piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mustelator (2017-02-11 17:58:13+00:00): ¡Ostia, qué guapo! Me va a ir esa herramienta de maravilla.

Propuse lo del reemplazo porque la misma wiki del exit_to tiene una discusión del 2014 que habla de una transición (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:exit_to#2014). Más que nada pensé que antes de hacer un solo cambio, voy a comentar a ver... No obstante recuerda, además, que me sale un error en esos nodos de la C-59 (moviéndolos 1mm, por ejemplo, para que haga un cambio en ellos y detecte luego el error).

Y gracias por el aporte, me lo apunto. Voy a hacer unos cuantos chequeos pero ya :D
gormo (2014-12-02 08:34:36+00:00): Hi; ich finde natural=riverbed bisher kaum; gibts dazu mehr Doku als http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Driverbed ? Wieso verwendet man das zusätzlich zu "riverbank"?
Speziell meine ich an der Sieber, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262415281 .
t2425b (2014-12-02 21:59:08+00:00): Hallo zurück; die aktuell als waterway=riverbank eingezeichnete Fläche liegt meist trocken, obwohl waterway=riverbank doch eigentlich nur für das Gewässer bzw. die Wasserfläche selbst steht; die aktuelle Situation ist also rein theoretisch die Situation nach der Schneeschmelze (und selbst die gab es 2014 gar nicht). Also wäre es doch sinnvoller, waterway=riverbank durch natural=riverbed zu ersetzen und  intermittend=yes zusätzlich zu verwenden! Allerdings wäre dieses Schema ein komplett neues, welches man bei allen solchen Flüssen umsetzen sollte!
lezurdis (2014-11-23 14:54:32+00:00): Bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap,

Neste changeset apagaste um objeto que descrevia um prédio e que também fazia efeito de POI :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185207531/history
Colocaste no mesmo lugar um POI na forma de um nó :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3199169509

Quando conhecemos a extensão é melhor desenhar a área certa, em vez de colocar só um nó. Se a casa ainda está em pé, não devias remover o prédio.

Outro exemplo, colocaste um nó para o cemitério :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3199169507

Não era preciso, o cemitério já está lá e é muito bem definido porque está desenhado com a extensão completa :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309162414

Assim agora temos 2 cemitérios, em Sagres :-(
Podes remover o nó que adicionaste, ele não traz nenhuma informação nova.
eest9 (2014-11-26 21:49:34+00:00): Grasrelation wurde zerstört.
Nun sind nur mehr die innere der Relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3468841 übrig und die äußere fehlt nun.
Was wurde mit diesem Changeset versucht zu ändern?
lezurdis (2014-11-23 15:12:33+00:00): Olá,

Apagaste varios objetos neste changeset sem dar nenhuma explicação :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1957634404/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1957634403/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3125621066/history

Removeste um parque para caravan e vários bancos para pessoas assentar-se na praça. Se os objetos ainda existam não deves os apagar é uma questão de respeito para a pessoa que antes de ti teve o trabalho de localisar e adicionar esses objetos.

Se houve trabalhos e os objetos já não existam na realidade, devias ter mencionado este facto no comentario no changeset.
Como não deixaste nenhum comentario em todas as tuas alterações não sabemos o que estás a fazer.
rab (2014-11-21 23:16:17+00:00): Hallo,
der "name" tag soll eigentlich nicht in dieser Weise verwendet werden.
Für den Rothaarsteig gibt es eine Routenrealtion.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2018275
Auf geeigneten Karten wird das auch ensprechend gerendert.
http://www.wanderreitkarte.de/index.php?lon=8.1811&lat=50.8083&zoom=14
lezurdis (2014-11-23 15:23:36+00:00): Olá,

Mais uma vez apagaste um prédio :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221195473/history

Talvez o prédio não estava bem desenhado ?
Agora ele não tem desenho nenhum. Como não deixaste nenhum comentário, qual é a razão para teres apagado este prédio ?
emacsen (2014-11-22 03:51:12+00:00): What is this changeset? It's massive (in geography not the number of nodes) and automated? What is being changed?
sommerluk (2014-11-22 06:55:38+00:00): Some nodes that where tagged as junction=yes had an place=locality (I suppose to force openstreetmap.org to render it). As this are junctions and not localities, and as rendering works now also without this trick, I removed it (I should have made a better changeset comment).
jeka p (2016-06-12 09:36:14+00:00): Hallo. Hast Du hier absichtlich die Strasse als Brücke markiert oder ist es ein Fehler?
Gruss,
Jeka
zimba (2014-11-22 15:20:05+00:00): Ist das haus mit der adresse "Neudorfstrasse 3" wirklich rund?
lezurdis (2014-11-23 15:40:06+00:00): Olá,

Mais uma vez apagaste vários objetos sem dar nenhuma explicação, principalmente prédios e landuse como por exemplo :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180163535/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223921967/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96396835/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96396812/history

Pelo o que vejo nas imagens áereas esses objetos estavam bem desenhados e não vejo nenhuma explicação por ter os apagados.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-26 14:59:41+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313903392#map=18/53.07854/-2.20189 seems to be unjoined at one end?  Presumably it should join Silverstone Crescent?
joe egg (2014-11-26 20:12:23+00:00): Dont understand . Are you saying all road or path junctions should be joined ? Most are , but I can find some that are not . I may have unjoined them to edit the line of the road.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-27 00:26:49+00:00): Yes, if one road or path joins another road or path, then they should be joined.  If they're not, then routing software won't be able to send people from one to the other.  Sometimes it can be tricky to see if things are actually joined or not - you have to zoom right in in the editor to see.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-23 19:55:04+00:00): For info I've stuck "highway=unclassified" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309678331 based on the previous "bridge" tag.
gormur (2014-11-25 01:00:15+00:00): Hi!
Welcome to openstreetmap :)
You tagged a node as "rr". I don't know exactly what that means. Perhaps you can explain in words?
mweper (2014-11-22 14:50:56+00:00): Por favor, ubique correctamente el nodo que creó sobre la rotonda del Parque Mitre, allí no hay nada más que flores.
RSergei (2014-11-22 19:33:29+00:00): А разве не сквозной проезд сейчас дальше во дворы? Там и к детскому саду проезд есть. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39627655
Hjart (2014-11-22 12:07:20+00:00): Det ville nok være passende at tagge Mollerup polygonen med landuse=residential også
yellowsoar (2014-11-25 09:37:06+00:00): 是go map!! XDDD
TheKumi (2014-11-28 17:31:42+00:00): Das ist der in Meidling, der hat gestern aufgemacht. Der in der Mariahilfer Straße hat schon länger offen. Obwohl ich mich ja freue, wenn meine Fotos hier zur Beweisführung verwendet werden.
edilqueirozdearaujo (2014-11-24 17:11:21+00:00): dica: uma boa dica é desenhar a área do prédio e marcar os valores nessa área. Se o prédio não tem definição do que é, utilize  building=yes | exemplo -> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27001671
edilqueirozdearaujo (2014-11-27 18:54:46+00:00): Muito bem! Em caso de não definição do que seja o prédio, pode deixar apenas como building=yes. Se tiver mais de uma função no mesmo edifício, use um ponto para cada um. Resultado → https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27074548
gileri (2014-11-22 18:48:28+00:00): Cette relation est utilisée uniquement pour lier les deux itinéraires (aller et retour) de la ligne C2. Ses membres doivent être uniquement des relations type=route (Idem pour les deux changesets suivants)
emacsen (2014-11-22 14:10:26+00:00): Hi Deividj,

Welcome to OSM and congrats on your first edit!

Unfortunately it looks like for your first edit, you made a single point, with no attributes. What were you trying to do- maybe I can help.
kocio (2016-03-23 11:37:42+00:00): Hej, co to jest za pomnik właściwie? Na podkładzie Geoportalu nic w tym miejscu nie widzę, w Bingu też nic.
MarkusHD (2015-04-19 23:42:49+00:00): Eine versteckte Abkürzung (Treppe +Pfad) nahe der Brücke wurde in diesem Änderungssatz gelöscht, warst du wirklich vor Ort? Ich habe mich heute vergewissert, dass sie immer noch existiert und benutzbar ist und sie wiederhergestellt. Siehe z.B. Treppe: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98811397/history#map=19/49.06845/8.76534
psboypl (2014-11-22 17:53:08+00:00): Cześć, skąd taki przebieg al. Stabłowickiej i obwodnicy leśnicy?
Nakaner (2015-03-14 14:33:02+00:00): Woran machst du fest, dass die Strecke Lünen–Münster eine Nebenbahn ist? Die Strecke ist ein eingleisige Hauptbahn!
SomeoneElse (2014-12-18 22:07:59+00:00): Hi - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313949418 seems to be unjoined at one end.  Presumably in reality it joines both roads?

Oh - and welcome to OpenStreetMap :-)
albertoaph (2014-11-22 13:51:16+00:00): Nombre del Barrio
5m4u9 (2014-11-23 01:20:52+00:00): la ruta del bus 209 no es correcta en las secciones (parque lincoln, y desde el puente muyurina). Lo sé porque la última vez que me subí a un bus fue en este e hizo este recorrido. Creo que estas subiendo rutas oficiales, pero aquí debemos reflejar lo real...
こすぎの大学 (2014-11-22 16:40:53+00:00): NECカシオモバイルコミュニケーションズ株式会社
佐藤敏明さん

「デザインは価値の接着剤」

人・生活・地域の対立でなく、対話によるライフデザインが暮らしの関係性を接着して化学変化を起こさせる
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-19 19:37:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1606165668/history has 祖籍 = 許(漳州府詔安縣) that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:01:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3103534402/history has 祖籍 = 蘇(泉州府晉江縣) that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-22 09:27:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1498398277/history has 祖籍 = 謝(漳州府龍溪縣) that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Roel Castro (2014-11-22 14:33:02+00:00): If something we want to know about this street, we can discuss it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-09 12:28:05+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1603295178/history has 祖籍 = 方(泉州府同安縣) that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-22 18:16:27+00:00): Proszę nie dodawać name=Gniazdo Bociana Białego. To jest zbyteczna informacja, która i tak wynika z samych tagów.
chillly (2014-11-22 16:09:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM
I'm not sure quite what you were trying to add to OSM. Is that some sort of walking route? Did you realise that you were updating the live data? It doesn't look like the sort of thing we normally use in OSM. If you need advice as to how to make it useful or if you want me to remove it, please add a comment and I'll try to help.
KatieBiddles (2014-11-22 17:54:33+00:00): I saved this in error so if you could remove that would be great
chillly (2014-11-22 18:10:29+00:00): I have removed it. If you want to see a track of your run on and OSM map, take a look at https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/

I hope you do edit some more
emacsen (2014-11-22 20:39:41+00:00): Hi. Like I said on your other changeset, welcome to OSM. Unfortunately it seems like you're not quite sure what you're doing yet, but you're modifying real objects on the map and making some objects which don't appear tagged, etc. 

I'm going to go ahead and revert this and your other changeset, but you do need to realize that your changes are live and that you should not practice using live OSM objects.
emacsen (2014-11-22 20:46:00+00:00): Reverted in changeset 26960270
lezurdis (2014-12-10 13:38:16+00:00): Pois não é cruzamento, a pior solução foi a que esolheste : adicionar turn-restriction que não era precisam.
O que devias ter feito é colocar o que está na realidade : é simplesmente uma ponte com nada em comum com a Estrada Nacional 1.
Fiz a correção :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316663067#map=19/39.30366/-8.93037

Cumprimentos
robert (2014-12-14 14:57:07+00:00): Did you accidentally remove the name "Oaklands Drive" here? http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=552525
Minh Nguyen (2014-11-23 06:17:27+00:00): Please avoid copying verbatim from CAGIS datasets at this time. They’re free of charge but it isn’t clear whether we can use them in OSM yet. We’re trying to secure permission from them to license their data under terms compatible with OSM’s license. Until then, it’s fine to cite CAGIS as a source to back up information you have otherwise (such as through local knowledge), but please don’t copy. Thanks for understanding.
gmensch (2014-11-23 15:41:06+00:00): So in the meantime, should I change the grounds to be what one would expect the property line to be? i.e. from road to fence?
Minh Nguyen (2014-11-23 22:30:34+00:00): Yes, that would be best. Thanks!

Also, the map currently shows Congregation Ohav Shalom as the only building on the Schilling schoolgrounds. However, from the aerial imagery, it seems like the synagogue is one wing of the building and the school is the other, and both share the same property. I think it would be clearer to have the overall property labeled “Congregation Ohav Shalom;Schilling School for Gifted Children” and each wing of the building labeled separately.
tyr_asd (2017-10-18 06:28:37+00:00): FYI: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1176407
knmat (2014-11-22 16:38:53+00:00): added Website
knmat (2014-11-22 16:51:25+00:00): shops changed the location.
szjjdd (2016-12-07 11:57:49+00:00): What is "313980588, v1" ?
szjjdd (2016-12-07 11:56:55+00:00): What is "313980985, v1" ?
gileri (2014-11-22 19:02:26+00:00): Ici attention à l'ordre des chemins dans la relation. Normalement le chemin doit être continu si l'on suit les ways qui sont dans la relation dans l'ordre (c'est facile à vérifier sur l'éditeur JOSM)
zors1843 (2014-11-23 07:34:27+00:00): liefst geen persoonlijke informatie mappen
trigpoint (2014-11-22 17:44:36+00:00): Is this verifiable , i.e. if i walk down the street will i see an office i can call at and a sign?
Samantha sings (2014-11-22 18:44:46+00:00): No this is a working from home business office.
trigpoint (2014-11-22 21:24:10+00:00): Openstreetmap is a map, not a business directory. Businesses such as this have no place in Openstreetmap.
You are welcome to draw your house, in the correct place, and add proper address details to it.
You can then use umap, https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ to display a map on your website if you wish.
zors1843 (2014-11-23 07:36:44+00:00): een knooppunt met enkel een name tag is ongebruikelijk - als het persoonlijke informatie is past het niet in de gegevensbank
chillly (2014-11-22 18:00:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
I'm not quite sure what you were trying to do with the area for Upper Longdon. If you want to draw the outline of the residential area of the place, you need to draw it much more accurately to the outside of the residential area (gardens typically) and mark it as landuse=residential.
defjam (2014-11-22 18:03:18+00:00): Thanks for the Help -- I just did a reverse geocode for the for my house address and it said I was in "chase terrace". I assumed (you know where that can get you) that this was because the are had not been mapped. How could I edit the reverese geocode data to correctly return the address as Upper Longdon and not Chase Terrace?
chillly (2014-11-22 18:14:25+00:00): You could add the outline of your house and add the full address details (the online editor has an address box to help). Reverse geocoding works best with great data, so full address data helps a lot. We need lots of addresses adding, so any you can add will help. Would you like your area removed or do you want to do that?
defjam (2014-11-22 18:20:39+00:00): Really appreciate your help on this. I would be grateful if you could remove it. I will add the full address for my house and the ones I know that are around me. Is there a way of ensuring the area that is returned during a reverse geocode is generally marked as "Upper Longdon, Rugeley" (which is the correct postal address) rather than "Chase Terrace, Lichfield" ?
chillly (2014-11-22 18:31:12+00:00): Any data you add gets incorporated into the process that returns what you want, though it can take time to get processed. How are you requesting the reverse geocode?
defjam (2014-11-22 18:40:50+00:00): Since I edited the map, I am now getting back a house number (win!). Unfortunately it is still saying Chase Terrace -- I am making an XHR request in javascript
CODE:
var x1 = 'http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/reverse?format=json&lat=52.72911071777344&lon=-1.9102120399475098';
chillly (2014-11-22 18:50:50+00:00): The city name should be Upper Longdon - I know it's not a city :-). If you are expecting a postal address, that's not likely. OSM is a geo database and doesn't use postal towns (RM's otherwise misleading invention)
chillly (2014-11-22 18:53:08+00:00): More geocoding (& reverse) on IRC. see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC
defjam (2014-11-22 19:01:39+00:00): Thanks for this. On your recent comment about the city, the query above returns:
{"house_number":"30","road":"Upper Way","suburb":"Chase Terrace","city":"Lichfield","county":"Staffordshire","state_district":"West Midlands","state":"England","postcode":"WS151QA","country":"United Kingdom","country_code":"gb"}

The suburb should be "Upper Longdon" and the city should be "Rugeley"

But no matter what I edit, I can't change the data to return Upper Longdon and Rugeley for the general area OR for the specific addresses I have edited.
chillly (2014-11-22 19:04:23+00:00): Discuss it on IRC - many knowledgeable people there, possibly including the Nominatim author.
kamicut (2014-11-22 18:00:08+00:00): You should add a comment to your commit message, next time.
~Jhellico (2014-11-23 14:04:10+00:00): Просьба не ломать административные границы!
emacsen (2014-11-22 20:45:30+00:00): Reverted in changeset 26960270
Nakaner (2015-05-25 10:28:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111542323/history is not main, it is a siding track. That's why usage=* is wrong and service=siding has to be tagged. I fixed it.
itineris (2019-12-03 13:24:52+00:00): Szia!

Biztos, hogy ezt a szervizutat is így hívják, mint a másik irányba levő vasútállomást?

Üdv:
Ákos
ViriatoLusitano (2014-11-23 13:21:12+00:00): Olá João, obrigado pela contribuição!

Reparo que adicionas-te um ponto no mapa para notificar que existe uma rotunda aí.

A melhor maneira para outros utilizadores saberem disto é através da ferramenta de "reportar um erro no mapa" que está no menu à direita.

Outra maneira, mais trabalhosa (mas mais divertida), é tu mesmo mapeares a rotunda no mapa! É só clicar no botão "Editar" que fica no topo da página.

Procura por outras rotundas na zona para teres uma ideia de como as mapear. 

Qualquer dúvida que tenhas não hesites em mandar uma mensagem.

Bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap!
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-29 00:53:23+00:00): Twój zestaw zmian został wycofany: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30601483 
Proszę w przyszłości mapować uważniej.
eggie (2018-06-15 17:54:25+00:00): Dag HenkKoel.. De tag hospital heb ik hier verwijderd en vervangen door amenity=doctors. Alle info staat nu op de adresnode.
Het geeft anders verwarring bij gebruikers.
kayle (2014-11-26 10:16:23+00:00): ahoj, vitaj v OSM. Na úvod malá prosba. Neuploaduj, prosím ťa, to čo zobrazí kapor plugin tak ako je do databázy.
akram alhadad (2014-11-22 22:46:42+00:00): sahar
akram alhadad (2014-11-22 22:47:32+00:00): 737314325 سحر عبدالله اليمن عدن دار سعد
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-24 16:48:03+00:00): Proszę dokładniej rysować budynki.
ToniE (2014-12-09 10:18:16+00:00): Hallo Carl,

es sieht so aus, als wenn hier zuviel "Brücke" ist.

Ich glaube, da ist nur direkt südlich der Bäckermühle eine Brücke, oder?

Viele Grüße,
Toni
zarl (2014-12-09 11:06:17+00:00): Guter Tipp, diese riesige Brückenkonstruktion habe ich glatt übersehen (oder hab ich das etwa so eingetragen...?). Habs jetzt sinnvoller eingetragen, und auch das Gebäude Bäckermühle reduziert und zusätzlich ein Wehr eingetragen.

Viele Grüsse,
Zarl
Klumbumbus (2016-11-27 21:13:46+00:00): Laut https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/775361 Nummer 20. Kennst du dich aus? Die Frage ist, zu welcher Straße es gehört. Uhlasnd oder Mozart. Logisch möglich wäre beides.
VG
is-zUser (2016-11-27 22:12:52+00:00): Gehört zur Mozartstr. und ist die 20. War dort erst vor kurzem. Man kanns prüfen: http://80.148.13.213/
Ich ändere das. Besten Dank! VG
Klumbumbus (2016-11-27 22:19:50+00:00): Danke. Das Zwickau GIS ist aber als Quelle für OSM sicher nicht zgelassen, oder gibt es eine Sondergenehmigung?
is-zUser (2016-11-27 23:34:19+00:00): Richtig, als Quelle geht nicht. Deshalb benutze ich auch handschriftliche Aufzeichnungen oder Keypad-Mapper wenn ich unterwegs bin.
trial (2019-11-08 18:13:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257750571/history is not exactly in São Salvador. More over I'm not sure what you wanted to fix but I see oneway=yes;no!
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/NW7
mdk (2019-11-08 18:33:18+00:00): If you look into the history, you will see that user "mitilio" changed the value from oneway=yes to oneway=no;yes.
It looks like mitilio merge two ways (one with oneway=no, the other with with oneway=yes). The ID-Editor put both values together.
trial (2019-11-08 18:42:04+00:00): Yes you're right, I misread the history.
JOSM may make the same error. But you solve explicitly the conflict. Not sure for iD. If implicitly then we should create a ticket for that.
AgusQui (2014-12-19 00:03:34+00:00): Cuando dibujes calles nuevas acordate de unirla con todas las calles a la que intersecta con un nodo, sino no funciona el ruteo, saludos
multimodaal (2020-10-12 17:59:01+00:00): Hoi Sebastic, ik wilde jou als onze "grensbewaker " even advies vragen aan jou over het volgende:

"Wageningen-Hoog" heeft nu geen aparte boundary of place in OSM, maar wordt algemeen wel gezien als een kern, zie bijvoorbeeld: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wageningen-Hoog

*Welke afbakening / place zou gepast zijn voor Wageningen-Hoog ?

De situatie is :
-Het is geen aparte woonplaats in de BAG (grens BAG-woonplaats Wageningen = gemeentegrens)
- Wageningen-Hoog is wel een aparte CBS-Wijk 

-On the ground: als je vanaf de N781 de Hollandse Weg richting O rijdt , dan kom je na ca 150m een RVV-bord H2 Einde bebouwde kom "Wageningen" tegen 

Na ca 700 meter komt je bij de Zoomweg een bord H1 begin Bebouwde kom "Wageningen-Hoog" tegen
(zie ook GSV en foto in bovenstaande wikipedia-link) 

De situatie op de grond komt komt dus voor Wageningen-Hoog  meer overeen met de bebouwde kom zoals in artikel 20a van de Wegenverkeerswet (die door de gemeenteraad wordt vastgesteld) dan met BAG-woonplaats

-Spraakgebruik: ook locals gebruiken Wageningen-Hoog als aparte woonplaats/kern. Aanleiding van deze vraag iemand die vertelde "mijn ouders zijn [ vanuit een andere provincie]   verhuisd naar Wageningen-Hoog", en dat kon ik niet vinden in OSM (-;

Ik heb voor nu even snel een landuse=residential gemaakt (die was er ook niet) om het wel in de database te hebben, maar niet aan grenzen te rommelen

Wat denk jij, is een  admin_level=10 op z'n plek voor Wageningen-Hoog of zie je een andere oplossing die recht doet aan het duidelijk afgebakende karakter van Wageningen-Hoog tov Wageningen als aparte bebouwde kom / kern?

Als admin_level=10 niet past dan misschien wel een aparte place=village -polygoon? 

Ben benieuwd naar jouw beeld, en pas ook gerust eea naar bestaand gebruik als je dat wilt.Thx!