piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2018-08-22 12:55:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Protoxenus (2018-08-28 12:25:52+00:00): Hallo, 
dass du den neuen Fußweg/Fahrradweg eingezeichnet hast, finde ich ja in Ordnung. Aber verläuft dieser durch die dort vorhandenen Gebäude? Ich kann es mir nicht vorstellen. Ein bisschen mehr Genauigkeit wäre angebracht.
Gruß Protoxenus
wellmer (2018-08-28 13:31:57+00:00): Lieber Protoxenus! Ja, Du hast völlig Recht! Das hat mich auch schon geärgert. Aber ich wollte den Weg jetzt erstmal eintragen, Habe auch schon Kontakt mit Matthias Meisser wegen des weiteren Vorgehens aufgenommen. Ich gehe davon aus, dass das Gebäude abgerissen wurde, wollte es aber nicht einfach aus der Karte nehmen, ohne nochmal da gewesen zu sein und ein paar Photos gemacht zu haben. Vielleicht ist ja auch die sonstige Gebäudesituation dort schon geändert. Aber man kann jetzt wenigstens schon mal dort navigieren, auch wenn das mit dem Gebäude Unsinn ist. Liebe Gruesse! Wilfried
Protoxenus (2018-08-28 17:57:04+00:00): Kannst die Füße still halten. Ich war heute mal gucken und habe die Gebäude aus der DB genommen.
Gruß Protoxenus
frosm (2024-12-13 07:34:35+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/618612496
c'est quoi ? un sentier difficile qui mériterait un sac_scale et mtb:scale
ou bien c'est un escalier ?
dans ce cas cela ne me semble pas être "conçu pour les chevaux" et surement pas interdit aux piétons, il y a même un itinéraire qui passe par là
H@mlet (2025-01-06 11:45:48+00:00): Bonjour,
de mémoire (je n'y suis pas retourné depuis), c'était une descente en terre bien raide, quasi verticale, je suppose orientée VTT, mais bien casse-gueule même à pied.
Je ne sais plus du tout pourquoi j'ai laissé horse=designated, peut-être qu'il y a un marquage sur site, je ne suis pas cavalier, mais je doute que ce soit prudent d'essayer de passer par là !
Pour l'itinéraire (pas celui VTT qui fait à peu près sens), je ne sais pas, probablement une erreur.
Je trouve étonnant que vous envoyiez des utilisateurs dans cette galère sans jamais vérifier sur le terrain. Ce passage est vraiment impossible à pied (sauf grimpeur) et en vélo (sauf bon VTT en descente). C'est ce que j'essayais d'exprimer avec "steps" et "foot=no".
Si vous tenez vraiment à prendre la responsabilité de ce tracé, je vous conseillerais plutôt de le supprimer, ou de le bloquer complètement (access=no ?).
Cordialement.
pangoSE (2018-08-21 20:04:10+00:00): error in desc. s/strait/bay
frosm (2018-08-21 20:52:30+00:00): bonjour et bienvenu sur openstreetmap
n'hésitez pas à ajouter le tag théatre ou salle de spectable afin de rendre le lieu accessible aux recherches par theme.
de meme il serrait utile de le positionner au bo endroit si celui ci ne se fait pas en pleine rue
Polarbear (2018-10-07 18:24:20+00:00): Dear Niels Elgaard Larsen,
I just fixed a navigation error you introduced by splitting the A13 motorway and looping it as a closed way 618620118 on itself.
 
May I ask what the source is for the new maxspeed you introduced? Cannot find anything related in "digitalfrihed.dk".
 
I checked mapillary imagery taken 2018-08-07, which shows a sign "120 bei Nässe" (when wet), which we do not tag as a regular maxspeed. Did you have any other observations?
 
It might be helpful to give more specific changeset descriptions when working on major infrastructure objects.

thanks
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2018-10-08 19:11:56+00:00): My source is mostly Mapillary, I contributed images for this stretch of the road. I apologize if I missed the Nasse note.

I do not think that I looped it onto itself. I found two or tree other places where A13 was looped onto itself and removed those loops. Maybe I missed one loop.
Polarbear (2018-10-08 21:11:09+00:00): Thanks for explaining, and no worries, all fixed. 
Have a look at version 1 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/618620118/history where you see the same node at the beginning and end of the way, this is a closed way. 
I noticed when OsmAnd suddenly announced a roundabout on the motorway :-)
marc__marc (2022-07-20 22:11:18+00:00): Hello,
can you please put a note where you think it's a farmland for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61625085 ?
Regards,
Marc
frosm (2020-04-01 10:17:15+00:00): Bonjour,
"Observations personnelles" se dit "source=survey" :)
sur les POI, c'est même plus pratique de mettre survey:data=* afin de géré les inévitables multiples sources.
Bonne continuation
osmeh (2018-09-22 19:23:44+00:00): Hi, great to see you're woking on improving the map in Imereti. 

I'm just wondering - did you change all the highway=road tags to highway=residential? What was the reason/basis for this? It surely wasn't local knowledge as some of those highways definitely aren't residential, but just some cattle tracks or narrow paths along a ridge. This can seriously mess up navigation. I was hiking on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538295134 today and nearly got lost because I was expecting a residential road. I changed this one to path now, but many others surely remain. If someone was acutally driving a vehicle there, there would be no way for them to get out. 

I'd kindly like to ask you to be more careful with such blanket edits in the future.
osmeh (2018-09-22 19:27:50+00:00): The same goes for the northern Vertkvichala area - do you really know which of those roads are residential and which are just paths for cattle? I surely can't make it out from the aerial images, which is why I classified them as highway=road. Have you been there?
TheJAwesome1 (2018-09-24 19:03:33+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for the feedback! And sorry for any trouble this may have caused. I was going off OSM policy and saw that the road was untagged and I had changed them to residential because that looked to be consistent with the other areas around Georgia that I have seen. I see your point changing them to path and I will be sure to keep that in mind in the future, thanks.
JJIglesias (2018-08-22 00:17:13+00:00): Para cambiar las caracteristicas de una via NO SE LA BORRA y se dibuja una nueva, por favor leer: 
http://learnosm.org/es/
Antes de seguir editando INCORRECTAMENTE...
thomas hermant (2018-08-25 22:38:54+00:00):  Hola, 

Gracias por vos consejos, disculpa las molestias, espero que no sea muy importante.
mueschel (2018-08-22 17:40:34+00:00): Hi,
I saw you added several tags like "compartment:(E)" - it's uncommon to have parentheses in keys and other people used tags like "compartment:SW" before. Could you have a look and change these?

Jan
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-15 01:17:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/618640367

is it road closed to all access? Private one? Allowing foot/bicycle traffic and banning motor vehicles?

can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4384119 ?
lcmortensen (2018-10-08 11:39:17+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset 63307642. The motorway was widened from 2 to 3 lanes southbound in May 2017 (see https://www.nzta.govt.nz/projects/southern-corridor-improvements/)
Frozone (2018-10-09 18:36:34+00:00): Thank you catching that for me. I have switched to updated imagery so this should not be a problem again.
literan (2018-08-22 12:33:03+00:00): перед с (строение) обязателен пробел. Исправлю
Sergei Morozov (2018-08-22 13:10:30+00:00): понял, спасибо.
viloan (2018-08-21 23:08:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-08-21 23:22:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
TheSwavu (2018-08-22 01:53:15+00:00): Hi,

Please don't delete other mapper's work. These tracks are still visible on satellite imagery from two days ago.

Thank you.

I have reverted this changeset.
ahhok (2018-08-22 10:54:45+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, I'm still learning the boundaries here. I thought the private roads weren't appropriate according to the OSM tutorial examples. I won't do this again :)
GinaroZ (2018-08-22 10:10:07+00:00): It's still set as access=no, if it's fully open then that should be removed.
Frans S (2018-08-26 12:52:45+00:00): Hi,
I ran a validation (in JOSM) and found a number of errors, variing from buildings crossing highways and overlapping buildings. Solved
Best regards
Carnildo (2018-08-22 09:22:07+00:00): When you're editing a roundabout, make sure you don't connect an entrance road directly to an exit road.  That creates a "short circuit" and causes routing software to give incorrect instructions.

For example, with the "4th Avenue" entrance connected directly to the "West Marie Street" exit, a router will ignore the roundabout entirely; the curve is gentle enough that it might not give any instructions at all.  With the two separated, it will give instructions such as "take the first exit from the roundabout".
naoliv (2018-08-22 00:19:32+00:00): 👌
trigpoint (2018-08-23 17:21:59+00:00): Hi, thank you for your addition however it is a little incorrect.
Firstly the name tag should only be used on objects that have an actual name. They should not be used as a place to put a description.
The correct way to tag a barrier is barrier=*. Is this really a swing gate?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dswing_gate
The usual barriers we use on rights of way are stile, kissing_gate and gate.
Cheers Phil
mueschel (2018-08-31 16:08:43+00:00): Hi, 
could you explain the meaning of 'treadmill=yes'? This tag is not used anywhere else.

Thanks,
Jan
Supaplex (2019-02-07 03:00:06+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Frans S (2018-08-31 07:55:06+00:00): Hi Brian. Good mapping. Just a remark
don't follow the outline of trees when mapping buildings and can imagine that the building is partly hidden by trees.
Thank you en enjoy mapping
SomeoneElse (2026-02-05 20:53:25+00:00): What exactly is a "route=administrative"?  I'm looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1549115/history and am confused...
MacLondon (2026-02-10 23:22:43+00:00): The LCN+ links in London were continuous (numbered) corridors that were used to plan the entire intended cycle network in London. These included existing + aspirational alignments for cycle routes. Numbering would change whenever a line crossed a borough boundary.

The idea for these links was that individual boroughs could strategise long term towards delivering missing sections of the cycle network and ensure that neighbouring boroughs were 'singing from the same hymn sheet'. The forward planning could include e.g. that future buildings might need to have an arch to enable a cycle route.

The numbering used was completely separate to actual cycle route numbers and was never meant to be used on any route signs but was basically for 'administrative' purposes.

However the LCN+ links that did get mapped on OSM were initially wrongly tagged as being actual lcn cycle routes, with numbers like +166 and +205.
SomeoneElse (2026-02-12 21:28:51+00:00): Ah - thanks for that.
dbaron (2018-08-31 23:37:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62187445 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 61875241 and 61875271 which realigned the highway to out-of-date imagery.
dbaron (2018-08-31 23:41:18+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62187445 because it realigned the road to imagery that's years out-of-date rather than the new post-landslide path.
dbaron (2018-08-31 23:37:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62187445 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 61875241 and 61875271 which realigned the highway to out-of-date imagery.
mavl (2018-08-22 15:46:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение данных.  
  
Есть небольшая проблема в том, что названия улиц в России принято [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3] указывать полностью, например «Береговая улица» вместо «Береговая». Я добавил слово «улица» в название. Также для адресного поиска необходимо, чтобы существовала улица с названием (тег name), которое совпадает с названием улицы в адресе дома (тег addr:street). Такой улицы не было и я добавил название «Береговая улица» на ближайшую улицу к этому дому.
kartonage (2018-08-22 14:09:08+00:00): Hey toabctl and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

In this changeset you have added the tag "ford=yes" to Im Lichtenhain. Considering the area that's a bit improbable. I suppose this was by accident?

Best regards
viloan (2018-08-22 06:18:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
newpavlov (2018-08-24 21:09:44+00:00): Приветствую!

По текущему соглашению (см. форум) для улучшения машиночитаемости названия подстанций указываются без префиксов и напряжений, в случае нестандартных префиксов используется тег official_short_type. Посему 	ПС Буинск и ПС Ибреси возвращены к старым названиям.
abakus_uploader (2018-08-22 22:30:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
atcomapper (2018-08-22 06:59:18+00:00): Undlad venligst at slette adressepunkter. En adresse kan sagtens fortsætte med at eksistere selvom bygningen er revet ned. Alle danske adresser opdateres automatisk via Danmarks Adresseregister.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:11:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2018-09-02 19:35:06+00:00): Het ziet er allemaal keurig en precies  uit, maar je mag echt geen landuse als grass aan de gebouwen vastplakken. Altijd de landuse loshouden van wegen en gebouwen. Je krijgt anderes schade als een andere mapper gaat schuiven. ...alles komt mee. 
Graag reactie
eggie (2018-09-02 19:38:00+00:00): De landuse heb ik losgemaakt van bebouwing.
mike_russ (2018-08-22 09:23:20+00:00): błędny opis-powinno być: uzupełnienie biegu strumienia (odcinek nieskanalizowany).
RicoElectrico (2018-08-26 20:44:58+00:00): Cześć,

Czy ta ulica na pewno tak przebiega? Nie udało mi się znaleźć aktualnych zdjęć satelitarnych, ale wg tej strony: http://orneta.e-mapa.net biegnie trochę inaczej, bardziej na ukos. Jest to zgodne z prawdą, czy to tylko urzędowe plany?

Inną rzeczą jest klasa - bardziej pasowałoby highway=residential, jeśli to jest droga wokół domów jak inne obok, albo highway=track ("droga polna lub leśna") gdy to droga prowadząca na pole, nie do domów.
Nakaner-repair (2018-08-22 07:43:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 61846357, 61846490, 61846656, 61846747, 61846789, 61846871.
neoLithos (2018-08-28 11:17:26+00:00): Hallo Chris.

Ich war vor zwei Wochen in Rodersdorf.
Bei folgendem Haus
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565481299
stimmt die Hausnummer zwar, die Straße aber nicht (Hausnummer mit Straße am Briefkasten). Sie muss "Am Dorfplatz" lauten.

Kannst du bitte noch zu allen Hausnummern die Postleitzahl 08538 hinzufügen.

Viele Grüße aus dem Vogtland, Frank.
neoLithos (2018-08-28 11:37:10+00:00): Hallo Chris.
Mir ist noch ein Fehler aufgefallen. Das Haus hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565481298
gehört laut meinen Aufzeichnungen zu der Straße "Schulberg", ersichtlich durch die Einfahrt von der Seite aus.
Viele Grüße, Frank.
chris66 (2018-08-28 15:36:54+00:00): erledigt.
RoterEmil (2018-09-04 23:48:52+00:00): Hallo, mit diesem Änderungssatz wurden Angaben für die Berliner Karwendelstraße gemacht. Die Firma scheint aber in München ansässig zu sein. Deshalb habe ich die hiesigen Angaben nun wieder gelöscht. Weiterhin sind bereits vorhandene Werte wie "building:levels=*" nicht zu löschen!! Das sind alles Angaben, die andere User mit teils viel Zeitaufwand ergänzt haben. Ich habe die "building:levels"-Angaben nun wieder hergestellt. Bitte zukünftig sorgfältiger Daten ergänzen. Danke und schöne Grüße :)
corfede (2018-08-31 07:07:58+00:00): The stadium was mapped correctly with the multipolygon relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5719245. You created a new stadium inside, adding tags to the grandstand building, removing the building itself. In addition you have moved the soccer pitch and the athletic track following the shifted Bing sat photos. I restored the previous situation, keeping the name you added "Stadio Ettore Giardiniero - Via del Mare". Thanks, Federico.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:11:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:11:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
JandaM (2018-11-05 08:43:57+00:00): Dobry den,
  jen upozorneni mimo vasi editaci. Prosim jako podklad pro obrysy nepouzivejte Bing - ortofoto je posunute a nelze se spravne srovnat.
  Jinak zmena tagovani building=yes na leisure=stadium je chybna. Spravne tagovani ma byt building:part=yes a leisure=stadium ma byt na cele budove (coz je). Dekuji za vasi snahu. 
Martin
kartonage (2018-08-30 16:44:02+00:00): Hallo Ebi1953 und willkommen bei OSM! Du hast ein Review angefordert.
//
Ich könnte jetzt ein wenig über die einzelnen Änderungen im Detail schreiben, aber ich denke du wolltest eigentlich darauf hinaus, dass hier gerade eine Baustelle ist und der Weg deswegen nichtmehr existiert. Gebaut wird ein Haus, richtig? In so einem Fall reicht es dann auch oft eine Baustellenfläche einzuzeichnen. Falls nicht kann man den Weg auch löschen, wenn er tatsächlich durch eine  Hausbebauung zurückgebaut wurde bzw. es so anpassen wie es nur noch vorhanden ist. Jetzt ist hier jedenfalls eine Linie drin ohne Nutzen. Das Haus hat auch nur 0 Geschosse, weswegen ich überhaupt erst auf die Idee gekommen bin, dass es noch eine Baustelle ist. Vielleicht schaust du ja nochmal drüber. :)
//
Wenn du Lust hast dich noch mehr in OSM einzubinden, kann ich dir folgendes Tutorial (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/file:Osm-tutorial.pdf) ans Herz legen. Ein Blick ins Wiki schadet auch nie (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite) und hilft einem schnell auf die Sprünge bestimmte Dinge richtig einzutragen.
//
Falls du Fragen hast, gern nachhaken. Ansonsten happy mapping!
mavl (2019-07-21 10:11:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
opendcc (2019-09-02 06:40:13+00:00): Hello,

a track and 0.6 width? actually, there is a note ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1906855#map=17/47.60343/12.00036&layers=N ) complaining about a wrong routing due to this mapping ...

Please be careful with tagging of ways, thanks.
freebeer (2018-09-06 20:15:10+00:00): Dobrý večer,
How did you come up with an all-uppercase name for Letná, opposed to the previous mixed-case?
Unlike EA, I have never seen Generali, which is not an acronym, written in all-caps.  In fact, none of the references I've found for the firm, this field, or the similarly-named field in Wien, list it in other than mixed-case, which is what is preferred in OSM, apart from acronyms.
(Yes, I know about exceptions like a mass-edit to ALDI)
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-06 20:31:15+00:00): It is the official writing style of the stadium. Here you can see it for example, at the official site of tenants Sparta: https://sparta.cz/cs/klub/generali-arena/