piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LockOnGuy (2022-09-01 02:10:38+00:00): Why are you keep deleting the name:ar for this node?       
 https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2488229258        
The correct name is "باش تبة	" please restore it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125633462
SomeoneElse (2022-09-01 07:43:40+00:00): @LockOnGuy Saying "keep deleting" omits the fact that the key was last edited in 2018: https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/2488229258 .  I'd suggest just adding name:ar back.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%DA%95%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%DB%8C has been told at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6298 that they shouldn't change name:ar values incorrectly, and I'm sure you'll let us know if they do.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-02 02:51:45+00:00): @SomeoneElse, he STILL and KEEP change the name:ar to Kurdish, he never stopped, your message in the block for him was 4 days ago, and he STILL does this, he did one 3 hours ago, see:    
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1048569873/history     
He changed it from "شارع هەڵبەند" to "شەقامی گوڵان" the word "شارع" is "street" in Arabic and "شەقامی" is street in Kurdish, and the 2nd word for both is just Kurdish name written in Kurdish letters. So basically he changed the word "street" from Arabic to Kurdish in name:ar again.     
     
He deleted tens if not hundreds of Arabic names for villages, towns, streets, shops, and other objects from northern Iraq, and he and other users too.     
Changing 'name' tag from Arabic to Kurdish is not a problem inside The Kurdish region since it's majority Kurd speaking areas, but deleting name:ar is wrong, especially in areas outside the Kurdish region like Kirkuk, Nineveh and Diyala states, I had seen many issues like this and fixed them but it's just too many especially when there is hundreds or thousands of villages and a user have thousands of changesets to check. 
So, is there any way to check for deleted 'name:ar' in a specific area? like overpass-turbo query? and I will check every single element if there is a way that shows all of deleted 'name:xx' things.
Violaine_Do (2022-12-21 21:29:31+00:00): ok, corrigé. Problème de doublon dans les amenity, et de dessin du bati.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125633886
Supaplex (2022-09-01 03:16:23+00:00): 個人看法：眷村或其他住宅區我比較傾向畫出區域然後加名字，而不是用地名的點
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125633972
aleno150 (2022-09-07 14:03:18+00:00): I don't know if there are any guidelines how to map a ferry stop with several access points for cars and passengers. I tried the wiki and searched other major harbours but I must admit I found several solutions at all locations. Is there any way to highlight that question for a general statement?
stefanct (2022-09-08 01:49:52+00:00): Hi,

I am also not aware of any discussion and the wiki so far does not give any hints, so I tried to come up with something that has the least downsides without breaking too many things but it is of course not ideal - mostly because data users don't care about the intermittent=yes and thus the ways "on" the ferries from the shore till the amenity POI are interpreted as actual static bridges.

I documented my thoughts concurrently to this edit on the discussion site of the ferry relation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:route%3Dferry#Mapping_separate_gangways/loading_bays_for_vehicles_and_passengers

However, it's very seldom that I have seen really good discussions happening in the wiki so I wouldn't hold my breath for a quick solution. Nevertheless please don't hesitate to add your view there (it certainly will be seen by more people eventually than a discussion here).

Alternatives to the wiki would be for example the tagging mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging) or probably any other community bubble with experiences mappers that can give any feedback.
aleno150 (2022-09-08 12:02:58+00:00): Even if I could follow and understand your discussion I think I would prefer to have only one ferry stop/terminal at the main location and leave gangways and other ramps unconnected. But I guess there will be different opinions and I have also seen the solution with connecting everything with a ferry route. For the right ferry location in Gothenburg it's hard to tell which road are the main boarding road. On the other hand had the catamaran been static at the same location for years so sometimes I have been tampered to paint the ferry as a part of the map. :)
stefanct (2022-09-08 17:14:16+00:00): Then the question would be, what IS the "main location"? That's quite subjective and also hard to verify. On some ferries/routes the majority of people enter/exit the ship on foot via the gangways (if you count in the service personal, which is a few hundred people on night ferries, that's even more common - but presumably they seldom use a map to find their ways :). I have used probably more than a dozen of different ferry routes without ever sitting in a passenger car (but entered mostly on foot, in busses and even trains).

If you meant to have the ferry terminal node "floating" in the water without *any* connection to the shore then you break routing completely. That's definitely not the way to go :) 

IMHO we just need to make sure that data users can clearly distinguish between static and intermittent parts of the ramps/bridges and make this common practice.
RicoElectrico (2022-09-01 03:12:40+00:00): To nie jest bank. Proszę wybrać typ obiektu "Firma pożyczkowa". Myślę też, że lepiej skasować ten długi opis, a nawet miasto.
Nawfal85 (2022-09-02 14:53:17+00:00): Thank you for correcting the name of the street...
Nawfal85 (2022-09-02 14:56:41+00:00): There are many users who changed the names of my city streets without having knowledge.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-03 05:03:18+00:00): You welcome, Yes, few users contacted me too about those Iranian mappers, I left them a long instructional comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125446349 and send him a message too. They still have many other errors still, lets see if they correct them or just leave them wrong.
kartler175 (2022-09-04 11:43:06+00:00): Two different features at same position:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295525073#map=17/49.18454/-121.68698https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090883560#map=17/49.18454/-121.68698
ChehrehBargi (2023-01-16 05:55:09+00:00): سلام
کاربری این مسیر درست ثبت شده. آن را تغییر ندهید
mrpulley (2024-06-14 12:44:39+00:00): Bushland Drive (443175418) is maxspeed 50 (not 60)
I didn't see a maxspeed sign for Kanangra Drive (443174878) at survey May 2024
mrpulley (2026-02-28 06:51:25+00:00): 386410347 maxspeed correct
115306154 no maxspeed sign at survey Nov 2025 so unable to confirm maxspeed.
Cucazer (2022-09-01 16:19:36+00:00): Raiņa iela? It is nowhere near this place!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125639210
bikingaround244 (2022-10-10 01:01:34+00:00): Hi Amazon,

You marked this as all=private. This may be true for motor vehicles. I can only speak for bikes and foot this is not private. People are allowed to bike and walk down here it connects to the harbor walk and it. 

PLEASE do NOT change all=private. It says your source is driver feedback. Then only change for motor vehicles please.
deepikja (2022-10-10 15:47:52+00:00): Hello Bikingaround244,

Thank you for reviewing the changeset and providing your insightful recommendations. Based on the boards found using the available overlays, we added access all=private. Furthermore, the roads are located within a gated community, so we prefer to add all access=private to ensure privacy for the residents referring to OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=private.

With the boards available we are currently unable to determine whether the access would be restricted for motor vehicles or all. We would appreciate it if you could provide us with suggestions or any published article/links which will help us incorporate changes for our future edits.

Regards,
Deepika
bob3bob3 (2026-07-21 11:27:19+00:00): Going back back back into time.. Is Mt Moffatt Rd really sealed this far north? QLD Imagery (always a bit old) only has about 2km from the south end. Doing some surface tag cleanup after driving Injune>Forestvale>Mitchell yesterday. Should have sidetracked up here too.
TreeTracks (2026-07-21 23:22:31+00:00): Hi Bob, hope all is well. I’m away atm and can’t look this up. I would have tagged it from imagery rather than  a site visit, and the imagery has probably improved since I mapped it. So please update the surface tags as you see fit, which will undoubtedly improve the map. Best wishes.
bob3bob3 (2026-07-22 02:40:58+00:00): Mmm okay

You did use Maxar imagery which was often the latest available. GM/GE (bad!), and QLD Imagery though actually agree with the paving stop point.

The bit in contention is about 30km long. This would probably be rated as a major Qld Govt project possibly done by Maranoa Regional and I see no news on that topic. They have certainly done a lot of patching and long re-bitumen runs on what had already been paved. (from overheads) It is the main route to the Mt Moffatt end of Carnarvon NP and a farms road. Qld Parks advertising talks about 4WD being needed and to be careful. No mention of this route being improved.

Have made the change. I will however also ask Jordal as he seems to be involved in a road safety transport business where his clients give surface etc feedback. His report was enough for me to risk the Taroom<>Injune Rd (156km) of which 55km is unsealed/bumpy. The eastern end of that is being actively sealed.

Doing well. Parked at campsite for the next 2-3 months..
highflyer74 (2022-09-05 13:53:49+00:00): Moin!

Kannst du dich erinnern, was genau du hier verbessern wolltest? Es gibt jetzt einen Punkt mit der Nummer 20 und einen mit der Nummer 21, welcher fast auf gleicher Position liegt. Durch den Edit überschneidet sich jetzt eine Relation mit sich selbst, die ich gern reparieren würde.

Insgesamt verlaufen dort drei Grenzrelationen. Insofern ist Vespucci vielleicht nicht das richtige Werkzeug...

Auch möchte ich dir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments ans Herz legen, da sich dadurch Rückfragen meist schon erledigen ;-)

Gruss aus HB!
lefuturiste (2022-09-01 07:39:28+00:00): + ajout de broussailles lel
gscholz (2022-09-04 05:24:51+00:00): Hi  KwaXoloXolo,
you recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=31.79531&lat=-25.55493&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.79531&lat=-25.55493&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
IlBano (2022-12-31 15:18:48+00:00): Ciao DDeL.
Vedo che la rotatoria non è più marcata come in costruzione, ma ha ancora il tag access=no. E' quindi ancora chiusa al traffico ?

Grazie
IlBano
DDeL (2022-12-31 15:47:44+00:00): Ciao,
è stata una dimenticanza da parte mia! 
Grazie della segnalazione ora correggo.
Tilia_J (2022-09-06 12:18:04+00:00): Wijziging teruggedraaid. Object staat gewoon op palen en was ooit onderdeel van loopbrug naar de vaste wal
user_5359 (2022-09-03 05:57:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/653858798. what is the meaning of the tag https://www.orea.cz/en/hotel-angelo = Carnide?
Bolt033 (2022-09-05 05:03:30+00:00): Hi. Thank you for reporting this. Carnide remained from a previous edit in OSM, for Carnide city in Portugal and by mistake I created this tag. I deleted it.
NicoSa (2023-03-03 12:56:27+00:00): Wer sagt denn, dass Fußwege explizit als solche gekennzeichnet sein müssen? Dies ist bei Rad - oder Reitwegen anders. Diese sind in nahezu allen Fällen entsprechend gekennzeichnet und müssen als Dieses auch erkennbar sein! Ist dort keine entsprechende Kennzeichnung vorhanden handelt dort jeder Radler/Reiter ordnungswidrig!
喵耳引力波 (2022-09-01 08:33:13+00:00): This is manual restore for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125631688 , I only manual restore those tiny part because I review the deletion in JOSM. I support admin's deletion.
喵耳引力波 (2022-09-01 08:33:10+00:00): This is manual restore for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125631688 , I only manual restore those tiny part because I review the deletion in JOSM. I support admin's deletion.
aTarom (2022-10-01 11:55:11+00:00): Hola lluisvicens,
es va quedar aquesta via sense etiquetar

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090936361/history

te'n recordes si seria un
track, residential, ...
amb PNOA no ho veig clar

salutacions
easbar (2022-10-28 09:28:01+00:00): It looks like the restriction relation 166650 is missing to- and via-members after your change. Can you fix or delete it?
Stefan Karl (2022-09-07 18:49:41+00:00): Hallo Bernhard, 
meine Antwort zu den Hausnummern Seewiesstraße 1 und 1a: Ja, die gibt es wirklich und sind vor Ort ausgeschildert. Die Adresse Seewiesstraße 1 ist auch auf den Websites dort ansässiger Betriebe zu finden. Ich frage mich schon wieder, woher du deine Informationen nimmst. 
Viele Grüße, Stefan (der deine Änderungen zunehmend kritisch betrachtet)
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-04 03:58:24+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent import from unauthorised source: changeset/133276215
LockOnGuy (2022-09-03 05:57:06+00:00): Please use a good changeset comment next time.          
You should've explained to the mappers what you edited and why.      
Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
s@jj@d (2022-09-03 18:04:21+00:00): Hello, good time, thank you for your comments
Yes, I will definitely explain more clearly from now on
Hugoren Martinako (2022-10-18 18:43:32+00:00): Bona tarda,

Si us plau, no cal que facis servir multipoligons per tot arreu. Això afegeix un grau important de complexitat quan desprès s'hagués de treballar per la zona, a més d'una major possibilitat d'espatllar aquestes relacions per mapejadors novells.

Fent servir la drecera del teclat "F" al JOSM, pots crear múltiples àrees més fàcilment https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/FollowLine

Salutacions
Dodko (2022-12-05 22:10:42+00:00): Treba dávať pozor pri ref:minvskaddress aby nebolo duplicitné z inej adresy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59366322/history
jeslop (2022-09-01 09:34:16+00:00): Hola Elmo12. Gracias por tus contribuciones.

Tus comentarios en los conjuntos de cambios no ayudan al resto de usuarios a entender o ver los cambios que has realizado. En la wiki te explica las directrices a seguir: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Saludos

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
abakus_uploader (2022-09-01 22:30:53+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-09-01 22:30:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
literan (2022-09-01 20:09:43+00:00): надо было не точку stop_position с концами удалять, а просто убрать ее из отношения автобуса т39К.

откатил, исправил
eggie (2022-09-06 07:08:45+00:00): Dag Bauke,
Wanneer er nog niets te zien is in het veld dan geplande wegen invoeren als 
highway=proposed
proposed=living_street.. Dus niet als een bestaande straat.
Zodra aan de weg wordt gewerkt dan highway=construction
Zie sat dataportaal juli 2022
Is de straat al opgeleverd?
MVG
eggie

https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=06-09-2021&loc=53.22156%2C5.489017%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-07-17&acqid=20220717_103340_SV1-01&sensor=SuperView-1
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-04 11:57:44+00:00): Ciao. Il barrier che hai disegnato non ha alcun effetto sul routing perché non ha elementi in comune con la viabilità. La cosa più semplice da fare è quella di inserire il barrier dove la highway cambia classificazione. Attenzione anche ai tag inseriti. locked=yes su un barrier=chain non ha senso. Ciao, Andrea
Gael de Sailly (2022-10-01 14:56:36+00:00): Bonjour,
place=city désigne les grandes villes (100 000+ habitants en général) et n'est pas pertinent dans le cas du Pont-de-Claix. J'ai changé en place=town.
Tilia_J (2022-09-01 16:26:33+00:00): Goedenavond, ik las het de note op de track.

Afgesloten door beheerder impliceert idd "access=no".

Als na verloop van tijd (paar jaar) het pad overgroeid raakt dan kan "highway=track" worden vervangen door "abandoned:highway=track" en de aanliggende landuses op elkaar aangesloten worden.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-04 12:05:10+00:00): Ciao. Sicuro che ci sia l'attraversamento pedonale al termine del sentiero che hai inserito? Da nessuna foto aerea si riesce a vedere. Ciao, Andrea
MD77 (2022-09-05 08:39:42+00:00): Ciao, non ho inserito un attraversamento pedonale, o almeno non volontariamente. Lo hai già rimosso tu?
Marco
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-05 08:44:07+00:00): Ciao. No, è ancora qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9992409010 Ciao, Andrea
MD77 (2022-09-05 09:45:39+00:00): ok, capito, non avevo notato il tag "crossing" valorizzato in automatico.
Ora è solo un punto senza altri tag
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-05 15:36:36+00:00): Grazie.
Money Moustache (2022-09-11 21:56:30+00:00): Bonjour dwarfclimbs, je ne comprends pas votre ajout des deux "hameaux" appelés L'Enfer et Le Paradis à Briançon:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9992413053
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9992413054

Quelle a été votre source d'information à ce sujet ?
dwarfclimbs (2022-09-18 11:14:37+00:00): Bonjour Money Moustache
Pour nommer les deux lieux-dits j'ai utilisé la sous couche du cadastre.
bxl-forever (2022-09-02 08:41:18+00:00): Hello,

Thanks and welcome here.

I checked on GRB (official map for Flanders) and you are right, there was a mistake for the name of this street.

A few houses are missing here.
You might be interested to add them if you want.

How to do that: in the editor, you can use the Background button on the right and scroll down to "AIV Flanders GRB".  Then you will see a good map of building outlines to start drawing buildings.

For addresses, you can just fill the address "Dennedreef" and the house number 12.  No need for more.  That would be better than a single point which cannot be used because it mixes all data.

Happy mapping.
Ninzor (2022-09-02 09:27:04+00:00): Thanks for the help! I just added 3 houses with their correct addresses. This should help us a lot since no one is able to find us by GPS :D
trousperdu (2022-09-03 09:12:07+00:00): j'ai pas tous compris je debute
j'arrive meme pas a ajouter un tag
ou modifie entete de la note
Syl (2022-09-03 09:50:48+00:00): Bonjour, ici j'ai ajouté les tags disant qu'il y a un accès Wi-Fi gratuit et avec le nom du réseau.
On ne peut pas modifier le contenu d'une note, seulement ajouter des commentaires.
Pour l'ajout de tags, avec l'éditeur iD un guide est disponible pour apprendre à contribuer (en cliquant sur le bouton Modifier en haut de la page).
N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions.
trousperdu (2022-09-03 10:04:13+00:00): editeur ID ??? 
le trouve on sous linux ???
Syl (2022-09-03 12:52:57+00:00): Il s'utilise dans un navigateur, directement sur openstreetmap.org.
Il existe d'autres éditeurs disponibles sous Linux, principalement JOSM qui est très complet mais long à prendre en main. Je vous conseille de plutôt tester iD pour débuter.
Frans S (2022-09-13 09:32:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
you are mapping farmland as a building.
H: Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
 Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125647324
pyram (2025-07-07 20:12:27+00:00): Hallo rms_KKRO,

siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4843550

Hier ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9992409291/history/1 ) ist und war keine Haltestelle. Bevor ich die einfach lösche: Wie kann man sehen, ob die "ref:IFOPT" woanders hingehört? Wahrscheinlich https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/745931244 ?? Und auf welcher Grundlage ist die Haltestelle überhaupt hier gelandet?
Jrachi (2022-12-19 10:42:02+00:00): Attento hai unito varie strade che fanno parte di una relazione.
Così facendo hai distrutto la linearità del percorso EATN7030000 (703)
Riaggiusto io ma tu fai attenzione la prossima volta
Lialiuika (2023-01-31 13:37:14+00:00): Thank you for your attention! Got it

Best regards, Lelia
user_9434724 (2022-09-01 17:45:07+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090952566 is in the middle of a road and does not exist. Furthermore https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090952563 is a pedestrian walkway and doesn't even follow the actual path.
Would you please explain why you added these?
user_9434724 (2022-09-01 17:48:52+00:00): Nevermind I'm an idiot
willkmis (2022-09-01 23:36:35+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. The address entered here does not appear to match the location of the node, is this the correct location/address?
flohoff (2022-10-23 13:02:52+00:00): Moin,
seit wann darf das hier nicht mehr begangen werden und seit wann ist da am ende ein Tor? 

Ich war 2015 da und habe Fotos gemacht da war am ende ein drängelgitter und die Schilder erlaubten Explizit das Begehen und Befahren mit dem Rad.

Die sind bei Mapillary.

Flo
flohoff (2022-10-23 13:05:29+00:00): Ach ja - ich bin drauf gekommen danach zu sehen weil das im OSM Inspektor durch das eingenwillige access tagging zu einer routing insel geführt hat.


Und mit dem Access=private sind auch die Hausnummer 51 und 39 nicht mehr routingtechnisch erreichbar.

Flo
RadarOReily (2022-10-23 15:26:49+00:00): Bei dem Drängelgitter ist jetzt ein grünes Törchen und es war abgeschlossen. Kann da die Tage mal vorbeifahren und das dokumentieren.

Das mit access=private von dem Weg war ein Fehler meinerseits. Hast du ja mittlerweile geändert.