piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jptolosa (2016-11-12 01:54:15+00:00): Hello,
the "enlarging area" doesn't exist anymore since 2012 approx: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323780484#map=16/-20.5586/-175.4066
katpatuka (2016-11-12 04:58:50+00:00): ok - I removed it. I didn't check for new imagery though - just had a look at http://volcano.si.edu/volcano.cfm?vn=243040
Jonathan Bennett (2015-01-23 11:56:49+00:00): Hello Kyle (assuming that's your name) and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for taking the time to improve the map, but you're not quite there yet. 

Assuming you're trying to add Clark Thomson's Elgin office to the map (which the web site says is in Hay Street): Go into edit mode, click on the "Point" button at the top left of the editor, then click on the map roughly where the offices are. When the point appears, go over to the left sidebar titled "Select feature type", and type "insurance" into the search box. You should then be able to pick Insurance Office from the list, and fill in the rest of the contact details like address, phone number and website.

Let me know using OSM's messaging system if you need any more help.
mariusbey (2015-01-23 11:30:30+00:00): added locations that accept bitcoin in hannover. Part of the PEY, bitcoin boulevard project
Nakaner (2015-01-27 20:19:57+00:00): Könntest du mal bitte gefälligst beim Hochladen einen Changeset-Kommentar eingeben!
SomeoneElse (2015-01-23 12:15:33+00:00): You've removed the car park entirely.  Previously it was mapped as "private", meaning that no-one would think that they ought to be able to park in it.

The risk now is that someone will re-add from aerial imagery without access tags and it'll show on OSM as a public car park again (though hopefully people will realise that it's within the school grounds, and not).
SomeoneElse (2015-02-05 18:49:14+00:00): Hi - just spotted that you've deleted the amenity=school http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141575080/history - just wondered if that was deliberate?  There's a building=school within the area; is it no longer used as an actual school?
buedner (2015-01-23 15:05:40+00:00): Es scheint es schon seine Richtigkeit gehabt zu haben mit der Straßennummerierung.
siehe hier:
http://www.list.smwa.sachsen.de/inspire/ows?version=1.1.1&&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS
ZiCAD (2015-01-24 18:24:29+00:00): Hallo,
folgende Gründe sprachen für die Änderung:
- Eine klassifizerte Straße sollte zur eindeutigen Identifikation nur eine Bezeichnung haben, deshalb war auch in der simple-Ansicht von Potlatch die Doppelbezeichnung mit einem Ausrufezeichen markiert.
- In der Karte der klassifizierten Straßen im Ingenieurbüro ist der Stadtring nur mit B96 bezeichnet.
- Die vom LISt in das Geoportal Sachsen geladenen Bundesstraßen weisen für den Stadtring ebenso nur B96 aus.
Mazezito (2015-04-18 01:05:11+00:00): A estátua já tem a espada... :)
Schönberger (2015-01-23 12:46:12+00:00): Der Schutzstreifen ist nur bergwärts!
Schönberger (2015-01-23 12:56:54+00:00): Radeln in Gegenrichtung ist frei
muralito (2015-01-24 00:09:34+00:00): Revertido.

@aguiarjuliano: Por favor, leer la documentacion de la etiqueta building.
muralito (2025-08-22 19:46:06+00:00): Hi. This is probably not a parking. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3305938771
Do you remember the place?
joost schouppe (2025-08-23 17:14:31+00:00): No estoy seguro. En base de mi GPX del viaje, es posible que me gare ahi - por no muy probable. Para mi esta bien si lo borras
trigpoint (2015-01-27 16:38:38+00:00): Adding this node is redundant as the extra Leicester City Council info can be added to the existing building.

I am not sure it is really called City Hall however, that sounds too American. Please can you check?

Isn't this the building where Willie Thorne Snooker was?
Makda (2015-01-27 18:28:52+00:00): pretty sure it is called City Hall - address at the bottom of leicester.gov.uk web page :
Leicester City Council, City Hall, 115 Charles Street, Leicester, LE1 1FZ.
Makda (2015-01-27 18:30:08+00:00): also see
http://www.leicester.gov.uk/contact-us/maps-and-directions/
Weide (2015-01-24 07:30:53+00:00): Feldsieper Str.: Nur Nodes können highway=bus_stop haben. area=yes fehlt.
4rch (2015-02-15 09:57:18+00:00): deleted objects in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28858621
SomeoneElse (2015-02-09 22:41:45+00:00): Hi - just spotted that you've joined Colbeck Street and the car park http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323832277 to the west.  Do these definitely join?  The imagery suggests probably not.  There's already a note in the area http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/277305 , so I've added a comment to that to say check access to the west too.
samely (2015-02-11 04:13:42+00:00): Hi there, yes there appears to be a wall separating the street and the parking aisle. I've disconnected them and connected by a footway. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
Supaplex (2015-01-24 06:43:58+00:00): Hi CongLeith

通常行政邊界是用關係來畫行政邊界
一個行政區會有數條邊界組成，像是下面的例子
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4086463

而單一邊界會有數個行政區共用，文件如下
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=administrative?uselang=zh-TW

我會著手修改石城里，你可以看看我是怎麼畫

Supaplex
Nakaner (2015-02-14 17:24:14+00:00): Kannst du mir mal bitte erklären, was an dieser Fläche ein Weinberg sein soll? Oder wurde da zwischenzeitlich ein Wengert angelegt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323834207/history
changchun_1 (2015-02-14 21:31:19+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, war wohl ein Tipfehler.
muralito (2015-01-23 23:57:18+00:00): Hola. ¿Podrias explicar que restricciones intentaste agregar en este cambio?
Thebuenleo (2015-01-24 00:04:50+00:00): Hola, quise arreglar el sentido de la calle Independendencia, el cual NO es doble mano desde la colectora RP4 hasta José Hernández, sino mano única. Al editarlo me quedó marcado el sentido pero en el mapa no veo los cambios
muralito (2015-01-24 16:42:31+00:00): Eso creo quedo como querias, tenes que esperar un rato (depende de la escala) y/o actualizar el cache para que aparezcan en el mapa.

Lo que necesito que me expliques son las 9 restricciones que agregaste, para ver si se corresponden con lo que quisiste agregar, o hay que corregir alguna. (Algunas parecen razonables, otras quizas no tanto, aunque a veces los que hacen las reglas del transito piensan distinto)
Thebuenleo (2015-01-24 16:50:52+00:00): Lo que hice es que los que vienen por independencia larcamon, alberto grande, coronado, almafuerte y hernandes no puedan doblar en independencia en sentido hacia RP4 porque es contramano. Fijate si alguna quedó mal, es la primera vez que edito un mapa
muralito (2015-01-26 19:32:09+00:00): OK. Para que no puedan doblar esta bien usar las restricciones, pero en el caso que mencionas solo bastaba con flechar "oneway=yes" Independencia en el sentido correspondiente. Con solo, eso el no doblar está implicado. Otras de las restricciones que agregaste si estarian bien, como es el caso de http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4511980 

Cualquier duda podes consultar en el foro de Argentina. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=49
muralito (2015-01-26 19:32:38+00:00): Olvide decir que quedo arreglado segun tu descripcion.
Thebuenleo (2015-01-26 19:35:53+00:00): Bueno muchas gracias
Plop76 (2015-01-23 19:40:55+00:00): C'est habité donc normalement c'est plutôt un hameau qu'un place=locality :)
ndm (2015-01-23 19:15:53+00:00): Good to see some North Bristol updates

I'd already added a swing gate on Highwood Lane where you added a gate so I merged them.

I was also a bit confused about having swing gates on the administrative boundary near the airfield -- does that make sense?
Toffer12 (2015-01-24 09:42:52+00:00): Ah, fooey! That gate was supposed to have been placed on the road not the boundary! I'm surprised that Josm didn't come up with a validation warning. I'll have to add that to the software.
Weide (2015-01-24 07:33:02+00:00): Lohring: nur Nodes können highway=bus_stop haben
tyr_asd (2015-01-23 20:23:21+00:00): Thanks for mapping the new speed cameras! :) But, I think adding "enforcement" relations is still necessary to set the direction of the camera and from where to where the speed is monitored? See  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement
wavexx (2015-01-31 20:24:16+00:00): Thanks for the notice. I simply tagged the node using josm's presets, so I didn't realize there was something more to it.

These speed cameras look designed to take images from both directions. I don't know if this is just to be able to mount the same shell on both sides of the road (ideas?).
tyr_asd (2015-02-02 13:15:47+00:00): If they are used in both directions (idk if that's the case / isn't it hard to measure the cars' speeds & take photos if there is contraflow traffic?) we could map that as two separate enforcement relations…
wavexx (2015-02-02 13:16:48+00:00): I have fixed the relations earlier today.
tyr_asd (2015-02-02 13:18:14+00:00): perfect, thanks! :)
Jojo4u (2015-03-22 11:14:57+00:00): Hallo Uhkabu, Mehrheitsmeinung ist dass Bürgersteige ohne Trennung (z.B. Grünstreifen) nicht separat gemappt werden sondern als sidewalk an die Straße kommen. Momentan ist doppelt, ich würde gern deinen footway wieder entfernen.
LG Joachim
Jojo4u (2015-04-12 11:32:02+00:00): ... habe den separaten Gehweg entfernt.

LG Joachim
ma-rt-in (2015-01-23 19:47:18+00:00): Warum hast du dem Way 323815487 wieder die Hausnummer angeklascht, obwohl diese bereits dran sind?
4rch (2015-06-16 17:24:07+00:00): Is "Zuckerschiff" the name of the wreck? Are minefields in Morocco called "Minenfeld"?
Seandebasti (2015-06-16 18:02:23+00:00): Yes, but in germany, I forgot to tag it with name:de, I corrected it
Matija Nalis (2023-03-30 19:29:06+00:00): Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here?
luiswoo (2015-01-24 02:58:25+00:00): Это не железнодорожная платформа. Вопрос: это электроподстанция или здание вокзала?
Nakaner (2015-05-19 13:41:02+00:00): Could you please fix "railway:name:<operator 1>"=Deutsche Bahn and all similar tags? That's just wrong. <operator 1> and <operator 2> are placeholders in the tagging documentation and should be replaced by DB and NS.

The right tagging at this node would be:
railway:name:NS=<name of NS for Emmerich Grenze> 
railway:name:DB="Emmerich Grenze" 
railway:ref:NS=<abbrevation of NS for this border point> 
railway:ref:DB=EXEM 
railway=border

Everything between < and > in our tagging documentation is a placeholder.
JJJWegdam (2015-05-22 13:48:03+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up. I'll fix it before the end of june (I'm a bit busy with my study atm - apologies).
mavl (2015-01-25 13:22:21+00:00): Здравствуйте.
В Тобольске Сельская улица переименована в Академическую улицу?
Nakaner (2015-05-30 19:39:44+00:00): Bahnübergangsschranken werden nicht als barrier=lift_gate gemappt, da sie das Routing stören. Es gibt die Nodes mit railway=level_crossing und Zusatztags wie crossing:barrier=*. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2617822581/history Ich habe es am Bahnübergang am Mastweidenweg geändert.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-24 10:35:21+00:00): Would it be possible to be a bit more specific what 's happened here and where?  It's quite a wide changeset.  It turns up in a local feed of local changes, so I know that there are _some_ changes near me, but I don't know which.  What was the problem before?  What was the evidence that the problem was a lack of connection rather than something else?  Did you let the previous mappers know that you've fixed a problem, so that (hopefully) the problem won't happen again?
SomeoneElse (2015-01-24 10:21:05+00:00): Hi - you wouldn't happen to know what the access rights are on the footpaths behind Dacrylate are, would you?  Is there any signage?
SomeoneElse (2015-01-24 10:24:58+00:00): Is the gate http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3306776753 on the service road or the footpath?  What are the access rights on the service road and the footpath?  I live northwest of there and am trying to work out whether it could be used as a shortcut to Portland Country Park...
muralito (2015-05-15 12:30:30+00:00): Hola Hegaro.
Lo que no es correcto de estos cambios es que duplicaste muchas calles (por no decir todas), cuando lo que habria que hacer en estos casos es solo agregar el nombre.
kreuzschnabel (2019-01-06 19:13:06+00:00): Hallo 461103, es ist zwar schon ein paar Jahre her, aber ich verweise trotzdem mal auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_straight_ways_straight. Wenn für ein paar hundert Meter ein vierter Fahrstreifen dazukommt, gibt es keine Notwendigkeit, den Way um eine halbe Streifenbreite zu verschwenken, damit er auch ja exakt in der Fahrbahnmitte ist. Das macht zwei Knicke in die Kartendarstellung, die nicht da sind. Gerade Straßen werden durch gerade OSM-Wege dargestellt. Und es ist auch unnötig, einem schnurgeraden Stück Straße alle 30 Meter einen Node zu geben, wenn einer vorn und einer hinten auch reicht :)
SomeoneElse (2015-01-24 10:55:07+00:00): Hi - I think that something may have gone a bit wrong with pinning down some of the locations here.  http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3306866930 is a new node in Stafford, and the name is "The Swan Hotel", but that is actually an existing hotel some distance to the north http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166534942 .  Whereabouts within the hotel is the bicycle repair station?  Is it really open 24/7, and public access (i.e. if I'm not a hotel customer and need to use it at 3am, can I)?
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-01-24 16:29:38+00:00): Yes it's open 24/7, and it's outdoors.  The name is meant to help identify the place.
Most likely it is a geometry problem as the locations were collected using a GPS receiver and not necessarily rectified back to the air photos.

Are you near enough to field check this location?
SomeoneElse (2015-01-24 19:54:19+00:00): (for completeness, echoing the email) sorry - the centre of Stafford is not really in my patch.  The "Mappa Mercia" crowd (English West Midlands) may have someone local or familiar with it, though.  I'll ask on IRC to see if anyone knows there too.
kempelen (2018-03-13 09:27:38+00:00): Szia!
A public_transport=stop_position pontnak az úttest részének kell lennie. A megállótáblánál lévő pontot public_transport=platform-nak hívjuk. (highway=bus_stop címkével együtt)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3306915436
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-27 09:44:55+00:00): Bardzo proszę o poprawienie tych wszystkich obiektów w Krasnobrodzie poprzesuwanych do nieskalibrowanego podkładu Binga.
user_5359 (2019-07-24 18:44:01+00:00): Hello! Did you know the wikipages for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes#United_States and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign ? The combination name and description isn't very helpful.
Bill Leddy (2019-07-25 14:13:20+00:00): Thank you for your comment. I’m planning to change the tag in most cases to: traffic_sign=bike_route:US:D11-1. D11-1 is the US designation for the sign. Is that better? Also, some of the signs are a combination usually of a Bike Route sign and a directional arrow. In those cases I’m planning to use traffic_sign=bike_route:US:D11-1;double_arrow:US:M7-5 or similar. Is that the correct way to combine signs?
Polarbear (2015-06-06 16:57:49+00:00): Hallo - warum sind der Friedhof Adlershof und das Militaergelaende Teil des Waldgebiets Koellnische Heide?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-24 23:44:43+00:00): Just checking - has "CeX Derby" really got the word "Derby" in the name?  I walked past it the other day and didn't notice it (although I have to say I wasn't especially looking).
Blobo123 (2015-02-26 05:17:29+00:00): I got the branch name from CeX's website, only legal way to name them. https://uk.webuy.com/stores/ 

Regarding if it should be tagged in the name tag or in a separate "branch" tag, I saw that this proposal wasn't appoved and that less than 20.000 nodes have it, mainly in Japan and Russia. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch
SomeoneElse (2015-02-26 16:59:40+00:00): Well, the bottom of that page says "© All site contents copyright 1999-2015, CeX Ltd. All trademarks acknowledged. E&OE. "  so I'd say that's definitely NOT a legal way to name them (or at least - not a way acccepted with OSM).  Personally, I prefer just to use the name that's displayed on the shop :)
Blobo123 (2015-02-27 01:52:37+00:00): I'm not saying using "A" instead of "A: B" is wrong (being A = Company, B = Branch.). I see these posibilities with branches, and IDK if there is a concensus: 1) A - B, 2) A B, 3) A: B, 4) A "branch tag" B. Correct me here if there is. 

I like 1, probably used 2 to continue a trend with this company.
yogi_ks (2015-02-22 08:11:00+00:00): Unless you know the official boundary region, its good not to draw the boundary. And first, its good to add a point for the suburb here.:)
keithonearth (2023-10-09 21:08:19+00:00): I've deleted the AssociatedStreet relation that this changeset added, as its addition was unexplained, does not match how the wiki says this tag should be used, and it looks like an error. Let me know if I am mistaken, and I can revert my edit. 

Relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4513471/history

My changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142366737
Hawk777 (2023-10-09 21:33:39+00:00): It was based on what, at the time (eight years ago), was the most complete and reasonable documentation I could find, the Karlsruhe schema, of which I chose the “Using relations to associate house and street” option (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=2323041#Using_relations_to_associate_house_and_street_(optional)). Semantically it seemed like the far saner option to me, since a relation actually ties the objects themselves (street and house) together, rather than relying in icky string matching (e.g. the association would remain associated if the street were renamed, while the stringly-typed addr: stuff would break, but it seems nobody cares about that these days).
Hawk777 (2023-10-09 21:36:49+00:00): I don’t understand what you mean by “does not match how the wiki says this tag should be used” though. Per (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet), it appears that it should have two members (a Way for the street and a Node or Area for the house, with those member role names), and optionally a name tag with the name of the street, which is precisely what I added in revision 1. So in what way was it incorrect?
Hawk777 (2023-10-09 21:37:21+00:00): By version 17 it appeared to have lost the house, but AFAICT it was correct when I created it?
keithonearth (2023-10-09 23:09:15+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me!

I was referring to the lack of address nodes, or houses/buildings contained in the relation. It's a relation for mapping addresses, but contained no addresses, just the street.

But I had not checked the full history, so it would make sense that you'd done it correctly to start with, but everything had been deleted over the years, except a short section of Broadway itself, making the relation no longer match its purpose. It was a Josm error message about this that drew my attention.

It certainly seems like the `addr:*` scheme has become the favoured convention, so I think my deletion of the relation should remain. Do you agree?
Hawk777 (2023-10-09 23:24:26+00:00): Yeah I’m fine with it staying gone. Thanks for cleaning up!
stefanct (2021-05-24 11:26:29+00:00): Was ist die Quelle für den Wegnamen "Alm"?
user_7581226 (2021-05-24 12:09:24+00:00): Viele Almen haben speziell in der Region Kirchdorf in Tirol die Adresse Alm. Diese würde ich heute mit addr place mappen, und entsprechend, daher Wege mit noname=yes kennzeichnen. 
Gerne kannst Du solche Korrekturen anwenden.

Es freut mich dass du dich in der gegenständlichen Region in Frage der Qualitätsoptimierung einbringst. 

Zum Account, wer des Lesens von Römischen Ziffern mächtig ist, dürfte erkennen dass hiermit die Jahreszahl bis 2018 gemeint ist. Nachdem ich einer der produktivsten OSM Mitwirkenden in Österreich war, habe es ich als vernünftig erachtet aufgrund regelmäßig verfügbarer bessere Luftbilder entsprechend meine Edits nach Jahren einzugrenzen. 
Mein Zentaler Basisaccount ist beautifulplacesMMXX Mail Adresse johann.haag@hxg.at 
mein aktueller Arbeitsaccount hingegen beautifulplacesMMXXI nun aber inaktiv
Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:35:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3307159742/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
geozeisig (2015-01-27 08:28:21+00:00): Warum wurden die PLZ in der Ruthstraße 1,3,5 gelöscht? Sie waren korrekt.
atpl_pilot (2015-01-27 11:15:51+00:00): User fhigoq ist ein FAKE-UIser der Daten zerstört. Sofort SPERREN.
atpl_pilot (2015-01-27 12:52:12+00:00): Vandalismus revertet.
Polarbear (2017-01-16 18:31:28+00:00): Gewässer und Spielplatz sind Teil des Parks, ein Ausstanzen per multipolygon ist nicht erforderlich.
woodpeck (2015-01-25 15:19:13+00:00): Bitte erläutere umgehend, wieso Du in diesem und allen Deinen anderen Changesets bis heute ausschliesslich Edits des Benutzers "atpl_pilot" revertiert hast. Ein changeset-Kommentar von "fix" ist für diese Art von Edits nicht akzeptabel.
ndm (2015-01-24 12:01:56+00:00): Were these surveyed? Do they need a source:name OS_Locator? Maybe a source Bing as well?
kartler175 (2015-05-04 09:52:16+00:00): Abbiegebeschränkungen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4513863
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4513864
Mitglieder passen nich zum Typ der Beschränkung
Besteht hier überhaupt irgend eine Beschränkung?
minkus (2015-05-04 10:31:39+00:00): In die Straße Am Kirchberg darf man von der Ulmer Straße aus nicht reinfahren. An der Ulmer Straße stehen entsprechende Gebotsschilder.
kartler175 (2015-05-04 18:00:36+00:00): Dann ist sind die Abbeigebeschränkungen falsch und bewirken gerade das Gegenteil.
Routingbeispiel: http://osrm.at/c9t
minkus (2015-05-04 22:15:13+00:00): Mmmhh, interessant, bei Graphhopper funktioniert's (https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=48.259456%2C10.092402&point=48.257556%2C10.092573&locale=de&layer=Lyrk). Jedenfalls vielen Dank für den Hinweis, Ich werde der Sache mal nachgehen.
kartler175 (2015-05-05 08:14:57+00:00): Vermutlich beachtet Graphhopper die Abbiegbeschränkungen nicht. Ich würde mich an deiner Stelle mit der Bedeutung von from und to im Zusammenhang mit der Beschränkungsart only_ * beschäftigen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction#Wichtig
minkus (2015-05-07 05:48:56+00:00): Mittlerweile hat OSRM die Änderung umgesetzt. Ich werde allerdings die Konstruktion mit den zwei fast direkt nebeneinander liegenden Punkten auf der Ulmer Straße auch noch bereinigen. Nochmal danke für den Hinweis.
_al (2015-01-25 08:35:57+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge!

Ein paar Kleinigkeiten:
* Bitte keine Adressen auf Ställe, Garagen, Lagerhallen o.ä. Normalerweise hat nur ein Wohn-/gewerbliches Gebäude eine Adresse und es gibt Hausnummern auch selten doppelt.
* bitte addr:place verwenden, wenn sich der Name auf einen Ort (statt einer Straße) bezieht.
* track impliziert eine landwirtschaftliche Nutzung. Nur wenn dort zu Fuß gehen/radfahren verboten ist (es steht dort z.B. ein Schild), muss man es explizit anführen.

Weiterhin viel Spaß mit OSM!

Servus, Andreas
Nakaner (2015-04-12 13:23:42+00:00): Du musst auch railway:signal:(main|distant|combined):states=* taggen, wenn die du Signale auf der OpenRailwayMap sehen möchtest (oder am besten gleich die Vorlagen verwenden, die ergänzen das automatisch).
berndw (2015-04-14 14:59:49+00:00): Das überlasse ich den Spezialisten.
Dafür kann ich aber bestätigen, das die Bezeichnungen der Signale in beiden Bahnhöfen stimmen.

Railwaymapping ist nicht mein Gebiet ;-)
Klaas Kruik (2015-01-24 12:49:51+00:00): Oops... mijn allereerste edit en niet aangegeven wat ik deed. Een (deel van de) Uilensingel was gelabelled als "Busbaan Tanthof"; dit gecorrigeerd. (Busbaan Tanthof is zo'n tweehonderd meter naar het westen.)
theandyseitz (2015-02-11 09:31:21+00:00): Сами уберете?
Knight_1984 (2015-03-02 08:21:41+00:00): Какова причина?
Knight_1984 (2015-03-02 08:22:18+00:00): Нужны доказательства размещения в данном месте склада боеприпасов?