piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DaveF (2015-08-13 10:03:16+00:00): Sorry for the delayed reply.
OSM is a database. Lot's of different rendering are mad from this one source. It allows map creators to add relevent data & ignore what the don't want.

What's now described as the 'standard' map ie the mapnik rendering unfortunately doesn't render all barriers. It would be good if it did. You can lobby your case for it here: Grumpy Cat

Dave F.
DaveF (2015-08-17 13:40:56+00:00): Err... try https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues
SomeoneElse (2015-08-17 16:47:15+00:00): Looks like geocaching.com (if that's what you're talking about) offer lots of different background styles, but don't host any themselves, so you'd just have to lobby for one of those to support it; not necessarily openstreetmap-carto.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-17 21:02:40+00:00): Just for info, I've just added a separate "kissing_gate" icon to https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/openstreetmap-carto-AJT (that's a style that other people can use if they want to).  See https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L877 for which gate types are shown as gates and which as kissing_gates.
In OSM's "standard" style there's an open issue about displaying more barrier types https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/846 .
trigpoint (2016-12-20 16:53:37+00:00): Not really a comment on the mapping, or the rendering, but if a PROW has stiles or kissing gates then it is a public footpath. You should not be taking a bike on such paths.
DaveF (2016-12-20 17:06:25+00:00): There's nothing to prevent someone pushing a bike; although a few walkers have disagreed with me.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-11-29 07:37:08+00:00): For http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345281335 please have a read of http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_repair_station
TuanIfan (2015-11-29 13:44:06+00:00): Hi @Bryce C Nesbitt,
Thanks for correcting me. Yeah i somehow made two different tags for the car repair shop. I just checked and removed the bike repair tag accordingly.

Really appreciate your help.

Cheers,
Hufkratzer (2016-05-24 15:18:53+00:00): Why did you change the route type from horse to foot here? I think this is the riding route from Kostrzyn to Nowe Polichno for which I started a new relation (6247548) recently before I saw this one. Since your relation is older I propose that I move the elements from the new one to this one and change the tags like they are in the new one (back to horse route). Do you mind if I do that or do you have objections?
GerdP (2015-10-21 07:55:43+00:00): please review:
I've changed tag 
highway=re to highway=residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34771493
Rudolf Mayer (2017-09-19 15:36:31+00:00): for mini golf, please use leisure=miniature_golf (fixed for http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3634439340#map=19/49.76856)
ViriatoLusitano (2015-07-06 00:41:44+00:00): Olá bobson74, benvindo ao OSM!

Não entendi muito bem esta edição, pretendes adicionar o nº da saída da autoestrada a este ponto?
hebolz (2015-09-02 06:52:19+00:00): Hallo carcharodon, 

bzgl. way 309041540 (Pfad auf dem Strietberg bei Schiffweiler): was ist mit Breite = 0 gemeint? Tippfehler?
VG  hebolz
pantufla (2020-04-25 17:08:13+00:00): Hola, seguro que está bien que usemos una línea de ferry para un traycto irregular que no es con ferry
Meillo (2015-07-04 19:34:05+00:00): Thanks!
boneco (2015-07-06 16:36:02+00:00): ze bernardes, quando for criar uma relação, as tags de boundary=administrative não precisam ser inseridas na linha, como aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358540241 , basta apenas na relação, senão se torna informação duplicada e mais trabalho pra você.
ze bernardes (2015-07-08 14:04:14+00:00): Boneco, eu uso a linha limite Administrativo
boneco (2015-07-08 17:39:24+00:00): somente a linha limite administrativo ou vc cria também a relação?
ze bernardes (2015-07-09 17:09:24+00:00): sim.
ndm (2015-07-04 21:57:44+00:00): You haven't added tags to 358540486 - so it's still incomplete
smaprs (2015-07-04 21:04:52+00:00): A chaminé da usina não é redonda?
ftrebien (2015-07-04 22:38:12+00:00): Quantos pontos um círculo precisa ter para ser um círculo?
smaprs (2015-07-04 22:50:17+00:00): A chaminé é de planta redonda?
ftrebien (2015-07-06 14:07:43+00:00): Sim, é, mas a minha pergunta foi quantos pontos um polígono no OSM tem que ter para ser considerado um círculo. Não existem curvas no OSM, tudo são polylines. Que tal um octógono? Acho muito para algo tão pequeno, mas vamos lá, pela discussão. Um octógono introduziria a recomendação geral de usar 45° como resolução angular mínima, valeria inclusive para o traçado das ruas.
ftrebien (2015-07-06 14:36:10+00:00): Então, alterei para um octógono. É quase impossível notar que é um octógono no zoom 18, apenas no zoom 19 (o zoom máximo). Acredito que a maioria das pessoas vai interpretar isso como representante de um círculo.
smaprs (2015-07-06 17:00:22+00:00): Ok.
DD1GJ (2015-07-04 21:35:17+00:00): addr:* tags beschreiben die postalischen Adressen von Gebäuden. Sie sind an anderen Objekten überflüssig und verwirrend
chillly (2015-07-04 19:53:50+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

You have added two areas, but there are no tags on them to define what they are. If you need any help please ask.
eBin (2016-03-04 13:19:54+00:00): O co chodzi z tymi przedrostkami Przylep?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/523033
eBin (2016-03-04 13:21:47+00:00): Aa przyłączenie miejscowości.
Namysław Tatarynowicz (2016-03-04 14:31:12+00:00): Zgadza się. Jakiś czas temu Zielona Góra "wchłonęła" kilka mniejszych miejscowości. Stąd dawna nazwa w nazwach ulic.
Pozdrawiam.
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-27 21:53:25+00:00): Hi!  Could you break up the Norman LCN relation into individual routes, please?  This will improve maintainability as it'll actually be possible to validate, and is more consistent with the idea that relations are not categories, and that route relations contain one individual route.
Stalfur (2015-07-05 01:40:29+00:00): Happy to have you!
ikiya (2015-07-09 23:51:33+00:00): 地名に関する編集のsourceを示してください。よろしくお願いします。
Palolo (2019-10-17 14:27:01+00:00): Are you sure there is a bridge at the neck of Kiwa Lake? I don't recall seeing one there.
Thanks for the contributions.
Seandebasti (2019-11-16 12:39:24+00:00): I fixed it, because on older imagery there was a tree klooking like a bridge to use ;)
mmorgado (2015-07-08 19:18:24+00:00): Queria que você me explicasse porquê não se pode passar com carro neste viaduto ?
Você alterou totalmente a rota da cidade

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309090507
dbusse (2015-07-08 19:48:45+00:00): Is there any reason for a explicit motor_vehicle=yes for a highway=secondary?

Is there a situation where a motor_vehicle=no on a highway=secondary makes sense?

Could you please explain?

I re-added that tag and josh complains that this is unneccessary.

Best Regards,

Dieter
mmorgado (2015-07-08 21:05:39+00:00): Dieter
Se é desnecessário como diz porquê colocou no ?
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
romanshuvalov (2015-08-24 12:49:11+00:00): Это что за правка такая интересная? Стёрли building=yes у больницы, перекрёсток Коммунистическая-Механизаторов улетел черт знает куда... (?!!)
d1g (2015-08-29 06:48:18+00:00): Это ошибка iD, http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=29050 тег здания нужно руками добавлять после выбора заготовки shop=* / amenity=*
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
malenki (2015-07-06 20:35:54+00:00): Die Westpreußenstraße habe ich mal wieder benannt: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23501511/history
Lyubchenko Denis (2015-07-28 14:16:38+00:00): Зачем то удалены теги принадлежности НП Карасаз к области и району.
Andrea Musuruane (2015-07-05 08:33:37+00:00): Ciao. Puoi spiegarmi cosa rappresentano i name=7; name=7B; name=7C associati ai 3 punti che hai fatto?
Trifone Girasole (2015-07-05 20:37:58+00:00): ciao Andrea,
sarebbero i numeri civici.
Sono alla mia prima esperienza con OpenStreetMap: c'è un modo più corretto di inserirli? Mi puoi aiutare?
Grazie mille, ciao, Stefano.
Andrea Musuruane (2015-07-06 13:10:16+00:00): Ciao Stefano,
Ieri ho corretto il nome della stradina di accesso e ho sistemato i civici associati alle abitazioni.

In genere in Italia i numeri civici sono però associati a ingressi, cancelli, ecc e non a tutto un edificio. Questo perché un ingresso pedonale e uno carrabile potrebbero avere civici differenti. Oppure anche più accessi a un condominio posso avere civici diversi.

In questo modo è anche più facile per un navigatore portarti correttamente all'indirizzo desiderato.

Ci sono 3 numeri civici che hai indicato come punti (utilizzando il tag name che è comunque errato) che non si capisce se sono stati posizionati a cancelli o altre feature. Puoi specificare?

Una volta spostati i civici sugli ingressi (ovvero dove c'è la targhetta corrispondente) si dovrebbero rimuovere dagli edifici.

Ciao,

Andrea
Trifone Girasole (2015-07-07 12:45:47+00:00): ciao,
prova a controllare se adesso va meglio: ho messo i civici nel punto esatto degli ingressi alle abitazioni, e ho tracciato la parte pedonale dalla strada all'ingresso.
Stefano
Andrea Musuruane (2015-07-07 13:00:37+00:00): Ciao Stefano,
adesso mi sembrano OK. Ho solo eliminato i civici dagli edifici e ho portato il resto degli indirizzi sugli ingressi (via, cap, città).
Ciao,
Andrea
ikiya (2015-07-09 23:51:06+00:00): 地名に関する編集のsourceを示してください。よろしくお願いします。
FTA (2015-07-06 04:51:41+00:00): Hi there, I noticed you deleted an enormous quantity of nodes on ways that were boundaries. Is there a particular reason for this? It looks like the relation for the  [Vrachanski Balkan Natural Park](http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4272269) is broken too.
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
chnav (2015-09-28 17:05:43+00:00): The motorroad in KZ and RUS marked with road sign 5.1 (special rools applied) otherwise it is trunk; please confirm such major edits with proper comments and proofs; for now it is changed back to trunk.

ref: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway
chnav (2015-09-28 17:06:48+00:00): *rules*
RicoElectrico (2015-07-05 10:37:14+00:00): Goła linia z samym name=* nie ma sensu. Dodałem tagi man_made=pipeline substance=heat. Nie wiem natomiast czy główna mapa na osm.org wyświetla, chyba nie. Ale pewnie znalazłaby się inna.
Dokumentacja tutaj:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=pipeline
RicoElectrico (2015-07-05 10:40:22+00:00): O, tu chociażby jest jedna:
http://www.itoworld.com/map/220
Mówię o tym, bo nie wszystko co się mapuje widać na domyślnym stylu osm.org, a niektórzy mistrzowie tagują rzeczy niezgodnie z rzeczywistością, byle się wyświetlały ;-)
GerdP (2015-10-24 14:15:05+00:00): Bitte prüfen:
Weg 184019745 
Ist das eine Stadtmauer 
(historic=citywalls bzw. barrier=city_wall)
oder ein Stadttor
(historic=city_gate)
Evtl. die Linie splitten.
Ein highway=citywalls ist es bestimmt nicht.
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-01 19:05:14+00:00): Hallo,
es ist schon sehr lange her, aber vielleicht kennst du es hier:
Ist dieser Weg auch für Fußgänger eine Einbahn? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358611714
maraf24 (2015-07-11 10:02:41+00:00): To są zmyślone adresy - numery nie pokrywają z tymi na domach.
Wprowadzanie fałszywych informacji na mapę jest niedopuszalne.
Владимир К (2015-11-23 14:30:12+00:00): amenity=kindergarten вешается не на здание, а на территорию детского сада, забор вокруг здания. то же самое со школами и универами
*Martin* (2015-07-06 07:41:26+00:00): Ahoj Lorx2. Len taka poznamocka: horse=yes, bicycle=yes a foot=yes znamena ze je mozne ist po tej ceste na koni / bicykli a peso cisto z legislativneho hladiska a tym padom su tieto tagy zbytocne kedze pre highway=track sa toto berie automaticky ak nie je povedane inac.
Lorx2 (2015-07-06 10:51:23+00:00): Ok. Beriem na vedomie.
RicoElectrico (2015-07-05 13:26:11+00:00): Wiesz, że dodajesz puste obszary tylko z area=yes? Popraw to, wybierz "budynek" z typów obiektów jakie masz po lewej stronie. No i kształty które mają kąty 90 stopni prostujemy klawiszem S.
JohnnyEN (2015-07-05 13:32:52+00:00): Drinking water
literan (2015-07-07 11:18:24+00:00): тег name - для имен собственных!!! сколько можно говорить об этом! все исправляю на description=
Vachok (2015-07-07 11:23:12+00:00): Да, только description на нави не видно, и в прокладке маршрута оно не учавствует. Как предупредить, незнакомого с местностью человека об этом?
literan (2015-07-07 11:36:53+00:00): а что, name как-то участвует в прокладке маршрута навигатором? :)

а если по делу, то все можно обозначить тегами: отрисовать овраг тегами natural=gully (вроде какими-то навигаторами он поддерживается) + в ряде навигаторов можно подключить горизонтали от SRTM - будет по ним овраг видно.

Можно задать для path теги уклона, теги качества покрытия, теги mtb:scale - именно они поддерживаются навигаторами! 

Ну а поле, которое вы в name записали как "Труднопроходимое, заросшее" - это вообще зачем? через него и дорог нет.
literan (2015-07-07 11:38:37+00:00): кстати, вы каким навигатором пользуетесь? рекомендую OSMand под Android - я сам велосипедист-кантрийщик, и он мне отлично помогает. Можно включить режим показа качества и типа покрытия - сразу видно, где следует ехать, а где нет.
Vachok (2015-07-07 11:45:26+00:00): У меня Garmin EDGE 1000. Поле пометил для игроков в Ingress :) . Дорог по нему нет, но там есть игровая точка, на которую потенциально могут приехать. И чтобы не получилось, что люди приедут неподготовленными :)
literan (2015-07-07 11:53:57+00:00): Ну, в любом случае, мапить под конкретный рендерер нельзя - это главная заповедь!
EdLoach (2015-11-20 15:49:28+00:00): This seems to be an exact duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32426640 - would you like me to try and revert one or other of the changesets? If so which would you prefer?
user_1525419 (2015-11-22 15:39:19+00:00): Ah! It must have uploaded from Josm twice! (It appeared to fail the first time but must have actually succeeded). If it is possible to just remove all the added data from the first changeset 32426640 that would probably be best. If this isn't straightforward let me know and I'll work out a manual fix in Josm when I get a moment of spare time..
EdLoach (2015-11-23 08:38:19+00:00): I'm told that some of the duplicates have already been removed manually which makes things a bit trickier. I spotted it because when editing in the area in P2 it highlights all the duplicated nodes on top of each other, so might be easier to just use that to spot duplicates and remove them. Although JOSM validator might also have something which might help. So not as straightforward as I'd at first thought.
EdLoach (2016-01-18 16:59:06+00:00): Pretty sure I've now managed to de-duplicate using P2 manually.
user_1525419 (2016-01-21 21:35:16+00:00): Great! JOSM has a similar tool and normaly would check for and warn of conflicts before upload. Something just went wrong that time.
EdLoach (2016-01-21 22:55:22+00:00): I've had similar happen in the past when trying to upload large sets of changes and JOSM not getting confirmation of success for some reason, so I've tried again. Because it doesn't know the first upload was there it doesn't know that trying again will duplicate. I upload more frequently now to keep the changesets small, just in case.
Nakaner (2015-10-25 13:12:45+00:00): Du hast dich bei diesem Signal vermutlich verklickt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1600332293/history

Das Lf 1/2 gibt es nur in Ostdeutschland, du meintest vermutlich das Lf 1. Ich persönlich mappe keine Lf 1, Lf 2 und Lf 3, wenn ich nicht eine zeitnahe Aktualisierung sicherstellen kann. Diese Signale sind vergleichbar mit mehr oder minder kurzzeitigen Straßenbaustellen. Deshalb habe ich es auch nicht umgetaggt.

Das Lf 1/2 (DV 301) mappe ich übrigens, weil ich beobachtet habe, dass solche Schilder Ewigkeiten stehen und also deutlich dauerhafter als Lf 1 bis 3 sind.
bigbug21 (2015-10-25 19:26:15+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich hab das Tag hearusgenommen und es bei einer verbalen Beschreibung belassen. Ein über mehrere Jahre anhaltender Geschwindigkeitseinbruch von 160 auf 90 km/h ist für meine Begriffe durchaus relevant.
Nakaner (2015-10-25 19:44:43+00:00): Ja, dauerhafte Langsamfahrstellen sind relevant.

Ist diese Langsamfahrstelle über mehrere Jahre hinweg mit Lf 1, Lf 2 und Lf 3 signalisiert (gewesen)? Ich bin bisher davon ausgegangen, dass die Mehrheit (oder alle) Lf 1–Lf 3 temporärer Natur sind. Wenn die La nicht behoben wird, werden sie halt nach einiger Zeit durch Lf 6/L 7 ersetzt. So zumindest mein bisheriger Kenntnisstand. Deshalb habe ich mich bisher auch nicht um diese Signale gekümmert und keine Icons dafür gezeichnet.
bigbug21 (2015-10-26 21:01:18+00:00): Die Signalisierung deckt eine Behelfesbrücke im Ostkopf des Bahnhofs und ist schon seit längerer Zeit da.
MKnight (2015-11-19 14:26:13+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier 2 Gebäude überlappt, magste Dir das nochmal anschauen?

Ich hätte das auch gern korrigiert, aber das is mir zu komplex und ohne Ortskenntnis...

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=18&lat=51.874025&lon=11.045232&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&item=&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
os-emmer (2023-12-13 20:12:37+00:00): Hi REACH_zaatari,
it seems like you added a lot of notes in this area using the street=* tag. What does that mean? Is it a synonym for addr:street=*?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4025675
thianini (2015-07-05 15:29:34+00:00): Adicionado Targa Tecnologia. Minha loja.
Skippern (2015-07-06 22:24:00+00:00): Parecendo voce editou muito mais que esse loja
thianini (2015-07-07 01:23:15+00:00): Coloquei o prédio da PGR no lugar, por que estava torto. É tipo toque, já trabalhei lá.
literan (2015-07-07 10:24:27+00:00): зачем вы ставите номер дома в тег name= ???? Это бессмысленно, так никто не найдет нужный дом в навигаторе или на карте. Для номера дома используется совсем другой тег: addr:housenumber=

Исправьте, пожалуйста, или я полностью откачу вашу правку как в корне ошибочную и бессмысленную.
mgpx (2015-07-05 22:00:02+00:00): Úgy túnik, mintha az Aklok-rétje - Magas-hídi-rét közti út (volt K3) fix offsettel keletre lett volna tolva ebben a CS-ben. Az új geomtriája viszont abszolúte nem illeszkedik a kontroll adatokra.
grin (2015-07-06 07:50:15+00:00): A Way: 118093194 -re gondolsz? Nekem most május 25-én konzisztensen arrébb volt. Mik a kontroll adatok?
mgpx (2015-07-06 08:20:58+00:00): Nem, a 118093170/358650740 utakra, achavi-val jól látszik az eltolás http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=32429807. Nyugaton a P+ becsatlakozási pont hibája is jól mutatja  az egész vonal elhúzását. Referenciának a tárolt GPS logokat és a FÖMI-t vettem, de tuhu-val összevetve is nagyon más a nyomvonal.
grin (2015-07-06 08:37:34+00:00): Bocsánat, félreérthető voltam: igen, természetesen én mozgattam el, nem véletlen volt. Én megnéztem az OSM DB-t, ott egyetlen track volt, az én két kütyüm pedig konzisztensen arrébb húzta. FÖMI-t nem értem mi, tuhut nem tudom megnézni. Ha van öbb ide vonatkozó tracket töltsd fel a db-be és akkor meg tudom nézni én is. Az enyémet mindjárt megkeresem.
mgpx (2015-07-06 08:59:09+00:00): "Privát" tracklogom nincs, a JOSM-ben én 4 csiganyálat látok, egy 2005-öst, egy 2009-est és két anonimot. Az út nyugati végének első pár száz méterét pár hete két kütyüvel oda-vissza bejártam, azon a rövid szakaszon 8 feltöltött tracklog van (ott is jól látszik az eltérés). FÖMI alatt a 2000-es ortofotót értem. Tuhu csempéket én JOSM alátét rétegként szoktam berakni.
grin (2015-07-06 09:03:15+00:00): Most nézd meg, légy szíves, a négyből kettőt megtaláltam, a másik kettőt valahol azóta elkevertem. Nekem most lehívva a mostani állapothoz közelebb esik a vonal. Amit pár hete bejártál azt teljes nyugalommal told oda, ahova gondolod, de amire csak „más” források vannak az legyen inkább a felmért. Amikor arra jártunk akkor épp egy csomó helyen láthatóan új nyomvonalon ment a kidőlések, leomlott részek, elmosott utak miatt. (Amúgy is le volt az egész zárva; azóta megnyitották?)
mgpx (2015-07-06 11:41:56+00:00): Köszi, most már a Te trackjeid is megjelennek a JOSM-ben. Én ezeket látom: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B26Dv-VaZiKkfk5wUVIxbGFDQ2lVTkJhTi1RS1B0ejN4SGFQUkVTQVdwWFdHa21YYjVlTEE&usp=sharing

Szívem szerint még igazítanék kicsit a geometrián, de azt így távolról valóban nem tudom eldönteni, hol van illesztési hiba, és hol történt nyomvonal változás
grin (2015-07-06 12:31:41+00:00): Mivel végig erdős, szurdokos út volt nem akartam rajta tekergetni, csak a láthatóan egyező eltolást csináltam meg de nyugodtan igazítsd az átlaghoz ha bízol benne, én megbízom benned is. :-) Az a baj hogy több helyen volt kidőlt fa, elmosott útrész ezért nem tudom hogy akkor épp kikerültünk egy bazi fát, cserjés részt vagy tényleg az út ment arrébb. Itt ritkábban is fényképeztem mert tiszta kosz voltam a mászástól. :-P Emiatt nem igazgattam az utat a trackemre. De az tény hogy több helyen nem volt út, GPS alapján mentem és a csoport egyszer közölte hogy micsináljak vele, amikor 500 m-es körzetben haladni sem lehetett, nem hogy út lett volna. ;-)
RicoElectrico (2015-07-05 17:26:38+00:00): O co chodzi z tymi bezsensownymi obszarami otagowanymi tylko landuse=yes?
Np. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358651307

Proszę o poprawę tego.
maraf24 (2015-07-11 09:02:35+00:00): Nie umieszczamy w nazwie budynku jego adresu, gdyż:
1. to nie jest nazwa budynku
2. na adres jest już przeznaczone inne miejsce
maraf24 (2015-07-11 09:00:48+00:00): Po narysowaniu budynku proszę w edytorze nacisnąć S - wyprostuje to kąty i budynek nie będzie taki krzywy.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-01-22 04:30:52+00:00): To chyba jakiś żart?
mueschel (2019-12-15 14:14:03+00:00): Hi,
it's a long time ago, but it seems you tried to change the name of this restaurant. Could you check its tags?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1286550627

Thanks!
Magnus Bäck (2019-12-15 14:59:52+00:00): Oops, that was a mistake. It should've been name=Pitcher's. However, Pitcher's has now moved so I've cleared the name tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78431797 until I know the name of the replacement (pretty sure it's still a restaurant). Thanks!
maxerickson (2015-07-06 02:46:14+00:00): I don't understand the point of doing this versus just deleting it entirely or marking it as access=private.

The road is a short dead end that is presumably blocked at the beginning, so it would be difficult for a router or whatnot to create a big problem.
zarl (2015-11-15 11:56:01+00:00): name=Baustelle kann man sich allgemein sparen. Der name-Tag ist eher für auf dem Baustellen-Schild erkennbare Benennung wie "Seniorenpark Isarblick" etc. gedacht.

Das es eine Baustelle ist, sieht man an der Färbung auf der Karte.
derredu (2015-11-15 16:18:19+00:00): und wofür steht "gnss" als source tag?