piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JochenB (2020-10-29 22:26:02+00:00): Hallo Rainer,

sorry dass es einige Zeit gedauert hat, muss grad viel arbeiten^und Danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit.

Ich hab meine Erkundnungen bei Mappilary dokumentiert und noch mal nachgeschaut. Wenn mir irgendwo Schilder aufgefallen sind, habe ich sie fotografiert, was aber nicht ausschließt, dass ich eins übersehen habe.

Man kann von vier Stellen auf den Weg kommen (1) bis (4). Von drei Stellen her ging das ohne Schilder, somit ist bycicle=no am Weg selber nicht passend, deswegen habe ich das bicycle = yes wohl entfernt.

(1) Beim Wanderwegweiser nahe des Jungbauernhofs gab es ein Gatter, was geschlossen war, als ich dort vorbeikam. Ich habe jetz das Gatter gemappt mit bicycle=no, da wenn geschlossen von den Maßen her nicht mit Fahrrad passierbar: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/dRDwyXQK6djzvKKmhNwhwn 

(2) Über den Jungbauernhof selber kann man den Weg erreichen, auch da habe ich kein Schild dokumentiert. Hier habe ich nun access=permissive gesetz, da irgendwie als Privatgrundstück erkennbar. Es gab dort einen Weidedrahtzaun, den man aber Öffnen kann und der vermutlich nicht immer dort hängt. Das rechtfertigt aber kein acess=no: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/mlq80o0Wj3xIgec2LaJrg9

(3) Vom Grentschenhof ist mir kein Schild aufgefallen, den Weg bin ich langgelaufen, das hätte ich fototgrafiert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110364694)

(4) Das Schild auf der dritten Seite ist die Bitte "Weidezäune und Kühe, Radfahrer bitte absteigen". Das sollte man netterweise tun, hat rechtlich aber keine Konsequenz (kein Zeichen 250 oder 254). 

Deswegen könnte man trotzdem überlegen, ein bicycle=no zu setzen. Da man aber von anderen Seiten rein kann, eher nicht, oder man müsste man es nur auf eine Fahrtrichtung begrenzen und nur direkt am Schild. Ich habe letzteres getan, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/R0npNzuc0sGlY5deaeWSgH

Ich denke der Bauer mag es nur nicht, wenn Mauntainbiker hier abkürzen und mit Volldampf den Berg runterbrettern.
Irgendwie fehlt ein Tag "Fahrradfahren nicht erwünscht" oder etwas ähnliches. bicycle=dismount passt ja auch nicht.

access=permissive ist meines Erachtens nicht richtig, denn das bedeutet ja, dass die Nutzung eigentlich nicht erlaubt ist, aber geduldet. Bei Feld- und Waldwegen ist in Deutschland die Nutzung durch Radfahrer und Fußgänger standardmäßig erlaubt und nicht nur geduldet. Zudem geht dort offiziell ein Wanderweg lang. 

Für permissive müsste ein Schild stehen "Privatweg, Nutzung auf eigene Gefahr" oder ähnliches" oder es geht durch ein Grundstück, dass klar als Privatgrundstück erkennbart. Das passt für die Hofdurchfahrt des Jungbauernhofs als Privatgrundstück mit Hofladen. Dort hatte ich 'permissive' gelassen bzw. direkt im Hof eben gesetzt.

Grüße,
Jochen
JochenB (2020-10-29 22:28:55+00:00): Ähm Tippfehler, ich hatte bicycle=no entfernm nicht ... = yes
*abq* (2020-10-30 19:18:44+00:00): Hallo Jochen,
die Beschilderung stand oder steht am oberen Wegbeginn, an der Kehre der Forststraße auf etwa 560m Höhe. Der Teil darüber ist problemlos. Soweit ich weiß, ist der Weg auf Privatgelände, und die Beschilderung hatte ihre Gründe (ehemaliger Teil der Downhill-Strecke der MTB WM vor 25 Jahren). Wenn das Schild noch da ist, ist bicycle no oder dismount auf jeden Fall sinnvoll. Wir haben in der Gegend nur wenige tracks, die für Radler gesperrt sind, und alle haben ihre Vorgeschichte ...

VG Reiner
lakedistrict (2020-08-19 17:21:12+00:00): Hello! When did you last visit Bowness? Costa was only closed for the first part of lockdown and has been open again for some time. The 'You and Me' restaurant is already correctly mapped on the other side of the road. These edits will be reverted.
Humus015 (2020-08-19 22:33:38+00:00): Hi, I was there last sunday.  I look well and I did not see any logo at all.  Looks like all the side building became chinese resto. No space for a cafè.  Anyway very strange.
lakedistrict (2020-08-20 17:47:06+00:00): Hi, Costa is on the left of these images and 'You and Me' on the right, on opposite sides of the road: https://openstreetcam.org/details/1524409/104/track-info  https://openstreetcam.org/details/1524409/106/track-info  https://openstreetcam.org/details/1524409/119/track-info
Cyclono (2020-08-22 08:27:02+00:00): hey, those were mostly my edits here :P hope you liked them
jumbanho (2020-08-18 23:28:50+00:00): The boundary multipolygon is broken again. 
What source are you using to map the boundary?

Is Somme Prairie Nature preserve in or out of Northbrook?

Is Somme Prairie Grove in or out of Northbrook?
Is the triangle above Somme Prairie NP and Grove, but below Edens Spur in or out of Northbrook?
Is Glenbrook Countryside in or out of Northbrook?
user_8334278 (2020-08-18 23:31:05+00:00): both
jumbanho (2020-08-18 23:39:13+00:00): both what?  I asked about 4 different areas.  Are there signs that indicate that they are in Northbrook?

This is what I see on Tigerweb and none of those are in Northbrook on it: https://imgur.com/a/itPBSlc
MapMakerGal (2020-08-31 21:39:06+00:00): Buenas, ¿por qué pusiste bahías dentro de la tierra? Para estos nombres mejor un place=locality. Gracias.
Seraq (2020-09-01 11:07:45+00:00): Gracias Iváns....
MapMakerGal (2020-09-01 11:16:30+00:00): Una cosa, ¿de donde sacaste estos datos? Por que no me tiene mucho sentido que un nombre como "Area de Lourido" que quiere decir "Playa" (que por cierto, ya etiquetada, por lo tanto se duplican nombres) se encuentre en el mar y etiquetada como bahía...
DENelson83 (2020-08-19 01:46:57+00:00): Awesome work filling those in!  Thanks for contributing to WikiProject Canada Post, and I hope you can continue to get us closer toward our objective of filling in post offices across the country.
BCNorwich (2020-08-23 07:10:33+00:00): Hi, I tried to contact you in Changeset: 89652784 but had no response. There are many anomalies in your mapping. So I've made a lot of amendments here. Joined paths, aligned paths, removed duplicated paths, removed linear tags from nodes. Over 60 amendments.

Please be aware that some of these paths actually look like service roads.

Regards Bernard
michalfabik (2020-08-21 07:40:27+00:00): Pozdrav i hvala na doprinosu! Kada ucrtavaš kuće, probaj pritisnuti Q (kao sQuare) u editoru kako bi bile pravougaone.
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-20 10:44:46+00:00): Hi, based on the changeset comment and tagging it's been marked as a customer only path which on LPI Imagery and OpenStreetCam appears to exist?
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-20 10:45:05+00:00): https://openstreetcam.org/details/1567561/425/track-info
mapsamillion78 (2020-08-21 00:19:30+00:00): Hi thanks for that - we had received feedback from a member of the public that this walkway between Dickson Lane and Victoria Rd was closed/non-existent, that prompted the update. 

However, it may be that it has been closed (e.g. temporary but long-term) and could use tag [access=no]; and/or the lane does not go all the way through to Dickson Lane? 

Happy to have this put back in if it can be verified.
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-22 07:51:25+00:00): As it was mapped before, it doesn't connect to Dickson Lane, in fact it doesn't connect to Victoria Road (although in the latter case it probably should)
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-30 10:09:14+00:00): Based on a survey today, I've added the path back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91760161 I've connected it to the parking lot so it's more obvious that it doesn't connect to Dickson Lane
BCNorwich (2020-08-23 07:50:01+00:00): Many corrections made here.
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:53:34+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
compdude (2020-08-27 04:37:03+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

In case you weren't aware, the general consensus in the US is that roads should be tagged as highway=trunk if they are a high-speed divided highway with at-grade intersections. (i.e. almost a freeway) This means that I-15 Business should not be tagged as a trunk road as it doesn't meet those requirements.

Please change it back to how it was before, thanks!
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:08:05+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:54:02+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:54:52+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:55:07+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:55:24+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:56:31+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:56:56+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
Coolmato (2020-08-19 01:14:09+00:00): source:local_knowledge
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:57:33+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:57:58+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
WoodWoseWulf (2020-08-19 21:50:32+00:00): Hello edgar77rangel,

Are you able to explain why you have changed this pool back into a lake? It's quite obviously a pool.

You have made other changes that also make no sense including making park borders less accurate. You have also changed features that are accurately tagged into parks, can you please explain these changes?
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:58:53+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
SomeoneElse (2020-08-21 22:36:22+00:00): Hello,
I'm guessing that there's more to this change than just "adding stop_position nodes to Metra stations" as it's a revert and it removed things like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836261452/history which aren't stop position nodes.  Would it be possible to provide a bit more detail?
Best Regards,
Andy
clay_c (2020-08-21 23:23:00+00:00): Hi Andy. As I was reviewing Metra stations to repair stop positions and get things back to a working state, I noticed details were added in the same changesets where the stop positions were deleted. While some of the information was added in good faith and was useful, much of it was complaints about other mappers' opinions. Many of the stop positions that remained undeleted were given a fixme=* or note=* complaining that it was fake. I had a hard time sifting through the good and the bad, and in the interest of adding stop positions back and keeping tags free of interpersonal drama, I reverted them.

I appreciate attempts to add more detail to train stations, especially as public transit mapping and railway mapping in the United States have been gaining ground lately. I invite the author of the changesets complaining about and deleting my work to respectfully join in on the discussion as we continue to develop a tagging scheme for stop positions. He's clearly interested in improving railway data and I feel he could use some guidance from the community. I just wish he wouldn't be so hostile to everyone who bumps into him.
SomeoneElse (2020-08-22 00:11:56+00:00): For completeness - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3850 .
I added that after noticing changeset comments at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C4WKKHH0V ; unrelated to this edit.
Zol87 (2020-08-23 03:24:45+00:00): I'd be more willing to work with him if he was willing to learn the protocols of OSM and willing to explain the reasoning behind his changes instead of being so stubborn. It would also help if he was more descriptive in his changes so we can understand them. The problem is that these changes affect relations for the whole transit line in terms of stop order and visibility of nodes on other sites like OSMAnd (Monthly Updates) or ÖPNVKarte.
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:59:23+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:00:08+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
BCNorwich (2020-08-23 08:43:37+00:00): Corrected a few path problems
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:07:39+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
MikeN (2020-08-19 02:55:48+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!   The turning circle for Crimson Court was accidentally dragged to Batesville road, so I restored it.
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:00:58+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2020-08-24 21:35:54+00:00): Jel https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11518185 "brace jerkovic" ili "milorad medakovic"? U `name` stoji jedno, u `name:sr` stoji drugo?:)
TXBG (2020-08-24 21:39:53+00:00): Jerković, valjda :) Ne znam šta se desilo, video sam da si već ispravio par sličnih mojih grešaka.
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2020-08-24 21:41:39+00:00): Bot nesto ispravlja, ne ja:)

Ko radi, taj i gresi:)
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2020-08-24 21:43:43+00:00): OK, ispravio, milorad je malo istocnije. E, Branko Kokanovic ovde, sad tek vidim da pisem pod botovim nalogom:)
TXBG (2020-08-24 21:49:00+00:00): Kad si podvojena "ličnos"
TXBG (2020-08-24 21:50:54+00:00): Inače i vreme je bilo da pustiš malo botinu, nakupilo se grešaka
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2020-08-24 21:53:51+00:00): tezak slucaj sizofrenije:) Evo polako, ispravljam sta stignem, evo ga izvestaj od juce:
https://openstreetmap.rs/serbian-osm-lint/2020-08-23.html
Sad idem redom (ne moras ti nista da radis za ovo, radi bot, ja kontrolisem), pa cu javim ako mi treba pomoc (za ono sto bot ne zna/ne sme)
TXBG (2020-08-24 21:58:22+00:00): Svaka čast! Kokana za "precednika", mislim bar one NVO kad je budemo formirali :)
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:01:13+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:02:08+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:02:29+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:02:49+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:03:02+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:07:12+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:03:29+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:04:12+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
Dolf Andringa (2021-04-04 09:42:31+00:00): Hello Maning, I am from this area and see your classification of this road as a "secondary road". But secondary roads are always paved, and connecting major towns. This road has large unpaved stretches, even though the road is currently undergoing serious improvement. Most similar roads in the area are usually minor/unclassified roads since they are narrow, very steep, have bad stretches of pavement and don't connect any major towns, only small mountain barangays. I am therefore reclassifying this road. It is very misleading now to map uses since it now looks as the largest road in the wide area, which it most certainly isn't.
maning (2021-04-05 01:38:18+00:00): Hi Dolf Andringa, Please go ahead and reclass the road.  Thank you very much.
mueschel (2020-08-21 08:38:16+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what this area is? It got many contradicting tags and several that are not used in any other place:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838406729#map=18/-19.44450/-43.12098
user_5359 (2020-08-19 04:49:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use in OSM for the keys explicitly British English. For more details have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org. See https://www.osm.org/node/7824739020.
Supaplex (2020-08-19 06:46:17+00:00): 五州戲院在這裡
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420473539
可能需要檢查原始資料的精確度，另外，也得注意授權狀況能否匯入 OSM
Supaplex (2020-08-19 06:48:31+00:00): 臺東鹿野池上渡假村重覆標示了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3439159828
Supaplex (2020-08-19 06:49:10+00:00): 建議使用 openstreetmap.org 的線上編輯器 iD，能夠上傳前檢查編輯上的問題，例如沒有規範的標籤問題
Supaplex (2020-08-19 06:51:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3753367984
池上飯包文化故事館重覆標示了
emvee (2020-09-05 21:55:19+00:00): Ja, inderdaad in NWB en BAG is de naam zonder spatie tussen de Jac. en de P. maar zie http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#source=4694&item=2060&class=19&zoom=17&lat=52.027217&lon=4.695764&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=, nu klopt het niet meer met de addr:street values die volgens mij ook uit BAG komen.

Waar zit de fout?

Groeten,

Martin.
FM2441 (2020-09-08 10:18:39+00:00): Beste Martin,

dank voor je terugkopeling! Wat een handige link heb je mij gestuurd! Daar kan ik mooie dingen mee doen.

Het kan zijn dat de BAG geupdated is. soms merk ik dat in OSM sommige vernieuwingen niet doorkomen. Ik zal de straatnamen in de adressen ook even aanpassen, zodat alles weer klopt. Immers, de BAG geeft het nu aan zonder spatie.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Gerrit.
emvee (2020-09-09 12:37:30+00:00): Ik heb wat verder gekeken en het lijkt erop alsof de beheerders van de NWB/BAR gegevens lijken er soms een zooitje van te maken. Bijv. bij een deel van de huizen langs een straat is Burgemeester voluit geschreven maar bij een ander deel is het afgekort naar Burg.

Het beste zou denk ik zijn een terugmelding te maken maar ik zou moeten uitzoeken hoe dat moet en er tijd voor maken.

Ja, Osmose is mijn favoriete quality assurance tool, ik kijk regelmatig naar de warnings bij mij in de buurt en warnings op objecten die ik als laatste heb gewijzigd, http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/emvee (Je kan emvee wijzigen voor je eigen gebruikersnaam). Let op Osmose heeft false positives en in veel gevallen zijn de dingen die een warning veroorzaken al veroorzaakt door een eerdere iemand die het object heeft gewijzigd.

Groeten,

Martin.
FM2441 (2020-09-11 18:08:02+00:00): Beste Martin, dat klopt. Op ons werk doen we regelamtig een terugmelding. Het is echter wel zo dat sommige OSM-ers afwijken van de BAG, waardoor verschillen ontstaan. Sommige willen niet afkorten. terwijl het officieel wel afgekort is. Bijvoorbeeld: Burg. of Burgemeester.

Groeten Gerrit.

PS. Ik maak veel gebruik van je tip hoor!
RiverBearings (2020-08-20 22:45:46+00:00): Hello sriwijoyosastro, 

I have noticed that you have recently set a great many of important roads to construction around south central Jakarta https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-6.394026/106.784277.  Based on evidence, it looks like the road is open from Sawangan northward: www.openstreetmap.org/way/821899891. Here is a tweet from the tolling company from not long ago including images showing the highway open and in use: https://twitter.com/senkomdesari/status/1296037724814622722  in addition to a video from early July https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjkh9qhxt-g, and Wikipedia also says it’s open https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depok–Antasari_Toll_Road.  It is worth noting that the Maxar imagery available in JOSM is from mid 2019 so it is out of date. 

I went ahead and updated it, let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
RiverBearings
ndm (2020-08-20 19:06:09+00:00): It's a good edit with ESRI clarity - but unfortunately the area is under construction - hence the landuse construction - so Bing is more up to date now (and Maxar too). I'll edit it to match newer imagery.
thadad (2020-08-21 10:08:03+00:00): Hello ndm,

Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have missed checking the latest imagery. Thanks for the quick correction. Going forward, I will verify all the existing tags before making the edits. Always happy to learn from the community
aharvey (2020-08-19 14:01:10+00:00): Hi there, I've made a note to do a ground survey here to check. As has already been mentioned, just because something is mapped in OSM doesn't mean it implies it's public access, many private access features are mapped as access=private. So it's only if the road has been removed that it should be deleted.
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-20 10:58:30+00:00): I've reverted this (changeset 89686302) because of the above as well as the fact that even if they are private and even if they are no longer recognisable as roads, they could still be tagged as paths or other features; and they already have access=private.
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-20 11:58:52+00:00): Also interesting to note that the roads in question also appear on the NSW government's base map and topographic maps which are also public information
Kovoschiz (2020-08-19 08:27:08+00:00): Please don't tag `crossing=marked` and `crossing=unmarked` here. They are confusing and hardly applicable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89604271
Frans S (2020-08-21 10:28:06+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are a bit below par.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
mavl (2020-08-19 14:11:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок поменял значения тегов maxheight с 2.3 на default. Пожалуйста, напишите, какое значение имеется в виду у default?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636360356/history  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82734374/history
ser851 (2020-08-19 14:14:06+00:00): На мосту теперь нет ограничения высоты. Я надеялся, что значение default это под собой и подразумевает
mavl (2020-08-19 14:21:51+00:00): Понятно. Если ограничения нет, то тег ограничения maxheight нужно удалить.
habi (2020-08-24 11:14:57+00:00): Hey.
You keep adding buildings on top of already drawn buildings.
This is *really* unnecessary, please refrain from doing so!