piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chillly (2017-03-18 21:49:19+00:00): You added the pond OK, but it is not in a 'hole' in the wood. As I said before, multipolygon editing is not as straightforward as simple editing. 

To add new nodes to an existing polygon, select the polygon. click and drag one of the centre markers between two existing nodes. The marker will become a new node, which you can drag to where you want it. You can repeat this as much as you need. To delete a node select it (not the polygon) and click the bin symbol.

Would you like me to create the MP?
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 21:52:06+00:00): How do you make a hole? Thanks for the new nodes info. What's an MP?
chillly (2017-03-18 21:57:18+00:00): MP=multipolygon.

In the online editor you are using you select both the wood and the pond (use shift click to select the second item). Then the ring menu has a plus (+) sign which is merge. Click that. That merges the two polygons as a multipolygon, thus making the pond into a hole in the wood. It also moves the tags from the wood to the multipolygon relation as it needs to be. 

A multipolygon can have many 'holes' in it, just select all the inner things and the outer thing and merge (+). In fact it can be even more complex than that, but I would use a different editor to do complex stuff.
chillly (2017-03-18 20:24:03+00:00): Hmmm, would a deciduous wood really be called The Firs? Where are you getting these names from?
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 21:28:25+00:00): It is deciduous now. It was actually a Norway Spruce and European Larch plantation with some site-native broadleaved. So granted it should never have been called the Firs, but that's its name. Its quite common for people to refer to conifers as firs, but there are no native firs to the UK. Only plantations, mainly Sitka Spruce on the Atlantic coasts of Wales and NW Scotland. Certainly not common in Herfordshire, where we may get some Douglas Fir in places, but always as planted trees as they are from the US. Anyway, this woodland is known as 'The Firs', although now its mainly ash, oak, some hornbeam, field maple, elms and hawthorn. So it is a historic name from when it was first planted.
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 21:35:37+00:00): I work for the Woodland Trust as a project manager for ancient woodland restoration covering the SE and E of England. My work is all to do with converting ancient woodlands planted with non-native conifers to site-native broadleaf species. Here's a link to a guide to what I do that I wrote with a couple of colleagues if you would like to know more https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/publications/2015/12/ancient-woodland-restoration/
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 21:40:49+00:00): So do you need proof of what people are putting on OSM, how does it work. Do you do a certain amount of background checking to ensure it is not nonsense? Or does it really on the collective weight of many people to find and correct errors?
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 21:41:22+00:00): Excuse typos.
chillly (2017-03-18 21:44:00+00:00): We generally accept most stuff, but lately there's been a lot of junk stuff added by people trying to cheat at a game that uses OSM as it's map source. It is clear now that your edits are real and useful, sorry for the skepticism.
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 21:49:36+00:00): That's ok. It is Saturday night after all, so I would be suspicious too
chillly (2017-03-18 20:29:07+00:00): Thanks for the detail. You have chosen a slightly advanced thing to edit, that is an object inside an object. We use an advanced object called a relation to draw the lake with a hole (the island) in it. 

What you have done is useful, would you like a hand incorporating the island with the lake?
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 20:42:49+00:00): Yes, ok. Thanks
chillly (2017-03-18 20:51:22+00:00): I've joined the lake and island in a multipolygon relation. I removed the address fields, they are only used for buildings. The tags on the lake have moved to the relation, as is the norm.
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 21:01:40+00:00): ok, got it.
chillly (2017-03-18 20:40:28+00:00): Hi, 
You would be better to space the postcode as normal, SG9 0HF. If some uses the map data to search for a place, using postcodes is common, such as in a sat-nav. Badly spaced postcodes don't work
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 20:44:46+00:00): Ok, what's normal? without the space then? I normally put a space, but then I accept I am not a SatNav. At least not knowingly.
chillly (2017-03-18 20:48:12+00:00): You have entered it without a space. It would normally have a space before the last three digits. I know more about postcodes than is good for me, I maintain the UK postcode layer for OSM. http://codepoint.raggedred.net
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 20:56:44+00:00): You are quite right. I had to check by starting to add another building. That's quite unusual for me, it was a typo. I normally put a space in, hence my first comment. I ocd-hate postcodes without spaces
chillly (2017-03-18 20:58:34+00:00): Everyone starting out makes mistakes. The great thing is everything can be changed and improved. 

I hope you enjoy seeing your work for everyone else to see. If you need any help, feel free to send a message.
Chris
Martin Hügi (2017-03-18 21:02:13+00:00): Thanks
user_2842609 (2017-03-31 20:13:49+00:00): Merci de lire http://learnosm.org/
Vous avez effectué des modifications sans respecter ni lire la documentation.
Toutes vos modifications sont à refaire.
literan (2017-03-19 13:57:53+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вы делаете лишнюю работу - адреса на POI вешать необязательно. Программы и навигаторы берут их из контура здания (а POI нужно помещать внутрь контура)
user_2842609 (2017-03-31 20:13:38+00:00): Merci de lire http://learnosm.org/
Vous avez effectué des modifications sans respecter ni lire la documentation.
Toutes vos modifications sont à refaire.
naoliv (2017-11-30 13:53:36+00:00): Moraes, essa faixa prioritária que você mapeou https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476119876 existe alguma separação (com algum tipo de canteiro ou meio-fio) da outra via ou é apenas uma faixa mesmo?
moraes19 (2017-11-30 18:40:41+00:00): naoliv.
Existe uma barreira de Corrente ao longo da Via. Não saberia informar se existe em alguma trecho algum pequeno Canteiro.
naoliv (2017-11-30 18:49:33+00:00): Certo.
Depois eu traço essa corrente que separa os lados.
Andreas Binder (2017-03-18 21:56:32+00:00): Zusätzliche Quelle: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/919822
eggie (2017-03-19 08:49:18+00:00): revert due to pokemon vandalism
eggie (2017-03-19 22:34:49+00:00): replaced  info to addressnode
Peter Dobratz (2017-03-23 15:01:38+00:00): Greenways should not be tagged as highway=living_street.

Rather than changing the highway tag on the Way objects for the roads, look at tags like sidewalk=* and cycleway=lane where sidewalks and bike lanes exist as part of the road.

The Greenway designation should probably best be captured with a bicycle route relation.  For editing relations, it's best to use JOSM instead of iD.

Living Street is a concept that is mainly used in Europe for residential streets where pedestrians and cars share the road.  In order to be safe, the speed limit is typically "walking speed" or about 3 mph.  Most minor roads in the USA have speed limits between 20 and 30 mph so would not be characterized as a highway=living_street but rather highway=residential or highway=unclassified.
nvk (2017-03-23 16:51:32+00:00): Thanks for the background! Is this a case where tags (should) mean something slightly different from country to country (like how implied max speed is interpreted)? The highway=living_street tag was suggested to me by someone else commenting on another changeset, lol. The reason I like it is it should try and route cars around this street.

Tiffany Avenue is already part of a bicycle route relation – but that alone doesn't signify as almost all the bike related streets in San Francisco are already in relations so that isn't a meaningful indicator that this particular street has better biking than others nearby.

Tiffany has `cycleway=shared_lane` and John and I have also experimented with adding a `bicycle:designated=greenway` tag. Looking at Portland there are streets that aren't residential that are designated as part of a greenway so maybe this is the best (new) tag to use.
Peter Dobratz (2017-03-24 00:20:42+00:00): It makes sense that the router would tend to prefer other routes that don't go through highway=living_street as you would be required to drive really slowly on that section.  However, in reality there is no such restriction (apart from the fact that you are more likely to have to slow down to avoid hitting cyclists).
You seem to be making these edits all over including places not local to yourself.  Are you interfacing with local communities at all?  I'll post on the talk-us email list to get some more feedback.
I live in Portland, Oregon and I think the tag bicycle=designated has been use quite a bit on roads around here that some government agency has determined should be better for bicycles (as such they are often signed with a "Bike Route" sign).  However, bicycle=designated doesn't really say that cars should be discouraged from using the road at all.  Also, I think the "greenway" designation goes above and beyond the regular bike routes, but cars are still allowed on those roads and still allowed to drive up to the speed limit where conditions permit.  I could go along with adding a "bicycle:designated=greenway" to the roads.
nvk (2017-03-24 00:46:56+00:00): Thanks! Alternatively from bicycle:designated=greenway it could be bicycle=greenway (and bicycle=greenwave). But then we get into tagging for (older) renderer debates.

This GIST lists the OpenStreetMap tags the Mapzen bike map is using to display bike route colors: https://gist.github.com/nvkelso/fe46993c6c334b52c4b9d6cf5aabffa7

I'm making edits to places I live, have visited, or have done multi-source research – including official and unofficial local bike maps (print and online). I'm also making edits based on comments from locals in these areas saying the previous basic tagging didn't match their on-the-ground experience or expectations from a bike map.

The existing OSM wiki documented tags for bicycle needs to grow a bit to describe things like bike boulevards, greenwaves, and buffered_lanes. I'm happy to move the discussion along!
nvk (2017-03-24 01:28:25+00:00): (Replied some more in the us-talk thread.)
eggie (2017-03-19 08:49:06+00:00): revert due to pokemon vandalism
user_2842609 (2017-03-31 20:13:25+00:00): Merci de lire http://learnosm.org/
Vous avez effectué des modifications sans respecter ni lire la documentation.
Toutes vos modifications sont à refaire.
eggie (2017-03-19 08:48:58+00:00): revert due to pokemon vandalism
eggie (2017-03-19 08:48:48+00:00): revert due to pokemon vandalism
user_2842609 (2017-03-31 20:13:12+00:00): Merci de lire http://learnosm.org/
Vous avez effectué des modifications sans respecter ni lire la documentation.
Toutes vos modifications sont à refaire.
eggie (2017-03-19 08:48:27+00:00): revert due to pokemon vandalism
Geogast (2017-04-05 18:12:11+00:00): Olá! Nas Avenidas Vicente Rao e Jõao de Luca, o Corredor, ou seja: a faixa exclusiva de ônibus, não é separadas das outras faixas; é uma superficie só. — Neste caso, a wiki diz que não se deve desenhar ways separados (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways). — Seria correto trabalhar com tags. De fato, os ways existentes já tinham o tag bus:lanes=designated|...
AjBelnuovo (2017-04-05 18:37:51+00:00): E onde eu coloco os pontos de ônibus que circulam no corredor ?
Geogast (2017-04-05 18:41:00+00:00): public_transport=stop_position vão no way que representa toda a avenida (uma máo dela). e a plataforma vai no seu lugar, entre as duas mãos. Mais ou menos como aqui: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-23.60999/-46.66868
AjBelnuovo (2017-04-05 18:54:09+00:00): Corrigindo , ponto de ônibus , para os ônibus que circulam pelo corredor ?
Geogast (2017-04-05 19:00:28+00:00): Você diz: que way fazer parte da relação de ônibus? Também, o way que representa a mão da avenida. 
Assim é na Av. Diniz e Av. Ibirapuera, por exemplo.
o JOSM tem a função de exibir faixas exclusivas (bus:lanes=*); facilita muito trabalhar nisto.
AjBelnuovo (2017-04-06 00:10:18+00:00): E porque não fizeram este tipo de ação no corredor Inajar / Rio Branco / Centro ?
Geogast (2017-04-08 16:15:38+00:00): Não sei; não conheço a Avenida, nem mapeei lá. Você diz aqui: https://osm.org/go/M~zhp0Qh1--?
Olhe nesta foto: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=1-DXQ8Gg0PahMdUDgkVDXQ&lat=-23.500543055555557&lng=-46.68657305555555&z=17 (que foi tirada olhando ao sul): A izquerda tem uma via exclusiva para onibus que esta separada da via para carros (na margem da foto, à izq); isto, sem duvida tem que estar com um way proprio em OSM. Isto acho bem mapeado no momento. —  A direita, a faixa exclusiva não tem separação fisica das faixas para carros; então não deve ter um way proprio em OSM, mas um tag psv:lanes=designated||. Isto falta no momento, conforme eu conferi agora. — Ou vc diz em outro lugar?
Geogast (2017-04-08 16:27:39+00:00): Aliás, eu aproveitei que vc tinha colocado o tag surface=concrete na faixa exclusiva e colocei "surface:lanes=concrete|asphalt|...". Veja aqui: www.openstreetmap.org/way/258405446
AjBelnuovo (2017-04-10 13:17:02+00:00): Ok .Entendi a diferença ao ser mapeado .
AjBelnuovo (2017-04-12 13:46:29+00:00): Geogast , você poderia verificar http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-23.54623/-46.62226
A avenida Rangel Pestana só tem duas vias e não três , mas nesta segunda via , a esquerda ( sentido Sé - Brás ) tem uma ciclofaixa e entre esta ciclofaixa e faixa de rolamento tem uma faixa para estacionamento de veículos .
E no viaduto 25 de Março ( que ao meu ver está qualificada erroneamente como Expressa , já que tem semáforos em trechos curtos ) também tem uma ciclofaixa na direita e quando termina o viaduto a ciclofaixa cruza o viaduto indo para o lado esquerdo .
Geogast (2017-04-16 14:50:11+00:00): Olá! Uh, estos são casos mais complicados. Não tem imagens Mapillary em Av. Rangel Pestana; por isto não posso conferir bem. Faz uns meses passei por lá para mapear, e não lembro de nenhuma separação física entre as vias; mas teria que ver.
O da ciclofaixa também se pode taguear; mas nisto, não faço muito ideia. Aqui se explica o tag: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:cycleway 
Vou estar de viagem por um tempo; por isto não vou responder. Até mais! Daniel
eggie (2017-03-19 08:06:58+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-19 08:19:02+00:00): Je edits zijn niet helemaal gelukt. Er liepen wat paden door elkaar heen en je had een pedestrian (wandelgebied) helemaal rond de Bussemer- en Westerheide gemaakt.
Je ziet het nu nog renderen, maar dat zal wel verdwijnen.
Je kunt hier reageren.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46968222

Wat was je bedoeling hier?
eggie (2017-03-19 08:24:33+00:00): Nu het is "reverted" kan ik zien dat je van een multipolygoon dat heide is een wandelgebied had gemaakt.
Als beginner graag voral van die multipolygonen afblijven. Die zorgen ervoor dat je de stukken bos, gras en water  in het heidegebied kunt zien.
Probeer eens te beginnen met bankjes e.d. toe te voegen zodat je de editor een beetje gaat begrijpen.
Commodoortje (2017-03-19 18:00:35+00:00): Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve.
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
nevw (2017-03-19 00:33:39+00:00): Welcome to the Openstreetmap.org
You need to read more of the tutorial and add the correct tags for your edit to display.
Navarr Barnier (2017-03-18 23:14:15+00:00): Poor changelog (super my bad)

I spent a lot of time here just tagging some buildings, adding some pathways, adding the Liberty Playground, tagging the parking lots and adding the parking lot aisles, etc.
manoharuss (2017-03-20 11:35:38+00:00): Hi mjkab108,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to OSM are greatly appreciated. But this place does not look like a park from satellite imagery. Please make sure that you map what is existing on the ground. Deleting these.

Best,

Manohar
manoharuss (2017-03-20 12:27:40+00:00): Otherwise great mapping activity by the way. So awesome. Happy mapping.
pnorman (2023-05-29 04:05:16+00:00): Hi,
you set a few ways to highway=living_street. Living streets are a concept, that with a couple of rare exceptions, do not exist in the US. I've gone ahead and changed these, but I wanted you to be aware for future.
nvk (2023-05-30 14:07:39+00:00): Hey Paul, can you elaborate a bit more, please? This change set is 6 years old so it could be things have changed in Seattle since my tagging for sure. But especially during the pandemic these types of streets in the USA have become much more common. The OSM wiki even mentions Seattle by name. Is there a particular problem you’re trying to solve with the revert? _Nathaniel
pnorman (2023-06-01 07:42:13+00:00): It also mentions Tagging these as highway=living_street has been controversial because pedestrian-safe speed limits are not part of the initiative. The roads I looked at had speed limits of 20 mph or above, far above walking speed.
richlv (2017-03-25 23:03:12+00:00): hi there. this looked more like a bus stop than a station, so i changed it. please let me know if that was wrong :)
eggie (2017-03-19 08:27:40+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-19 08:34:29+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
mvexel (2017-03-20 19:16:15+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your edits! I made some more around the same area, I hope it's helpful. If you want to get in touch with other mappers, please join our Slack community at https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/. Friendly people there are happy to answer questions. Thanks again! 
Since you're editing in Utah and may be from there, let me also point you to OpenStreetMap Utah, a growing group of local mappers who sometimes get together: https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Utah/
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-08-13 14:02:45+00:00): Why is it "Cañon"? Street signs show "Canon"...
nereocystis (2020-08-13 15:26:33+00:00): The street signs near MacArthur do have a tilde. At least they did a few years ago. Are some street signs missing a tilde?
nereocystis (2020-08-13 15:29:03+00:00): Here is an image of a street sign with a tilde. You need to zoom in a bit. It isn't at a great angle, but it is barely visible
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gy93HD_jlDYyGiu1SIOvRw
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-08-13 16:27:03+00:00): Yes, the signs at Wellington Street have missing tilde. I was also comparing the street names with Alameda County address points -- addresses there are without tilde.

But signs at both MacArthur Boulevard and Veteran Way have tilde, so, I guess,  tilde should be there
nereocystis (2020-08-13 17:42:21+00:00): Yeah, I admit I don't know for sure. Perhaps Oakland has the official name, perhaps someone just painted the tilde after too many people called it Cannon.

I think I once noticed the lack of tilde at Wellington, and was curious, and then forgot about it.
j03lar50n (2017-03-19 16:01:00+00:00): Hello, are you certain this is a park? Does it have a name?
Hjart (2017-05-27 22:11:05+00:00): Er du enig i at Kulturbroen primært er en gangsti? (se https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49018502)
mikkolukas (2017-05-29 21:45:26+00:00): Ja det kan bestemt også ses sådan. Gangbroen er smal og selvom det er tilladt at cykle, så kræver det stadig gensidig hensyntagen.
Jeg vil sammenligne det med et fortov som det er tilladt at cykle på.
osmviborg (2017-05-30 09:13:09+00:00): "Kulturbro-Aalborg er en havnebro for gående og cyklister". (http://kulturbroaalborg.dk/) Er det ikke det samme som =bicycle=designated
foot=designated ?
mikkolukas (2017-06-02 09:13:37+00:00): Well, der har været kritik af at man overhovedet har tilladt cyklister på broen, fordi den er så smal.

Så vidt jeg fanger situationen, vil man gerne sælge broen til offentligheden som mere brugervenlig end den reelt er; at dens dimensioner ikke helt lever op til hvad man ville forvente af en kombineret gang- og cykelsti.

Hvis vi skal kortlægge efter "hvordan virkeligheden ser ud" frem for "hvordan kommunen gerne vil beskrive virkeligheden", så vil jeg mene at highway=foot, bicycle=yes er en passende tagging.

Hvis det er for kontroversielt for nogen, skal alternativet være highway=path.
Lige i dette tilfælde vil jeg på ingen måde mene at highway=cycleway, foot=yes vil være passende. Broen tilgodeser (også ved dens belægning nogle steder) i langt højere grad gående end cyklende.
prakashh (2017-03-19 03:27:54+00:00): It's a change in Bardiya not Kailali.
majkaz (2017-03-21 11:00:34+00:00): Ahoj, díky za příspěvky. Všimla jsem si ale, že mapuješ pomocí maps.me, a je třeba si tady dát pozor na pár věcí - jednak ta aplikace pracuje se starými daty, takže se ti při nejlepší snaze může stát, že přidáš duplikát. 
A teď konkrétně: To hopsárium už zmapované bylo, ale přidání jen jako "atrakce" taky není správně. Je třeba připsat co přesně za atrakci to je. Pokud to za atrakci považuješ, správné by bylo opravit ten původní bod přidáním označení atrakce, a nepřidávat nový.
kartler175 (2017-03-25 11:53:38+00:00): Is there a separate cycleway or a cycle lane on 128 Avenue? If not both is true, please remove one of these tags. One feature - one osm element: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element#General_rules
BC Hiker (2017-03-25 17:49:29+00:00): Yes there is a separate paved cycle path on the north side of 128 ave. I have physically surveyed this and can provide a GPS track if required. 128 ave also has an on-road bike lane in addition to the separate path.
ff5722 (2017-03-19 08:10:28+00:00): 道路真的只叫‘南’？
freebeer (2018-12-21 12:02:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65666690 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me alpine hut in a city
Felix10120 (2018-12-21 12:47:30+00:00): It's not an alpine hut (obviously?). It's a condominium. This entry was supposed to contribute to a better coverage of openstreetmap.
freebeer (2018-12-21 13:51:38+00:00): in that case, it should be correctly tagged, as to label it an alpine hut is misleading and does not contribute to the accuracy of osm, so whether that adds to better coverage is debatable.

there is also nothing at this point, it is too close to the road to be useful.

what would contribute the most would be to draw the outlines of the condominium, and tag it correctly, as obvious wrong tagging is more likely to cause it to be deleted as probably fictional.

thanks.
Felix10120 (2018-12-22 20:35:07+00:00): Alright, delete it then, I was doing it from mobile where these things are limited (e.g. categories) or not possible (drawing line). Just trying to help. Whatever. Go ahead, delete it.
Glassman (2017-03-19 14:38:57+00:00): Thanks for adding addresses.
VA00 (2018-11-30 20:32:14+00:00): Dlaczego PL:zone jest uznane za błędne/nieprecyzyjne?