piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ualios (2022-01-31 17:34:09+00:00): Ciao, anche mettendo oneway=no alcuni navigatori leggerebbero ancora il senso unico (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=45.18680%2C7.89470%3B45.18950%2C7.89844#map=17/45.18816/7.89633&layers=N). 
Questo perché qualcuno prima di te ha inserito il tag errato junction=roundabout relativo alle rotatorie che ha di default il senso unico.
Patchanka (2021-12-22 17:57:16+00:00): bonjour
il existe vraiment ce chemin que vous avez ajouté ?
Ou c'était un test ?
eggie (2021-12-14 14:54:47+00:00): Het restaurant staat 3x nu in OSM.
Wellicht kan e.e.a. gecombineerd worden.
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2021-12-25 10:59:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
Tag buildings always as building=yes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114926957
gscholz (2021-12-15 05:19:20+00:00): Hi Lucas,
this changeset has creates errors in theOSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-41.69330&lat=-13.31402&zoom=12&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114926961

Obviously you have shifted way 633708997 to a place where it should not be.
Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2021-12-17 05:42:06+00:00): Hi Lucas,
the error still exits, can you please respond here?
Guido
gscholz (2021-12-19 05:06:03+00:00): Hi Lucas,
thanks for your missing response. I have fixed this error myself now.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115115288

Guido
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-01-13 14:17:07+00:00): Lucas, aqui eu também reverti alguns corregos que voce desenhou muito distantes de onde realmente eles ficam.
SekeRob (2021-12-14 14:30:46+00:00): Yup, restored the farmland rendering \o/
user_5359 (2021-12-15 18:24:41+00:00): Hello! Why did you change the key name:ar to name:türkçe,arapça,kürtçe ? For description the language we use 2 lowercase character short code.
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-14 15:10:01+00:00): Hi, could you please add more meaningful changeset comments?
EP_Repair (2021-12-17 13:17:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115054974 where the changeset comment is: revert deletions of driveway edits as per Ticket#2021121410000072, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5543
VARVAR8 (2021-12-19 20:48:00+00:00): Як я зрозумів ніякого висновку ви з нашої розмови не зробили? Видаляєте далі дані з мапи?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114927416
Tomas_J (2026-04-15 10:50:21+00:00): Ahoj, vseobecne popisy (Pätník Svätojakubskej cesty) nepatria do name.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-18 16:16:15+00:00): Are you sure that you've got the wikipedia link in place for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/599019138 ?  It looks like it was changed from ckb to ar some time ago, but I suspect that ckb would make more sense here.
Can you explain your reasoning for sticking with the ar link here?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-01-14 23:35:02+00:00): (no reply, but), the CKB article does seem to be a bit less "encyclopaedic" than the AR one.
Hevał (2021-12-16 17:52:02+00:00): Oh shit, here we go again.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-18 16:09:38+00:00): Hello user_5359,
You've deleted some wikipedia links from this object.  Presumably you believe that the articles contain the same content, despite people with the languages of those pages being _literally at war over this place_ over the last few years.
Do you have any particular knowledge that either (a) yes, the pages all have the same content or (b) the page you have chosen to represent it is actually the correct one?
For more background, please see some of the changeset comment links from https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/node/248436981 , where both sides of the language debate have put forward their sides of the story.
Best Regards, 
Andy (from the Data Working Group)
Hungerburg (2021-12-15 08:31:07+00:00): Hallo BB,

so gehts nicht, das ist kein Malbuch!
user_14619404 (2021-12-15 18:04:04+00:00): Hallo,
ich habs erst mit einem großen Polygon probiert, das funktioniert nicht.
Soll ich besser mit kleinen Wiesen Flächen beginnen, und mit was dürfen sich solche dann überlappen. Grüße
Hungerburg (2021-12-15 22:43:34+00:00): Hallo BB, das mit der großen Fläche funktioniert schon, man muss nur lange genug warten. Sinn mach das aber keinen, weil openstreetmap ist nicht eine Grafik, in dem Sinn, dass Flächen nach Belieben eingefärbt werden, sondern eine Datenbank von vor Ort auffindbaren Gegebenheiten; so nenn ich das einmal versuchsweise. D.h. Eine Fläche wird als Wiese/Weide dort eingezeichnet, wo eine ist, und nur dort. Zu Überschneidungen kann es da nicht kommen, mit Wald und Äckern nicht, mit Wohn- oder Gewerbegebieten auch nicht, mit so gut wie allem was Fläche ist nicht. Ob mit einer Straße oder einem kleinen Bach, das ist dann eine Frage des Fleißes, so etwas muss nicht so dringend ausgespart werden, und braucht es nach weit verbreiteten Ansichten auch nicht, eher im Gegenteil.
syntex (2021-12-31 18:58:14+00:00): Jaka aktualizacja? Przecież tam jest budowa?
syntex (2021-12-31 19:00:40+00:00): Zestaw zmian został wycofany
Harshil Sharma (2021-12-31 22:51:12+00:00): Thanks mate. I mapped this whole road, and was about to update the geometry in the ending. You did it on my behalf. Genuine thanks :)
SPECTRA995 (2022-04-28 08:46:37+00:00): Hey, Harshil Sharma!
Sorry for the long answer. Happy to help and thank you for your contribution to OSM. Good luck!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 23:30:10+00:00): Agrega un nombre a la ubicación.
MarcoR (2021-12-15 17:54:59+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o!
Occhio che le mappe IGM in genere non possono essere utilizzate per inserire dati su OpenStreetMap. Per maggiori informazioni : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Potenziali_fonti_di_dati#Licenze

A presto,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114927668
andrewsuzuki (2022-07-29 03:41:55+00:00): Hi David, looks good. Some unsolicited tips: with parking lots, make sure to connect any paths/etc with the driveway/service road, otherwise routing apps won't be able to route to the trail. Also, I noticed a few ways weren't actually connected to other ways where it looks like you intended it to (for example, the service road to Church St, which I just fixed). I'm not sure if iD does this but in JOSM editor at least it will give you a warning before you upload with a node that close to another way as 90% of the time it's a mistake. -Andrew
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-12-15 00:22:06+00:00): nem todas vias que voce deletou aqui parecem inexistentes como voce disse. tem certeza dessa edição?
Jamison Souza Freitas (2021-12-15 00:50:06+00:00): Boa noite. São ligações que levam apenas de uma estrava vicinal até o sítio de algum colono. Não ligam uma vila com outra, por exemplo. Acredito que apenas poluam o mapa, pois não são rotas a serem utilizadas pelo público em geral.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-12-15 00:57:07+00:00): estas vias particulares não deveriam ser deletadas, voce ate poderia ter rebaixado a hierarquia delas, mas não deletar, vias privadas são permitidas no projeto.
Jamison Souza Freitas (2021-12-15 01:05:27+00:00): Entendi. Você ter permissão para desfazer as exclusões? Ou devo fazer isso por aqui?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-12-15 01:33:50+00:00): pronto, desfiz, mas fique a vontade para poder remover alguma via que deletou se ela realmente não existir, e as particulares voce pode mudar para serviço ou track se for o caso.
eggie (2021-12-14 15:35:59+00:00): Dad x3

Vaak zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes
Is dat het geval hier?
Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no  en dat evt ook voor moped en mofa
Gr eggie
x3n0n10 (2021-12-15 09:31:11+00:00): Hi eggie, je hebt helemaal gelijk, change incoming!
eggie (2021-12-15 09:34:35+00:00): Oke.. pas je het zelf aan?  
Mapse
eggie
archpdx (2021-12-15 18:06:14+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Addresses are usually placed on buildings or as a point in the center of the building, so I moved the address added to the building. Also note that we separate the address into housenumber, street, city, state, and postcode. We also expand abbreviations (Boulevard instead of Blvd.)
ivanbranco (2021-12-15 15:54:45+00:00): Hi paunofu,

you're adding the tags with the wrong syntax :)

The correct tag is "name:etymology:wikidata", you are using "name:wikidata:etymology", can you fix it?
paunofu (2021-12-15 16:28:37+00:00): Hi,

solved, thanks for notifying me the error.
HolgerJeromin (2022-02-23 04:58:13+00:00): Das war etwas früh, oder?
Die Eröffnung soll im Juni 2022 sein...
HolgerJeromin (2022-02-23 05:03:18+00:00): Habe den shop tag rausgenommen und einen note als Erinnerung angeleg
Carto_Graph (2021-12-14 20:20:01+00:00): Why do you removing information.
Carto_Graph (2021-12-14 20:21:37+00:00): ?
user_5359 (2021-12-14 21:03:02+00:00): Hello! Please read https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia. Wikipedia has an own language link system, so we need no different wikipedia entry.
Carto_Graph (2021-12-15 14:26:42+00:00): Thanks for the information, but you set the Ukrainian language as default, although the local language is de facto Russian.

(Sorry for the bad english.)
mike140 (2021-12-15 17:24:32+00:00): В Украине пишем ссылки на украинскую страницу Википедии - на остальные языки можно при желании перейти
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-18 15:56:53+00:00): Please be aware that such double tagging is used as a solution and workaround for severe conflict.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Donbas for some background

In this case I would give up a bit of tagging purity for peace in community, especially as this information is not incorrect.

This kind of edit is not really helpful.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-12-16 03:01:54+00:00): 朋友你好，很高兴能看到有新的编辑者来到OSM社区
不过请注意，我们在绘制道路的时候，通常选取道路的中心线作为基准，双向两个方向各自独立，因此两个方向的道路应位于其对应方向所有车道的中心上，而非您做出的将其聚集于路口一角。
此外，OSM是一个公开的地图，因此您不需要添加诸如“刘哥的家”之类个人隐私信息。
感谢您的支持。

-----

快乐的老鼠宝宝

自豪的代表OSMChina DataTeam敬上
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114929918
user_10360149 (2021-12-16 03:04:31+00:00): 提示一下，就是您在编辑器右边从上到下第五个按钮，那个三层叠着的按钮，点一下，选择Maxar Premium Imagery，别用必应航空影像，必应的卫星图都是过时的
zc1337 (2021-12-16 14:34:04+00:00): 谢谢楼上两位大佬的建议，第一次用编辑功能，多谢指点！！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114929918
MxxCon (2021-12-15 07:46:11+00:00): It is just New York, not New York City.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114929944
user_10901495 (2021-12-15 10:40:51+00:00): There should be a discussion about this. It's not clear if the OSM community is more in favor in of New York or New York City.
As reported in the note that I linked, the name for New York was changed without a reason.
MxxCon (2021-12-15 12:28:44+00:00): It's about local community preference. It's about accuracy of facts.
ebrelsford (2021-12-16 04:01:04+00:00): The name of the city is New York. As a local and someone who makes maps I strongly prefer New York and I don't understand why we would change it to New York City.
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-16 04:09:50+00:00): Should be just "New York"
nmombo12 (2021-12-17 15:28:51+00:00): Hello jpotas, a fairway with a "cutout" in the middle should be modeled as a multipolygon instead of having a single way approach very close to itself.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples
- Noah
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114930208
nmombo12 (2021-12-19 21:25:40+00:00): For further clarification, specifically I am referring to way 688251137 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688251137) on the 13th hole. There is a guide on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Golf.png) describing the proper usage of multipolygons for this type of feature.
Marcello Perathoner (2021-12-14 22:58:13+00:00): Ciao Tiziano, 

per favore non rimuovere le fermate dei bus perchè dopo è un casino rimetterle e riconnettere tutte le linee. Semmai disconnetti la fermata dalla strada e la sposti da parte (come ho fatto io) finchè non hai finito il resto, poi la riconnetti, così le linee restano intatte.

Saluti, Marcello
Supaplex030 (2021-12-16 08:37:54+00:00): Hallo famosm, du hast hier u.a. Gebäudeumrisse verändert, obwohl diese zuvor sehr genau auf Grundlage von ALKIS-Daten gemappt waren.

Vermutlich hast du das auf Grundlage von Luftbildern getan? Da die Abweichungen sehr gering sind und im Grunde mit den ALKIS-Daten übereinstimmen, würde ich deine Gebäudeänderungen zurücksetzen, damit die Daten wieder genau sind.
famosm (2021-12-16 09:17:40+00:00): Hallo Supaplex,
sag mal bitte welche Gebäude du genau meinst.

Was du sagst kann schon sein, aber wenn du jetzt den kompl. Änderungssatz rückgängig machen willst, da hätte ich schon was dagegen...

Grüße
Supaplex030 (2021-12-16 14:05:18+00:00): Keine Sorge, ich würde nur die Gebäudeänderung zurücksetzen - bzw. der Einfachheit halber den Gebäudeumring wieder "geradebiegen". Sehe auch gerade, dass es nur einen kleinen Bereich betrifft (vielleicht ist es versehentlich passiert - hier die südliche Fassade): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838574262

War eher als Hinweis gemeint, dass die Gebäudeumrisse hier in der Ecke oft sehr genau sind und wenn sie nicht offensichtlich vom Luftbild abweichen, sie eher nicht verändert werden sollten.

Beste Grüße!
Alex
famosm (2021-12-16 16:11:52+00:00): Sorry, aber gerade die Südfassade vom Kiehlufer 67-73 ist krumm und schief - ja, auch in ALKIS.
Aber die nicht 90° Ecken gibt es nicht. War gestern vor Ort und bei g***le streetview kann man es auch sehen.

Meine Zeichnung ist zwar auch nicht korrekt, aber immernoch besser als die vorige. Daher bitte nicht rückgängig machen.

Tatsächlich stehen die Balkone verschieden weit raus zur jew. Hauswand links/rechts. Das werde ich bei Gelegenheit mal fixen - oder kannst du auch machen...

Grüße
Msiipola (2021-12-20 07:53:54+00:00): Det finns en byggnad i Sala som du har ändrat och som överlappar Norrbygatan vid Hyttgatan.  (id:728 718 748)
Förhoppningsvis har du positionskalibrerat din Bing-bild, för annars uppstår sådana här fel.
Jag låter felet ligga kvar, så kan du själv kontrollera och rätta.
Msiipola (2021-12-20 08:12:43+00:00): Jag har nu kollat och ser att byggnaden är felpositionerad. Bing-bilder och andra satellitbilder måste korrigeras för positionsfel innan de används.
hoserab (2021-12-15 18:58:27+00:00): Hi kbzimmer,

Please note that you broke a turn restriction at 33rd Avenue and 21st Street SW. There are barriers allowing only one-way traffic from westbound 33rd Ave to northbound 21st St; the eastbound 33rd to northbound 21st St is restricted by a no-left-turn sign, and southbound 21st St dead-ends at the (marked...) crosswalk at the intersection with 33rd Ave. Northbound traffic approaching the 33rd Ave/21st St intersection must turn left or right on 33rd Ave: there is no straight-through path for vehicular traffic across 33rd Ave.

Please don't delete this, as I can verify these restrictions do in fact exist.

Thanks
wireguy (2021-12-19 18:02:03+00:00): hi VLD083!   your relation cleanup broke relation 13533288.  Please correct, and remember to load incomplete members before running validator.
jujub (2021-12-20 17:24:23+00:00): Thank you for bringing it to my attention, I have fixed it now.
VLD083 (2021-12-20 17:34:32+00:00): Sorry, I commented using my personal account, but the issue has been fixed
eggie (2021-12-14 17:45:41+00:00): Dag Trebbie.. Lijkt me oke zo. 'k Heb wel nog de BAG adresnode gecombineerd met Het Boskamp.
Dan is er maar één adres.
MVG
eggie
dvdhoven (2021-12-14 19:53:21+00:00): Lijkt mij niet oké
Een restaurant oid hoort niet in knooppuntroutes en knooppuntnetwerk thuis.
Ik heb de adresnode uit het fiets- en wandelnetwerk verwijderd.
Als we alle soorten recreaties in de routes gaan stoppen is het eind zoek en hebben we een foutlijst van hier tot Tokio en terug via Timboektoe.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2021-12-14 20:22:16+00:00): Dick bedankt.. Dat had ik nog niet gezien. 
gr eggie
pitfire (2021-12-15 09:53:24+00:00): Hallo tadams,
sind die Parkplatzwege wirklich "surface 	dirt". Hab die eher als "surface 	fine_gravel" in Erinnerung.
tadams (2021-12-15 10:04:18+00:00): Ist bei mir um die Ecke, ich werde nochmal schauen. Da ist allerdings auch gerade viel Baustelle...
abakus_uploader (2021-12-14 23:33:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2021-12-15 05:50:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The combination of boundary=protected_area (for nature conversation) and admin_level (for political structure) is unusal! By the way we don't use a relation to collect one object!
hoserab (2021-12-15 18:20:47+00:00): Hi kbzimmer,

Please refrain from deleting any further unmarked crossings in Calgary. Under the "Use of Highways and Rules of the Road Regulation" (see https://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/Regs/2002_304.pdf , section 1(1)(d)) crosswalks exist at "that part of a roadway at an intersection included within the connection of the lateral line of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway measured from the curbs or, in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the roadway". In plainer English, in Alberta a crosswalk exists between the sidewalks at every corner of an intersection, whether it is marked or not.

You've erroneously deleted crossings which do in point of fact exist, where pedestrians have the right of way and vehicular traffic must yield to them and allow them to cross (refer section 41 of the Rules of the Road).

Thanks
Jordi MF (2021-12-14 23:36:14+00:00): Hola Jose,
Parece que estás añadiendo barrancos con el nombre en una etiqueta incorrecta (gpx:name=*). Es una lástima porque hay un usuario automatizado que se dedica a eliminar esas etiquetas y, por tanto, se está perdiendo el nombre de los barrancos. Para que no ocurra, intenta poner el nombre en la etiqueta name=*.
Saludos,
Jordi
ElliottPlack (2021-12-22 05:03:14+00:00): Hi there. What was "wrong" with these classifications?
xephos1one (2021-12-27 11:36:01+00:00): The trunk classification of US 219 was clearly wrong
And one can argue about US 33 being trunk, the new 2021 Highway Classification Guidance says it's not
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
But as there aren't that many mappers in West Virginia and there are still some questions left I didn't correct the other wrong trunk and primary classifications around Marlinton yet
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-15 09:41:40+00:00): Ciao. Sugli elementi è stato inserito erroneamente il tag contac:website, dove manca una T in contact. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114931623
FreedSky (2021-12-15 15:59:44+00:00): 万山区政府已经办下山了
ff5722 (2021-12-15 16:09:11+00:00): 对不起我没看见了，可以添加note标签
SekeRob (2021-12-14 16:58:11+00:00): Follow Up: This in fact has closed open ends on 2 boroughs, Fusano and Palocco. The outlines on both are now closed.
Walter-NL (2021-12-14 22:25:10+00:00): Mooie primeur Josbert. Ben benieuwd naar de rendering. Er zit nog een klein foutje in: man_made-tunnel vereist level -1, of anders in nieder geval gelijk aan de wegen die er doorheen lopen. Ik vul dat zo even aan.
Walter-NL (2021-12-14 22:39:42+00:00): Schiet me nog te binnen: waarschijnlijk is het "jammer van de rendering"  verholpen door level-1. Ik zie komende vrijdag wel hoe het in OpenFietsMap uitpakt
eggie (2022-01-09 17:12:02+00:00): Dag pa3ems..  Ik heb place_of_worship verwijderd van het gebouw.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114932685

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2021-12-19 11:43:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Please tag buildings just as building=yes
No name tags


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114932995
user_5359 (2021-12-15 17:38:16+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9338124698 an: Spricht irgendetwas dagegen, dass Du direkt office=advertising_agency schreibst?
user_12500175 (2021-12-16 08:10:08+00:00): Hab mir das WIKI nochmal angesehen, dort wird auch die Herstellung von Werbemitteln mit advertising_agency beschrieben.
Habs geändert
user_5359 (2021-12-16 08:13:59+00:00): Danke! Können wir dann auch den Schlüssel advertising_agency=yes löschen?
user_12500175 (2021-12-16 08:20:15+00:00): Ist noch zu früh.....klar kann das dann auch weg
blackboxlogic (2021-12-18 03:04:17+00:00): Thanks for responding to feedback and I'm glad you weren't discouraged. Mistakes are expected, keep making them! On this edit you added opening hours in a human readable way (which is nice, but...). The community has reached consensus and documented a machine readable format which is more friendly for software. I've updated this field to "Mo,Tu,We,Th,Fr,Su 7:00-14:30; Sa 7:00-14:30,17:00-21:00" and I'm 95% sure that I did that correctly? More info at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114934505
blackboxlogic (2021-12-18 03:07:39+00:00): For your reference: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115078385
-Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114934505
ivanbranco (2021-12-22 17:11:59+00:00): Hi Zol87,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978568519/history

there's a typo in parking_space here and in the others spaces of the same row, can you check it out?
BCNorwich (2021-12-14 19:22:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the new building outline because it was duplicating an existing building and also drawn over the car park.

It looks like your business occupies only part of the building, so I've added a POI with your business info.

Regards Bernard.
chris66 (2025-04-01 20:29:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012185817

Da fehlt das building tag ? :)