piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eerib (2022-08-05 16:50:35+00:00): Hello Mark,

No, I am not threatening to deactivate your account. Only the Data Working Group has the power to do such a thing.

I'm going to reiterate my previous comment:

If you still want the trail altered then please contact then Data Working Group with your request.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

If you delete the trail without contacting the Data Working Group or providing verification of the deactivation works then I will revert your edits and report your account to the Data Working Group again.

Regards, eerib
bookwus65 (2022-08-05 17:13:20+00:00): I know that you're not able to deactivate my account, but you are implying that you will take steps to have that done (which you previously did) if I don't bend to your will.

If you're colleagues are any sort of officials within the DWV or BC Parks, they should have some sort of public contact information and be available for comment.
eerib (2022-08-05 17:50:36+00:00): Hello Mark,

The Data Working Group (data, “ат”openstreetmap“ԁοт”org) is authorised by the Foundation to deal with accusations of copyright infringement, imports, and serious disputes and vandalism. If you believe I am threatening you or breaking the code of conduct then please contact them. If you would like to have the trail altered then please contact them to help resolve this dispute.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

If you delete the trail without contacting the Data Working Group or providing verification of the deactivation works then I will revert your edits and report your account to the Data Working Group again.

Regards, eerib
bookwus65 (2022-08-05 18:40:11+00:00): I'm trying to get to the bottom of whom you spoke to regarding this trail, but you seem to be unwilling to cooperate. You've been given false information, so others may have been too (now and in the future).

I would really like to resolve this, so please DM me with some sort of contact information.

I don't expect you to divulge your profession here, but at this point, your "colleagues" could be anything from members of a hiking association to taxi drivers.

Replying with the same message telling me to contact the Data Working Group is simply shunning me, and not attempting to resolve anything.
eerib (2022-08-05 18:52:02+00:00): Hello Mark,

Please contact the Data Working Group if you would like to resolve the dispute.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

Regards, eerib
bookwus65 (2022-08-05 19:12:04+00:00): Sure, but I'll delete the trail in the meantime (to limit potential issues as it's mid-Summer and there are a lot of people out there) until this matter can be resolved. Especially as the Working Group are volunteers and I don't know if the process will take hours, days, weeks or even months.
eerib (2022-08-08 21:24:45+00:00): An update for anyone reading,

1. I filed a DWG report on Friday with details about my surveys of the area and details of the past vandalism in this immediate area. I received a response back that the issue has been sent to a USA-based DWG member.

2. On Friday I emailed (from my OSM-specific email) West Vancouver Parks, BC Parks, and the Friends of Cypress Provincial Park asking if any official or unofficial trail decommissioning work has been done in the area this year. I received a response today from the District of West Vancouver Parks Coordinator saying: "West Vancouver Parks has not undertaken any trail decommissions in this area. The upper portion of this area is BC Parks jurisdiction, so it may be worth checking with them as well."
ElliottPlack (2022-08-11 13:12:11+00:00): The DWG has investigated and agrees with eerib. Further, we discovered many attempts to obscure trails here, going back some years. Bookwus is now blocked, as will be all of the related accounts: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119965285

- Elliott
Data Working Group
OSM Foundation
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
eerib (2022-08-17 20:07:34+00:00): An update for anyone reading,

I received a reply from BC Parks today, specifically the "BC Parks Information Team". The message says "Thank you for your email. I can confirm that no trail decommissioning has occurred in Cypress Park recently."

I am ok with forwarding my correspondence with District of West Vancouver and/or BC Parks to anyone that is interested.

Thank you to Elliot and the DWG team for quickly resolving the vandalism of trail features in this area.
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
Hubert van de Werve (2022-08-03 10:40:33+00:00): Le chemin du moulin (si tel est son nom ?) doit être coupé après la dernière maison !!!
PERSONNE ne peu y passer, c'est propriété privée (procès de 30 ans !) derrière l'église !!!
LySioS (2022-08-03 11:13:49+00:00): Bonjour Hubert,
Je vous ai envoyé un message hier via la messagerie d'OpenStreetMap que vous n'avez pas dû recevoir.

Concernant le chemin privé, je l'ai rétabli et marqué comme étant privé.  C'est l'usage habituel : l’affichage est différent et les applications GPS basé sur OSM ne s’y rendront pas. Cette information se précise dans Accès > tous > private. Si on le supprime, il risque d'être rajouté dans le futur par un autre contributeur sans le caractère privé.

Concernant le chemin du Moulin, je vois que le contributeur qui l'a rajouté s'est servi du cadastre. Savez-vous s'il existe une plaque de rue confirmant le nom ?

Dernier point,  j’ai laissé des notes sur la carte concernant quelques équipements de la commune qui me posent question (difficile de cartographier à distance !), pouvez-vous y répondre ?

lien vers les notes : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/42.52382/2.63127&layers=N

Merci et n’hésitez pas si vous avez des questions.
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
silversurfer83 (2022-08-05 12:27:10+00:00): Hi
das Löschen wird leider nicht viel bringen, da offensichtlich vorhandene Wege vom nächsten Nutzer wieder angelegt werden oder ein anderer macht die Löschung rückgängig.

Daher zunächst meine Frage: Warum genau wurden die Wege gelöscht?

-silversurfer83
ma-rt-in (2022-08-14 11:41:18+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe nun das CS 124410067 zurückgesetzt mit CS 124883934.

vg
scai (2022-08-14 12:58:21+00:00): 👍
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
highflyer74 (2022-08-03 06:38:29+00:00): Moin und danke für deinen Beitrag!

Kleiner Hinweis: ein foot=yes ist nicht notwendig, da highway=path dies bereits impliziert.

Eine Übersicht darüber, welche Art von Wegen welche Verkehrsmittel bereits implizit beinhalten, findest du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Viele Grüße!
Moritz Ferdinand Rocker (2022-08-03 08:36:41+00:00): Hi, danke für das Feedback! Da lese ich mich mal ein. Soll ich auch im weiteren Park die unnötigen Tags entfernen? Herzlicher Gruß
highflyer74 (2022-08-03 10:07:38+00:00): Moin! Das kann man machen, ist aber nicht notwendig, da man nicht wirklich etwas verbessert (es sei denn natürlich, dass etwas grob falsch ist). 

Wenn man einen Weg neu anlegt, oder sich einen bestehenden Weg nochmal vor Ort anschaut, kann man ggf. vorhandene Beschilderung verwenden, um das Tagging zu verbessern. Von den oben erwähnten angenommenen Standardwerten mal abgesehen, gibt es dann dieses Tool http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/, welches dir dabei hilft, die richtigen Tags zu ermitteln.

Schönen Tag!
Moritz Ferdinand Rocker (2022-08-03 12:41:18+00:00): Super Tool, danke!
marc__marc (2022-10-12 12:25:54+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083334488
what's you meaning for ref:signed ?
if a sign exist on the ground with the ref, it's simply ref=Bf Luisenthal|NEA|NS-Raum

Regards,
Marc
nw520 (2022-10-12 13:00:11+00:00): Hello Marc,
That was probably the result of unfortunate autocomplete. Thanks for pointing this out.
marc__marc (2022-10-12 13:37:49+00:00): Thank you also for fixing it
user_3022894 (2022-08-09 17:22:07+00:00): Hi sundew,
erst einmal vielen, vielen Dank dafür, dass du so großflächig/weiträumig und so regelmäßig Briefkästen, Telefone, Bushaltestellen usw. prüfst und taggst bzw. aktualisierst.

Zu den Telefonen habe ich einen kleinen Hinweis:
Ist dir aufgefallen, dass die meisten Telefone der Telekom (alle die Telefone mit WLAN und alle die mit dem kleinen Display) keine Kreditkarten mehr annehmen?

Die Telekom hat diesen Service leider eingestellt...
(Auch, wenn zumindest zum Teil die Kreditkarten auf den Aushängen an den Telefonen vor Ort sogar noch abgebildet sind).

Daher meine Bitte: Könntest du evtl. bei zukünftigen Besichtigungen das payment:credit_cards=yes bei den gesehenen Telefonen löschen?
Das wäre wirklich super.

Vielen Dank!

Viele Grüße
Lukas
sundew (2022-08-09 18:02:51+00:00): Hallo Lukas,

wenn du dir dessen sicher bist, werde ich gern das Kreditkartentag in Zukunft entfernen. Inzwischen ist bei mindestens einigen dieser Telefone auch der Telefonkartenschlitz verriegelt und es funktioniert neben Muenzen nur noch die als "Telefonkarte Komfort" verkaufte Nachfolgevariante mit 16-stelliger Nummerneingabe. Aber das ist eine andere Baustelle ..

Btw, ich wollte dir ja letztes Jahr nochmal intensiver auf deine Basistelefonanfrage antworten, weil ich die regelmaessig pruefe. Leider sind seitdem von den wenigen verbliebenen die meisten ganz entfernt worden. Sehr schade ..

LG
sundew
user_3022894 (2022-08-10 07:15:54+00:00): Hi,

Danke für die schnelle Antwort! :)

Oh, interessant, das mit den Telefonkarten und dem Leseschlitz ist mir neu. Kann aber sicher gut sein, der Service wird immer weniger irgendwie...

Ich kann ja mal beobachten, ob das demnächst auch bei Telefonen in meiner Umgebung kommt.
‐-------------'
Jap, genau, das Kreditkartentag kannst du dann gerne entfernen.

Bezüglich der Basistelefone: Ganz genau, da liegst du richtig, in meiner Region habe ich auch eine große "Abbauwelle" beobachten können. Das ist wirklich sehr schade. Es hat mit einer Getzesänderung zu tun; seit Ende 2021 haben Kommunen kein Mitspracherecht mehr bei der Entscheidung, ob ein öffentliches Telefon erhalten bleiben soll.

Dieses Mitspracherecht hatte bis letztes Jahr vielen verbliebenen Basistelefonen noch das "Leben gerettet". Das ist jetzt entfallen.

Danke auf jeden Fall für die Info, dann weiß ich Bescheid, dass es in deiner Region auch so aussieht.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
trigpoint (2022-08-04 20:33:59+00:00): Since when have pedestrians been prohibited from the A500. 

I travelled along it last weekend and no new signs had appeared.
Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle (2022-08-04 20:59:14+00:00): At the time I made these, I wasn't aware this was meant to be about legality rather than safety - feel free to revert the changeset if you like.
trigpoint (2022-08-05 13:13:30+00:00): I have removed foot=no from these roads.

Cheers Phil
Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle (2022-08-05 13:26:48+00:00): Okay, my apologies for the noise.
tastrax (2022-08-10 07:44:27+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
alex_lofi (2022-08-02 22:12:27+00:00): El recorrido cubierto por el centro de Granada puede contener errores aunque he intentado que sea lo más correcto posible con la información que he encontrado. Especialmente bajo el Paseo del Salón y en su cruce con el Río Darro puede que existan errores.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124411181
snakeplants (2022-08-03 21:24:51+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapillary
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-04 20:11:17+00:00): Necesitaba revertir algunos de tus cambios de hoy a ayer, porque borraste y desalineaste varios carriles en Istmina. Debes haber usado imágenes muy desalineadas para hacer lo que hiciste. Como sucedió aquí: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124411754 quedó totalmente desalineado. ¿Qué imágenes usaste para hacer esto?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-04 20:15:38+00:00): Desafortunadamente, esta ubicación contiene muchas nubes en las imágenes que se ofrecen a los colaboradores. Tal vez pueda usar la capa Sentinel 2021 que está un poco borrosa ya que esta capa está muy lejos pero alineada. También puede habilitar la capa de alta resolución de Strava, describí en un tutorial cómo hacer esto: https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3, no tendrá todos los carreteras, pero está muy bien alineado y sirve para cartografiar lugares por donde ya han pasado los deportistas. Se utiliza para mapear dónde hay nubes o carreteras nuevas o para comprobar si la capa de la imagen está bien alineada.
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 20:29:43+00:00): Hola, estas nuevas vias las realice con la aplicación GPS Tracker en mi teléfono y las cree aquí, Voy a revisar bien la alineación con Strava y la actualizo, o déjame saber si ya las actualizaste
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 21:32:19+00:00): Huy hermano pero usted como va a borrar el trabajo de casi 2 dias agregando lugares y calles nuevas realizadas con el tracker solo porque no estaban bien alineadas, era simplemente alinearlas. Porque las vias las realice a como me salían en el track GPS. Si no va a contribuir tampoco perjudique el trabajo de los demás, Yo soy colombiano y vivo en este pueblo y llega usted de brasil que no creo ni que conozca Colombia y por desalineadas 3 vias borre todo, si me parece muy mal hecho
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 21:35:49+00:00): por pendejadas como las que usted hace es que casi nadie contribuye con los mapas de OSM
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-04 22:20:17+00:00): Estás diciendo que borré lo que hiciste. Pero en realidad borraste la alineación que había hecho. Soy de Brasil, pero te puedo asegurar que agregué mil veces más carriles que tú en Colombia, así que esto no es un argumento. Lo que has hecho no se siente como algo hecho con un rastreador, ya que la capa de Strava a menudo es bastante precisa y has borrado mucho del trabajo bien hecho que se había hecho allí para reemplazarlo con algo totalmente desalineado. Entiende, ¡algo totalmente desaliñado es inútil! Pero eres bienvenido al proyecto, solo ten más cuidado con lo que vas a hacer, ¡especialmente si vas a eliminar lo que ya se ha hecho!
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 22:53:46+00:00): Olvidalo, Yo vivo en ese pueblo, Eliminaste 2 barrios completos con calles nuevas y barrios que crecieron, Y yu dices que a lo loco sin conocer siquiera porque tienes no se cuantas ediciones asi a lo loco sin conocer los lugares y crees que vas a saber mas de que calles hay y no hay que alguien que vive en el lugar que esta editando. Hay que ser muy idiota para pensar eso. Acaso tu quien eres, El dueño de OSM? Habia organizado puentes, lugares, vias que son solo peatonales y no de paso de carro y tu volviste a ponerlas de paso de vehiculos
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 22:57:10+00:00): Revisa bien lo que hacer y como lo haces, porque las vias se podian alinear sin ningun problema, pero volver a crearlas una por una las nuevas vias quita mucho tiempo, No creas que con esas pendejadas contribuyes a OSM, antes perjudicas, asi lleves 100.000 o 1Millon de ediciones, No edite a borre lo que usted no sabe y no esta en la facilidad de comprobar, RESPETE EL TRABAJO AJENO
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 22:59:41+00:00): Y bajese de esa nube de super editor que no lo es, la cantidad de ediciones no lo combierten en nada si no son ediciones que usted puede comprobar y garantizar
Leo Slager (2022-08-03 23:00:18+00:00): Partly reverted your changeset due to severe damage in Santpoort (NL).
Leo Slager (2022-08-03 23:02:24+00:00): Please do not combine changes  in the Netherlands wich changes in Afghanistan.
ViceEdit (2022-08-03 03:04:02+00:00): Should display "Student Housing S(a,b,c,d,d,g,j,k,l)" instead of "Student Housing (a,b,c,d,d,g,j,k,l)"
MatthieuMartin (2022-08-03 21:17:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124453792
DressyPear4 (2022-08-04 13:57:49+00:00): Olá, motorway_link são apenas vias que fazem a conexão com a motorway, logo essas rotatórias não devem usar essa classificação
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124413228
John Mahoney (2022-08-03 00:44:45+00:00): Trace exported from MTB Project
adiatmad (2022-08-04 04:38:37+00:00): Halo. Apakah area penggembalaan ini sampai melewati Jalan Raya Lintas Batas? 
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1083361506)