piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
drlellinger (2018-08-07 10:51:40+00:00): Wenns danach ginge kann man alles außer Alpengipfel löschen, aber es ist nun mal Fakt dass es auch Hügelgipfel gibt, es sind nun mal die Höchsten Punkte weit und breit, je nach dem wie man weit und breit definiert. Das Bayrische Landesamt für Vermessung gibt diesen Hügelgipfeln die Bedeutung, ich übertrage sie nur.
LeifRasmussen (2018-08-06 22:36:59+00:00): Nice first additions to OpenStreetMap!  The number of levels in buildings can be very useful for software such as F4Map for displaying building heights.  http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=35.9457920&lon=-79.0473972&zoom=18&camera.theta=48.201
Good luck with any further mapping!
Leif Rasmussen
user_5359 (2018-08-06 17:11:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your object please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddojo
Mark Arnott (2018-08-06 21:47:54+00:00): Hi, user_5359 and thanks. I changed the description to martial arts studio (and I think updated it properly). The word dojo actually translates directly at 'the place of the way,' as in aikido is 'the gentle way.' In American English dojo means any martial arts studio, or any place that becomes that by its usage. A gym could, for the several hours of its use, become a dojo. Arnott Kenpo Karate is a dojo, but that's a fairly highfalutin' word so I went with studio.
user_5359 (2018-08-06 17:07:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
Thomas8122 (2018-08-06 16:56:16+00:00): Korrektur: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1474626
viloan (2018-08-06 16:59:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DaveF (2018-08-07 13:07:24+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8506033/history

Are you adding historic county boundaries from new or updating existing?
smb1001 (2018-08-07 14:37:38+00:00): Hi,
I've been adding them from new as none exist at present. The result of my work thus far is 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ARB
Given it's a manual job, I have to frequently go back and "correct" sections I missed or the like, but although I frequently add the relation to existing boundary ways, I of course never edit the nodes of the way itself.
DaveF (2018-08-07 14:56:32+00:00): Hi
Where are you obtaining your historic data?

From the historic wiki page
"historic objects should not be mapped as it is outside of scope of OSM"

Boundaries are amended regularly. What is the date of your 'historic' additions. How far back in time are you planning to go?
smb1001 (2018-08-07 16:12:13+00:00): In this case they are not 'historic' but current. (Now with governmental backing also: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/by-george-englands-traditional-counties-can-return-to-englands-roads )  They represent the immutable divisions of England from Saxon times until the boundary acts of the 1880s, and so the 'date' of those I'm adding is "all dates prior to the administrative adjustments that began around then". I've thus been using early-edition OS maps.

I agree historic mapping is indeed out of scope, but England's "historic counties" don't fall into that. To quote a (21st-century) map that I own, "our geographic counties have never been affected, nor their boundaries changed by the endless shifting of local government boundaries over the past 125 years, but have remained constant and are today as they have been for centuries."
DaveF (2018-08-07 17:30:53+00:00): I'm struggling to comprehend 'historic' as "current".

TBH, I see your comments as self defeating. If they're "immutable" & "unaffected" over time, how come you're adding ways?

As this is a country wide endeavour has it been discussed on Talk-GB?

Which versions of OS maps? Are they on the NSL site?
DaveF (2018-08-07 18:11:17+00:00): Note: You are incorrectly add identical tags to both ways & relations. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613388972
woodpeck (2018-08-07 21:58:54+00:00): Historic boundaries should be added to a suitable project e.g. openhistoricalmap, not OSM. Boundaries are problematic in OSM in every case since they are rarely observable; the only reason we have county boundaries at all is that their usefulness (not least to mappers) outweighs their lack of observability. The boundaries added here are even *less* observable on the ground, and don't have any of the "usefulness" reasons going for them. I agree it's an interesting topic but we can't add historic data like that to OSM. It should be removed again.
smb1001 (2018-08-09 09:04:53+00:00): (Re: adding tags to both ways and relations) Are you talking about the boundary=historic on the way? -- every admin boundary has boundary=administrative in both the way and relation. I'm fine to leave those off the way, but isn't the standard to put an indicative tag on the way so potlatch, etc make it clear what it is?
user_5359 (2018-08-06 18:11:53+00:00): Hello! Please don’t forget to connect the footpath with the crossing highways.
Wetteborn (2018-08-06 18:14:50+00:00): That that include footpaths that don't actually connect with highways but go underneath them?
user_5359 (2018-08-06 18:35:45+00:00): I have mainly looked at the ways around the area of http://www.osm.org/way/614527525. You are right for the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614527545 (the motorway has a bridge tag) but not for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614527546
Wetteborn (2018-08-06 19:42:36+00:00): Oh good catch. I'm still working on the area but I'll make sure moving forward to have them connected. And try to correct ones that aren't.
viloan (2018-08-06 17:08:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
marc__marc (2020-02-24 22:17:42+00:00): Hello,
it this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5812982238 a duplicadte of this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5812982238 or it's 2 area inside one bigger one ?
Regards,
Marc
Frans S (2018-08-12 13:49:02+00:00): Hi,   after reviewing this task we found a lot of unsquared buildings. Please square each building with the S key  (only rectangular buildings.) We have a lot repair work on badly mapped buildings.
Thank you
Frans S (2018-08-08 06:09:01+00:00): Hi, Thank you for mapping.  Please square all your rectangular buildings. On the total mapped buildings it is not so much, but keep an eye on it.  
Best regards
viloan (2018-08-06 18:23:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Hernan (2018-08-07 12:26:32+00:00): OSM no es un lugar para realizar publicidad, se cargan datos de objetos que existen en la realidad. Si quieren cargar su empresa, pueden hacerlo con las etiquetas correspondientes, no cambiando el nombre a una calle completa. Por favor lean la documentación y ayudas antes de seguir editando. Los cambios debieron ser revertidos.
jnapoli18 (2018-08-07 12:34:51+00:00): Hernan, mil disculpas. No pensé que cambiaba el nombre de la calle. Pensé que estaba modificando el nombre del punto que había remarcado en el mapa.
Hernan (2018-08-07 12:42:24+00:00): No hay problema, ultimamente tuvimos varios casos de vandalismo, y por eso el mensaje tan cortante. Mira en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:P%C3%A1gina_principal donde tenes unas guias muy completas sobre como empezar a mapear. Saludos Hernan
jnapoli18 (2018-08-07 13:07:05+00:00): No hay problema, comprendo. Revisaré la guía. Saludos!
viloan (2018-08-06 18:35:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-08-06 20:05:30+00:00): sidewalk=left, right, both kan wel. Dit klopt zo niet als er een wandelpad naast loopt.
eggie (2018-08-06 20:06:32+00:00): Het is immers een fietspad met een aanliggen wandelpad. Graag concreet aangeven wat je aan het doen bent. Niemand begrijpt je commentaar.
eggie (2018-08-06 20:07:05+00:00): Kruisende wegen altijd een verbinding geven met elkaar door een node. Graag reactie
Freek_ (2018-08-07 13:14:33+00:00): Bij het valideren door JOSM kreeg ik een melding over dat fietspad. Ik had daar zelf niks aangedaan maar waarschijnlijk doordat ik er eerst wel een node op had gelegd ging de checker er nog een keer naar kijken. (?)
Weg 198772763 nu op sidewalk=both gezet. Node had jij al toegevoegd toch? Zo goed dan?
eggie (2018-08-06 20:01:47+00:00): Dag Freek. Je voetpad heft geen verbinding met dat fietspad op twee plaatsen. Repareer je dat zelf.
eggie (2018-08-06 21:49:59+00:00): verbindingsnode aangebracht
user_5359 (2018-08-06 20:18:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please do not add a building a second time just to add the name ("SERT building"). I have corrected that.
aceman444 (2020-05-11 17:21:13+00:00): Hi, there is no amenity=camp. What did you mean at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591582019 ? Is it tourism=camp_site?
itineris (2020-05-11 17:35:21+00:00): Hi,
It was by mistake, since this camp site is no longer in operation. I've fixed it.
aceman444 (2020-05-11 17:37:10+00:00): Thanks.
daft35 (2018-08-08 13:48:57+00:00): Дорога закрыта, заборы с обеих сторон
maxolasersquad (2018-10-18 14:12:11+00:00): There is no castle located here. It's also not appropriate to list people's individual's houses with their name attached to it.
Alexey Klyanin (2018-08-06 19:08:21+00:00): Норм
user_5359 (2018-08-07 13:54:23+00:00): Hello! Short question on the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113330079 : What is the meaning of the key "disued_building" (correct writing will be disused:building). Exists the building? Did you know the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix ?
Truchin (2018-08-07 14:10:06+00:00): Comme le bâtiment en question n'existe plus mais que l'imagerie aérienne n'est pas à jour, j'ai conservé l'ancienne emprise du bâtiment mais le tag n'est probablement pas le bon.
L'objectif est simplement d'éviter qu'un contributeur l'ajoute sur la base d'imagerie Bing ou autre alors qu'il est détruit.

Thomas
user_5359 (2018-08-07 14:14:55+00:00): Je recommande le préfixe "abandoned:" ou "demolished:" et une note avec la clé "note".
I recommend the prefix "abandoned:building" or "demolished:building" and a note with the key "note".
eggie (2019-10-22 15:02:35+00:00): Het is niet de bedoeling om prive gegevens van je verblijf in OSM toe te voegen. Al je edits komen daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart. 
Dus waar je auto staat of waar de tent staat hoeft niet op de kaart. 
Ik verwijder je bijdrage.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-10-22 15:04:31+00:00): reverted by changeset #76056051
viloan (2018-08-06 19:33:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Baloo Uriza (2018-08-08 02:49:11+00:00): JOSM can help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61413651
user_5359 (2018-08-06 20:12:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5590988474/history ! A tree inside of the building ?
lifetranscends (2018-08-06 20:32:15+00:00): Tree location has been fixed.
TheSolarGuy (2018-08-29 17:49:32+00:00): Why are you not importing the much more exact (official) Lantmäteriet data?
luiswoo (2018-08-06 21:42:54+00:00): Смысла нет его добавлять к нп(всё в вики: Useful combination

    boundary=administrative — а гранцу не совмещают с полигоном place), проблема (очень вероятно) была в addr:city, его я сейчас с эти нп счистил.
viloan (2018-08-06 20:05:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GerdP (2018-10-03 09:44:53+00:00): Moin! Mir sind die beiden Wege mit highway=street_lamp aufgefallen. Normalerweise wird dafür ein einzelner Knoten verwendet. Was ist hier besonders?
Supaplex030 (2018-10-03 14:09:25+00:00): Hallo Gerd, ja, bei diesen Lampen wusste ich auch nicht wie ich sie am besten taggen soll - am Ende habe ich mich für diese Variante entschieden. Es handelt sich dabei um Bögen, die jeweils rechts und links der Straße im Boden verankert sind; das Licht hängt oben in der Mitte im Bogen. Alternative wäre aus meiner Sicht entweder ein Node in der Straßenmitte oder evtl. zwei Nodes jeweils am Punkt der Bodenverankerung, aber die finde ich beide noch irreführender als diese Lösung als Linie...
GerdP (2018-10-04 05:37:15+00:00): OK, da bin ich auch überfragt. Vielleicht hängst Du noch ein description tag dran mit einer kurzen Beschreibung dieses Umstandes.
eggie (2018-08-06 21:15:50+00:00): Beste Freek.. Andere mappers snappen niet wat je edits inhouden gezien je commentaar. Graag concreet wat je wijzigt of toevoegt.
Freek_ (2018-08-07 13:17:25+00:00): Glasbak toegevoegd. Bij valideren kreeg ik een foutmelding van JOSM over de tag die ik over had genomen van een glasbak die er al was. 
Toen de glasbakken in de rest van Houten nagelopen.
recycling_type=container
recycling:glass_bottles=yes
eggie (2018-08-07 13:35:06+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk. Je gebruikt wel gelijk de beste editor. 
Soms negeer is ok wel eens een fout als ik het niet precies weet wat in zo'n container gaat.
Your Village Maps (2018-09-16 02:08:56+00:00): Hi, Alaska Dave.  I suppose you could call me Colorado Dave. :)  

I am questioning this one-way cycle path along NE-bound AK 1.  I can find no evidence that there is a separate path along the highway, and certainly not one-way.  I see that bicycles are allowed on the shoulders, including AK-3, as far as Trunk Road, I believe, and then bikers must use a separate path.  So, what's the story with this?  Should be interesting.  I know the imagery is not current, not even the Esri.
AlaskaDave (2018-09-16 07:54:04+00:00): Hi,
All I did was remove the name=Glenn Highway from the cycleway, it was plainly not correct. The original mapper was Jason Rowland and his edits had to do with making the path visible in an app he favors., See 
Changeset: 61136373
Added cycle route along AK-1 to allow use of Kamoot. Kamoot does not allow cycle route to align with motorways - there are no other routes in this case, making Kamoot unusable in this region w/o a designated cycle path.

Be well...
kukułka (2018-08-07 09:45:30+00:00): Żuraw to ikona Gdańska. Niektórzy jadą do Gdańska zobaczyć morze, Żurawia i Neptuna na Długim Targu. Czy  sądzisz, że to dobrze usuwać z Żurawia klucz tourism=attraction?
freebeer (2019-08-13 08:06:02+00:00): aha!  hello,

i see you also use potlatch, to explain how something like this has happened.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446168142/history has changed here from surface=asphalt, to v=asphalt, where i found it today.

i want to check these and similar changes are an error i now understand, and are not deliberate damage rather than removal.  i would normally fix these quietly, but i have discovered several such corrections that have been DWG reverted.

gracias.  viva la potlatch!  (especially potlatch 1 i have been using for these repairs :-)
user_5359 (2018-08-07 13:45:40+00:00): Hello! Short comment to the node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5036950270 and the tag currency:visa=yes : visa isn't a currency, visa is a payment method. Can you please check this?
atcomapper (2018-08-07 07:33:46+00:00): Er navnet "Den lille sø" et officielt navn for søen? Hvad er kilden for dette navn? (f.eks. et skilt, en hjemmeside etc.)?
user_5359 (2018-08-07 04:43:40+00:00): Hello! See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/611344132 : Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
imnichol (2018-08-07 23:09:54+00:00): I noticed that - that's behavior inherent in the app StreetComplete, and I don't know how to submit a bug to the developer.
Hjart (2018-08-06 21:42:34+00:00): Er du sikker på at det er et "militært" træningsområde?
Fedteroev (2018-08-06 22:13:48+00:00): Nej, min fejl. Udendørs gym.
viloan (2018-08-06 21:32:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
hu9o (2018-08-07 03:24:19+00:00): Salut, pour info, « contact:facebook » est plus utilisé, mais « facebook » fonctionne aussi 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook
Benny Goodman (2018-10-13 00:34:00+00:00): You've changed rail segments into "abandoned" but failed to fix them in the relations. This is bad work.
micha_k (2018-10-13 00:41:16+00:00): Thank you for beeing so nice and charming. If you have any knowledge on the current assignment of tracks to the different operators and subdivisions, feel free to adjust the relations. I don't have this knowledge. The track layout was sometimes changed radically, so the assignment is not obvious.
GOwin (2018-09-11 13:04:47+00:00): @josephpada. You need to validate these, the buildings are not squared, and you are tracing the zigzag edge of the roof, instead of drawing straight edges.

http://imgur.com/kwli0Ayl.png
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61417081
GOwin (2018-09-11 13:04:53+00:00): @josephpada. You need to validate these, the buildings are not squared, and you are tracing the zigzag edge of the roof, instead of drawing straight edges.

http://imgur.com/kwli0Ayl.png
eggie (2018-08-07 05:52:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Markus366 (2018-08-06 22:38:19+00:00): Hallo, warum ist denn aus Kindergarten plötzlich childcare geworden? 

Auch hier nochmal die dringende Bitte um sinnvolle Änderungs Kommentare.

Markus
bison166 (2018-08-07 08:39:11+00:00): Hallo sannsynligvis,
du mappst roof:shape=many
Was soll das sein ?
Wo kommt das her ?
3D Mapping soll das wohl nicht werden.