piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pio2_122 (2020-08-17 16:11:08+00:00): 1) Lepszym tagiem do oznaczenia źródła numeru jest "source:ref", a nie "source". W tagu source były już gdzieniegdzie inne informacje, które w ten sposób zostały usunięte. Moim zdaniem, źródło wystarczy podać w opisie zestawu zmian.
2) Dlaczego w old_ref dodany został numer 104?
Z dyskusji pod jednym z changeset'ów wynika, że w terenie droga nie była tak w ogóle oznakowana.
old_ref=104 powinien być użyty tylko na byłej DW 104 w woj. dolnośląskim, gdzie to oznakowanie faktycznie występowało. Obecne rozwiązanie będzie raczej tylko wprowadzać w błąd.
3) Nadal pozostał przynajmniej jeden fragment drogi, gdzie oznaczenie nie zostało poprawione.
4) Wcześniej występował odcinek oznaczony jako ref=112;163 - teraz został oznaczony tylko jako 112 - chyba błędnie.
__
Swoją drogą: nadal nie ma jasnej informacji odnośnie oznakowania tego odcinka. Artykuł ze strony ZZDW podany w tagu source nie daje bezsprzecznego potwierdzenia faktu oznakowania tego odcinka.
W związku z tym, według mnie, nadal nie ma podstawy i źródła do takich zmian - a niestety dokonałeś tego bez żadnej dyskusji...

Mimo wszystko, przywróciłem stan z https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88618841
Yunkers (2020-08-20 19:22:01+00:00): Ja bym się tym aż tak nie przejmował, niestety lub stety, standardem w Polsce jest tagowanie refów według "papierka". Ma to swoje wady i zalety, ale tym razem ten "papierek" jest wiarygodny, więc dla mnei jest okej.
azakh-world (2020-08-19 19:51:47+00:00): Hi.
What did happen with Rochusgasse U-Bahn station? Is it closed? Does not N75 bus stop there anymore?
You removed an important object and changed complex relations so I'm asking was it intentional or accidental.

Best regards,
Alexey
Kay Burki (2020-08-20 08:34:04+00:00): Hi Alexey, thanks for pointing at that, I did check, but it abviously went wrong. No I only wanted to remove the N75 from Rochusgasse, since it stops around the corner and not there. Is there a possibility of putting the knot back in, since it is all there: Rochusgasse (3256990, v15).
Best
Kay
azakh-world (2020-08-20 11:33:38+00:00): I've undeleted the station node 69468988 and put it back into stop_area relation.

Searching https://wiki.osm.org by "undo" or "undelete" word will lead you to one of the pages about change revert. In this case I used "undelete" plugin for JOSM editor.

In difficult cases you may always ask for help on one of the forums/messenger groups or appeal directly to a more experienced mapper. wiki.osm.org is often a good start point to search solutions or contacts.

Best,
Alexey
VitalieS (2020-09-22 21:32:01+00:00): Bună, 
Cele două locații leisure=playground (zona și punctul) reprezintă același loc, deci ar putea fi fuzionate, nu?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89522729
opendcc (2020-08-17 18:27:23+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Bitte achte doch darauf, vorhandene Dinge wie z.B. hier eine Freileitung nicht mit Feldwegen zu verbinden. Wenn Du Fragen hast, darfst Du Dich gerne melden.

Servus
aceman444 (2020-09-11 05:22:39+00:00): Zdravim, preco anglicky preklad? Pochybujem, ze takyto objekt ma oficialny anglicky nazov. Ak ste si ho len vygenerovali cez prekladac, tak takyto vymysleny nazov do OSM nepatri.
*Martin* (2020-09-11 07:27:48+00:00): Osobne nevidim nic zle na takomto preklade v ramci "map internationalization". Ani vo wiki som nenasiel nic proti tomu.
*Martin* (2020-09-11 07:29:51+00:00): Jedine ze slovo "pamatnik" a "monument" by v nazve byt nemusel kedze ho vyjadruje tag historic=memorial. Takze len name="Bulharským partizánom", name:en="Bulgarian partizans", ...
aceman444 (2020-09-12 19:33:11+00:00): Mne sa prave zda, ze wiki bola proti tomu, lebo tam taky nazov proste nie je. Ale tiez to teraz nevidim. To, ze napr. velke mesta maju aj inojazycne nazvy, to ano, lebo sa tak oficialne pouzivaju (maju to tie staty v slovnikoch), alebo ambasady maju na dverach nazvy aj v jazyku ich statu, tak tie davame aj do OSM. Ale nie kazdy kamen na Slovensku ma oficialny cudzojazycny nazov, iny ako len otrocky preklad ci transliteraciu.
*Martin* (2020-09-12 19:45:48+00:00): Preklad je podla mna OK. Ak ma nieco name "Martinov prameň" tak za mna je ok tam dat preklad do name:en="Martin's spring".
aceman444 (2020-09-12 19:58:22+00:00): Podla mna to nie je OK. A co ked to ma byt "Martin spring" alebo "Spring of Martin"? Je to subjektivny a neoveritelny nazor konkretneho prekladatela, takze podla definicie to do OSM nemusi patrit.
*Martin* (2020-09-12 20:03:29+00:00): Nie. Ma to byt preklad "Martinov pramen". Nic viac. Anglican nevie co je "pramen". Ak sa ta anglicky kolega spyta, ze ako sa vola ten pramen, co mu povies? Uz vidim:
- Hey, what's the name of this spring?
- Dude, it is Martinov prameň
- Huh?
*Martin* (2020-09-12 20:07:02+00:00): Preklad "Martinov prameň" je "Martin's spring".

Preklad "Prameň Martina" je "Spring of Martin".

Žiadna veda. A nejaky pramen niekde v lese sotva bude mat uradmi evidovany nazov.
aceman444 (2020-09-12 20:10:53+00:00): A co je zle na tom, ked sa povie kolegovi nazov "Martinov pramen" ? Preco by sa mu to malo prekladat a mat to nejaky vyznam? Je to predsa nazov.
*Martin* (2020-09-12 20:12:26+00:00): Nie je na tom nic zle, ale budes asi 1 zo 100 co to tak podla mna nestastne "prelozia".
*Martin* (2020-09-12 20:14:47+00:00): A idealne nazov je vlaste v tomto pripade "Martin". Softver by uz mal "dopocitat" ze v SK je to "Martinov pramen" a v EN "Martin's spring". Proste dat to slovo do genitivu, avsak asi v mnohych jazykoch by bez subjektu to vyzeralo divne.
aceman444 (2020-09-12 20:18:25+00:00): No ved ale prave o to ide, ze to ide nestastne prelozit. Ked si tie name:en zacne vymyslat niekto kto nevie poriadne po anglicky, budu rovnake spravne ako ked ich zacne prepisovat niekto kto vie po anglicky. Nie je mozne rozhodnut co je spravne, kedze nie je oficialny nazov. A co sa neda overit na mieste nepatri vraj do OSM.
*Martin* (2020-09-12 20:30:28+00:00): Ked niekto nevie nieco poriadne a zacne to robit, tak moze pokazit uplne hocico. Preto teraz nebudeme vsetko mazat.

Vela nazvov nezistis na mieste. Rozne pomniky nemaju nazov lebo je na nich len dlhsi text. Ale do name dame napr. "SNP", alebo "oslobodenie obce Vojany".

Alebo ani nazvy ako "Pamatni Ludovita stura" na mieste nenajdes. Najdes tam mozno text "Ludovit Stur". Takze name je teraz zle?

Jednoducho si nemyslim ze tie preklady su zle. Idealne by to bolo vydiskutovat v tagging mailing liste a az potom "konat".
aceman444 (2020-09-12 20:40:40+00:00): No ked su tie nazvy SNP ci "oslobodenie" nenajditelne na mieste, tak ja ich do OSM nedavam. Ano, dal by som tam "Ludovit Stur". Ak tie nazvy niekto da, musi nalinkovat dost dobry zdroj, ze sa ozaj tak volaju. Nesmu to byt nahodne opisne nazvy. A "prelozil som si to v hlave" do nahodneho jazyka sa mi nezda ako dost dobry relevantny zdroj.
*Martin* (2020-09-12 20:48:27+00:00): Tak neviem, ale keby vsetci takto puritansky mapovali, tak tie mapy by boli dost prazdne. Takmer ziadne nazvy potokov jazier a pod., pamatniky bez nazvov (lebo nazvy vlatne nemaju), ziadne nazvy kopcov, ...

Mne to trochu pride ze si mylis tag "name" a "official_name".
aceman444 (2020-09-12 21:07:13+00:00): No ja len nechcem aby si tie nazvy ludia vymyslali, aby sme mali rovnaky bordel ako Google maps, kde su nazvy uplne nepouzitelne, v nahodnych jazykoch po Slovensku, obsahuju komentare a pod.
aceman444 (2020-09-12 21:11:20+00:00): Ked riesime na fore, ci dat nazov ulice spravne, alebo tak ako je napisany aj s preklepmi na tabuli na mieste, tak myslim, ze  toto moje je omnoho menej puritanske :)
*Martin* (2020-09-13 06:48:19+00:00): Vporiadu, ale tento konkretny pripad to podla mna nie je.
Blavak (2020-09-22 19:52:00+00:00): Aceman, ja viem vyborne po anglicky. A súhlasím, pokiaľ je názov kostrbatý, tak ho možno upraviť. Prípadne zmazať tam, kde sa nehodí.
aceman444 (2020-09-22 19:55:49+00:00): No nazov by nemal byt kostrbaty, ani by nemal byt nahodne upravovany ako sa komu hodi, mal by z niecoho jasne vyplyvat.
Ked viete vyborne po anglicky, prelozite vsetky objekty na Slovensku aj do anglictiny len tak preventivne, kde sa to da? Alebo naopak doplnite vsetkym objektom v USA name:sk kde sa Vam to podari nejako prelozit, lebo ved preco nie? Podla mna by v tom malo byt nejake pravidlo.
aceman444 (2020-09-22 20:00:55+00:00): *Martin*, ano tieto preklady su este horsi pripad. Nie su na vyber dve moznosti (oficialny zdroj alebo preklep na tabuli) a na jednej z nich sa treba zhodnut, ale tu je milion moznosti, podla toho ako si kto veri, ze vie vyborne po anglicky.
ottwiz (2020-08-17 14:19:45+00:00): ... és erdők, fasorokat is berajzoltam még
aceman444 (2020-10-19 16:41:19+00:00): Francuzska restauracia bolo asi spravne (https://www.hoteldevin.sk/francuzska-restauracia), L'Art je napisane na vedlajsom hoteli Park Inn.
aceman444 (2020-10-19 17:24:39+00:00): A otvaracie hodiny sa nezapisuju po slovensky, ale anglickymi skratkami dni, pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. Dakujem.
CoyKoi (2020-08-19 21:45:24+00:00): Please note the LINZ imagery you are using is out of date - there has been a major rebuild of the mall and the service roads have been removed
azsr (2020-08-19 01:32:55+00:00): Hi Patrick,
I'm unsure if you're tagging these ways correctly. You've tagged almost all of these roads in this and your previous changesets as "highway=residential", but my understanding is that, for minor roads like driveways and parking aisles, they should be tagged "highway=service". Could you please review your previous five changesets?
Always open for discussion,
David (azsr)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89523905
olo81 (2020-08-19 14:39:01+00:00): Chyba pomyłkowo skasowałeś amenity=hospital
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202025546
zuicz (2020-08-19 19:22:31+00:00): Poprawione
habi (2020-08-24 10:59:47+00:00): Please do *not* add unnecessary `name`-tags to the buildings you map.
I removed all the "name=#cognizantcountry" from your several changesets.
guillemmal (2020-08-22 01:18:03+00:00): Dear,

I am a local mapper and the direction of the street was correct. It was approved by local regulation about 6 months ago. Please do not make changes without consulting.

Regards
Guillermo
Nodestrawaymus (2020-08-24 15:52:30+00:00): Thank you for correcting the error and providing information.

Thank you,
Nodestrawaymus
aceman444 (2020-10-19 12:55:24+00:00): Zdravim, podla coho ste pridali restauraciu NOCU v auguste 2020? Podla tejto stranky https://enjoy.trend.sk/restauracie/jedna-naj-novych-restauracii-konci uz davno skoncila v 2019, a dnes (10/2020) som ju tam tiez nevidel. Ako zdroj uvadzate len Bing, kde samozrejme restauracie nie su vidiet.
Blavak (2020-12-14 20:48:13+00:00): asi som to nezaregistroval, treba opravit.
aceman444 (2020-12-16 21:52:50+00:00): Co ste nezaregistrovali? Ze kreslite nieco co tam nie je? Alebo tam v skutocnosti bola a webstranka sa myli?
pio2_122 (2020-08-17 16:13:02+00:00): Podane źródło podaje wręcz przeciwne informacje "Do Powiatu Białogardzkiego trafiła natomiast niemal cała DW nr 166. Jest to nieco ponad 7-kilometrowy łącznik pomiędzy Białogardem, a dawną DK6  /obecnie DW 112/. Na mapach odcinki te oznaczono kolorem brązowym)."
___
Zmiana wycofana
PT-53 (2020-08-18 05:26:35+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
Du hast an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318134946/history
das Merkmal
lcn=yes
ergänzt.
Falls Du diesen Weg abgefahren bist, wäre es schön wenn Du noch die Merkmale
tracktype=*
surface=*  und
smoothness=*
ergänzen könntest.
Grüße
rainerU (2020-08-19 06:58:54+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

ich war nicht selbst vor Ort sondern habe mich auf Mapillary-Bilder gestützt. Auf dieser Basis habe ich den vorhandenen Weg, der kurz vor dem Bahnübergang ohne Verbindung zur Straße geendet hat, verlängert und den Bahnübergang für Fußgänger eingetragen. Da nur ein kleiner Teil des Wegs auf Mapillary zu sehen ist, würde ich erst mal keine surface und smoothness eintragen. Man könnte aber aus den Luftbildern schliessen, dass der Weg durchgängig gleiche Qualität und Oberfläche hat.

Das lcn=yes basiert auf einem Wegweiser etwas südöstlich am anderen Donauufer, der auf anderen Mapillary-Bildern zu sehen ist.  

Grüße
Rainer
PT-53 (2020-08-19 10:19:20+00:00): In Odrnung.
Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-08-19 11:06:18+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180528054/history
hat keine Merkmale mehr.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
rainerU (2020-08-19 12:09:33+00:00): Das war ein Versehen. In diesem Bereich sind die Luftbilder veraltet Die Mapillary-Aufnahmen sind aktuell, haben aber sehr schlechten GPS-Daten. Trotzdem scheint mir der Weg eher ein Zufahrtsweg zu sein als ein Radweg mit Zeichen 240. 

Ich habe den Weg daher wieder auf highway=path gesetzt, ohne bicycle/foot=designated. Außerdem habe ich  die Verbindungen zwischen der Volkersheimer Straße und dem parallelen highway=service korrigiert. Zwischen der Volkersheimer Str. 16 und dem Karpfenweg 5 ist noch ein Gebäude entstanden, dass man bei Mapillary (und Google Maps) sieht aber nicht auf den OSM-kompatiblen Luftbildern und auch nicht auf Maps4BW. Das sollte aber jemand einzeichnen, der vor Ort war.
will_p (2020-08-17 15:23:32+00:00): Hi,

I notice you are changing a lot of bus stop names. I've found several examples where these names differ from what I have recently seen on the ground. What source are you using and have you confirmed they have really changed?

For example, I surveyed this one about 5 months ago:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4033900789/history

The name then was definitely:
Station Road
High Lane West

You have changed it to 'Crossroads'. I note this is the name given in the NaPTAN data, but the Derbyshire NaPTAN data does frequently differ with what is on the ground, and it's what is written on the stop that should be used.

Thanks,
Will
Edward Smith (MilPop14) (2020-08-17 16:36:22+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your comment. I am indeed retrieving the names of bus stops from NaPTAN data. I am aware that there can be some variation as to what is in the database and what is actually displayed on the bus stop. I have checked up on the wiki for the name key and you are right in that it should be the name as displayed at least in the case of disputes.

When adding a new bus route I tend to review all bus stops along the route to check first that they have been mapped, secondly that they have the required tags and thirdly the name of the bus stop.

Where the name of the bus stop is different from the NaPTAN data set I tend to use my judgement on which is the most likely / appropriate. It can be difficult to distinguish between cases where the bus stop name has actually changed and cases where a different name is used on the bus stop to the NaPTAN data set. The easiest to distinguish tend to be bus stops which were previously named after pubs which have since shut down. The most difficult to distinguish tend to be stops where different intersecting streets are referenced.

Another complication is the inconsistency in bus stop naming. Bus stops tend to be named after an intersecting road though some mappers also include the road the bus stop is actually on or the area in which it is located at the beginning. I believe that in the context of OpenStreetMap it is relatively easy to see this information and that it would best to keep bus stop names concise to prevent the map from appearing overly cluttered. I do acknowledge that some bus stops do actually physically display this.

I believe it would be impractical to individually survey every single bus stop each time adding a bus route to the map though it would appear in the example that you have given that I have got it wrong in this instance. Sorry about the removal of the Rose and Crown bus stops – that was a mistake. I will get these two issues rectified now and be more cautious with the renaming of bus stops in the future.

Kind Regards,
Edward S (MilPop14)
will_p (2020-08-18 15:38:34+00:00): Hi,

I appreciate your quick response and the correction of the issues I pointed out.

I have restored recently surveyed stop names so they match what is on the ground. I appreciate there will be different opinions on how to tag stop signs which use the format 'street / landmark'. I have surveyed well over 100 stops including both parts in the name tag and I don't think they should have remotely been changed to another format without any discussion.

In cases where the names were surveyed several years ago, I have left the name you added, although I have spotted some I suspect are wrong.

Recently I have deliberately focussed on surveying stops in Derbyshire rather than Nottinghamshire because the NaPTAN data is much poorer quality there. The data in much more likely to match what is on the ground in Nottinghamshire. Also, I may be wrong, but I don't think the released Derbyshire NaPTAN data has been updated for about two years. There are places near me where the stops were reconfigured a while ago and this is still not in the data.

A couple of other observations:
Please don't delete both_ways=yes from stops. This is useful information indicating the stop on the other side of the road doesn't physically exist.

You appear sometimes to be deleting benches near bus stops. Personally I never separately map benches inside bus shelters, however, I do map benches near bus stops that look likely to be used by people not waiting for a bus and I don't think these should be removed.

Regards,
Will
Edward Smith (MilPop14) (2020-08-18 18:20:38+00:00): Hi,

Thanks once again for your response. On further thought I believe you are right in that I should not have renamed the bus stop names. From now on I only intend to change the name of bus stops if the name is clearly wrong. I will simply add in any missing bus stops and names to those without one already.

On the topic of both_ways tags my reasoning for removing them was due to there being no documentation, at least as far as I am aware, on the wiki about them. It does appear to be a bit of a grey area. The approach I was taking was to add a bus stop node on both sides of the road for each direction anyway. Perhaps a better approach then would be to just add a node where there is an actual pole and then tag the same stop node in both directions in the route relations? I do think that both_ways tags would be a good addition. I suppose even if they are not documented on the wiki that there is no harm in having them anyway.

Finally on the topic of benches you are likely also correct. In some circumstances I have found the benches to be pretty much in the exact position of the stop node hence the change though yes thinking about it those not right next to the stop pole or in a shelter could be used by anyone so keeping them separate would be best.
I want to apologise for wasting your time in having to change things back. I very much appreciate your feedback and will be much more cautious about modifying things in the future.

Kind Regards,
Edward S (MilPop14)
Frans S (2020-08-17 14:52:18+00:00): Hello Hhuberla

Subject: Hidden already mapped buildings in iDeditor

Hello. Thank you for mapping out this project.
Due to a problem in iDeditor, many buildings/roads are currently drawn double or triple.
Cause is an error in IDeditor which causes the already drawn buildings to remain invisible.
Note the bottom line in iDeditor. There's a blue field in there that says ... If you have hidden objects, you need to zoom in further. It may happen that the field does not disappear.  Then find another task to work on.

See this picture
![hidden features] (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yoGFziHyq49yKKqKbu81mefyBQZ6TqPH/view?usp=sharing)
Frans S (2020-08-17 14:54:26+00:00): Hi. 
Another issue
You map tall buildings on a wrong way
Just map over the roof and move the mapping to the footprint.
See these hints how to map tall buildings as well as other hints 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub

Best regards
hhuberla (2020-08-17 16:08:51+00:00): Thanks Fran - I thought I was mapping the base of the building but I did it using the two visible base corners and then extrapolating, not try to map the roof and then 'move' it to where the base is.  I will try that next time.

Should I take another square or should 
I be going back in here to remediate?
azsr (2020-08-18 16:22:40+00:00): Thanks for making the changes promptly!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89525297
wireguy (2020-08-17 17:03:44+00:00): I think the path should be highway=footway.  I believe pedestrian is used for things like closing a street to car traffic and making into a walking plaza, like Division street in downtown Somerville.
murph (2020-08-17 17:10:27+00:00): I didn't actively choose highway.  I removed the tag, and tied to mark it as pedestrian, and it re-added the highway ta back.  Working on it.
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2020-08-20 05:09:08+00:00): Привід для дуже цікавої дискусії.
MCDA (2021-03-22 19:27:09+00:00): Why are you upgrading tiny back road to tertiary?!? Please read - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland/Roads/Local_roads and/or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Northern_Ireland for roads in the North !!
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:45:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89526048
user_5359 (2020-08-17 18:09:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags
CITY=NANA VILLAGE
SETTLEMENT=NANA VILLAGE[COLLECTIVE SETTLEMENT
lGA=GIREI
state=ADAMAWA
 in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
user_5359 (2020-08-19 14:45:23+00:00): You can add an address (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr, normally you have a street name and a house number) or you can add a place (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place, if you want to notice the relation ship to county and country, you can use the is_in key (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in)

Don't use CITY or state!
And again what is the meaning of IGA?
Frans S (2020-08-18 09:05:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please map buildings more accurate
Don't map the courtyared including trees

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub

Best regards
computerfan0 (2020-08-17 15:31:44+00:00): Sources: NI road list, Sabre
Puxan (2020-08-26 09:48:46+00:00): En el proyecto HOT 8823, tesela 1404. Aparecen edificios sobrepuestos a los que ya estaban mapeados, por lo que revierto el cangeset correspondiente al último mapeador
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89527481
mueschel (2020-08-19 09:12:10+00:00): Hi,
could you check this area, it got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/837923173
NoNameX (2020-10-04 02:09:41+00:00): Hallo mrJTwo,

I have some questions to you.

Why have you deleted all buildings in Leticia ? For example: the buildings of the Hotel Decameron had been very detailed. Now it is only a swimming pool there.

You have changed some landuses from  wood to wetland. Why ? Especially the one near the market ?

You use a a lot of landuse residental, retail ,commercial etc. How to you know which buildings belong to which area ? Do you guess ?

Some items are now twice like the 
The Museo Etnografico. Why ?

Have you ever been in Leticia ?

Can you explain me in general, what do you think is your improvment ?

I cannot see any improvement. Before it was very detailled with a lot of buildings (sometimes bad I know) but now it looks like a desert.

Best Regards

NoNameX

P.S. If I did not get any response the next days I will revert your changes.