piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:50:11+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:54:48+00:00): I am correcting the toponyms. there is nothing to discuss.
corfede (2018-09-11 12:58:25+00:00): Perchè aggiungi edifici che non esistono? Ciao, Federico.
aceman444 (2018-09-05 20:37:14+00:00): Dobry den, dakujem za aktualizaciu nazvov zastavok. Prosim v buducnosti ponechajte aj povodny nazov v znacke old_name= . 
Urobil som to teraz ja: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62324018
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:15:37+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:42:25+00:00): I am correcting the toponyms. there is nothing to discuss.
kasmar00 (2018-08-30 16:43:02+00:00): Hej, "powyginała" Ci się trochę Hetmańska (rampa zjazdowa w dół) po zachodniej stronie Dolnej Wildy.
maraf24 (2018-08-30 17:20:47+00:00): Fakt, znów zrobiłem ten sam błąd. A myślałem, że nie uploadowałem tych zmian.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:47:47+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:54:33+00:00): I am correcting the toponyms. there is nothing to discuss.
VlIvYur (2018-09-01 08:52:10+00:00): Hello
What's the minimum height limit there - 24 meters?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620981893
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620981890
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620981895
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-04-07 15:12:39+00:00): No. I know that this key "min_height" is similar in building tag. But this key changes in highways, sorry.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:27:04+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:53:10+00:00): I am correcting the toponyms. there is nothing to discuss.
dzidek23 (2018-12-17 09:01:48+00:00): Does Barnsdale Drive has no. 13? There is 11 and 15
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:31:54+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:53:25+00:00): I am correcting the toponyms. there is nothing to discuss.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:39:16+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:53:39+00:00): I am correcting the toponyms. there is nothing to discuss.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:39:21+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:53:54+00:00): I am correcting the toponyms. there is nothing to discuss.
Alecs01 (2018-09-01 07:43:14+00:00): Here we got three overlapping buildings, and a duplications of stadium tags, fixed.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-01 09:08:00+00:00): Hi Alecs, you tagged the stands as "covered stands", but only a small part of the stands are covered. And both roofs are not named "roof" anymore, what was wrong with that? I named the stands "stadium building", that's different from "stadium" I guess? Is that not okay?
Alecs01 (2018-09-01 09:33:27+00:00): Buildings should not overlap, use building:part instead
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-04 07:30:14+00:00): How can I use building:part?
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:39:24+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:54:17+00:00): I am correcting the toponyms. there is nothing to discuss.
Alecs01 (2018-09-01 07:38:59+00:00): One more building tag deleted, reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1639197/history
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-01 09:05:08+00:00): Hi Alecs, what was wrong with this building tag?
Alecs01 (2018-09-01 09:35:07+00:00): Nothing, that's why you shouldn't have deleted it.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 07:11:52+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:46:12+00:00): "озеро" not part of proper name(hydronim) of this water object. him hydronim in accordance with the toponymic card "Среднее Суздальское".

there is nothing to discuss here
Dinamik (2018-08-31 19:58:58+00:00): Can you tolerate, that common name can be different from short name, which is used in catalogues in such form for purposes of alphabetical order and for purposes of automatisation of object analysis? Here we see, that normal name (which is normally used, for example, in rgis) is a little bit longer, than short name. It is not an issue.  
If there is nothing to discuss here, why do continue making edits, which offer objections? We have to discuss or to follow the existing rules.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 23:10:00+00:00): No. This is nonsense. There is a toponym, which is a proper name, it CAN also have a generic word as an integral part, but this is a rarity in the Russian language, exceptions. And there is a compound name used for signatures on maps, on plates, in unspecialized, common, dictionaries, etc., which includes a toponym and a generic word. And according to the standards for the purposes of cartography and record keeping, the generic word is placed BEFORE the toponym. And this rule was introduced by Russian topographers and cartographers in the nineteenth century. And it is with the goal that there is no confusion, where the type of the geographic object, and where the toponym.
<br><br>
In the same RGIS SPb, if you open the tab "ПОРЯДОК И ВИДИМОСТЬ СЛОЕВ" and enable signatures for the "Водные объекты" layer, you will see that almost all waterbodies and most waterays will be signed without a generic word (but with their locality for some). Unfortunately, the RGIS is not a specialized source for toponyms, and therefore they also allow inaccuracies in their attitude. For example, the "Внутренний канал" they signed with an error, without the "канал" which in this case is part of the toponym.
<br><br>
The OSM, since it is primarily a data set, must display the real situation, transferring data from the database to those who will use them, not in a distorted form and do not decide for others how to display them. If you paid attention, then I use name:postfix tag to indicate the position of the generic word, if it is not part of the toponym. This is important for those who will create a style of map that relies on the natural position of the generic word. At the same time, we have no right to interfere with those who want to create a style based on standards and traditions.
<br><br><br><br>
see there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62122016
Dinamik (2018-08-30 07:11:30+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:45:26+00:00): "озеро" not part of proper name(hydronim) of this water object. him hydronim in accordance with the toponymic card "Нижнее Большое Суздальское".

there is nothing to discuss here
Dinamik (2018-08-31 19:58:25+00:00): 
Can you tolerate, that common name can be different from short name, which is used in catalogues in such form for purposes of alphabetical order and for purposes of automatisation of object analysis? Here we see, that normal name (which is normally used, for example, in rgis) is a little bit longer, than short name. It is not an issue.  
If there is nothing to discuss here, why do continue making edits, which offer objections? We have to discuss or to follow the existing rules.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 23:08:54+00:00): No. This is nonsense. There is a toponym, which is a proper name, it CAN also have a generic word as an integral part, but this is a rarity in the Russian language, exceptions. And there is a compound name used for signatures on maps, on plates, in unspecialized, common, dictionaries, etc., which includes a toponym and a generic word. And according to the standards for the purposes of cartography and record keeping, the generic word is placed BEFORE the toponym. And this rule was introduced by Russian topographers and cartographers in the nineteenth century. And it is with the goal that there is no confusion, where the type of the geographic object, and where the toponym.
<br><br>
In the same RGIS SPb, if you open the tab "ПОРЯДОК И ВИДИМОСТЬ СЛОЕВ" and enable signatures for the "Водные объекты" layer, you will see that almost all waterbodies and most waterays will be signed without a generic word (but with their locality for some). Unfortunately, the RGIS is not a specialized source for toponyms, and therefore they also allow inaccuracies in their attitude. For example, the "Внутренний канал" they signed with an error, without the "канал" which in this case is part of the toponym.
<br><br>
The OSM, since it is primarily a data set, must display the real situation, transferring data from the database to those who will use them, not in a distorted form and do not decide for others how to display them. If you paid attention, then I use name:postfix tag to indicate the position of the generic word, if it is not part of the toponym. This is important for those who will create a style of map that relies on the natural position of the generic word. At the same time, we have no right to interfere with those who want to create a style based on standards and traditions.
<br><br><br><br>
see there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62122016
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 23:17:41+00:00): "Внутренний канал" on the RGIS: http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179460
Dinamik (2018-08-31 23:25:19+00:00): When I choose "I" button and press to object, I see "Наименование: Внутренний канал".
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:28:24+00:00): nop!
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 00:35:37+00:00): https://pp.userapi.com/c830209/v830209104/186769/fS0w1DifQM8.jpg
Dinamik (2018-09-01 19:52:54+00:00): https://d.radikal.ru/d17/1809/09/639e3020bad8.jpg
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 20:00:57+00:00): So what?
Dinamik (2018-09-07 20:08:42+00:00): This is image for my phrase "When I choose "I" button and press to object, I see "Наименование: Внутренний канал"".
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-09 10:12:43+00:00): да блин.

тебе же говорят, что в том же РГИС СПб по разному подписывают объекты - на самой карте и в инфокарточке. и при этом это не валидный источник наименований - у них нет цели предоставить информацию о правильном наименовании. подписи у них формируются из нескольких полей из записи в базе, а может для разных подписей они используют разные поля(т.е. не компонуют).

Обыватель смотря общие справочники либо на карту, видит прежде всего подпись, а не наименование того или иного объекта. причём по русским стандартам и картографической традиции в подписи родовое слово(статусная часть, тип объекта, т.д.) ставится ПЕРЕД собственно названием - делается это именно для того, чтобы обыватели имели возможность их разделить.

и да. не существует никакой мифической "гидрографической традиции".
Dinamik (2018-09-14 20:01:00+00:00): Вы привели Внутренний канал как пример объекта, который подписывается в rgis без статусной части, я указал, что в поле наименование указано "Внутренний канал". Ну давайте вместо "гидрографическая традиция" будем говорить "традиция, касающаяся работы с гидрографическими объектами" - это меняет принципиально ситуацию?
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-17 12:47:43+00:00): канал "Внутренний канал" приводился, как яркий пример того, что РГИС в отношении топонимов не валидный источник.

правильно говорить "стандарты обозначения объектов гидрографической сети на топографических картах". гидрография к этому не имеет никакого отношения.
Dinamik (2018-09-22 21:28:57+00:00): У меня сложилось ощущение, что объявление РГИСа невалидным было сделано Вами именно из-за того, что в карточке объекта РГИС позволяет себе непростительную, с Вашей точки зрения, вольность - указывать в карточке естественное имя с родовым словом, проставленным с нужной стороны. По крайней мере, мне указываемые в карточках названия кажутся вполне последовательными: родовые слова не получаются автоматически из указанного типа объекта, не стоят хаотично, наименования имеют естественный вид.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-25 07:48:12+00:00): это невалидный источник, потому что там нет цели указывать имя собственное. не говоря же уже о хаосе в их базе с наименованиями и значительном устаревании информации.
Dinamik (2018-09-28 21:05:57+00:00): Ну да, если обрезают всё, что можно и что нельзя, значит, у них хаос и цели предоставить информацию о наименованиях у них нет).
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-29 15:35:04+00:00): вы что-то имеете против евреев, что так напираете на обрезание?
Dinamik (2018-08-30 07:11:11+00:00): You repeatedly suppressed part of name of waterbody. Please, stop multiply changing of names and start normal discussion.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:43:23+00:00): "озеро" not part of proper name(hydronim) of this water object. him hydronim in accordance with the toponymic card "Финское".
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:43:56+00:00): there is nothing to discuss here
Dinamik (2018-08-31 19:57:20+00:00): If there is nothing to discuss here, why do continue making edits, which offer objections? We have to discuss or to follow the existing rules.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 23:05:03+00:00): I am correcting the corrupted toponyms. You by the way also break rules.
dbaron (2018-08-31 04:47:14+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.  (It seems like there's a group of you.)  Your contributions are great, but I had to fix a few things in order to follow the normal way of mapping things in OSM.  Those fixes are at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62156804 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62156820 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62157192 .   For more information about mapping, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide .
viloan (2018-08-29 23:21:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Dinamik (2018-08-30 07:25:53+00:00): Check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179243 : "Наименование: пруд Рубаха Наполеона". Please, stop multiply changing of names.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:49:30+00:00): "пруд" not part of proper name(hydronim) of this water object. him hydronim in accordance with the toponymic card "Рубаха Наполеона".

i put in order the names.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:55:49+00:00): rgis not valid source for proper name water objects(hydronims)
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:03:39+00:00): see comments here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62123015
Warin61 (2018-09-01 04:14:15+00:00): Hi,
Regarding the wood relation .. that is not how to do it. 
Here I would make one way for the outside - place that as the outer role in the wood relation. 

Then place the way for the water into the wood relation - with the role inner.
5m4u9 (2018-08-30 16:58:22+00:00): hola, señalar como "area" sin establecer una categoria no es util para el mapa.
//
debes siempre elegir una categoria... por ejemplo podría ser barrio o un area de una urbanización cerrada...
//
lo importante es no inventarse cosas que no existan
5m4u9 (2018-08-30 16:52:26+00:00): hola, en general existe por cada objeto real una clasificación en el mapa
//
por ejemplo: si buscas hospital, escuela, arbol, piedra, aeropuerto... vas a poder encontrar una clasificación adecuada
//
en este caso debes siempre asignar una clasificación. solo poner "uso de suelo" en areas grandes donde existe comercio, industria, o sea del estado
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-09-01 13:46:21+00:00): Você desenhou vias por cima das outras aqui, não deve ser feito assim.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 07:26:10+00:00): Check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179240 : "Наименование: Серебряный пруд". Please, stop multiply changing of names.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:50:33+00:00): "пруд" not part of proper name(hydronim) of this water object. him hydronim in accordance with the toponymic card "Серебряный".

i put in order the names.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:55:20+00:00): rgis not valid source for proper name water objects(hydronims)
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:01:17+00:00): Can you tolerate, that common name can be different from short name, which is used in catalogues in such form for purposes of alphabetical order and for purposes of automatisation of object analysis? Here we see, that normal name (which is normally used, for example, in rgis) is a little bit longer, than short name. It is not an issue.  
Why do you think, that rgis is a bad source? Is it because of rgis using of normal names?
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 23:11:10+00:00): No. This is nonsense. There is a toponym, which is a proper name, it CAN also have a generic word as an integral part, but this is a rarity in the Russian language, exceptions. And there is a compound name used for signatures on maps, on plates, in unspecialized, common, dictionaries, etc., which includes a toponym and a generic word. And according to the standards for the purposes of cartography and record keeping, the generic word is placed BEFORE the toponym. And this rule was introduced by Russian topographers and cartographers in the nineteenth century. And it is with the goal that there is no confusion, where the type of the geographic object, and where the toponym.
<br><br>
In the same RGIS SPb, if you open the tab "ПОРЯДОК И ВИДИМОСТЬ СЛОЕВ" and enable signatures for the "Водные объекты" layer, you will see that almost all waterbodies and most waterays will be signed without a generic word (but with their locality for some). Unfortunately, the RGIS is not a specialized source for toponyms, and therefore they also allow inaccuracies in their attitude. For example, the "Внутренний канал" they signed with an error, without the "канал" which in this case is part of the toponym.
<br><br>
The OSM, since it is primarily a data set, must display the real situation, transferring data from the database to those who will use them, not in a distorted form and do not decide for others how to display them. If you paid attention, then I use name:postfix tag to indicate the position of the generic word, if it is not part of the toponym. This is important for those who will create a style of map that relies on the natural position of the generic word. At the same time, we have no right to interfere with those who want to create a style based on standards and traditions.
freebeer (2018-08-30 13:37:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62140558 where the changeset comment is: revert apparently continuing vandalism.  this will be reviewed and manually corrected, but Public defecation area is implausible.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 07:27:18+00:00): Check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179241 : "Наименование: Цветочный пруд". Please, stop multiply changing of names and using suppressed names.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:53:14+00:00): "пруд" not part of proper name(hydronim) of this water object. him hydronim in accordance with the toponymic card "Цветочный".

i put in order the names.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:55:35+00:00): rgis not valid source for proper name water objects(hydronims)
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:03:18+00:00): see comments here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62123015
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 23:12:21+00:00): see there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62121918
viloan (2018-08-30 02:04:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-08-30 03:00:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Tuesday M-H (2018-08-30 03:39:14+00:00): reviewer: I haven't done corrections to roads before, so I'd appreciate checking to see that I didn't foul anything up. I corrected the data with personally-collected GPS tracks, and removed spurious ways where I *know* there aren't any, but the ones in the eastern side of the triangle between round pond, long pond, and halfway pond road I'm unsure about so I left them with most of their nodes.
Commodoortje (2018-08-30 13:16:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Commodoortje (2018-08-30 13:49:43+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486618468
seperator moet een . zijn.
maxwidth=2,3 moet 2.3 zijn.
eggie (2018-08-30 20:10:03+00:00): Vaak is het zo dat tweewielers zijn uitgezonderd van eenrichting. Dan dien je nog toe te voegen oneway:bicycle=noen evt. oneway:moped=no. We willen toch allemaal graag dat het blijft routeren. Graag reactie of dat hier het geval is.
Commodoortje (2018-08-31 02:43:56+00:00): Ik heb je wat geholpen om de parkeerplaats beter in kaart te brengen.
Hier kun je mijn wijziging zien:
parking=surface dient icm amenity=parking te worden gebruikt. Aangezien er al een parkeervlak aanwezig was had je deze hier kunnen aanbrengen.
Hier kun je mijn verbeteringen zien:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=62158150
Commodoortje (2018-08-31 02:53:14+00:00): parking=lane is geen juiste tagging
Ik heb je wat geholpen in de verbetering.
Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=62158264
Hier kun je lezen waarom:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane