piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2022-03-01 16:47:27+00:00): Hallo! Bitte habe eine Blick auf http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032544223 (als Beispiel). Was ist die Bedeutung des Schlüssel UN_Number?
plennert (2022-03-01 18:18:04+00:00): damit wird/habe ich die untere Zeile einer Gefahrguttafel getaggt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Gefahrguttafel_30_1202_IMG_1980.jpg
Diese ist auch als Stoffnummer/Kemlerzahl bekannt.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 18:47:47+00:00): Ich sehe gerade, dass Du auch das Wiki entsprechend angepasst hast. Ich bin mir weder beim Underscore (hazmat_danger siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hazmat, dort werden die Gefahrenklassen mit : abgetrennt) noch gefällt mir persönlich das notwendige Fachwissen, um den Zusammenhang zwischen hazmat_danger und UN_Number zu erkennen. Wäre nicht sowas wie hazmat:x:detail =<UN_Number value> sinnvoller? Diskussionen zum Tagging kann ich im Wiki nicht erkennen...
plennert (2022-03-02 12:09:02+00:00): Hallo user_5359,
das Wiki habe ich nicht angepasst. Das hazmat bildet die Gefahrstoffklasse ab. Das hazard_danger bildet die Gefahrnummer ab. D. h. die Gefahr die aus der Stoffklasse hervorgeht.
Das UN_Number soll die eindeutige Stoffnummer abbilden.
frydzio (2022-02-28 21:32:00+00:00): Jeśli trafo jest na słupie to warto skorzystać z takiej kombinacji tagów: power=pole | transformer=distribution (szablon "Słup z transformatorem" w JOSM)
charl3s (2022-02-28 21:34:23+00:00): Wiem, tu było dawno temu dodane.
frydzio (2022-03-01 05:45:03+00:00): Na węzłach widzę tylko power=transformer a nie kombinację z mojej propozycji :)
charl3s (2022-03-01 18:05:39+00:00): no tu nie ma, bo to dawne edycje, nawet nie patrzyłem na to
nlehuby (2022-03-03 10:31:39+00:00): 
Hi,

I think the 65 stops were mistakenly moved. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117950486
nlehuby (2022-03-03 10:34:28+00:00): I did manually revert the positions of all bus stops in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118050524
nlehuby (2022-03-04 17:25:07+00:00): new manual fix changeset (I did revert to last position, not to the position before this changeset) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118101901
Leo Slager (2023-10-05 16:58:45+00:00): Hi wvdp,
Met deze changeset heb je de naam Munitiecomplex Norg toegevoegd.
wat ik mij afvraag is uit welke bron die naam afkomstig is.
Bij het Ministerie van Defensie is de naam MMC Veenhuizen al in gebruik sinds de bouw werd opgeleverd.
voluit: MunitieMagazijnenComplex Veenhuizen.
Kan de naam gewijzigd worden ?
wvdp (2023-10-06 20:15:22+00:00): ik kan mij deze edit niet activef herinneren maar op wikipedia staat deze naam vernoemd zonder bron.

zelf ben ik van bron gewisseld en noemd de wet die hier over gaat het ook munitieopslagplaats MMC Veenhuizen.

dus ik denk dat aan gebrek aan een beter bron de naam veranderd mag worden.

https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3:c:BWBR0031018&bijlage=12.25&z=2021-07-01&g=2021-07-01
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 18:39:20+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4205652 ?
felipeeugenio (2022-02-28 19:07:58+00:00): Hola. por favor cuando se cambien los nombres oficiales el MOP a nombres por las que son conocidas las rutas (lo que está perfecto), dejar el nombre oficial en official_name.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117950868
czecko (2022-02-28 17:51:44+00:00): Cześć, a nie jest czasem w innym miejscu? W linku który podałeś podany jest nr 60.
gogeo (2022-02-28 18:02:22+00:00): tak sprawdzałem to i wyszło mi, że są dwa

https://www.gdziepolek.pl/apteki/w-jasliskach/9020/apteka-jasliska-2

https://mapa.targeo.pl/apteka-60-38-485-jasliska~20790525/apteka/adres

Jak przerobię cały zestaw to będę to sprawdzał.
gogeo (2022-03-01 18:50:00+00:00): Dzięki - poprawione na 60.
Quainer (2022-03-03 15:13:31+00:00): pastureland is meant to be tagged as meadow
Quainer (2022-03-03 15:20:40+00:00): According to OSM wiki the farmland tag should only be used for tillage crops
LateNightTone (2022-03-03 15:43:09+00:00): Hi Quainer, thanks for bringing this to my attention - looks like the OSM wiki on farmland and medow has been updated since I last saw it - probably a number of years ago. (Previously farmland was described as both crop and pasture land, and meadow as wild meadow without mention of animal grazing.) My bad! I'll have to update the various places I've tagged over the past few years as well then.... 😟
Quainer (2022-03-03 16:28:12+00:00): No bother sure just letting you know👍, Ireland will be a little bit greener!
LateNightTone (2022-03-03 19:15:46+00:00): Indeed! Bit of a shame that OSM.org doesn't render the edges of meadow like it does for farmland though - it's quite pleasing to see the boundaries after completing an area.
eggie (2022-02-28 17:04:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.  .. In beide wegstukken heb ik de spelfouten in de straatnaam verbeterd.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117951055

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-28 17:06:02+00:00): Zou adresnode Groeneweg 30a  nog bestaan?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-28 17:08:07+00:00): Historisch adres 30a verwijderd
Matthijs Danz (2022-03-01 20:52:40+00:00): Volgens mij is gebouw Groeneweg 30A veranderd in appartementen Raoul Wallenbergplantsoen 1, 2 en 3.
eggie (2022-03-01 21:18:14+00:00): Klopt... 'k Had even het Kadaster geraadpleegd en die geeft dat ook aan.
Vandaar de aanpassing.
Mvg
Eggie
KoiAndBlueBird (2022-02-28 16:47:07+00:00): Sorry, falscher comment: Unsinniger Wert für "Überdacht" entfernt
mariotomo (2022-08-01 14:55:50+00:00): hi. thank you.
user_2066394 (2022-03-01 13:09:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114538331
Da hat es jetzt die ursprpüngliche Grundstückszufahrt nach oben neben den Radweg verzogen. Unten fehlt sie.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/30484897
Hier hast du noexit=yes mit amenity=waste_basket ergänzt, der Mülleimer liegt vermutlich woanders?

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9485685502
Der Mülleimer wurde Anfang Februar neu eingetragen, ist der tatsächlich weg?
user_5359 (2022-03-01 09:56:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use for the keys explicitly British English. For more details have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 16:41:02+00:00): revert, mostly foreign keys
Nearby0051 (2022-05-31 18:41:46+00:00): Hi,
rein aus Interesse, was ist denn groundhandling? Ich habe in Taginfo nichts finden können und ein anderer user scheint es entfernt zu haben
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119808871)

Beste Grüße
Krunch_ (2022-06-03 13:20:31+00:00): The tag is mentioned here so I don't know why it was removed: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=free%20flying?uselang=en-GB#Defining_the_practice_sites

You can find more information about ground handling here for example: https://flybubble.com/blog/improve-your-ground-handling
Nearby0051 (2022-06-03 13:59:49+00:00): Thank you for your reply!
I assumed you speak German, sorry for that

I suggest you add the tag back since it seems to be useful as well as documented. Maybe leave a comment in the changeset that removed the tagging and link back to this exchange?

Cheers
Krunch_ (2022-06-03 14:35:40+00:00): Done. Thanks.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 23:03:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166882.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-28 21:53:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117951927
Warin61 (2022-02-28 23:03:46+00:00): Hi,
The State Library has an 'underground' connection across to the Mitchell too. I also suspect there is a connection to State Parliament. 

Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.21293&lat=-33.86641&zoom=18

A site relation maybe better. 

The DCS Imagery looks better than bing .. and I have found it to be better for location too. 

As a user of both libraries ... The Mitchell is where you go for the older Mitchell historic stuff.  This has a separate request/collection area. If you request it in the other building you'll be directed to the Mitchell for collection. Additionally there is a more select area for the oldest stuff with more eyes on you. The building is named the "Michell Library' and can be seen over the front entrance, operated by the state library.
okwithmydecay (2022-03-01 17:28:20+00:00): Thank you for the detailed explanation, and happy to defer to you as how the relationship is best modelled.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 15:47:41+00:00): revert, mostly foreign keys!
praeteritum (2022-07-03 23:02:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166848.
Hohe Schule (2022-02-28 17:56:44+00:00): "mise à jour" is very generic: May you please try out more elaborate changeset comments?
praeteritum (2022-07-03 23:00:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166828.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:58:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166813.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 16:13:31+00:00): revert, mostly foreign keys
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-03 02:44:00+00:00): Good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117953009
b-jazz (2022-03-04 06:21:18+00:00): Thanks! The work on Phase I continues and will take at least a month by my estimates. But I’ve got the workflow smoothed out so the change files are generated automatically. It’s the manual verification that is the big effort now.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:55:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166758.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166784.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:58:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166799.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-07 04:43:57+00:00): تم عكس هذه التعديلات التخريبية والتخريب مهما كان كبيراً بالامكان عكسه:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118181323
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118181316
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-07 04:51:52+00:00): هذه مجموعة صور من أحد السكان المحليين:
اسم القرية حسب اللافتات الموجودة فيها ويظهر اسم "المجيصة" وليس أولاد مرزوق! :
https://imgur.com/a/8Lh19KQ
، اسم القرية على عامود في بداية القرية:
https://imgur.com/elgU9RL
، اسم مدرسة سعيد ابن المسيب في المجيصة (يظهر اسم القرية والمدرسة!):
https://imgur.com/q7Sdayg
،اسم مدرسة ابتدائية ومتوسطة المجيصة:
https://imgur.com/TRoc1SP
ويظهر فيها اسم القرية واسم المدرسة 
لذا نرجوا عدم التخريب واحترام أن هذه الخريطة خريطة عامة يستخدمها الناس وينتفعون منها في شؤون حياتهم وليست ملكاً شخصياً لكم!
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:53:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166743.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:52:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166739.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:52:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166722.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:50:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166703.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 09:55:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9545577220. What is the meaning of the tags
    JPT_KOD_JE = 1802
    JPT_NAZWA_ = powiat brzozowski
    _uid_ = 545
    adres = ks. Józefa Bielawskiego 18
    id = 291
    kod = 36-200
    miasto = Brzozów
    miejscowosc = Brzozów
    nazwa = SZPITAL SPECJALISTYCZNY W BRZOZOWIE PODKARPACKI OŚRODEK ONKOLOGICZNY IM.KS.B.MARKIEWICZA
    powiat = brzozowski
    poziom = Szpital onkologiczny lub pulmonologiczny
    telefon = (013)430 95 52
    wojewodztwo = podkarpackie
    www = http://szpital-brzozow.pl
blindgoblin (2022-02-28 18:10:26+00:00): Note changes per book 2544 pg 713
user_5359 (2022-02-28 18:48:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Why did you delete the key highway? Your comment is "This bridge is private": This is the meaning of  the tag access=private. The second part of the comment says "No vehicular, pedestrian, equestrian or bicycle access whatsoever are allowed." This is normally written with the tag access=no. But the path on the bridge exists.
blindgoblin (2022-02-28 18:59:36+00:00): my apologies if i did that incorrectly.  I am just trying to fix an issue where navigations system direct people over my bridge. LMK what i need to fix and glad to do it.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 06:55:55+00:00): Only one of the routing machines (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=40.58041%2C-74.96008%3B40.58015%2C-74.95914#map=19/40.58028/-74.95961) leads across the bridge (please remember that the data is not immediately taken over). Here, an access =no would be appropriate. I can gladly make the necessary changes for you.
blindgoblin (2022-03-01 11:56:29+00:00): That would be great!  I appreciate your help on this.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 18:11:56+00:00): Done!
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:48:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166668.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166654.
Udarian (2022-02-28 18:26:46+00:00): forgot to add this in the message but there work still needed in the area
VictorIE (2022-03-29 12:51:39+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9545643702 (and a few others)

ESB don't operate street lights. Mostly it will be the council, but in 14 council areas is is Enerveo: https://enerveo.com/report-a-fault/republic-of-ireland/ Enerveo seems to be part of SSE, who bought the business from ESB about 15 years ago.
b-unicycling (2022-03-29 19:08:30+00:00): Alright, the sign with the reference numbers says ESB, so I thought I was recording ground truth. I'll leave out the operator in future.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 16:57:58+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on https://www.osm.org/node/9545658124. Please don't use the production database to store your private information, we have the key note and description.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
V-Li (2022-02-28 20:46:04+00:00): Hallo,

bitte schreibe die Öffnungszeiten im von OSM lesbaren Format. Details findest du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Eine große Hilfe beim Anlegen der Öffnungszeiten ist https://webmapping.cyou/WebToOSMOH/
Syl (2022-03-02 10:15:01+00:00): Bonjour, il y avait bien une statue au milieu de la fontaine : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.465302433332&lng=-0.55670302666751&z=17&pKey=316352203217437&focus=photo&x=0.4112558911868959&y=0.5414349138006058&zoom=2
Elle n'existe plus ?
kapazao (2022-03-01 09:30:36+00:00): Buenas, no deberías asignar direcciones a los edificios, estas deberían estar solo en las puertas o puntos de interés donde sea necesario. Te dará problemas cuando por ejemplo en un mismo edificio haya varias puertas con distintos números.
Por otra parte te recomiendo no perder tiempo añadiendo addr:city, ya que normalmente es redundante porque los elementos están dentro de relaciones de la ciudad. En el caso de addr:postcode se podría añadir también el código postal a la relación necesaria y evitar ir poniéndolo en todas partes.
Para las direcciones de POI o puertas con que pongas calle y número de puerta suele ser suficiente.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117955316
alex_lofi (2022-03-01 21:12:21+00:00): No lo sabía ¡gracias!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117955316
alex_lofi (2022-03-01 21:15:14+00:00): Por otra parte, hay algunos edificios en Huétor que están señalados todos de golpe por manzanas ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121913913/ ) ¿debería separarlos o añadirles una puerta a cada casa y ponerles el número? Personalmente prefiero separar los edificios individuales pero no sé.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117955316
pyram (2022-03-01 14:44:47+00:00): Hallo kjon,

bei aller Liebe zum Vereinheitlichen von Tags (und halbautomatischem Ergänzen von faktisch redundanten Daten), aber warum bekommen Automaten jetzt plötzlich einen "Namen"?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1488318804
Und die Ergänzung von layer=1 bei  Überdachungen ist meist wohl auch überflüssig, wie hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/890187446/history (Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer )

Gruß
pyram
woodpeck (2022-03-10 10:28:03+00:00): Hallo kjon, das ist leider nicht das erste Mal, das Du durch blindes Anwenden von Name-Suggestion-Index-Edits auffällst. Bitte unterlasse das in Zukunft, und korrigiere, bevor Du irgendwelche anderen Edits machst, die Fehler, die Du damit in diesem Changeset erzeugt hast (so haben z.B. auch DSL-Verteilerkästen den Namen "Deutsche Telekom" erhalten). Ich werde künftige Changesets von Dir, in denen unzulässige Anwendungen des NSI vorkommen, komplett revertieren - es kann nicht sein, dass die Community hinter dem aufräumt, was de facto ein automatischer Edit ist. (Das gleiche gilt auch für Wikidata-Tags - füge diese bitte nur dort hinzu, wo Du Dich selbst von der Korrektheit überzeugt hast, und verlasse Dich nicht auf irgendwelche automatischen Vorschläge des Editors.)
woodpeck (2022-03-10 10:39:46+00:00): Bitte verzichte ebenso auf großflächige Anwendung des "alles reparieren"-Buttons im ID-Editor.
kartonage (2022-04-27 15:51:38+00:00): Mir ist in Berlin aufgefallen, dass kjon so ziemlich alles mit Namen belegt hat was noch nie einen Namen gehabt hat (Packstationen, Bankautomaten und eine Reihe anderer Automaten).
Allein das bei Packstationen von DHL drei Namen (alt_name, name und short_name) bekommen haben ist für mich nur verwunderlich.

Da kjon das ohne entsprechende Ankündigung und Absprache großflächig ohne Überprüfung an tausenden Objekten durchgeführt hat: spricht was dagegen das alle entsprechend wieder rauszuschmeißen? Es war weder erwünscht noch ist es entsprechend so dokumentiert.
woodpeck (2022-04-27 23:11:30+00:00): Ja, man sollte das aufräumen. Leider produziert der Benutzer kjon schneller neue unsinnige Daten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119748620) als wir die alten wegräumen...
user_5359 (2022-03-01 16:14:22+00:00): revert, mostly foreign keys
user_5359 (2022-03-01 09:53:25+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9545727781. What is the meaning of the tags
    JPT_KOD_JE = 1810
    JPT_NAZWA_ = powiat łańcucki
    _uid_ = 30
    adres = Ignacego Paderewskiego 5
    id = 318
    kod = 37-100
    miasto = Łańcut
    miejscowosc = Łańcut
    nazwa = CENTRUM MEDYCZNE W ŁAŃCUCIE SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ
    powiat = łańcucki
    poziom = I stopień
    telefon = (017)224 01 21
    wojewodztwo = podkarpackie
    www = http://cm-lancut.pl
?
Mordechai23 (2022-03-01 11:32:51+00:00): poorly performed import, sorry. Reverting
Mordechai23 (2022-03-01 11:38:41+00:00): also took care of similliar changesets in the area you commented on. Thanks for keeping a keen eye on it!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-03 09:41:16+00:00): Why you added not:brand:wikidata =Q6757382 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7516177407/history ?
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:46:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166634.
Mordechai23 (2022-03-02 12:15:40+00:00): jakich danych? co tu zmieniłeś?
Mordechai23 (2022-03-02 12:16:23+00:00): 10 tysięcy node'ów przesunąłeś o 1cm?
maraf24 (2022-03-02 15:04:18+00:00): Mapujesz z nieaktualnego orto.
Tego tracka w większości nie ma:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036073630
maraf24 (2022-03-02 15:06:01+00:00): Las i pole na jednym obszarze:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196409398
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:43:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166608.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:41:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166588.
DENelson83 (2022-03-20 06:58:56+00:00): In this case, it should really be just "Port Moody".  http://www4.nrcan.gc.ca/search-place-names/unique/JAMQU
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
unscathed-banjo (2022-04-15 10:53:28+00:00): Hey Smudge,

'(Now Closed)' in the name isn't a proper use of the name tag. 

The disused tag would've been better here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:

Also, the building is still standing, but the area was converted to a line in your edit? Was that intentional?
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:39:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166529.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:37:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166478.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:34:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166467.
pizben03 (2022-03-13 15:13:22+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117958286

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
pizben03 (2022-03-13 16:03:06+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117958434

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
b-unicycling (2022-08-27 07:25:13+00:00): Sorry, there's another batch today, but hopefully, we'll be done then.
dudone (2022-08-29 16:05:06+00:00): Sorry.  Can you tell me what I'm looking for as I have been using the JOSM search to find the stile=?? having downloaded the area highlighted.
The same applies to the other comments.
b-unicycling (2022-08-29 19:43:13+00:00): Maybe somebody else has looked for them already. I used this: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/stile#values, then you click on the suspicious tags like "stst" and then on overpass-turbo on the very top right. The table is rendered every day, so today's changes aren't reflected yet.
adrianojbr (2022-03-20 22:56:27+00:00): Olá, Raphaelkaart! Não se deve colocar o código da rodovia em name, mas tão somente em ref.
Raphaelkaart (2022-03-21 13:18:42+00:00): Bom dia Adriano!

Inseri o Nome da Rodovia porque a camada nomes de ruas do IBGE mostra o nome da Mesma!

mesmo assim obrigado por entrar em contato!

Atenciosamente,

Raphaelkaart
adrianojbr (2022-03-21 15:58:44+00:00): Eu percebi que a fonte de dados usada foi o IBGE. Mas sempre é bom fazer uma análise crítica da fonte usada, pois nem sempre a forma de representar os dados é a mesma usada no OSM. O IBGE Street Names é muito útil, mas às vezes tem esse problema de nomes fictício. Valeu!
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:31:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166423.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166413.
pizben03 (2022-03-13 16:03:14+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117958853

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
pizben03 (2022-03-13 16:03:25+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117958896

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source