piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-09 10:13:17+00:00): I've also created a note here as the reserve appears to be mapped twice - both areas are over a decade old but the boundaries are very different.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3391892
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Patr1k_P (2022-10-11 15:12:17+00:00): tu nemoze byt oznacene parkovisko aj chodnik https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894895187

tou areou si tiez nie som isty ale pri parkoviskach sa to nezvykne znacit, skor tam kde je namestie
eggie (2022-10-09 11:26:02+00:00): Dag Klaasjan
Lijkt me beter zo,
horse=private hoeft niet. De algemene tagging access=private geldt voor alle categorieën.
Of de wegenverkeerswet hier van toepassing is? maxspeed 80? 

Groet
eggie
KlaasjanElzinga (2022-10-09 11:29:16+00:00): Nee, ik kreeg het van de horses niet meer weg. Ik probeer het nog even.
KlaasjanElzinga (2022-10-09 11:30:44+00:00): Aangepast.
eggie (2022-10-09 11:45:09+00:00): Top... Volgens mij kun je in editor iD kiezen na selectie voor 'Alle tags zichtbaar'. Ergens links in het scherm.
Zelf ben ik een josm gebruiker.
Die geeft meer overzicht.
Mapse
Eggie
eggie (2022-10-09 11:20:27+00:00): Dag KlaasJan...  
Dat is fijn voor de kapper, maar het adres zal vast niet ook met pensioen zijn en dat heb je ook verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-09 11:21:31+00:00): Het adres heb ik weer teruggezet,
Groet
eggie
KlaasjanElzinga (2022-10-09 11:22:39+00:00): oh, bedankt! Ik zal er de volgende keer op letten.
kuhni74 (2025-07-08 12:45:47+00:00): wo kommt der wenig signifikante Name "Höhe" her?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10086764080
Frans S (2022-10-13 10:59:55+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127242327
mini-me (2022-10-09 17:41:07+00:00): Правила OSM запрещают перерисовывать с других карт. Также, обращайте внимание на предупреждения в редакторе.
antonr (2022-10-20 18:38:39+00:00): Hej Niels,

Det ser ud til at du har splittet parking/rest_area ud på to ways. I [1] kom jeg tilsyneladende til at tilføje begge tags på én way. Min hensigt var, så vidt jeg husker, at konvertere rest_area til parking. Jeg observerede ikke andet end en grusoverflade, da jeg var på stedet (fx ingen toiletter, borde, ...), så amenity=parking virkede mest korrekt.

Er der noget jeg har overset, der taler for at det er bedre (også) at have et highway=rest_area?

Mvh
antonr

[1] www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126560714
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-10-21 01:04:09+00:00): Nej, hvis du har være på stedet og ikke så indikationer på at det skulle være et rest_area, så er det nok ikke det.

Jeg fandt et par steder på nettet, der omtaler det som en rasteplads, men hvis det ikke er skiltet og det ikke ligner, så er det nok ikke.

Det kom ind i changeset 122442451


Men https://ligeher.nu/hjoerring/nyheder/livet-her/derfor-staar-der-en-stor-ny-gittermast-paa-p-pladsen-ved-nybaek-plantage/2ffb1b0b-87ec-414a-b4a9-ba7ff447cf91
osmviborg (2022-10-21 03:29:45+00:00): 'rest areas don't have places to buy fuel, but they may have picnic tables, garbage bins and toilets'.
antonr (2022-10-22 13:15:04+00:00): Tak for svar

Ser ud til at ligeher.nu-linket omtaler som både p-plads og rasteplads, og som osmviborg skriver har wiki'ens beskrivelse/discussion[1] af rasteplads ikke noget strengt krav om noget bestemt udstyr. Det lader også til at der er forskellige opfattelser af konceptet i UK/US/AUS.

Mapillary viser rasteplads-skiltning (M34) så jeg lader den være.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Drest_area
Patr1k_P (2022-10-10 07:13:39+00:00): zdravim, snazte sa zachovavat historiu objektov, napr. tento bankomat https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4281799818 ste vymazali a o par metrov dalej vytvorili novy, (jedna sa o tu istu budovu), pritom stacilo upravit len tagy
fuchspl (2022-10-17 23:28:42+00:00): Cześć,
dlaczego zmieniasz nazwę jeziora na Wycztok? Zarówno Państwowy Rejestr Nazw Geograficznych (identyfikator 153678) oraz wykaz jednolitych części wód powierzchniowych PGL Wody Polskie (PLLW21059) używają nazwy "Wysokie".  PRNG podaje "Wycztok", "Wysoka" i "Wytczok" jedynie jako nazwy oboczne i takie nazwy umieściłem w tagu alt_name.

Inna sprawa, że w rzeczownikowych nazwach jezior nie piszemy słowa "Jezioro", np. "Jezioro Śniardwy" tak jak nie opisujemy Bałtyku "Morze Bałtyk" ani Wisły jako "Rzeka Wisła". Polecam ten wątek na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=21550
Natsu_ (2022-10-09 11:42:50+00:00): 「23个公交场站要更名！还有一批公交线路要调整！」—— 深圳市公共交通管理局
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/e53c-C4IHtsBGAj2ZIOiww
Frans S (2022-10-13 11:01:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127244294
Patr1k_P (2022-10-10 07:43:58+00:00): po nakresleni budovy treba pouzit Q potom bude pekne zarovnana do praveho uhla a nebudu z toho lichobezniky

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102323055
Patr1k_P (2022-10-10 07:46:27+00:00): v tomto pripade by si vsak pokazil geometriu inych budov, skor to plati pri samostatnych budovach
Waffelo (2022-10-10 16:23:14+00:00): Ďakujem za radu
Nielkrokodil (2022-11-19 08:37:03+00:00): Ist dort tatsächlich das Betreten verboten (access=private) oder nur das Befahren (vehicle=private)? Oder darf man zu seinem Feld fahren (vehicle=agricultural)?

Als ich dort war (ist schon etwas länger her) war das glaube ich noch erlaubt, dort zu gehen.
emergency99 (2022-11-19 10:07:54+00:00): Auf dem Zugang von der L2127 stand wie ich vorbei ging ein Fahrverbotsschild  Schild und darunter (offenbar neuer) das kleine gelbe "Privatgrund Betreten verboten". Kann sich natürlich theoretisch nur um den kurzen Abschnitt zwischen L2127 und der Ecke handeln, aber da der Weg eins war, wollte ich ihn, ohne das Wissen nicht aufteilen. Weil warum wäre nur der Teil Privat und alles andere zugänglich?
Nielkrokodil (2022-11-23 19:42:11+00:00): Danke für die Aufklärung!
mosstreet (2022-10-09 12:14:37+00:00): goods=no hgv=no
mosstreet (2022-10-09 12:19:30+00:00): ferry line Port Kavkaz Port Krym 
trucks buses cargo vans passengers pedestrians free no pay
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-09 13:05:31+00:00): Park ma w sobie alejki parkingowe?
Jakub Wenda (2022-10-09 16:11:39+00:00): Też mnie zastanawia dlaczego są zaznaczone w ten sposób na mapie. Alejki istnieją, ale są to typowe alejki spacerowe. Miejsce funkcjonuje jako park, zaznaczony jest w ten sposób na mapach google, a w przyszłości deweloper lokalnego osiedla planuje w tym parku dodatkowe inwestycje w udogodnienia dla mieszkańców.
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-09 16:22:12+00:00): Skąd nazwa parku? Bo w internecie nie mogę znaleźć czegoś co potwierdzi nazwę "Park Kompozytorów". 
Co do alejek to jak patrzę na zdjęcia z geoportalu to wygląda jakby w tym parku parkowały samochody.
Jakub Wenda (2022-10-09 17:00:33+00:00): Ma Pan rację. Północna granica parku powinna przebiegać pod wewnętrzną drogą równoległą do ulicy Radzikowskiego (na mapach widać tam samochody). Ponadto nazwa którą znalazłem brzmiała "Park Wizjonerów", ale pojawia się też nazwa "Park Radzikowskiego". Wjazd na wewnętrzne uliczki jest zablokowany, a same alejki są zapuszczone, ale stoją przy nich ławeczki i kosze na śmieci. Po dłuższych poszukiwaniach znalazłem informacje, że miejsce to jest planowanym od kilku lat parkiem na który do tej pory brakowało funduszy. Obecnie trwają konsultacje społeczne, a miasto rozpoczęło pierwsze prace.
Frans S (2022-10-13 11:02:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127244956
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-09 13:56:35+00:00): I would suggest doing edits to boundaries seperately from edits to other objects (here: changed ref:settlement to ref:census2015).
This way other contributors can more easily see what changed.

Also, it may be beneficial to discuss changes in their import thread / github issue so it can be changed on all boundaries.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-13 11:04:33+00:00): Hello. See my comment on changeset 127244956,
Also these mappings are rather sloppy.
* Quality prevails over quantity !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127245639
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-09 22:31:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
PizzaCutter (2023-08-19 18:19:50+00:00): Dobrý deň, Vaše opravy na Bajklaskej a Ústecko-Orlickej ulici sú nesprávne, keďže ste použili staré snímky (Ortofotomozaika SR 2017-2019). Usporiadanie ulíc je teraz iné, preto som ho upravil späť podľa novej Ortofotomozaiky SR 2020-2022.
os-emmer (2022-10-23 16:55:49+00:00): War es absicht, dass du den Parkplatz hier mehr oder weniger dreieckig gemacht hast?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38092973
Edelsalami (2022-10-23 18:52:39+00:00): Ne.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Carto'Cité (2023-03-20 15:23:51+00:00): Bonjour Aymeric,
Merci pour ta contribution et pour le commentaire précis. Tu l'as donc bien décrit comme une double sens cyclable (DSC) mais en bande (lane). Si ne sont que des pictos et qu'il n'a pas de bande alors il faut simple utiliser opposite (et ajout oneway:bicycle=no également). Je me permets de corriger dans ce sens et je supprime cette portion (https://www.osm.org/way/1155816903) car pour traverser je pense que les cyclistes prennent la traversée cyclable qui est à côté. 
Si tu as la moindre remarque ou question n'hésite pas 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-10 05:44:58+00:00): No, the address number of this building is not 33. We fill address numbers in Vilnius according to official information ~once a week. Good luck!
Florent Bécart (2022-10-11 10:29:21+00:00): Hi Tomas, thanks for the correction, I will not update this building number again.

Although I am confused: there's a big "33" next to the front door. Maybe it's legacy marking.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-12 06:02:55+00:00): Unfortunately that is a known problem: people sometimes THINK that the number of a building is X and put their own (not official) number on a building. In this case it was just a duplicate of the real number, but we've seen totally invented numbers in the central old town - Vilnius g. :-) Like people seeing 20B next to their building and therefore inventing and putting a number 20C on their own building where 20C does not actually exist in official address registry.
Frans S (2022-10-13 10:11:48+00:00): Hello. See my comment on changeset 127251038
Here, you mapped farmland as buildings as well
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
I will remove these odd mappings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127247154
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-16 13:45:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2229459857/history

You added shop=restaurant there.

Have you intended to map a restaurant?

Or place selling equipment for restaurants?

Or something else?