piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-11-03 21:22:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Frans S (2019-11-06 14:53:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A request. Please map more accurate. You map buildings a bit oversized
Please use the Maxar Std Imagery as the primary source. More recent and actual than the BING imagery. And prescribed in the instructions

Best regards
iWowik (2019-11-23 21:20:54+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте!
Вы ставите номера домов, а их обычно не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?
user_5359 (2019-11-04 17:02:00+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte dass bei OSM die Beschreibung von Objekten die höchste Priorität hat. Objekte, die nur aus einem Namen bestehen, haben wenig Sinn. Als deutsche Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie beschreibe ich was?“ empfehle ich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a (Vorsicht: Viele Information damit lange Ladezeiten)
dval (2019-11-04 04:44:48+00:00): Hi, mini-me! Спасибо за дополнения. Но по кр.м. в одном месте правка не верна. Это пеш. перех. по Ленина между авт. ост. УПИ и салоном МТС. Вы перенесли ее на старое место (восточнее), в то время, как моя версия соответствовала тому, что есть сейчас в реальности. На Мапиллари должно это быть.
dval (2019-11-04 04:45:31+00:00): "Её" - это пешеходный переход.
mini-me (2019-11-04 07:35:32+00:00): Привет! Передвинул его/её обратно. Спасибо.
dval (2019-11-04 15:27:51+00:00): Я вот еще думаю, что может надо и на отрезки хайвей=футвей на пеш. переходах вешать footway=crossing? Но руки никак не дойдут. Или это излишне будет?
dval (2019-11-04 15:45:20+00:00): Памятник Попову вы сдвинули на восток (4 м), мне кажется, зря. Проверьте, пож., смещение космоснимков. Если иные точки устраивают, то эта тоже должна. И еще: ул. Ленина от ул. К.Маркса до ул. Лен.Комсом. классифицирована как секондари еще с 2010 года. Думаю, ее следует понизить до тешери, поскольку, хоть это и центральная улица города, но трафика такого по ней нет - чисто местные автобусы и легковые авто.
dval (2019-11-04 16:21:51+00:00): Еще: вы используете Bing. Maxar по-свежее будет, имхо. В настройках должен быть. Также, думаю, стоит рассмортеть вариант использования JOSM вместо iD (хотя, говорят, он совершенствуется). В джосме очень много полезных инструментов для качественного рисования.
mini-me (2019-11-04 18:38:24+00:00): Maxar частично в облаках, поэтому пришлось переключаться между подложками. Где-то в этот момент памятник и уплыл. Да и сам Maxar... иногда привяжешь по трекам, а через пару кварталов уже опять не совпадает.
JOSM использую когда надо что-то сложное сделать, а так iD, имхо, поудобнее будет. Не хватает разве что инструментов для рисования домиков и редактора маршрутов.
Насчёт ул. Ленина не знаю. Количество полос как у Чкалова/Ленинскокого Комсомола. Треков даже больше. Я бы оставил.
footway=crossing мне кажется есть смысл рисовать при наличии снимков с коптера или когда всё остальное уже замаплено :) А так, тратить время на гадание по мутным космоснимкам...
Уж лучше заняться роутингом.
Дорисовать тротуары https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6203206928
Повесить foot=no там, где они уже отрисованы и на вот такие соединения https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2121945935
итд
kapazao (2019-11-04 13:40:06+00:00): Hola, no le encuentro mucho sentido a eso de que haya un castillo (Palacios Nazaríes) dentro de otro (Alhambra), quizás haya que buscar mejor etiquetado para ambos, pero me parece que los Palacios Nazaríes no deberían ser castillo, sino edificio de palacio.
Otro detalle, la etiqueta addr:city no es necesaria, ya que existiendo este elemento dentro de los límites de la ciudad es redundante. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76563202
james1b (2019-11-03 22:10:54+00:00): This looks good to me - thank you for your time and patience!
skquinn (2019-11-04 18:18:29+00:00): Re: way 741761248 and way 741761245 -- where are you seeing these sidewalks/footpaths next to Wakeforest Street? And on which imagery?

Also, please try to use changeset comments more descriptive than "edits". Honestly, "edits" with no further information is as useful as a blank comment.
user_5359 (2019-11-04 17:04:52+00:00): Hallo, zur besseren Beschreibung Deiner Ladestation wirf doch bitte mal ein Blick auf die Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
SimonPoole (2019-11-03 22:24:26+00:00): Note no imagery was actually used in this edit.
itineris (2019-11-05 12:02:33+00:00): Szia!

Kérlek, rakd vissza a military=bunker címkét mindenhová, ahonnan leszedted! Az OSM Wiki is elég egyértelmű a kérdésben. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Dbunker

Azt, hogy már nincsen használatban, a historic=yes, illetve ha romos, akkor a ruins=yes címkékkel tudod jelezni.

Ugyanitt a bunker típusának címkézéséről is olvashatsz.

Köszönöm:
Ákos
Bence Mélykúti (2019-11-05 13:47:16+00:00): Szia!

Egyelőre nem tudom, mit gondoljak a javaslatodról, mert az érvelésed nem győzött meg. A military=bunker OSM Wiki oldalra hivatkozni kissé cirkuláris érvelés ebben az esetben: az annyit mond, hogy a bunkereket címkézzük bunkernek. De mi egy bunker?

Ezen az oldalon egyértelmű, hogy az objektumnak katonainak kell lennie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:military
„Tags with the military key are used for buildings and land used by the Army, Navy, Airforce and any other kind of military or paramilitary in the host country.”
Az általad hivatkozott oldal is kizárólag jelenidőt használ:
„any kind of military installation built to withstand an attack.”
Budapesten nem „katonai létesítményekről” van szó, hanem volt katonaiakról, amelyeknek a Honvédséghez már nincs közük. Ha valaki katonai létesítményeket keres, annak direkt félrevezető a javaslatod alapján való címkézés.

Én a building=bunker, bunker_type=..., historic=bunker címkéket írnám magamtól. A historic=bunker nem optimális/nem szükséges, a historic=yes sem lenne rossz helyette. A kérésed ráébreszt, hogy a disused:military=bunker vagy az abandoned:military=bunker címkét is támogassam, hozzáfűzzem. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) Ehhez mit szólnál?

Bence

U.i. Aki tud németül, itt egy vita: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19516
itineris (2019-11-05 13:56:23+00:00): Ezek szerint te a hármashatárhegyi légvédelmi ütegről is leszednéd a címkét? Pedig eléggé bunker még ma is, ha nem is használják. Szerintem ez elég jól van címkézve most - még ha kicsit túlzásba is vitték az abandoned, disused, historic cifrázást.

Ugyanakkor a pomázi Kő-hegyen már csak az ütegek gödrei vannak meg, ott nincs is rajta a sima címke, csak az abandoned. És ez így van jól.

Ákos
Bence Mélykúti (2019-11-05 20:12:33+00:00): Feltettem a kérdést a kollégáink körében:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openstreetmap-hungary/l03z_2Vd4Xo
Szólj hozzá nyugodtan, ill. várjuk meg, mit mondanak.
Bence Mélykúti (2019-11-10 10:31:53+00:00): Visszacsináltam a bunkerek címkéinek eltávolítását, ill. bővítettem a bunkerek címkézését a fenti fórum hozzászólásai alapján:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76864216
aixbrick (2019-11-04 09:42:04+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM,
there is no park here at all. Therefore I have reverted this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76579589.
Maybe you are a Pokemon Go Player? If so please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers.
Regards
viloan (2019-11-03 22:48:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
literan (2019-11-04 17:47:37+00:00): да, еще эти лестницы и дорожки расположены в тоннелях, поэтому на них обычно ставят тег tunnel=yes ))
literan (2019-11-04 17:47:58+00:00): так они, кстати, на рендерах не будут перемешиваться с наземными
cyberden (2019-11-04 18:14:05+00:00): да, с tunnel понятно, но как раз там я внимательно посмотрел как оно сделано, где есть - например на Дмитрия Донского или Комсомольской и Боровицкой - там туннель проставлен тем дорожкам, которые физически идут в сети метро в небольшом туннеле, например под другой лестницей.

Но в этих правках я таких линий не добавлял - эта тема еще ждет своего исследователя. Так же как лестниц не было добавлено - только соединение существующих.

Но да, впредь буду на это тоже смотреть внимательно.
literan (2019-11-05 10:57:02+00:00): Это, вообще, здорово, что вы системно занялись метросетью. Может, получится в мобильных приложениях роутинг нормально наладить по пересадкам. Кстати, у мапс.ми есть валидатор метро, вы в курсе?
cyberden (2019-11-05 11:45:40+00:00): Собственно, для маршрутизации и занялся этим - чтоб пешком и на транспорте было возможно строить связный дорожный граф, стараюсь.

Про валидатор не знал, только JOSM'овский встроенный использовал до сих пор.
literan (2019-11-05 12:28:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Zverik/diary/43020
отсюда копать надо
gileri (2019-11-04 20:51:38+00:00): Hello,

bridge=yes is not necessary on man_made=bridge, only on highways accross the bridge :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man made=bridge
nuxper_np (2019-11-06 22:40:51+00:00): thanks for the message. I removed it.
user_5359 (2019-11-04 05:44:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Based on what information did you draw such a large building? At various aerial photos you can still see a forest here.
user_5359 (2019-11-04 16:10:43+00:00): Hello! For a better description of your object Jax Family Park Fun Park have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dtheme_park .
Gazer75 (2019-11-06 23:38:57+00:00): You need to be careful with editing landcover using iD editor. It is not very good at dealing with multipolygon relations. This is more advanced and should be done with JOSM.
maraf24 (2019-11-04 18:31:16+00:00): Zmiany wycofałem, droga nie jest w budowie.
jbsmg1 (2019-11-03 23:26:26+00:00): Obstruído devido a Construção da Trincheira Trevo Taiaman, no Bairro Taiaman.
naoliv (2019-11-04 02:26:10+00:00): jbsmg1, essa obstrução é temporário? Depois esses trechos vão voltar ao seu estado anterior?
Caso sim, não precisa apagar, mas apenas definir como em construção ou algo similar.
naoliv (2019-11-04 02:27:13+00:00): Aliás, quando for assim também, ainda é bom manter os caminhos no OSM, com uma nota explicando a situação atual. Isso vai evitar que outras pessoas tracem novamente esse caminho para frente, usando imagens de satélite antigas.
jbsmg1 (2019-11-04 08:59:11+00:00): Bom Dia naoliv! É subtração não é temporária e sim definitiva. Os trechos não vão voltar ao seu estado anterior. A construção em andamento modificará o traçado das vias, deixando desistir as paisagens ora eliminadas. Abraço
viloan (2019-11-03 23:34:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse (2019-12-06 10:17:33+00:00): Is the Maplins at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338505254 really still open?  I'd be surprised...
doublah (2019-12-08 00:56:57+00:00): you're probably correct, AFAIK all Maplin stores are closed now, i'll make an issue at name-suggestion-index
Glassman (2019-11-04 01:17:11+00:00): From the imagery it appears that North 8th Street continues yet you deleted it. Can you explain why?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76565071
evo_evz (2020-11-25 04:11:12+00:00): Hey. Park is still signposted as Sesquicentenary Park. Where did you get this new name of Trent from? Thanks?
whb (2020-03-21 11:29:26+00:00): Sollte der Geldautomat wieder in das Gebäude verlegt worden sein, bitte das outdoor=yes wieder entfernen.
Zuvor befand er sich längere Zeit außen, siehe:
https://www.mapillary.com/app?focus=photo&pKey=z9IcXT3lg2FTLdPhe-OXFQ
whb (2020-04-23 08:39:43+00:00): Guten Tag,
meine Überprüfung vor Ort hat ergeben, dass sich der Geldautomat unverändert außerhalb des Gebäudes befindet, deshalb habe ich dessen Positionsänderung wieder rückgängig gemacht.
claytonvo (2020-01-24 16:25:31+00:00): Hello SSR_317, 
My name is Clayton and I work on the OSM editing team for Lyft. While working in this area, I came across this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/590629983 that was tagged with junction:ref:2. According to the OSM wiki for the junction:ref tag: (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:junction:ref), the junction:ref tag should only be used to indicate exit numbers according to signage along a road. Since this way is an onramp, it is unlikely to have an exit number associated with it. Furthermore, I was unable to locate any signage corresponding to an exit number for this way using street imagery. If you would be so kind as to provide a source for your change or revert your previous changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76565263 to reflect this change it would be greatly appreciated. 

Thank You!
Clayton
mapman44 (2019-12-07 17:19:46+00:00): There are numerous orphan nodes with no data in this edit area. Are they needed for some reason or can they be deleted? Thanks.
SomeoneElse (2019-11-20 23:28:06+00:00): Hello,
In this changset you've suggested that the residential landuse around Ripley has a gable roof over it (see http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=572852865 ).  This seems unlikely.  Also, what does the changeset comment here mean?
Best Regards,
Andy
aachso (2019-11-05 20:41:31+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Die Haumühle und die umliegenden Gebäude Nr 2 - Nr 9 gehören alle zum selben Grundstück. Der Weg dazwischen ist demnach keine öffentliche Straße, sondern eine Privatstraße, auch wenn die daran anliegenden Gebäude die Adresse "Haumühle" haben.

highway=driveway wäre hier vermutlich der beste Tag dafür und die Straße sollte keinen Namen haben.

Der Zweig zur linken Seite führt außerdem durch ein Gebäude. Wenn man hier durch das Gebäude fahren kann, markiere das an der Stelle bitte mit tunnel=building_passage.

Danke
wireguy (2019-11-04 02:00:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Looks good.
user_5359 (2019-11-04 05:33:35+00:00): Short inquiry to the key service_times: the services are held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case add a Su (followed by space character) at the beginning of the value. Please notice also: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
trigpoint (2019-11-04 19:27:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we map what exists on the ground. Changing a house that another mapper had mapped correctly, to some thing it is not is considered vandalism.

I am reverting both of your changesets.
trigpoint (2019-11-04 19:29:40+00:00): There is no Burger King in the middle of a housing estate, adding misleading objects can damage the reputation of OSM.

Please only add what exists in real life.
viloan (2019-11-04 02:45:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_115918 (2019-11-04 03:27:06+00:00): I've fixed this one in the name index to not match here in the future. Sorry about this.
stevea (2019-11-05 00:15:13+00:00): I have been frustrated by over ten years of imagery alignment difficulties in OSM around UCSC.  Realizing how careful and tedious this work must have been for you to complete, I wanted to thank you for your care to finish it.  Zooming in recently around both Red Square and Theater Arts, I've never seen the alignment look so spot-on.  Thank you!
joeybab3 (2019-11-05 00:20:16+00:00): @stevea I consulted the OSM reddit to figure out what the best approach would be for this and after running some gps traces I came to the conclusion that the alignment best fitting this area was the same one used for a lot of downtown Santa Cruz. I will continue to align the rest of the areas to the best of my ability but let me know if I mistakenly break any relations or am doing something wrong in the process.
stevea (2019-11-05 00:24:36+00:00): (No @ before my name, that's OK).  Wow, thanks for the quick reply!

Yes, as I said, it looks much better around central campus and has been improving recently — now I know you've been one of the busy ones fixing "bad offsets" and a whole bunch of confusing skew on a lot of campus buildings and roads.  Good to hear the alignment issues will be "knit together" with downtown and wider areas, that seems quite correct.

I'll keep an eye on relations and other issues:  many hands make light work.  The map "fabric" crowdsourced by many more than one set of eyes makes it all work and work well!

In short:  looking great!
joeybab3 (2019-11-05 01:00:54+00:00): Thanks, it means a lot!
I decided on that solution as it would allow larger areas to mesh together better rather than just temporarily ligning everything in UCSC to a possibly wrong alignment. 

I will continue adding better definition to ways and polygons as I visit those areas of campus in my day to day activities.
QuartermaineProud (2019-11-05 23:04:38+00:00): This is the beginning of what I call: the Meadowcreek Project, or Project Meadowcreek.
abakus_uploader (2019-11-04 23:42:48+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ralley (2019-11-04 08:02:45+00:00): Please don't use yello pages as a source for OSM edits - it is copyright with an incompatible licence
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76568177
mavl (2019-11-07 16:42:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-11-04 07:53:05+00:00): Kijk in de wiki bij parking:lane  amenity=parking is eigenlijk niet correct. 
Het zijn geen parkings.
Gr eggie
emvee (2020-01-03 13:20:15+00:00): Goed dat dit bijgewerkt is.

Zijn met deze wijziging ook de verkeerslichten verdwenen? 

Zie ook http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#country=netherlands_limburg&item=2090&level=2&zoom=17&lat=50.861403&lon=6.015803

Groeten,

Martin.
MadelNL (2020-01-04 09:11:20+00:00): Had ik die niet allemaal weggehaald dan? Zit nu ergens in Italie een changeset te maken. Zal er later nog even naar kijken, of jij moet je geroepen voelen... ;)

Gr. Marco
emvee (2020-01-04 10:54:46+00:00): Hoi Marco,

Ja, de verkeerslichten zijn weggehaald maar op de kruisingen stond nog "crossing=traffic_signals", vandaar de Osmose warning, die zag geen verkeerslichten in de buurt.

Net de kruispunten bijgewerkt, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79185461

Probleem opgelost.
Константин Гам (2019-12-11 16:50:22+00:00): Открывая дороги, надо навигацию проверять что ли. Бетонный блок то забыли.
Да и статус завысили без причины
ralley (2019-11-04 08:01:15+00:00): Review as requested: Looks good to me, thanks for your additions.  One minor point: most buildings in NZ tend to consist of mainly 90 degrees corners.  In the Id editor if you press 'Q' it will square the object so all corners are 90 degrees.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76569390
UAN51 (2019-11-13 22:01:05+00:00): Volunteer responding - GNIS tags MUST be preserved!