piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ovruni (2019-03-14 20:46:22+00:00): Utilizar building solo para el edificio. No hay necesidad de colocar nombre "Gobierno Regional de La Libertad" a cada edificio.
ovruni (2019-03-14 20:47:32+00:00): Y colocar "amenity=townhall" solamente para el área de la municipalidad.
ovruni (2019-03-14 20:49:58+00:00): No color edicio a la municipalidad, cuando hay otros edificios dentro.
highflyer74 (2019-03-16 14:08:44+00:00): Moin Benedikt und willkommen bei OSM!

Da Du neu hier und gleichzeitig im Werbe- / SEO Bereich tätig bist, will ich kurz ein paar Hinweise loswerden, damit Du OSM nicht ggf. falsch verstehst.

Grundsätzlich geht bei uns, im Unterschied zu Google, Qualität vor Quantität, da hier keinerlei kommerzielles Interesse besteht. Insofern eignet sich OSM auch nicht wirklich für Werbung. Falls Du kommerziell Einträge in die Datenbank vornehmen möchtest, sei so nett, dies möglichst präzise zu machen. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen. Auch werden bei uns nur Fakten eingetragen und keine subjektiven Informationen bzw. Werbeslogans etc.

Lies Dir vor weiteren Beiträgen auch am besten folgende Informationen durch:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Auch ist es sinnvoll, Dein Profil mit einem kurzen Hinweis zu Deiner kommerziellen Tätigkeit zu versehen, damit Deine Mit-Mapper einen Ansprechpartner im Falle von Unstimmigkeiten oder Nachfragen haben.

Solltest Du noch Fragen haben, melde Dich gern!
fragbenny (2019-03-16 15:24:13+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise. Das versteh ich auch alles und mir gehts natürlich auch um Backlinks, aber ich möchte natürlich auch über OSM gefunden werden, deshalb der Eintrag. Der Eintrag ist zudem so präzise wie möglich und Werbeslogans etc. habe und hätte ich nicht verwendet. Ich hoffe das geht so in Ordnung und klar halte ich mich auch in Zukunft dran!
highflyer74 (2019-03-16 17:11:36+00:00): Hallo und danke für Deine Rückmeldung! Die Einträge sehen schon recht gut aus. Bei Telefonnummern nutzen wir das internationale Format +49[Leerzeichen][Ortsvorwahl ohne "0"][Leerzeichen][Rufnummer]. Das Ganze ohne Striche, Klammern und weitere Leerzeichen etc.

POIs sollten nicht mit dem Gebäudeumriss verbunden werden, da sie so zu einem Teil des Gebäudes werden, was sie ja nicht sind (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6338383404). Dass heisst, wir platzieren sie innerhalb des Gebäudeumrisses dort, wo sie sich ungefähr befinden.

Dann noch wichtig: Der name=* eines Objekts ist auch wirklich nur der Name. In Deinem Fall also "fragbenny". Um was es sich handelt, besagt bereits das Haupt-Attribut (office=advertising_agency). Beschreibungen wie Webdesign etc. sollten mit description=* getaggt werden (siehe oben unter dem "Good Practice" Artikel).

Schönen Abend Dir!
fragbenny (2019-03-16 18:32:43+00:00): Danke, geändert. Dir auch einen schönen Abend!
StephaneP (2019-04-01 14:59:27+00:00): Bonjour Gabi46,

Pourquoi avoir transformé les "path" en "footway" ? "path" me semblait plutôt adapté à un type de chemin assez générique comme ceux que tu as modifiés autour des étangs. Non ?

A bientôt
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
StephaneP (2019-04-02 14:18:51+00:00): Je reviens sur ce que j'ai dit, footway va très bien aussi.

A+
Gabi46 (2019-04-02 16:33:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Les chemins autour des etangs et des terrains de sport sont exclusivement pietonniers, cela m'a donc paru plus logique !
Il y avait aussi de grosses erreurs de traces....

Cdlt,

Gabriel
maraf24 (2019-08-21 10:13:08+00:00): Marcpol od dawna nie istnieje, podobnie jak jego sklepy.
Z jakiej starej mapy skopiowaleś ten sklep?
abakus_uploader (2019-03-14 23:31:01+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-14 20:28:54+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! 

Thanks for your edits so far, most of them look great!

Unfortunately, in this case this wasn't the correct use for the park tag. Check the wiki for more information:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
eschube (2019-03-14 20:31:09+00:00): The neighbors use their backyards as a collective "park". My son and his cousins are all allowed to run through the yards. I'm not sure what to classify it as in that case. I guess it might not need a classification.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-14 20:36:59+00:00): It's probably one of those "limits on private information" cases:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

Verifiability is important on OSM, if I turned up and started running around in your backyards, you'd probably call the cops.
ElliottPlack (2020-10-06 12:07:42+00:00): Hey phil! I think node 1740497649 might be an error. Take a look.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-09 11:10:19+00:00): Viva Diogo,

Podes explicar o motivo de teres adicionados lancis no interior da praça do comércio, quando eles não existem?
mattmaxon (2021-09-20 23:48:26+00:00): I have been looking around the area of Mandeville Canyon and I haven't seen any web resources for the culvert as shown in the changeset. I found a LADPW storm drain system showing a storm drain but no natural subterranean drain https://egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com/maps/lacounty::ladpw-storm-drain-system/about
Clarke22 (2021-10-21 00:12:06+00:00): Sorry, the email alert for your comment went into my spam folder, just seeing it now.  Check out the LA City storm drains https://data.lacity.org/City-Infrastructure-Service-Requests/Storm-Drain-System/pjh9-xwfn
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-24 08:46:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6338585114/history - is shop=clothes best fitting?

Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Doutpost would fit better if that is place that has poor supply of products (or none) but allows pick up of orderer products?
eggie (2019-03-14 21:36:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Het gebied van je edits is veel en veel te groot. Svp niet schuiven in de editmodus. Dit kan grote schade veroorzaken aan de kaart door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-14 21:40:46+00:00): Je tekent een apron in een reeds aanwezige apron. Dat lijkt me niet kloppen. Dit is het gebied B-apron?
Wat is je bedoeling?

MVG,
Eggie
WFS-AMS (2019-03-14 21:42:26+00:00): Het was mijn bedoeling om de apron's een gebied aan te wijzing inplaats van een punt. (geofencing). Helaas is dat niet gelukt en ben ik overgestapt naar HERE.
eggie (2019-03-14 21:44:58+00:00): Oke .. Ik draai deze edit even terug.

MVG,
Eggie
WFS-AMS (2019-03-14 21:45:28+00:00): Top bedankt.
eggie (2019-03-14 21:46:31+00:00): Oke.. geen probleem..
reverted door Wijzigingenset #68153366
viloan (2019-03-14 21:20:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-03-16 06:25:10+00:00): Hallo! Du hast bei der Relation den Tag "to"="Mettingen" zu "Mettingen"="Bf" geändert. Kannst Du bitte mal prüfen, ob Du nicht "to"="Mettingen Bf" eintragen wolltest?
intschutschuna (2019-03-16 15:45:49+00:00): Stimmt. Wie auch immer das passiert ist, das gehört da nicht hin. Habs korrigiert, danke für den Hinweis!
Chris Fleming (2019-03-19 10:53:11+00:00): What's the logic of removing highway area's?
JonKrato (2019-03-21 16:21:33+00:00): Thanks for reaching out. I believe that area=yes combined with highway=* has been tagged incorrectly.

Here is a passage from the Wiki. 
"Using area=yes paired with existing highway=* tags would lead to unpredictable routing results and is only widely accepted and evaluated for highway=pedestrian".

References: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area.3Dyes_on_a_highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
ma-rt-in (2019-03-15 22:13:56+00:00): Hallo,
wenn du schon Straße aus dem Bauzustand in einen "normalen" Zustand nimmst, dann entferne bitte das nächste mal alle unrelevanten tags.
vg
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-04-01 06:34:38+00:00): Thank you very much for correct the spelling.
Carnildo (2019-03-15 08:44:24+00:00): "Secondary road" is meant for relatively major roads -- ones almost as important as US-2 -- not driveways.
GinaroZ (2019-03-17 22:33:14+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Unfortunately I've had to revert your changes as you have dragged some roads across the map and also added some duplicate POIs.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-14 22:51:25+00:00): Hi again!

What are you trying to map here? You've got a lot of duplicated tags all stuck on top of each other, but I'm not sure what this actually is?
santamariense (2019-03-14 23:42:18+00:00): No OSM temos por boa prática nunca apagar um objeto para desenhar outro novo. Isso tem o objetivo de manter o histórico de edições.
Bons mapeamentos. Duvidas? É só perguntar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68153950
santamariense (2019-03-14 23:43:08+00:00): * No caso ao invés de deletar para fazer um novo, o mais adequado é ir ajustando os pontos até ficar da maneira que julgar correta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68153950
Douglas Pereira Pasqualin (2019-03-14 23:45:52+00:00): Compreendo. É que o tamanho ficou grande e um dos cantos encostou na rua.  Quando eu tentava ajustar o canto eu acabava selecionado a rua e puxava ela.
Carnildo (2019-03-15 08:48:03+00:00): Pretty sure that the entire lake doesn't count as a swimming area.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-14 22:48:24+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your recent additions to the map.

Regarding this edit, there's no reason to add additional land use and leisure tags to this golf course. Even in Pokemon Go, leisure=golf_course is a nesting tag, everything else can just cause a tagging conflict.
Chris Fleming (2019-03-19 11:19:08+00:00): Hi - just wanted find out why you've removed details such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226551101 or layby area's such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199578352 - without putting back an alternative?
SK53 (2019-03-19 11:38:38+00:00): highway=* with area=yes is a perfectly valid, and is very widely used on highway=service & highway=pedestrian. The fact that such areas: a) render in peculiar ways; and b) are hard for routing engines does not mean that they are errors. There are numerous other examples of areas which need to be routable (parkland for pedestrians) so the "routing over area" problem will not go away. The generally acceptable approach is to provide a notional way feature in addition to the area. If the highway is a true linear feature then it is permissible to change highway=primary & area=yes to area:highway=primary. This latter usage is common in Polish cities. Laybys mapped as areas should be changed to amenity=parking, parking=layby. Deleting information on OSM because it is inconvenient is rarely a good policy.
JonKrato (2019-03-21 16:14:19+00:00): Here is a passage from the Wiki.
"Using area=yes paired with existing highway=* tags would lead to unpredictable routing results and is only widely accepted and evaluated for highway=pedestrian"

References:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area.3Dyes_on_a_highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
SK53 (2019-03-21 17:04:20+00:00): The wiki IS NOT the definitive guide to tag usage. It usually represents the opinions of a small number of people and may well be not representative of actual practice of mappers on the ground. 

highway=service with area=yes has 3000+ uses on OSM in the UK (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/service#combinations), many of which will be service yards, private driveways when an area has been micromapped,, or, in this example (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165123160) a specific use-case (a map for a legal case). Removing data which is reasonably accurate & meaningful is very poor practice on OSM, particularly if you do not know the area or why things were mapped. Not every use is the same as ones own, for all we know the person who originally mapped these might have been interested in measuring surface sealing not in the routable road network.
aly6 (2020-08-14 20:36:18+00:00): Hi,

You added railway=crossing tags on the nodes where the footpath sidewalk for Harlington Road East (way 676923120) intersects with the Waterloo to Reading railway line.

Judging by aerial imagery, it looks like this footpath bridges over the railway lines, instead of crossing them at the same level.

Was your edit a mistake, or is the aerial imagery out of date? I'm happy to fix this if it's the former - let me know if that's the case.
Cartografia OPS (2020-01-03 09:29:34+00:00): Ciao Kaitu, perchè hai nominato "Villino Riposo"? Non pensi che potrebbe essere una informazione poco significativa per l'interesse generale? Anche il nome della vicina "Baita Oriana", potrebbe essere ugualmente superfluo. A mio avviso troppi nomi non significativi creano confusione nella mappa. Fammi sapere la tua opinione, grazie.
kaitu (2020-01-03 17:21:02+00:00): Al momento non ricordo dove ho preso i nomi, suppongo di averli letti su qualche targa appesa all'edificio o al cancello.

Perchè superflui? Li puoi estrapolare da altri dati già inseriti nel database OSM?

Che siano di scarso interesse per l'interesse generale è anche probabile. Ma finchè sono corretti e verificabili, perchè non dovrei inserirli?

Che sulla mappa nomi poco significativi possano creare confusione è  possibile, ma quello è un problema di rendering.
Cartografia OPS (2020-01-03 22:38:39+00:00): Perdonami, ma sono ancora poco pratico in OSM; sicuramente hai ragione tu, ma mi riferivo proprio al rendering della mappa che osservo come fruitore esterno: ogni mappa ha una gerarchia di informazioni e gradi di sinteticità propri delle diverse scale di rappresentazione. Ma giustamente, come lascia intuire il tuo commento, OSM è molto di più del rendering di una mappa.
kaitu (2020-01-03 23:32:35+00:00): Nessun problema, ogni commento costruttivo è benvenuto. Spero che la complessità e tendenziale anarchia di OSM non ti scoraggi dall'utilizzarlo e dal continuare a contribuire.

Sono certo che col tempo apprezzerai anche la possibilità  di inserire dettagli di tuo interesse, senza preoccuparti troppo di quanto siano di nicchia. Finchè sono corretti, e descrivono qualcosa che ha una posizione definita, tutto è benvenuto.

Il rendering è sempre un compromesso, è impossibile accontentare tutti. Ma il bello di osm è che essendo i dati disponibili, ciascuno è  anche libero di crearsi un rendering come più gli gusta.

Ciao e buona mappatura!
KvK90 (2020-06-19 13:29:22+00:00): Ciao! Cortesemente, potresti indicarmi dove hai trovato la fonte che indicava che le uscite sarebbero state numerate? Che io non avrei trovato alcun riscontro.
Altra cosa: non dovrebbero avere lo stesso numero nella stessa direzione?
Grazie!
JJIglesias (2019-03-15 10:07:34+00:00): No hay etiqueta de layer para esos casos, pues no esta debajo del nivel de la calle (-1) eso es un tunnel=building_passage:

mas informacion: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
mumblin (2019-03-15 19:04:41+00:00): Gracias por la información y el recurso. Recordaré esto en el futuro.
viloan (2019-03-14 22:33:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DGerveno (2019-03-16 08:35:06+00:00): Algunas de las vías que has marcado como tertiary no lo son, no forman parte de la red de carreteras. Según su uso, deberían ser highway=unclassified o service.
ovruni (2019-03-17 06:11:01+00:00): Hola
Esta edición rompía la relación del convento (6586667). Ya fue reparado por otro usuario. Por favor mas cuidado al editar las relaciones. Para cualquier consulta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
carfog81 (2019-03-27 16:36:06+00:00): Por favor acostumbrarse a usar en los nombres la primer letra de la palabra en mayúscula. También es importante el uso del tildes y la buena ortografía
danielr297 (2019-03-27 21:07:17+00:00): gracias por el comentario lo tendré en cuneta para futuros cambios
pyrog (2019-07-06 10:03:51+00:00): Salut Antonin,
Merci pour tes contributions de supports d'antennes. J'ai effectué quelques corrections :
suppression du type de support de tag name, ajout ou correction des faisceau hertziens. Le tag est communication:microwave=yes)

Cordialement,
--
Yves

Pour info, tu les retrouves sur https://openinframap.org/#15.54/46.894152/6.35546 ou https://carte-fh.lafibre.info/index.php?no_sup_init=449560

449560 étant le n° de support (ref:FR:ANFR=449560)
user_1566574 (2019-07-06 10:12:53+00:00): Salut Pyrog 😊,
De rien !

Oui tu as bien fait, j'avançais un peu à tâtons là-dessus.

Pour ma part une partie des infos venaient de https://www.cartoradio.fr/, qui indiquait effectivement que ce numéro était celui de support.

Merci pour l'aide et les infos, je prends note ! :)

- Antonin
frosm (2019-08-08 13:09:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673230352
le name ressemble à un operator :) mériterait un fixme s'il n'y a pas de source valide pour trancher
eggie (2019-03-26 15:19:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:32:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156110 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2592 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:32:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156110 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2592 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:32:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156110 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2592 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:32:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156110 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2592 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
ovruni (2019-03-15 01:50:40+00:00): Hola
El nodo de camping esta diseñado para una zona de acampada: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site
Por favor utilizar la etiqueta de acuerdo al objeto que desea mapear. Para cualquier consulta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
Omar
GinaroZ (2019-03-14 23:30:49+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM - thanks for the edit and for resolving the note! :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:32:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 68155649, 68155659, 68155661, 68155667, 68155673, 68155680, 68155689, 68155696, 68155702, 68155705.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156275 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2593 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:42:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156275 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2593 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156275 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2593 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156275 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2593 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:38:37+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:42:55+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 68156117, 68156119, 68156121, 68156132, 68156135, 68156154, 68156159, 68156163, 68156165, 68156168, 68156172, 68156177.