piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patchanka (2022-04-14 18:40:14+00:00): la modif est faite ! Merci pour votre réponse.
N'hésitez pas à faire d'autres modifications
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-04-14 15:58:29+00:00): Hello, are you sure you have not mistaken?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=131998146063476&focus=photo&lat=59.423588265918&lng=24.782336962546992&z=17
pesec (2022-04-14 08:18:53+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Данным пакетом правок вы испортили геометрию объектов и совершили ряд нарушений. 
Изучите пожалуйста правила редактирования.
Пакет правок отменен.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-19 09:25:15+00:00): Please don't delete the history. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-19 09:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.
eggie (2022-04-13 14:56:37+00:00): Dag P AMS

Lijkt me oke.. Wellicht de straatnaam toevoegen?

MVG
eggie
ParkingAMS (2022-04-13 15:20:50+00:00): Dag Eggie, als deze straat een straatnaam heeft kan ik hem niet vinden.
eggie (2022-04-13 15:43:20+00:00): Wanneer het echt alleen maar om te parkeren is dan kun je het ook yaggen met highway=service en service=parking_aisle.. Dan zal het geen naam hebben.
Beetje twijfelgeval.
Straatnamen staan in de BGT omtrekgericht.. ook op de site van de bgt. Kadaster staan de straatnamen.
Even googlen naar verbeterdekaart kadaster.
ParkingAMS (2022-04-14 07:57:32+00:00): Dank voor de tip. Verbeterdekaart.nl geeft ook geen straatnaam voor deze straat. Lijkt inderdaad alleen om te parkeren. Zal de tags aanpassen.
eggie (2022-04-13 14:59:42+00:00): Oke.. weer iets actueler.

noexit=yes hoort op de eindnode en niet op de straat zelf.
Een highway=crossing alleen maar maken als er iets van strepen op de weg staat en/of een zebra.
Niet elke kruising is een highway=crossing in de zin van...
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
ParkingAMS (2022-04-13 15:24:38+00:00): Ik heb de noexit=yes weggehaald van de straat. De highway=crossing had ik volgens mij niet toegevoegd en zie ik ook niet. Of kijk ik er langs?
eggie (2022-04-13 15:45:10+00:00): Die crossing heb je toegevoegd met het fietspad op de node. Niet de node weghalen, maar wel de tag.
eggie (2022-04-13 15:46:44+00:00): noexit=yes heb ik op de eindnode gezet. De highway=crossing kun je evt. zelf weghalen.
ParkingAMS (2022-04-14 07:47:11+00:00): Goeiemorgen, eggie, ik zie idd dat dat eindnode op noexit=yes is gezet. De highway=crossing tag zie ik zelf niet. Bij mij staan er maar 2 tags: highway=residential en name=Alexanderkade
eggie (2022-04-14 08:53:17+00:00): Klopt Die highway=cossing  (Dat is een oversteekplaats.. dus geen kruising)  heb ik verwijderd middels deze changeset.
Wellicht is dat iets van de wonderlijke  editor iD die je dan dwingt bij kruisende wegen crossing in te vullen?

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-04-14 08:54:20+00:00): typo crossing
Mijn aanpassing https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119698211
literan (2022-04-13 19:19:15+00:00): Chaotic roads status change. Suppose, this changeset should be reverted
user_15552334 (2022-04-13 19:26:23+00:00): @literan
Some roads that are trunk roads irl or tracks irl I fixed.
I watch as many videos and use images to get my edits as accurately as possible, and do hours of research, I also calculate   if it is a trunk road or not depending on the importance of the route.
If there is anything you wanna see fixed that I did change just reply here, also some of the changeset contains some important stuff.
literan (2022-04-13 20:07:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296946250 it's not trunk (did u read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification ?? suppose, not)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/-19.4626/44.5484 that's not trunk
julcnx (2022-04-14 01:27:40+00:00): R66_Mapper: you joined only 2 days ago and you start changing the classification of major roads in multiple countries around the world where you don't even live ? what is seriously wrong with you people? If you really want to do good by contributing to OSM: map locally and slowly. Someone please review his changesets and if necessary revert all of them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119670913
sarveshg (2022-04-17 14:34:49+00:00): which place you work in map
literan (2022-04-17 19:23:13+00:00): I will revert this changeset
user_15552334 (2022-07-17 11:51:14+00:00): "What is wrong with you people"
What is wrong your mum you fatherless child
snoozingnewt (2022-07-28 23:31:25+00:00): Don't be so rude please
limes11 (2023-09-22 18:39:44+00:00): Hi!

Ich habe hier einige der Felsen korrigiert. Diese Felsen sind Naturdenkmäler und damit 

boundary=protected_area
protect_class=7

und kein leisure=nature_reserve und auch kein 'denotation'.

Falls Du noch mehr davon erfasst :)

VG Limes
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-19 09:17:35+00:00): If driveways are tagged wrong you should change tags not delete the way.
David Rook (2022-04-19 14:37:38+00:00): Not sure what you're referring to.  Comment says "remove phantom features".  The aerial photo layer I saw did not support the existence of the feature in question so the "way" was removed.  Some dirt trails revert back to nature and I believe the map needs to be updated when that happens.
David Rook (2022-04-19 14:45:21+00:00): There are lots of driveways that were automatically tagged "residential" by some misguided bot and I've changed hundreds of tags for them.  I don't remember deleting any in the manner you describe but I suppose it's not impossible. If you can give me a lat/long I'll take another look.
David Rook (2022-04-19 14:53:52+00:00): I added a missing driveway and changed a few "residential roads" to driveways in the area in question.  Hope I resolved the issue you had.  If not just let me know what I missed :-)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-19 15:51:35+00:00): Sorry about the way I worded that. I appreciate your work on removing non-existent roads. Their was the one major (incorrectly tagged) driveway that led to some service roads that were left disconnected. Which it looks like you added back.
Thanks
ctrncrvlh (2022-04-13 14:32:00+00:00): *à esquerda
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-19 09:16:02+00:00): reverted
ParadoX_ZLWC (2022-04-20 03:16:37+00:00): 华山南枢纽立交（威青、龙青）部分匝道标成了在建状态，请问有来源依据吗？
FJili (2022-08-08 19:25:24+00:00): 不好意思过了这么久才看到，因为本变更集的目的不是改道路，我想应该是用JOSM filter的时候操作失误，已手动改正。
PT-53 (2022-04-24 16:11:52+00:00): Hallo Nonexhudlix,
Du hast bei dieser TR
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2907398/history
das Merkmal
restriction=only_straight_on
abgeändert auf
restriction=no_left_turn

Das ist falsch. Only_straight_on ist ein "Gebot" so zu fahren (from - via - to) und paßte mit den from- und to-ways überein. no_left_turn ist ein Verbot so zu fahren (from - via - to) und paßt mit den from- und to-ways nicht überein.

Berichtigst Du das wieder oder soll ich das machen?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Nonexhudlix (2022-04-26 19:40:15+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.

Hatte das inzwischen schon korrigiert, allerdings als restriction=no_left_turn belassen und die Kirchberger Straße (219578718) als "to" way verwendet. Ist zwar anders als die urspüngliche Lösung, aber sollte die identische Wirkung haben.
PT-53 (2022-04-27 07:22:45+00:00): Ja, so müßte es jetzt passen.
Supaplex (2022-04-13 17:01:53+00:00): 石牌一帶
mariotomo (2022-04-14 15:33:06+00:00): might be useful to have the path leading there from the hotel.
eggie (2022-04-13 15:21:06+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo. 
Wat ik veel gebruik is de transparante achtergrond van de BGT omtrekgericht. Alles in Nederland is immers ingemeten.
Dan kun je precies zien waar de wegas loopt.

Hier wat leesvoer. De ervaren mappers mappen met editor JOSM. Die heeft al die mogelijkheden om achtergronden in te stellen.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 

BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

en het kan ook nog met de voorgekookte achtergrond
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 

Wanneer je doorzet zul je toch niet aan josm ontkomen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-04-13 15:24:37+00:00): Als voorbeeld nog zo'n parkeervakgedeelte toegevoegd..  Let op de tagging hoe ik dat doe, want het is geen parkeerterrein in de zin van. 
Je krijgt dan niet van die grote P's. 
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
parking:orientation=diagonal
ParkingAMS (2022-04-13 15:27:08+00:00): Dank Eggie voor al deze tips en het voorbeeld! Ik zal er naar gaan kijken.
pesec (2022-04-14 08:18:27+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Данным пакетом правок вы испортили геометрию объектов и совершили ряд нарушений. 
Изучите пожалуйста правила редактирования.
Пакет правок отменен.
mavl (2022-04-14 16:19:38+00:00): Здравствуйте, edfsgfgbfx.  
Изучение можно начать с этих ссылок:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:FAQ  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
user_5359 (2022-05-02 05:38:30+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1051558632. What is the meaning of the tag 338-1 = gate?
ESVL (2022-05-02 09:25:41+00:00): It's my fault. I deleted the tag. Thanks.
DressyPear4 (2022-04-14 23:29:27+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119672900
Patchanka (2022-04-14 11:44:26+00:00): bonjour
Bienvenue et merci pour vos contributions.
J'ai fait quelques corrections sur le parc "Exotic Parc" car il y avait des problèmes, des doublons...
J'ai aussi rajouté un bâtiment et des cheminements piétons.
Si vous êtes sur place ou connaissez bien les lieux, n'hésitez pas à compléter ou corriger !
bonne journée
eggie (2022-04-13 15:26:50+00:00): Oke.. en dat zet je op de eindnode 
noexit=yes  (doodlopende straat symbool)
eggie (2022-04-14 07:33:57+00:00): highway=crossing verwijderd
silversurfer83 (2022-04-13 17:00:42+00:00): Hi,
ich sehe schon, dass du ein alter Hase bist und will dir keineswegs vorschreiben, wie du zu mappen hast und deshalb möchte ich dich an dieser Stelle 
- erstens Fragen: Warum verschiebst du die Bänke auf die Wege? Stehen die nich üblicherweise daneben? Falls sie wirklich AUF dem Weg stehen, sehe ich das ein, sie auf den Weg zu legen.
- zweitens freundlich bitten, deine CS-Kommentare etwas aussagekräftiger zu gestalten, damit ich als lokaler Mapper schneller erfassen kann, was du schönes geändert hast. So muss ich jedes mal dein CS bei achavi reinschmeißen um zu sehen, was passiert ist.

Hoffe, du hast/hattest eine angenehme Zeit am Diemelsee

Grüße aus Korbach
mtbbiker99 (2022-04-14 08:39:52+00:00): Hi 

Danke für das Feedback. Zu 1. Die Bänke waren schon teilweise auf den Weg getagged, wollte das auch schon korrigieren. Ich habe die Schutzhütte ,(steht seit 2018 da, laut dem Schild) diverse Picknick Plätze, ein paar Sitzbänke, den Imbiss am Strand nähe Brücke und den Hundestrand getagged. In Heringhausen: ein Weg hinzugefügt, einen Fußweg am Campingplatz zu ende getagged.  2. Diverse: u.a Wegeverlaufkorrektur -- hier sollte ich wirklich nähere Infos dazu schreiben;-)  ich , das liest eh keiner... Gruß aus dem Center Parcs , ab morgen  wieder Ruhrpott
silversurfer83 (2022-04-14 11:23:02+00:00): Gute Heimreise noch :)

ich gucke mir schon regelmäßig mittels whodidit die Änderungen in einem ca. 50km-Radius um Korbach an um ein Auge auf vorsätzlichen oder versehentlichen Vandalismus zu haben. Da hilft es mir schon, wenn in den CS-Kommentaren was hilfreiches steht. Ist also nicht alles nur für den Äther ;)
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 10:37:57+00:00): It's not certain whether a bridge box should use `embankment=`.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 10:06:01+00:00): Please stop deleting other things that exist.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 10:13:24+00:00): What's wrong with it???
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 10:14:00+00:00): Can you explain how water sudden turn towards a hill and flow across it?
kapazao (2022-04-16 11:05:50+00:00): Buenas, he estado revisando los cambios por encima y no entiendo bien qué es lo que has querido hacer.
Hay unas líneas que no son nada indicando que se llaman edificio 1 o 2. Sobre lo del "Edificio 2" no entiendo nada, ¿qué tiene que ver con el hotel?
El etiquetado que veo no parece correcto. Deberías revisar Osmose y ver los errores que marca por ejemplo.
Explica un poco esto si puedes para entenderlo y ver cómo podemos corregirlo.
Un saludo
Pipeton (2022-04-16 11:19:09+00:00): Hola, mi intención era representar el Corte Inglés de la calle Arabial de la mejor forma posible. Está dividido en 2 partes, una al norte de la plaza (con el Hipercor), el número 97, y otra al sur, el número 95. El número 97 es el Edificio 1 (de ahí que el edificio ahora tenga ese nombre) y el número 95 es el Edificio 2. Pero el Edificio 2 ocupa solo las 2 primeras plantas de los edificios dónde está el Hotel Luna (a pesar de que ahora mismo están representados como edificios distintos están conectados entre sí por lo menos en la tienda).
Lo he representado de la mejor forma que se me ocurría, con un área ocupando el sitio dónde está situada la tienda, y el área tiene el nombre de Edificio 2 porque así dice el Corte Inglés que se llama, y con la dirección.
https://www.elcorteingles.es/centroscomerciales/es/eci/centros/centro-comercial-arabial
Aquí se ve lo que digo. Entiendo que no es lo más correcto, pero no sé me ocurría mejor forma de representarlo. Si se te ocurre algo mejor, estoy encantado de hacer los cambios pertinentes.
Un saludo.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 10:14:51+00:00): Ok you moved some of it. But does the other one not exist?
Kovoschiz (2022-04-14 10:12:01+00:00): There is also an `alt_name=` here. Handling different summits is tricky.
Mudumala (2022-04-29 11:33:38+00:00): Hi Fibar22,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this region, I observed that some of the ways such as way 1051584239,way 1051584238,way 1051584240
are created as service roads, But looking at this Farm Land would suggest that track road classification can be given in this case. Please let us know if you think otherwise

Regards
Rajeswari
Frans S (2022-04-24 09:06:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)

D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.

E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.

G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119676695
Basstoelpel (2022-04-28 20:55:40+00:00): Hallo Bergischer,

aus welcher Quelle stammt diese Adreßangabe und warum ist sie nicht komplett?

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
Bergischer (2022-04-29 06:44:34+00:00): Du meinst, die fehlende Hausnummer? 

Ansonsten hier: 

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Baudenkmale_in_Lindhorst
E de Wit (2022-04-13 20:21:10+00:00): Ik heb het adres zelf hersteld in changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119684565

-E de Wit
eggie (2022-04-14 05:22:01+00:00): Beste René...  Je commentaar is steeds ik ben langs hier gewandeld op.


Zou je in het vervolg concreet willen aangeven wat je hebt toegevoegd en/of veranderd.
Bv Adresnode verwijderd. 
MVG
eggie
HellMap (2022-12-19 13:12:28+00:00): Sveiki!

Pamanīju, ka esi pievienojis `bicycle=designated` vairākām ietvēm/celiņiem (piemēram, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051590254/history vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689019882/history).

Vai tie visi tiešām ir ar ceļa zīmi apzīmēti veloceliņi (kopēji/dalīti)?

Paldies.
Patchanka (2022-04-14 17:19:29+00:00): Bonjour

je vois que vous avez modifié le nom de la ville (name) pour mettre son nom en basque et supprimé les tags wikidata et wikipedia.
Dans OSM, en France, il est prévu de mettre le name en français, l'euskara ayant parfaitement sa place dans le tag name:eu prévu à cet effet, et rendu dans certains fonds de plan (que vous utilisez si j'en crois l'imagerie utilisée pour votre changeset, également ici : https://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?layers=0000000B0FFFFFF)

De plus, pourquoi avoir supprimé les deux tags (wikidata et wikipedia) ? Il ne me semble pas y avoir de raison, est-ce une erreur ?

Par ailleurs, pourriez-vous donner plus d'informations dans vos commentaires de changeset, à propos des modifications apportées dans OSM et de vos sources ?

merci d'avance
Patchanka (2022-04-15 17:01:09+00:00): j'annule le changeset
gscholz (2022-04-14 05:05:29+00:00): Hi amelia bowles,
this changeset dos not make any sense, I have reverted it.
Before you continue to contribute to OSM please read this:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind Regards
Guido
Kovoschiz (2022-04-14 10:04:05+00:00): Please explain this. It's not "spam" if it exists.
lacek (2022-04-14 17:09:58+00:00): What's the principle or thresholds (like radius and elevation) do you determine a saddle or peak "exists" and worth putting an annotation?

What is the origin of the names "七姊妹山" and "Seven Sisters Ranges"?
I'd love to see an explanation as well. I lives in the neighborhood for decades and have never heard of people calling this "ridge" by these names. Try Google and there's not even a single relevant result.

I've been to the region in person quite a number of times and I didn't remember observing the peaks, saddles or a ridge there. The contour lines and satellite view also tell the same story.

Moreover, why would one name a ridge by 山 (mountain/hill in Chinese)?
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 09:19:48+00:00): 1. That one I do not know. Although he cited a book, the user has been reported. 
2. Other users have added back  other ones themselves. Some have also added names (although I don't pursuit the validity of them much) for others in the areas. They seem ok. 
3. What contour lines are you looking at? A `=ridge` doesn't have to be as sharp as visible from aerial. There is eg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=arete for that. See examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=ridge they don't have to be very recognizable either.
Nathan_A_RF (2022-04-23 21:21:12+00:00): Isn't it implied that the maxheight on a motorway is default unless stated otherwise?
Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle (2022-04-24 08:06:51+00:00): Perhaps. Either way, that's apparently not what StreetComplete was seeing as it offered the prompt. I think maybe it's just an unknown until defined or something, not sure.
Nathan_A_RF (2022-04-24 18:01:57+00:00): Regardless, the height tag should only be applied to a section of road directly under the bridge, as the wiki recommends
Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle (2022-04-25 11:06:12+00:00): Yeah, that makes sense. I did go down the whole road, to be sure, but yes that would make more sense.
Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle (2022-04-25 11:06:46+00:00): Maybe I'll file a bug and let them know. Can you point me at the relevant wiki page?
trigpoint (2022-04-25 12:01:54+00:00): I suspect the bug you should be reporting is that it is checking motorway bridges at all. If a motorway bridge is anything other than default then there has been an epic fail on behalf of the builders.

https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues
gpserror (2022-09-06 16:13:25+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051594775 seems very short to be a bike "route" ... was this complete?  Also this is overlapping a road, which is a violation - which lead me to this in the first place.  Know more about this route to make it better?
VA00 (2023-05-21 07:14:03+00:00): Na drogę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051598266 nie na w tej chwili chyba żadnego wjazdu, prowadzi donikąd. Nie widzę jej też na orto, ale nie chcę kasować bez upewnienia się.
krusefahrer (2022-04-13 17:38:39+00:00): Do you also fix adjacent features like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791959130 for example?
zluuzki (2022-04-14 07:19:29+00:00): If i would try to fix everything i see, i'll be sitting here until my last day - without break
ZeLonewolf (2022-04-14 16:49:33+00:00): Harassments account krusefahrer documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Sockpuppets
4004 (2022-04-18 01:53:28+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
мы такое в название не пишем, я поправлю на номер. лучше всего смотреть в османде
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 06:35:26+00:00): Do not make temporary edits just for your silly golf game.  This is vandalism and will be treated as such.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-14 10:18:18+00:00): Ok thx, I will accept this solution. What I thought is there is already https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897549860 that it may not be helpful to show they belong to it.
danieldegroot2 (2022-04-14 00:23:02+00:00): Hey tmerc58,

I believe you are unable to use this data in OpenStreetMap.
https://www.standish.org/assessor/files/cemetery-location-map
(via https://www.standish.org/advanced-search?keywords=cemeteries )

The standish.org website has a disclaimer with the following license:
non-commercial, non-deriviative

"
LICENSE AND SITE ACCESS: We grant you a limited and non-exclusive license to access and make use of the Site and not to download (other than page caching) or modify it, or any portion of it, except with our express prior written consent.  This license does not include any right to sell or make commercial use of the Site or its contents; any derivative use of the Site or its contents; or any use of data mining, robots, or similar data gathering and extraction tools.  You may not frame or use framing techniques to enclose any trademark, logo, or any other proprietary information (including images, text, page layout, or form) belonging to us or to any third party without our express prior written consent, or the express prior written consent of the owner of the same.  You may not use any meta tags or any other “hidden text” utilizing any trademarks without the express prior written consent of the owner of the same.
"
https://www.standish.org/home/pages/website-disclaimer-and-privacy-policy

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Compatible_license
(and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_License )

Thanks for your reply in advance.

Regards,

Daniel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
literan (2022-04-13 19:07:17+00:00): пока получается фигня. Одно здание, в нем другие здания. Не понимаю, что вы этим хотите сказать
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-17 14:02:06+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051577905/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
Wangha0 (2024-03-18 01:30:39+00:00): It is under construction.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-18 18:12:34+00:00): that is expressed by highway=construction

I will remove construction = construction then