piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kryniczan (2021-03-21 07:40:12+00:00): Macie racje, przepraszam za niezamierzony wandalizmy. Edytując staram się sprawdzać, czy nie nadpisuję nowszych zmian niż mam materiał, ale w tym przypadku dałem plamę. Dziękuję za wycofanie zmiany.
AndyB_66 (2021-03-21 08:57:26+00:00): Najświeższe i aktualne informacje znajdziesz na forum SSC: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/forums/infrastruktura-drogowa.240/
:)
sannkc (2021-03-19 23:39:40+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!  When adding buildings, please remember to square the building before saving (right-click on the building and select Square or use the shortcut Q).  Also, before editing the map, always make sure that the imagery you are using is properly aligned and adjust it accordingly or use better aligned imagery.  The Maxar imagery for St. Louis is not well-aligned, so it's probably best to stick with the default Bing imagery.  The building in this changeset is far closer to the street than it should be based on the more commonly used imagery.
AgusQui (2021-03-27 17:14:23+00:00): la referencia de ruta esta en la etiqueta ref, no hace falta ponerla en el nombre
olo81 (2021-03-27 12:31:51+00:00): Teraz zrobiłeś 3 hotele a jest tylko jeden, do poprawy
C2oc4 (2021-03-28 05:59:24+00:00): poprawione
sannkc (2021-03-19 23:56:58+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM! When adding buildings, please remember to square each building before saving (right-click on the building and select Square or use the shortcut Q). Also, please be sure to trace the building exactly as it appears in the imagery so as not to misrepresent the actual shape/location of the building.
SekeRob (2021-03-20 15:54:41+00:00): Hi,

The tag check machine proposes adding brand tags "This name is very common, is this store part of the brand network? node 6721186054 josm iD edit
fix-josm fix-edit brand = Speed Queen brand:wikidata = Q7575499
brand:wikipedia = en:Speed Queen

No idea if they're one and the same. Since you seem to know them, kindly check if this would be correct.

cheers.
MTB FORIS (2021-03-19 22:19:42+00:00): This fake photo was not taken on this plotted path, but on the path next to it. The map drawn is this one drawn in OSM and it is marked with bicycle markings, so that cyclists can go through the single track forest path in this part.
@sava eskimo, please stop posting fake content in order to harm and degrade our work
@Administrators please respond
SomeoneElse (2021-03-19 23:12:19+00:00): @MTB FORIS - perhaps you should share your own photo of this location?

The Exif Data suggests a location close to the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919249493 , but something a few meters away would still be "close" and yet not on the path, of course.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_10654882 (2021-03-20 08:21:58+00:00): MTB FORIS has deleted a valid image with EXIF data. He has long since lost his credibility by lying that my photos are not valid and that I am directed against their work.
sannkc (2021-03-19 23:55:26+00:00): Hello!  Please take a second look at this edit. Is this a newly added building that you know to exist based on personal knowledge? 
 If so, it seems likely that the parking lot should be removed/adjusted to account for the new building.  If not, please delete the building.
sannkc (2021-03-19 23:50:23+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM! When adding buildings, please remember to square the building before saving (right-click on the building and select Square or use the shortcut Q).
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-20 17:26:56+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2587138#map=19/10.49599/-66.89154&layers=N ?
sannkc (2021-03-19 23:49:11+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM! When adding buildings, please remember to square the building before saving (right-click on the building and select Square or use the shortcut Q). Also, please be sure to trace the exact shape of the building appears in the imagery (not just four corners) so as not to misrepresent the actual shape/location of the building.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-20 17:28:06+00:00): What is the source of that edit?
Glassman (2021-03-21 20:30:50+00:00): Is it possible that the park boundaries extend into the lake? I know that no uncommon for State Parks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101355832
ajack99 (2021-03-21 22:35:59+00:00): Hi Glassman, You are correct. It appeared the lines were unattributed to anything but I seem to have misinterpreted. 
The local documentation does have the park property extending into the lake. https://yarrowpointwa.gov/morningside-park-2/

Can you roll my change back? I can't figure out how to do that. 
I thought it was weird the main part of the park, atop the hill, was included as a wetland, which it is not. There is a clear park, then forest, then wetland. My main goal was to change the wetland designation atop the hill.
Glassman (2021-03-21 23:47:19+00:00): I rolled back your changeset. (There is a feature in JOSM, a somewhat more advanced editor, that allows for reverting changeset.) According to the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) there is a wetlands covering the entire area including the park. I'm in Skagit county and have been working with a hydrology layer for the past few months. There are areas that I wouldn't have expected to find a wetlands. It maybe their definition of wetlands that causes the confusion. 

The current NHD has a slightly different coverage than what we have mapped but not a significant difference.
Glassman (2021-03-21 23:49:06+00:00): I noticed that no one as added in trails in the park. The link you provided wasn't clear if there were tails there or not.
ajack99 (2021-03-22 02:53:55+00:00): There is a trail there, but it's steep and appears unmaintained, so I don't plan to add it. Definitely dangerous in the wet.

Where are you seeing the USGS/NHD designating the park a wetland all the way up to 95th ave? In the Markup app, it looks like the wetland is correctly labeled at the bottom of the hill https://edits.nationalmap.gov/markup-app, and that's the same with the national wetland inventory https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/ (viewing each without an account)
ajack99 (2021-03-22 02:54:06+00:00): thanks for help with the rollback
Glassman (2021-03-22 05:34:10+00:00): The NHD version I'm using comes from the USFS Hydrology layer. It show the wetlands ending just east of where 97th Ave NE would be if it was extended through the park. Using the Maxar Premium background layer, you can see the difference in the tree color. The lighter green is in the wetlands while the darker green that extends to 95th is not. Feel free to change it. While I used to live next to Gas Works, I never spent any time in Yarrow Bay.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-30 04:09:08+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143342045
baumann3141 (2021-03-20 01:19:00+00:00): thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101356057
mdejean (2021-03-28 00:00:55+00:00): Does a road become a highway=trunk by virtue of having one grade separation? I think not.
ZLima12 (2021-03-28 00:05:07+00:00): If you think that stretch is too short to warrant a change in classification, I would be fine with reverting it back to primary. I just felt that the higher classification is noticable as you drive down that road.
mdejean (2021-03-28 13:45:21+00:00): In general, I'd say the classification of a road is about its function - how the road is used, and that does not change over the course of one intersection.
ZLima12 (2021-03-28 18:03:43+00:00): My main rationale was that the highway=primary went up to meet Tuckahoe Road, while the route under serves as somewhat of a bypass. There are no properties that can be accessed from this bypass, and it feels like a more significant, limited-access road. I thought those differences would be good to show, which is why I made the bypass highway=trunk. But again, if we think it's too insignificant of a segment, we can switch it back.
mdejean (2021-03-28 18:34:10+00:00): I'd say for a segment of a road to merit a different classification from the rest it would need to have a signficant amount of people using just that section. To give a nearby example the Bronx River Parkway can be separated into the highway=motorway section (no traffic lights) south of the Sprain Brook merge and the highway=trunk section north of it because there are many users who will use only the southern section and will never see a traffic light. North of there, there are some users who will exit before the first traffic light at Leewood Drive, but the majority won't.
ZLima12 (2021-03-28 18:58:38+00:00): That's a fair point. Perhaps the difference in quality between the bypass and the intersecting part could be made with the `expressway=yes` tag? That is, the bypass could be marked with that tag, which I believe is appropriate.
mdejean (2021-03-28 19:26:59+00:00): Yes, that and/or motorroad=yes.

Central Park Avenue is certainly the in-between sort of road where it has some grade separations, some areas with limited access/service roads, and some traffic lights. I could see a case for the entire road (to the Yonkers city line at least) being highway=trunk. I feel like that's kind of pushing it, though it does carry about the same amount of traffic as the highway=trunk section of the Bronx River Parkway.
ZLima12 (2021-03-28 19:55:31+00:00): Outside of this bypass, I think most of the road should be highway=primary, since it carries quite a bit of traffic, but also has many properties along it. It has a similar feel to many US highways, which are usually tagged as primary roads.
ZLima12 (2021-03-28 20:34:58+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101888914
mdejean (2021-03-28 20:45:11+00:00): Another possible idea might be to keep the bypass as highway=primary and downgrade the service roads to highway=secondary or highway=tertiary, like what happens on Grand Concourse: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191951871
ZLima12 (2021-03-28 20:53:56+00:00): That thought crossed my mind, though those two roads are the ones that continue to meet properties, similar to the rest of the road. It still may be the best approach though.
trouyer (2021-03-29 10:51:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Il semble qu'il y ai une erreur d'édition sur cette zone.

êtes vous sûr d'avoir voulu cartographier une autoroute ici ?
Furdrien (2021-03-29 12:06:47+00:00): Bonjour, 

Il s'agit bien d'une erreur de la part de Joyeux Bernard 

Il n'y a pas d'autoroute ici (ni même un projet d'autoroute)

Je me suis permis de corriger cette erreur.

OpenStreetMap n'est pas une carte imaginaire !
sannkc (2021-03-19 23:43:30+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM! When adding buildings, please remember to square the building before saving (right-click on the building and select Square or use the shortcut Q).  Also, please be sure to trace the building exactly as it appears in the imagery so as not to misrepresent the actual shape/location of the building.
Bert Araali (2021-03-25 12:01:12+00:00): Dear, you are editing to large areas to be managable. You should not edit alignments to better match arial imagery. It's the opposite. The aerial imagery must be alligned to exitsing features, especially when they are traced by local mappers who checked ground truth. Service roads to multiple houses are not be defintion wrong, often they go to larger private properties, even compounds which you could consider as separate villages, it's a wrong interpretation of the highway=service tag from your side. You should always contact the local mapper to decide if it is wrong or not. So please make changesets that only cover smaller geographical areas and stop realligning the map with your imagery.  Add what is missing but don't change without consensus with local OSM community.
ThreeOutOfFourCorners (2021-03-26 22:56:27+00:00): Thank you for the message Bert Araali. 

It appears one node was moved in Turkey while I was editing in Brazil. I will be sure to localize my future edits to smaller changesets. 

In regards to the service roads, I removed the driveway tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836778490 since driveways typically branch from main roads, and these roads act as the main through-roads for the complex. 

In regards to the alignment, I aligned the roads to Mapbox since both GPS traces and Strava align to this imagery. Thanks.
Bert Araali (2021-03-26 23:28:37+00:00): OK, I was commenting on possible changes in Uganda, as I couldn't find any there.  I'm a local and we recently face serious issues with imports. 
Service roads I can only agree with the approach, however service roads are interpreted slightly different across the world. In general, a service road can be any road or track not used for general public access. In most cases this means, as you stated that in most cases it branches from a main road or track. This way is in Brasil, so I leave it to the local community there to comment.  GPS and Strava are for sure reliable sources for alignment. Also there I made my comment in regard to possible changes in Uganda, where we are since recent making additions of calibration points and offsets in the offsets database. We noticed significant differences between tiles of satellite imagery, especially in mountainous areas and checked those on the ground. But as you say, GPS and Strava are for sure reliable alternative sources. Thank you for replying.
eggie (2021-03-20 07:58:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Futur3r (2021-03-19 22:16:09+00:00): Salut,

en France tu a seulement besoin des tags addr:street et addr:housenumber.

Je te conseil de rajouter les adresses sur des noeuds positionner au niveau de l'accès principal ou de la plaque dans la rue.

A+
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101356700
eggie (2021-03-19 22:08:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Het is niet gebruikelijk om trottoirs apatrt intekenen. Je kunt de tag ook opnemen in de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=left of tight of both.
Wanneer wegen elkaar kruisen maak dan een verbindingsnode, want anders routeert  het niet.


MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-03-19 22:14:16+00:00): typo.. dus 
sidewalk=right of left

Wanneer je echt op deze manier voetpaden wilt aanleggen dar zorgen voor verbindingen met andere wegen, want zo gaat het niet werken. 
Mapse,
eggie
jande75 (2021-03-29 20:43:44+00:00): Hallo,
schön, dass Sie Ihre Kanzlei bei OpenStreetMap eingetragen haben! Ich möchte jedoch darum bitten, die bei OpenStreetMap geltenden Konventionen zu beachten und gemischte Groß- und Kleinschreibung zu verwenden. Die Großschreibung RECHTWEBER LEGAL dient der Hervorhebung, und  es ist bei OpenStreetMap nicht erwünscht, dass einzelne Einträge gesondert hervorgehoben werden (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names). Dabei spielt es keine Rolle, dass dies die Eigenschreibweise des Unternehmens ist. Wie sich der Name in gemischter Groß-/Kleinschreibung schriebe, kann ich nicht beurteilen.
Beste Grüße aus Korschenbroich!
jande75
mariotomo (2021-03-20 22:10:41+00:00): hi. after opening the changeset, following the link to the edited object, and looking into its history, I see this is a useful and correct improvement to the data, but please do add changeset comments so people will know what you are doing and why. thank you for your contributions!
Something B (2021-03-20 22:30:27+00:00): OK, I will add comments in the future.
mariotomo (2021-09-19 22:19:32+00:00): Hi 'amymack', a hint on how to classify these roads that seem only used for agriculture … use the Strava low-res heat map! roads that are used for training and hiking and biking will show "hot".
sannkc (2021-03-19 23:25:25+00:00): Hello!  Please take a second look at the building that you added to the south of the Sheraton Hotel.  I don't see a second building in any of the imagery.  The Maxar imagery shows the south end of the hotel, from a skewed perspective due to the angle of the satellite imagery, but not a second building, as best as I can tell.
slgidley (2021-04-07 18:08:47+00:00): N2Y Railways Yard does not exist. This changeset is incorrect and should be reverted.
clay_c (2021-04-07 19:42:13+00:00): I have already reverted the fictional railway features. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102436763
woodpeck (2021-04-04 09:10:31+00:00): Hi, in this changeset you have added a number of golf holes with supplemental information like par and handicap. Could you explain the source of this information (and make it a habit to list such sources in the future when you upload data to OSM)? It is important to specify the source so that others can verify that data has not been copied from copyrighted sources.
eggie (2021-03-19 22:40:25+00:00): Beste Kimmy...   Els begin is moeilijk.
Wanneer wegen elkaar kruisen maak dan een verbinding op die plaats. Het zal toch moeten routerem in een routeplanner of gps.
Kijk even naar de foutmelding.. Maak een verbinding waar de weg het fietspad kruist. 
Je kunt anders niet afslaan. 
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-20 07:59:48+00:00): fixed crossing ways
mariotomo (2021-10-18 20:49:32+00:00): hola. gracias por pedir "review". mira, si te refieres al como mencionar el nombre de las calles, he intentado levantar la cuestión en el foro https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72599. cada contribución será útil para avanzar.
Nwalachosky18 (2021-10-19 17:30:13+00:00): Hola, estaba viendo que los nombre no estaban correctamente colocados.. me di de cuenta porque es mi comunidad y procedi a querer hacer ese cambio.
gracias!
mariotomo (2021-10-19 18:27:36+00:00): hola. y qué opinas de la forma en que expresar la numeración de las calles? sugiero utilizar como punto de referencia la organización en Bogotá. la publicación en el foro es para recoger opiniones. 
(como revisión pedida: aquí tienes dos name="Calle". seguramente querrás revisar los nombres a la izquierda (oeste) de la Avenida B, donde sigue "Camino Real" y falta la "Calle Tercera" / "Calle 3".)
mariotomo (2022-05-09 23:41:22+00:00): (me entero —tarde— que en este conjunto de cambios añadiste un fuel ahí donde estaba un fuel. probablemente no te enteraste.  o son dos fuel uno pegado al otro? sólo visitando se puede responder.)
BCNorwich (2021-03-23 08:18:27+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've made a few little mistakes here. The Way: Foot Tunnel (919434497) is placed on top of Way: 191509235 making a duplicated highway, they are joined together but tagged as differing layers. Both of these ways are then joined to the railway by a level crossing. A tunnel should not join to a feature above or below it, except at its endpoint. 

I've not corrected the problems so that you can see them. If you wish I can easily make corrections. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-03-25 09:51:40+00:00): Hi, no response so I've corrected the problems by removing duplicates and unjoin from railway line.

Regards Bernard.
Aikeshi (2021-03-25 22:13:38+00:00): Thanks Bernard,
It was trickier than I expected  perhaps an underground tunnel not the best option to attempt my 1st use of mapping -  happily you have fixed it.
willisturm (2021-08-22 16:19:05+00:00): Hallo bamheli.
Leider ist Dir beim Golfplatz Eugendorf ein kleiner Fehler unterlaufen. Bei einer Fläche golf=fairway sollte nicht landuse=grass dazugefügt werden. Steht auf der Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course in der Tabelle in der Zeile golf = fairway. Diesen Fehler habe ich früher auch gemacht.
Nichts für ungut und schöne Grüße
Willi
bamheli (2021-08-28 01:04:01+00:00): Hallo Willi!
Vorerst danke für Deinen Hinweis. Habe mir schon überlegt, ob ich auf openstreetmap noch mitarbeiten werde. Diese Änderung wurde mir so vorgeschlagen und ich habe sie durchgeführt. Ich bin kein Golfer!!!
Liebe Grüße Heli
Dave Venables (2021-03-21 09:17:10+00:00): Is the turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1714868 correct?

From Derby City Council
Brick Street

Revoke the left turn only for all vehicles from Brick Street to Friar Gate.

Prohibition of entry for motor vehicles from Ashbourne Road/Friar Gate.

Prohibition of left turn for motor vehicles from Brick Street to Friar Gate.

https://www.derby.gov.uk/transport-and-streets/roads-highways-pavements/traffic-regulation-orders/proposed-traffic-regulation-orders/brick-street-and-friar-gate/
Rovastar (2021-03-21 22:01:16+00:00): yeah i got the wrong one. I saw what was on the ground and that lane had been removed but it turns out that they removed that lane but reversed the direction of the other. I corrected all this a changeset aleady just after this one. here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101425251#map=18/52.92554/-1.49042 and the info I found best was in this pdf https://www.derby.gov.uk/media/derbycitycouncil/contentassets/documents/transport/tro/brickfriargate5.pdf
JayTurnr (2021-03-20 13:25:03+00:00): Analyse and update bus stops using NAPTAN data **
JayTurnr (2021-03-20 13:24:58+00:00): Analyse and update bus stops using NAPTAN data **
SomeoneElse (2021-04-02 11:22:46+00:00): Hello Rs76,
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it exists, not a fantasy map.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370326128 is clearly not a primary road.  Please don't make imaginary edits to OpenStreetMap; if you do we'll have to prevent you from making any edits at all.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-02 11:22:52+00:00): مرحبًا Rs76 ،
OpenStreetMap هي خريطة للعالم كما هي وليست خريطة خيالية. من الواضح أن https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370326128 ليس طريقًا رئيسيًا. من فضلك لا تقم بإجراء تعديلات وهمية على OpenStreetMap ؛ إذا قمت بذلك ، فسيتعين عليك منعك من إجراء أي تعديلات على الإطلاق.
أنا في حاجة إليها،
آندي تاونسند ، نيابة عن مجموعة عمل البيانات في OSM.
IlBano (2021-03-28 10:00:46+00:00): Ciao,

in questo changeset hai modificato 2 rotatorie (1 ottenuta da survey con GPS) e un incrocio riallineandole a imagery Maxar Premium e senza avere applicato nessun offest di correzione. Il risultato è che tutto ciò che sta attorno è coerente con ESRI World Imagery e le tue modifiche sono sfasate.

Per evitare problemi ti propongo un revert del tuo changeset che posso eseguire io con JOSM.

Grazie

IlBano
user_10654882 (2021-03-20 08:22:14+00:00): MTB FORIS has deleted a valid image with EXIF data. He has long since lost his credibility by lying that my photos are not valid and that I am directed against their work.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-20 18:43:20+00:00): @MTB FORIS Are you sure that http://mtb.4is.info/mtb-city-road/1.jpg is actually a photograph of this stretch of path?  Your photo shows a Y-junction, but there is clearly no such junction here.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-20 18:45:21+00:00): @MTB FORIS Thank you for fixing the invalid foot and bicycle tags that @sava eskimo added in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101340185 though!
user_10654882 (2021-03-20 20:54:03+00:00): Return the photo that I was so that potential passers-by would have information about the route.
I will always record the route with valid software so that it will be clear what it is about. Until then, let it be that you are right;)
Best regards
MTB Evolution
JeroenvanderGun (2021-03-19 23:56:14+00:00): For example, the Dutch cities Zoetermeer, Barendrecht, Hilversum, and Apeldoorn also have an unnumbered ring road with the same icon on road signs, which is tagged the same on OSM.
skquinn (2021-04-05 01:43:23+00:00): Hi,

What exactly is "f" supposed to mean as a changeset comment?
PolyDunami (2021-03-20 00:30:46+00:00): There are a couple of things to note in this changeset. One, the park added at 79 Avenue appears to conflict with the housing properties in the area. Further investigation could prove helpful.
PolyDunami (2021-03-20 00:34:38+00:00): Secondly, the map of this city features data added in on a mass scale. The ones in this area were offset and there were a few houses that had been merged together. This part of the map could use a big tasking project.