piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2022-09-25 10:36:14+00:00): Hallo donovaly,
du hast an diesen beiden Straßenabschnitten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1067179232/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151279922/history
jeweils das Merkmal
- oneway=yes
ergänzt, allerdings in entgegengesetzter Richtung.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße

PS:
Gefunden mit Tool QS-Fernwegenetz / brouter-suspects: 
- https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59957 
- http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=19/7.85511/48.01401&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json
donovaly (2022-09-25 18:08:51+00:00): Entschuldigung, was soll dieses Misstrauen? Mappe bitte selbst anstatt bei anderen nach Fehlern zu suchen. Wenn du Fehler findest, dann behebe sie einfach.
Hier gibt es z.B. viele Straßen, die noch komplett fehlen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/245557356
So hilft du OSM mehr.

Ansonsten, war vor Ort und die Einbahnstraßenregelung ist eben gerade so, wie ich sie gemappt habe.
PT-53 (2022-09-26 07:21:02+00:00): Hallo donovaly, 
das hat doch nichts mit Misstrauen zu tun, wenn ich Dich auf einen offensichtlichen Fehler hinweise. 

Bei diesem Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1067179232/history
geht die Einbahnstraßenrichtung von Nordwest nach Südost und bei diesem Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151279922/history
von Südost nach Nordwest.
Das soll kein Fehler sein?

Den Fehler selbst beheben, kann ich nicht da ich keine Ortskenntnisse habe und nicht weiß, welche der beiden Straßenabschnitte die richtige Einbahnstraßen-Richtung anzeigt.

Grüße
donovaly (2022-09-26 16:29:33+00:00): > Das soll kein Fehler sein?

Doch ist einer. Wie gesagt, fixe es doch bitte einfach direkt. Wir haben jetzt 5 Nachrichten geschrieben, dabei ist der Fix einfach ein Klick.
Wie ich sehe, haben auch andere Nutzer an den Straßen der Kreuzung etwas geändert. Es ist eben gerade Baustelle und jede Woche stehen die Ampeln woanders, gilt eine andere Geschwindigkeit und auch die Einbahnstraßenregelung wurde schon mehrfach geändert.
PT-53 (2022-09-26 16:35:16+00:00): Schön das Du das jetzt auch als Fehler einstufst. Deine erneute Auffoderung, daß ich das "selbst fixen" soll muß ich erneut zurückweisen. Wie ich schon geschrieben habe, habe ich keine Ortskenntnisse.
Du hast die Einbahnstraßen eingetragen, dann liegt es doch auch an Dir, diese zu berichtigen.
5m4u9 (2022-09-13 01:34:09+00:00): Hi, what is the reason for removing the junction=circular tag?
5m4u9 (2022-09-13 01:38:14+00:00): maybe change to junction=intersection?
Mendicant_Slug_097 (2022-09-14 16:19:16+00:00): Hello 51114u9, thank you for reaching out. The decision to remove the junction was based on the observation the traffic island located in the middle of the junction is not forcing traffic to overtly navigate around it in a circular fashion, and that based on cars in imagery, people seem to be able to drive through this intersection like any other divided highway. I did not consider adding junction=intersection because it is at this stage only a proposed tag and has not undergone the full approval process. Let me know if you would prefer to tag it a different way. Thank you for reaching out to discuss the changeset.
bkil (2022-09-20 17:52:22+00:00): Could you please tell us why you deleted this place? Its homepage and facebook page is still alive. Did you survey it in person? We also welcome you on our next online event to discuss https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/20220923
maraf24 (2022-09-13 16:02:21+00:00): Cześć.
Ten komentarz jak i w poprzednich zestawach, jest niezrozumiały.
Co to jest 1070_1 ???
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Cristoffs (2022-09-13 17:31:17+00:00): Numer błędu osmose i Klasy, poprawiam pojedyncze budynki, sprawdź sobie na stronie będziesz wiedział dokładnie
maraf24 (2022-09-13 20:30:52+00:00): Chcę wiedzieć dokładnie tutaj, więc proszę, uzupełnij ten opis tu, w komentarzu do zestawu.
Nie podawaj także jako głównego komentarza wewnętrznych identyfikatorów narzędzi tworzonych przez trzecie strony. Mogą stanowić dodatek, ale nie treść główną.
Ponownie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Leslieramos13 (2022-09-12 21:23:13+00:00): Zone6
emersonveenstra (2022-09-12 21:35:52+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! Please make sure you look at the warnings displayed before you save, in this changeset you didn't properly tag the foot paths. They should all have highway=footway, not footway=sidewalk (despite the common American usage, in OSM sidewalks are only for paths alongside a road). Would you mind fixing those? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-09-26 11:43:03+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126652242
ruugie (2022-09-14 13:22:36+00:00): Hashtags are really deceptive. Please only use freetext changeset comments to avoid placing "Mizoram" into Ghana.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-12 22:40:54+00:00): Do you think that address interpolation should be existing here?
felipeeugenio (2022-09-12 22:45:02+00:00): Hello. Yes. Till we add each house numbers is a good approximation.
Besides, the people in charge of the protect that made the mistake deleted a lot.
Regards
GerdP (2022-11-05 14:14:23+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier https://www.osm.org/way/826125620 einen Weg von highway=construction auf highway=path geändert, aber die Berechtigungen auf no belassen. Absicht?
Cowboy79 (2022-11-05 16:40:25+00:00): Wahrscheinlich nicht, aber man sollte sich das nochmal vor Ort ansehen. Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, war die komplette Baustelle fertig und alle Wege freigegeben. Auch "unpaved" ist sehr wahrscheinlich nicht korrekt.
Cowboy79 (2022-11-06 17:51:14+00:00): War heute dort und habe alles korrigiert.
GerdP (2022-11-06 19:06:47+00:00): Prima, danke Dir!
skquinn (2022-09-20 07:16:11+00:00): Hi Maps Man,

Going forward, please use meaningful changeset comments. “Changes” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing, and is no more useful than a blank changeset comment. Thanks!
Supaplex (2022-09-13 03:37:11+00:00): Hi,

It seems the changeset is so big that is hard to verify. Please make it much smaller.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126107839
user_15552334 (2022-09-13 07:33:46+00:00): This is a proxy user for Wheelmap, but yeah this is an awful changeset size, rated bad.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126107839
Sheroe (2022-10-27 14:51:47+00:00): Hi, this Svenja from Wheelmap.org. We know that these big changesets are annoying. We really want to optimize this, but unfortunately it takes longer than planned.
The problem is on our to-do list. I ask for a little more patience.
Kind regards, Svenja
SomeoneElse (2022-09-12 22:45:11+00:00): Oops - forgot to close changeset.  There's nothing other than in the very northeast and the very southwest, honest.
emersonveenstra (2022-09-12 23:24:15+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contributions to OSM! maxspeed tags need to go on the road for them to be usable by navigation software, so you should put `maxspeed=45 mph` on the section of road that the sign is for.
Stugg1e (2022-09-13 01:08:44+00:00): How do you do it when the road has a speed limit that changes half way along the road?
Allison P (2022-09-13 02:11:19+00:00): Split the way by creating a node where the speed limit changes (if one doesn't exist), selecting it, then pressing X. You can add the speed limit tag to that.

It's okay to tag the speed limit sign separately, if you want. The speed limit shows up either way.
mcliquid (2022-09-15 17:48:23+00:00): Hi, du hast in diesem Changeset die Reitherstraße durch das Löschen eines Teils komplett unterbrochen. War das beabsichtigt? Schaust du dir das nochmal an?
Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/46.96220/15.80663
mcliquid (2022-09-18 15:40:58+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126224751
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
AMMilliman (2022-09-17 10:38:17+00:00): This is a regular, ground level parking lot with solar canopies. I have driven by it.
emersonveenstra (2022-09-19 17:32:25+00:00): Hi,

Same thing here, please fix the opening hours. Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-09-26 11:46:43+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126652431
emersonveenstra (2022-09-19 17:08:08+00:00): Hi,

The opening hours for Anna's house is invalid. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for the correct opening hours syntax. Thanks!
Allison P (2022-09-21 23:02:52+00:00): Also phone number and website are wrong, there should be no parenthesis and the protocol needs to be specified (URL needs to start with http:// or https://)
emersonveenstra (2022-09-26 11:46:37+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126652431
TimothyOnline (2022-11-12 20:23:54+00:00): Noted.  Will use correct syntax next time.  Thanks.
julcnx (2022-09-13 10:50:12+00:00): Hello. The hostel was already added so I removed your new node. Please update the existing node if the information is not up to date. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6964288706/history#map=19/18.78039/99.00632
tastrax (2022-09-30 07:07:16+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
watmildon (2022-09-13 23:50:21+00:00): Thanks for updating this. A few of us in the US OSM slack are trying to get through all the renames. You're welcome to join us of course! https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
Frans S (2022-09-13 10:53:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions). Keep in mind that most building have a strict rectangular pattern



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126110470
Joseph R P (2022-09-29 22:35:16+00:00): Please don't downgrade trunk routes like this back to primary. Controversial road changes like these should be discussed first.
Dino Michelini (2022-09-13 17:39:46+00:00): Ciao, ti segnalo che le correzioni sulle geometrie fatte ricalcando le immagini satellitari di Bing non sono precise come quelle di Esri o le ortofoto del PCN (immagini più precise addirittura di un rilievo GPS fatto con smartphone. (vedi wiki di OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_practice#Allinea_le_immagini_aeree_prima_di_ricalcare; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Esri; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Italy/PCN; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Test_the_accuracy_of_GPS_devices). Poichè l'area è stata mappata in precedenza utilizzando immagini Esri, ortofoto PCN e rilievi GPS corretti in post-processing, queste correzioni sulla posizione non hanno molto senso... Prima di fare un ricalco da Bing, per evitare errori simili, sarebbe opportuno verificare quale base geometrica (immagini/ortofoto) hanno utilizzato in precedenza altri mappatori. Inoltre, si dovrebbe correggere lo scostamento (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database) che hanno le immagini Bing rispetto a Esri e PCN.
Layft Greater (2023-06-27 17:28:51+00:00): Limassol Marina Parking is no longer visible on map after this edit

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36072195/history
RiverBearings (2022-09-27 22:41:28+00:00): Сәлем evgeniyakz. Мен сіз OSM-дегі соңғы жұмысыңызда https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358461782 (ref=KF-24) сияқты Қазақстан тас жолы жүйесін жаңартып жатқаныңызды байқадым.

Маған бұл жаңартуларды жасау үшін қандай ресурстарды пайдаланып жатқаныңыз қызық. OSM өңдеу және/немесе болашақ өзгерістерді тексеру үшін үлкен OpenStreetMap қауымдастығымен ортақ пайдалануға болатын анықтамалық ресурс болса, оны https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Kazakhstan бетіне қосуға болады ма? Алдыңғы сілтеме мәндерінің кейбірін old_ref тегіне жылжыту керектігін білесіз бе?

Жаңа реф жүйесін түсінудегі көмегіңіз өте жоғары бағаланады.
-RiverBearings

Hello evgeniyakz. I noticed that you have been updating the Kazahkstan highway ref system like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358461782 (ref=KF-24) in your recent work in OSM. 

I am curious what resources you are using to make these updates. If there is a ref resource that can be shared with the larger OpenStreetMap community to edit OSM and/or verify future changes, could that be added to the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Kazakhstan page? Do you know if some of the previous ref values should be moved to an old_ref tag? 

Your help in understanding the new ref system would be greatly appreciated.  -RiverBearings
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:49:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094029258/history has NO = 19 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Masherbrum (2025-05-14 18:35:13+00:00): Hi Mateusz, similar to what my colleague explained in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126174651, I simply moved tags over from a POI (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1230822167/history) to the building polygon here. I recommend reaching out to the original user (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/humano) who added that POI feature for more information regarding those tags. Thanks and happy mapping!
MindaugasS (2022-09-21 22:33:49+00:00): Šiaip tai puiku, tik man ne visos tame kapinių plane pažymėtos sektorių ribos tikrovėje pasirodė tikri takai, o labiau tokie siauri ad hoc praėjimai tarp antkapių. Beje, pažiūrėkit šitą LiDAR: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?layers=c8d189e080b647bf80ca0898fdf605df ; tada reikia pasididinti norimą vietą ir iš meniu „Basemap“ pasirinkti „Reljefas su žymėmis“; tada galima dar didinti. Miškų ir parkų takai tarp medžių pasimato kaip ant delno :)
DaanLT (2022-09-22 04:17:24+00:00): na čia senos kapinės, dalis takų tokie ir yra 'bet kur', nes kitaip ir nepraeisi.
už nuorodą ačiū - pravers
michalgwo (2023-06-09 09:05:18+00:00): Cześć, jesteś pewny ze jest tutaj defibrylator? Byłem tam niedawno i nie mogłem go znaleźć, widziałem tylko apteczke, ale nie bylo przy niej charakterystycznego zielonego znaku AED
Piskvor (2022-09-13 15:53:24+00:00): Hello, 

while it is *technically* possible to ride a bike on a footway, and unlikely to be ticketed for it, the footways in CZ are implicitly forbidden to bikes (by the road code), unless explicitly marked as allowed (for example the footway linked below, across Hlávkův bridge). Please don't tag "I can physically ride here" as  "bicycle=*" - that's a tag for legal access right, in other words "the law normally allows/prohibits bicycles on this type of way, but an explicit exception is marked here". If this path is actually marked "bicycles allowed", then the tag is appropriate. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Dyes


https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.095549911110965&lng=14.437296655555997&z=17&pKey=208749867596809&x=0.7325389764508664&y=0.33996725037323283&zoom=0.8736263736263736
Piskvor (2022-09-13 15:55:15+00:00): (the reason for the explicit segway ban is that they're classified as pedestrians by the law)
user_2066394 (2022-09-13 08:31:31+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/118852539
Was hat sich da baulich verändert?
Gutrune_6020 (2023-07-09 21:14:23+00:00): Die öffentlich Passage des Schwentlinghofes, verläuft nun südlich des Hofes
SekeRob (2022-09-15 19:33:30+00:00): Hi

Your corrections have created quite a few broken state issues per the change set summary, to start with the chaos on the farmland relation. Any plans to fix this or should the rescue troops be called in?
SekeRob (2022-09-17 07:18:51+00:00): Ciao,

Sul mio commento alla tua modifica precedente, dopo aver apportato altre correzioni, la relazione con i terreni agricoli è simile a questa

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1274103

Più righe che (ancora) non hanno alcun senso.

Il Turbo Overpass mostra il prima e il dopo

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126115689&relations=true

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126115513&relations=true

Le linee rosse sono quelle che sono state spostate o cancellate.

Le immagini satellitari mostrano che l'area in generale è stata classificata correttamente come terreno agricolo. Le piccole macchie che hai mappato sono contrassegnate come "interne" al grande terreno agricolo, tranne per il fatto che la maggior parte del contorno del terreno agricolo è sparita.

Non fa bene.

Hi,

On my comment to your previous edit, after you making some more corrections, the farmland relation looks like this

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1274103

Multiple lines that (still) make no sense at all.

Turbo overpass shows the before and after

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126115689&relations=true

https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126115513&relations=true

The red lines are those that got moved or deleted.

Sat imagery shows the area in general was classed correctly as farmland. The small patches you mapped are tagged as 'inner' to the large farmland, except most of the farmland outline is gone.

Not good.
eggie (2022-09-15 11:37:54+00:00): Meestal zijn dit highway=path  Dus gewoon paden en niet een aangegeven wandelpad. 

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway

Waar je pad het water doorsnijdt is wellicht een bruggetje.. bridge=yes layer=1 en anderes op de kruising tussen water en pad een ford=yes (doorwaadbare plaats)
Dus hoe kom je het water over? 
gr eggie
aceman444 (2023-01-08 11:20:22+00:00): Teraz tie bridge:name zase bezhlavo odstranujete spat. Tu aj mal zmysel, kedze ulica sa vola Michalska a nazov mostu sa teda odlisuje.
mapperue (2023-01-08 11:23:05+00:00): Je to opravené.
aceman444 (2023-01-08 11:43:47+00:00): Dakujem. Skontrolujte si teda aj ostatne zmeny, kedze aj zadanie bridge:name, aj jeho revertovanie ste robili nespravne.
impiaaa (2022-09-13 19:07:34+00:00): Please use a more descriptive changeset comment, including what you changed - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . boundary=administrative+admin_level=6 is inappropriate for a fire district, since that tag is for counties, which already tile California - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_admin_level .
willkmis (2022-09-13 21:41:02+00:00): Agree with impiaaa here on both points. Please use descriptive changesets. I also think that boundary=administrative +admin_level=6 appears inappropriate for these data, as it is reserved for counties in CA.
Ahmed MR1 (2022-09-14 09:11:03+00:00): تف
نورس الطائر (2022-09-14 15:37:02+00:00): شنو تف؟
abakus_uploader (2022-09-13 22:31:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Troy Blankenship (2022-09-15 13:48:01+00:00): Please be sure that the address that is being placed on the map matches what the Waupaca County Land Information office has in the GIS for that particular fire number. These 3rd party services can cause huge headaches for the homeowner or business for home/business delivery when the "on line" address does not match the "on the ground" address. Please refer here to match an address correctly: https://public1.co.waupaca.wi.us/land-records-viewer/
eggie (2022-09-13 07:42:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-13 07:52:34+00:00): Feedback.. 
Inderdaad geen highway=residential. 
Er is hier wel een voetgangersoversteekplaats. Nu is de routering weer hersteld.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-13 08:29:39+00:00): Aanvulling voor de duidelijkheid wat ik heb gedaan. Voetgangers verbindingen en oversteek toegevoegd.
rarad74 (2022-09-13 10:08:51+00:00): Salut. Esti sigur ca acest tag este scris bine? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxaxleload?uselang=en

"maxaxleload"
szjozsef (2022-09-13 10:38:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxaxleload
szjozsef (2022-09-13 10:41:52+00:00): asa pare, ca e bine, este conform cu indicatorul, sau imi scapa ceva ?
rarad74 (2022-09-13 15:08:54+00:00): Salut. Nu e de indicator. Credeam ca e scris gresit tagul. "suna" ciudat. Pe urma am vazut in link-ul cu descrierea tag-ului ca e ok.
ma-rt-in (2022-09-15 17:07:33+00:00): Hallo,

wie lang geht den die Sperrung?

vg
ti motius (2022-09-23 09:47:57+00:00): Moin! Laut HPA bis 30.10. 19:00 Uhr
VG
juminet (2022-09-15 10:13:39+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM!

Merci pour cette correction. Je l'avais détecté comme suspecte il y a qq jours et je suis heureux que quelqu'un de local ait pu la corriger.

Happy mapping, 

juminet
SomeoneElse (2022-09-13 09:09:08+00:00): Er, "contact me in private message for souces" isn't really OK.  Please include source details here.
user_15552334 (2022-09-13 15:38:55+00:00): source
https://radiotamazuj.org/en/news/article/four-soldiers-die-at-luri-river-crossing#:~:text=The%20Luri%20Bridge%20collapsed%20in,the%20reconstruction%20of%20the%20bridge.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oEK6PHWToc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikH1Atc7oAw
SomeoneElse (2022-09-13 16:09:49+00:00): Thanks!
user_15552334 (2022-09-13 17:48:00+00:00): sorry about that, also nearby is the"a43" on the other side of Luri confusing people, in 2012 OSM shows South Sudan roads as A or B, but now its just a different number for each road, any clarification?
6CL0VU2TR9 (2022-09-13 07:52:35+00:00): ¡Seguro! Lo corregiré.
Map-Peter (2022-09-25 14:00:24+00:00): Hallo kartler175,
 
mir ist gerade aufgefallen das https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14574407 eine Wiese quasi im Zentrum und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40345923 hat, welche beide nun - in OSM - ausgenommen sind aus dem gesamten Wisentreservat. Beides gehört aber dazu. Bitte entsprechend korrigieren. Vielen Dank
 
... Vielen Dank auch das du hier bereits geholfen hast MP-inner-roles zu korrigieren.
 
PS: Ich will das MP nicht kaputt machen und bitte dich deshalb das Ganze direkt selbst zu korrigieren.
 
Gruß Peter