piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
philippec (2020-11-18 17:17:50+00:00): Dit zowel de foto in Brugge als in Gent.  In Gent bovendien lijkt de plaatsing verkeerd.  Volgens GRB staat de aed op de rand van voetpad en straat.  Een mapillary sequence ware beter geweest, dan kon ik het korrigeren.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-11-18 22:57:28+00:00): Hey Philippe,

De gedraaide foto is een tekortkoming van de tool, daar kan niet veel meer aangepast worden.
De AED in gent is accurater gezet
philippec (2020-11-19 09:25:56+00:00): De Noord-Zuid positie is nog niet goed.  Zie het zebrapad op de  Esri Imagery Clarity.
azakh-world (2020-11-14 09:00:04+00:00): Hello.
stop_area relation is the thing to add entrances and elevators at a railway station, not route relations. E.g, https://www.osm.org/relation/10661642

Best regards, Alexey
tkoval83 (2020-11-13 21:30:04+00:00): Доброго дня, ваша клініка займає цілий будинок?
DP24PH (2020-11-14 11:39:37+00:00): This is a follow-up changeset for c94054292 that PCU-Dasmarinas Link Road got updated into highway=secondary status, and SCSEV's Saint Charbel Avenue (albeit into tolled roadway) got turned over into the City Government of Dasmarinas. More info thru https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94054292.
Your understanding is highly appreciated. Thank you very much! Always remember to be safe, be well, stay sane, and you are loved.


DP24
JuanjoMC (2020-11-13 20:52:29+00:00): Hi OsmAnd_Pieter,

I see that, in this change set, you edited several paths in the Begijnbos and NOH Sport Center area.

It seems that you are using several years old imagery and, therefore, you are sometimes drawing paths that no longer exist and broke paths that were actually correct. Keep in mind that the Begijnbos is constantly evolving, indeed a lot of old trees have been cutted several years back and entire portions of the wood has been replanted.

Some examples :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871406993#map=19/50.90143/4.38992

Here you have drawn a path trough an area that has been replanted and the path no longer exists. On passing, you broke an existing one.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862103192#map=19/50.90022/4.39535

Here you have modified a path that is now running over a kind of wood bridge over the ground. If you look at recent imagery, ie Urbis 2019, it is perfectly visible.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871406987

Here you added a path that does not longer exists. Again, looking at recent imagery, you can see that this area is now full of vegetation.

I happen to work nearby and I pass by there quite often, so I can assure you that this path is gone.

May I ask you to revise your changes using recent aerial imagery?

Also, note that while LIDAR hillshading, that you are also using, is extremely powerfull (one can see paths in the wood!!!) it is also something like 5 years old

Regards
FrankOverman (2020-11-14 10:28:05+00:00): Is het zeker dat we spoor gedeeltes moeten verwijderen? Ik denk op te pikken dat sommigen de historie willen bewaren. Denk dan door tagging aan te passen.
Bart_oppad (2020-11-15 21:42:42+00:00): Dag Frank,

Bedankt voor je reactie, wat je schrijft zou zo maar kunnen. Zo wordt het ook hier beschreven: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned. 

Ik heb al even zitten kijken hoe ik het verwjderde stukje spoor weer terug krijg. Ik kan het er weer zelf intekenen. Maar is er ook een optie om de door mij aangebrachte wijziging ongedaan te maken? Ik ben nog een beetje een beginneling... Bedankt, Bart
FrankOverman (2020-11-25 21:20:21+00:00): Sorry, was vergeten te antwoorden.
Als je een edit terug wilt draaien, dan kan dat beste in JOSM, met de reverter plugin:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

In deze changeset zitten nogal wat changes, zou ook zonde zijn om terug te draaien. Als iemand comments heeft kan gekeken worden wat te doen.
Bart_oppad (2020-12-03 08:24:10+00:00): Hoi Frank, ik heb tot nu toe steeds alles gedaan met iD, JOSM ben ik nog niet machtig, ik laat het voorlopig maar zo.
blef (2020-11-13 18:18:29+00:00): Quelques précisions sur le pourquoi de ce changeset:

-les POI avec addr:street=Place du Marché nécessitent qu'une voie à proximité porte ce nom. Le nom associé à amenity=marketplace ne suffit pas à établir ce lien (=> erreur Osmose).

-la création d'une zone piétonne highway=pedestrian résoud ce problème. Le tag amenity=marketplace aurait pu être conservé sur cette zone, mais les horaires  deviennent ambigus: ceux-ci ne concernent que le marché, pas la zone piétonne qui est, elle, accessible 24/7. C'est pourquoi j'ai séparé la place physique, du marché événement ponctuel en basculant ce dernier sur un POI spécifique.
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-13 18:23:15+00:00): Hey there,

Try to add a descriptive summary for your changesets. This helps other mappers understand what you want to do.
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-13 18:33:23+00:00): Hey there,

What is the source you are using for the peak's name?
Be sure to read https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright concerning the use of data from elsewhere.
(tldr; you can not use data from elsewhere without the right license)
ravald03 (2020-11-13 18:45:27+00:00): Hello , 
I belong to this place so based on my local knowledge I am updating the names of the peaks.

So Far I have edited the names of the peaks which have famous local temples.
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-13 20:14:38+00:00): You can add a tag "source" and a source "local knowledge" to your changeset when saving it to OSM. You can also add a source "survey" if you have very recently surveyed (visited) the object.
ravald03 (2020-11-14 05:39:33+00:00): Sure Thanks for the suggestion, will do that :)
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-14 10:23:46+00:00): No problem.
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-13 18:25:47+00:00): Hey Leo,

"foutmelding" is geen bron (source), of het moet de naam van een programma of laag zijn die je hebt gebruikt. De programma of laag geeft zelf de foutmelding aan en jij moet die foutmelding dan interpreteren.
Dit hoef je dan ook niet op te schrijven.
Leo Slager (2020-11-13 18:38:58+00:00): Hi Daniel,
Na meer dan 3 jaar ben je de eerste die daarover valt. Maar als een foutmelding in het programma "OSM Inspector" de aanleiding is om daar in dat gebied fouten te gaan herstellen, waarom zou ik dat dan niet vermelden ?
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-13 19:56:58+00:00): Je kan in de beschrijving aangeven dat je een fout oplost. OSM inspector is in principe gewoon een foutmelder en dat weten de meeste mensen wel. Anders kunnen ze het altijd opzoeken om dat te zien.
Je kan altijd aangeven dat je OSM Inspector, Osmose, JOSM Validator etc. gebruikt als bron.

Mij maakt het niets uit of je het uiteindelijk ook wel/niet invult. Anderen kan het altijd helpen om te weten welke bronnen en lagen je gebruikt voor je bewerkingen, dus vul het vooral in als je het niet kan laten.
Uralla (2020-11-20 06:00:11+00:00): Тут ничего не сломалось? Подозрительно белый полигон без леса, закрытой территории.
indigomc (2020-11-14 18:09:39+00:00): Why did you make this kink in the 'Kumarapuram-Murinjapaam Road', and not just that, attach it to other roads nearby?  I could just revert it, but presumably you have a reason? Thanks.
osmid17 (2020-11-14 19:09:32+00:00): sir,
 it was my mistake. i am really sorry. 
at the hidden comments it has been mention a problem regarding this road. thats why i have done that. i humbly request you to revert it. please revert it sir...
indigomc (2020-11-15 17:45:59+00:00): OK, but while I can revert the changeset, that will also remove all the changes you made along with this one. I'll revert the changeset tomorrow unless you let me know, is that ok?
indigomc (2020-11-16 19:48:08+00:00): Reverted
berndw (2020-11-14 13:02:55+00:00): Hallo Bannwald Napf

Willkommen bei Openstreetmap

Auch wenn die Benutzung eines Weges verboten ist, sollte man ihn nicht einfach löschen.
Es gibt Möglichkeiten mit dem Schlüssel access https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access und mit einer guten Beschreibung (=description) solche Wege zu kennzeichnen, damit andere User diese nicht wieder eintragen. Außerdem erhält das die Historie eines Objekts sichtbar, dann kann man später auch Änderungen nachvollziehen.
Ein guter Router sollte sich daran halten
Was hältst Du davon?
Wenn gewünscht kann man Deine Edits revertieren und Du versiehst die Wege mit sinnvollen Eigenschaften

Für Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung
Bernd
*abq* (2020-11-29 15:00:42+00:00): Hallo Bannwald Napf,
das einfache Löschen ist das falsche Vorgehen. Die Wege waren korrekt getagged mit access:no.
Ich habe die Wege wiederhergestellt und vorläufig mit abandoned:highway getagged.Damit bleiben die Daten zumindest in der Datenbank erhalten.
VG Reiner
*abq* (2020-11-29 15:08:46+00:00): Mein Kommentar bezieht sich auf die anderen gelöschten Wege im Bereich Stübenwasen.
*abq* (2020-12-23 09:55:28+00:00): Die gelöschten Wege weren korrekt getagged mit access=no und einer Begründung hierfür.
Ich habe die Löschung revertiert und zunächst mal zu abandoned: geändert. 

Bitte nicht einfach Wege löschen, nur weil einem das in den Kram passt! Um darszustellen, dass Wege gesperrt sind, gibt es andere Wege, die auch genutzt wurden.
*abq* (2020-12-23 09:55:16+00:00): Die gelöschten Wege weren korrekt getagged mit access=no und einer Begründung hierfür.
Ich habe die Löschung revertiert und zunächst mal zu abandoned: geändert. 

Bitte nicht einfach Wege löschen, nur weil einem das in den Kram passt! Um darszustellen, dass Wege gesperrt sind, gibt es andere Wege, die auch genutzt wurden.
eggie (2020-11-13 20:20:22+00:00): 
dag +ORH
Wellicht nog craft=plumber
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dplumber

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-13 20:29:09+00:00): Dag Roel,
Op een track is foot en bicycle=yes gewoon default.
Op een path taggen we het vaak bij omdat daar nogal eens restricties zijn. 
gr eggie
Roelieboelie (2020-11-13 21:45:26+00:00): Ja goeie, is ook zo... vergeten. Thnx. Heb het aangepast.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-13 23:07:35+00:00): What's wrong with `operator=` here? Your "local need" should intepret data for itself.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-13 23:08:26+00:00): Not to mention someone has previously added `operator=AFCD` to some of them
keilingha (2020-11-14 04:03:27+00:00): Firstly, with AFCD in operator, the node would show as AFCD: Mxxx (ref) in most local apps but with your latest change it shows as Agricultural and Fisheries Conservation ... and users CANNOT get the modt important information which is the ref= perimeter. Obviously there is something to be done.

Secondly, as mentioned in my message yesterday, not all route_markers are operated by AFCD in Hong Kong for the all long-distance trails. Have you checked with that?
Kovoschiz (2020-11-14 11:34:04+00:00): 1. Then you should tell them the truncate the name, not remove useful information from everyone. 
2. If you know the correct value, why don't you change it for the applicable ones?
Kovoschiz (2020-11-14 11:35:58+00:00): 1. The convention is to always use full form over abbreviations. There's also `*:short_name=` and `*:wikidata=`.
keilingha (2020-11-14 12:42:47+00:00): I din’t think you are doing something which is no necessary. Would you add an operator to each of traffic_signals you meet? Would you add an owner to each buildings you in the map? If you have time, why don’t you add more names to the building? Unfortunately you are doing things that is hindering HK people the right to enjoy the map. Or you don’t know what distance post at all?
keilingha (2020-11-14 13:00:36+00:00): The reason is very simple: Nobody is interested in who operate a distance post. All people want to know the Reference number on the sign post only.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-14 15:25:28+00:00): 1. Yes, because some traffic lights are on private roads, 
2. Yes, land-use, plot, and facility information can be important
3. Why don't you do it them, and stop removing other information needlessly? 
4. You are hindering the quality of data for everyone. This is an unfortunate take.  It's not a matter of who will "enjoy". It's useful information for anyone. If you want control, curate your own map data from this.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-14 15:27:19+00:00): 5. This is exactly why it is the reponsibility of applications to show data to their users as they want. Map data has to remain useful for anyone. What you are doing is tagging for the renderer and application. Why don't you make changes or open an issue with your applications?
keilingha (2020-11-14 17:42:53+00:00): It is you that are doing unnecessary damage to the map. Who told you that anyone is interested in the information you added? I think nobody. Are you a decision maker? What is your position then? You know you are making a crucial change and did you give time for transition? You know UAT? You better face your conscience now.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-15 00:49:16+00:00): 1. You unnecessarily removed information from the map data. 
2. You seems to still fail to grasp the idea that it has to "matter" to someone. As long as it's the truth, anything can be added. I'm sure you won't fare well when asking everyone else in the world why are they asking some detail you aren't bothered well.
3. This is your responsibility then. There's nothing about "transition". All updates are live. The map data was crucially wrong before as well. If you want control, as I have said, make and use your own copy of the data or render and implement the edits you want. You should understand what you are working with.
小智智 (2020-12-15 12:00:18+00:00): There is no consensus whether the full or short form should be used for operator=* as mentioned on the wiki page. Therefore the most common name is typed into it.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-13 23:08:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94081404
axelr (2020-11-14 11:23:20+00:00): Hallo JasonLS, willkommen bei osm.
An deiner Buslinie ist noch einiges verbesserungswürdig, aber ich kann keinen Hinweis auf eine Schnellbuslinie SB39 finden.
Ist das eine geplante Busroute ?
Gruß, Axel
ra0e (2020-11-18 23:31:32+00:00): Ich habe mir das angesehen. Das können wir so nicht stehen lassen, Alex. 

Könnten wir bitte den Zustand von vorher einspielen? Das sind Straßenbahnlinien und keine Buslinie.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-13 23:08:53+00:00): So do you have a problem with `owner=` or `operator=`? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94081404
naveenpf (2020-11-15 15:09:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94082343
yvecai (2020-11-15 16:20:24+00:00): Hello, is the ski piste abandoned?
itineris (2020-11-15 18:55:58+00:00): Hi. It used to be a ski-running track. Two years ago it was changed (including the painted signs) to a running track.

Ski-running would require some snow, you know, we don't have in years. :)
yvecai (2020-11-16 05:57:52+00:00): Hello, sorry for the lack of snow, I fear that in the years to come we need to remove other pistes from the map, unfortunately.
Happy running though! 
Yves
eggie (2020-11-13 20:23:39+00:00): Dag TNC..
Een ontoegankelijk pad is toch ook een pad?
Wanneer er geen pad is kan het uiteraard weg.
Zet op de eindnode noexit=yes, want een andere mapper gaat het anders weer verbinden.
MVG,
eggie
TNC_ (2020-11-14 07:40:14+00:00): I changed as proposed. Thanks!
jfd553 (2020-11-13 21:03:14+00:00): He, I am editing Sherbrooke area and you are deleting/symplifing my edits as I am working on it. Stop it.
jfd553 (2020-11-13 21:05:35+00:00): Esri world imagery I use is much more recent and accurate than Bing one. Please discuss dataset before removing works of others .
Frans S (2020-12-23 15:21:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here, 
A few remarks.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)
Another issue.  You mapped quite a number of buildings, but not that accurate. 
Please correct the the buildings to reflect the real size.and correct the position to The project imagery
Best regards and keep mapping
Best regards and keep mapping.
jfd553 (2020-11-13 21:49:37+00:00): I see that you are editing features I updates over the last days. What are the problems with these edits, considering you are doing Quality Control over landuse?
km2bp (2021-01-23 11:39:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188865507 
You made a big mess by incorrectly adding photos. See: http://openpoimap.org/?map=various&zoom=16&lat=52.50518&lon=13.4309&layers=B00FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFF
You should only tag with a photo what is visible in the photo. In this case, it's one street crossing. 
I mark with the photo only a short section of the road or trail visible in the photo
I will put photos this way : 
http://openpoimap.org/?map=various&zoom=17&lat=51.9531&lon=14.7151&layers=B00FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFF
Here are my other photo maps
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/km2bp/diary/391419 

Here are some other examples of how to use photos:

This page encourages you to add photos to OSM 
http://gk.historic.place/

And these are 2 interesting Polish websites with photos
https://polska-org.pl/508848,Wroclaw,Ko … Ciala.html

https://fotopolska.eu/Warszawa/b330184, … ?najnowsze

I make sure that the map is clear and orderly. I want my message to reach as many mappers in Germany as possible. Therefore, I will post a copy of this message on the forum. The mistakes in adding photos to the Berlin map aren't just from you.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442917933#map=15/52.5156/13.4432
Greetings from Poland to all the mapping volunteers in Germany
I used google translator
km2bp (2021-01-23 11:43:48+00:00): And these are 2 interesting Polish websites with photos
https://polska-org.pl/508848,Wroclaw,Kosciol_Bozego_Ciala.html

https://fotopolska.eu/Warszawa/b330184,Skyliner.html?najnowsze
PantherStrix (2021-01-25 05:01:51+00:00): Corrected with Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98088200
elgolfo (2020-11-15 09:45:02+00:00): Hallo fräbrawu,

mit diesem Changeset gibt es mehrere Probleme:
1. Hast du wieder einmal place-Nodes verschoben, damit die dir so wichtigen Kirchen prominent auf der Karte dargestellt werden. Und nicht von den Ortsnamen verdeckt werden. Das ist Mappen für den Renderer.
2. Du hast bei den Orten teilweise die Klassifizierung geändert (village->town, hamlet->village). Das ist aufgrund des fehlenden Changeset-Kommentars nicht nachvollziehbar, warum das geschah. Ich vermute, es wird dann für dich schöner dargestellt. 
Für Gröbming gibt die Einwohnerzahl diese Änderung nicht her.

Ich habe daher deine Änderungen an den place-Nodes revertiert[1].

Moritz

[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94133929
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94084733
KPull (2020-11-15 09:11:37+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the edit. You marked Triq Pinu Mifsud as one-way however this would prevent anyone from getting out of the street. Is this correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94084955
moreno96 (2020-11-13 21:10:14+00:00): سلام.
لطفا قبل از شروع به ویرایش نقشه، مطالب آموزشی مربوط به ویرایش رو مطالعه کنید.
این تغییراتی که شما ایجاد کردید باعث شده کوچه ها از روی هم رد بشن و مشکل ایجاد کرده.
ضمنا میتونید عضو گروه تلگرامی ویرایشگران OpenStreetMap بشید و جواب سوالاتتون رو بگیرید
Sosha1996 (2020-11-22 06:55:00+00:00): ویرایش شما باعث آسیب رسیدن به نقشه شده.

لطفا در ویرایش‌های بعدی خود دقت کنید.
Rostaman521 (2020-12-08 00:53:25+00:00): ulična parkirna mjesta su već označena s parking:lane:* tagovima na wayevima
elgolfo (2020-11-15 17:14:46+00:00): Hallo _Schweini,

du hast diesen Weg bis jetzt zwei Mal zu einem Waldweg gemacht. Ich musste das immer wieder korrigieren.
Als ich vor ein paar Wochen vor Ort war, gab es dort kein Schild, was diesen Weg als Waldweg ausweist. 
Auf welcher Grundlage basiert deine Festlegung, dass es ein Feldweg sei?
Gern kannst du auch Fotos bei Mapillary oder auch woanders hochladen, um die Situation vor Ort zu zeigen.
Solange dort kein Waldweg-Schild steht, ist es eine normale Verbindungsstraße. Lass das bitte so, es sei denn, du hast neue Erkenntnisse.

Viele Grüße
Moritz
Lulu-OSB (2020-11-13 21:25:50+00:00): J'ai indiqué Magasin d'art mais ce n'est pas exactement ça. Il s'agit d'une boutique de créateurs (objets de créateurs locaux vendus au même endroit, pas de fabrication sur place). Ce ne sont pas des œuvres d'art mais des bijoux, vêtements, objets en bois flottés... Si quelqu'un connait un type d'élément mieux approprié.
eggie (2020-11-13 22:08:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
ivanbranco (2020-11-15 16:02:10+00:00): Ciao Italian Technology,

per taggare i moli valuta anche questo tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpier
Kseniya_Nekrasava (2020-11-18 08:18:28+00:00): Hello!) I'm sorry, but your edits look like non-existent on the real map. I reverted this changeset in JOSM. Sorry for that and good luck for your next mapping!)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94087411
Kseniya_Nekrasava (2020-11-18 08:22:42+00:00): My edits are in 94325914 changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94087411
Kseniya_Nekrasava (2020-11-18 08:23:21+00:00): My edits are in 94325914 changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94087411
Atakua (2020-11-13 22:24:16+00:00): Hej! Tack för dina bidrag med stigar, bra job!
user_2066394 (2021-04-09 20:43:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152582521
Commerzbank
opening_hours="Durch Covid Filiale derzeit geschlossen. Selbstbedienungsgeräte weiterhin verfügbar."

Aktueller Stand?
marczoutendijk (2020-12-04 12:32:36+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by user TarasD on DWG-request by changeset 94852712.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
trial (2021-07-17 11:35:11+00:00): Bonjour, merci de NE PAS mettre network sur les arrêts, Cf. http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/Kalepom
eggie (2020-11-14 07:52:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Lijkt me oke.. evt nog phone=+31 toevoegen..
Kleine aanpassing verricht: BAG-data (Kadaster) hersteld
MVG,
Eggie
Commodoortje (2020-11-16 18:19:57+00:00): De gedeelde foto gaat niet werken.
image=C:\Users\dspij\OneDrive\Wincubator\Startup\logo
is geen locatie waar internet kan delen.
Persoonlijk gebruik ik onedrive niet voor het delen van foto's.
Misschien heb je iets aan deze link:
https://pulse.microsoft.com/nl-nl/work-productivity-nl-nl/na/fa3-supermakkelijk-online-fotos-delen-met-onedrive/
Jillis inactivE (2020-12-02 13:14:39+00:00): image= zou ik sowieso niet gebruiken, deze tag is 'rejected' volgens de wiki van OpenStreetMap.
Jillis inactivE (2020-12-02 13:16:39+00:00): Of key eigenlijk: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image?
gileri (2020-11-13 22:18:16+00:00): source should be "http://www.perraud-fleurs.eu/"
Frans S (2020-12-24 11:24:45+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping on this project
Please improve your mapping skills.
Your mappings are rather inaccurate and not squared.
I send you a PM with more info about how to map.
Best regards and keep mapping
Ltrlg (2020-11-13 22:25:29+00:00): Source erronée : fait avec Bing.
sheldonelectric (2020-12-11 21:16:16+00:00): I had replaced the name:en name:de name:fr with int_name. According to the wiki we shall copy nothing more than what is on the ground, which are prefix (optional), name, int_name. 
Why did you re-add the name:en?