piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2022-08-07 11:42:00+00:00): Absent your urgent response, this erroneous change immediately affected vehicle routing, made the change in CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124593459
If you tell me where the signs of 1.9 meters and 1.8 are we can revisit.
Be careful with adding traffic affecting entries in StreetComplete, be absolutely sure, enter data while surveying on site.

cheers

In assenza della tua risposta urgente, questa modifica errata ha immediatamente influito sul percorso del veicolo, ha apportato la modifica in CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124593459
Se mi dici dove sono i segni di 1,9 metri e 1,8 possiamo rivisitare.
Fai attenzione con l'aggiunta di voci che influiscono sul traffico in StreetComplete, assicurati di inserire i dati durante il rilevamento in loco.

Saluti
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
abakus_uploader (2022-08-06 22:32:47+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Austrianton (2022-08-12 17:56:33+00:00): Please keep single change-sets local if possible, to avoid spamming the history feed over large areas.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Thanks and happy mapping
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124567580 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124567580 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
Olivier Lafont (2022-08-12 16:00:56+00:00): Bloc de caméra de vidéo protection communales.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124567580 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124567580 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
PT-53 (2022-08-30 05:26:30+00:00): Hallo Chriss999,
Du hast an diesem POI-Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9806679890/history
das Merkmal
- note=*
gelöscht und das Merkmal
- opening_hours=*
ergänzt.

Wenn das Cafe in Betrieb ist könnte doch das Merkmal
- construction=yes
jetzt gelöscht werden, oder?

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Kays (2024-12-04 14:55:59+00:00): Meanwhile there is a banner reading “New Kaulfand coming soon”.

Should/Do we add this, or is this _too_ _vague_ of information? I mean, it isn’t really observable on the ground.
jengelh (2024-12-04 17:01:27+00:00): hm? it's already set: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121082438#map=19/51.560905/9.927240
Kays (2024-12-04 17:14:26+00:00): Whoops, I must’ve inspected the construction _area_ (way 1059037039), not the building.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124567580 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124567580 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-08 14:33:49+00:00): todas tus ediciones han sido eliminadas. son puntos personales con nombres de personas, no de empresas.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124567580 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
chkr (2022-08-06 16:54:52+00:00): Moin,

welche Quelle hast du genutzt, um die Fläche des geplanten LNG Terminals zu erfassen?

Gruss Christian
map per (2022-08-06 19:59:36+00:00): Ich hab die Infos von der Projektwebseite (https://germanlng.com/ausstattung-des-terminals-und-kennzahlen/?lang=de)

Viele Grüße
map per
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
PT-53 (2023-01-03 08:36:37+00:00): Hallo Lynx87 ,
Du hast an diesem - gesamten - Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707656878/history
das Merkmal
- layer=-1
ergänzt. Das ist so nicht korrekt.
Wolltest Du eventuell nur den unter dem Dach verlaufenden Teil-Abschnitt damit versehen?
Dazu müßte die Straße aber entspr. aufgetrennt werden und statt
- layer=-1
sollte das Merkmal
covered=yes
verwendet werden.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:covered

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße und noch ein
Gutes Neues Jahr

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Lynx87 (2023-01-04 19:00:01+00:00): Vielen Dank für Deinen ausführlichen Kommentar. Ich werde eine entsprechende Änderung versuchen.
Beste Grüsse!
PT-53 (2023-01-29 08:27:21+00:00): Hallo Lynx87 , 
ich habe - als Muster - den überdachten Abschnitt noch entspr. aufgetrennt, mit dem Dach "verbunden" und mit dem Merkmal
covered=yes
versehen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136123066/history


Du könntest das jetzt noch bei dieser Zufahrt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084252287/history
so machen. Oder soll ich das tun?
Grüße
Lynx87 (2023-01-29 10:01:35+00:00): Auf der zweiten Bahn habe ich das auch noch entsprechend ergänzt.
Gruss
PT-53 (2023-01-29 11:29:42+00:00): Ich habe noch den überdachten Straßenabschnitt an den Schnittstellen mit dem Dach verbunden (gemeinsamer Knoten für Straßenabschnitt und Dach)
-https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10591328338/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10591328339/history
Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
riiga (2022-08-06 16:05:50+00:00): Hej!

Har rastplatsen försvunnit eller varför har du raderat den informationen?

Du får gärna också se till att fylla i kort sammanfattning av vad du ändrar, borde finnas ett textfält för det precis innan du laddar upp ändringarna.
archie (2022-08-07 18:05:55+00:00): May I remind you of an answer to the question.
Please do comment your changeset.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-15 18:53:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124941507 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6246
marczoutendijk (2022-08-06 18:18:18+00:00): Highways sshould read Landuse!
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124567580 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
mueschel (2022-08-07 08:30:10+00:00): Hi,
the tag "generator:solar:tracking" is not used in any other place. The common tag used is "solar:tracking" - used >2000 times already. Could you check that?
Hidoo00 (2022-08-07 08:34:00+00:00): Oh absolutely. Didn't find a tag so I went with ATYL, but solar:tracking is obviously superior, then. Feel free to fix them, or I will do it in a few days!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124567580 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-08-07 07:53:30+00:00): Thanks for adding this runway, there was however no need to add it twice; I took the liberty to remove the double. Have you any idea what kind of flying happens here?
Arnebius (2022-08-07 15:27:07+00:00): This runway only supports light aircraft.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-08 14:33:05+00:00): todas tus ediciones han sido eliminadas. son puntos personales con nombres de personas, no de empresas.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-15 18:53:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124941507 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6246
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
grinapo (2022-08-06 20:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124576751.
DaveF (2022-08-07 12:52:57+00:00): Hamworthy Train Station railway station already exists.
hanchao (2022-08-08 03:06:42+00:00): 这里的精度不高，意义不大，我先删除了
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
grinapo (2022-08-06 20:17:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124576751.
grinapo (2022-08-06 20:17:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124576751.
grinapo (2022-08-06 20:17:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124576751.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
grinapo (2022-08-06 20:16:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124576751.
grinapo (2022-08-06 20:16:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124576751.
grinapo (2022-08-06 20:15:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124576751.
eggie (2022-08-07 22:08:05+00:00): Dit is weer okay zo..
Je zou die parkeermogelijkheden kunnen uitbreiden met
amenity=parking .. parking=street_side
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-06 15:35:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124564450, 124564571, 124564720, 124564813, 124564911, 124564989, 124565090, 124565181, 124565269, 124565343, 124565433, 124565513, 124565605, 124565738, 124565829, 124565937, 124566024, 124566118, 124566250, 124566363, 124566476.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
user_5359 (2022-08-07 14:40:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1084264296 (one of 73 objects). What is the meaning of the tag 
oddr:inclusion = actual
oddr:interpolation = odd
? did you mean the prefix addr instead of oddr?
user_5359 (2022-08-11 06:15:25+00:00): Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22oddr.inclusion%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22oddr.inclusion%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22oddr.inclusion%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=-36.70446;-56.67846;17&R
You miss two ways.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
i2004 (2022-08-06 18:03:10+00:00): te aclaro que el 39,46,53 van por hornos hasta caseros  ya no van mas por Brasil hasta Tacuarí
AgusQui (2022-08-09 20:18:17+00:00): Bueno.
archie (2022-08-06 16:20:26+00:00): Why did you do this? The part of the building is now on the wrong place. You have to adjust your backgroundpicture (Bing in this case) to get rid of the image-offset. 
Please do as described in the wiki BEFORE you edit anything (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery).
marco dambrogio (2022-08-07 21:14:06+00:00): Im sorry i just started contributing. Have a nice day.
eggie (2022-08-06 16:39:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-06 16:42:52+00:00): Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode
gr eggie
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 16:18:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124569216 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in PA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6205
DeFra85 (2022-11-07 09:11:34+00:00): Hej, schau dir doch mal bitte diese Diskussion an, die deine Ergänzungen glaube ich betrifft: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=76406
DeFra85 (2022-11-07 09:15:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9935834901 scheint zum Beispiel falsch zu sein, da dieser schon weiter südöstlich im Teute am Dortmund-Ems-Kanal eingetragen ist und zweitens hier überhaupt gar keine Erhebung gibt
Glitch-Hunter (2022-11-07 09:56:16+00:00): Auf dem NRW Kartasta Layer ist dieser als örtlichkeit zu sehen
Glitch-Hunter (2022-11-07 09:57:03+00:00): Bzw als Flur name
DeFra85 (2022-11-07 10:51:11+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/vorsicht-bei-ubernahme-von-informationen-aus-der-preussischen-landesaufnahme/3029?u=tobwen
DeFra85 (2022-11-07 10:52:46+00:00): nur blöd wenn die aus dem Katasteramt sich auch nur an den alten preusischen Karten bedienen und Fehler kopieren
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 16:18:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124569216 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in PA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6205
TuAmigoElEditor (2022-08-06 16:24:26+00:00): Hola veo que has puesto la etiqueta de highway=tertiary a varias vias que dificilmente considero aptas para tener esa etiqueta. Por ejemplo la calle coronel vidal, calle augusto B. Leguia, calle perez gamboa, calle Mariano Prado, entre otras. Espero que no sigas poniendo esta etiqueta a varias calles pequeñas.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-06 18:13:30+00:00): Ok disculpa si hubo algún error, acabo de terminar de agregar y agregar superficies y clasificaciones en la región de Tacna. Si ve algo, corríjalo, creo que la mayor parte es correcta, faltaban muchas carreteras en esta región. Usé la capa de Strava y mapithAI en esta región.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 16:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124569216 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in PA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6205
Aleks-Berlin (2022-08-07 07:59:57+00:00): Hi clementader, please follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
wikipedia="fr:Abcd", not ="http.."
Thanks, Alex
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 16:18:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124568648, 124568827, 124568998, 124569066, 124569084.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-08-08 07:50:56+00:00): Moin DCA,
bitte "Südkampen" nicht als Straßenname  (addr:street) sondern als Ortsname (addr:place) angeben. StreeComplete kann das auch: "Weitere Antworten" --> "Zu keiner mit Namen"
Viele Grüße
DCA (2022-08-08 07:57:09+00:00): ... meine Verwandschaft wohnt da. Die Adressen der Dörfer der Umgebung schreibt man im Straßennamen mit dem Dorfnamen (plus Hausnummer), wogegen der Ortsname hier Walsrode ist. So würde man das auf einer Postkarte tun.
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-08-08 10:56:47+00:00): Das weiß ich doch.  :-) Aber in OSM erfassen wir das trotzdem mit addr:place statt addr:street. Immer wenn die Straßen keine eigenen Straßennamen haben und in der Anschrift der Orstname + Hausnummer verwendet wird.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:place
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-08-08 11:01:22+00:00): Beispiel:

addr:place=Südkampen
addr:housenumber=101
addr:postcode=29664
addr:city=Walsrode
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-19 16:24:40+00:00): Telefonnumre skal have landekoden med, dvs typisk +45 i Danmark
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-19 16:25:02+00:00): og der kan kun være eet nummer i phone tagget
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
user_2066394 (2022-08-07 09:47:10+00:00): Position mitten auf der Straße passt?
HannesV (2022-08-07 15:41:50+00:00): Die Straße wird dort durch 3 Rotweine Stempen zu 2 Sackgassen (für PKW). Eine durchfahrt ist dort für PKW nicht möglich.
user_2066394 (2022-08-07 15:47:23+00:00): Die Erläuterung im Changeset-Kommentar wäre ein Traum gewesen :-)
silversurfer83 (2022-08-07 13:06:19+00:00): Hallo Christoph,
erstmal Willkommen bei OSM :)
Ich sehe gerade, dass du bei einigen Änderungen um Review durch Andere gebeten hast. Das möchte ich nun tun:
Änderung von Track auf Path: Ist OK, wenn da wirklich keine Kraftfahrzeuge mehr durch kommen. Eine andere Möglichkeit den Track entsprechend zu bewerten bietet smoothness: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness

Der gelöschte path: Wenn vor Ort wirklich nichts mehr auf einen (Trampel)Pfad hinweist, dann ist das in Ordnung. 

Weiter viel Spaß, und schön, dass weitere Nutzer hier in der Gegend mithelfen
-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124569994
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
eggie (2022-08-07 22:10:54+00:00): wag  Het gebied van je edits is veel en veel te groot. Beperk je tot een wijkje zoals een deel van de Stadspolders.
.... en schuiven geeft vaak schade.. 
Dus volgende keer dit in twee aparte changesets
eggie
eggie (2022-08-06 17:30:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
eggie (2022-08-06 17:35:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip.. Stukjes gras binnen de bebouwde kom die onderhouden worden taggen we met landuse=grass
Parkeervakken langs de weg taggen we met
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
parking:orientation=perpendicular  in dit geval.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Daymian (2022-08-06 17:39:03+00:00): Bedankt voor de tips!
eggie (2022-08-06 17:43:04+00:00): Als voorbeeld even wat aangepast.
street_side parkeerplaatsen (dus geen parkeerterrein)  zie je minder prominent op de kaart. Je krijgt anders een wijk vol P's. 
Veel plezier met mappen,
eggie
eggie (2022-08-06 17:47:49+00:00): Hier nog voorbeelden in de buurt van street_side parkeermogelijkheden
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.04604/5.63426
giggls (2024-06-25 12:55:55+00:00): Did this campsite actually exist back then?
I have been there at 31.5. and it did not look like it still existed. However there was a road sign still pointing to it. Maybe it reopened at 1.6. but I doubt this.
flohoff (2024-06-25 19:22:48+00:00): Yep - we stayed there with 2 Campers. Yes - it does not look like a campsite from the outside - more like a lost place - but one can stay there and they have everything one needs. At least in 2022
giggls (2024-06-25 19:25:09+00:00): Hm we did not even find an entrance.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076