piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:24:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:27:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
impiaaa (2021-02-05 15:29:41+00:00): Removal of what? And why? Did you check that each thing is no longer visible in imagery?
boopington (2021-02-05 21:49:38+00:00): of course I did, what else would I do?
impiaaa (2021-02-05 23:26:08+00:00): The changeset information gave me every reason to suspect it to be vandalism. It covers a large area, the description is a single word, the description does not describe what was removed or why, there is no "source" changeset tag to indicate that aerial imagery was the reason for removal, and your profile didn't have any additional information (except for a number of other similar-looking changesets, some with similar complaints). Additionally, broad removals are suspicious and hard to review in the first place. I will admit to also using short changeset descriptions sometimes, but more information is always better, and helps both the community and the project.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:21:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
VitalieS (2021-02-05 09:49:19+00:00): Bună.
Ați adăugat deja această frizerie la această locație acum 2 luni. E vreun motiv din care încercați să adăugați aceeași locație de mai multe ori?
user_5359 (2021-02-05 17:25:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8395797261: Did you mean man_made=pipline (but on a node)?
ivanbranco (2021-02-06 10:21:46+00:00): Hi alanluk,

what does the Proxmox=i tag means?
Alan LUK (VR2URF) (2021-02-06 12:16:38+00:00): Sorry that is a mistake, tag removed.
compdude (2021-02-15 01:52:09+00:00): FYI, in Canada, the standards for motorway seem to be different than the US in that they seem to agree that super-twos like this road can be tagged as motorway. There are many super-twos in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia that are tagged as motorway, as well as the the two-lane sections of A-50 in Quebec. 

In the US, we seem to have come to the agreement that super-twos are trunk, but that does not seem to be the case in Canada. It's important to familiarize yourself with tagging conventions in other countries when you do edits outside of the US.
blackboxlogic (2021-03-05 20:52:12+00:00): There are a few things about this change which I don't love. But mostly having features connected to unrelated features (forest to town) is just making everything harder for future mappers. I'd like to discuss alternatives if you plan to do more of this.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:37:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
abakus_uploader (2021-02-05 23:31:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-02-13 13:54:56+00:00): May I ask from which sources you added these river and creek names? You only mentioned bing aerial imagery as a source, please always mention all sources when uploading changesets. 

Also rivers should have a continuous classification, not alternating like the ones that you added here.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-18 01:05:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99482890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in te Philippines following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4752
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-18 01:05:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99482890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in te Philippines following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4752
eggie (2021-02-05 06:59:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-18 01:05:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99482890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in te Philippines following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4752
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-18 01:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99482890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in te Philippines following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4752
ted3sco (2021-02-11 23:51:34+00:00): Hello. Braila what ? Give more detailed description to what the edits are about. Your last week edits broke some ways. The landuses are not rendered anymore. Please use JOSM for more control over relations and big areas.
UNGSC-cronoser (2021-02-05 07:42:29+00:00): after UN colleagues has talked with the local community it's better to leave the national road in the relation RP527 (98689015) as a path.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:58:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:58:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
eggie (2021-10-17 11:03:21+00:00): Dag Ferina,

Zou je even hier nota van kunnen nemen?
Je hebt Kiltunnelweg veranderd in Provinciale weg, maar Verbeter de kaart geeft nu ook aan Kiltunnelweg.
Ook de oprit vanaf afslag McDonald staat als Kiltunnelweg in Verbeter de Kaart

Zie opmerking op de kaart van anoniem
Kijk je nog even?


https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2898497#map=16/51.7747/4.6453&layers=N

MVG
eggie
FERINA365 (2021-10-17 12:33:20+00:00): Ha Eggie,

Vreemd, want het NWB geeft aan dat deze weg Provincialeweg heet van de tunnel tot aan de A16.

Wat moeten we dan aanhouden?
eggie (2021-10-17 12:39:41+00:00): Echt geen idee Sven... 
Nergens staat een straatnaambord en ik weet ook niet wie anoniem is.
Het heeft wel eens meer ter discussie gestaan kan ik me herinneren. Het Kadasteradres van het nieuwe bedieningsgebouw is volgens mij Kiltunnelweg. Ik zou dus voor Kiltunnelweg gaan.
Er kan een opmerking worden gemaakt op Verbeter de kaart Kadaster. Doe jij dat?

Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2021-10-17 15:18:54+00:00): Zowel PDOK als BGT geven Kiltunnel aan als straatnaam.
In een overzicht van NWB zie ik aan de oostzijde Kiltunnelweg staan.
Maar ik kom niet helemaal goed uit de mogelijkheden van die site. 
De toerit vanaf de Rijksstraatweg kom ik niet uit. De PDOK geeft aan Rijksstraatweg De BGT omtrekgericht geeft aan Kiltunneleweg. 
De site van het Wegschap geeft net als het Kadaster Kiltunnelweg als hun adres.
https://www.kiltunnel.nl/

Wellicht is het ooit aangepast. 
Ik pas voorlopig de straatnaam weer aan naar Kiltunnelweg. 
Mocht het niet kloppen zet dan even een marker op verbeter de kaart.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=103313.06&geometry.y=420811.51&zoomlevel=12.16

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-17 16:01:52+00:00): 'k Heb A67-A67 even om advies gevraagd. 
Lijkt me wel dat in geval van een calamiteit de hulpdiensten de juiste straat kunnen vinden. 
Vreemd dat die kaartenmaker die met een G begint ook Provincialeweg aangeeft?
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-18 05:41:35+00:00): De naamgeving Kiltunnelweg stamt uit 2010.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=kiltunnelweg%20dordre&resultOffset=0&objectId=0505300000034280&geometry.x=102897.61&geometry.y=420744.192&zoomlevel=4&detailsObjectId=0505300000034280
De Provincialeweg op het Eiland van Dordrecht loopt van de Crayensteynstraat naar de Kop van het Land.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.79020/4.73399

Ik vermoed dat het later is aangepast om verwarring te voorkomen.
Bedenk dat op het Eiland van Dordrecht een aantal straatnamen dubbel voorkwamen. Er is ooit een Gemeentelijke herindeling geweest. 
Het grootste deel van het Eiland viel onder de voormalige gemeente Dubbeldam.
Zuidhoven als wijk kreeg nieuwe straatnamen. (Meidoornstraat, ed.) Allemaal dubbelingen.
De laatste opmerkelijke wijziging die ik me kan herinneren was de Simon de Danserweg over de A16. Die heette daarvoor meen ik ook Copernicusweg. (Ligt in Sterrenburg!) Was ook zoiets typisch. Die Copernicusweg is nooit doorgetrokken, want er kwam het Wielwijkpark tussen. 
De N217 kent overings in de Hoekse Waard ook nog stukken Provincialeweg net voorbij Campina en aan de oostzijde van Oud- Beijerland. 

Gr eggie
FERINA365 (2021-10-18 08:24:07+00:00): Hele vreemde situatie inderdaad. Maar zo laten op "Kiltunnelweg" dan. Op het oude tolpand stond op de zijkant zelfs "Provincialeweg 43" als straatnaam. Overige opties zijn dus "Kiltunnel", "Kiltunnelweg" en "Provincialeweg". Omdat het adres van het tolplein op Kiltunnelweg staat, kunnen we dus inderdaad aannemen dat dat de juiste optie is! :)
eggie (2021-10-18 08:41:38+00:00): Evt. zou old_name=  nog toegevoegd kunnen worden.
Maar er zijn wel meer vreemde zaken met namen in Dordt.
De wijk Wilgenwende (naam gebruikt door  projectontwikkelaar bouwproject) is ooit officieel door de Gemeente hernoemd naar Nieuw Groenhove.
Iedereen lijkt het vergeten incl. de bewoners. Zelfs op de bebording staat Wilgenwende. 
Alleen de Staatscourant rept nog over Nieuw Groenhove. 
Nu is er een nieuw bouw project; "Louisa's Weelde project Wilgenwende". Ben benieuwd wat dan de wijknaam gaat worden?
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:59:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
StefanHRT (2021-02-05 08:18:52+00:00): Hey Nico, Laut https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schlehenberg ist das doch auch eine geschützte Grünanlage. Ist dort Radfahren eigentlich erlaubt? Der freizeitpark Marienfelde ist z.B. ausdrücklich verboten. Gruß Stefan
NicoSa (2021-02-05 08:28:27+00:00): Guten Morgen Stefan, darauf habe ich leider heut früh nicht geachtet. Es würde schon Sinn machen. Ich versuche das nächste mal wenn ich dort bin darauf zu achten.
StefanHRT (2021-02-05 09:21:44+00:00): Na mal sehen wer von uns beiden da zu erst ist, war da ja auch noch nicht ;)
gileri (2021-02-05 09:33:46+00:00): Hi, thank you for fixing errors in OSM !

I noticed you created a way (by splitting an existing one) that has a source="Lyon orhtophoto 2015;local knowledge" tag.

However you indicate in your changeset message that you used "bdortho" as a source.

Usually source=* tags on objects are error-prone, so it's best to not use them, remove them when editing and putting the source in the changeset.

In addition, just before uploading the changeset in iD, there is a dedicated field for the source (instead of the message), that way it's more usable and readable.

Have a good day,

Éric
back_spin (2021-02-05 09:53:12+00:00): Hi! I'm just a modified turn restriction based on BDOrtho satellite road markings.
Thank you, I know that iD has a special field for the source (instead of the message), but the company insists on entering the source in the comment.
gileri (2021-02-05 10:33:17+00:00): Thank you for your answer !

I'm refering to this way, created in this changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904050253

Regarding the source in the changeset message, do you know by chance why they would require that ?
back_spin (2021-02-05 10:52:24+00:00): yes, there were claims of some community members from the UK, after which it was decided to add the source to the comment itself so that it was better seen. professionals, in turn, knows where to see which imagery used
gileri (2021-02-05 15:31:24+00:00): Ok, strange because most editors use the source field. Same with OSMCha, a tool from Mapbox :

https://osmcha.org/changesets/98776698

I wonder where it would be hard to see ?
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:59:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
andi9876 (2021-02-09 01:16:00+00:00): reverted
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:59:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:59:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:59:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
andi9876 (2021-02-09 01:15:33+00:00): del
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:59:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:59:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
AkuAnakTimur (2021-02-05 09:03:35+00:00): Many thanks for updating these structures: https://osm.org/go/4GooPcUB9--?m=

These happened to be an accommodation for tourists as well, hence, "building structures" was mapped by me after I visited there on 2016.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 19:00:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
MxxCon (2021-02-05 09:32:40+00:00): Hi.
Could you please write more descriptive changeset messages than just "e"? :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98752340
user_5359 (2021-02-08 19:00:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 19:00:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
mueschel (2021-02-08 21:41:49+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it got one strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8396323873
ErichJacobi (2021-02-09 08:53:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for your note. I have modified the tag.
aixbrick (2021-02-05 09:46:08+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du denn die Adresse der Schule vom Geländeumriss gelöscht und stattdessen als Node eingetragen?
Die Wikipedia/-data Tags würde ich auf das Gelände übertragen und evtl. aus den beiden einzelnen Flächen ein Multipolygon machen.
Gruß
Trizzels (2021-02-05 09:49:44+00:00): Hi, 
ich ging davon aus, dass das in diesem Falle besser ist, da das Schulgelände/Gebäude ja zweigeteilt ist und der postalische Eingang und der "Besucherhaupteingang" ja an der Stelle mit dem Node ist. 
Das mit dem Multipolygon ist ein guter Punkt. Hab ich nicht dran gedacht. 

Vielen Dank für Deine Hinweise.
aixbrick (2021-02-05 10:14:12+00:00): Dann müsstest du aber die Adresse auf den Eingangsknoten und ggf. entrance=main setzen, sonst fehlt da der Zusammenhang. Grundsätzlich darf die Adresse aber auch auf der Fläche hinterlegt sein. Das ist sogar sinnvoll, wenn man eine Auflistung aller Schulen über amenity=school erstellt und auch gern die Adressen hätte.
Trizzels (2021-02-05 10:16:33+00:00): Ok, guter Punkt. Ich ändere das und füge es wieder dem Gebäude zu.
aixbrick (2021-02-05 10:23:28+00:00): Danke
Kovoschiz (2021-02-05 09:29:41+00:00): Mistakened entry on `addr:postcode=`
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-18 01:05:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99482890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in te Philippines following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4752
pitfire (2021-02-11 07:11:47+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
Bitte Format " DE:Key:phone " einhalten. (phone=+<Landesvorwahl>-<Bereichsvorwahl>-<Rufnummer>
literan (2021-02-05 15:42:06+00:00): добрый день. Подскажите, а что за антенны вы вносите в базу?
Amegaz (2021-02-05 23:56:28+00:00): Hi DoubleA,
your Update looks like it’s located somewhere next to Munich, but the changeset goes over half of the world. Why have you done this and not reduced to a local update?

Best regards 
Amegaz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98756446
!bm (2021-02-09 20:31:16+00:00): Hallo sgr,

statt Löschen eines leerstehenden Geschäftslokals u.a. POI ist es in den allermeisten Fällen besser, disused:* zu setzen, s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused: (beachte generell  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix )

Der Grund ist ganz einfach, dass die Chronik erhalten werden soll:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Entsprechend geändert.

--besteGrüße!bm
sgr (2021-02-09 20:39:31+00:00): Hallo, alles klar - vielen Dank für den Hinweis und die Anpassung! Dieses Tag war mir noch nicht bekannt.
pyrog (2021-02-05 10:10:37+00:00): source=SiiG ??

Ce n'est pas une source valide ;)

Soit tu as constaté le nom sur le terrain : la source est alors survey.

Soit tu as retracé la route, la source est alors BDOrtho IGN (si c'est bien cette imagerie que tu utilises).

Soit les deux :)

Utiliser le tag source directement sur un objet se fait pour des imports.
Sinon ça n'a pas vraiment de sens ni d'utilité.

La pratique est de mettre les sources dans le changeset.
SiiG (2021-02-05 10:38:20+00:00): SIIG = Syndicat intercommunal d'information géographique
Je travaille pour le SIIG donc je mets SIIG en source
SiiG (2021-02-05 10:46:26+00:00): Source = "SiiG" nous avait été recommandé par un référent OSM.
En fait, nous recalons les voies sur des flux WMS issus de notre base de données. Ces flux WMS contiennent les tracés des voies et les numéros d'entrées de propriétés que nous mettons à jour, soit à partir d'une photographie aérienne, soit à partir de relevés GPS. Il est donc problématique de distinguer la source initiale des données sous JOSM. C'est donc pour cela que nous saisissons "source = SiiG" puisque nous utilisons les flux WMS du SiiG.