piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
clairedelune (2020-04-13 10:55:23+00:00): Hi Ale_Zena,
Thanks for doing quality checking, but please note that you broke Kibirizi health zone relation through this changeset (just corrected it). Please be extra careful if deleting segments that are members of relations.
All the best.
Truchin (2020-07-06 12:46:43+00:00): Tu es sûr que c'est passé à sens unique. Pour moi ce n'est pas le cas donc j'ai modifié. Bonne continuation
Thomas
rskedgell (2020-04-11 12:10:17+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83396612
SomeoneElse (2020-05-23 13:38:51+00:00): Hello bolle_pally,

Can I ask what the source of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788835482/history was?  The changeset source here says "esri,bing and maxar" but all of those clearly show that there is _not_ a residential road here.
We (OSM's Data Working Group) have received an allegation that you've used Google Maps as a source instead.  If you didn't use Google Maps as a source, what did you use?
If you _did_ use Google Maps then we'll have to revert any potentially Google-sourced data that you've added to OSM as their licence doesn't allow it to be used. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" would of course be a perfectly good source for OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's DAta Working Group.
bolle_pally (2020-05-26 11:15:08+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse,

Thanks for bringing this to me, We are not relaying on Google as per OSM policies.As we can see some entrance here node 3041626339 in Bing imagery, created and connected the road logically. However I have corrected the data as per your suggestion.

Thank You
SomeoneElse (2020-05-26 12:55:18+00:00): Thanks - it looks like there's entrance to the property to the south at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3041626339 but I can't really see anything suggesting a link through.
Best Regards,
Andy
rskedgell (2020-04-11 12:10:29+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83396612
faustopt (2020-05-14 17:28:35+00:00): Stop Messing with other peoples work! I'm the architect of this airport and this edition was made with a blueprint and HiRes satellite imagery! Why do you mess with this? Do you know the airpot? Do you live here?
faustopt (2020-05-14 17:40:42+00:00): Deleted Sidewals, unsymetric buildings, misaligned streets, perfectly angled buildings transformed into children's drawing shapes, straight airport taxiways transformed into curved lines ... in short, this man destroyed a month of work from the original project. What's the idea? I understand the opposite, that is, rude drawings on top of distracted images that are corrected and aligned, now a guy that is distorting what is perfectly aligned? what's the idea? Whats wrong wit you? Please read de terms!
LanusOeste (2020-05-14 21:55:19+00:00): Hi faustopt, thank you for reaching out. 

I was reviewing Maxar Premium Imagery here and found that it was more up-to-date than Bing imagery - which is what you cited for your edits. I did not see any other high-resolution satellite imagery available here. 

My edits were to make the features in this area geospatially consistent with Maxar Premium Imagery with reference to Strava and I did not delete any features here. If there are specific features you’d like me to update I am happy to do so. Otherwise I can revert the changes to your previous alignment if you’d prefer.
faustopt (2020-05-15 02:12:13+00:00): This entire area was edited offline from military satellite images, georeferencing (this is also a military base) and from the airport's modernisation project and this information was imported into JOSM. The Bing TAG is the default and so it was, in other words, this whole area was a REAL mapping and not an interpretation of any distorted satellite image drawn by hand. And I say interpretation because when the editor does not know the ground, he only interprets what he sees in an image. Usually wrongly. This was the case. Why were sidewalks removed? Why are buildings (square or rectangular) represented by shapes with angles other than 90 degrees? Why perfectly straight roads, look like water courses? Just to align with any satellite image? In areas where there is no mapping this makes perfect sense, but in this case this is not the protocol!
I am part of a multidisciplinary team that works across this geographic area at a professional level (GIS - civil and military). This project uses the same information as military maps and was only added to the OSM by request of humanitarian associations, to map this entire area with quality. I am talking about international humanitarian support organizations that use this airport as a base for all of Southern Africa. Basically, your edits compromised the entire project. So YES, I appreciate that you roll back to the previous alignment. Thank you.
LanusOeste (2020-05-15 20:35:18+00:00): Thanks for providing these details about your mapping project, it sounds very interesting. 

I have updated everything to the previous alignment in this changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85280631. 

I appreciate the feedback here since there was no reference to this project or the mentioned resources in the history of these ways.
pio2_122 (2020-04-07 11:28:16+00:00): Wg danych urzędowych w Goleniowie nie ma takiej ulicy jak "Gnojna"... Na podstawie jakiego źródła dodałeś taką nazwę?
Bartek93ZGL (2020-04-07 22:10:21+00:00): Nazwa Gnojna nie jest nazwą urzędową, tylko zwyczajową (potoczną). Nie znam genezy powstania jej (było to w latach 90). Nie będzie tej nazwy w żadnym oficjalnym wykazie, ale można ją znaleźć na BIP-ie Goleniowa, w śród wniosków radnych, mieszkańców itp. Nazwa powszechnie używana w Goleniowie przez mieszkańców.
pio2_122 (2020-04-08 16:18:32+00:00): W takim razie prawidłowy tag to loc_name, nie name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
Bartek93ZGL (2020-04-08 22:09:59+00:00): Poprawiłem
Eberth (2020-04-07 11:58:30+00:00): Die Bahnhofstraße ist hier eine verkehrsberuhigte Zone. Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.4375892&lng=7.8266221&z=17&pKey=YS9wzCCTPReKruTsvx9Q0Q&focus=photo&signs=true&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&x=0.28461292456734155&y=0.49298380057906244&zoom=1
eggie (2020-04-07 11:31:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review:  Je kunt hier nog toevoegen amenity=doctors   Dat levert een symbool op. 
MVG,
Eggie
Verhoeckx (2020-04-07 12:45:33+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Hartstikke bedankt voor de tip!
Ik ga het direct toevoegen!

Met vriendelijke groet,
Jeroen Verhoeckx
Verhoeckx (2020-04-07 12:53:20+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Ik heb de tag amenity=doctors toegevoegd.
Klopt het dat ik hiervoor niet op Save hoef te klikken?

Ik heb dat namelijk niet gedaan maar ondanks dat heeft OSM het wel opgeslagen.

Oke, zo?
eggie (2020-04-07 14:05:31+00:00): Dag Jeroen,
Met editor iD ben ik niet zo bekend. 
Je zult toch echt wel een upload hebben gedaan.. :) amenity=doctors staat erbij. 
Het is dus gelukt. 
Rendering kan heel lang duren bij poi's.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-07 14:11:56+00:00): In deze layer zie je al wel het resultaat.. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.86780/5.82973&layers=H
Verhoeckx (2020-04-07 14:16:16+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Hartstikke bedankt!
Wat wordt er bedoeld met POI?

Thanks,

Jeroen
eggie (2020-04-07 14:52:51+00:00): Afkorting van Point-of-interest  .. De verschillende symbolen. Brievenbus, benzinepomp e.d. 
  .. Je ziet het symbool dan van de huisartsenpraktijk. 
Gr eggie
Verhoeckx (2020-04-07 17:45:54+00:00): Ah, super, het icoontje is te zien!
Hartstikke bedankt voor je hulp!!
Verhoeckx (2020-04-07 17:48:35+00:00): Dat zei ik te snel: het icoontje is nog niet te zien maar dat zal wel vanzelf verschijnen!
eggie (2020-04-07 19:00:46+00:00): Standaardkaart duurt vele uren... humanitarian is het snelst. Geduld :)
mueschel (2020-04-10 08:49:14+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it got a strange 'minecraft' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5769195206

Thanks!
Filip009 (2021-04-30 19:21:46+00:00): Dobrý deň, ste si istý, že toto, čo ste nastavil ako vojenskú oblasť je vojenská oblasť? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101384457
PavolG (2021-04-30 19:31:41+00:00): Ano, je to vojenska strelnica...
Alebo mam vari nespravne info?
Filip009 (2021-04-30 20:19:15+00:00): Je to možné, len to bolo priradené k pôvodnému landuse = meadow a dnes som to spresňoval podľa Ortofotomozaiky SR a nevedel som, či to tam nechať tak, ako bol pôvodný landuse, alebo by to malo byť nejak inak.
Filip009 (2021-05-01 16:52:03+00:00): Dnes som sa tam bol pozrieť, fakt je tam vojenský priestor, len by bolo potrebné zistiť, na akom presnom území sa rozkladá
rskedgell (2020-04-11 12:10:43+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83396612
SomeoneElse (2020-12-12 19:30:06+00:00): Hello,
Just to let you know I've shifted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7375217752 etc. north because it looks offset.   I think you might have used ESRI as the main source here, and you can see that it is offset if you compare the access road on OS OpenData StreetView with it.
Best Regards,
Andy
hvannere (2020-12-14 12:56:57+00:00): Thanks for checking the edits. I had made the edits as per the available imagery. thanks for the improvisation. always happy to learn from the community.
Warin61 (2026-03-02 23:50:52+00:00): Hi,
Should not the interval be on the ferry route relations not on the individual segments? Some segments are used by different routes.. thus could be confusing???
emvee (2020-04-07 18:59:53+00:00): De note is opgelost en daarmee gesloten dus dan maar even zo.

Goed te weten dat dat hek weg is en niet verbazend daar een art 461 bord te vinden. Wel vreemd dat je er van de andere kant op kan komen zonder een art 461 bord tegen te komen, "oneway no access"...

De tegenoverliggende weg heeft ook een art 461 bord maar ook een "Eigen weg" dus die heb ik maar "access=private" gegeven, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7346790

Die wandelroutes ga ik denk ik komende tijd intekenen.
eggie (2020-04-07 20:56:14+00:00): Eigenlijk denk ik ook dat het voor de noordzuidweg geldt. Aan het eind van de weg waren ze van uit de verte gezien ook bezig met "werken". 
Overigens had ik nog wel foot=yes toegevoegd uit pragmatisch oogpunt.
Het is daar overal schipperen.
Het gebied westelijker is de Ambachtsheerlijkheid Cromstrijen..( https://www.stichtingambachtsheerlijkheidcromstrijen.nl/ )  later overgenomen door Amev. Nu worden er zelfs woningen gebouwd en een gedeelte is nog maar afgesloten. 
Het probleem is dat in een deel waar fiets- en wandelroutes lopen de wegenverkeerswet niet geldt. Je bent er volgens de borden "op eigen risico". 
Gr eggie
zsero (2020-04-07 11:39:07+00:00): I mean ISO code.
kqmaps (2021-09-02 18:40:12+00:00): Hi Niels Elgaard Larsen, thanks for mapping! I noticed that you added a 'fixme=check when done’ tag to Askøgade in København Ø (way 1757741 and other ways in the area). It appears that the road construction is complete, and I updated the area as best as I could with the Mapillary you uploaded last year. As you’ve been to this area since construction was completed I’d appreciate any updates or additional details you might know for this area. Thanks!
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2021-09-03 15:29:41+00:00): Thank you. I did have a look going by on Vognmandsparken  by bicycle recently and it did look finished.
czubi (2020-04-08 21:20:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286803108
ist das wirklich NUR Radweg? Da bin ich immer skeptisch. Dann ist dort zu Fuß gehne verboten!?. Welche Verkehrszeichen stehen dort?
czubi (2020-04-08 21:24:01+00:00): cycleway ist es nur wenn DE:237 dasteht. Und das kann ich mir dort fast nicht vorstellen.
complete_gth (2020-04-09 07:50:27+00:00): Dort gibt es tatsächlich kein Schild, nur die Umlaufsperren am Anfang und Ende des Weges .
czubi (2020-04-09 07:54:56+00:00): dann mach ich path draus
czubi (2020-04-09 07:57:04+00:00): mach bitte die Umlaufsperren noch dran, du weist wo die sind
czubi (2020-04-09 07:58:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dcycle_barrier
PT-53 (2020-04-07 13:52:26+00:00): Hallo wurzelast,
was ist der Grund, daß Du die Angaben zum "Vereinsheim" vom Gebäude auf einen separaten Knoten übertragen hast?
Fragende Grüße
user_2066394 (2020-04-07 14:44:24+00:00): kein besonderer grund, ist persönlicher arbeitsstil. wollte auch noch den SV Baustetten weiter unten anschauen, ggf. macht hier auch club=sport mehr sinn?
PT-53 (2020-04-07 15:06:52+00:00): Persönlicher Arbeitsstil?
Die Eingabe der Daten am Gebäudeumriß war nicht falsch. Du bist auch kein "örtlicher Mapper", so daß "Dein persönlicher Arbeitsstill" hier überhaupt nicht zählt.
Ich erwarte daß Du Deine Änderung wieder zurücknimmst!
Grüße
PT-53 - örtlicher Mapper
user_2066394 (2020-04-07 16:08:29+00:00): wird erledigt :-)
PT-53 (2020-04-07 17:42:10+00:00): Gut daß Du das einsiehst und Deine Änderung zurückgesetzt hast.
Bitte halte Dich aber mit Deinem persönlichen Arbeitstil außerhalb Deiner Region zurück!
Grüße
aachso (2020-04-07 14:53:24+00:00): The edits look fine to me. It would be nice if you'd add a source tag to your changesets (not to the map data itself) though, so others can see where this information is coming from.

For example, source=survey or source=aerial_imagery.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source#Specific_values for more values.

Thanks!
smoFriedman (2020-04-07 12:50:05+00:00): Added buildings and one unmaintained track road. 

Adjusted course of PE-28B trunk road to better fit imagery.
trial (2020-05-21 18:03:36+00:00): Bonjour, Cimetière n'est pas un nom mais une description en français de landuse=cemetery. Merci de ne pas ajouter ce genre de non information.
trial (2020-05-21 18:06:56+00:00): Il existe des outils d'assurance qualité pour éviter ce genre d'erreurs communes, Osmose en est un.
Voici ce qu'il dit sur les objets que vous avez modifié :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/MDJ%20Inguiniel
Ça ne veut pas dire que vous soyez à l'origine de ces erreurs mais vous pouvez profiter pour les corriger.
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 18:30:27+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?  Надеюсь в преть Ваши правки будут менее глобальными. Согласовывайте импорт, перетегирование и удаление тегов с местным сообществом. В противном случае будет откачено
Спасибо за понимание.
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 18:30:04+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?  Надеюсь в преть Ваши правки будут менее глобальными. Согласовывайте импорт, перетегирование и удаление тегов с местным сообществом. В противном случае будет откачено
Спасибо за понимание.
luiswoo (2020-04-07 16:46:17+00:00): Не нужно прибивать к дорога то, что не относиться дороги. Если дороги мешаю, их отображение можно отключить.
luiswoo (2020-04-07 16:46:50+00:00): *что не относиться к дорогам
OlegKukharchik (2020-06-03 11:20:21+00:00): Hi! Why you have changed access on way 303217137 to private? Do you have any additional information about it? Thanks
arkangel69 (2020-06-03 11:52:19+00:00): I have knowledge of the area, the road belongs to a school so is private access only i.e. only if you attend/work at the school.
OlegKukharchik (2020-06-03 11:59:03+00:00): I see, thanks for your answer!
chachafish (2020-04-07 16:32:16+00:00): Hello, is there a reason for changing the network and operator tags for these relations?
Claudius Henrichs (2020-08-22 10:39:02+00:00): Please see my response at https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/82826905
mavl (2020-04-10 03:56:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
К сожалению, вы добавляете в OpenStreetMap несуществующие объекты. Например:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7375562085  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6606962886  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6620994498  
  
Пожалуйста, обратите внимание, когда вы используете редактор карты в программе maps.me, то вы редактируете не свою личную карту, а общую карту, которую видят миллионы людей. Поэтому не используйте карту в качестве своих личных заметок.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
BCNorwich (2020-04-07 16:39:21+00:00): Hi Benarg, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Some landowners will say anything to deter folk from exercising a public right across their private land. Listen to what they say then determine the truth. All land in the UK is private but there are many varied instances where there is public access to private land as a right.
The East/West section was correctly tagged as foot designated, this is a Public Right of Way. I have walked this path. If you must put an access tag here then access=agriculture better describes it as the way serves adjacent land, two houses and farms.
I have reinstated the foot=designated tag and added access=agriculture.
From Chain Bridge to Stoke Road priory chase is a Norfolk County Council Maintained Road. U21327. I have amended the tags on these sections.
The other section NE of Chain bridge, I have walked this in the past with no hindrance but I see there is no recorded public use. Please don't put access=private as this precludes anyone claiming a public access right from the time you declare it private. I have amended the tags on these sections.

Regards Bernard.
Capello13 (2020-04-07 14:35:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ces premières contributions, j'aurai juste une petite remarque :
Vous avez créé un point portant sur le lycée Auguste Renoir, or celui existe déjà sur OpenStreetMap, mais en surfacique : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40822786#map=18/45.82251/1.24216.
Pour moi votre nœud fait doublon et comporte moins d'information, on peut le supprimer.
Je vous laisse corriger et vous souhaite de bons ateliers SNT.
Capello13
Shaun das Schaf (2025-01-04 17:24:01+00:00): Hallo, ist zwar schon lange her, aber weisst du noch ob das hier wirklich ein (mit Zeichen DE:239) ausgeschilderter Fußweg ist oder einfach ein Pfad?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
barfüßiger Algenspäher (2025-02-23 20:30:29+00:00): Hi,
nein, das weiß ich nicht mehr.
Viele Grüße
BCNorwich (2020-04-07 16:43:14+00:00): Hi,
I've amended the tag landuse=farmland to 
place=farm, this is to suit OSM practice.
Regards Bernard.
eggie (2020-04-07 14:15:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Denk er svp aan om commentaar toe te voegen bij je upload zodat andere mappers begrijpen wat je hebt gedaan.
Je hebt een aantal gebouwen verwijderd (gesloopt?)
en de waterway=canal iets gewijzigd, maar dat was misschien per ongeluk?
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2020-04-07 23:21:58+00:00): In de BAG is niets te vinden van een sloopvergunning. Op de meest recente luchtfoto lijken alle gebouwen er nog te staan.
Het lijkt mij gewenst de changeset te reverten.
eggie (2020-04-08 07:08:40+00:00): reverted by changeset #83234797

Dag Remco,
Omdat er verder geen reactie meer is gekomen van jou kant  heb ik deze wijzigingen teruggedraaid.
MVG,
Eggie
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 18:29:47+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?  Надеюсь в преть Ваши правки будут менее глобальными. Согласовывайте импорт, перетегирование и удаление тегов с местным сообществом. В противном случае будет откачено
Спасибо за понимание.
eggie (2020-04-07 14:24:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
CjMalone (2020-06-25 08:15:04+00:00): Are you sure there isn't a post office inside this Costcutter? [pol_branch_list_2020‑02‑20](https://osm.mathmos.net/postoffice/branch/135721) says there is.
Locator (2020-06-29 04:49:36+00:00): Hi, thanks for that. I will amend it soon and take a look (when I can get out there!).
Thanks again and stay safe,

L
phidauex (2020-04-08 03:29:35+00:00): Hi, your recent imports are leaving tons of orphan nodes - are you seeing these and cleaning them up before proceeding?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83202691
rsavoye (2020-04-08 03:31:42+00:00): I'm still working on cleaning up a few things at this exact moment.
phidauex (2020-04-08 03:56:32+00:00): Thanks - I saw a lot of changes coming through and just wanted to make sure you had noticed this issue before you got too deep into it.
rsavoye (2020-04-08 03:58:04+00:00): They should be gone now. I usually do try to filter these out, will try to see where they snuck in. Anyway, there's always a little latency upstream for a larger change, so I'll double check in the morning for this and any other issues from this changeset.
aceman444 (2020-05-30 16:55:38+00:00): Dakujem za diplnenie nazvy farmy, len skoda tych zbytocne poposuvanych budov, ktore boli dobre. Ak nepouzivate snimky zo ZBGIS ani vrstvu budov z katastra (v editore JOSM), skuste neposuvat budovy so source=kapor2 a predpokladajte, ze su dobre. Inak aj na Maxare, ktory uvadzate ako zdroj je vidiet, ze teraz su budovy zle posunute (porovnaje zvysok Vychodnej). Asi ste si nezarovnali dobre letecke snimky (prave podla budov so source=kapor2). Budovy vratim, ale potom je otazka nakolko su spravne umiestnene vsetky ostatne zmeny :(
mapman44 (2020-04-08 05:20:24+00:00): Could you please tell us why you deleted some driveways that appear to be still in use? Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83203103
Jethron (2020-04-08 12:51:43+00:00): Some of them were mislabeled. But more importantly, I did some more reading on the best practices of driveways with OSM and realized I had some misconceptions. I partially undid this edit, adding the driveways again. Thank you for helping me realize I had a misunderstanding.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83203103
mapman44 (2020-04-08 13:19:19+00:00): Thanks for following up on this. Good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83203103
Frans S (2020-04-07 16:53:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please read the instructions of IDeditor how to map waterways.
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/

Best regards
Frans S (2020-04-07 16:55:24+00:00): Hello again. 
Another issue. You mapped this river ( I changed the tag) just to the border of your task. Please extend it over the edge, otherwise other mappers who continue on the next tasks don't see that river or highway
Best regards
Frans S (2020-04-07 17:16:36+00:00): And, (Sorry I did see it just now) Please square all the rectangular buildings you map with the Q key in IDeditor
Thanks
AdVerburg (2020-04-09 06:32:39+00:00): Wat is de reden om een correct getagde site (met railway:preserved) te vervangen door een verouderde tag (railway=preserved)?
En hiermee een waslijst aan foutmeldingen creërend zie: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/?#zoom=13&lat=51.4661&lon=3.989&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
ZldYe (2020-04-09 08:02:00+00:00): Hoi Ad!
Volgens de wiki is railway=preserved nog gewoon een veelgebruikte tag, en wordt die andere alleen door openrailwaymap gebruikt.
Zie ook http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/SBP , wordt voor bijna alle historische railways in nederland gebruikt. 
Groetjes
AdVerburg (2020-04-09 08:13:27+00:00): De vraag was (en is) wat is de reden is om iets wat correct getagd is, te veranderen.
ZldYe (2020-04-10 10:41:09+00:00): Omdat het dan gerenderd wordt net als de andere historische railways in nederland, omdat het dan logischer is dat dit geen main railway is, en omdat dit zorgt voor meer uniformiteit op de nederlands kaart.