piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
urbalazs (2022-02-06 14:36:18+00:00): Csak jelzem, hogy az iD editor tönkreteszi a meglévő kapcsolatokat, ha olyan utat szerkesztesz vele, ami része egy kapcsolatnak. Ez történt ezzel a módosításcsomaggal is. Ez nem a te hibád, hanem az iD editoré. Mostantól minden szerkesztőnek jelezni fogom ezt, aki valamit önhibáján kívül elront, hogy ne használja az iD editort, hanem inkább a JOSM-mel dolgozzon.
Gisolic (2022-02-06 12:31:25+00:00): Hello Akam Aziz,
I notice you added many "oneway" tag in streets thats make it dead end and changed the classification for ways, Could you provide us with the source you added in ways?
regards
Gisolic
vlakos555 (2022-02-06 08:11:17+00:00): ospravedlňujem sa za chyby. Je to zložité. Radšej to už nebudem robiť.
Posledné som pridal VarMar rehab (len ako poznámku) na Vyšehradskej 29, aj to je tam zas dvojmo. Nechápem to. Sorry.
Gisolic (2022-02-06 12:33:25+00:00): Hello Akam Aziz,
I notice you added many "oneway" tag in streets thats make it dead end and changed the classification for ways, Could you provide us with the source you added in ways?
regards
Gisolic
Gisolic (2022-02-06 12:34:21+00:00): Hello Akam Aziz,
I notice you added many "oneway" tag in streets thats make it dead end and changed the classification for ways, Could you provide us with the source you added in ways?
regards
Gisolic
4004 (2022-02-06 23:58:57+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. неужто полгода такая красота висела
A67-A67 (2022-03-13 16:36:16+00:00): There isn't a physical separation, only a solid line. I've restored the lane-tagging and added the tag change:lanes for the solid line.
Raa39 (2022-03-13 16:44:17+00:00): Каким навигатором вы пользуетесь?
A67-A67 (2022-03-13 18:52:03+00:00): Please use English or Dutch for comments in the Netherlands.

I don't use a navigator, but volunteer for Openstreetmap. We only use separate ways when there is a physical separation. This is not the case here.
user_5359 (2022-02-06 07:45:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
user_5359 (2022-02-06 07:29:50+00:00): Hello! See https://www.osm.org/changeset/116549884
eggie (2022-02-05 23:12:10+00:00): Hi Velizipede,
The combination bicycle=yes foot=yes access=no is mostly not correct.
The bollard will stop the cars. No need for access=no.
I removed access=no
Greetz,
eggie
Lee Carré (2022-02-08 17:41:12+00:00): source=Joe ?
Emilius123 (2022-02-08 22:15:47+00:00): Joe Mama
eggie (2022-02-05 23:16:26+00:00): Dag Jordi.. Je had hier twee bruggen op elkaar geplakt. Ik heb er één verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
Jordidv (2022-02-06 10:30:03+00:00): Oké, ik begrijp niet hoe ik dat niet door heb gehad, maar met vallen en opstaan... :)
eggie (2022-02-06 10:35:16+00:00):  O problem.. Vermoedelijk heb je een lijn heen en terug ingetekend.
Vespucci is niet de ideale editor.
Je zou eens naar Josm kunnen kijken.
Mapse
Eggie
eggie (2022-02-06 11:15:41+00:00): O? Typo No problem.. 😀
Schaatsen kijken en typen gaat niet samen.
Tomas Straupis (2022-02-09 07:25:00+00:00): O šitokie keliai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1028520312 tikrai atskirti nuo važiuojamosios dalies kažkokiu fiziniu barjeru (pagal ortofoto tai ne)? Nes jei tai tiesiog šaligatvis, esam sutarę tokių nežymėti.
CorruptComputer (2022-02-05 23:00:08+00:00): Whoops, looks like the link was cut off in the commit message. Here is what that was supposed to be: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
ZLima12 (2022-02-28 19:12:00+00:00): Hi,

I appreciate your effort in this changeset, but I had a few questions about it, since I'm not a Rochester native.

First of all, I know that the Inner Loop is signed as such and referred to as that name by locals. However, why did you add ref=IL? Are you just adding an initialism? Is this signed anywhere or generally recognized by locals? If not, we're trying to eliminate this usage of ref around the state and beyond. Please tell me what your motivation was for adding this tag, though.

Also, it looks like you added `name=Outer Loop` to, well, the outer loop. It doesn't look like you added `ref=OL`, presumably since the members of the outer loop already have refs. The few times I've been through the area, I don't recall seeing signage saying outer loop as much as the inner loop. Is it the obvious name to the average local?

And again, I'd like to invite you to the OSMUS Slack. With all of the contributions you've been making in New York, I think we'd all benefit from having you in the conversation. If you join, please join the #local-newyorkstate channel and say hi. You can join at: https://slack.openstreetmap.us

I hope to see you there!
ivanbranco (2022-02-10 18:40:48+00:00): Ciao Federico,

qua il nome inserito "Barber Shop" sembra un nome descrittivo. Inoltre salvo rare eccezioni il name e il name:it dovrebbero essere identici in Italia. Puoi verificare?
user_5359 (2022-02-07 11:17:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/148400585, https://www.osm.org/way/1028524490. What is the meaning of the tag yes = no?
user_5359 (2022-02-10 09:25:14+00:00): Move the wrong tag to note.
lucasbenninger (2022-02-10 14:27:54+00:00): Hey, sorry about that.  Didn't see the emails coming in.  I made an entry error.  I'll remove the tags.  Thanks.
Adam Franco (2022-02-08 00:55:36+00:00): Hi barndny, what is your reasoning for upgrading the LOSP to motorway? As described in 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_York/Highway_Classification/2021_Classification_Project
the LOSP has been designated with an Arterial Classification Code (ACC) of 3 which maps it to `highway=primary`. 

NY's Arterial Classification Code (ACC) is a connectivity-based code that is being used to categorize highways in NY.

Could you please reclassify back to highway=primary + expressway=yes? I'd rather not do a full revert and lose all of your bridge changes.
Adam Franco (2022-02-08 02:01:24+00:00): It turns out that it wasn't too hard to manually revert the classification while leaving the rest of your changes in place, so no need for further action. Please do reach out if you have any questions about highway classification as this is an ongoing project around the country.

I see you're doing a lot of editing around upstate NY. Lots of other mappers in the area are collaborating on highway classification and other mapping topics in the OSM-US Slack at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ . Join us in the #local-newyorkstate and #highway-classification channels if you're interested.

Best,
Adam
SomeoneElse (2022-02-06 09:48:16+00:00): Hello g1750,
You've changed the road here from a secondary to a residential here - has the classification really changed?
Best Regards,
Andy
g1750 (2022-02-12 20:50:54+00:00): Hi Andy,
Accident, apologies! Was trying to change a side road to residential (off of Puttenham Heath Rd), this road should remain secondary
Cheers
g1750 (2022-02-12 20:58:16+00:00): Please do change the road back to secondary if you are able to !
SomeoneElse (2022-02-12 21:00:42+00:00): Yes - no problem - will do!
Adam Franco (2022-02-08 00:59:01+00:00): See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117064005

With the new 2021 US Highway classification project highway=trunk is no longer used to indicate "expressway" construction. Use expressway=yes for this. 

Please revert this segment back to highway=primary.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
GerdP (2023-07-31 13:51:59+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich werte gerade meine Fotos von einer längeren Radtour aus. Dabei bin ich u.a. auf der "Niedersächsische Mühlen-Tour" durch Bogoh gefahren. Ich habe dabei vor allem Fotos von Wegweisern gemacht. Jetzt wundere ich mich gerade über diesen Geh- und Radweg: https://www.osm.org/way/28002255
Zumindest in Borgloh ist der nicht geschottert, sondern gepflastert. Soviel kann ich auf meinen Fotos erkennen. Vielleicht kannst Du die Situation in Borloh noch mal anschauen?
herisusa (2023-08-02 10:38:24+00:00): Paving stones stimmt, hab`s gerade geändert.
GerdP (2023-08-02 10:51:41+00:00): Danke. An der Hauptstraße in Borgloh müsste wohl auch noch was geändert werden. Im Moment ist dort
bicycle=yes
cycleway=track
Also beidseitig Radwege.
Zumindest teilweise müsste dort ein cycleway:left=separate draus werden.
Meine Fotos zeigen leider nicht, ob man in Borgloh den Radweg benutzen muss oder nicht. Ein kurzes Stück ist zumindest ein reiner Fußweg.
archie (2022-02-06 01:05:23+00:00): Vänligen använd ordentliga kommentarer. Vad är det du korrigerar/rättar?
archie (2022-02-06 01:41:05+00:00): Jag blir väldigt konfunderad. Enl källor från vilka vi inte får kopiera har Hästfjället en höjd om 986 meter, medan du anger 880 meter. Vilken eller vilka källor har du använt?
archie (2022-02-06 01:05:13+00:00): Vänligen använd ordentliga kommentarer. Vad är det du korrigerar/rättar?
archie (2022-02-06 01:36:26+00:00): Enl upphovsrättligt skyddade källor har Hammerdalsfjället en höjd om 869 meter. Du anger 846 meter. Vilket är dina källor?
Enl likaledes upphovsrättsligt skyddade källor har Tjärndalsfjället en höjd om 852 meter. Du anger 840 meter. Vilket är dina källor?
Vänligen återkom med svar. Måhända är detta endast ett missförstånd, men det måste redas ut.
MxxCon (2022-02-06 06:03:09+00:00): Hello.
In this edit it seems like you mapped ladder 172 and engine 330 twice, as nodes and building. Mapping like this goes against OSM's guideline of "one feature - one OSM element". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
It would be best if such data wasn't duplicated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117064819
BeKri (2022-02-06 00:49:49+00:00): Kommentar
Add residential buildings #maproulette
ist Blödsinn von mit
Update Jacques im Umfeld passend
limes11 (2023-12-07 21:52:05+00:00): Hi

was ist das?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6441671022

Katzenfigur? Statue? 

Beste Grüße

Limes
Laci (2023-12-08 00:49:10+00:00): Hi, es handelt sich um ein Aussengehege für eine Katze in einem Garten, und danaben ein Schild mit der Aufschrift "Kampfkatze"
limes11 (2023-12-08 06:11:22+00:00): Ah okay. Würde ich entfernen, zu privat. Mit den Tags wird es womöglich in manchen Apps als Attraktion angezeigt und führt Nutzer hierher.
archie (2022-02-06 01:05:02+00:00): Vänligen använd ordentliga kommentarer. Vad är det du korrigerar/rättar?
archie (2022-02-06 01:25:37+00:00): Ulvåskaftet har enligt öppet tillgängliga (ej upphovsrättligt skyddade) källor en höjd om 1082 meter. Du anger en höjd om 1071 meter. Åter min fråga vilket är dina källor för dessa höjduppgifter?
stca1 (2022-02-06 00:48:22+00:00): Correction: Willow Lane is the street name
ivanbranco (2022-02-12 10:06:12+00:00): Hi Qualhano,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9482390659/history

place=Santo Antônio do Mutum is not a valid place value. Maybe you wanted to use addr:place=Santo Antônio do Mutum instead? Could you check it out?
MxxCon (2022-02-06 06:04:37+00:00): Similarly to your previous edit, you mapped engine 253 as both node and building. This is not the best way to map such feature.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117065206
gscholz (2022-02-07 06:09:45+00:00): Hi osm-contributor,
your "clean up" did result in errors in the OSM database regarding destroyed boundary relations for "Parque Nacional Cerros de Amotape", "Pampas de Hospital" and "San Juan de la Virgen":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-80.39486&lat=-3.95551&zoom=10

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117065518

Can you please clean this up?
Kind Regards
Guido
osm-contributor (2022-02-07 15:33:35+00:00): Hi Guido,

I wasn't aware that I've created errors. I apologize for doing so. However, I'm not sure how to fix the errors. Is it possible to undo the changeset?

Sincerely,
osm-contributor
gscholz (2022-02-07 16:26:33+00:00): Hi osm-contributor,
I have fixed the errors now and I like to propose to use JOSM as editor if you edit relations. May be you like to learn what relations, especially boundary relations are:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary

Guido
osm-contributor (2022-02-07 17:19:54+00:00): Hi Guido,

Thank you very much! I've installed JOSM and I'm starting to learn how to use it. Thank you for the link.

Sincerely,
osm-contributor
Diacritic (2022-02-06 10:29:01+00:00): Hey Chonker!

Impressive detail work, as always.

I'm curious though, what was the reason for splitting the carriageways  at Partridge Cres and Buxton Cres, as there doesn't seem to be any physical separation?

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117065625
user_5359 (2022-02-06 07:40:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add the information about religion (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion) and denomination.
karson_ (2022-03-03 23:45:32+00:00): You deleted the place=* tag for Manson in this changeset
ovruni (2022-02-06 06:33:17+00:00): Hola 1Roy1, gracias por contribuir a OSM. Por favor agregar un texto en el conjunto de cambios [0] sobre lo realizado (aparte del  #osmpe-project-5 ).
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
brainwad (2022-02-22 11:54:10+00:00): How did you decide there were no cycle lanes on Baslerstrasse (way #699662519)? They were there on the ground when I was last there in Autumn, even though they aren't in the aerial imagery.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-06 03:56:33+00:00): This makes absolutely no sense. Tell your application to fix itself if it can't handle `access=private`.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-02-06 20:19:36+00:00): vi que voce deletou algumas coisas aqui, por exemplo deletou uma via que entrava nesta escola: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292246703 por que fez isto?
zyphlar (2022-02-06 07:21:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing! This changeset looks fine however minor correction, an address probably doesn't belong on a swimming pool. Even if the entire contents of an address were a public swimming pool, you'd probably tag the address on the building or whole facility (or just a single point out front) rather than giving the water itself an address. And in the case of an apartment complex, it's super likely that the address will be duplicated elsewhere, like the main office or front entrance. So removing the address tags here and making sure the address is properly represented elsewhere without duplication is a good improvement.

Finally, a major thing about pools is whether they're public, open to customers/residents, or private. So filling in the appropriate access tag is always nice for pools.

Thanks again and cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117066902
zyphlar (2022-02-06 07:34:22+00:00): Looks great, and as before the address most properly belongs to the church, not the parking lot. We just completed a countywide address import, so >90% of all addresses should already exist. Because of where we got the data from, inside SR City limits addresses will usually be points floating on their own, and outside they will often be attached to a building. Regardless, there should always be one object for each unique address, and it's a judgment call whether you make that a point or copy it over to the whole building or both. A house or civic building for example probably doesn't need a separate address point floating around, whereas a strip mall should probably have each unit tagged with its own POI.

Anyway, that's a long winded way of saying welcome again to Sonoma County OSM and the only improvement here would be removing the address on things whose address is already tagged elsewhere.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117066923
skyper (2023-01-25 18:26:23+00:00): Hi Alex,
Was the change from `man_made=tower` to `man_made=communications_tower` correct (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4569796487)? Communications Towers are usually huge, e.g. the one on Alexanderplatz, Berlin, Germany, has several decks including a restaurant and souvenir shops. See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4569796487.

I found some more on Cuba:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9373738777
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849151229
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849180693
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9934557765
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849151227
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849180691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9273534925
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849151230
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849180694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849151225
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849180689
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849151228
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849180692
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3902220089
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849151226
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849180690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9405572993
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3789564942
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9849151231

Take care,
skyper
AlexLabrada (2023-02-24 21:00:32+00:00): You are right
nevw (2022-02-06 23:37:37+00:00): Hi
there are a lot of untagged points in this changeset. Also some of the address (lot numbers ?) in Lucknow Park have been deleted. Waste bins near the sports grounds in the school have been deleted - have they been removed or maybe replaced by plastic wheely bins.
nevw (2022-02-06 23:53:49+00:00): I 'll leave to MSFT editorial team to sort out.
BrackoNe (2022-02-07 06:16:43+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for raising this up. This will be checked by our editors in the next few hours.
Herrieman (2022-02-09 19:44:40+00:00): Hi, je hebt de highway vlakken die ik een tijdje geleden gemapt hebt verwijderd. Zou je dat volgende keer eerst in overleg kunnen doen? Zeker aangezien er nu incomplete/doodlopende wegen ontstaan zijn. De kwaliteit van de kaart is dus omlaag gegaan door jouw bewerking.
Herrieman
padvinder (2022-02-09 23:46:24+00:00): 'highway-vlakken' was ik nog nooit tegengekomen. Je creeert daarmee gewoon grote witte vlakken op de kaart die geen informatie bieden. Ogen hetzelfde als vlakken zonder mapping. Daarom was mijn oog er op gevallen. Maar het mag in principe wel. Volgens mij is het gewoon groot parkeerterrein. Prima om daarop service-highways aan te geven als je wilt. Die heb ik overigens weer aangesloten op de Paviljoenlaan.  Dus geen doodlopende wegen meer. Je zou er nog aan toe kunnen voegen service = parking_aisle.
padvinder (2022-02-09 23:47:50+00:00): sorry. Ik zie dat je parking_aisle al had toegevoegd.
Herrieman (2022-02-10 16:14:06+00:00): Ja zo is het ook prima inderdaad. Die vlakken had ik ook mn twijfels over eerlijk gezegd. Ging er meer om dat het nu leek alsof je gewoon dingen weggehaald had zonder het weer 'kloppend' te maken.
Mordechai23 (2022-02-06 19:47:12+00:00): dodajesz drogi bez tagu highway...
Mordechai23 (2022-02-06 19:48:33+00:00): idzie revert bo twój sposób dodawania setek danych o zerowej jakości podchodzi pod wandalizm
h551w (2022-02-06 05:22:59+00:00): Yep, that's Middleton
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 14:00:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562635356/history has cuisine = japanese;회 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be cuisine = japanese
?

If extra character at the end is intentional - would it be possible to express that cuisine as an English value so it would be understood more easily? See some already documented values in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine
user_5359 (2022-02-06 07:08:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note that we only note real things (height=200). Please be sure to do so.
skquinn (2022-02-09 05:07:24+00:00): How did you figure out the maxheight from satellite imagery?
CurlingMan13 (2022-02-09 05:18:01+00:00): Whoops, forgot to include the note as a source:

Note #3037715
skquinn (2022-02-06 11:23:53+00:00): What errors were you correcting here?
CurlingMan13 (2022-02-06 17:25:19+00:00): Someone put in no left turn restrictions, kind of poorly. And checking the street images, there were no sogns restricting the left or right turns in any direction.
skquinn (2022-02-06 17:27:58+00:00): Why not "Removed bogus turn restrictions" as your changeset comment, then?  It would have made it much easier to understand what was going on, as "corrected errors" doesn't really say much. That's what the changeset comment is for.
marczoutendijk (2022-02-07 09:49:21+00:00): Can you use more informative changeset comments? All we do is correction of the map, but what did you correct?
Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
더 유익한 변경 집합 주석을 사용할 수 있습니까? 우리가 하는 일은 지도를 수정하는 것뿐인데 무엇을 수정하셨나요?
읽어주세요: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-02-07 09:48:51+00:00): Can you use more informative changeset comments? All we do is correction of the map, but what did you correct?
Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
더 유익한 변경 집합 주석을 사용할 수 있습니까? 우리가 하는 일은 지도를 수정하는 것뿐인데 무엇을 수정하셨나요?
읽어주세요: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-03-14 11:37:09+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir mal den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85459998/history an. Warum hast Du hier das Tag shop=car entfernt?
STM-Stivi (2022-03-14 13:52:53+00:00): Das Autohaus Riva gibt es nicht mehr. Und es gibt keinen Nachfolger in diesem Gebäude.
user_5359 (2022-03-14 13:57:39+00:00): Hallo! Ich habe mir mal erlaubt die Schlüssel
email, phone, second_hand und  website, die noch auf das Autohaus verweisen, zu löschen.
eggie (2022-02-06 07:28:12+00:00): Dag mihaak..
Tip... Er is een nieuwe achtergrond. PDOK actueel 7cm. Dan zie je het pad ook beter lopen.
Die kun je dus beter instellen. 
Het paadje heb ik losgemaakt van de sloot. 
fine_gravel lijkt me inderdaad meer aannemelijk .
Mapse,
eggie
mihaak (2022-02-06 13:06:56+00:00): Ik zag bij het langsfietsen dat het pad naar ZW afboog vlak voor het fietspad. Ik zal op de betere achtergrond nog eens kijken. Iemand anders heeft het pad ook al wat nauwkeuriger gelegd.
eggie (2022-02-06 13:09:16+00:00): Dat zal ik wel zijn geweest. 😀
Владимир К (2022-05-07 13:27:47+00:00): вы нарисовали двустороннюю улицу, а поверх нее одностороннюю. так что в итоге произошло? я бы советовал немного разобраться в редактировании, пройти обучение хотя бы встроенное в редактор, прежде чем продолжать правки. очень долго за вами исправлять
eggie (2022-02-06 08:52:18+00:00): Beste mihaak..

Wegensplitsen met een (fiets)route kun je niet splitsen zonder schade aan de routerelaties. Wanneer je dat wil doen gebruik dan editor JOSM.
Ik kijk even of het simpel te herstellen is.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-06 09:24:20+00:00): Je was bezig met de beste bedoelingen, maar zonder ervaring liever geen routerelaties bewerken. 
Al die routedelen verliezen hun volgode. 
Knooppuntfietsroute 64-65  is weer hersteld.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-06 08:56:22+00:00): Ook hier is de routerelaties stuk omdat je knipt met editor iD.
Die is niet geschikt voor knipwerk in fiets wandel of OV routes.
eggie
eggie (2022-02-06 08:57:13+00:00): Routerelatie hersteld
mihaak (2022-02-06 13:09:24+00:00): Ik heb JOSM geïnstalleerd om herhaling van verbreken relaties te voorkomen. Bedankt voor het bijwerken!
eggie (2022-02-06 13:18:00+00:00): Mooi... en dan is de truc om op één plaats te splisen en dan op de volgende plek. Dus niet op twee punten tegelijk.. anders draaien twee routerelatiedelen verkeerd om.
Checken doe je achteraf door in het relatievenster te kijken of de streepjes netjes aansluiten.
Mapse
Eggie