piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
highflyer74 (2018-07-17 08:48:28+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall passt landuse=basin nicht ganz (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=basin?uselang=de).

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
LeChuck11 (2018-07-17 20:09:17+00:00): Hi, 
Danke für die Anmerkung. Was wäre denn richtig? Es handelt sich um ein Schwimmbecken aus den 60ern, das seid 30 Jahren brach liegt. Es wird nach wie vor von einem Bach gespeist und hat einen Überlauf in einen zweiten, niedrigeren Bach. 

Gruß
highflyer74 (2018-07-18 07:50:06+00:00): Hallo und danke für Deine Rückmeldung! Ich hatte gerade gesehen, dass Du nur den Namen dazu getaggt hattest und landuse=basin schon vorher da war. Egal. Das heisst, das Becken ist nicht mehr in Betrieb und da badet niemand mehr? Dann könnte man z.B. old_name=* statt name=* nehmen. Ist es denn ständig mit Wasser gefüllt? Und noch eine Frage zum Schluss: besteht dort, wo Sternbach und Violenbach aufeinandertreffen eine Verbindung zum Graben östlich davon? Schönen Tag Dir!
highflyer74 (2018-08-30 08:45:32+00:00): Hallo nochmal. Könntest Du Dich bezüglich meiner obigen Fragen noch kurz melden? Dann können wir das abschliessen...
LeChuck11 (2018-08-30 20:01:52+00:00): Hallo!
genau, das Becken ist mindestens 30 Jahre außer Betrieb. Dann änder ich das. Der Sternbach geht nach Oste weiter, allerdings treffen die beiden nicht aufeinander. Unter dem Violenbach ist ein Tunnel, durch den der Sternbach fließt.
highflyer74 (2018-08-31 12:43:47+00:00): Danke :-)
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-06-30 15:27:01+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you are currently using Bing imagery for Bamako... Please consider using ESRI World imagery as it is more recent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60301923
Matthew Darwin (2018-09-17 17:50:06+00:00): 7 William St W has a weird postcode.  Can you check it?
Omegatherion (2018-07-01 14:03:18+00:00): Hallo. Ein Street_cabinet kann kein Building sein. Aufgrund der Größe hab ich mal buildung=service gesetzt
Discostu36 (2018-07-01 19:53:56+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, der mich aber ehrlich gesagt etwas verwirrt. Ein street_cabinet kann kein building sein, du hast aber trotzdem einen building-Tag gesetzt?
Omegatherion (2018-07-01 21:08:47+00:00): die mm=street_cabinet tags habe ich dabei entfernt
Discostu36 (2018-07-01 21:13:13+00:00): Übersehen, sorry
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-06-30 15:26:38+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you are currently using Bing imagery for Bamako... Please consider using ESRI World imagery as it is more recent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60302324
Kuritsyn Roman (2018-12-08 08:12:21+00:00): Приветствую, откуда дровишки по названиям, опять яндекс?
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mbethke (2018-07-02 16:02:38+00:00): Please don't tag POIs with "names" that are not actually their name.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
luiswoo (2018-06-30 15:19:24+00:00): Сергей44ПСЧ, вам нравится заниматься мартышкиным трудом? Вот как делаются ЛЮБЫЕ границы в OSM https://yadi.sk/i/VLSOZ3W33Yd9rY — нет микрофона, и так вроде всё понятно. Выделение членов границы делалось через shift-w и просто через шифт. В видео были просто  скопированы теги, но скорей всего это должно выглядеть так https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8419169
Я заметил, что, внезапно, границы этих самых выездов подозрительно совпадают с административными границами. Так вот, административные границы в Ростовской области отмечены ПОЛНОСТЬЮ ВСЕ. И я буду откатывать весь этот дублирующий мусор. Пускай криворукий администратор Карта01 включает поддержку мультиполигонов и не выёживатся. Я насмотрелся на этот ад с дублями в Краснодарском крае, такое "счастье" здесь не нужно.
Сергей44ПСЧ (2018-07-01 04:44:05+00:00): Здравствуйте, в Аксайском районе у нас одна федеральная часть, и наш район выезда и является границами административного района к сожалению. Т.е. все поселки входящие в состав аксайского района находятся по защитой нашей части. К сожалению, для того чтобы сделать планшет водоисточников необходимо чтобы была нанесена граница выезда нашей ПСЧ. Первый раз ранимаюсь нанесением, извините если что не так. И да, выглядеть это должно именно так, как вы указали, просто не знал как правильно это делать. Не мартышкин труд, а от того что мало опыта в этой области.
luiswoo (2018-07-01 13:00:16+00:00): Я создал сейчас именно полигон — так как для вас, без него (полигона, а мультиполигон не поддерживатеся), сайт карта01 более чем полностью бесполезен — нет планшетов, списков, если я верно понял содержимое этого сайта.
Вряд ли карта01 сделает поддержу мультиполигонов, ему и с краснодарского края, видимо, не плохо живётся.
Сергей44ПСЧ (2018-07-02 07:04:02+00:00): Добрый день. я правильно понял, что наша граница теперь будет отображаться на карте 01? или мне нужно связываться с администратором карты, чтобы он сделал поддержку мультиполигонов?( я просто "чайник" в этом деле
luiswoo (2018-07-02 07:20:43+00:00): День добрый, будет https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603989977 — полностью соответствует требованиям сайта карта01, и находится на том месте, где должна быть.
Сергей44ПСЧ (2018-07-02 07:23:31+00:00): Спасибо вам огромное за помощь, и за то что все разъяснили.
ForstEK (2018-07-01 22:01:54+00:00): Bravo! You just delete indiscriminately both changed and newly created objects without asking and without understanding, and by the way, I spent a lot of time editing and creating them, verified and based on the imagery, which is what it says in comments on changeset. With all due respect to your experience, the revert of this changeset is pure vandalism.
This package of edits was created as part of the participation in the project http://streak.osmz.ru/ where there is a task to create a changeset with a large bounding box - it is not prohibited. If you understand and appreciate my work, please turn off this revert.
roptat (2018-07-02 14:23:35+00:00): Salut !

Vu la description, le bon tag est shop=farm. shop=agrarian est décrit dans le wiki comme un magasin de produits pour entretenir sa ferme (pesticides, graines à planter, ...). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dagrarian

Il y a peut-être un problème avec la traduction d'OsmAnd ? Quel était le type d'objet que tu as sélectionné ?

Je me suis permis de corriger ;)
morvil (2018-07-02 22:39:22+00:00): Bonjour, la correction est bonne, merci de l'avoir réalisée. Je n'ai pas été très rigoureux lors de ma saisie. Pour info dans OsmAnd "shop=agrarian" est traduit "agricultural store" et "shop=farm" est traduit "Vente à la ferme", ce qui reste explicite.
Merci de ta vigilance ;-)
abakus_uploader (2018-06-30 22:30:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
atcomapper (2018-06-30 15:15:53+00:00): Note that postal addresses are normally represented as nodes (points) in Denmark, not added directly to buildings.
Djaa9 (2018-06-30 15:33:52+00:00): Okay. Should I remove the addresses again for the purpose of consistency. I see that most other buildings also feature the generic building type and not the house type. Should building be used instead?
Hjart (2018-06-30 16:59:26+00:00): autoAWS (vores automatiske adresseimport) kan indtil videre kun håndtere adresser på noder og kan derfor ikke opdatere adresseinfo angivet på bygninger. Desuden kan det  i visse tilfælde være en udfordring når en adresse er angivet både på en bygning og på en node.
Det er fint at angive bygningstype. De fleste bygninger er kun angivet som "generisk bygning" af nemhedsgrunde (det er af større betydning at bygninger overhovedet er tegnet ind).
Владимир К (2018-10-21 10:42:08+00:00): Добрый день!
Вы перерисовали развязку с кольцом на комсомольской площади. Она не совпадает со снимками. Развязку перестроили?
Денисий (2018-10-21 21:01:22+00:00): Добрый вечер.
Перестроили, клумба стала значительно больше, добавили разделитель (треугольник). Теперь движение стало больше похоже на круговое.
gileri (2018-06-30 14:53:21+00:00): Fin du mesage de changeset : "géométrie approximative bâtiment INL, et correction tags accès"
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-06-30 15:26:30+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you are currently using Bing imagery for Bamako... Please consider using ESRI World imagery as it is more recent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60304079
NKA (2018-06-30 19:54:02+00:00): You deleted several lakes and islands. I have reverted.
Vitru (2018-07-01 10:00:02+00:00): I've deleted lakes which were not correct on today's imagery and CORINE forests which were overlapping lakes and the fjord.
Firefishy (2018-07-03 10:22:04+00:00): Nicely done!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
seav (2022-01-09 18:49:11+00:00): Hi, Rally. May I know why you deleted the following 2 service ways?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166262771
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166119448

These exist based on my local knowledge.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:11:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
dieterdreist (2020-08-02 21:10:24+00:00): Hi, I just noticed you surveyed in 2018 that here are no traffic lights: node 5730658123
I thought I remember that there are, can you please confirm? Thank you, Martin
aceman444 (2020-08-02 21:46:08+00:00): Hi, I have put source=bing on the crossing, while often you can't see traffic lights on bing, so it may be a mistake that I marked it as uncontrolled. I can't resurvey the spot any time soon, so you can fix it up if you remember better.
dieterdreist (2020-08-02 22:00:58+00:00): all right, I’ll fix it. Please do not add crossing details like crossing=* from aerial imagery, it is not possible to distinguish traffic light controlled crossings from zebra crossings in Rome, because all have zebra markings. Thank you, Martin
aceman444 (2020-08-02 22:12:40+00:00): Correct, I may have tried to add the zebra and added crossing=uncontrolled too by mistake. Thanks
PT-53 (2019-06-03 06:53:45+00:00): Hallo aytfadc,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz diese Ausfahrt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603767807/history nei eingezeichnet. Ein Tag zuvor war diese Ausfahrt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603468294/history eingezeichnet worden.
Was ist richtig?
Fragende Grüße
opendcc (2019-06-03 07:20:07+00:00): Hallo,

momentan (vermutlich bis etwa 10-2019) wird der Verkehr der B12 über die eigentlich bereits fertige Anschlußstelle der A94 geführt. D.h. hier kommt sich 'voreilendes' Autobahntagging und aktuelle Straßenführung etwas in die Quere. Sinnvoll wäre es, da halt noch nicht Autobahn zu taggen. Auch die seltsame Einbahnregelung auf der St2084 ist nur temporär. Im Übrigen komme ich da täglich zweimal vorbei und habe bereits (langsam aufgenommene) GPS-Tracks der Highways hochgeladen.

Servus Wolfgang
Pander (2019-01-15 10:45:16+00:00): This location of Tesla (and some other locations of Tesla) have actually different types of sockets.
eggie (2018-06-30 18:11:54+00:00): What do you mean now again with "operator Bert "? Please respond.
eggie (2018-07-01 05:25:52+00:00): ... en operator G.de Bruin?
Osm1980 (2018-08-12 17:49:36+00:00): سلام از ی فارسی استفاده کنید در نامگذاری اسامی نه ی عربی با دو نقطه زیرش
jpol (2018-08-13 20:12:29+00:00): Chodnik przy Jarockiej/Jaroszyka został w tym zestawie wystrzelony gdzieś w kosmos. Cofnąłem changeset w tym zakresie.
serdelll (2018-08-20 22:29:20+00:00): dzięki za czujność i wyłapanie błędu
GerdP (2018-10-08 06:34:00+00:00): Moin!
Ich verstehe das seltsame highway=* nicht. Warum nicht highway=path oder cycleway?
Mölln (2019-04-01 12:32:07+00:00): Die Bezeichnung war in einem Forenbeitrag zu lesen gewesen. Es geht um die eindeutige Zuweisung einer Straße als Fahrradstrasse. Gibt es mittlerweile einen besseren Tag? Danke für den Hinweis.
GerdP (2019-04-01 14:24:32+00:00): Wenn Du irgendwo highway=* liest, dann ist damit immer gemeint, dass Du den passenden Typ verwenden sollst, niemals * selbst.
Zu Radwegen schau mal hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
gileri (2018-06-30 21:26:55+00:00): Bonjour,

Il me semble pas qu'il y ait d'interdiction formelle de circuler à cheval sur cet axe, et j'ai déjà vu la police à cheval dans le parc.
sjreynolds143 (2019-03-11 10:51:50+00:00): Hi Thomas,
Can you tell me, please, what the evidence is for a "No Right Turn" restriction from Shefford High Street into South Bridge Road? I have bus  registrations direct from an operator that suggests that they do do that, and I cannot see anything that would suggest that the road layout would forbid it.

Thanks.
Stuart
◪ Jarv (2019-03-19 08:39:15+00:00): That must of been a mistake.
Corrected
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-07-01 19:38:59+00:00): Dzięki! Nazwa wyglądała na brakującą a srawdzenie nie było mi po drodze (a nie można kopiować z innych map w tym Google Maps więc wiedza lokalna lub sprawdzenie na miejscu były potrzebne).
trigpoint (2018-07-08 13:31:42+00:00): Hi, since when to the Co-op have pound shops? Also is that its correct name? and please capitalise names properly.
zors1843 (2018-07-01 07:50:50+00:00): Misplaced ? I created a new entry here :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5731733853
Is that right ?
Kind regards
corfede (2018-07-02 12:00:01+00:00): Ciao usbe, i fabbricati importati dalla CTR Puglia sono ben posizionati, pertanto non possono essere spostati in base alle foto satellitari; in particolare le foto Bing sono disallineate in questa zona. Ho proceduto al ripristino dei fabbricati. Grazie, Federico
usbe (2018-07-02 13:24:46+00:00): ok! grazie
will_p (2018-06-30 21:09:16+00:00): The deletions you are making look a bit heavy handed. As well as the shop and name tags you are also deleting some addresses. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2942782326/history 
Empty shop units still have addresses, so they should be left in place. In addition, I certainly find updating shops quicker and easier if the empty units and addresses are still there.

Has this edit been discussed anywhere? It possibly falls under the code of conduct for automated edits: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
seanking2919 (2018-07-01 02:35:43+00:00): 1. I was doing the edits manually. They were not automated.
2. If you want me to keep the marks of the units with their addresses, I can try to see what I can do.
seanking2919 (2018-07-01 02:42:23+00:00): That is if there is any way to reverse my own edits so I change things.
seanking2919 (2018-07-01 02:51:22+00:00): Does look like some of the now-vacant units didn't have addresses initially listed. But I can look into individual nodes deleted in the U.S. and U.K. so far to see if it's possible to place some back in as vacant units with an address.
Glenn Plas (2018-07-05 22:27:11+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for joining OSM.  I have a few remarks on your contributions.

First of all: for a parking, fee=no is implicitly assumed,  no need to add this.  Thanks for changing the name of the Okay to the new Colruyt.  The opening hours are still wrong as the latter is open until 20:00.

You also change a path into a footway and then start adding implicit transportation modes, here as well a footway is not a motorway, so it's assumed that no cars will pass.  There is no need to add all those.  ( Brandvoetweg ).   Most of the work you have changed is from very very experienced mappers and you have made a few mistakes.  It would be great if you join us on the osm.be chat https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org to discuss your edits you're planning until you know better how this works.   There are quite some errors and assumptions you make.  Changing the name of a sport facility into 'Sporthal' most often does not make any sense. This one too is totally wrong and you changed the dynamics by removing the area tag:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90859502

Would appreciate you joining our community online but we need to assure quality , so please refrain from changing things that are complicated, start by mapping simple things, read the wiki first and better, ask us questions in the riot channel or on IRC
gazember8 (2018-07-15 11:02:40+00:00): Ahoj, Rick. V tejto sade zmien si pri Tescu Extra v Košiciach vyznačil tri objekty ako oblasť pre autokemping. Skutočne sa tam nachádza alebo to bol iba omyl? :)
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603855512
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603855513
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603855514
Rick Richards (2018-07-15 18:50:31+00:00): Ahoj :-) oh zabudol som, že som to urobil takto.. moja chyba. Na týchto miestach som chcel vyznačiť parkovanie pre autobusy ale nevedel som ako to odlíšiť od klasického parkoviska. Nevieš ako sa to dá? :-)
kayle (2018-07-17 05:02:58+00:00): Asi len pridať 
motorcar=no
bus=yes
Len priamo na osm.org to nie je odlíšené, Tam sa mierne inak zobrazuje (viac priesvitnejšie) keď je tam napr. access=private.
Ale aj keď to nie je vidieť na osm.org, odporúčam zaznačiť. Nejaká mapa, alebo navigácia to možno bude vedieť používať.
Viac viď https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dparking#Distinguish_car_park.2Fbus_park
Rick Richards (2018-07-17 13:26:42+00:00): Ďakujem :-)
5m4u9 (2018-07-02 19:35:30+00:00): hola, no deberías poner info personal, utiliza la opción "favoritos o marcadores" de mapsme para poner un punto de recuerdo para la casa de tu padre