piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dasmarinas_mapper (2020-10-29 19:38:34+00:00): Note:

Yes, the border of Dasmariñas with Silang straddles the International Institute of Rural Reconstruction. This is because the city/municipal borders were set long before the IIRR was built.

While it is without dispute that the address of the IIRR is located within Silang, Cavite, this should not change the Dasmariñas-Silang boundary in maps as only an Act of Congress may change city/municipal boundaries - not institutions, subdivision developers, nor local governments themselves.
user_5359 (2020-11-01 06:49:38+00:00): Hello! You use the unknown keys fuel:95E10,
fuel:98E5. Did you mean fuel:octane_95, fuel:octane_98?
jozin-belgium (2022-01-25 19:05:21+00:00): These things always change. But I indeed meant fuel:octane_95 and fuel:octane_98. I removed the two other.
!bm (2020-10-29 21:39:44+00:00): Hallo Hollul,
ist es bereits nutzbar/freigegeben?
--besteGrüße!bm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93252272
Hollul (2020-10-29 21:50:36+00:00): Hallo !bm,
heute war dort schon ein Fahrrad angeschlossen und die Halteverbotsschilder waren auch schon zur Seite gestellt. Also denke ich ja. :)
DaCor (2020-11-04 10:38:40+00:00): Hi, can oyu clarify what you have added to the map. You have added a point called Meadowgate Garden to the road, but no indication what this is. 

What is Meadowgate Garden?
meadowgate garden (2020-11-04 10:55:39+00:00): Its a private garden open to the public.
DaCor (2020-11-04 19:36:03+00:00): Hi, I have mapped 2 properties nearby where you marked the map. Is it one of these properties where the garden is open to the public. Is there a webpage or contact details or entry fee etc to be added?
Viajero Perdido (2020-12-18 19:30:33+00:00): Hi.  I'm curious, where did "Western Mature Area" come from?  Not from imagery, obviously, but that's all you've credited as a source..

That odd-sounding name doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere on edmonton.ca, and a search of the broader internet just brings up dating sites...
Viajero Perdido (2020-12-18 19:43:38+00:00): Ah, I guess we had this conversation (or one like it) already; I'm forgetful.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89141862

Still, I can't find this name, even on the city's map you mentioned there.
Arctic gnome (2021-01-09 21:25:59+00:00): The name "Mature Area" applies to a large area approximately bordered by 137 Ave in the north, 149 Street in the west, 34 Ave in the south, and the rail line in the east. Most sub-parts of this regions have their own names, like Avenue District and Greater Hardisty. But I didn't know what to do with the sub-parts of the Mature Area that don't have their own name. So, "Western Mature Area" isn't so much a name as it is a description; more like small-w "western Mature Area".
Viajero Perdido (2021-01-09 21:47:40+00:00): Thanks for replying.  If these conspicuous "names" aren't used anywhere in public sphere, only in the bowels of the planning department, maybe they should be tagged as description=*, not name=*.

My opinion, but your department.  :)
ibanez (2021-05-10 08:15:40+00:00): Was ist hier? Ist das privat?
eggie (2020-10-29 19:45:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review..
covered=no hoort niet op een reguliere toegangsweg.
Is de straatnaam wel een officiële door de Gemeente  toegewezen naam. Zoniet dan taggen we loc_name=.... 
Het kerkgebouw heeft immers als adres Heidseweg

MVG,
Eggie
dasmarinas_mapper (2020-10-29 19:34:08+00:00): Notes:

Yes, Imus has that weird extension all the way to Molino-Paliparan Road. There is a road sign that welcomes motorists to Barangay Pasong Buaya II, Imus along Molino-Paliparan Road.

Also yes, the northwestern boundary of Dasmariñas and Imus straddles Golden City, and the boundary with Bacoor straddles Avida Settings Cavite. This is because the border was set long before the subdivisions was built. Do NOT use subdivisions as guides for city/municipal boundaries as only an Act of Congress can amend those boundaries and not subdivision developers nor local governments themselves.

Boundaries are set in accordance with RA 9723. Do not revert back to previous version. This may require minor detailed changes but this is as close as it gets - unlike the previous version which is weirdly based on subdivision boundaries.
ottwiz (2020-10-29 19:24:38+00:00): műhold = Esri, ne kössetek bele, hozzávagyok szokva a műholdképhez a légifotó helyett! :)
ottwiz (2020-10-29 19:28:04+00:00): Esri, Maxar, FÖMI stb azok mind légi/ortofotók, ezt tudom :D
karina250 (2020-10-29 19:49:58+00:00): #YouthMappersufba
tyrobert (2020-10-29 19:33:56+00:00): #MicrosoftLife

#OXOMapathon2020

#OXOGive

#missingmaps

#microsoft

#msft

#OXOCalcOPX
andergrin (2020-10-30 04:51:21+00:00): Контури будівель треба вирівнювати, це можна зробити виділивши контур і натиснути Q
eggie (2020-10-29 20:23:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

review.. Alle begin is moeilijk.. Overschat je zelf niet. Tip Beperk je in het begin in het aantal veranderingen.
Niet alles is goed gegaan.
Gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend. Waarom is de geneentewerf een een stadhuis?
Op fietspaden hoort geen bicycle=designated  en foot=designated

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93254188
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-29 20:25:25+00:00): Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. Dit gebeurt meestal om het spel PokemonGo te beïnvloeden.
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
eggie (2020-10-29 20:34:49+00:00): Ga je de landuse weer herstellen. Nu is er alleen nog maar een transparant leisure=park?
eggie (2020-10-29 20:37:48+00:00): Een klein stukje heb ik als voorbeeld ingevuld. Svp dit eerst doen voordat je verder gaat met het veranderen van edits van medemappers.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-29 20:43:10+00:00): Sinds wanneer is het voetgangersgebied een fietspad geworden.
Is het niet gewoon highway=pedestrian met evt. bicycle=yes.?
Thomas Klaassen (2020-10-29 20:55:10+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback. Word gewaardeerd. In de Vuldersbrink is het deel wat ik aangegeven heb een verplicht fietspad waar men ook mag lopen. Landgebruik is ondertussen al aangepast.
Thomas Klaassen (2020-10-29 20:59:09+00:00): In de Vuldersbrink is eigenlijk gewoon dezelfde situatie qua fiets- en voetpad als in het Hortuspark
eggie (2020-10-29 21:09:12+00:00): Oke..  Jij bent de lokale mapper.. dus je kunt het weten.
Goed dat je de landuse weer hebt aangevuld. er is hier veel veranderd inderdaad.
Veel plezier met mappen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2020-10-29 21:12:59+00:00): Voor amenity=townhall zou je even in de wiki kunnen kijken bij office=?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:office

Zelf zie ik het ook zo snel niet.
eggie (2020-10-29 21:15:41+00:00): Wellicht
office	government		An office of a (supra)national, regional or local government agency or department
eggie (2020-10-30 08:20:41+00:00): Staat er een bord fietspad als je de Hortus binnen komt?
Het stukje naar de Academiestraat (poortje)  stond op voetpad. Daar heb ik highway=path metbicycle yes en surface paved van gemaakt.
Het zou anders niet routeren hier voor fietsers.
Dat gaat dan halverwege over in een officieel fietspad? Moet dat niet ook path zijn?
Iets is pas een fietspad als er een verkeersbord G13, 11 of 12a staat. Check dit nog even.
Verder heb ik de dubbel ingetekende landuse verwijderd. (landuse=grass)
Goed kijken of er al iets is ingetekend. 
Probeer er svp wat tijd in te stoppen om het wat netter te maken. 
MVG,
eggie
Puxan (2020-10-31 19:18:32+00:00): Buen trabajo
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93254320
eggie (2020-10-29 20:28:10+00:00): De landuse heb je hier vervangen door de functie van speeltuin. Die speelplaats kun je in je ook intekenen in de landuse. 
mvg
eggie
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:54:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93254393
dasmarinas_mapper (2020-10-29 19:55:19+00:00): Notes:

Yes, Imus has that weird extension all the way to Molino-Paliparan Road. There is a road sign that welcomes motorists to Barangay Pasong Buaya II, Imus along Molino-Paliparan Road.

Also yes, the northwestern boundary of Dasmariñas and Imus straddles Golden City, and the boundary with Bacoor straddles Avida Settings Cavite. This is because the border was set long before the subdivisions was built. Do NOT use subdivisions as guides for city/municipal boundaries as only an Act of Congress can amend those boundaries and not subdivision developers nor local governments themselves.

Boundaries are set in accordance with RA 9723. Do not revert back to previous version. This may require minor detailed changes but this is as close as it gets - unlike the previous version which is weirdly based on subdivision boundaries.
syntex (2020-10-29 20:04:43+00:00): What are you doing? Why are you destroing the military areas?
GeoTek BS (2020-10-29 20:08:25+00:00): This line of contact no longer exists. The Azerbaijani army is restoring its sovereign borders.
syntex (2020-10-29 20:10:12+00:00): It still exist, they have not captured the whole Karabakh yet.
GeoTek BS (2020-10-29 20:24:59+00:00): Don't be nervous and don't worry, today Shusha, tomorrow Khankendi, Agdere will end by itself.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-29 20:31:10+00:00): @GeoTek BS Please provide sources for the changes that you are making.
syntex (2020-10-29 20:48:26+00:00): His recent edits are politically motivated. They contribute nothing to the map. He is  deleting armenian names and military areas (front lines between armenian and azerbaijani forces). These lines still exist, you just cant delete them. They can be deleted in the future, if the Azerbaijan retakes control of the whole Nagorno-Karabakh republic. But for now it is not the case. I added the recent frontline on the map, I also restored azerbaijani names to the empty villages in the region. I try to be neutral here and I consider all his recent changesets as a vandalism. I can only accept deleting the front line between the Fuzuli and Iran border, because the frontline moved in that area.
syntex (2020-10-29 21:24:42+00:00): I have reverted all changes from his recent changesets
GeoTek BS (2020-10-29 21:26:55+00:00): You can undo all my changes, but they are inevitable, I am ready to spend years to correct every letter on this card. I wish you all the best.
GeoTek BS (2020-10-29 21:28:15+00:00): My desire is that, as a citizen of Azerbaijan, I could see my cities under my name, in the Azerbaijani language and no more. It is also not correct to draw any borders in the center of the country, whose state borders are accepted by all countries of the world, even by Armenia itself. The occupation of our lands has come to an end, and we are simply restoring our rights. We have been waiting for this moment for 27 years, we will wait another month.
dasmarinas_mapper (2020-10-29 19:58:51+00:00): Note:

Yes, the border of Dasmariñas with Silang straddles the International Institute of Rural Reconstruction. This is because the city/municipal borders were set long before the IIRR was built.

While it is without dispute that the address of the IIRR is located within Silang, Cavite, this should not change the Dasmariñas-Silang boundary in maps as only an Act of Congress may change city/municipal boundaries - not institutions, subdivision developers, nor local governments themselves.
syntex (2020-10-29 20:06:54+00:00): No, it still exists. These change is wrong
syntex (2020-10-29 20:07:39+00:00): *This
GeoTek BS (2020-10-29 20:11:56+00:00): Do you doubt Azerbaijan's determination to restore its sovereign borders? Your information is incorrect.
GeoTek BS (2020-10-29 20:22:10+00:00): Listen dear, what do you dislike? there is no more line of contact.
Oskarst_ (2023-10-22 10:08:46+00:00): Hei, 
Ser du har kartlagt Kongskleiva. Hva tenker du om kartlegginga av stien etter at den ble restaurert? Bør den nå følge de nye trappene mot toppen av Kongsfjellet?
Dani_Sees (2020-11-02 17:04:51+00:00): Üdv! 
Valaki aki jobban ért hozzá, az át tudná írni a a 446-448-as buszok útvonalát? Mindkét irányba nem a Fürdő u.-Állomás út-Ady stny. útvonalon haladnak, hanem csak az Isaszegi úton. a 440-444 és a távolságiak pedig csak Valkó felé terelve haladnak, az Ady sétány-Fürdő utca (itt meg is állnak)-Állomás út útvonalon haladnak.
Omegatherion (2021-04-10 13:28:30+00:00): Moin thedarkx,

du hast hier die Nutzung für Kraftfahrzeuge nicht nur erlaubt, sondern als vorgebende Nutzung eingetragen. Sind die Tags bei ID mal wieder falsch bezeichnet?

Gruß Omegatherion
thedarkx (2021-04-10 17:47:52+00:00): Moin,
"designated" ist mit "Bezeichnete/vorgesehene Nutzungsart" übersetzt. Für mich klang das damals wahrscheinlich passen.
aodwonder (2021-01-05 21:16:08+00:00): Добрый день. Почему часть треков по ключам-значениям highway-track вы потерли, отметив их всякими разными тэгами без визуализации, тем самым по сути закрыв возможность видеть эти грунтовки (лыжные трассы) в общем доступе на osm вне редактора? В чем смысл таких коррекций, если они не видны простым пользователям? Заранее спасибо за пояснения.
Glassman (2020-10-30 14:57:20+00:00): Tip: building outlines should match what is on the imagery. 
Tip: square buildings by selecting their outline then just type a "q"

Can you clean up these buildings to match what's on the imagery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93255399
dasmarinas_mapper (2020-10-29 20:23:04+00:00): Notes:

Yes, Imus has that weird extension all the way to Molino-Paliparan Road. There is a road sign that welcomes motorists to Barangay Pasong Buaya II, Imus along Molino-Paliparan Road.

Also yes, the northwestern boundary of Dasmariñas and Imus straddles Golden City, and the boundary with Bacoor straddles Avida Settings Cavite. This is because the border was set long before the subdivisions was built. Do NOT use subdivisions as guides for city/municipal boundaries as only an Act of Congress can amend those boundaries and not subdivision developers nor local governments themselves.

Boundaries are set in accordance with RA 9723. Do not revert back to previous version. This may require minor detailed changes but this is as close as it gets - unlike the previous version which is weirdly based on subdivision boundaries.
push-f (2022-06-29 22:25:50+00:00): This changeset added education=no to the Pacific Northwest Trail. Was this done by accident or what is the intended meaning?
Shawn Noble (2022-06-30 02:27:50+00:00): Likely added accidentally. My log for this changeset doesnt include my putting the tag in so it probably got dragged in from somewhere. I am not in a situation to adjust, but there is no particular reason to my knowledge that it should be attached to this object, at least in this manner.
DD1GJ (2020-10-30 15:19:43+00:00): Hallo Storgatan, Luftbilder haben immer einen gewissen Versatz. Bezogen auf das Gebäude war der Hubschrauberlandeplatz korrekt eingezeichnet. Zudem war er über eine Relation ein Teil der Gebäudestruktur, was durch das Löschen zerstört wurde. Ich habe daher Deine Änderung komplett zurückgesetzt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Verwende bitte den im Tutorial beschriebenen Editor JOSM. Der gibt Warnungen aus, wenn eine Relation beschädigt werden könnte.

Viele Grüße, Joachim

PS: in normalen Zeiten gibt es in Lübeck einen OSM-Stammtisch; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCbecker_Mappertreffen
eggie (2020-10-29 21:22:29+00:00): Zo is het weer actueel!
Lijkt me prima zo. 
Gr eggie
Roef (2020-10-30 07:18:34+00:00): Dag Geim,
Volgens mij heb je in deze wijziging een aantal routes en knooppunten verwijderd uit het Wandelnetwerk Drenthe (https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/changeset/93256640/4260447). Kreeg je geen merge-conflict?
Groet, Roef
Geim (2020-10-30 14:04:54+00:00): Hoi Roef,
Ja, had ik wel. Shit. Sorry. Dacht dat ik alles na die tijd gecontroleerd had. Weet niet wat er mis gegaan is. Ben nu op het werk, wil het vanavond wel oplossen, maar als jij tijd hebt dan mag dat ook.
Reverten gaat fout, te veel wijzigingen nadien.

Gr. Geim
Roef (2020-10-30 14:30:33+00:00): Ik denk dat ik er vanavond niet meer aan toe kom, dus als jij dat zou willen doen? Bij de bovenstaande link van knooppuntnet zie je precies om welke knooppunten en routes het gaat, en volgens mij kun je die dan ook zo openen in JOSM.
Dit is dus ook een nadeel van grote netwerken...

Groet Roef
Geim (2020-10-30 14:46:51+00:00): Ja, ken de link, gebruik hem zelf ook. Zal ik ook beginnen de incorrecte expected= aan te passen?
https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/network-facts/11325524
Roef (2020-11-02 11:43:14+00:00): Ik zie m'n knooppunten weer op de kaart. Bedankt!
Geim (2020-11-02 15:17:43+00:00): Top, kun je weer verder :-) Nog genoeg te doen in midden Drenthe.
Vraagje: Jij voegt begin- en eindnode ook toe aan de routerelatie. Ik doe dat niet, heb er alleen wegen op staan. Beide werken, maar wat is de juiste methode?
Roef (2020-11-02 15:28:52+00:00): Er is volgens mij geen juiste methode. Ik doe dat sinds ik #97 gelezen heb in deze discussie: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70806&p=4
eggie (2020-10-29 21:21:14+00:00): yep.. prima zo
rickmastfan67 (2021-08-10 05:35:29+00:00): Um, I think you got this wrong. (not the road itself, but the route designation).  The Bypass is posted as US-301 Bypass.  The route of mainline US-301 still goes into the town.
Wulf4096 (2020-10-30 00:31:21+00:00): Hallo!

Wozu "access=yes"?
Da ist bereits "motorcar=yes" und "motorcycle=yes" dran.
Man könnte das nun so interpretieren, dass man dort sämtliche Verkehrsarten aufladen kann, also z. B. Fahrräder, Busse und Fußgänger.
TjarkOSM (2020-10-30 00:39:36+00:00): Moin,
der Doku nach beschreibt der Tag access "rechtliche Zugangsregelungen eines Elements". Die Station ist für alle zugänglich.  Im Zusammenhang mit der Ladestation gebe ich dir recht, aber in der Dokumentation ist dazu nichts näheres erwähnt. Die Tags zu motercar und motorcycle habe ich wohl übersehen. Von mir aus kann der Tag wieder raus, um keine Verwirrung zu stiften.
dval (2020-10-30 11:27:54+00:00): Hi, StargunRU! Как у вас так получается, что вы вносите правки на западе РФ, а их видно далеко на востоке? Не могли бы несколько ограничить район при работе с каждым конктетным объектом: загрузили кусок карты, внесли правки, выгрузили, почистили/удалили слои в редакторе, загрузили следующий и т.д.?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93258102
aharvey (2020-10-30 00:07:25+00:00): hi, thanks for the edit. The old BP tags were on the grounds not on the building, so I've transferred the ones you added over to the grounds to replace the BP ones and restored the building=retail tag on the building way.
aweech (2020-10-29 22:28:16+00:00): Hi,
Please stop messing up the alignment of the Ashuelot River. The Bing imagery layer is several meters out-of-alignment in this part of the state.
dentonny (2021-08-22 07:31:45+00:00): dag Jul,

Heb je over deze fietsroute wat meer informatie? Ik ben bezig met de baan Ezaart te actualiseren en deze route loopt er over. Maar dit lijkt mij zo een vreemde route?

mvg
dentonny
Cascafico (2020-10-30 09:25:53+00:00): Ciao,
c'è un consenso piuttosto ampio nel non mettere name e ref sulle way, ma piuttosto nelle realzioni.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93258815
LDR52 (2020-10-31 17:10:53+00:00): Scusa, non ho capito cosa vuoi dire. Ho sbagliato qualcosa?
Cascafico (2020-10-31 22:26:46+00:00): No, nessun errore, ma abbiamo valutato che una way può appartenere a più sentieri; inoltre assegnare il name o ref (per esempio CAI133) ad ogni way che lo compone è più oneroso da fare e modificare in seguito.
Se non lo hai ancora fatto, dai un'occhiata a come sono strutturate le relazioni dei sentieri CAI... lo vedi meglio qui
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=8.106950081979464!46.2215!13.1289
LDR52 (2020-11-01 21:31:28+00:00): Ciao Cascafico
A quanto pare "finalmente " ho trovato qualcuno che può insegnarmi qualcosa.
Finora ho caricato dei tratti di sentieri senza sapere veramente se facevo bene o male.
Mi piacerebbe molto avere una guida per fare le cose per bene.
Comunque guardando i sentieri già strutturati vicino a dove abito, ho (immediatamente) notato dei grossissimi errori, per esempio a riguardo  del sentiero Munchen-Venezia, e non solo.
Quindi tirando le somme se mi puoi insegnare come posso fare le cose giuste ti ringrazio.
Cascafico (2020-11-02 10:33:47+00:00): Se vuoi consigli al volo, canale telegram:   
https://t.me/OpenStreetMapFvg

altrimenti le Mailing list:   
Italiana  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it   
FVG https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-fvg   
CAI https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-cai
R0bst3r (2020-11-03 07:49:24+00:00): Hallo Iamhereonopenstreetmap,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* laut offiziellen Karten (Maps4BW) heisst die Straße Hasenäcker, Ubbachstraße ist die nördlich davon. Kannst du dies ändern oder bestätigen?
Viel Erfolg noch!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93259082
Iamhereonopenstreetmap (2020-11-03 10:36:02+00:00): Danke für die Prüfung und die Hilfe. Habe ich entsprechend geändert.
Глеб (2020-10-30 06:19:08+00:00): У вас ошибочка с забором, я поправил
dgitto (2021-01-31 06:31:28+00:00): Ma sei sicuro che non sia la Parafarmacia che era mappata precedentemente? Sembra ancora aperta
https://www.facebook.com/parafarmaciagiolitti/
Sembra un errore anche perché hai inserito addr:street=Via Pasubio, mentre qui siamo sempre in Via Giolitti.
C'è anche una nota: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2518980
mascalzone67 (2021-01-31 10:59:42+00:00): Hai ragione. Ho scoperto adesso che esiste una farmacia comunale che era visibile e quindi i dati che messo andrebbero trasferti. 
https://www.comune.bardonecchia.to.it/23463-2/
45.08055,6.69659
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-02 09:29:11+00:00): Ho sistemato io.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-30 10:48:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 93284943 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some childish vandalism in Keyworth and elsewhere.
user_3022894 (2020-12-20 17:05:38+00:00): Hi x a,
ich wollte dir nur kurz ein kleines Lob aussprechen, vielen Dank dafür, dass du das Basistelefon so detailliert eingetragen hast!
Viele Grüße,
Lukas
Hb- (2020-10-30 07:40:30+00:00): Source is https://twitter.com/firtisgulu/status/1321882387844878336
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-30 10:48:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 93284943 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some childish vandalism in Keyworth and elsewhere.