piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_3022894 (2019-11-01 18:08:27+00:00): Hi alexdav, zu dem Friseur darf ich dir da einen Tipp geben? Wenn die Filiale geschlossen wurde, kannst du das Tag shop=hairdresser durch disused:shop=hairdresser ersetzen oder den Punkt löschen. Wenn du nur den Namen änderst, bleibt das Objekt als solches als shop=hairdresser bestehen, was bedeuten würde, dass da weiterhin ein Friseur mit dem Namen "Geschlossen" ist. Viele Grüße, Lukas
naomap (2019-03-09 11:16:57+00:00): Bonjour.

Je viens de supprimer ce changeset invalide, la frontière entre la Bretagne et les Pays de la Loire n'ayant pas changé.

La carte OpenStreetMap ne saurait être un outil de propagande, elle reflète la réalité objective. 

Si vous souhaitez en débattre je vous invite à vous exprimer sur la liste de discussion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Cordialement.
Constable (2019-01-14 20:15:53+00:00): ciao Antonio, grazie per l'aggiunta! La via ha un nome? è sempre Puecher? nel caso lo fosse, aggiungi anche il nome, grazie :)
Antonio Cassia (2019-01-14 21:09:14+00:00): Chiedo scusa, ero convinto di averlo messo il nome 😅
Akkurator (2019-01-13 22:41:02+00:00): Danke!
War das wegen meine CS-Kommentars oder weil ein QS-Tool gemeckert hat?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66108394
mueschel (2019-01-15 14:14:28+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tag "transitwindsor = yes"?

Thanks
Jan
ShadowFoxNixill (2019-01-15 15:45:11+00:00): It's a network tag. The same applies to "ddot=yes", "smart=yes", or "fast=yes".

When I'm mapping these stops, I'm doing so from a moving bus, so I have to make small tags like those so I can keep up as the bus passes more stops. I then usually forget to remove them.

I'm uploading another changeset to address these tags within Downtown.
mueschel (2019-01-15 18:55:41+00:00): Thanks for replying.
That's what the "network" tag is for - we don't need a new key for each and every bus service.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform
ShadowFoxNixill (2019-01-15 21:18:39+00:00): I'm aware. I admitted that the extraneous tag (and other related tags) was the result of an oversight, explained why the tags were there in the first place, and already changed the tags in question (though I simply removed them in the case of multiple networks sharing a stop). Please call me out again if you see it again (which you may, even after this conversation), but please don't assume I don't already know this.

The reason I don't usually use the actual "network" tag is because I believe that information can be better inherited from the routes - especially in the case of stops that have multiple valid values (because multiple networks serve the stops). For example, if the stop is tagged "network=SMART/DDOT", then it won't be found if you search for exact values "SMART" or "DDOT", or if you search for "DDOT/SMART". But you can find it on SMART because it's a child of a *relation* that has "network=SMART", and you can find it on DDOT the same way.
mueschel (2019-01-15 21:42:43+00:00): Sure, relations are the best. If there are several networks, they should be separated by a ';' which isbthe standard delimiter. A search for one of several entries is not such a big deal, all databases and Overpass support searching for sub-strings.


Enjoy mapping!
Danysan95 (2019-01-14 09:20:02+00:00): Nel commento hai scritto "Aggiunto opzione "No"" ma nel changeset hai rimosso supervised=no. 
È il commento che non è chiaro o c'è un errore nel changeset?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66286348
Elia Carafoli (2019-01-14 17:46:42+00:00): Un errore nella modifica del tag, correggo.
Grazie della segnalazione
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66286348
mueschel (2019-01-14 19:31:01+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded more than 200 shapes of buildings with several foreign tags and without a "building" tag. Could you please have a look and check this?

Btw, if you link to wikimedia images, it's better to use the dedicated tag. I.e. instead of
image=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/20171216_113051_Howland_133_135.jpg

wikimedia_commons = 20171216_113051_Howland_133_135.jpg

Jan
Howpper (2019-01-13 23:01:28+00:00): (In an automobile).
literan (2019-01-14 19:58:29+00:00): и зачем вы поверх существующих тротуаров второй нарисовали, да еще с непотребными тегами и своим названием? откат.
Hjart (2019-01-14 07:56:42+00:00): Please note that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41876458 is not a "parking aisle". The previous tagging was accurate, although not common.
Lars Bo Wassini (2019-01-14 08:56:11+00:00): Ok :-)
eggie (2019-01-14 07:28:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-01-14 07:31:17+00:00): Dag pathwsd,  Een klein stukje groen is zeker geen Leisure=park, maar gewon landuse=grass. 
Probeer ook plakken van die vlakken aan wegen te voorkomen.
MVG,
Eggie
pathwsd (2019-01-14 14:32:13+00:00): dankjewel, ik zal landuse=grass gebruiken.
Hjart (2019-01-14 08:14:10+00:00): When tagging a building the same as a previously existing node (as in the case of Spar here), please remove the node: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature.2C_one_OSM_element
Lars Bo Wassini (2019-01-14 08:56:44+00:00): Noted!
eggie (2019-01-14 07:39:31+00:00): Meestal dus landuse grass binnen de bebouwde kom. natural=grass is meer voor ruig gebied.
eggie (2019-01-14 07:52:26+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk... 
Nu aangepast als landuse = grass met op node Leisure= playground. Vlak losgemaakt van pad. 
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Groet,
Eggie
pathwsd (2019-01-14 14:35:00+00:00): waardoor is het nu allemaal weg? kan ik het beste beginnen met laduse grass in het gebied? er zit daar een stuk speeltuin, hoe kan ik dat het beste daar mappen?
eggie (2019-01-14 15:02:33+00:00): Hoi.. Nee de rendering van de standaard mapnik  ligt gewoon bijna  stil. Wanneer je met de humanitarian layer kijkt zie je wat er is aangepast.
Ik heb alleen de boel losgemaakt en zo neergelegd als het in werkelijkheid ligt.
Even deze layer kijken.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66287002#map=19/51.58293/5.34692&layers=H

Ik gebruik de als achtergrond de BGT omtrekgericht van de landmeetkundige dienst.
Wanneer je wilt weten hoe dat gaat geef maar een seintje.

Succes verder,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-14 15:15:24+00:00): Die speeltuin had ik gisteren even in het midden op een node gezet. Je kunt dat ook op een vlak zetten, maar dat zie je niet op alle kaarten. Dan moet je zoiets in een multipolygoonrelatiezetten. Met een outer en een inner.
Die kennis komt vanzelf wel.
Wiki playgrounds: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-14 07:38:11+00:00): Renderen zal het strak niet meer. Dat grass was een zogenaamde multipolygoon daar hoort dat water dan als inner bij. Svp niet nog een keer grass op die outer zetten. Dat zit verborgen in de relatie. Landuse met meer ingevangen vlakken is best ingewikkeld in het begin. Het bankje staat nu in het water. 
Ik zal wat aanpassen.
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-14 07:33:08+00:00): De tag landuse=grass staat hier op de "outerrelatie". Die zie je niet. surface=grass moet er dus weer van af.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-14 08:22:14+00:00): Ik heb het water opgenomen in de multipolygoon en surface=grass verwijderd. Dat zit al in de outer (landuse=grass)
Het water was verder prima.
Je zou even in de wiki kunnen kijken hoe je die verbindingen over het water kunt maken. boardwalk?  stepping_stones?
MVG,
Eggie
pio2_122 (2019-01-17 18:28:29+00:00): Żółwia to przysiółek https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/pl:%C5%BB%C3%B3%C5%82wia?uselang=pl
Luuuddooo (2019-01-15 14:47:13+00:00): Bonjour, les données OsmAnd ne sont peu être pas tout à fait à jour mais le "Valence Atelier Libre" a déjà été cartographié ici: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5624204552
Ça serait préférable de le mettre à jour plutôt que de dupliquer.
user_5359 (2025-06-08 10:25:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/663042863/history (version 1, one of four objects). What is the mean of the tag reipppp = 3 ?
Firefishy (2025-06-08 10:31:58+00:00): REIPPP stands for the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme. 3 is 3rd phase of purchases.
Minh Nguyen (2019-01-14 03:18:34+00:00): This changeset reverts changeset 65776972 because it duplicated changeset 65776820.
LaniusCollurio (2020-06-01 12:14:06+00:00): Salve, mi riferisco a questo changeset per un discorso più generale. Le scrivo dopo che abbiamo parlato dell'argomento all'incontro mensile degli osmer locali sabato (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMers_BI-VC-CVL/Incontri_mensili#30_maggio_2020_ore_15.00). Come specificato nella wiki e discusso più volte nella mailing list nazionale i landuse non vanno attaccati ad altre way come strade, fiumi ecc...Non devono essere troppo piccoli (riguardare solo un albero o un tratto di strada), nè troppo grossi (< 700 nodi), ed è meglio evitare al massimo i multipoligon. Questo soprattutto perchè chi viene dopo e vuole inserire delle modifiche diventa matto.....Inoltre il landuse (e i natural) costituiscono l'uso del suolo che quindi cambia quando si incontra una strada asfaltata o l'acqua che hanno una dimensione che non è rappresentata dalla way che non ha dimensioni nella larghezza.
flohoff (2019-01-25 11:17:33+00:00): Moin,
diese änderung verstehe ich nicht. Sollten nicht die tags auf dem Gebäude sein? Das Gebäude ist aber das Multipolygon und nicht nur der outer way. Das ist jetzt ein buntes mischmasch aus multipolygon und auf dem outer way tags. 

Wenn man ein Multipolygon baut sollten auf dem Outer way keinerlei tags mehr sein oder?

Flo
zaizone (2019-01-25 18:50:14+00:00): Hi Flo, sorry if I do not answer in german. 
In fact I'm just trying to restore things like they were before. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26927517/history
An user "stadiaarcadia" has modified many stadiums around the world, but when he traces the buildings of the stadiums, he replaces the "leisure=stadium" tag with "building=stadium" tag, transfering all the attribute informations to the (new) building multipolygon and removing the "leisure" item.
If I'm right, the tagging scheme "building=stadium" is just a mean to precise the type of building. The important stuff is to have a "leisure=stadium" containing all the elements, the buildings & the pitch (eventualy the parkings & the accesses) as explained in the wiki. 
You seems to think that I'm doing it wrong, could you give some precisions about it ?
Cheers --> zaizone
viloan (2019-01-14 00:51:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
anonym33 (2019-01-15 07:43:33+00:00): Auch laut offizieller Aussage der Bergbahnen sowie der Tafeln vor Ort wird die Skiroute präpariert.
b-jazz (2019-01-18 22:01:12+00:00): FYI, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663050651 was added where a road way already exists. I'm going to copy your surface=asphalt tag over to the older way and delete yours. Hope that's okay.
viloan (2019-01-14 01:17:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
k127 (2019-01-15 02:52:19+00:00): Good morning Volanick,

I'm currently spending some hours to fix relations touched by this and also pro- and succeeding changesets. Almost all of them are broken.

To me you appear like a power mapper with many important achievements and thus I'd like to suggest switching to JOSM for your edits. Maybe that could save some relations from breaking? :)

Cheers
k127
maro21 (2019-01-14 21:00:45+00:00): A co z zasadą mówiącą o tym, że nie dajemy w nazwie tego co jest w tagu amenity?
maraf24 (2019-01-14 21:36:09+00:00): Nie ma takiej zasady. W name najlepiej umieścić nazwę własną, o ile jest używana/widoczna.
Te markety mają taką właśnie nazwę, dla odróżnienia od normalnych, dużych sklepów. Inne sieci robią podobnie np. Carrefour i Carrefour Market.
maraf24 (2019-01-14 21:54:35+00:00): Jest natomiast zasada, że nie umieszczamy nazwy rodzajowej w name, jeśli wynika ona z tagu. Tutaj moglibyśmy mieć z taką sytuacją do czynienia, gdyby te sklepy nazywały się "supermarket Auchan".
JandaM (2019-09-06 04:57:11+00:00): Dobry den,
  chci se zeptat proc vzniklo po vasi editaci posunuti budovy o 0.5 az 0.9m? Mam overeno ze prazska opendata sedi presne proti OSM pokud je pretrasovano z RUIAN.
  Dekuji M
r00tcz (2019-09-06 11:11:29+00:00): Ted jsem prosel vsechny zmenene budovy z tohoto changesetu a porovnal je s vrstvou RUIAN budovy v JOSM a zadna se nezda byt nejak posunuta, urcite ne o 0.5m a vic oproti RUIANu. Muzes mi dat cislo cesty (budovy) ktera se zda byt nejvice posunuta?
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-15 00:24:22+00:00): Hi Tarikul Alam,

Welcome to OSM! It appears that you added a building tag to this entire block rather than just the house. Would you like to try and fix it?
viloan (2019-01-14 02:15:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
naoliv (2019-01-14 02:32:02+00:00): São radares fixos ou móveis?
user_9353848 (2019-01-14 04:41:26+00:00): Fixos.
ElliottPlack (2022-01-21 04:50:53+00:00): Hi M86. I'm investigating a mass delete around the location of this changeset. Does this appear normal to you? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116388913#map=19/39.43499/-76.27675
m86 (2022-01-21 05:16:51+00:00): at a glance, it does not look particularly threatening - a swimming pool was removed, a house number was added, and minor nodes removed
ElliottPlack (2022-01-26 04:16:23+00:00): thanks for checking that out!
naoliv (2019-01-14 02:55:39+00:00): nitasu1993, não crie restrições de retorno na própria via; criar um "proibido retornar" na própria rua é desnecessário e gera complexidade à toa no mapa.
user_9353848 (2019-01-14 12:22:22+00:00): Modificado.
santamariense (2019-02-11 12:29:50+00:00): A melhor prática no OSM é ajustar e não apagar para refazer como você fez com a praça Maurício Cardoso. Também é importante notar que ao fazer isso, um dado foi perdido pois havia antes informação do nome antigo da praça. (Já adicionei novamente esta informação)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66289219
santamariense (2019-02-11 12:30:13+00:00): Essa era a geometria original: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461996378/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66289219
mavl (2019-07-21 13:25:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:25:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
datamongers (2019-01-15 13:00:05+00:00): That row of building=shed on Einos loop are rental cabins. And the building in front of them is the High Country Tavern.
rivermont (2019-01-15 13:18:40+00:00): Great, thanks!
Added in changeset #66331735
mavl (2019-07-21 13:25:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:25:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
santamariense (2019-02-11 11:58:40+00:00): Mesma situação aqui. Por que retrocedeu na edição? Achou que estava errado ao ter mapeado caminhos de pedestres aqui?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66290452
mavl (2019-01-18 05:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
chnav (2019-01-14 08:50:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Отношения/Отношения_не_являются_категориями
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66415459 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Robert46798 (2019-01-16 09:24:30+00:00): Hallo haggizzz,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Danke für deine Ergänzungen.

Heißt die Straße wirklich "Bruderdorf"? Also so wie der Ort? Als Straßenname sollte das dienen was auf entsprechenden Schildern steht. Sollte es weikrlich keine offiziellen Straßennamen geben kann man statt dem Namen ein "noname=yes" eintragen. Falls es bei der Adresse noch einen Ortsteil gibt (also Dargun OT Brudersdorf) kann dieser mit addr:suburb gekennzeichnet werden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:suburb). Da du Ortskenntnis zu haben scheinst, könntest du auch die übrigen, fehlenden Straßennamen in deinem(?) Ort ergänzen.

Auf dem Luftbild sieht es so aus, als würde die Hausnummer 106, so wie eingezeichnet, aus zwei Häusern bestehen. Wenn das so ist, dann sollte es auch so eingezeichnet werden.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
haggizzz (2019-01-16 13:31:09+00:00): Hallo Robert,

vielen Dank für Deine rasche Antwort.
Die Strasse heisst wirklich so. :)
Brudersdorf gehört zur Gemeinde Dargun und die Strasse wurde clevererweise ebenso wie der Ort genannt.
Ich habe die Gebäude als Einheit versucht darzustellen, da es sich um Wohnhaus und Nebengebäude handelt, also um ein und dieselbe Adresse.
Weitere Ergänzungen werde ich gern machen, so es die Zeit und die Routine erlauben.

Viele Grüsse
Robert46798 (2019-01-17 07:37:04+00:00): Alles klar.
Wegen des Gebäudes: Da gibt es keine perfekte Lösung. In diesem Fall würde ich die Gebäude so einzeichnen wie sie sind und die Adresse an das Hauptgebäude setzen.
Heinz_V (2019-01-20 12:52:22+00:00): Here you deleted a road. Please make corrections. Take care that this error doesn t happen again.
Greeshmag (2019-01-21 04:47:32+00:00): I have corrected it
mavl (2019-07-21 13:25:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2020-11-21 13:53:10+00:00): Nu edits in Nederland.. daarom Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:39:13+00:00): Reverted by: 66397981
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:38:31+00:00): Reverted by: 66397960
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:37:12+00:00): Reverted by: 66397938
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:36:31+00:00): Reverted by: 66397920
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:35:57+00:00): Reverted by: 66397906
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:35:21+00:00): Reverted by: 66397892
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:34:13+00:00): Reverted by: 66397860
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:32:57+00:00): Reverted by: 66397833
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:32:15+00:00): Revert by: 66397817
theophrastos (2019-01-15 18:47:25+00:00): Existiert auch das Gebäude nicht mehr?
viloan (2019-01-14 07:48:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Gppes_undo (2019-01-17 14:30:49+00:00): Reverted by: 66397783
freebeer (2019-01-16 18:17:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66372143 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal home viewpoint