piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zorglubu (2021-10-06 08:39:47+00:00): Bonjour, et bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite, pour les vues du ciel, à choisir l'imagerie OrthoHR qui est en de nombreux endroits, en France, bien meilleure que Bing.

Mais vos contributions sont parfaites :-)
Bonne continuation !
mueschel (2021-10-06 08:22:07+00:00): Hi,
please check these edits. All the nodes contain many tags that shouldn't appear in OSM, e.g.
Doctors=1
Inpatients=1
Nurses=2
Outpatients=3
Settlement=Kawempe_II
Village=Kawempe ku tanu
X=32.556701
Y=0.3811645

Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
gscholz (2021-10-15 04:47:52+00:00): Hi laflovver,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Região Geográfica Imediata de Campina Grande", "Região Geográfica Imediata de Sumé", "Livramento" and "Taperoá". I just fixed this for you. If you don't know how to handle relations, please do not touch them. Anyway please read this:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary

Guido
laflovver (2021-10-15 07:09:26+00:00): Hello Gscholz,
I apologize for my omission and thank you for correcting me. I will try to be more attentive with Relation:boundary.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-10-07 02:05:57+00:00): Hi, these are looking really good!
You shouldn't have `name=unnamed`, you can do `noname=yes` instead.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname=yes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ivanbranco (2021-12-19 19:26:33+00:00): Hi SekeRob,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13292620/history

I noticed this parking because of the street_side typo, but don't you think a parking=surface would fit better? 
A street_side "can be reached directly from the roadway without having to use an access way", here instead there's even a parking aisle. What you think about it?
SekeRob (2021-12-19 22:12:13+00:00): You'll find quite a few of these 'w' and 'ù' suffixed fat finger typos of mine courtesy of my old keyboard. Not sure why I did not change it to parking=surface since I mapped both, the aisles added after inserting the hedges which made it no longer street_side. I'll make the correction.

Thanks for alerting.

ciao
HansWesterback (2021-10-09 13:57:18+00:00): Vad menas med detta? Är det nån sorts prank? I så fall återställ snarast till dom rätta namnen, och ta bort "Danteanslutningen"
Grillo (2021-10-09 15:14:04+00:00): Har återställt detta changeset
ivanbranco (2021-10-05 14:24:37+00:00): Ciao Alessandro, benvenuto su OSM!

Hai inserito una pista ciclabile, non è però una semplice strada agricola?
Vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Grillo (2021-10-09 15:13:24+00:00): Detta verkar vara ren vandalisering. Har återställt changesetet
SafetyIng (2021-10-15 08:23:49+00:00): Hey, cool dass du/ihr eure Daten hier mit hinzufügt. 
Ich würde auf ein paar kleine Sachen hinweisen, die leider doof gelaufen sind. Der Key "name" ist nur für reale und keine Beschreibenden Namen. Somit ist Wohnhaus eher falsch. Bei den Ferienhäusern kann man noch streiten, die würde ich nicht so schlimm betiteln, da gehört es aber auch eher in den KEy "description"...
Grüße
Robin
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
vvoovv (2021-10-05 14:09:46+00:00): Please don't make tests in the live database. I deleted your edit.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-10-06 09:04:40+00:00): Ciao. Anche questa strada non è classificata correttamente. Per essere una cycleway ci deve essere l'apposito cartello: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway Inoltre la strada non è collegata a sud con il resto della rete viaria ma è attaccata ad un confine amministrativo (in genere si preferisce non attaccare nulla ai confini). Ciao, Andrea
Frans S (2021-10-05 10:20:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
Blue rectangular traces are mostly buildings. (Clear Blue corrugated metal roof)
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112114515
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Tilia_J (2021-10-05 13:22:23+00:00): Die verwijderde wegen: Heeft dat er niet mee te maken dat tijdens jouw bezoek (nog) niet alles gemaaid was? Op obliquefoto's (schuine luchtfoto's) van april '21 is er óf gemaaid óf duidelijke betreding te zien op de door jou verwijderde tracks.
MStorm (2021-10-06 05:44:15+00:00): Er wordt hier niet meer gemaaid met machines. Er loopt nu een kudde schapen.
Het pad bovenop de belt is met struiken overgroeid en hier kun je echt niet meer door.
Het verwijderde pad aan de zuid-oost was helemaal dichtgegroeid met brandnetels en ik verwacht niet dat de schapen dat snel weggevreten of platgetrapt hebben. Ik kom regelmatig hier en zal in de gaten houden of dat verandert.
Van de korte paadjes aan de noord-oostkant die ik verwijderd heb, was ook niets meer te zien.
Константин Гам (2021-11-24 16:22:20+00:00): Убедительная просьба, не ставить bicycle=yes без обнаружения на местности соотв. дорожных знаков
mueschel (2021-10-09 14:23:30+00:00): Hi,
what does 'oneway:conditional:hd' mean? The subkey 'hd' is not used in other places.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SekeRob (2021-10-06 12:08:08+00:00): Truly weird.... the history only shows the landuse value as farmland, yet latest keys lists the case as famrland. One of the many riddles in OSM, noting that I found histories being lost if areas/lines are split or merged. Here over the cause of days I've added members, so who knows what happened, typo made in one session, caught in next session, but why then retroactive?

have a good day.
mueschel (2021-10-06 12:33:16+00:00): The "landuse = farmland" was right from the beginning. It's the "farmland = field" that had the typo.
SekeRob (2021-10-06 12:39:32+00:00): Lol, confidence restored. Did not make it into is Osmose or neis type flag listing. At least one who keeps me straight. 

Ciao
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-10-05 12:26:50+00:00): Dag Alexander.

Je vraagt feedback..
Lijkt me oke zo. Wel nog toevoegen aan amenity=parking de regel parking=street_side.
Het zijn eigenlijk geen parkeerterreinen. De P's worden dan wat kleiner weergegeven.
BING ligt verschoven als achterhrond. Beter alleen PDOK gebruiken.
Mapse,
eggie
Alexand3r (2021-10-05 15:13:16+00:00): Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-05 17:37:13+00:00): come mai hai tolto stop? Ho visto anche io che un tag corrispondente al capolinea non esiste ma a me ed alle persone nel progetto stop andava bene
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112115638
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-05 17:39:18+00:00): come messi d'accordo utilizza → al posto di >, grazie comunque per il contributo apprezzato!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112115638
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-05 17:36:46+00:00): come mai hai tolto stop? Ho visto anche io che un tag corrispondente al capolinea non esiste ma a me ed alle persone nel progetto stop andava bene
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-05 17:39:21+00:00): come messi d'accordo utilizza → al posto di >, grazie comunque per il contributo apprezzato!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112115686
kartonage (2021-10-08 14:05:31+00:00): Hej,

magst du bitte eine Quelle für die Gebäude hier angeben?
Auf keinen der typischen Luftbildern sind diese zu sehen. Selbst auf relativ aktuellen Bildern von Sentinel (26.09.) tue ich mich schwer die Gebäude dieser Art zu sehen.

Beste Grüße
jmsbert (2024-02-09 23:32:54+00:00): Hallo Jever61,
leider bis heute keine Angabe, welche Quelle tatsächlich verwendet wurde. 
Auch in 2024 ist nur ein Bruchteil der Gebäude auf Satellitenbildern sichtbar (Bing). Vor allem aber passen die Positionen der Straßen und Gebäude (waren nicht rechtwinklig gezeichnet) nicht, was deutlich wird, wenn man die Strava Heatmap als Hintergrund lädt. Bing und Esri haben zur Heatmap wiederum kaum einen Offset - und belegen damit umso mehr, dass hier sehr wenig passt...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112115716
woodpeck (2024-02-18 22:48:15+00:00): Ich habe diese Gebäude jetzt wieder gelöscht, da die Quelle fragwürdig ist und der Benutzer sich durch Accountlöschung weiterer Kommunikation entzogen hat. (DWG Ticket#2024021810000168)
jmsbert (2024-02-18 23:07:50+00:00): Vielen Dank für die umgehende Rückmeldung. Ich habe nun die letzten verbliebenen Wegabschnitte entfernt. Werde nun anhand Luftbild von Neuem beginnen. Straßennamen + Hausnummern müssen dann vor Ort in Erfahrung gebracht werden.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-05 17:33:41+00:00): confermo: le fermate che ho aggiunte alla relazione sono corrette. Ci sono tabelle nella quale vengono inserite le linee che passano per la fermata e ce sia la 2 (tram) che la 2/ (bus sostitutivo)
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-05 17:39:29+00:00): come messi d'accordo utilizza → al posto di >, grazie comunque per il contributo apprezzato!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112116266
gigi2037 (2021-10-06 22:39:30+00:00): Ciao non lo metto in dubbio ma come in via nazzionale la fermata del tram non puo essere anche quella del bus sono due relazioni diverse almeno credo
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-07 04:52:35+00:00): Se guardi https://goo.gl/maps/S9mAj8ASiGsEjg9v8 ce la tabella con il 2 sostituito dal 2/, la 4 e la 64. Al massimo aggiungere bus yes tra i tag.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-07 05:01:16+00:00): Ho chiesto come mapparla sul gruppo telegram. attendo risposta.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
eggie (2021-10-06 08:14:12+00:00): Beste Tvdb

Svp niet de routering proberen te beïnvloeden door verboden toe te voegen die er niet zijn.

Waar staat hier ergens een bord met Alleen Toegang Bewoners? Het is een regulier woonerf.
Graag reactie.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-06 08:22:49+00:00): Je zou de breedte van de wegdelen kunnen toevoegen en/of de draagkracht van die bruggetjes. 
Dan kan de app routingapp daar wellicht rekening mee houden.
Ik heb het inrijverbod verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-06 08:48:55+00:00): 

Wellicht is deze tag bruikbaar

hgv=discouraged

Het is een officiële OSM tag. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hgv%3Ddiscouraged
jeslop (2021-10-05 14:52:54+00:00): Hola Fernando. No has contestado a la nota en tu anterior conjunto de cambios y has vuelto a borrar piscinas sin dar ninguna explicación.

OSM es un proyecto colaborativo, no se puede actuar de este modo.
Responde a las cuestiones de la comunidad.
Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Facundo Belascoain (2021-10-05 15:13:00+00:00): Hola Jesús, sí te contesté anteriormente y di una explicación, por este mismo espacio para comentarios.
jeslop (2021-10-05 15:55:01+00:00): Disculpa Facundo, pero en el conjunto anterior no veo ningún comentario tuyo (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111817805#map=18/-31.53591/-68.49726). ¿Te importaría pegarlo aquí a ver si así puedo verlo?

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Facundo Belascoain (2021-10-05 16:01:54+00:00): Recuerdo haber redactado la respuesta. Qué extraño!
Lo que decía, es que yo estoy de a poco mapeando edificaciones cerca de mi zona. Y luego de pensarlo, me pareció que la información sobre piletas privadas no era relevante para el interés de la comunidad.
Pienso mapear y colaborar con piscinas de acceso público, con fines de dispersión en verano, deportes, o similar.
Disculpa, pero no encuentro mi anterior respuesta, tal vez no se publicó.
jeslop (2021-10-05 16:11:28+00:00): Gracias por la pronta respuesta. Como te decía en el cambio anterior, la etiqueta está normalizada y es perfectamente correcta. OSM es una comunidad muy amplia y lo que para algunos puede no resultar interesante para otros sí puede serlo.

Si tu interés son las piletas públicas, adelante, pero por favor no borres el trabajo que ha realizado otro usuario.

Un saludo y gracias por tu trabajo.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-05 19:01:39+00:00): Tiesiog gatvės šone esantis dviračių ar pėsčiųjų takas yra neesminis, todėl NEŽYMIMAS atskiru vektoriumi. Tik prie kelio pridedam žymą, kad šita gatvė turi šaligatvį ar dvirtakį. Daugiau info čia: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
surveyor54 (2022-03-03 11:46:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6480702045

Frage, warum wurde die Ladestation gelöscht. Sie wurde wahrscheinlich im Winter wegen Witterungseinflüssen ins Trockene gestellt. 
Habe dort schon mein bike aufgeladen, es ist eine portable Ladestation.
surveyor54 (2022-03-03 11:52:34+00:00): Link zum Bild:
https://ibb.co/3d2nGhz
N969 (2022-03-03 17:21:33+00:00): Das war vor Ort jetzt nicht ersichtlich. Ich kann das gerne wieder rückgängig machen. Eventuell gibts die Möglichkeit das auch so einzutragen, dass es die Lademöglichkeit nur saisonal gibt. Ist der Betreiber die Main-Kinzig-Werke oder der Betreiber des Cafés?
surveyor54 (2022-03-04 21:40:06+00:00): Saisonal wäre eine gute Lösung. Ich habe bei dieser Art von Ladestationen schon öfters erlebt, dass sie in Winter eingemottet wurden.
Die Kreiswerke Main-Kinzig GmbH  sind der Betreiber. 

https://www.kreiswerke-main-kinzig.de/privatkunden/erneuerbare-energien/e-mobilitaet

Ich werde es wieder rückgängig machen.

Viele Grüße
N969 (2022-03-04 23:17:20+00:00): Ok. Sorry für die Umstände. Da muss ich das nächste mal genauer hinschauen.
eggie (2021-10-05 12:30:18+00:00): Tip.. Probeer zoveel mogelijk bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Dus niet nogmaals een adres aanmaken.
Ik heb de info samengevoegd.

MVG
eggie
Alexand3r (2021-10-05 15:09:19+00:00): Hoi Eggie, ik zag dubbele adresnodes en dacht dat er een verschil was tussen 'pand' en 'bestemming van het pand'.

Maar inderdaad veel logischer om het samen te voegen. Dank!
eggie (2021-10-05 15:14:48+00:00): Klopt... Met adresnode-import zijn we pas later begonnen.. vandaar dat je daar soms nog het effect van ziet.
Gr eggie
Hans Thompson (2021-10-05 16:51:11+00:00): thx.
Frans S (2021-10-05 14:48:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped.
In a number of mappings you include the shade of the building in your mapping. That is not a part of the building
 Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112119479
hsc666 (2021-10-05 13:13:36+00:00): Hi 1Olivia1 and welcome to OSM!

Please note that OSM is not a toy and people rely on the accuracy of the data. I have therefore reverted your change. 

BR
hsc666
aTarom (2022-05-01 07:27:54+00:00): Bon dia i gràcies per actualitzar OSM, sembla que hi ha algun error amb algunes de les adreces, per exemple aquesta:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4855559885
Sembla que vau canviar el nom del carrer però es van quedar portals per actualitzar?

Podeu revisar més possibles errors d'aquest tipus aquí:
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/Ajuntament%20de%20Girona%20UMAT?level=2

De nou gràcies per participar.
Lee Carré (2021-10-05 18:33:53+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Lyon-St-Clair (2021-10-05 20:11:22+00:00): I correct some railway line tags by the way, but forgot to detail it in the changelog
Frans S (2021-10-05 14:28:08+00:00): Hello, See my previous comments on your mappings. Please take the time to map accurate.
you also draw the yard in your building in a number of cases
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112120320
Frans S (2021-11-30 15:02:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not  in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Y've seen these issues on all your recent changesets.
Please improve your mapping skills.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112120627
rogerpueyo (2021-10-07 11:13:15+00:00): From the PNOA satellite view, it looks like a highway=track rather than highway=path. You may want to double-check it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112120630
Frans S (2021-10-05 14:25:02+00:00): Hello. See my comments on another review.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112120788
Frans S (2021-10-05 14:23:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Your mappings are in general far oversized. Please map more accurate by following the rooflines and square each building. You mapped 1 tras as a round building. In fact it is rectangular. There are hardly round buildings in this area

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112121032
eggie (2021-10-06 08:05:19+00:00): Dag Tvdb

Het zal wellicht een steeg zijn, maar dan zal het gewoon routeren voor autoverkeer.
Welk bord staat er dan vooraan?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-06 08:09:45+00:00): Ik heb paaltjes geplaatst. Nu zal het alleen routeren vanuit het middengedeelte.
mvg
eggie
zorglubu (2021-10-06 07:43:04+00:00): Bonjour, et bienvenue sur Openstreetmap.
Je me suis permis de corriger ces maisons afin de ne garder qu'un seul numéro d'adresse.
La technique dans le cas où cette adresse correspondrait à plusieurs bâtiments consiste à mettre ce numéro sur un nœud placé par exemple au niveau du portail.

Notez également que le code postal et le nom de ville sont à éviter en France, même s'ils sont suggérés. En effet, ils sont difficiles à maintenir sur les maisons en cas de changement, et peuvent être trouvés par les logiciels avec l'objet englobant.

Merci encore.
Bonne continuation sur OSM !
PT-53 (2021-10-05 16:03:22+00:00): Hallo Nordpfeil,
wie kommst Du darauf, daß dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9144645301/history
ein Kindergarten sein soll?
Hast Du Dir schon meinen CS-Kommentar angeschaut:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112083274#map=19/48.10418/9.79333

Fragende Grüße
eggie (2021-10-05 13:41:07+00:00): Dag Jordt.. Jevraagt feedback

Ziet er netjes uit.
parking=street_side zou je kunnen toevoegen, want het zijn eigenlijk geen parkeerterreinen. De P wordt dan minder prominet gerenderd.
Je hebt Wilgenlaan	8 verwijderd.
Bestaat dat adres niet meer? 

Ik zie ook Wikgenlaan 25 ergens rondzwerven.
Meestal krijg je dit soort verplaatingen als je met de kaart gaat schuiven in edit modus.



Je edits: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112121872

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-05 13:48:46+00:00): Er zwerven meer adresnodes rond zonder woning langs de Wilgenlaan.