piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2019-08-06 22:31:09+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mbethke (2019-08-08 08:54:58+00:00): Thanks for your additions! Please don't copy the house number to "name" though. That the number is not rendered on the usual Mapnik layer is by design. Other applications like navigation apps display the number though.
eggie (2019-08-06 08:10:24+00:00): Dag Nico.. construction=house (de specificatie van building=construction)  nog verwijderen. Dat klopt niet meer.

Eigenlijk zijn adresnode import van het Kadaster. Vreemd dat dat hier ontbrak.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-06 07:58:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Het is niet helemaal goed gegaan. Editor iD plakt alles aan elkaar als je niet oppast. Linker alttoets gebruiken bij intekenen. Dan plakt het niet. 
Het pad zit geplakt aan de landuse en de landuse is mee verschoven.
Begin NOOIT met access=no
bicycle=no hoeft niet op een wandelpad.
iD wil je van alles laten invullen maar dat hoeft niet.

Je edits...https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73051854
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-06 08:03:43+00:00): Wandelpaden hebben ijna altijd een rond blauw bord met de wandelaar. Staat het bord er niet dan highway=path taggen. Daar dan wel vehicle=no toevoegen als er geen tweewielers mogen komen.
Wanneer het pad prive is dan access=private taggen. Het pad loopt verder nergens heen .. Het zal wel aan het bos vastgeplakt zitten aan het eind.
Eggie
ThijsW (2019-08-06 12:53:26+00:00): 2e edit gedaan
BCNorwich (2019-08-06 14:05:25+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I have amended your tagging of the premises. The address is listed as the company head office, is this also a bar as you have tagged it? If not please remove the tag.

Regards Bernard
Supaplex (2019-08-09 17:30:51+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Polarbear (2022-04-10 07:55:47+00:00): Hi FlorianGoslar,
du hast hier etliche man_made=manhole erfasst. 
Der Schlüssel manhole=* beschreibt dabei den Typ des Schachtes, insofern bringt manhole=yes keinerlei Informationen. 
viele Grüsse
maciek-szn (2019-08-06 08:23:39+00:00): Od jakiego czasu on nie istnieje? Na zdjęciach satelitarnych pokazujących sytuację po zmianie organizacji ruchu (czyli po wprowadzeniu minironda) widać, że on dalej funkcjonował.
maciek-szn (2019-08-06 10:24:31+00:00): Sprawdziłem w terenie - łącznik istnieje i ma się dobrze. Zmiany wycofałem.
Jrachi (2019-12-28 19:41:49+00:00): Perché in disuso?
Questa è quella nuova completamente interrata
canfe (2019-12-29 07:32:27+00:00): Andando su dal 122A si incrocia una condotta tutta arrugginita, in parte coperta da assi traballanti. Mi pare di ricordare anche sconnessa in alcuni punti, ma non son sicurissimo. La parte malconcia è sulla destra salendo.
TravGW (2019-08-06 11:16:12+00:00): Do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated.
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-08-21 03:41:43+00:00): Salut, ai putea să îți explici modificările adăugate în osm?
Radu38 (2019-08-21 04:22:27+00:00): Încă ceva mai dorești, sau asta e tot?
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-08-21 22:53:18+00:00): Repet explică pentru ce ai făcut aceste modificări care sunt cu caracter de vandalizare, în caz contrar eu te voi raporta administrației OSM pentru vandalism.
SomeoneElse (2019-08-22 22:33:42+00:00): Hello Radu38, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Andy from the Data working Group here.  Please do only add things to OpenStreetMap that really do exist.  It doesn't look like https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/LKk is real, and certainly not with a name of "gffg".
Also, please do us changeset comments that explain what you're adding, not just a random string like "tyhhjfjghmghmjghmnghmgm"
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-08-22 22:34:01+00:00): Bună ziua Radu38 și bine ați venit la OpenStreetMap!
Andy de la Grupul de lucru de date aici. Vă rugăm să adăugați numai lucruri OpenStreetMap care există cu adevărat. Se pare că https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/LKk este real, și cu siguranță nu cu un nume de „gffg”.
De asemenea, vă rugăm să ne faceți comentarii despre seturi care explică ceea ce adăugați, nu doar un șir aleatoriu, cum ar fi „tyhhjfjghmghmjghmnghmgm”
Toate cele bune,
Andy
woodpeck (2019-08-12 17:39:43+00:00): Are you sure there is a caravan site in the middle of the city?
highflyer74 (2019-08-07 16:11:58+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

In this case there are several undocumented tags on the POI. Please also be aware that OSM is case sensitive. E.g. shop=car will be recognized, shop=Car not.

A good link to read in the beginning: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask!
highflyer74 (2019-08-07 16:19:22+00:00): A short comment here: We always try to preserve data, so we rather adjust the shape or tagging of an object than deleting and adding it again, which destroys object history (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history).

Also, every feature in real life is represented by one feature in OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element). In this case there are now two schools. Once tagged on the way and once on the node.

If you need help fixing let me know :-)
gabro00 (2019-08-06 18:46:56+00:00): Tudom nem te hoztad létre, de én nem ismerek ilyen Alföld és Észak nevű tájegységet, sőt a Wiki sem:
https://hu.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kateg%C3%B3ria:Magyarorsz%C3%A1g_f%C3%B6ldrajzi_nagyt%C3%A1jai

Szerintem a linkelt lista alapján kéne felrakni.
(Frissítsd a JOSM-ot, jó régi verziót használsz :)
Domcsi (2019-08-06 20:36:41+00:00): Túl nagy jelentősége nincs,ezek nem közigazgatási határok Közép-Magyarország mint országrész se tudom hogy került bele.
Csak azért írtam vissza mert wikiben így szerepel admin_level=4 és volt egy lelkes javitgató aki átírta a régiók admin_level szintjét ami már nem mindegy mert az már közigazgatási határ.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Hungary/Boundaries

(A JOSM olyan mint a jó bor,minél öregebb annál jobb)
Carnildo (2019-08-07 08:29:14+00:00): Are you sure about the non-existence of the farmland you removed here?  Aerial imagery from this spring still shows it.
highflyer74 (2019-08-07 09:54:23+00:00): Hello klain890!

I noticed some of the relations you added here have strange tags that do not fit into the OSM tagging scheme.

Please check https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/LnW to find examples. If you need any help, just let me know!

All the best to you!
highflyer74 (2019-08-07 09:58:00+00:00): Also please adjust the source in the changeset to the actual source, as the changeset is an import, so it can not be a "survey".

Is the import documented anywhere? Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import for more details.
Mbabani Allan (2019-08-07 12:34:35+00:00): @highflyer74 Thank you for the insights. Have rectified the strange tags.

About the documentation on the central forest reserves, non has been made yet as from the source of the data.

Will engage them to develop the document
highflyer74 (2019-08-07 11:22:38+00:00): Hello!

Please check for non-OSM tags on this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6687287877. Thank you!

--------------------------------------------

Hola!

Por favor, compruebe si hay etiquetas no OSM en este nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6687287877 Gracias!
InsertUser (2019-08-06 15:37:25+00:00): Did you mean to remove most of the telephone number?
InsertUser (2019-08-06 15:41:56+00:00): Also the "Michoud Assembly Facility" seems to be a rather large building just to house a bar.
InsertUser (2019-08-06 15:58:36+00:00): Partially reverted as 73074280
Fibula (2019-08-06 16:59:23+00:00): Yes that mobile company was shut down by the govt a year ago.
Ooops, if there was an edit at  "Michoud Assembly Facility" it was in error. My searches were for 'MAF' in Juba.
InsertUser (2019-08-06 17:10:54+00:00): If the phone number is wrong it needs to be removed completely, leaving the area code behind isn't that useful.
abakus_uploader (2019-08-06 22:31:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
johnny_1982 (2019-09-22 17:40:33+00:00): Hallo, gibt es eine Quelle für die Farbangaben in den Namen? Ich frage wegen dieser Meldung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1892690
Habe mir das vor Ort mal angesehen (von außen alles weiß) und sonst keine "Farbreferenzen" gefunden.
Nibbler (2019-09-26 06:44:46+00:00): Die Quelle ist der Gebäudeplan im Eingang: Jeder Riegel hat eine Farbe zur einfachen Navigation, die Treppenhäuser sind entsprechend angemalt. Bei Terminen vor Ort wird in den Ortsangaben in der Regel auch die Farbe mit angegeben. Ob das nun Gelb oder Orange ist... Ansichtssache :) Ich würde es als dunkles Gelb #FFCC00 bezeichnen.
user_5359 (2019-08-08 13:23:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Fibula (2019-08-08 13:29:55+00:00): Ok,I wanted the carpark included with the building so our tracked vehicles can report they are at our office in that building.In hindsight i'm guessing they will identify as arriving at the nearest building so should work. Thx
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2019-08-06 11:45:45+00:00): Please, if something wrong, please, send me a message
goedegazelle (2019-08-07 13:57:43+00:00): Ik heb het nog iets verder aangepast. Op deze pagina kun je napluizen waarom ik deze wijzigingen heb gemaakt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
Joseph E (2019-09-26 13:58:05+00:00): Please don't remove the coastline from these tidal channels and estuaries in the mangroves. The coastline should not be below the mangroves, because they are salt-water, marine ecosystems. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=tidal_channel
For example, way 623885638 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623885638) is the edge of the mangroves along a tidal channel, which does not connect to any rivers. It's entirely limited to the salt-water, intertidal mangrove environment. It's incorrect to use natural=water in this case, since that tag is only for inland water bodies, not marine water.
dmgroom_ct (2019-09-27 09:46:34+00:00): Where these tidal channels meet the open sea the way had been tagged as natural=coastline, but the edge of the channel was also tagged as natural = coastline.  There there was no longer and unbroken continuos set of ways tagged as coastline, and the natural=coastline tag had to be removed from some ways .

If you look at the history of way 6623885638 you will see that you are incorrect in believing that I used the natural=water tag on this way, or any relation which this way way part of.

If you wish to continue discussion on this matter please message me rather than leaving comments on this changeset
imagico (2019-10-11 10:57:22+00:00): I think you are both right in some way: dmgroom_ct is correct that the continuity of the coastline without branching needs to be maintained at all times.  But Joseph E is right that this needs to happen in a way that represents the actual geography.  And that is not the case any more after the changes by dmgroom_ct - the coastline in this area is now a meaningless hull drawn around the actual coastline details which are drawn using natural=water polygons.  It would be good if you could change that back to the original mapping as done by Joseph E.
Joseph E (2019-10-12 00:46:08+00:00): What happened was that a previous changeset 73039521 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73039521) added natural=coastline to the ways across the mouths of the tidal channels. The user, Farras, was trying to fix some relations like the island of New Guinea multipolygon and perhaps the local government boundary relations. (I may have accidentally broken them). But Farras also added natural=coastline to ways like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623823365/history which duplicated the coastline. I appreciate that  dmgroom_ct fixed the duplication, but it would have been better to remove the coastline from 623823365 and similar, rather than from the tidal channels, which should be mapped as outside of the coastline (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=tidal_channel)

I added to the confusion by not removing the natural=water tags from many of the tidal channels when I added the coastline to them. I had been planning to propose a way to tag the water area of estuaries and tidal channels, but I can see how it can be confusing.
peter_ille (2019-08-07 21:58:09+00:00): Hi, 
do you think https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9171061 is ok? only one admin_centre and nothing more.

Regards
walter/germany
FvGordon (2019-08-10 18:37:56+00:00): I have copied the missing outline of relation 9171061 from a new created relation in changeset 73226787 and removed the new relation 9894389.
Cebderby (2019-12-12 21:43:30+00:00): Car park entrance + exit oneways reinstated, do not delete data from OSM.
mavl (2019-12-05 21:59:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
PlaneMad (2020-06-30 20:50:40+00:00): Hi Sundar, Phatehpur Sikri looks like a rather odd spelling. What is the reason to change that?
RicoElectrico (2019-08-13 16:51:02+00:00): Cześć, nie dodajemy nazw opisowych do dróg. Możesz poczytać o tym na: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_u.C5.BCywaj_tagu_name_do_opisywania_rzeczy .
user_5359 (2019-08-06 14:14:13+00:00): Hello! You add a tag "landuse"="private" to the last part of "Cotton Gin Drive". Did yo mean "access"="private"?
mapper422 (2019-08-07 13:29:32+00:00): Probably so. Thanks!
viloan (2019-08-06 11:01:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Joseph E (2019-09-26 13:52:48+00:00): dmgroom_ct,
Please don't remove the coastline from these tidal channels and estuaries in the mangroves. The coastline should not be below the mangroves, because they are salt-water, marine ecosystems. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=tidal_channel
dmgroom_ct (2019-09-27 09:51:14+00:00): Where these tidal channels meet the open sea the way had been tagged as natural=coastline, but the edge of the channel was also tagged as natural = coastline. There there was no longer and unbroken continuous set of ways tagged as coastline, and the natural=coastline tag had to be removed from some ways in order to fix the coastline.

I decided to remove the tag from the way marking the estuaries as these ways were already part of a water multipolygon and it is a duplication to have something render as both a water area and a coastline area.

If you wish to continue discussion on this matter please message me rather than leaving comments on this changeset
Joseph E (2019-10-04 02:12:08+00:00): It appears the problem with the coastline was created with changeset 73039521 by user Farras -https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73039521

But it's important to be careful before editing so many ways to remove the coastline all at once. There isn't a standard tag for estuaries, so I've been mapping them as riverbanks and coastline - this practice is pretty common in other parts of the world. In this case probably some of the water areas should actually be changed to water=tidal_channel + salt=yes + tidal=yes since some are not actually rivers (though sometimes this is debatable and would require local survey to check).
grawal (2024-03-23 16:55:56+00:00): Ciao, dovresti controllare gli errori che osmose segnala sul tuo percorso 711293506
grawal (2024-03-23 16:56:37+00:00): https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/it/map/#zoom=18&lat=45.146853&lon=7.110273&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
Hjart (2019-08-06 11:30:47+00:00): Bemærk at navnefeltet ikke bør bruges til beskrives, men udelukkende egentlige navne
user_1760129 (2019-08-06 14:23:45+00:00): -bycicle- bicycle ;-)
Cebderby (2019-12-12 21:59:31+00:00): Reverted.  Do not destroy information in OSM.
Warin61 (2019-08-09 06:24:24+00:00): I think you would be better off using JOSM. While it is a more complex editor, it makes more complex things easier. 

Fix one thing at a time - relation 9865313 has outer ways that share segments.. 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.42135&lat=-36.39257&zoom=16

The shared segments can be deleted, but you have to leave the rest of the outer ways. 

There are also overlapping areas of heath and rock ...
noisi2000 (2019-08-12 10:07:26+00:00): I will try that Editor some time. At the Moment I'm happy with id, but you are right, more complex things are getting very difficult.
The relation with the shared segments is nearly impossible to fix with id.
joost schouppe (2019-08-06 11:35:42+00:00): Thanks for adding this sports field. I've retagged it to sport=pelota, since this is the most common way to show frisian handball / kaatsen / pelotte fields in Belgium. So your field should now show up in the map of all the pelotte fields: https://www.mapcontrib.xyz/t/adc0b8-Folk_sports_in_Belgium#
michalfabik (2019-08-06 12:02:55+00:00): Pozdrav, koja je ovo vrsta objekta? "building=apartments" je građevina koja je podijeljena na stanove, tj. klasična stambena zgrada. "tourism=hostel" je ugostiteljski objekat sa krevetima u zajedničkim sobama i sa zajedničkim kupatilom, kuhinjom itd. "tourism=guest_house" je pansion". "guest_house=guest_house" ne znači ništa. Tag "tourism=*" može biti direktno na poligonu građevine (ako cijela građevina služi za tu namjenu) ili kao samostalna tačka unutar njega (ako se u građevini osim ugostiteljskog objekta nalazi još nešto drugo - privatni stanovi, prodavnica i sl.)
highflyer74 (2019-08-07 19:34:57+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please be advised that OSM is a geographic database and not meant to place advertising. You can add the company, but this is not the place to post subjective information.

In addition I would recommend to map the POI inside the building where it resides and not on the address node.

I will adjust the tags accordingly. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask.

All the best!
Truchin (2019-08-28 16:03:59+00:00): Bonjour

De ce que je lis dans le wiki, j'aurais conservé railway=miniature puisque le train en question n'est connecté à aucun réseau. Qu'en penses tu ?
Thomas
Truchin (2019-08-28 16:04:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:railway%3Dnarrow_gauge&uselang=fr
Meersbrook (2019-08-29 19:12:30+00:00): Pas faut, mais j'ai pris l'écartement et type de trains en compte ainsi que les tags utilisés pour des Chemins de Fer similaires. Alors qu'un train miniature est un train jouet qui ne va nul part, la Ligne du jardin d'acclimatation est, comme l'indique sa page Wikipedia, un chemin de fer à voie étroite. Aussi, les voitures ont s'y assoit comme dans un train, on n'est à cheval comme une scelle.
Cebderby (2019-12-12 21:26:13+00:00): Reverted.  Do not destroy information in OSM.
iWowik (2020-02-07 16:26:27+00:00): Бень добрый!
У нас народ волнуется, удалось ли забрать Саню, и вовремя ли?
korolenok (2019-08-09 14:07:10+00:00): Interesting, what is the purpose of your round parks? They are looks really strange.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73062582
cquest (2019-08-22 19:44:48+00:00): These are not parks, maybe trees, which can be mapped with a node and natural=tree

I've removed them.
Cebderby (2019-12-12 22:21:50+00:00): Reverted. Do not destroy data in OSM
Cebderby (2019-12-12 22:25:29+00:00): Reverted.  Do not destroy data in OSM.
santamariense (2019-08-06 22:05:34+00:00): Olá. Estive revisando sua edição. Parece estar tudo OK. Fique a vontade para perguntar sobre qualquer dúvida que tenhas.
Participe do grupo OSM RS no Telegram: https://t.me/osmrs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73063463
Cebderby (2019-12-12 22:34:38+00:00): Reverted.  Do not destroy information in OSM.
Leo Slager (2019-08-06 20:59:58+00:00): This is nonsens.
It is a second hands clothes shop.
I will remove your node
Cebderby (2019-12-12 22:39:29+00:00): Reverted. Do not destroy data in OSM.