piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
AgusQui (2016-04-04 23:53:27+00:00): Confirmado Sefer, no hay MacDonals y Carrefour, creo que te confundiste con los de Av. San Martín
Sefer (2016-04-05 18:04:43+00:00): @AgusQui : Ok , gracias! Saludos
chillly (2016-02-20 22:20:27+00:00): This looks like a mass edit. Where was this discussed?
SomeoneElse (2016-02-22 11:45:39+00:00): I don't see how the change to http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=51559512 or http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=4244264 was opening hours related.  Can you explain what happened there?
tekim (2016-02-26 21:29:46+00:00): It looks like you left your keyboard unattended and someone has been playing using your account. OpenStreetMap data is used by people around the world for real applications, in particular this data in Haiti is being used to help eradicate malaria from one of the poorest populations on Earth.
mavl (2016-02-27 00:55:27+00:00): Dear G Jenny. Please, don't add nonexistent objects.
naoliv (2016-02-20 02:08:53+00:00): Não coloque "Retorno" como nome das ruas...
ajithkarunaratne (2016-02-25 07:17:39+00:00): Dear Kasun,

Just noticed your updates in OSM maps. There is a forum called http://lkosm.freeforums.net/ in which all active Sri lankan mappers share there knowledge. I would like to kindly invite you to be member of that forum and share your knowledge and vice-versa.

Thanks.

Ajith Karunaratne
GerdP (2016-02-22 07:56:49+00:00): Hi there!
Please review highway=TR
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398789497
I guess you meant highway=track but it looks more like a residential or unclassified road to me.
What is correct?
naoliv (2016-02-20 02:13:41+00:00): Quionzo, essas restrições de conversão que envolvem a mesma rua (proibido retornar nela mesma), não devem ser mapeadas.
R0bst3r (2016-02-22 14:14:39+00:00): Hi dudone,
can you improve the tag layer=0=gate on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398790760?
dudone (2016-02-22 20:55:17+00:00): Deleted.  It was a typo.  I was thinking it should have a layer tag as it is below the level of the road.  It actually goes under the bridge which has been deleted.  Presumably because it is currently closed.
ma-rt-in (2016-02-20 16:28:39+00:00): Hi,

du weißt ja schon das Kindel kein Dorf ist sondern nur ein Teil von Kinheim?
kjon (2016-03-06 16:21:25+00:00): place=suburb ist definitiv falsch (vgl. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place). ich hab den node jetzt zu place=neighbourhood geändert. das sollte passen.
Nakaner-repair (2016-02-19 20:19:37+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 37292170, 37292684, 37293260, 37303742, 37303775.
Nakaner-repair (2016-02-19 20:21:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 37292170, 37292684, 37293260, 37303742, 37303775.
mgpx (2016-02-20 22:47:55+00:00): Mit keres egy forgalmi jelzőlámpa a Bükk-fennsík közepén?
literan (2016-02-20 12:02:28+00:00): Строительство пятого пути до Мытищ
maning (2016-02-22 06:27:52+00:00): Hi didier2020, one of our mappers reported that ~100,000 nodes were deleted last Friday.  We checked the history and we found out about your edits.  Looking at it quickly it seems you are deleting duplicate nodes.

Thank you for the cleanup, however, we appreciate if you inform our country mailinglist (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph) about this action so that local mappers know this is happening.

Also related to the following changesets:
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37317404
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37317135
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37316973
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37316831
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37316554
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37316477
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37316435
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37316390
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37316354
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37316340
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37316074
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/37315888
mavl (2016-02-20 14:58:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок много удалений.  
  
Почему удалена библиотека? [http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/617526051/history]  
Её больше нет?  
  
Почему удалён тег amenity=school с гимназии № 21? [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25447895/history]. Для учреждений среднего образования тег amenity=school обязателен.  
  
Удалены 4 точки университета [например, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/990840000/history]. Четыре точки это, конечно, дубликаты, но одну точку с таким тегом нужно было обязательно оставить (или перенести этот тег на одно из зданий). Если какое-либо заведение (больница, школа, детсад) имеет много зданий на одной территории, то рекомендуют [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dschool] обвести все эти здания замкнутой линией, и на эту линию поставить тег этого заведения.  
  
В теге name не нужно использовать сокращения. Не нужно указывать name=ТюмГНГУ. Этого сокращения многие люди не знают [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия]. Нужно избегать сокращений и указывать названия полностью.
orlov_vs (2016-02-20 15:46:37+00:00): По библиотеке: там нет научной библиотеки ТюмГНГУ, точка вообще указывала на спортзал ТюмГНГУ
более того в ТюмГНГУ нет научной библиотеки (см. www.tsogu.ru), есть зал научной литературы в составе БИЦ, но он находится в другой части города (Мельникайте 72 к. 1)
orlov_vs (2016-02-20 15:51:03+00:00): По тегу ammenity направил вам вопрос в личном сообщении. Тэг ammenity обозначает территорию школы, а не само здание. Само здание школы обозначается тегом building=school (kindergarten/college/univercity). См. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dschool В этой статье черным по белому написано, а на картинке еще и показано для каких объектов какие теги обязательны.
orlov_vs (2016-02-20 15:54:01+00:00): В упомянутой выше статье про точки напротив ничего не сказано, напротив написано, что необходимо указать название в тегах объектов. Зачем указывать точки университета, вся необходимая информация внесена в теги зданий?
orlov_vs (2016-02-20 16:01:41+00:00): Прошу не обращать внимания на предыдущий комментарий. Отвечу проще, вся информация была внесена в теги зданий.
orlov_vs (2016-02-20 16:04:06+00:00): Еще одино замечание на Ваш комментарий. При редактировании карты в iD при попытке поставить тег amenity=school автоматически исчезает тэг building=school (который является обязательным для здания школы в соответствии с http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dschool)
orlov_vs (2016-02-20 16:07:23+00:00): Замечания по сокращению принимаю, внесу необходимые исправления, дискуссию по поводу выбора тегов (amenity=school или building=school) для зданий детсадов, школ, университетов предлагаю перенести в ЛС
orlov_vs (2016-02-20 16:18:58+00:00): Насколько я понимаю должно быть так:
территория д/с https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398925307
само здание:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76372084
orlov_vs (2016-02-22 18:41:59+00:00): внес необходимые изменения в соответствии с рекомендациями
RSergei (2016-02-27 16:11:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. У меня к Вам 2 вопроса:
1) Зачем удалять названия корпусов институтов ТюмГНГУ? Или в связи с наступающем переименованием всё переиначили?
2) 7 корпус университета на углу 50 Лет Октября и Мельникайте - он был отлично нарисован каждая часть здания с разной этажностью - нарисована отдельно. Так и должно было быть, нехватало только building:part=. Может стоит вернуть?
orlov_vs (2016-02-28 15:05:35+00:00): Отвечу по порядку:
1)Все переиначили еще с 1 сентября. Сейчас 3й и 7й корпуса содержат помещения ИГИНа, ИМИБа, ИПТИ и НИПИ НГП. Как предлагаете их подписать? В 5м корпусе вообще непонятно кто (вроде его хотели передать ИПК). С 1м тоже не все так просто, как и со зданием машиностроительного техникума. В итоге какой корпус к какому институту относится сейчас до конца не ясно. Поэтому в теге description номера учебных корпусов указаны, а названия институтов из тегов убраны. В связи с преобразованием ВУЗа возможны и новые изменения. Как руководство со структурой определится - так изменения и внесем:)
2) В 7м корпусе была прорисована вертикальная структура. Это характерно для зданий, состоящих из нескольких частей/корпусов/очередей. Однако это здание представляет собой один цельный неделимый по вертикали объект. В нем конструктивно есть деление по горизонтали на уровне 4го, 6го, 10 этажей. Готов прорисовать разную этажность здания с заданием горизонтальной структуры (building:parts=horizontal), как только разберусь как это сделать.
RSergei (2016-02-28 17:47:39+00:00): 1) Вопрос отпал))
2) Ну что-же похвально, что сами готовы, для примера по Тюмени:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4554720
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5172879
Но лучше перейти на JOSM для рисования, в iD замаетесь, если вообще это возможно
RSergei (2016-02-28 17:48:39+00:00): Ещё вопрос скорее личного характера)) Вы до этого в НЯК рисовали?
mgpx (2016-02-20 22:49:00+00:00): Mit keresnek településre, városra utaló POI-k a Bükk fennsík közepén?
Nakaner (2016-02-20 20:45:56+00:00): Korrektur: Das war am 14.2.2016
mgpx (2016-02-20 22:50:06+00:00): Miért változott meg a Tar-kő típusa csúcsról parkra?
mgpx (2016-02-20 22:51:35+00:00): Miért került a kilátópontra utaló tourism=viewpoint jelzés eltávolításra?
user_5359 (2016-02-20 04:43:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short remark to your change: A tree has no name like "Apple Tree"! Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
unsungNovelty (2016-03-22 06:45:18+00:00): Hi Elia Z,

I have observed that some data has been deleted for this area through this changeset.
Can you please provide the source and reason for deleting the data?
dgitto (2016-06-23 11:43:47+00:00): Ciao, name="defibrillatore" non è un po' troppo nome comune e un po' poco nome proprio? (E tra l'altro è talmente ridondante da essere la traduzione precisa del tag) Lo so che non lo hai inserito tu, ma era la scusa per chiedere: in questi casi chiudiamo un occhio a favore del rendering?
Ale_Zena_IT (2016-06-23 12:15:21+00:00): Ciao, direi che è proprio ridondante
dgitto (2016-06-23 12:36:01+00:00): Ce ne sono parecchi mappati così. Bisognerebbe decidere in ML cosa dovrebbe andare nel name: se il nome con cui il proprietario lo indentifica ("Farmacia Bombazzi" o nulla, o "Defibrillatore della farmacia Bombazzi" o chissà cosa.
ha5vsa (2025-10-28 20:20:10+00:00): Szent István-szoborra milyen forrásból lett artist_name=Raffay Béla?
user_5359 (2016-02-20 04:47:51+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! itte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a .
chillly (2016-02-21 14:48:46+00:00): Another undiscussed mechanical edit? Please stop making these - someone will just have to revert it.
wvdp (2016-02-21 23:51:03+00:00): It is a handmade edit. But something went wrong with level 0 and all items that were loaded had a there version updated even when I didn’t edit them. What was being done was: searching for errors with a text editor and then fixing them. Sorry it looks bad
SomeoneElse (2016-02-22 11:53:28+00:00): I'm guessing that the "unexpected change" at http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=364690421 was to trim trailing spaces on tags?

Also what was the source for the "and then fixing them"?  It can't have been Mapbox Satellite.
wvdp (2016-02-23 10:28:22+00:00): first i'd like to decaire some other changesets of my with the same caractioristics.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37315870
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37320114
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37334967
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37335079
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37335272
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37335834
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37336708
wvdp (2016-02-23 10:44:49+00:00): What I did is I downloaded the UK form geofabrick and then filleted all nodes ways and relations that have opening hours.
This results in a 50 mb file that covers all of the UK and has only things with opening hours. That I load in to josm and I validate all things using the build in validator and then I fix some stuff. 
Like I look at the opening hours stated and I write them in the syntax that we all agreed on. I also follow some recommended changes that josm provides. Like trimming spaces at the end of properties and values. 
Lastly there are some values for openings hours that josm can’t parse the openings hours and it doesn’t have a fix for it. Those I write to a smaller osm file and put in to level 0. From there I paste the generated text in to my favorite text editor and then I search for things I can change so that josm can read them. For example I search for “0800” and change that to “08:00” so that josm understands it again. And those changes I upload again and then validate them again and fix them.
And for the source it is something that was already in the change set and I forgot to remove it. The only source that I use is osm and the website of the company if I can’t read the openings hours.
So I like to think that the change sets fall in the category of handmade mechanical edits. I let the machine look for the errors and I fix them.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-23 11:37:57+00:00): Thanks for the detailed explanation.  Were there any examples of "opening hours set to something that makes no sense, but would make sense if applied to another key"?  Were you able to figure out what do do in those cases, or did you add an OSM note or ask the previous mapper?
For a comparison, I recently did something similar with "no=yes" tag/value pairs - even with something as common as that, it was often possible to guess the thing that should have been set to "yes".
wvdp (2016-02-23 12:21:27+00:00): i mostly ignored it and did somthing else but  i also could add a note.
Nakaner (2016-02-21 09:54:24+00:00): Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz Feldwege mit Gewässern verbunden? Sind das wirklich Furten oder war das ein Fehler? Bitte korrigiere das. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4015525319
Nakaner (2016-02-21 09:56:22+00:00): Warum hast du von Gebäuden wie diesem (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396610459) building=* entfernt? Ist das ein Kraftwerk ohne Dach und Wände?

Das betrifft auch einige Trafostationen, die du in diesem Änderungssatz bearbeitet hast.

Ich möchte dich bitten, dass du das korrigierst.
trigpoint (2016-02-20 16:12:12+00:00): Historic pubs do not really belong in OSM, we aim to map what exists today.
There is a project http://www.openhistoricalmap.org which is based on OSM where you can add historic item.
Cheers Phil
SK53 (2016-02-21 10:33:23+00:00): @trigpoint has drawn my attention to this. If the buildings still exist I would advocate mapping them as polygons, tagged building=pub (provided this was what they were built for). On a general basis I'd agree with trigpoint, but I see no harm in adding a limited amount of historical info providing it does not interfere with mapping of what's there currently. Once you reach that point then OHM may be more useful (although then you need to research the dates pubs were active). You may be interested in the old pub layers on Evesham Mapped (http://www.evesham-mapped.org.uk/map/?z=12&lon=-1.95361&lat=52.07253&bgl=OSM,1,16&l=closedpubs) and OSM-Nottingham (http://osm-nottingham.org.uk/?z=11&lon=-1.17732&lat=52.96221&bgl=OSM,1,18&l=closedpubs). Ultimately if mapping of this type of object  becomes more widespread then we probably do need to use an alternative platform.
GOwin (2016-02-21 06:31:32+00:00): Hi Eli. It's not necessary to tag hydrants with name, like
name=Hydrant

For details, check out:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=fire%20hydrant

Great to see you using OsmAnd now. :)
mathieuS (2018-05-04 12:38:55+00:00): Why would you remove the path attribute of the bridges !? 

Bridge does not tell you which is the underlying physical feature. You need a highway=* key-value pair.
mathieuS (2018-05-04 12:41:35+00:00): Reverted in changeset #58678431
Marco @ Sente (2018-05-04 12:45:58+00:00): Paths not connected to anything are not helpful. If you add them back then connect them to some other ways, street or otherwise. From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways :

"Unconnected ways mean that any applications which rely on routing (like SatNav systems) will not be able to route into that way, or will not be routed via the quickest or shortest route.

Also, if the gap between the ways is significant, then users looking at a map on their computer screen or a printed map may see a gap between the ways on their map and be misled to believe there is no way through between one road and another"
mathieuS (2018-05-04 12:54:27+00:00): Don't map for the renderer, don't map for the router.

Do not confuse unconnected ways and ways connecting to a highway area (a pedestrian area in this case).

Routing applications are able to route through a highway area (squares, etc.).

If you think the ways should be connected to other ways directly, then do that. But in no case you should remove a physical feature that was correctly mapped.
Marco @ Sente (2018-05-23 10:54:55+00:00): My mistake, I didn't realize the bridges were connected to the Place de la Navigation. Sorry for the trouble.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-03 13:22:07+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2497824565 actually a tourist attraction (i.e. something that you can visit) or is it just a place where something in the past happened?  If so, a personal map (perhaps using something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/ ) would be better than pretending that it was a current tourist attraction.
Weasel-Wiesel (2016-06-04 13:27:29+00:00): No, nothing there really. I changed it because it was tagged as a viewpoint, which does not make any sense. Feel free to delete.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-04 15:20:25+00:00): Handily, I had a chat on IRC with someone who'd done "the Ripper Rour" just after adding this comment.  They did stop here, so in a sense it is a "tourist attraction" in that it attracts tourists, even though there's nothing signposted.  I've left it for now, but suggested on IRC that anyone more local might want to delete if they thought it didn't belong there.
MKnight (2016-05-13 15:16:49+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398835793#map=18/51.26655/9.67077

ist wahrscheinlich eher turn:lanes:forward gemeint?
martinum4 (2016-05-13 15:33:08+00:00): Oops, jap, ich ändere es mal...
GS25 (2016-11-02 09:33:53+00:00): Hi there,

The roads I looked at in South Korea are badly misaligned.  Aerial photos are often poorly aligned and must be adjusted.  Please use GPS traces and realign the aerial photos before using them.
rab (2016-03-06 12:13:33+00:00): Use JOSM! 
estimate the width of the roads with the measurement plugin.
 Tag every road less than 2m as path. Apply "simplify way" to get rid of superfluous nodes
maraf24 (2016-02-20 23:46:59+00:00): Drogi mapujący!
To jest punkt adresowy, który tu usunąłeś:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3236798730/history
Zwróć uwagę, że jest tam wiele dodatkowych pól, m.in. nazwa ulicy, które zignorowałeś wpisując adres do budynku.
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-14 03:44:03+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398862506 under construction? Imagery doesn't suggest it is
pedrojuan01 (2016-06-14 09:33:20+00:00): Take a look to the lastest "orto" image at: http://www.conselldemallorca.net/sitmun/idemallorca.jsp
Commodoortje (2016-03-05 16:46:18+00:00): incompleet object
area=yes is niets.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398864081
Vintagejhan (2016-02-22 11:03:56+00:00): 總算看到你更新啦~
R0bst3r (2016-02-22 16:45:33+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM.
Um Objekte richtig zu kennzeichnen, muss man vordefinierte Werte verwenden. Diese sind in englischer Sprache.

Sie sind hier dokumentiert: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

Als Beispiel wie es aussehen sollte: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4016250275

Viel Erfolg noch!
Nakaner (2016-02-20 20:45:44+00:00): Korrektur: Das war am 14.2.2016
FTA (2016-02-22 05:23:17+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed you added some keys that are a little strange. Category usually is indicated instead by something such as amenity=, shop=, office=, etc. You also duplicated the keyword tag, but the uncapitalized form is preferred. Let me know if you have any questions. Ethan aka FTA
VictorIE (2024-09-06 21:48:11+00:00): Him

Which lanes were Blackmoor Lane, Clampet Lane?

old_name=Blackmoor Lane can be added.
aceman444 (2016-02-20 18:07:10+00:00): Dobry den, co chybalo na budove centraly VUB? Preco ste museli budovu zakreslit znovu (s inymi obrysmi) a teraz je duplictne? Nevidim ziadny prinos noveho obrysu.
bihi (2016-02-21 08:20:28+00:00): Dobry den, budova centraly VUB nebola zakreslena ako budova a ako budovu som ju potreboval mat zakreslenu pre svoje uceli. Ospravedlnujem sa ak vznikol nejaky problem. Mozem vymazat mnou zakreslenu budovu aby nebola duplicita.
aceman444 (2016-02-21 13:48:35+00:00): Dobry den, budova bola zakreslena ako budova, ale na relacii (multipolygon, relation 1270596). To je vsak standardne tagovanie a mame takych budov v Bratislave vela.
Ano, robi to problem, je to teraz duplictne, pozrite napr. na http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=48.1471419&lon=17.1257880&zoom=19&camera.theta=44.714&camera.phi=12.319, budovy sa prekryvaju. Dam teda novu verziu prec, aby ste videli rozdiel.

Je mozne, ze Vam ten multipolygon v editore iD, ktory pouzivate, nezobrazuje spravne. Odporucame pouzivat JOSM, ak je to pre Vas aspon trochu mozne. Dakujem.
Владимир К (2016-07-12 12:13:43+00:00): а вы здесь http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398905983 перила забором нарисовали?
MosKartograf (2016-08-04 10:04:37+00:00): Да, перила здесь нарисованы ограждением. handrail отметил, но чем это лучше не знаю пока.
Владимир К (2016-08-11 05:24:42+00:00): Ну как бы это ошибка же. Забор это забор. Ограждение. Перила - часть лестницы, помогающая по ней передвигаться. Соответственно это свойство лестницы, которое должно учитываться при прокладке маршрута через лестницы. А забор просто забор рядом с лестницей. Так что уберите, пожалуйста, забор.
Hjart (2016-02-23 14:04:08+00:00): Du har været uheldig at lave en del rod her (overlappende veje mm). Jeg har ryddet op i det.
Martin_Jensen (2016-02-23 18:01:52+00:00): Hej Hjart - tak for det. Der gik noget galt med upload/opdater i JOSM.

/Martin
mavl (2019-03-07 16:26:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
EneaSuper (2016-02-20 19:25:15+00:00): Sottopassaggio MMontano?
sabas88 (2016-02-20 19:36:59+00:00): Typo :-)
orlov_vs (2016-02-20 15:36:01+00:00): ошибка в описании правок, изменено описание общежития ТюмГНГУ
mavl (2019-03-07 16:26:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:26:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
dieterdreist (2021-10-04 07:19:01+00:00): non tutti gli edifici sono appartamenti, ad esempio la sede ACI è un ufficio
mavl (2019-03-07 16:26:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
trigpoint (2016-02-20 16:17:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Don't worry about the historic pubs, the really don't belong in OSM as we map what exists and is verifiable. I have commented on the addition of those historic pubs and am waiting for a response from the other mapper.
Cheers Phil
mavl (2019-03-07 16:26:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
tabris (2016-02-21 16:22:51+00:00): Hi,
lösch bitte nicht ohne Ortskenntnisse einfach irgendwelche Verkehrszeichen.
Hab es wieder dahin gepflanzt.
P.S.: Und ja, da hängt tatsächlich ein Mülleimer am Verkehrschild. Habe das mal auf zwei Nodes aufgeteilt damit das (hoffentlich) länger überlebt...