piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mcconner22 (2022-10-24 02:04:25+00:00): I'm not sure if the part of the neighborhood with Berwick and Kirksway Lanes is gated or not (and it might acutally be a separate community that's just connected with a trail). For the moment I'm not marking those roads as private until I have a chance to go over and look.
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
ZeLonewolf (2022-11-13 19:48:45+00:00): Hello,

The Tulsa boundary relation is currently reporting 3 errors in the JOSM validator.  I'd attempt to fix it but I'm pretty sure you have a better handle on this one.
Baloo Uriza (2022-11-13 21:32:21+00:00): Which Tulsa (city or county)?

I would expect both are pretty bad right now, and I've been trying to get it sorted but boundaries in Oklahoma are quite complex.  I've been untangling boundaries as I map other things in the area because it's really the only way to not go insane at this point.
ZeLonewolf (2022-11-13 21:40:32+00:00): The issue I ran into was with the city:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/184985

I have not looked at the county boundary.
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
Langlaeufer (2022-10-24 09:41:31+00:00): Layer ist die Zeichenebene, Level die Etage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127977559
Nadjita (2022-10-24 10:47:32+00:00): Ja, aber dann müsste ich doch eigentlich beides auf 1 haben, aber dann beschwert sich josm, dass ich layer=1 auf einem Weg ohne bridge habe
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127977559
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:24:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
adiatmad (2022-10-24 04:10:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a large building here (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106487887). This page will be useful for editing in OpenStreetMap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide). Happy mapping!
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
AkuAnakTimur (2022-10-24 02:53:59+00:00): + PCL Maps from TXU
felipeeugenio (2022-10-24 11:34:42+00:00): Hola. Con que los tags los tenga el recinto es suficiente. Al agregarlos a los edificios también lo único que haces es duplicar la información (triplicar en este caso).
Otro tema. Con la letra Q puedes dejar los edificios cuadrados.

saludos
felipeeugenio (2022-10-24 11:35:26+00:00): Por favor eso si no escribir en Mayúsculas y no incurrir en contracciones.
Saludos
mavl (2022-10-24 06:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127981019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6479].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:04:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. Та же самая проблема - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127861967
wireguy (2022-10-24 16:43:05+00:00): hi snake, this change broke a wetland relation, relation 3387523.   can you take a look?   looks like the footway is part of the wetland. thx
rhtb0 (2022-10-24 06:33:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
안녕하십니까
의미 있는 변경 집합 댓글(".")을 사용하십시오. 다른 사용자가 당신이 하는 일을 이해하는 데 도움이 되지 않습니다.
rhtb0 (2022-10-24 06:34:31+00:00): 대충이라도 적어주세요
emersonveenstra (2022-11-11 13:42:16+00:00): Hi,

Why did you mark crossings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963070554 as bicycle=designated?
mcconner22 (2022-11-11 14:02:37+00:00): Should it be bicycle=yes rather than designated? It's a marked bike & pedestrian crossing with a signal at that traffic circle. I think I had added bike designated to match the foot designated that was already there. (The overall changeset was to fix paths/crossings that were marked as no bicycles)
emersonveenstra (2022-11-11 15:54:23+00:00): Okay, then designated is correct. Does the sidewalk connected to it have signage for bicycles?
mcconner22 (2023-01-07 23:49:56+00:00): I know I'm very late coming back to this, but I changed it the crossings back to bicycle=yes after taking another look at the signage https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130999452
Pavel Chuchuva (2023-01-23 06:45:36+00:00): It looks like Coleen Street became Borlase Street - are you sure this is correct?
Diana IRM-ED (2022-12-19 04:59:14+00:00): Hi Apaay00
Thank you for your mapping contribution.
This water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106493616) has crossing with the track road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/693014432)
Is the track road still there? please give some suggestion.
thank you
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Supaplex (2022-10-25 03:20:18+00:00): 為何要移除地址相關點？
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127979088
Supaplex (2022-10-25 03:20:19+00:00): 為何要移除地址相關點？
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127979088
Diacritic (2022-10-24 05:41:40+00:00): As discussed many times previously, these turn lanes have been modelled extending far beyond the point of physical separation.

I have changed the geometry to match best practice.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127979346
SomeoneElse (2022-10-24 13:22:50+00:00): Hello Falsernet,
Can you please use more meaningful comments than simply "fixed restrictions"?  Explain what was wrong before, and why and how you changed it.
Best Regards,
Andy
Falsernet (2022-10-24 15:56:59+00:00): A restriction tagged on a node + a nonexistent no-right-turn. Replaced with a no-left-turn and some no-u-turns
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Diacritic (2022-10-24 05:44:19+00:00): Way 1106500183 extends well past the point of physical separation, and even extends past where the carriageways split.

I have adjusted the geometry to meet best practice. I have also adjusted the highway type to be a link road, as it is a slip lane and not a main carriageway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127979775
Supt_of_Printing (2022-10-24 06:12:57+00:00): Okay, I have searched for where these rules are spelt out and cannot find them. Can you give me the link so I can read it for myself?
Diacritic (2022-10-24 06:34:03+00:00): Hi Supt,

In regards to not splitting ways where there is no physical separation, you can refer to both https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway.

Both articles make it clear that physical separation (ie, a barrier) is necessary for determining if a carriageway should be split.

Specific guidance on dual carriageway intersections is documented https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Junctions#Dual_carriageway_intersections.

Before notifying you in your edits, I have also reached out several times to the mailing lists and confirmed my understanding, beginning with:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-September/014968.html

There is documentation about the preferred method of indicating turn lanes, where it is legal to change lanes, etc on the following wiki pages:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change.

I'd encourage you to jump on either the mailing list or the #oceania discord server. There are many people who are extremely passionate mappers, and it lends itself to discussion much better than changeset discussions. :)
user_5359 (2022-10-24 09:44:20+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Danke für das Eintragen von den Fahrrad-Verleih-Möglichkeiten. Kleiner Hinweis: Es gibt einen Unterschied zwischen Namen und Beschreibung! Ich bin mir sicher, dass "RSVG-Bike Fahrradverleih" kein Name ist. Gibt es an den Punkten eine öffentlich sichtbare Nummer, die man eventuell noch unter den Schlüssel ref eintragen könnte (um später schneller einen Abgleich zu ermöglichen)?
HellMap (2022-10-24 10:50:20+00:00): Sveiki!

Vai šie ceļi nav tomēr `highway=residential`, jo pēc aerofoto te ir privātīpašumi un mājas? (Pēc kadastra viens ir iela, otrs is kopīpašuma ceļš)

Un piebrauktuve pie mājas/privātīpašumā noteikti būtu `highway=service`; `service=driveway`.
Anonix35 (2024-01-03 15:58:57+00:00): Are you sure that "Crêtes" is also a path for pedestrian ?
gscholz (2024-01-03 16:09:50+00:00): Hi Anonix35,
I recommend to ask the inventor in this case:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127938057

Guido
Anonix35 (2024-01-03 16:12:59+00:00): Hi Guido,
Oh yes sorry, I didn't see.
tomhukins (2022-10-29 21:22:54+00:00): Hi, it looks like this change fixes my work in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127714789 but you didn't contact me to discuss this.

I really appreciate you improving my work, but if you had left an explanation as a changeset comment then I would have been able to understand the mistakes I made and how I can learn from them.

It's great when large corporations want to improve the map, but please engage with local mappers when doing so.
Vika_Nosovich (2022-10-31 10:07:32+00:00): Hi, tomhukins!
Thank you for your comment. In this case, I slightly tweaked the connection of roads to fix the error on OSM. I agree that I should describe in more detail what I'm correcting or contact the mapper directly for this. 
Best regards, Vika
tomhukins (2022-10-31 10:19:20+00:00): When you say "the error on OSM" what do you mean?  As far as I'm concerned, I mapped this correctly from a survey on the ground, not based on some automated tool or armchair mapping.
Vika_Nosovich (2022-10-31 10:32:37+00:00): I mean the suggestion of OSM ID tool to fix the connection of roads, when roads don't have a common intersection
tomhukins (2022-10-31 10:36:06+00:00): Thank you for explaining.  Why do you believe the roads don't have a common intersection?  Having walked past there recently, I'm fairly sure they do.
Vika_Nosovich (2022-10-31 11:36:24+00:00): This happened due to different mapping tools and I fixed two roads that don't have a common point of either a bridge/tunnel, so I corrected this according to the satellite imagery. You, as a local resident, have more up-to-date data and have the right to correct it as you see fit. It will be more correct.
user_6110846 (2022-10-24 06:58:00+00:00): https://www.volynpost.com/news/210299-u-gromadi-na-volyni-perejmenuvaly-50-vulyc
AkuAnakTimur (2022-10-24 05:47:00+00:00): Comment should have been " added unmapped or amended existing place names"
Jrachi (2022-11-04 10:00:43+00:00): Hai aggiunto dei guidepost usando due nodi sovrapposti e altri già presenti.
Visto che non hai ancora risposto al commento precedente, procedo alla sistemazione io stesso
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
robryk (2026-06-23 21:36:43+00:00): Hallo,

ich vermute, dass du dich hier verirrt habe: so weit ich mich erinnere, diese Ampel haben das Züri-standardmässiges vibrierendes Blindesignal und kein akustiches. Bist du anderer Meinung?

Falls wir einig sind, dass das irrtumlich ist: Ich habe viele solche irrtumlich markierte Ampeln in Zürich gefunden, so wäre es gut solche Fehlern auszuschliessen durch eine Verbesserung in StreetComplete. Deshalb würde ich dankbar, wenn du beschriebst, was dein Denkprozess beim Ausfüllen war und was denkst du würde für dich dabei hilfsreich.

Mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Robert
mottiger (2026-06-25 09:08:03+00:00): Höi

Ich kann mich heute noch mal gezielt darauf achten, ob es tatsächlich nur eine Vibration ist oder ein Geräusch. 

Danke für den Input, ich hoffe ich vergesse es nicht bis am Abend.

Liebe Grüsse
mottiger (2026-07-02 15:28:44+00:00): So, endlich mal dazu gekommen genau hinzuhören. Entweder habe ich halluziniert, bei SC vertippt. Stand heute keinen Sound gehört.
westnordost (2026-07-10 11:00:47+00:00): Super, danke! Und danke für die Korrektur!
literan (2022-10-24 17:04:28+00:00): странный статус получился
augxcgrwxo (2022-10-25 06:07:02+00:00): Ужас какой, сам навандадил. Рельсы только за оградой разобрали, сейчас исправлю
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2022-10-24 06:24:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 127976888, 127976905, 127977134, 127977150, 127977169, 127977192, 127977205, 127977212, 127977229, 127977257, 127977266, 127977294, 127977308, 127977323, 127977332, 127977345, 127977349, 127977358, 127977365, 127977368, 127977377, 127977389, 127977396, 127977403, 127977412, 127977424, 127977434, 127977443, 127977447, 127977455, 127977469, 127977485, 127977498, 127977504, 127977527, 127977562, 127977565, 127977579, 127977599, 127977605, 127977615, 127977628, 127977633, 127977655, 127977664, 127977673, 127977684, 127977700, 127977730, 127977748, 127977772, 127977782, 127977796, 127977834, 127977840, 127977854, 127977855, 127977866, 127977869, 127977875, 127977889, 127977902, 127977964, 127977967, 127977978, 127977991, 127978002, 127978026, 127978041, 127978144, 127978151, 127978156, 127978170, 127978192, 127978228, 127978266.
user_6110846 (2022-10-24 06:57:52+00:00): https://www.volynpost.com/news/210299-u-gromadi-na-volyni-perejmenuvaly-50-vulyc
mapko (2022-10-24 10:26:20+00:00): Ahoj. Zmenil si tag highway z trunk na secondary a odstranil tag motorroad=yes. Uz nie je cesta oznacena znackou cesta pre motorove vozidla?
Valec (2022-10-24 16:20:00+00:00): Popravde neviem, či tam tá značka je alebo nie (šiel som okolo niekoľkoraz, dokonca z oboch strán a nikdy som si nevšimol), avšak v zmysle popisu mi tá cesta nepríde ako "high performance or high importance roads", keďže ide o obyčajnú cestu II. triedy.
S tagom trunk to vykresľuje zmätočne ako cestu vyššej kategórie, pričom cesta nie je v tomto úseku o nič významnejšia, ako na zvyšku, alebo napr. ako cesta II/143 medzi Malackami a Rohožníkom.
Ak tam tá značka je, tak potom motorroad=yes by tam zostať malo.
mapko (2022-10-24 17:08:32+00:00): Znacka tam bola aj v case dnesneho otvarania, vid. https://scontent-vie1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/311302355_489674673208394_6295603384939059684_n.jpg?_nc_cat=100&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=r165V-UnQCsAX-UXXyV&tn=oQ0dUvQp8zhUlNAU&_nc_ht=scontent-vie1-1.xx&oh=00_AT8LbEz8VsxwnByvtnSdCea1otTRVDoL7Ycan0kkoq_ziQ&oe=635B0874
BSK sa rozhodol tu cestu tak hlupo oznacit, tak by sme sa toho mali drzat. Konzultoval som to s aceman444 a zhodli sme sa na pouzitych tagoch.
Valec (2022-10-24 18:26:40+00:00): Podľa zákona 30/2020 možno takouto značkou označiť akúkoľvek cestu, z ktorej je vylúčená nemotorová doprava (čo sa dovtedy riešilo značkou so zákazom vjazdu pre bicykle, konské záprahy...).  V porovnaní so zahraničím to tak môže byť kľudne aj cesta III. triedy akýchkoľvek čiernych parametrov. To môže už od pohľadu (iná farba v mape) mýliť používateľov. Ale ak ste sa tak dohodli, budem to rešpektovať.
mapko (2022-10-24 18:44:32+00:00): Poslal som acemanovi link. 
Treba sa dohodnut ci uprednostnime evidencnu triedu alebo farbu. Chapem ze keby trunk zacinal od D1 tak by to vyzeralo lepsie.