piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-02-22 11:50:02+00:00): Hier heb ik even de naam Grutto toegevoegd en ook gezorgd dat je linksaf kunt slaan de Oeverloper op.
Behalve dat we iedereen welkom heten kijken we ook even naar de eerste edits van een beginnende mapper.
mapse verder en vraag advies als je er niet uitkomt.
Kijk ook op het forum... Daar kun je jezelf ook voorstellen onder het kopje welkom. 
MVG, Eggie
GerritKoelewijn63 (2017-02-22 12:09:18+00:00): Als ik in het kleine vierkantje kijk zie ik nu weer dat het laatste stukje een normale weg is. Of komt dit omdat de kaart nog niet opnieuw gerenderd is?
eggie (2017-02-22 12:24:34+00:00): precies.. F5 wil wel eens helpen en keepright is wat sneller. Dan kun je na verloop van tijd de fouten eruit halen.
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?zoom=17&lat=52.23737&lon=5.36858&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
nammala (2017-02-23 04:23:13+00:00): Hi Jayadeva,

Welcome and Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the roads which exists in the Imagery. OpenStreetMap is the map of the world , the data added should be very valuable . Could you please confirm the deletion you have made.

Regards,
nammala
Jayadeva (2017-02-23 04:54:51+00:00): Hi nammala,
Thanks for your concern and it is good thing that some one observing the changes in small time compared to google. I'm happy to bring some more changes to openstreetmap. This deleted route is a only walk path and it is private and not permanent walk path. This field owner can modify this at any time. Hence I thought it is not good to miss lead others in this walk path. This is the reason I'm deleted. Guide me for this kind of routes in future I need leave or is there any option to show as restricted route so that I can make changes in that way

Regards,
Jayadeva
nammala (2017-02-23 05:23:30+00:00): Hi Jayadeva,

It is great that you got back , Since OpenStreetMap is a crowdsourced project and it is not great to delete other work without any proper reason and cause. So, as per your message it is still existing so it is not good to delete , instead you can add `access=private` tag as you are saying it is private (wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate). The way you contributing to OpenStreetMap is great. Looking forward to more contributions from you. For your information, I got back the changes you have made.

Let me know, if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
pnorman (2017-02-26 02:09:54+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
Geofreund1 (2017-05-05 11:49:56+00:00): The area:highway between Via San Biagio and Fiume Cinisco should be connected to another highway, otherwise routing will not work.
eggie (2017-02-22 11:41:41+00:00): Grutto nummer 9 heeft nu de adresgegevens op de woning zelf staan en ook nog op de BAG adresnode .

Dit is niet de bedoeling. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46302050
Die haal ik er even af.
bhousel (2017-02-22 13:51:58+00:00): Thank you for your contribution, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
user_5359 (2017-02-22 19:28:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space, parking_space is single slot for one car. Please use amenity=parking.
Supaplex (2017-04-06 19:23:32+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
nazgul5 (2017-02-22 12:51:08+00:00): Hi Jaimemd

What is the reason for splitting town into seperate areas https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4779733
?
jaimemd (2017-02-22 13:36:37+00:00): Hi nazgul5, I did'n want to split the town but the residential area. The relation I changed  both has landuse=residential and the town's name, not the administrative boundary. But the town is also represented by a node and the administrative boundary as a relation separate from the landuse information. This one I did not touch. Of course it is possible to reconnect the three parts where the impact of the railway area is low (in the western part). Otherwise I would delete the indeed wrong name of the residential areas. What du you prefer?
nazgul5 (2017-02-22 14:33:17+00:00): Ah, I see. By convention admin_level=9 can be ommited in Ukraine and be tagged just with place=*.
Better solution would be to remove landuse from this area and leave town borders intact. And slice town further with landuse areas.

You may leave it as is, I'll fix town border and landuse areas myself.

Good level of railway detalisation, tho. Thanks.
letihu (2017-03-08 11:10:33+00:00): Hier sind 4 Ampeln an gleicher Stelle gemappt worden. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4698948668/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4698948666/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4698948665/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2983172119/history#map=19/53.16952/8.19702
Das wäre mit JOSM nicht passiert.
Leider war auch diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23227609/history#map=18/53.17003/8.19842
nicht mehr an die Kreuzung gebunden.
letihu (2017-03-08 11:20:36+00:00): Hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380257504/history
ist der Weg auch nicht mit der Straße verbunden.
mavl (2017-10-10 16:28:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52796959 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46081077].
srividya_c (2017-03-24 10:33:45+00:00): Hi panoramedia,

Looks like you are deleting place names in name:en tag. Is there any reason to delete these English names? 

I have fixed few of these changes in #47120579 changeset. Can you please not delete English names until they are not correct. 

Thanks
panoramedia (2017-03-24 11:06:52+00:00): Hi srividya, 

If the name:en= tag only contains romanized Korean,  it is not English and therefore wrong. It is concensus on the wiki and the mailinglist. Please join the talk-ko mailinglist or the telegram group telegram.me/osmKorea to discuss with the community.
Cascafico (2017-02-22 13:48:41+00:00): Ciao Briz!

ho collegato il sentiero alle strade. Dai un'occhiata se può andare.
*briz* (2017-02-22 13:56:11+00:00): Ok!
mavl (2019-01-16 16:37:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Alexander-II (2017-02-22 12:09:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Добро пожаловать на openstreetmap. Вы указали, что на детской площадке есть wi-fi. На ней установлена общественная точка доступа? Или это означает, что до нее добивает чья-то домашняя wi-fi точка? Во втором случае правка неверна и будет сделан ее откат.
Cascafico (2017-02-22 13:47:56+00:00): ciao Briz e benvenuto in OSM!

ho sistemato l'edificio del comitato per Azzida.

Grazie per il contributo!
pnorman (2017-02-26 02:09:44+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-06-01 21:50:23+00:00): it is not advisable to add personally identifiable information to OpenStreetMap

Não é aconselhável adicionar informações de identificação pessoal ao OpenStreetMap
PT-53 (2017-02-22 11:51:34+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
achavi kann die Änderungen in diesem Änderungssatz wiederum nicht darstellen. Ich finde Dein Verhalten unkollegial!
Grüße
BeKri (2017-02-22 12:02:36+00:00): Servus PT-53,
darf ich fragen, was bitte daran unkollegial ist, dass achavi die Änderung nicht darstellen kann ?
MUSS ich Änderungen so halten, dass sie mit achavi darzustellen sind und WO steht das ?
achavi ist schön zur Darstellung aber sicherlich keine MUSS-Veranstaltung oder habe ich da irgendwas übersehen ?
Kollegiale Grüße derBeKri
BeKri (2017-02-22 12:11:11+00:00): Kleiner Nachtrag:
Du darfst mit gerne erklären, wie man die 1064 angemahnten "Fehler" bei Hauptstraße in https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/liste/street/H aufdröselt und anschließend SO hochlädt das achavi keine "Herzinfakt" gekommt.
Ähnlich es ist mit den lustigen Schreibweisen von Hauptstraße davor, die sich nun einmal über Deutschland verteilen.
So nebenbei: Ist schon bekannt, ab welchen Grenzen (Fläche oder Anzahl Objekte) achavi "Schluckauf" bekommt ?
Solange nicht mal das klar ist stellt sich die Frage wie das überhaupt zu begrenzen ist ...
Servus derBeKri
PT-53 (2017-02-22 12:20:17+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
auch ich berichtige täglich falsche Adressen. Ich mache das aber regional, je Ortschaft ein Änderungssatz.
Wenn Du 1064 Adressen auf einmal änderst und hochlädst, ist das nicht ein mechanischer Edit ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-02-22 12:27:42+00:00): In Bad Saulgau sind etliche Adressen falsch. Deine Berichtigungen der Schreibweise können davon nur einen unwesentlichen Teil erledigen.
Ich bin derzeit dabei, die Gebäude in Bad Saulgau zu überarbeiten und natürlich auch die Adressen zu ergänzen bzw. korrigieren. 
Siehe: 
http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=12&lat=48.10132&lon=9.65174&layers=BTT&age=1&user=!PT-53
Das ist sehr zeitaufwendig und dauert dementsprechend noch etwas.
BeKri (2017-02-22 17:28:57+00:00): Servus PT-53,
ich kann mich nicht erinnern, 1064 Adressänderungen hochladen zu wollen,
und selbst wenn wären sie von mir geprüft und kein mechanischer Edit.
Ob meine Berichtigungen nur einen unwesentlichen Teil erledigen ist mir ziemlich wurscht, solange sie nicht falsch sind. Ich halte es für SEHR wesentlich Fehler zu beheben, das tu ich.
Ist es denkbar, dass Du ein Problem hast, wenn "Fremde" ungefragt in Deiner Gegend editieren ?
Die von mir berichtigeten Fehler waren ja wohl so offentsichtlich, dass man sie schon locker hätte beheben können ;-)
szydzio (2018-06-11 10:02:08+00:00): Hi WJtW! While you added the tag passenger_lines=2 should the tag tracks not be reduced to 1 ? There are currently 70 fragment of railways in vicinity of Poznań which are mapped as parallel (separate) single-ways so the tag tracks=2 seems unnecessary, see=> https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/zuv for results. Let me know if I can correct it.
~Jhellico (2017-02-22 13:08:59+00:00): Навіщо мультиполігон для заказника? Там нема складної геометрії, просто полігон
eggie (2017-02-22 12:41:47+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

De camping stond al op de kaart. het campingsymbool heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden,
MVG, 
Eggie
Bibesh Gauli (2017-02-22 11:49:40+00:00): i mapped  some roads and some forests.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-16 16:03:04+00:00): What is the meaning of fire_hydrant:brand=Opet?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-16 16:04:10+00:00): Also - what was license of data used in this import?
SomeoneElse (2018-05-27 15:30:10+00:00): Hello 58zarali,
The data that you've imported here has a number of problems.  One is that the licence appears not to be compatible with OpenStreetMap (the Yellow Pages' site suggests data from it is "© 2016 - 2018 DataWorks").  Another is that you've added wikipedia and wikidata items pointing at the brand pages, not the individual item pages, which is incorrect.  Also "fire_hydrant:brand=Opet", as noted above, seems not to be a sensible tag.
Please answer these questions, either here or by email to OSM's Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSMs's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2018-05-27 15:30:43+00:00): Merhaba 58zarali,
Buraya aktardığınız verilerin birtakım sorunları var. Birincisi, lisansın OpenStreetMap ile uyumlu olmadığı görülüyor (Yellow Pages'ın sitesinden veriler "© 2016 - 2018 DataWorks"). Bir diğeri, yanlış olan tek tek ürün sayfalarını değil, marka sayfalarını işaret eden wikipedia ve wikidata öğelerini eklediniz. Ayrıca yukarıda belirtildiği gibi "fire_hydrant: brand = Opet", mantıklı bir etiket olarak görünmemektedir.
Lütfen bu soruları ya burada ya da OSM'nin Data@osmfoundation.org adresindeki Veri Çalışma Grubuna e-posta ile cevaplayınız.
Saygılarımla,
OSMs Veri Çalışma Grubu adına Andy Townsend.
katpatuka (2018-05-28 05:09:59+00:00): Opet şirekti için çalıştın mı? Opet benzin istasyonlarının datası ile alaklı bir email varsa o zaman OSM viki'de belgelemek lazım. (Örnek: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Katpatuka/CDC_email_traffic )
SomeoneElse (2018-05-29 17:32:41+00:00): @58zarali Please do answer the questions that other mappers are asking here.  If you don't we'll have to revert this (not least because of the very odd keys used).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSMs's Data Working Group.
58zarali (2018-05-29 19:06:50+00:00): Hi Andy,

I am a manager in the Digital Maps and Data Operations department at Yellow Pages Turkey.
Turkey Yellow Pages has the right to use the data. As a company we provide branded digital maps service. So we installed Opet gas stations on OpenstreetMap.
I agree, "fire_hydrant:brand" choice is wrong. I am sorry about that. My effort to use  more in Turkey for OpenStreetMaps.

Best
SomeoneElse (2018-06-05 22:29:58+00:00): Hi 58zarali,

(apologies for repeating some of what has previously been sent by email)

It's probably worth taking a step back and reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and the pages linked from there such as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines .  What I'd suggest that you do next is to follow the procedure described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Process , but when you email the imports list (see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports for how to subscribe to that) explain what's already happened and what data you have imported.

As you can see from reading those wiki links, there's more to importing data into OSM beyond just saying "we have permission" (there have already been questions asked about the tags used, such as the way that you've linked everything to the wikipedia page of the brand).  
Do you need any help with that?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2018-06-16 09:57:13+00:00): One other thing to mention - the wikipedia, wikidata and website used in each item here are incorrect.  For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4699023957 does _not_ have a wikipedia page (although the brand associated with the station does).  This is something else that you can discuss with the import list.
Best Regards,
Andy
58zarali (2018-06-22 11:16:11+00:00): Hi Andy,

Will the problem be solved by deleting "wikidata tr: Opet" tag from all locations?

Example Location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4699023952

Best,
Yusuf
SomeoneElse (2018-06-22 15:42:06+00:00): There's a bit more to it than that, as I said above - I'd actually suggest discussing it on the imports list.
58zarali (2018-06-22 18:31:46+00:00): If you can not make bulk edits, you can delete the entire list.
SomeoneElse (2018-06-30 10:22:36+00:00): I've removed the problematical key values in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60298600 (nodes) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60298840 (ways; there were no relations).  The changes were:
o Remove fire_hydrant:brand
o Change wikidata and wikipedia where set to brand:wikidata and brand:wikipedia.
I've left "website" as at least one other value has been used.
Some of the "name:tr" look odd too.
JOSM's validator found a number of issues which I have _not_ fixed - those need looking at by local mappers.
I'd still suggest discussing this on the imports list, even after the event, so that people are at least aware of it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-07-02 06:03:42+00:00): @SomeoneElse - thanks for the cleanup!
marc__marc (2024-08-23 00:15:24+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4466730291/history
you delete the main tag amenity=place_of_worship
what's this object describe ?
Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse (2017-02-22 21:54:15+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Edits that you make update the one shared map that everyone sees. That's why it's important that only valid edits are made to the map. If you want to experiment with the editors, you can do so over at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (an exact copy of the main site apart from the map display).
Best Regards,
Andy
Chris Fleming (2017-02-22 16:34:47+00:00): Hi Dan, I would just like to start by welcoming you to OpenStreetMap - from your comment, it sounds like this is a private road, therefore should it be tagged as private rather than deleted?

Thanks CHris
Dan Morton (2017-02-24 14:19:38+00:00): Hi Chris,

It's my private driveway that's shared with 2 of my neighbours, there's no reason for it to be mapped. No other driveways on the development are.

Thanks

Dan
Dan Morton (2017-02-24 14:21:50+00:00): Also neither Google or Bing map it.
Chris Fleming (2017-02-24 21:39:23+00:00): Thanks Dan - I will try and get over there and have a look. We try and be better than Google Maps.
drnoble (2017-02-25 11:20:52+00:00): I think I mapped this section originally, and at the time I didn't realise it was a private drive. As Chris says, we try and map the world as it exists on the ground, including access rights where these are known. It is quite easy to add that this is a private section.

I appreciate your concerns Dan with this being the only private drive mapped on the development. It would be great if you could contribute your local knowledge and help to map this area in more detail. There are other areas of Edinburgh which every driveway has been mapped (e.g. Oaklands Square in Brromhouse, https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.92782/-3.27572), and most of the central area now has every garden mapped, so I hope tis shows this is not targeting you specifically.
Dan Morton (2017-02-27 10:09:49+00:00): No worries, and on reflection there are pros to it being mapped and marked as private too....
Will try and update the map as the development is finished around us. I have some site layouts that could be scanned and over laid to help
nebulon42 (2017-03-03 19:50:41+00:00): Hi, hast du spezielle Hintergrundinfos, dass der nicht-öffentliche Teil der Reißeckbahn nicht mehr in Betrieb ist? Der Teil, den du als disused markiert hast wird nur für interne Zwecke genutzt und wird meines Wissens nach weiter betrieben. Es gäbe auch nicht viele andere Möglichkeiten Material und Leute zum Radlsee oder zum Hochalmsee zu bringen als mit der Dieseltraisine. Mit dem Hubschrauber vielleicht, für Inspektionen aber wohl zu aufwändig. Eine Anfrage von mir zu dem Thema an den Verbund blieb allerdings unbeantwortet.
Max-- (2017-03-03 23:39:50+00:00): Hab nochmal die Sachen durchgelesen, die ich dazu gefunden hatte und stimmt, wahrscheinlich ging es jeweils nur um den oeffentlichen vorderen Teil der Bahn, habe mich verwirren lassen durch die verschiedenen Bezeichnungen fuer "obere" und "untere" Bahn, je nach dem was man betrachtet (Bergbahn oder Schmalspurbahn). Ich habe den hinteren teil wieder in railway=narrow_gauge und usage=industrial geaendert, danke fuer deine Achtsamkeit und den Versuch, da an weiter informationen zu kommen.
nebulon42 (2017-03-04 10:52:50+00:00): Danke! Klar, da kann man leicht den Überblick verlieren. Es gibt ja sowohl den Schrägaufzug, die öffentliche Bahn und die nicht-öffentliche Bahn. Die Medienberichte in letzter Zeit konzentrieren sich jetzt auf den Schrägaufzug, den habe ich auch vorerst mal als disused markiert, da der Verbund ihn nicht mehr in Betrieb nehmen will.
zalex_ua (2017-04-06 07:22:21+00:00): Якщо є відношення, а вони є для 100% вулиць у Гатному, то назву вулиці додавати до будинку НЕ портрібно, це навіть деструктивно.
Я виправлю такі помилки в цьому чежсеті.
zalex_ua (2017-04-06 07:23:15+00:00): те ж саме стосується інших дублюючих тегів
zalex_ua (2017-04-06 06:07:25+00:00): Ви перейменували вултцю в провуок.
На основі яких даних? Джерело? Де коментар до коміту який це достовірно підтверджує?
До того ж, ви не змінили тег name:uk та не змінили назви у відношенні! Це в первній міні деструктивні дії!
Я роблю відкат вашої правки. Наводьте аргументи.
mavl (2019-01-16 16:37:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-16 16:37:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-24 19:15:47+00:00): Hi PegasusPJ, welcome to OSM. I'm not a local contributor, but I think a local should review this change from leisure=common to park.
PegasusPJ (2017-02-24 22:58:12+00:00): Thanks pitscheplatsch, though I'm local, my softball team ground is there, I live less than a mile away. Nearby Tooting Bec and Clapham commons have been changed the same way already.
Stereo (2017-02-22 15:59:47+00:00): It is the correct tagging :)
pnorman (2017-02-26 02:09:32+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
mavl (2019-01-16 16:36:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-16 16:36:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Austin Zhu (2017-02-24 16:54:30+00:00): 请你不要使用过期的卫星图进行修改，很明显您未经过实地考察以及没有现时的卫星图，这样做出的修改会对使用者造成不必要的麻烦，我将会恢复历史数据至先前状态——osm苏州制图组
de vries (2017-02-27 19:39:19+00:00): hoi, uit je changeset comment maak ik op dat je deze relatie wilde verwijderen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5561371
In plaats daarvan heb je alleen de tags van de relatie verwijderd. Zou je willen kijken wat precies je bedoeling was?

mvg