piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:37:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
Noen (2022-05-14 10:39:18+00:00): Ops. Du festet stien i et vannrør. Hold inne «alt»-knappen mens du tegner for å unngå festing.
Anders2 (2022-05-18 10:32:40+00:00): Ah! Takk
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:50:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
acsd (2022-05-14 20:14:07+00:00): думаю парк здесь не особо подходит
Tim Apelov (2022-05-14 21:52:43+00:00): Ну его ещё считают урочищем, но это тоже не подходит. Скорее такой лесопарк получается. С учётом Стратегии Казанки перспективы скорее эко-парка/городского нацпарка
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:45:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:50:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:40:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:40:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:40:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
HellMap (2022-05-16 11:38:16+00:00): Hi! What was your intention with adding a refuge/pedestrian island to the crossing? There is a "waiting location" for pedestrians, but that's not an island.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:39:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:38:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:48:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:47:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:46:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:45:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
dgitto (2022-05-15 06:00:04+00:00): ricordarsi di chiudere le note, dopo averle risolte
giorgio92 (2022-05-18 18:44:34+00:00): ciao dgitto, quali note risultano ancora aperte ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:40:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:46:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:46:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:39:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
Hadi Omid (2022-05-14 16:59:49+00:00): سلام
بخشی از امیرنیا که حذف کردید وجود داره. ویرایش های شما معمولا دقت نقشه رو پایین میاره
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:48:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:38:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:51:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:44:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:46:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:46:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:47:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:43:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
ljb_nj (2022-05-15 14:35:14+00:00): Hello, I agree with the name correction to US-9 within Galloway Township - South New York Road, changes to North New York Road at East Moss Mill Road.  But I think you are wrong when it crosses from Galloway Township into Port Republic, at the Nacote Creek bridge.  I believe at that municipal boundary the house numbers reset to single digits and the road becomes just New York Road, so the name was correct before your change. My evidence is US Postal Service address lookup and State of NJ parcel database. 

Do you have specific evidence that this is North New York Road within the city of Port Republic's boundary?
RamanKazadoi (2022-05-17 10:06:42+00:00): Hi! Thank you for reaching me out!
I have checked your source (NJ parcel database) and take your point. The border between Port Republic and Galloway Township goes along the Nacote Creek. On the Port Republic's side this street has a name of New York Road.
I strongly apologise for my mistake and appreciate your vigilance and cooperation.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:45:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
Chincha1 (2022-05-14 12:14:27+00:00): It's not grass are you local user, it is incorrect data modeling
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120974734
janolezab (2022-05-14 13:42:58+00:00): Hello Chinha1 and – welcome to OSM.

I am quite sure it is still grass, as the west part of it was checked by me a few days ago. I mapped the rest from aerial imagery.

You seem to be sure there is no grass. May I ask how you surveyed that?
janolezab (2022-05-14 15:56:55+00:00): Hi again Chincha1, FYI: I just verified on the ground what I mapped, and it is correctly tagged as grass.

Your source for "It's not grass" seems to be unreliable and it would be interesting to hear what it is.

Yes, I am a local mapper, are you?
Chincha1 (2022-08-19 11:28:16+00:00): hey Jan, thanks for the confirmation
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:47:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:40:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:44:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
ImprovingStepByStep (2022-05-31 19:06:05+00:00): Thank you for the cross-harbour update. However the removal of the 'subway' => 'yes' on a number of stations seems to break the subway validation of apps using OSM data. See e.g. https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/china.html
ImprovingStepByStep (2022-05-31 19:16:20+00:00): As a consequence e.g. the east railway line is not shown in some apps.
Kovoschiz (2022-06-01 15:22:45+00:00): I have been adding `train=yes` to them, as I was told there was a compromise to make East Rail Line and Tuen Ma Line as `route=subway` on `railway=rail`. I must have accidentally removed some `subway=yes`. However they are in reality mainline trains upgraded as rapid transit. I have been contemplating to change them to `route=train` altogether.
Kovoschiz (2022-06-01 15:29:28+00:00): How do stations affect the line?
ImprovingStepByStep (2022-06-02 09:53:08+00:00): Thanks! I already updated some of the stations to subway=yes. But  there are still a few other issues I was unable to fix. See https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/china.html under Hong Kong for the specifics.
ImprovingStepByStep (2022-06-02 09:57:47+00:00): I'm not sure how to deal with the subway vs trains that also drive underground. You have it in London as well and as far as I know they are mapped as subway.  Currently if they're only designated as train, apps that consume OSM data such as Maps.me and Organicmaps won't show the line for HK. Main thing in my opinion is to be consistent with other OSM data.
ImprovingStepByStep (2022-06-02 20:47:33+00:00): Please disregard my comment on London. According to the wiki the station needs the station=subway (or light_rail) or subway=yet set for metro lines. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping. The validator and downstream apps probably expect this. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance#subway-preprocessor and https://github.com/alexey-zakharenkov/subways for details.
trial (2022-05-16 11:47:10+00:00): Bonjour, hi.
This seems to be a copy of a database. This is NOT legal except if you obtain the writen exception by the owner of the data.
On top of that you're misusing several attributes  like name (here you but a short description), charge=gratuit should be fee=no, etc...
Automatic edit is forbidden except if explicit OK is given by the community.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:50:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
user_2066394 (2022-05-14 13:57:46+00:00): Mit access=private eintragen?
BeKri (2023-03-18 00:00:55+00:00): Servus,
hoffe Du bist noch erreichbar.
Du hast beim Armbrust-Schützengilde Winzerer Fähndl e.V.
2 mal eingetragen:
emergency=water_tank
survey:date=2022-05-14
water_tank:volume=100000

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9739398252
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9739432417

Frage: wirklich 2 Tanks oder Versehen ?

Gruß derBeKri
Mwehr (2023-03-18 00:07:37+00:00): Es handelt sich um einen Tank.
BeKri (2023-03-18 00:57:52+00:00): alles klar,
dann mach ich einen drauf
Danke fürs feedback
Filip009 (2022-05-22 20:57:55+00:00): Dobrý deň, dávate si prosím pozor na spájanie cesty a hranice. Najlepšie ako sa tomu vyvarovať je skryť hranicu. Pri editovaní v pravej časti je "mapové údaje" (klávesová skratka "U"). Potom rozkliknúť mapové objekty a kliknúť na hranice, tak aby tam políčko nebolo zaškrtnuté.
user_5359 (2022-05-16 11:07:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1060059626 (one of two). What is the meaning of the tag ç = yes ?
suricata88 (2022-05-16 15:41:18+00:00): Hello, it was a typing mistake :) it's building=yes

Thank you!
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:38:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:49:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
luiswoo (2022-05-14 13:33:36+00:00): На япанорамах тут ни какого запрета нет, кроме ограничения скорости в 20км\ч. Треки так же в наличии.
literan (2022-05-15 11:45:25+00:00): и зачем вы паровоз на дорогу сдвинули?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9101649714#map=12/55.6542/37.5588
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:45:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
luiswoo (2022-05-14 13:38:58+00:00): Тут нет запрета движения по всей улице, а волне конкретные шлагбаумы, не перекрывающие движение по большинству участков. Шлагбаум ставиться на точку, включенную в линию (то есть если в редакторе её потянуть, она потащит за собой линию дороги).
BaboucheVerte (2024-04-17 14:18:13+00:00): Hi, it's still written "Central Avenue" on the ground, are you sure the name of the road changed ?
contrapunctus (2024-04-17 14:24:11+00:00): Hello! I don't even remember making this change, and I don't go here very often. If I made a change, I definitely saw it on a sign (= probably legit) while passing by in a vehicle (= may be mistaken).

I could go on foot to take a look in a day or two.
BaboucheVerte (2024-04-17 14:26:14+00:00): Perfect ! I was there few hours ago and I only saw "Central Avenue" written, but I'm from Europe, so maybe don't understand perfectly all the sign in Delhi ;)
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:39:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
Hezza Fezza (2022-05-14 12:53:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:41:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:44:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
Sir Vey (2022-05-14 18:22:57+00:00): Hey, welcome to contributing to OSM, TMHarper! I'm looking at this changeset because it was marked for review. It mostly looks good to me, but you included a note indicating that 1117 North 27th Street actually has two addresses now: 1117 and 1119. The building outline is still tagged as 1117 so 1119 doesn't appear on the map.

The usual way to deal with this is to remove the address tag from the way that is the building outline and instead add two nodes that are inside the outline or part of the outline where the entrances are, and tag them with the appropriate address tags. Hopefully this link works: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/69302/multiple-addresses-for-same-object

Anyway, welcome again! Feel free to reach out to me and I hope you enjoy lots of happy mapping in the future!
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:48:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
ScottWalkerAU (2022-05-15 07:38:31+00:00): Partially reverted in 121002015 to bring back the suburb label as a member of the relation
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120978931
AndrewS (2022-05-15 08:16:45+00:00): Sorry about that. Must have had a brain explosion.
ScottWalkerAU (2022-05-15 11:22:36+00:00): No worries
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
emersonveenstra (2022-05-14 17:17:34+00:00): Hi,

This changeset removed part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1056539721, but on all satellite imagery the path still exists. Did you remove it during an on-site survey?
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:50:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
user_5359 (2022-05-26 14:37:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9739631659. What is the meaning of the tag Gorlice = Sąd Rejonowy w Gorlicach?
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:44:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:41:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:51:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
marc__marc (2023-05-15 11:08:28+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/746620789
vous avez rrenseigné que le parking vélo n'est pas couvert, mais vu sa positionn, se trouve-t-il dans le batiment ou est-il mal positionné ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Shaun das Schaf (2022-05-31 10:20:01+00:00): Hallo SingletrailMap,

warum wird hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988300845 der Name von "Pirschweg" auf "Plotzenweg" geändert und hier von "Pirschweg" auf "Hotzenweg"?

So wie ich das sehe, ist "Pirschweg" korrekt, ist auch vor Ort mehrmals so ausgeschildert.

Und bist du sicher, dass dieser Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59449662 mtb:scale=2 hat? Als ich ihn vor einem Jahr gefahren bin, war das noch ein ganz einfacher Pfad, der auch von einem Anfänger problemlos befahren werden kann.

Ich bitte um Klärung...

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Shaun das Schaf (2022-05-31 10:34:59+00:00): Sorry, Link vergessen.

Hier von "Pirschweg" auf "Hotzenweg":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336435642
Ride Trail Map (2022-05-31 11:25:41+00:00): Ich war Anfang Mai da und der Weg ist mit Hotzenweg beschildert. Die Schilder sehen relativ neu aus.
Shaun das Schaf (2022-05-31 11:34:36+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort.

Was du meinst, sind wahrscheinlich die tatsächlich sehr neuen Schilder des "Hotzenpfad". Dabei handelt es sich aber nicht um den Namen des Wegs, sondern um eine Wanderroute:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13890386

Diese Wanderroute ist tatsächlich sehr neu (gibt es erst seit knapp einem Jahr).

Der Pirschweg ist Teil dieser Wanderroute, heißt aber trotzdem "Pirschweg". Ich war gestern dort um unter anderem den Namen zu überprüfen und an zwei Orten ist der Weg auch als "Pirschweg" ausgeschildert".

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
user_5359 (2022-05-17 09:19:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9739674934. What is the meaning of the tag driving = yes?
user_157189 (2022-05-17 23:37:15+00:00): I'm glad you asked. That was an experiment.

I could not find in the Wiki any type of sign post to describe this kind of directive freeway information sign. The closest I could find was "guidepost" but the kinds of guides (hiking, skiing, etc.) were not useful, since this since is meant to direct drivers. Hence, "driving."

Is there a better kind of tag to use for this kind of sign?
user_5359 (2022-05-18 03:26:48+00:00): Did you mean something like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourist_sign?
tourism=information 
information=board
 board_type=sight
 inscription=Kloster Kamp traffic_sign=DE:386.3
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:47:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data