piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Alecs01 (2017-01-06 08:39:44+00:00): Scusate se mi intrometto, ma mi pare che "Tutti sono invitati a utilizzare i nostri sentieri per andare in bicicletta" e "non pubblicare i nostri sentieri sui siti web pubblici" sono palesemente in contraddizione tra loro. Non è un granchè come argomento per cancellarlo dire che qualcuno ne fa un cattivo utilizzo, così facendo non lo si nasconde solo a loro, ma a tutti. Non ha senso dire che un sentiero è pubblico, ma non si può pubblicare, non ti pare? Con che diritto ne impediresti la pubblicazione? Io lo ripristinerei senz'altro, ho scritto anche a chi lo aveva disegnato per primo comunque.
sabas88 (2017-01-08 20:37:52+00:00): 1. Il sentiero è stato tracciato da una traccia gps pubblica
2. Se deve essere impedito l'accesso, l'accesso deve essere impedito fisicamente, non cancellandone le tracce sui servizi pubblici (applichiamo il diritto all'oblio alla geografia? siamo in Cina?)
3. La strada esiste fisicamente, quindi ha diritto di stare su OSM. Se esistono dei vincoli vanno esplicitati i vincoli
4. La problematica è già stata riscontrata (e una soluzione di massima esiste) in California, qui per approfondire https://hi.stamen.com/patrolling-trails-in-openstreetmap-a1c4762efb70#.43d2tgqkz
Gh0stz0x (2017-01-08 21:47:31+00:00): 1 Ho capito bene cosa ha scritto (non sono del tutto stupido)
2 Chiede rispetto e non ne da, mettendosi alla pari con chi passa con le moto distruggendo il lavoro del vostro team.
3 Per proteggere dai vandali i Vostri sentieri vandalizza il db di open street map.
4 Può benissimo rivolgersi al comune e chiedere che venga emessa un ordinanza per vietare i mezzi a motore sui sentieri.
5 Non è cortese con me, perchè non mi ha ancora risposto (domandare è lecito, rispondere è cortesia)
6 Non vado contro nessuno, proteggo solo dai vandali il db di OSM
7 Procedo al revert.
8 Grazie per esseri iscritto su OSM, se vuole le rioffro il mio aiuto per inserire dati su OSM non per distruggere il lavoro di altri.
Thedillis (2017-01-09 10:56:25+00:00): Ciao a tutti.

Questo sarà l'ultimo messaggio che scriviamo su questo, come sta andando in cirlcles con voi.

Questi percorsi non sono percorsi pubblici, percorsi di trattori o strade. Non abbiamo trasformato i percorsi vecchio piede pubblico.
Si tratta di percorsi MTB private che sono state fatte a mano nella foresta con il permesso proprietari terrieri.
Abbiamo i costruttori sentiero consentire ad amici di mtb di utilizzare i nostri sentieri privati ​​- ma rispettiamo i nostri sentieri e desideri.

Non permettiamo alle persone di inviare i nostri sentieri MTB private su forum pubblici.
I costruttori pista lo richiedano.
I proprietari dei terreni richiedano.
La gente del posto lo richiedano.
I nostri amici mtb rispettano questo.

Perché sei l'unico a non rispettare questo?

Si prega di smettere causando problemi alla nostra comunity MTB.
Gh0stz0x (2017-01-10 21:15:51+00:00): Hoooooo finalmente ti sei deciso a rispondere alle mie domande! era ora!
>Perché sei l'unico a non rispettare questo?
perchè non hai risposto prima alle mie domande??
Se tu ti decidevi a rispondere prima, avrei potuto valutare meglio la situazione.
Mettiti nei miei panni: prima sapevo solo che un utente di nome Thedillis aveva cancellato un sentiero. Dopo le domande che ho fatto non risponde e chiede di rispettare la sua volontà e del suo team (che per quello che ne sapevo poteva essere pure un team di scacchi). Pertanto sembrava che tu volessi nascondere le vere intenzioni della cancellazione del sentiero. Visto che ci sono persone che modificano strade per trasformarle in sentieri (grazie a pokemon go), chi cancella perché vuole tener nascosto un luogo pubblico, c'è chi cancella e basta solo per far dispetti, secondo te cosa dovevo pensare? Ora che so che è un terreno privato ecc ecc. è un altra cosa. Un consiglio: vi conviene mettere un cartello con il divieto di accesso alle moto e specificate che non volete che venga pubblicato, tracciato ed inserito ne su internet ne da nessun altra parte il sentiero. Tenete conto che se non mettete nulla, non è garantito che il sentiero che avete cancellato non venga inserito da qualcun' altro, perché ora come ora solo in 4/5 persone di OpenStreetMap sanno della vostra volontà. Non è detto che un mappatore che va in vacanza a Careggine non trova il sentiero e lo mappi e questo non per fare un dispetto a voi ma perchè non sa della vostra richiesta. Quindi mettete cartelli e per quanto riguarda la pista MTB in bocca al lupo, mi auguro che nessuno distrugga il vostro lavoro.
Grazie!
p.s.: il revert non l' ho fatto. ;-)
literan (2017-01-04 12:11:45+00:00): вы некорректно расставляете теги юридических прав доступа: access=no, bicycle=yes, foot=yes Означает, что велосипедистам можно, пешком можно, и при этом нельзя вообще никому (ворота заварены). Навигаторы сойдут с ума
naoliv (2017-01-10 17:43:48+00:00): Esse caminho surgiu de onde?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463543377
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-01-11 01:12:27+00:00): SEnão me engano foi por aproximação do que vi em outros mapas.
nevw (2017-01-04 06:15:28+00:00): What is the reason for access=no on the Lightning Park Recreation Centre Exit and Reid Highway On Ramp
nevw (2017-01-09 01:03:23+00:00): sb9576 has confirmed the access=no for these ways via a comment on a note I put in the area as follows:
"These roads are blocked. I confirmed again on Thursday morning when I drove by. Barriers have been erected on the entry and exit (tagged as barriers in OSM), both of which read "NO ACCESS". Further, at entry, a trench has been dug separating the exit from Tonkin Highway making it impossible for cars and bicycles to navigate into the exit off Tonkin Highway. Lastly, a sign has been erected that states access is now via Della Road."
Thanks sb9576 for the confirmation and is appreciated.
pnorman (2017-01-06 07:54:56+00:00): Is there a license for the Comox maps? I had a look, but couldn't find anything obvious on their website or the maps themselves.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 08:58:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For comunity center please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre. Does the Garfiled school no longer exists? Then please change https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151647159!

If you need help: You are welcome!
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
kaxtillo (2017-04-18 03:10:59+00:00): Compañero se le olvido darle atributo a la traza. Por ello quedo invisible.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Supaplex (2017-01-06 17:03:40+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-01-12 17:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Hjart (2017-01-04 08:04:43+00:00): Jeg har fjernet denne ændring idet der i forvejen var markeret en Spar forretning her (se https://www.openstreetmap.org/). Bemærk at forretningen ikke vil være synlig i Maps.Me før Maps.Me's kort bliver opdateret næste gang.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 09:09:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Supaplex (2017-01-06 17:04:15+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 09:14:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node to right building!
TheSwavu (2017-01-31 22:11:24+00:00): Hi, 

Which one of the names on this:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314411706

is the common name and which one is from MRWA?

They should be split into name and alt_name with corresponding source tags.
WarrenP (2017-01-31 22:53:27+00:00): Accepted
Fairly easy to fix.  I now understand, at the time I did those I was unaware of alt_name
TheSwavu (2017-01-31 22:57:15+00:00): The other thing I noticed is that you should separate multiple values with a semi-colon.

So:

source=Main Roads Western Australia;Bing

not 

source=Main Roads Western Australia, Bing

otherwise the system thinks this is some special tag:


http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/source=Main%20Roads%20Western%20Australia%2C%20Bing
WarrenP (2017-01-31 23:33:46+00:00): Understood.  Syntax is all
In future I will do that but what do I do about the ones I have already done.  There is a number.
Also Main Roads Western Australia, Bing trace
Any script to help?
TheSwavu (2017-02-01 00:03:30+00:00): It's OK. I was going to fix them. I was letting you know so as to slow down the production of new ones...
WarrenP (2017-02-01 01:47:45+00:00): OK thanks
BTW the Charnley River Road is a bit complicated.
I tagged it as a service road even though it is on the Main Roads map.  I suspect that this road is on private land, well land managed by AWC.  I made a somewhat arbitrary decision to tag the road as service rather than residential.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 09:35:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2018-01-07 05:32:06+00:00): I have revert this changeset.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 09:36:22+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 09:36:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-16 15:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
mavl (2017-10-16 15:03:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
manoharuss (2017-01-05 06:12:58+00:00): Hi GoogleMapMaker,

Refer wiki for bus stop names http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses. Are these the actual names of the bus stops?

Best,

Manohar
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:01:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Jarek 🚲 (2018-07-16 19:36:34+00:00): Similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44757848 

List of problems with this changeset found by manual inspection of names

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32255085 "Lane South Ascot West Earlsciurt" spelling
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34116598 old_name "Lane West Avenue South Mcmaster" is assuredly not an official old name and in any case mis-capitalizes "McMaster"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69845176 "Lane West Spadina North Sussex Avenue" doesn't meet your usual scheme
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23434369 "Lane West Hurron North susex Avenue" - this is actually west of Huron with one R, north of Sussex with two S, inconsistent use of "Avenue"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23434356 "Lane East Spadina South Susex Avenue" Sussex misspelled, inconsistent use of "Avenue"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7991745 "Lane East Spadina Susex Avenue" again Sussex
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10070568 "Lane West Spadina South college" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83070954 "Lane North dundas East Augusta" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22795691 "Lane North dundas West Euclid" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5941217 "Lane North dundas East Markham" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10187165 "Lane North Qeen East Euclid Avenue" spelling
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10070533 "Lane North Dundas West Denison Avenue" inconsistent use of "Avenue"

Please fix.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:27:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-16 15:04:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
bielebog (2017-01-04 12:25:22+00:00): Diese Änderungen erscheinen etwas obskur. Welche Quellen hast Du denn verwendet?
geodreieck4711 (2017-01-09 07:43:33+00:00): Warum ein Multipolgon?
Und dann noch mit ID-Editor....
eggie (2017-07-19 07:00:43+00:00): PB gestuurd met alsnog welkom
mavl (2017-10-16 15:04:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
Hjart (2017-01-04 21:57:48+00:00): Der er stadig markeret en bank i bygningen. Den bør fjernes?
AsgerFrank (2017-01-05 11:24:28+00:00): Har ændret punktet til den hæveautomat, der har erstattet banken.
Hjart (2017-01-04 08:38:58+00:00): Jeg har fjernet din beskrivelse fordi du havde anbragt den på en 8 km lang sektion af kystlinien og den derfor ikke gav nogen mening. Du er velkommen til at anbringe bænken mere præcist.
mavl (2017-10-16 15:03:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
Hjart (2017-01-04 08:15:53+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag indtil videre.
Jeg har fjernet navn fra denne sti og delt den op så den østlige del nu er markeret som adgangsvej til Strandvejen 14B
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 09:53:31+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-15 17:42:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52959247 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44891768].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:27:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:35:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].