piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2022-03-07 20:50:05+00:00): To są 3 apteki sklejone?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2178426824
drivec (2022-05-11 02:06:48+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
WoSoe (2022-03-07 06:03:36+00:00): Sorry Donnerstagswanderer,

hast du meine bisherigen Kommentare nicht gelesen oder verstanden?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1190087

Warum stapelst du weiterhin landuse übereinander?

Gruß
WoSoe
mueschel (2022-03-09 10:09:17+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here. There are many nodes with strange tags that don't look like they should be in OSM, e.g.

Eat = B
FN = F
Position = C
Tampon = Oui

Could you check and fix this?
user_5359 (2022-03-12 07:17:16+00:00): Hello! I have remove all the unknown tags.
silversurfer83 (2022-03-07 16:41:17+00:00): Hi. I'm mapping quite a few playgrounds in this area (until now, mostly in nearby Korbach and surroundings, but Willingen isn't that far). Just for the sake of continuity, I'd like to suggest that you maybe use the same tagging scheme, which would be "playground=WHATEVERPLAYGROUNDFEATURE" on nodes that are playground features like it is described in this Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
Best wishes
silversurfer83
lyctkel (2022-03-07 18:16:30+00:00): Hi silversurfer83,
danke für die Korrektur. Ich kann gerade nicht mehr ganz nachvollziehen, wie es zu dieser seltsamen Syntax gekommen ist. Ich nehme an, es waren https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9559151363 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9559151362 gemeint.
Ich habe es nun hoffentlich korrekt eingetragen.
Gruss aus den Niederlanden,
lyctkel
silversurfer83 (2022-03-10 19:31:32+00:00): Alles gut :)
Grüße ins Upland und die Niederlande
ChillyDL (2022-03-10 02:21:19+00:00): Hello Chris Schultz, thanks for your edit! Could you add your sources, too? Thanks and greetings
Chris Schultz (2022-03-26 20:12:43+00:00): Hello Chilly,
I am currently living in the area and pass by this neighborhood every day. All the buildings have been built during the last year. Once the satelite images are updated, they will confirm the map changes.
ChillyDL (2022-03-27 13:11:44+00:00): I am sure they will! Thanks for explaining. For other mappers to understand better, it is great to add the source to your edit summary or, even better, to the individual data sets using source=. I added "source=survey" for those houses now.
Happy mapping!
map per (2022-03-16 09:12:12+00:00): Hallo David Rasp,

Wohngebiete sollten in OSM nur mit Häusern bebaute Gebiete und keine Felder einschließen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). Zudem ist Hochmutting bereits als landuse=farmyard eingezeichnet und ein landuse=residential sollte deshalb nicht zusätzlich eingezeichnet werden.
Ich hab das Wohngebiet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037823899) deshalb wieder gelöscht.

Viele Grüße
map per
Lee Carré (2022-03-07 02:08:54+00:00): Ugh, still with the giant bboxes for only a few nodes.
redd (2025-08-09 12:19:14+00:00): Hallo Rümpelschwab und andere Interessierte,
es sieht so aus, dass diesem Changeset die Einfahrt fälschlicherweise ins Gebäude verschoben wurde.

Ich gehe davon aus, dass es sich um einen Fehler handelt, der wieder korrigiert werden sollte.

Grüße,

redd
joost schouppe (2022-03-16 13:13:54+00:00): Hey Ruben,
Hoe verhoudt zich deze fietsbrug tot de Fontainestraat? Mij lijkt het dat het westelijk stuk hier verwijderd is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889584138/history#map=19/51.08603/3.78250
Ook hoe dit segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040815508 in het geheel past is me niet helemaal duidelijk; maar op basis van meest recente beelden en strava zou ik denken dat het al open is.
Ruben Van de Velde (2022-03-16 13:27:55+00:00): @joost: ik passeer er binnenkort nog eens en zal wat foto's nemen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040815508 mag zeker weg; dat is het laatst overgebleven deel van de vorige brug, dat intussen afgebroken is (vergelijk bv met luchtfoto's van AIV <=2020).
joost schouppe (2022-03-16 13:46:34+00:00): Merci! Ik heb die weg weer verwijderd
Ruben Van de Velde (2022-03-22 08:22:50+00:00): Fotocollectie: https://imgur.com/a/xcoI9aG
De aansluitingen van de parking van Volvo moet ik nog eens van dichterbij bekijken.
user_5359 (2022-03-15 10:28:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9558287070. What is the meaning of this node (only name is defined).
DENelson83 (2022-03-06 21:44:27+00:00): PierZen, before you comment on this changeset, you must know that with this changeset and the one of mine just after that restoring the Île aux Coudres section to the Saint Lawrence River Middle Estuary, you must be made aware that this is as far as I am willing to go.  As far as I am concerned, this relation is now in its final state.
amadvance (2022-03-06 22:48:15+00:00): Ciao gmisterio,

Ho visto che hai fatto modifiche al sentiero del Cantedoldo. Presumo che tu lo abbia fatto con una tua traccia GPX. In realtà la mappatura precedente era migliore confrontandola con la mappa StravaHeatmap. E' una mappa fatta da centinaia o più tracce degli utenti Strava. E' sempre bene usare questa mappa quando si correggono sentieri in quanto molto più affidabile della singola traccia.

Adesso ho risistemato e dovrebbe andare bene.

Ho visto che hai anche marcato parte del sentiero come "bicycle=permissive"  invece che "=yes". C'è una qualche ragione particolare ?

Ciao,
Andrea
gmisterio (2022-03-07 09:35:55+00:00): Ciao, mi fa piacere che hai controllato il mio lavoro.
È permessive perché è un sentiero CAI che passa in un centro abitato su mulattiera pedonale nel tratto finale.
amadvance (2022-03-07 18:38:50+00:00): Ciao gmisterio,

In questo caso direi che il bicycle=yes è più corretto. In pratica, se ci sono cartelli che  indicano un divieto di passaggio si mette =no, altrimenti vale la regola che è permesso il transito delle bici, come in tutte le mulattierie e sentieri, e quindi =yes. Il permissive è usato solo in casi molto particolari, come indicato in: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Biciclette, in pratica si mette in proprietà private quando il proprietario concede il passaggio a piedi o in bicicletta, ma non ad altri veicoli.

Mi sono permesso di correggere.

Ciao, e scusa lo spiegone :)
maro21 (2022-03-09 19:42:25+00:00): Naprawdę apteka ma taką nazwę?
adammek54 (2022-03-10 08:01:09+00:00): To błąd. Najprawdopodobniej jest to apteka wewnątrz zakładu, a nie ogólnodostępna. Usuwam
maro21 (2022-03-09 19:45:28+00:00): Skoro apteka otworzyła się ponownie, to wystarczy odkomentować "disused:" i w ten sposób zachowuje się historię obiektu.
user_5359 (2022-03-07 14:08:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9559210437 (one of 76 nodes). What is the meaning of the tag Jacaranda = mimosifolia?
Zalitoar (2022-03-08 06:10:29+00:00): I already deleted in changeset #118222031 that tag created by mistake. Thanks user_5359 !
SomeoneElse (2022-03-06 23:50:33+00:00): This is a continuation of the previous changeset, "Footpaths etc. near Ampleforth, from survey 9/2/2022, tr8553b".
maro21 (2022-03-09 20:32:52+00:00): Usunąłem tę aptekę. Czy apteka jest otwarta można sprawdzić na https://rejestrymedyczne.ezdrowie.gov.pl/ra/search/public;pharmacyName=Przy%20Przychodni;pharmacyCity=Wroc%C5%82aw
maro21 (2022-03-09 19:54:48+00:00): Wystarczyło zmienić nazwę.
kapazao (2022-03-07 00:12:53+00:00): Se me olvidó indicar que también hay cambios en la zona de Tarifa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118176475
Iain I (2022-03-06 22:48:58+00:00): Residential speed limit changes in your area:

As of May 31, 2021, the speed limit along LAKE BONAVISTA DR SE at 1540 LAKE BONAVISTA DR SE will be 50 km/h.

Speed limit updates are not accurate.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118176561
Iain I (2022-03-06 23:10:23+00:00): I have verified three roads Lake Bonavista Drive, Lake Bonaventure drive and  Acadia Drive all have incorrect speed limits. This is a very large change set that appears to be inaccurate.
Iain I (2022-03-06 23:12:11+00:00): Breaside is also inaccurate. The city of Calgary provides a tool to verify speed limits.

https://www.calgary.ca/transportation/roads/traffic/traffic-safety-programs/residential-speed-limits.html
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-03-07 05:20:31+00:00): You (or somebody local) can take care of most of the inner roads, but thanks for providing the link to verify speeds, and I can help finding where it's either 40 or 50, especially in downtown (I can remember finding 50 on the larger streets) or some neighbourhoods where I've been. I'm from the Edmonton area by the way. Edmonton also has a similar verification tool for finding where it's 40; Edmonton adapted a 40 km/h default three months after Calgary did (May 31, 2021)
Iain I (2022-03-07 13:01:36+00:00): Can you revert this change? I don't think it is a good approach for you to make massive changes like this only to leave it to locals to fix your mistakes. This change is very large and not always related to each other. It should have been broken into smaller change sets. I don't see the reasoning for you to leave this for others to fix
user_2066394 (2022-03-07 12:03:52+00:00): Auf welchen Wegen fahren die innerhalb des Geländes?
Xkrcl (2022-03-07 22:51:05+00:00): Es gibt einigermaßen befestigte Schotterwege, an einer Stelle ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118176613#map=18/48.09755/11.26737 ) führt der Fußweg per Brücke über so eine "Straße"; das Gelände selbst ist jedoch für die Öffentlichkeit nicht wirklich zugänglich, das macht es schwer, die Wege zu kartographieren.
user_2066394 (2022-03-08 19:57:15+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/378033390
Der müsste doch noch relevant sein (eingetragen mit access=private)?
Xkrcl (2022-03-08 22:53:11+00:00): ok, ich habe ihn mal wiederhergestellt. Teile scheinen mir noch zu passen, vielleicht war ich etwas übereifrig :) Allerdings gibt es da viele Fahrspuren, und möglicherweise ist der Weg auch gewandert.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-07 13:54:05+00:00): Porque você deletou a via interna que existia aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6936378980 ?
O2 amb (2022-03-07 15:18:15+00:00): Pois é uma caminho privado, sem acesso de nenhuma forma pública.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-07 15:39:02+00:00): Este projeto não se destina a apenas mapear o que é público.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-13 15:41:06+00:00): via interna retornada.
Allison P (2022-04-13 05:23:15+00:00): Check the name on this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037835433

---

Traduzido por máquina:
Verifique o nome sobre isso: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037835433
Tapet (2022-03-08 20:46:03+00:00): Hallo, ist die Packstation nicht schon als Node im Rewe eingezeichnet?
joel1972 (2022-03-08 21:22:16+00:00): Danke Tapet, als ich die Packstation eingezeichnet habe, hatte ich den anderen Eintrag nicht gesehen oder er wurde mir nicht angezeigt. Ich habe den ersten Eintrag angepasst und erweitert und den neuen entfernt.
Piskvor (2022-03-07 17:40:17+00:00): Ahoj,
Bing nemá moc detailní mapy - v Praze je lepší mapovat podle městského ortofota: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:%C4%8Cesko/freemap#Ortofotomapy_IPR_Praha

Jinak pokud mapuješ obdélníkové budovy, je vhodné použít nástroj na jejich zarovnání (tuším klávesa Q), aby v mapě zhruba odpovídaly tvaru v reálu.

Každopádně dobrý začátek - jestli budeš mít zase cestu kolem té zahrádkářské osady, můžeš se mrknout, jak je tam napojená ta pěšina od východu? Díky.
S-zation (2022-03-07 01:06:53+00:00): Why did you revert this? Following your own source and ConnDOT maps, CT 82 is a "minor arterial" from CT 9 to Saybrook Road. It does not meet expressway classification.

https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/DOT/documents/dpolicy/policymaps/fcl/pdf/060fcl.pdf
Mashin (2022-03-07 04:53:43+00:00): Sorry, there was a recent road reclassification in CT and I am just trying to prevent it from getting mixed up again. 
Maybe you are right. Try asking Jack (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jnighan) what he thinks about that.
S-zation (2022-03-07 05:06:46+00:00): Ok, I'll send him a message
jnighan (2022-03-09 00:08:10+00:00): I think this should be tagged highway=motorway_link and oneway=no, rather than motorway (as it is tagged), trunk (as it was changed to), or secondary (as the CTDOT scheme would have it tagged). The documentation for motorway links allows for this, and this road serves no purpose besides entering/exiting Route 9.

For this road, I support breaking with the CTDOT scheme and documenting an exception on the wiki page. The function of this road aligns entirely with the OSM consensus on motorway links. I think any other tagging would overstate the function of this unnamed, controlled access state highway connector.

Any thoughts?
S-zation (2022-03-09 05:13:42+00:00): Motorway_link makes the most sense to me because the road is essentially serves as a long on/off ramp for route 9. The only reason I would be hesitant is because I've never seen an example of a such a long motorway_link for a 2+1 road
gscholz (2022-03-19 06:23:02+00:00): Hi Ching-Yi,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Japoatã"and "Neópolis"

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-36.81957&lat=-10.35196&zoom=11

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118177263

I have reverted it now. Please use JOSM if you edit relations to get proper warning messages if you try to upload such kind of errors.
Kind regards
Guido
elmoneto (2022-03-06 23:29:33+00:00): Ótimo trabalho, Pedro! :)
user_5359 (2022-03-07 05:51:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1037841197/history. I correct your key Name to name? But is this really the name or can only buses park here? Have a look on the key access:  motor_vehicle=no, bus=yes.
drivec (2022-05-11 01:53:55+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-13 15:43:57+00:00): porque reduziu a extensão de vias nesta região, como esta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1426869958 ?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-26 18:06:46+00:00): edição revertida, usuário não respondeu ao questionamento.
drivec (2022-05-11 01:53:49+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-07 06:24:48+00:00): All deleted!!!!
Please email data@openstreetmap.org
marczoutendijk (2022-03-07 11:31:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5749
tastrax (2022-03-07 03:44:13+00:00): Hi Ben - I have updated this for you. Best to have the extra details as description (rather than note). Some software will present description to users whilst note is generally a note for fellow mappers. I also updated the bridge between the sections of track. there is also no 'vehicle=' tag - its actually motor_vehicle.... which will usually be presented in the ID editor interface. Cheers
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-26 22:38:34+00:00): please dont duplicate highway like you did here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9559344281
santamariense (2022-03-07 01:42:40+00:00): Olá Lord45,
Antes de mais nada, bem vindo ao OSM. Infelizmente há vários problemas na tua edição. A começar pela fonte, se o google earth foi usado como fonte para edição, estamos violando direitos autorais da Google, porque ela não permite que usemos streetview, seus mapas (incluso o waze) e nem sequer suas imagens de satélite para que possamos atualizar o OSM [3].
Fora isso você apagou muita coisa, que acabou por quebrar relações. Sugiro fortemente que evite apagar objetos do mapa, até que tenha, com a experiência, maior noção do que está fazendo.
Por exemplo, você quebrou a relação do bairro Santa Rosa [1] provavelmente por achar que uma das peças não tinha utilidade alguma. Também vi que re-adicionou o bairro ao mapa com uma nova geometria [2]. Entendo que a intenção é corrigir a delimitação do bairro, porém para isso o correto é arrumar a geometria existente.
Também quebrou a (geometria do tipo) relação de outros 2 bairros e de 6 linhas de ônibus.
[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8504454
[2] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037849368
[3] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
gscholz (2022-03-19 06:20:30+00:00): Hi Ching-Yi,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Japoatã"and "Neópolis"

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-36.81957&lat=-10.35196&zoom=11

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118178726

I have reverted it now. Please use JOSM if you edit relations to get proper warning messages if you try to upload such kind of errors.
Kind regards
Guido
abakus_uploader (2022-03-07 23:31:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-07 02:38:17+00:00): golf=clubhouse was correct
Aniz Bajracharya (2022-03-07 02:42:43+00:00): Fixed and noted with thanks.
maraf24 (2022-03-07 20:57:17+00:00): Ta apteka przecież nie ma nazwy:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8696609554
Ponawiam pytanie - skąd bierzesz godziny otwarcia? W csioz ich nie ma.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-10 16:59:38+00:00): What is your source for this edit?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118179093 with Russian name rather than Polish here is really suspicious
Fil211 (2022-03-11 06:07:54+00:00): Все правки на польской территории вносятся на основании данных ресурса http://igrek.amzp.pl
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-11 10:33:39+00:00): Do you have any indicator that this names are currently in use?
Fil211 (2022-03-11 19:03:25+00:00): yes, local resident
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-11 19:06:48+00:00): Are you really claiming that primary local name for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9559419408 is in Russian? And not in Polish?

That is frankly not believable at all.
Fil211 (2022-03-11 19:12:19+00:00): Он поляк со знанием русского языка.

Во что вам верится или нет - это не мои проблемы.
Fil211 (2022-03-11 19:16:20+00:00): Кажется я поначалу не совсем понял ваш вопрос. Основное имя конечно на польском, но я не имею технической возможности его воспроизвести.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-07 01:38:13+00:00): 118177930 118177861 118177826 118174705 118174623 118170056 118169887 118169738 118166136 118166005 118165915 118165092 118165057 118164926 118164770 118136088 118135887 118129351 118128534 118127379 118127355 118127311 118127263 118147541
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-07 01:38:28+00:00): Sockpuppet of:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5585
omarsoukane 
bob2000
jodie1974
munger2002
barry_fortnite_2002
adam2011
larry_2002
noa2003
omarsouk
larson1974
adams22052003
magic 2001
daisy_2014
lusk_2014
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-07 01:39:04+00:00): This changeset reverts lusk_2014's edits.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-07 01:57:00+00:00): 118113917 118113882 118113875 118113307 118112757 118112731 by daisy_2014
Sockpuppet of:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5585
omarsoukane 
bob2000
jodie1974
munger2002
barry_fortnite_2002
adam2011
larry_2002
noa2003
omarsouk
larson1974
adams22052003
magic 2001
daisy_2014
lusk_2014
S-zation (2022-03-07 05:31:06+00:00): note: CT DOT marked these roads as "minor arterial" but they connect to nowhere. Ends at a "collector" road in North Haven. Does not make sense as secondary considering the road network.
jnighan (2022-03-19 23:47:26+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for pointing this out. I've changed Gay Street to tertiary to match Thompson Street -- this is consistent with their continuation towards Arrowdale Road in North Haven, and is closer to the ConnDOT scheme. I've also changed Mill Street back to secondary, as it connections CT-100 with CT-80, so there is no reason to stray from the scheme. I've made a note of this exception to the classification scheme on the wiki page -- feel free to do so in the future if you find more roads you feel should be changed from the ConnDOT scheme:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification#Exceptions_to_ConnDOT_Classification
nevw (2022-03-07 10:03:21+00:00): Please re-add the bicycle=designated tag.
Did you not read the tag…

source:bicycle	shared route declarations continue until the path ends OR a sign ends them. this is the continuance.
FuzzyJulz (2022-03-07 23:15:06+00:00): Yes, I did read it, however it is not the case, if you look at streetview for this it is clear this path is a footpath, and the cycleway is on the road as a shared path. This path also doesn't link properly onto any roads, and causes routing issues
nevw (2022-03-07 23:57:32+00:00): I notice you are likely an active biker from your edits so will leave to your better judgement and I am remote from the area.
The source tag should probably be deleted from the sections you have changed as it seems no longer relevant.
Allison P (2022-03-07 03:11:59+00:00): I was fine doing it when the footprints were in line with current aerials, but now I'm not so sure.
pertile (2022-03-07 15:17:22+00:00): Gracias Maxcool por tu agregado. Solo te comento que no deberías unir la manzana a las vías que la rodean, porque esas vías representan el eje de la calle con lo que estarías agregando parte de la calle a la manzana. Yo corregí en las 2 que agregaste. Saludos.
Warin61 (2022-03-07 22:04:39+00:00): Hi,
The relation 13899526 only has outters - no inners. So the tags can be placed on the outers and the relation removed.  Always better to use the simplest solution. 

Humm looking at it again .. there is at least one water feature that should be made an inner .. so it is needed .. but not for every area.
Warin61 (2022-03-07 22:20:55+00:00): Changes made. I note that the grass areas in the prison have not been mapped.
kurisubrooks (2022-03-08 00:53:03+00:00): Hi there. I'm still getting the hang of relations, but my intent was to map multiple connected grassy areas on campus, but split them into a multi-polygon because of the size of the area (for maintainability) in the future. I'll keep this in mind for the future as it seems you've already made the necessary fixes. Thank you!
Warin61 (2022-03-08 03:14:14+00:00): Practice? 
For instance you have grassland - Way: 1037499472 .. that should be a relation with inners for the tree and heath areas. Relying on the order a render draws them may not work for all renders. This area could be incorporated with the relationship you made here.
kurisubrooks (2022-03-08 05:54:46+00:00): I see! For the wood areas over top the heath areas, would I first make a relation of the woods being inner for the heath, and then that relation as an inner for the grassland?
Warin61 (2022-03-08 06:41:06+00:00): If the tree area are enclosed by the heath then yes they should be inner in a heath relation. 
If the tree area touches the heath area outer boundary then the heath area does not enclose the tree area - the heath boundary should go, possibly the long way, around the tree area. 
This comes down to a 'rule' - multipolygon relations outer ways should not share segments with other members (or the same relation).
KingKull2112 (2022-03-07 03:56:34+00:00): I also didn't do the entire line, I don't want to make an edit too large.
MxxCon (2022-03-07 06:56:11+00:00): Hello.
Each mta bus stop also has a unique 6 digit number that can be mapped with "ref=" tag. They are written on those rectangular boxes with maps and schedules hanging on each bus stop's pole. Alternatively, you can find them on mta's bustime website. They are not a requirement, but nice to have. 👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118180598