piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-12-31 16:20:38+00:00): Onnodige accesstags verwijderd van Noorderweg.
eggie (2021-12-31 16:24:48+00:00): Adres Roggebotweg 25 hersteld. 
Alle adressen zijn import vanuit het Kadster. Svp niet gaan gebruiken voor een slagboom.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-31 16:28:41+00:00): Het Veerpad in Zwolle is toch gewoon openbare weg?
Het is wel doodlopend, maar niet verboden voor onbevoegden?
eggie (2021-12-31 16:36:30+00:00): De dubbele vermelding Camping Roggebotweg verwijderd. De camping staat al op het vlak. 
Dat geeft dan een foutmelding en dan zal een medemapper het toch verwijderen.
De track heb ik wel de straatnaam gegeven. Het moet dan vindbaar zijn.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-31 16:39:08+00:00): NTKC De Hertenweide  dubbele vermelding verwijderd. De camping staat al op het vlak. Maak steeds een keuze.
eggie (2022-01-01 13:27:34+00:00): NTKC Valkenbelt verwijderd. Was al getagd op het vlak.
MVG
eggie
Herman Lee (2022-05-03 14:36:13+00:00): Can you explain the circles and the straight line in your changesets?
Greg_Rose (2022-01-01 00:10:45+00:00): So you're just going to delete the trail names with no discussion, not even 24 hours after I edited? Not cool - at all.
I'm taking the names from DEEP - these are the names of the trails according to THE authoritative source. What is YOUR source for the changes you made?
Greg_Rose (2022-01-01 00:19:10+00:00): I take it back - the names are coming from the CFPA (www.ctwoodlands.org). Do you not consider them authoritative?
Mashin (2022-01-01 16:43:35+00:00): "The Green Trail" etc. are definitely not official names.

Also would you mind including source of you data to your changesets? You are adding peaks with elevation and names,  deleting existing hiking relations, adding stream names... which clearly couldn't come from Strava layer.
Greg_Rose (2022-01-01 20:52:51+00:00): So much to deal with here....  
  
a) You seem to know that those "are definitely not official names", yet fail to name your source for that knowledge. In this same change you deleted the name of the Pond Mountain NA "Entry Trail", despite it clearly being the official name (www.pondmountaintrust.org > Trail Map tab). So I'm quite skeptical that you actually know what the trail names are - and I suspect that you just are guessing. 
Please keep in mind that the name field is for "Common or Official usage" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name), which means if there is no official name, then the common name is acceptable. Just because the common name matches the trail blazing doesn't mean that it is invalid!  
  
b) There is not enough room in the "source" field to name all my sources in every change. I do have sources for everything though - what specifically do you have questions about? I will ALWAYS respond to queries about my sources.
  
c) >You are adding peaks with elevation and names, deleting existing hiking relations, adding stream names...
- Elevation points are coming from many different sources, as GNIS data is notoriously bad, both in location of the elevation point, and actual elevation. I will often center the point using OpenTopoMap (much more accurate than old topos), and use common naming from Peakbagger or ListsofJohn, if the GNIS does not record the point.
- If I find hiking relations created with only one member, I am either deleting or combining them into a larger relation. A 1-member relation goes against the most basic OSM guidelines - it's pointless and a waste of your time and effort to make short unnamed trails into unnamed 1-member relations.
- Stream names are usually coming from the newer NHD dataset that can be found in many different places. The old NHD dataset currently used in many places on OSM is riddled with inaccuracies. Bull Mountain Brook near Kent is a good example.

Remember we are on the SAME TEAM: We both want the same thing - an accurate and usable dataset!
I honestly think we can work this out and come to an agreement - we are both obviously passionate about mapping, and that's exactly what OSM needs!

Greg
Mashin (2022-01-04 17:47:57+00:00): I hiked those trails many times. There are no such names posted anywhere, no one knows or uses those names. You are just adding stuff from various online sources without knowing anything about the local situation.

Look, I spent weeks cleaning trails in CT and building hiking relations which is a VALID way of mapping that is preferred around the OSM. You are right now directly undoing all my work even though I asked you not to it.

In addition please do not delete hiking relations. They are valid data about where to hike and it doesn't matter if there is one or multiple members in the relation.
Herman Lee (2022-01-01 12:06:53+00:00): 您好，请不要随意删改封浜的站点关系，谢谢
Herman Lee (2022-01-01 15:34:16+00:00): 您好，请不要随意删改14号线的站点关系，谢谢
Herman Lee (2022-01-01 15:34:31+00:00): 您好， 希望您看到评论以后能够尽快回复评论，谢谢
user_5359 (2022-01-01 08:46:28+00:00): Hello! You add on different bus stops the new tags
stop_lat=50.725815
stop_lon=-3.526015
It is not necessary to record coordinates separately, as this is already information of the node.
gpserror (2022-01-01 08:03:35+00:00): Hey, I was wondering about the turn restriction here.  First off I'm not local and don't know all Canadian traffic laws.  However trying to interpret the signs around this intersection I see that Valhalla Inn Road actually seems to have TRs prohibiting entry from the east from The East Mall.  This kind of makes sense because VIR appears to be mainly an off ramp from Hwy427 Collector.  The turnaround there means anyone going west on VIR is forced to turn around so going west is pointless.
Thus my interpretation: the TR placed at the intersection seems it needs to be rotated CCW 90 degrees so that people coming from the condos do not try to go to the pointless turn around if they try to head west.  Same with people leaving from 1 Valhalla trying to take a left and likewise going west.
If you're local and understand this otherwise let me know, but this looks a bit weird.
lapushkin (2021-12-31 16:37:26+00:00): Забыл поставить галку с просьбой проверить изменения более опытных участников ;(
lucumon (2022-05-29 15:28:47+00:00): Boas moncho, escriboche pq para min, no é apropiado crear unha nova via para cada carril dunha mesma estrada, ainda q sexa unha intersección. Realmente, non existe unha via en cada sentido mais outra central, senón que son 3 carrís dunha mesma vía, para isto existe a etiquetaxe dos carrís mediante "lanes", xa que se non crease unha duplicidade de elementos. Falando máis tecnicamente, penso q debería crearse únicamente unha via por "plataforma" como lle chama a DGT á parte asfaltada da vía sen separación por elementos físicos.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115616570
Monchinho (2022-05-29 21:15:49+00:00): Paréceme atinada a túa reflexión . Avante con esa corrección . Graciñas.
VA00 (2022-01-16 07:05:08+00:00): Czemu private?
stary kalosz (2022-01-16 11:52:58+00:00): ale ktora bo nie wiem o co ci chodzi... 1017189870? 176066837? to juz przy bramie 3023368415 jest zakaz wstepu teren prywatny
VA00 (2022-01-16 12:00:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341741224
Bi Bim Bap (2022-01-16 13:34:55+00:00): no to pisze ze juz od bramy od polnocy jest prywatna bo stoi teren prywatny wstep wzbroniony, juz bardziej private nie bedzie
stary kalosz (2022-01-16 13:38:23+00:00): ech nie z tego konta co trzeba
bikingaround244 (2022-01-03 05:25:56+00:00): try to make your change sets more "local" please this spans from Indiana to Massachusetts.
bikingaround244 (2022-01-03 05:28:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9382274418

out of curiosity why this fire hydrant out of all fire hydrants in Boston?
svance92 (2022-01-03 14:42:51+00:00): That's my bad. I was uploading on GoMap and had forgotten the two elements in Indy weren't uploaded. 
And that particular fire hydrant was because it was the one on the street next to the brunch place I was waiting to get into :)
bikingaround244 (2022-01-03 15:22:30+00:00): Makes sence, I have done the same thing! cheers :)
user_5359 (2022-01-01 08:26:19+00:00): Hello! You add on different ways the new keys maxspeed:hgv:conditional:forward and maxspeed:hgv:conditional:backward. 

Normally the conditional is at the end of the word sequence.

See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=maxspeed%3Ahg
Yunkers (2022-01-01 13:54:36+00:00): Hey, I always forget the correct order of tags. Let me correct this :)
mueschel (2022-01-03 13:37:23+00:00): Hi,
there are 8 bus stops with "stop_*" keys which look like a mistake - could you check that?

E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/476660315
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eJF
sec147 (2022-01-04 18:20:23+00:00): Yes, those tags should have been renamed/deleted. Fixed now. Thanks
skyper (2022-01-01 14:22:49+00:00): Hallo garils
Willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe ein paar Hinweise und eine Frage:
1. Bitte verwende in BaWü immer mehrere Hintergründe. Für Gebäude ist Maps4BW empfehlenswert. Für Freiburg habe ich das im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Freiburg_im_Breisgau#Luftbilder_.2F_Hintergrund) zusammengefasst.
2. Das zu schnelle Löschen von Objekten kann dazu führen, dass die Objekte fälschlicherweise von veralteten Quellen erneut eingetragen werden. Daher ist es besser Lebenszykluspräfixe zu verwenden. Insbesondere bei Gebäuden die noch in Maps4BW enthalten sind. `demolished:building=*`, `removed:building=*` oder `razed:building=*` wären hier passender.
3. Bitte gebe Quellen an. Woher hast Du die Informationen? Warst Du vor Ort? Auf den Luftbildern kann ich nicht erkennen ob da ein Gebäude steht oder nicht.

Grüße skyper
garils (2022-01-01 14:39:44+00:00): Hallo skyper,
ich war vor Ort mit StreetComplete und sollte die Gebäudeart auswählen. Ich konnte allerdings kein Gebäude finden noch Spuren von einen Gebäude.

Grüße garlis
skyper (2022-01-02 12:38:59+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.
In so einem Fall ist dann "survey" oder auch "Erkundungen vor Ort" eine passende Quellenangabe.

Habe mittlerweile, das Gebäude aus seinem Grab geholt und mit `removed:building=yes` eingetragen.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Grüße skyper
literan (2022-01-01 17:37:07+00:00): это не парк. park в понятиях OSM - рекреационное учреждение.
rasterfahndung (2024-10-24 17:21:56+00:00): Ist der AED öffentlich zugänglich? Dann bitte access=yes taggen. Danke
Sandal man (2022-02-17 13:31:35+00:00): Hi, you forgot the tags here.
jonashoffmann (2022-02-17 21:53:14+00:00): Oh, true. Thanks for noticing. It should be fixed now.
philippec (2021-12-31 18:50:45+00:00): Deerlijk
NorthCrab (2022-12-31 03:45:17+00:00): Część twoich zmian znowu została "przywrócona" z biegiem czasu :x. Realizuje teraz ten fix na obszarze całego Radomia aby położyć temu kres raz na zawsze :P
cytryn (2023-01-01 13:45:38+00:00): Dzięki za inicjatywę. Z Nowym Rokiem życzę zatem wytrwałości i powodzenia w doprowadzeniu zadania do końca :)
Greg_Rose (2022-02-04 23:27:25+00:00): Pls note that the user that marked this changeset as "bad" has provided no change-specific feedback to me personally or within OSMCha.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115619839
user_5359 (2022-01-01 09:18:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice your typo: The correct key is highway instead hihgway. I have already corrected it
vulasala (2022-01-03 10:49:41+00:00): Hi Hasan_gmc,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification from pedestrian to residential where the path is clear and wide.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115620409
vulasala (2022-01-03 10:50:06+00:00): Hi Hasan_gmc,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification from pedestrian to residential where the path is clear and wide.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115620565
clay_c (2022-03-05 20:01:59+00:00): Hi Joseph,

Did you mean to tag the bus-only roadways as guided busways here? I don't think there are any guided busways at all in the United States (other than the Loop, which is kind of an edge case). And RTC Southern Nevada certainly does not have any guided buses in its fleet.
Joseph R P (2022-03-05 20:31:50+00:00): That was my mistake, I confused busway with bus guideway. Are there no separate ways for bus-only roads?
clay_c (2022-03-05 20:47:46+00:00): Bus-only roadways can be tagged with highway=busway if they represent an important corridor for bus passengers, or just highway=service, access=no, bus=designated for roadways inside garages and stations. Currently, highway=busway is not recognized by any renderers, but it is an approved proposal and ideally will be rendered similar to highway=bus_guideway in the future. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway
Joseph R P (2022-03-05 21:07:48+00:00): Ah, ok. I'm going to work on fixing these. Since highway=busway will soon be recognized, do you think I should I change it to that or make them service roads with access=no for now?
Joseph R P (2022-03-05 21:10:06+00:00): (bus=designated too if the latter option)
clay_c (2022-03-05 21:14:33+00:00): I think the center-running segment along Casino Center Blvd and 3rd St should be highway=busway, and the rest should be highway=service etc.
Joseph R P (2022-03-05 21:29:57+00:00): Alright, looks like I've fixed everything now.
mvestola (2022-01-01 18:56:37+00:00): Mikä mahtaa olla tämä Honkasuon Maurilankuja ja miksi lisätty? Kävin paikan päällä, ei ole olemassa kyseistä tietä. Eikä myöskään ole missään Honkasuon suunnitelmissa myöskään tietääkseni. Poistan tuon tien ja talot, koska ei ole olemassa.
MxxCon (2021-12-31 21:28:34+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete Coney Island area?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115621262
brandonbds (2021-12-31 21:40:37+00:00): Hi there. Is it distinguishable from the existing and remaining quarter named Coney Island? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752911539

The deleted way was labeled a theme park, but there does not seem to a theme park named Coney Island in that geographic area.
MxxCon (2021-12-31 21:45:17+00:00): One is a neighborhood and the other IS an entertainment. There sure is a park here. Just look at https://lunaparknyc.com/ and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coney_Island#Amusement_parks_and_attractions
MxxCon (2021-12-31 21:53:03+00:00): You also for some reason moved a number of intersections along Stillwell Ave? That doesn't match what it is on the ground.
brandonbds (2021-12-31 22:08:52+00:00): Indeed. The theme parks that are there are mapped, no? Luna Park is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13621663. Deno's is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230060366.

There isn't a distinct theme park called Coney Island, is there?

You are correct about the intersections. I mistakenly moved a segment of Stillwell Avenue. I've corrected it an another changeset.
MxxCon (2021-12-31 22:21:17+00:00): Luna Park and Deno's are specific sections. But the whole area collectively is called Coney Island.
brandonbds (2021-12-31 22:31:09+00:00): Could you be more specific? The two theme parks seem to have separate websites, separate addresses, separate telephone numbers. What are they sections of?
MxxCon (2021-12-31 22:39:22+00:00): Coney Island Cyclone Roller coaster is in Coney Island amusement park, but not part of Luna Park nor Deno's.
Coney Island Art Walls exhibit, minigolf course, Coney Island freak show, B&B Carousel, Parachute Jump, Thunderbolt Roller coaster. None of them are part of Luna Park or Deno's, but they are part of Coney Island amusement park.
To some degree some could consider Brooklyn Cyclones stadium and Ford Amphitheater to be part of this area too.
brandonbds (2021-12-31 22:49:15+00:00): When you say Coney Island amusement park, is this a single business?
MxxCon (2021-12-31 22:52:11+00:00): No, afaik it's not a single biz, but this is what's this area is referred to.
brandonbds (2021-12-31 23:58:16+00:00): Okay, so it's a neighborhood, then? It probably shouldn't be tagged a theme park if it's not a distinct concern, no?
MxxCon (2022-01-01 00:18:35+00:00): No. Neighborhood "Coney Island" is the whole area east of Seagate and west of Brighton Beach.
This is an amusement park consisting of many different organizations. It's also referred to as "Coney Island".
brandonbds (2022-01-01 03:02:34+00:00): Does it have a website? Or a telephone number?
brandonbds (2022-01-01 03:03:30+00:00): Or is there a source you can provide that explains what its geographical boundaries are?
MxxCon (2022-01-01 03:12:41+00:00): Afaik there's no website for the aggregate of Coney Island attractions.
I don't understand your hesitation here. Do you not believe that this attractions area is called Coney Island and is separate from the neighborhood of the same name?
MxxCon (2022-01-01 03:17:44+00:00): It's geographical boundaries are all the areas covered by the attractions. You obviously wouldn't add residential buildings to it or Coney Island Train Yard for example...
brandonbds (2022-01-01 03:27:42+00:00): I hope I'm getting closer to understanding. Let me summarize what I've got. There is a thing—it's not a stand-alone theme park itself, and it's not a neighborhood; it's rather a collective name for all of the amusement related businesses in Coney Island. It happens to be called Coney Island, which is the same name as the neighborhood. It has no corporate existence, no website, no telephone number. So far, so good?

It doesn't have closed geographic boundaries; this isn't something you walk into or out of.

So maybe it's a site relation? We take all of these businesses and put them in a site relation called Coney Island.

But do you have a reliable source that refers to this entity? The Wikipedia article says, "Coney Island has two amusement parks, Luna Park and Deno's Wonder Wheel Amusement Park, as well as several rides that are not incorporated into either amusement park. These are owned and managed by several different companies and operate independently of each other." That seems to suggest the opposite, that there is nothing unifying these businesses collectively, that this is just a neighborhood that has a lot of amusement venues.
brandonbds (2022-01-01 03:30:30+00:00): Or maybe this is a land use? Like "landuse=commercial" called Coney Island?
brandonbds (2022-01-01 03:31:27+00:00): Is there something in the zoning map that defines the area?
MxxCon (2022-01-01 03:51:29+00:00): I have no idea about legal zoning map. I'd guess different blocks there are zoned differently to allow for shops, restaurants, amusement rides. I don't know specifics of the law.

When you tell somebody "let's go watch coney island friday night fireworks" everybody knows you are not telling them to go to west 28th st and mermaid ave.
When you tell somebody "let's go attend coney island's july 4th hotdog eating content" everybody knows exactly what it is, and not confuse it with Coney Island Avenue.
Coney Island Mermaid Parade is named that because it takes place in that area, and not Neptune Ave and West 16th St.

Coney Island amusement park is in Coney Island neighborhood. 
No, it's not a gated and fenced off area for which you have to buy tickets and stand in line like 6flags or disney. It is open to everybody who wants to visit. There is no requirement that an "amusement park" has to be an incorporated organization with fences and tickets and telephone numbers or websites.

Just like farmers markets. It's many independent businesses not necessarily associated with each other. There's no fence or gate or ticket. But they operate in the same general area and collectively referred to as such and such farmers market.
brandonbds (2022-01-01 04:00:52+00:00): The way you describe it, it sounds similar to the Diamond District.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702492597

The Diamond District is mapped as an area, commercial land use, a neighborhood, and a tourist attraction. But not as a shopping center, which would imply a more distinct entity than it actually is.

Is that an accurate comparison?
MxxCon (2022-01-01 04:11:21+00:00): I'd consider Diamond District more of a traditional "neighborhood" definition like soho, noho, etc, than this amusement park.
brandonbds (2022-01-01 04:20:31+00:00): Can you say more about that?
ToniE (2022-01-01 17:10:20+00:00): Servus,

endlich hat sich mal einer die Zeit genommen, getraut dort aufzuräumen.

marcoSt hat die Busrelationen schon angepasst.

Ich werde mit die lanes:*, und so, ... auf der Rosenheimer Straße stadteinwärts und Orleanstraße Richtung Ostbahnhof vornehmen

Gruß,
Toni
map per (2022-01-06 14:33:23+00:00): Danke, die lanes* hab ich da ganz vergessen
StephaneP (2023-10-06 10:06:18+00:00): Hello !

Dans ce groupe de changement, tu as transformé plusieurs lignes d'arbres (natural=tree_row) en haies (barrier=hedge).
Exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573864590/history
Ces 2 tags sont très différents. Pour le premier on peut tout à fait passer à travers (entre les arbres) et pour l'autre, c'est vraiment une barrière physique qui n'est pas franchissable. Le souci, c'est que lorsqu'il y a des arbres, c'est quasi impossible de savoir quel tag est le plus adapté seulement en regardant l'imagerie aérienne. Dans l'exemple précédent, il y a clairement des endroits où on peut passer (traces de passages de tracteur). Il faut soit découper à ces endroits, soit laisser en natural=tree_row si on ne peut pas aller vérifier sur le terrain.

A bientôt
Stéphane
TheConductor (2022-01-02 19:42:03+00:00): Hello,

I appreciate your thoughts but I will be reverting your changes. The roads that you have re-tagged do not classify as tertiary roads. They are uniquely residential roads contrary to what cartographic connectivity might show.

I may not have unique authority to speak to road classifications in other locality's but this is home base for me and I have spent years refining the road classifications in this area in consultation with the local government and state highway folks and we are very confident in our classification or arterials, minor arterials, collectors, and local collectors. 

I will also point that East Winnemucca Blvd does not even begin to approach traffic volumes to be classified as primary. We will be keeping that as secondary regardless of what cartographic best fit connectivity may show. Like I said, we are very confident in our classification schema.
Joseph R P (2022-01-03 01:05:19+00:00): Traffic volume doesn't play much of a role in highway classification. If road tags were based on traffic volume, most city streets would be trunk and US 50 and US 6 would be tertiary.

Since trunk has changed its definition from expressway to long-haul route, that means that most secondary roads that are regionally or locally important can be bumped up to primary. In this case, NV 289 from US 95 to I 80 acts as the primary access to Winnemucca for travelers heading west on I 80 as well as the eastern half of the main city street. See how the roads in other similarly-sized Nevada cities like Elko and Mesquite have been upgraded.

As for the other residential road upgrades; tertiary is primarily for through roads and minor arterials and roads that connect locally-important destinations like commercial zones and institutions and schools.

Roads should be classified on an importance basis, and this is what's being worked on throughout the entire US. I've been focusing on the states I've lived in like NV and VA and btwhite92 has done some similar work around Reno with secondary roads. 

Consider re-upgrading these, as tagging roads on how much traffic uses it isn't vital enough for people who need to use OSM data for navigation.