piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MitjaJez (2021-10-03 14:29:07+00:00): okay, sorry for my offensive editing
> lines of trieste the same in order to group in the relationship
We have wiki page for this.
If you insist to have this relation, than please collect route_master relations (like are "Bus 39/", "Bus 42", "Bus 43", "Bus 44" relations without direction in name)

Bus lines in city may have just foward or backward - which use different part of round or where road splits, where we have 2-ways.
We need to have this separate so we can apply timetable on lines so we can than use routing in practical use - how and WHEN to come from A to B by bus.
BRs
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-03 14:48:59+00:00): so you intend to redo the lines completely with the to and from reversed, insert them in the master route and in turn insert them in an even bigger route master?
MitjaJez (2021-10-03 16:55:24+00:00): Yes. This is ongoing goal already for some time.
Bigger route master is not required by OSM rules, anyway this bigger route might be a "site" type. I wouldnt use it. We can always generate this list of Trieste Trasporti routes with https://overpass-turbo.eu/
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-03 17:42:58+00:00): in my opinion it is useful, since not many who use osm know the existence of ot. On the bus relations already present I would put the route master and create two new relations (foward and backward) in order not to edit the "Trieste" wiki tables. I compare the relationship that encloses the comparable lines to those of the Orovincial roads of the FVG that have IT: TS, IT: GO ...
If we want we can work together on this thing. You can possibly write to me on the messages or if it is more convenient for you by e-mail to carmeli.alessandro@yahoo.com, for any problem do not get any problems.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-03 17:47:21+00:00): this grouping might be useful. This type of "mega-relationship" is already in use in many cities: see for example the Milan trams https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/971048
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-03 18:20:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112044372
MitjaJez (2021-10-04 20:02:50+00:00): Continue by mail, please check SPAM.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
literan (2021-10-11 21:01:43+00:00): "нотариус" это не имя собственное, не надо, пожалуйста, все подряд помещать в поле name
gendy54 (2022-01-14 22:04:48+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de ne pas enlever des tags importants sur les brigades de gendarmerie. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Gendarmerie_nationale#Les_brigades

Donat
Tomasz Herud (2021-10-06 17:46:33+00:00): Dlaczego zmienił Pan przebieg szlaku? W terenie ten odcinek nie jest i nie był nigdy oznakowany.

pozdrawiam
Tomasz Herud
Gliwicka Rada Rowerowa
nipsufn (2021-10-06 18:34:36+00:00): Intencją jest utrzymanie ciągłości szlaku (#10 wg https://geoportal.gliwice.eu/gpt4/?profile=5524815).
O ile pamiętam, brakuje też oznakowania końca szlaku.
Jeśli jest to niezgodne z generalnymi zaleceniami (na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=bicycle nic nie rzuca się w oczy), zmianę można wycofać.
Tomasz Herud (2021-10-09 17:21:44+00:00): Doskonale rozumiem intencję, natomiast nawet na wskazanej przez Pana Geoportalu dodany do szlaku odcinek nie ma numeru 10, tylko nazywa się "Obwodnica". Dodatkowo numeracja w terenie nijak ma się do tej z Geoportalu, gdyż w terenie szlak ma nr 5.
Tak czy siak oznaczony przez Pana odcinek nigdy w terenie oznakowany nie był, bo powstał wiele lat po powstaniu szlaku.

PS. Jako Gliwicka Rada Rowerowa czyniliśmy starania, żeby miasto zaktualizowało oznakowanie tego szlaku w terenie, ale niestety nic takiego jak na razie się nie wydarzyło.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-20 02:22:13+00:00): footway aqui? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9138325449
umbraosmbr (2023-10-28 13:10:42+00:00): Bom dia!!

Corrigi para Caminho informal.
flother (2021-10-01 17:55:38+00:00): Hi,

I'm just wondering why you removed the highway=residential tag from Maríugata? If it's still under construction the tags should be highway=construction and construction=residential. If it's been removed or it's another type of road, then we should add some other tags to indicate what it is.
NieWnen (2021-10-01 17:14:14+00:00): source=https://grodziski.e-mapa.net/
deret (2021-10-01 17:40:11+00:00): Gute Arbeit, danke! :)
CjMalone (2021-10-01 23:06:07+00:00): Hello & welcome to OSM.

Just a quick heads up, we use international phone numbers, so it should be "+44 1244 374 046".

Also there are some issues with the address, I think I'd do the following in this case:
addr:housenumber=10
addr:housename=Sealand Road Industrial Estate
addr:street=Hartford Way
addr:postcode=CH1 4NT
addr:country=GB

Let me know if you need any help,

Cj
MFlamm (2021-10-02 16:25:27+00:00): Hello,
Ce groupe de modifications comporte plusieurs problèmes:
1) La ligne ajoutée (highway=cycleway) fait doublon avec le tag cycleway:right=lane qui se trouve sur la ligne de la rue elle-même. Et c'est cette dernière façon de cartographier qui est correcte ;-)
2) Le tag name=* ne doit être utilisé que pour associer à une ligne un nom propre (=nom de rue). En général, ce tag n'est pas approprié sur des lignes avec highway=cycleway.
3) Enfin, en sus de mon point (1), la ligne ajoutée est problématique car elle recouvre en grande partie une ligne existante (=celle de la rue elle-même).
MKnight (2021-10-02 08:45:02+00:00): Moin,
Du hast hier 2 Relationen gelöscht und durch inhaltlich gleiche neue ersetzt, warum?  
Beispiel: relation "nur rechts abbiegen" durch "nicht links abbiegen".
Ulli1955H (2021-10-02 20:42:30+00:00): Moin MKnight,
ich hatte die bestehende Restriktion nur rechts abbiegen nicht erkannt, mein Fehler.
Da ich mir mit der Richtigkeit der Änderung nicht sicher war hatte ich um die Kontrolle gebeten.
Nimmst du die Änderung zurück oder muss ich es machen?
Gruss Ulli
MKnight (2021-10-03 07:39:48+00:00): Moin, es ist zwar nicht direkt falsch, ich hab es trotzdem rückgängig gemacht
Filip009 (2022-01-28 21:14:10+00:00): Dobrý deň, tu sa Vám podarilo vytvoriť duplicitu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9712370
&
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13281721
laznik (2022-01-29 06:03:26+00:00): opravene. Dakujem za upozornenie
mariotomo (2021-10-01 22:53:12+00:00): :+1:
Frans S (2021-10-02 10:04:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111974592
aachso (2021-10-02 00:09:54+00:00): Hallo Balither und willkommen bei OSM!

In den Namen gehören nur tatsächliche Namen, keine Kategorisierungen oder Beschreibungen. Dass es sich um "Ackerland" oder eine "Ackerfläche" handelt, geht bereits landuse=farmland hervor, einen Namen brauchen diese Flächen nicht. Bitte entferne den Namen daher wieder.

Weitere Informationen über Namen findest du hier: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Names
eggie (2021-10-01 18:32:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..  Wat bedoel je met Beginn TET
Het zal zo niets doen in OSM.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-02 06:33:10+00:00): Onduidelijke vermelding voorlopig verwijderd.
MVG eggie
janolezab (2021-10-01 20:22:48+00:00): Nicht „Berliner Hochschule für Technik“?
mardiz (2021-10-01 20:41:13+00:00): Hast recht:
https://www.bht-berlin.de/name
janolezab (2021-10-01 21:14:02+00:00): Ich dachte ja mehr an name="Berliner Hochschule für Technik" und short_name=BHT. Im Impressum (https://www.bht-berlin.de/impressum) nennen sie sich einfach "Berliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT)". Der Slash in B/HT ist denke ich nur eine Designsache im Logo.
Allroads (2021-10-05 17:54:01+00:00): closing times  versus opening_hours
access:conditional=no @ (times)
opening_hours
We need to know the timetable, for good routing.



https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

access
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
wonderb0lt (2021-10-06 17:49:46+00:00): Thanks. I have reached out to the hotel I was staying at, let's see if they know some details!
wonderb0lt (2021-10-11 12:18:07+00:00): They have replied, but only with times for the nearby Passage (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130093522 et. cetera), I'll move the closure to a note until the correct closing time is determined
Allroads (2021-10-11 12:27:43+00:00): Someone in The Hague must look in to it. Could be changing times.
Jakka (2021-10-01 19:44:25+00:00): denk eraan we gebruiken de aiv vlaanderen grb laag om gebouwen te plaatsen. Luchtbeeld/foto verschillen van jaar tot jaar... recentste luchtbeelden om na te zien of grondplannen up to date zijn .... waar te vinden druk op b of via 5 menu rechts en dan onderaan
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111975609
AntMadeira (2021-10-02 17:17:17+00:00): Olá, Pedro.
Espero vir encontrar-te bem.

Vi que alteraste a localidade de Vendas Novas de city para town.
Recentemente, foi aprovada a padronização das localidades e dos limites administrativos no OSM Portugal pela comunidade.
Aconselho-te a leres a página onde tens toda a informação disponível:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Propostas/Localidades_e_limites_administrativos

Se tiveres alguma dúvida, crítica ou sugestão, podes fazê-lo aqui, na própria página de discussão dessa wiki ou nos canais da comunidade, no Telegram ou na mailing list.

Um pedido: quando fizeres edições, tenta ser o mais descritivo possível no campo do comentário, para que os outros mapeadores saibam mais facilmente o que foi feito.

Esta tua edição será revertida.

Ao dispor,
António Madeira.
Pedro Albacete (2021-10-02 18:31:39+00:00): Olá António
As mudanças que fiz nas localidades de Portugal servem a um propósito, compartilhado pela maioria da comunidade Openstreetmap na Espanha e em toda a Europa.
Existe uma desigualdade entre a utilização das etiquetas que concordou em Portugal e a que é acordada no resto da Europa. Em Portugal classifica as vilas muito pequenas (com alguns milhares de habitantes) como “cty”, enquanto no resto da Europa esta etiqueta é usada para grandes cidades e capitais de província, o que faz com que o mapa seja muito desigual entre Portugal e o resto da Europa (por exemplo, equiparar uma cidade de 3.000 habitantes, como Tarouca, a Paris, Tokyio, Londres ou Lisboa).
Eu vi que isso foi acordado por 13 editores, o que eu respeito, então você tem todo o direito de rotular os locais como decidiu.
No entanto, os editores da Openstreet na Espanha e em outros países consideram que esta decisão viola a uniformidade que se pretende com o mapa. Se cada país decidir por uma forma diferente de edição, o mapa será anulado de seu propósito original.
Uma saudação da Espanha.
AntMadeira (2021-10-02 19:15:48+00:00): Olá, Pedro.
Obrigado pelo teu retorno.

A proposta de padronização foi partilhada em todos os canais nacionais e internacionais e discutida ao longo de mais de 1 ano. Quero com isto dizer que não se trata de algo feito de qualquer maneira, nem com base em conceitos subjetivos.

Em Portugal, nenhuma vila está classificada como cidade. O conceito de cidade é decidido em conselho de ministros e a lei é editada em Diário de República. A lista é conhecida. [1]
Ou seja, ao contrário da classificação por população, que não é uma decisão subjetiva (qual o limite? 30 mil habitantes, 31 mil?) e não verificável (a população é um dado estatístico e mutável no tempo), a classificação em Portugal baseia-se em dados oficiais e confirmáveis, tal como o OpenStreetMap deve ser. Mapear para o rendering é uma violação de uma das regras base do OSM, mas cada comunidade tem o direito de determinar a sua padronização recorrendo às leis do seu país.
Além do mais, a wiki [2] sobre a etiqueta place=city não diz em lado nenhum como a etiqueta deve ser definida, deixando essa decisão a cada comunidade local, dando o exemplo de Inglaterra.
A hierarquia no rendering dos mapas deve ser feita não pela etiqueta place=*, mas pela etiqueta capital=*, e o role de admin_centre. A etiqueta population=* pode estar presente no ponto e ser usada para o rendering das localidades, mas uma cidade é uma cidade e uma vila é uma vila. A base de dados deve ser confiável, verificável e estruturada.

Por último, peço que, no futuro, sempre que fizeres uma edição em massa (83 pontos) em Portugal, contactes a comunidade primeiro. É um gesto de cordialidade que muito agradecemos.

Saludos de Portugal.

António Madeira.


[1] https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_de_cidades_em_Portugal
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity
Konkon153 (2021-10-01 18:31:40+00:00): [ und damit alle Adressen in der Gemeinde Leezen vollständig angepasst ]
Wilmer Osario (2021-10-19 11:04:13+00:00): Please do not remove the name of the ramps, called "distribuidores", because those are the official and colloquial names that are given to these types of roads in Venezuela. Their names are very important in road navigation in this country.
VigotheCarpathian (2021-10-19 17:17:42+00:00): See changeset: 112667609 for details.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-05 07:21:22+00:00): أخي الكريم مثل هذه الأماكن تحفظها في مفضلتك وداخل جهازك ولا يصح أن تضيفها للخريطة العامة
VLD174 (2021-10-06 18:44:38+00:00): مرحبا وشكرا جزيلاً لك على مساعدتك وملاحظاتك. لقد قمت بعمل التعديلات، يرجى إعلامي إذا كنت ترى حاجة لمزيد من التغييرات.
Glassman (2021-10-04 21:10:48+00:00): #TIP: Connect the road to the service road at WinCo will allow routes to use the parking lot service roads.

#TIP: access=private means that no one can use it except the owner. Is that what you intended?

Can you review your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111977640
Glassman (2021-10-04 21:07:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111977767
Glassman (2021-10-04 21:07:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111977798
Filip009 (2021-10-09 07:51:52+00:00): Čauko, škola sa upravuje podľa tohto obrázku https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Single_school_on_one_site
Čize budova je building=school a areál okolo školy treba nakresliť a pridať mu tagy amenity=school. A meno treba dať na ten areál.
Dodko (2021-10-19 17:11:39+00:00): Škola už existovala v bode https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/534434247 stačilo tu doplniť údaje web, mail, telefón.
Teraz ste urobili 2 školy a odstránili samotnú budovu, že je budovou.
trial (2022-03-25 17:34:31+00:00): Bonjour, c'est plutôt une description qu'un nom et aération prend un accent. Du coup je vous/te laisse modifier, dans un sens ou un autre.
Glassman (2021-10-04 21:07:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111978921
GUFSZ (2024-03-28 17:01:45+00:00): Wenn ich den Verlauf der Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7972172/history/119
richtig gelesen habe, stammt das Fixme "Einige Abschnitte waren im September 2021 vor Ort nicht ausgeschildert." von dir.
Ich beschäftige mich gerade in der Frankfurter gegend mit den Apfelweinrouten. Die Beschilderung fehlt in einer Art und Weise, sodass ich alles, was ich abgefahren bin, auf disused gesetzt habe.
Deswegen wollte ich fragen, wie viele Kilometer bist Du damals abgefahren und wie viele davon waren ausgeschildert?
nurdafur (2024-03-28 18:27:16+00:00): Hallo
Ich bin damals südöstlich von Gießen in einem Bogen Richtung Frankfurt geradelt. Nicht direkt einigen Abschnitten der Route entlang. Ich schätze mal, dass da etwa die Hälfte ausgeschildert war. Genau kann ich dir das nicht mehr sagen. Das istvdoch schon zu lange her.
mariotomo (2021-10-01 22:50:57+00:00): hola Kaart.  since you're at it, adding roads, maybe you will find the massive contribution in form of notes by erickdeoliveiraleal quite useful: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country-custom?c=Panama&query=open
in particular in Azuero there's quite a few.
please, regarding classification, we use "unclassified" for roads that connect settlements, and keep "residential" to roads internal to residential areas (be it mapped or not). please do use the communication channels to review your contributions with the local community.
Inigo_Maptoya (2021-10-04 16:20:33+00:00): Hello Mariotomo, 
Thank you so much for passing along this information! 


Hola Mariotomo,
¡Muchas gracias por compartir esta información!
mariotomo (2021-10-04 18:15:28+00:00): hola otra vez.  para que las ediciones sean más uniformes, miren que otro mapero latino está trazando estas rutas con etiqueta 'highway=path'. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112041646
sería demasiado útil si siguieran el ejemplo, así que localmente nos resultará más fácil reconocer y revisar esta información.
Inigo_Maptoya (2021-10-04 19:45:40+00:00): Hello!
Thank you for letting me know about this and I will be sure to correct the classifications of those roads as I come across them. 

¡Hola!
Gracias por informarme sobre esto y me aseguraré de corregir las clasificaciones de esos caminos a medida que los encuentre.
mariotomo (2021-10-04 19:49:45+00:00): just the ones you (your team) add (or added).  please as remote mapper try not too hard to interpret what can't be inferred from aerial photo (local function of unpaved unmaintained road).
Inigo_Maptoya (2021-10-05 13:28:13+00:00): Thank you for the information! 

¡Gracias por la información!
Frans S (2021-10-02 09:35:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Map more accurate. Square the buildings

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111979436
NieWnen (2021-10-02 11:29:30+00:00): Path w sumie może być, to dobra opcja, nawet lepsza niż footway w tym przypadku.

Usuwam jedynie foot=yes, bo jest zbędne, bo domyślnie na highway=path, foot i bicycle jest jako "yes".
Wilmer Osario (2021-10-19 11:03:34+00:00): Please do not remove the name of the ramps, called "distribuidores", because those are the official and colloquial names that are given to these types of roads in Venezuela. Their names are very important in road navigation in this country.
VigotheCarpathian (2021-10-19 17:17:36+00:00): See changeset: 112667609 for details.
smeòrach (2021-10-07 13:17:30+00:00): Great to see this being done! though please bear in mind that in this part of the highlands, a lot of it is bog (aka flow) specifically
conifermapper (2021-10-07 14:17:01+00:00): Yes, I know that a lot of it is bog.If I find any bogs Ill add them to the map and make them inner relations within the heath multipolygon
Frans S (2021-10-02 09:29:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the buildings you map
Map each building individually
Don't include the shadow of the building into the mapping

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111980252
Frans S (2021-10-02 09:27:31+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. 
Be more accurate please. some mappings are oversizes or includes the shadow.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111980332
Road–Runner (2024-06-18 22:54:13+00:00): Der Weg auf den Zwölfernieder würde ich auch als herkömmlichen Bergweg sehen ohne wirklich exponierten oder weglosen Stellen. Ich setze sie wieder auf T2 zurück.  Oder was hat dich dazu bewogen auf T3 umzustellen?
Road–Runner (2024-06-18 23:10:45+00:00): Auch den Weg über das Sennjoch in der Lizum habe ich auf T2 gestellt. Bei T3 herrscht vereinzelt wirklich Absturzgefahr oder Widrigkeiten wie Schrofen, oder schwer erkennbare Wege treten auf. Also generell würde ich dir empfehlen eine Stufe weniger schwierig bewerten, obwohl ich natürlich weiß, dass das nicht immer einfach ist. Aber man kann sich ja etwas bei anderen Tourenberichten einlesen https://www.sac-cas.ch/fileadmin/Ausbildung_und_Wissen/Tourenplanung/Alpinmerkbl%C3%A4tter/20230601_SAC-Wanderskala_D.pdf
Road–Runner (2024-06-18 22:35:29+00:00): Hallo. Gibt es einen Grund warum du hier den Schwierigkeitsgrad verändert hast? Hast du dich in der Literatur informiert bevor du die Änderungen vorgenommen hast? Die Serles stimmt mit dem jetzigen Attribut zB nicht.
Polarbear-repair (2021-10-02 21:30:43+00:00): Hi, 
auch wenn im neuen Logo eine schräge Linie ist, hat das mit dem Namen wenig zu tun. 
Siehe https://www.bht-berlin.de/logo
"Berliner Hochschule für Technik (BHT)", wobei das Acronym entfallen kann. Entsprechend den OSM-Richtlinien würde ich letzteres daher im short_name belassen. 
Auch habe ich den bisherigen Namen als old_name wieder eingefügt.
salvoconducto (2021-10-12 15:57:17+00:00): IMHO only multipolygons would represent the gardens correctly.
NickJOB (2021-10-12 18:19:13+00:00): Do you mean that the houses should be subtracted from the garden polygons?

Also, just to note, the gardens weren't created as part of this changeset, I was amending the residential land use areas underneath.
eggie (2021-10-02 07:45:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community