piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
IlBano (2021-05-30 16:20:02+00:00): Buonasera Danilo.
In questo changeset hai rimosso una parte del Lungomare Giovanni Caboto che però è ancora transitabile, anche se con percorso diverso.
Questa modifica ha interrotto sia la strada primaria SR213 che le relazioni che descrivono i percorsi ciclistici "Ciclovia del sole"/Eurovelo 7.
Se non hai conoscenza diretta dei luoghi, ovvero non riesci a fare un sopralluogo per rilevare il nuovo tragitto della strada, non è assolutamente opportuno fare questo tipo di rimozioni. Ai fini dell'uso di OSM è molto meglio avere una strada percorribile, ma con geometria da rivedere, piuttosto che non averla più.
Puoi ripristinare ?

Grazie

IlBano
ndm (2021-05-28 20:27:32+00:00): A descriptive changeset comment helps all local mappers - what did you change here? Or was it a mistake and it should be reverted?
McPomHH (2021-08-15 09:37:48+00:00): Die Haltestelle "Eckhoffplatz (Lurup Center" scheint fälschlicherweise verschoben und nicht richtig in die Metrobuslinien 2 und 3 eingebunden zu sein.
Bert Araali (2021-06-02 00:05:04+00:00): You deleted a still existing building, Biryani House garage in the garden. It is hardly visible in latest imagery since overgrown by trees and was incorrectly aligned. Corrected it in changeset 105702922. Please stop deleting buildings in case of the slightest doubt and contact mapper of the original to verify. Use lifecycle tags like raze: or disused: instead of deleting.
RicoElectrico (2021-06-25 08:42:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2727044
kubahahaha (2021-06-25 09:19:30+00:00): Dzięki za czujność, poprawiłem. Z tymi nazwami łatwo było się gdzieś zapętlić.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418392649
ivanbranco (2024-05-17 21:19:58+00:00): Ciao Gior7, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948234492/

ci sono novità? Dopo 3 anni non si vede ancora nulla nelle immagini satellitari
Gior7 (2024-05-18 09:52:44+00:00): Ciao,
considera che i lotti Hirpinia-Orsara e Orsara-Bovino sono gli ultimi ad essere stai assegnati e i lavori sono cominciati da circa un anno, ci vorrà ancora parecchio per cominciare a vedere qualcosa.
MapMakerGal (2021-05-28 18:48:58+00:00): Buenas tardes, ya fuiste avisado muchas veces de que etiquetas mal la clasificación de las carreteras. Por favor, si no tienen clasificación son UNCLASSIFIED y si tienen clasificación depende de lo que pone aquí en la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gl:WikiProject_Revisi%C3%B3n_etiquetado_estradas_auton%C3%B3micas 
Por favor, etiquetemos bien, no queremos llegar a un peor punto.
Jakka (2021-05-28 18:36:04+00:00): "owner " dacht "operator"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105505563
H4N5-antw (2021-05-28 19:49:56+00:00): Ja, dat is bij nader bekijken beter.
archpdx (2021-05-28 18:19:12+00:00): Hi biasedhedgehog,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate the contributions you've made to the map so far. I noticed you added lots as houses. In OSM, houses are meant to outline the actual house building. OSM doesn't recommend adding lot areas, but if you really want to you can change these to plots. See this wiki page for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot

It is more common though to see address points for scenarios like these when buildings themselves don't yet appear in the imagery. If you need any help with this feel free to respond to my comment. Again, thank you for your contributions and happy mapping!

-archpdx
archpdx (2021-05-28 18:27:43+00:00): Hi again,
I have converted the lots you've created into plots and address points like I explained above in changeset 105507693: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105507693
danieldegroot2 (2021-12-03 20:19:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8777260419/history
Dit is een scherpe hoek. Weet je zeker dat dit klopt? Je kan 'm anders beter langs het andere landgebruik laten lopen.

Groet,

Daniel
Peter Elderson (2021-12-03 20:33:25+00:00): Ok heb ik gedaan. Ik kan me deze bewerking niet herinneren,  maar er wordt daar gebouwd dus voorlopig maar even zo laten?
danieldegroot2 (2021-12-03 20:46:29+00:00): Lijkt me prima.
GinaroZ (2021-07-03 23:45:30+00:00): Please be aware of the note tag that you missed, it's not a one way road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145981769
aepunavy (2021-07-06 13:58:21+00:00): Hello GinaroZ, 
Apologies for the genuine miss from my end. I have missed checking the note and added the directions. Thanks for correcting my edit. 
Regards, 
aepunavy
OttoR (2021-10-24 08:21:42+00:00): Hi jmilot,
bicycle=designated is implicit for a cycleway and should not be used.
jmilot (2021-10-25 13:23:43+00:00): Hi,

This seems to be the default value automatically populated when selection the "Cycle & Foot path" feature types. This is probably were it came from in this case. 

Is the default OSM editor faulty here?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-05-28 18:03:25+00:00): Why you deleted it?
user_10714872 (2021-05-28 18:27:34+00:00): Why？
limes11 (2021-05-28 20:34:02+00:00): This was nonsense in the first place. A hamlet in the middle of nowhere on an (almost) uninhabited island - maybe he was toying around?
SekeRob (2021-05-30 08:58:56+00:00): Disappointed it was not retagged as an 'isolated dwelling' ;P
alexey_zakharenkov (2021-05-28 22:29:00+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Тег lanes обозначает количество полос в обоих направлениях, и при чётном значении считается, что туда/обратно одинаковое количество полос. К сожалению, при нечётном числе только лишь тег lanes не даёт полной информации. В этом случае желательно добавлять теги lanes:forward и lanes:backward.
Keima (2021-05-28 19:43:45+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Bonne continuation,
user_2066394 (2021-05-28 20:04:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350153294
Da hat's was verzogen?
Fabiooqko (2021-05-28 20:10:57+00:00): Da muss ich Dir leider Recht geben :-( Aber ich weiß nicht, was genau ich da gemacht hab...Kann ich meine Änderungen insgesamt rückgängig machen?
Fabiooqko (2021-05-28 20:15:22+00:00): Ah, ich habs glaub ich nachvollziehen können. Hab den letzten Punkt des Weges wohl verschoben, anstatt den Kartenausschnitt zu verschieben. Habs korrigiert. Danke für die Info! :-)
user_2066394 (2021-05-28 20:48:49+00:00): einwandfrei :-)
DaveF (2021-07-04 16:02:55+00:00): Hi
Why have you removed two of the networks serving Romford?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romford_railway_station
!bm (2021-05-30 21:39:51+00:00): Hallo schoka,

wikipedia/wikidata des BUND Deutschland passen nicht so recht auf die Geschäftsstelle des Landesverband Berlin. Daher habe ich mir erlaubt, sie wieder zu entfernen.

--besteGrüße!bm
schoka (2021-05-30 22:07:15+00:00): Hi !bm,
die BUND Geschäftsstellen gehören zur Marke BUND Deutschland und deshalb IMHO zu diesem Wiki-Eintrag. 
Was passt deiner Meinung nach nicht?
!bm (2021-05-31 13:37:04+00:00): Hallo schoka,

Wp-Artikel bzw Wd-Objekte sollen sich nur auf das jeweils getaggte Objekt beziehen.[1][2] 

"only provide links to articles which are 'about the feature'."

Das ist, wie ich ebenfalls schon schrieb, hier nicht der Fall. Man taggt ja auch nicht jede Bushaltestelle mit dem Wp-Artikel des Betreibers oder eine Filiale mit dem Wd-Objekt einer Marke. Beachte dazu sekundäre Wp/Wd-Schlüssel. [3] Die Antwort zu deiner Frage hast du dir ja eigentlich schon selbst gegeben. 

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_Wikipedia_links

--besteGrüße!bm
schoka (2021-05-31 20:24:41+00:00): Danke für die ausführliche Erklärung. Auf der englischen Wikipedia-Seite ist es gut erklärt. Werde ich zukünftig beachten (und sattdessen brand:wikipedia benutzen)
!bm (2021-06-01 16:49:13+00:00): Vielen Dank für dein Feedback, freut mich, wenn meines hilft. Ich möchte noch anregen, bevorzugt *:wikidata zu taggen, da es aufgrund maschinlesbarer Daten für Datenkonsumenten nützlicher, vor allem universaler ist – da kann sich dann jeder herausziehen, was er braucht, zB Logo oder auch den Wikipedia-Artikel.

Happy mapping!

--bg!bm
Recoil16 (2021-05-29 13:40:43+00:00): Danke!
Keima (2021-05-28 19:37:36+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Dans votre ajout vous avez superposé de nombreux bâtiment (et ajouté en doublon le restaurant) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421992361 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948251529 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948251528

Bonne continuation,
joost schouppe (2023-10-14 10:45:59+00:00): Qu'est-ce qui vous a poussé à décider que/152056808 est highway=unclassified plutôt que highway=track? Fonctionnellement, c'est une "piste importante", je suppose, mais elle n'est certainement pas adaptée au trafic de transit régulier.
Jean-Seb08 (2023-10-14 12:07:08+00:00): Bonjour, f
Jean-Seb08 (2023-10-14 12:07:39+00:00): Bonjour, Faites les modifications que vous souhaitez, celà date d'il y a déjà 2 ans
joost schouppe (2023-10-15 07:58:05+00:00): OK, merci
Jose Luis Infante (2021-05-29 17:03:00+00:00): Hola,
si és un nom popular aleshores és millor l'etiqueta loc_name. No pot ser (en aquest cas, una platja en Catalunya) que el name i el name:ca siguin diferents.
Salutacions!
woodpeck (2021-06-02 11:28:02+00:00): Dear Alizair19, you're editing schools all over the US and applying a hash tag of "#schools". Can you explain what or who is driving this activity? How do you choose the schools you are working on?
user_2066394 (2021-07-06 11:48:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577840143

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=128839996
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-29 07:06:31+00:00): Atsargiai su keliais. Atstačiau neteisingai į abi puses pratęstą užtvanką Verslo gatvėje  (waterway=dam) ir atstačiau neteisingai perklasifikuotą pravažiuojamą kelią highway=unclassified Šilingo gatvėje.
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-29 07:10:44+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas, čia pravažiuojantis kelias highway=unclassified.
eggie (2021-05-28 20:43:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-28 20:49:44+00:00): Beste TIGG  In principe niet naar de dakranden kijken. Dat is niet de plek waar een gebouw staat. 
Alles in ingemeten import vanuit het Kadaster. 
Luchtfoto's zijn vaak schuin genomen opnames.
Wanneer er echt iets anders staat dan kun je het uiteraard aanpassen. 
Geen idee of het Kadaster (BAG)  het hier nog bijhoudt. 
MVG
eggie
TiGG (2021-05-29 09:38:35+00:00): Beste Eggie, Dankjewel voor je berichtje en dat je meekijkt en je e-mail!  Ik zie dat mijn wijziging van de dakranden weer teruggedraait is. Dank daarvoor ik houd er rekening mee in het vervolg.
Het huis dat ik weg heb gehaald zou bekend moeten zijn bij het BAG maar was helaas niet geupdate dus die is nu wel correct verwijderd. 

Nogmaals enorm bedankt voor de info en het meekijken! Fijn!

MVG TiGG
TiGG (2021-05-29 09:48:28+00:00): Beste Eggie, ik hebb de naam van de weg aangepast naar 'Zwaluwpark', dit gata hoogstwaarschijnlijk zo in de toekomst worden maar is op dit moment nog 'Westbroekse binnenweg' Misschien ben ik te vrpoeg geweest. Kan ik dat recht zetten? Nogmaals bedankt voor de gestuurde info, ik doe volgende keer eerst even overleg. ;-) Groetjes, TiGG
eggie (2021-05-29 09:53:59+00:00): Dag TiGG,
Niet elk Kadaster houdt meer resorts bij.
Dus wijzigingen komen dan niet meer in de BAG. Hier.. geeen idee?
Je zou het natuurlijk kunnen vragen, want dan komt het bij periodieke updates goed in OSM

Hier kun je een terugmelding doen.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=westbroekse%20binnenweg%2052&resultOffset=0&objectId=0333100000018958&geometry.x=134953.48999743&geometry.y=461503.31899721&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0333010000017319

Wanneer het goed staat in de BAG kun je een update verzoek doen via het forum van OSM
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

De molens buj het Kadaster draaien traag...dus voorlopig aanpassen is prima.

*( Wanneer het fout blijft staan in de BAG komt het gewoon weer terug in OSM.. dus een terugmelding is wel belangrijk. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-29 09:56:45+00:00): Die naamswijziging kun je het beste terugzetten, want hulpdiensten (VRT's)  maken gebruik van OSM.
Je zou wel een note= .......  toe kunnen voegen. 
Zodra het officieel wordt veranderd zet je het door. 
gr eggie
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-29 07:11:55+00:00): Kadangi kelio galas sujungtas taku, tai noexit žymos nereikia.
VictorIE (2024-05-11 07:39:29+00:00): Salut,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151048760

operator=400 ?
G_P_J (2021-05-30 10:11:32+00:00): Cześć, bardzo proszę o zwrócenie uwagi na jakość wprowadzanych zmian. W tym przypadku dodałeś adres bez ulicy i dodatkowo zduplikowałeś istniejący prawidłowy punkt adresowy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4740110588 Pozdrawiam, Piotr
lightbuster (2021-05-29 12:10:57+00:00): Hallo Frank, danke. Sieht schon recht gut aus. Bitte prüfe/korrigiere key direction (übrigens alternativ/besser (?) light:direction - nur letzteres ist auf der Englischen Wiki-Seite. Auf der deutschen Seite sind beide erwähnt). Ein Wert von 400 ist m.E. unzulässig: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction Und du könntest noch die Lichtfarbe (light:colour=orange) oder Farbtemperatur (?), Neigung (light:tilt, hier -75 (?)) und evtl. Beleuchtungsdauer (light:lit z.B. dusk-dawn) und Beleuchtungsstärke (light:lux) hinzufügen. Gruß, René
RicoElectrico (2021-06-25 09:01:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2727042
woodpeck (2021-06-02 08:03:46+00:00): Hello DannyMcD, in this changeset you have modified https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8569961926 to have an "addr:street" tag of "Michael Streetoqua Street". Actually you had contributed this name two months ago, and it had meanwhile been repaired to match the actual name of the nearby street, "Michael Stoqua Street". You have reset this to "Michael Streetoqua Street". Have actually looked at this, or was this a blind revert without care? Because if the street is really called "Michael Streetoqua Street" it would make sense to rename the nearby street also. What is going on here?
DannyMcD (2021-06-02 15:53:52+00:00): The issue has been fixed, thanks for bringing it to my attention.
ARitz Cracker (2021-06-02 16:42:26+00:00): Hey there, is there any particular reason why you removed all those addr:housenumber's? They seemed sound to me
DannyMcD (2021-06-02 17:49:46+00:00): @ARitz Cracker, the issue has been fixed
woodpeck (2021-06-01 15:53:26+00:00): Hey there DannyMcD, the use of the reverted plugin to revert whole changesets is a relatively drastic action that requires a good reason. You have not given any in this changeset comment. Why did you revert these edits?
woodpeck (2021-06-01 15:53:56+00:00): "reverter plugin" I meant to say.
DannyMcD (2021-06-01 18:56:44+00:00): Hi woodpeck,
I'm not sure I understand your concern; do you disagree with my revert?  Why?  What do you want?
woodpeck (2021-06-02 07:58:40+00:00): Sorry for not making it clear enough. I want that you explain why you reverted this. Only then will I even be able to form an opinion on whether I disagree or not. And I want that you do not ever again revert anything without giving a proper reason, something you owe to your fellow mappers who are looking at edits in the area and trying to understand what is happening.
DannyMcD (2021-06-02 15:51:04+00:00): Hi woodpeck,
I'm here to map things, not write justifications.  That is my style, and I'm not going to apologize for it or change it.  If you have a specific complaint, I can try to address it.

As for the reverter plugin, what authority do you have to stop me from using it?
woodpeck (2021-06-03 10:15:33+00:00): Danny, I am a member of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group and one of our mandates is to step in when there are disputes or edit wars between users. Reverting someone else's edits without any explanation whatsoever is an extremely hostile action. When challenged by *anyone*, DWG or not, someone who has executed such a revert should be straightforward with and explanation. You say that "you are here to map things, not write justifications". Even if you are not reverting, explaining your actions is something the community has a right to expect from you (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments). Even more so if you revert the contributions from someone else - which is precisely not "mapping things" but "unmapping things". And thrice so if your thoughtless reverts actually introduce errors like I pointed out in that other changeset. If you could now please find the courtesy to explain the reason for this revert? As for future mapping activity, if you insist on reverting changes without explaining why because it is "your style", then it will be "my style" to prevent further contributions from you until you change your style.
woodpeck (2021-06-03 10:29:55+00:00): To be extra clear, the problem is not reverting something, the problem is reverting something without any explanation, and aggravated by the refusal to give an explanation even when asked for one.
DannyMcD (2021-06-03 10:56:10+00:00): I'm willing to let you revert this changeset and stop using the reverter plugin.  Would that satisfy you?  I don't want to get into a long argument about it.  If you do revert this changeset, you should know that I have re-added all these addresses in the same locations (shortly after the revert).

"Style" wasn't the right word, I meant something closer to "personality".

Woodpeck, I would prefer if you avoid if possible contacting me again.  It is stressful dealing with your personal attacks (attacking my style and edits) and threats (e.g. preventing further contributions).  If you must contact me, try to quickly get to what you want and what you threaten to do if you don't get it.
DannyMcD (2021-06-03 10:59:33+00:00): As for justifying this changeset: It was a mistake I almost immediately corrected (before you contacted me) by re-adding the addresses.
ARitz Cracker (2021-06-03 17:59:46+00:00): DannyMcD, I don't understand what you're getting worked up about. Woodpeck is looking out for the integrity of the dataset, and that's a completely valid concern. Finding out that a relatively large chunk of data has been removed for seemingly no reason _is_ a valid concern. At first glance, it appeared that you specifically targeted Matthew Darwin's edits with no care as to what they actually were, and a change-set description longer than a single word would have probably prevented any misunderstanding.

I may utilize the data more than I contribute, but I still care about the accuracy and integrity of the data all the same.

Furthermore, I'm not sure what "almost immediate" means to you, as I came to you about some addresses you deleted yesterday _after_ woodpeck contacted you.

I'm sure no one wants you to feel personally attacked, instead, I'm sure people just want you to understand that if you are going to revert changesets, take a moment to care for what you're actually reverting, and let others know there actually was thought put into it. Otherwise, without knowing the full context, we're just going to assume things, and that may result in assuming the worst.
DannyMcD (2021-06-03 20:47:47+00:00): @ARitz Cracker,
As I think I've made clear, I don't want to discuss this.  I've solved your problem, please leave me alone.  Your lack of understanding has been noted.
woodpeck (2021-06-04 08:11:11+00:00): DannyMcD, I'm afraid this is not going to cut it. OSM is a collaborative project. You can't go round telling everyone you have a disagreement with that you'd rather not talk to them again becasue it is too stressful to you. To be perfectly clear, you were the aggressive party in this. You reverted something without specifying a reason, and not for the first time. When asked about the revert, you refused to say why you did it and became all defensive. To this day you have not said why you did it - only that it was a mistake. You say you re-added the items later which I accept (and was not clear about, so thank you for putting that right) but still, now you are listed as the "original contributor" of these objects whereas you have denied that to the actual original contributor whose work you have deleted. And now you're speaking of the "stress" this situation causes for you and making it sound like you're the victim. You are not the victim; you have done something offensive, been caught out, and now you are unhappy about how stressful it is when you're caught doing something you shouldn't have been doing in the first place.

OSM is a community project, we need to talk to each other. Everyone is expected to provide good changeset comments when they upload a change, please do that in the future. You can of course revert vandalism or the bumbling edits of a newbie that went wrong, but if you do, write a changeset comment that explains why you did that, or if the other person is an experienced mapper, give them a chance to repair the damage themselves. You cannot ever opt out of discussing your edits with others (as long as they are reasonable and not doing this to troll you), so any form of "please do not contact me again" - to me or others - is inappropriate. Any other mapper has the right to contact you about any of your edits and receive a response - a process that happens hundreds if not thousands of times every day.

If you find that interacting with other mappers is stressful, you can do your part to reduce questions about your mapping, by providing good changeset comments (see link I already provided), and by refraining from summarily reverting whole changesets.

I totally understand that this can be stressful at times - but talking to each other is a requirement in a collaborative project. I am pretty sure the parties whose edits you have wiped out without even a comment did not exactly feel joy about that either.

I will let this matter rest here but please consider, in your future edits, that even if you are sitting in front of a computer screen, you are dealing with human beings here, and treat them accordingly. If interacting with other human beings is too stressful for you then OSM is, too.
user_8101879 (2022-05-04 14:04:08+00:00): Hi,

the relation 12770087 has no border (no way with the role outer)

Best regards
Mashin (2021-05-28 21:55:39+00:00): Hi,
Sorry but this is not how we map roads. They are just single line along the centre of the area. Look around in the surrounding area where it will be more clear.
Best,
Mashin
ovruni (2021-05-28 21:18:43+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado nombres en mayúsculas [0], lo cual es desaconsejado, por favor revise la sección sobre nombre donde brindan mayor detalle sobre esto.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may.C3.BAsculas
ovruni (2021-05-28 21:22:40+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado una abreviatura [0], lo cual es desaconsejado, por favor revise la sección sobre nombre donde brindan mayor detalle sobre esto.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos 
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_.28no_hacer_esto.29