piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cleary (2018-05-15 22:33:48+00:00): It is about five years since I was there. A local resident told me that Toolebuc Middleton Road was the old name for Mackunda Downs Road and so I mapped it with both name and alt_name tags. If the route has bee changed since (for example, to avoid creek crossings) then perhaps Mackunda Downs Road needs to be re-mapped and/or re-named. That is why I was interested in the source of your data - if it is official source and recent data, then perhaps I need to change Mackunda Downs Road.  The scenery in afternoon light is full of beautiful outback colours in that area so I might try to get back there for another look. Also if there is an approved source that OSM can use, I would like to access it to obtain some other road names elsewhere in Queensland. I would appreciate if you could please clarify the source of your data.
spjaquish (2018-05-16 15:04:49+00:00): Hi Cleary,

I would be happy to direct you to the source of my data.
I had been using a resource approved by the Queensland Government for use in OSM which may not reflect local knowledge of this road name if it has changed recently.
Further information and permissions can be found in the link below,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/qld.data.gov.au_explicit_permission
I hope this helps!
As always, please let me know if you have any additional questions.

Cheers,

Spencer
cleary (2018-05-17 05:08:07+00:00): Hello again Spencer,
That permission refers to Transport and Main Road datasets within tha larger data.qld.gov.au collection and it requires that each individual dataset is identified in the OSM Contributors page. I am still unable to find the data about Toolebuc Middleton Road. It would help me if you could specify the particular dataset that has this information. 
Regards
spjaquish (2018-05-17 15:45:26+00:00): Hi Cleary, 
The file that I used is titled "Baseline roads and tracks - Queensland" which I've linked below. I hope that helps you in your mapping!
Regards,
Spencer

http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/detail.page?fid={67B61562-A329-4119-929B-1D400EBE4E7F}
cleary (2018-05-18 04:46:52+00:00): Thanks for the information. Unfortunately, as far as I can ascertain, this data belongs to the Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy.  If so, I think OSM does not have permission to use it. Hopefully we will eventually get permission.
cleary (2018-05-18 07:30:27+00:00): I have located some of that data. Much of it is diagrammatic rather than geographically accurate (i.e. it shows that roads exist and it shows approximate locations but is not precise). Also the government department which provided the data is not the organisation which is responsible for it so that names etc. are not necessarily accurate.  Google licenses this data for its maps and that is one of the reasons that google maps are notoriously unreliable in rural Australia while OSM, with more survey-based data, is more accurate and reliable. I suggest that removal of this data from OSM will improve our map.
spjaquish (2018-05-18 15:20:00+00:00): Hi Cleary, 

Thank you for your comments and for bringing this to our attention. 
Proper data usage and handling is of great importance to us and we will be looking into this further to make sure everthing is on the mark. 

Regards,

Spencer
cleary (2018-05-19 10:27:44+00:00): Your response referred to "us" and I have just realised you are with the Microsoft Open Maps Team - thanks for your contributions to OSM.  But I thought I should suggest to you that data, even from government sources, is often badly obsolete in some rural parts of Australia (including New South Wales with which I am most familiar). Best to be cautious with such data - often it has old names, and still shows roads that have closed, been privatised or re-routed. Satellite imagery may not always allow the viewer to appreciate a feature's current status as a road. Thanks again to you and your team.
freebeer (2018-03-01 17:53:00+00:00): Hallo,
Can you explain why you have here deleted dozens of car park areas mapped by other mappers in great detail, and made no changes other than deletions here?
SHARCRASH (2018-05-26 14:59:55+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remarqué que vous connectez des points de batiments à des routes, ce qui engendre des erreurs. Ici par exemple: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5443859345/history
J'en ai corigé quelques un mais je vous laisse libre de réctifier les autres. Veuillez éviter cela à l'avenir, merci pour votre compréhension. :)
SHARCRASH (2018-05-26 15:17:27+00:00): Aussi, vous avez peut-être remarqué qu'il y a un décalage entre différents éléments, c'est parce que dans l’éditeur ID il arrive souvent que les fonds de carte aient été intégrés sans rectification de décalage (offset). Bing par exemple... Il faut vérifier/corriger un fond de carte avant de l'utiliser pour intégrer/aligner des éléments. Il vous faut trouver une source fiable avant tout et aligner le fond d'écran (SPW recent image à l'air fable). Voici un batiment que je viens d'aligner avec assez de précision, par exemple: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565152668/history#map=19/49.77075/5.62088 Aussi méfiez vous des ombres.
Digne (2018-03-01 16:02:42+00:00): Hallo R_S,

Ik had hier even naar gekeken omdat er om feedback was gevraagd. Het ziet er naar maar inziens allemaal goed uit. Ik zou wel aanraden iets meer informatie in de beschrijving van de changeset te zetten, al zijn het maar 5 of 6 woorden. Dat maakt het werk van anderen wat gemakkelijker.
R_S (2018-03-02 01:38:40+00:00): Hallo Digne,
Bedankt voor het nakijken.
Ik had per ongelijk het nakijk vakje aangevinkt.
Ik zal de beschrijvingen in het vervolg proberen te verbeteren.
Lokai (2018-03-01 05:40:41+00:00): Hallo,

Ein Teil des Pfälzerwaldes ist nun ein Tierpark. Das sieht nach einem Mappingunfall aus. Ich habe zur Zeit nur begrenzte Mittel (Programm-Ausstattung, Tablet) um das näher zu betrachten. Kötte auch ein anderer CS sein (56770046).
Schröcker (2018-03-02 00:37:04+00:00): Hallo, ich habe die Grenzen der Relation "Bewirtschafteter Wald Pfälzerwald" minimal verändert, sodaß der "Natur- und Tierpark" außerhalb ist. Ansonsten habe ich mich an dem Kurpfalzpark orientiert. Dieser liegt auch innerhalb der Relation "Pfälzerwald". Unklar ist die weitere Umgestaltung. Wege sind gesperrt, die Tiergehege sind leer.
Lokai (2018-03-02 05:12:08+00:00): Es ging mir um die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1601138. Die gesamte Fläche war als Tierpark ausgewiesen. Ich habe noch einen Teilscreenshot, kann den jedoch jetzt nicht zur Verfügung stellen. Das falsche Darstellung war wohl nur temporär und der Grund mir unbekannt. Ich reiche den Screenshot bei Bedarf noch nach
Schröcker (2018-03-02 18:29:30+00:00): Nicht erforderlich. Ich habe solche "Effekte" auch schon beobachtet u.a. bei verschiedenen Vergrößerungsmaßstäben unterschiedliche Texte! Die Relation "Pfälzerwald" deckt aber nicht den bei Wikipedia angegebene Bereich ab und passt mit den beiden anderen Relationen "Bewirtschafteter Wald Pälzerwald" nicht so richtig zusammen. Evtl. ein Diskussionsthema? - aber damit habe ich keine Erfahrungen wie man so etwas initialisiert.
whb (2018-03-03 12:48:44+00:00): Wie oben vermutet, war es der Änderungssatz 56770046:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56770046
Die äußere Linie des größten Waldstückes der oben genannten Relation wurde zu einem Park:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113435421
Diesen Fehler hatte ich schon behoben.
Schröcker (2018-03-04 23:25:42+00:00): Danke für die Fehlerberichtigung!
Lokai (2018-03-05 08:45:13+00:00): Hier ein Screenshot

https://i.imgur.com/1dvZzA2.jpg

Auch von mir ein Danke und allzeit ein frohes mapping
Hjart (2018-02-28 22:34:20+00:00): Du fik lavet en dublet node her, som jeg har rettet. Bemærk også at hvis du laver _link's skal de helst være efter den højeste vejklasse, som i dette tilfælde er secondary
aseerel4c26 (2018-02-28 21:53:22+00:00): Nachtrag: die Telefonummern (++ -> +) habe ich nicht besichtigt, sondern nur das Format korrigiert
Carlos Brys (2018-03-01 10:57:53+00:00): Completé la descripción de los nodos que estaban sin clasificar. Agregué la calle y la localidad.
Digne (2018-03-01 16:18:04+00:00): Ik zal beginnen met een disclaimer: Ik ben zelf echt geen expert op het gebied van fietsroutes. Maar ik heb geen fout kunnen ontdekken dus ik denk dat het goed is gegaan. 

Ik vraag me wel af of de cycleway=lane op de Kanaaldijk-Noord
 klopt. Ik zie dat er roze stroken zijn, maar geen getekende fietsen. In dat geval is cycleway=shared_lane passend. Zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
Luxus8 (2018-03-02 09:08:08+00:00): Ahja, subtiel verschil inderdaad met die fiets(suggestie)stroken. Ik heb het aangepast!
dudka (2018-03-03 20:25:36+00:00): чому видалив Біляївську міськраду?
olehz (2018-03-04 13:00:19+00:00): https://otg.land.gov.ua/ - неправильну геометрію і рівень вкладеності мала. а чому видалив, а не поправив не знаю. відновлю. спасибі за зауваження
dudka (2018-03-04 13:06:50+00:00): вони мабуть не занесли собі інформацію про те що Біляївка вже 2 роки як місто обласного значення http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/944-viii
DaveF (2019-08-02 19:50:52+00:00): Hi
highway=foot on a platform is not required (a platform's primary purpose is to be walked upon)
You've mapped a level crossing. Has the bridge been removed?
A level crossing or bridge isn't a platform.
John-O (2019-08-04 12:04:40+00:00): I think I see what's happened. Rather than drawing a section of footway between the two platforms, I've extended the platform instead.

Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72988199

Regarding the bridge, I don't know. I didn't remove on in this changeset. From what I remember, the platform slopes down, and there is a crossing across the tracks to get to the other platform
DaveF (2019-08-04 14:14:29+00:00): Thanks for amending.

Sorry, I meant has the bridge been removed recently in the real world. It was there a year ago.

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/5772238
John-O (2019-08-08 22:19:49+00:00): sorry, I don't remember. I think I mapped out of the train window ~1 year ago. I'll check if I go through on the train again, but I've no idea when that might be
DaveF (2019-08-08 22:29:00+00:00): I'm changing it to a bridge as I don't think you mapped it correctly..
John-O (2019-08-08 22:42:00+00:00): Looking at the photos on Wikipedia I think you are correct. The platforms don't line up in a way it would make sense to go between them like the path I mapped
skifans (2020-03-02 16:59:44+00:00): Bit late but just confirming, yes the platforms are staggered (as currently mapped), and yes the bridge is still present.
DaveF (2020-03-02 17:23:08+00:00): Great, thanks.
SomeoneElse (2018-03-12 22:10:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba
eggie (2018-03-01 06:43:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
kaltuna (2018-04-04 04:41:11+00:00): Hallo, schau doch bitte mal diesen Hinweismarker
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1341926
Dort stellt ein anderer User eine Frage, warum Du die Fahrspur von der Brücke herunter kommend von primary auf secondary geändert hast, was ich mich auch frage.

Viele Grüße !
Mah (2018-04-10 19:15:53+00:00): Antwort siehe Marker. 
Grüße Mah
eggie (2018-03-01 06:52:22+00:00): Volgens het kadaster bestaat het gebouw nog steeds.  Wellicht even een terugmelding doen via deze site van de BAG. Wanneer het gebouw gesloopt is kan de adresnode en de "way" ook weg. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=louis%20bouwmeesterstraat%2072&resultOffset=0&objectId=0363100012123380&geometry.x=116549&geometry.y=485148&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0363010000728809
Doe je het zelf?
eggie (2018-03-01 06:56:55+00:00): Gebouw nr 86 Sierplein heb ik in een zgn. Multipolygoon gezet. Het gebouw als inner en het plein als outer. Dan zie je het gebouw straks wel. building=yes heb ik verwijderd van de node. 
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Glassman (2018-03-01 03:51:33+00:00): Why did you make this street private? It looks just a like a typical city street? Access private would be appropriate for a driveway or possibly a development. For more information check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
corfede (2018-03-09 12:57:13+00:00): Ma veramente questa strada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187774888 attraversa la ferrovia? Ci passa sotto? Dalle foto sembra che invece si blocchi prima dei binari.
Makkio (2018-03-09 16:33:08+00:00): No. Li attraversa e continua dall altro lato, ovviamente si passa solo a piedi o in bicicletta perche c e il binario. La linea ferroviaria è attiva ma da inizio 2017 non ci sono piu corse, a parte qualche treno di manutenzione forse.
5m4u9 (2018-03-01 14:04:58+00:00): hola, gracias por añadir estas oficinas. corregí la subalcaldia como oficina de gobierno local
JJIglesias (2018-03-01 00:21:13+00:00): Saludos Mayra
Los "Living Street" son calles muy particulares con restricciones especiales al transito, las cuales NO se aplican a la Avenida Kennedy ni a la Avenida Montes.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
//
Para los efectos de esa zona las calles son Residencial:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dresidential
Gracias y saludos
JJ
GOwin (2018-03-31 00:39:15+00:00): Hi again. If you want to add the names of streets, the easiest would be the iD editor, if you have a computer

On mobile devices, you can try the Vespucci editor, which isn't as easy as iD, but works well enough. See http://vespucci.io/

Please avoid using other object types (like guest houses, or bakeries) to mark street names. You'd be better off using notes or comments for that.

I do appreciate how you're making your best effort to supply missing information on the map. Thank you.

/GOwin
viloan (2018-03-01 00:12:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-03-01 00:29:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-03-01 06:55:05+00:00): Weclome to OSM! For better description of your object please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=skateboard
user_5359 (2018-03-01 06:50:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please? I have divide your value of addr:housenumer to addr:street, please check this value.
Vulcanodong (2018-03-02 04:59:25+00:00): 你好 欢迎你来到OSM
通过观察你的编辑结果 好像你对编辑工具还不熟悉
如有不懂的地方可以向我询问
你的一些不准确的编辑我已经帮你删除了
felipeeugenio (2019-12-09 14:53:30+00:00): shop=optician
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=optician

regards
Warin61 (2018-03-05 22:30:15+00:00): Hi,
Looking at ways 565191189 and 565191193 ... these were not connected.

But I question the road classification! Most people here walk. I would think that these would be better classified as tracks .. looking at Digital Golbe Preium they are certainly smaller than the main connecting roads. They may even be 'paths' where no car (or 4WD) can go due to the width. 

Next .. the surface=unpaved is a usefull addition tag. 
Please consider this in your edits.
richter_fn (2020-05-11 08:54:36+00:00): https://osm.org/changeset/85011811
mavl (2018-08-03 16:31:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61334765 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2134].
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
user_5359 (2018-03-01 06:44:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
user_5359 (2018-03-01 06:36:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read also the definition of oneway=reversible (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#Time_conditional_restrictions). Time conditional restrictions? Please add them.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Supaplex (2018-03-04 15:38:18+00:00): 你好，這些車站還未營運，請勿加上車站標籤，免得混淆使用地圖資料的人。
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:17:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
wille (2018-05-09 12:37:46+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Reverti parcialmente sua edição.

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56774961
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Bernhard Hiller (2018-03-04 10:51:22+00:00): What are you doing? Why do you think that highway 20 is a track or a tertiary? Why did you change an "unclassified" to "service"?
Look at the map: it does not look sensible at all.
Supaplex (2018-03-07 16:47:47+00:00): 南橫路這裡還是依據公路總局的報告，仍在施工不通的狀況，所以用highway=construction比較妥當，而不是像中橫仍有部分有條件的通行狀況
Supaplex (2018-03-07 17:07:01+00:00): 台灣的道路標注方式可以到這邊觀看，已經討論出來並且行之有年
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan/Taiwan_tagging
如有任何問題可以到mailing list Talk-TW，或是臉書社團討論
https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
hoserab (2018-03-01 21:32:40+00:00): Hi CSharp, I noticed you added a playground zone to the map along Hamptons Drive NW by adding another way on top of the existing one. You don't need to do this. I fixed this by splitting the existing road way into separate sections. You can split ways into multiple parts by right-clicking a node and selecting 'split' (or typing 'x').

Cheers!
CSharp (2018-03-02 03:53:56+00:00): Thanks! I wanted to cut that section of the road and add a section in between but I was hesitant and didn't want to screw up the original sections. I'm starting to get a hang of the tools.
Regards :)
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:18:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
RicoElectrico (2018-03-01 06:47:37+00:00): Cześć, mam prośbę

1) "Modyfikacja oznaczenia" to zły opis, bo pasuje praktycznie do wszystkiego! Powinno być na przykład: dodano teren mieszkalny.

2) Nie sklejamy obszarów z drogami. To później bardzo utrudnia ich edycję.

Jeśli masz pytania, śmiało napisz do mnie.
RicoElectrico (2018-03-01 06:48:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2019-07-20 16:19:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.