piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Niiepce (2022-07-23 14:38:45+00:00): Der Biergarten wurde schon eingetragen. Ich habe das Duplikat entfernt.
Rom1 (2021-09-21 19:40:44+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé ces modifications car les adresses étaient déjà présentes. Bonne continuation quand même.
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-09-22 03:26:55+00:00): Откат.
1. То, что это надо отмечать полигоном, личные хотелки. Мне не надо. Принимайте пропозал, создавайте страницу для тега.
2. В теге source отсебятина, я не этим источником пользовался.
То есть это механическая правка, вот и всё.
vulasala (2021-09-22 04:56:56+00:00): Hi CatalinGadalean,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 985542440 from service to residential, as the way giving access to multiple rooftops.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111500393
vulasala (2021-09-22 04:46:30+00:00): Hi LucianIelciu,
Trust you are doing well. I have added bridge tag for way 985690772. 
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111500475
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
vulasala (2021-09-22 04:22:02+00:00): Hi LucianIelciu,
Trust you are doing well. I have removed the connectivity of way 985543612 from node 5037403340, as there is no connectivity.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111500628
smithandyr (2021-09-22 14:21:54+00:00): This running trail is regularly used.  I asked for review only because this is my first time using OpenStreetMap
smithandyr (2021-09-22 14:21:00+00:00): This running trail is regularly used.  I asked for review only because this is my first time using OpenStreetMap
vulasala (2021-09-22 03:57:29+00:00): Hi peterkata,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the road classification way 985547358 and way 985547355, as the way giving access to multiple rooftops and aligned ways as per the ground reality.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111501254
Thierry1030 (2024-05-08 06:02:10+00:00): Hello, according to this note there's no road/way here ... can you confirm?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4234819#map=17/50.72149/4.59959
filu (2024-05-08 12:55:19+00:00): I lived 2 years ago there, not sure now, sorry.
Thierry1030 (2024-05-09 23:24:33+00:00): ok, thx for your reply anyway
DaveF (2021-09-22 12:20:19+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM. Nice house detailing.
One point- If possible we try to amend existing objects, rather than delete them, as it retains their edited history.
jmapb (2025-06-21 21:00:52+00:00): Regarding Hilton Holiday Gardens (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627639475), the parks department classifies this as "Recreational Field/Courts" at https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/hilton-holiday-gardens/ ... I didn't see anyone playing here, but I could imagine it. What do you think of landuse=recreation_ground?
daniel_solow (2025-06-23 14:39:25+00:00): Admittedly I have not been by that lot in a couple years. Last time I was, it was not a very inviting and overgrown. If there is updated imagery showing things I have changed I am open to that.
jmapb (2025-06-25 20:56:55+00:00): Recent photos at https://jmapb.github.io/hilton_holiday_gardens/

I was snapping a pic of the path so I could add it later (which I did) but I wondered if this area would merit some additional designation. Still not a park imo; landuse=recreation_ground seems the closest well-known tag. (Wouldn't conflict with natural=scrub if you think that still applies.)
daniel_solow (2025-06-26 19:33:46+00:00): I think that's fair but what could you use that land for? Scavenger hunt or geocaching perhaps! :D
DressyPear4 (2021-09-21 16:31:14+00:00): Olá, vias não devem ser sobrepostas, adicione um nó nas intercessões
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111502345
wireguy (2021-09-21 16:07:12+00:00): HI Jocelyne, welcome to OSM!
Thanks for the additions. I made a few corrections.   OSM doesn't use abbreviations, like S for South or Rd for Road, so I expanded them.  Time is also on a 24 hour clock, so I changed 4pm to 16:00.  

If you have any questions, just ask.
Keep on mapping!
salve100 (2021-09-21 15:55:55+00:00): Partes de la zona residencial de las arboledas es sacada de la informacion de la INE ya que es dificil precisar donde termina la zona residencial.
user_2066394 (2021-09-23 08:59:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/347009594
Wurde die Hausnummer bewusst verschoben oder war das versehentlich?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-12 10:11:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9111335269/history has shop = accessories that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=accessories ? What kind of accwessories are sold here? Fashion accessories? Car parts? Gun accessories?

Maybe use shop=fashion_accessories for clothing accessories, shop=car_parts for car accessories or other shop=* instead - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Daccessories
4004 (2021-09-26 23:15:26+00:00): hi, thanks for the edit. from what I can see, it's an unpaved informal path that is somewhat straighter than your version - do you have any other data you based this on apart from maxar?
Anoesis (2021-09-27 17:12:00+00:00): @4004 thank you for the message, good eye on that. I just updated it with a minor adjustment to align/straighten  the footpath and connecting way
4004 (2021-09-27 21:56:43+00:00): thanks!
fayor (2021-09-21 19:28:07+00:00): Ti sbagli

https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/vittorio-emanuele-dabormida_(Dizionario-Biografico)/
gscholz (2021-12-12 06:21:57+00:00): Hi Aldana,
ths changeset has added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines, wrong roles for relation items and so on:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-68.14360&lat=-38.93349&zoom=16&opacity=0.54

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111504540

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
miche101 (2021-09-21 16:41:50+00:00): Danke nochmal.. hab mich durchgeackert ;)
map per (2021-10-20 19:17:29+00:00): Hallo DocJoschi,

überlappende Gebäude sind in OSM nicht erlaubt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985566469). Und was bedeutet FRM die Nummer 5222?

Viele Grüße
map per
DocJoschi (2021-10-21 23:06:21+00:00): Die Überlappung habe ich entfent. 

Die Nummer 5222 ist die für dieses Gebäude vom Bauamt vergebene Gebäudenummer auf dem Campus

Joschi
map per (2021-10-22 11:23:00+00:00): Hallo Joschi,

die Gebäudenummern sollten in OSM nicht als name=*, sondern als ref=* (Referenznummer) eingetragen werden. In ID geht das unter Bearbeite Objekt -> Eigenschaften. In diesem Fall also:
name=FRM Zugangsgebäude
ref=5222

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2021-10-27 18:31:54+00:00): Hab die Gebäudenamen korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
map per
skyper (2021-10-09 00:52:43+00:00): Hello Viki_travel_weak
Your CS comment mentions removing relations but you just damage the relation. Is there a general u-Turnn allowed? The relation looked quite valid and turn restrictions with one or more via ways are valid.
On day later, your college deleted the relation for good:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111549805.
Would you please restore the relation again.
Thanks skyper
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-20 11:19:53+00:00): Hello skyper, 
sorry for my long answer, was on vacation and couldn't answer. I see my colleagues have fixed this problem for me. We have research this case and it is a pity that we got confused a little, the human factor influenced. Next time let's do revert changeset.  
Thank you very much for your comments, they are very helpful to us!
skyper (2021-10-21 11:55:06+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
Hope you enjoyed your holidays.
I usually do not revert without answer, except when ignored.
Only reverting some examples does not do the job and myself has neither the man power nor the will to checkout all the individual CS to revert them.
Another problem is the fact that the relations are broken so reverting does only have the job.
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate it that you care about turn-relations as many are broken and many are missing but we have a problem with the tools you use and with the complexity that iD damaged a lot months/years ago.

Take care
skyper
alexey_zakharenkov (2021-09-21 21:28:43+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Теги школ и других организаций, имеющих свою отрисованную территорию, ставятся на территорию. Здесь так и было сделано. Поправьте, пожалуйста. Для сокращения больше подойдёт тег short_name.
PT-53 (2021-09-25 05:33:33+00:00): Hallo JuangDse,
Du hast diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985572992/history
neu eingezeichnet. Da fehlen noch die Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
PT-53 (2021-10-10 11:13:09+00:00): gelöscht
Gonéo (2021-09-22 12:38:38+00:00): Bonjour, pour faire suite à la demande de révision :
1. D'après le cadastre c'est suite du chemin de la Sapinière et non l'autre chemin à l'EST qui serait plutôt une route de service.
2. Les adresses au 15a et 15b sont indiquées sur l'impasse de la Sapinière, ce qui ne correspond pas au cadastre. Mais peut-être à la réalité ?
marc__marc (2023-04-29 00:24:14+00:00): Bonjour,
que veuxx dire bicycle=permissive sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687740801 ?
normalement le tag veux dire que c'est un lieu oü le propriétaire laisser passer les vélos mais a le droit de changer d'avis (typiquement un chemin qui passe par une propriété privée
mais avec un escalier ? il y a une rampe ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Jorisbo (2023-05-01 05:41:11+00:00): Hello Marc !  Thx for your question. I only changed the value 'tolerated' to the common translation 'permissive' . I don't know if there is a ramp. Normally stairs/steps are not used by bicycle's of course. Kind regards, Joris
marc__marc (2023-05-01 11:35:59+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the feedback, you're right, I had the wrong contributor, thanks for pointing it out.
Regards,
Marc
AnonymousAlligator (2021-09-28 02:30:30+00:00): Hi, thanks for your work improving the New Orleans area!

It seems to me like man_made=dyke would fit better here, what do you think? <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Ddyke>
JJJWegdam (2021-09-28 04:06:59+00:00): Hello,

You’re welcome. The tag man_made=dyke is an abandoned proposal, as far as I can see. I used man_made=embankment as second-best option, while a better tag is lacking
AnonymousAlligator (2021-09-29 15:10:01+00:00): There was an abandoned proposal, but the wiki says it's "de facto" now. Also, the embankment page says to prefer dyke when the primary function is flood protection.
JJJWegdam (2021-09-29 19:00:01+00:00): The fact that it’s an abandoned proposal coincides (and might relate) with the tag not being rendered by most of the maps. Not really motivating to choose for such a tag (especially as the embankment tag is not wrong).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-24 20:21:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121444006 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some vandalism (some time ago) in Azerbaijan.
eggie (2021-09-21 18:46:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-24 20:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121444006 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some vandalism (some time ago) in Azerbaijan.
eggie (2021-09-21 18:56:09+00:00): JASMein, Best lastig al die tags.
building apartments hoort niet op een node. Dat geeft een foutmelding.
De BAG adesnode heb ik samengevoegd met deze adresnode. 
Er staan wel erg veel aparte tags op deze node;  shop=yes? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-21 19:16:48+00:00): Tip Gebruik deze tool voor de juiste format openingstijden
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?oh=Mo-Fr%2009:00-23:00;%20Sa,Su%2009:00-21:00
Ik heb wat aangepast.
gr eggie
JASMein03M (2021-09-21 21:18:16+00:00): ah, die tool is erg handig bedankt voor de tip. ik heb nu meteen dan ook bijzondere tijden toegevoegd.

en over de shop=yes, ja ik weet niet hoe ik dat anders aan zou moeten geven, maar de sportlocatie heeft een winkel met sportartikelen, evenals een bar en een terras. maar wrs moet ik dat dan op een andere manier aangeven
JASMein03M (2021-09-21 21:24:40+00:00): en is er toevallig ook een manier waardoor je verschillende tarieven kan toevoegen?
eggie (2021-09-22 04:51:52+00:00): Dat laatste even geen idee.. vraagje voor het forum denk ik. Dan komt er vast wel een suggestie.
Laat shop=yes maar staan. De validator zegt alleen =yes is niet specifiek.
Gr eggie
PT-53 (2021-09-22 15:57:16+00:00): Hallo Karthoo,
ich habe Deine Änderung auf diesem Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699237285/history
von 
highway=service
auf
highway=path
zurückgesetzt.

Dort können und dürfen Anlieger mit 2-spurigen KFZ fahren!!!
Karthoo (2021-09-22 16:04:49+00:00): Alles klar, bin davon ausgegangen, dass Wege mit VZ 240 generell als highway=path getaggt werden, da mir noch nie ein anderer Fall begegnet ist. Aber in dem Fall ist die Straße ja wirklich recht breit
Buraddo (2021-09-22 08:04:46+00:00): Hello,
Are there any markings on this route?
I would like to add them to OSM if you have more information.
Draceane (2021-09-22 09:07:11+00:00): Hi, we have encountered some new markings (I assume from 2020) around Negovanu and Steflesti peaks but I cannot recall the exact places. It was quite strange, just discontinuous parts of the path were marked.

I will add some details, but I have to look to my notes and photos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-22 17:28:43+00:00): Hello!

You used
utility=power;1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9044408700/history

Have you maybe meant
utility=power
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
cvieira (2024-05-22 18:52:14+00:00): I'm actually not sure why that 1 is there. I just used the default ID editor interface. I don't recall adding a 1, so I'd imagine it's just a quirk of the editor that has since been updated. In any case, it should be safe to remove.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-25 02:51:41+00:00): I fixed it then (I suspect that you pressed 1 button by accident - but either way it is fixed here now)
BCNorwich (2021-09-22 08:37:01+00:00): Hi, Could I please explain that when an area outline is also tagged as a barrier like barrier=hedge with landuse=farmland. Then it is not possible to remove parts of the hedge that don't actually exist, like field entrances and tracks. The hedges don't go across entrances or tracks. Also this results in some hedge barriers being duplicated. I also see that hedges have been joined onto or extended to meet highway center lines, this surely isn't reality.

Could you please consider mapping the hedges separately on top of the relevant farmland outline?

I've amended lots of features in this changeset and the area this in Changeset: 111530559

Regards Bernard.
A127 (2021-10-13 13:26:57+00:00): Wegen die elkaar fysiek kruisen zoals de oversteekplaatsen aan het eind van de Broekbosstraat in Kontich-Kazerne, moeten worden ingetekend met een gemeenschappelijke knoop. Bedankt om dit nog aan te passen.
treestryder (2021-09-21 22:31:26+00:00): You have put a building inside of a building. This will need to be corrected. If you need help, please reach out for it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111509540
Dimitar155 (2021-09-21 18:30:36+00:00): The imagery I used is Bing
baumann3141 (2021-09-21 20:11:58+00:00): You are adding a building on top of an an already mapped building. If you want to add a business to an existing building, you should add a node with the business information.
treestryder (2021-09-21 22:24:08+00:00): I see you have been doing this in multiple locations. And in this particular location, there is already a node for the MSU Dairy Store. Was there a reason for this, like maybe it isn't showing in a particular view you are seeing?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111509684
Impulsu (2021-09-21 18:46:23+00:00): Please rectify your buildings before upload by pressing the key Q.
Foonline (2021-09-23 21:27:22+00:00): Hallo,
ist der Laden TAZELO umgezogen oder ist dieser Punkt evtl versehentlich falsch gesetzt?
pbnoxious (2021-09-22 07:53:35+00:00): Hi,
nachdem du dich um die Brücke am Stirnweg gekümmert hast: da sind die Fahrspuren baulich nicht getrennt, es sollte also eigentlich nur ein "way" für beide Seiten benutzt werden. (das macht auch die Kreuzung mit Am Kavalleriesand weniger hässlich).

Im Haardtring gilt eigentlich das gleiche, aber da muss man wohl etwas mehr arbeit rein stecken.

Ich würde das in den nächsten Tagen korrigieren (wenn es dann noch so ist), wollte jetzt aber nicht unabgesprochen einfach direkt deine Änderungen wieder nichtig machen.
Athalis (2021-09-23 07:49:49+00:00): Gude, ich habe nichts dagegen, wenn du hier etwas zusammenfasst. Meistens bin ich auch dafür, ohne physikalischer Trennung Straßen zusammenzufassen.

Hier bin ich auch dafür, bei den Linien 85528428, 108433869 und 627824858 zusammenzufassen. Mir war das in diesem Änderungssatz dann zu viel, ich habe hier versucht, den bestehenden Stil beizubehalten.

Weil du jedoch von der Kreuzung Am Kavalleriesand schreibst: bitte beachte, dass bei den Knoten 9111668251, 8150769032 und  8323878999 sowie node 9111636801 jew. eine physikalische Trennung ist.

Daher wäre ich dafür, die Kreuzungen Am Kavalleriesand & Stirnweg sowie Am Kavalleriesand & Hilpertstraße zu belassen, und vorerst nur die Brücke vom Stirnweg sowie dann den Haardtring zusammenzuführen.
dsaneus (2021-10-01 10:45:42+00:00): Hola. He visto que has estado realizando cambios por la zona de Alcantarilla, y uno de ellos ha sido modificar la LAV Murcia-Almería, actualmente en construcción. El trazado que estaba cartografiado en el mapa estaba obtenido de los proyectos de construcción, por lo que son exactos. Con tu edición, has modificado la línea, perdiendo esa exactitud. Ya he revertido tus cambios, y vuelto a poner la línea tal cual será construida. Te pediría que en el futuro tengas cuidado al modificar vías que aparezcan en construcción, ya que en la mayoría de los casos son trazados reales, y si lo cambias sin tener ninguna referencia, pierde el sentido de tenerlos en OSM.
Un saludo.
~dsaneus
eggie (2021-09-21 19:37:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip.. Je noemt als bron BING... Deze achtergrond licht verschoven. ...maar volgens mij heb je PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 25cm latest gebruikt. Die foto ligt goed.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
WVDSSixhaven (2021-09-22 07:08:47+00:00): Dank voor het warme welkom!
Bron BING stond er al, heb ik (in elk geval niet bewust) toegevoegd, tenzij die met het kopiëren van de steigers meegekomen is.
eggie (2021-09-22 07:14:29+00:00): Oke klopt. BING ligt (typo zie ik nu ..grr) inderdaad verschoven.. maar dat was jarenlang de achtergrond die gebruikt werd. Je kunt de source dus aanpassen. Nu is Pdok de standaard.
Gr eggie
archpdx (2021-10-11 05:54:38+00:00): Just curious - where did you find that map? I could only find this one, which is a little different:
https://wishcamperpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/Beaverton-Summary5.jpg
jhmeniscus (2021-10-11 22:52:06+00:00): @archpdx I used photoshop to combine wireframe outlines in this doc, and then I made a ratified overly on mapwarper.net

https://apps2.beavertonoregon.gov/DevelopmentProjects/ApplicantMaterials/SCM%20Blackbird%20Farms-18485%20SW%20Scholls%20Ferry%20Rd-Plans%20Civil-.pdf
eggie (2021-09-21 19:43:02+00:00): Is de ingang van de haven werkelijk breder geworden. Dit klopt niet met de laatste luchtfoto quick ortho 2021?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-21 19:52:23+00:00): Er zat ergens een fout in het vlak van de twee watervlakken. Nu opgelost. Even de rendering afwachten. Dan zal het water zo terugkomen. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-09-21 20:02:44+00:00): De man_made=reinforced_slope aan de zuidkant van de haven is die wel aanwezig? Het is een edit uit 2014
gr eggie
WVDSSixhaven (2021-09-22 07:07:06+00:00): Afmetingen van de ingang haven is al jaren ongewijzigd (dus niet breder geworden). Wel is er onderhoud gepleegd aan de beschoeiing van het ZW kant haveningang.
De man_made=reinforced_slope is voor zover mij bekend niet aanwezig. Staat ook niet op waterkaarten als 'gevaar'.
gr WVDSSixhaven
eggie (2021-09-22 07:11:03+00:00): Oke... Haal je die zelf weg?
Ziet er verder netjes uit zo.
De haveningang heb ik al  aangepast mbv bgt omtrekgericht en recente luchtfoto..
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2021-09-21 20:20:28+00:00): Dag Three..
Tip.. 
Kijk eens naar editor JOSM
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710    

Daar kun je een plugin draaien die water em landuse voor je kan scheiden.
PolygonCutOut

Ook kun je een achtergrond instellen waar de watervlakken als transparant zijn te zien.
Wat leesvoer..
BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-09-21 20:23:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PolygonCutOut
StefanHRT (2021-09-22 08:23:10+00:00): Hallo, Du könntest noch tactile_paving, crossing_island, surface ergänzen ;) VG
eggie (2021-09-21 20:11:53+00:00): Dag Maussie,

Lijkt me oke, maar je hebt alleen kans dat een andere mapper het weer gaat intekenen, want op de meest recente luchtfoto quick ortho 2021 is alles nog in functie.
Je had het bv kunnen omtaggen naar disused:highway=cycleway. dat rendert dan niet. Verder kun je er dan een note op kwijt met uitleg. 
Nu wordt het in de gaten houden wat een medemapper gaat doen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:highway

MVG
eggie
Maussie (2021-09-21 20:17:43+00:00): Beste eggie, dank voor je reactie.  Zo lk leer iedere keer iets bij, dank daarvoor.  Ik zal het in de gaten houden en indien nodig dan omtaggen naar disused:highway=cycleway.
groeten, Maussie
eggie (2021-09-21 20:22:17+00:00): Dat laatste zou je kunnen doen, want zelf heb ik nu al de neiging om te vertrouwen op een recente luchtfoto.
Mapse
eggie
JeroenHoek (2021-09-21 20:05:23+00:00): Als je zo nauwkeurig met sloten in de weer gaat is het wellicht verstandig eens te kijken naar de JOSM editor in plaats van iD. In JOSM kun je met de BGT-omtrekgericht laag veel eenvoudiger de randen van de sloten zien:

https://postimg.cc/FYDzNbpz

Ook werkt het een stuk ergonomischer dan in de browser.

Meer informatie over JOSM vindt je ook op het Nederlandstalige forum, hier bijvoorbeeld:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644