piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pio2_122 (2021-11-13 16:16:12+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za informację!

Dla jasności, nie są to dane zebrane przeze mnie, tylko poprawa po początkującym edytorze zza granicy (z kilku oddzielnych changeset'ów).
Poprawiałem głównie geometrię ścieżek (wg ortofoto), czy usuwałem zbędne opisy po niemiecku z tagu name (np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946619222/history).

Wspomniany punkt to również pokłosie tych poprawek. Nie byłem w stanie zweryfikować poprawności wszystkich danych, szczególnie tagów surface, tracktype, itp.
Pozostawiałem je bez zmian lub, jak w tym przypadku, przenosiłem je na nowe punkty/linie (najczęściej ze względu na poprawioną geometrię, czy usunięcie zdublowanych dróg, itp.).
Swoją drogą, wspomniane ścieżki zostały już dodane w 2009 r. (więc jak najbardziej, dużo mogło się przez ten czas zmienić).

W najbliższym czasie (ponieważ, obecnie jestem w trakcie poprawek jednej z własnych edycji :P), zgodnie z sugestią, usunę te ścieżki i bród.
pio2_122 (2021-11-13 17:21:16+00:00): ^update: Stosowny changeset wysłany - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113738799
grelus (2021-11-13 17:23:14+00:00): dzięki! pozdrawiam!
eggie (2021-05-25 08:03:16+00:00): Dag Gusted.. Houd er rekening mee als je zelf aan gebouwen gaat knutselen dat een volgende periodieke update resulteert in gebouwen op elkaar.
Wanneer iets niet klopt geef het door aan het kadaster. 
Ook niet naar de dakvorm kijken. Dat vertekent op een luchtfoto.
Wanneer iets een overkapping   is staat nooit in de BAG, maar kun je als building=roof intekenen. 
Gr eggie
Gusted (2021-05-25 15:08:01+00:00): Ah, building=roof, dat zocht ik! Ookal zijn de gebouwen in het echt aan elkaar verbonden en door dezelfde eigenaar gebruik zal het nu goed zijn met changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105300514 als je graag wilt kijken of ik niet weer wat fouts heb gedaan, alvast bedankt!
eggie (2021-05-25 15:23:01+00:00): Fouten maken we allemaal....  
Er wordt niemand iets kwalijk genomen. Volgens mij ziet het er perfect uit. 
gr eggie
Viajero Perdido (2021-05-24 22:01:06+00:00): I meant former, not latter.

And since both forms are legal, this isn't the dreaded tagging for the renderer, which deals in false tagging.  This is a bug workaround.
fs1wt9 (2021-05-24 22:18:31+00:00): Related note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2682085
user_1566574 (2021-06-22 19:21:07+00:00): Bonsoir Xavier,
Vous avez indiqué via 2 panneaux qu'un chemin était apparemment inaccessible, sauf riverains.
S'agit-il bien de ce chemin ? https://gribrouillon.fr/?sid=GkQjfHIM1a#16/46.7261/6.4060

Merci d'avance, cartographiquement. ;) 🗺️
xavier025 (2021-06-24 05:55:41+00:00): oui c est ca
user_1566574 (2021-06-24 06:17:04+00:00): Merci :) Je vais refléter ce changement sur le chemin, pour éviter aux logiciels de routage (ceux qui servent aux itinéraires) de l'utiliser.

Merci de vos contributions ! Si vous avez besoin d'aide dans le futur, ou avez des questions, n'hésitez pas !
Bonne journée :)
AgusQui (2021-05-29 04:08:40+00:00): Hola, quisiste corregir el recorrido del 333 en Boulogne? Cuál sería el recorrido correcto? Quedó un tramo inconexo sobre calle Matheu
canfe (2021-06-06 04:28:04+00:00): way 731904554 corrispondente a prato è diventata membro di una relazione con un solo membro, il che non ha senso.
Idem per way 946637940 solo membro di un campo di atterraggio al quale manca anche sport senza caratteristica fisica.
andgiors (2021-06-07 08:35:09+00:00): grazie delle osservazioni, posso farti qualche quesito?
la prima way mi sembra fosse già presente e io l'ho divisa in due per generare la seconda (che rappresenta l'area ufficiale di atterraggio all'interno di un prato di maggiori dimensioni), può essere che la relazione ci fosse già e sia stata "ereditata"? la devo rimuovere?
nella seconda way, atterraggio, non trovo il tag relativo a sport senza caratteristica fisica, e le descrizioni le ho copiate (ovviamente adattate al mio caso) dall'atterraggio del Monte Cavallaria. Come lo rendo completo e corretto?
Grazie mille
andgiors (2021-06-07 08:36:46+00:00): aggiungo: la descrizione dell'atterraggio è inserita nella relazione, posso sostituire detta descrizione alla sola way?
canfe (2021-06-08 06:51:02+00:00): Ho tolto le relazioni con un solo membro, mai da mettere.
Messo leisure = piste
Per ogni sport ci vuole "dove" lo si fa. Piscina, pista, building...
Mai copiare.
Leggere la wiki (c'è la storia di piste da mettere..)
Ora bisogna correggere anche da dove hai copiato.
L'area piknik si chiam davvero Cossiglia? o è il nome di una loclaità?
La pista di atterraggio non si chiama pista di atterraggio sennò anche la panchina si chiama panchina. Potrebbe chiamarsi Sandro Pertini...
La fattoria lì vicino ha un nome? sarebbe da ggiungere.
andgiors (2021-06-08 07:42:18+00:00): grazie.
dovrò migliorare la lettura, o l'interpretazione della wiki però ho guardato le tag (su TagFinder) e non condivido "piste" che mi pare sia da utilizzare per delle aree preparate su cui si pratica l'attività mentre qui siamo su un semplice prato. Per il dove: si pratica per aria l'attività, ho cercato ma non ho trovato descrizione idonea e ho quindi preferito non aggiungere di testa mia info sbagliate. Per questo ho cercato nei siti di volo piemontesi che conosco come fossero stati descritti e ho scelto da esempio quello che sembrava più completo.
Cossiglia è la località (quella erroneamente definita factory che ho modificato) e sia l'area pic-nic che l'atterraggio sono conosciuti così sia localmente che individuabili con le indicazioni stradali: nessuno dei due luoghi è "dedicato" a qualcuno. Per l'atterraggio ho quindi inserito la chiave description.
Migliorato anche alcune aree e point limitrofi, spero in modo coerente...
canfe (2021-06-08 15:35:13+00:00): Se non ci sono corsie delimitate allora potrebbe andare bene leisure=pitch
Guardati su
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dfree_flying
in basso a destra overpass che ti da una mappa di dove sono. Non allargarti troppo sennò ti banna per il troppo carico di lavoro.
Troverai altri casi (magari sbagliati! ma in mezzo magari c'è quello che sembra il più sensato)
Overpass è uno strumento molto utile.
andgiors (2021-06-08 15:45:06+00:00): grazie!
canfe (2021-06-08 16:00:13+00:00): Cossiglia: allora se l'area picnic si chiama così (potrebbe essere intitolata a Mazzini altrimenti) va bene così.
Se invece Cossiglia si riferisce a una locality (vedere wiki prima!) NON abitata va indicata a parte se ha abitanti si da da isolted dwelling ad hamlet...
Buon studio. Son un po' noioso ma son concetti che vanno assimilati subito perché si incontrano spesso.
canfe (2021-06-08 16:07:20+00:00): Infine: corretto il centro sportivo (errore di battitura) e cambiato tipologia all'elipad.
AgusQui (2021-05-29 04:11:38+00:00): Reverti los cambios que hiciste con el 60, no entendí que quisiste hacer, quedaron cortados los recorridos en la calle José C Paz en Tigre. Además cambiaste los nombres de los recorridos incorrectos, por ej el ramal Fleming ya no llega a Constitución.
Negreheb (2021-05-24 22:48:53+00:00): Kössen, not Kranzach, obviously...
tekim (2021-05-28 18:39:09+00:00): The trail from Bear Lake to the junction with the Flat Top Mountain Trail is certainly not surface=compacted - no surface treatment has been done.  I have been on this trail many times.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105253346
Mobayrick_T (2021-06-01 02:21:17+00:00): من افضل محلات الصيانة والتركيب.
ravali_78 (2021-05-26 03:59:55+00:00): Hi jajadalangin13,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with residential highway.Kindly check with way 652143654,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105323900.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105253914
Haris IRM-ED (2022-04-20 04:29:57+00:00): Hello PrasadC, Hope you have a nice day

It seems that some of the building data in 105253922 changeset have invalid geometries, so I decided to remove some of them and add new building data to fix them.

Thank you.. Happy Mapping
AgusQui (2021-05-25 03:54:33+00:00): Por favor preste mas atencion a sus ediciones, recuerde que mapeamos la realidad. Dibujo una autopista alrrededor del pueblo, hizo un puente kilometrico y extendio un hospital al tamaño del pueblo. Le recomiendo seguir el tutorial para familiarizarse con las herramientas. El cambio fue revertido.
5m4u9 (2021-05-25 06:34:04+00:00): hola, existe un error en colocar como area residencial a un terreno, se debería colocar place=plot
user_5359 (2021-05-27 03:44:29+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key edite_par?
clnhrn (2021-05-25 01:27:41+00:00): Sources: ESRI Imagery, USGS 3D Elevation
Glassman (2021-05-26 17:57:21+00:00): Thanks for changing to metric. It would have shown as a really tall peak!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105254607
dkiilerich (2021-05-26 19:39:22+00:00): Yeah too bad I didn't discover a new high point in Washington! :)

The UI for elevation didn't make it clear what units to use or how to specify them (I actually entered 5523' and it didn't complain about the apostrophe, instead stripping it silently).

I also wasn't sure if I should be entering elevation or if that would be derived from the coordinate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105254607
gendy54 (2021-06-05 13:26:50+00:00): Hello,
Je m'aperçois en faisant le tour des ZDS que tu as toutes revues (c'est cool) que la Guyane a 2 relations ZDS. L'autre c'est: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11741846#map=8/4.352/-52.773 qui me semble mieux puisqu'elle prend les eaux territoriales et pas l'autre. Je pense qu'il faut donc supprimer celle-ci.
gendy54 (2021-06-05 13:28:38+00:00): D'ailleurs tu ne l'as pas prise dans la super-relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11741663 que tu as crées. Mais peut-être que tu n'avais pas vu que tu avais fait un doublon.
Verdy_p (2021-06-06 18:08:07+00:00): non je n'ai pas fait de doublon dans ce changeset, ces 2 relations étaient là depuis bien longtemps avant.
j'en ai virée une (celle restreinte aux terres, j'ai gardé celle incluant les eaux territoriales).
Note qu'ici ce sont des modifs pour  détrailler les zones naturelles et landuse pays par pays, il y a eu un découpage d'un way utilisé aussi comme frontière de ZDS c'est pour ça que ça apparait ici, mais c'était là depuis longtemps, j'ai pu toucher aux deux sans m'en apercevoir, je n'ai pas revu l'historique pour savoir laquelle a été créée en doublon ou si l'une a été retaguée pour en faire une ZDS avec un changement de rôle (mais je ne vois pas à quoi servirait autrement la relation terrestre qui n'est rien d'autre que le département-région de Guyane (au plan des collectivités locales et non préfectoral car le préfet étend ses compétences sur toute la ZDS: région terrestre et région maritime). En métropole les régions et préfets de région n'ont pas compétence sur leur région maritime attenante, qui inclue les eaux touchant plusieurs régions locales, les ZDS leur régions maritimes, qui a terme devraient aussi disparaitre il me semble pour ne laisser que les ZDS
Verdy_p (2021-06-06 18:11:32+00:00): Note: la super-collection a depuis son origine référencé la ZDS de Guyane (celle avec les eaux territoriales), je ne l'avais pas oubliée. La relation seulement terrestre n'a jamais été une ZDS correcte de toute façon selon la législation. Peut-être que c'était une ancienne ébauche quand les eaux territoriales n'étaient pas encore tracées.
gendy54 (2021-06-06 19:02:12+00:00): Y a rien de grave. C'était juste pour te le signaler vu que tu avais modifié les deux. L'essentiel c'est qu'il n'en reste qu'une et la bonne.

Donat
user_5359 (2021-05-25 18:51:04+00:00): Hello! Please see the difference of the keys payment and fee. The first key describes how to pay, the second describes the amount to be paid.
okadatsuneo (2021-05-25 03:55:22+00:00): 町名・大字は"quarter"、小字レベルは"neighbourhood"を使いましょうと決まっていますので、こちらに合わせる方が望ましいと思います。
(hamletは現在は使用しないことになっています)
下記サイトも参照下さい。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging#Places
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:MLIT_ISJ/import2019_outline
hibagonsan (2021-05-25 13:23:06+00:00): こんにちは。コメントありがとうございます。このあたりの資料見ながらやっていたので曖昧になっていました。今後修正していきます。
https://www.okuminavi.jp/access/pdf/OSM_taguitiran.pdf
okadatsuneo (2021-05-25 13:50:24+00:00): そういうことでしたか。
了解しました。
よろしくお願いします。
ものによっては使い方が変わったりもしているので、気になるものはwikiも見てみて下さい。
user_5359 (2021-05-25 18:47:49+00:00): Hello (again)! Please use landcover instead of landvover. I have already corrected the error.
DUGA (2021-07-02 01:20:28+00:00): When there are multiple businesses sharing the same building, do not add the name of one of them.
user_5359 (2021-05-25 04:53:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ravali_78 (2021-05-26 03:47:05+00:00): Hi maning,
I have fixed the crossing building on residential highway.Kindly check with way 946669597,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105323296.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105256952
Kovoschiz (2021-05-25 10:59:31+00:00): 1. You shouldn't remove the `building=` if the area is also representing the structure. 
2. `man_made=wastewater_plant` is for treatment, not `man_made=pumping_station`.
Kovoschiz (2021-05-25 11:00:16+00:00): If it contains an address, it shouldn't be removed.
eversone (2021-05-25 11:14:15+00:00): its gone
Kovoschiz (2021-05-25 11:32:08+00:00): The building is gone, but not the address
nevw (2021-05-25 05:59:58+00:00): Changeset comment should read from A2 to Alt A2 as sign posted on road.
Jakka (2021-05-25 09:31:38+00:00): Lijkt ok. Toch effen aandacht bij access=no niets toegelaten maar er staat motor_vehicle=yes op dit deel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946674153 Vermoed met highway construction dat routeplanner er niet opgaat .... ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105258310
tastrax (2021-06-17 02:49:18+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Joel Amos (2021-05-28 16:44:57+00:00): Hey, thanks for this change. It's funny because I actually puzzled for a very long time over this section trying to determine whether there was a real path to the left, even going so far as to inspect YouTube videos of the trail. The official TransVA GPX is misleading in this regard. Guess I made the wrong call in the end :D

Also, in case you didn't know: iD sucks for editing relations. It jumbles the order of the members and creates "gaps" in trails.
Jakka (2021-05-25 09:24:01+00:00): Tijdelijke verkeershinder van 2 naar 1 lanes OK een note erbij OK. Oneway OK maar daardoor fietsers nu ook Oneway Niet vergeten deze terug open te stellen na werken. Dit zal niet gedetecteerd worden door andere :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105259210
SomeoneElse (2021-07-28 12:21:47+00:00): Hello,
I've just moved some of the TPT at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10508149#map=18/53.66845/-1.46792 from the Superroute to the Leeds-Wombwell route to fill in a gap that had appeared at http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=10508149 .  However, I've just spotted that the Superroute has some other ways in it near Wakefield at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4139041 - presumably they shouldn't be there, but do you think it would be best to add them to a new relation, or to the Leeds-Wombwell route or something else?
I've not looked how they came to be like this, I'm just asking you because you're mapping in the area.
Cheers,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-07-28 12:32:12+00:00): (oops - looks like I already asked this at https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/103125445 )
archpdx (2021-05-30 02:28:55+00:00): Hi ScottProck,
It seems that it just took awhile for the name of the area to show up as I can see it now. Because of this, I removed the node you've added in this changeset.

-archpdx
rocky2109 (2021-05-25 05:34:59+00:00): Source: Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta is used
Gregory Peony (2025-09-02 02:06:27+00:00): Hi, you mapped a waterway/highway crossing as both a bridge and a culvert (Jalan Pemuda/Kali Mapuruka). Usually in OSM (though it can be difficult to identify) it is one or the other. If you had to choose would you say that this is a bridge or culvert?
jnighan (2021-05-25 06:02:55+00:00): Sources: Town of Ledyard, Town of North Stonington, and City of Norwich GIS viewers
tux67 (2021-05-26 08:25:01+00:00): Auf den NRW Orthophotos ist hier kein Neubau auf dem Ryther Weg angegeben. Auch hier: Was ist deine Quelle?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105264070
cobizobi (2021-05-26 12:15:52+00:00): Quelle: Lokales Wissen in Kombination mit den (aktuelleren) vorläufigen NRW Orthofotos.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-05-25 08:33:35+00:00): Hi! ☺
It seems that the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256053165 was not meant to be part of this changeset. Can you double-check that it’s OK? ☺
zsolt d (2021-07-01 20:51:16+00:00): Hi!  Yes, thank you, I corrected. It is a former military bunker building that now functions as a museum.
hatul (2025-07-22 07:23:44+00:00): שלום ggefen

האם קיים שביל בנחל?
אני רואה שאתה לפעמים מוסיף שבילים שלא קיימים בשטח. סימון של שביל במפה צריך להיות רק אם יש שביל בשטח. זה שהנחל עביר לא מצדיק שביל.
Kovoschiz (2021-05-25 11:03:37+00:00): What's wrong with it?
Kovoschiz (2021-05-25 11:06:30+00:00): If they are connected separately, you should adjust accordingly
Keima (2021-05-25 20:13:19+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Le restaurant que vous avez ajouté n'est pas à l'intérieur d'un batiment, est-ce normal? De plus la syntaxe des horaires d'ouvertures n'est pas correcte et ne pourra pas être exploité. Je vous invite à lire cette page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours pour voir comment faire.

Bonne continuation,
user_5359 (2021-05-26 06:18:01+00:00): Hello! 
You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
Keima (2021-05-25 20:13:45+00:00): Même remarque pour les horaires d'ouvertures
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-07-23 08:15:51+00:00): Hi vin_28,
We were mapping on Vietnam highway, there are several roads mapped outside the countries boundary (Tiongkok Region) please ensure the classification, due we less information about Tiongkok road classification. feel free to reach up.

Thank you.
Keima (2021-05-25 20:11:05+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Bonne continuation,
Keima (2021-05-25 20:15:04+00:00): Idem pour les horaires d'ouvertures et le placement de la pharmacie en dehors d'un bâtiment.
A67-A67 (2021-05-25 06:50:30+00:00): De busbaan eindigde een aantal jaar geleden ruim voor de rotonde en ging daarna als busstrook (dus zonder fysieke afscheiding) verder. Op die manier stond het ook in Openstreetmap ingetekend. Op recente luchtfoto's (april 2021) lijkt het niet alsof de situatie veranderd is.

Is die busstrook inderdaad een fysiek gescheiden busbaan geworden?
eggie (2021-05-25 09:42:04+00:00): In ieder geval zullen wat busrouterelaties moeten worden aangepast als de situatie is zolas die nu staat ingetekend.
mvg
eggie
A67-A67 (2021-05-25 15:11:42+00:00): Ik heb de tagging van de busbaan verbeterd, maar de buslijnen nog niet verlegd. Als er geen fysieke scheiding is, dan klopte de kaart voor deze bewerking. De busstrook staat namelijk ook al ingetekend. Ik heb een fixme toegevoegd aan deze 'busbaan'.
A67-A67 (2021-06-26 16:37:32+00:00): Omdat de gebruiker niet geantwoord heeft en de luchtfoto's en BGT laten zien dat de oorspronkelijke situatie niet is veranderd, heb ik het hersteld naar de oude situatie.

Het is een busbaan tot ongeveer 200 meter ten noorden van de rotonde. Daarna wordt het een busstrook. Een busbaan is een aparte way, een busstrook wordt met de tag lanes en de lanes-suffix toegevoegd.
eggie (2021-06-26 16:48:15+00:00): Top!
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-25 12:03:38+00:00): Hello. iD is givin a lot of incorrect suggestions. Reverted incorrect change of water tags.
jslawin (2021-05-25 19:51:52+00:00): Najmądrzejsze na całej Litwie są sugestie Tomasa Straupisa. On ma zawsze rację. F20.
Keima (2021-05-25 20:08:37+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Bonne continuation,
Keima (2021-05-25 20:10:25+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Concernant votre demande de relecture j'ai remarqué une petite erreur dans la syntaxe des horaires d'ouvertures. "Mo-Sa 09h30-12h00 and 14h30-19h00" devrait être "Mo-Sa 09h30-12h00,14h30-19h00".

Bonne continuation,
pyram (2021-08-20 09:13:55+00:00): Hallo remoh10,
könntet Ihr von Amazon euch bitte abgewöhnen vom Luftbild abzumalen - insbesondere ohne dabei auf aktuellere Einträge (hier Baustelle auf der ehemaligen Straßenbahnwendeschleife) zu achten?
Bitte die Fehler beheben!
remoh10 (2021-08-24 14:38:26+00:00): Hi pyram,
Apologies for the genuine miss from my end. I have added these segments based on the aerial imagery on OSM. I have missed checking the construction feature that was recently added. However, I have deleted the segments that I have added. Please check the changeset(110178274) with modifications. Please let me know if there are any other changes to be made. Happy to learn from you. Regards,
remoh10
trigpoint (2022-01-29 17:17:09+00:00): Maybe spend an extra few seconds improving the usefulness of the map by adding the car park which is far more useful than parking aisles.

Cheers Phil
jgopatho (2022-01-31 13:14:07+00:00): Hi Phil,
Thanks for flagging this with me. I will definitely keep this in mind while making future edits and pass it on to my supervisor for larger visibility. Happy to learn from you Phil.
Thanks and Regards, 
jgopatho.
Carnildo (2022-02-25 02:15:38+00:00): Are you sure the State Line Motor Trail is a "highway=track"?  The Thompson Pass end was very path-like when I surveyed it four years ago -- I'm sure I couldn't use anything with more than two wheels on it.
Greg_Rose (2022-02-25 06:00:19+00:00): I had a tough time with the State Line Trail - it's supposed to be open to ATV's and I'd been told that ATV ways should be tracks and not paths. But I could see in aerial imagery that it looked very much like singletrack in places, even as it also looked like a 4x4 road in others.
If a track is "open to ATVs" but probably can't accommodate them, it should downgrade to a path, right?
I guess I was waiting for someone in the field to verify what's there - so change it how you see fit!
Carnildo (2022-02-25 07:26:22+00:00): I've only verified the southernmost 500 feet or so -- I was coming back from a hike to Upper Blossom Lake, and noticed an information sign on the other side of the road (which I appear to have forgotten to map).
Thanh Anh (2021-05-25 07:31:01+00:00): đẹp