piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wkdgs (2022-05-11 09:54:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Attribut
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120765820
WoSoe (2022-05-10 04:45:17+00:00): Hallo Neb the B!

»area:highway« ist eine Form von Micromapping.
Da jetzt unterschiedliche Verkehrsflächen* in ein Polygone zu packen und einfach mit area:highway=yes zu erfassen, ist glaube ich nicht im Sinne des Erfinders.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area_highway/mapping_guidelines

*Fahrbahn + Fuß-/Radwege + Parkplatz ...
Neb the B (2022-05-10 06:13:43+00:00): Alles klar. Danke für den Link. Ich werde dies nacharbeiten.
ivanbranco (2022-05-10 15:29:55+00:00): Hi SwingingTodd,

welcome to OSM :)

What's the meaning of place=Public Interest? Here you can see valid place=* values: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:place

If you wanted to add an advertising element you could use one of this tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:advertising
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-10 03:08:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
kuhni74 (2023-10-06 22:47:11+00:00): Franz-Josephs-Höhe scheint lt. Geländemodell mehr ein "mountain_pass=yes" zu sein und ca. auf 951m zu liegen.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-10 03:08:21+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
jmapb (2022-05-11 15:53:35+00:00): Hi there. Please consider using geographically smaller changesets! Thanks, J
bxl-forever (2022-05-10 07:52:23+00:00): Hello,

man_made=bridge structures are geometrical areas showing the outline of bridges.
They are not aimed at being tagged with highway=pedestrian.
Fixed.
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:13:29+00:00): Okay thanks I based it on how they did it on the millenium bridge in london
Udarian (2022-05-09 23:13:02+00:00): the full commit message got cut of so here is what was intended:

added more sidewalks and crossings along with updating geometry and tagging for residential roads and adding stop signs were ever necessary. did some TIGER removal. separated Southwest 122nd Avenue from South Miami Heights so that in future editing Southwest 122nd Avenue will not make such a large commit bounding box
eggie (2022-05-10 14:02:37+00:00): Hoi Teek...

Het wordt best mooi op Wieringen. 
Ergens langs de N99 zit nog een stuk waar de tagging niet klopt
natural=wetland en wetland=wet_meadow "moet' op de relatie  .. niet op de outer polygoon. 
Daarom gaat de rendering fout.
Kijk je nog even.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-05-18 09:37:40+00:00): Teek...  Je hebt niet meer gereageerd. 
Ik heb de landuse verwijderd van de outer mp. 
Het zal straks wel correct renderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-18 09:39:20+00:00): Helaas zie ik nog steeds veel landuse verdwijnen. Waarom niet een klein gebied verwijderen en vervolgens de nieuw landuse invullen? Ik zie dat een andere mapper ook getriggerd wordt door je acties.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-18 09:54:53+00:00): Zou je ook hier nog eens naar willen kijken? Misschien vergeten? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/52.4927/4.7004
Gr eggie
MatthewVancouver (2022-05-10 00:00:06+00:00): There's now (I did it in February) a flagged and well-established good quality trail around the North of the lake to connect to the Malcolm Knapp FSR. You can see it on the Strava heatmap.
eerib (2022-05-10 02:22:11+00:00): Thank you for the info. I added the trail in changeset 120770464. :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120770464
Lejun (2022-05-10 09:08:29+00:00): Vu et validé. Tu as utilisé highway=service ce qui est correct, mais en l’occurrence tu aurais même pu ajouter service=parking_aisle[1] pour être vraiment précis.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
cyril42e (2022-05-10 15:14:10+00:00): Merci, j'ai hésité mais j'ai cru comprendre que"parking_aisle" c'était les allées qui menaient directement aux places, alors que là la route entoure le parking qui est fermé, il faut passer par les deux entrées avec barrière de hauteur pour accéder aux places (et je n'ai pas représenté les allées d'accès aux places à l'intérieur du parking car je ne me souviens plus de la configuration exacte). Qu'en penses-tu ?
Lejun (2022-05-10 18:48:34+00:00): Ah, à partir des images aériennes j’avais l’impression qu’on pouvait stationner en dehors de l’espace central. Je te laisse juger.
cyril42e (2022-05-11 06:06:46+00:00): En fait les images aériennes ne sont pas à jour, je les ai juste utilisées pour positionner "relativement" les éléments. La zone à droite n'était de mémoire plus disponible, mais j'avoue ne pas être sûr à 100% de la précision du positionnement vu que c'est un croisement entre une vue aérienne périmée et ma mémoire d'une semaine...
Lejun (2022-05-11 14:26:23+00:00): Ceci explique cela, tout est bon dans ce cas !
IanVG (2022-05-10 01:20:50+00:00): Please ignore 'import' in the changeset description. This is a completely manual addition of reference ID for waterways of Massachusetts.
Lejun (2022-05-10 09:05:36+00:00): Vu et validé, bien joué !
AndresDuhour (2022-05-10 10:27:06+00:00): Buen día!
Sobre las calles del barrio Kentucky, que se cambió la abreviatura primeros, segundos, terceros, no será que el nombre es Los Rhus primera, Los Rhus segunda, Los Rhus tercera? Rhus es un género de árboles, que parece ser la temática del barrio para los nombres de calles. No encuentro otra referencia, pero por  la posición y la repetición, parece que el número se refiere al orden de las calles. Saludos!
mweper (2022-05-10 11:01:47+00:00): Te contesté por MP.
Lejun (2022-05-10 09:04:50+00:00): Pas sur de comprendre, la route est accessible ou pas ? S’il elle ne l’est pas alors un simple access=no aurait suffit.
cyril42e (2022-05-10 15:48:47+00:00): La route n'est pas accessible à cause d'une barrière (de type grillagée, dans la continuite de la clôture), donc vraisemblablement interdite. J'avoue avoir simplement ajouté une barrière de façon "naïve", mais en regardant [1] j'ai l'impression que je dois faire les deux, mettre access=no et laisser la barrière ?

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno
Lejun (2022-05-10 18:50:31+00:00): Je pense que c’est la meilleure solution ouaip. On laisse la barrière, et on pose un access=no ou private dessus.
cyril42e (2022-05-10 21:52:25+00:00): Ca marche, la modif est dans 120812192. Merci pour la review!
Glassman (2022-05-10 17:06:04+00:00): Looks like you accidentally dragged a crosswalk node. I fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120768738
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-10 13:03:18+00:00): voce excluiu aqui a via que dá acesso para este predio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058713874 porque fez isto?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-18 14:23:40+00:00): deleção revertida.
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-05-27 08:19:05+00:00): Hallo michawtal,

weißt Du noch, warum Du für diesen Pfad bicycle=yes in bicycle=no geändert hast?

Gruß Roger Wilco
michawtal (2024-05-27 18:35:52+00:00): Hallo Roger,
ja: ich war am 9.5.2022 zuletzt dort (vom Fahrrad-Routing dorther gelockt). Der Weg war in einem derart schlechten Zustand, dass radfahren auf diesem Wegstück nicht möglich war.
Falls Du den Weg kennst und er jetzt in einen fahrrad-nutzbaren Zustand versetzt wurde: gerne die Attribute aktualisieren!
OSM_RogerWilco (2024-05-30 07:05:42+00:00): Hallo michawtal,

danke für Deine schnelle Antwort!

Gut, dann ändere ich das bei Gelenheit. Ich selber war nicht dort, aber es gibt einen Hinweis mit der Meldung, dass man dot mit dem Fahrrad fahren darf.

Das ist hier auch der Punkt: die access-Tags sind für rechtliche Einschränkungen vorgesehen. Du hast vielleicht keine Lust dort mit dem Fahrrad zu fahren, aber Leute mit Mountainbike oder BMX haben dort ihren Spaß.

Es ist aber wichtig die Wegbeschaffenheit zu erfassen, damit man Router die Chance haben das zu erkennen. Aber dafür sind die Tags wie surface und smothness da. Es gibt auch den Tag obstacle, mit dem man den Weg beschreiben kann:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:obstacle

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 05:04:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317566
IanVG (2022-05-10 01:20:45+00:00): Please ignore 'import' in the changeset description. This is a completely manual addition of reference ID for waterways of Massachusetts.
IanVG (2022-05-10 01:20:34+00:00): Please ignore 'import' in the changeset description. This is a completely manual addition of reference ID for waterways of Massachusetts.
gscscnd (2022-05-10 10:32:14+00:00): Dzięki. Nie pamiętam dokładnie, ale ograniczenie do 30 chyba obowiązuje dalej niż tylko na samych poduszkach. Na wschód byłoby pewnie do skrzyżowania z Oświecenia, na zachód trudniej to określić, być może do Osiedla Młodych Hutników.
Ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3049204
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:52:25+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317417
jleedev (2022-05-19 21:43:50+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121214685
Udarian (2022-05-10 00:44:22+00:00): also updated Eureka Park
Udarian (2022-05-10 01:01:07+00:00): note because I split park of a road I just noticed that I have created a "Invalid turn restriction" I would fix this I just dont know how to remove a relationship, I did not intend to do this I just tried to fix the road.
ntzm (2023-01-17 12:17:59+00:00): Is the southernmost layby actually a layby? From aerial imagery it looks like a bus stop
Ryan Underwood _01 (2023-01-17 12:30:03+00:00): Yes, it's a layby with a disused bus-stop.
user_5359 (2022-05-10 05:42:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
jeslop (2022-05-10 17:59:12+00:00): Hola xeeniatp, gracias por unirte a OSM.

Para los horarios mira https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:opening_hours. Lo que has puesto no es correcto.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-05-10 06:10:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the shop value. I don't believe this ia a supermarket, it could be also convience or farm (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shop)
felipeeugenio (2022-05-10 14:29:56+00:00): Hola.
El tag building es para estructuras, no para el recinto completo. gracias
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:12:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351469
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 05:04:51+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317566
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:59:52+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317501
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:07:32+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351388
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:59:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317501
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-11 03:05:56+00:00): Please upload changes and edits before changing geographic areas.  This should have been two uploads/edits, one for California, and another for New York.

Also, what source did you use for this edit?
kjcbuilder (2022-05-11 03:21:52+00:00): Is that a policy of OSM that I missed?  Or a request of yours in particular.

I am a regular of the area and know and have networked with many business owners.
kjcbuilder (2022-05-11 03:24:16+00:00): Honestly did not realize I had not completed the previous edit, apologies.
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-11 05:16:13+00:00): No worries!  It happens.  It's an OSM guideline or rule of thumb. When edits for two POIs stretch entire continents, it can make it hard to sift through changesets in a particular region.  Say, for example, Kansas, someone wants to see potential changes to the farmlands, this changeset would also pop up.

Anyhow, welcome to OSM!  Feel free to reach out if you have any questions.  I'll see you around, especially once you join the OSM Discord. Haha
jcarlson (2022-05-16 19:43:02+00:00): There are two segments of 126, just east of US 30 / IL 59, which have the tag "la2=separate" added to them. I'm assuming that's a typo of some sort, but it wasn't obvious what it should have been, so I left it alone.
Mundilfari (2022-05-16 21:48:50+00:00): Oops. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Fixed in 121070914. 
On a side note - you wouldn't happen to have access to a relatively recent aerial of the area where 126 crosses 71, would you? I was adding lane and sidewalk tagging on 126, but the most recent imagery I could find is Bing, and the intersection was under construction when the image was taken (mid 2020)....
jcarlson (2022-05-17 03:11:19+00:00): I do! You can see the latest Kendall County aerials on our GIS portal. Here's the webmap for our "latest imagery" basemap.
https://maps.co.kendall.il.us/portal/apps/mapviewer/index.html?webmap=49b9629323544f6c8b2482b51a80bf58
Imagery was flown this March.
jcarlson (2022-05-17 03:12:18+00:00): And jeez, looking at it now, I've fallen way behind on some of this new construction and bike paths!
Mundilfari (2022-05-22 23:24:15+00:00): oh this is cool. Can you help me understand what the licensing situation looks like? Are these open data?
spiregrain (2022-05-16 17:21:35+00:00): Hi VictorIE - in this changeset you added a school site as way 1058744980.   I think it's a new site for Gaelscoil na gCrann.  Do you know if the site on the other side of the road (same institution) is now decommissioned?   (I've added some details to the new site)
VictorIE (2022-05-16 18:20:53+00:00): Hi, I have no knowledge of the area or the school - I was mostly mapping power=*m anything else was incidental. As of mid-2021, all the school buildings north of the main road have been demolished https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1058744980#map=19/54.60036/-7.25333
spiregrain (2022-05-17 07:58:56+00:00): Thanks!
user_5359 (2022-05-11 12:52:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9728512001. What is the meaning of the tag pp=tree?
user_5359 (2022-05-11 09:15:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/6955936292/history. What is the meaning of the tag ba=yes?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:09:58+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351426
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-14 15:48:01+00:00): aeroway=runway is not an area tag
Jan Olieslagers (2022-05-14 15:55:03+00:00): Our very own wiki article about runways opens with the words "A runway is a defined rectangular area" so why should runways be mapped as NOT an area??
I have always questioned the "rule" of mapping runways as lines, even if I can see and appreciate the historical background.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-15 02:01:34+00:00): That's how all other navigable ways are mapped. If you also want to map the area use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:aeroway like is the standard for other tags like highway tags.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-05-15 04:40:20+00:00): I thoroughly dislike using the are:aeroway - it contrary to the very basic idea of "one feature, one entry in OSM". You might also wish to consult my comments on the talk page of the "runway" article. And do not forget that the wiki is not a hard book of law, it is rather a list of common practices and recommendations.
user_5359 (2022-05-10 05:59:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/54581725. I merge your information to the existing information.
Otenkiya (2022-05-15 02:17:44+00:00): ウェイを分断する場合は、既存のリレーションに配慮いただければ幸いです。
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:59:54+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317501
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 00:09:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153351426
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:59:55+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317501
tastrax (2022-05-10 06:26:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for cleaning up some of those microsoft house outlines. Unfortunately they were created from older imagery so most need some realignment. (R key to rotate, M key to move). You can also use the 'Detached House ' tag for residences that are stand alone. Have fun mapping! Cheers - tastrax
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:52:26+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317417
literan (2022-05-10 12:23:48+00:00): забор вы удалили, но вместе с этим и отношение микрорайона сломали (т.к. забор был его частью).

надо было не удалять забор, а просто тег забора с линии удалить. Исправлю
Diacritic (2022-05-10 06:55:05+00:00): Hey Miki,

Thanks for your updates to the St Kilda area. It's great to see some more changes being made to improve the area!

I've just made a few very small adjustments to what you've added: I've straightened the u turn ways at Jacka Boulevard as it's generally better not to split ways unless there is physical separation; much in the same way intersections are shaped like boxes. :)

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120775357
eggie (2022-05-10 08:04:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback highway=pedestrian wordt meestal gebruikt voor voetgangersgebied in stadscentra. Het zal eerder een highway=footway zijn en als je er mag fietsen dan een highway=path
Kort door de bocht Een pad met een G7 bord en/of dat duidelijk alleen bedoeld is voor wandelaars tagge n met highway=footway  surface=??  
Geen bord en ook bedoeld voor tweewielers dan highway=path surface=? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-10 08:22:43+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast met highway path surface = fine_gravel

Het doodlopende stuk Guidogezelle weg had een fietsverbod. Dat lijkt me onwaarschijnlijk en bicycle=use_sidepath  (Er is geen nasstliggend fietspad) heb ik verwijderd. Het was tagging van een voorgaande mapper.
Gr eggie
Roel Culemborg (2022-05-10 09:29:53+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
dank je voor je opmerkingen. Ik kan niet goed zien hoe het nu is. Er loopt vanaf het parkeerterrein een fietspad naar de parallelweg, niet naar de hoek van 19f. (Daar loopt het pad wel naar toe, maar niet voor fietsers)
eggie (2022-05-10 10:06:05+00:00): Er loopt volgens mij een fine_gravel pad  highway=path een beetje buitenom.. langs de woningen zal een voetpad zijn.
Het wordt doorsneden door een highway=track met met van de rasters waar gras doorheen groeit.. grass_paver..
Denk dat dit de route is die fietsers nemen. 
Die gaan echt niet omrijden en er staat geen G7 bord.
Dit was de laatste situatie dit jaar.
Mocht het nu weer anders zijn pas het gerust aan.
De Guido G weg routeert in ieder geval voor fietsers weer. Die had een mapper op slot gezet.
Overigens mag je overal fietsen op paden.. behalve als er een hoofdrijbaan naast ligt. Dan moet je op de weg.
Bedankt voor je reactie.
Eggie
eggie (2022-05-10 10:07:08+00:00): Paar keer ctrl f5 voor het efgect. Dan zie je wat ik gedaan heb. Cache leegmaken van je scherm.
Roel Culemborg (2022-05-10 10:41:51+00:00): Yes, de cache zat in de weg inderdaad, thanks! Het ziet er goed uit nu.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-10 17:20:12+00:00): As I have repeatedly told you, please don't directly features not yet opened.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-10 17:21:02+00:00): And stop merging sidewalks while removing their names.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
willkmis (2022-05-10 15:40:00+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for adding your business. However, the description key is not for advertising messages, and such messages will continue to be removed. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description.
Best,
Will
WoSoe (2022-05-10 18:41:43+00:00): Kannst du bitte, das »Konstrukt« an der Paul-Metz-Straße auf Höhe Siedlerstraße erklären!?

Bei der Paul-Metz-Straße kann ich keine »baulich« Trennung erkennen, die eine Aufteilung auf mehrere Ways rechtfertigt. Wenn dann wird über lanes geregelt …
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:lanes

Busrouten wurden mehr oder weniger zerschossen.
Meiner Meinung nach gehört der Änderungssatz revidiert!
Neb the B (2022-05-11 05:09:13+00:00): Hi WoSoe, Du kannst gerne die Änderung der Paul-Metz-Straße rückgängig machen und die Straße so rein tüddeln wie es aus Deiner Sicht richtig ist.
WoSoe (2022-05-11 06:42:49+00:00): Hallo Neb the B!

»Rein tüddeln« von Daten in die Datenbank sollte man unterlassen – sieht man ja was dabei raus kommen kann. ;-)

Es gibt fast immer Vorgaben bzw. Richtlinien, an denen man sich orientieren sollte, eigene Sichtweise steht erst mal hinten an.

Ob man sich zu Beginn gleich mit relativ komplexen Sachen wie »area:highway« oder »lanes« Tagging beschäftigen sollte?

Sehr hilfreiche Lektüre: 
https://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf
Neb the B (2022-05-11 07:12:20+00:00): :-) ok schon verstanden.
Also revertiere gerne die Straße und mappe Sie wie nach Protokoll vorgesehen zu der existenten Verkehrsführung vor Ort. Können wir auch gerne zusammen machen, damit ich was lerne.
Mit der Brücke, der Fußgängerführung, Bushaltestelle, etc. ist das halt nicht so einfach.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-05-14 11:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120974508, 120912800, 120914654, 120946595, 120911377, 120929151, 120949441, 120917473, 120968474, 120961870, 120910424, 120906050, 120909451, 120958038, 120965868, 120936165, 120932788, 120954989, 120958992, 120904073, 120925153, 120956977, 120908576, 120960780, 120971691, 120907541, 120943409, 120963319, 120959947, 120939377, 120952552, 120921253 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of undiscussed import. Also using data that is incompatible with the OSM tagging system as detailed in our wikis
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-05-14 11:48:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120974508, 120912800, 120914654, 120946595, 120911377, 120929151, 120949441, 120917473, 120968474, 120961870, 120910424, 120906050, 120909451, 120958038, 120965868, 120936165, 120932788, 120954989, 120958992, 120904073, 120925153, 120956977, 120908576, 120960780, 120971691, 120907541, 120943409, 120963319, 120959947, 120939377, 120952552, 120921253 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of undiscussed import. Also using data that is incompatible with the OSM tagging system as detailed in our wikis
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-05-14 11:48:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120974508, 120912800, 120914654, 120946595, 120911377, 120929151, 120949441, 120917473, 120968474, 120961870, 120910424, 120906050, 120909451, 120958038, 120965868, 120936165, 120932788, 120954989, 120958992, 120904073, 120925153, 120956977, 120908576, 120960780, 120971691, 120907541, 120943409, 120963319, 120959947, 120939377, 120952552, 120921253 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of undiscussed import. Also using data that is incompatible with the OSM tagging system as detailed in our wikis
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-05-14 11:48:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120974508, 120912800, 120914654, 120946595, 120911377, 120929151, 120949441, 120917473, 120968474, 120961870, 120910424, 120906050, 120909451, 120958038, 120965868, 120936165, 120932788, 120954989, 120958992, 120904073, 120925153, 120956977, 120908576, 120960780, 120971691, 120907541, 120943409, 120963319, 120959947, 120939377, 120952552, 120921253 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of undiscussed import. Also using data that is incompatible with the OSM tagging system as detailed in our wikis
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-05-14 11:48:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120974508, 120912800, 120914654, 120946595, 120911377, 120929151, 120949441, 120917473, 120968474, 120961870, 120910424, 120906050, 120909451, 120958038, 120965868, 120936165, 120932788, 120954989, 120958992, 120904073, 120925153, 120956977, 120908576, 120960780, 120971691, 120907541, 120943409, 120963319, 120959947, 120939377, 120952552, 120921253 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of undiscussed import. Also using data that is incompatible with the OSM tagging system as detailed in our wikis