piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DemoLogin (2019-08-14 21:04:18+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо за ваш вклад в проект OpenStreetMap.
Однако, хочу заметить, что для не регулируемых пешеходных переходов используется crossing=uncontrolled вместо crossing=marked
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6683412259/history
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing#.D0.A2.D0.B5.D0.B3_.D0.BF.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B5.D1.85.D0.BE.D0.B4.D0.B0
Пивун (2019-08-31 05:39:03+00:00): Благодарю. Учту в будущих правках.
Jfact0ry (2020-08-27 23:25:32+00:00): Local news article about the name change http://sitkasentinel.com/7/2012-05-10-22-08-10/local-news/14871-searhc-renames-health-care-facilities
eggie (2019-08-05 08:49:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Je mutaties lijken me niet correct.. Niet echt doorlopende straten in wijken worden als highway=residential getagd.
De Eycmanlaan heb je nu veranderd van secondary naar primary. 
Zie hier de tagging van wegen in Nederland. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging
Als onervaren mapper zou ik niet zomaar van alles gaan veranderen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-05 08:51:22+00:00): Je edits zullen worden teruggezet. Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-05 08:54:26+00:00): reverted by changeset #73011732
eggie (2019-08-05 08:56:22+00:00): Je edits zijn teruggezet. Dit wordt gezien als vernieling van de kaart. realiseer je dat elke upload ook daadwerkelijk op de kaart komt.
Lees je svp eerst goed  in voordat je verder veranderingen doorvoert en/of neem even contact op. 
MVG,
Eggie
Irenemeyer61 (2019-08-05 09:05:51+00:00): Sorry het was niet mijn bedoeling iets te vernielen, zal voortaan vandaan blijven.

Mvg
Irene
eggie (2019-08-05 10:01:11+00:00): Dag Irene.. Er wordt je verder niets kwalijk genomen. 
Ergens vandaan blijven hoeft uiteraard niet. Probeer je wel in te lezen. Zie welkomstmail. Ook op het forum kun je vragen kwijt.
De edits van startende mappers worden gevolgd... ook om te helpen. 
MVG,
Eggie
shinjiman (2019-08-17 02:59:34+00:00): This section of Beechboro Road North was removed by the Northlink WA project, and is that really exist anymore?
shinjiman (2019-08-17 03:03:49+00:00): Here's the newsletter regarding to the closure of this section.
https://project.mainroads.wa.gov.au/northlinkwa/Documents/Traffic%20update%20-%20Gnangara%20Road.pdf
Ewen Hill (2019-08-17 03:57:34+00:00): Thanks for the update. I have removed the top end link roads and set this to service / no access and removed the track just to the west and removed the Northlink section Thanks for the heads up.
Ewen Hill (2019-08-17 03:58:37+00:00): I also removed the SH 53 relation
literan (2019-08-05 13:58:44+00:00): не пыжься, покемоны не придут. Мусор вычищен.
user_5359 (2019-08-05 13:21:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel
Diacritic (2022-09-19 23:38:07+00:00): Hi Xuecai,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM.

May I ask how your added this data? Was this imported from another dataset or did you trace the treecover by hand?
Warin61 (2019-08-06 10:25:01+00:00): Hi
Way 710543215 crosses itself. This needs to be corrected. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.08965&lat=-8.88289&zoom=18&opacity=0.75
siwilde (2019-08-06 11:04:17+00:00): Hi Warin61  thanks for the note, the square is now completed and validated by someone else , as such TM won't let access it. Is there another  method for me to correct this myself?
Warin61 (2019-08-06 11:21:35+00:00): Might work ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710543215 ? edit - 2 in browser editors .. I'm a JOSM user so both those editors I am not familiar with.
siwilde (2019-08-06 11:29:29+00:00): Fixed, thanks.
eggie (2019-08-26 21:17:30+00:00): Ha Eric.. Je hebt het hier open gezet. (Intermezzo) Weet je het wel zeker? 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-26 21:48:57+00:00): Het is hier al jaren afgesloten met een bord C1 . Ook om sluipverkeer tegen te gaan.  Het zuidelijk deel wordt gebruikt voor bouwverkeer. .., maar het zal natuurlijk wel kunnen. 
Zal komende week weer eens kijken.
eggie (2019-08-27 09:11:39+00:00): Ha Eric.. Ik heb de boel weer op slot gezet middels access=no / bicycle=no foot=yes en traffic_sign = NL:C1  na survey. 
De bollard heb ik naar het pad verplaatst.
De weg wordt gebruikt voor bouwverkeer.
Denk niet dat hij ooit in z'n geheel nog open gaat, want dan krijg je een berg sluipverkeer bij file op de A15. 

De Oostelijke parallelweg is nu wel afgesloten voor autoverkeer vanaf de nieuwe wijk. 
MVG,
Eggie
sgsg65 (2019-08-05 08:56:23+00:00): plotted wrongly to be deleted
nevw (2019-08-06 08:44:16+00:00): Hi,
I reverted your business addition to the OpenStreetMap for some of the reasons listed on our wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

Adding a name and all other info in a description tag is not suitable, please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
muralito (2019-08-05 14:28:13+00:00): Apparentemente hai inavvertitamente modificato la località Suardi (Argentina)
abakus_uploader (2019-08-05 22:31:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
literan (2019-08-05 13:54:52+00:00): Burger Heroes соответствует определению amenity=cafe в ОСМ-вики. Поэтому я верну корректный тег.
NickLaz (2019-08-05 13:57:08+00:00): Burger Heroes - это бургер-бар, что соответствует amenity=fast-food
literan (2019-08-05 14:21:41+00:00): Нам все равно, как они сами себя называют, хоть бургер-баром, хоть бургер-аэродромом. Для OSM имеют значение только фактические формальные признаки. Читайте вики.
NickLaz (2019-08-06 08:02:25+00:00): "Burger Heroes - это сеть бургер-баров, а не кафе", Валентин Митрофанов, Директор по Маркетингу сети Burger Heroes.
jmapb (2019-08-29 13:10:00+00:00): Hi Zverik -- You've changed a few service roads here to access=destination with the source listed as "Juno provider traces" but I don't see any sign of Juno activity on these roads.

Last I surveyed here all of these were signed as authorized vehicles only -- has this changed? J
Zverik (2019-08-30 11:36:34+00:00): Hi,

Yeah, I might be wrong to do that. The thing is, half of the roads had been already marked with "access=destination". It should be one way or another: mixing the two produces weird routing results. I am okay if you mark closed roads as private.
jmapb (2019-08-30 15:34:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60942164 really is =destination for motor vehicles -- It's not a public road but people can drive to the end of that segment and unload supplies for the picnic areas to the east. (I suppose =yes or =permissive would also work, but =destination feels most correct to me.)

Motor vehicles can't go any further than that -- but people and bicycles can, and this is the primary use of the remainder of the road, though it can be used by vehicles with a permit. (Same with the other service roads around Litchfield Villa)

Then there are the roads within the park forestry complex (44 West Drive), which are completely off limits except to park personnel.

So it really is a mix of different access types. I'm not sure what weird results you were seeing, but here's what I'm seeing now: https://imgur.com/a/bw931DK
The destination is valid, but the route is completely impossible. The correct route would be right on 8th St, right on 8th Ave, right on 3rd St, right on Prospect Park West, and then left into the park.

I'm planning to revert these access changes when I get a moment. J
jmapb (2019-08-30 16:38:37+00:00): I've reverted in changeset 73931493. If there are still routing issues here, please let me know and we'll figure it out! J
Warin61 (2019-09-07 23:21:43+00:00): Relation 9853102 looks to be a simpler duplication of relation 9865313. Relation 9865313 should have more inners .. and some of the inners need to have inners in them.. a real mess you have here.  
I have deleted relation 853102 and one other relation that are simplifications of relation 9865313.

Will you correct the remaining relation 9865313?
PT-53 (2019-08-05 15:48:41+00:00): Hallo WarGeo,
daß diese Feldwege "befestigt" sind, ergibt sich bereits aus tracktype=grade1.
Interessant wäre dann doch, um welchen Belag es sich handelt (Asphalt, Beton oder Betonspuren etc.).
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-06 05:27:30+00:00): Hallo WarGeo, 
Du hast diese Linie 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710903895 
neu eingezeichnet, ohne Merkmale.
Die Linie liegt direkt über diesen Wegen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35551332/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372219945/history
Was soll die neue Linie darstellen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-06 05:42:52+00:00): Diesen Weg hast Du ebenfalls neu eingezeichnet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710903897/history
Der neue Weg liegt direkt über diesem Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40611119/history
PT-53 (2019-08-06 05:44:30+00:00): Hier nochmal das gleiche:
Dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710903896/history
liegt direkt über diesem Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38802252/history
PT-53 (2019-08-06 05:50:16+00:00): Da ist ja einiges schiefgegangen. Ich habe daher den ganzen Änderungssatz vollständig zurückgesetzt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73048570
Was wolltest Du eigentlich ändern?
Fragende Grüße
reigi (2021-05-16 05:18:38+00:00): Ich sehe das so wie du es  im Note geschrieben hast. Sollten wir nicht besser die gesamte Linie löschen? So taucht immer noch die Linie  + description + note in den Daten auf.
tux67 (2021-05-16 07:06:08+00:00): Von mir aus gerne, scheint Jan seitdem keiner vermisst zu haben. ...
reigi (2021-05-16 07:18:47+00:00): erledigt
BCNorwich (2019-08-05 10:17:50+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your amendment results in two identical Chinese names for London, name:zh-Hans=伦敦 and name:zh=伦敦

Formerly it was name:zh-Hans=伦敦 and name:zh=倫敦, the Chinese characters in the simplified form being different.

Does your change need to be reverted?

Regards Bernard.
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-06 05:21:11+00:00): Hi Lucifer Morningstar, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind reverting your own changeset? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73012780

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
nevw (2019-08-06 08:41:01+00:00): Hi,
I reverted your business addition to the OpenStreetMap for some of the reasons listed on our wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

Adding a name and all other info in a description tag is not suitable, please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
Tomas Straupis (2019-08-06 05:04:00+00:00): Reverted incorrect change of waterway=riverbank to natural=water+water=river.
#ban_iD
scai (2020-03-29 07:53:20+00:00): Hallo Christoph,

du hast hier eine Selbsthilfebox als Krankenhaus hinzugefügt. Das ist nicht korrekt, die Selbsthilfebox gab es außerdem daneben schon vorher (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/486539992/history). Ich habe das entsprechend korrigiert.

Grüße
Alex
eggie (2019-08-05 10:27:30+00:00): Tag amphore.. 
danke für dein Beitrag. 
Die Gebäude sind alle Import vom Kadaster. Bitte nicht ändern. 
Ein Carport darf als building=roof seperaat  "getagd" werden. 
Gr Eggie
amphore2000 (2019-08-05 12:02:43+00:00): Ich war in Botterlaan 20 in Urlaub. Rechts am ist ein Anbau -> Berging.

Soll ich die Änderung rückgängig machen?
eggie (2019-08-05 13:04:09+00:00): Nein... Das können Sie ruhig so lassen... nur bei periodieke Import kommen vielleicht zwei Gebäude in OSM.. 😀

Gr.. Eggie
amphore2000 (2019-08-05 13:11:29+00:00): Dann ändere ich das lieber wieder, sonst gibt es confusion.

MfG, Helmut
BCNorwich (2019-08-05 10:32:21+00:00): Hi, no need for a separate POI if the building is tagged with the same data, it's duplication. I slightly amended the areas, removed the POI and reverted the your change to the overall area tags.

Regards Bernard.
nlehuby (2020-05-15 18:24:47+00:00): Bonjour,

attention, ce restaurant a été créé avec un tag "contact:housenumber" vide, ce qui n'est pas conforme.

De plus, son positionnement (au milieu d'un parking) semble étrange et mériterait une vérification.

Cordialement
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2020-05-18 06:41:43+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre message

En effet, nous avons corrigé le tag.
Par ailleurs, le parking n'existe plus et le restaurant a bien été construit à la place de celui ci .

Cordialement,
sheldonelectric (2025-04-10 22:30:32+00:00): Ciao Michele, what is the source for the italian and english names?
Michele Locati (2025-04-11 07:23:49+00:00): When I asked local people about the "Άγιος Ιωάννης" name, they (speaking in English), talked about "St. John".
About the Italian name: I'm Italian, and here "St. John" is called "San Giovanni".
sheldonelectric (2025-04-11 09:13:32+00:00): I search for San Giovanni located in Italia but i see no name:en=St. John...
According to your logic, I could add name:el=Άγιος Ιωάννης and name:es=San Juan?
Michele Locati (2025-04-11 09:43:01+00:00): The item in this map is a small chapel dedicated to Saint John.
The name of Saint John in Italy is "San Giovanni".
I think it's correct if in Spanish it's called "San Juan".
sheldonelectric (2025-04-11 10:04:29+00:00): My question was why there is no english name there https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/720351622 and do you think it would be correct to add a greek french and spanish name on that one.
woodpeck (2019-09-29 10:33:35+00:00): Hello! The "tianditu" (天地图) imagery may not be legally used for OpenStreetMap because it is copyrighted. Pleae do not use it because any edits you make based on this imagery will have to be removed from OSM. -- Frederik Ramm, OSMF Data Working Group.
mike140 (2019-08-09 14:52:14+00:00): После этой правки с карты пропал большой массив леса. При редактировании обращайте внимание в какие отношения входит линия. Такие линии требуют большой осторожности в обращении - в результате был сломан мультиполигон леса.
Palolo (2019-08-05 15:31:39+00:00): Please map the buildings accurately. This area needs more work.
FransWillem (2019-08-05 15:11:23+00:00): Hello Silgarce. Sorry to bother you so often, but your mappings requires that.
Here you did not square your buildings either. but you made faulty taggings by tagging a building not alone as building-yes, but also give it a name=building.
IDeditor did show a warning about that but you ignored it. 
Please pay attention on those warnings
Best regards
FransWillem (2019-08-05 14:59:49+00:00): Hello Silgace.  I reviewed this mapping as well.  Here you could see that there were objects mapped, You are a beginner mapper so I can imagine that you forgot to check the offset, ( See training info iDeditor)
When you should correct the offset, the mapping of another mapper shows a correct mapping. Thus no need to map the building again.  One of the buildings has an oval shape. these can be mapped as rectangular, because the walls will be rectangular.
Take a look here
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fBoWAx8WWc9Yy9NZJTAp_6o_Sy-JsL3H
A few buildings are wrongly mapped. I corrected them
Best regards
gscscnd (2019-08-05 17:41:25+00:00): 1. Jeśli chcesz uzupełnić informacje o planowanych drogach, użyj tagu highway=proposed, a nie highway=primary.
2. Zobacz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1870638.
3. Zobacz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1870640.
4. Ani na Geoportalu, ani na Bingu nie widać dróg, które narysowałeś.
Saeed SJ (2019-08-19 07:59:36+00:00): سلام، وقت بخیر
دوست عزیز در این قسمت در چندین مورد، خط ها duplicate شده و روی هم افتاده بودند که اصلاح کردم.
FransWillem (2019-08-05 14:42:36+00:00): Hello Silgarce. Thanks for mapping on this project. Validators, I am one, review mappings done by (beginner)mappers and check if they comply with the instructions and of good quality. 
I have some remarks on your mappings
You mapped 13 buildings here, None were squared. Always square the buildings with the Q key in iDeditor.
Your mappings are a bit inaccurate. See attached pictures. Left with yellow arrows shows the mappings involved. On the right side your mappings. Please reopen this changeset and make the corrections needed.  Follow the outlines correct and square your mapped buildings
I invalidate this task.
Best regards and keep mapping
FransWillem (2019-08-05 14:49:29+00:00): I forgot to include the link. Here it is
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WxBS3B6m-vLL553nh7jEYTwQEJ7EjlZa
Best regards
trigpoint (2019-08-06 10:35:21+00:00): Hi, this edit and any others in which you have used prohibited sources should be reverted.

We do not permission to use streetview under any circumstances, this should be part of the basic training which Amazon give.

However this changeset confused me, having local knowledge it seemed unlikely, however what I assume you are trying to map is visible in mapillary but this is not a legal restriction. The signs are temporary and look nothing like legal roadsigns. 

This type of sign is an internal instructions to construction traffic and should not be mapped in OSM,

Cheers Phil
ajijohn (2019-08-06 14:45:20+00:00): Hi Phil,
 
Thanks for looking into my edit. I had added this turn restriction based on the mapillary street level imagery. As per my knowledge, mapillary is an authorized source of streel level imagery to perform the edit. Please guide me in case there is something I am missing over here.
 
I have removed the turn restriction as per your suggestion. I was not able to distinguish between a permanent legal and temporary road sign, hence the mistake happened. I have duly noted it and will use it as a learning for my future edits. Let me know in case you have any other suggestions. Always happy to learn from the local community.
 
Regards
Ajijohn
trigpoint (2019-08-06 15:13:38+00:00): Hi, thank you for replying. Use of mapillary is fine. I was concerned that you had used Google streetview based on your changeset comment where you said streetview. Putting that word in a comment will get alarm bells ringing.

Cheers Phil
ajijohn (2019-08-06 15:30:58+00:00): Hi Phil, 

Thank for pointing this out. I would use the correct terminology going forward. Let me know in case you have any other suggestion.

Regards
Ajijohn
freebeer (2019-08-05 16:24:11+00:00): nice changeset.  i'm glad you were able to correct/augment the driveways i was unclear about, due to my chosen imagery at the time, as actual driveways and not business/gummint service drives in this area.

one thing i noticed where i had not corrected your mis-tagged additions, is that it appears esri/maxar aerials are most recent, where i saw a mis-mapped car park that matched bing, but not the newly laid tarmac of the others.

of course the decade-old esri clarity archive is also different, but best for drawing and aligning unchanged features in this area where mapbox fails to deliver the sharp images i expect to find.

good work.
DETHBR (2019-08-05 16:36:56+00:00): Its just a lot easier for me to map with the browser since most of the features are correct as well as since i am in this area a good amount. The rest i can fairly well guesstimate
Luzandro (2019-09-14 15:08:06+00:00): Hallo Gerald,

du hast eine handvoll Adressen bzw. eine Straße von "Seestraße" auf "Seesiedlung Ufer" geändert - lauten die restlichen Adressen / Straßen, die im Moment noch mit "Seestraße" bezeichnet sind, demnach mittlerweile auch auf "Seesiedlung Ufer"?

Die korrekte Bezeichnung für die restlichen Straßen / Adressen in der Gegend, die in OSM auch nicht konsistent sind, ist mir auch nicht ganz klar. Ich bin heute am Rande mit dem Rad dort vorbei gekommen und auf der Übersichtskarte im Nordwesten werden die Straßen nur mit "Straße I - IVX" bezeichnet. Die basemap bzw. die BEV-Daten geben sie als "Seesiedlung I. - IVX. Straße" an, wobei das auch nicht völlig konsistent ist und offenbar ein winziger Teil auf Seiten von Neufeld als "Weekendstraße I" angegeben wird, während der Rest der Straße auf Hornsteiner Seite als "Seesiedlung I. Straße" bezeichnet wird. In OSM werden sie aktuell "Weekendsieldung Straße III" oder "Weekendstraße IVX" genannt. Letzteres ist dort auch auf Schildern zu finden, die allerdings nicht wie übliche, offizielle Straßenschilder aussehen. Kannst du dieses Kuddelmuddel vielleicht ein wenig auflösen?
Sosha1996 (2019-09-09 21:37:48+00:00): تگ place=city برای شهر‌های بالای ۱۰۰هزار جمعیت و یا مراکز استان‌هاست. درغیر این صورت باید تگ place=town بدید.
Steube (2019-08-11 09:40:29+00:00): Die Löschung von bicycle=no ist zwar formell korrekt. Idealerweise sollte an solchen Wegen aber mtb:scale= ergänzt werden, damit Router das auswerten können und nicht "Normalo"-Radfahrer solche Wege nutzen (sollen). Dies war vermutlich die Absicht hinter dem nicht korrekten tag bicycle=no.

Durch die vermehrte Nutzung von e-Bikes sind mittlerweile Radfahrer in bergigen Regionen unterwegs, für die solche Trails eine Herausforderung darstellen, wenn nicht sogar äußerst gefährlich sind.
_torsten_ (2019-08-11 10:39:37+00:00): Ich gebe dir in allem Recht. Zusätzlich zu mtb:scale sollte außerdem noch smoothness an die Wege angetackert werden. Ich bin aber zu selten vor Ort um diese entsprechenden Eigenschaften zu bewerten. Und ein smoothness=impassable oder ein mtb:scale=6 wäre genau so falsch wie bicycle=no.
Vulcanodong (2019-08-05 12:20:47+00:00): 用地整体不应标注为建筑
BCNorwich (2019-08-06 05:59:02+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There are two supports under this bridge, both are mapped, Way: 431275462 and Way: 431275463. Therefore your POI (node) is duplication so I've removed it.

Please don't be put off by this, keep on mapping, need any help just ask.

Regards Bernard.
changchun_1 (2019-08-13 16:02:04+00:00): Hallo Brezel2, 
die Fahrradstraße geht von und bis zur Badstraße. Siehe Bild https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/8JScqUnOJH8a1LoT49_F_w
Habe deine Änderung von motor_vehicle=permit zurück gesetzt.
NetWormKido (2019-10-11 10:35:40+00:00): Прекратите рисовать улицы поверх уже нарисованных. Так делать нельзя, за вами приходится всё это вычищать.
viloan (2019-08-05 12:42:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!