piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Verdy_p (2016-03-19 22:38:20+00:00): Also, your threat of dwg is unfair. the current boundaries of "islands" are very approximative (these are only "motus") and none of them are the "baseline" which is the adminstrative boundary for *local collectivities* (but not for the prefectoral administration of France which includes the territorial waters)
There was before this change absolutely no boundary defined at all for communes. I'm ADDING them
woodpeck (2016-03-20 17:06:08+00:00): Why were over 4000 ways and 49000 nodes touched in an edit that supposedly only fixes a few boundaries? Was this a mistake?
Verdy_p (2016-03-21 08:11:00+00:00): it started locally (in the Kerguelen islands where most of the nodes and ways are located), then there were many affected dependant relations, I checked many of them and found some of them were broken locally and I fixed them, there was also several edit conflicts on them and to solve them I had to decipher them, and reorder them to make sure nothing was missing and they were still connected.
Thie main reson is that the international border of France covers a large area in the world.
This was not a mistake and it took about one week to solve all problems before uploading sometying that should have taken less than a few hours.
Verdy_p (2016-03-21 08:11:28+00:00): Note: this is discussed on the French OSM talk list.
mueschel (2016-03-21 20:55:24+00:00): Hi Rps333,
could you explain all the tags on this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404482224
There is a lot of information, but no key is a standard OSM key that can be understood by other mappers and software.
Jan
Rps333 (2016-03-22 00:12:38+00:00): Thought I removed those tags. Removed. Thanks
Aleks-Berlin (2016-04-05 20:02:09+00:00): please do not remove the name-tag !
many tools require this and it is used worldwide!
the official name is name,
translations use name:lang,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
Aleks-Berlin (2016-04-05 20:11:27+00:00): there is only 1 official name (e.g. Ortseingangsschild) which is typically in local language.
sofasurfer68 (2016-04-06 15:31:56+00:00): Thanks for pointing out my mistake.
I'll check the next day even if I deleted more name tags.

Greeting sofasurfer68
5m4u9 (2016-03-19 05:31:30+00:00): Gracias por añadir el lugar.

Mejoré con la información de su página el área y oficinas.
smaprs (2016-03-19 16:07:31+00:00): Hi, suggestion to further changsets: split changes by regional jobs to avoid comments on "what have French borders to do with local South American history of edits?"
Verdy_p (2016-03-19 22:53:04+00:00): In fact thoese changes affect the international borders of France in one relation that covers most of the world.
Changes were made locally (first in the French Southern and Antarctic territory and then there were errors in dependant relations that impacted French Polynesia, and some parts of the French border around the Sarre river. I did not change anything in South America, except one maritime border in French Guiana, which was related to the change of the international relation for France).
I had to do these related changes to avoid breaking other dependant relations
user_5359 (2016-03-19 10:43:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dnursing_home.
maxerickson (2016-07-05 18:44:11+00:00): Hi- 

Thanks for the updates.

In general, the information in the "ref" tag should not be repeated in the "name" tag. "ref" is short for reference and is used in OSM for short alphanumeric identifiers.

Sometimes a road will have a name that uses the ref, but it should be more than just a combination of the various road numbers.


Max
alexz3 (2016-03-19 04:17:18+00:00): The answer to your question is that you deleted a beach path.  Just because you don't see it from aerial imagery doesn't mean it's not a path.
alexz3 (2016-03-19 04:20:36+00:00): And I'm not sure why you moved the railway tracks.  Paul Norman had the bcmosaic imagery lined up well in the potlatch2 map sets.
alexz3 (2016-03-19 04:53:32+00:00): here's what your railway edit looks like using openmosaid (check with pnorman if you think he didn't align the imagery)

http://imgur.com/a/IDoWi
alexz3 (2016-03-19 04:54:40+00:00): people walk from 24th ave to Crescent Beach along the beach as part of their walking route.
alexz3 (2016-03-19 04:55:11+00:00): typo - openmosaic.

Best of luck in mapping.  Alexz.
utack (2016-03-19 09:30:03+00:00): that is interesting, because in JOSM paul normans images are in another place and it does not complain that the projection method needs to be changed.
http://i.imgur.com/lu4Yr6o.png
So are Bing images 
http://i.imgur.com/FbAnVqg.png
and Mapbox
http://i.imgur.com/jgz3NsN.png
and the GPS traces of that area are mixed, but the one on the rails was sometimes left sometimes right of the new position
http://i.imgur.com/ql9h0YI.png

However in iD editor, the aerial images seems to be further right indeed.
Thanks for checking that stuff, I will try to contact pnorman and find out what is going on with JOSM, I wanted to do some more stuff, and it should not all be misaligned
utack (2016-03-19 09:39:30+00:00): Something odd was going on with my JOSM. I reset all the settings to default and the train tracks are where they should be. Sorry for messing that up, i will move them back to their original location ASAP
utack (2016-03-19 09:54:11+00:00): Is anything else from my edits misaligned or just the railway track?
alexz3 (2016-03-20 08:44:01+00:00): Thanks for the fixes.  Take care.

I remember the days when Yahoo imagery was aligned but the early Bing imagery wasn't aligned, then it was aligned depending on what country you were in.  Unless someone goes into the Amazon with a GPS to align tracks to, some imagery and jungle roads in South America and Africa will likely never be aligned for years.
*Martin* (2017-01-21 21:52:37+00:00): Hello. Please don not place one landuse over another but fix the existing one. Otherwise you create even more mess than it was. Thanks.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
das-g (2016-08-31 13:56:13+00:00): Is this a real, existing island? I don't see anything on current Bing imagery there.
mweper (2016-03-19 12:09:57+00:00): Hola serock. Viendo esta edición, me parece que tienes un error de conceptos. Por favor, lee esta documentación donde se explica que no se debe poner la categoría del PDI en el nombre.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names#Nombre_es_s.C3.B3lo_el_nombre

Por favor, revierte esto, ya que estaría mal y por favor AGREGA UN COMENTARIO DE LO QUE HACES EN TUS EDICIONES.
Saludos.-@mweper
pertile (2016-03-20 02:09:28+00:00): Ya lo revertí.
mweper (2016-03-19 12:09:32+00:00): Hola serock. Viendo esta edición, me parece que tienes un error de conceptos. Por favor, lee esta documentación donde se explica que no se debe poner la categoría del PDI en el nombre.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names#Nombre_es_s.C3.B3lo_el_nombre

Por favor, revierte esto, ya que estaría mal y por favor AGREGA UN COMENTARIO DE LO QUE HACES EN TUS EDICIONES.
Saludos.-@mweper
pertile (2016-03-20 02:07:49+00:00): Ya lo revertí.
mweper (2016-03-19 12:08:58+00:00): Hola serock. Viendo esta edición, me parece que tienes un error de conceptos. Por favor, lee esta documentación donde se explica que no se debe poner la categoría del PDI en el nombre.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names#Nombre_es_s.C3.B3lo_el_nombre

Por favor, revierte esto, ya que estaría mal y por favor AGREGA UN COMENTARIO DE LO QUE HACES EN TUS EDICIONES.
Saludos.-@mweper
pertile (2016-03-20 02:08:09+00:00): Ya lo revertí.
mweper (2016-03-19 12:08:38+00:00): Hola serock. Viendo esta edición, me parece que tienes un error de conceptos. Por favor, lee esta documentación donde se explica que no se debe poner la categoría del PDI en el nombre.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names#Nombre_es_s.C3.B3lo_el_nombre

Por favor, revierte esto, ya que estaría mal y por favor AGREGA UN COMENTARIO DE LO QUE HACES EN TUS EDICIONES.
Saludos.-@mweper
pertile (2016-03-20 02:08:25+00:00): Ya lo revertí.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
mweper (2016-03-19 12:07:44+00:00): Hola serock. Viendo esta edición, me parece que tienes un error de conceptos. Por favor, lee esta documentación donde se explica que no se debe poner la categoría del PDI en el nombre.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names#Nombre_es_s.C3.B3lo_el_nombre

Por favor, revierte esto, ya que estaría mal y por favor AGREGA UN COMENTARIO DE LO QUE HACES EN TUS EDICIONES.
Saludos.-@mweper
pertile (2016-03-20 02:08:44+00:00): Ya lo revertí.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Nakaner (2016-03-19 10:41:38+00:00): Warum hast du von den Streckengleisen name=Marschbahn entfernt? Das ist ein gültiges und gebräuchliches Tag. Ich möchte dich bitten, dass du die Entfernung rückgängig machst. Vielen Dank.
Fischkopp0815 (2016-03-19 12:57:26+00:00): name und ref sind doch Eigenschaften der Gesamtstrecke und nicht der einzelnen Teilstücke. Wofür gibt es sonst diese Relation, in der alles vorhanden ist.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5435589

Ich habe es trotzdem rückgängig gemacht, auch wenn ich es an den Teilstücken falsch finde.
Nakaner (2016-03-19 13:01:17+00:00): Wenn du deine Meinung als richtig erachtest, musst du entweder ganz Deutschland umtaggen oder das Konzept der Relation ändern.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
AMDmi3 (2016-03-28 19:47:06+00:00): Вы не соединяете улицы:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.16533/54.93247&layers=D
Ambush (2016-03-21 08:07:20+00:00): Почему удален highway?
poornibadrinath (2016-04-14 06:57:12+00:00): Hey, @BlessSonic
You should not be using Google/yahoo as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Also there is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck (2016-04-14 22:07:10+00:00): You have deleted a couple of important roads in this changeset, which I reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38570274 - please be careful with the delete button!
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:30:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Hjart (2016-03-19 08:18:41+00:00): Cykelstien her kan ikke ses på Bing og ej heller Geodatastyrelsens fotos fra sidste forår, så jeg vil mene det er noget misvisende kun at angive Bing som kilde.

Hvis der er tale om en helt nybygget cykelsti anbefaler jeg at angive http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date.

Jeg sætter også pris på at man angiver surface
peterleth (2016-03-21 06:53:58+00:00): HejMichael 
Helt enig - tingene skal være i orden. 
Cykelstien er ganske ny - og jeg regner med at få tegnet den ordentligt ind. Beklager at jeg fangede Bing som kilde. De opmålinger jeg må lave til cykelstien bliver selvsagt ikke fra et luftfoto.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
SomeoneElse (2016-03-23 13:57:06+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401407063 really called "Barn" given it's location?
Chetan_Gowda (2016-03-21 12:22:49+00:00): Hi anusha, 

 Great progress in mapping roads. Improved in tagging roads. Few observations here to rework too. 
1. Always split the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404430404/history|https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404527188/history|https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404430396/history|https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404419498/history
2.If the roads aren't clear in the imagery, do not trace them. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404524598/history

Happy mapping!
Chetan_Gowda (2016-03-21 12:36:47+00:00): Sorry the above links are broken!!
1.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404524598/history
2.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404419498/history#map=17/28.46999/77.18602
3.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143562778/history
4.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143562778/history
Supaplex (2016-03-20 11:21:30+00:00): 好茂密XDDDD
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-03-20 19:34:08+00:00): По Абая ввели автобусную полосу и запретили многие повороты на лево. подробности например здесь: http://kolesa.kz/content/articles/2015/06/kak-teper-ezdit-po-abaya/
chnav (2016-03-21 04:24:41+00:00): Повесьте пожалуйста на тот отрезок какое-то объяснение в note, на яндекс-панораме я увидел знаки движение по полосам, светофор. Вполне возможно кто-то сделает такую же ошибку.
chnav (2016-03-21 04:25:36+00:00): ... в смысле увидел знак "полоса налево".
joost schouppe (2016-03-21 17:19:05+00:00): Dag Els,
Je hebt niet gedaan wat je wou doen. Je hebt de weg verboden gemaakt voor iedereen, met enkele uitzonderingen. De situatie was reeds gemapped om fietsers tegen de richting toe te laten. Dus ik heb het hersteld naar hoe het was. Als er iets niet klopt, laat maar weten.
Joost
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Illio (2021-09-27 19:33:29+00:00): Zdravím, prosím, je nejaký dôvod, prečo je budova "Dornyk" rozdelená na viacero (vrátane napr. tohto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404531516/) a miesto name=Dornyk je tento názov uvedený ako lokalita?
Jose Riha (2021-09-28 21:38:35+00:00): Ahoj, ten tenky "sliz" som zrusil - naozaj vyzera, ze nema opodstatnenie. Rozdelenie na dve budovy som vsak nechal - podla Ortofotomozaiky je tam jasny predel a teda sa jedna o dve samostatne budovy.

V case, ked som uvedene miesto mapoval som si nebol isty, ci Dornyk je nazov projektu, budovy a vobec ako sa tieto veci maju do OSM zanasat. Ak mas tuto vedomost, prosim uved to na pravu mieru.

Vdaka, j
Illio (2021-09-28 21:42:29+00:00): Dornyk je názov budovy, ale nie som si istý, ako to zaznačiť, ak je to zakreslené ako dve samostatné budovy.
Jose Riha (2021-09-28 21:58:35+00:00): Mozno by sa to dalo riesit aj takto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/952144057
Jose Riha (2021-10-13 20:17:14+00:00): Bol som to pozriet a budova nie je nijak viditelne prerusena, takze som obe oblasti spojil a locality presunul. Diky za report. j
przemekscj (2016-03-19 11:54:11+00:00): Dlaczego drogi serwisowe w  Brzegach zostały oznaczone jako construction?
Nie ma żadnych znaków zakazujących ruchu.  Wyglądają na dokończone, z oznakowaniem, widać ślady użytkowania także przez miejscowych mieszkańców.
slodki (2016-03-20 08:56:51+00:00): Byłem przedwczoraj, jest oznakowanie, barierki, taśmy oraz ciężki sprzęt. Jedynie droga w kierunku zachodnim wzdłuż Serafy (nie ma jej jeszcze naOSM) nie była zagrodzona
przemekscj (2016-03-20 17:01:25+00:00): Ok, jak śmigałem rowerkiem i ślady robiłem to wszystko było otwarte. Pewnie kolejne prace rozpoczęli.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Peilscheibe (2016-03-19 22:00:58+00:00): Was meinst Du genau? Zumindest kann ich sehen, dass das grassland-MP nicht korrekt ist, da geht ein Bogen nach Westen raus.
RrPt (2016-03-19 22:45:06+00:00): ja, genau den habe ich nicht entfernen können, das Grasland ist nur noch im Osten, der Rest ist Baustelle
Peilscheibe (2016-03-19 22:52:52+00:00): Du benutzt ja JOSM: markiere den Weg über den wir sprechen, halte die Shift-Taste gedrückt und klicke mit der linken Maustaste auf den Punkt an der "T-Kreuzung", also da, wo der Bürzel abzweigt. Jetzt ist der way und der Punkt gleichzeitig markiert. Drücke jetzt "p" (Linie aufspalten), dann markiere den Bürzel alleine und lösche ihn. 
Einfach, oder? Mit "p" kannst Du jede Linie aufspalten, je nach Situation musst Du Linie und Punkt(e) oder nur den Punkt markieren.
RrPt (2016-03-20 15:12:36+00:00): Habe das nun behoben
ja, das trennen war nicht das Problem, aber anschließend ist links noch immer der Bürzel, allerdings jetzt alleine.
Der verwendet aber die gleichen Punkte wie 2 andere Linien und ist noch in Relationen enthalten.
Ich hoffe das passt jetzt so
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Peda (2016-04-24 10:50:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
AMDmi3 (2016-03-28 19:40:59+00:00): Называйте, пожалуйста, улицы в соответствии с http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
user_2759225 (2016-03-29 15:07:33+00:00): Ну вообще я старался ему следовать, может быть, конечно, где-нибудь и упустил что-то.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Peda (2016-04-24 10:50:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
joost schouppe (2016-03-21 17:13:14+00:00): Bonjour rafouche,
J'ai du supprimer votre hotel, puisque c'etait deja sur la carte, comme node. La zone que tu avais marqué comme hotel est ausi beaucoup plus grand que l'hotel meme.
luiswoo (2016-03-19 11:29:30+00:00): А что так мелкотравчато, в ручную. Есть overpass turbo в помощнике вводим зарос -- 'cladr:code'=* or 'cladr:name'=* or 'cladr:suffix'=* in 'Ростовская область' и будет счастье.
Тут у Краснодарского Края сельских поселений не хватает. Наименованных дорого между НП меньше половины.
А тут тебе простенькая задачка, зато глобальная, извести клард теги -- "она очень нужная" на фоне другого, но не требует особых усилий.
Noro Hibu (2016-03-19 11:37:32+00:00): У каждого свой вклад в OSM)
А "мелкотравчато" потому, чтобы если вдруг найдутся несогласные в каком-то конкретном месте - могли просто откатить, нежели будут весь субъект или что-то большее трогать.
luiswoo (2016-03-19 12:23:03+00:00): "несогласные в каком-то конкретном месте" -- в каком, это безобидный мусор.
simlox (2016-10-19 14:55:52+00:00): Hallo mortmort,
du hast im März in diesem Changeset mit dem Kommentar "Korrektur" zwei Auffahrten gelöscht. Handelt es sich um eine temporäre Sperrung oder um eine dauerhaft veränderte Verkehrsführung?
Viele Grüße
simlox
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
trigpoint (2016-03-19 12:52:05+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37938026