piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
deekpurb (2022-11-02 07:59:57+00:00): Hi,

Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding. Thank you for looking into the change set. We have added access:delivery=no tag based on the driver feedback.We have started adding this tag based on OSM community suggestion. If you are local or going to survey this location please make the appropriate changes or let us know, we would be happy to update the map. For further information, kindly go through this diary post: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jguthula/diary/392437.

Thanks and Regards,
deekpurb
CRCulver (2024-08-13 16:36:40+00:00): Please do not add to houses the names of the families resident therein.
redd (2022-08-01 07:25:20+00:00): Hi salvager,
thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. I hope it is ok for you to react to your changeset in english language!
Is there any reason why you used cold_water=true instead of cold_water=yes?
Maybe you can change this to yes instead of true?
Thanks,
redd
redd (2022-08-01 07:26:57+00:00): it also affects some other drinking water changes from you, see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kCG
maraf24 (2022-07-25 11:15:48+00:00): Tag amenity=drinking_water jest tu błędny, z tego nie da się pić.
salvager (2022-07-29 14:25:16+00:00): jest to jedno "ujęcie" ale zarazem na kompaktowe rozmiary wolałem tego nie rozmieniać na 4 różne featury (mgiełka/fontanna do picia/ujęcie wody do butelki+nalewanie wody dla psów - to ostatnie to jest 2funkcyjna wylewka). Chciałem być pewien że punkt na pewno wyświetli się na nawigacjach nakierowanych na wycieczki/trasy rowerowe. 

Daj znać czy lepiej mgiełkę rozdzielić (bo to prawdopodobnie może mieć inne "miesiące" otwarcia chociażby to łatwiej byłoby później zarządzać)
maraf24 (2022-08-24 18:34:31+00:00): Skoro to jest jeden obiekt fizyczny, to takie otagowanie jest ok.
Z tym że man_made= powinien mieć jedną wartość, takich złączeń prawie nic nie "czyta". Zrozumieć to mógłby overpass, ale musiałbyś wartości pooddzielać śednikiem, a nie przecinkiem.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
WoodWoseWulf (2022-07-26 02:20:38+00:00): Hi there!

It looks like this park is already on the map as an area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31975037

Were you trying to add something in particular?
cartographer2 (2022-07-26 04:13:19+00:00): I was searching for 333 Blossom Hill Rd on the map and came up empty so I thought maybe it wasn't added/entered properly.

Yeah I probably shouldn't have done what I did.  I guess it has been cleaned up/reverted so I don't need to do anything now.

Thanks!
cartographer2 (2022-07-26 04:14:33+00:00): oh one more thing, I wanted to mark the park entry as the official address also.  As is, that part isnt so clear from the map.
cartographer2 (2022-07-26 04:15:04+00:00): entry -> entrance.  sorry!
WoodWoseWulf (2022-07-26 04:36:15+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for the quick response!

It looks like the area also has the address (unless I'm missing a typo) so I'm not sure why it wouldn't show up when searching (though there are a LOT of different Blossom Hill Roads)

The entrance should be implied by the roads going in to the park. If there's special features though, you may be able to tag them differently.

Generally OSM works on the concept of "one feature, one osm element" - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I have removed the park node now, but please feel free to reach out if you need any help :)
Diacritic (2022-07-27 03:17:36+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your contributions in the Footscray/Yarraville area.

It appears as though you're part of a group that's making quite a few changes to the area. Is there someone in charge of your class/club/project that I could get in touch with?

There are a couple of issues with the mapping data being contributed (particularly address tagging) that I'd like to discuss.

Dian Agesson
Diacritic (2022-07-27 03:17:31+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your contributions in the Footscray/Yarraville area.

It appears as though you're part of a group that's making quite a few changes to the area. Is there someone in charge of your class/club/project that I could get in touch with?

There are a couple of issues with the mapping data being contributed (particularly address tagging) that I'd like to discuss.

Dian Agesson
Diacritic (2022-07-27 03:17:22+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your contributions in the Footscray/Yarraville area.

It appears as though you're part of a group that's making quite a few changes to the area. Is there someone in charge of your class/club/project that I could get in touch with?

There are a couple of issues with the mapping data being contributed (particularly address tagging) that I'd like to discuss.

Dian Agesson
Diacritic (2022-07-27 03:15:00+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your contributions in the Footscray/Yarraville area.

It appears as though you're part of a group that's making quite a few changes to the area. Is there someone in charge of your class/club/project that I could get in touch with?

There are a couple of issues with the mapping data being contributed (particularly address tagging) that I'd like to discuss.

Dian Agesson
Diacritic (2022-07-27 03:17:15+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your contributions in the Footscray/Yarraville area.

It appears as though you're part of a group that's making quite a few changes to the area. Is there someone in charge of your class/club/project that I could get in touch with?

There are a couple of issues with the mapping data being contributed (particularly address tagging) that I'd like to discuss.

Dian Agesson
eggie (2022-07-25 06:31:05+00:00): Hi R F

There is a connection for sure, but it's a farmyard!
I tagged additional access=private



No regular routing here!

Greetz,
eggie
gscholz (2022-07-26 05:54:24+00:00): Hi Flepix,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-59.65731&lat=-29.17051&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124031435

As you may know, those ways cannot be used by routing software.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Diacritic (2022-07-27 03:17:01+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for your contributions in the Footscray/Yarraville area.

It appears as though you're part of a group that's making quite a few changes to the area. Is there someone in charge of your class/club/project that I could get in touch with?

There are a couple of issues with the mapping data being contributed (particularly address tagging) that I'd like to discuss.

Dian Agesson
mueschel (2022-07-28 18:49:02+00:00): Hi,
if you find tags like these, they have been added due to a bug in the iD editor. The user most likely just wanted to add "recycling:glass", and no special tag for tempered glass, mirrors, windows etc.
aTarom (2022-07-29 04:51:42+00:00): Hi, do you know where to look for more information about that bug?
Thank you very much for the warning.
mueschel (2022-07-29 07:40:50+00:00): https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9164

Should be fixed in the code, but it seems it didn't make it to the official instance yet.
Sammamish Bike Commuter (2025-08-15 17:38:12+00:00): Thanks for adding this. Unfortunately, this does not appear to block bicycle routing through the fence. I found out the hard way that the fence is still there as of Aug 12, 2025. I would like for myself and others to not find out the hard way. You seem to have done the right thing, added a barrier, why is it still routing bicycle traffic through this blocked bridge?
Dr M0 (2025-08-15 18:21:56+00:00): Just connected the barrier to the trail with additional points, hopefully this makes routing programs avoid the bridge, though i wonder what is the best way to deal with the bridge itself since it is not really collapsed but it is unusable because structural damage.
Natfoot (2026-03-09 17:20:32+00:00): barriers have been present for several years.  I removed the route relation so hopefully it looks less inviting
Frans S (2022-07-31 10:02:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. We appreciate your involvement here, but, please restrict yourself to less complex mappings. Gain yourself experience on easier mappings. This task is more for advanced mappers. 
mappings of buildings should be closed at any time
rhtb0 (2022-08-29 04:28:43+00:00): 안녕하세요
농지 도로는 전부 콘크리트로 포장되어 있는데 지우시는 이유가 무엇인가요?
위성사진에서 보이는 도로에 하얀색이 콘크리트 포장입니다.
bkil (2022-08-06 19:31:00+00:00): Üdvözlet az OSM közösségben! Szeretném felhívni a figyelmet, hogy a létrehozott duplikátumok nem számítanak jó gyakorlatnak. Azaz egy épület maga nem egy posta (egy épületnek lehetnek szintjei, abban lehetnek különféle irodák, stb) amennyiben  abban pontként már fel van véve egy posta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
SekeRob (2022-07-25 06:19:27+00:00): The corrected area near the quarry  has no feature tags and only appears in the BDO imagery, not in any other. Bare ground, bare rock it looks like.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:11:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
tastrax (2022-07-29 02:44:16+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
bxl-forever (2022-07-25 08:44:22+00:00): Hello,

If you want to upgrade the tags on TEC bus routes, please do it in a separate changeset and with an appropriate title.

DON'T mix up such edits with other edits related to addresses on buildings, especially if your changeset description does not say what you are _really_ doing on the map.

Thanks in advance.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:26:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:52:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-07-25 06:58:44+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=35.953461%2C-95.303393%2C16.08
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mtmail (2022-08-15 14:09:34+00:00): addr:postcode enthält '14'. Ist das eventuell eine Hausnummer?
Nadjita (2022-08-16 06:17:18+00:00): Oh ja, danke. Verklickt
georift (2022-07-25 08:33:15+00:00): Oh thanks for this change set. Are these microsoft footprints? Or something you did by hand? :)
Lejun (2022-07-25 09:41:27+00:00): Everything’s handmade through JOSM BuildingsTools’ plugin. There’ll  inconsistencies to check as I’m not australian and building profile is kinda different but overall I think it’s a pretty good draft
georift (2022-07-25 10:32:15+00:00): Thanks for taking the time :) Smashed out a massive chunk of it for me.
SafetyIng (2022-07-27 13:45:01+00:00): Hey, das Gebäude hat von dir ein "disused:building" bekommen.... Aber faktisch ist es ja immernoch als ein solches Gebaut. Denn building beschreibt die Art wie ein Gebäude gebaut wurde. Für die Nutzung gibt es building:use
dbsus (2025-07-24 09:59:36+00:00): Hallo SafetyIng,
danke für den Hinweis,ist angepasst.
Viele Grüße
dbsus
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-25 07:35:28+00:00): this reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124007038
Глеб (2022-12-30 06:25:14+00:00): Вы ломаете маршруты общественного транспорта.
При переносе двигайте точки или переносите роли в отношениях.
gscscnd (2022-07-26 04:43:50+00:00): Is building=commercial no longer valid?
praesertim (2022-07-26 14:19:28+00:00): I'm sorry, it's still a commercial building (but empty) and therefore still valid. I've already fixed it.
pfg21 (2022-07-25 20:28:18+00:00): Зачем такие большие и неточные вливания ??
4004 (2022-07-31 21:56:29+00:00): здравствуйте, Кейт, снова просьба не удалять данные (такие как номера аптек)
Svetlana_rocketdata (2022-08-02 12:28:20+00:00): Добрый день! 
Принято)
kate_rocketdata (2022-08-02 12:29:15+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
Увидела замечание, учту!
4004 (2022-08-02 13:08:45+00:00): спасибо! как вариант, попросите клиента включать эту информацию в их выгрузку
fatemeh ebrahiminik (2022-07-25 07:57:10+00:00): شرکت رایبد انرژی پاژ سازنده ی انواع مونو پمپ با برند پمپ پاژ در ایران
4004 (2022-07-31 21:58:34+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124319861
opendcc (2022-07-25 10:31:48+00:00): building=yes?
ToniE (2022-07-25 10:39:31+00:00): Oops, Blödsinn, weiß nicht wie das reingekommen ist.
DUGA (2025-02-06 03:21:03+00:00): Under what circumstance that you decided to add a building on top of the interstate road?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081090257#map=18/29.773614/-95.239867
bielebog (2025-05-07 06:13:18+00:00): Could you please double-check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081088971 ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:24:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
jogemu (2022-07-25 20:08:14+00:00): Thanks for fixing my typo.
Jorisbo (2022-07-26 07:18:26+00:00): Thx, no problem, kind regards, Joris
trigpoint (2023-01-03 16:40:27+00:00): Mapper has not replied to similar edit and there is no mapillary evidence of such restrictions.

Tags removed.
trigpoint (2023-01-03 16:40:18+00:00): Mapper has not replied to similar edit and there is no mapillary evidence of such restrictions.

Tags removed.
trigpoint (2023-01-03 16:40:07+00:00): Mapper has not replied to similar edit and there is no mapillary evidence of such restrictions.

Tags removed.
R0bst3r (2022-07-27 08:46:30+00:00): Hallo lexus1234,
willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast für deine Änderung den ID Editor verwendet, er kennt Überwachungskameras als Vorlage (oben links), damit brauchst du keine eigenen Definitionen ergänzen. Ansonsten stheht hier wie es richtig sein sollte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance
Viele Grüße
R0bst3r
Frans S (2022-08-26 15:06:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124039758
Frans S (2022-08-26 15:07:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124039758
Mammi71 (2022-07-25 11:36:30+00:00): Hallo AndySchulte,
Du hast hier aus dem Schlossberg teilweise eine Fußgängerzone gemacht. Dies ist jedoch falsch! Wie man diesem Beitrag (https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/Wenn-der-Navi-in-die-Sackgasse-fuehrt,navi152.html#grenzuebergang198) entnehmen kann, ist der Weg und der Grenzübergang für Fußgänger UND Radfahrer. In der Bilderstrecke zu vorgenanntem beitrag gibt es auch ein bild mit samt Verkehrszeichen 240 und es führen Radrouten über diesen Weg.
Da Du zwei Wegabschnitte entsprechend geändert hast, muss ich davon ausgehen, dass das kein Versehen war, sondern mappen für den Router.
Richtig wäre highway=path; bicycle=designated und foot=designated. Und dann könnte - wenn Du dann eh dabei bist - gleich das motor_vehicle wieder raus bzw. durch vehicle=no ersetzt werden, weil Pferdefuhrwerke dürfen/können da auch nicht langfahren.
AndySchulte (2022-07-25 13:12:19+00:00): Hallo Mammi71,

danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe es entsprechend angepasst.

Gruß Andy
Mammi71 (2022-07-25 13:37:23+00:00): Danke für das Korrigieren
whb (2022-07-25 13:53:07+00:00): @AndySchulte
Bei "ehicle" fehlt das "v":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34016709/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080819110/history
AndySchulte (2022-07-25 16:13:43+00:00): Hallo Mammi71
Hallo whb,

@Mammi71, gern, Danke noch mal für den Hinweis!

@whb, auch die vielen Dank für den Hinweis.

Gruß Andy
literan (2022-07-25 17:28:44+00:00): как-то у вас получилось, что улица по водной глади проходит. Так быть не должно. Исправлю.
Frans S (2022-08-27 12:28:19+00:00): See my remarks on other changesets. The issues are the same
Best regards
trigpoint (2022-08-20 15:55:33+00:00): Hi, I am baffled as to why you have added use_sidepath here? On mapillary I cannot see any signs prohibiting pedestrians or cyclists on this road so wondering what your sources are?

Cheers Phil
ntzm (2023-01-03 15:48:13+00:00): This should probably be reverted
trigpoint (2023-01-03 16:39:31+00:00): Mapper has not replied and there is no mapillary evidence of such restrictions.

Tags removed.
wkdgs (2022-07-27 08:19:51+00:00): In solchen Fällen kann man auch gut einen Lebenszyklus-Präfix verwenden (z.B. disused):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124040803
occasion (2022-07-27 08:55:40+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, das war mir nicht klar.

Es ist jedoch fraglich, ob dieser Präfix wirklich hilfreich ist. Wenn ich Trinkstellen mit "overpass turbo" mit Wizard suche, wird mir diese Stelle mit angegeben. Exportiere ich alle Objekte in eine GPX-Datei (um sie weiter zu verabeiten), dann geht diese Info sehr leicht "unter" und man steht im Zweifelsfall dann vor einer trockenen Quelle.
wkdgs (2022-07-27 10:15:01+00:00): Eigentlich sollten die Objekte mit Präfix nicht angezeigt werden. Z.B. zeigt 'way["highway"]({{bbox}});' nicht die Straßen an, die den Präfix "abandoned" haben. Die Abfrage 'way["abandoned:highway"]({{bbox}});' zeigt dagegen alle an, die den Präfix haben.
angys (2022-08-22 17:08:05+00:00): Lrg Rain Tree Brg, seriously the road name after this?
PT-53 (2022-09-06 11:42:44+00:00): Hallo Vermesser10,
Du hast dieses Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081111435/history
neu eingezeichnet, direkt über dieses Gebäude:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256818908/history

War das ein Versehen?
Und was sollen die Merkmale
- public_transport=station
- railway=halt
?
Die Federseebahn gibt es doch schon jahrzehnte nicht mehr!

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Vermesser10 (2022-09-06 12:05:20+00:00): Hallo,

natürlich gibt tes die Federseebahn nicht mehr. Aber das Gebäude -ehemalige Bahnstation- existiert noch . Siehe hierzu auf Mapy.cz "Wanderkarte" das Foto dazu.
Leider habe ich keine Signatur für ehemalige Bahnhofsgebäude gefunden.
Vielleicht gibts eine Hilfestellung??!!
Fischkopp0815 (2022-09-06 13:09:07+00:00): Mein Vorschlag: Lifecycle-Prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Ich habe das überlagernde Gebäude gelöscht und das alte mit Tags mit disused:* ergänzt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256818908/
PT-53 (2022-09-06 13:27:15+00:00): Disused >  Wiederinbetriebnahme/ -Nutzung leicht möglich. Das dürfte wohl nicht wirklich zutreffend sein. "was:..." wäre wohl passender.
Vermesser10 (2022-09-06 16:17:19+00:00): in der Karte ist die ehemalige Bahnstrecke als Federseebahn (müsste dann ehem. Federseebahn heißen) gekennzeichnet. Heute oft Radweg, teilweise verschwunden und kann nicht reaktiviert werden. Die letzten erkennbaren Bahnhöfe z.B. in Dürmentingen, Bad Buchau oder Seelenwald gehören dazu. Sie sind kulturelles Erbe einer vergangenen Epoche. Leider gibt es die Signatur "ehemaliges Bahnhofsgebäude" nicht in den Legenden. Als Alternative "historische Gebäude"
Vermesser10 (2022-09-08 09:49:00+00:00): Tolle Diskussion. "Ich lösch das weg......." hab aber keinen Verbesserungsvorschlag. Typisch.
Fischkopp0815 (2022-09-08 10:09:43+00:00): Hallo Vermesser10,
Du hattest ein weiteres Gebäude über das alte gelegt. Diese Doppelung habe ich beseitigt. Deine Infos sind jetzt in etwas anderer Form am alten Bahnhofgebäude. Das ist mein Vorschlag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256818908/