piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-10-13 22:27:57+00:00): Hi,
Sorry I missed your response to this three months ago somehow. I keep expecting changeset comments to appear in the OSM web notifications like direct messages do, but I don't think the website does this.

To be clear, tagging official_ref in this way was not an original interpretation of mine - I based the way I mapped these on routes around Pittsburgh where the signed and unsigned portions had different relations in a master relation for example. (Not sure if any of those have changed since I last looked, but was the situation when I made these edits originally.) I assumed that this was already a consensus as it had been done elsewhere and seemed to be part of the intent behind the US route tagging proposal which was approved on the mailing list and wiki over the summer (admittedly it's been a while since then and I don't remember exactly if tagging ref on ways was explicitly addressed in the proposal, but I took it to be part of a shift in standardizing road route tagging on relations rather than on ways).

This could be discussed further, probably on the Community Discussion forum if the current proposal about that goes through, although to be honest my priorities at the moment are more focused on mapping things other than road routes so this is not something I feel too strongly on either way at the moment. It's not that I think the lack of signage makes a route nil, just that it seems inconsistent with the distinction between the purpose of a route relation as opposed to tags on the way itself. By analogy with other I think it is more like the formerly common practice of including is_in:country=(place) on nodes. I misjudged whether or not this was already established though.

(FWIW, I am a regular 311 user - I get responses to about 1 in 100 requests and I mainly only report about issues more directly related to safety/quality of life. If I started reporting signage issues I would have no time for much else!)
ovruni (2022-05-06 01:57:39+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han retirado algunos prefijos en pasajes. Estos prefijos forman parte del nombre, por lo que los he recuperado.
Saludos
obache (2022-05-16 01:53:51+00:00): Please consider adjusting Bing Maps Aerial. position to current OSM and edit POI, instead of  moving  POI positions based on Bing Maps Aerial. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps#Precision

Many geometical mismatches happened.
For example, you just moved waterways, but not boundary:administrative, whereas they should be the same way (boundary:administrative should be based on official geometric data, so moved waterway position is wrong).
user_5359 (2022-05-06 05:34:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The key "building:levels" counts the level of a building above the ground. It is therefore a number. Please check the given value.
Daughter Of Sappho (2022-05-06 05:40:41+00:00): ah i see. thanks. i wasn't sure what that meant. i assumed it was for grades taught. thanks so much for helping.
martien-176 (2022-05-22 08:47:41+00:00): Hi John, welcome to HOTOSM. You requested a review of your mappings.

Well mapped, but as to the square buildings please square them after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. Also take care not to let them having shared nodes with other buildings.

So keep up the mapping - many thanks!

Kind regards, Martien, global validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120610514
emersonveenstra (2022-05-10 00:48:48+00:00): Hi,

This changeset added a few trees that are on top of a building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9719590228 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9719590229 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9719590203) If they were mistakes, could you please move/remove them, or if they weren't, could you please make sure you add the appropriate tags for indoor? Thanks!
archpdx (2022-05-06 05:10:13+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStretMap! Are you sure that https://osm.org/way/1057784424 is a wetland area? It looks like this is a parking lot based on aerial imagery.
SaltWaterBill (2022-05-06 05:16:46+00:00): Yes, the area marks the trailhead where you can park. It is the only access point for the wetland. You can see the boardwalk was added to the 50 acre wetland. The end of the boardwalk has the largest Western Red Cedar tree, estimated at 900 years old. The boardwalk is ADA compliant for wheelchairs and strollers. Previous map references indicated Island St as and access point. That is now closed as it was just a local (and muddy) trail.
SaltWaterBill (2022-05-06 05:22:36+00:00): There is a very rugged trail, almost impassable from So. Dolphin St that should be removed. The trail starting at the Big Cedar and loops back to the boardwalk split is OK but is unimproved and often muddy.
SaltWaterBill (2022-05-06 05:24:52+00:00): I'm creating another area that shows the boundary of the 50 acre nature preserve.
archpdx (2022-05-06 05:42:25+00:00): Hi again,
Thanks for your prompt response!

>the area marks the trailhead where you can park

This area should be changed to the Parking Lot preset then: `natural=wetland` is only to be used for the wetland itself, see https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:natural=wetland

>There is a very rugged trail, almost impassable from So. Dolphin St that should be removed.

I agree that this should either be removed or changed to the 'Informal Path' preset. The Strava heatmap (https://wiki.osm.org/Strava) doesn't show this path unlike the other ones mapped in this area.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:09:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
impiaaa (2022-05-08 19:44:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! To help your fellow mappers know what changed, we'd appreciate it if you saved your changes in one local area before moving to another area. Thanks!
Lejun (2022-05-09 10:31:29+00:00): Classe, bien joué !
ivanatora (2022-05-07 06:30:11+00:00): Адресът на сградите не трябва да се дублира в name тага.
eggie (2022-05-06 06:00:00+00:00): Dag Maarten.. Adresen en gebouwen zijn import vanuit het Kadaster. Het is niet correct nogmaals een adres toe te voegen aan een gebouw. Er is al een adresnode op het gebouw. 
Bij de camping zelf is het natuurlijk een beetje schipperen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-06 06:53:22+00:00): Het adres heb ik verwijderd...
archpdx (2022-05-06 05:48:38+00:00): Hi,
Please note that we don't use the name tag to describe features in OSM, see:
https://wiki.osm.org/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

As I suggested previously, the 'Informal Path' preset would be appropriate here
archpdx (2022-05-06 05:56:46+00:00): Hi,
Please note that we use `addr:` tags instead of `Street Address` for addresses in OSM, see:
https://wiki.osm.org/Key:addr

You mentioned in a previous changeset that this was a nauture preserve so I recommend tagging this as a Nature Reserve:
https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:leisure=nature_reserve
mavl (2022-05-20 16:09:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:09:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-11 10:34:56+00:00): There are no sidewalks on some sections of Stubbs Road. So much for your "lack of local knowledge".
ftcat (2022-05-08 07:47:29+00:00): Hi Max Berckmueller,
While Lusaka is the provincial admin centre of the Lusaka Province and the admin centre of Lusaka District  it is also the capital of Zambia and so its admin level should be 2. In Zambia admin level 3 is not used, 4 is provincial admin level and 5 is district admin level, while there are further subdivisions in the form of wards these are not mapped as they are more related to political constituencies therefore Zambia has no admin levels above 5
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Mister Kanister (2022-05-09 10:09:22+00:00): Hallo,

wenn Du nicht weisst, wie gross und wo die Tiefgarage tatsächlich ist, dürfte es genügen, nur den Eingang zu taggen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking=underground?uselang=de

wie zum Beispiel hier in Schaan:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1033391132

LG
Moritz
Adam Franco (2022-05-07 00:01:12+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!

I took a look at your changes and it looks like the opening_hours needs a fix to be correctly understood by tools that use OSM data.

I believe that the value you want is:
Mo-Fr 10:00-17:00; Sa 9:00-14:00

The opening_hours specification is a bit complicated (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours ) but this evaluation tool can be helpful for validating the format: 
https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo-Fr%2010%3A00-17%3A00%3B%20Sa%209%3A00-14%3A00

Reply if you have any questions.
Best,
Adam
qaz789 (2024-01-13 16:31:32+00:00): Czy rozjazd rozjazd poniżej w Goleszowie istnieje?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2919139810
Nie widać tam żadnego toru odchodzącego
gurglypipe (2022-05-06 10:59:37+00:00): Hi. If the path is faint, perhaps that could be indicated in the tagging by using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility? That might avoid other editors deleting the path in future because they can’t find it on the ground or don’t think its on-the-ground visibility warrants it being on the map. Just a suggestion :)
Jethro10 (2022-05-07 07:43:11+00:00): Done. Intermediate added to the middle part
parsd51 (2022-05-06 20:55:53+00:00): Hej

Jeg kan se du er begyndt at lægge foreløbige adressepunkter ind. 
Eksempel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9719815359
https://info.dataforsyningen.dk/adgangsadresser/c81634f6-97fa-4afe-ad2c-5752c434041c

De foreløbige adressepunkter kan indeholde “garbage”, så derfor medtager autoAWS dem ikke. Det fik jeg rettet i autoAWS for længe siden.

Det er vigtigt at dem du indlægger vedligeholdes af autoAWS, dvs. ændres til gyldig adresse, rettes?, eller fjernes igen ihht danmarksadresser. Manuelt er det ikke hensigtsmæssigt. Jeg kan ikke se hvordan autoAWS kan undgå at rette til adresse som evt. indeholder “garbage”, medmindre den ikke retter foreløbige.

Hvordan håndteres alt det i autoAWS?
(Jeg går ud fra du checker dataene for fejl og mangler inden du lægger dem ind.)

Hilsen
parsd51
ivanbranco (2022-06-19 18:00:43+00:00): Hi C2oc4,

seems like you added a wikipedia value as wikidata value here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233383578/history

I could fix it myself but I'm not sure since the wikipedia page and the OSM element have different names, could you check it out please?

Good mapping :)
SekeRob (2022-05-09 07:13:06+00:00): Hi

Your entry on OSM is flagged as feature less. It needs a shop or craft key e.g. craft=restorer... Cant find any past samples in system that capture refinishing, no other Mr Sandless.

Let me know
Ciao
SekeRob (2022-05-09 08:49:37+00:00): Hi

To follow up, would craft=refurbisher or reconditioner be any good to you? Your skill has has very few mentions. But, there's always someone who has to be the first on OSM so craft=refinisher which does have a description on the Free Dictionary as "To put a new finish on (furniture)." would be fine with me.

ciao
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-05-07 14:53:33+00:00): Hello, there are no houses on aerial photos here, only a bus stop. Did you mean to put it elsewhere?

https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/etak.php?B=59.40097383642682&L=24.201704984153682&azimuthmin=157.5&azimuthmax=202.5&div=NW&fotoladu
iyukon (2022-05-07 19:08:53+00:00): Bus stop, a little further away, I want to make it more accurate. As for the house, I canceled the edits made by my mistake.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-06 10:03:20+00:00): Šito namo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259704176 adresas yra 25, o ne 38A. Tai arba klaida keičiant adresą, arba viešbutis ne čia.
Lejun (2022-05-09 08:51:31+00:00): Merci de l’information, je me charge de traduire ça selon les standards OpenStreetMap que tu peux retrouver sur le wiki[1].

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Restrictions_conditionnelles
bxl-forever (2022-05-06 23:04:58+00:00): Hello,

Your edit is good, you added "oneway:bicycle=no" which now opens the road in both direction for cyclists.

If you want to add a tag to describe the type of infrastructure for cyclists, I guess the magic tag to add here is:
cycleway:left=lane

(Explanation here: "cycleway" is the family of tags that talk about cycle infrastructure.  We use left or right to tell the direction we are talking about.  It is based on the way the street is drawn in OSM.  In a one-way street, "right" is always with the flow of cars and "left" is the contraflow.)
(A lane with dashed paintings like this === is called "lane" in OSM.  If there are just bicycle logos or just colour but no lanes, we call it "shared_lane".)

Hope that helps.
Happy mapping.
MichaëlVD (2022-05-07 06:44:43+00:00): Thanks for the explanation on the flow/contraflow! I have now added the cycle lane as well.
VictorIE (2024-02-01 08:24:38+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761106465
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154154799

Two building=teahouse (undocumented)

Perhaps:
amenity=cafe
cuisine=teahouse
building=retail ?
b-unicycling (2024-02-01 08:40:41+00:00): They're purpose built as tea houses in the 19th century and both vacant. I guess building=retail would work.
eggie (2022-05-06 08:30:31+00:00): Beste masterhart,

Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot. Het is onduidelijk wat je aan het doen bent of hebt gedaan.
Je commentaar is 'yes'.  
Geef conctreet aan wat je wijzigingen zijn svp.
Schuiven met de kaart on editmodus kan schade geven door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het kadaster en als zodanig ingemeten. Svp niets aan veranderen. Luchtfoto's vertekenen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-06 08:35:22+00:00): reverted by  changeset #120619314 reverted due to changing building import from BAG Wrong interpretation aerial imagery

Comment yes is not clear.

Je edits zijn teruggezet. 
Je hebt talloze gebouwen aangepast door een verkeerde interpretatie van de luchtfoto. 
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust. 

MVG
eggie
Kovoschiz (2022-05-06 13:45:27+00:00): Please don't merge `footway=sidewalk` and delete `name=`. This was supported in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-April/072613.html as seen in https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2986 . It benefits routing, and shows a clear association over spatial proximity.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-06 13:46:38+00:00): Secondarily, it provides a logical point to split them, preventing them from growing to very long that's less easy to load and edit. Potential errors are reduced.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-05-06 08:14:09+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJTUEVFRF9MSU1JVCI6WzAsOTk5XX0%3D&location=32.385298%2C-91.419838%2C15.89
Dimitar155 (2022-05-08 16:11:22+00:00): За имена на мостове следва да се използва bridge:name, а не полето за име на улицата. Виж https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
便携式小朋友 (2022-05-06 08:37:15+00:00): 修正: 76,77路
eggie (2022-05-06 08:37:38+00:00): Hi Masterhart,

Please comment your changeset properly.
This was asked before. 
Greetz,
eggie
BCNorwich (2022-05-06 13:42:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow added a bridge tag to the whole of footpath Way: 575662272 when adding the bridge section. No problem I've removed the tags.

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
plennert (2022-05-30 07:44:40+00:00): Hallo JohnGoodBreed,
wieso hast du das Bild entfernt? Auch wenn es über das Wiki erreichbar ist, ist es doch richtig erfasst. 
Fragende Grüsse
plennert
user_15820375 (2022-05-30 13:53:57+00:00): Hallo, vermutlich weil es auf wosm steht: "Adding wikimedia_commons=* to an object that has wikidata=* can be considered redundant because Wikidata itself often links to Wikimedia Commons." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons) Mir ist es egal, ob etwas überflüssiges drin ist, damals war es mir vermutlich nicht egal. Ich füge es gerne wieder hinzu, wenn du es drin haben willst
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-06 13:38:45+00:00): Can you stop changing HK Tramway Ltd to RATP?
PT-53 (2022-05-07 06:08:15+00:00): Hallo JohnGoodBreed,
bist Du Dir sicher, daß dies
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9720045406/history
das korrekte Zentrum des Hochgeländ ist?
Hast Du entsprechende gute Ortskenntnisse oder was ist die Quelle für Deine Eintragung?
Fragende Grüße
PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
user_15820375 (2022-05-08 12:31:37+00:00): Hi PT-53, 

Nein, das muss absolut nicht das Zentrum sein. Mir war in dem Moment wichtig, dass es überhaupt einen Eintrag für das Hochgeländ gibt. Ich kenne nicht die genauen Grenzen, deshalb ist es auch nur ein einzelner Node geworden. Wikipedia ist die Quelle. 

Liebe Grüße
mavl (2022-05-20 16:08:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:44:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
Shaun das Schaf (2022-05-08 09:10:52+00:00): Hi JohnGoodBreed,

why are you adding all the parts of the river as role "inner" to your relation?

Role "inner" does not make sense to me and it is not documented on the Wiki-page of a waterway-relation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway

Best regards
Shaun das Schaf
user_15820375 (2022-05-08 12:25:34+00:00): Hi Shaun, because I didn't know it better and id wanted a role, so I added a role. From the wiki, I don't get the information about which role would be appropriate.
tenzul (2022-05-06 21:12:17+00:00): Hey mauritz5,

welcome to OSM and thank you for your first contributions. You did a good job, just a small hint: When mapping buildings from satellite images the intuition is to map the shape of the roof. However, instead of doing that, the base of the walls should be traced. Maybe this link is helpfull for you: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling
The position of the roof changes, depending on the angle of the areal photograph. If you switch to  different base layers you can see this effect. So the best layer here is probably "Canton Thurgau Base plan cadastral surveying".

Greetings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120621360
sanch3z (2022-05-06 09:54:00+00:00): Du könntest sie als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction markieren und eine Notiz (note=*) mit dem voraussichtlichen Ende der Bauarbeiten hinterlassen. Für kürzere Bauarbeiten sieh dir bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions an.
guenterbe (2022-05-06 10:22:19+00:00): Vielen Dank
tonyf1 (2022-05-06 12:47:27+00:00): Hi, there is a lot of shared path signage. At Garnett Rd, Wetlands Golf N games, Kevin Wood Bridge to name 3. Please revert this change.
Vadmium (2022-05-07 00:40:58+00:00): Agreed most of the trail from freeway to creek has signs, so highway=cycleway or bicycle=designated is appropriate. Mapillary has shared path signs for the trail section east of Jells Rd, and the section west of the substation driveway.

The short section from the substation to Sir Kenneth Luke Bvd is not designated by signs, but is the logical continuation for someone riding on the shared path. IMO it is not clear by the Vic road rules whether it is a "footpath" [road rules dictionary: one of its main uses is by peds] or "shared path" [rule 242 (2): one of its main uses is by bikes, scooters & peds]. So for this section highway=footway might be reasonable.

However the road crossings at Jells Rd appear to be "pedestrian crossings" (crossing=zebra) and "marked foot crossings" (crossing=traffic_signals) without bike lanterns, so these are definitely not bike crossings.
HighRouleur (2022-05-07 01:24:38+00:00): Thanks Vadmium. This changeset was only intended to capture the non-cycle path West of Sir Kenneth Luke Boulevard along the south side of Wellington Rd as you have pointed out.
HighRouleur (2022-05-07 01:42:14+00:00): Previous changeset 120621671 has been reverted. Corrections discussed above now made under Changeset 120651582
tonyf1 (2022-05-07 06:16:37+00:00): Thanks HighRouleur. I agree with Vadmium, the road crossings at Jells Rd appear to be "pedestrian crossings".  The section from the substation to Sir Kenneth Luke Bvd could be footway or shared.
user_3716049 (2022-05-22 13:02:35+00:00): Hi soemisch,
der Name "Grevenbroich Bahnhof" kann hier nicht stimmen. Ausserdem gibt's denn Fahrrad-Parkplatz noch nicht, da ist noch immer eine Baustelle und im Entwurf ist da auch keiner zu erkennen. Also bitte wieder löschen und den Hinweis abhaken.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3189001

https://www.planergruppe-oberhausen.de/mg-platz-der-republik/
redd (2022-06-12 14:30:55+00:00): Guten Tag,
leider haben Sie scheinbar einen Teil der Bundesstrasse entfernt! Bitte um Korrektur
berndw (2022-06-12 17:18:06+00:00): Hab das Stück Straße wieder eingefügt. 
Lücken in den Routen konnte ich nicht erkennen
rms_SBAB (2022-06-15 08:14:24+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis und Änderung. Ich werde nochmal drüber schauen.
pyram (2022-05-08 11:23:11+00:00): => Revert wegen Lizenzverstoß
Lejun (2022-05-09 09:12:01+00:00): Merci de la contribution. Attention cependant, c’est ici building:part=yes qu’il faut utiliser, on imbrique pas (encore) des bâtiments dans d’autres bâtiments… À moins que ce soit un de ces trucs d’artistes et designers, je sais plus moi.
pyram (2022-05-08 11:20:27+00:00): => Teilrevert
EneaSuper (2022-05-21 11:58:29+00:00): Ciao, stavo revisionando i tuoi lavori, e andando con ordine partirei da qui:

Ho apportato alcune modifiche atte a migliorare e correggere (trovi tutto nei miei ultimi changeset) quanto fatto in questa stazione ferroviaria. Comunque dubito che il binario 2 sia quello centrale, dato che non vedo alcuna banchina, sottopasso, ecc. per potervi accedere e usufruirne di conseguenza. Forse il binario corretto è quello più a sud (lato parcheggio)?