piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-09-29 17:52:50+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52467047
dit was je changeset.
We proberen ten alle tijden plakken van landuse en wegen te voorkomen.

Graag reactie
eggie (2017-09-29 18:49:16+00:00): De landuse heb ik losgemaakt van de nieuwe wegen. De highway construction die nog onder de Jousterweg lag heb ik verwijderd.
Editor iD plakt heel snel. Er lijkt wel lijm aan te zitten. . dus  voldoende inzoomen. 
Is dit een tijdelijke oplossing?
brandie21474 (2017-10-02 08:50:55+00:00): nee, dit is permanent. De eerste omzetting van het nieuwe knooppunt. er zal de komende weken nog meer definitief worden omgezet
eggie (2017-10-02 09:29:27+00:00): Oke.. succes met verder mappen. schroom niet om iets te vragen. Dat kan ook op het forum. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
eggie (2017-09-29 17:54:29+00:00): Pobeer precies te definieren wat je doet.
Dit was je changeset.
Sanniu (2017-10-02 07:13:20+00:00): You've added some points with names but w/o tagging (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5137067097). Can you add appropriate tags to them? (At least amenity=shop if you don't find exact tag to apply)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-10-01 12:50:24+00:00): alguns pontos foram desconectados nesta edição, exemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1797692506
4004 (2017-09-29 09:50:58+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
насколько я вижу, вы подправили геометрию населенного пункта. если данные свежие и вы в них уверены, то все ок
gileri (2017-10-08 20:48:41+00:00): Bonjour xrt,

Je pense que le tag layer=* devrait être utilisé au lieu de building:levels=*.
Il y a aussi le tag location=underground qui est recommandé pour indiquer ça :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:power%3Dtransformer
GerdP (2017-09-30 05:47:13+00:00): Hi!
Please review unusual highway=footpath on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24178264
It was hw=path before, so I assume you wanted to change it to hw=footway ?
3vivekb_sjsidewalks_import (2017-10-05 02:33:55+00:00): I made the suggested changes in 52641927.  Thanks for the suggestion I knew it looked weird.
Constable (2017-09-29 09:16:42+00:00): Ciao, vedo che per centrare la strada hai usato le immagini satellitari di Bing, non farlo per favore, le immagini di Bing sono male allineate al resto della mappa, quindi alllineando gli oggetti mappati con quelle immagini si rischia solo di far perdere dettaglio alla mappa. Le Mapbox e Esri dovrebbero essere allineate meglio. Per una miglior mappatura bisognerebbe usare quelle del geoportale nazionale ma sono disponibili solo nell'editor JOSM
Ciao
literan (2017-09-30 22:18:48+00:00): Почитайте, пожалуйста, определение тега park. Не каждый газон - парк.
Constable (2017-09-29 09:04:22+00:00): Ciao, guarda però che la ciclabile così come la hai aggiunta non va molto bene, perché sembra non essere connessa alle strade che incrocia. Dovresti far si che la ciclabile abbia un punto in comune con le strade che interseca, perché senò i programmi di navigazione la identificano come una ciclabile che non è accessibile dalle strade con cui non ha punti in comune.
Guarda questa per esempio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297302371
Ne approfitto per indicarti due pagine indispensabili ad ogni mappatore, la prima è una guida introduttiva http://learnosm.org/it/, la seconda una raccolta di tutte le informazioni utili, compresi i tag con cui mappare i più svariati oggetti http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
Se hai dubbi chiedi pure, ciao e benvenuto!
Constable (2017-10-19 17:43:29+00:00): corretto
ToniE (2017-09-29 14:59:20+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast hier einen neuen Track gezeichnet, ohne zu definieren, wie der Übergang über die Paartalbahn aussieht.

- Bahnübergang, ebenerdig

- Unterführung

- Brücke

beide Wege haben keinen gemeinsamen Punkt, d.h. so wie es gemapped ist kanns ein Tunnel oder eine Brücke sein, aber kein Übergang.

Gruß
Toni
alekno (2017-10-02 08:49:23+00:00): Irgendwie scheinen nun die Buslinien Relationen kaputt zu sein.
Ingo Wakop (2017-10-02 10:08:27+00:00): Kannst du das näher spezifizieren? Ich hab das letzte Stück Krakser und die Dunlopstr. aus den Linien 46 und 47 genommen da jetzt am neuen Kreisel gewendet wird. Ich hoffe ich hab da nix kaputt gemacht.
Ingo Wakop (2017-10-02 10:26:53+00:00): Ich  glaube ich hab was gefunden, du meinst die Haltestelle Dunlopstr West und Krakser Bahnhof C bzw A? Kümmer ich mich drum
Ingo Wakop (2017-10-02 13:03:37+00:00): So, ich hoffe das es jetzt OK ist
alekno (2017-10-02 13:21:02+00:00): Ja, das sieht schon besser aus. Nun führen die Linien über den Bahnhofvorplatz. Allerding stört mich noch die Führung der Linien über den ganzen Vollkreisel.
Ich muss jedoch mal Vorort nachschauen, was mit den Dunlopstraße Haltepunkten geschehen ist.
Ingo Wakop (2017-10-02 13:37:03+00:00): Das ist schon korrekt, die 46,47 führen über den Vorplatz / Parkplatz und dann über den Kreisel zurück, man könnte den Kreisel noch aufspalten wenn du das für sinnvoll erachtest. Direkt an der Krakser Str. ist eine neue Haltestelle Bahnhof C entstanden, schon fertig aber noch mit einer Tüte abgedeckt (Stand Fr) und noch nicht in Betrieb, darüber läuft demnächst die Linie 37, wahrscheinlich fällt dann die Haltestelle an der Verler Str weg. Die Haltestellen an der Dunlopstr. sind komplett weggefallen, das waren ja eh nur provisorische Haltestellen damit der Bus über die Dunlopstr. wenden konnte.
Ingo Wakop (2017-10-02 13:42:24+00:00): Achja die Haltestelle Bahnhof B wurde von mir "interpoliert". Im Moment steht dort eine mobile Ersatzhaltestelle, während die Bahnhof A schon fertig ist und auch so heißt. Ich vermute mal B ist nur Ausstieg und A nur Einstieg da der Bus da eine längere Pause macht.
alekno (2017-10-02 15:03:24+00:00): Ja, vielen Dank erstmal für das Einpflegen. Ich habe michnoch nicht daran getraut, obwohl ich schon vorbereitend GPS Tracks gemacht habe. Bei Mobiel habe ich noch nicht geforscht. Weitherhin ist mir noch die Radroute BI7 noch ein Dorn im Auge, da sie über die Krackser Straße und auch den Kreisel geht, wobei ein straßenbegleitender Radweg existiert (keine Ahnung wie ich das kartieren würde). Ungewöhnlich für mich persönlich ist allerdings auch das Rad/Fußweg Tagging ;)

Gruß, Alex
Ingo Wakop (2017-10-02 15:40:28+00:00): Naja, die ganzen Radwege wurden ja zum Teil von GeoInfoBi so überarbeitet das sie eigentlich den Taggingvorschriften widersprechen, ich meine mal gelesen zu haben das da aber irgend ein Sinn hinter stehen soll, muss man mal eroieren.
Meinst du denn das man den Kreisel aufspalten sollte? Wobei ja die 37 den dann vollständig befährt und die 46/47 ein Viertel auslässt? Die neue 37er Haltestelle behalte ich im Auge wenn die in Betrieb geht bekomme ich das zeitnah mit.
Jarek 🚲 (2017-10-07 13:20:08+00:00): Hello,

I went through the Moritzplatz station in person, noted all the directions signed for the exits (e.g. "Oranienstraße, Stallschreiberstraße"), and added them to the railway=subway_entrance nodes (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3844466997/history) in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52389086

In this edit, you changed all eight of them to identical name=U-Bhf Moritzplatz

If nothing else, the most prominent signs above the entrances read "U Moritzplatz", not "U-Bhf Moritzplatz".

Your own https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MENTZ_GmbH/Modellierungsvorschl%C3%A4ge_Indoor#Entrance_of_a_train_station_or_an_open_station_area specifies "Name of the entrance, if available. NOT the name of the railway station"

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=subway%20entrance also notes "Name of the exit if is known. Not the name of the station"

Having 8 identically named entrances (sharing the name with the overall station) seems to me less useful than having 8 entrances with names corresponding to what is written on the walls in the subway station by these entrances. If you disagree, can you explain why? If not, I would like to undo this part of your change.
Jarek 🚲 (2017-10-14 12:57:01+00:00): I did as specified -> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52923335
soemisch (2019-01-16 12:06:46+00:00): Hello, 
when you want to go by subway these are entrances should named U Moritzplatz and when you arrives then you look for the street to get off the station.
So you could use the current names for direction signs mapped as a relation "destination_sign" on platform and mezzanine.
I will not change your dataset.
Kind Regards, Lars
Jarek 🚲 (2019-01-16 13:24:53+00:00): Yes, that would be okay as well, especially if that scheme is actually used by any data consumers. If someone wants to change it to that scheme I will support them.
4004 (2017-09-29 09:56:39+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
я так понимаю, все здание используется холдингом как офис? в таком случае имеет место быть тег office=media/company, который я и добавлю. в остальном все ок
Медиахолдинг "Варяг" (2017-09-29 11:36:44+00:00): Здравствуйте, да, все верно.
4004 (2017-09-29 11:47:06+00:00): отлично, спасибо
kayle (2019-03-14 17:18:01+00:00): Ahoj,
jedna otazka na tieto body:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4955709508
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5137175633

Nie je to trocha zavadzajuce to oznacenie highway=rest_area? Je tam vyasfaltovana plocha, aby sa dalo ked treba spravit prechod medzi jednotlivymi smermi.
Ako nudzove odstavenie to moze byt vhodne, ale zastavovat tam v pripade nenudze asi nebude dobry napad.
Vdaka
Jose Riha (2019-03-31 21:06:30+00:00): Suhlasim, ze to nie je idealne tagovanie. Ale `rest_area` si myslim nezasluzia ani tie odstavne plochy pri dialnici, kedze to je cista nudzovka a urcite nie miesto na odpocinok. Mas nejaky navrh ako to otagovat spravne? Dik, j
b108 (2017-10-05 11:28:00+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо за вклад!
Небольшое замечание: точка входа в здания (подъезда) должна находиться на контуре дома. У вас она получилась где-то "внтури" дома.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-05 07:45:08+00:00): Hello d_berger. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5137182675
you have tagged the new and so far unkown key
`bowling_alley` instead of
`bowling`, right?
Please have a look at
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/bowling#values
#newkey
d_berger (2017-10-05 09:18:25+00:00): Hi. Yes, I searched the wiki, but didn't find exactly, what I was looking for. It states for the common tagging 'leisure=bowling_alley', "Bowling centers usually have at least two lanes with larger centers having over 80 lanes". However this is a restaurant, not a center, and I'm not even sure if they have more than one lane. Ten/fifteen years ago, this kind of "Kegelbahn" integrated into a restaurant was very common in Switzerland (especially outside of the cities), nowadays it's getting harder to find those at all. So "bowling=yes", or "bowling=9pin" (it is 9 pin, not 10 pin) would be acceptable?
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-05 09:50:20+00:00): If it's a kind of "Kegelbahn" then `sport=9pin`. Have a look at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sport#Sport
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-05 09:50:52+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31898
d_berger (2017-10-05 11:07:50+00:00): Thanks, done.
Supaplex (2017-09-29 11:26:12+00:00): 不好意思，你誤動到石牌捷運站，誤加了學校屬性了
Jahnavi (2017-10-02 17:02:06+00:00): Hello! Can someone review these changes please?
eggie (2017-09-29 19:43:20+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode. Twee adressen geeft verwarring.
tonyf1 (2017-10-01 00:42:07+00:00): Hi. You accidentally dragged a node of the coast 4735608552. I restored it with  Changeset #52524642
Aushiker (2017-10-01 01:46:08+00:00): Thanks for the fix. Learning this editing process so any suggestions for a good beginner's guide most welcome. I plan to ride this area in a couple of months so hopefully will have a few tracks and the like to add to the map.
SomeoneElse (2018-07-05 06:52:35+00:00): Assuming the pump is supposed to be a vertical one, then yes the handle is still missing.
(Answering question asked in another changeset)
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 00:15:53+00:00): Hi, are Clare Bank and Dere Street alternative names for the same road? If so, name should be set to one of them and alt_name to the other. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
smb1001 (2017-10-31 14:22:32+00:00): I've had a look at other sources and relabelled the route from Whittonstall to Ebchester. Dere Street is the name of the Roman Road so only applies to the parts that intersect with the road. Chare Bank is the official name in Ebchester, but I can't see if it extends beyond the bridge.
SomeoneElse (2017-11-06 10:24:40+00:00): So should e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4045056 be renamed back to Chare Bank?  It's a few years since I drove up there, but I don't remember seeing any Dere Street signage (though it's memorable as a "long and straight road").
Best Regards,
Andy
smb1001 (2017-11-06 10:42:20+00:00): The Ordnance Survey only lists the name Chare Bank in Ebchester itself - well before it reaches the bridge. It then lists B6309 after that. In addition it gives the name as Fine Lane when it turns north temporarily. On the straight part from there to Whittonstall it calls it Dere Street and B6309. Also, official addresses in Whittonstall only give the address as "The Cottage, Whittonstall", with no street given, so that's no help. 

Anyway, I think the current values are as accurate as we can be, but please to edit if you find better sources.
kreuzschnabel (2018-01-02 18:29:19+00:00): Dann aber bitte nicht einfach nur den Node verschieben – so hast du nämlich einen gewaltigen Zickzack in die Straße gebaut. Ist repariert :)
timmito (2018-01-02 18:37:52+00:00): Das war natürlich nicht beabsichtigt. Danke für die Reparatur. :)
EinKonstanzer (2017-09-29 22:31:41+00:00): Ist das ganze Gebäude Klinik? Also sonst nichts? Wenn nein, was sind da noch für andere Firmen im Gebäude? Bisher war das Gebäude mit (IT) gekennzeichnet.

Am besten ist es immer das "Ding" als Punkt einzuzeichnen (unabhängig vom Gebäude).

Klinik sagt nicht viel... Was genau für eine Klinik: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:healthcare
SomeoneElse (2021-01-02 00:55:14+00:00): Hello,
I think there is a problem with the width on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528698619 .  Should "-1" be "1" perhaps?
Best Regards,
Andy
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-30 19:24:43+00:00): Hi, pedestrian access on way 363788759 has been changed to permissive in this changeset. However, the way also has designation=public_footpath. and these two together are not a valid combination. Can you please checkwhich is incorrect?

Thanks,
Mike
jempi (2017-10-31 06:54:52+00:00): My error indeed. Met the farmer when lost the path. Nice chap!
mavl (2018-12-25 20:20:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-09-29 17:12:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно редактировали данные OpenStreetMap. В этом пакете правок вы добавили названия для домов "Менделеево мкр". В действительности это не название дома, а часть адреса. Для адресов есть специальные теги и они уже указаны. Подробнее в статьях:  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name?uselang=ru  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:Key:addr&uselang=ru  
  
Я собираюсь удалить эти названия в ближайшее время.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:38:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:55:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:36:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
LeifRasmussen (2017-09-29 15:30:53+00:00): I noticed that some bike lanes where missing, so I added them.  I then started improving the alignment of the intersection when I was interrupted. I saved my changes and forgot that I had deleted the turn lanes. Thank you so much for fixing my mistake before anything bad happened! I am so sorry.
DK7080BE (2017-09-30 10:03:28+00:00): Are there still bike lanes/cycleways missing. I have added two turn-lanes on the cycleways.
This is how it looked a month ago: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.64357/12.40052&layers=C
and this is how it is now: https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/?zoom=19&lat=55.643338&lon=12.40112&layer=Grayscale&overlays=TTT
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:31:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:54:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dudka (2017-10-06 20:12:46+00:00): чому видалено додані мною теги?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:45:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
EneaSuper (2017-09-30 12:35:47+00:00): Questo negozio è troppo togo :D
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Jordi MF (2018-08-04 18:55:23+00:00): Hola adruki,

Gracias por tus aportaciones en OpenStreetMap. He visto que has modificado el Centro Comercial El Saler algunas veces. Me sorprende que cambiases la etiqueta shop=mall a building=commercial. Creo que es incorrecto. Si estás de acuerdo conmigo, cambiaré dicha etiqueta a shop=mall y añadiré la etiqueta name=* y la dirección. Saludos.
mavl (2017-09-29 17:18:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. "9-й микрорайон" - это не название здание. Не нужно добавлять части адресов в качестве названий. Пожалуйста, прочитайте статью про названия в OSM.  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
eggie (2017-09-29 19:31:00+00:00): Ik zie hier een paar verplaatste adresnodes. Zal wellicht niet de bedoeling zijn, want daardoor raak je nog meer in de war. Ik kijk even.
eggie (2017-09-29 19:35:35+00:00): De adresnodes heb ik teruggeplaatst.
Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52473955
Sosha1996 (2019-03-24 02:24:47+00:00): تگ این درسته؟
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5061083276
Navid Hosseinzadeh (2019-03-24 09:37:49+00:00): درسته ولی دقیق نوع سرعت گیر مشخص نیست
traffic_calming=yes
Any device or feature causing traffic to calm or slow. Be more specific where possible.
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming
StephaneP (2017-12-06 09:06:07+00:00): Bonjour Fred63, tu as indiqué ce chemin comme interdit d'accès : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250457318
Pourtant il doit bien l'être pour certains puisqu'il existe. agricultural=yes ?
Matija Nalis (2023-04-01 00:14:15+00:00):  Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?
aceman444 (2020-04-28 14:27:12+00:00): Zdravim, vsimol som si, ze ste na roznych cestach v Devinskej Novej Vsi doplnili znacku access=permissive. Zrejme ste chceli vyjadrit nejake obmedzenie vjazdu, avsak tato znacka explicitne znamena, ze prave vsetci pristup povoleny maju. Napr. na tej ceste pred zeleznicnou stanicou je 'zakaz vjazdu vsetkym vozidlam okrem dopravnej obsluhy', co naozaj obmedzuje vacsinu vozidiel, ale je to uplny opak nez co ste zaznacili.

Prosim nastudujte:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bratislava#Dopravn.C3.A9_zna.C4.8Dky
a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:Road_signs_in_Slovakia
a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:access
a ked budete zase v DNV skuste tie cesty prejst a pristupy v OSM poopravovat. Dakujem
koba44 (2020-04-29 13:48:41+00:00): dakujem za info. opravil som.
aceman444 (2020-04-29 15:59:17+00:00): Dakujem, hned je to lepsie. Avsak na tej stanici to urcite 'private' nie je, jedine ze by sa tam zmenila znacka a uz nie je 'okrem dopravnej obsluhy' (to sa znaci inak). A tie cesty 'private' okolo Opletalovej 98 mi tiez pridu divne. Aka je tam presne znacka?
koba44 (2020-04-29 16:18:58+00:00): Opravil som prístup k stanici. Južne od stanice cesta private je, lebo je tam zákaz vstupu okrem ŽSR a je to pozemok ŽSR bez verejného využitia (na rozdiel od  železničnej stanice, kde verejné využitie je)
Čo sa týka domov na Opletalovej, tak je tam zákaz vjazdu automobilov mimo obyvateľov domov (ktorí vlastnia aj parkovacie miesta a i komunikáciu) zákaz sa netýka priľahlých chodníkov (peších, preto som tam dal foot=yes). Mám to zmeniť na vehicle=private?
aceman444 (2020-05-03 09:13:39+00:00): Ano prosim, ak je tam zakaz vjazdu (vsetkych vozidiel), dajte len vehicle=private, nech tam chodci, nemotorove kolobezky ci korculiari maju pristup. Ak je tam "zakaz vjazdu motorovych vozidiel" tak motor_vehicle=private. "Zakaz vjazdu automobilov" neviem co je, len osobne auta, ale napr. nakladne mozu? Aj to by sa dalo ako motorcar=private, ale to ste asi nemysleli.
eggie (2017-09-29 18:12:38+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-29 18:22:46+00:00): Dit is een beetje ongebruikelijke edit. Je hebt een way toegevoegd zonder verder tags met de name 5km. Wat is je bedoeling precies? Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-09-29 18:29:18+00:00): Ik zal je bijdrage verwijderen. Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust. Graag reactie.
Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52474508 

Een bestaande route met een erkende naam wordt als een relatie aan de wegen toegevoegd. Dat is ook geen werk voor startende mappers. Er zijn een aantal vaste ervaren mappers mee bezig.
eggie (2017-09-29 18:31:12+00:00): Reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52474508
user_5359 (2017-09-30 06:26:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.