piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2021-11-12 10:24:20+00:00): Hello! a school area doesn't have a tag admin_level=1
iandees (2021-11-11 22:16:56+00:00): Thanks for adding buildings!!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113669280
marczoutendijk (2021-11-14 19:06:49+00:00): Hello Map47,

I have contacted you on your personal account page, regarding your lack of contact with other OSM users. Are you aware of the fact that everytime someone is commenting here (on your changeset), you should get an e-mail notification of that!
Do you ever check your mail for OSM messages?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
andrewwiseman (2021-11-11 21:25:13+00:00): Hi, please make sure to check if you have mapped something that already exists, there are a couple roads that already exist where you added new ones. Thanks!
TomCerts (2021-12-08 22:35:47+00:00): Olá Altamiro Augusto Muniz,

Percebi que você removeu o ref tag RJ-134 da Estrada União e Indústria próximo a Petrópolis entre https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109148756 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13045971, bem como um algumas seções da BR-495 em torno de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301026346. De acordo com este mapa do IBGE (https://portaldemapas.ibge.gov.br/portal.php#mapa207403), as marcas ref RJ-134 e BR-495 deveriam existir nessas estradas. Você poderia comentar por que removeu as tags ref ou fornecer um recurso que mostre que elas não são mais válidas?

Obrigado,
TomCerts
Altamiro Augusto Muniz (2021-12-11 16:52:17+00:00): Não consegui abrir o seu link do IBGE, mas as alterações que fiz estão corretas. 
A BR-134 se inicia em Pedro do Rio (Petrópolis) passa Por SJVRP e termina na BR-116 em Sobradinho (Teresópolis).
BR-495 liga Itaipava a Teresópolis.
Tem um mapa novo do DER que pode auxiliar: http://www.der.rj.gov.br/documentos/mapas/Mapa%20do%20Rio%20de%20Janeiro.pdf
Altamiro Augusto Muniz (2021-12-11 17:59:19+00:00): A RJ-134 possui cerca 54 km. Inicia com o nome de Estrada União e Indústria, recebe vários outros nomes em SJVRP (não verificados) e termina com o nome de Rodovia Rodovia Bianor Esteves.
Altamiro Augusto Muniz (2021-12-11 18:06:04+00:00): A RJ-134 possui cerca de 54 km. Inicia com o nome de Estrada União e Indústria (Petrópolis), passa a se chamar Estrada Silveira da Mota (Posse), depois recebe vários outros nomes em SJVRP (não verificados) e termina como Rodovia Bianor Esteves (Teresópolis).
TomCerts (2021-12-14 17:27:45+00:00): Olá Altamiro Augusto Muniz,
Obrigado por responder e vincular seu recurso! O mapa mostra que a RJ-134 não segue em Petrópolis, entendo porque você retirou a ref. Acho que “ref = RJ-134” também pode ser removido de (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964345024) e a relação para BR-495 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4002974 ) podem ser removidos das formas nesta área (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964350010, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301026347, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way / 10914805). Você concorda?
Obrigado novamente,
TomCerts
Altamiro Augusto Muniz (2021-12-14 21:07:10+00:00): Acho que agora removi todas as tag incorretas e atualizei a BR-495 que se inicia sobre o rio Quebra-Frascos em Teresópolis e termina em Itaipava.
TomCerts (2021-12-15 23:02:14+00:00): Olá Altamiro Augusto Muniz, obrigado por fazer essas edições. Recriei https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4002974 porque é preciso em alguns locais. Caso contrário, suas correções são ótimas!
Obrigado,
TomCerts
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-12 07:54:03+00:00): Hi. What was the problem with the previous tagging? It was perfectly acceptable according to the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dtyres BR, Andrea
ElliottPlack (2021-12-09 17:10:28+00:00): Djam, there are some issue with this edit and some others nearby. It looks like you've added multiple highways on top of each other and set just one of them to motorway. What was the intent here?

Thanks,
ElliottPlack
OSM Data Working Group
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
DaveF (2021-11-16 22:52:52+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass/natural=sand are not required for golf features. Landuse is for specific areas as indicated in the wiki page's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish a pitch's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct. Click the 'ignore' option.

I've flagged it as an error:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347
ZenPhil (2021-11-17 00:05:23+00:00): Hm thanks for drawing my attention to this.
Sosha1996 (2021-12-13 21:58:30+00:00): لطفا مکان‌های شخصی خود را در نقشه وارد نفرمایید.

ممنون.
ovruni (2021-11-11 22:16:39+00:00): Hola Alecx Adrian De la Cruz, gracias por contribuir a OSM. En este conjunto de cambios con el texto "corregir puntos", se han movido varios nodos  que fueron mapeados utilizando la imágenes de Esri aclarada, que es la imagen con mayor claridad que existe en OSM actualmente para la ciudad de Lima, motivo por el cual he restaurado la alineación. Para cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad 
Saludos
sladen (2021-12-03 07:28:28+00:00): This edit appears to have broken the road/road/rail tunnel layering...

(Wonder if anything else got broken?)
altairb (2021-11-12 08:00:26+00:00): oh its fred the shed acc to the chatgroup on youtube xD
flohoff (2021-11-17 11:25:30+00:00): Also der changeset kommentar sagt es ist zu schmal für waldfahrzeuge du taggst aber jede menge von path -> track - Was ja bedeutet das es kein Fußweg sondern ein 2 Spuriger Waldweg ist.

Eines von beiden ist falsch. Dein changeset kommentar oder die änderung selber.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113670878
WhereIsNorth (2021-11-16 00:33:22+00:00): Estimado El ArquiPachuca:
Gracias por sus contribuciones a OSM. Me di cuenta en la area de Pachuca de que ha añadido varias rutas de autobús como vías siendo highway=service. Por la política de OSM, la forma preferida de modelar las rutas de los autobuses es con las relaciones en las carreteras existentes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Adding_a_bus_route_to_OpenStreetMap). El único momento en que las rutas de autobús deben ser vías de servicio únicas es si los carriles de autobús están separados fisicamente de la carretera principal. Por lo que veo alrededor de Pachuca, las rutas de autobús se modelarían mejor como relaciones en las carreteras existentes. Déjame saber lo que piensas. 
Gracias, WhereIsNorth
El ArquiPachuca (2021-11-17 00:31:45+00:00): Hola WhereIsNorth, desconocía sobre el tema de como añadir las rutas de autobús a OSM, principalmente añadí las rutas como vias de servicio siguiendo el ejemplo de la Ruta troncal, y también para que se pueda apreciar en el mapa y sin modificar las vialidades que pasa. Agradezco que me hayas mencionado eso y como no, estaré modificando las que he puesto para seguir el método que me mencionas. Saludos!
El ArquiPachuca (2021-11-17 00:34:02+00:00): Si tienes algún ejemplo en alguna otra parte de la forma adecuada para mapear las rutas te lo agradecería mucho!
El ArquiPachuca (2021-11-17 00:35:06+00:00): Los mapas que utilizo como referencia para las rutas son los que tiene el sistema en su sitio web: http://p-tuzobus.hidalgo.gob.mx/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=230&Itemid=1639&lang=es
WhereIsNorth (2021-11-18 23:41:02+00:00): Hola El ArquiPachuca,
Le agradezco que haya aceptado actualizar el modelo de las rutas de autobús que agrego alrededor de Pachuca. Aquí esta la ruta de autobús en la ciudad de México https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5872326 que muestra cómo se puede modelar una ruta de autobús en una relación con las carreteras existentes. Hay otros modelos de rutas de autobús en la zona que también puedes investigar!
Si quieres, también puedes intentar preguntar en la lista de conversaciones por correo electrónico de Mexico OSM, a la que puede unirse a https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-mx. Otras personas podrían haver tenido experiencia en el mapeo de otras rutas de autobús en Mexico. 
Feliz mapeo,
WhereIsNorth
Stalker61 (2021-11-12 10:47:46+00:00): Добрый день.
Это что за чудеса?
blacklinkin (2021-11-12 11:49:33+00:00): здравствуйте, какие чудеса?
Stalker61 (2021-11-12 14:13:43+00:00): Нижеперечисленные. К примеру, это что? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001565475
Вы правила тегирования в OSM хоть раз прочитали?
Stalker61 (2021-11-12 14:16:33+00:00): А это?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001565479
Stalker61 (2021-11-12 14:18:42+00:00): У меня так руки чешутся reverter запустить. Пока жду вердикта DWG.
blacklinkin (2021-11-15 08:55:13+00:00): не нашел нужного пункта в виде тюрьмы или концлагеря для подачи. выбрал более подходящее на мой взгляд. мне кажется,что тот кто увидит исправит ошибку и лучше обозначить место для всех.
gurglypipe (2021-11-12 11:52:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for your recent edits in Galgate.

One minor suggestion: addr:village= is not a recognised tag — it’s not documented on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr), so consumers of OSM data won’t be looking for it.

I think the correct tagging for houses in Galgate is addr:city=Galgate, and no addr:village= tag. There’s no need to mention Lancaster at all.

Would you like to update the tagging here, or shall I? :) Ta
fruitbat5577 (2021-11-12 12:38:33+00:00): There are house numbers I will add in this area so I'll fix this problem in the next few days. JOSM offered the addr:village tag. I'm not sure if that is an error or if it arises as a result of other wrongly tagged data in the area.
gurglypipe (2021-11-12 12:56:47+00:00): Thanks!

I agree that JOSM is probably suggesting addr:village due to other tagging in the area: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cXr

Some of it may predate address tagging becoming a bit more formalised
vulasala (2021-11-12 03:59:52+00:00): Hi Delbs,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 1001568011 from unclassified to residential as the way is shorter to give unclassified.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113671615
Dodko (2021-12-11 16:39:59+00:00): shop=car_repair use 
service=tyres 
not service:vehicle:tyres=yes
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar_repair
ovruni (2021-11-11 22:42:27+00:00): Hola Sergio Tijero, gracias por contribuir a OSM. En este conjunto de cambios con el texto "Fixed some roads that were wrong positioned, sorry for my bad english.", se han movido varios nodos que fueron mapeados utilizando la imágenes de Esri aclarada, que es la imagen con mayor claridad que existe en OSM actualmente para la ciudad de Lima, motivo por el cual he restaurado la alineación. Para cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
Sergio Tijero (2021-11-11 22:58:08+00:00): Hola ovruni, los cambios que he realizado concuerdan con la percepción visual de las calles alrededor de mi barrio, en el mapa actual no aparece mi calle que en realidad es un pasaje ubicado entre jose quiñones y miguel grau, asi mismo he notado que las calles pasan por encima de viviendas cuando la pista esta ubicada a la derecha de estas.
ovruni (2021-11-11 23:10:51+00:00): Hola, con respecto al pasaje, ya he restaurado ese segmento. Con respecto a lo de que las calles pasan por encima de las viviendas es debido a la imagen Bing que viste. OSM tiene diferentes proveedores de imágenes las cuales pueden variar de alineación, incluso la misma imagen de una empresa puede variar en el tiempo con cada actualización. La imagen de Esri aclarada que he mencionado y que es con la que se encuentra alineada la mayor parte de la ciudad de Lima, la puedes encontrar en la configuración de la capa de fondo https://learnosm.org/es/beginner/id-editor/#configuraci%C3%B3n-de-la-capa-de-fondo 
Como mencioné antes, para cualquier consulta tenemos algunos medios como el canal de telegram de la comunidad https://t.me/osmpe , donde puedes hacer preguntas sobre el mapeo que realizamos en Perú.
Saludos
vulasala (2021-11-12 05:52:03+00:00): Hi ggarcia417,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 1001570437 from unclassified to residential, as there is classification gap.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113671969
JuanjoMC (2021-11-12 09:41:44+00:00): Hi again,

here you deleted the Fietsen Van Campenhout node and moved (part) of the shop info to the building. In passing we lost most of the shop info (opening hours, website, email, ...). I restored the node.

As far as I remember, the shop is on the ground floor, it does not occupy the entire building. In that case use a node for tagging amenities, putting the tags on the building only makes sense if it is enterely dedicated to that activity as in the case of, ie, supermarkets.

Cheers
Tom Ameye (2021-11-12 14:42:08+00:00): Thanks for the correction. I overlooked the fact that there was information on opening hours etc. Certainly not my intention to delete that information.
Sergio Tijero (2021-11-11 23:09:38+00:00): El pasaje se extiende hasta la calle jose quiñones
ovruni (2021-11-11 23:40:06+00:00): Si, aquí he ampliado ese pasaje, se puede ver la vía completa en este enlace https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438008941
itineris (2022-01-02 14:52:32+00:00): Szia!

Véletlenül törölted útdíjas szakaszok végpontjait. Kérlek, legközelebb jobban figyelj oda!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-16 16:34:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339006330/history

Note that you added 
operator:wikidata=Q7058492
to object with
not:operator:wikidata=Q7058492

Is it intentional? Which one is correct?

Another mapper using my https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/ reported that "Northern Ireland Electricity and NIE Networks are the same according to wikidata. Doesn’t mean it’s true, I’m just pointing out that I cannot solve it by just looking at the wikidata entry."

Not sure is fixing this requires Wikidata improvements or is it some simple OSM mistake
VictorIE (2022-12-16 17:36:22+00:00): That wasn't intentional. Unfortunately with the debugger in iD the link for "Upgrade the tags" is next to "Tag as not the same "NIE Networks"". :( :)

Northern Ireland Electricity is the parent company of NIE Networks, However, there is effectively no difference, as it seems to be the only subsidiary of any worth. In turn, Northern Ireland Electricity is owned by ESB Group, the main power company in the Republic.

This is in contrast to other operators in the UK and Ireland, where the distribution network operators also generate and sell electricity. 

The transmission network (>50,000 volts) operators EirGrid and National Grid do not generate or sell electricity.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-11 23:29:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113662343, 113663406, 113665021, 113665870.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-11 23:32:03+00:00): Sorry about the large bounding box here - it made sense to revert all of these contributions in one go.  It is just Italy and Nauru.
abrensch (2021-11-21 10:40:43+00:00): Hallo Bridgeburner,

diese TR hier sieht wie ein Unfall aus:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3337069

Die hast Du von only-straight in lo-left geändert. Schaust Du mal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
JuanjoMC (2021-11-12 09:08:55+00:00): Hi,

some remarks about this changeset:

- do not delete buildings unless they are obviuosly wrong, but even then, ti's still better to redraw them, that way the history is preserved.

- do not draw buildings from aerial imagery, most of the time they are shifted (look for this building, 56-58 Koningslosteenweg, on AIV  2013-2015 aerial imagery and the most recent one to have an idea of what I mean). There is a layer named AIV Flanders GRB, please use it (and nothing else) to draw building footprints.

- there were two buildings here, I putted them back and copied the heritage stuff to both.

Cheers
Tom Ameye (2021-11-12 14:39:48+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out and correcting.
Hungerburg (2021-11-13 01:21:06+00:00): Hallo Frederic! Ein paar Stücke nördlich am Inn in Mühlau hast du übersehen. Das ist nicht gerade eine beliebte Promenade, von daher geht das, mir wenigstens, als Radweg durch. Von 2009 bis 2019 war das sogar so wie jetzt wieder. Was die 'community' angeht - nicht selten würde ich meinen, spielen in solchen Fällen oft Editor Presets die Hauptrolle, und die sollen nicht zu Hin- und Her Taggen führen, das wäre schade um die Zeit. iD (der Editor im Web) ist stark amerikanisch geprägt. Die verstehen unter Radweg etwas ganz andres als wir, da gebe ich dir recht.

Auf der Mühlauer Brücke den könnte man schon abtrennen von der Straße, dadurch ließe sich besser hervorheben, dass Radler sich den mit Langsamverkehr teilen. Durch die blauen Schilder ist es kein Gehsteig mehr, denn dann wäre das Radfahren ja verboten und nicht möglich, es zu erlauben. Andererseits kann es vielleicht auch so bleiben, weil Rennradfahrer beim Training sind an dieses Gebot ja nicht gebunden und weichen dann eben auf Sicht auf die Fahrbahn aus :)
snoozingnewt (2021-11-12 00:13:44+00:00): Hi, can you please use more constructive changeset comments? I'm also not sure why you deleted that bus stop, so can you explain that as well? Thanks!
spinogriz (2021-11-12 10:23:53+00:00): Now Street on reconstruction and possible bus stop will be moved to another place. 
For now, it's not relevant. I will add it after the street will be available for people 

Thanks for you comment
SomeoneElse (2021-11-12 10:35:42+00:00): Thanks
okadatsuneo (2021-11-12 00:59:00+00:00): ○○x丁目の○○の地名が行政領域リレーションのラベルとして登録されているので、それらはhamletのまま残しています。
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-18 07:47:16+00:00): الحاجز الذي قمت بإضافته غير صحيح نرجوا منكم التأكد قبل الرفع لأي بيانات
booktiger (2021-11-14 02:26:08+00:00): 请严格按照统计区划代码添加村庄。参见http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2020/11/01/06/110106100.html
不在统计区划代码的村庄应划为自然村(小村庄)，使用place=hamlet标签。
DaveF (2021-11-13 22:34:38+00:00): Hi
Did you mean to tag this as rough?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13431264
Mashin (2021-11-13 23:53:47+00:00): I think I just assumed, because this little area was tagged as fairway.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13431265
mueschel (2021-11-13 11:04:27+00:00): Hi,
is there a documentation of these new 'routing' tags? Right now I don't see any additional information that couldn't be extracted from common highway=motorway_junction or turn:lanes tags.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-11-13 18:20:14+00:00): We are trying to map the beginning and end of merging lanes, so it would be easier for autonomous vehicles to determine the lenght of the merging area. However, we did not find any tags for this in the official WIKI. Do you have any suggestion on how we should tag these?
mueschel (2021-11-13 18:28:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-11-14 16:42:38+00:00): I added a proposal about this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/turn:lanes:extension
mueschel (2021-11-14 18:01:12+00:00): You don't need a new proposal for this either - the tags to map this in detail already exist:
width:lanes:start and width:lanes:end
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-11-15 01:26:36+00:00): That is not the same as what I am proposing. We cannot measure the width of every lane in the region, but we need the start and end of the dashed line section.
mueschel (2021-11-15 09:02:49+00:00): If you don't want to add the actual width, you don't need to measure anything:
E.g. 
width:lanes:start = ||0 
says that the lane begins at zero width and (implicitly) ends at regular lane width.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-11-16 13:54:13+00:00): OK, thanks, I canceled the proposal.
mueschel (2021-11-24 14:11:48+00:00): One further comment: If you combine start/end with forward/backward, then the common order is

width:lanes:backward:end

I just changed a couple of these.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-11-24 16:36:07+00:00): OK, thanks! Where can we find this in the wiki? How do we know that forward/backward should be before start/end?
mueschel (2021-11-24 17:16:01+00:00): This was part of the proposal for start/end:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Suffix_start_and_end

But in general, we're missing a global definition for Suffixes - that's why I wrote
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/OrderOfKeyParts
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-11-24 17:26:20+00:00): Great, your wiki page is perfect, clean and simple with good examples. Thanks!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-25 05:40:53+00:00): Why the new tags?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-04-25 10:58:30+00:00): Can you be more specific? Which new tags? Thanks!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-25 15:26:11+00:00): routing:merge_left
routing:backward:separate_left
routing:forward:merge_right
routing:separate_right
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-04-25 15:47:38+00:00): These are old data, I will update with width:lanes tags. Thanks!
Sérgio R Loureiro (2022-01-20 17:21:13+00:00): Hoje fui lá e encontrei a Estrada dos Cucos com os obras ainda não prontas, mas já pavimentada.
Falei com um vizinho hoje e ele disse-me que o projecto original era para terem construído uma estrada onde está isto a cor-de-laranja em https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/38.79605/-9.15307
mas que havia lá gasodutos e como não sabiam a que profundidade estavam, decidiram não fazer.
FasterTracker (2022-01-25 20:09:25+00:00): Obrigado pelo feedback!

Sendo assim, mantém-se a etiqueta highway=construction até que haja mais informação.

Bom mapeamento, FT.
iandees (2021-11-12 04:05:03+00:00): Also note that you deleted some information like exit/destination sign information here. If you don't mind adding that back, that'd be helpful.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113675976
Mink (2021-11-12 04:28:18+00:00): Thanks,

I'm not quite finished with the area or the interchange. I will be adding the exit nodes when everything is said and done.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113675976
Heinz_V (2022-01-11 08:16:16+00:00): You made correction to NH24: 
each NH is part of a relation; you should update these relations.
VLD228 (2022-01-11 14:45:55+00:00): Hi  Heinz_V,

Thank you for looking into this, I have made necessary changes and restored the relations
iandees (2021-11-12 04:03:31+00:00): Please try to improve the existing roads instead of deleting and re-mapping them. This is important because you're removing the history of the existing roads, but you might also be breaking data (like highway relations or bus routes) that rely on those existing roads.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113676288