piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TrekClimbing (2022-09-02 12:43:24+00:00): Thanks for the idea. I didn't use description because that's not really what it is, but I see :reason is in use for some keys https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=reason#keys so have used sac_scale:reason https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125697392
anotherToad (2022-08-15 23:55:32+00:00): In case anyone is wondering where it is, it's here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124948547#map=18/44.22339/-79.32728 where there is a bit of border that sticks out.
eggie (2022-08-16 05:16:06+00:00): Dag Yormac..
Zeker weten dat dit nr 19 is en dat de naam van de winkel 'Hilversum' is?
Gebruik indien mogelijk de reeds aanwezige adresnode
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-08-16 07:17:46+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met adresnode Kruissteeg 9.
De naam heb ik aangepast van name=Hilversum naar name=Yormac Apple Service en Support
Op de Eemnesserweg heb ik het bedrijf verwijderd conform de info van de website.
Klopt nu de info? 

MVG
eggie
LockOnGuy (2022-08-16 02:39:24+00:00): Why did you change the name to have only the Kurdish language while the Kurds are a minority in the city? this is not your first, as you did it to other cities like Al Hasakah https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/572568688/history        
Please stop changing names to Kurdish in cities when the Kurds are minorities.       
Also stop removing name:ar from villages and neighborhoods and other POI, read the comments I've left you previously and stop the vandalism.            
I will revert this edit and restore the 'name' tag to be bilingual in both Arabic and Kurdish again even though this is an Arab-majority city under Arab control.
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:25:53+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 14:27:49+00:00): reverted
sputinyk (2022-08-16 19:35:52+00:00): edição revertida, você usou uma camada de fotos antiga, use uma camada de satélite mais recente como a Maxar no menu a direita.
nylbert victor fernandes morais (2022-08-16 19:54:44+00:00): as ruas alteradas foram de acordo com o formato do local real, as ruas são lotes com quarteirões de tamanhos iguais. O mapeamento atual está totalmente deformado.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-17 14:56:42+00:00): nada disso, voce usou a camada bing, que é mais antiga que a camada maxar. mude a camada e verá a diferença ;)
Colin Smale (2022-08-16 07:13:58+00:00): You tagged a Welsh Community boundary with a wikidata link to a parish (which is only an ecclesiastical concept in Wales these days). IMHO this is not correct, but I would love to hear why you think it is.
spelledwrongdotuk (2022-08-17 19:57:11+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125033521
Colin Smale (2022-08-17 20:21:27+00:00): Thank you!
pantufla (2024-10-01 08:06:55+00:00): Hola buenas, esto qué es? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083297546/history
guaiquerí (2024-10-01 12:52:01+00:00): Hola. Punto de Atención al Ciudadano de la GNB. Es una instalación de la Guardia Nacional.
pantufla (2024-10-03 07:17:30+00:00): Gracias pro la rápida respuesta. Lo arreglé un poco para que quede no como zona militar. Quizás podríamos definirlo en conjunto. Un saludo, espero estés bien, pana.
JJIglesias (2022-08-16 17:23:07+00:00): Saludos.

Al crear edificaciones se requiere q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.

Por favor visita https://learnosm.org y https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

Gracias
JJ
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-03 05:53:55+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126917119
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-03 05:54:40+00:00): Hi.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:18:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
rhtb0 (2022-08-16 08:34:37+00:00): 안녕하세요
이름에 HL/GN-326 SOTA라는 이름을 추가히시는 이유가 뭔가요?
무슨 뜻이 존재해서 추가하시는 건가요?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:08:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:26:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
azakh-world (2022-08-16 07:16:12+00:00): Hello.
I can't figure out why there are two stations and two platforms at Long Term Parking. Could you please review these objects and the stop_area relation(s)?

Best regards,
Alexey
stevea (2022-08-16 07:26:36+00:00): It's better, but t likely still not perfect
azakh-world (2022-08-16 07:35:35+00:00): I'd fix it myself if I knew what to do. PT preprocessor can't build routing data without stop_positions being connected to a station via stop_area relation. https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/usa.html
Please fix it or explain the intention of the changes.
stevea (2022-08-16 07:41:02+00:00): Well, don't use "PT preprocessor."  It isn't OSM, it's a tool that parses the syntax of PT tags.  The intention of the changes was/is to include Long Term Parking, which was built infrastructure, but excluded from the route relation.  (It only went as far as the Rental Car Center, but the route has included all the way to Long Term Parking for months, even over a year, I think).

If there you believe there are stop_area relation errors, fix them, you have my nod to do so.
stevea (2022-08-16 21:56:11+00:00): I have improved this (blue route).  I'll let it settle, as I'm now looking at red having only one route in the route_master is a warning that can be ignored.
azakh-world (2022-08-18 10:04:00+00:00): More nicer now, thanks. Though, I'm strongly convinced that a roundtrip route should contain a continuous cyclically closed rail sequence. Alas, I only could find a blurry mention of it here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Order_matters
Now the Blue Line rail members form a circle and a pair of torn segments, and the circle doesn't contain any stop_position at Long Term Parking.
I think one shouldn't involve all rails on both sides of the platform by all means, or should create two route variants under the same route_master (what is redundant IMO).
Don't you mind to construct a complete continuous closed rail sequence for the Blue Line?
stevea (2022-08-18 19:31:06+00:00): Have at it, friend.  Building perfect PTv2 routes is both a goal and a process.  While I strive for the former, I happily accept the latter, especially as it is "good and forward" (or as you say "more nicer now").

Go ahead:  continue to nudge this forward.  Going from 98% to 99% is something I'll take (as I give it).  Going to 100% would thrill me.  We all nudge our data ahead as we can and do, with "perfect" as the goal, even if going to 99% isn't 100%.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:21:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:33:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Andrea Musuruane (2022-08-25 13:40:04+00:00): Can you please tell me the source for editing bus stops in Robella and adding operator=TPL FVG? Do you know that TPL FVG is?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:57:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Dodko (2022-08-17 08:58:38+00:00): budovy zarovnajte do pravého uhlu klávesou Q
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086584051
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086584059

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79937125
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71668297
name=prístrešok
name=schátraný objekt
cudzincovi nič nepovie

pozrite si dokumentáciu
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=shelter

building=ruins
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:building
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:31:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Warin61 (2022-08-17 01:30:06+00:00): Hi

There are now gaps in the relations for train routes ... 
Relation: Brisbane XPT (8406942)
Relation: North West Xplorer 223 (12418296)

Perhaps you could keep an eye on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.58109&lat=-33.22853&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes ?

------------
The link for the TfNSW TOC Manual is still pending a file upload... see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#New_South_Wales
jMapsAu (2022-08-17 14:31:59+00:00): Hi @Warin61

- That's a great little tool. I shall get those Routes fixed up. Really wish iD would stop breaking stuff along the way (I did not intentionally delete these relations).

- Yes I'm awaiting permission to upload files on the wiki. Aiming to get that resolved ASAP.
Warin61 (2022-08-18 07:36:41+00:00): I keep using that tool to spot my errors .. 4 of them yesterday ... mutter mutter...
jMapsAu (2022-09-09 02:36:28+00:00): Hi @Warin61
- Done a passover of the tracks to re-add relations to the ways. Will give it a week and check the tool again to see if there's still errors (though it's still erroring on a few of the fixed ways).
- Still waiting on Wiki permissions to upload the authorisation.

iD's route relation management is a pain. Found I would have to open the routes from other ways, close it, delete from the way that had it already, readd it to the original way, then it would show up in the way that needed correcting. At least it held once I got it to recognise it.
Warin61 (2022-09-09 07:01:21+00:00): You could always try JOSM ... 

I have been thinking (always a bad sign!) that it would be easier if these routs share the same path that the 'same path' could be a single relation tht the other relations then use. The difficulty is the where they use differing platforms... much simpler where they only have one choice. But that would be a future thing .. busy with other stuf.
jMapsAu (2022-09-09 07:24:13+00:00): Would certainly be much easier to manage. One route master on the track, multiple routes just using the route master for reference
Warin61 (2022-09-09 07:38:59+00:00): Think OSM uses the word 'master' for the combined overall route, the smaller bits would not be called 'master' IIRC. But it is going to be a big job. Probably worthwhile.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:07:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Nathan_A_RF (2022-08-17 11:22:55+00:00): You have ruined the road. Please undo
SomeoneElse (2022-08-27 10:08:06+00:00): Hello rileyfreeman,
What I think the previous comment means is that you've merged lots of different sections of road into one, and they actually had different tags before - compare for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889222870/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889222867/history before you deleted them.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124953626 shows that in this changeset you'd made the whole road one big bridge, which it obviously isn't.
Best Regards,
Andy
aTarom (2022-09-10 11:14:29+00:00): Hi, felixi
There are a few
"entrance"="nm"
like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9956192362/history
can you fix it please?
Cheers
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-08-16 10:52:25+00:00): Hallo ashvuafb-11,

ich hatte Dich gestern bereits darum gebeten sinnvolle und zutreffende Kommentare zu schreiben. Hier schreibst Du nur "zaun". Von 18 bearbeiteten Linien ist nur ein Zaun dabei.

Bitte lese Dir folgendes durch und beachte bitte, was dort steht:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
SekeRob (2022-08-18 12:15:20+00:00): Hi

If you succeeded in deleting a duplicate line (node deletes suggest so), it was a triple. Underneath the service road was another track hidden. (YCMTU)

I've dropped a note to the mapper as he named a way across the corner "Strada comunlae di servizio" which could just be a descriptive name, a real name it isn't. That way is also duplicate edge, but not clear which has to go, the service way or the unclassified. Both were mapped in the same timespan.

ciao
gscholz (2022-08-19 08:44:33+00:00): Ciao Robert,
you are free to fix any error I make ;-)
Guido
daft35 (2022-08-16 09:12:44+00:00): А гэта не супярэчыць правілам?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Belarus:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%8B_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
LidaCity (2022-08-16 09:29:14+00:00): хм.
но забавно - среди 7958 местных автодорог - было 6 латинских H и 7952 кириллических Н
Ткнул наугад в республиканские М6 и Р28 - М и Р кириллические.

Видимо wiki устарело, и где то есть обсуждение.
Но посмотрев историю правок этой статьи, вижу что некто @Kos32 исправил статью (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:Belarus:Общие_принципы_обозначения_дорог&oldid=521945)
daft35 (2022-08-16 11:37:20+00:00): Вы правы, вики некорректна, надо будет подправить
LidaCity (2022-08-16 11:41:18+00:00): и помню где-то было обсуждение, что рефы - только кирилические (но не нашёл, возможно это в гугл-группах было и очень давно)

И насчёт местных автодорог - ещё найти и разметить осталось больше 10 тыс
LidaCity (2022-08-16 11:56:52+00:00): вспомніл, почему однозначно кірілліческіе рефы, в последнее время ввелі новую нумерацію, і появілось много рефов віда "М6 / П2"
daft35 (2022-08-16 12:16:43+00:00): По поводу П2 не очень понял, можно пример?
LidaCity (2022-08-16 12:27:09+00:00): https://pravo.by/document/?guid=12551&p0=W22136507&p1=1
daft35 (2022-08-16 12:52:32+00:00): Спасибо!
И это сейчас вносится в OSM?
LidaCity (2022-08-16 12:56:22+00:00): да
Patr1k_P (2022-08-18 16:58:20+00:00): zdravim, ak je to predpriprava a bufet tam este nie je tak by po spravnosti nemal byt ani v mape...objekty sa pridavaju az ked realne existuju..a ten nazov bufetu nie je vymysleny?
RomanKucera (2022-08-18 17:02:04+00:00): názov nie je vymyslený, bude čoskoro, ale ak odporuje pravidlám tak vymažem
Patr1k_P (2022-08-18 17:08:10+00:00): pravidlam asi odporuje iba to, ze je to zakreslene v mape ale realne to tam este nie je...ak sa to tak bude aj volat, tak je to v poriadku, ale treba to pridat az to bude v prevadzke
Dodko (2022-08-19 09:00:35+00:00): dá sa značiť aj ako
proposed:amenity=fast_food
a po postavení predponu vymazať

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:P%C5%99edpona_%C5%BEivotn%C3%ADho_cyklu
silversurfer83 (2022-08-18 20:35:07+00:00): Hi
Ich möchte Dich gerne auf diese Seite und ihren Inhalt hinweisen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Wäre für andere Nutzer sehr hilfreich, wenn Du sie dir vielleicht etwas zu herzen nimmst.

Abgesehen davon danke fürs Eintragen dieser tatsächlich sehr hilfreichen Einrichtung :) (meine ich ernst)

Ein Hinweis zu mobilen Apps wie Go Map!! Diese stellen sehr häufig bei allen Änderungen auch das Feld "name" bereit. Dieses bitte nur ausfüllen, wenn der POI auch wirklich einen richtigen Namen hat, so wie hier beschrieben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen

Grüße
silversurfer83
oba510 (2022-08-16 09:03:25+00:00): Hi.  What is maxspeed_explicit? And why did you delete the maxspeed keys?
user_5359 (2022-08-18 11:19:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Langlaeufer (2022-08-16 08:31:41+00:00): Ich bin da jetzt auch nochmal drüber und habe noch cycleway=track nachgetragen und teilweise auf lane=exclusive geändert. Kannst du mal schauen, ob du das auch so mittragen kannst? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124959802
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124955023
Nadjita (2022-08-16 11:22:59+00:00): Hat ein wenig gedauert, aber ja. Sieht  eigentlich gut aus. AUf lange Sicht wäre es allerdings besser, die Fuß- und Radwege als separate highways zu erfassen, weil man ja gar nicht sieht, ob Fuß- und Radverkehr segregated ist, oder nicht. Das würde auch die ganzen Kreuzungen einfacher machen, denn ich beweifle, dass ein Router sinnvoll damit arbeiten kann.
Spricht aus Deiner sicht etwas dagegen, das längerfristig zu trennen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124955023
user_5359 (2022-08-18 19:06:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/799370207. What is the meaning of the tag HHHH = GGGG?
mueschel (2022-08-17 08:10:31+00:00): Hi,
could you check these nodes? They got a couple of foreign tags:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9956262191
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9955253893
iWowik (2022-08-17 06:16:31+00:00): День добрый!
Вы добавляете адресную информацию, но делаете это порой не по правилам.
Микрорайон это не addr:street, и в адресе он к тому же дожен быть записан ровно в том же виде, что и вname самого микрорайона, без сокращений и ровно с тем же порядком слов.
Не вынуждайте других участников вашу работу за вами переделывать или откатывать.
Kovirii (2026-05-07 00:44:54+00:00): This is not a one way, as per street view and road markings visible on satellite imagery.