piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
frosm (2019-06-04 11:44:18+00:00): Bonjour,
je traduis les propos de  Mateusz s'il y a un soucis avec l'anglais.
 Mateusz vous demande quel est la source de ces données ? cela semble être un import comme le renseigne la source mais en même temps vous dite que c'est une visite sur le terrain.
par ailleurs que est la signification de 
standing=low ?
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
tekim (2016-03-04 15:55:18+00:00): Lou, Thanks for contributing to OSM.  I am interested to know why you are tagging groups of trees as "leisure=park". In OSM these are normally tagged as "natural=wood"
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
mojodna (2016-02-27 02:06:05+00:00): "Edger's lake"
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
maraf24 (2016-02-26 20:34:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4028768857
Na pewno Gad? Może Gać?
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
EneaSuper (2016-02-26 20:17:21+00:00): Mancano solo da revisionare i sentieri dopo i cantieri D:
maraf24 (2019-04-16 15:09:58+00:00): Nie wiem jakie jest źródło tych tracków w tym regionie, ale one nie istnieją w terenie. Przecinają grzbiety i strumienie i wyglądają, jakby były rysowane na ślepo.
Władysław Komorek (2019-04-16 15:12:28+00:00): Nie mam zielonego pojęcia o czym piszesz.
maraf24 (2019-04-16 17:36:42+00:00): Pytam się o pochodzenie danych. Bo nie jest to Geoportal - na orto, isok i skanie map topo nie istnieją drogi o takich przebiegach.
Władysław Komorek (2019-04-16 18:34:35+00:00): A skąd mam pamiętać jakie WMS'y były aktualne 3 lata temu!
Najlepiej to wszystkie obiekty co nie mają źródła a są starsze niż 2 lata - do usunięcia.
SimonPoole (2016-02-26 23:25:31+00:00): Dear arhjakon thank you for the many contributions you have made over teh last couple of days.

Could you however be so kind and add meaningful comments to your edits, you can use your native language if you want to. But as is it is very difficult to understand what you are adding.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
aaronq227 (2025-08-27 13:32:08+00:00): Hi dyingtrees,

I noticed you added a ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400308005) in Malaysia and mentioned this is a "boat ride to D’Lagoon”. Ferry routes generally start and end at an amenity=ferry_terminal but this route doesn’t appear to connect to a ferry terminal at either end (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry). You originally included the name=jetty from Kuala Besut which is located at (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602971660) and I am wondering if you believe this route should be connected here. Also do you think an attraction=boat_ride or a route=boat tag would be more appropriate than route=ferry (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dboat_ride, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dboat)? If so, could you change the tagging here? 

Thanks for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you.
flaimo (2016-02-27 11:16:48+00:00): Kann man als Radfahrer/Fußgeher beim Donauparkstadion jetzt nicht mehr die Straße (vor der Brücke) überqueren, weil du die Geh- und Radwege gelöscht hast?
Auch die Straße bis zur Brücke selber existiert ja weiterhin noch, oder?
leon-o (2016-02-27 13:50:47+00:00): Abbruchkonzept Eisenbahnbrücke:
http://linz.at/images/Abbruchkonzept_Eisenbahnbruecke.pdf

Jetzt schon noch aber wenn kommenden Montag (29.02.16) die Abbrucharbeiten beginnen wird der Bereich als Lager- und Manipulationsfläche verwendet. 
Das gleiche gilt für die Straße bis zur Brücke.
Hjart (2016-02-26 22:03:18+00:00): Hej
Jeg har lige tilladt mig at korrigere alle de gravhøje du har markeret. Jeg vil mene det er noget uheldigt at navngive dem alle "Gravhøj", da dette besværliggør en angivelse af et eventuelt reelt navn (f.eks. "Storehøj" eller "Lokes høj"), så jeg har flyttet dette over under "description".
Du kan iøvrigt finde alle korrekt taggede gravhøje i et givent område med denne søgning: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/eE8. God fornøjelse
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-15 17:23:30+00:00): Adding turn lanes for direction confirmation arrows on offramps aren't useful, it's the actual function of the lanes that is.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
SomeoneElse (2016-02-28 13:43:30+00:00): For places that have names in both Serbian and Albania, I'd suggest adding "name:sr" and "name:sq" tags as well as the "name" tag.  That way it's easy for people who want to create a map with all-Albanian names or all-Serbian ones.  Here it does make sense for the "name" tag to be in Serbian as that's the majority language spoken here this side of the river.
(same comment also added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37483870 ).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
MKnight (2016-03-11 14:37:13+00:00): what should: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400331103 be? and why isnt it connectet to the street?
SomeoneElse (2016-03-05 00:39:38+00:00): Hi, previously Brantano https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2433632431 was at the northeast end https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.30036&mlon=-4.61744&zoom=18#map=18/53.30036/-4.61744 - has it moved?
Luzandro (2021-05-19 16:45:26+00:00): Hallo,

was soll node=2km bedeuten?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4029082852
mueschel (2016-04-05 21:14:55+00:00): Hi pfunkman,
there are four ways with foreign keys and none of the usual OSM keys, see link below. Can they be corrected / deleted?
Cheers, Jan

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B%28node%5B%22FIL_TP_DSC%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22FIL_TP_DSC%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22FIL_TP_DSC%22%5D%3B%29%3Bout%20meta%3B
pfunkman (2016-04-05 21:38:40+00:00): Yes, I will correct the keys. Thanks for noticing it. Sorry for the mistake.
wille (2016-02-28 17:01:00+00:00): Oi!

Tudo bem?

Obrigado por suas contribuições ao OSM! Nesse changeset você apagou várias pequenas estradas de terra que de fato existem. Qual foi o motivo de ter removido essas estradas?
fkv (2017-01-29 16:22:29+00:00): Setze bitte keine zufälligen Werte, sondern nur welche, wo du es weißt. Den Begleitweg der B50 z.B. hast du fälschlich auf "AT:urban" statt "sign" gesetzt. Außerdem sollte maximal eines von source:maxspeed und maxspeed:type gesetzt werden, da diese gleichbedeutend sind. Wir sollten diesen Changeset komplett revertieren, da anscheinend alle bearbeiteten Ways von mindestens einem der beiden Fehler betroffen sind.
Miflo (2017-01-30 17:40:00+00:00): Hallo, 
jetzt wo ich mir den Datensatz ansehe, weiß ich gar nicht was mich damals geritten hat.
Glaube ein Revert ist vermutlich kein schlechter Vorschlag.
fkv (2017-01-30 21:55:24+00:00): Machst du, oder soll ich?
Miflo (2017-01-30 22:04:14+00:00): Mach besser du, hab mich mit dem revertieren bisher noch garnicht beschäftigt.
fkv (2017-02-02 16:42:15+00:00): Ist durch. Ich verwende für so was diese Perlscripts: https://github.com/woodpeck/osm-revert-scripts
Schwierigkeiten treten dann auf, wenn Objekte in der Zwischenzeit bearbeitet wurden. Besonders grauslich wird es dann mit Relationen (Multipolygone usw.), aber die waren diesmal zum Glück nicht betroffen. Tagänderungen sind vergleichsweise harmlos. Mühsam war nur, dass etliche Ways zerteilt worden waren (v.a. von emergency99 für seine Busrouten). Außerdem kommen viele redundante source:maxspeed/maxspeed:type von anderen Changesets. Ich hab zwar alle bearbeitet, über die ich zufällig gestoßen bin, aber mit Overpass findest du sicher noch etliche.
davidsanger (2016-02-27 02:34:29+00:00): seem to have gotten two peak changes in one changeset
ianlopez1115 (2016-02-27 06:30:01+00:00): Should be [Lo Wu Control Point & Luohu Checkpoint] ...
user_5359 (2016-02-27 07:13:58+00:00): Really a church (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship) ? Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a .
manings (2016-03-03 08:48:04+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581537
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
manings (2016-03-03 08:50:31+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581580
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
manings (2016-03-03 08:53:13+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581620
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
manings (2016-03-03 08:54:50+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581620
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
Nakaner (2016-02-29 12:19:49+00:00): Hallo Claudia,

bitte trage als Name nur Eigennamen ein. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name "Toilette Eurokey" ist kein Eigenname, höchstens eine Beschreibung. Dass eine Rollstuhl-Toilette ein Eurokey-Schloss hat, wird in OpenStreetMap mit centralkey=eurokey erfasst. Ob du das auch über das Wheelmap-Webinterface eingeben kannst, weiß ich nicht. Mit dem iD-Onlineeditor auf osm.org geht es aber.

Bitte sei außerdem vorsichtig, welcher POI-Klasse du im Wheelmap-Webinterface du einem Objekt zuweißt. Weder ist diese Toilette in Ludwigshafen-Oggersheim ein Bahnhof noch der Parkplatz neben dem Bahnhof Cottbus ein Bahnhof. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304926814/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4029426992/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Viele Grüße

Michael
user_5359 (2016-02-27 07:24:56+00:00): correction of the changes comment: revert changes 37475355
manings (2016-03-03 08:56:41+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581668
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
manings (2016-03-03 08:59:48+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581712
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
manings (2016-03-03 09:01:59+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581746
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
Seehundeführer (2016-02-27 09:04:24+00:00): It seems that this edit wasn't prepared properbly: You deleted Node 3455612384 which had much more details than the remaining node on the same position 3455612402. This is only one example.
whb (2016-02-27 09:30:29+00:00): Please revert or fix this edit.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-27 10:36:12+00:00): Reverted following a request from the changeset author in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37478490 .
user_870861 (2016-02-27 10:36:22+00:00): sorry, i don't know what appenened with me/josm ...
i ask the dwg to revert my changeset:
37472697,37472819,37476156,37476225,37476283,37476341,37476418
manings (2016-03-03 09:04:40+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581798
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
manings (2016-03-03 09:06:47+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581824
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
manings (2016-03-03 09:08:37+00:00): Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37581852
See: See: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/8
literan (2016-02-27 14:42:43+00:00): На первый раз откатываю.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
ma-rt-in (2016-02-27 18:41:50+00:00): Hallo,

danke für die Ergänzungen, jedoch finde ich das der Platz nicht Weinhaus heißen sollte. Habs mal geändert.
surveyor54 (2016-02-29 08:12:15+00:00): Ok, ist auch in Ordnung, einen Namen wollte ich hier schon vergeben, zur Identifizierung.
Gruß
surveyor54
lokx (2017-11-05 15:22:54+00:00): Hallo Grauer,
ich stoße heute auf deine Interpolation von Straßen zu Adressen - und finde das gar nicht akkurat. Das ehemalige Cafe Feifel ("Erlenblick 39") hat garantiert nicht  Erlenblick als Straße, es entstammt noch weit vor der Zeit. Mir wäre es lieber, dann keine Straße dranzuschreiben, dann kann man nämlich "Objekte ohne Straße" nachträglich durchgucken. Besser allemal als falsche Straßen, das führt zu "gefühlter Korrektheit", weil da ja schon was dransteht.

Grüße,
lokx
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
fangly (2016-02-27 09:44:24+00:00): Wrong commit message, sorry. It should read:
"Added missing walking paths, slightly improved existing ones from satellite imagery"
DD1GJ (2016-02-27 11:30:22+00:00): Hallo ekbert786, dieses Wegstück ist doppelt auf das Gebäude und ein anderes Wegstück gezeichnet. Fußwege entlang der Straße ohne bauliche Trennung werden nicht extra eingezeichnet. Was ist der Hintergrund dieser Edits? Machst Du das privat oder im Auftrag für ein Projekt?
ekbert786 (2016-02-28 14:41:58+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ,

ich mache das privat. Das der Weg dort doppelt ist, war ein Missgeschick. Wie ich gerade im Wiki gesehen habe, gibt es das zusätzliche Attribut "sidewalk" für die Straße. Soll ich die von mir erstellten Wege an den Straßen entfernen und stattdessen die Straßen mit dem Attribut versehen? Und wie handhabt sich das Ganze mit Radwegen?
DD1GJ (2016-02-28 19:25:54+00:00): Hallo ekbert786, das Thema wird in der Community kontrovers diskutiert, aber die Lösung mit sidewalk ist wartungsfreundlicher und hat sich in Deutschland durchgesetzt. Wenn es kombinierte Fuß/Radwege sind, dann z.B.: sidewalk=both und cycleway=both und evtl. segregated=yes/no

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

Das mit Fußgängern und Radfahrern ist immer so eine Sache, da jeder die OSM-Welt für seine Hauptverkehrsmittel optimieren will ;-)
literan (2016-02-27 14:38:57+00:00): правильно писать в адресе не "7 c. 2", а "7 c2", без точек и пробелов. Здесь поправлю.
Vadiм (2016-02-27 16:30:46+00:00): OK!
vasony (2016-02-29 10:48:22+00:00): Szia!

Nyíregyháza 6-os posta épületében van még más is, hogy leszedted az épületről a post_office-t?

Tamás
chnav (2016-02-29 19:19:20+00:00): Большая просьба ничего не удаляйте пока не наберетесь опыта. Вы сначала поставили адрес дома на весь микрорайон, потом удалили его целиком. Достаточно было изменить тег обратно на landuse=residential.
Пожалуйста, будьте аккуратнее.
MKnight (2016-07-29 22:00:49+00:00): was hat es mit diesem revert genau auf sich? Siehe zusammenhängend damit: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41115387
MKnight (2016-07-29 22:27:38+00:00): what about this revert? see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41115387 in combination of that
SomeoneElse (2016-08-01 15:22:29+00:00): @MKnight Thanks - I've separately been in discussion with botdidier2020 about lack of explanation in changeset comments, and have sent them a must-read message http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/995 (which they have just read).  Hopefully they'll use more meaningful comments in the future.
Re the specific changes in these large changesets I've commented on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41111643 asking about the removal of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148427804/history .  I suspect that they thought that it was a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148188907 , but tags don't match and not all of the nodes do.
If you see specific changes that look wrong; please do ask "why was X deleted".  In the case of http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41115387 , some of the deletions look valid - http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4008263371/history looks like a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4008253070 to me.  Usually with changesets of this type it's easy to find something where a "fix" that removes an error on a QA site actually makes things worse rather than better.
Regards,
Andy
Meillo (2016-02-27 19:29:00+00:00): It would be great to get some background information about this revert and the original changeset. Is there a message on a mailing list? I'm curious to understand what went on.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-28 11:13:59+00:00): Hi,
The "background discussion" started off on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37476283 .  What happened was that while merging some nodes, some detail was lost.  The author of that changeset contacted the DWG asking for it and a number of other similar changesets to be reverted so that they could check the data.  I suspect that they didn't want to do it themselves at this time with JOSM+reverter plugin because there have been a couple of issues with that recently (the last time I updated JOSM plugins the reverter stopped working with the latest tested JOSM, and previously there were other issues with reverts not happening).  I knew that I did have working matching versions of JOSM+reverter plugin so did actually use that to do the reverts.
I didn't mention that the mail had come via the DWG in the message above because it wasn't really relevant to the requested changes - I didn't want it to appear as some sort of DWG "punishment" (which it wasn't - we all make mistakes sometimes and it's great that when a problem has been spotted in OSM everyone wants to fix it).  
Cheers,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse)
Meillo (2016-03-29 09:22:51+00:00): A bit late, but anyhow: Thanks for the explanation. :-)
skyper (2016-10-05 00:46:26+00:00): Da ist wohl einiges schief gelaufen.
Habe hier etliche duplicate nodes zB https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3765790696
Hjart (2016-03-12 21:11:46+00:00): I noticed some errors stemming from your work here (duplicate roads, parts of roads being deleted). Please be carefull. I guess I'll have to go through everything you have done here in Roskilde and possibly revert some of it.
EBP2015 (2016-03-13 08:05:53+00:00): I am very sorry for that, had some trouble with JOSM in the beginning. I will also have a look on the points you mentioned and correct them.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:13:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-28 20:12:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37507447 where the changeset comment is: reverted world-wide denomination changes since they lack discussion and were made in spite of the earlier block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/873).
DD1GJ (2016-02-27 13:57:44+00:00): Hallo Michael, willkommen bei OSM. Es genügt, den Goldenen Ochsen einmal einzutragen, entweder als eigenen Knoten oder am Gebäudeumring. Du brauchst nicht nach jedem einzelnen Haus abspeichern. Mach 10 bis 20 auf einmal und speichere dann, dann wird es etwas übersichtlicher mit den ganzen Changesets. Weitere Infos unter http://einklich.net/temp/osm-tutorial.pdf
WKOSM (2016-09-11 10:45:47+00:00): Hallo Michael-85,
OSMOSE sieht hier "E 1070 Straße schneidet Gebäude"

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=17&lat=49.309403&lon=8.1213&item=1070&level=2&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT

Bitte lese hierzu:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Buildings#Werkzeuge_und_Methoden
=> Grundlinie finden: und folge dem Link => "Tipps und Tricks zum Nachzeichnen von Gebäuden"

Das Beispiel hier zeigt 3 Probleme:
1. Gebäude dürfen nicht mit Straßen verbunden werden
2. Gebäude sind in der Regel rechtwinklig
3. Gebäude(linien) dürfen sich nicht überschneiden - hier Haus 24 - aber die gleichen Punkte benutzen.

Bitte versuche die Probleme zu beseitigen. Danke.
Myazyk (2016-02-28 11:54:39+00:00): капєц
olehz (2016-02-28 13:59:40+00:00): ?