piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Eugene Schava (2016-12-26 13:53:06+00:00): какая необходимость менять name на русский язык?
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 17:22:37+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 17:26:52+00:00): https://www.dropbox.com/s/kmi8935law46c9k/2016-12-24_18-15-19.png?raw=1
marczoutendijk (2016-12-24 18:19:32+00:00): Ik heb ni3els ook een mailtje gestuurd.
Er zijn de laatste tijd (helaas) veel Pokemon misdadigers actief...
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 18:34:22+00:00): Misdadiger is een groot woord. Ik denk niet dat Niels weet wat hij deed.
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 17:21:58+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 17:19:28+00:00): revert changeset due to vandalism
Dakon (2017-08-19 08:03:07+00:00): Kann es sein, dass du noch eine ältere Version der OpenRailwayMap-JOSM-Vorlage verwendest? Oder hast du den falschen Wert ausgewählt? Der Validator zeigt jedenfalls an, dass du für ein Licht-Sperrsignal Sh0 eingetragen hast (sollte Hp0 sein).
Ruhrpottkast (2017-08-19 12:38:23+00:00): Welches? Nach 8 Monaten ist die Erinnerung blass.
Ruhrpottkast (2017-08-19 12:50:58+00:00): Es lag daran, dass "Formsignal" statt "Lichtsignal" in JOSM unter Signalbild ausgewählt wurde.
EneaSuper (2016-12-26 17:48:34+00:00): Building=industrial?
Non dovrebbe essere "building=school" o "yes"?
fkv (2016-12-24 18:19:36+00:00): kannst du noch die Höhe (495m laut Laserscan) und Lage (anscheinend nicht auf der Wegkreuzung, sondern eher SW) korrigieren
user_2842609 (2016-12-24 17:00:21+00:00): Merci :) Bon travail :)
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 17:52:00+00:00): Ik heb naar je aanvulllingen op OSM gekeken, kun je wat uitleg geven waar je mee bezig bent?
.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gefelpn8ss49ba3/2016-12-24_18-50-46.png?raw=1
Petuurh (2016-12-24 18:48:19+00:00): Er loopt een klein wandel pad door dit stukje bos, en dit heb ik geprobeerd aan te geven. Ook is er een brug alleen volgens mij heb ik dit niet helemaal goed geplaatst.
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:10:29+00:00): Inderdaad, de brug lag niet geheel op de juiste plek. Deze beter gepositioneerd. Ook het pad zelf iets beter gepositioneerd. Inmiddels heb ik een aantal aanpassingen gedaan.
► highway=footway aangepast naar highway=path
► name= Schoonoord verwijdert van de highway omdat deze al op leisure=park staat. En het pad heeft (vermoedelijk) geen naambordje met deze naam erop.
Succes met mappen.
PS het plaatje in eerste reactie hoort niet bij deze changeset, mijn excuus daarvoor.
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:16:55+00:00): Dit pad begrijp ik niet helemaal.
Loopt dit pad echt op deze manier?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461591740
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u5kdrnflfnovyky/2017-01-15_22-15-00.png?raw=1
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 17:58:51+00:00): Ik heb naar je aanvulllingen op OSM gekeken, kun je wat uitleg geven waar je mee bezig bent? 
.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/may960mg3r5wv02/2016-12-24_18-58-20.png?raw=1
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 13:04:37+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44653698
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 13:08:15+00:00): Reviewed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44653698
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:20:13+00:00): Wat bedoelde je met deze node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4570628184
Een park is meestal een polygon (gebied) en geen losse node.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:33:06+00:00): leisure=park hoort op een gebied, niet op een node. Dit zal een (beginners) vergissing zijn, welke je zeker niet kwalijk wordt genomen. Zal ik je hulp bieden bij het oplossen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4570633972
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:29:46+00:00): Deze (mooie) creatie behoeft volgens mij enige aandacht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461592247
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3puf1n1eketx2rt/2017-01-15_22-27-57.png?raw=1
Ik zie dat je bedoeling goed is, zal ik je hiermee een beetje helpen?
trigpoint (2016-12-24 17:02:03+00:00): Please can you explain this?
Harrymapping (2016-12-24 17:03:26+00:00): There's a small plaque on the wall for Bobby.
trigpoint (2016-12-24 17:30:04+00:00): This is normally mapped as historic=memorial then memorial=plaque. You may want to add some more detail, they usually say a bit more than Bobby.
Cheers Phil
Captain_Spork (2018-02-02 21:36:16+00:00): Hallo Petuurh,

Jouw changeset is alweer iets meer dan een jaar geleden maar ik wilde je toch nog even informeren over de wijzigingen/verbeteringen die ik hier heb aangebracht.

Er waren door jou meerdere park nodes aangebracht en er was landuse omgetagd naar leisure=park. 

Het landuse heb ik weer hersteld en ik heb de overbodige leisure=park nodes verwijderd. Ik heb één nieuwe leisure=park polygon over het landuse heen getekend.

Mijn wijzingsset is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56008297 
In achavi kun je precies zien wat ik heb gewijzigd:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56008297

De reden dat ik jouw changeset tegenkwam is omdat ik door heel Nederland verkeerd getagde parken aan het nalopen ben. 

Mocht je nog vragen hebben hoor ik het graag.

Vriendelijke groet,
Mark
trigpoint (2016-12-24 17:01:39+00:00): Is there really a pear tree in the middle of the road?
Harrymapping (2016-12-24 17:05:05+00:00): So sorry, it's left a bit, there's a residents pear tree at the end of the road.
trigpoint (2016-12-24 17:31:34+00:00): You may want to create new node and tag it as natural=tree, tree=pear.
Just creating a point with a name does nothing.
Cheers Phil
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:26:30+00:00): Wil je bij deze changeset wat hulp?
Dit lijkt me niet echt de werkelijkheid.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97454374
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ifg4un2oi350im0/2017-01-15_22-26-12.png?raw=1
jardin (2016-12-24 17:38:06+00:00): comment télécharger  carte  gps  algerie
TagaSanPedroAko (2016-12-25 15:39:07+00:00): Hi,

I reverted parts of the data you added in your edits for the reason that they cannot be verified using my knowledge. If you keep on adding suspicious data on PNR tracks, I will contact the Data Working Group for possible action against you, like a block.

Regards,
TagaSanPedroAko
TagaSanPedroAko (2016-12-25 15:40:34+00:00): Hi,

I reverted parts of the data you added in your edits for the reason that they cannot be verified using my knowledge. If you keep on adding suspicious data on PNR tracks, I will contact the Data Working Group for possible action against you, like a block.

Regards,
TagaSanPedroAko
TagaSanPedroAko (2016-12-25 15:46:48+00:00): I reverted most of you edits here, and this is the last time I saw you adding suspicious data on Philippine National Railways tracks. I will need to report your activity to the Data Working Group.
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 17:56:20+00:00): Ik heb naar je aanvulllingen op OSM gekeken, kun je wat uitleg geven waar je mee bezig bent? 
.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/a7iyeeywkej0qgu/2016-12-24_18-54-34.png?raw=1
ToeBee (2016-12-24 23:48:59+00:00): Thanks for your additions at the air force base and the park. However you seem to have also changed Wellston Trail form a path to a footway in this changeset which I suspect is an attempt to game Pokemon Go. Please do not do this. OSM is a map of the real world and should not be abused to (maybe) influence a game. I have undone your change to this trail and removed the footway you added on top of the service road in the air force base. You also modified a surface tag from asphalt to a more generic "paved" value which lost information contributed by someone else. Please be careful when modifying existing objects.
infinitezero (2016-12-26 14:56:11+00:00): I have made these changed because the Wellston Trail in "Fountain park" no longer "Dry Lake park", which I have verified this with the city, is paved with concrete not asphalt. Which I go running on it all the time, you can even check google maps to verify what I'm saying is correct. I'm in no way abusing OSM I'm updating the information so OSM can be as accurate as possible. In response to the service road at the the Museum of Aviation it is very rarely used as a service road, they have Traffic cones on it that no longer allows vehicles to drive on them. This is used as a foot path for tourist to walk on to view the planes placed along the path.  The Museum of Aviation isn't a part of Robins Air Force base, it borders it. A Person doesn't need military ID to gain access to the Museum of Aviation.
ToeBee (2016-12-26 19:27:42+00:00): First off: no, we can not use Google maps to check anything. This would be a copyright violation. OSM must only use authorized sources of information or first-hand observation.

The path in the park should not be changed to a foot path. Please read this page on the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway

Specifically: "For multi-use or unspecified paths and trails used by a variety of non-motorised traffic the tag highway=path may be better suited." So that was an obvious change that was made for Pokemon Go that was not appropriate.

Similar with the road in the air base. If it is a road that is primarily for pedestrian traffic but can still carry vehicles then it should likely be labeled as a pedestrian street, not a foot path. And that means changing the classification of the existing service road and not adding a separate foot path that follows the same path.

So it may have been a little strong to call your edits outright vandalism, more just lack of experience and some faulty guidance from reddit. I've been reverting all kinds of Pokemon Go edits over the last few days, some of which are blatant vandalism so I'm not being very nuanced in my changeset comments.

Please feel free to continue editing OSM with on-the-ground knowledge. Just consult the wiki if you have questions. You can also drop in on IRC any time to ask questions. There is a web interface at http://irc.openstreetmap.org/
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 17:53:43+00:00): Ik heb naar je aanvulllingen op OSM gekeken, kun je wat uitleg geven waar je mee bezig bent? 
. 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gefelpn8ss49ba3/2016-12-24_18-50-46.png?raw=1
TagaSanPedroAko (2016-12-25 16:07:27+00:00): Hello,

I reverted parts of the data you added on Philippine National Railways tracks, as they cannot be verified using my local knowledge. This is your final warning for adding data that cannot be verified on the ground, and you are not willing to reply on my comments I added on your previous edits. I will report you to the Data Working Group, as your mapping activity constitute vandalism, unconstructive edits, and possibly, edit warring.
user_2842609 (2016-12-26 15:23:07+00:00): Est ce que ce sont des postes pour les incendies. Merci de nous donner plus de précision. Merci.
eggie (2017-07-08 20:34:30+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... Bij deze..
PB verstuurd met welkom
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 22:02:11+00:00): Hi ivanluu, Arcadia High School (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcadia_High_School_(California)) appears to be a typical American high school, grades 9-12, not a college. So I am changing it back to amenity=school (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool). If your changing it to amenity=college was an attempt to increase PoGo spawn at this school (https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/5jv1c4/i_think_i_figured_out_why_pokemon_never_spawned/), I'd encourage you instead to look for places on our shared OSM map where you can correctly add and tag objects in OSM that match the real world and might induce spawning. If on the other hand, you have a good reason for marking this as a college, please reply here with a comment explaining why. Thanks! David
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 22:07:16+00:00): Hi again ivanluu, from aerial imagery, this clearly does not match the normal use of highway=pedestrian, so I am removing it. Again, if you're aiming to induce PoGo spawning, I'd encourage you to map things correctly, which you think might induce spawning. But fictions are not OK in OSM. Thanks! David
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 21:40:39+00:00): Hi shiftyourparadigm, these objects you added are clearly fictitious, so I have undone your changes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44652344). If you're trying to induce PoGo spawning, I suggest you look for opportunities to correctly map real objects near you that you think might achieve that goal, as that would be a great addition to our shared map. Thanks! David
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-24 21:00:56+00:00): Hi BigSean, welcome to OSM. Could you please explain your edits? I think your changeset should be reverted. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44649627
mueschel (2016-12-28 14:21:03+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4570794979
" Pradanella = Bar Roma"  looks wrong.

Jan
simone_girardelli (2016-12-28 22:26:12+00:00): My error, Predanella is name.
I corrected the tag, thanks for signalling.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 41479648, 41479762, 41481239, 41502691, 41502746, 41502814, 41502829, 41502843, 41502917, 41502958, 41502995, 41503020, 41503039, 41524371, 41524441, 41524454, 41524526, 41524625, 42623197, 42623305, 42624008, 42629378, 42629503, 42629746, 42629778, 42629853.
pyram (2016-12-28 13:34:54+00:00): I saw some error-notes (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/829947)
Please do not upload tests. Would you please revert all tests? OSM is no game ;-)
PhreshBurrito (2016-12-29 05:08:49+00:00): fixed
Thierry1030 (2025-05-25 12:15:13+00:00): hello, according to this note there's no road and path here > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4773712
can you confirmd?
Thierry1030 (2025-05-31 18:17:12+00:00): reminder
StijnRR (2025-06-01 07:17:55+00:00): I haven't been there again. So don't expect me to say something useful 8 years later. Sometimes tracks or paths disappear. Could be the case here.
dvdhoven (2016-12-25 06:25:50+00:00): Hallo Martin,

In de Severenstraat en de Heukestraat zat een gat en wegen waren niet meer verbonden.
Even gezocht op internet, maar niets over onderbreken Severenstraat.
Deze wijzigingsset zegt small mods.
Het onderbreken van een tertiary of secundairy (niet duidelijk wat het is) weg is toch geen small mod meer, naar mijn idee.
Anyway, ik heb alles weer doorverbonden, het fietsknooppuntnetwerk had een probleem.
Als de straat toch onderbroken is, geef dan een berichtje, dan moet de route 07-08 omgelegd worden.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Martin Borsje (2016-12-25 08:39:42+00:00): Beste Dick,

Bedankt voor je bericht en correctie.

Ik ben daar in dat gebied nogal aan het mappen geweest, er is heel wat veranderd dar en nog steeds is het gebied 'dynamisch'.

Hoe het kon gebeuren dat ik de Severenstraat deels 'severed' heb (pun taken) is me een raadsel.

Mijn excuses!

Martin
captain_slow (2017-02-14 14:11:28+00:00): hallo someone12345678
willkommen bie openstreetmap. in openstreetmap werden nur dinge erfasst, welche auch tatsächlich vorhanden sind. also mappe doch bitte keine sachen, von denen du dir vorteile im spiel pokemon go erhoffst.
grüsse
captain_slow
Bonix-Mapper (2017-01-27 00:28:56+00:00): Massaru,

O que você quiz representar com este caminho de pedestres (um retângulo em vermelho no mapa) na Rua dos Iris, próximo Alameda das Boninas?
Joe Schwartz (2016-12-25 06:51:03+00:00): This change should be undone. Ways tagged with natural=coastline must be connected to form closed polygons, and this way isn't part of the proper coastline.
Joe Schwartz (2016-12-25 06:56:36+00:00): See this site for coastline errors: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=-122.09838&lat=37.43640&zoom=18
Joe Schwartz (2016-12-25 18:42:44+00:00): Reverted with changeset 44666255.
mikewerth (2016-12-27 05:25:00+00:00): changeset description is from an earlier unrelated edit
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 04:52:58+00:00): WallOfKron, I have undone (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44655878) this changeset because while editing (apparently goal to add a footway near Treehaven Circle in Lancaster), you accidentally dragged a node in Santa Clarita into a road nearby (http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=2052212907), which messed up a building outline. -David
Parzelle13 (2016-12-27 17:33:15+00:00): Hallo, ist das eine sinnvolle Änderung ?
DD1GJ (2016-12-28 00:17:52+00:00): Natürlich nicht. Ich habe alle Änderungen des Users wegen "Pokemon-Optimierungen"  zürückgesetzt, siehe https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2016-December/113743.html
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 04:36:14+00:00): WallOfKron, I have removed this "footway" inside Lowe's (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44655805), as highway=footway is only used outdoors in practice, and I somehow doubt this is even an accurate trace of an indoor footway. If you're adding footways in an attempt to increase spawn in PoGo, go ahead and do that, but please stick with accurate mapping that follows OSM community practices and improves our shared map. Thanks! David
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 05:08:52+00:00): WallofKron, you traced a new park, but from aerial imagery this does not look like a park -- there are many residences within it, and the outline crosses a road slightly. Please make this park outline more accurate if it's real, or explain why it should be left-as is rather than removed. Thanks, David
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 05:12:53+00:00): WallOfKron, I have deleted this natural=water because aerial imagery makes it clear that these are several small residential backyards, not a body of water. Please stop adding fictional objects to OSM -- our goal is to accurately represent the physical world. Many things you added helped improve the map, but this one does not. -David
AngocA (2024-04-02 22:29:28+00:00): Hola. Cuál es la fuente de datos para estos nombres de vías? ya que se ven iguales, incluyendo los errores, a los que están en Google Maps.
literan (2016-12-25 13:18:06+00:00): линия с одним area=yes это все равно что линия без тегов - бессмыслица. Откатываю.
Артем Болдаев (2016-12-25 13:20:10+00:00): Так это первый раз.
Alan Melly (2017-01-27 08:39:00+00:00): Fake
mavl (2016-12-25 13:22:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44661754 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
whb (2017-01-28 10:04:55+00:00): Hallo!
Was ist das denn genau für eine Hütte?
Ich frage, da diese zwischenzeitlich von einem anderen Mapper als Unterstand (Wetterschutz) eingetragen war:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567654455/history
Oder ist das nur eine private Hütte, welche nicht offen ist?
kukib (2017-01-29 15:41:22+00:00): Hallo whb,

die Hütte ist, wie in Änderungssatz kommentiert, gemauert. Sie gehört der Stadt Kirchheimbolanden und ist für die Öffentlichkeit geschlossen. Sie hat allerdings ein Vordach (Holzkonstruktion), das für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich ist, und sich durchaus bei Bedarf als Unterstand eignet. Deshalb wäre amenity=shelter auch ok. Die Änderung von Prince Kassad am 22.12. habe ich gar nicht mitbekommen - sorry. Ich weiß erst seit heute einigermaßen, wie ich mir die Historie eines Objektes genauer ansehen kann.
Ich ändere wieder auf 'shelter'. 
Danke für die Rücksprache!
lyx (2016-12-26 04:24:06+00:00): Hi, I noticed that you changed highway 302 from tertiary to primary and secondary. Are you sure this should be mapped as the most important road class after Interstate? I'm not so sure about that. I also have some doubts on using "MT S-302" as a ref on the way. Highway shields use only the number and the fact it's a secondary state highway is shown by using an arrowpoint shield instead of the square shields used for (primary) state highways. You can see a sample shield on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:network%3DUS:MT:secondary
Howpper (2016-12-26 09:21:25+00:00): The reason I did this, was because it is one of the only numbered highways in the area. Since this one is paved, do you think it should be secondary? And also, what do you think I should put for the ref?
lyx (2016-12-26 18:21:57+00:00): I'm not sure about the urban part of the route, secondary might be justified here. The rural part is just fine as tertiary IMHO, everything else in that area would be unclassified or track anyway.
Regarding the ref, I always use MT XXX on the ways. All three digit numbers except MT 100 and MT 200 are secondary state highways, so this should be sufficient. As soon as we get a renderer using shields, it will be drawn based on the network tag in the route relation, so then the ref tag on the ways will become less important. Unfortunately it looks like it could still be quite some time until we are there.
Before I forget: Thanks for working on Montana highways! If you like, please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Montana/Highways for the current state of things.
mavl (2016-12-25 13:22:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44661754 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
jptolosa (2017-04-11 20:44:05+00:00): De acuerdo a la información que manejo el Nevado Chachacomani se encuentra cerca del Condoriri y que era correcto el nombre que puse de ex glaciar Chacaltaya.
5m4u9 (2017-04-11 21:38:46+00:00): pues si. ahora recuerdo que estuve revisando el camino al pico, y luego en un artículo hablada del chachacomani y lo busqué por ahí  en modo automático lo edité sin verificar.

lo mejor revertir el cambio.

en el cuadrante EB+9-0 dice como vos lo pusiste → http://www.igmbolivia.gob.bo/downloads/cartografia/h250psad56/pdf/se-19-03.pdf
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 01:51:57+00:00): Hi bigb0b, I'm afraid your entire series of edits on OSM are more harmful than helpful, so I'm going to ask the OSM Data Working Group to revert all your edits. Please learn more about OSM before making more changes -- when you make harmful changes, it affects this map shared worldwide. Thanks, David
mavl (2016-12-25 13:22:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44661754 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
BCNorwich (2016-12-25 06:51:48+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I can find no evidence of this park and stream or moat. With three houses being demolished there should have been a planning request at least. I have therefore removed your additions. 
Perhaps the park is in a different place? Your mapping was actually pretty good, if I can help properly placing the park please just ask.
Regards
Glassman (2016-12-26 06:53:13+00:00): I suspect this was an attempt to influence pokemon go. Good to see it removed.
infinitezero (2016-12-26 15:05:11+00:00): I will leave you the same response I gave ToeBee. I have made these changed because the Wellston Trail in "Fountain park" no longer "Dry Lake park", which I have verified this with the city, is paved with concrete not asphalt. Which I go running on it all the time, you can even check google maps to verify what I'm saying is correct. I'm in no way abusing OSM I'm updating the information so OSM can be as accurate as possible. In response to the service road at the the Museum of Aviation it is very rarely used as a service road, they have Traffic cones on it that no longer allows vehicles to drive on them. This is used as a foot path for tourist to walk on to view the planes placed along the path. The Museum of Aviation isn't a part of Robins Air Force base, it borders it. A Person doesn't need military ID to gain access to the Museum of Aviation. My changes were justified and 100% correct in no way vandalism.
Stonehill News (2021-02-06 19:43:14+00:00): Where did the name Wella's come from?
lemacik (2016-12-25 13:02:33+00:00): Miło, że robisz porządki, ale przy okazji: powinno być albo "św.", albo "Świętego", nie "świętego":
http://sjp.pwn.pl/zasady/;629401
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-12-25 13:06:54+00:00): Nie wszystko na raz, bo się gdzieś pomylę ;-)
lemacik (2016-12-25 13:08:46+00:00): Jasne :)
maraf24 (2016-12-26 09:24:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240895431
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210041784
Commodoortje (2016-12-28 11:48:34+00:00): De weg heeft hier geen verbinding met elkaar.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/831614