piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-01-26 21:29:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
azsr (2018-01-30 21:12:44+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55786877
viloan (2018-01-26 21:31:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BladeTC (2018-09-12 17:42:13+00:00): HellyAg, não copie nomes do Google. A exemplo, esta via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556111599 (Travessa Mario Miranda), o mesmo do Google, se chama Praça Nicolino Rossi, de acordo com IBGE Censo 2010.
O OSM pode ter problemas de Copyright se forem inseridos informações sem permissão de outros mapas, e estes dados podem ser apagados.
DD1GJ (2018-01-27 01:20:10+00:00): Revert 55787022 55786978, Pokémon-Edits

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:00:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:03:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Captain_Spork (2018-01-26 22:52:18+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Captain_Spork (2018-01-26 23:19:12+00:00): Hello Relfeaj,

Not sure if you speak Dutch so I'll continue in English.

You mapped a leisure=garden but I don't really think it is a garden. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=garden

To me it looks more like landuse=village_green. There has been a discussion about it on the Dutch forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56899 

The strict definition of village_green is a distinctive area in a village centre that is usually grass but if you take a look at the tagging controversy at the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green you will see it's used to map all kinds of mixed vegetation (plants, bushes, flowers, small trees, grass). In the Netherlands we use it this way and even in England they seem to use it for all kinds of mixed vegetation.

You say there is a monument in the middle? If it's a statue you could place a node and tag it like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atourism%3Dartwork with an artwork_type=statue or sculpture. If you know who the artist is you could also specify artist_name=

Hopefully this feedback will help you out. Let me know it when you have any questions.

Best regards,
Mark
Relfeaj (2018-01-27 01:24:44+00:00): Hoi Mark,

Ik vind het ook lastig. Het zijn geen bloemen, ook geen gras. Village green is het eigenlijk ook niet zoals in het topic beschreven.

Garden is het wel. Het heeft een decoratieve functie (vooral met monument).

Park is het ook niet want er is niet echt open ruimte.

Ik zal nog proberen te achterhalen welk monument het is.
viloan (2018-01-26 21:49:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-01-27 12:07:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved an address node over 100 meters, but I can't see any building there. Please check also the correct position of the other address nodes. Thanks!
mavl (2018-01-27 15:47:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
ToeBee (2018-02-02 06:46:42+00:00): You seem to have marked a lot of parks as recreation grounds. I do not believe that this is correct usage of the tag. Please read this wiki page about the recreation ground tag:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground  

It is a somewhat disputed tag but if anything, it might be appropriate to apply to specific areas within parks that are intended fro specific recreation activities but certainly not the entire park.
DD1GJ (2018-01-27 01:25:43+00:00): Revert 55787654 55787450, Pokémon-Vandalismis, Wohngebiet "geflutet".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Nakaner-repair (2018-02-11 23:56:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 56277501, 56277015, 56277682, 56275296 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and undiscussed address import/mass modification by user geocodec. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2018-February/009114.html. This also reverts some other bad edits which rely on versions uploaded by this import.
aceman444 (2018-02-05 22:50:15+00:00): Zdravim, tie vetvy na krizovatke ako way 556118380 sa mi zase javia ako zbytocne detaily, potom Vam tam vznikaju trojite priechody pre chodcov, chybaju Vam zakazy otocenia naspat (napr. z way 556118384 na way 556118381).
aceman444 (2018-02-05 23:06:13+00:00): A ta krizovatka Bosakova/Jantarova cesta to je aky experiment? Ta bola prekomplikovana uz pred tym, ale aspon to bolo technicky spravne. Ale tieto nove sikme vetvy co ste tam vymysleli a nekrizuju sa spolocnym bodom s ostatnymi cestami, to je uplne zle. A preco ste vymazali way 499980891 ?
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
aceman444 (2026-01-08 09:19:29+00:00): Zdravim, toto budu zrejme nejake neoficialne "adresy", kedze cela budova ma podla registra adries adresu Kosicka 17180/49. Ak ide len o cisla vchodov C1-D2, tak to sa da zapisat ako name, ci ref, nie vo forme adresy, ktora je uplne neplatna (49 nie je supisnym cislom, hoci ste ho dali pred lomitkom).
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
andergrin (2018-01-27 01:08:47+00:00): Добрий день. Ви використовуєте застарілу карту maps.me, і наносите точки, які вже є на карті. Також назви вулиць треба вказувати українською мовою.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:58:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-28 07:54:08+00:00): Hi Eljusticiero, welcome to OSM.

Please map only what's on the ground. Don't map fictive data! #Vandalism

This changeset is reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55817472

Original content: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55787899
freebeer (2018-01-27 10:34:18+00:00): Hi,
I saw that your updates to sidewalks included shifting the position of several in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55787946 .
That is often the case of poorly-aligned background imagery.  So I thought I would take a look, as I know the available aerial imageries in the US have gotten much worse.
This is what I saw, as you used the newer poorer Bing imagery to shift, most strikingly, the small circular path west of Crowley Parkway, but not the wavy path directly east of same, which should align to older aerial imagery.
This is in fact what I see; Bing and other imagery providers match well your changes, but not the original data.
This imagery is known to be often poorly adjusted with perhaps several metres offset.
For aligning things, if a sharper imagery is not available, I like to use the USGS Large Scale imagery, and indeed, here it matches well with the wavy line, but north of where you shifted part of it, and probably those ways you have not shifted.
It is a pity there is not better imagery in your area, and that you spent your time moving things from a more correct position to one that is less accurate, rather than repositioning the background instead.
If you align the imagery to the original wavy path, you will then see that the roads line up much better.
I hope you understand what I am trying to say.
Unfortunately I cannot tell you exactly how to compare and shift the background imageries in your particular editor, but maybe someone else can be a better help with this.
Sorry for all your extra work!
FightinGobbler (2018-01-27 12:16:45+00:00): Thanks for that detailed response. I totally get what you’re saying. Is there a way to just throw out all the sidewalk edits? 

My original intent was to simply complete the neighborhood by extending all the sidewalks to connect with each other, and I got sidetracked updating all of the alignment to the background picture. 

Again, thanks so much for your detailed response. It will really help me moving forward.
freebeer (2018-01-27 15:27:52+00:00): Howdy, PugnaciousPoultry...
I have again taken a much closer look at the achavi URL, and I *believe* this particular changeset is almost nothing more than shifting the geometry.
That is, my cast-off LED flatscreen doesn't clearly distinguish green from yellow, but I don't think I see any newly-added sidewalks.
The red->green is where you moved things; a green-only without your name on the data seems to mean it was connected to something you changed, but is not new.
.
That is, I believe it is easiest to revert every change made in this changeset to restore how things used to be, and start anew.
(There are probably sidewalk-mapping tips you should be getting as well, but I'm not looking closely at that yet.)
Then you can spend some time to familiarise yourself with the different (lousy) aerial imageries available in your area.  And if you want to get really depressed, visit other areas with sharp and detailed ESRI Community World Imagery, such as the entire state of Connecticut, select parts of California, Florida, Basel (Switzerland), and the zoomlevel 20 Bing imagery showing its age around major USian metro regions.
If I do see anything go missing completely from a revert, I might be able to restore it.  But if you've added buildings, they were not done here and will not be touched.
I think that would be easier than moving things back (assuming you agree about the positioning) with as much work you put into being sidetracked earlier.
.
That is, I think this is good news.  The Bad News is that like you, I'm still a beginner and have not carried out a full changeset revert, preferring to keep my hands clean, so someone will have to volunteer to help you with that.
I'm glad my first reply did not quite trigger a tl;dr reaction, but I'm sure everything I write can be given that treatment by someone better skilled with fewer words.
FightinGobbler (2018-01-27 17:41:35+00:00): I’m totally fine with a full revert of this changeset . It was only around 30-45 minutes and not a big deal at all if something else gets removed. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to initiate that. I’ll check out the help forums and see what I can find.
Thanks again!
freebeer (2018-01-27 22:58:21+00:00): Hi, sorry for not replying sooner...
The easiest way to have a revert happen will probably be if someone takes pity and offers to do it Just This Once...
.
Before you do any more mapping, and while awaiting a revert, can I ask you to become familiar with the different background imagery -- including that which was used for the original tracing?
If I understand, there should be either the command `b' in editor iD or an icon like layered papers referring to Background imagery layers.
The default is Bing; others to note are ESRI, two DigitalGlobe offerings, Mapbox, and USGS Large Scale imagery to cover the US.
Don't actually move any sidewalks as that could make a revert difficult -- look, don't touch; play, don't save.
.
But, I'll point you to this forum discussion:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60988
In it is a URL that you can use as a learning tool, which gives you access to the old imagery (ESRI Clarity) that is clearer, even if well older, than anything for your area.
I've added it to my Potlatch editor to verify it brings up what I expect.
And it does!  Yay!

Don't use it for tracing until the legal permission is clarified; but then, almost everything near you was already traced from it.
Note how it perfectly matches those sidewalks you have not yet moved.  I think I measured over 3 metres offset between this and the default imagery.
Also, get a feel for how bad each of the other imageries are compared to this, even if they are newer.
.
And if you can discover how you can adjust the background images in your editor to line up, such as on the dual-Y diamond shape on the wavy walk, that would be great -- for me with Potlatch, it is holding down the Space bar and clicking and dragging the background in the editor, but I'm sure it's not that for anything else.
Notice how perfectly the waterbody outlines match this background too.
I'll try to explain details about each imagery and zoomlevel for your area, if it's not too much writing and you want to learn ;-)
However, I think now lack of sleep is taking its toll, as I was unable to carry out a conversation a short while ago, despite thinking I was awake, so I'll try to use this kezboard as a pillow for some time.
More later... (words of impending DOOM)
freebeer (2018-01-28 04:22:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55820191 where the changeset comment is: user requested revert of aligning ways to poor Bing aerials, rather than aligning background image to ways
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-29 11:04:13+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM! You asked for a review of this change.

You marked this as "natural=grassland", but that's more for savannah in Africa or something, not a patch of grass in a housing estate! 🙂 I've changed it to landuse=grass which is correct for this.
geoaria (2018-01-31 19:15:02+00:00): دوست عزیز 
لطفا قبل از ویرایش نقشه قوانین آن را مطالعه کنید و درست ویرایش کنید ، متاسفانه مسیر های ترسیم شده توسط شما دارای اشکالات متعدد است. اینگونه ترسیم نه تنها کمکی به نقشه نمی کند که مشکلات عدیده مسیریابی را ایجاد خواهدکرد
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:55:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-27 07:16:25+00:00): philipemaster, thank you very much for the revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54678613
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:00:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
viloan (2018-01-26 22:28:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-01-27 15:46:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
lakedistrict (2018-01-27 13:31:09+00:00): Are you tweaking the names based on the FHRS records? "Hare & Hounds" was the name on the pub when I mapped it, and I copied "CofE" on the schools from the Edubase comparison tool (http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/progress/LA/), although what you've changed them to have the same meaning. :)
gurglypipe (2018-01-27 13:33:29+00:00): Not entirely. I’m tweaking them based on what seems right, since ‘&’ is normally a stylistic contraction of ‘and’, and ‘CofE’ just doesn’t make sense. I’m open to being persuaded this is not a good idea.
lakedistrict (2018-01-27 13:50:17+00:00): I tend to map names as they're styled on a sign or on a website. 'CofE' was what my old school used and what Edubase tends to use but after checking a few school websites there's no uniform styling with 'CE', 'C of E', 'C.E.' and 'CofE' all being used. I guess C of E is easier to read and would be better for text-to-speak software too.
gurglypipe (2018-01-27 19:55:34+00:00): Yeah, I was aware there’s no consistent uniform styling. Although I vaguely remembered that in my home town, everything was styled as ‘C of E’ on the signs. You make a good point about text to speech software. I’ll continue changing schools to ‘C of E’ as I come across them, and make decisions about other things on a case by case basis.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:56:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].