piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dodko (2022-09-16 21:47:21+00:00): Keď existuje adresa v budove
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73352516
Tak sa už nedáva duplicitne aj do bodu nad budvou https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9980631292, aplikácie si adresu majú prebrať z budovy.
user_5359 (2022-08-27 15:09:52+00:00): Hello! Please use building:colour instead buiding:colour. Please check your input for duplicate nodes and lines.
Nawfal85 (2022-09-11 13:41:54+00:00): Thank you for your interest and advice
emersonveenstra (2022-08-27 01:09:57+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contributions. One error i see is the lane counts for the oneway sections are now wrong. You should remove the lanes:backward, :both_ways, and :forward and then change the lane count to the correct number for that section of road

I think this is supposed to be marked as private? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089561921

Also, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089561924 shouldn't be oneway because it prevents southbound drivers from turning left onto Mark Putnam.
wireguy (2022-08-27 01:49:33+00:00): Jeff, welcome to osm!   'testing'?  this is a live database, not a test.   Everything doesn't need a name.  see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

clean up, keep mapping!
Allison P (2022-08-27 04:48:58+00:00): There are unique tags (and presets) for many of the features here. It isn't correct to tag them as things like grassland.

Ditto for trees, which should not be tagged as woods unto themselves. natural=tree does what you're after.

Not sure what is meant by natural=golf. And there is a tag for golf cartpaths. Bare rock is for natural features only. Try to map as just a line. You can map the area if you like but that requires a more advanced tagging scheme

If you are not sure of the proper way to enter data, leave a note. Better to have missing data than misleading data.
JeffBobW (2022-08-27 11:43:36+00:00): I have removed these features until I learn the best way to add them. Thank you
zorglubu (2022-08-27 08:22:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vos contributions.
OSM étant un outil collaboratif, pourriez-vous penser à ajouter un commentaire dans les groupes de modifications, afin de décrire ce que cela concerne (ex: ajout piscine) ?
Cela facilite la collaboration :-)
Merci. Et bonne continuation !
user_5359 (2022-08-31 15:30:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9980765044. What is the meaning of the tag PARCEL_ID = 00498000100700? If this is a internal reference number (which data source and license?) please use a key starting with ref:.
Adam Franco (2023-02-22 02:35:10+00:00): This seems like a pretty short section of limited-access to classify as a motorway. Maybe maintaining highway=trunk + expressway=yes would better capture the situation.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:22:28+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9980753595/history
gscholz (2022-09-04 05:36:24+00:00): Hi
this changeset cause errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=2.33242&lat=15.88273&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125426748

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Kind regards
Guido
Futur3r (2022-08-26 23:59:20+00:00): Oups,
commentaire de changeset :
Corrections diverses et ajout de tag photomapping mapillary
AgusQui (2022-08-30 22:21:38+00:00): Por favor no poner los nombres todo en MAYUSCULAS.
snopas24 (2022-08-27 01:30:50+00:00): *University Park, whose namesake is Portland University
ikopanjirukmana (2022-08-29 03:24:24+00:00): Hi,
you just add highway=footway, however from imagery (Bing), it appears to be a river because there is an existing road with the tag bridge in the top left.  Please tell me, where did you get this highway?
thanks
gpserror (2022-09-02 17:35:40+00:00): hey, thanks for edits.  However just wanted to let you know the roundabout you added may be turning in the wrong direction, we should be driving on the right side of the road and make a right when entering a roundabout, and going around counterclockwise.  I'd be surprised if this is not the case here but just wanted to let you know.
brickbird (2022-08-27 04:27:07+00:00): こんにちは。この変更セットで行われた以下のタグ変更は、日本OpenStreetMapコミュニティの合意に反するものです。
Hello. The following tag changes in this changeset violate the agreement of the Japanese OpenStreetMap community.
payment:au_pay → payment:au_PAY
payment:d_barai → payment:d払い
payment:edy → payment:Edy
payment:id → payment:iD
payment:paypay → payment:PayPay
payment:quicpay → payment:QUICPay
payment:rakuten_pay → payment:楽天Pay
payment:waon → payment:WAON

payment:○○キーについて2022年6月から7月に議論が行われました。payment:○○における○○はアルファベット小文字にするべきとの方針のもと、以下のキーが合意されました。
Regarding payment:○○ keys, the discussion took place from June to July 2022. Under the policy that ○○ of payment:○○ should be lower-case alphabetic characters, the following keys were agreed.
payment:au_pay
payment:d_barai
payment:edy
payment:id
payment:line_pay
payment:merpay
payment:nanaco
payment:paypay
payment:quicpay
payment:rakuten_pay
payment:waon

議論の内容や合意過程については下記をご参照ください。
Please refer to the followings for the content of the discussion and the agreement process.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA_talk:Key:payment
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:payment
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2022-July/date.html

この合意に基づき英語版WikiのKey:paymentページにも記載を加えています。
Based on this agreement, I have added descriptions to the Key:payment page of the English Wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment#Digital_wallets

ご意見がある場合はタグを変更する前に下記でご意見を述べてください。よろしくお願いします。
If you have any opinions, please express your opinions in the following page before changing tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA_talk:Key:payment
Palolo (2022-08-27 16:46:45+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to mapping Samoa. Please use Maxar imagery as it tends to be more up to date. Also please use the q key to make square corners on buildings. Thank you
i2004 (2022-08-27 20:16:25+00:00): cuales fueron los cambios
i2004 (2022-08-27 20:16:36+00:00): que hiciste
AgusQui (2022-08-29 14:47:57+00:00): Estaban las paradas desordenadas, faltaban roles, alguna que otra parada le faltaba el stop_position y otros errores por el estilo
Diacritic (2022-08-27 11:13:28+00:00): Hello,

This edit is incorrect.

As per official sources, this road segment is Old Princes Highway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125428956
Mashin (2022-08-27 10:32:36+00:00): But since there is a roof over the road and it has walls on both sides
(https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=41.18316~-73.179619&lvl=17&dir=288.259&style=x&v=2&sV=1) shouldn't there be tunnel=building_passage? If there are no walls then covered=yes seems like appropriate to me though.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-27 17:48:44+00:00): Hm yeah, that particular example is definitely borderline. I've added a section to the building_passage discussion page for roofs between buildings. Car washes are also borderline, I've been leaving them as building_passage but arguably they should only have indoor=yes
nevw (2022-08-27 09:56:50+00:00): Hi
I noticed this is picked up on osmi-areas
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.01465&lat=-27.45380&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
nevw (2022-08-27 10:00:34+00:00): the above link doesn't work for me so here is another try...zoom in to the blue dot.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.27881&lat=-26.95733&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik+Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
nevw (2022-08-27 10:04:05+00:00): ?? try this one...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.01458&lat=-27.45593&zoom=16
_justanotherguy_ (2022-08-28 22:52:25+00:00): Hey! Much appreciated for reaching out. I believe that's coming up because part of the multipolygon I used for the roof relation runs along itself where the roof have no width. I'm currently out but when I have time I'll split it up into multiple which will hopefully fix the issue. Thanks!
Diacritic (2022-08-27 11:16:43+00:00): This edit is incorrect. There is no physical separation at Henry Street at this intersection. Further, by introducing the superfluous way you have broken the bus route relations.

I have explained, at length, why mapping lanes with no physical separation is incorrect.

Ignoring accepted mapping practice is not acceptable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125429691
Prusaker (2022-09-08 13:09:30+00:00): А зачем было понижать класс дороги Н6002 c tertiary до unclassified? Дороги класса Н в большинстве случаев должны иметь класс как минимум tertiary + это чуть ли не единственная нормальная дорога из Скиделя в Каменку, и она никак не может быть как unclassified.
Антон-1983 (2022-09-11 08:14:52+00:00): Мне как раз жаловались, что это очень плохая дорога без асфальта, а по ней ведёт навигатор. Не подходит под tertiary. Есть лучшая дорога.
Prusaker (2022-09-11 09:28:04+00:00): Наличие или отсутствие асфальта не влияет на класс tertiary. Во внимание принимается важность и назначение дороги.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Belarus:%D0%9A%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3_%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B5_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%91%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85_%D0%BF%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2

"более важные автомобильные дороги среди прочих автомобильных дорог местного значения, например соединяющие районные центры с сёлами, а также несколько сёл между собой"

У нас в РБ это обычно дороги "Н".
Prusaker (2022-09-11 09:34:37+00:00): Если дорога имеет плохое покрытие, то ставятся соответствующие теги (а они поставлены - я там ездил и всё обзначил).
Антон-1983 (2022-09-16 11:26:36+00:00): Ну мы уже много раз спорили по этому поводу. Я считаю, если дорога настолько плоха, что надо вытягивать машину трактором, то она не может быть tertiary. К тому же, я к примеру, составляю маршрут по карте. И хочу видеть хорошие дороги, а не гадать какое там покрытие и есть ли оно. В общем я приверженец классической OSM справки. А не как Вы придумали. tertiary - жто асфальтное покрытие с нанесённой разделительной полосой, чего здесь и в помине нет и не будет.
Prusaker (2022-09-16 11:32:23+00:00): tertiary - это не обязательно асфальтовое покрытие. Нет такого требования нигде в вики. У нас в стране половина таких дорог (tertiary) грунтовые. Мало того, есть грунтовые дороги secondary (и были даже primary), и никому не приходило в голову отмечать их как unclassified.

Трактором вытягивать конкретно с этой дороги машину не надо - там нормальный грейдер, и в любое время года эта дорога нормально проезжаема. Подтверждаю как человек, который по этой дороге ездил в разные времена года.

Класс дороги определяется её назначением, а не 
покрытием.
DmitriyA (2022-09-16 11:40:02+00:00): Каб навігатар не выбіраў, можна дадаць тэг фактычнай максімальная хуткасці. Змяняць клас дарогі няправільна.
maxspeed:practical  60
Османд дакладна гэта ўлічвае.
4004 (2022-09-16 11:50:33+00:00): > Есть лучшая дорога.

Это какая? Если есть дорога лучше, и по ней большинство ездит в Каменку, то я вижу какое то рациональное зерно
Prusaker (2022-09-16 11:53:39+00:00): Возможно речь идёт о М6.
4004 (2022-09-16 12:10:07+00:00): а, ну она и так транк, это не повод понижать другие дороги в округе
Кірыла (2022-09-16 12:56:32+00:00): Калі дарога ў дрэнным стане, то не варта клас яе зніжаць (з улікам таго, што гэта Н-ка), а паставіць неабходныя тэгі і патэлефанаваць ці напісаць у Гроднааблдарбуд, як будзе магчымаць - стан яе палепшаць, напрыклад грэйдэрам пройдуцца.
user_6110846 (2022-08-27 06:47:40+00:00): https://chytomo.com/na-kyivshchyni-perejmenuvaly-vulytsi-shcho-buly-nazvani-na-chest-rosijskykh-pysmennykiv/
kpv8 (2024-08-15 18:44:37+00:00): Dlaczego bezpodstawnie zmieniasz wsie na przysiółki? W geoportalu są to wsie, skąd źródła tych że zmian?
conifermapper (2024-08-15 20:16:23+00:00): Cześć kpv8,

 O które wioski chodzi, ta zmiana było długo temu?
 
conifermapper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
eggie (2022-08-27 09:39:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
abakus_uploader (2022-08-27 22:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-27 22:31:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-27 22:30:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-27 22:31:14+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gscscnd (2022-08-28 13:47:36+00:00): Wielkość liter ma znaczenia, do poprawy.
Niiepce (2022-09-02 09:57:16+00:00): Bitte geben sie unter website=* nur Internetadressen an, die sich genau auf dieses Objekt beziehen und nicht allgemein einen Wikipedia Artikel bezüglich der hier verwendeten Art von Förderanlage. Zudem ist "Archimedische Schraube" kein Eigenname, sondern eher Teil der Beschreibung.
user_2066394 (2022-08-27 09:32:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
☆Finvenkulo (2022-08-31 15:43:10+00:00): Zastosowałem znacznik "kick-scooter_rental=dropoff_point" jako analogię do "bicycle_rental=dropoff_point" opisanego na wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=bicycle_rental).
mueschel (2022-08-31 17:07:19+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the clarification. The whole "rental" tagging in OSM is really messy.
- we have a general approach to used 
"vehicletype:rental" for any kind of vehicles,
- we have "vehicletype_rental", mainly for water vehicles
- and then there is bicycle_rental=*, which doesn't fit to the others, but describes an amenity=bicycle_rental in detail...
- and, last but not least, there is the proposal for proper names for these small electric scooters, which says that "kick_scooter" should refer to the non-powered variant only.


I don't have a good solution to get to one common tagging scheme... In any case, I'd prefer the spelling with an underscore, "kick_scooter", because this is the name used for the vehicle itself (e.g. as an access tag).
☆Finvenkulo (2022-09-01 18:56:31+00:00): EN
My opinion:
1. These vehicles should be called "small_electric_vehicle".
2. The feature which I wanted to tag is simply rectangle painted on the foot-way. There is no guarantee to find a vehicle there, it's not operated by any rental company, rental is done using application/website; it's simply parking.

In analogy to "amenity=bicycle_parking" some people use the tag "amenity=small_electric_vehicle_parking" (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=small_electric_vehicle_parking) and subtag with value "floor" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking).

################
PL
Moja opinia:
1. Właściwym określeniem dla tych pojazdów powinno być "small_electric_vehicle".
2. Obiektem, który chciałem oznaczyć jest prostokąt namalowany na chodniku. Bez gwarancji, że znajdziemy tam hulajnogę, niepowiązany z żadną firmą wynajmującą, wypożyczenie jest dokonywany przez aplikację/stronę; jest to po prostu parking.

Jako analogię do "amenity=bicycle_parking" zaczęto używać znacznika "amenity=small_electric_vehicle_parking" (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=small_electric_vehicle_parking) wraz z podkluczem o wartości "floor" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:bicycle_parking).
mueschel (2022-09-01 20:40:52+00:00): Ah yes, I completly forgot about that one. If you like, feel free to change the node to these tags.
skyper (2022-12-17 17:10:59+00:00): Hi Schnrpl,
yet, again a CS with a big Bbox.
Please, do not change `FIXME` to `fixme` if you do not make other changes to the object.
Are you sure that this is a ford (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9981236501)? Now, you have silenced most QA-tools. If unsure, please ignore warnings, especially if you did not change the objects.
Why did you add https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9981236498? Now there are nodes on the same position which is an error.

Regards skyper
skyper (2022-12-28 15:13:10+00:00): CS zurückgesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130606840
syntex (2022-11-23 18:40:25+00:00): Does not exist
GinaroZ (2022-08-29 09:23:35+00:00): I'm wondering if there's a need for this super relation?
phodgkin (2022-08-30 08:09:37+00:00): Possibly not. I was fixing things so that the two at least had the same network tagging. The SR was "national" and the relation "local", which made no sense!
GinaroZ (2022-08-30 11:07:47+00:00): Hmm, the SR was probably national because the Scottish part is national, maybe it should be two separate relations (without an SR) for either side of the border?
phodgkin (2022-08-30 17:56:16+00:00): I don't think it makes sense to have two separate relations, since the lack of significance of the border is a feature. I don't think the Scottish part is "national" since it only covers a small part of the borders. "regional" works for the route as a whole.
GinaroZ (2022-08-30 21:35:23+00:00): The national/regional distinction is based on whether the relation is recognised as a E+W National Trail, or one of Scotland's Great Trails (which it is) so it seems strange for it to change at the border. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Long-distance_footpaths_in_the_United_Kingdom
phodgkin (2022-08-31 08:09:55+00:00): Hmm. Messy. At a functional level many of the Great Trails seem a bit small to be labelled "national" trails. SCW is shown as "63% mapped" as only the Scottish segment is considered. I think a single "national" relation makes the most sense.
GinaroZ (2022-09-01 15:34:52+00:00): Think the %age is just because nobody has updated it since it was added to the wiki over 10 years, not the distance in Scotland - many others are complete but not 100% on the wiki. 
Question is a) does the route need to be split into two relations at the border (imo no) and b) if so, should the super relation be national or regional?
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-08-30 13:31:08+00:00): Auch hier gilt: Die von Dir angegebenen Quellen sind nicht OSM-kompatibel.

Bitte entferne alle Daten, die Du nicht selbst vor Ort erhoben hast und entferne die Quellen-Verweise.

Kopiere zukünftig keine Daten mehr aus anderen Quellen!
Warin61 (2022-12-26 06:17:30+00:00): Hi,
The relation for 'South Creek' has many duplicated segments. I have removed these. In addition the relation looks like it is a duplication of the tags already on the ways ... so it is redundant?
BCNorwich (2022-08-27 11:22:10+00:00): Hi, Are you sure that house isn't named "The Maltings"?

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2022-09-19 10:55:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please pay attention to this point:
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

Please solve also the issues before you upload your work.
Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-27 09:56:40+00:00): remive image = C:\Users\doncukm\Downloads\kontejnery