piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SHARCRASH (2015-09-11 10:38:26+00:00): After our email discussion, posting here for the record. Since your changesets 33940776 & 33940531:
• relation 5473505 is broken, it is not rendered anymore
• you deleted several MP relations in Esch-sur-Alzette I had created and you replaced some with simple areas, others were deleted also and not even replaced.

It would be appreciable that you alter the elements in a way that does not break them or reduces the work already done by others. Thank you!
SHARCRASH (2015-09-11 10:38:49+00:00): After our email discussion, posting here for the record. Since your changesets 33940776 & 33940531:
• relation 5473505 is broken, it is not rendered anymore
• you deleted several MP relations in Esch-sur-Alzette I had created and you replaced some with simple areas, others were deleted also and not even replaced.

It would be appreciable that you alter the elements in a way that does not break them or reduces the work already done by others. Thank you!
Javierpf (2015-09-23 15:32:54+00:00): borraste el tag highway=residential de la calle y la hizo desaparecer por completo.
geow (2017-03-06 22:44:21+00:00): Hallo zumo, vielen Dank für deine Gebäudeergänzungen in Stephanskirchen.
Kleiner Tipp: Bei Gebäuden wird der Grundriss am Boden erfasst und nicht die im Luftbild sichtbare Dachfläche, die hier meist etwas größer ist, mehr dazu im wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building
In Bayern empfiehlt es sich als Hintergrund statt Bing besser die Bavaria DOP 80 cm (Orthophotos) zu verwenden.
Kannst du in JOSM und iD in den Hintergrundeinstellungen auswählen.
Im Gegensatz zu Bing sind die Bavaria DOP 80 cm nicht nur aktueller (2015 vs 2012), sondern mit Hilfe eines digitalen Geländemodells auch korrekt entzerrt und lagetreuer.
Ich hoffe es ist hilfreich und verständlich was ich meine, ist nicht als Kritik gemeint.
Happy mapping! 
geow
zarl (2016-05-12 09:26:28+00:00): Hi Roland,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370073920 ist ja ein lustiger Weg: access=no + bicycle=designated + foot=designated

Darf der echt garnicht benutzt werden? Oder ist das mal wieder so eine typisch "lässige" Beschilderung mit VZ 250 ohne beschilderte Ausnahme für Fahrradfahrer?

Gruss,
Zarl
zarl (2016-05-12 09:27:54+00:00): PS: Deine (fehlenden) changeset comments helfen leider auch nicht weiter...
Polarbear (2016-07-05 11:48:34+00:00): Das ist doch kein Weideland (meadow). Ich sehe hier Buschwerk (scrubs). Gefixt.
kartler175 (2015-09-12 18:08:26+00:00): Bitte für die Routenerstellung nicht Straßen an gleicher Stelle nochmal anlegen, sondern die schon vorhandenen verwwenden: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=10.88349&lat=51.36760&zoom=16&opacity=1.00&overlays=duplicate_ways
MKnight (2015-10-20 12:46:26+00:00): ich bin gerade dabei das grossflächig zu reparieren ...
SomeoneElse (2015-09-10 20:11:30+00:00): Also adding Cuckney Hay Wood as "landuse=forestry" (to distinguish the managed area, including cleared sections, from the area covered in trees)
Polarbear (2015-09-29 13:41:23+00:00): Auch hier wurde, wie in CS 34127345 und 33919282 name:de benutzt wo old_name korrekt wäre. Bitte korrigieren und Klammern entfernen.
Fritz18 (2015-09-29 20:21:21+00:00): Durch die Klammern wird deutlich gemacht, dass es sich um eine Zusatzinformation handelt zum aktuellen Straßennamen. Ich halte dies für eine brauchbare Möglichkeit, den historischen Namen im Kartenbild darstellen zu können. Aber natürlich kann man die Klammern auch weglassen...
Polarbear (2015-09-30 23:24:52+00:00): Den historischen Namen stellt nur der Kartenzeichner dar, der sich dafür interessiert. Dann tut er das bewusst und braucht keine Klammern.
GerdP (2015-10-17 16:35:30+00:00): please review:
highway=private is unusual.
Did you mean
highway=service
service=driveway
access=private  ?
Russel Taylor (2015-10-19 21:40:12+00:00): I have changed them to highway=residential and access=private.  Hopefully, that is a little more accurate.
GerdP (2015-10-20 06:07:58+00:00): thanks, no offence meant.
You will notice that these roads are now rendered in the map.
Russel Taylor (2015-10-20 14:54:12+00:00): No problem.  If I'm going to spend hours working on mapping, I'd like to do it right!
YarNik (2015-10-20 19:11:45+00:00): Слобода вулиця - на нее как люди или машины попадают?
Myazyk (2015-10-20 20:22:24+00:00): I have no idea. It seems like they ford the Striy river. Or across the street Stryj - but there is also a ford. After the dam had been made, water level rose around the hamlet, and I'm not sure a car will ford to it. People must be using the railway bridge.
YarNik (2015-10-20 21:41:27+00:00): там нет дороги вообще
bryceco (2015-11-14 17:21:09+00:00): Node 3324709809 seems like it should be Parking Garage entrance/exit rather than noexit=yes
sctrojan79 (2015-11-14 18:51:59+00:00): Thanks for the heads up, node updated.
southglos (2015-09-10 23:20:29+00:00): maybe it fell over?  :-)
muralito (2015-09-11 12:42:57+00:00): Elisa, si tambien hay un preescolar, aunque sea en el mismo predio, es una institucion por si misma, una forma de mapearlo es agregar otro nodo con ese elemento, amenity=kindergarten.

Saludos,
M.
Jojo4u (2015-10-05 07:44:55+00:00): Dieser Weg sieht ja wild aus, was will der Author damit sagen? Ein cycleway=* an path gibt es nicht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27660387/history

LG Joachim
Jojo4u (2016-08-27 19:08:51+00:00): Noch eine kleiner Hinweis: für Busspuren access=yes|yes|no statt yes|yes|bus verwenden.
Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370104913
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 16:33:31+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33962020 per discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33931834
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 16:33:13+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33962020 per discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33931834
maraf24 (2015-09-11 22:53:58+00:00): Też nie zadziała.
Numeru domu nie ma?
maraf24 (2015-09-11 22:53:27+00:00): Tak nie zadziała.
fibix (2016-02-19 11:47:24+00:00): Das Signal zeigt im Sommer Hp1 (Wenn Fahrbetrieb ist), ansonsten Hp0. 
Soll dieses Signal wirklich mit direkction=forward und postiion=right gemappt werden? Denn zu einem Weg gehört es ja nicht. 
viele Grüße!
GerdP (2015-11-27 22:19:47+00:00): Hi there!
I've noticed that you changed 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170406787
to oneway=no;yes
I think yes looks correct, so I've changed it to that. OK?
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 16:32:59+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33962020 per discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33931834
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 16:32:44+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33962020 per discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33931834
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 16:32:30+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33962020 per discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33931834
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 16:32:11+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33962020 per discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33931834
JeSe-MX (2015-09-13 14:23:43+00:00): esta vía agregada clasificada como "ciclovía", ¿Es en verdad una pista especial para bicicleta?¿O puede ser transitada a pie, caballo u otra forma de trasporte?

si es lo último, será mejor cambiar a "path" en vez de "cycleway".
jfire (2016-01-11 03:53:51+00:00): Hi angrytomato.

Based on the contents and the source tag on the changeset, this appears to be an import of external data from the USFS. Did you follow the import guidelines: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

If so, can you please point me to wiki page for this import?

Thanks!
btwhite92 (2016-01-19 20:08:26+00:00): Hi jfire, this changeset doesn't follow the import guidelines that you listed. I took the same process having been done in the Shasta ntl. forest as precedent and didn't research the process enough. If it needs to be reverted, I should be able to step through that process when I have some free time in the next week or so. There's not a lot of editing activity in this area so there shouldn't be too much complication in reverting this set. 

On a side note, I'm not sure on what grounds tagging the entire administrative boundary as landuse=forest is justified. There is a difference between "this area is subject to administration by national forest law" and "this area is actively being used for forestry purposes". I'll probably start a discussion on talk-us about this in a few days to see what peoples thoughts are.
btwhite92 (2018-07-30 04:23:20+00:00): For reference - this has been corrected with 61179606 and 61179535
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 16:31:51+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33962020 per discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33931834
SomeoneElse (2015-09-12 10:55:32+00:00): This is a huge changeset.  Would it be possible to describe in more detail (for the benefit of local mappers) what you changed and where, and what the source was?
Rodrigo Rega (2015-09-12 19:51:27+00:00): I fixed unconnected and crossing roads. All of them are little changes, so give a explain for everyone would be too much work.

The source was Bing aerial photos.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-25 11:07:38+00:00): No, it's just common courtesy to explain to other mappers what you're doing - it should neverbe "too much work".  OSM is a collaborative project - we have to work together to try and create the best map.

An "error" on a QA site that there's a potential problem is a very good indication that something needs a proper survey (usually there are other errors locally that need fixing too).  By removing these indications you are preventing local mappers from fixing the map.  Also, where there are genuine issues, by failing to explain to people where they have created problems previously you won't prevent them from doing it again in the future.
Rodrigo Rega (2015-11-25 16:30:41+00:00): I understand. What should I do to fix my error?
SomeoneElse (2015-11-26 13:43:18+00:00): What I normally do when I spot a problem like this is to see if the mapper's just very new.  If they are very new I'd give them a bit of time to get the hang of things (at least a week or so) and then I'd send them a message (via a changeset discussion comment) explaining the potential problem and a possible fix.  In some cases the fix isn't straightforward - quite often a road and a footpath (that are actually in reality the same thing) both get added and joining them when they cross is clearly not correct there.  Alternatively, things that end very close to other things might not join because there's an as-yet-unmapped wall between them.  If there's no reply to the changeset discussion and they don't fix it, and there are other local mappers I'd add a note (so that someone can survey it properly).  If there are no local mappers and it's _really_ clear from the aerial imagery what the issue is I'd fix remotely, but most often I'd just add an OSM note so that when someone local comes along, they can fix it.
Rodrigo Rega (2015-11-26 21:08:39+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. I will take it in account.
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 16:31:35+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33962020 per discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33931834
Supaplex (2015-09-11 04:22:47+00:00): 好久不見，大稻埕的POI靠你了XD
Glassman (2018-08-16 23:39:32+00:00): I noticed the trail name "Abandoned" is that the trail name or is it actually abandoned?
talapus (2018-08-20 02:29:38+00:00): Yes.  This is the old route of the Boundary Trail, and no longer appears on FS maps or in real life.
talapus (2018-08-20 02:30:33+00:00): Sorry, my comment was ambiguous --- it is actually abandoned.  I left the name there to prevent people from thinking that we just didn't map it, but it's probably time to just delete it.
Glassman (2018-08-20 03:40:23+00:00): I'll let you delete it - since you have first hand knowledge. But trail names are sometime "creative" so seeing one named abandoned doesn't surprise me. 

Thanks
mavl (2015-09-11 18:13:24+00:00): Здравствуйте.

На этой линии сочетание тегов, которые противоречат друг другу: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370131282

Тег access определяет юридические запреты http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access. Вы поставили access=no, что значит доступ запрещён всем. Но также поставили horse=yes (доступ на лощадях разрешён) + motor_vehicle=yes (доступ транспортных средств разрешён), что противоречит тегу access=no.
Эта линия обозначает полевую дорогу, на которой вряд ли действуют какие-либо ограничения. Так что, скорее всего, теги доступа на этой линии не нужны. Чтобы указать проходимость дороги, нужно ставить другие теги, например, surface=ground.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2015-09-11 12:04:32+00:00): Maaan - such humongous commits and you use Potlatch ? You must be some sort of Potlatch efficiency freak... I cringe at even small edits in a Web browser ! I see you did nine edits with JOSM - you didn't like it ? If you adopt JOSM we'll finish mapping the whole of Senegal in two months !
spilornis (2015-09-11 05:51:03+00:00): My bad. Перепутал с Бакунина
streckenkundler (2015-09-11 06:27:26+00:00): Hallo kika1974,

wenn du Straßenabschnitte zusammenfügst, passe bitte peinlich genau darauf auf, daß Relationen nicht beschädigt werden: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3419045#map=17/52.08394/13.87229
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4431854#map=15/52.0539/13.9487
Auch durch verschmolzene Straßen entstehende Sachen wie durch Semikolon getrennte Namen sind ein Fehler:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210597536

 Ich weiß, du arbeitest mit iD und iD ist bekannd dafür daß er recht schlampig mit Relationen umgeht... Was ich dir empfehlen kann, wenn du Lust hast: mache dich mit JOSM vertraut... Wenn du fragen hast, kannst du mir gerne schreiben...  

Ich werde bei Gelegenheit die betreffenden Dinge reparieren.

Viele Grüße,

Sven

Viele Grüße,

Sven
streckenkundler (2015-09-11 07:33:54+00:00): Repariert...
Durch das Zusammenfügen wurden in 4 Bus-Routen Straßenteile mit reingenommen, die da nicht hinzugehören. Beim 66-Seen-Rundweg war ein Straßenabschnitt mit drin, der da nicht hinzugehört. Mit Semikolon getrennte Werte im Namen sind Fehler, ebso in den maxspeed-Werten... das entsteht, wenn zwei Straßen, in dem Fall name=Gröditscher Straße; Berliner Straße, sowie maxspeed=50;30

Sven
Vintagejhan (2015-09-14 01:17:42+00:00): 讚!河道資訊越來越詳細了~
leodobrasil (2015-09-16 00:35:54+00:00): Dear Ruth, I observed that you connected roads through existing (and mapped!) fences in this changeset. I´m a local mapper and know from my field survey that there is no connection between the "caminho de acesso à casa de bomba" and Rua K, L and M, respectively, but just a fence.
Sincerely,
Leonhard
ruthmaben (2015-11-16 08:23:55+00:00): Thank you for highlighting this leodobrasil. I have reverted my changeset.
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 16:31:00+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33962020 per discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33931834
Alecs01 (2015-09-12 16:07:08+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! sei tu che avevi aperto alcune note in zona l'altro giorno? grazie per le correzioni, ci sono ancora vari residui dei lavori in corso, se c'è altro che non va, intervieni pure
Kakaner (2015-09-23 09:46:01+00:00): Bitte nicht meinen Namen hier nennen.
Gppes (2018-08-08 07:37:00+00:00): Hallo, Du hast hier auf ein paar Forstwege das access Tag bicycle=no gesetzt. Das war aber mal eine MTB-Tour, LN5 "Vordernberg". Wurde die geschlossen? Lg, Gppes

http://tested.eisenwadl.at/index.php/radtouren/57-ln5-vordernberg
Georges62 (2015-12-11 13:22:03+00:00): fait GC 11/12/15
zstadler (2016-05-10 14:25:27+00:00): Hi,
This changeset modifies the boundary of a nature reserve - http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4726674

Nature reserves' boundaries are a sensitive issue for hikers, as visitors are required to comply with certain restrictions, and the boundaries are not always clearly marked "on the ground". We therefore want to keep the boundaries according to the approved land plans and Nature Reserve proclamations.

See also my post at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54543

According to Israeli law, there is also no issue with having military areas and bases in nature reserves.

In changeset 39218585 I have restored the original boundaries.

Thanks,
Zeev
maraf24 (2015-09-11 22:55:15+00:00): Oznakowania sklepu brakuje.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-09-14 20:53:30+00:00): Jesteś pewien że w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297445671/history zdjęli asfalt?
Georges62 (2015-12-11 16:19:14+00:00): ok GC 11/12/15
SomeoneElse (2015-09-12 11:01:06+00:00): Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187303525/history#map=16/51.2519/7.6026 is an actual Roman Road as suggested by https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q194029 ?  Also, what does "name:etymology:wikidata" mean in this context (and what's the relationship to the Queen Fabiola mentioned in the changeset comment)?
Polyglot (2015-09-12 11:20:19+00:00): When working on that changeset, I was looking for objects named after our former Queen Fabiola. Previously I had done something comparable for Roman roads in Belgium and The Netherlands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_roads#External_links

It's unlikely that it's a coincidence that these roads have such names.

I couldn't be sure about this Fabiolastraße referring to our late queen a bit further south though:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187303525/history#map=16/51.2453/7.6107

If you're sure that this has never been part of the Roman Road system, please remove the tags. OTOH, I notice now that I managed to 'forget' a few sideroads.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-12 11:27:14+00:00): You'd want a bit more evidence that a road actually was a roman road beyond the name, though surely?  

For an example, not far from me https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145006134 is called "Roman Way".  There's obviously a roman naming theme going on there (Fosse Close and Dere Croft are nearby), and it's adjacent to the A6005 (actually a roman road), but "Roman Way" isn't itself one.
Polyglot (2015-09-12 11:48:28+00:00): you're right, it's not ideal. All name:etymology:wikidata says it is named after something. If it's not about the road network, was it after the Romans or after Rome that this particular one was called? It's probably not of great importance, so we better remove those name:etymology:wikidata tags.

In the case of writers, poets, mayors, kings, queens, princes and princesses it does seem interesting to me to be able to show where the streets and buildings named after them are located. Or where there are statues, graves, birth houses and musea. Those are usually easier to identify.
Polyglot (2015-09-12 11:51:19+00:00): This is the result of adding wikidata tags for Queen Fabiola to OSM, then adding a link to it on Wikipedia:
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabiola_Mora_y_Arag%C3%B3n#Literatuur
JanisJf (2015-09-11 21:41:03+00:00): Könntest du mir sagen was genau ich falsch gemacht habe, ich möchte mich verbessern. Thx
kartler175 (2015-09-14 13:09:08+00:00): z.B. diese Fläche hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370252603 ist kein inner-Bestandteil der Relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370252603, sondere eine eigenständige Fläche. Natürlich muss der Umriss der outer-Way  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370252603 des MP angepasst werden.
Weiter Fälle: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=10.83898&lat=48.36611&zoom=13&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags
JanisJf (2015-09-14 13:49:35+00:00): Ok danke für die links ich werde beim nächsten mal darauf achten und jetzt erstmal bestehende Fehler fixen.
GerdP (2015-10-08 03:15:27+00:00): please review:
this change produced many 
highways with name
name=Via Toniolo
and maxspeed=50, many of them
service ways
mau59 (2015-10-08 21:11:59+00:00): Rectified. I don't know how that could come about – to my knowledge there isn't even a "Via Toniolo" in Pontedera.
GerdP (2015-10-09 07:02:05+00:00): thanks, I'll fix a few more problems in this area
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-06-14 00:41:52+00:00): Hi ThiagoPv,
I removed your edit on this restriction relation (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/5499970) based on this image (https://is.gd/sDgaJU). if there is any update around, please let me know.

Thank you, happy mapping!
(https://maproulette.org/challenge/17411/task/97091452)
FvGordon (2015-12-14 22:54:56+00:00): Hat das Café Moskau wieder geöffnet? Wenn ja, könnten die temporary Attribute wieder weg.
Hedaja (2015-12-14 23:19:03+00:00): hatte ich aus den Augen verloren. Laut presse ab Januar unter der Leitung des anliegenden Hotels:http://www.freiepresse.de/LOKALES/CHEMNITZ/Caf-Moskau-oeffnet-Anfang-Januar-wieder-artikel9375337.php
pfg21 (2015-09-17 06:59:40+00:00): Зачем создал вторую остановку БюХмельницкого ??
и зачем такое кривое имя ??
NeoChapay (2015-09-17 07:01:03+00:00): Тупим-с...
waldhans (2015-09-12 21:19:58+00:00): Habe gesehen, das Du die Commerzbank Filialen eingetragen hast. Habe ich in Viersen auch versucht. Eine Frage dabei: wäre es nicht besser, die ATM getrennt einzugeben? Dafür gelten unterschiedliche Öffnungszeiten, ATM Commerzbank 24/7, bei der Sparkasse Viersen aber Mo-Su 06:00-24:00.
Was hältst du davon?
uvi (2017-02-24 12:54:28+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3739023985
Handelt es sich hierbei möglicherweise um einen Milchautomaten? Erfahrungsgemäß empfiehlt sich folgendes Beispiel ganz gut: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545 . 
Bist du ortskundig, kannst du dies ändern?
Gruß Uwe
uvi (2017-04-11 13:43:06+00:00): Ich konnte ergänzende Angaben ermitteln und habe sie eingetragen.
5m4u9 (2015-09-11 15:46:33+00:00): No. Living street not connected with the avenue. There are few meters of kerb. 

I will revert this change
oini (2015-11-16 08:52:26+00:00): Thanks for the feedback.
eggie (2017-05-22 07:55:49+00:00): Beter laat dan nooit..PB gestuurd met welkom
aceman444 (2019-02-16 23:59:11+00:00): Zdravim, ta nabijacia stanica na node 3739082347 je ta ista ako som pridal ja na node 6179580178 ? Myslim, ze moja poloha je spravna. Podla coho ste umiestnili Vasu? Samozrejme mohli ju aj za tie 4 roky premiestnit :)
Jose Riha (2019-02-17 11:12:34+00:00): dobry den, pocas buduceho tyzdna preverim aktualnu situaciu, j
Jose Riha (2019-03-31 21:20:23+00:00): vyriesene via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68253192
aceman444 (2019-03-31 21:31:38+00:00): Super, dik. Tak teraz len zistit typ zasuviek na tej nabijacke :) Na hlavnej stanici su tri rozne, nastastie je na wiki priklad ako presne taku kombinaciu otagovat.
Swen Wacker (2015-09-11 17:35:38+00:00): Das hier: http://www.seb-baugrund.de/index.php/echem-1.html ?
stephan75 (2015-09-16 15:37:59+00:00): genau das!! ... aber da sind online keine Straßennamen ersichtlich, oder?

Das Haus mit der Nummer 6 ist aber schon fertig, und die bekommen schon Post ... also muss es schon einen Straßennamen geben.
Swen Wacker (2015-09-17 14:05:05+00:00): Gibt es auch, aber blöderweise ist der Widmungsbeschluss (den es hoffentlich gibt) bislang noch nicht im Amtsblatt des kreises veröffentlicht worden. Und die Samtgemeinde veröffentlicht die auf ihrer Webseite leider nicht. Bleibt nur zu warten, dass da mal jemand vorbei fährt und aufs Schild guckt.
stephan75 (2015-09-19 10:41:14+00:00): Bisher gibts da kein Straßenschild, aber vielleicht in einigen Wochen ... oder eine email an die SEB schicken und fragen.
adas (2015-09-17 20:04:13+00:00): Zostało tutaj usunięte kilka chodników, które dodałem. Przez to nie będzie działał routing (bo nie ma przejść dla pieszych).
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-21 12:38:50+00:00): patrz też http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=548541#p548541
SomeoneElse (2015-09-18 17:22:03+00:00): Thanks for adding a bit of Centenary Way!  I've added it to the relation; you can see the new bit at http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1069677#map=12/52.9657/-1.3810 .
Skippern (2015-09-12 15:03:47+00:00): O cemitério não mais existe?