piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
Mannivu (2022-03-28 09:44:16+00:00): Ciao. Gli eventi temporanei non vanno mappati.
eggie (2022-04-14 06:46:00+00:00): Beste Teek...

Zou je hier nog wat aandacht aan kunnen besteden  of is de 'verdwenen' landuse even blijven liggen. Het triggert anders medemappers.
Waar de landuse niet renderde aan de oostzijde bij de Gasunie-overslag door selfintersecting ways heb ik al wat hersteld. 
MVG
eggie
bxl-forever (2022-03-28 14:35:09+00:00): Hello,
We don’t use addr:unit in Belgium.
If the address is "2A", then we write 2A for the number.
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
eggie (2022-03-27 21:38:38+00:00): Tag Nehler... Solch ein Stop_position ist mitglied einer routerelation..
Aber mit editor iD  klappt das nicht.

Dan sollte man editor JOSM benützen. 
Vielleicht guckt einer der Spezialisten noch. 

Grüss,
eggie
Leo Slager (2022-03-27 22:08:57+00:00): https://reisinfo.gvb.nl/nl/lijnen/12/12STR3H
Der Stop_position ist in andere Spur.
"Fixme=position nicht sicher" hin zu gegeben.
Routerelation geändert.
bxl-forever (2022-04-07 23:14:40+00:00): Hello,

Warning: you erased oneway:bicycle=no on this street.  This tag is useful to guide cyclists because it is one-way for cars but cyclists are exempted from this thanks to the white signs.
I will restore it.

I see you are using StreetComplete.  When prompted to describe the type of cycleway, be sure to correctly choose "none but cyclists may use the road in both directions" instead of "there is no cycleway".

Starting with version 42.0 of StreetComplete, it will now trigger a warning if your answers break existing tags.

Happy mapping.
eggie (2022-03-28 11:22:17+00:00): foot=permissive hunzugefügt..
Hier gibt es das 'Pieterpad deel 2 '- 02... Ein Wanderweg. 

Bitte nicht access=no hier..

Grüss Eggie
jordan_osm (2022-03-29 12:40:51+00:00): Also add bicyle=permissive to all paths between Oude Ijsselweg and Nieuwe Sluisweg? It's a popular place to walk and cycle
eggie (2022-03-28 11:19:41+00:00): Tag Günter.. Hier gibt es ein wichtiger Wanderroute.
Ik habe acces=no geändert in private mit foot=permissive..
Grüss
eggie
gscholz (2022-04-02 08:55:32+00:00): Hi porfiriopaiz,
this changeset has created intersecting boundary lines caused by shifting the position of the boundaries of relation "Santa María de Pantasma (Municipio)":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-85.97500&lat=13.16617&zoom=11

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118995224

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
porfiriopaiz (2022-04-02 17:15:24+00:00): Hello gscholz,

Thank you for reporting this.

Actually I was trying to fix this but it seems I messed it up even more.

I will fix this.

Thanks,
Porfirio
mavl (2022-03-30 14:47:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
eggie (2022-03-27 21:10:39+00:00): Dag Olivier  
Tip.. 
De juiste tag is man_made=mast 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast
Dat kan het best op een node.
Zo'n mast kan natuurlijk wel weer op een gebouw staan. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-27 21:12:04+00:00): Maar up to you...
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
emarv (2022-04-11 06:57:23+00:00): Cześć. Z czego wynika, że szlak czerwony ma teraz dwa przebiegi w tym miejscu?
voltairovicz (2022-04-11 08:49:52+00:00): Dlaczego ma dwa przebiegi, to jest mi naprawdę ciężko określić. W każdym razie w terenie oznaczenia występują na obu jego odnogach, aż sam zgłupiałem idąc tamtędy. Ponadto przyglądałem się mapom (zarówno w internecie jak i na różnych tablicach na terenie gminy Oborniki) i istnieje rozbieżność w przebiegu, jedne mapy pokazują przebieg obok kościoła Serca Pana Jezusa oraz PS2, inne mapy pokazywały przebieg obok Grzybka i ulicy Parkowej. W związku z brakiem jednej, ostatecznej wersji postanowiłem zmapować obydwie odnogi, bo w końcu też tak jest w terenie, no chyba że są to jakies dwa osobne, czerwone szlaki, albo postanowiono zmienić przebieg, jednakże w terenie farby z drzew, słupów i ogrodzeń nikt nie zmywał
emarv (2022-04-11 08:52:58+00:00): Być może, tak jak napisałeś, zmieniono przebieg, a nie zamalowano starych oznakowań. Dziękuję za informacje.
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
eggie (2022-03-28 11:31:00+00:00): Hi,
bicycle=no ist schon default..

Guck mahl hier ... 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#The_Netherlands

Grüss
eggie
limes11 (2022-06-05 08:12:53+00:00): Hi, 

hier war bereits Wald erfasst. Du hast nun eine zweite Waldfläche drübergelegt. 

Entweder wir nehmen dies wieder raus, oder die andere Waldfläche wird entsprechend verkleinert. Aktuell ist es nicht gut.

Viele Grüße, Limes
GeoBoris (2022-03-27 20:57:26+00:00): Du mapst leider viele Dinge aus alten IGN-Karten und IGN-Luftbildern heraus die es nicht mehr gibt. Diese Kläranlage z.B. existiert nicht mehr.
Das Luftbild von ESRI ist im Elsass aktueller.
giggls (2022-04-01 14:16:07+00:00): Unsere große Stärke in OSM ist es dass wir Menschen mit Vor-Ort Kenntnissen haben. Wenn man diese nicht hat sollte man nur sehr vorsichtig neue Dinge mappen oder gar alte löschen.
Interteutones (2022-04-01 16:12:21+00:00): Ja giggls da hast du natürlich recht. Aber vielleicht sollte man den hier unentgeltlich Tätigen und die Datenbank füllenden Mitarbeitern auch gescheites Werkzeug in Form von aktuellen und guten Karten zur Verfügung stellen? Das würde viele Fehler und Doppelarbeit vermeiden. Das derzeitige (Karten-) Handwerkszeug ist meiner Meinung nach recht bescheiden.
GeoBoris (2022-04-01 21:06:13+00:00): Naja... in OSM sind wie alle die unentgeltlichen Mitarbeiter. Manche mappen "nur" unentgeltlich für die Karte. Andere, so wie giggls mappen, betreuen die Server für uns alle, erstellen Kartenstyles für uns alle, erstellen Karten usw. ...ebenfalls unentgeltlich - als Hobby. Auch die ganzen Editoren, egal ob jetzt der Web-Editor oder JOSM, ist mal von einem OSM'ler unentgeltlich programmiert worden um das Projekt voran zu bringen. Anderen Freiwilligen haben in langen "Kämpfen" und Bittstellungen bei Firmen und Behörden Geodaten erbettelt, anhand denen wir alle die Karte verbessern können.
Wenn Du also eine Quelle hast, die bessere Werkzeuge und Karten zur Verfügung stellen kann, immer her damit! Bzw. selber machen.
Ansonsten gibt es schon so viele Werkzeuge und Karten die Du noch gar nicht nutzt und kennst, das der Ball hier erstmal bei Dir liegt Dich weiter einzuarbeiten. Wie gesagt würden JOSM als Editor Dir (und uns) schonmal sehr viel helfen, dass Du die zur verfügung stehenden Grundkarten gescheit sehen und nutzen kannst.
Das gescheite Werkzeug und Karten gibt es also zuhauf, lerne es kennen!
Ansonsten machst Du dir momentan selber die Doppelarbeit, das solltest Du nicht dem OSM-Projekt vorwerfen. Warum editierst Du zuhauf bereits bestehende Gebäudegrundrisse anstatt nur neue und abgerissene zu erfassen? Ansonsten gibt es genügend Objektklassen die man noch zuhauf eintragen kann (was Du mit den Hecken, Einfahrten, etc. ja durchaus machst).
Farfetch'd (2022-03-27 21:10:55+00:00): Nagle zostałeś znawcą terenów Lipna? Niezły przeskok z Lubelskich Piask...
user_14117678 (2022-03-27 21:12:53+00:00): Samochód. Słyszałeś kiedyś o takim wynalazku?
Farfetch'd (2022-03-27 21:27:50+00:00): Dziwnie, że zawsze "jeździsz" od szkoły do szkoły. Jest to bardzo niepokojące zachowanie.
eggie (2022-03-27 21:06:58+00:00): Hi Günter.. Better tag access=private.. for private roads.
Greetz,
eggie
user_5359 (2022-03-28 13:07:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044573634 (one of twenty one). What is the meaning of the tag CAT2OSMSHAPEID-1 = CONSTRUUR14865?
Sercontr (2022-03-28 13:31:05+00:00): Hi, those tags not valid. I made a new update deleting them.
thanks for the warning
user_5359 (2022-03-30 10:04:32+00:00): The key CAT2OSMSHAPEID-1 is removed.
GeoBoris (2022-03-27 22:02:33+00:00): Bitte die korrekte nach Katasterplan gezeichneten Gebäude nicht mittels Luftbild "nachmalen"....
GeoBoris (2022-03-27 21:26:01+00:00): Grundrisse der Gebäude bitte anhand der Kataster-Karte (Catastre) bearbeiten. Eingetragene Grundrisse anhand von Luftbild leider sehr fehlerhaft
Niiepce (2022-05-13 15:37:51+00:00): Hallo Matthias,
dieser Changeset umfasst viele unterschiedliche Änderung und bearbeitet anscheinend warnings (ich kenne mich nicht mit dem Editor iD aus). Vielleicht wäre hier als Kommentar zum Änderungssatz eine etwas ausführlichere Beschreibung hilfreich gewesen oder das Aufteilen in mehrere kleinere Änderungssätze hätte ggf. auch geholfen.
Insgesamt habe ich sehr viele gute Änderungen gesehen, jedoch bin ich auch auf einige merkwürdige Änderungen gestoßen.
An mehreren Stellen an denen die Straßenbahn Richtung Sanderau andere Wege kreuzt wurden diese als Tunnel oder Brücken getaggt. Der Sinn dieser Änderungen ist mir nicht ganz klar, da vor Ort diese Brücken oder Tunnel nicht vorzufinden sind. Deshalb mehrere Fragen/ Bitten:
1. Bei welchen der Änderungen hast du vor Ort dir die Situationen angesehen?
2. Haben die von mir beschrieben Änderungen irgendeinen bestimmten Sinn, den ich nicht verstehe, oder handelt es sich hier um so eine Art "Tagging für den Renderer" oder "Tagging für die warnings"?
3. Falls die Änderungen fehlerhaft waren, könntest du diese dann rückgängig machen/ beheben und überlegen, ob Fehler solcher Art dir noch an anderer Stelle passiert sind?
Vielen Dank im Voraus
Niiepce
krusefahrer (2022-03-27 22:08:13+00:00): If you are not following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct your edit certainly will be reverted.
hoserab (2022-12-22 19:29:18+00:00): FYI you erroneously deleted hole names from the River Spirit Golf Club outside Calgary, Alta. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/51.0366/-114.3791). Please be careful with these sorts of automated edits and don't just assume if a golf hole is named that the name is in error. In the case of River Spirit the holes were already tagged with "ref=#" and you effectively just deleted the names, which is confusing because there are three sets of nine-hole courses that are played in different combinations for a full 18-hole round. Someone playing this course needs to know the *name* of the hole they're on, not just the number, because they'll be playing the 1st hole on one course as the 10th hole on their back nine...
heretofore (2023-04-20 13:45:48+00:00): I had golf holes that had both ref AND name, and you wiped the name, even though it wasn't just a number. That was kind of annoying.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-20 21:30:53+00:00): Can you link them?
heretofore (2023-04-20 21:35:34+00:00): I made them separate sport site relations instead of North/South names. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135152782
porfiriopaiz (2022-03-27 22:25:45+00:00): Hello,

Is this a cemetery/grave yard or a store that provides funeral related services?

Please map it accordingly.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-17 07:14:25+00:00): I am now trying to track down missed maxpeed:type with https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dPQ
Chincha1 (2022-05-14 12:17:44+00:00): ??????????????
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118997831
janolezab (2022-05-14 13:50:06+00:00): Hello Chinha1, if you have a problem with adding a wikidata tag to a street, you may have to articulate where it lies.
Mordechai23 (2022-04-01 12:06:48+00:00): Oczywiście że jest - tych chodników i ddr nie oddzielają żadne bariery. Jest też chodnik który zrevertowałeś, nie ma zdublowanego przejścia pieszo-rowerowego na Piłsudskiego
Mordechai23 (2022-04-01 12:13:36+00:00): takie rysowanie utrudnia nawigację rowerową
JuanjoMC (2022-03-28 09:58:09+00:00): Hi,

this building is under construction, you asjusted its shape as per the industrial building that was there before (see 2019 aerial imagery) and has been demolished.

It was already marked as demolished but I deleted it a week ago or so because another user added the new one under construction.

The other small building, at the back, that you added in the other changeset has been demolished too.

Cheers.
bxl-forever (2022-03-28 16:37:05+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for spotting this, and apologies for the mistake.

I wanted to trust note #3106677 here that announced the building could be traced, but that was a mistake, then.  (That user is definitely not reliable. 🙄)

I restored the former structure and added a fixme tag, so that we know we’ll have to check it later, and I also put a demolished:* prefix on the other building at the back, that way no-one else will add it by mistake.
JuanjoMC (2022-03-28 16:56:12+00:00): I see the note now, it migt be that the user is right and the construction is finished. It has been a while since I visited the area.

In any case, what is currently displayed in Urbis is the old (demolished) building
Fabrizio Tatti (2022-12-07 10:11:33+00:00): La cascata di is Arinus c'è già. Se ci sono più di un salto lungo il fiume possono essere lasciati senza nome.
Lupinsun (2022-12-07 10:24:10+00:00): Ok, buono a sapersi.. si possono anche magari numerare tipo "1° salto..." "2° salto..." etc etc?
Fabrizio Tatti (2022-12-08 08:33:14+00:00): Il tag "name" è per indicare il nome comune usato per un elemento. Se nel mondo reale non ha un nome è meglio lasciarlo senza.
Ergo se la gente non chiama comunemente un posto "primo salto" è meglio non forzare la nomenclatura.
Langlaeufer (2022-03-31 21:52:32+00:00): Hallo Mark, einige der Angaben sind überflüssig: Die Standardwerte von path sind bicycle=yes, foot=yes, horse=yes und motor_vehicle=no.
Surface ist aber hilfreich ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118998223
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-28 11:58:25+00:00): Porque deletou algumas ruas que foram desenhadas aqui por outras pessoas?
Carneiro98BR (2022-03-29 01:00:30+00:00): Poxa.. obrigado por desfazer meu trabalho..! como disse sou morador da área e estou apenas contribuindo com as informações que tenho e sei que estão certas.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-29 01:02:55+00:00): Se tiver como provar que está certo fazer o que você fez, excluir diversas ruas que são visíveis inclusive em imagens de satélite desta semana no site sentinel eu posso reverter a alteração em que desfiz tudo que você fez. Do contrário você está errado sim.
Carneiro98BR (2022-03-29 02:21:23+00:00): É só vir presencial na área ue... e verá que estou certo. Mas tudo bem, vou lhe dar exemplos e provas que você pode consultar pelos correios por exemplo.. os cep's e nomes das ruas que coloquei. Ex.: 54522-660 / 54522-600 / 54522-595 / 54522-560 / 54522-530 / 54522-525 / 54522-535 ... outros  2 detalhes, o certo é Itapuama com ''u'' e não ''o'' e tem sua origem do tupi-guarani e significa ''pedra bonita'' e a ''PE''
Carneiro98BR (2022-03-29 02:23:03+00:00): ... que passa na área é a 024 e não a 009 que é outra ''PE'' ''pedagiada'' na região
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-29 03:51:21+00:00): Eu não preciso ir até a área pra ver que elas existe. Eu estou vendo na imagem de satélite desta semana. Se não tem cep ou não são "oficiais" não tira a existência em solo das mesmas. Se algum nome está errado você pode mudar, eu fiz a reversão porque você estava deletando várias coisas que existem em solo. Enquanto estiver deixando o que existe em solo no mapa nada seu será revertido. Boa noite. Obrigado.
FJili (2022-03-28 02:25:13+00:00): 您好，我认为经开区与高新区的地名应标注为日照经开区与日照高新区，
official_name为日照经济技术开发区与日照高新技术产业开发区，
管委会应标注于管委会该建筑物的上方
marczoutendijk (2022-03-30 08:37:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5859

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
622991 (2022-04-07 07:51:07+00:00): I agree with that
marczoutendijk (2022-04-07 09:07:23+00:00): So please answer the question from FJili.
所以请回答FJili的问题。
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-28 12:11:16+00:00): bom dias, tive que reverter todas suas edições, pois foram bem destrutivas na área que editou. se quiser colaborar com o mapa, por favor, tenha mais cuidado, só delete e modifique algo quando tiver certeza. se alguma via é privada deve ser marcada como tal e não deletada.
marczoutendijk (2022-03-28 09:27:57+00:00): Hi TaxusB,
You don't understand the way tags are to be used, as now all of your changes are invalid!
It should be:
highway=path
access=private
And never use a name=* to describe other properties. 
I have changed your edits accordingly.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119012449

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
ElliottPlack (2022-03-31 02:27:23+00:00): Unrelated to our discussion on the university tag, I took a class at Loyola back when I was at TU and I recall we were not allowed to drive onto the Evergreen campus, certainly cars were not as it is gated. Is that not the case any more? (I saw you had removed the motor_vehicle=private tag). I tagged that this way because regular access=private would block peds and I think they don't mind folks walking around in there, just as JHU is an open campus.
pkoby (2022-03-31 02:39:19+00:00): I didn't see any signage at the gate against entry for peds. It does say bicyclists should dismount (which is silly if cars can drive...). I figured motor_vehicle=private is incorrect if customers are allowed, so I guess that ought to be =destination or =customers.

Also, the website for the museum says no one should wander the grounds without paying for entry, but that's not clear from the street.
ElliottPlack (2022-04-01 15:06:37+00:00): Peter, thanks for this observation. destination or customers is a better fit. (Dating myself here) last time I was there it was not an active museum, it was just closed to the public all the time. No further objections from me here.
nevw (2022-03-28 09:10:56+00:00): I assume this is the office for the named business and have altered the tags.
Warin61 (2022-03-31 09:05:22+00:00): The building tag "building=" usually has certain values such as "building=yes" or "building=church". "building=Perth Mini Excavator" make little sense. 

For a better explanation see the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
nevw (2022-03-28 09:17:55+00:00): Your depiction of the sports Field bears little resemblance to satellite imagery.
The previous mapper have and oval/circle shape around each of the pitches which seems closer to reality. Another bounded by all the grassed area maybe a reasonable addition.
QC3 Construction (2022-03-30 07:14:53+00:00): Satalite image is old and i know the place very well.
nevw (2022-03-30 07:34:10+00:00): Hi
that’s for replying.
Local knowledge is best so your mapping is valued highly. The latest satellite imagery is likely to be Maxar and you can switch to use it in iD. It is of lower resolution though so often switching between Bing and Maxar works well.
Warin61 (2022-03-30 11:09:58+00:00): The cricket playing area now has no resemblance to the official cricket area ... must be some new form of cricket? 

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cricket_field_parts.svg

"A circular cricket field is considered as the perfect field but generally a cricket pitch is slightly oval. Its diameter varies between 137m and 150m." See https://www.dlgsc.wa.gov.au/sport-and-recreation/sports-dimensions-guide/cricket
Warin61 (2022-03-31 07:12:08+00:00): Should I remap back to a circle, or will you  QC3 Construction?
Warin61 (2022-04-15 07:51:50+00:00): Re set the single cricket pitch back to a circle - used bing. Maxar is usually the latest imagery OSM has available now, that simply shows grass .. possibly out of cricket season.
QC3 Construction (2024-09-05 07:18:05+00:00): not a cricket pitch mate
Warin61 (2024-09-05 08:21:23+00:00): Bing still shows a cricket pitch .. other imagery shows nothing. 
2 years ago the change you made still had a cricket pitch here. As we are coming out of winter perhaps St Marks Anglican Community School will once again have a cricket pitch here... assuming it has not been made into something else?
nevw (2022-03-28 09:08:28+00:00): Hi
you have mapped Better Pets and Gardens on top of the Bunnings warehouse. This seems unlikely. What is the true situation with the shops here?
nevw (2022-03-29 06:38:12+00:00): This is no longer a Bunnings building, have remapped
Kovoschiz (2022-03-28 02:07:51+00:00): /changeset/118992047,118451534,118684890,118452331
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-30 21:37:20+00:00): Why are you adding fake ponds?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-28 11:56:00+00:00): Bom dia, vi que você fez a seguinte modificação na cidade de Uauá, mas pelas imagens o que você inseriu não parece condizer com a realidade. No OSM pretendemos deixar no mapa o que está na realidade, não o que deverá ser no futuro baseado em projetos.
kurisubrooks (2022-03-28 04:58:02+00:00): Hi Lucy, thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMaps. I've done some investigation and can't see any reason why this road wouldn't appear on your navigation system -- so the most likely issue would be that the data on your navigation system isn't up to date. The service road in question was added 9 months ago so it should be rolled out to most devices. Is there anywhere in whatever app you're using that you can find where you can update the OSM data? It might not update automatically and may need to be done manually. Please get back to me as i'd love to solve this issue for you. I've also gone ahead and made some changes and fixes of the service road and driveways you added in your changeset, those are reflected in changeset 119002983. Kind regards, Chris.
LucyCee (2022-03-28 05:19:09+00:00): Thank you so much for helping. And for fixing things for me. 

I believe the local council may have added the road nine months ago after requesting something be done but they told me they only changed Google maps so idk. 

I use Google maps and it works for that but I had a medical emergency at my house and six vehicles from three different emergency services all had issues with access. Their mapping system took them to 54 GWH rather than the service road via Wyoming Ave. Their is no access to 54 or 56 GWH via the Highway, only via the service road at the end of Wyoming Ave. 

I have been told by BMCC that there is no central place for mapping where GPS systems get their data but I found that hard to believe. 

Is OSM where GPS systems get their data?