piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Aleksa M (2022-03-05 12:57:56+00:00): 1. Nije imala ni pre unet broj https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8066495289/history, a nisam ga našao ni na BG prevozu.
2. Tako ispada kad se protumači cela karta nove organizacije koju su dali.
3. Sad ni ja nisam siguran jer stvarno tako kaže u tekstu, a karta pokazuje drugačije. Moguće da je greška u tekstu jer je pre rekonstrukcije 36 išla celom Savskom.
Branko Kokanovic (2022-03-20 18:12:53+00:00): Heja, mozes li da pogledas GTFS od 18.03. - https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/RS/single-trip.php?feed=RS-00-BGPREVOZ&release_date=&trip_id=684675. Kao da 511 u smeru Sremcica=>beograd na vodi ide kroz Savsku, a ne kroz Sarajevsku? Ovo su im najnovji podaci, sta mislis, da li ima smisla da menjamo? Isti vazi i za 51, 36, 601...? Ako nisi siguran, mogu ja da se provozam jedan dan sledece nedelje?
Aleksa M (2022-03-20 18:39:10+00:00): Da, definitivno sve idu Savskom i po onoj njihovoj karti.
Branko Kokanovic (2022-03-20 19:36:12+00:00): Super onda, menjam sve te linije po GTFS-u danas/sutra!:)
Branko Kokanovic (2022-07-20 17:47:41+00:00): Vidim da si hteo da budes od koristi i vidim da si uradio mnogo lepih izmena na Kopaoniku (nadam se da si se i lepo proveo, koliko je to moguce ovih godina na Kopaoniku:D), ali trudi se da ne internalacionalizujes imena jer zvanicno ime treba da bude na cirilici. OsmAnd moze valjda da prebaci u latinicu, a mozes da menjas name:sr-Latn ili name:en (ili name:hr ili name:sh...)

Hvala!
jeslop (2022-03-04 08:37:03+00:00): Saludos mergg98.

¿Podrías explicar la razón del borrado de todos estos datos? He revertido el cambio a la espera de tu explicación, ya que has eliminado calles completas. 

Para iniciarte en OSM te recomiendo leer esto primero: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-03-12 08:58:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036999119. What is the meaning of the tags
CCT T,V = 15EES0762X
CCT T.M = 15EES0141Q
MxxCon (2022-03-04 00:53:50+00:00): Please note that "fixme" tag is not intended for city government or whoever to come out there and fix the stairs. It is intended as a message for other mappers to address whatever issue you can't map at this point in time.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118073902
user_5359 (2022-03-08 09:23:45+00:00): Hello! I correct you typo on your maker node (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9553139222/history). But notice the substance is part of the pipeline information not of the marker.
user_5359 (2022-03-08 09:14:23+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400474884. What is the meaning of the tags
CCT T.M = 15EES1100X
CCT T.V = 15EES1500T
?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-04 00:42:27+00:00): 117993671 117993367 117993104 117992233 117992170 117991952 117991796 117990998 117990767 117987477 117986975 117986781 117986685 117986380 117986071 117985933 117985703 117985498 117985284 117984869
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-04 00:43:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5585
omarsoukane 
bob2000
jodie1974
munger2002
barry_fortnite_2002
adam2011
larry_2002
noa2003
omarsouk
larson1974
adams22052003
daisy_2014
magic 2001
VLLLVI (2022-03-04 00:54:23+00:00): Miglioramento linea elettrica 23.669; Aggiunti alcuni edifici e corretti alcuni percorsi
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-09 22:41:42+00:00): This relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13839427 is missing the outer portion
Kuatsystems (2022-03-09 23:09:36+00:00): thanks!  i have been trying to figure that out
blendergeek (2022-07-16 15:01:16+00:00): I have undone part of this changeset as the old Macy's on the southwest side of River Ridge Mall was bulldozed more than a year ago.
OptikalCrow (2022-07-16 21:10:23+00:00): Thanks, I don't go to the mall often so I didn't know. If you come across something like that, it's helpful to leave an untagged element with a note on it so that people don't re-add things that are still visible on aerial imagery.
Rajev (2022-03-05 23:50:03+00:00): My god what horror, I have the impression that you write poems or verses from the Koran
Rajev (2022-03-05 00:35:33+00:00): Congratulations on your new account, apparently you have a good command of OSM and JOSM
My question why you dropped your old account and each time you create a new account
Please how many OSM account do you have?
the last time I told you why you are replacing EN names with UR names, and are you closer to the Pakistani OSM community, and no response from you
I find your changes horrible, you are wasting your time!!
nevw (2022-03-04 11:26:58+00:00): Hi
If you change the imagery to use Maxar you will see the new carparks.
nevw (2022-03-11 10:00:09+00:00): I remotely mapped what is visible using Maxar imagery.
Edd5 (2022-03-11 10:02:20+00:00): Looks much better than what I had done. Many thanks.
nevw (2022-03-11 11:12:35+00:00): Thanks, I wanted to map the footways but found them too indistinct in Maxar imagery.
nevw (2022-03-04 02:54:54+00:00): Hi
I updated the phone format to the correct format
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Mobile_Phones_.28Cell_Phones.29
rjgambrel (2022-08-13 21:24:58+00:00): David, The section of trunk that you added expressway tags to doesn't seem to meet the US def of expressway which is a "slightly degraded" from motorway standards. In this stretch there are two at grade intersections 480th and 490th that I think break "slightly" Let me know or bring up in the slack channel for wider discussion. If you are OK with reverting I will do the changes. I am finding a lot of expressway classifications. Most of the folks don't know about our wiki. I know you do and have been involved in the discussions.
Your Village Maps (2022-08-13 21:32:31+00:00): This should definitely have the expressway=yes tag. I'm surprised you'd even question it, honestly. I don't know what else to say....
rjgambrel (2022-08-13 23:37:58+00:00): The reason I questioned is the two at grade intersections. I understand that there is a plan to achieve full motorway or expressway by a certain date, but that date isn't here yet. I can only map what I see on the ground, not what the plan is. I will defer to your better judgement on this. I may open up a slack discussion about this so others can weigh in as well. The "process" is to have discussion and come to consensus. You are a very responsible mapper so I know you understand that. There is another mapper I am dealing with now that doesn't seem to engage. If I bring this up in slack it is just to provide the opening to others so it is a coummunity decision. Do not take offense! And thanks for all your contributions! I see them all over Minnesota (starting with my first contact with you near ALexandria.
Your Village Maps (2022-08-14 01:26:09+00:00): Well, it's just one tag and one without much consequence. I'm not sure when this short bit between actual motorway will be upgraded. I heard they want to build a new interchange on the north side of Pine Island or maybe at 500th Street (I think a 1/2 interchange based on the old at-grade crossing would make more sense). By the way, MnDOT considers US 52 between Pine Island and MN 55 East to be an expressway - their definition. They also refer to it and many others as Trunk Highways (TH 52, etc.). It's also considered a "super commuter" which I think describes how much of the traffic uses it - in *both* directions, to Rochester and to the Cities.
rjgambrel (2022-08-14 20:24:53+00:00): As I think I mentioned there are a number of mappers (myself included) who have jumped onto this new tag and are using it in various different ways. I tried to stop thinking about this for awhile, but am now ready to jump in. I will be putting something together for the channel in the next few days (maybe today?). I believe the guidance is vague and think it can be sharpened up if we can reach a consensus. I will do some research and lay out some facts pointing to a few segments around the state including one of yours. Like the motorway island discussion I will be asking folks which segments they think should have expressway=yes and why. Am hopeful that through the discussion we can reach some reasonable consensus. Easier now than a year from now I think. While it is just one tag, a lot of time has been devoted in US highway classification and americana map discussing it. In the end, whether it renders as if it is not there or if it renders differently it is probably best that we try to make it consistent. Thank you again for your engaging in this discussion.
Your Village Maps (2022-08-14 21:33:11+00:00): I would just simply say that all "motorway islands" should have the tag expressway=yes UNLESS the road also loses its dual carriageway 4-lane divided highway characteristics.
GOwin (2022-03-05 01:45:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions.

If you're keen to know more about mapping, check out the following free resources:
* Beginner's Mapping guide - https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
* Intermediate/Advanced self-paced learning modules - https://learnosm.org
* Local mappers - https://osm.org/wiki/PH

The most interactive channel for local mappers is their Telegram channel: https://t.me/OSMph

Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions. 

If you're keen to know more about mapping, check out the following free resources:

 ∙ Beginner's Mapping guide - https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide 
∙ Intermediate/Advanced self-paced learning modules - https://learnosm.org 
 ∙ Local mappers - https://osm.org/wiki/PH 

 The most interactive channel for local mappers is their Telegram channel: https://t.me/OSMph
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:18:40+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
nevw (2022-03-04 11:09:36+00:00): Hi
why is the river waterway distance tag used and value means ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:river:waterway%20distance?uselang=en-GB
To get the island to render properly it would need to be added as an inner to local river relation. I am unable to check that now.
nevw (2022-03-05 06:06:20+00:00): Hi
I remapped this and nearby islands using Bing imagery and added the island/islets as inners to the river multipolygon relations. It should render on the OSM in a few days, earlier if you use the Tor browser.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:18:09+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-27 19:53:06+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة
seattlefyi (2022-03-04 04:41:43+00:00): Hi, it looks like you may have accidentally removed the building tag from the Ale House, I’ve already put it back, but feel free to let me know if it turns out you meant to do that. Thanks!
toidiu (2022-03-04 08:02:17+00:00): Thought I was selecting a bar not the building. Thanks for correcting it!
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:17:00+00:00): This is not a printed map, or a `nautral=` feature. Don't put it towards the old coastline.
pkoby (2022-03-04 20:30:01+00:00): Looks like you dragged Jerry's Automotive south. Appears to be an accident?
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-03-04 22:43:34+00:00): That was an accident yes, didn't realize I had done that. Thanks for catching it
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-03-04 22:43:45+00:00): (Fixed now)
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:15:20+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:14:49+00:00): Please don't add "new village" or similar if it is not used in the proper name. This is clearlyt defined in Hong Kong.  Put it in `description:en=`, and use proper tags to express that it is moved. 
N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:39:53+00:00): * Don't remove the short name.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:41:01+00:00): Don't pretend you are adding `official_name=`.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:13:24+00:00): `place=suburb` is a "major area" "with a distinct and recognised local name and identity.", not what you think should be top-level. 
N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:12:10+00:00): `place=suburb` is a "major area" "with a distinct and recognised local name and identity.", not what you think should be top-level. 
N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong).
h551w (2022-03-05 06:27:01+00:00): This changeset should have been titled something like "Adding Stoddard Pathway extension" but I think I walked away and after I came back I forgot I hadn't uploaded that yet before noticing the road segment classification
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:10:35+00:00): `place=` should be put in the sociocultural center., not geographic center.
tastrax (2022-03-08 03:54:14+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:09:48+00:00): This is not a duplicate. Sha Tin Town Centre has various definitions, as small as the Town Hall area, as big as the entire surroundings.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 10:41:39+00:00): Please don't add generic names or descriptor labels in `name=` (proper names only). Use `description:en=` + `description:zh=`.
pza (2022-03-07 03:13:43+00:00): The NSW Base map has this as Bayview St, while the council web site suggests it's Gottenham St.  On OSM we are meant to go by what is "on the ground", which I guess is the street signs... Bayview St.
MattSund (2022-03-07 03:59:29+00:00): Hi pza. This is regarding the part between Marlborough and Allum Place (which is also spelled wrong)/ I have asked the NSW basemap to be updated so you should see that soon. And I have ordered a new street name plate to be attached soon. The council website is updated because I edited it the same day I submitted this.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 10:40:53+00:00): 1. Please don't add `highway=` directly.
2. `=motorway_junction` is for numbered exits on Strategic Route only.
AWX4 (2022-03-11 07:48:36+00:00): Learnt that. Thx
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 11:07:33+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` is the common name in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong).
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-13 15:31:35+00:00): aqui voce removeu vários footway, sobre a praça do relogio e uma que ligava o banco do brasil. porque fez isto?
PH_ (2022-03-15 03:25:21+00:00): Devido as obras na Praça do Relógio e aos arredores, as pistas de veículos bem como o caminho de pedestres estão sofrendo alterações e desvios, as informações aqui estavam incorretas e/ou desatualizadas.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-21 22:25:02+00:00): Aqui também você havia definido um trecho da Comercial como serviço, acho que não cabia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264456207 de qualquer forma hoje ja passei pra secundaria
PH_ (2022-04-21 22:51:57+00:00): Esse trecho estava restrito para veículos ligados as obras do túnel de Taguatinga, inclusive, a liberação do mesmo ao público só ocorreu na data de hoje 21/04/2022, conforme no link abaixo onde órgãos oficiais como o Governo do Distrito Federal e o SEMOB informaram.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=360736302765641&id=100064878210749
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-09 00:33:06+00:00): a avenida central não estava liberada para veículos, você deioxou como service, isso permitiria que serviços de roteamento sugerissem esta rota, mudei para construction novamente, talvez o máximo que caberia seria footway se a passagem de pedestres estiver liberada!
RussNelson (2022-08-01 02:23:48+00:00): Why add native American names to name= when they are not used in or by the city? They are not the common names of those places.
ke9tv (2022-08-01 03:57:58+00:00): I chose to include Haudenosaunee toponyms, where I had them, on places
enclosed by the Six Nations' land claims that remain alive in the
current era.  Those include
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13737250 - where the Oneida
still retain a degree of sovereignty over any land to which they hold
title.  (The 2013 settlement agreement is complex.)

Oneida is the only city or town of any size for which this might cause
confusion, I think, and I wouldn't kick too hard if you wanted to
downgrade `name` (as long as `name:one` is retained.)

The other communities that are affected either are Haudenosaunee
settlements (as with the bunch of hamlets that you'll see near
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/42.5344/-78.9940), communities
adjacent to the reservations that the nations specifically wanted
listed bilingually (e.g. Gowanda, Irving, Taylor Hollow, Versailles),
or communities that one of the nations owns outright. City of
Salamanca, for instance, despite being 90+% White, stands on land
owned by the Seneca nation - the residents are all renters!  Given
that status, it's arguable that Onë꞉dagö꞉h _is_ the official name.

An increasing number of communities are starting to have their
Haudenosaunee names appear on the NY DOT signs, such as
https://image.advance.net/home/adv-media/width2048/img/newyorkupstatecom_national_desk_blog/photo/2016/10/24/seneca-signjpg-584c5b2882aa5f13.jpg
If the highway signs give "ohi꞉yoʾ" as the name of Town of Allegany,
that sounds fairly official to me. (But did they really need to
put it in Comic Sans?)
RussNelson (2022-08-01 12:28:37+00:00): Oh, I didn't know about Oneida land claims. Fair enough. And yes, Salamanca might also be double-named because it *is* outright on the rez.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-04 10:42:47+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels in `name=` as "development", "construction", etc.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:45:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:45:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Allison P (2022-09-04 19:10:20+00:00): Check addr:state, should be UT
user_5359 (2022-03-08 06:20:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the key healthcare_facility:MG?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-13 15:32:41+00:00): aqui voce removeu os footway que existem dentro do peninsula, porque fez isto?
PH_ (2022-03-15 03:21:00+00:00): As informações estavam sem precisão e havia divergências da área do Península.
Zian Choy (2022-03-04 05:32:09+00:00): See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-04 10:34:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118087334 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some vandalism in Russia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5736 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-04 10:34:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118087334 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some vandalism in Russia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5736 .
mavl (2022-05-20 15:45:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:45:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-04 10:34:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118087334 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some vandalism in Russia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5736 .
SHARCRASH (2022-03-04 13:36:03+00:00): Bonjour! A propos de ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014931402 Pourquoi l'avez vous changé en highway=pedestrian dont le tag est normalement est assigné sur des chemins piétonniers très larges, typiquement une rue piétonne dans une zone urbaine, ou grands parcs, etc.

Ensuite vous avez changé la surface en concrete mais laissé le tracktype=grade4. Du coup, ne faudrait-il pas l'enlever?

Enfin, perso je n'ai pas vu l'état actuel de ce chemin, uniquement il y a quelques mois coté Messancy. Vu que le chemin longe les champs est-ce qu'il ne serait pas partagé avec les agriculteurs pour l'accès à leurs parcelles?
rjgambrel (2022-08-13 21:28:04+00:00): This changeset has a section with even more at grade intersections. I believe it is not expressway. Let me know your thoughts.
Your Village Maps (2022-08-13 21:37:55+00:00): I definitely believe that this section also should have expressway=yes. Keep in mind that it is also becoming more and more like a motorway. In fact, the stretch from Maple Way (near County 1 Boulevard) to about 415th Street (near County 50 Boulevard) is having ALL at-grade intersections removed as part of the current US 52 rebuild project, on top of the new interchange at the north end of MN 57 (Hader). I think there might be a few private driveways remaining when they are done in 2023. So pretty much a motorway at that point, although that's debatable, but definitely expressway at least.
Your Village Maps (2022-08-13 21:39:47+00:00): ...and the goal (part of MnDOT's "Toward Zero Deaths" program) is for the entirety of US 52 between I-90 and I-94 to be up to Interstate standards by no later than 2035.