piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chillly (2017-03-21 14:48:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM

I wonder if you were experimenting with the editor and save your experiment. You have changed a pet shop into an interior design shop, that's fine if you meant that, but you added another interior design shop at the same place and somehow joined them in a boundary relation which outlines cities and counties usually. 

Do you need a hand tidying this up?
dialogueuk (2017-03-21 15:00:19+00:00): Yes please...
Perfect Pets has moved out, and Redvers Interiors moved in.  There shroud not be a second shop or a boundary relation!

Any help appreciated.
chillly (2017-03-21 15:09:09+00:00): OK, I have tidied up the extra shop and relation. It may take a few minutes to appear and you may need to refresh the cache in your browser to see the change.
dialogueuk (2017-03-21 15:22:06+00:00): Thanks, much appreciated.

Regards,  Dave/.
harg (2020-10-09 10:06:54+00:00): Hi

A member has commented on this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2379381#map=19/51.47419/-0.29190

It seems strange that a bus stop should be on a footpath and TFL's bus stops API is showing only the other two stops in Kew Road, so perhaps this is an error? Would you like to follow this up?
tyr_asd (2017-05-04 16:20:29+00:00): Hallo Daniel. Stimmt das wirklich? Bin gerade daran vorbeigefahren und für mich sah die Straße in der Realität nicht gerade "gerade" aus.
Владимир К (2017-03-22 06:40:20+00:00): что это? и что значит соответствует яндексу? у нас тут нельзя его использовать. ну кроме его панорам улиц.
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
Spanholz (2017-03-21 14:56:02+00:00): I hope you put a lot of effort in it. It is a pleasure to delete this stuff in 10s.

Please only add existing things to OSM. This is no playground.
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
Constable (2017-03-21 17:57:28+00:00): ciao, guarda che hai rimosso tutta l'area che era mappata come landuse=residential, te ne sei accorto vero?
qua puoi vedere a cosa mi riferisco
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=47042444
Attendo una tua risposta, poi provvedo io a ripristinarla.
Grazie, ciao
Constable (2017-03-22 11:20:57+00:00): Inoltre, perché hai aggiunto il tag amenity=pharmacy a questo edificio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277308138 ? la farmacia è già mappata a fianco, con questo nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2245453922
Sarebbe stato sufficiente spostare il nodo sopra l'edificio che la contiene; adesso invece guardando la mappa risultano due farmacie.
Provvedo a ripristinare l'area residenziale in attesa di una tua risposta.
Grazie
mavl (2017-10-08 10:17:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
bhousel (2017-03-21 15:00:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
Владимир К (2017-03-22 14:41:24+00:00): посмотрите на соседний дам, там правильно обозначено "строение"
Alexander-II (2017-03-24 06:10:47+00:00): Дом, который только строется, но еще не построен, принято тэгировать building=construction, а не building=yes. Будете исправлять адрес, не забудьте и этот тэг поправить
Herr Kramer (2019-02-06 08:51:03+00:00): Hallo Dan_Hart,

sind es wirklich Gebäude'NAMEN' "Gebäude XY" oder sind es doch nur Gebäude'NUMMERN'? -> ansonsten bitte nicht als "name" taggen, da es ja kein Name ist.

Bei Gebäudenummern bitte unter "ref" und/oder "loc_ref" eintragen. (Als Beispiel schaue dir gerne den Uni-Campus an)

Weiteres siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
Dan_Hart (2019-02-06 08:56:20+00:00): Hallo Herr Kramer,

es handelt sich tatsächlich um Namen "Gebäude XY", die Nummern werden nicht alleinstehend verwendet.

Beste Grüße
Dan_Hart
plamen (2017-03-29 07:26:13+00:00): Relation:street is still not approved.
Deleting highway=* is causing problems here.
Changeset will be reverted.
Rainero (2017-03-21 21:46:35+00:00): Hallo Skorfulose,

sehr gut, daß du dich um die Aktualisierung der Straßen im Neubaugebiet kümmerst!
Haben die Häuser schon Hausnummern? Viellcht mast du damit ja weitermachen? :-)

Servus,
Rainer
Skorfulose (2017-03-22 14:08:20+00:00): Gerne, muss mich nur erstmal belesen wie das überhaupt geht. Bin neu hier ;-)
miche101 (2017-03-28 07:28:56+00:00): ahh da ist die Fläche verschunden ;-) Bitte Vorsichtig beim Löschen sein!
miche101 (2017-03-28 07:32:10+00:00): ...wenn du hilfe brauchst kannst dich melden.
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:28:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
Rainero (2017-03-21 21:40:12+00:00): Hallo Lillebro,

du wolltest an dem Gebäude am Eck des Josef-Katterloher-Rings Hausnummern eintragen?
Ich sehe, daß du eine Trennlinie im Doppelhaus eingezeichnet hast. Vermutlich konntest du es dann nicht in zwei Doppelhaushälften aufspalten, richtig?
Ich habe das mal an der von dir eingetragenen Trennlinie gemacht, kann dir aber nicht sagen, ob bzw. wie das mit dem iD-Editor im Browser geht.
Vielleicht kannst und magst du jetzt weitermachen und die Hausnummern eintragen?

Servus,
Rainer
Felipe Alves (2017-03-21 20:35:51+00:00): Oi, Angellow. O que quis mapear aqui,e xiste um campo de futebol neste local? Pergunto porque pela descrição do seu conjunto de alterações, poderia ser algo do jogo. O OpenStreetMap é um mapa real do mundo, portanto informações do Pokemon Go não devem entrar aqui. Se quiser qualquer ajuda, só avisar.
Abs
smaprs (2017-03-21 20:13:55+00:00): Olá Kelly, bem-vinda ao OSM. Apenas pequenas notas: sobre estes pontos, como "hospital": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4747150223; e este como "monumento": https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4747179125. O que eram para ser? Obrigado
ftrebien (2017-04-10 14:46:46+00:00): O monumento é uma escultura de uma das vacas da Cow Parade. Seria mais correto mapear como tourism=artwork do que como historic=monument (usado para monumentos oficiais). Não tem identificação no local, e não consta em nenhum dos mapas da Cow Parade, então vou assumir que "Sindicato" é o nome da obra de arte (cada artista deu um nome à sua vaca) e nomear como "Cow Parade Sindicato" no meu próximo changeset. Quanto ao resto do changeset dela, não investiguei. Acho que a mapeadora desistiu de contribuir para o projeto, está há 3 semanas sem fazer edições e sem responder a esta questão. Não conheço o aplicativo que ela usou para mapear (MapsWithMe), pode ser não esteja associando corretamente o significado dos seus elementos com os do OSM.
smaprs (2017-04-10 14:57:04+00:00): É, o maps.me tem estes problemas. Muitas tags sem sentido e usurários quase nunca respondem. Só vendo no local o que é cada coisa.
abDoug (2017-03-24 02:59:28+00:00): The quadrant suffixes used in Calgary are NW, NE, SW & SE, not "Northwest" etc. If you are going to edit in a city you know nothing about, take the time to learn what the standard has long been here
arming_telenav (2017-03-24 07:58:39+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I used the suffix Northwest because this is how the road name in mapped in Canvec, but I will keep in mind that NW, NE, SW & SE is the standard in Calgary.
eggie (2017-03-21 17:00:32+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-21 17:03:51+00:00): Tip: Het heeft de voorkeur in OSM de info van het bedrijf op de adresnode te zetten.

Hint: It's maybe better to put the info at the addressnode.
Constable (2017-03-22 12:12:20+00:00): Ciao, ti scrivo in merito a questo tratto di strada da te aggiungo (correttamente) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481824491
Il tag access=yes è già sottinteso dal tag highway=*, puoi anche ometterlo. Se invece non è consentito l'accesso a bici/cavalli/auto,... puoi usare i relativi tag (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation) per indicarlo, in mancanza dei quali, la strada è considerata come accessibile a tutti.
Grazie per la collaborazione
streckenkundler (2017-03-25 08:24:54+00:00): Hier hattest du viele Daten gelöscht, u.a. Öffnungszeiten. Datensatz revertet.
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
DD1GJ (2017-03-21 20:22:25+00:00): Hallo LeToxicoman, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für die neue Straße. Aber der "Park" war sehr suspekt und wurde daher gelöscht. http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
LeToxicoman (2017-03-21 20:34:41+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ,
Die Streuobstwiese kannst Du im B-Plan "Hinter dem Dorfe" der Gemeinde Wedemark nachvollziehen. Daher fände ich es gut, wenn die da wieder hinkommen würde. Das Polygon (gelb) des Wohngebietes müsste auch nach Nordosten vergrößert werden. Ich weiß aber nicht, eie das geht...   vG LeTox
DD1GJ (2017-03-21 22:12:21+00:00): Hallo LeTox, ich habe das Baugebiet anhand des (veralteten) Luftbildes durch verschieben und Einfügen von Knoten etwas erweitert. Am Besten geht das mit JOSM, siehe Tutorial.

Auf den Seiten von Wedemark habe ich zwar die öffentliche Bekanntmachung gefunden, aber keine Bebauungspläne. Bei OSM halten wir uns da an die Realität. Sind die Bäume schon gepflanzt oder ist dies nur geplant. 

Weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dorchard

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
LeToxicoman (2017-03-22 12:54:48+00:00): Hallo Joachim,
hier der Link zum B-Plan: 
https://www.wedemark.de/regional/bauleitplanung/bebauungsplan-nr-15-07-1-hinterm-dorfe-1-aenderung-918000155-20051.html?plantyp=b&titel=Bebauungsplan+Nr.+15%2F07-1.+-+Hinterm+Dorfe+-+1.+%C3%84nderung

Hier findest Du den offiziellen Bauleitplan:
https://navigator.wedemark.de/bauleitplan-918000155-20051.html

Die Bäume der Streuobstwiese sind bereits gepflanzt worden.

Weißt Du, warum die neue Straße in der Standard-Ansicht erst erscheint, wenn man herauszoomt?

Viele Grüße

Carsten
whb (2017-03-22 14:50:20+00:00): Es dauert immer etwas, bis alle Zoomstufen aktualisiert wurden.
Im Zweifel den Browser-Cache leeren.
joost schouppe (2017-03-23 09:49:14+00:00): Dit lijkt op basis van luchtofot en GRB duidelijk geen park, maar private tuinen. Maak wat foto's met Mapillary indien dit wel het geval is. Je lijkt iets te enthousiast met het aanduiden van parken.
ChrissW-R1 (2017-03-22 14:17:43+00:00): Please have a look at this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/936498

The tag shoal=coral_reef is inconsistent.
edvac (2018-08-18 11:12:25+00:00): Done
joost schouppe (2017-03-23 09:47:25+00:00): De Leieboorden zijn nog in aanbouw, en het lijkt toch ook niet echt een park te gaan worden.
We hebben speciale aandacht voor parken omwille van manipulatie door PokemonGo adepten.
poornibadrinath (2017-03-21 21:47:46+00:00): Hi Cbhamlin,
  I came across your edits and noticed you have added a stream which doesn't connect to any other water  body. But since there is a depression that is seen in the imagery, I would assume this is seasonal. Can you please explain why have you added this stream and does it connect to any other stream or an other water body down the lane. If yes, can you please trace it accordingly? 
Thank you,

Best,
Poorni Badrinath
cbhamlin (2017-03-24 03:13:09+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for taking a look.  I went to take a walk along this today  It meanders, and changes size, so doesn't look manmade, but I think after looking at the it, it is drainage.  It starts/ends on each end with concrete pipes, and does connect along the way as shown.

Does this sound like it should be a 'ditch' instead?  Should I trace it more exactly along that depression?

Thanks!
poornibadrinath (2017-03-24 14:02:26+00:00): Hi,
  I guess this does sound like a ditch or a drainage pipe. tagging it that way would be appropriate. It would also be great to trace it according to the imagery. Thanks for taking a look at it. 
Best,
Poornima
eggie (2017-03-21 20:13:34+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-21 20:19:23+00:00): Je hebt bij de Scouting een gebouw op een gebouw gezet. Is dat de bedoeling?
Bij het judogebouw heb je een adresnode verwijderd. Wat dat ook de bedoeling?
eggie (2017-03-21 20:46:40+00:00): De Judo en de Scouting heb ik aangepast. de info en website nu ook staat op de adresnode. De namen zijn van het gebouw af.
eggie (2017-03-21 20:47:42+00:00): landuse forest heb ik hier ook weggehaald. dat was bos op bos. Niet jouw fout overigens.
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
joost schouppe (2017-03-23 09:45:09+00:00): Hoi,
Een voedingwinkel is geen café :)
Kleine winkeltjes worden doorgaans als "convenience" aangeduid ("kruidenier"). Wellicht is de naam iets anders dan "Chinese voedingswinkel"? In het veld voor naam gebruiken we echt enkel de naam, niet een omschrijving. De "keuken" had je als "chinees" omschreven, maar we gebruiken enkel Engels in de datavelden. Ik heb het zo al aangepast. Moest je de "echte" naam nog te weten komen, vul maar aan.
Ik heb je punten ook iets beter gelegd. Op de luchtfoto kijk je scheef op het gebouw. Als je de punten goed legt op het dak, dan zweven die dus eigenlijk ergens in het niets. Je kan bij achtergrondlagen eens checken met "Belgium AGIV GRB Flanders" om een zeer gedetailleerde gebouwenkaart eronder te leggen.
brianboru (2017-05-16 16:26:57+00:00): We now have a big blank space for landuse as you've deleted the multipolygon and not replaced it. How far does the construction site extend?
chillly (2017-03-21 17:19:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM

You seem to have drawn a park over the top of a road. Are you sure there is a park there?
user_5359 (2017-03-26 07:48:59+00:00): Hallo, Du hast den Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481835888 ohne Schlüsselwerte eingezeichnet. Kannst Du bitte prüfen, ob Du da was vergessen hast, oder die Linie löschen?
Jose Riha (2017-06-07 22:06:49+00:00): ahoj,

mam otazku k https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2665732956 - to su naozaj 2 tatrabanky tak blizko seba? dik, j
Johnwhelan (2024-02-04 17:19:56+00:00): The landuse residential seems three times the area of the settlement.
chillly (2017-03-21 18:22:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM

Your parks seem a little odd. Parc Y Peggrem is clearly over the top of a house and garden.

Parc y Llew is over the top of a recreation ground, which looks a better choice of tag to me. It also has the English name in the Welsh name tag (name:cy is for Welsh). Parc y Ddraig is also over the top of an existing recreation ground. 

Should the real name:cy be Parc Y Pokémon? 

I will revert this edit
Polarbear (2019-11-20 19:08:21+00:00): Hallo anbr,
mir ist völlig unverständlich, warum du die korrekte Abbiege-Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5159668 von ihren Members in Fürstenwalde entleert hast, um sie in Berlin-Köpenick für ein Wendeverbot zu nutzen, das es gar nicht gibt. Beides in 2015er und 2018er mapillary-Bildern geprüft. 
Repariert in cs77341397. 
Wie dir der JOSM-Validator das aufgetragen hat, verstehe ich auch nicht, er ist ja auch keine Datenquelle.
Polarbear (2019-11-20 20:08:32+00:00): Ist auch nicht die einzige "verpflanzte" Relation, andere sind z.B. (Richtigkeit noch nicht überprüft):
r6895655 FW/Hegelstr -> B-Lichterfelde/Drakestr
r6895654 FW/Hegelstr -> B-Lichterfelde/Morgensternstr
r6895653 FW/Hegelstr -> B-Köpenich/Bellevuestr
r6895651 FW/service -> B/Königsberger Str
r5361057 FW/August-Bebel-Str ->B/Goerzallee
r5257160 Grünheide/Chausseestr -> B-Mariendorf/Britzer Str
r5257158 Grünheide/Thälmannstr -> B-Mariendorf/Britzer Str
r5257157 Grünheide/Chausseestr -> B-Marienfelde/Mohriner Allee
r5257156 Grünheide/Chausseestr -> B-Neukölln -> Britzer Damm
usw.
usw.: _sämtliche_ Abbiegerelationen sind von Fürstenwalde oder Grünheide nach Berlin "eingeflogen".
naoliv (2017-03-21 19:49:08+00:00): Fernanda, ao invés de apagar um objeto para depois mapeá-lo novamente, tente corrigir o que está errado.
Por exemplo, fazendo os ajustes do traçado ou arrumando algum nome incorreto.
mueschel (2017-03-22 11:38:15+00:00): Hi,
you used these tags:
  traffic_signals:ground = yes
  traffic_signals:light = yes
They are not in use in any other place yet - what is their meaning?
Jan
mweper (2017-03-22 12:05:19+00:00): Hi @mueschel.
This news talks about the tags (invented by now) that I put, since I did not know if there was a tag for that.
-
http://rosarionoticias.gob.ar/page/noticias/id/77308/title/Se-puso-en-funcionamiento-el-primer-semáforo-peatonal-de-piso-del-país
--
I put both for the doubts and as a reminder.
* traffic_signals:floor_light=yes Trying to follow the same example as traffic_signals:floor_vibration=yes
* traffic_signlas:ground=yes I asked in osm-ar (Telegram) and we invented a matching tag until I found the correct one.
-
If you know which label is correct, please tell me or replace what I put for that. Thank you.
mueschel (2017-03-22 12:22:39+00:00): Hi,
alright. I would go with the 'floor_light' version. Please add an entry to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals 
Recently, a similar installation was made in the Netherlands.
mweper (2017-03-26 20:06:58+00:00): Is it okay like this?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_add_a_floor_light_for_pedestrians.3F
RSergei (2017-03-22 16:07:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Касаемо Ваших наименований улиц. Прочитайте http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог   там рассказано как правильно писать статусную часть. Соответственно при Вашем наименовании неверно. Вас уже поправляли не раз
RSergei (2017-03-22 16:12:21+00:00): Да ещё момент, именованные улицы на дачах нужно повышать в статусе до highway=residential
BladeTC (2017-03-21 22:01:57+00:00): Fernanda, qual o motivo da exclusão das tags "boundary=administrative" e "type=boundary" das relações, como esta http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5268645/history ?
I-76 (2024-02-28 19:46:00+00:00): Just a notice if you ever read this, cell towers (and other things with feature types) should not be named what their feature type is, as that would be putting it in twice unnecessarily. I'm going to try to rectify mapping practices like this, but I'm not perfect. So contact me with any questions.
Thanks,
I-76
SimonPoole (2017-03-21 20:29:37+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47050375
SimonPoole (2017-03-21 20:32:26+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM, auch wenn die Änderung  vielleicht lustig gemeint war, sie war es nicht. Bitte mach bitte nur mit konstruktiven Beiträgen weiter.

Danke
micahcochran (2017-03-24 15:54:45+00:00): Hey.  In Roselawn Memorial Garden,  just wanted to point my out that some of "footways" look like, from the aerial photography, that they should be tagged as service roads.  I've never been to this cemetery.  The parking lot suggests that somebody can drive there to park even if it is just employees.  Thanks for all the edits. - Micah
Kpburns (2017-04-02 19:25:46+00:00): You are absolutely right.  There were already some foot paths there and I just continued on without checking it out for myself.  It's corrected now.  Thanks for pointing out my dumb mistakes. I want to have an accurate map so I do appreciate the corrections.
Alan (2017-03-21 21:29:00+00:00): Hello Wendy,
It looks like this changeset deleted 48 nodes in the area. I assume this was an accident? If so, we can revert your edit and bring back all those deleted venues.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-12 17:36:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4747481929/history - so this hotel is not existing and never existed, right?
pyram (2017-03-21 20:02:50+00:00): Hallo jonny65,
Schön, dass Du dich hier einbringen willst. Aber das "Nummern entfernen" ist einfach ein Fehler. Ich werde das jetzt wieder reparieren.
jonny65 (2017-03-21 21:05:42+00:00): Hallo pyram,
Bei "Auf openstreetmap.org ansehen" seh ich die "95" doppelt, vom Gebäude und vom Eingang, sorry.
pyram (2017-03-21 21:41:13+00:00): Nö, das zweite 95 kommt vom "office". Bei Objekten, die keine eigene Darstellung bekommen, gewinnt die dortige Adresse. Das ist ein Rendererproblem und kein Datenproblem.
=> Wir mappen nicht für den Renderer. Das heißt, wir ändern Daten nicht deshalb, damit es auf *einer* der vielen OSM-Karten ein bestimmtes Aussehen ergibt.

Danke trotzdem.

PS: Das Gebäude (vielleicht sind es auch zwei) hat im übrigen zwei Adressen und für das Routing bevorzuge ich und andere eine haustürgenaue Erfassung.
Alexander-II (2017-03-22 12:06:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. А зачем на рекламном щите тэг access=yes/no? Может быть он там не нужен?
Echo78 (2017-03-22 19:39:03+00:00): Из вики передирал, думаю, что есть ли доступ к постеру (закрыт ли стеклом или кожухом).
Alexander-II (2017-03-23 16:47:35+00:00): Увидел, спасибо за пояснения.
d1g (2017-03-21 20:37:04+00:00): вам даётся два дня на:

1. объяснение удалений

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355160255/history

2. объяснение ввода

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480064188

http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=47049341