piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2021-07-12 12:39:31+00:00): Hallo tom_frey, 
Danke für Deine Rückmeldung.

Entscheidend für die Highway-Klassifizierung ist die Verkehrsbedeutung (das Verkehrsaufkommen und die Verbindungsfunktion). Der Oberflächen-Zustand ist da nebensächlich.

Diese Straße hat eine Verbindungsfunktion von Obermarchtal nach Oberwachingen u.a. und ist auch entsprechend ausgebaut (Breite und tragfähiger Untergrund).

Ich bitte Dich daher Deine Änderungen wieder zurückzunehmen.

Grüße
PT-53 (2021-07-13 11:58:06+00:00): Hallo tom_frey, 

Danke für die Korrekturen.

Jetzt hätte ich noch eine Bitte für künftige Einträge in OSM:
Bitte trage jeweils einen aussagekräftigen Kommentar im Sinne von "was wurde wo gemacht" an.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_.C3.84nderungssatz-Kommentare

Grüße
Warin61 (2021-07-12 08:53:16+00:00): Hi,
Way 963359153 - farmland is not right. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.72064&lat=-30.15801&zoom=15

The best way to do that is using a multipolygon relation - a simple closed way around the outside (role 'outer' in the relation), then map the unused area as a closed way (role 'inner' within the relation).
Thanks for mapping some farmland. I also tag it with produce=crop.
JoeG (2021-07-12 09:09:07+00:00): Thanks!
user_5359 (2021-12-27 15:16:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963359553 . What is the meaning floating=-1 ? Did you mean level=-1?
ftcat (2021-07-11 12:21:11+00:00): Hi uliwanne,
You have mapped the stream, way 963354419, going over the ridge near where it crosses the provincial boundary, you have also connected the stream to the boundary, both are obviously errors. Maxar imagery is not very clear in this part of Zambia but you can double check with OpenTopoMap imagery to get the correct river directions. Again please do not map tracks around field outlines there are NO tracks here and you will be cluttering up the map with incorrect information.
chnav (2021-07-12 16:55:44+00:00): Здравствуйте, в своихз правках вы удаляете много объектов и перерисовываете их заново. В ОСМ так не принято, объекты надо исправлять. Если что-то удаляете, обязательно пишите причину в комментарии к правке (дом снесли, построен новый объект и т.д.). А кривая геометрия, как в данном случае, не является поводом для удаления. Старайтесь уважать труд предыдущих маперов.
pavvv (2025-01-15 22:58:00+00:00): Skąd ta nazwa "Droga Śródsudecka"?
skquinn (2021-07-11 09:24:56+00:00): Great work!
PeterValo (2023-09-14 21:04:22+00:00): Path 100775258 not passable as of August 2023, overgrown with bushes.
kersentaart (2021-12-17 15:37:28+00:00): Er is toch helemaal geen water in het kasteelpark in Dilsen-Stokkem?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-29 17:44:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431300063/history - are you sure about that name:etymology:wikipedia ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-29 17:45:18+00:00): I opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3418881
ivanbranco (2022-10-29 17:55:06+00:00): It's a copy-past from this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:etymology

no idea why it happened
Warin61 (2021-07-12 08:34:22+00:00): Hi,
Looks to be a conflict between the boundaries and natural features ... they are both using the same nodes .. but for different things.. 
It is really annoying - OSM should have different mapping  skins for the different things; land cover and land features, roads/railways paths and footways, admin boundaries, landuse ... it would make it much easier to edit ... and possibly for data consumers too? 

I'm fixing a 'bear rock' closed way crossing itself ... but as usual when you come across one problem you find 10 more.
DaveF (2021-07-16 21:33:19+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8911227583#map=19/51.66253/-4.07794

When was this installed?
How is it marked?
it seems /very/ close to the junction.
Craftycockney (2021-07-17 11:06:21+00:00): Hello Dave,
Thanks for feedback. I have to admit to not being a 100% sure and the change was made as a result of a flying visit. What exactly is your concern. Cyclable path? Road crossing? Route 4 route? Thanks Chris
DaveF (2021-07-17 14:21:48+00:00): All three.

Are there new NCN signs replacing these?
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.6624783,-4.0793214,3a,40.6y,21.24h,89.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svdtFFpxEVaMDkJeGBXS0bw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Are there new dropped kerbs/ road markings at this new crossing here?
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.6625136,-4.0778864,3a,60y,277.33h,70.71t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqvNy4zxgpLiHhV0rAKklGQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Sustrans still show it to the  South of Castle St.
Craftycockney (2021-07-25 20:33:15+00:00): Must have missed notification of your response. Have reinstated the cycle routes and changed and made ferry road side route a path. I hadn't noticed the cycle lane on the roadside .
Kovoschiz (2021-07-11 10:23:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12796991/ This is an invalid multipolygon. You can't use touching areas to create a larger area. It is what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949541089 is for.
ftcat (2021-07-11 12:30:15+00:00): Hi uliwanne,
The stream, way 963371242, is running in the wrong direction
◪ Jarv (2021-07-11 11:48:03+00:00): Hi Luke.
In this changeset you have made Langney Rise &
Willingdon Drove dual carraigeways at some junctions. As well as making so mini roundabouts into roundabouts. Have the roads here actually changed, the imagery suggest not and I was here about 12 months ago and it wasn't like this, so have recent works changed this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107775408
GeoMapper419 (2021-07-11 11:52:33+00:00): Oh, They haven't changed but I thought I'd make them one way because there's those island crossings and it seems a little unrealistic to have roads going smack bang down the middle of the Crossing. I also made the mini roundabouts more like roundabouts, But they are supposed to represent mini roundabouts still.
◪ Jarv (2021-07-11 12:02:13+00:00): If there is no central reserve then it must be mapped as a single way. Doesn't matter how wide the road is or if there are traffic islands or a wide hatched area.
Mini roundabouts are not the same as roundabouts, again it doesn't matter how big they are, if there is no central island then it must be tagged as a way.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway#Not_dual_carriageways

Would you like to make the changes back, or would you like me to do it?
GeoMapper419 (2021-07-11 12:31:55+00:00): Can you make the changes back please?
I'm really sorry for what I did
◪ Jarv (2021-07-11 14:27:49+00:00): no worries
DaveF (2021-07-12 13:10:46+00:00): Hi
Why have you removed this solar panel node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8044605034/history

Why have you removed these valid hedges:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60183001/history
streckenkundler (2021-07-11 10:50:39+00:00): Sag mal, liest du überhaupt Kommentare? Das hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107749339#map=19/51.94070/13.90172&layers=N gilt auch hier!!!!
tux67 (2023-04-25 15:49:55+00:00): Ist das hier noch Baustelle?
user_3716049 (2023-04-25 18:40:20+00:00): Der zugang zum Hof war am Wochende noch gesperrt. Da hängt noch immer eine Plane die auf die arbeiten Hinweised, wie weit die sind kann deshalb auch nicht sehen.
user_3716049 (2023-09-21 11:17:43+00:00): Update: Soll bis Ende des Jahres fertig
werden.
https://rp-online.de/nrw/staedte/moenchengladbach/fotos-aus-moenchengladbach-so-ist-der-stand-der-bauarbeiten-am-brunnenhof_bid-97636199#5
tastrax (2021-07-13 01:59:19+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SzymonH (2021-07-13 12:42:17+00:00): To nie powinno łączyć dwóch odcinków ul. Towarowej?
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 13:09:39+00:00): Hello,
What was the source of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963377251 that you added here?
I can't see anything obvious on any of the available imagery in OpenStreetMap.
Best Regards,
Andy
novaelezabathea (2021-07-27 10:02:45+00:00): Respected Mam,
I made some mistakes regarding the earlier drawing. I reviewed and rectified most of them in a better way. I think it's one among them. I will use my knowledge at the very best to make it perfect.
SK53 (2023-06-07 18:56:57+00:00): The isolated track near Mousthwaite Comb looks rather odd. It also doesn't seem to be visible on imagery taken in August 2022.
Jethro10 (2023-06-10 07:16:15+00:00): Maybe with a summer picture, the foliage growth obscures the view. Perhaps a winter picture would show things a bit more?
user_8655426 (2021-07-11 11:19:09+00:00): リバートした変更セット:
107771594 107771301 107771280 107771202 107771142 107770058 107767050 107748768 107706196 107706157 107641064 107640976 107640769 107640728 107639170 107639100 107639028

編集者には連絡済みです。
JayTurnr (2021-07-11 11:23:50+00:00): Airport tags all have disused:* prefix as the airport is indefinitely closed, but easy to get back up and running if they decide to reopen
archie (2021-07-13 01:12:18+00:00): Hej, dessa vägar/stigar ligger ovanpå motsvarande sådana (med andra ord; dubbla lager). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963375198
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963382871
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963375197
Skulle du kunna åtgärda detta och bestämma vilka av de dubblerade vägar/stigar som är värda att behålla... Tack!
maasa123 (2021-07-13 09:23:30+00:00): Hej!

Jag fixar, tror att det var min webbläsare som kraschade och stökade till det.
archie (2021-07-13 10:10:46+00:00): Ja såg redan att du hade fixat det. Som vanligt, stort tack!
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
user_11418917 (2021-07-11 14:06:07+00:00): Perfect! if you need any help let me know and I can help! keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107778547
user_12523467 (2021-07-11 14:14:41+00:00): hey, thanks, i'm just updating my city
user_11418917 (2021-07-12 08:59:24+00:00): I'll send you some maps in a few.
Mammi71 (2021-07-20 17:56:06+00:00): Hallo Friedrich Rudolf Wolfram, der Name des bzw. der Künstler gehört nicht in den Namen des Kunstwerks. Kannst Du das Bitte (auch bei weiteren Kunstwerken) noch anpassen? Den artist hast Du ja eigentlich schon getaggt.
Niiepce (2022-01-04 16:29:58+00:00): In diese Bearbeitung war leider ein kleiner Fehler. Ich habe ihn verbessert.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-16 07:47:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963386041/history - jakie jest źródło dla tej nazwy?

What is the source for this name claim?
conifermapper (2024-08-16 09:05:26+00:00): The source of this name is from a survey, the tourist signs in the area have maps of the meadows and their names.

conifermapper
archie (2021-07-11 19:24:02+00:00): Hej, i det här cs har du korsat vägdragningen (self-intersection ways) flera gånger. Se https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=12.58526&lat=57.94614&zoom=15. Vänligen åtgärda detta. Tack!
maasa123 (2021-07-11 23:18:29+00:00): Fixat i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107800350#map=16/57.9459/12.5853
archie (2021-07-12 00:04:46+00:00): Tusen tack!
Szymon9 (2021-07-27 14:41:54+00:00): Hej, dlaczego masowo zmieniasz drogi w highway=seceondary? To powinny być zwykle drogi wojewódzkie. Poczytaj tutaj co jest napisane https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce
MCalaOSM (2024-06-26 16:14:47+00:00): Ciao ma questo changset https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963388066/history

Cosè una piazza un area pedonale o cosa? I
La piazza è già in area pedonale, a un nome? Un caro saluto
Nino Galante (2024-06-26 16:28:35+00:00): Si tratta di una piazzetta che informalmente (in attesa di un atto ufficiale richiesto al Comune dalla Consulta del Centro Storico) viene detta piazzetta Belvedere. Non è area pedonale (anzi viene utilizzata come parcheggio auto dai residenti della zona) e andrebbe rimosso il tag area=yes lasciando il valore place=square
MCalaOSM (2024-06-26 18:07:36+00:00): E già infatti x questo chiede, come al solito sei stato gentilissimo e dettagliatissimo.
abakus_uploader (2021-07-11 22:32:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2021-07-11 22:32:04+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse (2021-07-11 12:30:35+00:00): The change to "Pretty Wood" here was prompted by finding a sign for it some way to the south.
Niiepce (2022-01-04 16:11:39+00:00): Diese Bearbeitung war leider falsch. Ich habe sie verbessert.
eggie (2021-07-11 13:14:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

De uitzondering voor tweewielers stond hier al aangegeven volgens de verouderde tagging met cycleway=opposite
Die regel mag nu weg.
Wanneer het ook voor brommers geldt dan ook oneway:moped=no en oneway=mofa=no toevoegen
Zo te zien moet je de brug ook nog voorzien. 
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107780756

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
bytehouwer (2021-07-11 14:01:09+00:00): De route stuurde me de verkeerde kant op, dacht dat dat te maken had met het eenrichtingsverkeer. Nieuwe labelling is wel logischer. Zal ik het sluisje dan ook nog maar doen? En de oude tagging weghalen, of breekt dat iemand anders zijn software?
bytehouwer (2021-07-11 14:02:31+00:00): (was geen probleem met eenrichting, maar iets anders zag ik later)
eggie (2021-07-11 14:12:59+00:00): Je kunt gewoon de verouderde taggingregel verwijderen. (Laten staan kan overigens geen kwaad. )
Dan wel even kijken of het ook voor moped en mofa geldt.
Beide manier van taggen werkt, maar elk land is dus weer anders en heeft andere onderborden. 
eggie
eggie (2021-07-11 14:27:23+00:00): Even gespiekt op straatkijk.. 
oneway:moped=no
oneway:mofa=no 
zou je nog kunnen toevoegen. 
dat geeft het onderbord aan. 
MVG
eggie
fkv (2021-07-16 09:03:49+00:00): Es bringt mich immer in Panik, wenn jemand an etwas herumeditiert, was ich schon genau gemappt hatte, denn meistens handelt es sich um Verschlimmbesserungen. Aber solang du nur Tags hinzufügst wie beim Denkmal, ist es ok. Die ??? in der Denkmalinschrift lauten "Nep.", was sicherlich für "Nepomuk" steht. Das Türl gegenüber ist nach meiner Erinnerung nicht verboten (access=no), sondern nur versperrt (locked=yes).
Dobinger (2021-07-16 22:29:14+00:00): Lass mich überlegen: in einem Quellschutzgebiet, das eine Millionenstadt versorgt, ist ein Türl versperrt - das lässt den Schluss zu, dass der Grundeigentümer (Gem. Wien, Wasserwerke Wien...) den Zutritt da nicht grundlos einschränkt/verbietet (bspw. Quellfassung).
fkv (2021-07-16 22:48:21+00:00): In OSM erfassen wir die realen Zustände und keine Überlegungen. Ich könnte dir jetzt lang was zu der Geschichte der Absperrungen in dem Gebiet erzählen, aber darauf kommt es gar nicht an. Nach einem in Österreich geltenden Rechtsgrundsatz ist alles erlaubt, was nicht explizit verboten ist.
streckenkundler (2021-07-11 15:05:13+00:00): Hei,
Oh, es gibt eine Aufabe für Knotenpunkte? Sehr, sehr schön!

Ich werde mir das recht bald mal anschauen und die Knotenpunkte ins Netz einbauen, das ist nicht ganz so einfach, man braucht etwas Erfahrung und sollte mit mit JOSM gemacht werden. Aber du hast ja alle nötigen Infos hinterlassen. Danke. 

Du kannst dir mal bitte diesen Kreisverkehr https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.73753&mlon=14.63963#map=18/51.73753/14.63963&layers=N anschauen. da müsste Knotenpunkt 19 sein.  

Weiter so!

Grüße aus Lübben,

Sven
sebkur (2021-07-11 17:20:32+00:00): Hallo Sven,
das Theme für MapComplete ist noch nicht offiziell, ich entwickle es gerade erst und habe es heute zum ersten Mal ausprobiert.

Genau, die Idee ist, vor Ort alle notwendigen Infos zu hinterlassen und dann im Nachhinein in JOSM oder iD nachzuarbeiten. Wollte mich gerade dran machen und jetzt sehe ich, dass du mir sogar schon zuvor gekommen bist. Großartig!

Ich bin noch kein Experte mit den Knotenpunkt-Relationen, insbesondere die komplizierten Fälle wie die 96 bereiten mir noch Kopfzerbrechen. Ich hab das hier gelesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging
aber steige noch nicht 100% durch.

Die 19 schaue ich mir gerne zeitnah mal vor Ort an.

Viele Grüße aus Forst,
Sebastian
streckenkundler (2021-07-11 18:34:27+00:00): Hei Sebastian,
Ach gerne doch. Ich bin zur Zeit im "Knotenpunktnetzmodus"... ich unterstütze einen Mapper in Senftenberg... 
Mit dem  Knotenpunkten an Kreisverkehren (96) muß ich selbst mit JOSM jedesmal überlegen, wie es richtig ist...
Das in Kürze, ich bin Mobil unterwegs. 

Sven
eggie (2021-07-11 13:18:32+00:00): Dag byteh.. beter geen adressen toevoegen aan cde gebouwomtrek.
De naam van de school taggen we tegenwoordig op de adresnode met nog amenity=school .
Het schoolterrein met landuse=education en voor de huidige rendering nog amenity=school , college of university.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-11 13:26:31+00:00): Vinseschool Haarlemmerstraat als voorbeeld aangepast.
Graag de bestaande adresnodes gebruiken. 
MVG
eggie
bytehouwer (2021-07-11 13:46:08+00:00): Ik zie de naam van de school nu helemaal nergens meer. Waar is het name field dan voor bedoeld?

Met bestaande adressnode gebruiken bedoel je dat het niet nodig is om de default aan te passen?
eggie (2021-07-11 14:10:14+00:00): De naam van de school is gewoon zichtbaar. Soms paar keer ctrl-F5 
Je cache leegmaken.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.38113/4.89034

In OSM Nederland importeren we de gebouwen met de adresnodes vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)
We zijn ooit overgeschakeld naar het gebruik van de adresnodes.

Editor iD is een algemene wereldwijd gebruikte editor, maar de manier van taggen van de verschillende landen verschilt soms.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-07-11 14:17:15+00:00): Hier wat leesvoer over het taggen van scholen
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72837

De consensus ontstaat via de mailinglist (Talk)  of via het forum van OSM
Neus maar eens rond op het forum. Je kunt jezelf toevoegen in het sticky wie wat waar. 
Inlog identiek aan oSM account met wat wachttijd wegens accountcheck.
Mapse
eggie
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
zstadler (2021-07-13 13:38:51+00:00): שלום דרור וברוך הבא ל 
OSM!

ראשית, תודה שאתה ממפה את השכונה החדשה ותורם ל 
OSM
 באופן כללי!

כמו שעניתי לפוסט שלך בפייסבוק, מטבע הדברים תעשה טעויות ובהתחלה לא תדע איך עושים כל מני דברים

בבקשה אל תיתן לדרכים שמות שהם תאור כמו :"שביל שכונתי", "דרך לא סלולה", "שכונת אבוקדו", או "העוקף עד החניה". שמות של דרכים צריכים להיות "שם עצם פרטי" כמו: "הרצל" או "סמטת צאלון".

בהצלחה,
זאב
zstadler (2025-05-30 11:56:32+00:00): Resoled by changeset 116785079
ivanbranco (2021-08-23 15:42:36+00:00): The wiki also says "Ideally, a key is one word, in lowercase, using British English if possible." Is there not a British English word for this tag? 

The wiki also says: "You can use any tags you like, but please document them here on the OpenStreetMap wiki, even if self-explanatory."