piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
geow (2021-12-15 19:49:11+00:00): Hi ATS_Alpenregion, du hast hier auf Wirtschaftswegen (track) bicycle=no ergänzt. Nach deinem CS-Kommentar ist Radfahren abseits der Wege verboten, was sich ja ohnehin von selbst versteht. Ergibt sich das auf den Wegen wirklich aus der LSG-Verordnung?  Falls nein, würden wir uns freuen, wenn du die Verbote wieder entfernen würdest.

Danke, geow

PS: Eine explizite Möglichkeit verordnete Wege_ge_bote in Schutzgebieten zu kartieren wäre access:offroad=no am LSG-Polygon, mehr dazu hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:protection_title#Sonderfl.C3.A4chen
geow (2021-12-15 21:06:27+00:00): ...und hier noch eine Karte, die Verbote/Gebote in Wald-Wild-Schongebieten darstellt: 
https://www.xctrails.org/schongebiete/SchongebieteWMSLayer.html
tux67 (2020-11-12 16:51:49+00:00): Hallo Doktor_D,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Du hattest ein Review requested. Im Vertrauen darauf, daß du da Ortskenntnis hast wäre es nur wichtig, daß du beim Erfassen deiner Daten auch eine Quelle angibst (Nicht sicher wie/wo man das bei OsmHydrant macht.)
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94005180
solenoid jam (2020-11-18 13:45:59+00:00): По поводу трамвайных рельс. Летом по этому участку временно пускали трамвай №13. Сейчастам вообще ничего не ходит?
maferikotupi (2020-11-27 22:31:27+00:00): Bonjour... Merci de bien regarder votre écran avant de valider une modification ; vous avez "explosé" les allées du jardin du  Mail à Angers...
itchybellybutton (2020-11-13 10:40:14+00:00): Hi, why did you add "natural=tree" to a platform? 
I reversed that, because it doesn't make sense. If there is a tree there, you can map it as a separate point.
Vinec (2020-11-20 16:28:59+00:00): Hallo Redweizn,
Der Fahrradweg ist meines Wissens nicht benutzungspflichtig, und daher ist das Fahrradfahren auf der Straße erlaubt.
Viele Grüße
mavl (2020-11-12 16:44:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 93479552, 93613002.
bxl-forever (2020-12-22 01:27:05+00:00): Hello,
I think your changeset is incorrect.
We are currently reviewing maxspeed in Brussels and updating data.  Contrary to popular belief, not 100% of streets will become 30-kph streets: Boulevard Maria Groeninckx-De Maylaan is one of the streets that will keep a 50-kph speed regime.  New C43 roadsigns saying "50" are being installed along those roads.
I will revert your changes.
Olivier Collet (2020-12-22 10:00:14+00:00): Hello,
This has nothing to do with future changes to speed limits. I know several sections of road that have been shown on the new map to be "50" but contain short sections of "30" (near schools mostly). Regarding this place, I checked the current situation myself (and was fined because of it) and this speed limit of 30 km/h is permanently in place on this short section of the boulevard. Please do not revert it unless you have better local and actual knowledge. Thank you.
!bm (2020-11-12 16:19:50+00:00): source=* natürlich nicht wie angegeben, sondern =Geoportal Berlin / Digitale farbige Orthophotos 2019 (DOP20RGB); Geoportal Berlin / Digitale farbige Orthophotos 2018 (DOP20RGB); Geoportal Berlin / ALKIS Berlin - Gebäude; Geoportal Berlin / Berlin Zoom; Geoportal Berlin / Adressen Berlin
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94007021
Le Ruthénois (2021-01-19 17:40:51+00:00): Le profil de ce chemin n'est pas celui d'une voie romaine ! ce chemin de la châtaigneraie serait donc nommé voie Romaine à tord.
naveenpf (2020-11-15 15:10:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94008104
Minh Nguyen (2020-11-12 16:46:30+00:00): https://transportation.ky.gov/DistrictSix/Pages/Brent-Spence-Bridge-Update.aspx tracks reopening for both the bridge and the river.
joost schouppe (2021-07-06 10:53:50+00:00): Aan het westelijk einde van deze weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/870858216#map=18/50.72997/4.41421 is op Mapillary duidelijk te zien dat er een gesloten poort is en dat het een private oprit betreft. Aan het andere uiteinde heb je een fietsbarriere gezet https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8112268973#map=19/50.72979/4.41949 , maar dat lijkt me sterk - hier is wellicht eerder een volwaardige poort waar niemand door mag. Er zijn ook helemaal geen gebruikssporen op Strava. Ik heb dus alle wegen in dit gebied op privaat gezet.
joost schouppe (2021-07-06 11:00:11+00:00): Correctie, er is wel enig gebruik zichtbaar op Strava
mavl (2020-11-12 17:54:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 92185402, 92783638, 92843714, 93008784, 93436639.
naveenpf (2020-11-15 15:10:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94008704
5m4u9 (2020-11-12 19:02:45+00:00): hola brenda, las ediciones que hiciste debes tratar de no pegar las areas de cultivo a las calles, siempre separado. en los edificios deben tratar de no inventar areas y separar, las casas por lo general son areas pequeñas, casi nunca son grandes areas. gracias por mapear!
adlid (2020-11-16 00:28:37+00:00): Hi. The updated Bing imagery has an offset from the existing mapped data. If you find yourself making bulk shifts of data, it's often an offset in the underlay imagery rather than bad data in OSM. The offset should be calibrated in iD with a known-good location prior to making edits. Thanks!
Marting77 (2020-11-16 08:41:59+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I have generally been comparing 3 data-sets: aerial imagery, strava heatmaps and local council planning maps. Where I find a correlation of these telling the same story about anomolous geometry I make a change. However, one group of changes often has a knock-on affect to connected features. I'm not going to do so many changes in future - perhaps just adding detail in
adlid (2020-11-16 10:55:38+00:00): I don't intend to disuade you from editing; I had the exact same situation before I learned about the offset :)
It may well be that you have the data to prove the existing data is misaligned.
vasony (2021-05-05 12:47:30+00:00): Szia!

Pontosan mi volt a polgármesteri javaslat, egységes lett a 2 településen ennek az utcának a neve? Elérhető ez a javaslat valahol a neten?
Keresem a Kőröshegyi utat, de azt látom, hogy át lett nevezve és a Közút címe is Szántódi utca lett.

Köszi, Tamás
map per (2020-12-02 07:46:29+00:00): Hallo redweizn,

sie haben den Radweg an der Einfahrt zur Großmarkthalle auf bicycle=no gesetzt. Da das nicht stimmt wollte ich mal nachfragen was "Routingverbesserung" bedeuten soll. Das heißt doch nicht etwa, dass absichtlich fasche Sachen eingezeichnet werden oder?

In OSM sollten auf keinen Fall falsche Sachen eingetragen werden, nur um ein bestimmtes Verhalten eines spezifischen Kartenprogramms zu erzwingen. 
(Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer )

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2020-12-02 07:54:55+00:00): PS: Ich würde mich sehr über eine Antwort freuen
redweizn (2020-12-02 08:06:43+00:00): Hallo map per. Keineswegs, ich bin hier in den Seiten neu und habe die Änderungen nach besten Wissen gemacht. Bei zukünftigen Änderungen werd ich dann von der Situation ein Foto machen. Danke für Ihr Feedback. Beste Grüße
map per (2020-12-02 08:40:06+00:00): Dann ist ja alles bestens.
Viele Grüße und danke für die schnelle Antwort
map per
Goffredo (2020-11-13 10:29:24+00:00): Ciao :-)
Credo tu abbia inavvertitamente cancellato dei contorni di alcune relazioni che definivano i boschi e le aree agricole. Te la senti di risistemare? :-)
Lilusbel (2020-11-13 14:43:09+00:00): Ciao, in effetti credo di avere fatto una grandissima stupidaggine. Purtroppo non credo di essere in grado di rimediare, ho provato ad annullare le modifiche ma non ne sono stato capace...
Goffredo (2020-11-13 15:52:24+00:00): Tranquillo, hanno già rimediato e ricostruito il poligono. Buon mapping.
Lilusbel (2020-11-14 16:05:11+00:00): Grazie mille... cercherò di stare mooolto piu attento...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-11-12 18:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94012415 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4181 for more details.
5m4u9 (2020-11-12 19:08:16+00:00): hola, muchos de los edificios adicionandos son inventados, son areas de terrenos, son areas que unen varias propiedades haciendo un mapa son calidad, estoy revertiendo estos cambios y corrigiendo en lo posible.
eggie (2020-11-12 18:03:13+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk.. 
Kijk even hier wat je hebt gedaan
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94009574

Eerst het westelijke highway=path 
Dat is de tagging voor een paadje.. ongeschikt voor voertuigen met vier wielen. 
access=yes overruled je andere restricties.. Dus die regel verwijderen.
Dan krijg je tags die elkaar tegenspreken.
motor_vehicle is al auto / motorfiets, maar in osm ook mofa en moped.
Die staan op no..
Daarnaast tag je motorcycle en motorcar=yes? Dat is een contradictio interminus. 
Daar komt de router niet uit. :)
Dan het oostelijke pad heb je access=no verwijderd. dat is oke. Wanneer daar geen voertuigen gewenst zijn..  bv alles met wielen..
Dan tag je vehicle=no.
Welke borden staan vooraan?
Up to you!
eggie
eggie (2020-11-12 18:08:06+00:00): Dus wat staat op dit bord dat ik in 'straatkijk' zie?

Wanneer je er niet mag fietsen dus vehicle=no
foot=yes
Friendly_Ghost (2020-11-12 21:51:42+00:00): Greetings! For your next changesets, could you please add a more descriptive comment? Could you also keep your changesets a bit more local, because this is showing up in the changeset history of everyone editing within this large area.
IpswichMapper (2020-11-15 21:37:59+00:00): Tip: Don't use the "history" tab on osm.org to see changesets in your area.

Instead, log into osmCHA, set the bounding box to your local area and set "Bbox size bound" to either 2 or 1
ZZ29 (2021-01-03 14:48:24+00:00): Bonjour,
S'agit-il d'armoires fibres ici aussi?
Bonne journée
Pa413 (2021-01-03 14:55:29+00:00): Bonjour,

oui également 

Bonne journée
5m4u9 (2020-11-13 05:39:32+00:00): ya en el mapa
alenalola (2020-11-12 18:06:44+00:00): I added points representing some local places, like a coffee shop, a supermarket, a private kindergarten. Moreover, I've updated details on one supermarket that was opened instead of a closed cafe, and I changed a tag for the building which construction has been completed
BCNorwich (2020-11-12 19:48:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
If you've verified on the ground that this now officially a cycleway then the tag proposed:highway=cycleway can be removed.

Regards Bernard.
grene1 (2020-11-12 20:41:15+00:00): Thanks for the advice Bernard, this was my first OSM change. I've deleted the proposed tag.
Frans S (2020-12-04 15:22:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please be more precise in your mapping and square the buildings with the q key.
alesarrett (2020-11-13 08:06:32+00:00): Buongiorno Kapoz. Ti segnalo che, in Italia, gli indirizzi andrebbero assegnati come punti lì dove esiste la targhetta di segnalazione dell'indirizzo. Poi si possono assegnare anche a varie attività (negozi, studi, ...) ma lo si fa sui POI (Punti di Interesse) puntuali, non sugli edifici. Riusciresti a correggere il tuo edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94012067
eggie (2020-11-12 18:54:01+00:00): Lijkt mij oke zo
eggie
eggie (2020-11-12 18:55:39+00:00): Die ontbrekende verbindingsnode heb je al opgelost zie ik.
Roelieboelie (2020-11-12 19:30:03+00:00): Top! Ja zat niet helemaal lekker die missende verbinding, inmiddels rechtgezet en aangepast conform werkelijkheid.
Frans S (2020-12-05 15:23:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. Please square the buildings you map and be more accurate.
Your mappings are rather oversized.
Best regards and keep mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-11-12 18:18:01+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 94009444, 94009545.
Frans S (2020-11-27 16:14:28+00:00): Hello. See my PM about mapping
you did not square a lot of buildings here
Please solve also the issues shown on the issue triangle before uploading
Best regards and keep mapping
Atakua (2020-11-12 18:52:37+00:00): Hej! Tack för ditt bidrag, det ser bättre ut nu för skogspartiet.
eggie (2020-11-12 19:01:19+00:00): Niks mis mee..
Roelieboelie (2020-11-12 20:32:02+00:00): Top
mariotomo (2020-11-16 13:53:49+00:00): hola.  como principiante, te pusiste en una zona bastante complicada!  si tienes interés en OSM, te sugiero entrar en contacto con la comunidad, tenemos mucho que hacer en Panamá, y sí, también las barriadas de invasión, pero no es algo que se soluciona con una edición así sin más comentario ni coordinación …
eggie (2020-11-12 19:05:50+00:00): Je kunt als je upload aangeven : vinkje zetten.. bij automatische bron van huidige lagen .. zodat andere mappers kunnen zien welke achtergrondlagen je actief hebt staan.
eggie (2020-11-12 19:07:24+00:00): Zie bv mijn laatste bijdrage
De source is nu ingevuld. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94014411#map=19/51.53607/5.96104
Roelieboelie (2020-11-12 19:29:04+00:00): Ik zie het! Gaan we proberen bij een volgende bijdrage!
wireguy (2020-11-12 19:06:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM Bzagam!
Thanks for adding the pois, that's great info for NJ.
Some issues though.  
You accidently dragged nodes connecting River street and the beach parking.  Can you correct that?
Someone else dragged nodes on Ocean ave, just south of your changes near a bank (?).

Also, for website addresses, add the https:// in front of the url.
Phone numbers should follow the conventions explained in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone

Ping me if you have any questions.  Keep mapping!
wilczywilk (2020-11-12 19:13:51+00:00): możesz cofnąć swoje zmiany? Spóźniłem się kilka sekund a zrobiłem lepsza poprawkę włącznie z aktualizacją węzła wg najnowszego projektu
wilczywilk (2020-11-12 19:30:51+00:00): nieważne, już cofnąłem
Atakua (2020-11-12 18:50:39+00:00): Hej! Bra jobbat!
ralley (2020-11-12 23:46:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit.  There is no need to add a POI for the Fresh Choice supermarket here as it has been on the map for ~5 years, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3436746945  Also in OSM the convention is not to put the location ("Mangere Bridge") in the name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Names&uselang=en#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94014310
eggie (2020-11-12 19:49:05+00:00): Edwin.. het is een kwestie van volhouden.. :)

'ter leering ende vermaeck'
Dus 
highway=path
vehicle=no (als je er niet mag fietsen
foot=yes
surface=unpaved

De rest kan weg
access=no  betekent Verboden toegang voor iedereen.. weg ermee dus
motorvehicle / motorcycle /motorcar gewoon weghalen die regels

Kies voor alle tags zichtbaar.. dan
kun je regels verwijderen
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94014813

Dus nog even aan de slag.. OSM lijkt simpel, maar is verre van dat. Vooral de accesstags
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Succes,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-12 20:12:42+00:00): Ik denk dat editor iD er vanzelf =no van maakt als je =yes verwijdert.. Wellicht om het je makkelijk te maken, maar met ongewenst resultaat :)
eagleeye666666 (2020-11-13 11:43:50+00:00): ui duzo zmian. dobra robota!
Frans S (2020-11-16 14:11:28+00:00): Hello
You retagged a riverbank into a building=yes
By accident?
I changed it back to riverbank.ss
vhoff (2020-11-13 12:54:22+00:00): Hi AWFCloin,

thank you very much for all the rivers you've mapped in Kenya.

May I ask, what this "2572" means you always use?

Best wishes
mavl (2020-11-13 15:05:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок меняет статус транзитной дороги с highway=tertiary на highway=residential, что нарушает связность дорожного графа.  
Также после этого пакета правок улица Карла Маркса стала выходить за пределы населённого пункта и иметь длину более 10 км. Это явная ошибка.  
Этот пакет правок частично отменён.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754605124/history  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification
eggie (2020-11-12 20:22:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-11-12 20:19:40+00:00): Om te voorkomen dat heel Venray vol met P's (parkeerterreinen)  komt te staan kun je het beste alleen bij echte parkeerterreinen amenity=parking gebruiken. De parkeerhaven langs de straten zijn geen parkeerterreinen.
Dus beter weghalen.
Wel kun je aangeven met parkin:lane:left / right = (bv) perpendicular..  dat je haaks of =parallel parkeert langs weg
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
Zou dus nog even naar die parkeervakken kijken of ze aan amenity=parking voldoen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking

gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-12 20:20:25+00:00): typo parking:lane:left/  right / both enz
eggie (2020-11-12 20:21:13+00:00): Die tagging staat dan in de hoofdrijbaan.. renderen doet het niet op de standaardkaart, maar er zijn wel kaarten die het laten zien.
Roelieboelie (2020-11-12 20:22:31+00:00): Ok thnx. zal even bekijken.
Ars-UA (2020-11-12 20:06:44+00:00): В реальности тут только деревья, нет ни дорожек, ни лавочек.
Ars-UA (2020-11-12 20:09:16+00:00): Тут нельзя отдохнуть, тут просто сосны. Обсудил на форуме, сошлись, что на парк не тянет.
Salvuzzo_60 (2020-11-12 20:41:28+00:00): Non mi sono accorto di aver inserito involontariamente il percorso 870912119, v1 come posso cancellarlo? Grazie
Salvuzzo_60 (2020-11-13 08:40:58+00:00): Risolto
NonnEmilia (2020-11-13 06:45:47+00:00): Ciao Marty5550, scusami, ma ho dovuto ripristinare questa modifica per due motivi: 1. erano stati cancellati i tag `wikipedia` e `wikidata`, fondamentali per tutta una serie di servizi che usano OSM 2. il nome della città è quello con "nell'". Il nome alternativo più corto e in uso fino a qualche decina di anni fa (quando il comune ha avviato una campagna volta a ufficializzare il nome esteso) è già presente nel tag apposito `alt_name`.

Grazie e buon mapping!
user_10901495 (2020-11-13 09:24:46+00:00): Buongiorno NonnEmilia. Per quanto riguarda il primo punto, è vero, mi sono dimenticato di rimettere i tag corrispondenti alla città dopo averli tolti per poter cambiare il nome.
Per quanto riguarda invece il nome della città, mi dispiace, ma non ha nessuna rilevanza il fatto che 10 anni fa sia stata fatta una campagna per rendere ufficiale il nome precedente, l'unica cosa rilevante è se questo nome è effettivamente diventato ufficiale dopo la campagna. E non vuol dire nulla dirmi che il nome più corretto è già presente nei nomi alternativi, io ho cambiato il nome proprio perché il nome principale, quello che un utente vede nella mappa, era sbagliato. Provi a guardare come viene indicato in tutti gli indirizzi locali, nella bandiera comunale o come viene descritto nella prima riga della pagina wikipedia il nome che caldeggia lei.
Nel linguaggio corrente (e quello ufficiale) la preposizione prima di Emilia è stata quasi abbandonata.

Grazie per il feedback e buon mapping anche a lei!
NonnEmilia (2020-11-15 09:04:01+00:00): Buongiorno Marty5550, il nome ufficiale è sempre stato quello con la preposizione (come da statuto comunale https://www.comune.re.it/retecivica/urp/regolamenti.nsf/PESDocumentID/7647BF8C7A086544C125688200568FDF?opendocument&FROM=Sttt), quello più comune è sempre stato quello senza preposizione (analogamente a quanto accade per "Reggio di Calabria") e noi in città diciamo semplicemente "Reggio".
La campagna di cui parlavo è stata fatta per uniformare questa situazione plurale: ora nello stemma comunale e nelle comunicazioni ufficiali (e nelle statistiche ISTAT) infatti appare "Reggio nell'Emilia", ma nulla vieta di usare il nome abbreviato (e infatti anche il comune stesso lo fa).
Su Wikipedia purtroppo il cambio è stato fatto arbitrariamente tempo fa e senza una discussione adeguata (come notato anche nella pagina di discussione: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussione:Reggio_Emilia#Spostamento_a_Reggio_Emilia).

Riassumendo secondo me è corretto lasciare in name "Reggio nell'Emilia", nel caso di ricerca di "Reggio Emilia" viene preso il nome dentro alt_name e quindi le ricerche non vanno a vuoto.
Si potrebbe mettere short_name "Reggio" oppure mettere in short_name "Reggio Emilia" e in loc_name "Reggio"...
sorcrosc (2020-11-15 16:15:33+00:00): Come nome principale penso che "Reggio Emilia" ci può stare ma i nomi alternativi vanno messi. Io farei:
official_name=Reggio nell'Emilia
short_name=Reggio Emilia
loc_name=Reggio

Ciao
Lorenzo
NonnEmilia (2020-11-16 07:58:48+00:00): Ciao Lorenzo,
visto che c'è interesse sulla cosa e che si tratta di un capoluogo di provincia (e quindi di interesse un po' più generale) ho aperto una discussione sulla lista talk-it: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2020-November/071088.html

Ciao
Lorenzo (anch'io :)
Mazda05 (2020-11-13 07:29:03+00:00): Приветствую, у вас есть сведения о переименовании данного объекта или аннулировании его наименования?
Ars-UA (2020-11-13 09:04:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Конечно, декоммунизация же. Ленин ушёл и забрал с собой свой ленинский комсомол.
Mazda05 (2020-11-13 10:10:16+00:00): Не нужно выдавать желаемое за действительное. В решениях о переименовании этого объекта, на текущий момент, нет
Mazda05 (2020-11-13 07:28:41+00:00): Приветствую, у вас есть сведения о переименовании данного объекта или аннулировании его наименования?
Ars-UA (2020-11-13 09:15:33+00:00): Ответил тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94017065
Mazda05 (2020-11-13 10:10:20+00:00): Не нужно выдавать желаемое за действительное. В решениях о переименовании этого объекта, на текущий момент, нет
GinaroZ (2020-11-14 12:04:43+00:00): Hi, generally we don't add the name of walking routes to individual paths - instead we use a relation like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1756633#map=13/55.8858/-5.1258

Does the West Island Way route go inland here rather than following the A886?
jonsear (2020-11-14 12:57:38+00:00): Thanks for letting me know.  I'm not familiar with "relations" yet but very happy for you to amend.  Yes the WIW initially followed the road but has been rerouted inland now the new path has been created.
GinaroZ (2020-11-14 17:16:09+00:00): Basically in this case relations are made up of the paths/roads of the walking route.

As you can see from the orange line I've rerouted the WIW to follow the inland route, thanks: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1756633#map=13/55.8749/-5.1205
Friendly_Ghost (2020-11-12 21:49:09+00:00): natural=scrub is hier incorrect, omdat het om onderhouden struiken gaat en niet om een gebied met struiken in de vrije natuur. Zelf ben ik er meer voor om hier leisure=garden te gebruiken.