piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2016-12-13 08:19:19+00:00): Можно обозначать как угодно. Если известно, где находится здание заправки, то желательно его обозначить. Если неизвестно, можно обойтись одной точкой. Главное, чтобы один объект был обозначен один раз. Вообще, есть правило "Один объект на местности - один объект в базе данных".  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Один_объект_-_один_элемент_OSM]  
То есть точку интереса желательно отметить отдельной точкой в OSM. Но в случае, когда точка интереса занимает здание полностью допускается ставить теги точки интереса на здание (магазин занимает всё здание, заправка занимает всё здание и тому подобное).  
  
Про название здания я так и не понял. Если это название управляющей компании здания, то нужно использовать тег operator вместо name [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:operator]. Если это название компании, которая располагается в этом здании (и занимает здание целиком), то нужно добавить какой-нибудь тег. Например, office [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:office].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
luiswoo (2016-12-14 18:15:57+00:00): "товары для дома" это точно остановка общественного транспорта.
luiswoo (2016-12-14 18:16:12+00:00): ?
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:06:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_3957715 (2016-12-12 16:27:47+00:00): Нарушение правил о обьяснение. Таким обьяснение вы неуважаете колег по цеху- Во вторых нужно писать :нарушение инструкции из Вики , нарушение договоренностей на форуме , нарушени е писем из Главного оффиса.
user_3957715 (2016-12-12 16:30:40+00:00): Также если я пересмотрю правку - я буду знать что не нужно делать . А так посмотрел : да не верно  а, что непонятно . И буду и дальше делать ошибки.
Владимир К (2016-12-12 18:03:24+00:00): Что не нужно делать  вы прекрасно можете увидеть сравнив версию до и после моей правки. если сомневаетесь что я прав, можете проверить вики и в конце концов спросить здесь в комментариях. Я исправляю много ошибок за многими пользователями и писать каждый раз что конкретно мне не хватает терпения и мотивации, потому что отвечают из всех людей процентов 5-10.
Так что ваши обвинения, еще и про какой-то главный офис абсолютно не уместны
mapper999 (2016-12-12 19:37:29+00:00): Hallo Felix,
addr:housename ist nur für postalische Hausnamen gedacht, wie sie z.B. in ländlichen Regionen in Großbrittanien verwendet werden, in Deutschland sind diese jedoch nicht üblich. Ich habe keine Ortskenntnis, aber eventuell handelt es sich bei den Namen hier um lokal (z.B. Lehrer/Schüler) verwendete Namen (loc_name) oder es sind einfach nur Beschreibungen (description).
Viele Grüße
mapper999
Felix Schütt (2016-12-19 10:12:40+00:00): Hallo mapper9999,

habe nachgefragt - ich war falsch. Der richtige Weg wäre:

loc_name=Sporthallen
ref= Haus 25

Danke für den Kommentar. Werde die Sachen ändern.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:18:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:06:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
santamariense (2016-12-12 15:36:05+00:00): Bem vindo ao OSM. Essa foi boa. Estilizou o nome com uma 🚲. Esse caractere/simbolo não tem utilidade nenhuma. Uma que ninguém vai pesquisar por ele. E outra que é bem provável que ele (🚲) seja excluído pelo primeiro que se propor a editar o local. :)
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:07:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 01:01:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:58:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
opendcc (2016-12-12 12:49:22+00:00): Hallo,

was steht da? Ein Wegkreuz? Dann bitte als historic=wayside_cross taggen. 

Eine Kapelle: dann muß zu place_of_worship auch noch die Religion.

Danke
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:07:25+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:57:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
pyram (2016-12-14 22:53:01+00:00): Hallo gsperb,
ich bin jetzt etwas irritiert, warum Du die Haltestellen "Am Wegfeld" zuerst irgendwie mit einer Nummer versehen hast. Die hatte ich vor ein paar Tagen nach Ortseinsicht richtig umbenannt. Jetzt heißen die nach Deiner Änderung angeblich HST5 usw.
Welche Quellle sagt denn so etwas? Vor Ort steht das jedenfalls nicht. Und ich gehe eigentlich davon aus, dass das, was vor Ort auf dem Haltestellenschild steht, für OSM (und deren Nutzer) der relevante Name ist.
pyram (2016-12-16 17:03:14+00:00): Bezüglich der PN:
Nein, den Namen des Busbahnhofes hat niemand gelöscht. Versehentlich hatte ich allerdings mit dem railway=station auch das amenity=bus_station gelöscht. Das war von mir nicht gewollt.
Ja, bei Thon hatte ich den Fehler nicht behoben, weil ich nicht alles machen kann und will. In dieser Thematik wird mir zu oft "herumgepfuscht", wie Du neulich selber beim user Weltstaat festgestellt hattest. ÖPNV hat für mich auch daher keine Priorität.

Allerdings finde ich trotzdem, dass es falsch ist, eine Bezeichnung "HST" zu erfinden, die vor Ort nicht vorhanden. Wenn Du der Meinung bist, dass die eigentlichen Namen stören und nur die Nummern interessant wären, dann sollte man die doch eher in ref=* eintragen.
Namenswiederholungen zu löschen, nur damit die Karte schöner aussieht ist "Mappen für den Renderer". Da sollte doch eher der Renderer auf die Wiederholung des Namens verzichten. Das würde bei einem Busbahnhof ja funktionieren, da einfach nur Haltepunktsnamen innerhalb der Fläche unterdrückt werden müssten...
aceman444 (2020-04-03 05:58:24+00:00): Hi, surely the site is not called "radar site" in the local language. So please do not put such descriptions into the 'name' tag but maybe into 'note' and a 'fixme' tag so that somebody can add the proper name later. Thanks
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:57:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:26:35+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:57:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:57:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:07:31+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Commodoortje (2016-12-12 22:38:32+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-12 22:51:54+00:00): Ik zie dat je het huisnummer 42 hebt aangebracht, maar volgens de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) is het huisnummer 41, en deze is aanwezig op het pand.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ukao1d3c1sinqdk/2016-12-12_23-37-03.png?raw=1
Ook de website van de scouts geeft nummer 41 als huisnummer.
http://www.ariens-buette.nl/index.php/contact
Ik heb inmiddels de door jou aangevulde info verwijdert, en heb ook de POI voor de scouting aangebracht.
Commodoortje (2016-12-12 22:53:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272226962
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-26 19:58:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2556650  - can you look at it? Sorry for bothering about an ancient edit but maybe you are still nearby
FrançoiseR (2021-03-04 11:19:45+00:00): Merci du signalement, c'est corrigé :  erreur de saisie pour foot = yes  (peut-être pas très utile sur un "footway" mais  ce "block" a une réelle utilité pour éviter l'accès à la traverse où la circulation automobile est interdite)
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:57:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
maxerickson (2017-10-26 01:04:00+00:00): I happened to download a small area that included buildings added in this changeset and noticed that several garages and small outbuildings were tagged as building=house.

Spot checking nearby buildings, it is easy to find more. I guess they could use a clean up and review.

Also, personally I don't bother putting addr: info on small outbuildings, but I guess that can be a style choice.
Thundercel (2019-09-30 15:43:53+00:00): Corrigido o milestone km 14 da ES-060. O Km é o 19. Não sei o que isso implicana parada de onibus.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
SomeoneElse (2016-12-20 22:14:43+00:00): Isn't "Shop 'n' Drive" the convenience store brand used by Esso?
vwJim (2016-12-20 22:56:42+00:00): When I drove past there was no Esso branding.

A Google search of Shop 'n' Drive showed up the company behind Shop 'n' Drive have being buying up locations from Esso etc
mavl (2017-10-21 06:00:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:56:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
Supaplex (2016-12-12 15:08:47+00:00): 那是什麼呢？
weans1975 (2016-12-12 15:19:24+00:00): 該點原為類似有應公廟，現已改建，是否仍為有應公廟，待確認？但非雙張廍保天宮。保天宮應該是地圖右下那間廟才是。
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:56:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
TomH (2016-12-12 19:28:09+00:00): Since when did we map "speculative" anything?
Russ (2016-12-13 11:19:42+00:00): Happy to have this discussion and revert these changes if necessary. My take on it:
There's always some level of inaccuracy with undersea (and underground) objects. These are features which we'll never be able to directly survey, and I suspect we'll never be able to get hold of accurate maps for themajority as exact locations tend to be kept secret. Even the parts we do have maps for have accuracy in the kilometers at best. So where do we draw the line?
In my view, the main interest with submarine cables is where they land at each end - this is something we can survey and determine from open sources. For that reason, I think the speculative routes make more sense than cables which suddenly end mid-ocean.

Currently these objects are not rendered on the main map, and I think it's unlikely they will be. So I'd argue that it's better for these features to be less accurate but more complete.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:00:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
Firefishy (2016-12-12 14:49:34+00:00): Nice first edit. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The aerial imagery is from the City of Cape Town. I collected it a few months back, it was flown in 2015.
DeonVDW (2016-12-12 14:55:52+00:00): Thanks! :) I live in the area and thought it would be nice to have an updated map.
woodpeck (2016-12-12 18:10:04+00:00): There are two problems with this. First of all, you must not import data into OSM without following our import guidelines which mandate that you discuss the import before you act. Second, you must not import data that is "free except for commercial use", because the license that OSM itself uses allows commercial use, hence the "noncommerical" restriction of the original licensor cannot be kept. This import needs to be removed again. Can you do it, or would you like help?
fredi_alf (2016-12-13 14:10:57+00:00): I will revert back to previous.
Sorry.
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:45:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:56:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:04:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44432937 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44347271 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:53:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:53:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
Basstoelpel (2022-05-16 18:51:20+00:00): Hallo gjergjde,

da, wo Du den Parkplatz hingeschoben hast, die Betriebsfläche einer Spedition.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
Nakaner-repair (2017-01-12 13:19:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 45103626.
afishler (2016-12-12 14:42:48+00:00): ההערה בטעות. זהו מעבר רגלי אפשרי בתוך נחל רחף, עד המפל הגבוה
SomeoneElse (2016-12-16 16:00:10+00:00): It would be really helpful here if the bounding box for two changes didn't include about a quarter of the planet, as previously mentioned on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39721595.
Best Regards,
Andy
ediyes (2016-12-16 19:57:01+00:00): Hey Andy,

Thanks for noticing this, we have a problem with the to-fix  plugin, right now we are working to resolve this bug  here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
dgitto (2016-12-12 15:13:57+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto in OSM.
Ricordati di evitare le abbreviazioni (se conosci i nomi completi)
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:49:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:52:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
BeKri (2016-12-13 02:59:46+00:00): Servus,
neu bei OSM und schon gut dabei, sehr schön. Was mir ausfällt ist dass die Garagenumrisse a bisserl "unrechtwinklig" daherkommen. Da Du JOSM benutzt möchte ich Dich auf "Werkzeuge -> Form rechtwinklig machen" oder Kurzform, die Q-Taste aufmerksam machen. Umriss auswählen, Q drücke und alles ist "lecker" rechtwinklig. geht aber nur bei wirklich rechtwinkligen Umrissen, nix mit Schrägen oder Rundungen.
Gruss und happy tagging derBeKri
muralito (2016-12-14 22:30:56+00:00): Tene en cuenta que poner el building=* a toda la parcela y no solo donde efectivamente este construido hace aparecer una zona chata pareja en al mapa en los mapas 3D, sobre todo si el building:levels o building:height no esta.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44151319, 44105238, 44127540, 44117498, 44095323, 44090371, 44115857, 44142301, 44115747, 44095990, 44076764, 44151536, 44103719, 44076948, 44086754, 44142057, 44077143, 44088709, 44090031, 44117920, 44147496, 44148457, 44116945, 44089731, 44117231, 44160662, 44151194, 44103294, 44162807, 44049218, 44146868, 44120379, 44086463, 44105435, 44118548, 44075180, 44095678, 44139231, 44127700, 44119854, 44076363, 44139511, 44149374, 44120597, 44117738, 44085388, 44049801, 44076535, 44160883, 44118030, 44149188, 44159984, 44147074, 44119479, 44147291, 44118907, 44127096, 44149593, 44139786, 44150655.
DD1GJ (2016-12-12 20:10:58+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Was ist die Quelle Deiner Änderung? Eigenes lokales Wissen oder firmeneintrag.de ?

Dieses Portal untersagt in seinem Impressum ausdrücklich die Übernahme in andere elektronische Medien sowie andere Internet-Objekte und sollte daher keinesfalls verwendet, erwähnt oder verlinkt werden.
Reinhard Gillo (2016-12-12 21:26:44+00:00): Hallo allerseits, das ist in erster Linie eigenes lokales Wissen. Ich wollte es nur noch einmal durch irgendeinen (keinen bestimmten) Interneteintrag untermauert haben. Denn sonst könnte ja jeder schreiben, wie die Bäckerei heißt. Ich dachte nur, wenn die Fleischerei Stöber um die Ecke einen solchen namentlichen Eintrag hat, dann sollte das die Bäckerei auch. Mir ist es letztendlich egal, denn ich habe zu der Bäckerei keine persönliche Beziehung.
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:48:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:52:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
VA00 (2021-07-29 18:50:23+00:00): Czy tu naprawdę jest kran z wodą do picia? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4551100553
Adam_Piszczek (2021-07-29 21:58:22+00:00): po problemie,widze że kontrola
Commodoortje (2016-12-12 22:55:46+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.