piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ergerzher (2016-01-24 13:11:11+00:00): Hi ! Thanks for the hint. I rectified the error.
GerdP (2016-01-24 13:35:33+00:00): I see. Another point:
access:bicycle=* should be bicycle=*, 
access:psv should be psv=*
I think these tags were used long before the namespaces like maxspeed:forward=50  were invented.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Examples
Ergerzher (2016-01-26 21:50:00+00:00): Problem solved. Thanks
GerdP (2016-01-25 07:22:16+00:00): Hi there!
You used the deprecated tag highway=byway here. Was that intended ?
Herr Kramer (2019-08-22 20:50:02+00:00): Hallo Tigerlilli, warum hat die Lichtzeichenanlage "Bernburg Ost" einen Eigennamen? - Mir ist nichts bekannt das Ampeln eigene Namen haben oder haben sollten.

LG
catoblepa (2016-01-23 21:32:56+00:00): Ciao Sam, benvenuto su Osm.
Ogni volta che salvi un changeset é buona regola inserire un commento per rendere più agevole la revisione delle tue modifiche da parte degli altri utenti.
Buon lavoro!
Robert Whittaker (2016-02-04 11:50:51+00:00): From its website Worcester Snoezelen http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392376528 doesn't look like it's really a school. It seems to be more like a specialised activity centre. I wonder if amenity=school is the most appropriate tag for it.
lsces (2016-02-04 14:01:38+00:00): They run training courses for special needs pupils and teachers, but college is just as wrong. I really left it as a school to open the debate on what should be used but 'activity_centre' is probably better?
silverbeat (2016-01-24 18:16:11+00:00): Danke – wirkt unter der Straße, soweit ich das jetzt sehen kann, zumindest präziser als es vorher war.
opendcc (2016-01-24 06:00:11+00:00): Hallo,

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert sagt: Apply to the section of covered waterway. Use the tag layer=* as usual for tunnels. 

Von daher hätte ich gedacht, dass zu einem culvert auch der Layer -1 richtig wäre.

Servus Wolfgang
degernfelder (2016-01-24 19:24:52+00:00): Sorry, da bin ich wohl falsch informiert. Das hab ich völlig überlesen. Das mach ich rückgängig.
user_5359 (2016-01-24 04:24:10+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bist DU sicher dass der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30235354 tatsächlich den Namen daily besitzt oder nicht vielmehr eine persönliche Beschreibung der Wegnutzung ist?
user_5359 (2016-01-24 04:30:31+00:00): Der Changeset 36767234 wurde zurückgenommen. Deine eingezeichnete Straße überlappt verschiedene Straßen. Wenn Du die Kenntnis hast, dass die Gallenstraße ebenfalls Kärnten Straße benannt ist, benenne bitte diese Straße um. Falls es -aus welchen Gründen auch immer- nicht möglich ist, kannst Du noch immer eine Notiz (vorletztes Icon rechter Kartenrand) mit einem entsprechenden Hinweis absetzen).
user_5359 (2016-01-24 05:01:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why do you delete this four points? Didn't they really exists anymore? Or they are not needed on a map?
Robert Whittaker (2016-01-24 09:48:13+00:00): According to http://www.education.gov.uk/edubase/establishment/summary.xhtml?urn=130715 the establishment "Pershore Group of Colleges" closed in 2007, so 130715 is not a valid Edubase URN to use for a currently open college.

If the site at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171571197 is now part of the Warwickshire College Group (http://www.education.gov.uk/edubase/establishment/summary.xhtml?urn=130835) then ref:edubase=130835 should be used instead.
lsces (2016-01-24 12:27:05+00:00): You are probably right. The edubase seems to be creating it's own rules for identifying establishments. *I* would expect each one to have it's own campus ID so an inspecter knows just which site they are inspecting, but there are NO details of the many secondary campuses on the list :( South Worcestershire has to sites and Heart of Worcestershire has 12 across four towns but edubase only lists one. 
If I switch to the 'Warwickshire College Group' but keep the CURRENT name we get other errors thrown by the current checks which is what we need to establish guide lines for?
Endres Pelka (2016-01-24 18:23:49+00:00): Why are you renaming "Barrettstown" to "Coleman (Hennessy)", while there's already another "Coleman (Hennessy)" next to it? Please respond ASAP.
GeneHunt (2016-01-25 00:04:06+00:00): Hi, I have that fixed now (I think), I had to stop in the middle of editing last night my browser crashed a few times and I had throw in the towel.
GerdP (2016-01-25 07:46:03+00:00): Moin!
Was bedeutet ein highway=turning_circle an einem building=yes ?
Ich sehe das immer mal wieder und hab' keine Idee...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393066772
aufachse (2016-01-25 21:36:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Tag in changeset #36805824 entfernt.
GerdP (2016-01-26 07:33:05+00:00): Danke. Mich würde trotzdem interessieren, wie es dazu kam, egal ob Versehen oder Missverständnis.
aufachse (2016-01-26 21:58:38+00:00): Und welchen Hintergrund hat Dein Interesse?
GerdP (2016-01-27 08:00:09+00:00): Ich lasse täglich ein paar Skripte laufen, die mich auf wahrscheinlich falsch getaggte Wege aufmerksam machen, wenn ich dabei systematische Probleme erkenne, versuche ich, die Ursache zu ermitteln, um z.B. den Entwicklern von JOSM einen entsprechenden Hinweis zu geben.
aufachse (2016-01-27 22:15:23+00:00): Das macht Sinn. Leider kann ich nicht mehr nachvollziehen wie es zu dem falschen Tag kam. Deswegen kann ich nur Vermutungen anstellen. Es handelt sich um ein etwas umfangreicheres changeset. Bei diesem sind neben anderen keys 'building' und 'highway' enthalten. Wahrscheinlich habe ich bei der vergabe des tags 'highway=turning_circle' den betreffenden node und ein Objekt mit dem tag 'building=yes' markiert. Es handelt sich somit höchstwahrscheinlich um ein Versehen. Oder entwickelt JOSM ein Bewußtsein? Und will zum Ausdruck bringen, daß es in dem betreffenden Haus rund geht ...
GerdP (2016-01-28 07:09:16+00:00): :-)
Zumindest scheint sich JOSM nicht daran zu stören, wenn highway=* mit building=* kombiniert wird. Ist aber wahrscheinlich schwer, da alle unsinnigen Fälle aufzulisten.
Muss mal schauen, wie das ginge.
maraf24 (2016-01-24 12:16:12+00:00): Nazwa potoczna już była tam, gdzie powinna być-w loc_name.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/365731
maraf24 (2016-01-24 12:22:38+00:00): Widocznie UM zgubił adres:
http://skroc.pl/56df7
RicoElectrico (2016-01-24 15:33:14+00:00): Proszę o poprawę - przeciągnąłeś chodnik przez blok i jezdnię: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2940279512
MortalKR (2016-01-26 22:24:15+00:00): Przepraszam, dopiero się uczę, nie chciałem nic zmieniać w związku z chodnikiem. Jeśli chodzi o mnie to nie wiem jak to się stało ani jak zmienić. Zamierzałem tylko nadać właściwy nr budynku. I tak - na stronie podanej w linku jest błąd, gminni urzędnicy zrobili ten adres jak widać. Mieszkam w okolicy (Wawelska) i gwarantuję, że jedna klatka to 37 a druga 39, choć fizycznie jest to jedna kamienica.
maraf24 (2016-01-26 22:34:22+00:00): Chodnik jest już poprawiony, a urzędnicy czasem nie wywiązują się dobrze ze swoich obowiązków.
Miłego mapowania.
Baloo Uriza (2016-01-24 04:05:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  I see this is a large changeset with a short description, curious if you could tell me more about what changed.
Fishztikz (2016-01-24 23:44:06+00:00): Some road we're a bit off, I fixed some of those in the area. I also removed some Residential Roads that we're actually just driveways to houses. I may add those back as a different type of road a bit later on. Other than that, I just fixed a few errors around the area. I really didn't expect any replies, glad I'm not the only one that uses this.
Baloo Uriza (2016-01-25 00:16:14+00:00): A better strategy on driveways would be to change them to highway=service, service=driveway, access=private, especially in these boonies where driveways may lead to a residence a very long distance from a road.  This map is often the first resource for humanitarian resources.
Fishztikz (2016-01-25 00:24:57+00:00): Ok, thanks for the tip. I'll work on the area that I removed them from. Didn't realise I could change a road from the side bar.
Baloo Uriza (2016-01-25 00:37:10+00:00): If you're interested in looking into long-term and more than trivial editing, you might want to look into JOSM as an editor.  id is excellent for small work, though JOSM is better for handling large scale or more precise work.
Fishztikz (2016-01-25 00:43:36+00:00): Ok, I'll look into it. Thanks a lot.
GerdP (2016-01-25 04:13:30+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
You have used highway=crossing for some footways. Please note that those ways should be tagged 
highway=footway + footway=crossing
The tag highway=crossing should be used for the node that is shared by the footway and the major road.
wićka (2016-01-25 12:57:56+00:00): hank you for your explanation.

The problem is, that is not only for pedestrians but also for cyclists, and looks like "red carpet" made of thermoplastic paint.

Maybe better will be highway=path + path=crossing ?
wićka (2016-01-25 12:58:14+00:00): *Thank
GerdP (2016-01-25 13:33:53+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. The wiki also documents highway=cycleway + cycleway=crossing. See the first sentences in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
wićka (2016-01-25 21:51:59+00:00): OK, done.
lokejul (2016-01-25 06:32:07+00:00): I saw that you recently marked several local highways as trunk for better rendering. E.g. BC 7, 13, 97

I worry because of wording in the guidelines that identify CORE highways as trunk:
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canadian_tagging_guidelines#Trunk

Is it possible to verify trunk status with the latest list on page 29 of:
 http://www.comt.ca/english/nhs-report-2014.pdf
dalmond (2016-01-24 04:12:45+00:00): Clouds cover parts of the Bing images which is why the road is broken up.
lcmortensen (2016-01-28 02:11:59+00:00): reverted by changeset 36849232 - the Waikato Expressway is not a designated motorway.
wille (2016-01-25 01:15:41+00:00): Parabéns pelo desenho super detalhado!
woodpeck (2016-02-13 21:41:52+00:00): Der deutsche Name von Kaliningrad ist "Kaliningrad" und nicht "Königsberg", ich habe das bereits in einer längeren Diskussion mit dem User "Fritz18" erklärt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36328757

Bitte ausserdem "source=Atlas" präzisieren, bzw. falls der betr. Atlas urheberrechtlichen Schutz geniesst, keine Informationen aus ihm übernehmen.
awesm (2016-03-13 05:20:09+00:00): Please provide a source with the source tag for your edits. It's very important to know where you got your information: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
d1g (2016-01-24 18:30:27+00:00): Привет! was:natural=grassland не совсем правильное тегирование травы. Предлагаю использовать недавно обсуждаемую схему чтобы не было пустых споров у любителей "зелёных многоугольников".

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=498776#p498776
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=499097#p499097
Endres Pelka (2016-01-24 18:04:30+00:00): Hello, you broke the boundary relations of Corrong (5740913) and One Tree (5740798). If you're currently improving boundaries in this area, please be so kind and fix it.
waldhans (2016-01-24 18:28:36+00:00): ist das wirklich nur für Fußgänger oder darf ich dort auch mit dem Rad durch? 
Kurt
conti72 (2016-01-24 18:45:51+00:00): Doch ist auch für Fahrräder. Habe ich gerade geändert.
Jan
woodpeck_repair (2016-01-24 09:48:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 36468193, 36552577, 36488071, 36469677, 36511251, 36466751, 36759681, 36407734, 36759320, 36748674, 36728978, 36580909, 36471062, 36575245, 36466708, 36680735, 36581048, 36467242, 36455681, 36447929, 36581771, 36468117, 36468499, 36454503, 36741483, 36490572, 36575711, 36406879, 36464163, 36594002, 36468540, 36728437, 36741764, 36464080, 36509353, 36466015, 36741535, 36467493, 36406923, 36464458, 36454362, 36490418, 36728546, 36485489, 36558737, 36464337, 36463898, 36463469, 36487800, 36468064, 36558861, 36464207, 36466886, 36463958, 36550844, 36486447, 36489178, 36759427, 36467165, 36558045, 36455817, 36463572, 36759530.
baffioso (2016-01-24 10:34:40+00:00): Sad netop og skulle til at rette tags for denne, men du kom mig i forkøbet. Tak
MKnight (2016-08-07 11:12:40+00:00): what should "rightleft" means?
ShuriC13 (2016-08-07 20:19:09+00:00): It was a mistake. I`ve just corrected "leftright" to "through". Thanks.
GerdP (2016-01-25 07:33:18+00:00): Hi Emilio,
I've noticed a few nodes with highway=give_way + side=*, 
e.g side=right or side=both
What does that mean ?
Is it about the position of the traffic_sign?
E.g. at this roundabout:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186669074
species (2016-02-07 19:37:34+00:00): Bei 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3958179680
sowie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3958179666
Sind widersprüchliche Angaben bei 
healthcare:speciality und healthcare:speciality:de gesetzt.

Kümmern sich die um Körper oder Geist?
lg
colargol (2016-01-28 20:51:29+00:00): Quelle réactivité ! tu es en avance, l'arrêt ne va être déplacé que le 01/02. J'ai ajouté les feux.
Virgile1994 (2016-01-28 20:52:33+00:00): C'est pour ça que je n'ai pas changé la relation du bus. ;)
chnav (2016-07-24 16:29:56+00:00): Не надо так вольно обращаться с точками границы. Есть межгосударственный документ, описывающий границу, относительно геодезических пунктов до сотни метров. Даже на бинге есть грунтовки вдоль описательной границы, так что символические бетонный монументы на дороге ничего не означают. Вернул границу на место.
chnav (2016-07-24 16:30:31+00:00): ... в смысле границу в районе погранперехода Жанибек
gileri (2016-01-24 17:11:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Je me suis permis de retirer les éléments que vous avez ajouté sur le nœud d'adresse étant donné qu'ils sont déjà présents sur le pourtour du lycée (à part le site web que j'ai ajouté)
Andromaque (2016-02-12 19:44:11+00:00): Merci pour la rectification. 

Sinon pour corriger des itinéraires, faut-il directement s'adresser à la société qui les fourni?
gileri (2016-02-12 22:03:52+00:00): Pas de quoi :)

De quels itinéraires parle-t-on ?
Andromaque (2016-02-13 19:43:52+00:00): Ceux sur OSM avec la mention GraphHopper, Mapzen ou OSRM à côté.
gileri (2016-02-13 22:54:11+00:00): Ces moteurs d'itinéraires se basent sur les données OSM. Lorsqu'ils calculent  des itinéraires non optimisés, plusieurs choses sont possibles :

- Les données OSM ne reflètent pas la réalité (mauvais tags, routes déconnectées entre-elles)
- Le routeur a un bug ou le profil de routage n'est pas optimal.

Dans le premier cas, vous pouvez directement corriger les erreurs dans OSM s'il y en a. En cas de doutes ou problèmes inhérents au routeur (OSRM/GraphHopper...), vous pouvez poster sur le forum openstreetmap fr, ou sur la mailing list
literan (2016-01-24 12:52:09+00:00): правильно вот так:
name=Городская поликлиника №12
old_name=Городская поликлиника №75

В тег name не следует вставлять все подряд. Я исправил.
tvgir (2016-01-24 13:30:47+00:00): понял, но вашего исправления не нашел и поправил сам.
literan (2016-01-24 13:45:13+00:00): я исправил, но пока не выгрузил :))
tvgir (2016-01-24 13:47:18+00:00): не выгружайте, филиал добавил
literan (2016-01-24 17:04:27+00:00): да уж поздно)) ладно, сейчас исправлю, верну вашу версию
zors1843 (2016-01-24 12:47:01+00:00): Only part of this way is a path instead of a track ?
Stereo (2016-01-24 16:40:26+00:00): Hello, est-ce que tu as une source pour le changement de ref=* ? Merci!
Pa413 (2016-01-24 17:37:07+00:00): Bonjour à vous,

alors pour l'info depuis le 1er janvier 2011, à été crée la Métropole Nice Côte-d'Azur. Par conséquent la métropole à la charge de toute la voirie à l’intérieur de son territoire. La métropole à ainsi décidé de renommé toutes les routes à l'intérieur de son territoire. Concrètement les routes ne sont plus des départementales ''D'' mais désormais des routes métropolitaines ''M''. Pour finir les routes garde le numéro d'origine mais change de lettre. Exemple la D 25 devient la M 25. Avec un cartouche bleu ciel et écriture blanche.
 Un article pour confirmer mon commentaire http://www.weka.fr/actualite/urbanisme/article/des-bornes-bleu-cyan-au-bord-des-routes-metropolitaines-4214/ 

Pour votre information du côté de la Corse, les routes nationales deviennent des routes Territoriales. Source: http://www.corse.fr/Changement-de-denomination-des-routes-nationales-en-routes-territoriales-a-l-automne-2014_a4455.html

Cordialement.
blackadder (2016-01-25 10:00:56+00:00): Thanks for contributing. I tidied up your edit and added some of the local buildings. Is the new apartment block also called Shorley Court or does it have another name?
yatessteve (2016-01-25 17:04:02+00:00): The pub has been converted to 
Flats 1 2 3 4 and the apartment block continues 5 6 7 8 9 10 the whole complex is Shorley court
blackadder (2016-01-25 17:32:18+00:00): Cheers. Have added that info.
cleary (2016-07-09 08:17:55+00:00): I think way 39196209, footbridge across Parramatta River near Wilde Avenue, is beneath the road level, not on the road bridge (although there is also a footway on the road bridge but it does not provide access to the riverbank and walkway alongside river). Can we please remove layer=1 or raise the roadway to layer=2?
mrpulley (2016-07-09 13:12:16+00:00): OK - change made at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40611879
Hjart (2016-01-24 19:14:03+00:00): Hej
Jeg er helt enig med dig i dette. Jeg har bare lige fikset en række ting, som du ikke har været opmærksom på. Nogle af dem kræver lidt mere erfaring end man kan forvente af en forholdsvis uerfaren, så det er ok. Se http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36782104
ihbutler (2016-01-26 04:22:56+00:00): Hi, nice to see an update on the tennis courts at Timberdell, but I was wondering if you meant leisure=pitch rather than leisure=park? I sometimes get the terms confused myself.  The Westwood Park courts have it right, I think.

Cheers,   Ian
Essin (2018-08-05 13:00:07+00:00): https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#Can_I_copy_from_google_or_other_similar_sources.3F (The answer is no.) Everything added with Google as a source must be removed.
chillly (2016-01-25 16:10:51+00:00): Why have you drawn the building to be that shape? It is clearly not that shape.

If you are having problems understanding OSM I can revert (undo) this edit for you.
derFred (2016-01-25 16:54:36+00:00): Hi Chilly, sorry my rememberance was false. :(
chillly (2016-01-25 16:59:47+00:00): I've changed the building outline to match the footprint on the ground, not the outline of the roof. This is the way buildings should be drawn whenever possible. Parallax in aerial imagery can make this difficult, but in this case it was fairly easy.
derFred (2016-01-25 17:07:17+00:00): d'accord! :) thanks for the hint.
marcioaguiar (2016-01-25 13:51:49+00:00): Daniel, duas dicas: 
- não compartilhar nó de rio com nó da estrada. Deve passar por cima mesmo
- no caso de haver uma ponte coloque as tags bridge=yes e layer=1 no caminho, como eu fiz em http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393402368

Abraço
Daniel de Góes Nepomuceno (2016-01-25 14:04:36+00:00): Obrigado Márcio, erros antigos já não mais os cometo e estou corrigindo vários....Obrigado.
trial (2017-03-27 20:59:35+00:00): Pour l'arrêt Le Guennic (noeud 3964380044) je vois covered=yes et shelter=no. Comment peut-on avoir covered=yes ici ? Je ne vois pas de tranchée ni de bâtiment pouvant servir d'abri. Ce n'est pas simplement shelter=yes (ou no) ?
trial (2019-06-13 09:55:59+00:00): corrigé
chillly (2016-01-24 15:16:41+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM.

I see you have added addresses for the cottages as the name of the building. We reserve names on buildings for signed names, such as a shop name. Addresses get their own tags, e.g.  addr:housenuber=1, addr:street=Old Clapperton Hall and so on.

A house name can be added as addr:housename=Robins Nest. You can add both a house name and a house number using this scheme if needed. 

It is a common issue for new mappers to use the name tag too freely, so don't feel bad about a simple mistake. I hope you enjoy adding some more local details, sharing your local knowledge to improve the map for everyone.
전자지도 (2016-01-25 08:35:07+00:00): 구. 161번 -> 710번 단축
hatul (2020-11-25 19:41:51+00:00): אתה בטוח שהדרך הכחולה 85526131 עבירה לכל רכב? לא ניסיתי לנסוע אבל בריצה היא נראית לא מתאימה לרכב לפחות בחלק המערבי.
hatul (2020-11-25 19:42:09+00:00): גם במפת סמ״ש היא מסומנת כדרך ג׳יפים
zstadler (2020-11-26 08:15:03+00:00): הערך של tracktype לדרך זו לא השתנה בעריכה שלי. 

כדי לראות מתי זה קרה, אפשר להסתכל בהיסטוריה של האלמנט 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85526131/history
שם רואים שהערך נקבע ביצירת הדרך לפני כ 10 שנים.

בין אם הערך מעולם לא היה נכון, או היה נכון לפני 5 או 10 שנים, מה שקובע הוא המצב העדכני בשטח.
hatul (2020-11-26 09:32:08+00:00): אמחק את tracktype=grade2. ממילא הסמ״ש שם מיותר, הדרך לא מובילה לשום מקום חשוב ומטונפת נורא.
SomeoneElse (2023-03-24 10:27:09+00:00): Hi Derick,
Apologies for an "ancient hstory" question - just wondered if you had any idea whether the "Da Daniela" restaurant here is still "bring your own wine"?  The restaurant got moved to a node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6703856105 and then the bring your own wine tag was removed from the building as you can see at https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/123186015 .
Cheers,
Andy
traut (2021-09-25 14:17:10+00:00): Heißt die Straße tatsächlich Giegenberg oder Gigenberg? Das amtliche Straßenverzeichnis nennt Gigenberg. Es gibt Belege für beide Varianten.
5m4u9 (2016-01-31 11:02:02+00:00): Entiendo la necesidad de poner las instalaciones de la policía, pero no es necesario redundar en cada construcción que es la policía, basta con definir en el perímetro.

Además el perímetro es sólo eso una pared y no una construcción total del área... bajo un edificio.

Vuelvo a corregir.
Polarbear (2016-01-25 18:26:47+00:00): Hi, "community_centre:for" beschreibt die Zielgruppe, "environment" ist aber keine Person. Ich würde "community_centre=environment_centre" empfehlen.
ftrebien (2016-01-24 16:10:40+00:00): As ruas Bom Jesus e Ernestina Amaro Torelly não são terciárias por dois motivos: densidade local, e infraestrutura. O fato de ser rota de ônibus não é uma boa justificativa, há ônibus circulando em várias vias locais (residenciais) que são precárias demais, mesmo em comparação com outras vias próximas, para serem consideradas terciárias.
smaprs (2016-01-24 17:29:37+00:00): http://www2.portoalegre.rs.gov.br/spm/default.php?p_secao=308

R BOM JESUS
...
REGIME URBANÍSTICO
...
SISTEMA DE CIRCULAÇÃO
Alinhamento 09,00m do meio-fio
Largura do logradouro 22,00m
- - -
PDDUA - Lei 434
ANEXO 9.1
VIAS COLETORAS (V.3) 17,50 a 22,50m
Art. 10. As vias, de acordo com os critérios de funcionalidade e hierarquia,
classificam-se em:
I - Vias de Transição(V-1) - estabelecem a ligação entre o sistema rodoviário
interurbano e o sistema viário urbano...
II - Vias Arteriais (V-2) - permitem ligações intra-urbanas, com média ou alta fluidez de tráfego ... 
III - Vias Coletoras (V-3) - recebem e distribuem o tráfego entre as vias locais e
arteriais...
IV - Vias Locais (V-4)...
smaprs (2016-01-24 20:00:47+00:00): De onde você tirou que "não são terciárias por dois motivos: densidade local, e infraestrutura"? São preferenciais sobre as residenciais cf. schema_br2013. Portanto tertiary.
dudka (2016-01-29 07:28:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/49.20075/31.02724 - тут якесь підозріле місце.. судячи зі знімку ті дві дороги все ж з'єднані
Gontsa (2016-01-29 07:59:38+00:00): дякую, виправив!
Ars-UA (2016-01-24 21:12:40+00:00): На будущее: у нас все улицы города уже прописаны на трёх языках (украинский, русский и английский), так что при редактировании желательно прописывать их все. Спуск Артёма я поправил.
dudka (2016-01-25 15:35:15+00:00): http://marsovet.org.ua/image_add/File/2009/3/5-28-4951.doc
"спуск", а не "узвіз"
Ars-UA (2016-01-25 17:27:57+00:00): Принято, поправлю )
eggie (2022-01-22 18:23:47+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze .. Opnieuw welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community