piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
attili1 (2021-12-06 09:16:53+00:00): Hi Muhammad Murtadha,

Trust you are doing well and welcome to OpenStreetMap. While mapping in Indonesia we observed that you have added a lot of building polygons which does not seem to reflect on the ground reality and should be avoided mapping on OpenStreetMap. We are reverting these changesets and please do not hesitate to reach out to us for any questions.

We know it’s often scary for a beginner to map in OSM, please visit the OSM beginner’s guide/learnOSM to learn best mapping practices. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide , https://learnosm.org/ or reach out to us for more questions. 

Happy Mapping!
Manoj
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114449515
Владимир К (2021-12-30 11:53:43+00:00): Добрый день!
Пожалуйста, используйте более информативные комментарии к правкам.

Так же следует придерживаться соглашения о статусах дорог
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
SHARCRASH (2021-12-02 19:08:48+00:00): Hello! Why the access=no?
alxGS (2021-12-03 08:45:06+00:00): i think your changeset(s) messed up the multipolygon.
can you look into fixing that?
PacerCZ (2021-12-03 08:48:30+00:00): yes, ist seems so. I will fix that. Thanx for the info
eggie (2021-12-01 17:41:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2021-12-03 10:23:13+00:00): Hi,
the 'service:bicycle:...' tags you used are not used in other places. 
Please check them and change them to common tags.
Note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English, e.g. sales, repair, service...
PedroDGarcia (2021-12-03 11:42:25+00:00): Ok, thanks
Cafetom (2021-12-01 22:17:53+00:00): Hola Juan, la etiqueta highway=living_street no se debe usar para carreteras en Colombia, esto está en la guía de mapeo de Colombia.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear
juan_earistizabal (2021-12-01 22:28:17+00:00): Gracias por la información; realmente llevo editando el mapa de Manizales hace algunos meses y no conocía esta guía. La revisaré para mis próximas ediciones. Gracias nuevamente.
Cafetom (2021-12-01 22:30:32+00:00): Super! Bienvenido
user_12500175 (2021-12-02 10:33:33+00:00): Hallo, Kindegärten am besten als Kindergartengelände,-gebäude mappen. Siehe z.B hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/new#map=19/48.27963/10.96963&layers=N
ottwiz (2021-12-01 20:28:03+00:00): Na látom sikerült mégis csak megcsinálni a templom 3D modelljét. :) Szép munka
Dino Michelini (2021-12-03 14:59:03+00:00): La relazione Via Francigena (13496976) percorso CAI 100 non è il percorsfo ufficiale della Via Francigena (https://www.viefrancigene.org/it/). SI prega di cancellare il name=Via Francigena dalla relazione 13496976 e adeguarsi al percorso ufficiale.
Glassman (2021-12-02 20:17:34+00:00): It looks like you changed the supermarket to a pharmacy yet the is another pharmacy in the supermarket. Last time I drove by it was a Albertsons. Has it changed to safeway? The are both owned by Safeway but the name should reflect what's on the building. Can you review this edit and fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114451925
red_maple88 (2021-12-05 17:11:48+00:00): Thanks for catching my mistake. I used the app Street-Complete for the edit and thought I was editing the pharmacy. The building is a Safeway now with a Safeway Pharmacy counter inside. They did a big renovation a few months ago when they switched from Albertsons. There is even a few electric vehicle charging spots in the parking lot now which I will try to figure out how to add to the map.
Glassman (2021-12-05 21:58:17+00:00): Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station for how to map charging stations. I haven't been but need to start. FYI - Tesla owners have been mapping parking lots for the ability to have the car autonomously move from the parking space to the owner's location. Although I haven't seen that in a while.
pbnoxious (2021-12-01 17:58:42+00:00): Hi, danke für die vielen Ergänzungen für Fußgänger. Mir ist hier eine Merkwürdigkeit bei den Änderungen aufgefallen, vermutlich kommt sie aus einem Preset des Editors: 

Hier wurden einige Fußgängerampeln von "highway=crossing" zu "highway=traffic_lights" geändert.
Die von dir neu eingetragene Variante ist dazu da um zu einem Fußgängerüberweg gehörige Ampeln als extra Nodes neben dem Übergang einzutragen.
Bei denen die mir aufgefallen sind (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4517621891 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3337664612 aber sind noch mehr) ist damit jetzt quasi nur noch die Ampel eingetragen, aber der zugehörige Überweg fehlt.

Also bitte entweder noch den Überweg extra eintragen, oder wieder in "highway=crossing" mit "crossing=	traffic_signals" zurück ändern.

Weiterhin frohes eintragen
Tolhuis (2025-01-23 14:56:46+00:00): Wat zorgt ervoor dat deze straat een woonerf met snelheidslimiet 5 km/h is? Ik betwijfel dat dit een woonerf is, maar kan geen beelden vinden. Als het toch een woonerf is, is de maximale snelheid normaal 20 km/h.
MarcelDuchamps (2025-01-23 15:53:20+00:00): Dit past in het project Scheldekop. Het project is geen woonerf maar voetgangerszone met de nodige uitzonderlijke toegang van voertuigen met toelating. Dit deel vannhet project zal zeer binnenkort klaar zijn, waarna ook de nodige signalisatie aangepakt wordt. Logisch dat er nog niet zo'n recente beelden van zijn. In elk geval is de snelheid daardoor max 5 per uur. Daarom moet binnenkort dit deel ook nog verbetert worden Eens de realisatie volledig afgewerkt is.
Tolhuis (2025-01-24 13:28:55+00:00): Bedankt voor de snelle reactie. Wordt vervolgd dus. Ik heb alvast de BE:5 van maxspeed naar source:maxspeed verhuisd en maxspeed aangevuld met de snelheid (5).
nmombo12 (2021-12-17 15:35:36+00:00): Hello jpotas,
Does this golf course still exist at the time of editing? From what I can see in aerial imagery the land has been redeveloped as residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114452743
nmombo12 (2021-12-19 21:28:53+00:00): Thanks for the updates jpotas.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115068490
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115068563
4004 (2021-12-04 23:58:33+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
вы уверены, что европочта заехала именно на место 7 пятниц?
G_P_J (2021-12-02 08:59:08+00:00): Cześć, 

czy był jakiś szczególny powód skasowania tej drogi? Jest widoczna na ortofotomapie i stanowiła dojazd do zabudowań: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297336992/history

Pozdrawiam,
Piotr
painkill (2021-12-02 19:08:32+00:00): Czy był, nie pamiętam może skasowałem i nie dorysowałem nowego śladu. Bo jeśli dobrze pamiętam droga track była wyrysowana inaczej  (niż teraz przez Ciebie) i dalej w stronę nr 422. Ciekawe ze dość szybko to wyłapałeś
Luzandro (2024-07-24 05:54:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4346590
highflyer74 (2021-12-02 06:53:04+00:00): Hello!

Two little issues with this changeset:

- please do not set a name if the feature does not have a name. Don't use name to describe things (e.g. "Camping car Park"). 

- please keep your changesets more local. This one is spanning across Europe and it is hard for people to review.

Please read this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice to learn more about how we do things in OSM.

Thank you!
highflyer74 (2021-12-02 21:14:47+00:00): After reviewing this CS further, I decided to revert it. Reasons:

- multiple POIs were already correctly mapped, thus resulting in double mappings

- wrong usage of naming (see above)

- poor usage of upper and lower case letters

- using wrong language in description=* (please use either local language, or use the localized description:xx=* for other languages).

If you need help on how to improve mapping, just let me know or be so kind to contact your local OSM community (https://openstreetmap.community/).
marczoutendijk (2021-12-01 18:24:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 57759430.
woodpeck (2023-11-14 09:47:19+00:00): Hallo, hast Du in Deinen Unterlagen (oder der Erinnerung) vielleicht noch Details zu diesem Weg, den Du eingetragen hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008174425/history -- auf dem Luftbild kann man nur Teile des Wegs erkennen, andere scheinen quer über eine Wiese zu gehen und wir haben eine Beschwerde des Grundstücksbesitzers von dort, wo der Weg im Norden in die Straße einmündet - da sei kein Weg, sondern sein privater Garten... (DWG Ticket#2023111410000098)
jeroenrozema74 (2023-11-17 21:07:50+00:00): Hallo,

Ich versuche es auf deutsch:
Damals war dort einen Wanderweg (teilweise über die Wiese) aber seitdem wurden dort auch einige neue Häuser gebaut, glaube ich. Ich kann leider nicht beurteilen, wie die aktuelle Situation ist. Bitte ändere es nach ihrem Wunsch....

Grüße,
jeroenrozema74
smaprs (2021-12-05 20:26:53+00:00): Hi, this relation that represents wetlands has been broken  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363566534/history  
The log says you were the last user to edit recently.  
Please verify, tnx.
smaprs (2021-12-05 20:34:19+00:00): Sorry, now it seems fine, I think it was about the time for tiles to render green as wetland, it looked blank before.
eggie (2021-12-01 19:35:44+00:00): Please don't look at the roofs. 
All buildings are import in the Netherlands. They are at the right position. 
I restored the buildings.
Greetz,
eggie
wobi9000 (2021-12-01 20:04:16+00:00): ok, sorry I did not know that. thanks for the hint.
eggie (2021-12-01 20:22:39+00:00): No problem..  :)
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-12-01 19:14:12+00:00): Hi woni..
Please use a more recent picture like pdok actueel
No buildings here.
All buildings in the Netherlands are import from the Dutch Kadaster.
Bing is outdated.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-12-01 19:16:27+00:00): Hav a look here
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=01-12-2020&loc=52.39890%2C6.811641%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-09-28&acqid=20210928_112927_SV1-02&sensor=SuperView-1
sept 2021
greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-12-01 19:32:06+00:00): Removed demolished buildings
Luci Roses (2021-12-06 07:06:31+00:00): Hi,
eggie (2021-12-01 19:20:23+00:00): Hi.. It's not a building but a separate building=roof layer=1
gr eggie
wobi9000 (2021-12-01 20:02:12+00:00): Hey, ok thanks for the suggestion. I changed it.
Lee Carré (2021-12-04 19:35:45+00:00): I'm not disputing the change, but am curious about the problem that was being caused (in order to avoid similar in future).
Aleks-Berlin (2021-12-05 11:59:19+00:00): Hi Lee C., at least this key was listed as being a problem, here
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys#problem
Kind regards, Alexander
Lee Carré (2021-12-06 17:38:41+00:00): Interesting. I presume because of the “+” character.

Note, though, that at the URL you cite are the following phrases:
▪︎“possibly problematic”
▪︎“can be problematic, because they […] have special meanings in […] URLs” (yet, this is what &…; escaping is for)
▪︎“Keys that appear in this list are not necessarily wrong though.”

I took inspiration for the syntax from
▪︎http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Date_namespace
▪︎http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Date_specification

As per the value of the key, it's time-sensitive (and given the limited contributions which Jersey receives, it may be a long time until the element is next edited), so the suffix seemed wise (if only to avoid future confusion / ambiguity, especially once construction is long finished). The + was because it applied beyond the month specified, but with an unknown end-date (thus a strict range wasn't possible), so took inspiration from the opening_hours syntax for open-ended dates.

I gather that the whole idea of a date-suffix namespace is in order to have multiple keys of the otherwise same name, but for which there are temporal differences (think of name:[date] especially).

How would you propose the date constraints be specified, instead?

As an intermediate name for the key, to avoid a root-level note=* , might I suggest note:construction=* instead.
Aleks-Berlin (2021-12-06 17:45:38+00:00): Hi again, I like your suggestion. There is a another best-practice also satisfied by your choice: try to avoid unique keys.
Kind regards, Alexander
archpdx (2021-12-02 03:23:54+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for updating this area. I noticed you changed the name of https://www.osm.org/way/5492491 to BLM Rd 20-2-28 and was wondering if this is the signed name. If not, where did you get this name from?

Thanks,
archpdx
archpdx (2021-12-02 03:26:53+00:00): Also I noticed that https://www.osm.org/way/1008183179 isn't connected to the road network and the 'marked crosswalk' node on one of the ends should probably be a type of barrier rather than a crosswalk, see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Barriers for more info
spoonlegs (2021-12-03 05:30:21+00:00): Thanks; I don't know how that crosswalk got in there!  I've now changed both endpoints to "bollards".  (They are actually 55 gallon drums, serving as bollards.)
 
 I am reluctant to connect the footpath to the roads, because I'm not trusting that people's GPS apps won't see that as a through street and route them that way (in trucks/cars).  We had another erroneous visitation today, from a big cherry-picker utility truck. Maybe you have a sense of how that would come through on an app?

I'm not sure what you mean by the road's "signed name"- - if you mean a physical road sign, yes, there is a BLM road sign saying "20-2-28" at its intersection with Cerro Gordo Rd (Ross Lane is part of BLM Rd 20-2-28), though the sign may be in poor condition by now.  This name is also listed on the legal description of all the land parcels that abut the road.  Cerro Gordo Rd is also known as BLM Rd 20-2-32.
archpdx (2021-12-03 06:10:01+00:00): Hi, thanks for your response. It's nice to see new mappers in Oregon! Routers shouldn't see it as a throughway as it's tagged as a footpath. Note that most providers update their maps every so often (usually monthly). Bikers/peds/horses might get routed through here without any access restrictions on the path though.

Yeah I meant if it had a road sign. We expand abbreviations in names (in this case Road instead of Rd) so I'll update this.
Vinber-Pro (2021-12-17 17:05:07+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,
le nom ne doit pas être utilisé pour l'espèce définissant l'arbre.

Je me permets de les retirer.

Si vous souhaitez renseigner l'espèce, vous devez utiliser de préférence species=*. Plus dinfo ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:species

Bonne cartographie
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-23 17:45:34+00:00): por favor, no fusione áreas con carreteras como lo hizo aquí. deben permanecer separados. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407452590/history
MVV44 (2022-12-25 19:09:51+00:00): Gracias erickdeoliveiraleal, me aseguraré de hacer esto correctamente en el futuro
G_P_J (2021-12-02 08:46:52+00:00): Cześć,
bardzo proszę, abyś nie zmieniał nazw ulic z istniejących na skrótowce. W OSM rozwijamy oficjalne skrótowce, dodajemy imiona do nazwisk. Oficjalne nazwy, jeśli są inaczej zapisane, niż w OSM możesz dodać z tagiem offcial_name= lub teryt_name=

Pozdrawiam,
Piotr
ivanbranco (2021-12-23 23:29:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614524517/history

Hi Stugeb,

the tag for buildings is building=yes (or another value), not place=building

also I don't see the point to having name=* and description=* with the same value.

Can you check it out please?
user_12887748 (2021-12-24 15:26:59+00:00): Thanks for the advice.
I used place instead of building because i thought it's only a building if it has a roof (I thought that's the case). I used "name" and "description" because i wasn't sure if it should be used as name or as description.
I'll remove the "description" tag and replace "place" with "building".
If you have a better idea please let me know it.
jtracey (2021-12-01 19:55:31+00:00): Thanks for the edits! For future reference, it's preferred if you add a source tag to your edits (in the default editor, iD, that's "Add field"->"sources" when you're saving). It's not big deal if you forget, but it helps things like figuring out how precise the newly mapped features are, and ensuring there's no copyright issues.
Seamer_the_mapper (2021-12-02 00:10:10+00:00): Thanks, will do.
ivanbranco (2021-12-02 16:05:43+00:00): Hi Minimalis,

what's the meaning of "hlasi_to_problem_kdyz_je_vyresen=yes"? OSM tags are by convention in english language
Minimalis (2021-12-03 05:58:06+00:00): Hi,
I don't know. It was already there. Maybe it's a warning from Id editor. I forgot to remove it.
haukep (2021-12-01 22:50:28+00:00): Hallo! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992923055 wurde gerade erst vor wenigen Monaten eingezeichnet und nun hiermit wieder gelöscht. Wie kommts?
haukep (2021-12-01 22:56:26+00:00): Ah, alles gut - habe selbst herausgefunden, dass das ein Duplikat von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992923071 war. :-)
impiaaa (2021-12-16 19:56:26+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115023031
TomCerts (2022-01-10 20:52:01+00:00): Olá Roteirizador,

Percebi que você adicionou uma tag 'oneway=yes' ao pequeno segmento em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778560910. Existem restrições de acesso aqui? Outra tag poderia funcionar em vez disso?

Obrigada,
TomCerts
Anaximandre (2021-12-01 20:14:11+00:00): Fait en écoutant #Tropicamap
Patr1k_P (2022-02-13 15:07:50+00:00): neviem ci si to prehliadol, ale skaly tam uz boli zaznacene cca pred 7r

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3377636086
Stefan_Varga (2022-02-15 20:26:24+00:00): Hej máš pravdu. Ja som len tie skaly obkreslil ako plochy. Môžem to zrušiť ak to robí duplicitu.
Patr1k_P (2022-02-16 15:37:03+00:00): ano v tomto pripade to vymazat a nechat povodne lebo je to duplicita
Stefan_Varga (2022-02-16 20:47:30+00:00): Je to zrušene ;)
Joseph R P (2021-12-10 02:44:53+00:00): Trunk isn't necessarily exclusively for expressways. It's also for important and high speed roads that can serve a similar purpose, like US 6 from Spanish Fork to Helper. The Redwood Road corridor connecting the two UT 85 segments temporarily acts as the only way for cars to get to each segment. When the MVC corridor is built as the bypass around this section it then should be downgraded to primary. You can find this a lot around the US when a regular main street is the only way to get from expressway segment 1 to expressway segment 2. Sometimes a bypass is later on built around the town the surface street passes though and the bypass is tagged as trunk/motorway and the main street is tagged down to primary as it is no longer the only through road to get from segment 1 to segment 2. See the examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance#Trunk
TheConductor (2021-12-10 04:44:56+00:00): I appreciate your thoughts on this issue. We've discussed this topic several times before in other parts of the county and I acknowledge that you have taken time to learn and to make well meaning edits in OpenStreetMap. I'd also like to acknowledge that I am aware that the "trunk" classification is not exclusively reserved for expressways. I also understand your reasons for wanting to classify Redwood Road as "trunk" to connect what looks like two disconnected segments. 

From a purely cartographic perspective, you are absolutely correct that Redwood Road serves as a corridor that connects two segments but the difference here is that I live here and understand the general travel patterns of commuters. I also have a unique perspective because I live in Salt Lake County and have someone in my family that commutes each day to Saratoga Springs in Utah County. Interstate 15 is our major North-South corridor that 95%+ of those people who live in Salt Lake County but work in Utah County use to get to Saratoga Springs/Eagle Mountain. The same is true of people who live Saratoga Springs/Eagle Mountain and work in Salt Lake County. The vast majority of commuters use MVC at 2100 North to access Interstate 15 to then go north to places of work in Salt Lake County. The people who work in Lehi, Orem, or Provo also use 2100 North or Pioneer Crossing to access Interstate 15  to then go north or south to access final destinations and/or places of work. While Redwood Road looks like a higher speed road that connects two expressways, the reality is that speed limit is 45 MPH and it only serves as an access point to the neighborhoods and businesses that are directly adjacent to it. Interstate 15 is the significantly quicker option when it comes to North-South commuting. 

I hope this explanation helped explain my reasoning for reverting the classification to "primary".
Joseph R P (2021-12-10 17:15:43+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. Just a correction though, the speed of UT 68 from Porter Rockwell Boulevard to the other MVC segment is (at least mostly) 55 MPH. That was another reasoning of me upgrading the corridor.
joel56dt (2021-12-01 21:54:49+00:00): Nice details!

I recommend not combining buildings with multiple parts into a single shape. For example, if the building is a tower and pedestal design, it's best to draw these separately. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/717937440 , for example now appears as if the whole pedestal is 26 levels instead of just the tower portion.

Thanks,
Joel
Frans S (2021-12-02 09:11:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
In 1 occasion you included the yard of the building int your mapping.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114457920
dx125 (2021-12-02 11:48:49+00:00): review_requested	versehentlich angeklickt , alles gut ;-)
Frans S (2021-12-02 09:09:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114458132
fabiotofy (2021-12-02 07:04:39+00:00): Ciao, sulla biblioteca comunale non sono d'accordo. La posizione che hai assegnato è corretta ma l'indirizzo corretto è Via Dante Alighieri 2. Poi allora bisogna creare un punto ad-hoc per specificare l'indirizzo del comune: Largo monsignor Luigi Cicuttini nr.1. Che dici ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114458241
fabiotofy (2021-12-02 07:07:39+00:00): scusa, ho sbagliato.  Ho dato un occhio sul sito del Comune. E' giusto come hai inserito.
Glassman (2021-12-02 20:19:40+00:00): #TIP: We don't use descriptive names like Driveway Access. To tag it as a driveway, just add the tag service=driveway. Can you fix this? I'll send more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114458267