piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-14 18:46:42+00:00): Hi LHSGolfer, welcome to OSM. 

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69191905
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-14 18:45:56+00:00): Hi LHSGolfer, welcome to OSM. 

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Furthermore, may I know the reason behind deleting several footways, which are visible in the satellite imagery? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69192096
LHSGolfer (2019-04-14 20:41:15+00:00): If I'm correctly assuming what you are discussing, these are golf cart paths and not foot ways. In the future I will not delete and redraw objects. If you could clarify what section you are talking about I could gladly explain. I edited almost the entire course for more accuracy, but I may have made a mistake.
Supaplex (2019-08-09 15:23:09+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
stevea (2019-04-14 22:55:32+00:00): I'm curious from where you obtained the address of this house (way/35263575).  The address is actually 2-3920, not 23920, following a long-standing post office convention in the area when Cliff Drive was split into E Cliff (mostly) in the unincorporated county and W Cliff in the city of Santa Cruz.  (Of prefixing addresses on E Cliff with 2- before a further number, which was the old address).

I ask as it is possible your source is incorrect and it may be possible to correct.
gooney (2019-04-20 15:41:22+00:00): Interesting, I verified the address as 23920 on multiple realtor websites. I checked google street view and the address on the front says 23920 but other homes along this stretch do start with the 2-"xxxx" naming convention. I have changed the address to reflect 2-3920 for now. Thanks Steve
stevea (2019-04-20 17:42:56+00:00): You are welcome; thanks for the positive experience and making our map better.
stevea (2019-04-20 17:45:59+00:00): BTW, please don't use Google (maps or StreetView) as a source for data which enter OSM:  that is a violation of our Open Database License (ODbL), which you agreed to in the Contributor Terms when you joined OSM.

I'll say it again as the "front page" of our wiki does:  two (official?) rules of OSM are 1):  Don't copy from other maps, and 2):  Have fun!
mueschel (2019-04-15 17:48:35+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You used some tags like "CIGARERRIA Y AGENCIA=LA REINA" in your edits.
This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the menues in the editor should be used.

Would you mind checking these tags and change them to documented ones? 
In this case "shop = tobacco" would be the correct one:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtobacco

Let us (e.g. on the forums) know if you need help!
Skippern (2019-04-14 11:49:47+00:00): Ponto de ônibus a frente do condomínio geralmente tem o mesmo nome como o condomínio. Pode ser notando nas placas, no site do CETURB, ou outros fontes. Favor não apaga nomes nos pontos ônibus sem refer esses sites.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69192620
4joao (2019-04-16 13:36:49+00:00): Grato pela correção, muito bem aplicado. Obrigado
aharvey (2019-05-03 09:21:27+00:00): Hey there, I noticed you changed parts of the M2 from cycleway=lane to cycleway=shoulder. Cycleway=lane is where there is a dedicated and signposted bicycle infrastructure (which there is on parts of the M2). Is there a good reason why that shouldn't be used here?
yue_dongchen (2019-05-03 10:10:41+00:00): Hi aharvey. First, despite having bicycle markings, the M2 shoulders aren't legally cycle lanes (refer to the road rules for proper cycleway signage). Also, cycleway=* is usually used by auto routers and thus, cycleway=shoulder provides differentiation between motorway shoulders and cycle lanes on local streets. Hope it helps.
aharvey (2019-05-03 10:46:17+00:00): It's been discussed in the past, and at the time I think the consensus was that the legal definition doesn't influence tagging, what's on the ground does whether it meets the legal definition or not. That's my view,  that so long as it looks like a cycle lane, is used as a cycle lane, matches the generally accepted definition of a cycle lane, then it's a cycleway=lane.

cycleway=shoulder doesn't provide differentiation between motorway shoulders and cycle lanes on local streets, you can have cycleway=shoulder on local streets and cycleway=lane on motorways, it's the highway tag which provides the differentiation cyclelanes on motorway and local streets.
yue_dongchen (2019-05-03 10:52:16+00:00): Hi. Motorway shoulders are legally different from cycle lanes and also have different safety levels. The openstreetmap wiki says: cycleway=lane: Used for shoulders that are navigable and legal to cycle on, where a high-speed road is legal but not useful infrastructure. Often a sign designates the road as such, e.g. "Motor Vehicles and Bicycles Only."
aharvey (2019-05-03 11:03:11+00:00): I always assumed that description for the cycleway=shoulder tag only applied when it wasn't already a marker lanes for bicycles. ie. cycleway=shoulder implied there is no bicycle marketing, and no cycleway, just that there is a shoulder there which conveniently works as a path for bicycles to use.

If we don't use cycleway=lane, then we must also use bicycle=designated on to the motorway to distinguish this signposted for bicycles shoulder from a regular shoulder not signposted for bicycles.
yue_dongchen (2019-05-03 11:10:56+00:00): Hi aharvey, cycleway=lane doesn't eliminate the need for bicycle=designated, they're seperate tags. The routability of motorways can be determined by auto routers.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-04-20 01:04:41+00:00): سلام دوست گرامی
شما در در دو چنجست
69193419
69193607
اقدام به حذف دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، مجموعه ورزشی مس کرمان، دانشگاه پردیزه کرمان و بیمارستان افضلی پور کرمان کردین (البته بیمارستان رو دوباره رسم کردین) نمیدونم هدفتون از این کار چی بوده ولی ظاهراً سعی داشتین دیوارهای مشترک این مجموعه ها رو به دیوارهای غیر مشترک اونا بچسبونین و بصورت یکپارچه در بیارین که کار صد در صد اشتباهی بوده. دوست عزیز اگر به مباحث او اس ام الی خصوص ریلیشنها اشراف کافی ندارین لطفاً دیتای موجود رو دستکاری نکنین و خیلی راحت اقدام به حذف زحماتی که سایرین برای نقشه کشیدن نکنین. مطمئناً برای هیچ کاربری خوشایند نیست که ببینه زحماتش توسط شخص دیگری از بین رفته. 
ممنون که ژرف می اندیشید و توجه میفرمایید.
itsfreetux (2019-04-20 01:33:42+00:00): What are you doing man?do you want destroy the map?
Ebrahim Nejati (2019-04-20 01:54:17+00:00): It's a good news afterall which this changest has been detected and perverted. Any similar action only ruins the hours of hard work on the data nevertheless done undeliberately.
Imanmoghimi (2019-04-20 02:09:37+00:00): سلام
ظاهرا شما اقدام به حذف بعضی عوارض و رلیشن ها در نقشه کرمان کردید و بدون توجه به اخطار های ادیتورتون این تغییرات رو ثبت هم  کردید لطفا در این موارد تا اطلاع درستی از منطقه ندارید ویرایش انجام ندید و قبل از ویرایش با ادیتور های محلی مشورت کنید 
این موارد در چنجست 69193607 نیز وجود دارن
با تشکر
sasanrst (2019-04-20 06:18:18+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز
شما اقدام به حذف 218 آیتم کردید و این تغییرات ثبت شده
لطفا در ادیتهاتون دقت کافی داشته باشید و مکان هایی که اطلاعی از وضعیت دقیق آن ندارید رو با افراد محلی مشورت کنید در غیر این صورت زحمات بقیه رو از بین بردید
Osm1980 (2019-04-20 13:38:50+00:00):  سلام رسم  و ویرایش با وسپوچی در بسیاری موارد
چون تسلطی روش نیست سهوا در ویرایش ایجاد اشکال میکنه 
 و باعث نقیصه میشه اگه امکان داره از این دو نرم افزار استفاده بشه بهتره
Josm
ID
moreno96 (2019-04-21 08:16:44+00:00): Hello.
You have removed some important features in Iran map. Be careful, you should contribute to OSM according to the rules of the OSM wiki.
Dimacn (2019-04-20 04:32:20+00:00): Что значит временно!? Исправляю за вами последний раз. Если вы не прекратите свои вандальные правки, в следующий вы будете забанены.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-04-20 01:05:07+00:00): سلام دوست گرامی
شما در در دو چنجست
69193419
69193607
اقدام به حذف دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، مجموعه ورزشی مس کرمان، دانشگاه پردیزه کرمان و بیمارستان افضلی پور کرمان کردین (البته بیمارستان رو دوباره رسم کردین) نمیدونم هدفتون از این کار چی بوده ولی ظاهراً سعی داشتین دیوارهای مشترک این مجموعه ها رو به دیوارهای غیر مشترک اونا بچسبونین و بصورت یکپارچه در بیارین که کار صد در صد اشتباهی بوده. دوست عزیز اگر به مباحث او اس ام الی خصوص ریلیشنها اشراف کافی ندارین لطفاً دیتای موجود رو دستکاری نکنین و خیلی راحت اقدام به حذف زحماتی که سایرین برای نقشه کشیدن نکنین. مطمئناً برای هیچ کاربری خوشایند نیست که ببینه زحماتش توسط شخص دیگری از بین رفته. 
ممنون که ژرف می اندیشید و توجه میفرمایید.
itsfreetux (2019-04-20 01:37:43+00:00): You have removed a lot of data in this changeset, please be careful
sasanrst (2019-04-20 06:22:32+00:00): دوست عزیز خواهشا در ترسیم هاتون دقت کافی به خرج بدبد
اینجا هم 31 آیتم را حذف کرده اید. 
شما وقتی یک ریلیشن را از نقشه حذف میکنید آیتم های مختلفی با آن حذف میشوند و نقشه کاملا بهم میریزه
لطفا دقت بفرمایید
bielebog (2019-04-15 10:45:42+00:00): Da hier review_requested=yes gesetzt ist – um was soll es sich bei der Firma "Ehrenmäner" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6403453819 handeln?
Falls das nur ein Spass-Edit sein sollte, lösch' es doch bitte wieder.

Danke
bielebog (2019-04-16 22:18:07+00:00): Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69288849 reverted
Verdy_p (2019-04-14 13:41:19+00:00): stop, updates are ongoing you just create more conflicts
Andre68 (2019-04-14 21:48:46+00:00): No! It's YOU who is creating BAD or INCONSISTENT coastlines!!! STOP DOING so!!! If you want to improve coastlines the ONLY refine existing ones or split them up.
Verdy_p (2019-04-19 02:27:06+00:00): you've interfered with an ongoing update, there was NO inconsistant lines, you deleted items that were uploaded and created many errors later on in the upload.
I was really fixing them.
The ongoing upload was visible.
I had to restore the lines you incorrectly removed becau_se you created holes.
Verdy_p (2019-04-19 02:28:37+00:00): Yes there wxere incosistencies even before I startd the upload exactly to fix them.
I detected them as I fixed man,y broken polygons in the French Antillas while creating the marine natural park.
I always check ALL dependencies
Tomas Straupis (2019-04-14 15:29:19+00:00): Atšauktas kelių perklasifikavimas. Kaip minėjau anksčiau, reikia pradžioje pasiskaityti apie klasifikavimą. (Arba klausti talk-lt sąraše, arba klausti tiesiai manęs)
abakus_uploader (2019-04-14 22:30:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
nevw (2019-04-14 10:33:08+00:00): Hi
you appear to have changed the residential area of Tarpeena from residential to commercial and tagged one of the residential houses as "Smith's Food and Drug" and a place of worship.
As this is a public map, can you amend your errant ways and the map.
nevw (2019-04-14 12:06:54+00:00): Thanks for fixing, but keep on mapping.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-07 04:24:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 69955624, 69954181, 69956297, 69953607, 69958113, 69957134 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2743 etc..
eggie (2019-04-14 09:46:02+00:00): Hi.. It's better not to start with access=no  only if a sign tells you entrance  it's not allowed. 
Gr Eggie
santamariense (2019-04-14 16:38:07+00:00): Hi. Why did you delete it? To fix isn't the same as to delete. Ok, I know it wasn't correctly mapped because it was an incomplete multipolygon, but is a very specific information that comes from deep research on laws. It's so easy delete things in OSM compared to how hard is to find so specific information here in Brazil. (←That's to think about)  
In spite of everything, you accidentally deleted a misplaced object on map. The correctly one is this ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256806341 ), so... thank you. lol
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69196687
gscholz (2019-04-20 07:20:28+00:00): Hi  santamariense,
if you enter broken data into the OSM database an you know this is the case, then I recommend to add a note like "This is only a temporary solution and will be fixed in short term" so every contributor has a chance to get aware of it. But better than to enter just errors may be to write it down on paper and add new items when the data is complete and does not have any errors.
Guido
Martin Borsje (2019-04-14 18:00:27+00:00): Hallo

Je hebt op het pad access=no gezet. Dit is meestal geen goed begin; alleen als er een art 461 staa. Een pad is default toegankelijk voor voetgangers en fietsers.
De Calvariekapel was al gemat daar; ik weet niet wat je bedoeld hebt met de extra tags
area=yes
description=Rijksmonument since 1967 and build in 1829.

name=Calvariekapel
wikidata=Q3359585
wikipedia=nl:Calvariekapel (Houthem)

Ik zal die op de kapelnode zetten.

Ik zal ook het toegangspaadje mappen

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69209923#map=16/50.8803/5.7916
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-25 00:26:18+00:00): سلام ضمن تقدیر و تشکر از زحمات شما
در مورد میدان شهید خلعتبری
طبق قوانین ویکی، نام روی تابلو در برچسب name و اگر نام طولانی بود میتوان در برچسب short name کوتاه شده آن را اضافه کرد. همچنین عبارت لشکر اصلاح شد.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-02 18:31:52+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید ماکسیم. در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
tux67 (2019-04-14 09:41:26+00:00): sollte da noch ein fixme=Gebäudeumriss geschätzt, aktualisieren sobald Luftbild verfügbar dran? Oder was ist deine Quelle?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Markiere_deine_Sch.C3.A4tzungen
Für Mitmapper wäre es immer gut das source field bei iD (oder jedem anderen Editor) zu nutzen - und wenns nur "local knowedge" ist.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69196887
johasch (2019-04-15 15:37:19+00:00): Hallo tux67,
fixme ist nachgetragen.
Gruß
johasch
Sosha1996 (2019-05-02 18:31:56+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید ماکسیم. در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2019-04-14 09:49:02+00:00): Hi.. water mapped on forest will result in trees swimming in the water. 
You need to fix that with a inner multipolygon
The forest will be the outer. 
Gr. Eggie
eggie (2019-04-14 10:52:07+00:00): fixed with multipolygon
Sosha1996 (2019-05-02 18:31:58+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید ماکسیم. در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2019-04-14 09:52:28+00:00): Hi.. better to remove access=no 
If cycling is not allowed add vehicle=no
Gr Eggie
woodpeck (2019-04-14 10:49:03+00:00): Hallo rab, I assume that your "5833" is a reference to a HOT project but it is not obvious; can you make this clearer in your changeset comments? Also, can you explain why you are "reworking" something here - what are the issues you are fixing? If these are systematic problems, where the same mistake is made regularly, have you made an attempt to reach out to the mapper(s) responsible?
rab (2019-04-14 12:21:22+00:00): Hallo Frederik,

Instructions taken from Project #5923:

"Please connect "floating" bits of highway or paths to the road network as appropriate.

Check that highway/waterway crossings are correctly drawn and tagged with bridge=yes + layer=1 / tunnel=culvert + layer=-1/ ford=yes.

Where possible try to ensure that roads do continue in a logical manner instead of going off onto side roads, this makes it difficult for routing software.

Check the classification of roads.... an unclassified road is one that local traffic would use to reach scattered farm communities and traverse through the rural area but not for short access roads to individual buildings."

That's in principle what I am doing here. I would leave it to HOT if one could show me only one place where their Tasking manager process ever led to satisfying results.
woodpeck (2019-04-14 12:45:10+00:00): So you are saying that when you "re-work" something you are ensuring that the data conforms to the instructions you quoted, and that the mappers using the tasking manager disregard these instructions?
rab (2019-04-15 15:51:15+00:00): Let's do a reality check.
There are high priority tasks where validated tiles looks like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/11.51547/-13.93504
And there are way to many forgotten projects, left like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-15.85369/35.51667
A more recent one with similar instructions: 
https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/5923?task=125
...
woodpeck (2019-04-16 09:23:09+00:00): The areas you have highlighted are clearly low-quality mapping, and it is certainly worth analyzing and discussing whether the processes and funding model of HOT are currently adequate to create mapping with any long-term benefit. However, this was not what I was asking. My main point is that I would like you to write more accurate changeset comments. "Re-work 1234" doesn't really help a lot, because nobody knows what 1234 is, and nobody knows what you mean by "re-work". You could write "improve road classification" or "correct building geometries" or "remove invalid landuses". Or, if you desperately want to express your opinion on HOT's mapping quality, you can also write "Making sure this tile actually conforms to the instructions given in [URL] - it should never have been validated like that" or so. But a factual statement on what you're doing would be best, and if done well could also be helpful for the mappers whose mi stakes you are fixing. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
BCNorwich (2019-04-14 11:17:49+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've made a few amendments to the tagging of your new golfing additions to OSM, this is in order to conform with OSM practices. Please see here :-https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

Well Done, Regards Bernard
muralito (2019-07-10 14:30:22+00:00): Hi Andre68.

When you fix the coastline like in this change, plaese add to the map the body of water that was previously represented by the coastline. Thanks.

Regards,
M.
gpstracks (2019-04-14 12:17:56+00:00): Buongiorno.
Ho (di nuovo) corretto.
Ti invito gentilmente a seguie le indicazioni sull'uso della chiave "name"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
TravGW (2019-04-15 18:25:56+00:00): Reverted. Before tagging future casinos, please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcasino
eggie (2019-04-14 11:28:35+00:00): replaced religion=christian in stead of catholic at node. 
area = yes is not a proper tag. It's dilicated tagging and has no effect in OSM
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-14 11:30:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=place%20of%20worship?uselang=nl
TravGW (2019-04-15 18:26:05+00:00): Reverted. Before tagging future casinos, please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcasino
maraf24 (2019-04-14 11:57:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69199860
Baloo Uriza (2019-04-17 02:26:44+00:00): Not sure which building this belongs to but I definitely question the copyright of the geocoder used.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69199484
euryoekie (2020-06-04 07:15:16+00:00): Hallo,
auf dem GPS (OSM) ist eine Unterbrechung des Radweges eingetragen über den Berliner Ring. Bitte prüfen. Die Navigation hat eine Unterbrechung und leitet einen immer über die nächste Autobahnanschlussstelle Glindow.
Andre
eggie (2019-04-14 12:43:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tomas Straupis (2019-04-14 15:09:23+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas. Pieva - yra konkretus aprašymas, ką toje vietoje matome ant žemės. Parkas - yra virtualus ploto naudojimo apibrėžimas, t.y. parke bus ir pievos, ir miškai, ir tvenkiniai ir dar daug kas.
eggie (2019-04-14 11:37:15+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there.
Combined your extra info with adressnode

Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-07-21 13:22:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72482817 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some obvious vandalism in Moldova.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72211498 for more details.
eggie (2019-04-14 11:39:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Svp geen adressen aan gebouwen toevoegen.
Deze worden geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster en zijn al aanwezig op de adresnodes.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-14 11:41:48+00:00): Dag Ed,

Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot. Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-14 11:47:57+00:00): Duplikaat adressen verwijderd.
eggie (2019-04-14 11:53:37+00:00): Why persisting in adding a duplicated tag? Bij Marc is already tagged!
Eggie
smootheFiets (2021-01-09 17:44:26+00:00): Hoi Leonmvd,
Dit picknicktafeltje heb ik niet gezien tijdens een survey een paar weken terug (heb ook niet eernaar gezocht). Ligt het misschien ergens verstopt? Dan zou het handig zijn om nog een toegangspadje in te tekenen. Of ligt het elders?
Groeten, smootheFiets
Leonmvd (2021-01-09 17:47:16+00:00): Hoi! Dat zou ik zo niet meer weten. Misschien alleen zomers? Als het nu niet zichtbaar was zou ik het verwijderen
smootheFiets (2021-01-09 17:54:36+00:00): Nog even nagekeken, hier zie ik het wel: https://goo.gl/maps/T3A5YNxx9AHCttvJ6 Maar ja, het is maar Google. Verklaart wel waarom ik niets heb gezien toen ik erlangs fietste. 
Ik doe maar lekker niks. Sorry for the noise!
jonasbits (2019-04-14 11:36:12+00:00): Sitter vid balkongen och jämför och kollar även på http://web.wagnerguide.com/2.1/ostersundLibrary.aspx?Lang=sv kartan