piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2021-02-08 12:14:22+00:00): Hola. Hay un tag que es building:levels, para poner los pisos de altura de las casas. por si conoces el sector y aprovechar de hacerlo ahora. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98870414
Carnildo (2021-02-09 07:14:50+00:00): How about we call it the "Elko-Roosville Highway", since that's what the BC government seems to call it: https://web.archive.org/web/20170105151258/http://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/transportation-reports-and-reference/numbered-routes#
DENelson83 (2021-02-09 07:32:36+00:00): Yeah.  I just changed it to that.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98936870
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:41:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
mueschel (2021-02-11 14:19:36+00:00): 
Hi,
you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.


descripción 
nombre
numeros
número
Números
números
1zeqp4uq (2021-02-09 09:01:02+00:00): Эта дорогу реконструировали летом 2020, удалите пожалуйста исправление!
andi9876 (2021-02-09 00:30:53+00:00): hospital listed already and no nursing home here.
deleted
dns10 (2021-02-08 04:40:38+00:00): This road has been blocked off and there is no through traffic here. This was a permanent change when Fulton and Lorain Ave slip lane was reconfigured in 2019 . Please do not revert as this section is entirely disconnected for automobiles between W. 38th and Fulton.
soundred (2021-02-08 05:59:35+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit. Apologies for the wrong edit. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
soundred.
dns10 (2021-02-08 22:14:48+00:00): No worries!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:24:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
andi9876 (2021-02-09 00:18:24+00:00): no nursing_home here.
deleted
andi9876 (2021-02-09 00:17:22+00:00): Dear, not name:en
Edited
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:34:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:34:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:28:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:39:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:54:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:27:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:44:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:27:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:28:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:30:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:35:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
martianfreeloader (2023-03-15 18:16:57+00:00): Hej,

this looks more like a ford than a bridge on the aerial imagery https://www.osm.org/way/904899701

Do you know that I bridge has been built here recently or is this a mistake?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:24:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
booktiger (2021-04-06 14:18:31+00:00): 不会编辑请不要乱编辑，删除起来很麻烦的
SomeoneElse (2021-03-14 14:25:15+00:00): Hello araash,
It looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858836013/history was added by someone accused of fictional mapping (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11940952 ) who I'm now reverting. Can you please check that any edits that you have made have not been unduly influenced by previous fictional changes by this mapper?
Best Regards,
Andy, from the DWG
maro21 (2021-02-08 23:31:40+00:00): Juglans regia is a species, not genus.
user_5359 (2021-02-09 05:08:06+00:00): Thanks for the hint, you are right.

And sorry for forgetting to save in between before I changed the fast food in Germany.
doublah (2021-02-11 12:35:44+00:00): Please refrain from adding fake names to places.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98880223
kguenther24 (2021-02-08 05:41:24+00:00): Sorry that you have to fix all of the stuff I did...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98880317
tastrax (2021-02-20 22:28:06+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Otenkiya (2021-06-27 03:00:18+00:00): 報告
本通りの対向分離編集に伴うウェイ: 本通り (904922136)の作成により、リレーション: 国道185号 (1282122)に断絶が発生。また当該ウェイがルートマスタリレーション: 国道185号 (9385500)に含まれていたため、ロール検証警告が発生。以上、修正済み。
Mauls (2021-02-08 13:14:29+00:00): railway:ref is the used internationally for station reference codes by OpenRailwayMap - ref:crs is a UK-specific tagging. What is the issue with having duplicate tagging?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:54:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
skquinn (2021-02-08 09:49:37+00:00): Instead of using way IDs which are cumbersome to look up, it would be better to describe the secondary_link add as "Added crossover for Mangum Road" i.e. refer to roads by name instead. Generally, we can see which ways are connected by looking at the changeset data itself.
kmarkish_lyft (2021-02-09 07:09:26+00:00): Hi, skquinn

My name is Katsiaryna and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for paying attention to this. Due to the peculiarities of our workflow, we are used to using ways' ID for a detailed description of the changes made, as the road doesn't always have a name, and also edits can include node changes. I will definitely take your advice into account and try to use another way to describe changesets whenever possible.

Thank you,
Katsiaryna.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 17:49:04+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/way/267826533/history: You forgot to add a value for roof:colour
lyctkel (2021-02-08 19:10:15+00:00): Hi user_5359,
Danke für den Hinweis.
It's fixed now.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:47:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
user_5359 (2021-02-11 19:48:34+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set.
ALAND20=3467616
AWATER20=2156370
CLASSFP20=U2
FUNCSTAT20=S
GEOID20=1543250
INTPTLAT20=+21.6455445
INTPTLON20=-157.9228554
LSAD20=57
MTFCC20=G4210
NAME20=Laie
NAMELSAD20=Laie CDP
PCICBSA20=N
PCINECTA20=N
PLACEFP20=43250
PLACENS20=02414082
STATEFP20=15
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
fkv (2021-10-14 01:28:34+00:00): Du weißt ja nicht einmal selber, was du willst. Kein Name, aber Adjektiv auf Großschreibung ändern. Darüber kann man nur den Kopf schütteln.
stefanct (2021-10-14 04:53:52+00:00): Am Satzanfang schreibt man in im Deutschen üblicherweise groß. Und die Grotte hat keinen Namen. Was soll dein  Kommentar bewirken, außer mir Zeit zu stehlen?
fkv (2021-10-14 06:31:16+00:00): Wer stiehlt da wem Zeit? Einen Satzanfang gibt es nur in einem Satz.
Kevin Kofler (2021-10-14 13:20:36+00:00): Wenn du das Changeset genau anschaust, siehst du, daß da name="ehem. Badegrotte" auf description="Ehemalige Badegrotte" geändert wurde, da ging es also nicht nur um die Schreibweise des Adjektivs (das übrigens auch, entgegen der in der OpenStreetMap üblichen Richtlinien, abgekürzt war).
fkv (2021-10-14 17:22:53+00:00): Glaubst du, dass ich das nicht gesehen habe? Es gibt da 4 Aspekte dieses Edits: 1.) name ->description (beides hat Vor- und Nachteile), 2.) ehem. abgekürzt oder nicht (beides hat Vor- und Nachteile), 3.) Großschreibung, 4.) unabgesprochene Änderung, mit der nichts Neues beigetragen wurde, sondern nur Streit gesucht wurde. Was Punkt 2 betrifft, ist klar, dass die Empfehlung gegen Abkürzungen schon in name=* nicht immer Sinn macht (wer schreibt "Doktor" aus?) und in description=* sowieso nicht gilt. Mir ging es aber vor allem um Punkt 3. Wenn jemand meint, etwas ohne Absprache "korrigieren" zu müssen, dann sollte er es wenigstens richtig machen und nicht Fehler hineinmachen, die vorher nicht waren.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Uralla (2021-02-08 08:42:24+00:00): В чем смысл обводить одно дерево десятком точек, но лес вокруг оставить неотрисованым?
user_5359 (2021-02-08 17:23:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please read the comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98774925. There are reason, why we delete your node. And know you delete the corrected information and spam again! Please stop this. If the node with the corrected information is wrong placed please move the node, but don't destroy the work other OSM guys!
clay_c (2021-02-21 19:18:13+00:00): Reverted in changeset 99695147. Tagging the track segments that support freight trains as railway=light_rail is incorrect because those particular tracks are built to a higher standard and support heavier trains. Light rail trains (route=light_rail) may travel on railway=rail in certain cases such as this one.
Uralla (2021-02-08 08:40:47+00:00): area=yes
barrier=ditch зачем оно?
Andrey Krivko (2021-02-08 08:43:51+00:00): Я не знаю о чём Вы. Как посмотреть конкретнее? Куда нажать?
Uralla (2021-02-08 08:45:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904946769
Andrey Krivko (2021-02-08 08:48:17+00:00): Я просто мотоциклист (Эндуро), а такой ров хороший ориентир + весной по нему бежит вода. Ну и иногда он представляет опасность. спасибо :-)
Andrey Krivko (2021-02-08 08:54:46+00:00): Можете написать мне в вотсап. Если хотите. +79058125555 Андрей
Uralla (2021-02-08 08:56:47+00:00): Оформляй пожалуйста согласно соответствующим тегам. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:barrier%3Dditch
Данные, несоответствующие действительности, все равно будут удалены, поэтому лучше сразу делать нормально иначе работа будет проделана впустую.
Uralla (2021-02-08 09:01:24+00:00): https://t.me/OsmUral здесь основной чат обсуждения вопросов по региону.
AkuAnakTimur (2021-02-08 14:25:33+00:00): Hello.

I wonder why tagging (name of) a mosque should be this way, instead of e.g.

1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5983916
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241107520

... instead? Is there a discussion going on somewhere?
AkuAnakTimur (2021-02-08 14:29:02+00:00): I provided those two examples, because I've been following the way how things were mapped (since I began mapping for OpenStreetMap in 2014).
CranaeIsland (2021-02-09 00:52:57+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur, thanks for reaching out and providing some examples of these types of features. 
I was initially following this wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship#How_to_Map) since there appears to be a larger campus for this place of worship and thought it would be better to represent the full property rather than just the building. 
What do you think? 
I’m happy to update the modeling to the same type as the examples you’ve provided if you think that is more appropriate.
AkuAnakTimur (2021-02-10 05:16:03+00:00): Hi. Many thanks for the reply.

My interpretation for the word mosque (or Masjid in the Malay language) has something to relate with (structured) buildings. Not the landuse surrounding the mosques.

This can be extrapolated to smaller mosques tagged as 'Surau's here in Malaysia.

Any further discussions, simply blast your questions.
CranaeIsland (2021-02-10 23:49:02+00:00): Thanks for the clarification! 
I’ve made the necessary update to add the name back to the building. 
Happy mapping :)
habi (2021-02-11 11:05:12+00:00): Ciao
I've changed `Was:building` in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665146517 to `demolished:building' (according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Префиксы_жизненного_цикла) since it is not visible on imagery anymore.

Greetings from Switzerland,
Habi

I became aware of this via http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
Tom Chups (2021-02-12 07:02:18+00:00): Hey! What is the fundamental difference?
I don't mind, I'm just curious. In my understanding, these prefixes are equivalent.
habi (2021-02-12 20:12:22+00:00): It seems to me that the building is not there anymore, so I think that 'demolished' suits it better than 'was', which according to the (English) wiki page is when something is repurposed, e.g. used for something else.
Most importantly in this case is that you capitalised 'Was', which made it show up on the new keys website.
Have a nice weekend,
Habi
Tom Chups (2021-02-15 06:14:45+00:00): Thanks I got it. I will consider in the future :-))
djsa (2025-10-27 15:23:50+00:00): Kan je je de bron van het Elfpad nog herinneren?