piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2022-08-19 06:31:21+00:00): Hi ,
this changeset has created an error in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-72.94383&lat=5.72656&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125041175

This "public transport route" does also not comply to our rules how to edit them. Can you please educate yourself about this topic and fix those issues?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-08-21 05:02:23+00:00): Hi Leonardo, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Leonardo Gutierrez (2025-12-08 17:25:05+00:00): I apologize for not responding to this comment earlier. I'm now replying to previous comments that were left unattended; the error has been fixed.
gscholz (2025-12-10 06:46:54+00:00): Thanks for your feedback.
Guido
user_5359 (2022-08-19 12:19:32+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on http://www.osm.org/way/764481092. What is the meaning of the tag _status = operable
?
Two short hints:
* Do you know the HOT key operational_status?
* We have also lifecycle prefix. what we map is ready for use or has a corresponding lifecycle.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_6110846 (2022-08-21 05:08:17+00:00): реверт на польском язьіке будет Bogdana
коль если лезешь в польский язьік то хотяб вьіучи его на базовом уровне
user_6110846 (2022-08-21 05:57:36+00:00): википедия не является аргументом писать бред в етом проекте
iWowik (2022-08-23 06:11:57+00:00): Обсуждение тут: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125028701
Glassman (2022-08-18 23:05:54+00:00): #TIPS: In OSM we spell out street names, for example, 23rd Ln should be entered as 23rd Lane. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. 

Also, according to Thurston County, many of the streets you show as service should be residential. See https://gisdata-thurston.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/thurston::thurston-street-address-tcomm/explore?location=47.027323%2C-122.771198%2C16.18. Basically if even if the street is privately maintained it can be tagged as highway=residential. Service should be limited to roads on private property such as banks, warehouses, shopping centers, etc. 

Please review your edits and if you agree please update the roads. Let me know if you have any questions. I'll send more general info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125042200
Mendelson9 (2022-08-19 02:50:58+00:00): Yes I agree. I originally marked it service since a previous road 19TH LN was already marked service. Will update street tags to residential in neighborhood and update street names.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Chincha1 (2022-08-19 05:31:37+00:00): Hi Meh,
why there are changes in classification??
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125042531
Meh_aR (2022-08-22 05:06:57+00:00): Hi Chincha1,

I have created this road leading to settlements. It should ideally be classified as residential, but I changed it to track because of the community's mapping trend in the neighborhood where most of the dead-end highways are tagged as track due to poor road quality.
Chincha1 (2022-08-22 14:40:34+00:00): do not reclassify the way multiple times Meh
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:57:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Kovoschiz (2022-08-19 11:19:16+00:00): Please don't make features not even funded and tendered as `=construction`.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mapperue (2024-01-28 14:39:21+00:00): Hi,
road like this one
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396920870#map=19/49.49307/19.47026
is tagged as highway=residential. For more information, see the documentation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential
gscholz (2022-08-20 05:44:20+00:00): Hi pinnam_22,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=110.52105&lat=-7.34108&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
pinnam_22 (2022-08-25 05:20:34+00:00): Hi gscholz, thanks for noticing this, ikopanjirukmana has already fixed the issue, but I'll be careful in the future and the Geofabrik geometry validation tool really helps.
Thanks,
Swetha
gscholz (2022-08-25 08:31:27+00:00): Hi Swetha,
thanks for your response.
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-30 10:25:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9960790274/history has shop = smoke that was added in this edit
Is it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dheadshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsmartshop ?

Or maybe it sells e-cigarettes and is shop=e-cigarette ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3De-cigarette )?

Or maybe shop=tobacco is the best fit ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtobacco )?

Or is it a separate shop category that should be documented as valid?
adrianojbr (2022-08-18 19:06:10+00:00): How do I get access to the Maxar SecureWatch Imagery?
BelleIsle (2022-08-19 08:05:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for the question. Apple has an agreement with Digital Globe/Maxar to use their more recent imagery to edit OpenStreetMap, which is not publicly available for editing OpenStreetMap. We generally use the imagery that is already available in JOSM but where we do use that more recent imagery, we always cite it and the date of the imagery is from in the changeset source. Have a good day.
adrianojbr (2022-08-19 11:38:39+00:00): 👍
skquinn (2022-08-18 12:10:13+00:00): Hi,

This appears to be at least the fifth account to make a very similar addition in the greater Houston area. All of them have needed corrections in one or more of the following ways:

1. The opening_hours tag was formatted incorrectly; contrary to popular belief this is *not* a free-form text tag. See <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours?uselang=en>. Note in particular, 24 hour time format and two-day weekdays.
2. The operator=* tag was used incorrectly. From the wiki at <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator?uselang=en>: "The operator tag is used to name a company, corporation, person or any other entity who is directly in charge of the current operation of a map object."
3. The phone number was formatted incorrectly (should be in international format starting with +1).
4. Nonstandard "Category" tag, removed and/or replaced.
5. Abbreviated street names in addresses, which have needed to be replaced.

Also, it would really be appreciated if you would stick to one account for all of these additions. There really is no need to keep making new accounts. Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
BCNorwich (2022-08-19 07:03:00+00:00): Hi, Your new road Way: Department of Geoinformatics to Aniket Canteen (1087130771) is mainly a duplication of existing highways. Also, the tags seem somewhat illogical. Thus I've removed the duplicate way.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:09:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Hufkratzer (2022-08-18 07:55:29+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087131724  sieht im Luftbild aus wie ein Reitplatz, den würde ich auch als Reitplatz taggen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz . Mir scheint, du taggst Reitplätze meistens mit leisure=horse_riding, aber dieses Tag ist für komplette Reitanlagen/reiterhöfe incl. Stall usw. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding.
JM82 (2022-08-18 09:37:41+00:00): Hallo,

Ja, ich wähle jenen Tag, der in JOSM im Vorlagen-Suchen-Menü hinterlegt ist. Dort wähle ich Reitanlage aus.
Hufkratzer (2022-08-18 10:06:23+00:00): Ein einzelner Reitplatz ist aber keine Reitanlage (leisure=horse_riding), so wie im Wiki beschrieben. 
Nach was suchst du denn? Bei den JOSM-Presets wird das Preset für Reitplätze leider nicht angezeigt wenn man nach "reit" sucht. Bei iD ist das besser; da kann man nach "reitplatz" suchen und bekommt dann das Reitplatz-Preset zur Auswahl. Das Problem ist bei JOSM bekannt (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21907#comment:13 ff) und wird hoffentlich irgendwann behoben. Du kannst derzeit in JOSM nach "pferd" suchen, dann bekommst du ein Preset "Pferdesport" angezeigt und da kannst du dann "Reitplatz" (für leisure=pitch) auswählen.
JM82 (2022-08-18 10:13:00+00:00): Ich tippe "reit" im JOSM-Menü ein und dort erscheint nur die Reitanlage, wie ich jetzt genauer sehe.
Diesen geannten Reitplatz habe ich geändert nun. 
Den iD nutze ich seit einiger Zeit nicht mehr.
Werde das künftig im Auge behalten, da mir nicht bekannt war, dass es hier zwei völlig unterschiedliche Tagging Methoden gibt.
josmougn (2022-08-21 12:35:31+00:00): bonjour, vous avez coché "Je souhaite que quelqu'un vérifie mes modifications". A mon avis il ne faudrait pas supprimer ce chemin car manifestement il existe bel et bien.
S'il n'est pas "officiel" c'est peut-être simplement le nom "Sentier des Douaniers" qui est faux et à supprimer.
S'il est interdit d'accès ajouter access=no.
Si la zone traversée est protégée il y a des tags osm à ajouter sur le way de cette zone. 
Cordialement.
ovruni (2022-08-18 06:45:22+00:00): Hola, solamente se debe de poner nombre a un objeto cuando tiene un nombre particular, "Parque" no es el caso, en ese caso no debe de ir el nombre.
Saludos
paganella31 (2023-03-01 20:51:56+00:00): source: survey
ovruni (2022-08-18 06:48:09+00:00): Hola, los objetos con area:highway deben de colocarse solamente como vías envolventes de una vía highway existente, para detallar la forma de un highway. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
Saludos
julcnx (2022-08-18 07:00:22+00:00): FYI: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
ChychykliaRiver (2022-08-19 20:00:35+00:00): Hello cmoffroad, thank you for sharing the OSM guidelines for changeset size. I usually keep my edits in a changeset to the same local area, but it looks like I uploaded these two different areas in the same changeset in this edit. Happy mapping!
gscholz (2022-08-20 05:43:25+00:00): Hi padhyalasairam_22,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=111.41898&lat=-6.97212&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Warin61 (2022-08-18 23:28:38+00:00): Hi,
This changeset was partially reverted to restore the shape of the Sydney Opera House, the change made the roof cross itself. 

The changeset comment 'Sydney' is not very informative... what were you doing? And what is the source of the changes? 
I note that there were changes to some administration boundaries ..
Warin61 (2022-08-18 23:41:34+00:00): Ar ... you used bing. We have more accurate data than that...
eggie (2022-08-18 07:17:58+00:00): Kees... tip...  In de brandgangen heeft niemand iets te zoeken. 
Om te voorkomen dat het ongewenst gaat routeren. Niemand wil een route via brandgangen. 
Je kunt dan deze op slot zetten met access=private. access=destination zie ik ook wel.  Formeel hoort een brandgang bij de woningen en is dus prive met recht van overpad.

MVG
eggie
Srdjan023 (2022-08-20 17:26:38+00:00): Da, ali zašto si obrisao deo put onda ne može da se napravi polukružno skretanje?
Srdjan023 (2022-08-20 17:28:19+00:00): Trebao si da dodaš restrikciju
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Srdjan023 (2022-08-20 17:35:33+00:00): Ništa izvini moja greška
gscholz (2022-08-20 05:45:11+00:00): Hi padhyalasairam_22,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=109.69229&lat=-7.37819&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
padhyalasairam_22 (2022-08-23 04:35:29+00:00): Hi gscholz, thank you flagging this issue, I found that ikopanjirukmana already fixed the duplicate nodes, I'll carefully check the validation warning to avoid such cases in the future. 
Thanks and regards,
Sairam
4004 (2022-08-20 18:41:51+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
в название пишется имя собственное. то, что это полевая тропа вы уже указали другими тегами
Atmayoni das (2022-08-22 08:28:39+00:00): Добрый день. Хотел, чтобы было какое-то описание. Может и лишнее.
Я вроде футпас делал. На самом деле там дорога для сельхоз техники. Машина там не проедет, только трактор или внедорожник. Кое-где давно не ездила техника, но ходят люди
4004 (2022-08-22 13:22:28+00:00): вот я в описание (description) и перенес.
переделаю под полевую дорогу
user_5359 (2022-08-18 11:19:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2022-08-18 07:34:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-18 07:37:27+00:00): Dag BAW  Weet je ook hoe het met het wandelpad zit hier?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-18 09:23:03+00:00): De Kanaalweg zelf  en het wandelpad  stond nog deels op slot met access=no  Ik heb die regels verwijderd.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-08-18 08:41:23+00:00): Beste Martin,

Wanneer hier geen zichtbare wegen zijn (Het is immers voetgangersgebied) lijkt het me ook een mogelijkheid on een highway=pedestrian te gebruiken met dezelfde tagging.
Het hele gebied kan dan ook nog ingetekend worden als vlak highway=pedestrian area=yes. (Net als bij het station)
De highway=pedestrian tbv de routering valt dan weg in de rendering, maar functineert wel als route.
M.i. hoort dan emergency=yes ook nog op de highway=pedestrian.

.... service=emergency_access  is volgens mij niet correct hier.
Die zie je bv wel bij doorsteken naar de snelweg tbv de hulpdiensten.

Dus in het kort...
Een vlak 
highway=pedestrian met area=yes

en voor de routering highway=pedestrian als lijnelement met de bovenstaande tagging. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-08-20 06:13:13+00:00): Dag Martin..

Ik heb een draadje geopend op het forum..
Je zou er even nota van kunnen nemen en evt op kunnen inhaken.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=869980#p869980

MVG
eggie
fabiotofy (2022-08-18 08:33:58+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto. Nel tag name non ripete informazioni già presenti negli altri attributi (stazione di ricarica e-bike non serve). Anche la nomenclatura "DINACLUB" la sposterei tutta nel campo "operator". ciao ciao
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125047162
Austrianton (2022-08-18 21:49:59+00:00): Please keep single change-sets local, to avoid spamming the history-feed over large areas. Thanks
lefuturiste (2022-08-18 11:49:38+00:00): If possible it would be great if you could review for each node, what actual name are these monuments named.
iWowik (2022-08-19 06:31:30+00:00): День добрый!
Садоводство это не улица
1) пишется в addr:place
2) без сокращений в точности как в name самого садоводства
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9960914887/history
ljc_jlyb (2022-08-18 08:43:47+00:00): Please revert this changeset since this does not exist
user_5359 (2022-08-19 12:10:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short generell hint: Please use the key building instead of buildings.
Ygramul (2022-08-22 21:14:58+00:00): Hello. You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9960937923 this node, which seems to be a shop node with lots of typos. However, there's already a shop mapped in nearly the same location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3079591732 ... Has that perhaps been a mistake?
fabiotofy (2022-08-18 08:34:55+00:00): ciao, attento all'ortografia 8 -> o "La Magnifica C8munita di Aquileia"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125048429
fabiotofy (2022-08-18 08:40:20+00:00): Ciao, il nome ufficiale del "Ponte della Schiusa" è in realtà "Ponte Egidio Bullesi o anche Ponte Bianco"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125049270
Pavol33 (2022-08-18 09:33:35+00:00): grazie cambiato
DD1GJ (2022-08-20 10:14:50+00:00): Hallo fhofer,

Du trägst momentan bei sehr vielen Industrieanlagen Ammoniak und Methan ein. Was ist Deine Absicht? Was ist Deine  Quelle?

Ich halte die OSM-Rohdanten für den falschen Ort, um etwas wie ein Register chemischer Stoffe aufzubauen. Bei der BASF werden sicherlich tausende chemischer Stoffe produziert.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
fhofer (2022-08-22 05:46:16+00:00): Hallo Joachim!

Hatte das gerade für meine Firma als Suchfeld inkludiert, basiert auf einer firmeninternen Liste. (Haben eine OSM Map in unserer Website)
Im Nachhinein betrachtet hätte ich aber auch einfach alle Industrieanlagen herausfiltern können. Ich denke ich werde dies ohnehin wieder revidieren. 

Mfg
fhofer (2022-08-22 06:46:43+00:00): Sollte nun wieder passen, danke für das Feedback!