piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alphensebezorger (2020-12-16 17:47:08+00:00): Weet je zeker dat er geen straatnaambordje meer staat? Drie maanden geleden lijkt er toch een bordje met Bosweg te hebben gestaan, als ik Mapillary mag geloven (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/zn3lpHbYMTN32OVRrFEgAu). Waarschijnlijk haalt Google Maps de naam uit het Nationaal Wegenbestand (NWB). Daar staat onder ‘Wegen - wegvakken’ inderdaad Oranje Nassaustraat (zie https://www.pdok.nl/viewer/). Voor OSM is het straatnaambordje bepalend, dus lijkt me name=Bosweg correct, tenzij dat straatnaambordje inmiddels verwijderd is.
CGID (2020-12-16 17:59:56+00:00): Ik leer een hoop bij met zo’n simpele verbetering die geen verbetering blijkt te zijn. Bijzonder interessante wereld waar ik deel van mag uitmaken als beginneling. Ik ga weer kijken en wacht op reactie gemeente. Heb wijziging teruggedraaid. Bedankt..!
Frans S (2020-12-17 09:16:28+00:00): Hello Roger.  Thanks for mapping on this project
Your mappings are quite accurate but are not always squared. Please square each building with the Q key 
Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2020-12-16 15:06:02+00:00): Hello (again)!Again empty ways after delete non standard keys (see https://www.osm.org/changeset/95839223).

Please have a look on this ways: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/11fO
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-14 23:55:29+00:00): A number of your changesets set the roads as tunnels.
zorglubu (2020-12-16 16:42:00+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez supprimé l'étiquette highway=footway sur deux chemins. Je présume qu'il s'agit d'une fausse manip, et qu'il s'agissait de marquer des points barrier=gate ?
L'erreur est humaine :-) Pourriez-vous revoir toutes les étiquettes ?
Et merci de contribuer à OSM.
Carto75 (2020-12-16 21:53:40+00:00): c'était bien une fausse manip de débutant, c'est réglé! J'ai en effet apporté beaucoup de modifications ces dernières 24h.
Question: quand la carte OSM est-elle mise à jour avec toutes les modifications?
zorglubu (2020-12-29 16:07:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Désolé pour la réponse tardive et merci pour la correction.
Vous avez numéroté les maisons, ce qui est très bon, mais il faudrait supprimer alors tous les numéros qui avaient été ajoutés auparavant sous forme de points et qui sont en doublon.
D'autre part, il est important de respecter strictement la casse (majuscules pour les substantifs et adjectifs) dans les addr:street.
Dans l'éditeur ID, la liste déroulante dans le champ addr:street vous propose les noms utilisés alentours. Si vous avez une question, n'hésitez pas :-)
Bonn fin d'année.
ndm (2020-12-18 12:36:02+00:00): What was changed here -- changeset comment doesn't provide any information.
user_5359 (2020-12-17 04:28:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: The combination of house number and street name isn't the name of a building.
whb (2021-06-18 08:08:35+00:00): Hallo emils02,

bitte zukünftig die Freigabe für Radfahrer bei Einbahnstraßen entgegen der Fahrtrichtung für KFZ nicht vergessen.
Die Freigabe habe ich eben hinzugefügt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106573990

Viele Grüße
whb
trigpoint (2020-12-19 15:18:58+00:00): What sources are you using for these edits?

It would be very unusual for speed limits to change right on a junction which seems to be were your edits have them changing. Certainly in this case the 40mph limit neither begins or ends where you have mapped it.

Cheers Phil
vmoura (2020-12-19 15:45:17+00:00): Hi Phil,
Thanks for your help. Yes, it makes a lot of sense. Data is coming from a gps device and I am still new to street maps so I am getting some bits incorrectly.
Cheers,
Vini
trigpoint (2020-12-19 15:51:27+00:00): Hi Vini
A gps device seems a very strange way to map speed limits. 

Were you actually driving to capture these gps traces? If not where did they come from?

Trying to infer legal speed limits from the speed someone was driving at is a bit risky, such things need a proper survey.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2020-12-20 10:41:37+00:00): Your edits are very spread out for an individual mapper, are you working as part of an organised editing project?

Cheers Phil
KartoGrapHiti (2021-12-18 22:26:34+00:00): Dieser Weg hat keine Merkmale. Ist es ein Pfad?
mariotomo (2021-04-02 17:27:16+00:00): hola, la fuente de estos nombres?
BigKev97 (2021-04-03 04:00:12+00:00): ¿No será Bing, Esri, Maxar y Mapillary según el reglamento de no usar otros mapas?
mariotomo (2021-04-03 15:25:02+00:00): disculpa, pero no te entiendo, me estás preguntando a mi? de las fotos aéreas me parece difícil leer nombres de calles, y Mapillary que acabas de mencionar no tiene datos en el área, así que no sé que será, y por eso pregunto.
Anton Khorev (2021-04-06 00:54:34+00:00): I'm still assuming that street names came from Google/Here/Waze because those are all the sources BigKev97 mentioned so far. Thus I redacted names in this changeset too, except for trivial name changes like "Calle 1a Sur" -> "Calle 1ª Sur".

Some of the streets in this changeset were redrawn by another user. I didn't delete their names:  
https://osmcha.org/changesets/100976612/
eggie (2020-12-16 16:19:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

De vraag is wel.. Is je bijdrage serieus hier? Je commentaar is test?
Dekt de vlag de lading? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dpeak


MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2020-12-17 09:24:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Your mappings are rather precise, however not always squared where it is a rectangular building. Please follow the outlines of buildings with an extension in particular more precise
Frans S (2020-12-18 13:13:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here 
Please Square the buildings you map.
See my PM with more information
Best regards and keep mapping
OrDal (2020-12-16 17:56:01+00:00): Hi,
the correct name of El'azar in arabic is إلعازار and not إليعازر. Also, the English name should be El'azar instead of Elazar.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-16 18:29:09+00:00): I didn't touch the English name. I agree with you on that العازار would be more correct. But I got the arabic name directly from the Arabic wikipedia for the settlement. The road sign on Hwy 60 agrees with you too (although there's many cases where the Arabic on the road signs don't match the actual and common Arabic name)
OrDal (2020-12-16 18:54:23+00:00): Yep, I guess someone misspelled in Arabic Wikipedia.
Frans S (2020-12-19 09:26:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Just a remark. Please let nodes of buildings not snap to other features like roads. 
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-12-18 11:32:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here .
A remark.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
lyctkel (2022-06-14 17:30:37+00:00): Hi JTS51,
Ik ben momenteel bezig met ongewone tags in verband met building=*. Voor een gebouw met een pompstation gebruik je building=gemaal (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/621760866, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885598668). Ik denk dat building=service (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dservice ) beter past. Een voorbeeld vind je hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270711775
hartelijke groeten,
lyctkel
lyctkel (2022-06-14 17:36:10+00:00): PS: Ik heb net ontdekt dat dit hier ook wordt gebruikt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195917134
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836063499
dónal (2020-12-16 21:14:16+00:00): thanks. original changeset doesn't explain the source so I think this is a good deletion. :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95953715
trigpoint (2020-12-20 11:10:37+00:00): Are you sure?
aweech (2020-12-17 15:37:59+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your edits. The religious landuse tag is meant for the area immediately around churches, so, if you wanted to, you could add it around the churches, their parking lots, and parks. I changed the area you added for this ward to a religious administrative boundary. 
Happy mapping!
naveenpf (2020-12-20 13:51:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95953944
naveenpf (2020-12-30 03:56:59+00:00): Hello Sanu@123_9A,
this is wrong tagging.
Kuttichal is already mapped.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gram_panchayats_in_Thiruvananthapuram_district 
Can you please remove it?

Thanks,
naveenpf
parsd51 (2020-12-19 22:36:54+00:00): Hej mikkolukas

Såvidt jeg kan se fremgår etaperne af projekttegningerne, ca. midt på siden:

https://www.vejdirektoratet.dk/projekt/udbygning-af-fynske-motorvej/dokumenter-og-kort

Hilsen
parsd51
Luzandro (2023-10-11 05:42:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3932188
Glassman (2020-12-19 18:15:42+00:00): Thanks for adding the sidewalks. If you are interested in adding more detail to the sidewalks by adding in crosswalks and curb cuts, check out my blog https://www.snowandsnow.us/articles/Mapping-Sidewalks-iD/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95955047
Frans S (2020-12-21 12:27:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please be reluctant to map multiple objects as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped individually.
Best regards and keep mapping
ALn_668 (2022-04-19 19:03:22+00:00): Ciao pippo67, il tag "amenity_1" non esiste e non è previsto dalle linee guida. Potresti utilizzarne uno differente o mappare l'ATM separatamente? Grazie!
mascalzone67 (2022-04-19 20:40:25+00:00): Benissimo. Ho visto che hai già fatto. Ciao.
zorglubu (2020-12-17 21:10:39+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre contribution. Si le chemin n'a pas de nom, il est préférable de supprimer l'étiquette "name". Si vous le souhaitez, vous pouvez par contre mettre une étiquette "note=ce chemin n'a pas de nom" à l'intention des autres contributeurs. Bonne continuation.
Frans S (2020-12-19 11:45:40+00:00): Hello Will. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. You mapped clusters of buildings and tagged them as being 1 building. Please map each building individually, 
Square also rectangular buildings with the Q key.
I send you a PM with more info about mapping in general.
Best regards and keep mapping
Branko Kokanovic (2021-08-10 20:47:25+00:00): Zdravo,
Primetio sam dosta tvojih promena gde "zalepis" put za administrativnu granicu (admin=boundary). Npr. u ovom changesetu je to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300989205, ali ima dosta primera. Razumem ja da je to verovatno jer "ko radi taj i gresi", ali eto - cisto da ti ukazem na problem. Pricali smo dugo o ovome na temi: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68288, pa je dogovor da se admin granice ne lepe sa drugim stvarima. Ako se setis nekada ovoga na ubuduce - hvala puno!
moreno96 (2020-12-16 18:40:20+00:00): Hello.
Thank you for editing all of Iran, but your changes have a shortage.
Please write what you have added or edited in map, in comment section, before uploading.
kubahahaha (2023-10-02 20:33:57+00:00): 

Hej, w nawiązaniu do changesetu który komentowałem wcześniej
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119860469

Ten tutaj jest starszy niż ten który wskazałeś. Sprawdzałeś dane z PRNG jakoś ręcznie na paczce z dane.gov.pl?
Nie wpisywałem chyba nigdy nazw ulic z PRNG, zawsze z warstwy Nazwy Ulic z Geoportalu (czy to to samo)?
Betanyahoo (2020-12-16 20:02:08+00:00): Why are you not investigating those plants by yourself? 10 years will pass before somebody has accidentally fixed them.
achillachill (2020-12-19 18:05:26+00:00): Yeah, that's a nice comment. But I don't live in Shetland. But, i'm hopefully, soon in Shetland for holidays. But active corona pandamic makes all a bit different and difficult.

So, I leave this fix me, and if nobody fixes it, I will correct them.
sovereign_ch (2020-12-18 07:23:22+00:00): Bitte unterlasse das Mappen nach veralteten Luftbildern, das ist eine Baustelle und weder ist das nachmappen entfernter Grassflächen erwünscht, noch ein wöchentliches Herumschieben von Fahrbahnen und Gleisen im Zentimeterbereich. Auch ist die Fahrbahnfläche unter dem Shoppi _nicht_ getrennt.

Das Setzen von deskriptiven Namen (Beschreibungen), beispielsweise an unbenannten Strassen, ist schlicht falsch. Auch die Parkhauseinfahrten sind mit ref genügend referenziert.

Und bei tags die du nicht kennst, oder nicht vestehst gilt grundsätzlich: Finger weg! Ebenso bei Elementen mit lifecycle-Prefix (planned, construction, disused).

Den Änderungssatz habe ich rückgängig gemacht. Gewöhne es dir bitte an, den Änderungssatz mit einem aussagekräftigen Kommentar zu versehen, 'Anpassung' oder 'Verbesserung' gehört definitiv nicht in die Kategorie aussagekräftig.
user_5359 (2020-12-16 20:09:17+00:00): Hello again. May I ask again what prevents you from writing a small source instead of Source? JOSM also saves typos, but a correction helps here too. See also https://www.osm.org/changeset/95378872.
majkaz_imports (2020-12-17 08:42:38+00:00): Ahoj, tohle není dobrý nápad. Jako description to nepatří, v podstatě to nepatří do téhle mapy vůbec. Nejlepší řešení by bylo hodit odkaz na web, proti tomu nebude nikdo nic namítat. Jméno samotné taky není ideál, chtělo by to přidat samostatný bod pro firmu s jejím označením.
MosKartograf (2020-12-19 15:42:25+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885442272 !
Mammi71 (2020-12-17 22:20:03+00:00): Hallo daniel_k,
Du hast hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543634112 die landuse - Fläche mit den Wegen verbunden. Diese Methode ist reichlich umstritten, ich möchte Dich bitten, dies nicht zu tun. Die Grenzen der Fläche sind nicht unbedingt identisch mit der Mitte eines Weges.
Zudem wäre es schön, wenn Du auch mal auf changeset-Kommentare reagieren würdest
TomCerts (2020-12-16 19:33:05+00:00): Roads added and aligned in Κάτω Σχολάρι

Maxar Premium Imagery used
joost schouppe (2021-10-22 07:11:00+00:00): You went a little quick when fixing: this parking space way/364691491 is rather big to only fit a single vehicle :)
The main tag was wrong instead.
Rienux (2021-10-22 14:33:52+00:00): Inderdaad mijn fout... Dat was in mijn begindagen van openstreetmap... (kwantiteit over kwaliteit)
francians (2021-04-14 05:03:13+00:00): Ciao Ezio.

Ho visto che hai messo Villaretto come Village, fa almeno 200 abitanti? Viceversa usa Hamlet:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dhamlet

Grazie mille
Francesco
trial (2020-12-18 22:01:19+00:00): Merci je ne comprenais pas pourquoi Osmose râlait : l'erreur venait d'être corrigée et Osmose était en retard ;-).
literan (2020-12-17 16:19:16+00:00): Здравствуйте! букву в адресе правильно писать заглавной: 35А

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
scratera (2021-01-23 11:05:29+00:00): catena montuosa come area? alcuni mappatori hanno tracciato contorni approssimativi di aree che considerano catene montuose. Tuttavia, la forma e le dimensioni di queste aree di solito non sono verificabili. Un mapper potrebbe considerare la catena montuosa per includere tutte le colline pedemontane fino a terra pianeggiante, mentre un altro può considerare solo le parti più alte della montagna nella catena, escluse eventuali piccole valli. Per questi motivi non è consigliabile mappare le catene montuose come aree.
ivanbranco (2021-01-31 18:14:29+00:00): Hi pittrichimica,

I don't understand how can a colour be "disused": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253956818
blackboxlogic (2020-12-16 23:30:01+00:00): Hi, I'd like to help. I've removed the section of the trail that you indicated. I'm sure you know that a well-placed sign can help. If you're trying to "control traffic", it might help to indicate on this map where the parking lot is and make sure that it is connected to the trail head. If you're looking to make local recreation more accessible, I could recommend a number of other changes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95962943
blackboxlogic (2020-12-16 23:34:18+00:00): I just noticed that there is already a parking lot to the south, at the town hall. I'm marking that as public access. Are there others?
HarpswellRecreation (2020-12-16 23:46:54+00:00): That is the only parking area for the Trail. We do have signage out there, BUT with Covid things sort of exploded with trail use. Our town of 4500 was having over 1000 people walking that trail in a weekend. The trail is now in terrible shape from over use. We will be doing a new project in the spring to rehab things. Open Street Map was brought to our attention by a neighbor to the trail via All Trails app. We have been having issues with people on private property for about a year, but couldn't find the specific map that was causing the issue until now.
blackboxlogic (2020-12-17 00:29:06+00:00): It is worth verifying that this boundary is approximately the correct shape?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617234890
Please be aware that changes to this map may take a month to reach consumers.
HarpswellRecreation (2020-12-17 00:34:49+00:00): The boundary is correct and matches the tax map. Thanks for checking!
blackboxlogic (2020-12-16 23:23:13+00:00): Hi, I'd like to help. Currently, that driveway is marked as a residential road (inviting to everyone) but I can change it to a private driveway which will prevent software from telling people to go there. But since I'm not there, I can't tell where the "private driveway" starts and where the road ends. Is it safe to assume that the private section starts here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/101310979) and goes east?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95963209
HarpswellRecreation (2020-12-16 23:44:04+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your help. Yes, you are correct that the driveway starts at that junction and runs east.
eggie (2020-12-16 21:45:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
MoTaBi (2021-08-03 19:47:19+00:00): Hi, bitte access-Werte von Weg 435185110 nochmal prüfen, falls möglich. Hab auch einen Hinweis auf die Karte gesetzt.
Hjart (2020-12-16 22:09:24+00:00): When editing in Denmark please make sure to use our national SDFE aerial imagery, which unlike Bing etc is updated every spring
Kogacarlo (2020-12-17 00:37:21+00:00): Thank you!
Frans S (2020-12-19 13:56:03+00:00): According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
Frans S (2020-12-19 13:57:26+00:00): Hi. 
Another issue
Please map buildings more accurate and not oversized. Follow the oulines more precise and square all rectangular buildings with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2020-12-17 19:26:24+00:00): Hello! You add the tag Add_2_OSM=1 to three nodes. What is the meaning of this tag?
Deane Kensok (2020-12-17 21:44:36+00:00): Thanks for the heads up. That is an internal field indicating where there are conflicts with existing OSM features (at time of data prep). The value of 1 means no conflict and feature can be added. The field was not meant to appear as a potential tag, and was inadvertently included. It has been removed from the two Sioux Falls layers now.
user_5359 (2020-12-17 05:31:47+00:00): Hello (again)!Again empty ways after delete non standard keys (see https://www.osm.org/changeset/95839223).

Also the quality is bad: unconnected and overlapping highways, ... Please work carefully and use the possibilities of JOSM.
laurent-38 (2020-12-17 13:26:03+00:00): Bonjour Largo43,

Tu as modifié l'attribut school:FR sur certains lycées. Or les valeurs de cet attribut sont fortement codifiées, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#type_d.27.C3.A9cole
et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR_talk:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Copie_de_la_partie_.22.C3.80_discuter.22_de_la_page_principale

Si tu souhaites raffiner ces valeurs, je t’invite à le proposer sur la liste de  diffusion (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Canaux_de_contact#Listes_de_diffusion )

Cordialement
~~
laurent
Nmxosm (2020-12-17 10:32:02+00:00): Hallo osmegananop,

vielen Dank für deine Änderung und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Du hast den Bücherschrank als Bibliothek (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=library) markiert. 
Geeigneter finde ich amenity=public_bookcase (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase).

Bei Fragen melde dich bitte einfach als Antwort hier, schreib unter https://forum.osm.org/ oder einer der zahlreichen Mailinglisten (z.B. http://lists.osm.org/mailman/listinfo/talk-de) oder erstelle eine Note (https://osm.org/note/new).

Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir erstmal weiterhelfen.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
osmegananop (2020-12-19 23:29:12+00:00): Hallo Nmxosm,

Danke für den Kommentar, public-bookcase passt viel besser, war mein erser Eintrag, hatte diese Kategorie nicht gefunden. 
Habe es nun angepasst. 

Viele Grüße 
osmegananop
Nmxosm (2020-12-20 09:22:37+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Korrektur.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
ZeLonewolf (2021-01-02 04:53:34+00:00): Hey there - curious about your use of protect_class=22.  There's an emerging consensus to move away from the cryptic numbering scheme and replace them with plain-English tagging.  If you want to chat more...feel free to hit me up on OSM US Slack, username ZeLonewolf.  https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
Frans S (2020-12-19 10:20:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I reviewed your work and am sorry to say that your mappings are rather inaccurate an not squared at all. Did you lost your skills after a few years of inactivity?
I send you a PM with more info how to improve your mappings. 
Best regards and keep mapping.
eggie (2020-12-16 21:49:21+00:00): Dag Bun

Let op dat je de paden die je intekent niet aan de landuse plakt.
Het wordt dan erg lastig om de kaart later nog te bewerken.
Ook lopen een aantal paden over elkaar heen.
Je edits
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-16 22:02:33+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95964370

De paden die over elkaar lagen heb ik opnieuw verbonden en losgemaakt van de landuse. Het zal anders allemaal niet routeren.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-16 22:15:26+00:00): Tip.. Wanneer je de linker alttoets gebruikt tijdens intekenen plakt iD de wegen niet aan elkaar.
mapse verder , eggie
user_2066394 (2020-12-17 22:32:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2020-12-17 06:06:33+00:00): المكان أدخل بشكل متكرر ومرات عديدة وهو موجود مسبقاً نرجوا منكم عدم وضعه مره أخرى هذا يسمى تخريب، أيضاً يمنع استخدام قوقل كمصدر للبيانات
MansourAlotaibi (2020-12-17 07:11:50+00:00): اللقافه شينه ي الاخو 
وهذا من افعال الاحمق يتدخل في كل شيء ويتعالم ؏ غير سنع
نحن نقوم بالادخال 
؏ احياء وحدود القرية لعلها تظهر 
فإن لم تستطع نفع المسلمين فمرورك من غير آثار هو النفع لهم
لكن ما قمت به من إدخال نفسك في كل شيء هو التخريب بعينه