piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-04 18:18:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9810364795

is it really named "small market"? Or it description of this shop?

What kind of shop it is? What they are selling there?
Brotfahrer (2023-01-07 09:39:00+00:00): It is a small market, but they only sell soft drinks and potatoe chips etc. So I wanted to make sure people don't expect a small supermarket.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-09 13:52:01+00:00): Would be correctly classified as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dconvenience ?

Or is it even smaller?

Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsnack would be better?
Brotfahrer (2023-01-23 18:07:20+00:00): If I have to choose one, it is the convenience shop
redd (2022-06-11 09:54:23+00:00): Hi Lepuse,
if you change something which affects Europe please choose a local language as description.
Otherwise please dont do edits which are spanning all over from china to Europe
JeroenHoek (2022-06-11 09:59:54+00:00): Usually true, but in this case the edits all seem local to Eastern Russia and China. The relation for the Far Eastern economic region crosses the date-line, which makes it look like the changeset crosses the whole world, but it doesn't. Any chance to that relation will cause changesets to look like this; it can't be helped.
MikiDi (2022-06-13 08:33:38+00:00): I can confirm that the geometry is up to date (everything marked as farmland in osm is used as farmland on the ground). I'm not entirely sure if áll of it is managed by FleurAkker though.
Dodko (2022-06-11 09:03:36+00:00): Na pošte stačilo len 
amenity=post_box
vrátiť na pôvodné
amenity=post_office
a nie vymazať poštu a založiť novú.
Tak sa stratila história objektu a zároveň chýba telefónne číslo, otvárací čas aj web stránka.

Mazať objekt len vtedy ak už prestal existovať, inak len aktualizovať značky alebo polohu.
Aj značky si najprv pozrieť na iných rovnakých objektoch, pozrieť dokumentáciu k značke na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org a až potom niečo meniť ak rozumiem čo mením.
PovilasDew (2022-06-11 16:45:44+00:00): Dėl išvažiavimo pavadinimo.

Stengiuosi pagal užsienio praktikas nurodyti vieną konkrečią gyvenvietę. Dažnu atveju, artimiausia gyvenvietė. Pvz. Nyderlanduose yra tokia praktika, kad fiziniuose ženkluose sankryžos pavadinimas nurodytas 1000 m prieš sankryžą yra pirma gyvenvietė išsukimo kryptimi. Išimtį taikau, jei artimiausia gyvenvietė ta pati tam pačiam kelyje yra keliose sankryžose, pvz. ties Šilale, Raseiniais. Gaila šiuo atveju neturim ženkluose Šilalė R, Šilalė P, Šilalė V taip kaip Danija :) Siūliau LAKD, gal atsižvelgs (nors garantijų visiškai tam nėra).

Tikslingiau naudoti exit_to=Giraitė; Užliedžiai, o name tiesiog Giraitė, juolabiau, daug kas taip ir mąsto - "Giraitės sankryža", o ne "Giraitės-Užliedžių sankryža".
ygcgjp5 (2022-06-11 17:46:39+00:00): Jo, tas visko vardinimas gaunasi gan gremėzdiškas. Šiaip paskaičius motorway_junction aprašymą OSM wiki susidaro įspūdis kad iš viso reikėtų visus pavadinimus dėt į destination žymą, nes pas mus sankryžos nei numeruojamos, nei turi oficialų suteiktą vardą (apart sugalvoto vietinių).
Tarp kitko, ar nėra Nidoje sunumeruota į Nida 1, Nida 2 ir Nida 3?
PovilasDew (2022-06-11 19:48:45+00:00): Kažkur senesnėse eismoinfo.lt versijose teko matyt, kad yra niekur nežymimi sankryžų pavadinimai: Babtų sankr., Laukuvos sankr., iš įdomesnių ties Sausine yra "Apželdinimo tresto sankr.", o ties Vieviu, "Vievio rytinė sankr.", "Vievio vakarinė sankr.". Kadangi jie (dar) niekur nežymimi, tai geriau ir nežymėt. Iš kitos pusės, kažkokio pavadinimo autostradoje vis tiek norisi ir man kažkaip cool, kad yra pavadinimas, panaudotas iš krypties rodyklės, pasąmoningai žinomas vairuotojų.

Dėl Nidos, tai nežinau kaip ten tiksliai, man būtų staigmena jei ten yra kažkoks specifinis numeravimas, būtų įdomu pamatyti foto. Nebent maišote su kilometro žymėjimu.
ygcgjp5 (2022-06-12 07:50:17+00:00): Sankryžų pavadinimai realiai naudojami tik naviguojant, o gera navigacija/žemėlapio generatorius pamatęs, jog sankryža be pavadinimo, o tik turi destination žymą, ją ir parodytų kaip orientyrą vairuotojui.
Nidoj iš ties nieko panašaus neradau nei dabartinėse nuotraukose, nei senose. Kažką būsiu sumaišęs.

O dėl eismoinfo - https://gis.eismoinfo.lt/arcgis/sharing/rest/content/items/beda1270612f4a02837ceb39729d7381/data
Visi tie pavadinimai ten, tačiau matyt ne be reikalo nebededa jų - nesistebėčiau jei čia jų vidiniai neoficialūs pavadinimai, kad būtų galima lengviau orientuotis.
DK7080BE (2022-06-11 12:49:44+00:00): Bredstrupvej ud for Asser Jensens Vej har ikke maxspeed:advisory 40; så Asser Jensensvej er vel ikke berørt af denne.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-06-12 14:25:40+00:00): Tak, jeg har fjernet det.

Men Puggårdsvej er vel maxspeed:advisory=40

For den er tagget med maxspeed:advisory=30 og på Mapillary fra 2018 ses Bredstrupvej der at være maxspeed:advisory=30, så hvis det er ændret til 40, så er  Puggårdsvej vel også?
user_5359 (2022-06-18 08:02:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068735575 (one of two objects). What is the meaning of the tag 
    Cod = IT051 (?)
    ramsar = yes (did you mean source=ramsar?)
    start_date = 11 feb 2008 (please use yyyy-mm-dd format)
    wikipedia = https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ramsar_site (our wiki isn't part of wikipedia.org use note or website)
iriman (2022-06-12 14:33:58+00:00): Hi LockOnGuy,

In Persian "میان دو حرم" is the translation of "بين الحرمين".

In Persian if you say someone I was "میان دو حرم" you will be asked "کدام حرم‌ها?" i.e. "Which shrines?".

But if you say I was at "بین الحرمین" they will say you "زیارت قبول!" i.e. "May God accept your pilgrimage!". So بین" الحرمین" in Persian language is a known name for a place in Iraq.

In Arabic it could be a name as an Iraqi user added it and we talked about it on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120182604

In English "Bayn al-Haramayn" is a name as you also see a Wikipedia article with that title.

You are translating "Bayn al-Haramayn" to "Between the two shrines" and then saying it isn't a name. "Between the two shrines" isn't a name, I agree, but "Bayn al-Haramayn" is a name for a place in Iraq.

If we go into details of each name, we find its meaning. Then we understand that name is describing something, then should we remove it?
When people use a word or some words to call something then we say it is the name of that thing.

Thanks for reading.
LockOnGuy (2022-06-12 16:50:56+00:00): iriman,     
As I told you before, a generic term or description name for an area is not ok to add as a name for an area, it must be added as a description, this is clearly explained in: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#:~:text=Do%20not%20use%20name%3D*%20if           

The name that was added was "بين الحرمين" which translated to "between the 2 mosques" or "between the 2 shrines" as you want to translate it, either way, is a descriptive name of an area, not an official name.    
The tags were:    
"name=بين الحرمين" which translates to "Between the two mosques" is a descriptive name.    
"name:fa=بين الحرمين" same as above, the persian language uses the same word for mosque as Arabic.    
"name:en=Bayn al-Haramayn" is "Between the two mosques" but written in Arabic with the English alphabet.      
"alt_name:en=Bainul Haramain" same as above.        
"alt_name:ar=بين الحضرتين; بين المشهدين" is "Between the two mosques" in Arabic but written in 2 different wording for a mosque, as the name means between the two mosques and this one means between the two shrines and between the two holy places etc. which is a descriptive term.      

You say "but Bayn al-Haramayn is a name for a place in Iraq.", but this is wrong, it is not the official name, for example in Iraq when people say "I'm going to misnaya, انا ذاهب للمسناية" or "I'm in misnaya" we know they are going or at the Safina district in Adhamya, where there is an ancient brick historic ruins called "misnaya" but we don't name the road nearby "misnaya road" cause that road has its official name in the official maps by the government/Municipality.        
        
The official name of roads in Iraq as I Shawn you previously it's a numeral type of naming, like xxx-xx which x is a number. You can add this and it would be correct, but you can not add a descriptive term of an area as a name tag.        
        
Regards.
iriman (2022-06-12 17:22:50+00:00): It seems we have no agreement on name tag. So I will only add the Persian name to loc_name:fa=*

Have a good time
LockOnGuy (2022-06-12 17:33:52+00:00): no, loc_name described in the wiki as "locally recognized name" but there is no one locally recognized one" as the local people some say "بين الحرمين" others say "بين الحضرتين" others say "بين المشهدين" others say "بين الامامين" others say "بين العباس والحسين" and many many other descriptive terms, there is no one local name everyone uses.     
to simplify things, add them all in the description tag so one particular tag is favorable.       
Regards.
iriman (2022-06-12 17:42:52+00:00): It's just for Iranians who go there or search for it. In Persian it is only known as "بین الحرمین".

Other names like
بین المشهدین
بین الحضرتین
etc
aren't common for Persian speakers. I can say that I never heard them from someone speaking Persian.
iriman (2022-06-12 17:57:33+00:00): alt_name:fa can work too, as per your suggestion, but I thought when there isn't a name:fa, existence of alt_name:fa semantically is weird.
LockOnGuy (2022-06-12 18:49:27+00:00): If you're certain that almost all Persian language speakers worldwide not just Iran call this area as that, then the tag would be loc_name:fa, I guess.          
The alt_name wiki says      
"alt_name=* is sometimes used to store multiple semicolon-separated names, but if possible it should be avoided by using other name tags listed above."          
And yes, one of the above is "loc_name" so yes, loc_name fits better actually.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:alt_name          
Regards.
iriman (2022-06-12 19:02:20+00:00): Okay, thanks
Tilia_J (2022-06-13 13:51:43+00:00): Een weg kan nooit een gebouw raken of kruisen zónder dat je "entrance= ...] toevoegt.

Ik heb het idee dat hier ook een ingang voor ondergrondse parkeergarage is. In dat laatste geval wordt het amenity=parking_entrance
iriman (2022-06-11 10:26:05+00:00): Please let me know your points on deleting my changes in this CS:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122231276
iriman (2022-06-11 10:29:26+00:00): Also this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122227217
LockOnGuy (2022-06-11 10:31:01+00:00): Hello @iriman, as described in the changeset comment. Regards.
iriman (2022-06-11 10:34:11+00:00): I have source as mentioned in the changeset.
What is your source that those places do not exist?
LockOnGuy (2022-06-11 11:38:56+00:00): Hello again @iriman, as you probably know, I'm local, I know this area, As a friendly reminder since I told you this weeks ago, please don't argue with local mappers in areas you're not familiar with, especially in another country like this case. :)     
This is not your first to argue in subjects you know nothing about, don't take it negatively, but relax, grab a cold one, and see what is okay to map and what is not. Now let's get to your edits and what is wrong with them.     
In the first link, you added a "monument", there is no monument. Then you added a POI named: "prophets Hood" (it should be spelled Hud btw), this location you marked as "prophets Hood" is just a regular place/building/masjid people use to pray when they visit the graves of loved ones in the area, people might call it that but it's incorrect. You can learn more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hud_(prophet)#Place_of_burial         
In the 2nd link, you could've at least translated what the POI says... it's a maps(dot)me user added a "bank" with his grandpa's name, as a bookmark for the location of his grandpa's grave. If you're interested in his thing, you should've at least commented on his changeset and show him how to save the private points as a bookmark in his app not to upload it to OSM, also I believe you should probably read this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MAPS.ME/Questionable_OSM_Edits  
Regards.
iriman (2022-06-11 12:26:15+00:00): I don't know why it isn't mentioned in English wikipedia. WP just isn't speaking about it. It's counted some places for tomb of prophet Hud but not talking about Wadi-us-salam!

However Wikipedia is not a reliable source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_disclaimer

If you want to reference to Wikipedia, here is the Arabic wiki:

https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/هود#قبر_هود :

"يقال أنه في مقبرة وادي السلام في النجف الأشرف بالعراق وبجواره قبور الأنبياء صالح ونوح وآدم."

Also:

https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/قائمة_مساجد_النجف

and search for:

مقام النبي هود
مقام النبي صالح
مقام الإمام المهدي


In addition to the source I mentioned in my CS, you can take a look here:

https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5578/

In my language, u and oo usually are pronounced similarly and people use them interchangeably. In the last link above you can even see "Hod"!

Among my changes there is an "entrace=yes" that you undid it too!

About that grave, we have cemetery=grave for such places. I don't know if he is significant or not as advised in OSM wiki. But from the name "مقبرة جدي..." it's probably not that significant. And this is the only case you are correct. In all other cases, you are incorrect and I'm seriously in doubt about many other places you deleted in such changesets.

I understand you may have some personal problems with some people, political issues, religions or places, otherwise why you should change the lastname "الصدر" to "Boob":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539156630/history
look at version #5 of this way. It's for the time you was "lockdownguy".

...but here in OSM we map "what is on the ground", as simple as it is...

You may live there, but you don't know much about where you live and it seems you don't want to respect local culture and local people.
LockOnGuy (2022-06-11 12:42:26+00:00): iriman, you can keep arguing just like the last time, and I'm not gonna continue replying and waisting my time if you're not learning or understanding..    
About the gate, it was part of the wrong changeset you did, that I reverted in full, the gate is the only thing not wrong in your changeset. Feel free to add the gate again, without any other wrong POIs.    
And lastly, I find your last statement is absolute disrespectful, shame, I don't know what you're talking about, that's ludicrous and absurd. You can not just accuse such things. I'm not replying to this nonsense anymore. peace.
iriman (2022-06-11 19:07:50+00:00): I didn't carefully read the cemetery=grave page, it is saying:
In areas where grave location/inscription is considered private information[1], please map only significant and notable graves. 

So actually if that grave is private, then your removal could be correct.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 12:28:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068742206/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
habi (2022-06-13 13:14:10+00:00): 'Streuli IT GmbH' nur als Name ans Gebäude zu schreiben ist zwar schon ein guter Anfang, reicht aber aus meiner Sicht noch nicht, damit ihre Firma korrekt erfasst ist.
Wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3219646 habe ich den Namen vom Gebäude entfernt und Streuli IT als Knoten hinzugefügt.
Dies im Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122325586

Ä Gruess vo Bärn,
habi
rik_ (2022-06-11 18:09:06+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

gibt es auf dem Karl-Metten-Ring eine neue Beschilderung bzw. passiert hier gerade etwas an Bauarbeiten o. Ä.? Vor Kurzem war hier noch nichts ausgeschildert, was auf `private` hingedeutet hat.

Viele Grüße

rik
StefanHRT (2022-06-11 18:27:55+00:00): Hi rik,
Da ist direkt neben dem Fußweg auf der Zufahrt ein Schild mit Privatgrundstück, Betreten verboten etc. Bin aufgrund der Beschilderung nicht rein geradelt. In ein paar Tagen sind entsprechende Fotos auf Mapillary. VG Stefan
StefanHRT (2022-06-12 10:05:23+00:00): Fotos sind noch nicht für alle verfügbar, aber hier ist das Schild zu sehen ;) https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/stefanhrt?lat=52.290454&lng=13.554966&z=17&panos=true&pKey=154509417105998&focus=photo&x=0.5646722162310859&y=0.4729548921194162&zoom=0.005169968285004323
rik_ (2022-06-12 17:52:24+00:00): Ah, alles klar. Sieht nach einem Kandidaten fürs jahreszeitliche Zuwachsen aus …
StefanHRT (2022-06-12 18:17:41+00:00): kann gut sein, außer die Eigentümer achten drauf wenn zuviele einfach unberechtigt drauf fahren
BCNorwich (2022-06-12 07:10:49+00:00): Hi, Please be careful you are duplicating many sections of highways.

Regards Bernard.
sahilister (2022-06-12 12:59:09+00:00): Hey, sorry if it's wrong but I still didn't get it.

Take for example a changeset to remove duplicate - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068814553#map=18/22.92871/71.02845 , from sat imagery there is a street there. Can you clarify the issue here?
BCNorwich (2022-06-12 14:33:24+00:00): Hi, You can't see the problem now as I've removed/corrected the offending sections. Actually, I can now see another section of highway you've inadvertently mapped. If you look at the road you refer to in your above link, open that for editing. Zoom in and pan to the next road to the east. At the crossing point of the roads you'll see just to the south an extra node that should not be there. In the previous instance, you had joined a similar node onto the next road making a short duplicate section. Here's a link to the place I'm talking about:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=1068814553#map=24/22.92934/71.02735

Regards Bernard
sahilister (2022-06-14 15:15:13+00:00): Thanks Bernard, got the issue now. Will work with better zoom to avoid these silly mistake. Cheers!
bsvka (2022-08-30 13:49:47+00:00): Hallo Schück VCR

Weshalb hast du hier die Strassen auf living_street geändert?
Das hier ist doch keine [Begegnungszone](https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begegnungszone).
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 09:44:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418452726/history has shop = bar that was added in this edit
shop=bar? Is it even a shop? Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbar was meant here?
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:31:10+00:00): -
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:30:48+00:00): -
Dodko (2022-06-11 10:39:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068751026
Po chodníku highway=footway môžu chodiť chodci, značka foot=yes sa nepoužíva.
Je tam tabuľka že je to aj pre cyklistov? Keď ste dali bicycle=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dfootway

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068751028
Ten most má naozaj názov "Lávka pri kostole"? Do značky name sa nepíšu opisné názvy.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068751027
ten koniec chodníka nie je napojený na cestu, tak navigácia ho nepoužije.
Milan Gr (2022-06-12 13:26:27+00:00): Tabuľka pre cyklistov tam nie je, ale jazdiť sa môže a aj sa reálne jazdí
Lávka pri kostole je miestny názov tejto lávky
Ďakujem za info ohľadom napojenia, chodníky na obe cesty, napojím ho...
Patr1k_P (2022-06-13 15:00:31+00:00): Troška vás upravím, podľa zákona bicykel na chodník nepatrí ak tam nie je značka ktorá to umožňuje, to že sa jazdí neznamená že to je správne.. To isté ak je cyklochodnik tak chodec tam nesmie pokiaľ to neumožňuje značka.. Takže tag pre bicykel tam byť nemá keď tam nie je značka
Milan Gr (2022-06-13 15:24:27+00:00): žiaľ, nie je tam ani značka Chodník pre chodcov, takže by nemali chodiť ani chodci? :) pokojne to upravte podľa seba... logicky som tam naviedol aj cyklistov, keďže tento chodník bežne používajú aj cyklisti....  a pokojne tam môžu chodiť aj kone :)
Patr1k_P (2022-06-13 15:32:55+00:00): Každý chodník predsa nie je označený značkou a predsa vieme že to je chodník..aj chodníky popri ceste nie sú značené, ale viete že to chodník je.... Neviem ako to vyzerá v reále, možno je to skôr cestička (path)
Milan Gr (2022-06-13 15:36:19+00:00): Keďže tu žijem a poznám situáciu, tak som to označil tak ako to reálne je...  :)
kuhni74 (2023-05-21 22:54:11+00:00): Mit Bedauern musste ich vernehmen, dass dieses bemerkenswerte Gehöft geschleift wurde. Ich hab noch 2021 einige Photos gemacht. Ich bin bei unterirdisch nicht dabei, weißt Du zufällig, wie Benutzer wolfgeist erreichbar ist?
fkv (2023-05-22 03:43:07+00:00): Indem man sich auf unterirdisch.de registriert und auf "Gespräch beginnen" klickt. Wegen der dortigen Geheimniskrämerei sind keine anderen Kontaktdaten zu erfahren.
kuhni74 (2023-05-22 07:07:51+00:00): Danke! Bist Du selbst dort Mitglied und wärst so nett was auszurichten? Oder ist er eh auch auf OSM aktiv?
fkv (2023-05-22 07:18:10+00:00): Du erweckst meine Neugier, was ich ausrichten soll, aber im Prinzip denke ich, du solltest es selber dem User mitteilen.
kuhni74 (2023-05-22 07:35:36+00:00): es geht natürlich um die eingangs erwähnten Fotos
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:30:30+00:00): -
Dodko (2022-06-11 10:46:08+00:00): Knižnicu nedávajte ako rodinný dom budova vložená v budove obchodu.
Ak je to len ako ďalší objekt v tej budove tak sa dáva ako bod.
Otváracie hodiny je dobré si vytvoriť napríklad na stránke https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
tak by ste nemali medzery pri pomlčke, nie každá aplikácia to pochopí.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:30:07+00:00): -
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:29:45+00:00): -
habi (2022-09-18 08:36:51+00:00): Do you have any more information on those ruins?
I guess they are not really names 'Ruins'...
habi (2022-09-18 08:37:01+00:00): ...named..., sorry
Anthony VH (2022-09-18 09:27:33+00:00): No, sorry, I don't have any more info. Just something I saw on a hike.
habi (2022-09-19 19:31:24+00:00): As mentioned in another changeset, a descriptive name is not needed, hence I removed it here :https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126394485
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:28:37+00:00): -
Carto'Cité (2025-06-11 09:39:39+00:00): Bonjour Tom,
J'ai vu tes contributions et les photos Panoramax que tu as prises, c'est nickel.
J'étais un peu partagé entre l'utilisation de way indépendant ou l'utilisation cycleway=track dans cette situation mais si tu préfères les way indépendants je ne touche à rien.
J'avais une question, ce passage piéton n'est plus cyclable selon moi mais tu l'as laissé en bicycles=yes :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/873429745
Est-ce que c'est une erreur ?

Sinon, si tu contribues beaucoup sur la thématique vélo je te conseille vivement de passer à JOSM avec le rendu vélo (https://gitlab.com/cartocite/MapCSS-JOSM-Bicycle) car même si au premier abord il est un peu repoussant, une fois adopté on se rend compte que ça va vraiment beaucoup beaucoup plus vite !

À ta disposition pour parler de tous ces sujets :)

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Tom Delmas (2025-06-11 19:52:09+00:00): Pour le bicycles=yes sur osm.org/way/873429745 c'est bien un oubli que je viens de corriger, merci !
Pour les pistes cyclables, j'ai effectivement tendance dessiner les way indépendantes, surtout quand les carrefours sont complexes.

Pour les photos de panoramax, n'hésite pas à utiliser le site web dédié, car je poste de nouvelles photos quand je note des changements d'infra, mais OSM ne permets pas de montrer simplement les photos les plus récentes...
Carto'Cité (2025-06-16 12:57:25+00:00): Bonjour Tom,
Merci pour ton retour et la modification !
Oui j'ai vu que tes photos Panoramax étaient utilisées pour documenter et c'est vraiment nickel. Et j'utilise les filtres de la visionneuse pour m'aider à identifier celles qui m'intéressent (utilisateur et dates).

À bientôt.

Charles
wkdgs (2022-06-14 08:16:40+00:00): Hi,

einen Privatparkplatz kennzeichnet man mit dem Tag "access=private". Der Tag "operator=Privat" ist hier falsch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122245088