piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mweper (2017-08-17 00:39:27+00:00): Hola Bdahrouge. La etiqueta «building=house» se utiliza sólo para el edificio de la casa y no para marcar el terreno. Para la parcela o terreno se puede usar «place=plot» ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place=plot ) y no se debe poner «name=casa» si no tiene específicamente un nombre particular.
-
Por favor, corrige eso. Cualquier duda, me puedes contactar. Saludos.
Supaplex (2017-10-01 18:33:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DaveF (2017-08-17 16:51:55+00:00): BTM is already tagged with railway=station in both a polygon & a relation. You've now added a third as a node. 
The polygon's name label is rendered in ORM.

I note ORM appear to render your node's name label twice, in grey & blue. Are you aware of a reason for this?
Fluclo (2017-08-17 18:40:21+00:00): No idea on the reason, but until this node was added, OpenRailwayMap was not showing the railway station name in Blue (every other station in the area was). Now it is showing the railway station in Blue at zoom level 11 which is what I would expect for a principle railway station.
DaveF (2017-08-17 18:52:45+00:00): You're duplicting data which is to be discouraged. You should contact ORM to ask why it renders differently. Please don't tag incorrectly to suit the renderer.
Supaplex (2017-10-01 18:36:02+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
5m4u9 (2017-08-17 03:38:25+00:00): qué lindo ver tus mejoras al mapa :)

solo para apuntar, en algún momento acordamos que para bolivia todas las calles/avenidas/pasajes deben tener el prefijo antes del nombre... como lo has estado haciendo vos, buena esa!

hay casos iguales como hospitales, escuelas, iglesias, calles, parques, bancos entre otros que en sus nombres pueden tener su misma categoría... por ejemplo "Banco Unión" o "Caja Petrolera de Salud"....

por otro lado, el resto como son facilmente reconocibles y no son ambiguas, debemos quitar su categoria del nombre... es decir ya no poner "Farmacia ABC" sino solo "ABC"... el resto se autocompleta en el sofware.

velo, como cuando aprendias de bases de datos, es redundante poner un dato duplicado muchas veces, si se puede extraer y solo asociarlo.
ofevivi (2017-08-17 13:08:11+00:00): Marco, muchas gracias por tu valioso feedback  ( :
Upendrakarukonda (2017-08-17 04:45:20+00:00): Hello  rich uy,

Welcome to the OpenStreetMap. You had added the feature drain in the sea with name = 'EXAMPLE NO.1'. Drain is the feature which exists on the ground to manipulate the storm water. For reference https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain. Can you please check and verify this?

Happy to help,
Upendra.
oormilavinod (2017-08-17 05:02:30+00:00): hey k durga prasad,  welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node and added all the attributes to this it. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park and the attributes are added to the way itself. i have made the required changes here  . keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-08-17 04:58:52+00:00): hey MisterBartender welcome to osm. i appreciate your inteest in mapping, i noticed from your edits that you have added a polygon and tagged it as a waterbody, this is over the buildings, and this causes our maps to break. please refrain random edits. happy mapping, have a great day
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:21:15+00:00): Hulp bij het mappen in OpenStreetMap
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:21:28+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:25:42+00:00): MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:26:15+00:00): Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51263699
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:28:37+00:00): Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51263739
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:34:52+00:00): Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51263827
indigomc (2017-09-17 17:17:41+00:00): Why are these things added as points marked 'tourist attraction' and marked in capitals?
indigomc (2017-09-25 17:19:00+00:00): Barlanki, there is no doubt useful info here, but we cannot let it remain in this form. Please respond as to how these things should be marked in accordance with OSM guidelines. This also applies to your later changesets. Thanks.
indigomc (2017-09-28 17:04:29+00:00): Deleted; none seems to be any use to the general map user.
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:36:47+00:00): Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51263874
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:40:31+00:00): Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51263930
wille (2017-08-18 13:17:45+00:00): Olá, realkaka

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap!

Nas duas edições que você realizou ontem você deletou ruas que já estavam traçadas para traçá-las novamente. Isso não é algo que estimulamos, por desvalorizar o trabalho de outro mapeador e por perder todo o histórico de contribuição em um local. Por favor, não repita esse procedimento.

Muito obrigado pelas contribuições. Você adicionou informações muito relevantes.

Obrigado,
realkaka (2017-08-19 16:00:53+00:00): Olá, wille
Estou tentando desfazer as duplicatas que o outro editor está fazendo, além de apagar algumas ruas, como a da prefeitura, mas agora vou aguardar ele terminar de fazer os "testes" para corrigir partes.
wille (2017-08-21 08:58:32+00:00): Legal!

Eu falei com o outro editor que duplicou algumas ruas. Ele falou que não era teste: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51210673

Assim, acredito que você já pode corrigir se tiver disponibilidade.

Obrigado!
Abraços,
realkaka (2017-08-21 19:37:02+00:00): Tranquilo wille, estou refazendo a cidade no JOSM, mais tarde eu faço o upload.
BeKri (2017-08-17 14:23:52+00:00): Servus,
irgwie ist da jetzt aber was "kaputt gegangen ..
Gemäß https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/liste/boundarypostcode
ist jetzt ein PLZ Boundery zerschossen
user_177389 (2017-08-17 15:37:04+00:00): kaputt gegangen:
2017-08-16T19:03:19Z
gesehen in OSMsuspects:
2017-08-16T20:43:02Z
repariert:
2017-08-17T05:31:15Z
Alles gut. :o)
BeKri (2017-08-17 16:43:19+00:00): Ok sorry,
dann bin ich in die Delay-Falle von OSMsuspects reingefallen,
der macht halt erst nachher um ca. 20:45 reinen Tisch ;-(
Nix für ungut
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:32:23+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/51194350
MissingCSAA (2017-08-17 17:56:15+00:00): If you want to invent names for roads, pull out a paper map and neatly write on it. Don't play make believe with a reference material.
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:13:36+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:18:21+00:00): Uw poi/note is voor de hele wereld zichtbaar. Bedenk dat OSM niet bedoeld is voor persoonlijke poi's.
Ik heb inmiddels de naam verwijderd.
Ik zie dat je de woning ook wat groter gemaakt hebt. De BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) in het Kadaster is deze info (nog) niet bekend.
Mocht je willen kun je dit melden.
Doe dit via deze link en gebruik het potlootje aan de rechterzijde bij pand.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=14%20Pastoor%20van%20Haarenstraat%20Veghel&resultOffset=0&objectId=0860200000008313&geometry.x=168221.84328125&geometry.y=404830.93015625&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0860010000007792
Hb- (2020-02-09 11:52:55+00:00): With this edit a landuse=forest and a natural=wood was placed on the same part of the Jinjera Hill – By the same mapper who mapped the other forest two week earlier :-)
Please check your work before uploading and delete the double tagged parts.
Warin61 (2020-02-09 23:09:27+00:00): 
Corrected, and added more deatil to tree area. Thanks.
Jonathan Masur (2018-01-04 12:07:40+00:00): Bitte nur die Hauptstrassen mit Nummer 1-30 mit "highway=primary" taggen. Sehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:10:28+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:11:39+00:00): Het is me onduidelijk wat je met deze changeset bedoelde.
Goed dat je deze zelf ook weer hebt verwijderd.
aceman444 (2021-04-18 00:44:40+00:00): Hi, please pay attention when adding the road surfaces.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357326705 definitely isn't asphalt, but sett.
Adityo (2017-08-22 09:30:05+00:00): Halo, tolong jaringan jalannya di digitasi juga ya. Terima kasih
TheOutpost (2017-08-18 03:52:15+00:00): How did you find all these paths to connect?
jogger333 (2017-08-18 10:44:20+00:00): There is a great database of openstreetmap errors on https://www.keepright.at/ and I built a little web tool on top of it to quickly go through the errors. It is super addictive and I currently try to release it to the public. Send me a PM if you like to try it out - it isn't public-ready yet because you need to understand what happens to not mess up the road network ;-)
maraf24 (2017-11-11 11:40:20+00:00): Dlaczego kopiujesz nazwy polskie do name:pl? W Polsce nazwa polska jest w name i nie ma potrzeby tworzenia duplikatów.
Jeszcze bym to zrozumiał w przypadku miejscowości, ale dowolne obiekty?
wmyrda (2017-11-11 12:46:32+00:00): korzystam z name:pl. Przydaje się przy tworzeniu polskiej wersji mapy
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-02-15 09:33:48+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1300748 ?
Graf Westerholt (2017-10-31 08:01:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3307404411

Hast du hier bei opening_hours das PH vergessen?
wolfbert (2026-03-24 15:08:31+00:00): footway=sidewalk an der St. Pöltner-Straße gilt nur für separat gemappte Wege. Besser hier sidewalk=*.
wolfbert (2026-03-24 15:14:04+00:00): sidewalk=sidewalk ist auch nicht hilfreich.
daknuett (2025-03-02 09:23:26+00:00): Is this meaningful data? It just looks like a bunch of straight lines.
Matjazz (2025-03-10 14:19:59+00:00): Its names of landscape areas and I used "valley" and "ridge" feature. I used straight lines because at that time mapsforge didn't render text along curved lines well.
ajashton (2017-08-17 15:25:54+00:00): Hi - it looks like your edit of the KeyBank Center traces the Bing imagery a bit too literally. Compare with the Digital Globe or Mapbox layers to see that the Bing imagery has some significant perspective distortion, The previous shape was fine.
Adityo (2017-08-22 09:30:18+00:00): Halo, tolong jaringan jalannya di digitasi juga ya. Terima kasih
trigpoint (2023-01-08 23:51:17+00:00): Bore Da
What sources did you use to determine the location or existence of this memorial? Did you survey it.

Seems odd to be missing from both wikidata and geograph.

Diolch Phil
uebelhacker (2023-01-10 13:36:13+00:00): Hi Diolch Phil, I was surveying and copied the inscriptions. Best, Sven.
Yury Yatsynovich (2018-04-26 01:27:10+00:00): Why have you elevated the local road H2126 from tertiary to primary? If this has been done for navigation purposes then the preferable way is by using tags surface, max_speed, hgv=no and so on. Usually, roads of "Н"-class in Belarus are classified as tertiary, while "Р"-class as primary. Class can be increased by at most 1 level -- i.e. "H"-road can be at most tagged as highway=secondary
Jay May (2018-04-26 08:27:59+00:00): Hi. I made this change a long, long time ago, and yes. It is for navigational purposes. Why? Because no matter what max_speed, hgv etc.you mark, openstreetmap and OSM-based apps like maps.me always choose the "superior" road, right through the city center. There are lots of similar cases in Belarus where bypasses have still got lower numbers (НXXXX) than roads leading right through the city center (РXXX or even МXX). 
I do understand fully your point, but is neither your fault, neither my fault if the Belarusian government does nothing to sort that out. To me and several other people we should reflect the reality (= it is better to drive through those НXXXX bypasses than through those РXXX streets). 
Please do not revert these changes as long as the problem I mentioned above will exist.
mueschel (2017-08-26 18:12:18+00:00): Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM!
Bitte schau mal hier im Wiki nach, wie Ladestationen üblicherweise getagged werden - das muss konsistent sein, damit Anwendungen mit den Informationen etwas anfangen können.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich gerne im Forum, da wird immer schnell geholfen!
Gruß, Jan
eggie (2017-10-17 11:55:52+00:00): Mogen (bronm-)fietsers hier wel tegen het verkeer in? Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-10-17 11:50:07+00:00): Zijn (brom-) fietsers uitgezonderd van eenrichting.
Dan dient toegevoegd te worden oneway:bicycle=no  en oneway:moped=no
Kun je dit zelf checken en evt. veranderen? graag reactie.
Luzandro (2020-01-25 07:04:05+00:00): Hallo Anna,

ich glaube das left/right beim cycleway ist vertauscht. Wenn die Einbahn Richtung Hauptplatz verläuft, müsste die opposite_lane cycleway:left und nicht right sein.

LG Andreas
Self-Perfection (2017-08-18 18:34:56+00:00): Обрисовывать фото с коптера - круто.

Ещё круто было бы в комментарии пакета указывать URL на фото. Ну то есть идеологически правильно, но не уверен, что целесообразно по трудозатратам.
mueschel (2017-08-19 14:15:00+00:00): Hallo,
ich kann im "Gästebrief" den du als Quelle angibst, keinen Hinweis zu einer Lizenz erkennen, der es erlaubt die Daten in OSM zu übernehmen. Hast du da eine schriftliche Erlaubnis? 
Gruß, Jan
GerdP (2017-09-04 08:26:22+00:00): Hi!
Please review  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516361090
I assume it is a highway=footway + bridge=yes
I also suggest to connect the footways / steps with the platform ways.
When you draw footways inside a building please use tunnel=building_passage or highway=corridor.
Supaplex (2017-10-01 18:42:23+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Tomas Straupis (2017-08-17 12:55:07+00:00): Neteisingai nuimtos žymos amenity=kindergarten. Vien building=kindergarten žyma reiškia tiesiog darželio tipo pastatus.
Fazu (2018-09-26 13:03:34+00:00): Szia Térképszerkesztő! Honnan jött Békásmegyeren a Wrabel Sándor utca elnevezés a Nád utca lecserélésére? Ugyanis
1) forrást nem adtál meg hozzá;
2) a Főváros hivatalos közterületnév-jegyzéke 2017. év végén ilyet nem ismert;
3) fővárosi 2018-as határozatok között sem találtam erre utalást.
Fazu
Térképszerkesztő (2018-09-26 13:37:11+00:00): Szia Fazu!
Egy 2015.01.19-i keltezésű előterjesztésben olvastam, ami a következő linken érhető el:
http://infoszab.budapest.hu:8080/akl/tva/Tir.aspx?scope=kozgyules&sessionid=6643&agendaitemid=87926
Térképszerkesztő
Fazu (2018-09-29 14:22:14+00:00): Szia Térképszerkesztő! Szerintem benézted, mert az az előterjesztés vsz. nem került szavazásra, ugyanis határozat sincs róla. A Nád utca átnevezésén felül volt abban a csomagban még más is (pl. Esti Kornél utca elnevezés), amit 2015. áprilisban az 553-as Közgy. határozatban elfogadtak, viszont ekkor már nyoma sincs a Nád utca átnevezésének - ez vsz. időközben kikerült. Szóval szerintem vissza kéne állítani Nád utcára, mert a Wrabel Sándor utcáról döntés nem született. Ha nem fogadod el az észrevételt, megkérdezem az illetékes fővárosi előadó hölgyet, aki ezekkel (közterületnevek nyilvántartása) foglalkozik, az ő véleményét azonban perdöntőnek gondolom.
Térképszerkesztő (2018-10-03 09:57:46+00:00): Szia!
Rendben, visszaállítottam.
Köszönöm az észrevételed!
Warin61 (2017-08-18 23:47:35+00:00): The relationship inner way  touches the outer way ... that is not allowed. 

 Is the wood not part of the park? 
Yes.. That would mean that it is not an 'inner' in the relationship and the relationship becomes a one member relationship that can be replaced by putting the tags on the outer way. 

No? .. then the outer way should be changed to not include the wood. And again - would mean there is no 'inner' in the relationship and the relationship becomes a one member relationship that can be replaced by putting the tags on the outer way.
jonorossi (2017-08-19 07:09:44+00:00): Thanks Warin61, I spent a good 30mins reading the wiki because I wasn't sure I was doing things right but couldn't really find the info I was after, I then came across OSMI to see if it reported anything and I realised it is batch updated, so fixed some other local problems.

Sorry I don't quite follow your description, I think the answer is "no". This park is half cleared, clear across the north and bushland in the south but as far as I can see on the ground is all designated as part of the council park.

This isn't the first time I've come across this situation but in the past just not modelled it. Would I just move the inner wood area just inside the west and south boundaries, or remove the relationship and OSM knows how to work out the Z order based on tags like it does for the dog park in there for example?

Cheers, Jono
jonorossi (2017-08-19 14:47:35+00:00): I've resolved the problem. I missed the sign naming the bushland Windemere Road Bushland Refuge, so have now separated the two areas.

I'd still be interested to get a response for my previous question for next time.
Warin61 (2017-08-20 00:22:53+00:00): In a relation ;

An outer way cannot touch nor cross any other way in the relation. 

An inner way can touch another inner way (sometimes OSMi reports this as an error .. but it is technically allowed). 

That help? 
If you can avoid using a relation - that makes things easier/simpler.
jonorossi (2017-08-20 10:28:26+00:00): Apoligies for not being clearer, I understand the inner way not touching the outer now, I saw this one reported in OSMi. I was confused earlier because you said "...by putting the tags on the outer way" for both, however natural=wood needs to be on the inner way.
Warin61 (2017-08-20 11:13:40+00:00): No need for apologies. Some, at least, is my fault! Much easier over a beer. 

What I meant was if the relationship is deleted leaving simple ways, then the remaining way/s get the relevant tags from the old relationship. 

If the wood is part of the park then it gets included in the park - it would not be an inner (inners are excluded from the park). The playground is part of the park?  So it is not an inner in the parks relationship. 

As it now appears - the wood in not part of the park. The park boundaries could exclude the wood so you would not need to have the wood mentioned in the relationship.
jonorossi (2017-08-20 11:44:39+00:00): Cheers (with a virtual beer), I think I understand now. For example, you'd use an inner relationship if there was a residential area in the middle of a national park, since it wouldn't actually be national park. All those multiploygon nature reserves with relationships that were automatically imported into SE QLD about 6 months ago really confused me and really get in the way. The more OSM editing I do the more I realise how much I don't know about tagging.
nevw (2017-08-21 13:21:15+00:00): There is a lot to learn about relations and after getting a good understanding of those, you will find most of the rest is much easier.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon/validity
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples
jonorossi (2017-08-21 14:02:23+00:00): Thanks nevw, I've seen your username on those complex multipolygons at Nerang Forest before.
nevw (2017-08-21 16:39:11+00:00): Yes, guilty :)
Most are from CAPAD data and I prefer to add in the form they are gazetted. The parts where they share segments with nearby areas can be difficult to sort out.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-02-15 10:24:02+00:00): Hallo Step1971,
Du hast einige Gebäude als landuse=farmyard statt building=* gemappt. Die Änderungen sind schon älter, aber vorsichtshalber wollte ich darauf hinweisen. :-)
Gruß Roger Wilco
GerdP (2017-08-23 13:28:19+00:00): Hi!
please review typo highway=footpath
on two ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194442997
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43520756
mot_tom (2017-08-23 20:03:07+00:00): D'oh! Thanks for that, I've edited them both to highway=footway as they should be
DD1GJ (2017-08-17 14:49:10+00:00): Hallo yu nus, wie kannst Du anhand einer "systematischen Überprüfung mit Luftbildern" beurteilen, welche Verkehrsbedeutung eine Straße hat? Die hier geänderte B 316 ist als Bundesstraße klassifiziert und ist daher als primary gekennzeichnet. Warum änderst Du sie nach secondary?
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:04:51+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-08-18 09:56:20+00:00): Merci pour cette attention à la qualité - l'aspect des bâtiments est nettement meilleur que ce qu'on a l'habitude de voir au Sénégal. Néanmoins, pourquoi utiliser l'imagerie Bing alors que celle de Digitalglobe Premium est beaucoup plus récente ?
freepi_gus (2017-08-19 12:43:16+00:00): Salut, le choix de l'image est relatif à la tâche http://taches.francophonelibre.org/project/102
J'avais fait quelques vérif à la périphérie de la zone résidentielle où il semblait que des bâtiments en cours de construction sur DG Premium était terminé sur Bing. Mais suite à ton message j'ai revérifié autre part et j'ai constaté l'inverse et DG semble en effet plus récente. As-tu une source autre que l'observation visuelle pour affirmer que DG est bien plus récente ? auquel cas il serait pertinent de modifier la tâche #102 qui n'est pas très avancée pour indiquer d'utiliser DG Premium. Par contre il nous faudra gérer un décalage d'imagerie entre Bing et DG et vu qu'il semble n'y avoir qu'une seule trace GPS sur Touba, faut-il adopter un décalage ? Gus
freepi_gus (2017-08-19 12:49:45+00:00): Le décalage pour aller de Bing > DG Premium me semble être environ -5.45;3.59
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-08-19 15:45:51+00:00): Concernant la fraîcheur des images, mon jugement s'appuie sur l'observation des zones en évolution rapide en banlieue de Dakar - la voirie et les bâtiments les plus récents sont sur Digitalglobe.

Concernant le décalage, je ne suis pas certain de quel source est mieux orthorectifiée... J'ai naïvement tendance à faire plus confiance à la plus récente, mais ce n'est pas toujours une bonne idée. A défaut de bornes géodésiques, des relevés GPS soigneux sur place à des points de repères seraient utiles.
freepi_gus (2017-09-05 12:08:37+00:00): Il semble que la nouvelle imagerie ESRI soit plus récente encore, cf cette zone : -17.2718181,14.7854911,-17.270194,14.7866101