piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2022-12-06 15:18:20+00:00): Hi,

Something changed on the Padova residential area to cause it a highlight in QA in Dec-2022, where the east side park has somehow incurred a duplicate segment ring (residential inner role passes between hospital and park) and self intersection which you already corrected.

Before correcting the duplicate inner role issue, the fixme on this residential area relation is now 4 years old. Ready to put it in vertical archive or just move it to an informational note or description tag as it continues to flag on anyone's OSMI report that touches this zone.

For your understanding JIC you unlikely don't already know, other readers might not, non 'residential' areas inside a larger residential zone don't need any role assignment of inner/outer. Hospitals, schools (like Don Bosco), parks, farmland, apartment complexes, gated communities, sports areas all render 'over' residential zones exactly the same as buildings do.

Anyway, it seems there's inconsistency in mapping what's inner and what not, one park is the other is not, one school is, the other is not etc.

Let me know and I'll put the area on my plan of attack list, not compromising the main outline as it is now.

ciao
voschix (2022-12-06 16:24:13+00:00): Ciao, it's not a question of rendering, it's a question of data. A large hospital is not a residential land use. Farm land is definitely not residential land. The present rendering approach is a trick by the authors of the renderers to make the map rendering work. My main issue with that specific large landuse=residential polygon is that it is simply to big to handle. If you want to work on it, I would suggest to split it in smaller areas and using mainly major roads and waterways   as splits. 
I simply don't have the time to do this well. I may also have aggravated the problem by changing some land uses. In particular I recently added a missing bit of the Azienda Ospedaliera (western part) that was missing. 
Volker
ivanbranco (2022-12-06 18:59:57+00:00): Ho cominciato a sfoltire un po', siamo passati da 81 membri a 54.
voschix (2022-12-07 10:09:57+00:00): Come detto, penso che sia meglio di spezzare la relazione in poligoni più piccoli. Non so a che cosa serve una relazione che contiene un solo mega landuse=residential per la città.
RicoElectrico (2018-08-06 15:10:20+00:00): Check the name again ;-)
Tiwi (2018-08-07 12:39:42+00:00): thanks for the hint. Polish is quite difficult for me to type ;) I have corrected the spelling.
viloan (2018-08-05 21:45:48+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Frans S (2018-08-12 13:46:30+00:00): Hello, after reviewing this task I noticed that you hardly square buildings.  Use the S key after each mapped building. We have a lot of repair work on bad mapped buildings
Thank you
mzioma (2019-05-25 20:39:39+00:00): Dla terenów z tunelami foliowymi, np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614297138 prawidłowym tagiem jest landuse=greenhouse_horticulture a nie farmyard. Proszę popraw.
GerdP (2018-10-02 06:18:50+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90194680
The ref was CW 80, which looks reasonable.
You added name=BOULEVARD 01 NOVEMBRE and also changed the ref to this value. I've revierted the change to the ref and changed the name to mixed case "Boulevard 01 Novembre"
Владимир К (2018-08-06 14:24:30+00:00): 6 лет как отмечена, зачем вторую ставите?
trigpoint (2018-08-09 11:42:08+00:00): Hi, this edit covers quite a large area. What sources did you use to locate these objects?

Cheers Phil
Volker Fröhlich (2018-08-09 20:25:20+00:00): Hello Phil!

I'm taking random picks from a directory of skateparks and then I try to locate them on aerial photography to verify their existence.
Volker Fröhlich (2018-08-09 20:26:36+00:00): http://www.skateboard.com.au/skateparks/ to be precise
trigpoint (2018-08-09 20:35:11+00:00): That seems to be Australia.
Volker Fröhlich (2018-08-09 20:36:25+00:00): Oh, you can pick countries.

http://www.skateboard.com.au/v2/index.cfm?&action=search&new=1&gcountry=United%20Kingdom
trigpoint (2018-08-09 20:55:59+00:00): Seems to be using Google maps which we must not use.
Volker Fröhlich (2018-08-09 20:58:09+00:00): Well, I'm not tracing data from Google maps there. They just happen to show their coordinates on it.
Volker Fröhlich (2018-08-09 21:00:27+00:00): The eventual source for me is either Bing, Esri or Digitalglobe.
trigpoint (2018-08-09 21:07:23+00:00): My opinion is we must not even use Google maps to even do that.
Volker Fröhlich (2018-08-09 21:11:39+00:00): Frankly, I'm finding it hard to interpret the rules this way.

What if that website provided the coordinates as text or if they were using Bing as a backdrop to show the coordinates on? Would that make it more acceptable?
trigpoint (2018-08-09 21:19:46+00:00): Well you still need explicit permission to use that information, database rights will apply to any collection of facts.
Volker Fröhlich (2018-08-09 21:23:48+00:00): I basically agree on what you are saying, but I'm using this website in the same manual way as everybody else and I am not copying any of their data. They act merely as hints to me. However, if you think that I must ask for permission, I happily will.
Volker Fröhlich (2018-08-09 21:33:18+00:00): I previously scrolled up and down aerial photography in my country, hunting for skateparks, since I have a good idea where they are usually located within a community. The eventual source to validate their existence was a valid one. I'd struggle to explain to anybody why the results of such a brute-force approach would be any more valid.
trigpoint (2018-08-09 21:58:47+00:00): Everything you need to know about copyright is in https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ
Volker Fröhlich (2018-08-09 22:09:25+00:00): Are we still discussing whether it counts as "Google maps" or if I may use the coordinates skateboard.com.au is providing?
trigpoint (2018-08-09 22:34:45+00:00): You cannot get permission for google maps, but you do need permission from the website for their work to be reproduced without restriction.

Personally I find it simpler to map places I have actually been to.
trigpoint (2018-08-10 08:08:23+00:00): You should also be aware ofthe import guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
DaveF (2018-08-08 00:16:11+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8507208

Historic boundaries don't belong in OSM, which is a database for current objects. If you wish to collate old data please transfer it to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map before removing it. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61410203

Cheers
DaveF
TediouslyBored (2018-08-17 04:00:06+00:00): Hello,
Is Vassar's Backyard a formal name for the area you marked or a name it is commonly called? If it's neither of those, I personally think it should not be included.
kartonage (2018-08-06 02:31:25+00:00): Hallo,

benutzt du das tag "childcare" bewusst oder schlägt iD das automatisch vor? Wenn du bewusst auf childcare änderst würde mich nämlich interessieren, warum du das machst. "kindergarten" als tag für Kindergärten ist weitaus etablierter.

Schöne Grüße
gemsquash (2018-08-06 19:18:52+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe amenity:childcare gewählt, weil es sich bei den vier (im Ebersstraße-Kiez) betroffenen Kitas um kleine Elterninitiativkitas handelt, die nicht über ein klassisches Kindergartengelände (amenity:kindergarten) verfügen. Somit schien mir "Kindertagesstätte/Kinderbetreuung" weitaus zutreffender. (ErzieherInnen und Kinder nutzen die Spielplätze im Umfeld der Kitas als "Außengelände".)

Hauptsächlich ging es darum, bei den Kitas die aktuellen Namen und aktuellen Trägervereine einzutragen.

Weil Du "kindergarten" als etablierter empfiehlst, habe ich soeben alle vier EInrichtungen umgeswitcht.

Gruß aus Schöneberg
Geste27 (2018-08-10 02:29:32+00:00): Ja das kommt vom iD-Editor.
Die Presets, bzw. die Übersetzungen lauten bei iD so:
.
a) an einem Punkt-Element
.
Kindergartengelände wird zu amenity=kindergarten
.
Kindertagesstätte/Kinderbetreuung wird zu amenity=childcare
.
b) an einem Flächen-Element
.
Kindergartengelände wird zu amenity=kindergarten
.
Kindertagesstätte/Kinderbetreuung wird zu 
amenity=childcare
building=yes
.
Finde ich auch nicht so optimal, aber wie könnte man das ändern?
Dachte die childcare proposals wurden nicht angenommen und sind auch rot markiert, siehe:
.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Nursery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare2.0
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/childcare
Warin61 (2018-09-23 02:40:35+00:00): Hi,
Excellent change set description! Unfortunately the section you added is over the top of a remained of the way tagged as Jimma Crescent. What is best to do in this situation would have been to break the old way of Jimma into 2, and rename the relevant section to Cooroy. 
I have fixed it by breaking the old way of Jimma into 2, and deleting the relevant section, this keeps the history fairly intact.
ShaunKolo (2018-09-23 03:36:49+00:00): Thanks Warin61, much appreciated. That does make sense. It wasn’t obvious to me how to select and split a line when I was trying to edit/add the feature. I requested the review just in case I had it all wrong. All the best
Warin61 (2018-09-23 03:56:43+00:00): Sorry .. not an Id user so I cannot help there. (I use JOSM) Should be somewhere in an Id help thingy somewhere.
viloan (2018-08-06 01:41:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
woodpeck_repair (2018-12-15 12:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65498514 where the changeset comment is: delete test edits near south pole
AkuAnakTimur (2018-08-06 04:16:31+00:00): Percubaan berjaya?

Apa yang "Test Kota Bharu" ni? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614353256
viloan (2018-08-06 03:23:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Ezagren (2018-08-14 16:20:11+00:00): Lebih baik tanya pembuatnya dahulu, orangnya (kontributor) masih aktif lho, terjun langsung pula ke lapangan, apakah unclassified atau sudah di-classified. Tatkala saat itu belum ada citra satelit di daerah ini.
dennisramadhan (2018-08-15 03:00:17+00:00): sebelumnya mas Ezagren, dalam proyek yang kami kerjakan sekarang ini klasifikasi jalan terbagi atas Trunk - Primer - Secondary - Tertiary - Unclassified - Residential - Track - Footway (hirarki jalan dari yang paling tinggi ke yg rendah) .

Unclassified dalam proyek ini termasuk dalam hirarki jalan. dimana jalan dengan tag highway:unclassified adalah jalan yang menghubungkan antar pemukiman, bukan berarti jalan tersebut belum "terklasifikasi". mungkin banyak sekali ditemui jalan dengan tag highway:unclassified pada jalan yang seharusnya memiliki tag lain di kalimantan, tetapi kami bermaksud juga untuk memperbaiki tagnya sesuai dengan hirarki.

bisa kita diskusikan lagi mas mungkin tentang tag jalan di kalimantan hehe
Ezagren (2018-08-18 06:45:24+00:00): di mana saya bisa lihat halaman ikhtisar pengenalan/penjelasan proyeknya?

warna unclassified dan residential terlampau mirip, jadi bisa membingungkan pengguna OSMTracker.
dennisramadhan (2018-08-20 03:26:17+00:00): mas ezagren mungkin perlu diskusi lebih lanjut, kalau bisa boleh saya minta email mas untuk diskusi lebih lanjut mengenai klasifikasi jalan? terima kasih
Ezagren (2018-08-20 07:38:15+00:00): Surel saya sama dengan nama pengguna saya, tinggal ditambahkan @gmail.com saja. Salam.
Rich1234 (2018-08-06 07:33:52+00:00): This edit looks to need to be reverted.  It has added a new way which does not map to the I-66 right of way in any way (and which is a zig-zag edit around the west falls church metro station.

I-66 already has a pair of ways that track the proper right of way, it does not need an incorrect third way that does not do so in the map.
Jothirnadh (2018-08-13 10:26:33+00:00): This looks like a wrong edit reverted the changes. Since there were couple of other edits that had happened above this changeset the reverter option in JOSM didn't work. Deleted all the edits of this changeset manually:

changesets: 61620609, 61621069, 61621081, 61621096, 61621113, 61621125, 61621155, 61621181

Let me know if you need more information.
b108 (2018-08-06 14:05:04+00:00): Добрый день!

По поводу данной правки: хочется понять появилась ли какая-то алетернатива проезда из района ЖК Новый Свет на Университетский проспект? Кроме как через светофор на пересечении Казахской и Университетской.
taxi34 (2018-08-06 14:25:24+00:00): ул качуевской
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-05 21:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63243480 where the changeset comment is: remove fictional edits by user Chris-Lee after no reply received to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2264
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-23 21:57:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5363985265/history has RT=6 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
ikopanjirukmana (2024-02-27 01:12:27+00:00): Hello, Mateusz Konieczny. 

I believe Ato83 is no longer active, but I have some suggestions based on your questions. key "Kabupaten" means regency, "Kecamatan" means district, and RT stands for "Rukun Tetangga" or Neighborhood Unit. Meanwhile, RW stands for "Rukun Warga" meaning Community Unit. As the name implies, these two represent the neighborhood and the community in one location.


My assumption is that ato83 would like to offer complete address information at this node.
သိန္း စိုး (2018-08-12 12:29:41+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/2/edit?mid=1yhH8i8NKgZj9Bpw8o4OmKbqvvDV9ksSm&ll=21.974181139207325%2C96.09854135&z=13
သိန္း စိုး (2018-08-12 12:30:29+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/2/edit?mid=1yhH8i8NKgZj9Bpw8o4OmKbqvvDV9ksSm&ll=21.974181139207325%2C96.09854135&z=13
AgusQui (2018-08-06 13:28:57+00:00): Hola Nahuel, fijate que rompiste las relaciones de límites de Merlo e Ituzaingó, mas tarde lo arreglo, por favor ten más cuidado. Respecto al cambio de nombre de Rivadavia a Perón en ruta 7 ¿en que te basas? Estoy casi seguro que los carteles indican que se llama Rivadavia, por otro lado te aviso que no se deben abreviar los nombres. Cualquier duda avisame.
AgusQui (2018-08-06 13:33:40+00:00): Veo que también has borrado interpolaciones de numeración ¿porqué motivo? ¿Sabias que se usan para buscar direcciones?
Nahuel01 (2018-08-06 14:33:40+00:00): Hola, no sabia lo de las relaciones ni lo de las calles.
1: lo de las relaciones pensé que era un muro que habían puesto erróneamente dentro del country.
2: lo de la numeración pensé que eran puntos y lineas aleatorias, ya que probé poner veredas pero no era el caso.
Con referencia a los nombres, me estoy basando en Google Maps, Mapas de Tom-Tom y Mapas de Garmin/Proyecto Mapear. Igual en todos lados hoy en día se le dice Av. Rivadavia pero se podría poner de las 2 maneras para mejor comprensión, no lo había pensado. No sabia que no se abreviaban los nombres, gracias.
AgusQui (2018-08-06 15:24:51+00:00): No copies de otros mapas, el principio de OSM es relevar de primera mano, esos mapas que mencionas tienen licencias restrictivas que no permiten usar sus datos, además si tienen errores los trasladas a OSM. Cambia los nombres de las calles sólo si estás seguro que es así, no porque lo dice otro mapa. 
Te dejo nuestra wiki donde encontrarás convenciones de mapeo y el contacto del resto de la comunidad: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina te recomiendo que ingreses al chat de Telegram donde podés sacarte dudas al instante.
AgusQui (2018-08-07 14:11:27+00:00): Ya corregí los errores que encontré, me costó bastante porque no quiese revertir tus cambios porque aportaste bastantes cosas. Ruta 7 entre Rio Reconquista y Solanet confirmo que los carteles indican Avenida Rivadavia. Las calles que cortaste por la construcción del Buen Ayre las puse como construction. 
Cualquier duda avisá.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-08-13 09:46:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61620045 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some doodles in China and elsewhere
WalkerB (2018-08-13 20:48:54+00:00): This was pretty well done.  Please make sure not to connect the roads to the power lines.  I disconnected them so no problem, just for future reference.  Likewise, make sure that the roads connect to each other.  There were two NRAP roads that were crossing but were not connected.
abakus_uploader (2018-08-06 22:30:53+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
သိန္း စိုး (2018-08-12 15:32:15+00:00): This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
<osm version="0.6" generator="CGImap 0.6.1 (2048 thorn-02.openstreetmap.org)" copyright="OpenStreetMap and contributors" attribution="http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright" license="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/">
<way id="614376666" visible="true" version="1" changeset="61391465" timestamp="2018-08-06T06:20:41Z" user="သိန္း စိုး" uid="8647411">
<nd ref="5811673394"/>
<nd ref="5811673395"/>
<tag k="bicycle" v="yes"/>
<tag k="bridge" v="yes"/>
<tag k="foot" v="yes"/>
<tag k="highway" v="motorway_link"/>
<tag k="horse" v="yes"/>
<tag k="layer" v="-1"/>
<tag k="maxheight" v="5"/>
<tag k="maxspeed" v="40"/>
<tag k="maxspeed:advisory" v="80"/>
<tag k="name" v="27th Streets(ေရႊေမတၱာလမ္း)"/>
<tag k="oneway" v="no"/>
<tag k="ref" v="27th Streets(ေရႊေမတၱာလမ္း)"/>
<tag k="surface" v="ground"/>
</way>
</osm>
သိန္း စိုး (2018-08-12 15:33:06+00:00): This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
<osmChange version="0.6" generator="CGImap 0.6.1 (4055 thorn-03.openstreetmap.org)" copyright="OpenStreetMap and contributors" attribution="http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright" license="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1-0/">
<create>
<node id="5811673394" visible="true" version="1" changeset="61391465" timestamp="2018-08-06T06:20:41Z" user="သိန္း စိုး" uid="8647411" lat="21.9789622" lon="96.1180183"/>
</create>
<create>
<node id="5811673395" visible="true" version="1" changeset="61391465" timestamp="2018-08-06T06:20:41Z" user="သိန္း စိုး" uid="8647411" lat="21.9790135" lon="96.1173892"/>
</create>
<create>
<way id="614376666" visible="true" version="1" changeset="61391465" timestamp="2018-08-06T06:20:41Z" user="သိန္း စိုး" uid="8647411">
<nd ref="5811673394"/>
<nd ref="5811673395"/>
<tag k="bicycle" v="yes"/>
<tag k="bridge" v="yes"/>
<tag k="foot" v="yes"/>
<tag k="highway" v="motorway_link"/>
<tag k="horse" v="yes"/>
<tag k="layer" v="-1"/>
<tag k="maxheight" v="5"/>
<tag k="maxspeed" v="40"/>
<tag k="maxspeed:advisory" v="80"/>
<tag k="name" v="27th Streets(ေရႊေမတၱာလမ္း)"/>
<tag k="oneway" v="no"/>
<tag k="ref" v="27th Streets(ေရႊေမတၱာလမ္း)"/>
<tag k="surface" v="ground"/>
</way>
</create>
<create>
<relation id="8507501" visible="true" version="1" changeset="61391465" timestamp="2018-08-06T06:20:42Z" user="သိန္း စိုး" uid="8647411">
<member type="way" ref="614376666" role="street"/>
<tag k="name" v="27th Streets(ေရႊေမတၱာလမ္း)"/>
<tag k="ref" v="27th Streets, Mandalay"/>
<tag k="route" v="road"/>
<tag k="type" v="route"/>
</relation>
</create>
</osmChange>
Gppes (2018-08-06 06:40:13+00:00): Hallo, in Deinen Edits entfernst Du konsequent landuse=residential und/oder erstetzt diese durch landuse=grass.

Aus meiner Sicht ist das falsch und sollte diskutiert werden. Koenntest Du Dich hierzu bitte einer Diskussion in einem AT-Forum (Mailingliste/Webforum) stellen?

Lg, Gppes
JM82 (2018-08-06 06:44:21+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe diese Gemeinde mittlerweile umgezeichnet und div. landuse-Tags ergänzt (grass, farmland, scrub etc.). Kurzum: die Landschaft abgebildet, die sich rund um diese Gemeinde befindet. Bisher ist die Karte ja dort weiß.
IN welchen Edits habe ich "konsequent" den residential-Tag entfernt bzw. durch grass ersetzt?
Gppes (2018-08-06 06:55:50+00:00): Hi,

in diesem Changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61380008#map=16/47.0473/15.8898

ist zum Beispiel dieser residential verloren gegangen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333157461/history

Ich halte aber auch die Nutzung von landuse=grass fuer falsch, egal ob die Karte voher leer war oder nicht...

Lg, Gppes