piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-07-11 10:16:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).

D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.

E: Rectangular buildings, not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122758704
Syl (2024-02-18 09:44:35+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé la suppression des piscines.
Si elles existent toujours il n'y a pas de raison de les supprimer, même si elles sont privées.
RedAuburn (2024-03-31 21:46:27+00:00): According to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4061087, all Santander cycle stations have been removed, is this relation/the docks still valid?
rubberduck9999 (2022-07-20 08:38:45+00:00): Sieht alles in Ordnung aus, außer einer Kleinigkeit, dass sich 2 Pfade ohne Punkt gekreuzt haben
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122759318
kolasau (2022-06-23 12:59:00+00:00): #mapbox_linters_brazil
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122759330
LockOnGuy (2022-06-23 21:05:50+00:00): Hello Aleksandar1994, please, can you use the naming method we the local mappers agreed to use in Iraq next time?     
The naming would be like XXX-YY
XXX is محلة, YY is زقاق. This format is the approved one by the community, and is used in all cities where the names were added, like Erbil, Baghdad, Sulaymaniyah, and Next month all of Mosul (I hope if I got time)     
If you have street name data, please share it so I can help add them all. Thanks
Aleksandar1994 (2022-06-24 07:04:52+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy! Thank you very much for sharing this information, I will keep it in mind next time when adding street names in Iraq. I would also like to thank you for making the neccesary changes. 
Please note that I don't have street names in the region of Iraq, these are contributions from Map builder users, so we manualy add changes if we do not recognise any malicius behavior. 
Best regards
LockOnGuy (2022-06-24 13:56:29+00:00): Hello Aleksandar1994, Thank you for your amazing edits in Iraq, it is okay if you add it as is, no problem, I can fix it later as I will add all of Mousl and all of Baghdad in the next weeks no worry, thank you so much again and keep up the great work my friend!
marc__marc (2024-08-15 13:25:00+00:00): Hello,
Did you really mean to say that this pool has been under construction for 20 years?
If so, it's not yet a swimming pool and the date it was finished is not 1916... and if it's protected as a heritage building, I don't think it's really even under construction any more, it's more like it's been abandoned.=yes (in the osm meaning of the tag : not operational without works)
check_date:operational_status is also uncommon (only 1 use here), operational_status:date is more common
Regards,
Marc
Sinuhe20 (2024-08-15 16:42:46+00:00): Hello, I don't know what I've committed, but it was finished 1926 according to https://ns.gis-bldam-brandenburg.de/hida4web/view?docId=obj09175668.xml  Now it's a marina park (https://marinapark-eberswalde.de/drausicht/) , at the time of my commit it was under construction I think, but now it seems to be finished.
user_5359 (2022-06-26 06:00:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1072679715. What is the meaning of the tag
roof:o = a
?
jengelh (2022-06-26 08:30:43+00:00): I'm too fast for JOSM's autocompletion. Fixed the building.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-27 07:37:51+00:00): shop=proposed is better avoided, as many data consumer will interpret it as shop if a rare type

I removed it
JeroenHoek (2022-06-24 10:38:37+00:00): Was dit je bedoeling? Je legt hem juist scheef:

https://postimg.cc/hfq6pcNB
JeroenHoek (2022-06-24 10:41:00+00:00): Zo lag hij:

https://postimg.cc/mcQ8cH21

Dat klopt, want de eenrichtingsweg komt grofweg uit op de rechterhelft van de (tweerichtings)straat.
dvdhoven (2022-06-25 14:28:27+00:00): changeset reverted
rufioxxx (2022-06-26 10:34:25+00:00): Bankomat Bank Spółdzielczy
literan (2022-06-23 17:25:52+00:00): только не addr:place (это тег для нумерации по населенному пункту, как в деревнях где нет улиц), а addr:street.
Исправлю.
rskedgell (2023-12-27 13:49:20+00:00): More cycle lane tags added without checking the available imagery.
MaGIStokrat (2022-06-30 18:08:39+00:00): fragwürdige Änderung der Straßenklassen, siehe:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122973894
yasslay (2022-06-23 14:10:04+00:00): Oh no, did I do something else on mistake? The changeset is larger than it should be...
foreigner037 (2022-06-23 15:49:19+00:00): Здравейте,

питам Ви отново, откъде взимате информацията? Ако не получа отговор от Вас, ще съм принуден да ви докладвам за вандализъм.
MxxCon (2022-06-24 02:13:30+00:00): There are no tags for wikimedia, but you are welcome to link to the correct wikidata Q reference number as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata

When linking to wikipedia articles it should be just  "wikipedia=language:page title", not the whole https:// url. I fixed it up for you. 👍🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122762526
Wallenstein55 (2022-06-23 14:38:48+00:00): Dieser Weg muss gelöscht werden.
Habe irrtümlich an einem Bach angefangen und bekomme den Fehler nicht korrigiert. Danke.
de Veis (2022-06-23 16:19:48+00:00): Hallo Wallenstein55, hab das mal in Änderungssatz 122766493 erledigt und den vorhandenen Pfad mit der Straße verbunden.
LockOnGuy (2022-06-23 21:17:10+00:00): Hello iriman, What is the source for node 9841693861 that you added in this changeset?     
I'm pretty sure there is no "supermarket" in this street base on local knowledge of the area, there might be couple small shops but not a supermarket.     
Regards.
iriman (2022-06-24 10:47:00+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy,
It is based on a photo from that place for a week ago. It was closed in the photo and I wasn't sure about choosing convenience shop or supermarket shop.
https://i.postimg.cc/W4VRrQHS/aswaq.jpg
LockOnGuy (2022-06-24 10:53:43+00:00): Hello iriman,
In the photo it says “اسواق" which mean a small convenience store not سوبرماركت supermarket.  
what is the source of this photo?
iriman (2022-06-24 12:36:05+00:00): Thanks for the info. If you confirm I'll change it to convenience shop. 

Do people there use the word سوبرماركت just for large supermarkets that they usually need trolleys for shopping or it is common for small stores?

Source of the photo is this video:
https://youtu.be/cqQSSk3WQeY?t=409
LockOnGuy (2022-06-24 13:21:11+00:00): Hello iriman, the tag should be for the node "shop=grocery" not a supermarket. since it's a very small shop and the name clearly says "اسواق" which is like a small grocery shop.                  
There might be grocery stores that have a sign that says "سوبرماركت" these stores should be added as grocery stores, not a supermarket but add the name as is in the name tag, for example, https://i.ibb.co/1rQWqrr/Example.jpg                
I don't know if you guys are familiar with supermarkets in Iran but a supermarket, in general, is like a regular store but usually Big in size and has everything in the food sections like Bato or Cozmo supermarkets around Baghdad, when it gets bigger it would be called hypermarkets like ABC hypermarkets which you can buy household items and home appliances, anything smaller than the supermarket it should be tagged as convention store or grocery store.                  
Lastly, I asked about the source because I thought you're source was google maps since it was also mapped wrong there as a "supermarket" and google maps is not an acceptable source here in OSM, not sure about YouTube though.      
Best Regards and keep up the good work!
LockOnGuy (2022-06-24 13:33:36+00:00): *your source.
iriman (2022-06-24 21:47:34+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy,
Okay, I'll use grocery for it. Thanks for your assistance.
In Iran سوپرمارکت is also a term that people mostly use for smaller shops. Even sometimes هایپرمارکت.
Larger shops usually have Farsi term فروشگاه in their name (however it's not always true to think about as a rule in naming).
As an example Refah is one of the oldest chain stores in Iran. Of course there are some others too. Add to them some factories or companies that have supermarkets or hypermarkets that primarily focus to give service to their employees with fewer branches limited to a city or town and not country-wide.
Thanks
Robert Whittaker (2022-07-25 12:46:39+00:00): In this changeset it looks like you've updated the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316688348 from "Currys PC World" to "Currys", and the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26503665 from "PC World" to "Currys".

It would seem odd for there to be two Currys stores this close together. So is this change just based on a survey or local knowledge, or was it just based on the existing tagged names that we know are no longer in use?

I'm asking because there are Mapillary images from July 2020 that show the second of the above buildings as being a Dunelm store at that time: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=51.521835899972&lng=0.071302&pKey=957643231749948&focus=photo .

Do you have any more recent knowledge, or would updating the second "Currys" to "Dunelm" be the best option here, based on the available information?
GinaroZ (2022-07-27 13:35:35+00:00): I've changed this from a highway=raceway, as that tag is for motorised tracks https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684027198
tms13 (2022-07-27 21:13:22+00:00): Ah, yes, that's more appropriate.  Thanks for improving that.
user_5359 (2022-06-24 10:22:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9841729895. What is the meaning of the tag Kuburan = Bumi Asri?
khdhzhpmaxwccappzg (2022-06-26 07:36:41+00:00): Hello,
Your changesets show that you are using Bing imagery, but the changes you are making don't seem to be evident from imagery. If you have local knowledge of the area, could you list that as a source from now on?
Claudio Tam (2022-06-27 09:18:05+00:00): Ciao Fred73000!
Con type=boundary e type=multipolygon facevo riferimento ai 116 membri della relazione e non alla relazione. Per la relazione, type=collection mi sembra perfetto.
Ho inserito una proposta di tagging di tutti i 116 membri della relazione qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Rome ma per ora non si è fatto vivo nessuno.
user_8101879 (2022-06-28 18:17:59+00:00): I think it is great to use tags that everybody uses (tags you can find in the wiki).

In my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122764434
I put for all type=boundary + boundary=place according to the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dplace

I don't think you need more because boundary = place is clearly defined : it is an area with a specific name, what you call "divisioni toponomastiche", so it is exactly, I think, what you want.

So I will not use alt_place:it, alt_place, note:it, official_place:it, official_place because not used + no wiki page and useless according to the wiki page for boundary=place.

Best regards
ivanbranco (2022-06-28 18:49:05+00:00): I post here since a conversation already started: I don't think this relation has much sense: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14281406/history

Relations are not categories: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

Otherwise we could create relations such "City boundaries of Lazio" ecc.ecc.
ivanbranco (2022-06-28 18:51:25+00:00): If someone needs this data they can just do a query for boundaries inside the admin_level=8 Rome boundary.
Claudio Tam (2022-06-29 09:01:33+00:00): ivanbranco that's not correct; there are a lot of non-adm "places", with a lot of different types. "distretti toponomastici" is a very specific and well defined non-adm type. There are other non-adm types such as "Zone O", "PDZ", "Aree urbane", and many more.
Among all these non-adm types, "distretti toponomastici" is probably the most important one in Rome, and it's worth tagging it differently from "Zone O", "PDZ", "Aree urbane", making it searchable without confusion.
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 19:52:25+00:00): according to taginfo, there is a lot of different "places" https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/place#values = currently 867 values.

For me there is no problem to tag :
* type=boundary
* boundary = place
* place = zone O or PDZ or Aree urbane or what you want (but, if possible, use english words : suburbio/rione/quartiere/zona are, in english, according to googgle+bing translators, suburb / ward / neighborhood / area. And all these words are still in taginfo
dieterdreist (2022-12-12 18:27:40+00:00): there are different place values, yes, but there are also different toponomastic divisions, you seem to have collected some of them in a relation. I agree with Ivan, these relations are heavy on data consumers and are just a collection of what can be mapped with tags, hence should be removed. Do not use relations for what can be mapped with tags, this is a basic rule to avoid heavy structures.
MxxCon (2022-06-24 02:17:23+00:00): Hello.
You added a footway here with "layer=-1" implying that it is underground. Is that correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122764046
jmilot (2022-06-27 13:59:10+00:00): Hello,

Yes, it is. The node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/297112172 to which it's attached is a subway entrance, i.e. a stairs going down. I believe it to be correctly tagger as underground, and, also, different from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634012794.
letsridebikes (2022-09-05 17:31:29+00:00): Hello! Thank you for mapping so many houses around Wotton!
I think you may have got the addr:city tag wrong, though - it refers to the post town, not the nearest major city; for example these should be 20 Dryleaze, Wotton-under-Edge, GL12 not 20 Dryleaze, Bristol, GL12. Bristol isn't part of a rural Gloucestershire address.
See here for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:city
Thanks again this is a fantastic edit to Wotton, I had no hope of completing all these houses! I will go ahead and correct the addr:city tags within the boundaries of the town
GrooveBox (2022-09-06 07:48:21+00:00): You are correct. I'll attempt to use overpass-turbo to find all the erroneous ones. and oorrect them
letsridebikes (2022-09-06 08:23:20+00:00): Not to worry, I already did! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125825045 Wotton is small enough JOSM could take care of it in one go. Thanks again!
Romwriter (2022-06-26 07:05:49+00:00): Was soll das? Mit "Spiky Buildings" (https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/27779) hat dieser Änderungssatz inhaltlich nichts zu tun.
Carrera075 (2022-06-23 15:48:50+00:00): I forgot to clarify, the edits were mostly to Leslie Middle School, which I used to go to (but since that was so long ago, I relied more on the imagery instead of memory), but I also added detail to the Morrow Co. HQ, and I added the name of Mission Lake.
ivanbranco (2022-07-04 17:01:31+00:00): Ciao Canfe,

c'è qualcosa che non va con questo nodo:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/228137284

nome e brand:wikipedia/wikidata fanno riferimento a Esso, mentre il tag brand a Q8.

inoltre il ref:mise univoco appartiene ad un altro benzinaio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/228137512/
canfe (2022-07-07 17:35:18+00:00): Alla fine mi son stufato e ho revertato tutto. Mi sa che OSMAND con il suo import delle pompe di benzina non funzioni più così bene come una volta.
Gonéo (2022-06-23 16:14:20+00:00): Plutôt que supprimer, il est conseillé de le passer en shop=vacant et éventuellement utiliser le tag old_name=*. Ceci permet de garder l’historique du lieu.

Ça évite aussi que quelqu’un le rajoute à partir d’un jeu de données pas à jour.

Je propose de faire un revert sur ta modification pour restaurer l'historique puis de passer le shop en vacant.
Zekovski (2022-06-23 16:19:21+00:00): Je viens de regarder le wiki et effectivement, ça a l'air complexe de ressusciter un point. :/
Je veux bien que tu t'en occupes si ça ne t'ennuie pas. Je tâcherai de me souvenir de cette erreur.
Gonéo (2022-06-23 16:26:09+00:00): C'est fait. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4682107691
pbnoxious (2022-06-23 20:31:20+00:00): Danke fürs schnelle ändern, ich will übrigens nichts böses falls ich etwas schroff rüber kam. Schau nur ab und an mal über die letzten Änderungen im Raum zwischen Nürnberg und Wiesent und lass Kommentare da, wenn ich was sehe :)
TheStrat (2022-06-24 08:29:05+00:00): Alles gut. Dann lern ich's vielleicht auch irgendwann mal "richtig" :-)
alefebvre37 (2022-07-11 10:16:03+00:00): bonjour,

je débute avec OSM, comment valider les informations modifiées ?
merci
SHARCRASH (2022-06-23 23:08:35+00:00): Hi! About this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071345207 you've changed from track to unclassified, was the sign forbidding normal traffic removed on the N side? If not it should stay as track grade1
SHARCRASH (2022-06-23 23:10:35+00:00): And the track you've changed as cycleway, if agricultural still use it to access the fields, it should also stay as track + bicycle designated
strasz-li (2022-06-28 20:44:46+00:00): Hi! Thanks for comm.
1) A sign on the S side explicitly allows normal traffic, but gives priority to agricultural machines (French road signs are sometimes bizarre, I might take a photo if you're interested).
2) I did not find the sign you mention (forbidding normal traffic on the N side), but I might have simply missed it (it would be inconsistent with S side though) - I'll look for it next time I pass.
3) "track + bicycle designated" was my idea when I first edited stuff in the Canner valley, but then I paid more attention to some of the signs and it looks like this road is accessible to normal traffic as well (inhabitants of the Griesberg farm perhaps?).
SHARCRASH (2022-07-01 11:33:51+00:00): Hi! Sorry for the late reply.
Hmm? How would there be a road sign on the S side explicitly allowing normal traffic, even giving priority to agricultural if there is no road for normal traffic at all. There are tracks W + E and the cycleway coming from Elzange. Unless that way should be an unclassified road too? It is weird, no?
strasz-li (2022-07-02 15:47:38+00:00): Hi! 
I just checked today: there is the same sign on the N side as on the S side.

What do you mean by "no road for normal traffic"? That road is for: normal traffic, bicycles, agricultural vehicles. It's physically fit for those and marked by the signs.

W is a track, E leads to the farm, and S towards Elzange is a cycles + pedestrians path.
SHARCRASH (2022-07-02 16:01:08+00:00): You said there is a road sign explicitly allowing normal traffic on the S side of that highway but from that S side there is no road for normal traffic (for motorcars, trucks, motorcycles, etc... which can ride on highways such as unclassified, residential, tertiary etc ). As OSM's Wiki says "tracks... are not considered part of the general-purpose road network". On that S side we only have 2 tracks (does not allow normal traffic usually), and a cycleway only for cyclists. So how can there be such a sign ? Or as i said previously, the highway coming from Elzange should be unclassified.
SHARCRASH (2022-07-02 16:02:32+00:00): Which sign on both sides? B0 ?
SHARCRASH (2022-07-02 16:39:16+00:00): Vous pouvez communiquer en français avec moi, au cas où.
strasz-li (2022-07-02 19:59:00+00:00): Merci, mais il m'est plus facile d'écrire en anglais.

Please be considerate:
1.1. The questions you're asking ("How can there be such a sign?") are either extremely vague or purely rhetoric. I can't meaningfully answer such a question, but I can send you a photo of the sign, should you accept this as a proof of its existence.
1.2. That you think it shouldn't be there doesn't mean it's not there. I map what I see.

Let me try to answer your doubts:
2.1. I don't know its code, but it's not B0.
2.2. You seem to imply that a "normal traffic" road cannot take you to nowhere and then stop. This assumption is wrong (cf. signs C13a for example). /By the way, C13a is placed at Chemin de Mewinkel in Koenigsmacker, which fits the rest./ Nothing prevents the N road being with normal traffic and W, S, E being without it. Even if such an arrangement looks pointless.
2.3. And the arrangement itself does not have to be pointless. The E track is probably private and the owners might use N (public) to get there and then continue on E (private) to get to their farm, with their car. This is only my guess, hence I've NOT changed the status of E. And why not commute with the shorter link further east? No idea. (Reluctant neighbour? bad road? flooded bride?) And honestly, I'm not going to knock on their door and ask...

All the best,
WS
SHARCRASH (2022-07-03 19:28:06+00:00): OK if you didn't find the B0 (red circle on white disc) on the N end, the situation changed apparently. Thanks for all the information!

I'm just trying to understand the situation. As you said, I'm asking you questions, so I am being considerate I think. I had doubts because as I explained there used to be the B0 sign and there are no highways for normal traffic coming from S (according the map). I agree that a minor highway for normal traffic can have a dead end but usually it's because it leads to residences, a parking, a picnic site, a point of interest, etc... Here I don't see anything as far as I've known before the new cycleway. I think we just misunderstood each other. As you said, "French road signs are sometimes bizarre".

Hmm, while I was writing you, I checked the access to the farmyard, the Cadastre seems suggesting there is a public access for "Chemin rural dit Eselsweg" from here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059304128 going around the farmyard on S then back to the NW to the crossway we were talking about (S of unclassified). Interesting! I will plot that.

Sorry for doubting but too many people don't know how to tag properly highways which have specific status. For example recently on this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106977603 I had warned the last two contributors (one beginner and even an experienced) how to deal with highways having the board C3 in BE, same as B0 in F. Few days later, on another changeset the beginner changed other highways. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123078979 They were unclassified for years, suddenly someone changed it to cycleway, someone else changed it back to unclassified, then the beginner changed it back to cycleway. I went yesterday to survey them to make it clear because I can see on the aerial photos that there are entrances to the fields. Turned out they are not full-fledged dedicated cycleways but tracks. The beginner didn't care about what I said... So I provided photos. I always try first to cooperate from contributor to contributor, but if they don't care, next time I won't be that gentle.

I still have doubts for the way you changed as cycleway because there used to be entrances to fields on that highway. ;) But I'm leaving it up to you, I don't live near that area.
Thanks again!