piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2020-12-15 13:57:56+00:00): Hello,

Can you explain why you are removing boundary segments from http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=5441968 ?  We will need to reinstate these.  
Also, can you explain the tag changes that you have made to http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=409267917 ?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-12-15 13:58:25+00:00): Bonjour,
Pouvez-vous expliquer pourquoi vous supprimez les segments de frontière de http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=5441968? Nous devrons les rétablir.
Pouvez-vous également expliquer les modifications de balises que vous avez apportées à http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=409267917?
Meilleures salutations,
Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail sur les données d'OSM.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-18 20:57:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 96090272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some likely accidental relation changes near Morocco.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95880188 for more details.
Omar DIDOUQEN (2020-12-18 23:09:11+00:00): sorry i just tried to correct some information because there is no country between Morocco And Algeria called Democratic Sahara the boundary inside Moroccan Sahara is just a security wall because of a terrorist group come from Algerian Boundaries
SomeoneElse (2020-12-18 23:16:47+00:00): Hello,
The current mapping in this area is the result of a community discussion, which resulted in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 .  If you think that the current mapping is incorrect then please do discuss with the rest of the OSM community - at the moment, the main talk list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk is probably the best place to do that.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
ibanez (2020-12-16 16:08:46+00:00): Gibt es einen Grund die geplante (proposed) Straße wieder auf unclassified zu setzen? Da ist definitiv nichts vor Ort bebaut und daher nur "proposed"
habi (2020-12-17 15:53:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
There's no concept of 'test' commits here; everything you commit is added to the database immediately :)
ENG3PLabs (2020-12-17 15:55:20+00:00): Haha I knew that. But because it was my first commit I thought I would ask for a review :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-18 20:57:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 96090272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some likely accidental relation changes near Morocco.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95880188 for more details.
opencarpatia (2020-12-22 02:34:29+00:00): Привіт, прошу підтвердити демонтаж шлагбауму на межі міста Вижниця (той що перед мостом біля КПП).
opencarpatia (2020-12-22 02:40:28+00:00): Мова йде про масивний стаціонарний подвійний металевий поворотний шлагбаум (не ворота). Пофарбований в червоно-білий колір.
Mariia_K (2020-12-22 12:12:29+00:00): Доброго дня! Декілька клієнтів користуються цим переїздом і стверджують що там нічого немає.
opencarpatia (2020-12-22 14:17:45+00:00): Дуже дякую за оперативну відповідь. Шлагбаум там точно був, тому його хіба встигли демонтувати.

Якщо ж він просто відкритий більшість часу - це не означає що його нема. В оригіналі тег General Access був проставлений у значення Yes.
Mariia_K (2020-12-22 15:11:37+00:00): Дякую за ваш коментар! Я ще дізнаюсь у водіїв чи він залишився, чи ні.
literan (2020-12-15 16:18:37+00:00): тег crossing=uncontrolled ставится на точку перехода, а не на линию дороги. Ознакомьтесь с вики, пожалуйста.
ff255 (2020-12-15 22:03:49+00:00): Ознакомился, но видимо не достаточно внимательно. Эх, придётся доознакамливаться, спасибо, что заметили :)
literan (2020-12-16 07:03:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing вот тут даже картинка есть с примером
eggie (2020-12-15 15:14:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review..
Je hebt het voetgangersgebied verwijderd op de markt in Breda. Het zal niet meer routeren.
Dat zal toch niet je bedoeling zijn.
landuse=retail is niet alleen de markt.
Beperk ook het gebied van je edits svp.

MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-12-15 15:20:14+00:00): Voetgangersgebied Grote Markt hersteld
Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95881061

MVG,
eggie
Narvik2 (2021-03-12 21:44:38+00:00): Szia!
Miért teszel admin_level=* címkéket templomokra? Az admin_level=8 városhatárok jelölésére való, nem templomokhoz.
eggie (2020-12-15 19:09:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2020-12-15 16:35:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here 
Please map only buildings since this is a building only project.
When you want to upload your mappings, check the issues on the issue triangle and solve these
Best regards and keep mapping
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-30 14:21:36+00:00): Hello JLOSM,

in this changeset you added tracktype=unpaved to highway=unclassified. Sure you meant to use tracktype here and not surface?

Cheers

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885139095/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884988723/history
JLOSM (2021-01-03 17:04:36+00:00): It was indeed surface, which has already been corrected.
Thanks for your notice.
Ticker Berkin (2020-12-17 08:33:20+00:00): Hi. Sorry if this is a repeat comment. I thought I'd commented yesterday but couldn't find it.
If you are still dealing with Hawk Conservancy can you tag the node on the area & main access road with entrance=main - see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7917318113/history
If you've finished I can do it in a while
Thanks
Ticker
guyporter (2020-12-17 14:55:41+00:00): Hello Ticker,
I’ve created an Entrance/Exit - Main at the location you specified - upon the node adjoining the access road and area.
Have a good day,
guyporter
HaPe-CZ (2021-02-24 21:50:15+00:00): tramvajové koleje na plánovaný dvorský most ... nebylo by lepší je označit jako plánované?
Martin2035 (2021-02-25 10:21:05+00:00): @HaPe-CZ já to vnímám tak, že jako plánované označujeme něco, co ještě nestojí. Tyto koleje už tam jsou v reálu (připravené na napojení mostu). Viz např. zde: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ea4jdaGXgAETxmG?format=jpg&name=large. Když tak můžu dokázat i fotkou.
HaPe-CZ (2021-02-25 10:34:03+00:00): nj, na leteckých snímcích to není tak mi to bylo nejasné, Ok
Martin2035 (2021-02-25 10:38:49+00:00): Jasné, v pohodě.
L'imaginaire (2020-12-15 16:35:07+00:00): Thanks!
p_anuram (2020-12-15 14:23:38+00:00): I live in this area & google maps already has this, please review.
itineris (2020-12-16 09:31:03+00:00): Szia!

A kerékpárútnál az 1-es alatt átvezető alagút is elkészült?
Másrészt pedig ha valami elkészül, akkor kérlek, töröld a construction címkét is!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
AndersAndersson (2020-12-15 20:15:17+00:00): A house address in a villages or hamlets is either Roadname 1 or Village 1. In this case its Nisshyttan X.
topius (2020-12-23 14:35:59+00:00): Hi. You laid this river over an existing but more poorly mapped creek. I will fix this, but please take care not to overlap rivers or roads over already existing features.
Nicxon Piaso (2020-12-23 23:14:49+00:00): Hi Topius,

Thanks for the correction.It was a mistake that I did as I was using the Android Phone app of the OSM on my OPPO phone.

Really, I did forgot to erase this as I was busy doing some other stuff in office and forgot that I had to erase this feature. Anyway, thanks for the correction as I was just doing a trial out the OSM android app( Vespucci) on the Phone to edit.

I am working around here but mostly am editing features around the Southern Highlands Province area.

Thanks for your correction and have a nice day.
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:34:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are rather fine . You include sometimes the courtyard into your mapped building. Keep an eye on the shadow of a building. There ends the building
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95882299
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:31:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors,  just do not forget to square each rectangular building
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95882400
WoodWoseWulf (2020-12-15 20:13:04+00:00): Please note that I have not personally reviewed or "approved" of these changes. I have merely told Gabriel0322 via private message that they should make honest and accurate changes to the map.
ElliottPlack (2020-12-31 05:26:12+00:00): These are not totally honest and accurate changes unfortunately. The problem here is using the recreation ground and access=yes tags on school grounds is disingenuous. School fields are typically public after school hours. The school grounds are not named things like "Southeast HIgh School Recreation Grounds". They are not named anything. (that one in particular isn't even on the SE high school property).

Adding the pitches is great, don't get me wrong, but don't imply they're publicly accessible when they're not. You can, I guess, add the recreation ground on top of the school ground but just don't give it a name unless it is really named that (with a sign or on some official document). All the detail is great, but don't alter the access without putting conditions on them (like access=permissive)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95882458
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 09:08:38+00:00): Hey Elliott.   How are you?

I disagree with you.    Maps are for the communities use to identify places.  The fields are allowed by the county to be used for recreation use for the communities.    Having recreational area tags help the recreational organizations and rest of the community to identify for their community where people can be safely with a visual distinction on the maps to utilize when visiting the area.  This helps parents know yes they can use the fields for recreational purposes too, so that less concerns of trespassing is brought up on bogus reasons.   Newer GPS devices also show a visual distinction between schools and recreation use areas, which would benefit the community with these tags.    I wish the fields could actually have name tags too to help the community be able to search for a field easier for directions to them.   Currently you can't tell on maps which field is which.
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 09:10:13+00:00): Playgrounds and other amenities at these areas should be identified as well with names associated with the school name so people can search them when they want to go to a playground, when the county built one for it to use.
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 09:13:55+00:00): Southeast, it is associated by the local community as being named with the school.because it abuses it.     Having a ton of unnamed fields doesn't help the community.
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 09:16:54+00:00): Abutes
WoodWoseWulf (2020-12-31 09:33:53+00:00): Hiya Gabriel,

This is a really common error on OSM, but the name tag should *only* be used for the actual names of things, rather than descriptions.

For example, if you had a University called "The Albert Einstein Technical Institute." You would add that name to the amenity=university area. 

If there was a sports field at that university, you wouldn't just add the name "The Albert Einstein Technical Institute Sports Field" simply because it is located on that campus, as that would generally be a description. It's a sports field at the university, which should be apparent as the sports field should be mapped inside of the university to start with.

If the sports field was called something else or was specifically signposted, you could add that name. So if there was a sports field at The Albert Einstein Technical Institute called the "Lise Meitner Baseball Park" you could add that name.

The key factor here, as Elliot put it very well, is the access tagging. The access key should help local map users work out what they can and can't actually access without the need for descriptive names.

If you're adding names to try and achieve a description of access or operator in some way, you're essentially just mapping for the renderer which is considered poor practice on OSM.

Links to help:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 09:35:10+00:00): Also when recreational organizations put n permits to use the fields for scheduled recreational practices and games the fields are labeled with the school departments.  Yet maps do not show them as such with their proper names.   Some fields are also identified based on dedication and memorial plaques.
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 09:55:01+00:00): With all due respect some of the rules in mapping doesn't actually help the community.  It just keeps the appearance pretty.   Community would benefit with name tags for athletic fields and playgrounds for navigation purposes.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-12-31 10:30:51+00:00): It seems like you're slightly misunderstanding what OSM actually is.

If someone wanted to produce a map of athletic fields and playgrounds that displays operator and access information in text alongside the name, they could simply make a renderer that takes that information and does just that.

It's just like how you can click the layers tab on the main OSM website and swap between Standard, Cycle, Transport, and so forth, different data is given different priorities in different renderings/applications.

OSM by itself isn't like Google Maps with baked-in navigation and all that. It is more like a database designed to be contributed to and then used by other services rather than a tool designed with "civilian" end-users in mind.
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 10:39:21+00:00): Gps devices use OSM.    How is navigation not important?    Maps are used for navigation.      A large area with multiple fields it is hard to navigate which field if the community can't see name tags on each field in the gps device.     Would it benefit being able to say oh GPS I want to go to field 8 at this school.    Even for schools it is helpful for when they have maintenence deliveries scheduled to be delivered at each different field.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-12-31 11:08:49+00:00): "Gps devices use OSM"

Yes, however, they generally use their own custom renderer, and any GPS  tools query function worth its salt would be able to check features inside another area.

Put it this way - knowing where drinking fountains, wastebaskets and toilets are in a school is also useful, but you're not going to name each one of those "Holabird Elementary Drinking Fountain", "Holabird Elementary Wastebasket" or "Holabird Elementary Toilets"
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 12:58:52+00:00): Did I suggest those in my edits?    No.   I suggested the fields!  They are valid for names and recreation area tags.
ZeLonewolf (2020-12-31 14:32:54+00:00): I'd say the use of landuse=recreation_ground is probably OK.  The "name" tag does not appear to be used correctly.  "name" is not used for descriptions, i.e. "CCBC Pitching Cage", "CCBC Main Score Board", etc.

I note 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions but it looks like our wiki documentation could be improved in this regard.

I would encourage reaching out to the tagging mailing list for a second opinion (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging)
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 15:04:17+00:00): Scoreboard I'm fine with removing.   The pitching and batting cages are often used my recreational sports organizations and community members.    It should have a name similar to other recreational fields that can be searched by the community and maintenance personnel.
ZeLonewolf (2020-12-31 15:27:38+00:00): I'm composing a post to the tagging mailing list so that the broader tagging community can weigh in.  I would encourage you to subscribe to the list so that you can participate in the discussions (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging)
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 15:35:09+00:00): I will.   I am currently in the middle if a big moving situation.    Going from Maryland to Florida.   So this week and next week is pretty tough to partake in.   But I am interested in joining once settled in.
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 15:44:04+00:00): Zelonewolf.    Your running trail program might be helpful for baltimore and dundalk.    We have a massive 560 mile federal trail system for the Star Spangled Banner historical route of Francis Scott Key that isn't mapped yet.    With lots of significant view points and historical locations for the community to enjoy during their time on the route.    If you are interested, we can side bar for more information.
Gabriel0322 (2020-12-31 15:48:41+00:00): We also have other biking and hiking routes not mapped for the whole state as well.    Most of with are designed by the local governments.
ZeLonewolf (2021-01-04 12:39:36+00:00): Hello - the community discussed this issue; the link to the discussion is here:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-December/057723.html

As a result of this discussion, the following documentation was updated on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Please ensure that the name=* tagging used in this area is consistent with the community consensus for naming features.
user_5359 (2020-12-16 20:38:36+00:00): Hello! Why didn't we need a google_place_id, what is the source of this information?
kdorzak (2020-12-16 20:50:51+00:00): Hi.
I need that identifier for my tests. 
google_place_id is reference identifier of that node in google places api: 
https://developers.google.com/places/web-service/place-id
user_5359 (2020-12-16 21:17:48+00:00): Hello!

I definitely see this as critical. Without having read Google's terms of use, I assume that storing such IDs in other databases is not permitted (in large quantities). If you personally want to take the risk, you are welcome to store the OSM ID and Goggle ID data in a private database, but this is certainly not desired in OSM. If you want to be sure (or prove me wrong), I recommend contacting the Data Working Group (data@osmfoundation.org).
kdorzak (2020-12-17 08:22:27+00:00): Hi.
It is definitely not critical unless it violates some internal OSM rule. I did read Google terms of use and while you cannot store or cache any data the "place-id" is excluded from those restrictions. 
Quote from link i provided in previous comment:
"Place IDs are exempt from the caching restrictions stated in Section 3.2.3(a) of the Google Maps Platform Terms of Service. You can therefore store place ID values for later use."
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:30:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95882970
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:28:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors. Just don't forget to square all rectangular buildings
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95883158
opendcc (2020-12-15 19:04:00+00:00): Hallo,

bist Du Dir da mit Habichtring sicher? Diese Adresse habe ich schon mal an dem kleinen Haus rechts bei der Einfahrt von der Falkenstraße erfasst ... 

Servus Wolfgang
TD8WbsJi (2020-12-15 19:47:37+00:00): Servus Wolfgang,

Danke für den Hinweis, du hast Recht, Habichtring kann nicht richtig sein. Fasanstraße aber auch nicht, die Adresse existiert ebenfalls schon. Ich tippe richtig wäre Falkenstraße.
Ich werde die nächsten Tage mal hin schauen.

Grüße Martin
opendcc (2020-12-15 19:58:15+00:00): Hallo,

vermutlich ist Fakenstraße korrekt, der Zugang kommt ja auch von Norden her. Gilt dann auch für 2a und 2b, die sind dann noch von mir falsch.
AndersAndersson (2020-12-15 20:18:20+00:00): There is a bridge at this place, not a culvert.
A road crossing a stream is undetermined. Please don't add if you dont know. Undetermined is better than wrong.
johantiden (2020-12-16 09:15:14+00:00): Fixed in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95929512
johantiden (2020-12-16 11:25:02+00:00): And
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95937801
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:27:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. Just do not forget to square all rectangular buildings
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95883240
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:24:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Your mappings are rather precise. Please square each building with the Q key
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95883458
ZeLonewolf (2020-12-15 22:18:26+00:00): Thank you for this fix.  I'm surprised JOSM doesn't flag that as a warning.
Jakka (2021-01-08 21:20:08+00:00):  moet er dan niet hazmat met ent letter gebruikt worden ipv explosives
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hazmat
Thibault Rommel (2021-01-08 21:36:19+00:00): Volgens mij staan er daar borden C24b, heb de tag gebruikt die hier staat https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium/C_Prohibitory_signs#C24b
Jakka (2021-01-08 21:54:47+00:00): OK mogelijk in be geen letter gebruik. thx
Thibault Rommel (2021-01-08 22:03:52+00:00): Kheb recent wel van de plaatsen waar er gewoon een hazmat tag stond in België waar mogelijk de lettercode aangevuld
eggie (2020-12-15 15:28:35+00:00): Top!
Nog wel even één prullenbak losmaken van de landuse
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95884113

gr eggie
Koen Zomers (2020-12-15 15:39:01+00:00): Zo goed?
Koen Zomers (2020-12-15 15:39:30+00:00): Of heb ik er nu weer een nieuwe changeset van gemaakt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95885522#map=19/52.30178/6.93709
slowtux (2020-12-19 20:49:33+00:00): Hallo,
kann sein das Du möglicherweise unbeabsichtigt ein(ige?) Grenz-Relationen verschoben hast?
Z.B passt Plz 22587

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2782357#map=14/53.5650/9.8011

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265706095

nicht mehr.


mfg
Gregor
sefranek (2020-12-21 15:02:45+00:00): Hallo,

wenn dann unabsichtlich. Ich habe vorhandende Wege im Golfplatz verbessert, evtl. ist dabei etwas mit einer Verknüpfung verschoben worden?
Gruß
Ivo