piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-11-08 10:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64287153 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
viloan (2018-10-02 18:11:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mrloop (2018-10-02 18:15:24+00:00): Cycled around the wind frame today and used satellite imagery to confirm
GerdP (2018-10-05 10:19:31+00:00): Hi! You changed a highway=residential to the very unusual highway=commercial.
I assume this happened accidentially?
GerdP (2018-10-05 10:19:55+00:00): Forgot the link:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172129916
beigetable (2018-10-08 20:03:50+00:00): Hi. Thanks for pointing it out. I've changed it to highway=service.
It was deliberate, it is a commercial rather than residential area, though I didn't check whether highway=commercial was a usual tag.
kreuzschnabel (2020-04-25 17:47:34+00:00): Was ist denn https://osm.org/node/5949410284 – Peter Fox’ „Haus am See“?
mavl (2018-11-08 03:15:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64272210 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
mavl (2018-11-08 10:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64285031 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
乌克兰移民 (2018-10-02 18:31:45+00:00): It was duplication of the line in the same position
and the rest of the violations
Digne (2018-10-03 17:34:35+00:00): Hoi Twotert,

Ik zag dat er om feedback was gevraagd. Het ziet er op zich goed uit.

Wat mij wel opviel is dat je de weg verwijderd en opnieuw tekent. Om de geschiedenis van een object te bewaren is het handig om in dit soort gevallen gewoon de huidige weg iets aan te passen.
M!dgard (2018-12-28 17:32:38+00:00): Telefoonnummer was verkeerd overgenomen uit de note, ik heb het gecorrigeerd.
RicoElectrico (2018-10-03 09:12:53+00:00): Cześć, dodajesz jeszcze raz szkołę, którą dodałeś parę dni temu:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63090082

Ja potem ją przeniosłem na wyrysowany obszar, a Ty dodajesz jeszcze raz. Więc teraz jesz zarówno na punkcie, jak i obszarze ;)

Takie są wady używania MAPS.ME, które ma mapy aktualizuje tylko co miesiąc.

O wiele lepszy edytor (iD) masz online na osm.org - można nie tylko dodawać punkty, ale i rysować linie (np. drogi) i obszary (np. budynki). 

W każdym razie- dzięki za dokładanie cegiełki swojej lokalnej wiedzy do mapy; jeśli masz jakieś pytania śmiało pisz, to pomogę.
luschi (2018-10-02 18:55:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/692235
Carto'Cité (2018-10-12 09:50:49+00:00): Bonjour RB94,

Vous continuez la "guerre d'édition" sans aucun dialogue ! Je veux bien qu'il y ait un discussion autour de l'usage de residential ou service et justement on pourrait en parler. Par contre pour moto_vehicle=bus je vous ai déjà invité à m'expliquer son utilisation. Moi j'en suis là :
- peu utilisé :
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/motor_vehicle=bus#overview
- surtout par vous : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/CHm
- rien sur le wiki

On fait quoi ?

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Leo Slager (2018-10-03 09:40:45+00:00): Weet je ook wat voor type barrier daar staat?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
Twotert (2018-10-03 09:53:53+00:00): Ik heb gekeken in lijst van soorten barrières en die staat niet tussen. Als U opzoekt in zoekmachine: “barrière  bos” dan vindt u deze barrière, ik heb alleen geen idee hoe dit het Nederlands heet, laat staan in het engels.
Leo Slager (2018-10-03 12:59:21+00:00): Als er geen fysieke barrier is dan zou ik die ook niet intekenen. Dat de weg verder gaat als een veldweg/bospad impliceert namelijk dat er geen voertuigen kunnen rijden.
Twotert (2018-10-03 14:16:54+00:00): Het is een fysieke barier, het is een slagboom die niet omhoog gaat maar op zij. Dit soort barier staan vaak bij ingangen naar het bos.
eggie (2018-10-03 14:45:04+00:00): barrier=swing_gate
Twotert (2018-10-03 16:33:27+00:00): Bedankt! Ik heb het al gewijzigd.
eggie (2018-10-03 16:40:53+00:00): Top!
Digne (2018-10-03 19:33:41+00:00): Hi DDdW,

I noticed feedback was requested. Please note that the tower was already tagged on the building along with many of the tags you added to the node. Could you update the existing tower, instead of adding a second one?
jaap de vries (2018-10-02 19:40:26+00:00): Je hebt van een wachtruimte op het perron een fietsenstalling gemaakt, ik heb die weer veranderd.
freebeer (2019-01-08 14:18:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66129884 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me castle in the middle of the road
Nakaner-repair (2018-10-02 19:50:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 62758875, 62878174, 62911099, 62939991, 62970707, 62970820, 62970953, 62971011, 62975787.
viloan (2018-10-02 19:53:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
frosm (2018-10-02 20:04:53+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
pour faire un test, n'hésitez pas à utiliser le tutoriel, il vous permet de faire des tests sans sauvegarder cela dans la base mondiale :)
bonne continuation
viloan (2018-10-02 19:59:12+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Truchin (2018-10-03 13:08:26+00:00): Non, les abris bus ne se taguent pas en amenity=shelter mais avec shelter=yes.
Ce ne sont pas non plus des bâtiments sauf exception.
Merci de corriger.
Truchin (2018-10-03 13:20:17+00:00): Idem pour l'aménagement cyclable de l'avenue Raspail. Il était déjà présent dans la base. C'est une bande et non pas une piste sur une grande partie du linéaire et les connections avec les voies adjacents ne sont pas prise en compte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630020686
Rom1 (2018-10-03 15:09:41+00:00): Si amenity=shelter est correct pour un abri-bus cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shelter_type
zorglubu (2018-11-10 22:07:24+00:00): Les shelters Poterne des peupliers ont été ajouté en doublon sur la route 184. Merci de veiller à conserver la continuité de la route et l'ordre des arrêts. Erreur signalée par Osm inspector, et corrigée.
OpenTopoMap (2018-11-24 14:41:59+00:00): What have you done here? You've tagged a forest as power line: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239523257/history

Please fix this immediately!
Dartmouthmapmaker (2018-11-24 16:05:08+00:00): Fixed
OpenTopoMap (2018-11-24 21:01:56+00:00): Thanks. Do you know, that you might be one of the most hurried mappers? Keep cool, the map will keep us working for the next 50 years ;)
Dartmouthmapmaker (2018-11-24 21:36:13+00:00): :)
AlexFringilla (2018-10-27 18:59:53+00:00): Необязательно ставить тег name=Подстанция, это и так видно из остальных тегов. power=substation надо ставить на все здание, а не отдельной точкой, исправил.
PT-53 (2019-07-27 05:14:47+00:00): Hallo 0815jh007,
Du hast diese P-Zufahrt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630023370/history neu eingezeichnet.
Sie kreuzt diesen Fußweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155457894#map=18/47.77857/9.57410 hat aber mit ihm keinen gemeinsamen Knoten. Außerdem ist die Zufahrt nur an diesen Radweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34993852#map=18/47.77809/9.57178 angeschlossen, nicht aber an die Straße.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
TourenbikerFKB (2019-07-27 06:31:29+00:00): als Ergänzung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service=parking_aisle#Abgrenzung_von_anderen_Service-Ways

d.h. parking_aisle gehört weg, da es sich um die Zufahrt zum Parkplatz handelt.
PT-53 (2019-08-07 06:22:12+00:00): Hallo 0815jh007,
schaust Du Dir das bitte nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-19 16:23:53+00:00): Hallo 0815jh007,
schaust Du Dir das bitte nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
dudka (2018-10-11 11:16:04+00:00): для чого ви все це переробили? pedestrian - це пішохідні вулиці. пішохідні доріжки в парку - footway. До того ж багато проїздів для машин ви замінили на пішохідні.
dudka (2018-10-11 11:16:17+00:00): Відміню всю ваші зміни на виставці
avinet_ua (2018-10-11 15:35:09+00:00): побувайте там і роздивіться уважно, все вірно нанесенр, це все - пішохідні широчезні вулиці по яким гуляють пішоходи, а не маленькі "доріжки в парку" чи "стежки". "пішохідні доріжки" тут явно не підходять. тим паче для такого місця ВДНГ

не треба нічого відміняти, там безліч інших змін
LukasE (2018-10-02 20:22:52+00:00): train station . Sorry for autocorrect
eggie (2018-10-02 20:39:49+00:00): Place of worship? Maybe art_work?
Mikedemon (2018-10-02 20:52:25+00:00): That's right, it is a statue but I didn't find a suitable category, my App is in spanish so I thought the category was something like "must see location"; can I change it? Thanks in advance
eggie (2018-10-02 21:15:31+00:00): I'll change it :)
eggie (2018-10-02 21:26:34+00:00): I moved the artwork to the right place with extra tag statue
eggie (2018-10-02 21:32:49+00:00): artwork_type=statue added
Nakaner-repair (2018-10-03 07:31:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63148977 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by WoWaWoWa due to deletion of features without giving a proper reason. OSM is a public database, not your personal canvas to remove ticket validators from.
Nakaner-repair (2018-10-03 07:32:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63148977 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by WoWaWoWa due to deletion of features without giving a proper reason. OSM is a public database, not your personal canvas to remove ticket validators from.
pangoSE (2018-10-04 21:11:17+00:00): Bra jobbat! Välkommen till OSM.
Visst är det kul?
Du som gillar lägga in vägar. Känner du till att du kan aktivera ett bakgrundslager från trafikverkets vägdatabas?
Mvh
Egil
PS: Gå gärna med i en Telegram-chat, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts
Finns även en specifikt för SE.
ForstEK (2018-10-02 20:46:12+00:00): source: http://amurohota.ru/attachments/article/816/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%20%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%90%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D1%82%201%20%D0%B8%D1%8E%D0%BB%D1%8F%202016%20%E2%84%96291.doc
Lokai (2018-10-03 09:08:49+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM.

Die Strablinen werden in Relationen beschrieben. Der name-tag ist somit falsch. Ich führe einen revert durch.

Bei Fragen, bitte an der Diskussion teilnehmen,

Schöner Gruß
Glassman (2018-10-02 21:55:18+00:00): Is the gate still there? What bike routing app do you use?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63138710
LockSaw (2018-10-03 15:49:53+00:00): Hi Glassman, the swing gate is still there ... I messed up the edit and fixed it on OpenStreetMaps. I asked for a review this time to make sure I put all the tags in there right. I'm really sorry :(
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63138710
Carto'Cité (2018-10-12 12:35:08+00:00): Bonjour Albin,

Merci pour l'ajout du DSC et du commentaire clair. Pour les DSC, la tendance est plus à utiliser cycleway=opposite qui décrit bien un DSC malgré le choix discutable du tag. Il est cumulable avec oneway:bicycle=no selon moi. Je l'ajoute :)

N'hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des questions ou des remarques.

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
user_507893 (2018-10-04 12:59:22+00:00): [Hier](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235001060#map=20/53.59256/9.93341&layers=H) und [hier](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235001061#map=19/53.59263/9.93486&layers=H) fehlen Schlüssel und Wert. [Siehe auch](http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.93458&lat=53.59252&zoom=18&baselayer=GeofabrikStandard&overlays=ways_without_tags)
ma-rt-in (2018-11-29 12:25:44+00:00): Hallo,
wurde behoben.
vg
eggie (2018-10-02 21:28:30+00:00): art_worktype=sculpture ?
carciofo (2019-05-15 19:34:35+00:00): Hi, what was the reason for changing the trunk highway from the peripheral road to the road going through the city? Trunk roads are designed precisely to circumvent big cities...
galileo_01 (2019-05-17 22:06:53+00:00): Hello again, carciofo.  I adjusted the route for the trunk highway to more directly connect to the city of Pasto.  This is based on my understanding of trunks found on the “Guide for Mapping in Colombia” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guide_for_mapping_in_Colombia) which says trunk can connect to major state capitals.  The description did not mention anything about trunks circumnavigating major cities.
carciofo (2019-05-19 09:23:05+00:00): Well, that's why the proviso that they are defined by the Nat'l Transport Minsitry is there. Had you looked that the way trunk roads are defined, you would have seen that they indeed circumvent cities whenever possible. Also, as you're probably aware documentation is scarce and not necessarily up-to-date, as there are few who take on the task. As one of the people who actually write on the wiki, not everything is documented and the actual map should be representative of mapping practices --I think you'll find many examples of trunk circumventing cities (Ipiales, just to the south and Popayan just to the north on Nat'l Hwy 25, just as a couple examples).
galileo_01 (2019-05-22 00:07:34+00:00): Carciofo, thank you for clarifying trunk highway modeling.  Could you provide a link to the government resource you are referencing?  Also, would you prefer to update the highway classifications around Pasto or would you like me to update them?
carciofo (2019-05-22 08:37:04+00:00): Kindly revert your edit, as the information was correct before. You're welcome to look at the Spanish Wikipedia article for the national road system in Colombia. I would have thought that an Apple project would have at the very least started their research there. Unfortunately the community is not large enough to monitor and revert changes from large teams such as yours, so we appreciate you reverting the edit. Thank you in advance.
galileo_01 (2019-05-23 16:10:56+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. Can you link to the page you are referring to?
galileo_01 (2019-05-24 23:55:38+00:00): Also, I noticed Tunel de Daza along the bypass has motor_vehicle=no.  Aerial imagery shows cars using the road leading to the tunnel, I’m going to remove that tag if it’s okay.
nyampire (2018-10-02 22:27:05+00:00): 復旧作業、ありがとうございます。
コメントとメッセージ、確認いただけましたでしょうか。

本日、hiromutv001206さんによる、#62964237以前の編集について一度巻き戻しを行おうと考えています。復旧作業の結果、OSM上で二重に登録される地物が発生するかとも思いますが、そこは私の方でチェックして、hiromutv001206さんが新しく書いたほうを残す予定です。

ご意見いただけると嬉しいです。
nyampire (2018-10-03 01:31:30+00:00): 別のかたが一昨日、必要な部分の巻き戻しをされたとのこと、連絡をうけました。
なので、僕の方での作業は実施しない方向です。

もしなにかあればご連絡ください。
aharvey (2022-01-25 04:21:56+00:00): Some of your tracks from this changset were deleted recently in https://osmcha.org/changesets/116519029/ at the time of your survey were these tracks on the ground, just working out if we need to restore them.
mrpulley (2022-01-26 09:24:14+00:00): Regarding the two deleted ways - I had been thinking about deleting them when I was there three years ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63140199) but left them alone. I didn't see those tracks at the time, but left them in case I had missed them.
maraf24 (2018-10-03 09:31:10+00:00): Co to za fikcyjne nazwy budynków, z doklejoną ikonką aparatu?
maraf24 (2018-10-03 09:33:55+00:00): To jest wszystko do wyrzucenia.
łapa ciemności (2019-01-19 09:54:22+00:00): Jaki sens mają low_line i low_pole w Krzywej?
abakus_uploader (2018-10-03 22:30:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
naoliv (2018-10-08 19:02:05+00:00): Hola, MarianoSB10.
Hay una diferencia entre parque https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpark y jardín https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

Tal vez quiera leer las definiciones antes de continuar cambiando los objetos?

En caso de que usted tenga interés, puede ponerse en contacto con la comunidad mexicana a través de la lista de e-mails https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-mx, del foro https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=79 o del canal en Telegram https://t.me/joinchat/B1BSH0HichMRyYpDdu_mbg para aclarar dudas de cómo mapear correctamente las cosas.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-05 12:31:03+00:00): Hello,
(while looking for something else, as ever) I just spotted that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2060872272 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8147999733/history might perhaps be supposed to be the same thing, but they're not in the same place?
Best Regards,
Andy
Paul The Archivist (2021-10-12 18:47:23+00:00): Apologies for the delay in replying. Looking online (e.g. https://memoirsofametrogirl.com/2018/08/05/william-blake-gravestone-bunhill-fields-unveiled-2018-history/), it seems there are indeed two separate memorials to William Blake which probably explains this. There is one apparently dating to the 1920s which is node 2060872272. I'm guessing that node 8147999733 might be the location of the new stone dating to 2018. The new one wasn't there at the time I was mapping there so can't confirm whether it is or not.

Cheers,
Paul
SomeoneElse (2021-10-12 19:02:05+00:00): Thanks Paul!
eggie (2018-10-03 07:02:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Probeer als het even kan niet zelf adressen aan te maken maar bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes (import Kadaster)
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-03 07:06:04+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
pangoSE (2018-10-04 21:00:43+00:00): Välkommen till OSM.
Visst är det kul?
Har du justerat bing efter gps-spår eller lm vägdata innan du flyttade på dessa vägar?
Satellitbilderna ligger tyvärr inte alltid helt rätt.
Mvh
Egil
PS: Gå gärna med i en Telegram-chat, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts
Finns även en specifikt för SE.
eggie (2018-10-03 07:25:57+00:00): Dag Lars.. Probeer indien mogelijk op de BAG adresnodes bij te taggen. Soms is dat even (uit)zoeken. 
MVG,
Eggie
Túllio (2020-10-14 07:27:53+00:00): A MG-205 nunca foi pavimentada.
cadsauxk (2020-10-14 19:22:31+00:00): Oi Túlio, 
não entendi seu comentário. Acabei de verificar aqui e ela continua com surface=ground no mapa. Ou seja, continua sem pavimentação, então está tudo certo.
abraço
Túllio (2020-10-14 22:59:37+00:00): Olá Gerald. Sem problemas. Ontem eu fui verificar a estrada e no "Histórico da linha: MG-205 (342868751)" mostrava que há dois anos no seu "conjunto de alterações #63141878" você tinha colocado a MG-205 como surface=paved e assim estava até ontem quando alterei para surface=unpaved. Obrigado!
Hjart (2018-10-03 16:45:48+00:00): When "improving accuracy" in Denmark, please use our national SDFE aerial imagery which is much more recent, better quality and better aligned than Bing.
cedeel (2018-10-03 16:53:03+00:00): Thanks. Having lived in the area for many years, it was not only guided by Bing, although that was used with proper offset.
sejohnson (2018-11-06 19:41:05+00:00): Trace the ENTIRE tennis court as one feature.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63141997
sejohnson (2018-11-06 19:40:08+00:00): Don't use the name tag to describe features. The name of this pool is not, "Swimming Pool".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63142053
yaugenka (2018-10-06 11:18:38+00:00): hi. can you please retern the waterbody roles back? the main_stream role should be used only for the central line, not the river bed one. Thanks.
user_8101879 (2018-10-12 16:09:00+00:00): Sorry for answer so lately, I was traveling in Bolivia.
You need to follow some rules : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway

waterbody is not approved, you should not use it
But you're right : only the central line is needed in the relation, the riverbank should not be in it. Sorry to have transform your waterbody, I should have rather deteted them.
Best regards