piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2014-11-30 16:18:32+00:00): У железной дороги http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215931135/history лишний тег service=spur. Это полноценная промышленная железнодорожная ветка, а не короткий станционный путь. Этот тег удалён.

Непонятно, почему железнодорожная стрелка http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/531540699/history была сдвинута на 22 метра. Она поставлена по точным координатам, полученным с gps-навигатора. Все стрелки в Тюменской области, для которых стоит номер (ref), поставлены точно и двигать их под спутниковый снимок не нужно. Допустимо их подвинуть поперёк путей (не больше чем на 5 м), но не на 22 метра вдоль путей.
- Откачено.

Из-за сдвига переходов через пути (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1988393976/history) получилась тропинка с зигзагами.
- Откачено.
mavl (2014-11-30 16:23:26+00:00): Смотрю дальше. Плохо: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/57.08427/65.62398

Часть объектов сдвинута, часть - нет. Может откатить пакет целиком?
mavl (2014-11-30 17:40:02+00:00): Разобрались. С пакетом правок всё в порядке. Откатывать ничего не нужно. Данные в работе.
naoliv (2014-12-04 18:05:04+00:00): One more thing: you have changed a valid wikipedia key and included some unnecessary alternatives for the same article in Fernando de Noronha relation.
poschon (2014-12-04 18:17:39+00:00): You mean this? -> wikipedia:de Fernando de Noronha
naoliv (2014-12-04 18:20:23+00:00): You have changed "wikipedia = pt:Fernando de Noronha" (that is the primary langague) to "wikipedia:pt = Fernando de Noronha".
And yes, you have also included "wikipedia:de" and "wikipedia:ru" (since they point to the same article but in a different language, they are unneeded)
naoliv (2014-12-04 18:21:43+00:00): Can I fix this?
poschon (2014-12-04 21:20:19+00:00): you have right about pt:. The wikipedia links for other languages are important for the tourist like me.
I was used the wikipedia for traveling inside Brasil. It helps to enjoy the country ;-)
poschon (2014-12-04 21:21:28+00:00): On the page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia

You could read:
.....In these circumstances use the format wikipedia:lang=page title for the secondary languages......
naoliv (2014-12-04 23:49:50+00:00): It's only valid when the secondary language doesn't match/point to the same article :-)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_languages
"One example where it is appropriate to provide additional explicit links to articles in secondary languages is where the subject is included in ***an article on a broader subject*** in the secondary language"
Aalen1 (2016-11-15 22:20:19+00:00): Hallo 
Beim Place Suburb
Postleitzahl unter postal_code=86633 angeben.
unter addr:postcode=86633
erscheint sonst eine unvollständige Adresse.
Wenn man die unter JOSM anklickt stürzt das Programm ab!
Aalen1
Aleks-Berlin (2016-11-15 23:26:49+00:00): bitte mache einen JOSM bug daraus, damt JOSM gefixt werden kann. JOSM darf bei keinen Daten abstürzen!
Danke, Alex
Aalen1 (2016-11-16 19:20:11+00:00): Hallo Aleks-Berlin
Hab mal so ein Ticket erstellt- 
Ist mein erstes!
Bei mir in der Firma bin ich gewohnt mit solchen Fehlern zu leben, da es Jahre dauern kann bis da was geschieht!
Aalen1
Aleks-Berlin (2016-11-16 21:24:38+00:00): mein JOSM Fehler war nach einer Woche gefixt :-)
Danke, Alex
Nakaner (2015-04-12 14:32:26+00:00): Verwendest du eigentlich die JOSM-Objektvorlagen der OpenRailwayMap? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenRailwayMap/Tutorial#Einbindung_der_Vorlage_in_JOSM Ich habe in JOSM gerade die Ausgabe einer Overpass-Abfrage auf railway:signal:combined=ks in Sachsen offen und finde innerhalb von zwei Minuten zwei Tagginfehler von dir. Oder kennst du ein Signalbild Kp0? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3201852245/history
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-29 23:49:47+00:00): Dlaczego usuwasz adresy z budynków?
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-30 00:02:13+00:00): Wycofałem Twój zestaw zmian. Proszę wziąć udział w dyskusji na ten temat: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=467773#p467773
Dmytro O (2014-11-30 22:41:25+00:00): Your data is not lost. I did not destroy result of your work. I just moved data to one place, to relation.
Dmytro O (2014-11-30 22:42:00+00:00): But as I can see this approach does not work in Poland.
Dariu5 (2014-11-29 22:01:47+00:00): Pridėta iš apleistos krepšinio aikštelės padaryta parkingo aikštelė.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-30 17:58:16+00:00): Looking at the tags on it, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2648431769/history doesn't look right.  If it's "Open 2016" it shouldn't really be a tourism=zoo (since it isn't one yet).  Perhaps some sort of "construction" tag would be better?
ajfroggie (2014-11-29 19:46:04+00:00): Mistake on the description.  I used a GPS Trace of the new Route 100 Morrisville Bypass to add it to OSM.
user_6110846 (2017-10-22 16:59:59+00:00): Ранчо у Санчо це landuse =farmyard 
Стайня - building=stable
joost schouppe (2016-10-06 14:39:02+00:00): je hebt van deze way 315056435 aangeduid dat er een fietspad is, maar volgens mij klopt dat niet...
joost schouppe (2016-10-06 16:32:02+00:00): nevermind, ondertussen gecheckt op mapillary. in het noorderlijke deel misschien wel een soort van halfslachtige fietssuggestiestroken, alleszins geen fietspad (zie changeset/42687096)
escada (2016-10-07 08:24:41+00:00): Zou het kunnen dat die er al opstond, dat ik enkel de weg gesplitst heb voor de turn:lanes. Nu ja, het doet er ook niet toe, je hebt het gecorrigeerd
joost schouppe (2016-10-07 09:15:54+00:00): Ha, dat zal het zijn - jij hebt version 1, dus dacht ik dat het "jouw weg" was. Maar dat kon eigenlijk niet natuurlijk.
literan (2014-11-30 12:11:13+00:00): Отличная работа, отрисовали вдохновляюще!
LexIgnatov (2014-12-02 19:14:29+00:00): Спасибо, я старался :)
dforsi (2014-11-30 10:26:08+00:00): Hai collegato Via Garibaldi e Via Filzi ma non hai specificato di cosa si tratta per cui è una way inutilizzabile. Guarda le etichette di Via Filzi.
yvecai (2014-11-30 14:21:39+00:00): Hé, la vallée de Joux a une meilleure tête avec toute ses pistes de descente!
4rch (2014-12-01 09:49:38+00:00): This changeset damaged some administrative boundaries. Please do not edit objects you're not familiar with.
eggie (2017-06-25 19:07:37+00:00): PB gestuurd met opnieuw welkom
Monitor (2014-12-01 08:22:22+00:00): При редактировании чужих данных обращайте внимание на мультиполигоны.Этой правкой Вы сломали их штук десять. 
p.s. potlatch не лучший инструмент для работы с м/полигонами. 
p.p.s. вернул все назад
torbnn (2014-12-01 21:36:11+00:00): Не совсем понял какие мультиполигоны я затронул.Прорисовал дорожки.А номера домов зачем снесли?  Хорошо:Лесная 5,это штраф-стоянка.Отметьте пож-та,а я посмотрю,как надо.
emacsen (2014-11-29 23:49:49+00:00): You have been asked to make meaningful changeset comments by the DWG, in both Polish and English. Please explain this change in clear language.
eBin (2014-11-30 01:49:48+00:00): Usunięcie name:pl z ulic.
handofwarroad (2014-11-30 23:00:17+00:00): Why did you make Lake of the Woods into a park?
SeanMaday (2014-12-01 02:11:08+00:00): I have no idea. That was an accident. It may have been a bug in the iD editor. Good catch!
JeanneGreenlake (2014-11-30 08:58:49+00:00): missing imagery on eastern edge. screen just shows black.  I think this might be done.
cadsauxk (2014-12-08 14:29:37+00:00): Please provide reasons for these two deletion.
tkk (2014-12-08 14:56:11+00:00): There were duplicated info on both a single node and area. http://www.maproulette.org (Object tagged twice as node, way or relation)
cadsauxk (2014-12-08 19:49:18+00:00): thanks for clarifying.
fafawu (2014-11-30 09:05:12+00:00): 士林市場B1 免費置物櫃
globosound (2015-02-27 07:58:03+00:00): speedlimit korrigiert
~Jhellico (2014-11-30 11:35:19+00:00): Точки зміщено під невирівняний Bing
bernykov (2014-12-01 20:12:17+00:00): поясніть детальніше будь ласка
~Jhellico (2014-12-01 20:34:04+00:00): Відповів у PM
globosound (2015-02-27 07:57:45+00:00): speedlimit korrigiert
globosound (2015-02-27 07:57:26+00:00): speedlimit korrigiert
Jose Riha (2014-12-02 14:32:15+00:00): ad source... coze???? si robis snad kozy, vsak? to si necital, ze google maps, here.com a ine licencovanie mapy NESMIES pouzit pri vkladani dat do db?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright:
Prispievateľom OSM pripomíname, že by nikdy nemali pridávať dáta zo zdrojov chránených autorským právom (napr. Google Maps či tlačené mapy) bez výslovného súhlasu držiteľov práv.
sim6 (2015-09-26 21:33:30+00:00): From http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera "This node is tagged next to the way, where the actual speed camera is."

So, I'm going to map it correctly.
sim6 (2015-09-26 21:41:37+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34272586
sim6 (2015-09-26 21:46:01+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34272648
sim6 (2015-09-26 21:50:53+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34272696
sim6 (2015-09-26 21:53:37+00:00): Please, could you say if you are mapped in other changesets other speed cameras as a node of the way?
neiljp (2014-12-04 10:15:04+00:00): This is a big area for one edit; would you consider geographically smaller edits to make it clearer what's changed?
spark (2014-12-04 10:59:23+00:00): Yeah sorry my bad, I tend to get distracted and forget to upload between sections. Will try to remember!
neiljp (2014-12-04 12:24:27+00:00): No problem; I know what it's like :)
(I err on the side of micro-edits at times, instead!)
neiljp (2014-12-04 10:23:58+00:00): This is bing-traced; what lead you to select natural=grass? It's quite an uncommon tag. It's not listed on the natural page on the wiki. There has been debate about landuse=grass and landcover tags. I'd consider landuse=grass for now, if this is really just traced from bing?
spark (2014-12-04 11:12:07+00:00): Probably just me mixing up natural=grassland and landuse=grass in my head, have fixed now!
neiljp (2014-12-04 12:26:12+00:00): Cool; it renders now too, not that this is always a good reason! ;)
user_5359 (2014-11-30 13:02:34+00:00): Bitte nicht die Adresse als Name des Hauses eintragen.
robert (2014-11-30 12:48:13+00:00): Create an area and _tag_ it as "wood". All you've done here is create a bunch of lines that have the "name" "Trees".
robert (2014-11-30 14:37:06+00:00): There's a difference between actually tagging an area as allotments and just giving it the name "Allotments". In iD use the "search" box on the left to search for the allotments tag and then apply it by selecting it. Fixed this one for you.
SB79 (2014-11-30 13:57:46+00:00): Super, danke für die Überprüfung des Notes. :-)
marcoSt (2014-12-01 16:17:04+00:00): Bitte, gern geschehen. :-)
SomeoneElse (2023-10-28 13:17:33+00:00): I wonder if "operator=yes" is really the best tag for e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3212416963 here?
I'm guessing that "yes" is not the name of the operator, but just says that there is one.
kreuzschnabel (2018-01-15 07:58:24+00:00): In diesem CS hast du diversen Tracks den Namen „Rad+Wanderweg 10“ gegeben. Offensichtlich eine Wanderroute. Doch Wanderrouten werden als Relationen erfasst (und sind dann sehr viel besser technisch auswertbar, z.B. in der Waymarked-Trails-Karte oder in OsmAnd), nicht als Name. Könntest du das demnächst mal durchgehen und aufräumen?
mapper999 (2014-11-30 18:42:28+00:00): Im Bereich Stuttgart-Feuerbach fahren die S-Bahnen im sogenannten Halbregelabstand. siehe http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halbregelabstand
Das Halbregelabstandsankündigungssignal befindet sich hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/303469734
Nakaner (2014-11-30 18:48:32+00:00): Danke. Wieder was gelernt. Ich bin die Streck zwar vermutlich schon zig mal in meiner Kindheit und Jugend gefahren, aber das war jetzt (als Karlsruher) die erste Fahrt auf der Strecke, bei der ich Signal- bzw. ORM-aware war. :)
Der Halbregelabstand war vermutlich auch gestern notwendig, denn in Feuerbach war Gleis 4 gesperrt.
Grillo (2016-12-23 15:32:42+00:00): Heter restaurangen verkligen såhär? "Puta madre" är en svordom på många språk.
emacsen (2014-11-30 19:25:03+00:00): Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see this is one of your earliest edits, so I want to welcome you to the project.

This edit adding a phone number and website to the amenity is great. One small thing to make it even better is when you hit Save in your editor, if you could be sure to add in a useful changeset comment, such as in this case "Added phone number and website to Crispin's"
*Martin* (2014-12-02 15:03:02+00:00): Vzhladom na source toto bude treba revertnut ASAP. V mnohych podobnych changesetoch ti source chyba, takze predpokladam ze si tiez pouzil nepovolene zdroje :-(
dejineko (2014-11-30 16:19:40+00:00): アップロード時のコメントに「愛媛県内のセブン-イレブンの店舗を作成」と入力したのになぜか前の編集のものになってしまった。JOSMのバグなのかもしれません。
LidaCity (2014-12-26 16:27:40+00:00): несмотря на введённые новые данные - данный пакет правок отменяю, из-за сломанных дорог и сломаных кучи отношений
Geomapper69 (2015-01-22 10:30:42+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315178137
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
missing tag: Road? Path?
GerdP (2015-11-14 19:31:32+00:00): please review:
What was meant with surface=8 ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315181425
*Martin* (2014-12-01 10:00:09+00:00): Ahoj

Prosim nedavat do tagu name vseobecne nazvy, ale iba vlastne mena. T.j. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73766584 nema mat name="Obecny urad" a ma mat amenity=townhall.

Dakujem :-)
Jose Riha (2014-12-02 14:42:19+00:00): martin sa divim, ze Ti neudrelo do oci to "google maps, google street view, here.com"
*Martin* (2014-12-02 14:59:33+00:00): neudrelo, pretoze tu som source prehliadol
samely (2017-03-13 00:20:10+00:00): Hi JJGreen, thanks for contribuying to OSM, I was working around this area and I found many ways without any tag, and also they doesn't look to be based on the Bing imagery. Can you confirm that those exist?
Regards,
Eliane
JJGreen (2017-03-13 01:04:08+00:00): Hi, Eliane,
Check out the City's website it also shows these roads in the new development called Brighton.
http://apps2.saskatoon.ca/app/aRRCP/
cadsauxk (2014-12-08 19:38:26+00:00): Correções à esta edição em http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27341178
Nakaner (2014-12-01 20:19:27+00:00): Lieber S-D,

kannst du bitte mal erklären, was du in diesem Änderungssatz gemacht hast? Der User-Agent "reverter_plugin" widerspricht nämlich deiner Behauptung im Changeset-Kommentar, du hättest "keepright errors" korrigiert. Selbiges gilt auch für deine drei anderen bisherigen Changesets.

Warum hast du Änderungen von User atpl_pilot kommentarlos revertiert? Das ist erstens kein guter Stil und zweitens um Welten eher Vandalismus, als das was er getan hat! Verstanden?
Bitte leg offen, wer du bist und warum du was tust? 

Solltest weitermachen, werde ich deinen Fall an die Data Working Group der OpenStreetMap Foundation weitergeben.

Viele Grüße

Michael
bradyby (2014-11-30 21:00:04+00:00): ПАДЛА ЦО ТЫ РОБИШЬ
SomeoneElse (2014-12-03 23:59:42+00:00): You've edited http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1670988020/history , which was previously "name=Playground; "power=station".  Can you confirm that it really is an electricity substation and not a playground?  The imagery isn't clear, but it looks more like the former than the latter.
opani (2014-12-04 19:05:39+00:00): I was reviewing "power=station" objects in the area and came across this one. Since somebody had tagged is as power=station I assumed there had to be a substation here even if nothing is visible on Bing. Looking at the history I see that it was originally tagged as leisure=playground but then changed in the same changeset, could be an error by an inexperienced user with Potlatch. Should we change it back to leisure and delete the substation tag?
SomeoneElse (2014-12-04 19:09:47+00:00): In this particular case I'd add a map note rather than changing anything, since it's not really clear what was mapped in the first place.

Someone will either know the area or will be surveying locally and will be able to check.  It might even be me (I've done some footpaths just east of here).
opani (2014-12-04 19:16:40+00:00): I can't help with surveying as I live in the Netherlands.
SomeoneElse (2014-12-04 20:06:26+00:00): That's the main reason why I try not to edit things far from home :-)

Still, add a note and I'm sure that someone will be able to investigate.
frosm (2024-10-03 07:54:16+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315216098
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315216099
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315208358
Je ne comprend pas ce que tu as voulu renseigner :
- aucune trace d'un 2ieme point à côté du premier
- si c'est un sentier, c'est trop étroit aux voitures. si c'est restreint "privé" alors c'est plus large qu'un sentier
Sidneybechet (2024-10-03 08:15:57+00:00): Le groupe de modifications date d'il y a 10 ans... c'est peut être qu'il y a eu des travaux depuis !
frosm (2024-10-03 08:32:36+00:00): je ne comprend pas ce que l'age vient faire : il y a 10 ans, il n'était pas possible non plus de faire passer une voiture "privé" sur un sentier qui n'a pas la largeur pour cela.
de votre souvenir, laquelle des 2 infos serraient-elle la bonne ? la largeur ou la restriction voiture ?
Sidneybechet (2024-10-03 08:53:38+00:00): Les 3 éléments mentionnés sont inexistants. Le passage se fait sur la route. Une erreur ? En fait , il devait y avoir un chemin matérialisé d'une façon ou un autre, mais il y a eu récemment des travaux assez importants sur le barrage.
frosm (2024-10-03 09:12:26+00:00): Merci pour ton retour. j'ai supprimé les 3 éléments et j'ai adapté la relation itinéraire piéton pour refaire une boucle
SimonvdP (2014-12-01 02:53:16+00:00): bij de kruising met de Allemansveldweg staat G11
ijsb (2014-12-01 18:42:19+00:00): Bij de kruising met het Lappenpad G13.. Ik heb de tagging aangepast en mofa=no veranderd naar =unknown.
sim6 (2015-09-26 22:01:09+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34272788
like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27128966
hee243898 (2022-02-25 09:53:07+00:00): There's no post office here. Should it be edited to a nearby mail drop box or parcel pick up machine?
neiljp (2014-12-04 10:00:44+00:00): Hey Spark,
While it's good to see buildings on the map, these are very square, which is not always the case at the ends.
Also, lots of these buildings have extensions on, at least to some extent.
spark (2014-12-04 11:07:28+00:00): Hi, this was intended as an initial step, so that later on I can go survey the house numbers, split up the terraces and fill the addresses in. While the shapes may end up being a loose approximation, improving them without better aerial imagery would not be easy, and I think having a loose representation is better than nothing at all?
neiljp (2014-12-04 13:48:48+00:00): Shape: what I meant by square, is that the ends don't match the shapes at the end very well.
Alignment: while absolute alignment is awkward, the buildings look like they 'overhang' the middle service road, because while the shape is good generally, it's based on the roof, not the (slightly offset) ground plan, combined probably with an angular edge of the building.
Sorry, not meaning to go on about it, they're minor points really; I'm just wary of adding 'ok' data and then intending to go back later, as I don't always remember to myself :) Hence lots of notes from yours truly ;)
spark (2014-12-04 14:14:40+00:00): No, it's a fair point and good to get feedback! I distinctly remember being less than 100% happy with the alignment of everything, but also needing to stop messing around with OSM and go to bed...
I've gone back in and more accurately aligned the buildings and road with the imagery
neiljp (2014-12-04 14:27:29+00:00): No problem, it's good to see someone else so actively mapping when they get the chance :) Sorry not to get to meet you at the hackday.
glluch (2014-11-30 23:41:40+00:00): изменение Элексросеть на Электросеть
sirb (2014-12-03 18:51:04+00:00): weikert road , east of rt-235 to rt-45 is known as LAUREL ROAD.
rt-235 west is know as WEIKERT ROAD
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-24 13:37:16+00:00): Prośba o wcześniejsze rozdzielanie nitek. Poprawiłem dwa miejsca: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1191040869 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3475001713
maraf24 (2015-04-24 14:04:05+00:00): Uzasadnienie?
Teraz jest źle. Tam nie ma dwóch przejść z dwiema sygnalizacjami. Jest jedno z jedną sygnalizacją.
Podobnie z jezdniami - jest jedna, a nie dwie.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-24 14:10:17+00:00): Uzasadnienie? Nawigacja za późno poinformuje o konieczności skrętu. Proszę poszukać na wiki lub na forum - temat był miętoszony parokrotnie.
cadsauxk (2014-12-08 19:42:36+00:00): Trata-se de um condomínio dentro de um bairro? O nome então deveria ser somente "Condomínio Bosque da Lagoa"  e o bairro criado com um nó place=suburb com nome "Portal do Sol". O que você acha?
Bruno Braga (2014-12-14 09:01:58+00:00): Feito ;)
malenki (2014-12-06 12:44:11+00:00): Ich war so frei und habe die John-Schehr-Straße wiederhergestellt.
claytonvo (2020-01-17 17:12:08+00:00): Hello Iowa Kid,

My name is Clayton and I work on the OSM editing team for Lyft. While working in this area, I came across this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15375585#map=19/30.33508/-97.75416  that was tagged as destination: Loop 1 North. according to the OSM wiki: (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#County_Highways) under Texas state highways, loop roads should instead be classified with ref tags as they are considered highways. Therefore, the correct tag to use would be destination:ref:Loop 1 North.  Can you please revert your previous changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27145704#map=19/30.33508/-97.75416 to reflect this change it would be greatly appreciated. 

Thank You
Clayton!
jaakkoh (2014-12-01 15:39:18+00:00): Thanks for fixing some of my notes in the area. Re: Lululemon (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/278661) Yes, it's now in the space that Cosi used to be in. So (now at the computer) I deleted the node and put new information on the building outline (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205023948/history).
chattiewoman (2014-12-01 17:02:21+00:00): Bitte nächstes Mal nicht bereits vorhandene POIs hinzufügen. Der Tag für Öffnungszeiten ist "opening_hours", nicht "operator" ;-)
Habs für Detmold City korrigiert.
zstadler (2017-04-04 10:05:24+00:00): The "only_straight_on" restriction http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4069851
is missing a "from" and "to" ways.
zstadler (2021-07-11 16:58:05+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50645451
iWowik (2014-12-01 13:58:32+00:00): Знака, что лошадям нельзя, на мосту нет. Зачем вы выдумываете?
iWowik (2014-12-01 14:00:36+00:00): Кстати, брусчатка только в начале, на весь мост не хватило, а вы на весь поставили.
VadimS (2014-12-01 15:11:12+00:00): знака, что машинам нельзя там тоже нет, насколько помню :) согласен, поправлю. хотел как лучше.
literan (2014-12-01 15:53:18+00:00): машины физически не проедут - тумбы
Lyubchenko Denis (2014-12-02 13:57:04+00:00): Не совсем понял необходимость тега мост (bridge=yes) на 42-х километровом участке трассы может быть не правильно скопирован тег?
berndw (2014-12-01 17:45:36+00:00): Was soll das für eine Fläche sein?

Das Gebäude Hausnummer 15 ist korrekt getaggt, aber für die Garage ist addr:housename etwas overdressed
frosm (2024-11-07 12:15:44+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315262583
te souviens-tu de la zone ? tu avais renseigné une restriction véhicule privé sur un sentier de 0,8m de large.
de plus la zone a l'air d'avoir changé entre 2021 et 2023, si tu passes par là, n'hésites pas :)
sebastic (2014-12-20 20:01:08+00:00): boundary_type=state is inappropriate for Dutch provinces. I've removed the tag from the Dutch boundaries in changeset 27595897.

border_type=province may be appropriate for Dutch provinces, but admin_level=4 already indicates that.

The boudary_type tag should never be used, use border_type instead if you must tag additional distinctions between boundaries with the same admin_level.

For now there is no use for the border_type tag in the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
romeoko (2015-01-17 20:55:38+00:00): Schonseit vielen Jahren keine Verwaltung mehr auf dem Friedhof, Gebäude jetzt in reiner Wohnnutzung. Verwaltung sitzt in Berlin