piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2020-04-27 02:33:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.

I can't believe Trader Joe's is gone. I've shopped there a number of times over the years. (I lived in Seattle then now in Mount Vernon)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84128209
Frans S (2020-04-27 17:11:27+00:00): Reviewed as per your request. Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84128216
SHABANI MAGAWILA (2020-04-27 19:21:55+00:00): Thanks for your assistance brother, I improved a little bit. Wishing to do great
user_5359 (2020-04-26 05:58:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Don’t use name only objects.
kimmer1 (2020-04-26 14:49:07+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me. I will review the wiki info on golf courses and clean up the tagging.
aweech (2020-04-26 20:26:08+00:00): Hi, I decided to revert this changeset because it changed the address of this point to be incorrect. Also the entered address was invalid (Grant doesn't go to 2928 North). I tried looking for the correct address on the listed website, but it does not have one. 

If the business changed it's location, you should remove the tags relating to the business from this point, and create a new point where the new location is.
Warin61 (2020-05-02 03:55:59+00:00): The Churchill Mud Bank where it uses Phillip Island Nature Park boundary is changed! The park boundary does not conform to natural features... please do not move the park boundary to conform to this or other natural feature. 
Enter natural features using their own boundaries. 

Not other things you have added may have suffered the same fate.
mapman44 (2020-04-26 05:46:07+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to OSM! Just a hint...you can square up the building corners by selecting the building and pressing the q key. Thanks.
trial (2020-05-06 20:10:34+00:00): Why are you using tidal=sand instead of tidal=yes? You are the only guy worldwide using this tag.
tidel=yes + natural=sand + landcover=* ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Landcover
Shaun das Schaf (2020-05-04 11:50:27+00:00): Guten Tag,

OpenStreetMap ist keine Werbeplattform, sondern eine frei zugängliche Sammlung von Geodaten. Es ist deshalb nicht möglich und auch nicht vorgesehen, Fotos hochzuladen.

Viele Grüße,
Shaun das Schaf
Nmxosm (2020-04-26 10:08:47+00:00): Hallo kaltuna,

ich denke, dass diese Grünfläche nicht der Definition aus dem Wiki (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green) entspricht. Wie siehst du das?

VlG Nmxosm
kaltuna (2020-04-26 18:54:49+00:00): Hallo, ich war auch nicht ganz glücklich mit village_green. Hast Du nen Vorschlag ? Scrub fand ich auch unpassend
Nmxosm (2020-04-27 09:08:42+00:00): Eine zufriedenstellende Lösung habe ich nicht gefunden. Ich schlage landuse=grass vor. 

VlG Nmxosm
kaltuna (2020-04-27 09:28:09+00:00): Okay, damit bin ich einverstanden. Ich ändere es entsprechend.
nevw (2020-04-26 08:16:03+00:00): Hi
Please don’t use abbreviations in the name - Groundwater Rd should be Groundwater Road
Also use upper case in this name - Heritage lane should be Heritage Lane
Tks, keep on mapping
nevw (2020-05-04 07:18:18+00:00): now fixed
SomeoneElse (2020-04-26 14:49:36+00:00): Hello Roadmapking, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You've created a very large building at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48188777/history .  It started out as a residential area but got changed into a building yesterday.  Rather than doing this, you'll want to add the buildings as new things and change the big thing back to landuse.
One more thing - another mapper has tried to get in touch about your edits.  You can see these comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11025555 , although you should have had them by email as well.  In order to reply click on the changeset number in that list, type in the box and click "comment".
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-05-03 13:02:44+00:00): Thanks for fixing this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84223827
Best Regards,
Andy
Константин Гам (2020-04-28 00:41:49+00:00): Вы зачем переходы ломаете то?
RusFox (2020-04-28 13:04:24+00:00): Я не знаю, в какой вселенной у вас на этом переходе появились светофоры, но я через него подъезжаю к дому, и светофоров там не было никогда.
Константин Гам (2020-04-28 13:43:49+00:00): Их снесли вчера что ли? вчера в 23.30 я их видел в далеке, как и год назад когда их наносил
Константин Гам (2020-04-28 13:50:54+00:00): Всё ,пардон. я о похожем перекрестке в другом углу района.
Исправил. Просто меня смутило в данных что светофоров нет, а переходы отмечены как с переходами
Kovoschiz (2020-04-26 09:35:31+00:00): I would wonder if we need this relation
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84129307
Allison P (2020-04-26 13:20:56+00:00): @Kovoschiz, I've brought this up before when the relation was created but received no response. Based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories your suspicion is correct. I wonder if this might require contacting the DWG.
Kovoschiz (2020-04-26 15:28:31+00:00): Since you already contacted the creator, I suppose not. He can make a response easily if he wants.
I say we can add appropriate `brand=` and `branch=`, etc tags to them, and check that each location is well-defined, before deleting it.
Kovoschiz (2020-04-26 15:30:55+00:00): But now I realized https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Brian@Brea/ should be active. Maybe you can message him again now with your original message? Add that we started discussing it once more here.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-01 17:35:34+00:00): @all- indeed - people shouldn't really be creating "category" relations like this, and there are plenty of other ways to do it (brand, operator, whatever).
I certainly wouldn't object if someone deleted it.  The only unique part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10737069 seems to be the website and that's presumably linked from the individual park websites anyway?
Best Regards,
Andy,
(from the DWG)
Kovoschiz (2020-05-12 21:19:58+00:00): I made a try https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85106366
Kovoschiz (2020-05-12 21:30:22+00:00): I would like to add that there are other questionable mapping practices I decided to remove or nullify (made them `fixme=`) for now:
1. Adding `place=locality` to the resorts 
2. Adding a duplicate `tourism=theme_park` at the center as a label 
3. Making resort area `boundary=administrative` `relation`s
Kovoschiz (2020-05-25 07:43:51+00:00): If anyone happens to read this, he undid some changes, viz duplicating `tourism=theme_park` on the `leisure=resort` area.  I'm trying to get a sense of how much he has he done.
aceman444 (2020-05-05 17:33:33+00:00): Suhlasim s popisom. A hlavne by to malo byt railway=razed, ak uz tam po zeleznici nie je ani stopy. Tento pouzivatel zahadzal Slovensko uz neexistujucimi trasami a railway=abandoned, co znamena ze este nejake stopy po nich su. A to nie je pravda. Treba to poopravivat. Napisal som mu.
David Crochet (2020-04-26 08:04:06+00:00): Bonjour. Merci pour cette première contribution. Si le lieu vent des produit issue de la production hyper-local, il faut préférer "shop=farm" qui représente un élément de "vente directe à la ferme. Magasin de producteurs. " alors que "shop=supermarket" réprésente une grande surface. N'hésitez pas à continuer à contribuer.
Jean-Baptiste Jacob (2020-04-26 08:15:34+00:00): Bonjour, parfait je n'avais pas trouvé tout à l'heure. Modification effectuée.

Cordialement.
mapman44 (2020-04-26 12:29:58+00:00): Thanks for all your contributions to OSM. Just a tip...buildings look better when the corners are squared up, and it's really easy...just select the building and press the q key. Thanks.
TheNet1996 (2020-04-26 18:00:15+00:00): Sollte natürlich Tierarzt heißen :)
szydzio (2020-05-06 10:44:28+00:00): W przypadku tych way-ów: 34147254,35306801,35339536,35339537,35341396,35341436,35342968,39624308,40316802,105921353,143042892,143042920,143460834,228428391,228428400,229779057,229779066,342380461,342380463,374849625,489789423,489789424,489789750,698326334,782823809, numery dróg w tagu ref nie odpowiadają danym z powiatbedzin.lp-portal.pl i dublują prawidłowe numery zapisane już w tagu unsigned_ref. Skąd te numery?
szydzio (2020-05-06 10:45:52+00:00): CHodzi o te way-e: 34147254, 35306801, 35339536, 35339537, 35341396, 35341436, 35342968, 39624308, 40316802, 105921353, 143042892, 143042920, 143460834, 228428391, 228428400, 229779057, 229779066, 342380461, 342380463, 374849625, 489789423, 489789424, 489789750, 698326334, 782823809
tanish1980 (2020-04-30 06:02:27+00:00): Hi Risheetha, 
Please note that the given tag "streams" are not correct, they are called "varambu" in Malayalam. please check the  "i" info button on the right side of the tag. when you click on the button it will give the definition of the tag as well as the picture of the same. so you don't get confused. so kindly give appropriate and apt tag to the feature you draw.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84130340
ianlopez1115 (2020-07-09 10:45:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87760146 where the changeset comment is: [Balbalan and Pinukpuk] Rolled-back parts of changesets 84117507 and 84130470 because source data license is incompatible with OSM. For details: github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67
Warin61 (2020-04-27 04:49:29+00:00): 1) I do not understand the changeset comment "Amendments Requested by Osm". Link to this request? 


2) "Sand at Low Tide" appears to be a DESCRIPTION!
I have removed this one and others. 
Please do not add any more other than real names in the name tag. Descriptions should go in the description tag. 

The map should show what you are trying to describe. Features such as buildings are not named 'building', nor tree areas as 'tree' .. the render can show these without overloading the resultant map with text describing things. 

3) You should respond to these comments! You can do so here. This confirms you have revived the message and you may then enter any discussion you want.
Buraddo (2020-06-06 15:44:31+00:00): Did the construction start? I did not see any information regarding this, if there isn't physical construction on the ground, then better leave it as planned
Buraddo (2020-06-06 16:03:05+00:00): Sorry, DC58 is indeed under construction, it is most certainly only the road from Cerneteaz to Covaci and not the final version with highway connection that's being talked about in press. I will modify the under construction part.
lawrencebanks (2020-06-07 08:47:23+00:00): Indeed, the highway connection is not yet under construction, as that probably is part of the whole highway investment coming from the government. Thanks for the correction.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-09-12 13:45:16+00:00): Cuidado voce estragou o mapa aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7448073190 por favor corrija
eggie (2020-04-26 08:10:51+00:00): Bedankt voor je bijdrage.. Probeer wel svp op de adresnode bij te taggen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-26 08:59:50+00:00): Dag peter,
Wanneer de woningen zijn gesloopt kun je ook de woningen zelf verwijderen.. nu heb je alleen de adressen verwijderd.
Wanneer hier geen eenrichting meer is kun je ook de uitzonderingsregels voor moped en bicycle weghalen.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84132191
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-26 09:18:48+00:00): restricties tweewielers verwijderd op oneway=no tagging
Frans S (2020-04-29 17:01:37+00:00): Hi. See my comment on Slack
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84132226
freeExec (2020-04-28 08:51:13+00:00): не нужно использовать forest, все деревья мапятся через wood
Negreheb (2020-04-27 12:14:53+00:00): Hey Amiga4000, erstmal herzlichen dank für das vor Ort checken vom westlichen Pfad hier. Wenn die Wege eigentlich kein(!) Schild haben, sollten wir das access=private eigentlich wieder entfernen, oder täusche ich mich? (Das war vorher dran, weil ich das etwas zu voreilig hinzugefügt hatte. Ist wohl mein Fehler.) Oder siehst du das anders?
Amiga4000 (2020-04-27 12:20:48+00:00): Nun, im Norden war ja das Schild "weg gesperrt wegen Baustelle".
Man kann kleinlich sagen: von Süd nach Nord gehen erlaubt, von Nord nach Süd ned.
Aber ab der Baustelle nach Süden ist kein Schild, auch vom Süden bis zur Baustelle, hatte da den Weg geteilt, den access=private aber noch gelassen
eggie (2020-04-26 08:57:40+00:00): Dag Peter,
Probeer plakken te voorkomen aan de landuse. Tip:  Wanneer je de linker alttoets inhoudt bij tekenen van een lijn plakt het niet.
Hier zie je waar het niet helaaml goed ging en waar het een beetje in de knoop zit. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84132734
Kijk je nog even/
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-26 09:04:22+00:00): Begin in principe nooit met access=no  Staat er een bord Verboden Toegang vooraan?
eggie (2020-04-26 09:11:50+00:00): Het pad heb ik toch maar even uit de knoop gehaald en verbonden met de Kievitendreef. het zou anders niet routeren. 
access=no heb ik verwijderd. 
Gr eggie
eda_n (2020-08-20 00:05:50+00:00): Merci FrancoiseR pour les corrections, c'est mon fils Goumoutch qui fait des bêtises des fois, je venais pour les corriger et inspecter mais tu l'as déjà fait ;) J'ai déplacé la Maison des Musiciens car elle a vraiment déménagé (il voulait sûrement faire ça Goumoutch :)
Frans S (2020-05-03 11:07:11+00:00): Hello Paul. Thanks for mapping here.
I notice that you are a new mapper and did not follow the introduction on Slack. Is that correct? Please ask to review your first mappings on the hotmappings  channel and also review these documents.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1bS_TVHPFHKKVBSdjx3RRQdxhdWrMJ3wdEh_BSnsL4hI/edit%23slide%3Did.p

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1N1rXlAyGcJ6VJ2p3qbD4PRsuo65o3pC5yHB2wq1TGEc/edit%23slide%3Did.p

Best regards
Jacques Lavignotte (2020-04-26 20:29:32+00:00):  Bonjour  blutblu merci pour vos contributions à OpenStreetMap. 
Vous avez coché le bouton pour demander vérification de ce changeset. Peut-être avez vous un doute sur la contribution.
Vous indiquez vous être appuyé sur Geoportail pour trouver le nom du lieu. Hum... ce n'est pas permis. Pas grave.
Si nous ne l'avez pas déjà fait vous lirez https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue Directement le dernier paragraphe : « [...] ne copiez pas des cartes ou des sources dont vous n'avez pas la licence, la source la plus pertinente est d'aller voir sur place ou d'utiliser l'imagerie satellite de votre éditeur. »
Comment faire alors pour trouver le nom du lieu-dit ? On peut demander aux locaux, aux passants, etc.
Vous allez probablement continuer à contribuer à OSM, Vous trouverez de l’aide dans la liste de diffusion Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ou sur notre salon IRC (serveur : irc.oftc.net, salon #osm-fr)

A votre disposition et éventuellement à bientôt, Jacques
Frans S (2020-04-27 10:41:09+00:00): Hello Michael.
I reviewed this changeset.  A remark.
not all round objects are buildings.
Check for a shadow. A round building has mostly a round shadow. 
Check this location
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/-3.410785489793579/32.89770052835366

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84133640
A67-A67 (2020-04-26 11:52:31+00:00): Hallo Syroit,
In Nederland gebruiken we aparte nodes voor de adressen, zoals https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1792095247. Daar taggen we ook POI's zoals winkels en bedrijven op.

De adressen op het gebouw zijn dus dubbelop.
olo81 (2021-02-09 19:32:54+00:00): na początkach rowów melioracyjnych nie dodajemy źródeł 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2108990067
C2oc4 (2021-02-09 19:42:24+00:00): Nawet jeśli woda wydobywa się z ziemi ?
maraf24 (2021-02-09 20:56:52+00:00): Wtedy nie, ale na podkładzie z Esri nie da się tego zobaczyć.
olo81 (2021-02-09 23:12:11+00:00): c2oo4 w okolicy większość rowów została przez ciebie otagowana jako źródła. Według znanych mi map nie ma tam źródeł, ale nie można tego sprawdzić bez osobistego sprawdzenia tego. I właśnie tu jest problem. Dodajesz niesprawdzone dane które trudno sprawdzić w terenie. W dodatku nie widzisz problemu bo przecież tam jest woda.
C2oc4 (2021-02-10 07:45:14+00:00): Sporo tych „źródeł” faktycznie jest
maraf24 (2021-02-10 13:23:29+00:00): A których nie ma?
C2oc4 (2021-02-10 14:14:05+00:00): już powoli poprawiam bez obaw
maraf24 (2021-02-10 14:28:29+00:00): Najczęściej woda w rowach przesiąka z okolicznej ziemi. Nie więc źródła rozumianego jako punktowy wypływ wody podziemnej. Najłatwiej różnicę zauważyć gdy przez dłuższy czas nie pada.
C2oc4 (2021-02-10 14:43:14+00:00): Ależ oczywiście wiem o co Ci chodzi. Znam definicję źródła.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-08 18:47:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147229399, 147229339 where the changeset comment is: revert data added by mapper who used swear words for names claiming to be the 'discoverer' of places
Frans S (2020-04-27 16:54:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Some remarks.
A number of the buildings you have mapped are rather inaccurate.  Please pay more attention on following the outlines of buildings and square each rectangular building with the Q key in RapiD
Don't let nodes of different buildings, roads and other objects connect to each other
I squared the buildings involved for you
Best regards
eggie (2020-04-26 10:19:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tip.. Probeer de wegen los te houden van de landuse. Dus geen verbindingen maken. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-26 10:44:55+00:00): pad even losgemaakt van landuse..
highway=footway gebruiken als er een borwandelpad staat. Rond blauw met de wandelaar.. 
In andere gevallen highway=path gebruiken.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-04-26 10:23:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Probeer svp concreet commentaar te geven bij je edits. 'x' is wat vaag.
MVG,
Eggie
mueschel (2020-04-28 13:46:28+00:00): Hallo,
schau doch mal bitte nach diesem Knoten, da scheint noch etwas beim Tagging zu fehlen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7448377678
okilimu (2020-04-28 18:47:34+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe das Tagging korrigiert
eggie (2020-04-26 10:28:08+00:00): Hi Süzz.. Bitte bekommentarieren Sie Ihre edits.
Die 'description' auf Englisch oder Holländisch.
Öfnungszeiten  geht mit conditional tagging
Zb. access:conditional=yes @ (sunrise-sunset)
Grüss,
Eggie
jeroenhuijben (2020-04-27 23:07:45+00:00): Weet je zeker dat de stacaravan er niet (meer) staat?
Volgens het openluchtmuseum namelijk wel.
https://collectie.openluchtmuseum.nl/collectie/object/442710#headingInfo
https://www.openluchtmuseum.nl/media/inline/2020/3/21/plattegrond_nederlands_openluchtmuseum_hoogseizoen_zomer_2020.pdf
TheRaptor-NL (2020-04-28 18:01:26+00:00): Ik kom af en toe in het Openluchtmuseum. Ik heb de "stacaravan" (die er ingetekend zou staan in OSM) niet gezien. De "Molukse barak" staat er wel gewoon. 
Ik heb de stacaravan in ieder geval niet op die plek gezien. Als het Openluchtmuseum open is zal ik het nogmaals bekijken met de GPS.
eggie (2020-04-26 10:21:06+00:00): Daf Nic,

 Paden svp niet plakken aan de landuse.
Wanneer je de linker alttoets gebruikt plakt de editor niet bij intekenen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-26 10:40:50+00:00): pad losgemaakt van landuse
Nici80 (2021-05-12 06:41:20+00:00): Beetje laat Eggie, maar bedankt voor de feedback.
eggie (2021-05-12 07:16:48+00:00): :)  Beter laat dan nooit...
Veel plezier met mappen
eggie
eggie (2020-04-26 10:49:11+00:00): Zo te zien oke..
Gr Eggie
SimoneJ (2020-04-26 10:52:53+00:00): Dit is niet zo moeilijk ;-)
OrDal (2020-04-26 11:33:21+00:00): שלום shay trails,
כמה תושבים חיים במקום זה?
התג place=village מתאים למקומות עם מעל 200 תושבים. האם חיים כאן מעל 200 איש?
כמו כן, وادي أريحا מתועתק בעברית לואדי אריחא ולא ואדי אריכא. האם יש לתעתיק העברי מקור מסוים?
jgc (2020-04-29 17:38:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Qu’est-ce qui t’a amené à placer la Résidence du Champ de Mars, à La Rochelle, là où tu l’as fait ?
Ça ne me semble pas correspondre à l’adresse, à la description de son site web (« L’établissement est situé au rond point du Champ de Mars.»), ni à d’autres sources.
zorglubu (2020-04-29 21:30:48+00:00): Bonjour,
Je n'arrive pas à voir dans JOSM quelle modification j'ai faite sur le chemin 782183240 (mais il est effectivement marqué modifié par moi). Ce chemin avec son nom "Résidence du Champ de Mars" n'a pas été créé par moi. Il faudrait vérifier sur place.
Par contre j'ai ajouté 2 POI's 7448405414 et 7448405415 (l'Ehpa et l'Ehpad) avec un fixme="vérifier sur place localisation EHPA et EHPAD".
Ce sont des imports FINESS via Osmose pour lesquels l'adresse est juste "avenue du champ de Mars" (cf http://finess.sante.gouv.fr/fininter/jsp/actionDetailEtablissement.do?noFiness=170015978)
Et je présume m'être inspiré de l'existant pour positionner les POIs un peu au hasard.
Donc, merci de les positionner au mieux :-)
jgc (2020-04-30 06:54:20+00:00): Ok, merci, je comprends ce qui t’a fait positionner les POI là. J’ai encore un doute, même si le premier mappeur du landuse cartographie pas mal dans le coin, et donc est sans doute local.
zorglubu (2020-04-30 17:30:29+00:00): effectivement, il doit être dans le coin. Tu pourrais lui demander de vérifier ;-)
canfe (2020-04-27 06:50:52+00:00): Ma davvero è attaccato? Dalle Maxar non sembrerebbe.
Non mi pare neanche che il condominio abbia delle reseghe né che sia connesso in modo obliquo.
Scusa la pignoleria.
ercolinux (2020-04-27 08:46:38+00:00): Il condominio ha in effetti 6 riseghe non solo 1. Per semplicità ho ridisegnato il condominio rettangolare anche perchè non ho le dimensioni reali
.
richlv (2020-04-27 19:24:51+00:00): Woah, thank you for mapping this area.
I just went through it all and was going to map some stuff =)
Mapillary imagery coming soon, should help to add detail ;)
tanish1980 (2020-04-28 16:13:32+00:00): it's better to draw a polygon along the footprints of the house rather putting a point over it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84136299
PLima785 (2020-04-28 10:05:02+00:00): Bom dia, obrigado pelas tuas edições.
Vou só te pedir que uses as imagens de satélite da maxar que são mais recentes do que as da Bing.
Qualquer dúvida tens aqui este canal no telegram https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Cumprimentos,
Pedro Lima
eggie (2020-04-26 10:50:44+00:00): Niks mis mee.. 
Gr eggie
SimoneJ (2020-04-26 10:52:00+00:00): Dank je!
user_3022894 (2021-07-25 20:35:09+00:00): Hi Michael,

eine kurze Frage - eventuell kannst du dich erinnern - der Bahnübergang in Reil ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/599358567/history ), der hat doch Halbschranken, oder? Sieht auf den dortigen Mapillary-Bild, das allerdings von 2016 ist, so aus.

( https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=803510767265631&focus=photo )

Viele Grüße
Lukas