piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Harald Hartmann (2017-04-11 13:58:19+00:00): Hallo simsidii, darf man noch fragen, aus welcher Quelle du dann die addr:city geändert hast? Mir ist nämlich aufgefallen, dass du OSMSuspect als changeset:source genannt hast. Vor wenigen Tagen hat dann aber ein anderer User einen Teil deiner Änderungen auch auf Grund von OSMSuspect geändert.
Als ein Beispiel das hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321489323/history
Du hast von "Biberach (Baden)" in "Biberach/Baden" geändert, der andere User wieder zurück in "Biberach (Baden)"
Wir haben dazu (OSMSuspect) auch eine Diskussion im Forum, diesen Fall habe ich explizit in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=640505#p640505 genannt, der andere User hat sich dort ebenfalls gemeldet. Und nein, dass soll jetzt kein Angriff sein und du musst dich auch nicht rechtfertigen, es wäre aber schön zu wissen, um nachvollziehen zu können, warum das so gekommen ist, wie es kam.
Glassman (2017-03-02 01:32:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please only add features that can be verified. Temporary features, like a parked car, should not be added. Check out http://learnosm.org and wiki.openstreetmap.org for more information.
eggie (2017-03-01 22:56:23+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”
Tip...Probeer bij elke changeset aan te geven wat je precies gedaan hebt. 'grond wordt bebouwd". Is dat overal zo?
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Endres Pelka (2017-03-19 17:45:22+00:00): Znakowanych szlaków nie mapujemy w ten sposób, od tego są relacje!
_felicjan (2017-03-19 19:30:44+00:00): Dzięki za komentarz Jedrzej.. wycofam zmiany i zrobię tak jak sugerujesz. Pozdrawiam
Endres Pelka (2017-03-19 22:50:02+00:00): Dzięki za odpowiedź! Nie trzeba od razu wycofywać wszystkiego, można po kawałku zmieniać, byle nie zostawiać tego w takim stanie. O, jest nawet poradnik na OSM Wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Relation:route

Pozdrawiam, Jędrzej
drEss (2017-04-01 20:13:12+00:00): witam
Rozumiem że wprowadzone dane będą już zbędne po 07-04-2017 (trasa EDK Zielona - Pielgrzymkowa) w związku z tym dobrze by jednak było aby je pan po tym terminie usunął. (ewentualnie przerobił to na relację). Trasa pozostawiona w takiej formie jak w tej chwili utrudnia edycję i powoduje niepotrzebne zamieszanie
_felicjan (2017-04-02 21:45:57+00:00): @Jedrzej, @drEss- możecie sprawdzić czy teraz jest ok? Próbując usunąć trasę zrozumiałem w czym rzecz ;) przepraszam za kłopoty, pozdrawiam
drEss (2017-04-03 04:19:57+00:00): Ale to nie są żadne kłopoty.. też i po to tu jesteśmy żeby służyć sobie radą i pomocą w takich sytuacjach. W tej chwili nie mam jak sprawdzić ale na pewno będzie ok. Dzięki za reakcję i odpowiedź.
ps . Planowałem edycję w rejonie tej trasy i nie bardzo wiedziałem jak potraktować pana dane :-)
eggie (2017-07-28 10:27:39+00:00): Je hebt hier hele stukken van de landuse verwijderd. Het is al even geleden zie ik. Wat was je bedoeling hier? Graag reactie.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46503640
utack (2017-03-02 01:05:27+00:00): Bitte die 5 "monumente" aus maps.me nicht vergessen noch zu bereinigen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46503873
Constable (2017-03-05 18:34:38+00:00): stando alle immagini satellitari in questo punto ci sono degli alberi, non un benzinaio http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4712302589
Sposta questo nodo dove adesso c'è la Total e cancella il nodo della total!
grazie
eggie (2017-03-01 23:02:02+00:00): Fransco...Tip: Als het nog bouwstraten zijn kun je ze beter taggen als highway=construction
construction=residential
Jij weet het als lokale mapper denk ik als de beste. 't Ziet er wel goed uit verder.
eggie (2017-03-01 23:04:18+00:00): Je kunt ook forum van OSM bezoeken en jezelf voorstellen onder het draadje welkom.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MVG,
Eggie
joost schouppe (2017-04-30 19:18:29+00:00): Je n'ai pas trouvé [ce chemin](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393241273). Il devrais entrer dans un champs au vaches, mais il n'y a aucun indication que c'est permit...
Mercator 1958 (2017-04-30 20:09:13+00:00): Hello Joost,

Ce chemin est repris sur l'atlas des chemins public - Falaen, chemin vicinal n° 9. J'ai emprunté ce chemin plusieurs fois. C'est à 1 km de chez moi. 

Mais effectivement, il n'y a pas d'indication venant du nord que le passage est public. C'est souvent le cas hélas. Si tu traverses la prairie - il y a souvent des vaches en été - en suivant la trace, tu trouves une petite barrière pour rentrer dans le bois et continuer. 

C'est une bonne idée d'avoir ajouté la barrière, je vais tagger la partie dans la prairie avec "trail_visibility=no"
joost schouppe (2017-05-02 06:46:56+00:00): Ah super, je n'ai pas osé avec le chien, mais bien le savoir. J'ai supprimé le fixme tag que j'avais mis. Tu pourrait aussi metre un tag vicinal_ref=9 pour indique le fait que c'est un chemin vecenal. C'est documenté ici: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Slowroads
Mercator 1958 (2017-05-04 13:34:17+00:00): Thank you for the advise. Do you suggest to tag vicinal_ref=9 or vicinal_ref="Falaen Chemin 9" or may be =FAL_009 but I'm not sure of FAL for Falaen. 

I try to map as many as possible paths I see when walking but it's sometime difficult to know if the path is public or not. Also some paths exist but are clearly difficult and unfortunately, this is never rendered. However, more and more applications are using OSM data and people sometime assume that a path shown is good. I believe we strongly need an official classification like the sac_scale in Switzerland. Tracks are rendered according to tracktype. Why not something equivalent for paths, At least showing difficulty and visibility.
joost schouppe (2017-05-04 15:07:34+00:00): All the uses I've seen of vicinal_ref are just the number (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/vicinal_ref#values), I think the number has to be seen in a municipal context. Not sure.
As for trail detail, I share your frustration. And yes, sometimes it is tempting not to map a path because users won't realize what it is exactly (like I did in this case, actually :))
sac_scale is not very useful for Belgium, but trail_visibility is widely used. I feel we should just map what's there, and try to get the data users to build better tools.
Do feel free to join the discussion at talk-be@openstreetmap.org (you need to join the list to be able to post) to see if we can find some solutions...
gileri (2017-03-02 23:35:38+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM !

Les noms "génériques" ne sont pas nécessaire pour la plupart des objets sur OSM; pas besoin d'appeler une poubelle "poubelle" ou un parking "parking".

Cependant si le parking en question a un nom spécifique, par exemple "Parking Cerisiers", dans ce cas on peut mettre name="Cerisiers" ou name="Parking Cerisiers"
trigpoint (2017-03-02 20:17:18+00:00): Hi, not sure how closely you were looking here, but the smaller roundabout is clearly a mini-roundabout.
chris_debian (2017-03-03 09:32:49+00:00): Hi, trigpoint.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I've done some reading, and it seems that a mini-roundabout is frequently described as being a white painted circle, on the road, or a slightlyraised white bump, in the road. Having reexamined this roundabout, for it's construction and size, i'm reluctant to change my original markings. 

As by its very nature, OSM is open, if you feel strongly about changing this, then i'll understand if you do.

Thanks again, it's always good to have a second pair of eyes, checking things.

Cheers,

Chris.
trigpoint (2017-03-03 21:25:48+00:00): The definition of a mini-roundabout is not necessarily painted white, but it needs to be traversable. At least one in Oakengates is cobblestones.
This one is very definitely a mini-roundabout, and painted white, so I have corrected it.
eggie (2017-03-01 23:05:36+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-01 23:07:48+00:00): Maps.me is niet bedoeld voor persoonlijke notes. De changeset is teruggedraaid.
utack (2017-03-02 00:25:24+00:00): Da ist wohl beim Editieren was schiefgegangen:
"Motel One" ist nicht Teil der Hausnummer
Wenn ein Hotel noch nicht da ist bitte mit Maps.me als kkomplett neuen Ort eintragen.
In diesem Fall ist es aber bereits vorhanden.
Paul_012 (2020-03-13 05:26:30+00:00): Instead of adding an underpass, this edit added the -1 layer to the entire northeastern railway line. I've reverted the change; please re-add the underpass by splitting the way first.
trarbach (2020-03-14 09:27:46+00:00): thanks for the hint. I did not recognize that i tagged the complete railway line.
Now its fixed.
vlraymond (2017-10-22 16:11:18+00:00): Looks great!
eggie (2017-03-04 10:00:08+00:00): Nogmaals... Een park ligt los over de landuse grass. Dus je legt die landuse park er gewoon overheen. 
Het geeft geen pas om gewoon weer alles in parken over te zetten. 
Ook is het gewoonte om de eerste mapper (toevallig was ik dat) een bericht te sturen.
OSM is een samenwerkingsproject. 
Zet svp ook in je commentaar erbij wat je doet.
Ik zal dit park als voorbeeld voor je mappen. Dan heb je park en landuse. Dat zijn twee verschillende dingen.
Neem gerust contact met me op.
eggie (2017-03-04 10:32:06+00:00): Op de dijk loopt toch een pad en gedeeltelijk een track.... ? Waarom heb je het weggehaald? Ook als je er niet mag komen kan zo'n pad op de kaart. Je commentaar is -. Wat bedoel je daarmee?
eggie (2017-03-04 10:44:20+00:00): Ik heb het "pad" weer toegevoegd als highway=track. (landbouwgebruik) Er loopt hier ook een wandelroute.
eggie (2017-03-04 10:49:51+00:00): Hier heb ik de landuse teruggezet. Alles was "deleted". Waarom? Wanneer jij goede edits zet laten we die heus wel staan. OSM is een samenwerkingsproject.
Beginnersfouten worden je echt niet kwalijk genomen. Overleg wordt juist op prijs gesteld. Je bent welkom op het forum van OSM. Je kunt je daar voorstellen onder het draadje welkom. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
eggie (2017-03-04 10:24:56+00:00): SVP commentaar op het geen dat je verandert.
Dan weten andere (lokale) mappers wat je aan het doen bent. Realiseer je dat je goede edits van voorgaande mappers aan het verwijderen bent.
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:57:24+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment.
iandees (2017-03-01 22:31:41+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for your contribution. Please keep in mind that edits to OpenStreetMap are meant to represent things in the real world that you can verify. If you'd like to create a map to share with others, let me know and I can point you to some excellent tools.
Hjart (2017-03-02 08:04:36+00:00): Vær opmærksom på at bygninger mm kan gøres pænt retvinklede ved hjælp af genvejstasten 'S'
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:57:33+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment.
Hjart (2017-03-02 07:26:21+00:00): Du har her fejlagtigt omklassificeret en række skovveje mm til gangstier. Derfor ser jeg nødsaget til at rulle tilbage.
faronium (2017-08-09 00:47:47+00:00): I don't think these exist as differentiated trails any longer. Road is typically unmaintained in the winter so access is difficult. You would have to nordic ski to get to the nordic ski trails!
danbjoseph (2017-03-14 19:26:28+00:00): What prompted you to edit in this area? Did you add these features based only on Bing imagery? The imagery is outdated and these features no longer exist. O Street NW does in fact go all the way through between 1st and New Jersey. See on Mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YEUh7NiMkphTHDJOZEEq6g
RustProof Labs (2017-03-14 19:42:06+00:00): I don't know how I didn't notice crossing O Street NW there!  Shame on me.  Yes, that was solely from Bing, I think there was previously an imported point from TigerLINE and I converted that to the building outline.  

Sorry, I almost always stick to local areas I've surveyed but was looking for a change in scenery.  I'll wait to make any more changes in that area until I'm there in a couple months!

Any advice on how I can go about undoing my invalid changes?  I don't want to just leave that mess on someone else, and have never had this issue before.  Thanks!!
danbjoseph (2017-03-14 20:08:58+00:00): No problem. Thanks for the quick response. I went and pulled building footprints for Dunbar HS from DC GIS and updated the whole block based on that and local knowledge.
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:57:37+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment.
eggie (2017-03-01 23:12:26+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-01 23:17:44+00:00): Een kerk geef je aan met bv amenity=place_of_worship
religion=christian 
denomination=reformed

Is dit echt een kerk?
eggie (2017-03-01 23:26:07+00:00): Ik heb even aangepast
amenity=place_of_worship
religion=christian
denomination =katholiek-apostolisch
name-= algemene Kerk Groenekan
Nu zal de kerk als de rendering het weer doet als een kerk renderen. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.13912/5.16172&layers=H
eggie (2017-03-01 23:43:03+00:00): Op het forum van OSM kun je terecht voor evt. vragen. Je kunt je ook voorstellen onder het draadje "welkom". 
MVG,
Eggie
Carlos Martin Noriega (2017-03-04 05:48:21+00:00): Hay posibles errores en las ediciones que realizó. Ya que la carretera que conecta la localidad de Yotholín con Oxkutzcab NO debe ser de sentido único. Verifique la edición o se revertirá la edición.
Carlos Martin Noriega (2017-03-04 05:49:08+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477965136#map=15/20.3188/-89.4432&layers=N

Sentido incorrecto.
joakimfors (2017-03-02 11:04:54+00:00): Forgot to change source tag since last changeset. Actual source=Mapbox;Mapillary
eggie (2017-03-01 23:31:25+00:00): Deze tag access=no sluit dus alle vormen van verkeer uit, behalve paard en voetganger. Is dat de bedoeling?
eggie (2017-03-01 23:40:43+00:00): Dat is dat paadje langs het oude spoor. Dat zal best wel kloppen zo.
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:57:44+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment.
SomeoneElse (2017-08-22 08:05:04+00:00): Hello poschon,
What is the point of the "information=add" data that you have added to every node here?  What was the source of the import?  Was it discussed anywhere?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-08-22 08:06:30+00:00): @dieterdreist did you raise this anywhere else (one of the mailing lists, the DWG, etc.)?
dieterdreist (2017-08-22 08:47:40+00:00): IIRR this was discussed on talk-it and still IIRR approved post operam.
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:58:47+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-07-01 17:08:37+00:00): @dieterdreist - is it something that was reported to DWG?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-07-01 17:08:52+00:00): @poschon - what is the source of this data?
dieterdreist (2018-07-02 10:52:12+00:00): AFAIR it was confirmed retroactively by the Italian community that the import was OK (source was OK, it would have helped no one to revert it, it was agreed the information was sufficiently good for importing). https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
I had also written to active local contributors and the reply I got was that quality is ok.
Furthermore, there was an import of 2016: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Emilia_Romagna_import_numeri_civici_2016
but not exactly the same data (because those imported here are supposed to be in CC0 from the municipality).
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-07-02 17:11:57+00:00): Has anybody commented about "nformation=add" tag spammed over all this new addresses?

What is its purpose? It is hopelessly vague so useless as fixme and I am unable to guess what was the intended purpose here.
dieterdreist (2018-07-02 17:44:06+00:00): @mateusz I am not aware. I agree the tag does not seem to make a lot of sense.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-09-30 09:10:38+00:00): I received a private message from author that information=add was added tor technical reasons and that it can be removed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-23 14:09:03+00:00): Unnecessary information=add are now removed.
dieterdreist (2018-10-23 17:33:31+00:00): thank you
muralito (2017-03-02 03:26:25+00:00): iBichet
Para ser dados úteis, 80 deve estar em maxspeed = 80 não no nome.
santamariense (2017-03-02 05:03:14+00:00): O iBechet usou o App OSMAnd. Tava olhando se tem como adicionar tags especificas como a maxspeed. E tem... Quando for adicionar radar pelo app, vai em avançado/advanced e clica em adicionar tag. Daí adiciona maxspeed=80.
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:58:55+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:59:05+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
poschon (2017-03-04 20:54:58+00:00): I seems to be, I was to fast. Please give me the feedback over PN. What did I do wrong?
Poschon
poschon (2017-03-04 20:58:50+00:00): For the start:

The basis for the import was http://dati.emilia-romagna.it/dataset/numerazione-civica-del-territorio-comunale--50f328b0/resource/fa3d040e-d4ea-4cdd-85c7-a83294fbeab0

The licenc for all imported adresses is Creative Commons - CC0 1.0
poschon (2017-03-04 21:14:16+00:00): Check the datas:
I compared all the adresses between present in the openstreet and in the SET. After the import I checked all the adresses over http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ and corrected all doubel house numbers
poschon (2017-03-04 21:18:08+00:00): But now I see some of my adaptations of double house numbers are not present on official release. Positive think is: The server has all the corrections
poschon (2017-03-04 21:22:39+00:00): I prepared all the import to correct it. Every one can filter all house numbers for "Information = info". I have also the imported file on my computer and could send it to every one.
dieterdreist (2017-03-05 14:03:41+00:00): Hello Poschon, thank you for replying. The most important critique from the mailing list is that you didn't follow the import guidelines and didn't contact the local community, otherwise you would have learnt that there was already an established structure and guidelines  for importing this data: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Emilia_Romagna_import_numeri_civici_2016
The second point is the absence of any kind of conflation, leading to many duplicates
dieterdreist (2017-03-05 14:08:33+00:00): also you should use a dedicated account for imports, especially if you are uploading a lot of stuff like you did.
poschon (2017-03-05 21:44:26+00:00): Hallo Martin,

I see.

I will the same: A great map for the world.

Are you in the community "Emilia Romagna"?

At the moment all my try to change something on the map is not visible. It seems that my account works partially.

About the doubles address:
At the moment over osmose you will see 16 visible doubles addresses. Then there are also present invisible doubles addresses 51. Import has over 60000 addresses. You see the amount of doubles is not so big. This is a work for 30 minutes.

Before I decline my import:
I would like understand better, what the community will do. Could you translate me the planed workflow in English? And I need my account as one week before.

Sorry that I borrow you
Poschon
dieterdreist (2017-03-06 16:55:36+00:00): Hello Poschon, there is still some discussion on the italian ML as you might have seen. I have told them that you are wiling to solve the few duplicates and that I have the impression you have understood now that there are import guidelines that have to be respected. Although the data doesn't require legally attribution (cc0) it would still have made sense to provide it (so others can see where the data came from). There are some active mappers in the area, and they will be asked to make an assessment of the input data quality. If they come to the conclusion that the data quality is sufficient the data will likely not be reverted (but this is only my personal guess, not a community decision).
poschon (2017-03-06 21:00:01+00:00): Hallo Martin, 
Grazie for this feedback.
I did not get your formulation "Although the data doesn't require legally attribution (cc0) it would still have made sense to provide it (so others can see where the data came from)." 

What is exactly the requirement in this case about source?

Source = http://dati.emilia-romagna.it

Or

Source = http://dati.emilia-romagna.it Modena Numerazione civica (License CC-0)

Or

I should adapt the comment? For example: Source is http://dati.emilia-romagna.it/dataset/numerazione-civica-del-territorio-comunale--50f328b0/resource/fa3d040e-d4ea-4cdd-85c7-a83294fbeab0 License CC-0

Just to inform you: At the moment I live in Modena. Before I started the import I check a random set of addresses and their position. The position is not really exact with deviation of around 5 m.

Grazie
Poschon
poschon (2017-03-06 21:19:25+00:00): I stay in Modena for more as one year. I have big interest to increase the status of OSM in Modena.
poschon (2017-03-06 21:22:59+00:00): Sorry I miss understand you last comment.
poschon (2017-03-06 21:25:37+00:00): Then I will wait for the feedback. I follow the discussion in ML, but it is quite difficult to understand. The google translate help me a little.
poschon (2017-03-09 18:50:42+00:00): I see the first feedback about the quality:

1.	Some days ago I talked about invisible addresses. I mean the wrong format --> 2/A. At the moment there are 51 addresses with wrong format. There is no problem to solve it.

2.	Not existing houses: I can not imagen that one responsible/person for one city like Modena is able to check every address. In my experience this will be solved step by step. How you deal with such things in other imports?

Grazie
Poschon
dieterdreist (2017-03-15 11:05:45+00:00): Hello Poschon, there have only been neutral or positive reactions regarding the import (a revert will likely not happen). You can go on with fixing the few duplicates (my preferences would be in doubt to favor the non-import version of the duplicates). Thank you,
Martin
dieterdreist (2017-03-15 11:08:24+00:00): btw: why are you sure 2/A is the wrong format? It is a common housenumber scheme in italy. If search doesn't find this, we might have to improve the search.