piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Supaplex (2022-10-03 10:55:15+00:00): 你好，

OpenStreetMap為不少網站如Facebook,仰賴的圖資，如需測試請至測試站，這邊請加添真實存在的事物。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126925682
Supaplex (2022-10-03 10:55:18+00:00): 你好，

OpenStreetMap為不少網站如Facebook,仰賴的圖資，如需測試請至測試站，這邊請加添真實存在的事物。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126925682
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Tjuro (2022-10-04 08:12:32+00:00): hello,

dont put the name on the pier use 
leisure=marina

like this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295356909

and only map the center/main of the pier that looks better
jidanni (2022-10-08 06:29:18+00:00): Thanks. Tonight I think I'm digging myself into a deeper and deeper hole. Maybe I should quit while I'm ahead.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SUPER HEROS 67 (2022-10-03 17:43:16+00:00): Bonjour Kazer67,

Je te remercie pour tes modifications.

Rien à signaler, mise a par des angles droits sur des chemins ou route que j’ai corrigé.

Je t’invite à participer a la rencontre OpenStreetMap en Alsace et pouvoir discuter avec les contributeurs et contributrices il y a prévue le 19 octobre 2022 de 18h à 20h une rencontre sur Sélestat.

Pour consulter l’événement : https://osmcal.org/event/1628/

Si tu souhaites discuter avec les contributrices et contributeurs d’OpenStreetMap en Alsace je t’invite à rejoindre le groupe telegram via le lien suivant : https://t.me/OSM_Alsace

Bonne journée

SUPER HEROS 67
Kazer67 (2022-10-03 20:01:58+00:00): Bonjour,

Les photos satellites ne sont plus à jour (les travaux ont été fini il y a un mois).

Les angles droits sont du faits que toutes la zone a été réaménagé et la route pour les voitures fait un angle à 90° légèrement arrondie pour suivre l'angle de braquage d'une voiture (la sortie n'est d'ailleurs plus possible en bas du pont car un trottoir a été mis en place. La sortie ce situe maintenant plusieurs mètres après le pont pour des raisons de sécurité).

Une barrière pour les vélos a aussi été installé et la moitié du chemin de la Digue n'est plus accessible en voiture.

Cordialement
Kaz.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
izolight (2022-10-03 10:15:33+00:00): I don't think there is a need to use relations for these landuses as they are actually closed ways. While doing it with ways creates some duplication I think that outweighs the complexity, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Mapping_style,_best_practice
Frans S (2022-10-13 11:51:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126926883
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
archie (2022-10-03 10:11:53+00:00): Vill du ha vänligheten att svara på kommentarer:   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120457527#map=19/59.04883/12.68682, och    https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120453016
tastrax (2022-10-10 11:24:24+00:00): I have corrected Murray Street where there is no physical separation between lanes (See Mapillary). I also corrected the lane counts.
VLD165 (2022-10-19 17:07:13+00:00): “Hello Adamant1, 
Your actions in changeset #126927595 removed several relations. I will be reverting this changeset. Feels free to modify the imagery of badly mapped areas without deletions in the future. Thanks”
Adamant1 (2022-10-19 17:16:30+00:00): I removed the relations because they were inaccurately mapped and don't match what's on the ground. People are allowed to delete things in such instances. It's impossible to just modify the areas in this case because of nature of the water and the fact that the area had hundreds of micro-mapped nodes. Really, it shouldn't have been mapped as a water area in the first place. Since there's zero way to do it accurately. Especially since the Smith River is mostly dry for a lot of the year. Obviously it's incorrect to map a mostly dry area of scree as a currently exiting, large body of water. So I'd appreciate it if you left things how I edited them. Otherwise, I will just delete the areas again. Thanks.
Adamant1 (2022-10-19 17:17:01+00:00): *nature of the river
VLD165 (2022-10-19 19:18:36+00:00): Hi Adamant1,
Perhaps there are other fixes we could explore, like adding seasonal/intermittent tags to several parts of Smith River. Do you have specific coordinates supported by ground truth where the seasonal/intermittent tags can be added?
Adamant1 (2022-10-19 19:57:22+00:00): Adding seasonal/intermittent tags to it wouldn't be adequate because the area would still be grossly inaccurate even if it was tagged as intermittent. You can't have a water body that goes over parts of a forest when that's clearly not where the water course goes for instance 
 and just deal with that inconsistency by tagging it as being sessional. 

If you haven't done so, I really suggest you look at how it's mapped versus the area of the actual river in whatever editor your using. It's not just slightly off. It's flagrantly inaccurate to the point of being completely worthless. That goes for the whole thing to. There isn't a specific coordinates that are grossly off. The whole thing is and adding seasonal/intermittent tags aren't going to do anything to fix it. Otherwise, I would have just added them in the first place. 

There's really only one way to deal with it. By deleting the area and re-mapping the whole thing. Which is something I had planned to do at some point either as scree or intermitted water body areas where it would be appropriate, but that would be impossible for me to unless the grossly inaccurate water bodies are deleted first. I'm obviously not going to re-map the whole thing over the bad data.
SomeoneElse (2022-11-05 15:48:59+00:00): @VLD165  Looking at the area around                                                                 
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1022949816/history :                                                
 
 The water area is an nmixter import (on which any QA was likely very limited or non-existant)

Given that, if you want to add the water area in properly, starting from that import doesn't really help, because water moves around.

Essentially, I think that Asamant1 was correct to delete it.  If you want to see a wider view on what people think about these imports have a look through talk-us or Slack convesations of the years.

I'm sure that everyone would be grateful if you (and FB) could commit time to mapping it properly - looking at recent imagery, figuring out which bits are likely to be intermittent and which not, and also mapping any post-imagery changes (likely to be tricky as I suspect that quite a lot of this area isn't very accessible)

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Frans S (2022-10-03 10:13:31+00:00): Hello. 
A remark. The objects you mapped here (f.i. in the centre)  are no buildings . When you take a close look, you will see a small round area (yard?) surrounded by a wall.
Can you fix it ?
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126927679
NieWnen (2022-10-08 13:01:29+00:00): Zostały drzewa na budynkach oraz ścieżka przecina się z budynkami. 

Trzeba to poprawić.
Frans S (2022-10-09 11:05:30+00:00): See my comment on changeset 127222563 about
connecting nodes to each other
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126928079
Littlebtc (2022-10-03 10:21:06+00:00): This partially reverts https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126928233 as the highway is still planning.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Emilius123 (2022-10-15 17:55:26+00:00): Du hast ja an sich recht, wobei du ein access=no vergessen hast, da der Fahrweg derzeit noch gesperrt ist.
Emilius123 (2022-10-15 17:56:39+00:00): Ist aber auch egal, macht Montag ja auf
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-10-03 10:49:34+00:00): Hi Winschu..

Please use the English format for opening_hours=  ..........

You may use this tool  
openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 
 
Grüss
eggie
eggie (2022-10-03 11:19:15+00:00): fixed Samstag...  Bitte ergänzen mit dem OSM format.
gr eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Piskvor (2022-10-03 11:27:52+00:00): Ahoj, zablokovaný čím? Nedá se ani projít nebo projet na kole? (Viz třeba tohle na Ladronce: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4000856525 )

A tím pádem je zrušený i to zjednosměrnění od Ladronky?

Díky za upřesnění.
Piskvor (2022-10-03 11:32:16+00:00): Jo aha, betonovým blokem v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126928090 . V tom případě nebylo nutný mazat tenhle kousek, pokud tam cesta pořád je, jen není průjezdná autem.

Upraveno v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126931960
ivanbranco (2022-11-04 10:50:46+00:00): Ciao Emme9720,

per convenzione su OSM usiamo l'inglese britannico, quindi surface=asfalto non va bene, bisogna usare surface=asphalt
Aluminum0173 (2022-11-04 10:58:13+00:00): Ciao!
Io ho sempre usato le modifiche "rapide", quindi aggiunto la strada e appare il materiale e metto asfalto, tutto in italiano, però direttamente dall'editor ID di osm.
Adesso non ricordo se magari avevo fatto qualcosa di strano allora dato che era mi sembra la mia prima modifica.
Ora comunque uso direttamente l'editor o ancora meglio e quasi sempre street complete.
Grazie mille.
Msiipola (2022-10-03 10:30:06+00:00): Test av kommentarer
riiga (2022-10-03 13:19:33+00:00): Test
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-09 11:03:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
Open this webpage to see what I mean
https://drive.google.com/file/d/14ALReC-7rWRoYm7kyo6TN8A3RpMU1L0d/view?usp=sharing



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126929085
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
georift (2022-10-03 12:59:45+00:00): Hey there, welcome to OSM! The satellite images don't yet show this building. Is it a new construction?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126929116
Scout Jens (2022-11-30 13:52:59+00:00): Hallo mapper999, ich fuchse mich so langsam rein ins mappen. Du hast ja schon ewig Erfahrung! Straßenseitiges Parken kenne ich aber anders: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Viele Grüße, Jens
mapper999 (2022-11-30 15:57:50+00:00): Hallo Jens,
sorry, aber ich verstehe nicht, was du meinst? Was hätte ich anders machen sollen? Der Sinn von diesem Edit war ja gerade das generische parking=surface auf das neuere parking=street_side zu ändern.
Scout Jens (2022-11-30 16:14:06+00:00): Ich meine, dass die Parkplätze an der Straße als Stellplätze markiert sind. Diese sind die eigentlichen streetside Parkplätze. Darüber gibt es dann noch einmal einen streetside Parkplatz. Der ist nicht notwendig, da streetside Parking in der Straße vermerkt wird: Werden Parkbuchten separat erfasst, sollten nach Möglichkeit weitere Informationen ergänzt werden:
parking:lane:<side>=separate sollte an der Straßenlinie hinzugefügt werden. 
Wenn möglich, korrigiere ich Einträge von so alten Hasen wie Dir nicht. Ich wollte einfach mal darauf hinweisen und eventuell verstehe ich da was nicht richtig. Dann bitte melden, bevor ich die ganze Welt falsch mappe ;-)
mapper999 (2022-11-30 16:29:38+00:00): Mhm, also normalerweise nutze ich entweder amenity=parking mit parking=street_side oder parking:lane an der Straße. amenity=parking meistens bei besseren Luftbildern und größeren Parkflächen; parking:lane eher wenn es schnell gehen soll, wenn ich die genaue Geometrie nicht kenne oder bei reinen Parkmarkierungen. amenity=parking_space dann für die tatsächlichen einzelnen Stellflächen, ggf. zusammengefasst wenn keine Markierung dazwischen ist. parking:lane:<side>=separate nutze ich tatsächlich nicht, das wäre aber natürlich noch sinnvoll. Soweit ich es verstanden haben können je nach Situation beide Schemata genutzt werden, nur nicht gleichzeitig. Falls irgendwo Parkplätze von mir doppelt an Straße und als Fläche erfasst sind, dann habe ich vermutlich die Tags an der Straße übersehen.
Und gerade gesehen: An der Tullastraße fehlt sowohl parking:lane als auch amenity=parking, die Parkflächen müsstem nach dem Umbau dort aber sowieso noch angepasst werden.
Scout Jens (2022-11-30 16:47:02+00:00): Ja, so ist es. Darf ich die Parkplätze an der Durlacher Allee vor der Polizei an passen, so wie ich meine und DU schaust drüber? Ich wohne übrigens da ganz in der Nähe.
mapper999 (2022-11-30 16:57:05+00:00): Ja, mach mal :)
Scout Jens (2022-11-30 17:12:07+00:00): Hier mein Vorschlag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129569707
Wulfmorn (2022-10-04 07:42:43+00:00): Denne vil komme tilbake igjen da adressene importeres fra Kartverket. Du bør heller melde adresseendring til folkeregisteret.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-10-03 11:28:09+00:00): Dag Michiel.. De combinatie access=no met foot=yes is bijna altijd fout en wordt ontmoedigd om toe te passen.
Staat hier echt een bord Verboden Toegang.
Ook zul je zien dat de paxden nauwelijks renderen op de kaart. Immers access = no..
MVG
eggie
Michiel van Ginkel (2022-10-03 11:31:04+00:00): oh, dat is gek! Aan die instelling heb ik niets veranderd. Zal even kijken. Het is openbaar toegankelijk gebied :)
Michiel van Ginkel (2022-10-03 11:33:18+00:00): Ik kan in dit geval bij toegang onder 'alles' alleen kiezen voor beperkte toegang. In dit geval is het enkel voetpad. Zal ik er unknown van maken? Er staan namelijk geen borden.