piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iWowik (2021-09-26 19:20:05+00:00): Липовые домики нанесенные для адрески примероно.
Тут на максар виден дом большой и заметно на другом месте.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733237219/history
gileri (2019-10-11 19:29:44+00:00): Revert ici :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75583371
ACS1986 (2019-10-12 08:33:25+00:00): Hi Ryan,
Welcome to osm, we need more local mappers. You might want to look again at the tunnel. A tunnel goes underground, so the canal towpath isn't a tunnel.
Any problems just shout,
Adam
VictorIE (2019-10-12 18:04:03+00:00): Could you check these? :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228315993

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733244054
DeBigC (2019-10-13 20:07:09+00:00): I think older imagery accounts for the building mapped 6 years ago, maybe it was taken away?
DeBigC (2019-10-13 20:10:51+00:00): The second one was @mackerski moving a node a few metres off, from my original edit... so obviously wrong put it back on the correct spot
user_5359 (2019-10-10 15:28:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information, in the middle of a highway). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Carto'Cité (2019-10-16 16:28:22+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces contributions.

Pour info il n'est pas utile d'ajouter bicycle=no et foot=yes sur un highway=footway, car cela est le cas par défaut (cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#France).

Par contre si les cyclistes sont tolérés, il est intéressant d'indiquer bicycle=permissive. Est-ce le cas ici ?

Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
mueschel (2019-10-13 10:20:24+00:00): Please check these peaks - something went wrong with the 'ele' tag.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1928741276
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6866602071
abrensch (2019-10-13 14:30:05+00:00): Hallo müllers,

hier an diesem Weg hast Du keine Daten ergaenzt, sondern das highway-tag und damit den Weg gelöscht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561906177

Schaust Du`s mal an?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
PT-53 (2019-10-11 07:40:13+00:00): Hallo claudia10,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diesen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6866680376/history
ein Hinweis "duplicate_node_in_way" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.89931&lat=48.35513&zoom=18&opacity=0.34
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
claudia10 (2019-10-11 08:29:09+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, sollte jetzt glaub erledigt sein.
houtari (2020-11-16 20:09:59+00:00): Olisi varmaan kannattanut osoitteen muutoksen lisäksi siirtää myös yritys uuteen sijaintiin? Olettevasti tämä puute aiheuttaa nyt sen että Föli Reittiopas https://reittiopas.foli.fi/ paikantaa nyt Markkulantie 1-osoitteen nyt tänne vaikka ko. katu on jossain aivan muuaalla.
TravGW (2019-10-10 13:11:11+00:00): I don't know what company you're with but STOP spamming the map. Your reckless edits are destroying vital features on the map such as the major road removed in this changeset. This reckless spamming will not be tolerated.
freebeer (2019-10-10 14:17:55+00:00): good lord, achavi runs out of memory when i try to visualise this.  thanks for the revert.  this seems to be a new breed of spammer, and probably should be nuke-on-sight rather than turn repair work over to osm volunteers given how many dozens of malformed entries they pump in per day.
InsertUser (2019-10-12 21:40:02+00:00): FYI those admin boundaries are a bit approximate.
user_5359 (2019-10-10 15:43:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=garage if you has the tag building=garage (for example).
archie (2019-10-10 12:58:50+00:00): Hej, behåll gärna path istället för cycleway. Det är så kombinerade gång-/cykelstigar bör taggas. Se: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag
archie (2019-10-10 13:04:15+00:00): Den här taggningen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733263873) ger felmeddelande i t ex JOSM. foot=designated+highway=cycleway uteslutar varandra.
Jrachi (2019-10-11 07:36:08+00:00): Due note:
1) in Italia l'indirizzo corrisponde all'ingresso. Si dovrebbe mettere un nodo in corrispondenza (solitamente è dove c'è il numero, e la buca delle lettere) ed inserire 
i tag che hai inserito sul building.
2) La forma della casa, guardando le foto aeree e tenuto conto che ci abiti, è da migliorare.
3) Suggerimenti per le prossime mappature: vedo che vicino alla casa è mappato un path (sentiero percorribile solo a piedi) ma sulle foto Esri vedo che sul percorso sono parcheggiate delle auto, ovvero mi sembra più una strada agricola highway=track.

Finale: come inizio sei promosso anche se, come tutti, puoi migliorare
duckyb (2019-10-14 12:27:47+00:00): Grazie per i consigli. Cercherò di aggiustare le modifiche che avevo fatto secondo i punti che hai elencato.
Tyran (2019-10-10 22:40:25+00:00): Moin!
Durch die Änderungen wurde die Relation 9884181 unterbrochen. Lücke bitte schließen.
Danke
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Tyran
skorpion62 (2019-10-11 19:44:18+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe lediglich versucht, Deinen Fehler zu reparieren, da Du die Carumer Str. bis auf den Radweg durchgezogen hast.
Dabei ist es mir passiert, dass ich die Radroutenrelation beschädigt habe.

Ich habe jetzt auch meinen Fehler wieder repariert.

Grüße
skorpion62
PT-53 (2019-10-10 14:31:11+00:00): Hallo FlatEarther333 ,
das Gebäude war anhand Maps4BW legegenau und mit dem exakten EG-Grundriß eingezeichnet. Deine Änderung anhand des Luftbildes stellt somit eine Verschlimmbesserung dar. Ich habe diese daher wieder zurückgesetzt.
Grüße
Olga | Yanosik (2020-02-05 09:26:15+00:00): Cześć, dostaliśmy zgłoszenie o niewłaściwym przebiegu DK6 w Koszalinie, a konkretniej na ul. Morskiej. Chciałam dopytać skąd miałeś informację o zmianie DK11 na DK6? Na stronie zarządcy nadal ta ulica należy do DK11.
http://zdit-koszalin.pl/drogi-publiczne
Pozdrawiam, Olga|Yanosik
Endres Pelka (2021-07-18 12:54:36+00:00): What's the point in removing tourism=hotel from hotel grounds' outlines?
berndw (2020-07-09 08:51:42+00:00): access=residents ist ein ungewöhnlicher Wert
besser wäre destination oder private
stadt-lev-lev2 (2020-07-09 10:18:23+00:00): sorry, ist ein Fehler - ich entferne den access-tag
user_5359 (2019-10-10 15:46:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
phidauex (2019-10-19 05:56:07+00:00): Hi, some of your recent edits are very malformed, and are breaking the map. In particular, joining whole areas into a boundary relation is not how relations are meant to be used, and it is slowing down the map and causing a lot of problems.

Please remove the relations you've created, or they will have to be reverted. If you aren't sure how to do so, let me know and I can help.
UT93 (2019-10-11 17:47:20+00:00): Grüsse. Ich muss hier zwingend intervenieren! Extrem UNschön, dass du, auf was für eine Art auch immer, irgendwelche "Trails", wohl mit dem drahternen Esel abfahren tust, sie dabei auch noch, gemäss Qualitätssicherungstool OSMOSE, mit viel zu vielen Dezimalstellen erfassen und anschliessend in OSM einspielen tust. Schau dir doch mal auf der Karte an, was du damit anrichtest! Du legst neben / über / unter oder wie auch immer, parallel zu bestehenden Wegen, Strassen und Pfaden, einen neuen Pfad an! Das sieht extrem unschön aus auf der Karte und ist sicher nicht zweckdienlich. Versuche doch, wenn du schon "Trails" erfassen willst, dies wohl in der Form einer Routenrelation zu versuchen, falls dafür eine Erfassungsart existieren tut.
chnuessli (2019-10-12 08:56:26+00:00): Danke für deine Intervention. Ich habe mich soeben direkt bei dir gemeldet per Nachricht. Danke für deine Antwort.
user_5359 (2019-10-10 15:49:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please the name of your object Labyrinth instead Labrynth.
Jakka (2019-10-10 19:45:12+00:00): paard=no (niet fout) overbodig standaard gebruik vind je hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Belgium
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-10-10 13:21:43+00:00): UKR: realigned existing ways
dval (2019-10-10 18:24:56+00:00): Hi, korzunin! Улицы следует именовать иначе. Напр., не улица Сосновая, а Сосновая улица (но улица Бажова). Так предписывает росс. ОСМ-Вики. Пож., поищите (в Вики), поправьте и учтите на будущее.
viloan (2019-10-10 13:31:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-10-10 14:45:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.. Gebouwen worden in OSM niet zelf ingetekend. Periodiek wordt er geupdated. Je kunt import versnellen door een verzoek in te dienen op het forum in het draadje "Verzoek BAG import". 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog identiek aan osm account. 
Doe je dat zelf?
MVG,
Eggie
Bert Groot (2019-10-10 14:58:14+00:00): Thanks!
Voor mij inderdaad nieuw en eens kijken hoe e.e.a. werkt. 
Wilde het huis waar ik zelf ga wonen toevoegen, vandaar. Ik zal het draadje eens opzoeken!

De aanpassing in de naam van de horecagelegenheid wordt wel overgenomen?
eggie (2019-10-10 15:07:30+00:00): Je geeft gewoon aan dat je het zelf al hebt ingetekend. De BAG importeer zal er rekening mee houden en leest dit draadje ook.
Je zet dan deze hyperlink bij je verzoek .. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75515390#map=19/52.24772/6.16955&layers=N
De horeca DocH2O hoort eigenlijk op de bestaande adresnode. Wanneer Havenhuis de naam van het gebouw is mag je wel op de "outline" taggen. 

Een eerste verzoek op het forum heeft altijd vertraging wegens eerste accountcheck. Gewoon proberen. D drempel ligt laag en het forum is ook voor jou als medemapper. 
Succes,
Eggie
Supaplex (2020-01-02 17:19:40+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
GinaroZ (2019-10-10 21:36:49+00:00): I've changed Rannoch Station back to a hamlet as it is not a village.
trigpoint (2019-10-17 11:49:42+00:00): Hi, should these highway=construction have some sort of node connecting them to the existing rights of way network?

Cheers Phil
Velox (2019-10-21 13:12:08+00:00): I'm not sure if I get the question correct, but these construction roads already connected to road network. 

I.e. this line: w733290744

I have no additional information about this place to do something more than just adding this construction roads. 

Feel free to improve this location. 

Phil.
trigpoint (2019-10-24 12:13:30+00:00): There is an exiting rights of way network mapped in this area. As I can find diversion orders for these then I can only assume they still exist.

Therefore there should be connecting nodes where your new highway=construction crosses them.

Your editor should have given you warnings of crossing ways.

Cheers Phil
Velox (2019-10-28 07:29:03+00:00): Uh, are you talking about few highway=path that crossed this construction area?

I was afraid to remove them, because I don't know their urgency. 

I can't detect any signs of this paths at the satellite imagery. Do you suggest just to connect this paths to existing networks?

Just FYI, I've just noticed, that ID soes not not detect misconnections issues with highway=construction and highway=footway.
Carto'Cité (2019-10-17 06:46:01+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette contribution.

Je m'interroge sur l'utilisation de access=no : cette voie est-elle aujourd'hui en service ou pas encore ?  Si elle est en service motor_vehicle=no serait plus approprié. 

Aussi la voie est-elle séparée de la chaussée et comment ? En l'état elle ne permet pas à un calculateur d'itinéraires d'emprunter la voie puis une rue perpendiculaire à la rue des Trois Moulins, par exemple la Rue des Maraîchers, il faudrait pour cela ajouter une connexion au niveau de chaque carrefour. Je peux m'en charger mais j'aimerais votre confirmation que la liaison peut se faire à chaque carrefour et dans chaque sens (depuis et vers la voie verte).

Enfin s'agit-il d'une Voie verte identifiée par un panneau C115 ? Il est dans ce cas utile d'ajouter le tag traffic_sign=FR:C115. Pour info cela est détaille sur la page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle.

Merci d'avance pour les précisions :-)
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
2F2L (2019-10-17 10:20:53+00:00): Bonjour Antoine
La page FR:Bicycle indique : "Vous pouvez préciser la présence du panneau C115 en ajoutant le tag traffic_sign=FR:C115 aux ways de la Voie verte." ! ...
OK pour access=yes ! Il faut que je progresse ! ...
Pour le reste, je dois faire le point avec mon technicien et vérifier les connexions. La rue doit être entièrement rénovée par la Ville "prochainement" et il est possible que les accès depuis et vers la VV ne soient pas bien conformes ...
pour le moment un espace végétalisé et meuble empêche le véhicule d'arriver sur la VV ce qui nous permet d'y limiter le stationnement ...
Je fais en sorte de corriger les connexions d'ici quelques jours.
N'hésites pas à m'interroger, mais je ne suis pas toujours aussi réactif ! ...
Cordialement
Laurent Rsp patrimoine de la CA Melun val de Seine
Carto'Cité (2019-10-17 10:25:54+00:00): Merci pour cette réponse.
S'il s'agit bien d'une voie verte motor_vehicle=no + bicycle=designated + foot=designated serait plus adapté.
S'il est possible de prendre des photos et les déposer sur Mapillary ou OpenStreetCam cela peut être très utile.
Cdlt, Antoine.
2F2L (2019-10-17 10:31:34+00:00): OK
2F2L (2019-10-17 12:49:27+00:00): Antoine
Je confirme le tracé et les connexions restreintes au nord. 2 connexions au sud on été ajoutées. J'ai corrigé le tag Access et positionné sur les noeuds concerné les C115 comme indiqué sur la page FR:Bicycle
A+
Laurent
Burisma (2019-10-11 01:13:22+00:00): Would it be possible for you to split up https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/918285 (one relation for each river)?
MidwestMapGeek (2019-10-21 18:31:37+00:00): I personally would prefer if that relation were split up, but it would be quite an undertaking to split it because of how many members are in the relation and how large of a geographic area it covers. That is why I have left it as is for now. If I have the time at some point, I do think it would be good for it to be split.
Truchin (2019-10-10 15:57:04+00:00): Une bretelle de périph en secondary link, c'est surprenant et pas conformer au wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
En as tu discuté avec la communauté ?

Bonne continuation

Thomas
Vinber-Pro (2019-12-01 18:43:15+00:00): Bonjour,
vu que cela a été discuté sur talk-fr et qu'il n'y a pas de réponse publique, est-ce qu'il y a eu des modifications et/ou des réponses en privé ?
à plus
Vinber
Truchin (2019-12-02 09:01:58+00:00): Pas à ma connaissance :(
mavl (2019-12-21 16:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78713278, 78715571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
viloan (2019-10-10 14:20:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2019-10-11 18:14:07+00:00): 這裡不是溫泉吧
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6867184185
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75518223
literan (2019-10-10 16:59:37+00:00): почти все - плохая попытка, потаскал точки на сотни метров в стороны. Это называется вандализм, откатываю.
qnitomq (2019-10-14 06:18:38+00:00): Добрый день, если вы про алкогольные магазины - то моих рук дело... Остальные объекты изменились совершенно стихийно (не знаю как, я не специально), и я к ним особого отношения не имею. Однако спасибо вам за правки !
abakus_uploader (2019-10-10 22:30:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Elyana IRM-ED (2022-11-28 03:23:06+00:00): Deleted data due to overlapping with other building
OmranNAJJAR (2025-04-28 08:26:38+00:00): I believe this revert has caused lots of overlapping buildings !
eggie (2019-10-10 15:37:13+00:00): Wanneer het fietspad gereed is kan de specificatie construction=cycleway ook verwijderd worden. surface=gravel is op fietspaden meestal  fine_gravel  Dat routeert als verhard. Echt gravel op een fietspad is niet te fietsen. Zou het fine_gravel kunnen zijn? 
Gr Eggie
user_5359 (2019-10-10 16:07:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
user_5359 (2019-10-10 16:17:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as area=yes Please use building=yes.
Is LaundroMAX a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
freebeer (2019-10-12 17:42:47+00:00): second try.

based on the name, i'd have guessed amenity=laundry but that shows how little i know as it should be shop=laundry.

i'll turn in my osm mapper badge for this faux pas.  and yes, i did google the shop name to confirm my guess.
user_5359 (2019-10-11 03:15:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/201381425/history) over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.
user_5359 (2019-10-10 16:23:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5895653295/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I partly reversed your change set. Please check the situation.
ma-rt-in (2019-10-10 16:47:58+00:00): Hallo,
Warum ist die Moseltalhalle eine Eventraum? Die Halle ist nicht nur Eventhalle, sondern auch Sporthalle und Bürgerhaus.
Des Weiteren ist der Weinbrunnen kein Park und Bänke sollte nicht mit Wegen verbunden werden. Zudem braucht ein Park eine Adresse bzw. hat ja auch keine.

vg aus der Nachbarschaft
Hb- (2022-05-11 08:30:27+00:00): With this changeset the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499959439 was set as bridge. Are you sure of this? On satelite images no bridge is visible. Could the crossing be a ford?
Kot Leopold (2022-05-11 09:18:04+00:00): It's definitely a bridge. This is a small footbridge.
Hb- (2022-05-11 15:13:02+00:00): Thanks. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120846131
WingardiumMapiosa (2021-07-20 18:59:14+00:00): Hello Karakalpakstan, hope you’re doing well. I noticed the parenthesis in the name of this lake and wondered what the meaning of this naming convention is. From the history it looks like there is an old name and new name and some combination of both were put into the name attribution. Could you help me understand this better? Is it possible to separate the parenthesis into a different tag? 

[Google Translate]: Салом Каракалпокистон, умедворам ки хуб кор мекунед. Ман қавсро дар номи ин кӯл мушоҳида кардам ва ҳайрон шудам, ки маънои ин нишасти номгузорӣ чист. Аз таърих чунин менамояд, ки номи кӯҳна ва номи нав мавҷуданд ва баъзе таркиби ҳарду ба атрибутсия гузошта шудаанд. Оё шумо ба ман кӯмак карда метавонед, ки инро беҳтар фаҳмам? Оё мумкин аст, ки қавсро ба теги дигар ҷудо кунем?
aweech (2019-10-11 01:53:49+00:00): Hi, it looks like you deleted roads that exist very clearly in aerial imagery in this changeset. Please don't do that! The local convention is to tag abandoned roads with `highway=track`.
sushredd (2019-10-11 10:13:15+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your response. Apologies for the deletion. As most of the road was covered with vegetation and the street can on the other end (at node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6868679105) appeared like there wasn't any road present due to which I have deleted it. I see that you've corrected the edit and have been through that road. I shall follow the road tag as suggested for my future edits. 

Regards,
sushredd
iWowik (2019-10-15 20:14:32+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, а также вносите адресную информацию.
Причем иногда название улицы вопреки принятому соглашению. То есть ул. вместо улица

Обычно номера домов сложно найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?