piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pio2_122 (2022-02-14 19:31:08+00:00): Zrobione.
Dodałem jeszcze inne wyjątki wynikające z regulaminów. W SPP opłata nie jest pobierana 2 maja, 24 i 31 grudnia. A we wszystkich wcześniej wspomnianych płatnych strefach/parkingach opłaty nie są pobierane również w święta (jako że nie są to "dni robocze").

Gdy miałem już wysyłać zmiany, JOSM wyświetlił mi ostrzeżenie odnośnie błędu składni dla "Mo-Fr 00:00-08:00,17:00-00:00", po zerknięciu na przykład z OSM-wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Closing_after_midnight) poprawiłem ten fragment na Mo-Fr 00:00-08:00,17:00-24:00 i ostrzeżenie zniknęło.

Finalne tagowanie wygląda następująco:
1) dla SPP: fee:conditional=no @ (Mo-Fr 00:00-08:00,17:00-24:00; Sa; Su; May 2; Dec 24; Dec 31; PH)

2) dla PPN i SZSM: fee:conditional=no @ (Mo-Fr 00:00-08:00,17:00-24:00; Sa; Su; PH)

Na koniec, wielkie dzięki za bardzo dobrą współpracę :)
kubahahaha (2022-02-14 19:41:44+00:00): Dzięki, fajnie że udało się rozwiązać wszystkie uwagi , też dziękuję za dobrą współpracę :D
Warin61 (2022-09-20 01:55:28+00:00): Err ... 'australian_football' ... looks like rugby to me. Altered.
Pete Owens (2022-02-14 21:48:14+00:00): The ONLY section of shared pavement is to enable cyclists heading N-S on the Sankey Valley Trail to make a short diversion to the east to cross at the island. (Though neither the pavement or island is is actually suitable).

You can't put the sign in the middle of the road - it has to be one side or the other.  It is utterly ridiculous to put a short stub to the west just because the sign is on the west - just as it would be absurd to create a break in the route if the sign happened to be on the other side.

Exactly the same is true for restrictions such as speed limits and no entry signs on side roads. Again the signs of necessity will be offset from the centre line of the main road - but you don't include a short stub of two way road on the grounds that it would be perfectly legal to drive the wrong way up the street just as far as the sign.
Falsernet (2022-02-14 21:55:34+00:00): Legally you can cycle as far as the signs and that's all that matters. It doesn't matter what you would, should or are meant to do. Bicycle=no means it's illegal to cycle there which is incorrect. It's arguably not irrelevant information where the boundary is, as it's not alien to ride up to the limit, get off and walk the extra to the chippy.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-15 02:07:04+00:00): Being discussed on talk-gb at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2022-February/028659.html .
tastrax (2022-02-21 02:41:21+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-14 11:07:09+00:00): test可还行……

虽然这个changeset的内容看起来没什么问题……但是这个名字……一定会引来纠察的啊……以后请不要这样做了的说
冰觞沐雨 (2022-02-16 21:09:57+00:00): 呜呜呜.....知道错了的说.....以及为什么喵喵说话越来越像我了喵......?
Tantri IRM-ED (2023-03-21 04:00:46+00:00): Hi Angys, your editing looks awesome
I want to ask some questions whether the building is in relation with ID 13801159
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/13801159). is that building college actually one building? 

What are your considerations for making buildings with IDs 1031066543, 1031066541 and 1031066542 into one relation?
The relation that you made caused the error "multipolygon outer way shares segment with other ring" that the outer of relation should not be share nodes with each other.

May I delete the relation 13801159 and merge the area to one area college? or have you any other suggestions
Dimacn (2022-02-14 09:54:36+00:00): В названии улицы должно быть только: Нижняя улица. Пожалуйста придерживайтесь соглашения о наименовании улиц в OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Dimacn (2022-02-14 09:59:35+00:00): Озеро не может иметь название Озеро. Пожалуйста удалите название.
user_5359 (2022-02-14 06:21:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is your interpretation of payment:espèce (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment)

Bienvenue à l'OSM ! Quelle est votre interprétation du paiement:espèce (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:payment)
codolini (2022-02-14 06:35:46+00:00): Hello ! In French, "espèce" is cash. Don’t worry, I mentioned it for French users.
user_5359 (2022-02-14 06:43:22+00:00): OSM is a database for all people and not only for French speakers. Please use the defined keys so that everyone can benefit from the data.
tastrax (2022-02-21 02:35:34+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-07 10:28:07+00:00): Hello, and thanks for mapping!

Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3875522 ?
85Bas (2022-02-14 06:35:29+00:00): Beste Jos,
Dergelijke tijdelijke maatregelen horen niet op deze manier (verwijderen van wegen) te worden verwerkt in OSM; op deze manier routeert het Julianaplein namelijk niet meer. De manier om dit wel correct aan te geven is met conditional restrictions. Dit had ik zaterdag (met veel tijd en moeite) al gedaan. Ik zou je daarom willen vragen je wijzigingen ongedaan te maken. Ik wil dit ook wel voor je doen als je geen beschikking hebt over de reverter-plugin.
Groet, 85Bas
Jos Veneberg (2022-02-14 06:39:51+00:00): In dat geval, graag. 

Excuus.
eggie (2022-02-14 07:04:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback 85Bas..
Kun jij even 'reverten'? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
85Bas (2022-02-14 08:01:31+00:00): Revert gedaan.

Welkom Jos en veel plezier gewenst op OSM.
Supaplex (2022-02-15 10:59:21+00:00): Could you use the lifecycle tagging, add prefix disused for its previous usage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117377824
Supaplex (2022-02-14 10:12:21+00:00): 應該要保留你原先加的，因為比較早，把後來的那個標籤複製到舊的
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117377885
Vintagejhan (2022-02-15 07:38:08+00:00): 感謝~~沒注意到時間編輯的差異
Warin61 (2022-02-14 21:22:57+00:00): Hi,

When a footway crosses a building .. there is either an entrance - should be mapped as a node on both the footway and building, or the building is a roof and should be tagged layer=1 (or 1 higher than the footway layer).
Footway Way: 1031077605 crosses several buildings..
Sam Wilson (2022-02-16 03:24:02+00:00): Good point, I think I knew that! Sorry, I was being hurried the other day when I added that path. I've fixed it up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117457928
Glassman (2022-02-16 18:49:20+00:00): #TIP: When creating an object  inside of another - the grass area inside of the parking lot, it needs to be part of a multipolygon. Not a bit intuitive to create. I went ahead and made the change.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117378312
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-20 21:10:41+00:00): A park should not exclude the trees
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117378541
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-20 22:07:04+00:00): Parking lots should generally cover the whole area including the parking aisles.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117378541
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-20 22:10:22+00:00): Buildings should reflect reality. Not just what is visible from an aerial image
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117378541
CarniLvr79 (2022-02-21 07:09:23+00:00): Buildings reflecting reality not what the aerial image is? That is not reality because the trees cover the building and you therefore cannot know what reality is. It does not matter what you are demanding. It is personal preference. GPS is point A to point B. If you get the corner of the building right or wrong does not matter.

As for parking lots. Again, it does not matter. You are nit picking to precision about something that does not matter. And I do not agree with you. I prefer the way I have been doing it. Either method works fine. 

As for excluding trees? Not even sure what you are talking about. I include as much as I can to make a good quality map.
ElliottPlack (2022-02-22 19:51:54+00:00): Fixed the park, trees in the park, and the parking lot to the standard of how these sorts of things should be mapped. Please review. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117742217
Tiliae (2022-07-17 13:49:18+00:00): Moin!

Du hast hier nach Orthophoto grade1 gesetzt. Das deckt sich leider nicht mit der Realität auf dem Boden:

https://i.imgur.com/ohU8dgl.jpg

Der Fehler ist mir auch schon ein paar Mal passiert, mittlerweile bin ich das deutlich vorsichtiger. Ich änder das mal.

Gruß

Tiliae
RicoElectrico (2022-02-14 13:48:00+00:00): Cześć, zgodnie z komentarzem bota pod poprzednim zestawem zmian, tu powinno być addr:place, a nie addr:city - bo to wieś bez nazwanych ulic. Zmienisz to zaznaczając budynek, rozwijając "wszystkie znaczniki" i zmieniając addr:city na addr:place. Popatrz na inne budynki z adresami w okolicy.

PS: Widzę na zdjęciach lotniczych, że obok są też inne budynki niedodane jeszcze do mapy, możesz je również narysować :)
letihu (2022-02-22 10:13:22+00:00): Hallo,
diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031080501/history
habe ich wieder entfernt. Eine Straße existierte schon an dieser Stelle und diese wurde von dir zusätzlich eingetragen.
Tempo 30 habe ich auf die alte Straße übertragen.
RicoElectrico (2022-02-16 14:03:54+00:00): Cześć. Nie musisz wysyłać każdego budynku osobno :) Jeśli poprawiasz kilka budynków w okolicy, to wyślij je razem. Najlepiej, żeby w jednej edycji były powiązane obiekty, jeśli robisz kilka podobnych edycji.
Super-Map (2022-02-14 16:17:30+00:00): Hi Eric Bie, in your changeset for the node: "8704360814" I thing it's "unisex", not only for "male"... Have a nice day and "fun".
Super-Map (2022-02-14 16:25:42+00:00): Hi again, concerning this way: "2167563487", if you "take an eye" you will see your name is "incorrect"! Moreover, this pharmacy have been moved few buildings further than this point. An update is coming, but if you can...
Denis_Helfer (2022-02-15 07:02:42+00:00): Bonjour Eric,
Merci de cesser de remplacer railway:track_ref par le contenu de ref.
railway:track_ref indique l'identifiant de la voie. Ref indique l'indentifiant de la ligne.
george1201 (2022-03-25 22:45:17+00:00): Woran kann man erkennen, dass dies ein privater Parkplatz ist? Ich konnte kein entsprechendes Hinweisschild finden. Ist es versteckt? Ein P-Schild DE:314 fehlt. Ich habe dort nur das Haltverbot-Schild DE:283 gesehen.
aceman444 (2022-02-15 23:29:25+00:00): Thanks for the changes here. The building still isn't placed correctly (I don't know why as you claim to use Ortofotomozaika SR, which is a good imagery), but better than it was.
Dimacn (2022-02-14 09:57:11+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляете дороги поверх уже существующих, вы тем самым дублируете задваиваете дороги. Нужно просто редактировать и изменять существующие дороги.
user_3022894 (2022-02-16 21:14:44+00:00): Perfekt, super, vielen Dank :-)

Nur die Werte von "website" und "phone" sind glaube ich vertauscht...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Dinamik (2022-04-02 22:33:22+00:00): Здравствуйте! Поясните, пожалуйста, на примере точки https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9504216124 по какому принципу Вы определяете места для размещения POI аптеки?
aceman444 (2022-02-15 23:40:13+00:00): Hi, why have you misplaced the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67842825 ? A building needs to be mapped where its base is on the aerial imagery, not where the roof is. The roof is at wrong position due to taking photos from the side.

And why are you splitting the buildings into parts, when it is a a single building? Why using a multipolygon for connected buildings? At https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031095212 why did you add amenity=library when there already is the library mapped as a node inside the building?

Please less of the mass changes and  be more careful.
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-14 19:54:25+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Great, your first test.
Should be reverted? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
skyper (2022-02-15 16:45:38+00:00): Hallo Maximilian
Das war doch alles so in Ordnung!
Bitte lese im Wiki noch mal nach, was `public_transport=platform` an einem Knoten bedeutet.

Habe es zurückgesetzt,
Grüße skyper
basilisk (2023-05-19 23:17:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61720490/history

После этого импорта со здания пропал тег building=yes и оно перестало быть зданием. 

Да, это старое изменение, надеюсь уже импорт у вас исправлен.
kate_rocketdata (2023-06-05 10:02:42+00:00): Спасибо, что внесли изменения. Импорт уже исправлен.
eggie (2022-02-14 11:02:22+00:00): Info samengevoegd.. 
Je zou met een reguliere editor als josm of  iD kunnen samenvoegen. 
Al die dubbele adressen geeft anders vcervuiling. Denk dat OsmAnd meer iets is voor snel onderweg iets aan te passen.
Thuis kun je het dan aanpassen.
MVG en mapse,
eggie
user_5359 (2022-02-15 11:38:57+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Statt name:<lang-code> schreiben wir die tatsächlich verwendete Sprache als zweibuchstabiges Kürzel der Sprache in kleinbuchstaben: Also hier name:en. Beide entdeckte Vorkommen sind bereits korrigiert
Diacritic (2022-02-16 06:43:07+00:00): Hi HighRouleur.

I'm going to undo the chang you made here.

Kingston Central Boulevard has been extended across where this taxiway once was. I only very recently updated this road to match its new geometry.

I would strongly suggest that when a road looks glaringly out of sync with the aerial imagery that you check a few different sources. In this case, I have uploaded numerous Mapillary images driving down that road.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117383192
HighRouleur (2022-02-16 08:42:09+00:00): Thanks Diacritic. 
It looked to me like someone had accidentally dragged a node and joined it to  another way. 
I rode all the roads in Moorabbin during the last lockdown and the roads appeared to match the aerial geometry.
user_5359 (2022-02-16 17:12:56+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Statt name:<lang-code> schreiben wir die tatsächlich verwendete Sprache als zweibuchstabiges Kürzel der Sprache in kleinbuchstaben: Also hier name:en. Die weiteren drei entdeckten Vorkommen sind bereits korrigiert
user_5359 (2022-02-14 11:06:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9504308109 (for example) What is your interpretation of opening_hours="Mo-Su 00:00-00:00". Is the buisness closed or alwaysopen (please use 24/7)
kate_rocketdata (2022-02-14 11:45:58+00:00): Thank you very much! Corrected.
user_5359 (2022-02-14 19:30:51+00:00): You forgot https://www.osm.org/node/9504308105, 
https://www.osm.org/node/9504308106, https://www.osm.org/node/9504308108, https://www.osm.org/node/9504308110,
kate_rocketdata (2022-02-23 06:44:53+00:00): Corrected!
eggie (2022-02-14 10:54:57+00:00): Dag Swin.. Je vraagt feedback Zo te zien klopt het nu.
Gr eggie
Sanniu (2022-02-15 08:02:32+00:00): Hi
addr:street is not a street tag, It is only applicable to addresses and should not be set on highway=* objects.
topius (2022-02-15 08:47:18+00:00): Hi JoeG, 

Thank you for your detailed additions of farmland and waterways. Please be aware that coffee and tea plantations should be tagged as orchards, though, according to the OSM wiki. I have made the corresponding changes.
JoeG (2022-02-15 10:38:52+00:00): Thanks! I had no ground truth that they were coffee and tea, so very happy that you've confirmed that.
eggie (2022-02-14 10:57:57+00:00): Op aansluitende  route 74 - 88 staat: 

Ruiterverbod ingevoerd bij Landgoed Den Berg, route lijkt verplaatst naar het oosten, verdere survey nodig. Wellicht een aanwijzing.

MVG
eggie
Careless2000 (2022-02-14 11:07:37+00:00): Dat zal kloppen. rhn 84-89 ten noorden is confirmed nog wel ruiterroute.
Zal verder onderzoek doen naar rhn 74-88. Maar die zal dus ook naar No gezet moeten worden voor Horse.
user_11609320 (2022-02-14 09:20:14+00:00): my understanding is that if the cycle path is separated from the road, then it should be marked as a cycleway. this bike path is a class 2 bike path. class 2 are part of the road.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 16:29:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867973718/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit
Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value
Jorisbo (2025-12-11 16:37:02+00:00): Hi, Mateusz, no problem, regards, Joris
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Nakaner-repair (2022-03-04 15:24:10+00:00): reverted by changesets 118097098, 118097028, 118097009, 118096988, 118096693 due to violation of the Automated Edits Code of Conduct and introducing wrong information into the database
MrX_ua (2022-02-18 00:41:03+00:00): Що за банкомати на місцях де їх ніколи не було??
Tesla (2022-02-18 12:24:18+00:00): С этого аккаунта систематически делают массовые импорты не проверяя данные полученные от коммерческих организаций. Вред проекту OSM должен прекратиться, пора писать очередную жалобу в комитет.
kate_rocketdata (2022-02-18 12:47:22+00:00): Добрый день! Во-первых, как вы уже заметили, мы систематически совершаем выгрузку по координатам, которые предоставляют нам клиенты и ориентируемся только на них. Если есть какие-то недочеты, то мы их берем в работу и исправляем. Во-вторых, прежде, чем писать жалобы, вы, по возможности, можете принимать участие в корректировке данных, которые мы выгружаем на форум https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ и ждем 1 неделю для проверки данных, только потом они попадают на OSM. 
Таким образом, мы открыты к диалогу, сотрудничаем со всеми странами и никакого вреда проекту OSM не наносим)
MrX_ua (2022-02-18 15:06:03+00:00): Чого я за вас маю перевіряти дані? Ви мені платите? Самі маєте перевіряти. І як це не шкодите проекту?? Ви заливаєте неперевіренні дані. Відкатуйте чейнжсет від 14 лютого чи перевіряйте все
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 23:29:14+00:00): What exactly was this customer feedback? Was streetside imagery used? Has someone confirmed this on the ground?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117384951
shamraevahelen (2022-04-29 13:11:41+00:00): Good afternoon, North American Roads were used.
Frans S (2022-02-14 14:02:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here as well.
Your mappings are quite good and accurate.
You map just these few buildings , however many more round buildings needed to be mapped as well.
Best regards
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Allison P (2022-07-20 21:16:32+00:00): Permit for Jacksons (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8331494057) issued July 8. I jumped the gun here.
nevw (2022-02-14 10:58:47+00:00): Hi
You have changed most of Woodcock Road in to a bridge. I expect you need to split the road each side of the river and just add the bridge tag to that small section of the road which passes over river (where the bridge is built)
nevw (2022-02-15 08:15:00+00:00): I removed the bridge tag from 1km stretch of road and leave to you to place where needed.
aharvey (2022-02-24 10:55:33+00:00): Thanks for this improvement!
MFlamm (2022-02-14 10:18:57+00:00): Attention: la valeur "designated" signifie "Cette voie est conçue pour" et non pas "Certains véhicules ont droit d'utiliser cette voie" ;-) Donc, sur ces voies, il me semble préférable de mettre "motor_vehicle=private" ou évrtl. "motor_vehicle=permit" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:access%3Dpermit)
Vickoh51 (2022-02-14 10:59:39+00:00): D'accord, en passant la souris sur "Designated" il est affiché "Accès autorisé selon la signalisation ou la règlementation locale". En l'occurrence il y a un panneau "Sauf engin agricole" qui est donc une signalisation locale, non ?
MFlamm (2022-02-14 11:07:03+00:00): Merci beaucoup de ton retour! En effet, il y a de toute évidence une erreur de traduction dans les infos suggérées par l'éditeur, car le wiki de référence est très clair sur la valeur "designated" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated). Je vais comment faire remonter cette info à l'équipe qui développe l'éditeur web.
MFlamm (2022-02-14 11:11:57+00:00): De plus, pour les engins agricoles, il y a un tag spécifique, déjà présent avant ton édition ("agricultural=yes" ;-). Enfin, sur ces voies, il y a le tag général "access=no" qui indique qu'il s'agit d'une voie à accès restreint. Les tags supplémentaires visent donc à préciser les exceptions...
Vickoh51 (2022-02-14 11:14:37+00:00): Je remodifie cela alors :)
Allison P (2022-02-14 16:01:11+00:00): The description tag is not for advertising, and phone numbers must include the country code.
joel1972 (2022-02-14 10:27:18+00:00): Ergänzung: C&A ist schon seit mehreren Monaten nicht mehr in dem Gebäude ansässig.
Layft Greater (2022-03-03 07:59:44+00:00): Hello Dimster! Great mapping session.

However, I have a suggestion to use key "fixme", instead of name=??? for changes, that need further attention.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9504468565

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme

Best Regards,
Layft Greater
JassKurn (2022-02-14 16:26:16+00:00): Hi, I've reverted this change in changeset 117400173. Your change deleted an address, and a business, that are still present. 

I assume this was blunder linked to you adding another business with the name Homeworx.
AndersAndersson (2022-02-14 11:36:31+00:00): Hej!
Denna känns konstig som en link. Jag upplever att det är samma vägklass när jag åker över bron.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48161675#map=19/60.57547/15.60330
Aerond (2022-02-14 11:59:19+00:00): Kanske det... Vad tror du om vägklassen för hela resten av källviksvägen förresten? NVDB sa secondary men lät den vara som innan.
AndersAndersson (2022-02-15 06:04:16+00:00): Secondary känns ju lite stort med tanke på att det inte är någon jättebra genomfart. Det är ju inte så smidigt att ta sig fram där den övergår till Sturegatan och speciellt Myntgatan. Wikie beskrive rju secondary som 2+2 filer. Den är ju långt ifrån det.
Jag tycker tetriary är bäst.
trigpoint (2022-08-20 16:06:54+00:00): Hi. use_sidepath is a very unusual tag to find on a road in the UK. I cannot see any signs indicating this restriction on mapillary. What sources are you using?

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2022-08-29 09:40:56+00:00): No response so reverting
RicoElectrico (2022-02-14 15:13:26+00:00): Cześć, nazwa "Pętla autobusowa" do skasowania: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_u.C5.BCywaj_tagu_name_do_opisywania_rzeczy

surface=kostka to powinno być raczej paving_stones ;) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones