piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Verdy_p (2018-03-17 01:46:36+00:00): STOP STOP STOP!
You are saying "You're wrong since the begining", and have given NO proof at all that there was any error or problem.

STOP THIS HARASSMENT WAR ! I absolutely don't have to ackowledge your different opinion, keep your opinion and I keep mine, but NO there has been NO demonstrated error at all.

You have repe"atedly refuisedf to acknowledge the fact that I ha
Verdy_p (2018-03-17 02:04:37+00:00): that I had effectively corrected bugs, but you insist on something else that is a NON-ISSUE and NOT what I really corrected, pretending that this name has a semantic value, when in fact it has no value except for contributors using the editing tools as a useful hint (because this name has NEVER been formally assigned 
the semantic you describe, and there has NEVER been any name used on the ground. It has always been descriptive just like "notes=*", except that it is imemdiately visislbe everywhere in efditors when you are about to make confusions with "similar objects" sharing most nodes and ways but not all.

These landmass objects are not formally and legally defined they are almost always estimations of the legal baseline (but with differences because the OSM coastline is on the average high tide, whilst the baseline is normally defined on the average low tide level and include submersible grounds that attach costal rocks to the main land without creating islands, and also will also include water through narrow bays or between chains of islets with narrow passes, or through large estuaries, or  through lagoon tide passes as well as all the inner lagoons). The landmasses also incldues riverbanks, lakes and some human constructions over water, which are on the opposite normally ignored by legal baselines used for international borders except after multilateral agreements and proper registration of claims on the seabed!)

Rethink about it: these landmasses have NO legal name at all on the ground or even in books or legal texts. These names are then ONLY descriptive and still have to be clearly distinctive from names used by legal objects if they don't cover exactly the same thing (and this is the case: landmass objects are always created with the purpose to be different from the legal boundary objects, they describe the physical ground, but not the name which does not exist at all on the ground).
Verdy_p (2018-03-17 02:07:10+00:00): And you pretend that I said only "you're wrong" to you, this is an invention you do! You have constantly used only this argument yourself against me. And you've never presented any evidence. I showed you evidences that whhat you want has NEVER been decided and that it contradicts all past usages made by others since years !
bjoern_m (2018-05-21 09:47:48+00:00): Moin, schön dass neue Hausnummern mit dazukommen. Wahrscheinlich heißen die Hausnummern aber nicht z.B. "1-5", sondern sind einzelne Nummern (wahrscheinlich auch nur 1,3 und 5?). Es wäre schön, wenn die aufgelöst werden-> einzelne nodes z.B. für die Eingänge sind schön
(zur Not geht am Anfang auch noch eine Adress-Interpolation, normalerweise ist das aber nicht nötig.) Heißt die HNr. 17ab wirklich "17ab" oder sind das 17a und 17b? 
Zudem sollten, sofern bekannt, auch die dazugehörigen Straßen direkt mit eingetragen werden. 
Ich habe erstmal ein fixme an einzelne Punkte gesetzt.
Viele Grüße und viel Spaß noch bei den Hausnummern :)
Björn
zstadler (2018-04-15 08:46:09+00:00): Hello hatul,
.
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driver#Using_relations
waterway relations are used for long rivers as it reduces the number of data duplication and helps keep them synchronized.
.
The wiki also says:
Please remember to remove duplicated values from the segments (including waterway=river tag), if they are the same for the whole relation. Segments should be tagged only with values that are specific to them. For example width=* value may belong here, because width of the river usually changes a lot from its source to the mouth.
.
It seems this has not been done here for
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7996152
and in other relations you have created, such as
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7948795/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7949963/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7942579/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7953927/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7958028/history
keujfl839237 (2018-02-06 19:43:03+00:00): + improved road geometry
gurglypipe (2018-02-07 10:42:56+00:00): Houses which are terraced in real life should have connected nodes on the map, so that the areas are joined together. Could you update these houses to do that please? See what the existing ones on Moorefield Close are like for an example. Thanks.
viloan (2018-02-06 19:58:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-12-28 17:24:32+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the change from lit=yes to qq=yes on https://www.osm.org/way/482793147/history?
felipeeugenio (2019-12-28 17:28:59+00:00): Was a typo.
Please fix it
user_5359 (2019-12-28 17:30:36+00:00): Done!
felipeeugenio (2019-12-28 17:32:12+00:00): Thanks
thetornado76 (2018-02-08 11:00:00+00:00): Hallo,
Du hast an etlichen Straßen Adreßzusätze hinzugefügt, wie bspw. addr:street.
Dies ist bei Straßen überflüssig. Die addr keys kommen nicht an die Straße, sondern an die eigentliche Adresse vom Gebäude oder dem POI.
Mir ist auch aufgefallen, dass Du implizite tags wie foot=yes oder ähnliches den Straßen hinzugefügt hast. Yes wird als implizit angenommen und muss nicht getaggt werden.
Viele Grüße
Daniel
Constable (2018-02-07 16:29:08+00:00): ciao cos'è questa strada? esiste davvero ed è già percorribile oppure è solo una proposta?
Pyknite (2018-02-08 12:22:55+00:00): È già percorribile, vedi http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=145040965&postcount=7593 e https://scontent-mxp1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/27164757_803817983144552_132767684969990145_o.jpg?oh=06a963c54acf1fb8c8c2e96b8d9a6bf4&oe=5B18EFA0
Constable (2018-02-09 07:58:55+00:00): perfetto, grazie mille per la risposta e per il pronto aggiornamento!
Buon lavoro!
Ciao
Constable (2018-03-26 14:44:05+00:00): ciao, qualche giorno fa sono passato, il tratto tra i due segnaposto è ancora chiuso
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=45.6932%2C9.0666%3B45.6971%2C9.0681#map=16/45.6964/9.0687&layers=N
Il proseguimento verso nord non ho idea se sia aperto o meno, invece questo tratto è aperto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152657791
Provvedo a "chiudere" il tratto tra via Garibaldi e la SP32
user_7073950 (2018-02-07 19:44:06+00:00): perchè???
Tedesco (2018-02-07 21:07:51+00:00): good question! Non so perchè. As a parent of a school pupil I will try to find out...
user_5359 (2018-02-07 05:29:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the form of your area!
eggie (2018-02-06 20:57:14+00:00): Beste Dylan.. probeer je commentaar aan te passen aan je edits. Dan is duidelijker voor andere mappers wat je doet.
viloan (2018-02-06 20:38:14+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Giblet (2018-02-07 21:15:36+00:00): Hi Ajitha, these actually aren't buildings, just agricultural fields that are separated. I've removed the buildings.
BCNorwich (2019-10-15 12:03:41+00:00): Please don't draw and tag areas (the playground) then place a node (POI) inside the area with the same tags. It's unnecessary duplication. Could you please remove the POI?

Regards Bernard.
SHARCRASH (2018-02-07 13:09:36+00:00): Hi! If you copy/paste elements to create a more detailed ensemble, make sure that the tags are correct for each element. You didn't rectify the lanes for example. Also you didn't update accordingly the route for the PC6 relation. It's done now, i corrected but don't hesitate to have a double check because i'm not aware of all the changes you did.
DeRom (2018-02-07 17:08:41+00:00): You're right. But this area is a big construction site. Lanes changes weekly. My first objective is that the navigation in the construction site area works properly.
SHARCRASH (2018-02-07 17:19:24+00:00): Yeah i know, there are even restriction turns that are not included in OSM, i don't think it's worth putting them, it's a lot of work and they might change soon. That's why i only changed the element's lanes in the northern side of the roundabout in construction. What about this element: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84201329 ??
If i recall correctly there are only 2 lanes, the third lane being the incoming motorway_link.
SHARCRASH (2018-02-07 17:22:21+00:00): Well these constructions have been goign on for quite some time though and quite a few road constructions take time in Luxembourg... (Stafelter tunnel for example). ;) Not a critic, just an observation, better do things right and slow than waste money.
DeRom (2018-02-07 18:00:11+00:00): Yes, two lanes only. The third are in the moment just for motorway access. I passed the construction site this morning and changed the southern roundabout. i want to change the PC6 nearby the Dumontshaff (parallel to the CR169), but i don’t know how delete it. It does not exist anymore at the moment.
SHARCRASH (2018-02-08 14:45:24+00:00): This cycleway :  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349568951
or
starting here : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3883713018
??
DeRom (2018-02-08 15:26:16+00:00): Hi,
The first,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349568951
A67-A67 (2018-02-06 22:31:42+00:00): Ik begrijp deze wijziging niet echt. Die korte stukjes weg en fietspaden hebben toch gewoon een naam?
Martin Borsje (2018-02-07 05:25:11+00:00): Inderdaad, maar doordat het stukjes van soms minder dan tien meter betreft loop de kruising vol met straatnamen, alle dubbel.
Ik geef toe, (ont)taggen fo the renderer, maar navigatietechnisch hebben we toch niet zoveel namen op elkaar gepropt nodig?
A67-A67 (2018-02-09 20:58:40+00:00): Het gaat er niet om dat er veel namen op elkaar zijn gepropt. Er zijn hier nu veel ways, omdat het een ingewikkeld kruispunt is. 
Ten eerste hebben bijna al die wegen een naam. Daar is de name-tag voor. Als die tag niet is ingevuld gaat het om een weg zonder naam, wat niet het geval is.
Ten tweede is het irritant bij het bewerken van relaties dat er een heleboel wegen zonder naam (dus alleen met id) in de lijst staan, zeker als die wegen eigenlijk wel een naam hebben.
Ten derde is het opgepropt zijn van de namen een renderingsprobleem. Als een naam al veel voorkomt op een stuk kaart, dat hoeft een renderer niet voor elke way een label met dezelfde naam te maken.
Ten vierde zijn er wel degelijk fouten nu in de navigatie. Bij de link hieronder ga je in stap 3 linksaf de Hooikade op. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=52.0058%2C4.3590%3B52.0046%2C4.3606#map=18/52.00522/4.35969
Martin Borsje (2018-02-09 21:06:56+00:00): Ik heb naar mijn beste weten geen ways verwijderd...maar ik kan het mischebben. Dat was iig zeker niet de bedoeling!
A67-A67 (2018-02-10 10:58:34+00:00): Nee je hebt inderdaad geen ways verwijderd. Het gaat me puur om de name-tags van ways die wel een naam hebben. Vooral voor wegen die in elkaars verlengde liggen, zou dit niet eens renderingsproblemen moeten geven.
Ik denk zelfs dat het nu een stuk minder opgepropt wordt zonder namen als Tram 1 en Tram 19.
Verder heel veel lof voor je werk aan OSM. Alleen deze wijziging vind ik erg raar, omdat het erg in gaat tegen alles wat er op het forum over taggen voor de renderer wordt gezegd.
Martin Borsje (2018-02-10 12:23:36+00:00): :-)
We vinden elkaar wel!

En ja: taggen alleen voor het renderen is natuurlijk uit den boze. Maar een probleem is toch dat als hele kleien stukjes weg (tien meter lang) die geknipt zijn wegens een route, een bruggetje etc., die een 'eigen' naam krijgen toch vaak op de standaardkaart die naam erop gepropt  krijgen. Dit geeft een heel druk kaartbeeld.
Ik zal opnieuw aangebrachte namen op wegdelen niet weghalen, maar wees aub een beetje 'voorzichtig' en: taggen voor het routeren slechts.....:-)
rene78 (2018-02-08 19:40:39+00:00): Hi Iam Aloba,

thanks for your first edit on OpenStreetMap! I added some tags to your geometry so that it gets shown correctly on the map.

All the best. And keep it coming ;)
Rene
viloan (2018-02-06 21:17:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
canfe (2019-09-09 08:28:12+00:00): E' un memorial non monument.
user_5359 (2018-02-07 05:26:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't use abbreviation on street names. Stands the abbreviation cmn for common?
VetTrnrDraco (2018-02-07 09:30:30+00:00): User_5359, thank you for the feedback. I however was not the one to originally lay out the route I merely corrected it's path. When I am at my computer later I will update that. I am curious though as to why that one matters over St, Rd, or Ave?
freebeer (2018-02-07 13:19:19+00:00): One can trivially go from, say, Avenida to Ave.  But how do you know if Pl should be expanded to Platz, Plaza, Playa, or if Tr is Trail or Trace?  St for Straße (yeah, I know, Str.), Strada, Street?  And lots more.  Like, is E the letter E in a series A-N, or short for East?
There are many more languages where a common abbreviation (Ul.) gets expanded to different things, just as there are many more possibilities the above examples could be expanded into.
Hope that gives you the perspective to understand!
VetTrnrDraco (2018-02-07 13:27:54+00:00): I appreciate the feedback, I have updated the road name. My best guess is to use the local nomenclature. I live in the area and wouldn't even try to edit areas in Europe or Canada as I have no firsthand knowledge of those places.
user_5359 (2018-02-07 15:46:00+00:00): I would like to remind you carefully, that OSM isn't a national project! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
By the way, I usually change this without asking, but I didn't really know the meaning of the abbreviation CMN. You were "just" the local mapper, I could ask for the local interpretation.
freebeer (2018-02-08 01:10:58+00:00): Hallo Vet,
I have just opened a challenge bug-report as
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1292856
in Mexico which only took me less than a minute to find :-)
I am sure that you - or anyone around the world who can understand english and knows the OSM guidelines we are discussing here, can edit there 100% without any problems.
There are many, many ways to contribute to OSM from afar, that are just as good as being local.
Feel free to try this if you like.  The world is a big place, and OSM gives you the chance to explore it and contribute without being there or knowing about it.
Thanks for your fixes!
VetTrnrDraco (2018-02-09 16:07:23+00:00): Such as I said user_5359, I was not the original user to map Westbrook Common. I do apologize for not catching the confusion when editing.
Jason Harrison (2018-02-10 00:52:26+00:00): Edit is good
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56130513
Constable (2018-02-07 09:11:34+00:00): per favore quando salvi una modifica inserisci una breve descrizione di ciò che hai modificato. Qualcosa come "aggiunto edificio", "aggiunto tag superficie a strada",...
Grazie!
maraf24 (2018-02-07 20:59:20+00:00): Usunięty.
Hernan (2018-02-07 12:13:43+00:00): Cambios revertidos por vandalismo
maraf24 (2018-02-07 20:59:02+00:00): Usunięty.
maraf24 (2018-02-07 20:58:49+00:00): Usunięty.
user_5359 (2018-02-07 05:13:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. Can this address marked as leisure=fitness_centre (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre)?
marczoutendijk (2022-07-26 08:24:03+00:00): Hallo,
voor dit object:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199479258
gebruik je landuse=garage terwijl de juiste vorm landuse=garages is.
Zie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgarages
Is die keuze voor enkelvoud bewust?
Groet,
Marc
vjyblauw (2022-08-01 19:47:15+00:00): hoi marczoetendijk,
 
neen dit was geen bewuste keuze maar een foute keuze.
ik heb de gegevens aangepast, er zijn daar ook geen garages maar een bouwonderneming D’Herte
Groet, 
vjyblauw
JJIglesias (2018-02-07 02:54:11+00:00): Saludos y bien q agregaras la tienda, un pequenio detalle cuando pones el addr:country debe ser Bolivia, cuando es addr:country_code entonces si es BO;
//
Seria genial si puedes agregar otros negocios o puntos de interes (POI)
//
Gracias
JJ
JadeHeart (2018-02-08 16:57:29+00:00): Saludos JJ,

Parece ser que según el wiki de OSM, la forma correcta de indicar el país en addr:country es con el ISO-2 code. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr

Gracias
JJIglesias (2018-02-09 08:27:54+00:00): Tienes razon, es en el is_in:country que se pone Bolivia; ahora si quieres colocarlo como dirección postal el ISO 3166 Alpha 2 No te sirve de nada pues no es el Utilizado por los Servicios Postales del Mundo... sino el full name del pais
Gracias JJ
chnav (2018-02-08 04:17:56+00:00): Hi, may I ask you not to draw redundant points on streets and roads. e.g. the street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/559255255 has right angle corner and no extra nodes required on turns, it shall be mapped with 3 nodes instead of 8.  
We do not map road lanes nor tyre signs. It is also good practice mapping unpaved streets in villages as straight lines as possible keeping node counts at minimum. Next year rain puddle can be different place )) Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:15:43+00:00): Hi juanpoke10, welcome to OSM.

Please only map what's on the ground. Don't add fictive map data, that's #vandalism ! Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56132011
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-07 14:24:35+00:00): Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap. Perché hai messo access=no? È un cancello chiuso a chiave? È un tratto di way privata?
Edoardo Simonelli (2018-02-07 14:28:36+00:00): ci sono stato il 4/2 ed effettivamente c'e' un cancello chiuso con lucchetto. Credo sia aggirabile da un lato ma non ho provato per evitare problemi.
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-08 06:20:06+00:00): Sarebbe bello riuscire a sapere se è una strada privata e a questo punto mettere un access=private.
Edoardo Simonelli (2018-02-08 06:50:00+00:00): be il cancello da accesso alla vigna piu' su.
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-08 11:29:43+00:00): Ok, allora bisogna mettere access=private. Grazie
elotrojames (2018-08-10 23:11:50+00:00): Con este cambio se modificó el nombre de la parada del tren por uno incorrecto. Para definir los nombres de las paradas utilizamos los que indica el INCOFER en los horarios (http://www.incofer.go.cr/tren-urbano-alajuela-rio-segundo/). El nombre del nodo debe ser "Miraflores".
canfe (2020-12-29 17:07:34+00:00): a me sembra un posteggio
559264447, v1
Moiman (2018-02-22 09:59:29+00:00): You probably removed building tag accidentally
viloan (2018-02-06 23:27:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
santamariense (2018-02-07 19:08:14+00:00): Bem vindo ao OSM. Só uma observação: Temos por boa prática no OSM não deletar para refazer. Ao invés disso vamos realinhando o objeto até ficar como queremos, preservando assim o seu histórico.
Refiro me a esta rua: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56132982
Boas contribuições e não exite em perguntar.
user santamariense
zstadler (2018-10-08 16:36:16+00:00): Hello Dov and welcome to OSM!
.
In this edit (changeset) you have created a line with no tags. Without any tags, this line (way) is meaningless.
.
I would like to help fixing it. Plase let me know what you intended to do.
.
In the edit comment you wrote "close road". Can you explain which road is closed and how.
.
Thank you for your edits!
.
Zeev
jgon6 (2018-02-07 04:41:52+00:00): The way you have the intersection of Langsdon Pass and Delray Drive mapped makes it apear as if the whole road curves around in a strange way. I've come across these sorta Cul-De-Sac things before, and I've mapped them as the roads intersecting at a 90 degree angle, and then on the node were they intersect tagging the node as highway=turning_circle. I think mapping in this manner would work better.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56133586