piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mazda05 (2022-12-22 05:15:49+00:00): «NOI» IATA code assigned to Novorossiysk Airport in Novorossiysk, not in Krymsk at Krymsk Military Air Base. Now the airport in Novorossiysk is dismantled in the 1990s and built up by the residential sector. He was located here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233205723. The historical object for this disused:*=* or similar ones has not yet been created. If created, it will be possible to add old_iata code «NOI» for him
Jan Olieslagers (2022-12-22 05:19:44+00:00): Are you sure? The IATA web page explicitly mentions "Krymska"!
You searched for "NOI"
City Name 	Location Name 	3-letter location code
Novorossiysk 	Krymska 	NOI
Mazda05 (2022-12-22 06:34:36+00:00): I'm completely sure. Firstly, Air Base named as «Krymsk» (Крымск), not as «Krymska» (Крымска) and never named that. Secondly, IATA appoints codes to airports, and not to military airbases, and the air base in Krymsk did not accept civilian aircraft on an ongoing basis (only emergency). Thirdly, the Krymsk Military Air Base was never named «Novorossiysk». Fourth, Krymsk was named as Krymskaya (not Krymska) until 1958, while Novorossiysk Airport was opened in 1969, so theoretically the location couldn't have been called as Krymska in 1969, even if the IATA code was assigned in 1969
Jan Olieslagers (2022-12-22 06:43:48+00:00): I can only verify your second point, and you have it totally wrong. There are plenty of military air bases that have iata codes assigned.
Mazda05 (2022-12-22 07:06:48+00:00): Military air bases that have never accepted civilian aircraft or military air bases that were previously airports / Mixed (civilian airport & military airbase) airfields? In this case, this is important. What exactly do you can't verify? The fact that the Krymsk Air Base was never named «Krymska»? What previously existed Novorossiysk Airport, which was assigned the NOI IATA code?
Jan Olieslagers (2022-12-22 07:11:03+00:00): I think Aviano Air Base is a strong example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviano_Air_Base
Mazda05 (2022-12-22 08:00:13+00:00): https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=AVB

Location Name = «Air Base»

Not Aviano, Avianoa, Roveredo in Piano, Pordenone or something else.

Firstly, «Krymska» isn't a «Krymsk». Secondly, airfield in Krymsk never named as «Novorossiysk».

https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=RMS


https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=DCI


https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=DWR


https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=SWU


https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=LWR


https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=XRH


https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=SSN


https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=MSH


https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=OSN


https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=OAH
CorruptComputer (2022-12-22 02:29:06+00:00): Hey there welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions!

Just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that this changeset spans half the planet. This looks to be due to a change to this node in Vancouver being included in the same edit as some school buildings in Bangkok: node/10274864177

In the future please try to keep edits within the same geographic region so that it is easier for other OSM contributors to review the changes.
mueschel (2022-12-30 11:24:22+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what these ways represent? They don't use common tags.
glagios (2022-12-30 17:48:01+00:00): ΑΝΤΙΠΥΡΙΚΗ ΖΩΝΗ is the name of a zone clean fron any plant in order to delay the wild fires.
PS is water pumbing station
mueschel (2022-12-30 18:16:25+00:00): Hi,
thanks for explaining. This would be
man_made=cutline
cutline=firebreak

See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcutline
ualios (2022-12-21 09:04:07+00:00): Ciao Blackboy69, benvenuto su OSM. Probabilmente puoi verificare l'esistenza di questo serbatoio in mezzo ai campi da tennis:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466491701
Se non c'è più lo puoi anche cancellare.
Non so a cosa si riferisca "moss" ma forse è meglio con l'iniziale maiuscola...
Mannivu (2022-12-20 19:30:08+00:00): Ci sono fonti per questa proposta di rotatoria?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130277170
Pucciotrex30 (2022-12-21 07:50:20+00:00): Si, googola .
Mannivu (2022-12-21 07:53:12+00:00): Se fai delle modifiche indica la fonte. Rispondere "Google" non è una risposta. Se hai trovato dove è indicato il progetto (non solo l'idea) dammi il kink
yzal (2022-12-20 16:18:43+00:00): Dobrý deň, prečo ste prosím premiestnili značky farského úradu z budovy na bod vo vnútri budovy?
mapperue (2022-12-21 03:11:31+00:00): Dobrý deň, pri aktualizácii informácií farností som ich zmenil na "node". Mapovaných takto je viac ako 95 % úradov na Slovensku.
yzal (2022-12-21 20:23:16+00:00): Len keď budova slúži len jednému účelu, nemajú sa informácie dávať na "node" ale priamo na budovu. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Jeden_prvek_re%C3%A1ln%C3%A9ho_sv%C4%9Bta,_jeden_prvek_v_OSM
A prehadzovať značky z budovy na node len preto, že je takto tagovaných 95% úradov je podľa mňa nezmysel.
mapperue (2022-12-21 20:57:13+00:00): Vďaka za usmernenie. Tento dvojitý spôsob mapovania je na Slovensku dosť častý.
Napravím to a vrátim tieto moje zmeny.
aTarom (2022-12-20 14:53:15+00:00): Hola DeustoTech OSM,
En este changeset figura "review_requested"="yes"
Este volcado de datos lo tiene que revisar algún otro usuario? No he encontrado nada en la wiki de importaciones.

Antes de corregir te comento lo siguiente por si llegase a interferir en tu flujo de trabajo :
En
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5056308378/history
no encuentro la calle "Telesforo Aranzadi kalea"
En
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5056308381/history
la clave "whellchair" es "wheelchair"
y en general
creo que
"ramp"="yes"+"ramp_access="limited"
probablemente sea
"ramp"="limited"

PD: Para cualquier duda o consejo de usuarios más experimentados que yo tienes los canales de la comunidad en el canal de Telegram
@OSMes
ó
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51

Saludos y gracias por editar
Bienson (2022-12-20 18:05:39+00:00): Da du den Namen gelöscht hast, aber amenity=school beibehalten hast - wurde der Name der Schule geändert? Oder steht dieses Gebäude leer? Dann stimmt aber auch amenity=school nicht mehr.
Plinius Meterson (2023-01-06 16:57:42+00:00): Das Gebäude steht leer, seit das Abendgymnasium Dortmund von dort zum ehem. Hauptschulgebäude am Westpark umgezogen ist. Es steht noch nicht fest, ob hier eine neue Kita gebaut wird oder eine andere Schule dort einzieht. Das Gebäude ist weiterhin ein voll möbliertes Schulgebäude, jedoch nicht in Benutzung. amenity=school kann also so lange erstmal gelöscht werden - ich ändere dies.
Jakka (2022-12-20 08:51:35+00:00): is deze gepland / aangelegd ?
dan beter highway=proposed / construction
NorthCrab (2022-12-20 12:42:31+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap!
Tak ustawiony gate blokuje przejazd na ul. Zdzisława P., Sugeruję przesunięcie go na rzeczywistą lokację - https://i.imgur.com/oLQZFPo.png. Proponuje także dodanie tagów dostępu np. private aby było jasne kto ma tutaj dostęp. Pozdrawiam!
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-20 08:21:54+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=45.346668%2C-93.132606%2C16.67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130278556
oba510 (2023-01-04 01:25:45+00:00): Fyi I passed by here today and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24221450 isn't actually a Wells Fargo.  It's always a good idea to verify notes left by others.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-20 08:35:01+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=45.343801%2C-93.134636%2C15.81
PT-53 (2022-12-20 10:23:55+00:00): Hallo  BAUR Immobilien,Willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast an diesem Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105672566/history
die Merkmale
- name=BAUR Immobilien GmbH
- website=https://www.baur-immobilien.de/immobilienmakler-biberach
eingetragen.
Da das Gebäude - nebem Deinem Immobilienbüro - sicher auch noch anderweitig genutzt wird, wäre es besser für Deine Firma - innerhalb des Gebäudeumrißes - einen separaten, neuen Knoten anzulegen und dort die Firmendaten einzutragen (incl. Firmenadresse).
Auch sollte der eigentliche Firmenzweck noch ergänzt werden. Das wäre
- office=estate_agent
Wiki:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Destate_agent

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Grüße vom Fuße des Bussen

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-12-20 10:31:19+00:00): Hallo BAUR Immobilien,
wie ich erst jetzt gesehen habe, hast Du in Biberach an 5 Gebäuden Deinen Namen eingetragen. Da das wohl keine 5 Immobilenbüros sein werden, handelt es sich offensichtlich um Immobilien die von Euch zum Verkauf angeboten werden. Das ist nicht akzeptabel. OSM ist keine Werbeplattform!

Ich werde alle Deine Änderungen wieder löschen.

Bitte unterlasse künftig solche Einträge. Ich müßte sonst eine Sperre gegen Dich beantragen.

Grüße
PT-53 (2022-12-20 10:37:37+00:00): Hallo BAUR Immobilien, 
die Einträge waren ja nicht alle in Biberach. Da habe ich leider gepennt. Sorry

Bitte überarbeite Eure Standorte noch wie in meinem ersten Post beschrieben.

Grüße
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-20 08:39:06+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=45.345145%2C-93.126391%2C17.50
surveyor54 (2023-01-10 08:53:42+00:00): Hallo Digital Ranger Oberallgäu,

den Link der neue entwickelten Homepage sollte man in die Relation und nicht in die Mitglieder der Relation eintragen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14900486

Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2023-01-16 22:22:13+00:00): Hi, es wäre schön, wenn du es korrigieren, oder dich zumindest einmal melden würdest.

Gruß
surveyor54
Digital Ranger Oberallgäu (2023-01-17 06:58:33+00:00): Hi Surveyor54,
ich habe die Adresse der Webside als Feld eingetragen. Als Relation macht das für mich keinen Sinn, es ist nicht als Objekttyp gedacht.
Gruß Digital Ranger Oberallgäu
surveyor54 (2023-01-17 16:05:10+00:00): Hi,
schön, dass du dich meldest.

Die drei Flächen des NSG sind in einer Relation vom Typ Boundary zusammengefasst.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14900486

Das Tagging wird , bis auf wenige Ausnahmen, in die Relation eingetragen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen

Wenn du möchtest, kann ich das für dich übernehmen.
Melde dich.

Gruß
surveyor54
Digital Ranger Oberallgäu (2023-01-19 07:08:45+00:00): Hi surveyor54,
klar, dann wäre es super wenn du es eintragen könntest.
Grüße Digital Ranger Oberallgäu
surveyor54 (2023-01-19 07:41:31+00:00): Erledigt !  👍

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14900486
adiatmad (2022-12-20 15:18:07+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!
What object do you want to map?
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10275188523)
NorthCrab (2022-12-20 12:40:03+00:00): Witaj na OpenStreetMap! Uważam że ten opis "na ścianie" jest zbyt ogólny. Może warto by go trochę usprawnić? Np. "obok pokoju ...", albo "przy wejściu..." :P Pozdrawiam!
abakus_uploader (2022-12-20 23:32:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2022-12-20 09:20:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Het is kennelijk geen eenrichtingsverkeer (meer) ?
Dan kun je ook de uitzondering voor tweewielers verwijderen
Dus de regel oneway:bicycle=no  kan weg. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_11609320 (2022-12-20 09:15:47+00:00): STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE - SHC
DIVISION 1. STATE HIGHWAYS [50 - 897] ( Division 1 enacted by Stats. 1935, Ch. 29. )
CHAPTER 2. The State Highway System [230 - 635] ( Chapter 2 enacted by Stats. 1935, Ch. 29. )

ARTICLE 3. The State Highway Routes [300 - 635] ( Article 3 repealed and added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 385. )

366.
(a) Route 66 is from:

(1) Route 210 near San Dimas to the eastern city limit of the City of Pomona.

(2) The eastern city limit of the City of Rialto to Route 215 in San Bernardino.

(b) The relinquished former portions of Route 66 within the city limits of the Cities of Claremont, Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, and Upland are not state highways and are not eligible for adoption under Section 81
loffa (2022-12-20 23:11:16+00:00): Hej,

För närvarande pågår det en process mellan PostNord (som du verkar vara i från baserat på namnet) och det svenska OSM Communityt. Vi i community har haft problem med kvalitén på den data som PostNord har lagt till och att de regler som finns för redigeringar inte efterföljs. Nuvarande status skall vara att all editering från PostNord skall upphöra tills vidare utbildning och dialog sker med oss andra i communityt.
Se:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/postnord-och-osm/6367/1

Din kommentar på denna ändring är en indikation på den låga kvalité som tidigare har skapat problem vid redigeringar av PostNord.

Föreslår att du avbryter den nuvarande redigeringen alternativt höjer kvalitén i meddelanden och redigeringar för att inte riskera avstängning.
Om du nu inte jobbar på PostNord men ändå har det i namnet bör ändå kvalitén öka något, kanske lite bättre kommentarer då de inte beskriver vad som gjorts. Många av dina tidigare ändringar är i stil med "kopplat" etc. men inte vad eller varför.
Msiipola (2022-12-21 08:01:29+00:00): Jag har skickat PM till dig i vilket framgår tidigare beslut att PostNord inte får fortsätta sin verksamhet på OSM tillsvidare. Vilket innebär att du inte får ändra i OSM om du gör det på uppdrag av PostNord.
bxl-forever (2022-12-20 10:00:02+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding this house.  I fixed the building outline: in the Brussels-Capital Region we use correct building outlines provided by UrbIS.
In the online editor you can find this layer by scrolling down to UrbisAdm FR/NL on the list of backgrounds.  Please never trace buildings on aerial imagery because that would make buildings have all sorts of funny shapes.
Hope this helps.

(I fixed this one.)
Alexosterrieth (2022-12-20 10:18:15+00:00): Which editor do you use? I can't seem to find it in the online editor...
Alexosterrieth (2022-12-20 10:44:22+00:00): Hi, please ignore my previous question, I have found it. I'm trying to learn how to properly edit OSM, so please excuse me for the previous mistakes I have made.
Владимир К (2022-12-21 04:08:53+00:00): Вандализм, откатываю
mtmail (2022-12-29 15:33:20+00:00): Is name=<NULL> caused by an automated script?
Muad_Dib (2022-12-30 02:24:19+00:00): No, I copied data from shp. Just forgot to remove this attribute. Sorry. I've already fixed it.
aTarom (2022-12-20 13:36:30+00:00): Hello, Đuro Jiří, can you help me with this tag:

"charging_station_basex0"="motorcar"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10275236049/history

some type of charger or connector?

Greetings and thanks for editing
Đuro Jiří (2022-12-21 13:23:18+00:00): Upřímně, nerozumím otázce. Smazal jsem ty dvě nabíjecí stanice pro elektromobily a přidal jsem je tam znovu. 
Teď je to už v pořádku?
aTarom (2022-12-21 13:51:33+00:00): I guess so, I was just asking if you knew the meaning of the tag.
"charging_station_basex0"="motorcar"
I assume it was a mistake, thank you for correcting it.
Cheers
user_11609320 (2022-12-20 09:34:10+00:00): STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE - SHC
DIVISION 1. STATE HIGHWAYS [50 - 897] ( Division 1 enacted by Stats. 1935, Ch. 29. )
CHAPTER 2. The State Highway System [230 - 635] ( Chapter 2 enacted by Stats. 1935, Ch. 29. )

ARTICLE 3. The State Highway Routes [300 - 635] ( Article 3 repealed and added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 385. )

366.
(a) Route 66 is from:

(1) Route 210 near San Dimas to the eastern city limit of the City of Pomona.

(2) The eastern city limit of the City of Rialto to Route 215 in San Bernardino.

(b) The relinquished former portions of Route 66 within the city limits of the Cities of Claremont, Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, and Upland are not state highways and are not eligible for adoption under Section 81
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-20 09:36:02+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=52.682174%2C0.966014%2C17.82
user_12500175 (2022-12-20 10:17:04+00:00): Hallo,
ich hatte ja schon deine andere Bearbeitung kommentiert.
Wenn du den Wanderweg "Esterholz" eintragen willst müßten die einzelnen Abschnitte in einer Relation zusammengefast werden.
ich bin nicht der Relationsprofi. 
Aber ich hatte ja schon im Forum einen Thread dazu eröffnert. wenn du dich da mit deinen OSM Kontodaten anmeldest kannst du mit diskutieren und da wird dir auch geholfen. Denn so wird der Wanderweg nicht als solcher im OSM auftauchen.
Hier nochmals der Thread im Forum 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wanderwegspezialisten-gefragt/6999

Gruß
Danfost
ITRECKS (2023-02-01 15:34:59+00:00): Sorry, Anfängerfehler: Der Name des Gässchens rührt von dem Harzburger Jugendliteraturpreis „Harzburger Eselsohr" her. Scheinbar kann man einmal gemachte Änderungskommentare nicht editieren?!
literan (2022-12-20 17:43:52+00:00): приветствую!
тротуары вдоль дворовых проездов обычно не рисуют - потому что в дворовых хонах и так пешеход пользуется преимуществом, и она вся один большой тротуар ,по сути. Получается кривой пешеходный роутинг (проезд можно пересечь в любом месте, а роутер потащит в обход, туда, где есть подсоединение линии тротуара к проезду)

отдельные дорожки, конечно, рисуют.
literan (2022-12-20 17:46:33+00:00): и еще, как здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123578077#map=19/55.68732/37.57858 подсоединять площадные объекты (газон) к линиям дорог топологически неверно. Линии дорог проводятся по их центру, получается, что у вас половина дороги занята газоном. Лучше, если не хочется тщательно рисовать газон, вообще их не рисовать
Andreyka! (2022-12-20 19:20:42+00:00): Доброго времени суток! Благодарю за комментарий. Я только начал вносить правки ))) буду иметь в виду. 👍
VLD549 (2023-05-16 15:18:42+00:00): Hi, could you indicate which source was used for this? I can't determine it. It looks like on the main road both north and south from  Knorringsvägen  is Norrbergsvägen . That wouldn't make much sense.
Thank you.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-05-17 07:15:47+00:00): I have reverted the changeset where the wrong name was added.
ivanbranco (2022-12-29 10:56:51+00:00): Hi shashish,

I noticed you changed this node name:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3722669780/history
so I guess you have local knowledge. Do you know what kind of place it is? Now it's tagged as place=yes, which is quite generic.

Thanks :)
shashish (2022-12-30 04:20:14+00:00): Yes, sometime it is difficult to categorise local places into OSM's tagging guideline.
AndersAndersson (2023-01-07 01:08:45+00:00): Hello
When you changed name of the tunnel from Dalporten to Kopparbergsvägen, did you consider anything about why someone added the name Dalporten?

Some of you from Microsoft asks before overwriting. But apparently not everyone. When you do this large scale changes on a community project, you should definitively ask the community before removing allready added content.
borovac (2023-01-07 06:56:23+00:00): Hello Anders,
I added the name from the street before and after tunnel, it is possible that I accidentally selected that part.
Thanks for the point on this oversight of mine, I will pay more attention to things like this in the future.
I further checked the name information and found it to be Dalporten on Mapillary and returned that name.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2023-01-08 11:09:32+00:00): While I agree that this is an oversight on the part of the editor and that we should double-check before making the change, I strongly disagree with this way of labeling a road segment with a tunnel name.
There is a tunnel:name tag that should be used. Also, there is a variant for bridge:name

Here is the wiki documentation:
https://viki.openstreetmap.org/viki/Kei:tunnel#Hov_to_map

Also, this tag is used quite a bit on OSM
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keis/tunnel%3Aname

Would it be in the interest of the community to map all these names correctly?
AndersAndersson (2023-01-08 17:30:01+00:00): I agree and have now changed to a specific tunnel name.

My point is that every change should be an improvement.
Of course errors will be introduced, that is not the problem.
The problem (that becomes more and more common) is that survyed information is deleted because people and large companies run some scripts and find patterns that does not match some rules. And then changes or deletes the survyed information without thinking twice what that lost information actually meant. Just assuming it was an error and to lazy to look up what is actually was.

As a big company you have a larger responsibility than a random private user.

But I must also say that so far I think you (Microsoft) are doing a good job most of the times.
AndersAndersson (2023-01-08 17:31:13+00:00): I forgot to mention that the name of the tunnel was added by me 11 years ago, at that time I don't think the tunnel:name tag was invented.
tux67 (2022-12-20 10:12:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130283169
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-14 21:41:30+00:00): For such changes where roads are changed to one-way you should add a source.
eggie (2022-12-20 10:43:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-20 10:47:48+00:00): Feedback  je hebt wat toegangswegen verwijderd die teogevoegd water door de Brandweer.
Die stonden overigens op access=private en zouden niet kunnen routeren behalve voor die hulpdiensten.
Het is geen noodzaak om privewegen te verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-20 10:52:32+00:00): 'typo .. toegevoegd was door de Brandweer.' 
Wanneer die verbinding niet meer bestaat is het natuurlijk oke.
Moi70 (2022-12-20 11:02:07+00:00): Hallo, bedankt voor uw opmerking. Waar kan ik dit zien dat dit toegevoegd was door de Brandweer ? 
Met vriendelijke groet, moi
eggie (2022-12-20 11:05:43+00:00): Zie hier.. Het gaat dan om de oprit.
VRT OSM 
Veiligheid Regio Twente
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130283599

Gr eggie
Moi70 (2022-12-20 11:19:40+00:00): Dan verifieer ik de goede verbinding  even en pas het dan aan. Bedankt
maraf24 (2022-12-29 20:09:03+00:00): Nie wiem dlaczego został tutaj skasowany track, który dodałem w tym miesięcu i którym jechałem.
eggie (2022-12-20 12:48:34+00:00): Tip... 
Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het kadaster..
Die zijn precies ingemeten.
Overkappingen kun je toevoegen met building=roof layer =1 
Die staan niet in de BAG.
Luchtfoto's zijn schuin genomen en geen goede bron om gebouwen aan te passen.
De BAG klopt meestal wel.
MVG
eggie