-05-01 18:20:55+00:00): Die (Not-) Auffahrten zur Autobahn haben Namen? Woher hast Du das? Ansonsten werden Eigenschaften nicht im Namen dargestellt. Viele Grüße, Jens
Frans S (2021-09-11 12:28:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
vulasala (2021-09-09 03:42:39+00:00): Hi szende_nagy,
Trust you are doing well. I have aligned way 980574035 based on the ground truth.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110922973
szende_nagy (2021-09-09 13:19:31+00:00): Hello,
Thank you very much.
I appreciate it.
Frans S (2021-09-11 09:24:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the mapbox imagery to map from. The Bing imagery( sometimes automaticly loaded) is to old. (2006 -2017)
So you missed the newer buildings
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards
DressyPear4 (2021-09-09 11:01:23+00:00): Olá, se o tráfego da via flui em ambos os sentidos considere colocar duas faixas, mesmo que a via for estreita.
Adicione um comentário nas suas edições
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2021-09-11 09:26:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards
mapper377 (2021-09-08 15:19:40+00:00): More specifically, I removed way 58,358,764 and replaced it with way 34,370,833. No editing of ways was required due to thoughtful mapping by previous mappers. Thanks.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 19:10:12+00:00): Cześć.
Na pewno wodę z tej fontanny można pić? Nie ma dodatków chemicznych?
gscholz (2021-09-18 05:58:01+00:00): Hi Raphaelkaart,
your recent edits have created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected roads (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-39.33566&lat=-8.02292&zoom=9&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you may know, these roads cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?

As this seems to be a systematical error, can you please re-think your editing process how to avoid this error?
Kind Regards
Guido
Raphaelkaart (2021-09-19 21:16:00+00:00): Hello,
Good Morning!

I fixed the Roads that were wrongly mapped by min to paths and made the connection of some roads that were not connected.

Yours sincerely,

Raphaelkaart
user_5359 (2021-12-27 15:14:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980964401. What is the meaning of the tag floating=c ?
adrianojbr (2021-12-29 22:44:43+00:00): Hi! footway=crossing. I should be drunk... I fixed it. Thanks!
Frans S (2021-09-11 09:55:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-09-10 17:55:47+00:00): Hello, I am validating tasks of this project and welcome you as a new mapper. Please read this welcome letter and support issues.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/TM_Welcome_Letter
As a validator we check if all mappings has been done according the instructions and are free of errors
Especially we pay attention to work by new mappers to help them to avoid errors and give guidance/
Please pay more attention on squaring of buildings and not map clusters of buildings as 1 building
Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards
BCNorwich (2021-09-09 15:58:46+00:00): Hi, These two ways don't really make much sense. Could you say what you're trying to map? Maybe I can help?

Regards Bernard.
PBRipley (2021-09-09 18:49:48+00:00): Hi Bernard, im not sure what happened there. I have deleted the mistake.
Frans S (2021-09-11 10:07:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards and keep mapping.
freeExec (2021-09-08 17:08:15+00:00): А что за валидатор такой?
BusteR2712 (2021-09-09 05:20:44+00:00): валидатор от CupIvan, дописал свой валидатор, который берет данные из Дом.МинЖКХ и dadata
freeExec (2021-09-09 07:06:36+00:00): И у вас есть разрешения на внесение данных этих проектов в ОСМ?
Frans S (2021-09-11 09:19:48+00:00): Hello Lesley. Thanks for mapping on this task.
The instructions tells to use the Mapbox Imagery. You mapped from Bing as well. Bing is much  older. (2007- 2-17) 
Please square the buildings as well and be more accurate, (oversised)
Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
user_1566574 (2021-09-11 09:56:09+00:00): (J'abuse mais ça me surprend) elle n'est plus à sens unique la Rue de l'Helvétie ? Je l'air toujours connu comme ça... :')
2p2m (2021-09-12 07:25:53+00:00): Bonjour Antonin,
OK pour tes remarques, je vais modifier les commerces que j'ai mis à jour rapidement.
Pour la rue de l'Helvétie, elle est effectivement en double sens de la piscine jusqu'à la rue Ernest Nicolas, et ce depuis que c'est le seul accès à la piscine et au LEP. Le bout qui débouche sur la rue du stade est "temporairement" bloqué depuis des années !
Merci pour ton aide.
Patrick
Info : j'ai participé jeudi soir à la validation des futurs tracés de liaisons douces de Baume, ça va bouger dans les années futures !!
user_1566574 (2021-09-12 19:49:56+00:00): Salut Patrick,
– Top ! 
– D'accord pour la rue, merci. Si besoin, pour éviter aux logiciels de routage de l'utiliser, tu peux découper la portion inaccessible et indiquer access=no (ou motor_vehicle=no, si piétons/vélos peuvent passer)
Merci à toi ! :)

Ah extra ! Très très bonne chose ! J'en profite pour glisser des services comme geovelo.fr et cyclosm.org.
Merci du partage, ça fait plaisir, d'ailleurs je vais faire profiter Lejun de la bonne nouvelle ! ;)