piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sloyment (2022-09-04 23:17:38+00:00): I have read the wiki page. Two thoughts:

1. This doesn’t seem to be an official policy OF the OSM community, but merely a request TOWARDS the OSM community. If it were an official policy, this would be a reason to fork OSM.

2. The reasoning on the wiki page doesn’t even apply here. These buildings are intended as residential buildings, not for military use. They are not built by the Ukrainian army. And Russia doesn’t get any additional information. They already know where these buildings are, because Mariupol is Russian controlled territory.
Emilius123 (2022-08-28 21:32:30+00:00): oops, wrong account btw :(
Ruediger123 (2024-08-28 06:50:20+00:00): :(
Emilius123 (2024-08-28 06:56:17+00:00): Still sad two years later :(
maro21 (2022-09-27 21:49:01+00:00): Proszę nie pisać wersalikami nazw, które nie są akronimami.
nowak (2022-09-28 10:33:22+00:00): Sklepy nazywają się ALDI, proszę o przywrócenie poprawnej pisowni. Jeśli aplikacje literują nazwę, to można użyć name:pronunciation.
maraf24 (2022-09-28 12:11:01+00:00): Bazując na https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldi 
- zapis "Aldi" jest poprawny i pożądany w OSM.
nowak (2022-09-28 12:25:46+00:00): Możesz uzasadnić?

Materiały tej sieci używają nazwy ALDI. Szyld na sklepie: ALDI.

OSM Name Suggestion Identifier wskazuje na "ALDI": https://nsi.guide/?t=brands
maro21 (2022-09-28 19:09:39+00:00): Szyldy bardzo często pisane są wielkimi literami, ale szyld to szyld. Sklepy Lidl, Deichmann, Rossmann, Lewiatan itd. też są zapisywane wersalikami w logo i na szyldach, a w OSM mamy zapisane normalnie.
Kirstukas (2022-08-28 21:29:12+00:00): imagery_used:
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/67067/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/67059/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/67060/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/67061/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/67062/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/67063/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/67064/{z}/{x}/{y}.png);
Custom (https://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/67068/{z}/{x}/{y}.png)
Allison P (2022-08-28 21:29:36+00:00): As I have figured out a reliable method to catch all of these errors before submitting the changeset, future changesets will just be labeled "conflation". Note that this method does not work in areas with mixed housing (read: older parts of towns).
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-21 20:58:46+00:00): Why did you change the cartpaths that were correctly mapped into service roads without the cartpath tags?

Such as:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587935762/history

These should be changed back to cartpaths with path tags.
Mashin (2023-04-21 22:15:37+00:00): They had golf_cart=designated access tag, which indicates who can use them. I feel like the not approved golf=cartpath was just created by TGC mappers for their own purpose.
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:17:07+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
eggie (2022-08-29 18:40:43+00:00): Dag Teek ...  Wellicht ben je een stuk zonder enige landuse 'vergeten'. Ik heb het ingevuld al landuse=meadow. 
Het gebied ten oosten van knooppunt Uitgeest 10

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-29 19:14:29+00:00): Mijn advies is toch echt om eerst zaken af te maken zoals bv op Texel. Dat lijkt me wel handig voor het overzicht en je krijgt ook geen kaalslag.

Groet
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
Basstoelpel (2023-04-02 16:50:10+00:00): Hallo PfeLars,

nach welcher Quelle hast Du hier die 220 kV wieder ergänzt?

Baßtölpel
Basstoelpel (2022-12-03 22:45:06+00:00): Hallo PfeLars,

nach was für einer "knowledge" hast Du die Leitung wieder hergestellt? Lokales Wissen kanns nicht gewesen sein.  Wissen über die seit Jahren laufenden Erweiterungen des Stromnetzes kanns auch nicht sein.

Baßtölpel
emersonveenstra (2022-08-29 09:52:25+00:00): Hi,

Please don't name holes "Hole 1", etc. That's bad practice (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls). Would you mind removing those? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-09-09 11:28:53+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125977866
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:17:26+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
Piskvor (2022-09-07 08:08:11+00:00): Ahoj, cože je tady za parcel_pickup na tý benzínce? Zásilkovna to nemá jako výdejní místo...
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-09-07 08:34:12+00:00): Já nevím přesně co tam je, tady to bylo jako jediné se značkou vending=parcel_pickup mimo automaty na zásilky
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-09-07 08:44:55+00:00): Je tam Balíkovna https://www.postaonline.cz/detail-pobocky/-/pobocky/detail/53810
Piskvor (2022-09-09 06:26:15+00:00): Aha, díky...jak to zmapovat, aby to bylo zjevný už z tagů? 🤔
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-09-09 07:51:58+00:00): Že by nějak takhle? Hledal jsem skrz website na TagInfo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7319889912
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-09-16 13:52:38+00:00): Další výdejní a podací místa Zásilkovny co jsem našel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9447303268 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9542943944 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7188767125 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7295308519 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7246122760 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8450360862
Tady u Balíkovny v Seči bych to viděl na vytvoření samostatného uzlu a ani nevím o tom, že by byly některé zmapovány. Aspoň podle toho udělám tu Zásilkovnu v Žižkově.
Dimitar155 (2022-08-29 06:53:42+00:00): Hello beatnickgr,

The 30 km/h maxspeed signs that you've seen apply until the crossing. After that, the normal speed limit of the road returns. They are placed on purpose to slow down cars and to not break their suspensions since some raised crossing act like trampoline. I've fixed them for you.

Best regards,
Dimitar
sheldonelectric (2022-08-29 10:10:57+00:00): You're right, it was a mistake of mine. The ones coming from the intersection haven't seen any speedlimit sign and drive at normal speed.
P1L (2022-08-28 23:49:18+00:00): Needs to be changed to path not footway.
Dodko (2022-09-01 07:14:32+00:00): Neviem či je potrebné každý fliačik označovať značkou parkoviska.
Je to potom prepchaté
https://pl.mapy.cz/s/dapuhuloko
Filip009 (2024-10-29 15:37:49+00:00): Prečo sú rampy na priecestí semaformi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9984272747
NieWnen (2022-09-17 11:18:46+00:00): Można przerzucić na proposed:name, jeśli takie nazwy mają obowiązywać (i jeśli jest to w miarę pewne). Usunąłeś network, ale zostało network:wikidata

Poprawiłem tagowanie.
P1L (2022-08-28 23:26:01+00:00): Also added all of Laurel Run Trail, parking, trailhead. Wolf Rock trail is on a different trace, but I placed the south trailhead for now.
P1L (2022-08-28 23:47:42+00:00): Needs to be changed to path and not footway.
BCNorwich (2022-09-02 07:40:39+00:00): You're duplicating many sections of highway which disrupts routing. Please, if a way needs amending only amend the existing way. Please don't map a highway atop a highway, nor delete and redraw highways to correct them.
I've removed several duplicated highways.
Regards Bernard.
mycota (2022-09-02 18:01:26+00:00): Thanks for catching this. I got a JOSM error when uploading this changeset. I used the option to synchronize the data, and that must have duplicated the ways. I'll see if I can find any other duplicated ways and delete them.
scai (2024-07-01 07:03:00+00:00): Hi Makkaroni,

die Tankstelle (amenity=fuel) war bereits am Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39130734). Sie beim landuse nochmal zu ergänzen führt zum doppelten POI. Entweder an dem einen oder an dem anderen Element, aber nicht bei beiden gleichzeitig.

Ich lösche das Tankstellen-Tag daher wieder vom landuse.

Grüße
Alex
Makkaroni_100 (2024-07-03 20:32:29+00:00): Hi Alex,

danke für den Hinweis. Das ist richtig und ungünstig. Habe ich nicht bedacht.

Generell ist natürlich die Frage, ob die Fläche die Tankstelle ist oder das Gebäude, aber das ist eine andere Frage, auf die es keine allgemeingültige Anwort gibt.
scai (2024-07-03 20:40:45+00:00): Ja, das ist mal so und mal so umgesetzt. Beides ist in Ordnung, denke ich, und sollte daher nicht ohne Not geändert werden.
mariotomo (2022-08-30 14:33:47+00:00): hola, bienvenido a OSM, y que bien que puedas mejorar el mapa basado en observaciones directas. hay pocos maperos locales en Panamá!
cuidado con no repetir objetos reales, dándole múltiples representaciones en la base de datos OSM.
(por lo general, es preferible poner la extensión de la escuela, y darle etiqueta amenity=school, quizás con la cerca como barrier=*, y los edificios uno por uno. Si hay senderos cubiertos, mejor ponerlos como líneas, y etiqueta highway=footway;covered=yes.)

ten en cuenta: OSM además que un mapa, es una base de datos geográficos, y tiene toda una galaxia de comunidades que la realizan. por ejemplo: community.osm.org, https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61, https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama. estás invitado a mirar y buscar otros maperos del área.
Josuer (2024-05-08 01:02:34+00:00): Hola Oliver, 
Agregaste addr street de la Escuela Cerro Viento Rural, sin embargo no añadiste el nombre de la calle a la que refieres. No sé si se trata de la vialidad al norte o al poniente de la escuela.
SomeoneElse (2022-08-29 01:11:15+00:00): Under what licence is the housenumber data for e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/440214686 released?
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-29 01:24:32+00:00): Картографические данные, предоставленные location LocationCapture By ATXLDN, предоставляются/отправляются в OSM в соответствии с лицензией Open Database License (ODbL) и предоставляются бесплатно для использования OSM и ее сообществом.
SomeoneElse (2022-08-29 01:53:26+00:00): It is not possible to "licence wash" data like that.  Where did you obtain the data from and under what licence?  Who or what is "LocationCapture By ATXLDN"?
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-29 02:09:19+00:00): ATXLDN/Location Capture предоставил OSM эти данные под ODbL и является бесплатными данными с открытым исходным кодом для OSM для использования из нашей внутренней базы данных никто не «отмывал какие-либо лицензии», пожалуйста, воздержитесь от 
 предположения.
SomeoneElse (2022-08-29 02:18:03+00:00): ok, when did you survey it then?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
AkuAnakTimur (2022-08-29 09:28:10+00:00): Adjacent streets nearby bear the pattern of Jalan Utama x, surely that would definitely be Jalan Orkid x?

https://kartaview.org/details/5977785/0/track-info
Frans S (2022-09-19 10:57:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please pay attention to this point:
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Best regards
emersonveenstra (2022-09-03 16:14:30+00:00): Hi,

Trail names must be the actual name of the trail. If you do not know the name of the trail, please do not put a ?, just leave it as is. Thanks.
eserte (2022-08-29 20:15:44+00:00): Bei der Zachenberger Straße muss ich nachfragen: ist da tatsächlich ein Spielstraßenschild? Auf deinen Mapillary-Bildern vom 21.8.2022 sehe ich nichts...
StefanHRT (2022-08-29 21:40:11+00:00): Da hast Du recht, hatte dort auf alles andere geachtet (z.B. die Feuerwehrzufahrten etc.) aber nicht ob die vorherige Wegeart stimmt. ist geändert.
cyton (2023-02-23 18:04:48+00:00): ich nehme an, die noexit=yes sind um die warnungen stumm zu bekommen? wirklich brauchen tut man das ja nicht
StefanHRT (2023-02-24 07:33:27+00:00): Ja genau, damit die Warnmeldungen weg sind und andere keine fiktiven Verbindungen aufbauen wenn diese real nicht existieren. Da es den Wert gibt, kann man ihn auch nutzen, aber Du kannst ja gerne die Sinnhaftigkeit mit Alex & Co in der Gruppe besprechen und je nach Resultat die Werte hier und auch anderswo entfernen wenn Sie stören.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-17 10:44:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126293114 where the changeset comment is: Revert spam - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6371
Diacritic (2022-08-29 09:00:29+00:00): Hi Melb_guy,

As discussed, we can't use the source provided to update imagery, as it is incompatible with the OSM data license.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125502208
Diacritic (2022-08-29 09:00:42+00:00): Hi Melb_guy,

As discussed, we can't use the source provided to update imagery, as it is incompatible with the OSM data license.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125502208
kuhni74 (2023-01-10 11:13:15+00:00): Are the "villas" touristic uses? If yes, they should be tagged as apartments / hotels etc. (like in Casa Fabiano)
Himbeergeist (2023-01-10 11:52:42+00:00): Likely yes, but I don't know.
Please note booking them is AFAIK not possible locally, but needs to be done in advance. You cannot travel there and expect to find lodging without previously negotiating with the owners or keepers. Therefore tagging them as apartments provides little additional information in my opinion.
kuhni74 (2023-01-10 15:09:06+00:00): My impression is that booking in advance is the case in many apartments that are mapped as apartments here. Would this really be a reason not to map them as apartments?
Himbeergeist (2023-01-10 15:42:09+00:00): I don't really know this area well. I was there on holiday. My main objective was to add house numbers, because they are non-intuitive. I also only added those I could find when looking from the street. I don't want to add information I'm not sure about.
kuhni74 (2023-01-10 15:46:19+00:00): I'm a tourist, too (und ich glaube auch, dass wir die gleiche Muttersprache haben), and I agree that uncertain information should not be mapped.
4004 (2022-08-30 09:12:20+00:00): здравствуйте, Стансислав. впредь пожалуйста не удаляйте здания ваших старых офисов, если только вы их не сносите когда переезжаете
Станислав (Ресурсконтроль) (2022-08-30 09:19:16+00:00): Добрый день! Не проблема, проинструктируйте, как делать правильно, будем делать правильно.
4004 (2022-08-30 09:31:36+00:00): разумеется. если хотите, можете просто оставять заметки с просьбами о исправлениях - это возможно с главной страницы openstreetmap.org, кнопка в правой панели.
если желаете редактировать, советую пройти какое то начальное ознакомление с редактором - в режиме редактирования справа снизу есть кнопка книжки, в ней базовые знания и короткий курс.
если хотите что то удалить, учтите, что обьект вроде здания может нести в себе как атрибуты здания, так и атрибуты организации в этом здании (если она занимает большую его часть).
в таких случая достаточно удалить название организации и теги office=*. 
по вашему старому адресу изначально была ошибка в отметке всей многоэтажки как здания с названием вашей компании - в таких случаях принято ставить отдельный элемент точка, и уже ему задавать атрибуты организации (как это сделано по вашему новому адресу)
Станислав (Ресурсконтроль) (2022-08-30 10:07:17+00:00): Принято, спасибо!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
ruugie (2022-09-18 17:11:03+00:00): Can you still walk it?
Carto'Cité (2022-12-20 19:03:18+00:00): Bonjour Renaud,
Il faut laisser ce type d'aménagements en path :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009117302
Et ne pas les passer en cycleway car il n'y a aucun élément de signalétique qui permet de le qualifier de piste cyclable. highway=path est adapté dans ces situations.
N’hésite pas à me solliciter si tu as des questions.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Buraddo (2022-08-30 20:13:30+00:00): Hello Idim,
DJ=secondary is only a guideline and should be taken with a grain of salt. This road is a dirt path only accessible to off-road vehicles, thus it shouldn't be marked as a secondary road as it is not that important in the national road network. It shouldn't matter that the county administration is formally the owner of the road (there is some debate even regarding this as there is some bureaucratical problems that prevents the road modernization)
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
b-jazz (2022-10-15 16:42:37+00:00): Same deal here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903888461. The way crosses over itself and makes an invalid polygon.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
rarad74 (2022-08-29 06:50:04+00:00): Salut. Strazile in interiorul unei intreprinderi se pun ca si service road cu subcategoria driveway pentru zonele folosite ca acces catre cladiri si parking aisle in zonele de parcari. Nu le mai lasa ca service road simplu. O zi buna.
haukep (2022-08-29 07:07:28+00:00): Hallo Claudio,

danke für diese Änderung. Nun bin ich verunsichert: Als ich mit meinem Changeset 121520311 den Briefmarkenautomaten nebenan hinzugefügt hatte, schlug mir der iD-Editor "operator=Deutsche Post" (ohne "AG") vor. Ich hatte das "AG" daher auch von diesem Briefkasten gelöscht, als ich ihn an die richtige Stelle verschob.

Nun die Frage: Was ist "richtig"? Mit "AG" oder ohne? Oder gibt es sogar unterschiedliche Antworten für Briefkästen und für Briefmarkenautomaten?
Brummelwuff (2022-08-29 11:11:22+00:00): Hallo, 
wenn man nach dem wiki geht (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deutsche_Postdienstleister) ist brand=Deutsche Post und operator=Deutsche Post AG
Claudio Salvatore Fabrizzi (2022-08-29 15:52:10+00:00): Hallo haukep und Brummelwuff,
im Nachhinein hatte ich in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:operator gelesen:
"Die Rechtsform des Unternehmens kann weggelassen werden, da OSM ja kein Handelsregister ist. Für 'Acme Spielzeug GmbH' reicht also 'Acme Spielzeug' aus."
Auf die Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deutsche_Postdienstleister wäre ich nicht gekommen. Aber nach diesem Wiki-Artikel sollte (wohl als Sonderfall) operator=Deutsche Post AG richtig sein.
haukep (2022-08-31 19:25:19+00:00): Alles klar - danke euch! Das scheint dann ungünstig von iD vorgeschlagen zu werden. Ich habe einen Bug Report dafür aufgemacht: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/6988
便携式小朋友 (2022-08-29 07:22:41+00:00): 蓬莱区“瀛海路”除了天地图，没有在其他地方看到此叫法，根据网络上的通稿，此段线路为“滨海路”蓬莱段
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:03:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125506709
NieWnen (2022-08-30 11:21:38+00:00): Proszę nie nakładaj na siebie 2 dróg (track i cycleway i tertiary).
Czy tam na pewno jest droga rowerowa? Bo ortofotomapie tego nie widać.
AlbaireN (2025-01-12 17:12:55+00:00): T'es sûr qu'il est vraiment interdit aux vélos ce pont ?
Nzau (2025-01-12 19:31:08+00:00): Bien joué !
Tu as trouvé une de mes premières contributions et erreur d'access ^^
Si je me souviens bien, Géovélo préférais me faire passer par là, plutot que par la Rue de Québec :/
Nzau (2025-01-12 19:31:27+00:00): J'ai fait quelques modifs 
Merci pour ton message
AlbaireN (2025-01-13 21:49:58+00:00): Je m'en suis un peu douté quand j'ai vu la date du changeset ;)