piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dieterdreist (2017-10-12 10:01:54+00:00): Are you sure that "Manhattan" is not "place=suburb" according to the OSM definition of this tag? For legacy reasons this isn't the same as a suburb in natural language (which would be: "below a city", sub - urbs). In OSM it is "Use place=suburb to identify a major area in a place=town or place=city with a distinct and recognised local name and identity. Suburbs may have uncertain boundaries, may overlap with other suburbs, and are often best mapped using a node.". I.E. place for settlements is following socio-geographic concepts, while the word "county", although in the "place" key, seems to be duplicating administrative concepts.
dieterdreist (2017-10-12 10:08:55+00:00): There is also already a place=county object for Manhattan, which seems to contain the administrative boundaries:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2552485
And there is already another place=suburb object for Manhattan as well: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357644127
I suggest you discuss on your local mailing list (or whereever the comunity is) how to deal with this (likely some tags have to be merged and one of the objects should go. My preference would be to keep the older one and move missing tags to them).
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 20:01:52+00:00): " Removing duplicated [name:fa] tags with exact same value of [name] tag." - why you did this?

It is a very useful information, with that we know what is the language of the name.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:02:10+00:00): Hello jseigneuret. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527859339 you have introduced the new lifecycle prefix `futur` (misspelled, too?). Please have a look at 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix #newkey
jseigneuret (2017-09-28 17:55:57+00:00): Hi, I have replace by construction:landuse=residential in accordance with lifecycle
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:03:01+00:00): Hello neo-plan. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5130965352 you have tagged `imscription` instead of `inscription`, right? #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:13:11+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5130968907 `nscription`
neo-plan (2017-09-28 17:31:23+00:00): Yes, a mistake. Now everything is fixed.
Constable (2017-09-27 07:02:55+00:00): Ciao, grazie per aver aggiunto tutti questi negozi. Vorrei segnalarti due cose: 1, quando come in questo caso ti trovi a dover modificare più oggetti della mappa, se vuoi puoi modificarli tutti e poi salvare il lavoro una sola volta, non 6 come hai fatto tu. Il risultato è il medesimo, però dovresti riuscire a risparmiare un po' di tempo.
2, il Roadhouse andrebbe taggato come fast food o ristorante (magari controlla gli altri della zona come sono taggati), il tag attuale amenity=food_court indica un'area con tavoli condivisa tra più ristoranti/bar/cafe,..., siccome però sulla mappa non risultano altre attività simili, io lo mapperei come fast_food il roadhouse e nel caso dovesse essere aggiunto qualche altro ristorante si potrebbe creare un punto a metà tra i due e mapparlo come food_court.
Ciao, buon lavoro!
mascalzone67 (2017-09-28 05:48:40+00:00): Gentile Constable, ti ringrazio delle tue indicazioni. Io sono sostanzialmente inesperto e quindi ogni suggerimento è prezioso. L'unico dato che manca è l'indicazione complessiva dell'area che viene identificata sulle pubblicità che leggo come centro commerciale Nov'aria. Grazie ancora e ciao.
Constable (2017-10-03 16:13:19+00:00): Ciao, scusa il ritardo. Quello che intendevo io riguardava strettamente il roadhouse http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5130959790, al posto di amenity=food_court io userei il tag amenity=fast_food.
Per quanto riguarda il nome Nov'aria, dipende da cosa è inteso come centro commerciale. Nov'aria è questo edificio con dentro i 5 negozi oppure tutta l'area, Esselunga e Obi compresi? Nel primo caso andrebbe taggato come mall (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmall) solo l'edificio in questione, nel secondo caso invece io mapperei tutta l'area come landuse=retail e gli darei nome Nov'aria.
Già che ci siamo, in zona dovrebbe aprire anche un Obi e da quel che ricordo dovrebbe sorgere nella parte di parcheggio vicina a via Comazzi, confermi?
Grazie, ciao
mascalzone67 (2017-10-04 06:03:47+00:00): I suggerimenti e le precisazioni sono sempre ben accette. Ho eseguito la prima modifica. Per quanto riguarda il cc Nov'aria è solo quest'edifico con i cinque negozi. Esselunga e Obi sono a parte. Confermo l'apertura di Obi verso la via Comazzi e già che ci siamo ti annuncio anche la prossima apertura di un cinema multisala (notizie dalla Stampa). Inoltre in prossimità della rotonda via Comazzi- via Pavesi sorgerà un distributore con gpl e lavaggio auto.
mascalzone67 (2017-10-04 06:04:07+00:00): Grazie e ciao
mascalzone67 (2017-10-04 06:06:32+00:00): Se hai tempo e voglia puoi vedere la modiifica che ho fatto (e il relativo disastro!) a Vercelli per segnalare Amazon (via Nelson Mandela) e la via Rita Levi Montalcini? Grazie e ciao
mascalzone67 (2017-10-04 06:07:22+00:00): Io vorrei segnalare una rotonda di recentissima costruzione sulla ss11. Come debbo fare? Rigrazie e ciao
Constable (2017-10-04 06:43:02+00:00): ciao, andiamo con ordine.
Roadhouse, fatto, ottimo
Nov'aria, adesso lo aggiungo io come nome dell'edificio che contiene i 5 negozi
Obi lo aggiungerei quasi ma non vedendolo dalle immagini satellitari non so di preciso quale sia la sua posizione, quindi se passo a breve controllo, idem per il multisala e il distributore
Per quanto riguarda la rotonda puoi fare in due modi:
1) modifichi la mappa e la aggiungi
2) se non ti senti sicuro, non sai come mapparla, .... apri una nota nel punto esatto, indicando che è stata costruita una rotonda, poi non ti resta che attendere qualche mappatore volenteroso che prenda a cuore la tua segnalazione e aggiunga la rotonda. Per aggiungere una nota devi cliccare il penultimo tasto sulla destra dello schermo e trascinare il puntatore blu nel punto esatto.
Appena riesco controllo Amazon a Vercelli, in particolare cosa vuoi che guardi?
grazie, ciao
Matthew Darwin (2017-09-27 12:59:41+00:00): Are you sure that road is now opened?  Last month when I did a survey it was not.
caueguerra (2017-09-27 13:20:41+00:00): I bought a house in this new community. I go there twice a week to see its progress. It is open and accessible to the public
Matthew Darwin (2017-09-27 13:48:37+00:00): Excellent.  Hopefully you can keep this new neighbourhood map up-to-date.
caueguerra (2017-09-27 13:50:49+00:00): You bet :)
Zverik (2018-03-02 08:18:49+00:00): Hi, I assume this runway was imported from http://maps.aopa.ru/#lon/31.756748/lat/59.066980/z/13/ll/a/bl/gm/p/7636/mode/r

As you can see on the website, there is no runway there: it's just an ad for a hotel nearby, masked as an aerodrome.

Which makes me question other edits you've made using data from that website. Are you sure there is no other errors like this one?

Ilya
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 10:37:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527866996, похоже, нарисован от балды. или это просто массовый импорт откуда-то?
CupIvan (2021-10-20 10:46:52+00:00): вручную деревни обводил place=*, этот полигон не знаю даже откуда взялся, реально не соответствует карте
SomeoneElse (2017-09-26 16:07:36+00:00): Hello Fingrmouse and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I think something's gone a bit wrong at least up near:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31699323#map=18/53.13117/-1.03334&layers=C
The Southwell Trail relation was composed of several different parts, some of whicj were former railway and some of which weren't.  They've now been merged together so some bits are now incorrectly tagged as abandoned railway when they aren't.  What change were you trying to make here - maybe I can help fix things up?
Best Regards,
Andy
Fingrmouse (2017-09-26 16:18:11+00:00): The Southwell Trail is entirely based on an abandoned railway - there's no section of the trail doesn't run along an old rail route. The main West-Southeast route was part of the Midland Railway and the most northerly section near Bilsthorpe was where it transitioned into LM&SR / LNER routes. The trail is a continuous route, not comprised of separate parts - it runs six feet from my house and I spend a lot of time on it, so it seems odd that it was previously broken into individual sections on OSM. If there's strong disagreement then I've no problem rolling any changes back but the Abandoned Railway/Bridleway designation does seem apply to the whole thing. As far as I know it's not classified differently depending on administrative areas, but I can check with the Friends of the Trail if necessary.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-26 16:32:51+00:00): The northern bit (just south of the Car park in Bilsthorpe) is a bit to the west of where the main rail lines were I think - see https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=18&lat=53.131153&lon=-1.033118 .  Obviously it's a bit tricky here - bridleways and railways are linear features and here quite a width was occupied by the former railway.
The reason why things are "broken into sections" in OSM is because they have different attributes - as an example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31699331/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31699015/history had a different layer tag and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34145956/history had a bridge tag.  It's perfectly normal for this to happen.
Alexander-II (2017-10-31 23:04:41+00:00): А для чего вы у https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1027322846 указали memorial_1=statue? Там memorial=statue уже указано.
Alexander-II (2017-11-01 15:24:49+00:00): Кажется, это особенность редактора iD. Там уже был тег memorial=statue, вы его вписали еще раз. И чтобы не затереть существующий, iD сохранил новый как memorial_1=statue
soemisch (2017-10-24 07:22:50+00:00): Hi, Jarek, thank you for your concern. U-Bhf is an old abbreviation for underground stations in Berlin. So I used them for all entrances. But it's all right when we use new ones.
I'm agree when you know the names of entrance and use and please correct them.
Thank you and best wishes, Lars
Jarek 🚲 (2019-01-15 17:43:23+00:00): record keeping: soemisch's comment was a response to my comment on his https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52469103
Flayer (2017-09-26 16:23:26+00:00): Done
zstadler (2017-10-02 06:18:18+00:00): Thanks for the fix!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 15:48:34+00:00): Hallo L-Klitschi. Bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5131129979 sollte es wohl ein `clothes` anstelle von `clothers` werden, oder? #typo
L-Klitschi (2017-09-28 17:15:10+00:00): Hai Harald, ja hast Recht, habe das geändert...
Danke Dir für den Hinweis
Gruss Lars
mueschel (2017-10-02 09:38:18+00:00): Hi,
on 71 nodes you added some new keys:
is_in:dist=Ilam
is_in:vdc=Shantipur
These are not used in other places. I guess that the first one can be replaced with the more common is_in:district; but I don't know what to the second key refers to. Could you check this?

Cheers, Jan
WojtekK (2017-10-02 11:08:12+00:00): Hello Jan, right -  is_in:dist will be replaced with is_in:district, VDC is shortcut for Nepal administrative unit (Village Development Comitee).
rab (2017-09-26 17:44:16+00:00): Hi, please use DigitalGlobe Standard as it is the most recent imagery source here. Remove this Building because its not there anymore
www.openstreetmap.org/way/527889511#map=19/-17.38943/15.89105
And please bring the ways in order again.
Thank You
OF0 (2017-11-29 16:04:32+00:00): Ich finde es nicht in Ordnung, dass Du "Verklebungen" reduzierst. Das entspricht dem Wiki und ist hier üblich. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
lfemak (2018-01-02 11:51:57+00:00): .  
Hallo OF0,
.
Danke für Dein Interesse an meiner Änderung und Deine/n Anmerkung/Hinweis zu meiner Änderung.  
  
Ich sehe gerade, ich habe mich nicht ganz stimmig ausgedrückt (Verklebungen reduziert), es sollte wohl etwas genauer bedeuten "Grasflächen detaillierter abgebildet / somit einhergehende Verklebung der Grasflächenabgrenzung zur Strassenmitte (z.B. highway=tertiary) gelöst". Ich hoffe dieser Kommentar macht es etwas deutlicher. Ich bin nicht sicher, ob es sinnvoll ist, solche langen Änderungssatz-Kommentare zu verwenden. Wie machst Du das so?  
.  
Ein Beispielobjekt (way 527891477 – eine Grasfläche) aus dem Änderungssatz:  
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/527891477  
.  
Ich finde es nicht in Ordnung, dass Du ein von mir detaillierter (welches die Realität on-the-ground etwas genauer abbildet) gezeichnetes Element (way 527891477) auf eine vorherige weiniger realitätsgetreue Version änderst.
.  
Danke für den wiki-Verweis!  
.  
Viele Grüsse  
lm
OF0 (2018-01-02 18:49:13+00:00): [...]  Ich sehe gerade, ich habe mich nicht ganz stimmig ausgedrückt (Verklebungen reduziert), [...]

"Verklebungen reduzieren" anstatt zum Beispiel "Teilen von Nodes durch Wege und Flächen" zu schreiben, lässt darauf schließen, dass es Dir einzig darum geht möglichst bequem zu editieren. Du disqualifizierst damit alle danach von Dir vorgetragenen Argumente. Sie wirken jetzt nur noch konstruiert um diese Tatsache zu verschleiern.

Das Beitragen zu OSM setzt einen gewissen Fleiß voraus.

Das, das Du als etwas das die Realität on the ground etwas genauer abbilden soll bezeichnest, bewirkt genau das Gegenteil. Nur die Flächentreue der Grasfläche wird dadurch genauer dargestellt. Du solltest Dich von der Vorstellung lösen, die Straßenfläche durch "Nichtmappen" darstellen zu wollen. Der Renderer müsste das width-Attribut des highways auswerten und entsprechend verdrängen. Durch Deine Technik besteht ein nicht vorhandener Zwischenraum zwischen dem Weg und der Fläche weiter. Diese stehen somit nicht mehr in ihrer realen Beziehung zueinander.
Du wunderst Dich, dass jemand Deine in der Region vollkommen unübliche Änderungen auf eine vorherige den örtlichen Gepflogenheiten entsprechende Version zurücksetzt? Du wunderst Dich, dass jemand die selben Methoden wie Du anwendet?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 15:56:06+00:00): Hello Amy Murcia. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526829620 you have introduced the new key `El Verdugo`. Did you mean `landuse` instead? #newkey
Hjart (2017-09-26 17:39:47+00:00): Jeg vil mene det er en fejl at fjerne tags fra de egentlige ydermure. Den der landuse=construction dækker jo mere end det egentlige fængsel
AE35 (2017-09-26 17:42:43+00:00): Draw the prison as closed way for the prison's outline (land in preference to buildings).
Hjart (2017-09-26 17:45:53+00:00): Det var jo også tilfældet før. Ydermurene er jo ikke bygninger i den forstand.
AE35 (2017-09-26 17:47:03+00:00): Det er fængselgrunden og ikke bygningerne
Hjart (2017-09-26 17:49:43+00:00): Den polygon du fjernede tags fra omsluttede jo det egentlige fængsel med bygninger mm
AE35 (2017-09-26 17:51:48+00:00): Nej der er en ydre grænse mere
AE35 (2017-09-26 17:57:01+00:00): Hvorfor ændrer du pludselig standpunkt med at ydremure ikke er del af fængsel for at ændre til udsagn " fjernede tags fra omsluttede jo det egentlige fængsel med bygninger mm" - men igen så er OSM wiki helt forkert på den? og dem der har kortlagt indtil videre har gjort det helt galt i følge dig?
Hjart (2017-09-26 18:02:48+00:00): Jeg ændrede da ikke standpunkt? og er heller ikke (i dette tilfælde) uenig med wiki.
AE35 (2017-09-26 18:50:36+00:00): Der er ikke noget at diskutere. Jeg har ret, og du tager fejl«.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:31:02+00:00): Hello ctjuggler. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5131254867
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5131254868
you have tagged `web site` instead of `website`, right? #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:22:19+00:00): Hello Publicate. You have introduced the new key `PUBLICATE`. What is it for? I think you can remove the complete node, because only the name (without shop, amenity or something) is nothing worth about it ;-)
czubi (2019-07-05 12:00:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1810940
TheOutpost (2017-10-13 19:38:38+00:00): Hi There,

I saw some buildings that you traced into OSM as building=house. Note that this is an incorrect tag and that it really should be building=yes.

Thank you nonetheless for your contributions : )

Nick
Beddhist (2019-01-01 05:12:40+00:00): Ways 527906916 & 527906918:

You made that a residential road, but it connects to a highway via a pre-existing alley. Normally, you don't make a connection like this through a lower class road. (There are exceptions; I have seen stranger things in Thailand.) So, you should look at all available images and either upgrade the existing connection to residential, or draw your new road the same, i.e. as an alley.

The road looks like a very narrow single lane, so I believe alley is appropriate here.

A nice bridge you have drawn across the river here. But, switch off the OSM layer and I have to ask: when was the last time you saw trees and other vegetation cover most of a bridge? Looking at Bing, it looks very much like a dam to me. If you zoom out you can see that this is an old river bed here. To the West you can clearly see a weir and lock gates, so a dam is not just possible here, but very likely. Looking at the dam on DGS I can't see clearly, but on Bing there is a way of some sort on top of the dam, so it's not unreasonable to draw an alley here.

Clearly, there are a lot of people living on this river island. For them this would be the shortest way to get to the highway in the East. Clearly, this road is too small to carry this kind of traffic, which leads me to believe that it is not open to the public. We have to be extra careful when drawing such shortcuts, as they can get people stuck with their vehicles in back alleys.

In summary, I'm going to replace the bridge with a dam, make the road an alley and for now I'm also breaking the road here, until I can get there myself to have a look.

Before:
https://i.postimg.cc/R0td9zkJ/Image-6.png

After:
https://i.postimg.cc/HxC2khmZ/Image-7.png

Thanks for your time,
Peter.
RVR002 (2019-01-02 18:35:54+00:00): Hi Peter,

Thanks for the very detailed feedback. This sort of local knowledge is always valuable. The way only being clear in some of the imagery is suspicious and worth waiting on ground truthing. These all seem like reasonable changes to ensure the best experience of OSM users. 

-Jeff
eggie (2017-09-26 18:06:04+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-26 18:09:54+00:00): Water in landuse forest tekenen is best ingewikkeld in het begin. Ik kijk er zo even naar.
Het hoort in een zogenaamde multipolygon relatie getekend te worden. Niet voor starters dus. Je blijft de bomen in het water zien.
eggie (2017-09-26 18:29:43+00:00): Bos aangepast en water in multipolygon opgenomen
De Beer (2017-09-26 18:36:51+00:00): Ik weet zeker dat ik de aanvulling goed heb uitgevoerd. Ik wandel regelmatig door dit gebied, vandaar. Ben wel een nieuweling met OpenStreetMaps, maar geen beginneling als kartograaf. (Topografische Dienst)
De Beer (2017-09-26 18:39:48+00:00): Je bedoelt vlak in vlak natuurlijk
eggie (2017-09-26 18:42:59+00:00): Het is ook helemaal prima en klopt precies, maar het probleem is dat in OSM water op land niet goed werkt. Er liggen immers geen bomen onder water. we zetten dan iets in een multipolygon.
De landuse komt op de outer relatie. Die zie je dus niet meer bij de tags. het water staat op de innerrelatie. Wanneer je de rand van het bos pkat met de muis dan zie je het water oplichten. dat hoort bij elkaar.
Je zou eigenlijk zo snel mogelijk over moeten stappen op editor JOSM, want anders kun je niet goed aan water en landuse werken.
Een eilandje tekenen komt bv ook niet op de afgeleide kaarten. ook dan MP's. 
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2017-09-26 18:44:23+00:00): De bomen zie ik al verdwijnen.
eggie (2017-09-26 18:48:33+00:00): Dit was mijn edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52393476
Het water ligt nu in een groter vlak.
eggie (2017-09-26 18:13:48+00:00): Probeer concreet  te zijn in je edits anders wordt het voor andere mappers een raadsel.
Dus natural water toegevoegd. Ook hier geldt dat het in een relatie getekend moet worden. Dat gaar niet goed met editor iD. Lees je goed in en probeer met simpele zaken te beginnen. Bankjes, winkels, .. en vraag hulp op het forum. Zie welkomstmail. 
Ik zet de edits wel in een multipolygon relatie outer en inner.
eggie (2017-09-26 18:33:56+00:00): Water in multirelatie gezet
eggie (2017-09-26 18:58:46+00:00): In het begin volgen wij startende mappers.. uiteraard ook om te helpen. Op het forum van OSM zit veel knowhow. 
Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust. 
 
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
gurglypipe (2017-09-27 10:14:22+00:00): Nice work!
lakedistrict (2017-09-27 11:47:38+00:00): Thanks!
gurglypipe (2017-09-27 10:12:49+00:00): Use landmark=cairn man_made=cairn instead. I’ve now fixed this.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:26:17+00:00): Hello monk10. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479216014 you have introduced the new key `sidewalk_2`. I think you can remove it, right? #newkey
gurglypipe (2017-09-27 10:13:13+00:00): Use highway=path since it’s an off-road path. I’ve now fixed this.
joost schouppe (2017-09-29 06:59:18+00:00): Merci pour l'ajout du nom. Aucun probleme ici :)
On pourra encore ajouter la "denomination": http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 15:19:03+00:00): Hello FerchoCR. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526829625 you have introduced the new key `apartamentos`. Did you mean `building=apartments` or `tourism=apartment` instead? #newkey
Please have a look at the wiki and/or https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:15:27+00:00): Hello de vries. At 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2966475623
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2966476473
you have introduced the new key `ODS:validator`. What is it for? Is it really meaningful data for public? #newkey
de vries (2017-09-28 17:48:31+00:00): It's a mistake. I'll fix it. Thanks for noticing.
joost schouppe (2017-09-29 07:03:04+00:00): Ici il y a des problemes. Tu a ajouté glaces=Glaces au batiment, qui est shop=farm (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfarm), un magasin au ferme. Aparament, il y a aussi un café specialisé en glaces et crepes? Ou comment decivrera tu l'endroit?
eggie (2017-09-26 18:32:00+00:00): Hier is het geen enkel probleem, want er is geen landuse  om rekening mee te houden. Wanneer je mapt voor het Rode Kruis svp inloggen via HOT OSM. dan wordt je werk gecontroleerd.
n76 (2017-09-26 23:57:45+00:00): Hi!

Welcome to editing OpenStreetMap. I've been mapping in San Clemente and noticed you new contribution.

I think you are trying to show the area you live in but the node you added with the adjacent street name in all lower case is not the best way to do that.

It would probably be better to put nodes on each of the buildings (or draw the outlines of them) and then put some address tags on the. For example addr:street="Calle Cuervo".

If you like, I can either help you learn some of the usual editing conventions. Or, if you like I could meet you and we could work on getting your whole neighborhood mapped better.

I am the one who walked Avenida Salvador near there and added those houses and addresses to the map. It would be great if we could get your neighborhood done too.

Again, welcome to editing OSM!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 15:50:25+00:00): Hallo skunk. Was bitte willst du mit `commemorates:wikipedia` aussagen? Reicht nur `wikipedia` nicht? #newkey #typo
skunk (2017-09-28 19:52:03+00:00): So wird's auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial empfohlen (um genau zu sein wikidata, aber es gibt den Eintrag bei wikidata glaub ich nicht).

`wikipedia` alleine ist falsch, weil der Wikipedia Artikel den Jubiläumstempel beschreibt und nicht das Denkmal (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_Wikipedia_links).
Gppes (2018-02-08 08:02:21+00:00): Hi, ich glaube dass Deine Eintragung zur Feuerwehrinfrastruktur im Moment nicht optimal ist. Gibt es hier mittlerweile (oder vielleicht immer schon) OSM-konformere Moeglichkeiten Deine Eintragungen zu realisieren? Lg, Gppes