piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-04-18 20:32:48+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Seandebasti (2019-05-18 16:11:52+00:00): Hi, be aware that imagery is not recent what you used for power lines. this way 307968471 is splitted due to new Digital Globe. I corrected it
Msiipola (2025-01-31 14:07:25+00:00): I området finns många grindar som har ett nummer som namn. Vad innebär det?
Tomas Marklund (2025-01-31 15:45:06+00:00): Skjutfältet är uppdelat i olika områden vilka antingen är öppna för allmänheten eller avlysta pga nån verksamhet. Bommarna sitter på gränserna mellan dessa områden och är märkta med ett nummer. 

Kunde nog lika gärna vara ref=*, men jag kan misstänka lite "map for the renderer" här eftersom name alltid visas på kartan, men ref oftast INTE gör det. 

Ser att samtliga (?) är skapade för 16 år sedan med name-taggen redan då, och sen har den visst blivit kvar.
Msiipola (2025-01-31 15:58:14+00:00): Ok, jag har låtit numren/namnen vara kvar, då jag inte förstod syftet. Du får gärna ändra om så tycker.
Hjart (2019-04-19 06:10:40+00:00): Jeg har rettet stranden ved Skærbæk tilbage.Bemærk at den er lavet som en multipolygon og at den var korrekt som den var.
Lytter1 (2019-04-19 18:19:22+00:00): Tak for det, så kan jeg se at Potlatch 2, havde ikke opsat den som en multiplygon, så jeg må hellere dobbelttjekke med ID fremadrettet.
viloan (2019-04-18 20:50:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BCNorwich (2019-04-24 07:02:40+00:00): Hi, You placed the building data on every node as well as building outlines. I've removed the data placed on the building nodes as its unnecessary multiple duplication of data.

Regards Bernard
UpakOffka (2019-04-21 15:56:13+00:00): Здравствуйте, Михаил, подскажите что за правки такие массовые у вас? Откуда данные? На примере города Нерюнгри вы проставили адреса объектам у которых их нет.
aseerel4c26 (2019-04-18 22:41:08+00:00): Hi mapy123,  es wäre super, wenn du die ids der notes angeben würdest, damit man die Quellen nachvollziehen kann. Wenn ich recht sehe, hast du hier Notes von anonymen usern verarbeitet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1646421 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1565460 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1670863 ), die nicht zwangsweise darauf schließen lassen, dass hier vor Ort besichtigt wurde  -  es könnte auch beispielsweise google maps sein.  Hast du denn vor Ort nachgeprüft?
aseerel4c26 (2019-04-24 05:05:26+00:00): (mappy123 angemailt)
aseerel4c26 (2019-04-26 20:31:01+00:00): Mangels Klarstellung die zweifelhaften, durch mich nicht bestätigbaren, Änderungen rückgängig gemacht (siehe note 1565460 und 1670863), um unsere Datenqualität zu wahren und das Risiko urheberrechtlicher Verschmutzung zu minimieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69614862
kreuzschnabel (2019-12-24 08:26:04+00:00): Hallo geograf_mabar, sind die Wege um die Enzianhütte wirklich access=no, also komplett gesperrt, auch für Fußgänger? An https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684672196 passt einiges nicht zusammen – gepflastert (surface=paving_stones), aber so gut wie gar nicht befahrbar (smoothness=very_horrible) und obendrein für niemanden legal nutzbar? Daraus werd ich nicht schlau.
GerdP (2022-05-09 07:36:56+00:00): Hi!
Bitte prüfen: https://www.osm.org/way/30140284 ist ganz offensichtlich keine Brücke, zumindest nicht auf der ganzen Länge.  Auf Bing erkenne ich da gar keine Brücke, eher einen Düker, sprich, der stream https://www.osm.org/way/339889053 müsste geteilt werden und ein Stück mit tunnel=culvert und layer=-1 erfasst werden.
Glassman (2019-04-19 02:04:59+00:00): Tip: We use full spellings for street names. The reason is that computers have a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69361523
Glassman (2019-04-19 02:05:17+00:00): I went ahead and fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69361523
ABausD (2019-04-19 10:05:05+00:00): Danke das du so viele Fehler behoben hast. Beim Parkhaus ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684680965 ) wäre aber ein Besuch vor Ort gut gewesen. Der Grundriss ist ein andere wie auf den Bing Bilder zu erkennen. Dort ist noch das alte Parkhaus zusehen. Die Verkehrsführung hat sich auch geändert. Leider hatte ich noch keine Zeit das in Ruhe vor Ort anzuschauen.
gscholz (2019-04-19 05:55:58+00:00): Hi,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self-intersecting ways:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-50.40400&lat=-0.41497&zoom=11

Can you please fix this?

Guido
gscholz (2019-05-01 07:42:03+00:00): Hi Fordeli,
this error still exits, can you please take over responsibility and fix this?

Guido
NikAlmino (2019-05-06 23:53:21+00:00): I am having to fix several errors, but I will have to revert all related changesets.

My 103 changesets are totally in conflict, many mistakes, mostly involving relationships.
Ana Palmero (2019-04-18 23:02:44+00:00): http://venezporn.com
Daniel Mendoza99 (2019-04-18 23:22:50+00:00): http://hacermacetas.com
Daniel Mendoza99 (2019-04-18 23:26:27+00:00): http://puroanal.com
stevea (2019-04-21 15:15:26+00:00): Adam, I'd like to ask you to please take a look at our wiki pages about this (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_admin_level is a start, where it is said that over 50,000 population is a city).

Many of the 30 changes you made seem OK, especially the small rocks, however, San Mateo (105,000), Richmond (104,000), Antioch (103,000), Concord (122,000), Hayward (150,000), Sunnyvale (140,000), Napa (80,000), Vallejo (116,000), Fairfield (115,000), Fremont (230,000), Alameda (80,000), Santa Clara (117,000), Tracy (83,000), Mountain View (74,000), Palo Alto (64,000) and even Petaluma (58,000) are all cities, not towns.  Please change these to place=city as they are fully deserving of this key:value pair based on their populations.  I suspect you may be tagging for the renderer (an OSM no-no) or how the cities names display.  But it's all about the data and tagging accurately.  Thank you!
Adam Schneider (2019-04-21 16:28:03+00:00): I did it based on the guidance on the "place=city" Wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity#United_States), which specifically uses Alameda as an example of a place that should be tagged as a town instead of a city based on its proximity to Oakland and San Francisco.  Others are very similarly eclipsed by neighbors (like San Mateo, Antioch, and Santa Clara).

The others are admittedly judgement calls.  I suppose Napa and Petaluma should probably be cities since they're a little further out, but I think anything in the central Bay Area other than SJ, SF, and Oakland would be better tagged as towns.
stevea (2019-04-21 21:13:41+00:00): Hm, cities with hundreds of thousands of people (just in your list alone:  Fremont, with nearly a quarter-million — that's a town?!, Santa Clara, Fairfield, Vallejo, Sunnyvale, Hayward, Richmond, San Mateo), those REALLY should be place=city, I believe there is no good argument to be made there, despite the Alameda example (which is relatively recent wiki addition).

I'd go by a much wider (countrywide) interpretation of this tag.  While I notice variations here (as I look), too, clearly, calling 100,000+ cities "towns" needs correction back to place=city.  (Please).

I'd also argue that the section/example of Alameda because it is "based on its proximity" (to larger cities) is suspect at a minimum and perhaps ought to be removed.  This is either "disregard reality," "tag for the renderer" or both, and I don't believe OSM wants to do that.
Adam Schneider (2019-04-21 22:47:18+00:00): As I said, they're judgement calls, and that Wiki entry (in my reading) specifically says that numbers mean less than common sense.  Sure, you shouldn't "tag for the renderer," but in a sense ALL tags are for the renderer; they give guidance as to priority.  If someone develops a mapping application based solely on OSM data, and it draws a map of the entire west coast, there isn't room to list every city... and do you really want Santa Clara to have an equal chance of being displayed as San Jose?  That makes no sense.  The solution would be a new "large_city" or "megacity" tag or something, but we don't have that.

Anyway, I'd argue strongly that Santa Clara and Sunnyvale absolutely should NOT get top billing because they're practically part of San Jose.  (Can you tell when you're leaving one and entering the other?)  Fremont and Hayward, I admit, could be cities, since they're anchoring the SE Bay.  Palo Alto probably could be a city, since it has a certain worldwide prominence, but have you ever heard someone proudly proclaim that they're from the city of San Mateo?  (I bet most people thought it was just a county.)
Adam Schneider (2019-04-21 23:12:23+00:00): By the way, I've been browsing around the country, and it's sort of interesting that few other areas have this quandary.  Seattle is sort of comparable: Kent and Renton have been designated "towns" despite having more than 100k people.  But nowhere else has such a huge concentration of massive "suburbs" (except maybe Los Angeles, and I don't know that area well enough to go poking around in their tags).
stevea (2019-04-22 19:11:36+00:00): I know the Bay Area (it's local) and I know LA (I sort of grew up there with frequent family visits).  Neither place is really a "quandary" w.r.t. to OSM:  simply map them "as they are" and let the renderer worry what to do.  Massive suburbs are massive suburbs, but that's the colloquial definition of suburb ("a city on the edge of a large city as part of a metropolitan area").  However, the OSM definition of "suburb" (from our "place" wiki) is different, and so Sunnyvale and Fremont aren't suburbs, they are cities.
Adam Schneider (2019-04-22 19:18:30+00:00): Obviously I know that "suburb" has a different meaning in OSM; I wasn't referring to the place=suburb tag.

But the renderer isn't all-knowing; we need to give it hints.  That's why the place=city page specifically says to use local knowledge when deciding between city and town.

But I'm not going to debate it anymore.  Clearly, Steve Knows Best, as you are fond of pointing out by including your credentials and accolades in your messages.  I will leave you to your personal OSM fiefdom.
stevea (2019-04-22 19:37:16+00:00): It is neither kind nor fair to say "Steve Knows Best."

I am not aware of "we need to give (the renderer) hints."  Could you please point out where OSM says that?

I have added a comment to the place=city Talk page, where it may be more appropriate to take this discussion.  (Though, I'm not "shutting this one down," simply providing a wider / more appropriate audience for the topic.  We could even take it to talk-us if you like, I welcome wider discussion.  (Which 100% negates your assertion that "Steve Knows Best," as I'll accede to whatever consensus emerges).
Adam Schneider (2019-04-22 19:44:41+00:00): Sorry to have sounded harsh, but that's the impression I've had in my interactions with you.  It always feels more like accusation than collaboration.

I agree that a discussion should happen on the "place=city" Talk page.  Too bad those pages are so rarely used.
stevea (2019-04-22 19:51:15+00:00): Apology accepted, and your "putting me on notice" (I won't call it a "warning," that's too harsh a characterization) makes me "sit up straight and pay full attention" that my interaction needs improvement toward a direction that is more inclusive / collaborative.  Strive as I may to do that, it looks like I haven't done so (recently, here, I'm not sure).  Thank you for pointing that out.

I have had good luck (well, some) with Talk pages on specific wiki pages, it is one of many "channels" of communication in OSM which falls in the middle somewhere of wide coverage.  Often, only people who have also written something on the page get notified and/or pay attention, but that's more than a changeset comment like this.  (Pretty small audience, but still public).

Talk-us would be more wide still, but while it may be appropriate to go there, let's see if the place=city Talk bears fruit, if any.  I'm certain this has been more widely discusses, but like many topics, it rises, falls, then goes to sleep again, until it is resurrected and happens all over again.  Like mountain ranges, I'd love to see a "once and for all" consensus emerge, but as we both know, that can be elusive, difficult and not always permanent.

I wish us luck in these regards.  Thank you again for calling to my attention the impressions you've received from my tone.  I really do want the best data in the map, too.
Papibaquígrafo (2019-05-06 06:59:53+00:00): Estas UCs e TIs não são blocos homogêneos de floresta; há diferentes tipos de vegetação, bem como rios, vilarejos, etc ali dentro. Portanto, está incorreto adicionar a tag natural=wood.
NikAlmino (2019-05-06 23:42:50+00:00): Eu vou remover a tag natural=wood do multipolígono, quando eu delimitar as áreas que não são de floresta, eu marco como inner, mas para agora é somente excluir a tag natural=wood da relação.

Se é incorreto usar essa tag, não sei qual outra poderia substitui-la. Mas muito provavelmente vai ser removida.
NikAlmino (2019-05-06 23:43:58+00:00): Muito provavelmente também vou ter que reverter esse changeset.
rskedgell (2019-11-24 05:14:30+00:00): After you corrected these, the "mapper" who added the erroneous bicycle=yes tags re-added them, with a generous sprinkling of other irrelevant, inaccurate or fictitious tags. I've changed a few of these, but it might be worth you taking another look. I'll try to cycle over to Feltham in the next couple of weeks and upload as much imagery to Mapillary as I can.
MacLondon (2019-11-24 17:08:23+00:00): Yeah, I did notice when it all got 
re-added and more of less gave up on this patch!

I know the mistagging was accompanied by a lot of Wikipedia links to 'bicycle' etc. or 'name=Sidewalk', but I can see that at least some of these have been removed since. Some very small 'suburbs' mapped here too, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252962090

Some basic background info I have of the area if you do cycle there:
I know the area just to the south of Feltham station has had major roadwork work over the past year or so which is probably still ongoing,

A temporary footbridge over the former level crossing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447285777 was built with a plan to build a proper permanent bridge nearby for pedestrians/cyclists, possibly as part of the station.
rskedgell (2019-12-19 15:37:20+00:00): I think I've fixed most of these now, but there was another spate of sidewalk/footways turned into fantasy bicycle=yes ways in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78522114 

I have reverted this changeset, but unfortunately not before they had propagated to OpenCycleMap tiles).

I'll be back again in the next week or two to capture some more Mapillary imagery.
Minh Nguyen (2022-06-13 23:42:22+00:00): Hi, should the speed limit on this bridge be 10 mph, as opposed to 10 km/h as it’s currently tagged?
viloan (2019-04-19 00:53:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DiogenesVieira (2019-04-19 01:58:28+00:00): Obrigado pela recepção!

Tenho alguma experiência e edição de mapas. Colaborei por muitos anos para o projeto tracksource e sou colaborador do google mapas.
DiogenesVieira (2019-04-19 14:29:23+00:00): ok
viloan (2019-04-19 01:36:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-19 07:46:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69368037 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more Rochester sockpuppetry - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2614 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-19 07:46:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69368037 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more Rochester sockpuppetry - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2614 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-19 07:46:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69368037 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more Rochester sockpuppetry - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2614 etc.
DressyPear4 (2019-04-19 11:20:46+00:00): Olá, seria bom usar uma descrição nas edições que você está fazendo, facilita para outros mapeadores.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69363560
viloan (2019-04-19 02:29:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
maraf24 (2019-04-19 08:27:40+00:00): Wandalizm - mapowanie pod Pokemon Go.
Wycofane.
maraf24 (2019-04-19 08:26:54+00:00): Fałszywy park - wandalizm. Usunięte.
GinaroZ (2019-04-19 14:13:58+00:00): Thanks for the edit - surprised no one else has noticed this before now!
I've changed the path to a cycleway though as there's a sign and space for bikes.
jguthula (2019-04-22 09:41:29+00:00): Thanks for your complements GinaroZ. We are looking forward to work along with the local community and learn more from them. If there are any insights that you want to share, please feel free to reach us out.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:50:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
literan (2019-04-20 11:16:57+00:00): поставили hgv=no на линию метро, кремлевские куранты сбросили с башни... Откатываю https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69365804
literan (2019-04-20 11:10:12+00:00): не no, а destination, см. вики и ПДД
literan (2019-04-20 11:15:07+00:00): На снимках 2018 года знаков ограничения не видно, вы уверены что они там есть?