piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cyclist789 (2026-07-24 06:23:12+00:00): node/1108110766 node/295082121 node/295083308

These three Nodes are only tagged with end_date=2015.

I'm not sure if they needs to remain on the map, but if they do, consider tagging them with removed:power=tower so people don't have to open their History pages to see what they are.

I checked using this query, so I don't think there are any more of them.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?template=key-value&key=end_date&value=2015
Alecs01 (2016-08-14 11:28:23+00:00): Is this the real name of a cafe?
SomeoneElse (2016-08-15 13:20:05+00:00): Hello,
Under what licence is the source that you have used here made available?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend
AdVerburg (2016-08-15 17:55:39+00:00): Good day to you,

For the fhe first source have a look at https://www.defensie.nl/english/copyright, where is written that the content of their website is under ‘Creative Commons Zero’ (CC0).
The second source is Rijkswaterstaat (the Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment): have a look at http://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/english/disclaimer/index.aspx the sentence “Reuse of all content is free and permitted.”
Yours sincerely Ad Verburg.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-15 17:56:24+00:00): Excellent!  Thanks.
mavl (2016-08-14 17:13:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы противоречите сами себе. Вы указали описание description=Сладости мира, но выбрали тип магазина shop=boutique, что означает магазин модной одежды [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dboutique]. Магазин сладостей - это кондитерская [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dconfectionery].  
  
Также вы указали level=2, желая указать, что этот магазин находится на втором этаже. Но для тега level нумерация ведётся от нуля и для второго этажа нужно указывать 1 [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:level].  
  
И ещё вы зачем-то включили этот магазин в отношение автобуса № 14. Зачем это было сделано?
FTA (2016-08-13 22:46:12+00:00): Hi,
Only real world things should be added to OpenStreetMap.
Happy Mapping,
Ethan (FTA)


Hallo,
Nur realen Welt Dinge sollten zu OpenStreetMap hinzugefügt werden.
Glückliche Mapping,
Ethan (FTA)
literan (2016-08-13 11:51:46+00:00): задваиваешь, по второму разу добавляешь. Откатываю.
Marc-sch (2016-08-17 18:13:06+00:00): Hoi,

Onlangs heb je het gebouw Grotius College VMBO aangepast. Helaas is hierbij de door mij geimporteerde bouwkundige tekening verloren gegaan. Hierdoor kloppen zowel de contouren als de locatie van het gebouw niet meer. Daarnaast betreft het niet het Grotius, maar SC Delfland. Graag enkel aanpassen indien de verandering een verbetering van de kaart betekent. Ik heb de oude DWG's weer geimporteerd.

MVG Marc S.
ff5722 (2016-08-17 19:29:55+00:00): Ik heb alleen de naam toegevoegd zoals je kunt zien
luiswoo (2016-08-14 14:04:40+00:00): Не нужно использовать highway=road, для этого есть http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
По highway=road не будет вести от слова совсем.
luiswoo (2016-08-14 14:07:12+00:00): Можно не заморачиваться с оформлением грунтовки, и если там может проехать машина, то просто добавить тег motorcar=yes
luiswoo (2016-08-13 15:38:31+00:00): это не совсем детский сад http://www.eureka-rostov.ru/
muralito (2016-08-14 14:05:05+00:00): Cesar:

Por la forma de contarlo, Malecon II tiene 18 niveles, salvo que le hayan demolido el ultimo.
El piso 0 es level 1, el piso 17 es level 18.

Obviamente que siempre es mas exacto agregar tambien la altura si la conoces.



Romaquiel que lo pusiste como tourism=chalet eso es para alojamiento turistico mas bien permanente, cualquiera podria ir y alquilarla.
Para marcar una casa (sin la parte turistica) basta con building=house.
Fijate cual corresponde usar segun sea el caso.
Supaplex (2016-08-13 16:18:38+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
will_p (2016-08-13 14:48:17+00:00): First, I regret you feel objections to your admin boundary changes are a personal attack. I have no wish to attack you personally. You do seem to be aware that the changes you are making are controversial. Therefore you really should have tried to find consensus before going ahead. If you don't seek consensus then other mappers are entitled to raise concerns. That should obviously be done in a polite manner.

Three mappers, including myself, have now stated they think administrative boundary mapping should be limited to official boundaries and not to indicate the absence of such a boundary. I really do think you should discuss this on the talk-gb mailing list before proceeding further. If you do carry on, it's not unreasonable for others to continue raising objections.

You use the old argument of mappers having their own territory and disliking others making changes. I actually think the Nottingham community is very welcoming to new mappers and people are largely left to get on with things. You have been mapping for a few months now, often interacting with my and other local mappers work and nobody has tried to stop you. Of course, if you make changes in areas I'm most familiar with, then I'm more likely to notice problems, and raise concerns. To me that's normal. OSM is a collaborative project, so it's actually a good thing for a mapper to monitor local changes and raise legitimate concerns. There is, of course, a balance to be struck between tolerating differences of opinion over tagging and different mapping interests while still challenging mapping when it's genuinely problematic.

To answer your specific points, the Nottinghamshire County Council map you cite makes no claim to be an official representation of civil parish boundaries. OS Boundary-Line is a far more reliable source and the questionable civil parishes you are adding are not present in that data set (or at least not present as civil parishes).

I really don't understand your point about contacting Broxtowe Borough Council. I have no disagreement whatsoever with the official boundaries. BBC are not claiming there is a civil parish called 'Beeston and Stapleford' or 'Beeston' - as far as I can tell only you are claiming that. I've lived variously in Beeston and Stapleford for a good part of my life, so have good knowledge where the boundary lies. Here we a talking about the official civil parish boundary, which is very clearly defined. People locally do consider areas outside that boundary to be part of Stapleford, but I don't see the relevance, because your changes only concern official administrative boundaries.

Of course, some sources will list names like 'Beeston (unparished)'. But that's just a label to differentiate it from parished areas, it's not an indication that an actual legally recognised administrative entity exists.

Finally, your comments might lead others to believe you have just added the civil parishes in Broxtowe, when in fact they have all been present in OSM for more than five years.
will_p (2016-08-13 14:50:34+00:00): I actually meant to add this to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41419922
will_p (2016-08-13 14:59:22+00:00): In response to your changeset comment here, it's really not unreasonable to suggest deleting something which doesn't exist and it's unhelpful to describe it as a 'threat'. Why not try to be more constructive and recognise the legitimate concerns that others have over this?
will_p (2016-08-13 18:12:51+00:00): I find the tone of your reply unnecessarily personal. I want to be clear, I find it unpleasant and would like it to stop. I intend to stick firmly to the matter in hand in this reply. 

1. Administrative boundaries define legally defined entities. There's little grey area here - something is either a civil parish or it isn't. The unparished areas are just voids between these legally defined entities.

2. I don't believe objects tagged in OSM should claim to be one thing, but then have an obscure secondary tag claiming to be something else. Here you are tagging something as a civil parish, but the designation tag then says hay-ho no it's not! How can you expect data users to know about your obscure designation tag? It isn't only me who objects to this, it's been discussed several times on the mailing lists over recent years. It's similar to now discredited tagging such as railway=station with end_date=1967 or shop=supermarket with proposed=yes. It's pretending to be something it isn't.

If I query a database loaded with OSM data to discover which admin areas a node lies within, I would expect it to return the legally defined administrative areas and not placeholders for areas which might exist in the future but currently don't. I expect most other data users would expect the same.

I wouldn't be wasting my time writing this if I didn't genuinely consider your tagging to be problematic. If you want to redefine the meaning of admin boundaries in OSM, then you need to discuss it with the community first and reach a consensus. Again, I request you discuss this with the community before continuing to add these areas.
alexkemp (2016-08-13 19:21:17+00:00): I'm going to be discussing this with the relevant local, city and/or county authorities in order to get the situation clear before I do or say anything else (unless I find my work summarily deleted, of course).
will_p (2016-08-13 21:37:39+00:00): I'm sorry you are unset by my suggestion to delete your relation. It was made in the genuine belief that what you added doesn't exist. It's become apparent that you strongly contest that point. My feeling now is that this is something that requires wider community discussion rather than action on my own account.

But aren't you overreacting here? I wasn't suggesting deleting hours of work. The relation in question has 13 constituent ways and two nodes which wouldn't be deleted. It's something that could be recreated in a few minutes (and probably in even less time by reverting or undeleting). You have clearly spent hours tidying the constituent ways and that's a valuable contribution, but they wouldn't be affected by anything I have suggested.
alexkemp (2016-08-13 21:58:58+00:00): Hi Will.
 
A month ago I added https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/alexkemp/diary/39062 (Nottinghamshire Civil Parishes - names for unnamed areas) then a couple of days ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/alexkemp/diary/39247 (Derbyshire Civil Parishes - names for unnamed areas).

I put the July Diary entry up so that folks had a chance to comment on it. Nobody said nothing.

The issue for me here is that you have not addressed my reasoning. Not one scrap of it. You dismiss the relevance of these Unparished Area, but with zero reasoning. Your decision & word is sufficient.

I have spent days & weeks researching, deciding & communicating those results to all who would pay attention. Zero response. Then you accuse me of over-reacting.

It is worthless trying to reason with a man that ignores all you say in favour of his own emotional reactions. Diamonds to a pig.

I shall wait until Monday and my chance to obtain the council's view. Then reassess my position once I have sufficient information.
will_p (2016-08-13 22:35:03+00:00): "Diamonds to a pig." - It's a shame you feel you have to keep insulting me personally. It's hardly conducive to discussing the points you've raised. Yes, I've critisied your tagging choices, but never you personally. Your behaviour is uncalled for.
alexkemp (2016-08-13 22:44:04+00:00): Hi Will
 
Once again: criticise my reasons & we can have a useful discussion. Criticise my actions, or myself personally, and we can never have a useful discussion. On this matter, and your statements, look in the mirror.
 
I said: you punch me, I punch you back, often & hard. Remember, you started this. That will continue until I receive an apology for your previous behaviour + an obvious change of tack.
 
Examine my reasons. If you find those reasons flawed then explain why. Do that & we can get on. Keep making threats & personal comments & we shall just be back to handbags at dawn.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-14 20:21:57+00:00): @alexkemp , Please tone the comments down a bit.  Saying things like "Diamonds to a pig", "you punch me, I punch you back, often & hard" and "I trust my personal experience better than someone else's intellectual considerations" don't help to communicate your message; in fact they have the opposite effect.
Consensus is valued in OSM - if you've got three people saying "you're doing it wrong" it's usually an indication that at the very least you might want to step back and reconsider, or perhaps try and engage a wider community (perhaps via the talk-gb list).
Cheers,
Andy (wearing a DWG hat)
alexkemp (2016-08-14 23:43:40+00:00): Hi Andy
 
Yes, you are correct. I apologise to Will, hoping that he reads this.
 
50 years ago I read in a book that, in the 1800s, the staff at Lunatic Asylums would lock all their inmates into their cells at every Full Moon. A little later I was hitch-hiking and got a lift from someone that turned out to be a nurse in a Lunatic Asylum (or whatever they were called at the time) (with hindsight just now, it's entirely possible that that person worked at Rampton, a high-security installation for the criminally insane; I worked for them myself providing network support ~15 years ago). Eagerly, I asked him if he could confirm this snippet of information from the previous century. He laughed, and said “never mind 100 years ago; it's what we do today”.
 
Tonight in Nottingham the skies were clear for the first time in days. I looked up at the moon in surprise, and slapped my forehead. Checking the 'net, the next full moon is in 3 days time, at 5:27 a.m., but the more important one to watch out for is the Harvest Month next month (3:05 p.m. 16 September) (the power of moons themselves act in power cycles; there are two peaks: one at Easter (predominantly physical) and one in Autumn (affects friends & family).
 
I've been watching Moons for the last 50 years, diligently. Each & every full moon causes emotional disturbance in the human race. Folks find it more difficult to sleep, to behave or cogitate rationally, and the race as a whole becomes more prone to emotional / violent outbursts.
 
I received yet another provocative comment today: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41449409 (deeply cynical, that one). For the next 3 months I am going to respond to *all* comments with an auto-response (see next comment). Anyone in future that deletes any of my work will have it undeleted & themselves immediately reported for abuse with a recommendation for removal of mapping privileges.
 
Thanks for reading.
alexkemp (2016-08-14 23:44:56+00:00): This is an automated response: sorry, but I'm too busy mapping too be able to spare the time to respond to you. Thank you for your interest in my mapping. -Alex Kemp
Glassman (2016-08-13 14:47:07+00:00): The Sky View Observatory is already tagged.
kapazao (2020-05-06 12:11:39+00:00): Hello, is this a waterfall from the nearest node tagged as waterway=weir?
user_870861 (2016-08-22 18:49:39+00:00): hi,
there is 
- duplicated  (exactly same geometry and exactly same tags between 2 ways) building (way or relation)
- duplicated  (exactly same geometry and exactly same tags between 2 nodes) trees,shop etc...

between this 2 changeset :

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41429473
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41431825
richlv (2016-08-14 11:38:28+00:00): hey, this changeset added the same housenumber to two buildings - is that really correct ?
gileri (2016-09-04 17:30:00+00:00): Hello,

There is no need to repeat "chiringuito" in the name, as this is already indicated with the tag amenity=bar or aminity=pub.

Also, please use uppercase characters for the name.

So the name should be "El Loro" for this bar.
marc__marc (2023-07-30 00:52:14+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4346637601
que veux-dire hinge=horizontal ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Tchiller (2016-10-06 09:02:27+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437030214#map=19/-52.35464/-59.75072 seems to be in wrong place. Shold be on coastline.
Alecs01 (2016-08-14 12:16:55+00:00): Please do not add foreing names under the name=* tag, use name:xx, if relevant (this is not the case I believe)
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-12 13:07:01+00:00): Hi kartler175, landuse=farmland und natural=scrub an https://osm.org/relation/5540154 ergibt keinen Sinn – das kann nicht gleichzeitig Gebüschfläche und Ackerland sein.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-12-10 03:29:05+00:00): Hi, aighes. I have adjusted the tertiary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/437042761) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
rab (2016-08-13 16:41:10+00:00): welcome to OSM
Mupani Avenue, is this the road in front of the school? I named it so based on the address information you provided. Please check for correctness.
Is Rainbow a private operator?
mavl (2016-08-14 08:08:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Слово «Магазин» в названии магазина указывать не нужно. Название - это только название [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия].  
  
Вы добавили тег shop, и этого достаточно для того, чтобы понять, что это магазин.  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:shop  
  
Слово «магазин» удалено:    
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4348756291
Viajero Perdido (2016-08-13 16:39:31+00:00): I swear I typed a new changeset comment.

It was actually: Alberta: various fixes. Named Maligne Lake Road.
MichaelVL (2016-08-13 17:19:29+00:00): Hej,
Normalt annoteres denne slags objekter ikke med fx. 'name=Picnicbord'. 'Name' er beregnet til at navngive objekter som faktisk hedder noget. I dette tilfælde er 'leisure=picnic_table' fuldt ud tilstrækkeligt.
d1g (2016-08-24 12:41:51+00:00): Советую на русском или казахском вести комментарии: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Языки_Казахстана
alexkmbk (2016-08-24 12:47:03+00:00): Я сам из Казахстана, в последнее время начал замечать что многие пишут комментарии на английском и это показалось хорошей идеей, все таки проект международный, некоторыми правками могут заинтересоваться модераторы не говорящие на русском, особенно удалением.
d1g (2016-08-24 13:26:18+00:00): Дело ваше конечно, но англоязычных в Казахстане не больше 50%, я ошибаюсь?

Английские описания я добавляю в description:en=* для каждого объекта - так точнее

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

Обратите внимание на "local language"

Потом, каждый объект объяснять не нужно если это что-то очевидное и по снимку видное.
alexkmbk (2016-08-24 13:30:21+00:00):  Я бы рад каждую правку не комментировать, но с недавних пор мой любимый редактор iD требует их в обязательном порядке.
d1g (2016-08-24 13:33:11+00:00): Не требует или не должен.

Указывать комментарии это хороший тон в OSM - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

На вики мы старались объяснит для чего такое нужно.

Можете предложить вариант тексте где это не будет "требоваться"?
d1g (2016-08-24 13:39:54+00:00): Например, пакеты правок "Bing обрисовал" отличаются от "обновил, исправил" отличаются от "всё детализировал до бордюров" отличаются от "одну неточность исправил"

Причём лучше описывать то, что тегами не удалось отметить (склон крутой низ леса ещё уточнять) или (у дороги, а у речки нужно ещё задетализировать)

"Старый снимок обрисовал, проверьте"
alexkmbk (2016-08-24 13:44:42+00:00): Я не понял вопрос если честно. Моё мнение, надо руководствоваться здравым смыслом, если правка требует пояснения, её нужно дать, особенно это касается удаления или изменения месторасположения, но при добавлении простого объекта, вроде родника или дороги, описывать это кажется лишним. На текущий момент, редактор iD не позволяет сохранить изменения не заполним комментарий.
d1g (2016-08-24 13:57:50+00:00): Согласен с вами, удаления нужно пояснять, но не каждый чих на добавление и детализацию.

Сообщил разработчикам - https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3374, отметьтесь там.
alexkmbk (2016-08-24 14:01:30+00:00): Благодарю! обязательно отмечусь
Harald Hartmann (2016-08-13 19:45:14+00:00): Danke ... war für dieses Jahr eigentlich noch auf meiner ToDo Liste :)
AndriesWijma (2016-11-04 20:14:58+00:00): De brug t.h.v. Gaestmabuorren en de fietsbrug t.h.v. Hillamaweg over de Sintrale As zijn getagd als bridge=viaduct. Deze tag is alleen voor een heel specifiek soort brug en is in Nederland nauwelijks te vinden, zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dviaduct.
Wat we in Nederland viaduct noemen (ongelijkvloerse kruising van twee wegen) wordt in OSM meestal bridge=yes.
AndriesWijma (2016-11-04 20:15:45+00:00): Genoemde tags zijn door mij overigens al aangepast.
maraf24 (2016-08-17 09:29:43+00:00): Please use polish names and don't create duplicates.
mueschel (2016-08-15 10:42:15+00:00): Hi,
you used the key "take_away" - the common spelling is "takeaway". Just fixed it for you.

Cheers, Jan
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2016-08-15 12:04:53+00:00): Thank you.,
Alecs01 (2016-08-14 12:18:08+00:00): Please do not add foreing names under the name=* tag, use name:xx, if relevant (this is not the case I believe)
maraf24 (2016-08-17 09:32:47+00:00): Drzewa nie mają adresów:)
A w nazwie umieszczamy nazwę, a nie opis
skwarek (2016-08-17 11:39:18+00:00): Obok drzewa jest tablica informacyjna gdzie jest info na jakim numerze posesji rośnie drzewko:-)
maraf24 (2016-08-17 11:51:49+00:00): To jest tablica dotycząca drzewa?
maraf24 (2016-08-17 11:55:15+00:00): Poza tym na tej działce byłby numer 18. Byłby, bo oficjalnie ani 16 ani 18 nie jest w użyciu - lubraniec.e-mapa.net
skwarek (2016-08-17 12:03:10+00:00): Dodałbym zdjęcie ale póki co, nie wiem jak to zrobić...
maraf24 (2016-08-17 14:57:07+00:00): Tu się nie da, ale można wrzucić np. na https://postimage.org
*Martin* (2016-08-15 09:27:09+00:00): Ahoj Matej. Prosim namiesto odstranenia cesty a pridania tej istej, hoci pozmenenej jednoznacne preferuj upravu existujucej trasy. Dakujem.
jo_osm (2016-08-29 15:46:28+00:00): Dear Brothers OSM editor, I am happy to see your contribution to the OSM data in Gialos on Ios Island. However, with your changeset 41434716 you have also deleted entirely a piece of road on Giolos beach in front of the hospital. Certainly, this happened by accident and without intention. Can you please correct this by deleting the changeset. I think this would be the easiest way to re-establish the KTEL bus route to Kumbara on this road. I'm happy to help, if you find this difficult. Best regards Jo, jo_osm
user_5359 (2016-08-14 05:28:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node to a building
eggie (2017-02-05 15:09:26+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Ik heb hier http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?zoom=19&lat=51.93259&lon=4.56825&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
de fietspaden verbonden met de autowegen. Er moet altijd een verbindingsnode gemaakt worden ook al mag een fietser niet afslaan. 
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie