piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mirecnet (2015-06-23 14:03:46+00:00): Tie jaskyne maju konkretny nazov. Toto este prezistim a premenujem to.
Peter Dobratz (2015-05-01 05:49:10+00:00): You've deleted the highway tags on a lot of these Ways.  Consider reverting this chageset.
Ryan_Peterson (2015-05-01 11:55:26+00:00): Thanks for catching this! I just reverted, so it should be good now
wambacher (2015-05-02 07:48:51+00:00): Hi, any reason why you removed boundary=administrative and type=boundary from the country boundary of nepal? You just killed it completely :(
skquinn (2015-05-20 19:35:23+00:00): I cleaned this up a bit, adding a residential landuse polygon named "The Maroneal" surrounding the buildings instead of naming each building the same thing. If you know the building numbers they should be added with ref=* tags.
Peter Dobratz (2015-05-06 17:54:55+00:00): Thanks for fixing this!
jlcod (2015-04-30 23:52:43+00:00): hello, it looks that the random rectangular lines had been camps, mapped with very new images, not available on the ID editor with bing images. You  may ask someone to revert these things. please look closely at the tags of an object before removing it.
westdale (2015-04-30 23:55:07+00:00): Thanks for the comment  - had only been requested to map buildings etc - camps not mentioned in instructions but now understood.
jlcod (2015-05-01 02:04:24+00:00): now partially reverted (only the camps) with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30678635
jlcod (2015-05-01 01:59:58+00:00): I reverted the two removed camps with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30678574
Peter Dobratz (2016-12-23 07:11:39+00:00): Where does the "Big Blue" name come from.  Is this something other than a single family residential property?
geografa (2016-12-23 20:48:22+00:00): If I recall correctly, we were torn to name this since a colleague had a business he wanted to indicate but I believe this is no longer the case. I'm removing the name.
jlcod (2015-05-01 02:14:05+00:00): hello, in this changeset you removed two camp sites which were created with very new images, not available on the ID editor with bing images. Please look closely at the tags of an object before removing it and do not remove the camps. thank you.
Hjart (2015-05-20 19:01:23+00:00): Thank you. You're of course welcome to do further modifications wherever you find it beneficial.

Welcome to our project
4rch (2015-05-01 11:25:21+00:00): Hallo seichter, mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass du ein paar Grate anhand von Bing-Bildern eingetragen hast. Leider sind die Bing-Bilder im Hochgebirge, vor allem entlang der Grate und Gipfel ziemlich verzerrt. Landsat-Aufnahmen hingengen sind meinem Gefühl nach wenig bis garnicht verzerrt. Zur Kontrolle vergleiche ich dann immer noch mit SRTM-Höhendaten (z.B. die OpenCycleMap in JOSM enthält Höhendaten).

Gruß Arch
Tocosibirsk (2015-06-01 14:38:04+00:00): Wurden die Wege versehentlich oder absichtlich gelöscht?
Rolf Lang (2015-06-07 06:40:20+00:00): Hallo Tocosibirsk,
bin absoluter Neuling bei OSM. Konnte zunächst mit deiner Mail nichts anfangen. Habe jetzt erst gesehen, was du meinst. Ich war in dem Gebiet unterwegs und habe von meinem Navi die Strecke in die OSM Karte geladen. Dann habe ich am Bärenstein noch die "Bank" platziert - weiter nichts. Beim Beenden des Programms habe ich auch keine Meldung bzgl. einer Löschung gesehen. Bin davon ausgegangen, dass nur meine Navi-Route von der Karte verschwindet und keiner der vorgetragenen Wege.
Werde künftig die Finger von OSM lassen bzw. mir erst eine Schulung verpassen.
Gruß Rolf Lang
ThejeshGN (2015-05-01 09:36:40+00:00): One way rules were changed in  April 2015. So I updated as per that.
Supaplex (2015-05-01 17:37:51+00:00): 你好
我已經加了廁所的標籤，之後會在地圖會顯示對應的圖示，後續可以補充更多廁所型式的資訊
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30698560
jlcod (2015-05-01 18:17:02+00:00): camps reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30699285
samuelrussell (2015-05-03 22:36:07+00:00): So the Gibbon Street SUP that is clearly marked between Lawson and Redfern on the Western side, what's that?

Did you walk the ground before this edit?
chris2037 (2015-05-04 02:02:02+00:00): Samuel, highway=cycleway and cycleway=track are for intended for purpose built, separated cycleways (e.g., Bourke Street Cycleway). A footpath where bicycles are permitted should be tagged as path/footway/sidewalk with bicycle=yes.
samuelrussell (2015-05-11 03:46:35+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Urban_Footpaths_and_Cycleways
>Australian shared path (Bicycle and Pedestrian sign) 
>highway=cycleway, foot=designated (in discussion)
fkv (2017-05-01 17:35:28+00:00): Wir haben bei Node 3490898296 keine Pecherhütte gesehen. Wie genau sind die Koordinaten?
XimeX (2017-05-01 19:16:02+00:00): Die Koordinaten sollten eigentlich auf einige Meter genau stimmen. Hab die Informationen von einer Ausstellung über die Pecherhütten in unserer Umgebung.
http://www.hernstein.gv.at/system/web/fotogalerie.aspx?detailonr=225094884&page=3&menuonr=220297538
Bonix-Mapper (2016-05-09 02:40:23+00:00): CitymapperHQ, 
Hello ,
I spoke with other Brazilian users on the connection between the bike path and the Avenida Engenheiro Caetano Alvares .
The understanding is that it should not be done.
I wonder if I can fix without you redo later.
Thank you.

----------
Olá ,
Eu conversei com outros  usuários brasileiros sobre a ligação entre a ciclovia e a Avenida Engenheiro Caetano Álvares. 
O entendimento é que ele não deve ser feito.
Gostaria de saber se posso corrigir sem que você refaça depois.
Obrigado.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-01 17:26:46+00:00): Tutaj coś się nie domknęło. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2736095#map=17/49.88825/19.80432
Pozdrawiam
SomeoneElse (2015-05-19 11:03:08+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342070897 is clearly a building of some sort, but what?  If it's some garages, than building=garages might apply, or even just "building=yes".
chattiewoman (2015-05-01 16:46:25+00:00): Danke :-)
4rch (2015-05-01 14:26:37+00:00): Hello courage325, please take the time to follow tutorials from the mapgive and learnosm sites. You've wrongly mapped some highways as streams within this changeset.

http://mapgive.state.gov/learn-to-map/
http://learnosm.org/en/
4rch (2015-05-01 14:48:18+00:00): Ok, I've fixed the misclassifications you've made in the past (highways and water).

Regards Arch
Jojo4u (2015-05-03 19:20:51+00:00): I agree this is the more sensible layout. But according to Mapbox/Bing your alignment is quite off. You concerd seemed to be routing only. Either use placement=* or put the way in the middle of the street. I may do it later this week.

Regards, Joachim
Rob McCracken (2015-05-04 10:55:16+00:00): Yeah, have a go. I think the minis are placed OK but the roads in-between are a bit off. It's tricky to get a good compromise. The minis are very large in real life but are point-like on the map and the connecting roads have central reservations so have to be drawn as two. This makes the internal path very wiggly which it isn't in real life.
Jojo4u (2015-05-10 19:05:33+00:00): Done: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=30972310
Jojo4u (2015-05-10 19:16:59+00:00): This was pretty ugly, i aligned the outer ring more right: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=30972691
jlcod (2015-05-01 15:32:45+00:00): Hallo, 
bei deinen Änderungen wurden auch einige Camps (idp:camp_site 	spontaneous_camp) gelöscht, die unter Bing leider nicht zu sehen sind. Falls die Camps auch auf den neueren Bildern (nicht Bing) nicht existieren ist alles in Ordnung. Falls nicht, würde ich darum bitten, die Camps stehen zu lassen. Danke!
jlcod (2015-05-01 18:17:33+00:00): camps reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30699121
literan (2015-05-02 10:20:26+00:00): а откуда информация, что не существует? Исключили из реестра? Вообще там должен быть остановочный пункт новой кольцевой электрички. 

И еще - если вы пишете, что не существует, то почему не удаляете теги name= ?
MUR83 (2015-05-02 18:21:24+00:00): Загляните в википедию - там есть источник. Или на местности - станции и входных светофоров нет. Ну или в документы МЖД - тоже в инете найти можно. О.п. МК МЖД только строятся, их ещё нет (не введены) - поэтому на карте ещё не указываются. И эти о.п. никак в большинстве своём не привязаны к местоположению старых станций.
bielebog (2015-05-03 16:24:50+00:00): Das _ist_ eine Fahrbahnverengung, sie _heißt_ aber nicht Fahrbahnverengung. Das name-Tag ist hier deshalb nicht angebracht :)
dgitto (2017-07-12 18:48:59+00:00): "34° CD A.Durante" che cosa vuol dire? non conosci il nome completo.
Anche ITIS T.Campanella e IC Casanova probabilmente sono abbreviazioni. Le quali sarebbero da evitare quando possibile
dgitto (2017-07-12 18:49:31+00:00): volevo dire: non conosci il nome completo?
Ciao
FvGordon (2019-10-14 20:32:37+00:00): Are the northern 50 metres of Calle Nueva oneway? Can you please correct this (oneway=yes;no).
Santiago Calero (2019-10-14 21:15:43+00:00): The whole street "Nueva" is one way
Socks (2015-05-01 20:35:43+00:00): What's with name=disabled_symbol - that (and nearby "roughlydrawn") is surely not actually the names of the feature is it?
Govanus (2015-05-02 14:01:38+00:00): ok I think I was rushed I only had a 5 miniute slots to log in and draw at that time because the computer was a reboot timer in a library, so it is a bit rushed in those places.

Disabled symbol = 267F in unicode (I didn't have time to look it up

the building needed realigning and the note should have passed into a fixme tag from the name tag.
Govanus (2015-05-02 14:33:28+00:00): ok made these corrections though the building needs work I wanted to get a part in so the relation ship for offsetting to imagery made more sense it's a scale thing with bing vertical imagery and fuzzy closeups with too much shadow and overhanging things the bing non-vertical images are miles better most of the time but not good for vertically view horizontal  aligning by trace. the parallax lean has the building coming over the bin overspill area so it is tough to comprehend IMHOATT.
naoliv (2016-06-09 12:24:14+00:00): Esse garimpo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3491287189 é um lugar que chama "garimpo" (já que está com place=hamlet) ou só é um garimpo comum mesmo?
jlcod (2015-05-01 16:57:30+00:00): Hello, it looks like you accidentally deleted some camps (idp:camp_site=spontaneous_camp) that are not visible in the bing images. They look like random rectangular lines in the ID editor but had been created in another HOT-Task with more recent images. Please take a closer look on the tags of an object before deleting it. Thank you!
jlcod (2015-05-01 18:16:27+00:00): camps reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30699322
Snorkle (2015-05-01 18:34:34+00:00): I'm sorry about the deletions. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.  I shouldn't be deleting anything... Is there a simple way to flag something for a second opinion?
jlcod (2015-05-01 18:47:30+00:00): You could leave a comment after unlocking your tile for the next one who is opening it. Or if you have questions, ask at the mailing list or the IRC at #hot
4rch (2015-05-02 08:47:03+00:00): Hello courage325, this is not a stream, this is a path: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340429403/history
this is not a drain, it is also a path: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340429399/history
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-08 07:28:58+00:00): Hello Avouspierre. Thanks for your contribution. I delete highway (Way 342111765) due did not exist on the imagery (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30188/task/142913727). Thank you.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-13 13:34:51+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś ten budynek? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106305691/history
aufachse (2015-05-01 19:02:27+00:00): Ist das so richtig? Oder ist da ein Viewpoint versehentlich verrutscht?
3491554850, v1
Jojo4u (2015-05-10 16:45:19+00:00): Hallo bigbug, der Karoline-Kaulla-Weg  ist also wieder offen - schön! Dürfen da nicht auch Radfahrer drüber? Oder ist explizit Zeichen 239?

LG Joachim
bigbug21 (2015-05-14 07:52:59+00:00): Gute Frage. Zumindest beim provisorischen Übergang vom Querbahnsteig hängt da kein Schild.
dudka (2015-05-01 19:55:43+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=500708#p500708
Hjart (2015-05-02 07:16:48+00:00): Jeg har rettet åbningstiderne her, så de kan læses af diverse programmer
austi1996 (2015-05-04 10:09:15+00:00): Hi, why do you have deleted the detailed forests which I have added using Bing and Mapbox imagery.?
naoliv (2015-07-19 15:42:24+00:00): natinacio, por favor, não altere a classificações dos locais da maneira que você está fazendo.
A classificação se dá pela população.
Um lugar como "village" indica apenas que possui uma população menor (e não que seja uma vila).
Utilize essa tabela para evitar erros futuros: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:place#Valores
Hjart (2015-05-03 16:27:22+00:00): Hej

Jeg har tilladt mig at forbinde de stier du har tegnet her plus forsimple dem lidt (reduceret antal noder). Bemærk at Geodatastyrelsens billeder generelt er mere akkurate end Bings + at det i skove ofte er lettere at se stier mm.

Velkommen til vores iøvrigt
Unusual Kevin (2015-05-03 19:03:02+00:00): Ok. Lyder godt, jeg havde aldrigt tænkt over om geodatastyrelsen have luftfoto, men vil prøve at kigge på dem nu.

Tak for velkomsten, og tak for råd, det er meget nyttigt når man er ny :)
Hjart (2015-05-04 21:31:33+00:00): Hvis du er interesseret så er der en dansk OSM postliste: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk.
fkv (2015-06-15 12:45:52+00:00): Ich möchte dich ersuchen, ohne Ortskenntnis keine Höhlen, Felsen oder Steinbrüche zu verschieben. Die Aufnahme der Daten vor Ort war schwierig genug, und wenn du alles frei nach Luftbild verschiebst, wird es fast unmöglich die richtigen Daten wiederherzustellen.

Außerdem setze bitte kein source=basemap.at auf Wege, die ich angelegt habe. Wenn du (zweifelhafte) Namen aus basemap.at hinzufügst, dann nimm source:name=basemap.at.
j0la (2015-06-16 10:07:48+00:00): Zuerst einmal bin ich Ortskundiger - aufgewachsen und lebe in Mörbisch am See (zwei Ortschaften weiter). Kenne die Steinbrüche deshalb auch zur Genüge.
 
Natürlich ist es viel Aufwand Koordinaten von Höhlen und anderen Merkmalen aufzunehmen. Will keinem seine (teils) harte und vor allem freiwillig erbrachte Arbeit zunichte machen. Aber aus eigener Erfahrung mit GPS Aufzeichnungen weiß ich, dass diese in der Nähe von hohen Wänden, durch reflexionen des GPS Signals, starke Streuung aufweisen. Somit vertraue ich in solchen Fällen eher dem Satellitenbild. Welches natürlich durch die perspektivische Verzerrung auch nicht zu 100% korrekt sein kann.

Bzgl. source=basemap, wenn jemand so fortgeschritten ist und das Versionsprotokoll ausliest, dann ist auch zu sehen, dass ich der Übertäter war und source=basemap hinzugefügt habe und nicht du.

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis mit source:name, wusste ich bisher nicht. Weiters weiß ich auch, dass basemap nicht immer die richtigen Name eingetragen hat. Aber hier war mein Gedanke, kein Name ist zu 100% Falsch, der Name aus basemap ist zumindest zu 90% Richtig (bei der vorsichtigen Annahme, dass jeder 10te Name in basemap Falsch ist). Werde aber demnächst vorbei fahren, hoffentlich ist orgendwo der Name beschildert.
fkv (2015-06-16 16:44:14+00:00): Ok. Aber die Geisriegellucke (node 1089044634) ist auf jeden Fall an der äußeren (westexponierten) Wand. 2011, als ich sie eingetragen habe, habe ich die Orthofotos schon genutzt. Nur das Orthofoto allein hilft aber nicht, weil man darauf die Höhle gar nicht sieht. Auch die Ausdehnung verwachsener Steinbrüche sieht man am Orthotofo schlecht, dafür eignet sich besser ein Laserscan.
Hjart (2015-05-02 06:42:33+00:00): Hej. Jeg har tilladt mig at fjerne de cykelveje du har tegnet langs Borups Alle, da de allerede var markeret med cycleway=track på selve bilvejen. Se iøvrigt http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning. 

Bemærk at i DK er det ofte at foretrække at tegne efter Geodatastyrelsens fotos fremfor Bings

Velkommen til vores projekt iøvrigt og god fornøjelse med det
seichter (2015-05-03 09:30:57+00:00): Ways without any tags are of no use.
Bing has too low resolution in this region.
Use Mapbox or DigitalGlobe instead.
Socks (2015-05-02 20:43:04+00:00): Hi - please don't use highway=towpath until you've got consensus on the wiki - it's going to break routing and mapping unless it's agreed upon.
GerdP (2015-11-15 11:00:18+00:00): please review:
I've changed the rarely used
highway=historic
historic=yes
to
historic=aqueduct
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342159083
dolphinling (2015-05-02 11:33:23+00:00): Oops, the changeset here clearly should have been Pearl Street, not Pine
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-02 02:39:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 28442818, 28436316, 28446185, 28445086, 28436077, 28444368, 28443891, 28435284, 28435505, 28443244.
jumbanho (2015-07-29 21:50:59+00:00): I changed WI 50 back to primary.  Bing shows many accesses, strava bugs showed bicycle activity and there is no other evidence that this really is a limited access motorway.
Polarbear (2015-08-18 23:14:42+00:00): Hallo Chrisss, was ist denn ein playground='gum_wobble_tape' in Nodes 3492157643 und 3490822530 ? Vielleicht eine Slackline?
Nakaner (2015-05-25 11:05:41+00:00): Könntest du bitte mal deine OpenRailwayMap-Objektvorlagen aktualisieren? Du verwendest nämlich noch das alte Signal-Taggingschema. Demnächst werden wir diese Signale nicht mehr rendern (nachdem der mechanische Edit dazu abgeschlossen ist).
ohligser (2015-05-25 18:50:35+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Erledigt.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-01 23:44:53+00:00): (continuing from changeset comment) I'm familiar with quite a few places on this list and at first glance _none_ of them appears to have a genuine Russian name.  Some (e.g. Great Dunmow, Swadlincote) are little more than villages.

If there's a need to make up Russian names as a data source for something external (in this case I believe a computer game) please do that outside of OSM.

It's important because some of the places on this list (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27160281 ) do have more than one name - Y Fenni (Welsh) and Abergavenny (English).  Those are genuine, verifiable, different (not "soundalike") names for a place.  To add made-up "translations" trawled from Google dilutes the genuine, valid name information currently in OSM for e.g. Abergavenny.
Peter Mead (2015-05-05 08:40:55+00:00): I do not see a valid reason why this was reverted.
Although you have a constant opposition to these changes there were several people in support when discussed on talk-gb IRC last week.
Wynndale (2015-06-03 19:39:57+00:00): Why don’t you write an article for the Daily Express explaining how you’re a knight in shining  armour gallantly holding back against Russian in OSM?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-02 00:17:56+00:00): What does mean "CZ update"?
pedro' (2015-05-02 00:20:44+00:00): It's update of Czech address, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_adres_z_RUIAN
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-02 02:39:16+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 28442818, 28436316, 28446185, 28445086, 28436077, 28444368, 28443891, 28435284, 28435505, 28443244.
Kaziu Kisiel (2015-05-05 07:10:41+00:00): I seemed that russian wikipedia articles are 100 % credible (according to for example M4 article).
literan (2015-05-05 09:39:59+00:00): As I am one of the admins of Russian wikipedia, may say you: do not trust it so much. This part of M4 got motorway about three years ago, but a year after they removed these road signs, don't know why.
AlaskaDave (2017-09-16 00:25:39+00:00): Johnny, the sign you used to set maxspeed here is actually a weight limit. In your Mapillary photo the 21 ตัน means 21 tons.
AlaskaDave (2017-09-16 00:29:54+00:00): I had always wondered what those signs meant, so you're not alone in misinterpreting them.
Johnny Carlsen (2017-09-16 03:08:44+00:00): The signs double as a speed limit for clueless foreigners :)
kwadada (2015-05-02 00:45:34+00:00): This square looks to be done.
user_5359 (2016-07-10 04:38:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because you are not a street. Please try again to mark your business position (and not the street) to add your business.

If you need help: You are welcome.
SK53 (2015-05-02 20:56:28+00:00): I suggest you check changeset source tags when doing this kind of edit. 

You could also have dropped me a message or a note to the effect that the more widely used tag is bookbinder. I much prefer that approach than just changing tags without asking the original mapper.
St1ll (2015-05-02 04:47:22+00:00): дома были перепутаны местами...
TheSwavu (2015-05-08 21:52:38+00:00): "non-existent" Nudurr Drive was tagged proposed (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed?uselang=en-GB).
o'cholio (2015-05-09 11:58:26+00:00): Well, it appeared as an existing road on all map renders. And as the road doesn't physically exist yet, yes, it is still non-existent. But at least it now appears as a proposed road should, ie dotted line with tag highway=proposed.
ahislop (2015-05-02 06:20:20+00:00): Not actually part of #hotosm-project-1018. Didn't realize that metadata was still in the edit comment information, and it doesn't look like I can edit changeset information.
SekeRob (2022-03-06 17:20:01+00:00): Hi,

May I be so bold to dig deep in your memory please. You mapped a group of fossi in the Majella park and tagged level=-1 some 7 years ago. Osmose has been flagging this with "Waterway with level way 342244766 josm iD edit" since as long as I've been mapping the park details in the last year. Are these streams/brooks sub surface? If so then how you know where they are ;o), certainly I'd tag them than with layer=-1, but Osmose will complain afterwards there's no tunnel key. Also I think they'd need the intermittent key as these streams are often dry, in the latter summer particularly when all snow melt has throughly ended. Any comment is appreciated.

Ciao.
Rob
Vespucci (2022-03-06 18:04:30+00:00): Hi Rob,
the level = -1 added to those streams, actually I usually put that tag in order to avoid error in the intersections with roads, paths etc. I didn't know that Osmose or other programs were affected by this choice. Those streams/brooks are not sub surface.
For which concerns the intermittent key, honestly I'd never used it since in Mediterranean area most of the streams don't have water all the year, but that attribute seemed to me too extreme compared to sub desertic environment.
Ciao
Marco
SekeRob (2022-03-06 18:22:11+00:00): The modern editors actually alert when crossing ways asking to add tunnel, bridge or Ford and nicely cut up the stream or road depending on the choice and add the selected key.
Intermittente is really when not continuous. Many of the dit h system here on carry water when it rains and then there are countleas reservoirs to capture it until the basis are full. Default when creating they even get the intermittente tag. layer=-1 is the standard to put something sub surface. tunnels/culverts get that by default. 
Now that i know the situation I'll correct it on the next mapping session in the area

Salute 
Rob
Vespucci (2022-03-06 21:30:30+00:00): Ok, in the next editing sessions I will adapt to your suggestions.
Thank you for letting me know.
Marco
OlaviV (2015-05-02 09:33:04+00:00): I also seem to have created an idle line, but I don't know how to delete it. I'm a first-time user, sorry... :(
Nakaner (2015-05-05 20:05:08+00:00): Es wäre mir neu, wenn im Stadtgebiet von Brackenheim Stellplätze Hausnummern hätten. (Ich wohne im Stadtgebiet). Bitte entferne daher die Adresstags wieder von den Parkplätzen. Nur Gebäude (aber nur das Hauptgebäude, nicht die Nebengebäude) und ggf. Ladengeschäfte, Gaststätten und Co. erhalten Adresstags.
slu-010101 (2015-05-05 20:30:57+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, hab es schon geändert.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-03 16:12:56+00:00): Hej
Dzięki, że rysujesz budynki i dodajesz adresy. Pomyślałem, że może chciałbyś dodawać kompletną adresację, bo sam numer porządkowy to trochę mało. Więcej nt. tagowania adresacji: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Pozdrawiam