piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:20:08+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:20:19+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:21:14+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:21:35+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:21:45+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:21:56+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:22:07+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
NieWnen (2019-07-27 23:38:46+00:00): Na Przejazdowej nie powinien być po całości CPR? Znaków pionowych co prawda brakuje w kliku miejscach, ale na większości przecięć z ulicami są malowania jak na CPR/DDR.
adamsc (2019-07-28 20:12:03+00:00): Ostatnio jechałem tym odcinkiem i do cmentarza w obie strony oznakowania pionowego CPR nie widziałem, została część przejazdów dla rowerów, ale one też nie są zbyt wyraźne. Tam gdzie zostawiłem na mapie CPR oznakowanie jest prawidłowe i widoczne.
NieWnen (2020-09-10 21:06:48+00:00): Miałem okazję się dzisiaj tamtędy przejechać i znalazłem znak odnośnie ciągłości CPRa na Przejazdowej, był on nieco schowany bo jeszcze na ul. Bryły.

https://imgur.com/a/kgXX2zn – niestety nie z tej strony co trzeba (nie nagrało się), ale lokalizacja znaku zachowana.

Zmieniłem na CPR oraz poprawiłem przejście (dla pieszych i rowerzystów) (90722655).
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:22:38+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:23:12+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
mappas (2019-08-22 12:14:35+00:00): Αυτό αφορά τον ιστό με το κόκκινο φως; Εαν ναι, δεν έχει όνομα "φαρος". "Φάρος" λέγεται η αίθουσα στον 8ο όροφο, η οποία δεν μπορεί να χαρτογραφηθεί εάν δεν κάνουμε 3D όλο το κτίριο.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:23:23+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-25 18:23:44+00:00): #test #failed ?

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your edits?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:27:49+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
tomhukins (2019-08-08 12:08:49+00:00): Hi, thank you for improving OpenStreetMap.

There's nothing wrong with your edit, but I hope you don't mind me making a couple of suggestions:

The original driveway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506516077 has "access=private" set on it, but your extension at doesn't.  I suspect both should have the same access restrictions.

Also, instead of creating a new way for the extension, you could have added new nodes to the existing way (or combined them both into one).

Again, thank you for improving the map.
girinj (2019-08-09 07:11:01+00:00): Hi tomhukins,
 
Thanks for looking into my edit. I am in alignment with your suggestion and have changes the access tag as private. I have made a note of your suggestion and will use it in my future edits. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion. Always happy to learn from community.
 
Regards
girinj
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:24:36+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:24:57+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:25:11+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:25:30+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
gscholz (2019-07-27 05:50:09+00:00): Hi,
thsi changeset has created errors in the osm database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-61.56057&lat=-1.00546&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:01:22+00:00): UKR: added destination=Тернопіль;destination:ref=M-12;destination:int_ref=E 50
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:26:36+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:27:09+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 07:28:53+00:00): UKR: added destination=Харкiв;added destination:ref=M-18
freeExec (2019-07-30 06:08:03+00:00): Улица на доме, должна быть такой же как и на дороге, т.е. со словом "улица такая-то"
downwarddog (2019-07-30 02:14:13+00:00): Why do you think this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614639126) should be primary? The southbound section of the road is secondary, so the northbound section should also be secondary.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:27:40+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:28:17+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
mueschel (2019-07-28 09:12:56+00:00): This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.
Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.

Thanks
Jan
richlv (2019-08-05 19:20:56+00:00): Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.
MikeN (2019-07-26 12:20:25+00:00): Hi, great job mapping Geneseo!   Hint - for square buildings like Leaman's , use the Q key with the building selected to make square corners.
pantufla (2023-03-30 12:13:05+00:00): Te quedó bonito el río :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9837922/history#map=16/8.8440/-69.9834
user_5359 (2019-07-25 16:08:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move the shop node from highway to the buildings.
richlv (2019-08-05 19:20:01+00:00): Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-25 18:24:15+00:00): #test #failed ?

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your edits?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
user_5359 (2019-07-26 20:45:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add some ways with the key "Highway" (misspelling of "highway"). I coorect this error, but it seems you paint your ways over existing ways. Please check this.
mueschel (2019-07-28 09:12:45+00:00): This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.
Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.

Thanks
Jan
obeiseyene (2019-07-29 10:44:04+00:00): Merci pour ces remarques.On en tiendra compte dans nos prochaines contributions.Je ne suis pas encore très huilé.
richlv (2019-08-05 19:12:18+00:00): Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:28:38+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-25 18:24:40+00:00): #test #failed ?

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your edits?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-27 05:10:32+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73777558
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:28:58+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
mueschel (2019-07-28 09:12:05+00:00): This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.
Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.

Thanks
Jan
richlv (2019-08-05 19:16:07+00:00): Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-25 18:24:51+00:00): #test #failed ?

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your edits?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:29:07+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
mueschel (2019-07-28 09:13:08+00:00): This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.
Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.

Thanks
Jan
richlv (2019-08-05 19:06:24+00:00): Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.
mueschel (2019-07-28 09:13:27+00:00): This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.
Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.

Thanks
Jan
richlv (2019-08-05 19:07:13+00:00): Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:29:58+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:30:09+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Supaplex (2019-08-09 17:25:15+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mueschel (2019-07-28 09:13:35+00:00): This changeset created a huge number of issues regarding added streets that were already present in OSM as well as other problems like tagging or overlapping objects.
Please be so kind and review all the changes using the validation tool in your editor.

Thanks
Jan
richlv (2019-08-05 18:56:27+00:00): Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:30:26+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
abakus_uploader (2019-07-25 22:30:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2019-07-25 13:03:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
4004 (2019-07-27 21:33:52+00:00): сожалею, но ваши старания напрасны - карта в покемон-го/майнкрафт/ингрессе основана на данных 2015-17 годов, и вряд ли когда либо обновится
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 07:52:32+00:00): UKR: added destination=Kиїв;destination:ref=M-05;destination:int_ref:backward=E 95;destination:backward=Kиїв;destination:forward=Ставище;Володарка;Житомир;destination:ref:forward=P-18;destination:ref:backward=M-05;oneway=no
eggie (2019-07-25 14:31:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:33:21+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
literan (2019-07-25 17:08:07+00:00): не совсем понимаю, что за ряды деревьев? я хорошо знаю этот район, и там просто насаждения, без каких-то рядов или линий. Можно и на панорамах посмотреть.
Vascom (2019-07-25 17:10:09+00:00): А как их ещё обозначать? Полигоном лес?
literan (2019-07-25 17:12:00+00:00): конечно. natural=wood. И еще, по поводу этого объекта https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514760964/history . power=generator это тег непосредственно для турбины или котла, т.е. того, что генерирует энергию (в виде элктричества, пара и т.п.). Для котельной (если это она) каорректный тег power=plant. Но маловата она для котельной... это точно не тепловой пункт?
literan (2019-07-25 17:13:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:power=generator?uselang=ru вот же в вики описано.
Vascom (2019-07-25 17:34:51+00:00): Там была котельная 100%. Не знаю действует она сейчас или нет.
В вики написано, что power=plant ставится на полигон территории котельной, и на само здание ставится power=generator, с указанием генерируемого.
Vascom (2019-07-25 17:37:47+00:00): Вот эта вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C#.D0.9A.D0.BE.D1.82.D0.B5.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.8F
literan (2019-07-25 17:45:47+00:00): Понятно.... написано неаккуратно. Все же основными являются страницы самих тегов (а эту надо будет подправить). Если не доверяешь моему мнению - можем вместе в чате у fr1 спросить, он на энергоинфраструктуре специализируется ))
ValenMass (2019-07-25 13:59:57+00:00): #salesforceie
downwarddog (2019-07-30 02:15:06+00:00): On this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206009240) you changed ref from N1 to 1.005 although 1.005 is already stored in ref:city. Is this not part of the N1 highway?
user_3022894 (2019-09-01 11:01:16+00:00): Hi stadt-wuppertal-st,
vielen Dank für Ihre Änderung. Wenn es sich bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495556382 tatsächlich um einen gemeinsamen Geh- und Radweg handelt (wovon auch ich stark ausgehe), dann steht ungefähr an dieser Stelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5600832559 aber ein falsches Verkehrszeichen. Es ist das Zeichen 237 (reiner benutzungspflichtiger Radweg). Schön zu sehen auch auf Mapillary und es steht dort immer noch. Ich vermute jedoch selbst stark, dass in dem Zeichen schlicht die Fußgänger fehlen. Müsste das Verkehrsschild dann gegen das Zeichen 240 ausgetauscht werden? Vielleicht gibt es bei der Stadt Wuppertal Ansprechpartner für so etwas, dem ich/man dies mitteilen könnte? Über eine Rückmeldung würde ich mich sehr freuen.
Viele Grüße, Lukas
stadt-wuppertal_st (2019-09-02 06:29:51+00:00): Hallo Lukas,
Vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Es handelt sich hier definitiv um einen gemeinsamen Fuß- und Radweg.
Hast du das Schild selbst gesehen? Nach meinen Recherchen bzw. unsere aktuellen Orthofotos zeigen auf der ganzen Strecke dort 240 Schilder. Auch an der Stelle, die du markiert hast. Einzig bei der Einfahrt zur Tankstelle, meine ich, steht ein einzelnes Hinweisschild für Autofahrer, dass Fahrräder die Fahrbahn kreuzen können.
Ich werde mir aber heute Nachmittag noch einmal selbst die Lage vor Ort anschauen.
Viele Grüße, Sarah
user_3022894 (2019-09-02 06:54:13+00:00): Hi Sarah, das ist doch super. Solch eine Kooperation gefällt mir! Das, was du zu den Schildern sagst, stimmt soweit und bei der Tankstelle halte ich das sowiet eig. auch für richtig, ja. Nur an der besagten Ecke Clausewitzstraße/Jesinghauser Straße an der Ampel steht meines Wissens nach definitiv Zeichen 237. Am 30.08.2019 habe ich es noch gesehen. Wie du sagst, dürfte das jedoch das einzige Schild sein, dass sich "verirrt" hat. Sonst steht wirklich überall Zeichen 240. Viele Grüße, Lukas
stadt-wuppertal_st (2019-09-03 09:06:53+00:00): Hi Lukas,
Gestern hat sich eine Kollegin nochmal ein Bild vor Ort gemacht. Du hast völlig recht! Unsere Luftbilder sind von 2018, da wurde wohl das Schild innerhalb eines Jahres ausgetauscht.
Wo man sowas meldet, müsste ich aber auch erst recherchieren..
Viele Grüße
user_3022894 (2019-09-03 15:07:41+00:00): Hi, alles klar. Dazu fällt mir ein, dass ich wegen einer ganz anderen Sache mich da mal, Anfang 2019, an das Team "Verkehrslenkung" der Stadt gewandt habe. Allerdings scheinen sie dort aktuell viel zu tun zu haben, denn ich erhielt eine E-Mail, dass es bis zur Bearbeitung weniger dringender Anliegen dauern kann. Aber gut, man hätte zumindest einen Ansprechpartner. Oder man merkt sich das für später. Viele Grüße, Lukas
user_3022894 (2019-10-11 12:51:21+00:00): Es gibt eine gute Nachricht. Ich sah heute, dass das Schild mittlerweile zum korrekten Zeichen 240 hin ausgewechselt wurde. Vielen Dank noch mal an alle Beteiligten und viele Grüße, Lukas
stadt-wuppertal_st (2019-10-11 12:59:58+00:00): Hi,
Ich hatte die Verkehrslenkung über das Schild informiert. Das freut mich, dass es so schnell geklappt hat.
LG
ValenMass (2019-07-25 13:58:56+00:00): #salesforceie
richlv (2019-08-05 19:17:32+00:00): Unfortunately, we had to revert this changeset as it had too many data quality problems.
Please don't be discouraged from further contributions, but do discuss the process with whoever is organising this activity.
ValenMass (2019-07-25 14:00:37+00:00): #salesforceie
abrensch (2019-07-28 12:21:30+00:00): Hallo Ralf,

diesen Edit hier kann ich nicht nachvollziehen.

Da ist jetzt ein Loch in der K4, wo vorher keins war, aber den Zusammenhang zum CS-Kommentar sehe ich nicht.
stadt-bocholt-ralf-goeppert (2019-07-29 08:42:37+00:00): Hallo Abresch,

da ist mir die Änderung leider mißlungen. Sollte natürlich kein Loch rein. Können Sie das rückgängig machen? Was ich lediglich machen wollte ist auf Bocholter Stadtgebiet den Straßennamen in Barloer Ringstraße ändern.
Der Kommentar ist wohl leider von einer anderen Änderung.

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.

Ralf Göppert
abrensch (2019-07-29 08:51:16+00:00): ich habe den Aenderungssatz zurueckgesetzt

Gruss, Arndt
mueschel (2019-07-28 08:39:52+00:00): I reverted this changeset because it added hundreds of objects overlapping with already mapped objects. Please don't upload any data without checking for existing objects before.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:14:15+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
viloan (2019-07-25 14:22:50+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Tomas Straupis (2019-07-25 16:08:15+00:00): OpenStreetMap - tai visiems matomas žemėlapis (būtent jį naudoja KGB aplikacija CRAP.ME), taigi nereikėtų į jį įkelti savo išminties per CRAP.ME programą.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:29:15+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32