piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner-repair (2024-02-27 16:48:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147981370 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by scorpion121 (unnamed apartments added using MAPS.ME, very likely personal notes, some already deleted by other mappers).
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-10 23:42:16+00:00): Why you keep moving this node around? What you want to achieve?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8308861015/history
Karthoo (2021-01-30 08:30:47+00:00): Hallo, welchen Vorteil siehst du darin jedes Gebäude so zu nennen? In operator= steht ja überall schon drin, dass sie zu Schaeffler gehören. Ich würde den Gebäuden höchstens Namen wie "Halle 1" oder "Pforte" geben.
mmenzer (2021-02-02 14:11:29+00:00): Es scheint mir im Sinne des name-Attributs zu sein. Der Operator wird ja normalerweise nicht angezeigt.
PT-53 (2021-02-02 14:57:32+00:00): Hallo,
wenn jetzt jemand nach Schaeffler Automotve ...  sucht, bekommt er 16 (?) Treffer. Welcher Treffer ist der richtige?
Vorschlag: 
Betriebsgelände einzeichnen und mit 
man_made=works
product=*
name= Schaeffler Automotive ..
addr:city=*
addr:*=*
operater=*
phone=.....
etc. versehen und Name und Operater an den Gebäuden wieder löschen.
Grüße
Karthoo (2021-02-03 17:20:57+00:00): Habe das mal so umgesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98658153
Viele Grüße
PT-53 (2021-02-04 08:02:39+00:00): Wäre da nicht 
type=site
passender ?
Grüße
Karthoo (2021-02-04 16:30:13+00:00): Hmm, weiß ich nicht, habe das Tag noch nie verwendet. Akzeptieren das denn die Renderer?
mueschel (2021-01-10 18:01:36+00:00): This edit looks better than the last ones. 
However:
- ways must be connected to each other to be usable in routing.
- please don't ignore warnings and errors from the validator. Fix them before uploading your changes.
- "486 Rascino-Monte Nuria" is not the name of any of the tracks on the map. It's the name of the relation - and it should only appear there, but not on the ways.
eggie (2021-01-10 16:57:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Revioew.. Welk bord staat er vooraan.
Je hebt het nu getagd als fietspad.

Niemand mag er komen want je tagt Verboden toegang met access=no
Verder tag je oneway=yes  Dus die fietsers mogemn maar één kant uit? 

Ruiters mogen niet op een fietspad komen. 
motor_vehicle=no hoeft niet op een fietspad. Het houdt ook moped en mofa tegen.
Dus welk bord en welke status heeft de weg.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=97255629
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-10 17:00:36+00:00): Elk begin is moeilijk. access=no hoort hier niet.

motor_vehicle=no is default .. dus verwijderen die regel.
Mogen er wel brommers en snorfietsen langs dan moped=yes en mofa=yes toevoegen.

Kijk je nog even?

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=97256005

MVG
eggie
messpert (2021-05-21 20:01:13+00:00): One problem is that you have added the tag for a bank on a building when there is already a node for the bank. In this case Barclays Bank. I happen to have originally mapped both the bank (as a node) and the building. I included the name of the building as Barclays bank, but did not add the amenity=bank as a tag. That belongs on the node. They are logically separate. The building might change use, even if we were sure that the building was used exclusively as a bank.

I think that you may have done similar things in other places around Liskeard.
The same holds for shops and the like.
eggie (2021-01-10 17:02:03+00:00): Zoek eens in de wiki op hoe je een paaltje tagt.

Zelfde verhaal als voorgaande changeset
Dus access=no en motor_vehicle=no verwijderen
moped en mofa=yes toevoegen. 
Je edits
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-10 17:47:20+00:00): Hier is een probleem Er lopen fietsroutes

Dat moet je net maar weten. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97256669#map=19/51.92112/6.09077&layers=C
Die kun je niet zomaar onderbreken. Eerst zullen de fietsroutes verlegd moeten worden 34 -52
Wanneer iets een wandelpad wordt zullen de tags ook aangepast moeten worden.
Ik draai deze changeset denk ik even terug om de fietsroutes aan te passen. 
Met een simpele editor als iD kun je overigens geen fietsroutes bewerken.
Met JOSM en een brok ervaring kan dat weer wel.  
Even niet mappen hier.
Ik kijk eerst even met de editor JOSM. 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2021-01-10 17:50:40+00:00): Hoogstwaarschijnlijk is de fietsrouteexpert de zaak aan het herstellen, want ik krijg een conflict bij de revert. Ik kijk zo even.  Even niet mappen hier voordat het wordt vrijgegeven.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-01-10 17:58:33+00:00): reverted by changeset #97258478
eggie (2021-01-10 18:08:32+00:00): Je was zelf bezig. Daardoor een conflict. De fietsroute is hersteld en je oude G7 tagging is weer terug. 
Wanneer je op de fietslayer kijkt zie je de fietsroutes lopen, maar er zijn o.a. ook OV en wandelroutes. het is dus oppassen geblazen in het begin. 
Vraag hulp op het forum als je die situaties tegenkomt en schakel snel over in zulke gevallen naar editor JOSM
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       


Mapse,
eggie
Frans S (2021-01-11 15:26:11+00:00): Hello. In addition to my previous message, Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings or highways
Thanks
AlexNcUa (2021-05-14 00:24:25+00:00): Доброго дня, підкажіть будь ласка, ви дійсно впевнені що ці камери є камерами контролю швидкості? 
Судячи з цьго знимку https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.27024145615219&lng=24.62519617753534&z=17&pKey=hUlOOvteqCJClf409A66qj&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap
вони більш схожі на камери відеоспостереження, і якщо так, то буде краще їх замапити як man_made: surveillance.

Камери автоматичного контролю швидкості зазвичай віглядають наступним чином https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=o6Fmx8FsthsTHfRPAWawan&lat=50.418483200003635&lng=29.835100500799967&z=17
Профі (2021-05-17 13:31:54+00:00): Це звичайні камери, але трохи дальше, за знаком Бурштин встановлена повноцінна рамка із камерами автоматичної фіксації.
AlexNcUa (2021-05-18 18:29:03+00:00): Дуже дякую. Рамку знайшов, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.27699911412716&lng=24.620180362858456&z=17&pKey=hLWFoMCyRxeAn2zbwa5SC1 але на знимках за лютий камери ще не встановлені, скоріш за все трохи пізніше встановили. Судячи з рамки та слідів на поверхні асфальту більш ймовірно що це будуть камери вагового контролю на зразок https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.15386149997222&lng=28.65103309997222&z=17&pKey=cGNuBrRmI4nqdcLd4F1K49&dateFrom=2021-03-01&focus=photo Не впевнений, чи мають вони також функцію контролю швидкості.
Frans S (2021-01-11 11:58:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
E: Buildings not squared
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97256924
mueschel (2021-01-12 15:12:04+00:00): Bitte checke diesen Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28218972
Da hat es den Tag taxi=yes=no
rupertvdk (2021-01-12 15:25:00+00:00): Dankesehr, das war wohl ein kleiner JOSM-Fehler den ich nicht mehr bemerkt habe! Wird sofort geändert!
Dino Michelini (2021-01-10 19:19:26+00:00): I nomi non vanno scritti in maiuscolo fai riferimento alla wiki di OSM key:name (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:name). Stesso discorso vale per il changeset 97256712 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97256712). Per favore correggi i nomi.
Dino Michelini (2021-01-10 19:23:32+00:00): anche per i changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97256992, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97247646, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97247968
blackboxlogic (2021-01-10 18:16:58+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding buildings. In 2020, I added all the address nodes in Maine, but the buildings you're adding are much better. Any time you add a building, consider merging it with the address node so the node is gone and the address details are on the building. Please ask if you have questions. - Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97257074
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 10:36:38+00:00): Ciao ho visto che stai mappando alcuni percorsi CAI in questa zona. Ti segnalo alcune imprecisioni nelle key utilizzate (fai riferimento a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI) Nella route che hai creato "CAI 624" il name non va messo (il name si mette solo se esiste ad es. Sentiero Frassati); in from non serve scrivere Sora è sufficiente  Convento dei Passionisti se è stato mappato idem con to (sufficiente Prato di Campoli se mappato); il rwn:name non è corretto va messo "Rete Escurionistica del Lazio (RCL)" (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/REI#Esempi_codifica_relazioni); symbol lo si inserisce solo se il percorso è interamente segnato; state si riferisce allo stato del percorso (chiuso, ...) al suo posto va messo website. Per favore ricontrolla le relazioni create. Grazie
eggie (2021-01-10 17:41:34+00:00): Deze link is wel handig om te bewaren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

Dus way 	motor_vehicle=no & motorcycle=yes & moped=yes & mofa=yes & traffic_sign=NL:C6
Dus dat klopt.
foot en bicycle=yes is default. Dat hoeft niet. 
name=Sluis voor bouwverkeer  moet weg.
Geen nametags gebruiken om iets te duiden. 
Dat kun je wel onder description=  zetten

Op de bus_trap  zou je nog wel accesstags kunnen zetten voor wie daar langs mag. Zeker die motorcycle=yes en moped en mofa

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
Janith96 (2021-01-11 07:22:04+00:00): Since the roads are not that visible in the satellite view, you can verify the changes by looking at the roads in this area in google maps platform.
eggie (2021-01-10 17:43:05+00:00): Yep.. oke.. Wanneer motorcycle=yes is toegestaan zou je het nog kunnen aanpassen.
gr eggie
tux67 (2021-01-11 07:20:21+00:00): Hallo maxmichels,

ein Chageset ohne Titel/Konnentar UND ohne Quellenangabe - nicht dein Ernst, oder?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97257475
eggie (2021-01-10 17:51:15+00:00): Oke zo
Cartographer10 (2021-01-10 19:04:17+00:00): Thank you for this quick fix.
woodpeck (2021-04-25 23:18:16+00:00): The motorways you have added in this changeset are certainly not motorways in reality. Can you have a look and fix the mistake?
Syl (2021-03-01 15:11:35+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de supprimer cet hôpital vu qu'il n'existe plus (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Ne_cartographiez_pas_des_.C3.A9v.C3.A8nements_historiques_ou_des_.C3.A9l.C3.A9ments_qui_n.27existent_plus).
WingardiumMapiosa (2021-02-11 19:58:38+00:00): Hi pppetros, I noticed that the Aegean Sea (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4594226) was recently changed by you from place=sea to place=islet. 

This appears to be incorrect (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsea, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dislet). 

Would it be possible to change the tag back? Let me know if you would like me to make the fix, thanks! 

Automatic Translation:
Γεια σας pppetros, παρατήρησα ότι το Αιγαίο Πέλαγος (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4594226) άλλαξε πρόσφατα από εσάς από place = sea σε place = νησάκι.

Αυτό φαίνεται να είναι λανθασμένο (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsea, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dislet).

Θα ήταν δυνατή η αλλαγή της ετικέτας; Επιτρέψτε μου να ξέρω αν θέλετε να διορθώσω, ευχαριστώ!
dgitto (2021-01-11 02:42:15+00:00): Il sentiero Castello non è connesso al resto della rete viaria. Bisogna connetterlo da qualche parte, altrimenti è irragiungibile
dgitto (2021-01-11 02:42:40+00:00): ok ho corretto io il museo
eggie (2021-01-10 17:54:28+00:00): Op zich wel goed... , maar de knooppuntfietsroute is beschadigd.. Dus even niet mappen op de rotonde.
Die routes zijn essentieel voor de fietsroutering.
eggie (2021-01-10 17:57:35+00:00): reverted by changeset  #97258450
eggie (2021-01-10 18:25:53+00:00): Je kunt weer mappen...  fietsroute hier ook hersteld
user_5359 (2021-01-11 18:48:53+00:00): Hello, please have look on my correction of the https://www.osm.org/node/2405532175/history
datendelphin (2021-01-16 09:22:45+00:00): Hallo Nirox

Du hast hier die Gemeindegrenze ausversehen etwas verschoben und Objekte damit verknüoft. Achte bitte darauf, keine Objekte mit der Grenze zu verknüpfen. Wenn schon welche ausversehen verknüpft sind (wie hier auch) dann können oder sollten diese wieder getrennt werden.

Gutes mappen
Michael
Nirox (2021-01-16 10:15:25+00:00): Lieber Michael

Da war wohl keine Absicht dabei. Ich werde das künftig berücksichtigen, merci für den Tipp!

Liebe Grüsse
David
03142 (2021-01-10 18:00:59+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Golpayegan+%DA%AF%D9%84%D9%BE%D8%A7%D9%8A%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%AD/Isfahan+%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%AD/@33.1086419,50.7046702,9.66z/data=!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x3f94df1592b9945f:0xdf54bbef714ee14f!2m2!1d5


https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Khansar+%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B1%E2%80%AD/Isfahan+%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%AD/@33.196187,50.2219212,9.66z/data=!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x3f953dd629f25cf3:0x91d95b2a82554e48!2m2!1d50.3172249


https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Alavijeh+%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AC%D9%87%E2%80%AD/Isfahan+%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%AD/@33.0093186,50.7865807,9.66z/data=!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x3fbe1ebaa6957f13:0x5059e7e3e11a2453!2m2!1d51.0697274!2d33



https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Alavijeh+%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AC%D9%87%E2%80%AD/Najafabad+%D9%86%D8%AC%D9%81%E2%80%8C+%D8%A2%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AF%E2%80%AD/@32.8984194,50.9144641,9.92z/data=!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x3fbe1ebaa6957f13:0x5059e7e3e11a2453!2m2
many852123 (2021-01-14 15:32:23+00:00): Google data is not valid on the osm map and should not be used by Google.
pro ludo (2021-01-10 18:16:21+00:00): Why are you changing the solar tags? power=generator is globally very common and still the JOSM preset.
Hamhock666 (2021-01-11 15:47:07+00:00): I was going based on the wiki, which seems to say the area should be tagged as `power=plant`, and the panels as `power=generator`: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source%3Dsolar

If this is not true, then perhaps the wiki should be changed? I am not sure now.
redd (2022-09-01 10:24:34+00:00): Bonjour florian_g,
thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. I hope you understand english language. What means the value of roof:shape=ungabled? That isn't documented yet anywhere on Building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894001521
May you have another look at common used values at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/roof:shape#values ?
Thanks,
redd
eggie (2021-01-10 19:51:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
OrDal (2021-01-10 19:09:10+00:00): Hi, Well done for this changeset (and others). Great work.

Yet I have a question: While changing most of the place=suburb tags to place=neighbourhood (which is Good), you have changed tags of 2 neighbourhoods in Ashkelon from place=neighbourhood to place=suburb . Was it mistake?

Also, a little fix needed: אפרידר neighbourhood in Ashkelon should be أفريدار in arabic and not أفيدار .
NFZANMNIM (2021-01-10 19:28:16+00:00): Hey

Oh sorry about that. Thanks for the fix.

And, well Ashkelon is your city, so correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding was that Afridar and Migdal are more noticeable and more well known than other smaller "neighborhood names".

What I found is that Ashkelon was originally created in 1950s by combining the older Migdal with the newer Afridar, and these two areas have a longer history and a more distinct identity to be worthy of being labeled "suburb".

OSM defines suburb as  "Use place=suburb to identify a major area in a place=town or place=city with a distinct and recognised local name and identity".

This, in my opinion matched these two areas of Ashkelon.

What's your thought?
OrDal (2021-01-10 19:53:07+00:00): Oh, well done for the research! You are right about the history of the city, however, Migdal and Afridar are considered nowadays neighborhoods like the rest. (Although Afridar is considered a well-kept neighborhood, the residents still do not considering it more important than the other neighborhoods. Migdal unfortunately is not so well-maintained nowadays).

I must point out that it is a nice idea to highlight the history of the two neighborhoods, but I also think that for uniformity it is better to keep all the neighborhoods with the same tagging.
NFZANMNIM (2021-01-10 20:42:32+00:00): Yeah that's a good idea, keeping uniformity in the whole city. 

Just one quick question. I don't know how useful or official this map can be, but what do you think? They use two colors, blue for a larger part of city, and red for smaller neighborhoods in those areas. Do you think the hierarchy is accurate?

Migdal, Afridar, Shimshon, Giv3at Tziyon, Barna3 (suburb)

Everything else (neighborhood)

http://ontheworldmap.com/israel/city/ashkelon/ashkelon-tourist-map.jpg
OrDal (2021-01-10 21:02:30+00:00): In the first city plan, the city was planned to have 5 neighborhood (in the city symbol you can see 5 stars represent the five neighborhood). The municipality of Ashkelon has preserved this division in the maps it has published, but in practice (even in the way the municipality operates) this division no longer has meaning.

By the way, this map's origin is http://www.ashkelon.muni.il/SiteCollectionDocuments/ashkelonint.pdf
NFZANMNIM (2021-01-10 21:12:27+00:00): I see. Thank you for explaining this background, and the meaning of 5 stars on city logo. 

This explains then, you're right, keeping everything as neighborhoods makes most sense. 

I'll fix this and the spelling of Afridar later tonight or early tomorrow.
OrDal (2021-01-10 21:15:16+00:00): Ok, well done and good night.
abrensch (2021-04-07 12:20:47+00:00): Hallo FanTasMo,

diese Sperre hier (vehicle=no) sieht nicht plausibel aus:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25974153

Kannst Du das mal anschauen?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
FanTasMo (2021-08-29 07:56:49+00:00): Moin Arndt,

doch, das ist schon richtig so.
Siehe dazu auch https://www.langenzenn.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Dateien/News_und_Bekanntmachungen/Mitteilungsblatt/Langenzenn_aktuell-Heft_15_2020St.pdf 
Auf Seite 1 wird direkt erwähnt, dass das Stück gesperrt und in der Zukunft auch zurückgebaut wird.

Leider ist nach meinen Kenntnissen die Kreisstraße aktuell noch nicht umgewidmet worden, daher ist auch noch keine Anpassung der Highway-Klasse erfolgt.

Servus,
Stephan
aixbrick (2021-01-10 20:53:47+00:00): Hallo,
ein paar Fragen:
- Warum wurde https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537811991 gelöscht? Auf Luftbildern ist der Weg erkennbar. Besser würde hier natürlich highway=service mit service=driveway passen.
- Läuft https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893993716 wirklich eine paar Meter neben der Straße und hat eine Breite von "0", ist als de facto nicht vorhanden?
- "Fußweg L12" sieht für mich nach Wanderweg aus. Hat der o.g. Weg etwas damit zu tun? Wanderwege müssen als Relation angelegt werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route%3Dhiking.
Gruß
moje_konto (2023-03-10 23:26:50+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/way/607882411/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:tracktype

Numeracja tracktype, zaczynając od 1, jest od najlepszego do najgorszego.

Czyli grade1 jest do nawierzchni utwardzonych.

Skoro piasek, to grade4 było prawidłowe, więc przywróciłem takie na tej drodze.

Edytor pokazał, bo jest tu szlak. Ale warto przy okazji przejrzeć też inne okoliczne drogi.
Cascafico (2021-01-12 09:01:28+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM!
Se non ci sono segnalazioni "Carrareccia di Reant", io toglierei il nome. Se si tratta di strada forestale (non sentiero "single track"), cambia da highway=path a highway=track

Grazie per il contributo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97259680
matteo piker (2021-01-12 09:10:20+00:00): Buongiorno, questo è una vecchia mulattiera o carrareccia, usata una volta per andare fino all'abitato di reant utilizzando buoi, muli e cavalli. È larga più o meno 2 metri in tutta la sua lunghezza, però non permette il passaggio di macchine in quanto il ciottolato ha ceduto o in alcune zone non è presente. Inoltre il cartello di divieto (di solito presente all'inizio delle forestali) non è presente in quanto appunto considerata un mulattiera e non forestale. Carrareccia di Reant è il nome con cui tutti la chiamano ed è chiamata così anche nelle mappe comunale o della zona. Approfitto per chiedere se è normale che zoomando quest'ultima scomparsa in alcuni suoi tratti (forse perché aggiunta di recente)? Grazie per tutto.
Cascafico (2021-01-12 20:42:12+00:00): Grazie per le info.
L'aggiornamento dello stile di default (detto mapnik) degli ingrandimenti più alti (17-18-19) solitamente prende meno di un minuto. Ingrandimenti inferiori m'è capitato anche ore.
Altri stili prende pure giorni..
Mex (2021-01-11 09:27:03+00:00): Do we use the tag kindergarten in the UK? I found the wiki on this not very clear.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97259880
Robert Whittaker (2021-01-11 11:51:42+00:00): Yes, and there are about 3.6k uses of amenity=kindergarten in the UK: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/amenity=kindergarten

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=kindergarten seems clear enough, that it's the tag to use for what we'd typically call pre-school or nursery schools in the UK. While there's nothing on the page specifically about the UK situation, there's a pretty clear dividing line in our education system between nursery schools and institutions that offer compulsory primary education for age 4/5+.
Mex (2021-01-11 14:03:24+00:00): Thanks for the info.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97259880
Frans S (2021-01-11 11:20:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
See also attached document for more info about mapping.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Arun Madhavan (2021-01-11 02:00:01+00:00): HI, the building does not seems to be properly visible. 
They shape of the polygon you drawn is quite unusual for a building. It may be more appropriate to draw it as a point it not visible or as a square. Thanks for the contirbution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97260777
aceman444 (2021-05-06 20:41:31+00:00): Zdravim, stare nefunckne lomy nesmiete znacit ako funkcne, teda landuse=quarry. Spravne je napr. disused:landuse=quarry. Okrem toho preco ste pridali malu oblast uprostrest stareho lomu, ked uz cely velky lom je zaznaceny. A ten Bridlicolom je oficialny nazov jazera? Aky je zdroj tohto nazvu? Ortofotomozaika SR to urcite nebude. Dakujem
aceman444 (2021-05-06 21:14:01+00:00): Pardon, ten nazov Bridlicolom ste nepridali Vy. Ale to druhe plati.
5m4u9 (2021-01-11 22:33:14+00:00): hola, los edificios por lo general son rectangulares, en el mapa después de dibujar debes rectangularizar sus esquinas. los que dibujaste ya los corregí. Si conoces que oficinas/talleres(laboratorios) también se puede añadir