piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Strubbl (2022-02-11 14:22:14+00:00): Frankenwall, nicht -damm
LuxuryCoop (2022-02-11 23:27:17+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 큰 문제는 없습니다.
다만 건물의 주소를 입력할 때 `name`(이름) 태그에 건물번호를 입력하셨는데, `name` 태그는 말 그대로 건물의 이름(ex. 행운다가구주택)을 적는 칸입니다. 건물번호는 이름 칸이 아닌 주소를 적는 칸(`addr:housenumber`) 태그에 적어 주셔야 오픈스트리트맵을 이용하는 사람들이 불편함을 겪지 않습니다.
참고로 건물의 도로명은 `addr:street` 태그에 입력하면 됩니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
Gnurpsnewoel (2022-02-11 14:36:42+00:00): Bitte bearbeitet diesen Änderungssatz sehr gerne. Verbesserungen sind sicherlich notwendig, das war sehr umfangreich. Danke!
◪ Jarv (2022-02-12 15:04:51+00:00): Hi Alex,
The source of this change is a user made "google my map", however the owner of this is unclear, as such there may not be any rights to use this data, and would infringe copyright. Also it is dated from 7 years ago, so I'd expect some of these motorcycle parking areas to have been relocated, as well as some more added in that time. Unless you have checked each and every one of these motorcycle parking bays, it ought to not be added, however bing aerial imagery in Brighton should be clear enough to confirm locations of motor cycle parking on their own (Bing imagery dates from about May 2020, so fairly up to date).
Could you check with the owner of the source you used that their data can be used in OSM? If not it will likely have to be removed.

In regards to how you have mapped/tagged the parking areas, I would like to point out that parking=street_side means a parking spot built out of the side of the road (like a layby), not a painted bay on the carriageway as I'd suspect the majority of these to be. They should be parking=lane, to show they are on the main carriageway. The rest of the tagging looks fine at first glance.

Kind regards,
Thomas
Alex Beaven (2022-02-12 22:36:06+00:00): Hi Thomas,

trying to find the author, waiting for a response.  

Also checking each bay, many have moved.

Tagging fixed.

Please await the next changeset.

Cheers,

Alex
Alex Beaven (2022-02-13 21:53:04+00:00): Hi Thomas,

Source owner based it off Brighton and hove council website, made a list and did street address to coordinates, so advised mostly incorrect and also very out of date., but gave permission to use.

https://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/streets-motorcycle-bays#zone-a

I have reviewed all bays using bing imagery, removed dead ones and updated locations. #117290605

Non-exhaustive addition, but a big improvement :)

Cheers,

Alex
◪ Jarv (2022-02-15 21:51:23+00:00): Okay that all sounds alright then. Thanks for following it up!
user_13980615 (2022-02-11 14:44:21+00:00): 影像偏移设定：（9.89, -8.45），此设置仅为了与现有道路、建筑对象对齐，以尽可能少的修改现有对象，与卫星影像的准确度无关。
emo_sami (2022-02-13 12:07:51+00:00): Dear GeoRamesh;
Welcome to OSM! I noticed you aligned many streets away centers and made sharp angles for ways.
Please revert your edit and make OSM better.
examples for errors :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9344170173/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9344118216/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5161578594/history
regards
emo_sami
Robin Bourgeon (2022-02-19 00:19:36+00:00): Une autoroute de quelques km en plein milieu de la Lozère ?! source ?
GeoMechain (2022-02-25 03:28:37+00:00): Ce changeset a été annulé entièrement ou en partie par le changeset 117749522.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117290815
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-08 13:28:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030399858 - what crossing=zebraㅈ means?

Can it be replaced by crossing=zebra ?
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-14 19:53:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
GeoMechain (2022-02-25 03:27:59+00:00): Ce changeset a été annulé entièrement ou en partie par le changeset 117749476.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117291451
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-02-15 11:09:25+00:00): طلما أن هذا المكان يسمى بـ"العقلان" نرجوا منكم عدم تغييره أو حذفه
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-02-15 10:56:06+00:00): طالما أن هذا الموقع يعرف ب"طلابات" نرجوا منكم عدم حذفه
user_5359 (2022-02-12 17:11:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
Dodko (2022-03-05 23:02:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60346050
ak adresa nemá ulicu tak mestská časť sa dáva do addr:place

ak adresa má ulicu tak mestská časť sa dáva do addr:suburb
DUGA (2022-02-12 18:51:51+00:00): Your edit of abandoned railways has been deleted. 

Please do not add them back. If you wish to add such kind of features, please go to https://openhistoricalmap.org/
marczoutendijk (2022-02-12 19:39:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5689


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
eggie (2022-02-11 16:05:38+00:00): Frank.. een tip.. Niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dan krijg je vaak onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Bedrijven svp bijtaggen op de adresnode.. 
Nieuwe gebouwen kun je via het forum laten importeren .. het draadje Verzoek BAG import. We tekenen niet zelf gebouwen in.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Gr eggie
PT-53 (2022-02-12 10:00:28+00:00): Hallo GO_OSM,
diese Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030410799/history
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-02-24 07:58:17+00:00): Hallo GO_OSM, 
dieser Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9498385574/history
hat nur einen Namen, das Hauptmerkmal, um was es sich handelt, fehlt leider.
Andererseits ist der Park ja bereits flächig eingezeichnet:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241503479/history

Um doppelte Einträge zu vermeiden, sollte der Name des Parks (sofern dieser wirklich den Namen "Gemeindepark" trägt) an der Fläche ergänzt und der Name-Knoten gelöscht werden.
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-03-06 07:48:08+00:00): Hallo GO_OSM, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-03-20 08:14:15+00:00): Keine Reaktion, auch nicht auf PN vom 13.03.2022. Schade
Linie gelöscht
eggie (2022-02-11 16:00:20+00:00): Dag frank  Je kunt het best landuse=construction taggen ipv 
construction=yes  (Dat laatste klopt niet area =yes kan ook weg.
name=   veranderen in description=Bouwlocatie nieuw zwembad(park)

Kijk je nog even
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-02-11 16:18:45+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast naar de juiste constructiontags.. fietsenzaak op een node gezet.
Gr eggie
frank_v_s (2022-02-11 16:22:43+00:00): Hoi eggie,

Ik heb je opmerkingen gezien en bedankt daarvoor. Moet ik ju nog iets doen aangezien je al wat aangepast hebt? 

Mvg,
Frank
eggie (2022-02-11 16:31:47+00:00): Ik was weer te snel.  😀
Je kunt t even checken..
Paar keer op ctrl f5 drukken voor het effect.
Je zou voor de fietsenzaak een import verzoek kunnen doen op het forum.
Mits het al in de BAG staat.
Gr eggie
frank_v_s (2022-02-11 16:35:11+00:00): Oké ga ik doen. Dat gaat via het forum zei je?
eggie (2022-02-11 16:39:57+00:00): Yep.. inlog identiek aan osm account.. draadje .. Verzoek bag import bovenin..
Wellicht kan van het zwembad ook al iets geimporteerd worden. Soms wachttijd wegens eerste accountcheck
frank_v_s (2022-02-14 12:12:51+00:00): Eggie,

Ik heb zitten kijken op het forum maar kan niets vinden met Verzoek bag import.
eggie (2022-02-14 12:26:06+00:00): Hoi...  
Wanneer het gebouw er al daadwerkelijk staat kan ik het wel aanvragen via het forum. 
Het is dit draadje. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=855242#p855242
Het staat nu nog op Bouwvergunning verleend.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=kozijnenhoek&resultOffset=0&objectId=0840100000322237&geometry.x=98718.628017945&geometry.y=394659.96100576&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0840010000322239

Dus even de vraag of de nieuwbouw hier al gereed is.
Wanneer er daadwerkelijk wordt gebouwd kan een aanvraag ook al. 
Laat maar weten
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-02-14 12:32:50+00:00): 'k Vraag het wel even aan al voorbeeld hoe zo iets gaat.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=14-02-2021&loc=51.53823%2C4.574540%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-10-09&acqid=20211009_110524_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1

Het gebouw staat er inmiddels
eggie (2022-02-14 12:36:55+00:00): Aanvraag loopt.. even als voorbeeld hoe we zoiets doen
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=855324#p855324

Gr eggie
frank_v_s (2022-02-14 13:15:13+00:00): Ik heb het gezien, zie ook nu waar ik moet kijken. Bedankt.
FrankOverman (2022-02-14 19:10:45+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=855353#p855353
eggie (2022-02-15 07:17:26+00:00): Frank Overman bedankt..  
en..
Frank_v_s
Je gebouw-info heb ik overgezet naar de BAG import.
De winkelinfo staat op BAG-adresnode 5

Het zuidelijke gebouw staat nog op construction. 
Hoe de wegen op de parkeerplaats nu lopen is even de vraag. 
Die heb ik ooit in 2018 gemapt, maar die lopen nu anders denk ik. (in-en uitgang?)
Up to you. 

Gr eggie
frank_v_s (2022-02-15 07:26:59+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Ja dat klopt, het zuidelijke gebouw is het nieuwe buiten zwembad met verrijdbare overkapping die in aanbouw is. Ik ga de wegen controleren en aanpassen waar nodig. Ziet er goed uit zo verder :).
eggie (2022-02-15 07:51:39+00:00): Je kunt ook evt de openingestijden aanpassen van de fietsenwinkel.
De format klopt niet. Dat Closed kan ook weg. 
Vul in deze tool alles in en plak het resultaat achter opening_hours

openingsuren-tool: 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 
eggie
frank_v_s (2022-02-15 08:06:18+00:00): Done. Tevens gelijk de andere gegevens ingevuld / aangepast
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-02-15 11:26:39+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم العبث بالخريطة وحذف الأماكن بلا سبب
eggie (2022-02-11 16:09:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Het is niet conform de conventie van OSM om Prullenbakken adressen en namen te geven. 
Zie ook..
Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-11 20:57:52+00:00): Dag Lisanne, 
name=...  heb ik weer verwijderd.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-11 21:00:21+00:00): Kijk eens naar http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/ voor eigen layer in OSM .
Gr eggie
DUGA (2022-02-12 19:00:28+00:00): Your edit of abandoned railways has been deleted.

Please do not add them back. If you wish to add such kind of features, go to https://openhistoricalmap.org/
marczoutendijk (2022-02-12 19:39:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5689


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
gscscnd (2022-02-11 18:10:15+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030413350> nie powinno być oznaczone jako <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential>. Raczej commercial lub industrial.
literan (2022-02-11 20:52:02+00:00): класс!
Danysan95 (2023-01-09 08:23:45+00:00): The value of the tag name:etymology:wikidata=Q1020857338 added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13793097 in this changeset is not a valid Wikidata ID
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117293853
A Hall (2023-01-09 14:27:15+00:00): Fixed!
lololailo (2022-02-12 22:16:34+00:00): Hola, todas esas areas que están juntas es mejor que las dibujes en una sola area más grande que incluya la calle tambien.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117294104
Carto'Cité (2022-07-05 14:55:33+00:00): Bonjour Sardon,
Attention tu as changé en piste cyclable l’Avenue Albert Gravé (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030420533). Je corrige car j'imagine au regard de la situation que c'est une erreur. Si ce n'est pas une erreur et que la rue a réellement été fermée et qu'elle a été transformée en piste, il faut un commentaire très explicite et une source pour aider à comprendre la situation. N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des questions ou des remarques.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
MarcoR (2022-02-13 08:28:26+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o!
Non sono del luogo ma ho controllato la tua modifica e non ho trovato errori. Ricorda che i civici in Italia sono associati all'ingresso e non all'edificio e che quindi andrebbero posizionati nel punto in cui si trova la relativa entrata/uscita; per maggiori info consulta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l.27Italia

A presto,
Marco
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117294367
知の巨人 (2022-02-12 14:20:00+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117298827
OttoR (2022-11-08 13:06:37+00:00): ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 11:14:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122245102 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6058 .
praeteritum (2022-07-25 02:29:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124029191.
bxl-forever (2022-02-11 21:15:03+00:00): Hello,

I think it’s best to remove all those "designated" tags.  First, this make no sense on the continent (iD is a very basic editor, it does not filter out the irrelevant presets), and more importantly it overrides the "access=no" restriction you have introduced.
I gather this should be "access=no" for everyone, right?
Noudejans (2022-02-15 08:13:52+00:00): Hello, thanks for your feedback. I'm learning,

Well it's an inner garden (binnentuin). And for sure, if at all, you can only enter by foot. It's not public area, but it's a garden and if in the land lords allows you can probably visit. For now I will change and say it's allowed by foot and nothing else.
bxl-forever (2022-02-15 14:26:43+00:00): Fine.
highway=footway + access=private is all you need here.
John Kastner (2022-02-11 17:28:04+00:00): hi, this segment of road should not be deleted. While there are barriers blocking access to cars, the intersection is still traversable on foot or bicycle.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117296064
bolli24 (2022-02-13 15:58:42+00:00): Hi, warum hast du alle Gärten gelöscht?
SafetyIng (2022-02-13 19:05:18+00:00): Hey, viele waren von der Lage einfach extrem falsch (mehrere Gärten oft zusammen gefasst, ein Garten war aufgeteilt). Auch war hier die multiple Verwendung von Multipolygonen so massiv, dass es anders keine Lösung gab....
CjMalone (2022-07-04 20:13:59+00:00): There are advantages to having the businesses on nodes, I'd prefer it if you didn't move them to buildings.
richlv (2024-05-22 20:15:05+00:00): Skatoties uz https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9468467235 , droši vien būtu jāņem nost name* - varbūt uz description jāpārliek.

Kā ar access, vai =customers būtu pareizi?
artuuurs (2024-05-22 22:00:50+00:00): Jā, tā gan jau ir pareizāk. Tu jau esi eksperts :) Un tur tagad ir viesu māja uztaisīta, nezinu, vai parkings tai ir tieši tajā vietā vai nedaudz citā. Ja turpat, tad tas vairs nav tikai "ski parking". Varu uzjautāt īpašniekam.
richlv (2024-05-23 08:42:28+00:00): Visi jau mēs te kopā veidojam "ekspertumu" :)

Šobrīd pārliku "name" uz "description" un pieliku access=customers - šķiet, tas pagaidām pietiekami.
M!dgard (2023-08-27 15:51:20+00:00): Hi, the name:etymology:wikidata tag is only for Wikidata IDs. You can enter free text in name:etymology.
multimob (2023-08-28 08:36:57+00:00): Yes, true. We added etymology wikidata for hundreds of public transport stops, it was manual work, and apparently for this one I copied the name instead of the ID. Thanks for having changed it.
SHARCRASH (2022-02-11 17:37:38+00:00): + access added on path
Frans S (2022-02-23 10:34:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
a small remark. The tag highway= residential is only to be used in urban areas, towns big villages etc.
I retagged them.
Please pay also attention on the issues shown by the issue triangle and solved them before uploading your mappings
Best regards and keep mapping
tomhukins (2024-02-13 17:13:18+00:00): Thank you for your helpful work mapping the Derwent Aqueduct.

The name "Syphon Outlet" in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203987332 looks like a description not a name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
archpdx (2022-02-11 22:55:04+00:00): Hi djerm,
In the future, please be more careful when realigning huge areas like these. As you can see in the link below you dragged a bunch of nodes and areas miles away from where they were. This was too much to be fixed by hand so I decided to revert this changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117297706
martien-176 (2022-02-11 19:05:02+00:00): Hi youngmapper, thanks for mapping. Unfortunately, there are a few issues here. You mapped a road, but forgot to assign a tag to it. Some buildings are tagged as building=building, they should be building=yes. Also, please pay attention to the squarness of their corners. Fortunately, there are also buildings that are mapped well. Thanks and regards, Martien HOT validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117297909
Jordi MF (2022-05-19 18:12:45+00:00): Hola Kike,
He visto que hace un tiempo modificaste la categoría de la carretera V-30. Debiste dedicarle mucho tiempo, pero, ¿por qué cambiaste la categoría de "highway=motorway_link" a "highway=trunk"? Entiendo que le querrías dar menos importancia que la calzada principal que transcurre paralela. Pero sigue tratándose de la misma autopista V-30 (las señales así lo indican) y, según las Directrices de etiquetado españolas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas#Comunitat_Valenciana), debería etiquetarse como autopista. Antes estaba mapeada como vía de enlace, lo cual tampoco estoy seguro que sea lo correcto. ¿Qué opinas?
Saludos
Jordi MF (2022-05-22 20:45:20+00:00): He revisitado la zona y, en estas vías que has marcado como "trunk", aunque son parte de la V-30, existen carteles de "fin de autopista". Por tanto, ahora pienso que están bien como las dejaste.
KikeTM (2022-05-22 23:15:18+00:00): Hola Jordi, se trata justo de lo que comentas en el ultimo mensaje. Esas vias carecen de señalización de autovía o autopista, ademas al acceder a ellas desde la calzada principal de la V-30,  pasamos señales de fin de autovía. Un saludo!
Friendly_Ghost (2022-02-11 19:03:52+00:00): Hi bruh, could you describe in a bit more detail what you did in this changeset, please?
Emilius123 (2022-02-11 19:07:05+00:00): Hi, Casper, thanks for asking: Everything.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-02-11 19:41:21+00:00): Fair enough. Thank you for your elaborate reply. Don't forget to drink ample water and to stretch your muscles every now and then while you're doing long mapping sessions.
Emilius123 (2022-02-11 20:05:59+00:00): Thank you for your tips. Are my current two of my 30-second-walking sessions a day enough to keep myself healthy?
Emilius123 (2022-02-11 21:56:19+00:00): I take that as a yes, great.
Patr1k_P (2022-02-13 14:48:39+00:00): snaz sa zachovavat historiu ci uz ciest, budov alebo inych objektov...kruhovy objazd uz tam bol, nemusel si ho mazat...a nepreniesol si ani vsetky znacky, chyba tam junction=roundabout

p.s. doplnil som budovu Mobelixu
Patr1k_P (2022-02-13 14:54:52+00:00): a keby sa ti chcelo na prieskum, tu je uz rocna poznamka ze tam je kruhac...zatial ani v katastri nie je, ani na aktualnej mozaike

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2559994
John Dumpling (2022-02-14 17:28:46+00:00): ďakujem za info, prvý raz som pridával niečo také, upravím to (plus díky za ten Mobelix)
martien-176 (2022-02-11 19:32:17+00:00): Hi Sillililli, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. I think you misunderstood the instructions. You should free draw a closed line around a group of buildings with the attribute landuse=residential. Then map the individual buildings as building=yes (let them not cross the residential border). And place a node in the middle of the group with the attribute place=hamlet or place=village. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117298830
janolezab (2022-02-11 20:58:20+00:00): I think smaller changeset bounding boxes would be nice. These are only a few benches added, one of them not even in Europe.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
user_12887748 (2022-02-12 09:38:28+00:00): Yes, you are right. I'm currently asking PanierAvide to remove this mission.
lololailo (2022-02-12 22:12:23+00:00): Hola, cuando edites un edificio alto ten en cuenta que lo que hay que reflejar es la base del edificio ya que si editas la azotea puede que  no reflejas la realidad. Además tienes que respetar la forma del edificio.
Un saludo.
Lorenzo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117299140
martien-176 (2022-02-11 19:15:43+00:00): Hi Demetrios, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The building you mapped is well done as to the location. But pay attention to the squarness of the corners. Always map buildings as square as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. Then you are good. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117299412
Frans S (2022-02-22 09:35:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A remark. 
Please do not just mark a cluster of buildings as a residential area.
Each building has to be mapped individually, (map residential areas as from clusters of  4-5 buildings.
Best regards
archpdx (2022-03-19 07:25:43+00:00): Hi,
Are you sure Heritage House Inn occupies this whole area? From imagery it looks like this area has around 3-4 different properties.

I would also remove the building tags, these are only used for building outlines:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:building

Looking at your username, it looks like you might be working for Zartico. If so, please link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zartico on your profile to comply with https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-17 14:24:40+00:00): Please don't use building tag for large areas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117300037
ivanbranco (2022-02-11 19:25:39+00:00): Hi Abby,

welcome to OSM :)

could you consider adding meaningful changeset comments? See:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy mapping
MWXNG (2022-02-12 10:46:23+00:00): thanks a lot for your edit :)
user_5359 (2022-02-13 09:52:29+00:00): Hallo! Ich verstehe ja, wenn Adress-Daten ergänzt werden, aber warum werden bei einem geschlossenen Geschäft noch Kontaktdaten ergänzt (zumal die Webseite auch langsam gelöscht wird)?
müllers (2022-02-13 15:36:31+00:00): Die Kontaktdaten (vom letzten Mitarbeiter [auch Webseite]) wurden nicht ergänzt, sondern vom Gebäude auf einen POI übertragen. Ergänzt wurde: Objekt geschlossen. Die vom "Vorarbeiter" gesetzten Daten wurden beibehalten ---> warum? ---> Im Frühjahr aktiviert der Finanzdienstleister Eichler die Therme. Da hätte man die alten Inhalte nur umschreiben müssen. 
Ich habe aber trotzdem die überschüssigen Daten gelöscht.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-17 14:14:52+00:00): Please don't add fake buildings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117300345
知の巨人 (2022-02-11 19:44:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments