piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:30:06+00:00): Wycofane.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:18:01+00:00): Wycofane.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 20:40:27+00:00): Suchy zbiornik to, jak nazwa wskazuje, zasadniczo wody nie ma. Tutaj woda jest osobno oznaczona tam, gdzie jest. Reszta być może kiedyś zostanie zalana, a być może nigdy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
yzal (2021-09-09 14:17:33+00:00): Dobrý deň, značka "name" sa používa pre oficiálne pomenovanie daného objektu, ktorý je zvyčajne na nejakej tabuli (napr. názov ulice, obchodu a pod.) Do značky nepatrí jeho opis (napr. to že sa jedná o kríž, novinový stánok a pod.), to vyjadrujú iné značky.
*Martin* (2021-09-19 10:55:41+00:00): Naviac amenity=place_of_worship vyjadruje, ze sa tam konaju bohosluzby. To naozaj, takto na krizovatke?
yzal (2021-09-21 12:12:17+00:00): place_of_worship tam bolo pridané pred 11 rokmi
*Martin* (2021-09-21 12:16:26+00:00): potom sorry
*Martin* (2021-09-21 12:17:24+00:00): tak potom len prosim odstrante ten nazov
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:18:13+00:00): Wycofane.
maraf24 (2022-02-11 14:12:26+00:00): Te nazwy są na budynkach lub są znane?
Bo jeśli nie, to powinny być w old_name:de
wkdgs (2021-09-08 11:53:04+00:00): Hallo,

in OpenStreetMap sollen durchaus auch private Wege gemappt werden. Ich habe den Weg daher wieder hinzugefügt und als private Grundstückszufahrt markiert.

LG
winkeldings
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:31:05+00:00): Wycofane.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:31:45+00:00): Obiekt był prawidłowy.
luiswoo (2021-09-08 15:52:52+00:00): Мил человек, то, что это проезд, который обозначается как служебная, в СНТ вот совсем не смущает, да?
2GarinZmei (2021-09-09 11:26:27+00:00): Там нет проезда по факту, там по хорошему, только на тракторах или пешком, это точно не служебная дорога.
luiswoo (2021-09-09 21:36:04+00:00): По наличию домов, треков (strava, yandex), по заезженной дороге на снимке — тут очень часто ездят трактора и ходят пешеходы.
DUGA (2022-03-26 23:26:42+00:00): My suggestion is to not map them:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980864007#map=19/39.19705/-76.61319

Adding bunch of roads underneath the roof sounds cool, but your GPS will not always work as expected.
pmarkina_lyft (2022-03-28 15:37:29+00:00): Hi, DUGA!
My name is Polina and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this and for your suggestion. Let me assure you that although we use OSM for navigation mainly, the major criteria for our edits is always generally accepted practices in OSM, not the compliance with our GPS. In OSM, we try to reflect reality as correctly as possible, so I added all the passages at the gas station. Right now our localization system is working fine at such gas stations. However we will closely monitor its behavior here in the future.
I also agree that the number of passages under the roof can be represented with other ways, for example in lanes tag for less roads mapped. If you have any information about the best practices or discussions regarding such roads at the gas stations, we will be happy to learn more about them.
Best regards, Polina
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:32:26+00:00): Wycofane.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:33:08+00:00): Wycofane.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:33:53+00:00): Wycofane.
Frans S (2021-09-14 10:23:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please map from the Mapbox imagery. Bind which you used is outdated. Only to be used as reference. New buildings after 2006 are not visible
Best regards
rocky2109 (2021-09-08 10:26:22+00:00): source: Bing aerial imagery; Mapillary Images
eggie (2021-09-08 12:43:59+00:00): Dag Hulsbosch
Je kunt het best de naam van de school toevoegen aan de adresnode en het overschot aan namen verwijderen.
1x vermelden is genoeg.
Op het vlak kun je toevoegen landuse=education. Amenity=school kun je voor de rendering laten staan.
 Kijk je nog even?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2021-09-09 08:57:38+00:00): Alle info verplaatst naar adresnode nr 1.
MVG
eggie
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:34:32+00:00): Wycofane.
Frans S (2021-09-11 12:58:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please pay more attention on accurate mapping and squaring of the buildings. Please do not include a shadow of the building into your mapping.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:35:20+00:00): Wycofane.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 20:35:31+00:00): Wszystkie jezdnie Częstochowskiej tutaj mają taką samą kategorię.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
osmviborg (2021-09-08 11:14:30+00:00): Hej. Jeg kan ikke finde noget i OSM wiki'en der relaterer til det du har lavet her. Gider du redegør for dine ændringssæt?
b-holdet (2021-09-09 04:31:34+00:00): Ser ud som et projekt for mindfulness

https://sn.dk/Heden/Vibevadgaard--en-frugtplantage-med-yoga-mindfulness-og-forskning/artikel/706559
osmviborg (2021-09-09 05:35:46+00:00): Sandsynligvis, men projektet må finde en anden platform til deres optegnelser, OSM er ikke stedet.
b-holdet (2021-09-09 07:09:16+00:00): Helt enig :)
Jeg fandt blot en mulig baggrund for at brugeren valgte at lægge det ind.

Så de skal vel bare fjernes igen for jeg tror ikke brugeren vender tilbage.
sfensfen (2021-09-09 07:42:05+00:00): Bara slet det. Min første gang med OSM og jeg have lige brug for at dele nogle punkter. Det er til et projekt og kan bare slettes.
Undskyld besværet.
osmviborg (2021-09-09 07:50:49+00:00): Ingen besvær. Tak fordi du svarede.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
Hanan Tikveša (2021-09-08 10:46:49+00:00): Create EACH changeset for EACH place.
Adrianlzt (2021-09-08 15:21:45+00:00): My bad. There were changes not committed. I have undo the changeset and created one for each change
SekeRob (2021-09-08 15:46:27+00:00): Hi

Be sure that if the commits are valid there is no point in reversing. The BBB (Big Bound Box) was created. All the reversal does, in the same set, is to create yet another BBB.

Note that some edit tools will conflate sequential edits even when saved. The Osmose editor is a bad one. Save with relevant comment, move one Save an edit with different comment and you end up with the combination in one CS only showing the comment of the last save. If I do I just keep a copy of the previous save comment and expand on the next. Hair pulling event, but generally I avoid the use of that one. Street complete is slightly different. I combines saved edits of the same tag type. Do 2 different ones, e.g. a bus stop and a Xwalk on the other side of the country and you get 2 different CSs. These are the 2 that spring to mind. There could be more.

ciao
osmviborg (2021-09-08 11:17:50+00:00): Nu du er i gang med navngivning, gider du stave Bæk med stort forbogstav? Gælder alle delte navne.
-io- (2021-09-09 07:52:39+00:00): Не согласен с понижением статуса большинства проездов, которые являются внутриквартальными "проездами по прилегающей территории", а не "подъездными к зданию"
iWowik (2021-09-09 11:28:56+00:00): там не srvice=driveway полезнее было бь проставить, а living_street=yes
Mikhail Kruglov (2021-09-10 04:26:02+00:00): Статус поставил как "проезды", потому что изначально числились как служебные дороги.
-io- (2021-09-10 05:43:10+00:00): Они как были highway=service, так и остались. Вы просто добавили уточнение service=driveway. 
На странице https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dservice приведены примеры использований таких уточнений. Первый вариант (без уточнений) подходит лучше всего
-io- (2021-09-10 12:44:16+00:00): В общем, если ни у кого нет возражений, я приведу вид проездов ближайших кварталов обратно к надлежащему виду.
eggie (2021-09-08 12:38:06+00:00): Hoi.. Dit is niet correct..en zal niets doen in osm.

oneway=yes
Met
 oneway:bicycle=no

En evt ook voor moped en mofa..
Kijk je nog even?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2021-09-09 08:20:25+00:00): De wegrichting omgedraaid. oneway=yes toegevoegd plus oneway:bicycle=no

Je had oneway=bicycle=no
oneway:bicycle is de sleutel en no is de waarde

MVG
eggie

ps Weet je zeker dat er een uitzondering is voor fietsers?  Is er een onderbord die dat aangeeft?
Pyronick (2021-09-09 12:06:11+00:00): Hi eggie,

Excuus voor de trage reactie! Vanaf de zuidzijde staat er een drietal borden, van boven naar beneden: een gesloten verklaring C7, eenrichtingsweg C03, onderbord OB52 (uitgezonderd fietsers).

Vanaf de noordzijde staat er een verbodsbord C2 met daaronder OB52.
eggie (2021-09-09 12:17:27+00:00): Oke.. c7 is dat verboden voor vrachtauto s. Dan zou hgv=no erbij kunnen voor zover je dat nog niet hebt gedaan. 
De eenrichting zal nu goed zijn..
Mvg
Eggie
Pyronick (2021-09-09 14:56:06+00:00): Hi eggie,

Zoals ik het begrijp is het verboden voor alle motorvoertuigen (C2) (uitgezonderd fietsers) vanaf de Ring, en verboden voor vrachtverkeer (C7) vanaf de Hofkeslaan. Ik denk dat het onderbord uitgezonderd fietsers daar slaat op het eenrichtingsverkeer zodat er tegenliggers in de vorm van fietsers verwacht kan worden. Ik zal het aanpassen zodra ik thuis ben.

Overigens zag ik ook dat er een bord C4 (eenrichtingsverkeer) aan de kopse kant (noordzijde) van de T-splitsing Ring-Ring staat. Dit zal ik dan ook meteen meepakken.

mvg,
Pyronick
eggie (2021-09-09 15:16:00+00:00): Ingewikkeld stukje... 😀
Wanneer het geen eenrichting is dan zul je motor_vehicle met forward en/of backward moeten aangeven..
Oneway:bicycle=no hoeft dan weer niet.
Je kunt ook even hulp vragen op het forum. Ben even computerloos onderweg.
Succes
Eggie
Frans S (2021-09-13 10:19:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate and not oversized mapping.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110912000
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
TZorn (2021-09-09 09:05:58+00:00): Hallo Shephirt. Ich kann nicht ganz glauben, dass dieser Weg um die Villa herum nicht existieren soll. Jetzt enden mehrere andere Wege einfach als Sackgasse. Auf den Luftbildern ist  auch eindeutig Weg zu erkennen. Kannst du das bitte noch mal korrigieren.
Shephirt (2021-09-09 10:12:32+00:00): Hallo Tzorn,

Ich wohne in unmittelbarer Nachbarschaft. Ich werde heute im laufe des Tages GPSTracks aufzeichnen um den Wegverlauf zu korrigieren
vulasala (2021-09-09 05:46:30+00:00): Hi monica_panciu,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the highway tag for way 980886425 from skip to service. 
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110912503
Tomasz Rmn (2021-09-08 11:22:28+00:00): Od 08.09.2021 ulica Jana Matejki na odcinku łączącym ulicę Kraszewskiego z ulicą Sienkiewicza będzie dwukierunkowa. Zmiana organizacji ruchu ma związek z pracami prowadzonymi w obrębie skrzyżowania ulicy Kraszewskiego z ulicą Głowackiego, które zostanie zamknięte. Zmiana ta umożliwi dojazd do okolicznych nieruchomości.
DressyPear4 (2021-09-08 11:51:28+00:00): Olá, não adicione highway em ferrovia, veículos não podem trafegar sobre ela.
Nos cruzamentos com vias use tag como esse exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4742857860/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110913175
MxxCon (2021-09-09 02:03:31+00:00): Hello.
Please note that writing "-" as your changeset comment doesn't help other mappers understand what you are trying to edit. A more detailed explanation would be greatly appreciated. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more details.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110913266
DressyPear4 (2021-09-08 11:37:11+00:00): Olá, se o tráfego da via flui em ambos os sentidos considere colocar duas faixas, mesmo que a via for estreita.
Adicione um comentário nas suas edições
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110913319
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
jslawin2 (2021-09-18 15:43:55+00:00): After commissioning: iD 2.20.1, Orthophoto (2016–2018), 1: 5000, Latvia
The antivirus displays the message:

Threat neutralized
We broke the connection safely
with the website lvmgeoserver.lvm.lv
because it was infected by
URL: Blacklist
Frans S (2021-09-13 14:50:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Squaring buildings.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110914637
plankartierenVERBOTEN (2023-05-06 17:01:14+00:00): Hallo, hast Du einen Beleg für den Namen dieses Hügels? Schöne Grüße, PKV
ste (2023-05-06 18:44:21+00:00): Ist eigentlich nur ein selbsternannter Gipfel zu Ehren eines Hundes der anscheinend hier immer raufgegangen ist.
Frans S (2021-09-11 13:00:42+00:00): Hello. Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2 Thanks for mapping
Frans S (2021-09-11 10:47:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please use the correct imagery. Maxar !
Best regards
Frans S (2021-09-11 10:02:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Frans S (2021-09-14 10:52:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Be more precise and square the buildings you map
Traces where no shadow is visible is mostly not a building. The shadow proofs that it is above groundlevel. You mapped here several vaque traces as a building. I removed them

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110916482
Frans S (2021-09-11 10:05:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Frans S (2021-09-13 15:01:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. 
please do not use the Bing imagery for mapping. Just for double check.
Bing is outdated and don't show newer buildings. Buildings might be demolisched as well and not visible on Mapbox, like these 2 buildings
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-09-13 10:31:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate and square mapping

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110917087
PT-53 (2021-09-09 07:11:30+00:00): Hallo madnikhi,
da
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980922995/history
fehlt noch ein
access=privat

Dort
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9073790914/history
soll ein Tor sein. Ich kann auf keinem der Luftbilder dort ein Tor sehen.

Grüße