piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2024-02-18 09:14:15+00:00): Too bad you never replied…
I surveyed this and fixed the name.
https://i.imgur.com/2nFRb2G.jpeg
Frans S (2022-04-24 08:04:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
You requested a review.
See my comments on changeset 119716751.
These are valid here as well.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119716001
V-Li (2022-04-16 22:26:37+00:00): Die Eigenschaft Fahrradstraße musst du auf die bereits existierende Straße legen, sonst liegen zwei Wege übereinander. Die QA-Werkzeuge wie Osmose und Keepright schreien schon: https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=107&error=134625546
MxxCon (2022-04-15 04:39:07+00:00): this is a private driveway :) https://roadview.planninglabs.nyc/view/-73.91766440560569/40.618621776395244
I fixed the tags. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119716511
Frans S (2022-04-23 14:59:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119716751
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 09:59:34+00:00): There are actually 2 summits here.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 10:40:44+00:00): Have you checked the `ele=`?
bxl-forever (2022-04-15 10:02:07+00:00): Hello,
When you add a name, do not forget to remove "noname=yes" if it was set, because that creates an obvious contradiction.
Good to know this area has a name now.
seii1666 (2022-05-14 01:02:41+00:00): geo:26.38730,43.97359?z=18
Jordi MF (2023-03-15 00:09:22+00:00): Hola Joaquín,
Gracias por mejorar los datos de OpenStreetMap. He visto que, en esta edición, añadiste un camino con el nombre "Suunto". ¿Este nombre es oficial, lo usan los habitantes de Castellnovo o proviene de algún uso histórico?

Por cierto, ya que parece que conoces Castellnovo, podrías revisar si las calles están bien etiquetadas como residenciales (highway=living_street). Sé que en la entradas al pueblo desde Almedíjar y en la calle Portalhay una señal que así lo indica (señal de calle residencial). Entendí que todo el centro histórico se comporta como calles residenciales,  por eso lo mapeé así, pero tú lo sabrás mejor.

Saludos,
Jordi
Joaquinpegil (2023-03-15 19:14:47+00:00): Hola Jordi 
Efectivamente soy de Castellnovo y conozco a la perfección todas las sendas, calles etc

La senda Suunto es un camino sin monte desde hace muchos años, le puse este nombre a la espera de encontrar alguno usado por algún vecino pero nadie ponía nombre a este camino/senda, ahora después de un año pues ya todos conocen este camino como Suunto y es el nombre que utilizamos habitualmente así que lo dejaremos como está.

En cuanto a las calles peatonales no hay calles peatonales en Castellnovo, solo el paseo a la mina que cree como peatonal el resto es zona donde los coches transitan sin problemas.

Cualquier cosa me dices.

Saludos
Jordi MF (2023-03-16 13:07:44+00:00): Hola Joaquín,
Revisando el nombre de dicho camino, he encontrado que, oficialmente, se llama "Camino de Traselsanto", según el Nomenclàtor Geogràfic Valencià de l'Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua (tenemos permiso para su uso) y disponible en el visor del Institut Geogràfic Valencià (https://visor.gva.es/visor/). En caso de que no haya ninguna señal que así lo indique, ese debería ser el nombre.

Si, como afirmas, el nombre se ha extendido entre la población local, podrías usar la etiqueta "loc_name=Suunto". En caso de que el nombre sea usado por los usuarios de BTT, "mtb:name=Suunto". Pero si se trata de publicidad encubierta para promocionar en OpenStreetMap la marca de una empresa privada que fabrica relojes inteligentes, este no debería ser el lugar.
Saludos,
Jordi
Joaquinpegil (2023-03-16 14:19:29+00:00): Buenas Jordi
Publicidad de relojes inteligentes en una senda/camino de pueblo de 500 habitantes??? Este camino no es tras del Santo pero si quieres cambiar el nombre sin problemas no es algo que esté hecho con ánimo de ningún tipo.
Saludos
ParkingAMS (2022-04-14 15:26:37+00:00): Eggie, als jij hiernaar kijkt... Gaat dat wel goed met die brug voor de metro die er boven loopt?
eggie (2022-04-14 15:41:29+00:00): Zal zo even kijken
eggie (2022-04-14 15:44:57+00:00): Editor iD heeft een soort ingebouwde lijm lijkt het wel.
Je kunt dat aan elkaar plakken voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
Bij editor JOSM is dat de linker CTRL toets. Zal even kijken wat weer los kan. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119718103

Gr eggie
eggie (2022-04-14 15:54:41+00:00): De amenity=parking op de node heb ik verwijderd. De parkeerplaats losgemaakt van een node op de rails. De rails weer teruggelegd.
area=yes verwijderd. Dat hoeft niet.
Viaduct en gras losgemaakt.
Best lastig hier als je net begint. Onthoud in ieder geval die linker alttoets. ;k Zie ook nog een vreemde rendering bij het oostelijke viaduct. .. even verder kijken.
eggie (2022-04-14 15:56:47+00:00): Daar is net deze mapper mee bezig geweest.. Dus dat klopt nu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119672501#map=15/52.3880/4.8209

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119672501

Het is nu oke.. 

Groet,
eggie
ParkingAMS (2022-04-14 16:02:18+00:00): Thanks, eggie!
eggie (2022-04-14 16:11:15+00:00): Hoi.. 'k Denk nog even oneway=yes toevoegen.
Gr eggie
Mavasnl (2022-04-14 16:22:12+00:00): Onder "tags" zie ik al oneway = yes  staan. Bedoel je dan ergens anders?
eggie (2022-04-14 16:30:24+00:00): Ik bedoel op die parkeerplaats. Daar zie ik richtingpijlen staan.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119718257

MVG
eggie
Mavasnl (2022-04-14 16:54:54+00:00): Je hebt gelijk. Er staan zelfs verkeersborden die dat aangeven. Dus ik zal dat aanpassen.
eggie (2022-04-14 16:58:51+00:00): Top!
Glassman (2022-04-16 22:30:08+00:00): #TIP: Square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119718273
EV97 (2022-04-14 15:33:20+00:00): Forgot source, Helsinki region orthophoto and survey
Larryjrtoco (2025-02-13 19:16:29+00:00): Apartment mobility improvements
mike140 (2022-04-30 20:42:44+00:00): Не стоило ровно нарисованное здание делать кривым. Отрисовывать здания следует по его фундаменту, а не по крыше
limes11 (2023-11-25 15:52:42+00:00): Hi, 

was zeichnet diesen Friedhof als Schutzgebiet des Natur- und Landschaftsschutz aus? Es ist sicher kein Naturschutzgebiet, also leisure=nature_reserve, ich würde aber auch die übrigen protect-Tags entfernen. (Tatsächlich gibt es kein anderes Objekt mit protect_class=6 in Deutschland.) Oder gibt es dazu eine Dokumentation?

Viele Grüße

Limes
czubi (2023-11-25 17:51:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893944919
Naturschutz, geschützte Gehölze. 

Nach dem wiki wohl eher nicht 6 sondern vermutlich eher 7
czubi (2023-11-25 18:03:52+00:00): leisure=nature_reserve muss wohl weg ...
limes11 (2023-11-25 18:19:50+00:00): Hm. Gibt es dazu Dokumentation? Eine Satzung, eine Verordnung, einen Betreiber? Besondere Regeln, Verbote?
czubi (2023-11-25 18:22:15+00:00): Für was meinst du? OTG gibts ne gelb/schwarze Eule und Zusatzschild "geschützte Gehölze". Was brauchts noch?
limes11 (2023-11-25 20:05:12+00:00): Ach mit Eulenschild, ja dann passt das. Ist ein Unikat mit der Bezeichnung. Habe es angepasst. Danke!
ivanbranco (2022-06-23 18:37:45+00:00): Hi BREYSSE,

maybe depth=* would fit better than height=* for canals?
ivanbranco (2022-07-03 08:49:54+00:00): Hi, since:
1. I see you are still active but didn't reply
2. You never replied to the other 2 changeset comments other users did

I will procede myself with this edit, good mapping :)
user_5359 (2022-04-16 15:15:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/1681245177/history. Which language did you mean with name:bosanski?
user_5359 (2022-04-15 06:47:11+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key "phone pizza"? (please don't forget the plus sign for the country code)
ZeroJeden (2022-07-17 16:12:09+00:00): Proszę nie wprowadzać do mapy danych niezgodnych z prawdą
RicoElectrico (2022-07-17 21:30:20+00:00): @ZeroJeden: A co według Ciebie nie zgadza się? Mało konstruktywny komentarz.
ZeroJeden (2022-07-17 22:13:38+00:00): @RicoElectrico: Mało konstruktywna była zmiana, przywracająca znienacka drogę rowerową, która została zlikwidowana wiele lat temu i zostało to dokładnie opisane w tagach. Poprawiłem, więc obecnie jest zgodnie ze stanem faktycznym. A do braku minimum odpowiedzialności za wprowadzane dane to szkoda czasu, żeby się w ogóle szerzej odnosić. Nie pojmuję po co ktoś wprowadza takie śmieci psując publiczny zbiór danych, który wiele osób z mozołem tworzy.
RicoElectrico (2022-07-17 22:26:33+00:00): @ZeroJeden: Uważam, że mało widziałeś, jeśli chodzi o śmieci ;)

W każdym razie, bo tak się naprodukowałeś, a nie dałeś linku do obiektu, który powinien być w pierwszym komentarzu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830065430/history
ovruni (2022-04-14 19:35:08+00:00): Hola danielaamunoz, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en varios de tus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados, solamente se indica "#osmpe-unmsm-comaru". Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
martien-176 (2022-04-15 16:22:36+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of your mappings here. Most of the 12 buildings you did here are well mapped. However, 2 of them have odd shapes. It is hard to see (depends also on the quality of your monitor), but if you zoom in enough you can see these are just as rectangular as the others, the one imo being 2 buildings located close to another. So please keep mapping (and with more experience the quality will increase automatically). Regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119721268
Frans S (2022-04-16 10:05:06+00:00): Hi. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. Please use the tag path for small paths rather than footway. Paths can be used for cattle, motorbikes and by foot.  Footway is specific for foot.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119721342
R Hariram Aatreya (2022-04-17 01:49:51+00:00): This is in the middle of the river. Not sure if locality is the right tag for this.
ivanbranco (2022-04-17 06:17:22+00:00): From the Wiki: "The place=locality tag is used to name an unpopulated location", this is a named location and is unpopulated, seems okay to me

You can proceed in different ways:
1. If you know what type of place is, fix it with the correct value
2. If this place doesn't exist in reality, just delete it. If it exist in another position, move it

But changing it from "locality" to "yes" is just a loss of information. Also you could have asked more infos to the user that added this node before you (Planemad) before editing.
Frans S (2022-04-19 13:04:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please do not use the tag highway= footway.
Here Path or residential is recommended.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119721455
eerib (2022-04-14 18:31:14+00:00): Hello,
The features you deleted were previously discussed in a recent changeset. I've linked that changeset below so you can read through the discussion.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118919846#map=16/49.3794/-123.2515

I've reverted your changeset as a result. If you disagree with this action, I encourage you to contact the Data Working Group to resolve the dispute.

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
eerib (2022-04-19 06:17:11+00:00): Hello John,

I noticed you deleted the features in the area again over a few different changesets. Perhaps you may not have seen my previous comment so I'm going to leave another here and send you a message.

I'm going to go into detail on why the trail should stay in case you're unfamiliar with OpenStreetMap. OpenStreetMap has a "Ground truth" policy, which means features are mapped as they are on the ground, even if an outside group does not want them mapped. There are a few noted exceptions to this policy, including indigenous sacred sites, specific endangered species locations, and specific areas of safety concern. This trail is heavily used by multiple groups, including mountain bikers, hikers, trail runners, Geocachers, and peak baggers to name a few. In addition, none of the exceptions apply. That is why the trail should stay on the map.

Further, the OSM US Trails Working Group recommends that "Unofficial, unmaintained trails, renegade trails, and social trails" should be kept on the map for emergency service groups, junction navigation, and because the trail will just be added later by someone else but possibly with less information.

The relevant links for the information I've talked about is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information#Other_Reasons_not_to_Map
https://www.openstreetmap.us/2021/12/osmus-trails-working-group
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Trails_Working_Group
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project

Let me know if you agree with my interpretation of the OSM policies and what steps you would like to take going forward.

Cheers, eerib
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-04-20 17:52:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119965285 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for previously discussed private trails
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
4004 (2022-04-18 02:09:52+00:00): 8 лет не тот адрес...
yorados (2022-05-03 20:55:13+00:00): Hi Til,
- i recommend 
contact:website instead of operator:..
- I suggest tagging 
leisure=hackerspace
- building=house seems not appropriate, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dhouse
seems more like
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dindustrial
tag building=yes if you are unsure.

Viel Spaß noch beim mappen!
ovruni (2022-04-14 19:36:24+00:00): Hola GloriaAngellaRevolledoCoba, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en varios de tus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados, solamente se indica "#osmpe-unmsm-comaru". Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
ivanbranco (2022-04-14 21:55:33+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1hG4

Hi orizont_bv, you added 197 place=Alparea (place valid values are thing like village, town, hamlet ecc.), could you fix it please?
orizont_bv (2022-04-15 17:29:27+00:00): Hi ivanbranco, thank you for your message, I need clarification. I used addr:place, not place, and in wiki it is not very explicite how should be done correctly if in the village the address is only number and no street name exista for streets.
This was the combination allowed în wiki în which a search for address works, no validation error în josm, no error în OSM inspector.
Your help is very appreciated.
ivanbranco (2022-04-15 17:38:34+00:00): Hi orizont_bv,

thanks for replying. English isn't my first language so I'm not sure I got everything. But yes, addr:place could be the correct tag, the problem is you used "place=*" instead of "addr:place=*" (see the link in first comment). Also you added Alparea also as addr:city=* value, while it seems to me it is only a village of Oșorhei.

So I think the correct tagging should be:
addr:city=Oșorhei
addr:place=Alparea
addr:housenumber=*

instead of:
addr:city=Alparea
place=Alparea
addr:housenumber=*
ivanbranco (2022-04-15 17:43:50+00:00): Errata corrige: addr:city=Alparea was added by the user before you, not by you, sorry
orizont_bv (2022-04-15 17:48:44+00:00): Hi,
You got it perfectly, no worry :)
I will try out your combination, seems better.
That region is under lots of work in this period, we got the .shp file from local autority,  it has some errors, duplicate addresses, we are giving them feedback too so you will notice frequent changes.
Thank you

Thanks
orizont_bv (2022-04-15 17:49:25+00:00): owene user is still me
orizont_bv (2022-04-15 19:10:38+00:00): All addresses changed now , hoping for the best
user_5359 (2022-04-15 12:55:35+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/4136044711. What is the meaning of the tag 4423 = 4421?
overflorian (2022-04-15 13:54:56+00:00): Hi, it was obviously a mistake, thank you for spotting it. I fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119752461
Regards