piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-02-09 15:51:20+00:00): Feedback

Wanneer je de breedte van een pad niet weet kun je die beter weglaten. 
Een breedte van nul  zal niet kloppen.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-09 16:00:04+00:00): 'k Heb het aangepast zodat het routeert.. De padden hadden geen verbinding met de wegen op de parkeerplaats.
breedte nul verwijderd
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-02-09 16:53:42+00:00): padden??> typo paden
Las Wolski (2024-02-29 10:57:06+00:00): Chciałbym przenieść tagi muzem z obszaru na budynek pomiędzy szybem Campi, a Maszyną parową (a dokładniej na punkt na tym budynku), bo w tym budynku są kasy i wejście pod ziemię.
Obszar, które jest otagowany aktualnie jako muzeum jest duży i jego północna część jest raczej pusta. Precyzyjniej i wygodniej dla użytkownika mapy byłoby postawienie tagu muzeum na wspomnianym punkcie, bo na ten punkt kieruje się turysta.
olo81 (2024-02-29 13:15:43+00:00): Nie edytujemy pod render. Ale to twoja decyzja, i może nikt nie będzie mieć nic przeciwko. Ja nie mam.
olo81 (2024-02-29 14:01:56+00:00): Jeszcze jest opcja relacji. Z tego co pamiętam w relacjach można określić miejsce wyświetlania się nazwy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-29 20:26:37+00:00): pytanie czy ta północna część terenu gdzie na zdjęciach lotniczych terenu nic nie ma to też muzeum...

(to pewnie teren należący do muzeum ale tam chyba nijak nic nie ma do zwiedzania)
Las Wolski (2024-02-29 21:23:21+00:00): @olo81 Bardzo dziękuję za szybką i pozytywną odpowiedź!
Wydaje mi się, że to nie jest edytowanie pod render, a raczej precyzyjniejsze mapowanie (tak rozumiem komentarz Mateusza).
olo81 (2024-02-29 22:50:22+00:00): Hm, ktoś już zrobił relacje. Ale jak dla mnie dodawanie tego co jest pod ziemią chyba jest błędem. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14354500#map=16/49.9718/20.4204
Las Wolski (2024-03-01 08:03:45+00:00): Podziemny obszar ma tag 'location=underground'. Ktoś przerysował ten obszar z map znajdujących się na stronach UNESCO - patrz https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/32/maps/ - tam jest plik PDF (ma kilka stron), a na nim mapy dla Wieliczki i Bochni. Bezpośredni link do pliku mapy -> https://whc.unesco.org/document/124225
Czyli w OSM jest jak na mapach UNESCO.

Zastanawiam się, jak to powinno być mapowane w OSM - patrz moja wypowiedź na forum na ten temat -> https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapowanie-zabytkow/108795/31
Raczej bym ten podziemny obszar zostawił, ale dodałbym też tagi heritage=1 na muzeum z wejściem pod ziemię do zaznaczonego obszaru chronionego.
mariotomo (2021-02-12 13:29:22+00:00): Hi BigKev97.  this is a larger changeset, would it be possible that you describe it a bit in better detail than just "Calles"?  it would be nice if you would use one or more verbs of action.  is this part of an organized edit, maybe?
mariotomo (2021-02-12 13:35:53+00:00): what is your source for the names you're adding/editing?
czubi (2021-02-12 07:21:46+00:00): Der Baum heist "Unter den Linden"?
itze79 (2021-02-12 09:56:08+00:00): Der Platz mit den 4 Bäumen heißt so!
Dann muss es wieder ein Notes sein!?
czubi (2021-02-12 12:20:19+00:00): Der Platz hat den offiziellen Namen (mit (Straßen)Schild) und allem drumunddran, oder der Platz wird von den Einheimischen umgangssprachlich so genannt? 
Ich vermute mal letzterses.
czubi (2021-02-12 12:24:41+00:00): Der Baum hat wirklich 5 m StammDURCHMESSER?
Hier steht er hat 3,5m UMFANG
https://www.baumkunde.de/baumregister/2887-linden_in_dannheim/
benoitdd (2021-02-09 09:20:48+00:00): il faudrait peut-être conserver Avenue des Aygalades en old_name? d'autant + si le nom occitan est conservé
Cascafico (2021-03-07 20:15:38+00:00): Che fonti per il "Museo delle Pieve"?
Which sources for tourism=museum "Museo delle Pieve"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98931912
kretes (2021-02-11 20:22:22+00:00): Co to się stało z ul. Grenadierów przy ul. Ostrobramskiej?
Mateusz Adamowski (2021-02-11 21:06:30+00:00): Rety, nie mam pojęcia. Trzeba to wycofać. Musiał mi się zawiesić edytor podczas przesuwania mapy i nie zauważyłem, że przesunąłem jakiś punkt.
Mateusz Adamowski (2021-02-11 21:10:46+00:00): poprawione
Cascafico (2021-03-07 20:17:49+00:00): Which sources for "Altare della fonte"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98932139
eggie (2021-02-09 15:49:51+00:00): Dag Dijksjes
Je vraagt om feedback
Wanneer de school er niet meer is en je hebt die info verwijderd is het oke. let wel; op als het een officiële BAG adresnode betreft dat je alleen de schoolinfo verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2021-02-09 10:09:12+00:00): Hi coolmule0,

what's the meaning of the Sabina House=* tag?
coolmule0 (2021-02-09 14:02:17+00:00): Its an error. It should be addr:housename="Sabina House"
mariotomo (2021-02-12 13:33:13+00:00): Hi BigKev97.  you are adding names to residential roads, declaring as source "Bing" and leaving the "source" label in the objects you are editing.  this sounds to me like introducing confusion.
damjang (2021-03-05 14:03:31+00:00): Si prega di rimuovere i nomi sulle singole way. Come già detto i nomi ci sono già nella relazione. Non duplichiamo i dati per niente... il che rende difficile gestire il tutto! Grazie!
alessandrocarmeli (2021-03-06 12:46:11+00:00): Assolutamente no, ci siamo accordati nella comunità telegram nazionale ed abbiamo deciso che va bene così come ho fatto. D'altronde è come in tutte le altre A e RA italiani che hanno il nome nella singola way!
Volendo per maggiori chiarimenti può scrivermi via mail che la trova nel mio profilo!
skorasaurus (2021-02-09 00:32:24+00:00): thanks for the updates; looks good dro!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98933387
dns10 (2021-02-09 03:27:48+00:00): Thanks Will. Sorry if any of these are sloppy. I kinda went on a spree and realized now I should probably slow down to make sure I am tagging appropriately
skorasaurus (2021-02-10 15:24:31+00:00): I did a brief look; and it generally looks a-ok; the only thing I'd suggest is that the jersey barriers impede the footways that were there so the crosswalk needs to be added.
skorasaurus (2021-02-10 15:24:58+00:00): (which was probably a mistake on my part for not including the jersey barriers there in the first place and mismapping it ;))
Cascafico (2021-02-09 09:51:58+00:00): Come detto nei commenti alla precedente versione delle way, il nome non va su ogni singola geometria. Se ne è parlato molto. Se vuoi insistere, proponi il tuo metodo sui canali ufficiali.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98933415
alessandrocarmeli (2021-02-09 10:24:07+00:00): nelle altre autostrade è così indicato
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98933415
AntMadeira (2021-02-09 02:38:54+00:00): Olá, Dikel.
Vi que fizeste algumas alterações no cruzamento da CM 1269-1 com a EN 243. Podes dizer-me se há divisão física no final da CM 1269-1 para teres dividido a faixa de rodagem?
O mesmo pergunto para a EM 591, na Rua 5 de Outubro.

Outra coisa: aconselho o uso das imagens ESRI e não da Bing, pois as da Bing são mais antigas e têm maior distorção.

Qualquer dúvida, podes contactar-me ou entrar no canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa de OSM.


Cumprimentos,
António.
mikkolukas (2021-08-29 06:19:09+00:00): Beware!

you are removing correct tagging and replacing it with wrong tagging.

The effect is that you are putting access=no on a main road.

access:lanes=|no means that there is TWO lanes, where the right lane is access=no

access:lanes=no means that there is ONE lane and that lane is access=no

You replaced the first with the second which is completely wrong. Please make sure to read the tagging guides thoroughly again.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
trigpoint (2021-02-09 12:56:52+00:00): Diolch, however name:en="Fairy Glen" is still missing.

Cheers Phil
philippec (2021-02-09 20:10:52+00:00): Ik moet wel ieder keer in edit gaan om de foto te zien.
L'imaginaire (2021-02-13 09:29:09+00:00): Tagging is correct (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mapillary), maar het zou inderdaad goed zijn mocht de Mapillary key worden omgevormd tot een klikbare link.
philippec (2021-02-13 09:31:47+00:00): Ik heb mij er indertijd tegen verzet, omdat ik het verschil tussen theorie en praktijk ken.  Zie de discussie.
Bovendien is een filter soms ook nuttig.
L'imaginaire (2021-02-16 10:03:33+00:00): Via Overpass krijg je trouwens wel direct een klikbare link: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/13HH
Alfrerojas (2021-02-14 03:36:47+00:00): Finca La Florida
trigpoint (2021-02-09 10:26:52+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

In OSM we use a highway type which reflects the physical nature and looking at imagery I can see it was correctly mapped as a track.

By changing it to a footway you are preventing vehicles reaching the farm, which clearly is incorrect.

From historic imagery it appears to be a white road, so was correctly mapped.

You may want to clarify access which you have already done but it should be put back to a track. Footway implies foot only to routers.

Cheers Phil
Alan WG (2021-02-09 13:09:35+00:00): Hello Phil, Thank you for your feedback. Obviously, I am new to OSM but old to the farm which my family have owned since 1840.

The Cliff Lane is impassible for cars and only good as a footpath. I have long since placed signs up to this affect. The problem is that the head end of the stream visible on the map, makes passage very marshy (with a pond being on the other side NW of the road. Tractors cannot use this path yet Garmin and Google send delivery trucks and tourists here, necessitating  tow outs and my continued repairs to the area afterwards.

I have tried to improve this area with drainage schemes etc. many times without success.

Further towards the cliff face, a sharp turn and dips are hazards to mufflers and transmissions.

Any help to correctly map this would be appreciated.

Kind Regards,

Alan
Alan WG (2021-02-09 13:13:36+00:00): Phil please also note, Withnoe Barton Farm is accessed vehicularly from the junction of Withnoe Lane and  Radford lane.
trigpoint (2021-02-09 17:19:35+00:00): Thank you Alan
That makes sense. The track needs to be split as the northern part is far better quality than the southern part and tags need to reflect this to encourage deliveries to approach from the north.

I have tidied it up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98991552

Cheers Phil
SekeRob (2021-02-09 15:22:55+00:00): The roundabouts are being messed with on Marconi... they have laid asphalt straight across and at the same they have installed many refuge islands to stop the Jackie Icks that roam the town. Who knows will they be painting cycle tracks and ASL's like on D'Annunzio next months. ;O)
Happy mapping, in isolation.
(To be continued.)
FinixFighter (2021-02-10 08:35:58+00:00): Yes, I also thought that, but they are being working for months, I don't think they're gonna finish in less than a couple of months. When they'll finish I'll add (or someone else will add) cycleways and whatsoever (I hope there will be cycleways). Happy mapping to you too, I hope this situation about the virus will finish as soon as possible because I'm going mad! :P
bilboed (2021-03-03 17:28:21+00:00): Ce changeset introduit une erreur massive au niveau de la place des patriotes qui part en biais vers le sud ...

Serait-il possible de retirer ce changeset en entier ?
dekadense (2021-03-03 20:02:14+00:00): Ce n'est pas moi qui ait fait cette modif et j'ai pas réussi à rectifier ...
bilboed (2021-03-04 07:41:07+00:00): j'ai corrige depuis.

Et si, c'etait bien ce changeset qui a introduit l'erreur. Merci de verifier les warnings de votre editeur avant d'envoyer des modifications. Ici il y a plein de warnings (visible dans les tags en plus) se plaignant de rues et batiments qui ont des intersections ...
andygol (2021-02-09 10:34:34+00:00): Доброго дня, Salmonleg.

Дивлюся на цей та інші ваші імпорти адрес і у мене є кілька запитань та пропозицій щодо них.

 1. Будь ласка, ознайомтесь з [Настановами, щодо Імпорту]https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Import/Guidelines) та створіть документацію (опис ваших дій для убезпечення вашого внеску від вилучення). Ваші дії підпадають під неузгоджений імпорт і можуть бути вилучені будь-ким, хто вважатиме їх такими, або ваш внесок може бути вилучений DWG за зверненнями когось з учасників, або навіть без такого звернення.

2. Українська спільнота має [домовленості щодо позначення номерів будинків з літерами](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Адреси#Будівлі), було б добре як би ви привели номери будинків до узгодженого формату.

3. В описі джерел ви зазначаєте, що дані про адреси взяті з кадастру, як мені відомо з кадастру за раз можна отримати адресу тільки одного будинку/земельної ділянки, яким чином вам вдалося отримати всі ці адреси? (Це також пов'язано з п.1, за наявності опису ваших дій потреби в цьому питанні не було б)

З повагою,  

andygol
osmviborg (2021-02-09 06:00:57+00:00): Hej. En meget lille detalje. Gider du ændre 'overfalde' til 'overflade'?
Sulfo (2021-02-09 11:07:11+00:00): Det tør siges - den kunne næppe være mindre.
Jeg vil gøre et forsøg 🙂
MxxCon (2021-02-09 02:51:15+00:00): Hello.
What did you base this edit on? Do you have some sort of map?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98936849
pixely (2021-02-09 04:07:51+00:00): Thanks for taking the time to look at this! I was in this station and mezzanine earlier today.

The subway entrances were based on satellite view, the entrance was built where there used to be emergency exits or grates (as seen from satellite view.)

What I'm less sure about is the mezzanine, the shape is approximated based on the positioning of the grates on south side of the street visible from the concourse below  (for example, there is a set of 3 grates right at where the mezzanine splits up), and referencing videos like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVtSYm9yabs. I read https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/6213/what-is-the-minimal-expected-accuracy-of-maps, but I'm not sure if this level of approximation is allowed or adding the mezzanine was a necessary addition in the first place.
jmapb (2021-02-11 02:15:34+00:00): Hi pixely, welcome & thanks for your work. I'm not wondering so much about the exact geometry but about tagging this underground subway station as a building. That's something I haven't seen before. Is this an established tagging practice?
pixely (2021-02-11 03:07:30+00:00): I'm not sure what the appropriate tag would be for a subway entrance and concourse, so I selected "Subway Station". I noticed that nearby stations (like Franklin Av station 1 block west, and Atlantic Avenue-Barclays Center) use "Train Station Building" but I did not see that as an option in the editor.
jmapb (2021-02-11 04:48:50+00:00): The Franklin Av station is tagged as a building because it's above ground. Atlantic really isn't but it still has one old "head house" at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248165091 which is mapped as a building. (It might make sense to map the above-ground portion of the entrance at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1956618005 as a building too.)

As far as I know there really isn't yet an official standard for how to map the areas of a subway stop between the entrances and the platforms. Plenty of people have made attempts, but they don't all seem to agree on how. But the general rule is: if it's not above ground, it's not a building.

You've really jumped into the thick of it by starting off with mapping the subways! They definitely need a lot of work, but the methods for mapping them are still unstandardized and under development. There are always new proposals for how to deal with this stuff, and I'm not always up to speed, but I'm happy to talk about it if you have any other questions.

Good luck, J
MxxCon (2021-02-11 05:11:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations documents some of the aspects of mapping subway stations.
jmapb (2021-02-11 13:32:59+00:00): Unfortunately the wiki's not too much help regarding subway station mapping, at least not at the moment. It simply says "currently there are a number of proposals relating to subterranean stations" but doesn't give any concrete information on tags and best practices. At some point, hopefully, the community will coalesce behind a standard.
clay_c (2021-02-11 16:59:20+00:00): I've been mapping the excavated underground areas of subway stations as `building=train_station` + `location=underground`. There are a few examples elsewhere in the world of this tagging scheme being used (I'd link an Overpass query here but my home internet is broken right now and I'm on my phone). The default renderer seems to support this tagging scheme elegantly, having them show up underneath the surface-level streets and buildings.

My understanding is that these are train station buildings that happen to be underground, hence this tagging scheme. I'm curious to hear others' opinions and rationale though.
clay_c (2021-02-11 17:13:32+00:00): Here's a more complete example that I've worked on in San Francisco: https://openlevelup.net/#19/37.78432/-122.40773

Once the data loads, try exploring the basement levels by clicking on the negative numbers on the right sidebar. The underground station building outline shows up based on the maximum and minimum levels given in its tags. The station is further subdivided into indoor areas, rooms, and railway platforms.
jmapb (2021-02-11 18:02:50+00:00): Some train stations have buildings, and some don't. I've always understood that underground space does not equal a building, but these standards change over time. (The wiki mentions building=cellar + location=underground, for instance.) 

If it's demonstrably good for the map to call subway stations underground buildings, I don't have a problem with that. But it would be great to have these methods documented somewhere. If the wiki's too fraught maybe consider a diary entry?

(Sorry to be spamming you with all this pixely ... public transit mapping is "can:contents=worms".)
clay_c (2021-02-11 20:57:52+00:00): I went ahead and changed the area mapped here to `indoor=area` because it doesn't seem to represent the entire underground station. I encourage pixely to map the indoor areas corresponding to the other entrances, and to connect the indoor areas to both the upper- and lower-level platforms however they're connected IRL.

A diary entry seems like a good idea. This isn't the first time I've run into tagging disputes on underground stations. Perhaps documenting it will alleviate some confusion and provide a place to discuss and come to a consensus. I'll write one up soon.
MxxCon (2021-02-11 21:09:46+00:00): I guess since underground "buliding" mapping is unclear, at least we should be mapping walkways to connect things. Probably especially the long ones further away from the actual stations?
clay_c (2021-02-13 02:27:54+00:00): Diary entry here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/clay_c/diary/395781
aharvey (2021-02-10 08:35:03+00:00): I upgraded the tagging to be a shared path allowing pedestrians access.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
santamariense (2021-02-09 02:51:13+00:00): Olá. Estive revisando sua edição. Parece estar tudo OK. Fique a vontade para perguntar sobre qualquer dúvida que tenhas.
Você detalhou bem os dados da mecânica. É também possivel mapear adiconar detalhes como whatsapp e outras redes sociais.
Participe do grupo OSM RS no Telegram: https://t.me/osmrs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98938215
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
user_5359 (2021-02-09 05:19:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
mariotomo (2021-07-04 17:15:58+00:00): hola. una curiosidad relativa al estilo de mapeo. para qué poner un nodo leisure dentro de una way leisure, perfectamente iguales? 
Way: 905265663
Node: 8406870299
MapGrid (2021-02-09 03:30:20+00:00): FYI.  The old shape of the time zone boundary in SE Labrador was clearly based off a KML file that I created and uploaded to the Internet in 2007. That was prior to the completion of the HWY system. Things have changed since then; they highways were completed and the government erected a time zone change sign (complete with poorly drawn map) along HWY 510.
MapGrid (2021-02-09 03:42:42+00:00): http://www.erichall.eu/images/1709/1709309.jpg
https://www.thetelegram.com/news/local/labrador-time-legal-or-not-154860/
MapGrid (2021-02-09 03:53:47+00:00): There is a small problem which I cannot resolve.  The road signs appear to show a boundary formed from two straight lines.
One of the lines appears to be an extension of the boundary between Petit-Mécatina and Labrador; i.e. it is a north-south line at 57°06'32"W.  The problem is that the actual time zone sign lies about 1 mile east of that line.
kucai (2021-04-19 10:05:28+00:00): You are doing the detached houses all wrong. Please do not migrate whatever msm mapping scheme into OSM. Do not put description "vacant plot/recreation etc" as names. If there is no name, leave it be.
JJIglesias (2021-02-09 04:26:20+00:00): El area que ampliaste del parque NO es consistente con su extension territorial tanto en imagenes satelites como de calle, por lo tanto lo he ajustado a la data disponible hasta la Casa de la Cultura Jaime Saenz.
Favor tener precaucion con sobredimensionar cualquier elemento del mapa.
Gracias
JJIglesias (2021-02-09 04:15:40+00:00): El area es un Instituto de Formacion Militar, con Nivel de Instituto Universitario. Que tenga arboles o Pasto NO la convierten en Parque.
Te sugerimos leer:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Gracias