piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Alecs01 (2018-05-12 08:03:10+00:00): Questa è una statua non un edificio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587568582 e perchè questa ostinazione a trasformare ogni strada in residential?
Gh0stz0x (2018-05-12 13:17:37+00:00): Pokemon GO? 🤔
Alecs01 (2018-05-12 14:05:41+00:00): Non credo, è sempre il solito "select" con un nuovo account
Gh0stz0x (2018-05-12 14:58:26+00:00): Ha... ma non ha nulla da fare?
Alecs01 (2018-05-12 08:02:16+00:00): La statua di Manzoni è un edificio?
Gh0stz0x (2018-05-12 13:16:11+00:00): Che domanda Alecs01, se uno è un clochard si, certo che si! 😂🤣
marc_marc_repair (2018-05-27 22:14:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59323231, 59322761 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
5m4u9 (2018-05-14 21:54:33+00:00): hola, gracias por editar en el mapa... pero no debemos inventarnos ciclovias que no existen!
//
por ciclovia entendemos a una via CONSTRUIDA exclusivamente para bicis o personas a pie... 
//
creo que lo que querías mapear es que es un lugar genial para maanejar bici, si lo es... para eso hay una etiqueta bicycle=yes que se añade a cada segmento de la calle ya dibujada... no volver a dibujar otra... iré a dar una vuelta por ahi para ponerlo asi o no...
tuxayo (2018-05-14 11:28:46+00:00): Pleins d'intersections entre bâtiments et landuses. Je corriges ça dans les jours à venir.

Et message de changeset par pratique. Notamment pour savoir si c'est celui-ci qui a créer les landuses
Marc_ch (2018-05-14 23:54:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Quel est la source de ce qui semble être un import non documenté non discuté et de qualité problématique ?
d'autant plus qu'en plus d'ajouter des données fantaisistes, il y a modifications de nombreuses données provenant de survey et qui sont modifiées de manières erronées par cet import
salutations,
Marc
marc_marc_repair (2018-05-27 21:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59320891, 59322524 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
marc_marc_repair (2018-05-26 22:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59302654 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
user_5359 (2018-05-12 06:13:12+00:00): Erneut bei OSM willkommen! Ich habe mir erlaubt den eingezeichnet Parkplatz nach den Standard zu beschreiben (gute Idee mit den Namen P ;) (aber leider falsch)).
user_5359 (2018-05-12 06:14:42+00:00): Kurze Nachfrage: Heißt die Praxis wirklich nach der Adresse oder doch mehr nach den Betreibern?
user_5359 (2018-05-12 06:20:28+00:00): Hallo, bitte trage Adressen nicht nicht mehrfach ein.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:41:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
Ossian Lore (2018-05-12 03:19:47+00:00): The name is properly Glasgow Gurdwara, subtitled Guru Granth Sahib Sikh Sabha. I contacted the Gurdwara to clarify this when I added it on Google Maps
GinaroZ (2018-05-12 21:38:46+00:00): The Gurdwara was already there but the geometry was all wrong, I copy/pasted to untangle it from connecting to other objects - that's why it's version 1.
Feel free to change the name :)
Ossian Lore (2018-05-13 17:07:29+00:00): I would... if I knew how to subtitle a name haha
eggie (2018-05-12 06:04:48+00:00): review... Moet het pad niet netjes aansluiten op het parallel-pad? Nu lopen ze aan de noordzijde samen op tot de highway=track.
Dit was je edit.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=58890795
keohr (2018-05-12 10:39:47+00:00): Dat klopt maar de parallel lopende pad had ik in een voorgaande changeset gedelete omdat het pad niet meer bestaat. Om een of andere reden is deze change niet door gevoerd.
Ik ga het pad nogmaals verwijderen.
eggie (2018-05-12 11:13:00+00:00): Oke.. nu is het wel weg zie ik. je kunt evt. de twee stukken bos netjes laten aansluiten en dan de source=3dshapes veranderen in local knowledge.
Marc_ch (2018-05-15 10:11:22+00:00): Bonjour,
quel est la source de cet import et où celui-ci a-t-il été discuté ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Import/Guidelines
carciofo (2018-05-15 20:41:47+00:00): Hi, could you please provide a verifiable source for the Logan Boulevard dual carriageway being completed and the name change to Bello Blvd?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58890871
marc_marc_repair (2018-05-26 22:47:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59302654 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
abrensch (2018-05-13 10:50:29+00:00): Ist das eine Baustelle (Würzbuger/Semmelstr.) ? Und wie lange etwa? Das sieht besser aus, wenn da dann auch highway=construction dran steht, statt einfach eine Lücke in der Strasse. Gruss, Arndt
tomgwue (2018-05-13 11:58:22+00:00): Ich bin den Feldweg, der als ersatz Weg dient gefahren und ich habe überall die Durchfahrt Verboten Schilder gesehen.
Bei der Baustelle selbst war ich noch nicht.
Ich weiß nur, das dort ein Kreisverkehr gebaut wird. Aber ich kann ihn nicht einzeichnen, da ich nicht weiß, wie er aussieht, wenn er fertig ist.
tomgwue (2018-05-13 12:00:19+00:00): Die Baustelle gibt es seit kurz nach Ostern. Wie lange es dauert weiß ich nicht.
tomgwue (2018-05-13 12:06:41+00:00): https://www.kuernach.de/media/www.kuernach.de/org/med_601/3165_umleitungsplan_semmelstrasse-kraeuterwiese_27.03.18.pdf

Nach den Baumaßnahmen muss bei dem Feldweg auch wieder das "oneway" weg und "access" auf Anlieger
abrensch (2019-06-02 14:39:00+00:00): ich habe den Feldweg wieder gesperrt, nachdem andere Benutzer den Kreisel eingezeichnet hatten
tomgwue (2019-06-02 15:28:44+00:00): Danke,
ist mir aus den Augen geraten.
Stereo_repair (2018-05-16 22:00:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59031643 where the changeset comment is: revert poor quality mapping
carciofo (2018-05-15 20:32:34+00:00): Hi, what's the source for this? Please enter meaningful changeset comments (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58891147
Константин Гам (2018-11-01 12:13:35+00:00): Убедительная просьба не создавать дубли, не писать в тег name всякую выдуманную несуразицу и не заливать обьекты газонами.

А также не стоит менять статус дворовых проездов, вне правил соглашения.
Гордеич (2018-11-01 12:42:05+00:00): "не писать в тег name всякую выдуманную несуразицу" - а именно, где "выдуманная несуразица"? 
"А также не стоит менять статус дворовых проездов, вне правил соглашения." - по какому именно проезду изменен статус?
Константин Гам (2018-11-01 13:30:54+00:00): Посмотрите содержимое пакета правок, в нем одна точка :) Точка еще и дублирует полигон.

Ошибка исправлена в карте уже
Гордеич (2018-11-01 14:02:55+00:00): Ок. Хорошо. 

А что значит "объекты газонами не заливать?" Разве политика или правила ОСМ это запрещают?
Гордеич (2018-11-01 14:03:14+00:00): )))
Константин Гам (2018-11-01 15:23:35+00:00): ОСМ это карты местности, по вашему на местнсоти трава прорастает сквозь детскую площадку, гравийную тропинку, стену дома?..
Такого нет в реальности, потому и не имеет место быть на карте.
Гордеич (2018-11-01 20:28:27+00:00): Спасибо, учту. Буду аккуратней наносить. )
marc_marc_repair (2018-05-26 22:47:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59302654 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
5m4u9 (2018-05-14 21:44:40+00:00): se necesita un consenso para saber dónde comienza y termina la cancha, este lugar tiene nombre que es mercado fidel aranibar...
gurglypipe (2018-05-13 23:28:49+00:00): Sorry, this is not correct. Those ways were already tagged with bicycle=yes or bicycle=designated, which shows that they are suitable for cycling on. The principle use of those roads is as service roads, and so they should be tagged as such. Were you having routing problems with a bike routing service, or something? I’ve reverted your changes in changeset 58936176.
Cycling_Monkey (2018-05-14 09:36:23+00:00): Im trying to plan routes on Lezynes site, but it does not recognise a cycle track from Morecambe to Lancaster to Caton/Brookhouse tho Google maps does, I got told they use this site for there maps and I got told Halton was the issue?
gurglypipe (2018-05-14 10:00:21+00:00): Thanks for your reply. Parts of the route were tagged as bicycle=yes when bicycle=designated would have been a bit more appropriate. I’ve fixed that in changeset #58891318. If the route planner is still not using the Luneside cycle path properly (and is using an up to date copy of the OSM database), you should get in touch with its authors, since the problem is then likely with the route planner.
Cycling_Monkey (2018-05-14 10:02:53+00:00): OK I will check it out tonight thanks
Cycling_Monkey (2018-05-15 09:03:00+00:00): Ive been looking at the cycle track/prom and from the Eric Morecambe statue to the venus and Cupid Statue there are access points from the road at most points where there is a road at 90' from Marine road east. plus from the  venus and Cupid Statue there isnt a sea wall so its just like a wide pavement, Are these easy changes?
gurglypipe (2018-05-15 11:45:50+00:00): I think those should be easy changes — please feel free to make them! I (or someone else) can double-check your edits afterwards and give feedback if it’s necessary.

Before editing, you might want to read up on the tagging scheme for cycleways (if you haven’t already), since it gives some good guidance about the ways of tagging different kinds of cycleway, cycle lane, footpath, etc.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway

Be bold, make some edits, and we can move forward from there. :-)
eggie (2018-05-12 06:01:17+00:00): De info heb ik naar de BAG adresnode verplaatst. Svp  niet zelf adressen aanmaken. Ze zijn al aanwezig.
user_3022894 (2018-05-18 20:19:13+00:00): Sorry, aber was soll "Diese Information ist nicht wichtig für Fahrradrouting" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8291821) genau heißen? Könntest du das vielleicht erklären? Wenn da ein "Radfahrer frei"-Zeichen steht, dann würde ich except=bicycle ergänzen..
RubenKelevra (2018-05-20 00:21:43+00:00): Da ist ein "nicht" zu viel in dem Satz.

Also dort ist ein Schild, das man nur gradeaus fahren darf, aber scharf rechts geht ein Fahrradweg, auf der Straße als Angebotsstreifen + der Erlaubnis, das Radfahrer die Einbahnstraße falsch herum befahren dürfen. Entsprechend muss da diese Abbiegeeinschränkung gemappt werden. Obwohl diese vermutlich nur den Autofahrern die Einbahnstraße anzeigen sollte, gilt sie auch für Radfahrern, was ihnen das direkte Abbiegen an der Stelle verbietet.
user_3022894 (2018-05-20 08:49:40+00:00): Ach so, okay jetzt verstehe ich. Das hast du auch schon korrigiert, wie ich sehe. Super, danke dann ist ja alles klar.
Beddhist (2018-05-11 22:38:20+00:00): There are several places where tracks follow stream beds and I want to be sure I have tagged these correctly. Thanks.
30303020 (2018-05-11 23:12:24+00:00): See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yJJ for possibly further spam.
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2018-05-28 10:06:17+00:00): Du bør ikke slette eksisterende data. Bruk "replace geometry" for å erstatte gamle data med nyere data sånn att ikke historikken blir borte.
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2018-05-28 10:07:32+00:00): Du bør også bruke "simplify way" for å redusere antallet noder i Elveg-data
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-05-14 10:55:34+00:00): Hey,

Je hebt dit stuk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160543033

aangeduid als zijnde één groot huis; maar dit lijkt mij eerder een woongebied. Verder gaf je een stuk woongebied ok de naam "dorpsstraat", wat mij ook niet correct lijkt...
James Derrick (2018-05-18 18:35:24+00:00): Hi Stephen,

Are you aware that this change set has altered ALL of Monkseaton, Whitley Bay, and a chunk of Tynemouth into one very large park?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33003544/history

Can I suggest you revert back from leisure=park to landuse=residential?

Best regards, 

James
James Derrick (2018-05-25 12:31:57+00:00): Hi Stephen,

As you have not responded and a large area is impacted by this changeset, I have reverted this change.
Keeping in contact with other mappers to collaboratively improve the map is a key part of OSM - please read the following guide:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
A WalkInThePark (2018-05-25 18:54:47+00:00): It is all one huge recreational park and is certainly not a common! It was a perfect edit!
James Derrick (2018-05-26 16:19:26+00:00): Who mentioned a common?

Unless you are using several 'sock puppet' accounts and are confused with:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59179560
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nixon22
viloan (2018-05-12 00:21:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
TheSwavu (2018-05-12 05:51:10+00:00): Why did you delete Mount Spaulding, Tasmania, Australia?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58892751
chachafish (2018-05-13 06:02:53+00:00): Hello, you have deleted the peak tag for Mount Evans. Was there a reason for this?
Justin TN (2018-05-13 06:03:37+00:00): Sorry this was a mistake
chachafish (2018-05-13 06:54:27+00:00): Okay, thanks. I'll fix Mount Evans.
Lokai (2018-05-12 05:34:59+00:00): Zahnarztpraxis <Ironie ein> die sich fast über ein ganzes Haus ersteckt, Wau! Telefon haben die noch nicht. Wiki gelesen auch nicht <Ironie aus>

Habe es geändert
viloan (2018-05-12 01:46:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2019-03-11 03:50:51+00:00): Adding a tag of name=Fork says nothing about what is there. Fairly useless information. 

Same with other name only tags.
jakecopp (2019-03-11 21:33:26+00:00): Hi Warin61,
Thanks for commenting.
What would be the best way to indicate to other mappers that I have only mapped one route from the fork, should I add a note instead?
Warin61 (2019-03-11 23:32:27+00:00): A  fixme, note, or a comment in descending order of 'importance'. Rather than just 'fork' .. for example, "another track takes off on the east" .. adds more information. I expect some of these will be dead ends.
Warin61 (2019-03-12 08:50:22+00:00): Having thought about 'forks' a little longer..best to map a way heading off in the direction of the divergent path .. and put a fixme/note or comment on the last node of the way saying 'continues' .. that will give an indication on the amp of what is there and tell other mappers that it does continue..
jakecopp (2019-03-12 21:52:34+00:00): Thanks very much for your help, see 68079332 for the changes I made. I added a short way heading off in the direction of the fork and added a note, and when I didn't know the direction added a note on a note along the path.
If there's anything else I can improve please let me know.
stromo (2018-05-15 13:06:38+00:00): What exactly have you changed? Should I do this for you with JOSM?

That would 100x faster ;)
badenk (2018-05-15 16:35:27+00:00): Hi Stromo:

   I have mainly been correcting the PDL:

    a) adding (copying) all the relevant railway tags
    b) correcting alignments
    c) adding points and splitting lines
    d) adding/changing tags for bridges/viaducts, tunnels, embankments, etc
    e) deleting erroneous tags such as 50 KV
    f) deleting redundant alignments and points

   Additionally, I have occasionally corrected nearby road and river alignments which were notably misaligned.

   I have been using "Go Map" on ios to copy tags over (a), which is manageable.  The primary activity which may be
easier accomplished in JSOM is deleting the incorrect tags such as (e) above, which were manually deleted on every way.

thanks,
Baden
CloCkWeRX (2018-05-14 09:00:30+00:00): Ah fantastic work! I'd been chipping away, as had @didz (grange). Hopefully I'll have the time to join up the mapping from Glenelg to Henley over the next few months, which will give us a pretty well mapped coastline!
jboltnz (2018-05-19 02:20:54+00:00): Cheers Clockwerx.
Glassman (2018-05-12 05:16:12+00:00): The service road at Valley Church is probably a service=park_aisle instead of a service=driveway. Driveways are typically for residential homes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58893562
jesterpm (2018-05-12 15:10:39+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I tagged it as service=driveway based on the description here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=parking_aisle#Disambiguation

Should the wiki be changed to read "residential only" or is this a local convention?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58893562
Glassman (2018-05-12 15:27:50+00:00): It's probably a matter of interpretation. If there was only a few parking spaces, then driveway is definitely appropriate, even for commercial areas. The church parking looked like there was a number of parking spaces. Again, its you interpretation which is fine.
user_5359 (2018-05-12 04:40:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
Supaplex (2019-02-07 18:20:58+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Viajero Perdido (2018-08-27 00:40:13+00:00): This is a "city" only in the minds of politicians.  OSM has its own criteria.
pitscheplatsch (2018-05-12 07:09:07+00:00): #vandalism
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=58894375
freebeer (2018-05-16 15:18:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59021413 where the changeset comment is: undo deletions of existing highways
pitscheplatsch (2018-05-16 18:13:35+00:00): @freebeer , thanks for reverting!
WalkerB (2018-05-18 19:20:21+00:00): Looks great!  Thank you!
Adamant1 (2018-05-12 11:56:50+00:00): Hi there. I know its a pain, but you should really add comments to your changes. Even if they are minimal. That way other editors know what your changing and where the source of the change was from.
mrlanduse (2018-05-14 08:11:30+00:00): +1
gscholz (2018-12-23 08:16:07+00:00): Hola,
your edits in tihs region have left over douzens of OSM errors regarding selfintersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-55.97203&lat=-13.22773&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can your please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
marc__marc (2020-04-04 11:48:42+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5613011674
what's the meaning of those tags ?
Regards,
Marc
abakus_uploader (2018-05-12 22:31:09+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
TheSwavu (2018-05-12 11:39:11+00:00): What's the point of putting in a fake address?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58894957
Bratananio (2018-05-12 06:02:02+00:00): Als "Park" habe ich es nur bezeichnet, weil es ein etwas größerer Bereich mit Bäumen ist. Ob dieser "Park" schön ist, ist eine andere Sache. Aber ich habe diesen Bereich abgeändert und hoffe, dass es so jetzt gefällt.
Eric S (2018-07-12 07:25:53+00:00): Sur le bâtiment, il y a marqué en gros PHELMA et en plus petit sur la porte côté accueil "Bâtiment Recherche". C'est ce qui doit être mis dans le nom du bâtiment. Si vous voulez indiquer où se trouvent les laboratoires LEPMI et SIMAP (qui sont répartis sur plusieurs bâtiments), il faut trouver autre chose, par exemple une relation incluant tous les bâtiments avec office=research.