piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2021-02-21 00:02:59+00:00): Hello 폴리싱가이즈 and thanks for your interest in OpenStreetMap.
If you want to add your business you'll need to add the correct tag for your business.  https://openstreetmap.community/ suggests that there is a Telegram community at https://t.me/osmKorea - maybe try asking for help there?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-02-21 00:03:17+00:00): 304 / 5000
Translation results
폴리싱 가이즈 안녕하세요. OpenStreetMap에 관심을 가져 주셔서 감사합니다.
비즈니스를 추가하려면 비즈니스에 맞는 태그를 추가해야합니다. https://openstreetmap.community/는 https://t.me/osmKorea에 텔레 그램 커뮤니티가 있다고 제안합니다. 도움을 요청 해보세요.
친애하는,
앤디
Régis Vrignaud (2021-09-27 14:14:04+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de passer rue du gué des joncs à St Georges de Montaigu, mais je n'ai pas vu la boulangerie ? est-ce une erreur ? Merci. Cordialement Régis Vrignaud
Flrbrmd (2021-10-04 19:54:10+00:00): Bonjour Régis,
C'est surement une erreur de manipulation de ma part. Il n'y avait aucune boulangerie à cette endroit au moment où je l'ai cartographié.
Merci de votre vigilance :)
Régis Vrignaud (2021-10-05 05:54:00+00:00): Bonjour, ok Pas de soucis, ça arrive!
s8evq (2021-02-14 20:11:46+00:00): Hey mv420305, bedankt voor je edit! Kleine tip: het is niet nodig om ook een naam toe te voegen "name=bench". Ik heb die alvast verwijderd.
BCNorwich (2021-02-14 18:46:15+00:00): Hi, I've unjoined the footpath from Fuzziecombe Wood. 

There are several instances of name=??? with natural=wood on a node. Please be advised that a wood should be drawn as an area, ref:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood

Way: Green Walk (903760947) looks like it should join the road Way: 25333615 at the west. Green Walk is also joined to the edge of the scrub area Way: 904574012 but look like it really lies down the centre of the area. That area actually looks like a grassed ride rather than scrub.

The above problems noted after looking at only the first twenty ways. There's more than a hundred more that may contain errors.

Regards Bernard.
4004 (2021-02-15 01:35:09+00:00): а если разные полигоны разве отношение не надо?
Pavelfantik (2021-02-15 18:26:58+00:00): надо было просто убрать building	construction  и оставить только part
4004 (2021-02-15 21:03:32+00:00): так все равно ж нужен или общий контур или отношение.
пока без разницы, может вообще другой проект
Pavelfantik (2021-02-18 09:11:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907090142
BCNorwich (2021-02-14 19:19:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Could you say how you've determined this as a village with a population of 65 when there seems to be not one dwelling here? Is it a historic village site?

Regards Bernard.
trigpoint (2021-02-15 17:00:06+00:00): Fiction reverted
trigpoint (2021-02-15 16:59:42+00:00): Fiction reverted
trigpoint (2021-02-15 16:59:33+00:00): Fiction reverted
SafetyIng (2021-02-15 00:47:54+00:00): Hey,
mir sind mind. 2 Fehler aufgefallen:
1. Bijou Brigitte (880797664, v2) - hat wohl ausversehen ein building=yes bekommen
2. Das Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz Sachsen-Anhalt - Fachbereich Hygiene (32009846, v9) - sollte kein goverment=healtcare bekommen, es ist kein Gesundheitsamt....
user_11485818 (2021-02-19 21:56:21+00:00): Hey,
danke für deine Hinweise!
1. Das ist tatsächlich ein Versehen, ist nun korrigiert.
2. Guter Hinweis, nehme ich wieder raus. Hatte nicht bedacht, dass damit auch Gesundheitsämter gemeint sein können.
Besten Gruß und ein schönes Wochenende.
SafetyIng (2021-02-19 22:57:44+00:00): Immer wieder gerne. Wenn was auffällt auch anders herum! 

Zu 2. ich kannte es nur für Gesundheitsamt. :D 
Ich bin am überlegen, was da besser passen würde - ggf. public_safety ?
timmito (2021-02-14 18:52:53+00:00): Hallo Schwoijer und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Bitte beachten, dass bei Namen in OSM gemischte Groß- und Kleinschreibung, mit Großschreibung für den ersten Buchstaben eines Wortes, verwendet wird. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
trigpoint (2021-02-15 16:59:15+00:00): Fiction reverted
mvexel (2021-03-30 15:37:52+00:00): If you mark a way as highway=construction, routing applications interpret that as impassable. I removed the highway=construction tagging and for now marked the ways as `trunk` but arguably they are motorway (freeway grade) there.
TheConductor (2021-03-30 15:47:15+00:00): Hey, good to know. Thanks for making that correction. I'll come back in when they finish that up this summer and make the change to motorway.
mvexel (2021-03-30 15:52:56+00:00): Hi, thanks for your response! Actually I already did, in a subsequent change, since the surrounding parts of Bangerter Hwy were already `motorway`. I was recently there and captured some Kartaview imagery: https://kartaview.org/details/3471873/1773/track-info
TheConductor (2021-03-30 16:00:56+00:00): The imagery is great! I'm happy to finally see a long-er stretch of motorway along Bangerter. It's been a long time in the making. Hopefully funding will be indentified for MVC sooner rather than later.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 18:35:33+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Have you checked this in person, or are you just basing the fact that these are bridleways on OS maps? Remember you can't copy other map data into OSM.
In terms of how things are rendered, that depends on which map display you use.
If you want to keep the track type (or service road, or whatever) then there are designation tags you can use, see here for details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_bridleways
GSN RÉPARATION MÉCANIQUE AUTOMOBILE (2021-02-14 18:05:53+00:00): حي مالك بن نبي حائطة 1444
Cité malek ben nabi Ilot 1444
user_5359 (2021-02-15 05:20:10+00:00): Hello!
You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set (without any OSM key). 
NomAS	Mabuku
NomCAC	Vulengi
NomCAC_1	Mukili
NomZS	Kalunguta
OBJECTID	0
OBJECTID_1	82
Shape_Area	1.86558172319E-5
Shape_Le_1	0.0217340036315
Shape_Leng	0.0
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
Piotr Strębski (2023-09-02 06:37:37+00:00): Hej, ta droga: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343168762#map=16/52.0235/21.0745&layers=N chyba jest do usunięcia na podstawie obecnych zdjęć z Geoportalu, niczego nie widać, a także jest uwaga, że tam niczego nie ma. Staram się nie ruszać czyichś wyrysowań, jako że może mają lepsze rozeznanie w istnieniu obiektu. Pozdrowienia
syntex (2025-07-27 11:49:44+00:00): ok
BCNorwich (2021-02-14 18:58:17+00:00): Hi I've correct nested multipolygon by removing the water tagged line around the islet and placing the islet as an inner in Relation: 7845750,

For more info and examples on nested multiplygons please see:-https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-02-14 19:06:24+00:00): Unjoin tree row from the boundary line. Make gap in hedge and move it off of track.
JLZIMMERMANN (2021-09-24 14:31:56+00:00): bonjour,
quelle est ta source pour éditer le chemin des canaux ?
eggie (2021-02-14 19:58:12+00:00): Hi Kartenkarsten Please decrease your mapping area.
Greetz,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 20:40:05+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
The road that you changed has been mapped that it was a residential road under construction (highway=construction, construction=residential), and you've made it a service road.
From aerial imagery it looks like residential road might be most appropriate, but say you've surveyed it, so happy to go with your judgement there.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 20:43:24+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this, it all looks good to me
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:12:08+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
Similar to the one before, this still has the construction tag set as residential, and that should be removed whether or not you leave this as service.
zstadler (2022-02-22 18:11:50+00:00): כיוון שיש שני "מעלה זרון", לרכב ולרגל,  יש צורך לתת להם שמות שונים. באופן זה ברור שאין כאן טעות
zstadler (2022-05-26 11:13:39+00:00): Fixed - name restored
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:24:37+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this, it looks good to me.
I agree that a different, named road leading to houses should be residential, not driveway.
mueschel (2021-02-15 13:40:56+00:00): Please read and follow the import guidelines before dumping any datasets into the OSM database: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
eggie (2021-02-14 19:21:38+00:00): Dag Casualminsk,

Je wijziging is niet correct. Alle adresdata is import vanuit het Kadaster en kan beter niet gewijzigd worden. De format van de postcode klopt niet meer. Geen spatie toevoegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-14 19:55:50+00:00): BAG data hersteld..
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:25:51+00:00): Looks good. Best to remove the "construction=residential" tag as well as changing the highway value.
Kalepom (2021-03-20 23:34:03+00:00): Bonjour, 
Un des panneaux d'information modifié dans ce changeset est situé sur les rempart du château. Le point semblait au bon endroit sur la carte. À moins qu'il ait été déplacé ou retiré, il ne semble pas avoir de raison de le placer sur la tour LU. :)
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:28:09+00:00): Looks good
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:30:50+00:00): Looks good too
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:32:12+00:00): Looks good too
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:32:59+00:00): Looks good too
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:33:27+00:00): Looks good too
PPete2 (2021-02-16 11:10:36+00:00): Consecutive Reverts of all CS of user "ionutalexandrustoian" around Wartberg/Krems. Revertet by CS 99374929, for Reasons see CS 98447156
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:35:41+00:00): On this one, you've left this bit:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/750300811
as a service road, I think it should be a residential road too, as it seems to be going through houses and connecting other residential roads together.
(Perhaps these last few changes could have been in one changeset, updating the names of several roads.)
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-15 16:40:15+00:00): Salut, le access=yes n'est pas vraiment utile sur les parking à vélo, tendance à considérer que c'est le cas par défaut et plutôt noter ceux qui sont résersés, quand c'est le cas !
à plus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99262771
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-15 16:40:39+00:00): il peut-être intéressant de relever le nombre de vélo qui peuvent être attachés :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99262771
Soniacdt40 (2021-02-17 07:28:10+00:00): Oui, j'y ai pensé après coup.... je ferai mieux la prochaine fois :-)
Soniacdt40 (2021-02-17 07:28:43+00:00): C'est noté pour le access-yes !
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:38:19+00:00): Does this path meet the bridleway at all before its eastern end?
It seems a little odd that they run very close and parallel for several hundred metres, or is there something between them?
Gareth Thomas (2021-02-15 11:16:54+00:00): Yes what it is, there is the formal public right of way , bridal path that runs one side of a line of protected trees. On the estate side the planning consent required them to install a footpath as part of the landscaping requirements for the estate. So effectively two paths one is the public right of way and follows that route the estate path follows nearby then runs into the estate at Thompson Way. Hope this makes sense!
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:38:20+00:00): That makes sense, fair enough, just double checking
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:44:00+00:00): Your tag for "basin" of "stormwater" isn't listed on the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:basin?uselang=en-GB
But has been used about 600 times in the UK, so maybe the wiki needs updating with a description of what's meany by this.
I don't know anything about this pond, so don't know if any of those three tags listed (which make up 92% of usage) would be suitable.
Gareth Thomas (2021-02-15 11:13:23+00:00): Yes , i copied the other basin on our estate that was already present. Basically these ponds are constructed to take the water from drains on the highways and property gutters into these ponds . They refer to them as balancing or attenuation pools. Its a way of getting ground water off site i believe rather than allowing water to enter the public drainage systems etc..
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:30:16+00:00): Great, that sounds alright then
4004 (2021-02-15 01:06:06+00:00): стоило скопиравать основное имя и сохранить ё
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 22:45:01+00:00): Similar to a previous one, you've left the construction=residential tag on this, which should be removed now that it's complete.
Gareth Thomas (2021-02-15 11:11:09+00:00): Thanks I have removed the construction tag. Thanks Gareth
Carnildo (2021-02-16 03:41:02+00:00): The most common way to map a business inside a building is to add a point with the business information; a more detailed method is the Simple Indoor Tagging scheme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging

Drawing one building over another just confuses everyone involved.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:04:27+00:00): This edit was good, but shortly afterwards you added another bit of grass that overlaps this. These should be merged (select both, right click, merge).
Gareth Thomas (2021-02-15 11:09:41+00:00): Yes ok sorry . Will edit this to be merged. Thank you!
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:12:01+00:00): Hi, quite minor, but you have the path connected to the fence here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8370801609
I assume that the fence continues south east for a short distance (right click the point, continue line).
Then add the appropriate feature where the path and fence cross (gate or whatever), see here for options: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier#Access_control_on_highways_.28e.g._for_blocking_a_path_or_road.29
Gareth Thomas (2021-02-15 11:28:45+00:00): The fence is being removed as we speak. It was a temporary chain link fence for security whilst the play area was constructed. The play area is now completed. There is a basket ball court tarmac and play equipment on the site. There is fencing around the basketball court
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:14:21+00:00): Looks good. You mention in the changeset description that these are tarmac. That detail can be added to the path, under surface ("asphalt" is used for tarmac).
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:16:55+00:00): Mostly good, you connected the path to the road, but had also connected the residential area and grass to the road. I've fixed that for you here.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:21:48+00:00): Looks good
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:26:22+00:00): Thanks for adding this.
At the moment it's a dead end (which could well be accurate), but it also goes very close to Daffodil Drive and Redwing Close, but you haven't connected it to either of those. If there is connection then that should be added to aid routing.
Also, it was connected to the residential area, so I've disconnected it for you.
Gareth Thomas (2021-02-15 11:38:48+00:00): Yes at the moment it stops dead. The planning application plans shows that it it to continue to the centre of the estate after annd above Buddlleia Avenue. Its currently not done nor under construction. We are advised they plan to finish off the path way in coming months so for now it just stops!
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 12:03:10+00:00): Ah ok, and is there connection to it from the roads it goes near?
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:29:18+00:00): Looks good.
Not really from this changeset, but you've got this bit of grass
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907115273
mostly attached to the paths around it.
Opinions differ on whether this is best practice (personally I think that it should not be connected and should instead be accurately mapped to the outline of the grass, where possible).
But best to either have it all connected or all disconnected, rather than a mixture.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 19:05:38+00:00): Mostly good, you had the roads connected to the grass though so I've disconnected that for you
vasony (2021-03-17 20:59:48+00:00): Szia!

Melyik épület a Kossuth ház galéria?
Mert most vagy 15 épületre ráraktad.

Tamás
utvonalfelmeresek (2021-08-09 05:54:05+00:00): Upsz ezt a jelzésedet csak most vettem észre. Véletlenül kijelölve maradhatott az összes, amikor a házszám mellé az utcanevet is felvittem, ahogy kérted :)
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 19:10:45+00:00): Hi, noexit is for when it's not possible to continue by any mode of transport (see the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit )
So in these places it does not seem to be suitable, as they are connecting to another road or a path.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8374458631/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7015660271/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8370771512/
If it isn't possible to get between those places then a barrier of some description should be tagged instead.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 19:17:22+00:00): This looks good
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 19:03:39+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit. It looks good to me. If the construction area is bigger than just where the building is then you could add an area for that.
ezekielf (2021-02-14 19:50:11+00:00): Oops. Meant to set the source as this news article, not Esri Wordl Imagery:
https://www.mynbc5.com/article/wreckage-of-burned-covered-bridge-removed-from-vermont-river/35490019
dgitto (2021-02-15 06:16:45+00:00): Ciao, ho corretto e inserito i contatti (presi dal sito web).
Si chiama quindi "Via Luigi Scuderi"? che fonti abbiamo? E c'è un'altra Via Scuderi subito più a nord (altra traversa di Viale della Regione). Come si chiama quella? e a chi sono intitolate.
Grazie
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 19:01:51+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change.
I was going to ask why you deleted the service road, but you've since put it back, so this all looks good to me.
cafeconleche (2021-08-23 17:57:07+00:00): ¡Hola! En este conjunto de cambios le has quitado la etiqueta "junction=roundabout" a varias rotondas, lo cual no me parece correcto ya que sin esta etiqueta dejarían de considerarse rotondas. ¿Has quitado la etiqueta por error o hay algún motivo para ello?
cdavila (2021-08-30 13:46:11+00:00): Hola
Disculpa el retraso en contestar, el mensaje me entró en una carpeta con no miro con frecuencia. He rectificado los cambios en un par de rotondas, que efectivamente había quitado la etiqueta por error. Otros cambios son correctos, ya que no son rotondas aunque tenían esa etiqueta.
cafeconleche (2021-08-31 11:13:30+00:00): Perfecto, gracias. Acabo de corregir yo también algunas que sé personalmente que son rotondas (p.ej.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16099575), pero diría que hay más. Si te parece bien voy a revisar el conjunto de cambios e iré cambiando las que sepa seguro que lo son.
cdavila (2021-08-31 13:10:21+00:00): Claro que me parece bien. Pensé que había revisado todo el conjunto, pero ahora me doy cuenta que solo aparecen las primeras 20 vías en la página inicial del conjunto de cambios.
mapko (2021-02-27 22:36:23+00:00): Dobry den. Minimalne pol roka si vsimam, ze upravujete geometriu podla nejakych iluzii, nastavuje kategorie v rozpore so skutocnostou a ine nezmysly. 
Komu tato https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/48.4660/19.5496 uprava R2 prospela? 
Vyzyvam vas prestante nezmyselne upravovat mapu!
vojtechzaboril (2021-02-27 23:18:25+00:00): Dobry den, většinu těchto změn jsem dělal na základě katastrálních map. Kategorie a značení silnic neměním a určitě si je nevymýšlím. Na otázky typu "komu tato změna prospěla" reagovat nebudu. S pozdravem.
mapko (2021-02-27 23:29:29+00:00): Ak je v katastralnej mape zavadzajuci stav tak sup s nim do OSM? 
Ani nahodou sa vam nezadala tak upravena krizovatka nejako znetvorena?
ottwiz (2021-02-14 19:56:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99264394 ezt revertáltam vissza.
moreno96 (2021-02-14 21:33:49+00:00): سلام
لطفا از پرانتز در فیلد name استفاده نکنید.
فیلد جداگانه ای برای اسم شعبه تعیین شده به نام branch که میتونید داخلش اسم شعبه رو بنویسید
Hadise A (2021-02-14 23:45:58+00:00): سلام ممنون بابت تذکرتان
در صورت امکان اعلام فرمایید چگونه و از کجا فیلد branch را اضافه کنم ؟؟؟
یک فیلد به اسم brand موجود هست آیا این منظورتان هست؟؟
BraxtonWilddog (2021-02-14 19:59:42+00:00): (I meant 1)
Also, by smallest I mean by population.
charl3s (2021-02-14 20:13:29+00:00): Źródło danych: https://integracja.gugik.gov.pl/daneadresowe/
Warin61 (2021-06-02 01:06:17+00:00): Sport corrected to netball... not a good survey.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-14 20:21:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 91179509, 91180362, 91275473, 92326632, 93134318, 94718539, 97511482, 98170744, 98773685.
Cascafico (2021-02-16 11:04:06+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM Gigigig,

le denominazione dei sentieri sono effettivamente segnalate in loco? Se no, sono da rimuovere.
Gigigig (2021-02-16 16:12:59+00:00): I sentieri sono segnalati in loco
bompadiv (2021-02-16 17:23:11+00:00): la Opulis A era segnalata fino a pre covid ora meglio che ricontrollo per sicurezza nel caso sia stato rimosso anche causa mancata manutenzione, forse meglio considerare Opulis A e B come sentieri separati sebbene il primo sbuchi nel secondo ed erano considerati entrambi opulis ma creati in periodi diversi, opulis A è un'estensione del vecchio Opulis B, meglio per il momento considerare il principale vecchio Opulis B togliendo anche l'estensione A e B perl'appunto, in seguito verificherò se sono state apportate altre modifiche in loco
Gigigig (2021-02-16 17:30:10+00:00): Confermo che comunque è già stata apportata una modifica in loco ad A, una variante/scorciatoia del tracciato al fine di agevolare i meno esperti, essa non è stata ancora introdotta in mappa, bisogna prima effettuare una rilevazione con gps o tracciato da gpx, appena possibile
ma-rt-in (2021-02-16 07:28:23+00:00): Hallo,
wie kommst du zu dem Tag "stop_date"? Wie man bei taginfo sieht hast du den mal eben erfunden und das ist nicht sonderlich gut.
Ich werde den entfernen, da hja bereits in der Note das Datum erwähnt hast-
vg
ALu68 (2021-02-15 20:54:13+00:00): OSM ist keine Werbe- oder Handelsplatform - vielleicht findest du einen passenden Key für deine Stiftung.
!bm (2021-02-15 12:48:09+00:00): Hallo TGMChrist2,

es ist eine Rekonstruktion (der Fassade auf drei Seiten) und daher mE kein historic=castle. 

Wieso hast du tourism=attraction gelöscht? Das hattest du doch selbst in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99067687 als node 8413352835 hinzugefügt. (Diese deine Hinzufügung des Berliner Schlosses nahm ich zum Anlass, es beim letzten OSM-Berlin-Stammtisch 2021-02-12 [1, Protokoll folgt] zu diskutieren und folglich entsprechend zu switchen[2]).

Aus genannten Gründen revertiert in [3]

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Stammtisch/Protokolle
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99198421
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99310714

--besteGrüße!bm
Larmax (2021-02-15 19:59:13+00:00): Wasn't this also closed a while back?
Danub3 (2021-02-15 21:53:41+00:00): Similar to the shooting range, I only changed it to an area and marked the actual track. It was represented by a single node before.
Danub3 (2021-02-15 21:54:28+00:00): Sorry for the incorrect changeset comment! It should say "fixed" or "edited" instead of "added".