piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mammi71 (2022-03-20 21:53:03+00:00): Hello polishnamer,
it took me some time because I had to do some research and unfortunately I don't have that much free time.

Your changes have two main problems:
1. the source, Kozierowski's atlas, is a scientific work. And even that is not without controversy. Most West Slavic/Polabic names were etymologically reconstructed from Latin or German sources and then a probable present-day Polish name was derived from that. They are not common Polish geographical names. Several fellow Polish mappers have confirmed this on the OSM forum. *)

2. you made many mistakes, at least in the area I know well, too many mistakes! I think the mistakes are based on unchecked data import (copying from Kozierowski's atlas), insufficient language understanding and lack of local knowledge. I have listed some examples in the OSM forum. *)

Almost all mappers who have commented in the German or Polish forum *) are of the opinion that these names from Kozierowski's atlas do not belong in OSM. alt_name is not an alternative, because it would have to be an alternative to another Polish name, which does not exist? old_name does not apply either, because these places did not have an earlier Polish name at any time. If old_name does exist, it would be the West Slavic name, which we do not know, but only assume or have reconstructed scientifically.
Please delete your entries again, as they do not belong in OSM. If you are interested in the reconstructed Polish names or the work of Kozierowski, then build your own map with umap or other tools.
Thanks
Mammi71

*) https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=857389#p857389



Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
syntex (2022-03-29 16:32:01+00:00): Nie zmieniaj ścieżek pieszo-rowerowych na chodniki!
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:34:19+00:00): This is wrong. It will not be an T intersection, only a left-in left-out.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:36:11+00:00): Don't know where you get this is not L8. L9 is opposite to it. L7 is on the other side.
Frans S (2022-02-22 13:25:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .
A remark. Please tag buildings just as building=yes. (default for HOT mapping)
Best regards
Frans S (2022-02-22 13:34:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
And as mentioned in another comment, tag buildings as building=yes.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117498656
Владимир К (2022-02-17 12:11:05+00:00): Добрый день!
Не надо указывать тип подстанции в name
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232842764/history
до вашей правки название было верное
тип подстанции указывается в теге substation
tux67 (2022-02-17 08:51:13+00:00): Hallo TC66
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Die Adresse war hier schon - wie im Kreis Viersen üblich - als Node gemappt und wurde wieder vom Gebäude entfernt.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst, gib aber beim Upload auch immer die Quelle deines Wissens an um die Nachvollziehbarkeit für andere Mapper zu gewährleisten.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117499048
tux67 (2022-02-17 08:52:47+00:00): btw. hattest du vorher unter einem anderen OSM Account (Te Ce) gemappt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117499048
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-15 11:24:52+00:00): What happened here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117499153
Falsernet (2022-02-17 01:58:41+00:00): + added culverts and adjusted stream
知の巨人 (2022-02-17 17:24:12+00:00): Why have you removed the abandoned railway lines? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117499304
DUGA (2022-02-17 17:29:20+00:00): Where do you live sir? I’m a local and I never saw anything there. They were wrongly added.

You are not welcome to add something currently not there at OSM, if you wish to add railways in the past, go to https://openhistoricalmap.org/. Fail to do so will result in a block to your account.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:42:34+00:00): `=motorway_junction` is only used on exits.
dadavid (2022-03-11 12:21:13+00:00): Hallo, 

in OSM hat jedes Objekt nur eine Adresse. Vielleicht ist die Polizeistation ja ein Gebäude oder Gebäudeteil? Dann kannst du mehrere Eingänge mit jeweils einer Adresse angeben. 

Viele Grüße
David
WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (2022-03-11 12:27:13+00:00): Adresse angepasst...... liebe Grüsse marcel
AndresDuhour (2022-02-20 19:27:20+00:00): Buenas tardes! estoy revisando abreviaturas en San Juan y quería saber en la calle F. Navas Pérez a qué corresponde la F. Si llegás a saber puedo corregirlo, o dónde puedo buscar.
Gracias!
Andrés
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:46:21+00:00): 1. Please don't merge bridge and non-bridge sections.
2. Please notice the use of `change:lanes=`, and alignment is influenced by `placement=`.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:51:05+00:00): Please split your changesets, and use more descriptive comments.
AWX4 (2022-03-03 03:15:20+00:00): I got it. Pls accept that I am a noob on map edit.
kucai (2024-03-21 03:42:24+00:00): don't think there is a bus shelter here. only a pole with a sign.
tastrax (2022-02-21 02:52:26+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
wille (2022-03-03 10:12:48+00:00): Olá Mapeadorosm, reverti todas suas edições (gastei menos de 3 minutos pra fazer isso :), pois você alterou indevidamente o valor da tag place de várias cidades. Antes de fazer edições em massa, consulte a comunidade e procure aprender sobre as regras.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117500161
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-22 16:37:13+00:00): Footpaths should connect to the roads
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-22 06:28:25+00:00): You accidentally deleted a road.
Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117710920
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117500220
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-22 06:38:01+00:00): Parking spaces should be tagged on the main way that passes thru
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117500220
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-17 04:12:24+00:00): removing generic names (example: name=cartpath) to make it easier to find mistagged roads.
Allison P (2022-02-17 07:30:22+00:00): Is it this? https://www.premierstorageofidaho.com/
h551w (2022-02-22 04:35:29+00:00): Yep, that looks right! Their site even uses Mapbox for their embedded map, nice
Allison P (2022-02-22 05:15:11+00:00): I added the business info. Unfortunately, even with the new imagery the buildings are too new to be seen properly.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-17 04:12:11+00:00): removing generic names (example: name=cartpath) to make it easier to find mistagged roads.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
hatul (2024-12-31 13:26:10+00:00): יש פה גדר?
user_5359 (2022-02-17 08:44:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/1328237742/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 13:30:44+00:00): Изтритите полигони са върнати в промяна 118779063. Точката за селото е на същото място.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Langlaeufer (2024-04-17 08:35:40+00:00): Hallo Stefan, 
die Vorfahrtsschilder an Ampeln würde ich nicht einzeln erfassen, sondern nur als traffic_sign an der Ampel selber. Die beiden gehören schließlich zusammen, weil die Vorfahrtsreglung greift ja nur wenn die Ampel aus ist.

Anderenfalls wird beim Routing hier ggf. zweifach eine Wartezeit eingeplant, an der Ampel und an dem Stop/Vorfahrtsschild. 

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wie-kann-man-die-vorfahrt-an-ausgeschalteten-ampeln-erfassen/107077

Grüße
Langläufer
StefanHRT (2024-04-17 10:07:42+00:00): Mahlzeit,

Ich würde die doppelte Wartezeit nicht als schlimm erachten, da ja meist auch Fußgänger als erstes Vorrang haben, danach dann erst die Vorfahrtsstraße, aber gut wenn es die Community anders sieht ist es halt so ;) 

VG
Stefan
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
radiotrefoil (2022-02-17 06:13:43+00:00): Microsoft please revert
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117502813
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:47:09+00:00): Please use `highway=construction`.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:47:32+00:00): `construction=turning_circle` is used.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-17 12:32:51+00:00): Thanks! I now feel a bit silly that I have not checked imagery and just opened note
jake_penguins (2022-03-28 04:06:50+00:00): This section of Kasold Drive is no longer a split road. It's not reflected in Bing aerial maps, but I've checked it in person (I'm a Lawrence resident), and it's reflected in Google street view as well.
abvincen (2022-03-28 08:39:18+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and fixing the edit.
I really appreciate the ground-level information provided on the edit made. Thanks once again for making the necessary corrections, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
abvincen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117503544
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:49:46+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`. They are not proper names. Use `description:en=` + `description:zh=`.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:50:20+00:00): `landuse=construction` should be used, definitely no `building=`.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:51:16+00:00): Please split your changesets, and use more descriptive comments.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-17 06:24:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3054732 otworzyłem
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 07:52:36+00:00): 1. Use `landuse=construction`.
2. `residential=apartments` means an apartment estate.
mueschel (2022-03-09 10:34:58+00:00): Bitte schau mal nach diesem Gebäude, es hat ein "height:"-Tag bekommen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031380235
saeid1373 (2022-02-17 06:33:35+00:00): great
Hidoo00 (2023-06-03 13:06:40+00:00): Hi,

Do you have any reason for leaving these funky "TYPE=#XXX Beskrivning"-tags on the imported buildings or is it okay if I clean them up?

Best regards,
Hidoo
NKA (2023-06-05 06:00:24+00:00): Fixed
user_5359 (2022-02-21 15:56:12+00:00): Hello! Please notice: Wikiepdia has an internal way to link the different languages, it isn't necesssary to add different languages. You can change the language, if the description is better (mostly to the local language), but don't add additional language codes.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-02-17 07:02:16+00:00): تم الرسم حسم معلومات تدوينة فريق الصحراء عن البلدة:
https://alsahra.org/2009/02/%D8%A3%D8%B6%D8%A7%D8%AE-%D8%A7%D9%88%D8%B6%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%A8%D9%84%D8%AF%D8%A9%D9%8C-%D9%86%D8%B3%D9%8A%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%AE/
ququruzka (2022-02-20 21:11:23+00:00): Вітаємо. 

На території України діють правила щодо назви вулиць, провулків, проспектів виключно українською мовою. 

просимо зупинити перейменування вулиць, провулків, проспектів для уникнення ревертів та призупинення аккаунту в подальшому. 

OSM UA team.
angys (2022-03-02 18:34:15+00:00): Hello, do you interest to join a local community OSM telegram group?
Enock4seth (2022-02-17 07:52:05+00:00): Maxar 20220116 - https://tiles.openaerialmap.org/61f1895dbc4fd60005518131/0/61f1895dbc4fd60005518132/{z}/{x}/{y}
Enock4seth (2022-02-17 07:52:26+00:00): Maxar 20220122 - https://tiles.openaerialmap.org/61f1895dbc4fd60005518131/0/61f1895dbc4fd60005518132/{z}/{x}/{y}
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 08:45:16+00:00): Please notice the turn restrictions and `change:lanes=`. Only split when there is. physical separation
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 08:46:31+00:00): Please use changeset comments.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 08:46:14+00:00): Please don't add `building=` to a `landuse=` when the sub-structure doesn't fully cover the site. This is a `=construction`.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 08:46:47+00:00): Please make useful changeset comments.
SHARCRASH (2022-05-19 19:16:55+00:00): The lights/crossings you separated are not right. The car traffic lights are not at the stop, they are at level of the crossing. In extra it complicates the data and eye visualisation (same info in different spots is worse than same info at the same spot).
Stereo (2022-05-27 23:33:51+00:00): Usage as documented on wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals

The data is consumed in that form by zug.lu
Kovoschiz (2022-02-17 08:49:59+00:00): Please create the left-turn slip first before adding this.
marczoutendijk (2022-02-17 08:50:10+00:00): Phone number not in correct format, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
Incorrect use of UPPER case!
StephaneP (2023-10-12 16:41:53+00:00): Hello tykan,

Pour ce genre de prise, le tag amenity=device_charging_station est plus adapté.

A+
Supaplex (2022-02-17 16:53:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4589038759/history 這應該沒通車吧，所以應該用 railway=constrctuion
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117507958
lankapuhelin (2025-03-10 19:31:17+00:00): Tervehdys! Minun nähdäkseni tässä ei ole perustetta kieltää jalankulkua/pyöräilyä (Jokirannan tilan läpi), sillä reitti ei kulje asuinrakennuksen pihapiirin läpi. Mistä läpireitityksestä on btw kyse? Eikö kuitenkin reitityssovellukset lähtökohtaisesti vältä track-teitä, varsinkin autolla reitittäessä? Tuolta ei myöskään pääse mihinkään eli on vaikea nähdä, että tuonne tilalle turhan paljon reitityksiä muodostuisi, kun se on pussinperä.
lankapuhelin (2025-03-10 19:39:56+00:00): Katsoin aluetta tarkemmin ja ymmärrän mitä tarkoitat reitityksellä, onpa erikoinen paikka kun kuntien tieverkosto ei yhdisty.
SimonPoole (2022-02-18 11:17:04+00:00): Hallo ritualis

Was wolltest du mit deiner Änderung denn bewirken? Du hast hier nur einen Punkt mit einem Namen hinzugefügt aber kein eigentliches Objekt (der HB St. Gallen liegt ja auch nicht da).

Gruss
SimonPoole (2022-02-23 10:53:38+00:00): Den Punkt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117764160 entfernt.
vorpalblade-kaart (2022-03-15 14:33:28+00:00): When you deleted https://osm.org/way/983659928 and https://osm.org/way/983659929, did you also intend to delete https://osm.org/relation/13217651 ?
VinkonaHB (2022-03-15 22:40:18+00:00): I did, thank you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Daniil_E (2022-02-17 09:27:06+00:00): #mapbox_contribute
mueschel (2022-03-02 17:27:13+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "door_leaf"? Ich nehme an du meinst "door:wings"?
plennert (2022-03-03 06:58:10+00:00): ja. nur a) door:wings habe ich ich nicht gefunden und b) finde ich door_leaf besser, da es sich um ein Türblatt und nicht um einen Türflügel handelt.

Danke für den Hinweis auf 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/door#Nr_of_wings:_.22door:wings.22
Leider ist dies sehr versteckt im wiki, sodass ich dies nicht gefunden habe, sonst hätte ich es vielleicht noch in Betracht gezogen.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:35:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Allison P (2022-02-17 11:00:54+00:00): This intersection has gone back and forth between being mapped as a *single point* urban interchange and whatever... this is. It's getting old. The other nearby SPUI looks nothing like this, and the way you have it set up necessitates an absurd amount of turn restrictions. I'm going to revert this.
DianaDemchuk (2022-02-17 12:31:40+00:00): Thanks for the correction and comment! A good case to avoid getting into such a situation in the future.
ma-rt-in (2022-02-17 12:41:43+00:00): Hallo,

was genau meinst du mit motor_vehicle=designated ? Wie ist den vor Ort die Beschildung?

vg
elbe5 (2022-02-17 13:30:04+00:00): Hi, die Strasse ist eine Zufahrt zum Deich und zum Schäfer in 25b. Sie ist für Fahrräder frei aber sonst nur für Anlieger. Zeitweise ist sie auch durch ein Gatter voll gesperrt.
vg
ma-rt-in (2022-02-17 13:32:24+00:00): Also so: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=250,1020-30,1022-10 ?
habi (2022-02-17 09:18:14+00:00): The 'weird' tags led me to start a discussion on a changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117134680
lyctkel (2022-06-11 18:54:33+00:00): Hi Eric V,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180421320 you used building=rte. This looks strange to me. building=rte is nowhere dokumented and used only at thit node. Did you mean building=service?
Regards,
lyctkel
Eric V (2022-06-12 13:11:09+00:00): Thank you! Correction done.
Have a nice day
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-22 00:50:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Shoulders should not be tagged separately from the main way and driveways should be tagged as driveways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117511110
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-22 00:57:04+00:00): Shoulder tag can be added to the way to indicate a wide shoulder. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shoulder
Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117705999
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117511110
BCNorwich (2022-02-18 17:14:15+00:00): The path duplicated the PRoW drawn as a track, duplicate removed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Lee Carré (2022-02-18 09:23:41+00:00): 👍
puchaczowsky (2022-02-17 15:27:39+00:00): robiąc zmiany za granicami Polski przydałoby się je opisywać w języku angielskim lub lokalnym
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-02 11:03:16+00:00): jakie jest uzasadnienie tej zmiany?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-02 11:07:49+00:00): Edycja wycofana w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118015017 z przyczyn tam podanych
ma-rt-in (2022-02-17 12:42:44+00:00): Hallo,

warum hast du hier die Zuordnung der Religion und Konfession entfernt?

vg
Norman Spirit (2022-02-17 20:14:15+00:00): Danke für die Frage. Die meisten Friedhöfe in Deutschland werden von der Kommune verwaltet, nicht von einer Kirche. Mit wenigen Ausnahmen ist der Friedhof nur für die Beerdigung von Einheimischen gedacht, und wenn sie nicht jüdisch sind, spielt ihre Religion keine Rolle. Aus Platzmangel werden die meisten Gräber nach 30 Jahren eingeebnet und spiegeln daher nur die jüngste lokale Bevölkerung wider.
aceman444 (2022-02-18 17:20:34+00:00): Zdravim, neviem ci 
je spravne davat udaje o obrubniku do stredu cesty na priechod pre chodcov. 

A na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2395575217 je aky znaceny priechod? Dokonca znacenie pre nevidiacich? Na leteckych snimkach nic nie je. Je novy?
Futur3r (2022-07-24 19:27:42+00:00): Bonjour,
tu as supprimé le bâtiment existant pour en créer un nouveau.
Il ne faut pas supprimer et recréer pour l'historique.
Il faut réutiliser l'existent.

Merci
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117511961
Fryxeel (2022-07-24 21:18:10+00:00): Bonjour, d’accord pas de soucis. C’était juste plus facile de faire comme cela, car les anciens bâtiments étaient bizzarement formé.
Vinber-Pro (2022-02-18 11:28:36+00:00): Bonjour,
que signifie refonte adressage dordogne 2022 ?
votre source c'est atd24, cela signifie quoi, une base en interne à l'atelier ?

au passage, n'hésitez pas à décrire votre profil et si vous êtes sur de la contributions organisées à renseigner une petite page wiki :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Organised_Editing_Guidelines

à plus
Futur3r (2025-12-19 15:54:37+00:00): Bonjour, 
une note a été ouverte sur une caméra que tu as cartographiée sur ce changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4816883

Peut-tu donner ça position exacte pour confirmer qu'elle existe encore ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
PantherStrix (2022-02-18 09:57:17+00:00): Hi Glibbertorsten,
mit dieser Änderung hast du aber nicht ein doppeltes Parkhaus gelöscht, sondern du hast den Gebäudeumring der Tiefgarage gelöscht und die Informationen auf die Tiefgaragen-Parkhauseinfahrt gelegt. Der Gebäudeumring war mit:
amenity=parking	
building=parking	
building:levels:underground=1	
layer	=-1	
location=underground
aus meiner Sicht korrekt gemappt.
Gruß
TheBlackMan