piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archpdx (2021-10-14 04:00:37+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate you adding missing houses in this area. The building outline should match the imagery. Can you redo these? Also, you can square the building by just selecting the outline then just type a "q"
maraf24 (2021-10-13 17:17:37+00:00): Wycofane.
salvoconducto (2021-10-13 16:56:10+00:00): If you encounter bad buildings nearby please delete them. Viz: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111840201
archpdx (2021-10-14 04:00:44+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate you adding missing houses in this area. The building outline should match the imagery. Can you redo these? Also, you can square the building by just selecting the outline then just type a "q"
Frans S (2021-10-14 10:47:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are below the quality standards of HOTOSM. 
Please pay attention on these points:
Map accurate and do not include a yard or other buildings in 1 mappings.
Square each building.
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112470810
bhousel (2021-10-13 17:11:12+00:00): May I ask what you're up to?  The hashtags on your changeset don't match HOT task 3319, which is about mapping buildings in Tanzania.  Did something weird happened when you saved your work? Thanks!
archpdx (2021-10-14 04:00:51+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate you adding missing houses in this area. The building outline should match the imagery. Can you redo these? Also, you can square the building by just selecting the outline then just type a "q"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
arvdk (2021-10-13 20:31:38+00:00): Please keep your changeset area limited!
Besides, your description is could use some elaboration and is only covering one of your edits.
opendcc (2021-10-14 05:49:54+00:00): Sorry, the large changeset area was unintential.
mike140 (2021-10-14 12:35:27+00:00): не все здания прямоугольной формы: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/209632016
slayzex (2021-10-14 20:03:16+00:00): Точнее, не только лишь все, а мало какие здания прямоугольной формы.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112471843
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:30:13+00:00): #TIP: The juice store should likely be inside of the building. It appears the building is offset. You can either move the building to the imagery or just move the shop inside of the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112472277
joegolden (2021-10-15 17:13:37+00:00): Thanks for the tip! Updated the building to align with the imagery.
perusluku (2021-10-14 06:21:02+00:00): use_sidepathia ei kai saisi käyttää samaan aikaan cycleway=lane kanssa, nyt merkattu Hämeentien pohjoispäähän etelän suuntaan?
Petri Lintunen (2021-10-14 06:36:14+00:00): Terve, hyvä huomio. Tuon korjaus jäikin ehkä vielä vähän kesken. Haasteena tuossa on osaltaan (myös) se kun osittain siinä on erillinen pöyrätie, mutta välillä se tulee ajoradan (bussikaista) reunaan. Onko ideaa miten tämä on viisainta laittaa?
Petri Lintunen (2021-10-14 06:43:18+00:00): Otin nuo sidepath merkinnät pois pohjoispäästä. Koitan käydä uudelleenfillaroimassa tuolla lähiaikoina niin saisi tarkennettua määrityksiä.
Petri Lintunen (2021-10-14 06:50:11+00:00): Hei, voitko tsekata Intiankatu, menikö se oikein? Allastien ja Koskelantien välillä siinä on kaakkoonpäin tien varressa kevyenliikenteenväylä, mutta luoteeseenpäin tien oikeassa reunassa pyöräkaista.
perusluku (2021-10-14 07:00:48+00:00): muistaakseni(?) länsipuolen pyöräväylä menee Kinaporinkatu-Kurvi välin samassa tasossa ajoradan kanssa, eli kuvittelisin sen olevan ehkä reitityksen kannalta ok nykyisellään? kun katson etelään Hämeentietä niin ilmeisesti vain kolmitasoratkaisut on merkitty omana erillisenä väylällään. en ole siis ihan varma, pitäisi lukea tuota wikiä taas :)
perusluku (2021-10-14 07:14:59+00:00): tsekkasin Intiankadun, mun silmiin näyttää oikealta! löysin tällaisen tagin kuin bicycle:backward=use_sidepath, jonka käyttöä voisi tutkia Intiankadun ajoradalla, en aikaisemmin tiennyt moisen olemassaolosta
Dawid2849 (2021-10-13 19:59:40+00:00): Czemu usunąłeś nazwę w ulicy w Krzeszowie? Ja wiem, że tam trudno jest ocenić nazwę ulicy, ale jakąś nazwę musi mieć ;)
Dawid2849 (2021-10-13 19:59:54+00:00): *nazwę ulicy
Zbigniew_Cz (2021-10-13 20:44:26+00:00): Po pierwsze - nigdzie nie jest powiedziane, że każdy kawałek drogi musi mieć nazwę. W niektórych miejscach na świecie tak jest, w Polsce nie.
Po drugie i odnosząc się do tego przedmiotowego kawałka - na pewno nie jest to ulica Kościelna. Kościelna kończy się na skrzyżowaniu Biłgorajskiej i Sieniawskiej. Tam na razie trudno powiedzieć jaka nazwa będzie. Może Rynek, może Tarnogrodzka, a może Mostowa ;-)
Dawid2849 (2021-10-13 21:21:11+00:00): hm... wg e-mapy ul. Kościelna kończy się na skrzyżowaniu DW863 z powiatówką na Biłgoraj (którego już nie ma) i tym się zasugerowałem, ale nie wiem sam nie jestem co do tego przekonany... W sumie to głupia nazwa tak krótkiego fragmentu drogi nie jest aż tak ważna w tym momencie, pewnie wszystko się okaże gdy przebudowa skrzyżowania się zakończy :)
Dawid2849 (2021-10-13 21:22:06+00:00): a i dzięki za dosyć szybką odpowiedź, po Twojej ostatniej aktywności na OSM nie spodziewałem się tak szybkiej odpowiedzi :P
Zbigniew_Cz (2021-10-13 21:23:34+00:00): Otóż to. Pozmienia się zapewne, a rondo dostanie nazwę "Rondo im. Jana Pawła II" ;-)
Kovoschiz (2021-10-14 03:45:19+00:00): `traffic_signals:turn=` means the arrow displayed, not what movement it applies to. You can't use it like this.
Kovoschiz (2021-10-14 03:57:37+00:00): Don't mix up the syntax of `*:conditional=` and `parking:condition` in `parking:lane=` (older ). There has been a proposal trying to fix this.
HolloWorld (2021-10-14 05:10:24+00:00): there is no better way to show how seperated traffic signal stop line on same road, the wiki page also said it should be tagged this and add note, imo there are 2 signal very near, should can be represented what it is when needed to change tag.
HolloWorld (2021-10-14 05:17:17+00:00): after check taginfo, i think we should have a discussion on how those road side stopping sign to be tagged before adding more. at the time i suggest 'parking:condition:left=no_stopping'+'parking:condition:left:time_interval=bruh' or any other comments ?
Frans S (2021-10-14 10:35:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 
Your mappings ar far below the quality standards HOTOSM stands for. I'm goint to revert the most bad mappings because it cost more time to correct them rather than map them all over again.
Please pay attention on these points:
Just map the building accurate. not the yard or green around it. 
Map each building individually.
Square each building with the Q key
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112473329
Yarik32 (2021-10-13 18:13:25+00:00): Та ну йо ма йо, жосм все наплутав та намагався закрити уже закритий порожній набір змін.
Опис: Уточнив класифікацію доріг, додав будинки по Шевченка вулиці в Нічогівці
Фонове зображення: Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)
Yarik32 (2021-10-13 18:15:57+00:00): (*із зіпсованим настроєм та ювілейним 200-им набором змін, він пішов розбиратися із кав'ярнею, в якій продають напівфабрикати*)
aceman444 (2025-10-20 16:41:40+00:00): Zdravim, tak potom je to access=private. Hodnota 'permit' znamena, ze si treba vyziadat povolenie, ale dostane ho v principe kazdy.
aceman444 (2025-10-20 16:42:32+00:00): A ked ste dali 'access', tak to pokryva vsetky sposoby dopravy, netreba este vymenovavat aj dalsich par nahodnych a dat im rovnaku hodnotu.
Mordechai23 (2021-10-13 23:29:09+00:00): to jest do zupełnego wyrzucenia, dopiero co jest przetarg na projektowanie części tej drogi - jak narysują to wtedy będzie można dodać
maro21 (2021-10-14 19:49:40+00:00): to usunąłem
salvoconducto (2021-10-13 18:33:06+00:00): Thanks for retagging a broken relation. Do you autovalidator guys really don't care?
MapSpot (2021-10-13 18:43:32+00:00): I apologize if I left certain issues unattended. I use the iD editor and would rather not mess with complex broken relations I do not feel qualified to fix.

Aside from standardizing tags with adjacent water features, I also remove duplicate name tags when one is already present on a waterway, extend waterways through river areas when one is not already present, add intermittent tags when rivers appear to be primarily dry, etc.

Thank you for letting me know about this, and I will add Fix Me requests if I encounter further issues of this particular nature.
salvoconducto (2021-10-13 18:47:44+00:00): >I use the iD editor
I would recommend JOSM, this can further increase your mapping efficiency.
>"add Fix Me requests"
Please not!
MapSpot (2021-10-13 18:53:03+00:00): >"Please not!" 
Haha, noted.

And I hope to start using JOSM soon once I acquire better hardware to run it. The steep learning curve is daunting, but it'll really help with adding and fixing relations.
Supaplex (2021-10-14 03:03:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682247656
this is a road in the  retarding basin area, why do you change it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112474482
VLD071 (2021-10-14 14:24:03+00:00): Supaplex, 
Thank you for your guidance, I have updated the classification back to service.
Ryan
kapazao (2021-10-14 14:40:17+00:00): ¿Por qué un multipolígono para esto y no hacer simplemente un área residencial que englobe la zona?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112474626
Pipeton (2021-10-14 15:06:41+00:00): Porque los polígonos ya estaban creados y no estoy seguro de que las zonas intermedias pertenezcan también a la zona. Aunque no importa mucho, lo puedo cambiar si es mejor un solo polígono.
davidearl (2021-10-21 14:11:57+00:00): FYI I am going to add back 'porters' to entrance here as without it the porters lodge disappears from the University Map (https://map.cam.ac.uk)
Alivelo (2021-10-13 19:35:54+00:00): Die Suma-Wasserbetten existieren nicht mehr. Derzeit befindet sich das Objekt in der Vermierung. Sobald die anderen Räume belegt sind werde ich das Gebäude vervollständigen.
Henosb (2021-10-15 16:45:05+00:00): Source = OSM Data
Henosb (2021-10-18 16:14:27+00:00): OSM
DaveF (2021-10-13 23:25:32+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass in not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.
phd0 (2021-10-14 06:04:31+00:00): hello, I am only using the ID auto-correction to complete an error box. And when I remove the "grass" elements from a "green" for example, it automatically puts them back to me. test it to see / understand if you want. 
Regards
phd0 (2021-10-14 06:07:51+00:00): I also completed the finish holes, and corrected some departures marked "green"
phd0 (2021-10-14 06:17:42+00:00): and please for next time : wait for réponse before back all changes ... 
(even though I sometimes make mistakes)
DaveF (2021-10-14 10:44:24+00:00): Hi
iD's validator is incorrect. 
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347

iD doesn't "automatically puts them back". It is a suggestion, which can, and should, be ignored.

Unsure what you mean in your second comment.

I didn't reverse your changeset, I swapped one tag for another. Any other edits remain.
phd0 (2021-10-14 11:01:24+00:00): So it's you DaveF63 ?
well, i didnt know about this ID auto-setting / suggestion error. 
suggestion is realy a good tools help me to update quickly. 

I therefore encourage you to persevere in this bug correction, but given the number of golf courses I have done around the world, there is a big correction to be made after the bug has been fixed.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.06048/-87.78537 for other example

sorry for my english, i'm french.
DaveF (2021-10-14 11:45:44+00:00): Hi
It's disappointing how widespread this error by iD's developers has spread, & it will take a lot of effort to sort out.

Your English is much better than my French.
Lionhearth (2021-10-15 18:59:44+00:00): Hola Ubicando la estructura! de la Escuela por favor no la reubique o la borre gracias
sanch3z (2021-10-13 19:32:26+00:00): This changeset updates some building geometry. I accidentially submitted an earlier changeset description.
gscscnd (2021-10-14 08:37:43+00:00): A dlaczego nie tertiary_link?
Olga | Yanosik (2021-10-14 11:01:39+00:00): Racja, powinien być secondary_link, żeby silniki nawigacyjne preferowały łącznicę. Tertiary_link jest niżej oceniany niż tertiary w nawigacjach.
gscscnd (2021-10-14 11:32:08+00:00): Chodziło mi o zmianę tagu łącznicy z tertiary_link na tertiary, co raczej było błędne. secondary_link może być.
Ser9ei (2021-10-14 08:44:38+00:00): С откатом не согласен. Свою позицию автору отката разъяснил в чате. Помимо спорного куска дороги, был откачен весь пакет с улучшениями смещения и геометрии здания и прилегающих проходов и дорог.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-24 11:35:16+00:00): Hello,
This changeset adds a role "main" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41609696 within https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1581577 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1959386 - I was wondering what that meant?
Best Regards,
Andy
conifermapper (2021-11-16 18:51:48+00:00): 'Main' means it is the main path of the route
SomeoneElse (2021-11-16 18:59:53+00:00): Thanks, but that doesn't make a huge amount of sense - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1581577 is just in one piece (there are no alternative routes)  and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1959386 is itself an alternative to the parts of E9 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1254604 in France such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2167510 ?
conifermapper (2021-11-16 19:02:18+00:00): Ok, perhaps it would be best to remove the 'main' role - I was only trying to add some detail to relations
SomeoneElse (2021-11-26 00:04:15+00:00): Thanks - done.
Warin61 (2026-04-10 05:28:51+00:00): Hi
Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.57803&lat=-40.37762&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Both of these are yours.
opendcc (2021-10-14 05:43:45+00:00): Hat die Brücke dann auch 12to?
rarad74 (2021-10-14 18:32:22+00:00): Salut. Vezi ca ai dezactivat tot multipoligonul farmland de la sud-vest de Ploiesti. Daca nu stii exact cum se lucreaza cu multipoligoane, roaga pe altcineva care stie sa le faca. Sunt greu de reparat dupa ce se mai fac si alte editari peste ele. Acum totul este randat alb. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112478252#map=13/44.8365/25.8465
Dan 9 (2021-10-14 18:39:02+00:00): Salut! Am vazut, am incercat rapid sa il rezolv, dar nu am avut timp. Nu stiu exact ce este gresit de nu functioneaza, poate este un bug. Am sa incerc sa ii dau de cap, revert, ceva
rarad74 (2021-10-14 19:31:33+00:00): Nu e bug. Se intampla destul de des sa strice multipoligoanele cate cineva si el anaibii de greu. De fapt sunt relatii. Ai intersectat un poligon cu rol de inner cu o margine a poligonului mare - Outer sau ai sters o parte din multipoligon. Asta e cel mai probabil sa se fi intamplat, dar nici eu nu stiu unde. Am incercat sa dau revert la editarea cea mai mare dar deja apar conflicte pentru ca au mai editat si altii dupa tine.
rarad74 (2021-10-15 16:17:06+00:00): S-a rezolvat. A fost o problema de self intersection. Ai tras probabil de un colt de poligon intern si l-au suprapus peste ala extern si s-a dezactivat.  Poti sa vezi greselile cu utilitarul asta.  https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=25.83406&lat=44.86890&zoom=10
Josef73 (2024-02-07 18:22:18+00:00): Guten Tag, wie lange hat das Hundeheim offen am Mittwoch und Samstag?
Johannes Stoelp (2024-02-07 20:24:51+00:00): Ich erfrage nochmal die letzten Oeffnungszeiten und mache dann ein Update.
Murcik (2022-04-26 08:15:23+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=860692#p860692
Prusaker (2022-04-26 08:48:38+00:00): Прошёлся по всему списку, поправил теги.
MxxCon (2021-10-13 22:48:29+00:00): Hello.
When mapping sidewalks as separate paths, please don't forget to add "sidewalk:left/right/both=separate" tags to corresponding roads as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112478755
IanVG (2021-10-20 02:05:27+00:00): Thanks MxxCon for the feedback. Not to get nit-picky about this, but I was under the distinct impression that one "may" use the sidewalk tag on the associated highway a separate sidewalk was mapped along. (reading from the wiki page). In other words, it doesn't seem I am under obligation to map the sidewalk on the roads. Also, is sidewalk:both=separate the preferred method for mapping sidewalks? It has around 2,500 uses compared to sidewalk=separate which has around 125,000 uses. I'll be happy to use the :both one if there is an advantage to it.
MxxCon (2021-10-20 02:42:08+00:00): Nobody is under any obligation to do anything. 😉 It's just if the associated streets don't have "separate", then somebody might come along as tag "yes", then consumers of OSM data might incorrectly interpret like there are twice as many sidewalks. Or if they render sidewalks on their own based on tags, such a map might also have twice as many..
Regarding which style of tag to use, ":both" is a more modern way to tagging. On the taginfo site if you take a look at Chronology tab, you'll see how quickly each tag gains popularity.
IanVG (2021-11-02 14:34:33+00:00): Hi MxxCon, thanks for the response :)! I think you explained it really well; I appreciate the patience and thought of your message. I'll use the sidewalk:both=separate tags from now on! And thanks for the insight into  the chronology tab, I'll take a look at that next time. Best, IanVG
iandees (2021-10-14 02:03:44+00:00): Please don't delete and re-draw features. It's not polite to remove other people's work and replace it with your own.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112478778
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-17 23:06:52+00:00): does this bridge exist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992559492
FormerKaartographer (2022-11-17 23:33:18+00:00): Hi erickdeoliveiraleal,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I think when adding this I was referencing Mapbox. However, based on other satellite imagery, it appears to be a ford if there is a crossing at all. Please feel free to make any changes you deem necessary.
Lee Carré (2021-10-14 08:14:19+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

A URL alone is meaningless.

“Contradictory and unnecessary information - bridge or tunnel tag has value =no”

Your boundary box includes jurisdictions where no such changes were made. Please make smaller changeset areas in future: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
salvoconducto (2021-10-13 20:59:53+00:00): If you see school nodes like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4227626890 may you please be so kind to extend them to an area?
FormerKaartographer (2021-10-14 14:50:51+00:00): Thank you for reaching out with the suggestion. I am currently focused on adding missing roads throughout this region. I have not worked with areas extensively and need to continue with my project adding missing roads.
jonrellim (2021-10-13 21:03:11+00:00): ... meadow naar grass omdat het gaat om vlakken openbaar groen wat duidelijk niet bedoeld is om beesten in te laten grazen (Landuse=Meadow: Used to tag an area of land primarily vegetated by grass plus other non-woody plants, mainly used for hay (meadow) or for grazing animals (pasture). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow)
GinaroZ (2021-10-14 08:37:42+00:00): Hi, if there are two house numbers here you'd be better adding two nodes with the separate address details.
salvoconducto (2021-10-13 21:08:24+00:00): Stop the hilarious changeset comments, please.
Pt873 (2021-10-13 21:45:01+00:00): Olá. Essa região está em obras e o traçado está sendo alterado.
TomCerts (2021-10-14 23:25:54+00:00): Hello Pt873,

Thank you for the context. Do you know if that u-turn lane will be available after construction? If so, a 'highway=construction’ segment may be appropriate (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction).

Thank you,
TomCerts

Olá Pt873,

Obrigado pelo contexto. Você sabe se essa faixa de retorno estará disponível após a construção? Nesse caso, um segmento 'highway = construction' pode ser apropriado (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction).

Obrigado,
TomCerts
Pt873 (2021-10-15 15:08:35+00:00): Não, após a finalização dos serviços esses retornos serão fechados. Abraços!
Wilmer Osario (2021-10-19 09:50:30+00:00): Please do not remove the name of the ramps, called "distribuidores", because those are the official and colloquial names that are given to these types of roads in Venezuela. Their names are very important in road navigation in this country.
VigotheCarpathian (2021-10-19 17:15:13+00:00): See changeset: 112667609 for details.
Lee Carré (2021-10-14 08:16:11+00:00): See comments of http://www.osm.org/changeset/112478786
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:38:19+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112479886
ahmed aslan (2021-10-13 23:27:02+00:00): احسنت يانجيب
DeFra85 (2021-11-12 23:02:38+00:00): Hey, die Baustelle für die neuen Starkstrommasten hatte ich extra weggelassen und das Buschland durchgezogen, da die Masten schon bereits seit Mitte 2020 stehen, die Leitungen Anfang des Jahres durchgezogen wurden, die Trasse mittlerweile in Betrieb ist und die alten auch schon abgerissen sind.