piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2016-09-01 08:37:29+00:00): I suspect what's happening here is that ENSG Battir is trying to delete a number of duplicately-imported and overlapping walls.  Have a look at a small area in an editor and you'll see the problem - lots of duplicate nodes, and also duplicated features (walls so close together with no access points that makes it clear that they've not been properly surveyed).
See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37757548
Je soupçonne que ce qui se passe ici est que ENSG Battir tente de supprimer un certain nombre de murs duplicately importés et qui se chevauchent. Jetez un oeil à une petite zone dans un éditeur et vous verrez le problème - beaucoup de nœuds en double, et dispose également dupliqués (murs si proches avec aucun point d'accès qui le rend clair qu'ils ont pas été correctement étudiés).
Voir aussi https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37757548
Venu Niwas (2017-12-25 20:17:44+00:00): Venu niwas ,plot no 3 ganesh nagar society,
Mahabaleshwar
utack (2017-12-08 16:50:17+00:00): Hi,  
ich denke mal das neue "Digital Globe Standard" Luftbild dürfte die neuen Gebäude darstellen?  
https://i.imgur.com/lBjrkQI.png  
VG
MSF-Fieldco (2016-08-31 19:31:16+00:00): Hi,
Changes should not be made based on the render. If you have problem with the render engine, the best solution is to improve it, not to remove details from the map.
eppfel (2016-08-31 12:22:31+00:00): I made these changes without savin gin between and did not know how to split them. Sry
Jacob's-Staff (2016-08-31 13:42:45+00:00): Sicher das die nun 24/7 geöffnet haben? Die Infos der Homepage besagen da was ganz anderes. War zuvor schon sehr umfassend von Palinka eingetragen.
Palinka (2016-09-02 06:45:31+00:00): Habe es wieder zurück geändert.
Jacob's-Staff (2016-09-02 08:26:16+00:00): Danke fürs verifizieren.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-09-02 20:04:31+00:00): Targowisko nie ma numeru domu.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:40:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 10:00:57+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Gumeg (2017-07-22 09:55:03+00:00): Если я правильно понимаю, то это стихийная стоянка. она никак не оборудована, специально не делалась здесь. Нет ни знака, ни ограждений, никаких атрибутов автостоянки.
adrianojbr (2016-08-31 21:29:24+00:00): andré, acredito que vc colocou o endereço no objeto errado. abraço.
André Alvarenga (2016-08-31 22:08:37+00:00): Obrigado por avisar, já reverti a edição. Não faço ideia de como isso foi parar ali.
André Alvarenga (2016-08-31 23:06:05+00:00): Acho que sei qual foi o problema. O Maps.ME não encaminha as alterações imediatamente, ele faz isso de tempos em tempos (que não sei exatamente qual), especialmente se você não estiver conectado no momento da edição. 
Neste caso eu fiz a alteração e algum tempo depois atualizei o mapa. Provavelmente essa alteração ainda não tinha sido enviada e, quando foi, gerou esse problema.
Fica a dica, verificar se há alguma alteração a enviar antes de atualizar os mapas.
Abraço.
MSF-Fieldco (2016-08-31 19:31:26+00:00): Hi,
Changes should not be made based on the render. If you have problem with the render engine, the best solution is to improve it, not to remove details from the map.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:40:22+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
rosja (2016-08-31 18:39:32+00:00): Уважаемый literхn,
тогда объясните мне почему трасса Дон до Воронежа не автомагистраль. Она отвечает всем требованиям, которые прописаны по ссылке которую Вы указали.
Возможно, что на каких-то участках есть пересечения с другими дорогами, но это исключение. 
Вы ездили по этой дороге?
Прошу Вас прояснить свою позицию
literan (2016-08-31 21:23:13+00:00): Ваши слова заставляют усомниться в том, что вы читали ссылку, которую я вам привел. В одном из первых абзацев сказано "highway=motorway - автомагистрали (обозначенные знаком 5.1 "Автомагистраль")". На данном участке трассы "Дон" таких знаков нет (да и по своим характеристикам, в частности, радиусам поворотов и уклонов, он не соответствует требованиям, предъявляемым к автомагистралям). Ездил я там последний раз две недели назад. Засим позвольте мне не тратить больше попусту свое время.
rosja (2016-08-31 21:28:52+00:00): Спасибо за ответ! Убедили )
literan (2016-08-31 21:31:53+00:00): Вы если надумаете какие-то серьезные, глобальные правки совершать, лучше напишите, я подскажу, посоветую чего :-)
rosja (2016-08-31 21:39:01+00:00): Я еще исправил на автомагистраль платный Северный объезд Одинцово М-1. Там вроде 100%-ая автомагистраль!?
literan (2016-08-31 21:43:04+00:00): нет! там тоже слишком крутые повороты. Автомагистралей у нас в России пао пальцам пересчитать, и они все давно обозначены. Неужто вы думаете, что до этого руки не дошли?))
rosja (2016-08-31 21:50:36+00:00): Ну мало ли))) Сайт-то "народный"))) Странно, а ведь на других ресурсах обозначена как автомагистраль?(( Да вроде  знак там зеленый есть?.. Спасибо за ответы!)
literan (2016-09-01 07:17:21+00:00): нет там зеленых знаков. Там знак "Дорога для автомобилей". Другие ресурсы, значит, менее точны, чем OSM
SomeoneElse (2016-09-24 12:46:46+00:00): There's still a real problem with the way that you are importing this data.  To take just one example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440033477 should clearly join adjacent features, yet you have just uploaded it without any editing or review.
The poor-quality way that you are approaching this data reflects very badly on ENSG.
Please take the time to talk to other mappers who have tried to help you with this process.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
(traduction automatique)
Il y a encore un vrai problème avec la façon que vous importez ces données. Pour ne prendre qu'un exemple http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440033477 devrait clairement rejoindre caractéristiques adjacentes, mais vous venez de télécharger sans aucune modification ou révision.
La façon de mauvaise qualité que vous faites cela reflète très mal sur ENSG.
S'il vous plaît prendre le temps de parler à d'autres cartographes qui ont essayé de vous aider dans ce processus.
Meilleures salutations,
Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail des données de l'OSM.
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:39:52+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440025026,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027573,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027593,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027617,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027622,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027680,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027737,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027870,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440028604,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440028782,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440028813,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440028839,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440029702,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440030354,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440030636,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440031906,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440033150
have no tags. What are they?
nammala (2016-09-01 05:25:41+00:00): Hi Сергей Полянский,

May I know the reason behind deleting `landuse=residential` tags.

cheers,
krishna
Hjart (2016-08-31 19:49:08+00:00): Hvis dette er *Rokkestenen*, hvad er så https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rokkestenen (bemærk placeringen)?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2016-09-01 21:46:37+00:00): Det her er rokkestenen i Almindingen.
Den på wikipedia er rokkestenen i Paradisbakkerne.

http://bornholm.info/da/rokkesten
Supaplex (2016-09-02 04:59:48+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Øukasz (2016-09-01 10:52:21+00:00): there's a duplicate name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Akaika#map=16/30.9084/46.4703
gileri (2016-08-31 19:53:12+00:00): Bonjour,

Il semble que tu as créé dans ce changeset 2 noeuds isolés :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4377461592
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4377463204
5m4u9 (2016-09-04 07:26:33+00:00): sergeomin is a goverment office not shop
Ranger444 (2016-09-06 15:26:59+00:00): please change for me thank you
alphensebezorger (2016-09-06 20:56:25+00:00): Hallo Remmel, 
Dankzij deze wijziging staat "De Baronie 302" nu twee keer op openstreetmap, en is nr 137 van de kaart verwijderd. Hier is de originele Baronie te vinden: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2785131927. Het lijkt me dat dit niet de bedoeling was. Kun je het zelf weer terugdraaien? Laat maar weten als ik het voor je moet doen. Je kunt reageren in het vak onder deze tekst op de website van openstreetmap: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41828317.
Groeten, Alphensebezorger.
alphensebezorger (2016-09-07 18:50:02+00:00): Wijzigingenset teruggedraaid na verzoek van Remmel via PM. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41986537
Øukasz (2016-09-01 11:17:45+00:00): please verify if it's qadha or nahya
Supaplex (2016-09-02 04:59:20+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
muralito (2016-09-01 02:18:44+00:00): Mauricio, no se que quisiste agregar, pero el el medio de las pistas no hay una agencia de viajes.
scai (2016-08-31 17:43:48+00:00): Please use proper changeset comments. "added info" isn't very useful.
GoWestTravel (2016-08-31 17:48:59+00:00): I'm sorry, I should have said that I added the address and website of this market. I promise to do better next time and use more descriptive comments.
Sanniu (2017-06-28 07:15:55+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392519989 - is it roundabout?
Alecs01 (2016-09-02 16:52:37+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, I changed back the german name of this place from Anratterhütte to Anrater. To my limited german knowledge, this looks more like the name of an alpine hut http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Alpine_hut . You may want to add it as a separate node.
Geography Canada (2016-08-31 15:58:45+00:00): Oops, I wasn't finished. I pressed enter by accident..
Hjart (2016-08-31 17:44:38+00:00): Please note that copying Google Maps is not allowed
Discordia2411 (2016-08-31 17:47:05+00:00): ok but i had my holydays there and the street is missing
Владимир К (2016-09-01 10:33:49+00:00): школа обозначена, удаляю
Stereo (2016-08-31 19:53:27+00:00): Tu essaies pas JOSM? :)
SHARCRASH (2016-08-31 20:02:01+00:00): Je suis passé par là aujourd'hui, j'enregistre mes observations vite fait avant que je n'oublie. :) JOSM je le laisse pour des edits où je pourrai prendre mon temps à chercher les bonnes fonctions, options, listes, etc... pour editer.
Regina Phalange (2016-09-05 06:58:28+00:00): Posso chiederti dove hai preso i nomi dei due edifici di chimica UNIMORE? Io ho queste fonti:

http://www.def-patrimonio.unimore.it/site/home/settore-immobili/campus-universitario-mo---via-campi/mo-16---chimica-e-farmacia/articolo110011558.html

http://www.def-patrimonio.unimore.it/site/home/settore-immobili/campus-universitario-mo---via-campi/mo-51---nuova-chimica/articolo110033468.html
LvdT (2016-09-05 18:51:34+00:00): Mi risultano essere i nomi "correnti", anche gli altri dipartimenti erano indicati con la dicitura "dipartimento di" prima della mia modifica.

Sicuramente i codici che si trovano nella fonte che hai indicato possono essere inseriti come ref, provvederò a farlo, anche
LvdT (2016-09-05 18:52:52+00:00): *anche se richiederà la suddivisione di scienze naturali in due sotto-edifici. Se riesco passo in loco a verificare come fare la divisione al meglio.
LLlypuk82 (2016-09-01 07:33:15+00:00): Прошу обратить внимание, что редактирование данных openstreetmap  является публичным достоянием, а не личными заметками.
Внесённые вами правки были удалены по указанной причине.
user_870861 (2016-09-04 12:46:28+00:00): hi,
i've fixed duplicated buildings in this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41906937
zstadler (2016-09-04 16:57:14+00:00): Hello Aharon,

Thanks for updating the OSM map.

The OSM name tag is expected to be in the name used locally.

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization

Thanks,
Zeev
user_5359 (2016-09-04 08:41:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t append a translation not at the name, use the language postfix (like name:ko).
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-31 17:48:10+00:00): OK, I'm afraid just removing the copyright doesn't change the questionability of your source.  Can you address that?
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-31 17:48:59+00:00): Sorry about that, I see you responded on the other changeset.
GoWestTravel (2016-08-31 17:52:05+00:00): I'm working in the travel industry and use data of the hotel chains itself.
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-31 17:56:05+00:00): Aah, OK, that makes a lot more sense.  Thanks for the clarification.
GoWestTravel (2016-08-31 17:57:27+00:00): You're welcome Paul. Thank you for noticing my error.
richlv (2016-09-01 08:19:28+00:00): is cafe "Olmāra" closed and renamed to "Pumpuri", or is "Olmāra" now located somewhere else ?
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:02:32+00:00): This is in Bolivia
geodreieck4711 (2016-09-27 21:09:22+00:00): relation wurde zerstört: Tags gelöscht....
pbnoxious (2018-01-22 18:31:57+00:00): Was soll das überhaupt für eine Route sein? Die mit FO gekennzeichneten Routen in dieser Ecke sind eigentlich schon alle vorhanden (der östliche Teil als FO5 / FO6, der Teil bei Adlitz könnte eine Änderung der FO4 sein). Vgl auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lokale_Fahrradrouten_im_Landkreis_Forchheim
Würde fast vermuten, dass diese Relation ein duplikat ist und nicht mehr benötigt wird.
Kengaru (2017-02-24 14:03:18+00:00): какое название верное?
name 	Солнечный берег
name:ru 	арт-отель "Азор"
Alecs01 (2016-09-04 18:51:04+00:00): The escalator is already on the map, please do not add ficticious "attractions", thanks
Goffredo (2016-09-01 17:31:08+00:00): Ciao! Scusa se ti contatto ancora, non voglio essere pedante ma vede che mappi da poco... Quando inserisci i numeri di telefono, cerca di seguire questo formato: +39 xxx xxxxxx
così che siano uniformati in tutta Italia.
Grazie e buon lavoro :-)
user_2275929 (2016-09-01 18:38:34+00:00): ok, corretto
Josef73 (2021-05-12 04:39:26+00:00): Guten Tag, hat die Weinburg 24/7 geöffnet? 
Weinburg (299031963, v3)
Noen (2016-08-31 22:43:10+00:00): This changeset breaks multiple ferry route relations, especially those representing summer service. 
I can't see the need for splitting parallell services into parallell ways, when this information already exist in route relations.
Achoin (2016-08-31 23:19:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. 
Вы внесли исправления в карту openstreetmap с помощью приложения MAPS.ME. 
Карта openstreetmap является общедоступной, и все правки, которые вы делаете через пункт меню "Добавить на карту" видны другим пользователям. Для личных правок используйте долгое нажатие на место и звездочку "метка". Метки хранятся только в вашем устройстве. Читайте инструкцию. (Настройки-Помощь-Метки). Ваши правки "Ханин РПГЗ"  "Дом" "Работа" "Обед" удалил. У вас они останутся до обновления карты.
anderfo (2019-09-04 09:49:04+00:00): Jeg forstår noe av dette (prøver selv å la navnet ligge på mtb:name hvis det kun brukes av stisyklister), men det var bl.a. stier med navnet "Skogstien" som også er skiltet i terrenget og som er et navn som nok er minst like mye brukt av turgåere som av syklister. Jeg forstår ikke helt hvorfor dette navnet absolutt måtte flyttes til mtb:name...
Jeg har sørget for at dette navnet står i en relasjon, men siden det også er synlig på skilt synes jeg deler av stien (der den ikke går i skiløypa) gjerne kan ha navnet på "name".
gunnar22 (2019-09-04 14:44:22+00:00): Jeg er enig! Jeg husker ikke helt (3 år siden?), men hvis det var slik at "Skogstien" ble flyttet (av meg?), så var det en feil. Så da bør den flyttes tilbake.
Hjart (2016-08-31 21:35:53+00:00): Har du brugt Bing ved justeringen af kystlinien? Jeg kan se det du har lavet ikke helt stemmer med Geodatastyrelsens fotos, som jeg tidligere har justeret den efter.
Ernst Poulsen (2016-08-31 22:15:45+00:00): Har brugt en blanding af forskellige baggrunde (for bla at se stier i skove) så ved ikke præcist hvilke kyststrækningerne er justeret efter. 

Hovedparten af kystjusteringerne har handlet om at tilføje flere detaljer, men der har også været delstrækninger, hvor jeg har justeret kystlinjen en anelse i østlig retning.

Kan du nævne et konkret sted, hvor det har givet problemer, så jeg kan gen-tjekke.
Hjart (2016-09-01 07:23:13+00:00): Der er blandt andet tale om http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.04932/10.91969. Bemærk at jeg så sent som i maj justerede stort set hele strækningen efter Geodatastyrelsens fotos og i tråd med anbefalingen i https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline
Achoin (2016-08-31 23:45:53+00:00): Общежитие занимает только пятый этаж или все здание? Если всё здание, тогда необходимо удалить точку "общежитие" Если только пятый этаж, тогда необходимо удалить "Общежитие" в name здания. Иначе POI дублируется
AgusQui (2016-09-05 01:17:04+00:00): ¿Usted esta consciente que esta agregando datos a un mapa que se usa en muchas aplicaciones?
Por favor agregue datos con responsabilidad, si quiere agregar un punto favorito hágalo dentro de la aplicación sin subir datos al mapa, si realmente aquí hay una parada, coloque el verdadero nombre e indique que lineas paran.
Si quiere ayuda puede contactarse conmigo o con el resto de la comunidad de Openstreetmap.
maro21 (2018-03-17 16:33:37+00:00): Na ulicy ta skrzynka stoi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4377876389
muralito (2016-08-31 21:21:26+00:00): Dani, no es conveniente publicar datos personales an bases de datos pubilcas.
Tomas Straupis (2016-09-02 07:36:12+00:00): Miškus Lietuvoje žymime landuse=forest.
natural=wood yra tik maži medžių plotai virš landuse=residential|commercial|industrial.
tordans (2019-02-02 07:55:21+00:00): @SupapleX noch eine Frage aufgrund von KeepRight-Meldungen:

Die Innenhöfe sind alle nicht mit dem Straßennetz verbunden. Siehst du einen sinnvollen weg, die Haupteingänge der Gebäude unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440083420 mit dem Innenhof Netz zu verbinden als Footway+Building Passage? Für mich spricht erstmal nichts dagegen. Ich würde dann die Wege alle als Private markieren.

Wenn Du zustimmst, mache ich das bei Gelegenheit für die Innenhöfe am Rollberg.
Supaplex030 (2019-02-02 12:03:11+00:00): Soweit ich weiß sind die Innenhöfe leider nur in Ausnahmen (wie Kopfstraße 15) mit den Haupteingängen verbunden. Die Innenhöfe sind auch hier meist nicht mehr erreichbar, nur für die Leute im Erdgeschoss und aus ein paar sozialen Einrichtungen heraus. Soweit ich weiß auch nicht aus den Gebäudeaufgängen heraus.
Allerdings gibt es ja noch die (verschlossenen) Feuerwehrzufahrten, die den öffentlichen Raum mit den Innenhofwegen verbinden - müssten Fehlermeldungen dadurch nicht verhindert werden? Bei einem der Ringbauten hab ich die Feuerwehrzufahrt noch vergessen zu mappen bzw. bin beim systematischen "durchkartieren" auf 360-Grad-Fotobasis aus dem letzten Frühjahr noch nicht bis dorthin gekommen...
tordans (2019-02-09 16:28:20+00:00): Ich war heute nochmal da und habe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67053295 aktualisiert. Fotos kommen in den nächsten Stunden in Mapillary an. 

Nebenbei: Die Überwachungskameras von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67053128 habe ich auch mal eingetragen. Das Tagging-Schema scheint aber noch etwas unvollständig, glaube ich. Die Kameras dürften trotzdem bald in https://kamba4.crux.uberspace.de/?lat=52.47424994&lon=13.44576807&zoom=18 auftauchen.
maraf24 (2016-09-04 07:29:00+00:00): Proszę podać link do informacji, że droga jest budowie.
5m4u9 (2016-09-01 05:36:00+00:00): why delete layer=1 on bridge? layer = 1 only describes what element is above another element. Please, restore.
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 15:16:50+00:00): according to the wiki a layer=1 tag is only needed when one bridge is on top of another. Here is the link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
5m4u9 (2016-09-01 15:47:46+00:00): also when the bridge passes over rivers, layer=1 only represent vertical alignment and not depth.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge#Layers
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:35:42+00:00): that is a valid point. i must have misunderstood. my apologies
5m4u9 (2016-09-01 18:01:11+00:00): thanks for your edits... one question more? this edits are part of a project, random edits, or tourism?
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 18:29:29+00:00): our company travels around the world updating maps so tourists and locals will have the most up to date map.
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:05:41+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:06:00+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Constable (2016-09-01 10:20:00+00:00): Ciao, posso chiederti cosa significa il tag "operator=412" cha hai aggiunto alla fermata Prenestina/Gattamelata? Credo proprio che il valore corretto dovrebbe essere ATAC; 412 è la linea che ci ferma?
grazie
Alecs01 (2016-09-02 18:17:07+00:00): Stando ad OSM (di cui mi fido :) la linea 412 passa proprio da lì https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1927156 non è la prima volta che vedo modifiche del genere, credo che maps.me tra i tanti difetti che ha non digerisce il tag operator, ho fatto il revert
Constable (2016-09-03 09:40:22+00:00): bene così.
grazie
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:05:25+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Troon (2016-09-02 06:07:41+00:00): It's "Lichfield". Litchfield's in Hampshire.
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:05:09+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:04:48+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:04:26+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Øukasz (2016-09-01 11:30:53+00:00): there's another Al Khalis point, looks more like the center location to me...
user_5359 (2016-09-01 19:17:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
GinaroZ (2016-08-31 22:22:34+00:00): Hi, noticed you removed the ref=A199 from the roundabout - what's the reason for doing that? And are you planning on doing it for all the other roundabouts as well?
Mike Baggaley (2016-08-31 23:20:11+00:00): Hi, the main change was to separate roads so that each road joins at a separate node, which I am aiming to do on a lot of roundabouts. Roundabouts are junctions between different roads and are not strictly part of any of the adjoining roads, and hence shouldn't have the ref of an adjoining road (there are a few that could be considered part of the road, mainly with motorways going round them). Only planning to remove refs from roundabouts where I am already doing something else to them and notice they have the ref of an adjoining road.
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:04:02+00:00): This is in Bolivia