piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Diacritic (2021-12-09 00:28:55+00:00): Thank you for the reply.

I understand your reasoning behind relocating the split, but I believe you have misapplied some of the logic from the wiki's you've quoted.

I'm referring to the Editing Standards and Conventions wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways.

"A divided highway is any highway were traffic flows are physically separated by a barrier."

A solid white line is not enough to justify splitting the way: if it were then logically you could separate every lane where lane changes are prohibited. This legal separation is best represented with the change: key.

In regards to traffic lights, we are both aligned with the understanding that traffic lights do not represent the physical location of the lights. My objection to this modelling is because there is a single contiguous stop line for all lanes heading north, and both set of lights have both the turn arrows and green light. Even though the pedestrian crossing is further into the intersection, the traffic light for the left turn seems no different than a separate turn signal to turn right, which is modelled with a single node.

Lastly, I feel the use of the motorway_junction is inappropriate. Punt Road is not a motorway, and this turnoff is not a numbered or names junction that would justify usage of the tag. Again, we don't use junctions on every slip lane. There does seem to be some contradiction between motorway_junction and the rest of the wiki; it doesn't seem to have been updated as heavily as other pages. Notwithstanding the status of the wiki page, the hatched areas in motorways are significantly wider than this example; probably wide enough to arguably be "physically separated". The having here is maybe, a metre or so? I don't believe that's enough to justify a "motorway_junction" node.

I'm happy to discuss further. I'm aware this is comparatively minor and may seem like quibbling, but a lot of the network analysis tasks that use OSM data rely on consistent modelling that distinguishes between "legal" and "physical" separation.
MapAbility (2021-12-09 06:22:34+00:00): I know what you mean about the junction, I haven't used it much although I have seen it used on a few highways, freeways and different major roads. 
I was just trying to make it clearer for navigation as the junction can get very congested and you’ll never get across those lanes without enough warning. I also understand you can’t split every road that has a solid white line as it’s impractical but this is a primary link between a trunk road and a primary road.
Diacritic (2021-12-09 10:02:11+00:00): I certainly won't argue with you regarding the congestion at the intersection! :)

I can appreciate that drivers approaching this intersection would need advance warning to be in the left-most lane.  It's always busy at this intersection, but if you are trying to warn a driver to stay left, even where you've moved the node wouldn't be early enough; they really need to be in the left lane well before Olympic Boulevard!

I happened to raise this issue on the talk-au mailing list and was told that this method of moving the "split" node earlier was a common way of modelling intersections some time ago to achieve the "early turn warning", but newer tags such as destination, turn, change, etc are being used by routing software to give better directions, rather than us mappers trying to estimate where is most appropriate.

You can see the tags I've placed on Punt Road northbound (976172874) include lane-specific destinations, so that lane assistance within routing software should be able to tell well in advance which lane the driver should be in. :)
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:39:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key!!
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114697631
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:41:05+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114697762
eggie (2021-12-08 11:32:49+00:00): Hier dus ook residential en de oude specificatie construction = residential (de aanwijzing wat het moet worden)  verwijderen.
confusedbuffalo (2021-12-11 18:09:42+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these, make sure you put spaces in the postcodes in future, I've fixed that here though.
jmty8 (2021-12-08 11:22:56+00:00): wrong comment, my bad. Fixed geometry and connectivity.
freeExec (2021-12-20 16:48:35+00:00): Зачем?
Felis Pimeja (2021-12-22 20:32:24+00:00): Единообразие. Не смотря на то, что эту рекомендацию начали депрекейтить, это всё ещё общая практика. Снесём когда окончательно затвердим, что это такой же пережиток как и is_in
eggie (2021-12-08 13:00:38+00:00): Tip Zet nooit een barrier=bollard (paaltje)  op een kruising van wegen.. want dan routeert het ook niet meer op de doorgaande weg. Ik heb het paaltje verplaatst naar het fietspad. 
Van het fietspad Bramzeil heb ik construction=residential verwijderd.


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114699239
Gr eggie
Enock4seth (2022-11-05 17:32:31+00:00): Hi Kwadwo, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for mapping, unfortunately mapping unconnected ways as you did here is useless in OpenStreetMap and to everyone. A good question to ask yourself is how will a vehicle connect to this from where?

Start from an area around you where you can map or update missing features you know about.
See how we map https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map and Beginner's guide https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
hebolz (2022-06-25 21:24:25+00:00): Hello UNGSC-mpicaro, i have a question concerning way 1010199439 and the connected highways. It seems that you changed the classification of one continuous highway according to the respective landuse. in this case, you changed between track and residential. This is unusual, i have not seen this before. Is this a generally accepted concept? And where is it described?
eggie (2021-12-08 12:42:45+00:00): Waar je de crossings hebt weggehaald heb ik wel weer verbindingsnodes gemaakt
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
OSM maakt geen onderscheid tussen unclassified en residential.
De router (kaartenmaker)  kan er evt wel iets mee. 
Gele wegen zie ik niet?
Die zijn op de standaardkaart de secondary roads. 
De doorgaande ontsluitingswegen in een wijkje zijn vaak tertiary (Ook wit, maar iets dikker)  Daar houdt de routering dan rekening mee. 

Wellicht heb je hier iets aan.
Nederlandse wiki wegentagging 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging
eggie (2021-12-08 12:45:08+00:00): Denk dat alle wegen waar woningen langs liggen in deze wijk residential zijn.
eggie (2021-12-08 12:18:06+00:00): Tip motor_vehicle zit al ingebakken in een paaltje. Dus niet taggen. Wel mofa en moped=yes om die te laten passeren.
MVG
eggie
WoSoe (2021-12-08 14:21:08+00:00): Hallo Dennis,

ist jetzt einfacher, aber in dem Bereich hat einmal jemand relativ viel Arbeit investiert (siehe Links unten), damit das eben möglichst detailliert ist.

Meiner Meinung nach hätte man das nicht anfassen müssen bzw. müsste man noch mal nachbessern.
Jetzt hängen z. B. zwei Fußgängerampeln in der Luft.

Gruß
WoSoe

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=32657759
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=32808359
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=33331338
eggie (2021-12-08 13:55:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Beter niet BING gebruiken als achtergrond..  Achterhaald en ligt verschoven. Beter de PDOK actueel gebruiken.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
justin5822 (2021-12-20 20:09:30+00:00): It looks like this changeset has duplicated some parts of 231
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:34:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key !!
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114700826
wkdgs (2021-12-09 09:48:33+00:00): Hi,

wenn du die Antwort zu einer Aufgabe nicht finden kannst, solltest du das per "Weitere Antworten" und dann "Nicht beantwortbar" angeben.

Aktuell sieht es so aus als wäre der Name des Kiosks "Unbekannt". Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass das nicht stimmt und entferne den Namen wieder.

Gruß
winkeldings
mapuit (2021-12-08 14:15:55+00:00): Hi bastibay,
you deleted the changed made by wobi9000 with the tags #wikidata4aldi #maproulette #taggingIssue. I totally agree to you that the Aldi has its one building is not located in the engine shelter. However, you also ignored the changes and additions made by wobi9000 about opening times and other useful tags. If would be a rather nicer style to communicate with the changeset discussion instead of deleting and mapping again if you disagree in any changes. You find the changeset discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114633209
All the best,
mapvid
bastibay (2021-12-08 15:02:36+00:00): Hallo mapvid,
ich habe den Tag mit den Aldi-Daten nicht gelöscht, sondern von der falschen Zuordnung (Tunnelstraße 13) auf Tunnelstraße 11 verschoben, so, wie es richtig ist.
Greetings bastbay
mapuit (2021-12-09 21:03:42+00:00): Hey bastibay,
nach deiner weiten Korrektur, bei der du wobi9000 korrekte Änderungen mit übernommen hast, passt es jetzt. Danke dir!
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-09 03:04:57+00:00): Hello, this changeset reverted a river area to the tag waterway=riverbank, which is no longer used by the US mapping community.  Kindly tag river areas natural=water + water=river
BCNorwich (2021-12-09 09:18:48+00:00): Hi, I just wanted to point out that you've, quite likely inadvertently, placed a footpath, Way: 1010211240 on top of the existing highway Way: 367825101. Thus making for duplication of a highway. It's the same situation with footpath Way: 1010211243.

I've removed the two duplicating highways and amended the existing highway to suit your new data. 

Regards Bernard.
DanGregory (2021-12-09 10:57:08+00:00): Hi Bernard, yes, my mistake. Much appreciated, cheers. 

DG
eggie (2021-12-08 14:14:24+00:00): Er wordt door twee mappers tegelijkertijd aan deze haven gewerkt?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114699728
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114699728

Of is dit hetzelfde account?

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-12-08 12:39:24+00:00): That was moved from a dodgy "ourairports.com" import location to a more accurate one, likely based on Google Maps (with an odd "ref=Google Maps" tag).  However, Bing imagery confirms the current location as being correct.  
There's no valid source of the ICAO code though.  Wikipedia isn't a valid source for OSM, and none of the English wikipedia articles primary sources are either.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-08 14:24:28+00:00): Hello Martino,
If the name in Italian is "Bocchetta del Nebbione", then "name:it" would be the correct tag.
However, if the problem is distinguishing between "Swiss Italian" and "Italian Italian" then you might want to consider something like the name tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/267762522 - that has two English language names on it, one "name:en_GB" and one "name:en_IE".
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-12-08 14:25:13+00:00): Ciao Martino,
Se il nome in italiano è "Bocchetta del Nebbione", allora "name:it" sarebbe il tag corretto.
Tuttavia, se il problema è distinguere tra "italiano svizzero" e "italiano italiano", potresti prendere in considerazione qualcosa come i tag del nome su https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/267762522 - che ha due nomi in lingua inglese su it, un "name:en_GB" e un "name:en_IE".
Distinti saluti,
Andy
user_10901495 (2021-12-08 18:45:37+00:00): I don't want to distinguish between anything. The most common way to call this saddle is Nebion, which is a bit localish name, as it happens with many italian places. Swiss italian and Italy italian are the same. The only difference is in the keyboard layout on computers I think.
This situation is an italian specificity, often the most common name of a place is the local name, and so the translation in italian is different. The problem is that Osmose doesn't know that, so we can either pointing out that problem to the develepor team of it or use a workaround like the one that I used here. For brevity I decided to take the shortcut, but maybe is better if we resolve this problem to the root.
user_10901495 (2021-12-08 18:48:00+00:00): You shouldn't bother however to translate your messages, I know english well enough.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-08 18:52:51+00:00): > You shouldn't bother however to translate
I know you do - but the casual local mapper in the area might not.  It's just a courtesy to them really, to save people having to cut and paste into an only translator, which can be a pain, especially on mobile.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-08 19:10:02+00:00): "s/only/online", obviously (I can't even type on a regular keyboard, never mind a phone!)
ivanbranco (2021-12-08 21:05:48+00:00): My two cents:	
name=Bocchetta del Nebion
alt_name=Bocchetta del Nebbione
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114701858
user_10901495 (2021-12-08 21:35:17+00:00): Could be better
user_10901495 (2021-12-08 21:36:05+00:00): But the note solution indicates that the name is italian.
ivanbranco (2021-12-08 21:43:25+00:00): Yes but note=* values are used to communicate something to other fellow mappers, this information doesn't reach the final user.

I would use:
name=Bocchetta del Nebion
alt_name=Bocchetta del Nebbione

or 

loc_name=Bocchetta del Nebion
name=Bocchetta del Nebbione

or restore

name=Bocchetta del Nebion
name:it=Bocchetta del Nebbione 
and then flag the Osmose issue as "false positive", Osmose isn't always right and we should not change correct tagging to please Osmose (in my opinion), especially when we have lot of different "naming tags" to choose from :)
user_10901495 (2021-12-09 05:42:40+00:00): <name=Bocchetta del Nebion
<name:it=Bocchetta del Nebbione
<and then flag the Osmose issue as "false positive", Osmose isn't always right and we should not <change correct tagging to please Osmose (in my opinion), especially when we have lot of <different "naming tags" to choose from :)

I thought the same thing, for me is optimal if we do so.
user_10901495 (2021-12-09 05:43:47+00:00): I was writing it in my first comment but then I reformulated to reporting it to the developer team.
redd (2022-08-14 21:07:35+00:00): Hi Safrano,
thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. Can you please have a look again on your change on building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888089683. 
You may have also a look on the lifecycle prefix https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:*.
Thanks,
redd
marczoutendijk (2021-12-08 12:58:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 111918766, 111918923, 114409941, 114409991, 114459915, 114460033, 114460083, 114460356, 114460451, 114696355, 114696542, 114696724, 114699848.
ftcat (2021-12-09 05:39:03+00:00): Hi Biker69,

I have a copy of the Government wildlife act so am editing the boundaries of the parks as per the act so may be changing them slightly where I find they are wrong. Just to let you know. Also have the Roads act so will be editing road references etc so these may also change. Many mappers use Google for this but I have found Google to be wrong in a number of places. I have found Maxar to be the most up to date imagery, in JOSM at least, not sure if ID has same versions.
Biker69 (2021-12-09 09:34:03+00:00): Hi,

good to know as I started to work at the Kafue Park. 

Mid of 2021 I switched from Windows to MAC. JOSM is not available and I kept using the standard editor. Based on your message I found JOSM is called "Go Map!" on MAC and there I do have the MAXAR maps. Just the standard MAXAR maps as there is a professional MAXAR at cost available.
ftcat (2021-12-09 11:03:26+00:00): Hi,

I have compared Maxar standard and premium and standard is several years out of date at least 4 but I would think even more. It is one of the problems of mapping in Africa unfortunately. Premium, which is free in JOSM, is possibly less than a year out of date in parts of Zambia but not everywhere
kmpoppe (2022-08-23 13:14:43+00:00): Hi!
You entered a value into the mapillary key (a link) that doesn't seem to make sense in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9320976835 as it's not a valid mapillary ID.
Please check if you wanted to enter somethin else there.
Thank you!
Kai
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
eggie (2021-12-08 13:49:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:37:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
The tagging of your buildings are not as required for HOTOSM projects. Do not tag a building as house. Just tag it as buildin=yes
Please pay attention on these points:


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114704753
SekeRob (2021-12-08 14:10:19+00:00): SSW it was.
Frans S (2021-12-29 10:50:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114705023
GSF1200S (2024-11-20 15:08:28+00:00): 骏鹏汽车销售服务有限公司开在镇政府大楼里了 =)
Greg_Rose (2021-12-08 22:54:23+00:00): Why on earth have you changed all roads in Pachaug SP to emergency-access service roads? The public can drive on most of those roads - they're not just open to emergency vehicles!
jnighan (2021-12-08 23:05:05+00:00): Hi, Greg, I also added the tag access=yes. However, you're right--that tag has a narrower meaning than I thought. I'll remove it and leave them as highway=service. Do you agree with that?
Greg_Rose (2021-12-08 23:15:14+00:00): No - since they can be used as through roads, they should go back to unclassified road as they were before, otherwise routing will fail on them. (Most routers won't route over any kind of service road)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-01 17:23:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150175368/history - is it still under construction?
Felipe Alves (2021-12-08 18:01:16+00:00): Oi, Diego. Tudo bem?
A ciclovia da Aguanambi já estava mapeada, com etiquetas junto as linhas da própria avenida. Se for substituir por este traçado com uma linha separada, precisaria remover as etiquetas da avenida, e fazer todas as conexões nos cruzamentos, início e fim.
Fico à disposição para quaisquer dúvidas.
Abs
user_10714872 (2021-12-09 03:08:52+00:00): 美国的华莱士
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:46:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
This is valid for your other changesets till now.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114707918
Warin61 (2022-01-20 05:54:31+00:00): Tagging buildings as amenity=hospital is not correct. They are buildings, so building=hospital.
Warin61 (2023-11-14 23:21:55+00:00): Hi
What is the source of this population?
Tommybara (2021-12-08 16:02:08+00:00): Đề nghị bạn bớt "nâng cấp" đường vô tội vạ lại.

Các tuyến đường đô thị, phần lớn cao nhất chỉ có thể là đến tertiary là cùng nhé. Chỉ có những đường có tuyến xe bus đi qua thì mới để lên secondary. Riêng đường Hồ Thị Hương do nó có thể là một lộ trình thay thế để cắt ngắn bớt 1 đoạn Quốc lộ 1A nên là primary (cái này chỉ là tạm thời vì sau này khi đường tránh TP Long Khánh xây dựng rồi đường này cũng sẽ bị hạ xuống thành tertiary thôi).

Đề nghị bạn hãy tìm hiểu cho thật kĩ, không chỉnh sửa lung tung. Một lần nữa tôi sẽ đưa bạn ra cộng đồng để mọi người xem xét đấy.