piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hesdrib (2019-09-11 17:32:44+00:00): Hello, 
(Ich habe die Pizzeria nicht persönlich hinzugefügt.)
Aber, die ist  definitiv geschlossen (vor Ort überprüft)
SomeoneElse (2021-05-24 14:29:16+00:00): Hello,
A quick question about the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154685520/history - is it really "q" (or "Q")?  It seems unlikely.
Best Regards,
Andy
iWowik (2019-11-17 18:03:33+00:00): А разве на здании вокзала надо писать "Вокзал"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113580757
Кстати, с одной стороны на нем написано "Рощино", а с обратной "Тюмень" (и "Tyumen").
Где на земле правда?
mavl (2019-11-18 14:29:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Слово "Вокзал", наверное, писать не надо. Я его и не писал. Просто убрал заглавные буквы (это про объект, на который дана ссылка).  
Про правду на земле не знаю. Давно там был. Примерно тогда, когда и был создан этот пакет правок (года четыре назад). С той поры там прошла как минимум одна реконструкция (если не ошибаюсь, конечно).
Theodin (2015-02-06 17:27:02+00:00): Schau mal hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Hochsitz
oder komm nach Esslingen oder Stuttgart auf unseren Stammtisch! :)
ricini_ (2015-02-08 06:46:34+00:00): thx
SomeoneElse (2015-02-02 11:27:59+00:00): Hi, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28561040 covers a very large area.  How do I know (as someone in England) which parts of it affect me?  It'd be a lot easier to understand if edits in Argentina and edits in Norway weren't combined in one large changeset.
ruthmaben (2015-02-03 04:29:57+00:00): Hey there - totally understood. Large changesets are a pain. This one was accidental.
Lyubchenko Denis (2015-02-24 17:50:22+00:00): при заполнении addr:street необходимо ориентироваться на наименовании улицы указанной в поле name на линии highway,  желательно что бы они совпадали.
acsd (2015-02-04 18:31:57+00:00): Прям супермаркет? Или небольшой магазин?
Для небольшого магазина теги такие: shop=convenience
acsd (2015-02-04 18:34:41+00:00): Улицы в деревне (или дороги вдоль жилых зон) следует обозначать тегами highway=residential
acsd (2015-02-04 18:39:59+00:00): Названия улиц следует писать со статусной частью. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
eggie (2020-07-13 17:42:58+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen
bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Thomas8122 (2015-02-05 17:40:58+00:00): Kannst du die Adresse nicht richtig zuordnen? Auf der Str. ist jedenfalls Käse. Was mir auch noch schon woanders aufgefallen ist: created_by tags werden bestimmt schon 5 Jahre oder so nur noch an Changesets gehängt und nicht mehr an Objekte.
Thomas8122 (2015-02-05 17:44:18+00:00): Ach ja, den Straßennamen richtig zu schreiben, wäre auch hilfreich. (hier mit Bindestrichen)
patzi (2015-02-02 12:25:40+00:00): Hi,
es ist nicht nötig die Spuren an Anschlussstellen zu trennen, damit Navis frühzeitig informiert werden, im Gegenteil das ist als falsch angesehen. Anstatt dessen gibt es dafür die turn:lanes Attribute, die auf den entsprechenden Abschnitten hier bereits getaggt waren. Auch der junction node soll erst da gesetzt werden, wo sich die Spuren tatsächlich trennen siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction

Für Infos über die Abbiegespuren siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:turn

Ich habe in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28564714 es wieder dementsprechend angepasst

Siehe für Fahrspurattribute auch http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2014/11/wochenaufgabe-kw4748-fahrspuren-mit-richtungsangabe-erfassen/
SomeoneElse (2015-02-03 11:30:47+00:00): Oops - I think that something's gone a bit wrong here.  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326052226 is unjoined at one end (you can see that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3326697554 is part of one way, not the expected 2).  It looks like bus route http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2669410#map=19/52.06490/-0.63397&layers=N needs revisiting too - if it goes "there and back" into the technology park then the "other sides" of the roundabout flares need adding to the bus route too.

Anyway - hope you don't mind me mentioing this - just trying to help.  Any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-03 11:40:04+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240541124 also seems to take an unusual dogleg south.  I'm guessing that perhaps it doesn't really do this?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-03 14:50:55+00:00): Hi - would it be possible for the changeset comment to be a little more descriptive about what areas this covers?  It's a huge changeset, but presumably it's just "a bit here, a bit there...".  OSMHV normally works for this but in this case http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=28564163 gives eu.cdauth.osm.lib.APIError: ResponseCode is 500 for URL http://api.openstreetmap.org:80/api/0.6/node/1523969540/ways.  How do I know, for example, which bits overlap with me in England?
adamos (2015-02-04 12:47:07+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse.
 
thaks for your message.
 
Although I usually edit just a small piece of map, in this case I used the maproulette.org page. It agregates map errors throughout the world and ask users to fix them. Honestly, I dont save after each edit. I did roughly about 30-40 fixes and saved them at once. All of the edits were narowing ways, adding missing intersections, fixing house overlays and fixing roads crossing houses incorrectly.
 
I would probably be able to analyze all of them and give a brief description it it is really needed. However, that analysis would be really time consuming.  Would that help you?
 
Rgds. Adam
SomeoneElse (2015-02-04 13:01:58+00:00): That sort of analysis is what helps other mappers to work together, so it really would help if in future you saved between each geographical fix and explained what was done there ("mAproulette.org" doesn't really say anything unfortunately.  It would be especially useful to the (often new) mappers who created the problems that you're fixing - if they don't know that what they doing is wrong, they'll keep doing it.
habi (2023-01-23 07:21:25+00:00): Ciao ydrgbjo

Ich wollte mich 'beschweren', dass du hier das Haus https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254154237 mit `name=Haus` versehen hast.
Bis ich rausfand, dass das Ding in der KGS-Liste tatsächlich mit dem Namen 'Haus' drin ist :)

Drum wünsche ich auf diesem Weg einfach einen guten Start in die Woche :)

Gruss,
habi
robert (2015-02-06 22:09:12+00:00): The "station" object you moved is supposed to mark the position on the track (in this case, underground) that the platform(s) are. The entrances to the tube are marked using different objects, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1678155316

I've reverted this changeset with my changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28662734
but then restored your sainsburys repositioning in
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28662792
UNGSC-AV (2021-05-20 09:52:28+00:00): Bonjour Vincent, Je cartographie pour UN mappers (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unite_Maps_Initiative) cette zone du Mali (lancover, highways, places..). Vous avez ajouté en 2015 ce noeud place=locatlity nommé "Tin Elaghaf". Sur les images aériennes, je ne vois rien qui me permettent de reconnaître la présence d'un village ici. Vous avez été sur le terrain pou reconnaître ce lieu ? Ou alors le point a-t-il été placé ici simplement comme une étiquette d'une zone plus large correspondant à cette localité ?Merci pour votre éclairage
Vincent Turmine (2021-05-21 05:51:20+00:00): Bonjour, j’avoue que cela fait bien longtemps. Un certain nombre de points ont été positionnés  via des bases géographiques existantes. Notamment la base puits du service hydraulique. On a utilisé cela comme element pour localiser les settlements (campement ou lieu dir) qui sont souvent des zones temporairement situées autour de puits. Ceci dit, il faudrait peut etre declassé ce point si cela ne correspond pas a une localité mais plus a un lieu-dit. Malheureusement je n’ai plus acces a la base puits. Elle peut etre dispo au niveau d’Unicef Mali
UNGSC-AV (2021-05-25 07:34:57+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre réponse. J'ai déclassé en lieu dit et  ajouté le tag abandoned:place=hamletafin d'indiquer que désormais ce lieu est inhabité. Bonne suite à vous
dforsi (2015-02-06 23:10:04+00:00): Ma questo White Hole mappato così è un negozio in mezzo alla piazza.
mariofaranda (2015-02-10 09:51:24+00:00): Ciao, grazie per il commento. È la prima volta che dito OpenStreetMap, e non sapevo bene quanto vicino ad un palazzo dovesse essere indicata la presenza di un'attività al suo interno. Ho spostato ora il segnalino indicante White Hole più vicino al perimetro dell'edificio.
emacsen (2015-02-02 17:44:00+00:00): Is the Dolci Paradise Bakery not part of the same structure as 45-02 48th Avenue?
Joel Peralta Rodríguez (2015-02-02 17:50:55+00:00): I think it's not, because the height is different in each store.
 I know the owners though, so I'll ask and change it if it's not like that. 
Thank you for your comment :)
emacsen (2015-02-03 14:00:54+00:00): Thank you for your contribution!

Is the only thing in that building the bakery, or is there residential on top?
Joel Peralta Rodríguez (2015-02-03 14:15:29+00:00): It's just the bakery, delicious by the way.
teslas_moustache (2015-02-04 03:07:28+00:00): Much appreciated, Constable.
ChrisW (2015-03-11 21:21:54+00:00): Hi Rafal
I was walking around the boundary of the closed Beddingham Landfill with a GPS today so I could map it accurately and decided that I'd change its tag from landuse=landfill to disused:landuse=landfill & landuse=grass. 
When I came to edit it I found you'd already changed it to landuse=construction. Would you mind if I changed it again or is there some construction going on I didn't spot?
Chris
Rafal Kaminski (2015-03-12 20:24:13+00:00): Hello Chris,
no problem with that. I must have missed that category.
muralito (2015-02-05 22:13:07+00:00): Hernan:

Revisa el detalle la rotonda de la RN20-RPE91 vas a ver que quedo mal. Los flechados quedaron impidiendo a quien viene por la RPE91 el este no pueda pasar.
Hernan (2016-09-01 12:27:51+00:00): Hola Muralito:
Gracias por el aviso. Acabo de ver el mail, con el aviso de tu comentario, revisando correo viejo y se me habia pasado. Ya lo arregle, mas vale tarde que nunca :).
Saludos
Hernan
SomeoneElse (2015-02-09 23:33:45+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I notice that you've deleted http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16963059/history in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28572677 with the changeset comment "Not a bridleway".  Has this (i.e. the section east of where the public bridleway goes northeast) definitely been removed?  It looked like it was still accessible to traffic when I was last there (summer last year), and there are underlying GPS traces of course.
Glassman (2015-04-02 22:17:23+00:00): Why did you tag this a mini roundabout going clockwise? This is not a mini roundabout and roundabouts, mini or otherwise are anticlockwise in the US and Canada. 

It is being reported as an error on http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/?
skyper (2015-02-04 14:52:12+00:00): Hey

Kleiner Tipp:

An die Wegweiser kannst Du auf jeden Fall auch network=* und den operator=* eintragen.

Grüße
gormo (2015-02-04 12:25:29+00:00): Was ist denn https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3327510617 für ein Knoten? Der Sternplatz ist als Pass doch schon drinnen...
gormo (2015-02-04 12:28:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/3327510613 ist auch so ein "nur-Name-Knoten"
Ogmios (2015-02-04 18:21:33+00:00): Danke f[r den Hinweis. Ist mir beim durchgehen von alten Karten versehentlich in das falsche OSM-File geraten.
GerdP (2015-10-31 10:58:59+00:00): please review way 326136175:
it was tagged highway=junction, which is rarely used. I guess you meant area:highway=junction?
If not, that way is probably obsolete.
escada (2015-10-31 15:58:25+00:00): As long as we do not have a decent method to give a name to a junction, it will stay as it is :-)
GerdP (2015-10-31 16:03:59+00:00): hmm, that way has no name tag, and sorry,
seems I've changed it already to area:highway.
GerdP (2015-10-31 16:06:56+00:00): I am cleaning up the elements tagged highway=*, as they are likely to confuse
routers.
escada (2015-10-31 16:12:33+00:00): It was meant to follow http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway%3Djunction , so we do not need the nodes on all crossing ways, when you cannot make a turn there. This mean an experiment when I was discussing this proposal with another mapper (who unfortunately left since then).
About the name, that's probably another crossing in the neighborhood.
As a tip, you can put a direct link to the problem way/node in the changeset, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326136175 in this case
GerdP (2015-10-31 16:18:52+00:00): okay, I'll revert the change(s) for ways with highway=junction for now. 
Reg. the link: I know this but I found no simple way to get the link when working in JOSM, so it always means a few copy+paste actions to produce it.
Do you have a hint ?
escada (2015-10-31 16:21:54+00:00): Select the road, shift-command-i on a mac, so I guess shift-ctrl-i on a PC, takes you to the webpage of the selected item (be it a node, a way or relation). Then you can copy the URL.
Since I was to lazy to do it today, I thought you were referring to the other node I mention above, with the named junction.
GerdP (2015-10-31 16:28:56+00:00): thanks for the hint, shift+crtl+i works well :-)
I don't see where you refer to a node ?
escada (2015-10-31 16:37:38+00:00): It was about "About the name, that's probably another crossing in the neighborhood. 
"

Oeps, didn't pay enough attention. It's near Mechelen,that  I added somewhere a junction node (I think) to indicate the name of a junction.
GerdP (2015-10-31 16:50:47+00:00): okay, thanks. I've reverted my changes
to highway=junction ways. 
There seems to be a similar problems with roundabouts, I found quite a lot of 
highway=trunk_junction" nodes in the 
centre of roundabouts with highway=trunk. They all have a ref=*,
but I think this ref=* tag should be on the roundabout way(s) ?
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3246114478
escada (2015-10-31 18:53:06+00:00): Don't know for sure, but I guess it's similar to our motorway_junction-nodes with a ref. Maybe the roundabout still has the same ref as the main road, but the "exit/junction" has a number as well.

There was some discussion on naming junctions in the past, as this is the primary name for navigation in Asian countries.
GerdP (2015-10-31 19:52:03+00:00): yes, I also think that, but this tagging is only used in a rather small area in UK.
I'll ask those mappers...
GerdP (2015-11-11 07:16:11+00:00): I learned that 
junction=yes 
name=*
is the usual way to give junctions a name, 
don't know if you noticed this discussion:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Named-junctions-tp5859074.html
escada (2015-11-11 16:34:37+00:00): You still loose the fact that you do not have to place intersection nodes on two ways that cross, but where you cannot turn.
GerdP (2015-11-11 17:37:59+00:00): Ahh, okay. I didn't understand that part until now. That is in fact much more than
just naming a junction and I also 
wondered why I have to connect roads
when no turn is allowed. On the other hand, you would not be warned when you add e.g. a sidewalk in this area without all connections, so it would also be a bit dangerous for those that don't understand the meaning of the junction area.
escada (2015-11-11 17:43:57+00:00): Mapping is always dangerous :-) E.g. adding a separate way for a cyclepath without moving the cycle roads, adding bicycle=use_sidepath,
adding cycleway=lane without adapting the turn:lanes, etc.
I have no problem that you change it in this case, as I have no real strong feelings in favour of that highway=junction as an area. It's a proposal after all.
GerdP (2015-11-11 17:52:06+00:00): okay, There are a few more highway=junctions ways, I don't know if they
exist because of your proposal or not. I'll try to contact those mappers during the next days.
escada (2015-11-11 17:55:00+00:00): Just FYI, it's not my proposal. It is originally a German proposal. Imagic left OSM somewhere in June. I don't think the proposal is active at this moment.
muralito (2015-02-04 20:51:19+00:00): Estimado neluy1611:

¿Tienes autorizacion por escrito para poder usar datos de Correo para agregarlos en OSM? En caso afirmativo, convendria hagas publico el comunicado, y en caso contrario no puedes usarlo legalemente en OSM.
neluy1611 (2015-02-05 12:43:27+00:00): http://correo.com.uy/index.asp?pagVal=434
muralito (2015-02-05 16:49:07+00:00): Considero que esas leyes que se mencionan no habilitan directamente el uso en OSM, se precisa una resolucion del Correo (una resolucion del estilo que la IMM lo hizo en su momento http://www.montevideo.gub.uy/asl/sistemas/Gestar/resoluci.nsf/de053405568724cf832575ae004f0467/7adaf8ec8d70033b832576d60041760f )
El Correo tampoco tiene nada publicado en el portal gubernamental de datos abiertos, datos.gub.uy, y las leyes de copyright son claras, nada puede ser usado salvo que la licencia lo permita, que es lo que hay que aclarar para el caso del Correo.
neluy1611 (2015-02-05 19:23:14+00:00): Estimado, el correo es una empresa PUBLICA y por ende la información que brinda es PUBLICA o sea de libre acceso a quien la use de consulta. Si leiste las leyes (los 3 apartados que tiene el link que te pasé de la propia página del Correo), en el caso de OSM (yo por lo menos) estoy consultando información pública para mejorar otra o directamente quitarme la duda si una calle se llama de una u otra forma, dentro de los textos de las leyes se menciona creo que todos los ministerios (reparticiones del gobierno aclaro porque con estas preguntas me genera la duda de que tengo la certeza que no sos uruguayo y por eso tus dudas quizás) por lo que para mi es claro que no estas cometiendo un delito al consultar una información que la ve gente de cualquier parte del mundo que tenga un acceso a internet. Espero haber ayudado (aunque no con un documento como buscas pero sí con varios links sobre la legislación de la fuente en que tienes dudas)
muralito (2015-02-06 13:12:45+00:00): Como te dije en otro comentario, no dudo que quieras mejorar, pero estas confundido con respecto a las licencias de los datos y las leyes los derechos de autor.

Podes ver muchos mapas, libros. peliculas, o cualquier otro material protegido por derechos de autor, lo que no podes, sin autorizacion previa del dueño de dichos derechos, es usarlo de una manera distinta a la prevista en la licencia de uso de dichos datos.

Creo que estas confundiendo "informacion publica" con "informacion en dominio publico". Son cosas distintas. En el primer caso podes usarla en ciertas condiciones, en el segundo podes hacer lo que quieras al se de domino publico.

No hay ningun delito en que veas la informacion del Correo, lo que no podes es usar esa informacion (sin la autorizacion expresa del Correo) para modificar datos en OSM.

En OSM se quiere tener la certeza de que la informacion que se ingresa no incumple con derechos de autor, no se quiere que hayan dudas sobre ese hecho, ante la duda sobre alguna informacion geografica, mejor no ingresar dicha informacion y mantener la base de datos de OSM LIBRE

En este caso, el correo te deja verlos en su pagina web (al igual que Google Maps, o Bing Maps), asi que la pregunta es clara, ¿Donde expresó el Correo su decision de permitir que los datos de su pagina web se copiaran y en que condiciones?
neluy1611 (2015-02-10 12:40:04+00:00): Les mandé un mail, porque si viste que en los 3 links que te pasé (es mucha letra para mi, y reconozco que no lo leí todo), de la pagina de ellos no te conforma, creo que es lo mejor, y sino bueno, no lo utilizaré mas, con respecto a los mapas Bing no sé si viste que hyto con su aporte me hizo abrir los ojos que en resumen no es lo mismo leer que usar. Saludos
Nakaner (2015-04-12 14:50:30+00:00): Ein note=* Tag ist für Mappernotizen da. Bitte erwarte nicht, dass irgendein Datennutzer, dieses Tag auswertet. Mit railway:signal:combined:function=block kannst du angeben, dass das Signal ein Blocksignal ist. 

Oder gleich JOSM und die OpenRailwayMap-Objektvorlagen verwenden, dann kannst du Signale mit einer graphischen Oberfläche taggen.
Nakaner (2015-04-12 14:52:06+00:00): Bitte gib auch an, auf welcher Gleisseite das Signal steht. railway:signal:position=bridge z.B. für ein Signal, das auf einer Signalbrücke montiert ist. Das wir auch in der Objektvorlagen in JOSM abgefragt.
Durko_freemap (2015-02-06 07:54:25+00:00): Zdravim, k comu by mala sluzit ta namalovana ciara 326141287?
robert (2015-02-04 19:34:56+00:00): Regarding Rubastic Way/Road, we tend to use the not:name tag for this to let QA tools strike it off their list. I've done this now.
Jonga (2015-02-04 20:19:23+00:00): OK, thanks.
Jonga (2015-02-05 16:12:39+00:00): In case you wonder, I must have been seeing things as I checked again today and it is definitely Rubastic Rd, so have changed it back!
robert (2015-02-06 21:52:58+00:00): If you need to travel through the school grounds to traverse this footway, it might be good to set the end nodes as "gate"s so pedestrian routers don't try to send people through the school as a shortcut.
Matt Brayley (2015-02-07 10:50:41+00:00): Hi, in actual fact, this footpath is not within the school grounds. There is a metal fence to seperate them, therefore it is public right of way and your suggestion might be unnecessary.
robert (2015-02-07 12:49:23+00:00): Ok, I've pulled the border of the school back from the path then so it's clear.
Keep up the good work - footway/cut-thoughs are extremely useful things to add.
robert (2015-02-06 21:47:06+00:00): Great start - as you can see plenty of road names are missing in this area.

p.s. if you use a non-Internet Explorer browser, you'll be able to use a slightly easier editor, iD.
Peilscheibe (2015-02-05 08:39:22+00:00): Was soll denn "access=restricted" an den Tankstellenzufahrten bedeuten? Und was ist der Vorteil oder Sinn, die Tankstellen-POIs zu löschen und deren Attribute am Gebäude anzubringen? (Die Dächer kann man übrigens separat mit building=roof einzeichnen)
Michael Steffens (2015-02-06 16:57:12+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise! Den Tag restricted habe ich einer anderen Tankstelle als Vorbild entnommen. Er soll vermeiden, dass Routingsoftware Abkürzungen übers Tankstellengelände plant. Was hier zugegebenermaßen nur bei einer von vieren eine Rolle spielt. 
Die Gebäude sind hier selbst die POIs. Sie haben zwangsläufig dieselbe und nur die eine Adresse. Und wenn das Gebäude abgerissen wird, verschwindet auch der POI. Worin besteht der Vorteil, sie getrennt zu führen? Ist die Änderung ein Problem?
Danke auch noch mal für den Hinweis mit dem building=roof. Das sieht plausibler aus, als meine Lösung!
Peilscheibe (2015-02-10 17:39:03+00:00): Der Trend geht ja zu: "ein Objekt pro Feature". Das mag bei diesen Tankstellen noch nicht problematisch sein, aber man beraubt sich der Möglichkeiten, wenn man alles ans Gebäude pappt. Nehmen wir nur mal unterschiedliche Öffnungszeiten von Tanke und Waschanlage und Shop.
Mit der Adresse am Gebäude und den POIs als nodes innendrin ist man da flexibler. Und die Adresse für einen POI kann man aus dem umgebenden Gebäude ermitteln.
Das könnte auch eine Intention der Vor-mapper gewesen sein, die damit hinüber ist. Einen informationellen Mehrwert bietet es ja nicht, POIs mit dem Gebäude zu verschmelzen.
Michael Steffens (2015-02-11 18:49:42+00:00): Überzeugt. Habe die separaten POI-Objekte wiederhergestellt.
532910 (2020-07-30 00:40:33+00:00): И чем примечательны были ребята?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-06 17:18:36+00:00): Would "shop=yes" perhaps have made sense on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173442291/history ?
AlexTheTux (2015-02-06 19:37:29+00:00): Probably answer for question is YES but my edit was about errors with "buildings" tag - I do known nothing about shop in this place (is it really shop? what type of shop? etc).
emacsen (2015-02-03 03:24:02+00:00): Hi. Was this import discussed anywhere, such as the imports list?