piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abDoug (2017-07-19 20:20:32+00:00): I normally won't map inner open areas of buildings, since they aren't visible from ground level & I suspect there are only 3 balloonists world-wide who use OSM. Inner areas aren't wrong but I just don't consider them to add useful info in most cases. An exception might be for a public building such as a hospital.
 Landuse = grass IS dubious - see OSM doc


Method to fix this sort of thing if if won't render:
- delete all the tags that have anything to do with shape so only "line" forms remain
- select the outer and inner(s) and use the + (combine items) function in the "built in" OSM editor
- being careful to select the multipolygon, not one of the constituent lines, add tag(s), under "All tags", as appropriate e.g. building = school
I drew an additional rectangle for the "grass". It apparently should be possible to set the inner to be something, but I can't get it to work reliably. (the default "inner" will just be a hole through to whatever lies below, which would be the parking lot in this case)

It seems to me in the past that there was another way that worked, but I spent a whole lot of time recently trying to get an island into a pond. I tried a lot of things. This was the only way I could find that worked.

An aside for easy fix-up if you accidentally draw a closed shape using a line instead of an area:
You can't use "Change feature" box at the top of the tag editing window. Instead:
- select the line
- click on Line under Select feature type
 - add a tag under "All tags", e.g. building = school
Once something is tagged as something that is normally an area you can use the Change feature box - e.g. if you wanted a park but can't remember the proper tags, make the line into a building then use Change feature to turn it into a park.

I note you are naming parking areas. I consider this essential, since the mobile apps I've tried will give a completely useless list of unnamed parking areas & distances if you search for nearby parking. The only way to find out if the lot is usable is to examine it visually on the map. If a lot is named "Dr. Evil's School staff lot", you get the appropriate hint with a lot less effort. I won't map private residential parking at all, though I would definitely map visitor parking for a residential complex.\

Cheers!
hoserab (2017-07-20 00:34:35+00:00): I generally don't include inner areas of buildings either, but this building's inner area is actually clearly visible from ground level: the walls of the enclosing corridor on the east side of the building are mostly glazing. You can see right in from the street. When I first drew in the outline for Central Memorial it seemed kind of disingenuous to *not* include the fact that a big chunk of the inner area of the building is clearly a patch of dirt.

I agree landuse=grass is dubious, but I couldn't find anything more appropriate. 'Park'? The distinction between landuse=grass and landcover=grass is especially confusing...

As for parking lot tagging, I've been torn about what I'd been doing as many of these lots don't have any "name" per se and something like "shopping centre parking" is more a description than a name. Parking lots operated by the CPA and big parking companies (Impark, Indigo/WestPark, etc.) I definitely name with the company's associated lot #. I admittedly don't use any mobile apps so I haven't a clue what info they give about parking but I would hope a well-written app spitting out a list would include access! I try to make sure I've included access whenever I add a parking area.

Cheers
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-24 13:05:03+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3796529 ?
user_5359 (2017-07-19 18:30:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
Alan (2017-07-19 19:23:38+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Next time, if you are going to edit in two places in different parts of the world, could you do those as two separate edits? (Two "changesets" to use OSM terminology). 

Also, please add a comment in your changeset, so we know what you were doing. Thanks!
Glassman (2017-07-19 16:16:40+00:00): Adding an empty node doesn't do much and will most likely be deleted. It might be better to place a note at the future location of the costco site.
IrlJidel (2017-07-19 18:23:57+00:00): ' using G Maps'

You used Google Maps as the source?
eggie (2017-07-19 17:24:05+00:00): You created a clothes shop... but is it realy here at nr 17?
eggie (2017-07-19 17:33:27+00:00): reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50409793
edits makes no sense
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-20 12:47:18+00:00): HI, I see that on way 177305478 (steps up to lighthouse) you have added access=designated. This is not a valid value for access - did you intend foot=designated (i.e. a public footpath)? I also note that the adjoining paths have motor_vehicle=designated (not added by you) which seems an unlikely value for a path. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
Buschebabau (2017-07-20 15:57:35+00:00): Hi Mike,
I have now changed motor_vehicle=designated to motor_vehicle=no and removed access=designated, because i don't know whether the steps up to the lighthouse are accessible to the public. 
Thanks for informing me!
Buschebabau
Alexander-II (2017-08-17 01:11:10+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в ОСМ. Вы переименовали аптеку, но не изменили при этом тип на магазин и исправили остальные теги. В итоге получилась аптека с наименованием магазина. К тому же там открылся не Дикси, а Пятерочка.
mbethke (2017-07-24 03:11:40+00:00): Please don't put a category like "Temple" in the name field. place_of_worship is fine; to mark it as a Buddhist temple, add religion=buddhist. The name is Vat Sisangvone and was mapped already so I just deleted your node :)
DD1GJ (2017-11-09 07:13:23+00:00): Reverted due to inadmissible source Bayernatlas
RicoElectrico (2017-07-19 16:20:33+00:00): Dzięki, że sam skasowałeś, lecz prosiłbym wtedy o rozwiązanie stworzonej przez siebie uwagi.

Tutaj jest lista wszystkich Twoich utworzonych, zamkniętych i skomentowanych uwag: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nadol/notes
BikePC (2017-12-11 17:05:24+00:00): Misschien is hier nog wat aandacht nodig. Zie https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=676674#p676674
A67-A67 (2017-12-12 15:08:03+00:00): Ik had de route destijds (in juli) hersteld. De fouten waarover op het forum wordt gesproken zijn later ontstaan bij het veranderen van paden. 
Als de wegen waaruit een relatie bestaat gewijzigd worden, is dit in principe niet te zien in de geschiedenis van de relatie.
GerdP (2017-08-08 06:12:27+00:00): Moin. 
Du hast hier wohl versehentlich den
Knoten 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4126268585
verschoben. Mir ist allerdings nicht klar, was Du tatsächlich ändern wolltest.
Ich habe daher erstmal die komplette Änderung revertiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50934251
jaap de vries (2018-12-06 08:11:50+00:00): Dag naam genoot.
Ik kreeg melding van dat je een bag import hebt gedaan en bijna overal de straat Ooosterweg hebt ingevuld waar eerst de echte (originele) naam in stond. Ook in de bag staat de juiste naam.
Zou je bij een volgende keer in Wijchen en Nijmegen daar op willen letten?
Jaap de Vries
Nijmegen
GerdP (2017-08-31 08:18:18+00:00): Hi!
You changed a highway=service to highway=give_way here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508754007
I assume you wanted to change a node ?
I also think that service=bus should be removed. Consider to add bus=yes or psv=yes
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-24 06:30:31+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
compdude (2017-07-29 00:19:53+00:00): Please take a look at way 17134722 (Liberty Lane). Looks like it is tagged as landuse=residential AND highway=residential. Might wanna fix this... :)
MountainAddict (2017-07-29 14:07:07+00:00): Feel free to fix it. Thanks
GinaroZ (2017-08-09 16:47:30+00:00): Hi, just wondering why you changed this route to state=proposed?
Pawcio (2017-08-10 13:38:22+00:00): Hi. Because it is not signed - it doesn't exist in the field.
Rostranimin (2017-10-26 15:03:55+00:00): Just noticed this change (to proposed). Just to say that I approve. The fact that this has been mapped as a route has been bugging me for months. In the longer term I'm enthusiastic about us beginning to use some system for indicating what is and is not signed. I wrote some comments on the wiki here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Cycle_routes#Signed_and_unsigned
BurritoBazooka (2017-09-06 07:13:56+00:00): Can we have some evidence that there is anything on this island at all? Bing's aerial imagery seems to show nothing...

I'm fairly certain this whole island was edited on OSM as a joke ( http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/kekistan ) and the Bing image is accurate.

The editor may wish to try out their fantasy mapping skills here: http://opengeofiction.net/#map=5/51.500/-0.100
Ignobilis (2017-09-10 11:11:47+00:00): I know the island group and confirm it is undeveloped. I have deleted the edits. Its seems this is a joke or some form of protest/statement against proposed development of the outer islands.
maxolasersquad (2017-07-20 13:27:10+00:00): In OSM we always spell out the full name. In this case "Thomasville Road" is correct. I have fixed this.
DaxServer (2017-07-20 04:35:35+00:00): Thanks for updating, @mueschel !!
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
Leonmvd (2017-08-17 11:36:37+00:00): Hoi Martijn, ik zie dat je de fietsbaan in Drachten hebt ingetekend als track (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508779895/history). Deze is al aanwezig in osm als fietsbaan, wat is de reden dat je deze nogmaals hebt ingetekend?
arvdk (2017-09-20 19:42:12+00:00): Je hebt hier adressen toegevoegd die er al waren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2770776706 (bestaand adres)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4980276305 (jouw toevoeging)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4980276314 (jouw toevoeging)

Het is volgens mij niet de eerste keer dat ik dubbele adressen tegen kom van jou hand. Let er a.u.b. op. Hopelijk helpt de nieuwe plugin van Gertjan Idema.
Andere changesets met dubbele adres opmerkingen: changeset/37452986 changeset/36325115
Sander H (2017-09-21 18:46:02+00:00): Klopt dat er in de loop der tijd een heleboel dubbelen geimporteerd zijn. Kom er ook genoeg tegen van mijzelf en de anderen.

Oorzaak was (en is) dat de BAG plugin adressen die iets verschoven zijn als nieuw worden meegenomen en dat de JOSM validator ze ook nooit detecteerde.
M'n handen al vaak zat vol gehad om duizenden duplicaten die wel op dezelfde plek lagen en JOSM dus wel herkende op te ruimen.

Met de adresplugin gaat dit hopelijk tot het verleden behoren en worden de 23k duplicaten langzamerhand opgeruimd.
nammala (2017-07-20 03:55:53+00:00): Hi dgodoy89,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The park you have added is in the node form, the park should be in the way form. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Regards,
nammala
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
pangoSE (2021-05-25 08:52:40+00:00): Är det ett lean_to? Jag lägger till det, ändra gärna så typen stämmer.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
VictorIE (2017-12-22 01:45:05+00:00): Hi,

The water here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508793701#map=16/53.1224/-6.7339 seesm to be grossly over-stated. If you zoom in on the 'DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery', it shows the streams as quite modest.
Gianfranco2014 (2020-02-11 14:09:18+00:00): Ho visto che hai taggato la sella del Rotolon, ma dalla CTR della provincia di trento, è posizionata un po' più a Nord Est.
Solo per correttezza, volevo sapere da dove hai preso l'informazione e se è attendibile.
Grazie, Gianfranco.
Matteo Calosi (2020-02-11 21:38:23+00:00): Credo dalla segnaletica locale al bivio ma a questa distanza di tempo non saprei dirlo per certo. CTR Veneto e carta Tabacco comunque concordano entrambi con la posizione che avevo messo.
Gianfranco2014 (2020-02-12 07:05:24+00:00): Ho appena controllato, la CTR veneto la mette in un'altra posizione intermedia.
Ho pensato di chiedere al CAI di recoaro, qual'è la posizione corretta, se sei d'accordo.
Matteo Calosi (2020-02-12 17:56:55+00:00): Non ho obiezioni
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:41:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:41:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
M!dgard (2017-07-31 09:10:47+00:00): Your changesets from this one up to and including #50416733 have been reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/50713297 because they are a blind import.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
VincentOSM (2017-07-24 19:58:03+00:00): I don't know how to delete this, but: this is their official address, but apparently there's also the address of the front door around the corner that had apparently already been added...
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:43:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
eggie (2017-07-19 21:34:42+00:00): Info wederom  samengevoegd met adresnode.
mike140 (2017-08-23 11:40:28+00:00): Где Вы тут увидели съезд с третичной - вернул как было.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
mueschel (2017-07-20 11:04:09+00:00): ... and another set of 852 wrong address tags.
Andrew Matheny (2017-07-20 14:35:28+00:00): Fixed! Thank you
eggie (2017-07-19 21:39:39+00:00): Prima... en overgestapt op een echte editor zie ik !  Succes...

Bezoek ook het forum van OSM https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Zelfde inlog als je account. Jezelf evt. voorstellen kan onder het draadje Welkom.
P Kanzler (2017-07-19 20:40:47+00:00): Entschuldigung, der Kommentar ist schief gegangen. Ich wollte schreiben:

Kindergarten St. Albertus-Magnus Stein hinzugefügt
M!dgard (2017-07-31 09:06:34+00:00): Your changesets from this one up to and including #50417642 have been reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/50713151 because they are a blind import.
mueschel (2017-07-23 09:04:57+00:00): Hi,
you added some ways with these tags:
edited=true
import=yes
I guess these are not needed and can be removed?

Jan
VLD009 (2017-07-25 23:56:37+00:00): Hi Jan,
Thank you for your message! The import=yes is used to tag our contributions. This is further explained in the wiki [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing] where our process is documented. The edited=true tag is an internal tag and is not needed - we removed the tag. Thank you! -Yoko
rab (2017-07-20 19:52:01+00:00): only untagged nodes