piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skfd (2020-05-30 06:29:48+00:00): ой, я ошибся -- не тот чейнджсет прокоментировал. сорри (
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85929476
brianboru (2020-05-29 12:27:48+00:00): Hi FarmerT

Thanks for adding your local knowledge to OpenStreetMap. You are quite correct that neither of these ways is a Public Right of Way. However if something exists on the ground  we add it to the map. Access conditions if not indicated by signage are confirmed either by local knowledge or by reference to Definitive Maps where they have been published in an Open Data format. So I'm reinstating the farm track and tagging it as access=private(as indicated by you) because it is clearly visible on the ground, confirmed by aerial imagery.The footpath to the East does have a gpx trace so someone has walked this in the past tracking it with a GPS device but as there is no evidence either on aerial imagery or NCC definitive map I shall leave it deleted. I'll close the Notes on the track and leave them on the footpath(just in case someone wants to reinstate it).  
Could I ask you to confirm a couple of  other details - or perhaps even edit them yourself? Which service road into Lower Farm is a PROW? and what is route of the PROW around Middle Farm(where we have a FIXME node). Unfortunately NCC haven't published an Open Data version of their Definitive Map so I can't use their online version.
 Once again thankyou for your interest in OpenStreetMap which I sincerely hope you would like to continue by adding and improving  more data.

Regards

Brian Prangle
OSM UK Director
mappa-mercia community co-ordinator
FarmerT (2020-05-29 13:13:56+00:00): I am having trespass issues with both of these routes, so appreciate that in the case of the track that it is marked as private as it physcally exists.  Request that the line of the non-footpath to the East is removed from this source as it does not exist in reality.  Just because a GPX trace exists, the person who recorded it was trespassing, there is no reason for it to remain.
Lower Farm PROW ends at the Y-Junction of the two tracks.  Middle Farm PROW is as defined by by Ordnance Survey 1:25000 mapping data.
With regard to mapping changes I have only just found out about this resource so belatedly updating inaccuracies.
Many thanks.
brianboru (2020-05-29 14:06:51+00:00): Hi 
I have in fact left the footpath deleted and the notes in place to deter other mappers from re-instating it. Thanks for the info on Lower Farm - the info on Middle Farm I can't use because OS  1:25000  map data is copyrighted and as our name indicates we can only use opendata (non-copyright) or data we have surveyed or obtained from local knowledge. 

Nice solar panels on Upper Farm! It's an ongoing project in the UK to map as many soalr panels as we can

If you need any other help or info please get in touch

Regards
Brian
ma-rt-in (2020-05-30 17:57:10+00:00): Hallo,
es wäre noch ganz gut den tag office=insurance und weitere Details zu ergänzen. Zu dem ist ja der Key atm überflüssig scheinbar.
vg
ma-rt-in (2020-05-30 17:59:38+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du node 4948841123, einer Radiologie zu einem Allgemeinmediziner umgetaggt? 
vg
thetornado76 (2020-05-30 20:31:56+00:00): Da habe ich wohl offensichtlich daneben geklickt.
Danke
Hab's eben korrigiert.
VG
Bierphysik (2024-06-16 10:41:49+00:00): Moin. Wozu hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809455891 gemappt? Ein Artefakt? Ich vermute das kann weg...
Bierphysik (2024-06-16 10:42:21+00:00): mit dem Link besser erkennbar was ich meine: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809455891#map=19/50.08728/9.12284
eggie (2020-05-29 08:46:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-03 12:46:53+00:00): لطفا آموزش ببینید بعد ویرایش کنید.
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-03 12:44:51+00:00): برادر، آموزش!
Jordi MF (2020-06-10 09:44:45+00:00): Se revierte este changeset. Por favor, lee la wiki de OpenStreetMap para saber cómo se mapea una plaza. Esta plaza no es un parque, es un area peatonal.
Saludos,
Jordi
limes11 (2020-05-31 16:24:31+00:00): Dear depsm, 

What is your source for this change? I know this area and I have never seen a sign indicating an access restriction here. 

Best, Limes11
depsm (2020-06-03 05:48:45+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits.  please go through the forum  https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68933  regarding the resources we are using.We have made this edit based on the private imagery dated 1-10-2019 and added the access tag vehicle =destination as per the osm wiki   https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Ddestination.  please let me know if my edits are contradicting with the ground reality and requires any modifications. Always happy to learn from the community.
limes11 (2020-06-03 09:42:53+00:00): I understand. In this case, it is incorrect, I changed it again. I checked it personally. Could have a second look at your source? Is there really a motor_vehicle=destination sign next to the street sign? Would it be possible that you mixed it up? I doubt there was a sign last year which has since been removed. Such a restriction would not make sense for this road, as it grants access to the cemetery which is obviously visited frequently by people who would be excluded due to this restriction. 

Thanks for the quick reply and the transparency!
limes11 (2020-06-03 09:44:18+00:00): By "mixed it up" I mean: Maybe you meant one of the roads in close viccinity?
Supaplex (2020-06-18 17:20:29+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-03 12:43:35+00:00): آموزش، آموزش ،آموزش
szydzio (2020-11-19 17:51:48+00:00): Hej!Jaki jest w terenie adres tego budynku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/643112690 ? Nie jest to raczej numer 15 bo ten w/g SIP Słupsk jest on gdzie indziej. Z kolei numeru 18 dla ul. Bałtyckiej w/g ewidencji miejskiej nie ma w ogóle.
Afnui12 (2020-06-02 22:19:23+00:00): سلام dg1399 ، ممنون از علاقه شما به نقشه برداری!

در این تغییر به نظر می رسد که جاده های نامگذاری شده را حذف و چندین قسمت از هندسه شبکه راه را مختل کرده اید. این تغییرات برای تصاویر هوایی دقیق نیستند. شما همچنین نام "آیت الله مروج اردبیلی" را به چندین جاده مختلف در این منطقه اضافه نموده اید، برچسب های موجود را رونویسی کرده اید. در اینجا منابعی وجود دارد که می تواند به شما کمک و راهنمایی کنند. لطفاً اگر سؤالی دارید ، به من اطلاع دهید. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Beginners_Guide_1.1.2
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Highways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Names
Mahdi Nameghi (2020-06-08 08:39:23+00:00): سلام dg1399
متاسفانه تغییرات شما باعث ایجاد خرابی های زیادی در نقشه شده است. همینطور که گفتند لطفا ابتدا راهنمای ادیت رو مطالعه کنید تا موارد این چنینی رخ ندهد.
با تشکر از شما
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-03 12:41:20+00:00): تقاضای عاجزانه دارم که قبل از آموزش کاری نکنید.
user_11166885 (2020-05-29 09:49:34+00:00): Mi scusi, ma non pensavo che le avevano già demolite.
Afnui12 (2020-06-02 22:23:46+00:00): سلام dg1399 ، ممنون از علاقه شما به نقشه برداری!

در این تغییر به نظر می رسد چندین جاده نامگذاری شده را حذف کرده اید. این تغییرات دقیق نیستند و به داده های منحصر به فرد در اینجا آسیب می رسانند. در اینجا منابعی وجود دارد که می توانند به شما کمک کنند. لطفا اگر سوالی دارید به من اطلاع دهید. متشکرم!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Beginners_Guide_1.1.2
Rotflamingo2 (2021-11-07 10:24:23+00:00): Hallo Jochen,
mein Vorschlag zur Anpassung:
name = brand = Jysk
old_name = Dänisches Bettenlager
shop = furniture
website = https://www.jysk.de
Gruß Manfred
JochenOSM (2021-11-12 15:26:13+00:00): Hallo Manfred, das ist ja schon lange her seit ich das erfasst hatte. Wenn sich die Firma inzwischen umbenannt hat und der neue Name vor Ort auch so dran steht, dann kannst du das einfach ändern ;)
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-03 12:38:23+00:00): آموزش ببینید
Dimacn (2020-06-03 13:44:28+00:00): Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста исправьте на реальные объекты или удалите.
Majidhamidi_tehrani (2020-06-06 06:49:03+00:00): املاک مهر فراهانی
CjMalone (2020-05-29 09:36:20+00:00): I actually used "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" not Bing
Dimacn (2020-06-03 13:49:59+00:00): Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите все ваши фейковые парки отдыха.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-05-30 19:09:50+00:00): Korrektur CS-Kommentar: Rethem (nicht Ahlden)
sovereign_ch (2020-05-29 11:07:55+00:00): Hi. Der ursprüngliche tag building=* gehört trotzdem an das Gebäude, welches du zum Kindergarten umgetaggt hast. Noch eleganter wäre es, das entsprechende Areal als Kindergarten zu taggen. Gruss
mtte (2020-05-29 11:51:42+00:00): Hi, danke für das Feedback. Wenn ich das Areal als Kindergarten markiere und den building-Tag wieder zum Gebäude hinzufüge, wohin gehören dann die Tags wie preschool, amenity, etc.? Gruess
sovereign_ch (2020-05-29 12:25:14+00:00): In der Regel auf das Areal. Dürfte mit ein Grund sein, dass iD mittlerweile solchen Mist vorschlägt, wie den building-tag zu entfernen. Daher Vorsicht vor iD-Vorschlägen und bei Zweifeln im Wiki nachlesen. ;-)
 HTH
kucai (2021-08-10 13:06:23+00:00): Dari mana dapat nama Lorong Peramu Baru 3 ni? (way=750622785)
eggie (2020-05-29 10:41:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Geldt dit ook voor brom en snorfietsen. Die worden nu ook gestopt.
mofa en moped=yes wellicht?
Welk bord staat er vooraan?

MVG,
Eggie
Gert-Jan87 (2020-05-29 11:36:54+00:00): Ik kom er bijna dagelijks langs ik zal de volgende keer goed opletten. Het is in ieder geval een smaller pad (geen asfalt en gesloten met een paaltje)
Gert-Jan87 (2020-05-29 11:38:21+00:00): Verderop is ook nog een (niet ingetekende) verbinding tussen Boerenzwaluwpad en Hoevenweg. Tussen huisnr 55 en 57. Maar dit is ook niet voor auto's. De Hoevenweg is een smalle weg en die willen ze niet verbinden met de nieuwbouwwijk.
eggie (2020-05-29 11:58:24+00:00): Ah.. Dan zal het highway=path zijn? (Bij geen bord)  
Een paaltje kun je taggen op een node verbonden met het pad.
barrier=bollard
De defaulttags zitten al ingebakken. 
Wanneer brom- snorfietsen er langs mogen dan tag je moped en mofa =yes , want die worden als motorvoertuigen gezien in osm.
Up to you.. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-05-29 10:47:56+00:00): Dag Gert-Jan..
Denk bij square aan het Rode Plein in Moskou

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsquare
Je plein heb ik even losgemaakt van wegen en gebouwen en de tagging omgezet naar leisure=playground. Je moet maar eens kijken.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-05-29 10:57:47+00:00): Dit waren je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85935663
Plakken aan wegen en gebouwen kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
eggie (2020-05-29 10:52:40+00:00): Dag gert-Jan,
De voorgaande mapper geeft aan dat ruiters zijn toegestaan. Op een fietspad is de default horse=no  vandaar dat de voorgaande mapper horse=yes tagt om de default te overrulen.
Dan klopt het bord NL:G9 ook niet, want dat geeft een ruiterpad aan. 
Dus zou nog even  kijken, want de tagging spreekt zichzelf nu tegen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-29 10:56:12+00:00): Dit waren je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85935984
Gert-Jan87 (2020-05-29 11:26:14+00:00): Het klopt dat over het grootste deel van het fietspad ruiters zijn toegestaan. Toch staat er vlak voor- en na het ecoduct een bord dat het daar niet mag. Wat mijns inziens heel kinderachtig, waarschijnlijk om dieren die over het viaduct gaan niet te verstoren. Maar ik denk niet dat ruiters zich iets van de borden aantrekken...

https://www.google.nl/maps/@51.9617105,5.1178442,3a,20.8y,23.95h,87.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1st52_AcrSgfc3XV8PoZs4yg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

en

https://www.google.nl/maps/@51.9652005,5.1143045,3a,15y,98.19h,89.27t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXpX5h0GeImFlFwrxe7mcBw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
eggie (2020-05-29 11:42:34+00:00): Lastig..
Dan het verkeersbord aanpassen.. ?

Einde ruiterpad NL:G10  betekent niet dat een ruiter niet verder mag, maar als het een G11 fietspad is dan is horse=no default.
Je zou dan wel via de berm verder mogen, maar daar is geen ruiterpad ingetekend. 
In de praktijk gaan die ruiters of op het fietspad verder of in de berm (toegestaan)
Lastig mappen.
Er zijn overigens ook ruiterkaarten (met ruiterroutes) . Dieren verstoren??  Geen idee. 
Wanneer je de vraag op het forum zou zetten hoe dit te mappen krijg je zeker antwoord.
PeeWee is bezig met ruiterkaarten.
Inlog identiek aan OSM account
Zou het even aan PeeWee voorleggen hoe het op te lossen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=18133 
Het is ook jouw forum.. dus gewoon doen.
Over dat door de berm verder gaan loopt ook ergens een draadje. 
Advies... het forum.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-05-29 11:51:12+00:00): Maar even zelf vast op het forum gezet.. je kunt hier aanhaken als je dat wilt.. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=788887#p788887
eggie (2020-05-29 13:01:08+00:00): Gert Jan.. Je zou in ieder geval weer horse=yes terug kunnen zetten om de routering te herstellen. Einde ruiterpad betekent niet een ruiterverbod. Het zal wel te smal worden voor een ruiterpad in de berm.
Zie ook advies forum.
eggie (2020-05-29 13:42:52+00:00): horse=yes heb ik in ieder geval al hersteld tbv de routering.
Het is in ieder geval de bedoeling dat het routeert. Er is geen ruiterverbod. 
Zie voor revisie advies draadjes op het forum.
Gr eggie
hsc666 (2020-05-29 13:45:39+00:00): Hallo osd11 und willkommen bei OSM!

Du hast mit Deiner Änderung den Weg für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer außer Radfahrer gesperrt - einschließlich Fußgänger. Auch die Bewohner der vier Häuser in Raßmannsdorf dürfen jetzt nur noch mit dem Rad auf den Weg. Das sieht alles nicht sehr stimmig aus. Wie ist die Beschilderung vor Ort? Und surface=asphalt passt auch nicht mit tracktype=grade3 zusammen. Bitte korrigiere Deinen Eintrag!

Bei Fragen melde Dich einfach wieder hier im Kommentar zum Changeset!

VG
hsc666
osd11 (2020-05-29 15:21:20+00:00): Änderung wurde angepasst.
artem95vlasovets (2020-06-03 11:33:39+00:00): Hi! You added a lot of schools, parks  and hospitals. Could you provide more details about these additions? Perhaps you have sources confirming the existence of these objects? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85936342
eggie (2020-05-29 11:09:35+00:00): Oke... Ik denk dat maxspeed 60 eraf kan. 
Het gedeelte over het erf is denk ik geen gras. Dus de weg splitsen en surface=grass aan de noorzijde verwijderen en vervangen door iets anders. Dan kan daar de tracktype ook anders zijn.
tracktype=grade1 is bv asphalt beton, grade2 is gravel enz. Zie wiki.
Aan de zuidzijde kun je op een node verbonden met de weg een hek plaatsen barrier=gate (met accesstags) 
Wanneer het echt prive is is access=private oke. Wanneer er recht van overpad is dan foot =permissive
motor_vehicle=no anders gaat het voor auto's routeren en dat moet even niet. 
Succes,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-29 11:10:04+00:00): Je tags https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85936732
eggie (2020-05-29 11:29:37+00:00): Access tags lijken me oke..
Gr eggie
DSem (2021-01-15 15:16:54+00:00): Доброго дня,
А на якій підставі Ви зробили висновок, що тут можливо їхати тільки прямо?
Mariia_K (2021-01-18 08:56:09+00:00): Доброго дня! Інформацію було надано логістами та водіями які користуються цією дорогою. Звірялась із іншою картою і по знакам - тільки прямо чи направо, поворота наліво немає. https://www.google.com.ua/maps/@49.2326976,28.4929928,3a,40.6y,41.7h,90.09t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sm7WczdDRTu0vj5qgo4x21Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
DSem (2021-01-18 11:26:12+00:00): Доброго дня,
Мені не зрозуміле обмеження "no_right_turn" з "Брацлавська вулиця" на "Данила Нечая вулиця" - на жаль зараз я не можу це перевірити, але ще рік тому там поворот був дозволений, та ніякого сенсу в його забороні я не бачу.
А стосовно знака 4.4 (Рух прямо або праворуч), що у вашому посилані - під ним табличка "7.5.1 Вид транспортного засобу". У такому випадку цей знак тільки для вантажних автомобілів. Та й такого обмеженя не замаплено.
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2020-11-25 15:51:26+00:00): Hello, I don't think a church should be mapped as tourism=apartment
"The tag tourism=apartment is used to map a holiday or vacation apartment: a furnished apartment or flat with cooking and bathroom facilities that can be rented for holiday vacations"
aachso (2020-05-29 13:33:22+00:00): Hello, why did you not draw this service road until the end, as the aerial imagery shows this road extends further (to house number 11)?
user_10219382 (2020-06-03 11:35:15+00:00): Hi aachso,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edits based on the driver feedback and available resources. I have not extended the road since the part of the road is covered by vegetation and it is passing over a stream. we have no ground resources to modify the stream, and extension of the road might create the geometry misalignment as it is partially covered by vegetation. it can be helpful if the local knowledge can improvise our edits. please go ahead and make the necessary changes or do let me know the modifications required. always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
kusweta
aachso (2020-06-03 15:33:04+00:00): In such cases please add fixme=continue to the last node and describe this issue in a note key, allowing other mappers to see the reason you didn't continue the way.
eggie (2020-05-29 11:27:54+00:00): Dag E De Beer.. Lijkt mij oke.. op het hek kan ook nog access private

Mvg
Eggie
user_5359 (2020-06-01 04:41:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.
user_5359 (2020-05-29 20:57:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Rainero (2020-06-16 16:35:06+00:00): Hello tnayini,
may I ask what is the source for this mapped path?
This path is located on a private property and is closed with a gate.  I doubt you were on location or have good pictures. Also check the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway , such paths leading to only a few buildings should be mapped as hw=service + service=driveway; in this case also with barrier=gate and access=private from the gate.
Best regards,
Rainer
tnayini (2020-06-17 08:51:07+00:00): appreciating your time for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the highway tag of this segment . Please find the changeset(86762216) for the suggesting modifications.i will take this as a learning from the community.  Always happy to learn from the community
Rainero (2020-06-18 21:22:03+00:00): Hello tnayini,
thank you for applying the precisations. The gate was still missing, I have added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86786371.
Bye, Rainer
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-14 08:44:23+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7569126213 is placed correctly?
trigpoint (2020-05-29 13:07:29+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. I think this edit has gone a little wrong.

What evidence do you have that suggests that it does not exist as whilst the area is shown as farmland on bing imagery, this is old. More recent imagery shows it clearly?

Cheers Phil
Shifnal Jake (2020-05-29 13:20:45+00:00): Hi Phil

I live directly opposite the non-existent road. I can assure you it's not there!
trigpoint (2020-05-29 13:36:46+00:00): I can see what has happened. The estate was drawn roughly before imagery was available and is a bit out of alignment. That road was added later in the correct place, but is Almond Avenue which is obviously a duplication.

I will align it all properly.

Thanks Phil
trigpoint (2020-05-29 14:50:32+00:00): Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85951687
Shifnal Jake (2020-05-29 18:12:02+00:00): Great edits, thanks for updating. It's a lot more representative now.

However, there are still some inaccuracies. For example, the path that leads from the end of Almond Avenue to Haughton Road doesn't connect directly with Haughton Road: there is another path that runs parallel to Haughton Road and it joins that.

There are other edits required, too. I'm new to OSM and I can't seem to find any option to enable a reliable overlay for tracing and editing purposes, otherwise I'd make the changes.
trigpoint (2020-05-29 18:43:12+00:00): Hi Jake
In the iD editor the 4th button down gives you a selection of imagery layers which can be used. Maxar looks good here, but you do need to look through them to see which works best. 
The map is always going to be a representation of reallity, the path from Haughton Road looks like it goes straight into the pavement at the end of Almond Avenue. The pavement (sidewalk in OSM) is effectively a property of Almond Avenue. If you were to map it separately you then get into the problem of connectivity for routers. For example you want a router to send a pedestrian along the path, not around the road.
Have a go at improving things, the best mapping is always going to be from someone on the ground. You are welcome to ask if you have any questions.

Cheers Phil
Shifnal Jake (2020-05-29 20:42:24+00:00): Thanks Phil.

I was using the layer option, but my choices are limited to Standard, Cycle Map, Transport Map and Humanitarian.

I'll continue getting a feel for it and see what other options I can unlock or unearth.

Cheers
Jake
Shifnal Jake (2020-05-29 21:18:17+00:00): Okay, we're getting somewhere! The correct footpaths and driveways are starting to come together. It's pretty easy and intuitive to use. Many thanks for the guidance, it's greatly appreciated.
wies1 (2020-06-02 10:52:53+00:00): Ok. Wie kann ich mir jedoch den Nibeungensteig als Wanderweg bei OSM anschauen, wenn ich nicht angemeldet bin und auch den o.g. Link nicht kenne? Bei Eingabe "Nibelungensteig" in der Suchfunktion wurde mir die Relation, welche unter dem o.g. Link sichtbar wird, nicht angezeigt.
Connecticut (2020-06-02 11:15:47+00:00): sucht, findet und sieht man zB hier:

https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=109376&map=14!49.6297!8.8867
Frans S (2020-06-07 12:53:34+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping
P;ease tag buildings just as building=yes
No names or area.
Only when you have local knowledge name places like shops restaurants etc.
Best regards and keep mapping
Mark R Naird (2020-05-29 14:45:12+00:00): Please don't map with low quality. Building should have straight outlines.
Jrachi (2020-12-24 13:28:28+00:00): Ho corretto i tag sul ponte.
Non esiste highway=bridge!
Si mette:
Highway=path (è su un sentiero)
bridge=yes (ci sono alcuni specifiche per i vari tipi di ponte ma su un sentiero nel dubbio basta "yes"
layer=1
Questo è importante perché indica che si passa sopra a qualcosa (in questo caso un rio)