piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Harvesterify (2021-11-28 18:06:01+00:00): Désolé si le ton u précédent message peut paraître sec, j'étais sur téléphone. Je vais essayer de préciser un peu ma pensée :

Je suis tout à fait d'accord qu'il n'y a pas d'interdiction explicite pour les pétons à cet endroit. Cependant, l'argument du routage me dérange un peu (étant donné que j'ai répondu à cette quête précisément sur cette portion pour cette raison), puisque, pour bien connaitre cette voie (je l'emprunte régulièrement), en tant que piéton, je considérerai comme un bug si le routage me faisait passer par ici à pied.

N'étant pas cartographié sur Mapillary, vous pouvez avoir un aperçu visuel de la voie en question sur Maps : https://www.google.fr/maps/@48.6768973,2.1759892,3a,75y,274.36h,80.08t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sw75OwJzaR5T4AY3Jupp92g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3Dw75OwJzaR5T4AY3Jupp92g%26cb_client%3Dsearch.revgeo_and_fetch.gps%26w%3D96%26h%3D64%26yaw%3D76.82397%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192

Maintenant, je conçois tout à fait que sémantiquement, l'interdiction ici n'est pas correcte. Cependant, je ne connais à priori pas de tag qui permette de convoyer la notion qu'il ne devrait y avoir personne sur cette route (d'autant qu'un chemin piéton fort bien balisé se trouve juste quelques mètres à l'est, avec un passage piéton marqué). Si vous en connaissez (ou une combinaison de tags arrivant au même résultat fonctionnel), je suis tout à fait disposé à revoir ces modifications :)

En vous souhaitant une bonne fin de weekend !
Frans S (2021-11-26 13:02:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key , Map more accurate (oversized buildings)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114233922
Frans S (2021-11-26 13:01:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark. Please don't waste time to map tracks leading into the countryside without hamlets, villages etc.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114234003
user_2066394 (2021-11-25 20:54:34+00:00): Was hatte es mit der 15b auf sich? Gab's die nie?
SekeRob (2021-11-26 09:16:34+00:00): Hi,

If you change the route master ref, then the route ref needs to be updated too, so says Osmose.  Je pense donc je suis" ;?
Anyway, colour/operator/ref now match on both parts.

Cheers

PS It was no typo, it was by an example, but it did look odd at the time, Whilst the army of 'latest new keys' fixers never stepped in.
JesseFTW (2021-11-26 14:37:36+00:00): Ah, I wasn't sure where the associated route relation was -- appreciate you fixing that! I'm sorry I didn't realize it was intended as an example -- could you say more about how the example was intended to work? It looks like "12" is the route number, while "La Cavallerizza" is the route name?
SekeRob (2021-11-26 15:01:18+00:00): No, it was a format i picked up from elsewhere, could have been a wiki. Detail i dont remember, only used few times. 

There are many routes that have a / as suffix. 4/ and 4 both pass the nearest crossing to me. They do run not exactly same routes. Public transport users will know when to lift the hand as most stops here are hail and ride. 

Routes by default must refer to route master. The route master lists the routes its master off. 😁

To me there's lots of duplication in the system. Those Must matching tags in both relations e.g. If in route master why repeat on the route too🤫

Thanks for your reply.
JesseFTW (2021-11-26 16:06:38+00:00): Heh, makes sense. I think the duplication between route and route_master is to link the two together -- but I'm not sure I understand that schema, either. I don't see any other uses of a key that starts with "ref:" and ends with a slash. If you come across any other examples, let me know!
Warin61 (2021-11-28 06:38:27+00:00): Relation 13485464 wetland is in error. 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=129.50471&lat=-14.18659&zoom=17

I expect you would be able to fix this?
Warin61 (2021-11-30 05:04:59+00:00): No communication... no attempt to fix...
ChonkerStonker (2021-11-30 17:25:18+00:00): Apologies. I'll get right on it.
kevinchen1 (2021-11-26 05:11:29+00:00): Hi Gabriel,

welcome to OSM and thank you for drawing missing buildings. I saw that you changed this to landuse=residential instead of building=house. landuse=residential indicates an area that is a neighborhood. I have changed it back to building=house. please see this page for more info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential?uselang=en

Thanks
Kevin
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114234962
Frans S (2021-11-26 12:56:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114235183
kapazao (2022-12-02 17:25:56+00:00): Hola, por favor antes de cambiar la clasificación de las vías deberías saber que esto se hace para dar prioridad de circulación a estas. Cambiaste numerosas vías en Sanlúcar y se perdió la continuidad de la navegación.
Tenlo en cuenta para otra vez y trata de no cambiar cosas con desconocimiento. Puedes revisarlo en la wiki de OpenStreetMap.
Un saludo
eggie (2021-11-25 19:33:55+00:00): Top!
puma515 (2021-11-25 21:32:11+00:00): Moin sundew, 
Das war mein fehler unbewustt.
Der Fehler entsteht leider beim Fehlerbeheben. Das es mit  bus=yes falsch ist weiß ich auch erst seit 2 Wochen. 
ID gibt beim bearbeiten die Warnung: Bushaltestellen (Wartebereich) hat unvollständige Eigenschaften raus und
dazu gibt es dann noch den behebungsvorschlag das mit  bus=yes auszustatten.
Mach ich zukünftig auch nicht mehr.
schön gruß 
puma515
sundew (2021-11-26 19:57:30+00:00): Hallo Puma,
danke, dass du dich zurückgemeldet hast. Genauer gesagt gehört ID an den Pranger. Die waren von Anfang an beratungsresistent und halten sich nicht vollständig an die geltenden Mappingregeln - es gibt viele andere Beispiele. Noch schlimmer: sie nutzen ihre Verbreitung aus, um die Nutzer mittels irgendwelcher "Überprüfungen" zu halbautomatischen falschen Änderungen zu verleiten. Und wenn am Ende ein Großteil im ID-Stil gemappt ist, können sie einfach das Wiki anpassen.
Das perfide ist, dass die Programmentwicklung und Wartung auch noch aus irgendeinem Topf bei OSM bezahlt wird, weil man ja einen schicken Klicki-bunti-Editor haben wollte, egal was damit kaputt gemacht wird ...
Weiterhin ein frohes Mappen,
LG sundew
geozeisig (2021-11-28 14:54:34+00:00): Hallo,
du hast Elemente das Golfplatzes aktualisiert. golf=green erhält aber nicht zusätzlich noch landuse=grass ! das wäre tagging für den Renderer und auch Carto kommt inzwischen damit klar. Genauso golf=bunker ohne natural=sand!
Gruß Geozeisig
DeFra85 (2021-11-28 15:48:49+00:00): Hey, diese Aktualisierung hat mir ID automatisch vorgeschlagen ("Veraltete Eigenschaften"), als ich Loch 4/13 nachgetragen habe. Die Felder wurden auch nicht mehr in der entsprechenden Farbgebung angezeigt wie vor zwei Wochen, als ich sie hinzugefügt habe, sondern jetzt nur noch in grau.
Da muss es wohl eine Neuerung gegeben haben, ansonsten hätte ich daran auch nix geändert.
geozeisig (2021-11-29 06:41:02+00:00): Hallo,
der ID scheint da nicht ganz aktuell zu ein. Bei JOSM sieht es besser aus. Vielleicht wird das beim ID auch noch angepasst.
Darf ich deinen Golfplatz noch mal anpassen oder machst du es selber?
Gruß Geozeisig
DeFra85 (2021-11-29 09:01:17+00:00): Wie gesagt, die Objekte an sich habe ich ja erst vor zwei Wochen hinzugefügt als NUR =tee, =bunker oder =putting_green. Als ich dann vor ein paar Tagen dann den fehlenden Schlagweg hinzugefügt habe, hat er mir erst die Verbesserung für die Objekte vorgeschlagen.

Aber du kannst es gerne korrigieren!
geozeisig (2021-11-30 06:54:32+00:00): Ich habe das noch mal korrigiert (wie auch schon bei (fast) allen anderen Golfplätzen). Fehlen nur noch ein paar Flächen mit golf=fairway.
Gruß Geozeisig
geopackix (2021-11-26 11:38:21+00:00): Hello Wizly,
Why did you delete previous objects (created in changeset: 114205251) instead of chnaging the geometry to prevent history from going lost?

By deleting the object history is lost, and with it the reference that I have already made a change to the object before you.

In my opinion, existing objects should be changed to preserve the history.

Best regards,
geopackix
AgusQui (2021-11-25 22:56:58+00:00): Jaja, el lugar se llamaba Promo Fiesta, se ve que le pifié al tipear. Gracias por tu colaboración.
Dani Suarez (2021-12-15 21:37:48+00:00): Ahhhh tenés razón jajaja. Genial ahora tiene sentido.
Pseudoplatanus (2023-05-09 16:23:26+00:00): Ви проходили ділянку хребтом Великий Рожданів останнім часом? Вона прохідна? В крайній раз я був там 2018 і стежки не було. Ділянка взагалі важкопрохідна по хребту від Лисого Погара до будиночка під Сокольцем.
kagebar (2023-05-09 17:13:16+00:00): ні не був. ту стежку не я позначав, наскільки памятаю я лише підправив її по відкритих gps треках.
mueschel (2021-11-26 11:30:47+00:00): Hi,
there are several areas without any valid tag, like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006250770

Btw, what is the source of all this data? Is the license of the data source comaptible with OSM? Did you follow the Import Guidelines?
plamen (2021-11-26 14:43:01+00:00): Source: http://eea.government.bg/en
License is free, compatible with Open Database License (ODbL) 1.0
It is not mass import, since many areas are in OSM already.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Mashin (2021-11-26 18:46:35+00:00): Hi there is an ongoing road reclassification in CT. Before you do any more edits please contact jnighan (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jnighan).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Jnighan/Connecticut_Highway_Classification_Proposal
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
carfog81 (2021-11-26 15:26:11+00:00): Por favor, no dañen las relaciones multipolígono. Este es un daño muy frecuente del equipo de Kaart.
JAAS (2021-11-26 17:39:57+00:00): Gracias por hacérmelo ver carfog81. 

Admito el error. No me percaté del multipolígono en su momento, al dividir esta vía, que en realidad se encuentra dividida. 

Pasaré el dato al resto del equipo.

Esperamos no causar más este tipo de inconvenientes, sino muy por el contrario - mejorar datos en general.

Ya que tengo tu atención, y aparentemente conoces bien el área, aprovecho a preguntar acerca de la `Carrera 100` - (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297310318/history) - continuando desde la siguiente intersección (con Calle 13) a unos 100 metros al oriente de este punto de referencia - existe o no ese tramo paralelo a la vía del MIA (y al mismo tramo obviamente habilitado para el tránsito regular), o es parte de esta misma (para autobuses). Las imágenes no permiten ver ese detalle y está algo confuso a ambos extremos de la misma... De ser posible, le agradecería su apreciación al respecto. Nuevamente, gracias!
carfog81 (2021-11-30 23:31:02+00:00): Hola. Si existe esa vía, es de 1 carril (lane=1) es paralela a la vía del MIO (Masivo Integrado de Occidente) y a la vía Primaria "Carrera 100". Es de acceso público, la diferencia con la vía "Carrera 100" es que está unos centímetros mas arriba y hay un separador que las divide. Se puede decir que esta cumpliría el objetivo de ser el tercer carril de la vía "Carrera 100"
Frans S (2021-11-26 12:50:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared., You did not square a single building !


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114237162
ThePierrasse (2021-11-30 22:27:40+00:00): Hello,

I'm pretty sure this changeset is incorrect.

The roundabout is supposed to be on the D 620 road about 80 meters south of the junction between the D 34 and the D 34a.
A small road which extends the D 34a then connects the D 620 roundabout with the D 34/D 34a intersection (not sure about its numbering though). At the D 34/D 34a intersection itself, two stop signs have been added, to give priority to the traffic coming from Obergailbach and the roundabout.

See also [here](https://cdn-s-www.republicain-lorrain.fr/images/1f729db1-ccb4-4364-bd27-0df38f59470f/NW_raw/patrick-weiten-president-du-conseil-departemental-est-venu-annoncer-le-debut-des-travaux-ce-mardi-matin-1610716582.jpg) the best picture that I could find in the local newspaper of the actual layout (the drawing in the background).

Kind regards,
ThePierrasse
clay_c (2021-12-27 17:03:43+00:00): Changeset reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115435567

The LA Metro G Line is not a guided busway. A quick read of the wiki page for busways could have prevented you from making this mistake: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
puchaczowsky (2021-11-26 18:11:39+00:00): do wycofania
Intrinsical (2021-11-29 03:38:11+00:00): Please square off the buildings when tracing them. https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114237929
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-11-29 19:56:26+00:00): Can you explain what that means and how you do that?
balint36 (2021-11-26 23:18:38+00:00): Szia! Legközelebb kérlek, légy figyelmesebb, több vasútvonalon eléggé indokolatlan cikk-cakkokat hagytál.
BubbaJuice (2021-11-25 21:13:47+00:00): Said iD changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114238402
Filip009 (2022-05-12 19:42:13+00:00): Bola Vám zmenená "cyklotrasa", pretože tam niekto nevedel prejsť. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3152864
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13480131/history
dpolovinkin (2025-05-24 15:35:46+00:00): I mean those places don't even remotely have names in Catalan, for example this one don't have wikidata name in ca for it- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/868941504, why did you add them here and whats the source?
jmaspons (2025-05-25 17:22:05+00:00): It does have Catalan name in wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q14621380. There is even a wikipedia page https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vruda 

Apart from the Vruda case, what do you thing it's wrong here?
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:31:01+00:00): ah, I see, but still in any way doesn't change the fact that a small village in Russia don't have a real name in anything other than Russian, like for real where is Catalonia and where is Leningradskaya Oblast in Russia lol...? At least Ukrainian name can have some meaning to it as languages are similar and countries are close

And you can create a wiki page and "a name" for any remote village in like Thailand in, say, Hungarian language, doesn't mean there is a real name for it in this language apart from just using English name or smth close to it, or am I wrong? And I see you already got an account block for this exact reason quite recently...
jmaspons (2025-05-31 08:45:51+00:00): So what determines if a name in Catalan is real or not? IMO, what is clear is that writing Вруда in a Catalan text would make most of the Catalan speakers doesn't know how to read it, and a wise translator would use the Vruda form. The same applies to name:en. The rules are in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names and the real question is to determine when a name exists in other languages or not. Do you have a proposal for a criterion here?

This kind of improvements in the OSM db allows projects such as https://www.openstreetmap.cat/#map=13/59.4231/29.3045 or using the maps with the user language in apps like OsmAnd.

For the block of my account it was for a suspected automatic edits which were not the case and neither for this changeset. If you try the editor I used (https://github.com/OSM-Catalan/LangToolsOSM), you would see that every edit have to be reviewed and confirmed by the user. I opened an appeal to the DWG (Ticket#2024080610000223) where I provided all the details and I'm waiting for a response.
Lee Carré (2021-11-26 14:10:26+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
3ngineer (2024-01-06 02:43:14+00:00): Hello, in this changeset, you added unclosed ways tagged as boundary. The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006279722 seems to connect two creeks. What is your source for this? These don't seem to actually connect.
Arctic gnome (2024-01-10 17:47:18+00:00): I suspect the line used to be part of a relation I created for zones described in the Tsawwassen Nation treaty. But most treaty relations have been removed in BC, so this way isn't needed anymore.
BikeForestExplorer (2022-07-30 14:48:57+00:00): зверніть увагу, що ваші зміщення доріг зроблені неправильно, без перевірки за допомогою GPS треків (strava heatmap) чи реальних заїздів. Доводиться відновлювати
Frans S (2021-11-26 12:48:31+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114239247
trigpoint (2021-11-28 18:43:22+00:00): Hi
I am not sure this change from doctors to clinic. In UK terms this is certainly a doctors (doctors surgery). What prompted you to make this change?

I am aware that some recent changes to the clinic wiki page are confusing, but it does not fit the UK consensus.

Clinic is something that varies greatly between different healthcare systems. 10 doctors is certainly not a large number in a public health system as in the UK.

The wiki is supposed to document how mappers map, not define tagging especially as in this case it changes 13 years of tag usage.

I would suggest this is returned to doctors.

Cheers Phil
Mapd123 (2021-11-29 17:21:15+00:00): I will return it to a doctors.
trigpoint (2021-11-29 17:28:26+00:00): Thank you
TreeTracks (2021-12-09 09:04:52+00:00): Hello Leon, I noticed that this edit changed the town name from “Mortlake” to “Mortlake Post Office”. I haven’t edited POs before but I wonder if the PO and locality tags should be entered separately? Many thanks for all your work on OSM. Cheers TreeTracks.
Leon K (2021-12-09 10:33:34+00:00): Good Catch, thanks for pointing that out.   
I hadn't noticed that the town and post office were merged.  I've separated them in the latest change.
Marek-M (2021-12-13 19:23:35+00:00): Cześć,
Ten węzeł oznaczyłeś jako paczkomat InPost:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9284211602

Jest to jednak punkt odbioru przesyłek, który nie pasuje pod to tagowanie. Nie wiem jak powinno być oznakowane tego typu miejsce ale na pewno nie pasuje tutaj 'amenity=vending_machine'.
Frans S (2021-11-26 12:47:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114239533