piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kovoschiz (2020-02-12 13:41:06+00:00): * 1. I should add the circular roadway on hamburger junctions / throughabouts are also considered `junction=circular`.
Kovoschiz (2020-02-12 13:45:14+00:00): A 4-way, or T-junction (if it exists) throughabout would still have a `junction=circular`, because there's only a single junction inside. This does not constitute a network. 
The situation here is that the road is grade-separated over the circular junction, therefore there's only one terminal for Tai Tam Reservoir Rd. Topologically, it would not matter whether the spur lies "inside" or "outside" this circular junction.
Hjart (2020-02-11 19:29:15+00:00): Bemærk at navne uden angivne kategorier (er de butikker?), ikke vises på kortet.
dktue (2020-02-12 11:28:08+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur des Umrisses!

Ich habe gemäß "One feature one OSM element" [1] den Tag "amenity=fire_station" vom Gebäude entfernt, siehe auch [2].

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station
fs_LT (2020-02-12 11:37:14+00:00): Vielen Dank! Habe ich übersehen.
user_5359 (2020-02-11 14:07:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2020-02-11 14:21:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
rskedgell (2020-02-11 11:43:21+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this business in OpenStreetMap.

There is a problem with your use of https://www.chefonline.co.uk/ as a data source, which is that the data are subject to copyright.

ChefOnline's Terms and Conditions at https://www.chefonline.co.uk/terms-and-conditions make it quite clear that "No material from the site may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posed, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy of the materials on any single computer for your non-commercial use only, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices."

Please revert all the changes which you have made using this data source.

Please also read
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
Allison P (2020-02-11 15:35:30+00:00): Hello gemstateroofing,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Ensure you are using standardised tagging and don't use description=* for advertising messages. If you have any questions, let me know.

Allison Pelton
Allison P (2020-02-11 15:36:27+00:00): Also, in the future make sure you are tagging the way rather than a node in the way.
eggie (2020-02-11 11:15:21+00:00): Dag Boris,
Kijk nog even.. het is nog niet helemaal goed. Editor iD heeft een soort ingebouwde lijm.
Je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=80843411
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-11 13:43:00+00:00): pad losgemaakt van buurtgrens
rskedgell (2020-02-11 11:44:22+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this business in OpenStreetMap.

There is a problem with your use of https://www.chefonline.co.uk/ as a data source, which is that the data are subject to copyright.

ChefOnline's Terms and Conditions at https://www.chefonline.co.uk/terms-and-conditions make it quite clear that "No material from the site may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posed, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy of the materials on any single computer for your non-commercial use only, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices."

Please revert all the changes which you have made using this data source.

Please also read
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
rskedgell (2020-02-11 11:35:10+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Adding three nodes with tourism=attraction is not particularly useful, as it gives no information about what the purported attraction actually is.

Please read
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction

If you need any help. please ask.
BCNorwich (2020-02-11 12:24:25+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've looked at at your additions to OSM and made quite a few amendments so that they are aligned with OSM best practice. I squared up a lot of the buildings, adjusted buildings and area outlines. Removed the unnecessary relation. Placed POI data on the building outlines. Thus the buildings look a lot neater and the OSM database holds all data in less space, (building and POI data is not duplicated).

Regards Bernard.
rskedgell (2020-02-11 11:45:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this business in OpenStreetMap.

There is a problem with your use of https://www.chefonline.co.uk/ as a data source, which is that the data are subject to copyright.

ChefOnline's Terms and Conditions at https://www.chefonline.co.uk/terms-and-conditions make it quite clear that "No material from the site may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posed, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy of the materials on any single computer for your non-commercial use only, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices."

Please revert all the changes which you have made using this data source.

Please also read
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
Syl (2020-02-11 11:08:52+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez déplacé un point d'une route ce qui a fait qu'elle passait à travers des bâtiments. Faites attention à vos modifications avant de les envoyer, j'ai annulé ce déplacement.
LBA_SNT (2020-02-13 08:37:40+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre retour. Comme évoqué, les changements sont réalisés par des élèves en formation SNT. Quelques erreurs peuvent survenir. Cordialement
Syl (2020-02-13 10:56:32+00:00): Bonjour, oui je sais que ce sont des changements faits dans ce cadre.
Mais ce serait à vous de vérifier les modifications qui sont faites et de corriger d'éventuelles erreurs plutôt que d'autres membres de la communauté OSM (généralement bénévoles).
Je n'ai signalé que les erreurs les plus importantes, il en reste d'autres faites avec ce compte, je peux donner des précisions si besoin.
Cordialement.
rskedgell (2020-02-11 11:46:31+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this business in OpenStreetMap.

There is a problem with your use of https://www.chefonline.co.uk/ as a data source, which is that the data are subject to copyright.

ChefOnline's Terms and Conditions at https://www.chefonline.co.uk/terms-and-conditions make it quite clear that "No material from the site may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posed, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy of the materials on any single computer for your non-commercial use only, provided that you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices."

Please revert all the changes which you have made using this data source.

Please also read
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
nevw (2020-02-11 11:55:31+00:00): Hi
Why have you added the tag amenity=place of worship to you business edit?
nevw (2020-02-13 04:29:11+00:00): deleted amenity=place_of_worship added to business listing, de-spammed description, deleted spurious tag
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:38:02+00:00): Hi, Ferry route access=no. Why
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:42:12+00:00): Reverted
tuxayo (2020-02-18 05:56:52+00:00): Bonjour, l'attribut "nom" n'est pas une description de l'objet. Il ne faut donc pas écrire "batiment" comme nom.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
tuxayo (2020-02-18 06:11:00+00:00): La description du groupe de modification est là pour documenter aux autres personnes contributrices ce qui a été fait.

Donc "faite ce que vous voulez" n'est pas correct.
tuxayo (2020-02-18 06:13:15+00:00): L'intersection "Rue Alphonse Daudet" avec "Traverse des Cyprès" a été modifiée[1] et d'après les images aériennes, cela semble être une être une erreur car la version précédente était plus conforme.

[1] https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=80845592
eggie (2020-02-11 11:55:22+00:00): Review.. Oke.. Je zou de serviceweg kunnen intekeken met highway=service en service=parkng_aisle
Gr eggie
Supaplex (2020-06-18 13:48:05+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
nevw (2020-02-11 11:59:21+00:00): Hi
Can you map your business over the building you operate from instead of locating in the middle of the road way thanks
nevw (2020-02-13 04:33:50+00:00): no response, reverted.
ALu68 (2020-02-11 22:11:57+00:00): Hallo, an die Linie der "Oberländer Straße" gehört keine Hausnummer.
name = Oberländer Straße 49
tux67 (2020-02-11 11:39:29+00:00): Hi, with this change you have connected 2 public roads while your added "shortcut" is now potentially crossing private property.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80847045
ErraticThunder (2020-02-11 12:32:10+00:00): Hi tux67 

Thanks for reviewing my edit. we made this edit partially based on the gps traces of our Delivery partner. Please refer the changeset( 80849967) for the suggested modifications. Do let me know in case of any further changes.

Regards 
asnghpi
4004 (2020-02-16 22:03:31+00:00): have you got anything to confirm the smoothness values? last time I drove there, it was intermediate to good
aharvey (2020-02-21 07:43:42+00:00): Hi Seb

I noticed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473020371 you added a few cycle tags. Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Shared_cycle_lanes since there is no distinct motor vehicle and bicycle lane, instead both share the same space this is just cycleway=shared_lane.

Then since it's a shared lane, cycleway:lane doesn't make sense anymore.

On top of this I'm not sure what cyclelane=yes is for?

Lastly it's not wrong to add oneway:bicycle=yes but this is already implied by oneway=yes so not necesarry.
Ninjoh (2020-02-12 17:10:04+00:00): Please don't use Esri World Imagery in the vicinity of the Netherlands or in the Netherlands itself. In the Netherlands and near the Dutch border there is the "PDOK aerial imagery" source which is updated every summer, with a resolution of 25cm/pixel. This imagery layer is available in the imagery selection list in the iD editor.
puppalg (2020-02-14 05:02:22+00:00): Hi Ninjoh,

Appreciating your time for looking into my edit. We are making the edits based on the multiple resources and going with the most updated one. We are not sure how the "Imagery used" column is auto capturing every time we toggle between different imagery irrespective of the presence of aerial/street view. It is not populating as any tag to make any further edits. It will be helpful if you can suggest any action items to avoid such issues. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
puppalg
azakh-world (2020-02-11 12:00:24+00:00): Hello! Now you map wrong stop_area_group relations. They should contain only stop_area relations at interchange stations. Also you forget "subway=yes" on stations. Need them "train=yes"? Really these subway infrastructure is shared with some train routes?
Please, let me finish fixing, for no conflicts (and new errors) arise.
北巷猫眠 (2020-02-11 12:05:12+00:00): Sorry, I thought you have already done this.
azakh-world (2020-02-12 08:07:13+00:00): I've finished.
Contribution of each mapper is valuable and I appreciate your effort. Meanwhile  OSM data is used by different people/organizations, and subways is quite complex and fragile data layer. Please keep it in mind. (I've spent a workday putting the Chengdu subway in order, because I've not just reverted, but saved all your geometry and other improvements).

Have a good mapping!
北巷猫眠 (2020-02-12 08:10:33+00:00): thanks a lot!
kartonage (2020-02-11 13:17:39+00:00): Hej jcerretani,

you have created 94 empty nodes all over the globe in this changeset and empty nodes in other changesets. If you need to test access/upload/editing to OSM, I would advise to use a development server (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing#Experiment_with_the_API_.28advanced.29). Otherwise your uploads will be live immediately including errors or empty nodes, etc.

Best regards
pangoSE (2020-02-16 15:33:50+00:00): This should be reverted. Can you fix it kartonage?
kartonage (2020-02-16 15:35:32+00:00): Already cleaned up by Atakua in cs 80863105 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80863105) but thanks for checking in!

Cheers
archie (2020-02-11 12:09:04+00:00): Hej, skulle du vilja göra byggnaderna rektangulära. Markera dem ett i taget och tryck tangenten "Q" så blir de rätvinkliga. Tack!
user_5359 (2020-02-11 14:00:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ALu68 (2020-02-11 22:16:58+00:00): Nodes deleted.
ALu68 (2020-02-11 22:16:38+00:00): Nodes deleted.
archie (2020-02-11 12:22:26+00:00): Kolla byggnaden en gång till. Gör den rätvinklig genom att markera den och sedan trycker du på tangenten "Q". Byggnaden överlappar cykelvägen och dess sydöstra hörna hänger ihop med en outline. Kan du fixa detta?
archie (2020-02-12 06:23:31+00:00): Hej, du råkade bryta den här multipolygonen när du editerade byggnaden (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756593755/history). Jag har lagat den nu. Försök att undvika sådant, tack.
Luzandro (2020-02-11 18:18:26+00:00): Hallo Reiner,

wenn du deiner Meinung nach unnötige access-Tags entfernst, achte bitte darauf, dass du dabei nicht auch noch andere, wie "bridge" löscht. JOSM hätte offenbar nur dann eine Warnung ausgegeben, wenn du gleichzeitig auch noch das layer=1 entfernt hättest
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/751659441

Ich würde dich auch bitten korrekte landcover-Angaben nicht einfach zu löschen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landcover
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/landcover

LG Andreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80849666
Langlaeufer (2024-05-06 20:24:18+00:00): Hallo Lutz,

Bis du dir sicher mit den Gebäuden Eichelkampstr. 35 und das hinter 35 A?
35 sehe ich in den Luftbilder gar nicht, nur Bäume und das andere hat eine ganz andere Form.

Grüße Langläufer
Langlaeufer (2024-05-06 20:25:13+00:00): Hausnummer 35 ist doppelt
Langlaeufer (2024-05-07 13:16:41+00:00): Das Gebäude gibt es auch nicht in der Stadtkarte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771626428
Nmxosm (2020-03-19 12:09:27+00:00): Hallo Axolord,

in diesem Änderungssatz fügst du nur Informationen hinzu, welche an dem Punkt schon vorhanden waren. Warum hast du das getan?

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2020-04-19 08:46:21+00:00): Mit https://osm.org/changeset/83763324 erledigt.
user_5359 (2020-02-11 14:05:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
iWowik (2020-02-23 20:21:40+00:00): Приветствую вас в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики и к тому же вносите их номера.

Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их сложно найти, чтобы понять где на карте какой адрес, нужна карта.
К тому же у различных карт и планов есть правообладатели и без их явного разрешения данные в OSM вносить нельзя.
Целью проекта является сбор данных, свободных от претензий других лиц, поэтому данные, вносимые без разрешения их владельца могут в какой-то момент быть удалены из проекта.
eggie (2020-02-11 13:17:11+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. en bedankt voor de mutatie.
MVG,
Eggie
iWowik (2020-02-23 19:42:40+00:00):     Рад приветствовать вас в проекте!
    Я заметил, что вы рисуете домики и к тому же пишете в имя номер дома, а также в название населенного пункта (adrr:city) пишете его тип (село) что делать не следует.

    Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
    Обычно их сложно найти, чтобы понять где на карте какой адрес нужна карта или схема.
    К тому же у различных карт и планов есть правообладатели и без их явного разрешения данные в OSM вносить нельзя.
    Целью проекта является сбор данных, свободных от претензий других лиц, поэтому данные, вносимые без разрешения их владельцами могут в какой-то момент быть удалены из проекта.
PLima785 (2020-02-11 17:22:59+00:00): Boa tarde,
Reparei na suas edições e nesta existe duplicação do mesmo sitio (casa da Arquitectura), pode mover o ponto para dentro do rectângulo e neste retirar o nome.
Por favor não apague elementos mais antigos, pois o histórico dos mesmos é importante.
outro ponto importante é usar a imagem de satélite mais actualizada neste caso a ERSI ver:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Uso_de_Imagens#Imagens_sat.C3.A9lite_em_Portugal

Qualquer dúvida temos um canal na app Telegram para responder a essas e outras questões:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos
Pedro Lima
Nmxosm (2020-02-12 09:47:19+00:00): Hallo Axolord,

In deinem Änderungssatz hast du eine Telefonnummer hinzugefügt, die nicht dem in OpenStreetMap üblichen Format ist (siehe https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone). Dadurch können Programme diese leider nicht auswerten. Bitte passe das an.

Zum Überblick sind die folgenden Seiten sicher hilfreich:
https://osm.org/help
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei Fragen melde dich bitte einfach als Antwort hier, schreib unter https://forum.osm.org/ oder einer der zahlreichen Mailinglisten (z.B. http://lists.osm.org/mailman/listinfo/talk-de) oder erstelle eine Note (https://osm.org/note/new)

Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir erstmal weiterhelfen.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2020-04-19 06:37:48+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.

VlG Nmxosm
4004 (2020-02-16 22:10:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771634559/history don't understand where you got the maxspeed from
viloan (2020-02-11 13:03:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BeKri (2020-06-30 10:13:44+00:00): Servus,
die Schreibweise gilt dann hoffentlich auch für den nordwestlichen Teil der
Sickinger Straße
ODER
gibt es Sickinger Straße
und Sickingerstraße ?
Gruss derBeKri
Daniel Mowitz (2020-07-03 14:57:11+00:00): Also wenn man den Straßenschildern glaubt, sind es zwei unterschiedliche Namen… Werde bei nächster gelegenheit mal nach weiteren Schildern ausschau halten und ein Paar Fotos machen.
BeKri (2020-07-05 10:16:06+00:00): Prima, Danke
Daniel Mowitz (2020-09-11 15:44:42+00:00): Also hier mal zwei Bilder, das erste vom südlichen, das zweite vom nördlichen Teil der Straße: https://imgur.com/a/00l3S0n
user_5359 (2020-02-11 14:06:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
muralito (2020-02-11 14:13:46+00:00): Hola Nahuel.

La etiqueta residential=irregular_settlement es para asentamientos irregulares, sin planificacion oficial, y no parece ser este el caso por el amanzanamiento y las parcelas que se ven en la imagen aerea.

¿Que caracteristica es la que queres mapearle?
nahueldl (2020-02-11 16:28:56+00:00): Buenas,
Queria remarcar que el municipio caracteriza al barrio como un “asentamiento informal”, ya que los vecinos del barrio carecen de títulos de propiedad porque los terrenos son tomados. 
Asumí que irregular_settlement era el equivalente a asentamiento informal
¿Es esa la característica que corresponde?
muralito (2020-02-11 16:47:34+00:00): Entonces dejalo así que está bien con irregular_settlement, que es para eso.

Lo que pasa es que en general son bastante mas irregulares tipo villas y las calles y las parcelas se distinguen poco, y esta todo mas apiñado. Como te dije antes, en la imagen aérea por el amanzanamiento bien cuadriculado y las parcelas **parece** planificado y no irregular.
ggamba (2020-02-11 13:32:42+00:00): description errata, Mapping Ranica
eggie (2020-02-11 14:13:29+00:00): Dag limro.. Kwaad kan het niet, maar bicycle=yes is al default net als foot=yes.
motor_vehicle=no is ook default.. vandaar de uitzondering voor gemotoriseerde tweewielers.
MVG,
Eggie
sovereign_ch (2020-02-12 00:14:16+00:00): Mein letzter Hinweis war freundlich, da ich von einem Versehen ausging. Wenn aber (schon wieder!) Gebäude gelöscht werden und nur irgendwelche kruden amenity-Tags übrig bleiben, weil der vorherige Knoten aus unerfindlichen Gründen "nicht gut genug" war, dann werden die Edits in Zukunft kommentarlos rückgängig gemacht. Wir mappen Strassen und Gebäude, alles andere sind abstrakte Funktionen/Nutzungen und in OSM reines Beiwerk und nicht Selbstzweck und ganz sicher nicht vorrangig vor dem Erfassen von Strassen und Gebäuden.
Fijord (2020-02-12 12:53:33+00:00): PN
archie (2020-02-11 14:26:30+00:00): Parkskolan är taggad som amenity=school. Jag har återigen - för tredje gången nu - raderat den nod med school som du nyss satt dit i skolområdet. Varför vill du ha det så när det redan är mappat som skola?
trigpoint (2020-02-19 23:35:58+00:00): Bore da, this is a rather unlikely setting for a neolithic stone circle, maybe tag it as an artwork rather than historic?

Diolch Phil
dzidek23 (2020-02-20 19:19:28+00:00): Edit from aerial images, after visiting this area I do agree that this should be art work rather than historic tag. Will correct once back home.
marc__marc (2020-03-09 16:57:57+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410725121
il y a visiblement une erreur :)