piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:57:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:33:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
borishag (2022-03-17 08:12:42+00:00): Hi, You placed the node of the Kruidvat shop in an incorrect position. Can you please put the node of Kruidvat back to it's original position?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:08:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
abakus_uploader (2022-03-17 23:31:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MapperMudkip (2022-05-01 03:54:23+00:00): Just a heads up that rails with no visible traces should be tagged as razed, not abandoned. So for example, the roundhouse track would qualify. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
literan (2022-03-17 15:50:24+00:00): это не отношение, а обычный полигон, поэтому этот тег здесь не нужен. Уберу.

Отношение это особый класс объектов, состоящих из нескольких линий/полигонов или точек. Мультиполигон - подвид отношений. Например, вот это отношение типа мультиполигон https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7625645

Это отношение типа маршрут (route) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7690718
ndm (2022-04-09 22:25:30+00:00): It's not strictly a motorway services -- you can access it from the A-roads -- there's even a footpath that looks like it should connect to the services in the north-east.
ticki_52 (2023-02-04 16:00:44+00:00): Hallo, Hausstromzuleitungen zu mappen ist ein recht ambitioniertes Projekt....  Habe Deinen Ansatz von vor einem Jahr beseitigt....

Gruß tick:i_52
user_5359 (2022-03-30 13:38:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag etages = 7 ? Did you mean building:levels (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels)? But this information ist part of the building way.
user_5359 (2022-03-18 17:55:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/1085528. The value of the key building:levels (the better key for the non standard key étages) is different 7<>6. I remove your entry.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-17 20:50:29+00:00): Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118610609 jako edycja Temat-Droga zmieniająca klasyfikacje dróg bez podania przyczyny
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-17 20:52:56+00:00): Patrząc na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=tertiary nie pojmuje o co chodzi.

Trasa Brzeg-Dolny do Legnicy nie ma znaczenia większego niż regionalne.

Nawet droga z Wołowa przez Lubiąż jest wysoce wątpliwa.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:33:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:36:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
lefuturiste (2023-11-15 09:48:29+00:00): Image hosted by mapillary is no longer accessible, I'm getting a 404
philippec (2023-11-15 11:07:34+00:00): It is back again.
Such things happen.
TrickyFoxy (2022-03-26 11:42:26+00:00): 👋 Вы указываете слишком высокий класс дорог. Подробнее: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118581881
TrickyFoxy (2022-03-26 11:44:17+00:00): И ещё. Не рисуйте дороги поверх существующих
TrickyFoxy (2022-03-26 12:08:11+00:00): Если существующие дороги слишком длинные -- нажмите правой кнопкой мыши в точке в которой хотите разделить и нажмите разделить
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118581881
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
tux67 (2022-03-17 09:55:39+00:00): Beim Löschen einer Linie wie hier solltest du dir bewusst sein, dass du damit auch den Bezug zu einer oder mehreren Relationen entfernst. Das können Buslinien, Rad und Wanderwege sein.
In diesem Fall ist aber nichts passiert, da die Relation zur L19 nur indirekt betroffen war.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118582045
eggie (2022-03-17 10:18:21+00:00): Dag Cruysen.. Je vraagt feedback.
Even gekeken. noexit=yes hoorde daar inderdaad niet. 
Op de Kruithoorn heb ik ze ook verwijderd.. Er is immers gewoon een doorgang voor tweewielers. 

Bij  de kruising Pastoor Jacobsstraat is de fietsknooppuntroute onderbroken. Je kunt met editor iD geen fietsroutes bewerken. Ik kijk even of het simpel te herstellen is.
Routerelaties kun je alleen bewerken met editor JOSM.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-17 10:25:10+00:00): Even terug in de historie gekeken. Het kwam niet door jouw actie.  Ik ga even freubelen om het goed te krijgen en anders vraag ik wel aan de route expert.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-17 10:39:11+00:00): Fietsroute is hersteld..  

Kijk eens naar Josm
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 Voor het geval je weer iets tegenkomt waar rpouterelaties lopen. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-17 11:01:25+00:00): De ingang van het kerkpad ontdaan van oneway=yes  Je kunt anders nooit meer van die parkeerplaats afkomen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:34:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:33:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
eggie (2022-03-17 10:31:03+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. Zo te zien was het goed gemapt. Op de luchtfoto zie ik geen sloot, maar waarschijnlijk loopt daat een duiker en die tag je met tunnel=culvert layer=-1  Is dat inmiddels dan opengegraven? 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118582575

Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-17 10:31:34+00:00): Kijk je nog even, want ik denk dat het welk degelijk  een duiker is.
tux67 (2022-03-17 09:47:48+00:00): Hallo Daniel579360,
bevor du weitermappst .. private Gärten solltenb nicht bei OSM gemappt werden - erst recht nicht wie initial als Park.
Vielleicht schaust du in die https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice und bei Verwendung neuer Tags empfieht sich eine Lektüre des Wiki vorab.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118582701
tux67 (2022-03-17 09:58:55+00:00): Kleiner Zusatz - insbesondere den Garten für den auch das name Tag zu verwenden ist ein großes no,no!
Bei OSM werden namen nicht zur Beschreibung verwendet, sondern NUR echte Namen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118582701
tux67 (2022-03-17 10:01:16+00:00): Weiterhin - redundante Adressdaten sind nicht erwünscht. de Hausnummer reicht an einem Gebäude.
Daniel579360 (2022-03-17 10:44:01+00:00): OK, danke und verstanden.

Und...sorry  :-)
tux67 (2022-03-17 10:49:44+00:00): Kein Problem .. bei Fragen immer her damit .. 
Solltest du aus Gerderath kommen und bei einem Spaziergang noch fehlende Hausnummern einsammeln wollen, hätte ich hier noch eine kleine Abfrage für dich:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gWl
wkdgs (2022-04-26 12:22:58+00:00): Ich finde schon, dass man die Flächen von privaten Gärten mit "leisure=garden" mappen kann. Also nur die Fläche selbst. Details darüber ,was sich im Garten befindet, natürlich nicht.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118582701
tux67 (2022-04-26 12:32:44+00:00): wenn es sich um einen privaten Garten handelt, der nicht öffentlich zugänglich ist, das ist die Information für die Allgemeinheit ziemlich uninteressant. Wenn man aber denke ausgerechtnet dieser Garten müsse aber unbedingt in OSM, dann  sollte man zumindest access rights ( access=private ) nutzen und das name Feld sollte - egal ob Garten oder etwas anderes - nie beschreibend genutzt werden.

Gruß
tux67
FrankOverman (2022-07-18 13:23:55+00:00): Vraagje: ik zie nu in BAG op elke molen locatie een rond nieuw gebouw in BAG: die importeren?
user_5359 (2022-03-30 11:36:21+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag OFC = primary_line?
jagjitsangha (2022-03-30 18:04:32+00:00): Optical Fiber Cable primary cable for network distribution.
user_5359 (2022-03-30 18:40:50+00:00): As far as I know, we do not yet have a classification of importance of cables in the system. However, it would be interesting to design the key name independently of the cable material.
By the way: The type key is reserved exclusively for relations.
paulbrunner (2023-03-08 07:51:19+00:00): Hi kaputaka

Quick question about this natural=water (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041074018) and the dam next to it (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041074019): I coulnd't find any aerial imagery that still shows water or a dam here, but then Esri World, Bing and Mapbox all have the same imagery here anyways. I usually use Maxar here and was wondering, could it be that this water and dam don't exist anymore? Would be great to have your input on that.

All the best,
Paul
paulbrunner (2023-03-08 07:52:57+00:00): katpatuka I mean, I somehow really butchered that...
katpatuka (2023-03-08 08:17:04+00:00): I added the reservoir using EOX cloudless Sentinel-2 2021 imagery with josm.
PT-53 (2022-03-18 06:49:23+00:00): Hallo Hexmex,
dann dürfte es dort auch neue Hausnummern geben. Du könntest dazu bei der Stadtverwaltung anfragen und um eine Liste (alt > neu) bitten.
Grüße
Hexmex (2022-03-19 17:28:37+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
das hatte ich mir auch gedacht. Inzwischen habe ich von der Stadtverwaltung eine neue Hausnummernliste bekommen. Ich werde diese die Tage noch einarbeiten
Hexmex (2022-03-21 08:45:48+00:00): Hallo PT-53, ich habe ein Hausnummernverzeichnis bekommen und die Hausnummern eingepflegt
PT-53 (2022-03-21 08:57:37+00:00): Sehr gut.
Danke und Grüße
PT-53 (2022-05-16 10:39:25+00:00): Hallo Hexmex, 
ich habe gerade in Buffenhofen Gebäude anhand Maps4BW überarbeitet. Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, daß die K 8237 von Ringgenbach bis zur K 8236 jetzt den Straßennamen Wangerstraße trägt. Müßte sich der Straßennamen nicht auf den Straßenabschnitt innerhalb von Dietershofen beschränken?
Fragende Grüße
Hexmex (2022-05-18 06:03:36+00:00): Guten Morgen PT-53,
Hast Recht.
Die Wangerstraße ist nur auf das Ortsgebiet Dietershofen beschränkt. Buffenhofen hat keine eigene Straße und in Ringgenbach ist alles die Tälestraße
Lennardderudder (2023-09-27 08:22:41+00:00): Dag dvdhoven, zou je weten of de route tussen knooppunten 55 en 67 ten westen van Beerzerveld nog volledig correct in OSM zit?
dvdhoven (2023-09-27 11:52:37+00:00): Route 55-67 hoort weer op de Zwarteweg te lopen net als de LF routes. 55-67 heeft korte tijd op de Knolsdijk gelegen. Geen succes.
Maar ik schaak op 2 borden, FB en OSM en dat schiet OSM er wel eens bij in.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
legofahrrad (2022-03-19 18:00:40+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Bitte beachte, dass Namen nur für Eigennamen verwendet werden sollen. Beschreibungen kommen nicht ins "name"-Tag, sondern zu "description".
Allerdings sind häufig nichtmal Beschreibungen notwendig, da die anderen Tags schon ausdrücken, was dort ist.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
(Ich meine hier die "Kleingartenhütte[n]", die du ergänzt hast.)

Wenn du weiter bei OSM mitwirken möchtest, kann ich dir diesen Wiki-Artikel empfehlen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei weiteren Fragen kannst du hier gerne einen Kommentar verfassen – dann weiß ich auch, dass du meinen Kommentar gelesen hast! :)

Viele Grüße!
joost schouppe (2022-06-23 07:33:15+00:00): Hi Bear,
This road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301327098 is definitely not one way! I fixed it for you.
joost schouppe (2022-04-13 15:26:58+00:00): Hi Bear-in-a-box,
You've added name=MTB/VTT singletrail to some of these paths, but the name is for the name only. That's just a description you've added. it's not needed either, since the path was alreayd mapped with some MTB tags.
The conversion from a path to a "racing track" is also not correct, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack for more info.
Now, if you were trying to add a waymarked MTB route, then some work is left to be done. It's a little complicated, but I can help you if you like
Skinfaxi (2022-03-30 14:37:43+00:00): Hej Christian,
håller Du på med NVDB import i Åtvidabergs / Kinda Kommun? kommer Du jobbar dig söderut`?
Tycker det är en jättebra initiativ!
ChristianA (2022-04-08 10:24:39+00:00): Hej. Ursäkta sent svar. Jag har tidigare importerat lite vägar från NVDB runt Björsäter, men nu gjorde jag ett gäng med den nya fina NVDB-datan som preparerats för OSM. Men i södra Åtvidaberg tappade jag orken lite; det är många  grusvägar som redan finns i OSM, men geometrin är lite sådär, så det är väldigt mycket jobb. Samtidigt drog jag igång ett annat karteringsprojekt som är närmare mitt hem, så jag vet inte om och i så fall när jag fortsätter med Åtvidaberg...
Skinfaxi (2022-04-09 14:29:06+00:00): Okay, tack för infon. Ja här är det fortfarende mycket jobb och väldigt ont om mappare. I V
sterviks kommun har jag impoterad från lantmäteriets kartor (för några år sedan), men NVDB är ju tydligen bättre.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:08:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
EMREOYUN (2022-03-18 18:43:00+00:00): Merhaba, OpenStreetMap'a hoş geldiniz. Harita katkılarınız için öncelikle çok teşekkür ederiz ve ekleyebileceğiniz başka katkılarınız varsa eklemekten çekinmeyin :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-03-18 12:14:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question about your entry: You have entered an key with a hashtag. Is this really description of the object (what is the meaning?) or "only" a label for your action?
Nicci W (2022-03-18 12:18:29+00:00): You can remove - I don't believe this was me on purpose anyway -
user_5359 (2022-03-18 12:23:35+00:00): Done! Have fun and success with OSM!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-31 13:26:01+00:00): Thank you for your contributions and huge efforts on the map
Regards
andershl (2022-05-15 10:19:05+00:00): You incorrectly changed from highway to leisure. Leisure marks a sports area, not a route. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack
Vika_Nosovich (2022-05-16 08:05:07+00:00): Hello andershl!

Thank you for pointing out my mistake and correcting it.

Best regards!
RicoElectrico (2022-09-11 17:39:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126035520
Łukasz „Siwy” (2022-09-12 19:48:10+00:00): Prośba o usunięcie znacznika, w mapach w dalszym ciągu widnieje.
cytryn (2022-09-12 21:13:43+00:00): Cierpliwości - punkt jest usunięty, ale zwykle musi minąć kilka dni zanim dane zostaną zaktualizowane w różnych aplikacjach korzystających z OSM.
Dodatkowo pytanie - czy ta apteka jest może gdzieś w okolicy? Może zamiast usuwać, warto było ją przenieść we właściwe miejsce?
Łukasz „Siwy” (2022-09-13 14:27:54+00:00): Aaaa, Ok dzięki za informacje - myślałem że jest szybciej odświeżane. Co do apteki to funkcjonowała kiedyś taka na tej samej ulicy ale pod innym numerem, niestety od dawna nie istnieje. Dziękuje za pomoc
zorglubu (2022-10-17 14:02:15+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour vos contributions. Veillez à ne pas enlever l'étiquette building=yes sur un bâtiment, même si vous ajoutez une étiquette amenity=*.
Cela reste toujours un "building"

D'autre part, il est utile pour les autres contributeurs de décrire succinctement en commentaire ce qui est fait, par exemple "ajout hôpital", et non pas "oui".   :-)

Surtout, continuez à contribuer, encore merci.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
goaned (2023-11-03 12:47:30+00:00): Hallo, bitte um Aufmerksamkeit auf diesen Hinweis: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3970902
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-03-18 08:05:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9585030303. Please check the data before importing. Can I remove this opening_hours?
user_5359 (2022-03-18 08:07:01+00:00): Same problem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9585030304
ivanbranco (2022-03-19 15:07:06+00:00): Ciao Damiano :)

se possibile le prossime volte mappa gli indirizzi come un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso/numerino, è la convenzione adottata dalla community italiana di OSM.
noelbov (2022-08-30 20:33:16+00:00): Volgens https://www.vlaanderen-fietsland.be/nl/routeplanner loopt  die route naar SP (startpunt).
Maar daar zou op het terrein geen bordje of bewegwijzering te vinden zijn.
Kunnen we die relatie dan niet beter wegdoen?

mvg
N.
noelbov (2022-04-07 13:51:08+00:00): Hallo Jakka,
Ik vind van https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13933158#map=16/50.5189/4.3706 niets terug, noch op mapillary beelden noch op andere beelden (van juli 2021) dat hier sprake is van een rcn.
Uw survey heeft blijkbaar ook geen duidelijkheid gebracht.
Moet die YYYYY-xxxxx route dan nog blijven bestaan?
mvg
Noël
Gustavo22Soares (2022-09-03 11:32:26+00:00): por favor não esqueça de esquadrinhar os edifícios para isso use a tecla Q
user_5359 (2022-03-20 06:34:50+00:00): Hello (again)! What is the meaning of the tag nedap = 112? Did you mean emergency:phone?
Router_01 (2022-03-21 06:43:44+00:00): NEDAP 112 is a transponder for emergency services used in the Netherlands.
user_5359 (2022-03-21 07:10:34+00:00): Did I understand it correctly that it is a system that the barrier opens when the emergency vehicles approach? Are there multiple systems or access levels? 
There is an access:key (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1h1a), but this would mean stopping the car to open the barrier. As an alternative I suggest an access:transponder=<yes|no|system name (if more than one system exists)>.
Router_01 (2022-03-21 07:24:53+00:00): True, there are also several levels possible I am referring to level "112". What is the best way to process this?
user_5359 (2022-03-21 07:33:55+00:00): Is level the right word (could it also be  group)? 
access:transponder:level=112 
or 
access:transponder:group=112 
would then be options
Router_01 (2022-03-21 08:35:34+00:00): It is indeed a group, I think I have add it in correctly?
user_5359 (2022-03-21 09:41:32+00:00): You changed https://www.osm.org/node/573844000, but I miss the key access:transponder=yes (access:transponder=nedap).
user_5359 (2022-03-20 06:33:28+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag nedap = 112? Did you mean emergency:phone?
Router_01 (2022-03-21 06:44:07+00:00): NEDAP 112 is a transponder for emergency services used in the Netherlands.
eggie (2022-03-21 07:24:35+00:00): Dag Router...  
, maar NEDAP is toch geen valide tag (key) volgens de conventie van OSM?

Je kunt wel description=  gebruiken om iets verder aan te duiden. 
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2022-03-21 07:27:48+00:00): @eggie: Could we discuss under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118588285?
user_5359 (2022-03-21 07:30:37+00:00): Sorry @eggie: Kunnen we discussiëren onder https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118588285?
user_5359 (2022-03-30 13:40:21+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9585173237. What is the meaning of the tag edia = fr:Enedis (copy & paste error)?