piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2021-03-18 12:16:32+00:00): Hallo,
"is_sidepath:of" existiert bis jetzt nicht. Es gibt "is_sidepath" und "is_sidepath_of" .
Supaplex030 (2021-03-18 13:30:14+00:00): Ja, das ist mir bewusst. In der Berliner Verkehrswendegruppe haben wir darüber gelegentlich diskutiert und die Semantik/Schreibweise mit Doppelpunkt erschien uns logischer, um einen "is_sidepath"-Namensraum mit den zentralen Attributen der begleitenden Straße zu eröffnen. Ich habe vor einiger Zeit versucht, mit chriss66 (der das Proposal mal aufgestellt hat) darüber in Austausch zu kommen, aber die Kommunikation war eher zäh. Diskutiert wurde dazu auch auf der Diskussionsseite zum Proposal. Da chriss bisher mit einer Ausnahme der einzige ist, der an ein paar Stellen mit "is_sidepath_of" experimentiert hat, ist es mMn noch nicht "zu spät" dieses Tagging zu optimieren – aber ein breiterer Diskussionsprozess dazu steht noch aus.

Ich finde diesen Ansatz aber sehr spannend, weil er eine Lösung für ein zentrales Problem fürs Routing über separate straßenbegleitende Wege anbietet (nämlich die Zuordnung der zentralen Straßenattribute, Straßentyp und Name), habe das Schema daher hier getestet und würde es mittelfristig gern weiterverfolgen.
rthik007 (2021-03-22 05:11:24+00:00): HI alexiajc, i changed the geometry of this  node 5413455455 based on bing imagery. Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101208478
maraf24 (2022-01-18 16:54:16+00:00): Starą nazwą trzeba było wrzucić do old_name:)
rthik007 (2021-03-19 10:42:19+00:00): Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road WAY: 196803129
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101209162
wireguy (2021-03-17 20:30:46+00:00): Try to add the corner points more accurately, then press the 'Q' key.  It will square the corners for you.
literan (2021-03-18 13:11:01+00:00): и зачем вы type поменяли здесь? уже откатили
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-09-17 19:55:06+00:00): Some of these villages look deserted. Do you know anything about it?
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-23 03:24:02+00:00): Does this road no longer go through?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101209894
aweech (2021-03-18 15:31:58+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your contribution! I reviewed your edits as requested, and think that they're good. By the way, do you know whether people in Eagle Mountain tend to take the Eagle Mountain Boulevard or Pony Express Parkway to get to Lehi? One of them ought to be ranked as secondary, but I don't know which.
twiclo (2021-03-18 18:21:06+00:00): I would say that Pony Express is used more but I have seen Blvd be faster quite often
praeteritum (2023-07-07 14:02:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138230945.
Pavelfantik (2021-03-19 20:24:35+00:00): какие грандиозные планы. а как же Понемунь, Лидская и Фолюш? Пока что строят в чистом поле на Магистральной, а здесь еще сносить нужно...
4004 (2021-03-19 20:34:26+00:00): ну так planned же.
а в 2022 думаю доберутся, земля подороже
wolfgang8741 (2021-03-17 21:18:11+00:00): How was this determined as unused? Does it no longer exist on the ground - per a survey or is this local knowledge?
brayackmedia (2021-03-17 21:25:46+00:00): I live here, it used to be a trail, but the neighbors discussed it and it crosses multiple instances of private property.
wolfgang8741 (2021-03-18 15:45:26+00:00): Good reason to remove!
brayackmedia (2021-03-18 15:46:50+00:00): Thanks :)
praeteritum (2023-07-02 05:45:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138011458.
s8evq (2021-03-17 19:39:15+00:00): Foutje bij source vermelding. Source was ook GRB voor de naamgeving.
cserpell (2021-03-17 20:18:30+00:00): Hola, es un santuario protegido? Me acuerdo cuando intenté ir por todos lados decía "prohibido el ingreso a las dunas, propiedad privada". Creo que solo se puede acceder desde la caleta al sur.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101210583
GustavoE (2021-03-18 03:30:28+00:00): Efectivamente es un Santuario de la naturaleza desde el 10 de febrero de 2021, fecha en que fue publicado en el Diario Oficial el decreto que declara área protegida a esta zona con diferentes paños de propietarios privados, y que derivan su administración al Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.
cserpell (2021-03-18 12:27:37+00:00): Buenísimo saberlo, muchas gracias!
MxxCon (2021-03-17 23:01:56+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete street name from this building's address?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101210625
barklund (2021-03-18 00:40:54+00:00): I was trying to undo some other faulty edit in StreetComplete and apparently by mistake undid one changeset too many. I will re-add the information. Thanks for noticing!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101210625
JochenOSM (2026-07-24 14:51:21+00:00): Hallo _Pancake_, hier gibt es widersprüchliche name= und name:de= , kannst du das auflösen? siehe auch
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Language-specific_names
wireguy (2021-03-18 14:51:32+00:00): Hi Janelle!   mapbox imagery looks to be better in your area.  You can switch to it by changing the background on the toolbar on the right side of the screen.  Or click the 'B' key.  Then pick Mapbox. 
The pool tagging is correct, but it could be outlined better.  This pool has square corners, if you press the 'Q' key when the pool is selected, it will square the corners for you.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-14 23:52:17+00:00): o nome do bairro é km 5? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8529742497
wolfgang8741 (2021-03-17 21:16:08+00:00): What is your source for this adjustment? There is no clear community garden boundary from Bing aerial imagery.
brayackmedia (2021-03-17 21:24:19+00:00): I live in this neighborhood.
wolfgang8741 (2021-03-18 15:42:37+00:00): Great, there was a conflict with my changeset was applied which I couldn't correct after doing a Tiger review in ID so I wanted to verify before applying your change again. Thanks.
brayackmedia (2021-03-18 15:43:56+00:00): Thanks!
wolfgang8741 (2021-03-18 15:50:26+00:00): Reapplied (or close) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101271861
owiecc (2021-03-17 20:20:19+00:00): I accidentally merged an address node. Fixed in 101212048.
Cafetom (2021-03-25 00:54:52+00:00): Pienso que esta gran vía debió dejarse como "Autopista" ya que cumple con las características de una y son llamadas como tal (Autopista Norte - Autopista Sur).
En Colombia si se usa el elemento Autopista, un claro ejemplo es Barranquilla.
Facalderonm (2021-03-27 00:03:08+00:00): En esta guía para el mapeo en Colombia puede consultar mi afirmación: el tag "motorway" NO se usa en colombia.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia#Motorizadas.
Irma IRM-ED (2021-07-07 06:09:43+00:00): Hi Facalderonm, 
Thanks for your digitation, 
Can you help me to fix it Relation ID: 12454770
can you add "via" information based on mapillary images and Karta view?
Please check https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/12454770
https://is.gd/2FyOQ5
Thanks
whb (2021-03-18 11:27:15+00:00): Guten Tag,

die Informationstafeln und der Grenzstein sind keine Attraktionen.
Bitte zukünftig beachten.
Danke.
Branko Kokanovic (2022-02-27 14:01:19+00:00): Zdravo, vidim da si u prethodnom periodu lepo radio na prevozu po Beogradu. U ovoj konkretnoj izmeni si dodao novu stanicu (kako i treba za liniju 67). Pogledaj i sajt https://ptna.openstreetmap.de - tu ces naci najnoviji dostupan GTFS koji daje grad, kao i OSM izmene. To moze da ti koristi da uporedis sta je poslednje objavljeno i sta je stvarno stanje u OSM-u:) Sajt nije lagan za koriscenje, ali ima u njemu svega. Cimaj ako ti treba pomoc i hvala sto popravljas prevoz!
maraf24 (2022-11-23 11:15:18+00:00): Są wątpliwości co do oznaczenia bram i furtek. Czy byłeś na tym osiedlu osobiście?
Rzezimierz (2022-11-23 12:09:49+00:00): Hmm, bywam codziennie od ostatnich 4 lat. Osobiście przed chwilą sprawdziłem, wszystkie oznaczenia klatek w Punkcie Piękna są poprawne. Jakiego typu są to wątpliwości?
maraf24 (2022-11-23 18:34:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3446622
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3446621
Rzezimierz (2022-12-04 08:43:01+00:00): Okej, poprawiłem wejścia przez bramki od strony Pięknej - osiedle jest zamknięte (niestety).
sanchi (2021-03-22 21:41:58+00:00): Buenas.
Ten cuidado has subido lo mismo 2 veces. Te he borrado uno de los conjuntos de cambios. Además están todos los edificios mal etiquetados. La etiqueta building=casa no existe. Tienes mas información en la wiki sobre los multiples posibles valores de building
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:building
Si no sabes que tipo de edificio es pon building=yes

Algún edificio se cruzaba con lo ya existente. Hay que tener en cuenta lo que ya hay y corregirlo si es necesario antes de añadir la nueva información.

Lo gordo te lo he corregido rápido. Cualquier duda pregunta sin problema.
Saludos.
EBarcenilla (2021-03-23 10:54:43+00:00): Muchas gracias!! 
Estoy empezando con las ediciones en OSM y se agradecen los comentarios con correcciones! 

Un saludo.
Allison P (2021-03-18 00:23:36+00:00): Seems like 3622 South Antler Ridge Avenue got duplicated. Additionally, the address nodes were added to the outline of the building without the tags being fixed. I went ahead and fixed it. For the future, there are two main ways of tagging addresses: individual nodes on top of a building, or added to the building itself. For detached homes, the latter is preferred. Thanks for adding these footprints! Also, since the roof corners are right angles, so make sure to press Q to orthogonalize the shape after drawing.
MarciH (2021-03-18 15:39:52+00:00): Did I do something wrong with the visibility? I don't see the building outlines unless I zoom in.
Allison P (2021-03-18 16:46:00+00:00): Tiles at zoom level 13+ update minutely, but your computer caches tiles to save data. To clear the tile cache of all tiles on screen at the current zoom level, hold shift and refresh the page. Check the message I sent you— it should explain this.
MarciH (2021-03-18 16:55:07+00:00): That worked. Thanks.
So, should I be entering the address when I outline the building? I see there is already an address point there.
praeteritum (2023-07-01 19:52:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138004114.
highflyer74 (2021-05-07 11:43:51+00:00): Ich muss mich nochmal melden. Beim Durchsehen von Geometriefehlern stieß ich auf eine weitere Relation, die von Dir erstellt wurde, obwohl keine nötig ist. Es handelt sich um diese Sportplätze (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.76003&lat=52.74276&zoom=18).

Ich passe das entsprechend an. Mich würde interessieren, wie diese Fehler entstehen. Liegt evtl. ein Missverständnis vor, oder trägt der Editor "iD" dazu bei? Vielleicht kannst Du mir da weiterhelfen. Viele Grüße!
NGL-engel (2021-06-01 12:08:17+00:00): Hallo highflyer74, 
    im Augenblick verstehe ich noch nicht ganz was den Fehler verursacht. Ich schaue es mir mal genauer an, und melde mich dann noch einmal.
Gruß NGL-engel
NGL-engel (2021-06-02 19:27:32+00:00): Hallo highflyer74,
 ich danke Dir für Deine Nachbearbeitung.

    Warum es allerdings nicht richtig war kann ich dir wirklich nicht sagen. Ein Fehler wurde mir beim Hochladen nicht angezeigt, ich vermute deshalb das es mit meinem Editor zusammenhängt. 
Wäre nett wenn Du mich, wenn du auf ein ähnliches Problem stößt, wieder anschreibst. Eventuell kann ich dann langsam der Fehler "einkreisen".
Gruß NGL-enge
streckenkundler (2021-06-03 09:31:35+00:00): Hallo zusammen,

ich beobachte seit geraumer Zeit, daß iD von sich aus Relationen anlegt, wo keine nötig sind und der Nutzer es nicht merkt. z.B. aus einer Fläche eine Relation mit 2 outern zu machen. 
 Da ich nicht mit iD arbeite, kann ich dazu auch nichts sagen, wie das genau passiert. Ich vermute, daß in bestimmten Konstellationen gerne ein Stützpunkt beteiligt ist, an dem sich z.B. zwei Landuses treffen oder Landuse am highway klebt...
iD hat auch die unangenehme Eigenschaft, gerne mal Relationselemente falsch umzusortieren. Das hatten wir im Forum schon mal angerissen, vielleicht sollte das dort mal vertieft werden...

Sven
NGL-engel (2021-06-16 12:22:20+00:00): Hallo Sven, 
    das stimmt. sobald ich z.B. eine Fläche teile legt iD von selbst eine Relationen an. Falls man das anders lösen kann, war ich dem Programmierer sehr dankbar. 
Gruß NGL-engel
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-23 03:22:43+00:00): This way might need to be split.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101213979
Túllio (2023-03-29 14:06:18+00:00): O que seria "Linha: Área central Vicente Pires (747963989)" ? Não entendi pois não aparenta representar bem o SHVP
dmfr (2026-07-07 23:37:46+00:00): Olá! A https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400316951 não devia estar como highway=primary_link, da mesma forma que a estrada do outro lado desta estação de metro?
Alexmol (2026-07-08 13:42:22+00:00): Olá, provavelmente sim. Não sou especialista em tipos de estradas, tenho sempre de ir ler a wiki. 

Pode alterar, pelo menos fica uniforme.

Alexandre
trial (2022-11-06 13:54:46+00:00): Salut, man_made=bridge c'est pour le contour du pont. Le Pont de Recouvrance, c'est 1 pont, pas 2 passerelles piétonnes que tu as déjà décrites précédemment : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318964635 (dont seule une partie est movable).
Gnafron (2022-11-06 14:20:06+00:00): Salut,
Sauf erreur de ma part, je n'ai fait que toucher à la géométrie, en renseignant les placettes adjacentes. Je ne suis pas à l'origine de ces attributs. Mais merci pour l'info quand même !
trial (2022-11-06 14:34:01+00:00): C'est vrai que j'ai oublié de regarder l'historique, commme tu étais le dernier auteur des objets regardés. Promis je vais essayer de penser à regarder l'historique plus systématiquement.
SomeoneElse (2022-12-22 23:29:33+00:00): Hello,
I'm guessing that "tand_up_bench" should be "stand_up_bench" here?
Cheers,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-12-22 23:29:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suppose que "tand_up_bench" devrait être "stand_up_bench" ici ?
À votre santé,
Andy
rah_em (2021-03-24 06:48:05+00:00): Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214479
letihu (2021-03-20 22:22:24+00:00): Steht dieser Baum
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5239841285/history#map=19/53.57237/9.96892
jetzt in diesem 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918451649/history
Gebäude?
hauke-stieler (2021-03-21 08:45:30+00:00): Gut aufgepasst, steht er natürlich nicht :D
Hab ihn entfernt.
letihu (2021-03-22 16:28:48+00:00): Osmose wars ;-)
Das Tool findet viele Fehler.
rah_em (2021-03-24 06:28:20+00:00): Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214584
rah_em (2021-03-24 06:27:37+00:00): Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991 for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214620
eggie (2021-03-18 07:00:34+00:00): Dag Spier.. Hier kun je de adresmutaties checken en evt. de nieuwe adresnodes laten importeren via het forum.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=hoogstraat%20179%20rotter&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=&objectId=0599100000700406&geometry.x=92892.69&geometry.y=437312.62899978&zoomlevel=7

MVG
eggie
Spier (2021-03-19 15:59:06+00:00): Bedankt voor de info. gaat import altijd via het forum?
Gr. Spier
eggie (2021-03-19 16:08:15+00:00): Yep..

. behalve als je tzt zelf kunt importeren.
Dan wel ervaring opdoen met josm.
Ervaren medemappers die dat kunnen doen dat op verzoek.

Gr eggie
rah_em (2021-03-24 04:55:52+00:00): Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214727
rah_em (2021-03-24 04:55:52+00:00): "Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214727
rah_em (2021-03-24 04:55:53+00:00): Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214727
rah_em (2021-03-24 07:47:24+00:00): Hi Rob,

Trusting you are doing well!

I request you  to ignore the same comment for multiple times. This was completely unintentional. Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214727
rah_em (2021-03-24 04:50:53+00:00): "Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991 for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214848
rah_em (2021-03-23 10:25:28+00:00): Hi VLD175 
I have added connectivity for the isolated  way 918453804.
kindly refer the changeset below
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101565011
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214896
Jeff Underwood (2021-03-24 17:15:40+00:00): Hi rah_em,

Thanks for your contributions to this area. 

We are actively working to add roads here using a grid based project so over time these floating ways will be resolved by our team as we complete additional task squares. Feel free to fill them in still, but we will address them ourselves as well.


Happy Mapping!
-Jeff
rah_em (2021-03-24 04:44:25+00:00): "Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214917
rah_em (2021-03-24 04:43:40+00:00): "Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101214995
rah_em (2021-03-24 04:37:37+00:00): Hi VLD171
I have provided connectivity from node 8555735858  to node 8526276991for all the ways below
way 918459075
way 918451357
way 918752769
way 918459076
way 918454443
way 918451359
way 918451969
way 918453838
way 918755208
way 918026117
way 918752451
way 918453601 which are floating.
kindly refer the changeset below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101609585
thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101215049
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-28 08:34:08+00:00): Can you link where this import was discussed?

Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-29 15:59:12+00:00): As you are not responding, edited after I made this comment and you were even already blocked for imports violating rules (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2312) I will revert this changeset and start reviewing other imports.
eggie (2021-03-18 06:57:12+00:00): Dag Spier.. Lijkt me oke. 
De gebouwen die gesloopt worden kun je tzt verwijderen en de nieuwbouw kun je versneld  laten importeren via het forum van OSM door een verzoek te doen in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Dit zodra er daadwerkelijk wordt gebouwd. 
MVG
eggie
Spier (2021-03-19 15:54:58+00:00): Bedankt eggie, wordt die import met BAG min of meer centraal gedaan?
eggie (2021-03-19 16:04:34+00:00): De taken zijn zo verdeeld... 
Een aantal medemappers heeft zich gespecialiseerd in Bag import.
Ze werken met een speciale plugin die in editor josm draait.
Op verzoek wordt gewoon geïmporteerd.

 Ieder die genoeg ervaring heeft met josm kan in overleg de plugin ook gebruiken. 
In het draadje wie wat waar op het forum zie je wat ieder zo doet.
Je kunt jezelf ook toevoegen.
Mvg
Eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-29 16:05:40+00:00): Reverted as made in violation of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines 

You were blocked already for making imports without discussion, please stop doing it again.

Note that rule breaking imports may be reverted by anyone, at any time, without any reason required beyond "import breaking rules"
Dartmouthmapmaker (2021-03-29 18:55:58+00:00): Trying to delete but jsom will not let me
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-29 19:41:34+00:00): Because I deleted them already.
habi (2022-08-16 16:02:26+00:00): In this changeset you've added several buildings with duplicate names and a suffix (e.g. Name; Name (Eku)).
Can you tell us the reason for this?
PhysicsArmature (2022-08-17 02:49:46+00:00): As it was, "Closed over 1 year ago" I am not able to provide any insight into why I did what I did. I am thankful for your correction. Eku probably referred to Eastern Kentucky University. I have no idea why that happened. Oops :(
habi (2022-08-17 08:22:45+00:00): EKU is already nicely mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11797635
habi (2022-08-17 08:52:03+00:00): I've removed the duplicate names in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125006245 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125006553
Happy mapping!