piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChristinaLL (2021-07-26 11:50:02+00:00): Thank you! Will keep that in mind next time!
Nakaner (2021-07-26 07:36:41+00:00): Hallo,

es genügt nicht, einfach nur die damage:*=*-Tags zu ergänzen. Diese dienen einzig und allein dazu, die Schäden dem Ereignis zuzuordnen. Es ist jedoch nicht davon auszugehen, dass diese je von einer Software, die OSM-Daten konsumiert, ausgewertet werden. Daher ist es erforderlich, dass Tags, wie man_made=bridge, highway=* usw. durch demolished:man_made=<alter Wert> bzw. demolished:highway=<alter Wert> ersetzt werden.

Bei Brücken, die nicht ganz kaputt sind und mit deren Reparatur oder Ersatz durch eine Hilfsbrücke gerechnet werden kann, kann auch highway=construction + construction=<alter Wert> sinnvoll sein.

Könntest du das bitte noch korrigieren?

Viele Grüße

Michael
mariotomo (2021-07-27 20:40:07+00:00): hola Carlos.  mira que con este conjunto de cambios tenemos tres objetos place todos con el nombre "Martín Grande".
cserpell (2021-07-26 13:43:03+00:00): Hola!

Gracias por los cambios y aportes. En este caso, creo que es un conjunto de edificios y no solo un edificio, como lo habías etiquetado. Te recomiendo leer más en la wiki de cómo etiquetar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Chile  .

Además, hay un grupo de telegram de la comunidad chilena, por si quieres unirte y preguntar ahí dudas que tengas o recibir aportes y noticias. https://telegram.me/OSMcl

Gracias,
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-03 20:52:01+00:00): Please don't add construction tags before construction starts. Instead use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
Warin61 (2024-05-19 08:54:20+00:00): Hi
Considering how long these 'proposals' have now existed and existed into the past .. I don't think these will come to pass in our life times.. not something worth mapping?
radiotrefoil (2024-05-19 09:00:03+00:00): Agreed, probably best to remove them now that I have learned more about the proposed tag
Shohreh (2021-10-08 21:39:28+00:00): Bonjour,

La rue du 8 mai 1945 à Arcueil est-elle vraiment en DSC ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27116666

Pas de M9v2 "sauf vélo", pas de marquage au sol et pas grand chose pour ralentir les voitures.

Merci.
John Kastner (2021-07-26 01:22:13+00:00): I tried to be clever and retroactively split up my changes into change sets for the three areas they were made in, but those changes sets didn't include deleted objects, so here's this. It's not that big so it's fine.
ovruni (2021-07-26 04:28:00+00:00): En este conjunto al igual que en los otros conjuntos de cambios se ha retirado etiquetas amenity. Procedo a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
bhietsch (2021-07-26 02:59:30+00:00): Why did you change this large portion of the Tuscarora Trail from highway=footway to highway=unclassified?
tonyf1 (2021-10-17 10:47:37+00:00): Reverted Changeset #112606256
Supaplex (2021-07-29 06:11:30+00:00): Hi Hi77,

It seems this roundabout does not exist in any satellite image
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967421872/history
Could you explain your edit?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108585654
Zaneo (2021-07-26 04:31:10+00:00): Net error ate this changeset.
woodpeck (2021-07-29 08:53:36+00:00): This changeset claims to have a soruce of "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta". Can you explain why the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967426282 is split in two halves? This is not something that shows on ESRI Clarity. Also, what is the data source for the additional information like amenity=police in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13019159 or name=Ex Mattatoio on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967426503? This is not information that seems to come from aerial imagery.
Eiim (2021-07-26 05:11:17+00:00): Hello,

Are this and the other 10 changesets uploaded presumably as a batch an import? If so, why didn't you use the mcheckimport user?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-26 07:54:34+00:00): Also, what is the actual source?

And where is the import documentation?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-26 08:08:31+00:00): Looking at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=478872 they are in habit of ignoring comments and importing invalid data - see say https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71770041
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-19 07:19:05+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

This import can be reverted at any time

Note that noneglish contact attempted was in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108662433
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-07-26 06:10:00+00:00): Simplify way, Tidy excessive nodes to 20 cm threshold.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108586909
Zaneo (2021-07-26 12:52:49+00:00): Sorry can you cite the license for this? I mean specifically, not generally. Where is the linked waiver or license that allows this to be utilized in OSM which may be used commercially.
ymrunali (2021-07-27 12:21:14+00:00): Hi  Zaneo,
Thanks for your valuable feedback. We sincerely understand the concerns raised by you. We did check on the site map pdf file for any information related to copyrights and usage, but unfortunately we couldn't find it. We are reaching out to the universities to understand more on this. Please give us a week's time to analyze the edits and re-evaluate our SOP based on the responses from university.
Thanks,
ymrunali
Zaneo (2021-07-28 00:28:07+00:00): Hello ymrunali,

Thanks for your prompt response! Yes I understand these kind of things can take time. I hope you're able to find the license, as this data would be great to have if we're allowed.

Kind regards,
Zaneo
Warin61 (2021-07-27 07:33:17+00:00): Hi
The parking relation 13019200 is incorrect. 
The roll 'inner' has be assigned to the outermost way which should have the role 'outer'. And all the ways with the role 'outer' are inside and mark features that should be excluded from the parking - so they should have the roll 'inner'!
nevw (2021-08-18 03:07:00+00:00): no response from mapper, fixed myself.
HirschKauz (2021-07-26 07:05:42+00:00): Hi physi,  
auch wenn es sehr bequem ist; magst Du bitte etwas präzisere CS-Kommentare abgeben als "minor corrections"?  
Kennst Du schon https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments  
Grüße, HirschKauz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108587788
physi_retired (2021-07-26 08:01:53+00:00): Hallo HirschKauz, 
vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis...
Gruß,
physi
user_5359 (2021-07-26 08:15:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8950148928? Why did you add a node with an pther name inside of the building "Engineering Building"?
surapdas (2021-11-26 12:02:43+00:00): Hi user_5359,
Apologies for the delay. 
Thanks for your question. I added a node to indicate the presence of Durret Hall (another building name) in that building. I added it based on the official site map available on the website. Please refer the source link: https://www.actx.edu/disability/pagesmith/15 
I would also like to convey that we have stopped making edits in OSM using university site maps as a source. Please let me know if you have any queries.
Thanks, 
surapdas
frosm (2025-11-29 07:31:44+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147372404/history/8
est-ce qu'il y a une différence entre "vieux goudron" et "asphalté, qualité moyenne" ?
catdreamer (2021-08-23 12:48:02+00:00): 請用natural=peak標示
mavl (2021-07-27 13:30:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Этот пакет правок добавляет название "Улица Осипенко, 95". Это не название в действительности.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
Agi on tour (2023-08-27 18:35:52+00:00): Weg 967458351, v1 kann man aus meiner Sicht nicht als leisure=park taggen. Das sind vermutlich einzelne Grundstücke mit Häusern und zugehörigem Umschwung. 
Im Wiki wäre das so definiert: "Open, green area for recreation, usually municipal."
Ich schlage vor, diesen Way zu löschen.
user_11418917 (2021-07-26 13:15:27+00:00): Stop adding spam!
stevea (2021-07-26 17:51:01+00:00): Thank you!  These are simply GOING TO drift over time.  It's great to see them getting updated.
Tomas Straupis (2021-07-26 11:56:39+00:00): Ne, tas laukų keliukas nėra Taikos g. Taikos g. yra iš šiaurės į pietus einantis stambesnis kelias.
user_13819583 (2021-07-26 16:15:19+00:00): ten yra gyvenama, bet prastos būklės sodyba, adresu Taikos g. 6. (turiu foto dėl visą ko) tai atšaka nuo pagrindinės gatvės, kuri dėl intensyviai vykdomo žemės ūkio aplink atrodo kaip lauko kelias. Būklė geresnė nei kelio į pietvarkarius į apleistą vienkiemį vidur laukų, tai kažkaip reikėtų suvienodinti tipus :)
Tomas Straupis (2021-07-26 18:24:25+00:00): Taip, adresas Taikos 6, bet tas privažiavimas neturi pavadinimo (pagal oficialius duomenis). Kelyje matosi artai provėžos, artai per vidurį žolė, tai čia track geriausiu atveju grade3. Plius tai atšaka, privažiavimas prie vienos sodybos, tai ji hierarchiškai mažiau svarbi, todėl niekaip netraukia iki pravažiuojamo kelio Taikos g. klasifikacijos.
InfosReseaux (2021-08-01 23:01:34+00:00): C'est vraiment excellent :)

Merci beaucoup
simlio (2021-08-09 20:50:04+00:00): Merci pour ton message qui m'encourage à continuer sur ce thème. Actuellement un peu bloqué par les problèmes de Volta. Peut être en MP pour de l'aide...
InfosReseaux (2021-08-11 23:06:13+00:00): Bonsoir Simlio,

En effet on a quelques soucis de serveur pour Volta en ce moment, ce devrait être réglé sous peu et je comprends que ce soit moins confortable.
La carto Enedis est encore dispo en ligne, ca aide tout de même
https://data.enedis.fr/pages/accueil/?id=dataviz-cartographie-des-reseaux

Je suis disponible sur le forum en cas de questions pour que tout le monde puisse avoir les réponses : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

Bonne soirée
eggie (2021-07-26 08:26:18+00:00): Dag Esmeralda.. Adresnode Verlengde Breevaart 33 heb ik teruggeplaatst.
Schade ontstaat door schuiven terwijl je een node hebt geselecteerd.
Je eigen edits.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108600845

MVG
eggie
gfdklgdldsfgkgfd (2022-07-04 14:57:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez supprimé une zone de construction sans reporter les attributs sur le bâtiment ni créer une zone résidentielle. Il y a eu une perte d'informations avec notamment le nom de la résidence. J'ai corrigé l'erreur et remis les attributs qui avaient été effacés.
Merci pour vos autres modifications
Cordialement
gfdklgdldsfgkgfd (2022-07-04 15:02:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123196603
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-03 09:01:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8950519708/history

Is it intentional that you created playground point within playground area? Which of them is not needed/mistagged?

Maybe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076589918#map=18/49.08464/18.01912 is actually a park, not playground?
Branko Kokanovic (2021-08-11 20:35:55+00:00): Zdravo,
Trudim se da sredim administrativne granice i jedan od najvecih problema mi je kada se "slepe" neki drugi putevi i admin_boundary. Evo jedan primer skorasnji: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967473276. Ako se setis, pazi molim te, da se lepis puteve za admin_boundary (znam da je tesko i da editor to jako lako spoji, ali eto - ako se setis, hvala!:)
limes11 (2021-07-26 08:09:56+00:00): Ich hatte bereits vehicle=no gesetzt, foot=yes und motor_vehicle=no sind überflüssig.
JassKurn (2021-07-26 19:37:25+00:00): Hi, You've traced a couple of patterns made in crops from different years from different imagery. These are were temporary with a years crop growing, and should not be mapped. 

Can you make another edit, and delete them? Thanks.
limes11 (2021-07-26 08:08:06+00:00): Hallo, 

"abandoned" passt nicht. Diese Brücken wurden nicht von ihren Besitzern aufgegeben, sie sind schlicht nicht mehr da. 

demolished:bridge=yes beschreibt dies geeignet. 

Viele Grüße, Limes
PT-53 (2021-07-27 06:23:25+00:00): Hallo FloToHu,
wenn eine Stromleitung komplett abgebaut wurde, sollte sie in OSM gelöscht werden.
Grüße
FloToHu (2021-07-27 10:16:30+00:00): Naja, ich überlasse das dem Ersteller der historic-Tags. Ich muß meine Fehler ja auch immer selbst ausmerzen. Ich hab nur drauf hingewiesen, daß Osmose QA hier eine Kette mit Anmerkungen für jeden power=historic:tower generiert.

Außerdem weiß ich nicht, ob die Strecke wirklich abgebaut ist. Vielleicht gibt es Strecke ja nich und es sind wirklich historische Strommasten^^. Das Tag ist ja nicht offiziell definiert.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2021-12-02 22:20:34+00:00): Hi,
Bitte segmentiere keine Kreisverkehre, das beschädigt die Relationen, die darüber laufen. Das Segmentieren macht nur Sinn, wenn die Segmente unterschiedlich getaggt werden müssen. Siehe dazu auch die Diskussion https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56452 .
Ich werde diese Änderung revertieren. BG Robert
eggie (2021-07-26 08:38:25+00:00): Hi  Maria...
Please don't delete the tag source=BAG .
It's important for updates from the Dutch land registry.. (Kadaster)
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108603984
Greetz,
eggie

.
marialoyko (2021-07-30 14:45:16+00:00): Hello eggie! Sorry for the inconvenience that my edit have caused and thank you for fixing the tag. Can I also ask you why this tag is important so that our team doesn’t make similar mistakes in the future? Thank you in advance.
eggie (2021-07-30 14:58:59+00:00): Hi Maria..

In the Netherlands we have a special OSM team for updating buildings and addressnodes from the Kadaster.
The source=BAG (Dutch Kadaster)
They work with a plugin. This tool can recognize the BAG buildings and addresses.
Without source=BAG the tool can't recognize the source and will double the building or the addressnode.

BAG means Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen (BAG)
Have a look here.. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/#?searchQuery=singel%2083%20am&resultOffset=0&objectId=0363200000268388&geometry.x=121276.96&geometry.y=487687.27299849&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0363010000809787

Greetz,
eggie
marialoyko (2021-07-30 15:07:45+00:00): Thank you for a very detailed explanation, eggie.
Moving forward, our team will pay closer attention to these tags.
Sorry for the inconvenience and thank you.
limmmoh (2021-07-27 12:35:41+00:00): Driver Feedback
eggie (2021-07-26 08:45:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Ziet er goed uit.
oneway=no hoeft niet op een wandelpad. oneway=yes kom je ook bijna nergens tegen.. behalve in Coronatijd misschien.




MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Chades (2021-07-26 11:57:32+00:00): Dank voor het nakijken. De tips zijn erg nuttig :)!
Mapping_95 (2021-07-28 06:10:03+00:00): Please refer to the official names of the bus stops in the future. Refrain from giving them a "made up name" or the name you find suitable. All bus stops around Hanoi have their own names and listed on TRANSERCO website. Please undo your previous errors.
ItsLouisAnderson (2021-07-28 07:58:59+00:00): Hi, I notice that you are changing names of some bus stops into the name of a bus route. If you want to map a bus route, please refer to the official guide on how to do that (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses). We need the bus stops to have their official names so users can easily navigate.
clw92 (2021-07-28 08:26:40+00:00): Thank you both for pointing me in the right direction. Sorry for my mistakes as I was clearly thinking about it wrong. Bus stops and routes are separate datasets. I'll clean it up today.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-26 09:31:24+00:00): Have you verified that this maps are legally compatible with OSM?
ymrunali (2021-07-26 12:32:34+00:00): Hi Mateusz Konieczny,
University layouts are in public domain to help people understand the locations quick and clear. We have utilized layouts to enrich OSM with same data which in-turn will help public understand locations within the university. We also follow similar practice in temporary road closure/construction scenarios, where we source data from DOT websites. Please let us know in case of concerns/queries. Happy to work with OSM community. 

Regards,
ymrunali
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-26 12:57:59+00:00): "University layouts are in public domain to help people understand the locations quick and clear"

Also http://www.acucamps.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/campus-map-1-17-copy.pdf ? That comes from https://www.acucamps.com/ with "All Rights Reserved" in the footer?

Can you point me to some place where it was released under open license?

Note that "public domain" does not mean "useful for all" or "should be openly licensed". 

It is a legal term, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain

Sadly, often data that should be openly licensed is not - that is why OSM was created in the first place.

In rare cases it is OK to import into OSM datasets from external sources, but only when licensing is 100% fine - OSM is not a project to explore gray areas of copyright and related laws.
tekim (2021-07-26 20:40:16+00:00): "University layouts are in public domain to help people understand the locations quick and clear" -  Just because a map is viewable by the public, does not mean it is "in the public domain."  The fact that the map "help people understand the locations" also has no bearing as to whether the map is in the public domain or not, or as to what license the map creator/owner may have attached to the map.  If you want to use sources like this you need to contact the university and get explicit permission to do so.
ymrunali (2021-07-27 08:28:07+00:00): Hello tekim & Mateusz Konieczny,
Thanks for your valuable feedback. We sincerely understand the concerns raised by you. We did check on the site map pdf file for any information related to copyrights, but unfortunately we couldn't find it. We are reaching out to the universities to understand more on this. Please give us a week's time to analyze the edits and re-evaluate our SOP based on the responses from university.  
Thanks,
ymrunali
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-27 09:16:48+00:00): For other concerns and bonus complexity note:

- creative work is protected by default, lack of anything indicating copyright status does not mean that it is not copyrighted (Since March 1, 1989, no copyright notice has been required in USA for copyright to apply)
- in USA facts and collections of facts are not protected unless creative (database right and sweat of brow legal doctrines are not present ), so it may or may not be allowed
- copying external data into OSM database requires following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
ymrunali (2021-07-27 12:23:13+00:00): Hi Mateusz Konieczny,

Thanks for this highly useful wiki link. We will definitely make sure that our edits are in alignment with the community guidelines. As requested earlier, kindly give us a week's time to analyze the guidelines and re-evaluate our SOP and edits. 

Thanks, 
ymrunali
Anton Khorev (2021-09-28 12:37:04+00:00): Hello. Is there any news about this?
ymrunali (2021-09-29 08:21:20+00:00): Hi Anton Khorev,
Post feedback from OSM community, we immediately stopped updating OSM data with PDF maps from university websites. We also reached out to universities on the copyright issues but didn’t hear back anything from them. Going forward we will not add any information unless we have a go ahead from universities but unsure how to act upon the data which was already added. Please do let me know if you have any suggestions to course correct the data which is already added.

Thanks, 
ymrunali
Dawid2849 (2021-07-26 08:32:47+00:00): Proszę, nie ruszaj za bardzo plac Wolności, też tam edytuję.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-26 09:32:27+00:00): Have you verified that this maps are legally compatible with OSM?

If you participate in some organized editing - can you forward this question to whoever organized it?
sbongoni (2021-07-26 11:00:05+00:00): Sitemap Copyrights
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-26 12:02:37+00:00): https://www.aims.edu/ has https://www.aims.edu/about/terms.php

with 

"While Aims Community College provides the information on this server to anyone, we retain copyright on all text, graphic images and other content. This means that you may not: distribute the text or graphics to others without the express written permission of Aims Community College; "mirror" this information on your server without our permission; or modify or re-use the text or graphics on this system. You may print copies of the information for your own personal use and reference this server from your own documents. Commercial use of the materials is prohibited without the written permission of Aims Community College."

?

Or some other part?
sbongoni (2021-07-27 09:58:30+00:00): Hi Mateusz Konieczny,

Thanks for your valuable feedback. We sincerely understand the concerns raised by you. We did check on the site map pdf file for any information related to copyrights, but unfortunately we couldn't find it. We are reaching out to the universities to understand more on this. Please give us a week's time to analyse the edits and re-evaluate our SOP based on the responses from university.  

Thanks,
sbongoni
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-26 09:32:23+00:00): Have you verified that this maps are legally compatible with OSM?

If you participate in some organized editing - can you forward this question to whoever organized it?
laksanka (2021-07-28 14:10:51+00:00): Hi Mateusz Konieczny,
Thanks for your valuable feedback. We sincerely understand the concerns raised by you. We did check on the site map pdf file for any information related to copyrights and usage, but unfortunately we couldn't find it. We are reaching out to the universities to understand more on this. Please give us a week's time to analyse the edits and re-evaluate our SOP based on the responses from university.
Thanks,
laksanka
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-26 09:32:20+00:00): Have you verified that this maps are legally compatible with OSM?

If you participate in some organized editing - can you forward this question to whoever organized it?
rebsrika (2021-07-26 12:30:16+00:00): Hi Mateusz Konieczny,
University layouts are in public domain to help people understand the locations quick and clear. We have utilized layouts to enrich OSM with same data which in-turn will help public understand locations within the university. We also follow similar practice in temporary road closure/construction scenarios, where we source data from DOT websites. Please let us know in case of concerns/queries. Happy to work with OSM community. 
Regards,
rebsrika.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-26 12:59:07+00:00): "University layouts are in public domain to help people understand the locations quick and clear"

Also https://www.wcu.edu/WebFiles/CampusMap2016.pdf ? That comes from https://www.acucamps.com/ with "All Rights Reserved" in the footer?

Can you point me to some place where it was released under open license?

Note that "public domain" does not mean "useful for all" or "should be openly licensed".

It is a legal term, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain

Sadly, often data that should be openly licensed is not - that is why OSM was created in the first place.

In rare cases it is OK to import into OSM datasets from external sources, but only when licensing is 100% fine - OSM is not a project to explore gray areas of copyright and related laws.
rebsrika (2021-07-27 08:34:29+00:00): Hi Mateusz Konieczny,

Thanks for your valuable feedback. We sincerely understand the concerns raised by you. We did check on the site map pdf file for any information related to copyrights, but unfortunately we couldn't find it. We are reaching out to the universities to understand more on this. Please give us a week's time to analyse the edits and re-evaluate our SOP based on the responses from university.  

Thanks,
rebsrika.