piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
map per (2023-03-24 10:52:56+00:00): Hallo mawis,

weißt du ob die Bauarbeiten inzwischen fertig und der Heilhofweg wieder freigegeben ist?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
mawis (2023-03-24 10:58:19+00:00): Seit letzter Woche kann man effektiv mit dem Rad wieder durch fahren, die Zäune sind entfernt worden. Allerdings steht noch die Beschilderung, die den Durchgang nicht erlaubt (Zeichen 254 + Zeichen 259).
map per (2023-03-24 16:48:17+00:00): Ok, danke!
joel56dt (2022-11-03 20:18:42+00:00): Hello KingBoo, I don't see these roads on the aerial imagery - is there another source you used? I'm hoping it's something I can use myself.
Thanks, Joel
KingBoo (2022-11-03 21:04:18+00:00): The Aerial image is at least five years old. Google Earth has more up to date imagery. I was apart of the construction of the road last year.
joel56dt (2022-11-05 19:42:21+00:00): Thanks!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-02-29 22:03:29+00:00): Unfortunately this is not allowed. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data
Asly33 (2022-11-03 16:53:35+00:00): Frigintini
aixbrick (2022-11-03 08:05:23+00:00): Hallo,
mir diese "Korrektur" nicht ganz klar. Ich hatte vor 2 Monaten den separaten Weg zurückgebaut, weil es keine bauliche Trennung gibt.
Gruß
aachso (2022-11-03 15:31:43+00:00): Moin,

die Korrektur bezieht sich auf die Beschilderung auf der östlichen Seite der Krefelder Straße und das Routing auf der westlichen Seite von der CHIO-Brücke aus entlang der Krefelder Straße, was vorher nicht möglich war.

Man kann z.B. mit dem Rad aus der Gut-Dämme-Straße links abbiegen und darf dort bis zur Brücke linksseitig fahren, ab da geht es nur noch über die Brücke und dann auf der anderen Seite weiter.

Dass du das vor kurzem erst geändert hattest war mir dabei leider nicht aufgefallen. Wegen dem durchgehendenden Hochborstein hab ich das als separaten Weg eingezeichnet, weil der im gewissen Sinne eine bauliche Trennung darstellt (offenbar gibt es keine genaue definition im Wiki?) und weil praktisch der gesamte Platz ein Geh- und Radweg ist. Jedenfalls verstehe ich das Schild an der Albert-Servais-Allee so und die Tatsache, dass es abgesehen von einer dünnen Ablaufrinne keine erkennbare Trennung zwischen dem Schild und dem Platz gibt und dass der Radverkehr über die CHIO-Brücke geleitet wird, dort also offenbar auch auf dem Platz fahren darf.

Ganz korrekt wäre mMn eine area für den Geh- und Radweg, das hab ich aber gelassen, der Einfachheit halber und weil die Grenze nicht klar erkennbar ist.

Ich tendiere eher dazu, Radwege im Zweifel getrennt zu mappen, weil das so genauer ist und fehlende Details in der Verkehrsführung zu Problemen beim Routing führen können, z.B. beim links Abbiegen von der Fahrbahn.

Alternativ könnte man natürlich den Weg von der Brücke auf die Fahrbahn ziehen und den Radweg wieder auf der Fahrbahn mappen.
aixbrick (2022-11-03 18:12:16+00:00): >> (offenbar gibt es keine genaue definition im Wiki?)
Im Wiki vielleicht nicht, aber innerhalb der Community wird die Mehrheit einen Bordstein nicht als bauliche Trennung sehen.
>> Alternativ könnte man natürlich den Weg von der Brücke auf die Fahrbahn ziehen und den Radweg wieder auf der Fahrbahn mappen.
Das wäre wahrscheinlich die einfachere Lösung gewesen, sprich https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1109762693 hätte gereicht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-10 07:27:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289013157/history has shop = garden_hardware that was added in this edit
Is it shop=garden_centre ? If not, how it differs from shop=garden_centre? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=garden_centre
divaddivag (2026-05-10 07:51:59+00:00): Hi there, I see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgarden_machinery has been expanded since this edit. I believe is a much better fit to this business.
jleedev (2022-11-03 21:12:34+00:00): Can you explain your use of `office=yes` here?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-25 17:28:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808810571#map=16/43.8510/19.8550 - why you are using completely incorrect area=yes highway=service instead of area:highway?

Is it an attempt to force rendering of this area?
emersonveenstra (2022-11-11 13:06:56+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contribution! The `highway=service` tag needs to stay on the road, otherwise it's no longer a road at all. Would you mind adding that back?
LuminousPath (2022-11-13 14:11:09+00:00): Why? It's a private driveway.
emersonveenstra (2022-11-13 16:19:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway

"Use this tag on ways in conjunction with highway=service on a driveway"
emersonveenstra (2022-11-13 16:19:51+00:00): the service tag is a refining tag for highway=service, not a standalone tag
emersonveenstra (2022-11-17 12:58:38+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/12904147
wireguy (2022-11-02 22:17:55+00:00): Welcome to osm!  good updates to Lambertville.   I think there's  a new coffee shop, liberty on union street, where rojo's used to be.   Haven't been by in a while, may need to make a trip.
Kovoschiz (2022-11-03 02:59:42+00:00): Please don't remove `marking:*=`. This is being tested in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/separation#Symbolic_separation:_marking together with `separation:*=`. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/separation#Tagging_on_roads,_lanes_and_other_ways for examples.
Yaaaaaaaa (2022-11-03 10:05:19+00:00): ok thank you
joost schouppe (2023-03-09 19:56:56+00:00): Dit gaat wellicht teruggedraaid moeten worden. Deze fietspaden waren reeds gemapped als onderdeel van de weg, en staan nu dus dubbel in OSM. Je kunt dat op deze kaart goed zien: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1109765680#map=17/51.04041/5.57406&layers=Y
ybungalobill (2022-11-08 19:06:29+00:00): use the name as it appears on the building, which is "The Gayety Theatre Bldg." not "#_geog".
HellMap (2022-11-02 23:09:44+00:00): Hi!

If roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1109771761/history lead to isolated dwellings or farmyards, then they should most likely be tagged as driveways rather than tracks.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack example when a track is not the right classification: "A minor road providing primary access to one or several permanent residences (driveway)"
eggie (2022-11-03 11:36:04+00:00): Dag pruvo..
Je vraagt feedback.. 
'k Denk dat je een aparte tag 'moet' maken voor de afkorting.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:short_name

MVG
eggie.
Allison P (2023-01-03 04:39:16+00:00): Is it really called "Yurt?"? Or are you suggesting there may or may not be a yurt here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1109780398
Jrachi (2022-11-03 08:03:44+00:00): Ciao.
Se ho capito il commento di questo changeset stai cambiando la direzione delle way per adattarle alle relazioni?
Lavoro inutile. La direzione conta solo per le linee bus, per i corsi d'acqua, ecc.
Non serve ai percorsi escursionistici

Ivo, Jrachi
Vedo che hai fatto altre modifiche poco fa, ma controlla cosa hai fatto al bivio vicino all'alpe La Verna.
HAi interrotto il bivio, e rotto la relazione al 841
Hai anche aggiunto un isolated dwelling "La Verna" quando è già presente un più corretto locality "Alpe La Verna"
MushroomMan (2022-11-03 18:26:17+00:00): Correction: Source used was SDFE
gscholz (2022-11-06 06:31:19+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-04 06:45:15+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.50017&lat=-3.85469&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
marczoutendijk (2022-11-03 16:29:13+00:00): Hi Michelle,
Can you do your testing somewehere else? You are disturbing/vandalising OSM.
gscholz (2022-11-06 06:31:03+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-06 06:31:23+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-06 06:31:16+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-06 06:30:59+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Hufkratzer (2022-11-04 17:55:55+00:00): Hi, Reitplätze bitte als Reitplätze mappen und nicht als Reitanlagen, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding. Die Reitanlage "Horse Company" isr schon als Knoten gemappt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5682791814
Hufkratzer (2022-11-04 17:57:39+00:00): P.S. Es gibt in iD auch ein Preset für Reitplätze (sinnvollerweise mit dem Namen "Reitplatz")
ZuquetuPlexis (2022-11-05 08:14:13+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Hufkratzer (2022-11-05 11:43:32+00:00): Korrigiert hast du es aber noch nicht.
Hufkratzer (2022-11-06 23:09:45+00:00): Den Roundpen hast du jetzt als Reitplatz umgetaggt. Und was ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1109809082 ?
gscholz (2022-11-04 06:43:39+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-06 06:31:06+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-04 06:40:58+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.55660&lat=-3.72894&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Voirie_3M (2022-11-03 08:09:52+00:00): Bonjour,
quel + de représenter des chemins en polygone? Et en pedestrian alors que la rue dessous est en footway? J'avais compris que c'est plutot réservé aux places (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=pedestrian?uselang=fr)
Merci,
Bruno Béguin
gscholz (2022-11-04 06:49:13+00:00): Hi Marcus,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-47.31170&lat=-23.17565&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128413782

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
szedar (2022-11-11 07:58:47+00:00): Proszę popraw relacje https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4655115
WieKo68 (2022-11-12 10:45:04+00:00): Nad relacjami 3818065, 4655115 i 14779851 trwają prace sprawdzające, dlatego jeszcze wstrzymano dalszą edycję. Postaram się jak najszybciej wyedytować poprawne granice relacji
aceman444 (2022-11-17 20:45:08+00:00): Zdravim, ta zelena strecha ma na stene pri vchode napisane otvaracie hodiny 6-21 bez uvedenie mesiacov. Odkial pochadza Mar 1-Oct 10 Mo-Su 06:00-23:00 ? A tie vycnelky s building:levels=1 a level=5 nebudu fungovat, budu to diery. Opravim na building:levels=6 building:min_level=5.
Jose Riha (2022-11-17 20:55:22+00:00): Mesiace boli uvedene kratko pred uzavretim strechy - teraz uz si neviem presne vybavit kde. Myslim, ze na jednej z tabul popri bezeckej drahe to bolo uvedene.
aceman444 (2022-11-17 20:59:59+00:00): Pri Vychode Parickova pri schodoch na tu strechu je vyslovne uvedene, ze hodiny su zmenene do 21:00. A znamena to teda, ze teraz je uz strecha zatvorena? Bol som tam vcera a schody otvorene boli. Ale je mozne, ze vedu aj na parkovisko, nie len na strechu. No chcelo by to preverit.
Jose Riha (2022-11-18 13:54:58+00:00): Pojdem to opat pozriet.
Jose Riha (2022-11-18 23:23:14+00:00): Pri vstupe cez vytah umiestneny na prizemi v McDonalds je na dverach pred Zelenou strechou uvedene:
Otvaracie hodiny
..
Zelena strecha (1.3 - 31. 10)
PO-NE od 6.00 hod. do 23.00 hod.

To iste potom parkrat i na tabuliach pri detskych ihriskach. Pri dalsom vytahu je vyvesny stit informujuci o skratenych otvaracich hodinach od 06:00h do 21:00h.

Podla vsetkeho by dnes (19. 11.) mala byt strecha pre navstevnikov uzavreta. Ale nie je tomu tak. Cert aby sa v tom vyznal :-(
aceman444 (2022-11-20 21:55:02+00:00): No presne, cize su tam rozporne informacie.
Jose Riha (2022-11-21 19:52:39+00:00): Napisal som im cez kontaktny formular. Dam vediet, ked odpisu.
aceman444 (2023-01-12 22:09:58+00:00): Naozaj, informacia o otvoreni len Mar-Oct je uz aj pri vchode z Parickovej a aj na samotnej streche. Pritom pristup na strechu je volne pristupny, dokonca tam navstevnikom hraju spev vtakov. Teraz v januari. Takze tie napisy su dobre nezmyselne.
gscholz (2022-11-06 06:30:54+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-06 06:31:09+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-06 06:31:12+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.51363&lat=-3.77049&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
matheusgomesms (2022-11-08 17:18:57+00:00): Hi Guido,

Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We recently updated our script, which solved some problems but introduced others we believe.

Also, we are not sure, but it seems that iD validator is stricter than JOSM one (we are using JOSM, and we only upload the data after fixing the errors pointed by JOSM validator), and the errors pointed by iD are the same pointed by Geofabrik.

After uploading, we verify manually each building using Tasking Manager + iD, so we are definitely fixing those errors. Unfortunately we had to stop the fixing these past days due to personal problems, but we already returned the fixing.

Anyway, we halted the importing of new buildings until we solve all these issues (both on the uploaded data already on OSM and on the script).

Thanks once again!
Best,
Matheus
gscholz (2022-11-04 06:41:52+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro-imports,
this import has created a huge amount of errors in the OSm database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting ways:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-38.54369&lat=-3.75255&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
neuhausr (2022-11-03 16:19:24+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for making this update. Do you know if the parking areas have also been removed? Although the street is gone from OSM the parking is still there...  Happy mapping!
marczoutendijk (2022-12-09 10:40:36+00:00): Hello,
For this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463305271#map=17/40.05876/-80.68440
you have "source=Google Maps" on it, but we can't actually use that as a source in OSM (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F for details).
Bing shows exactly the same and is free to use. Can you change it?
Also for possible other edits you did with Google as source.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
gscholz (2022-11-05 06:13:27+00:00): Hi  Betha,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-55.72290&lat=-22.55794&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128415631

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Diacritic (2022-11-03 06:45:49+00:00): Hi Wilburl,

Thanks for your contributions to SE Melbourne. :)

Unfortunately, the PTV website does not have a compatible data license and cannot be used as a source for contributions into OpenStreetMap.

The Australian mapping community has compiled a list of compatible sources on the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources.

Happy to answer any questions you have.

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128416002
wilburl (2022-11-03 06:59:15+00:00): Hi Dian,

Thanks for picking that up. I've been adding data based on my own memory of the route, Bing Aerial map and combined with PTV data.

What's the best course of action to rectify this? Do I rollback all my recent bus changes?

Thanks
Diacritic (2022-11-03 07:10:02+00:00): Hey Wilburl,

No stress at all. :)

Public transportation routes are a bit tricky to map! Any information which you've sourced directly from PTV does need to be removed, but the data you've remembered or gathered from aerial imagery can be kept.

So, for example, stop reference numbers from the PTV website should be removed, but numbers you've collected by going to the bus stop and recording it can be kept.

Hope that makes sense!
OldManCelli (2022-11-21 14:22:48+00:00): It looks like you changed an administrative boundary to a highway in this changeset. The Clear Creek township boundary was affected by this change. I'm not sure how you might have managed to do that but I will reverted that part of your change so the admin boundary isn't a road.
Johnson County (IA) GIS (2022-11-21 14:25:47+00:00): Thanks.  I certainly did not mean to update the Tiffin City boundary, although it does need updating due to some recent annexations, in this case.  I just wanted to change the street name.
OldManCelli (2022-11-21 15:57:27+00:00): Weird - I wonder what happened. If I may suggest, if you are an iD editor you may want to try the rapid editor - it has a few bug fixes that the iD editor doesnt and also includes building data sets from ESRI as suggested features.
Kuritsyn Roman (2022-11-03 15:49:14+00:00): Зачем name:ru=Усть-Каменогорск Г.А. перенсели в alt_name:ru=Усть-Каменогорск Г.А. удалив name:ru?
mavl (2022-11-03 16:37:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128446912 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128418168].
emersonveenstra (2022-11-12 19:04:13+00:00): badly formatted website and phone
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128416579
TimothyOnline (2022-11-12 20:54:09+00:00): Corrected per specifications.  Thanks.
ovruni (2022-11-03 06:16:59+00:00): Hola Jeanfranco, para las zonas dentro de Lima existe la imagen de Esri Clarity (Beta) que tienen una mejor resolución.
Saludos
Kuritsyn Roman (2022-11-03 15:54:49+00:00): Не удаляйте названия объектов на других языках
mavl (2022-11-03 16:37:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128446912 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128418168].
user_6110846 (2023-03-02 09:35:58+00:00): @mavl deleting Kazakh names in Kazakstan is your wrong decision. It is possible to return Russian names in a different way, namely by a separate edit in each object. The cartographer had no intention of spoiling the object. The cartographer had the intention to improve the object.
Kuritsyn Roman (2022-11-03 16:00:41+00:00): Пожалуйста не вносите изменения в названия объектов пока не  ознакомьтесь со статьями по наименованию объектов, Вы делаете это не правильно, не стоит удалять названия на других языках, альтернативное название это другое.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
mavl (2022-11-03 16:28:24+00:00): Здравствуйте, Vladimir Kamenev. Пожалуйста, не удаляйте правильные данные.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
user_6110846 (2023-04-01 04:31:53+00:00): че за бред 
с каких пор названия на госсударствоеннгом язьіке Казастана стали неправильньіми 

где написано что данньіе на казахском язьіке ето неправильньіе данньіе и где написано что русский язьік есть главнее чем казахский
Kuritsyn Roman (2023-04-25 15:36:31+00:00): Тема в том что удаляются названия, а не добавляется название на конкретном языке. Идёт потеря данных.
user_6110846 (2023-04-26 05:24:27+00:00): главньім язьіком тегирования в Казхастане должен бьіть казахский 

то что главньім язьіком картографирования есть российский язьік есть неправильно 
Ето говорит о том что казахское сообщество двигается в неправильном направлении 

нет никакого оправдания удалению названий на казахском 

я не картиографирую  в КАзахстане 
надоело наблюдать  как унижаеться казахский и что главное что казахи на ето унижение смотрять спустя рукава