piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-07-14 20:38:37+00:00): Man, I checked ukrainian cadastre, and moldovan, and this layer is not actual, the info from this window check old ukrainian cadastre informations.
See these:
https://ibb.co/5LMDYTm
https://ibb.co/BZH5RZk
https://ibb.co/qCf0V4Y
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-07-14 21:07:35+00:00): https://ibb.co/4f7KxBQ
dudka (2019-07-15 10:54:54+00:00): How do you know this layer is not actual? Boundary is the same as was in 1991 and has not changed since that time. You can see also old soviet map on map.land.gov.ua
dudka (2019-07-15 10:55:49+00:00): Can you share any map showing this forest as territory of Moldova?
dudka (2019-07-15 11:05:10+00:00): http://atu.gki.com.ua/ua/karta#map=13//48.02249341972485//29.15273877664156&&layer=8906587201596708-1,100//7376316114267884-1,100&&action=info-7376316114267884,7649
dudka (2019-07-15 11:18:06+00:00): https://geoportal.md/en/default/map#lat=316977.547370&lon=255140.950725&zoom=4&layers=66,_base6,_base4
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-07-15 11:53:51+00:00): No, it's not the same, see these maps:
https://ibb.co/L84PXJJ
https://ibb.co/5kmYC51
https://ibb.co/TPNFpLZ
https://ibb.co/HtKjWPN
https://ibb.co/S7FGmtP
Moldova don't control the border on the transnistrian segment to mark or fix the border line, moldovan cadastre don't have ortophotos from this sector to mark the border.
dudka (2019-07-15 11:58:06+00:00): Both cadastres show this forest as territory of Ukraine. Why should we change it? Why do you send links to different segments?
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-07-15 12:19:58+00:00): Are you really? Ukrainian cadastre say that this forest is a territory of Moldova, I said you that Moldova don't control and don't have ortophotos of these borders to fix them. I send you these links to present you that from 1991 the borders were changed, and see these segments and see the difference between old and new borders.
dudka (2019-07-15 12:37:04+00:00): Ukrainian cadastre doesn't say that this forest is a territory of Moldova. Green lines are the lines of cadastral quarters and not the boundary of Ukraine. Cadastral quarters don't cover entire Ukraine, there are some gaps like you found on several places. Moldovian geoportal shows some numbered points which has not been changed. Ukrainian geoportal(http://atu.gki.com.ua) shows this forest as part of 'Лабушненська сільська рада'. Soviet maps shows it as ukrainian. What else do you need?
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-07-15 12:49:38+00:00): This map (http://atu.gki.com.ua) shows only administrative-territorial units, and not the borders, the green line (in general) cross exactly the border that moldovan cadastre mark as a border. Soviet map don't have the power on this decisions, because the borders from soviet period have changed, and I presented you some ideal examples.
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-07-15 12:51:12+00:00): Why on ukrainian cadastre map is not presented the border? I can answer that question - because this extremal green line is the border in conformity with ukrainian part.
dudka (2019-07-15 12:59:46+00:00): border of Ukraing is marked in blue
https://ibb.co/MkzDgSK
it's displayed on different zoom levels
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-07-15 13:14:03+00:00): Man, I said you just before that this line is not the border, this line present the soviet border with some fixes.
Case 1 -
How it was in the soviet period: https://ibb.co/JR9kNDg
How this is now: https://ibb.co/vkwprLX
Case 2 -
How it was in the soviet period: https://ibb.co/mchFbvD
How this is now: https://ibb.co/263WKtr
Case 3 - 
How it was in the soviet period: https://ibb.co/JpZ8RS4
How this is now: https://ibb.co/rwx7cmr
진달래개나리 (2019-07-09 23:47:18+00:00): 설명 수정합니다. 전북대학교 수정 x
영등동 및 부송동 일대 수정
AdamPlayer (2019-07-10 00:39:32+00:00): I don't think that the bridge is considered a piece of artwork. I think that tag is more for sculptures and murals. Maybe add as a loc_name key on the bridge?
Leo Slager (2019-07-10 09:29:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-07-10 09:31:15+00:00): In NL is het gebruikelijk om de bedrijfsgegevens toe te voegen aan de adres-node die rechtstreeks werd geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster, evenals de gebouwen.
ik verander het even.
AdamPlayer (2019-07-10 00:39:47+00:00): I don't think that the bridge is considered a piece of artwork. I think that tag is more for sculptures and murals. Maybe add as a loc_name key on the bridge?
Felipe Alves (2019-07-10 13:45:45+00:00): Oi, Hebert.
Não é correto usar as linas das vias como limites para áreas.
Hebert F Nogueira (2019-07-10 14:20:03+00:00): Corrigido. Obrigado.
user_6110846 (2019-07-11 20:02:42+00:00): Again you ignore https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2793: to make changes to the work of Poliakoff Mykhailo - you need to ask permission from DWG

About landuse = greenfield in the village of Bondarnia



Ти повторно ігноруєш https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2793
: щоб вносити зміни у роботу Poliakoff Mykhailo - потрібно запитувати дозвіл у DWG  
про landuse=greenfield в селі Бондарня
KKS (2019-07-11 23:41:50+00:00): знову якусь херню змолов. Перестань гадить в каментах, та навіть причину не можеш пояснить нормально... "ти поламав шось на комп'ютері, пруф - карта світу".

Навчись писать букви нормально і номально складать в речення, а потім шастай по коментам.
user_6110846 (2019-07-12 10:59:12+00:00): Stop touching the objects that I created
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2793 

It is written that without the permission of DWG - it is forbidden to you to process these objects

You have made landuse=greenfield changes without DWG permission - this is the ignoring of the DWG requirement


Перестань трогать обєкти які я створив 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2793 
написано , що без дозволу DWG - заборонено тобі переробляти ці об'єкти 

Ти вносив зміни у landuse-greenfield без дозволу DWG - це і є ігнорування вимоги DWG
KKS (2019-07-12 19:18:13+00:00): Об'єкти які ти створив зберігаються у тебе вдома в туалеті. А це публічна карта, де кожен може вносити правки.
Дам тобі одну останню безкоштовну пораду: не хочеш шоб лізли в твою роботу - роби її добре. Але то сильно складно для тебе.
Dimacn (2019-07-18 19:27:55+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение карты. Но к вам есть замечания. 1. Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  2. Не бывает названия у парковок - "парковка". В name пишем только официальные названия https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  3. Названия на жилых домах не вписываются. 4. Пожалуйста исправьте.
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-30 21:18:29+00:00): Your fire hydrant at 21st and Peoria is in the middle of the left southbound lane of Peoria.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72074405
Happy Hobo (2019-07-30 22:44:34+00:00): Must have been a major GPS error at that time.  I moved it to a white spot in the aerial that is _probably_ the correct location.
mavl (2019-09-04 16:05:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74095423]
AdamPlayer (2019-07-10 20:58:06+00:00): These areas appear to be grass areas, not parks.
JeroenHoek (2021-10-25 12:21:36+00:00): The image-link you introduced here and used for 75 banks is now broken. The image-tag is not meant for generic images or logos, but for photographs of the actual entity. So you out a link to a photo of the building that houses a specific bank there, but probably not a generic image.

You might want to consider cleaning up those image-tags.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=image&value=http%3A%2F%2Fefectococuyo.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F03%2F740x339xbanco-venezuela-1.jpg.pagespeed.ic.H0bVXZO5mH.jpg
JeroenHoek (2021-10-25 12:22:08+00:00): "So you out a" → "So you could"
BCNorwich (2019-07-10 13:24:42+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The Esri World Imagery (available in the background settings) will show a more up to date picture of the area. There you can clearly see your new building is not what is on the ground. If you meant to map that feature as residential area the tag would be landuse=residential not building=house.

You can also see that the water tower is still there so I've reinstated it.

If you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-25 09:08:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126607484 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
nevw (2019-07-10 07:59:09+00:00): Hi, you could use add the sidewalk tag to the roadway to indicate the footways.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-25 09:08:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126607484 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
chachafish (2020-02-21 18:44:46+00:00): Hello, thank you for your additions to OSM. Are you certain about this fire station? It does not align with satellite imagery and the buildings here seem very much like residential homes. Thank you
mapman44 (2019-07-10 13:24:53+00:00): Thanks for your edits! It would be helpful to leave a comment with more detail about your edits. "Updating" doesn't tell other editors much, and usually would mean that you were changing existing features. In most of your changesets you are actually adding buildings, gravel pits, service roads, etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72077048
mapman44 (2019-07-11 23:53:50+00:00): Please draw the buildings to match the actual shape of the building and use the "q" key to square up the corners. And please do not ignore the suggestions to you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72077048
pnorman (2020-08-19 21:07:23+00:00): Hello,

in this changeset you added information about a US brand to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1025515807/history and changed it from fast_food to a restaurant. I've reverted these changes since they're wrong. This pizza place isn't part of a US chain.
Mark4242 (2020-08-25 00:58:28+00:00): Ah sorry about that. Thanks for fixing it!
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
iriman (2019-07-10 14:32:01+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز. این خیابان از زیر پل میگذره و خودش پل نیست. اصلاح شد
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72077584
Asgari Mohsen (2019-07-10 14:35:11+00:00): قبلا نوعش تونل بود 
میدونم خیابون از زیر پل میگذره دوست من
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72077584
iriman (2019-07-10 14:54:11+00:00): مشکل این بود که تونل رو به پل تغییر داده بودین و لایه رو هم به ۱. درنتیجه پل قطار و خیابان زیرش در یک لایه قرار گرفته بودند.
iriman (2019-07-10 21:47:46+00:00): البته این که تونل نیست رو درست میفرمایید. مشخصه تونل رو حذف کردم و تبدیل به یک خیابان معمولی شد.
ساختار پل برای اون قسمت از ریل همچنان باقی میمونه تا وضعیت راهها در اون نقطه مشخص باشه.
iriman (2019-07-10 14:37:50+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز. ریل راه‌آهن روی پل قرار داره و با خیابان زیرش تقاطع نداره. بنابراین نباید نقطه مشترک داشته باشند و نیازی هم به
railway=level_crossing
نیست. 
اطلاعات بیشتر درباره این تگ:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dlevel_crossing

این اشکال اصلاح شد.

لطفا به گروه تلگرامی
https://t.me/OpenStreetMapIr
یا تالار گفتگوی 
https://forum.osm.org/viewforum.php?id=103
تشریف بیارید و در جمع کاربران ایرانی سوالاتتون رو بپرسید.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
mapman44 (2019-07-10 13:18:58+00:00): Thanks for your edits! It would be helpful to leave a comment with more detail about your edits. "Updating" doesn't tell other editors much.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72077756
user_5359 (2019-07-22 04:50:17+00:00): Hello! You add different ways with the only key "boy hostel". I assumed you miss to add building=yes, tourism=hostel and name=... (details see wiki.osm.org.
If you need help, You are welcome.
freebeer (2019-09-10 16:10:02+00:00): hallo,
for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702970909 you must mean lanes=1 ?

just want to verify there are no other possibilities before i repair the same quietly.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-09-11 03:52:33+00:00): Hello freebeer

Maybe the mapper on changeset/71164583 means as you say. I agree with you.
Thank you.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:37:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
santamariense (2019-07-10 11:41:20+00:00): Olá. Estive revisando sua edição. Um ou mais problemas foram encontrados. 
Não se deve colar áreas (como as de praças) aos eixos das ruas. Como estava antes de tu editar estava correto.
Dúvidas? Quer trocar conhecimentos com outros colaboradores? Participe do grupo OSM RS no Telegram: https://t.me/osmrs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72078161
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-25 09:08:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126607484 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
Leo Slager (2019-07-10 09:50:30+00:00): Top
Als er vragen zijn, stel ze gerust.
Of op het forum, of via PB aan mij.
Het lijkt allemaal zo eenvoudig, maar er zit meer achter als je denkt.
mapman44 (2019-07-10 13:18:09+00:00): Thanks for your edits! It would be helpful to leave a comment with more detail about your edits. "Updating" doesn't tell other editors much.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72078424
Frans S (2019-07-25 12:29:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. A request. 
Please use the MAXAR P imagery at next mappings, More recent and very good to map from. I correct your mappings, Esri gives not detailed info. What I do see is that you did not square a number of buildings. Please use the Q key every time you mapped a building.
Frans S (2019-07-20 17:04:53+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping here.
Please pay more attention on precise mapping. Your mappings looks sloppy, because they are oversized and not squared. Do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping and square each building with the Q key in iD editor,
please take a look to this page with your mappings and the changes which has been made
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72465585 
red are your mappings, green  the adjustments
best regards
Frans S (2019-07-18 14:26:00+00:00): Hello. A remark. Please map more precise and square the buildings you have mapped. 
Use the Maxar P imagery.
best regards
Please take a look to these documents. Might be helpful
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bS_TVHPFHKKVBSdjx3RRQdxhdWrMJ3wdEh_BSnsL4hI                     https://drive.google.com/open?id=1N1rXlAyGcJ6VJ2p3qbD4PRsuo65o3pC5yHB2wq1TGEc
Best regards and keep mapping
PT-53 (2020-07-26 09:18:24+00:00): Hallo q_un_go,
ist diese Straßensperrung wegen Sanierungsarbeiten an der Brücke
noch aktuell und wie lange dauert es evtl. noch an?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144826525/history
Grüße
Frans S (2019-07-19 09:15:41+00:00): Hello, Please use the Maxar P image to map from. Much clearer and more recent
Here are a few documents which might be useful.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bS_TVHPFHKKVBSdjx3RRQdxhdWrMJ3wdEh_BSnsL4hI                     https://drive.google.com/open?id=1N1rXlAyGcJ6VJ2p3qbD4PRsuo65o3pC5yHB2wq1TGEc
best regards
Frans S (2019-07-16 09:36:41+00:00): Hello. I am reviewing tasks and have a remark
Please use the Maxar Imagery since this is more recent and very clear to map from
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2019-07-15 10:18:38+00:00): Hello Zohreh. Thanks for mapping here. I am reviewing mappings and comment on these.
First. Review your mapping skills please. Round buildings can be mapped very easily . See the instructions and the how to pages
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
Beneath the buildings you will see shadows. do not map these as part of your building.
When you are interested in the way Maasai people organize their settlements please take a look here
http://www.johntyman.com/africa/
Best regards
Kovoschiz (2019-07-10 10:54:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72080149
Palolo (2019-07-18 19:12:00+00:00): Do you have local knowledge about the attributes you have added? Please follow the HOT instructions and only use the building=yes tag.
iriman (2019-07-10 11:33:16+00:00): سلام. به جمع نقشه‌کش‌های اواس‌ام خوش اومدین. یه سوالی، اون چهار تا پله ورودی چارسوق جمع شده؟
Frans S (2019-07-21 10:38:57+00:00): Hello.  I am reviewing mappings and have some remarks.
Please check if a building is round by watching the shadow on the ground of that object. If its round,  its a round building. otherwise rectangular.
No shadow at all, not a building
Both shadows in and outside an object?  no building 
best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2019-07-21 10:44:26+00:00): Hello, Back again
pls take a look to this page where you can see your mappings and the modifications has been made
Best regards
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72479363
Frans S (2019-07-11 17:45:20+00:00): Hello Meenu. Thanks for Joining the team
you just mapped 1 building and not as it should be. 
First. This is not a building.  on Bing a very small object not worth mapping. Maxar P , very clear image shows nothing.
Keep yourself to the instructions how to map and to tag.  No naming of building etc. Just tag building=yes.
best regards
Frans S (2019-07-10 15:48:43+00:00): Hello Sujith. I am reviewing this changeset as well to see how this is mapped. 
Here I see that you also mapped a building twice. First of all. Please use Maxar P imagery for next mappings. Most recent and very clear.
Rectangular buildings should have just 4 nodes. L shape buildings 6. more complicated buildings have so many nodes as necessary . Always square the buildings you have mapped. Q key
best regards
I corrected the errors you've made here
Frans S (2019-07-10 13:34:41+00:00): Hello Shrikant Sahu. Thanks for mapping here. A remark. You are making beginners errors. First of all. Why calling an settlement here as Leisure=park.This is the land where the Maasai people live. When you are interested in how they organize their settlements , please take a look here.  Correct mapping should be landuse=residential. There is no need to map them as such. The 2 other mappings which you tag as building=yes are fenced areas next to the settlement. Should not be mapped.
http://www.johntyman.com/africa/
Please use the MAXAR P imagery for next mappings. Bing is rather old. I corrected them. 
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2019-07-10 14:24:04+00:00): Here is a link to the achavi website where you can see your mappings as well the modifications which has been made. See the legend and help for assistance
best regards
Frans S (2019-08-19 14:31:38+00:00): Hello Niyaz. Thanks for mapping here.
A request. Will you please square the rectangular buildings with the Q key in ID editor. You missed quite a number.
Best regards and keep mapping
Kovoschiz (2019-07-10 10:54:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72080149
tux67 (2019-07-10 07:59:02+00:00): This is a private property - any reason to add a service road here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72079716
freebeer (2019-07-10 09:17:54+00:00): while it can be seen from aerial imageries that it obviously exists.

and it can be used for deliveries, paper routes, and visitors even if irrelevant to the general public other than being a landmark for orientation.

any good reason not to add it?  access can be tuned to fit, but as a dead end, i see no reason for a router to consider it.
rmmunnan (2019-07-10 09:50:50+00:00): Hi tux67 & freebeer,

Thanks for your comments. From Satellite imagery and our delivery partners GPS traces we identified it to be a missing road so added the service road over here. We don't have a valid source to validate if it is a private road or publicly accessible road so didn't add any further information. If you have local information of this road being private, happy to add that information as well.

Regards,
rmmunnan
Frans S (2019-07-13 10:37:48+00:00): Hello Jagriti This task has been mapped very sloppy ( See also my previous comments) 
See this webpage where you can review your mappings and the adjustments which has been made > you mapped a number of spots which are no buildings at all. This  settlement is mainly abandoned with a few buildings left.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72206632
Best regards
Kovoschiz (2019-07-10 10:54:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72080149
Frans S (2019-09-15 11:58:04+00:00): Hello.
I am a validator who review mappings.
A remark
Please map round buildings in IDeditor with the round building tool.  Draw a triangle over the edge over the building and press on the O key.
In these settlements are often open areas used to keep live stock. surrounded by hedges, Do not map them as a building. You can recognise them on their size and shadow. they show a shadow both on the in- and outside.
Best regards and keep mapping
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-11 11:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72131578 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.
Frans S (2019-07-19 08:30:40+00:00): Hello RajeshSub. Thank you for mapping here.
A remark See the instructions how to tag a building. Building=house is not used here
Also use the Maxar P imagery. More recent and very clear
See also these documents
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bS_TVHPFHKKVBSdjx3RRQdxhdWrMJ3wdEh_BSnsL4hI                     https://drive.google.com/open?id=1N1rXlAyGcJ6VJ2p3qbD4PRsuo65o3pC5yHB2wq1TGEc
Best regards
tux67 (2019-07-10 07:58:13+00:00): This is a private property .. any particular reason to add a service road here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72080052
freebeer (2019-07-10 09:26:19+00:00): while it can be seen from aerial imageries that it obviously exists.

and it can be used for deliveries, paper routes, and visitors even if irrelevant to the general public other than being a landmark for orientation.

any good reason not to add it? access can be tuned to fit, but as a dead end, i see no reason for a router to consider it.
shishf (2019-07-10 09:46:14+00:00): Hi tux67 & freebeer,

Thanks for your comments. From Satellite imagery and our delivery partners GPS traces we identified it to be a missing road so added the service road over here. We don't have a valid source to validate if it is a private road or publicly accessible road so didn't add any further information. If you have local information of this road being private, happy to add that information as well.

Regards,
Shishf
tux67 (2019-07-10 10:52:43+00:00): @Shishf 
the way it as been added indicates that there is only one way to access the house number 3 and 1 and now people would access via OSM through the farm  working area, while the 2nd access is hidden under a tree heading towards north from house no 1.