piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2022-04-23 08:17:52+00:00): Hi,
Only one 'landuse=grass in this changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13777531/history  I don't see any other features here... certainly the individual ways have no tags. 


The OSM key 'natural' is not well named! "Used to describes natural physical land features, including ones that have been modified or created by humans." ... so even 'man made' things can use the key 'natural'... See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural

Note my inclusion of landcover=grass. I think this is a more logical tag - say what it means without any extra explanation - at least to english speakers.
sykul (2022-02-09 10:20:00+00:00): What kind of barrier is it?
LBond93 (2022-02-17 12:47:06+00:00): There are some bollards
user_5359 (2022-02-09 11:27:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add religion and denormination (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:religion) to the church.
eggie (2022-02-09 07:41:17+00:00): Mooi.... maar layer =-1 kan er weer af. De weg blijft op maaiveldhoogte.
Gr eggie
ivanbranco (2022-02-10 13:16:45+00:00): Hi,

the correct tag is "place=neighbourhood" not "place=Neighbourhood", could you check it out?

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1fWV
axelr (2022-02-10 02:44:59+00:00): Beachte bitte das wiki-VRS. Als Name des Verkehrsverbundes verwenden wir network=VRS Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VRS#Erforderliche_Tags_f.C3.BCr_Relationen
themartinix (2022-02-10 07:15:53+00:00): Ah, danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte beim mappen in der Umgebung die automatische Aufforderung zur Aktualisierung der VRS-Daten bekommen. Da hatte ich mich eigentlich an die vorgeschlagenen Aktualisierungen gehalten. Habe gerade nochmal einiges ergänzt; müsste jetzt passen ;-)...
ivanbranco (2022-02-12 10:02:00+00:00): Hi Абдулазиз3922,

OSM value are in lowercase by convention, so "place=neighbourhood" instead of "place=Neighbourhood".

Good mapping :)
NorthCrab (2023-01-12 04:27:30+00:00): Proszę nie nadawaj obiektom nazw opisowych https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1029522020 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Dawid2849 (2022-02-09 09:08:15+00:00): Nie ma takiego znaczenia jak inne tertiary w okolicy.
osmviborg (2022-02-09 08:40:22+00:00): loc_name=Sankt Croix ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Variants
b-holdet (2022-02-11 05:12:53+00:00): Rettet til loc_name
Lader ikke til at brugeren reagerer.
osmviborg (2022-02-12 06:44:09+00:00): Tak. Tagget burde være mere udbredt, synes jeg.
DaveF (2022-02-10 16:58:12+00:00): Hi 
Welcome to OSM.
To check, what was the source for the ref data?
tom davison (2022-02-10 17:01:17+00:00): Hi, sorry should have added it: http://www.railwaycodes.org.uk/crs/crss.shtm
DaveF (2022-02-10 20:58:34+00:00): No worries. The reason I asked was wiki has it wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:South%20Hylton%20Metro%20station?uselang=en

One thing - Initialisations should be capitalized.
ivanbranco (2022-02-11 21:48:41+00:00): Ciao Nicola,

innanzitutto benvenuto su OSM :)

name=Componenti per l'Industria s.r.l.
name:it=COMPI s.r.l

I name:xx si usano per le traduzioni dei nomi, name:it significa che il tag contiene come valore la traduzione in italiano del name. In Italia ci si aspetta siano uguali. Questo essendo un acronimo secondo me si potrebbe taggare come:
name=Componenti per l'Industria s.r.l.
short_name=COMPI s.r.l
Ds5rUy (2022-02-10 12:20:18+00:00): Hi, would you mind explaining why you are deleting a larger number of seemingly valid source tags from objects you don't otherwise touch?
tastrax (2022-03-01 09:28:15+00:00): Can you also explain the meaning of PSP edits?
nevw (2022-03-01 12:12:47+00:00): For your info.…I noticed PSP listed as “Principal shared path routes” under the url_2 tag
https://web.archive.org/web/20090713093031/http://www.dpi.wa.gov.au/cycling/1522.asp
marczoutendijk (2022-02-09 12:03:10+00:00): The roads in the port area are publicly accessible on the map, but I think it is only possible to drive there with special permission? Therefore, it would be better to mark all roads on the property with access=permit or one of the other applicable tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Tresho (2022-03-01 10:30:24+00:00): Ciao, lo spostamento degli edifici non mi sembra corretto.
Bisogna fare attenzione all'offset delle immagini, altrimenti iniziano ad esserci confusione e sovrapposizione tra edifici diversi e anche col reticolo stradale.
Se usi le immagini di bing con JOSM, nel menu  Immagini aeree puoi ottenere lo scostamento che ho salvato mesi fa per Verona e poi salvartelo sempre dallo stesso menu.
Altrimenti se usi altre immagini, crea uno scostamento utilizzando le ortofoto del Veneto come base (o anche gli edifici che sono stati importati e mai spostati).
Ti dico questo solo per avere un po' di uniformità nella mappatura, altrimenti ci si continua a spostare gli elementi a vicenda, come gli edifici in questione.

Matteo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117189779
dvdzero (2022-03-02 23:35:06+00:00): Ciao
Di solito uso Bing e per la zona verona centro non noto grossi spostamenti da applicare è per questo che ho spostato gli edifici. Comunque ricontrollerò lo spostamento che ho applicato. Fammi pure sapere se hai qualcosa di particolare da indicarmi da correggere.
Davide
Tresho (2022-03-03 06:26:07+00:00): A me il dubbio era venuto tempo fa notando delle sovrapposizioni tra edifici e strade dove queste sono più strette e in generale poco "spazio" per mappare altri elementi.
Questo era dovuto al fatto che gli edifici ad un lato della strada avevano uno scostamento diverso rispetto a quelli dell'altro lato, perché dal momento in cui erano stati importati erano stati successivamente spostati leggermente usando le immagini Bing che in effetti non differiscono troppo dall'import originale.
Confrontandomi con altri mappatori, mi è stato suggerito di riportare gli edifici spostati allo scostamento delle ortofoto del Veneto, da cui in effetti mi sembra derivi la posizione degli edifici originariamente importati.
Sono bastati quindi dei revert parziali, come quelli che ho fatto in zona San Zeno/San Bernardino.
E poi ho iniziato ad usare lo scostamento per Bing (che è comunque leggero) come ti dicevo nel precedente commento, che corrisponde circa al tuo spostamento di questo changeset.
Più che altro se hai dovuto fare quello spostamento ti sei già implicitamente accorto di una non concordanza tra edifici (e quindi ortofoto Veneto) e immagini Bing.
Spero di essere stato abbastanza chiaro e scusa se sembra un po' un giro di parole.
marczoutendijk (2022-02-09 12:02:58+00:00): The roads in the port area are publicly accessible on the map, but I think it is only possible to drive there with special permission? Therefore, it would be better to mark all roads on the property with access=permit or one of the other applicable tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
FMBR (2022-02-09 12:17:12+00:00): Correct, this roads are private. I will modify them right now. Thanks for the comment!
GinaroZ (2022-02-09 13:44:29+00:00): Does this actually exist?
Yilang Chen (2022-02-09 14:27:11+00:00): It is an extension of one of the houses
Vinber (2022-02-22 13:05:24+00:00): Bonjour,
les commentaires de groupes de modifications sont faits pour décrire ce que l'on fait (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications).

Au regard du nom du compte, je suppose que c'est dans le cadre d'un cours de SNT au lycée de Ribérac en seconde A. Cela pose quelques problèmes de données personnels. Cela s'applique aux autres commentaires également : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lyceeriberac2ndeA/history.

Voici quelques conseils de bonnes pratiques : https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt

Bonne cartographie avec vos élèves

Vincent
literan (2022-02-09 10:09:21+00:00): не надо криво "править", латиница в русском языке не употребляется.
user_11435438 (2022-02-09 14:44:57+00:00): 啊，这灼热的真理！
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-09 15:25:04+00:00): 聆听真理！
Dimacn (2022-02-09 09:56:57+00:00): Зачем вы удаляете реально существующие объекты? Ваши действия подпадают под вандализм, и об этом будет сообщено в рабочую группу OSM.
mavl (2022-02-09 11:29:46+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
markbegbie (2022-02-09 08:53:41+00:00): It wasn't an import.  Was all individually checked / adjusted from imagery or MapWithAI layer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117190734
Tomas Straupis (2022-02-09 11:03:29+00:00): Atstačiau neteisingai pakeistas landuse=basin reikšmes. (reverted back incorrect change of correct landuse=basin tags).
Eifelkobold! (2022-02-21 09:26:44+00:00): Ich habe diesen Änderungssatz in Änderungssatz 117671404 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117671404) teilweise zurückgesetzt.
user_10241830 (2022-02-09 08:54:21+00:00): Hallo,

der Ortsbezirk Klein-Eichen schreibt sich, jedenfalls laut der Hauptsatzung der Stadt Grünberg, mit Bindestrich. Woher hast du die Variante mit Leerzeichen?
lkw (2022-02-09 15:36:53+00:00): Aus der Autovervollständigung von JOSM, die es aus dem place node hat.  Sonst ist es überall Klein-Eichen.
lkw (2022-02-09 15:44:54+00:00): Habe es korrigiert.
Herman Lee (2022-02-09 14:47:24+00:00): 这里是德州！
Herman Lee (2022-02-09 14:47:15+00:00): 这里是德州！
nw520 (2023-06-11 22:52:58+00:00): Hallo ToniE, bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/271322137/ hast du den Tag bus_bay=y gesetzt. Meinst du vielleicht bus_bay=yes?
ToniE (2023-06-12 07:41:26+00:00): Servus,

das muss wohl ein komplettes Versehen gewesen sein. bus_bay mappe ich eigentlich nur an Straßen und dann mit =left oder =right oder =both. Ich korrigiere das gleich mal.

Vielen Dank,
Toni
Dimacn (2022-02-09 09:43:34+00:00): 1. Не удаляйте существующие дороги чтобы тут же на этом месте добавить новые. Просто редактируйте и изменяете существующие до актуального состояния.
2. Не удаляйте существующие объекты в действительности, например вот этот https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865429541
mavl (2022-02-09 15:21:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок полностью отменён.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Dimacn (2022-02-09 09:24:48+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте новые дороги поверх уже существующих. Вы же дублируете дороги! Просто редактируйте и изменяйте существующие.
Herman Lee (2022-02-09 14:47:05+00:00): 这里是德州！
Bolt026 (2022-03-04 11:48:42+00:00): Hello jmania :) 
Is there a source that changes the situation in the buffer and restricts the access through these ways?
We know that the roads within the buffer zone are controlled and have highly restrictive access.
Thanks!
jmania (2022-03-04 12:28:58+00:00): I live in Cyprus and i use that roads phyisically. These roads are closed to civilian use. When these roads are not arranged as closed, it causes errors in navigation applications. That's why I edit these ways as "permissive".
jmania (2022-03-04 12:30:02+00:00): so these ways must restricted to civilian cars
Bolt026 (2022-03-04 12:45:30+00:00): I also consider access=permissive a good way to restrict access for civilian use. But I was wondering why were these ways (way/202338848, way/178619082) changed to access=no?!
jmania (2022-03-04 14:01:45+00:00): i dont know why. i guess antime ago my navigation app push me to use that closed road. then i look OSM data whatbis srong and i saw that roads are open to every vehicle. sorry for my bad english. i think the situation is something like i said
jmania (2022-03-04 14:03:56+00:00): also you can check it using Magic Earth Navi app for ios. It is seemed that those roads are accessible. waiting for update
jmania (2022-03-04 14:07:44+00:00): you can change them to “permissive”
Bolt026 (2022-03-04 14:13:22+00:00): Thanks a lot for your quick answers and explanations!
I'll make the changes in the map. 
Happy mapping, jmania! 😊
jmania (2022-03-04 16:24:57+00:00): u r welcome ☺️👋
ivanbranco (2022-02-10 18:25:39+00:00): Benvenuto su OSM,

un appunto, dal nome aggiunto sembrerebbe un'attività, ma non c'è nessun tag che descriva che tipo di attività. Inoltre l'edificio ora è taggato come edificio residenziale, questa attività occupa tutto l'edificio o solo parte di esso?
tech_unleadit (2022-02-10 19:52:20+00:00): Grazie ivanbranco!
L'attività è "Progettista grafico a Magenta" su Google Maps.
L'attività occupa soltanto una parte di esso, va bene com'è stata inserita oppure devo sistemarla?

Grazie per l'aiuto
ivanbranco (2022-02-10 19:57:04+00:00): Se occupa solo una parte va inserito come nodo, volendo con l'aggiunta di level=0 se al piano terra o level=1 se al primo piano. Se è l'ufficio di un progettista grafico potrebbe essere taggato con "office=graphic_design".

Figurati, se hai domande fai pure :)
tech_unleadit (2022-02-11 08:47:20+00:00): Grazie!
Provvedo ad inserire il nodo allora e cancello questa modifica.
eggie (2022-02-10 10:21:09+00:00): Dag mapklep..
Ik heb leisure=playground toegevoegd aan het speeltoestel. Dan rendert er iets op de kaart.
gr eggie
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2022-02-09 15:19:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил тег surface. Удалённый тег восстановлен.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-11 13:29:36+00:00): A jest ona we współczesnym użyciu?
Vastuvid23 (2022-02-11 13:56:07+00:00): Jak będzie na mapach to będzie i w użyciu. Na mapach, które sam publikuję staram się umieszczać jak najwięcej nazw, które już istnieją (ale często zostały zapomniane).
maraf24 (2022-02-11 14:29:56+00:00): Będzie lub nie, zależy od popularności mapy.
W OSM reguła jest odwrotna - umieszczamy, to co jest aktualnie, a nie to, co było lub może będzie.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-11 17:37:57+00:00): Z tym że w OSM umieszczamy nazwy które są w aktualnym użyciu.

Te z nikłym ale ciągle jakimś można w old_name dać.

Jak chcesz mapować to co kiedyś było a już nie ma - może https://openhistoricalmap.org/ cię zainteresuje do tego?
user_2066394 (2022-02-09 13:29:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1528875357
Hier gibt es noch Klein Westerfeld. Sind die heute nicht mehr relevant?

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/1528875336
joe248 (2022-02-09 13:51:39+00:00): Ich weiß nicht ob ich das richtig beantworten kann.
Da wo Groß Westerfeld war, entsteht jetzt auf jeden Fall ein großes Gebäude.
Ob sich auf der anderen Straßenseite was ändert kann ich nicht sagen. Ich wüsste nichts davon. Zumindest laut Satellitenbildern ist da nach wie vor eine Wiese/Feld.
Beantwortet das die Frage?
user_2066394 (2022-02-09 13:58:26+00:00): Noch nicht ganz :-) Die Orte waren/sind eingetragen als place=locality und sind damit eigentlich als Ortsbezeichnungen  unabhängig von jeglicher Bautätigkeit.
joe248 (2022-02-17 12:13:39+00:00): Das heißt die Bezeichnung "Groß Westerfelde" sollte erhalten bleiben? Sicher bist du da erfahrener als ich!

Ich wäre davon ausgegangen, dass die Bezeichnung sich erübrigt, wenn  auf dem "Feld" ein Gebäude gebaut wird.

Gibt es die Möglichkeit Commits zu editieren? Oder einfach neu eintragen?
user_2066394 (2022-02-17 12:25:57+00:00): Aktuell haben wir z. B. östlich die Ortsbezeichnungen Klein Westerfeld, Niedermarsch und Auf dem Bockenberge. Wenn es Klein Westerfeld gibt, stellt sich die Frage, was mit Groß Westerfeld ist.
Man müsste einmal verifizieren, welche dieser Ortsangaben aktuell und welche ggf. veraltet sind.
Groß Westerfeld habe ich experimentell zurückgeholt und etwas weiter südlich abgelegt, könnte man im Zweifel mit historic:place=* eintragen.
joe248 (2022-02-17 12:32:49+00:00): Alles klar, danke!
Larmax (2022-02-09 15:58:21+00:00): Hei, miksi lisäsit osoitteet toiseen kertaan kartalle? OSMiin ei pitäisi lähtökohtaisesti lisätä kohteita toiseen kertaan.
user_15044694 (2022-02-09 16:49:26+00:00): Hei, Siksi kun Kuninkaantammenkierto 4:ään tulevat kuljetuspalveluiden lähetit ajavat toistuvasti väärälle talolle tätä osoitetta etsiessään. En tiedä miten tämän ongelman voisi ratkaista. Lähetit ohjautuvat jostain syystä jatkuvasti Turkoosikujalle.
user_15044694 (2022-02-11 10:40:03+00:00): Mietin myös, että voisiko ongelmaan auttaa, jos Kuninkaantammenkierron asuinkatuna muokkaisi alkamaan sieltä, mistä se oikeasti alkaa eli Kuninkaantammenkierto 4:stä. En kuitenkaan osaa muokata ko. katua.
Larmax (2022-02-11 15:12:36+00:00): Vaikea sanoa, en tunne aluetta.
Dimacn (2022-02-09 09:49:42+00:00): Зачем вы удаляете дороги существующие в реальности? Ваши действия подпадают под вандализм!
mavl (2022-02-09 15:16:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Удалённая дорога восстановлена.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607709332
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mueschel (2022-02-26 17:51:04+00:00): Hi,
here are a couple of roads with a 'prov_name' tag - what does this mean?
SekeRob (2022-02-26 18:13:47+00:00): Italy has 3 road referencing

SS = Strada Statale, national
SR = Strada Regionale, regional of which there about 20 in Italy
SP = Strada Provinciale, Provincial. Aquila è.g. has 4 provinces. Each have the same numbering system abreviated ref SP1, SP2 etc etc.
mueschel (2022-02-26 18:18:24+00:00): Yes, I know. But this doesn't explain the 'prov_name' key like these:

name = Strada Provinciale 30
prov_name = Strada Provinciale 30
SekeRob (2022-02-26 18:44:23+00:00): Oh, so you know, did not surmise that from your question, sorry. Well, the purpose is that if a local name comes to light and there nearly doubtlessly is, usually changing name at the city jurisdiction boundaries, we have the nat_name for the Statale, the reg_name for regional and prov_name for the Provincial, pre-empting those who're not good at preserving information.
mueschel (2022-02-26 19:46:15+00:00): Thanks!
I ask because 'prov_name' wasn't used anywhere up to now. I'd assume that 'official_name' would be the best tag - or is there any kind of ambiguity expected where national/regional/provincial name are different?
SekeRob (2022-02-27 09:12:02+00:00): prov_name 3 uses (moi), PROV_name 87 uses, why the caps not known, but going by the names of the tags somewhere in the Indonesian archipelago. official_name  487K uses and even official_name:it with 501 and none of them have a wiki link in TagInfo to describe their utility, but reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:official_name:en my thumbs down. The prov_name seemed the logical extension of the nat_name (114K use) and reg_name key (38K use) but otherwise frankly, it's wurst to me. As so often the documentation is wholly wanting, we(me) map by gut feeling. Let me know what the boss ruling is.

Have a nice Sunday
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Temat-Droga (2022-02-09 18:30:47+00:00): Proszę o zaprzestanie wycofania moich edycji bo po prostu masz mnie za debila.
maraf24 (2022-02-11 16:16:29+00:00): Nic podobnego, po prostu musisz mieć poparcie społeczności na te zmiany.
A w przypadku części z nich - tych na terenie Wrocławia, w którym to mieście mieszkam i którego układ drogowy znam - widzę,  że się mylisz. A jak tu się mylisz, to pewnie gdzie indziej również.
Yunkers (2022-02-09 15:09:03+00:00): Hej, możesz jeszcze wycofać 117166831? To moja zmiana, kiedy poprawiłem najbardziej rażące zmiany, teraz jest dziura w kategoriach.
maraf24 (2022-02-09 18:41:51+00:00): Załatałem dziurę. Czy coś jest jeszcze nie tak?
Yunkers (2022-02-09 18:50:12+00:00): Zobaczę jak się zaktualizują mapy.
Temat-Droga (2022-02-10 08:36:52+00:00): Maraf24... Podasz jakiś sensowny argument do tego czemu te drogi mają mieć kategorie taką jaką ci sie podoba poza tym że mnie nienawidzisz?
maraf24 (2022-02-11 16:58:33+00:00): @Temat-Droga: ja przywracam kategorie dróg do stanu sprzed Twoich edycji, na które najwyraźniej zgody ogółu nie dostałeś i z którymi się sam nie zgadzam.
eggie (2022-02-09 21:12:48+00:00): 
Dag Jo.. Je vraagt feedback.. Er is inderdaad geen verbinding met de parkeerplaats.
Het stukje weg achter het hek mag overigens wel op de kaart met de toevoeging access=private. Ik zie dat een medemapper al iets heeft aangepast. Alleen lastig te zien wat.
Wellicht de niet bestaande verbinding verwijderd?
Je  laatste edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117195417
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2022-02-10 13:13:53+00:00): Hi Giorgio,

isn't this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9492044215 
a duplicate of this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1029564816/history

?
aceman444 (2022-02-12 11:29:52+00:00): Dakujem. Nebude Ekofarma landuse=farmland, alebo len farmyard, ak su tam len budovy a pestuju niekde inde? place=farm je nieco ine.
Barroszt (2024-10-25 23:04:26+00:00): dk 39 primary????? Naprawdę??? Nawet węzła nie mają z A4. Radzę dokładniej przyjrzeć się mapie.
maraf24 (2024-10-26 09:04:07+00:00): Pozwól, że wyjaśnię. Temat-Droga dostał bana i miał zakazane nie tylko zmieniać drogi w OSM, ale i edytować OSM. 
Stąd też jego zestawy zostały hurtem wycofane, bez rozpatrywania, czy może w danym zestawie zmiana była trafna.
Bo gdy ktoś nie stosuje się do zasad, to inni mapujący nie mają obowiązku tracić swój czas na dogłębne analizy.
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-10 12:22:58+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117243886
literan (2022-02-09 15:50:27+00:00): это не дубликат, а сервис. Верну корректные теги
user_5359 (2022-02-18 07:44:15+00:00): Hello! Could we also change https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715351220 from leisure=pitch to landuse=cosntruction (later with newer aerial iamge to building)?
szjozsef (2022-02-18 08:25:32+00:00): Yes !
The constructionn is already done and was opened on 17 Feb 2022
I created the poi mainly to have the correct street address.

https://www.bizbrasov.ro/2022/02/16/foto-cum-arata-noul-magazin-kaufland-din-tractorul-care-se-va-deschide-maine-dimineata-cu-ce-oferte-speciale-sunt-asteptati-clientii/
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-09 11:16:16+00:00): based on a trip there
MxxCon (2022-02-09 23:57:11+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? I live in the area and can confirm if this is the current state of the intersection. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117197742