piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Amegaz (2020-11-10 14:32:55+00:00): Hi tux67,
Du bist an der nördlichen Brücke. Der Durchgang ist an der südlichen Brücke. Schau: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/WAlcseWS8oTu9gQnDCteLQ
Links ist das graue Geländer der Brücke und vom Park her kommt ein weißer Zaun. Geländer und Zaun sind ca. 50 cm auseinander.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93863440
Amegaz (2020-11-10 14:32:56+00:00): Hi tux67,
Du bist an der nördlichen Brücke. Der Durchgang ist an der südlichen Brücke. Schau: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/WAlcseWS8oTu9gQnDCteLQ
Links ist das graue Geländer der Brücke und vom Park her kommt ein weißer Zaun. Geländer und Zaun sind ca. 50 cm auseinander.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93863440
tux67 (2020-11-10 14:52:36+00:00): ok, das wäre dann eher eine physische Zugangsbeschränkung, denn ein Verbot (Siehe Intro zu access im Wiki: "Der Schlüssel access=* gibt rechtliche Zugangsregelungen / Zugangsbeschränkungen für Straßen und andere Elemente an"). Ich nehme mal an, da steht kein Verbotsschild - man kommt nur nicht vorbei? 
Es könnte eine noch Wegbreite angegeben werden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93863440
tux67 (2020-11-11 06:19:27+00:00): Um es nochmal klar zu sagen - access rights sind nicht dazu gedacht die physischen Wegbedingungen und die daraus resultierende Passierbarkeit auszudrücken.
Solltest du bisher mit diesem Gedanken Access rights benutzt haben - schau dir deine Changes nochmal an.
Hier wäre vielleicht ein Node mit einem barrier angebracht, oder die Wegbreite anzugeben.

Gruß
tux67
Amegaz (2020-11-11 07:54:37+00:00): Habe die access rights am Anfang falsch verstanden. Mit denen wird die gesetzliche Regelung abgebildet und nicht der eigene Wunsch, wer hier lang soll bzw. wer hier lang darf.
Das Schild an der Einfahrt sagt: Lieferverkehr frei. Wäre also nur eine Einschränkung für motorisierte Fahrzeuge. Habe ich aber nicht abgebildet. War vorher auch nicht berücksichtigt.
Viele Grüße
Guido
tux67 (2020-11-11 09:05:32+00:00): ok, Hauptsache du passt alle deine Änderungen (nicht nur hier) dem neuen Verständnis an .. 

Gruß
tux67
Parzelle13 (2020-11-11 09:53:49+00:00): Auf https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.92419166666667&lng=6.349241666666671&z=17&pKey=UgSxn4nCdcs2sKpXbIaoOQ&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&x=0.4880760447336432&y=0.5229584841381135&zoom=0 
sieht man am nördlichen Ende des Weges (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37114713) folgende Beschilderung:
traffic_sign=DE:250,1026-35
Das wäre dann vehicle=delivery und sonst nichts. Lediglich Fußgänger/Reiter und Lieferverkehr (Fahrzeuge) dürfen den Weg benutzen. 
Siehe http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Das Verkehrszeichen (VZ), das als „Durchfahrt verboten“ bekannt ist, ist das Schild 250. Dieses kennzeichnet gemäß Verkehrsregeln ein Verbot für alle Fahrzeuge, einschließlich Fahrrädern. Reiter und Führer von Pferden oder Vieh sind von diesem allerdings ausgenommen, obwohl sie rechtlich als Fahrzeuge eingestuft werden.
tux67 (2020-11-15 09:57:02+00:00): @Parzelle13 - der Hinweis war gut @Amegaz - die Umsetzung in CS 94114907 hat's nicht ganz getroffen. Siehe CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94137414
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93863440
Intrinsical (2021-11-19 02:54:40+00:00): Why delete so much., just to add it back?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93863554
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Jan Olieslagers (2020-11-11 11:10:57+00:00): You have found that "removing" is not effective, why do you keep on trying?
Perhaps, if it ever recurs, a better idea is to tag it as "historical:" or "was:" - other well-meaning mappers might then be aware of the situation.
pio2_122 (2020-11-10 13:26:01+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś ten punkt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2688489773/history ?
Mariusz_Wxxx (2020-11-11 01:48:05+00:00): W żadnym rejestrze państwowych nazw nie ma takiej jednostki osadniczej.
pio2_122 (2020-11-11 08:52:06+00:00): Dzięki za wyjaśnienie, myślałem, że było to przypadkowe usunięcie.
Herman Lee (2022-04-13 02:44:42+00:00): Maybe you have added some wrong piers in this changeset.
SaikatM (2022-04-18 16:26:52+00:00): Hi Herman Lee, Thanks for bringing this to my attention, one of my team members was working in this area, I can see that way 869126618 is a weir (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:waterway%3Dweir), and way 860550931 could be a man_made=bridge(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge) as it is working as access to the park or this boat-shaped building. Please let me know if you have other thoughts. Happy Mapping!
Herman Lee (2022-04-19 06:55:49+00:00): Actually, it only has the function as lock gate...
SaikatM (2022-04-21 08:16:27+00:00): Hi Herman Lee, I have removed those piers. Thank you for the insights!
Patty Patty (2020-11-10 14:40:14+00:00): .
felipeeugenio (2020-11-10 15:13:45+00:00): Sir, Thanks for your time concerning about the stadiums in our country.
You just deleted the name of the whole sport leisure (leisure=sport_centre), which belongs the Huachipato FC (CAP). Which is used for training and other activities.
Other totally different thing is the stadium, which is used to play the official matches (leisure=stadium)
We have a lot of this centre´s type in our country. So please refrain from modifying them with out consulting the local community.
Nevertheless, I deleted the name of the stadium in the pitch. That was redundant.
regards
gebux (2020-11-10 14:50:31+00:00): Servus Clarkson,
für Forststraßen ist es besser "vehicle=forestry" zu verwenden. Damit werden alle Fahrzeuge (Rad, Auto, Motorrad, etc...) ausgesperrt, Fußgänger aber nicht.  "access=forestry" sperrt die Straße für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer inkl. Fußgänger. Bei diesen Tagging müsstest du nachträglich die Erlaubnis für Fußgänger mittels "foot=yes" nochmal explizit taggen.
Clarkson (2020-11-10 15:58:23+00:00): Danke für die Info, wurde korrigiert.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
bxl-forever (2020-11-10 13:54:11+00:00): Hello,
No longer a two-way road?
In that case, I suppose this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481692444) should be made two-way too, otherwise routing won’t use it.
Thierry1030 (2020-11-10 14:22:49+00:00): hello!
I forgot to modify that small part of Bd Bischoofsheim ... in the meantime I adapted it ... and here's the proof :-)
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Wa1ogHGmLmhg0K978lQXpY
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Bert Araali (2021-03-22 01:33:31+00:00): Reverted your changeset after it overlapped existing part of Isingiro town. Regards, Bert Araali. Please check imports accurately before uploading.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2020-11-10 13:58:43+00:00): Given the fluid nature of the current situation, I'm not conveinced that it makes sense to change "village" to "locality" in this way.  If hostilities really have ceased, it seems likely to me that people will return to former villages (from whichever side in the conflict holds them currently I guess).  Whether the village node (if valid) should be on the outer landuse way or a node is a different question.
Also, the use of "landuse=brownfield" here is surely incorrect?
SomeoneElse (2020-11-10 13:59:14+00:00): Учитывая изменчивый характер нынешней ситуации, я не убежден, что имеет смысл менять таким образом «деревню» на «местность». Если боевые действия действительно прекратились, мне кажется вероятным, что люди вернутся в бывшие деревни (полагаю, с какой бы стороны в конфликте они ни находились в настоящее время). Другой вопрос, должен ли деревенский узел (если он действителен) находиться на внешнем пути землепользования или узел.
Кроме того, использование "landuse = brownfield" здесь явно неверно?
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
eggie (2020-11-10 14:06:00+00:00): Sven.. even meegekeken.
Geen adresgegevens op buildingshape zetten. Er zal een adresnode zijn.
Iets aan gebouwen veranderen geeft problemen bij herimport. Je kunt wel aparte delen tekeken op de gebouwen met building:part=yes
en daar info aan hangen. Dat rendert dan niet, maar staat wel in de data.
Luchtfoto's vertekeken.. dus noot naar de dakranden kijken. Het gaat om het maaiveld en alles is precies ingemeten.
(Kadaster)

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-10 14:10:03+00:00): Gebouwen weer goedgelegd volgens BGT/Kadaster data. 
layer=-1 betekent dus onder de grond.
eggie (2020-11-10 15:41:56+00:00): adres verwijderd...
pio2_122 (2020-11-10 13:51:34+00:00): Tag name=* używamy tylko w przypadku, gdy nazwa jest faktycznie widoczna w terenie. Zapewne nie jest tak w tym przypadku...
DP24PH (2020-11-11 01:27:32+00:00): Due to repairs involving certain City Buses, P2P Buses, Modern Jeepneys, it may encroach certain parts of NCR (in fact, separation of DM morning and afternoon routes have occurred). Follow-up changeset is underway for certain routing validation. Your patience and understanding is highly appreciated, and always remember to be safe, be well, stay sane, you are loved.


DP24
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
AnonymousAlligator (2020-11-11 18:30:12+00:00): Please do not change street names to the names of businesses.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
gileri (2020-11-10 16:16:00+00:00): Bonjour,

crossing=marked pour les passages piétons signifie qu'il n'y a pas de feu piéton qui autorise le passage.

Lorsqu'il y a des feux, il faut utiliser crossing=traffic_signals

Je vois que tu as mis crossing=marked sur beaucoup de croisements alors qu'il y a des feux, c'est voulu ?

Plus d'infos ici :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:crossing

et en version anglaise un peu plus complète :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
eggie (2020-11-10 14:23:12+00:00): Oke, maar zinloos  dus als toevoeging. Wel of niet drive_through is van nut in de VS , waar je met de auto langs de ATM en post_box e.d. rijdt.
Wel kun je toevoegen  operator=PostNL
gr eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
eggie (2020-11-10 14:20:18+00:00): Beste mark.. 
Tip:
bicycle=no hoef je niet op wandelpaden highway=footway te zetten.
Dat is default.
Rijnveldsepad was dus goed getagd. 
Op een highway=path is het weer wel nuttig. Handiger is het dan om vehicle=no te taggen. dan vang je alle vliegen in één klap. 
MVG,
eggie
mrk1 (2020-11-10 15:46:44+00:00): Dank voor de input. Ik had het zelf ook al door. Ik ben vooral bezig met toestemming fietsen i.v.m. de data die verschillende apps gebruiken. Er wordt steeds meer op deze apps vertrouwd en zo kom je nogal eens op priveterrijn of voetpaden terecht.
eggie (2020-11-10 15:54:45+00:00): Op het forum loopt ook weer een draadje hierover. Vooral tracks die over erven lopen kan beter access=private worden getagd.
Bicycle=no alleen maar taggen als er een echt fietsverbod is. Dus niet bicycle=no op een erf of privetrack.. wel access=private
Mapse
Eggie
mrk1 (2020-11-10 16:24:09+00:00): Ok, doe ik! Ga op het forum ook even checken.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
eggie (2020-11-10 15:35:01+00:00): Tips.. 

Small corrections is je commentaar, maar dat zegt een medemapper niets.
wat waren je edits?
Graag concreet benoemen.

een highway=track heeft geen tracktype=grade1
Zoek zulke zaken op in de wiki. Het is de specificatie van een highway=track.
bicycle en foot=yes hoef je niet te taggen op reguliere wegen. Het is default. 
Wel moped en mofa=yes, want je het motor_vehicle=destination getagd.
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93867543
MVG,
eggie
Dave Venables (2020-11-10 14:30:04+00:00): In sealed containers for consumption off the premises at home
eggie (2020-11-10 15:31:25+00:00): Beste mark  Dit is niet de manier om iets op slot te zetten.
Dat gaat via conditional tagging..

Voorbeeld.
access:conditional=no @ (2020 Jan 20-2020 Apr 3)

Hoe gaan fietsers nu van west naar oost? 
Is dan tijdelijk oneway opgeheven?
Graag reactie
MVG
eggie
mrk1 (2020-11-10 15:43:18+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Thanks. Sorry. De noordkant van de kruising is tweerichting. Is ook al zo op de map. Dus oversteken en dan weer oversteken is het nu. Dit zal nog wel gaat veranderen maar dit is nu de situatie. Noordkant open twee richting, zuidkant permanent gesloten.
eggie (2020-11-10 20:21:16+00:00): Oke.. Neem aan dat je het in de gaten houdt.
MVG,
eggie
Vinber-Pro (2020-11-10 14:41:17+00:00): Bonjour,
votre commentaire et votre ensemble de modification est assez difficilement compréhensible.
Je pense qu'il est préférable d'éviter de trop grosses modifications quand on débute et de bien expliquer ce que l'on fait dans le commentaire. "Dis pas merci" n'est pas suffisant.
Mais néanmoins un démarrage un peu raté peut s'améliorer, vous trouverez ici pas mal d'info : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
Cordialement
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93867706
kartonage (2020-11-10 15:09:55+00:00): Since this changeset provides no meaningful change and contains vandalism/fictional data, it has been reverted in cs 93869925 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93869925).
Vinber-Pro (2020-11-10 15:15:48+00:00): thanks, i agree with you
Vinber-Pro (2020-11-10 14:31:01+00:00): hey,
On enregistre ce groupe de modifications, pour la postérité :)
Cela semble ok, basé pour l'instant sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:FrViPofm/Key:local_currency#XLT-EUSK
Kovoschiz (2020-11-10 15:59:50+00:00): 1, Please don't add `crossing=traffic_signals` where there isn't any crosswalk. 
2. `access=permissive` isn't used in this manner. 
3. `highway=motorway_link` already implies `foot=no` etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93867849
E de Wit (2020-11-10 14:57:10+00:00): Hoi Allroads,

Ik zie dat in deze wijziging veel knooppunten per ongeluk zijn verschoven. Om verdere schade te voorkomen, kun je zelf deze wijziging reverten? Anders kijk ik er vanavond even naar.

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=93867967#13/52.6973/5.8957

-E de Wit
Allroads (2020-11-10 15:20:26+00:00): Revert uitgevoerd.
Kwam er ook net achter.
Was met cut out polygon bezig.
Daar loopt een toponym polygon waar ik wel eens mee worstel, onverwachte cut out.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Sandal man (2021-06-24 21:10:46+00:00): Ik denk dat de bovenste garage wel 5 keer was geimporteerd, ben een half uur bezig geweest om ze uit elkaar te halen :-)
Gr. Jan
Jakka (2021-06-25 06:22:39+00:00): die was niet 3 maal geïmporteerd je hebt de volledige 3D constructie tagging eraf gehaald  ....
Je moet proberen alles eerst te gronde bestuderen en je niet laten verleiden door foute controle programma's zie de vernietigde 3D https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.7971214&lon=3.1846714&zoom=20
Sandal man (2021-06-25 14:18:29+00:00): Sorry als ik wat verkeerds gedaan heb maar waarom dan alleen foutmeldingen op die ene garage?
Sandal man (2021-06-25 15:59:28+00:00): Hoogte en kleur hersteld
pio2_122 (2020-11-10 14:46:37+00:00): Wkradł się błąd w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8101448847/history i https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8101448846/history
Zapewne chodziło o tag highway=toll_gantry :)
d3mol3k (2020-11-10 15:15:44+00:00): Poprawione :) thx
mavl (2020-11-27 14:30:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
sovereign_ch (2020-11-10 15:00:22+00:00): Hi, bitte beschreibe im Changeset-Kommentar jeweils die konkrete Änderung, die du vornimmst. Das Datum ist überflüssig, das speichert die Datenbank von sich aus. Happy mapping.
Kartennmacher (2020-11-10 15:05:06+00:00): Wege die übers Gebäude gingen etwas verschoben;
Adresse eingetragen
TrueWeast (2021-06-14 17:54:32+00:00): Hej osmviborg. Jeg set at du har opdateret færgeterminalet i Aarhus Bugt. Jeg har lavet små opdater at en nær vej, og har spørgasmål hvis der er mere ændrer i nærheden.
Tak, Trueweast

Hello osmviborg, I noticed you updated the data for the ferry terminal in Aarhus Bugt. I made a small update to the highway modeling near the ferry terminals, and I am curious if there are any further updates to this area.
Thanks, TrueWeast
Pernas (2020-11-10 22:05:51+00:00): As antigas imaxes si mostran una cobertura arbórea moito maior do parque. Cando dende o concello aplicaron a "solución" para acabar coa procesionaria do piñeiro que a súa vez acabou cos piñeiros do parque, a cobertura reduciuse considerablemente.
Rodrigo Rega (2020-11-11 11:50:36+00:00): Puxen as imaxes de Maxar e actualicei a cobertura arbórea. Morro un pouco por dentro cando vexo parques con menos árbores... Gracias polo aviso Pernas.
monesto (2020-11-18 17:09:50+00:00): La RN7 es autopista entre Luján y SA de Giles. Debe elevarse de categoría.
ququruzka (2020-11-10 17:10:21+00:00): пиши нормальные комментарии к изменениям.
eggie (2020-11-10 15:48:25+00:00): Oke..opgelost.. . maar op andere kaarten heb je weer andere effecten.
Bij landuse=residential op de OFM zie je ook vaak niet de landuse. Die ligt dan ook verstopt onder
 een tapijt.  
gr eggie
Qwajo OSM (2025-07-17 15:24:02+00:00): Hello Mapper, which imagery was used to map these features. Or is from local knowledge. kindly rectify
eggie (2020-11-10 16:50:14+00:00): Dag Also.. het is beter om alles op de adresnode bij te taggen. We zetten geen adressen op gebouwen zelf. Het klopt ook niet. Er zijn hier veel meer adressen. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-10 16:52:48+00:00): Info overgezet naar adresnode
AlsoAlbert (2020-11-10 18:42:24+00:00): ok. top, thanks. ik had alleen aangepast wat er al stond, maar ik snap dat dit beter is. thanks voor de tip.
mariotomo (2020-11-12 03:40:32+00:00): hola. veo que pides revisión de tu edición. qué duda tienes?
roaming-cow (2020-11-10 16:00:16+00:00): Was meant to write "added additional business contact information and opening hours" but got a little eager with the submit button. :)
tastrax (2020-11-16 03:00:40+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
whb (2020-11-11 10:13:50+00:00): Guten Tag EneB,
schon wieder eine schrottige Bearbeitung.
Bitte verbessern und mache deine Softwaretests bitte in der Sandbox und nicht auf der Live-Datenbank...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-11 11:40:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 93924514 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 93872055. Please do not use the public production database for testing. Use the options described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing instead!
ququruzka (2020-11-10 17:10:14+00:00): пиши нормальные комментарии к изменениям.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-11 13:38:56+00:00): Thank you, but please don't remove the `ref=`.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93872313
Kovoschiz (2020-11-11 13:42:18+00:00): next time
Vinber-Pro (2020-11-11 07:48:38+00:00): Salut,
je dirai acces=no
et opening_hours:covid19=same car je suppose qu'ils répondent au téléhone et au mail aux heures de bureau non ?
My2cents
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93873360
Vinber-Pro (2020-11-11 07:50:56+00:00): oups : access:covid19=no 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Covid-19_-_how_to_map#R.C3.A9sum.C3.A9_des_principales_cl.C3.A9s
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93873360