piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pyram (2018-03-28 17:54:59+00:00): Ach, da sind noch welche übrig. In der Anfangsphase hatte ich nach einer Möglichkeit gesucht, um klarzustellen, dass ein Weg eben keinen Namen hat bzw. dass ein Weg zwar einen Namen hat, man das aber vor Ort nicht zur Orientierung nutzen kann.
Von name:sign=* bin ich mittlerweile abgekommen (gelegentlich zugunsten designated:name=official/no), weil man lernt ja immer dazu und das Schema wird durch name:de etc. bereits für die Sprachvarianten genutzt. Das hatte ich damals unterschätzt. Mittlerweile ist es auch gebräuchlich noname=yes zu nutzen.
punya_man (2019-03-05 07:49:18+00:00): """Hi Alex Rollin,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the""way 166666541,way 166666539,way 166666525"" classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to a residential area .

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."""
Lee Carré (2021-07-11 19:39:13+00:00): During a recent (2021-07-04) survey, I couldn't find this bakery at all. Where the node is positioned is the location of the tearoom (and has been for some years).

Did it exist, but has now gone? Was it intended to represent the tearoom itself?

I visited the website=* URL which now returns an HTTP 404.
Lee Carré (2021-07-11 19:50:03+00:00): I sent a PM to the original contributor, drawing his attention to this changeset discussion.

His profile shows that he's been inactive for several years, so may not reply. Maybe, though.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-08-03 20:27:27+00:00): Im Sinne von  „ground truth“ ist das keine Route, sondern eine Tour und ist damit eigentlich in einem Tourenportal besser aufgehoben, als in OSM. Führe jemanden an den Anfang der Tour und sage, er/sie soll die Variante 2 fahren. Das geht nicht, weil es vor Ort keine Beschilderung „2-Flüsse Tour Variante 2“ gibt.
Außerdem ist diese Tour redundant mit den Relationen: Relation 75384 (Hauptroute) und Relation 9861852 (Alternativ-Routen), sowie deren Zusammenfassung in der Master-Relation 9861853. Diese Struktur ist ein Abbild der bei den Verzweigungspunkten angebrachten Übersichtskarten, die eine Hauptroute, eine Abkürzung und eine Erweiterung zeigt.
Es wäre vernünftig, diese Relation zu löschen.
LG Robert
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-08-05 11:56:51+00:00): Nachtrag: hier die Übersichtskarte an den Verzweigungspunkten: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/7pgfdGxDOYCROx2YyxnVUw
Luzandro (2019-08-05 18:05:44+00:00): +1
Владимир К (2016-03-15 12:33:05+00:00): не нужно писать в название то, что можно обозначить тэгами.
Takuto (2015-01-28 08:01:27+00:00): Привет! Хочу уточнить - в данном пакете правок вы наименовали Огородный переулок. Можете сообщить источник наименования? По генплану г. Тарусы это Сиреневая улица, народные карты Яндекса с ними согласны. На гугле это Огородный переулок...
neo-plan (2015-01-28 15:19:42+00:00): Это очень давно было - я уже не помню. Ездил сам, была запись с видеорегистратора, бумажные карты какие-то покупал там в сувенирах. Гугль не перерисовывал, генплана у меня тоже не было. Если считаете что правка неверная - измените!
Sylvain M (2025-10-16 22:49:07+00:00): Salut @Mika_Gueret
Sauf erreur, c'est toi qui avait créé cet arbre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1782458961) dans OSM, à l'occasion de ce changeset.
Je viens de mettre à jour ses infos, d'après cette page web :
https://krapooarboricole.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/le-gros-chene-de-mauleon-deux-sevres/

Pour info, ce n'est pas un châtaignier, mais un chêne pédonculé 😉
Mika_Gueret (2025-10-17 06:44:30+00:00): Salut, bien vu, je suis passé devant toutes les semaines pendant des années, je le trouvais magnifique, j'ai même pas pris le temps de bien regarder son espèce !
Sylvain M (2025-10-17 08:26:05+00:00): Si tu vois d'autres arbres remarquables, n'hésites pas à les taguer avec "denotation=natural_monument" :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:denotation%3Dnatural_monument
A+
wolfbert (2026-06-20 07:29:16+00:00): Hallo, worum handelt es sich bei den BEG NA Objekten? Tlw. gibt es hier keine Gebäude, und jedenfalls keine Adressen. Könnte ev. mit anderen Tags (ref, object:*, layer etc.) abgebildet werden.
fs_LT (2026-07-28 13:40:33+00:00): Das sind die Schachtgebäude/Notausgänge der Unterinntal-Bahntrasse. "BEG" steht für die ehemalige "Brenner Eisenbahn GmbH" https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brenner_Eisenbahngesellschaft die damals die Zulaufstrecke gebaut hat.
Die Gebäude sind meist mit Schildern beschriftet, die ein ÖBB-Logo und die Info "Strecke 33001", "XY-Tunnel", "Notausgang NA X" und "km xx,yyy" enthalten.
wolfbert (2026-07-31 15:34:08+00:00): Danke für die Erläuterung. Ich bin wegen der addr:housename u.ä. darauf gestoßen und würde die gerne ersetzen, aber eigentlich müsste man da noch mehr tun (siehe oben, + emergency, ref_name o.ä.).
aharvey (2017-09-17 10:27:03+00:00): HI, I couldn't find this track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166821499 at all, no evidence on the ground of the track, do you think I can remove it?
jeka p (2016-06-26 11:38:18+00:00): Hallo Berni! warst du damals vor Ort? laut basemap.at wäre es Kustersbergstrasse. Langener Straße liegt viel höher.
Gruss,
Jeka
ToniE (2020-05-23 08:48:19+00:00): Servus seichter,

ich habe den WDR (Amrum, Föhr) in PTNA unter DE-SH-NAH.SH aufgenommen.

Viele Grüße
Toni

Ich sehe gerade Deine recht alten Edits bzgl. der Busse auf Föhr, die mittels Segmenten erstelle wurden.

Die würde ich gerne auf PTv2 umstellen. Spricht aus Deiner Sicht etwas dagegen?
seichter (2020-05-23 13:14:53+00:00): Zu der Zeit damals war mir nicht mal PTv1, höchstens Oxomoa bekannt.
Für die Richtigkeit der Routen kann ich auch keine Garantie übernehmen. Ich war auf Urlaub dort und habe naturgemäß den damaligen Stand übernommen.
Welches PT-Schema verwendet wird, ist mir relativ egal, wichtiger wäre mir, dass die Daten überprüft sind.
ToniE (2020-05-24 12:04:34+00:00): Alles klar, Korrektheit ist natürlich oberstes Gebot.
Lee Carré (2021-12-23 20:36:21+00:00): http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:source = ?

I surveyed http://www.osm.org/node/1783532818 (corner of Val Plaisant & Windsor Road) which was positioned inside the playground area (which seemed dubious). Yet, while a vaguely recall a phone box in that area (on the pavement outside), I couldn't find where it used to be (normally a conspicuous 3-foot square remains (resurfaced, or similar)) in order to position the node more accurately.

As you're the only mapper to make any changes to that node, before myself; any clues?
Lee Carré (2021-12-23 20:37:38+00:00): Even aerial imagery wasn't helpful; I did check.
OffTheChart (2022-01-04 12:40:19+00:00): The phone box is visible on StreetView in a recess in the playground wall. If it's no longer there, you've done the right thing to remove it.
Lee Carré (2022-01-04 14:33:57+00:00): “phone box is visible on StreetView in a recess in the playground wall”

So it is: http://www.google.com/maps/@49.1894226,-2.1050229,0a,75y,326.87h,89.48t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s2_YpXzpN4-NqopEny5WKLw!2e0 . I didn't even think to check what Google had.

I had a through look around; pretty sure it's now not where the photo shows it to have been.
Will resurvey, to be sure. The node position is incorrect, still.

“If it's no longer there, you've done the right thing to remove it.”

JT have (in the past couple years) not only decommissioned, but entirely removed a whole bunch of them, box and all (you'd think we'd follow the UK's example and reuse them to host defibrillators). I've been trying to survey the original sites to mark-as-removed the sacrificial ones, so that normies aren't misled when querying their app for the nearest phone.

While they're not easy to spot, this one was particularly mysterious & difficult.

Some do still exist, seemingly maintained, though.

JT's excuse seems to be the cost of upkeep, when usage is declining (because most everyone has their own portable phone, now). Yet, they set the price for local calls to be zero, and continue to price-hike on their other services (especially fibre). So, 🤷‍♂️.

Similar with the many post boxes which are no longer collected from. At least those still exist.

I'll get to them all, eventually.
Lee Carré (2022-01-11 10:19:31+00:00): Re http://www.osm.org/node/1783532818

It's definitely gone. Had a good look this morning. Seems that the surface may have been repaved, since, and bins now occupy the same location. No wonder I had trouble seeing the outline.

Repositioned the node, updated the tags. Just another 35 to go.
ts_kanth (2019-02-21 19:41:52+00:00): Hi PurpleMustang,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the nodes from node 1783969111 to node 1783969180 classified as 'Residental'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Unclassified'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
DaveF (2022-09-06 16:51:14+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4694412/history

Could you clarify what the 'physical' key represents?
rene78 (2016-07-23 18:11:14+00:00): Ohne Deine Hilfe hätte ich die Trinkwasserstelle am Place du Palais nicht gefunden. Danke!
Mashin (2020-09-22 01:52:38+00:00): I thought you would appreciate to know that the position and the shape of your 
Troll House from 2012 was finally fixed. :D
richlv (2020-09-23 11:03:20+00:00): Haha, that's wonderful - and you kept all the object history, that's one well done import :)

Thank you so much for the map improvements and this notice.
dieterdreist (2015-10-07 13:13:53+00:00): FrViPofm, can you tell me where this data comes from? Is it available only for France or also for other regions?
FrViPofm (2015-10-07 14:08:06+00:00): It comes from the website of the Strasbourg's diocese, and associated sites.
It's a long work to find information on parishes, gathering lists of communes, interpreting shapes on bad maps.
I have created ComComMaker at first to build those parishes from communes. And the tool appeared useful also for other purposes. 
Even if the bishop of Strasbourg is also a Franciscan Friar, I have no other way than searching the web. Sorry!
edvac (2018-08-06 11:20:51+00:00): This looks to be an import of UN-OCHA data. But I don't see any reference to that import being discussed with the OSM community. Imports have to follow the imports guidelines [1]. Have you followed those guidelines ?

Isso parece ser uma importação de dados do UN-OCHA. Mas não vejo nenhuma referência a essa importação sendo discutida com a comunidade OSM. As importações devem seguir as diretrizes de importação [1]. Você seguiu essas diretrizes?

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 13:48:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1785588849/history has ID = 0.0 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Pan (2025-05-02 15:25:00+00:00): Honestly, I can't remember but it does look weird indeed. Ir could be a copy and paste error or something like that. At the time, I was working there.
Mark Goedhart (2018-06-20 16:41:17+00:00): Supermarket is gone.
Almtesh (2018-08-20 13:07:17+00:00): Heureusement qu'elle est excellente, sinon, elle ne serait pas dans OSM…
Marc_ch (2023-11-03 10:53:52+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448967595
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167401432
quel est la source de l'opérateur ?
je doute que Alpiq opère une ligne situé entre 2 lignes SBB
Salutations,
Marc
Nzara (2023-11-03 17:37:44+00:00): Hallo Marc,

Leider kann ich mich nicht mehr an die Details des Changesets vor 11 Jahren erinnern. Ich vermute, ich habe die Information von einem Schild am Mast. 
Mir scheint operator=ALPIQ allerdings nicht ungewöhnlich in Verbindung mit frequency=50, voltage=220000. Weiter westlich verbindet sich die Leitung mit einer Leitung der SBB zu einer gemeinsamen Leitung. 

Beste Grüsse
orthocircular (2023-11-10 01:41:09+00:00): FYI this changeset had all of Salem Civic Center as bicycle=yes however "It shall be unlawful for any person to ride a bicycle in or upon the Salem Civic Center described in SRC 102.005. This section shall not apply to three-wheeled bicycles ridden by a handicapped or elderly person." I'm fixing.
Grant Humphries (2023-11-16 05:26:58+00:00): Sounds good.  I was working off a dataset that is either now out-of-date or was incorrect all along.  Also I live in the Portland area so don't know this area on the ground.  Thanks for fixing!
orthocircular (2023-11-16 07:05:23+00:00): Cheers! By the way I'm doing a bunch of work on Organic Maps (and addresses in Salem) and I notice that Portland has really good address coverage. If you'd like to collab a bit to make Organic Maps (and thus OSM) better for Willamettians, I'm happy to!
eggie (2018-11-06 06:55:28+00:00): Met flinke tussenpozen aan het mappen.., maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. daarom alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
aceman444 (2020-05-11 17:03:16+00:00): Zdravim, aky objekt ste tu chceli vyjadrit? Co je to 'ine' s nazvom 'Mojmirovce' ?
eggie (2018-12-15 20:06:30+00:00): Dag Maarten. Ik zag dat je na jaren weer een bijdrage levert aan OSM. Je hebt echter nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. Dus bij deze alsnog per PB.. wellicht heb je wat aan de nuttige tips en links..
MVG,
eggie
look4book (2018-08-05 19:28:43+00:00): Auf der Strasse gibt es bereits eine Ampel - was genau macht diese Ampel am Bach?
frosm (2024-09-12 07:57:03+00:00): Bonjour,
qui a le droit de pénétrer le porc en véhicule ?
apparemment la navette de vus.
mais est-ce que les habitants ont le droit ?
est-ce que les clients d’hôtel ont le droit ?
didier2020 (2024-09-12 09:44:55+00:00): bonjour, en 12 ans cela a pu changer....
SomeoneElse (2018-01-15 15:15:14+00:00): Hi,
Whilst trying to work out what had happened to the Magic I noticed "ref=(45)" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2235672/history - is that a legit ref (in a "leading to NCN 45" kind of way?
Best Regards,
Andy
Richard (2018-01-15 16:43:05+00:00): Pretty much - NCN 45 was originally 'braided' through Swindon with two possible routes; Sustrans has demoted one of them to a bracketed link route (as it has done in several places).
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 13:19:57+00:00): Hej, mam pytanie o przedpotową edycję

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1790031915/history

To jest kafejka internetowa (jak tak - to czy działa?)

Czy miejsce gdzie można internet wykupić?

Czy coś innego?
Guilhem G (2025-02-23 15:40:33+00:00): Node: 1790355636 Doesn’t exist. No roads connected together.
jeka p (2017-03-12 17:12:25+00:00): Hallo,
Pfänder gehört zu Lochau, wie ich weiß.
Wieso hast Du hier Bregenz geschrieben?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120925653/history#map=19/47.50764/9.78073

LG,
Jeka
GerdP (2015-10-30 09:25:24+00:00): please review way 167844207:
the tag highway=ice_road is rarely used,
I think it should be highway=track.
Is it a candidate for ice_road=yes 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ice_road
or for ford=yes  ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford
TeVe (2015-10-31 07:30:53+00:00): Fixed:
ice_road = yes
highway = track
tracktype = grade5
GerdP (2015-10-31 08:02:58+00:00): okay, thanks for the feedback.
khalilstasera (2022-11-23 01:29:47+00:00): PT. Emirizan Surya Kencana
rmikke (2022-03-04 22:49:51+00:00): Hej,

co miałeś na myśli, oznaczając tę https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1793082217 aptekę jako dispensing=no? Według mojej wiedzy, to normalna, zarejestrowana apteka, wydająca leki na receptę...
Hjart (2014-12-14 12:14:32+00:00): There's a note here claiming that this campsite no longer exists. Do you have any idea whether that's true?
SomeoneElse (2017-09-06 19:25:31+00:00): Hi,
I think that something has gone wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/486594656/history .  The name of that now says Patterdale, and it used to say Aira Force, but I think that Aira Force is correct because that is where it is.
Maybe you accidentally copied data from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4190436045 ?
Best Regards,
Andy
Nakaner (2015-03-04 17:19:22+00:00): Please turn on your brain before importing garbage! http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2240581#map=10/50.0739/-119.1879
alester (2015-03-04 18:43:06+00:00): You've linked to one object from this changeset, but you haven't given any indication of why it's "garbage". Can you please provide more detail?
Nakaner (2015-03-04 19:31:19+00:00): It's a very large camp site, isn't it? That's the "garbage".
alester (2015-03-04 21:01:13+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out. I'll review all the objects that were created during that import to look for any others that may have been mistagged.

In the future, if you identify something wrong with a changeset, it is much more helpful to describe what you feel is wrong rather than simply describe it as garbage and insult the contributor.
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-05-07 06:15:39+00:00): Hi, LungSabai. I deleted this building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/168093013) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you
Riyadi IRM-RV (2022-12-15 03:29:52+00:00): hi alex rollin
i have come cross mapping this area and trust you as well.
i just delete this waterbody due overlap area waterbody crossing 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/168094445

kindly regret alex
RicoElectrico (2019-06-28 19:33:20+00:00): Cześć, skoro po zamku nie ma śladu, to trzeba go skasować z mapy. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_mapuj_historycznych_wydarze.C5.84_i_nieistniej.C4.85cych_ju.C5.BC_obiekt.C3.B3w
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-06-28 21:05:33+00:00): Dokładniej to chodzi o https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1726764#map=17/51.80234/19.75030 - czy są tam chociaż ruiny?
Graf Westerholt (2022-03-30 10:56:15+00:00): Warum hast du Reformhaus Vita Nova Kaubisch als nur bio eingetragen?
schwukas (2021-02-27 07:38:15+00:00): Ich weiß nicht wie sinnvoll es ist, ein 8 Jahre altes Changeset zu kommentieren, aber ist das eingetragene Telefon an der Waldstraße 1 IM Gebäude oder außerhalb (Telefonzelle)?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 13:49:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1795766495/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
adrienandrem (2019-08-07 17:19:46+00:00): Hello, what is the source of this changeset?
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 04:38:08+00:00): Hi Paul_012. Your edit looks awesome, but I improve geometry of water body  (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/168739079) due the shape is different in the latest imagery and crossing with building. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143789531). Thank you.
eggie (2022-09-08 21:10:22+00:00): Na jaen weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
sperlingskauz (2017-12-03 21:48:27+00:00): Hi blackadder,

for your information: I changed your tagging man_made = bee_hive to man_made = beehive. The reason is that since this year there is a wiki page for beehives.

Regards,
sperlingskauz
geoJenn (2017-12-05 02:02:08+00:00): Hi, MAPNIK. I can't verify the buildings you created in the Upper Pierce Reservoir in any imagery. What source did you use?
geoJenn (2017-12-05 02:05:17+00:00): I am specifically referring to these buildings: 
way 168810767
way 168810815
way 168810799
way 168810762
way 168810778
way 168810808
way 168810775
way 168810818
way 168810737
way 168810785

Thank you!
eggie (2019-12-19 14:07:49+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
GerdP (2015-11-16 13:52:39+00:00): Hallo Klaus,

habe gerade Deine Anmerkung
an diesen beiden Wegen gelesen:
"24.06.2012: access=no entfernt; Grund: es gibt entlang des Weges kleine an Bäumen befestigte Verbotsschilder, diese beziehen sich jedoch auf das Betreten des NSG"
way 40823441,way 128359590
Ich vermute mal, das bezieht sich auch auf die Fuhrt dazwischen ?
way 128359589
toc-rox (2015-11-17 07:20:10+00:00): Ich vermute mal du meinst die Fuhrt im südlichen Teil der Baumberge. Dabei handelt es sich um einen Knüppeldamm der über einen Bach führt, der dort ganz in der Nähe entspringt. Schilder stehen da keine. Nutzbar ist die Fuhrt nur für Fußgänger. Gruß Klaus
GerdP (2015-11-17 07:38:34+00:00): alles klar, habe noch bicycle=dismount
drangehängt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128359589
eggie (2021-05-21 13:57:55+00:00): Dag Henk,
Eerst naar eens een welkomstmail na een aantal jaren inactief..
Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 16:04:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118440382/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
NorthIsland (2018-05-16 12:40:07+00:00): Hi. You have done some landuse NE of Foxhangers Marina. It appears you have defined some areas as barrier=hedge AND landuse=farmland. This renders as a field full of hedge, because hedge can be an area. I think it is normal to define hedges as lines and then add areas of farmland / meadow. Areas may be more than one field.
Graf Westerholt (2017-01-07 13:26:16+00:00): entrance=* wird alleine in einen Knoten gesetzt, nicht mit anderen POI zusammen. Bitte korrigiere es im Vulkankarree.
pinkpy (2017-01-07 19:51:03+00:00): getan, danke für den Hinweis.
philippec (2019-03-16 22:39:59+00:00): Zijn de emergency = phone s nog aktueel ?
philippec (2019-03-28 20:15:43+00:00): Wat is dat voor een node ? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1206060017
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:36:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1800874273/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
berndw (2024-02-01 16:29:07+00:00): My guess, radium73 isn't active anymore and this edit seems to be made very with a lot of phantasy
;-)

I found no source for the name, i will remove it.
berndw (2024-02-01 16:30:20+00:00): done
jyo_1 (2019-03-05 03:29:53+00:00): Hi ceyockey,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, came across 
"way 168946667
way 162281876
way 168946247
way 168945780"  classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery this seems to be 'residential'

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
awesm (2016-03-14 04:27:57+00:00): Did you survey the footway http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85687769 on the ground? I don't see much in close-up imagery except the Kinsey Tce end of this way
philip_lamb (2016-04-20 03:42:26+00:00): Yes, walked it myself. It's a public reserve which also carries the water main for the hill.
Emilius123 (2024-09-14 15:57:26+00:00): Hallo Herr Herd,

Du hast umfangreiche Arbeit in unserer Region geleistet - Vielen Dank! 

Komm doch mal wieder mappen, wir würden uns freuen! :)
trial (2025-05-06 13:36:24+00:00): Certaines notes mettent un certain temps à être transformées en attributs !
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165892509