piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flohoff (2015-05-14 11:17:53+00:00): Das Thema ist eben nicht so klar - Deshalb fand ich den Changeset nicht vernuenftig. So wie es jetzt getagged ist und war ist die Strecke der B55/B64/B61 um Rheda dort Trunk wo sie a) 4 Spuring ist b) durch Mittelleitplanke getrennt und c) überwiegend keine Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung gilt. 

Dort wo all das nicht mehr gegeben ist - d.h. nur noch 2 Spurig. Keine Mittelleitplanke oder Doppelte Linie, nicht mehr Kreuzungsfrei und überholen erlaubt ist, ist und war es Primary.

Damit entspricht das Tagging den Strecken weiter nach Norden richtung Münster und weiter nach Süden richtung Lippstadt. Dort ist der Ausbauzustand identisch und es ist auch Primary.

Um Walibo und Lippstadt drumherum ändert sich ja dann der Ausbauzustand wieder auf 4 Spuring mit doppelter Mittellinie und da ist es finde ich richtigerweise wieder trunk obwohl NICHT Kreuzungsfrei. Der Ausbauzustand ist aber deutlich größer und besser als zwischen Langenberg und Walibo.

Flo
Nakaner (2015-05-17 14:17:39+00:00): Bitte denk noch daran, die Öffnungszeiten-Syntax der Objekte, die du in diesem Changeset editiert hast, zu korrigieren. Sie ist mometan nicht valide.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-31 10:54:26+00:00): I doubt that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344531944 really has a _name_ of "undefined" does it?
gistutor (2015-05-31 11:40:58+00:00): There is no official path to follow across Kinder Scout. Walkers have to make their own way across and whilst it possible and permissable to cross the path is 'undefined'.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-31 11:55:21+00:00): If there isn't a defined path, don't make one up for OSM and certainly don't make up a name for it.  I'm familiar with Kinder and am very used to how the "available routes" change as the rainfall (and previous season's footfall) changes.  The whole area's access land so any route across Kinder is "foot=yes" in OSM terms.
frosm (2019-05-30 01:36:29+00:00): Bonjour,
il y a 2 réceptions pour ce camping ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63247839
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63236549
Yod4z (2019-05-31 13:15:15+00:00): Je viens d'envoyer des photos sur mapillary sur les entrée. Je suis en vacance proche mais je n'y loge pas. La réception semble être au nord. Le bâtiment à l'ouest est vide ( peu être utilisé en haute saison)
Jojo4u (2015-05-13 08:34:43+00:00): Hallo Svenja(OSM),

ich bin durch die Datenspende gestern durch durch gegangen, die wheelchairs habe ich so belassen, da ich nicht wusste welche Quelle zuverlässiger ist.
Frage: https://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/121288643 - das ist doch eher Kirche statt Gemeindehaus, oder?

LG Joachim
Nakaner (2015-12-24 10:31:10+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35999410
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2016-08-25 14:38:35+00:00): Hej, pas på med at sætte generelle access tags.
Når du fx sætter access=yes på en footway, så tillader du biler at køre på den.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344544587
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=56.14709%2C10.20894%3B56.14692%2C10.20815#map=19/56.14700/10.20857
MichaelVL (2016-08-25 14:45:01+00:00): Hej,
Ja, har godt set diskutionen på talk-dk. Var ikke klar over at disse access tags trumfer alle default access permissions...
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2016-08-25 17:58:14+00:00): Nej, det var også først nu da Osmand ledte mig ad en sti, at jeg kom til bunds i det.
gormur (2015-05-12 18:57:56+00:00): Correcting changeset comment: Reusing redundant addr interpolating ways
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-10-25 09:53:22+00:00): What's "San Antone" here? An addr:housename? Shouldn't you add that tag? 😉 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘵 Don't forget neighbour too ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3512925893 )
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-12 21:30:01+00:00): Thanks.  Note that "name" is not needed if it repeats the main tag.  If it has a real name like "name=Jake's Toilet Stop" that's fine.

Is there also an amenity=caravan_site here for overnight parking?
Barrocas (2015-05-12 21:55:55+00:00): I left the name to be able to help in any search, if the user does not know the new correct tag.

That one is like the example in the first top picture on the wiki page.

I don't live there, but I know someone who does, so I'll try to find out if there is a dedicated site for caravan overnight parking.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-12 22:06:03+00:00): Helping with search is no good, since there may be a station closer to the user without a name tag.

Sounds like this one should be fee=yes also.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-26 05:42:39+00:00): I remove the name tag, and the tag "user_defined_other	sanitary_dump_station" from the dump station you mapped.
Barrocas (2015-05-30 14:44:08+00:00): I realize what you want, but forcing it is not helpfull.
Do you realize that now it's not rendered at all? Not in OSM, nor in Osmand.
At least with the name and the way it was, it showed up in search and in the rendered maps.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-30 15:30:59+00:00): There are some 800 others that are "not rendered" in the same way.  It's better to fix the problem for the 800 rather than keep 1 node mapped differently.

"don't tag for the rendering" is often repeated, and for some good reasons.

How about instead pushing for proper rendering support.  See the ticket here: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1507
Barrocas (2015-05-30 15:51:53+00:00): I updated the info. See if it's more convenient.
What's the difference between a drain style or a basin style? (I don't use them, so I don't know).
I took a picture of it, if it helps.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-30 16:18:49+00:00): Euro-Relais Mini is a "brand=" not a the name of the facility.

The right answer is for the rendering to recognize all 800 sanitary dump stations, not a hack on this node.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-30 16:20:24+00:00): If everyone invents a new way to tag for the rendering, it makes it even harder for the rendering engines.
Barrocas (2015-05-30 16:41:03+00:00): I did not invent a new way to tag. It has the tag you specified, if the tag is aprooved to be a default, and will render, then it's no longer an issue.
I placed the name according to what I see written on it. It's what people will see on the spot.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-30 19:06:16+00:00): Euro-Relais Mini is not the name of the station, that's the brand name of the equipment.  There are thousands of "Euro-Relais Mini" stations in Europe.

It's the difference between
brand=Chevron
name=Frank's Chevron Station
gormur (2015-05-12 18:56:46+00:00): Correcting changeset comment: Reusing interpolation ways
MKnight (2015-08-09 12:57:04+00:00): warum hast Du hier die Fahrspuren auf 1 gesetzt? Laut Bing sind da deutlich 2 zu sehen.
Rowil (2015-08-09 17:49:46+00:00): Hallo, früher waren es auch 2 Fahrspuren. Jetzt sind es eine Fahrspur und ein Seitenstreifen bzw. Standstreifen.
MKnight (2015-08-10 11:05:02+00:00): ok, habe meine Änderung Deiner Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht und die turn:lanes mit entsorgt.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-08-07 14:51:46+00:00): FYI: The tag denotation=cluster is deprecated http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=denotation&value=cluster
Supaplex (2017-01-22 15:38:52+00:00): 什麼是Site A?
Supaplex (2017-01-22 15:37:23+00:00): Site C是什麼？
Supaplex (2017-01-22 15:34:44+00:00): 請問Site A是什麼？
Supaplex (2017-01-22 15:27:33+00:00): 這是什麼類型的點呢？公司還是店家？
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-07 19:47:00+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151026176
TrickyFoxy (2024-05-07 19:11:13+00:00): Reverted

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151025310
Marych_ (2015-05-13 05:07:47+00:00): Штраф здесь платил?
abdurohman (2017-05-30 21:28:35+00:00): Так точно!
user_2906923 (2015-05-12 19:48:57+00:00): Clădiri
logankp (2015-05-12 19:47:27+00:00): Connected the two ends of Greenwood St E
maraf24 (2015-05-12 22:47:32+00:00): To już drugi twój wandalizm. Nie wątpię, że celowy.
Od teraz każda zmiana ma być skomentowana.
Maarten Deen (2015-05-13 13:39:19+00:00): Hoi Pietlna,

volgens mij heb je met deze edit een deel van de Hogelandsterweg en een deel van de rotonde Hogelandsterweg/Jachtlaan verwijderd. Wegen 329659229, 144340592 en 6351211.
Ik neem aan dat dit per ongeluk is, maar kun je ze wel even herstellen?
maraf24 (2016-01-15 10:47:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344588040
"Please check tagging:
emerge @preserved-rebuild
Thank you,
OdinOxin" (from http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/498468)
wmyrda (2016-01-15 10:57:36+00:00): heh, musiałem nie zauważyć kopiuj wklei zrobionego w JOSM zamiast w konsoli. zaraz poprawię
Emilieex (2015-05-12 21:15:59+00:00): Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean *****
user_599436 (2015-05-12 22:54:19+00:00): Careful with these semi-automated edits. In this case you have removed a local landmark.

http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2013/08/take_a_tour_of_the_mysterious_house_on_roof_of_old_syracuse_factory.html

In the future please be more cautious of your edits, especially when they have been made by editors that put effort into their local area.
ediyes (2015-06-12 14:50:39+00:00): Hi,
zeromap, thanks for your feedback, I was fixing overlapping buildings.

I will be more careful in the future.

Edith.
DanielaCortez (2015-05-16 15:58:49+00:00): Nice job!! Thanks for fixed it..
n76 (2016-01-24 00:57:53+00:00): It looks like this change duplicated change set 31069549.

There are lots of seemingly duplicate addresses in this area and the satellite imagery is too old for me to see what the new construction looks like.

Are they really two each of a bunch of these new residential areas?
Gunn Jerkens (2016-01-25 17:22:59+00:00): There shouldn't be two of each, they should be unique addresses? It used to be a car lot, but was converted into a community of new homes, here is the community: http://brookfieldsocal.com/neighborhood/el-paseo-the-village-of-foothill-ranch/ 

If you need more info, please feel free to contact me. 
Thanks.
n76 (2016-01-26 21:37:35+00:00): So it would be alright to delete the duplicates?

Would I be correct in assuming the newer change set for each would have a more accurate position than the older change set? (Without current imagery, I can't tell remotely)

Thanks!
Gunn Jerkens (2016-01-26 21:59:38+00:00): If there are duplicates sure delete them. Yes, you might have a more accurate position. Initially when I did this, I had clustered them base on a map I was given by the community. Thanks.
n76 (2016-01-26 22:43:47+00:00): Actually I don't have more accurate locations: I noticed the issue because Osmose flagged the area. The Bing and Mapbox imagery show nothing there so I can't use that. If you have a map from the developer you have much more information than I. Could you take a look and see which of the duplicate addresses seem more accurate and remove the other?
Gunn Jerkens (2016-01-26 22:54:00+00:00): I just checked, I believe I might have created both sets, if I recall I might have created one wasn't sure it had saved, so I created another. This might explain the conflict? Those two changeset looks like they were created by me? Thanks.
n76 (2016-01-26 22:56:00+00:00): Yes, as near as I can tell both sets of changes were yours which is one reason I thought you'd be able to tell which one(s) were correct.
Gunn Jerkens (2016-01-26 23:06:30+00:00): Ahh, this was my mistake, if I recall I had save it, but couldn't find it, so I made it again. Either one should be fine. Thanks.
Hjart (2015-05-21 04:11:40+00:00): Hvad er ideen i at tegne vejbanerne så tæt på hinanden og så angive placement?
mikkolukas (2015-05-26 19:46:06+00:00): Idéen er udviklet over tid. Baggrunden er følgende:

1. Vejene skal være separerede, da der er en fysisk forhindring imellem (så vi forhindrer routing software i at foreslå u-vendinger).
2a. Ved at placere vejene tæt, fremstår vinklerne i overgangen fra splittet til ikke-splittet (og vice versa) så tæt på virkeligheden som muligt.
2b. Hvis man bare laver overgang fra fælles vejmidte (venstre side af kørebanerne) til separeret vognbane (midt af vognbane), vil en simpel, smal traffic_island se ud som om det nærmest er en chikane.
2c. Et godt eksempel (urelateret hertil, kan se jeg er kommet til at bryde nogle routings) har jeg lavet i krydset syd for Limfjordsbroen, hvor der er en meget lille traffic_island. Dens formål er at hindre trafik mellem de to tilstødende veje (Toldbodgade og Gammel Strandvej).
3. Det giver et mere naturligt flow.
4. Det er nemmere at få lanes til at passe sammen ("to fit").

Håber det giver et bedre billede :)
Hjart (2015-05-26 21:15:22+00:00): Jeg er ikke stødt på fremgangsmåden før og måske jeg lige skal have noget tid til at vænne mig til den :-). Vi får se hvordan det fungerer på længere sigt.
Jeg har ikke bil og mit lokalområde er ikke tilnærmelsesvist så tætbefolket som det her, så jeg har desværre ikke de store muligheder for at teste det i praktisk brug
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-01 04:56:19+00:00): hi, Chelsea12, Thank you for your mapping contribution!

I deleted the building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/344612773) because the building doesn't exist in the imagery. (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30237/task/142648580)

Thank you and happy mapping!
dudka (2015-05-15 12:55:28+00:00): може шлагбаумам на залізничному переїзді поставити access=yes?

https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=48.941579%2C24.715934&point=48.94196%2C24.717211&locale=en-US&layer=OpenStreetMap
Kilkenni (2015-05-16 16:53:42+00:00): Сделал. Надо будет запомнить.
Skippern (2015-05-13 01:07:14+00:00): Bruno, bom ver que voce editando, mas favor adicionar um comentario no seus changesets, to monitorando o atividade no ES, e comentários nos changesets me ajuda bastante do que pra olhar. Também se voce quer participar no bate-papo temos o canal #osm-br no irc://oftc.net
Baloo Uriza (2015-05-21 21:02:47+00:00): Instead of highway=residential, name=Pvt Drive, try this instead:

highway=service
access=private
(don't include any name tag).

Also please be aware that abbreviations in names are frowned on as automated systems can't expand abbreviations reliably, but can render abbreviations from full words if desired.
Neeva Shakya (2015-05-13 03:09:42+00:00): This is my first mapping. When zooming in the map, it displays black blocks blocking the view. There were few spots next to buildings, I am not sure what those were so I left it as is (maybe stack of hay or buildings itself).
marcioaguiar (2015-05-15 15:58:10+00:00): Essa alteração acabou desconectando o viaduto da Joseffa de Mello e quebrou o roteamento na região, Allan. Já corrigi.
mikewheaty (2015-05-13 04:47:28+00:00): added buildings
Akhilan (2015-05-13 04:56:43+00:00): https://ml.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B4%87%E0%B4%B3%E0%B4%AE%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%9F%E0%B5%8D_%E0%B4%97%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%B0%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%AE%E0%B4%AA%E0%B4%9E%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%9A%E0%B4%BE%E0%B4%AF%E0%B4%A4%E0%B5%8D%E0%B4%A4%E0%B5%8D
geohacker (2015-05-15 08:17:04+00:00): I see a couple overlapping buildings. Can you run validate in JOSM and fix this please?
Jojo4u (2015-05-13 15:08:09+00:00): Bei 2796 geänderten Objekten würde ich mir mehr Informationen wünschen. Was hast du geändert?

LG Joachim
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-13 16:32:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31107760 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit of entrace tags. Please do not make such mass edits without seeking agreement from the community first. Also, 'Korrekturen' is not a sufficient description of such an edit.
FahRadler (2015-05-14 10:45:08+00:00): Hallo Joachim,

sorry für die dürftige Beschreibung.
Ich änderte den überholten Tag building:entrance in entrance:yes bzw entfernte Building:entrance wenn entrance:* vorhanden war.
FahRadler
marcioaguiar (2015-05-27 14:06:27+00:00): Allan, cuidado ao colocar barrier=gate no meio da rua. Ele impede a passagem de carros no roteamento.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-19 13:35:57+00:00): Hi - is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20644307 definitely both access=destination and highway=unclassified ?  It's a pretty unusual combination - presumably it's signed as something like access only at both ends?
吳哥哥 (2015-05-13 08:28:16+00:00): 你可以別亂改嗎?
不要製造別人的困擾!
吳哥哥 (2015-05-13 08:28:50+00:00): 乖~改掉喔~你的紀錄我都知道了!!!!!
吳哥哥 (2015-05-13 08:31:26+00:00): ZZZZZZZZZZZ~吳哥晚上會去哭你喔
Chrysopras (2015-05-13 09:07:42+00:00): Supplement to changeset comment:
... and fixed some overlapping buildings BTW.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-07-06 20:05:15+00:00): Czy pamiętasz może jakie jest znaczenie relacji https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5132017#map=18/50.07971/20.00431 ?
mueschel (2016-02-22 18:43:00+00:00): Hallo andrekoe,
diesen Gebäuden mit Hausnummer fehlt die Angabe einer Straße. Ich kann leider nicht erkennen, welche das jeweils ist. Kannst du da noch einen Blick drauf werfen?
Gruß, Jan
mavl (2015-05-13 18:56:29+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Очень хорошо, что вы уточняете железнодорожные станции, но давайте обойдёмся без дубликатов станций. Это уже обсуждалось. Если эти дубликаты вам для чего-то нужно, то об этом можно написать на форуме http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=28705
pschonmann (2015-05-17 19:58:24+00:00): Ahoj, kontroluju co jste si zapamatovali na školení :)
Do rybníku není potřeba psát rybník, je to již definováno water=pond, pokud má rybník oficiální název Hliník dej ho do name, Pro místní dej alt_name ... více na http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:name
Gijs Blonk (2015-05-13 15:41:32+00:00): Hey kukuk,,,Look at OSM Inspector
I did 6000 things on Bonaire.
Salina Goto is open sea at the world map !!,
with 2 islands in it !!
It is not the same story as Salina Slagbaai !
I was trying this and that.
Good luck with this hard one, I will look forward with it !

Gijs Blonk
kukuk (2015-05-13 15:51:18+00:00): Hi,
Salina Goto is mapped as natural water by you, not by me. And it is not connected to the sea. Inside of a natural=water multipolygone you cannot use natural=coastline, you have to use "inner" rules in the multipolygone. 
I haven't checked OSM Inspector, and this tool is not the only and always correct source. Other coastline checkers did report it as error, and if you look at the map at osm.org, you will see that it was rendered wrong. 
So, either tag everything as coastline and connect it to the open sea, or nothing. But you cannot mix natural=water with natural=coastline.

Thorsten Kukuk
Durko_freemap (2015-05-13 12:50:44+00:00): Zdravim, k tym stavebninam by som doplnil este http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityourself?uselang=sk, a budove by som doplnil conscriptionnumber+streetnumber vid. http://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov
aceman444 (2015-05-13 13:09:17+00:00): Myslim, ze stavebniny su shop=trade a trade=building_supplies (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade).
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-13 16:32:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31107760 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit of entrace tags. Please do not make such mass edits without seeking agreement from the community first. Also, 'Korrekturen' is not a sufficient description of such an edit.
AkageMuk (2015-05-13 12:29:35+00:00): Hi there is already a multipolygon for place=city for Riga. This one was for borders only.
AkageMuk (2015-05-13 12:40:33+00:00): Reverted in #31102724. Tag place=city is set up for this relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2921953
mg-code (2015-05-13 13:14:49+00:00): What is the point of multiple relations for same place?
E.g. Jelgava also has administrative level 6 and place=city.
Unfortunately some of Latvian sites are in same administrative level as counties. But they are same, we don't have two Rigas or two Jelgavas in Latvia.
mg-code (2015-05-13 13:16:17+00:00): *Latvian cities.
AkageMuk (2015-05-13 13:23:23+00:00): Most probably it is due to LV cities also are entities of administrative division. As I understand one relation has all the border and administrative division tags and have type=border. Other relation have type=multipolygon and have all place (city) related tags.
Current scheme is really bogus, as place nodes also have many place related tags, but of course no border tags.
Current division could be submitted for talk discussion, I only removed place tag from the border type relation (otherwise it would be two similar multipolygons with place).
AkageMuk (2015-05-13 13:34:21+00:00): E.g. for Riga place multipolygon was introduced two years ago, as introduction comment says for address search fix.
"type=border" relation defines only border related stuff, thus a multipolygon relation has to be defined for a place polygon. But yeah, it is clumsy :(
ramyaragupathy (2015-05-14 14:08:05+00:00): Source is not http://ny.curbed.com/tags/court-street-lofts, but local knowledge
Mauripatt (2015-05-13 12:55:54+00:00): cosa hai modificato?
stephan75 (2015-09-03 16:26:55+00:00): Hallo andrekoe,

in diesem und anderen changesetsNeu-Anspach hast du zu ganz vielen Gebäuden die Hausnummern mittels addr:housenumber=xx eingetragen. 

Leider fehlen aber zu ganz vielen Objekten noch die addr:-Daten zu der entsprechenden Straße ...

Könntest du diese Daten für die beiden Orte noch nachtragen? Das wäre super!

Bisher hast du offenbar den Online-Editor iD verwende. Für eine Solche Datenpflege zu den Adressdaten empfehle ich eher den Java-basierten Editor JOSM ... 

dazu kann ich dir dort den Mappaint-Stil "ColouredStreets" empfehlen, damit werden Straßen und die dazugehörenden Objekte mit addr: Daten farblich zusammen dargestellt ... siehe https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AStyles
gileri (2015-05-14 09:56:14+00:00): Io,

En fait la piste cyclable est déjà tagguée sur la route : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201749689
(cycleway=lane) 

Du coup pas besoin de la mettre à côté :)
Weide (2015-05-14 06:16:35+00:00): Bitte nicht einfach die Tags des alten Platform-Nodes löschen ohne die zugehörigen Relationen anzupassen. Es hat auch keinen Sinn, die neue Platform hinten anzuhängen, dann ist sie erstens zusätzliche Haltestelle, da sie nicht direkt auf den zugehörigen stop folgt und außerdem Endhaltestelle, da sie hinten steht.
Göre (2015-05-17 16:30:22+00:00): ihr habt jetzt einen eigenen Beitrag wegen suboptimalen Bearbeitungen ;-) 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31120
eggie (2018-06-21 08:10:00+00:00): Buiten Nederland gestart met mappen.. daardoor geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-01-04 15:11:28+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Ooit begonnen met mappen, maar nu echt...
frosm (2019-12-19 14:20:43+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3514838979
qu'est-ce que c'est ? un bureau d'une entreprise informatique disposant d'un accès wifi ?
ou cela représente la borne wiki et non les bureaux d'une entreprise ?
car le nom semble contredire le tag principal
naoliv (2015-05-22 20:25:57+00:00): Dirvan, tem bastante informação que você está inserindo que não está incompleta (ou muitas vezes representada de forma incorreta).
Não seria interessante você entrar em contato com a comunidade para verificar a melhor forma de representar os dados?
Dirvan Filho (2015-05-25 17:05:03+00:00): Olá naoliv,
Realmente, importei uma serie de trilhas que tenho feito no Desengano. Fiz uma pesquisa antes para me informar sobre como alimentar. Mas na hora de inserir tenho alguma dificuldade.

Onde posso encontrar mais informação?
naoliv (2015-05-25 17:09:25+00:00): "que está incompleta" eu quis dizer ali em cima; só agora vi o erro :-)
Talvez o modo mais rápido é se inscrever na lista de discussão brasileira, em https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br perguntando sobre o que você deseja mapear e como fazer.
Por exemplo, "Como eu mapeio um abrigo com tais características?", "Como mapeio uma cachoeira?", "Como mapeio uma trilha de pedestres?", etc.
Se você expor o que você deseja mapear eu acredito que fica mais fácil de responder como se faz.
Dirvan Filho (2015-05-25 17:17:49+00:00): Muito Obrigado,
As trilhas que estou acrescentando todas eu fiz a pé ou bicicleta e gravei com GPS. Acho que falta agora aprender a cadastrar corretamente.
Vou me informar direitinho.