piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
olvagor (2017-02-07 17:25:12+00:00): Ich bin da ziemlich leidenschaftslos, änder das gern.

place=locality bezeichnet aber eher einen Flurnamen, das passt nicht so sehr. Möglicherweise kannst du das als Grillplatz taggen, ich bin aber nicht sicher, ob die Bärenhütte tatsächlich sowas ist oder nur ein Unterstand... da wäre Vor-Ort-Recherche nötig.
Felix Schütt (2017-02-09 08:59:20+00:00): Nur damit wir über die gleiche Stelle sprechen: Ich meinte den folgenden Punkt: 

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/556916126

Ist das eine Hütte oder einfach nur ein interessanter Punkt. Unterstand (für Radfahrer, etc.) würde ich als shelter=yes einfügen
hackthemap (2021-09-14 20:30:47+00:00): Sind das alles offizielle Namen (in den Feldern)? Woher kommen die Namen?
fusion-freak (2021-09-15 05:32:46+00:00): Bürger-Gis
changchun_1 (2015-08-13 10:58:51+00:00): Hallo Schnappi die Wege in den Weinbergen von Hessigheim hast du erfasst. Diese sind alle mit access=destination erfasst. Bei der Erfassung sind also auch Fußgänger und Fahrradfahrer nur als Anlieger freigegeben. Ist dies richtig? Sollte es nicht motor_vehicle=destination sein. Es gibt dazu auch einen Note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/303997
Gruß Changchun
apm-wa (2018-02-24 07:03:19+00:00): I am deleting this "road" as it is not a road, it is a gully that in the rainy season is a ditch.  Just got back from a trip down in that area.
Harry Wood (2016-02-05 16:33:11+00:00): There's  a note here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/502032 asking about "trumpers field". Also a note tag added to the object itself. What d'you reckon? Does the name need correcting?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 05:56:53+00:00): Hello!
There is a barrier=g on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/253812945/history that (if I checked correctly) was added in this edit

Do you know what is the meaning of this tag? Is it maybe supposed to be barrier=gate?
user_5359 (2022-04-10 12:54:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23474641/history. What ist the meaning of the tag watch:30891 = 1?
wiso (2022-04-10 14:54:15+00:00): With that tag I get notified when there is a change
user_5359 (2022-04-10 15:34:10+00:00): Please don’t private keys for working purposes! Did you know https://github.com/OSM-de/ChangesetAnalyzer?
user_5359 (2022-04-10 15:34:41+00:00): .. don‘t add private …
wiso (2022-04-11 07:28:58+00:00): I don't have any private key. That is just my id.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-02-16 12:09:10+00:00): Hi. In this edit, you changed the `name` of this stretch of the Zambezi to "Zambeze". Is that right? The name:en is still Zambezi. I thought the "name" was Zambezi?
katpatuka (2018-02-16 15:02:21+00:00): Oh, an 8-year-ago-edit... ;)

I guess it should be Zambezi (don't know why I wrote Zambeze). enwiki starts with "The Zambezi (also spelled Zambeze and Zambesi) is the fourth-longest river in  Africa [...]" though... feel free to change it :)
eggie (2017-09-26 15:37:29+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen.. Opnieuw welkom gestuurd per PB (wat nuttige links en tips)
Miftah IRM-ED (2021-05-06 07:46:49+00:00): hi Johnny Carlsen,
i modified your waterbody based on maxar premium imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/44131001), thank you
Spanholz (2018-07-04 20:19:33+00:00): I know this import happened long time ago but all those buildings are just points and not existing/very badly aligned. Is it really worth anything to have these buildings in our database?
frosm (2020-11-09 23:22:20+00:00): Bonjour,
à quoi correspond ce genre de nom/numéro https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/562651063 ? j'imagine que le coin du batiment n'a pas de nom
Kašpi (2020-11-10 07:55:09+00:00): Bonjour,
pour vrai dire, je ne sais pas. Probablement cela est un "property" de mon GPS que j'ai oublie de supprimer.
marc__marc (2020-12-03 12:21:58+00:00): Bonjour,
en 2009 vous avez renseigné ce bureau de poste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44323205
mais en 2014 quelqu'un a renseigné un autre bureau de poste tout proche https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3126264936
pourriez-vous vérifier si vous en avez l'occasion si le bureau de poste au premier emplacement existe toujours ou s'il a fermé/déménagé ?
Cordialement,
Marc
FTA (2016-08-17 03:26:53+00:00): Hi Metehyi,

I know this changeset was quite some time ago, but you listed your source of this data as geonames.org. Generally that site has issues with its license compatibility (I think that is what was meant by tainted here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Metehyi/diary/8627#comments but also see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geonames).

So a few questions. Were able to obtain this information from another source like was mentioned in the comments? Also was there any community discussion for the import? Do you know what the data license was? For now I just wanted to revive conversation a bit on this. I'm doing some research into the license and data sources of geonames at that time. Thanks for any information you may be able to provide.

Best,

Ethan aka FTA with the Data Working Group
----
traduction automatique

Salut Metehyi,

Je sais que ce changeset était il y a un certain temps, mais vous énuméré votre source de ces données comme geonames.org. En général, ce site a des problèmes avec sa compatibilité de licence (je pense que est ce que l'on entend par "tainted" ici: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Metehyi/diary/8627#comments mais aussi voir http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geonames).

Donc, quelques questions. Nous avons pu obtenir cette information d'une autre source, comme cela a été mentionné dans les commentaires? Il y avait aussi toute discussion communautaire pour l'importation? Savez-vous ce que la licence de données était? Pour l'instant, je voulais juste faire revivre la conversation un peu à ce sujet. Je fais des recherches sur les sources de geonames à ce moment-licence et de données. Merci pour toute information que vous peut être en mesure de fournir.

Salutations,

Ethan aka FTA avec le Data Working Group
FTA (2016-09-02 00:42:11+00:00): Hi again Metehyi,
You haven't provided an alternative source for your data (though you have been editing since my first post), and the data clearly state they are derived from Geonames. Based on internet archive links, Geonames has had the same license since the time of your import. Beyond the links listed above, you can also check out mailing list discussions such as https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2007-May/014019.html or the forum http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=361073#p361073. So, unfortunately this data will have to be reverted and redacted as we cannot meet the licensing requirements of Geonames for use of their data. 

Best,
Ethan aka FTA with the OSMF DWG
----

Maschinenübersetzung

Hallo wieder Metehyi,
Sie haben nicht eine alternative Quelle für die Daten zur Verfügung gestellt (obwohl Sie seit meinem ersten Beitrag bearbeitet haben), und die Daten deutlich, dass sie von Geonames ableiten. Basierend auf den Internet-Archiv Links, Geonames die gleiche Lizenz seit der Zeit des Import hatte. Über die Links oben aufgeführt sind, können Sie auch Mailing-Liste Diskussionen wie https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2007-May/014019.html überprüfen oder das Forum http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=361073#p361073. Also, leider werden diese Daten müssen rückgängig gemacht und unkenntlich gemacht werden, da wir nicht die Lizenzanforderungen von Geonames für die Nutzung ihrer Daten treffen können.

Beste,
Ethan aka FTA mit dem OSMF DWG
mueschel (2022-06-05 10:40:39+00:00): Hallo Ömmes, 
macht es Sinn diese alten "wayparts" Relationen noch zu behalten? Für das meiste gibt es ja inzwischen diverse andere Tags, die hier auch verwendet werden.

Grüße
Jan
eggie (2018-01-04 19:02:48+00:00): Na vele jaren weer aan het mappen, daarom Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
kuhni74 (2022-07-26 16:39:58+00:00): Sorry for writing in English, hope you can understand what I write. There is some confusion about the exact location of Passo di Val Viola. The node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/565086738 should have an elevation of 2426m (according to the Swiss Topo Map 25), not 2475m, but there is no path there. The lowest pass with a path (2431m-2432m according to the Swiss Topo Map 25 and https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passo_di_Val_Viola) is near node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9836007611 and it is used by https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15124465. The pass with the better path (at least on the Italian side) is node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6781381781 (elevation 2470m according to the Swiss Topo Map 25), it has been mapped 3 years ago (with elevation 2460m) by a user who comments that the signs on the pass say this is the "proper" pass. I'd prefer to delete the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/565086738 (as there is no path there) and change its altitude as written above. What do you think?
kuhni74 (2022-07-26 16:42:19+00:00): and here is a fourth pass: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5207981175
kaitu (2022-07-26 20:57:11+00:00): Hi,
thanks for raising this issue, pretty confusing indeed. Unfortunately I have no direct knowledge of the places.

I had imported node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/565086738 some 12 years ago from the Lombardy database. I have checked and the name is still there in the current version, but: it's not on saddle, the elevation doesn't match the current digital elevation model, and OSM doesn't show any path nearby. I would tell you to just delete it as wrong, and move the wikidata and wikipedia tags to a better candidate for the true pass.

But which one?

The node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5207981175 has a close guidepost named Pass da Val Viola. (It's probably the same pass which the lombardy database names Passo Confine - Border Pass, and which should also be deleted as is not on a path).

The node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6781381781 is also the "proper pass" according to the mapper.

It's also conceivable both mappers are right, but Switzerland and Italy don't agree and place a sign with the same name on different passes.
kuhni74 (2022-07-27 02:20:43+00:00): Thank you very much for your efforts! I moved the easternmost (old) pass object to the west (2431m) and left a note with it. I also added a note on the south-western pass and added the word "mountainbike" to the northern pass, which is in fact a bit higher than the "Passo Confine" (which is also displayed in the Swiss Topo Map), so I left also this one. Do you agree?
kaitu (2022-07-27 08:34:00+00:00): For the 2431 m pass, having a mountain_pass on a path makes sense. I slightly retagged it, leaving only the reference to Swiss Topo, seems more straightforward. The CTR identifier never belonged to OSM anyway, I should have never imported it. I also removed the saddle tag, as its some 150 m aside of  a real saddle point (am I too strict here?). And moved it slightly into the path to become one of its nodes.

I appreciate your efforts to clarify a confused situation, but I'm not sure that I like the "mountainbike" word added to the name of the 2460 pass. I understand the purpose, but this belongs to a description key to my mind.
I trusted the guidepost node and added its name as local name to the pass as well ("Pass da" sounds like the local dialect for the italian "Passo di"). It could also be promoted to an alt_name if its widespread and used also by tourists.
kuhni74 (2022-07-27 08:56:13+00:00): Thank you very much again. Seems this is going to be a Ph.D.'s effort... Maybe we should leave it 90% perfect, not trying to get 100% (which is probably not possible for several reasons, anyway).
I was aware that the "mountainbike" name component would be somewhat unorthodox, but I'm bothered about three or more nodes having the same name... the "mountain_pass" tag for the 2431m instance would be generally fine with me, but as far as I read from the Swiss Topo 25 map (https://map.geo.admin.ch/, with an Italian user interface available at the top right corner), it IS also a natural saddle; and if I'm wrong, I'm just asking myself where the lowermost "natural=saddle" is going to be if we ever wish to have it there (I need not have it, it's complicated enough).
And as concerns the "dialect", I'm pretty sure that "Pass da..." is the official Lombard (lmo) version, which is officially used in many cases in this area both on OSM and the Wikis (e.g. "Corn da Camp", "Scima da Saoseo").
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-22 09:29:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/565295467/history has shop = health that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=health ? Current tag is not clear at all and can be made more specific... Is it place selling something medical-related?

or some place where alt-medicine practice is operating?

is it just a pharmacy? Then amenity=pharmacy should work

Or somehow differs from regular pharmacy?

If it is not a pharmacy - would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=medical_supply describe it well?

maybe it could be shop=herbalist ? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=herbalist )

maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=health_food or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=nutrition_supplements ?

Is it maybe a doctor office/clinic/etc? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclinic  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddoctors)

or is it something else? Maybe it does not exist at all?
Anisa IRM-ED (2021-07-07 03:10:56+00:00): Hola, Álvaro Salazar
Espero que estés bien

ID de relación: 146117 (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/146117) está marcado como restricción de giro, pero no está bien formado: no hay una sola ruta navegable para restringir, esto la restricción puede ser redundante o debe dividirse en múltiples relaciones.
No noto una restricción de giro a la izquierda y solo veo una señal unidireccional basada en una imagen mapillary (https://is.gd/SCmYSr).
Le importaría arreglarlo / modificarlo? No pude encontrar ninguna fuente de imágenes válida para solucionarlo.
Gracias!

traducido por Google
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-10-19 09:30:14+00:00): I presume we don't need this "addr:townland" tags anymore? 😁 I was curious what  source:name="bin tag" was, but I figure it's  the tag on the bins. 😁

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/445524863#map=19/52.77909/-8.43159

I have removed that here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63672202
eggie (2021-05-13 13:18:34+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Graf Westerholt (2017-01-16 07:58:04+00:00): Warum hast du den Geh- und Fahrradweg an der Müller-Breslau-Straße extra eingetragen? Das kann man doch viel einfacher mit http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway=track taggen.
VictorIE (2020-06-18 09:34:03+00:00): Hi,

What is this?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44878585
plush (2020-06-18 20:09:16+00:00): We took the train and passed under a bridge. I only saw the bridge from the train, so I don't know what it connects to. Since the data was captued from a fast-moving train, it's entirely possible that the location is off and it's actually a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83069661 added by Dermot a year later.
VictorIE (2020-06-19 00:32:11+00:00): OK. There used to be a railway over rail bridge near there also.

I'll delete it.

For the record, this is the very last instance of highway=road on the island of Ireland. :)
user_5359 (2023-04-11 08:54:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/44887611/history. What is the mean of the tags
FG:COND_INDEX = 0.4
FG:GPS_DATE = 2000/12/06
FG:ORG_CODE = 14554
FG:RTE = 905
FG:area = 4020.1
FG:datafile = ASH.cor
FG:lane_miles = 0.06
FG:perimeter = 92.64
FG:photo = 0
FG:route = 905
FG:rte_description = From Rte 109, @ reservoir
FG:station = Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge
FG:visitors = 0
ID = 14554-905-001
condition = FAIR
district = 00
prop_description = FWS Parking
rating = 5.0
x_coordinate = -116.329
y_coordinate = 36.412
?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-13 06:01:39+00:00): Also, what was the license of data imported here?
Marc2m (2020-07-17 19:33:19+00:00): There is no separate access to the parking lot for customers of the "Quick" restaurant, the parking lot is used by all shops there. I am rather new at OpenStreetMap. How can this best be resolved? Is it OK to simply remove the "fixme" tag?
Protoxenus (2016-12-13 19:26:22+00:00): Bin gerade auf einen Änderungssatz gestoßen, der mir nicht schlüssig ist. Die Grundschule "Thomas Müntzer" hieß früher Dorfstraße? Bitte mal überprüfen ob das wirklich so war, oder ob alle Adressen die früher in der Dorfstraße lagen, einfach neu benamst wurden und dann old_name dazu gefügt wurde.
Gruß Protoxenus
geoosm (2016-12-17 18:31:44+00:00): Nee, das ist natuerlich Bloedsinn.
Bin mir auch nicht bewusst, dass ich da diesbezueglich was gemacht haette.
Ich habe eigentlich nur die Strassenbezeichnung geaendert, da sich diese geaendert hat.
Warum nun auch die Bushaltestelle und die Schule den old_name bekommen haben, weiss ich nicht.
Protoxenus (2016-12-18 08:58:17+00:00): Habe die old_name tags von Schule und Bushaltestelle entfernt.
Gruß Protoxenus
Nmxosm (2018-09-12 07:42:58+00:00): Die Addressen, die in diesem Changeset erfasst wurden, sind (inzwischen?) falsch. Korrigiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62510172
Hawkeye (2015-10-10 21:17:17+00:00): Hi Chris, thanks for your cycle mapping Livingston. There was a small mapping party in Livingston today and we discussed the Local Cycle Network. It is widely recognised that the main shared use paths in Livingston are part of the local cycle network. But we weren't sure if the core path reference numbers should be used as they are not signposted on the ground and could be confusing to map users. Do you agree?
ChrisB (2015-10-10 22:29:12+00:00): As they are not signposted, perhaps the correct tag should be "unsigned_ref"? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned_ref

afaik the tags only appear on the cycle map rendering, which won't render unsigned references.
Hawkeye (2015-10-10 22:40:39+00:00): Thanks Chris for your reply. That looks like a useful tag to use. Any objections if I change to using this tag?
ChrisB (2015-10-10 22:45:11+00:00): No objection.
Hawkeye (2015-10-10 22:48:40+00:00): Thanks for your help. Happy mapping.
muralito (2016-07-19 14:39:12+00:00): Hola fagervan.

Ando revisando los amenity=police de Uruguay y me encontre con este nodo que creaste vos, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/573409372 y como nota tiene "Ba, Arg" asi que no me queda claro si algo te quedo mal ubicado o que paso.

Si podes revisarlo, te agradezco.
user_5359 (2017-03-20 19:29:53+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of your different ways only marked with name=Sandhills? Please see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nEs
stevea (2017-03-20 19:39:51+00:00): These are a unique-to-the-area geological formation of rock/sand which give rise to the frequent quarries in the area (many largely "played out" and now closed).  In the middle Miocene epoch (about 15 million years ago) this area was underwater/ocean and today these areas are often part of boundary=protected_area polygons because of the endemic unique plant and animal life that are there, some are found only on Earth right here and are endanged species.

As I am not sure what the proper "geological-oriented" tags are, and these ARE unique local geography, I have identified them (roughly, the polygons are rather crude) so that they may be tagged with better tags in the future as these evolve.  Do you have any suggestions?
user_5359 (2017-03-20 19:49:34+00:00): Did you read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural?
stevea (2017-03-20 19:56:26+00:00): Many times, but there are no values for that key which seem appropriate.  It may be time to "coin" one (make one up).  However, it is so local and unique, that I have been reluctant to do this.

You might do a Google search on "Santa Cruz sandhills" or look at http://www.santacruzsandhills.com if you wish to do some research to help me.  These have always proven fairly easy to map (crudely, with a rough polygon) but I always get stuck when it is time to tag them.  They have many unusual aspects to them like shark's teeth from millions of years ago to strange green beetles which are found nowhere else.  It's like a strange weird island world in the middle of the forest.  I actually live within site of one and it is a genuinely unusual feature upon this local part of the Earth.
user_5359 (2017-03-20 20:15:22+00:00): I see some similarities with a dune. Did you know the Dune of Pilat (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dune_of_Pilat, http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2244861#map=15/44.5888/-1.2179 )?

The parts with fossils can be marked with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:geological%3Dpalaeontological_site .
stevea (2017-03-20 20:27:10+00:00): Thank you, although these are much more geologically and biologically rich than a simple sand dune.  They are a wholly unique feature on the landscape.  Some of them actually are protected within boundary=protected_area, protect_class=1a, 6 or 7, however, when they fall upon private property (as they often do), they are not.  However, I strongly believe they need to be identified on our map, so I put them into OSM.

I am considering adding the tag geological=sandhills, however, when I attempt to edit the wiki (and I have written thousands of lines and many pages of wiki in OSM) it will not let me enter a new table row.
stevea (2017-03-20 20:38:03+00:00): Now I believe that geological=outcrop might be about right, but it's still pretty rough.
stevea (2017-03-20 20:49:54+00:00): I have added geological=outcrop to these data, along with a FIXME tag which describes them as rough and needing additional refinement.  Thank you for your help!
dadavid (2024-05-08 09:00:04+00:00): Hi koshka, 

war der Node hier [1] Absicht oder hast du da aus Versehen waypoints aus deinem gpx track mit hochgeladen? :) 

Grüße

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/574315093/history
koshka (2024-05-08 16:06:09+00:00): War ein Anfängerfehler vor 14 Jahren :) 
=> ist gelöscht.
dadavid (2024-05-09 21:45:41+00:00): alles klar, danke dir fürs fixen und weiterhin viel Spass beim mappen :)
flohoff (2018-04-23 12:07:44+00:00): Hi Araneus,

du hast in diesem Changeset einen Löschteich angelegt. Ich habe da 2-3 Gedanken zu.

Das erste ist - Das IST ein Löschteich - Der heisst nicht so - Also sollte das nicht in den name tag. Wenn du das versenken willst dann ist das in einem note Tag denke ich besser aufgehoben.

Das zweite ist das der Löschenteil jetzt als landuse=basin eingetragen ist und von einem natural=wood umschlossen wird. Damit gehört Flächenmäßig ja das basin zum Wald. Da bedürfte es noch irgendeiner multipolygon relation um das auszuschneiden. 

Der natural=wood um den Feuerlöschteich  ist das wirklich ein "Urwald"? Das ist doch eher ein typisch deutsches Gehölz wo irgendjemand sich dann mal Brennholz schneiden darf oder? Dann ist das tendentiell auch eher ein landuse=forest als ein natural=wood.

So - meine 5 Gedanken zu dem Thema

Flo
flohoff (2018-04-23 12:09:47+00:00): Vergisses - du warst gar nicht author des Waldes. Den hat Bielebog gerade erst hinzugefügt :)

Flo
marc__marc (2024-10-10 01:29:10+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40697379
avec quoi as-tu corrigé la position ?
note=translated serrait sans doute plus clair sous la forme source:geometry=* ou not:source:geometry=cadastre
Cordialement,
Marc
Mickey86 (2024-10-10 05:54:14+00:00): Bonjour Marc,
Honnêtement je ne me rappelle plus, ça fait presque 15 ans que je suis intervenu sur cet ensemble de modifications… Mais j'utilisais les outils standards de l'époque (JOSM + Cadastre), le décalage est probablement pour corriger une projection erronée du cadastre dans JOSM.