piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aweech (2021-11-13 01:55:19+00:00): Hi!
I'm answering the questions in the fixme tags that you added in this edit. For the school mapping question, it's preferred to use areas to map out school grounds. So when there is an imported GNIS point that duplicates a hand-drawn area like there was here, it's best to copy the GNIS tags over to the area and delete the imported node. 

As for that bitcoin spammer, enthusiasts will sometimes go around trying to add businesses that accept bitcoin even if they don't have physical storefronts so that they look better in search engine rankings. Most of the the time the best thing to do is remove the spam. Sometimes an online-only business can be tagged as an office or craft shop, so something like `office=beekeeping` or `craft=honey` for this one. But the location was wrong for this node, so I decided it wasn't worth keeping.

Thank you for your contributions!

Sincerely,
aweech
Xvtn (2021-11-13 02:05:45+00:00): Thanks for the explanation! I appreciate it.
aceman444 (2021-11-21 10:33:43+00:00): Pisete "JDM s.r.o. Hostel Madunice", ale nazov ste dali JDMR. A tiez sa hotel nenachadza v Maduniciach, tak odkial taky nazov? Mate nejaky hodnoverny zdroj?
aceman444 (2021-11-18 20:42:52+00:00): Zdravim, do toho DOMOSU sa da prist a kupit si zariadenie? Lebo napisali ste sklad, ale oznacili ako obchod.
aceman444 (2021-11-18 20:43:40+00:00): A tiez podla katastra patri tato budova do Madunic, nie Velke Kostolany.
aceman444 (2021-11-20 23:19:18+00:00): Zdravim, tieto Vase nazvy objektov vyzeraju presne ako skopirovane z Google maps. To je v OSM zakazane. Takze ich budem musiet vsetky odstranit. Neuvadzate ziadny zdroj, jedine Ortofotomozaika SR, kde nazvy nemozete firiem vidiet.

A ziadam Vas, aby ste uz nikdy nic z Google maps nekopirovali, inak OpenStreetMap len uskodite a mozete byt vykazany, kedze to je porusenie pravidiel OSM a majetkovych prav Google. Dakujem.

Som rad, ze ste aspon neodkopirovali bludy, ktore tam Google ma, ako obchody v strede cesty a pod. Aspon vidite, ze do Google Maps sa dostane lubovolny bordel, v OSM su nejake pravidla kvality.
voltairovicz (2022-01-24 17:50:22+00:00): Witaj, wszelkich obszarów, w tym wypadku parkingów nie sklejamy wraz z drogą, to utrudnia dalsze edytowanie, rysujemy je rzeczywiście w obszarze, w którym występują, potem trudno jest coś przesunąć bez ingerencji w przyklejone rzeczy. Zachęcam do odwiedzenia grupy na fb Open Street Map Polska bądź naszego discorda w celu innych wskazówek mapowniczych
peculiarmoose (2022-01-24 18:57:51+00:00): Hej, dzięki wielkie za radę, będę pamiętał w przyszłości :)
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
imxgo (2022-01-08 16:23:19+00:00): Was ist denn da so verdaechtig am Weg?
Bausparfuchs (2022-01-08 22:15:40+00:00): Ich hab den aufgrund von Luftbildern und Daten aus der Strava-Heatmap gemappt, war aber noch nicht vor Ort, um genaueres anzuschauen. D.h. wir wissen erstmal nix von dem weg und seinen Eigenschaften
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-03 07:01:37+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2998678 ?
NathT1 (2021-11-12 22:42:26+00:00): Etiqueté edificios en el pueblo de Cañuelas, en las afueras del sur del Buenos Aires.
AmyCupcake (2021-11-13 10:31:01+00:00): Does this organisation actually have an official English or Spanish name, I see on the website no English translation and on the spanish version and catalan version of the website it's styled as CÀMERESIACCIÓ without spaces
Dimitar155 (2023-10-01 17:23:00+00:00): Hello keithalleman,

Are those names real? It seems like using ref=letter would be better. If the names are signposted as "Plat T" for example, it would be nice to move them to name instead of sector:name. 

Happy mapping,
Dimitar
leftybender (2023-10-01 19:59:56+00:00): Thanks. The names are as they appear at the cemetery (painted onto the kerbs/curbs). I have moved them to the 'name' key.
Dimitar155 (2023-10-01 20:15:30+00:00): Thanks!
skquinn (2021-11-17 09:50:50+00:00): outline* (not sure how the heck I managed to typo/mis-enter this)
SomeoneElse (2021-11-13 21:28:11+00:00): Filled in gaps in 398069 North_Wales_Path
mvexel (2021-11-13 16:17:46+00:00): These names are going to trip up search services based on OSM data sending people to Main St on the cemetery instead of downtown :)
Seriously, I've seen this behavior. Perhaps `access` tags will help. I think the cemetery is generally open to vehicle traffic but `access=customer` or something like that may help.
leftybender (2021-11-15 19:59:35+00:00): Yes I agree, though I did not put "Main Street" in OSM; that name was already in, so whatever problems it causes have been problems for months or years. And the real solution, of course, is for the city not to give different streets the same name. I couldn't believe that when I saw it.
leftybender (2021-11-19 18:48:22+00:00): However, I do not want to use access tags to limit the roads in the cemetery just for the sake of routing apps. The cemetery is open to the public, and I would be afraid that using the access tag in OSM would create more confusion about that fact. That would be worse than having two Main Streets (and two Park Streets).
leftybender (2021-11-19 18:52:27+00:00): If you want real confusion, I just noticed that there is a Cypress Avenue in this cemetery and another Cypress Avenue in the cemetery over by the U. Every cemetery is required to have a Cypress Avenue?
mvexel (2021-11-19 20:29:33+00:00): Completely agree on the access tags. Although I think access is limited to certain hours? Don't they close the gates at night?

I think you are correct in assuming that every cemetery needs a Cypress Ave :D
skyper (2021-11-17 18:46:29+00:00): Hey m-gu-b
Hier hast Du vor dem Aufteilen nicht alle Relation geladen und dadurch diese beschädigt. Bitte achte darauf und entweder arbeite nur innerhalb des Downloadbereiches oder lade zu erst alle Eltern (Strg+Alt+D). Ich habe mir letzteres angewöhnt.
Habe es repariert
Grüße skyper

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113911309
Lee Carré (2021-11-13 08:35:35+00:00): ▪︎http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
▪︎what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-10 19:40:27+00:00): If there are duplicate ways one should be deleted
felipeeugenio (2021-11-14 18:43:56+00:00): Hola.
Una duda. El poniente y oriente del nombre de dónde sale? Cuál es la fuente?
blackboxlogic (2021-11-14 12:46:07+00:00): Part of the road you labeled sidewak=no has a sidewalk on the west side. I added it. Also, hi. -Alex.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113716707
archpdx (2021-11-13 00:47:16+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Can you specify why the road was incorrect? From the imagery it looks like this road connects to the houses on the other side of the stream.
Asane1 (2021-11-13 01:37:25+00:00): I don't even know if this is an actual street or a private road. There's definitely a fence/gate 20 feet away from NW David Hill Road. And it's not really something that most cars can drive on. But you are right about those houses (I run by there quite a bit and still have to figure out how people get there; maybe they are abandoned?). I'll run by there again tomorrow and have a better look.
Asane1 (2021-11-13 01:38:12+00:00): Also, if you think I made a mistake, feel free to ignore the change (is that possible?). I'm learning :)
archpdx (2021-11-13 06:20:07+00:00): Thanks for responding! Yeah, it looks like its pretty narrow so I would change this to a driveway and maybe changing the access to private if there is a gate there and/or is signed as private. Looking forward to your future contributions, it's nice to see some more mappers in Oregon!
Asane1 (2021-11-13 18:54:14+00:00): Done. Changed to private.
Glassman (2021-11-13 20:18:03+00:00): #TIP: In addition to the name, it good to add in the type of business. It could be a school or office from the sound of the name. Check wiki.openstreetmap.org for more help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113716796
Andrei Klopau (2021-11-14 18:43:32+00:00): G'day! Thanks for your contribution to the osm data. Please tell me why you excluded the inner elements of the borders of the city of Sukhum? According to local legislation, the city of Sukhum is not legally included in the region of the same name: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%BE-%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B5_%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%A0%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%90%D0%B1%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%8F
user_177389 (2021-11-14 18:57:20+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the hint. I will correct it.

Best regards
Mario
Dima179 (2021-11-22 16:49:20+00:00): this doesn`t look like a main line
alester (2021-11-22 19:09:13+00:00): Hi Dima179,
I'm confused why you think that. The rest of the E&N/SVI is tagged as usage=main, so this portion at the one end shouldn't be any different. The entire line is over 200 km long and is definitely a main line (with a branch to Port Alberni).
Dima179 (2021-11-22 19:19:11+00:00): The rest of the line is marked as abandoned - how can it be main?
Dima179 (2021-11-22 19:20:13+00:00): If you look at openrailwaymap, this tiny bit of rail looks very strange
radiotrefoil (2021-11-13 03:33:38+00:00): Whoops, idk what Level0 did but this needs reverting
Kovoschiz (2021-11-13 10:00:18+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`, only in `description:zh=`.
3ngineer (2022-01-18 08:00:50+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping power lines. I noticed you untagged a ref from a powerline, and moved it to your new parallel line, which is great. However, you forgot to also untag the voltage and cables. I'll fix it here. To visualize power data, visit openinframap.org
geoffengland (2022-01-20 12:33:56+00:00): Hi, IIRC I added that after I saw your comment (while working on something else nearby) about combing the lines into 1 way for simplicity. I got sucked into mapping the whole Coquitlam section of the line. I was not aware that website existed, very cool. Thanks for the feedback and the fix.
VictorIE (2021-11-25 05:55:36+00:00): **cough**

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001929758 and neighbours. :)

**cough**
VictorIE (2021-11-27 19:06:19+00:00): Fixed. You and b-unicycling had been mapping the same estate on the same day. :)
kawino85 (2021-11-13 11:29:55+00:00): What have you done here?
Jan Olieslagers (2021-11-13 13:05:11+00:00): Tried to get the runway references  correct. It is a hopeless mess, though - feel free to roll back.
Ser9ei (2021-11-13 15:26:25+00:00): Для дорог есть уточняющий тег smoothness=*, а не то, что вы сделали.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoothness

Лучше спрашивайте в телеграм-чате @ruosm, как обозначить что-то, чем делать такие правки.
kurguzov (2021-11-14 03:52:05+00:00): Если указать smoothness, то получится, что там хоть на велосипеде можно проехать, и это правда, но дорога там грунтовая, и при построении маршрута с учетом качества покрытия, хотелось бы, чтобы навигатор мог отдать предпочнтение параллельной асфальтированной дороге. Поэтому я хотел явно указывать именно тип дорожного покрытия, а не подходящий транспорт. Как это лучше сделать? (навигатор osmand)
Ser9ei (2021-11-14 08:38:49+00:00): Задавайте вопросы по тегированию на форуме или в телеграм чате @ruosm. Одно я знаю точно: никакой клиент, включая OsmAnd, не поймёт изобретённую вами схему тегирования. Тег name=* точно не влияет на навигацию.
DaveF (2021-11-14 13:37:56+00:00): Hi
All UK railway stations are mapped as nodes, to allow central accurate location.
There can only be one railway=station. There can be multiple building=train stations.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation#How_to_map
Ser9ei (2021-11-13 15:23:16+00:00): hw=track подразумевает, что это unpaved. для уточнения покрытия используется tracktype https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:tracktype
Если проезд регулярно используется и нужна маршрутизация, то внутри населённых пунктов лучше избегать hw=track. Тогда лучше заменить на hw=service + surface=unpaved тут уточнение покрытия будет оправдано.
PT-53 (2021-11-16 07:05:53+00:00): Hallo rainerU,
sind das
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001933870/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001933873/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001933871/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001933867/history
wirklich Fußgängerzonen oder doch nur footways ?

Gefunden mit OSMI:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highways&lon=9.68922&lat=48.23473&zoom=18&opacity=0.34

Grüße
rainerU (2021-11-16 08:39:13+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
ich bin mit hw=pedestrian auch nicht besonders glücklich, hielt es aber erst mal für besser als gar nichts. Es sieht auch auf der Karte nicht besonders gut aus.

Die Flächen zwischen den Gebäuden sind auf zwei Ebenen durchgehend, einheitlich und ohne Höhenunterschied gepflastert.  Der obere Bereich kann auch von Fahrzeugen befahren werden und ist nur durch Pfosten abgesperrt, d.h. keine Verkehrszeichen. An anderer Stelle habe ich solche Bereiche als Fläche vom Typ hw=pedestrian+area=yes und zusätzlich Linien vom Typ hw=footway/path gemappt. Das suggeriert Wege auf der Fläche, die nicht vorhanden sind. 

Kurz und gut: du kannst den Bereich gerne anders mappen. Ich habe auch Fotos auf Mapillary hochgeladen.

Grüße
Rainer
PT-53 (2021-11-16 10:30:57+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
ich mache da aktuell nichts, da ich keine Ortskenntnisse habe.
Solltest Du bei
highway=pedestrian
bleiben, dann ergänze doch bitte
noname=yes.
GRüße
BudgieInWA (2021-11-17 10:26:56+00:00): The name tag is specifically for proper names that are visible on the ground, or widely understood. Unless there is a plaque or something labelling this tree "Old Jarrah Tree" the name tag is not appropriate here.

General information that doesn't fit in other tags can go in the description tag if it is applicable for the map user, or the note tag if it is for other mappers (or the fixme tag if it is problem that needs addressing).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113719886
MaiaWilliams (2021-11-18 23:51:05+00:00): Okay, thanks :) I've been told it's the oldest jarrah tree on campus - pretty cool! I'll try to find a reference for that and put the info into the description field. But yes, I understand what you're saying about the name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113719886
MxxCon (2021-11-14 04:50:52+00:00): Hello.
If you want to reposition some feature, instead of deleting existing one and creating a new one, it's generally best to edit existing feature. This way you are preserving history of that feature.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113719905
BudgieInWA (2021-11-18 04:51:16+00:00): Great edits around UWA! A small details: benches (and any feature that is not a part of the path itself) should not be attached to the footway.

You can use right click -> "Extract" in the editor to place the bench next to the footway.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113719988
BudgieInWA (2021-11-18 04:54:02+00:00): You have mistakenly used the tag ford=yes outside the geography building. A ford is a place where water flows over a path. This intersection between two footpaths doesn't need any tag at all.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9247537174
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113720530
BudgieInWA (2021-11-17 08:40:47+00:00): We were talking about the gravel area[1] that JOSM was complaining about and I've done some thinking. From a routing perspective, the area should be treated as a footway, which tells us that highway=footway is the correct tag. The wiki[2] confirms that the tag can be used on an area (in the box on the right). So in this case, I would add highway=footway.

[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001966384
[2]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113721383
MaiaWilliams (2021-11-18 23:53:55+00:00): Yeah cool, okay. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113721383
rthik007 (2021-11-15 06:54:06+00:00): "HI MJBersaldo,
I have removed and fixed the alignment of overlapping ways.
WAY: 1001967733.
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113788509.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113721491
highflyer74 (2021-11-13 08:41:39+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

In diesem Änderungssatz wurden zwei Objekte bearbeitet. Treppen in Frankreich und eine Buslinie in Polen. Letztere ist dadurch jetzt keine Buslinie mehr, da die Relation von =route auf =site geändert wurde. Kann es sein, dass dies unabsichtlich geschehen ist?

Generell sei so nett, Deine Änderungssätze ein wenig lokaler zu gestalten.

Da Du noch "neu" bist, sei so nett, Dir einmal folgendes durchzulesen:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Danke!
Gonéo (2021-11-17 12:18:25+00:00): Bonjour Géovélo,
Je crois que le cours Émile Zola a été amoché suite à ce changeset. Pourriez-vous le remettre d'équerre svp ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25809315
Gonéo (2021-11-17 12:20:08+00:00): Signalé par cette note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2938451#c6278483
Gonéo (2021-11-17 12:27:24+00:00): Idem pour la rue Saint-Michel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25809315#map=19/45.76816/4.87947&layers=D et la rue Anatole France https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122317544
cquest (2021-11-17 12:40:47+00:00): revert fait
simon_geovelo (2021-11-17 13:01:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour le revert. 
Je resensibilise notre contributeur qui déroge à nos bonne pratiques.

Simon de Geovelo
mueschel (2021-11-14 15:56:18+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong with this import - all the objects have several foreign tags, but no common OSM tag. Please check this and convert all the tags to documented ones.
plicploc (2021-11-15 14:33:25+00:00): Hi,
Yes sorry I'll edit in the coming days.
plicploc (2021-11-18 17:24:55+00:00): Should be OK now
ivanbranco (2021-12-30 21:08:29+00:00): Hi plicploc,

I think "titre=*" escaped your conversion :P seems like a name=*, can you check it out?
eggie (2021-11-13 09:35:43+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.

In OSM voegen we alleen bedrijven/winkels toe die een bezoekadres hebben. Is dat hier het geval?
Bedrijven worden verder toegevoegd op de bestaande adresnode. Dat is het pand ernaast. 
Dit hier is pand nr 25. 

MVG
eggie
user_12625593 (2021-11-13 18:42:13+00:00): Dit bedrijf had niet toegevoegd mogen worden, is een webshop vanuit huis. Ik verwijder het weer.
eggie (2021-11-13 19:00:03+00:00): PB gestuurd..
BCNorwich (2021-11-13 10:10:11+00:00): Hi, From the imagery the houses look like they have pitched roofs so the tag would be roof:levels=1
Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels

Regards Bernard.
TJ-45 (2021-11-13 11:56:48+00:00): I see now, thanks. I thought it meant levels with windows.
kubahahaha (2022-04-02 23:48:50+00:00): Usuwam nieistniejący adres - Wieniawska 11 w Lublinie.
Ten adres był już wcześniej usunięty, słabo z weryfikacją importu :/
habi (2021-11-17 14:43:16+00:00): Hey!
You've added "coordonnees=	[50.6564301,5.5619057]" to this node, which doesn't make sense in OpenStreetMap, since the node *is* already at that location.
Also, it is necessary to add the (address) tags in English, otherwise it doesn't make sense.
Can you correct this?

Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
plicploc (2021-11-18 17:27:44+00:00): Hi,
Should be OK now.
habi (2021-12-06 20:16:33+00:00): Thanks for correcting it!
who_i_am (2021-11-13 09:09:37+00:00): 东环路
ftcat (2021-11-13 09:16:33+00:00): Hi debrahkapemba,

This area is a very remote part of a remote National Park there will be no culverts unless on major roads, many are just tracks
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 09:46:50+00:00): Ci risiamo con i revert? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/826951922

contact:instagram è il tag giusto per gli account Instagram, non website

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9155369400

Avevo corretto l'orario togliendo ";" alla fine

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974093694

Hai trasformato una piazza da area a nodo comportando una perdita di dettaglio
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 10:53:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8269519227

Mi era partita una cifra dall'esempio di Instagram
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113723570
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 10:04:02+00:00): Un altro revert.

Non c'è bisogno di discutere qualcosa di palesemente sbagliato:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele
Cito: "OpenStreetMap does not try to be a general elevation database so you should not tag elevation of nodes with no other tags and no specific meaning that suggests an elevation value is significant information in this case."
Ripeto: "you should not tag elevation of nodes with no other tags".

Hai eliminato attraversamenti pedonali (tra cui uno contenente informazioni utili ai disabili) come nodi. "Preferred method for tagging a marked crossing as a way": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Marked_crossing_example.png

Martino, la prassi dovrebbe essere che tu leggi la Wiki prima di utilizzare un tag, e poi procedi alla modifica. Non che procedi all'eliminazione e devono essere gli altri a convincerti citandoti la Wiki.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113723818
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-24 00:09:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120107886 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some personal markers in Ukraine
Ser9ei (2021-11-13 15:18:33+00:00): Удаляя объекты, смотрите на теги. Тут вместе со строением удалён и номер дома, который, скорее всего, останется прежним при строительстве нового объекта. 
В таких случаях надо использовать либо префикс: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%8B_%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0

либо перенести адресную информацию на точку на месте бывшего строения.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-21 21:19:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9247890184/history has X=610191,285 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
abakus_uploader (2021-11-13 23:30:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!