piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2018-02-20 16:33:39+00:00): man_made = pier getagd op name =steiger (verwijderd)  Bij een bankje zet je ook niet name=bankje
eggie (2018-02-20 16:34:44+00:00): Het was verder keurig gemapt. De brug zat niet aan de oever geplakt. Je hebt de vorm van het water aangepast.. vandaar,
Jakka (2018-02-20 19:30:19+00:00): is dit een test dan best terug verwijderen.....
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-07-13 09:27:28+00:00): Czy masz ochotę na zweryfikowanie przebiegu highway=proposed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424138208/history (i innych w ciągu tej drogi)?
literan (2018-02-21 10:31:38+00:00): этой и ссоедними правками вы удалили пешеходные дорожки, испортили (лишили членов) мультиполигон проезжей части Звенигородского шоссе https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=56523894 , улицы Красная Пресня, жилого квартала к северу от последней (поудаляв бордюры). Очень некрасиво - вносить вредительские правки в волнтерский общественный проект. Вандальные правки будут откачены, в случае продолжения вас будет ждать блокировка.
User Rebo (2018-02-25 08:37:44+00:00): Thank you for contribution to the amazing work of S3DB. The [community](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/marc_marc) decided to not use the tag 'roof:slope:direction' any more. Please use 'roof:direction' instead. If you have any doubts, we're happy to discuss them in [forum](https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31481).
JandaM (2018-02-25 14:42:37+00:00): Thank you for information. Next time I will use 'roof:direction' And I will replace deprecated key with new one during my edits. My application already uses 'roof:direction' and  'roof:slope:direction' as fallback.
User Rebo (2018-02-25 16:00:48+00:00): Very nice, thank you :D
BCNorwich (2018-02-20 18:59:13+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed this building as it was a duplication.
Regards Bernard
user_5359 (2018-02-20 17:18:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or demo database. I have reverted this.
BCNorwich (2018-02-20 18:28:36+00:00): Hi, you inadvertently duplicated a building. No problem I've removed it, just wanted to let you be aware.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2018-02-20 18:30:41+00:00): Hi, your play area was in a car park and not tagged as per OSM best practice. No problem I've removed it, just wanted to let you be aware.
Regards Bernard
viloan (2018-02-20 15:42:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Владимир К (2018-02-21 10:44:31+00:00): Нет никаких критериев достаточности полигона вместо мультиполигона. Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с правилами проекта прежде чем делать такие правки.
Constable (2018-02-21 09:57:20+00:00): hi there, welcome to osm
Are you sure all those churches are really located here?
Constable (2018-02-21 10:20:25+00:00): ciao, benvenuto su OSM!
Guarda però che la chiesa era già mappata, ora ne risultano due sovrapposte. Per favore rimuovi quella che hai aggiunto
Grazie
Constable (2018-02-25 18:05:21+00:00): nessuna risposta
BCNorwich (2018-02-20 18:38:36+00:00): Hi, I've retagged the POI as natural=tree, (as per OSM practice). Also removed the area.
Regards Bernard
May I respectfully suggest you read up a bit in order to give the best of your ability to the OSM project.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-11-06 00:40:59+00:00): O usuario 3D Mapas está deletando vias que você criou: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64151504
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-11-06 00:41:15+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64150948
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-11-06 01:20:02+00:00): reverti estas edições.
c2r (2018-07-23 00:13:46+00:00): Looks like this user has been plagerising AA Maps here.
Greyseal18 (2018-07-23 07:16:04+00:00): I email the AA and they said that was correct from Highways England so I can’t argue with them really after saying that
SomeoneElse (2018-07-28 08:52:56+00:00): Just to be clear - you can't use AA maps as a source (even if you've asked them).
If you've asked them to release the data under an OSM-compatible licence and they've done so, then that would be a different story.
GerdP (2018-10-02 06:03:51+00:00): Does anybody know the current status of this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230135072 ?
c2r (2018-10-02 06:24:26+00:00): Unless anyone has free evidence or has seen signs indicating that the length of the road north of Scotch Corner is the A6055,it needs to be reverted, as it could quite easily be a copyright trap by the AA.  South of here I believe it is.
GerdP (2018-11-10 08:56:51+00:00): Seems nobody feels responsible here?
There is a highway=track connected to the motorway:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57745100
There is the typo highway=primary_link;abandoned on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230135072
SomeoneElse (2018-11-17 12:03:16+00:00): If someone thinks that it's wrong, change it back.  I'm not familiar enough with the current state of the A1M works to comment.
Since this changeset was created this user has (I hope) become more familiar with what data is appropriate for OSM and what is not.
SomeoneElse (2018-11-17 12:05:00+00:00): (and for completeness) if someone wants help with any revert, drop a mail to data@osmfoundation.org with full details of what needs to be reverted and why (and "it's wrong" is a plenty good enough reason).
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)
BCNorwich (2018-02-20 18:43:32+00:00): Hi, I removed the name=house as that's not likely the house name. Also removed the building outline from describing the building's shadow as well as the building.
Supaplex030 (2018-02-23 21:41:57+00:00): Hey robson,
großartig dass du Fahrradbügel kartierst - in anderen Teilen Nordneuköllns hab ich das nämlich auch schon systematisch gemacht und mit deinen Edits sind die Lücken im Bezirk inzwischen ganz schön klein geworden. Hatte dir dazu vor ein paar Wochen mal eine OSM-Nachricht geschickt, vielleicht kannst du mal in dein Postfach schauen - freue mich über Antwort :)
BCNorwich (2018-02-20 18:49:47+00:00): Hi, I've removed several instances of the tagging name=house and name=building as these names are not verifiable (fiction). Please read up on OSM best practice.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2018-02-20 18:53:58+00:00): Your contributions to OSM are most welcome but we must all strive to keep the database correct and verifiable thus OSM maps will continue as the best in the world.
Alexander-II (2018-02-21 10:36:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Скажите, какой источник у названия. И почему был удален тег с note?
Josef73 (2018-11-09 19:24:32+00:00): Hello, when closed Poley's Body Shop on Fr or Sa ?
Supaplex (2020-03-05 07:45:34+00:00): 公園的範圍不應與道路相連。
eggie (2018-02-20 17:39:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Je hebt de camping nu 2x getagd. Nu nog een keer op een vlak. Dan is het beter om de node te laten staan en het vlak om te zetten in bv landuse = grass  Dus wat je ziet.
verder svp aangeven wat je edits inhouden. Dus landuse aangepast en camping op vlak gezet.
Pas je het zelf weer aan?
Graag reactie
mennovanderspank (2018-02-20 17:54:47+00:00): Hoi eggie,
Bedankt voor de tip, inderdaad niet slim om een node en vlak tergelijk te gebruiken voor de benaming ik zal het aanpassen

Gr Menno
eggie (2018-02-20 18:24:16+00:00): Oke... mapse  verder
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-21 14:30:35+00:00): Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Mi dispiace, ma hai sbagliato ad inserire il B&B. 1° perché è in mezzo ad una strada
2° perché non hai messo il tag corretto tourism=guest_house
3° il numero di telefono va inserito con il tag corretto. così: phone=+39 340 0869461
Se è un cellulare devi mettere il tag phone:mobile=+39 340 0869461

Se hai bisogno, contattami.
Buon mapping!
danbjoseph (2018-03-08 19:31:54+00:00): The `name` tag is only used for something like "Empire State Building" or "The Pantheon" and not for tagging what the feature is. `building=yes` is enough. You should not put `name=house` or some such.
lakedistrict (2018-02-20 18:36:46+00:00): I'm not sure whether we should map the "mobile" branches which only set up shop for a couple of mornings a week - they have no permanent presence and we don't map ice cream vans or yoga classes etc. If you are adding them the opening hours would be very useful - they're already in the correct syntax on the comparison tool so you can just copy and paste them. :)
lakedistrict (2018-02-20 18:38:50+00:00): Although maybe this one will have some sort of permanent presence - it's open 4 part days each week. http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postoffice/branch/96428
gurglypipe (2018-02-20 23:04:39+00:00): Good point about the opening_hours. I was hesitant to add them, since I wasn’t sure how correct they would be. But after verifying them against some other branches in Kendal, they seem pretty consistent. I’ll add them.

I think it’s useful to have the ‘mobile’ post offices on the map, since they should always be there during their opening hours, right?
gurglypipe (2018-02-20 23:07:29+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56534742 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56534715.
gileri (2018-02-20 21:34:17+00:00): Bonjour,

Il n'y a généralement pas besoin de mettre les information d'adresse sur les établissements dans les grandes villes. Ici par exemple, des noeuds sont présent avec les bonnes informations, permettant de trouver un commerce avec son adresse ou son nom sans problème.

Si une adresse postale de contact est utile, elle peut être ajoutée avec les tags contact:street, contact:housenumber etc.
dest41 (2018-02-20 22:36:31+00:00): Bonjour, je ne savais pas, entendu
Hjart (2018-02-20 18:08:42+00:00): Jeg ruller lige Aastrupvej tilbage. Den er primært en "beboelsesvej"
viloan (2018-02-20 18:01:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-02-20 21:34:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
ovruni (2023-09-13 20:26:50+00:00): Aqui hay retiro de dirección y nodo de interpolaciones sin motivo
viloan (2018-02-20 18:08:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
danbjoseph (2018-03-08 19:30:07+00:00): The `name` tag is only used for something like "Empire State Building" or "The Pantheon" and not for tagging what the feature is. `building=yes` is enough. You should not put `name=house` or some such.
Владимир К (2018-03-16 11:30:20+00:00): Не нужно подписывать объекты в название категориями!
viloan (2018-02-20 18:26:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
wandelloeffel (2018-02-27 14:09:19+00:00): Hausnummer doch besser nicht als einzelne Punkte am Gebäude einzeichnen. Gebäude mit mehreren Hausnummern lassen sich trennen (siehe z.B. Paul-Neumann-Str 87/89)
Christopher (2018-02-27 19:40:50+00:00): An einem der Gebäude war noch die Adresse am ganzen Gebäude dran, habe ich entfernt, so sah es früher aus. In der Gegend wurden getrennte Häuser als auch die Variante der Eingänge verwendet. Da aus meiner Sicht die Adresse am Haupteingang sinnvoller und genauer zum navigieren ist und das Gebäude keine wirklich Trennung zwischen den Teilen/Hausnummern hat habe ich diese Variante gewählt.
ovruni (2023-09-13 20:27:55+00:00): Aqui hay retiro de interpolaciones sin motivo aparente
M!dgard (2018-09-17 21:34:04+00:00): village_green is specifieks: "a distinctive part of a village centre". It's an area of common land (usually grass but may also be a lake), in the centre of a village.

Dat is waarschijnlijk niet waarvoor je het gebruikt. Vroeger wist ik dat ook niet en heb ik dat ook veel gedaan, maar het is dus niet juist. Er is landuse=grass voor gewoon gras, barrier=hedge voor lineaire hagen, landcover=bushes voor struikgewas (niet breed ondersteund, natural=scrub wordt hier ook vaak voor ge-/misbruikt), en voor bomen landcover=trees (idem, en natural=wood en landuse=forest zijn de misbruikte tags) en natural=tree_row.
Tim Couwelier (2018-09-18 06:44:40+00:00): Heb je compleet gelijk in.

Alles is nog in aanleg, de feitelijke aanplant moet veelal nog gebeuren. De vakken tussen de parkings moeten later bomen een plaats geven, de rest van de plantvakken is nog niet helemaal duidelijk wat er komt. Ik hoop het na aanleg evenwel te verfijnen.

Idem voor de parking rond de Expo Hallen btw. En helaas is natural = scrub vaak 'misbruikt' omdat die wel rendert.
Julio_Costa_Zambelli (2018-02-20 19:31:11+00:00): La etiqueta correcta para cabañas de turismo es tourism=chalet, tourism=alpine_hut se refiere a un refugio andino. Hay que revisar si maps.me tiene la categoría correcta, quizás no es así.
eggie (2018-02-20 21:56:09+00:00): Please don't add housenumbers... use the present BAG address-nodes.
eggie (2018-02-20 19:55:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Het is niet gebruikelijk om de adresnodes te verwijderen en de info op de gebouwen zelf te zetten. Daar zijn nu juist die adresnodes voor. Ik kijk even naar deze edits of het is aan te passen. 
Gebouwen hebben in de regel niet de naam van het bedrijf /instelling.
eggie (2018-02-20 20:05:22+00:00): Deze draai ik terug wegens te veel schade. De tags zal ik later aanpassen. Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
eggie (2018-02-20 20:17:05+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #56531275

info naar adresnodes gezet
eggie (2018-02-20 21:09:00+00:00): Contact via PB gehabt. Vielen Dank
dcapillae_old (2018-02-20 19:40:58+00:00): Hola, Parie.

Algunas calles y edificios aparecen ligeramente descolocados. Para el trazado de calles y edificios puedes usar información del Catastro. Las imágenes están disponibles en JOSM como «Catastro de España».

Gracias y feliz mapeo.

Daniel
user_5359 (2018-02-20 21:28:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your way (I assumed highway=service & service=driveway), but unfortunately you miss also the connection to the existing highway.
Please also noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. I have moved this node information.
eggie (2018-02-20 19:59:08+00:00): Er loopt hier een wonderlijke way zonder tags die geplakt zit aan de landuse. ik kijk er even naar. 
Probeer je eerst in te lezen .. zie welkomstmail
eggie (2018-02-20 20:03:15+00:00): Ik zal deze changeset moeten terugdraaien, want hier is veel schade aangericht. Je hebt een weg op een fietsroute geplakt. Wat was je bedoeling hier?  Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-02-20 20:17:39+00:00): reverted by changeset #56531344
literan (2018-02-21 10:23:05+00:00): а зачем линию с тегами was:building=yes сносить? Чтобы пришел новичок и заново здание по бингу нарисовал (как я уже десятки раз откатывал)? Откачу. Парковку удалю.
carciofo (2018-02-27 14:44:39+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM. Please be careful when panning the map, as sometimes nodes can be accidentally displaced and snapped to other roads, as was the case here with Griffin  Road. I've fixed the error. Thanks & happy mapping!
ovruni (2023-09-13 20:32:51+00:00): Aquí hay múltiples eliminaciones de interpolaciones sin motivo
user_5359 (2018-02-20 21:23:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
cgthigpen (2018-02-21 16:24:59+00:00): Thanks for checking my edits. This actually is the building - the full property would also include the guest parking around the west and north sides of the building. The building has a ground-level parking garage, leasing office, and two commercial spaces, and the apartment complex is built up on the 2nd through the 5th floors.
user_5359 (2018-02-24 17:16:19+00:00): Unfortunately, the aerial photograph does not always show where the ground and the building meet. I have drawn some details in more detail, maybe the inner courtyards have to be drawn in.
cgthigpen (2018-03-01 22:53:32+00:00): Understood. I made a few remaining changes based on my local knowledge of the building. Thanks for your edits.
Dr Kludge (2018-03-03 18:58:20+00:00): @cgthigpen those are some great first edits. I have been down that way to survey and map.  It is a crazy place to keep updated with all the new building construction. Keep up the good work.  We need some more editors in the Tempe area.  You are using the iD editor.  It may be hard to add the empty areas to the buildings.   @user_5359 should have taken this into account.  The name and address are also appreciated.  Thanks.  Greg
cgthigpen (2018-03-03 19:49:27+00:00): Thanks. Would you recommend the Potlatch 2 editor instead? 

This is unrelated to this changeset, but I also edited the Tempe administrative boundary by linking together existing boundary ways/lines that were, for some reason, broken into a series of separate ways/lines. Do you know why the administrative boundary wasn't one continuous way? And for some reason, after I made those edits, the Tempe admin boundary still doesn't show up when I search for it. Instead, I get a node. Any ideas why that is? In neighboring cities, if I search for the city in OSM, the admin boundary is usually the first returned result.
Dr Kludge (2018-03-03 23:25:24+00:00): The editor is a mater of choice.  The way that OSM works is nodes have an x,y coordinate.  Nodes are strung together to make a way.  Then both nodes and ways can be used in a relation. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Elements
Here is an example building https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/131564 that used a relation to create the holes in the foot print.  Using a relation to incoportate other empty hoels is what you would have to do to make Skywater look more like the aerial image.  I am perfectly fine with what you did because you are just learning.
<br />
Relations are also used in boundaries.  I believe that is where you are struggling with the admin boundary change.  There could be other tagging issues as to why your change did not show up in search. You might want to gain experience editing/adding nodes and ways before tackling relations.
Dr Kludge (2018-03-03 23:28:51+00:00): PHXGeo, https://www.meetup.com/PHXGeo/, has OSM editing meetups every once in awhile.  You might want to watch for these meetups when they occur.