piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2019-01-11 23:30:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abrensch (2019-01-13 08:52:29+00:00): Hallo Silberdolch,

ich habe diesen Änderungssatz hier zurückgesetzt, weil da ein Loch im Anschluss B188/L289 enstanden ist.

Leider sind damit aber auch die Änderungen an den Gräben weg.

Sorry und Gruss, Arndt
mavl (2019-01-11 11:45:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет зеркало с названием "Лесная грунтовка." В рабочую группу по данным пришло сообщение, что никакого зеркала в этом месте нет.  
  
Что такое зеркало описано в статье  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=traffic%20mirror?uselang=en  
  
Пожалуйста, не добавляйте несуществующие объекты на карту.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
Serg Podarevsky (2019-01-11 12:20:45+00:00): Исправил на "road", грунтовая лесная дорога.
mavl (2019-01-24 06:31:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66591396 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2478].
mueschel (2019-01-14 19:35:20+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "apm" to several routes. What does it mean? It's not used in any other place.

Thanks
Jan
Juan C Balboa (2020-02-25 00:38:05+00:00): Sorry for the response in spanish, I'm not able to reliably talk in english.

Hola Jan.
Es un coeficiente que trata de medir objetivamente la dureza de un puerto, basado principalmente en su longitud y su pendiente. Fue creado originalmente por los usuarios de la web altimetrias.net (https://www.altimetrias.net/articulos/4cd.asp), y debido a su buen funcionamiento, se usa en bastantes páginas con cálculos de altimetrías ciclistas.
Todos los 640 puertos, y sus vertientes, incluidos en el CIMA (http://retocima.webcindario.com) llevan aparejado dicho coeficiente, el cual indico en la relación, aún no siendo un tag oficialmente reconocido. Si en el futuro se decide usar, ya está el trabajo hecho :-).
Un saludo.
mueschel (2020-02-25 09:00:37+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the reply! Language doesn't matter as long as we have automatic translation :-)
We already have the more general tag 'mtb:scale' and this seems to be similar, but more detailed.
I'd suggest to use 'mtb:scale:apm'. This uses the established tag and adds a subtag, dedicated to your scheme.
map per (2020-11-07 21:24:55+00:00): Hallo AceTur,

die erlaubte Höchstgeschwindigkeit ist für die Kategorisierung von Straßen eigentlich nicht entscheident. Ich finde das highway=trunk an diser Stelle sinnvoller ist. Zudem sind die nördlich und südlich angrenzenden Straßenabschnitte bereits als highway=trunk gekennzeichnet.

Viele Grüße
map per
glibbertorsten (2019-01-11 11:51:18+00:00): Hallo! Das die Neuendorfer Straße Ampeln hat, wird die Ziolkowskistraße sicherlich auch welche haben?!
Littlericket (2019-01-11 13:28:11+00:00): Hi, nee... Lilienthalstraße/Zielkowski haben ein "Give-Way", ist ja auch so im Editor drin, aber Ampeln haben sie nicht, nur die Neuendorfer...
glibbertorsten (2019-01-11 14:07:27+00:00): Ah verstehe. Wenn du dich auskennst, bitte das Tagging des Vorfahrt-Gewährens noch auf die Straße verlagern (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=give_way) und bei den Ampeln die Art des Fußgängerüberweges angeben. Danke und Gruß
StephaneP (2019-01-18 11:37:40+00:00): Hello mister !
A priori, c'est network plutôt que brand qu'il faut utiliser pour les stations Vélib' :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6200623204
A+
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
overflorian (2019-01-18 14:29:14+00:00): bien joué, merci stéphane
Stereo (2019-01-11 15:02:50+00:00): Bonjour Lyon-St-Clair ! On met d'habitude le quai dans le tag 'ref', comme ça les différents logiciels peuvent facilement grouper les stations par nom. Bonne cartographie :)
Lyon-St-Clair (2019-01-11 15:05:02+00:00): Bien vu ! Le pire c'est que j'ai remplis le "ref"... Allez, je corrige de suite.
kartonage (2019-01-11 12:20:06+00:00): Hallo Wolfshour, 
sind die 7 km/h an den verkehrsberuhigten Straßen explizit ausgeschildert? 

Desweiteren ist der "share_busway"-Wert an der Frankfurter Allee schon recht spezifisch gesetzt worden. Eine shared_lane ist das nicht (gibt es in Deutschland so ohnehin selten bis gar nicht).

Die Tags hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662326006) sind auch etwas zu viel. ski, horse und snowmobile werden da sicher nicht beschildert verboten sein. bicycle eventuell auch nicht. Hier ist es oft besser, das so simpel wie möglich anzugehen.

Schöne Grüße
pio2_122 (2019-01-13 17:52:48+00:00): Nie ma takiej nazwy ulicy, jak "droga lokalna"
Yohn79 (2019-01-13 20:32:13+00:00): Nie ma takiej nazwy, ale jest taka droga. Jakbyś spojrzał dokładnie, to byś zauważył, że droga lokalna łączy się z DK11 oraz DK15. Drogi krajowe to nie są jakieś tam drogi gminne, tylko główne arterie kraju. Jak jest wypadek lub zator (wystarczy śledzić artykuły prasowe) i główna droga kraju jest zablokowana kilka godzin to jest to jakaś alternatywa objazdu. Na stronie www to może brzydko wygląda, ale w nawigacji samochodowej się przydaje.
pio2_122 (2019-01-13 20:55:20+00:00): Zanim zacznę: proszę, zmień ton wypowiedzi.

Nawigacje spokojnie poradzą sobie z wyznaczeniem objazdu. Samemu też można wywnioskować, że jest do lokalna droga i może być objazdem.
Do określenia parametrów drogi służą inne tagi.
Nie rozumiem, w jaki sposób nazwa "Droga lokalna" może komukolwiek pomóc.
Yohn79 (2019-01-13 21:27:27+00:00): Samemu wywnioskować? Chyba teraz sobie kpisz. Po to jest czytelna mapa. Człowiek w trakcie jazdy nie zawsze jest w stanie wprowadzać nowe dane do nawigacji. Poza tym to jest niebezpieczne. Nawigacja nie wyznacza sama z siebie objazdu. Bo niby skąd nawigacja ma wiedzieć, że jest np. wypadek? 
Poza tym tag dotyczy drogi lokalnej. Nawigacja to zrozumie. Tagi są odpowiednio otagowane dla nawigacji. Nazwa jest stricte dla ludzi.
maraf24 (2019-01-14 12:44:45+00:00): Droga lokalna była tu już przed twoją edycją. Nie wiem, po co ją usunąłeś i wyrysowałeś na nowo. Wystarczyło uzupełnić tagi.
Yohn79 (2019-01-14 13:19:29+00:00): Droga była ale niedokładna. Łączyła się też z inną drogą lokalną, która de facto nie jest drogą lokalną ale dojazdową i szła w kierunku DK11/15, ale tam nie ma przejazdu, bo są barierki. I finał tego galimatiasu był taki, że na GPS-ie widać, że idzie droga ale tak naprawdę wyjeżdżało się na osiedlu, a nie na DK11. Poza tym droga lokalna jest jedna ale ma 4 różne nawierzchnie. Dodałem odpowiednie tagi. Łatwiej mi było wyrysowanie tego na nowo, jak dłubanie przy tym co było. Teraz jak to wyrysowałem jest dobrze, bo wyrysowałem jak to faktycznie wygląda. Drogi osiedlowe mają swoje tagi, drogi dojazdowe też i została jedna droga, którą nazwałem "droga lokalna" ale już to usunąłem rano i dałem "noname". Pewnie trzeba poczekać, aż zmiany zostaną zaktualizowane. Dziś przy mapie nic nie grzebię, bo nie mam zbytnio czasu.
Hjart (2019-01-11 15:57:21+00:00): This change destroyed the beach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6125572
Please note that the coastline of Fanø needs to be split for this relation to work correctly and that I'm reverting this changeset.
eggie (2019-01-11 12:02:09+00:00): Dag J... Helaas verwijder je ook de landuse en houden we alleen een transparant over op de kaart met Leisure=park.
Beter is het juist om in dat vlak je landuse in te vullen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-01-11 12:29:43+00:00): De landuse=grass heb ik hersteld.
Ectra (2019-01-11 11:40:39+00:00): Parking lot
eggie (2019-01-11 12:04:45+00:00): Probeer svp de paden niet aan de landuse te plakken. Dit geeft later veel problemen bij verschuivingen. Ook kun je met editor iD beter het gebied kleiner houden van je edits. Schuiven in de editmodus  geeft vaak schade aan de kaart. Je edit en schuift immers met de linkermuistoets.
MVG,
eggie
Dit waren je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66223868
gendy54 (2019-01-28 20:46:25+00:00): Bonsoir,

J'ai modifié le nœud du cabinet infirmier. 
Le tag hospital est réservé aux... hôpitaux. 
Pour l'adresse, elle est déjà renseignée sur le bâtiment, donc ca aurait fait un doublon. Si vous voulez vraiment mettre l'adresse sur le noeus, utilisez addr:full (adresse en mode libre).

Bonne carto ;)
mavl (2019-01-24 06:32:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66591396 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2478].
Marc Mongenet (2023-06-28 11:44:54+00:00): Why this violation of the fundamental OSM mapping rule to map what is on the ground?
Richard (2023-06-29 14:29:40+00:00): In what way are the big "city centre" road signs in Truro (which I'm guessing you've never visited) not "on the ground"?
SK53 (2023-06-29 14:35:05+00:00): Hi Marc,

You seem to misunderstand how OSM works. The OSM-UK community has well-established principles as to how to map place=*: they do not use the population at all, but place the population in the sensibly-named population tag. Britain has a number of places with a small population which have been cities for hundreds of years. There are differences between the constituent parts of the United Kingdom too. More recent elevation to city status has been through official charters, such as the recent elevation of Southend-on-Sea to city status.

You must always take what is written in the wiki with a pinch of salt. A population-based approach has never satisfactorily coped with differences between, or even, within countries.

But, the most important rule of OSM is about building consensus. If the thousands of contributors in the UK have been happy with a particular value of place=* for 10 or more years there has to be an absolutely compelling (documented) reason for change.

Yours,

Jerry aka SK53
Marc Mongenet (2023-06-29 23:47:42+00:00): Hello Jerry, thank you for your courteous reply.

I also share the opinion that population alone is an insufficient criterion. There are places that are the most important communication, business and cultural hubs around. They often have an international airport, a major railway station, a university, and are therefore known far and wide. They appear in numerous air, rail and road destinations. And this corresponds reasonably well to the short description in the OSM wiki: "place=city: The largest urban settlement or settlements within the territory."

General maps make these places visible at scales comparable to openstreetmap.org zoom levels 6-8.


As you can probably imagine, Britain isn't the only country where old villages have been called "cities" since the Middle Ages. And it's a pretty common and rather childish joke for the locals to pass off their village as a "city" by putting forward arguments in the same half-serious tone as Richard. But the best ones are the shortest.

That the UK community of 10 years ago, when OSM was still very incomplete, stumbled on this slightly eccentric consensus, why not. But OSM is a global map. And today, Western Europe in OSM presents on its north-western flank a mishmash of the Middle Ages (because of the place=city in Britain) and the 21st century (the motorway network, for example). A joke that lasts 10 years isn't funny, it's starting to turn into a shameful stain. The UK community should think again, seriously this time.
Richard (2023-06-30 07:05:29+00:00): I don't think you quite understand. It isn't the "locals passing off their village". Truro officially has city status according to the British government. So does Bangor.

But your suggestion of looking at a rendered map of z7 is a good one. If you take cycle.travel's rendering at z7 (disclaimer - my site), which shows place=city, then Britain, Germany, Italy, Greece, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, Belgium, the east coast of the USA... all have a broadly similar density of nodes. It's France that is the outlier. The French community should think again, seriously this time.
Richard (2023-06-30 08:57:07+00:00): So let's put some numbers to this:

select *,pop_est/ct as pop_per_city from (select count(*) as ct,c.name,pop_est from country_polygons c join planet_osm_point on place='city' and st_contains(geom,way) group by c.name,c.pop_est) as q order by pop_per_city desc;

       name       |      pop_per_city      
------------------+------------------------
 Austria          |   1459068.833333333333
 France           |   1427790.659574468085
 Czechia          |   1186080.333333333333
 Ireland          |   1002220.400000000000
 Germany          |    948164.905882352941
 Belgium          |    883949.692307692308
 Switzerland      |    823630.300000000000
 United Kingdom   |    681783.705263157895
 Slovakia         |    680728.625000000000
 Italy            |    654082.126315789474
 Estonia          |    625790.500000000000
 Luxembourg       |    594130.000000000000
 Poland           |    582973.772727272727
 Lithuania        |    564771.800000000000
 Denmark          |    560594.800000000000
 Spain            |    520831.478723404255
 Hungary          |    518465.526315789474
 Netherlands      |    502491.735294117647
 Sweden           |    498024.350000000000
 Romania          |    398703.092592592593
 Slovenia         |    394425.200000000000
 Norway           |    354669.666666666667
 Bosnia and Herz. |    350561.909090909091
 Iceland          |    339747.000000000000
 Croatia          |    330161.153846153846
 Bulgaria         |    273135.000000000000
 Greece           |    269211.925000000000
 Serbia           |    245207.724137931034
 Kosovo           |    236906.250000000000
 Albania          |    234460.538461538462
 Finland          |    228800.750000000000
 Latvia           |    194464.300000000000
 Macedonia        |    140248.066666666667
 Montenegro       |     91792.857142857143
 Isle of Man      |     88815.000000000000
 Portugal         |     73239.959459459459
 San Marino       |     33537.000000000000
 Gibraltar        |     29396.000000000000

In other words, the UK is not at all atypical in the number of place=city nodes for Europe, scaled per head of population. Most similarly sized countries have a comparable density. France and Austria are outliers.
Marc Mongenet (2023-06-30 19:18:16+00:00): Richard, 
1. you think I'm ignorant
2. your arguments are inane
I won't argue on these grounds.
Richard (2023-06-30 21:12:18+00:00): I’m entirely relaxed about you not arguing if that means you’re not going to steam in and screw up the UK consensus again. It’d be lovely if you could turn your attention to the more pertinent fact that most small-scale rendered OSM maps of France look like ass because of the very long standing density issues. Good luck!
Marc Mongenet (2023-07-01 00:23:11+00:00): I won't change the map data. I have written in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:place%3Dcity what I think of the consensus of some communities.

England population density is 434/km². France population density is 119/km².  And in 25% of the departments, it is less than 50/km². See https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagonale_du_vide.
DevonshireBoy42 (2023-07-01 09:35:51+00:00): From the wiki:

Use the place=city tag to identify the largest settlement or settlements within a territory, including national, state and provincial capitals, and other major conurbations.

Truro is the provincial capital and largest settlement in Cornwall, having visited it the signs on the ground say it is a city. While it might not meet the criteria on some basis it's still the largest settlement in a less populated area, its hardly crowding the map.

The violation is not from my edit, but from the previous armchair mapper who had bulk edited all city and town nodes in the UK to follow some arbitrary threshold.

A much more valid complaint would be about Wells and St David's, but for the sake of two village sized cities, isn't going to result in a cluttered map and even though they are small they're probably still useful reference point for getting a bearing (especially St David's, is in such a remote point it's the only landmark).

The world is full of historical quirks and to map it other that it is would be to admit that aesthetic is more important than accuracy and given the link between OSM, wikidata and Wikipedia are you also going to convince those projects that their city lists should also be changed? If you achieve that then you'll just have to convince the King and the UK government to change it as well. I found and fix this revision after using OSM as a database to render a map of all UK cities and was surprised to see the list was missing some and had some towns instead.
SomeoneElse (2023-07-01 11:19:45+00:00): @Marc Mongenet - you clearly still have a problem with this, but perhaps a discussion on one changeset and a talk page on the wiki (where almost no-one will see it) probably aren't the best way to win people over to your point of view?  I suspect that some of the language used here and there ("Laziness", "Dogmatism", "Short-sightedness") won't persuade many people either.
Maybe a breath of fresh air followed by a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org would be better?  Explain what you believe is the problem and why it is a problem, and explain the approaches that various OSM communities have taken.
Regards,
Andy
Marc Mongenet (2023-07-02 00:01:21+00:00): Hello Andy, I didn't know the wiki was barely read, thank you for giving a link to https://community.openstreetmap.org.
Marc Mongenet (2023-07-02 00:56:25+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse,

You are right, being a provincial capital is a criteria to consider. Being a destination with signs on major roads is also a criteria (but I found more Redruth than Truro).

I read in Wikipedia about Cornwall that "the largest settlements are Falmouth (23,061), Newquay (20,342), St Austell (19,958), and Truro (18,766)." Is Wikipedia wrong, or have you been misled by the OSM tagging when writing that Truro is the largest settlement in Cornwall?

To stay on Wikipedia, I just read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_status_in_the_United_Kingdom and the very first sentence ends with: " which might or might not meet the generally accepted definition of cities."

Still in Wikipedia, Truro is not in most list of cities I read: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_de_villes_du_Royaume-Uni,  https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lijst_van_grote_Britse_steden, https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_ora%C8%99elor_din_Regatul_Unit. It is in https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_St%C3%A4dte_im_Vereinigten_K%C3%B6nigreich but in a secondary list.

In fact, I don't see how a sign with the word "city" can be of any relevance for OSM. The "city" in "place=city" is just a computer code that could be renamed overnight to "settlement_level_1". I'd go so far as to say that  it were the case from the start, mapping of place=* would have been much much more consistent across the world. It would also be clearer for many non-native English speaker.  For example, the difference between city and town is a bit mysterious to me, both being translated as "ville" in French.
ulamm (2019-01-11 12:59:33+00:00): Nach meiner letzten Änderung gab es doch ziemliche Probleme. Darum jetzt nach demselben System getaggt, das sich bei anderen Wasserflächen (von Flüssen oder Bächen durchströmten Seen) bewährt hat.
Владимир К (2019-01-13 15:22:31+00:00): ты че творишь?...
Serg Podarevsky (2019-01-15 17:14:50+00:00): Ты ходил через этот "перевал"? Согласись, что здесь никакого перевала нет.
mavl (2019-01-24 06:31:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66591396 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2478].
axline (2019-01-13 18:44:43+00:00): Правка представляет собой откаченные ранее данные из Яндекса. Пользователь игнорирует правила проекта.
RajeshSundaram (2019-01-21 04:46:55+00:00): Test
Veena BS (2019-01-21 04:49:55+00:00): It is based on local knowledge.
eggie (2019-01-11 14:46:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-01-11 14:56:18+00:00): Dag megrund. je hebt de St Jozefstraat gedeeltelijk van construction gehaald. 
lanes=yes en bucycle=yes hoort er niet op.
horse=yes hoeft ook niet. Het is allemaal default.
 construction=residential moet er nog af. 
De Sint Bartholomeusstraat heb je op destination gezet. Dat betekent dat de straat niet zal routeren. Staat hier een bord : Alleen voor aanwonenden?
Kijk je er nog even naar Dit was je edit.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66226461

MVG,
Eggie
m@nfred (2019-01-11 16:03:58+00:00): Hoi Eggie
Bedankt voor je reactie. Er staat (nog) geen bord, maar het is doodlopend. Net als de Sint Jozefstraat trouwens. 

Ik zal nog even kijken naar de overige punten die je hebt aangegeven. 

Groeten Manfred.
eggie (2019-01-11 17:35:02+00:00): Oke Manfred..  doodlopend kun je aangeven met noexit=yes op de eindnode. maar wellicht loopt er straks een voetpadverbinding. Up to you!. 

De St Jozefstraat zal wel een vervolg krijgen dus daar hoeft dat niet.  
Succes verder,
Eggie
m@nfred (2019-01-11 18:18:06+00:00): Wat betekent construction=residential eigenlijk precies?
eggie (2019-01-11 18:56:55+00:00): Het is gewoon de verduidelijking van 
highway=construction
(Je ziet dat aan de rendering)
gevolgd door:

construction=residential
Dat kan dan weg als de weg klaar is, want er is immers geen construction meer. 

Net als
highway=service
service=parking_aisle
Die heb ik toegevoegd in dat binnenstuk.
De renderer (kaartenmaker) maakt er dan een smallere weg van.
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-11 18:58:29+00:00): Dat tussenstuk zou dan nog de tag service=drive_through moeten hebben.
m@nfred (2019-01-11 19:18:48+00:00): Okay. Helderder. Ik heb nog wat gebouwen en een grasperken toegevoegd.
eggie (2019-01-11 20:11:40+00:00): Van dat appartement heb ik even landuse=construction gemaakt. Dat kun je laten importeren. Simpel verzoek. Zie commentaar betreffende changeset.
m@nfred (2019-01-11 21:04:43+00:00): Bedankt voor alle info. Het kost mij teveel tijd om al die regeltjes uit te zoeken en laat dat liever aan anderen over. Ik heb de straten toegevoegd en aangepast. Ik laat het vanuit hier weer over aan jou.

Nogmaals dank!
eggie (2019-01-11 21:17:44+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor je bijdrage. 
MVG,
Eggie
viloan (2019-01-11 13:31:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!