piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
changchun_1 (2017-08-10 12:56:59+00:00): Hallo gpermant, 
sind die Wege wirklich Fußgängerzone? 
Nur wenn dieses Zeichen http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_242.svg da steht ist es eine Fußgängerzone ansonsten path oder footway. Da du vor kurzem da warst weißt du sicherlich ob da ein solches Schid steht.
Gruß
Matthias
gpermant (2017-08-10 13:26:45+00:00): Hallo Matthias,
das ist 1. eine Baustelle und 2. wird es eine Gartenschau. Und da findet man üblicherweise keine Verkehrsschilder...
aber die im Wiki-Artikel dargestellte breite, asphaltierte Fußgängerzone trifft es genau.
Bei der Eröffnung im April '19 wird man sicher alle Kfz am Eingang zur Schau stoppen. Und nur die Gärtner und Rettungsfahrzeuge durchlassen, genau wie im Wiki beschrieben.

Btw, bist du ein Heilbronner?

Gerald
changchun_1 (2017-08-10 14:24:40+00:00): Hallo Gerald,
ja bin aus HN. Werde bei besserem Wetter die Lage mal mit Mapillary aufzeichnen. Ist schon ein bisschen her als ich das letzte mal dort war. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.15133541680649&lng=9.20847198686036&z=17.268797348824084&username%5B%5D=changchun1&pKey=jxXOyixc4JXWNx8DxPoWfg
Gruß Matthias
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 07:04:44+00:00): hey Ankit Keshav Baral welcome t o OSM, i appreciate your interest in mapping, i notice that you have added park and this it is over some buildings. could you please could you verify this . have a nice day
kreuzschnabel (2017-09-09 10:35:14+00:00): Thank you for your supplements, but this edit (and others) added numerous "dead ends" to the route relation of the Coast to Coast walk. The route relation is broken now and has to be fixed manually. Actually, I intended to do something else today :(

See route relation here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7336321#map=14/54.5070/-3.2339

Sample screenshot of the dead ends caused by your edits: https://www.pic-upload.de/view-33890695/c2c.png.html

What did u do – did you combine several parts of the ways into one single way? When a waymarked route is composed of existing paths and tracks, they often have to be split up into the parts that belong to the route and those who don’t. Recombining these parts breaks the route. Please take special care to keep route relations intact, they are highlighted on many OSM based hiking maps.

I do hope you have not done too much of those edits yet!
kreuzschnabel (2017-09-09 17:28:20+00:00): Another one: Please tag ways according to their size and traffic suitableness. http://osm.org/way/455174060 is definitely a track, not a bridleway, even if there is a public bridleway using it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines on how to tag public rights of way appropriately. Thanks!
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 07:01:50+00:00): hey Agnes00, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
saikabhi (2017-08-17 06:17:16+00:00): HI,

This way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514484312 does not look like a river to me. Can you please correct this?

Thanks 
Abhishek
freebeer (2017-08-18 08:57:07+00:00): After a quick review, all this user's changesets outside Nigeria, that is - in Texas, should be reverted, as they add fictional data.  They all use this same changeset comment.  See the nearby `MY HOUSE' to the northeast with some 250 metre walls...  And the TRAIN STATION to the north...
saikabhi (2017-08-18 09:07:43+00:00): Hello,
 
Thanks for catch. Can you go ahead and revert/fix this user's other edits also?

Thanks,
Abhishek
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 07:00:46+00:00): hey Agnes00, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
debugger (2017-08-10 12:39:40+00:00): Было бы круто, если бы название отражало суть изменений. Иначе сложно проверять.
Alecs01 (2017-08-10 14:27:13+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, il nome della linea degli autobus non è il nome della fermata, per dire quali linee passano da lì ci sono le relazioni, come queste: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2825730 http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2333261
askras (2017-09-11 19:30:13+00:00): Ты чего наделал?!? Зачем ленинский парк на весь лес растянул?
freeExec (2017-09-12 20:57:13+00:00): Просто нужно убрать теги парка с отношения. Если там один кусок всё же парк, то его нужно из отношения леса убрать и только на него повесить теги парка. Да и вообще там отношение не нужно, все три куска леса могут быть самостоятельные.
askras (2017-09-13 04:35:19+00:00): Ага, я поглядел в редакторе. Проще не откат сделать, а тег парка поменять на лес. Насчет мультиполигона - в большой части есть два-три места без леса, давно я их вырезал из полигона леса, а потом весь лес загнал в мультиполигон, тренировался так сказать.
mikkolukas (2019-03-21 16:52:51+00:00): Siden hvornår er biler blevet tilladt på den strækning af Boulevarden?
UffeKousgaard (2019-03-22 09:22:32+00:00): Jvfr. billeder på Google Streetview så ser det ud til, at der kører biler i begrænset omfang med ærinde. Der står et skilt på "Ved Stranden" med teksten "ærindekørsel", hvis jeg ellers kan se det rigtigt. Ensretning muligvis fra nord mod syd for ærindekørsel?
Hjart (2019-03-22 09:59:25+00:00): Uffe, vær opmærksom på at al anvendelse af Google Streetview i forbindelse med arbejde på OSM må anses for at være forbudt (se f.eks. https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps)
mikkolukas (2019-03-22 16:42:03+00:00): Skiltet står der ganske rigtigt i virkeligheden også og der er uoverensstemmelser mellem skilte i nord, syd og øst for området (nogle tillader varekørsel, nogle ærindekørsel mv.), så det er op til et skøn at vurdere hvad der egentlig gælder.

Folk har det med at "tage chancen" og krydser gennem området i bil uden at have et ærinde - men det har ikke betydning for hvordan der skal mappes.

Dog, der er intet sted i området hvor biler generelt er tilladt, som minimum er det motor_vehicles=delivery eller motor_vehicles=destination

Jeg har rettet hele området til i går aftes, i forhold til access :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68389492
UffeKousgaard (2019-03-23 08:26:46+00:00): Der var ikke uoverensstemmelser mellem de skilte jeg så, men jeg har heller ikke været rundt på alle sidegader. Måske næste gang jeg er i Aalborg.
marczoutendijk (2017-08-10 14:00:41+00:00): De namen die je aan de schuren hebt gegeven, staan die ook inderdaad op de schuur? Of is het de naam van de eigenaar?
PureTryOut (2017-08-10 14:02:09+00:00): Ik heb geen namen aangegeven, die waren al aanwezig. Ik heb alleen de types van de gebouwen aangepast.
marczoutendijk (2017-08-10 14:08:00+00:00): Ok, dan moet inspectie ter plekke uitkomst bieden.
PureTryOut (2017-08-10 14:10:16+00:00): Gaat dit over de namen "Groothagenbeek", "Kleinhagenbeek", etc?

Die namen zijn bekend "onder de volksmond" zo gezegd. Ze staan nergens op de gebouwen, maar iedereen in de omgeving kent de terreinen op die manier. Dit gebeurt behoorlijk veel in de Achterhoek.
marczoutendijk (2017-08-10 14:14:09+00:00): Inderdaad. Het is gebruikelijk om een naam aan iets te geven op OSM, als die naam ook inderdaad - controleerbaar voor anderen - op dat gebouw of object staat. Maar er zijn uitzonderingen: op de Eiffeltoren staat geloof ik geen naambordje.
PureTryOut (2017-08-10 14:38:52+00:00): Is dit goed dan? Anders moeten er denk ik een *heleboel* namen weggehaald worden in deze omgeving, en waarschijnlijk de hele Achterhoek.
marczoutendijk (2017-08-10 20:02:00+00:00): Op mijn huis staat een naambordje, en iedereen in de buurt die kent mij onder die naam. Toch zet ik op OSM geen name=zoutendijk op mijn huis omdat dat niet de naam is van het huis maar van de bewoner.
Als ik ergens een huis tegenkom waar met grote letters op staat: "Carpe Diem", dan zet ik dát wel op OSM. En schuren hebben over het algemeen niet echt een naam. Ik zal deze kwestie eens op het forum voorleggen.
Laat de namen voorlopig maar even staan...
marczoutendijk (2017-08-11 16:54:27+00:00): Ik heb nog even verder gekeken en heb gezien dat degene die die namen heeft aangebracht dat correct heeft gedaan omdat die boerderijnamen inderdaad op de boerderij zijn aangebracht. We gaan er dus geen probleem van maken. Wel oppassen om iets zomaar een barn te gaan noemen, want in de meeste gevallen die ik gezien heb gaat het om een woonhuis met de stal eraan vast, en dat is wat anders dan een schuur...
frenchy_r (2017-08-10 11:31:11+00:00): I was wrong, please ignore those changes.
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 06:58:55+00:00): hey gamboroedmund welcome to OSM, i appreciates your interest in mapping, i have noticed that you have added a leisure park toa bus terminus , where as it should be amenity: parking. made the necessary changes. have a great day
debugger (2017-08-10 11:46:06+00:00): It's a private paid parking.
Added primary phone number.
pitscheplatsch (2017-08-12 07:00:51+00:00): Hi ben chales, welcome to OSM. Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50999328
mueschel (2017-08-17 10:45:21+00:00): Hi,
you added some ways with only strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514499767
Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 06:49:59+00:00): hey maiha95, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
literan (2017-08-10 16:29:11+00:00): пивоварня Москва-эфес давно закрыта http://www.newsru.com/finance/14nov2013/efes.html - там сейчкас промзона неясного назначения. Также ты некорректно ставишь адреса. Сам поправишь?
literan (2017-08-21 12:27:26+00:00): раз молчишь - просто откатываю
carciofo (2017-10-22 10:17:57+00:00): Hi, can you please provide a reason for deleting the node for El Poblado? The changeset comment has nothing to do with the content of the changeset. If the deletion was in error, please revert your changes. Thanks.
hansonwj (2017-10-28 00:16:54+00:00): I deleted the node as I believed it did not provide any additional value. There is a node right next to it (344911539) also named El Poblado which has the tag place=neighbourhood. I believe neighbourhood is more appropriate but please feel free to edit the remaining node's attributes if you disagree.
carciofo (2017-10-28 07:25:38+00:00): Hi, thanks for getting back to me. The two nodes are actually correct, even if they have the same name, since they are at different administrative levels: one at the neighborhood level and the other at the commune (borough) level (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Poblado#Neighborhoods) You might want to have a quick look at the Good practice article (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice), especially the sections about verifiability, good changeset comments, and not removing things we won't understand. Things with place=* tags can often look weird, wrong or duplicated if one is not very familiar with the administrative structure of the area. If in doubt, you can always leave a note (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes) and someone more familiar with the area will eventually check it. Happy mapping! :)
user_6110846 (2017-08-21 18:38:27+00:00): Интересно а почему не общепинятое по немецки Molodjoschnaja-Straße. Ведь табличек на улице нет немецком . Значит нужно пользоватся обще принятым .   И зачем немецкий ведь он не является местным . Да здесь при  Царской Росси  были колонии немцев но сейчас потомки их общаются н8а местных румынском украинскоми или русском. Согласно Вики правил нужн о избегать транслитерации . Тем более в этом проекте хороший конвертор который справится с автоматизацией процесса.  Поэтому прекратите добавлять немецкий качество которого вызывает мног о вопосов.
zstadler (2017-09-26 12:42:45+00:00): שלום דוד-צבי,

תודה על העריכה!

In this changeset you have added a tracktype tag to
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491364619
.
Unfortunately, the value "grade3-5" is not an option. Please choose "grade3", "grade4" or "grade5". 
.
Even if only parts of the way are grade5, the way should be assigned with grade5.
.
תודה!
zstadler (2021-07-11 20:43:21+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52433250
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 06:48:23+00:00): hey miguelito0102 welcome to OSM, I  appreciate your interest in mapping, but I notice that you have added a park inside another polygon of the same name. I am fixing this . have a great day
Constable (2018-01-17 18:56:27+00:00): ciao, perché hai aggiunto il senso unico a questo tratto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39630501 ?
Non è a senso unico!
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
FreierFriese (2017-08-11 10:00:23+00:00): You were right, added oneway=yes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51027895
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51027842
tms13 (2018-05-24 21:07:08+00:00): This was still signed as closed when I passed last weekend - is it really open to all vehicles?  If not, then it might need motor_vehicle=no.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-10 14:19:48+00:00): Cześć, gdy rysujesz obszary jak pola, lasy, tereny zabudowane itp. - prosiłbym o nieprzyklejanie ich do dróg. To utrudnia potem edytowanie zarówno tych obszarów, jak i dróg. Dziękuję.
przemas75 (2017-08-15 08:11:00+00:00): Nie ma takiej linii 201 Gdynia-Kościerzyna.
Mamy już to też:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1711959#map=8/53.764/18.258&layers=N
Chyba coś innego miałeś na myśli?
user_6110846 (2017-08-12 15:53:50+00:00): Поясніть звідки ви взяли назву Коліївська і чом у видалили  Путейська зупинковий пункт . На сайті Укрзалізниці в розділі розклад руху зазначено Путейська.
nikiforov (2017-08-13 19:02:37+00:00): + Poliakoff Mykhailo
Назву справді не українізували ще. Поверніть «Путейську»)
user_6110846 (2017-08-13 19:11:16+00:00): я зроблю відкати  цієї правки і іншої попередню повністю  , якою він видалив зупинку за допомогою плаґіну в  Джосм
jc86035 (2017-09-02 08:25:16+00:00): Are you sure you tagged the correct way? This road should be destination=沙田 Sha Tin.
zwaygp (2017-09-04 13:28:11+00:00): My edit had just been transferring the information that was tagged incorrectly on the motorway junction node to a destination= tag on the link. Looking over the mapillary imagery it seems you are correct about the destination. Thank you for catching this I have changed it accordingly
Markus366 (2017-08-10 18:09:22+00:00): Hier gibt es weder einen aktiv genutzten Bunker, noch ein Truppenübungsplatz. Wenn das früher vielleicht mal so war, bitte dementsprechend taggen.

Markus
canfe (2019-07-26 15:30:39+00:00): Sono andato fino al casottino ma poi non ho più trovato traccia del sentiero
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514525019
Esiste davvero?
Usoei (2019-07-26 15:39:20+00:00): Si certo esiste ancora e' una traccia di sentiero! Alcuni pezzi si perdono bisogna conoscerlo, l'ultima parte e' bene evidente.
canfe (2019-07-27 06:47:46+00:00): OK, magari dagli una controllata e se puoi aggiungici la visibilità ed altre cose in modo che si capisca che è difficoltoso.
PS: saresesti interssato a riunioni di mappatori della zona?
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
GerdP (2017-08-27 08:20:21+00:00): Moin!
Bitte schau mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150239156
an, Ist es ein path oder ein track?
Bei 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107174492
ist noch mehr schiefgegangen:
highway=path;track
bicycle=no;yes
makren (2017-10-03 19:56:58+00:00): Hi,
Danke für den Mail-Reminder (Info über Diskussionsbeitrag ist nicht angekommen). Habe die Punkte korrigiert.

Gruß
Martin
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
Sanniu (2017-11-04 15:42:27+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426798020 - it's look like coming back in straight line - very unnatural, can you check?
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
trigpoint (2017-08-11 15:31:14+00:00): Hi, thank you for the edit however I have spotted that you have added a mapillary photo, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=8crBQK1pS4XgOgjOWTrQ9g&lat=50.88072166666666&lng=-0.539789166666651&z=17

This is a stile, not a gate, and should be tagged as barrier=stile

Cheers Phil
Jan van Bekkum (2017-08-11 19:06:46+00:00): Corrected
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:46:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
tarta (2018-08-15 23:17:36+00:00): Quais as fontes desses dados inseridos?
tarta (2018-08-15 23:20:24+00:00): Algumas rodovias não tem nenhuma informação em lugar algum como a SE-090 e nem a SE-040, nem a SE-466 que você criou
Vítor Dias (2018-08-16 01:19:25+00:00): Mapa rodoviário do SE no DNIT: http://www.dnit.gov.br/download/mapas-multimodais/mapas-multimodais/se.pdf
Tenho quase certeza que também encontrei mapas da prefeitura com essas rodovias mas agora estou no celular e não consigo verificar.
Vítor Dias (2018-08-16 01:22:48+00:00): Também tem o mapa rodoviário do DER-SE: http://der.se.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/geral-MALHA-sre-Model.pdf
tarta (2018-08-16 01:45:56+00:00): Algumas rodovias estão faltando realmente, porém, quando entra no perímetro urbano, a via pertence a prefeitura, uma malha que já existia. Já usei esses dois mapas para fazer o resto a malha do estado e passei pelo mesmo questionamento a exemplo da SE-100 que atravessa a cidade de Aracaju e segue pela porte Aracaju-Barra e continua o seu caminho normal e vendo o padrão estabelecido pela comunidade, não foi colocado dentro dessa via a tag Ref=SE-100.
Não sendo muito menos intuitivo saber de onde você tirou essas tágs dessas vias:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81096931#map=17/-10.91631/-37.08708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176969703#map=19/-10.92600/-37.07501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415380477#map=17/-10.92726/-37.08100
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82814297
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321392371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513998792
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81947349#map=15/-10.9715/-37.0538
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186036564/history#map=17/-10.91861/-37.06394
Sendo que todas estão dentro da cidade, administradas pela prefeitura desde a sua criação
Vítor Dias (2018-08-16 12:58:08+00:00): SE-040 e SE-462: http://www.semarh.se.gov.br/recursoshidricos/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/GEOPOLITICO-ESTADUAL-PERH-A1.pdf
SE-466: conforme mapa do DER-SE já mostrado.

Infelizmente não me lembro mais onde encontrei as informações da SE-050, pois faz muito tempo que editei essas vias.
Hjart (2017-08-10 14:59:26+00:00): Are you sure about this?
Ina_Es (2017-08-10 15:36:15+00:00): Everything looks like it. I might have a look when I'm on my bike tour from Berlin to Kopenhagen but you can find the place at google and also in the app bike&stay denmark.
Hjart (2017-08-10 15:38:09+00:00): I checked their homepage: http://www.heinoscamping.dk/, which says 47 B.

I've reverted your change already
Hjart (2017-08-10 15:39:33+00:00): Note that all danish adresses have been imported from our national register, which is why they can be expected to be quite reliable.
Hjart (2017-08-10 15:43:46+00:00): Note that I have also mapped the camp site, so it should be easier to find now.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
Hjart (2017-08-10 16:10:21+00:00): The homepage you added here appears dead. I've taken the opportunity to clean up the place
Ina_Es (2017-08-10 16:27:37+00:00): Oh thanks!
chillly (2017-08-10 16:52:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

It is a common beginner's mistake to use the name tag as a description. Does the trig point really have a name 'Orton Hill Triangulation Pillar' on a name board at the location? If not then just don't use the name tag - many things don't have a name.
mueschel (2017-08-19 14:17:14+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it has only foreign tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5026647150

Cheers, Jan
AndersAndersson (2017-08-19 17:06:58+00:00): I forgot to remove the tags added by the GPS. It is now fixed.