piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2018-04-01 21:49:59+00:00): Thanks for this - it's great to have contributions "from the inside" of industrial sites etc.  However, would it be possible to use changeset comments that are a bit more descriptive?  "ÉT" on every changeset doesn't really help anyone understand what's changed...
Best Regards,
Andy
demon_box (2018-03-31 15:13:14+00:00): ciao, anche qui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574977186
landuse=meadow sopra landuse=forest
basta per favore ;-)
aceman444 (2020-02-13 20:49:39+00:00): Zdravim, na bodoch s attraction=animal nema byt tourism=attraction. tourism je uz na celom zoo. Pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:attraction . Dajte tu znacku pred, dakujem.
Rick Richards (2020-02-13 21:36:38+00:00): Zdravím, opravené.
aceman444 (2020-02-13 21:46:51+00:00): Super, dakujem.
Este ich tam par ostalo, napr. Zubor a Kone.
Rick Richards (2020-02-13 21:57:24+00:00): Maličkosť. Už by to malo byť okej.
aceman444 (2020-02-13 22:53:45+00:00): Ano, super, dakujem.
freeExec (2018-04-02 08:27:18+00:00): Тег здания удалил, его снесли или что
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435912008
eggie (2018-03-31 11:04:26+00:00): Klopt .. er staat zelfs een richtingsbord naar Lankhorst. Je zou er nog note= "fietsen toegestaan" o.i.d.  bij kunnen zetten voordat iemand het weer op slot gaat zetten omdat er gedeeltelijk een fietspad langsloopt.
highflyer74 (2018-04-01 08:49:52+00:00): Moin Matze!

Danke für das Hinzufügen des Hauses. Achte beim Einzeichnen von Gebäuden darauf, dass ein rechteckiger Umriss auch nur aus vier Nodes (Punkten) besteht. In diesem Fall haben Haus und Anbau jeweils einen zuviel. Ansonsten sieht alles gut aus!

Viele Grüße aus dem Bremer Osten!
Constable (2018-03-31 12:44:18+00:00): ciao, guarda però che le aree cani hanno un tag apposito https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=dog_park
Il nome inoltre deve indicare il nome proprio di un oggetto non deve servire da descrizione, quindi se l'area cani ha un nome inseriscilo, in caso contrario no, non aggiungerlo.
Constable (2018-03-31 12:46:13+00:00): lo stesso vale anche per il sentiero che hai aggiunto. Dubito abbia un nome, quindi "Percorso all'area cani" non è adatto e il tag name non andrebbe usato
bison166 (2018-05-09 11:22:03+00:00): Hi Tleclh.....in addr:city sollte nur der postalische Ort stehen, hier also Kirchlinteln. Der Ortsteil kann mit addr:suburb=Brunsbrock ergänzt werden, aber das ist optional.  Gruß Rolf
Tleclh (2018-05-09 11:33:33+00:00): Hi, wurde geändert, danke
viloan (2018-03-31 10:53:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SK53 (2018-03-31 11:12:29+00:00): Congratulations! Not many folk get to add a significant place in London on OSM these days. Fancy Wood Green having been missing for all this time (at least since 2012).  I meant to add it, having checked earlier, but you beat me too it.

It's a judgement call, but some of the place=suburb nodes around here may be more suitable as place=neighbourhood (e.g., Noel Park which I'd say was IN Wood Green (but my local knowledge is somewhat outdated, I moved from Palmers Green in 1982 :-)).

Also Noel Park had precisely defined boundaries so could be mapped as landuse=residential with name & one of place=suburb or place=neighbourhood.

Best wishes, 

SK53
hjuk (2018-03-31 11:37:44+00:00): I was surprised about Wood Green too. I agree about Noel Park. I'd already changed Noel Park to a neighbourhood and added an is-in Wood Green. Thanks for your advice re landuse - have now added that too.
SK53 (2018-03-31 11:46:00+00:00): Looks like Shopping City (aka The Mall) could do with adding too. You can do the same thing; cut up the retail area and have a specific bit of retail area for the shopping centre. For some odd reason the tag for shopping centres is shop=mall.

Local knowledge is what OSM is built on and both makes OSM different & more useful.
hjuk (2018-03-31 11:54:49+00:00): I think it's there already - the name appears at its eastern edge.
Hjart (2018-03-31 12:55:49+00:00): Bemærk at det nu om dage er bedst at bruge SDFE Luftfotos, som opdateres hvert forår
ablansinger (2018-03-31 13:13:33+00:00): Sidder lidt med en fornemmelse at du ikke har nget at give dig til, og derfor permanent overvåger om nogen piller ved de ting du har lavet. Du virker meget demotiverende på mig må jeg sige.
Hjart (2018-03-31 13:15:27+00:00): Du bryder dig heller ikke om gode råd?
Hjart (2018-03-31 13:21:16+00:00): Det er korrekt at jeg ofte ikke har så meget andet at give mig til, men jeg må også sige at jeg faktisk holder meget af mit "arbejde" her. 
Nogen enkelte får "ondt i røven" af det når jeg kommenterer deres redigeringer, andre sætter stor pris på det. Det tager jeg alt sammen med :-)
ablansinger (2018-04-01 12:45:14+00:00): Egentlig har jeg ikke noget mod gode råd, men når det efterhånden føles mere som overvågning end som god råd så nej tak.
Hjart (2018-04-01 17:49:25+00:00): Nu er der jo ikke tale om at jeg sidder uden for dit hus og overvåger dit privatliv.
Vores projekt her derimod, med alle vores uerfarne begyndere (og folk der har holdt pause i flere år og begynder igen uden at være opmærksomme på at vi nu gør visse ting på en lidt anden måde), fungerer ganske enkelt bedst når der er nogen der overvåger det og fanger og retter evt. uhensigtsmæssigheder. Selvfølgelig kan tanken om at man redigerer i et stort offentligt projekt og at der er "nogen derude" der sidder og tjekker hvad man har lavet, virke skræmmende for mange (det var det for mig til at begynde med), men hvis man vil være med er det simpelthen noget man er nødt til at komme over.
osmviborg (2018-04-01 19:29:58+00:00): @Hjart, du er er syg i hovedet.
Hjart (2018-04-01 19:31:37+00:00): @osmviborg, tak i lige måde.
ablansinger (2018-04-01 20:43:56+00:00): @Hjart, du skal overveje om det bidrager positivt til OSM at alle bidrag ydere sidder med en følelse af at du sidder og overvåger hver eneste lille rettelse der laves.
Hjart (2018-04-01 21:06:38+00:00): Jeg har i adskillige tilfælde fået positiv tilkendegivelser på det, så jeg er ret sikker på at jeg bidrager positivt til OSM.
ablansinger (2018-04-01 21:26:45+00:00): Og hvis diskutionen her i tråden slet ikke kan give dig den mindste tvivl om dette, så er der nok ikke så meget at gøre ved det. Men spild endelig ikke mere tid på at kommenterer på mine change set for jeg orker dig ikke mere.
Hjart (2018-04-02 08:09:34+00:00): Du kan ikke automatisk antage at "alle bidragsydere" sidder med den samme følelse, som du sidder med. Det er afgjort ikke mit indtryk.
ablansinger (2018-04-02 09:20:01+00:00): Det har du ret i, men det kniber åbenbart for dig at forstå at det heller ikke er alle der deler dit indtryk.
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-31 11:20:24+00:00): There are some more, see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/xuu – you think we could do a small mechanical edit here?
lakedistrict (2018-03-31 12:05:07+00:00): Sounds like a good idea - can you do it?
kreuzschnabel (2018-04-01 08:02:56+00:00): Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57706364
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-04-15 22:33:03+00:00): Thanks for fixing it!
mueschel (2018-04-01 10:39:01+00:00): Hi,
you introduced a huge number of new tags in this changeset, which have not been used in any other place and which are not documented. Please spend some time reading the Wiki to find out how these features have to be mapped so that they can be understood by software and are for example shown on maps.


House:code 	1A20
addr:Distirct 	Mbeya vijijini
addr:Village 	Njelenje
adults 	4
cash_access 	Commerce;MPESA
cash_deposit 	Commerce
electricity 	no
fence 	no
head_household 	yes
house:rooms 	6
house_member 	5
house_rent 	no it is not for rent
livestock 	yes
livestock_type 	Pig
number_houses_compound 	2
other_energy 	tochi na koroboi
roofing:colour 	silva
roofing:condtition 	kutu
roofing:material 	Iron sheet
roofing:style 	Others
bgirardot (2018-04-08 15:08:24+00:00): @mueschel Thank you very much for the heads up. We are follow up on this now. Very much appreciated.
bgirardot (2018-04-09 12:14:33+00:00): @mueschel This appears to have been a mistake in uploading data to OSM. We asked the DWG to revert this. So a number of these tags are not intended to be part of OSM data.
Again, thank you for flagging it for us.
Alexander-II (2018-03-31 22:47:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не вандальте, пожалуйста. Это не приветствуется на проекте. Правку откатываю.
eggie (2018-03-31 12:11:31+00:00): Klopt Etiënne ..dat gebouw is weg. Gebruik je wel de kadaster pdok 2017 actueel als achtergrond? Je noemt BING als bron. Anders even de bron veranderen in josm zelf. 
Die is het meest recent. Je zou de landuse nog kunnen invullen.
Etiënne Thomassen (2018-03-31 13:35:27+00:00): Ja, die heb ik gebruikt. Maar die stond niet in het lijstje met bronnen.
Ben nu naar de landuse aan het kijken. Hoe kun je 'snappen' aanzetten als je (landuse en residential)? Heb moeite dat te vinden op internet. Het moet toch kunnen...

Dankjewel voor het nakijken. Eerste edit met JOSM :-)
eggie (2018-03-31 14:17:56+00:00): In het begin is alles abracadabra.. 
De landuse=residential geeft de bebouwing aan. De landuse grass kun je aanpassen. Nodes samenvoegen met de M-toets.
Hier nog een nuttige link voor josm: https://blog.mapbox.com/become-a-power-mapper-619077da4ef4
Alles staat in de wiki..  Zie de links in mijn welkomstmail. Zit vast nog wel in je postvak. 
nogmaals ...3.	Nuttige links. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM (een introductiepagina met veel nuttige tips onder het kopje 'Waar moet je op letten als je de kaart gaat bewerken?') http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features (overzicht van vrijwel alle elementen die in OSM gebruikt worden) https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 (Nederlandstalig deel van forum; de plek om vragen te stellen en ideeën op te doen)
eggie (2018-03-31 14:19:35+00:00): Volgens mij kun je in josm zelf een tekst invoeren welke bron je gebruikt bij upload.
lakedistrict (2018-03-31 12:21:21+00:00): Could you link to the CCC map data please?

By the way, we've got a little ongoing project to add details to the roads in Cumbria - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Gurglypipe/North_West#Road_navigation_for_tourists
SK53 (2018-03-31 12:48:28+00:00): I'm not sure this is a particularly good idea. This was done in the Highlands and it turned out that many of the local highway classifications were based on physical properties rather than the functional view which is used on OSM. The highway authority might be useful to highlight potential discrepancies, but its best to crosscheck against other points to cross-check are OOC OS maps where the classification is usually similar to that typically used by OSM.

Also highway authority maps/data may not be a truly usable source. I think some have given explicit permission for use of lists of streets by OSM. The maps will always have some issues with OSGB copyright.
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-31 18:21:19+00:00): I thought a bit about this but found it useful at last. It is true (and good) that road tagging in OSM is supposed to depict the traffic importance rather than the official classification. From this point of view, Villages like Great Asby or Crosby Garrett being reachable only by unclassified roads does not seem appropriate to me. This is a cultivated and habitated area and needs more than unclassified roads only for stretches of 12 miles and more. The road from Raisbeck to Little Asby is the only road to cross that limestone highland at all, and though there is not too much traffic, it’s surely of greater importance than an unclassified road, leading e.g. to a remote hamlet. There are even more C roads given in the map on https://apps1.wdm.co.uk/Pipcumbriahms/map.aspx?cg=PROW but I didn’t want to include all the short ones for they’re surely not that important. As for copyright issues, I always thought that, while we may not copy from the drawing as such, we are still free to extract abstract data (such as mountain elevations or place names).
SK53 (2018-03-31 18:46:44+00:00): I would agree that all but the smallest villages should notionally be accessible by tertiaries, and have used it as a rule of thumb when looking at roads in the past: at the very least one road should be feasible for larger vehicles. As I said the two old OS maps + OS Streetview also provide another comparison point, but nothing really substitutes for a visit.

On a slightly separate point: adding passing places on the narrow country roads might also be useful to assist in identifying the unclassifieds vs tertiaries where no roads have white lines.
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-31 19:17:27+00:00): nothing really substitutes for a visit: true. That’s why I prefer to map regions I have already seen, even if its a while ago. Last time I came through here was on my latest C2C in 2012 but I don’t think the roads have changed significantly since. As for the passing places, I actually did :D
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/340514232
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/340514230
SK53 (2018-04-01 09:46:10+00:00): Heatmap of Passing Places https://www.flickr.com/photos/sk53_osm/41035716242/in/photostream/
user_5359 (2018-04-01 14:16:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
viloan (2018-03-31 12:04:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-03-31 12:09:54+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Baban Abdulrahman (2018-10-29 17:00:50+00:00): Remove this place because this place fake
Baban Abdulrahman (2018-10-29 17:01:14+00:00): Remove this place
bison166 (2018-04-01 06:09:45+00:00): moin letihu,
jetzt werde ich aber langsam sauer !!!!
Was machts du mit den Gebäuden.
Du kannst nicht einfach building=yes auf building=part setzen, dann sind die weg !!!
Dann musst du einen anderen Weg gehen, der im 3D mapping zu finden ist.
bison166 (2018-04-01 06:11:47+00:00): ich habe dich gestern schon darauf hingewiesen, aber du machst einfach munter weiter :(
letihu (2018-04-01 11:25:17+00:00): 
Moin bison166,
das ist leider noch eine Altlast von gestern. Ich habe deinen Kommentar leider erst gestern Abend gelesen und da waren die Änderungssätze schon hochgeladen.
Natürlich mache ich nie mit einfach weiter, wenn ich Kritik daran gibt und ich etwas besser machen kann.
Ich werde einfach Gebäude im Gebäude lassen damit es für den Renderer schön ist. Richtig findet JOSM und andere Tools dass nicht.
Je mehr man macht, je mehr macht man falsch :(
beweta (2018-04-01 17:24:02+00:00): "Damit es für den Renderer schön ist" ist bei OpenStreetMap eine unverwünschte Arbeitsweise.[1] Lies dir bitte auch die Grundlagen[2] durch oder lass die Finger von OSM. Mitleid bekommst du von mir jedenfalls nicht, wenn du aus Unwissenheit Daten zerstörst.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
demon_box (2018-03-31 14:56:30+00:00): ciao, anche qui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575031464
landuse=quarry sopra natural=scrub
puoi sistemare?
grazie
demon_box (2018-03-31 15:05:54+00:00): ciao, hai mappato
questo grande landuse=farmland
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575031281
e poi sopra ci metti gli altri landuse più piccoli, non và bene.
dovresti fare il landuse=farmland grande come multipoligono e poi tutti altri landuse più piccoli come membri inner del multipoligono farmland.
se non sai come fare o non ti ancora ben chiaro, se vuoi ti sistemo quest'area per farti capire come si fa.
dimmi te, ok?
grazie
eggie (2018-03-31 12:36:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-31 12:38:07+00:00): tip: In voetgangersgebieden in winkelstraten wordt pedestrian gebruikt .. hier beter footway gebruiken. Vrander je het zelf?
Ivo96 (2018-03-31 12:53:38+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast, is dit wel de goede variant? Mijn OSM staat op Nederlands, dus ik hoop het nu wel.
eggie (2018-03-31 12:39:51+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Geen info en adressen toekennen aan gebouwen. Dit hoort op de reeds bestaande adresnode. Nu heet het gebouw Rijschool attent en dit is onjuiste tagging. Graag reactie
eggie (2018-03-31 12:48:03+00:00): De info heb ik naar de adresnode verplaatst.
Ivo96 (2018-03-31 12:54:16+00:00): Sorry, ik zal er volgende keer rekening mee houden. Bedankt voor het verbeteren!
eggie (2018-03-31 13:03:02+00:00): Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen. In het begin worden edits van starters gevolgd... ook om te helpen. OSM is wel gelijk in het diepe.
tuxayo (2019-03-29 11:45:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Est-ce qu'il y a besoin du "landuse=commercial" ou est-ce une erreur? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575033386
tuxayo (2019-05-27 11:08:17+00:00): Note ouverte sur le sujet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1792769
demon_box (2018-03-31 14:41:30+00:00): ciao, hai inserito questa boscaglia
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575033562
ma con il bordo sei andato sopra il landuse=forest
i confini dei 2 landuse devono combaciare ma non sovrapporsi, riesci gentilmente a sistemare?
grazie
demon_box (2018-03-31 14:51:22+00:00): ciao, anche qui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575034497
natural=scrub con i bordi sovrasta gli altri landuse
stai mappando tanti landuse ed è ottimo ma devi essere più preciso, per favore ;-)
eggie (2018-03-31 12:41:00+00:00): oke.. lijkt me een goede edit
demon_box (2018-03-31 14:53:00+00:00): ciao, anche qui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575028513
landuse=farmland sopra landuse=quarry
puoi sistemare per favore?
grazie
literan (2018-04-02 10:22:56+00:00): Добрый день. Если вы не прекратите добавлять в базу выдуманные магазины и автобусные станции посреди воды, ваша учетная запись будет заблокирована
BCNorwich (2018-03-31 13:44:36+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've removed your residential area additions as this whole area is already mapped as residential within Relation: 1966806 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1966806#map=15/52.0824/1.1319&layers=N
Regards Bernard
bxl-forever (2018-06-03 16:16:57+00:00): Hallo,
"operator=Stad Brussel"???
Dit is op Anderlecht → ofwel beheerd door het Brussels Gewest of door de gemeente.
demon_box (2018-03-31 14:44:56+00:00): ciao, anche qui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575037404
i confini di landuse=farmland si sovrappongono al landuse=forest,
riesci a sistemare?
grazie
demon_box (2018-03-31 14:46:58+00:00): ciao, anche qui 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575038526
natural=scrub sopra il bordo di landuse=forest
continui a fare questo errore, puoi per favore fare più attenzione?
lo correggi?
grazie ;-)
eggie (2018-03-31 13:01:33+00:00): Klopt als een bus.. Verder is het zo als er een blauw rond bord staat met de wandelaar dan is het fotway.. in andere gevallen highway=path. Maar in bewoond gebied is het meestal footway.. ook zonder bord.
VA00 (2018-06-13 18:59:48+00:00): Czy można to już zamknąć: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1002608

?
elgon (2018-06-13 19:20:14+00:00): Tak, oczywiście. Przejazdu tam nie ma.
VA00 (2018-06-14 09:21:28+00:00): A rowerem?
elgon (2018-06-14 19:19:21+00:00): Teoretycznie można, ale jest bardzo stromo.
user_5359 (2018-04-01 14:17:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of oneway=reversible (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#Time_conditional_restrictions). Exists these time conditional restrictions? Please add them.
maraf24 (2018-04-05 19:23:41+00:00): A na jakiej podstawie doszło do tej poprawy? Policzyłeś sam, że jest 14?
maro21 (2018-10-11 20:33:04+00:00): Tak.
maraf24 (2018-10-11 20:54:33+00:00): Przez pół roku miałem już okazję naocznie to sprawdzić:)
W JOSMie w takich sytuacjach jako source wpisuję "survey" i wiadomo, że dane pochodzą z terenu.
maro21 (2018-10-11 20:59:15+00:00): Znaczy sprawdzasz jeszcze po mnie, bo myśłałeś, że nie sprawdziłem w terenie?

Nie dodaję source do każdej edycji, bo to zajmuje czas.

Rowery można nawet policzyć jadąc tramwajem, bo tam stoi na światłach chwilę.
maraf24 (2018-10-11 21:47:31+00:00): Po to się pytam tutaj, by nie sprawdzać, tym bardziej, że kiedyś były niezgodności z tym co Nextbike raportował u siebie w systemie a z tym, co było w terenie.
Tutaj było kiedyś 15, ciekawe dlaczego 1 stanowisko usunęli.
aufachse (2018-03-31 17:34:08+00:00): Hallo erja,

Du hast bei Deinem edit den Wald, zwischen Riedenburg und Hemau, komplett "abgeholzt" und ein ein paar Meter nach Osten verschoben. Habe mir erlaubt, den vorherigen Zustand wiederherzustellen [2]. Irgendwo hattest Du einen Zaun (barrier=fence) gemapped. Der ist bei dem Revert leider verloren gegangen. Vielleicht ergänzt Du das wieder.

Sollten bei dem revert Kollateralschäden entstanden sein, bin ich für Hinweise dankbar (, falls jemanden etwas auffällt [TM]).

Happy Easter mapping.

[1] https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=57688151

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57694551#map=12/49.0002/11.7092&layers=N