piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
_torsten_ (2017-05-23 05:45:00+00:00): Danke! Es gibt wirklich merkwürdige Namen. Wir haben hier einen Weg, der heißt Wanderweg. Und das steht auf dem zugehörigen Straßennamensschild. 
;-)
maraf24 (2015-05-19 17:49:24+00:00): Nie ma już stacji LPG przy Pułaskiego?
maraf24 (2015-05-20 11:44:26+00:00): This is natural=rock. Polish name should be in name tag, german in name:de.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-09 12:48:35+00:00): Hi - I'm guessing you meant "leaf_type=broadleaved" not "leaf_type 	broad_leaved" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345895603 et al as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leaf%20type?uselang=en-GB

I've just tidied up a load of mine in Clipstone...
SK53 (2015-06-09 13:34:13+00:00): Yeah can never remember there are at least 3 options with underscore, hyphen or nowt.
mavl (2015-05-18 17:02:15+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Почему здесь появился железнодорожный переезд? Уточните, что вы имели в виду.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3525456761/history
sylver81 (2015-06-10 19:02:22+00:00): Habe momentan keinen PC zugriff. Meine Änderung war ein Irrtum, wie ich feststellen muss. Bitte aus der B509 wieder die L473 machen, danke.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-23 10:55:22+00:00): W OSM nie używamy skrótów w nazwach ulic, więc: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=49943831
MKnight (2015-09-03 12:38:15+00:00): Durchgehend=24 Stunden?
Was ist mit Dienstag=Sonntag gemeint?
scai (2015-05-18 15:58:42+00:00): Ich glaube, das Freibad hier hat den falschen Namen bekommen :)
pmailkeey (2015-06-18 15:25:11+00:00): Section between A5092 and A590 is signed in white signs - so your change is incorrect. Please revert that bit.
XaMi (2015-05-24 22:33:23+00:00): I assume way 119010957 is no building.
Why adding shop=car_repair to building (way 107539548), when all other tags are applied to way 119010957?
R0bst3r (2015-05-26 22:27:16+00:00): The first way is the area where the cars for sale are parked. The second way is the building where the car repair takes place.
A previous mapper prefered his car sale tags on the area. I would prefer the shop tags (and maybe also the adress tags) on the building(s). Car sale and rental are also different services.
XaMi (2015-06-07 09:40:33+00:00): I did not complain about any POI tagging. You added building=yes to way 119010957, which I assumed as wrong. Because I have no local knowledge I did not change data.
According to your previous comment "The first way is the area where the cars for sale are parked", it seems I was right.
Gumeg (2015-06-23 07:18:20+00:00): Pls read notes before making changes. The true way was to delete this line.
RichRico (2015-10-21 22:01:31+00:00): I do not remove the line because there was a note, I was in the task of "highway intersects highway"
Durko_freemap (2015-05-22 10:54:13+00:00): Zdravim, zadal ste sem addr:street=Okoličianská, je to spravne?, lebo v okoli sa taky nazov ulice nenachadza.
MarioGuzi (2015-05-23 16:37:30+00:00): ano, pretoze cela ta hlavna cesta nie je Garbiarska, ale Okolicianska, az zhruba po most, cca 1km smerom na zapad.. Dalej je to cca 2km ulica 1. maja, proste cele to oznacenie je zle ... Ja to ale neviem v mape zmenit.
Durko_freemap (2015-05-23 17:32:55+00:00): Zdravim, ak ma budete navigovat tak ja to opravim, dnes som nastavil ulicu 1.maja (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31402871) od mosta smerom do mesta. Okoličianská je teda smerom na vychod od mosta po koniec mesta? Vdaka za odpoved.
streckenkundler (2015-05-18 17:24:57+00:00): Bist du dir sicher, daß dieser Weg ein reiner Fahradweg ist, auf dem keine Fußgänger, Anlieger (das einzelne Gehöft am Weg) oder land- oder forstwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge der Bewirtschafter der angrenzenden Felder und Wälder fahren dürfen? 

Denn das hast du aus diesem Weg gemacht. 

Sven
toschroe (2015-05-19 14:56:38+00:00): Danke Sven. 
War mein erster Eintrag und ich lerne erst. Habe von benachbarten Einträgen abgeguckt gehabt. Habe die Werte auf einen, wie ich finde, besseren Stand gebracht und den Hochladekommentar wesentlich präzisiert.
Zwar ist die Straße asphaltiert und als Fahrradstraße gewidmet, aber aus Fördermitteln des Landwirtschaftsbaus umgebaut und mit zehn Ausweichstellen versehen, kann man sicher davon ausgehen, das sie primär für die Fahrradfahrer bestimmt ist, aber natürlich auch für Fußgänger, landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr frei ist. Das kleine Stück vorn, habe ich wieder extra (es war vorher schon extra gesetzt gewesen) und auf residential gesetzt. 
Torsten
streckenkundler (2015-05-19 15:26:38+00:00): Hallo Thorsten... Kein Problem...

JOSM hat ja eine Menge Vorlagen, es gibt auch noch mehr, die man sich nachladen kann. Bei den Vorlagen unter Straßen ist auch eine für Fahradstraßen dabei. Schaue dir diese mal an... auf alle Fälle muß noch ein bicyle_road=yes gesetzt werden.

In der Burgschen Ecke dürften ohnehin noch einige Fahrradstraßen fehlen... Von Lübben aus das abzuradeln dauert etwas. Die Ausweichstellen kannst du als Punkt mit highway=passing_place  erfassen..
Viele Grüße,

Sven
SomeoneElse (2015-05-19 14:09:44+00:00): Hello - I think something went a bit wrong with a few things here - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346025005/history looked implausible for a path or road (and there were a couple of others in the other changesets).

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190037257 had also gone a bit wrong - it seemed to double back on itself.  

If you're trying to record "personal routes" OpenStreetMap isn't really the place for it (thoough lots of places that use OSM data) might be.  If you want to create a "personal map" perhaps something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ might be what you were looking for?

I've undone the problematical changes in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31284880 .
mavl (2015-05-19 18:44:52+00:00): Случайно "просочился" тег addr2:housename (вместо housenumber).

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217159570
CenTex Chris (2015-05-18 17:28:44+00:00): Place name spelling corrected.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-19 14:24:52+00:00): Is it actually meaningful to tag an ASL on a way like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204790848 ?
SomeoneElse (2015-06-08 12:02:53+00:00): Looks like something went wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262258996 here - it now has mangled layer tags of "2;1;2".
tms13 (2015-06-10 18:13:57+00:00): Thanks - fix committed.
d1g (2015-10-17 17:56:24+00:00): Неправильное тегирование здесь не 190 amenity=grave_yard, а одно.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

amenity=grave_yard 189 тегов нужно убрать и оставить либо один общий контур либо мультиполигон
d1g (2015-10-17 17:58:11+00:00): В JOSM легко быстро выбрать свои объекты через CTRL+F "amenity=grave_yard changeset:31264238" и поправить теги
d1g (2016-04-12 17:49:51+00:00): Здесь же одно кладбище, правильно?
CloCkWeRX (2015-12-28 11:25:02+00:00): This intersects a lot of buildings; also sourced from digitalglobe - which is more accurate? The existing building data, or road?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-25 08:45:07+00:00): A co to? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346063172
Pytam bo: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/369477#map=16/52.6885/21.9771&layers=N
wajak (2015-05-25 11:33:41+00:00): Nie mam pojęcia. Poprawiłem. Dla mnie to jakiś błąd w JOSM, ale też dziwne, bo ta droga ma dosyć nietypowy kształt.
eBin (2015-05-25 11:57:12+00:00): DW627 jest zaraz obok i ma taki sam kształt.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-25 16:41:49+00:00): Może jakieś zabłąkane copy-pasta? :-)
GerdP (2015-10-31 10:51:06+00:00): bitte prüfen:
way 346064034
has das unübliche tag highway=sidewalk.
User Nemax schlägt vor, den Weg zu löschen, wahrscheinlich, weil er parallel zu
way 275993955 läuft, der mit sidewalk=both gemappt ist.
Vielleicht auch nur diesen Teil löschen und den Rest auf highway=footway ändern mit evtl. bicycle=*
ohligser (2015-10-31 23:49:46+00:00): Hi,
hab um den kritisierten Way alle Straßen mit sidewalk-Tag versehen und dem Way  346064034 sein highway=sidewalk ganz weggenommen. Sollte so strukturell passen.
Anm: Auch wenn die Historie es behauptet, ist der Way 346064034 nicht von mir.
Schönes WE, ohligser
GerdP (2015-11-01 06:56:28+00:00): Danke :-)
waldhans (2015-05-18 22:56:37+00:00): Woher hast du die Daten fuer die Grenze? Ich habe sie klar als "Vermessungsamt .." deklariert. Sende mir bitte deine Unterlagen, die muessen ja noch besser sein. 

(Hinweis: die Grenzen sind exakt, deine Eingaben nicht)
Samson47918 (2015-05-19 19:42:15+00:00): Hallo, zugegebenermassen bin ich wohl noch ein Mapper-Newbie. Aber wenn Du Dir an dieser Stelle den Grenzverlauf unter www.tim-online.nrw.de anschaust, dann sieht der Grenzverlauf dort wesentlich plausibler aus (parallel zur Oedter Strasse ) als das, was vorher war( Grenze querte mehrfach die Oedter Strasse). Und die Daten unter Tim-Online werden auch von GIS-Bereich als offiziell angesehen. Habe mich mit einer GIS-Expertin in meiner Firma unterhalten. 
Zugegebenermassen habe ich die Grenze erstmal nur parallel zur Oedter Strasse geschoben(auf einem kleinen Stück), noch ohne einzelnen Knoten genauste Koordinaten zuzuweisen, dass kann aber nachgeholt werden. Wenn ich damit falsch liegen sollte, lasse ich mich gern belehren.
Samson47918 (2015-05-19 19:51:21+00:00): Nachtrag: Ich habe auch nur das Stück von "An Haus Steinfunder" bis "Zur Alten Schmiede" bearbeitet.
jumbanho (2015-05-19 11:34:32+00:00): Hi, I see that this is your first edit.  Welcome to OSM!  We need all the mappers we can get and the best way to learn is to map things near where you live and work. However, it is generally not acceptable to make fictional edits.  This ads clutter to the database.

If you are looking for help, there are plenty of sources available.  Here is a pretty good one: http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/
Also, you can ask questions at the forums: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/

If you want to ask questions of a live, local mapper, I'd be happy to answer those too.
jumbanho (2015-05-22 22:51:35+00:00): I'm going to revert this changeset, since it appears to all be fictional.
jambamkin (2024-02-16 21:01:13+00:00): Hi drnoble, Sorry to dig out this super old changeset you added cutting=yes on Strathfillan Road w302600757 here. Is that correct?
James
drnoble (2024-03-02 11:42:39+00:00): No, have removed it :)
Thanks for flagging, Donald
Larry0ua (2015-06-16 08:55:50+00:00): Как по google maps?? Быстро читать http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5257

Чтоб помочь найти новые карты, надо знать, где брались старые карты, для какого устройства, для какой программы.
VinceTraveller (2015-05-18 21:29:16+00:00): bug 340085
naoliv (2015-08-18 18:46:56+00:00): tenentebirula, você está inserindo vários nomes de rua que não deveriam estar presentes no mapa. Por exemplo, "Retorno", "Avesso", "Via de ligação", etc. Este tipo de informação não deve ser inserido. Se a via não possui nome, deve deixar sem nada.
naoliv (2015-08-18 18:50:13+00:00): *Acesso
Peter Dobratz (2015-06-04 21:01:23+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.  You placed a Node in the middle of a building here with tags on it for the A-Boy hardware store, but it turns out this information is already tagged on the building outline.  Generally putting the tags on the building outline is considered the preferred approach and considered a higher level of detail.  In any case, we want to avoid duplicate data where possible, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Let me know if you have any questions.
Paul Cone (2015-06-04 21:25:57+00:00): Peter, the problem with that approach is if you need to use a derivative of the polygon dataset for other purposes, you will not get everything you need, i.e. because not ALL of the hardware stores have polygons, one must use the point data, too.  I understand that having the feature only once is the preferred approach, but until the data catches up with the policy, I think it's better to have both a point and a polygon rather than have to use both and then go through the task of weeding out duplicates.
Peter Dobratz (2015-06-04 22:47:34+00:00): Yes, there will be some hardware stores in OSM as single Nodes and some as Closed-Way polygons.  Additionally, there are Relation objects of type multipolygon which might be hardware stores (buildings with a courtyard or multiple buildings).  The shop=hardware and contact info tags should be on either the Node, the Closed-Way, or the multipolygon Relation.  It's bad practice to put the tags on more than one of these 3 options.

We shouldn't be adding duplicate data into OSM on purpose just to facilitate the needs of a particular data consumer.  You should be able to convert polygons to points to facilitate your processing of the data.

By putting a Node with shop=hardware inside a Closed-Way with shop=hardware, you are basically saying that you have a hardware store contained within a hardware store, which is incorrect.  In reality, there is only one hardware store here.
Paul Cone (2015-06-04 22:51:36+00:00): As I said, I'm quite clear that I can convert polygons to points, but then how would you suggest I weed out the duplicates between the points derived from polygons and the points that orginally were points?
Peter Dobratz (2015-06-07 07:27:21+00:00): We shouldn't be adding duplicate data to the main OSM database on purpose.  The "polygon dataset" you speak of is not something that is native the OSM data model, but something that was derived from OSM data.  We shouldn't require duplicate data in the OSM database in order to help you weed out duplicate data in the dataset that you have derived from OSM data.  Your application should be able to consider OSM data as a whole (Nodes, Ways, Relations).  Is it worth posting this on an email list to get some more people to weigh in?
Paul Cone (2015-06-07 13:56:59+00:00): If the polygon dataset is not something that is native to the OSM dataset, then that makes my point -- there should be one dataset that accurately represents all types of that item, and in this case that would be the points.

My application already has its own ways because they are more accurate and reliable than the OSM ones.  Does the OSM community not appreciate that there could be use cases for its data where sometimes someone doesn't need the entire dataset?

I'm happy to discuss this on an email list.  I'm guessing you're more familiar with what list that could be so I'll leave it to you to post.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-07 14:10:23+00:00): Just spotted this discussion and thought that it was perhaps worth mentioning that osmconvert (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmconvert ) can easily extract centroids of OSM ways to make it easy to process.  There's no need (in fact in most cases it's actually confusing) to add details both to a way and a separate node in the middle.
Peter Dobratz (2015-06-08 02:17:23+00:00): I posted on my and there's some discussion there:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Peter%20Dobratz/diary/35170
SK53 (2015-06-08 09:16:34+00:00): See my recent blog post (http://sk53-osm.blogspot.com/2015/05/retail-outlets-on-openstreetmap.html) about creating a worldwide dataset of retail POIs as centroids using osmconvert. This demonstrates that there is absolutely NO NEED to have everything as nodes.

The addition of a duplicate node for the polygon, if repeated worldwide would seriously skew statistics & force complex processing to determine if a node exists in a similarly tagged polygon. 

This node should really be deleted.
Paul Cone (2015-06-08 17:24:16+00:00): It seems like a lot of work to just get a set of point which represent all hardware stores.  Maybe there is "NO NEED" to have them in the raw data but there certainly is a need for a simpler process.  I will probably just go buy data from InfoUSA rather than continue to argue this with OSM folks.
SK53 (2015-06-08 18:28:18+00:00): If you just want hardware stores use Overpass with the centroid output & you can have them all as JSON, Or even ask me & I can give you a list of hardware stores as centroids (Or you can purchase data from suppliers such as Geofabrik & OpenCageData). OSM is a vast shared database. If you try & make it work for your own personal needs you may break it for others needs. It is emphatically NOT in its raw form likely to be directly suitable for a given data consumer. The idea is that we provide the data & people build services on top of that for needs such as yours.
mebrau_UT (2020-12-13 20:42:05+00:00): Hello. Should this be tagged as a waterway=canal as it is man-made and most probably used for irrigation?
user_599436 (2015-05-19 11:01:54+00:00): Hi Iowa Kid,

You may find the highway=services and highway=rest_area tags appropriate for features you've mapped recently.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservices

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area
Iowa Kid (2015-05-20 05:41:00+00:00): Show me a sample
user_599436 (2015-05-20 11:09:04+00:00): Sure, here's one for highway=services https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193904383

and highway=rest_area
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223447993

Note that adding the area=yes tag is necessary if mapping the boundary.
5m4u9 (2015-05-19 09:06:45+00:00): Genial, gracias por añadir esta info. 
Acá cómo quedó -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3527187367

Mejoré la edición utilizando los datos de su página web. Falta horario de atención, código postal, correos, página en redes sociales, frecuencia, etc. 

De forma interesante, se podría registrar toda la red de emisoras que integran...

Si pueden también sería bueno, añadir otras oficinas, tiendas de barrio, negocios, etc. del barrio. Esta es la idea.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:37:37+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
naoliv (2015-05-22 12:33:34+00:00): tprmapas, o que você quis representar nessas sua edição?
naoliv (2015-05-22 12:33:30+00:00): tprmapas, o que você quis representar nessas sua edição?
mavl (2015-05-19 17:26:18+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Пишите, пожалуйста, комментарии к пакетам правок, особенно когда удаляете какие-либо объекты из OpenStreetMap.
Worshipper (2015-05-20 03:34:46+00:00): ок. постараюсь
maraf24 (2015-05-21 19:03:08+00:00): Pasy rowerowe wzdłuż Lnianej były otagowane ponad rok temu - w linii drogi. Nie rysujemy ich osobno gdy są na jezdni.
Maktronik (2015-05-24 19:11:49+00:00): Dzięki za radę będę się do niej stosował. Tylko, że w ogóle tego nie widać na normalnej mapie.
maraf24 (2015-05-24 21:46:45+00:00): Nie wiem co to jest normalna mapa, ale na mapie rowerowej pasy rowerowe widać.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-26 08:27:36+00:00): Skąd się wzięła Włosienica na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114146281/history ?

Czy to nie jest też "Droga Oswalda Balzera"?
ndmystko (2021-02-26 08:54:12+00:00): Wygląda na moją pomyłkę. Po 6 latach nie jestem w stanie odpowiedzieć ale nie mam żadnej lokalnej wiedzy z tamtego rejonu. Posługiwałem się ogólnodostępnymi danymi, do których i Ty masz dostęp. Popraw w/g własnej wiedzy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-26 09:53:56+00:00): Poprawiłem już bo według mojej wiedzy nie było poprawne - zapytałem się na wypadek gdybym coś przegapił.

Dzięki za odpowiedź!
Lepto (2015-05-19 08:25:11+00:00): building=barn ist nur für Schuppen/Scheunen die landwirtschaftlich genutzt werden gedacht. Habe nur eigene, falsch eingetragene Gebäude/Schuppen korrigiert.
Werde sie später nochmals genauer überprüfen.
literan (2015-05-19 11:00:25+00:00): Вообще-то правильно service=tyres. Поправил.
user_242798 (2016-12-08 11:30:25+00:00): Jaagpad langs de Hollandsche IJssel.
Was, history: footway, 90% correct.
Changed to path: OK, since no NL:G7 is available.
BUT: ALSO ADD [vehicle=no]. Missing implies [bicycle=yes] which is NOT correct! 
[access=permissive] means (Osmose!): access=yes|permissive allow all transport modes. Including car, horse, moped, hazmat and so on, unless explicitly excluded.
OSM Routing is damaged!
Also: [barrier=gate] should be connected to highway.
Jani Helin (2015-05-19 09:04:54+00:00): Added missing path digitizing from a GPS-track
mavl (2015-05-19 18:39:22+00:00): Магазина «Снежка» больше нет?
macspace (2015-05-20 15:31:13+00:00): Там теперь другой магазин. Не узнавал точно что там.
mavl (2015-05-20 17:22:31+00:00): Жаль. Хороший был магазин.
marc__marc (2020-05-06 09:55:56+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3464322519
what's the meaning of safety=for cylindric lock ?
you mean it's a bicycle_parking=stands that include a lock ? or the user bring their own lock as usual ?
Regards,
Marc
hanoj (2020-05-06 11:52:01+00:00): Hi, 
true, user bring their own lock as usual. more source:
http://www.velock.cz/cs/zamky-prislusenstvi/17-zamek-save.html
http://www.cyklistikakrnov.com/CykloKrnovsko/bezpecnostni-stojany-na-kola.html
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
gileri (2015-05-20 17:10:23+00:00): Bonjour,

Je viens de passer à côté de la pelouse de l'amphitéatre Gaston Berger, et les chemins que vous avez supprimé sont bien présent. Pouvez-vous m'éclairer sur vos modifications ?
Kris Anselmo (2015-05-20 18:03:46+00:00): Bonjour, 
En voulant corriger certains jonctions je me suis aperçu qu'il n'y avait pas de piste cyclable ni sur le cadastre ni sur l'imagerie aérienne. J'ai surement été un peu vite en besogne compte tenu de votre commentaire. J'ai fais un revert du coup.
gileri (2015-05-20 20:07:04+00:00): Pas de soucis. En effet c'est plutot récent comme modification, ça ne m'étonne pas que ça soit ni sur le cadastre ni sur Bing. Merci pour le revert !
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:16:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:17:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
lezurdis (2015-08-13 12:03:25+00:00): O motorway_link é para uma estrada que permite a saída de uma autoestrada :

- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link

Não é para desenhar as faixas dentro de uma portagem. Se queres indicar a quantidade de faixas podes usar o tag lanes :

- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes

Vou repor então a portagem no seu estado anterior.
mavl (2015-05-19 18:11:19+00:00): Это очень полезный пакет правок.
Спасибо!
GerdP (2015-10-15 07:32:30+00:00): please review:
the way now has the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;tertiary
GerdP (2015-10-20 09:34:33+00:00): I've changed it to 
highway=unclassified
geohacker (2015-05-26 05:42:05+00:00): Hello. None of these buildings look like how they are on the ground. Sorry, I'm deleting.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:14:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-08-07 17:40:54+00:00): Co z tym przejazdem? Nadal zamknięty?
Justyna | Yanosik (2015-08-12 09:48:37+00:00): otwarty już, zmianę dodałam