piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kovoschiz (2020-05-01 11:24:04+00:00): To be consistent, for the time being I feel like one should use `motorway_junction:ref=` to go with `highway=motorway_junction` when referring to exits. 
Shockingly, apparently `highway=motorway_junction` is also de facto only. You will some discussion on this topic.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-01 11:24:16+00:00): * You will some discussion on this topic in the talk page
feta2 (2020-05-05 18:22:08+00:00): Hello Kovoschiz,

Thanks for the quick and detailed response. It is interesting to learn about the numbering of junctions and crosswalks. I noticed on taginfo  (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/traffic_signals%3Aref#values) more of them that are tagged with `traffic_signal:ref=` in Hong Kong. Would you like me to go ahead and edit those four ways I mentioned earlier?

Thanks again,
feta2
Kovoschiz (2020-05-06 16:36:05+00:00): I made an HK-wide tidy. openstreetmap.org/changeset/84772139
praeteritum (2023-08-08 06:43:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139595639.
user_5359 (2019-12-17 15:43:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a shop http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
AKARNG GIS (2020-01-10 17:19:28+00:00): its an office
maraf24 (2019-12-16 19:49:49+00:00): Please stop using Bing for editing in Poland.
We have perfectly calibrated Geoportal Orthophotomap, available in JOSM. Use it!
For some regions, draw building using Building register, this one also available as wms layer in JOSM.
maraf24 (2019-12-16 19:50:37+00:00): The building added here intersects with road.  Is this right?
NaviMen (2019-12-16 19:55:53+00:00): On the Bing substrate, I’ll take a look at the account of the building registry, I can’t promise it, I use mapping as a relaxation and there’s no time to figure it out, but if there is time, I’ll take a look.  Thanks.
NaviMen (2019-12-16 19:57:17+00:00): Advise which substrate to use in order not to harm the Polish community?
maraf24 (2019-12-16 20:28:37+00:00): @NaviMen, your mapping is decent, but it could be better if you use better imagery. That's why I commented this changeset. You are not harming anybody with your edits:)
Use these imagery:
1. Geoportal 2: Orthophotomap (aerial image) WMTS
2. National Integration of Land Registers: Buildings

The number 2. often doesn't work or doesn't have any data for particular region. Then it's fine to trace buildings using number 1.
NaviMen (2019-12-16 20:32:34+00:00): I do not argue Bing is not high-quality, then what kind of mop should I use?  Are there aerial photos in JOSM?
maraf24 (2019-12-16 20:48:37+00:00): Yes, there are - If you map in Poland, JOSM automatically suggest you to use Geoportal 2 Orthophotomap in Imagery menu. Try it.
NaviMen (2019-12-16 21:16:24+00:00): Ok, I'll try how time will be!  Thanks for the advice!
Truchin (2019-12-17 20:46:16+00:00): Bonsoir. Pourquoi avoir mis le chemin en surfacique ? Ce n'est pas conforme aux conventions si le filaire n'est pas conservé et si la surface contient du highway.
Bonne continuation

Thomas
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-12-20 07:21:42+00:00): Czy nazwa tego ronda to jakaś nowość?
RicoElectrico (2019-12-20 11:27:12+00:00): Dr Danuta Owoc żyje, lub nie było informacji o jej śmierci, więc nie sądzę żeby nazwali tak rondo, plus byłyby o nazwaniu ronda jakieś informacje. Najpewniej fejk.
RicoElectrico (2019-12-20 11:30:34+00:00): Poproszę o źródło tej zmiany. Ja go nie znalazłem.
praeteritum (2023-08-08 06:07:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139594985.
tanonin (2023-05-15 20:25:30+00:00): Tu peux ajouter l'exploitant avec le tag: operator: c'est encore mieux que de mettre une note 😉
PT-53 (2019-12-17 08:32:20+00:00): Hallo thesurveyor,
Du hast an diesem Feldweg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756053755/history
etliche Access-Merkmale (wie z.B. foot=yes) ergänzt, die alle unnötig sind.
Welche Nutzungsrechte bzw. -beschränkungen bei welchem Highway-Typ als Standart gelten, kannst Du hier sehen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany
Bitte trage Access-Merkmale nur ein, wenn durch Verkehrszeichen eine von den Default-Access-Restriction abweichende Regelung gilt.
Löscht Du die unnötigen Access-Markmale wieder?
Bei Fragen kannst Du dazu im Änderungssatz einen neuen Kommentar erstellen.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-06 10:59:50+00:00): erledigt
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-07 15:01:11+00:00): deletes several large riverbanks, claiming to "fix" them. Meanwhile redrawn by other mapper. Needless deletion/redrawing of rivers.
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
aceman444 (2019-12-16 20:51:07+00:00): Zdravim, prosim piste zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien. Ak sa vsetky Vase zmeny volaju "jine", tak je to k nicomu. A o co ide v tejto sae zmien? Posunuli ste par nahodnych bodov o par metrov? K comu je to dobre?
GeorgeKaplan (2019-12-19 10:20:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Petite question sur le site de stockage: est-ce qu'il existe vraiment ? On peut l'utiliser ? S'il n'est qu'en projet (ce que je comprends de votre commentaire), il faut utiliser un préfixe indiquant que c'est un projet : proposer:landuse=landfill
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78490993
Pistouf (2020-01-03 14:06:45+00:00): Merci pour votre message.
Il semble que l'ISDND soit bien en fonctionnement puisqu'il est indiqué sous SINOE que depuis 2016, c'est l'entreprise Suez qui l'exploite : https://www.sinoe.org/fiche_service/index/id/5767
C'est juste que l'adresse n'est peut-être pas correcte.
Cordialement.
ralley (2019-12-16 22:58:46+00:00): Review as requested: Rather than "name=not in current use" please tag as dusused or abandoned as appropriate.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78491001
AlwynWellington (2019-12-17 00:52:32+00:00): @ralley, kia ora and thank you for that comment.

I was hoping for comment on how to tag a 'marae'

In that name pretty much unique to Aotearoa - New Zealand.

The closest, in some general respects is a 'village green' with buildings.  But village the concept of a village green is not known here and its use would be seen a foreign.

Whereas 'marae' is well defined in A-NZ.

What you saw earlier was a closed line.
I played with using a tag of 'amenity'.  But that seemed to lead down unwanted rabbit holes.

Then tagging 'building=wharenui'.

Since your comment I have found the 'disused' building is a wharekai (dining and kitchen space).

On my return home a short while I have deleted the closed line in favour of an area for the same space.

Hoping you can comment on what, for me, is how to tag the landuse of the area.

Or does OSM need an addition of 'marae'?  

There are several thousand of these throughout the country.

Kia kaha
ralley (2019-12-17 18:19:03+00:00): Not sure how best to tag a Marae, I've usually just seen the building tagged.  Maybe ask on the talk nz mailing list? (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz)
AlwynWellington (2019-12-17 22:30:07+00:00): Thanks.  Wasn't aware there was a talk-nz forum
eggie (2019-12-16 21:10:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. wat er niet dat is er niet. 

MVG,
Eggie
maraf24 (2019-12-16 21:06:17+00:00): Czy te  numery są na tablicach przy drodze?
maraf24 (2020-01-08 07:31:49+00:00): Wycofane.
mueschel (2019-12-21 10:22:24+00:00): Hi,
this hotel got a huge amount of 'payment' tags - including very strange ones that are very unlikely to be accepted by a hotel in Italy.
Did you check that all of them are correct or did you just select every option you found in the editor?
ortho_is_hot (2019-12-16 21:50:23+00:00): G'day ChristianMapper,

In regards to the classification of Kullabia Road—from the looks of it, I would say its better suited to be a minor/unclassified road rather than a residential road as if it's not a tertiary road (the downgrade you made) then it's probably a minor/unclassified road.

The Australian Tagging Guidelines tends to agree? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Urban_Areas

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
freeExec (2019-12-20 13:59:29+00:00): Да и addr:city можно было почикать.
mavl (2019-12-25 15:41:53+00:00): Здравствуйте, evgenykatyshev.  
На этот пакет правок пожаловались как на необсуждённое массовое редактирование.
Пожалуйста, в будущем перед массовыми правками ставьте участников в известность (например, на форуме в теме https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64443 ).  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
evgenykatyshev (2019-12-25 16:53:23+00:00): Жаловались только на процедуру, по существу жалоб не поступало?
mavl (2019-12-25 17:45:22+00:00): Да. Цитата "массовое несогласованное удаление тегов". Также была просьба об откате, но не вижу в этом смысла.
evgenykatyshev (2019-12-30 22:32:49+00:00): Зачем вы изменили класс съезда с моста на набережную?
Goatosm (2020-01-03 19:00:40+00:00): I adjusted the classes of other small segments in this area, and see why I should not have changed the ways leading to the embankment. Thanks for cleaning up the junction.
StephaneP (2019-12-23 15:29:05+00:00): Salut hu5933,

Super tous ces ajouts de commerces !
Quelques remarques :
- J'ai corrigé quelques doublons, comme le CIC qui était déjà indiqué sur l'emprise du batiment.
- Inutile d'ajouter le nom de la commune dans l'adresse, idem pour le code postal lorsqu'il est unique pour la commune.
- En général on ne met pas de majuscule dans les noms (je l'ai corrigé sur AGENCE DURET IMMOBILIER)
- Les opticiens mutualistes on bien changé de nom : https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/UDXgACVKiD0JdAXVQ5Fivw

Bonne continuation
Stéphane
Glassman (2019-12-17 06:32:04+00:00): Tip: instead of deleting the existing node, it can be merged with the building outlines. (Which looks great BTW) By merging instead of deleting, the history of the object is preserved.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78492105
ValleyGeek (2019-12-31 18:12:07+00:00): Thanks for the tip, I didn't see a way to do so but will look for the process next time I encounter that situation. If there is a way to revert my change and bring back the old node I'd happily recreate it as a merge.
crossdiver (2019-12-16 21:20:06+00:00): Thank you. Also, I can't seem to get that one island to render on all zoom levels?! Gah.
Carnildo (2019-12-17 05:33:46+00:00): The map isn't updated at all zoom levels at the same time.  The higher zoom levels usually sync up in an hour or two, a couple days at most, while the lower zoom levels can take longer (when I was mapping some farmland around Spokane, it took nearly three months for it to show up at the "all of Eastern Washington" zoom level).
freebeer (2019-12-19 13:28:18+00:00): islands can also be a special case, for multiple reasons.  there was an area i watched for days or weeks until i forgot about it, in hopes the invisible islands would appear.

some months later i was reminded to revisit that area to see that at last the islands were rendering, with no changes since before i forgot about them.  coastlines do not follow the normal update schedule is presumably the reason for that, given i'd ruled out the obvious syntax error that could trap the unwary.
Luzandro (2019-12-21 11:54:43+00:00): Hallo Laurenz,

ich habe den Fluss wieder vervollständigt, da dieser natürlich nicht unterbrochen ist, nur weil er unter einer Straße verläuft, aber ich habe die fehlenden Brücken ergänzt.
Alternativ wäre an anderen Stellen auch möglich, dass das Gewässer durch einen Tunnel/Rohr fließt, siehe bspw. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert

LG Andreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78492597
kapazao (2019-12-17 15:28:42+00:00): Hola, no me parece correcto lo que has hecho eliminando un elemento ya existente para crearlo de nuevo. Así se pierde todo el historial e información que ya había. Te agradecería que revirtieses ese elemento y que hicieras los cambios pertinentes en lo que ya había.
Por otra parte no entiendo bien lo de poner crossing:island=no si es necesario.
Un saludo
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78492709
user_9648818 (2020-02-04 12:52:25+00:00): Hola. Lo único que hice fue crear de nuevo el objeto para delimitar de manera más precisa el recinto del colegio y añadir más información de la que ya había. Un saludo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78492709
Xevi (2021-04-24 17:13:51+00:00): Be careful, fix warnings it's not removing inforamtion, in this case you deleted the amenity=fuel tag of a gas stattion https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/287004494/history
Tomas Straupis (2019-12-17 06:17:03+00:00): track kaip ir aukštesnės klasifikacijos kelias, jei ši atkarpa pasikeičia į service, tai vakariau po karjerus esantis track lieka prijungtas prie Kaimynų g., bet nebeprijungtas prie Švažo gatvės - susigadina hierarchija.
alga (2020-01-02 22:30:01+00:00): Hierarchija yra nesąmonė.  Realiam pasauly jos nėra.  Lyginti kas svarbiau, privažiavimas ar gruntinis kelias, tai panašiai kaip lyginti ananasus su tortais.  Tas kelias iki vartų ir per juos nėra neprižiūrimas miško kelias.  Tai sukvežimiams skirtas įvažiavimas į teritoriją su visa atitinkama inžinerija ir turbūt net asfalto danga po išbarstytu žvyru.
alga (2020-01-02 22:37:12+00:00): Sakyčiau, hierarchija yra rendererių sprendimas, kokius kelius nustoti vaizduoti kokiam zoome, o ne esminė duomenų savybė.  Taigi tos hierarchijos enforsinimas duomenyse yra žymėjimo rendereriui pavyzdys.  Kai duomenys neatitinka tikrovės tam, kad žemėlapis atrodytų gražiau kažkokiam zoome kažkokiam rendereryje.
Tomas Straupis (2020-01-03 08:36:25+00:00): Nenorėčiau sutikti, hierarchija yra esminis dalykas tiek GIS'e, tiek kartografijoje. Gyvenime irgi beveik visada hierarchija veikia, nes mašinos/dviračiai/žmonės važiuoja nuosekliai, o ne teleportuojasi :-)
ralley (2019-12-16 22:55:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit.  One thing - I don't think service=drive-through is correct as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddrive-through   Maybe just leave it at highway=service?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78493074
FarmFreshMaps (2019-12-16 21:54:23+00:00): Additional source: Yandex Panorama
mueschel (2019-12-21 09:17:40+00:00): Hi,
several of these areas have some foreign tags like 'ACRES' or 'UNIT_ID'. Did you add them on purpose or was this a mistake?

Jan
stevea (2019-12-21 19:25:40+00:00): CPAD data are under construction with the collaboration of other OSM volunteers in Santa Cruz, Santa Clara and San Mateo counties.  We're now on on our third version of these (2019b) and the UNIT_ID allows us to compare particular units.  You have mentioned to me that ACRES can be computationally computed; our Santa Cruz County wiki states "Sometimes tags from the shapefile in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS were left in the data when they do not logically map well to OSM tags. Where objectionable, these can be deleted."  I don't consider ACRES "a mistake," but you might.
Glassman (2019-12-17 06:34:07+00:00): The driveway you added looks more like a parking aisle to me. Can you check it and if you agree, make the change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78493271
ValleyGeek (2019-12-31 18:07:26+00:00): Thanks @Glassman, I've taken a look at the Wiki for details and pushed some new updates based on your comments and my new understanding of how they should be referenced.
mueschel (2020-01-04 11:02:52+00:00): Hi,
please check this way. You didn't change the name, but added a 'Calle' tag:
http://osm.org/way/364002698
acrague (2020-01-07 15:03:35+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to my attention and correcting my mistake. I promise to be more diligent to avoid making this mistake again.
user_5359 (2019-12-19 19:17:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please remember to delete the GPX track information from the OSM data
coeXL (2019-12-20 19:59:16+00:00): Hi. How i can delete it??
user_5359 (2019-12-20 21:12:39+00:00): I have already deleted these keys. The note applies to future GPX tracks you may want to upload.
eggie (2019-12-17 09:24:01+00:00): Dag Henk... Wanneer je een amenity=parking als node gaat invoeren op een vlak amenity=parking geeft dat een foutmelding. Beter die hele node verwijderen.
Doe je dat zelf?
MVG,
Eggie
GPX Speedtag (2019-12-17 12:17:07+00:00): In OsmAnd krijg je die vlakken niet goed te zien maar enkel een markering.
Maar ik zie nog wel meer bewerkingen die OsmAnd niet overneemt.
Een beetje te vergelijken met https://wheelmap.org/ maar die laat nog meer zien zelfs.
eggie (2019-12-17 12:49:12+00:00): Oke... Er zijn meer kaarten die parkeerplaatsen niet meer prominent renderen. Voorheen was het bv prachtig geel op de standaardkaart.., maar de vraag is om de duplicated tagging te verwijderen?
Eggie
GPX Speedtag (2019-12-19 17:24:42+00:00): Ik wil het wel verwijderen maar de vraag is of dit wel een duplicaat is. 
Een punt is iets anders dan een vlak.
Nu zie ik dat je het zelf al verwijderd hebt.
eggie (2019-12-19 18:44:52+00:00): Klopt... maar een punt en een vlak met dezelfde value geeft een foutmelding. Het is ..of..of.. , maar niet op beide manieren een parkeerterrein mappen. Je ziet het ook bij amenity=school. 
Het gaat er om dat er niet dubbel wordt getagd los van het feit of het een vlak of een punt is.
Andere dubbelingen zijn al door een medemapper verbeterd zie ik.
Mvg,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-17 09:29:30+00:00): Je tagt amenity parking n amenity=parking.
Je kunt gewoon de naam op het vlak zetten en die node verwijderen. Doe je het zelf?
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-12-17 09:33:04+00:00): De benzinepomp staat ook 2x op de kaart.
Het noordelijke deel zou je als building=roof kunnen omtaggen. 
Doe je het zelf?
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-12-17 15:40:20+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast.
eggie (2019-12-17 07:45:39+00:00): Dag svdhorts.. 
De religeuse bestemming is al verdwenen (klopt dat?) dus die tagging kan er weer af. 
De naam Don Boscokerk zou je gewoon op het gebouw kunnen zetten als die naam nog wordt gebruikt.
De nieuwe adresnodes kun je tzt laten importeren als de BAG is bijgewerkt. Verzoeken via het forum in het draadje verzoek BAG import. 
Je zou kunnen vragen of er al iets te importeren valt. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
zie ook.. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=kornoeljelaan&resultOffset=0&objectId=0772100000267631&geometry.x=162687.66697009&geometry.y=381421.45898954&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0772010000787018

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-17 07:51:54+00:00): Even terzijde.. Denk dat de landuse=construction van dat nieuwe wijkgedeelte ook kan worden aangepast als die woningen gereed zijn.
Carnildo (2019-12-18 09:49:21+00:00): Why did you delete the Mountain Standard Time zone?
Arctic gnome (2020-03-18 17:08:46+00:00): I differentiated between places on mountain time in the America/Edmonton zone and other zones on mountain time.
mueschel (2019-12-19 11:43:42+00:00): Hi,
the two areas you added in this changeset don't have any common and documented tag, only foreign ones. Could you have a look and fix this?

Thanks
Jan
Sal Mangiafico (2019-12-22 13:18:08+00:00): Thanks.  I fixed these. ~ Sal
Truchin (2019-12-18 14:00:34+00:00): Bonjour Yanis,

Sur les voies de la Cour Museum (Gare d'Austerlitz), pourquoi as tu supprimé le nom ?

Thomas
Carto'Cité (2020-06-24 14:14:17+00:00): Bonjour.
Merci pour ces mises à jour notamment sur les travaux de la gare d'Austerlitz. Pour info la suppression de la voie de service https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205227733 a pour effet de couper le cheminement piéton par la Cour Muséum. 
J'ai relié le chemin piéton à la voie de service pour corriger, mais peux-tu confirmer que cet accès est toujours ouvert ?
Merci,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoTransilien
Jose Luis Infante (2019-12-16 23:57:27+00:00): Hola,

por favor, usa la capa del Catastro, ya que la edición será mucho más exacta que dibujando a ojo.

También tienes la utilidad de "cuadrar" los edificios, ya que dibujando a mano alzada los ángulos de las esquinas no son de 90 grados.

También existe un proceso de importación de los datos del Catastro, por lo que el trabajo que estás realizando será revisado y modificado para que coincida con esos datos.

Un saludo!
impiaaa (2019-12-17 17:44:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note that when you save an edit, it is uploaded to the global database, for everyone to use. If you need to test something, there's a separate dev server. It doesn't look like this house matches aerial imagery, so I'm going to delete it. If you know that the house exists and the imagery is out of date, please say how you know about it in the changeset comment (two words isn't very helpful to know what changed). Check out the wiki for some more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page . Thanks for contributing!
mapman44 (2019-12-18 03:47:29+00:00): Please check the untagged landuse area along Southwest Riverview Lane in this changeset. Is it supposed to be "residential?" Please tag it correctly. Thanks.
literan (2019-12-17 18:01:23+00:00): Добрый день! для дворовых проездов используется тег highway=service. Я верну корректный тег.
Aspid (2019-12-17 18:11:32+00:00): Добрый день! Хорошо, спасибо за совет.
kogutowicz-mano (2020-04-06 19:08:12+00:00): A 756106768-as vonal nem power=line, hanem minor_line. Javítom.
hunsly (2020-04-06 19:24:57+00:00): ok
chnav (2020-01-13 15:16:44+00:00): Fully reverted. 
Mass edits using wrong mapping practice. These are T-junctions, not Y- or V-junctions.
Pellissippie (2020-01-13 22:53:10+00:00): I responded here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78033345
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 08:06:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/690841572/history has surface:pt = Asfalto that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
is surface:pt really wanted or a good idea? It seems a pointless duplication of surface tag to me - in which case surface:pt would be useful and wanted? Note that editors may have support for translating/presenting tag value in local language.

See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lAT
127logs (2024-04-25 13:37:09+00:00): Hello Mateusz, thanks you for reaching out! From what I can gather someone named Walter Schlögl was adding those tags around Brazil in 2014. I believe I combined 2 ways and adopted those tags. I agree that tag it is redundant and I would encourage you to change, delete or modify it  how you see fit.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 14:51:40+00:00): I removed it!
viloan (2019-12-17 01:28:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
solmaps2 (2019-12-17 02:15:07+00:00): szczegółowe, brak ostrzeżeń i błędów
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #MappingHuman