piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
streckenkundler (2021-04-16 13:55:54+00:00): Hei,

Ja, JOSM ist ein mächtiger Editor und es braucht Einarbeitungszeit. Das lohnt sich aber... Nur zu! :) Die Nutzung der LGB-Luftbilder kann ich dir aber nur wärmstens ans Herz legen. Bing hat einen üblen Versatz. Alternativ gehen auch Esri-Luftbilder (nicht clarity beta!) Diese sind gleich zu denen des LGB

Sven
Dawid2849 (2021-04-16 10:25:25+00:00): source=survey
chlenix (2021-05-20 19:28:59+00:00): ну и что это?
Юрий Бородуля (2021-05-21 07:45:53+00:00): Подскажи что не так?
VARVAR8 (2021-05-21 08:01:11+00:00): Навіщо було робити комерційну зону замість житлової на півселища?
chlenix (2021-05-21 12:10:07+00:00): VARVAR8, це місто))
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:20:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
user_5359 (2021-04-16 14:21:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please mixcased characters for the names.
Arthur2e5 (2021-04-17 16:59:40+00:00): I am pretty sure the boundary=disputed tag is not documented anywhere, and it would be odd to suddenly make it a thing. The way forward should be first tagging it with something that gets rendered (b=administrative) plus some sort of disputed tag, and then going back on the wiki to workshop a way to describe this info.
woodpeck (2021-04-17 17:08:36+00:00): Why would you tag something as an administrative boundary that clearly isn't?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-19 22:02:13+00:00): Proszę, opisuj swoje edycje. Zobacz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
ivanbranco (2021-12-30 08:43:03+00:00): Hi osm_saint-louis,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8635003051/

the tag for peaks is natural=peak, not place=peak
osm_saint-louis (2022-01-02 14:05:41+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,
Thank you for informing me about the small mistake I obviously made. However, it would be more helpful if you would simply correct such obvious mistakes yourself, because as a highly experienced cartographer I do not need such instructions ;-) I wish you continued fun with your mapping and a Happy New Year 2022!
Kind regards: uli.l
ivanbranco (2022-01-02 14:19:17+00:00): If I edit without commenting it's possible a user will keep making the same mistake over the time. Also, you changed it from place=peak to place=hamlet, so I would have made a mistake changing it to natural=peak without asking you. That's why a prefer asking to the changeset's author when I have doubts since they have better knowledge than me about what they mapped.

Happy new year.
FraukeLeo (2021-04-18 11:13:50+00:00): hi aselnigu, nach deiner Bearbeitung haben sich hier inner und outer des MP überschnitten, deshalb wurde der Wald nicht mehr dargestellt. Ich habs gefixt.
aselnigu (2021-04-18 11:29:00+00:00): Vielen Dank.
flohoff (2021-04-19 08:41:49+00:00): Moin,
das hier gehört nicht in den "Name" - Name ist wirklich für Eigennamen und nicht für beschreibendes. Beschreibendes gehört nach "description".

"3. Verschwenderische Blütenpracht und süßer Genuss - Blick nach Rheda-Wiedenbrück"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103053479
nochwirrererbuchstabensalat (2021-04-19 14:03:06+00:00): Alles klar!
gmar5 (2021-04-16 11:06:22+00:00): Eastwyke (Typo in the changeset description only)
JessAk71 (2021-04-22 20:27:27+00:00): Hello, it looks like when you are merging point tags to buildings you are not removing the point feature and are leaving behind empty points, please delete the points once you have transferred the tags otherwise you are leaving empty nodes with no information... I can see this has occurred in a large number of your changesets
JessAk71 (2021-04-22 20:28:52+00:00): I have fixed this case here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103436314 but many more exist...
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-23 04:14:10+00:00): Sorry for that, will keep that in mind.
Sam505 (2023-10-12 05:22:20+00:00): Giant change to HARI-HARI SWALAYAN
Francesco Zanaboni (2021-04-16 11:20:35+00:00): Chiedo scusa per il changeset "ingombrante", ho aggiunto un nodo a una linea facente parte del multipoligono del Parco del Fiume Tormo.
tastrax (2021-05-07 08:02:20+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
ivanbranco (2021-06-28 16:31:05+00:00): Ciao Damiano,

questa relazione ha un problema. Hai creato delle linee sovrapposte alle strade. Dovresti invece aggiungere le strade già esistenti alla relazione.
Lejun (2021-04-17 07:04:48+00:00): Merci et bienvenue dans la secte de la micro cartographie !
Pour désigner différentes structures il existe des étiquettes précises utiliser, pour les aires de jeu vous les retrouverez ici :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:playground
Plus généralement, on évite d’utiliser « name » qui sert lorsqu’il y a un panneau avec un nom officiel. Pour un commentaire il est préférable d’utiliser « description » ou « note »
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-04-19 03:36:38+00:00): Физкультпривет.
То, что ты водохранилищами (water=reservoir) обозначаешь, это пруды в лучшем случае (water=pond).
s0mik (2021-04-20 06:13:40+00:00): Если это ручей, перегороженный дамбой, прудом не совсем верно называть!
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-04-20 06:22:28+00:00): Ну ёмаё, это же лужи, воды по колено. Как у тебя язык поворачивается их водохранилищами называть. Да и дамба слишком громкое название для этих запруд.
Хочешь на форум или в Телегу напиши, пусть рассудят.
eggie (2021-04-16 12:18:26+00:00): Dag Koen Begin nooit met access=no  Dat geeft allemaal routeringsproblemen.
Wat voegt access=no hier toe?
Warom op een highway=unclassifie .. cycleway=track????
Dat wil zeggen dat er aan weerszijde een fietspad loopt Is dat hier het geval?
Kijk nog eens goed naar je edits en wat de consequesties zijn. 
Welk bord staat er vooraan?

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103057470

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 12:35:21+00:00): Dit is door mijzelf ooit als fietspad getagd  en het is echt geen hoofdrijbaan met aan beide kanten een fietspad hier. Wel is een deel bestemmingsverkeer. 
access=no Betekent Verboden Toegang en niemand mag op jouw weg komen...  Dit lijkt me sterk.
In een grijs verleden was het ooit een unclassified, maar later werd dit een fietspad. 
Ik heb wat aangepast. 
access no verwijderd.. unclassified omgezet naar cycleway   cycleway=track verwijderd
Tja en hoeverre het motor_vehicle=destination is   Up to you. 
Moet nog veel gebeuren hier. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 12:37:20+00:00): Tip Al die binnenstraten kun je omzetten naar highway=residential..
siberiano (2021-07-05 18:21:32+00:00): Извините, но полигон landuse=residential так не используется. Вы его нарисовали, я так понимаю, чтобы Татарск подсвечивался на отдалении, но так делать не надо.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

в вики написано:
> The extent of the area should mark the boundary of known residential use, not the extent of the whole town or village.
eggie (2021-04-16 12:53:51+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode
Pikse (2021-07-07 17:10:36+00:00): This type=network relation seems useless without different member roles and/or additonal tags. If you just need to gather some related relation, then this can be queried fairly easily:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19e4

See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories
eggie (2021-04-16 12:50:47+00:00): Beste Rob   Hier ston altijd een verkeersbord Verboden voor (brom)fietsers en voetgangers.
Sinds wanneer mag je hier fietsen?
MVG
eggie
E de Wit (2021-04-18 10:37:18+00:00): Na controle zie ik dat Rob gedeeltelijk gelijk heeft. Het C15 verbodsbord is alleen aanwezig wanneer men Workum verlaat.

Ik heb de situatie aangepast conform de obliek beelden van eind 2020 in changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103131416

-E de Wit
eggie (2021-04-18 10:39:49+00:00): Ahhh.... Top

Groet
Eggie
E de Wit (2021-04-16 12:32:22+00:00): Is het verbodsbord voor de Suderséleane weggehaald?

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=Ahzbfl04ZRzl8iItbnnmRq&lat=52.9734433908&lng=5.434864265833333&z=17&x=0.6135979286307656&y=0.46463918717005603&zoom=0.6939090208172706
eggie (2021-04-16 12:51:44+00:00): Zie ook mijn opmerking hier.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103059255
eggie (2021-04-16 13:00:34+00:00): PB gestuurd met verzoek te reageren op opmerkingen.
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-16 17:01:39+00:00): reviewed - good!
dieterdreist-CAI (2024-01-13 14:41:03+00:00): Ciao,
ho notato che hai cancellato un edificio sulla Marconi in questo changeset, e ancora in OSM si trova un buco:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419858708/history

Ora lo rimetto. 

Ciao,
Martin
Kovoschiz (2021-04-16 14:17:52+00:00): You shouldn't add `building=yes` to the `type=building`.
ainki (2021-04-16 13:21:53+00:00): Hei!
Liikennejärjestelyt ovat muuttuneet Koivusaaren metroaseman ympäristössä sitten tuon vuoden 2017 ilmakuvan jälkeen (tarkista esimerkiksi Maxar tai kaupungin ilmakuva), ja muutit tiet takaisin kuten ne olivat vuonna 2017.
Palautan tämän changesetin aikasempaan.
sutsisatsi (2021-04-16 13:24:43+00:00): Aijaa, olin katsovinani nykytilanteen ilmakuvista ja Mapillarysta ja poljin tuosta myös pari viikkoa sitten. Millä tavalla tilanne on siis erilainen?
sutsisatsi (2021-04-16 13:25:29+00:00): Ilmakuvilla tarkoitan siis kaupungin karttapalvelun ortoilmakuvaa.
sutsisatsi (2021-04-16 13:29:10+00:00): Nyt tajusinkin, tosiaan tuohon on tehty pieniä maantäyttöjä. Korjaan väylät kulkemaan oikeassa linjassa.
ainki (2021-04-16 13:42:45+00:00): Moi! Voin yhdistää vanhan ja uuden changesetin puolestasi. Ei tarvitse alkaa itse säätämään :)
Adamant1 (2021-06-07 06:08:57+00:00): Hi. I'm wondering why you changed this to a single carriageway when there's traffic islands all the way up and down the middle of the road. I'd appreciate it if you changed you reverted your edit to make it a dual carriageway again. 

Thanks
andreig_telenav (2021-06-07 07:53:38+00:00): Hello, thanks for reaching out to me! I apologize for this situation. The reason I made the following changes was because of the bidirectional lane that exists between the traffic islands. I will change it back to dual carriageway where there are traffic island, and leave it as single carriage way where the bidirectional sign is marked on the road.
I hope that it is ok this way.
Adamant1 (2021-06-07 08:06:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the response. No problem. That whole area is rather convoluted. Really, most of Redding's road network is. So, whatever you think is the best way to do it. My main thing is making  sure that the existence of the traffic islands is preserved. I had thought about just mapping them as nodes along the single carriage way, but that does not seem correct for some reason. Anyway, your solution is fine.
portalaventura (2021-04-16 12:42:40+00:00): Boas-vindas Polska Cell Informática, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
bxl-forever (2021-04-17 18:36:05+00:00): Hello,
The cycle track was already properly tagged as an attribute of the main way (see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318930654).
Sometimes it makes sense to draw a cycle track as a separate way but it must be one or the other, not both.
Also, your edit creates several validation issues: your path crosses other ways without any proper node at the junction, and you moved the border between Brussels and Flanders without any reason.
Can I please ask to to either undo your changes or fix them?
Many thanks.
endautrestermes (2021-04-17 21:30:08+00:00): Hi ! Thanks for the info on the attribute to the main road, although I don't think this is the most user friendly for the cycling user (who can't see it on the map). I'll try to fix the issues, although that was the reason why I requested a review, as I believed some one could fix them as I am quite new, but I will try to find out how.

Maybe you can direct me to the relevant ressource?

Have a good w-e !
bxl-forever (2021-04-18 13:47:44+00:00): If your requirement is to see cycle infrastructure on the map, you can use the "Layers" button and use CyclOSM or Cycle Map (alternatively, go to https://opencyclemap.org to have it straight on).
bxl-forever (2021-05-01 12:37:15+00:00): I kept your idea of drawing the cycle track as a separate way.  I had to redraw it to match the real outline and connect proper connectors across the intersections.
The map tiles have probably updated by now, you can see how it looks.
endautrestermes (2021-05-02 13:40:53+00:00): thanks !
impiaaa (2021-05-10 17:54:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset 104467927
jleedev (2021-04-16 15:40:55+00:00): "SR" is correct.
kylebakerpa05 (2021-04-16 16:05:52+00:00): alright thank you, you already told me. the road is considered OH but I will keep the SR on the routes for now on.
clay_c (2021-04-16 17:18:09+00:00): No big deal. Each state has its own conventions for how it signs roads. ODOT is pretty consistent in signing them as "State Road" and mappers in Ohio have come to the consensus that refs should match signage. Likewise in Indiana.
user_8521440 (2021-04-16 15:18:03+00:00): Thanks for the clarification, this has been quite the tricky junction to map properly.
Seajays (2021-04-16 16:00:15+00:00): No problem - I think the main guidance for the junction is not to start the off road until it actually splits. The deceleration lane is kept as a third lane on the road prior to the split. This is to help with lane guidance on satnavs.  More info is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_assist/Examples/Motorway_Deceleration_Lane_at_Exit
limes11 (2021-04-16 17:09:42+00:00): Du hast das vor 2 Monaten schon einmal gemacht, bitte stell das ein. Das Siebengebirge ist bereits als Naturschutzgebiet erfasst, hier geht es nur um den Landuse. Das ist so alles korrekt. Ich hatte das auch im anderen Changeset entsprechend kommentiert

Habe es wieder geaendert.
jleedev (2021-04-16 15:59:13+00:00): "SR" is correct.
kylebakerpa05 (2021-04-16 16:04:40+00:00): alright thank you for letting me know
jleedev (2021-04-16 15:37:14+00:00): "SR" is correct.
kylebakerpa05 (2021-04-16 16:06:05+00:00): already told me.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-04-16 13:50:07+00:00): I would be curious to see a from-the-ground picture of this unmarked highway crossing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103063239
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-19 07:16:33+00:00): Bonjour, 
Une petite description du point de vue serait la bienvenue !
#CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103063344
Lee Carré (2022-01-15 22:13:48+00:00): See, also, discussion of http://www.osm.org/changeset/87465073
Vinber-Pro (2021-04-16 16:58:35+00:00): Bonjour,
pour les url, n'oubliez pas http:// ou https://. 
Bonne carto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103063715
Vinber-Pro (2021-04-16 17:01:19+00:00): Et quelle impolitesse, je ne vous ai pas souhaité la bienvenue ! Direct sur des suggestions d'améliorations !
Bienvenue donc : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103063715
Facalderonm (2021-04-18 02:35:24+00:00): Can we discuss the reason for your changes? They are contrary to the local guide on "how to map": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia#Transporte_masivo_en_bus
colgza (2021-04-18 14:07:29+00:00): Well, I did something *incredibly* idiotic, and I did it over and over again.

I wanted to unilaterally make `highway=busway` a de facto tag, without contacting local tagging groups, *without it even being translated into Spanish.*

Today, I will be unilaterally trying to undo the changes I made.
colgza (2021-04-18 14:08:13+00:00): Additional conversation is in the following changeset;

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103080197
Facalderonm (2021-04-18 14:35:12+00:00): Don't worry, the changeset was already reverted
colgza (2021-04-18 14:37:35+00:00): Good, but the same needs to happen in other Latin American cities that I messed up.
colgza (2021-04-18 14:45:55+00:00): The list of cities includes:

- Buenos Aires
- Santiago
- Lima
- Guayaquil
- Quito
- Bucaramanga
- Port of Spain
- Bogotá
- Cartagena
- Barranquilla
- Caracas
- Ciudad de Guatemala
- Ciudad de México
- Puebla
- Léon
- Querétaro
- Guadalajara
- Monterry
colgza (2021-04-18 14:49:55+00:00): I will next be working on undoing the change sets for Buenos Aires.
VictorIE (2022-07-19 17:13:03+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931420224

It says operator=q

Is this Q park?
eireidium (2022-07-19 17:24:06+00:00): Thanks for catching that. Apologies. Had added lot when adding all the microbreweries - that was an auto-square. Sorry. Shawn
syntex (2023-01-11 17:09:23+00:00): Ale osm to nie jest ścisłe odwzorowanie znaków
NorthCrab (2023-01-11 22:18:21+00:00): Osobiście jestem w stanie zrozumieć tą regułę dla primary secondary etc. ale żeby stosować ją także na motorway, trunk to nie jest lekka przesada? dokumentacja jak i tłumaczenie tych słów, jasno stwierdza co oznacza ta droga. czy wycofanie tych zmian nie jest równoważne z mapowaniem pod render? uważam że primary gdzie nie zaczął się oficjalny ciąg drogi ekspresowej byłby jak najbardziej na miejscu.
syntex (2023-01-11 23:37:03+00:00): Ale to jest absurd. Droga nagle zmienia parametry? Nie. Jest ta sama szerokość pasów ich ilość itp. Więc ta granica jest tutaj sztuczna i nie widzę problemu by dociągnąć tą drogę do węzła.
Yunkers (2023-01-12 05:59:41+00:00): Zmienia parametry. Droga ekspresowa i droga ruchu przyspieszonego (GP) to inne kategorie dróg. W praktyce zmienia się chociażby prędkość maksymalna. Większej różnicy to nie robi, chociaż moim zdaniem oznakowanie takich miejsc do znaku jest bardziej czytelne i lepiej odzwierciedla funkcję tej kategorii drogi w osm.
NorthCrab (2023-01-12 06:06:24+00:00): Uważam że parametry drogi powinny być opisywane przez surface/smoothness/track_type a nie highway=trunk/motorway. Te 2 tagi powinny być używane od znaku do znaku.
NorthCrab (2023-01-12 06:07:11+00:00): Założę prędzej czy później temat na forum o to więc chętnie piszcie tutaj jeszcze swoje argumenty, na pewno się przydadzą.
Yunkers (2023-01-12 06:56:27+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że na starym forum dyskusja już o to była, ale szczegółów nie pamiętam.
Jrachi (2021-04-17 08:57:25+00:00): Hai messo come nome "Pomaretto"
Ma se non sbaglio, il nome ufficiale e secondo le linee guida del CAI, dovrebbe essere:
name=Club Alpino Italiano sezione Valgermanasca
Vinber-Pro (2021-04-16 17:00:04+00:00): Bonjour,
concernant le garage, il serait préférable de le positionner sur, dans le batiment ou l'endroit précis. là il semble être au milieu de la route :) ce qui ne doit pas être le cas !
Bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103065037
Vinber-Pro (2021-04-30 13:41:01+00:00): Merci je note que vous avez fait le déplacement, merci. N'hésitez pas à le signaler en réponse ici en commentant :)
sutsisatsi (2021-04-16 15:55:46+00:00): Kiitos, onnistuit nappaamaan keskeisimmät asiat. Pyrin muokkaamaan tarkkaavaisemmin jatkossa 😇
ainki (2021-04-16 16:02:58+00:00): @sutsisatsi Jos jotain jäi lisäämättä niin käy lisäämässä 😄 Yritin poimia mahdollisimman paljon muokkauksia tuohon. Hyvät illanjatkot!
portalaventura (2021-04-16 14:16:47+00:00): Boas-vindas diego souza kira  2021, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2021-04-21 12:41:20+00:00): Hi,
please check this tank, something went wrong with one of the tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8635515745
user_617687 (2021-04-21 13:04:12+00:00): Done! I make the modification. Many thanks
map per (2021-04-17 17:00:46+00:00): Hello Abdullah Al Werfalli,

ist there really a separat, rail like lane (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway)on this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931425891)? Or are the busses driving on the normal road?

Best wishes
map per
map per (2021-05-01 17:29:02+00:00): The bus routes should probably better be tagged as route relations (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Bus_routes)
Jensebluemchen (2023-07-21 10:10:22+00:00): It's a double house with tow Entrys eastside 1d & westside 1c
VA00 (2021-04-21 10:00:29+00:00): Wody to w tym zbiorniku raczej nie ma, strasznie zapuszczony.
portalaventura (2021-04-16 14:48:30+00:00): Boas-vindas CT Ippon de Artes Marciais, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
literan (2021-04-16 16:10:54+00:00): опечатка в адресе :)
literan (2021-04-16 16:11:29+00:00): и ШотлаДский тоже

или там действительно так?
ZinaidaZ (2021-04-16 16:57:32+00:00): Ахаха, ужас какой, не заметила :)
Спасибо!
Поправила
ravali_78 (2021-04-19 03:41:36+00:00): Hi FinL
i have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with residential road way 836019103 Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103161185.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103067200
angys (2021-04-17 02:49:18+00:00): Hello, when you add building, plz feel free to Orthogonalize (Q) the building first.
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Shortcuts

And first, you may draw a square box for one building then you can ctrl c ctrl v to make it same.
ravali_78 (2021-04-19 03:36:13+00:00): Hi FinL
i have fixed the alignment ,as building polygon overlapping with residential road way 836019104.
Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103161185.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103067650