piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-05-09 21:10:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
iriman (2019-03-25 12:13:53+00:00): سلام. اینکه راههای متصل به میدان زنبق را لینک کرده‌اید درست نیست. صفحهٔ ویکی این مورد را  به‌روشنی بیان کرده که اگر یک راه به‌صورت فیزیکی از خود فلکه مجزا بشه میتونه لینک باشه. این راه‌ها مسیر طبیعی خودشون رو به فلکه طی کردن.

سایر ویرایش لینکها هم بحث‌برانگیز هستن. خوشحال میشم دلایل تغییرات در لینک‌ها رو بفرمایید.
PictoFX (2019-03-25 12:37:25+00:00): سلام مجدد
همونطور که در مورد قبلی اشاره کردم این اشتباه برداشت من از لینک ها بود.
ممنون بابت ارسال لینک ویکی. در ویرایش های بعدی حتما رعایت میکنم
GinaroZ (2019-03-24 23:57:55+00:00): Given Busby is a village, West Busby is surely not a village as well...
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-03-25 02:28:25+00:00): You're right, west busby makes much more sense marked as hamlet or something like that
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-03-25 08:23:39+00:00): Ok fixed it
pangoSE (2019-11-04 12:25:01+00:00): Hej!
Relationen 8710463 är trasig efter att du mappat. Kan du fixa den själv eller vill du att jag gör det?
Är det inte dags för sig att byta till JOSM där du automatisk bliver varnad om du råkar ha sönder MPerna?
Mvh
pangoSE
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 10:51:02+00:00): prima gedaan.
viloan (2019-03-24 07:14:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
canfe (2019-03-29 14:57:30+00:00): 
Corretto orari di apertura.
Consiglio di usare per editarli
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-03-24 20:37:32+00:00): Hi Cajo Gonçalves, the address for the website you added to the point of interest in this changeset is invalid | Ola Cajo Gonçalves, o endereço do site que você adicionou ao ponto de interesse neste conjunto de alterações é inválido
4004 (2019-04-15 00:05:19+00:00): здравствуйте,
то что это "студия ногтевого дизайна" уже описано категорией обьекта, оставил имя
chnav (2019-06-29 09:09:34+00:00): Вам надо было добавить отдельную точку для ломбарда, а не менять весь магазин. Или там нет ТД Эра ?
gscholz (2019-03-26 05:32:50+00:00): Hi,
your last changesets in this region have created several OSM errors regarding duplicate nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.83532&lat=-13.98719&zoom=13&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

Kind Regards
Guido
coolbook (2019-03-24 08:37:45+00:00): 這個更變錯了，請幫忙復原此更變，謝謝。
Supaplex (2019-03-24 09:53:55+00:00): fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68465797
Frans S (2019-03-26 16:34:35+00:00): Hi, I was reviewing some work and was looking at this changeset. When I ran the validation tool, lots of errors, warnings (23) non squared buildings ( 64) shows up.  I presume you did here a mapping job. You are mapping in JOSM so you have the validation tool at hand. Please run this before uploading a task and solve the obvious errors and square your building (don't you use the building tool ?) 
Best regards
Frans
Frans S (2019-03-26 16:40:31+00:00): Please open this changeset again with JOSM and correct reported issues after running the validation tool
Best regards
hbogner (2019-06-11 19:35:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/659660901 does NOT exist
Badojo (2019-06-11 19:37:51+00:00): I added it as a highway-proposed, but user ***juggernaut*** changed it highway-construction, so I assumed he was correct.
Hjart (2019-03-24 09:50:59+00:00): Ruten ser ikke ud til at være komplet kortlagt?
mbudde (2019-03-24 10:53:03+00:00): Henviser du til hullet omkring Tagenvej? Der er stykker af ruten som endnu ikke er bygget. Det ser ud til at være planen at der skal laves en cykelsti gennem Mjølnerparken.
kubahahaha (2021-11-03 13:47:17+00:00): Ta ulica naprawdę nazywa się gminna, czy to droga gminna?
piotrS (2021-11-03 14:25:53+00:00): to nie moja zmiana, zapytaj autora "kryniczan?"
Dawid2849 (2021-11-03 14:29:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62526185

Name do skasowania, highway:category:pl=4 do dodania.
kubahahaha (2021-11-03 14:54:43+00:00): Przepraszam za pomyłkę. Już przetagowałem.
Frans S (2019-03-29 09:58:09+00:00): Hi, The instructions ask for mapping buildings. Just mapping a residential area is not enough. You mapped highways with a unclassified tag.  Path or track should be better. Please connect nodes of highways always to eachother. Never connect highway nodes to the node of a residential area. This is wrong and gives an error.
Thank you for mapping
Best regards
didier2020 (2019-03-25 17:56:41+00:00): hi,
there is a lot off mistakes in your changesets like :
 - adding tags building for all way and nodes in larges area.
 - deleting tags highway for several roads.

ask for help if you just want to add
the tag building on closed way with only the tag area=yes
Sanniu (2019-03-26 13:48:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549131502 - if it's in construction, please tag as highway=construction construction=residential, now it's ambigious
tuxayo (2020-02-11 02:25:43+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce que la poste à vraiment fermée où est-ce une erreur?
tuxayo (2020-02-11 02:25:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1799284137/history
tuxayo (2020-02-19 20:37:37+00:00): Confirmé sur le terrain, plus de poste mais les 2 boites aux lettre sont encore là devant.
RicoElectrico (2019-03-26 13:37:25+00:00): Organizacja studencka prowadzi fast food? ;-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6357803847
FulanoHerminio (2019-03-25 14:21:19+00:00): Olá Jose, hope you're doing fine. Can you stick to the "name is the name only" and "on the ground" rules of the guidelines and revise your multiple CS in this zone of your Quinta and environment accordingly? We have to stick to public road and relation names to create a quality map for all. Please check the following thread for details and discussion: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65772
FulanoHerminio (2019-03-26 16:42:58+00:00): We all prefer to have a bus stop just in front of our house. But at the location there is none. :)
Supaplex (2019-03-24 16:12:07+00:00): Spam
mavl (2019-03-24 12:45:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вероятно, случайно этот пакет правок удалил правильные теги alt_name. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
Noro Hibu (2019-03-24 12:46:46+00:00): В ОКТМО уже изменения внесены, поэтому и удалил.
mavl (2019-03-24 12:53:44+00:00): Я в курсе про ОКТМО, но административное деление в OSM это не отражение ОКТМО. "Голышмановский район" никуда не исчез. Исчез "Голышмановский муниципальный район", который стал городским округом.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68221696
user_3022894 (2020-09-16 20:27:33+00:00): Hi sokka0,
nur eine kurze Frage habe ich: Bist du dir sicher, dass diese Container hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4010579024/history im Untergrund liegen?
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:11:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:37:35+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:37:57+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:38:13+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
berndw (2019-03-24 13:33:52+00:00): Hallo GeorgU

Die Hausnummer allein bringt nichts, es sollte auch die Straße, PLZ und Ort erfasst werden
GeorgU (2019-03-24 13:41:30+00:00): Stimmt wohl. In StreetComplete wurde aber nur die Frage gestellt "Welche Hausnummer hat dieses Haus" - daher meine zu kurze Eingabe. Es ist die Waldstraße. Habe ich aber jetzt eben in der Datenbank angezeigt bekommen. Haben Sie das schon korrigiert?
Muss man bei der Hausnummernabfrage immer Straße und Hausnummer in StreetComplete eingeben?
GeorgU (2019-03-24 14:07:00+00:00): Habe die Daten jetzt über die Webseite geprüft / ergänzt
berndw (2019-03-24 16:16:02+00:00): ???

Die anderen Gebäude in der Umgebung haben die wichtigsten Daten, nur dieses eine hier nicht, da ist wohl was daneben gegangen
surveyor54 (2019-03-26 11:26:35+00:00): Hallo bike-energy,

ich habe festgestellt, dass du fleißig die E-Bikeladestationen der Fa bike-energy einträgst.
Ich habe mir heute die Mühe gemacht und mir eine dieser Ladestationen in meine Nähe angeschaut.
Dabei ist mir folgendes aufgefallen:
1.) Die Koordinaten sind falsch, woher hast du sie?

2.) Der Name der Ladestation ist nicht "bike-energy Ladestation", eigentlich hat sie gar keinen.

3.) Betreiber ist doch eigentlich die Fa. bike-energy u. nicht "Bürgerhaus".

4. Adressen habe eigentlich nur Gebäude, Ladestationen normalerweise nicht.

Beim Tagging der Ladestationen sollte man sich doch etwas an die Vorgaben des OSM-Wikis halten.

Da du hier höchstwahrscheinlich lagemäßig falsche POI's einträgst sollen diese von dir örtlich überprüft oder wieder gelöscht werden.
Woher hast du die Koordinaten, hat jemand das Urheberrecht an den Werten?

Viele Grüße

surveyor54
BCNorwich (2019-03-24 14:42:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It might be better to survey properly or wait for good aerial imagery before adding to the estate. I think you have the housing block wrong and at least one street name. A building=yes tag even with a post code is pretty meaningless.

Regards Bernard.
user_5173844 (2019-03-24 15:40:42+00:00): Bernard, I believe it was me who added building nodes with postcodes (from CodePoint Open). I plan surveying this and neighbouring areas myself, so if there are any errors I'll be happy to correct them.

Skidds19, welcome to OSM and keep up a good work. As Bernard said, there is nothing better than a proper survey. Take a GPX trace, video recording and plenty of notes (I usually record myself reading out house numbers, street or POI names etc).
Skidds19 (2019-03-24 16:10:25+00:00): Hi Bernard and ndrw6, thank you for the comments I did use google maps to trace the estate as far as I’m aware the housing block is correct and street names as I live in that specific area. Is there anything else that I need to do?

Thanks
user_5173844 (2019-03-24 16:28:17+00:00): Unfortunately, we are not allowed to use google maps, or indeed any other copyrighted sources without an explicit permission (license) from their owners. In practice, that means all your work has to be reverted. Sorry about that.

If there is anything you've added based on your local knowledge or a survey, it can be re-added afterwards.
user_5173844 (2019-03-24 16:38:15+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68476947.
Skidds19 (2019-03-24 16:38:49+00:00): Okay thank you for the heads up, I will gps track it later this afternoon and update the map, all of the information is my knowledge as I’ve lived here for over 2 years.
waldhans (2019-03-26 12:40:24+00:00): Du hast einen review angefordert, ich möchte dir hier informell antworten.

Deine Namenänderung ist korrekt, so auch im ALKIS eingetragen.

Und den Poller in der Klosterstraße habe ich gelöscht.
abakus_uploader (2019-03-24 23:30:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
thepriben (2019-03-27 07:18:06+00:00): Merci pour l'ajout. Les nouvelles voies dans cette zone ne sont pas encore officiellement nommées. ll y en a une parmi elles qui sera dédiée à Arnaud Beltrame. https://c.leprogres.fr/ain-01-edition-plaine-de-l-ain-cotiere/2018/03/29/montluel-le-maire-veut-donner-le-nom-du-colonel-beltrame-a-une-rue
mavl (2019-05-09 21:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Chalcroft (2020-03-23 17:40:52+00:00): Moin, ich konnte einen (vielleicht zwei?) deiner Bäche im Schimmerwald identifizieren und sie erweitern, zum Beispiel der Blaubach.

Grüße
Chalcroft (2020-03-23 17:43:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82533898
Trevor_1 (2019-03-24 13:33:39+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-92.15003&lat=14.84072&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:38:29+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:38:46+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
maraf24 (2019-04-01 09:42:50+00:00): Cukiernia, Kwiaciarnia, Solarium - wszystkie te nazwy znajdują się na szyldach.
S.R. Jaworscy to jest operator.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:39:07+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
maraf24 (2019-03-25 13:13:01+00:00): Droga jest ok, choć nieco wąska. Stan nawierzchni można umieścić  w innych tagach, ale nie jest tam tragicznie.
Michał Pławsiuk (2019-03-25 13:16:02+00:00): @maraf24 a da sa się jakoś oznaczyć tą drogę, żeby nie była domyślnie wybierana przez nawigacje? Wszystkie jakie testowałem (Yanosik, MagicErth) bazujące na OSM, traktują ją równoważnie jak Jabłeczną i Orzechową, chociaż w moim mniemaniu nie nadaje się na tranzyt ;)
maraf24 (2019-03-25 14:22:28+00:00): Jest ustawiona jako residential, czyli droga nie zalecana do tranzytu. Reszta zależy od nawigacji. 
Jest to droga publiczna i np. wg mnie jak najbardziej nadaje się jako wyjazd z osiedla, sam zresztą ją często tak wykorzystuję, gdyż na jej wlocie w Borowską nie ma świateł. Ich brak to może być dodatkowy powód wybierania jej przez nawigację.
Rozważ dodanie smoothness ew. lanes=1, jeśli gdzieś dwa samochody nie mogą się wyminać bez zatrzymania.
hu9o (2019-03-28 21:53:23+00:00): Salut David, t'es sur qu'on ne peux mettre que 3 vélo ? Pour info on indique "Le nombre de vélos maximum pouvant y être rangés". Donc  3 arceaux = 6 vélos. Salud!
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:39:28+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:39:46+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:50:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:54:23+00:00): Dag hjkuijf,
Gebouwen worden rechtstreeks geîmporteerd uit de bAG van het kadaster.
De aanvulling met de naam van de sporthal is een goede aanvulling van de kaart.
Samen met het gebouw wordt ook een adresnode geîmporteerd van uit het Kadaster. Het adres nog een keeer op het gebouw taggen is dus overbodig.
maraf24 (2019-04-01 09:33:26+00:00): Jaki jest powód usunięcia nazwy sklepu?
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:57:17+00:00): goede verbeteringen van de kaart.
veel plezier met verder mappen
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:40:00+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:40:16+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
Supaplex (2019-03-24 16:08:33+00:00): please use gate or something else
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:15:20+00:00): Hallo Tim,

Je zet nog al wat persoonlijke informatie op de kaart. Dat is niet de bedoeling !
OpenStreetMap is een serieuze zaak.
Echte aanvullingen en verbeteringen zijn natuurlijk van harte welkom.
Realiseer je ook dat wereldwijd jouw persoonlijke dingen voor iedereen zichtbaar zijn.

Je bijdragen worden dan ook weer verwijderd.
andrewwiseman (2019-04-02 15:55:03+00:00): Hi Ianp5a, thanks for mapping for landslide risk. I’ve noticed you’ve been adding a lot of unclassified roads that would be more appropriately classified as paths or tracks (way 675029352) and in some cases would be better to not map (way 675793933). You can find more information about classifying roads in Uganda here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines.
viloan (2019-03-24 14:19:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:40:36+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:34:21+00:00): STOP onmiddellijk met het vernielen van de kaart !!
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:41:04+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:46:35+00:00): Mocht je zo doorgaan dan wordt je account geblokkeerd.
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:46:49+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
Timp_2002 (2019-03-24 14:49:08+00:00): waarom wordt ''hier woont Tim'' weggehaald?
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 15:09:04+00:00): Prive aantekeningen horen niet thuis op de kaart.
Realiseer je dat OpenStreetMap een serieuze zaak is. Dat vele toepassingen (oa navigatie-apps) gebruik maken van onze open source database.
In de wiki kun je meer lezen over het project en hoe we dingen op de kaart zetten.
Als je een serieuze bijdrage wilt leveren ben je van harte welkom, maar probeer je eerst in te lezen en maak dan ook goede bijdragen om de kaart verder te verbeteren.
Als er vragen zijn kun je mij ook een PB sturen.
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 15:11:09+00:00): Ook op het forum kun je terecht met vragen:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Dimacn (2019-03-24 18:02:56+00:00): Пожалуйста не дублируйте своё судно по десять раз. Все ваши изменения будут отменены.
Leo Slager (2019-03-24 14:58:27+00:00): Privé informatie hoort niet op de kaart.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mueschel (2019-03-25 19:02:24+00:00): Hi,
you introduced a new tag "addr:nocity=yes" and used it more than 6000 times. What does it mean?

Jan
user_5093788 (2019-03-26 18:27:06+00:00): Short answer:
same as addr:nostreet, only that it's city instead of street.

Long answer:
In Missouri, USA cities are just a group of parcels that incorporated into a city.  There are a lot of addresses that do not have a city.  These are generally referred to as unincorporated parcels.

Unincorporated lots do not officially have a city for their mailing address.  The USPS suggests a city based on zip code, but that's just for redundancy to make it easier for them to sort.  If you go by this, then there would only be one city per zip code.

addr:nocity addresses this the same way addr:nostreet addresses the issue of a parcel not having a street (places that address in blocks instead of by what street the parcel is on).  This makes it clear that the omission of addr:city is not a mistake.  Hopefully people won't add a addr:city to an address with addr:nocity, but as long as they don't delete the addr:nocity, it will serve it's purpose.

The tiger imported city boundaries are fairly inaccurate, Using addr:nocity helps when making adjustments to those boundaries.  The ideal solution would be to fix the city boundries to the correct locations (which would need a lot of work with references).  Then switch to using post code boundries instead of just adding post codes to addresses (again a lot of work with references), and adding a default postal city to the post code boundries.  Then leave off post codes and cities for address points.

The quickest and easiest way to get addresses into OSM (there are about 160,000 addresses in just Saint Charles County, Missouri, most of which were not in OSM).  My current goal is to get the addresses into OSM so navigation mostly works.  I fix some of the city boundries as I go, but most will have to wait until after.  Then when going though to fix city boundries, it should be quick as the address will state whether or not they are actually in the city.  Third task would be to work getting a good useage for post code boundries with postal cities added.  Then it would be possible to delete addr:city addr:postcode and addr:nocity from address nodes, leaving them to inherit the data from the boundries they are in.
mueschel (2019-03-26 18:55:06+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the explanation, both nocity and nostreet are not documented in the Wiki - could you do that, so that others don't have to search / ask for explanation?

Thanks
user_5093788 (2019-03-28 16:22:22+00:00): As I can't find the source of where I got addr:nostreet (I believe it was the wiki, but now I do not see it anywhere, even with searching), and it is only used about 2500 times, I'm going to go back to putting the unincorporated info in a note for the address points.
SHARCRASH (2019-03-24 18:42:50+00:00): Hello, welcome!

Please read my profile info and read my short beginner's note guideline. It's important. You cannot use some tags as you may fit yourself alone. There is a general consensus adopted by OSM contributors so that the map has a minimum of logic and common ground. I'll let you guess which tags i'm talking about... When you have more time, i heavily recommend you to read OSM's beginner page in the help section. Thanks for your understanding! :) 

By the way, are the fences near the Schiessentümpel and closing some ways still there?
rab (2019-04-02 18:04:00+00:00): This large polygons will soon share nodes with all kind of other features. Future editing will be very complicated. At the moment I can see no use but lots of potential problems.
rab (2019-04-07 08:54:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6378994998

Please fix it