piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
_ANick_ (2017-01-11 20:20:26+00:00): Откуда такой адрес дома? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4515757367
Исправьте....
Владимир К (2016-11-28 07:22:44+00:00): Довольно бесполезное занятие. разницы практически никакой. К тому же, вы потеряли теги при переносе.
TsymbalAV (2016-11-29 18:10:03+00:00): Мой коммент тот же - здание с одним объектом должно быть этим объектом.
Владимир К (2016-11-29 18:34:52+00:00): Ну если вам это принципиально, то делайте. Главное делайте как нужно. Не теряйте теги при переносе, не оставляйте точку, тогда будет дублирование объекта. Таки скажу еще раз - практически бесполезное занятие, проще не трогать :)
TsymbalAV (2016-11-30 03:45:23+00:00): Я - за простоту. Коль это на любителя, то пусть так и остаётся. Я тоже свои первые объекты рисовал с точкой. Потом узнал про это правило, стал делать согласно нему. Теперь понятно.
DavidKewley (2016-11-23 00:59:13+00:00): How did you conclude it was misplaced? I live nearby and could check if desired.
user_5359 (2016-11-23 08:18:31+00:00): Please check the discussion of the original changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43031560 . The creator didn't answered the question as to how he produced the data.

If you visit the building or neighborhood
and add the collected data to OSM, it will be fine.

The procedure has been discussed with the DWG.
DavidKewley (2016-11-23 08:36:54+00:00): Ah, OK. I misunderstood "misplaced" to mean "known to be placed in an incorrect location", but I now understand you meant something else.
Tyanna Eaton (2016-11-28 17:17:04+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG Ground Survey 2016.
Starrkdave (2017-01-06 10:45:25+00:00): Hello. I can see you have added a lot of viewpoints with the designation IP...
I can not understand what is the use of this information, and the places where you added them are not touristic places. Can you explain the need for them?
lucadelu (2016-11-23 07:49:39+00:00): Ciao Raffaele, il nome che hai inserito non va bene, il tag name deve rappresentare il nome ufficiale dell'oggetto, da quello che ho capito Castello degli Antichi. Torre Quadrata lo puoi mettere in un ulteriore tag alt_name
Tyanna Eaton (2016-11-28 17:16:49+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG Ground Survey 2016.
literan (2016-11-22 21:50:38+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы сделали несколько ошибок. 1) шлагбаум всегда должен быть частью дороги (проезда), а не просто рядом стоять; 2) дороги не должны пересекать дома; 3) дома прямоугольной формы не следует превращать в кривые. Я все поправил, пожалуйста, будьте внимательнее/аккуратнее. Спасибо за правки!
user_5359 (2016-11-23 08:29:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the property https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323277613 . If the name of the scholl is changed, you must changed the school property.

If you need help: You are welcome!
literan (2016-11-23 12:15:46+00:00): теги здания здесь лишние (или man_made или building - сооружения или здания). Название тоже - туда пишутся только уникальные названия. Поправил.
AleksMapper (2016-11-23 12:21:03+00:00): Понял. Хотел посмотреть правки, но в веб-редакторе без изменений.
literan (2016-11-23 13:21:13+00:00): man_made=tower, увы, на http://www.openstreetmap.org не отображается пока.
naoliv (2016-11-24 13:20:21+00:00): Junior, o que você quis fazer aqui?
Obteve esses dados de onde?
smaprs (2016-11-24 13:47:47+00:00): Você duplicou trechos da Transamazônica, fundiu tags anteriores existentes, os nomes estão escritos errado (Rodovia TransamazÃ´nica), duplicou os limites da relação de distrito (veja aqui em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455149127 e o anterior https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422119611.  
  
Com que software fez isto?  
  
Por favor, entre em contato logo para verificar estes problemas.
Junior_Prado (2016-11-24 14:39:40+00:00): Olá!

Utilizei o software Qgis 2.8.3 pra vetorizar e o Josm (#11223) pra submeter. Os dados utilizados foi do Bing Rod.
Talvez a codificação dos caracteres da tabela não estavam em UTF8, como o recomendado pelo OpenStreetMap.
Se preferirem, podem voltar como estava antes. Peço desculpas pelo transtorno. 

Desde já agradeço a compreensão.

Obrigado,

Junior
user_5359 (2016-11-23 08:32:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.

Should I delete this additional node?
dgitto (2019-04-17 13:27:03+00:00): Hi. If you remove the tag "tourism=hotel" there is no way to understand if the object is a hotel/ a museum/ a stadium/ etc
jeka p (2017-02-26 11:39:39+00:00): hallo!
diese Straße existiert nicht mehr - Bahnhof Wolfurt wurde umgebaut und diese Straße existiert nicht mehr.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426809845/history#map=17/47.46219/9.73110

Ich habe die Straße vor 8 Monaten gelöscht.

LG,
Jeka
Smiljan_02 (2017-03-10 19:16:11+00:00): Hallo Jeka,

in deinem Änderungssatzkommentar stand leider nur etwas über Umbau, hatte deshalb vermutet, dass die Straße fehlt.
Danke für deine Korrektur.

Senni
user_5359 (2016-11-23 08:50:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! I move your entry from the building to the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4516653627, because I think you are a part of the hotel building. But the main question is: Is you name really „Scu,pting Spa“ (with comma) or "Scupting Spa“ (without comma)?

If you need help: You are welcome!
mueschel (2016-11-26 20:00:36+00:00): Hi,
kannst du das Tagging hier überprüfen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3594486008?

"xy" - soll vielleicht fire_hydrant:diameter heißen?
Gruß, Jan
user_5359 (2016-11-23 09:02:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25589604 ? Your entry is a duplicate information. I have deleted you entry.
marczoutendijk (2016-11-22 21:12:44+00:00): Vanaf deze changeset heb ik alles gerevert en teruggewerkt t/m changeset 43871873.
BeKri (2016-11-24 17:35:26+00:00): Tach Toni,
Du hast bei der Hansastraße Gartenbauamt die Hausnummer von 53 -> 59 gesetzt.
Gibt es einen Hinweis, dass das früher mal 53 war ? Soll früher wohl mal so gewesen sein.
Gruss vom BeKri
ToniE (2016-11-25 08:27:23+00:00): Servus BeKri,

ja, das stimmt, war mal 53, ist nun 59. Busparkplatz hat nun 55.
Ich war durch Diskrepanzen bei Suchergebnissen mit "G" und OSM-Daten aufmerksam geworden und hatte das vor Ort mal gechecked. Am Eingang des Bauhofs sind zwei Schilder: "53" mit rotem Balken durchgestrichen, "59" daneben. Auf dem Busparkplatz ist ein (ehemaliges, nun leeres) Flüchtlingscamp, das die (neue) Nummer "55" hat. Das Camp (die Gebäude) werde ich noch einzeichnen.

N.B.: Ich hoffe in 2 Wochen zum Stammtisch kommen zu können. Ich arbeite nun ganz in der Nähe und habe vermutlich Zeit nach der Arbeit mal rüber zu laufen.

Viele Grüße
Toni
skyper (2016-11-26 16:02:12+00:00): Sorry wrong changeset comment and source

source=survey; Maps4BW; Mapbox imagery

comment: adss and fixes after survey
muralito (2016-11-23 03:35:44+00:00): Por favor, no muevan estaciones de servicio de nodo a vias. Estqan chequeadas todas las del pais desde hace unas semanas, y si las mueven a via el conflate funciona mal.
Ranger444 (2016-12-06 17:56:10+00:00): I have stopped the practice of combining nodes and roofs at your request.
muralito (2016-12-06 18:16:28+00:00): Thanks.
GinaroZ (2016-11-30 00:22:05+00:00): Hi, I noticed http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/431032789 is tagged as shop=off_licence. If this is just a shop selling alcohol it should really be tagged with shop=alcohol instead :)
skyper (2016-12-07 14:52:09+00:00): Die Apotheke sollte doch nicht mitten auf der Kreuzung landen oder ?
skyper (2016-12-14 15:57:47+00:00): Habe ich gelöscht. Bitte kontaktieren wenn richtiger Ort bekannt.
trigpoint (2016-11-27 19:08:21+00:00): Please do not add personal markers to OSM. I have reverted this
Jo89195 (2016-11-22 23:09:41+00:00): I added the solar microgrid at the same time too. Now we have duplicates. In my opinon the boundary should be closer to the riverbed on the west and not include the hut visible on the sattelite image in the east.
I used this source:
http://www.americansamoa.gov/aspa-solar
cronoser (2016-11-24 00:20:06+00:00): Hello. It's funny to see it: the changeset are very similar 43882451 (mine) vs 43883047 (yours) :-)
I fixed it, I see that your area is better with the boundary, I used tags of both area and now there is only one area. I used this source http://blog.solarcity.com/island-in-the-sun/
muralito (2016-12-06 03:36:45+00:00): DO NOT DRAW ROUNDED STREETS WHERE THEY ARENT NONE!!!!!
Ranger444 (2016-12-06 15:19:48+00:00): I will look into that, could you please give me the feature URL so that I know which street you're talking about?
muralito (2016-12-07 15:16:38+00:00): Im talking about the intersection of La Cumparsita and Doctor Carlos Maria Morales.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43882892#map=19/-34.91417/-56.18046
Ranger444 (2016-12-07 15:32:12+00:00): By rounded streets, do you mean roundabouts?
muralito (2016-11-23 03:24:18+00:00): "Abitab" es amenity=payment_centre
muralito (2016-11-23 03:17:34+00:00): Abitab y RedPagos no es bank
Es amenity=payment_centre
muralito (2016-11-23 03:19:15+00:00): "Financia HSBC" is not a name.
"Financia HSBC" like "HSBC lends you the money"
muralito (2016-11-23 03:19:43+00:00): La Cigale > amenity=ice_cream
Ranger444 (2016-12-06 17:55:02+00:00): I am now tagging Abitab and RedPagos as amenity=payment_centre. 

What would be the proper tag for "Financia HSBC"?
muralito (2016-12-07 01:41:09+00:00): Also, just to clarify, some Abitab and RedPagos do have money exchange service, but to know for sure you have to enter and ask. Having an exchange rates table in the window is also indicator that they probably do exchange money.

Is seems that in those cases is better to add a another node with amenity=bureau_de_change
muralito (2016-12-07 13:58:37+00:00): I dont know without seeing it, most probably is just a new building that advertises some apartaments for sale. You can also see as "Financia Santander" or any other bank.

I will go there next week.
Ranger444 (2016-12-07 15:29:30+00:00): Abitab and RedPagos then are either amenity=bureau_de_change
OR
amenity=payment_centre
Correct??
muralito (2016-12-07 17:01:48+00:00): Not exactly. They are always amenity=payment_centre (their main business activity), and also sometimes are amenity=bureau_de_change, so because multivalued amenity is not well interpreted by all consumers is better to be mapped as two separate elements.
muralito (2016-11-23 03:22:26+00:00): "Dios es Amor" es amenity=place_of_whorship
muralito (2016-11-23 03:23:15+00:00): "Farmacia Niza" va sin "Farmacia",  con el amenity=pharmacy es suficiente.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-23 01:34:46+00:00): You've got the link on at least Nottingham wrong here.  The city is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q41262?uselang=en-GB, the admin area is https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21885994 .  http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/123292 should link ot the latter, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24913081 the former.
Other links in here may have similar issues.
nyuriks (2016-11-23 04:55:19+00:00): Thanks, fixed. I will review all admin levels vs wikidata very soon - there is a lot more cleanup work to do, esp because there are some WD entries that represent multiple things.
Robert Whittaker (2017-01-09 23:04:55+00:00): Are you sure about the postcode on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4516185304 ? According to Code-Point Open, "BS16 7JR" is located about 1.5km away and is assigned to houses on Johnson Road.
Adam Harrison (2017-01-09 23:25:56+00:00): You are correct. A typo on my part. Should be BS16 7JW
user_5359 (2016-11-23 09:12:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A gate is a point on the highway. Please add the point, where the gate will be installed. And your used name is a description not a name.

If you need help: You are welcome.
muralito (2016-11-23 03:10:24+00:00): Tabare-Sendic son el presidente y el vicepresidente uruguayos. Al reconocimento cartografico le esta faltando contexto local.
brettmalott (2016-11-23 18:37:31+00:00): Sorry I live in the U.S. and we are just working off of car footage that we have captured.
muralito (2016-11-23 18:46:12+00:00): No problem.

¿Where is the footage available?
¿Where can I contact your group?

I have some tips to improve the maps and avoid some mistakes most of you are maiking.
muralito (2016-11-23 18:48:21+00:00): Some mistakes are probably made by lack of local knowledge, and with small tips you can make better quality changesets.
aharvey (2016-11-23 04:18:01+00:00): Hi there, club and sport a different tags, I've fixed this up see http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4395466707/history
muralito (2016-12-02 23:11:10+00:00): INE * are not street names. Are names used internally by www.ine.gub.uy in their maps-
SomeoneElse (2016-12-10 11:00:58+00:00): Should the "Ine" names be moved from "name" to "ref", or are they something else?
muralito (2016-12-11 13:26:45+00:00): Not automated, because some "ine" streets are names adopted by the neighbours. To add or remove a "ine" name a detailed survey is needed (probably talking with people living there), or if KG actually surveyed street signs with that name that's ok.
BharataHS (2016-11-23 04:18:19+00:00): Hey Howpper,
Your efforts on adding data on to OSM is deeply appreciated. Could you please let the community know, the reason behind deleting a lake which is visible in Bing satellite imagery.  Thank you.
Carnildo (2016-11-23 04:33:09+00:00): Not just satellite imagery.  I've got a half-dozen photographs of it at various times this year.
muralito (2016-11-23 00:58:31+00:00): Hola.
"Sapolio" es una marca de insecticidas. Dudo mucho que sea el nombre de una tienda.

"Mercado de Carnes" probablemente seria shop=butcher porque por el nombre esa seria su actividad principal.
brettmalott (2016-11-23 18:39:56+00:00): Again I am not aware of everything, because I am just working from footage, but any assistance you offer in correcting any mistakes or mis tags would be appreciated.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-20 22:59:08+00:00): Is "Rillington Place 10" really a tourist attraction, and is it here?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4516194593
shawmat (2016-12-21 19:15:04+00:00): 10 Rillington Place was the house where John Christie murdered several women in the 1950s. What made it even more notorious was that a lodger at the house, Timothy Evans, was convicted of the murder of his wife and was executed. But it had been Christie that did it.  More than any other case, the wrongful execution of Evans brought to an end capital punishment in the UK. 
Now, is it here? Yes. The original street was demolished and the name changed.  A movie was made starring Richard Attenborough at the actual house just before demolition, so do try to see the film. The whole area was blighted by construction of the A40M Westway as well as the Christie murders so destruction was the only option, and there is now very little to see apart from ex-local authority housing.
Paul Berry (2017-01-23 15:47:02+00:00): There is no trace whatsoever left of Rillington Place or any of the properties that lined it. So although this might be the geographical point at which the infamous house, wash-house and gardens stood, nothing physical remains at all (quite deliberately). When the area was redeveloped in the 1970s into Bartle Road no building was planned to occupy the spot where No. 10 stood. There is now a small, private, gated-off, communal garden in the place, with no identifying marks, signs, or similar (again, by design).

So, you should change this to "Site of 10 Rillington Place", if not remove it.
Supaplex (2016-11-23 06:05:58+00:00): 愛台玩，請不要把一片住宅區有幾棟房子的狀況全標成建築，並不符合現地的狀況
Andreas Binder (2016-12-17 19:19:21+00:00): Hi lizbjanson 

you created three bridges (see http://up.picr.de/27742169fk.jpg) in your seven changesets #44043969, #43969140, #43969115, #43884707, #43871759, #43858328, #43858320. 
You wrote as changesettitles "there is a bridge here", but none of the bridges exists in the real world! I will remove the brigdes now.

1 is a ford (see http://up.picr.de/27740431tq.jpg).
2 is a common track (see http://up.picr.de/27740423vk.jpg)
3 is a ford (see http://up.picr.de/27740439xp.jpg)

Why do you made this none existing bridges? Openstreetmap is not an testsystem! Please do not make such edits again. Feel free to contact me if something is unclear.

Regards,
Andreas
Supaplex (2016-11-23 06:30:10+00:00): 已經locality處理，不必在name欄位修改
SomeoneElse (2016-11-23 15:07:18+00:00): Hi,
I've noticed that https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q203889 has a property "OpenStreetMap Relation ID=158392".
Is that (a) a good idea, given that OSM IDs may change and (b) ODBL compliant (see http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright)?  
Obviously this isn't directly related to the change you've made here, but I thought that you might know the answer.
Incidentally, Luton doesn't seem to have the same problem as Nottingham in wikidata in that the wikidata entry is for both the "town" and the "admin area".
nyuriks (2016-11-23 17:20:10+00:00): LOL :)  https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Properties_for_deletion#OpenStreetMap_Relation_identifier_.28P402.29 - i repeatedly said that property should be deleted, but some insist that it is needed because it is hard to do database joins (causing data duplication and ambiguity and mistakes instead) :(
nyuriks (2016-11-23 21:00:39+00:00): Btw, please comment there with your opinion. I am not personally too sure the legal argument has merit (referencing something by its ID vs copying a significant portion of the database - I suspect only later has the database legal protection in some jurisdictions, but IANAL), but the stability argument has been made repeatedly by many people. Plus having two way links are bound to create data consistency issues.
nyuriks (2016-11-24 00:59:09+00:00): My colleague helped me with this nice query - gets all of the admin/sub-admin/sub-sub... regions for any country.  We could add some other fun things like geo coordinates for validation, or just compare with the names.  https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Yurik/Admin_regions
user_5359 (2016-11-23 09:17:45+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! To make a distinction between the names of the building and the business, it will be a good idea to add the business as point. For better description of the business, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage .

If you need help: You are welcome!
Simple Clinical Massage Therapy (2016-11-23 19:35:22+00:00): I hope I made the correct changes. Thank you for your help!
user_5359 (2016-11-23 19:45:48+00:00): I have made some minor changes (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4517759767 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368433809)
mikelmaron (2016-12-08 19:54:00+00:00): @woodpeck_repair was there any public discussion of reverting this import? I agree that imports should have discussion -- but also think reverts should have discussion too, and a chance for things to be made right.
woodpeck (2016-12-08 20:35:54+00:00): We don't publicly discuss reverting imports but we usually seek to get in touch with the importers (in this case, three unsuccessful attempts have been made by various people in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37015792 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36896136 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36853029). Allowing undiscussed and undocumented imports to remain would lead to a situation where everyone would just import their stuff because there's a good chance of it being approved post-hoc. This is undesirable; we must educate users to adhere to the few rules that we have, and that includes that rogue imports are subject to removal.
mikelmaron (2016-12-09 15:34:18+00:00): Thanks for the reply @woodpeck. I definitely agree we need documented imports, but I'm unclear about the proactive import process, and I'm far from the only one in the community confused by it. A few questions to help get a better picture.

* How are undocumented imports discovered? Are they reported to the DWG? Or is the DWG actively looking for these? 

* Once a undocumented import is found, what is the process for communicating with the importer to resolve the problem? What else is done in the process of investigating the import? What is the amount of time given for response from the user? If they are responsive, what is the amount of time given for fixing or documenting properly?

* If the goal is to educate users, what is the reasoning for no public discussion of import reverts? Or even logging and statistics on reverts? Transparency, allowing mappers to know more about what reverts are happening and why, would help greatly to inform the community about the accepted procedure for imports.

Thanks
Mikel

ps How do you personally have so much time to do reverts? :) @woodpeck_repair seems to work day after day on these!
mikelmaron (2016-12-09 15:34:55+00:00): s/proactive import process/proactive import revert process/
user_5359 (2016-11-23 09:06:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
user_5359 (2016-11-23 09:19:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short remark: The name "Street Intersection with Towhee Drive" isn't necessary.
Whereis_Cruicky (2016-11-23 04:17:08+00:00): I actually meant "I've extended The Circuit to have access from Branwhite Street"
Carnildo (2016-11-23 08:54:23+00:00): Are you sure Crestline between 11th and 15th doesn't exist?  Aerial imagery certainly shows something street-like.
PlaneMad (2017-05-21 15:07:48+00:00): Jem, many thanks for all your contribution. It seems like you use the primary tag for all the roads which is incorrect. Primary roads are the major roads connecting cities and towns at the level next to a national highway. Making fixes to many of these roads.
woodpeck (2016-11-28 01:20:54+00:00): This changeset appears to create about 24,000 buildings in one go. Are you sure that you have traced these from aerial imagery, as the source tag implies? The footprint of this building for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455207307 is hardly decipherable from either Bing or USGS...
DavidKewley (2016-11-28 02:08:52+00:00): As a technical note less important than the question of the source(s): The building footprint that woodpeck cited was added in this changeset as two separate but identical ways, it appears.
user_870861 (2016-11-30 10:02:45+00:00): hi, 
there is some mistake with this your changeset :
duplicated tags and geometry 
- inside changeset 43886022 
- between this changesets : 43962925 vs 43960307 ; 43965236 vs 43960307 ; 43965236 vs 43962925
issues can be see at
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?item=0&country=usa_north_carolina
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
user_5359 (2016-11-23 09:22:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the name of the business: macy's techlonogy or macy's technology ?
mavl (2016-11-23 17:29:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы снова добавляете водопады в центре города. Пожалуйста, будьте внимательнее.  
Чтобы ответить на это сообщение, вам нужно перейти по ссылке на сайт OpenStreetMap. Затем войти под своей учётной записью и написать комментарий на сайте в пустое поле в разделе "Обсуждение".
Murcik (2016-11-24 20:39:17+00:00): Очень мило, когда там оказывается меня было забанили, а я и не в курсе. 
На почту такие интересные вещи отчего-то и не приходят.
mavl (2016-11-25 06:48:41+00:00): Да, К сожалению, при блокировке уведомление не отправляется.
Murcik (2016-11-25 07:14:56+00:00): Но ведь блокирующий всегда может ручками сдублировать сообщение в личку.
Мапсми не дает нотификаций, что пользователь блокирован.
Даже на почту-то зашел случайно и увидел комментарии к правкам, зашел ответить, увидел блокировку.
Хорошо, что вроде больше в мапсми ничего не правил, а то бы но то пропало бы, не то после разблокировки пачкой бы вывалило водопадов.
mavl (2016-11-25 07:20:59+00:00): Конечно, он может (и иногда так делает). Но у него нет обязанности перед блокировкой отправлять ещё и личное сообщение.
Murcik (2016-11-25 08:16:58+00:00): В этом и беда. Обязанностей нет. Нигде не описаны. Поэтому технические недостатки системы невозможно компенсировать организационными мерами.