piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
schoschi (2020-09-08 21:46:34+00:00): Hallo @user_5359, bei dem Tag ist ja gehörig was durcheinander gekommen! Ich wollte not:building=yes setzen; building=no tut es aber genauso gut. Danke, dass Du das bemerkt & korrigiert hast! Schoschi
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:30:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90422875
BCNorwich (2020-09-06 08:01:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say that you've somehow added a lot of self intersections with your mapping. Please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/y3r9w7zg  Could you please rectify these errors. If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
PaulaMartin (2020-09-07 07:20:02+00:00): Hi Benard
Thanks for your comment, and sorry if I have done anything badly. I have tried to do humps, bumps and cushions in the same way by adding them and joining them to a way using the "join node to way" tool on JOSM (I was told every hump, bump and cushion neeed to be merged to a way). I'm not sure how I have added intersections or how I could rectify it. If you could give me some guidelines on how to do this I would be much appreciated.
Many thanks
Paula
BCNorwich (2020-09-07 07:46:17+00:00): Hello Paula, 
I've actually just now started rectifying some of the problems (starting at the south east). I'm correcting the self intersections marked on the link I sent and also amending the wider area. Re-aligning highways, un-joining highways from area lines and generally improving to the now very good aerial imagery. 

With respect, it's a bit difficult doing this un-picking/amending of differing features. I'm happy to carry on with it but would understand your wish to make the corrections. So shall I carry on, it will take a day or two. Then if you make a just a few changes/edits on a changeset I could have a look at them. (It's always good to only have a few changes in an upload/changeset then you've a better chance to see mistakes.)  In this changeset you made changes to over 350 features si stood no chance of seeing mistakes.

I'm running on, what do you think.
Regards Bernard.
PaulaMartin (2020-09-07 07:51:45+00:00): Hi Benard
Thanks for this. If you can carry on and are happy to do it that would be great. Would you be able to just tell me how I have possibly added the self-intersections by following the steps described above? I'm just concious I will be adding more in more boroughs and I will make the same mistakes again?
Many thanks for your help
Paula
BCNorwich (2020-09-07 09:02:54+00:00): Hi, There seem to be differing anomalies of the same happening. Some highway nodes are joined to areas of which some are associated with humps. Others are on highways where you've added humps. 

It looks like you are creating a node, tagging it then joining it to the highway. If you then drag that node to another (better) position that move drags the highway line. Perhaps you are doing this without noticing it? However with some dragged nodes (thus self intersection of highway) there is not the expected tagged hump, though it is on the ground. Have you removed some humps because they look wrong?

I think it would be best if you limit features edited/added to one highway at a time, one highway edit one upload. This way you/I might be able to figure it out. 

Of the many edits though a lot of them haven't been with mistakes so that's a good point.

You might when adding humps find it easier to add the node to the highway then tag that node. By the way some of these features are humps and some are tables.

Regards Bernard.
PaulaMartin (2020-09-07 10:27:30+00:00): Hi Benard

Thanks for the feedback. The odd thing is that this has only happened with humps eventhough I have done cushions and bumps in the same way...

No, I haven't removed any that weren't there before - I have only added the ones I could see that were missing. 

Perhaps as you suggest I should next time be limiting the features I add at once. 

I hope this corrections are not wasting too much of your time.

Many thanks
Paula
BCNorwich (2020-09-09 07:37:06+00:00): Hello Paula,
I'm pretty sure I've corrected all the problems that appeared on the first link (OSM Inspector Geometry, self intersections). But, this morning, OSM Inspector Routing, duplications has been updated and it shows a mass of duplicated sections of ways. (please see here :- https://tinyurl.com/yy4lb95t ).
Bear with me and I'll work through them. Please don't make to correct while I go through them or we'll have more problems.

Regards Bernard.
PaulaMartin (2020-09-09 07:58:10+00:00): Hi Benard
Thanks for this. And do you think this is to do with the "join to way" tool? I have only literally pasted and join the humps to a way, and I can't see why new sections of way have been created...
Perhaps the solution is to join them one by one rather than in batches. I'm really sorry about that.
Thanks
Paula
BCNorwich (2020-09-11 07:18:49+00:00): Hello Paula,
The problems highlighted by OSM Inspector look like they are all corrected. However there may still be the odd traffic hump that has an area dragged to it joining the hump, area and road together, this is a possible error but not classed as incorrect. (I just found corrected one such on Chaseville Park Road, school area was dragged to the hump.) Anyway looks good now and thanks for adding the traffic humps.

If you could detail the precise actions you used to map the humps in this changeset I might be able to work out what went wrong. I wouldn't use the "Join to way tool". An easy way to add traffic humps it to add a node to the existing highway line, precisely position it, then tag it.

Hang on, while writing this I've been trying to make JOSM create these anomalies. It appears that if you are zoomed out to far the join function will malfunction. Further if you have more than one node selected/highlighted then it is even more bizarre. So at least in some of your cases you could have had JOSM zoomed out to far when using the join tool.

Regards Bernard.
PaulaMartin (2020-10-21 09:48:37+00:00): Hi Benard
Aorry, I haven't checked OSM in weeks. You are right. I have now added new items to OSM and the issue was to do with the level of zoom I was using. Thanks very much for your advice. I will try and do my best moving forwards.
Many thanks
Paula
user_11422772 (2020-09-05 12:39:49+00:00): Dear user,
Why you mix Arabic and French names without creating a tag for each name
Your job is full of confusion
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
Greeting
user_5359 (2020-12-12 05:30:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/3410819792/history: What is the meaning of the tag housenumber=dead?
Awania Morish (2020-09-12 10:13:15+00:00): hello @tebby7 great  work
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90424528
pio2_122 (2020-09-07 16:27:21+00:00): tagowanie tych miejsc należy poprawić. (więcej informacji w komentarzu pod https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90424779)
pio2_122 (2020-09-07 16:24:18+00:00): Miejsca niezamieszkałe powinno się oznaczać jako place=locality, a nie place=hamlet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:place%3Dlocality

Z góry dzięki za poprawę!
RicoElectrico (2020-09-08 11:40:21+00:00): Poprawiłem ja :)
vorpalblade (2020-09-05 20:42:27+00:00): Hello. What exactly where you intending to do with this changeset? (Also, `vandalism revenge` is an interesting choice of username). I haven't gone through all of the changes, but the Blue Mesa Powerplant modification looks reasonable, I just don't know if you were trying to fix stuff, modify stuff, or vandalize stuff (again, I'm not as inclined towards that since at least one of the changes looks reasonable).
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:31:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90425056
Jolesh (2020-09-04 16:41:23+00:00): Insbesondere der Turm hat noch Optimierungsbedarf.
ff5722 (2020-09-04 16:49:25+00:00): https://www.prorail.nl/vervoerders/nieuws/overweg-hooghalen-dicht-en-meer-maatregelen
matt_ellery (2020-09-04 22:29:07+00:00): Hi Dan,

Thanks for your recent updates to Horsham and Wickhurst Green. Just a note to say that it's good practice to keep & enhance existing elements rather than deleting and replacing them: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

All the best,
Matt
b-jazz (2020-09-17 01:45:55+00:00): Hi QuintB, can you tell me what this way is supposed to be? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844353376

It doesn't have any tags.
QuintB (2020-09-17 18:13:54+00:00): "Deleted" haha, I think it was a first attempt at the shop parking lot there. Good catch!
b-jazz (2020-09-17 19:49:48+00:00): Cool. I kind of thought that might have been the case. Thanks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-04 22:30:38+00:00): Dzięki za aktualizację!
aceman444 (2020-10-29 20:40:46+00:00): Ak je ta lanovka "byvala", tak za prve to nestaci dat do nazvu (kam to nepatri vobec), a uz vobec sa to nema znacit ako funkcna lanovka (aerialway=rope_tow). Uz predtym tam boli znacky abandoned:aerialway=chair_lift co bolo spravne a vyjadrovalo opustenu rozpadajucu sa lanovku, pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:P%C5%99edpona_%C5%BEivotn%C3%ADho_cyklu . Cize tu cela zmena je uplne zbytocna.
eggie (2020-09-04 21:37:29+00:00): Dag Tuffmoor.. Je hebt de landuse forest vastgeplakt aan de omliggende wegen. De kaart wordt dan moeilijk te bewerken voor andere makkers. Svp geen wegen vastplakken aan wegen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-04 21:43:58+00:00): De landuse heb ik losgemaakt van de wegen.
skfd (2020-09-08 13:19:07+00:00): hello! why did you changed bump to hump? you are not local there I presume and humps are rare in this region. It's two different things....
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90427706
eggie (2020-09-04 21:46:12+00:00): Hier heb ik het weer aangepast en de landuse weer losgemaakt van de wegen. Svp geen vlakken aan wegen vastmaken.
De oostelijke Loonsevaart ook aangepast aan het werkelijke verloop. 
MVG,
eggie
user_5359 (2020-09-05 08:05:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use lowercase keys (name, place). What is the meaning of the way without any tags?
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-05 07:42:33+00:00): Hi Rush211211, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several parts of this golf course, which have been mapped by a different contributor yesterday? Thanks.

#Golf
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Rush211211 (2020-09-05 13:09:18+00:00): Hello. 

I was making corrections that I saw were different if mapping of fairways, bunkers  and greens. 

Thank you
user_2066394 (2020-09-04 23:18:19+00:00): Ballett am Deister: Schule für künstlerischen Tanz, Degerser Straße 30 hast du nach Norden verschoben, die muss noch an die richtige Stelle.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90429120
Dakon (2020-09-08 17:21:50+00:00): Den Teil mit der Tanzschule habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90599312 zurückgesetzt. Laut aktuellem Bild ist die wohl immer noch da, jedenfalls nicht mitten auf der Mauer.
literan (2020-09-05 12:01:12+00:00): причал (пирс) обозначается другим тегом. Марина это другое - целый комплекс причалов, обычно с местами заправки, электричеством для яхт, питанием, ремонтом и т.п. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dmarina

Исправлю.
eggie (2020-09-04 22:02:23+00:00): Best lastig water en landuse .. Water kun je niet mappen op bos. je ziet dan alles door elkaar. Je zult dus bos en water netjes moeten scheiden.
Met de parkeerplaats heb ik dat al gedaan.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-09-04 22:32:23+00:00): Bij het landgoed heb ik ook alle stukken bos die je op het bosgebied hebt gelegd verwijderd. Het is toch allemaal al bos.. Daar hoeft niet nog eens bos op. 
Het water heb ik gescheiden van dat bos zodat je geen zwemmende bomen meer ziet. 
Gr eggie
clairedelune (2021-02-05 15:17:18+00:00): Hi Zoocat56, I see you are mainly mapping Kinshasa entities. Could please tell me why this boundary was changed from administrative to political?
Zoocat56 (2021-02-06 17:51:11+00:00): Hi Clairedelune, Funa and the other three districts are former administrative divisions of Kinshasa from the Mobutu era.  They are electoral districts of the National Assembly and are still boundaries of many administrative services but are not administrative divisions.  See wikipedia article for more details.
user_5359 (2020-09-05 08:09:06+00:00): Hello! Please have look on way http://www.osmp.org/way/146234856: What is the meaning of tag Sity=Бор. Please notice also: An address isn't part of a street.
nw520 (2020-09-04 21:49:45+00:00): Hallo omegapetit, danke fürs Eintragen der Sitzbänke. Bitte erlaube mir aber den Hinweis, dass der name=* Tag nicht für Beschreibungen, sondern ausschließlich für Namen zu verwenden ist. Konkret kann man bei einer Sitzbank den Namen einfach weglassen. Ich habe das so abgeändert und zudem die Sitzbank mit Tisch zu einem Piknicktisch umgetaggt. 

Beste Grüße und frohes Kartieren!
Dakon (2020-09-08 17:16:45+00:00): Ich habe den Teil mit den building:levels in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90599143 gerade zurückgesetzt: die von dir gemeinten 1.OG sind als roof:levels erfasst, da sie sich innerhalb der Dachschräge befinden.
ff5722 (2020-12-29 19:59:03+00:00): Just want to give my appreciation for how detailed you traced the motorway and exits 👍
Maps Man (2024-07-09 17:32:29+00:00): Thanks
Famlam (2020-09-13 17:34:48+00:00): Dag Alphabetbubi, vanwaar voldoet het fietspad om de rotonde volgens jou niet aan de voorwaarden van junction=roundabout?
alexey_zakharenkov (2020-09-30 22:51:39+00:00): Добрый день.
Действительно ли часть здания начинается с 3-го этажа? building:min_level=2 означает
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:min_level
Grass-snake (2020-10-01 05:26:30+00:00): Добрый, да, здесь арка высотой в 2 этажа. Я часто бываю в этом районе, если надо - сделаю фотку в доказательство.
Grass-snake (2020-10-01 05:27:29+00:00): Кстати, предыдущий маппер что-то намудрил с полигонами когда размечал части здания, мне кажется лучше переделать.
alexey_zakharenkov (2020-10-01 06:41:25+00:00): Чисто технически тут всё ок. https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=55.88773&lon=37.45582&zoom=18.4&tilt=45&rotation=-46
Grass-snake (2020-10-01 17:31:00+00:00): Я смотрю на это здание через F4map.
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=55.8884642&lon=37.4568727&zoom=18&camera.theta=53.881&camera.phi=36.383
Вы не знаете почему эта арка не отображается на этой карте?
alexey_zakharenkov (2020-10-01 18:51:11+00:00): Первое, на что стоит обратить внимание - это подпись "updated a month ago" в строке атрибуции, так что если ваши правки более свежие, они могли ещё не проявиться. Однако я посмотрел ещё несколько частей зданий с тегом building:min_level - ни одна не отображается правильно. Так что проблема рендера.
Grass-snake (2020-10-04 11:41:24+00:00): Вот фотка этого проёма с северной стороны:
https://i.ibb.co/W6mDSr8/IMG-20201004-092300-1.jpg
Вот с южной:
https://i.ibb.co/QmQ0Tcq/IMG-20201004-092348-1-1.jpg
Ширина проёма, возможно, указана неправильно, но я смотрел на правильность отрисовки в 3D.
martianfreeloader (2022-05-06 16:11:48+00:00): Hi,

it has been reported that there is no parking space here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2714444

Aerial imagery also shows no parking space.

Did you perhaps map this in the wrong location?
martianfreeloader (2022-05-06 16:13:56+00:00): There's a parking mapped a bit further north: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3876340592

Did you perhaps mean that one?
Vid_Pogačnik (2022-05-07 05:19:14+00:00): I'd say the current location of parking lot is OK.
martianfreeloader (2022-05-07 12:54:22+00:00): So are you saying that both

- this one https://www.osm.org/way/844378265

- and the one a few hundred metres to the North https://www.osm.org/node/3876340592

exist in reality?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 20:04:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3377924

Can you look at this note? Maybe you can help with it even if plenty of time since the edit (if not - then I wish you a happy mapping!)
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-05 07:42:49+00:00): Hi Rush211211, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several parts of this golf course, which have been mapped by a different contributor? Thanks.

#Golf
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-17 06:13:20+00:00): Hi, I noticed you added a few ford=yes nodes connecting paved roads with waterways (such as node 7876464593). Fords are when  you have to drive/walk through water; instead these should be tagged as culverts or bridges in the future. Thanks!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aford%3Dyes
ottwiz (2020-09-05 16:35:56+00:00): Thanks for the correction! I'm mapping nowadays Marshall County and yeah, i wasn't sure what was on the area or what landuse tag should I use.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:18:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90432130
SomeoneElse (2020-09-04 21:27:03+00:00): Hello, 
You've made a number of changes in the last few hours with the comment "Trunk roads need to have a speed limit of 40 mph or over AND be divided per osm standards".  This suggests that you're not actually editing these roads based on survey, but performing a mechanical edit based on the currently-mapped OSM speed limit.
Please only make this sort fo edit after discussing with the community.
A number of your recent edits (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10165657 ) have been reverted because other community members did not agree with them.  Please make no further changes of this type until you have responded to the comments raised so far, and also discuss these "trunk" changes with the rest of the community.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Fluffy89502 (2020-09-25 18:35:09+00:00): Sorry for my irresponsibility. I’ll make sure to execute what you stated if I edit again.
Frans S (2020-09-05 13:36:13+00:00): Hello Thanks for mapping here
It's a long time ago since you were active here.
Welcome back
iD Editor: Be aware that iD editor hides OSM features from view to enhance performance. There is a blue notice that appears at the bottom of iD Editor indicating whether OSM features are being hidden. Zoom in until no features are hidden before editing. This will ensure you are not duplicating existing mapping.
quite a number of buildings are 2x mapped.
Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them
This is a task with complex buildings . not an ideal start for a beginner mapper.
If that is the case, stop maping on that task and find another easier to map task.

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-09-05 13:49:30+00:00): Please take a look to your original mapping and how it had to be mapped.
You need to have experience for that
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1b1-ZjhuB_8Is4oLvw0aMcqhugxUaEYt3/view?usp=sharing
Best regards
eggie (2020-09-04 20:52:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Zo te zien is dit niet helemaal goed gegaan. access=no betekent dat daar niemand mag komen. access=no moet dus eigenlijk weg. Verder heb je het bos aan de Westsingel vastgeplakt.
Kijk eens goed naar je edits en ga pas door als je ziet dat er geen fouten in zitten. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90432375
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-04 20:55:04+00:00): Het zal vast wel een highway path zijn, maar het is niet goed zichtbaar omdat je het op slot hebt gezet met access=no
Die regel dus weghalen. 
Gr eggie
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-05 07:39:31+00:00): Hi Mirza Shahbaz Riaz, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped objects? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
eggie (2020-09-04 20:56:57+00:00): access=yes overruled andere verboden.Dus die regel helemaal verwijderen
Staat er vooraan het bekende blauwe bord met de wandelaar. Dan is het een footway.. Staat dat er niet dan highway=path
Dus welk bord staat er?
eggie (2020-09-04 21:03:33+00:00): De landuse heb ik weer losgemaakt van de wegen.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-09-04 21:11:00+00:00): access=yes heb ik verwijderd..   Het paadje heb ik omgezet naar path. Je zult zien dat het nu betert rendert op de kaart. 
MVG,
Eggie
GinaroZ (2020-09-07 21:15:00+00:00): I've the name "recycle" from the road, as I doubt it is actually called that.
glibbertorsten (2021-05-20 18:27:21+00:00): Hallo Dero! Ich dachte, mein Navi wär kaputt, als es mich heute durch das gesperrte Stückchen Straße navigieren wollte. Aber nein: du hast etwas unvollständiges durch etwas falsches ersetzt - das ist nicht die feine englische Art... Was du in deinem Änderungskommentar suchtest war wahrscheinlich "oneway:bicycle=no".
Ich denke jetzt ist das Tagging vollständig: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105045415
Gruß
eggie (2020-09-04 21:34:44+00:00): Dag Joen... Tip.. Je kunt het hek als node op de weg toevoegen.. barrier=gate
Op die node kun je verder ook accesstags toevoegen.
Is het voor niemand toegankelijk. Ook niet voor voetgangers?
MVG,
Eggie
Joen7 (2020-09-05 11:24:55+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip Eggie! Heb het aangepast. 
In dit geval kun je inderdaad vanaf de westkant het pad in, maar de eigenaar heeft meerdere prikkeldraden aangebracht (boven elkaar, met handvaten, om er zelf door te kunnen) zodat toegang vanaf de weg prive is.
eggie (2020-09-05 14:55:46+00:00): Dat is inderdaad geen doen als je met de fiets bent.
Joen7 (2020-09-05 21:32:34+00:00): Bedankt weer voor je feedback! 
Ik heb de 'fence' die geen contact maakte met het pad, nu vervangen door een 'barrier=fence' op het pad.
Weer wat geleerd :-)
Jillis inactivE (2020-09-11 14:49:42+00:00): Hoi, de natuurspeelplaats ziet er mooi uit zo op de kaart. Maar .. dit is niet overeenkomstig de werkelijkheid die ik ken. En ik kom er zeer vaak want we wonen er naast.
Gatalin (2020-09-14 17:01:43+00:00): Ik ben pas in de buurt komen wonen en heb mij na een wandeling door het park vooral laten leiden door de plattegrond bij de ingang en de bgt viewer. Ik zal deze week nog eens gaan kijken waar er verschillen in zitten.
m@rio (2021-03-02 22:08:33+00:00): Cześć sznik,
mam pytanie odnośnie dodanej przez Ciebie w tym zestawie stacji paliw w m. Białężyn, przy drodze 178.
Wg mojego rozpoznania została ona dawno temu zamknięta i do dziś działającej stacji nie ma w tym miejscu.
Czy wiesz może, że coś się w tym zakresie zmieniło?

pzdr, m@rio
sznik (2021-03-08 16:36:41+00:00): W wakacje byłem tylko przejazdem i skasowałem już nagranie. Teraz nie mam pojęcia, czy ta stacja była czynna.

Pozdrawiam sznik
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-18 17:20:07+00:00): If you're going to add buildings, at least make sure they are 1) squared using "q" and 2) resemble what is actually in the aerial imagery.
archie (2020-09-04 23:40:40+00:00): Varför raderade du place=island från multipolygonen Nord-Koster? Har ön fått landförbindelse och därmed upphört att vara en ö? Var vänlig och låt bli att radera något i relationer/multipolygoner till dess du vet vad du gör, tack.