piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Matthew Darwin (2019-07-17 00:41:48+00:00): Yes, I am sure... it was built late last year.   If you want you can improve my geometry a bit as the sidewalk goes around the corners on Westview and Parkview.
Matthew Darwin (2019-07-17 00:43:36+00:00): There is also a 'sidewalk' on the south side of the road that enters the park at the end of Sebring.
saintam1 (2019-07-16 17:59:45+00:00): Hello,

The buildings you added were removed from the map last November. Someone reported they had been demolished as part of the construction work here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64911126/

Are you sure they still exist?
viloan (2019-07-16 17:20:12+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Hjart (2019-07-17 10:06:49+00:00): Jeg har slettet beskrivelsen i navnefeltet (som ikke bør bruges til andet end egentlige navne). Bemærk iøvrigt at det ikke er Google Maps du ser i editorens baggrund, men Geodatastyrelsens flyfotos fra foråret 2018
viloan (2019-07-16 17:27:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pio2_122 (2019-07-16 18:13:49+00:00): In fact this is a cemetery and park in one...
In my opinion, this fact should be somehow mentioned in tags.
Lars_Gatt (2019-07-16 18:40:40+00:00): Hello! How is a cemetery a park? According to OSM wiki a park is:
"A park is an area of open space for recreational use"
Lars_Gatt (2019-07-16 18:44:34+00:00): Please refer to:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
pio2_122 (2019-07-16 18:58:11+00:00): This cemetery is something between the park and botanical garden.
It has many paths where you can walk like in normal park, you can also sit on the bench and relax in the presence of nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Cemetery_in_Szczecin

Photos:
http://cmentarze.szczecin.pl/chapter_11984.asp
Lars_Gatt (2019-07-16 19:25:08+00:00): Thank you for sending me this information. Wikipedia states it is "like a huge park" and "similar to a big botanical garden". This is considered a cemetery and national monument, but not leisure=park or garde, which was outside of my scope for maproulette. I can update the tags to reference this as boundary=national_park or boundary=protected_area. Do you have a preference as to which tag would be more appropriate, national_park or protected_area?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dnational_park
pio2_122 (2019-07-16 19:48:25+00:00): Unfortunately, these tags in Poland refer only to legally established national parks and protected areas :/
https://www.gdos.gov.pl/forms-of-nature-protection
pio2_122 (2019-07-16 20:04:19+00:00): And yes, this cemetery doesn't appear in "Central Register of Nature Conservation Forms" = It's not formally an area of nature protection. So, we can't use these tags in this case.
Rom1 (2019-07-16 20:52:52+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce bien une adresse différente des deux adresses "34 1" et "34 2" déjà présentes ? Si oui, cette adresse correspond-elle à tout ce bâtiment ? Sur l'imagerie, il y a deux entrées. Merci d'avance.
py_berrard (2019-07-18 10:08:14+00:00): c'est bien une adresse à part, j'irai voir pour les 2 entrées
py_berrard (2019-08-14 11:19:52+00:00): donc :
c'est bien le 34bis, le bâtiment a deux entrées sans affichage particulier. Je propose de replacer le noeud d'adresse à l'entrée de la résidence (voie d'accès passant sous le bâtiment abritant les 34 1 et 2.
lucsalmons (2019-07-16 17:48:30+00:00): https://openstreetcam.org/details/1373330/1212/track-info
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=ZxKVr_TiLYHwe8wNSOJ0Aw&lat=-27.663763985063554&lng=152.91929787970423&z=17&x=0.48026404748615287&y=0.5237456550596231&zoom=0.30959752321981426
PT-53 (2019-07-17 06:41:58+00:00): Hallo Arne,
Du hast diesen Kreisel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704943672/history neu eingezeichnet.
Ist das schon ein großer Kreisel oder eher ein Mini-Kreisel, den man in der Mitte überfahren kann?
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Verwechslungsgefahr
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-17 06:44:23+00:00): Der Kreisel war ja seit 07.2016 als Mini-Kreisel eingetragen.
PT-53 (2019-07-21 06:15:30+00:00): Hallo Arne,
baust Du den Kreisel noch zurück?
Fragende Grüße
Arne Schwarck (2019-07-21 06:23:38+00:00): Mini-kreisel ist schon richtig. Bin gerade am Kampen. Kann es erst nächste Woche machen.
PT-53 (2019-07-21 06:44:50+00:00): In Ordnung.
Arne Schwarck (2019-07-24 14:55:25+00:00): PT-53, Hier ist jetzt meine Logic für mini_roundabout
https://github.com/arne182/openpilot/commit/dec7abe666c7b7fd75f867dc1bbed2f4ec2d4eb9#diff-5a2a9f25ff0caf49e1967a3e70ec9fb5
PT-53 (2019-07-24 15:14:18+00:00): Hallo Arne,
was soll ich damit bzw. für was ist das gut?
Ich bin kein Programmierer.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-26 05:51:57+00:00): Hallo Arne,
für den Minikreisel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2917896692/history wird in keep right jetzt ein Hinweis "falscher Drehsinn, Node 2917896692" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=112823243
direction=clockwise wird nur in Ländern mit Linksverkehr benötigt. In Deutschland mit Rechtsverkehr ist das falsch.
Löscht Du dieses Merkmal wieder?
Fragende Grüße
Arne Schwarck (2019-07-26 09:44:55+00:00): Habe es korrigiert
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72677750
annieonthetrails (2019-07-16 18:44:16+00:00): Ignore name of this changeset - it doesn't relate to this set of changes, but I cannot modify it now.
annieonthetrails (2019-07-16 18:45:06+00:00): Ignore name of this changeset. It doesn't relate to this set of changes.
Dimacn (2019-07-22 17:42:59+00:00): Ваш парк удалён. Пожалуйста не добавляйте на карту несуществующих объектов. И не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park
Karthoo (2019-07-16 19:38:39+00:00): Hello, why did you create such an unecessary huge multipolygon? The ways the wood was mapped before was correct and in my eyes even better.
Meinew (2019-07-21 09:49:36+00:00): Hello, indeed the covered area is supposed to be unchanged. 

What I didn't like with the previous mapping was the fact you had many lines drawn that have no physical meaning. It create unnecessary noise to map features under these lines. For example some rivers were difficult to see with these lines. I tried to create large areas which have river as boundaries.

However I am interested to know what you think was better in the previous model. If needed I can split the big area into smaller one, I just want to know why I should do so.
Karthoo (2019-07-21 15:59:19+00:00): The problem about such large multipolygons is that they have a lot of members and they can get broken very easily. Another problem is that if someone downloads an area inside the polygon he may not notice that there is already a wood and maybe he adds another one inside it and it could be hard to add new areas as inner members of the relation. With 10x10 km areas that wouldn't happen necessarily because the chance to download the polygons is higher.
Meinew (2019-07-21 17:09:33+00:00): Ok.
Just ntice that if someone modify the map, it is probably because a feature is mising on the rendered map. And on this map he/she will see the wood, so there will be no reason to add a new one.
Anyway I agree that the pultipolygon becomes quite complex : I will split this area into smaller ones (following physical features).
MKnight (2019-07-21 17:46:57+00:00): If i found somewhere there a new quarry or some other interesting area and want to add as inner i have to search up to 80 kilometers to found the outer. 
So, the point at this time:
- you have deleted my work
- i have to spent more time than before to improve the map

for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/3.77107/-53.06680 there is a bare rock. To add this as inner: how can i find the monsterrelation for this?
Meinew (2019-07-21 18:04:29+00:00): Sorry for your work, I am currenty splitting back the multipolygons. My goal was not to create to big areas but to remove most of the artificial lines that have no physical meaning.
mariotomo (2021-10-08 14:35:25+00:00): Hola y buenos días. ojalá tenga más información, para completar según el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dmarina.
entre otras cosas,en la zona veo dos 'slipway', uno sin mapear, otro etiquetado erroneamente, hace 12 años.
será que tiene tiempo e interés en completar el puerto?
raito (2019-07-18 02:20:34+00:00): Hi Minh Nguyen. Its name signage in Jawi is bigger, but so are a lot other shops. Also, for this restaurant specifically (looking at old photos from Mapillary), its name in Jawi is almost same colour as the background and it does not stand out. I think for most businesses, the English name is the original name. If it is a Chinese business, the real name is the Chinese name in Latin or Chinese. All the other names on the signages are often direct translations or transliterations. Brunei is a rather nationalistic country, always trying to keep Malay and Jawi relevant. For sure almost nobody in Brunei look at the Jawi name.
Minh Nguyen (2019-07-19 00:51:25+00:00): Thank you for the clarification; I’ll keep that in mind in the future. Changeset 72410107 switches the main name to Phở Hòa, including the diacritical marks.
rskedgell (2025-07-16 09:54:56+00:00): Could you explain why you think that motor_vehicle=permissive applies to the A101 Rotherhithe Tunnel? As far as I can tell, it's a highway maintainable at public expense operated by TfL, which would be an implicit motor_vehicle=yes

Thanks.
mbethke (2019-07-18 04:21:41+00:00): Hi,
those POI types don't really match their names. It looks like they're shops so I changed them to shop=greengrocer for now, although the name suggests they might be some outdoor stalls better mapped as amenity-marketplace?

cheers,
Matthias
aleph_null (2021-01-17 13:44:34+00:00): Hey vpaul, wäre es OK für dich wenn ich die Baumreihen in der Poppelsdorfer Allee als einzelne Bäume mappe?
southglos (2019-07-16 23:37:31+00:00): Hi

Ta for the collection times updates, but note that 'lamp' refers to a type of postbox, not what it's mounted on: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:post%20box:type?uselang=en-GB#Values_in_use_in_United_Kingdom

I'll stick the lamp tag back.

Cheers
letsridebikes (2019-07-17 06:42:34+00:00): Ah, I was unfamiliar with the tag - I definitely should've double-checked that one. Thank you for the link and fixing it!
opendcc (2019-07-16 20:05:34+00:00): Hallo,

darf ich Dich nochmal bitten, Häuser korrekt einzuzeichnen und nicht mit der Hausnummer als Name zu taggen.
opendcc (2019-07-16 20:06:16+00:00): Was ist die Datenquelle der Edits?
opendcc (2019-07-17 16:41:02+00:00): Das Nametagging der Gebäude habe ich wieder entfernt. Bitte noch die Datenquelle angeben - und auch die Fehlermeldungen hinsichtlich doppelter Hausnummern/Straße bearbeiten, danke.
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-07-17 04:54:32+00:00): Ce înseamnă "TDN"?  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49039804)
Lola Fox (2019-08-19 13:38:13+00:00): Il percorso pedonale 612389008 da te modificato attraversa strada e ferrovia. Dalle immagini satellitari di Google Map non risulta nulla. Puoi valutare come correggere?
Lola Fox (2019-08-19 13:39:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/612389008#map=17/45.66793/13.76177
GBAB (2019-08-23 10:13:41+00:00): Cara Lola,
io ho solo cambiato la chiave di "notes" a "note" che fa (piu') senso quindi non conosco quella zona personale (anche se ci sono stato qualche volta).

Pero', se guardi Google streetview, vedi un cancellino:
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6682674,13.7615626,3a,60y,242.91h,77.05t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sL_XnWakojcbGXcjjYjJ_ww!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 e, sull'altra parte della ferrovia, un'entrata di galleria:
https://www.google.com/maps/@45.6680123,13.7609551,3a,37.5y,48.81h,85.6t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPyy2m3F7h3cyuhpuLTDCOQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Quindi, mi sembra che quel passaggio esista.
Lola Fox (2019-08-23 16:31:34+00:00): Stando a ciò che dici e a ciò che si vede, ammesso che il passaggio pedonale esista davvero (non è detto che cancellino e portone siano in collegamento), verrebbe da dire che è in tunnel, privato (se ciò non fosse non ci sarebbero porte e cancelli) e a giudicare dal portoncino in basso, anche in disuso.
eggie (2019-07-16 21:03:51+00:00): Dag ceejazz.

Het zou eigenlijk niet moeten uitmaken ...
Een hek houdt in OSM geen voetganger tegen behalve bij foot=no 
permissive wil zeggen dat de eigenaar van het terrein je ten alle tijde van het terrein kan verwijderen. In principe mag je er gewoon komen.
Het lijkt meer een probleem van "afstandmeten"
Ik zal je de welkomstmail voor nieuwe- en herstarterde mappers  toesturen per PB, want die heb je nog niet ontvangen zie ik.
MVG,
Eggie
naoliv (2019-08-15 02:23:21+00:00): Why are you adding landuse=grass in the parks, please?
osmviborg (2019-07-16 21:00:09+00:00): Road still under reconstruction.
Bulls_eye (2019-07-17 16:17:33+00:00): Hello osmviborg,

According to recent Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=YW0vO8PjMC5e5QituN7rPA&lat=55.357345026666664&lng=10.340186616666667&z=17) and DigitalGlobe imagery from July 10th, the road appears to be open? Do you happen to know when it will open? Thanks!
osmviborg (2019-07-17 18:15:11+00:00): I think you right. My ref. was this: https://www.odense.dk/borger/trafik-og-veje/veje/vejarbejde/assensvej-hvidkaervej-dyrupgaard-alle
Bulls_eye (2019-07-18 21:35:25+00:00): Sounds good, thank you for double checking. I realized there is a missing connection between Hvidkærvej and Dyrupgårds Allé. I’ll add that now. Mapillary seems to confirm turns are allowed in most directions but do you happen to have local knowledge to confirm?
osmviborg (2019-07-19 07:36:19+00:00): According to this announcement the road is open: https://www.odense.dk/borger/trafik-og-veje/tip-om-trafik/nyhedsmail-om-trafik-i-odense/2019/hvidkaervej-spaerret-den-13-14-og-17-juni
ke9tv (2019-08-25 21:13:17+00:00): I see the data source as 'Adirondack Atlas', which is a copyrighted source and therefore violates the policy of "don't copy from other maps without permission" (I searched the wiki and the Imports archive for discussion).
I replaced the data that appear to come from Adirondack Atlas with data from New York State DEC, which are open. I don't ordinarily import from that source because the data quality is highly variable, but I didn't want to let the copyright problem stand.
5m4u9 (2019-07-17 01:33:21+00:00): hi, be careful about mapping in valley of lapaz.
//
La Paz has steep streets, especially in the east, west and north of the city. Bing is the best satellite imagery because it corrects the slope of the streets, being the closest to the gps traces.
//
The other satellite images (esri, maxar) have displacements of the imagery with respect to the data... this makes that many users when changing the satellite imagery from bing to maxar (for example) move the drawn data. :(
//
A graphical way to see this situation, is to imagine that in the center of the city has an elevation of 3600m and at the top of the slopes 4000m...
//
I recommend using the bing imagery to improve the alignment of the streets and having everything mapped, change to the maxar image, adjust the displacement (each street is different displacement) and start updating the new changes there are in the city...
CapAhab (2019-07-17 15:59:48+00:00): Thank you for this information about displacement and imagery issues here.  I will be sure to check Bing imagery as the main source for La Paz.  La Paz is a very interesting city, I hope to visit someday :)
thatonedoge (2019-08-22 22:01:02+00:00): I noticed the name and remembered you from Slack. How'd you find this? Is this edit just changing Care_Credit to care_credit?
rivermont (2019-08-23 01:51:34+00:00): A while ago I went through  the `payments=` tag (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=payments) and was changing them all to the correct `payment:*=` tag so they could actually be used by consumers. (In hindsight it was probably on large enough scale that I should have announced it somewhere, but I almost cleared the tag from the database.)
And here I did only chang the value to lowercase in order to agree with all the common `payment:*` keys where even brands are expressed in lowercase.
abakus_uploader (2019-07-16 22:31:21+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Steve_32 (2019-07-18 18:46:09+00:00): Исправил)
Для здания с разной этажностью добавил дополнительные мультиполигоны. Ваша ошибка была в том, что части с ролью outer не должны соприкасаться гранями.
Проблема другого здания - адрес должен ставиться на полигон outline, а не на отношение building.
matsumi (2019-07-19 04:00:46+00:00): Спасибо
Hjart (2019-07-17 10:20:55+00:00): Bemærk at hvis du i stedet for Potlatch bruger iD vil du automatisk se de nyeste SDFE luftfotos hvor mange af stierne her er synlige.
Hans O Nymand (2019-07-17 14:38:51+00:00): Jeg har ikke noget imod ID, men det er ikke helt lykkedes mig at finde ud af hvordan man får sine GPS spor vist.
b-holdet (2023-06-30 05:05:32+00:00): Why are you correcting highway=path to highway=footway?

Footway is normally placed in urban areas as these are dedicated for pedestrian:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway

Path is normally for generic paths in nature:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path
b-holdet (2023-06-30 05:10:24+00:00): Sorry, asking in the wrong changeset
jonsger (2019-07-16 23:40:58+00:00): did you somehow accidentally remove the residential area of Pioneer?
muralito (2019-07-17 12:54:52+00:00): La meseta esta ubicada varios kilómetros al norte y ya esta mapeada.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-11-20 13:59:01+00:00): You created a lot of roads named "Ruta Libertadora", it doesnt exist in reality, please do not add it again. I deleted it
BCNorwich (2019-07-18 06:31:28+00:00): Hello,

Regarding the areas you added/amended. Please don't connect areas to the highway center lines. If you find such instances please take time to correct them. Farmland, woods and nature reserves do not usually extend across highways to the center line, that would make for most difficult driving. It is incorrect, makes for more difficult future amendments and is not what is on the ground.

In this instance the areas and highway had to be separated in order to see and correct the woods outline you had amended. You had inadvertently made a self intersection of the outline section that was connected to the highway.

Regards Bernard.
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2019-07-17 16:41:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. По Вашей просьбе правки были проверены. Всё внесено правильно и не требует корректировок.
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2019-07-17 16:41:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. По Вашей просьбе правки были проверены. Всё внесено правильно и не требует корректировок.
Felipe Alves (2019-07-16 22:55:30+00:00): Oi, Lexus. Tudo bem?
Conforme é informado na wiki, não se deve utilizar o nome todo maiúsculo, como fez no RENAL BAR. No caso da COLIM Coletas, imagino que Colim seja um nome tb, e não seja representado todo em maiúsculas.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:name
JoséAnt (2021-03-02 00:36:03+00:00): Porfavor podría dejar como estaba el nombre del Archipiélago tal y cómo estaba, ISLAS CANARIAS en grande y dejarlo el tamaño de la letra de todas las islas por igual, es discriminatorio ya que Las Palmas de Gran Cana6 es solo una isla más dentro del Archipiélago, muchas gracias
trigpoint (2019-07-17 11:51:29+00:00): Hi, what evidence have you that these are signed as A roads?
I am local and am they are certainly not signed as A roads and it is very obvious that these changes will cause some very stupid routing. 
In OSM we map what we see and this type of armchair edit is extremely unhelpful.
Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2019-07-17 14:51:30+00:00): Also why have you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350314926/history to a tunnel ?
urViator (2019-07-18 15:25:08+00:00): Re the Coleham Head "tunnel" -- I wasn't aware that I had! Whether it was previously wrong or an accidental change by me I don't know, but it's a bridge again now. Will answer your other points later (hopefully, this evening).
temporalista (2019-09-07 19:36:35+00:00): Hola Edwin y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap Ecuador.

muchas gracias por rus contribuciones en el mapa. Sin embargo te recomendamos no cambiar las etiquetas ya existentes sin consultar la documetación y acordar con la la comunidad . Por ejemplo, la circunvalación Sur de Cuenca es highway = trunk y tu la has cambiado a highway = motorway.

Las colaboraciones son siempre bienvenidas, pero hay que hacerlas con cuidado. Por ahora tendremos que revertir tus cambios debido a que han introducido problemas en el mapa.

Para cualquier duda, toda la comunidad estamos listos para ayudar.

Saludos

Daniel
user_5359 (2019-07-17 04:43:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. Please check the position of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5474041100. 
If you need help: You are welcome!