piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Pierce (2019-01-07 12:20:16+00:00): Thanks for doing this, i'm looking at these issues within Victoria myself.
whalerich (2019-01-09 11:12:32+00:00): Здравствуйте! Ваши лесные массивы реально красивые. А как Вы сами оцениваете качество механизма автораспознавания? Хотя бы на примере Ивановка-Короли-Долгановка (Тюкалинский)?
Alecs01 (2018-12-31 13:50:18+00:00): Bentornato select, ancora con il vizio di cancellare tutti i telefoni del mondo?
L'imaginaire (2021-05-26 06:59:10+00:00): image link is now broken
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-05-28 12:15:39+00:00): Niet veel aan te doen, behalve een nieuwe foto te gaan maken :shrug:
L'imaginaire (2021-05-28 18:09:44+00:00): ok, ik zal de image tag verwijderen
Geofreund1 (2019-04-30 10:09:37+00:00): Hallo Maurice2010,
am Neumarkt/Mittelstraße hast du ein Konstrukt eingetragen ohne Tag. Man weiß also nicht, was das darstellen soll.
Bitte ergänzen oder löschen.
apm-wa (2019-03-21 08:56:35+00:00): Что за госучереждение "Алтын Заман" на Битарапе7
BoomEngine (2021-05-07 22:02:05+00:00): Добрый день!
Скажите пожалуйста, что за "механизм автораспознавания " для JOSM вы использовали? Есть аналогичная потребность, но не нахожу нужного модуля в JOSM. Спасибо!
andergrin (2018-12-23 19:36:45+00:00): Тегом building позначається контур будівлі, а не земальна ділянка під ним, для цього є тег landuse, для приватної ділянки з будинком це landuse=residential
smaprs (2018-12-23 21:19:11+00:00): Olá Fernando, bem vindo.  
Muito boas suas contribuições.  
Apenas uma nota:  
A etiquetação para uso residencial (landuse=residential) só se usa no limite real das construções existentes, como um vila densificada.  
  
Existem construções cobrindo todo este perímetro, densamente?  
  
Se não, se for uma vasta área, como reunindo vários lotes rurais, melhor usar place=allotments para o mesmo perímetro, com os nomes que você colocou.   
Mais info em: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place  
Att., Sérgio
Fernando Teixeira Medina (2018-12-24 00:27:23+00:00): Muito obrigado a dica! Já ajustei, conforme sugerido.

Outras dicas que tiver, pode ficar a vontade em dizer
VictorIE (2018-12-27 04:00:30+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

You might look at the values here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway when drawing railways. Realise that if you use, e.g. railway=rail instead of railway=abandoned, that abandoned lines will show as if they are current, which is misleading.

I don't think rail=proposed is recognised, but in using such a tag, that the proposal  needs to have solid backing, e.g. by a railway undertaking or local council development plan.
Jakka (2018-12-24 09:18:25+00:00): footway zonder verder connectie ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657398796#map=19/51.05148/3.69997
Osm1980 (2019-01-09 16:59:48+00:00): bazi masir ha  bedoon tag sabt shodan????
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-23 22:33:07+00:00): Please pay close attention to construction tagging and notes...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65722658
nikolasknight (2018-12-23 20:53:35+00:00): Якщо будинок схований за деревами, то не потрібно його знищувати взагалі, плю сто знаходиться біля будинку, а не займає територію будинку. Прийму до відома корективи з приводу подвіря, і попрошу не вносити глобальні зміни на карті Крижополя. А також, видалення точок маестро як ресторана і готелю, навіщо?
ForstEK (2018-12-23 19:56:09+00:00): with https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1492856 as source
b-jazz (2018-12-24 04:57:59+00:00): Good evening kartler175. I'm guessing from the "reverter" in the "created_by" tag in the changeset that you reverted some change? You might want to take a look at what your change did to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/185937622 since it moved it far away and broke the ferry route and made a service road travel across water. 
I'm not sure if the revert broke anything else, but this is something that I noticed.
freeExec (2018-12-25 10:18:38+00:00): Вы стали всё двигать, а вы выравнивали снимок по трекам прежде чем решили, что текущие положение здания было не верным?
santamariense (2018-12-23 20:21:37+00:00): No JOSM, para deixar um building (prédio) no esquadro, seleciona ele e tecla Q
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65723253
Jakka (2018-12-24 09:36:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657410281#map=18/50.97523/2.92851 is area kan niet alleen bestaan. maar wat/welke ?
DaveF (2019-01-25 17:08:00+00:00): Hi 
Are you aware "It is not recommended to store ephemeral data relating to ratings in OSM":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Food_Hygiene_Rating_System

The vast majority of contributors just add fhrs:id as _all_ other data (such as business type & authority) are already in other tags or obtainable by reading the FHRS database.
It saves you a _lot_ of editing time.
Константин Гам (2019-01-13 11:58:05+00:00): Сквер по документам это хорошо, но мапим мы то что есть в реальности, тут помойка и 1.5 дерева
SHARCRASH (2019-05-24 14:42:20+00:00): Hello, you totally untagged this element https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138713551/history Is it destroyed?
mapatite (2019-10-31 14:52:15+00:00): Hi OrionX, thanks for mapping! I noticed that you have been creating some over complicated junctions here. Please try to refrain from adding links, road segments, and turn restrictions that are not visible in imagery. Here is a link to some best practices:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_for_the_renderer. Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions!
OrionX (2019-11-08 09:39:59+00:00): Hello. Road junctions are created by us solely on the basis of personal observations, as the information on resources like Yandex. Panoramas (https://yandex.ru/maps/) is no longer relevant in our city. In particular, over the past year, all tram traffic has disappeared in the city and tram rails have been removed. Now all major road junctions in the city of Tver are correct with some exceptions (the designation of the number of lanes, pedestrian crossings, traffic lights and public transport routes) and do not require correction, even if your validator shows errors. We will correct all detected errors ourselves. Thanks
Durko_freemap (2018-12-23 21:33:16+00:00): Ahoj Miro,
vitaj v OSM, budova otagovana takmer spravne (urobil som drobnu korekciu). Hlavne Ta poprosim tag name pouzivat len na vlastne mena. slovne spojenie Rodinny dom - nie je meno. Vdaka. Durko
sorcrosc (2018-12-24 00:41:01+00:00): Sembra che tu abbia fatto un "import" di dati del geoportale Emilia romagna.
Per importare da fonti esterne è necessario assicurarsi che la licenza con cui i dati sono forniti sia compatibile con quella di openstreetmap (ODbL). In questo caso se la licenza di origine è CC-BY credo che serva una autorizzazione speciale del proprietario.

In ogni caso per la procedura di importazione si devono seguire le linee guida descritte qui:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Ciao
Lorenzo
Carnildo (2018-12-24 04:47:37+00:00): It looks to me like Otis Orchards is already mapped, a bit to the southeast of where you've placed it.
PMojito (2018-12-24 17:39:20+00:00): I see what you're referring to.  But when searching for addresses nearby, they are showing up in "Tolido", Washington.  Apparently there is an object nearby (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150941531) that is acting as the city/town for this area.  I'm not sure why.  As a proof-of-concept, I'd created a quick polygon to see if I could fix this, by defining the actual boundaries of Otis Orchards.  Long-term, either need to resolve what this Tolido object is.  Or make a complicated Area polygon to represent the actual boundaries of this CDP.
Carnildo (2018-12-24 21:15:18+00:00): I've changed "Tolido" to a "locality", which should remove it from the address-lookup system.
PMojito (2018-12-29 17:58:23+00:00): Thank you, Carnildo!  :)  Happy New Year!
AlexFringilla (2019-04-23 19:07:30+00:00): Что за имя у здания такое, Дива-групп? Это какая-то органазация в этом здании? Может лучше ее обозначить отдельной точкой с опреденным тегом, соответствующим профилю организации?
AndriesWijma (2018-12-24 18:56:39+00:00): Hallo,
Je bent momenteel veel aan het mappen op de grens van Groningen en Fryslân. Ik ben zelf vooral in de omgeving van Kollum actief.
Ik zag dat je in Burum parkeerplaatsen hebt verwijderd. Je kunt van mening zijn dat dit type parkeerterrein niet gemapt hoeft te worden. Dan nog is het niet gewenst om de toevoeging van een andere mapper zomaar te verwijderen.
Ik map zelf erg gedetailleerd zoals je kunt zien in Kollum. Momenteel ben ik bezig met Warfstermolen e.o., en in het nieuwe jaar komt mogelijk Burum aan de beurt, inclusief zulke parkeerplaatsen. Dit ter info en afstemming om dubbel werk te voorkomen.
Fijne Kerst toegewenst!
mueschel (2018-12-28 11:21:16+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tags on this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230052498
ral = bare_rock looks like a mistake.

Jan
user_1470980 (2018-12-28 11:41:44+00:00): Gefixt,
Danke für den Hinweis.
eggie (2018-12-23 22:05:23+00:00): Oke.. Je hebt nu zelf een nieuwe adresnode gemaakt, maar de bedoeling is dat de info op de BAG adresnode komt.
Nu staat de info eigenlijk weer dubbel. Wanneer je op de BAG adresnode zou klikken en alle tags zichtbaar maakt zie je dezelfde tags staan. 
Kijk je zelf nog even. 
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-23 22:22:50+00:00): Hier een leerzaam filmpje  hoe je de POI kunt samenvoegen met JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/SwNPndGRUZA
eggie (2018-12-24 08:51:40+00:00): Dylan...De dubbele tagging heb ik verwijderd. Het was al goed getagd hier.
Combineren was ook niet nodig
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2018-12-26 23:57:12+00:00): Hier gaat wel het een en ander mis.
Je geeft aandat het een busbaan is maar mat de tag motor_vehicle= designated geef je iedereen weer toestemming om daar gebruik van te maken.
Access=no en psv=yes zijn daarvoor de juiste tags.
Verder voeg je toll=no toe. Dat zou dan ook van toepassing zijn voor 99,99999 % van alle wegen in Nederland !  Als je dat overal wilt toevoegen ben je nog jaren bezig :-)
Waarom je het toevoegt is mij een raadsel.
Ik maak wat wijzigingen.
Leo Slager (2018-12-27 00:00:50+00:00): En ik zal gelijk ook de routerelatie van bus 388 over de busbaan leggen.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-18 03:35:24+00:00): Hi, Ukundji. I did split in tertiary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/657426121) and changed the classification of the other way into unclassified highways based on Maxar Premium Imagery
abrensch (2018-12-30 19:27:35+00:00): Hallo Fürfelder,
ich habe Deine oneway-Markierung für die B240 südlich vom Kreisel enrfernt, weil ich vermute, dass das ein Unfall war?

Gruss, Arndt
Gino-52 (2018-12-24 16:34:03+00:00): Ich glaube, dass ist was schief gelaufen.
Der halbe Parkplatz ist weg.
surveyor54 (2018-12-25 16:05:17+00:00): Hallo Gino,

nee, das sieht so aus, siehe Esri World Imagery.

Die Hälfte der Parkplätze wurde entfernt und ein etwa 40 m breiter Grünstreifen (Rasen und Bodendecker) von der Rudolf-Walter-Straße Richtung  Haupteingang Höffner angelegt.

Wenn ich was übersehen habe, melde dich.

Gruß
surveyor
freebeer (2020-04-15 06:29:31+00:00): greetz,

in this changeset you tweaked https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651845815 , a winding footway overlaid atop several other roads.

i suspect there is not a footway down the centre of the street, but at best on one or both sides.

alternatively, each of the afflicted streets could be given the tag.

or this is pokemon mapping and should be purged, i dunno, i came here for another reason and got distracted by this.

thanks
b-jazz (2020-04-16 15:58:20+00:00): I suspect that you're right, and that way should be corrected. 

There were two problems with the way. The first was that it overlapped itself and made reuse of nodes incorrectly. The second is that it is using the same nodes as another path incorrectly.

I fixed the first problem, but didn't work on the second problem.
Te-Ika (2018-12-26 20:50:46+00:00): Hey Map-Finder,
I am looking at these intersections and I noticed you didn't connect two crossing ways. I fixed that. I am wondering why you didn't classify these as links though.
Thanks for your input!
Te-ika
opendcc (2021-05-06 06:36:41+00:00): Hello, what do you mean with entrance=door? Please consider entrance=yes and door=...; additional, entrance is normally placed on a building outline.
mueschel (2018-12-28 11:17:07+00:00): Hi,
you used the tags "school:public" and "school_public" here. This tag is new and not used in any other place. 
You could use the tag "operator_type = public" instead.

Jan
marczoutendijk (2022-02-13 11:09:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6157626147
Here you use man_made=tree. Better is natural=tree. Or is it an artwork. It is also located on the roof of a building...
mikkolukas (2022-02-13 11:45:52+00:00): It IS actually a man made tree, built of LEGO bricks :)

But you are right, the correct tagging is an artwork. I have updated the tags to clarify this and added further details as well.

Thanks for the help, bringing attention to this :)
marczoutendijk (2022-02-13 12:48:23+00:00): Thakns for this explanation!
naoliv (2018-12-24 18:28:30+00:00): syberdyner, porque você apagou esse monte de objetos aqui?
syberdyner (2018-12-24 18:31:12+00:00): eu fiz os objetos e segundo falaram não pode encostar eles nas ruas então resolvi apagar tudo e fazer de novo
naoliv (2018-12-24 18:33:57+00:00): Ah... se você conseguir só desgrudar o objeto, é melhor (ao invés de apagar e depois criar novamente)
Mas sim, o mais correto é não grudar a área com as ruas ao lado mesmo.
atcomapper (2018-12-24 13:48:15+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65740929
Glassman (2018-12-24 03:11:10+00:00): Please don't add features that can't be verified. I'm reverting this edit.
streckenkundler (2018-12-24 14:30:55+00:00): Was haben die Rollen "influent" und "tributary"   in der Relation http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=216440 zu sagen? Die sorgen nun dafür, daß der Tollensesee trockengefallen ist...
Ich hab auch im Forum nachgefragt: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=730977#p730977

streckenkundler
ulamm (2018-12-24 15:57:27+00:00): Ich habe natürlich nicht beabsichtigt, dass der Tollensesee als trockene Fläche in einem Gewässerring dargestellt werden soll. 
Es hat aber auch der Tollensesee, wie die meisten Seen in Deutschland Zuflüsse. Und alle Seen in Deutschland tragen Gewässerkennzahlen, entweder die des duch sie hindurchfließenden Gewässers, oder eine oder mehrere, die von denen zu- oder abfließender Gewässer abgeleitet sind (als oberster Flussabschnitt des des abführenden Flusses oder unterste Abschnitte der zuführenden. Das handhaben die Umweltbehörden der verschiedenen Bundesländer teilweise unterschiedlich.
Map-Peter (2018-12-25 13:46:22+00:00): Ich war u.a. heute vor Ort - der Tollensesee ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/216440 ) ist gut mit Wasser gefüllt. 
Also bitte den in OSM aktuell trocken gefallenen See wieder fluten. 
Danke 
 
Gruß Peter
ulamm (2018-12-25 14:10:42+00:00): Guten Tag Peter,
vorgestern hatte ich den See leider "entleert", indem ich zu- und abfließende Gewässer in seine Multipolygon-Relation eingebunden hatte. Inzwischen habe ich diese Flüsse und Bäche wieder aus der Relation herausgenommen. Der Renderer braucht, wie immer, je nach Maßstab unterschiedlich viel Zeit, um die Korrektur wahrzunehmen.

Schöne Weihnachten, Ulrich
geri-oc (2018-12-25 15:42:28+00:00): Humanitarian machts z.Z. schnell:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65726963#map=13/53.4783/13.1953&layers=H
Schöne Feiertage Gerd
Akkurator (2019-01-13 22:11:59+00:00): Haben die dort jetzt allen Ernstes eine Ampel aufgestellt???
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/36307125
user_8613419 (2019-01-13 23:01:46+00:00): Ja, siehe https://www.schwaebische.de/landkreis/landkreis-ravensburg/wangen-im-allgaeu_artikel,-bedarfsampel-geht-in-betrieb-radweg-entsteht-_arid,10965183.html
Akkurator (2019-01-13 23:38:24+00:00): Verstehe. Bedarfsampel für Bauhof.
Hab's mittlerweile auch von anderer Seite bestätigt bekommen.
Habe versucht, das Tagging entsprechend anzupassen.

Auch hier hätte ein CS-Kommentar die Rückfrage erspart.

PS: ich kann's noch nicht ganz fassen - eine Ampel mitten auf dieser Straße. Ich kann' die noch als B18 mit autobahnähnlichem Verkehrsaufkommen. 20 Jahre lang fast täglich diese Kreuzung von Niederwangen her nach links Richtung Wangen überquert per Schulbus und später Auto - wie oft habe ich mir da eine Ampel gewünscht...
eggie (2018-12-24 09:24:27+00:00): Hoi.. GB Het verbouwde deel staat nog steeds bij het kadaster zo in hun data. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Tutenburgsestraat%204&resultOffset=0&objectId=0299100000399288&geometry.x=202485.22740052&geometry.y=445199.0425982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0299100000399288
Wellicht even een terugmelding doen. Het komt anders bij update weer verkeerd terug. 
Het grasveld met de paardenbak heb ik omgevormd tot één multipolygoon. Het waren er twee zonder inner. De paardenbak is nu de inner.
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
mueschel (2018-12-28 11:19:55+00:00): Hi,
what do you mean with "school:type"? I guess it should be "isced:level", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:isced:level

And: Please don't use all capital letters for names.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
alirezaaa (2018-12-25 10:34:22+00:00): مهعخهعخهع
viloan (2018-12-24 03:38:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
DavidKewley (2018-12-24 19:25:33+00:00): Reverted because a highway was re-tagged as a business.
stephankn (2020-03-10 05:38:08+00:00): are you aware that by using this tagging style you are adding nothing meaningful to the database? Did you try to map buildings?
chnav (2018-12-24 08:34:36+00:00): Здравствуйте, вот такие проезды к жилым домам
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389388751

это service.

также, пожалуйста, не ставьте теги, которые действуют по-умолчанию и не несут никакой информации, типа oneway=no

Спасибо
chnav (2018-12-24 08:38:28+00:00): Исправил.
mueschel (2018-12-28 11:10:12+00:00): Hi,
you added several new tags here like "wigos:iid". These tags are not used in any other place. But there are already several "ref:wigos" tags in the database. In general, reference ids like these are tagged using a key like "ref:XYZ". Could you have a look and adapt your ids to common tags?

Cheers, Jan
vibrog (2018-12-28 18:00:58+00:00): Thanks for updating me on that, I'll change the tagging.
Supaplex (2019-02-06 14:46:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
vijay kumar reddy b (2018-12-24 07:06:15+00:00): Added missing residential road
Glassman (2018-12-25 00:12:17+00:00): please read the wiki on opening_hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65731985
dmlu (2019-07-25 19:10:46+00:00): Hallo, mir ist aufgefallen, dass Sie die elektrische Ladestation verschoben haben. Ist sie tatsächlich vor dem Haus, und nicht auf dem Parkplatz nebenan?
Frans S (2018-12-29 16:06:47+00:00): Hello, Thank you for mapping on this task.
a request. Please map buildings as building=yes. not as area=yes (11times)
Please review the instructions how to map in ID
Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-01-17 14:17:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657517171 - note that wikipedia tag is for articles about this specific object

as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Chiller is about type of machine it should not be linked using wikipedia tag

if you want to document meaning of man_made=chiller - use OSM Wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page )

If you need help with creating OSM Wiki page I can help
eggie (2018-12-24 09:06:29+00:00): Dag PDOK.. Het kunstwerk staat nu midden op het fietspad. Er naast staat al kunstwerk "1917". Is het niet per abuis dubbel toegevoegd?

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2018-12-26 09:43:08+00:00): Dag pdok.. Omdat ik verder geen reactie heb ontvangen zal ik het kunstwerk op het fietspad verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
abakus_uploader (2018-12-24 23:30:45+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!