piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sanjorgepinho (2020-01-20 09:13:19+00:00): Obrigado pela resposta topolusitania. No entanto, continua sem me informar qual a fonte de dados que se baseou para afirmar de que "Quinta do Lopes" é uma Aldeia ou Lugar. Pode-me informar como chegou à conclusão que "Quinta do Lopes" é uma Aldeia ou Lugar? Obrigado.
topolusitania (2020-01-20 12:56:44+00:00): Olá
Não estou a perceber nem a pergunta nem a insistência. Eu não afirmo que a Quinta do Lopes é uma aldeia ou lugar. Eu digo, por lá ter estado, e por lá ter mapeado em 2018 alguns moinhos, que a zona pode ser classificada como hamlet. E como hamlet essa zona ou parte tem o nome de Quinta do Lopes.
Sugiro que consultes a wiki OSM para a definição de hamlet e não te atenhas à tradução. Se queres ser construtivo, sugere. Não sejas inquisitivo, sem trazer nada de novo.
sanjorgepinho (2020-01-20 15:05:01+00:00): Olá topolusitania, 
Em primeiro lugar informo-te que sou de Setúbal e moro próximo.
Em vez de simplesmente reverter a tua edição, porque não a entendi, quis saber a razão dela. Poderias ter uma razão válida. Por exemplo a Quinta do Lopes poderia estar classificada como "Lugar" no Instituto Nacional de Estatística, ter uma placa identificativa deste pertenço "lugar", estar classificada no PDM ou outro razão plausível.
Lendo a definição de "Tag:place=hamlet" em "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=hamlet" e conhecendo esta zona não encontro justificação.
Dei por esta alteração quando ia editar a Bolacha Piedade na Avenida Luisa Todi. Na busca, o que me apareceu foi "Bolacha Piedade, 502, Avenida Luísa Todi, Troino, Quinta do Lopes, Nossa Senhora da Anunciada, Setúbal, Península de Setúbal, Área Metropolitana de Lisboa, 2900-456, Portugal". Se verificares, com esta edição foste "afetar" uma zona muito maior e por isso esta edição necessita ser revertida."
topolusitania (2020-01-20 22:56:44+00:00): Olá. Se tivesses feito a pergunta correctamente e a sua razão, ter-te-ia respondido logo que o topónimo "Quinta do Lopes", para além de me ter sido indicado na altura e eu o ter marcado como waypoint, foi confirmado na carta 1:25000 Folha 454 Edição 5 - 2009.  
A minha edição de 2018 foi seguida, uma semana depois, por edições tuas na mesma zona, Já lá estava a Quinta do Lopes tal como está e na altura nada disseste. 18 meses depois vens perguntar qual o critério para eu classificar um dado local de Aldeia ou Lugar ? Para algo ou alguma coisa estar mapeado no OSM não precisa de atestado de legalidade. Basta que exista. O principio é mapear o que está, ou o que se constata.
Como residente na zona, talvez não vejas a mesma com o olhar analitico de quem lá passa para mapear. A zona obviamente tem um nome. Poderá "Quinta do Lopes" ter caído em desuso ? Talvez, mas está nas cartas 1:25000. Na tua opinião como classificas esse aglomerado de casas? E que nome tem ? Ou melhor, como é que os que lá vivem lhe chamam ?  Moinho do Forte ? Quinta dos Moinhos de São Filipe ? Quinta do Patricio ? São Francisco ? A mim disseram-me "Quinta do Lopes", e a folha 454 confirmou...
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:43:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
Marych_ (2018-05-10 04:57:57+00:00): отмечена как гостиница
укажите контактные телефоны еще
Wulfmorn (2018-11-17 01:01:40+00:00): This node is a bit strange. Is it supposed to be that way?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5607484650
tom_konda (2018-11-24 11:59:43+00:00): Thank you for your reviewing.
This node is incorrect by my copy and paste mistake on iD editor.
I will remove this node soon.
user_177389 (2018-05-10 05:08:55+00:00): Hello,
please read the documentation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members - especially the column "Occurrence".
Best regards
penom (2019-01-02 00:53:48+00:00): Gerekli düzeltmeleri ekliyorum. İlginiz için teşekkür ederim.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-09-21 16:04:39+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1535685 ?
user_5359 (2018-05-09 17:37:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t delete private ways, if the exists. You can mark them with access=private (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) .
demon_box (2018-05-10 09:05:59+00:00): ciao Corrado, ti ho mandato 2 messaggi su OSM, perchè non rispondi??
grazie
PT-53 (2018-05-10 04:27:04+00:00): Hallo SLMapper,
Willkommen bei OSM.
.
Toiletten haben keinen Eigennamen. Ich habe name=Toilette daher wieder gelöscht.
Bitte verwende Name nur für echte Eigennamen (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name).
Danke
.
Grüße
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
Velocimaptor (2018-09-27 20:19:04+00:00): Are you able to verify that there is indeed a building being built here? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488969901

Our imagery is very fresh and still just shows a parking lot there. If you wouldn't mind looking into it and letting me know  I'll draw in or leave out the parking aisles accordingly.

Thank you for your help!
chachafish (2018-09-27 21:17:29+00:00): Howdy :) Yep, this is brand-new construction. Here are some photos for ya. Thanks for checking. You never know, I might make a mistake sometimes :)  https://denverinfill.com/blog/2018/08/modera-capitol-hill-update-3.html
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
trial (2018-05-13 11:54:58+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Because your two changes are far away, i would have been much better to send it in two sets. Here you've triggered the clean up of tiles on Four or five continents!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58825638
santamariense (2018-06-13 02:14:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586990033 > Você marcou como sendo um pomar. É realmente isso?
Sabe o nome desse: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586990034 ???
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58825847
seattlefyi (2018-05-09 18:05:47+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! I see you're doing some work with Field Papers -- that's great, but OSM is meant for mapping permanent features, not temporary attributes like you added in this changeset. Separate tools do exist which you can use to make an map which overlay pushpins at these locations, just please don't add this info to OSM.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
BCNorwich (2018-05-10 05:48:13+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
An area is always better than a single point, POI. The skating area was already mapped so I've placed your new data on that area along with the original area data. Thus all data concerning the feature is consolidated.
Regards Bernard
viloan (2018-05-09 17:54:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
Ilya Kogan (2021-07-12 03:12:50+00:00): Thank you! I have no idea why I marked them as "bridleway" - looks like a bug in the old editor I used to use...
Madeline Steele (2018-05-10 00:11:23+00:00): Hi! This changeset looks fine but the hashtags seem wrong and confusing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58827337
yeah3535 (2018-05-29 23:44:21+00:00): Why shouldn't this be a motorway?
Russ McD (2018-10-20 02:43:15+00:00): Way: 556071150 has been added correctly as a track, but no attempt has been made to connect this orphan road to the rest of the network, despite connections to the East being clearly visible.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
BCNorwich (2018-05-10 07:40:21+00:00): Hi, you inadvertently left the service roads on the car park no joined up. I've rectified this problem.
Regards Bernard
ndm (2018-05-09 22:47:13+00:00): Why spam?

The Bristol POI you deleted looked pretty reasonable.
user_5173844 (2018-05-09 23:50:28+00:00): Why not simply remove or edit description tags? There is nothing to suggest these POIs were wrong. Can you bring them back?
SuborbitalPigeon (2018-05-10 08:45:16+00:00): Feel free to revert if you want to, but you'll need to get rid of the advertising in the description tag and also add some other tags (like what the businesses actually are).

But these are clearly spam bots, so I'd rather not trust any data they come up with is accurate.
Alecs01 (2018-11-18 14:02:27+00:00): Already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/691332585
DaveF (2020-09-19 15:49:54+00:00): Hi
Do you know the class of this protect boundary?
smeòrach (2021-09-26 20:34:26+00:00): Hi (sorry I didn't respond before) it's a country park so primarily preserved for local and semi-local walking, recreational activities etc. maybe protect_class=7? it's not classed as a nature reserve. maybe protected area isn't even the right tag, I don't know.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 07:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 59424544, 59497814, 59441446, 59482132, 59496060, 59481028, 59500030, 59478895, 59459658, 59486507, 59498258, 59450799, 59490136, 59484155, 59476378, 59487760, 59491122, 59444022, 59462431, 59485214, 59473556, 59446879, 59445863, 59447827, 59470526, 59483151, 59477247, 59439057, 59456608, 59474301, 59489001, 59492137, 59453436, 59468097, 59472336, 59495282, 59474947, 59476785, 59500961, 59497376, 59430658, 59475985, 59477924, 59479943, 59434396, 59496953, 59494262, 59498741, 59496578, 59465543, 59499320, 59493196, 59449260, 59427304, 59475503 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
Anazaar (2018-07-12 20:33:57+00:00): Ze względu na FETOR omijam tą okolicę ale Czy aby na pewno użyto tu nawierzchnię typu "kocie łby" cobelstone?
dariuszdawidowski (2018-07-13 07:59:43+00:00): Taka klasyczna betonowa kostka brukowa jak w miastach. Dokładnie tylko na tym odcinku przy zakładach.
Anazaar (2018-07-13 09:24:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:surface

Polecał bym więc użyć surface=paving_stones

Pozdrawiam
dariuszdawidowski (2018-07-16 15:58:04+00:00): Zmienione. Pozdrawiam również
fukejs (2018-05-10 06:25:58+00:00): Great, thank you for making relation.
I just wanted to add info about UNESCO heritage to some entity and I hadn't found any proper one. So I had to create it.
Now, I've deleted the duplicite node I'd created yesterday.
Anazaar (2018-07-12 20:38:47+00:00): widzę, ze skorygowano po przebudowie lecz pozostawiono tracktype :-) co powinno zniknąć skoro droga już nie track :-) Pozdrawiam
user_5359 (2018-05-09 20:02:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A sign isn't a park. Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:board_type (following the links)
Pitabred (2018-05-09 20:25:00+00:00): I'll fix that, thanks!
viloan (2018-05-09 19:13:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
zors1843 (2018-05-09 20:12:32+00:00): Stokveldepad bestaat niet meer ?
Marc_ch (2018-05-15 10:59:16+00:00): Bonjour,
quel est la source de cet import et des autres et où ceux-ci ont-il été discutés ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Import/Guidelines
Salutations,
Marc
Lokai (2018-05-10 04:10:52+00:00): Hallo,

bei den meisten Wirtschaftswegen wird access=agricultue angegeben (leider oft falsch), meistens würde vehicle=agriculture passen. Steht dort Zeiche 260? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland - lange Warten!)
5m4u9 (2018-05-09 21:36:04+00:00): awesome! thanks for mapping this attraction or update tourism points...
geri-oc (2018-06-10 07:53:04+00:00): Ich finde Gehege mit Damwild, Rehe oder Lamas die der Fleischgewinnung dienen sollte eine Attraktion bleiben, aber kein ZOO's werden. Und das bitte nicht einfach aus der Ferne ändern, wenn man nicht die Örtlichkeit kennt.
Gruß Gerd
geow (2018-06-13 07:16:37+00:00): Wildgehege sind kein Zoos, sondern Freilandtierhaltung und können im Einzelfall auch mal eine Sehenswürdigkeit sein. Zoo wäre “mapping for rendering”.
dx125 (2018-06-13 12:35:00+00:00): Wie genau muss das korrekte tagging eines Wildgeheges aussehen?
Ich habe die von mir neu erfassten Wildgehege bisher als Zoo bezeichnet, da im Wiki in der Rubrik Zoo leider auch das Wildgehege beschrieben ist. 
Da sollte man vielleicht auch mal das Wiki anpassen?
Gardke (2018-07-13 11:18:16+00:00): Sorry für die Späte Antwort.
@geri-oc Woher weißt du das ich die Örtlichkeiten nicht kenne?
@dx125 Ja ich denke auch, dass sollte wirklich eindeutiger in der Wiki beschrieben werden. Ich musste auch erst in einigen Quellen recherchieren.
geri-oc (2018-07-13 12:17:24+00:00): Warum dann die Änderung, wenn man vor Ort sieht, das es ein Haltung von Damwild zur Fleischcherzeugung (Göbel) ist. Von Touristen und Kindergarten /Schulen als Ausflugspunkt genutz.

@Gardke: weil ich auch Bäche und Wegkreuzungen im Tharander Wald gefunden habe, die sich überschneiden. oder Naturschutzgrenzen die durch Gebäude gehen (Windberg) vermute ich die Nutzung von Webatlas. Naturschutz gebiet Windberg ist z.B. am Waldrand ausgeschildert. Wir sollten das erfassen, was vor Ort ist und WMS nur als Hilfsmittel nutzen - meine Meinung.
Gruß Gerd aus Freital ehemals Schmiedeberg.
user_5359 (2018-06-25 11:23:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! I have reverted you changeset because your values are visible wrong.
kapazao (2018-05-10 21:24:14+00:00): Buenas noches,
he visto que en una de tus modificaciones se te ha ido un poco la mano y la has liado moviendo una calle (Calle Padre Alcover), a ver si pudieras corregirlo.
Gracias por tus aportes, un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58831521
eggie (2018-05-10 06:53:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-05-10 06:57:03+00:00): Je hebt hier de notatie van de postcode veranderd en het huisnummer. Waarom?
De adressen komen echter direct van het Kadaster.
eggie (2018-05-10 07:03:44+00:00): Liever geen adresnodes veranderen, maar gewoon direct de juiste uitkiezen.
De adresnodes heb ik weer hersteld. Deze liggen verborgen onder elkaar.
mbeskers (2018-05-10 07:18:37+00:00): Per ongeluk de verkeerde “verdiepingtoevoeging” gebruikt. Vandaar de aanpassing. 
Maar dank voor de feedback.
eggie (2018-05-10 07:41:51+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor je reactie.. De info staat nu op de goede adresnode.
user_5359 (2018-05-10 04:34:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards.
Natalia Jara (2018-05-28 21:39:18+00:00): Peluquería Unisex Erika
PeterPan99 (2021-12-19 22:00:03+00:00): I  notice (as part of a MapRoulette Challenge) that in this edit you have left Way 587036831 as a line, but tagged as "leisure=nature reserve", which is normally an area.  I am reluctant to delete it from my armchair; can you resolve, please?
SK53 (2021-12-19 22:13:51+00:00): It can go, must have just got left accidentally when I had to chop up the original nature reserve polygon & reassemble on it's much smaller new boundaries.
PeterPan99 (2021-12-20 07:48:21+00:00): Many thanks.  I will delete it.
Alhamdulillah (2019-12-20 21:43:35+00:00): Hi Joseph,
is this the official zoning of Seiad Valley ?
Joseph E (2019-12-21 02:58:42+00:00): Some of the boundary lines (like the edges of the national forests) are based off of public domain USGS maps, but the vegetation and landuse are based off of Bing aerial imagery and my knowledge of the area from living nearby in the past. I did this over a year ago when I was a new user, so it might need improvement, if there is now better aerial imagery or Forest Service maps available.
_PG_ (2019-09-22 17:13:18+00:00): Уважаемый, прошу объяснить, почему вы используете для маппинга маршрутов своих велопрогулок тэг, который предназначен (смотрите внимательно OSM wiki) исключительно для обозначения официальных веломаршрутов, полностью промаркированных и адаптированных для безопасного движения велосипедистов?

К сожалению, карта OSM не предназначена для рисования воображаемых веломаршрутов.

В случае непредоставления вразумительного ответа буду вынужден удалить маршрут с карты и пожаловаться на вандализм.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%88%D1%80%D1%83%D1%82%D1%8B

P.S. К сожалению, в настоящее время мне неизвестен механизм, который бы позволил обозначать на карте удобные маршруты для велосипедистов. Но тэг "веломаршрут" для этой цели однозначно не годится. Пожалуйста, удалите его самостоятельно.
_PG_ (2019-09-22 17:17:23+00:00): Прошу прощения, видимо не вы автор этого маршрута, он случайно косвенно затронулся одной из ваших правок. Сейчас буду разбираться с историей его создания более подробно.