piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-11-12 22:01:08+00:00): Belangrijk is dat adres en functie gekoppeld zijn. Bv telefoonnummers...
FM2441 (2017-11-12 22:02:12+00:00): Duidelijk! Da BAG is mij wel bekend, want op de meldkamer heb ik daar veel mee te maken.

Kan ik het zo onderscheiden dat gebouwen met een publieke functie in gebouw bewerkt kunnen worden en alle andere bedrijven e.d. in de adresnode?
eggie (2017-11-12 22:08:20+00:00): Ook voor het gemeentehuis zou ik gewoon de BAG node gebruiken.
Scholen worden soms over het hele terrein getagd en dan is het weer handig dat daar de adresgegevens op staan. Er is daarover geen consensus. 
Soms zie je op het gebouw, soms het terrein, soms de node.
Nog lastiger is het als er meer instellingen op één node zitten. Dan is het schipperen.
FM2441 (2017-11-12 22:30:45+00:00): Dank je wel!

De rest van de mails ga ik vannacht doorlopen en zal na elke mutatie op opslaan klikken.
Dit is voor jullie ook makkelijker.

En ik hoor graag als ik dingen niet goed doe of anders moet doen.
eggie (2017-11-12 22:48:56+00:00): Succes..
Dino Michelini (2018-12-19 13:50:20+00:00): Ciao, a Spoleto il "Teatro lirico sperimentale A.Belli" risulta mappato in due posti diversi. Puoi verificare? Grazie
LorenzoPesci (2018-12-19 17:08:07+00:00):  il teatro lirico sperimentale ha 2 sedi : uffici in piazza della Vittoria e archivio in piazza Bovio (che era la vecchia sede)
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Saxonyking (2017-12-14 09:10:41+00:00): Ist highway=unclassified eine gute Wahl?
Klumbumbus (2017-12-14 17:45:58+00:00): Kann ich nicht genau sagen, ich war noch nicht vorort, ich habe es auch nicht ursprünglich so eingetragen, nur das access=no entfernt. Es gibt hier 2 bereits geschlossene Notes die von Freigabe für Pferdegespanne sprechen, aber das müsste nochmal überprüft werden. Aktuell ist zumindest motor_vehicle=no getaggt, was Routingfehler größtenteils ausschließen sollte. Die Brücke ist auch recht breit, wie man auf Fotos im Internet sieht, daher könnte unclassified evtl. in Ordnung sein, aber man müsste sich vorort nochmal die Beschilderung und die Nutzung auch der Zufahrtswege anschauen.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-11-12 23:06:11+00:00): I think you might be mistaken with some of these names.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-06-30 18:12:51+00:00): C'mon man - cars are not buildings...
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-06-30 18:13:31+00:00): S'il te plaît... Les voitures ne sont pas building=yes !
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Nakaner (2017-11-12 22:06:22+00:00): Hi Glassmann,

please do not use your normal OSM account if you do imports. Create a dedicated import account instead. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Best regards

Michael
Glassman (2017-11-12 23:47:43+00:00): Michael - thanks for the reminder. I know better.
dgitto (2017-11-12 23:15:33+00:00): Ciao benvenuto in OSM. correggo qualcosina, tipo il formato del numero di telefono. Ricordati se puoi di non usare abbreviazioni
Mr -G- (2017-11-12 18:07:25+00:00): The commit noe should be add Charles Reese Memorial Park
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
adrienandrem (2017-11-13 21:36:10+00:00): Isn't there a human readable name for this source?
By the way, is it a compatible one? Quick searching the Wiki, i didn't find anything about ArcGIS Online World Imagery.

Thank you for contributing
freebeer (2017-11-14 21:29:18+00:00): the URL I instantly recognise as what is now referred to as ESRI or Esri Community aerial imagery, in the last months officially permitted as a source for tracing
adrienandrem (2017-11-14 23:15:53+00:00): Palolo pointed out there is a post introducing this source:
https://blogs.esri.com/esri/arcgis/2017/08/24/world-imagery-in-osm
also mentioned on JOSM Wiki as "Esri World Imagery":
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps

I created a Wiki page about it, feel free to complete it:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Esri_World_Imagery
adrienandrem (2017-11-15 16:01:28+00:00): Found http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Esri
so the changeset should have
source=Esri
instead of the raw TMS URL
Sowa1980 (2017-11-20 06:52:16+00:00): Так я там и тегировал, как пешеходная улица, встроенными заготовками в джосме, по чему они там тротуарами вдруг то стали?
lcat (2017-11-20 07:23:18+00:00): так это не пешеходные улицы, а тротуары
30303020 (2017-11-13 08:28:11+00:00): Was bedeutet die Note »Relation ist sortiert« an der Buslinie 022? Müssten die Elemente nicht andersherum sortiert sein (zuerst die Haltestellen und dann die Wege), wie bei Buslinie  10/11/12 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7019791)?
Busbahnhof (2017-11-13 09:03:49+00:00): »Relation ist sortiert« soll darauf hinweisen, dass die Haltestellen im Linienverlauf in korrekter Reihenfolge eingepflegt sind (wichtig z.B. für die ÖPNV-Karte mit der Auflistung der Hst. im Linienverlauf). Ja stimmt, die Hst. hätten zuerst aufgelistet werden sollen :-/
Nakaner (2017-11-13 10:25:24+00:00): Hallo,

der OpenStreetMap Inspector hat seit ein paar Wochen eine, wenn auch noch nicht vollständige, Validierung von ÖPNV-Routenrelationen. http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=12.46930&lat=53.47963&zoom=13

Den Link dazu gab es neulich in der Wochennotiz. http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/11/wochennotiz-nr-380/

Viele Grüße

Michael
30303020 (2017-11-13 15:39:22+00:00): OSM-Inspector betrachtet allerdings nur Routen, die nach PTv2 erstellt werden (genauer, die mit public_transport:version=2 getaggt sind). Das ist bei der o.g. Linie 10/11/12 übrigens nicht der Fall.
Busbahnhof (2017-11-13 16:36:40+00:00): Linie 10/11/12 ist nicht so getaggt, da sowohl klassische Haltestellen (PTV 1) wie auch PTV 2-Halte Teil der Relation sind. In solch einem Fall ist es dann 1 oder 2?
Nakaner (2017-11-13 16:48:18+00:00): Hallo Busbahnhof und 30303020,

highway=bus_stop ist ein gültiges Tag, auch im PTv2-Schema. Wenn diese Nodes neben der Straße liegen, müssen sie mit der Rolle "platform" in die Routenrelation aufgenommen werden.

Darüber hinaus möchte ich darauf hinweisen, dass es voll und ganz genügt, wenn bei einer Bushaltestelle nur die Halteposition oder nur die Plattform erfasst sind. Wenn jedoch beider erfasst sind, müssen beide in die Routenrelation aufgenommen werden. Neu-Schloen, Schwastof Abzweig, Klein Plasten und Klein Plasten Rundling nimmt man einfach mit der Rolle platform auf, da sie neben der Straße liegen. Dadurch kann man spürbar schneller mappen, da Haltepositionen bei einfachen Bushaltestellen (Haltestellenschild mit nix oder Haltestellenschild mit einfachem Busbord) keinen Vorteil bringen.

Der OSMI wertet nur Routenrelationen mit public_transport:version=2 aus, weil das das einzige Tag ist, an dem man sie von den alten unterscheiden kann. Es gibt nämlich kein richtiges v1-Schema. Würden sie alle nach v2 geprüft werden, wäre die Karte voller Fehler. (Streng genommen ist public_transport:version=2 gar nicht Bestandteil des originalen Proposals, sondern wurde von den JOSM-Entwicklern zu Unterscheidungszwecken erfunden)

Hinweis: Der OSMI prüft nicht alles. Es wird z.B. nicht geprüft, ob Mitglieder der Rolle stop auf der Straße liegen (sie müssen aber Nodes sein) und ob sie richtig geordnet sind.

Viele Grüße

Michael
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
GOwin (2017-11-13 02:12:52+00:00): Thank you for your edits. You're helping make a better map of your neighbourhood.

Instead of renaming a point when an establishment has closed for business, I suggest that you delete the old point, and then add a new one instead.

For example, the defunct Adobo Connection point could be deleted. And you create a new one for the new business, Teriyaki Boy. This allows the database to create historical information about an area. 

The only exception to this is when establishments occupy whole buildings mapped as polygons. In that case, simply renaming it is alright.
user_5359 (2017-11-13 18:12:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
GOwin (2017-11-13 02:01:23+00:00): Hello there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

We noticed that you're new in OSM, but you've been editing a lot of mature features. Kindly be careful about your edits because the live map is also being used for humanitarian work, and emergency services.

One of your changesets has been reverted, and we are reviewing the rest. 

If you want to learn more about OSM, try https://learnOSM.org, or if you're keen to know more about the local community, check out https://fb.com/OSMph/community.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Langlaeufer (2017-11-12 19:30:01+00:00): gibt für beides auf Strava-Heatmap spuren
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
GerdP (2017-11-14 08:17:03+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the tag highway=crossing used on a way like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540054529 
This tag is meant to be used on the node shared by the major road and the footway. The footway itself is mapped with highway=footway + footway=crossing.
I did not yet change it because you connected the way with a node that is tagged highway=traffic_signals and I think the footway should not use that node. Please review my changes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53764132
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
user_1566574 (2020-05-04 12:31:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5225277915/history vous indiquez un terrain de jeu ayant comme nom "Salle des fêtes".

Ce sur quoi d'autres contributeur modifient, et au final on n'y comprend plus rien. C'est à minima la 3ème erreur de votre part que je corrige cette semaine (incluant un bon nombre d'erreurs sur des adresses), pourriez-vous faire plus attention en prenant le temps d'intégrer des informations de qualité ?

Merci d'avance.
user_1566574 (2020-05-23 14:39:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90748300 vous indiquez le bâtiment comme terrain de pétanque, dont la surface est du sable.

Un petit coup d'œil sur l'imagerie IGN vous aurait permis de repérer que ledit terrain se situe juste au dessus du bâtiment.

Je songe très sérieusement à faire un signalement pour dégradation volontaire, non seulement pour les modifications à la va-vite, mais pour votre absence de réponse.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
JohnnyGPS (2017-11-12 20:15:00+00:00): Tack för detta. Jag har länge tänkt reka även detta område på plats, men har inte tagit mig tiden.  Det vore i och för sig trevligt med mer taggar, men gatunamnen är viktigast.
fatuus (2017-11-13 06:50:32+00:00): Har inte varit på plats, så det är info från öppna källor.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:17:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
eggie (2017-11-12 20:38:24+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-12 20:46:49+00:00): De eenrichting loopt precies tot de bocht bij nr 2.
Klopt dat? 
Mogen fiets-/bromfietsers wel tegen de richting in? In dat geval oneway:bicycle=no en evt. oneway:moped=no erbij taggen.
Graag reactie...
eggie (2017-11-12 20:56:09+00:00): Is wellicht de Dahliastraat ook eenrichting muv (brom) fietsers?
Patrick Ch (2017-11-12 21:18:11+00:00): Dank voor je support. 
De eenrichting loopt over naar de Dahliastraat zoals je al vermoed. Maar dat ik nog niet heb bewerkt is omdat ik niet weet hoe je een gedeelte van een straat in eenrichting kunt wijzigen. De eenrichting van de Dahliastraat eindigt namelijk bij de zijstraat Lodewijk Napolenplein.
Ook weet ik nog niet hoe je kunt taggen.
Graag je verdere support als het uitkomt.
eggie (2017-11-12 21:57:55+00:00): Oke... editor iD heeft niet mijn voorkeur voor mappen. De ervaren mappers op het forum werken allemaal met JOSM. Simpele zaken doe ik met potlatch2.
In editor id kun je in het linker vak kiezen voor alle tags. en als je op de + klikt komt er een vakje bij en kun je oneway=yes toevoegen.
De richting van de "way" loopt hier toevallig goed.  Zou het de verkeerde kant uitgaan dan kun je het oplossen met oneway=-1   ...of de richting van de weg omkeren. Kan vast ook wel in iD. Even zoeken.
De Dahlia weg heb ik even voor je gesplitst bij het Lodewijk napoleonplein.
Splitsen zou ook wel ergens kunnen.
Probeer eerst die tags erop te krijgen dan kijk ik wel of het goed is.
In het begin lijkt alles moeilijk. 
Probeer je het zelf?
Peter Vojtek (2017-11-13 17:09:43+00:00): dobry den,
chcem sa spytat ci ste nahodou v druhom edite neodstranili prave tie tagy, ktore ste v skutonosti chceli nechat:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3028559662#map=16/48.7940/19.7290&layers=C

aktualne ma dany bod iba tri tagy: addr:streetnumber, internet_access, internet_access:fee, ale zmizli tagy oznacujuce adresu, ci nazov
Camping Sedliacky Dvor (2017-11-13 18:53:04+00:00): good evening, I already mailed to mister Riha the following: (hope that its gonna be fine ....

please could you check on the changes that we made (camping Sedliacky dvor) . First time on this map, and i didnt do things right, sorry. Could you please check in history what tags were good for this adress (hlinik 27) and put it back? New additions are not necessary, everything that is needed is there.

sorry for the "mess" and thank you for your time.

Kind Regards.
Camping Sedliacky Dvor (2017-11-19 16:12:49+00:00): Dobry vecer pan Vojtek, ste rozumeli nas spravu? som chcela nieco vyplnit pre nasu firmu ale som sa uplne pomilila na adresa, byvame na hlinik 7 ale som mala hlinik 27 omilom. Dufajm ze mozete to davat do poriadku?
Som ale teraz videla ze uz niesme na google maps na adresu hlinik 7. Nahodou toto a moj zle "akciu" ma nieco spolocne? tak treba mi vsetke nase udaje na nasu frimu znovu davat? dakujem za vas cas a odpoved.
Monique Smets, Sedliacky Dvor
Peter Vojtek (2017-11-19 17:50:57+00:00): hi Monika,
it seems Jose Riha did not made any additional changes since your previous comment, so I updated the details to fix the previous changes and also added few additional details (e.g. webpage):

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3028559662

please let me know if the values are ok now, or if I should change any of them.
Camping Sedliacky Dvor (2017-11-19 18:20:04+00:00): Hello Peter,
the details are quite good, but i hope they are not refering to the house with the orange dot? because that was the fault i made, its not the right house! this is hlinik 27 and further up the road near the otocka, is our house and firm. sorry for all this! few changes in the details: tourism: camping-ubytovanie  and please website: www.sedliackydvor.com 
Thank you very much. Monika
Peter Vojtek (2017-11-19 18:47:42+00:00): ok. now I start to understand.

so, I removed all the camping related tags from the Hlinik 7 address point:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3028559662#map=19/48.79330/19.72511

and your camping site is here I guess:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356953110#map=17/48.79560/19.72878

I updated it only by adding the internet_access tags.
Camping Sedliacky Dvor (2017-11-19 20:05:05+00:00): Thank you Peter! So our adres is 713/7 and the green square is not needed, because the campsite is much larger than that. so please only a tag on the house. openingtimes are not necessary, (sometimes we change them, at the moment other dates them you write) Could you put on the other house the right tags back? Hlinik 27 (the rest I dont know maybe you find it in the history of the map)
Thank you very, very much, I wish you all the best! Monika
Peter Vojtek (2017-11-19 20:40:22+00:00): Monika, thanks for suggestions.
I turned the wrong house number back to 27.
regarding you campsite, I only removed the opening hours: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356953110#map=17/48.79560/19.72878

as for the shape -- if you have nothing against, it would be better to keep it as an area instead of an point -- actually, if you could find time, it would be nice if you could take a walk along the borders of your campsite with some gps track logging software running in your smartphone, and then provide me the log (ideally in gpx format) and I can update the shape of the area.
Camping Sedliacky Dvor (2017-11-20 06:24:47+00:00): Hello Peter,
I will make an GPX for you today or tomorrow. As for the right details: I searched for the consrcriptionnumber of house 27, it is 2385. Our house has conscriptionnr. 713. (so 2385/27 and 713/7)
Camping Sedliacky Dvor (2017-11-21 09:25:33+00:00): Hello Peter how can I send you the gpx file? and i want to show you something on a photo too, maybe you send me you emailadres?
Tahnk you
wambacher (2017-11-13 23:11:39+00:00): Hi, you are deleting all members (ways) from existing boundary relations and then you create a new one with all those members again? What is the reason?

And if you want to delete old relations, please remove them completly. there are allways relations with 0 (zero) members, and that is not good.

btw: after working with osm nearly 4 years, you should know that you have to add meaningfull comments to changesets. 

otherwise you will be blocked by the Data Working Group (DWG)

walter
wambacher (2017-11-13 23:22:26+00:00): see: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1082-countries-compare-2017-11-13
https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1081-countries-compare-2017-11-12

fixed:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53725467
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53755031
SimonPoole (2017-11-13 12:54:48+00:00): This changeset damaged the boundary for the municipality of La Chaux-de-Fonds. THe problem has been fixed, but please be careful when editing.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-12 20:03:15+00:00): ddx_del: 1
ddx_nothing: 0
dxd_create: 5
dxx_update: 0
xdd_nothing: 0
xdx_delete: 16
xxd_create: 2
xxd_nothing: 2
xxx_update: 27536
update: 27536
update_touched: 0
update_not_touched: 27536
update_distanceTooFar_skipped: 0
update_distanceTooFar_ignored: 0
create: 7
del: 17
nothing: 2
touched: 24
total_newGTFS: 27545
total_oldGTFS: 27556
total_OsmBeforeRun: 27553
total_OsmAfterRun: 27543
New file download date (IDT): 2017-11-12_212149_Sun
Old file download date (IDT): 2017-11-09_215746_Thu
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-12 20:03:53+00:00): All consequent automatic GTFS updates will be performed from SafwatHalaby_Bots.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-12 20:04:02+00:00): SafwatHalaby_Bot
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-18 06:51:40+00:00): Czym jest https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540058813 ? Nie ma ten obszar podanego znaczenia, na zdjęciach lotniczych nic nie widać.

Przy okazji - proszę, używaj sensownych opisów zmian - "aaa" nie pomaga.
Minh Nguyen (2017-11-12 20:09:41+00:00): Stale changeset comment. The real comment should’ve been: Added sidewalks #osmus-project-127 #c4sj #South-Bay-OSM
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:17:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:17:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:17:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:17:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
user_6110846 (2017-12-14 17:24:00+00:00): Доброго дня   Вітаємо ВАС 

Дана правка скасована повністю 
 Перед тим як змінювати статус дороги потрібно прочитати правила котрі стосується нюансів України
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна/Класифікація_доріг
 а також консультуватися на форумі forum.openstreetmap.org  -Ukraine та прочитати форум за 3 роки а дже по багатьом дорогам було окреме обговорення та дискусія

Прохання зареєструйтеся на форумі і задавайте питання . Спілкування на форумі українська  російська 
англійська
dirtdad (2017-11-14 21:05:58+00:00): There are 4 changes here. 3 are marked no trespassing, and one of them is a trail that should be added.
wislander (2019-07-22 04:01:38+00:00): Hi sctrojan79, I saw that after another user  expanded abbreviations on public transit stops around Seattle, you re-abbreviated them in changesets like this one. Is there a different convention for [abbreviation](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29) in public transport than there is for highways?
sctrojan79 (2019-07-30 20:59:32+00:00): Hey wislander,
I've been importing the stop names from the King County GTFS Feed (https://metro.kingcounty.gov/GTFS/), which abbreviates them.  I was aware of the abbreviation conventions for street names, but wasn't aware it applied to public transit objects!  I'll look into expanding the abbreviations in future imports, thanks!
naoliv (2017-11-12 21:51:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 53443248, 53443311, 53443337, 53468909, 53468952, 53469026, 53469038, 53469053, 53500789, 53500952, 53501100, 53501118, 53501644, 53501651, 53501658, 53501665, 53501685, 53501688, 53501691, 53501701, 53501707, 53501711, 53501715, 53501760.
Supaplex (2018-01-21 05:03:12+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
literan (2017-11-13 13:10:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Тег service=parking_aisle используется исключительно для проездов на парковках (т.е. не предназначенных для чего-либо еще, например, подъезда к домам и т.п.). Здесь я этот тег уберу.
JJIglesias (2017-11-13 02:25:19+00:00): El area es un Predio place=plot, NO es un building=house; el Predio puede abarcar una casa y otras edificaciones. Pero SIGUE siendo un Predio que es una Propiedad Privada. Cambiarlos a House es INCORRECTO; por favor vuelve a ponerlos como place=plot y luego agrega los POI q sean pertinentes. Gracias
Baloo Uriza (2017-11-14 20:53:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53783207 where the changeset comment is: This area is still under construction.
Baloo Uriza (2017-11-12 22:34:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53725257 where the changeset comment is: Incorrectly marked no longer under construction.
paulmach (2017-11-27 17:08:11+00:00): This changeset added the same park twice with slightly different geometry.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540072323
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540072324
3vivekb (2017-11-27 18:28:06+00:00): Well that's super weird.  I'll look into it tonight.  Thanks for noticing.  If you have an easy fix feel free.