piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2022-08-26 15:31:02+00:00): Hi Jamila, 

welcome to OpenStreetMap! The data you put in the map is public to anyone, don't put personal information as "My old home". In general, use the name tag for proper names only and not descriptions.

Good mapping :)
Diacritic (2022-08-29 04:33:16+00:00): Hey Melb_Guy.

Do we have permission to be using metromap data? I don't see it on the resources page on the wiki
melb_guy (2022-08-29 05:10:48+00:00): The Terms of Use (https://metromap.com.au/documents/Aerometrex_Data_Licence_Agreement.pdf) states "You may incorporate data extracted from the Products in documents
(e.g. project deliverables, reports, maps, brochures and other
printed or Digital material) for any purpose as long as these
documents are not offered for resale to third parties or otherwise
distributed to third parties for monetary value. To avoid doubt, you
may use such data extracted from the Products in perpetuity after
the expiry of any licence to the Products, provided that such use
remains in accordance with the terms and conditions contained
herein."
aharvey (2022-08-29 06:21:04+00:00): "...so long as these documents are not offered for resale..."

OSM's license allows for OSM data to be offered for resale, therefore the Metromap Terms of Use are not sufficient to use their imagery to derive data for inclusion in OSM.
Diacritic (2022-08-27 11:06:48+00:00): Hello,

This edit is incorrect, and results in intersecting roads at the intersection. You've also reintroduced a separate way where there is no physical separation.

I have already explained, at length in different changeset comments, why this mapping practice is not correct.

Ignoring accepting mapping practice is not acceptable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125387104
eggie (2022-08-26 06:10:59+00:00): Hoi Kees.. Kijk even hoe ik de routering weer goed krijg in de Frits Vogelstraat voor fietsers.

Op de hoofdrijbaan
bicycle:backward=use_sidepath

Dus tegen de richting van de weg (niets met eenrichting te maken) wordt de routering voor fietsers naar het nieuwe fietspad gedwongen. 
Gaat verder prima zo hier in Zwijndrecht.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-26 06:49:03+00:00): Nog wat leesvoer over de tagging van fietspaden.
In JOSM kun je die als presets in je menu krijgen. Dat scheelt een hoop getyp. 
Presets: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31077 

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

Nu is Zwijndrecht niet overal even duidelijk..  en zelfs inconsistent.

Zo kan ik met mijn 'speedbike' geen gebruik maken van de snelfietsroute F16  Dordrecht -Rotterdam, want het zijn daar G11 fietspaden in Zwijndrecht.
kees444 (2022-08-26 12:04:14+00:00): Hoe test jij die routering?

Want als ik op openstreetmap.org probeer een route over dat nieuwe stukje fietspad dat ik gemaakt heb te laten lopen, lukt het niet. Hij pakt altijd de Frits Vogelstraat zelf.
eggie (2022-08-26 12:47:03+00:00): Precies zoals jij doet, maar de updates van osrm en graphHopper duren gewoon een dag of langer.  Dus als je het verder in de week probeert dan zul je zien dat het wel werkt.
Meestal test ik ook nog met de OpenFietsMap.
Die draait bij mij in Garmin Mapsource en in mn gps. 

Mapse.

eggie
eggie (2022-08-26 13:01:43+00:00): Kan wel even duren, want de routering op de Karel Doormanweg werkt ook nog niet, want de kruising met de Surinamestraat stond vorige week op voetganger...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=51.81058%2C4.63851%3B51.80812%2C4.63123#map=17/51.81083/4.63593&layers=N
Groet
eggie
hanchao (2022-08-29 08:24:23+00:00): 这里的类型不太对，shop=bakery是面包店。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bakery
Dead_Bush_Sanpai (2022-08-30 00:46:15+00:00): 我虽然知道，但我是从三方软件 vespucci 添加的，一眼扫过去没从 shop food 里面找到，就随便点了一个。
user_2066394 (2022-08-26 09:29:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244454382
cash_withdrawal:fee=no ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244454384
Gibt es eine Rückenlehne?
user_2066394 (2022-08-28 08:59:04+00:00): nachbereitet
rene78 (2022-08-27 11:14:36+00:00): Hello Pascal Malaterre, please never delete big amounts of work from other users before consulting with them. Thank you.

Bonjour Pascal Malaterre, veuillez ne jamais supprimer de grandes quantités de travail d'autres utilisateurs avant de les consulter. Merci.
Pascal Malaterre (2022-08-27 11:51:37+00:00): Ok, i understand.
My bad, sorry.
I won't make any more changes.
rene78 (2022-08-28 08:26:15+00:00): But please don't get discouraged by my comment. Any help is appreciated. Just be careful when deleting.
Diacritic (2022-08-27 11:04:08+00:00): This change is incorrect.

There is no physical separation at the service road to the west.

I have already explained, at length, the reasons why this is incorrect mapping practice on other edits.

Ignoring accepted mapping practice is not acceptable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125389651
nevw (2022-08-28 10:23:10+00:00): Hi Luen
the additional land of Pinnacles National Park should have an outer role in the relation.
Luen Warneke (2022-08-29 01:55:56+00:00): I'm not exactly sure how it all works. I've added an outer boundary - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125499990

But you will have to doublecheck it. Thanks
nevw (2022-08-29 03:01:53+00:00): I fixed the MP to have one outer way for the new area.
I notice that this new section of the NP is included in Protected areas of Queensland published:
28 Mar 2022
so will update the MP boundaries in the new few days.
Luen Warneke (2022-08-29 03:40:23+00:00): Thank you.
nevw (2022-08-31 02:13:11+00:00): I have updated the boundary of Pinnacles National Park now using Protected areas of Queensland - boundaries - 2022
geoaria (2022-08-27 16:12:25+00:00): هر مسیر به صورت جداگانه با یک خط مجزا رسم شود و حتما تقاطع ها به هم متصل شود. نوع تقاطع با تگ متناسب با محل تگ گذاری شود (پل ، تونل و ...)  ترسیم شود و ترسیم ها اگر دقیق نباشد در مسیریابی بی فایده و نقشه را پر از خطا می کند محل خطای تصحیح شده : 32.45274/51.53359
Frans S (2022-08-26 09:06:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125390173
Frans S (2022-08-26 09:07:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125390173
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-08-26 06:41:26+00:00): Source - user feedback and local traffic rules. #mbx_usa_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125390184
michael60101 (2022-12-15 12:00:31+00:00): The Rural Municipality of Cornwallis should be tagged as "boundary=administrative" and not "boundary=aboriginal_lands" as it is not a First Nations reserve.
NFZANMNIM (2022-12-15 14:46:39+00:00): yes, that was a mistake. Thank you for fixing
Frans S (2022-08-26 09:04:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125390924
Frans S (2022-08-26 09:00:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
H: Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.

This is a rather difficult project to map.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125391252
Frans S (2022-08-26 09:00:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
H: Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.

This is a rather difficult project to map.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125391252
To_ar (2023-02-17 14:56:02+00:00): Thanks for the contribution, but this bar has been added in the middle of the street, do you meant the "Bar Allo Statuo" at the corner? If this is the case this node could be delted...
oba510 (2022-08-28 07:40:40+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13997987/history looks more like a motel than a hotel?
orthocircular (2022-08-26 15:39:08+00:00): Looking good!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125392961
Piskvor (2022-08-26 13:24:42+00:00): Ahoj, hranice MČ jsou už kompletně zmapovaný podle dat z katastru (ČÚZK) - Nusle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/434063#map=14/50.0611/14.4401 a Vršovice: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/428842#map=14/50.0680/14.4499

Tady pod tím mostem je to nějak vyznačený?
(Jinak teda source= se používá k označení zdroje dat, tj "jak tohle víme" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:source )
oba510 (2022-08-28 07:45:33+00:00): Hi, a couple of things:

Did https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2335908268/history get turned into a Crate & Barrel?

What's up with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6582417968/history ?  Did the name really get changed?

The operator for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5870674310/history should probably be the Transbay Joint Powers Authority?  The SFMTA doesn't operate the bus deck.

"San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District" is the correct name for the BART district.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9979293770 doesn't actually exist.  Yerba Buena Lane intersects with Market Street, but because the streetcar tracks are in the center of Market Street, and the street is 
much wider than the tracks, Yerba Buena never actually interacts with the tracks and there is no rail 
crossing. Everyone either turns left or right at Market.  Because the map is a simplified diagram of what really exists and streets are represented by single lines you sometimes get weird artifacts like that.
user4816003805 (2022-09-05 17:36:09+00:00): I've reverted a few changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125824604.

CB2 is a division of Crate & Barrel, but isn't a Crate & Barrel itself. There also used to be a Crate & Barrel near Union Square, but it recently went out of business.

Trailblazer Cafe in Salesforce Park isn't a Starbucks, but is probably operated by Starbucks. I'm actually not sure if it's open currently, but the sign is still there.

I've changed the operator for https://osm.org/node/5870674310/history, but admittedly I'm not sure how to verify this "on the ground".

Also, thanks Dogman15 for resolving one of my fixmes (https://osm.org/node/9919959747)! :D
It's a pain to add brand info using OsmAnd.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
BCNorwich (2022-08-26 13:38:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Information from the County Council website says Ironstone Lane is an unclassified Publicly Maintained (Adopted) highway. Further, there is a Public Right of Way that terminates on Ironstone Lane, PRoWs must terminate at a publicly accessible place. At both ends, signs say "Single track road, No passing place for 1 mile".  I would think the gates are for stock control.

As it seems this is a way open to the public I've amended the tags.

Regards Bernard.
MikiDi (2022-08-26 09:59:52+00:00): Salut Marine,
S'il s'agit des bornes de recharge uniquement pour vélos, svp spécifier
bicycle=yes
motorcar=no
Comme ca, en utilisant la carte, on sait distinguer si une borne sera utile pour un cycliste (et ne pas pour des voitures électriques) 
Plus d'info à trouver sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station#Vehicles
Merci!
BCNorwich (2022-08-26 13:45:43+00:00): Hi, Again information from the County Council website says Stone Penn Lane is an unclassified Publicly Maintained (Adopted) highway. As it seems this is a way open to the public I've amended the tags.

Regards Bernard.
Jillis inactivE (2022-11-06 18:33:44+00:00): Beste Arendvane, 
bedankt voor het toevoegen van het nieuwe gebouw van de VVV.
Deze had echter toegevoegd moeten worden met een importverzoek uit de Basisregistratie Adressen en Gebouwen, dan komen ook de adressen mee (Oosterspoorplein 1 en 3) waar de VVV vervolgens op vastgelegd kan worden. Zie hier hoe ik dat gedaan heb: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394
limes11 (2022-11-12 22:36:34+00:00): Hi

Magst du kurz hier was schreiben?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3438629

Du hattest den Weg gesperrt.

Übrigens: access=no reicht, die übrigen no's haben dann keine Bedeutung mehr

Danke, Limes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-27 11:07:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125438483 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal data in western Ukraine
jcr83 (2022-08-26 19:36:21+00:00): Ce sentier existe réellement et est LE sentier utilisé par tous les randonneurs qui vont au sommet du grand Capelet. D'ailleurs, on le voit très bien sur les photos aériennes près du lac Autier. Si vous estimez que "trail_visibility=intermediate" ne correspond pas bien à la réalité, vous pouvez mettre par exemple "bad" ou "horrible", mais il ne faut pas supprimer le sentier dans OSM. Je l'ai rétabli.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-29 13:07:47+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3582237 ?
matema (2023-07-29 17:50:09+00:00): Sprawdziłem teren, obecnie nie trwa tam budowa, a sama budowa kamienicy jest w planach
pitfire (2022-08-26 09:32:19+00:00): Hallo linuxuser,
das passt nicht zusammen!
Discordant maxspeed and source:maxspeed
linuxuser (2022-08-26 09:59:06+00:00): Hallo,
richtig, hab ich übersehen, ist korrigiert.
Danke!
Hufkratzer (2022-08-27 17:16:53+00:00): Hi, I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065076254 looks like a riding arena (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena) in the aerial view, but you have tagged it with leisure=horse_riding, which is for complete riding centres (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding).
abakus_uploader (2022-08-26 22:31:04+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-26 22:33:15+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
pio2_122 (2022-08-26 08:43:51+00:00): Na zdjęciach lotniczych jednoznacznie widać, że nie ma tam mostów, tylko przepusty.

Niestety, mimo uwag od innych użytkowników (https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=13948004) i moderatora (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5322) w dalszym ciągu kontynuowane jest to samo postępowanie - czyli masowe rozwiązywanie "ostrzeżeń" bez ich weryfikacji.

W związku z tym: zmiana wycofana.
SekeRob (2022-08-26 10:23:40+00:00): actually it is to be description:it ;o)
oba510 (2022-08-28 07:49:07+00:00): More comments (sorry!):

barrier=wall looks odd on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377918799/history .  Underground structures aren't usually mapped as walls.  Maybe the train box could be represented with some kind of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:indoor tag?  I'm not sure about this one.

For https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2616701810/history I don't think Amazon Go and Amazon Fresh are the same thing. You sure about this one?
bxl-forever (2022-08-27 10:02:44+00:00): Hello, 0xc4,

You were the fastest to upload the map, congrats.

Just one thing: when you add "oneway=yes" to a street, the restriction automatically applies to every mode of transport… and also cyclists.  This breaks cycle routing.
I added "oneway:bicycle=no" which is what we do when cyclists are legally allowed to use a one-way street in both directions.

Happy mapping.
0xc4 (2022-08-27 10:15:04+00:00): Hi ! Thank you for this useful precision :)

I thought that having cycleway:lane (lanes on both sides) was enough for bikes to be allowed on each direction. I'll do better next time.

Thank you for your very effective monitoring and frenetic mapping <3
oba510 (2022-08-28 07:50:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8042605/history doesn't look like an allotment at all.  I'm not sure what the best way to tag a building courtyard would be though.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338429760/history doesn't look right.  A building podium is part of the building and should normally be tagged as building:part=* (or building=*).

Why was Lee's Deli ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1281158248/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4468299590/history ) changed to a fast food chicken chain?  The two chains don't appear to have any connection other than a similar name as far as I can tell.

Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/775379090/history really a Starbucks again?  There used to be a Starbucks here but that was before the hotel was renovated and it was replaced by Radiator.
user4816003805 (2022-09-03 03:00:49+00:00): I passed by Lee's Deli (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4468299590/history) earlier today. It's definitely not a chain that sells chicken, it sells dim sum and other Chinese food. You can see some pictures I took in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3343088.

Would you mind fixing this error and the others mentioned by oba510?
user4816003805 (2022-09-05 17:55:50+00:00): Dogman15 mostly fixed Lee's Deli in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125724010.

I've fixed the other errors mentioned here in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125757505.

Thanks again, Dogman15, for resolving some of my fixmes (https://osm.org/node/9968860003/history)!
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
CoyKoi (2022-08-26 10:17:34+00:00): Oops it looks like I deleted more turnlane relations than I intended. I will work to rectify these.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125395707
eggie (2022-08-26 15:53:40+00:00): Hoi... . Dat zijn allemaal van de grijze situaties.
De regel in OSM..
Staat er een bord fietspad dan cycleway
Staat er een G7 bord en/of auidelijk alleen voor wandelaars dan footway

Staat er niets dan highway=path
surface=paving_stones

Het zal dan ook voor fietsers routeren.

In de praktijk zal er gewoon worden gefietst en het is nog toegestaan ook.
Nu met wandelpad routeert het niet meer voor fietsers..
Wellicht moet dat stik naar de brug ook wel worden omgetagd naar highway=path surface=....
Welk bord staat daar?

In English

traffic_sign G7  tag highway=footway

no sign .. tag highway=path surface=paved 

Greetz,
eggie



Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-08-26 23:44:13+00:00): Anyway.. It's a footway.. Local mapper told me  .. traffic_sign NL:G7

Greetz,
eggie