piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ali 1375 (2022-05-02 09:06:49+00:00): i don't think correcting names is vandalism. there is lots of reasons for my changes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Saudi_map_of_Persian_gulf_1952.jpg
alester (2022-05-05 21:35:44+00:00): This is not the location of Panda Place, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Duncan Bayne (2022-05-01 23:41:02+00:00): I'm not entirely sure whether changing the address will change the pinpoint location?  

This is my first time editing OSM, which I'm using now that I've switched to my PinePhone.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
LockOnGuy (2022-05-01 23:48:14+00:00): This changset revert user/adsfzxcv's vandalism edits in changeset 120412812 , 120412408, and 120411956. Changeset 120411956, was part reverted by user Fred73000 in changeset 120429263     
adsfzxcv is a Sock puppet account for user/RealNamesMatter
ali 1375 (2022-05-02 08:31:19+00:00): its not vandalism. i'm trying to correct a historic and international name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Gulf#Name
you are vandalizing because removing change without reason.
and yes, its a backup account for RealNamesMatter. and i don't think having two account is forbidden in OSM.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
alester (2022-05-05 21:34:03+00:00): The roads Bazan Bay Road and Lowe Road are not contained in these locations in the StatsCan dataset, but do appear incorrectly in Google Maps, so that was likely used as the source. Wardle Road does exist in both, so I think you just got lucky with that one.
Oregonian3 (2022-05-02 00:14:23+00:00): This changeset introduced a lot of errors where the streams cross trails. However, in this case, the streambed and the trail are one and the same for large sections. So it's not truly a "crossing" that's happening here, but rather the stream and the trail co-existing for certain time periods. Is there a better way for me to map this?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
eggie (2022-05-02 05:50:24+00:00): Dag DEYB
Tip  
Speeltuintjes tag je met leisure=palyground (Dat geeft het symbool) en dan evt de specificatie playgroud=......  Er mist dus nog een tag. 
sport=.........  is de specificatie vcan club=sport.. (Die ontbreekt nog)  en dan name=...
Met die garages is iets vreemds gebeurd. Waarschijnlijk door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Daar passen nu geen auto's meer in.
Kijk je nog even?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120439612

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-02 05:52:41+00:00): garages hersteld
eggie (2022-05-02 05:58:48+00:00): De sportveldjes aangepast als vlak  als voorbeeld.
De clubs kunnen ook op de adresnodes.
gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:52:31+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
Glassman (2022-05-02 20:56:26+00:00): Sorry but I'm going to have to revert this edit because you used Google as a source. Google's terms of service doesn't allow any copying of data. I'll send you more information on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120440311
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:53:01+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
Glassman (2022-05-02 20:57:51+00:00): Sorry I'm going to have to revert this changeset because you used Google as a source.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120440504
dave_in_ag (2022-05-02 13:44:33+00:00): Were the barriers for this crossing recently removed?  For at least about the last 30 years there were half width barriers.
vaw24 (2022-05-02 18:21:36+00:00): There aren't barriers for the sidewalks crossing the railroad, but I couldn't remember whether the roadway barriers were half or full width so I didn't change that node; I'll check next time I'm on campus.
dave_in_ag (2022-05-02 18:28:31+00:00): Ah, I see!  I thought the nodes were placed there because that's where the arm bases are located, not because it's to indicate whether the sidewalk (such as it is) has its own barrier.  Thanks for the lesson. :-)
vaw24 (2022-05-02 19:15:57+00:00): Ah, I see the confusion. I'm new to streetcomplete and OSM so I appreciate the feedback. Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-02 08:00:19+00:00): Source?  How do you know it is closed or has been for 3 years?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:44:07+00:00): Heard about on the news, also visited this store to find out it was closed
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-02 23:01:56+00:00): You have done a lot of traveling to say you visited in person to verify.  I find it unlikely given all your other travel "in person edits".  

And if you found it in the news, which news source?  And why would you verify in person if it was on the news?  Just redundant.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 18:14:27+00:00): Well this time, it is true, I am not lying
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 18:15:22+00:00): https://globalnews.ca/news/3162366/macys-to-close-grand-forks-location/
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 18:17:10+00:00): Dated January 2017!, This means that this store was closed for more than 5 years! Why was it still on OSM?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 18:23:36+00:00): https://www.grandforksherald.com/newsmd/grand-forks-macys-closes-for-good, It was closed down Sunday March 27, 2017 to be exact, it is now May 2022! I deleted it because it is not accurate to have Macy's displayed in this location over 5 years after permanently closing.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 18:24:13+00:00): There is no Source saying it is still open
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2022-05-03 19:06:40+00:00): @popeye  Curious as to why your quoting local canadian (toronto based) new sources for edits in Michigan.... seems like you just googled the name to find a supporting story.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 19:10:52+00:00): Michigan? This is North Dakota, I had never edited in Michigan
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 19:12:01+00:00): And besides, These sources are from Winnipeg, where I'm from and Grand Forks, where this store was located in
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 19:12:59+00:00): Local news
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 19:13:50+00:00): Grand Forks has a tough financial situation at it's hands
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2022-05-03 19:19:32+00:00): So what now 5 years later after news story airs you decide to make an edit??? this makes zero sense.  What prompted you yesterday to make this edit?  it didn't just randomly pop into your head.. hell you don't even live in the same country as the edit.
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2022-05-03 19:21:12+00:00): and I don't care the financial situation in Grand Folks.. I care about you making map edits in a proper fashion.. you've made a number of edits in ontario that I've had to change, and other people have made changes to your edits as well.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:13:33+00:00): It doesn't exist, that's why
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:14:39+00:00): And to answer your question, everywhere I look, even Bing says it closed
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:17:08+00:00): I'm sorry if the Poi's were off, I just was trying to add thousands of missing businesses from Toronto, and to answer your question, stop lying about a corporate decision, I had nothing to do with the closure.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:18:05+00:00): I visit here every year, that's why, stop blackmailing
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:19:33+00:00): It's a pity you don't understand what's real and what's fake, if I tell you there is no Macy's here anymore, I'm telling you that from the company itself, not from rumours
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:21:39+00:00): https://l.macys.com/nd.html says there is only one Macy's in North Dakota, in Fargo, that settles the question, if the company doesn't even mention this store, then why bother critizing me for updating data.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:23:34+00:00): It doesn't have to do with whether I live in the country or not, what matters is that I could easily drive there in less than 2 hours, and see that the Macy's is closed, even without going and it would still be permanently closed.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:25:43+00:00): Im just telling you how it is, there is no point going on, because if a store is closed even when searching it up, Permanently Closed means just that, I can't visit this store because it isn't even open anymore, since 2017!
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:28:26+00:00): https://m.yelp.ca/search?find_desc=macy%27s&find_loc=Grand+Forks%2C+ND, if I try to search, instead of Macy's it shows men's Warehouse as the closest thing, proving that it doesn't exist, if you can't even search for it, then that tells you something
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:29:44+00:00): https://www.mallscenters.com/brands/stores/macys/grand-forks--north-dakota--columbia-mall-shopping-center mentions it is closed
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:32:20+00:00): https://www.shopcolumbiamall.com/directory/, the malls own website, doesn't even mention Macy's as a tenant
The mall, The company and the internet all say it is closed
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:33:26+00:00): If everywhere you look says it is closed, there is no doubt it is closed, why did I wait this long to change it, Well because I didn't have an account yet
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-03 20:45:38+00:00): So without going you know it is closed?  Ok, sure, but yet you said you visited it originally.

So did you actually visit it in person?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:57:01+00:00): yes, when it was still open, i bought a sodastream machine there
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-02 08:00:45+00:00): which one from that webpage in particular?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:43:31+00:00): Road Network
Select Organization: Statistics Canada
Search for: National Road Network
pitfire (2022-05-02 09:42:48+00:00): Hallo Moonwalker008,
willkommen bei OSM. 
minor corrections / kleinere Dinge hinzugefügt/bearbeitet ist wenig aussagekräftig. Um lokale User besser zu informieren, währe es gut, folgende Info zu beachten.
Jeder Mapper ist dazu aufgerufen, einen aussagekräftigen, nicht automatisch generierten Änderungssatz beim Hochladen seiner Änderungen einzugeben, der die Änderungen beschreibt, denn der Kommentar wird fast überall erscheinen, wo der Änderungssatz aufgelistet wird. Es ist wahrscheinlich, dass andere Mapper diesen Änderungssatzkommentar lesen und verstehen wollen, was du gemacht hast.
Danke und Gruß
Moonwalker008 (2022-05-02 12:29:10+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
In diesem Änderungssatz habe ich die Gebäudeumrisse bearbeitet.
In Zukunft werde ich genauere Änderungssätze schreiben.
Schöne Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-16 17:34:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/471422775/history - it is a pawnshop, right?
user_5359 (2022-05-02 06:38:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved two node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.
See https://www.osm.org/node/6138167479/history, https://www.osm.org/node/8076388920/history
Don't add information double.
taihoku (2022-05-03 17:31:38+00:00): 道路重修已為便道，空照圖尚不能看到。
taihoku (2022-05-03 17:32:11+00:00): 請修正回原本版本
LockOnGuy (2022-05-02 09:54:00+00:00): Renas Azad, Kirkuk as an Arab majority city according to the last census that stated the Arabs are 5 times larger than the Kurds.      
The Kurds was a majority back in the 1950's but not now, here in OSM we go by current data. Also Kirkuk are not in the northern Kurdish region. Stop the Kurdifications of these area near the Kurdish region. And if you want to edit things based on historical matters, this one for you: https://openhistoricalmap.org/
Nawfal85 (2022-05-02 22:47:39+00:00): Renas Azad, you shouldn't change or delete the arabic name for the arabian region.
ZLima12 (2022-05-15 23:36:30+00:00): It appears that this is just a house, and not a business that any customer would visit in person. These types of businesses should not be mapped on OSM. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll remove this from the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120444136
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-05 22:32:44+00:00): You left some unclosed ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056563846
jcr83 (2022-05-02 16:13:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Il ne me semble pas que cette ruine ait un intérêt historique. C'est pourquoi j'avais mis building=ruins et non historic=ruins.
Pokjiun (2022-05-02 20:21:16+00:00): ça marche, je n'avais pas vu le début de l'attribut :3
Lejun (2022-05-05 09:55:22+00:00): Salut, merci pour la contribution où se sont glissées quelques erreurs :

– Tu as placé un nœud sur une ligne en sous-sol en indiquant l’entrée du RER A. Outre le fait que la clé name ne soit pas des plus appropriées, l’information est-elle correcte ?
– À l’Est, des passages cloutés ont été rajoutés à la pelle, et sont certainement une erreur de manipulation que je t’invite également à corriger.
StefanHRT (2022-05-02 07:11:50+00:00): Hallo,
mit dem yes hast Du den Weg "abgewertet" da designated höher "angesehen" ist ;) VG
sjproost (2022-05-02 07:32:00+00:00): Hallo,
das war nicht beabsichtigt. Entschuldige bitte und Danke für den Hinweis.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:45:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:45:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
highflyer74 (2022-05-04 19:19:02+00:00): Moin nochmal!

Du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119614014 vermutlich etwas missverstanden. Das Gebäude soll natürlich bleiben, denn es ist ja vorhanden. Nur die Daten Deiner Unterkunft sollen nicht zweimal erfasst sein. Ich passe es entsprechend an. Schönen Abend Dir!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:44:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
eggie (2022-05-02 08:25:20+00:00): Hi HR..  
Normaly we import buildings from the Dutch Cadastre. We don't draw buidings by ourself. It's all import. 
A request at the forum is always possible. I think an other mapper deleted the building because of the disturbing rendering on the street. 
This item.. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=861631#p861631
Below streetlevel is  layer=1 indeed.
If you don't wish to render the building I tag building:part=yes
It's controversial... mapping for the renderer. :)

I reshaped the building according the BAG data and added a addressnode and BAG data.
I think better merge the sports_centre with the addressnode 1094. The addressnode is just beneath the leisure node sports_centre. 
.. and remove the clubinfo from the building. Thats duplicated info.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-05-02 08:28:48+00:00): A footway underneath or through a building ..
tunnel=building_passage.
If its just partly covered by a building .. covered=yes. (same effect) 
If it's below streetlevel  layer=-1  If it's at streetlevel  no layer.
habitual_revers (2022-05-03 22:14:23+00:00): Bedant for the feedback. Made these changes in changeset #120517941
angys (2022-05-02 17:52:25+00:00): Can you give the source for this input? (image link) If not I will revert your edit
niveditha_polu (2022-05-04 12:40:15+00:00): Thanks for the verification. I've added Jalan Ks 2 based on latest KartaView https://kartaview.org/details/5163561/0/track-info    https://kartaview.org/details/5163865/0/track-info Thanks!
angys (2022-05-04 12:52:19+00:00): Nice, but it should be KS, not Ks, it is an acronym of “Kulim Square”, tq
niveditha_polu (2022-05-05 06:42:27+00:00): Noted and we've corrected the acronym. Thanks once again
marczoutendijk (2022-05-03 18:45:36+00:00): This changeset is considered vandalism and hence deleted by the DWG.
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-05-03 18:49:39+00:00): Using wrong changeset comments is also considered bad practice!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-05-03 18:51:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120511920 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
TravGW (2022-05-12 01:05:57+00:00): Is there truly a cycleway here?
Diacritic (2022-05-17 21:51:05+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for your contribution.

This edit changed a service road into a fence, which doesn't appear to be correct. I've resolved it now.
Hb- (2022-06-20 11:48:03+00:00): Zur Adresse Linderter Straße 46, Springe siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122619582
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-03 20:56:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120516188 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed renaming of Persian/Arabian Gulf, please discuss on talk list before touching this.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-03 20:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120516188 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed renaming of Persian/Arabian Gulf, please discuss on talk list before touching this.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-03 20:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120516188 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed renaming of Persian/Arabian Gulf, please discuss on talk list before touching this.
LockOnGuy (2022-05-02 11:05:53+00:00): Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120451289
ali 1375 (2022-05-03 14:21:31+00:00): hi.
way/652668509 is maritime boundary of Iran. more info in my comment in openstreetmap.org/changeset/120451289
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-03 20:56:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120516188 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed renaming of Persian/Arabian Gulf, please discuss on talk list before touching this.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-03 20:56:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120516188 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed renaming of Persian/Arabian Gulf, please discuss on talk list before touching this.
dpolovinkin (2023-08-25 13:54:42+00:00): hi, noticed that you added missing addresses for some buildings which in fact have address POI already, and hence they are duplicated and standing on the same spot, was it done mechanically without checking?

Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4759235516#map=19/45.63754/25.57995 (6 years ago)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4759247829 (you, 1 year ago)

I will remove duplicated addresses, hope thats okay for you?
Wulf4096 (2022-06-26 09:27:14+00:00): https://osm.wulf.eu.org/maurien/
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-05 22:12:54+00:00): "Private" is not a name
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:45:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
MatthieuMartin (2022-08-05 12:10:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Les passages piétons existaient déjà au carrefour Boulevard des Allobroges / Rue du Faubourg Saint-Nicolas.

Vu que ce sont des passages piétons avec feux piétons ils ont une icônes avec deux petits feux. D'où je pense la confusion.

Bonne carto!
MatthieuMartin (2022-09-28 23:03:52+00:00): Corrigé : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126758070
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:45:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-05 22:14:16+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset comments