piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Truchin (2020-02-18 12:41:03+00:00): Ave
Je suis opposé à cette modification dans le sens ou la "voie" n'a pas la morphologie d'une voie.  Si on suivait ton raisonnement jusqu'au bout, il faudrait également modifier la quasi totalité des way du jardin Tino Rossi.
Thomas
Florimondable (2020-02-18 19:36:01+00:00): Salut,

les chemins n'ont pas la morphologie d'un chemin non plus.
Qu'avons nous ?
Un espace essentiellement piéton (quelques véhicules de services peuvent passer) assez large pour laisser passer un véhicule voir deux, et qui a un cheminement. Donc pour moi ce n'est pas un chemin (footway/path) car trop large pour n'être que cela, les véhicules passent aisément. Est-ce une voie de service ? non plus c'est en premier lieu piéton. Donc c'est un pedestrian et ça correspond à la définition du wiki «A highway=pedestrian is a road or an area mainly or exclusively for pedestrians in which some vehicle traffic may be authorized ».
Par exemple là, à gauche on a un pedestrian, au milieu et à droite un path, et ça permet de bien distinguer là où est censé passer un véhicule.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.84680820005076&lng=2.362035099953573&z=17&pKey=84l12suUwkbI09Q7479sQQ&focus=photo&x=0.40246225099627975&y=0.7082182591881708&zoom=0
xogalla (2020-02-14 18:50:48+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Data_Fusion_To_Update your commercial account? Please disclose any mechanical edits.
DannyMcD (2020-02-14 20:36:30+00:00): The purpose of this changeset was to fix the buildings within buildings in Data_Fusion_To_Update's edits.  I also removed the addr:province tag, following local custom.  The source is more imagery than knowledge.
DannyMcD (2020-02-14 20:51:39+00:00): I've contacted Data_Fusion_To_Update to raise my concerns - see the changeset here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81025364.

By the way, how did you come across this changeset?  I'm always interested in validation tools that I can use to detect buggy changesets.
DannyMcD
tordans (2020-02-15 07:47:36+00:00): Hallo <3xZugIcon>!
Zum Verständnis für mich: Warum hast du dich entschieden auf das – scheinbar – ältere Tagging Schema zu wechseln? Ich lese https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcooling_tower so, dass das bisher angewendete Schema eher das neuere ist.
Viele Grüße, Tobias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81022344
🚂🚂🚂 (2020-02-15 23:22:11+00:00): Hallo Tobias,
ich habe es anders gelernt; dass das neue Schema stark umstritten ist. Von der Häufigkeit sind beide etwa gleich auf.
Viele Grüße
tordans (2020-02-16 07:02:34+00:00): Danke! VG
aixbrick (2020-02-16 10:23:39+00:00): Und was war nun der ausschlaggebende Grund, das Tagging zu ändern, wenn beide etwa gleich häufig genutzt werden?
Gestern Abend ist übrigens aus dem Wiki zu man_made=cooling_tower der Verweis auf das neuere Schema verschwunden:
Von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:man_made%3Dcooling_tower&oldid=1807622 zu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:man_made%3Dcooling_tower&oldid=1958243. Begründung: "no consensus for change".
Hier steht cooling_tower weiterhin als "deprecated": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features.
Und das dt. Wiki zu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tower:type%3Dcooling meldet cooling_tower auch als veraltet.
Und nun?
aixbrick (2020-02-16 10:43:37+00:00): Und noch etwas: "Logistik Campus" ohne Bindestrich war korrekt: https://www.hammer-ac.de/lagerlogistik/logistikzentren/logistik-campus-eschweiler.html.
🚂🚂🚂 (2020-02-17 13:51:01+00:00): Dann eben mit Deppenleerzeichen!
PT-53 (2020-02-17 14:15:08+00:00): Sprichst Du von Leerzeichen für Dich selbst?
user_5359 (2020-02-14 19:15:23+00:00): Please understand and follow: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
viloan (2020-02-14 18:48:54+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abakus_uploader (2020-02-14 23:31:14+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
L'imaginaire (2020-02-22 22:17:57+00:00): No idea where you got that street name from. It's wrong, so I've deleted it. By the way, the address is already on the building, so no need to tag it again on the shop-node that is in the building.
useredf816343045912f6 (2020-02-25 12:46:02+00:00): I found it data on Facebook (the only online presence I could find), and it seemed to align with what I saw. But apparently it's wrong.

Thanks for reviewing this L'imaginaire.
L'imaginaire (2020-02-25 21:06:14+00:00): you're welcome!
letihu (2020-02-16 18:08:02+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!
Dein Einstand erscheint mir nicht glücklich.
Hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772196221/history
und hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772197236/history#map=18/54.24969/9.54460&layers=N
und hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772189561/history#map=18/54.25000/9.54593&layers=N
sind sehr merkwürdige Wege von dir eingetragen worden!
Dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7195163337/history#map=19/54.24971/9.54397&layers=N
ist auch kein Wald.
In diesen Wald
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770854295/history#map=18/54.24932/9.54304&layers=N
hast du noch diesen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770854360/history
Wald gezeichnet.
Auf den Luftbildern ist so etwas nicht zu sehen.
kartler175 (2020-02-16 22:35:53+00:00): Bitte unterlasse solche Phantasiebearbeitungen. Danke!
Guillermo Otalvaro Lagares (2020-06-08 23:14:30+00:00): Por
Guillermo Otalvaro Lagares (2020-06-08 23:16:29+00:00): porque esta informacion no esta incluida. como hago para que esta informacion haga parte de openstreermap?
user_5359 (2022-02-18 06:45:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3466612176. Is the addition future: still correct?
maraf24 (2020-03-01 11:44:29+00:00): "dodanie operatora"
user_5359 (2020-02-15 04:33:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark building as area=yes. Please use building=yes. Also don't forget to add a tag amenity=place_of_worship.
DaveF (2020-02-16 01:06:45+00:00): Hi
You've deleted JQ railway=station node. Please reinstate.
skifans (2020-02-16 21:04:32+00:00): Sorry, think I've fixed it. Not sure why that happened.
maraf24 (2020-02-14 23:52:32+00:00): Wycofane.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-02-15 12:53:49+00:00): Hallo Lenzen100,

bei width bitte die Dezimalstelle mit Punkt statt Komma trennen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772529734

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:width

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
DannyMcD (2020-02-14 20:48:33+00:00): Hi Data_Fusion_To_Update,
Thanks for adding the addresses for Staples stores - that is very helpful.
For the polygons, could you not add the building tag in cases like this one (where the Staples is in a building with other shops).  Having a building inside another building is something that is generally avoided in OpenStreetMap.
DannyMcD
Data_Fusion_To_Update (2020-02-14 21:07:11+00:00): Hey DannyMcD,

Thanks for the tip. What is the preferred way for us to map the boundaries of the Staples within the building? Is there a different tag we should be using instead?

Thanks!
DannyMcD (2020-02-14 21:18:42+00:00): I sometimes use indoor=room (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:indoor%3Droom).  Not having any other tags (other than the store tags) is also OK.
Data_Fusion_To_Update (2020-03-04 21:07:01+00:00): Hey DannyMcD, 

Thanks for your inputs; I did try to use those but somebody went ahead and removed those as well. I was wondering if there is a (quicker) way to mass-update the polygons based on single point co-ordinates? 
Any suggestions from your end would be helpful; to ensure that I don't violate any guidelines.. Thanks once again!
DannyMcD (2020-03-06 00:02:35+00:00): I'm not completely sure what you mean.  It is possible to write scripts in JOSM to mass-update features, but the learning curve is rather steep.  Also, some editors don't like those sort of edits.
Владимир К (2020-06-18 04:54:46+00:00): Hello!
why did you delete named street? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768752666/history
I think it's important for addresses around
TrueWeast (2020-06-23 00:03:34+00:00): Hello, Владимир! Thanks for reaching out. My edits here were primarily addressing validation warnings. In this location, there were multiple highways which were not connected to the greater network, and this was one of them. Based on its condition compared to the nearby residential highways, I must have mistaken it for a long driveway and accidentally deleted it. I have added the way back.
user_5359 (2020-02-18 16:59:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
iriman (2020-02-15 15:08:35+00:00): سلام
کمربندی شمالی اراک آزادراه نیست. حتی نسبت به بزرگراهی که از اون منشعب شده هم به نظرم درجه‌اش کمتره. حتی بخش عمده‌ای از راه هنوز دوطرفه است. این جاده قراره در آینده بخشی از یک آزادراه باشه اما در حال حاضر آزادراه نیست و به نظرم همون درجه قبلی مناسبتره.
https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1396/09/07/1586312/
iriman (2020-02-15 15:14:39+00:00): لینک خبر اشتباهی دادم
این یکی رو ببینید
https://www.irna.ir/news/83544857

«کنارگذر شمالی اراک از جاده‌های ۲ طرفه حادثه خیز است که مسافران جنوب و غرب کشور از این مسیر تردد می‌کنند»
iriman (2020-02-15 15:46:14+00:00): به 
primary
اصلاح کردم
monotar (2021-09-08 22:58:37+00:00): richtigen Mist mal wieder gemappt. Für Fahrradfahrer kein Übergang von Meißner Straße auf Hamburger Straße. Aber alles umändern müssen, klasse!
vrifox (2021-09-09 17:01:17+00:00): Hallo, 
an dieser Stelle sind tatsächlich nur freigegebene Fußwege und die sind auch eingetragen. Allerdings finde ich Ihren Einwand bzgl. der großflächigen Veränderung nachvollziehbar – derlei Dinge mache ich eigentlich mittlerweile nicht mehr.
david harnanda (2021-02-03 12:16:04+00:00): ini lokasii saya yang benar
Jarek 🚲 (2020-02-27 03:54:59+00:00): Just wanted to say thank you for drawing so many of the landuses in the GTA - they really help the main carto map at outer zooms.
DannyMcD (2020-02-27 21:39:42+00:00): Thanks Jarek.  I have been impressed by your central Toronto surveys - they are very detailed.
kucai (2020-07-29 11:30:10+00:00): way 604548360
Why does the destination:ref:to points to a motorway more that is almost 30km further out?
Is this info useful?
CENTRALHUB (2020-02-19 00:45:17+00:00): Please map carefully and precisely. Thanks.
GeoJess (2020-06-05 20:59:59+00:00): Good day wolfgang8741,

I noticed that you digitized a new water relation within an existing water relation 10165450 for Dog Lake. I was wondering if this was intentional? Or if this is the proper convention of tagging this water body. 

Thanks,
Jesspher
wolfgang8741 (2020-06-05 23:25:42+00:00): Hi Jesspher,
Thanks for asking. I only linked the water since the GNIS entry which I imported to Wikidata only refers to the water itself as it is class lake of named places as I've applied to most lakes in Michigan now. The wetland which appears to be mistagged as water and I've corrected to wetland does not appear in the GNIS database under the Swamp label thus would have a different Wikidata entry and GNIS ID. The wetland name is not verifiable based on information presented so I've removed the Dog Lake name from that multipolygon. The two shapes are not in a combined multipoloygon or relation thus should be treated separately.
I hope this clarified the issue and thanks for catching this oversight. :)
Cheers,
Jonathan
Glassman (2020-02-15 00:03:04+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81028115
aharvey (2020-02-16 07:09:20+00:00): hi, the number is the http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref for the bus stop, not the name, the name is usually the street name etc.
calcium990 (2020-02-16 07:21:49+00:00): Thanks for the tip! I was using the StreetComplete app on Android to fill them in, and it just asks for a name so I put this in. I'll tidy up the ones I've done by moving the number into the ref tag, but StreetComplete might start asking for a name again.
aharvey (2020-02-16 07:36:54+00:00): At some point we'll do an import using TfNSW data, but we're not there yet. If there is a printed timetable it usually has the bus stop name at the top.
calcium990 (2020-02-16 07:43:53+00:00): Ahh okay, I'll put those in from now on, thanks. A novice question you might be able to help with: the LPI NSW imagery is of a higher quality than other sources, but it seems like a lot of building polygons are misaligned according to it. Is moving the polygons to match the LPI NSW imagery acceptable, or is there some nuance here I'm missing?
aharvey (2020-02-16 08:10:44+00:00): So generally the LPI NSW Imagery is created to a higher positional accuracy than other satellite sources, so it's usually best, however nothing is perfect and it will shift between imagery updates so generally if it's a long way off feel free to improve, but if it's close I wouldn't normally bother.

Since OSM doesn't support a dynamic datum and since the whole continent is moving, every day the coordinates entered in OSM are slowly drifting away from reality about 1m every 10 years so
RodrigoVi (2020-02-18 10:58:56+00:00): Bonjour. Dans bonnes prqtiaues il est dit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Garder_l.27historique
Bien vous créé way autour pour college, vous amélioré osm par contre Vous supprimer noeud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/921192211 pour mettre tags. Dommage historique perdu pour osm.
cordiqlement
streckenkundler (2020-02-15 10:13:10+00:00): Hei,
kleiner Tip zu den Mautsäulen...

diese müssen in eine Relation. Soweit ich mich damit mal beschäftigt habe, ist es wie diese hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8449590

korrekt...
Gruß, Sven
streckenkundler (2020-02-15 10:13:52+00:00): Hei,
kleiner Tip zu den Mautsäulen...

diese müssen in eine Relation. Soweit ich mich damit mal beschäftigt habe, ist es wie diese hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8449590

korrekt...
Gruß, Sven
streckenkundler (2020-02-15 10:14:23+00:00): Ach ja, vergessen: Wiki dazu:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement

Sven
PT-53 (2020-10-18 07:40:19+00:00): Hallo tobim91,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an diesem Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743728551/history
u.a. Öffnungszeiten ergänzt.
Wenn das Gebäude zwischenzeitlich fertiggestellt ist, sollte noch das Merkmal
construction=house
gelöscht werden.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
tobim91 (2020-10-19 11:15:05+00:00): ist geändert
VeemonZ2 (2020-02-15 00:35:38+00:00): Un favor, cuando agregues cosas como campos de arena, bosques y cuerpos de agua no juntes los nodos (puntos) con carreteras, se hace muy complicado arreglar fallos en el dibujo, tomate tu tiempo y no dibujes por dibujar. Segundo, ya que Ica esta en un crecimiento muy rápido, no utilices ESRi o Bing como fuente exacta de mapeado, te sugiero abrir una pestaña con google maps para verificar el area. Y por último, no elimines áreas, vías y puntos si no estas 100% seguro del cambio, recuerda que otros usuarios también hacen cambios que toman su tiempo. Como consejo final, el streetview de google en Ica es del 2013, de ese año al 2020 muchísimas cosas han cambiado en la ciudad y ya no es una fuente fiable.
user_5359 (2020-02-15 04:19:28+00:00): Please understand and follow: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
Duja (2020-02-27 22:00:50+00:00): Nešto si zajebao ovde, bojim se, ali mi je teško da dokučim šta. Relacije okruga su ostale otvorene. Pogledaj na http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=20.54&lat=44.51&zoom=8
Branko Kokanovic (2020-02-28 07:27:56+00:00): Mislis na https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2959529 ? Vrlo moguce, pravim sranja svuda trenutno:) Svaki dan uzmem i prodjem JOSM validatorima da vidim da je sve zatvoreno, da nema preklapanja, pogledacu i ovo ovih dana (mada nije jos sve zavrseno, treba pogledati ovaj geofabrik tool, zgodan je, na kraju)! Javljam kad ispravim (ako provalim sta:)
Branko Kokanovic (2020-02-28 07:44:36+00:00): Provalio sam sta je. Prvo, ja sve provere koje radim radim sa JOSM podacima koje skinem sa ["boundary"="administrative"], a ovaj je bio "boundary"="census", pa ga nikad nisam ni video. Sad cu da ukljucim sve "boundary". Drugo, falila su dva mala putica, bukvalno su bila spona izmedju gap-ova, Evo sad bi trebalo sve da je tu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81578628

Dobar ti ovaj geofabrik tool, moram jos jednom da kazem:)
user_5359 (2020-02-15 04:12:46+00:00): Please understand and follow: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
abakus_uploader (2020-02-15 23:30:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2020-02-15 04:17:30+00:00): Please understand and follow: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-15 15:51:41+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81046709
ftrebien (2020-03-01 11:27:08+00:00): Olá AntMadeira. Legal as atualizações e novos dados que você colocou na praça. Tem três detalhes que acho que estavam melhor antes: (1) não sobreponha bordas dos polígonos e linhas de vias (ex.: http://openstreetmap.org/way/772557203), (2) conecte as projeções das vias de pedestres às vias principais para permitir o roteamento de pedestres adequado (ex.: esta rota costumava ser calculada corretamente atravessando a praça: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=-30.04385%2C-51.21935%3B-30.04434%2C-51.22011), e (3) a calçada da praça já estava representada pelas etiquetas sidewalk=* nas ruas ao redor, então não precisava ser representada novamente e, de fato, do ponto de vista lógico, agora está representada em duplicidade de formas diferentes. O editor que você está usando (iD) não mostra as calçadas mapeadas com a etiqueta sidewalk=*, o JOSM tem uma visualização pra isso, o que ajuda a evitar essa duplicidade. O artigo em português sobre calçadas não está tão completo quanto o artigo em inglês (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks) que cita falta de consenso sobre a metodologia mais adequada, mas o fato é que não há grande consenso sobre o mapeamento de calçadas como linha separada da via principal, e há desvantagens significativas para a manutenção do mapa (como as complicações dos pontos #1 e #2 e um número maior de elementos geométricos), geocodificação (número maior de elementos se o nome da rua for aplicado também à calçada) e renderização (poluição do desenho). Como mesmo no Brasil quase todas as ruas, e especialmente as praças, possuem calçada ou área reservada para sua construção futura, não se ganha muito representando elas como linhas separadas. Lá por 2013 eu mapeei algumas calçadas dessa mesma forma, como linhas separadas da via, e em pouco tempo o mapa ficou caótico e difícil de manter e usar, e acabei voltando atrás. Com a etiqueta sidewalk=*, que você pode combinar com sidewalk:surface=* para indicar o material da calçada, o mapeamento é bem mais rápido e em ~98% dos casos contempla todas as necessidades. Nos 2% restantes eu costumo dividir como você fez, especialmente em entroncamentos complicados / diferentes do básico.