piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-20 15:39:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:27:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:43:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:38:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:57:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:38:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:25:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:30:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:29:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:50:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:31:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
praeteritum (2022-08-25 06:28:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125342806.
wojie (2019-01-21 16:11:04+00:00): question: why did you delete the Confeitaria CISTER?
topolusitania (2019-01-21 17:23:35+00:00): Duplicatet tag, as explained.
wojie (2019-01-21 20:04:35+00:00): hmm.. I cant see a tag at all anymore.. if you download maps the Confeitaria CISTER dosent exist
wojie (2019-01-21 20:06:13+00:00): to me both are now deleted
luisforte (2019-01-21 21:25:45+00:00): Hi. When I face repeated features I delete the most recent, keeping the oldest and adding any new tags present in the more recent feature. Cister is best known for it's confectionery. It's also a restaurant so I added this tag to give it visibility on the osm map. 
It's the criteria of openstreetmap-carto designers that gives visibility to the features they understand are important, some disappear other become relevant; by adding the tag amenity=restaurant it will surely be visible now.
wojie (2019-01-22 15:01:03+00:00): Thanks!
praeteritum (2022-08-25 06:04:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125342005.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:56:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:43:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:31:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:32:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:50:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:30:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:43:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:30:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:54:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:59:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:46:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
giggls (2018-11-06 10:16:40+00:00): Hallo,

kannst Du diesen Changeset bitte reparieren? Der Way 305555304 ist ungetaggt.
geri-oc (2018-06-12 08:38:54+00:00): Siehe bitte einmal im Forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=703092#p703092

Das wird wohl an deinem Router liegen.

das bicycle=yes ist nicht notwendig.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:54:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
praeteritum (2022-08-24 13:07:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125315940.
praeteritum (2022-08-23 06:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125253952.
olehz (2018-09-25 08:27:50+00:00): что значит "зеленые зоны"? двор пятиэтажки - это не лес. там действительно есть парочка деревьев, но кроме того там есть заборы, проезды, какие-то огороды. давай не будем захламлять карту Львова такими "зонами"? И так уже больно много таких зон нанесли ((
mariotomo (2020-09-18 01:36:32+00:00): hola.  con este conjunto de cambios has repetido un edificio ya existente en el mapa (Joronn), creado 5 años antes por ArielRod.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-14 03:35:02+00:00): Hi, SashaMorford. I think the road (way 596645139) is unnecessary road and it's not viewed clear enough on Maxar Premium Imagery so I would deleted it.  

I also changed the classification of the roads (way 596645138, way 596645137) to be track  because there's no building on that way
kreuzschnabel (2019-03-03 18:26:26+00:00): Hallo Hermann001, bitte achte bei der Überarbeitung von Kreuzungen darauf, dass keine übersteilen Abbiegewinkel entstehen, die real nicht existieren. Bei dieser Kreuzung: https://osm.org/go/0De7j2txE?layers=N&m= musste man von der Eppsteiner Straße nach links auf die B 455 mindestens einen 140°-Winkel fahren, real ist das eine normale rechtwinklige Abbiegung. Ich hab die Kreuzung mal wieder zurechtgeschoben.
Seandebasti (2018-06-11 20:37:10+00:00): goo just for minor check
Nehaj (2018-07-25 14:26:43+00:00): Do you know this tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:irrigation%3Dpivot ?
andrewwiseman (2018-07-23 19:01:40+00:00): Thanks for mapping! However some of these roads already existed so now there are two overlapping sets. I can remove them but make sure to zoom in when mapping and make sure something isn't already mapped.
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-02-11 03:40:10+00:00): Hi Andrew2077,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/596649362). I also made some change around this changeset.
Thank you, happy mapping!
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-02-10 09:31:13+00:00): Hi mrametta,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/596649562).
Thank you, happy mapping!
dikkeknodel (2018-06-13 14:19:43+00:00): Hallo pbau,
Schon das du mit hilfst OSM in der Schweiz zu stärken. Wenn du einen highway=track umbaust nach highway=footway dann kannst du den tracktype=grade3 auch löschen weil der keine Bedeutung mehr hat.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 13:24:16+00:00): Hallo pbau,
Auf die Kanton Zürich 2014/2015 Luftbilder ist es klar das es hier ein Fahrspur ist. Hat sich das geändert, oder hast du auch hier nur Änderungen gemacht die auf dein Navi gut functionieren?
Ich habe die Änderung zurück gedreht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60151277
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
PeterBaumann (2018-06-25 23:32:54+00:00): Hallo dikkeknodel
Ich weiss inzwischen nicht mehr genau, ob ein Verbotsschild dastand oder man dort mit dem Velo einfach nicht durchfahren kann. Mir persönlich ist eigentlich egal, was in 4 Jahre alten Luftaufnahmen eingezeichnet ist, wenn ich da nicht durchkomme. Aber wer bist Du, dass Du hier eine Art OSM-Polizei spielst? Wenn Du so weitermachst, werde ich wohl auf jegliche Präzisierungen künftig verzichten und weiter schimpfen auf die Ungenauigkeit der Angaben, wenn ich welche antreffe. 
Gruss
pbau
dikkeknodel (2018-06-26 13:25:22+00:00): Hallo pbau,
Ich möchte dich nicht verärgern oder überwachen und bitte um Verzeihung. Ich möchte nur die Konsistenz von OSM in Ehren halten. Ohne Konsistenz wissen Datenverwender (Apps, Navi, etc) nicht wie man die Daten verwenden soll. Konsistenz bekommt man nur wenn versucht wird Konsens zu erreichen über wie bestimmte Sachen markiert würden. Deswegen gibt es wiki.openstreetmap.org, mit umfassende Dokumentation über erreichte Konsensen, und Mailingliste für Diskussionen über neue Sachen oder Änderungen.
Du hast aber recht das die 4 Jahre alten Luftbilder nicht notwendig die Situation heutzutage angibt. Ich habe deine Änderungen zu schnell zurückgedreht und sollte erstmals versuchen die Diskussion neu zu starten. 
Weil du es auch nicht mehr genau wusstest, bin ich heute Morgen mit meinem Velo dort hin gefahren und hab es mir angeschaut. Ich habe auch Bilder gemacht und auf Mapillary hochgeladen.
Hier siehst du dem Anfang des diskutierten Weges:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/6NUbPSisrxCCuUTWgWYE_w
Der diskutierter Weg geht bis zum Waldrand.
Das ist offensichtlich (noch immer) highway=track und nicht highway=footway (oder path) wenn der Wiki gefolgt wird (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype). Ich würde sagen track_type=grade3.
Leider sind die Bilder ab dem Waldrand miserabel, es ist mich nicht klar warum. Ab dem Waldrand ändert sich der Weg in trachtype=grade1 aber mit sehr unebem und instabilem Geröll, und geht es steil runter. Die Hohendaten zeigen etwa 25% Neigung. Wo der weg aus dem Wald komt wird es fast flach und nach der T-förmige Kreuzung geht es links kürz runter mit etwa 35%, aber dort ist asphaltiert. 
Die Verkehrsbeschränkung steht schon am Albisstrasse angegeben, Autos und Motorräder nur mit Zeil seht mann hier:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/6nP8HSIq4T1gfeqsl4iyUA
Weiter gibt es keine andere Verkehrsbeschränkungen zwischen Albisstrasse und dem Wald. Am Reppischtalstrasse gilt auch noch eine Mofa Beschränkung (Konsistenz :-S?) seht man hier: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gM6ZpFUW_6w6q2h2tKtjvw
Deswegen ist meine Meinung das der Waldweg ein Fahrspur sein soll, ohne Beschränkungen für Velos. 
Runter fahren mit dem Velo war auch kein Problem, versteh doch auch dass es schwierig ist dieser weg hochzufahren. 
Ich schlage eine Detaillierung des Waldwegs vor mit genaue angaben von Untergrund und Neigung. Die Datenverwender (Apps und Navi's) sollen diese Daten nützen zur Entscheidung ob der Weg passend ist für das Profil (Rennvelo, Mountainbike, Wanderer, etc.). 
Ich kann das machen, höre aber gern erst deine Ideen.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
datendelphin (2018-06-13 08:10:20+00:00): Hallo pbau. Das ist nicht richtig, wie du das geändert hast. Der Weg hatte bereits ein bicycle=no, was heisst das Velos dort nicht durch können. highway=footway hingegen würde ich eher in eine Stadt sehen, nicht für einen Waldweg.
dikkeknodel (2018-06-13 14:11:57+00:00): bicycle=no meint das es illegal ist dort mit dem Velo zu fahren. So nur wenn es ein Schild gibt das Velofahren untersagt soll dieser Tag verwendet werden.
Sehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
dikkeknodel (2018-06-13 14:14:43+00:00): Der mtb:scale soll verwendet werden für die Fahrbarkeit der strecke:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
PeterBaumann (2018-06-13 19:30:16+00:00): Ist ja okay, mein Problem war (und bleibt), dass das Nyon mich dort bergauf gelotst hat, was bei einem bicycle=no ja nicht passieren sollte. Jedem klar, dass das dort nicht geht. Weil das mega nervt, wollte ich dem einen Riegel schieben.
dikkeknodel (2018-06-18 10:44:52+00:00): Das ändert nichts. Wenn dein Navi die tags nicht richtig nutzt, sollst du dir beklagen beim Entwickler der App, und nicht die OSM Daten ändern sodass es in dein Navi funktioniert.
Sehe auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
dikkeknodel (2018-06-19 17:50:37+00:00): Ich habe dieser Weg heute an die Oberseite angeschaut, es gibt kein Schilt dort das Velofahren untersagt ist. 
Deswegen habe ich es geändert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59986299
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
4004 (2019-08-19 09:57:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3688564524/ а родник еще был в этом месте?
praeteritum (2022-08-23 06:18:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125253911.
streckenkundler (2018-08-07 11:28:01+00:00): Bitte Fotobelege. Ich glaube das nicht. Es gab bisher auch keine amtliche Umwidmung, veröffentlicht im Amtsblatt...
praeteritum (2022-08-23 06:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125253828.
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-12 03:09:17+00:00): Description covered it, no need to tag a name if it doesn't have a name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59754704
praeteritum (2022-08-23 06:14:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125253738.
viloan (2018-06-11 21:08:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
praeteritum (2022-08-23 06:12:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125253681.
praeteritum (2022-08-22 05:53:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125208480.
praeteritum (2022-08-22 05:41:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125208143.
praeteritum (2022-08-22 05:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125207347.
praeteritum (2022-08-22 05:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125207328.
praeteritum (2022-08-22 05:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125207239.
praeteritum (2022-08-22 05:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125207234.
eggie (2018-06-12 05:44:34+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo. Wel staan er op twee plaatsen bomen op elkaar. In het echt zal dat niet het geval zijn. :)
MVG,
Eggie
Mike409 (2018-06-11 21:56:10+00:00): source=survey,Mappillary.
user_5359 (2018-06-12 11:17:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.