piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2018-12-08 14:42:29+00:00): Je hebt nu een node op de weg name=Er is geen doorgang meer mogelijk naar de Eikenlaan.Moerbijlaan gegeven. Dat is niet gebruikelijk.
Wat bedoel je met de weg is afgesloten. permanent of voor onderhoud. Staat hier soms en paaltje.. dan barrier=bollard. Ik haal je bijdrage even weg, want dit is niet conform taggingsafspraken binnen OSM.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2018-12-08 15:46:15+00:00): Aangepast met een stukje highway=pedestrian in overleg met mapper middels PB.
arcanma (2019-01-05 15:36:26+00:00): Claudio, ho corretto Via Ravenna, a cui avevi messo tunnel=yes e layer=-1. Probabilmente volevi metterlo solo al tratto sotto l'edificio vicino all'incrocio con Via Volturno, ma per una svista è andato sull'intera via. In casi come quello comunque è preferibile tunnel=building_passage, senza mettere alcun layer, vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel (la pagina in italiano non è aggiornata)
berndw (2018-12-10 16:56:50+00:00): Hallo

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Wenn das Unternehmen auch auffindbar sein soll, müssen noch  ein paar weitere Infos hinzugefügt werden

Ich würde dann den Punkt auch innerhalb eines Gebäudes positionieren und die Adressdaten nur an diesem Gebäude anbringen.

Laut der Website wäre vielleicht
office=consulting o.ä. angebracht

Etwas zum Thema, siehe Eintrag Büro

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
Weitere sinnvolle Einträge wären Kontaktdaten, Telefon und/oder Fax


Für weitere Fragen steh ich gerne zur Verfügung
aktikom (2018-12-12 13:32:50+00:00): Hallo BerndW,
Danke für den Hinweis. Bin ganz neu hier und versuche mich etwas einzuarbeiten.
Hintergrund ist eine gute Alternative von GoogleMaps zu haben, welche ich auch meinen Kunden empfehlen kann.
Alle meine "kleinen" Kunden sind aber auf der Karte nicht zu finden und ich wollte mal mit meinem Unternehmen anfangen. Für jeden Hinwein bin ich dankbar.
Ein verständliches Tutorial gibt es nicht zufällig wie man (ich) Unternehmen auf der Karte richtig eintragen kann... oder?
LG Peter (aktikom)
berndw (2018-12-12 13:54:24+00:00): Hallo Peter

Es gibt das OSM-Wiki, dass zumindest einen Einstieg bietet, Links siehe unten.
Ansonsten würde ich dieses PDF empfehlen.
https://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf

Bernd

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hilfe
mavl (2018-12-25 00:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
MKnight (2019-10-05 16:42:32+00:00): Wenn man bei sowas genauer hinschauen würde, könnte man feststellen, dass man sich in Jena befindet.
Ich entferne das jetzt wieder.
viloan (2018-12-08 14:28:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ndm (2018-12-08 15:34:13+00:00): Numbering looks a bit odd on Upton Road -- did you check it on foot?
Mad Bull (2018-12-09 02:34:54+00:00): Yep...Just made a mistake, thanks for letting me know.
eggie (2018-12-08 15:39:52+00:00): Tip: Je kunt dit combinatie layerbestand met oa "BGT omtrekgericht" eerst laden.. dan zie je precies de juiste ligging. Alles is ingemeten.
De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
eggie (2018-12-09 11:08:23+00:00): Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg
Nakaner (2024-09-08 07:57:12+00:00): Hi,

you added lots of German names in this changeset. What's the source of these names?

Best regards

Michael
robschumann (2024-09-15 14:28:26+00:00): source: old maps
skquinn (2019-01-28 06:11:34+00:00): The description looks too much like ad copy and/or content which does not belong in the OSM database.
Luzandro (2018-12-09 16:22:24+00:00): Hallo Benjamin,
neben dem Hinzufügen des Lokals hast du irgendwie auch das Gebäude gelöscht, oder genauer gesagt die Attribute davon, ich habe das wiederhergestellt
LG Andreas
Emirhan* (2018-12-08 20:01:52+00:00): not bursa, its bingol btw
L'imaginaire (2018-12-08 19:21:03+00:00): Goed dat je deze slagerij hebt teruggeplaatst. Ik heb de originele informatie ondertussen teruggezet, inclusief de tag shop=butcher, zodat het duidelijk is dat het over een slagerij gaat. De gebouwen errond zijn afgebroken, die heb ik verwijderd. Zie wijzigingenset 65298930
sperlingskauz (2018-12-08 17:30:11+00:00): The information under 'source' is from the previous changeset, correct is: Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta; Strava Heatmap.
shaikh solaiman (2019-08-20 16:03:11+00:00): Hi, Greetings! Here in this area you have drawn by using Bing imagery and there is no drought that might be river. but when you will look through Maxar Standard Imagery it seems there is no river or any waterways. It seems like highways. So, would you mind looking this place using Maxar Standard imagery. Thanks in advance.
Frans S (2019-08-20 17:23:05+00:00): Hi, Shaikh solaiman. 
Did you seen when this task has been mapped.?  9 month ago.
Maxar S did not exist on that time. It came available early july this year.
Feel free to adjust my mappings.
Best regards
btw. I do a lot of validating work on project 5741 (Tanzania)on which you mapped many tasks
Please be more precise in mapping buildings. Oversized. Mapped many square buildings as round huts. I did not bother you with that because the mappings took to long ago. So I corrected them where needed.
Best regard
Frans S (2019-08-20 17:56:57+00:00): Hello Shaikj solaiman
I checked this changeset with the Bing imagery and it certainly shows a river
Take a look here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-15.302455198445356/23.140516806777004
and open it with the Bing Imagery, Yes  Maxar shows dry ground, but Bing can be as old as over 10 years. 
Best regards
shaikh solaiman (2019-08-20 19:45:03+00:00): Thanks for your review! It was just said to inform you and  also to know whether you know the place better. Because before your mapping the area was marked as wetland, but you tagged a small portion as river inside a wetland instead of ditch or canal. Because Bing imagery says it cant be a river but you tagged. That's why I informed you to look at. But may be you took it as personally. However, in project 5741 imagery was esri, but may be you are validating with maxar, that's why it can be more clear than before. Finally, don't take it personally because I think that area should have been tagged as canal/ditch instead of river if you look through Bing Imagery. And I think my approach of informing was friendly and also yours. So, never mind.
Best regards
gurglypipe (2018-12-08 22:53:26+00:00): Hi, this shop appears to already exist in the building just to the north. Have they expanded, or is this a duplicate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65294984
MapperTwo (2018-12-09 08:02:07+00:00): Duplicate removed.
Truchin (2018-12-12 08:45:15+00:00): T'es sûr que c'est ouvert ? D'après mes informations, ce n'est pas le cas.
Florimondable (2018-12-12 12:58:07+00:00): C'est bien ouvert entre Buffat et Maroc, par contre après c'est une erreur d'édition.
Владимир К (2019-10-28 08:33:25+00:00): вы неправильно используете тег hw=traffic_signals
его не должно быть на переходах
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-09 08:48:44+00:00): Hi csmargar, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Furthermore, could you 'square' your mapped buildings? You can find a help page about how to do this here: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65295582
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
John_Harris (2019-01-21 16:45:54+00:00): You are vandalizing OSM. On-the-ground rule speaks about main name, not about other language names. What you do is a vandalism. English, Germans or Georgians do not call those settlements in accordance to separatists' guide. Sources prove that.
Jerry_W2k (2018-12-08 23:19:00+00:00): Hej, czemu zmieniasz drogi na ścieżki dla pieszych? I czemu cały czas zmieniasz nieużytki i lasy na parki?
Froscik (2018-12-09 22:01:14+00:00): Bo to są bardziej ścieżki niż drogi, samochodem tam nie można zbytnio przejechać, a przy stadionie to zdawało mi się że prędzej był park czyż nie?
maraf24 (2018-12-10 09:39:57+00:00): @Froscik: przy pomniku Matki Boskiej nie ma parku.
Park to nie jest jakaś zieleń. To jest funkcja rekreacyjno-wypoczynkowa terenu zielonego i jest to zawsze zieleń zarządzana, a nie jakaś nieużytek trawiasty.
Przy dworcu również nie ma parku. To zieleń separacyjna. 
Ta droga: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/576910268 to raczej powinna być ścieżka (path), a nie footway. Różnica jest istotna dla rowerzystów-bo footway jest traktowana jako droga tylko dla pieszych.
maraf24 (2018-12-10 09:51:57+00:00): Te drzewa przy stadionie to mogą być po prostu drzewa, ale mogą też funkcjonować jako nieformalny park. Trudno powiedzieć jak jest bez odwiedzin:)
Froscik (2018-12-11 22:34:03+00:00): To wtedy to przy stadionie może to funkcjonować jako nieformalny park, bo prędzej mi się zdawało, że tak właśnie było więc poprawiłem to, a to przy dworcu to takie miejsce wypoczynkowe, są ławeczki do posiedzenia, kilka drzew, dużo ludzi tutaj spaceruje, a odnoście tych ścieżek to są to takie ścieżki leśne można tam chodzić pieszo jak i rowerem :)
Yorvik Prestigitator (2018-12-09 05:29:56+00:00): Why have you made Jones Shoe shop look like it is open? It has been closed for nearly two years and has been used as a temprorary christmas shop by York Cancer Charity this year and last?
literan (2018-12-10 20:30:16+00:00): вносите очевидно фейковые кафе в лесу. Удалено.
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-09 08:48:36+00:00): Hi csmargar, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Furthermore, could you 'square' your mapped buildings? You can find a help page about how to do this here: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65296278
totera (2018-12-12 00:27:59+00:00): What is your source for the city sections of the route?
marcoSt (2018-12-12 18:31:08+00:00): My source is for example this : https://meinfernbus.de/en/staedte, https://meinfernbus.de/en/staedte/bus-ab-ancona#!timetable ect. You can find the links for all cities here: https://meinfernbus.de/en/staedte and the whole routes here: https://meinfernbus.de/en/unser-angebot/verbindungen.html.
I hope, i can help you.
totera (2018-12-14 00:25:08+00:00): Thanks, but in the site you can find just where the stops are.
What about the route between the stops?
marcoSt (2018-12-14 17:28:54+00:00): Here are two links about the routes: https://meinfernbus.de/en/download/map/simple and for the Nightlines https://meinfernbus.de/en/unser-angebot/nachtverbindungen. I'm not sure they are good sources. Else Intuition, Logical thinking, to think, which way is the most economical one ect. But no guarantee if it is the right way but nearly one mostly, I think :-)
totera (2018-12-14 22:21:20+00:00): So you only know the stops and you are just guessing the route for hundreds of kilometers in-between... and in particular you have no hint about the roads the bus runs along inside cities.
I don't think this is an acceptable mapping style.
marcoSt (2018-12-15 15:41:05+00:00): You have the same opinion like I am, that these coaches must drive over motorways and freeways. So far so good. The details, in which way the busses drive into the inner cities is not secure. That's right.

My routing for this long-term lines is only a suggestion, that anyone local mapper can improve in detail. That is for me lived community in OSM. 
That means, everbody is allowed to improve these lines. I even grateful that someone improve these lines.

Have you some details, that I don't know? If you know something, can you give it to this project, please?. I'm really looking forward for anybody detail knowlegde.
marcoSt (2018-12-15 16:17:44+00:00): Moreover it is for me a daily business to route buslines without knowledge about the position of every or some bus stations. I have many expierences about this. I  even improve the lines myself if I saw this way was not the right one. This knowlegde flows in this routing.
marcoSt (2018-12-15 17:35:09+00:00): In conclusion of all is it's the pioneer's stupid ;-)
dieterdreist (2021-12-01 15:50:31+00:00): Ciao Procuste,

ho notato che hai inserito intorno all'Auditorio 5 giardini tutti con il nome "Giardino Claudio Abbado". Possibile che nella realtà si tratta dello stesso giardino?

Ciao,
Martin
procuste (2021-12-04 15:57:05+00:00): Buon pomeriggio, Martin
sì, dovrebbe essere l'intero giardino intorno all'auditorium ad avere quel nome. Sinceramente non ricordo perché avessi optato per replicare il nome in ogni pezzetto di giardino, probabilmente non ero riuscito a creare un multipolygon o c'era stato qualche altro problema.
dieterdreist (2021-12-05 10:59:28+00:00): Buongiorno Procuste,
grazie per la risposta, allora lo modifico che risulta come un giardino unico.
Ciao,
Martin
ma-rt-in (2018-12-08 18:24:32+00:00): Hello,
what is the purpose of your change? What should the "lgbtq = primary" mean.
kartonage (2018-12-08 18:24:46+00:00): Hey rorym 🏳️‍🌈,

can you explain what the diffence between lgbtq=primary and 🏳️‍🌈=primary is?

Best regards
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-12-08 18:27:49+00:00): I have put some documentation for lgbtq tag here ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lgbtq ).

The 🏳️‍🌈=primary tag is for fun, since it can be more inclusive than "LGBTQ". Right now there is no difference, except that the OSM Wiki doesn't let you document a key like "🏳️‍🌈".
LeifRasmussen (2018-12-08 21:56:07+00:00): I think that emoji are more fun, but they can also break existing programs that are expecting plain text.
Carnildo (2018-12-09 03:40:13+00:00): Even Unicode-aware programs can fail to handle emoji correctly, since they're combining characters outside the Basic Multilingual Plane.  JOSM on Linux shows the tag as a black-and-white scribble, while viewing a dump of the changeset in a text editor shows the scribble plus a black-and-white flag.

For that matter, programs that handle emoji correctly can have problems.  I came across this changeset while trying to figure out why a bunch of stuff had been tagged as "[flag of the Netherlands]=primary".  I'm now reasonably sure it's supposed to be "[rainbow flag]=primary", but when the flag was shrunk for display, the color bands got merged to produce red-white-blue.
Nmxosm (2018-12-09 10:09:18+00:00): I can't see, why you should add redundant data. From computer science perspective it brings lots of issues along (especially consistency). What, if lgbtq=primary doesn't apply any more, a mapper removes that, but leaves [rainbow flag]=primary? Although for almost all of us OSM is a sparetime project / hobby, I think it is far from meaningless. Therefore we should handle such problems with care. There are enough inconsistencies in the database anywhere. Some other mappers seem to think this way too: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element#Tag_data

In a nutshell: I strongly oppose this tagging. 

With kind regards
Nmxosm
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-12-09 10:23:02+00:00): I'm not aware of any software that this has broken, if there is, please let me know. That would be a serious matter.

If your software expects ASCII text, you're not going to be able to work with lots of OSM data. 🙂 Lots of text looks like "black squiggles" to me (yes including this in my JOSM), that's not really a bug, merely a demonstration of how hard it is to display text. JOSM is well able to work with this tags (I added it with JOSM).

OSM is full of "duplicate data", such as "phone" and "contact:phone", and many ways to store the same data (footpaths!). If you're worried about that problem, this should not be your biggest worry.
Nmxosm (2018-12-09 10:34:02+00:00): You're right. These are other problems. But just because bigger problems do exist, smaller problems still should be solved if this can be done easily. In OSM the mass of data is that vast anyway that we can't fix everything (my assumption).
SomeoneElse (2018-12-09 11:36:17+00:00): Hi Rory,
Sorry to be "emojiist" here, but I can think of plenty of things that won't work with that as a "character" (or indeed _any_ emoji as a character).  Many things that prepare data in XML format for Garmin devices, for a start.  If you're entering data that many people can't understand, can't read or can't enter then you're excluding people from OSM data in a way that I'm sure you wouldn't support.
Best Regards,
Andy
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-12-09 12:11:58+00:00): Oh that would be a shame. I've never generated Garmin files. What happens when you do it with characters/tags like that? I'm surprised it hasn't caused a problem yet considering how big & global OSM is already.
SomeoneElse (2018-12-09 13:53:20+00:00): Garmin's XML processing is notoriously flaky.  What tends to happen is it just says that the file is invalid.
It's a bigger issue than Garmin though - I've no idea what the changeset source tag on this change is supposed to mean (looking at the data I can see that you've just done a mechanical edit copying the meaning of one tag into another).  Please don't do this.  Adding tags "just for fun" adds no value to OSM and just causes confusion when people using OSM for the first time (who may have no idea what an emoji is) come across them.
Best Regards,
Andy
Aleks-Berlin (2018-12-11 21:10:19+00:00): please revert this change, because it is problematic for many tools.
there is a good reason why you can find it here:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys#problem

I think OSM is a database, no funny looking text book. Your tag is the only emoji-key in the whole database!

Many thanks, Alex
SomeoneElse (2018-12-11 21:15:17+00:00): Hi Rory,

Do any more people need to jump in before you revert this?

Best Regards,
Andy
Aleks-Berlin (2018-12-11 21:20:26+00:00): I have seen many issues last years with problem-keys or problem-values. E.g. the char 0x7F (a char that is meant to be ignored, to delete what was there, needed in historic times) is interpreted different in OSM tools: some ignore it (as intended), some handle it as an invisinle char without size, some as a space. It caused names including it to be not searchable, even if it was the first or last symbol of string.
keys are more problematic tha values, as no all DB-server-engines out there can handle it as a valid column-identifier.
Aleks-Berlin (2018-12-12 08:19:09+00:00): Firefox under Ubuntu) can show the symbol fine, but Google-Chrome under Windows-7 does only show rectangles. 
try 2 OSM links (examples),
www.openstreetmap.org/way/633453943
taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/%F0%9F%8F%B3%EF%B8%8F%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8C%88
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-12-12 10:47:48+00:00): I did some analysis of current tags, there are almost 100 million non Basic Multilingual Plane characters already in OSM tags.

I'm curious what software will barf on this, and not other non-ASCII characters. What sort of errors do we see? Can we fix that software?

One complaint is about duplication. Perhaps switching from the lgbtq tag to 🏳️‍🌈 might help and be a better key? 😉
SomeoneElse (2018-12-12 12:09:35+00:00): > I'm curious what software will barf on this, 

I've already given an example of this.

> Can we fix that software?

No.  See above.  The only "fix" is to remove the offending data.  That's what I've done when I'm extracting notes and fixmes from OSM for display on Garmin devices.

On a more general note, one of the "golden rules" of OSM is that no matter how much you think you are correct, if "everyone" is telling you you're wrong then you probably are.  

Best Regards,
Andy
Aleks-Berlin (2018-12-12 14:28:09+00:00): Hi rorym, please separate between key and value (key=value). For keys I cannot find any special symbol-sign. Only for some values. And keys are more problematic, see also taginfo for this.
Thanks, Alex
Carnildo (2018-12-12 21:07:41+00:00): On the subject of software not displaying things properly, I'm currently 0 for 9 on web browsers showing this changeset discussion as intended (Seamonkey on Gentoo Linux comes close, but the flag more closely resembles that of the Netherlands than the intended rainbow flag).  Email clients are currently 0 for 4 at displaying comment notifications, with Gmail on Firefox/MacOS coming closest ([white flag] [rainbow between two clouds] = primary).  That's a lot of software we'd need to fix before this could even be considered for use.
Nmxosm (2018-12-20 15:48:06+00:00): Hi rorym, 

do you plan to just wait for this to be forgotten? There are a lot of things now presented as broken and there hasn't been any reaction on that yet.

Greetings
Nmxosm
LeifRasmussen (2018-12-20 16:14:51+00:00): The Overpass Turbo Query Wizard does not handle emoji.  Reverting might be hard.  We would really like you to revert this edit - it is not part of the OSM community culture to revert other contributors intentional edits.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Brc4VFihJ0MxROzQkU78QhZ41xBnC0hM/view?usp=sharing
SomeoneElse (2018-12-20 17:43:22+00:00): I can handle the revert if necessary.  When doing reverts on behalf of the DWG I'd normally wait a week or so before doing reverts; this changeset has had that time and more and the consensus is pretty clear that it needs to be reverted, unfortunately.
SomeoneElse (2018-12-23 19:13:56+00:00): Looks like this got reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65667895 .
gileri (2018-12-10 22:20:03+00:00): Ça a l'air pas mal, merci pour la correction !

J'ai juste restauré le chemin d'accès au bassin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65358075
Carto'Cité (2020-01-08 17:07:08+00:00): Salut Florimond,
J'ai un doute sur ce way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30732865
Dans le commentaire tu parles de DSC et la description cycleway:left=track + oneway:bicycle=no + oneway=yes (cas T3 de la page bicycle). Est-ce que tu te souviens si c'était bien ça ?
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF