piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gseethar (2018-12-03 10:07:27+00:00): Hi Lukas,
Thanks for your update.
The edit done by Shadty was wrong and post your suggestion, one of our senior editor has made the change. Thanks for your update.
We have advised the editor to maintain higher standard of edits and will be monitoring his edits closely.

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Ganesh.
freebeer (2018-12-03 13:48:25+00:00): Hallo Ganesh,
Can i make a suggestion?

With so many organised mappers editing around the world, it is difficult for me to tell at a glance who works where.

This makes it difficult for me, where, for example, i have been troubleshooting Lyft edits with six changesets in one place from different lyft employees, whose connection i try to verify.

it would be helpful if your employees were to add a suffix like _amazon or _al (i think you are connected to amazon logistics - apologies if it is a different organisation) to your usernames used to edit the map.

this is not required, but after i have been able to connect the _telenav suffix to their usernames, it is easy to identify their work and edits and remember the connection, and is something i now appreciate.

.

With regards to this changeset contents, i see your editor was using aerial imagery of
imagery_used Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta

This is an unfortunate misleading name, as one usually understands Beta to refer to the newest version of a product, but in fact the images are probably about ten years old, even if in many cases in germany they are the best-looking, thus the name Clarity.

I wish the Beta would be dropped and an indication of their age be given with a word like Archive or something...

Apologies if you knew that, but anyone who uses the Clarity images should compare them with all the other aerials available before thinking about making a decision on that imagery - it is good for alignment in most cases, though.

thanks...
freebeer (2018-12-04 13:43:31+00:00): A further hint, as i see this edit was made with iD as editor, and Lukas pointed to the above comment in another changeset:

As you are editing here in germany, you may come to the conclusion as i did editing in Freiburg im Breisgau, that the Clarity images are both the easiest to work with and most accurate, but a different imagery source, perhaps Digital Globe, is most up-to-date, in any given region.

My editor, Potlatch (an end-of-life product) allows me to open a floating window with a different background imagery so that i can see differences between the two where on-the-ground changes exist, without the pain of switching from one background layer to another.

I do not know if iD offers this ability -- i have not found it in the few times i've used iD.  I'm almost positive that JOSM must offer such a feature.

i do not know what your mapping focus is and whether this feature would be useful - i imagine it is most useful if someone edits extensively in an area without a particular focus.

if your team is all using iD to edit, i strongly encourage you to look into JOSM, for one reason that it is far more powerful, but a second more important reason is that in troubleshooting problems in mountain view california, resulting from edits carried out by the Lyft mapping team using iD, that through no fault of theirs, route relationships were being damaged.

as you may be touching objects that are part of a relation - not here, but there exist at least two on the street about 100m west - if you are doing the same sort of work as lyft (adding details), you may run the risk of damaging a route without knowing it.

this is one of several bugs or serious deficiencies in iD when handling relations.  it may work well for small changes like here, but keep in mind it is not as powerful as JOSM and i have seen many mistakes being made as a result of iD design decisions.  (not that you cannot do a lot of damage with JOSM, because of course you can, just as i have spent the last three days cleaning up after damage and vandalism created with potlatch.)

just another tip from me; if it does not apply to your work focus or flow, no big deal, as i am sure someone will find this useful.  maybe.  or not.   probably not.

danke
gseethar (2018-12-10 07:17:20+00:00): Thanks a lot Freebeer.
We would like to thank you for taking your time to give your valuable suggestions. 

Your suggestions on the various tools and their advantages and disadvantages was extremely helpful and we will look into it and see how it can improve our processes.
Always happy to engage and learn from the community.

Regards,
Ganesh
ToniE (2018-10-04 07:51:06+00:00): Hello shadty,

from the mappilary photos
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.081207228254584&lng=11.871697511379011&z=16.71749584191629&pKey=gUKCBUQ2tRz2DBTho6fHuQ&focus=photo
I can see that there are no turning restrictiosn but highway
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81250840
is rather a oneway path and quite small.

I'll change that accordingly and will delete the three turn restrictions.

Best regards
Toni
gseethar (2018-10-04 13:16:13+00:00): Hi Toni,

Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us. As the mapillary image is available only for one end of the street and since it shows "DO NOT ENTER" board and not "ONE WAY" the editor had made the turn restriction instead of changing the directionality of the road.
Thanks for helping us with your local knowledge.
Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.
Regards,
Ganesh
juminet (2018-10-05 13:16:39+00:00): Bonjour, 

Bienvenue sur OSM! Votre dernière édition du cimétière de Gembloux comporte quelques erreurs: vous avez supprimé 'landuse=cemetery', ce qui enlève le principal tag de cet objet, (qui a d'ailleurs disparu du rendu sur osm.org). L'ajout de landuse_1 n'est pas supporté à ma connaissance et de toute façon, landuse=garden n'est pas expliqué sur le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse.
Timur_Crimea (2018-10-04 08:34:47+00:00): Светофор, не светАфор.
viloan (2018-10-04 06:02:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
nevw (2018-10-04 07:54:16+00:00): Hi
Red Bottle is already mapped on a node. You should add your extra details to it instead of adding another un-necessary node. Also, please fix the format of the opening hours to the examples provided here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples
juhanjuku (2018-10-04 15:17:26+00:00): You are using Esri World Imagery for your corrections, but this imagery is shifted. Suggest to use Estonia Ortho (Maaamet) which is more precise
Morst (2018-10-04 16:39:50+00:00): OK. Thanks
pangoSE (2018-10-04 20:50:49+00:00): Hej, 
Välkommen till OSM.
Visst är det kul?
Jag undrar varför du tog bort vägen igen?
Skriv gärna kommentarer på alla ändringar du gör.
Mvh
Egil
PS: Gå gärna med i en Telegram-chat, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts
Finns även en specifikt för SE.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-06-25 09:10:09+00:00): This edit is disfiguring Charoen Krung 32 drive; partially reverted in changeset 70548617 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70548617>.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-06-29 07:15:22+00:00): #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis?

The geometry of w630447115 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630447115> (a.k.a. Charoen Krung 41 drive) as you mapped here is wrong, very misleading, and legally dangerous.

This driveway does not link roads together, it is a cul-de-sac connected to Charoen Krung road. To make it worse, it is a *private* cul-de-sac that ended with a fence.

I have checked Bing and ESRI imagery, and they did not have any definite visibility for things under tollways; yet you went ahead and "assumed" the connection anyway. I have no words...

This is the geometry you mapped:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/6gz5qJ.png>

This is what it really is:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/ji304E.png>

During an in-person verification survey of this, landlord (who was supervising a construction work there) approached me and informed me that this driveway is actually on a private land; starting from the edge of the main Charoen Krung road- access is allowed only for those who are having business with establishments located there, not for general public. And I was asked to leave.

The driveway was likely not mapped by passerby for this reason. If you are going to map this kind of stuff, do it with a *real survey* where actual length of the road and proper access mode can be noted; not just lazily sitting in your office- overinterpreting imagery like there's no tomorrow.

Making edits like this from the air, apart from misleading people to be trapped in cul-de-sacs, it can land your (Grab's) and other unsuspecting OSM users into trespassing charges. This is a highly irresponsible act for a so-called GIS company.

The offending part is reverted in changeset #71596036 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71596036> and fixed in changeset #71727548 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71727548>.
aharvey (2018-10-04 12:05:27+00:00): Hey Warin, the mine you added from the LPI Base Map already exists in OSM from a more accurate survey at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2057044065 so I've deleted the one you added.
aharvey (2018-10-04 12:09:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mountain_pass is probably a good idea for those mountain passes, as it's well documented on the wiki. I couldn't find any documentation of the landform tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landform
Warin61 (2018-10-04 22:37:24+00:00): Thanks for spotting the mine. I did download a small area around it but obviously not big enough. Trouble is ..it does not render :)

Pass ... umm the OSM key mountain_pass is for a road. I am adverse to using the key natural as that confusingly applies to both 'natural' and 'unnatural' things so looses all meaning. OSM has pages for landuse and landcover .. the only remaining 'natural' item is landform (peaks, saddles etc) .. so I use that.
aharvey (2018-10-05 00:32:19+00:00): It renders in OsmAnd :) Activity to get it rendering on the main OSM map https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/331

It would be great if you could document your landform usage on the wiki as a proposal or just on the tagging list so we can discuss it?
Warin61 (2018-10-05 00:34:52+00:00): Still have to deal with the proposed 'ephemeral' !
Then there is public transport v2 that I said i'd do a bit on... 
lots 'to do' :)
Truchin (2018-10-23 11:36:33+00:00): Bonjour Simon,

C'est quoi le signalement utilisateur géovélo. Sur l'avenue de la Grande Armée, l'aménagement cyclable entre le bd Pereire et la rue St Ferdinand a disparu d'OSM...
simon_geovelo (2018-10-24 07:36:57+00:00): Voici le signalement. 
http://www.amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/4922
Après discussion en privé avec l'utilisateur et contrôle sur le terrain nous en avions conclu que la piste existait bien. Par contre j'ai un peut trop supprimé de piste cyclable, je viens de corriger. 
Dit moi si il manque encore des morceaux
Truchin (2018-10-24 13:51:40+00:00): Je ne pense pas que ce soit une bonne idée de déchiqueter la piste à chaque arrêt de bus. Dans cette logique, il faudrait interrompre les aménagements cyclables à chaque PPC (passage porte cochère) et traversée de carrefour.
simon_geovelo (2018-10-25 07:03:19+00:00): Cela ne me dérange pas si tu remet la piste cyclable le long de l’arrêt de bus
Truchin (2018-10-25 09:12:11+00:00): OK
Cascafico (2018-10-04 08:10:26+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM!

il civico 176 era già esistente all'inizio della laterale di Via Torino. Considera che andrebbe messo dove c'è la targhetta, poi elimina uno dei due.
Stefano Mazzega (2018-10-05 07:07:50+00:00): grazie.

la targhetta è presente nel punto che ho indicato.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-05-30 11:14:03+00:00): This edit is now partially reverted in changeset 70764812 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70764812> and 70764990 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70764990> 70764990 in the General Post Office parking lot.

Reasons:

You attempted to draw a driveway that crosses over a chain link barrier separating two parking areas.

And apart from this wrong entrance drivway, the correct entrance of the parking lot in question (at its N/E corner) is not marked.

This shows that you lot didn't even bother surveying the thing before messing with locals' works.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-07-03 07:38:10+00:00): #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis?

House Number 1 doesn't have any driveway curving around on its north side. I wonder how did you came up with this rubbish anyway...

What you mapped:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/CNZy83.png>

ESRI overlay:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/JtWEuN.png>

Bing overlay:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/udQIRB.png>

DigitalGlobe Standard overlay:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/VA9350.png>

So, you just marked anything you saw on Digial Globe Standard as narrow and "gray" as *residential* street, without even bother to cross-check against ESRI, or even Bing?

That's really crude even for an armchair mapper; and your company said you were going to "improve" OSM?

How hypocritical.

This part of the changeset is now reverted in changeset 71822150 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71822150>.

For other reviewers, this is what it actually is:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/0x3xDS.png>
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-07-03 07:42:30+00:00): #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis?

A crooked "service driveway" branching from Captain Bush lane... that goes through a *fence*? And into where exactly?

What you mapped:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/NglgXr.png>

ESRI overlay:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/mI74bQ.png>

Bing overlay:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/HLi576.png>

DigitalGlobe Standard overlay:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/3sfo55.png>

Apart from not surveying the damn thing; out of all imagery, you chose the one most outdated on as possible. And forget cross-checking 'cause that's obviously too much to ask from a *paid* corporate armchair mapper...

This rubbish is now reverted, again, in changeset #71822438 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71822438>.

For other reviewers, this is what it actually is:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/XTR2as.png>
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-07-06 09:38:41+00:00): #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis?

This whole edit is becoming an epitome of how armchair mapping could go wrong...

What about this "residential road" connecting between Captain Bush lane and Charoen Krung road?

The so-called "residential road" you mapped:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/Va30Nh.png>

ESRI overlay:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/o9UGht.png>

Bing overlay:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/9nspx3.png>

DigitalGlobe Standard overlay:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/pTNXGR.png>

I have taken trouble to actually check these on the ground and...

- Its east entrance cannot be found.
- Its south entrance is gated, short, and ended at a restaurant.

You are misled by imagery, duped by the shadows. Without actual survey to back things up, your methodology is invalid.

This edit is now reverted further in changeset 71893823 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71893823>.

For other reviewers; the correct parts are added with ground survey via:

- Changeset 71954288 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71954288>
- Changeset 71954406 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71954406>

This is what it really is, as far as ground-based observation can gather:
<https://u.cubeupload.com/xwindows/NGprHH.png>
Truchin (2018-10-19 10:08:34+00:00): Ce n'est pas écrit dans le wiki qu'une voie de desserte ne peut pas être une voie de service.
Je pense que "service" était plus adapté que "eésidential" car c'est en pratique une contre-allée et pas une voie résidentielle qui a été doublée par une voie primaire
simon_geovelo (2018-10-19 11:30:31+00:00): Sur cette page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dservice il est écrit "Note: Ce n'est pas la bonne façon de baliser une voie de desserte (aussi appelée à tort voie de service), qui devrait plutôt être balisée avec une autre valeur de route. "
Et la définition de la voie de desserte "Une voie de desserte (également appelé « chemin de desserte », « route de desserte », « desserte », « chaussée latérale » où de façon peu correcte « voie de service », « route latérale » etc.) est une route mineure parallèle à une route majeure à une vitesse plus grande – souvent dans un contexte urbain." ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Voie_de_desserte .
Truchin (2018-10-19 12:48:49+00:00): Oui sauf qu'ici ce n'est pas une route mineure parallèle mais bien une voie de service. Il n'y a qu'à voir la manière dont sont traitées les intersections et la partie au niveau du 10 de l'avenue.
Je reste convaincu que dans ce cas particulier, c'est une erreur de passer les contre allées en residential.
Par contre, je n'ai pas du tout le même avis sur l'avenue Charles de Gaulle à Neuilly
simon_geovelo (2018-10-19 13:19:42+00:00): C'est quoi ta définition de la voie de service ?
Truchin (2018-10-19 13:35:04+00:00): une voie qui ne sert pas au transit (hors impasses)
simon_geovelo (2018-10-19 14:50:52+00:00): En relisant la version anglaise et française de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dservice je me dit que la définition n'est pas très claire. 

On lance une discussion sur Talk-FR ?
Truchin (2018-10-19 15:01:29+00:00): On peut j'ai bien peur qu'on n'arrive pas à un consensus sur ce cas particulier.
Il faut que je me renseigne s'il n'y a pas (à Paris du moins) une réglementation particulière pour les contre-allées
Truchin (2018-10-23 16:15:48+00:00): Pour les contre allées parisienne, c'est généralement une voie de service qui a été créée après coup pour des raisons diverses et variées (souvent pour y ajouter du stationnement). Ce n'est pas une voie de déserte locale.
L'article du wiki a été rédigé ainsi pour éviter qu'on passe en primary tous les abords des voies principales.
Si on passe en "residential" les contre-allées de l'avenue Carnot, cela va faire très bizarre...
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-04 09:50:32+00:00): Reverted Anaičiai back to locality as there is no such hamlet Anaičiai there (by official records). Also reverted population count (there is no way there are 70 registered persons). Removed duplicate node of Anaičiai cemetery.
When updating data, please change existing object rather than deleting old one and creating a new one - this loses history of edits.
tux67 (2018-10-04 12:36:21+00:00): amenity=first_aid_school gibt's leider nicht und würde so auch nicht auf der Karte angezeigt.
was sprach gegen healthcare=yes und healthcare:speciality=first_aid_training? So sollte es mit einem Erste Hilfe Symbol auf die Karte kommen .. 
ggf. noch ein description tag dazu mit "Erste Hilfe Training" als Inhalt.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63185000
tux67 (2018-10-05 13:09:16+00:00): Hi,

den healthcare Vorschlag hatte ich "verbrochen". Um ein brauchbares Tagging zu diesem Fall zu erörtern habe ich im Forum mal einen Thread eröffnet:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63984

Gruß
tux67
GotNoName (2018-10-04 09:00:19+00:00): Avec une autre vue satellite j'ai pu refaire le lotissement. Ce ne sont pas les maison les plus belles mais c'est un début.
tux67 (2018-10-04 12:22:09+00:00): Hi,
die facebook seite (keine offizielle btw.) war hier schon als contact:facebook gemappt (kann man die nicht bei maps.me sehen?
Die eigentliche webseite habe ich jetzt auch dazugepackt http://zorbasmg.de/
Sag mal bitte ob die Einträge nach dem contact: schema in Maps.me nicht auftauchen .. das wär ja blöd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Key:contact
axaxax (2018-10-04 13:17:18+00:00): Hi :)
Der FB-Link war auf Maps.Me nicht zu sehen. Das kann ich an einem anderen Gerät immer noch nachvollziehen. 
Bei „Pocket Earth“, „Scout GPS“, und „Magic Earth“ sieht man ebenfalls nichts. 
In „OSMAnd“ kann ich den FB-Link jedoch sehen. 
Werde in Zukunft keine FB-Links mehr eintragen, danke für den Hinweis!
Bei Maps.Me wird folgendes angezeigt (bzw. ist editierbar):
Straße 
Hausnummer 
PLZ
Geschäftszeiten 
Telefon
Webseite
E-Mail 
Küche 
Betreiber oder Eigentümer
WLAN

lg ax
tux67 (2018-10-04 13:44:32+00:00): Tja .. vielleicht eine nachricht an die maps.me Entwickler wert. contact: setze ich immer da ein, wo auch (oder nur - das gibt's ja auch) eine FB Seite (grusel) von dem Geschäft zu finden ist. 
Notfalls stelle ich alles in diesem CS auf contact: um, da man soch auch zwischen Mobiltelefon und Festnetz unterscheiden kann.
Gruß
Stephan
Digne (2018-10-04 19:47:30+00:00): Hallo,

Ik zag dat er om feedback was gevraagd. 

Ik neem aan dat het om stoplichten voor het voetpad gaat. De mooiste manier zou zijn om hetzelfde te doen als bij de Lange Wal. Dus aan beide kanten van de kruising highway=traffic_signals en traffic_signals:direction=forward of backward.
pangoSE (2018-10-04 20:52:22+00:00): Välkommen till OSM.
Visst är det kul?
Vad menar du med "justerat taket"?
Var noga med dina kommentarer, speciellt om du tar bort saker.
Mvh
Egil
PS: Gå gärna med i en Telegram-chat, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts
Finns även en specifikt för SE.
eggie (2018-10-04 10:20:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-04 10:23:47+00:00): Het is niet de bedoeling om gebouwen van vorm te veranderen. Alles is ingemeten door het kadaster en als zodanig geïmporteerd. Dit was je edit.. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit het beste aan het Kadaster doorgeven via hun site.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=zwaluw%2024%20st&resultOffset=0&objectId=0180200000006764&geometry.x=210979.32040052&geometry.y=517094.4115982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0180010000003751
eggie (2018-10-04 10:42:35+00:00): reverted door  Wijzigingenset #63190254 

Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. Overkappingen/carport  voorzichtig intekenen (apart)  met building = roof. Het gaat anders fout bij hernieuwde periodieke import.
abakus_uploader (2018-10-04 22:30:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2018-10-04 10:24:44+00:00): Oke