piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sharagar (2020-05-15 16:22:06+00:00): thanks for looking into  our edits. please go through the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68933 for detailed understanding of the private imagery we are utilizing. This edit has been made based on the private imagery dated 18-2-2020. we have encountered a sign board stating "Anlieger frei", post translating to english it was found as "open for residents" and "residents only". We have cross verified this with the osm wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access and added the access as private. post the community feedback, we performed keen deepdive and found the sign board in the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Ddestination which is supposed to be a destination, and aligning with the community feedback. we have reverted the changeset as per the wiki and the community suggestion.
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-08 05:38:19+00:00): Should be reviewed.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=84819239

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Flurps (2020-11-02 17:51:04+00:00): A bunch of bad geometry and tagging in this change (#adt)
Keramikos (2020-11-03 20:10:57+00:00): Hi Flurps, Thank you for catching this! I have reviewed these edits and corrected them.
Britzz (2020-05-10 17:24:36+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est OK
Une remarque house = terrace n'est probalement pas adapté (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace), building = house ou building = yes conviendraient mieux je pense mais à vous de juger, 
Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84820886
Herrieman (2021-12-08 00:57:34+00:00): Ik ga de u-turn restricties hier verwijderen, aangezien er volgens mij geen juridische basis is om niet te mogen omkeren. Mocht ik iets over het hoofd zien, dan hoor ik het graag.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-06 13:34:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7492121993/history  what is your source for this edit?
skfd (2020-05-07 13:28:39+00:00): Привет! Объясните плз по-подробнее что вы имеете ввиде, пожалуйста
osmviborg (2020-05-07 10:49:30+00:00): Nu er der så to cykelstier. Cykelstien er tagget sammen med selve Boulevarden, cycleway:right=track
AsgerFrank (2020-05-10 09:11:12+00:00): Skift til kortlag Cykelkort for at se "fadæsen", som ikke er ualmindelig. 
Vær forresten opmærksom på at visningen Cykelkort tit opdateres temmelig forsinket.
mifrira (2020-05-10 12:34:37+00:00): Tak for tippet!
Prøver at "undo" ændringen. 
Jeg prøvede at rette at cykelstien på Amagerbrogade var markeret forkert - den endte blindt på kortet
locke (2020-08-31 12:42:12+00:00): Hallo, du hast an einigen Wegen kürzlich ein access=no eingetragen. Allerdings steht weiterhin foot=yes und bicycle=yes, so dass die Wege weiterhin für Wanderer und Radfahrer frei wären. Ist das so gewollt? Oder sind die Wege komplett gesperrt?
Schönen Gruß, Locke
HansWürstchen (2020-08-31 15:49:27+00:00): Hallo, nein, das war nicht so gewollt, die Wege wurden neu ausgeschildert, und markiert, der Weg ist Mittlerweile großteils zugeworfen.
Mein Fehler, da war ich ein wenig zu fix, danke!
MfG, HansWürstchen.
eastender (2020-05-08 14:17:34+00:00): The current postcode of RH16 8LL for the Cricket Pavilion in Balcombe is being flagged in the daily postcode errors report (https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-errors.html). The web site for the Balcombe Cricket Club specifies it as RH17 6PA. So, I suggest that is the correct postcode.
eggie (2020-05-07 11:30:42+00:00): Oke met die tafels .. Nu zit de landuse aan elkaar (fietspad en gras) .. Ik kijk wel even. No problem. Zal access=no nog verwijderen van dat zuidelijke stuk.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84822715
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets in te houden.
MVG,
eggie
jaimeMF (2020-05-07 18:15:40+00:00): Gracias por añadir la fuente. En este caso no hay que darle nombre. La etiqueta amenity=drinking_water ya indica que es una fuente de agua potable.
gabro00 (2020-05-07 19:06:24+00:00): Jelzett, csak nagyon hiányosan. Jó volna kideríteni létezik vagy sem. A kihelyezett táblák több, mint 10 évesek, amit egy Uniós pályázat keretében raktak ki. Nem lennék meglepve, ha csak terv maradt vagy elfogyott a pénz menet közben.

Ilyenek ezek a bizonyos táblák: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/KOLcSGmfkpmhysoDp867rw
A kiírt domaint is azóta más üzemelteti, szóval nem tudom, lehet le kellene venni.
skfd (2020-05-07 14:58:21+00:00): Добрый день!
А чем фирма занимается?
skfd (2020-05-07 14:59:36+00:00): Еще полезно указать какие-то контактыююю
iWowik (2020-05-11 09:52:30+00:00): Нет в Московской области больше никаких поселений, ни сельских, ни городских
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80177578
bingo (2021-04-18 09:33:42+00:00): Dieses Gebäude ist nicht in der Denkmalliste, vermutlich meinst du Schloß Höhenroth 50m südöstlich von hier http://m.osmtools.de/0gcc92tbFH4J
user_2066394 (2021-04-18 10:11:24+00:00): Quelle war der folgende Fehlerhinweis:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1135353

Höhenroth hatte ich hier entnommen:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Baudenkm%C3%A4ler_in_Grafrath
bingo (2021-04-18 15:07:36+00:00): Mir fehlen hier die Ortskenntnisse, aber Höhenroth ist auch eine Adresse d.h. es fehlt auch ein Straßenname mit dem Namen Höhenroth. Laut Denkmalliste hat das sog. Schloss Höhenroth 3 Adressen: Höhenroth 1, Höhenroth 2 und Höhenroth 3: https://www.geodaten.bayern.de/denkmal_static_data/externe_denkmalliste/pdf/denkmalliste_merge_179125.pdf
user_2066394 (2021-04-18 18:05:49+00:00): Ich gehe mittlerweile fest davon aus, dass im ursprünglichen Fehlerhinweis der Marker definitiv falsch gesetzt war und dein Standort korrekt ist. War wie gesagt reines Remote-Mapping, Fehlermitteilungsmapping habe ich mittlerweile größtenteils eingestellt, weil das teilweise noch Monate später Rückfragen generiert, siehe aktuelles Beispiel :-)
bingo (2021-04-19 07:09:31+00:00): ok, dann lassen wir es dabei, bis jemand mit Ortskenntnissen das korrigiert :-)
Britzz (2020-05-10 17:21:50+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est OK

Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84823638
user_6771650 (2020-05-23 19:16:47+00:00): Hello ArtOfTheTrek_Sayyed,

Alltrails.com states that its data is copyrighted and not intended for commercial use (ie OSM data). Did you get consent to use Alltrails to add to OSM? OSM takes copyright very seriously and that is why it can provide free and open map data.
user_6771650 (2020-05-23 19:19:26+00:00): Alternative sources that you could use include:

1. National Park Service maps
2. The strava heatmap
3. Do an on-the-ground survey of the trail or use other public gps tracks
ArtOfTheTrek_Sayyed (2020-05-24 22:04:28+00:00): Hi, Thanks for your note.
I just wasn't know that data of Alltrails are copyrighted.
I have re-edited the trail based on a satellite imagery, you can check in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85695904
EdLoach (2020-05-22 09:48:01+00:00): This should be in the opposite corner, really. I might move it when I get a moment (I shop there quite often, though have never been to the café).
CjMalone (2020-05-22 11:13:16+00:00): It would be awesome if you could place it more accurately. Thank you.
literan (2020-05-07 20:11:31+00:00): добрый день. Есть подозрение что вы тропинки рисуете по одному-единственному треку с телефона? ведь не бывает таких кривых тропинок
Unchqua (2020-05-08 10:22:21+00:00): Да, по одному треку. Но они реально такие кривые, порой идёшь по лесу змейкой, например нарисованная тропа на севере вчерашнего пакета правок заброшена и почти не проглядывается, и она вот так въётся по лесу.
Некоторые места я проходил дважды туда-обратно — два трека почти сливаются в одну линию.
literan (2020-05-08 12:13:55+00:00): ну, я все же хочу попросить вас критично относиться к качеству треков со смартфонов - в лесу они могут на 20 м в стороны гулять
Unchqua (2020-05-08 12:17:13+00:00): Хорошо, буду мапить менее подробно в таком окружении. Может расчехлю свой Гармин и сравню получаемые треки.
Britzz (2020-05-10 17:20:13+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : beaucoup des bâtiments que vous avez ajoutés existent sur la couche cadastre, en l'affichant, vous pourriez, si souhaité, les dessiner plus précisément.
Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).

Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84824706
Flurps (2020-10-08 10:02:12+00:00): This change has a bunch of errors; Most of it is needless changes to road geometry which degrades its quality (you are mapping how cars drive, not "what is on the ground" as OSM editing should be). Just reporting this for #adt purposes.
Casentenisi (2020-10-09 20:44:23+00:00): Hi Flurps, Thank you for reaching out. I made these edits to better align the roads to ESRI imagery.
ma-rt-in (2020-05-08 18:00:11+00:00): Hallo,
es freut mich das du Daten zu OSM hinzugefügt hast. Leider hast du die Bedeutung von name vermutlich etwas missverstanden. Den Hydrant bekommen in nur sehr selten Fällen einen Namen. Bitte entferne diesen. 

vg
pyram (2020-05-07 20:09:31+00:00): Hi majesty06,

thank you for trying to help,
but please beware of double tagging highways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801027416 ( see existing way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/716896660 )
If you want to use an other classification of this existing highway see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
That means this "residential" should maybe be a  "tertiary" road, but never a "motorway"( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway ).

Best regard
pyram
DP24PH (2020-05-09 01:50:32+00:00): It seems that there's an intrusion of the changeset boundary to the Republic of the Philippines. Kindly disclose the full location, and if possible, reduce it into per country basis (due to differences in country guidelines for editing). Your kind understanding is highly appreciated. Thank you.

DEARPAUL24
BCNorwich (2020-05-08 17:46:24+00:00): Hi, I want to let you know that in deleting the footpath around Peto's Marsh you have broken the linear route relation of the Via Beata long distance path. You have also deleted other existing features. Please be aware that you ought to strive to maintain all existing features on OSM when you make amendments. If the Via Beata way has changed have you tried to ascertain it's new route? If you need help amending the route relation please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
Hide1! (2020-05-08 18:53:20+00:00): Hi there, I’m not entirely sure what the Via Beata is as a path as around the circumference of Peto’s marsh there is no public access, if this is something different I am more that happy for you to correct that issue. If it has changed however, I am unaware of where it now goes. In addition, any features I may have removed that should be there, again feel free to correct this. Its quite hard as the bing maps overlay is a bit out of date, google maps shows more up to date imagery. Thank you for your kind words, Andy.
eggie (2020-05-07 11:50:56+00:00): Oke Erik , maar we taggen niet nog eens het adres op de buildingshape van het gebouw zelf. dat kan er weer vanaf. 
Wanneer bij nr 13 geen adresnode meer is gewoon even de tagging lenen van een buurpand en op een node taggen met het juiste huisnummer.
Doe je het zelf?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-07 13:42:09+00:00): Erik,
Van pand nr 22 heb ik ook even het duplikaatadres verwijderd
MVG,
eggie
goedegazelle (2020-05-07 14:34:32+00:00): Beste Erik,
Ik ben zo vrij geweest om één building:level over te hevelen naar roof:level.

Meet je zelf de hoogte nog even op? :)
BCNorwich (2020-05-07 13:26:36+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I made the cycleway and old railway same line, removed layer and building tag from the garden center area. Also split the lake into two at the causeway.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-05-08 17:49:09+00:00): I've moved the bins off of the highway center line so folk don't fall over them.
Regards Bernard.
Hide1! (2020-05-08 19:04:28+00:00): Ok good plan, don’t want any unnecessary injuries, epsecially at the moment. Many thanks, Andy.
topius (2020-05-07 13:15:03+00:00): Hi. Why change it to unclassified? This is an asphalted road that has enough space for two vehicles to pass, and it connects larger villages (and an important national high school). According to the East Africa Tagging Guideline, that should be followed in the case of Papua New Guinea, this road should classify as a Tertiary way.
Finisterre (2020-05-08 04:25:47+00:00): Thanks for providing more information about this road. Tertiary seems to be a reasonable classification.
Britzz (2020-05-08 15:39:55+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : gloabalement ça semble bon.
Une remarque vous avez identifié "Clinique Vétérinaire de La Clauvade" sur la bâtiment pré-existant ET créé un nouveau point : il y en un de trop ;-)
Si le bâtiment n'est que la clinique, le choix 1 est suffisant et vous pouvez supprimer le point (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7492550987).
NB : créer des points est nécessaire quand plusieurs commerces dans un même bâtiment.

Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84829022
Marych_ (2020-05-08 13:21:43+00:00): Добрый день

если название на узбекской кирилице, то надо менять тег на
name:uz-cyr

Если на латинице, то name:uz не нужен
Константин Гам (2020-05-07 14:25:33+00:00): Добавляя супермаркет, пожалуйста внесните сразу его время работы. Без оного его добавление как бы половина успеха ...
Danysan95 (2020-05-12 19:36:12+00:00): Cosa significa source="ds4273"?
Cascafico (2020-05-13 05:51:58+00:00): http://dati.comune.bologna.it/node/4273
AndersAndersson (2020-05-07 16:00:29+00:00): Är det officiella namnet Jan-Matsdammen eller är det en lokal benämning?
Skriv in det som name eller loc_name på sjön.
Annars kan jag göra det bara jag vet vad som gäller.
Gustavo22Soares (2020-12-05 14:20:13+00:00): ola estradas rurais são highway=unclassfield não highway=residencial
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
Pueyrredon (2020-12-07 19:00:04+00:00): Hello PlayzinhoAgro. Thank you for your advice here. I will change those and follow that rural classification for these roads type in the future. Thanks!

Olá PlayzinhoAgro. Obrigado por seu conselho aqui. Vou mudar isso e seguir essa classificação rural para esse tipo de estrada no futuro. Obrigado!
Frans S (2020-05-22 12:02:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A request. When mappings highways and buildings, never let a building cross a highway.  A navigation system cannot find a route with a highway  goes through a building  :-)
PLease square each rectangular building with the Q key in iDeditor.
Pay also attention on the issues on the triangle at the right hand menu.
About what and not to map
See this document
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
Best regards
Frans S (2020-05-26 13:59:11+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
Please do not connect highways to buildings as per attachted image
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fESbUtSdb2p674PIXKik1ZkiGHcXHMBW
Never connect nodes of a highway  to a building. Just connect the nodes of the highway next to the building. Navigation systems cannot coop with making a route through a building  :-)

Please look to the width of a road when you tag a trace
The prediction of RapiD is often very poor
If you want to know the width of a highway:
 
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.
<2 mtr  tag as path. over 2 mtr in rural areas as unclassified highway when that road leads to dwellings, settlements etc.
paths/.roads leading to farmland or inhabited areas should not be mapped

Just review the guidelines on the Slack channel
Best regards
southglos (2020-05-07 12:34:55+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If I may offer some pointers:

shop=doors means it's a shop selling doors.  You might want the entrance tag instead: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance

If it's an entrance you're marking, it ought to be a node joined to the edge of the building, not floating around near the building.

You've a typo in the name - "Enterance".  But if this is the entrance for Painswick Inn Housing, and Painswick Inn Housing isn't named anywhere else, I'd be inclined to drop the "entrance" from the name anyway.

If you need help fixing any of this, let me know and I'll be happy to assist.

Happy mapping!

Paul.
DP24PH (2020-05-07 13:53:32+00:00): Change logs:
1. Standardisation of the 'highway=trunk' tag, regardless of its use
2. Fixes around Ayala Malls Vertis North, including lane management
3. Slip lanes for entry/exit from/to PH-1/AH26/C-4/EDSA and Vertis North, and its associated parallel roadway is treated as residential roadway
4. Buildings within The Skysuites Tower has been calibrated into proper alignment
5. Footbridges are hereby calibrated into straight-line alignment
6. Eco-friendly decorative items (tree rows) is included in some areas
Frans S (2020-05-09 12:48:54+00:00): Hello. I was reviewing  your changeset and noticed that you and another mapper mapped the same highways. This can be caused by the fact that a tasks has been closed ( so, free for another mapper) and after that uploading your work. The other mapper could not see the other mappers work since it was not uploaded yet , started mapping and duplicated the mappings without knowing that. Please upload first before closing the task
please do not use the tag 'road' . It's to generic. Use in rural areas path or unclassified. Tracks are not needed to map since they lead just to farmland , woord or riverside.
You have seen the documents pinned on slack, how and what to map?
best regards
GerdP (2021-05-24 09:20:39+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier den Kreisel von roundabout auf circular geändert. Aus meiner Sicht richtig. Warum aber nicht auch den Radweg?
Romwriter (2021-05-24 12:40:04+00:00): Hallo GerdP, das ist schon eine Weile her, deswegen kann ich Dir nicht mehr sagen, was ich mir dabei gedacht habe. Vermutlich habe ich nur die Wege geändert, die vorher mit dem "note"-Tag gekennzeichnet waren, und den Radweg schlicht übersehen.
GerdP (2021-05-24 12:45:00+00:00): Ich bin da noch nie mit dem Rad gefahren, aber ich denke, dass auch die Radler keine Vorfahrt haben und damit junction=roundabout falsch sein dürfte. Bin mir allerdings nicht klar, ob man das besser ganz löscht oder durch junction=circular ersetzt. Wahrscheinlich bessser letzteres?
Romwriter (2021-05-24 12:57:21+00:00): Der Radverkehr muss der Straßenbahn genauso Vorrang gewähren wie der Verkehr auf der Fahrbahn auch. Das spricht für junction=circular, ja. Änderst Du das?
GerdP (2021-05-24 12:58:47+00:00): Ja, mach ich.
GerdP (2021-05-24 13:07:31+00:00): siehe https://www.osm.org/changeset/105228662
Romwriter (2021-05-24 14:41:50+00:00): Danke!
user_5359 (2020-05-07 13:10:04+00:00): Hello! You use sometimes the misspelled key buiding instead building. If you correct this please delete the misspelled key also. To find this key please use https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tto
Florimondable (2020-05-07 21:30:46+00:00): Salut, je vois que tu as ajouté une piste devant Dior (juste avant le pont) est-ce une nouvelle piste temporaire, comment est-elle liée à la nouvelle piste du pont ?
Tnutkk (2020-05-08 06:33:31+00:00): Salut,
Oui un petit morceau de piste cyclable bi-directionnelle (définitive, je précise, rien à voir avec les aménagements temporaires de l'avenue) a été ouvert il y a quelque semaine sur cette toute petite portion. Il manque encore le raccord au pont de Neuilly qui n'est pas terminé donc je ne l'ai pas représenté, c'est pour cela.
Florimondable (2020-05-08 09:43:43+00:00): Ok, on m'a montré des photos d'hier soir, je comprend mieux, merci.
bxl-forever (2020-10-17 19:49:13+00:00): Hello,
Same as the one around the corner?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2505417289
Emilie Ouvrard (2020-10-18 13:00:09+00:00): It is the same. We moved from rue du pont neuf to rue de laeken.
bxl-forever (2020-10-18 15:59:22+00:00): Very good, thanks, and congrats for the move.
I closed the old location and imported its data—website, opening hours, contact details—onto the new one.  If anything is no longer relevant, feel free to edit it.
eggie (2020-05-07 13:36:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review: Probeer als het even kan op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. 
Ik heb het aangepast.
MVG,
Eggie
Freekho (2020-05-07 14:36:09+00:00): Dank, Eggie! Ik zal de tips doornemen. Ik geloof dat OsmAnd niet de meest geschikte tool is om aanvullingen mee te doen.
Freek
eggie (2020-05-07 15:57:14+00:00): Klopt...  een controle met een reguliere editor is altijd aan te raden.
Dat kan met iD  of nog beter JOSM.
MVG,
Eggie
~Jhellico (2020-05-07 23:06:14+00:00): Це ремонт вже закінчився?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84832419
andygol (2020-05-10 14:07:42+00:00): Схоже що ремонт ще не закінчено https://kr.ukravtodor.gov.ua/press/news/uvaha_zakryttia_rukhu_transportu_cherez_provedennia_remontnykh_robit_na_mostu.html
https://kr.ukravtodor.gov.ua/press/news/vidsohodni_na_shliakhoprovodi_bilia_stantsii_kanatove_rozpochalysia_remontni_roboty_rukh_transportu_perekryto.html
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84832419
Britzz (2020-05-08 15:32:49+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : il manque une clé principale pour indiquer de quoi il s'agit, si c'est un relais de télécommunication, il vous faut ajouter :
man_made=communications_tower
cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower

Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84832428
*abq* (2020-12-13 18:07:20+00:00): Der Wasserfallsteig ist nun ebenfalls repariert und als Relation angelegt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12014103
David Crochet (2020-05-07 17:09:40+00:00): Bonjour. Merci pour votre première contribution. N'hésiter pas à continuez, c'est comme cela que la carte progressera.
ma-rt-in (2020-05-08 18:20:13+00:00): Hallo,
wo für braucht diese Straße den Tag bus=yes? bitte nicht tags setzten, die a) nicht nötig sind und b) nicht vor Ort beschildert sind.
vg