piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
muralito (2019-05-08 15:17:51+00:00): Hi Plutocrats.

When adding roads, please also consider tagging access restrictions. For example, those roads seems to be access=private, so it can't be used for routing.
Plutocrats (2019-05-08 23:39:49+00:00): Thanks very much; since I could not verify road access status from aerial photography, I will delete the ways.  I will keep access status in mind for the future.  Thanks for the advice; best wishes.
muralito (2019-05-09 22:21:55+00:00): Yes, you can't verify the fact, but an educated guess when would be that roads in private properties like this farms,  almost always are private, even if they didn't have a gate.
Irfandi IRM-ED (2022-12-01 03:36:20+00:00): Hi matteo huish.
You did a great job. Due to the problem of spiky buildings at https://maproulette.org/challenge/30235/task/142648974 also based on Maxar and Bing Aerial Imagery, I found that this object does not match satellite imagery. So I have to fix it.
Thank you for your understanding.
Happy mapping!
catdreamer (2019-05-14 07:43:01+00:00): 請勿在里程碑與通訊點上增加不相關的tag
Supaplex (2019-08-09 16:18:01+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
acet2ngaia (2019-05-17 10:39:09+00:00): Hello! Your changeset comment says you added a missing park, but it appears you actually deleted the designation for a military area. As far as I'm aware, it's still a military area. Please share if you know of any information regarding changes to its military status; otherwise, I'll assume it was a mistake and restore the missing tags. Cheers.
freebeer (2019-05-22 15:29:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70519684 where the changeset comment is: restore deleted military tagging
acet2ngaia (2019-05-23 15:56:39+00:00): Thanks, freebeer
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-05-08 22:35:13+00:00): Unfortunately, this edit has tagged a section of Urdaneta-Calasiao Road, a national road, into a residential road, which may cause routing issues. I'll fix that.
mavl (2019-05-08 16:35:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Какая связь между "ограждением" и остановкой?  
Что значит "А.остановка"?  
  
Прочитайте, пожалуйста, статьи документации OpenStreetMap:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D1%8B
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:31:24+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-08 19:48:50+00:00): Hi Yevgeny Gromov.

Starting with this changeset you created almost  2,000 (!) changesets with zero map edits within 1.5 hour. I guess something went wrong, correct? Thanks.
Yevgeny Gromov (2019-05-10 05:21:40+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch!

Every railway station and halt on 1520mm area (railways with gauge 1520 mm) has Unified Markup Code (ESR code from Russian) that is being tagged as esr:user. I'm running Photolines project where railway lines and stations information is collected. I found that data in OSM is complete and decided to share info I already have.
Every ESR code contains 6 digits, but I've made a bug, so codes starting with 0 where put to OSM without it. I noticed it and fixed my errors. I was fixing line-by-line, so the number of changesets is high. Please contact me if there're any problem with it. For me looks everthing is fixed.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-10 05:51:18+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

Again, your created changesets did not contain *ANY* map edit. So you made 2,000 changesets with zero element changes. For me, this looks like a bug in your script, programm or whatever you used.
Yevgeny Gromov (2019-05-10 05:53:47+00:00): Yes. This won't be used anymore as it was needed just once. Not all stattions needed a fix while changeset were open.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:31:21+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mavl (2019-05-08 16:27:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы уверены, что эта дорога длиной 8,6 км вне населённых пунктов имеет название "улица Севастьяновых"?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45768862
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:31:17+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:31:11+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Polarbear (2019-07-15 22:16:24+00:00): Schau bitte mal auf die Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845596 wg Sperrungszustand Gleimtunnel
kartonage (2019-07-16 02:25:04+00:00): Danke für die Info, hab dort geantwortet.
abakus_uploader (2019-05-08 22:30:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2019-05-09 17:16:37+00:00): Hallo, könntest Du mal den Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261212343 prüfen? Welche Bedeutung hat das Tag "20"="transformer"?
98Ujm (2019-05-09 18:19:49+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, das war ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler!
osmviborg (2019-05-08 08:27:03+00:00): Der er livlig trafik med biler på din "sti": https://skraafoto.kortforsyningen.dk/oblivisionjsoff/index.aspx?project=denmark&id=QNGZDQ
Hjart (2019-05-08 08:42:58+00:00): Staldgaarden er skiltet som blind vej ud mod Rosenvænget (se https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1769588) og derfor må der være en eller anden art spærring ud mod Engvej. Måske er der bare tale om skilte, men det kan vi heller ikke se på skråfotos.
osmviborg (2019-05-08 10:45:37+00:00): Hvad der er tydeligt er at det stykke vej du har lavet til sti, ikke er en sti.
Hjart (2019-05-08 11:43:27+00:00): Ok, men det er også tydeligt at der må være en form for spærring på stykket, så indtil vi har vi bedre styr på forholdene synes jeg det er rimeligt at tagge den som sti (med en fixme på naturligvis)
osmviborg (2019-05-08 12:03:03+00:00): Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups
Hjart (2019-05-08 12:10:30+00:00): Hvis du har et bedre forslag er du naturligvis velkommen til at byde ind
tux67 (2019-05-08 11:10:53+00:00): Hallo Pharmy,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Bei dem Change hast du den Punkt eines Weges ein paar 100m verschleppt. Siehe:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70010984
Das ist jetzt korregiert mit der Bitte um Vorsicht.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Was soll das "Gebiet inzwischen bebaut!" (und insb. das "!") bedeuten?
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70010984
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:31:07+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
czubi (2019-05-08 09:47:54+00:00): Mache dich bitte mit OSM vertraut und trage ich irgendwas an irgendeinen node dazu. in diesem FAll einen eigenen node setzen und office=company dran, dazu den namen und die weiteren Attribute. name=* ist nur für Eigennamen gedacht. Ein Privatweg wird mit access=privat gekennzeichnet. Bitte informiere dich vorher ehe du weitere Sachen änderst/einträgst. oder mach einfach eine Fehlermeldung hin dann machen das andere für dich danke.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:31:03+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:55:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
czubi (2019-05-08 09:36:30+00:00): Jeden Tag offen? auch Sonntag:
czubi (2019-05-08 09:39:47+00:00): Wenn nein bitte noch die Wochentage vor opening_hours ergänzen (englische Schreibweise)
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:31:01+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
frosm (2019-05-09 08:54:46+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
Hello and welcome.
osm fonctionne avec des tags, ajouter un faux nom pour décrire un objet est une erreur.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-13 16:10:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136059221 where the changeset comment is: Reverting MAPS.ME garbage such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10893535607 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7125
szydzio (2020-11-09 18:54:29+00:00): Czy ten budynek naprawdę nazywa się Jonek a wcześniej nazywał się Kondziu?
frosm (2019-05-09 07:48:07+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
l'url que vous avez ajouté ne fonctionne pas
bonne continuation
frosm (2019-05-09 18:25:59+00:00): la cause était un T devenu R dans la touR.
par ailleurs, je m'étonne de l'adresse.
votre site renseigne 1 La Tour Figeac mais vous avez encodé 1 Chemin de la Lamberte.
laquelle des 2 infos est correcte ?
user_5359 (2019-05-08 17:24:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
Kovoschiz (2019-05-08 11:59:00+00:00): 1. That's not the common name, only sometimes used officially. 
2. There's a confusion between the roundabout and the roundabout interchange. 
3. There's the difference of naming the junction, and the junction's roadways. For roundabout interchange, without gazetted name I would put the "Interchange" in junction name and "Roundabout" in the roundabout.
Kovoschiz (2019-05-08 12:34:40+00:00): 4. There are inconsistency in whether the road suffix is included in the interchange name, suggesting it's not a proper name.
Kovoschiz (2019-05-08 12:40:07+00:00): 5. Additionally, "Po Shek Wu" is only a ported road name, not a toponym. It does not follow he future Po Shek Wu Estate.
Kovoschiz (2019-05-08 12:54:01+00:00): 6. `motorway_junction` are put on the major road (ie `motorway`, `trunk` main line, as with exits.
Kovoschiz (2019-05-08 13:25:25+00:00): 7. Please don't mix up `ref` and `name` either.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:30:58+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Nakaner (2019-05-09 08:48:17+00:00): Hallo Tobias,

bitte beachte beim Ergänzen von Namen, dass wir als Namen nur Eigennamen erfassen, keine Beschreibungen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Ich bezweifle, dass "Berliner Toilette" ein Eigenname ist, der es verdient, bei jeder Toilette erfasst zu werden.

Viele Grüße

Michael
frosm (2019-05-11 00:25:40+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
ce petit mot pour vous dire que lorsque quelque chose n'a pas d'adresse postale (par ex un parc), il suffit de ne pas mettre d'adresse postale :)
bonne continuation
archie (2019-06-07 20:38:11+00:00): Du har lagt stier på broerne. Name-taggen verkar överföras både till bron och till stien. Det hele ser lite märkligt ut. Är det inte lite överambitiöst med att lägga highway=footway på broen? Det ligger väl i sakens natur att man_made=pier även kan användas för gångtafik. Eller är det analogien till bridge=yes +  highway=footway som är så förlockande?
luiswoo (2019-05-08 12:50:36+00:00): Должно быть «Спокойный переулок» https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:30:55+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
frosm (2019-05-11 00:28:53+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
ce petit mot pour vous dire que lorsque quelque chose n'a pas d'adresse postale (par ex un lieu dit), il suffit de ne pas mettre d'adresse postale :)
par contre ce serrait utile d'ajouter l'information que c'est un lieu dit :)
si c'est une ferme habitée, techniquement ce n'est plus un lieu dit mais le nom d'un batiment habité isolé
bonne continuation
Andinet (2019-05-11 00:45:57+00:00): Bonjour, le lieu dit Lasplaces s’applique à l’ensemble des bâtiments.
Cordialement
frosm (2019-05-11 01:21:42+00:00): oui comme souvent, si vous le souhaitez vous pouvez faire un polygone qui définit l'étendue du lieu
et c'est une ferme ? avec un quelqu'un qui habite sur place ?
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:30:52+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Ninjoh (2020-01-05 15:07:28+00:00): You changed the geometry of "Landgoed Deelerwoud", which you should never have done. This is a boundary which you can not just move because that way it looks less cluttered on the map. When I created this boundary I even added a note tag to prevent this very thing from happening!
I'm gonna need to revert that now.

Secondly, you merged forest areas which had lanes of no data between them, which is *highly* controversial in the Dutch OSM community, and best not to burn your fingers on that either.

Please be more careful and educated about the place where you're mapping next time.
whb (2019-05-08 22:15:20+00:00): Ist die Komplettsperrung des Waldweges bei OSM so beabsichtigt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29248010
Denn im Änderungssatzkommentar steht nur, dass der "tracktype" angepasst worden sei, was aber nicht geschehen ist.
4alec (2019-05-09 05:39:05+00:00): Ja.  Ist ein hoher nicht umgeh- bzw. umfahrbarer Zaun. Dahinter wahrscheinlich Privatgelände.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:30:50+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
user_5359 (2019-05-08 17:21:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your change set because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
luiswoo (2019-05-08 15:25:54+00:00): sp!rt, нп указываться точкой И полигоном!
Не нужно заниматься вандализмом.
sp!rt (2019-05-08 15:46:38+00:00): А смысл?
luiswoo (2019-05-08 15:59:51+00:00): Для совместимости. Если есть желание сие пообсуждать — то это делается на форуме.
luiswoo (2019-05-08 16:07:37+00:00): Кроме того, что это указание центра нп для рендера, в отношениях границ именно точку указывают, как административный центр. Я хз зачем она нужна.
mapman44 (2019-05-24 16:12:05+00:00): Hi, Constable, thanks for your edit. There were three other segments of Glacier Drive that were incorrect so I fixed those.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70016498
Constable (2019-05-24 17:16:09+00:00): no probs, you're welcome!
abakus_uploader (2019-05-08 22:30:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 09:44:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 70000761, 70000891, 70000906, 70000944, 70000986, 70001001, 70001080, 70001124, 70001136, 70001141, 70001151, 70001163, 70001170, 70001175, 70001186, 70001204, 70001221, 70001244, 70001260, 70001265, 70001275, 70001281, 70001288, 70001295, 70001306, 70001317, 70001329, 70001343, 70001354, 70001362, 70001371, 70001381, 70001395, 70001401, 70001407, 70001416, 70001425, 70001433, 70001440, 70001449, 70001456, 70001468, 70001485, 70001493, 70001502, 70001509, 70001523, 70001538, 70001552, 70001570, 70001573, 70001592, 70001609, 70001623, 70001636, 70001649, 70001656, 70001663, 70001674, 70001682, 70001688, 70001698, 70001709, 70001720, 70001731, 70001737, 70001746, 70001761, 70001770, 70001778, 70001782, 70001790, 70001795, 70001816, 70001824, 70001845, 70001862, 70001897, 70001907, 70001917, 70001922, 70001937, 70001967, 70001978.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-08 09:46:26+00:00): Comment should have been:
Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6456688895.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2745 for more details.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-08 15:30:46+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Palolo (2019-05-09 20:05:56+00:00): Please do not trace roads in these HOT tasks. The tagging is not correct. The instructions call for mapping buildings only.
user_5359 (2019-05-09 17:27:42+00:00): Hello! Please explain the both unusually keys on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6457566485.
okwak (2019-05-10 07:42:36+00:00): Sorry, it is a mistake. These nodes have been created for a private map with Mapcontrib and I did not know that they have been sent to OSM : they have to be suppressed.
okwak (2019-05-10 08:39:13+00:00): The nodes have been supressed
trigpoint (2019-05-08 10:21:18+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone a bit wrong.

You seem to have created a duplication of existing ways. Please do not do this. There are route planning apps available in OSM and that use is, for example grapphopper.com.
Cheers Phil
Jon_Collins (2019-05-08 11:02:47+00:00): Hi, I have since deleted. New to the system. Thought I'd see how I can create a new route. Doesn't seem like I can without getting a telling off. However, now I have your attention. This morning I tried to ask a question on the forum but it failed to process. Essentially, I am wondering what the source of your Cycling layer is. Is it completely created by the public? Or have you pulled it from somewhere else?
Jon_Collins (2019-05-08 11:05:01+00:00): Also, your GPS traces. Are these walks, runs, rides? What apps are they taken from? And can they be clustered in a similar way to Strava's Heatmaps?
trigpoint (2019-05-08 14:00:09+00:00): Hi Jon, thank you for removing that. 
To answer your questions firstly the forum gets very little attention in the UK, we are far more active on the talk-gb mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb.
OSM is a geographical database that can be rendered in many ways. The cycling layer is just a specialized render of OSM data, emphasising those features of interest to cyclists.
OSM data is mostly created by the public, we import very little in the UK and that is mostly boundaries.
The GPS tracks may have comments stating what they are, we essentially upload gpx files. Most of mine are from my gps, occasionally they maybe from OSMand, but that will be car and road stuff.
Routes in OSM are done as relations, a collection of ways, but these should be verifiable i.e. signed on the ground.
For creating my own routes I use graphhopper.com, which allows via points and different modes.
HTH Phil
Jon_Collins (2019-05-08 14:42:25+00:00): Thanks Phil. I guess it's that bit about the Cycling layer being created by the public. I could do with finding out who has added what and when. Also what their reasons were. There are some routes I have questions mark over. Whether they are actual recognised cycle routes in any way, shape or form. Or whether they are just possible routes that connect to an actual one, if that makes sense? In other words, I have one or two concerns over the legitimacy of some of the routes. If this is the case, surely anyone can draw anything on there and call it a route? Which, from what I can gather, goes against the purpose of the layer, and indeed the website?
I've looked at Graphhopper today but didn't find it particularly useful for what I need to do, i.e. to create new official cycling routes for my local Council. Some of which will be on land that is neither a road or a track. Maybe it is best for delivery drivers etc, which it seems fairly keen to promote.
Anyway, thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Jon