piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2017-01-05 12:20:26+00:00): Otagowałem logicznie i zgodnie z wiki. Nazwa jest polska, bo ulica jest w Polsce. A nazwa dla domów na południu jest w name:left.
Podwójna nazwa ulicy byłaby dobra, gdyby taka była zastosowana w terenie, czyli widniała na tabliczkach. Ale tak przecież nie jest.
maraf24 (2017-01-05 12:25:41+00:00): I problemem nie są mrówki, ale też Nominatim i Osmand.
A ulica Dolní też jest - na zachodzie. Zapewne na tej podstawie te budynki czeskie mają ją w adresach.
W każdym razie tak to działa w Polsce - budynki mają adresy od najbliższej ulicy, a nie nie ulica od adresów w budynkach.
Endres Pelka (2017-01-28 20:58:04+00:00): Sprawdziłem w Geoportalu: według danych Państwowego Rejestru Granic, granica przebiega dokładnie środkiem tej drogi... I co z tym teraz zrobić?
http://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/imap/imgp/genmap?objectid=2962200&token=U5HKPHNzxhto6U8XOl_2LG34D3V8UpuG0ztWJcpzLuflEWunuO6NyRaxxI24GJxjATVEq7Z5Hiv8AcY-XzSYTQ..
maraf24 (2017-01-29 15:42:29+00:00): Czyli granica w OSM jest błędnie poprowadzona?
Sprawdzę to jeszcze na danych wprost z CODGiKu.
Jeśli faktycznie tak jest, to trzeba by wrócić do poprzedniej nazwy oraz użyć name:left i name:right.
maraf24 (2017-03-10 17:04:30+00:00): Poprawiłem granicę i przywróciłem podwójną nazwę.
jaap de vries (2017-01-12 09:58:10+00:00): Waar heb je de tijdelijke parkeerplaats gelaten? En waarom heb je de rest van het kasteeltuin niet getagd als park? Nu heb je weer alleen de grasmat veranderd.
lostmike (2016-12-23 10:51:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
Is that bridleway really called "Street Path"? Odd name and an odd place for a bridleway.
jaap de vries (2017-01-12 09:47:03+00:00): Weet je zeker dat dit een park naast de Muts (ouderenflat) is? Staat niet als park bekend bij de gemeente he.
jaap de vries (2017-01-12 09:43:28+00:00): Weet je zeker dat dit een park is en geen voetbal veld met JOP?
Nu heb je het als een park getagd.....
jaap de vries (2017-01-12 09:47:54+00:00): Waarom heb je de andere delen niet als park aangemerkt en deze delen wel?
jaap de vries (2017-01-12 09:50:05+00:00): waarom heb je hier een park van gemaakt en waar is de skatepleintje gebleven?
Myazyk (2016-12-23 18:47:00+00:00): Не розумію нащо ти ті три хати прив'язав до Залужанської вулиці
olehz (2016-12-24 13:09:09+00:00): це я вже нічого не розумію. можеш чітко сказати це Орлика чи Залужанська?
Myazyk (2016-12-25 21:39:36+00:00): Говорив я про ті хати з листоношею - вона сказала, що вони відносяться до Залужанської. Тепер у ЛОЕ побачив, що це Орлика. На паркані у деяких з хат теж є номер вулиці Орлика. От я і виправив після твого повідомлення мені і тобі написав, що я виправив. А виправив я, відв'язавши від вул Залужанської. А ти на наступний день знову прив'язав до тієї вулиці, залишивши зв'язок і до вул. Орлика.
Тепер зрозуміло?
jaap de vries (2017-01-12 09:44:33+00:00): Waarom heb je dit veranderd in park?
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 13:03:38+00:00): Reviewed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44675633
Commodoortje (2017-02-08 08:37:20+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-02-08 08:43:20+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80348269
https://www.dropbox.com/s/c9d1hny1af00kio/2017-02-08_09-39-10.png?raw=1

Je wijzigt bovenstaande polygon van grass naar park. Dit lijkt een zg. Pokemon edit. 
Je edits zullen gecontroleerd worden, om zo vervuiling in de OSM database te corrigeren.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57150
aceman444 (2017-05-08 20:11:58+00:00): Dobry den, Google Maps (Vas pridany source=) sa nesmu pouzivat na zadavanie akychkolvek udajov do OpenStreetMap. Okrem toho neviem, co ste vlastne pridali, ked tam uz vsetky informacie o autoservise boli. No dam to do poriadku.
aceman444 (2020-11-05 19:47:10+00:00): Zdravim, neposuvajte prosim budovy so znackou source=kapor2. Su importovane z katastra a su umiestnene lepsie, ako to mozete obkreslit z rozmazaneho Bingu. Posunutie domu 1497 o 10 metrov tu bolo uplne zbytocne.
FTA (2016-12-23 19:00:16+00:00): Hey C! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Glad to have another mapper in the Madison area :). If you run into any problems or have a question about the project, don't hesitate to shoot me a message.
Happy Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA
Chetan_Gowda (2016-12-23 13:19:16+00:00): Fixed the paths.
jc86035 (2016-12-23 14:02:07+00:00): Hi, you seem to have accidentally deleted a hospital and done various other weird things, please don't do that. Also, you shouldn't be labelling shops with highway tags; and you may want to use shop=furniture instead of shop=showroom because the latter isn't a documented value.
jc86035 (2016-12-23 14:04:27+00:00): I've reverted your changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44621364), although I've added the shop back with proper tagging.
richlv (2016-12-23 15:47:40+00:00): this bench seems a bit suspect - where is it located ?
BCNorwich (2016-12-23 16:44:20+00:00): Outline of park area is mapped, no need for a POI
SomeoneElse (2016-12-30 19:25:43+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add the Arabic for "cafe" as a "name" to places such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4568623592 .  If it has an Arabic name then by all means add it; but if it doesn't, please don't.
Also - is it perhaps a duplicate of the "Carpo" next door?
Best Regards,
Andy
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:54:45+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
rudychung (2016-12-28 01:35:58+00:00): Welcome, Lee Lin san!  :D
santamariense (2016-12-23 14:12:17+00:00): Procure sempre apagar os testes que fizer durante o seu aprendizado no OSM o mais breve possível. Eles podem atrapalhar de diversas maneiras. Bem vindo ao OSM.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-30 19:26:53+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4568639094#map=20/51.49884/-0.16572&layers=H really a separate restaurant or perhaps a duplicate of the bistro next door?
Fod (2016-12-31 14:15:25+00:00): Hej Lytter1
I min iver efter at mappe gamel jernbanespor, er jeg bange for, at jeg har gen-mappet et spor, som du for nylig har slettet tæt på Dalumvej 116. Vil du checke?
Venligst,
Jakob
Fod (2016-12-31 14:16:01+00:00): ...og skal broen over Odense Å ikke mappes med "bridge=yes"?
Hjart (2016-12-31 15:37:24+00:00): Netop derfor kan det være en rigtig god, så længe objekter stadig er synlige på aktuelle luftfotos, ikke direkte at slette dem, men blot at foranstille et "demolished:", sådan som jeg har gjort med f.eks. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266773399
Lytter1 (2017-01-01 16:03:52+00:00): Disse spor som fører ind til fabrikken er pillet op, og ja kan godt følge jer i at der er endnu spor efter optagningen, men i selve området  fra Åen og ind mod fabrikken er sporene helt slettet og man er i gang med at skulle opføre nye bygninger på stedet. Så jeg har markeret det resterende bane som 'abandoned', indtil de omlægger en del af den til et stisystem mod syd til fodboldbanen.
Fod (2017-01-01 18:22:29+00:00): Hej igen -

Tak.

Hvis sporet stadig er der, skal det markeres med "railway=disused" (også selv om sporet ikke bliver brugt.

Hvis sporet er taget op, men man kan ane, hvor det ar gået, skal det markeres med "railway=abandoned".

(Jeg måtte selv korrigere et par redigeringer, efter jeg fandt ud af definitionen... Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway )

/Jakob
lostmike (2016-12-23 12:46:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM

You appear to have created a park, a footpath and a lake where there was once houses and gardens. Is this accidental or have these gardens been demolished for the purpose?
BCNorwich (2016-12-24 07:29:55+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The OSM database is a live worldwide operation from which folk compile maps for you and I to use. So it's not a good thing to place fiction here. There are sites where you can make up your own fantasy maps but this is not one of them.
I can find no official evidence of this park existing so can only assume it is a fiction. Anything added to OSM must be verifiable on the ground for all to see. Please could you show/explain the reason for adding these features to the map.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2017-01-10 10:59:19+00:00): No response from StarsMmd so reverted as could find no evidence in favour of the edit.
wwwFrank (2016-12-26 10:31:19+00:00): Ist "Roter Weg" ein offizieller Name von einem Straßenschild? Oder selbst ausgedacht?
Die Anführungszeichen und der voran gestellte "Mühlenbrink" ausserhalb der Anführungszeichen sind auf alle Fälle falsch.
Warum werden eigentlich so nah zusammen liegende Änderungen alle in getrennten Änderungssätzen hoch geladen?
santamariense (2016-12-23 14:09:09+00:00): Para cursos d'água intermitentes adicione a tag intermittent=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:intermittent)
kjon (2016-12-23 23:23:37+00:00): hi wdyqust. what feature do you want to map? 
highway=rest_area is rather used alongside a motorway or similar. please check
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area an correct your tagging.
Philipp_Sto (2019-08-17 09:15:14+00:00): Sorry for reopening this, but the rest_area tag is still present in OSM and seems rather out of place. Are there any objections to deleting it?
wwwFrank (2016-12-26 10:26:50+00:00): "Gartenanlage" ist kein "Name".
Das ist die Art der Fläche und die ergibt sich ja schon aus dem Landuse-Eintrag.
Ein normaler Hausgarten ist üblicher Bestandteil eines Wohngebietes und braucht nicht gesondert eingetragen werden. Nur wenn es irgendwie besonders oder prägend ist.
lostmike (2016-12-23 13:07:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

I see no houses in the residential area you created. Is this a new or planned development?
midwich (2016-12-23 15:30:26+00:00): Look towards the bottom of that box - I live there myself together with a number of other houses. I don't know if these things are typically named, but collectively that box is known as 'Wiganthorpe' .
Commodoortje (2016-12-28 10:07:09+00:00): Dubbel segment op dit stukje
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/831466
kreuzschnabel (2020-03-07 16:57:08+00:00): Welchen Sinn hat es, diese „wichtige Wanderstrecke“ für jeglichen KFZ-Verkehr freizugeben (motor_vehicle=yes), aber für Fahrräder zu sperren?
TourenbikerFKB (2020-03-08 10:38:58+00:00): Der Mapper ist anscheinend seit drei Jahren nicht mehr aktiv und ich fürchte deshalb, dass er uns eine Antwort schuldig bleibt. Auf Luftbildern sehen diese Wegstücke wie ganz normale Feldwege (track) aus, von grade1 (ein kurzes Stück ab der Kreisstraße) bis grade5.
kreuzschnabel (2020-03-08 11:08:42+00:00): Ich teile deine Befürchtung, viel gemacht hat er ja auch nicht. Aber ich versuch’s zuerst immer mal, bevor ich vom Sessel aus was ändere. Manchmal ist ja was Spezielles gemeint und wurde nur aus Unkenntnis in falsches Tagging umgesetzt.
wwwFrank (2016-12-26 10:23:04+00:00): Ein Natur-Reservat auf einer Weide?
Den Tag "leisure_1" gibt es nicht.
Man gibt normalerweise nicht die Namen der Besitzer an. Nur wenn das zum offiziellen Namen einer Einrichtung gehört.
lostmike (2016-12-23 13:42:31+00:00): Is this a public footpath?
andrewwiseman (2016-12-24 02:24:45+00:00): Hello, why did you add these things? They don't exist on satellite imagery. Thanks.
eggie (2017-03-16 21:54:36+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

tegenwoordig sturen wij weer een welkomstmail naar startende mappers... Beter laat dan nooit...

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Rabieluh (2017-03-16 22:04:27+00:00): Bedankt voor je berichtje! Ik was al uitvoerig de helps en wiki's aan het doornemen voor ik wijzigingen aanbreng, heb uiteraard nog veel te leren. Mocht ik vragen hebben dan weet ik je nu te vinden.
mavl (2016-12-27 05:34:56+00:00): Hello. This changeset is partially reverted.
jc86035 (2016-12-23 14:09:22+00:00): I've reverted your edits in this area, because you seem to have messed up the surrounding roads. I haven't added the shop back because it's not clear from the satellite imagery where it's actually supposed to be.
eggie (2017-06-29 10:44:32+00:00): PB alsnog als welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-06-29 10:59:00+00:00): Geen parkedits op deze manier svp. Dit geeft schade aan de kaart.

Leisure park is in de Nederlandse situatie geen grondgebruik. het is een functie..
eggie (2017-06-29 11:10:51+00:00): Ook hier heb je parkedits teruggezet naar de originele 3dshapes
jc86035 (2016-12-23 14:14:22+00:00): Reverted, this can't plausibly be changed to the location of a single shop.
Volker Fröhlich (2019-06-05 16:28:27+00:00): Bitte beim nächsten Mal nicht die Adresse löschen! :)
zors1843 (2016-12-23 14:59:37+00:00): P.M. to user
osmcanada_fix (2016-12-23 14:26:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44622024 where the changeset comment is: Test revert script
richlv (2016-12-23 16:00:15+00:00): hey, a question on these recreational grounds - are there really areas like that ?
please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=recreation%20ground?uselang=en-GB for detail on tagging.

given that this mapping seemed to include much more than necessary (a few buildings etc), i have reverted this changeset for now. please let me know if that was wrong.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-23 16:49:11+00:00): Hello,
You've changed the shop type here from "furniture" to "Showroom".  If you can buy furniture there then I'd suggest "furniture" is the better tag, since nothing will recognise the "Showroom" tag.  Presumably it's your shop and you want people to be able to find it :)
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:55:24+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
ZuluTango1 (2016-12-24 12:21:03+00:00): Hey Pal, I don't read Chinese yet. 
I'm not from here.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-23 16:52:57+00:00): Hi,
I think that something has gone a bit wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404895135/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461376052/history - they have a name and a "source" tag, but nothing else.
What actually are they?
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.  Any other questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Cheers,
Andy
Markcw68 (2016-12-23 14:19:09+00:00): This was not a golf course, sorry.  This is a newly built park
user_3216889 (2017-02-08 16:12:02+00:00): verwijderd!
jc86035 (2016-12-23 14:26:45+00:00): Please stop deleting things unnecessarily.
jc86035 (2016-12-23 14:28:00+00:00): The number of the address does not belong in the addr:street field; it belongs in addr:housenumber.
jc86035 (2016-12-23 14:29:54+00:00): You may want to use the easier iD editor instead, especially given that you appear to have difficulty using Potlatch.
jc86035 (2016-12-23 14:31:04+00:00): …Actually, never mind.
Dave Lambert (2016-12-23 14:38:32+00:00): Neglected to change notes before saving. "Added Germanshire Park" was my previous update to OSM.  This change was about deleting a marker/pointer called "Nolan Lake"/"Nolan Dam," which wasn't pointing to a lake or a dam. As long as I've lived here (17 years now) that spot it was pointing to has been a retail center, with a Big Lots store and a bunch of smaller stores ranging out on either side of Big Lots. And a gas station out front to one side, and a former restaurant (long closed and now turned into an electronics repair store) on the other side. No lake. No dam!  - DAVE
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 07:55:16+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 07:57:24+00:00): Het aangebrachte (grote) gebouw heb ik inmiddels vervangen door BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) gebouwen.
FTA (2016-12-23 18:51:22+00:00): Hi, would it be possible to please separate changes that occur in opposite parts of the world into different changesets? It's hard to monitor changes for a local area if there are wide sweeping changeset bounding boxes spanning much of the globe.
Cheers,
Ethan aka FTA
AlexDRL (2016-12-23 20:44:56+00:00): I thought it was logical to group by task topic in tofix tasks... I won't do it again, and I'll do one change changesets.
bielebog (2018-11-13 13:25:15+00:00): Von dem "Modellflugplatz" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461381057 habe ich bei einer Feldbegehung vor Ort nichts mehr gesehen, mag's aber mangels Ortskenntnis nicht löschen. Da Du den original eingetragen hattest – Kannst Du den ggf. löschen oder falls da doch noch was ist, das an https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmodel_aerodrome anpassen? 

Danke, bielebog
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:56:06+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-12-24 10:00:37+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2016-12-24 07:41:42+00:00): Hello, This path duplicates a way already mapped as a shared cycleway. It adds nothing so should really be removed.
chillly (2016-12-23 15:15:19+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM. You seem to have added a bridleway that is highly unlikely. I suspect you have added the route of a walk, that's not what OSM really wants. We do want the location of a bridleway or footpath, but not the route of a walk that people take. If you want share a route with other people you might like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr
BCNorwich (2016-12-26 14:06:31+00:00): Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've looked at what you've added to the database and see quite a few problems. The Howardian Hills: Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is not just the area you mapped (please see the map here :- http://www.howardianhills.org.uk/about-us/). 
There is no large residential area over the track leading to Wiganthorpe Hall.
The residential area at the hall could be better defined as could the wooded areas.
Are you sure there is pedestrian access down the drive to the hall?
If I can help in any way please just ask, in the meantime I await your response.
manings (2016-12-26 06:12:50+00:00): This edit mentioned pokemongo, but edits seems good.  Need locals to verify.
aceman444 (2019-09-09 18:25:07+00:00): Zdravim, viete tento sad preverit? Uz tri roky je oznceny ako vo vystavbe, na fotkach ZBGIS to ale ako sad nevyzera a stale su tam zakreslene detske ihriska (ktore na ZBGIS uz nie su). Dakujem
t_ja (2019-09-09 19:14:46+00:00): Ahoj, už je to asi hotové: https://www.zilinak.sk/temy/dobsinskeho-sad
Keď pôjdem okolo na bicykli, skúsim pozrieť. Ale tie aktuálne zakreslené detské ihriská už budú určite neaktuálne.
bmk1511 (2017-01-25 14:44:35+00:00): Why did you put down RIT as Marshland?
pxm654 (2017-01-25 15:18:08+00:00): RIT is built on what is (now) Considered protected wetlands/marshlands by the Federal Government. That's one of the primary reasons there is so much red-tape involved whenever they want to develop anything not in the center of the campus. I had heard this in a passing conversation and was able to get some confirmation, although I am not certain the entire are is considered wetlands.

https://books.google.com/books?id=hPyUcREgadYC&pg=PA527&lpg=PA527&dq=rochester+rit+campus+protected+wetlands&source=bl&ots=yRyRd2t7nm&sig=pijTtL2bhqeOpxWGFzZLDdITIsU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj2iNDbyt3RAhWErlQKHQhGDvoQ6AEINDAE#v=onepage&q=rochester%20rit%20campus%20protected%20wetlands&f=false
bmk1511 (2017-01-25 18:55:41+00:00): I was wondering where you got your source from. For future reference, I would go to NLCD database that the federal provides. You are correct, this area is wetland. However, the Army Corps of Engineers does not consider everything to be a wetland. Which is also another reason why RIT hired consultant to determine where specifically the wetlands are currently. 
https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd2011.php
pxm654 (2017-01-25 18:58:49+00:00): Thanks for the heads up. I'm fairly new to OSM so sorry if the change wasn't completely appropriate. I'll take a more granular look at it when I'm back at a PC.
Alecs01 (2016-12-23 18:49:49+00:00): Hola César, toma en cuenta que OpenStreetMap es un mapa colaborativo del mundo real, por favor no vuelvas a añadir cosas cosas como estas, las casas de tus amigos no son hoteles, y no tienen lugar en un mapa del mundo (por lo menos, sin el nombre del dueño).
Johnny Mapperseed (2016-12-27 20:18:32+00:00): Thank you for noting this! It's very helpful! :D
grouper (2016-12-27 00:06:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please don't add bogus features like a giant pier area over a residential area to support pokemon go. Real world improvements to the map are welcome!
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 08:04:47+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-24 08:05:42+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert wegens vandalisme. wegen zijn in werkelijkheid niet aanwezig, Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-26 13:04:07+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44640309
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-23 16:36:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44626504 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some numbered tourist attractions.  See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1125
maus781 (2016-12-23 20:18:18+00:00): Was wurde hier geändert oder zugefügt?