piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:43:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
wille (2018-10-23 20:49:51+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63805139
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:39:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
Rainero (2018-10-23 21:16:52+00:00): Hallo Maria Murasova,

willkommen bei OSM!
Ich habe gesehen, daß dies erst dein 5. Änderungssatz bei OSM ist und mal einen Blick darauf geworfen, weil es eine Menge Änderungen in kurzer Zeit waren.

Soweit ich sehe, hast du Angaben zu POIs (=Points Of Interest) aktualisiert.

Eine kleine Bitte für die nächsten Änderungen: könntest du einen aussagekräftigen Kommentar zu dem Änderungssatz schreiben? Also z.B. "Geschäfte in der Redidenzstraße überprüft und aktualisiert" statt "Ich habe es upgedated". Ich denke du hast dir einige Mühe und Arbeit gemacht, all die Geschäfte zu überprüfen und das ist es wert, wenn du das genauer hinschreibst. Dann wissen alle, die hier ebenfalls Änderungen machen, was du editiert hast.

Mehr dazu im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viel Spaß weiterhin bei OSM und viele Grüße,
Rainer
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:28:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
goedegazelle (2018-10-30 07:23:21+00:00): Nobody is going to interpret "gt" as grass;trees.
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:36:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:30:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:30:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:32:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:40:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:32:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:25:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:27:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:27:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
mavl (2018-11-08 15:38:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64295450 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
dktue (2018-10-25 07:33:33+00:00): Dein Changeset wurde korrigiert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63845784#map=19/48.52209/9.04575
ajf3934221 (2018-10-25 12:27:08+00:00): ah, danke! Wie hast DU das so schnell mitbekommen? Verwendest Du osmCHA?
dktue (2018-10-26 15:42:06+00:00): Ich nutze den WhoDidIt-RSS-Feed.
andrewwiseman (2019-03-12 20:20:34+00:00): Thanks for mapping! Please don't fill in the name field though, unless you know the name. It is for proper names like "St Mary's School" or "North Street".
highflyer74 (2018-10-25 12:32:08+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte beachte, dass wir alles nur einmal erfassen. Das gilt bis auf wenige Ausnahmen auch für Adressen. Sei deshalb so nett, nicht jedem Objekt addr:* Daten anzuhängen. Danke!

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
highflyer74 (2018-10-25 12:44:24+00:00): Noch als Hinweis: in diesem Fall ist die Adresse bereits an der Schule selbst erfasst, und diese wiederum an diesem Umriss: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27140891. Das wird bei größeren Einrichtungen meist so gemacht.
!MRGBoss (2018-10-28 20:56:14+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, werde ich in Zukunft berücksichtigen. LG
b-jazz (2018-10-23 19:12:11+00:00): Hey there Morgan. I love (some of) your movies. :)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for your contributions. I noticed that one of your "buildings" actually connected to a road, which triggers some validation warnings that you probably weren't aware of. As a rule of thumb, you want to make sure buildings surround just the physical structure of a building and not things like yards and driveways and such.
JeroenHoek (2018-10-24 07:06:57+00:00): Bedankt!
eggie (2018-10-23 19:12:31+00:00): removed... please look at addressnode nr 4
Hjart (2018-10-23 21:07:14+00:00): Hvorfor har du tagget stien som at der ikke er adgang til den?
olezinck (2018-10-24 10:47:38+00:00): Jeg har rettet den stien lidt til. Den skulle gerne være tagget "Til fods".
GerdP (2018-10-24 07:24:27+00:00): Hi! You aded a highway=parking_aisle here.
You probably know that the correct tagging would be highway=service + service=parking_aisle.
I did not correct this typo because I think the way is in fact part of the driveway. 
It seems to be the only way to get to the building.
eggie (2018-10-24 07:48:18+00:00): Dag Ninjoh.. Wat je hier hebt gedaan is het verwijderen van de details van de landuse 3dshapes import en gewoon een grote begraafplaats getekend. Vind je dat nu een verbetering?
Dit was je edit.  http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63806869
MVG,
Eggie
Ninjoh (2018-10-24 12:31:09+00:00): GerdP, you're right, I was pretty tired when I made this changeset, I must've messed up somehow. Anyway, it is indeed probably better tagged as part of the driveway, I'll change it.

Eggie: Ja dit vind ik beter, het is immers *landuse*, en al deze grond wordt *gebruikt* in het abstracte geheel "begraafplaats". Deze manier van taggen helpt ook als je bijv. een naam wilt geven aan een begraafplaats in zijn geheel. Als je goed hebt gekeken heb je al gezien dat ik nog een note tag heb achtergelaten waarin ik zeg dat zo'n begraafplaats het verdient om gedetailleerder ingetekend te worden door middel van o.a nauwkeurige BGT data als achtergrond. Wanneer iemand dit in detail intekent kan dit beter niet gebeuren zoals hier het geval was na de 3dshapes import, waar de voetpaden witte vlekken op de kaart vormen en de begraafplaats in feite opgesplitst is in meerdere kleinere begraafplaatsjes. De paden zouden ingetekend moeten worden als voetpad, en eigenlijk met additionele area:highway vlakken er onder, het gras kan getagd worden met landcover=grass of landuse=grass. Misschien dat er nog wat specifiekers bestaat om de plekken zelf waar mensen begraven liggen aan te geven, maar misschien ook niet.

Zie trouwens ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcemetery
Waar men zegt: "Draw the outline of the area which will include the graves, footways, service roads and even inner green spaces as it is very likely that they will be used for future graves. Do not include the nearby parking areas. "

Ik zal je tegemoetkomen en ik beloof alvast dat ik binnenkort de details van de begraafplaats ook mooi inteken.
eggie (2018-10-24 12:41:32+00:00): Oke Ninjoh.. succes met het vervolg.
MVG,
Eggie
flohoff (2018-10-24 13:24:05+00:00): Moin Akashi,
den hier verstehe ich nicht. Wieso entfernst du den weg? Das ist ein highway=service und damit schon ganz klar privat. Trotzdem gibt es dort einen weg und eine Verbindung die du jetzt gelöscht hast.

Flo
Akashi (2018-10-24 13:57:42+00:00): Hallo Flo!

Ganz einfach: Ich habe diesen Streckenabschnitt letztens in meine Radtour eingebaut und stand vor einem verschlossen Hoftor. Somit handelt es sich nicht um öffentlichen Verkehrsraum, der für jedermann passierbar ist.
flohoff (2018-10-24 14:05:54+00:00): Aeh ja - Aber warum hast du denn versucht da durchzufahren? Das ist in der Karte (oder war vor deiner änderung) als service  die nicht für die öffentlichkeit ist deutlich eingetragen. 

Flo
flohoff (2018-10-24 14:46:47+00:00): 
Also - ich habe das wieder eingetragen und habe ein barrier=gate auf der Hofseite der Brücke eingetragen. Damit ist klar das es nicht nur eine service ist die nicht für die Öffentlichkeit ist sondern auch eine physische barriere existiert.

Flo
archie (2018-10-23 19:09:19+00:00): Jag har bestämt för mig att den väg som du märkte upp som track är utbygd till en service-väg. Är det inte där på slutet av vägen som ett vindkraftverk skall uppföras? Eller tar jag fel?
archie (2018-10-24 14:48:21+00:00): Hej Mann, ich zweifle an deinen Angaben bezgl. der Wegeigenschaften. Am Ende des Weges wird eine Windkraftanlage aufgebaut werden. Der Weg oder die besser die Straße ist meiner Kenntnis ausgebaut worden. Kannst du dies bestätigen?
tux67 (2018-10-24 07:16:52+00:00): Das mit dem Namen gilt auch für die Totenhalle. Hilfreich hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Friedhofmapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63807216
Matthew Darwin (2018-10-24 12:59:50+00:00): Hi.  You changed the English name of the road, but not the French name... so they no longer match.

You've renamed part of the road which is not strictly the bridge.  Is this intended?

Should the tag "bridge_name" be used instead of renaming the road?
tux67 (2018-10-24 07:07:24+00:00): Hi WolfGb, einige Anmerkungen zu dem Änderungssatz:
Das Modehaus - solange es nicht ein Kaufhaus über alle Etagen des Gebäudes ist, machst es Sinn das als Punkt (Node) zu mappen. Desweiteren mußte hier shop=xx verwendet werden, es ist nicht gewünscht das Name Tag zu verwenden um die Funktion zu beschreiben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
Das Eiscafe habe ich noch um ein paar Details (Name, Facebookseite) ergänzt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63807607
WolfGb (2018-10-24 12:22:30+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise
aseerel4c26 (2018-10-24 19:26:20+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! :-) 

Für Andere:Ich habe zu dieser Bearbeitung eine Mail geschrieben, das geht für den Anfang bestimmt leichter.
aseerel4c26 (2018-10-24 20:14:02+00:00): ... per Mail geklärt: pferdefreundlich (inkl. Anbindeplatz), aber ohne Übernachtungsmöglichkeit.
Anakil (2018-10-23 21:31:54+00:00): Bonjour querrix, Merci de ta contributions,
je vois juste que tu as ajouté de nombreux polygones sans indiquer de tags dessus ! (J'imagine que ce sont tous les bâtiments, j'ai donc mis building=yes à tous).

Il ne faut pas oublier de donner une valeur au polygone après l'avoir tracé ! ;-) 

Happy mapping !
MKnight (2018-10-24 09:40:54+00:00): Moin,
Du hast hier traffic_signals:direction entfernt, warum?

Ich habe es wieder rückgängig gemacht.
mavl (2018-10-24 17:23:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Просто для информации.  
  
Некоторые дома получились непрямоугольными. Чтобы этого избежать в редакторе iD есть команда контекстного меню "Сделать углы прямыми" (также клавиша S для выделенного объекта).  
  
Этот пакет правок сдвигает улицы. Сейчас улица Гагарина проходит сквозь дом [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326198253]. Перед редактированием нужно сдвигать спутниковые снимки под GPS-треки [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2].  
  
В тег addr:housenumber добавлены номера километров [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326199339]. В этот тег нужно помещать только номера домов. Адрес заправки можно указать через тег addr:full. Например, [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351222094].  
  
Буквы в номерах домов нужно использовать большие (131А вместо 131а) [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr].  
  
Для названий улиц в России есть соглашение (нужно указывать "Солдатская улица", а не "улица Солдатская" [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3].
pio2_122 (2018-10-23 21:10:50+00:00): Why did you remove building with address Stare Brynki 36? According to official database, it's still existing.
pio2_122 (2018-12-22 16:43:41+00:00): Thanks for answer...
Mike Baggaley (2018-10-24 12:02:13+00:00): Hi, on ways 637278515, 637113285 and 637278514 access=public has been set. This is not a recognised value. If your intention it to indicate that it is a public right of way, please use foot=designated and designation=public_footpath. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
GerdP (2018-10-24 07:18:43+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticied this changeset because of the tag highway=crossing used on this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637255597
This tag should not be used on ways, only on nodes, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
You mapped some separate ways for cyclists and pedestrians here but these ways are not connected to the same roads as the major roads, for example there is no connection to Rua Edmond de Souza Melo
coming from
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637253975
I am not a local, so I don't know if this is correct. Please double check all connections when you add a separate way, see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
GerdP (2018-10-24 07:35:22+00:00): Hi! I've noticed that you have problems mapping a turning_circle. 
If you draw it as a circular way you should not use highway=turning_circle, this tag is used when you place a single node in the middle of the turning circle like I did here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63821175
If you prefer to draw a circular way here you should use highway=service (maybe add service=driveway), but not junction=roundabout. See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle
letihu (2019-02-05 20:21:25+00:00): Auch hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637289409/history
fehlen tags :-(
viloan (2018-10-23 20:06:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
andrewwiseman (2018-12-11 00:34:43+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. It looks like you moved these residential roads so now they overlap with buildings and are offset. Let me know if you have any questions, I can fix it for you.
sejohnson (2018-10-25 14:44:43+00:00): You seem to have added two addresses to this building. Also, 'source_1' and 'source_2' are not appropriate fields for these tags. Please use the proper fields.
viloan (2018-10-23 20:20:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PierZen (2018-10-24 00:35:18+00:00): You deleted power line ways and re-created them. This practice that you repeat in many changesets is not acceptable, as the history of contributions is lost.
eggie (2018-11-26 21:01:04+00:00): Hoi @win88.. Met editor iD zien we nog al eens schade door schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus. Wellicht beter overstappen naar JOSM. Daar schuif je niet met je edit muis (links) maar met rechts.
Overigens prima dat je het brievenbusbestand aanpast. We houden niet veel meer over.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
MVG,
Eggie
@win88 (2018-11-26 21:12:00+00:00): Heb ik iets misklikt dan?
eggie (2018-11-26 21:38:25+00:00): Gelukkig niet :)
maciek-szn (2018-10-24 06:22:53+00:00): Czy mógłbyś łaskawie przestać być nadgorliwy? Podpisanie umowy nie jest równoznaczne z rozpoczęciem prac budowlanych. Wycofałem zmiany. Serio, ogarniamy, co się dzieje w Szczecinie.
ftrebien (2019-02-11 14:05:44+00:00): Este lado da rua, mapeado por cima de prédios, já está aberto ao tráfego? Seu comentário na via me sugere que ainda não. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619503804
maciek-szn (2018-10-24 06:23:03+00:00): Wycofane.
Константин Гам (2018-10-23 22:39:11+00:00): Не стоит завышать статус дворовых проедов до улиц, вы тем самым нарушаете приоритеты дорожного графа и просто вводите в заблуждение пользователей карты.
Menak Vishap (2018-11-13 14:11:45+00:00): Да, признаю свою ошибку, спасибо что поправили.
szalona_entropia (2018-10-25 14:41:53+00:00): co to są "znaki wyłączające z węzła"?
szalona_entropia (2018-10-25 14:46:57+00:00): A gdzie byś na tym węźle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/50.2740/18.7192 wstawił tagi z nazwą węzła?
Bo gdyby to zrobić tak samo, jak proponujesz tutaj, to nazwa węzła by się musiała pojawić ze 4 razy dla jednego kierunku ruchu.
RobertWH (2018-10-23 21:36:17+00:00): Can I cancel this change request?
eggie (2018-10-24 07:37:02+00:00): Review.. lijkt me oke. Het vlak het ik als inner in een multipolygoon gezet anders zie je er op afgeleide kaarten niets van.
MVG,
Eggie
gabro00 (2018-10-24 10:39:53+00:00): Ha tudod, használd a source:maxspeed taget. Másoknak segít a karbantartásban. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed
viloan (2018-10-23 21:59:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-10-24 06:41:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht
eggie (2018-10-24 06:43:39+00:00): Dg Martijn.. Probeer svp het gebied van je edits iets kleiner te houden. Dat maakt controle makkelijker.
MVG,
Eggie
Martijn vdK (2018-10-24 06:51:11+00:00): Hoi Eggie, dit is mijn buurt waar ik al 20-30 jaar woon. Ik gebruik streetcomplete om punten in te vullen. Persoonlijk vindt ik het gebied niet groot, maar zal kijken of ik kleinere changesets kan produceren op een of andere manier.

Mvg Martijn
Martijn vdK (2018-10-24 06:53:26+00:00): Note..... Had me niet gerealiseerd dat schiphol-rijk ook in deze changeset zat. Zal s kijken hoe ik dat kan aanpassen in streetcomplete
eggie (2018-10-24 07:08:55+00:00): Oke Martijn .. bedankt voor je reactie.. succes verder
Basstoelpel (2019-02-22 17:31:30+00:00): Do you have any clue about power towers tagging? For me, it looks like you added just all possible options no matter whether correct or not for towers like node 6008628463 and all others in the same line.
ilasolthah (2019-02-23 13:08:27+00:00): For electronic pylons I edit them according to my knowledge and I introduce only the information according to what I see such as color, type of structure, type of transport, etc..
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:41:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:26:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:25:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
IgorEliezer (2018-10-25 22:22:51+00:00): Olá tudo bem,

Quanto a esta alteração, havia razão para deletar a localidade para inserir de novo? O histórico da antiga é perdido desse jeito.
ygorre (2018-10-25 22:33:39+00:00): Boa noite,

O que aconteceu nesse caso é que eu acabei inserindo um ponto duplicado (não vi que já tinha o "hamlet"). Apaguei o ponto errado, pelo visto. Sinto muito.