piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
murr999888 (2020-03-12 21:58:43+00:00): http://mkadastr.mariupolrada.gov.ua/cform/Mariupol_street_vocabulary.htm
Четко обозначено, что у улиц разные названия.
Ars-UA (2020-03-13 05:48:52+00:00): Этот документ содержит ошибки, (навскидку могу вспомнить укр. Осипенко/Осипенка). В спорных ситуациях мы выясняем по месту. Кленовая - как раз спорное название, я его лично уточнял.
murr999888 (2020-03-13 06:36:35+00:00): Кадастр, гугль и горсовет 
http://mariupolnews.com.ua/news/view/v-mariupole-proizoshlo-avarijnoe-otklyuchenie-e-lektroe-nergii-1 
считают эту улицу Клиновой.

Есть какие-то ссылки на официальные подтверждения того, что список ошибочный, в него позднее вносились изменения или где-то есть перечень "истинных" названий?

Если на доме висит табличка "Кленовая", то возможно, что ее просто с 2016 года не поменяли. И то, что местные называют ее по-привычке "Кленовой" собственно ничего не значит. От того, что пр. Мира большая часть жителей по-прежнему называет "Ленина" и есть масса табличек со старым названием, проспект тем не перестает быть "Мира".
Ars-UA (2020-03-13 09:37:33+00:00): Гугл - это вообще не карты, там ошибка на ошибке (по крайней мере, в Мариуполе). По этой улице уже было обсуждение. Спорные ситуации решаются по месту, предлагаю Вам посетить эту улицу лично и удостовериться в моей правоте (или опровергнуть её).
Ars-UA (2020-03-13 09:38:47+00:00): Кстати, по Вашей ссылке http://mariupolnews.com.ua/news/view/v-mariupole-proizoshlo-avarijnoe-otklyuchenie-e-lektroe-nergii-1 "Кленовая Балка улица" - это она.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-03-14 11:16:39+00:00): Thanks for changing!
Frans S (2020-04-14 15:49:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A request
Please map buildings separate ( 1 by1) and don't collect them as 1 building.
Please square also your buildings with the Q key in IDeditor
Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-15 12:14:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82215411 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in France.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3564 for more information.
Warin61 (2020-03-13 06:30:53+00:00): Please make comments on your changesets!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

This changeset broke an admin boundary

What were you doing?
Repaired boundaries for NSW, Vic, + London Mallee
Warin61 (2020-03-14 23:12:52+00:00): Читать 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

Этот набор изменений также сломал внешние пути для часового пояса NSW.
Warin61 (2020-05-17 04:51:12+00:00): Reverted.
bingo (2020-03-13 15:32:39+00:00): Hallo bema,
die beiden Gebäude Am Flügelbahnhof 22 und 24 habe ich zu einer Relation zusammengefasst und der Relation den Namen Lucas-Cranach Seniorenwohnhaus gegeben und mit amenity=social_facility und social_facility=nursing_home sowie den Operator getaggt. Hier liegt nun eine Redundanz vor!
bema (2020-03-16 10:14:08+00:00): gut, ist besser so.
arcanma (2020-03-14 18:54:13+00:00): Reviewed. Good
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-13 06:49:10+00:00): #Vandalism
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-13 07:21:45+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82147837
arcanma (2020-03-14 18:52:36+00:00): Reviewed. Risolto incrocio del fosso aggiunto con strada asfaltata. Incrocio con strada sterrata non visibile da foto aeree, da risolvere
eggie (2020-03-12 19:42:29+00:00): Dag Jstrorma... Kwaad kan het niet, maar foot=yes is al default op een fietspad in nederland. Het zou dus gewoon moeten routeren. 
MVG,
Eggie
arcanma (2020-03-14 18:36:33+00:00): Reviewed. Added tunnel on highway crossing
arcanma (2020-03-14 18:21:54+00:00): Reviewed good.
Imaginashun (2020-03-12 23:36:27+00:00): Correction: Source was Maxar Premium Imagery
arcanma (2020-03-14 18:17:08+00:00): Reviewed. Corretto il valore di craft in craft=joiner (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:craft%3Djoiner)
mariotomo (2020-03-12 22:31:38+00:00): hola.  gracias por mejorar el mapa.  por favor considera lo presentado en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
user_5359 (2020-03-13 08:04:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the meaning of the keys.
We also use mixcased characters for the name values
user_5359 (2020-03-13 07:57:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
eggie (2020-03-12 21:13:18+00:00): Jann.. Probeer zo min mogelijk te schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Op het moment dat je gaat schuiven en je hebt toevallig een node geselecteerd ga je die onbedoeld verplaatsen met als gevolge dat alles dat daar aan vastzit meekomt. met dit als resultaat.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=82129211
Verder heeft editor iD de vervelende neiging om zaken overal aan vast te plakken.
Het lijkt me beter dat als jullie dit professioneel willen aanpaklken dat je overschakelt naar een volwassen editor als JOSM. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-03-12 21:15:51+00:00): Wat ik bedoel is dat die bollards nu heel ergens anders staan en dat zal niet de bedoeling zijn.
Ik zal wat losmaken.
eggie (2020-03-12 21:32:57+00:00): Bollards liggen weer los van gebouwen en  op hun plek. 
In editor JOSM schuif je met de rechtermuisknop en niet met de knop waar je ook mee selecteert. In iD schuif je met de linker muisknop, maar maak je ook je selecties. dat zie ik regelmatig fout gaan.
camelCaseNick (2020-03-15 06:49:31+00:00): Du hast hier ein Review beantragt.
Diese Relation ist nach dem 2007 Proposal, das nicht mehr verwendet wird. (Nicht zu verwechseln mit der aktuellen Nutzung von type=building)
i_am_a_burger (2020-03-15 08:11:35+00:00): Na ja, "beantragt", aber ich danke dir!

Leider kann ich da jetzt gar nicht wirklich was zu sagen, weil alles, was ich grundsätzlich gerade denke, nur dazu führt, dass mir jemand sagt, solche Dinge dürfen/sollen nicht in den Notes diskutiert werden.
VA00 (2020-03-13 13:24:28+00:00): Zasadniczo ścieżki od rury do asfaltu nie ma, ale las jest na tyle przetrzebiony, że da się przejść bez problemu. Ale trzeba dać trail_visibilty=none.
pan_borsuk (2020-03-13 14:58:46+00:00): idąc od strony rury w strone powstańców początek jest dość wyraźny, lecz później następuje drama.. 

tzeczywiście lepiej takie odcinki które dopiero powstają oznaczać visibility=none

sytuacja jest rozwojowa. bede tam dłubał aż sie przebije do ulicy 😎

ale pp drugiej stronie chechła przyznasz że visibility sie poprawia :-P
VA00 (2020-03-14 06:50:22+00:00): Po drugiej stronie elegancko. Podpiąłem do Borowcowej, aczkolwiek z powodu rury żadna nawigacja tam nie pokieruje - i dobrze. Nie trawię tylko nowej maszyny do mielenia krzaków, którą stosuje zakład energetyczny pod linią wysokiego napięcia. Lepiej po tym nie chodzić, zdarzyło mi się już przebić podeszwę buta...
pan_borsuk (2020-03-14 20:09:02+00:00): o widzisz! nie wiedziałem co w tej szerokiej przecince wstawić i dałem..łąkę :-D. poręba brzmi super!

a nie dało by się uwidocznić na mapie tej rury a zarazem by nie była brana pod uwage przy wyznaczaniu trasy ?

dzieki
VA00 (2020-03-15 06:36:12+00:00): Tam raczej pasuje scrub, bo po takim mieleniu krzaki odrastają w pół roku.
pan_borsuk (2020-03-15 11:07:35+00:00): trzeba będzie zatem roztoczyć opieką.. 🪓😎
wireguy (2020-03-12 22:29:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM Mavislayer! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.  Also, name should not be 'house'.  I have made the corrections.  Take a look, and add another!
Glassman (2020-03-21 22:53:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82129683
user_5359 (2020-03-13 07:55:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
I-76 (2023-06-09 14:40:15+00:00): NO abbreviations (see private rd.)
VA00 (2020-03-13 13:18:47+00:00): To kiedyś była przecinka przeciwpożarowa
pan_borsuk (2020-03-14 20:14:42+00:00): o widzisz! super ścieżka do biegania jak i pod mtb. dopracuje ją next time

zawsze myślałem że jakby klasyfikuje przeznaczenie tej ścieżki oznaczanie dla kogo.. a tu jakieś szersze pojęcie jest. postaram sie tego typu ściezki oznaczać bez tego "selekcjonowania" dla kogo jest przeznaczona.
pan_borsuk (2020-03-14 20:15:43+00:00): o! widzisz..

i dodałeś ten łącznik od Metalowców :-)
VA00 (2020-03-15 07:52:31+00:00): Ja tam wolę chodzić po torach...
pan_borsuk (2020-03-15 11:09:44+00:00): tory romantiko 😍
ale ta ścieżka idealna nawet na Sivensa.

ps. patrze na geoportal mapy topo i nieźle kopalnia zeżarła terenu od tamtego czasu..
ciekawe gdzie maja wyznaczone maxymalne granice wyrobiska
user_5359 (2020-03-13 07:56:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. 
You have also copy the value direktly to the name. Please correct this!!
Reeniz (2020-03-12 22:48:03+00:00): Hola, porque etiqueto los Heliostatos como generadores siendo que estos no los son?
DressyPear4 (2020-03-12 23:21:46+00:00): Assim eles ficam visíveis no OSMCarto, mas se estiver errado eu corrijo.
Reeniz (2020-03-12 23:28:00+00:00): No mapear para el render
angys (2020-03-18 21:23:20+00:00): hello, please adjust your edit around Bnadar Perda as your edits are not adjust to true offset and GPS. Thank You. Esri (2, 0.75 offset) Maxar (-3, 5)
ProfessorLupin (2020-03-23 20:09:47+00:00): We use the Imagery Offset DB plugin to get appropriate offsets in areas we edit. We did not see those particular offsets while editing, and they are not currently visible. You can upload your ideal offsets to the imagery offset DB.
Michele Boscolo Z (2020-03-12 21:23:45+00:00): ok vero.
user_9838430 (2020-03-13 01:56:51+00:00): Hello,

The Wilaya Djanet is an independent wilaya since 2019-12-18 / 1441-04-21. It is no longer part of the wilaya of Illizi. Please make it correct again.

Link to the governmental decree:
https://www.joradp.dz/FTP/JO-ARABE/2019/A2019078.pdf (Arabic legal text)

Link to the press article:
http://www.aps.dz/en/algeria/32006-10-administrative-districts-promoted-into-provinces-with-full-prerogatives (English translation)

With best regards.
dromedar61 (2020-03-13 08:26:07+00:00): Hello,
thanks for your instant information and sorry for my mistake.
I referred to wikipedia, where the area map of Illizi Province is still unchanged (Djanet included) in AR FR, DE, EN language versions.
I will correct the OSM data within the next days.

Are you able to fix Illizi and Djanet Province in in AR and/or FR Wikipedia ?

Bye, Dromedar61
user_9838430 (2020-03-13 13:36:19+00:00): Hello,

thank you for your quick response. Yes, the maps in Wikipedia and many maps all over the internet are still unchanged, because of this, it is not so easy the find that changes, so I can understand you. The image editing in Wikimedia is not my area, I will leave it to the experts there.

With best regards.
dromedar61 (2020-03-14 22:15:10+00:00): Done!
freeExec (2020-03-18 06:24:24+00:00): Название - это только название, никаких типов объекта там быть не должно. То что это салон обозначается тегами.
eggie (2020-03-12 22:24:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-12 22:27:32+00:00): Beste Salverda.. Waarom heet het straatgedeelte ter hoogte van Westerse Kamp nu nog Grote Kamp in OSM. Wellicht ook nog aanpassen?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-12 22:31:10+00:00): Aan de kant van de Hesselinghstraat zit ook nog een stukje Buitenkamp? 
wellicht ook foutief?
hoserab (2020-03-13 18:26:22+00:00): Is there really a warehouse building here?
_carlee (2020-03-13 19:05:08+00:00): It is municipal building. A 'storage garage' technically.
hoserab (2020-03-14 03:59:26+00:00): There are a few small buildings already on the map; you've added a warehouse building on top of them, that covers the entirety of the property. What I'm really getting at is: is there really a warehouse BUILDING—storage garage, whatever you want to call it—that covers the ***entirety of the parcel***?

The Bing Maps satellite photo doesn't show this. Esri satellite photo doesn't show this. Google Maps satellite photo doesn't show this. City of Calgary aerial photos don't show this. City of Chestermere photos at https://app.munisight.com/CityofChestermere/Content/Site/MainPage.aspx?siteId=1 don't show this.

I don't frequent Chestermere very often but I have friends who live there, and I take a right from eastbound Chestermere Blvd to southbound Rainbow Rd to get to their house, and I personally don't recall there being a giant warehouse building at that intersection.

I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I'm wondering if you really meant to tag this with a landuse; as a storage YARD, not a storage BUILDING.
PT-53 (2020-03-14 06:34:42+00:00): Hallo UliFR,
nach Deinen Änderungen wird im OSM-Inspector für diese Fläche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377184977
ein Hinweis "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=7.83155&lat=48.00945&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
UliFR (2020-03-14 19:39:37+00:00): Stimmt, das ging auf meine Kappe. Danke für den Hinweis, ist korrigiert. Die Definition dieser Fläche als "Driveway" scheint mir allerdings ohnehin nicht sehr sinnig, oder?
PT-53 (2020-03-15 06:20:43+00:00): Ja, das sehe ich auch so.
Grüße
szydzio (2020-04-11 13:24:38+00:00): Plac pisane z dużej litery było jak najbardziej prawidłowe, patrz => https://mostrowmazowiecka.e-mapa.net?userview=32. Nazwę przywróciłem.
joeybab3 (2020-03-28 05:53:14+00:00): FYI there are buildings here, those paths have not been traversable for some time now. The reason that iD warns you about the paths crossing is because the paths are crossing. Marking them as level -1 should only be done if it is indeed below the ground level.
christiandflores (2020-03-28 06:22:03+00:00): Stop deleting data just because you disagree that it's "traversable". You're not even using the most up to date satellite imagery. Some people actually like having the option of a hiking shortcut through rough terrain. Use it or lose it is the whole point of openstreet. You don't touch my stuff and i won't touch yours.
joeybab3 (2020-03-28 17:45:31+00:00): I think you misunderstood what I was saying... these paths don’t exist, you can see the building outlines that you drew over right? There is a pods storage facility that paved over this area, I’m not saying that it’s hard to get to or something and that’s why the paths shouldn’t be there, I’m literally saying it does not exist anymore.
user_5359 (2020-03-13 07:53:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the meaning of the keys (LRV and the tags from https://www.osm.org/node/7289792881). Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4038568909? It seems to be the same object!
Reitstoen (2020-03-13 09:39:44+00:00): Hi!
Sorry, forgot to remove some tags from import files. Those regarding airport/helipad.
They were not suppose to be added.
I'll fix :)
Also gonna look into the LRV-tag. From what i can see it's the low water elevation for lakes/reservoir.
Stereo (2020-03-13 00:22:06+00:00): Ah, virdru war et am CACLR "Imp. Av. Lucien Salentiny". Wees net, wat si sech do geduecht haten :)
dmlu (2020-03-13 00:26:59+00:00): Hunn ech mer geduecht! Et ass scho praktesch, anstänneg changeset comments ze hunn :)
Branko Kokanovic (2020-03-17 21:25:11+00:00): Molim te, mozes li da se trudis da ne "lepis" administrativne granice za puteve? Ovde si spojio node #7289795052 izmedju puta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692238679 i granice https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703839438. Bas se mucimo da ispeglamo granice (ima tema na forumu), a ovo dosta odmaze (posto onda bilo kakvo pomeranje je mnogo pipavo)

Izvini, ali moram da kazem kad primetim ovo
LakatosVL (2020-03-18 16:59:44+00:00): Pozdrav Branko,
prilikom dodavanja lokalnih poljskih puteva nehotice sam zalepio put za granicu, istražio sam temu na forumu i hteo bih da pohvalim vaš rad i napor. Hvala puno na ukazanom previdu. Ispravljeno :-)
S poštovanjem Vlada.
eggie (2020-03-13 08:00:03+00:00): Top!
marc__marc (2021-03-12 12:06:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7289851685
it's an embassy ? witch country ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:diplomatic=embassy
Regards,
Marc
Allison P (2020-03-13 15:04:22+00:00): Seems like a good call.
user_5359 (2020-03-13 04:56:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building! And check also the opening_hours value (open only day per week?).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-15 14:33:35+00:00): Not sure how it happened, but this changeset introduced https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7289818857/history to the world as well (I've since deleted it).
Best Regards,
Andy
woodpeck (2020-06-09 11:24:16+00:00): Please fix the name of node 7137672118. It is certainly not a construction site called "DEMOLISHED". If the construction site has a name, add that; if it has no name, delete the name tag.
user_8334278 (2020-06-09 12:26:39+00:00): yes your right but if they look at the satellite view there is something there so putting demolished on top of the view seamed appropriate .
Jose Luis Infante (2020-03-13 01:23:43+00:00): Please, review this changeset. You change one isolated dwelling and now there are two with the same name. Landuse=retail?

And please, reuse the nodes ir order to maintain the element's history.

Thx!
Jose Luis Infante (2020-03-13 13:48:17+00:00): Reviewed!
acet2ngaia (2020-03-17 13:00:24+00:00): Hi! I noticed recently that the section of the Susquehanna River between Sunbury and the Conowingo dam (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/53084) doesn't render as blue anymore on the map. I'm not very good with relations, so I'm not completely sure what happened or how to fix it. 

I opened the relation in JOSM (which I'm not very experienced with) and it complained that the multipolygon wasn't closed and pointed at this area of the map. Do you know how to fix this?
dmgroom_ct (2020-03-17 16:26:55+00:00): I believe I have fixed this
acet2ngaia (2020-03-18 09:17:48+00:00): Thank you!
DaveF (2020-04-01 21:09:56+00:00): Hi
What do the public_transport=platform tags represent of the two ways?
MacLondon (2020-04-03 21:34:43+00:00): These were added inadvertently to roads when adding the tag to bus stops in a bus route. I've now removed this tagging from the roads.
Carnildo (2020-03-13 08:00:40+00:00): Did you use the wrong signal preset here?
Natfoot (2020-03-14 04:01:16+00:00): Could you be more specific. This area is CTC
Carnildo (2020-03-14 06:39:08+00:00): You appear to have used the highway traffic signals preset for a railway signal at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7290148178
Natfoot (2020-03-14 23:36:52+00:00): Thanks for catching that.
Natfoot (2020-03-14 23:37:08+00:00): It is fixed now.
MKnight (2020-08-20 10:08:29+00:00): Moin,
Du hast in Lucka (nicht nur in diesem CS) maxspeed=10 an living_streets angefügt. 
Das ist nicht korrekt, da living_street kein explizites maxspeed in Zahlen hat.
Da Du offenbar Ortskenntnis hast, kannst Du das korrigieren?

Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
CloCkWeRX (2020-03-13 05:32:00+00:00): Nice work! I might do a pass over the buildings you've done for solar
Fizzie-DWG (2020-03-13 05:49:44+00:00): Thanks! There were quite a few with solar, but I wasn't worrying about that, just the buildings themselves, water tanks, reservoirs & other things that caught my eye at the time!
camelCaseNick (2020-03-13 03:37:59+00:00): Hey,
what are your sources that the bridge is no more part of the NRHP as heritage? And what are the problems with the Wikipedia and Wikidata tags?
CamelCaseNick
25or6to4 (2020-03-13 22:24:58+00:00): According to Bridgehunter.com and my research, the bridge was replaced in 1990 or so. Thus the current birdge there is not historic anymore. I removed the Wiki links, since the Wiki refers to the actual historic bridge, not the bridge currently there.
camelCaseNick (2020-03-13 22:37:24+00:00): Okay, Thanks!
I just saw the Wikipedia article was written in present. 🤷‍♂️
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-26 04:37:05+00:00): You used some incline=up/down tags - do you remember what you wanted to express with it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732801753/history
mtbboy1993 (2022-09-26 05:46:09+00:00): I was referring to the direction of the stairs. these are intended for both directions. This is explained here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-13 07:08:55+00:00): note that this page wanted to express "incline=up or incline=down" not to describe single tag with such value
DiogoBaptista98 (2020-04-08 22:40:42+00:00): não será melhor apagar as vias?cumprimentos
topolusitania (2020-04-09 15:00:32+00:00): Bom dia. Não sei o estado actual (9Abril) das obras. O levantamento do prolongamento  Av dos Combatentes - Av A A Aguiar já está operacional ? Obviamente que podes alterar e reflectir o que já está operacional. Os prolongamentos estão desenhados como "projectos". Cumprimentos
xmd5a (2020-03-13 07:35:05+00:00): Добрый день. Названия улиц указываются полностью https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Sowa1980 (2021-02-13 18:20:17+00:00): Привет, а что это такое, что это делает в адресе?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/780751419/history
aharvey (2020-03-13 09:40:52+00:00): Form the imagery Wiggins Reserve and Austin Reserve just look like leisure=park https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park and not leisure=nature_reserve https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=nature%20reserve. Because they are public parks kids go to to play, they aren't there to preserve wildlife or flora from the looks of it.
aharvey (2020-03-14 22:44:25+00:00): I've changed these to leisure=park in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82139260
Timmy_Tesseract (2020-03-21 02:15:53+00:00): This changeset ist full of fictional objects (tertiary type balo rd, spice bridge, landuse farmland, etc.) as well as tagging errors (waterway segments tagged as highways, road name abbreviations, etc.). Are you aware that edits like this are harming the effort of countless volunteers who are working together to create an accurate map of the world?
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-03-27 08:46:04+00:00): The user's edits are mostly damaging. While they did do some constructive edits, they do that along with the addition of nonsense. So far as their edit history is concerned, the user do not completely know what they are doing.

I already reported the user to the DWG for the second time, and is pending a longer (or indefinite block). I also set up a ticket at OSMPH papercut_fix on GitHub (at https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/60), and reverted much of the user's latest edits.
NKA (2023-02-05 14:43:29+00:00): Det er mange doble/overlappende linjer i dette og andre endringssett for importen, f.eks. her:
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/780788808

Det skiller gjerne én node mellom de to linjene som overlapper.
Kovoschiz (2020-03-13 07:10:56+00:00): `building=apartments` is the most precise tag. Please don't change them to `building=residential` even if you are not tagging them on your own.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82141729
aharvey (2020-03-13 06:30:49+00:00): reverted due to flagged as seo spam