piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Note_Fixer (2022-07-03 22:07:18+00:00): https://imgur.com/y7n0uK0
https://imgur.com/hlNAdTS
https://imgur.com/6TEEMBe
https://imgur.com/Ugzo9hI
https://imgur.com/g3HyK9A
https://imgur.com/GgWj749
https://imgur.com/zQaiiyk
https://imgur.com/OgIH88u
https://imgur.com/UZkXjrK
https://imgur.com/2ALWycP
https://imgur.com/k82kAbd
Mashin (2022-07-04 08:55:41+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for improving OSM. Just one thing that I noticed, please don't delete mapped driveways. These are valid data should be kept in OSM.
user_12470424 (2022-07-04 19:17:16+00:00): Certain driveways I’ve been deleting if they are not long enough to be driven on to get to the house, if it makes sense. I’ve also been fixing driveways associated with traffic island dead ends since there is an island separating from one side to the other.
Mashin (2022-07-04 19:25:10+00:00): Ok, if you know that a driveway is not to be used for delivery or general traffic, then you can add `access=private` tag which should prevent routing software to navigate through that section.
Vinber-Pro (2022-07-21 16:52:26+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne pense pas que le projet mapcontrib que vous avez construit soit correcte, aucun tag OSM.

Et les éléments que vous avez ajouté ici ne sont pas corrects, j'efface.

Si vous avez besoins de discuter de tout cela, n'hésitez pas à poser des questions ou à tenter d'aller discuter sur le forum https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

Bonne journée
L'imaginaire (2022-07-05 09:45:28+00:00): Hi Ruettet,
Thanks for making these edits!

One tip: it's better to tag images on Wikimedia Commons like this:

wikimedia_commons=File:Stolperstein für Georges Marechal (Brussels).jpg

See the explanation on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons

Keep on mapping!
L'imaginaire (2022-07-05 09:45:52+00:00): (I've already edited this one)
ivanbranco (2022-12-03 18:11:28+00:00): Why did you delete the building?
ks1v (2023-02-13 01:25:34+00:00): sorry, I might incorrectly find at the place it was demolished during renovation of cable car station
eggie (2022-07-04 05:04:05+00:00): Dag AdB  Hier kun je zien waar ook onbedoeld is geplakt.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123164636

MVG
eggie
Agterdenbos (2022-07-07 20:43:19+00:00): Dankjewel voor de link. Ik zie hier rode en groene lijnen. Hoe moet ik dit beeld interpreteren?
eggie (2022-07-07 20:49:04+00:00): Linksonder zie je leganda (Legend) Die even openklikken. Daar staat de uitleg van wat je met een bepaalde lijn hebt gedaan.
geel is bv nieuw..
groen alleen aangeraakt (dus effect op de kaart) of verplaatst. enz. Het spreekt voor zich.
Je kunt als je de link van achavi opslaat en steeds je changesetnummer invult in de url je eigen werk analyseren. 
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-07-07 20:54:30+00:00): typo legenda.. 
Verder
klik op de lijn. Dan zie je wat je hebt veranderd in een box. Ook zie je wie de voorgaande mapper was.
Agterdenbos (2022-07-07 21:23:56+00:00): Dat snap ik. Maar hoe zie ik dan vlug waar lijnen, punten of vlakken onbedoeld aan elkaar geplakt zitten?
eggie (2022-07-07 21:42:49+00:00): Dan zie je een verbindingsnode zoals in het midden rechtsonder. De rode lijnen zijn  de oorspronkelijke polygonen.
Het plakken is geen ramp.. maar geeft problemen als een andere mapper iets verschuift. Onbedoeld komt de rest mee.
bxl-forever (2022-07-04 16:52:26+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding such data, and the pictures are nice and useful.

I changed the tags here; you might be interested to know there is a tag to link to Wikimedia Commons directly.

Hope this helps.

Happy mapping!
mueschel (2022-07-04 08:16:29+00:00): Please use lower case letters in values, e.g. 'yellow' instead of 'Yellow'.
Leo Slager (2022-07-03 22:46:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Stone_X (2022-07-04 18:10:34+00:00): Glorietta też jest poprawną nazwą lecz rzadziej używaną. Na mapie przy wejściu do parku tak właśnie jest ta altanka nazwana.
Hanys1871 (2022-07-04 19:11:35+00:00): 'Glorieta' to polska nazwa, którą użyto m.in. w wikipedii, dlatego też uznałem ją za poprawną, ale skoro tak jest na mapie to widocznie przypadkiem czy też nie, ma ona dwie nazwy.
eggie (2022-07-04 04:53:04+00:00): Dag Agterdenbos..  Editor iD heeft de neiging om alles aan elkaar te plakken. Eén grasstrook zat geplakt aan de landuse =residential van Goirle... vandaar de grootte van de changeset.  Die heb ik losgemaakt.
Plakken kunnen voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
MVG
eggie
Agterdenbos (2022-07-07 20:41:31+00:00): dankjewel voor je feedback!
FasterTracker (2022-07-06 01:18:45+00:00): Boa noite!
Seja bem-vind@ ao OSM.

Podes esclarecer o que fizeste nesta edição?

Cumprimentos,
FT
WoodWoseWulf (2022-07-04 01:56:57+00:00): Hello,

Noting that you have added a park in this general area several times over the past few years, primarily over the adjacent house, and that this house is listed on other services as being associated with a business by the name Brayack Media. For the time being, I have changed this community garden to allotments... but do you have any evidence that this community garden actually exists?
MxxCon (2022-07-04 01:23:01+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features with right angles, such as buildings, after you draw them you can right-click on them and select "Make Square" (shortcut key Q). That will make your mapping look neater, and where appropriate, more accurate to the real world. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123166477
Hufkratzer (2022-07-04 09:55:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075614049 looks more like a riding arena (jumping arena) than a riding centre in the aerial view. If this is true it should be tagged as pitch (sport=equestrian).
aceman444 (2022-07-04 15:25:20+00:00): Thank you. But I can't judge that. I just moved the tags from the larger area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91862596/history) to the smaller one which looks like the one used for equestrian sports of some type, while the larger area is more for horse keeping.
Hufkratzer (2022-07-04 18:21:52+00:00): I think this was a bad idea. Did you have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag=leisure=horse_riding ? It says: "The tag is for the whole area which may contain one or more riding arenas, stables, riding halls, other related buildings or paddocks". I think the tag leisure=horse_riding was correct on the larger area and the riding arena (the smaller area where equestrian sports takes place) should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian; this is how it's usually done; compare the examples on the wiki page for horse_riding and also on the wiki page for pitch (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena.). If you want to add landuse=animal_keeping to leisure=horse_riding, I don't care, it doesn't hurt. But tagging a riding arena with leisure=horse_riding is like tagging a tennis court with leisure=sports_centre.
aceman444 (2022-07-04 20:23:53+00:00): Ah ok then, if horse_riding is for the whole facility, then you are right. I will fix it, thanks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:26:17+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9864725666/history
kcnorthlander42 (2022-10-10 19:30:35+00:00): Thank you for letting me know, Mateusz.  I'll check out that thread (and the mailing list in general, looks very handy!) and comment if I don't agree it.
Enock4seth (2022-07-03 23:29:30+00:00): Too bad I hit enter too quick, no comment :/; Landschaftpark Nord Duisburg bench survey
MxxCon (2022-07-04 01:26:18+00:00): Hello.
Wouldn't it be more accurate to tag this as landuse=grass or flowerbed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123167179
WoodWoseWulf (2022-07-04 00:11:41+00:00): For additional reference, see changesets 55529021 (4 years ago) 74274347 (3 years ago) 82004597 (2 years ago) in which the same mapper added a similar park feature over the adjacent house, and then proceeded to expand/readd it with each revision it.
cserpell (2022-07-04 00:54:03+00:00): Hola, gracias por los aportes. Hice una corrección a los semáforos que habías editado, ya que estaban antes y después de las esquinas. En general se ubican solo donde se detienen los autos. Puedes revisar aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals

En la versión en inglés hay ejemplos más detallados: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahighway%3Dtraffic_signals

En cuanto a los cruces peatonales de un cruce semaforizado, se pueden etiquetar como highway=crossing y crossing=traffic_signals.

Saludos,
Big Frank (2022-07-04 02:55:55+00:00): Entendido cserpell, gracias por el informe. Saludos.
-Big Frank
Supaplex (2022-07-04 01:56:10+00:00): Hi, 

Your changeset spread across two countries, could you split into at least two changeset?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123168132
timbal (2022-07-04 08:21:45+00:00): Hey!
Sorryy I used maps.me for adding the locations, I don't know how to split the commit.
VLD189 (2022-07-27 21:09:33+00:00): Hello tacosrgud, 
I was just curious about the name change of the road. You have deleted the previous which is also a tiger name (Jamison Street) and added a new name (Figg Street). I believe you have some solid source behind this change. It will be great you share that source in the discussion. If you have any questions or would like to reach out, please feel free to do so. Thank you so much!
BCNorwich (2022-07-05 08:17:07+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to let you know that you've inadvertently added bridge=yes and layer=1 to 4km of highway, Way: 364596862 and Way: 1075628524. A 4km long bridge!?

No worry though I've sectioned off the actual bridges and removed the bridge tags from the ordinary road sections.

Regards Bernard.
mburmeister (2022-07-04 02:15:57+00:00): Forgot to add sources: Local Knowledge, Aerial Imagery.
highflyer74 (2022-07-04 06:32:42+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

A few remarks:

Please always use good changeset comments that reflect what you did. Also be so kind so keep your changes local per changeset (this one is spanning across the Atlantic).

A good read for you as a starting point:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

- https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Thank you!
Warin61 (2022-07-19 00:48:34+00:00): Reverted.
Manuel Alejandroo (2024-07-17 23:13:02+00:00): Amigo el CEPEM QUEDA AL LADO DE EL SALADO LO QUE SE LLAMA ERRONEAMENTE AQUI EL CARMELO Autorice LA corrección de los nombres , saludos
kcnorthlander42 (2022-07-04 06:22:38+00:00): Why are there so many changes on a single submission, and all unrelated?  This looks very suspicious.
SekeRob (2022-07-04 11:08:29+00:00): Turbopass reveals there's these many parkings in Eugene/California and then also few on Nantucket island on the east coast AND one in Sicily, Italy Anyone who can wrap the head pan around this? WHY in the first edit did this have to be and for every mapper in between to see this? Welcome, and is there Hope, Harry, you wont do this again on such a large geographical spread?

caio from Italy
b-jazz (2022-07-04 16:08:35+00:00): People need to stop blaming the users for edits like this. Yes, it is inconvenient, but get over it, it happens. Pressure the tools to put up roadblocks when someone tries to create a changeset that is this large. Especially when it is a new user doing it. Let's stop criticizing new users and start criticizing the maintainers of iD/JOSM/etc.
Mundilfari (2022-07-06 00:01:43+00:00): I second what b-jazz says. 

To me, the only thing more annoying than world-spanning edits messing with review filters, is world-spanning edits with dozens of comments that make it look like there's some weird-ass controversy going on, when all it really is is just the same (handful of people's) mimimi over and over and over again...
SekeRob (2022-07-06 06:45:37+00:00): To close off this descending conversation, many times communicated as comment to large geographical area covering edit sets, sharing link to the OSM wiki page discussing the 'keeping it small' and the reason, not mentioning that eventually it will attract mini mimimi inserts too.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset See sub topic
"Geographical size of changesets: General recommendation: changesets should be local."

The here and now is, that it's been discussed at the highest programmer levels and no technical solution has been found. A question of awareness.. If anyone has one, please contribute. 

have a nice day.
b-jazz (2022-07-06 15:27:00+00:00): > no technical solution has been found

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOTyUfOHgas

Seems pretty easy to me. Editors could simply have a feature that pops up a warning when someone is about to submit a globe-spanning changeset. I submitted a changeset in my early days that spanned the globe. I didn't realize it was a problem. I submitted one in the recent past knowing full well that it shouldn't be done, but I didn't realize I was doing it. Just letting the user know they are about to make one would go a LONG way to solving the problem.
Mundilfari (2022-07-07 00:23:12+00:00): > Just letting the user know they are about to make one would go a LONG way to solving the problem. 
Precisely. If the individuals getting super offended by huge change sets just used half the time they use to flame beginners who don't know any better (or people who accidentally uploaded a huge change set) to push for solutions within the editors, we'd probably be much further along.
I had pitched a similar idea in another one of these flame wars almost a year ago. Surprisingly enough (or not), none of the individuals who tend to complain about huge change sets loudly and frequently (and, often on the borderline of just being rude) appeared to have any interest in pushing for any of that in any editor whatsoever. Go figure.
It just doesn't look like most the complainers actually care too much for a solution, but more like they're looking for a place to vent (troll?).

@SekeRob - curious about your wiki-edit on this matter - would you mind adding a sentence or two on how one would achieve that in JOSM?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SomeoneElse (2022-07-06 11:24:02+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you created a gap in the Jubilee Way.  Before:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jVd
After:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jVe
Looking at the imagery, it looks like there is a path through.
Turn on GPS traces, and you can see that a bit of GPS traces matches the OS OpenData StreetView.  Of the other imagery Bing isn't much help but Esri and Maxar do show something a little to the west of the GPS trace.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-07-09 11:11:38+00:00): Hello,
I've remapped this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123395426 and added a bit more detail to the immediate area in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123395629 .
There's lots more that can be done.
Best Regards,
Andy
VLD518 (2022-07-29 11:06:46+00:00): Hello Mihaita Mandea. Can you please  give us more info about why you made this edit?
Thank you!
Tomas Straupis (2022-07-04 09:14:17+00:00): Nereikia keisti teisingai pažymėtų landuse=basin ar landuse=reservoir. Iš principo nereikia klausyti JOKIŲ iD „patarimų“ - beveik visi jie neteisingi :-)
Frans S (2022-08-26 08:20:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123171949
eggie (2022-07-04 06:13:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Weet je zeker dat hier een camping is zonder naam?
Gebruik als het even kan de bestaande adresnodes.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-04 06:17:06+00:00): Het kunstwerk MetCaracter heb je midden op een gebouw geplaatst Klopt dat wel?
Pobeer in het vervolg ook het gebied van je edits kleiner te houden. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-04 06:37:00+00:00): Tagging Met Caracter heb ik aangepast.
eggie (2022-07-05 12:53:01+00:00): De 'camping' is aangepast...  Het is geen camping in de zin van.....
MVG
eggie
PT-53 (2022-07-04 07:46:17+00:00): Hallo fx99,
bei dieser Sitzbank
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9865038012
und den anderen
hast Du wohl versehentlich das Merkmal
- check_date=2021-09-07
mitkopiert.
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-07-12 12:07:05+00:00): Hallo fx99,
ich habe gerade noch das falsche check:date an den restlichen Sitzbänken gelöscht.
Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
bxl-forever (2022-07-04 10:12:19+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for the objects you added here.

I do not know much about Go Map!! but do you think you can program it to use another source of aerial imagery?

In the last days, I had to move several of your "amenities" because they were off by a few meters, sometimes being drawn in the middle of roads.

Preferably UrbIS aerial imagery, or AIV Flanders as a second choice, instead of Bing Aerial.

Thanks.
sensien (2022-07-04 12:06:11+00:00): Hi,
My apologies if some nodes have not been in the correct place! I do try my best to ensure they are ok, GPS being GPS it does try and make me place things in the wrong place. Unfortunately I don't see any way to change the imagery service within GoMap. Is there another app I should try?
best
Mark
bxl-forever (2022-07-07 15:11:57+00:00): Hi,

I asked fellow mappers about this.  It looks like other people reported the same problem (https://github.com/bryceco/GoMap/issues/32).  Sadly, there is very little hope to have it fixed in the short term.

A—possibly cumbersome—option would be to keep uploading objects through the app and later in the day review your work in the online editor, where you can use "CIRB/CIBG most recent aerial imagery".

I am not very knowledgeable about iOS apps.  The wiki has a few pages about apps:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:IOS_software
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_iOS_applications

OsmAnd is considered to be very powerful (but is not easy to learn).  MAPS.me is considered awful.  No idea about other apps.
sensien (2022-07-08 09:18:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for that.
When you say "..review your work in the online editor, .." which online editor do you mean?
I am aware of map distortions etc but certainly not in any way any kind of expert! I am leaving for the summer in a few days so will not have tome to look into this any more unfortunately. 

Mark
bxl-forever (2022-07-08 12:16:46+00:00): Hello,

On the openstreetmap.org website, you can hit the Edit button and select "Edit with iD (in-browser editor)".

For small tasks such as relocating benches or waste baskets, this will be fine.

(The editor selects AIV Flanders by default once it is loaded; you can change the background imagery and select "CIRB/CIBG most recent aerial imagery" instead, to get perfectly calibrated high-res pictures in the whole Brussels Region.)
sensien (2022-07-08 12:24:17+00:00): Ah yes, I have occasionally used that also, just wasn't sure if I was missing a better option! I wasn't aware I could swap the aerial view so that helps.
From now on I will try and check!
Thanks again
sensien (2022-07-09 09:44:13+00:00): Just to say thanks again for that aerial imagery swap tip. It's so much better than the default (?) one!
Frans S (2022-07-09 10:56:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123174172
Kovoschiz (2022-07-04 08:08:10+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`. That's for proper names only. OSM is not a printed map. Use `description:en=` + `description:zh=`.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
user_8101879 (2022-07-04 12:35:21+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14320509 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards