piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
svbruyss (2018-12-04 14:55:07+00:00): RSV en PRSA verwijzen naar de respectievelijke gewestelijke (Vlaamse) en provinciale structuurplannen waarin de functionele hiërarchie van de (grotere) wegen is vastgelegd. Uiteraard kan dit niet 1-op-1 overgenomen worden op OSM. Dit is niet mijn bedoeling. Soms wijzig ik wel een categorie wanneer de afwijking tussen beiden zeer groot is. Dit wijst vaak op een manco in de bestaande OSM-data. Voorbeeld: als een weg in de structuurplannen slechts van lokaal belang is en in OSM als 'primary' staat, zal ik deze één stapje downgraden naar 'secondary'. Uiteraard zonder het geheel van een consistente hiërarchie in het OSM-wegennetwerk te verliezen.
De Noorderlaan en Scheldelaan lijken me te voldoen aan de criteria voor een 'primary' weg. Enkel voor het noordelijke einde van de Noorderlaan ("Kruisweg"/"Antwerpsebaan") twijfelde ik wat.
escada (2018-12-04 15:04:02+00:00): Bedankt, voor de toelichting. Een goede werkwijze lijkt het mij, en als u rekening houdende met de OSM criteria, de wijzing doorvoert ga ik ervan uit dat het ook correct is.

Ik had via-via een opmerking over deze changeset gekregen van iemand die ook twijfelde aan de wijziging maar niet zeker was dat het verkeerd is.

bedankt voor uw bijdrage !
mavl (2018-12-25 00:37:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:03:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:48:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:56:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Phyks (2018-12-04 15:04:11+00:00): Bonjour,

Je réagis à la demande de relecture. Je vois juste un petit problème dans les horaires d'ouverture. Je pense que la valeur correcte devrait être

Tu-Sa 09:00-12:30,14:30-19:00; Su 09:30-12:30

Voir notamment cet outil en ligne pour évaluer facilement la valeur de ce champs et corriger les erreurs éventuelles : https://openingh.ypid.de/evaluation_tool/.

Bonne journée,
escada (2018-12-16 20:51:33+00:00): teruggedraait: ongeoorloofde import
mavl (2019-02-24 17:35:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Stahlmann (2018-12-04 22:37:37+00:00): Danke für die Änderung. Die Villa hätte ich nicht ansatzweise so gut taggen können.
PantherStrix (2018-12-05 12:52:00+00:00): Danke für die Lorbeeren. Ich hab mich auf's Denkmalschutztagging in Potsdam spezialisiert ;-)
Gehe dabei Straßenweise vor, aber wenn es Hinweise gibt, dann ziehe ich das schnell mal vor.

Gruß
TheBlackMan
Stahlmann (2018-12-05 14:16:21+00:00): Doch, gute Changesets müssen mal gelobt werden. Und das Ergebnis war einfach umfassender, als ich es selbst für Berlin/Potsdam erwartet hatte.

Ich selber komme aus dem ländlichen Raum, wo ich meine Region mit vielleicht 2-3 anderen Mappern teile, da ist einfach die Qualität des Taggens in der Fläche i. d. R. unter dem berliner Durchschnitt.
gabro00 (2019-01-17 13:15:08+00:00): Mórahalom és Kisújszállás közt ugye nincs kivilágítva a bringaút? Kicseréltem a lit=yes taget no-ra. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66395544
Nmxosm (2018-12-04 16:30:02+00:00): Ich hatte zwar gelesen, dass das erst ab 9. Dezember gilt, aber egal. Cool, dass das noch jemand bemerkt hat. ;-)

VlG Nmxosm
timmito (2018-12-04 16:55:41+00:00): Ja, die Umbenennung ist anlässlich des Fahrplanwechsels am 9. Dezember, aber die neuen Schilder hängen schon. https://www.frankfurt.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=8653&_ffmpar[_id_inhalt]=34757783
Nmxosm (2018-12-04 18:32:42+00:00): Beschilderung vor Ort schlägt Zeitung. :D
Constable (2019-04-27 10:13:47+00:00): Ciao Raffaele, sembra sia stato tu a creare questo edificio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652347352/history , occhio però che quello non è il Pronto Soccorso. Rimuovo il nome "PS".
Per favore prima di apportare modifiche assicurati della veridicità delle informazioni che aggiungi. Grazie :)
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Филиппок (2018-12-26 16:11:10+00:00): Ну как то 52-ой должен выезжать с Карасу.Или он мимо церкви проедет не останавливаясь.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:35:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
SK53 (2018-12-04 14:57:27+00:00): Welcome and many thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). 

As I presume this is an area I know, I'd just like to check my assumption that this is a public bridleway. It's not marked as such on OSM, but the original contributor is a very active member of The Ramblers, so its usually a safe bet. However we can actually make that information explicit with additional tags (designation=public_bridleway) so I  thought I'd just take the opportunity of your edit to ask. 

BTW this map distinguishes between paths/trails/tracks marked as rights of way and other paths https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=14&lat=52.74037&lon=-0.69545. If you look near Scalford N of Melton you can see just how much information can be added.

Best wishes,

Jerry (aka SK53)
Estelle Slegers Helsen (2018-12-04 16:07:02+00:00): Hello Jerry,
Just started using OpenStreetMap, so I'm still learning. Living in the Market Overton area since end September, but almost out for a hike every day. Yes, there is still a lot to add :-) Hmmm... bit by bit, no? If you have suggestions how to tacke things, please go ahead. Always eager to learn. Regards, Estelle
SK53 (2018-12-04 17:44:00+00:00): Hi Estelle,

Great to hear it. Your bit of Rutland certainly looks as if there's plenty more to add. As you say every little bit helps, for walking I think field boundaries (hedges, walls etc) are probably most useful & you get to see the detail appear on the map.

Many of us find exploring paths to add data to OSM a great way to get to know a bit of countryside. I've written a few blog posts about it which may give more of a feel of what others are up to: http://sk53-osm.blogspot.com/search/label/footpaths. Also this talk by dudone provides a good overview of his approach in the Peak District.

If I you have a specific query or want more advice either send me a private message through the OSM site or email at SK53 dot osm at gmail dot com.

Cheers,

Jerry
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
andrewwiseman (2018-12-11 23:35:54+00:00): Hi again, can you explain the changes to this segment? Why secondary from trunk? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639780017
FS Patagonia (2018-12-15 01:03:12+00:00): Hola,
Por la manera en que expresás tu opinión (lenguaje,etc.), cualquier persona supone que vos ni siquiera recorriste en tu vida los caminos que marcás como incorrectos. 
Como el nombre de mi perfil lo indica, pertenezco a la región patagónica, y mas precisamente a la región del alto valle; Por lo que yo tengo conocimiento sobre el estado de los caminos y sus clasificaciones. Si no te enteraste, desde la localidad de Chichinales hasta la ciudad de Cipolletti, sobre la Ruta Nacional 22 se está construyendo una AUTOPISTA de dos carriles por sentido y cruces elevados. En el mapa indiqué el tramo que actualmente es una autopista; y en los "Desvíos" se indica que son salidas de autopista, ya que esos pequeños tramos son desvíos que están provisoriamente por la obra de los puentes. Si no sos de la zona (o más precisamente de Argentina), por favor no edites datos que son dados por un contribuyente que es de la zona y que CONOCE LOS CAMINOS. Desde ya, gracias por leer. Espero haber sido claro y breve.
muralito (2018-12-15 02:01:21+00:00): Estimado:

De los caminos podrás tener un excelente conocimiento de su estado, nadie lo ha puesto en duda, pero has mostrado no estar al tanto de como se clasifican las vias en OpenStreetMap en este cambio y en otros varios cambios más, ademas de que se te pregunto varias veces antes de volver atras tus aportes, ya que fueron discutidos por varios otros colaboradores.

En este caso puntual la RN22 no cumple de manera alguna los requisitos necesarios para clasificarla como motorway. Por favor chequealos de nuevo y seguramente lo vas a entender.

Por otro lado estas elevando la jerarquia de muchas rutas y calles por toda Argentina, cosas que tampoco van con los criterios que la comunidad tiene acordado, y has demorado en presentar respuestas a cambios en vias importantes del pais.

Saludos.
axline (2018-12-21 12:01:44+00:00): Скажите, пожалуйста, каким источником данных Вы пользовались при внесении этих правок? В пакете присутствуют явные заимствования из карт Яндекса (с характерными ошибками), что является нарушением правил проекта.
mavl (2018-12-24 17:13:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
BCNorwich (2018-12-04 18:42:22+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

May I just point out the bridleway, Way:477705335, you recently amended the line of, crosses over Way:477707698 without joining it. I think there might also be missing bridges where the Way:477705335 crosses ditches. 

Regards Bernard
Estelle Slegers Helsen (2018-12-05 11:04:21+00:00): Hi Bernard,
I there an "easy" way to find the items (by their id-number) when working in the Edit mode?
Regards,
Estelle
BCNorwich (2018-12-05 11:55:50+00:00): Hello Estelle,

The easiest way from comments like this, or when you are given your changeset number is to just look at the list of ways below. Click on the way and it opens the link. Or what I do is right click and open it in a new tab.

Only slightly more advanced, look at the browser link for this page, it ends as /changeset/65163500   that's the link to this changeset page. Insert the changeset number you wish to look at, bingo.  For Way:477705335 the link is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477705335

So just open any openstreetmap.org and amend the link address to add either "/way" or "/node" or "/changeset" then the number and go.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2018-12-07 19:20:22+00:00): Hi, problems now repaired, removed duplication, added bridges and made gaps in hedges.

Regards Bernard
Phyks (2018-12-04 16:26:43+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue !

Je réagis à la demande de relecture. Le champs "opening_hours" a un format bien précis, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours.

Il y a un service en ligne pour aider à tester la syntaxe : http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/.

Ici, la syntaxe correcte devrait être

Mo-Sa 09:30-19:30

Bonne journée,
mboeringa (2019-12-15 20:37:50+00:00): Hi Lucadelu,

As part of this changeset, you added two nodes named "Snow pit" with a tag of tourism=attraction. I am at loss as to what these represent. In the same area on Ischia, there are other strange tourism=attraction features, like a "Wine Cistern". I would really refrain from using an important tag like tourism=attraction for just anything. Tag it with what it is. If these represent places where people can get water along some route, use one of the drinking water related tags OSM has on offer. And don't give a name to it if it doesn't have a real name. Enter a possible description in the description=x tag.
lucadelu (2019-12-19 05:22:19+00:00): Hi mboeringa,
it seems strange to me that I added these nodes, I just worked on setting a new hiking route. Could you share the id of the nodes?
mboeringa (2019-12-20 19:09:14+00:00): Hi Lucadelu,

Sorry if I got the history of the objects wrong. It may be that you only recycled / re-used the nodes in a relation. Anyway, this is a link to one of these mysterious objects tagged with the name "Snow pit". The others are nearby in the same forest patch just west of the "Capo dell' Uomo" and also tagged tourism=attraction, and with names like "Doppelhaus", "Wine Cistern" etc. Can you verify these objects are real?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6116134622#map=18/40.72903/13.88757
lucadelu (2020-01-17 22:49:46+00:00): Hi  mboeringa, no sorry but I'm not able to verify.
I have no idea what they could be..
escada (2018-12-16 20:22:48+00:00): "Corrected" relations ?

waarom heb je dan verkeerde rout nummers gebruikt ? Gelieve geen routes te importeren vanaf knooppuntnet.
BHiko (2018-12-18 12:31:55+00:00): Knooppuntnet gebruikt alleen OSM data. Ik wijzigde alleen wanneer knooppuntnet een fout meldt, zoals inconsistentie tussen node rwn_ref en relation note nummers. Hier moet ik voorzichtiger mee zijn.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
BCNorwich (2018-12-04 18:59:15+00:00): Hi, footpath section Way: 477710027 is actually a duplication, the footpath is drawn exactly on top of an existing section of highway.

Regards Bernard.
Estelle Slegers Helsen (2018-12-05 11:01:19+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Thx.
Estelle
BCNorwich (2018-12-05 12:01:01+00:00): Hi, No problem, the duplication is still there, can you see it? If not I could separate the two ways so you can easily see the problem.

Regards Bernard
Estelle Slegers Helsen (2018-12-05 16:03:34+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Nope I don't see it :-(
Please separate.
Thx
Estelle
BCNorwich (2018-12-05 19:48:11+00:00): Sure, ways now separated for you to see duplication. It's the short section of footpath that was on top of  Braeside, near Cottesmore Road.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2018-12-07 19:21:28+00:00): Hi, duplication now removed.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
escada (2018-12-16 20:46:01+00:00): gelieve geen import van routes van geopunt te maken aub
viloan (2018-12-04 15:47:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
escada (2018-12-16 20:55:09+00:00): Nog een ongeoorloofde import, gelieve de situatie terug te zetten naar de vorige status
mueschel (2018-12-08 11:28:26+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "Полезная длина пути (м)" to several rails here. This is not a common tag - could you search for one? E.g. a simple 'length' could be appropriate. 

Cheers, Jan
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-25 07:31:27+00:00): Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5416251 ?
mavl (2019-02-24 17:35:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
viloan (2018-12-04 16:30:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Tomas Straupis (2018-12-05 08:11:57+00:00): Pelkėms (natural=wetland) reikia nurodyti ir potipį:
wetland=marsh - atvira pelkė be medžių (ar su pavieniais medžiais)
wetland=swamp - raistas miške (daug medžių)
wetland=reedbed - esminiai/dideli meldai ar apžėlęs vandens krantas, šitie plotai turi būti tik virš natural=water ar landuse=reservoir
escada (2018-12-16 20:43:17+00:00): reverted, illegal import
JochenOSM (2018-12-04 16:38:16+00:00): Kommentar ist falsch, richtig ist "Miltenberg, Hausnummern Arnouviller Ring und Winterheltstraße ergänzt"
escada (2018-12-16 20:52:45+00:00): heb ongeoorloofde import stukje teruggedraait
viloan (2018-12-04 16:57:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-12-04 17:01:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
felipeeugenio (2018-12-04 18:57:28+00:00): Hello
You are duplicating every toll gantry. why?
regards
LemonEarlMapper (2018-12-04 21:22:48+00:00): Thanks for reaching out. Multiple structures exist at this location which is why I added multiple tags, one for each structure. The wiki was unclear on if both should be added but I agree only one should. I’ll go back though and remove duplicates.
felipeeugenio (2018-12-05 01:02:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your response. I did some changes of my own.
The reason of the two gantriesi s the lack of space for the cameras in charge of capturing the rear plates. But they are both part of the same point of collection.
And in some parts you added the gantry in the lateral road.
Although, the adition of most of the gantries is a very good information to be had. I wonder why it was missing. Thanks for that.
LemonEarlMapper (2018-12-05 23:51:55+00:00): Thanks.
eteb3 (2018-12-31 15:46:15+00:00): I assume DaveF had this in mind:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fhrs:rating?uselang=en-GB
Map-Peter (2019-03-16 19:07:37+00:00): Hallo KSMedia, 
wir erfassen bei OSM fast nie Wege als Fläche (ausgenommen sind z.B. Fußgängerzonen - obwohl auch dort zusätzlich Wege durch die Fläche gezogen werden sollten, damit navigiert werden kann). 
Deshalb werde ich die von dir gezeichnete "flächige Wendestelle" ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652411178 ) gleich wieder entfernen - der Punkt ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/32056660 ) reicht aus. 
Gruß Peter