piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:29:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127172171
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:26:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
See point 9 in attached document how to map tall buildings


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127172192
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:21:28+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127172218
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:20:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127172231
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:17:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127172504
jpennycook (2023-05-21 12:07:26+00:00): Hi!

You have changed the value of maxspeed on many roads in Shalden. Can I ask what your source was?
There are no speed limit signs in Shalden, so the national speed limit applies to the public highways. The value of maxspeed should be the official/legal/signposted speed limit rather than a desired value. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed

Jon
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 21:11:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 126194484, 126194567, 126195459, 126195735, 126196064, 126313116, 126313143, 126313185, 126313560, 126742024, 127067207, 127067240, 127067315, 127067362, 127067418, 127067579, 127067738, 127161717, 127161738.
Frans S (2022-10-08 08:24:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. I reviewed a number of tasks and will comment on each changeset which shows issues.
Please pay attention to next points:|
In general. 
* The shadow of a building included in your mapping.
On this changeset. The big building is not accurate drawn and include to much tree.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127173075
eggie (2022-10-07 21:47:07+00:00): Beste 4LM

 Het is niet correct om adressen te gaan toevoegen aan schuurtjes. Adressen zijn uniek in OSM. De adresnodes staan op de woningen.
MVG
eggie
4LM3R (2022-10-07 21:54:00+00:00): Oke, ik zal het onthouden. Ik heb aan meerdere schuurtjes adressen toegevoegd. Ik zal kijken of ik deze kan verwijderen
eggie (2022-10-07 22:00:55+00:00): Hoi 4LM IK heb het al teruggedraaid middels revert.
No problem.. Gewoon doorgaan met mappen......   In het begin zijn al die regels in OSM rijstebrij.. Je oet het toevallig allemaal weten.  Dus er wordt je niets kwalijk genomen.
Dat bruggetje verwijderen was bv prima. Weer actueel.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-10-07 22:01:22+00:00): reverted by changeset #127174388
eggie (2022-10-07 22:06:58+00:00): Hier zie je wie nog meer met in Kollum
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=14&lat=53.27955905&lon=6.13783915&layers=B0T

De meest ervaren mapper hier is Andrie Wijma. Die zou je ook om hulp kunnen vragen mocht je er niet uitkomen. 
eggie
eggie (2022-10-07 22:07:21+00:00): typo met>mapt
MxxCon (2022-10-09 04:47:28+00:00): Hello.
Is that actually a garden or just grass area or a park? Is "Sunnyside Garden Area" its actual name or just something you came up with?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127173194
Frans S (2022-10-08 10:00:19+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
Tagging of highways:
You tagged highway=residential in a rural area. 
Unclassified, or track (access to agricultural fields) are more appropriate.
 
 African countries:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127173299
Frans S (2022-10-08 08:25:26+00:00): In addition to my previous comment. Your mappings here are a bit oversized.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127173451
Frans S (2022-10-08 08:26:38+00:00): Here are the same issues.
Oversized or included the shadow of the building
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127173528
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:53:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127173600
Snusmumriken (2022-10-08 08:05:12+00:00): Jag tror du tog fel tagg
johantiden (2022-11-07 12:27:11+00:00): Oops! Fixat nu!
eggie (2022-10-07 21:48:57+00:00): Beste 4LM... In het begin wordt meegekeken. Uiteraard ook om te helpen.
Het is niet correct om adressen dubbel te gaan toevoegen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127174056
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-07 21:51:26+00:00): Svp ook geen adressen nogmaals toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrekken.
Het geeft allemaal foutmeldingen hier.

gr eggie
eggie (2022-10-07 21:54:03+00:00): Nog een tip.. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het kadaster.
Sv niet zomaar iets aan veranderen. Je kunt wel een terugmedling doen naar het kadaster. Dan gaat het bij een volgende periodieke import goed.
Een luchtfoto is niet geschikt om gebouwen aan te passen

Dakranden zijn niet bepalend voor de vorm van het gebouw om maaiveldniveau. Niet naar de daken kijken.
eggie (2022-10-07 21:58:31+00:00): reverted by changeset #127174363

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
4LM3R (2022-10-07 22:01:28+00:00): Bedankt voor je tips, ik zal deze fouten niet weer maken! Als ik vragen heb weet ik je te vinden.
-Almer
eggie (2022-10-07 22:17:25+00:00): No problem Almer..  Het zal niet meevallen om fouten te vinden in Kollum, want hier heeft Andries Wijma er een perfecte kaart van gemaakt... 

Maar nog genoeg te doen in Fryslan. :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 23:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127176855 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some satirical vandalism of Kaliningrad
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-08 14:43:00+00:00): If it's owned by Shem's bar, I suggest changing it to be the operator instead of deleting the name.
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:09:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127174527
Frans S (2022-10-08 08:34:49+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You did not square 2 buildings.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127174645
Frans S (2022-10-08 08:41:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. Your mappings are often oversized.
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 

* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127174688
Frans S (2022-10-08 09:17:08+00:00): Hello again.
Please take a look at this picture. 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VB2BIzAP1zN84NSk7cunQvEFobuTLEmx/view?usp=sharing
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127174688
Frans S (2022-10-08 08:31:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127174826
Frans S (2022-10-08 08:32:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped accordingly, despite the blurred imagery.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127174880
Frans S (2022-10-08 08:28:23+00:00): Here, Not always accurate drawn, included the yard into a building band mapped 3 buildings as 1 building.
In general, your mappings are rather fair, but look after my comments.
Best regards.
Please be more accurate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127174887
user_5359 (2022-10-23 16:36:48+00:00): Does this station really only exist in 1972 or until 1972 (in the latter case a minus sign is missing before the year)?
ovruni (2022-10-08 14:48:13+00:00): Hola Quispe Keen, gracias por contribuir a OSM. Los nombres de los objetos deben de agregarse solamente cuando estos tienen un nombre en particular (no name=Tienda) [0]
Las bodegas del barrio son shop=convenience [1]
Los nombres de las direcciones deberían de tener el nombre completo con el prefijo, tal como se encuentran nombradas las calles.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:shop%3Dconvenience
aTarom (2022-10-08 17:02:40+00:00): Hello Carto_Graph, you have considered the value of the key?
"building:level"="-1"
perhaps it's
"building:levels:underground"="1"

Cheers
Carto_Graph (2022-10-22 14:48:53+00:00): I just made an autocorrect of building:level->building:levels in accordance with the requirements:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:level

Did I do something wrong?
Rogoyski (2022-12-17 20:06:09+00:00): Jesteś przywiązany do footway=traffic_island? W większości przypadków mamy w tym miejscu footway=sidewalk. Ten drugi jest np.rozumiany przez StreetComplete i generuje pytania o krawężniki, ten pierwszy nie.
NorthCrab (2022-12-18 09:33:18+00:00): Według dokumentacji lepiej jest dać traffic_island i zgadzam się z tą logiką - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island. Trzeba założyć issue w StreetComplete aby naprawili :P
Rogoyski (2022-12-18 11:21:55+00:00): No właśnie był nawet pull request, ale go odrzucili, bo tag prawie nieużywany :/

https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/pull/3786
NorthCrab (2022-12-18 11:24:32+00:00): No to kwestia popularyzowania go :D Mi jakoś nie przeszkadza używanie tego niżowego tagu w tej sytuacji bo uważam że pasuje.
Rogoyski (2022-12-18 12:45:49+00:00): Ja jestem natomiast zdania, że nie wnosi on nic ponad użycie w tym samym miejscu istniejącego już tagu footway=sidewalk :/
NorthCrab (2022-12-18 12:51:33+00:00): Ja nie zgadzam się aby przejście z footway=sidewalk po środku było równorzędne crossing:island=yes. Bo wtedy z punktu widzenia danych (bez dodatkowego algorytmu) nie ma po drodze żadnych wysepek. Natomiast footway=traffic_island uważam że dobrze odwzorowuje crossing:island=yes (które tak naprawdę zastępuje). Bo na danych widać że jest island. A przy zwykłym sidewalk następuje strata informacji.
NorthCrab (2022-12-18 12:52:39+00:00): I też logicznie nie uważam aby taka mała wysepka na drodze była uznawana za "sidewalk". Bo "side" jest na boku a nie środku drogi ;-P To nie jest to samo i zależy mi na rozróżnianiu tego.
Rogoyski (2022-12-18 14:10:29+00:00): Pierwszy argument jest dobry. Drugi zdecydowanie nie, bo są chodniki pomiędzy dwoma jezdniami jak na Targowej czy Kasprowicza, które raczej nie pełnią funkcji traffic_island.

O ile nie przeszkadza mi sam tag traffic_island i nie zamierzam go zwalczać, o tyle znów mnie piorun uderza, że w tym OSM zamiast całościowo zaprojektować taksonomię pod konkretne przypadki użycia, każdy wrzuca na wiki nowe tagi wedle swojego uznania, a konsumenci i autorzy narzędzi niech się martwią :/
Rogoyski (2022-12-18 14:11:32+00:00): *nie będę go zwalczał na mapie, póki jest na wiki
abakus_uploader (2022-10-08 22:32:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 23:39:57+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 127063463, 127063780, 127088330, 127174078, 127174272, 127174318, 127174419.
Binnette (2022-10-08 06:06:26+00:00): Hi again Grace. Here is my first comment. It seems that in this chamgeset you edited features in 2 differents countries (France and Congo). Usually we try to avoid that. Next time just "save"/"send your edits" before changing the country you edit in iD editor. Oh and I from France since I am french. Have a nice day.
Frans S (2022-11-02 13:28:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127176970
Binnette (2022-10-08 06:01:08+00:00): Hi Grace. Welcome to OSM. Thank for your edit. Is Apollo Games a hostel or a guest house? Because you mixed both features. Plus guest_house=house seems not to be a good value. Please read article https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:guest%20house?uselang=en and fix the attributes. Have a nice day.
seewäldler (2023-04-16 15:42:28+00:00): Hallo barefootstache!

von dieser Straße ist noch gar nichts zu sehen und so wird es wohl vor einem halben Jahr auch schon gewesen sein. Da wäre doch sicher 'proposed' die richtige Bezeichnung. Schaust du dir das noch mal an?
seewäldler (2023-06-04 11:42:20+00:00): Hallo barefootstache!

hast du mal Zeit dir das anzuschauen?
barefootstache (2023-06-04 12:05:59+00:00): Sers seewälder, bis jetzt gibt es keine Änderungen und stimme dazu das 'proposed' eher besser ist.
flohoff (2023-03-14 16:10:35+00:00): Moin,
ich bin auf die ganzen barrier=kerb gestoßen weil die gerade durch StreetComplete leute nachbearbeitet werden.

barrier=kerb heisst eigentlich das man da nicht mit dem fahrrad durch kann weil eine Stufe da ist (Ebensowenig mit dem Rollstuhl). D.h. die barrier=kerb sind hier nur von Fußgängern Nutzbar.

Das kommt mir doch sehr komisch vor das querungshilfen nur durch Fußgänger nutzbar sein sollen aber nicht durch Rollstuhlfahrer oder Fahrräder.

Flo
user_11609320 (2022-10-08 00:42:56+00:00): if you disagree, can you let me know why, so I don't make the same mistake again?
DP24PH (2022-10-08 01:46:25+00:00): Thank you very much for updating our Mapillary ID from v3 to v4, and upon checking, no issues were found.

Note: Begin #WashingtonPlacePH x #MapillaryUpdate


DP24
Svalbard (2022-10-08 04:05:15+00:00): Hallo puma515, bist Du sicher, dass auch der Hauptweg durch die Anlage „access=private“ ist? Der Weg ist Teil einer Radroute. Er würde m. E. und nach Verständnis des Wiki zum Tagging „access=private“ von Routing- und Navigationsanwendungen gemieden werden. Das wäre dann irgendwie kontraproduktiv und würde eine Unterbrechung der ausgeschilderten Radroute bedeuten. Vielleicht verläuft die Radroute ja aber auch nicht mehr über die Anlage. Das hast Du evtl. vor Ort überprüft, bevor Du das Tagging für diesen Weg auch schon vor einiger Zeit geändert hast. Dann müsste allerdings auch der Streckenverlauf angepasst werden. Gruß Svalbard