piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Serzhanya (2016-01-26 12:31:45+00:00): Отношение сломали, будьте аккуратнее, пожалуйста.
Max-P-S (2016-01-27 11:41:46+00:00): - Ao, izvenite. Shto sluchilos? Vy spravili? A ya (tolko) perevodil, ne znal kak eto mozhet shto-to slomat. Eshe raz izvenyajus -
maraf24 (2016-01-09 14:02:04+00:00): Nie używamy skrótów w nazwach ulic.
mavl (2016-01-08 16:28:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавили тег "addr:city=Боровской", хотя населённый пункт называется Боровский.
BCNorwich (2016-01-10 08:02:20+00:00): Hi, just wanted to let you know you've somehow dragged several nodes and made self intersections on the outline of the construction land. Do you want to redraw it or shall I try to revert the changes.
RMC1461 (2016-01-10 09:13:10+00:00): I will amend it when I get on PC later on today. Thanks I'm still quite new at this.
AdVerburg (2016-01-08 19:29:35+00:00): Malcolm, what is wrong with the object (a pole) colour and/or colour pattern?
malcolmh (2016-01-08 20:04:54+00:00): The objects “light_minor” and “light_major” are simply lights without any details of the supporting structure. If you wish to specify the supporting structure, then you should use a seamark:type such as “beacon_special_purpose”, etc. Then you may specify its colour, shape, etc. ?Also, to specify a colour_pattern, there should be at least two colours.
Durko_freemap (2016-01-11 10:01:22+00:00): Zdravim, do tagu name prosim davajte prioritne slovensky nazov vid: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization, a potom name:en, name:hu ... 
Vdaka Durko
*Martin* (2016-01-12 08:48:23+00:00): Prosim opravte to ako pise Durko.
jasovmapper (2016-01-13 09:45:24+00:00): opravene, zmiatlo ma to oznacenie Jasovskeho jazera v anglictine, ok do buducna prioritne SK nazov
mueschel (2016-09-12 20:03:43+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du dir diesen Changeset bitte nochmal anschauen, da sind einige Fehler drin:
access=private - d.h. da darf kein Spaziergänger lang?
Schreibfehler im Hofnamen.
Heißt der Weg wirklich so wie der eine Hof? 
Es überlappen sich ein highway=track und ein highway=service, das kann nicht richtig sein.
abdeldjalil (2016-01-09 16:22:19+00:00): Salut , ces chalets sont démoli selon satellite google maps , aujourd’hui , les appartements en construction sont dans cette place , merci
Superadlen (2016-01-10 13:56:18+00:00): merci kho
Hufkratzer (2025-12-25 20:53:41+00:00): Hi,
I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390246009 should be tagged with leisure=sports_centre + sport=horse_racing instead of leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. Compare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a#Racecourse_(horse_racing).
(Since you are a high-ranking OSM member, I don't dare to change that myself.)
apm-wa (2025-12-27 03:30:27+00:00): There are no ranks in the OSM movement. If you think you can improve the map by adding or updating tags, then just do it! That said, I chose those tags because the hippodromes in TKM are not only for racing. People go there to ride, for riding lessons, and sometimes just to admire the horses. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Riding. The hippodromes are multipurpose so more tags are probably better.
Hufkratzer (2025-12-27 16:32:18+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. leisure=pitch still seems inappropriate to me for the entire area. To my knowledge, this is normally only used for areas where a sport is practiced, but not for such large areas that also contain many service roads and buildings. That's also what it says on the wiki page. In Australia, landise=recreation_ground is often used for racecourses. Maybe that would work here too. I don't know. In any case, I won't change the tags. Sorry for the inconvenience.
GerdP (2016-01-10 12:02:19+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
The tag highway=red_lights_cameras is rarely used.
Please check this page, it explains how to map a red light camera:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement
az09 (2016-01-13 19:21:04+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dwaterfall
Клиф же лучше будет нарисовать линией что бы мапник отрендерил
Ну и водопад по хорошему должен быть точкой на линии некоего водного течения
mariotomo (2019-11-14 20:09:36+00:00): hola.  pusiste un edificio dándole nombre 'English', puedes ayudarme a entenderlo?  sí, sé que es hace tiempo.
R0bst3r (2016-01-28 15:11:31+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM.
Namen sollten nur bei Dingen verwendet werden, welche auch Namen besitzen!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Rudolf Mayer (2017-09-19 15:49:41+00:00): for minigolf, please use leisure=miniature_golf, not leisure=golf_course; it had the correct tag initially
gerosm (2016-01-09 08:51:18+00:00): Ist der Pfad 270454233 wirklich gepflastert?
BCNorwich (2016-01-15 13:52:29+00:00): Added building, driveway and a bit more info.
Simon M (2016-01-09 09:43:53+00:00): pour le lavoir, il faut plutôt mettre :
amenity / lavoir
building / public
et normalement toute les choses qui portent le même nom que leur description (lavoir, mairie, cimetière, ...) il ne faut pas mettre de name.
aceman444 (2019-10-09 18:19:21+00:00): Hi, what is your source for the reclassifiation of the roads? Where did you get those roads are 'tertiary' in the Slovak road system?
Durko_freemap (2016-01-23 20:28:54+00:00): Vlado tu nemoze byt "nám." , ked na mape je "námestie"
2vlado (2016-01-23 20:38:34+00:00): JOSM mi tam automaticky navrhol "americke nam." takze zrejme toto nieje jedina chyba v tej lokalite
trial (2017-08-17 22:56:07+00:00): Bonjour, je vois que le Poste de Secours (3934393147) est tagué comme une station de sauvetage en mer mais je ne vois point d'eau.
Ce ne serait pas plutôt du first aid :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfirst_aid
amenity=first_aid
health_facility:type=first_aid
Virgile1994 (2017-08-18 13:50:30+00:00): Salut. Tu as sans doute raison, je suis absolument pas compétant en ce domaine de tags. Je te laisse faire la correction ou je la fais moi-même ?
trial (2017-08-18 22:21:50+00:00): Fait: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3934393147#map=20/47.36585/0.67751&layers=H. Une autre remarque (pas traitée) : tu as mis un nom qui ressemble à une description. Normalement les attributs doivent se suffire à eux-mêmes. Mais s'il y a écrit "Poste de Secours" ça me va. Ce n'est pas plutôt un simple défibrillateur au fait ?
Durko_freemap (2016-01-23 20:26:12+00:00): Ahoj vlado, ktora je Pomorovska ulica? nenasiel som v mape
Durko
2vlado (2016-01-23 20:35:33+00:00): Perecka ma byt pomorovska, ale zatial neviem odkial pokial, neskor to opravim
Patr1k_P (2020-09-28 16:36:25+00:00): chcem sa ta opytat, v tejto sade si doplnal parkovacie automaty

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3934325902#map=19/48.90742/18.17215&layers=N

...ale v tom case tam je aj poznamka,ze tam je,alebo bolo free parking....chcel by som to uzavriet,ale som z toho jeleň...neviem ci si na tom mieste bol,ci si pamatas ako to bolo
kayle (2020-09-29 04:35:19+00:00): Tie automaty si letmo vybavujem, ale ako to je s tím parkovaním už veru nie. Je to ale niekoľko rokov staré, takže je pravdepodobné, že už to je spoplatnené. Všade sa to smeruje k spoplatneniu.
Patr1k_P (2020-09-29 06:12:35+00:00): Jasné, len je zaujímavé, že v rovnakom čase, alebo skôr v tom istom roku dal on poznámku že je to free a ty si zasa doplnil tie automaty, tak sa to akosi nezhoduje :-)
Patr1k_P (2020-09-29 06:13:50+00:00): Ale keďže tam už vtedy boli automaty, tak to asi nemohlo byť bezplatné parkovisko
kayle (2020-09-29 06:19:08+00:00): Možno boli tie automaty čerstvo osadené. Značil som ich z videa (kamera v aute) a popravde, netuším či boli, alebo neboli v prevádzke. (už ani nepozriem, tak staré videá nearchivujem)
Ale fyzicky už existovali.
BeKri (2016-01-14 08:15:52+00:00): Hallo,
ich erlaube mich,
Dich auf verschiedenes hinzuweisen (Bezug auf UNCLES BURGER (3934361297, v1) :
addr:city=MÜNCHEN PASING ist nicht ok: 
1. alles GROSS ist ganz schlecht, 
2. in city gehört nur München, 
Pasing ist wenn dann ein addr:suburb
---
addr:street=Bahnhofsplatz ist am Hauptbahnhof,
hier haben wir den Pasinger Bahnhofsplatz,
dass ist ein wichtiger Unterschied
Die Läden in den Arcaden haben aber ALLE KEINE Adresse ... da alle im building mit Pasinger Bahnhofsplatz 5.
---
Wie kommst Du beim Radiologisches Zentrum auf wheelchair=no ?
-> siehe Homepage, Zugang im hinteren Bereich
---
Ich empfehle, sich in der Umgebung zu orientieren, was da an Taggs drin steht.
Noch viel Spaß beim taggen !
user_5359 (2016-01-08 20:57:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add the product that is being sold (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine)
adamsc (2021-02-18 14:15:30+00:00): Cześć,
Te obszary do snowkitingu w okolicach Warszawy to oficjalne miejsca wykorzystywane za zgodą właścicieli pól, czy też potencjalne miejsca na których można uprawiać ten sport? Ktoś w tych miejscach uprawia snowkiting?
SomeoneElse (2016-01-14 13:58:53+00:00): I'd say that Burnett Lane as more of a road than a track actually (and I'm often the one in OSM arguing for stuff to be tagged as "track" rather than some sort of road).

Which part of the previous tagging was incorrect?  If your navigation software is sending you down "lanes=1; width=2" roads when you don't expect it to I'd suggest that you need to configure it or change it, not tag incorrectly for the router :)
Johnny Mapperseed (2016-02-15 20:15:30+00:00): Hey Bud. Lake Huron is not merely a lake. It is a GREAT Lake. 

The wiki seems to disagree with itself because https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Great_Lakes this says that the lakes are to be tagged as natural=coastline.

Are you certain your change was correct?
jptolosa (2016-02-21 11:59:33+00:00): The wiki seem suggest tag all lakes as natural=water: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline#What_about_lakes.3F

There are a lot of "large lakes" tagged as natural=water.

Here you can see Lake Ontario was tagged as natural=water since august 2015 not for me: http://www.imagico.de/map/coastline_quality5_en.php
SK53 (2016-03-18 22:14:15+00:00): It would have been nice before you made this change if you were aware of the considerable discussion over many years as to why the Great Lakes were mapped as coastline. See for example this discussion on Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/3z7w9d/where_are_the_great_lakes/ and just one thread from talk-us https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2015-April/014776.html. I'm sure most would agree with the sentiment, but the edit has effectively removed them from small scale zoom levels of OSM. This would have been better done in conjunction with the Carto-CSS team so that tag changes & enhancements to the rendering chain were implemented together. And messages to mailing lists about such significant changes dont go amiss.
jptolosa (2016-03-18 23:37:23+00:00): Hello SK53, I'm sorry, apparently I had to read more about it. Before my changeset I didn't know that it was a community decision tag Great Lakes as natural=coastline. But I found strange to see Lake Ontario tagged natural=water and Lake Superior tagged both ways. I thought I was helping with a multipolygon conversion (most of people have difficulty with that). Not that I want to impose my viewpoint. I'm available to help if you need revert part of my changesets. About the rendering it's a problem of Mapnik. Could be requested a natural=water rendering in higher zoom levels like natural=coastline.
Regards.
GerdP (2016-01-10 11:01:47+00:00): Hi there!
You have created an invalid
highway=unclassified; tertiary
here. I've changed it to tertiary.
Hope that was what you wanted to do?
See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31932448
woodpeck_repair (2016-01-13 23:32:17+00:00): Edits in this changeset have partly been reverted or modified in 36561697 after complaints to DWG.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-16 19:19:22+00:00): Hello,
There was a duplicate of the "Oceanic Pole of Inaccessibility" here.  I've deleted it.
Cheers,
Andy
Peda (2016-02-01 21:32:54+00:00): Hallo,

Wikipedia stellt leider keine für OpenStreetMap erlaubte Quelle dar. Selbst wenn die Daten der Wikipedia "frei" sind, qualifiziert deren Lizenz leider nicht dazu, sie für OpenStreetMap zu verwenden :(
GerdP (2016-01-10 11:40:07+00:00): Hi there!
Please check this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1795225374
If it is a roundabout I would expect more than two roads connected to it and it should be a circular way with junction=roundabout. Maybe traffic_calming=island 
fits better here?
woodpeck_repair (2016-01-13 23:32:18+00:00): Edits in this changeset have partly been reverted or modified in 36561697 after complaints to DWG.
Peda (2016-02-01 21:30:58+00:00): Hi,

ich habe diesen Changeset nochmal zufällig ausgewählt, selbiges gilt aber auch für viele weitere Changesets von dir: Die von dir verwendete Quelle (die Landkreiszeitung) scheint keine für OpenStreetMap zugelassene Quelle darzustellen und sollte daher aus urheberrechtlichen Gründen keinenfalls verwendet werden. Außer natürlich, du hast dafür die explizite Erlaubnis. Ansonsten hast du da recht großflächig aus einem geschützten Werk abgeschrieben, was für OpenStreetMap ein Problem darstellt. Kannst du das vielleicht aufklären und gegebenenfalls die entsprechenden Daten revertieren? Danke.
deierstoiner (2016-02-12 18:38:34+00:00): Es sind dort keine grafischen Inhalte entnommen, sondern textliche Informationen. Die in eine Karte zu übertragen ist kein "Abschreiben".
SomeoneElse (2016-01-14 14:03:06+00:00): What was the routing problem that was previous reported?  You've changed 2 derelict_canal ways only here; I can't see how that should affect routing?
CloCkWeRX (2016-01-16 08:22:43+00:00): The path was intersecting the waterway; but there was clearly not a bridge etc. 

I split the waterway either side of the bike path to better reflect was is on the ground/apparent from GPS traces, and satellite imagery.

Given that the canal itself is filled in; I don't think it should be mapped - at least not if its indistinguishable from the surrounding terrain.

However, someone clearly when to the effort of mapping it, so splitting it seemed to be the least harmful approach.
SomeoneElse (2016-01-16 13:46:42+00:00): What is the problem with a path intersecting with a derelict_canal?  I can think of several examples locally to me (just a bit north of here) where that happens, where the canal is still very much visible as a derelict_canal but a path crosses it or even runs along it.

Did you try asking the previous mapper about it?  He just lives down the road and I'm sure will be able to explain...
CloCkWeRX (2016-01-16 14:52:11+00:00): Feel free to revert/model it better if you have on the ground observations that are more accurate than the GPS traces and satellite imagery; however *even the original way had it documented that it had been filled in*. 

Routers really shouldn't direct riders through derelict canals without some kind of other structure (bridge, etc), as it usually means they'll fall into a great big empty dry former waterway that looks something like:

https://www.google.com/search?q=derelict+canal&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj115urx67KAhUBHaYKHTVrBDUQ_AUIBygB

As it stands, I really doubt it should be modelled at all - the strava error reports indicate that cyclists aren't aware of a former canal at all; suggesting its not even visible to them.

http://labs.strava.com/routing-errors/#10000000/15/-1.29036/52.95923
MichaelVL (2016-01-09 06:24:48+00:00): Hej.

Jeg syntes ikke det er en god ide, at tegne uforbundne footways på denne måde. I det mindste skal footways være forbundne til de omlæggende veje - tænk på kortet som et rute-kort og ikke som et eksakt billede af virkeligheden. Jeg ville nok selv havde udeladet at tegnet mikro-stier som disse
Hjart (2016-01-09 17:40:39+00:00): Jeg er enig i dette og jeg må lige advare om at hvis J_K fortsætter med at ignorere mine og andres henstillinger, bliver vi altså nødt til at få blokeret din konto.
5m4u9 (2016-01-10 05:08:11+00:00): gracias por editar... pero no es necesario mantener lugares, es preferible eliminarlo.
mavl (2016-01-09 13:42:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Школа искусств правильно была обозначена amenity=training + training = art [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training].  
  
Тег amenity=arts_centre обозначает дома творчества, дома культуры, центры искусств, концертные залы, а здесь именно школа для детей [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Darts_centre]. Не знаю как в вашем регионе, но в Тюменской области все подобные заведения обозначены как amenity=training. В целях единообразия желательно использовать этот тег.  
  
Также буквы в номерах домов принято писать прописные (3А вместо 3а) [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr].
trigpoint (2016-01-09 10:56:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
I think something has gone a little wrong here.
Node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3935403914 is tagged as a bar, it is in the middle of the road, that seems unlikely.
Is way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315460856 really called Stives Place, surely it is St Ives Place?
You have tagged it as oneway, which is impossible for a dead end.
*Martin* (2016-01-10 19:45:08+00:00): Ahoj Peter. Tie potoky su super, ale prosim nedavaj na ne layer=-1. Precitaj si http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer#Things_to_avoid, spomina sa to v siestej odrazke. Dakujem.
Peter Vojtek (2016-01-10 20:01:09+00:00): vdaka za info, skoda ze som to nevedel, uz som ich nahodil dost vela.

rozmyslam ci sa mam pokusat tie waterways ktore som zadal z kapor2 v minulosti fixnut (odstranit layer:-1).

ony maju vsetky spolocne to, ze ako source maju kapor2, ich autor som ja a v commit message maju "add streams ..."

cez overpass QL si viem urcit waterways ktore som editovat ja:

way(user:"Peter Vojtek")
  ["waterway"]
  (47.6904,16.9993,49.8149,22.8698);
out skel;

ale neviem ako to filtrovat na commit message, resp. zdroj (lebo tym ktore maju zdroj:survey chcem layer ponechat).

ked uz mam cez overpass zoznam way IDs, tak si ich viem v JOSM stiahnut cez Download object a vsetkym naraz odstranit layer:-1.
*Martin* (2016-01-10 20:51:55+00:00): S tym source na changesete ti neporadim. Ja zvyknem davat source priamo na objekty. Ale layer=-1 mozes zistovat ci je v kombinacii s tunnel=* a tie neodstranovat. Lebo potoky pod zemou su bud v tuneloch (culvert), alebo len tak v jaskyniach :-).
Peter Vojtek (2016-01-11 19:22:48+00:00): ok, tak som ten layer=-1 odstranil.
josm si prekvapivo dobre poradil zo zoznamom 1300 way IDs.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36510099
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-01-09 11:18:09+00:00): tutaj coś nie styka : -) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3935496062
mapper999 (2016-01-09 12:34:14+00:00): Ein Shop, der erst in ca. 4 Monaten öffnet, sollte mMn noch nicht als shop=* getaggt werden, selbst wenn das start-date in der Zukunft liegt. Das ist für mich zur Zeit maximal proposed:shop=supermarket.
Bert Araali (2021-06-24 01:39:15+00:00): Changed the catholic church back to a basketball field and the fish pond to the water well, according Mapillary survey made in 2017.
woodpeck_repair (2016-01-13 23:32:19+00:00): Edits in this changeset have partly been reverted or modified in 36561697 after complaints to DWG.
mapper999 (2016-01-09 12:26:55+00:00): Hallo Piddi, du hast in diesem Changeset wohl aus Versehen den Kindergarten gelöscht? Außerdem macht es meiner Meinung nach wenig Sinn das Gebäude zusätzlich noch nach dem Kindergarten zu benennen.
user_5359 (2016-01-09 18:22:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Unfortunately, I was forced to revert your changes. I don't think that your intention was to take your entry for the whole Beverly Hills. Please try again or use the note functionality.
mapper999 (2016-01-09 12:29:57+00:00): Naja der Name des Baugebietes und dessen Ausdehnung kann ja durchaus noch als Ortsangabe verwendet werden (z.B. "Ich wohne in der Hockenheimer Flur"), daher sehe ich kein Grund das Baugebiet zu löschen, zumal es nicht als Baugebiet, sondern als "Neighbourhood" eingetragen war.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-28 09:27:53+00:00): Are you sure that e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2791933717/history is really a school?  If you look at the history the comment was "editing polling stations to schools so they can show in map" - that doesn't sound to me like they are actually schools at all.
Best Regards,
Andy
indigomc (2019-09-29 19:23:14+00:00): Hi. No I cannot be sure of this, particularly this particular node since it seems to be clearly out of place, probably on the wrong side of the river and too close to the water edge. However I do remember making this change. Polling stations are temporary here, as in Britain. Most of them are placed in schools across India; 95% or more in my estimation across Karnataka. See http://www.elections.in/polling-stations.html for an example, though this also shows a lack of detail in JK state. I understood editor thevikas was trying to make them stand out for the election. 

In this case however, on looking more closely it is apparent that a lot of the locations seem to be very unlikely settings, such as the suspicious number located in a river channel. I will try to revisit it.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-29 19:50:34+00:00): To be honest, having looked at it a bit more my inclination here would be to revert the original import altogether.  I'm happy to hold off doing that for a few days so that you can investigate a few things first, though.
indigomc (2019-10-02 19:03:28+00:00): I've looked at bit further. I cannot find information on polling stations here now, it might have been removed because of security. The original import probably included some civic offices, as many are in small buildings without playgrounds and the typical infrastructure of a school. Unless the original importer comments, I can't think what else to suggest. Revert all?
SomeoneElse (2019-10-02 19:27:31+00:00): That's what happened with another of their changes (attempts to get in touch didn't work), so I suspect it'll make sense here too.
Chrisss Gü (2016-01-11 21:19:50+00:00): Der Kreisverkehr existiert wirklich und wurde erst neu eingerichtet, ich hab deshalb wieder oneway hinzugefügt.
Viele Grüße
R0bst3r (2016-01-28 15:26:58+00:00): Kurzer Tipp.
Um Gebäude rechtwinklig zu machen, hat jeder OSM Editor eine passende Funktion.
ID macht dies mit der Taste 'S' .
R0bst3r (2016-01-28 15:17:50+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM.
Bei dieser Änderung hast du eine Wiese geändert, dabei hat sich jedoch die Wiese an mehreren Punkten selbst überschnitten. Dies sollte nicht vorkommen.

EIn anderer Mapper hat dies bereits korrigiert.

Grüße
tuxayo (2016-01-16 00:25:35+00:00): Hay problemas con la importación del catastro:

_

Hay un montón(30) de building=warehouse y no párese que sean warehouse sobre el terreno.

Un ejemplo:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390408473

_

Hay un montón(220) de landuse=residential +  landuse=retail

Un ejemplo:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390408654

No es así que hay que usar los landuse. Hay cuasi un micro landuse sobre cada building!

_

Tienes el tiempo de buscar si ha ido mas errores?
tuxayo (2016-01-22 13:41:16+00:00): Abrí la zona con JOSM y use la herramienta de validación de datos. 

_

Hay 139 intercesiones de edificios. Edificios juntos que se solapan en los bordes.

_

Hay 8 edificios adentro de un otro.

_

Un "office" sin "building":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390411267

_

Un edificio añadido sobre una calle que existía antes.

_

Entro todos los landuse (que no tienen razón de existir (debería haber uno muy grande, no 220)) hay 18 con los mismos tags que se solapan.
tuxayo (2016-02-27 12:58:52+00:00): I though it was possible to import parcel data but no:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parcel

- There is no consensus on whether to import them at all
- and even less about how to tag then, so using landuse could be a terrible mistake, preventing to fix tag it properly if an different tag is decided
tuxayo (2020-09-17 15:45:57+00:00): Había problemas de nombres: "Calle Juan Ramon Jimenez" envés de "Calle Juan Ramón Jiménez"
tuxayo (2020-09-17 16:02:57+00:00): Había problemas de nombres:
"Avenida Mairena Aljarafe"
envés de
"Avenida de Mairena del Aljarafe"
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-02-10 01:23:53+00:00): Hi KJSime,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/390408944).
Thank you, happy mapping!