piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
M!dgard (2021-02-07 12:40:32+00:00): Kun je het apartementencomplex Seagarden (Koninginlaan 61-75 en Stationsstraat 62-72) terugzetten naar de vorige versie a.u.b.? Die is namelijk gesurveyd ter plaatse terwijl het GRB enkel luchtbeelden gebruikte.
eggie (2021-02-11 08:25:11+00:00): Dag Curt  Wel de opmerking gelezen van de voorgaande mapper?
note 	Outer van multipolygoon, niet verwijderen
curt1us (2021-02-11 08:44:13+00:00): Ja - die had ik inderdaad gezien. Maar ik heb het object als zodanig ook niet verwijderd  - alleen het naamveld. Heb ik dit verkeerd geinterpreteerd?
eggie (2021-02-11 08:46:37+00:00): Geen idee... Ik was aan het zoeken wat er verwijderd was , maar heb het niet gevonden. De rendering lijkt in orde.
MVG
eggie
curt1us (2021-02-11 08:47:33+00:00): Ozo! De naam was een enkel streepje "-".
eggie (2021-02-11 08:48:27+00:00): Ahh.. Oke.....  duidelijk!
Mapse verder
eggie
user_5359 (2021-02-05 19:41:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
kapazao (2021-02-05 08:54:36+00:00): Hola, el edificio de la residencia no abarca este área.
Se debe crear como edificio a parte, los datos estaban correctos.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98729135
tux67 (2021-02-05 17:03:31+00:00): Hi jande75,

FYI - amenity=childcare ist kein akzeptiertes tag.
Ich würde kindergarten und isced_level vorschlagen.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98729193
tux67 (2021-02-08 11:02:27+00:00): Danke fürs update .. btw. sobald das Gelände auf dem Luftbild klar zu sehen ist, würde man das einzeinchen und das amenity=kindergarten und die dazugehörigen Attribute auf das Gelände umziehen.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98729193
ma-rt-in (2022-07-21 15:58:36+00:00): Hallo,

wie kommst du den auf access=permissive
foot=permissive
an den Fußwegen?
vg
OSM_Woman (2022-07-22 06:54:36+00:00): Hallo,
auf dem Gelände stehen weit überwiegend Gebäude einer Baugenossenschaft. Insofern sind m. E. die Wege dazwischen nicht öffentlich und somit wird der Zutritt gestattet von der Baugenossenschaft. Oder habe ich da ein falsches Verständnis von permissive?
ma-rt-in (2022-07-31 13:05:19+00:00): Also erstmal stellt sich die Frage, ob da überhaupt ein Tor oder Schilder stehen, welche besagen, das es Privatgrund ist. Den sonst darf jeder dort drüber. Das permissive würde ich nur dort setzen, wo durch Schilder eine Freigabe gegeben wird, aber deutlich wird das es Privatgrund ist.

vg
OSM_Woman (2022-07-31 14:19:17+00:00): OK, verstanden. Das ist hier nicht der Fall. Es gibt zwar Tore zur Bürgerweide, aber keine Schilder, die den Durchgang verwehren oder gestatten. Was wäre die richtige Klassifizierung? Willst Du das ändern  oder soll ich das machen?
ma-rt-in (2022-08-04 20:39:22+00:00): Also wenn du die Tore erfassen würdest, wäre das super. Diese kannst du dann nämlich mit access=private kennzeichen. Die Wege sonst würde ich alle access/-subkeys entfernen.

vg
OSM_Woman (2022-10-08 14:01:11+00:00): Bitte entschuldige meine späte Antwort. Als Du mir geschrieben hattest, war ich im Urlaub und danach habe ich die Nachricht übersehen. Ich bekomme es leider nicht hin, die Tore einzutragen. Die sind nämlich teilweise überbaut, also über dem Tor sind mehrere Stockwerke das Hauses. Es übersteigt einfach meine Fähigkeiten in OSM das einzutragen.
Max-Kritic (2021-02-05 08:20:41+00:00): Attention. Il ne faut pas rajouter network et opérator sur un public_transport = platform. C'est inutile et une erreur dans http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr J'ai changé plusieurs lignes en public_transport:version= 2 où ce type de renseignement est indiqué. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:public_transport
Lucila Ramos (2021-06-29 20:55:44+00:00): https://www.fravega.com/
SomeoneElse (2021-02-06 22:28:44+00:00): Hello michael60634,
You suggested that http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=1152720 be "upgraded to a country".  https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf explains how OpenStreetMap decides how various places get the admin_level tags that they do.  If you think that that the way that OSM currently represents Abkhazia is wrong, I'd suggest writing to the main OSM international mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk about it and explaining why you think it is wrong.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
PS: I'll remove the fixme here, but hopefully have provided enough information so the person adding it can progress the issue.
Amegaz (2021-02-06 00:04:29+00:00): Hi egri,
You have six edits over a large area. Please make your updates more located. The hole update area is even greater.
Best regards 
Amegaz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98731404
egri (2021-02-06 20:19:06+00:00): Hi Amegaz,
thanks for the hint. Unfortunately my mismanagement using streetcomplete.

Gruß egri
maraf24 (2021-02-09 10:30:36+00:00): A mi się wydawało, że stan faktyczny to stan widoczny w terenie, a nie w rejestrze :)
mweper (2021-02-05 13:31:05+00:00): Mati, por favor no conectes las lineas de interpolación con los edificios o áreas de PDI, ya que los datos en los nodos de esa interpolación acaban borrándose o corrompiéndose y luego quedan inservibles.
Las interpolaciones de altura deben quedar separadas (sin conexión) del resto de los datos.
Ya corregi los problemas que hubo en este cambio pero veo que en muchos otros haces lo mismo y pueden haber quedado inservibles.
user_5359 (2021-02-05 18:38:08+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
    done_date=true
    locked=false
    project_id=2071
    state=4
Please explain the meaning of these keys.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-02-05 21:25:32+00:00): helloo. thanks for your attention. it already fixed now. the tag add by accidentally, and has be done clean up by our team.

happy mapping
Polarbear (2024-08-19 20:01:24+00:00): Hallo momabebra,
warum ist der Sandkasten im öffentlichen Schwimmbad 'private' ?
Den kann doch jeder zahlende Badbesucher nutzen?

Way: 119293387
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Elyana IRM-ED (2022-12-01 07:49:24+00:00): Hi, t_ramya

You did great job. Due to connectivity issue on https://maproulette.org/challenge/30155/task/142668316 also based on Maxar and Bing Aerial Imagery, I have to delete the highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/903981507) because it overlaps with another highway.

Thank you, happy mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:54:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:29:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
MKnight (2021-02-28 16:33:30+00:00): Moin, ich bin über CS97390429 auf diverse Ungereimtheiten bei maxspeed gestossen und behebe diese gerade.
Nun bin ich darauf gestossen, dass Du im Bereich zusätzlich maxspeed von 120 auf none geändert hast mit Quelle mapillary. Die neuesten Fotos auf mapillary sind vom 11.Dez.2020 und dort ist überall deutlich ein 120 zu erkennen.

Sollte sich das mittlerweile geändert haben (?) kann ich meinen CS rückgängig machen ansonsten wüsste ich gern, warum Du das umgestellt hast?
MKnight (2021-02-28 16:36:14+00:00): Meine Änderung wäre: CS100145440
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:54:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:20:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:28:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:52:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-03 08:55:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8395636620/history has shop = tortilleria that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=tortilleria ? Should it be shop=tortilla proposed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:shop=tortilla ?

Is it amenity=fast_food or amenity=restaurant by any chance? Or are they selling pieces not ready to eat? Or ingredients? Maybe some https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine would be a good idea?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:34:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:28:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:44:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:44:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:53:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:30:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:52:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:45:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:22:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:51:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:50:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
ivanbranco (2021-02-07 09:46:26+00:00): Hi,

diet:nut_free would be better and is already in use. diet:nut=yes is used only here.
Did you meant there are nut on the dishes or that are not?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-02-07 09:49:00+00:00): This resturant only offer food made of nut, so I use this tag
——Laoshubaby
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-02-07 09:53:10+00:00): If you have some idea about how to describe this kind of restruant better and ues diet tag to warn those people sensitive to specific ingredent, please don't worry, just to Fix it, Thanks you!Best wishes!
ivanbranco (2021-02-07 10:00:27+00:00): I googled 糖炒栗子 and seems like it's what in english are called "roasted chestnut", can you confirm it?

If so, I'm gonna delete diet:nut:yes and add a cuisine=roasted_chestnut
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-02-07 10:03:38+00:00): Indeed, as you said, my label is not particularly correct and strict. Perhaps modifying according to your suggestions will more meet with the public's data maintenance method! Thanks again!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
impiaaa (2021-02-05 15:32:05+00:00): This looks like a house. Is it really the right address?
hintonsb (2021-02-08 14:35:33+00:00): Thanks for checking my work! I could totally be incorrect, but I used the "Address reference layer" described in the task's documentation, (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vnR8xpxZlOPvMibsPX0TqFy99k_BaFs5aiszIDedgPo/preview#heading=h.v6c63srvevqh).
It looks like the correct address to me.
impiaaa (2021-02-08 15:22:39+00:00): I know that the location of that address is correct. What I mean is, is there really a Togo's at that address? The person who filled out the form could have missed a digit in the house number, or put their home address by accident.
hintonsb (2021-02-09 17:22:22+00:00): I do not know. I only did a few of these tasks from this project since I noticed almost none of the info was remotely correct. I honestly do not care whether this change set is kept, not sure how to undo the maproulette task though.
JayTurnr (2021-02-05 03:33:53+00:00): Also cleaned up some landuse
Kroo Tota (2021-02-14 09:09:21+00:00): Добрый день. Для чего вы удалили съезд? В реальности он есть.
Jarek 🚲 (2021-02-05 03:47:20+00:00): see also discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2494458
compdude (2021-02-15 01:53:12+00:00): Have you verified in the aerial imagery that this entire area is actually forests, with no clearings or anything? I find that hard to believe that this *entire* area is all forest.
spiregrain (2021-02-09 09:46:17+00:00): Apologies, I had misspelled it in a JOSM 'Custom Present', and put it all over the area for a couple of weeks.
PantherStrix (2021-02-09 11:47:01+00:00): No problem, as long as you found and correct the mistake the database becomes even better. Greetings from Germany.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-18 01:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99482890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in te Philippines following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4752
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al