piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Minh Nguyen (2022-01-28 02:43:19+00:00): (Typo: I meant it makes a lot of sense to give this segment of Highway **152** the same level of prominence as the segment east of Highway 156.)
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
user_5359 (2022-01-28 10:16:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6074004/history. Why did you change the value of admin_level from 7 to c ?
eggie (2022-01-27 07:12:19+00:00): Dag paver. Je vraagt feedback..
Opnebaar groen is een lastige.
barrier=hedge area=yes vult niet op.
De nieuwe tag is 
natural=shrubbery https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshrubbery

Renderen doet het nog niet, maar die aanvraag loopt.
 natural=scrub rendert wel, maar is meer bedoeld voor wat wildgroei. 

MVG
eggie
skquinn (2022-01-26 22:35:20+00:00): Also resolves note 3020590
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
SherbetS (2022-04-22 15:31:53+00:00): hello skquinn,

on this object
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9451374261

you used the tag man_made=communications_tower when in reality it is actually man_made=mast + tower:type=communication

I understand this is likely due to the confusing nature of the JOSM preset, but please use the correct tagging in the future.

thanks,
SherbetS
skquinn (2022-07-25 21:11:43+00:00): Thanks, this may have been due to what JOSM had for the preset at the time.
SherbetS (2022-07-25 21:42:22+00:00): I'm not a fan of the JOSM presets, they're especially confusing for communication infrastructure. It should be safe to assume any communication structure in the US can be tagged as mast.
tkk (2022-01-29 15:00:12+00:00): Zdravim, v ramci teto sady zmen byl mimo jine odstranen cyklo rozcestnik v Hynkove. Proc byl zrusen, resp. z jakeho zdroje je informace o jehu zruseni?

Dekuji tom.k
Sandonorico (2022-01-30 13:13:11+00:00): Dobry den, jel jsem tam pred par dny a nevidel jsem ho tam. Jestli jsem ho prehledl, mohl byste ho tam pls tuknout zpet? Diky moc, s pozdravem Petr Lachovsky
tkk (2022-01-30 19:57:38+00:00): OK, jak pojedu kolem, tak tam zkusim juknout, zatim nechavam zruseny. Bye tom.k
BCNorwich (2022-01-27 08:02:29+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The way that you changed the tag to footway is a service road, you can see vehicles on it in the imagery. I've changed it back to a service road and added foot=yes.

Regards Bernard.
NM$L (2022-01-27 18:16:12+00:00): Hi, the changset 116323434 wrongly changed the coastline and I'd like to restore it. If I do so, it may make mistakes on futures in this changest. Please note it, thanks.
WingardiumMapiosa (2022-01-27 21:53:48+00:00): Hi NM$L, thanks for reaching out! In this changeset I saw that there was a multipolygon relation which was self-intersecting and realigned the area of concern using Maxar Premium Imagery — https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13045616 this beach relation was broken from recent edits. If you’d like to realign the coastline, please be sure to take care of any relations that may be in the area. Happy mapping!
NM$L (2022-01-28 05:10:14+00:00): Thanks for your reply. I will mind it!
jpennycook (2022-02-05 08:13:08+00:00): Hi!

In this changeset, the tags for "bicycle", "horse", and "foot" were removed when the highway tag was changed from "track" to "path".  If you look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath these tags (bicycle and foot on all of it, plus horse on the public bridleway section) are still required.  I've added them back.

Jon
jpennycook (2022-02-05 08:24:46+00:00): Incidentally, on highway=footway, you don't need to add bicycle=no/horse=no as these are implied (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom).  all of "permissive", "designated" and "yes" mean "allowed" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values)

Jon
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
compdude (2022-01-28 02:31:49+00:00): When you downgrade a road from trunk, please add the expressway=yes tag if it is a divided highway like this one. Thanks!!
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
o_andras (2022-01-26 23:39:14+00:00): The administrative border was modified because some of the buildings shared some nodes with it. Took great care not to move any of the ways of the border. If I did screw anything it was not intentional.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-27 09:09:25+00:00): Access=yes è lo stato predefinito per qualsiasi parcheggio. Non ha senso menzionarlo qui. Solo per l'accesso limitato (come access=customers, access=private) dovreste menzionare questa condizione specifica. 
Leggete il wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access
user_14043589 (2022-01-27 18:37:31+00:00): io uso ID (editor nel brower),
nella prima parte con domande in italiano (oltre al tipo di superficie,tariffa ,posti,ecc),
mi chiede se è pubblico o privato.
poi sotto in automatico mette il tag in inglese con 
access yes.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-27 20:20:43+00:00): C'è anche un menu disponibile dove tutti i tag sono elencati con il loro valore. C'è anche un pulsante di cancellazione.
Allison P (2022-02-01 23:26:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9416800541 seems to be placed on a private residence, was this a mistake?
eggie (2022-02-06 15:45:59+00:00): Dag Teek.. Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot.
Het is nauwelijks te controleren. 
gr eggie
Shaun das Schaf (2022-01-27 13:12:54+00:00): Hallo Thomas,

dieser Weg ist als Grundstückszufahrt eingetragen. Woher kommt der offizielle Name "Schanzengasse" und die Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung für diese Grundstückszufahrt? Ist das so ausgeschildert? Für mich sieht das vom Luftbild her eher wie ein normaler Innenhof aus.

Was mich jedoch mehr stört ist, dass du diesen Weg als Einbahnstraße (oneway=yes) getaggt hast. Das macht in der jetzigen Form keinen Sinn, da man so zwar auf das Grundstück fahren darf, jedoch dieses nicht mehr verlassen kann. War das Absicht?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
TourenbikerFKB (2022-01-27 19:48:37+00:00): Die history des Weges spricht Bände. Die Ecke ist anscheinend in der Fantasy-Welt sehr beliebt und hat schon einiges an Vandalismus und Löschungen erlebt.
TourenbikerFKB (2022-01-27 20:05:10+00:00): Stichwort: Drachenlord. Google kennt sich mit dessen Geschichte aus.
Shaun das Schaf (2022-01-28 07:50:12+00:00): Tatsache, mir war gar nicht aufgefallen, dass wir uns in Altschauerberg befinden. Den Drachenlord kenne ich (leider)...

In dem Fall aber wirklich Vandalismus und gehört revertiert. Werde das heute Abend erledigen.
milet (2022-01-28 09:08:38+00:00): Ich hatte den Namen erst zwei Tage zuvor entfernt.
Die Benutzer sollten für ihren ständigen Vandalismus eigentlich gesperrt werden...
Thomas Lindner (2022-01-28 13:16:03+00:00): Die Einbahnstraße war ein Versehen, aber die Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen sind ausgeschildert
user_10901495 (2022-02-01 18:08:47+00:00): This changeset needs a serious review, just a few minutes after publishing it I had gone* on revert.osmz.ru website to revert it, because I noted that I inavertedly drifted many lines, so I thought it was a closed issue, but now I see that that revert changeset was never published.
Has anybody already noted and resolved the problem?

*not sure of the grammar of this
user_10901495 (2022-02-01 18:09:07+00:00): Has anybody already noticed*
user_10901495 (2022-02-01 18:10:25+00:00): Nothing, I've seen the changeset from Garmin-User resolving it.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-06 23:23:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117097348, 117094894 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for creating fake edits and vandalising OSM.
AgusQui (2022-01-31 03:40:39+00:00): Quedaron mal mapeadas las lineas 24, 28 hacia La Noria, 126.
lyctkel (2022-06-27 07:52:34+00:00): Cześć syntex,
Obecnie badam niektóre rzadko używane znaczniki building=*.
W trakcie tego procesu znalazłem stronę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235327658, która używa building=tennis_court.
Ten znacznik jest używany rzadko.
Z mojego punktu widzenia lepiej pasowałyby poniższe znaczniki:
 sport=tenis
 leisure=sports_hall
 building=sports_hall
Szczegółowe informacje można znaleźć na stronie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_hall.
Jeśli masz pytania, skontaktuj się ze mną.
Z poważaniem,
lyctkel

Przetłumaczono z www.DeepL.com/Translator (wersja darmowa)
----
Hi syntex,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235327658 which uses building=tennis_court.
This tag is used rarely.
From my point of view the foillowing tags would  would fit better:
 sport=tennis
 leisure=sports_hall
 building=sports_hall
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_hall for details.
If you have questions, please feel free to contact me.
Regards,
lyctkel
syntex (2022-07-05 18:02:30+00:00): ok
David Rubquín (2023-03-22 21:02:21+00:00): ¿Podríes dicir por qué pusisti como Peña L.lagos a un picu de Caces (Uviéu)? Cerca de El Pando (Caces)

Ni en Uviéu nin en Santo Adriano ta ningún topónimu oficial con che vaqueira, nun fálase asina en eses zones.
Mashin (2022-01-27 14:51:39+00:00): Hi Erik, nice job!

Though just mind that you accidentally turned Elm Street into a driveway. :) I already fixed that.
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 03:04:00+00:00): 使用的Overpass语句

/*
This has been generated by the overpass-turbo wizard.
The original search was:
“natural=heath in 青州”
*/
[out:json][timeout:25];
// fetch area “青州” to search in
{{geocodeArea:青州}}->.searchArea;
// gather results
(
  // query part for: “natural=heath”
  node["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea);
  way["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea);
  relation["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea);
);
// print results
out body;
>;
out skel qt;
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 03:36:07+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:青岛}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;/*fixed by auto repair*/>;out meta qt;/*fixed by auto repair*/
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 03:54:51+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:泰安}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 03:55:50+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:东营}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 04:26:54+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:寿光}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
Warin61 (2022-01-27 21:48:37+00:00): Hi,
There is an error on one of the buildings - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.82771&lat=-33.76454&zoom=18
kurisubrooks (2022-01-27 23:35:22+00:00): Thanks, fixed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116686056
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 04:33:56+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:济南}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-27 17:15:37+00:00): Hi viknak, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

Full changeset information: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=116647248

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Frans S (2022-02-28 14:15:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark about tagging of buildings.
 For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 04:37:47+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:昌邑}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 04:41:11+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:25];
{{geocodeArea:北京}}->.searchArea;
(
  node["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea);
  way["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea);
  relation["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea);
);
out meta;
>;
out meta qt;
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 04:42:22+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:潍坊}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
Svalbard (2022-01-27 19:44:57+00:00): Hallo pumpa515, anhand welcher Kriterien hast Du vor Ort oder anderweitig überprüft, ob der Name in Großbuchstaben nicht ggf. korrekt ist?

Beispiel: NETTCHEN in Glückstadt.

Gruß Svalbard
puma515 (2022-01-27 20:28:11+00:00): Hallo Svalbard, 
Ich kenn ein Teil der Firmen durch Besuche in Itzehoe. Den Rest habe ich über die Webseiten der Firmen geprüft. Im Impressum steht normal der richtige Name.

Zu deinem Beispiel: Nettchen der Name steht so auf der webseite im impressum. Die Taghistory* spricht da auch für sich der Name wurde vor 1 Jahr auf großbuchstaben geändert von jemanden der 36 bearbeitungen hat. 
Auch auf Facebook  schreibt der Laden sich selber in kleinbuchstaben*
Nur weil am Laden ein Schild in Großbuchstaben hängt ist das nicht gleich so das die Firma auch in Großbuchstaben geschrieben wird. 

gruß puma515

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424765305/history#map=11/53.9094/9.6893

https://www.facebook.com/BistroNettchen
Svalbard (2022-01-27 21:35:33+00:00): Hallo puma515, was gilt hauptsächlich für OSM? OTG = on the ground und das ist z. B. das Schild das im/am Laden hängt: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=179539587402204

Warum sprichst Du Einträgen von jemanden mit wenigen Changesets die Glaubwürdigkeit ab?

Gruß Svalbard
puma515 (2022-01-27 22:41:04+00:00): Ich sprech niemanden die Glaubwürdigkeit ab. 
Aber neue Nutzer mit wenigen bearbeitungen machen öffter mal fehler. (wobei das ja kein fehler war da der name ja so am laden steht)

Die Quellen die ich genannt habe belagen das der Laden kleingeschrieben wird. Das du andra meinung bist ist ja ok aber die OTG Regel ändert nix daran da ich ja belegen kann warum ich das so bearbeitet habe. 

so wie immer bei OSM gibt es mehrere Richtige Lösungen

Sowohl großgeschrieben als auch kleingeschrieben ist nicht falsch.

Nicht für jeden bearbeitung muss man vor ort sein. Einges kenn ich noch durch radtouren vom letzten herbst aber das meiste was osm jetz tnoch anzeigt in IZ müsste vor ort geprüft werden. 
Wen dich in der gegend so gut auskennst vieleicht ein Projekt für dich.
PierZen (2023-04-02 16:19:17+00:00): Voici un impact de vos ajouts de baies le long de la zone côtière Baie-James, Baie d'Hudson cela sans discussion préalable avec la communauté du Québec. Vous avez ajouté un nombre considérable de chemins alourdissant la gestion de toutes les relations qui touchent la zone côtière.  Pour cette relation, vous avez ajouté 436 chemins. Voir discussion sur https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2023-April/010724.html
impiaaa (2022-01-27 15:59:09+00:00): What OSM practices did the restriction violate? How does the "turn:lanes" tag indicate "no right turn on red"?
adrianb_telenav (2022-01-28 09:14:24+00:00): Hi! The relation had the tag "restriction:lanes" which is not a practice in OSM, this tag being the only one at that time in taginfo.
(https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=restriction%3Alanes#keys) 

No turn on red would have a different tagging schema. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No_turn_on_red#restriction.3Dno_turn_on_red 

Thank you for writing and please let me know if there any unclarities.
impiaaa (2022-01-28 15:12:22+00:00): The "practice" in OSM is ATYL, meaning no tags are inherently wrong. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like The page you linked says to use the tag "restriction", and the page on "lanes" describes how any tag can be combined with ":lanes", as was done here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes Finally, you have still not explained to me how any existing tags communicate that some lanes are no-right-on-red. You have removed information from the map with no adequate replacement.
adrianb_telenav (2022-01-31 10:12:40+00:00): Thank you for bringing this up, you have a point, I reverted the changeset. It was nice clarifying this matter with you, I'll keep it in mind when editing in the future.
impiaaa (2022-01-31 16:04:00+00:00): Thank you.
GeoTheExplorer (2022-02-01 21:58:34+00:00): Hello Volch, thanks for mapping! I noticed here that you removed a one way road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012480772). By removing this way, the west bound traffic cannot flow anymore as (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155477931) is set to one way east bound. On another note, I am looking at the Maxar Premium Imagery and Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=188911760096423) and it seems there is a new slip lane which bypasses the roundabout for traffic heading south (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025022866). Do these highways not exist anymore? I understand these resources might be out of date, but I believe my edits were necessary improvements to the junction. Could you please return the deleted highways and modify them as you see fit? Thank you, and let me know if you have any questions!

Best,
GeoTheExplorer
Warin61 (2022-01-27 07:09:02+00:00): Add imagery source = Maxar Prem.
Temat-Droga (2022-01-27 07:26:33+00:00): Nie wiem czemu nikt na to wcześniej nie zwrócił uwagi, obecnie skrzyżowanie jest tak jak edytowałem.
user_4493657 (2022-01-27 22:39:05+00:00): Sądząc po zdjęciu lotniczym, to skrzyżowanie wygląda, jakby potrzebowało uproszczenia.
maraf24 (2022-01-30 22:39:17+00:00): Kolejna niezrozumiała edycja. Skrzyżowanie po przebudowie wygląda przecież inaczej.
Temat-Droga (2022-02-04 21:43:52+00:00): I teraz też jest ok, chodziło o to że obecnie droga nie przebiega po linii prostej tylko ma wyspe z zakazem ruchu
maraf24 (2022-02-11 20:44:30+00:00): Tam nie ma wyspy z zakazem ruchu.
osmviborg (2022-01-27 07:50:00+00:00): Hej. Hvis adressepunktet er placeret forkert, så skal du rette henvendelse til Aalborg Kommune. Det er kommunen som er ansvarlig for placeringen. Adressepunktet vil automatisk blive flyttet tilbage.
osmviborg (2022-01-27 08:00:04+00:00): Jeg har tilføjet 'hgv=destination'.
Note_Fixer (2022-01-27 21:28:16+00:00): there is no water it is a dry hole.
ElliottPlack (2022-02-26 06:35:46+00:00): Hi there, this changeset description says "Adding details" when it actually deletes quite a few things. Could you explain why you deleted all these things?

Thanks,

Elliott 
OSMF Data Working Group
nickvet419 (2022-02-27 15:14:38+00:00): that is why they are marked intermittent as they only usually have water in them during rain and snow events.
skyper (2022-01-28 14:56:30+00:00): Hello hulocal
I have some questions and remarks about your changes:
1. Why do you use multipolygon relations with only one outer for the shelter/hut and the platform. I think the closed ways themselves with the tags would work perfectly without any relations.
2. If you change an area from a closed way to a multipolygon relation, like the platform, please, always replace the way by the relation in all route relations the way is member of.
3. If you want to group the infrastructure of a halt, a stop area relation ( `type=public_transport` + `public_transport=stop_area`) is the way to go.

Regards skyper
hulocal (2022-02-15 11:22:00+00:00): Hello skyper,
Thanks for your comment and explanations.
I've "only" added the hut and vending machine like it was possible while mobile in my ipad application "Go Map" and don't know how the relation stuff happened.
I've attempted to correct the changes for the hut and ticket machine with iD in CS 117430999, if it's still not right then please feel free to undo my changes completely.
Regards
skyper (2022-02-15 16:35:23+00:00): Hi hulocal
Thanks for your answer.
With your explanation I fear there is a bug in "Go Map" and it should also offer to move the memberships or at least warn about them. Additionally, `area=*` is none-sense on MP-Relations. You might want to inform the developers of "Go Map".

The shelter seems to be fine, now, though it would have been better to simply move the tags from the MP-relation to the outer way instead of deleting both and redrawing the way.

I have fixed the platform in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117443317.
Reverting does not help us and the most important part, is to understand the problems and hopefully fix them, to not stumble over them again on the next changes in the future.

Take care,
skyper
Note_Fixer (2022-01-27 21:40:09+00:00): the highway crosses the creek and goes south west not over the hole in the ground.
nickvet419 (2022-01-28 13:11:46+00:00): Not really sure what you mean by that..  I can check the master plan again.
nickvet419 (2022-01-28 14:26:47+00:00): I rechecked the plan,  the alignment is correct.
Note_Fixer (2022-01-28 16:01:02+00:00): you need to add your source to the discussion, this is a dead link http://www.elginohare-westbypass.org
the master plain.
Note_Fixer (2022-01-28 16:03:34+00:00): i am on the ground and seeing this built in real time.
nickvet419 (2022-01-28 18:28:11+00:00): I also compared the plans with recent imagery of new bridge supports and dirt mounds and they do match up. this is the sight with related documentation.  https://www.illinoistollway.com/projects  The I-490 has multiple pages and document links.
4004 (2022-01-31 00:41:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9452058063 ?
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 07:55:49+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:唐山}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 07:57:35+00:00): 顺便，给唐山本地编辑者“渤海西岸”留下一句话，这个不是我们不懂标签，而是我们确实用错了，heath指的是一种西欧的植物形成的特定生态系统，而不是我们印象里的荒草地。heath现在在编辑器里面已经改过来了，也提醒我逐步消除滥用了
若贵地真的有西欧生态环境，还请直接拿证据巴我脸改回来
渤海西岸 (2022-01-27 08:39:49+00:00): 以前我们都是用heath标注的待开发和拆迁地块，现在已修改成棕地了
渤海西岸 (2022-01-27 08:41:03+00:00): 剩下的就是真的scrub了
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 08:50:11+00:00): 没办法，您实在大名远扬，外国编辑者看不懂，但是中国编辑者都知道您嘴非常臭（比我骂人都狠），我不得不加这条comment，免得您直接喷我“外地人不懂别瞎改”
（没想到您本尊果然来了，而且发现这个changeset这么快）

不过总之没改错，那就是好事，好！
渤海西岸 (2022-01-27 08:58:50+00:00): 没事，还是欢迎有益的编辑的，其实我说的外地人应该是外国人才对
渤海西岸 (2022-01-27 11:37:35+00:00): 还有，我好像没在这里骂过人
user_5359 (2022-02-01 16:29:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(nwr%5B%22GRUPPE%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=61.17612;10.18015;8&R. What is the meaning of the keys 
GRUPPE 
HOVEDGRUPPE 
KOMMUNE 
TYPE 
ssr:stedsnr
eggie (2022-01-27 08:54:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 07:59:05+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:三河}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 07:59:51+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:固安}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;