piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2021-08-27 10:47:29+00:00): OK so 2 iD Editor tabs were open, the first reused without first switching to history whilst having completed/saved an CS in a second browser tab. Speculation, continuing where i was before editing/expanding the same long line will have copied it into the session. Note to self. Make sure all tabs are in history view before resuming edit.
spiregrain (2021-08-27 13:02:53+00:00): Is it open then?  Brilliant!
CjMalone (2021-08-27 22:21:31+00:00): It's listed in FHRS, it shouldn't be listed there (significantly) before opening.

https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/1389153

I did have bit of an ulterior motive, being that it was contradicting itself as being tagged as an disused amenity as well as an amenity.
CjMalone (2021-08-27 22:23:34+00:00): (local?) news has it as opening today, so perfectly timed. :)

https://www.timeout.com/london/news/a-first-look-inside-londons-first-wendys-082721
spiregrain (2021-08-28 07:02:26+00:00): Thanks!  On my way out last night, I noticed that the banners on Great Eastern Road have changed from "coming soon" to "now open", so it's all lined up!
user_21736114 (2025-07-23 04:24:35+00:00): Revert 110333608 Restoration of the official name

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169321975
skyper (2021-10-01 16:37:43+00:00): Hallo karowj
Willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe mal das `noexit=yes` am Verbindungsknoten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1603420943) entfernt.
Ist das eventuell eine Tiefgarageneinfahrt?

Grüße skyper
karowj (2021-10-04 18:37:24+00:00): Jep, du hast recht. 
Hatte den Chat hier "verlegt" und dir ne PN geschrieben.
Hrüße
karowj
user_5359 (2021-08-27 19:32:55+00:00): Hello! Please use the key highway instead of Road!
kapazao (2021-08-27 13:54:49+00:00): Hola, ¿por qué eliminas el etiquetado de las plazas, cuál es el problema?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110334057
fabiotofy (2021-08-31 14:59:39+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto. Come mai hai eliminato il tag name della Ciclopedonale Versa-Judrio B ? E' li dal 2019. Hanno cambiato percorso ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110334742
eggie (2021-08-27 11:25:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-27 11:10:55+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 66432349, 66432499, 66445367, 66445535, 66445607, 66446764, 66446785, 66446831, 66447206, 66455341, 66455498, 66455511, 66455535, 66455550, 66455687, 66455721, 66455921, 66455947, 66456203, 66456258, 66456329, 66456574, 66456614, 66456723, 66456820, 66456885, 66456912, 66456954, 66457028, 66457081, 66457134, 66457240, 66457328, 66457388, 66457508, 66457586, 66457664, 66457684, 66457795, 66458006, 66458098, 66458153, 66458183, 66466844, 66466869, 66466892, 66467556, 66467636, 66467706, 66467854, 66468075, 66468876, 66491765, 66492768, 66492980, 66493350, 66493952, 66494061, 66494093, 66494916, 66494966, 66848163, 66848188, 66848214, 66848256, 66848271, 66848912, 66848993, 66849031, 66849257, 66849329.
RicoElectrico (2021-08-27 11:34:16+00:00): Hi, I think it should be tagged  fee="2,50 zł" in that case.
5R-MFT (2021-08-27 12:35:17+00:00): After Updated in OsmAnd live I adjust it to night.
RicoElectrico (2021-08-27 12:40:33+00:00): OK :) Thank you for other changes as well, many of the POIs in Gdynia are outdated after I mapped them a few years ago, and any help will be appreciated.

I wish you a pleasant stay, however the weather is not the prettiest right now, let's hope it improves a bit (:
5R-MFT (2021-08-27 13:02:59+00:00): Mapping with umbrella is not so easy, but a little bit always is possible. Already updated a Restaurant with pictures for OpenPlacesReview.

The gondola in Gdynia near Port up to the hill is out of order. Do you know something?
RicoElectrico (2021-08-27 13:46:07+00:00): I have no idea, but in 2020 it was closed due to the pandemic. After all, it's a confined space, and there's a guard sitting whenever it runs.

It is certainly not meant to be closed forever :)
NKA (2021-08-27 17:14:00+00:00): Har Leif Larsens vei fått fysisk midtskille der? Hvis nei, skal den ikke mappes med separate kjørebaner.
aceman444 (2021-09-09 22:46:46+00:00): Zdravim, podla coho zmena nazvu mosta? Uvadzate iba survey. Je to tam na nejakej tabuli? Lebo vo vsetkych sucasnych clankoch je zauzivany nazov Lafranconi aj ked je chybny. To, ze sa pri nom premenovala zastavka MHD nic neznamena.
Valec (2021-09-10 17:47:31+00:00): Tabule na moste s názvom boli k 25.8.2021 zmenené, viď:
https://imhd.sk/ba/galeria-media/f/901697/266680/i?ref=ba%2Fdiskusna-tema%2F1%2FV%25C5%25A1eobecn%25C3%25A1-diskusia%3Fdfpi%3D240680
archie (2021-08-27 12:16:42+00:00): Hi, what is the source of this restriction?
locke (2021-08-27 12:27:43+00:00): Hi, the source is my personal visit last week. There is a sign "no motorcars and motorbikes" plus "gäller ej behörig traffic" and "privat väg".
archie (2021-08-27 12:48:41+00:00): Ok, thanks!
yrtimiD (2025-04-28 23:19:04+00:00): "פינוי מתקרב"
אבל אתה בטוח שיש באמת שכונה בשם כזה?
Flayer (2025-04-29 05:31:59+00:00): היי, יכול להיות שערכתי משהו באזור הזה, אבל בחיי שלא יצרתי שם שכונה בשם כזה או בשם כלשהו.
Rom1 (2021-08-28 07:25:54+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai supprimé ce toilette qui a été créé en doublon de celui-ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623572553 Merci.
literan (2021-08-27 16:00:20+00:00): обычно вроде через точку пишут: "name=Школа №1286. Дошкольное отделение Семицветик".

я поправлю. Прошу для унификации в Москве так же писать
Grass-snake (2021-08-27 18:56:29+00:00): Я перенёс теги с полигона здания https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28909267/history

Заодно задам вопрос:
Нужен-ли адрес на территории школы? Кто-то использует эту информацию? Часто вижу такую особенность.
literan (2021-08-28 09:45:20+00:00): кто-то ставит, кто-то нет. Помню, была дискуссия, так к однозначному выводу и не пришли. Я не ставлю
Roko334 (2022-05-28 18:22:46+00:00): А что это за крепость в сосновом бору в лесу мне не найти ее
nsgb (2021-09-03 09:22:19+00:00): Why did you delete way 974996460? That road exists, I edited it two weeks ago. It's the road north of Ulfvsunda Slott.
Snusmumriken (2021-09-03 11:58:41+00:00): when I drove past it, it was quite obvious that it was at least no longer meant for cars. what kind of road do you consider it to be?
nsgb (2021-09-07 13:54:46+00:00): Good question! It's still possible to use this small section of road to turn around, drop people off and so on... at least last time I checked it. Was it blocked when you passed it?

Because it looks like a road for passing cars, I think it's useful for it to be part of the map, otherwise descriptions like "take the 2nd road to the left after the castle" could confuse people.
Snusmumriken (2021-09-08 04:13:54+00:00): What I noticed when driving along Ulvsundavägen was that at that point the curb was high and sharp. You wouldn't want to traverse it with a car. Also the would be intersection with the foot and bicycle track had no indication that a car might cross it. Also the instructions on their webpage says that when coming by car one should use Margaretalundsvägen that is to the south of the castle
nsgb (2021-09-15 12:45:36+00:00): I did a closer inspection and I agree with you. The curb was a new addition that I had missed. They have also removed signs and the road is blocked off from normal traffic.

All good then! Thank you for a good discussion.
Nordøk (2021-08-28 21:49:07+00:00): jamesks has created those gaps with painstaking work https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99210101 – ain't it a loss of information to delete them?
Russ (2021-08-29 11:17:42+00:00): I have posted about this on the talk-gb mailing list with some more detail, and I'm pausing mapping for the moment:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2021-August/027595.html
Russ (2021-09-02 13:29:27+00:00): Reverted by changeset #110620381
zluuzki (2021-08-27 16:24:09+00:00): Hello, why are you adding addr:city to every street? This is not mentioned at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr#Where_to_add_the_address and i see no purpose in doing so. The adress of a street can simply be generated using city's boundary. 
And why tagged you https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9384441 as highway=tertiary? This is obivously an normal residential road, not an road that links settlements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=tertiary) or a "Minor Collector" road. You should also read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=secondary because you misused that too, for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9105577 and in surrounding areas. This is neither an secondary road "that links large town", as it links the small hamlet "Bluffton" with the small town Arlington, not is it an "Major collector": It collects maybe a few people from the 5 farms along it - thats certainly not enough to be a "Major Collector".
Long story short: You sometimes tag roads with highter classifications than they're actually are - you should read the wikipages about the Tags you're using. No offence :)
txemt (2021-08-27 23:07:40+00:00): I've answered this question before. According to https://itos.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=962a2591f91a4303aeafe016ba8db96b and to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Georgia_(U.S._state) those are mapped correctly. 

I'm merely mapping out how the Georgia Department of Transportation has defined roads and highways within the state as well as the Georgia wiki for FC. If you have any issues with how they classify roads, please take it up with them, not I. I have no control over that.

All of your arguments about what a road should be or shouldn't be are your opinions based on the wiki links you provided. According to the wiki links and the Georgia link I have provided, those roads should be tertiary or secondary roads with an HFCS classification respectively.
zluuzki (2021-08-28 08:35:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Georgia_(U.S._state) - this is where it conflicts. 
For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9053572 The "Major collector road" classification of the road does not match with the description at the Georgia-Wiki page. (not just the linked segment, it applies to the entire road from Bluffton to Arlington) This cannot be considered an secondary road, because it is not an State Route, it does not provide access to larger towns, there are no generators of highter traffic volume - there are a few houses along it, and the possibility that people use it as a through route is very small too, there are enough state routes that people would use instead. The Georgia-Wikipage definition of highway=tertiary fits mutch better "County Routes .... These collect traffic from local streets in residential neighborhoods and channels it into the arterial system.  Provide service to remaining smaller rural communities." And the normal highway=tertiary wiki definition fits even more. "Outside urban areas, tertiary roads are those with low to moderate traffic which link smaller settlements such as villages or hamlets." This is exactly what the mentioned road is. I don't think we should blindly use these HFCS classifications for everything, as they does not always make sense.
txemt (2021-08-28 11:07:10+00:00): I used to have the same way of thinking, a long time ago. Just because it's a state route makes it must be a certain type of road. The Georgia wiki (that we've all come to "love" now) is slightly outdated, but the FHWA gives a clear definition of what rural minor and major collectors are here https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/statewide/related/highway_functional_classifications/section03.cfm#Toc336872985

The road between Bluffton and Arlington fits the major collector definition of "Link these places with nearby larger towns and cities or with Arterial routes." The series of county roads between these two towns actually connects to the larger picture of connecting a US highway to a Georgia state highway. They may be county roads but GDot determines that they serve a higher purpose. 

If you want to go along with all county roads need to be tertiary, then there are a lot of unpaved roads which would get the upgrade, as there are many unpaved roads which are county roads, throughout the state.

If you want to look at something interesting, US 377 between where it connects with US 277 (SW of Rock Springs) and Junction, in Texas is classified as a Major Collector. Yes, a US Highway is classified as a collector, not an arterial road. TxDot has deemed it as such. There are always anomalies within the system of functional classification.

It's not just blindly using the HFCS for everything, Georgia is doing that. There are a lot of things that we as editors can do to help the HFCS along within the map system. The incident that helped start this debate is a good example. Georgia may classify some dirt roads as Major or Minor collectors, but as an editor, we can click that it's unpaved to give the end user a lesser chance of being routed down the road.

I'm willing to update the Georgia wiki to make it a clearer picture for anyone else. The last edit I saw on that page was from you a couple of days ago where you changed the word "recommended" to "proposed." No real major changes have been done to that page in almost a decade, so I am in belief the weeds need to be pulled and it be given some fresh air.
zluuzki (2021-08-28 18:55:58+00:00): So then there has to be a proper consensus. It cannot be that this HFCS system is taken here as source of all classifications, but not even the "HFCS=*" tag is documented somewhere. There must be a decision: should we use the HFCS system as the source of our road types, or should we determine the road type ourselves using the definitions already available on the wiki? Don't get me wrong: I have no problem with using this system, and certainly not with HFCS tags. It's definitely useful for cases like the one in Texas and as a general orientation. But I also don't want e.g. highway=secondary in Europe to mean something different than highway=secondary in Utah, and something different again in Georgia, because states have their own definitions of importance. But that's exactly how it is when you apply https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Georgia_(U.S._state)#Highway_Classification . The standard definition for hw=secondary is "A road linking large towns." This certainly does not apply to the road I mentioned earlier, however it is classified as such by HFCS. This road is never in my mind a "major collector" because I see the road as pretty unimportant, it doesn't link any larger towns to the "arterial network" after all, and it doesn't collect much traffic either. I don't want all County Routes to be tertiary either, we have to consider the importance and the stage of development. Not all US Routes are trunk, not all State Routes are primary and not all Country Roads are tertiary. I have already tagged a country road as highway=track, because it was only a dead end grass road into a forest and not a single house stood at it.
txemt (2021-08-28 23:36:27+00:00): Have you looked at the ArcGIS for Georgia?
zluuzki (2021-08-29 05:09:42+00:00): Yes.
txemt (2021-09-01 14:49:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Txemt#State_of_Georgia
gscholz (2021-09-04 06:21:40+00:00): Hi Gabriel,
your recent changeset have added several errors to the OSM database regarding oberlapping ways and not connected ways:



http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-53.32576&lat=-23.50070&zoom=13&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Guido
frasty (2021-08-27 19:27:18+00:00): Ciao, cercavo anch'io coordinate delle vasche di acquacultura nel golfo di Follonica. Posso chiederti che sorgente hai usato?
MarcoR (2021-08-27 20:39:07+00:00): Ciao! Come fonte diretta ho usato le immagini "Maxar Standard Imagery" tracciando le aree con il plugin mapathoner di JOSM. In passato le avevo cercate senza successo lungo costa (avevo visto in vendita dei mitili provenienti dal Golfo di Follonica). Stamani, su un giornale locale, ho letto che si trovavano a 2 miglia dalla costa così ho provato a setacciare l'area del golfo su JOSM  con tutte le immagini aeree utilizzabili da OpenStreetMap e le ho trovate. Non sono un esperto ma la forma circolare mi sembra compatibile con quella di una gabbia di itticoltura. Spero di aver risposto alla tua domanda, fammi sapere se ci sono problemi. Se vuoi/puoi migliorare la mappatura, considerando che io non ho conoscenza locale, sei libero di farlo :)
A presto, Marco
felipeeugenio (2021-08-27 13:26:18+00:00): Hola
Eliminaron esta entrada? está cerrada?
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110340450
Gadiel Sepúlveda (2021-08-27 20:51:08+00:00): Tengo entendido que sí, al menos observando las imágenes satelitales más recientes.

Saludos.
felipeeugenio (2021-08-29 12:06:26+00:00): ok, voy a revisar también.
No estoy seguro de que "sevirce sea o más adecuando, pero gracias
ivanbranco (2021-08-30 16:16:29+00:00): Hi pika_sky,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375636944/history
note: the right tag is alt_name:en=*

can you fix it?
pika_sky (2021-08-31 07:28:26+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,

Thank you for letting me know the wrong tag. I've fixed it. 

The mistake you mentioned was made by someone, but I'll correct such a mistake if I notice it from now on.

Thank you.
gscholz (2021-09-04 06:43:19+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.88929&lat=-5.29881&zoom=8&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you may know these ways cannot be used by routing software.

Can you please fix this and may be think about how to avoid this error as this seems to be a typical part of your workflow?
Kind Regards
Guido
hauke-stieler (2021-10-07 18:31:33+00:00): Hi,

ein paar Kommentare zum Parkscheinautomaten [0]: Zum einen war die Position nicht richtig (ca. 15m von der tatsächlichen Position entfernt), zum anderen habe ich die tags mal aufgeräumt. Sowas wie name oder wikipedia/wikidata wird an Parkscheinautomaten nicht gesetzt.

Viele Grüße
Hauke

[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9036303861
Warin61 (2021-08-28 07:21:25+00:00): HI,
I have removed the relation for Halley Park and made it into a simple closed way. The relation was not closed and used the nodes for a residential landuse relation. The new way is independent of the past data.
Nordøk (2021-08-27 17:30:23+00:00): What exactly have you changed here?
HaPe-CZ (2021-08-30 06:57:17+00:00): No major changes. Leveling the tracks according to the new (last) swisstopo. Minor adjustments to the position even on the roads. Alternatively, write a specific item.
bergaufsee (2021-08-29 15:32:12+00:00): Hallo,
gut gemeint, aber so passt das leider nicht ;)
Wenn der Laden nicht mehr in Falkensee existiert, sollte ein neuer node an der richtigen Position erstellt werden und der node hier gelöscht oder alternativ an die neue Stelle verschoben werden. Wenn du dabei Hilfe benötigst, kannst du dich gern bei mir melden. Ich wüsste aktuell auch gar nicht wo der neue Standort genau ist, die Adresse gibt es zwei mal, einmal direkt Herrnhut und dann auch noch im Ortsteil Strahwalde.
schöne Grüße
gileri (2021-08-28 07:06:18+00:00): Ah mince j'aurais dû être explicite...

Le tag source est le plus adapté sur l'ensemble de changement plutôt que sur le nœud.

À la prochaine modification, il faudra sinon que le contributeur modifie ce champ sur l'objet. Et c'est très souvent oublié, rendant la compréhension complexe.

Pour le mettre sur l'ensemble de changement, c'est dans la page "d'envoi" de l'éditeur iD qu'il faut le faire (attribut Source) juste avant d'envoyer les données.
Gonéo (2021-08-30 07:44:04+00:00): OK je suis allé faire un tour sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:source?uselang=fr.
Krteček (2024-01-02 17:13:28+00:00): Ist das Merkmal "Furt (ford=yes)" am 27.08.2021 beabsichtigt hinzugefügt worden?
Verläuft der Pfad tatsächlich auf seiner gesamten Länge im Wasser?
samuel_geovelo (2026-02-02 08:53:42+00:00): Bonjour, 
La description de vos parkings à trotinettes électriques ne semble plus correspondre au wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkick-scooter_parking
Cela vous convient-il si nous les modifions tous ? Un utilisateur nous a prévenu et nous a lister les nodes avec cette requête overpass : https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2jOV
Merci et cordialement,
nihombashi19 (2026-02-03 08:38:59+00:00): bien sûr !
je crois que le tag kick-scooter_parking n'existait pas à ce moment (et j'en prends note pour l'avenir)
merci
DaveF (2021-09-01 23:10:21+00:00): Hi
To check, are all 4 platforms in use by the public?
WalthamCity (2021-09-02 05:53:58+00:00): There are 6 platforms at the station now. Two for the subsurface lines (Circle, H&C), two for London Overground and two for the Elizabeth Line. The former 4 are open to the public and mapped. The latter aren’t  open yet and aren’t mapped. 

In its previous configuration, the station had two additional subsurface platforms, but these lines have been removed and the former 4 platforms have been merged together to a single pair of platforms. There’s a very detailed description of the changes on the Wikipedia page for Whitechapel station.
mangerlahn (2021-10-12 22:23:43+00:00): Hi, 

du hattest den Fußweg neben dem bereits geplanten Pfad eingezogen. Ich bin dort neulich wieder lang, die Bauarbeiten scheinen nun zu beginnen. Daher habe ich den proposed Pfad auf construction gesetzt. Ein zweiter Pfad scheint mir etwas redundant?

Viele Grüße,
Max
ich-ich-ich-ich-ich-ich (2021-10-13 13:39:15+00:00): Hi!

Ich finde es schwierig, eine definitive Antwort darauf zu geben.

Als ich den Pfad gemapped habe, war er noch benutzbar.

Falls du sicher bist, dass der Fußweg vor Abschluss der Bauarbeiten nie wieder benutzbar wird, ist es wahrscheinlich sinnvoll, ihn zu entfernen.

Wenn du nicht ausschließen kannst, dass es längere Paupausen geben wird, in denen der Fußweg benutzbar sein wird (und der neue Radweg aber noch nicht fertig ist), ist es vielleicht sinnvoller, den Weg noch drin zu lassen.

Ich weiß leider nicht, was hier die beste Variante ist. Deswegen mach gerne, wie du denkst :-)
djsa (2025-10-23 09:35:03+00:00): De schrijfwijze is cobblestone, heb de wegen aangepast.
cimm (2025-10-23 09:39:15+00:00): Ah, goed gezien. Bedankt voor de fix!
Badojo (2021-08-27 16:12:20+00:00): Reverted, this relation represents the region, the country is represented by (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2088990)
Coirib (2022-04-10 19:32:17+00:00): As per your fixme, the Galway - Dalton line (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342835295) appears to be gone in the new Bing imagery. Should it be deleted? or is disused:power a thing?
VictorIE (2022-04-10 20:58:01+00:00): I think demolished:power would be suited in this case, given that it appears to be gone completely. I think it's good to keep things, so that they don't get remapped.
Coirib (2022-04-10 22:55:43+00:00): Good point thanks, ill change it to demolished:power
highflyer74 (2021-08-28 07:28:14+00:00): Moin willmu!

Danke für die Öffnungszeiten hier! Die Website und Telefonnummer war bereits getaggt. Denke daran, dass es in OSM auch das contact:*=* Schema gibt, welches gleichwertig mit dem älteren phone=* etc. ist. Am besten schau Dir immer alle Tags an, die an einem Objekt hängen, um doppelte Datenerfassung zu vermeiden. Danke!