piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2021-07-05 07:19:13+00:00): The landuse=residential overlaps buildings... suggesting that one part of the building is residential while the other part is not..? 

Where waterways (eg drains) cross streets there should be something to indicate how the crossing is made .. in these cases it looks to be a cluvert, layer=-1. 

Use the OSM wiki to look things up 
eg https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert
Warin61 (2021-07-05 07:22:14+00:00): Note: Align your imagery to things already in OSM, that way your added building will not cross roads, enter parks...
Anton Khorev (2021-07-05 15:21:37+00:00): Рокетдатовцы, возможно, специально Ив Роше двумя точками метят: и как магазин, и как салон красоты, который где-то внутри магазина. Только я не знаю, где именно внутри, и рокетдатовцы, конечно, тоже не знают.
Qpl (2021-07-05 20:48:28+00:00): Их точки можно по оверпассу найти, раз они любят себя в контакты писать https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/199d
nitram1234 (2021-07-06 08:29:07+00:00): Hi! Great job with the editing. In the future, could you be careful to not include two distant edits in the same changeset? That would greatly help on the history panel to see where the latest changes have been made. 

Thanks for your help, cheers!
Kovoschiz (2021-07-05 04:47:03+00:00): Doesn't seem meaningful to have a bunch of `leisure=garden` here (nor apparent whether this corridor is one). Are they `landuse=flowerbed` or grassland?
RoamTheCity (2021-07-06 16:57:47+00:00): They are raised landscaped planters with built in benches on the side
compdude (2021-07-14 04:41:53+00:00): Can you please explain why US 95 isn't a freeway between just south exit 438 and just north of exit 446? It clearly looks like one to me, and is certainly long enough.
Howpper (2021-07-14 13:51:20+00:00): This segment is part of a 20+ mile Expressway (trunk road)—it has both at-grade intersections and interchanges. Just because it goes three junctions without an at-grade intersection, doesn't mean a section of this expressway should be marked as a freeway (motorway).
ralley (2021-07-05 00:07:13+00:00): There is no need to add a node as well as the building way - this has resulted in two objects for the entity.  Rather just add any tags that were missing to the existing way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107408139
NBegg (2021-07-05 00:15:24+00:00): The reason for having it as a point and polygon (building) is that these are made into separate layers that feed into different mapping systems.  Some maps will require petrol stations shown as points, others will be interested in it from the building perspective.
❤️‍🔥 (2021-07-06 07:21:48+00:00): Hi NBegg, I agree with ralley, nothing should be mapped twice. If a system you're using only looks at nodes, that's a major flaw with that system and you'd be better off trying to fix that issue, since 173,000 petrol stations are mapped as areas vs ~291,000 as nodes - https://taginfo.osm.org/tags/amenity=fuel
Jakka (2021-07-05 13:31:19+00:00): Voor building: We tekenen slecht het grondcontact van de woning niet het volledig grondgebied waar het op staat ... gebruik de laag GRB en niet uitsluitend de luchtbeelden
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107408303
user_2066394 (2021-08-26 09:16:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190475625
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190475628
Beide Gebäude haben jetzt die Hausnummer Wolfratshauser Straße 44
El ArquiPachuca (2021-07-10 07:02:33+00:00): Creo que la localidad de Doxey, tiene erróneamente la superficie entera como Parque/plaza verde. Seria mejor cambiarlo a área residencial
PT-53 (2022-09-03 05:42:12+00:00): Hallo joe2812,
diese Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961435096/history
hat (noch?) keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-09-11 09:44:09+00:00): Hallo joe2812,
diese Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961435096/history
hat (noch?) keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-09-21 07:13:41+00:00): Hallo joe2812,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-09-28 06:51:52+00:00): Linie gelöscht
GUFSZ (2023-04-14 05:43:41+00:00): Gab es eine Reaktion auf diesen CS Kommentar auf anderem Wege. Auch in Form einer Korrektur?
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-13 03:30:09+00:00): Hi roptat, just a note, try to avoid adding descriptions in the name tag. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
In this specific case, you can use the species tag to denote the type of animal, or alternatively tag it as landuse=animal_keeping and then do something like animal_keeping=horse https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Danimal_keeping
Mashin (2021-07-05 05:20:04+00:00): Hi Paparobzzi, 
thanks for your edits. Just a small thing: the name tag on building is not for descriptive information but for the actual name  e.g. Empire State Building. Also the patio and pool area does not look to me like a building, but more like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating ?

Otherwise great work!
user_5359 (2021-07-05 16:11:04+00:00): Hello! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5415803233
lasagna (2021-07-05 03:01:27+00:00): Here's the full source that was too long for the source tag:
Assembly Concurrent Resolution 21, in resolution chapter 24 from the 1993 session of the California state assembly.
See page 1507 of this PDF: https://clerk.assembly.ca.gov/sites/clerk.assembly.ca.gov/files/archive/Statutes/1993/1993_Stats_vol4.pdf#page=1507
SafetyIng (2021-07-05 07:17:33+00:00): Hey,
did you forget the driveway-tag?
bmmundad (2021-07-06 08:30:47+00:00): Hello, 
I have added highway=service as there are multiple entities and their type is unkown. Thanks for the feedback. I have added service=driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset(107481533) with modifications.
 Regards,
 bmmundad.
adiatmad (2021-07-05 09:10:29+00:00): Assalamualaikum. Terima kasih bantuannya Bang. Sehat selalu ya =)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107412685
AkuAnakTimur (2021-07-16 17:52:54+00:00): Waalaikumussalam. Alhamdulillah. Moga semua sihat-sihat juga di sana.
user_11418917 (2021-07-05 04:08:12+00:00): Source?
user_11418917 (2021-07-05 04:09:00+00:00): This is literally your OSM account name translated in Arabic! you can't put your name in osm like this. so, Reverted!
user_11418917 (2021-07-05 04:20:59+00:00): I Reverted your spam on the map. you can't just change villages names to your own tribble name! that's terrible! also you should not put your name on the map! this is public map not your own bookmark thing! stop it.
HUSSEIN JAMEEL (2021-07-05 04:21:09+00:00): Hello, I am from here and I know this city because I live in it and my account name is related to this city
Thank you for contacting us
,HUSSEIN JAMEEL
HUSSEIN JAMEEL (2021-07-05 04:34:10+00:00): Hello, there are a lot of incorrect places, in fact, all the names are wrong
You can go to Google Maps to check
user_11418917 (2021-07-05 05:27:54+00:00): Your name is Hussein Jameel Awad, this is your name that you put on the village and the roads in your area. this is not acceptable. this is your name not your village name. I'm also from Iraq so this won't fool me. also your profile picture have a qr code leads to a twitter page with your name, Hussein Jameel, so quit the nonsense and don't add spam again.
user_11418917 (2021-07-05 05:31:06+00:00): And every edit you make I will revert unless you promise you wont add spam again and won't add your name to the map.
HUSSEIN JAMEEL (2021-07-05 05:48:35+00:00): Well, since you are from Iraq, are there names in Iraq like 
صباع، عرب صيهود ، الخ.....
You can go to google to check
They are wrong names so I am from this place and I know the places well Second, what do you have to do with my profile picture? This is my account and I am free. You have the right to object only to the modifications I make.
Since you are an expert, why don't you edit yourself? 
If you need anything, you can contact me in person or via email
 Thanks!
yue_dongchen (2021-07-05 04:29:23+00:00): I assumed that "highway=footway" shouldn't be used for unpaved trails. I'll look into the details and possibly fix it with another changeset.
felipeeugenio (2021-07-05 12:50:22+00:00): Estimado. por favor especificar de qué se trata lo que está haciendo. vemos que mueve todas las calles de un lado para otro con imágenes satelitales que tienen un desplazamiento importante en la zona.
Adicionalmente, el tag building es para las estructuras, no para los recintos completos.
Respecto de los nombres de las plazas; estos tienen que ser los nombres oficiales, no las descripcione.
Le pedimos por favor tomar contacto con la comunidad, de lo contrario tendremos que rehacer todo lo que está cambiando.
saludos y gracias por su tiempo.
DUGA (2021-08-23 03:31:17+00:00): Are you sure that it is a driveway?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961483994#map=19/39.73498/-76.77274
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:47:09+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107416370
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:47:00+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107416919
SafetyIng (2021-07-05 07:18:24+00:00): Hey,
did you forget the driveway-tag?
neerdixi (2021-07-07 14:26:56+00:00): Hi SafetyIng,
Thanks for the feedback. I have now changed the road class to driveway as per your suggestion. Please look into the changeset #: 107571055 with modifications. 
Regards, 
neerdixi
osmviborg (2021-07-05 06:59:27+00:00): Selvom 'boardwalk' hører til gruppen 'bridge', kan betegnelsen fint bruges på steder hvor der ikke er en decideret bro. Stedet her er et godt eksempel.
AsgerFrank (2021-07-05 08:05:33+00:00): Tak!
- jeg havde i version 1 netop tagget stien som boardwalk, men i denne version 2 kommet til at overskrive det med layer-tilføjelsen.
Lee Carré (2021-07-05 09:40:20+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 🙂.
Awo (2021-07-07 03:50:09+00:00): sorry, it's almost automatic when I add trees. I correct.
An Araucaria araucana, an emblematic species of Chile, was added to the mapping.
Lee Carré (2021-07-22 15:06:54+00:00): Even simply just “add trees” would have been meaningful.
Arun Madhavan (2021-07-05 11:28:28+00:00): Can you give full name of the school including location
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107417587
radiotrefoil (2021-07-05 13:22:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits. Did you mean to put a park in the valley here?
radiotrefoil (2021-07-07 14:49:06+00:00): I have removed way 961491958.
syntex (2021-09-15 01:32:58+00:00): Te ścieżki nie zostały otwarte
HirschKauz (2021-07-05 07:56:29+00:00): Hi Spongebon,  
die Frage ob das mit dem Parkplatz verbinden korrekt ist, gab es auch im Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73150  
Grüße HirschKauz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107418893
eggie (2021-07-05 08:13:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 



Namens de OSM Community
Art van den Bergen (2021-07-05 10:04:47+00:00): Bedankt!
Enock4seth (2021-07-09 23:12:07+00:00): Imagery offset ignored. Compare and align with existing data, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961500252
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:46:49+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107419627
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:46:44+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107420383
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:46:31+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107421153
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:46:14+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107421686
Peilscheibe (2021-07-05 12:08:01+00:00): Hallo cmk23,

Du hast hier und an anderen Wegen kürzlich ein bicycle=yes hinzugefügt. Das ist nicht falsch, weil die ja dort fahren dürfen. 
In OSM hat sich ein hierarchisches System von sog. access-tags etabliert, die zusammen mit einigen Standardwerten die Benutzungsberechtigungen darstellen.
Dokumentiert ist das u.a. hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany und hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Das bedeutet, dass auf dem Weg hinter der Sommerhofensiedlung (highway=service) per Verkehrszeichen alle Verkehrsarten bis auf Kraftfahrzeuge erlaubt sind (motor_vehicle=no).
Damit ist bereits alles gesagt, weitere tags braucht es nicht.
Würde man ständig alles explizit attributieren, müsste man ja an alle normalen Wohnstraßen foot=yes, bicycle=yes, horse=yes, Elektrokleinstfahrzeuge=yes usw. dranschreiben. Das will man nicht, deswegen die Standardwerte.

Wenn Du dazu noch Fragen hast, nur zu. Hilfsbereit ist auch immer die Stuttgarter OSM-Community, die findest Du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stuttgart/Stammtisch
http://lists.openstreetmap.de/mailman/listinfo/stuttgart

Grüße, P.
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:46:09+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107422355
iWowik (2021-07-06 09:13:56+00:00): Здравствуйте!
1) access=no это значит никому нельзя, даже жильцам.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8894264778/history
2) addr:housenumber=2а
Выполняйте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о нумерации домов
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.9D.D1.83.D0.BC.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.BE.D0.B2


Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:46:03+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107423068
aweech (2021-07-06 19:03:46+00:00): Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. Why did you decide to limit the beach to that extent? It currently goes out much further than that. The wiki page says that either mapping to the high water line or low water line is fine, though, if we mapped this beach to the high water line, it'd be gone entirely. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbeach
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:45:55+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107423275
jimmyhendrix (2021-07-05 07:46:27+00:00): Jetzt bist du mir zuvor gekommen.. War auch gerade im Moment dabei es einzutragen :-)
tux67 (2021-07-05 07:57:34+00:00): Jaa, wir sollten unseren Schichtbetrieb (besser) abstimmen ;-) .. den Blitzer konnte ich nicht so ohne weiteres ausmachen - an der Stelle wo ich die Note gesetzt habe steht was Säulenartiges .. aber Mapillary gib's an der Stelle nicht ...
jimmyhendrix (2021-07-05 08:08:59+00:00): Ich bin dort noch vor etwa 3 Wochen ,aus östlicher Richtung kommend, langgefahren. Meine mich zu erinnern, dass auf der linken Fahrbahnseite eine Blitzeranlage stand. Eine dieser modernen Säulen. Sie stand eher am Ortsausgang, aber wo genau, kann ich leider nicht mehr sagen. Aber anhand des Schattenwurfs im Luftbild könnte es gut zwischen Hs-Nr. 39 und 41 gewesen sein.
tux67 (2021-07-05 08:22:58+00:00): Ja, das was das Ding, das ich auch meinte .. aber ohne so halbwegs sicher zu sein wollte ich das nicht eintragen. Was dafü spricht ist, daß es auf den ESRI Luftbildern noch nicht existiert.
DP24PH (2021-07-25 04:36:32+00:00): WARNING! The supposed missing road in Washington Place (with green shade) is actually a CLOSED/CORDONED portion, and it is off-limits to all motor vehicles. Kindly verify first to avoid navigation, legal issues with the HOA.
dee_ksha (2021-07-26 08:25:33+00:00): Hi Paul,
Thanks for letting us know and also for fixing these roads.  
In Fact We have added the road based on the satellite image where we could not find the closed road nor barriers. Refer: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/46376220/126957496-1fab111d-a0a1-4d9f-86bd-cf5dc4de2d28.png
Thanks again for writing to us! Happy Mapping.

Regards
Deeksha
DP24PH (2021-07-27 05:40:30+00:00): It looks like the aerial imagery got outdated since the locals (as of July 2021) may introduce changes to the traffic scheme that requires local/resident mapping validation. In the image link above, the previous roadway got placed way back before 2020 (pre-pandemic) where the construction vehicles are allowed to pass-thru instead of the main roadway (outpost/gate). I'll DM you regarding this outdated imagery issue.
5R-MFT (2021-07-05 08:00:06+00:00): Esto es un information=board?
Toni Serra (2021-07-06 21:20:45+00:00): Pues si, aquí hay un panel informativo, exactamente detalla una ruta de BTT. Añado notas en mis rutas y luego en casa lo acabo de completar.
5R-MFT (2021-07-07 08:44:30+00:00): Muy bien. Lo ví de casualidad y no sabia si en maps.me no se podia poner mas información o quizas no lo sabias.   Justo en zonas donde pasan pocas personas de OSM todos los datos son valiosos. Perdona la molestia.
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:45:43+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri 的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107424133
Supaplex (2021-07-06 06:38:54+00:00): 不好意思，OpenStreetMap 不大適合收這種事件性與統計性質資料，仍是以地理資料為主。如果需要 GIS 平台來視覺化呈現資料的話也許用 Google My Map 或是 Esri  的圖台
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107424574
nevw (2021-07-05 10:39:35+00:00): Hi
Once the roadway construction is completed, the “construction=residential” tag can be removed. That information is already included in the highway=residential tag.
nmt96 (2021-07-05 14:35:44+00:00): Thanks, got it fixed!
nevw (2021-07-05 10:35:41+00:00): Hi
It is best to not extend the residential area to the roadway centreline nodes. Alignment with the side of the road enables easier editing for future mapping.
nmt96 (2021-07-05 14:34:16+00:00): Hi, thank you, I will fix it
topius (2021-07-05 08:32:33+00:00): Hi there. Great you are updating the maps. Village names please without the "village" at the end, just the names.
GinaroZ (2021-10-13 17:20:11+00:00): Why did you change https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4457628592/history to a man_made=communications_tower?
Theo Asselman (2021-10-16 07:02:41+00:00): Hi GinaroZ, when I recognize a 'man_made = tower' on the photo's I change it in the more appropriate 'man_made = communication_tower'. Because that's what it is. Mind you, JOSM offers me 'Big Communication Tower' and I now see that OSM skips the 'big'..
GinaroZ (2021-10-18 23:13:11+00:00): Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately that tag is pretty useless as it's a bit subjective and not clearly defined. It's also only used about 2,000 times instead of the much more popular tower+tower:type=communication. :)
canfe (2021-07-05 14:36:15+00:00): Solo per curiosità ed ora i Rivotti dove sono?
andgiors (2021-07-05 15:57:28+00:00): i Rivotti sono l'insieme di case sparse che comprendono la chiesa i piccolo agglomerato a valle. Le inserirò a breve
canfe (2021-07-05 19:18:11+00:00): Grazie!!
CAI Stabia (2021-07-05 08:41:17+00:00): Fixme: La posizione della sorgente non è corretta, è da posizionare più in alto
andygol (2021-12-29 18:52:49+00:00): Шановний RADABANK

Від імені учасників спільноти OpenStreetMap в Україні дякую за вашу зацікавленість у використанні проєкту та зроблений внесок 👍. 

Однак ви припустились кількох помилок (не критичних) які я виправив для цього відділення тут https://osmcha.org/changesets/115533116. Ви можете перейти за посиланням та порівняти відмінності 😉. 

Було б гарно, як би зробити подібні вправлення й для інших ваших відділень по всій Україні. 

Якщо у вас будуть якісь запитання, ви можете звертатись безпосередньо до мене, чи в загальні канали спілкування української спільноти ОСМ. https://openstreetmap.community/?map=50.03780,33.21779&zoom=7.00
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107426521
Mike Baggaley (2021-07-11 18:45:26+00:00): Hi, is there some reason why half the roundabout is now tagged as was:roundabout? Please either remove the roundabout tag from the whole roundabout or revert.

Cheers,
Mike
Lightswitchr (2021-07-11 18:47:40+00:00): I must have missed that tag and didn't remove it. The roundabout is definitely there I drove around it earlier!

Thanks for the headsup.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-07-05 12:03:24+00:00): Hi! Can you explain what was the purpose of this changeset? The geometry was correctly aligned with precise aerial imagery. Please refrain from modyfing data if you are not sure it is correct and up to date. I had to fix it. Thanks!
Naren_PR (2021-07-05 12:26:18+00:00): Can you please generate route on this and confirm. I didn't still complete allignment
Naren_PR (2021-07-05 15:47:43+00:00): I m trying to fix the routing between these lat/longs Please help me out if u can
Origin:45.36771,-73.51993
Destination: 45.36568,-73.52007
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-07-05 16:54:14+00:00): Which routing engine causes a problem? Which app? Thanks!
Naren_PR (2021-07-06 05:50:49+00:00): I m trying here itself. Please check this screenshot for reference. I believe there exists node issue. Somehow same node is shared by multiple links resulting incorrect routing
https://i.imgur.com/xHfNijF.png
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-07-06 11:15:17+00:00): I don't see any problem in the data. can you confirm that the routing engine uses the latest data? the defaut routing can take months to update the data. I am currently without access to a computer until monday. I'll check then if I can test and fix the problem you are having.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-07-12 17:10:42+00:00): It looks like it is fixed. I tried the same route on openstreetmap directions using car (OSRM and grasshopper) and it works well.
Warin61 (2021-07-06 07:08:06+00:00): Relationship for South Bunbury administration boundary role changed back to 'outer'. The role 'inner' is an error made in this changeset.
imagoiq (2021-07-06 20:42:31+00:00): Bonjour,

Top toutes ces modifications sur Lausanne ! J'ai juste remarqué par hasard une petite erreur à Ouchy. Lorsqu'il n'y a pas de nom pour un endroit, dans StreetComplete, il faut choisir "Autres réponses" pui "Il n'y a pas de panneau". Cela va rajouter "noname=yes". Sinon comme ici, le kiosque s'appelle "aucun". Je vais faire le changement.

Meilleures salutations
Vincèn (2021-07-09 08:36:58+00:00): Salut
avec plaisir pour les modifs ;) je vais essayer de garder le rythme !
Merci pour la précision pour les lieux sans nom je vais faire comme ça alors et désolé pour les erreurs précédentes !
Il faut aussi que j'éclaircisse un soucis avec StreetComplete que j'avais jamais eu avant: le sens des escaliers....
a bientôt ;)
literan (2021-07-05 17:44:14+00:00): и зачем вы это сделали, соединили мост с дорогой, проходящей под ним? Откатил.