piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:21:57+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721913
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:19:51+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721870
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:21:03+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721890
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:20:27+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721870
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:16:42+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721812
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:15:50+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721796
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:14:19+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721772
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:13:20+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721759
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:12:12+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721737
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:11:04+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721726
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:09:03+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721695
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:07:26+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act:  113721666
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 08:03:57+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721397
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 07:49:56+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721397
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 07:47:39+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721368
Sosha1996 (2021-11-13 07:45:05+00:00): this is changeset reverting for vandal act: 113721324
Glassman (2021-11-02 18:19:35+00:00): #TIP: We spell out street names instead of using abbreviations. Reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113260379
IamAperson2 (2021-11-05 01:48:28+00:00): Thx for the info
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113260379
JJIglesias (2021-11-02 07:40:07+00:00): O el Camino tiene nombre propio: "Camino a Condominio Villa Linda", o NO tiene nombre alguno, un nombre "generico" como "Camino a Condominio" es vago y no adecuado
◪ Jarv (2021-11-02 15:24:39+00:00): You have put the ASLs before the traffic signals. This ought to be the other way around with the traffic signals put on the stop line & ASL put on the ASL and not the other way around.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113260427
Nathan_A_RF (2021-11-02 19:56:26+00:00): Are you sure this is the case? The wiki seems to indicate the opposite although that is the junction node being tagged with the traffic light. All vehicles including bicycles need to stop before the traffic light.
◪ Jarv (2021-11-02 21:16:21+00:00): Wiki says "... ideally level with the stop line at the front of the painted box."
I read that as put the ASL node at the ASL which is at the front of the [painted] box.
The diagram on the wiki shows the "highway=traffic_signals" node on the junction interchange node, which is acceptable, however placing "highway=traffic_signals" on the stop line with "direction=forward" or "backward" is still acceptable similar to what you have done.
Also everywhere I've seen ASL tagged, it has been beyond the highway=traffic_signals node
Nathan_A_RF (2021-11-02 21:23:29+00:00): Hmm well I'll switch them around if it's more consistent with other mapping but I still feel it's the wrong way around. It doesn't help that the wiki doesn't go into much detail with multiple nodes tagged as traffic signals.
Nikolai E (2021-11-02 01:19:44+00:00): 划分军事区原因：
“因为河水持续上涨，下中院村北侧山上的驻军打开营门，让村民及车辆进入营区避险。为了方便群众和救援车辆通行，军队还开放营区道路，让过往车辆绕行通过断点。”
——《新京报》2012年7月26日报道
https://www.bjnews.com.cn/news/2012/07/26/212688.html

驻军从卫星图观察似为油库或弹药库，具体性质和番号待考。
Glassman (2021-11-02 18:28:39+00:00): I added the building and drive through lanes. Feel free to modify if I got anything wrong. The imagery wasn't that great.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113260599
ovruni (2021-11-02 05:40:52+00:00): Hola Fer25, he cambiado los valores de operator que estaban en mayúscula, ya que en OSM usamos la capitalización mixta (primera letra de la palabra en mayúscula y las otras en minúscula) que es lo que se aconseja en la wiki. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may.C3.BAsculas
Fer25 (2021-11-02 14:01:56+00:00): Una pregunta, en la Avenida Tacna, en sentido hacia el Rimac, ya no hay esa separación , ahora es una sola via de 3 carriles ( en el otro sentido si se mantiene). En ese caso solo hay que eliminar la via?
ovruni (2021-11-02 20:29:10+00:00): Hola, creo que te refieres a la vía que dice "Carril Tacna" en sentido hacia el Rímac. Si la vía se ha ampliado a mas carriles y ya no hay una separación física entonces se puede eliminar, pero hay que tener en cuenta si el segmento que se va a eliminar forma parte de alguna relación como pueden ser las rutas de transporte, entonces se debe de agregar el segmento de "Avenida Tacna" a la relación de la ruta.
Saludos
MxxCon (2021-11-02 02:59:56+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on your edit?
All the translations I was able to see on both Wikipedia and Wikidata use "политен", not "политан".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113260688
Glassman (2021-11-02 18:30:59+00:00): Though I used to live in the area, I haven't in some time. If the trail is closed and likely not to be rebuilt you can just delete it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113260747
Glassman (2021-11-02 18:33:11+00:00): To delete just open the editor, select the path then right-click and select the delete icon. Save and upload and the path is gone.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113260747
ovruni (2021-11-02 05:17:17+00:00): Hola Nelson Qiu, gracias por contribuir a OSM. En este conjunto de cambios, como en el 113227691 han movido nodos de vías varios metros, de tal forma que se habían creado cruces de vías, los cuales ya he corregido. Por ahora he restaurado las posiciones de estos nodos, por favor revisar si no hay nodos arrastrados antes de subir los datos.
Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
Nelson Qiu (2021-11-02 05:51:13+00:00): Hi Ovruni, thanks for reaching out and thank you for your correction!
tonalf (2022-10-09 14:11:23+00:00): Hi, supposedly there's a kiosk here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1822382148

but last year's street view imagery doesn't show anything I'd call a kiosk:
https://kartaview.org/details/4539833/6080/track-info

Is this a mistake?
archpdx (2021-11-02 02:55:47+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding these buildings. Quick tip - when adding buildings press `q` while selecting to square the corners. You can also hold down shift while clicking to select multiple features. If you need any further help feel free to respond to this comment.

Thanks,
archpdx
ovruni (2021-11-02 05:05:48+00:00): Hola ChristinaLL, le he escrito anteriormente y en las ultimas veces no he recibido respuesta de su parte. En este conjunto de cambios veo que ha agregado accesos en las calles Las Alheñas y los Perlitres, sin embargo estas calles no tienen cobertura en Mapillary.
Saludos
Supaplex (2021-11-02 07:04:37+00:00): 操場並不是建築噢，你用錯標籤了
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113261993
Supaplex (2021-11-02 16:14:19+00:00): not a office, just a bus stop
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113262115
Vengadormascado (2021-11-03 01:53:05+00:00): Right, sorry for that!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113262115
abakus_uploader (2021-11-02 23:32:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Cambroulet (2021-11-03 22:10:35+00:00): Naprawiłem. Dodałem te dane. Dzięki.
Cambroulet (2021-11-03 22:18:59+00:00): Naprawiłem. Thank you.
CoyKoi (2021-11-02 21:04:22+00:00): Nice work. A tip regarding the satellite view: in the editor you can switch between different imagery sources. In the Backgrounds section on the right of the screen, there are several options. The default is "LINZ NZ Aerial" - which in Auckland dates to around 2017. A much more recent imagery source (2021) is "Maxar Premium Imagery" - but you'll notice it is lower resolution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113264103
archpdx (2021-11-02 19:47:39+00:00): Why did you remove the building?
I've reverted this change in changeset 113299828
olo81 (2021-11-03 17:09:16+00:00): Dodawanie miasta do nazw szkół jest nadmiarowe. Nazwa opisowa!
Położenie konkretnej szkoły jest umiejscowione w granicach miasta i można to wyczytać z mapy. 
W większych miastach polski można sobie zobaczyć że nie ma dopisanych miast.
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2021-11-03 20:50:54+00:00): Ja tylko jeszcze dodam, że w członie Podstawowa wciąż brakuje literki a
olo81 (2021-11-03 21:17:35+00:00): poprawione
maraf24 (2021-11-03 21:45:39+00:00): Wiele szkół ma nazwę miejscowości w swojej oficjalnej nazwie.
Jednakże w przypadku miast nie ma zwyczaju zachowywania takiej nazwy w name, bo mieszkańcy miasta nie muszą co chwilę podkreślać, gdzie się znajdują :P
C2oc4 (2021-11-07 07:19:37+00:00): Witam wszystkich :) sugerowałem się nazwami jakie widnieją w Będzinie a mianowicie: Szkoła Podstawowa nr 1 w Będzinie itp stąd owe zmiany stosowałem do innych odpowiedników

oto link: https://sp1.bedzin.edu.pl/ 

nie mam w zamiaru wprowadzać ludzi w błąd czy coś ale tak się sugeruję
watmildon (2026-01-30 01:04:54+00:00): This appears to have a typo in seamark:light:character where you have swapped in a capital letter I for the lower case L in "Fl" for "flash". I have changed them all to the F L value but let me know if you meant something else!
la4de (2026-01-30 18:57:18+00:00): Good catch. It was supposed to be Flash -> Fl (lower case L). Thanks for fixing
watmildon (2026-02-01 03:06:59+00:00): They look nice on my silly render: https://watmildon.github.io/lighthouse-map-libre

Thanks for adding them!
Sosha1996 (2021-12-12 09:31:09+00:00): درود.


توی سایت شهرداری تهران همچنان نام این معبر آفتاب هست.
سوالی که الان برای من پیش اومده اینه که واقعا اسم این معبر عوض شده یا این که شما به گزارش کاربران اکتفا کردید؟
🅢🅐🅜🅐🅝➤ (2021-12-12 10:42:37+00:00): سلام
بله، برای تغییر نام خیابان علاوه بر دریافت گزارش از کاربران، اخبار سایت های مرتبط نیز بررسی شده است

http://shoratehran.ir/news/%D8%A2%D8%B1%D8%B4%DB%8C%D9%88+%D8%A7%D8%B7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B9+%D8%B1%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C/22031/%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%DA%AF%D8%B0%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C+%D8%AE%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C+%D8%A8%D9%87+%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85+%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AF+%D9%85%D9%86%D9%88%DA%86%D9%87%D8%B1+%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%AF%D9%87+%D9%88+%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AF%DB%8C+%D8%A7%D8%B2+%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86+%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%DB%8C+%D9%88+%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%AA%DB%8C%D8%AF+%D8%B2%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA+%D9%85%D8%AD%DB%8C%D8%B7%DB%8C+%DA%A9%D8%B4%D9%88%D8%B1

https://www.iribnews.ir/fa/news/3170476/%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85%DA%AF%D8%B0%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%AC%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D8%B4%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%A7-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D9%86%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%87%D9%86%DA%AF%DB%8C-%D9%88-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%85%D8%AD%DB%8C%D8%B7-%D8%B2%DB%8C%D8%B3%D8%AA
Sosha1996 (2021-12-12 12:29:16+00:00): خیلی ممنونم.
دست شما درد نکنه.
BudgieInWA (2021-11-16 04:33:01+00:00): Nice additions!

I spotted that you accidentally moved the war memorial https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7108686714 half way across the suburb.

Also, you can press Q (the "Square" tool) to square the edges of buildings or a group bunch of buildings, or to make a corner square.

I like seeing your updates across Subi!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113265941
JJIglesias (2021-11-02 06:45:18+00:00): Could you please point out where in the Wiki says that the River area or Riverbank could Not have a Name, like the main course. I could Not find anywhere that said so, thus removig the name in the river area is NOT an standard and should be left as it was. Thanks.
Kehaml (2021-11-03 06:12:26+00:00): Dziękuję za informacje. Większość wprowadziłem.
pio2_122 (2021-11-04 18:34:12+00:00): Dzięki za poprawki :)
Kehaml (2021-11-05 16:13:23+00:00): Dzięki również za Twoją dotychczasową nieocenioną pomoc jak i poświęcony czas. Trzymaj się :)
vulasala (2021-11-03 05:27:59+00:00): Hi cheng15225,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 998321237, way 998321238
and way 998321239 from living street to residential, as the area is residential.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113266776
Shaun das Schaf (2021-11-04 10:21:57+00:00): Hello Diana,

can you please explain what the reason for this change was? It looks to me like you split this track for no apparent reason. Both the old part and the new part of the track have exactly the same tags.

Thank you and best regards
Shaun das Schaf
DianaDemchuk (2021-11-04 11:05:35+00:00): Greetings! On this road there was a pulled knot and a duplicate, I cut it to make the correct geometry. Tags have not changed. More visual information about this section can be seen in the OSM History Viewer https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/917324622
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-14 04:51:02+00:00): Hi AA Farm. Your edit looks awesome, but I need you to improve water body (id 998323020) due crossing with building. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142906559). Thank you.
mappinglander (2021-11-02 16:06:10+00:00): Merhabalar,
internete göre tam o konumda bir havaalanı var, ancak görünüşe bakılırsa sadece planör benzeri küçük hava araçları kalkıyor. Ayrıca pistin toprak olması da havalimanı olmamasına engel değil. Şurası (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aeroways) da aynı şeyi söylüyor. yine de verilerin bazılarının doğruluğu kuşkulu (mesela hangar veya herhangi bir park alanı gözükmüyor)
vulasala (2021-11-03 05:21:17+00:00): Hi cheng15225,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 998327551 from living street to residential, as the area is residential area.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113268436
cytryn (2021-11-02 08:36:17+00:00): I believe the maxspeed value supposed to be 60, right?
4004 (2021-11-02 23:31:47+00:00): Yep, you are of course correct
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
user_5359 (2021-11-02 08:34:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add an area without any known OSM key: This isn't a building!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-11-05 12:29:44+00:00): 尊敬的LeonGo
您好
您可能觉得双向道路都有标注道路名称是一种“错误的显示”，但显示数据不能作为道路缺失名字的理由。这条道路事实上是存在名字的，那数据就应当准确的反映出道路的名称。
渲染问题应找OSM-Carto的渲染团队谈，而不是破坏道路数据。若您用基于OSM的导航软件，经过这些路段时将再也显示不出正确的名字，而是“无名路”之类，因为数据是缺失的。并非所有用户都是通过渲染来了解地图。

按照OSM的准则，您应当避免为渲染而标注： https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

望您能尽快将删除的道路名称添加，感谢合作。

------
快乐的老鼠宝宝
自豪的代表 OSMChina DT 敬上
LeonGo (2021-11-05 14:40:20+00:00): 收到！
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-16 13:36:49+00:00): Hi, there is incorrect turn restriction at this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/330045084
it doesn't have from and to members. Is there a restriction for a right turn there and it should be fixed or can we delete this broken restriction?
tkardi (2023-06-17 08:37:53+00:00): Hey, no there's no right turn restriction there. It might be an artefact from the time the junction was under reconstruction. In any case, it can be deleted.
Mordechai23 (2022-02-08 12:53:06+00:00): od kiedy tu jest strefa?
marnow (2022-02-08 12:57:03+00:00): nie pamiętam dokładnie, ale od bardzo dawna (znaki strefy są widoczne już na google streetview z 2017 ...)
Mordechai23 (2022-02-08 13:58:08+00:00): dobra git, poprawiłem maxspeed bo chyba przez przypadek usunąłeś ;)
Warin61 (2022-04-16 00:12:07+00:00): Hi,
The building with club=sport... 

A sports club will have 
a name (tag name=?)
a sport (tag sport=?)

The building may contain only that club .. but the name of the building, if it has one, may not be the same as the club. I would simply map the club as a single node within the building. 

--------------
Keep mapping...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
GOwin (2021-11-03 01:05:58+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, @DRRMO Aries! Thank you for updating these features in your neighbourhood.

We're keen to know more about your interest, or how we can work together improving OpenStreetMap in your municipality, especially for DRR programs.

Check out the channels where the local community of OSM volunteers interact, and where you can ask questions, if you have any: https://osm.org/wiki/PH
Carto'Cité (2021-11-29 17:23:05+00:00): Bonjour à nouveau,
Merci pour cette mise à jour des pistes cyclables. Intéressant cette suppression de piste ; j'imagine que tu dois être du coin et que tu l'as observée. Je me suis à nouveau permis de connecter la piste ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9293992910 plutôt que de la laisser déconnectée. N'hésite pas à me dire si tu as un commentaire.
À bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Romy G (2021-11-30 10:48:47+00:00): Bonjour Charles,
C'est en effet un aménagement cyclable qui n'est plus utilisable (nouvelles constructions créant discontinuités, effacement du marquage sur trottoir, divers obstacles).
Merci pour la connexion et la correction.
Romain
Carto'Cité (2021-11-30 12:49:41+00:00): Salut Romain,
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris le temps de me répondre :)
Je t'envoie pas mal de messages, j'espère ne pas te déranger. Si tu as besoin d'aide pour contribuer sur la thématique vélo, n'hésite pas à me demander.
Charles
aceman444 (2026-05-25 17:10:18+00:00): Hi, what is the reason for changing the road classification?
It seems there is a schema for this road 11 in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113255131 where all these interconnecting roads are trunk_link and you randomly change one of them to primary? What is the reason and your concept for mapping this road 11 along its length?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
PT-53 (2021-11-02 13:02:32+00:00): Hallo Vika_Nosovich,
bitte nicht Blind Knoten löschen.
Richtig wäre gewesen, diesen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1949331319/history
an die korrekte Position zu verschieben!.
Grüße
Vika_Nosovich (2021-11-03 07:11:32+00:00): Hello PT-53!

Thank you for your comment. I noticed my edit and took note of your comment.

Best regards!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ivanbranco (2021-12-19 08:46:55+00:00): Hi Ethan,

you created two new tags, Floor height=* and floor hieght=*

There are some problems, in the first tag you used a capital letter, in the second tag there's a typo "hieght", in both tags there's a blank space. Usally OSM tags are in lower case letters and without blank space (usually using "_").

You could fix them with "levels:height", what you think?
user_5359 (2022-01-09 18:24:42+00:00): @ivanbranco: Any private reaction from  Ethan Woudstra? If not, I would suggest that we change it.
ivanbranco (2022-01-09 19:36:27+00:00): No response,
impiaaa (2021-11-03 15:05:36+00:00): Are you sure about this address change? This office is not near South First Street. Also, "addr:street" is supposed to exactly match the name of the street in OSM, with no abbreviations.
mueschel (2021-11-06 14:42:40+00:00): Hi,
here are three ways with a strange tag like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/744839170

I guess something went wrong with the name tag, could you check that?