piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
letihu (2016-12-15 11:29:37+00:00): Hallo,
schön das Du hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4512447419/history
Tore gemappt hast. Ich hab sie mal mit dem Weg verbunden. Das ist wichtig, damit Navis diese auch sehen ;-)
Flow1337 (2016-12-22 14:46:03+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für die Verbesserung. Wenn neue Satelitenbilder verfügbar sind, werden hier noch weitere Anpassungen nötig werden, da Teile der Straße Steinwiese aufgrund der Tore nicht für den öffentlichen Verkehr befahrbar sein wird. Allerdings weiß ich auch noch nicht wie dies am einfachsten geht (ohne die Straße zu löschen und neu zu zeichnen) :D
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
aceman444 (2021-03-29 22:55:30+00:00): Zdravim, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3073840517 zase zmena na kriz, aj ked tam ziadny nie je? Mate chybny zdroj (aj ked stale ziadny neuvadzate).
py_berrard (2017-05-29 21:08:40+00:00): Que signifie cette note ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1139062354
romanh (2016-11-21 20:11:50+00:00): Hallo BeakKK,
darf ich Dich bitten solche Massenedits zu unterlassen. Es hat durchaus einen Grund, dass alte Tag (zusätzlich zum neuen) power=cable_distribution_cabinet noch vorhanden ist. Wir verwenden OSM zum erstellen von Feuerwehr-Einsatzakten. - Ein wildes Korrigieren von Tags ist nicht unbedingt sinnvoll.
freundliche Grüsse
Roman Härdi
Beat Kaeser (2016-11-29 19:20:41+00:00): Sorry Roman
JOSM hat mir das erst als Warning angezeigt und dann noch als Fix angeboten. Da konnte ich mir nicht mehr vorstellen, was daran noch ein Problem sein könnte.
Beat
dieterdreist (2017-05-01 22:08:28+00:00): You have inserted every hall as its own philharmonic theatre and tourism attraction. Both does not seem corresponding to reality. Maybe the Parco della Musica can be considered a tourist attraction as a whole, certainly not every single stage as its own. Please fix.
ulrich_ (2017-05-23 19:05:53+00:00): I did not mark any hall as a tourism attraction, as you can see in the history. This was done by other users more than four years ago. So please feel free to change or contact the appropriate user. I certainly agree that (if any) only the centre itself should be tagged as tourism=attraction.
If you know a better tag for an auditorium than amenity=theatre and theatre:genre=philharmonic/chamber_music/etc., than please feel free to change. I refer to the discussion http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dconcert_hall
dieterdreist (2017-05-24 11:29:55+00:00): You're right, you didn't put the attraction tags here (you could have removed them, but that wouldn't justify a changeset comment probably). Excuse me.
PT-53 (2016-11-20 19:49:25+00:00): Hallo rza31,
Du hast in Riedlingen verschiedene Ergänzungen / Berichtigungen vorgenommen, die mehrheitlich i.O. sind.
Die Löschung der Adresse am Geb. 12 Altheimer Str.(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243553805/history)  verstehe ich aber nicht. Auch nicht das Verschieben des POI-Noide des Autohauses (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/332444582#map=19/48.15359/9.46736). Dieser war korrekt auf dem Firmengelände zentral plaziert (Das Gebäude südl. gehört auch dazu).
Grüße aus Oberschwaben
PT-53
PT-53 (2016-11-21 16:14:31+00:00): Hallo rza31,
Du hast ja o.g. Punkte zwischenzeitlich rücjgängig gemacht. Gut. Eine Rückmeldung wäre aber schön gewesen.
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-02-12 13:14:03+00:00): Hallo rza31,
in OSMsuspect werden jetzt Hinweise auf unvollständige Adressen angezeigt:
https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/#18/48.15401/9.47381/osm-wrongcity-minimalmissing-wrongstreet-outsideplz
Kümmerst Du Dich darum oder muß ich das machen ?
rza31 (2017-02-12 18:35:43+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

du musst die fehlenden Adressen nicht beseitigen. Da wir uns in einem Freiwilligen-Projekt befinden kann dies jeder.

VG rza31
PT-53 (2017-02-13 08:02:42+00:00): Hallo rza31,
bereinigst Du Deine Fehler, ja oder nein ?
rza31 (2017-02-13 13:39:31+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
nur zwei Beispiele https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230272384/ 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246008041

Gefundene Fehler dürfen ohne Nachfrage bei mir beseitigt werden.
woodpeck (2016-11-28 01:29:54+00:00): Many of the buildings added in this changeset intersect water areas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454731131) or streets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454731761). Since you claim that you traced these almost 3,000 buildings from aerial imagery, how come you did not spot these errors?
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
sperlingskauz (2018-02-16 19:46:51+00:00): Dear HamidReza Fallah,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=1 in height=1, probably it was just a typo. For more details see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height .
Regards,
sperlingskauz
*Martin* (2016-12-10 08:38:59+00:00): http://pasteboard.co/83eUxPLYX.png

podarilo sa ti rozbit less pri BB. skusim opravit.
Mirecnet (2016-12-10 20:53:40+00:00): Fuuha.... Nevsimol som si pri uprave a nechtiac.... Moja chyba. Oprav to. Dik
Mirecnet (2016-12-10 21:00:20+00:00): Cela ta oblast v OSM volako cudne svetiekuje pri zoomovani na zeleno a bielo. Nevies preco ? Dufam, ze nie pre tu moju chybu :)
*Martin* (2016-12-10 21:01:34+00:00): Ano, pre tu chybu. Trochu to trva kym to OSM cele prerenderuje hoci som mu pomohol.
Mirecnet (2016-12-11 08:45:49+00:00): Dik moc za opravu. Neviem, ako k tomu dakym nedopatrenim doslo. Dam si nabuduce vacsi pozor.
de vries (2017-01-23 18:13:34+00:00): Hoi stevebeer,
Ik heb de panden die jij hier getekend hebt samengevoegd met panden die ik uit de BAG geïmporteerd heb. Deze manier van werken kost echter meer tijd dan importeren als er nog geen panden staan. Daarnaast heb jij er zelf ook veel tijd in gestoken. 
Ik denk dat het (voor iedereen) het makkelijkst is om in het vervolg als je panden op de kaart wilt een verzoekje op het forum te plaatsen. Degelijke verzoeken worden doorgaans binnen een paar uur vervuld door iemand die over de update plugin beschikt.

Happy mapping!
joost schouppe (2016-11-22 17:37:35+00:00): Vous aviez dupliqué le chemin, pas ajouté info au chemin existante. Je l'ai corrigé. Apres, vous avez faite des changes pareille du facon correcte, donc pas de probleme.
joost schouppe (2016-11-24 10:53:08+00:00): J'ai pris vos ajouts du batiment, et je les ai mis au polygone de la complexe scholaire:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40944489
Le batimant at seulement besoin d'infos extras en cas ou par example il y a differents adresses.
Hjart (2016-11-21 09:43:54+00:00): Bemærk venligst at af hensyn til historikken for de enkelte objekter er det bedst at justere eksisterende objekter frem for at slette og tegne nye (som jeg kan se du har gjort flere steder her.
literan (2016-11-21 13:06:49+00:00): Обновите карты. Памятник (а не монумент) давно нанесен.
joost schouppe (2016-11-24 07:58:33+00:00): J'ai corrigé les heurs d'ouvertures un peut. Les regles sont ici: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Et j'ai utilisé pour le faire:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Karthoo (2016-11-21 11:31:09+00:00): Hello erik76, 
thank you for adding all these Strade Provinciali in Napoli, but can you please tell me your source? Because most of these roads seem to be downgraded to Strade Comunali after the official "Approvazione Stradario 2015 della Città Metropolitana di Napoli"(http://www.cittametropolitana.na.it/-/approvazione-stradario-2015-della-citta-metropolitana-di-napoli-?inheritRedirect=true)!
Karthoo (2016-11-21 11:31:57+00:00): Okay, not most, but a lot of ;-)
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
hoream_telenav (2017-04-04 06:30:11+00:00): Hello Eric, I saw that you changed my geometry on new shopping center in Santa Clara. I think you changed it according with Bing Imagery. I made geometry based on this source: https://www.irvinecompany.com/images/Santa-Clara-Square-map.jpg. Can you confirm my source is wrong, and your geometry is right? Thank you. Horea
eric22 (2017-04-04 08:46:59+00:00): Yes, I probably relied on Bing Imagery (I don't have any other knowledge of the area). If you know more, then edit as you please, I won't touch it. Keep in mind, most of the buildings in that picture say "Future" so they may not exist yet. Also, if you make changes, please add a note to the buildings saying "Bing is out of date, new buildings were constructed here" or similar so nobody else makes the same mistake.
hoream_telenav (2017-04-04 08:52:23+00:00): Thank you for your fast reply Eric. If I remember well on building which were in this source: https://www.irvinecompany.com/images/Santa-Clara-Square-map.jpg I added a construction status. Can you please revert your changeset:43833338. I don't want to add them again. Thank for your advice related to notes/comments. I'll keep in mind, and add this info in my feature edits.have a nice day
eric22 (2017-04-04 08:55:41+00:00): I'll try to get to this soon - send me a private message in a couple days if I haven't
eric22 (2017-04-07 09:37:03+00:00): I just looked into this. Reverting a changeset looks more complicated than I want to try on my own. Feel free to do it yourself or get someone else to do it.
Øukasz (2017-08-17 10:28:11+00:00): Why do you remove tags with transliterated names? Are they actually wrong, or do you not need them?
ڕاستی (2017-08-18 23:37:34+00:00): They are actually wrong.
dudka (2016-11-22 15:43:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6725486 - для чого потрібен цей мультиполігон без тегів? перевірте його будь ласка
VARVAR8 (2017-03-29 22:01:41+00:00): виправив
maraf24 (2016-11-21 21:07:42+00:00): Nie, tak nie nie może być. NIkt tego nie znajdzie.
Sklep musi być jako sklep, czyli musi być tag shop.
Z tym, że informacja, że jest jakiś sklep, też nic nie daje. Trzeba określić rodzaj sklepu.
Jako nazwa powinna być tylko nazwa sklepu. Opis "sklep" jest zbędny przy tagu shop, bo on wprost mówi, że to sklep.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:shop
andrzejszczep (2016-11-21 21:52:59+00:00): Dziękuję. Już zmieniłem wcześniej dodając punkt. Czy tak może być? Zgodnie z radą dodałem odpowiedni tag. Pierwotna wersja (z założenia chwilowa) wynikała z tego że po edycji budynku w programie JOMS, dodaniu klucza "shop" i wartości "yes" oraz przesłaniu na serwer, na finalnej mapie nie pojawiał się obrys budynku tylko fioletowa kropka.
andrzejszczep (2016-11-21 21:58:45+00:00): Opcja punktu nie aktualna.
andrzejszczep (2016-11-21 21:59:18+00:00): Powinno być ok teraz.
maraf24 (2016-11-21 22:18:45+00:00): Fioletowa kropka oznacza sklep. Ikony pojawiają się tylko dla niektórych sklepów (tych popularnych), reszcie pozostaje kropka. 
Ikon mogłoby być więcej, ale trzeba je narysować, a nie ma za bardzo chętnych. No i nie jest to łatwe.
andrzejszczep (2016-11-21 23:45:21+00:00): Problem w tym, że była tylko kropka, bez budynku choć w trybie edycji budynek był widoczny. Tak chyba być nie powinno i gdzieś był błąd. Ikonki koszyka widzę na sklepach w sąsiednich miejscowościach. Nie jestem informatykiem ale wydaje mi się to dziwne że trzeba je oddzielnie nanosić. Myślałem że odbywa się to automatycznie, jeśli tylko ktoś wybierze tag sklep.
maraf24 (2016-11-21 23:50:08+00:00): Jeśli widać coś w edycji, ale nie na mapie, to:
-tego obiektu ta mapa w ogóle nie pokazuje
-mapa się jeszcze nie odświeżyła (naciśnięcie F5 zwykle pomaga)
Sklep może być razem z budynkiem albo jako osobny punkt. Nie ma to zazwyczaj znaczenia.
cartolinguaphile (2016-11-20 23:35:04+00:00): Sorry, that should be houses 542–544. Vespucci doesn't let me see the map at the same time as writing a changeset comment.
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.
Josef73 (2018-11-18 08:08:15+00:00): Hello, is your shop every day open?
trigpoint (2016-11-21 12:52:54+00:00): Hi, is this really a hotel? The name suggests self catering holiday cottages.
muralito (2016-11-21 02:20:17+00:00): Jose, el 1427 esta en el padron siguiente, al lado.
¿El 1419 no existe?
BCNorwich (2016-11-28 09:44:06+00:00): Hello There,
You've made some really good additions to OpenStreetMap, I'm sure the community appreciates that. 
The latest additions/alterations however are a bit silly so I have reverted those changes.
Regards
literan (2016-11-30 16:32:14+00:00): вы здесь (по крайней мере, на Бескудниковском бульваре), увы, подвинули все от выравненного по верному смещению, совпадающему с адресным реестром и внесенного в базу данных смещений, на какое-то НЕПРАВИЛЬНОЕ (в базе такого вообще нет). Двигаю обратно...(
Alexander-II (2016-11-30 21:50:21+00:00): а уточните где именно на Бескудниковском (например в каком микрорайоне). не отрицаю, что мог опростоволоситься, но проверяю смещение по gps трекам
Alexander-II (2016-11-30 21:58:03+00:00): Там еще в какой-то момент снимки от другого времени начинаются. Вот там не особо совпадать может. а все, что к западу от "разлома", там у меня смещение -1,79;-4,58 или около того. И еще подскажите, где упомянутая вами база данных смещений находится
Alexander-II (2016-11-30 22:04:46+00:00): Посмотрел этот пакет правок с указанным выше смещением и прям все четенько :) и направления движений у gps-треков с разделительной линией совпадают, и конторы домов по их основанию на снимке выровнены: что на 800 летия, что на софьи ковалевской
literan (2016-12-01 07:42:53+00:00): я про 9 м-н Бескудниково. Там теперь, да, все совпадает. Вы же юзаете JOSM - база смещений в плагине imagery_offset_db. Там забиты смещения, и для голубоватого снимка, и для более старого, того, что восточнее. Еще рекомендую слой адресного реестра подключить (это легальный источник адрески): это TMS-слой, адрес tms:http://trolleway.nextgis.com/api/component/render/tile?z={z}&x={x}&y={y}&resource=42,45
literan (2016-12-01 07:45:46+00:00): кстати, если выравнивать по трекам, то надо брать магистральные улицы, их пересечения, где большая плотность треков.
Alexander-II (2016-12-01 08:07:10+00:00): Возьму на заметку и то и другое. Спасибо. Но есть сомнения насчет актуальности данных и там и там :) Глянул по району и смещения не идеал, и в адресном реестре снесенный жилищный фонд никуда не делся
literan (2016-12-01 08:21:39+00:00): ну, снесенное-то снесенным, актуальность там не самая лучшая, но выровнены домики довольно точно - это говорили серьезные товарищи с форума.
Ale_Zena_IT (2016-11-21 10:17:51+00:00): Ciao,
ti consiglierei di inserire i nomi senza abbreviazione (Azienda Agricola ...) così quando uno straniero guarda la mappa ha più facilità a capirla.
gambadavide (2016-11-21 11:50:40+00:00): Ciao,
scusami ma sono nuovo del mestiere.
Provvedo in questi giorni a modificare le descrizioni come da tuo suggerimento.

Grazie.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 10:53:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did have the "Coalter Way“ any connection to „N Arcadia Ave“?
Ricardo Accioly (2016-11-21 14:44:47+00:00): Well, when N Arcadia ends, is when coater connects with it, at the same time it is connecting with Dekalb Industrial Way
user_5359 (2016-11-21 14:57:37+00:00): done!
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 19:15:39+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've added some things to the middle of the Indian Ocean.  Are you using "geoMapTool" for that?  If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.
Please contact OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group in data@osmfoundation.org so that we can explain the problem in more detail.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
nammala (2016-11-21 05:00:32+00:00): Hi Maximus Sayan,

May I know the reason and source for adding these names to the roads.

regards,
nammala
MaximusSayan (2016-11-21 11:43:23+00:00): its the real name from the province of quebec.

http://www.sepaq.com/rf/por/
nammala (2016-11-21 12:07:21+00:00): Thanks for getting back. It would be great if you can add it in the source when you upload to OpenStreetMap.

Regards,
nammala
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 13:21:12+00:00): For info, in Lithuania I'd strongly suggest that you contact the local community, based on a complaint to a previous wikidata-adder in the area: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40498313
ngturner (2016-11-21 03:04:33+00:00): Poor description. Actually removed streets that have been eliminated due to development.
manoharuss (2016-11-21 07:49:57+00:00): Hi jun hyuck kim,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have been giving korean names in name:en tag. name:en tag is for english. Please correct your edits. Korean names can be given in name:ko tag. Feel free to reply.



Best,
Manohar
poornibadrinath (2016-11-23 05:52:45+00:00): Hi Alvin Chin,
  I came  across your edits and noticed you have added attraction tag for addresses. Please note attraction tag is for tourism related pois like museums, or any other important place and not adresses. Please change the tags or all the changesets will have to be reverted.
Thank you,
Poornima Badrinath
user_5359 (2016-11-21 11:01:22+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:11:58+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 11:05:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:10:52+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 11:06:23+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:10:06+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
andrewpmk (2016-11-21 15:38:57+00:00): I am pretty sure that the Highway 12 designation goes a bit south of Highway 407 and that there is a Highway 12 ends sign posted a bit south of there (or was before the 407 opened). Has this changed?
GerdP (2017-09-05 14:40:37+00:00): Moin!
Mir ist hier ein highway=services
aufgefallen, der wohl eigentlich ein highway=service sein sollte. Allerdings frage ich mich, ob die Zufahrt nicht viel eher durch den Parkplatz führen sollte.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454811407
ste (2017-09-05 16:28:54+00:00): Sorry, das ist natürlich ein Fehler. Behoben und durch den Parkplatz durchgeführt. Vl. kann mal jemand der wieder mal vor Ort ist überprüfen ob man Richtung Westen auch wirklich rausfahren darf.
GerdP (2017-09-05 16:39:43+00:00): Danke, Ich bin zwar dieses Jahr mit dem Rad in der Gegend gewesen, aber kann mich nicht erinnern ;-)
Vintagejhan (2016-11-21 14:31:50+00:00): 這個水溝有很大條嗎?
Supaplex (2016-11-21 14:54:55+00:00): 山溝等級
user_5359 (2016-11-21 11:13:30+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:08:21+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
letihu (2017-02-15 07:46:35+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4513274978/history#map=19/49.35359/7.09739&layers=N
kommt mit jedem Update ein zusätzlicher Hydrant dazu. Nun sind es schon 5 Stück, pro Stelle. Über 50 weitere Punkte sind betroffen.

Vorherigen Änderungssätze:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43240560
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43240560
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43839936#map=15/49.3561/7.0994&layers=N
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43839936
aceman444 (2016-11-27 21:16:07+00:00): Dobry den, tie palace co prerabate na historic=castle by mohli mat aspon aj nejaky castle_type, aby to nevyzeralo ako hrady, co nie su. Okrem toho uspesne zmizli z mapy, lebo ste mi odstranili znacku building.

Na wiki tam building ma zostat ak ide o jednu budovu (teda nie je budova zakreslena inym objektom, asi to funguje podobne ako napr. areal pri amenity=school)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcastle

Prosim rychlo to poopravujte len je Stare mesto na osm.org uplne derave.
literan (2016-11-21 13:08:23+00:00): федеральной миграционной службы уже полгода нет... и office=administrative давно deprecated. поправлю на верные теги, но вот что там теперь... какие-то подразделения МВД, вероятно?
sirorezka (2016-11-21 14:23:26+00:00): Да, я что-то живу прошлым, их всех упразднили, и они стали частью МВД. А УФМС теперь заменяют отделы по работы с миграцией: 
https://77.xn--b1aew.xn--p1ai/ms/Otdeli_migracii_po_AO/zao    

При этом сайт немного запаздывает и информации о районных отделах нет. Можно лишь предположить, что они на месте старых ОУФМС. 

В общем, я успел уже сгоряча удалить обе точки. )
sirorezka (2016-11-21 14:27:18+00:00): Вот, например, госуслуги ещё не оправились от этого шока и неверно указывают, что отдел по району Дорогомилово находится в Европейском: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/structure/10002426190

Хотя в этом что-то есть символическое.
literan (2016-11-21 15:19:09+00:00): (с) пора валить
aceman444 (2016-11-27 21:18:35+00:00): Dobry den, posuvat umelo objekty kvoli "lepsej viditelnosti na mape" (ktorej?) nie je velmi stastne, aj tak to kazda zobrazuje inak. Ale pokial je bod stale v ramci arealu restauracie, tak este OK.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 11:19:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:08:55+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Vyacheslav Shadrin (2016-11-21 08:45:43+00:00): Relation 6718863 was replaced with 6718862
Vyacheslav Shadrin (2016-11-21 08:44:40+00:00): Relation 6718862 was fixed
Hjart (2016-11-21 09:38:22+00:00): Please note that this is not for private bookmarks
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-19 12:43:39+00:00): Why you added demolished=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336966681 ?