piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DaveF (2022-03-15 17:04:03+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM
The name tag is for specific assigned names not a generic description such as 'Bunker' or 'Hole 9'
bunkers should be tagged with 'surface=sand' instead of 'natural'. It's an error in iD editor.
Podcast2010 (2022-03-15 17:20:48+00:00): Thanks Dave, new to this OSM, but using OSM + LIDAR date to generate Oaksey in TGC2019 so I can use on my Skytrak = Garage Golf!
gscholz (2022-03-15 05:35:18+00:00): Hi,
this changeset has created an error in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.48626&lat=-0.19376&zoom=17&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118475705

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-03-17 05:31:34+00:00): Hi Naomi Janowitzer,
to solve this issue I have reverted your changeset now.
Guido
Marek-M (2022-03-15 09:32:22+00:00): Cześć, tutaj było naniesione miejsce do jazdy konnej (leisure=pitch) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181712373 - czy jego już tam nie ma?
user_5359 (2022-03-14 17:52:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please.
SekeRob (2022-03-14 21:34:18+00:00): Hi

What is this 'broken' multipolygon supposed to respresent with only access=no tag and the rendering of the wood having disappeared?. Was it meant to be natural=wood + access=no?

cheers
catdreamer (2022-03-15 12:25:42+00:00): 山頂natural=peak
舊稱old_name=
name規則請參閱
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
MxxCon (2022-03-15 07:18:05+00:00): Hello.
What is the purpose of ways 1040250054 and 1040250055? You didn't add any tags to them...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118476646
Puntertje (2022-03-15 15:57:24+00:00): Hey, I used these lines for a multipolygon relation for the wall-like shape of the building part. I'm not sure how to tag them individually, if you have any suggestions feel free to mention them.
Regards, Puntertje
A67-A67 (2022-08-05 13:52:17+00:00): Ik heb de correcte tag voor fietsstrook hersteld. Dit is cycleway=lane, niet cycleway=track.

De tag cycleway=track geeft een fietspad aan. Deze tag is in Nederland zelden nodig, omdat ze aparte fietspaden los intekenen.
Cristoffs (2022-11-15 09:58:53+00:00): Proszę nie sklejaj landuse z drogami, super dokładnie mapujesz, ale jakakolwiek korekta wymaga zniszczenia częściowo Twojej pracy
eggie (2022-03-14 16:55:49+00:00): Dag Aronyx
construction=unclassified hoort de tag highway=construction
De tagging is niet consistent.
Wegen die verwijderd zijn kun je ook daadwerkelijk verwijderen. 

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118477238

MVG
eggie
BCNorwich (2022-03-15 08:04:12+00:00): Hi There were quite a few crossing highways (paths), some crossing buildings, some joined to areas and buildings and one long duplicated section. I think I've corrected all the problems but could you please check before uploading more.

Thanks, Regards Bernard.
kapazao (2022-03-15 13:49:02+00:00): Hi, you did make some mistakes in this changeset.

Please use protocol in websites.
In the shop Worten you changed the website and removed the phone, but you did not change more information and that is incorrect. Please complete the edition.
What is the problem with Deichmann website? why did you remove it?
It would be good if you read OSM wiki if you are not sure about how to edit.

Thank you for your contributions. Regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118477417
ixybus (2022-03-15 14:02:32+00:00): Hi:
Deichmann is no longer there, that's why I tried deleting it.
Also tried editing worten as that shop is no longer there too, there's another kind of shop.

I'll look for more documentation on how to edit/delete store just to be sure

By the way I'm spanish and I don't really know if, when editing/adding POI, I should add it in spanish only, english only, or both.
kapazao (2022-03-16 12:44:42+00:00): Hi, you should use local language as the first language and you can add extra languages using some tags as name:en, etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Language-specific_Names

Regards
eggie (2022-03-14 18:08:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Ltrlg (2022-03-14 16:55:29+00:00): source = Ortho HR IGN
Truchin (2022-03-28 08:10:36+00:00): Bonjour Jorisbo,

Il n'y a presque pas de giratoire (roundabout) à Paris. En l'occurrence, c'est un rond-point donc c'était bien tagué avant ton intervention.

Bonne continuation.

Thomas
Jorisbo (2022-03-28 16:04:12+00:00): Hallo Thomas, what would then be wrong with a mini_roundabout? highway=mini_cirucular would be the very first in the world of osm. Possible of course, but unlikely that this is needed. See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=mini_roundabout
kind regards, Joris
Truchin (2022-03-28 20:08:20+00:00): Ce qui change entre un rond-point et un giratoire, ce sont les règles de priorité. Un giratoire (roundabout) correspond à une priorité au véhicule circulant sur l'anneau. Alors que pour un rond-point, c'est en général une gestion par feu tricolore ou/et priorité à droite.
Il n'existe que 2/3 giratoires dans Paris : place de Catalogne et place de la porte de Saint-Cloud + porte de Boulogne (à cheval sur Boulogne et Paris).

Thomas
loupy23 (2022-03-14 17:07:58+00:00): First Tree
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
hoserab (2022-03-14 18:11:03+00:00): Hi Binzy_Boi,

Unmarked crosswalks exist at the corners of every intersection in the province of Alberta, unless noted otherwise by signage or other markings. The Use of Highway and Rules of the Road Regulation (AB Reg 304/2002) defines a crosswalk as "that part of a roadway at an intersection included within the connection of the lateral line of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway measured from the curbs or, in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the roadway". As such, even at tee intersections like 7th St & 16th Ave SW, there are unmarked crossings.

I have re-added the crossings you deleted (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118480493). Please be careful about deleting unmarked crossings.

Thanks
hoserab (2022-03-14 18:18:41+00:00): Just wanted to add, 16th Ave @ 8th St SW is actually a really good example of where unmarked crossings across 8th Street do NOT exist, because there is signage specifically disallowing pedestrians to cross there.
user_15304597 (2022-03-18 09:37:28+00:00): Hi hoserab,

Thanks for making me aware of this, I appreciate the criticism, and will review the given references.
eggie (2022-03-14 18:15:15+00:00): Bijna altijd is oneway=yes uitgezonderd van tweewielers . Dat is hier ook het geval. Dan bijtaggen 
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:moped=no
oneway:mofa=no

MVG
eggie
user_12500175 (2022-03-14 17:37:05+00:00): Hallo, wenn du als Hintergund anstatt der "Bavariakarte" das "Bing Maps Luftbild "nimmst ist die Garage gut zu erkennen, die Karte ist auch (bei uns) schärfer
eggie (2022-03-14 18:18:25+00:00): Idem....  
De uitzonderingen voor tweewielers toevoegen svp.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-14 18:25:46+00:00): De uitzonderingen voor tweewielers heb ik toegevoegd.
Graag even checken of het klopt.
MVG
eggie
ALu68 (2022-03-14 21:13:45+00:00): note = "Weder zu verkaufen noch zu vermieten"
Das ist aber keine sinnvolle Notiz für Mapper.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-21 16:53:41+00:00): Thank you for fixing it!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118478673
Jorisbo (2022-03-21 17:20:22+00:00): Hi Dimitar, no problem at all, thank you for your contribution! kind regards Joris
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-17 00:28:45+00:00): edição revertida tambem, se a via é instransitavel em algum trecho, aquele trecho deve ser separado do resto da via e neste trecho serem adicionados as caracteristicas devidas e jamais deletar.
LordGarySugar (2022-03-14 20:50:16+00:00): Is this really the housname of this building? Private information such as names should not be added to OpenStreetMap.
LordGarySugar (2022-03-14 20:39:41+00:00): Hi, the correct way to change the grass to a kerb would have been to remove landuse=grass and add barrier=kerb. I have updated this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118485302.
tsp15 (2022-03-15 16:27:22+00:00): Pasy na jezdni to "cycleway=lane", wcześniej było poprawnie.
ALu68 (2022-03-14 21:32:08+00:00): Baugrundstück: Tunnelstr. 94 - 94 b // siehe Seite 91: https://www.augsburg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/footer/amtsblatt/2020/Amtsblatt-2020-9-10.pdf
Kovoschiz (2022-03-18 16:22:37+00:00): Please don't spam `place=suburb`.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-10 13:59:39+00:00): 2. Can you please don't add duplicate features, mix up everywhere, and add non-existent features by misunderstanding the names. Please discuss if you don't know what are you doing. https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte
Kovoschiz (2022-04-10 14:01:47+00:00): 3. Consider moving historical names to OpenHistoricalName (but you still need to interpret maps correctly, not make a mess of everything randomly)
Kovoschiz (2022-04-10 14:05:12+00:00): 4. Please don't add `amenity=grave_yard` and `natural=shrub`, or abuse other areas. Just use `place=locality` if you understand.
AndyB_66 (2022-03-14 21:33:58+00:00): Pozostawiłeś niespójne znaczniki - popraw to.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-23 17:35:01+00:00): Please don't outline areas with fake cartpaths
AndyB_66 (2022-03-14 21:26:56+00:00): Nie zostawiaj tagu "construction" dla dróg oddanych do użytku.
AndyB_66 (2022-03-15 11:39:05+00:00): ... i opisuj bardziej precyzyjnie i szczegółowo swoje "edycje", proszę.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-23 17:36:13+00:00): Please don't avoid adding bridges
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
Tjuro_Global (2022-03-15 19:15:50+00:00): Hello jdcarls2,

I see you added landuse=shrubbery to some greenery, should this maybe be natural=shrubbery instead?

Regards,
ManualTagFixer
jcarlson (2022-03-15 19:23:34+00:00): D'oh! You're absolutely right, it should have been. The correct tag slipped my mind at the time. I have fixed these. Thanks!
Tjuro_Global (2022-03-15 19:24:39+00:00): From the air these areas look quite sparse so a shrubbery:density=sparse tag could be added if you want.
jcarlson (2022-03-15 19:41:33+00:00): Done! From recent imagery I'd call a few of them medium, but the rest sparse.
user_5359 (2022-03-15 13:37:36+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieht Dir den Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26271896 nochmal an. Was ist die Bedeutung von dem Tag Eschenweg = Holunderweg?
Ropino (2022-03-15 14:27:38+00:00): Ist korrigiert.
bxl-forever (2022-03-14 21:05:39+00:00): Hello,
I am not sure entrance #2 of the station is wheelchair-friendly.  This one has only stairs and escalators; wheelmap users requested such situations to be treated as wheelchair=no.
Did something change here recently?

Proper access for people in wheelchairs is entrance #3, several meters east of this point.
meduz' (2022-03-23 17:43:42+00:00): You’re right! Entrance 1 and 2 are not wheelchair friendly. They only have stairs and escalator.

Entrance 3 and 5 have stairs, escalators and elevators (it seems  the elevators are at the proper place on the map).
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-23 17:31:21+00:00): Please don't add fake buildings
Firefishy (2022-03-15 07:56:07+00:00): Awesome first edit! Thank you for your local knowledge. Happy mapping.
vogelfreier (2022-09-14 15:34:10+00:00): bei dem Bahnhof Wildeswil hast Du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040325031 eine Zufahrt nach "swisstopo SWISSIMAGE" neu eingezeichnet, wo Ich aus der Ferne nur eine Schneise der Zerstörung an Gebäude und an Sporteinrichtungen sehe, für die Umgehungsstraße in Troglage.
"Bing-Luftbilder" zeigen mir Deine Bearbeitung
tux67 (2022-03-15 09:01:20+00:00): Hallo momo94,

ist "Luna-Park" ein offizieller name mit einem Schild vor Ort, oder mehr eine Lokale Bezeichnung?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118482153
momo94 (2022-03-16 09:37:54+00:00): Luna-Park ist nur eine lokale Bezeichnung.

Viele Grüße
tux67 (2022-03-16 09:48:54+00:00): das würde man dann mit loc_name mappen. name bitte wirklich nur verwenden wenn da ein Schild steht und das offiziell so heisst.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#loc_name
momo94 (2022-03-16 10:01:05+00:00): Ich kann das Objekt loc_name über den Browser nicht anwählen. Ich würde dann den Namen einfach wieder rausnehmen.
tux67 (2022-03-16 10:20:10+00:00): In iD kannst du jedes Schlüssel/Wert Paar auch manuell anlegen. Einfach bei "Eigenschaften" mit + einen neuen Eintrag generieren und loc_name in die erste Spalte.
momo94 (2022-03-16 10:46:39+00:00): Achso, ok, vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
user_5359 (2022-03-15 15:14:42+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/889545058. What is the meaning of the tags:
co_insee_com=79219
co_postal=79210
lb_com=PRIAIRES
lb_voie_ext=ROUTE DU MARAIS
va_no_voie=2
user_5359 (2022-03-15 15:15:20+00:00): This node is only one example og six nodes with the same keys.
tux67 (2022-03-15 08:59:23+00:00): Hallo momo94, 

Die Hausnummer 5 war bereits als Node neben 1 und 3 eingetragen. Am Trommlerkops POI ist eine weitere Adresse ok, nicht aber das Duplikat am Gebäude. Wenn die 5 als Node zur Zeit an der falschen Stelle ist und die Hausnummer vor Ort an anderer Stelle angebracht ist, dann verschiebe bitte den Node.
Danke und Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118482880
momo94 (2022-03-16 09:40:15+00:00): Hallo,
Ok, ich verschiebe den Node. Prinzipiell ist der Trommlerkorps nur ein Teil. Das ganze Gebäude hat die Hausnummer 5. Ich passe das entsprechend an.

Viele Grüße!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-16 02:35:58+00:00): Why are the fields tagged as water?
tux67 (2022-03-15 09:05:27+00:00): Ist Ohlenforst beides? Hotel und restaurant? Dann wären ggf. 2 nodes sinnvoll. 
Jetzt deutet der Name auf nur ein Restaurant hin, während es um wesentlichen als tourism=hotel getaggt ist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118482973
momo94 (2022-03-16 09:36:56+00:00): Da wo aktuell der Tag ist, ist das Restaurant. Es gibt auch noch einen Hotelteil, der sich gegenüber (Kreuzstr. 5) befindet. Das heißt aber, glaube ich, anders, weshalb ich da vorerst keinen neuen Tag machen würde.
tux67 (2022-03-16 09:46:53+00:00): Ok, nur so als option .. hier haben wir eine ähnliche Konstellation und einen Weg das zu mappen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208033977
momo94 (2022-03-16 09:56:36+00:00): Ok, ja so könnte man es machen. Ich informier mich mal, wie der Hotelbereich genau heißt und trage das ein.
tux67 (2022-03-17 07:30:40+00:00): Kann jetzt das tourism=hotel von diesem Node runter:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2889005396 ? 
Zurzeit hat der Node mit amenity=restaurant und tourism=hotel 2 konkurrierende Haupt-Tags.
momo94 (2022-03-17 13:09:35+00:00): Ok, hab den Hotel Tag entfernt und dabei direkt den neuen Besitzer eingetragen ;) Danke für den Hinweis!
tux67 (2022-03-17 13:36:23+00:00): 👍👍👍Prima ..
Glassman (2022-03-16 18:58:50+00:00): #TIP: You can actually draw in the island as someone has  done for you. Check out https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118483495#map=19/48.95807/-122.72741
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118483495
user_5359 (2022-03-15 14:47:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9579053002. What is the meaning of the tag moty = 34?
dcapillae (2022-03-15 15:09:36+00:00): Hi,

Probably a "copy-paste" error (my mistake, sorry). Fixed! 

Thank you for your collaboration.

Regards,

Daniel
user_5359 (2022-03-15 13:49:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040341399. What ist the meaning of the tag landusend = cons?
richlv (2022-03-15 17:38:39+00:00): Haha, when my computer is slowish, I get all kinds of weird content in dialogs. Usually I spot it before uploading, but missed this time.
Thank you for noticing, fixed now.
Scout Jens (2024-10-30 09:27:42+00:00): Hallo

Der Übergang passt nicht für mich. Es gibt dort nur eine Fußgängerampel. Die beiden zusätzlich auf der Straße von Dir eingetragenen haben keine zusätzliche Funktion. 

Viele Grüße, Jens
Schröcker (2024-11-04 17:19:09+00:00): Hallo Jens,
ich habe das vor Ort nur nebenbei gemappt und mich an dem deutschen Hilfetext orientiert: "In der Nähe kann auf einem weiteren Punkt eine Ampel (highway=traffic_signals) für den Straßenverkehr eingetragen werden." Das kann m.e. Sinn machen (wie z.B. beim Stop-Schild) um den Ort festzuhalten (Haltelinie). Ja, das geht schon etwas in Richtung "Mikromapping" und müsste konsequent auch für die Fußgänger-(Ampel) gelten. Die Ampeln müsste man dann noch in einer Relation zusammenfassen, denn es steckt ja nur eine Ampelsteuerung dahinter. Du solltest das Ganze mal in einem Forum diskutieren, ob das Sinn macht. Ich denke dabei z.B. an autonomes Fahren. Gruß! Hugo
Schröcker (2024-11-04 18:09:08+00:00): Wenn man auf den englischen Hilfeseiten weitersucht, findet man auch die Möglichkeit die einzelnen Ampeln für Fußgänger zu mappen.
Traffic signals for pedestrians: ....where to stop or where the button is located...
Scout Jens (2024-11-06 14:19:02+00:00): Servus, Hugo,
ich danke für die schnelle und umfassende Antwort. Mir war nur wichtig, dass diese Einträge irgendwie passen. Das ist wohl der Fall. Ansonsten nutze ich die Daten zum Wandern. Da sind mir Ampeln eher "wurst". Fröhliches Mappen weiterhin und viele Grüße, Jens
felipeeugenio (2022-03-28 20:28:06+00:00): Hola
La calle ejército está en reparaciones. No se puede bajar tengo entendido. En Mapillary suby una subida que hice por ahi el fin de semana.
jackripper1 (2022-03-28 20:54:45+00:00): Hola Felipe. Pasé hace unas semanas y creo recordar que la bajada hasta Elsa Martin estaba cortada. También hay una escalera nueva que conecta Elsa Martin con Bombero Barría, pero creo que es provisional.
aceman444 (2022-03-15 19:19:25+00:00): Hi, why do you introduce wrong data? If you bothered to check the history of the road, you would see I changed it no oneway=no based on survey. Also you claim you used Maxar imagery, where it is seen the road got added the opposite lane (compared to older imagery) to allow both ways traffic. So what are you trying to do?

Are your other mass changes of similar "quality" ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
rmikke (2022-04-08 10:28:15+00:00): Hej :)

Udało Ci się aż trzem aptekom nadać ten sam ref:csioz:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6385827121
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1812858587
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2558588316
Cristoffs (2022-04-09 10:10:49+00:00): Szlag. Dobrze że mnie pilnujesz. Zaraz poprawię.
Cristoffs (2022-04-09 10:16:33+00:00): Poprawiłem. Jak skończymy z tymi aptekami. Odpytam OT i poszukam błędów oznaczenie w całej Polsce. Niewiele już zostało.
Bolt051 (2023-02-21 11:10:40+00:00): Hi WaWei!

I just encounter this Relation: 3993257 and it doesn't looks like a valid relation. I don't have the necesary info to adjust it. Maybe you have more info. Thank you!
WaWei (2023-03-03 16:11:47+00:00): Hello Bolt051,
ich habe die Relation 3993257 entfernt, da "kein Rechts abbiegen" sicher nicht korrekt ist. Kann mich noch erinnern, dass ich hier den Wegverlauf korrigiert habe,sollte ich die Relation eingefügt haben, war es nicht wissentlich und irrtümlich.
Ich hoffe, es ist jetzt OK.
Schöne Grüße
(Ich antworte dir auf Deutsch - mein Englisch ist leider nicht allzugut ;)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-16 02:46:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040349027 is drawn incorrectly and some of the parking nodes you added are on buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118485064
user_5359 (2022-03-15 13:23:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a special look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9579174542 (There is probably still a workhorse in the wild)
RaccoonFederation (2022-03-15 01:47:22+00:00): This appears to be incorrect
Biahxavier093 (2022-03-18 22:29:30+00:00): O problema é que o meu Instagram está dizendo que eu tô em Fortaleza mais na verdade eu tô em horizonte na rua Antônio Agostinho da Silva
Gustavo22Soares (2022-03-19 00:09:35+00:00): Olá Bia,
Pfvr, verifique se a localização do seu dispositivo está ativada e se o app do instagram está com permissão para usá-la.

Obrigado por utilizar o OpenStreetMap. 
O OpenStreetMap é uma plataforma feita por voluntários independente não temos como dar suporte a plataformas de terceiros.
Caso tenha alguma duvida de como adicionar ou corrigir um dado na plataforma estou aqui para lhe ajudar ;)
RaccoonFederation (2022-03-15 01:45:00+00:00): You seem to have selected the wrong option for both of these bus stops. Do you need help?
RaccoonFederation (2022-03-15 14:14:25+00:00): Reverted
nylisha (2022-03-15 17:37:56+00:00): Thank you. Could you please help me understand how you figured out it was a mistake? I thought I selected the correct option, but I'd like to go back and understand what went wrong.
RaccoonFederation (2022-03-16 01:44:26+00:00): Hi, I was using the web editor and I clicked on the mapillary image link and that shows me the mapillary image that you were looking at when you completed the mission 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=9002266152#map=20/50.41920/-4.12608
The image shows a bus shelter with a bench but the node details were changed to shelter=no , bench=no and so I can only assume that you clicked on the image that says "Pole only" instead of the image that says "Shelter, Bench" in Pic4Review.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-18 00:27:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614990 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some unlikely name changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118486417 .
SomeoneElse (2022-03-18 00:18:04+00:00): Hello punggoekjin,
"Pohang Marine Corpse Municipality Odojjasekihap Special Metropolitan City" sounds like a pretty unlikely name to me.  Please only use real names in OpenStreetMap.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-18 00:27:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614990 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some unlikely name changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118486417 .
JJIglesias (2022-03-15 08:20:53+00:00): Marcavi Grande (270) is in another different location, and that's correlated with data of the Census (INE) and also from the Education Department (Minedu) School Locations Inventary. This Marcavi (75) that you chance is also correlated with data from INE and MINEDU. I will change the data as it was originally, but not revert your changeset. Thanks