piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eastender (2016-12-27 01:27:41+00:00): Originally way 4487075 formed part of a roundabout. The local authority refers to it as a longabout, which reflects the shape of the junction. Traffic could circulate in a clockwise direction, although the junction where the way meets the east side of the roundabout was traffic light controlled. When the construction work in Bank Street started a few months ago, this way was closed to the public but was retained as a service road for construction vehicles entering the Bank Street construction site. That’s the current situation and it is likely to remain like that until at least 2019. So, the suggestion to remove the A road ref to more accurately reflects the way’s current status is a good one. We can then re-establish the necessary tags, when the way re-opens around 2019 and we know what the junction with it and Westferry Road / Bank Street looks like.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-04 11:08:25+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! 
You've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4379946790 as a hunting stand called "pay toll".
Please be aware that when you add things in MAPS.ME you're actually adding things to OpenStreetMap, and everyone will see them.  If this really does exist as a toll booth then please change it (using a proper OSM editor, not MAPS.ME) to indicate that it's a toll booth, not a hunting stand.
If you'd like any help doing this please let me know.
Best Regards,
Andy
Omnific (2016-09-02 01:21:04+00:00): I'll be correcting these from government offices to their correct office type later.
vramirez122000 (2016-12-21 02:35:03+00:00): la etiqueta de "crossing" debe ir solo sobre el nodo de intersección entre la vía peatonal y la vía de carros. Revertí el trayecto de highway=crossing a highway=footway ya que el servicio de routing peatonal había dejado de funcionar
ovruni (2018-12-13 17:26:01+00:00): Hola, la vía 440273614 tiene la clave "he" que no existe.
trigpoint (2016-09-02 07:20:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. I am a little confused by this edit, a terraced street is not the usual place to find a shelter. Please could you explain what you were trying to achieve?
Supaplex (2016-09-15 14:33:33+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:17:44+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-09-03 18:35:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move the point to the  correct building. And in the value of description you say the name is „EOS Home“?!
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:17:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-09-03 18:22:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Supermarkt or pharmacy? If both, the both shops will get one point in the building. If you need help: You are welcome!
jimthoburn (2016-09-03 18:58:16+00:00): Thanks, user_5359. Exactly. It’s a grocery store with a pharmacy. I’m unsure how to add a point for each, so I removed the amenity=pharmacy tag. Thanks again!  ~JIm
user_5359 (2016-09-03 19:04:48+00:00): Hello! The pharmacy information is important, too. If have divide the information.
jimthoburn (2016-09-03 19:21:07+00:00): Ah, it looks like you added a point for the pharmacy. Thanks!   :o)
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:17:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-16 19:39:07+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
sheldonelectric (2019-06-18 07:06:22+00:00): No hace falta poner los ofertas de las tiendas.
Solo se pone lo que no cambia de un dia al otro.
Jojo4u (2017-04-02 22:32:47+00:00): Hallo Robomoto, bitte erkläre dein "no bicycles allowed". Es gibt kein Verbotsschild. Benutzungspflicht nur für straßenbegleitende Wege. Diskussion hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/443005
Jacob's-Staff (2016-09-02 08:46:39+00:00): Hmm, auf Bing sehe ich keine der eingetragenen Häuser - was ist also die verwandte Quelle? Auch für die Hausnummern, die sieht man ja definitiv nicht auf den Satellitenbildern. Bitte etwas mehr Infos als standardmäßig "Details ergänzt" zu setzen.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:17:04+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
naoliv (2016-09-05 18:46:04+00:00): I guess that the picnic table isn't named "Pokemon Gym", right? :-)
user_5359 (2016-09-02 16:28:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Peilscheibe (2016-09-02 07:27:58+00:00): Revert of changesets 41856980 and 41857115. Changes weren't discussed with
the local community who is trying to build up the local cycle network
relations in OSM. Additionally, it doesn't seem the guidelines for
automated edits were considered. Prior to such edits please discuss this
with the local community, e.g. the Stuttgart mailinglist.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:16:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2016-09-02 16:05:23+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
Я правильно понимаю, что добавив тег passenger_lines=2, вы хотите обозначить, что Транссиб является двухпутной железной дорогой?
jaimemd (2016-09-02 17:09:07+00:00): Да точно.
There is already a map using this tag: http://product.itoworld.com/map/231?lon=40.90815&lat=50.51702&zoom=7&fullscreen=true
and an english wiki article with more explanation: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:passenger_lines
mavl (2016-09-02 17:36:34+00:00): Проблема в том, что в некоторых местах Транссиб отрисован двумя линиями (путями). Нужно ли в этих местах исправлять значение 2 на 1 и на второй путь тоже ставить 1 (сейчас на втором пути нет этого тега)?
jaimemd (2016-09-02 18:18:30+00:00): Обе пути двухпутной линии должны иметь 2. Я думаю, что не нужно отмечать второй путь. Тег не является обязательным.
The value only depends on how many tracks the line has at this place - not how many tracks are drawn in OSM.
jaimemd (2016-09-02 18:28:07+00:00): If I caused any problem with the data, please tell me the name of the nearest rail station and I will try to fix it.
mavl (2016-09-02 18:40:45+00:00): There are no problem.  
Please, see Zavodoukovskaya Station (Tyumen Oblast) [Заводоуковская].
Derick Rethans (2016-09-02 09:33:21+00:00): Could you please add comments to your changesets?
lcmortensen (2016-09-04 08:05:08+00:00): Sorry, forgot.
letihu (2016-09-14 08:30:07+00:00): Was soll
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440301823/history
darstellen?
Asphaltflechte (2016-09-14 21:26:57+00:00): Das ist ein Wohnmobilstellplatz. Ich hatte die passenden Tags nicht parat.
literan (2016-09-02 11:40:47+00:00): почему вдруг трамвайная линия превратилась в железную дорогу?
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:16:44+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Adib Yz (2016-09-02 08:59:57+00:00): Memorial Tag has been used but there is not memorial on this places.
Владимир К (2016-09-02 12:01:51+00:00): не нужно названия брать в кавычки
Adib Yz (2016-09-02 09:03:23+00:00): Wrong use of Memorial Tag, Adding perosonal addresses to Map.
~Jhellico (2016-09-02 12:05:19+00:00): Точка розміщена в будинку 184 і має addr:housenumber=148 — невірне розміщення чи номер?
~Jhellico (2016-09-02 12:09:24+00:00): Схоже, що номер…
user_5359 (2016-09-02 16:23:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! An Appatment isn’t a hotel: Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house
Beach1212 (2016-09-02 18:50:41+00:00): Thats ok but most have used that as Code so that the reason. So if they also change i gladly follow.
Olyon (2016-09-04 01:24:26+00:00): Pourquoi avoir modifié le golf? les fairway sont devenu des greens? Et les autres tags ajoutés ne servent pas à grand chose.
alexpawlak (2016-09-05 09:54:51+00:00): Désolé, Je voulais juste aider, Je suis nouveau, J'ai peut être fait quelques fautes. désolé.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:16:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Владимир К (2016-09-02 12:01:33+00:00): не нужно писать в название магазина Магазин
Зелёный Кошак (2016-11-13 00:59:42+00:00): У них, в маписьми, сказано, что в name надо вносить, как на вывеске, вот он, бедняга, всё г и тянет в базу. =)
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-09-02 18:08:17+00:00): Не содержит полезной информации
user_5359 (2016-09-02 16:14:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:landuse%3Dreservoir
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:16:15+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
az09 (2016-09-02 10:38:26+00:00): Очень хорошо, откатываю )
literan (2016-09-02 11:54:04+00:00): вы перепутали с Викимапией. В OSM надо присваивать теги, определяющие объект, а не писать словами. Если вы сами не сделаете, я переделаю.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:16:07+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
geow (2016-09-17 15:27:16+00:00): Hallo Relloz, willkommen bei OSM! Warum hast du die Geometrie der Bergwege durch Löschen zahlreicher Knoten stark vereinfacht? In diesem Beispiel hast du mehr als 50% der Knoten gelöscht und damit die Pfadcharakteristik mit zahlreichen Kehren unkenntlich gemacht: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/435877078

Der Erfasser dieser Pfade "rogeo" hat deine unzulässige Vereinfachung inzwischen wieder rückgängig gemacht. 

Die OSM Gemeinschaft würde sich freuen, wenn du künftig solche (sicher gut gemeinten) Änderungen nur auf Grundlage solider eigener Geländekenntnisse und ggf. nach Beteiligung des Ersterfassers durchführen würdest.

Gruß
geow
Relloz (2016-09-18 14:52:16+00:00): Hallo geow, 

stimmt: die Änderungen waren gut gemeint, es tut mir leid, wenn ich damit den Weg verschlechtert habe. Ich bin noch neu in OSM, möchte aber zum Lernen auch aktiv etwas tun. 

Die Kehren oder Serpentinen auf der OSM habe ich weder beim Wandern mit der OSM-Karte (in OsmAnd) so wahrgenommen, noch kann ich sie auf den beiden GPS-Tracks erkennen, die ich aufgezeichnet habe (Garmin Oregon 600 und Samsung Galaxy S4, allerdings beide in der Schlucht von mäßiger Qualität, deshalb habe ich sie nicht hochgeladen), deshalb dachte ich, sie wären "einfach mal so hingemalt". 

Jetzt weiß ich, dass der Weg sehr sorgfältig gemessen und eingezeichnet war und dass es besser ist, den Urheber erst zu kontaktieren. Ich werde in Zukunft vorsichtiger sein.

Gruß

Werner
geow (2016-09-18 15:54:17+00:00): Hallo Werner, danke für die Rückmeldung! Das sieht ja nach einem sehr guten Start aus - erst 50 Changesets und fast alle mit JOSM - super! Der GPS-Gerätepark und dein Verständnis der Möglichkeiten und Grenzen dieser Helferlein passt auch, also steht einer Mapper-Karriere nicht im Weg ;) 

Wenn du noch Tipps zum Einstieg brauchst, schau mal auf diese Seiten:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/help

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap

http://learnosm.org/de/

http://learnosm.org/de/josm/start-josm/

Deutsches Forum, hier wird Einsteigern sehr gern geholfen:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Viel Spaß!
Klaus
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:15:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
luiswoo (2016-09-02 15:36:27+00:00): м-м по 2gis правим положение, я правильно понял?
aharvey (2017-07-11 09:39:15+00:00): I've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4380628789/history to use club=sport rather than shop=sport
aharvey (2017-07-11 09:39:36+00:00): What's https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4380573190 ?
CloCkWeRX (2017-07-12 03:14:21+00:00): I think its better tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station
CloCkWeRX (2017-07-12 03:14:55+00:00): SOme detail on it  - http://www.haveyoursaywilloughby.com.au/gore-hill-exercise-equipment
aharvey (2017-07-12 03:44:15+00:00): I'll do a ground survey to confirm its a fitness station. I thought they might be adding some kind of fitness club which is run there.
Geo-Tobi (2025-03-01 16:37:42+00:00): Hi, du hast hier Access=agricultural gesetzt. Gemeint ist vermutlich vehicle/motor_vehicle=agricultural, je nachdem ob da Vz250 oder Vz260 steht. Kannst du das evtl. korrigieren?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289632454
Albert Stone (2016-11-10 04:09:23+00:00): この街区は再開発中であり、2014年撮影のBing航空画像に写っている建物は、2016年4月の時点で、既に存在しません。2016年4月の現地調査で、これらの建物が存在しないことを確認し、Bing航空画像にも国土地理院地図にも載っていない、新設された歩道を記入してありました。
古い情報(2014年撮影のBing航空画像)に基づいて、新しい情報(現地調査に基づいて書き込んだ歩道)を削除しないでください。
訪れたことのない場所について記入する時は、現地調査に基づく情報を尊重してください。
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:15:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Anonix35 (2016-09-05 11:10:15+00:00): The new 3S Eisgratt II is in construction and mapped just near, so the gondola you have create doesn't existe anymore.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:15:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
sbiribizio (2016-09-03 12:57:20+00:00): Il divieto di svolta in Via di Vittorio e' sbagliato e te l'ho sistemato io.
Via di Vittorio e' un senso unico, quindi e' implicito chi puoi solo andare dritto o svoltare a destra.
Per maggiori info sui divieti e le restrizioni di svolta puoi guardare qui:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Relation:restriction
4nc4n (2016-09-03 13:10:38+00:00): In precedenza la via di VIttorio NON era senso unico (infatti era errata) e l'ho cambiata. Avevo visto la segnalazione di ERRORE prima di fare l'upload ed ho cercato di correggerla, e pensavo di esserci riuscito.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:15:29+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
philippec (2016-09-02 13:17:24+00:00): I prefer not to map these unsafe bicycle stands.
Hjart (2016-09-02 16:14:47+00:00): Du er lidt vel hårdhændet her i et par tilfælde her. Jeg har lige lavet et større rettesæt, hvor jeg bl.a. har tegnet nogle få bygninger og nu kan jeg se du her har slettet en polygon tagget "demolished:building=yes", et af de steder hvor jeg gjorde det. Dette tag har netop til formål at hindre den slags.
AsgerFrank (2016-09-02 18:34:35+00:00): Den tagging er forkert: du har tilbagedøbt "Vestvang" til Prins Henriks Avenue, trods jeg udførligt har angivet min source, der er kommunens vejfastsættelse som ændrer sydhalvdelen af Prins Henriks Avenue til Vestvang.
AsgerFrank (2016-09-02 18:56:59+00:00): Forståeligt ganske vist, når man har været godt kendt i området, men nu har kommunen altså for nylig som sagt ændret navnet.
sba-dk (2016-09-03 15:06:57+00:00): Så er sheriffen der igen, og du har heller ikke ret denne gang. Jeg forstår ikke, hvorfor der skal tagges på den måde, som du siger ”forhindrer den slags”. Det er altså længe siden det fhv. soldaterhjem blev forladt og derefter nedrevet. Nu er den store jordhøj også ved at være fjernet og området er indhegnet som på min seneste rettelse.  Hvis du vil have et billede fra i dag, så sig til. – For resten, hvor deler vi billeder ??
Men jeg kunne selvfølgelig tagge den store gule gravko ??

----

Jeg undrer mig over Asgers bemærkning, ” når man har været godt kendt i området”, men jeg rettede såmænd bare navnet, så det er i overensstemmelse med Lokalavisen fra 30. august d.å. Nu har jeg været forbi, selv om det heldigvis ikke er så tit jeg kommer forbi skadeklinikken, og der er pt intet belæg for at omdøbe vejen.

/sba-dk
Hjart (2016-09-03 18:55:18+00:00): Formålet med tagget "demolished:building=yes" er at gøre efterfølgende bidragsydere opmærksomme på at selvom bygningen stadig er synlig på aktuelle luftfotos, så eksisterer den altså ikke længere. Bemærk at polygoner tagget på denne måde ikke fremtræder som bygninger på de endelige kort, men udelukkende er ment som en "besked" til andre mappere. Bemærk også at jeg ikke har været i lige det område fornylig og derfor ikke var klar over at bygningen var nedrevet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetView og https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapillary er 2 oplagte muligheder for at dele fotos.
Jeg har studeret Mapillary lidt og kan konstatere at der på Jomfrustien er 3 sekvenser, hvorfra stedet kan overskues, dels fra sep-okt 2015 og fra maj dette år. På de første 2 (eks: http://mapillary.com/map/im/fNet5EdnfikUYYj9yjuNwA) kan man stadig se bygningen men ikke den sidste.
AsgerFrank (2016-09-03 22:13:56+00:00): Kendt betyder såmænd bare, at kan man et område godt, er man vel tilbøjelig førsteantagelsen at ændringer er fejl.

Jeg kan nu ikke finde på, hvilke flere dokumentationstyper der skulle til for at fastslå navnet Vestvang for sydlige tidligere PHA, for der er allerede: 
1) Kommunens udstillede navneskift
 http://www.adresse-info.dk/Ark/divadetails.aspx?id=8906 
ikrafttrædende 1.3.2016;
2) De hosliggende sygehusbygninger med adressepunkter Vestvang; 
3) Kommunens dig. kort der siger Vestvang, selvom jeg ikke ved om vi må læse derfra;
4) skiltet "Vestvang" i sydligste ende af tidligere PHA, som står på stien til Du Platsgade; 
5) skiltet "Vestvang" der før har stået i nordligste ende af tidligere PHA for enden af dobbeltvejen Nordvang, der hvor der nu graves til den nye vej til havnen, og hvor der nu ligger samlet en bunke med 3 skilte Vestvang/Prins Henriks Avenue/Nordvang, jeg med fryd faldt over ved gen-kig i eftermiddags.
---
Lokalavisens skitse fra kommunen om den nye vej til havnen siger ganske vist PHA, men de kan lave fejl, og er af og til bagefter. 
Skærmkortet siger PHA, men er altid bagefter.
Hjart (2016-09-10 07:42:58+00:00): Ok, jeg var forbi forleden for ved selvsyn at besigtige stedet: http://mapillary.com/map/im/QcGLAf_Qh7i5ZBtUv5xRrQ. Jeg var også forbi Hønekilden: http://mapillary.com/map/im/qs-2cJHI_nGg6qwEtorf3A
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-09-02 14:19:10+00:00): Dlaczego został usunięty węzeł ze Środmieściem? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3009670214/history
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:15:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Riccardo Stagni (2016-09-06 11:55:30+00:00): Ciao,
attento che con questo commit hai creato due strade sovrapposte, una secondary "Via Giacomo Aroldi" e una residential "Via XX Settembre".
Riccardo Stagni (2016-09-06 12:08:52+00:00): Ho fatto invia troppo presto :)
Qual'è il nome giusto? (come tag è corretta la secondary visto che è una provinciale e gli altri tratti adiacenti sono secondary)
user_5359 (2016-09-02 16:04:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Olga | Yanosik (2016-09-06 12:17:34+00:00): Czy coś się tu dzieje? Na dwóch fragmentach dróg jest ustawiony end_date, czy dotyczy to jakiś prac budowlanych w tym miejscu?
highflyer74 (2016-09-05 10:43:18+00:00): Hello!

Can you please check this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439798318. What does heeee=6 mean?

All the best,

Oliver
user_367191 (2016-09-05 09:48:24+00:00): User wurde per PM auf möglichen Fehler hingewiesen.
Владимир К (2016-09-22 14:15:22+00:00): что за семнадцатый" дом?
Владимир К (2016-09-26 06:57:33+00:00): что за бухаловка?