piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:09:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:27:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:54:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:39:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:43:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:27:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:53:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:54:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:08:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:41:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:10:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Superadlen (2017-04-27 14:34:50+00:00): merci kho la3ziz https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmdz/
nammala (2017-04-26 05:36:01+00:00): Hi kmama2009,

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is the real map of the world. the data we add in OSM should be ground truth and present on the ground. Please don't add fantasy data and vandalize the map. 

Regards,
nammala
SomeoneElse (2017-04-26 07:21:11+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Can you explain why you deleted the shops such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3715328045/history on this street?  Are they really no longer there any more?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-04-26 07:52:57+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue à OpenStreetMap!
Pouvez-vous expliquer pourquoi vous avez supprimé les magasins tels que http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3715328045/history commentaires sur cette rue? Sont-ils vraiment plus là plus?
Cordialement,
Andy
saikabhi (2017-04-26 06:04:20+00:00): Hello,

Following on from the comment in your other changeset, building=* tag should not be over an entire area. It should only cover individual building footprints as seen in the satellite imagery. The area can be tagged with landuse=* tags. I am going ahead and making the correrctions to this changeset. Please keep this in mind in your next edits.

Happy mapping!

Thanks,
Abhishek
nigelcharles (2017-04-26 06:09:38+00:00): Thanks for the information. I am new to editing maps and still learning.
saikabhi (2017-04-26 06:19:54+00:00): Thanks for the prompt responses and fixes. Welcome to OpenStreetMap and please keep contributing more edits.

Cheers,
Abhishek
nigelcharles (2017-04-26 06:24:35+00:00): Sorry to bother you. But would you happen to know if Niantic(Pokemon Go) happen to use OSM? I noticed many parks,etc in my area were not tagged, which is why I am trying to help out.
saikabhi (2017-04-26 07:40:23+00:00): 
If you have local knowledge of any parks and any other features in your area, please go ahead and map them. Please keep contributing.
nigelcharles (2017-04-26 07:44:08+00:00): I surely will. Hopefully I will not make too many mistakes. Thanks for your patience.
tonyf1 (2017-04-26 06:27:52+00:00): I see you have added tunnel=yes to one of the underground stormwater drains. The wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain says: "Use man_made=pipeline where water, or other materials are carried underground or on the surface in pipes."
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-26 06:10:49+00:00): Hi  turner150990,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added landuse_1, Landuse_2 tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469694992/history#map=18/55.97307/-4.05779 Can you delete them and keep the appropriate tag.

Regards,

Upendra.
turner150990 (2017-04-26 10:14:43+00:00): Are they incorrect edits? There is a football pitch in the Park and it is a recreational area. if so i can remove them.
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-26 11:58:20+00:00): Hi turner150990,

Thanks for replying back. The landuse_1, landuse_2 tags you added do not render on OpenStreetMap. 

I guess the doubt is between whether this area on the ground is a grass, recreation_ground, park or a pitch. I suggest looking at these wiki links 

1.Park - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark 

2. Grass - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass 

3. Recreation tag http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground

4. Pitch -
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please add whichever you feel is appropriate from your local knowledge and remove the other tags.

Thanks,

Upendra
turner150990 (2017-04-26 12:03:41+00:00): I'll have a look at the links you provided. the paths that intersect the park split it up into sections. In one section there is a playpark area, in another there is a football section with goals. Other parts are grass and used as recreational areas particularly during the summer months. What do i do in this scenario where the overall park fits all of the criteria i tagged?

Thank you for your response. :)
turner150990 (2017-04-26 12:05:11+00:00): There have also been signs added requesting that cyclists dismount when in the park hence my removal of the designated cycle tag.
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-26 12:16:54+00:00): As you mentioned that the park is split in different sections. It would be great if you map each section and give appropriate tags  to them. Instead of giving land_use tags to the whole park, It's good to give respective tag to each section. Thank you for quick response.

Regards,

Upendra.
Владимир К (2017-09-08 09:13:29+00:00): не надо так делать, пожалуйста. названий на всё не надо описательных. и объекты неверные.
nammala (2017-04-26 05:18:04+00:00): Hi Fred_Pomponio,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The tagging you have given `area=yes` is not a valid tag. For the buildings you need to give `building=yes` and also make sure the roads are connected and map objects which are on the ground.

Regards,
nammala
saikabhi (2017-04-26 05:43:55+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have drawn a large building over an entire area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489466790and . The building should be ideally drawn only over the building outline you see in the satellite imagery. Can you please go ahead and fix it?
Thanks, 
Abhishek
saikabhi (2017-04-26 05:45:19+00:00): Correct link to the feature: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489466790
nigelcharles (2017-04-26 06:03:14+00:00): Done
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-26 05:36:49+00:00): Hi  jerryhappy,

There are untagged polygons in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489473588/history . Can you provide tags to them?

Regards,

Upendra.
BCNorwich (2017-04-26 05:37:16+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reverted (changed back to original state), your changeset, which added advertising and other fiction to an existing highway linked to several routes. 
You are welcomed to add your business to our live (best in the world) worldwide database but please take the time to do it properly. Your original alteration did no good for anyone in fact would have shown your company in bad light. 
There are many places to learn best practices and how to add data to OSM and if you need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2017-04-26 05:43:29+00:00): Hi, I now see your company is in the USA. You made alterations to Ramsey Road in Dovercourt England. How could you get it so wrong?
leFlips (2017-04-26 02:56:36+00:00): Messed up with an old comment. Did work on the White Pass (including Faser and Skagway)
Warin61 (2017-05-02 02:41:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
You moved node 3985397985 by over 100 meters, this has removed a section of the LCR National park. 

I have moved it back and disconnected it from the 'wood'. 

Will need some time to check your removal of node 3993045108.
Владимир К (2021-12-19 16:38:03+00:00): Добрый день!
Что вы хотели обозначить этим?
chnav (2017-04-26 08:42:26+00:00): Здравствуйте, поясните пожалуйста что вы рисуете. В проект ОСМ не вносятся фиктивные объекты и лабораторные объекты. Пожалуйста ответьте кто даёт вам такие задания. Спасибо.  

PS: все несуществующие объекты будут удалены
AndriesWijma (2017-04-26 11:30:08+00:00): Een brug hoort ook de tag layer=1 mee te krijgen en iets voorbij de watergrens op het 'land'  aan te sluiten: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge

Wegen en paden kun je beter niet laten samenvallen met de grens van een landuse zoals gras. Zorg dan dat het gras een stuk doorloopt over het pad of dat het gras ophoudt net voor de rand van het pad.

Graag ontvang ik een reactie van je n.a.v. mijn aanwijzingen op je wijzigingensets en mijn persoonlijke bericht via OSM.
saikabhi (2017-04-26 05:27:13+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have drawn a large building over an entire area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489485834. The building should be ideally drawn only over the building outline you see in the satellite imagery. Can you please go ahead and fix it?

Thanks,
Abhishek
Carnildo (2017-04-26 08:58:40+00:00): I noticed that you've mapped a number of things as "parking space".  That's meant for mapping individual spaces in a parking lot; the tag for a parking lot is "car parking".
mavl (2018-12-25 21:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:17:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:15:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:53:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Alan Trick (2017-06-06 06:33:00+00:00): Hi, did you survey the whole centenial trail? Should I update the fixme and source tags?

I was previously unable to find the trailhead on quadling road, is the access fairly straightforward?
brilang (2017-06-06 14:58:31+00:00): We hiked in from Chadsey Lake along the north slopes of Sumas Mountain while geocaching. We reached a point on the east side of the mountain where the trail turns to go south towards Quadling Road. There is no longer a public access from that location as the trail was obliterated by a quarry. It might be possible to access the trail via a steep scramble across **private property** but there is no longer a trail.
Alan Trick (2017-06-06 15:48:31+00:00): That what I suspected. Do you know where the trail ends?
brilang (2017-06-06 19:19:13+00:00): Unfortunately, no.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:30:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
JeSe-MX (2017-04-27 02:33:57+00:00): de preferencia, agregar un comentario al conjunto de cambios, pues con el comentario se especifica qué fue lo que se editó. No olvide agregar la fuente de sus datos.
smlr (2017-05-02 02:05:27+00:00): ok con los comentarios, sigo actualizando el mapa de Santa Maria la Ribera y alrededores, gracias
mavl (2017-04-26 16:53:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Полосы торможения и разгона неправильно обозначать как trunk_link (trunk_link - это элемент развязок). Специальных тегов для полос нет (насколько мне известно, но я могу ошибаться). Обычно явно указывают число полос проезжей части (lanes=?) и ограничение maxspeed:lanes.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Lanes
pesec (2017-04-27 04:35:29+00:00): В данном случае имеют место не полосы разгон-торможение, а отдельная полоса, отделенная металлическим ограждением с установленными знаками ограничения скорости на ней.
mavl (2017-04-27 04:54:35+00:00): Даже если это так, то всё равно эта дополнительная полоса относится к той же самой дороге. А дорога в целом (или её проезжая часть) обозначается только одной линией с тегом highway. Число полос обозначают тегом lanes, а не отдельными линиями. Для ограничений по полосам есть xx:lanes.  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway  
  
Например, в той же Тюмени улица Республики местами имеет по 7 полос, но сама улица обозначена всего одной линией с тегом highway=primary.  
  
Заграждение на отдельной полосе есть, например, на улице Пермякова перед пересечением с улицей Широтной при движении на север. Она никак специально не обозначена дополнительной линией. Просто является частью дороги.
pesec (2017-04-27 05:17:23+00:00): Всё же на мой взгляд визуально это будет правильнее и навигатор при построении маршрута будет видеть именно эту полосу, а не основную трассу и соответствующую скорость показывать.
Я впервые столкнулся с подобной организацией движения.
pesec (2017-04-27 05:18:14+00:00): Все прилегающие дороги поворачивают на эту полосу, а с трассы на них уже не повернуть, только заранее выехав на эту полосу.
mavl (2017-04-27 05:30:49+00:00): Ну, что ж. Не удивляйтесь, если вашу полосу кто-нибудь удалит или как-то иначе переделает этот участок дороги.
pesec (2017-04-27 05:34:33+00:00): Тогда посмотрим, как он отразит все нюансы ситуации. И переймём опыт.
pesec (2017-05-02 06:55:52+00:00): С удивлением отметил для себя спустя неделю, что и 2ГИС, и Яндекс-карты пошли этим же путем, выделив участок в отдельный проезд вдоль дороги.  )
d1g (2017-05-03 15:41:19+00:00): по идее это подъезд (hw=service), но в данном случае можно на один класс поднять т.к. в него включаются unclassified/residential

В Питере есть дороги-дубли, но они очень специфические и явно спроектированные как часть города. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Frontage_road
cadsauxk (2017-04-26 10:58:32+00:00): Oi Colega

obrigado pelas suas contribuições.

Mas inflezimente, você está convertendo estradas rurais para trilha agrícola (track). Trilha agrícola é somente aquela trilhas em pastos ou canviais. Não este tipo de estrada que você está alterando. Por favor informe-se primeiro sobre as regras de mapeamento do OSM.

obrigado
cadsauxk (2017-04-26 11:08:57+00:00): Ah perdão, quem converteu para track foi outro usuário. Em todo caso a classificação deve ser tertiary ou unclassified.

obrigado e desculpe a bronca
manings (2017-04-26 11:05:32+00:00): Hi Bhojaraj, thank you contributing to OSM! I noticed some of your buiding traces have duplicated nodes/ways.  Can you fix them.  Since you use JOSM, please use the Validator plugin.
Bhojaraj (2017-04-26 11:53:55+00:00): Thanks for the suggestion to use Validator plugin. It was the internet connection issue and I will fix the issue now. sorry for the mistake.
manings (2017-04-26 13:07:47+00:00): Thanks for fixing.  I fixed a few more here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48162693

Changes I made were the following:

- overlapping buildings
- buildings overlap with roads
- misaligned roads
بانک کتاب (2017-04-26 06:33:16+00:00): بانک کتب
Hjart (2017-04-26 06:51:13+00:00): Jeg har rettet Sorte Dam, idet du fik lavet en ekstra unødig multipolygon
freeExec (2017-04-26 10:12:41+00:00): Там прямо велодорожка, а не совмещённая и ходить по ней нельзя?
altoing (2017-04-26 10:13:44+00:00): Поставили знак велодорожка. Не совмещенная.
bubix (2017-04-26 09:57:44+00:00): Ti trovi bene StreetComplete?
steko (2017-04-28 20:27:17+00:00): Non sembra male! Certo è abbastanza limitato nel tipo di input ma è piuttosto rapido nell'utilizzo, ottima interfaccia. Tu lo hai provato?
bubix (2017-05-02 14:57:08+00:00): Purtroppo in mio vecchio Android mi da il seguente errore. "L'app non è compatibile con il tuo dispositivo" .-(
gileri (2017-04-26 20:36:43+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans quel cadre les bâtiments peuvent faire 0 étages ?
BAKfr (2017-04-26 21:13:51+00:00): Aucun que je connaisse.

C'est effectivement une erreur de compréhension du wiki de ma part, que j'ai fixé entre-temps.
gileri (2017-04-26 21:15:10+00:00): Oups, j'ai pas pensé à vérifier les version plus récentes... Parfait alors !
Superadlen (2017-04-27 15:01:13+00:00): merci kho la3ziz https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmdz/
Marych_ (2017-04-26 08:04:09+00:00): по какой улице адресуется этот дом?
Ракатбоши или Вохидова?
В будущем прошу вас указывать.
dgitto (2017-04-26 18:13:37+00:00): perché "typo fix"? non era mica un errore di battitura
deepskyblue86 (2017-04-26 21:22:55+00:00): Mi è spuntato già scritto, sicuramente era l'ultima cosa che avevo in cronologia e l'ho lasciato.
Semplice questione di noncuranza / fretta...
dgitto (2017-04-26 21:35:06+00:00): sì quindi il nome "Megaliti dell'Argimusco" è da scartare? lo mettiamo in alt_name almeno?
deepskyblue86 (2017-04-26 21:38:13+00:00): Nonostante non siano dei megaliti, molte persone chiamano le rocche di Argimusco in questo modo, quindi effettivamente ha senso.
Grazie
user_5359 (2017-04-26 19:13:19+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wenn innerhalb von einem Gebäude zwei (oder mehr) Einrichtungen vorhanden sind (hier Medienzentrale un eine OGS), dann erzeugt man entsprechende Punkte in dem Gebäude und fügt pro Punkt jeweils eine Beschreibung hinzu.
mavl (2019-01-19 16:46:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:55:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-01-19 16:46:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-19 16:46:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
msevilla00 (2022-01-11 13:00:35+00:00): Hola de nuevo,
En este objeto:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94903306
¿Qué es eso que has añadido al nombre "TE1001"? Si se trata de algún tipo de referencia has de añadirlo en la etiqueta "ref" y, por otro lado, no se si esta masa arbórea debe de tener, de nuevo una etiqueta "name". Si es una figura de protección ha de estar acompañada de su etiquetado correspondiente.
Saludos y gracias de nuevo por tus esdiciones.
Miguel
Константин Гам (2020-03-20 14:51:51+00:00): Убедительная просьба, не выдумывать названия остановок общественного транспорта.
dmarika (2017-04-26 08:45:12+00:00): added facilities in mataasnakahoy
mavl (2018-12-25 21:15:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dmarika (2017-04-26 08:40:15+00:00): Added Facilities in Mataasnakahoy
dmarika (2017-04-26 08:44:44+00:00): and in Batangas CIty
mavl (2018-12-25 20:12:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].