piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-11-25 14:59:49+00:00): Ook hier.. de adresnode opsporen en daar bijtaggen.
binlaveloos666 (2018-11-25 18:37:36+00:00): Zal ik doen
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Nmxosm (2018-11-26 06:36:36+00:00): Ich habe den POI mit dem Gebäude zusammengeführt und die Öffnungszeiten in das OSM-Format umgeschrieben: https://www.osm.org/changeset/64885787
aaronsta (2019-01-21 05:20:35+00:00): Hi shinjiman,

Thanks for your edits,

Please make sure you are familiar with OSM mapping practices before undertaking edits.

You did things including.
Removing important tags.
Adding unnessecary tags which would prevent GPS routing on the route.
Not removing tags that you should have removed.
Breaking important relations.

As the Perth mapping community is small it can take months if not years for things to be picked up, especially if they visually appear okay.
eggie (2018-11-25 15:02:07+00:00): adres verwijderd en info samengevoegd. De je de vorige edits zelf
eggie (2018-11-25 15:03:12+00:00): Je kunt gewoon het adres verwijderen en dan sleep je de goede adresnode naar de shop en drukt op de M toets.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-11-25 15:16:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
gurglypipe (2018-11-25 18:38:20+00:00): Oops, thanks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64869516
Trevor_1 (2018-11-26 16:26:00+00:00): Por que quitaste el "Coah-2"?
bohnenstange (2018-11-28 20:39:29+00:00): Borrado accidentalmente durante la edición, lo siento
Trevor_1 (2018-11-29 16:19:56+00:00): Ok está bien
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Robert46798 (2018-11-26 09:18:08+00:00): Hallo Rotties,

willkommen zurück bei OpenStreetMap. Danke für die Ergänzung.

Du hast den Tag "amenity_1" verwendet. Im Wiki habe ich keinen Hinweis darauf gefunden. In der Datenbank gibt es ihn 3.500 mal (gegenüber 13.900.000 mal "amenity"). Meines Wissens nach soll man sich immer auf das am besten passende Tag festlegen. Ich persönlich würde daher amenity=hotel nehmen, da die meisten Hotels ein Restaurant beinhalten. Wenn man möchte könnte man dann in ein note (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:note) reinschreiben, dass es auch ein Restaurant gibt.

Als Quelle hast du die Homepage angegeben. Diese kann gerne unter dem Schlüssel "website" oder "contact:website" ergänzt werden.

Viel Spaß beim Weitermappen,
Robert
Rotties (2018-11-30 17:47:56+00:00): Hallo Robert,

danke für die Hinweise. Bin kein besonders aktiver mapper, deswegen hatte ich mich beim Eintrag an die Vorschläge des Browser-Editors gehalten. Ist jetzt entsprechend Deines Vorschlages korrigiert.

Viele Grüße, Frank
highflyer74 (2018-12-04 12:45:11+00:00): Moin ihr zwei! 

amenity_1=* etc ist leider eine bekannte Fehlfunktion des Editors "iD". Es entsteht, wenn ein Schlüssel (in diesem Fall amenity=*) bereits am Objekt vorhanden ist und man versucht, ihn nochmal einzugeben. "iD" fügt dann einfach _1, _2, _3 usw dazu. Dass dies einen Haufen Datenmüll produziert, den keine Software auswerten kann, scheint den Entwickler nicht zu interessieren. Jeder Schlüssel (key) kann pro Objekt nur einmal vergeben werden. Ich empfehle deshalb auch für neue Nutzer https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

Viele Grüße!
freebeer (2018-12-04 13:51:57+00:00): Mojn ihr drei,

i would suggest ... drawing a building outline here, tagging it as a hotel, then within it, adding a node for the restaurant.

then both can be found by a search, whether for lodging, or for fine dining / fressen.

i also second all suggestions to graduate to JOSM for serious mapping.
Polarbear (2022-08-13 22:17:34+00:00): Hallo caigner,
was ist denn ein "Kraftplatz", und inwiefern ist das eine Touristenattraktion?
caigner (2022-08-15 15:31:55+00:00): Eine Touristenattraktion ist alles, was als solche vermarktet wird. In diesem Fall wird dieser Platz als Kraftplatz auf der Webseite von Filzmoos angepriesen (einfach mal Filzmoos Kraftplätze googeln), es gibt Hinweistafeln und Wegweiser, die zu diesem Ort führen.
Daher ist es ok, solche Plätze auf der Landkarte einzuzeichnen. Manche Menschen wollen solche Plätze finden.
Polarbear (2022-08-15 16:09:21+00:00): Hallo caigner, 
ich habe doch gar nichts dagegen, dass das eingetragen wird. 
Nur ist attraction=Kraftplatz kein sinnvolles Tag, weil es erstens niemand anders kennt und es zweitens nicht den Tagging-Regeln in OSM entspricht. 
Ich hatte auch erst an einen Trimm-dich-Pfad gedacht, aber das ist es ja wohl nicht. 
landuse=recration_ground würde passen, erfordert aber das Einzeichnen der Geometrie. "Kraftplatz" kann in description.
caigner (2022-08-16 13:56:34+00:00): attraction=Kraftplatz habe ich damals gewählt, weil mir nichts besseres bekannt war. Man müßte sich ansehen, wie die Kollegen anderswo Kraftplätze eingezeichnet haben. Ich bin ja grundsätzlich kein Freund von esoterischem Mapping, aber es ist halt wirklich eine Touristenattraktion, und als solche hat der Platz eine Bedeutung. 
Deshalb halte ich tourism=attraction schon mal als richtig. Nur was trägt mal als attraction= ein?
Polarbear (2022-09-08 21:55:52+00:00): Habe es nach längerem Grübeln so umgesetzt:
  attraction = esoteric
  description = Kraftplatz
  name = Der Reinigungsplatz
  tourism = attraction
  url = https://www.filzmoos.at/de/aktivitaeten/sommer/kraftort-filzmoos.html
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Irvan Salim (2018-12-01 14:16:23+00:00): This work is done in cooperation with #GISCorps
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:21:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Константин Гам (2019-04-28 18:57:28+00:00): Делая "детализацию" не надо пожалуйста ломать навигацию и сносить светофоры!
mini-me (2019-04-28 20:27:25+00:00): Не припоминаю, чтобы когда-нибудь сносил светофоры. Во всяком случае специально. Про какой светофор речь?
Константин Гам (2019-04-29 11:58:53+00:00): в данном пакете правок их не так много. А лучше делать пакеты поменьшк и комментарий получше, тогда не будет проблемы понять о чем речь
mini-me (2019-04-29 12:38:35+00:00): Если речь про
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2393494520/history
то я не понимаю, почему вы ставите highway=traffic_signals на пешеходном переходе. Эта комбинация ставится на пересечениях автомобильных дорог.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
Константин Гам (2019-04-29 17:59:20+00:00): Вы почитайте о том как роутеры работают. И оригинал статьи. данный тег ставят на светофоры для авто. В данном случае отдельностоящего перехода в одной точке и то и то. 
Если этот тег убрать, вы портите правильность расчёта маршрута по данным улицам, что легко заметить просто проведя тесты или открыв исходники osrm хотя бы
mini-me (2019-04-29 20:50:48+00:00): Ок, понял
Mtngy (2022-03-28 21:23:41+00:00): Gibt es diese Baustelle noch? laut Bing Orthofoto ist dort Wiese zu sehen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/64871105
mavl (2018-12-25 00:15:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
gsa (2019-01-19 18:03:02+00:00): If you add the "ele" tag to a peak, please make sure that the elevation is in metres, not in feet.
Irvan Salim (2018-12-01 14:15:38+00:00): This work is done in cooperation with #GISCorps
eggie (2018-11-25 17:34:12+00:00): Top!
Jakka (2018-11-26 14:14:56+00:00): verbinding pad richting tunnel voor foot and bicycle OK éénmaal uit tunnel geen bicycle meer toegevoegd aan de footway ?
mbethke (2018-11-26 06:34:42+00:00): Hi,
using area=yes for buildings doesn't work, they need some physical tags. building=yes or more specifically building=house would do here. I just fixed it.

cheers,
Matthias
Hjart (2018-11-26 16:18:57+00:00): Please do not convert valid tags to the contact: scheme. It's not better.
thetornado76 (2018-11-29 20:52:33+00:00): I had only changed it in connection with the correction of the shop tags.
Hjart (2018-11-29 20:59:07+00:00): Yes, I saw that. Please don't convert in those cases either
DavidKewley (2018-11-26 06:47:36+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64886184 because instead of placing a new business node in the correct location, a street was turned into the business.
chnav (2018-11-25 18:51:18+00:00): Пожалуйста не пишите в названиях форму собственности типа ТОО, а также прочие статусные части типа "магазин", "остановка" и т.д. Спасибо.
viloan (2018-11-25 18:00:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Darpan Singh (2018-11-25 18:04:33+00:00): Please put DTU Lake on map.
VA00 (2019-07-16 19:44:27+00:00): Dziś nie znalazłem przejścia przez rów :-( Pogubiłem się w trzcinach.
GPLV2 (2018-11-26 11:01:17+00:00): Hallo Patrick,

Ik heb de parking tags wat gecorrigeerd.  addr:street moet in feite een officiele straatnaam zijn, als de parking een echte naam heeft kan je die gebruiken, maar wat jij erin had gezet is eerder een omschrijving van het gebruik, daarom heb ik dit naar 'description' gemigreerd.  Welcome bij OSM belgie, bedankt voor de contributie.  Je kan ons online vinden op dit chat kanaal :  https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org
Stadtigel (2018-11-26 16:44:39+00:00): Hallo Gorn!
The “European long distance path E3” is an official hiking trail of the European Rambler Association through Czech Republic. You destroyed in this changeset the relation of the “European long distance path E3” (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6177257) between Klínovec and Tisá. (Please look http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=6177257) 
Why do you do it? It was a big work to completed this relation!
Bert
gorn (2018-11-27 11:38:39+00:00): Thanks for heads up. I will have a look at it in the afrenoon and clean it up, if there was any mistake.
gorn (2018-11-27 21:08:36+00:00): Ok, so this is what happened. By no means I am trying to destroy historic work, done by others (incl. myself). I am trying to separate E3 to managable chunks and put them to superrelation - something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/371740 ... I put the "deleted" part straight back in form of subrelation ...  it goes hand by hand with fact that in CZ european trails reuse existing Czech trails, therefore it makes sanse to represent European route as superrelation containing these Czech national trails. I am in the middle of work an hopefully it will make more sense as I continue. Feel free to message me if you have any questions.
gorn (2018-11-27 21:19:59+00:00): BTW look at the actual state at https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=6177257&map=9!50.4541!13.4125 it looks in very good shape
Stadtigel (2018-11-27 22:21:22+00:00): Thank you for your answer. In my opinion ist your new solution not optimal, it should be only a "workaround". A "way" can belong to different "relations". In a "superelation" should be only parts with the same name like the superelation. "Waymarkedtrails.org" ist not the unique application of Openstreetmaps. For example "Wanderreitkarte.de" have a problem with relations names different as the superrelation, i think. Do you understand?
Stadtigel (2018-11-27 22:23:09+00:00): Correction: For example "Wanderreitkarte.de" have a problem with relations NAMED different as the superrelation, i think.
gorn (2018-11-27 23:03:03+00:00): Yes I understand that and I will think about your first argument. My first reaction is that in Czech republic ALL EU trails are only union of national trails and reuse their markings. Therefore it makes sense to make them dependant like that do not you thinks so?
gorn (2018-11-27 23:03:15+00:00): About the second argument - most of European trails are separated to superrelations, so the Wanderreitkarte.de will have the same problem How do they solve it in this case.
gorn (2018-11-27 23:04:33+00:00): You may have a look at my recent edits - I have separated the appropriate trails in eastern part of E3 - at the same time I am checking if the E3 is correctly marked using the photos of guideposts in our photo database.
gorn (2018-11-27 23:13:58+00:00): Observation: I have briefly searched several superrelations and I have not found a case where the subrelation and superrelation would have a same name. Can you give me some guidance on this?
Stadtigel (2018-11-28 17:04:01+00:00): Thank you for the repair of E3! I will wait 2 or 3 weeks for the next update of "Wanderreitkarte.de" and its errorlist. Then we can continue our discussion.
Stadtigel (2018-11-28 17:19:00+00:00): If you continue including of Czech trails: Including all parts direct in “European long distance path E3 - part Czech Republic” (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/83249) would be very clearer (and better as a superrelation of a superrelation of a superrelation).
gorn (2018-11-28 23:14:50+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, it is probably good idea to remove one level of this hierarchy, you are right in this. Let me know if you have more on this later on. If I do not react here, please send me a message.
b-jazz (2018-11-25 18:11:43+00:00): Wrong changeset comment. Should be "Fixing up ways that intersect with themselves/others"
theophrastos (2018-11-27 06:28:53+00:00): Hallo,

warum hast du einen neuen Knoten angelegt, anstatt den bereits vorhandenen Gebäudeumriß entsprechend zu ergänzen. Jetzt ist die Kirche nämlich in den OSM-Daten doppelt vorhanden.

MfG
dikkeknodel (2018-11-25 18:26:40+00:00): changeset comment is incorrect copy from previous CS. I adapted routing here to gpx and added a track
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2019-08-06 18:04:51+00:00): Hej, jeg har rettet en del af dine hastighedsgrænser. Vær opmærksom på, at de blå firkantede skilte med hvide tal ikke er hastighedsgrænser men oplysningstavler med anbefalet hastighed. Det tagges som maxspeed:advisory.

Så typisk vil det blive fx maxspeed=50, maxspeed:advisory=40

I StreetComplete kan man også angive anbefalede hastigheder.
mavl (2018-11-26 16:32:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за участие в проекте OpenStreetMap.  
Этот пакет правок сдвигает довольно много объектов на несколько метров.  
Вы сдвигаете спутниковые снимки под GPS-треки?  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2
ishimwarrior (2018-11-26 17:50:13+00:00): Добрый вечер, к сожалению нет, под GPS-треки выровнить не получается, слишком большое смещение у предыдущих правок, стараюсь выровнить каждый квартал по границам уже нарисованных дорог.