piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
andrewwiseman (2018-11-27 20:56:40+00:00): Hi, where did you get these street names from? It sounds like a bunch of friend's names. Please don't add any street names that aren't the official or local name, and it's best not to add names unless you have been to that location.
GerdP (2016-01-28 08:03:35+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!
Du hast hier einige Wege mit highway=crossing erfaßt. Dieses Tag gehört eigentlich an den Knoten, den sich der Fußweg mit der (Auto-)straße teilt, der Fußweg selbst soll mit 
highway=footway + footway=crossing 
gemappt werden. Siehe auch
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:crossing
viel Spaß beim Mappen weiterhin
Gerd
inaktiv (2016-02-04 12:09:45+00:00): Moin Moin,
dankeschön für deine Kommentar, sorry für die falsche Handhabung.
Ich gelobe Besserung!
Beste Grüße,
Max
GerdP (2016-02-04 13:40:37+00:00): Alles klar, viel Spaß beim Mappen!
aappeexx (2016-02-15 22:14:03+00:00): Skąd wzięły się te drogi? W rzeczywistości są tu ogródki działkowe.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-02 02:45:55+00:00): Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3089011667/history is best described as a guest house rather than any other sort of tourist accommodation?
literan (2016-01-27 15:02:23+00:00): вы пожалуйста определитесь, что это - кафе или фабрика лозоплетения. и инфу о том, кому принадлежит - сюда тащить не надо. Вместо этого добавьте хоть один содержательный тег. Пока откатываю, определяйтесь
jc86035 (2016-02-01 04:31:31+00:00): Like Prince Edward Road East, even if a road is constructed similarly to a highway, it should not be tagged as "highway=motorway" unless it is part of the route system and has green signage (except for Sha Lek Road). Ma On Shan Road is not part of Route 2 and should therefore be tagged as a primary road (highway=primary).
YarNik (2016-01-31 10:20:39+00:00): почитай пожалуйста http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=573553#p573553
jorge_o (2016-01-27 17:53:58+00:00): Borraste un track amigo
muralito (2018-12-22 20:56:08+00:00): Esto me es dificil evaluarlo ahora tres años desṕues, pero parecia bien.

Una relacion por cada ruta real de ciclovia, lo que vos pretendias unir creo que hubiera sido mejor usando relacion de tipo "network",como en este ejemplo https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8410 (compuesta por las relaciones "route").
jc86035 (2016-02-01 04:31:33+00:00): Like Prince Edward Road East, even if a road is constructed similarly to a highway, it should not be tagged as "highway=motorway" unless it is part of the route system and has green signage (except for Sha Lek Road). Airport Road is not part of Route 8 and does not have green expressway signage.
00crashtest (2016-02-02 08:55:44+00:00): It doesn't have to have a green sign to be called a motorway, more properly a controlled-access highway. As long as a road has a central divider or median, has no intersections, has no pedestrian crossings, and has no curbside sidewalks, it can be called a motorway or freeway. Now, Lung Cheung Road does have sidewalks, however, they are separated from the road, that is, pedestrians cannot accidentally step into the street, so it is still a motorway.
jc86035 (2016-02-02 09:19:42+00:00): OSM Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HK:Hong_Kong_tagging#.E8.A1.97.E9.81.93.E5.88.86.E9.A1.9E_Classifications_of_streets

Per tagging convention, in Hong Kong, if a road is not classified as an expressway by the Government of Hong Kong and not part of a tunnel area, it cannot be tagged as a motorway (highway=motorway).

Any part of the Hong Kong Strategic Route and Exit Number System which is not classified as an expressway is tagged as a trunk road (highway=trunk).

For comparison, only M roads (e.g. M25) in the United Kingdom are tagged as highway=motorway and only A roads are tagged as highway=trunk.

All other important roads in both the UK and Hong Kong, regardless of if they are controlled-access roads or have sixteen lanes or whatever, are tagged as primary roads (highway=primary).

I know you have only been an editor for a week, but you have made a very large change to what has been the tagging convention for the last several years without any discussion.

Since it would take a lot of work for me to put the tags back together myself, I have emailed data@openstreetmap.org and asked them to revert your classification changes, per discussion at https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/47773/problems-with-mass-retagging-and-others.
00crashtest (2016-02-02 09:34:56+00:00): A1(M) at Peterborough is tagged as a motorway
jc86035 (2016-02-02 09:49:44+00:00): I forgot to mention the roads with the (M) suffix – these are parts of A roads which are classified by the government as having motorway standard. In any case, Hong Kong has a different system to the UK.
jc86035 (2016-02-02 09:53:48+00:00): If you didn't click the link to the OSM Wiki page, please do. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HK:Hong_Kong_tagging#.E8.A1.97.E9.81.93.E5.88.86.E9.A1.9E_Classifications_of_streets
00crashtest (2016-02-02 10:09:11+00:00): Ok, I just read the links. I also saw motorroad. Then I will suggest OpenStreetMap to create a "motorroad" road type.
jc86035 (2016-02-02 10:17:40+00:00): Where did you find "motor road" in the links and what purpose would this road type have? I believe the current types (motorway, trunk, primary, secondary, tertiary, unclassified, residential) are sufficient already.
GerdP (2016-01-28 08:13:23+00:00): Hi there!
You changed a highway=path
to the unusual highway="cycle route" here.
Was that intended?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304087643
Maybe you wanted to change the relation?
angelica93 (2016-01-28 10:39:32+00:00): the problem is fixed thank you
ndm (2016-01-28 00:36:35+00:00): Might also add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378568950 ?

Think this is a recent addition.
aseerel4c26 (2016-10-04 18:29:18+00:00): revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42638780
Hjart (2016-01-27 17:37:42+00:00): Bemærk at kirken i forvejen var markeret med navn mm (se bygningen). Jeg har derfor tilladt mig at slette din ændring.
5m4u9 (2016-01-29 05:26:39+00:00): con duda en las calles peatonales... son de ése tipo? creo que por el lugar lo que son en realidad son gradas o escaleras... si fuese así hacer el cambio.
ianlopez1115 (2016-01-28 04:19:00+00:00): Hi,

Bus stops are usually tagged as highway=bus_stop. If you need further assistance, feel free to contact me or other members of the OpenSteetMap Philippines community.
Ahn Bustamante (2016-01-30 18:43:35+00:00): It's not even in the highway so I don't think that's appropriate
5m4u9 (2016-01-29 05:28:23+00:00): bajo qué criterio se asignó vía terciaria en lugar de residencial?...

cambiar de residencial a ternaria hará que programas y mapas conduzcan a autos a utilizar estas vías sobre otras para ganar velocidad... y por ende ir más rápido.
5m4u9 (2016-01-29 05:30:11+00:00): según mi parecer, primarias=anillos, secundarias= radiales, terciarias=vías más utilizadas entre bloques residenciales
smaprs (2016-01-27 17:50:08+00:00): Why should I use Changeset Comments? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments.3F
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 11:57:08+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1251664 ?
dudka (2016-01-27 20:31:57+00:00): Все дома просмотрены по отдельности при переносе или просто все числовые name попали в addr:housenumber не глядя?
parukhin (2016-01-27 20:50:17+00:00): Просмотрены, по отдельности или группами (целые улицы встречаются). Варианты когда name <> housenumber  остались в базе, или когда у школы в name только номер. Не правил номера на территориях баз отдыха/санаториев/итп, на промышленных территориях.
Alecs01 (2016-01-29 20:30:03+00:00): solo footway cancellate in questo changeset, perché? puoi rispondere qui per favore, grazie
GS25 (2016-02-01 04:12:25+00:00): Hello again.  This road was correctly classified, and checked with gps.  Bing imagery is not accurately aligned, and you can not determine the road classification from the imagery.  Please revert this edit.
anu_smita (2019-07-23 03:05:31+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways 

"way 394165932
way 394165965
way 394165931
way 394165955"

classified as 'unclassified' and 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' as here tag is 'landuse = residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-29 14:16:19+00:00): I will amend the boundary of the residential area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318224761) later. There are only a few houses in the area, but obviously the retail buildings next to the major highway dominates the landuse (retail).

The details of the highways of this area may be left untouched as they are.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-29 14:17:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394165932
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394165965
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394165931
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394165955
Javier Sanchez (2018-01-26 20:42:01+00:00): En relación al etiquetado de colmenas, por favor visita esta página
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Tag:craft%3Dbeekeeper
MKnight (2016-01-31 12:19:20+00:00): Die Fehler bzw. Warnungen, die JOSM bei solchen Konstruktionen ausspuckt, sind in aller Regel nicht ausgedacht.

Das betrifft nicht nur dieses CS.
naoliv (2016-01-28 18:35:09+00:00): Silva, tente na medida do possível apenas ajustar ou corrigir alguma coisa errada, ao invés de apagar para depois fazer novamente.
Por exemplo, neste caso da rodovia duplicada, não havia necessidade de apagar um trecho dela para fazer os dois sentidos.
Bastaria deixar o caminho que já existe como sendo de mão única e desenhar o outro sentido da rodovia, reaproveitando assim o que já existe.
smaprs (2016-01-28 18:45:53+00:00): Recopiadas as etiquetas perdidas com a rodovia deletada: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394172303/history
SilvaJ (2016-01-29 01:58:46+00:00): É mesmo, mas é porque eu sou novato ainda, mas estou pegando o jeito agora.
Valeu!
Hjart (2016-01-27 19:59:50+00:00): Hej
Jeg har selvfølgelig bemærket at du har været meget aktiv med indtegning af bygninger i Roskilde og kom i tanke om at du i den forbindelse måske kunne være interesseret i følgende: https://www.mapbox.com/blog/fast-building-tracing/. Jeg benytter mig selv af denne teknik og nu har en af Mapbox folkene været så venlig at strikke en lille instruktion sammen. God fornøjelse
MittaaDK (2016-01-28 11:34:37+00:00): Hej
Takker for input.
Har læst om teknikken/modulet, og tænker at det bestemt er en god ide at udnytte mulighederne i JOSM i stedet for at hænge fast i ID ...
Det er heldigvis snart week-end :-)
Hjart (2016-01-28 12:40:50+00:00): Det minder mig i øvrigt om http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Polyglot/diary/37764, som helt sikkert kan være en god starthjælp for nye JOSM brugere.
MittaaDK (2016-01-29 18:14:11+00:00): Hej Hjart
Godt nok et effektivt redskab når der skal tegnes huse! Føler mig allerede hjemme i  JOSM, så fint du skubbede lidt på. 
Synes stadig at ID er mere visuelt overskuelig og kan godt lide måden man tagger de forskellige objekter (noder og områder) på. 
Tænker at jeg vil skifte mellem ID og JOSM afhængig af hvad jeg lige er i gang med at mappe. 
God weekend til dig :-)
user_5359 (2016-01-27 21:24:35+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Es reicht leider nicht nur den Namen zu wechseln. Bis eben war dort ein Optiker mit dem Namen Haarschnitte platziert.
literan (2016-01-28 12:07:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3971964019

так все же это Мак или Сабвэй??
deep125 (2016-01-28 12:20:40+00:00): Да это Мак. Прозевал тег при копировании.
arcanma (2016-02-12 08:33:32+00:00): Con i tag impostati possono accedere solo pedoni, bici e furgoni per consegna merci, essendo poi raggiungibile solo da via De Filis, esclusivamente pedonale, le bici e i furgoni non la raggiungerebbero mai. Tempo fa avevo messo le restrizioni della ZTL sulle vie del centro, non modificando quelle definite solo pedonali, forse è il caso di rivedere tutte le classificazioni del centro, lasciando pedonali quelle che effettivamente lo sono, ad esempio Corso Tacito e almeno parte di Piazza della Repubblica, dove credo al massimo possano circolare (legalmente) i mezzi di emergenza e forse le biciclette, per le tutte le altre credo valgano le stesse restrizioni della ZTL, eventualmente da migliorare i tag per rispecchiare al meglio il contenuto dell'ordinanza.
GS25 (2016-02-01 03:12:31+00:00): Hi there.  There are two problems with your edits.  Firstly, Bing aerial imagery is not accurately aligned.  You must move the image layer before editing, or your features will be in the wrong place.

Secondly, Bing aerial imagery is quite old in places.  The motorway exit you have mapped was demolished 3 months ago and has been deleted.  Please revert your edit.
eggie (2017-01-26 09:40:36+00:00): Dag wvdp,
Het Matenpark het ik als place=locality getagd en de leisure=park verwijderd anders ligt Leisure park op de landuse forest en grass. De naam staat er gewoon nog op. Mee eens? Zie ook discussie op het forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57117 Groet, Egbert
user_5359 (2016-01-28 05:15:01+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wenn das Stück des Baches verrohrt ist, fehlt dann nicht noch Beschreibungen analog zu der Straßenunterführung? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185773576 ?
ziegel78 (2016-01-28 15:32:33+00:00): Die weiteren 230m bis zum Auslauf an der Benzingeröder Chaussee, teils offen/verrohrt, entlang Hotel und unter dem Lidl-Parkplatz, fallen dann eher unter die Kategorie Kanalkataster. Wichtig bei meiner Korrektur war, dass der Bach nicht offen zum Ziegelbergsweg fließt. In dem kleinen Weg ist ja auch schon eine Brücke verzeichnet.
jc86035 (2016-02-01 04:50:48+00:00): Please don't re-tag trunk routes not classified as highways (i.e. with green signs), or not in tunnel areas, as motorways (highway=motorway). These roads should be tagged as trunk roads (highway=trunk).
West Lake (2016-02-01 16:45:17+00:00): Apologies. I was assuming because they met all criteria for motorways they should be upgraded for routing consistency as well as rendering consistency. Is there a resource you use to verify which roads are trunk vs. motorway? (i.e. list of route names/classifications)

Thanks
-W
jc86035 (2016-02-02 06:40:52+00:00): OSM Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HK:Hong_Kong_tagging#.E8.A1.97.E9.81.93.E5.88.86.E9.A1.9E_Classifications_of_streets

Generally, expressways in Hong Kong are distinguished by green destination signs and kilometre markings. Most of them are part of the route system, but two (Penny's Bay Highway and Sha Lek Road) are not.

Tunnels and tunnel areas are also tagged as highway=motorway. (In my nearly three years here I have yet to find out why, but I digress.)
jc86035 (2016-02-02 13:17:45+00:00): FYI the reason the situation currently looks so inconsistent is because user 00crashtest, for some reason, decided without any community discussion whatsoever to tag every road without an at-grade intersection as highway=motorway. I have asked data@openstreetmap.org to revert this change, per https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/47773/problems-with-mass-retagging-and-others.
woodpeck (2016-02-03 22:24:44+00:00): I'll attempt to fix this later today.
RicoElectrico (2016-01-28 11:46:53+00:00): Myślę, że użycie pola nazwy do opisania ruin jest bardzo na wyrost. W ogóle w tym polu powinny znajdywać się właściwe nazwy, a nie opisy np. "była wartownia", "ruina". Użyłbym building=ruins (jako że patrząc na geoportal nadal stoi i nikogo nazwanie tego budynkiem nie powinno zmylić - w przeciwieństwie do takich ruin gdzie mamy parę cegieł na krzyż). Do opisów mamy pole description (nie note - tutaj się pisze uwagi dla maperów). Proszę o poprawę.
zarl (2016-08-19 15:35:09+00:00): Hallo Knödel 0815, wie kommst du denn zu der Änderung für diesen Radwegabschnitt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24059367 ? Den hast du zur Einbahnstraße gemacht und den motorisierten Verkehr für Anlieger freigegeben, obwohl die angrenzenden Wege alle NICHT oneway sind und auch nur für forstwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge freigegeben sind. Auf welchen Informationen beruht deine Aktualisierung? Warst du vor Ort, gibt es Fotos, die die oneway-Situation irgendwie rechtfertigen?

Gruss,
Zarl
Knoedel_0815 (2016-08-23 16:52:51+00:00): Upps, das mit der Einbahnstraße war nicht beabsichtigt. -> Werde ich ändern.

Ich wohne in der Nähe und fahre dort täglich mit dem Radl lang. Das mit "Anlieger frei" stimmt und bezieht sich auf die Gebäude bei N47.86557 E11.48578: Dort steht ein Mehrfamilienhaus und eine Lagerhalle.

Gruß, Knödel 0815
zarl (2016-08-23 21:48:09+00:00): Ah prima, vielen Dank schon mal für die Korrektur! Das ist ja einer der wichtigeren Radrouten in Bayern, und dabei fehlt hier noch die neue Relation München-Venedig http://maps.muenchen-venezia.info/#resourceDetail,4260333

Ciao,
Zarl
jptolosa (2016-09-01 01:29:49+00:00): Hola, 
dónde obtuviste la altitud del Volcán Overo? Me parece que ésta es un poco mayor (aprox. 4.800 msnm).
Saludos.
Hernan (2016-09-01 12:15:10+00:00): Hola:
Lo saque de la capa del SIG del IGN de Argentina que lapodes ver aca a traves de Josm wmts[1,20]:https://ide.ign.gob.ar/geoservicios/rest/services/Mapas_IGN/mapa_topografico/MapServer/WMTS/1.0.0/WMTSCapabilities.xml
Saludos
Hernan
Hernan (2016-09-01 12:17:15+00:00): Y esta bien el cambio que hiciste a volcán, no se que me paso en su momento, porque así figura también en el IGN, debo haber estado dormido... :)
Saludos
jptolosa (2016-09-03 05:56:11+00:00): Gracias por la aclaración. También la cumbre del volcán estaba a como 1 kilómetro al oeste. Aunque el IGN sea una fuente oficial no es tan buena idea "calcar" todos los datos de la capa, ya que posee un margen de error.
Saludos.
Hernan (2016-09-03 11:00:53+00:00): Si,lo se. Con los picos cuando los único uso la capa de niveles de OpenCycleMap para buscar el pico y luego lo corroboro con las imágenes de Bing y Mapbox. El tema del IGN con errores lo estamos usando para sacar información ya que liberaron todos sus datos y al mismo tiempo les mostramos sus errores, aunque el arreglo del lado de ellos es lento por ser estructura burocrática. Hay varias personas del IGN que colaboran con OSM. Estas en el grupo de Telegrama de Argentina?
Saludos
jptolosa (2016-09-04 07:19:50+00:00): No sabía eso, dónde está ese grupo?
Saludos.
Hernan (2016-09-04 12:07:32+00:00): Hola
La dirección es telegram.me/osm_ar si ya usas telegram creo que @osm_ar Si tenes problemas para unirte, pásame tu alias de telegram y te agrego, pero no creo que tengas ningún problema
Saludos
Hernan
jptolosa (2016-09-06 01:49:12+00:00): Gracias, ahora me he unido.
Saludos.
Hjart (2016-01-27 23:15:29+00:00): Hej
Jeg har tilladt mig at rette størstedelen af hvad du har lavet her.
MKnight (2016-01-28 10:59:43+00:00): Die Fehlermeldung bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40039797#map=18/47.54476/9.68156 "only name and area" sagt Dir, dass da eine Eigenschaft wie highway oder amenity etc. fehlt.
Ich tendiere zu amenity=bus_station
TFTD (2016-01-28 12:24:00+00:00): Danke für das Feedback! Ich tendiere dazu, dass komplett zu löschen. Bus Station ist Falsch. Da gibt es separate. Der User der diese Fläche eingefügt hat, hat glaube ich auch 2 Flächen für bus_station (Regionalbusse und Fernbusse) eingefügt die sich zu großen Teilen überdeckt haben. Ich hab das mit diesem Edit mal sortiert und ordentlich abgegrenzt.
Ich vermute, dass man damit halt den gesamten Bahnhofsvorplatz als "Straßenfläche" kennzeichnen wollte. Aber die Ausdehnung beinhaltet gerade noch Straßen mit anderen Adressen.
Matteo Calosi (2017-10-28 19:15:03+00:00): Ciao, cosa sarebbe questa traccia? Di sicuro non sono le cenge dei partigiani che passano più in alto. Mi verrebbe da dire che è la Cresta del Serpente e il percorso per il suo attacco guardando la zona. Ho cancellato il nome precedente in attesa di chiarimenti.
Fabrizio Barbato (2017-10-30 09:08:08+00:00): Ciao Matteo. Ho controllato la zona. Anche con i layer su Google Earth. Hai perfettamente ragione qui intorno c'è un po' di confusione.

Allora le cenge partono dalle gorfigliette quindi l'attacco che qui è segnato va bene, poi però vedo il sentiero che a un certo punto stacca e va su al Pizzo ma non mi sembra corretto. Le cenge dovrebbero passare più basse. Urge una correzione. Nel giro di questo mese mi posso organizzare per andare a tracciarlo con GPS e "restaurare" la zona o per reperire una traccia valida delle cenge.
Matteo Calosi (2017-10-30 10:33:53+00:00): C'è una mia traccia aggiunta adesso su OSM delle cenge ma arriva solo fino al canale centrale perché sono salito di là senza chiudere il giro. L'attacco a me sembra sbagliato, le cenge partono (in realtà arrivano perché è consigliabile la percorrenza in senso antiorario) al di sopra della piazzola dell'elicottero, circa 200m più in lato di quello attualmente indicato, la carta 4land fa lo stesso errore. Quel percorso più basso per quanto possa esistere non è le cenge dei partigiani e immagino sia più impegnativo.
Fabrizio Barbato (2017-10-30 15:16:58+00:00): Non riesco a visualizzare la tua traccia
Matteo Calosi (2017-10-30 17:39:42+00:00): Ora l'ho anche resa pubblica sul mio profilo, ma comunque è già aggiunta nel database OSM anche
Rui Oliveira (2016-01-28 23:41:51+00:00): Boa noite. É actualmente existe actualmente uma regra implementada na comunidade OSM que refere a necessidade de deixar comentários nas edições. Aliás o editor ID, nem sequer deixa gravar sem um comentário.
Jean Passepartout (2016-09-15 15:28:34+00:00): Hi Andre Engels,  Thank you for your OpenStreetMap contributions!  On this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381714190, I notice it wraps around, making a U shape and overlaps another street (which is how I found it).  Does the name actually turn twice?  Can you review and fix this?  Thank you and Happy Mapping! Jean Passepartout
ramtin kurd (2016-01-28 01:54:00+00:00): قیه
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-13 02:59:27+00:00): Hi totokwahyu. Your edit looks awesome, but I need to improve geometry (Way 394245052). If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142906902). Thank you.
maraf24 (2016-01-29 22:12:08+00:00): KFC to klasyczny amenity=fast_food
GokuMK (2016-01-30 02:18:50+00:00): Podmienię przy uzupełnianiu danych do punktów gastro.
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-01-28 10:28:40+00:00): Речь идет о платежныз терминалаж описанных http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dpayment_terminal если да то желательно добавить теги из данной статьи. Если возникнут затруднения пишите в обсуждении.
R0bst3r (2016-01-28 20:56:14+00:00): Please stop adding such waste to osm ...
katpatuka (2016-01-28 09:04:29+00:00): Ey kumma! noch einer aus'm pott! ;) 

Im #osm IRC kanal hat einer gemeckert, datta wieder einer eine strasse mit landuse mixt (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394288200) - dat is ein dauerstreit (auch wenn ich mir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:landuse anschaue) Ich mixe nicht, aber ich benutze auch josm, wo das wohl leichter zu managen ist... dat nur so nebenbei gesacht ;)
mtbbiker99 (2016-03-09 19:51:15+00:00): Was soll ich gemacht haben? Einer Straße mit dem tag landuse vergeben haben?
Wenn das so war, sorry....

Kann mir jemand den Fehler genauer erklären?

Gruß aus RE.
katpatuka (2016-03-10 04:56:03+00:00): Das benutzen verschiedener tag-kategorien auf einem weg kann manchmal die sache verkomplizieren: landuse mit highway oder river mit boundary - außerdem kann dann nur ein name vergeben werden (beispiel für fluss und grenze getrennt hier: http://osm.org/go/2rCyU4ldo ) Andererseits sind auch zwei wege direkt übereinander in einigen editoren schwierig zur händeln - erst gestern fragte frau im chat kanal, wie sie denn den unteren weg selektieren könne im iD editor...