piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Антон-1983 (2021-12-05 09:57:17+00:00): Ну если хозпостройки очень интересные и отмечены даже на Глобусе Беларуси, то считаю их достопримечательностью
4004 (2021-12-06 09:41:37+00:00): на глобусе, вполне возможно, устаревшие данные. насколько я знаю, после реконструкции эти постройки никакого интереса из себя не представляют.
ну и так же достопримечательностью уже отмечен весь фальварак
Антон-1983 (2021-12-10 21:12:46+00:00): Вот чтобы действительно исторически ценные здания отличить от новоделов я и расставил точки достопримечательностей. Увы(
4004 (2021-12-10 23:16:27+00:00): просите, вы хотите сказать, что видели эти здания и визуально их можно отнести к историческим?
eggie (2021-11-03 17:02:26+00:00): Dag Groenius..
Voorop gesteld. "Ik ben geen bomenmapper''. 
Wellicht heb je hier iets aan
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:diameter#Trees

'k Twijfel of je 'meter' wel voluit moet uitschrijven.
Geen m  of m.  zoals in de wiki wordt genoemd? 
MVG
eggie
Famlam (2022-03-10 21:51:23+00:00): Klopt, eenheden voluit schrijven is "highly discouraged" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features/Units
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 17:35:23+00:00): Hello Pankok and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It looks like you've accidentally changed a hotel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/956569746/history into a park.  Have you any idea how that might have happened?
Best Regards,
Andy
Marek-M (2024-02-01 18:16:11+00:00): Czy ta Gryfa Pomorskiego musi być rozdzielona na dwie jezdnie? Skoro z każdej z jezdni można zjeżdżać na przyległe posesje, to aż się prosi aby zrobić tą drogę za pomocą 1 linii. Co daje to rozdzielenie oprócz dodatkowych skrzyżowań?
https://i.imgur.com/tojVtBa.png
itineris (2022-01-02 14:53:12+00:00): Szia!

Véletlenül törölted útdíjas szakaszok végpontjait. Kérlek, legközelebb jobban figyelj oda!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
efi99 (2022-01-02 14:59:04+00:00): Ok, kösz.
nmombo12 (2021-11-04 16:24:24+00:00): Thanks very much, nice work here.

Noah
GoatoftheNorth (2021-11-03 17:01:32+00:00): Correction: source used was Maxar Premium Imagery, Mapillary
nabilersyad (2021-11-07 05:47:32+00:00): Will you be updating the public_tranport relations too? 
I notice at Kwasa Sentral it's still SBK05 not KG05
angys (2021-11-07 05:50:50+00:00): You can change for the rail code, telation will come up later (after visit to MRT2 physically)
CjMalone (2022-03-28 12:36:43+00:00): Hey, just seen this.

No, it doesn't look like you added it to the relation in this, but I'm considering deleting the relation, or removing the individual points from the relation. It's not the kind of data OSM usually stores.
Allison P (2022-01-07 21:42:52+00:00): Please expand the street suffixes.
GinaroZ (2021-12-23 22:29:19+00:00): Just wondering, what was the reason for adding oneway:bicycle=no here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7982333/history
GinaroZ (2022-08-24 10:57:57+00:00): reverted
tux67 (2021-11-04 08:09:48+00:00): Hi, ich würde hier vorschlagen Namen, Operator website) an den Landuse zu mappen.
Zusammen mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:produce
produce=vegetables
vegetable=asparagus

Bei der Addresse .. ist das wirklich (vor Ort) das Gebäude mit der Hausnummer dran?
Das Luftbild von Anfang des Jahres soeht nach weitern Gebäuden zu come aus.
Wenn du nicht sicher bist, dann sollte ein fixme an das Gebäude mit dem Hinweis das noch mal zu überprüfen (entweder vor Ort, oder wenn die ALKIS daten verfügbar sind.)

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113343589
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
GinaroZ (2021-12-08 17:54:51+00:00): What's the reason for removing the cycleway=opposite_lane from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463491072/history?
ThatEffingCat (2021-12-10 23:32:33+00:00): I think it's no longer a one way street
GinaroZ (2021-12-11 12:39:06+00:00): So it's now two way for all vehicles? Because the previous tagging meant it was only two way for bikes+buses.
ThatEffingCat (2021-12-11 17:03:36+00:00): Feel free to revert it back for now, I'll clarify with another survey
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
jqngarcia (2021-11-04 06:34:44+00:00): Buenos Días, Marcos, veo que editas edificios con asbestos, gracias por la aportación, únicamente decirte que el uso del nombre al edificio no es correcto.
Puedes rectificar?

Salud y Mapas, JQN
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
mueschel (2024-05-05 17:15:25+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag socket:gb-t20234 on 3 charging points. This tag is not used in other places. Could you check if these are socket:gb_ac or socket:gb_dc?
JuanMelo (2024-05-08 20:14:23+00:00): Hello, I did not create those Tags, I just made some edits to the feature. In the history it seems to be our friend AngocA: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AngocA , perhaps he can tell you the meaning of these Tag.
¡Greetings!
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
stefanct (2021-11-29 12:38:14+00:00): Hi, nachdem du den Namen wieder an die Container der WL gemacht hast, bitte hier erklären warum: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2648527
rene78 (2021-11-03 19:34:54+00:00): Gonna need some time to work on this changeset. Please don't delete seemingly empty nodes. Will fix all that. Thanks!
philippec (2021-12-19 16:13:21+00:00): "update", ik bedoel Antwerpen, Meir drinkwaterfonteintje.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3677624262
Zou het kunnen dat het er niet meer staat ?  Of staat het temidden het terras van Panos ?  Het staat nog op de stadslagen van Antwerpen.  Aquaflanders is ontbetrouwbaar als bron.
Rienux (2021-12-20 09:54:52+00:00): geen idee of dit drinkwaterfonteintje er nog staat. ik heb enkel operator:wikidata en operator:wikipedia toegevoegd.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
trigpoint (2021-11-10 23:59:49+00:00): This edit has gone a bit wrong.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204021859 is certainly not a building, it was correctly tagged as a yard, and the name was and still is on the relation. It is certainly not Furrows.

Cheers Phil
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:21:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:21:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-17 13:40:42+00:00): Porque renomeou esta via para sem nome? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130901659/history Se ela não tem nome, deixe em branco.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Lee Carré (2021-11-03 20:43:17+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
redd (2022-02-06 16:27:59+00:00): Hi Ivan,
did you mean "suction_point" instead of "cuction_pint"?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:21:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Lee Carré (2021-11-03 20:43:40+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
canfe (2022-01-13 10:02:18+00:00): La ciclabile essendo pedonale e bici va indicata se è segregated oppure no
4004 (2021-11-22 00:52:07+00:00): 	д.Каролино это все же не название дороги
Антон-1983 (2021-11-24 19:03:43+00:00): на домах д.Каролино д.3. Без слова улица
4004 (2021-11-24 21:13:26+00:00): именно так, поэтому https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr:place
Антон-1983 (2021-11-28 09:27:01+00:00): К сожалению, Вы уже убрали слово д.Каролино. Я могу сказать, что пользуясь навигаторами. И намного лучше когда указана улица "д.Каролино", а в домах указано addr:street=д.Каролино. Всё отлично работает. По addr^place всё очень криво, к сожалению... Везде криво. Я в других деревнях везде ставлю названия деревни и буду так делать впредь.
iWowik (2021-11-28 12:47:43+00:00): Намного лучше, когда таки именно навигаторы понимают правильно внесенные данные.
4004 (2021-11-28 13:51:29+00:00): да, я бы вам порекоммендовал направить свои усилилия на коммуникацию с разработчиками навигаторов.
если каждый будет вносить информацию так, как пожелает, навигаторы никогда не будут работать нормально
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
czubi (2021-11-06 13:26:28+00:00): construction "bedeutet im Bau". HAbs gelöscht und den tower auf einen node geschoben, wenn dich das "Gebäude" stört
datenrebell (2021-11-08 09:48:58+00:00): Kein Problem. Mit ging es um die 3D-Repräsentation des Objectes. Dort wird ein Hochhaus angezeigt, ist aber nur ein Antennenturm.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
eggie (2021-11-03 22:43:30+00:00): Dag Rocket..  Gebouwen tekenen we niet zelf. Het zijn een van de weinige zaken die we periodiek importeren.

Je kunt dat versnellen door een verzoek te doen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Inlog identiek aan OSM account
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-03 22:47:37+00:00): Als voorbeeld  hoe zoiets gaat even aangevraagd 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=845702#p845702

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-05 06:44:42+00:00): Martin.. bedankt voor de import..
Gr eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
streckenkundler (2021-11-03 20:26:36+00:00): Hm... Ich stecke und diesem ÖPNV-Gedöns nicht drin, aber ich würde mir ja eine Lösung wünschen,  bei der man ohne solche Relationskonstrukte auskommt... :(

Sven
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Sandal man (2022-02-02 15:34:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998841433
Creo que olvidaste las etiquetas aquí.
sanchi (2022-02-02 20:59:18+00:00): Corregido. Gracias por avisar
gendy54 (2021-11-03 19:53:37+00:00): super!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Ygramul (2021-11-04 08:18:07+00:00): Gebäudefarben. JOSM macht manchmal irgendwie den Kommentar nicht richtig.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Xvtn (2022-04-12 15:30:47+00:00): Hyrum's 300 S seems to me like a residential or tertiary road like any other, is it OK if I change it to that? Unless there's something I'm not getting.
aweech (2022-04-12 23:33:16+00:00): Yeah, I picked minor/unclassified for that portion of 300 South because it looks like a low speed road but the only stop sign along that stretch is at Center. If you think that tertiary would work better, then go for it! It's definitely borderline between tertiary and unclassified.
Xvtn (2022-04-13 00:08:02+00:00): Gotcha. I guess I had assumed that unclassified was more of an "unknown/untagged" tag but I'm remembering now that there already is an actual unknown for roadways. So I'll leave it.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-04 06:43:55+00:00): Hi agraw, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
wkdgs (2021-11-05 12:48:38+00:00): Hi,

ich schreibe dir, weil du angegeben hast, dass nochmal jemand drüberschauen soll.

Ich kenne den note-Tag eher als Hinweis an andere Mapper. Dein Text hört sich eher so an, als wäre er für Benutzer der Karte gedacht.

Falls das so ist, würde ich den Text etwas kürzen und ihn in den description-Tag verschieben.

Hier gibt es noch weitere Infos zu den beiden Tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:note
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description

Gruß
winkeldings
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
adrianojbr (2021-11-03 22:57:43+00:00): Olá, Fossane. Por que você apagou as áreas criadas para, por exemplo, representar a pista do aeropoto?
Fossane (2021-11-04 01:28:04+00:00): Olá, Adriano. Apaguei principalmente porque a área não estava marcada como área, mas por uma combinação de linhas. Além disso, a documentação especifica (apesar da discussão) que as aeroways devem ser linhas com largura definida, e não áreas.
adrianojbr (2021-11-04 17:22:40+00:00): Áreas nada mais são que linhas fechadas, o que era o caso da pista do aeroporto e outras. O que exatamente você quer dizer com "a área não estava marcada como área"?

Quanto ao uso de aeroway somente em linhas, realmente está de acordo com a documentação.

Só ficou mesmo a duvida do que você entende por área.
Fossane (2021-11-05 00:27:53+00:00): Quero dizer que a região não estava com a etiqueta de área.

As linhas fechadas estavam etiquetadas como aeroway=runway, e não area:aeroway=runway ou area=yes.

Ou seja, é como se existissem 3 pistas paralelas (ao invés de 1 pista + a sua área).