piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:31:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:57:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
kkkk4 (2018-06-12 11:48:12+00:00): sourceを変更し忘れました。
正しくは GSImaps/ort;GSImaps/std です。
mavl (2018-07-20 13:58:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Howpper (2018-06-12 11:51:33+00:00): (for Grand Junction)
mavl (2018-07-20 13:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:32:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:58:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
freebeer (2018-07-05 19:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60445289 where the changeset comment is: undo mistaken addition of tunnels going under bridges for ground-level roadways after discussion with mapper
mavl (2018-07-20 13:47:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:41:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:26:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Self-Perfection (2018-07-14 19:42:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. Во-первых, спасибо за вклад в уточнение карты. А во-вторых хочу указать вам нам совершённую вами в первых правках типичную для новичка ошибку. Тег name используется только для указания имени собственного, так что name="Детская площадка" - ошибка (эта информация и так содержится в leisure=playground) Подробнее разъяснения можете посмотреть в вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
rex216 (2018-07-14 21:12:44+00:00): Большое спасибо за разъяснение. Впредь буду внимательнее!
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:52:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:52:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:48:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Jiryes (2018-06-12 12:12:30+00:00): #SalesforceIL
user_5359 (2018-06-12 17:02:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft
Anakil (2018-06-13 08:19:42+00:00): Bonjour Foly09,

Attention quand tu traces ton bâtiment, de ne pas faire de duplicata (ici il y avait deux fois le bâtiment, j'ai retiré une des deux copies). :-) 

J'ai aussi retiré le tag "sidewalk (trottoir)" sur le chemin piéton plus à gauche, car ce n'est pas un trottoir (le tag sert à indiquer un trottoir le long d'une rue qui serait séparé par de l'herbe ou une barrière). 

Merci de vos contributions et continuez ! :-) 

Happy mapping,
Anakil
Tomas Straupis (2018-07-26 07:39:57+00:00): Su šituo keliu neaišku:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596927121
highway=footway sako, kad tai pėstiesiems skirtas kelias, tuo tarpu bicycle=designated sako, kad tai būtent dviratininkams skirtas kelias. Tai neaišku, kas čia yra. Jei ir pėstiesiems, ir dviratininkams (ir yra atitinkamas ženklas), tai tada reikėtų žymėti highway=path+bicycle=designated+foot=designated.
ruboqif (2018-12-07 21:37:52+00:00): Bonjour, 
Petite question, pourquoi avoir créé une nouvelle voie sur l'avenue Philippe Solari pour les bus dans le sens descendant au lieu de simplement rajouter des attributs sur celle existante ? (lanes=2, lanes:bus=1) (comme c'est le cas partout dans aix, comme sur le boulevard périphérique par exemple) Surtout que c'est quasiment invisible sur le rendu OSM.
Désolé pour la demande 6 mois après... :D
user_16038 (2018-12-11 09:13:36+00:00): Bonjour,
SI je me souviens bien :
1) Quelqu'un avait commencé le travail en opérant de la sorte
2) J'avais trouvé le procédé justifié car les chaussées sont physiquement séparées en différents endroits (îlots en béton, barrières, feux tricolores).
ruboqif (2018-12-11 09:43:42+00:00): Effectivement, il y a quelques îlot ici et là, je n'y avais pas pensé donc oui au final c'est justifié. On regrettera que la voie ne soit pas assez visible mais de toute manière il s'agit d'une voie bus uniquement.
Par contre il y a eu des travaux récemment en bas de l'avenue devant l'hopital avec la prolongation de la voie bus. Du repérage à faire pour editer la carte.
mavl (2018-07-20 14:00:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:44:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
praeteritum (2022-08-20 19:32:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125160118.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:59:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Minh Nguyen (2019-05-01 05:05:38+00:00): The admin_level=4 tag was intended to clarify that this boundary=national_park does not, in fact, represent a national park but rather a state park. With the removal of the admin_level tag, it may be necessary to indicate its lesser importance in some other way, such as a different boundary tag.
inah_telenav (2019-05-06 09:06:07+00:00): Hi
I modified the boundary tag to state park, but admin_level=4 is used for State, District, Territory or Commonwealth see:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_admin_level

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#11_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dnational_park
Minh Nguyen (2019-05-06 17:40:05+00:00): I’m not sure I understand. This is a state park, not a national park. admin_level=4 was used to clarify that the boundary is for a state park, despite the (admittedly confusing) boundary=national_park tag. The admin_level tag didn’t indicate that this *is* a state; that would require boundary=administrative.

The combination of boundary=national_park + admin_level=4 was common in the U.S. before you systematically removed all the admin_level tags. Since you disagree with the admin_level tags on non-administrative boundaries, do you have a preferred, machine-readable way to distinguish national parks from state parks? In many cases, state parks are functionally equivalent to national parks, just with a different level of ownership.

Without a replacement tagging scheme, I would be tempted to revert this and similar changes, since it’s unlikely that a data consumer would mistakenly treat boundary=national_park admin_level=4 as a state administrative boundary.
inah_telenav (2019-05-08 10:18:37+00:00): Hi,
If you look at the wiki pages of national_park, protected areas, you can see that the admin_level tag dose not apply. If you want to clarify that it is a state park, the tags: governance_type=* or  site_ownership=* could be applied.
Minh Nguyen (2019-05-10 20:56:49+00:00): site_ownership=regional on boundary=protected_area may be workable, though it’s considerably more ambiguous than admin_level=4. It sounds like county parks would also be tagged boundary=protected_area site_ownership=regional.

Since it appears that you systematically removed admin_level=4 without any replacement from state parks across the U.S., would you mind adding site_ownership=regional to the parks you touched? It’s difficult for anyone else to do it because you edited each park in its own changeset. If not, a listing or GeoJSON of the parks you touched would be fine; then the community could coordinate changes on our end, either using Maproulette or something more manual.

Finally, please note that admin_level=* certainly may be used on features that are not boundary=administrative or boundary=*. admin_level=* is a secondary tag that can be applied in combination with various primary tags, not all of which are boundary=*. This much is clear from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/admin_level#combinations .
praeteritum (2022-08-20 19:31:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125160086.
santamariense (2018-06-13 01:18:18+00:00): A marcação da área do condomínio como área residencial estava certa.
Não havia motivo para apagá-la. Apenas estava faltando o nome.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59777640
LukinhaPKN (2018-06-13 16:30:42+00:00): Exato
santamariense (2018-06-13 17:02:40+00:00): Só para esclarecer uma coisinha... Perguntei a um mapeador que também joga Pokemón e ele esclareceu que um local mapeado como área residencial não interfere no jogo, nem positivamente nem negativamente. E se interferisse, não faz sentindo, cabendo reclamar com a Niantic, pois no caso ela não estaria  usando corretamente os dados.
eggie (2018-06-12 15:39:18+00:00): In de Bagviewer staat ook niets meer
Martin van Wieringen (2018-06-13 20:08:04+00:00): Ja, dat klopt. Ik was vandaag op die plek en er is nu een grote greppel met kabels gegraven op de plek van Leidsevaart 7. In verband met N444 verbreding maar er staat nog wel een klein huisje achter de greppel met een hek er om heen. Lijkt erop dat ik die niet had moeten verwijderen 😢 Deze changeset terugdraaien is dat mogelijk voor alleen dat derde meeste rechtse huisje. Leidsevaart 7 is wel echt weg.
eggie (2018-06-13 21:35:38+00:00): Ik kan alleen alles terugdraaien en daarna de grotere gebeouwen verwijderen. Zal even in de BAG viewer kijken.
eggie (2018-06-13 21:43:16+00:00): gelukt!  Kleine gebouw is weer terug.
Martin van Wieringen (2018-06-14 04:58:59+00:00): Geweldig, bedankt.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:41:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:30:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
praeteritum (2022-08-20 19:29:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125160062.
Hjart (2018-06-12 13:04:42+00:00): Jeg tror lige vi bliver nødt til at rulle denne ændring tilbage
KasperLanng (2018-06-12 13:15:13+00:00): ruller du min ændring tilbage? på hvilken baggrund gør du dette?

hilsen kasperlanng
Hjart (2018-06-12 13:21:13+00:00): Jeg er stærkt uenig i de ændringer du lavede her.
Du bl.a. har sat bygnings tags på en række adressenoder der alle er placeret inde i i forvejen definerede bygningspolygoner. + sat legeplads inden i en i forvejen defineret legeplads polygon + sat restaurent ved siden af en i forvejen angivet restaurant.
Hjart (2018-06-12 13:21:58+00:00): Altsammen noget vi under normale omstædigheder regner for fejl
KasperLanng (2018-06-12 13:23:16+00:00): okay tænkte bare de var tomme og derfor rettede jeg det til hvad jeg tænkte var korrekt, den del kan jeg så godt forstå men tænkte det var sådan man gjorde. Den del er fair nok 
Hilsen Kasper
Hjart (2018-06-12 13:30:38+00:00): De er ikke tomme. De er præcist som de skal være
KasperLanng (2018-06-12 13:36:16+00:00): okay, men så bare sådan ud inde i redigeringen prøvede at gøre mit bedste for at gøre mappet mere præcist
hilsen Kasper
Hjart (2018-06-12 13:44:15+00:00): Reverteren fungerer desværre ikke korrekt idag, så jeg har ikke umiddelbart kunnet fikse den ødelagte adresse: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/341804984
Hjart (2018-06-12 13:46:37+00:00): Jeg må bede dig om mere omhyggeligt at gennemgå vejledningen inden du evt kaster dig ud i flere ændringer.
praeteritum (2022-08-20 19:28:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125160020.
praeteritum (2022-08-20 19:27:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125159992.
Osm1980 (2018-07-20 17:19:57+00:00): salam bashgah savarkari ba tage locality moshakhas nemishe!
praeteritum (2022-08-20 19:27:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125159925.
flohoff (2018-06-12 17:04:07+00:00): HI Klameng,

ist das richtig das hier auf dem Node das man_made=surveillance verschwunden ist?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4406912518
flohoff (2018-06-12 17:05:49+00:00): 
Hab noch einen - Auf dem hier hast du opening_hours eingetragen. Allerdings Di - Fr 08:00 - 12:00 was ja nicht dem opening_hours format entspricht.

Das sollte ja kein "Freitext" rein sondern das ist definiert wie das aufgebaut ist um maschinenparsebar zu sein:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5683101461
viloan (2018-06-12 13:18:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
highflyer74 (2018-06-13 07:46:35+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
rab (2018-10-29 18:52:30+00:00): hi,
could you please fix this note:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1571459#map=19/-17.87451/31.00787&layers=N

thanks
yaugenka (2018-07-01 16:04:23+00:00): Привет!
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=243020687
на месте урочища необязательно была деревня,  поэтому в abandoned:place лучше оставлять то, что раньше было в place.
user_5359 (2018-06-12 16:55:38+00:00): Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft
praeteritum (2022-08-20 19:25:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125159894.
frosm (2018-06-15 17:51:09+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
qu'est-ce que c'est exactement ? un lieu d'exposition en extérieur ?
AnnaMoffo (2018-06-18 12:17:21+00:00): Bonjour frosm,
le "Petit Temple" est surtout un lieu pour des expositions d’art - interieur… il y a u petit cour devant, mais rarement utiliser pour une « rallonge » des expo…
Regardez www.artganges.org… la site est encore un peu "sous construction" mais il y a déjà quelques photos visibles
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-08-02 13:19:39+00:00): Porque você criou vias sobre outras aqui? Não era só dividir e renomear as já existentes?