piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2020-01-28 23:31:19+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Belobog (2020-01-29 23:32:25+00:00): Please use the changeset comments to tell us something that we didn't know already.

This is no criticism of your work itself, which is highly appreciated!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-01-29 13:29:33+00:00): Boa tarde,

pode fundamentar o nome que atribuiu a este trilho se faz favor. Outra questão, "trilho" não faz parte do nome, trilho é a classificação da via. 

Aguardo resposta.


Cumprimentos
ervideira (2020-01-29 18:30:57+00:00): Boa tarde,
Este trilho foi aberto pelos sócios da Associação BTT Caldas para a Maratona BTT que organizámos em 5 de outubro de 2018 e eu próprio fiquei incubido de fazer a ligação entre os setores dos trilhos do mar sem ser necessário recorrer ir à Estrada Atlântica. 
Mais tarde, cada vez que lá passávamos, os sócios recorriam a este nome para identificar este troço do percurso junto às arribas.
Mas claro que não faço questão que tenha esse nome (era só à falta de outro qualquer, mesmo inapropriado).
Boa tarde e bom trabalho.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-01-30 00:14:43+00:00): boa noite, é no mínimo suspeito que haja um trilho com o seu nome de utilizador e que o trilho tenha cerca de 100 metros apenas. Há alguma fonte onde podemos validar a informação que mencionou?
Shaun das Schaf (2020-01-29 10:14:08+00:00): Hallo WHAuerhahn, willkommen auf OSM!

Zwei Anmerkungen zu deinen Änderungen:

Zum einen existiert für den Schlüssel "building" kein gültiger Wert "Hotel/Restaurant" (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building). Dieser Wert sollte deshalb auch nicht verwendet werden. Wann immer möglich, sollte man bereits vorhandene (dokumentierte) Schlüssel und deren Werte verwenden.

Zum anderen bestehen für die von dir hinzugefügten Informationen bereits zwei Nodes innerhalb des Gebäudes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5949661800 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5949661801).
Du solltest jetzt eine der folgenden Möglichkeiten wählen:

1. Die beiden Nodes löschen und alle Informationen nur dem Gebäude hinzugefügen. In diesem Fall solltest du die Tags "building=yes", "tourism=hotel" und "amenity=restaurant" setzen. Oder:
2. Das Gebäude selbst bekommt nur die Adresse, Stockwerkzahl und Höhe. Statt "building=Hotel/Restaurant" wird wieder "building=yes" eingestellt. Hotel- und restaurantspezifische Informationen werden dann den bereits existierenden Nodes hinzugefügt. Informationen die sowohl auf das Hotel wie auch auf das Restaurant zutreffen wie z.B. die Website musst du dann eventuell beiden Nodes hinzufügen. Diese Variante hat den Vorteil, dass auf der Karte sowohl das Hotel- als auch das Restaurantsymbol dargestellt werden.

Es empfiehlt sich zudem, noch weitere Informationen des Hotels und des Restaurants hinzuzufügen. Besuche doch mal die entsprechenden Wikiseiten:
Hotel: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
Restaurant: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant

Viele Grüße,
Shaun das Schaf
PT-53 (2020-01-29 14:26:05+00:00): Hallo,
es ist durchaus üblich, für ein Hotel mit Restaurant 2 sepatate POI-KNoten anzulegen und die Hotel- und Restaurant-Infos dort getrennt einzutragen. Viele Apps kommen mit einem gemeinsamen Eintrag für Hotel und Restaurat nicht zurecht und werten nur eines der beiden Merkmale aus.
Grüße
DRBryant (2020-01-28 19:57:56+00:00): Tag should say "intermittent" not intermediate. Sorry for confusion.
nurdafur (2020-02-19 14:17:59+00:00): HI Curran

Welcome as a new mapper!
In this changeset you did some wrong corrections. The sidewalk on the west-side of Bietenholzstrasse is a combined foot- and cycle-path from Vogelsangstrasse until after the  bridge. The connection from the  sidewalk to Bietenholzstrasse just south from the roundabout is for cyclists coming from Volketswil. There is another access from the sidewalk  just a few meters south for the cyclists towards Volketswil.
The sidewalk is all the way for cyclists on route 45 in both directions so they do not have to cross die road.
Please change it so it is accurate again.

Thank your
Urs
PS: If something is unclear or your need help with sorting die route 45 I am glad to help you.
Just ask me.
Curran919 (2020-02-19 15:29:56+00:00): Hi Urs,
I think the truth is somewhere in between? I took this photo a few days ago, as I also felt I had made a mistake. It seems clear that southbound cycle traffic, even when continuing on to Vogelsangstrasse, should exit the sidewalk before turning. Am I missing something?
https://photos.app.goo.gl/JH6WXuSLkmogSr4e7
Curran
nurdafur (2020-02-20 05:16:24+00:00): Hi curran

I was not there the last days. I wrote from memory. So yes, all southbound have to leave.
Have fun mapping. It is addictive! ;)
Urs
opendcc (2020-01-29 04:08:31+00:00): Hallo,

die Frage ist, wie gehen wir mit so einer Einstellung um: da liegt jetzt eine mit Kommentar versehene, aber nur bedingt relevante Relation rum. D.h. jeder, da an den Highways was macht (weil eben neue Abfahrt, neuer Kreisel) usw. hat deswegen Pflegeaufwand - und wenn Du jemals in ein Nest aus Buslinien einen Kreisel reingebaut hast, dann verstehst Du was ich meine). Vielleicht sollte man solche Relationen dann auch mal rauswerfen - getagged wird, what's on ground.

Servus Wolfgang (der Dein Herzblut als Ersteller/Pfleger auch versteht ..)
user_5359 (2020-12-22 06:58:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/743459643: Is the admin_level value correct?
mueschel (2020-01-29 08:53:16+00:00): Hi,
you added many objects with the tag 'Name:de'. Could you fix the spelling, keys should be in lowercase.

Thanks!
Iro16 (2020-01-29 09:55:13+00:00): Oh, thanks, I will do that!
user_5359 (2020-01-29 05:13:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.
fx99 (2020-02-08 01:38:57+00:00): did you miss some tags on way 41831020?
Bierphysik (2023-12-09 19:00:21+00:00): Hi. DU hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767699785/history als "toten" Weg gemappt: dieser Weg ist mit keinem anderen Weg verbunden und steht sozusagen unerreichbar in der Landschaft. Ist das korrekt?
4004 (2020-02-02 18:10:36+00:00): i was under the impression we added kerb details to crossings?
whatmeinfallible (2020-02-03 19:28:23+00:00): hi 4004, 
I moved the barrier:kerb tag to node 1790569474/node 3643504632 adjacent. The barrier:kerb page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb says "Combining with highway=crossing is usually a mistake; include kerb=* on the crossing node, but *not* barrier=kerb as there will usually not be a kerb across the major highway".
4004 (2020-02-04 10:12:53+00:00): ah yes, my mistake, thanks
Hjart (2020-01-28 22:06:10+00:00): Please note that these roundabouts should not be classified as trunk, because that would prevent cyclists etc from passing from i.e. Orionvej to Erhvervsparken.
Hjart (2020-01-28 22:14:04+00:00): See i.e. this sign at the exit of one the roundabouts: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/dn_trdp00ViEc7YohzcK_Q . This sign is seen here because this is where the trunk starts. The roundabout itself isn't trunk. I've reverted your change
osmviborg (2020-01-29 07:13:07+00:00): They are trunks. Allowing cyclists etc. to the roundabout is done by adding the appropriate tags.
Hjart (2020-01-29 17:11:16+00:00): If you enter the roundabouts from one of the sideroads you won't see a trunk sign, so, no, they are not trunks.
osmviborg (2020-01-29 18:36:17+00:00): Driving on Vestvejen, there in not the sign 'E 45 trunk end'. The roundabout is trunk, so is the road until you se sign E 45. Look at the mapillary pictures, there is no sign E 45 before the roundabout.
Hjart (2020-01-29 18:48:49+00:00): Again, if the roundabouts here were trunk, you would see a trunk sign when entering from one of the side roads. We unfortunately don't have any Mapillary from there, but I bet you won't any such signs there, which means they can't be trunk.
Bulls_eye (2020-02-03 17:53:47+00:00): Hello Hjart,

I used OSM global policy for roundabouts to justify reclassifying the roundabout junctions to trunks (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Selection_of_the_right_highway_tag) “If there are several roads of different importance connecting to the roundabout, you should usually use the one with the greatest importance…”). I understand bicycles should be allowed along the roundabout, and that a trunk would normally block that. However, allowing bicycles can be done using a bicycle or similar tag. 

I appreciate the Mapillary image that you linked, however it only covers one of the junctions. The other junctions unfortunately lack sufficient Mapillary imagery to make similar determinations. 

I also wanted to ask if you think the trunk_links would be better suited as trunks. Per global policy, “Links are also used in roundabout designs that physically separate a specific turn from the main roundabout.” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link) What do you think about removing the link tags?

Thanks again for your help around here. If you have any more helpful tips for mapping to accommodate bike routing in Denmark, please let me know!

- Bulls_eye
Hjart (2020-02-03 22:30:04+00:00): Please note https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29013201. In Mapillary you'll see signs here coming from both north and south, very clearly notifying you that the trunk classification stops right before the roundabout and starts again right after. Personally I think official local classification should be prioritized over "OSM policy".
Hjart (2020-02-03 23:20:35+00:00): I just fixed a similar case, which I mistakenly classified as trunk myself 6 years ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24480249
atomwaffen (2020-01-29 16:03:27+00:00): Why are you deleting the more exact landuses from CTR Veneto?
taxi301 (2020-01-28 22:11:05+00:00): trochę to zamieszało na mapie i jest industrial na industrial , teren PŻB
azalizh (2020-01-28 22:21:29+00:00): Może nie ta edycja (bo tu korekta granicy residential), ale dodanie relation port morski Kołobrzeg https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10646932
Takie rozwiązanie wybrano dla portów. Sam PŻB jest jako punkt w tej okolicy. Zastanawiałem się nad tym ograniczeniem tego obszaru ale źródła brak dla PŻB. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi.
Mammi71 (2024-05-13 19:28:55+00:00): Hallo Daniel,
woher hast Du den name=Ziegeleisee?  udo-bw? Da ist nicht immer alles richtig, was da steht! 
Dieser See gehörte zwar auch zur alten Ziegelei, heißt aber anders. Rate mal, warum das NSG Rehfeldsee heißt.
hauke-stieler (2020-01-28 23:09:13+00:00): Sorry, source was Bing and ESRI imagery.
user_5359 (2020-01-29 05:09:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7137786254#map=18/44.05173/-123.07933 over 100 meters (and the river), so there were problems with the corresponding way. Please check the situation and add the tag bridge=yes if this is right.
Benny Goodman (2020-01-29 15:21:12+00:00): "An Luftbild angepasst" sagt uns nichts, was wir nicht schon wüssten. Schreib doch bitte stets, was du konkret gemappt hast ;)
Bąbel (2020-05-22 10:44:27+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie rozwaliłeś budynek Hali targowej  rysowanej pod 3D.
brakło wiedzy czy wyobraźni?.
Nie masz pojęcia to nie ruszaj.
FreierFriese (2020-02-03 00:52:42+00:00): What do you mean by saying "no lane visible". There IS a lane, maybe not at Esri or Mapbox fotos, but on newer bing-fotos it is visible. Btw, I checked everything on the ground cycling via the "Schutzstreifen".
FreierFriese (2020-02-03 00:53:58+00:00): P.S. I forgot to delete "bicycle=use_sidepath" when adding cycleway.right=lane.
emvee (2020-02-03 21:08:53+00:00): Not sure how I concluded there is no lane visible, maybe it was just a copu-and-paste error from my previous commit, but if you know the situation on the ground, that is leading.

What is strange to my opinion is to have a way with "cycleway.right=lane" and on the other side a bi-directional bicycle road. As far as I know these bicycle roads should be taken and therefore "bicycle=use_sidepath".

Is the "problem" maybe that the cycle path on the north is one-directional?
gurglypipe (2020-01-29 10:06:47+00:00): Unless I have misunderstood, changing Lancaster from an area to a node is not what the tagging wiki says for railway stations (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation#A_Simple_Railway_Station). What's the goal here?
DaveF (2020-01-29 17:19:55+00:00): Hi Thanks for contacting.
My main aim is to improve the quality of the OSM database. Usually I'd say mapping as polygons is advantageous, but after updating many of the UK's stations tags it's clear it's not true in this case. There appears to be confusion as to the extent that should be mapped. Take Lancaster as an example which extended well South of the platforms. Should its track areas, scrub, disused tracks & platforms all be included? Mapping as a node allows its accurate positioning within the central area of the station, between the tracks & roughly midpoint of the platforms. It can be tweaked to allow clear rendering of the label so it doesn't clash with other entities.

Please note, I've not removed any information*

The wiki page is for the railway=station tag *not* PT2 which is cuckooing in order to promote itself. It is a schema which purely duplicates the original scheme. It adds no extra quality to OSM & has led to many getting confused how to tag correctly.. I think that graphic should be amended.

I believe I've mapped in accordance with railway=station schema. 

*Not intentionally, anyway.

PS Are you local? Are platforms 1 & 2 operational? I don't think the tracks should be tagged as sidings if that's the case.
gurglypipe (2020-01-31 09:33:45+00:00): The PTv2 documentation for public_transport=station says that stations should be mapped as areas unless the outline is not known (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstation).

I don’t disagree with you, but I think there is a reduction of information by tagging the station outline as a railway corridor rather than something more specific.

In any case, would you consider updating the wiki? Having the wiki document one thing while people are actively changing away from that is going to lead to confusion and duplicated work as people continue to map to the old schema.

I am local. Platforms 1 and 2 are operational; platform 6 (the eastmost platform, which is already tagged as disused) is not.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service#Railways seems to suggest that service=siding is correct for those tracks, but I don’t really know (or care!). If you’re sure the tagging is wrong please do change it. :-)
Glassman (2020-01-29 17:54:01+00:00): The tag you are looking for is highway=speed_camera. Also, we don't use descriptive names only the actual signed name.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80222413
dantran[dot]net (2020-01-30 23:12:17+00:00): Where do I enter the tag you suggested?  in the Name field?  BTW this is not a speed camera, rather a photo enforcement stop camera
Glassman (2020-01-31 01:51:53+00:00): We don't have an approved tag for redlight cameras. The closest is highway=speed_camera. You can enter any tag, even made up ones, such as highway=redlight_camera.

To enter the tag, look towards the bottom on the left hand side for tags. Just change the name= to highway= and either speed_camera or redlight_camera. You choice.
seattlefyi (2020-02-27 08:14:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing, though these and the new ones added today are still incorrectly tagged (using the name field). Adding custom tags isn't hard, but does take a little instruction. I'll try to explain: 1. In the ID editor (which you're already using) select a node. 2. In the leftmost panel, scroll down until you see "All Tags" and expand it. 3. Click the + sign to add a new tag, and fill the left box with highway, and the right box with redlght_camera. Also explained at the following URL (search for "All tags")  to see a screenshot: https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#additional-information-and-custom-tags
seattlefyi (2020-02-27 08:36:15+00:00): There is also an approved way of mapping these using relations and the "enforcement" tag. This might be more accurate since they are enforced in specific traffic directions. That however is an advanced technique. Perhaps Glassman can chime in here?!
maraf24 (2020-02-03 14:45:03+00:00): Usunąłeś informacje o światłach na przejściach dla pieszych.
aixbrick (2020-02-09 10:21:10+00:00): Hallo,
OSM Inspector meldet ein Problem: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.12835&lat=50.77305&zoom=18. Der innere und der äußere Ring berühren sich in mehr als einem Punkt. Bitte schaue dir das mal an. Gleiches Problem auch hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10631194.
Gruß
aachso (2020-02-09 12:11:13+00:00): Hi aixbrick, danke für den Hinweis! Ist in beiden Fällen so entstanden, dass sie sich ursprünglich nicht berührten und ein Multipolygon nötig war, ich das dann später aber doch noch verschoben habe, aber das Multipolygon nicht entfernt habe.

OSM Inspector kannte ich noch nicht, das merk ich mir direkt mal.

Die beiden Probleme sind jetzt gefixt.
aixbrick (2020-02-09 12:37:52+00:00): Danke
freebeer (2020-02-13 06:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80939164 where the changeset comment is: despite multiple user blocks, you continue to add this fictional rubbish to osm
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-29 00:06:37+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 71621881, 71621952, 71621972, 71622000, 71622003, 71622040, 71622051, 71622054, 71622070, 71622076, 71622084, 72154727, 73941356, 74732736, 75176108, 75747238, 77342897.
Glassman (2020-01-29 17:49:58+00:00): Do you know the name of the road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80223809
Glassman (2020-01-29 17:57:51+00:00): Unless McCarthy's Farm is a recognized landmark, personal information should not be added to OSM. Can you fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80223856
Glassman (2020-01-29 17:36:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80223980
viloan (2020-01-29 01:04:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Glassman (2020-01-29 17:57:02+00:00): They grow a lot of grass in Cle Elum.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80224086
korolenok (2020-02-04 11:43:04+00:00): Hi, MatthewAndersonUS80! It will be better to tag airplanes as historic=aircraft (building=yes is not a good idea). Look at the example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/49.31070/8.44617
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80224095
viloan (2020-01-29 01:16:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
datendelphin (2020-01-29 18:22:59+00:00): Hoi Moritzzzzz. Was wolltest du da machen? Du hast hier ein Duplikat Schluechtstrasse erstellt, das ist so nicht sinnvoll. Grüsse Michael
Moritzzzzz (2020-01-29 19:43:21+00:00): Hi Michael,
da hast Du Recht! Wollte eigentlich nur sicherstellen, dass die Knoten der Kreuzungen verknüpft sind. War aber nicht meine Absicht ein Duplikat zu erstellen. 
Das sollte somit besser nicht veröffentlicht werden!

Danke!

Viele Grüße,
Moritz
datendelphin (2020-01-29 20:03:06+00:00): Das war schon veröffentlicht :) da gibt es keine Verzögerung. Du kannst prüfen, ob die Strassen richtig verbunden sind, in dem du den Kreuzungspunkt testweise verschiebst. Danach natürlich mit Rückgängig die änderung wieder entfernen. Ansonsten siehst du im Editor einen zweiten Punkt, welchen du mit dem anderen verbinden kannst.
datendelphin (2020-01-29 20:04:16+00:00): Die Schluechstrasse ist jedenfalls richtig verbunden.
Moritzzzzz (2020-01-29 21:48:18+00:00): Ok super! Muss ich irgendwas wieder entfernen jetzt? Oder ists jetzt in Ordnung?
Danke für deine Erklärung!!
datendelphin (2020-01-30 05:57:57+00:00): Bitte gerne. Nein ist gut. Ich habe das Duplikat bereits entfernt.
skquinn (2020-01-29 05:41:25+00:00): What the heck is this supposed to be?
Spails (2020-01-30 19:11:11+00:00): Why does this change span 90% of the continental United States?
skquinn (2020-01-30 19:40:22+00:00): A couple changes in Washington state and a couple of changes in mid-Florida will do that. This is why you save your work before moving to another area.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-29 22:54:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80281065 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80272973 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-January/024083.html for more details.
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-01 22:43:48+00:00): What source did you use?