piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2022-05-11 15:07:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет номера домов, в которых указаны маленькие буквы (118б).  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059016907  
  
В российской части OpenStreetMap принято использовать большие буквы (118Б).  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses
MrPra5e (2022-05-11 15:15:57+00:00): Добрый вечер. Принято, исправлю.
jeslop (2022-05-10 20:45:04+00:00): Saludos Pau86.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres

Lo corrijo.
mariotomo (2022-05-10 22:17:48+00:00): hola! he estado intentando poner ejemplos de retornos realizados con turn:lanes … ustedes de Kaart quieren seguir el ejemplo?  nos elimina las restricciones de giro.  ahora así como está este retorno, puede ser utilizado mal por los software de routing.
whatmeinfallible (2022-05-12 23:26:06+00:00): Saludos,
Actualmente no estamos editando de forma proactiva los turn:lanes, pero tendremos cuidado de no perturbar los turn:lanes existentes. Gracias por ponerse en contacto!
Mashin (2022-05-10 20:54:15+00:00): Hi, you just removed tag that marked this area as a golf course. Please be more careful next time.
SAN00 (2022-05-11 13:28:30+00:00): Das geht über das Hanseviertel Ost hinaus.
FlyingWitchDog (2022-05-10 18:24:06+00:00): Hope that 'social_facility' is the correct attribute to use for a seamen's club catering to crews/officers from vessels docked at the nearby port, offering counselling, telephone&internet access as well as the possibility to interact with fellow seafarers.
mariotomo (2023-05-04 18:17:20+00:00): hola "Kaart"! you set "highway=pedestrian" for a  foot bridge over the Panamericana. it looks really weird. have you done this in other occasions? please review, thanks.
user_5359 (2022-05-11 09:09:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/65274538/history. What is the meaning of the tag ;it=yes?
SomeoneElse (2022-05-11 18:24:09+00:00): Thanks!  "lit" of course.
GartenStuhl (2022-05-11 11:15:13+00:00): Hier ging was schief... :)
luin132 (2022-05-10 17:56:54+00:00): I adjusted an overlapping* section of unclassified road and path. #kaart 2022
jleedev (2022-05-16 19:21:38+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121066451
archpdx (2022-07-20 07:17:07+00:00): Hi,
It appears that many of the websites you added in this changeset have Google Maps tracking parameters (ie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996794298). Please note that you can not use anything from Google Maps to add or edit data in OSM, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
Allison P (2022-07-20 22:34:38+00:00): Also, the tracking parameters should not be included in the URL. They are useless.
Dark_Valor (2023-02-04 21:22:42+00:00): I stopped using that for a source.  I realized what I was doing and stopped.  I agree about the tracking parameters not needing to be removed since I use better and usable sources.
ma-rt-in (2022-05-10 18:25:53+00:00): sry für das riesen CS, habe da wohl mal wiede eine Einstellung versaut.
Ich habe hier mehrer Quellen genutzt:
Notes, websites, fragdenstaat.de, Luftbilder lokalen Anbieter in JOSM nutzbar und lokales wissen.
alester (2022-05-11 03:33:56+00:00): Only the northeastern part of this area is Promenade Park. The southwestern portion is a separate, undeveloped lot with the address 499 Royal Bay Drive. I've restored the park to its correct size.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
ivanatora (2022-05-11 05:07:26+00:00): Please don't add things "all over the world" in one changeset. Use smaller localized changesets which are more easy to manage and not trigger fire alarms in every mapper in the uploaded boundary.
marczoutendijk (2022-05-11 11:41:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5990

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
mavl (2022-06-09 13:20:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
CartoKees (2022-05-13 18:38:48+00:00): Hoi dvdhoven,
ik wilde een gebouw met adressen toevoegen (luchtfoto 2022). Dit voetpad (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059042648) zou dan dwars door het gebouw lopen. Dat is niet handig. Ik heb geen idee waar het voetpad heen te verplaatsen. Weet jij wat handig is te doen met het voetpad? Of wat de ligging van de route zou moeten zijn?Alvast bedankt.

Met vriendelijke groet,

CartoKees
dvdhoven (2022-05-14 08:40:40+00:00): Een andere mapper, skywave, heeft daar rücksichtlos allerlei wegen verwijderd en daarbij de routes onderbroken. Ik heb daarvoor een pad ingetekend.
Ik heb nu maar een andere omleiding bedacht, Visit Brabant heeft niets in de aanbieding

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Lejun (2022-05-11 06:29:29+00:00): Par curiosité c’est modifié sur quelle base/source ?
canfe (2022-05-11 04:44:12+00:00): No, il name non può avere assolutamente tali valori.
Paese, via e civico vanno ognuno con la sua chiave e abitazione non può essere usato in quanto nome generico e non proprio.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120807465
Carnildo (2022-05-11 03:28:54+00:00): I've reverted this changeset.  It's too large for any of the QA tools to handle properly, but changing Burlington High School from a school to a nuclear explosion site suggests that it was not made in good faith.
marczoutendijk (2022-05-11 11:29:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5987

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:58:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714052, 143714026, 143714035, 143714023 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
wkdgs (2022-05-11 09:43:10+00:00): Hier siehst du wie du es eintragen kannst:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed:conditional
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120807549
Austrianton (2022-05-12 13:27:28+00:00): Please keep individual edits local, as to avoid spamming the history feed all over the world.

Thanks
felipeeugenio (2022-05-10 20:36:45+00:00): Hola Felipe.
Por favor sientente libre de preguntar sobre el uso de ciertos tags, ya que esta es una vía exclusiva para bomberos y la dejaste de uso común. Qué tenía de malo la que estaba antes?

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120807806
felipe77° (2022-05-10 22:28:35+00:00): Agradecido de los comentarios.

Mi razón es que actualmente utilizamos un despachador con mapa usando api de OSM. Nuestro problema que es esa vía no permite la circulación como indicaciones para nuestros vehículos de emergencia, por lo cual nos está generando rutas más extensas y aumento en el tiempo de respuesta.

Gustoso estoy de aportar al OSM y dejo mi numero de teléfono para poder explicar de mejor manera los cambios que estoy tratando de implementar para los organismo de emergencia de nuestra ciudad.
felipeeugenio (2022-05-10 22:34:01+00:00): Ok. Or favor ingresar al chat para plantear el problema. Hay bomberos en el chat
felipe77° (2022-05-10 22:39:21+00:00): Acabo de ingresar, muchas gracias.
osmviborg (2022-05-11 05:49:34+00:00): Hej. Stien er markeret 'access=private', så den bliver ikke brugt af route programmer. 'Nordsøstien' er flyttet til stien på stranden.
Lejun (2022-05-11 06:28:50+00:00): Je cache pas mon plaisir à voir des changesets avec plein de trottoirs. Prochaine étape c’est les ressauts[1] !

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:kerb
janolezab (2022-05-10 20:13:21+00:00): The description is not very talkative. What did you want to achieve with this changesets?
moje_konto (2022-05-10 20:19:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059053584
Are you sure that's a beach? Doesn't really match with Bing which you listed as source.
moje_konto (2022-05-10 20:58:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059053581
Or farm?
limes11 (2022-05-10 21:00:47+00:00): He is adding random stuff all over the world, rivers in Togo, cliffs in Canada, farmland and ruins on some islands in the pacific - Honestly, I would probably just revert all his changesets. Can't see a valuable contribution.
マァㇻブcㇰl@ホッマイl。チョ。ウk (2022-05-10 21:32:37+00:00): Hola.
¿Alguna pista?
puma515 (2022-05-10 23:08:15+00:00): +1 for revert. 
Only according to satbild you can map landscape or building but only those who can be clearly identified. Here, however, as with the examples with the beach on the lonely island which consists of only one mountain or the farmland in the middle of the forest just wrong.  Also who you look at his other edits seems to fit here a lot of things See also the comments in the 1 Changset from 8 days ago which he probably ignores.
marczoutendijk (2022-05-11 11:41:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5990

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Laveure (2022-05-14 03:58:59+00:00): Clown
Glassman (2022-05-12 22:42:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good - although driveways are by definition private so adding the access=private isn't really needed. I only recommend it if there is a sign posted or a locked gate.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120808560
iantaylor1 (2022-05-12 22:46:17+00:00): Thanks.
I was puzzled because none of the other driveways are included.
Should they be added or should this be deleted?
iantaylor1 (2022-05-12 22:47:02+00:00): I mean at this location, 105th Ave SE
Glassman (2022-05-12 22:50:36+00:00): I'd leave it. Amazon has been adding driveways but mostly in rural areas. But I know people that add driveways to residential area. I've add mine.  The second driveway you added is a good example of one that is needed. It's not always clear how to get to a house or building when they are set away from the main roads.
Enock4seth (2022-06-09 10:23:53+00:00): Hi,
How did you come up with this turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14126376 ? Kindly explain.
KevinWalshe (2022-06-10 15:18:59+00:00): Hello, I used mapillary streetview imagery.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=5.5576111748866&lng=-0.18242390826367&z=17&pKey=826181784772492&focus=photo
Enock4seth (2022-06-10 16:02:52+00:00): Thank you for the clarification, didn't notice there. 
I would also recommend that you care about sounding objects too like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011191848 which is right on the via node of the restriction.
Enock4seth (2022-06-16 09:36:22+00:00): Coming back to this, I would use oneway=yes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449237752 instead of turn restriction
SomeoneElse (2022-06-06 15:28:09+00:00): Hello Gerd,
I'm not sure what happened here, but this edit somehow merged some building tags with the city - see https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/8027078 .
I've reverted it.
Best Regards,
Andy
eggie (2022-05-10 20:21:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2022-05-10 23:33:51+00:00): Hello.
You already mapped this business in changeset 120019791. Mapping it twice goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element. Therefore this edit is going to be reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120809833
rightnxtdoor (2022-05-16 08:21:04+00:00): Hello,
I made a mistake in the changeset 120019791.
I can't find where to delete it.
The correct changeset is 120809833, so please don't delete it.
Please provide me instructions to delete the changeset 120019791, or please do it yourself.
In summary:
the changeset 120019791 is wrong (my mistake, I apologize) and should be deleted, while the changeset is correct and should not be deleted.
Thanks for your support.
Regards
danieldegroot2 (2022-05-13 08:56:46+00:00): Hey marek,

Across several changesets, you have introduced numerous redundant and/or unfinished empty ways. This may be considered poor mapping if continued.

Could you fix or remove these empty ways, please? You should also be able to find these in the JOSM validator.

Regards,

Daniel
drivec (2022-05-11 02:15:44+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:15:57+00:00): Correction, no city GIS.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:15:36+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
user_5359 (2022-05-30 18:58:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9731060033. What is the meaning of the tag socket:typek = 2 ?
antonr (2022-05-30 20:20:45+00:00): Hi!

It's supposed to reflect that there are two sockets of type K[1] available... Do you think something needs to be changed?

[1] https://www.worldstandards.eu/electricity/plugs-and-sockets/k/
user_5359 (2022-05-30 20:32:38+00:00): Okay „only“ a new format(see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket)
bxl-forever (2022-05-10 23:01:42+00:00): Hello,

A suggestion here: You might be interested to write more meaningful titles for your changesets in the future, really explaining what is going on.

"Added the name of a building".  Fine: I see you touched 5 buildings in this changeset and none got a name.  The only meaningful change I see here is adding start_date and wikidata entry for a cafe.

In the same changeset, you updated the geometry of some buildings.  No problem with that but you didn’t say it.

You deleted the shop that sells car spare parts (inside the gallery, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5154841338/history): again, no problem with that—if the shop is really gone—but you didn’t say a word about reviewing businesses here and removing some of them.

This is only an example but several of your latest edits have similar issues.  This is making the life of other mappers unnecessarily harder, because your changeset titles cannot be trusted anymore.  We already had to deal with people who were hiding malicious edits under innocuous-sounding titles.  I’m sure you are not like them; no reason to act like them, then.

Have a nice day.
JhowieNitnek (2022-05-10 23:05:11+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the feedback I will try to make better titles in the future
bxl-forever (2022-05-10 23:06:42+00:00): That being said, it looks like some info you added a few months ago is gone and should be restored.

This is the building named "L'Ange - Het Faillen Hoofd" which was here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306856723/history
https://monument.heritage.brussels/nl/Brussel_Vijfhoek/Grasmarkt/8/31374

Which is now this building
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059066923

Perhaps you might want to have a second look.

Hope this helps.
Negreheb (2023-08-17 07:34:32+00:00): Servus, du trägst hier relativ viele Sachen als Meadow ein, hier gibt es aber sicher auch noch irgendwo Getreide, Mais oder Kartoffeln oder so. 

Es wurde schon im Forum angesprochen, vielleicht magst du dich ja dazu äussern https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/pinzgau-wird-grun/102556
user_14247303 (2023-08-18 18:44:24+00:00): Hallo Neglhheb,
Danke für Dein Interesse.
Ich bin im gesamten Pinzgau, sowie am Mozartradweg und Tauernradweg regelmäßig mit meinem E-Bike unterwegs. Einer meiner Brüder lebt in der Stadt Salzburg, eine meiner Schwestern in Hallein. Wie kommst du darauf dass Mais oder Kartoffeläcker wichtiger als Fahrradwege seien. Übrigens die Region birgt viele Schätze, der beste Weg diese zu erkunden ist das Fahrrad, sowie das Wandern auf deren Wanderwegen. Ein besonderer Schatz findet sich für Hundehalter übrigens beim Blausee https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319174692 , besuchen und genießen.
mariotomo (2022-05-11 13:08:19+00:00): (removed descriptive name.) thank you for your correction.
whatmeinfallible (2022-05-12 23:26:21+00:00): Thanks!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-13 14:30:49+00:00): OSM is not for artwork
Wilmer Osario (2022-05-11 00:59:58+00:00): La Caracas-La Guaira no puede llevar la etiqueta [highway=motorway] porque no cumple con las características necesarias de una verdadera autopista.

Lo mismo sucede con muchas de las "autopistas" del país.
Lejun (2022-05-11 06:26:37+00:00): Pas d’erreur flagrante, bien joué !
kapazao (2022-05-11 13:11:37+00:00): Hi, the restriction you added here is not correct. Some vehicles can do the right turn. That restriction was tagged in the ways.
I will remove the no right turn restriction you added.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120811938
MarkusHD (2022-05-11 20:02:58+00:00): We had a little Odyssey driving through Granada yesterday :-)
I had reconstructed my route afterwards with the three differences where I drove or had to drive different than suggested by the Organic Maps router. I was pretty sure it was a simple no right turn sign there, but maybe I didn't remember correctly. Sorry if this was a mistake.
canfe (2022-05-11 04:48:04+00:00): Qual è la fonte dei dati? L'edificio way 1059081733 non compare sulle immagini aeree.
Il type non ha senso e son taggati come building i nodi.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120812658
woodpeck (2022-05-18 20:51:16+00:00): Dear giorgio92, please explain the source of this data or it will have to be removed as an undiscussed import like the others.
FvGordon (2022-05-12 19:31:12+00:00): We don't put building attributes on the nodes, which make the outline of buildings. Can you please remove the building attributes from the building outline nodes.
MapGrid (2022-05-10 22:49:19+00:00): In 1984 the Inuvialuit Final Agreement adopted the intersection of the northerly bank of the Kugalak River and the shoreline of Penny Bay in its definition of the Holman 7(1)(b) parcel at the western end of the Wollaston Peninsula on Victoria Island.
The Nunavut Act of 1993 adopted part of the Holman 7(1)(b) boundary as part of western border of Nunavut.
Thus the Nunavut Act includes the words: "thence easterly in a straight line to the intersection of the northerly bank of Kugalak River and the shoreline of Penny Bay in Amundsen Gulf".

Between 1984 and 2015, erosion caused the mouth of the river to move about 1500m south; this is evident when comparing old and new satellite imagery.
In 2015 the federal government paid for a legal survey of the riverbank.  Searches show this was the first legal survey that includes the intersection of the river and the shoreline.
The resulting survey plan (105816 CLSR NT) includes a small arrow and the words: "INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY BANK OF KUGALUK RIVER AND THE SHORELINE (OHWM) of PENNY BAY".
The survey includes 36 GPS readings along the northern bank of the river, but unfortunately the spot marked by the arrow was determined from Satellite imagery instead of GPS; so no precise coordinates are provided for the intersection.

Based on features shown on the survey plan, it is possible to determine the location of the arrow with an accuracy of about 10m.  If we believe current ERSI imagery, the spot marked by the arrow is now under water due to erosion.

It is not clear if the current boundary should be based on the 2015 survey or if it should move with the river. I expect it would take a team of lawyers to figure that out.
Also keep in mind the river will overflow its banks at certain times of the year causing parts of the coast and the islands in Penny Bay to become submerged.

In this changeset I have redrawn the entire marine boundary from mainland Canada to the Kugalak River.  The eastern termination point is within about 20m of the spot marked by the arrow on the 2015 survey plan.  The nodes are plotted on a geodesic line which gives the marine boundary a slight curve when viewed on a Mercator map.
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-20 02:30:51+00:00): Hi, where is this import documented?
osm-contributor (2022-06-21 16:29:31+00:00): hello there! i've been using the MapWithAI data source (United States addresses) provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and its partners (licensed under Public Domain). i've been importing addresses for buildings and mainly selecting houses in this area using the MapWithAI plugin, making sure not to import addresses for detached garages or conflicting addresses. it also allowed me to find a few incorrect street names on OSM, which i've double-checked using street imagery and corrected. i've also tried cleaning up building geometry by hand.

i'm new with importing. while typing this response, i just realized that there are guidelines on the wiki for importing, which i should have read before doing so. i now realize what you mean by "documented". i apologize.

i have compiled a list of 45 changesets that i've made importing addresses using the method i described above. i did not use a dedicated import account. is it possible for me to retroactively add these imports to the wiki? thank you for pointing this out.
BioHazardEmpire (2022-05-10 22:43:02+00:00): I don't remember how the trail crosses the stream but I can go check out the trail sometime this week to see if it is a bridge
kapazao (2022-05-11 11:49:22+00:00): Hi, the parking can be accessed only by caravans, that is the reason of tagging it as access=no + caravan=yes. Maybe caravan=designated would be better.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120813130
MarkusHD (2022-05-11 20:54:41+00:00): Oh, this was the reason, of course...
Instead of access=no I used motor_vehicle=no and added motorhome+tourist_bus=designated now. Deleted caravan=yes because this key is meant for camping trailers only.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120857823
user_5239402 (2022-05-11 02:57:46+00:00): 저기요 이런 편집은 그만하시죠? 저번에 편집한 사람과 동일인 같은데 자꾸 다중계정으로 이런 의미없는 편집을 합니까? 정상적인 편집을 하세요! 제발요
운영진에게 신고합니다.
user_5239402 (2022-05-11 02:57:54+00:00): an unlikely name and a duplicate building
user_5239402 (2022-05-11 02:58:19+00:00): 이럴 시간에 정상적으로 편집하거나 다른일을 더하세요
user_5239402 (2022-05-11 03:09:51+00:00): This cafe doesn't exist.
DUGA (2023-12-26 21:42:20+00:00): Advice: Need to first educate yourself on what a radio mast is before mapping there.
bisonprarieafternoon (2023-12-29 00:47:14+00:00): That is nice sweety. 

This has stuff mounted to the top like a typical mast or tower that is not a radiator/antenna its self. It has guying which to my knowledge is the main defining difference between it being a tower.
BPTT (2024-12-17 16:01:44+00:00): Can you remind me why we agreed to remove the OLT Lines' names from the pathways themselves? I can't remember if spoke via DM or changeset comment. Anyway, I use RidewithGPS exclusively, and I've found the audio directions to be really consistent - and really really handy when a pathway IS actually named with the route line, so I know (for instance) that I'm turning slight right onto an OLT path and not hard right onto a roadway. I'm very willing to re/name each member way in each of the 11 lines' relations  if we can come to a consensus about this. It seems many other users have recently been re/naming segments with the same names of the Lines/relations.