piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
2maxic (2016-05-06 18:45:05+00:00): Я беру за основу валидатор.
http://wowik.000space.com/routes/ru-sve/2.htm
Теперь он ругается на несогласованность отношений. Просьба к str74 пояснить свою логику в изменении ref съездов развязок. В беседе вроде бы договорились брать за основу данные Росавтодора. Р-354 начинается с 32+400 км. Зачем у развязки на 31 км ref Р-354? На съезде обхода Камышлова ref не установлен. Не понимаю.
dieterdreist (2018-09-03 10:42:41+00:00): Hi, I have noticed you added bridge=yes to a man_made=bridge at Ponte della Magliana, but these objects are actually bridges. The tag bridge=yes is a property that says something is _on_ a bridge
choess (2018-09-03 16:10:45+00:00): Hm. The wiki says that it's OK to use "bridge=*" on "man_made=bridge" to convey its type/properties, but obviously "bridge=yes" is a bit redundant in that context, so I don't object if you revert.

The tagging required to tie together ways and bridges really could stand to be revisited, but given the community's lack of interest in ontology, I don't really see the point of doing so.
dieterdreist (2018-09-03 16:16:19+00:00): I certainly wouldn't have objected to bridge=<something>, although I believe we need at least 2-3 attributes to state the kind of bridge (load bearing concept / structure, material, amount of sections, ...). I have been adding wikidata and wikipedia references to a few bridges (to the man made bridge objects / outlines) as well as the start_date and structural engineers.
naoliv (2016-05-05 20:33:31+00:00): Daniel, porque você apagou as pistas de taxiamento no aeroporto?
Daniel Guilherme Marques da Silva (2016-05-05 20:54:40+00:00): Pois não são pista de taxiamento homologadas, na verdade essas em específico só são utilizadas para operação de planadores.
franzpc (2016-05-06 15:32:48+00:00): No presenta conectividad.
dadavid (2025-05-07 11:22:44+00:00): Hi odna, 

lange her, aber das maxweight:conditional hier [1] war als maxspeed:conditional gemeint, oder? :) 

Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415869298

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072183365

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530420909
odna (2025-05-13 18:37:20+00:00): Hallo David,

😄 Ja, das ist garantiert ein Fehler! Aber irgendwie kreativ: "Mo-Fr nur 30 Kilo!"
LoL

Danke fürs sichten und korrigieren!

Viele Grüße 
Odna
user_5359 (2016-05-15 17:03:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice a runway isn't a footway
mavl (2016-05-06 16:38:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не удаляйте, пожалуйста, пробелы между номерами домов и номерами корпусов. Использование пробела в этом случае полностью соответствует соглашению о заполнении тега addr:housenumber [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr].
user_5359 (2016-05-16 15:27:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4105632189 ? Can it bee the same restaurant?
CoolCanuck (2016-05-05 22:37:13+00:00): Please do NOT delete unless you 100% know the land owner does not want to rebuild after the fire.
DenisCarriere (2016-05-15 22:31:17+00:00): @CoolCanucks Try not to remove any previous information. If you want to follow the Fort McMurray building task, please read the instructions here:
http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/22
CoolCanuck (2016-05-15 22:47:42+00:00): Denis, please accept my sincere apologies. I asked on the IRC chat room and the action I did is what I was told. I am very sorry. I have made a note and will work on the other two places I did the same to. Thank you for the project link. I will check it out. 

Again, sorry. Thanks for the information!
DenisCarriere (2016-05-15 23:00:26+00:00): No worries, I re-added the building and added the damaged tags.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155735909
Thanks for your support with the OSM edits, I know you had the best intentions.
user_5359 (2016-05-09 17:43:08+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Den Namen des Museum mit einem Punkt zu überschrieben, nach dem das arabische Wort für Diakonie Deine erste OSM-Änderung war, ist nicht besonders nett. Über den Link "Chronik anzeigen" (unten rechts) kann man sich vergangene Werte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3432190041/history) ansehen.
bety1967 (2016-05-05 23:35:53+00:00): La zona seleccionada es la que se encuentra inundada por las recientes crecientes y subidas del rio Paranacito.
AgusQui (2016-05-07 03:10:38+00:00): Puedes usar Umap para indicar las zonas de inundación: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
FTA (2016-05-07 23:52:25+00:00): Hi, is there any way you can confine edits across the world to separate changesets? It's difficult see what exactly was changed when the bbox covers nearly all longitudes.
DannyAiquipa (2016-05-10 15:17:51+00:00): Hey! I was fixing short issues. However, I think because of the internet speed issue, I could have mistaken some layers. I will be careful next time. Thanks for your feedback
naoliv (2016-06-28 13:25:28+00:00): Danrley, faixas de ônibus e táxi não devem ser mapeadas separadamente, a não ser que exista um canteiro ou outro tipo de separador.
Também é útil colocar uma descrição do que você fez em suas edições, para que os outros mapeadores entendam o que aconteceu.
pfg21 (2016-05-11 08:44:18+00:00): Не надо писать в name вид магазин. то что он книжный магазин уже говорит тег shop=books, добавление name="Книжный магазин" излишне и захламляет внешний вид карту.
учти плз на будущее
Stalfur (2016-05-06 21:13:36+00:00): I don't think this did what it was supposed to do
Supaplex (2016-05-06 08:06:35+00:00): 私人住家不適合放在公開性質的OpenStreetMap地圖上
amtingj (2016-05-22 09:07:51+00:00): Moin Michael,
die Streckensperrung / der Ausbau läuft ja auf dem gesamten Stück Leibelbach-Häuslingen, dementsprechend hätte ich das auch komplett als Baustelle markiert. Hat es einen Grund, dass du nur Teilabschnitte als "im Bau" gekennzeichnet hast?
Gruß, Jörn
D91596Michael (2016-05-22 13:31:42+00:00): Hallo Jörn,

stimmt, bei den bereits vorhandenen Streckenabschnitten wird zumindest der Straßenbelag erneuert. Ich markiere die anderen Streckenabschnitte ebenfalls als "im Bau".

Viele Grüße aus Burk,
Michael
amtingj (2016-05-22 13:40:45+00:00): Hallo,
da die Sperrung ja die ganze Strecke betrifft und voraussichtlich bis Herbst 2017 bestehen bleibt, denke ich auch, dass das gerechtfertigt ist.
Schönen Sonntag noch!
letihu (2017-01-17 19:14:30+00:00): Es überschneiden sich folgende Gebäude.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415744824/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415947507/history.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415744821/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415947503/history
Die Luftbilder sind von 2017 und könnten vielleicht verwendet werden.
freeExec (2016-05-06 10:57:12+00:00): Наверное его ни кто не знал. Молодец, что добавили, но если бы посмотрели на соседние дома, то увидели, что буква в номере (если есть) ставится без пробела и заглавная. Поправьте.
freeExec (2016-05-06 11:03:16+00:00): Ограничение в 20 км вы сами придумали или там и правда знак висит?
Во-вторых дорога не должна быть "приклеена к зданию".
В-третьих, это не улица, а подъездная дорога и должна обозначаться как и соседние service.
Ну и наконец, все дороги по-умолчанию считаются НЕ односторонними, поэтому это свойство лучше не трогать.
Reitstoen (2016-05-11 18:04:38+00:00): Which renders?
Now it's a mess with many overlapping ways.
Peter Bremer (2016-05-17 07:02:11+00:00): There were quite a few. I remember OSMBuildings and OSM Analytics didn't show the building at all, there was one that only showed the main tower, there were a few more that also had problems, but I don't remember the details of them. Can you specify what makes a mess?
mavl (2019-01-11 17:01:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-11 17:01:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-11 17:01:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-11 17:01:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
literan (2016-05-06 12:20:49+00:00): Не надо в тег name писать всякий спам. Ни одного слова - названия не вижу, так что это поле удаляю.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:17:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:17:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
MKnight (2016-05-28 08:55:36+00:00): Was hats denn mit dem track p17 auf sich? der verdoppelt vorhandene Strassen und Wege.
MKnight (2016-05-28 08:56:23+00:00): Siehe auch: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.87115&lat=51.11792&zoom=16&overlays=duplicate_ways
BeKri (2016-05-06 14:00:08+00:00): Servus,
willkommen bei OSM.
Kleine Frage: Warum ist für Dich der Alte Bahndamm bei Gröbenzell ein Historic Monument ?
Hällst Du es für so herausragend das es in der Karte explizit erscheinen muss ?
Ich kenne die Teile und halte sie letztlich für Vergangenes, bei dem keiner Lust/ Geld hat es "wegzuräumen"
Gruss derBeKri
kayle (2016-05-06 09:47:11+00:00): Ahoj, vitaj v OSM. Poteší keď pribúdajú nové POI, ale tento hotel už je pekne dlhú dobu (podľa histórie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100049582/history od januára 2012) v dátach zaznačený. Ak to aplikácia maps.me nezobrazuje, treba napísať im, že tam majú chybu pri spracovaní OSM dát.
highflyer74 (2016-05-06 09:21:56+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Mir fiel auf, daß bei diesem Haus zwar die Adresse hinzugefügt wurde, aber das building=* Tag entfernt wurde. War das beabsichtigt...? Für ein Einfamilienhaus würde "detached" gut passen.

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Micha-San (2016-05-06 12:11:52+00:00): Moinsen,
nein, das war nicht beabsichtigt. Ich hatte noch den Unterschied zu "residential" nachgelesen.
Danke für den Hinweis, ist korrigiert
zstadler (2017-09-26 23:26:36+00:00): Hi,
.
In this edit you added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4169324780, but this gate is not connected to any footway or path.
.
Thanks!
Ynhockey (2017-09-27 20:44:51+00:00): I put a foot path there now, but don't remember which entrance exactly it connects to. Hopefully I am not in Beilinson again soon to find out!
zstadler (2017-09-28 11:44:43+00:00): Thanks!
I've connected the footway to the nearest road. Further tuning can be done in the future.
MichalP (2016-05-06 12:12:01+00:00): zdar MarioMrSK, prečo si zmazal časť Ahoj?
MarioMrSK (2016-05-06 14:45:09+00:00): Prepac, unahlene som to povazoval za vandalizmus. Vies to revertnut?
nahundfern (2016-05-13 21:34:57+00:00): revertiert da inkorrekt. Vor Ort ist keine Schneise, sondern ein befestigter geschotterter Weg! 
Zugangsbeschränkungen werden dagegen  ggf. mit access-tags gemappt.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-07-15 07:14:48+00:00): Hi Masan_DK, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've noticed that you have added overlapping buildings here in this changeset.  Can you take some time to cleanup these. Also, the "road" tag need to be changed to "residential" and should be connected to the main road.

Best,

Chetan
PlaneMad (2017-05-22 19:29:54+00:00): Thanks for adding the building heights! Were they supposed to be in metres? A height of 504m for a 25 floor building seems incorrect https://publicmap.github.io/#15.17/18.9851/72.8276/9.6/60
Derick Rethans (2016-05-06 10:11:00+00:00): Hi! And welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Your "test" removes some steps though, can you explain why you removed them? Please use descriptive change set comments, so we all can see what your intention was.

All data that you edit goes to the database immediately, so please be careful when editing.

Let me know if you have any questions (here, or through the messaging system), and I'm happy to help.

cheers,
Derick
blue butterfly (2016-05-06 10:57:12+00:00): hi! im just learning. I didn't realise my edits would change any thing. Im very sorry.
Derick Rethans (2016-05-06 11:02:14+00:00): Hi,

that's okay. Would you mind if I reverted your change? You seem to have changed some paths around Inner Temple Garden as well. The path now goes through the building :-)

Happy to help if you have any further questions!

cheers,
Derick
blue butterfly (2016-05-06 11:13:22+00:00): hi, 
please revert my changes back to the way they were. thank you.
literan (2016-05-06 12:26:36+00:00): Здравствуйте! пожалуйста, прочитайте здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/literan почему не нужно расставлять на дорогах/тропах теги bicycle=yes, foot=yes и т.п. - вы тратите это свое время, а опытные пользователи тратят время на их удаление. Спасибо!
tyr_asd (2016-06-03 18:38:26+00:00): Hey. What source did you use for the geometry of the BBT tunnel tracks?

PS: Could you please try to give more detailed changeset comments, especially if the changes aren't trivial (like here). Thanks!

PSS: Also, could you please try to re-use existing osm objects instead of deleting and re-adding them if possible? (That makes it much easier to investigate the respective object's edit history, for example to find out who added a specific tag and when.)
SWF8 (2016-06-06 08:47:59+00:00): The used sources are official plans, published by the Austrian Ministry for Transport, manually traced by myself, adjusted to world-mercator-coordinates and loaded to OSM.

https://www.bmvit.gv.at/verkehr/eisenbahn/verfahren/bbt/aenderungen2013/index.html
Commodoortje (2016-05-08 08:57:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416097596
Het is niet wenselijk om landuse vast te knopen aan highways of buildings.
Dit om toekomstige ongemakken te voorkomen. In werkelijkheid zullen deze landuse stroken niet tegen de highway of building zitten, maar iets er vanaf.
Commodoortje (2016-05-08 11:34:49+00:00): https://www.dropbox.com/s/z3z2mtewl03hzg8/2016-05-08_13-29-52.png?raw=1

Fietspad sloot niet aan op footway.
Ik het aangepast, als je het zelf zou willen doen, zal ik in de toekomst zulke correcties (nog) niet verrichten om op deze manier je de kneepjes van OSM te laten begrijpen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2816556983

Tevens heb ik de footway aangepast naar highway=cycleway ivm lokale kennis. Het is namelijk een verplicht fietspad.
eggie (2017-07-17 14:51:43+00:00): PB met opnieuw welkom gestuurd
jidanni (2024-11-08 12:18:42+00:00): addr:housenumber=3rd floor? Bad.
DP24PH (2024-11-10 03:49:57+00:00): Good day!

We need to consider correcting this into addr:floor for 3rd floor as addr:floor=3/F.


DP24
Bob Trafford (2017-05-11 15:40:16+00:00): Hi, looking to confirm the building at 10.45524, 14.23850 is BIR (Cameroonian military). Are you able to help me with that? How did you come to label it that way?
Rodrigo Rega (2016-05-08 13:22:52+00:00): ¿La calle que has añadido está comunicada con el camino cercano?

Aprovecho para darte la bienvenida a OSM, si tienes cualquier duda, me tienes a tu disposición.

Un saludo.
sommerluk (2016-05-07 22:55:07+00:00): Salut.

Ici tu a effacé par mégarde toute la rue de service (coté est) de la RNE. Ce n’est pas bien grave, je l’ai restauré. Quand-même il faut être un peu prudent, s’il te plaît, parce qu’il n’est pas toujours possible de restaurer des données.

Mais en tout cas becaup de courage pour tes contributions !

Excellente journée.
Rodrigo Rega (2016-05-08 13:31:21+00:00): ¿Esta nueva carretera que has añadido está comunicada con la que va por el Rato?

Si es así, te faltó unir ambas con un nodo común.
alphensebezorger (2016-05-07 05:49:12+00:00): Hallo Dutch Mapper,
zo te zien is hier per ongeluk een adres-node van Rodelaan 32 ca. 100m naar het noorden verschoven. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2704842324) Zie eventueel ook achavi: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=39141488. Leg jij die weer op zijn oude plek?
Aggregaat02 (2016-05-08 16:15:57+00:00): Ik heb het adres weer teruggezet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39184148
cadsauxk (2016-12-23 09:31:13+00:00): Por favor não remova as etiquetas de superfície surface=unpaved. Você tem consistentemente removido elas. Porque?
franzpc (2016-05-06 15:15:34+00:00): No tiene conectividad.
Aggregaat02 (2016-05-06 12:53:39+00:00): Sorry, voor het gebruiken van de Google-maps overlay, ik was vergeten dat dat niet mocht.
Jothirnadh (2016-05-11 06:04:31+00:00): It's good that you want the data to be updated, but it's not advisable to add data from a google overlay. Please revert these changes so that it will not cross the OpenStreetMap data violations.
Aggregaat02 (2016-05-11 10:52:17+00:00): Sorry that I've used the Google maps-overlay, I did not think that it was not allowed. I will be there from now on look out for.
Jothirnadh (2016-05-16 04:27:45+00:00): Thanks for your kind response.
Happy mapping!
vramirez122000 (2016-05-06 15:26:29+00:00): Buen trabajo! Has contagiado la fiebre de mapero!
d1g (2016-05-06 23:07:21+00:00): Доброго времени суток! У меня возник ряд вопросов.

1. По какой причине архипелаг был удалён?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1268060/history

Замены никакой: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195048542 - в результате остров утонул

2. На основе чего Водник был объединён с соседними базами?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4055715

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4055718/history

3. Остров https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165938285 был как часть отношения

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3925944/history

возможно, не самый лучший вариант, но частично рабочий (Внутренние озёра показывались, лес показывался)

После ряда правок замены тегам не предоставлено, остров утонул

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165938285#map=15/51.6326/46.2688
d1g (2016-05-06 23:25:52+00:00): Для чего нужно было удалять отношение 1268058 чтобы создать почти такое же 6194177. 

Историю правок где теперь брать у 6194177?

Возможно, Potlatch 2 не лучший редактор для правки отношений.
d1g (2016-05-06 23:59:09+00:00): 4. Где теперь искать теги имён после http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1268058/history?
literan (2016-05-06 14:07:33+00:00): Если этот парк БЫВШИй, то на местности парка нет (т.е. там нет обслуживаемой территории для отдыха), и отмечать тегом leisure=park некорректно. Правильно это обозначить tourism=attraction. Прошу поправить самостоятельно (мне уже надоело ходить за вами и аналогичные случаи исправлять).
Dino Michelini (2016-09-19 06:54:09+00:00): Ciao conoscendo la zona mi sembra che tu abbia troppo generalizzato includendo come scrub (percorso 254425887) anche le zone dove è presente la pietra viva senza evidenziare il limite (cliff) della montagna. Nella zona è già molto difficile orientarsi anche a causa di fenomeni locali di deviazione magnetica se poi generiamo carte poco precise non facciamo che aumentare la confusione negli escursionisti.
d1g (2016-05-06 23:07:00+00:00): Какую смысловую нагрузку несут удаления объектов по возрастом 6-7 лет?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/222056/history - удалён (это продолжение https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38346977)
d1g (2016-05-06 23:33:21+00:00): У Волги (222056) были указаны названия на других языках. где их теперь искать?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416138649
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416138612
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416138542

вообще безымянные
d1g (2016-05-06 23:34:56+00:00): Что делать с такими правками другим участникам?
manings (2016-05-09 07:19:56+00:00): Is this a mistake?  The drain is 7km long straightline.
Nedim_ViKTZ (2016-05-12 12:28:47+00:00): Its correct... more, less :)
literan (2016-11-26 11:55:26+00:00): не совсем понимаю, по какому смещению ты правил квартал возле Охотного ряда, но от смещений, определенных по трекам (и, вот сюрприз, почти совпадающих с данными Адресного реестра), здания ушли метров на 10-15. Буду править.
emacsen (2016-05-07 11:24:22+00:00): What is this? It's a blank area? 

There are comments on your changesets, can you please reply to them? If not, then these questionable edits will need to be reverted.
naoliv (2016-06-09 12:31:33+00:00): zeninguem, para de ficar adicionando o nome da cidade entre parênteses.
mueschel (2016-05-08 12:07:38+00:00): Hallo,
das Cafe trägt den Key "amenity=toilets", mit leerem Wert. Kannst du das korrigieren?

Btw, sind die Toiletten wirklich öffentlich zugänglich oder nur für Kunden des Cafes? 

Gruß, Jan
Graf Westerholt (2016-05-08 12:55:38+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis; habe es korrigiert. Die Toiletten sind öffentlich zugänglich:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lübeck#Nette_Toilette
alemintaka (2016-05-07 06:50:12+00:00): Sinceramente non ho capito perchè hai ripeistinato la situazione precedente, il mio intento era quello di dividere il nodo tra via maritano e via monticello che non è giusto far coincidere e che infatti ho diviso lasciandoti la rotonda divisa in segmenti cosi' i tuoi autobus non avranno problemi, io modifico in funzione della navigazione e testo le modifiche che faccio, ti assicuro che le rotonde si possono fare benissimo in un solo segmento, tanto che c'e' il tasto apposito per arrotondare
Alecs01 (2016-05-07 09:29:01+00:00): Ciao, non è esatto, guarda qui: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=39033409 avevi fuso i pezzi della rotonda facendone uno solo (es questa way risulta cancellata: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125546263/history), modificando così anche le relazioni di tutte le linee che passano da lì. Non è un dramma, ma visto che qualcuno le ha mappate, mi sembra giusto cercare di tenerle corrette.
Glassman (2016-05-07 00:24:52+00:00): Is Kids and Kritters a business name? If so, please tag it appropriately. For example shop=pets name=Kids and Kritters.
trigpoint (2016-05-06 17:35:49+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
The Me Hotel is already mapped, although only as a restaurant and the node you placed is on the pavement outside the building. It would be good if you could add the hotel tag to the existing way and remove the node.
Also is the supermarket really called Tecko, should it possibly be Tesco?
Cheers Phil
PlaneMad (2016-05-09 07:16:40+00:00): Arefin, noticed that you might have removed the name of the road Tanzil Road from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180049225#map=14/25.7318/89.1967

Please check if it was an error.
FTA (2016-05-07 23:49:35+00:00): Hi, is there any way you can confine edits across the world to separate changesets? It's difficult see what exactly was changed when the bbox covers nearly all longitudes.
ridixcr (2016-05-20 16:46:25+00:00): Hey there!

I think it is a mistake that I committed layers,from now onwards not commit.

Thanks for your feed back!
ridixcr (2016-05-20 17:00:51+00:00): "Hey! there,
I'm not sure how this happened since I'm working with To-Fix Plugin, maybe I could have confused the layers while downloading data manually. I will be careful about my future editions. Thanks for your feedback"
malenki (2016-05-07 10:36:51+00:00): Die in diesem Changeset von
Meyra-Straße nach
Meyrastraße umbenannte Straße¹ heißt laut ALKIS vom NRW-Atlas zwar Meyrastraße, die digitale Grundkarte und die topografische Karte kennen sie aber als Meyra-Straße. Was stimmt?

¹ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25572657/history
bus-mt (2016-06-10 17:29:44+00:00): Vor Ort habe ich von der Mindener Straße aus kein Schild gesehen, an der Herforder Straße steht "Meyra-Straße". Die Bushaltestelle heißt trotzdem "Meyrastraße". Korrigiert mit Changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39935851
malenki (2016-06-10 19:13:36+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Korrektur
Namen von Bushaltestellen sind nicht unbedingt die zuverlässigsten Indikatoren:
Ich habe hier in der Gegend eine, deren Name von dem Verkehrsunternehmen in drei Varianten falsch geschrieben wird. ;)
malenki (2016-06-10 19:14:11+00:00): PS: Vielen Dank natürlich vor allem fürs Nachschauen!
Endres Pelka (2016-05-07 21:40:33+00:00): Please be careful joining ways which belong to boundary relations. This changeset broke boundaries of 4 neighbourhoods. I'm fixing them now.
anderfo (2016-09-27 11:43:33+00:00): Hei, 
ser du har satt bicycle=no på endel stier rundt Måløy. 
Er det virkelig forbudt å sykle der, eller har du misforstått taggen?

Access-tagger som bicycle, horse og foot blir dessverre ofte misforstått og brukt som "anbefaling" for disse framkomstmidlene, men taggene skal kun brukes for å fortelle om det er lov eller forbudt å gå/sykle/ri/osv.

Hvis du ønsker å fortelle om det er egnet med sykkel her, må du istedet bruke class:bicycle eller class:bicycle:mtb (men da bør du først lese deg opp på hvordan de brukes).

Forøvrig gå det an å ta en titt på wikien: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Mountain_biking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Anders