piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Supaplex (2021-01-28 17:34:38+00:00): I think there is no Apple Store in Changhua
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98309779
GuyR1 (2021-01-29 15:44:47+00:00): Can you change this to 'apple reseller' please?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:28:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Supaplex (2021-01-28 17:34:12+00:00): Why do you change a food count in the university into a Apple Store?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98310057
GuyR1 (2021-01-29 15:45:06+00:00): Can you change this to 'apple reseller' please?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:47:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
user_5359 (2021-01-29 05:33:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:37:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:54:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:39:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:25:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse (2021-01-28 17:53:59+00:00): Hello,
You appear to have broken the geometry of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2374762#map=11/39.6779/46.5831 again.
Do you need help understanding what's changed and why it might be a problem? Let me know if you do.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-01-28 17:54:28+00:00): Здравствуйте,
Похоже, вы снова нарушили геометрию https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2374762#map=11/39.6779/46.5831.
Вам нужна помощь в понимании того, что изменилось и почему это может быть проблемой? Дайте мне знать, если вы это сделаете.
С уважением,
Энди
Hb- (2021-01-28 21:47:35+00:00): You probably need to escalate this. OP seems not to recognize the effects of her edits.
syntex (2021-01-28 22:06:13+00:00): I am trying to fix this right now
syntex (2021-01-28 22:13:11+00:00): I reverted all changesets of this user here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98321988
SomeoneElse (2021-01-28 23:23:53+00:00): @syntex Thanks (again)
@Russian Peacekeeper Please, let us help you.  We're trying to understand what you're trying to represent here.
TheBestIdea (2021-02-01 20:58:19+00:00): Hey daggarw,
What's the source for the 20 mph speed limit on Central Park North? NYCDOT data shows that there are no speed limit signs on that stretch so the limit is the NYC default of 25 mph. See the speed limit tab at https://vzv.nyc

Thanks!
daggarw (2021-02-02 13:42:55+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit, Apologies for the incorrect addition of speed limit, I've made the necessary changes under the changeset (#98582312). Will ensure not to repeat such errors,  looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
daggarw.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
mrk1 (2021-04-23 05:36:35+00:00): @multimodaal volgens mij is het pad inmiddels geopend. Ik fiets er minimaal twee keer week en er hangen geen linten meer. Is nooit gesloten en het info bord staat bij de ingang aan de westkant. Ik heb hem op open gezet. Mocht je andere info hebben. Dan hoor ik het graag.
multimodaal (2021-05-02 17:41:45+00:00): Hoi Mark, dank voor de update en je bericht. Heb nog even contact gehad met de routebeheerder en die bevestigt jouw waarneming. Omdat er nog steeds sprake is van grote piekdruktes wordt er verder nu nog even geen ruchtbaarheid gegeven aan de opening van dit nieuwe pad (formele opening volgt nog), maar voor nu prima zo in OSM. Groet!
redd (2021-01-28 23:20:31+00:00): 👍
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:27:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:45:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
user_5359 (2021-01-29 05:32:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the school please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
TheRealRooster (2021-01-29 15:24:48+00:00): Thank you, I'll add more details with the school.  I added several schools yesterday and tried to pull in a lot of information, but this link is extremely helpful!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:34:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:44:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Rico557 (2021-03-25 13:20:08+00:00): Курчатова 28 только первые два подъезда ЖСПК, остальное УЖРЭП.

П.С. Я вернул как было.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
streckenkundler (2021-01-28 20:22:25+00:00): Frage...

welchen Hintergrund hat es, daß du seit geraumer Zeit reihenweise korrekte Verwendungen von MP-Relationen auflöst?

Im Moment betrachte ich das als Vanda....

Danke,

streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2021-01-28 20:32:14+00:00): Abgesehen davon, daß dein CS-Kommentar dazu reichlich unpassend ist, siehe: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=817098#p817098

streckenkundler
Skinfaxi (2021-01-28 21:28:40+00:00): Ein klarar Gewinn. korrekt heist nicht verbesserungswürdig und es gibt sehr viele, reichlich ausdiskutierte und in der Gemeinschaft verankerte Gründe, Daten zu vereinfachen - ergo Multipygone aufzulösen und durch einfachere und klarare Strukturen zu ersetzen. 

Prima!
Hungerburg (2021-01-28 21:49:29+00:00): Nicht alle Renderer zeigen alle Binnenflächen weiter an, wenn nicht als MP angelegt. Hab selber schon große MPs in kleinere zerlegt, was sehr heikel ist, weil ich diese Dinger verabscheue die viele Quadratkilometer groß sind, aber wie gesagt, es gibt nicht nur OSM Karto, das gehört berücksichtigt. Wurde das hier gemacht?
streckenkundler (2021-01-28 21:53:31+00:00): Nein, das ist ein Informationsverlust..

Komplex ist sowas wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2676148
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1398208 (Ach, Oh, wer ist denn das der Bearbeiter?)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1307721

... Noch mehr Beispiele?

Mir geht es nicht um große komplexe MP's, wo man wirklich schauen muß, ob diese nötig sind... Wenn aber nun auch simple Relationen mit ausschließlich 1 Outer-Linie und 1 Inner-Linie aufgelöst werden und das gutgeheißen wird... Na dann Gute nacht Marie... :(
streckenkundler (2021-01-28 21:57:28+00:00): @Hungerburg

hier wurden die aller einfachsten Arten von MP's aufgelöst. Dinge, die im Rendering alle (gängigen) Renderer seit Jahren beherrschen. Mit der Auflösung wird nun z.B. Wald gezeigt, wo keiner ist... 

=Verschlechterung der Daten...
Hungerburg (2021-01-28 22:20:57+00:00): Im VTM Renderer (meine Wanderapp) ist die stacking-order der landuses fix, entweder sieht man die Wiese im Wald oder den Wald in der Wiese, ein Drittes gibt es da nicht. Da es sich bei Multipolygonen aber um eine Grundfunktionalität handelt, würde ich es nicht einsehen, wenn ich die App wechseln müsste um eine exakte Karte zu sehen.

Wo eine outer und eine inner Linie verknüpt sind solle eventuell auch die Karte halbwegs bald aktuell sein. Wenn da aber die outer außen bleibt und die inner innen, dann sehen manche Nutzer danach durch die Finger und OSM-Carto erzeugt ein Mischmasch, das vielleicht nett aussehen mag, aber man auch extakt markieren könnte, wenn es darum ginge (zB swamp kontra marsch).

PS: achavi hat sich beim Betrachten des CS aufgehängt, wenn ich Relationen angekreuzt hab, ich weiß also nicht, was hier los ist
streckenkundler (2021-01-28 22:27:55+00:00): Das mit achavi ist mir auch aufgefallen. Da nur Relationen gelöscht wurden, wird nichts angezeigt...
Hungerburg (2021-01-28 23:22:03+00:00): Jetzt ging es, vorher war die Meldung, dass 2GB für die Abfrage nicht ausreichten. Soweit ich das sehe wurden Gemeindegrenzen verschoben, geringfügig nur, detto Postbzirke.

Bei großen Multipolygonen kann es manchmal über eine Woche dauern, bis die wieder korrekt rendern, vor allem wenn man alles richtig gemacht hat. Fehler kommen schneller ;)

Kann es sein, dass achavi gelöschte Relation gar nicht anzeigt?
Hungerburg (2021-01-29 09:25:49+00:00): Die gelöschten Relationen sieht man im CS, mit JOSM kann man sie zurückholen; Gelöscht wurden 4 Relationen inkl. aller 8 Mitglieder, von Gebüsch umsäumte Tümpel zB; so weit so gut.

Am verfügbaren Luftbild sind die Sachen alle zu sehen; muss aber nicht heißen, dass es die wirklich noch gibt.
streckenkundler (2021-01-29 09:37:15+00:00): Es gibt einige vorherigen Changesets, wo auch sowas gelöscht wurde. Bei solcher struckturreichen Ackerlandschaft halte ich es für äußerst wahrscheinlich, daß sowas noch existiert.
Jordi MF (2024-01-27 23:28:46+00:00): Hola HomoGradiens,

T'escric perquè una persona que coneix Xodos m'ha escrit informant-me que la senda i pista denominades "Camí Reial" no serien correctes perquè creu que el Camí Reial no transcorre per ací. He buscat la proposta de classificació de vies pecuàries i és veritat que estos trams no hi apareixen:
https://icvficherosweb.icv.gva.es/doc_asociada_visor/internet/forestal/vias_pecuarias/fdvp/120555/ (vore "Proyecto Clasificación.pdf")

El visor de l'ICV mostra de manera més fàcil els assagadors. He vist que l'assagador denominat "Pas Reial d'Aragó" transcorre des del molló on s'encreuen els termes de Xodos, Llucena i el Castillo fins al Mas de Sanaüja. No sé si és el mateix que tu denomines "Camí Reial".
https://visor.gva.es/visor/?extension=723081,4452007,734153,4457184&nivelZoom=14&capasids=Topografico;,Toponimia;,Forestal;44,Forestal;10,Forestal;9,Forestal;8&tcapas=1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0

Salutacions,
Jordi
user_5359 (2021-01-29 16:29:23+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
FIRME_0623=03
F_ALTA=2020/07/01
ID=194827104
ID_HOJA=49066
ID_TRAMO=20370068875
ID_VIAL=620000000002
SITUA_0623=02
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
Frans S (2021-01-29 11:35:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
A: Inaccurate mapped
B: overlapped buildings
E: Buildings not squared

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98316366
felipeeugenio (2021-01-28 21:28:16+00:00): Estimado. La bomba de bencina ya no existe? porque la borró , pero dejó todo el resto de los tags y más. por favor aclarar. para dejarlo bien hecho. mientras tanto voy a hacer que vuelva a ser una bomba de bencina y voy a separar la tienda, que son cosas distintas. Por favor no mezclar todo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98316574
Camilo Nuñez Castro (2021-01-28 21:35:55+00:00): Estimado nunca se borró la bencinera, al contrario se modificó la empresa concesionaria.
Sale PETROBRAS y realmente es una SHELL.

Y antes de dar cosas por hecho, pregunte antes de.
En ningún momento se mezclaron las tiendas ni se borró algo, como le dije fue modificación.

Y solo un mensaje Ud se cree bastante amo y señor de OSM con dar declaraciones, que a veces no corresponden, para que sea más cuidadoso antes de afirmar algo que ni Ud sabe es consultar.
felipeeugenio (2021-01-28 21:49:34+00:00): Hola Camilo. Disculpas si interpretaste lo que te dije como un reto. La verdad es que me toma bastante por sorpresa el tono de la respuesta. Lo que estoy declarando es porque borró el tag amenity=fuel. No es una opinión, es un hecho. Además le agregó el tag shop convenience al mismo polígono, lo que es, de facto, mezclar ambos conceptos.
felipeeugenio (2021-01-28 21:51:57+00:00): De hecho, su edición salió con las alertas del sistema que usamos para detectar este tipo de equivocaciones como "invalid tag modification", por lo cual me metí a ver.
Camilo Nuñez Castro (2021-01-28 22:54:54+00:00): Lo más probable de lo ocurrido fue que al realizar el cambio de nombre de PETROBRAS A SHELL, se desplegó un listado de SHELL, ej. Estación de servicio y otros. Al colocar Shell y luego enter se habrá seleccionado el Tag incorrecto.
Zhytomyr (2021-12-20 19:14:31+00:00): Hi Sann,

after https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/88786782 has changed from a boundary to a landuse, is this the GNIS id still valid?
sannkc (2021-12-24 06:54:36+00:00): Hi! Thanks for checking on this changeset.  ​Yes, I think the GNIS data is most likely still valid, although I'm open to the possibility that there are better ways to map Ela Prairie.  

The forest preserves around Chicago are tricky to map because there's often a mix of named features or nature reserve areas inside the larger so-called "forest preserves."  The forest preserves usually have fairly clear boundaries, but the officially named features inside the preserves, even though they might qualify as nature reserves in their own right, rarely have fixed boundaries and usually relate to specific landuse areas, like Ela Prairie.  The prairie itself has no official boundary so far as I can tell, other than being part of the larger Cuba Marsh Forest Preserve.  If I recall correctly, the previous edit actually showed it as a separate reserve apart from Cuba Marsh FP, with Cuba Marsh FP ending at Ela Road.  All the information that I have been able to find shows Cuba Marsh FP as encompassing Ela Prairie. One could probably map Ela Prairie as a smaller reserve inside the Cuba Marsh FP, but that might give it a more official boundary than it actually has.  

Given the uncertainties, I opted to tag it as a landuse and adjust the Cuba Marsh FP boundary to encompass Ela Prairie, while leaving the GNIS data in place, assuming it applies to Ela Prairie alone.  If you think there's a better way to map it, let me know.

Scott
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:36:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:27:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:35:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
luiswoo (2021-01-28 19:46:54+00:00): Ага.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:21:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
luiswoo (2021-01-28 19:56:01+00:00): И Путин такой молодой, 
И юный Селегр впереди!
luiswoo (2021-01-28 19:57:12+00:00): Не удалось открыть файл.
luiswoo (2021-01-28 20:09:42+00:00): Кстати, будь те добры, не трогать названия на других языках, -- они вас не касаются. Это международный проект.
Oksion (2021-01-29 06:44:24+00:00): Добрый день Sesil Ссылочка не работает на гугл диск, но да ладно, дело не в этом. что насчёт тегов, я за что что-бы оставить дворец "путина" в local_name, я лично могу высказать два аргемента в пользу, ну во первых это действительно местное "простонародное" название данной резиденции, которое на картах ОСМ вообще-то с 2011 года висит и никому не мешало до некоторых пор. Если спросить у жителей близлежайших сёл как проехать к дворцу путина, то дорогу точно покажут, а если спросить как к резиденции в Просковеевке, то реально поймут не все. Во вторых путин в данном случае это имя нарицательное, собирательный образ так сказать, и никоим образом не раскрывает чьих-то персональных данных.
spiregrain (2021-02-09 09:46:37+00:00): Apologies, I had misspelled it in a JOSM 'Custom Present', and put it all over the area for a couple of weeks.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-29 08:34:07+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Non è una buona pratica mettere il tag source su un elemento. Meglio mettere la fonte nel changeset (cosa che hai fatto). Ciao, Andrea
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-01 09:42:54+00:00): Vous faites des doublons de vos propres ajouts https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84358509
Peut-être est-il préférable d’arrêter un peu la contribution et de répondre aux gens qui vous écrient non ? OSM c'est une communauté d'êtres humains :)