piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gendy54 (2025-02-01 22:32:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Je tombe sur ce changeset pour ajouter les voies BAN.
En gros, l'intégration des adresses faite n'est pas correct car il ne reste pas les schémas de donnée. Soit en noeud, soit en relation. On en a aucun des 2. Donc la donnée importée ne sert à rien et ne peut pas être utilisée. Il faut tout supprimer et recommencer.
CartoLot (2025-02-01 22:52:09+00:00): Bonjour, 
Je n'ai pas le temps de me poser sur un changement aussi conséquent pour le moment, je vous invite donc à le corriger par vous même car celui-ci apparaît certes comme une erreur mais est utilisable et utilisé dans des logiciels tels qu'Organic Map.
Vil4ckc (2022-10-20 14:56:27+00:00): Будь ласка неробіть по одній зміні в наборі змін
user_5359 (2022-10-24 14:27:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between name and  description
* "name"="driveway" we use highway=service & service=driveway
*"name"="house" we use building=house
OpenStreetBoy (2022-10-21 17:04:51+00:00): Hi OSM_RogerWilco, cycleway:right=separate & cycleway=right macht für mich hier keinen Sinn, da es ja bereits einen straßenbegleitenden Weg gibt. Über die Sinnhaftigkeit von bicycle=use_sidepath / foot=use_sidepath ließe sich ebenfalls streiten :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127838736
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-10-21 17:16:31+00:00): Moin OpenStreetBoy,

cycleway:right=separate & cycleway=right besagt, dass sich rechts der Straße ein Radweg befindet, der als separate Linie erfasst wurde. Man könnte auch nur cycleway=separate taggen, aber ich bin inzwischen dazu umgestiegen die Seite mit anzugeben. So ist klar, dass auf der linken Seite kein Radweg ist.

Was soll denn an *=use_sidepath strittig sein? Der Tag besagt, dass es eine Benutzungspflicht gibt, den Geh- und Radweg (Zeichen 240) zu benutzen, der als separate Linie erfasst wurde.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OpenStreetBoy (2022-10-21 20:06:47+00:00): Lt OSM-Wiki kann man cycleway=separate am HW setzen (lt Taginfo ~11k verwendet), um deutlich zu machen, das es neben dem Hauptweg einen separaten Radweg. Dieses wiederum sollte/kann wegfallen, wenn zusätzlich bicycle=use_sidepath gesetzt wird:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Acycleway%3Dseparate sowie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-10-22 18:30:50+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das war mir neu. Wobei die entsprechenden Textpassagen auch recht frisch sind. Und das Wiki sagt an anderer Stelle wieder etwas anderes. Ich mache mir da noch ein paar Gedanken.

Letztendlich sind es aber keine Fehler, sondern höchstens Redundanzen. Oder was stört Dich genau daran?
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-10-22 18:37:23+00:00): cycleway[:right/left/both]=separate wird übrigens auch von StreetComplete so  getaggt, wenn man bei der Frage, ob die Straße in Radweg besitzt "separat auf Karte eingezeichnet" auswählt. Von daher werden diese Tags wahrscheinlich irgendwann wieder hinzugefügt werden, wenn wir sie jetzt löschen.
maraf24 (2022-11-25 23:06:29+00:00): Proszę o zaprzestanie dodawania do każdej drogi na terenie osiedla/szkoły access=private.
To jest zgadywanie i w wielu przypadkach nieprawda.
Teraz routing pieszy nie działa prawidłowo w wielu miejscach miasta.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-20 13:20:28+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=41.379474%2C-79.813352%2C15.39
wireguy (2023-01-19 12:27:59+00:00): Stretch, can you look at
way 1088297041 and
relation 14487828
Relation seems to be broken, and way not part of route.
Stretch Longfellow (2023-01-20 14:36:57+00:00): I think I fixed it; let me know if that didn't work. There were some construction edits in that area recently so I'm not entirely sure what went wrong.
phoenixsaigon1698 (2024-04-13 06:05:37+00:00): Hi bạn trong changeset này vì sao bạn thay maxweight thành maxweightrating:hgv thế
zstadler (2024-05-08 16:43:24+00:00): Hello geogidon,

Please note that "planned" is not a standard term in OSM. Elements usually are tagged as "proposed" until construction starts and then the are tagged with "construction".

Best regards,
Zeev
starsep (2022-10-20 14:31:06+00:00): Zmiana została wycofana w https://osm.org/changeset/127842443

Aleje Jerozolimskie zostały przesunięte na budynki. Ta mapa to nie zabawka.
Proszę o dawanie poprawnych opisów zmian.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
eggie (2022-10-20 14:53:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Elk begin is moeilijk.. Je hebt het fietspad vastgeplakt aan de landuse=forest
Hier kun je dat zien.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127841107

Wanneer je de PDOK actueel als achtergrond zou zetten kun je precies zien hoe de fietsenstalling ligt. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-20 15:21:51+00:00): Het fietspad heb ik weer losgemaakt en de fietsverhuur uitgelijnd volgens de bgt data.
Fietsenstalling en voetgangersgebied beginnetjes gemaakt met aanpassing naar de actualiteit

MVG
eggie
rskedgell (2023-01-11 08:51:54+00:00): Correct name (Pussy Lane) restored by another user in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128547975

Could you explain how Bing was your source for this edit?
SomeoneElse (2023-01-11 10:21:17+00:00): One more thing VLD271,
Can you explain where this series of edits (and the methodology behind it) was discussed with the local community as required by the OEG?
Best Regards,
Andy
VLD082 (2023-01-11 16:48:01+00:00): rskedgell,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. In reference to the imagery used, we use street level imagery to confirm street names. In this instance our editor incorrectly adjusted the footway's name to that of a nearby road. Our editor has been informed of the incorrect edit and will be more thorough during research going forward.
VLD082 (2023-01-11 16:56:45+00:00): SomeoneElse, 
The project has been listed here <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Facebook#:~:text=%2C%20OSMCha)-,Profanity%20Cleanup,-This%20project%20uses> 
in accordance with the OEG. The methodology looks at nearby objects that exist on the map, history present on the object itself, an individual’s previous edits and many other sources through human review to try and make the best possible version of OSM available. As we are all human though, we welcome the feedback to improve our edits in the future.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-13 08:10:51+00:00): The OEG has an "Informing the community" section - where did the post about the "Profanity cleaning" activity go?
rskedgell (2023-01-13 08:22:25+00:00): A list of the words, which might be slightly rude in some contexts, which have been deemed "profanities" would be helpful.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-21 12:06:11+00:00): Re https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta#Profanity_Cleanup - actually, the user performing this edit seems to be missing from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Meta#Mapping_Team Is it definitely someone from Facebook?
RVR004 (2023-01-24 06:39:17+00:00): Hi Andy,

Thank you for the discussion above!  The global data clean up was described with more details in this diary. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Yunzhi/diary. Our team has also been actively communicating with communities via changeset comments, and respecting feedback and comments from local communities.

Best regards,
Yunzhi
MxxCon (2022-10-21 18:51:49+00:00): Almost 2000 changes spread over multiple states and countries..makes it impossible to review and seems to be automated edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127841287
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-10-21 19:05:23+00:00): Yes automated edit to follow the new approved wiki page on crossing:markings and uncontrolled/unmarked crossings. Should be fine though. Did it trigger an error or something?
MxxCon (2022-10-21 19:35:45+00:00): Well, such a huge changeset makes it very difficult to spot any potential errors.. :/
It would've been much better if you'd at least split it up into smaller geographic regions.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-10-21 21:01:31+00:00): Yes I know, sorry. This is the change that has been made:
change [crossing=uncontrolled] with [crossing:markings=no] to [crossing=unmarked] (removed crossing:markings)
Sam Verstraete (2022-10-23 19:12:01+00:00): Met welke reden hebt u deze weg verwijderd? Ik heb dit vandaag gecontroleerd en de weg is er nog...
Dimitar155 (2022-10-20 14:23:59+00:00): Hello rhhsmits,

Why did you remove the crossing? As far as I remember it was still there as of last week.
rhhs (2022-10-20 14:36:53+00:00): Half an hour ago it wasn't there any more: pedestrian traffic lights are gone, and markings on the asphalt removed
Dimitar155 (2022-10-20 16:20:47+00:00): In such case it is better to add was: prefix to it's tags, possibly with a note. Otherwise it might get added by another mapper because it is still visible on satellite imagery.
rhhs (2022-10-20 17:28:48+00:00): OK. Or I'll describe my change better, I should have added "no longer exists"
map per (2023-01-04 14:41:47+00:00): Hallo Landratsamt Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen - UNB,

was bedeutet das "(TÖL-WOR)" im Namen des Schutzgebietes (1)? Ich weiß nicht was das bedeuten soll aber das sollte vermutlich nicht als name=*, sondern eher e.v. als ref=* eingezeichnet werden.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104936464
Landratsamt Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen - UNB (2023-01-04 15:32:34+00:00): Das Wiesenbrütergebiet LKM besteht eigentlich aus zwei Gebieten. Eines im Landkreis Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen, eines im Landkreis Weilheim-Schongau. Dahinter stehen zwei verschiedene Verordnungen mit unterschiedlichen Betretungsregelungen. Das sollte der Zusatz ausdrücken. An irgendeiner Stelle sollte das erwähnt werden, um die Gebiete unterscheiden zu können. VG
map per (2023-01-04 16:12:31+00:00): Ah, ok, danke, dann ergiebt der Zusatz Sinn
SomeoneElse (2023-07-23 23:02:49+00:00): Thanks for mapping these, but assuming that they are actually square, you can square up these irregular quadrilaterals by pressing "q" in most editors.
user_16720371 (2023-07-24 16:42:44+00:00): Thanks, never knew you could do that, Would save a lot of hassle.
Mevess (2022-10-21 08:12:25+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,
Ces parkings vélo existent-ils sur le terrain ?
N'hésitez pas à passer sur le forum d'OSM France (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/) si vous avez des questions sur le projet ou la contribution.
Bonne cartographie,
NJ
eggie (2022-10-20 15:33:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-20 15:38:57+00:00): Scherp gezien...  Nu routeert het weer naar behoren.
MVG
eggie
Mahdi Nameghi (2022-10-20 16:05:00+00:00): دوست عزیز
لطفا و خواهشا اینقدر خرابکاری نکنید و برای خودتون و ما کار درست نکنید. علاوه بر تغییر تایپ معبر بر اساس مشاهده نیست بر اساس واقعیت باید باشد. از کجا در بابل اینهمه بزرگراه احداث شده!!! لطفا به احترام همشهری های خودتون از این بیشتر نقشه رو خراب نکنید
ممنون و متشکر
Taha6831 (2022-10-20 18:57:24+00:00): عزیز. من به از مدت ها قبل نقشه های این وب سایت رو دنبال کردم. قبلا دو کمربندی غربی و شرقی سابق بابل با درجه بزرگراه بوده و ترسیم بنده هم نبوده. اینکه امروز این دو کمربندی دارای درجه بزرگراه نیستند دلیل بر عدم ارتقاع درجه نیست. در سایر نقشه های آنلاین این خیابان ها با درجه بزرگراه شناخته شده. علاوه بر آن نقشه های شهرداری بابل نمایش دهنده درجه بالای اینها هست. دو کمربندی غربی و شرقی سابق که امروز به عنوان ولیعصر و جانبازان شناخته میشن تکمیل کننده ارتباط شبکه بزرگراهی آمل و قائمشهر به بابلسر هستند که در این نقشه به جای بزرگراه به جاده درجه یک تبدیل شدند. از اونجایی که شما می فرمایید بابل از کی تا حالا اینهمه بزرگراه داره، شهر بابل از اولین شهر های مازندران هست که تبدیل به چند منطقه شهرداری شده و از طبقه شهر هایی بین کلان شهر و شهر معمولی هست. نه در حد کلان شهر و نه در حد یک شهر معمولی مثل فریدون کنار. وجود یک شبکه از بزرگراه ها در چنین شهر هایی امر طبیعی است. از ویژگی های بزرگراه حداقل ۴ خط برای عبور خودرو و وجود یک مانع بین خط رفت و خط برگشت است و همچنین پهنای خیابان زیاد باشد. خیابان های مذکور ویژگی های بالا را داشته، در نقشه های شهر بابل با درجه بزرگراه به ثبت رسیده اند. خیابان های زیادی در شهر های کشور تنها ۲ خط برای عبور خودرو دارند و حتی راه رفت از راه برگشت به وسیله بلوار جدا نشده. اما دارای درجه یک هستند. آیا کمربندی های سابق بابل در حد آن خیابان ها هستند که با آنها در یک سطح قرار دارند؟
این خیابان ها چه در نقشه چاپی و چه در نقشه های آنلاین دیگر وب سایت های مسیریابی درجه ی بزرگراه دارند و نظر شخص من دلیلی بر ارتقاع سطح این خیابان ها نیست
Mahdi Nameghi (2022-10-22 04:27:26+00:00): دوست عزیز
اینکه راهی دو خط باشه یا چهار خط دلیل بر بزرگراه بودنش نیست. میشه لطفا لینک یکی از این نقشه هایی که میفرمایید بذارین تا ما هم مطلع شویم. یا حداقل یه عکس از تابلو این خیابان ها بذارین بفهمیم خود شهرداری چه عنوانی برای این خیابان گذاشته؟
thatoneiowan (2022-11-09 02:23:51+00:00): hello! saw that the Ramp names were removed and was wondering if there was a better way to tag this info. they are posted on the ramps with signage so I would like to have that data included somehow. maybe "ref="? thanks!
kmarkish_lyft (2022-11-09 15:20:43+00:00): Hello,thatoneiowan!
My name is Kate, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Many thanks for reaching us. 
According to common practice (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#cite_note-1), links shouldn’t have the tag ‘name’, hence I have made a decision to remove the tags ‘name’ from them. Nevertheless, I share your point of view, the data on such signs (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1279859012530100&focus=photo)  can be important for OSM users and must be present on the map. I am sorry for not transferring the value to another tag. The point is that it’s not a typical case for motorway links in the USA, and these signs are almost never used for tagging by OSM mappers. In my opinion, it would be more logical to use for these cases the tag ‘carriageway_ref’ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:carriageway_ref (an example of using this tag in the UK - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074517213). Please, let me know if that sounds reasonable for you, so I would add the removed information to the ‘carriageway_ref’ tag.

Best regards, Kate
thatoneiowan (2022-11-09 16:45:54+00:00): yes, that would be a great tag for that info! if you could add the ramps back in with that tag that would be great but if not i will get around to it:))
kmarkish_lyft (2022-11-10 09:44:28+00:00): Hi, thatoneiowan!  
I’ve added necessary tags in the changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128718490#map=16/41.6520/-93.5741

Best regards, Kate
Tilia_J (2022-10-20 14:35:15+00:00): Met flinke tussenpozen meer dan een jaar onderhanden geweest.

Naast talloze surveys de volgende online bronnen geraadpleegd (bookmarks met URL op verzoek beschikbaar)

Architectenweb zoekresultaten voor 'ov-terminal (arnhem)'.
Arnhem Centraal Architectuurgids
Arnhem Centraal Beeldbank
Arnhem Centraal
Arnhem Central Masterplan - UNStudio
Arnhem Central Transfer Terminal - UNStudio ArchDaily
Ben van Berkel Dit is ervaringsarchitectuur. Architectuur.ORG
Centraal Station Arnhem - Archixplore
Centraal Station Arnhem door UNStudio - De Architect
Cobouw, publicaties van 19 jaar bouw aan het stationsgebied Arnhem Arnhems Persagentschap
Extreme engineering voor station Arnhem De Ingenieur
flickriver Most interesting photos from UNStudio pool
Flip Franssen - New organic Central station Arnhem, the Netherlands LensCulture
Futuristisch station geeft Arnhem allure - Architectuur.nl
infrastructuur_6
Nieuwe perrontunnel station Arnhem Centraal Architectuur.ORG
Officiële opening OV-terminal Arnhem - donderdag 19 november 2015 - Beeldbank Stefan Verkerk Fotografie & Webdesign
OV Terminal Arnhem - Fotografie project - Stefan Verkerk Fotografie & Webdesign
Project Arnhem Centraal - Bouw en Uitvoering - Bouw en Uitvoering
search arnhem centraal Flickr
search garage arnhem centraal Flickr
search parkeergarage arnhem centraal Flickr
Sporen in Arnhem - Fotografie project - Stefan Verkerk Fotografie & Webdesign
Stand van zaken bij de bouw van station Arnhem
Station Arnhem - Middelpunt van verbinding - YouTube
Station Arnhem Centraal Atec NL
UNStudio's Arnhem Central Station is Stunning Azure Magazine
Video van de Week – Station Arnhem - De Architect
Zoek ProRail
Stationsgebouw OV Terminal Arnhem » Zinkinfo NL
Timelapse bouw Arnhem Centraal - YouTube
Film Arnhem Centraal - YouTube
Afbrokkelend beton Arnhem centraal - YouTube
'Spookachtig en extreem donker': Parkeergarage Arnhem Centraal Station nog dagen dicht - YouTube
arnhem centraal station korte impressie
Ben van Berkel - Arnhem Central: A Station with a Twist - YouTube
LET'S EXPERIENCE ARNHEM NEW STATION ! - YouTube
Lift tour Arnhem part 1 - the epic central station designed by Ben van Berkel - YouTube
Routebeschrijving Avisi vanaf de Parkeergarage - YouTube
Leaving parking "centraal" in Arnhem - YouTube
Trainride to Arnhem and underground carpark exploration of Arnhem Centraal - YouTube
Arnhem Centraal - Stations.nl
Station Arnhem Centraal - Wikipedia
Stationsinformatie | NS
Plattegrond | Arnhem Centraal | NS
StationsHuiskamer | Arnhem Centraal
Arnhem Centraal - OV in Nederland Wiki
Gezamenlijke aanpak station Arnhem Centraal
eggie (2022-10-20 19:29:25+00:00): Dag flobot  Een shared lane is een fietssuggestiestrook. Weet je zeker dat die hier aanwezig is. 
Daar is niet eens ruimte voor hier.
oneway=no hoef je niet toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-20 19:30:49+00:00): fietssugestiestrook verwijderd
martien-176 (2022-10-27 10:01:51+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch this short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127842683
MarkusHD (2022-10-20 17:44:10+00:00): Das ist eine Einbahnstraße? Bin mir fast sicher, dass es keine war, als ich da mal durch bin.
Dnaiel (2022-10-23 11:40:24+00:00): Der Bachweg ist verkehrsberuhigt und mehrfach durch Schranken und feste Bügel in Segmente unterteilt, leider kann ich in Streetcomplete unterwegs das nicht klar reinschreiben. Foto wäre hilfreich gewesen. Einbahnstrasse ist falsch, nur von einer Seite zugänglich wäre richtig. Wie notiere ich ein Hindernis für Autos, nur Fussgänger passierbar, nur mit Sonderrechten zu öffnen?
MarkusHD (2022-10-23 22:29:39+00:00): Wenn du weißt, dass es falsch ist, dann solltest du es auch nicht eintragen. Was in StreetComplete nicht geht, sollte nicht über falsches Tagging angenähert werden.

Aber die Bachstraße ist doch auch bereits richtig eingetragen. Ich hatte sie vor zwei Jahren in einen verkehrsberuhigten Bereich korrigiert (war vorher Wohnstraße) und Umlaufgitter und Schranken angelegt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91873531

Nur Sonderrechte hatte ich nicht eingetragen, waren nicht erkennbar vor Ort. Wenn du damit meinst, dass z.B. bestimmte Personen die Schranke öffnen dürfen/können, dann würde mir motor_vehicle=private am ehesten als Tagging in den Sinn kommen. Ob so ein Fall aber vernünftig von einem Router unterstützt werden kann, bezweifle ich.

Die Einbahnstraße hab ich jetzt zumindest mal rückgängig gemacht.
Dnaiel (2022-10-25 21:24:20+00:00): Danke, Du hast volkommen recht. Street complete hat sogar die Frage 'was für ein Fahradhindernis ist dies' aber zum eintragen braucht man doch Vespucci.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-23 00:47:31+00:00): why you removed this road? https://osmcha.org/changesets/127842824/
tomate35 (2022-10-24 12:55:48+00:00): The road is no longer aviable. The zone is under construction at the moment. The access to Jumbo Chacras supermarket is the one established.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127842824
Frans S (2022-11-15 14:12:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please map roads in accordance with this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

Through going roads are never to be tagged as track.

Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-05 16:00:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10116730356/history has shop = accessories that was added in this edit
shop=accessories ? What kind of accessories are sold here? Fashion accessories? Car parts? Gun accessories?

Maybe use shop=fashion_accessories for clothing accessories, shop=car_parts for car accessories or other shop=* instead - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=accessories
Frans S (2022-11-15 11:32:35+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping.
A request. Please don't connect nodes of a road to other features, like here to hedges.
Also leave a gap in the hedge where a road continues on the other side of the hedge.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2022-11-15 11:41:23+00:00): Hi. Another point.
A highway can be identified as a light trace, thickly with a hedge next to it,
The hedges are mostly a thick dark trace. 
You tagged a lot of traces as highway instead of barrier=hedge.
I corrected them
Read also this wiki when and how to tag highways. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
Best regards
Cristoffs (2022-11-15 13:58:41+00:00): Hello! I did not connect, someone before me had to. I return a big to not connect roads with other objects.  I'm learning all the time how to map in Africa. So I try not to change too much if someone has done something before. As for the roads marked as barriers, it was either a marking error or I don't know what because I corrected such markings several times. Please for the second time give me the link I will correct and check to not make such mistakes.
Frans S (2022-11-15 14:04:59+00:00): Hi Cristoffs.  No hard feelings.
I already adjusted them.
As a validator it is my job to correct issues. Often we have to deal with very new mappers who have sometimes no idea how to tag an object. Mostly I send them a message with explanations. 
anyhow, Thanks for your response and keep mapping.
Cristoffs (2022-11-15 16:53:35+00:00): I am also a validator, but I just want to get to know the specificity of mapping in Africa first. That's why I asked for a link, I want to be sure of my work.
45 / 5 000
Wyniki tłumaczenia
Please check the category of roads in this set: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128942720
How would you mark them?
Lejun (2023-12-28 14:26:45+00:00): « vendemiaire » correspond à quoi ?
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 15:14:08+00:00): Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero "6 -9" è errato. Ciao, Andrea PS Ma il ref è corretto?
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 13:52:56+00:00): Questo è da indagare e risolvere, i ref composti anche a me sembrano strani. Per questo il simbolo è un placeholder che indica un eventuale problema. È un caso che sto monitorando. Grazie, Martin
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-24 15:38:21+00:00): Non sarebbe meglio mettere un fixme? Ciao, Andrea