piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-19 13:48:52+00:00): ruas planejadas excluidas
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-19 13:49:47+00:00): muitas vezes elas nunca são construidas de fato
1998alexkane (2022-04-22 13:03:04+00:00): Hi! I just wanted to say that I'm somewhat skeptical of putting the route name on the individual ways) In general, as The "Oak Leaf Trail South Shore Line" is the route name, and isn't the name of each individual trail segment. (Also, it can get messy when a way is part of two cycle routes, such as the Brown Deer Trail/Zip Line.)

Let me know what you think!
BPTT (2022-04-22 14:21:50+00:00): Good point. Perhaps we could use the "alt_name" tag and include both relevant Relations? Thankfully there are very few trails that double - I'm thinking of the City-owned Beerline vs. the County-owned Beerline segments. Or do you mean that we should strike the Line name in favor of making all ways simply "Oak Leaf Trail"? I'm not in favor of this latter option because it's not as specific as it could be. Or do you mean simply striking all paths' Names (field & tag) and only IDing them by their Relations? That could work, and would declutter the ways' name labels when zoomed far in.
1998alexkane (2022-04-23 09:17:44+00:00): I had a look at some of the established practice, and I think the name fields should just be empty. The route names are just that: the names of the routes.
BPTT (2022-04-24 17:05:48+00:00): But wouldn't this conflict with the actual on-the-ground wayfinding signs that exist usually at intersections of path and path?
1998alexkane (2022-04-24 17:32:33+00:00): I don't think so. These are route markers IMO (at least all the ones I have seen) In any case, these signs also refer to city streets, and we aren't giving South Honey Creek Parkway the alt_name of "Oak Leaf Trail Kinnickinnic Line", for example
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 01:35:46+00:00): The main street here was never called Urell Way, I drove down here 2 weeks ago and didn't find a Urell Way, instead i found Kovachik Boulevard. This whole neighbourhood was missing so i added it
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Retired Account (2022-04-18 11:09:21+00:00): This change incorrect changes a building:part to become a building way, and duplicates the building. The previous tagging is correct.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826116489
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 01:38:49+00:00): On OpenStreetMap this street is an extension of Dufay Road, but the street sign says otherwise. It is actually called Kent Road
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 01:58:13+00:00): 
Even the city acknowledges it is called Idell Avenue: See Here https://www.myselkirk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CityRouteMap.pdf
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 01:58:36+00:00): oops wrong changeset
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 01:59:21+00:00): just ignore the comment, two comments above this one, it is related to another changeset
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 01:55:18+00:00): This was listed as an extension of Manchester, but the street sign says otherwises, I drove down here and the street leading to the nursing home is indeed called Idell Avenue, not at all Manchester Avenue
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 01:56:11+00:00): This was listed as an extension of Manchester, but the street sign says otherwises, I drove down here and the street leading to the nursing home is indeed called Idell Avenue, not at all Manchester Avenue
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 01:59:35+00:00): Even the city acknowledges it is called Idell Avenue: See Here https://www.myselkirk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CityRouteMap.pdf
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 02:00:35+00:00): This is just proof it is indeed called Idell Avenue, not the alien, non-existing extension of Manchester Avenue
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
nevw (2022-04-18 02:28:16+00:00): The name is Bowls not Bowels as in their website url
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_5359 (2022-04-18 05:48:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5015908237 over 100 meters, please check the position.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 02:27:39+00:00): This neighbourhood was missing, I added all the street names and streets that were missing but are under construction right now
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 02:42:13+00:00): Added another missing new development, Street names confirmed by surveying.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Rico557 (2022-04-18 06:41:31+00:00): А по факту, нет ведь никакой гарантии, что эти товарищи вносят номера квартир правильно. В поле они явно не работают судя по ошибкам и не обозначенным на подъездах номерах квартир(как в этом доме). Может тут с южной стороны 1-20, как например в доме через Лимож и Пегас?
4004 (2022-04-19 22:57:54+00:00): по факту - без понятия. не пойман - не лор, и так далее.
вообще, ошибки и пропущенные подьезды еще не означают, что на земле они не были - может, торопились или не заметили.
не вешать же на каждый такой подьезд фиксми=сурвей?
4004 (2022-04-19 22:58:45+00:00): самое грустное, что эти подьезды я даже проезжал с мапиллари, но табличек на них не видно было..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Violaine_Do (2022-12-07 21:03:02+00:00): attention aux doublons le centre de plongée était en double ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119835915
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-21 00:01:58+00:00): Please don't add hole number to the name
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 02:52:50+00:00): I used to go here to do gym, there is a street sign there that says Abe & Fan Simkin Circle
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 02:55:13+00:00): I pass by here all the time, there is a street sign here that says Platinum Jets Way
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 02:59:42+00:00): This street actually is Batoche Avenue, I Drove by here a few years ago and there was a street sign there, the text read BATOCHE AVE
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 03:01:32+00:00): Wolseley West Avenue never existed, it was always Wolseley Avenue West, The street sign reads Wolseley Ave W
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Allison P (2022-04-19 20:42:06+00:00): Really, only between Five Mile and Eagle? In any case, seems you missed a couple spots. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2991979
Gfeich (2022-04-19 21:06:27+00:00): No, it extends west to Cloverdale, I just haven't had time to add that section yet. And I think the tiles for the bit I missed haven't updated yet; I checked it early today and couldn't find what needs removed.
Diacritic (2022-04-18 05:58:28+00:00): Hey Mitch. :)

Just saw this edit and noticed it will cause issues for routing software. When drawing dual carriageway intersections, its best to draw the lanes as a "box" rather than crossing them as an "X". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway#How_to_map
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119836393
mitchef (2022-04-18 08:07:01+00:00): Hi Diacritic
Yeah it's a strange one. Nothing really lines up. Simplified it now in #119844114
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 03:45:23+00:00): fixed up some road outlines so that i could add roads from the new South Cornell Community.
https://www.countrywidehomes.ca/community/southcornell/#:~:text=South%20Cornell%20is%20the%20collaborative,have%20the%20best%20of%20Cornell.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 04:08:08+00:00): There are street signs on this property that say Red Delicious Lane and Northern Spy Way, i double checked to make sure they were correct before adding