piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-05-09 21:11:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Fringillus (2019-04-16 18:26:15+00:00): Hej! Varför togs natural=coastline bort på samtliga öar?
user_5359 (2019-04-15 18:41:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you know the entry https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66418809#map=18/38.88981/-77.00907 ?? Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. I delete your entry!
kapazao (2019-04-16 08:43:12+00:00): Hello, I have seen you have created a lot of buildings around Albolote.
You used Bing imagery and you did not move imagery to a correct position, so now the buildings are placed in a wrong position because we use PNOA imagery as default as you can check looking at the rest of ways, etc.
It would be good if you could fix it.
Thank you for your contributions, regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69244059
magma18 (2019-04-16 14:27:11+00:00): Thanks for drawing my attention, I will do my best to revert those errors.
Leo Slager (2019-04-16 23:15:18+00:00): De juiste manier is:
highway=construction
en daaraan toevoegen:
construction=tertiary
IIVQ (2019-10-28 22:17:25+00:00): Hoi,

Tijdelijke werkzaamheden mogen best op Openstreetmap, maar zorg dan wel dat je ze goed bijhoudt. Deze brug is al maanden weer open, maar stond nog op access=no. Ik heb het aangepast.
dgitto (2019-04-16 00:50:13+00:00): Hello. The key "entierro" has no meaning in openstreetmap.
BladeTC (2019-04-16 14:56:10+00:00): Olá, consegue mapear os nomes das ruas desse bairro? Mas sem copiar de outros mapas.
Lessaum (2019-04-16 15:47:51+00:00): Sim ... assim que possível e terminar de mapear os bairros são rogerio começarei o mario emilio banwart
sannkc (2019-04-15 18:15:42+00:00): Correction: Johnson County, not Douglas County
olehz (2019-04-15 20:34:29+00:00): Ну це вже жесть. Таких "порогів" тисячі по карпатських річках. Навіть в десятки раз більш крутіших. Ну це ж явний хлам. Давай ще ревертнемо зміни, як народ відмічає "гарна галявина", "прикольна дерево". Я от, наприклад, не вважаю, що якесь конкретне дерево прикольне - бачив куди прікольніші. Суб'єктивно ж. Будемо мапу лайками засерати?
Myazyk (2019-04-17 19:47:48+00:00): Я розумію, що ти маєш на увазі - тре якийсь критерій виробити, бо справді надлишок таких об'єктів може засмічувати карту і не обов'язково всі відзначені місця можуть справді бути туристично цінними.
Але я наполягатиму, що тре позначати деякі такі об'єкти. Наприклад у Локоті меандри стрия - там офігенний краєвид + найдовший у Львівській області підвісний міст. Також тре позначати місця, де приїжджають на річку відпочивати люди. Можна позначати якісь древні дерева, які охороняються тощо
olehz (2019-04-17 20:44:12+00:00): а тут не треба нічого вигадувати:
1. водоспад - це водоспад, а не каменюки у річці
2. дерево - це дерево. якщо дерево має туристичну чи історичну цінність, на нього вішається відповідний тег
3. viewpoint - це зазвичай облаштований майдначик (виключенням, можуть бути твої Меандри, але лише за умови, що це єдине місце звідки відкривається панорама - зазвичай це найвища точка)

тому усі ці "флішові виступи" і "красиві місцевості" тре повидаляти. по Карпатах повно, що першого, що другого. починаючи з того самого Рибника

https://opentripmap.com/en/#11.5/49.3454/23.5844 - сервіс, який допомагає знайти цікаві точки (сам користуюсь, якщо кудись їду), а у нас якийсь хлам. я думаю, турист буде сильно розчарований, якщо повірить мапі і піде дивитись на ті Флфшеві виступи
JeroenHoek (2019-04-15 19:28:14+00:00): De renderer is wat traag, maar nu klopt hij denk ik. Ik heb nog even een verdwaalde way opgeruimd.
Jan Wilts (2019-04-15 21:19:31+00:00): Top, dankjewel!
MarcoR (2019-04-15 19:30:20+00:00): Please avoid doing this. I have reverted this changeset
eggie (2019-04-15 20:37:06+00:00): Hallo.. Hier hast du den tag building=yes weggeholt. Das Gebäude is sofort nicht mehr sichtbar. 
Das Wald is ein Multipolygon ohne Inners.
Ich werde das etwas änderen sonst das Wasser (inner)  ist verschwunden. 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-04-15 20:20:51+00:00): De eerste edit net over de grens, maar dan toch... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap Nederland. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-04-15 20:24:35+00:00): Let op ...Bing achtergrond ligt behoorlijk verschoven. 
Voor Nederland gebruiken we de PDOK 25cm  luchtfoto. De Bondsrepubliek heeft ook betere achtergrondskaarten. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-15 20:28:00+00:00): Wat is overigens je bedoeling, want het is niet duidelijk wat je hebt gedaan?
gr Eggie
4004 (2019-04-20 23:55:50+00:00): thanks!
you guys have your fancy digitalglobe imagery as well, but the one we have from esri is really misaligned, so 7-year old bing seems like a safe choice most of the time
JovianMapper (2019-04-22 16:22:11+00:00): Sounds good, thank you.
David Wyn (2026-07-09 14:33:01+00:00): da iawn Ben! Wyn
DressyPear4 (2019-04-15 23:04:04+00:00): Olá, use o bom censo e adicione uma descrição nas edições que está fazendo, isso ajuda outros mapeadores.
Uma dica é evitar grudar áreas com vias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69248323
marczoutendijk (2023-07-27 18:30:54+00:00): What is the meaning of leisure=*
ibanez (2019-04-15 22:06:14+00:00): Hallo OkerJoker,
warum bekommen die Spielplätze von dir "Namen" die da nicht dranstehen. Ich habe schon einige Spielplatzschilder fotografiert, ein Straßenname war da nicht dabei.
Viele Grüße
-ibanez-
OkerJoker (2019-04-16 19:03:04+00:00): Hallo Jens.
Die Spielplätze werden in der Regel nach der Straße benannt, vor der aus der Zugang erfolgt, In Randortslagen auch nach dem Baugebiet. Mag sein, daß die Stadt Gifhorn nicht genug Platz auf den Schildern für diese Information hat.
E de Wit (2019-04-15 20:15:55+00:00): Deze bus keert en gaat (zonder tussenpauze) terug naar het Busstation.
De terugrit samenvoegen met de relatie van de heenrit?
Jan Wilts (2019-04-15 21:19:06+00:00): Twijfelgeval, OV in Nederland geeft deze lijn wél aan als één lijn heen en weer (zie http://wiki.ovinnederland.nl/wiki/Lijn_612_Leeuwarden,_Busstation_-_NHL_Hogeschool). In tegenstelling tot bijvoorbeeld lijn 16, wat wel gedefinieerd als een lus is (zie http://wiki.ovinnederland.nl/wiki/Lijn_16_Leeuwarden,_Busstation_-_Bilgaard).
Jan Wilts (2019-04-15 21:21:14+00:00): Maar deze lijn rijdt inderdaad wel echt als een lus (neem hem dagelijks).
DressyPear4 (2019-04-15 23:01:53+00:00): Olá, não devemos usar informações do google maps, para nomear ruas, no navegador lado direito, tem a opção de mudar a camada de fundo,  selecione IBGE Setores Urbanos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69248855
Glassman (2019-04-15 23:30:18+00:00): I removed the hospital tag - it really isn't a hospital. You might also want to add an address, phone and website. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69249055
andrewwiseman (2019-04-15 20:49:19+00:00): These buildings should be squared.
DressyPear4 (2019-04-15 22:57:46+00:00): Olá, atente - se em colocar a 1ª letra de cada palavra em maiúsculo.
Nessa praça fiz a correção.
trigpoint (2019-04-19 11:48:11+00:00): Reverted, this is an arable field
eggie (2019-04-16 07:21:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-16 12:38:44+00:00): I'm sorry but you're just getting silly now.  All your comments just read "Added from local knowledge and OS OOC".  In most cases there appears to be (a) no evidence of local knowledge (and people with local knowledge say you are wrong) and (b) nothing visible on OOC maps available within OSM.
In this particular case, "Steep Hill" is the name of a street to the south.  I've been there, and I've never seen anything suggesting that there is a peak called "Steep Hill"somwhere to the northeast of there.
In each changeset in which you have said "Added from local knowledge and OS OOC" please add a changeset comment saying both (a) what local knowledge you have and (b) what OOC map that is suitable for use within OSM that people can refer to to check what you have added.  If you do not do this we'll be forced to revert all of these unsourced and unreliable changesets.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
BladeTC (2019-04-16 15:01:03+00:00): Lessaum, se essa area é "landuse=meadow", não pode ser tbm "natural=wood".
As duas criam conflito.
Lessaum (2019-04-16 15:46:16+00:00): ok entendido ... obrigado mesmo se possível continue me dando dicas
ralley (2019-04-16 18:59:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit.  One thing I've noticed - you've put the address as the name.  The name field should be used as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Additional_data .  In this case isn't the name of the restaurant "Raewyn's Restaurant"?
Sid Bachtiar (2019-04-16 21:17:40+00:00): Thank you, I have corrected the name now. Sorry about the mistake, I'm still learning.
gormo (2019-09-26 12:23:13+00:00): Could you try to fix the self-intersections of the Verteilerebene, if you have detailed knowledge of the situation on the ground? I am not knowledgeable of the situation there.
BladeTC (2019-04-16 14:04:50+00:00): Pare de inventar o que não existe por causa desse jogo idiota.
borovac (2021-06-15 11:30:36+00:00): Hi,

Probably you  accidentally pressed e instead of 3 or 4 on this way:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655142327

Can you go back and check because you have a local knowledge.

Thank you, Milan
BladeTC (2019-04-16 15:04:17+00:00): Muito bom seus mapeamentos, quero deixar aa dica que em areas não se mapeia "building". Building é só para a casa/predio em si. Abraços!
Lessaum (2019-04-16 15:36:49+00:00): obrigado comei recente e não esta achando a opção creche ou berçário agora corrigi... abraço
Lessaum (2019-04-16 15:38:16+00:00): vou fazer a alteração que me situou ...obrigado
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-22 16:53:34+00:00): Jakie jest żródło tych planowanych budynków jak np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684027464 ?
MorPal (2019-10-24 13:44:39+00:00): https://wiarygodnydeweloper.pl/images/webpage/osiedle-podgaje-1034-281-0.jpg?t=1571924361
Andrea Musuruane (2019-04-16 07:31:57+00:00): I really dislike this way of doing things. You have automatically edited bus stops which were previously imported using GTT open data. The import have been agreed on talk-it ML and documented on OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Torino/Trasporti_pubblici#Documenti_a_disposizione The reason for the unknown values was to manually check bus stops where GTT had no data available. The revision is still in progress (also using Mapillary to check them). Moreover you state that your account is focused on "no-survey changeset as advised on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct". As said, this is clearly not the case. Moreover you also didn't contact the local community and performed an automated edit. Please revert your changes.
IlBano (2019-04-16 09:13:55+00:00): This is clearly an automated edit and you completely missed the code of conduct that you cite on your user page as your guidance. This changeset affects a very large part of territory in which the Italian community is very active and you did not even bother to understand why you found so many tag values that you feel umconfortable with. I strongly agree with Andrea Musuruane and I expect this to be reverted as soon as possible
marc__marc (2019-04-16 09:17:38+00:00): Hello Andrea,
I  have reverted my changeset (including of course all other fix included with it).
you're quite right that I should have discussed it on the import page but the link to it was missing on the initial changeset and even the wiki page you link me to has no link to the import documentation as recommended nor a link to the import mailing (so maybe the first issue is the import doesn't follow the import rule). I don't understand the need for an unknown value, the absence of a key also indicates that the information is not available. and this prevents each use of the data to have to make a value list meaning that there is no value like unknown not-available Idon'tremember maybe Ineedtocheckit...).
Besides, I don't understand what you mean by "you state that your account is focused on "no-survey changeset<...> this is clearly not the case.". I didn't make a survey for this changeet, otherwise I could have completed all the unknown information.
Regards,
Marc
marc__marc (2019-04-16 09:33:03+00:00): Hello IlBano
you're right, the cleaning of an import should apparently have followed the whole procedure as well. I thought the code of conduct  explicitly said that a revert was exempted, it's not the case. sorry for this error. as you'll read above, it's already been reverted. 
Regards,
Marc
Andrea Musuruane (2019-04-16 09:47:13+00:00): Hello Marc, thank you for quick response. I do believe this import predates current import guidelines. IIRC it was performed around 2012. What I tried to explain is "Automated Edits code of conduct" forbids undiscussed imports and this is clearly not the case. Best regards, Andrea
IlBano (2019-04-16 10:05:20+00:00): Hi Marc,
I really appreciated the promptness of your response which is not always something granted by all mappers. I'm not involved directly in the mapping of public transport platform in this area, but I believe that the presence of tags with value=unknown was considered locally as a way to flag for mappers the need to enrich the stop nodes definition after the import.
Thanks
Regards
cquest (2019-04-16 10:15:40+00:00): building=ruins is to be used on abandoned buildings, which is clearly not the case.

The roof burnt, there's a hole in a small portion of the ceiling... and thank to the firefighters everything else is still there.

I've reverted back to building=cathedral
Stereo (2019-04-16 00:59:09+00:00): Hi Pedja. Good idea. There's a few more without the name in cyrillic in Gračanica: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/I0u

Have you ever visited?
Pedja (2019-04-16 01:37:10+00:00): It will all be done but it takes time.
mueschel (2019-04-24 09:43:55+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "Out" here. This is not used in other places. Did you mean outdoor_seating or  takeaway?
Hervé TUC (2019-04-25 04:24:04+00:00): Hi, 
Yes this was a mistake, I meant outdoor_seating, i updated it.
Thanks!
Glassman (2019-04-16 16:23:54+00:00): I made some modifications to your great addition of the new road in Issaquah using https://www.issaquahwa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3806 as a source. do you know if the two roundabouts are complete?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69252850
world_searcher (2019-04-16 18:56:04+00:00): Yes, the two roundabouts are completed. There is also a underpass for the East Lake Sammamish Trail which was completed earlier this year, though I'm not sure how to put that into the map.
Glassman (2019-04-16 21:54:02+00:00): I added a tunnel to the section of the trail that goes under SE 62nd Street. I've also added the roundabout on the east end of SE 62nd St. and modified some of the sidewalks. Feel free to jump in and correct anything that I might have screwed up.
Felipe Alves (2019-04-16 20:54:25+00:00): Oi, Caio. Tudo bem?
Vi que fez várias edições na praça, vou dar só umas dicas. Pode fazer várias edições em apenas um conjunto, não precisa sempre salvar e iniciar outro(s). Uma das coisas que corrigi foi deixar as áreas que são retangulares no formato correto, e retirar o nome de algumas áreas. Quando não é um nome oficial, e sim uma descrição, tem um campo específico para isso.
Abs
S-zation (2019-04-16 21:27:18+00:00): Hi,
Could you please be more careful when you are updating golf courses in the future?  You deleted the boundaries of The Bucks Club in this changeset. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7424560)
S-zation (2019-04-16 22:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69287738
divya_sree (2019-07-17 07:40:08+00:00): "Hi Adiatma IRM-RV,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way 453835237 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'tertiary' from node 4505176212 to node 4505175160.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
skquinn (2019-11-29 22:36:07+00:00): What is your source for this data? Did you survey the area around this time?
Dimacn (2019-04-16 11:28:14+00:00): Для дворовых проездов (внутриквартальных проездов) надо использовать теги highway=service и living_street=yes . Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
и здесь https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%93%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%94%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8B
Дорога со статусом highway=residential используется для улиц (почти всегда для поименованных).
Marych_ (2019-04-16 07:23:58+00:00): Проезды внутри домов это
service
или
living_street
Shaman1919 (2019-04-16 09:15:30+00:00): Living streen как по мне, причем тут служебные дороги?
Marych_ (2019-04-17 04:52:36+00:00): Здесь описание, что для чего
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway

residential это дорога которая соединяет крупные населенные пункты или районы
WoodWoseWulf (2019-04-16 23:56:56+00:00): Hi and welcome back to OSM. 

Looking at this edit, it appears that you have added a park over some residential homes. This isn't the first time you've made a similar edit (changeset 54356558 also added an invalid park).

Please only add real features to the map. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.
GOwin (2019-05-08 22:04:41+00:00): If you need to map more areas like this, kindly check out: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_Fire_Hazard_Zones

This information is helpful for emergency responders, local authorities, and community planners. Thank you.
smaprs (2019-04-16 14:29:33+00:00): Hi, please keep in mind that Africa has a particular stablished classification coherent to its road structure. At https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
HavelockIsland (2019-04-16 23:24:16+00:00): Hi smaprs. I am changing these roads to track so that they follow the definitions on the Highway Tag Africa page. These roads mostly connect farms, not settlements. Do you think they should be something else?
smaprs (2019-04-17 01:45:04+00:00): Thank you for your work. I've mapped a lot eastern Nigeria too. You're right, tracks defined as ways leading from houses to farm/field, 
not for ways connecting other settlements.  
But between settlements, there should be at least one routable way for motor vehicles (at least 4WD). Many times they cross the farmlands. 
From A) Gudumbali  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/501526463  
to B) Karna Gabchari  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5511453207  
I can see there are at least two more named settlements:  
Aisaka A  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5511452779  
Jabbari  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5511455888  
and another one, unnamed, but with many houses, there:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5511453297  
So 5 rural/farm settlements in the way, but still settlements.  
  
Also, extending from there, I would consider it as a somehow continuous way (almos all dry ground can be a road) since it leads to  
Dumba'A  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3646370674  
perhaps through this larger unnamed settlement (would need to examine a bit more to confirm) 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227799648  
and from there to the border with Niger,  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682805966  
and here there are marks of wheels of motor vehicles  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451352357  
indicating that it's a more important way than just for some cow cart.  
So the lager context is also important to examine.  
It seems to me it's a significative way, that could be "unclassified". 
I agree, seems around there there's a bit too much of others as "unclassified", that could be just tracks.  
Thank you, good job.
HavelockIsland (2019-04-18 13:29:04+00:00): Thanks. I’ll continue to change these types of roads to track, but leave at least one route between settlements like the ones you listed as unclassified.
nevw (2019-04-16 09:49:22+00:00): The lack of suitable tags make this edit unsuitable for osm and appears to be only designed for search engine optimisation.
Can you add suitable tags to identify and locate the business in osm.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:42:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:45:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-04-16 07:22:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-04-16 07:26:16+00:00): Dag 1349DX
Highway road gebruik je alleen als je niet weet welk soort weg het is.
Niet dooorlopende wegen zijn vaak highway=residential
construction=residential moet nog verwijderd worden. 
lanes=2 zal is niet gebruikelijk en meer voor doorgaande wegen met meer rijbanen en wegmarkering. Dat kan er denk ik af.
MVG,
Eggie
literan (2019-04-20 11:44:56+00:00): не надо массово расставлять фальшивые точечные парки и скверы
literan (2019-04-20 11:42:44+00:00): опять вандализм - удаление тега здания и дублирование тега детского сада, который уже стоит на территории, как и положено
nevw (2019-04-16 09:52:25+00:00): The lack of suitable tags make this edit unsuitable for osm and appears to be only designed for search engine optimisation.
Can you add suitable tags to identify and locate the business in osm.
nevw (2019-04-18 04:32:28+00:00): Your website states you are located at 1081 Moore Park Rd, Gooburrum, QLD 4670 
This is not at the same location as the business point you added to the OSM.
literan (2019-04-20 11:40:14+00:00): опять теги здания удаляете. Системный вандализм
py_berrard (2019-09-08 12:47:53+00:00): Pour info, le tag pour un lieu dit est place=locality.
Pas besoin de mettre "Lieu-dit" dans le name.
literan (2019-04-20 11:38:09+00:00): нафига удаляете теги зданий?? и расставляете эти бестолковые switch... откатываю
literan (2019-04-20 11:37:17+00:00): Если это подстанции, то тег некорректный https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=switch?uselang=ru Свитч - это сооружение на больших подстанциях. Удалю пока.
archie (2019-04-16 09:49:20+00:00): Hej och välkommen till osm! Du har bl a ändrat taggen highway=path till highway=footway på följande sträckor: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4770139 samt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180803633. Du bör kolla på hjälpsidorna (i det här fallet: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag) innan du gör sådana ändringar. I det här fallet skall det vara highway=path. Jag har reverterat dina ändringar i detta avseende.
eggie (2019-04-16 08:02:12+00:00): Dit waren je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69260361
Er moet wel een highway tag op anders zie je geen weg op de kaart . Dus
highway=residential

construction=residential is nu overbodig, want de weg is kennelijk gereed. 
(het is alleen een specificatie bij wegen in aanleg) 

lanes=0 kan niet. Die regel gewoon weghalen. 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-04-16 08:51:49+00:00): aangepast