piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2014-12-16 17:15:48+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  I see you've added lots of roads to the southeast of Nagpur that weren't there before.  One thing that you might need to check though is that roads that join in reality do actually join in OSM.  For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314579457 isn't currently joined to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314578039 .  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314579460 also doesn't join at the south end either.
opendcc (2016-09-16 17:17:28+00:00): Hallo,

diese Winterwanderwege bitte als Relation auf den normalen Wege anlegen. So sind die nicht verbunden, nicht routbar und nicht für GPS Geräte nutzbar. Eigentlich gehört das gelöscht.
ToeBee (2014-11-26 15:24:48+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for adding things in Oswego. I'm a mapper up in Manhattan, KS.

One note: You are putting the word "building" in the name field. This is not quite right. It looks like most of the buildings you added are residential homes. They should not have anything in the name field. Things like churches, businesses and schools should have the name of whatever occupies the building. Typically the "name" field is only used when there is some kind of sign with that name on it, visible from the street.

Please feel free to send me a message through OpenStreetMap if you have any questions.
maraf24 (2015-05-06 21:26:53+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
surveyor54 (2014-11-26 22:02:33+00:00): Hallo PolluxHE,
wurde das Haus, nördlich des Schwörer Hauses abgebrochen, oder wurde es aus versehen gelöscht?
PolluxHE (2014-11-27 07:39:43+00:00): Hallo surveyor54,
wenn ich das Haus gelöscht haben sollte, dann aus Versehen. Tatsächlich ist dieser Platz aber wohl gerade auch unbebaut.
ViriatoLusitano (2014-11-27 10:30:08+00:00): Olá SAEGPS,

Reparo que desenhas-te uma linha chamada "teste" com nenhuma etiqueta atribuída.

Compreendo quereres testar as águas desde sítio, mas não tens de te preocupar, é muito fácil mapear!

Começa por ler este guia para iniciantes que em princípio deve tirar várias dúvidas. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Beginners%27_guide

Depois podes fazer o que quiseres, "desenhar" estradas, casas ou até mesmo pontos de interesse.

Espero que fiques por cá muito mais tempo!
SAE GPS (2014-11-27 11:30:42+00:00): Obrigado pela dica.
Já foi apagada a linha.
surveyor54 (2014-11-26 16:25:17+00:00): Hallo PolluxHE,
opening_hours sollten nach folgendem Schema getaggt werden:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de
berndw (2014-11-26 15:40:08+00:00): Bitte lösche keine Wege ohne Kontrolle, ob sie nicht eine Funktion haben.
Ich meine diesen Weg
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146472550/history
Ich werde ihn wiederherstellen
SomeoneElse (2014-12-19 02:28:14+00:00): Does http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3206205761 really exist?  I'm guessing because the name suggests that it might not.
trigpoint (2014-11-26 17:44:12+00:00): Does your Salon have signs outside? Do customers come to you?
Nakaner (2014-11-26 15:48:36+00:00): wurde revertiert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27047727
Nakaner (2014-11-26 15:49:39+00:00): obiger Kommentar gilt nicht, habe falschen Changeset kommentiert
NetWormKido (2014-11-27 14:00:44+00:00): Напиши на форум http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=466341#p466341
Nakaner (2014-11-26 16:36:04+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27048826 http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=28216
Nakaner (2014-11-26 16:37:44+00:00): obiger Kommentar ist hier falsch, falschen Changeset erwischt
jgext (2014-11-26 16:55:59+00:00): Commit log message misleading. Separate section of path to a church mapped by cycling.
chillly (2014-11-26 17:13:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
I wonder if you realise that the area you made has been saved into the live OSM map data. It has not rendered because it is not usefully tagged. Your area looks like a doodle - I can't see anything on the imagery that might be what you were adding. If there something in the real world that you were trying to add, it needs tags, if not it needs removing. Please reply to this discussion to move this on either way.
SomeoneElse (2014-12-19 02:32:17+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27562080
Tomasz Buchholz (2025-02-09 20:27:48+00:00): Cześć,
Czy jest jakaś przesłanka dlaczego ulice mniejszej rangi na Tachominie i Nowodworach zostały podniesione do tertiary?
pavvv (2025-02-09 20:38:49+00:00): Wątpię, żeby autor pamiętał po 10 latach…
Tomasz Buchholz (2025-02-10 10:20:10+00:00): Nie liczę na odpowiedź, ale chcę mieć podkładkę jak będę to zmieniał.
aceman444 (2014-12-28 03:01:00+00:00): Dobry den, to zlucenie bodu "place" so smerovnikom na krizovatke ciest bolo zvlastne. Hlavne sa tym zmenil nazov obce a niektore dalsie znacky (ako "ele") prestavali davat zmysel. Tuto zmenu som vratil spat.
Hernan (2014-11-26 19:47:03+00:00): Error en la descripcion, es la subida de la numeracion de la Avenida General Paz
lezurdis (2014-11-27 13:16:35+00:00): Olá,

Como é o teu primeiro changeset : seja bem vindo e obrigado por juntar-te e ajudar o OSM.

Alterei a rotunda porque havia alguns erros (é normal és novo nisto) : faltava a classificação e havia uma estrada que atravessava a rotunda.

Para acrescentar uma rotunda normalmente fazemos assim :
- partir em bocados a estrada existente
- depois desenhar a rotunda e atribuir a classificação adequada
- e no fim ligar as estradas a rotunda

Estavas a quase bom, só falta-te é um bocadinho mais pratica ;-)

Deixei 2 linhas para tu poderes corrigir :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314636652
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314636649

Nestes 2 casos falta a classificação, temos 2 linhas mas não sabemos se são estrada, rio, caminho ferro, linha de alta tensão, etc ...
Deves atribuir umas etiquetas que descreva o objeto, neste caso são ruas residencial por isso deve aparecer um highway=residential nestes objetos.

Deixo-te procurar como se faz, se tens qualquer dificuldade podes entrar em contacto comigo e tentarei ajudar-te de meu melhor.

Boa continuação.
MarkHunter (2014-11-26 22:19:35+00:00): Renamed joint PdV / PP road
aTarom (2022-06-11 16:45:14+00:00): Hola nubarron, recuerdas por casualidad, ya hace 7 largos años, que sentido tiene el etiquetado de "Victorinox"="romanorum"?
esta es la vía que lo contiene
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314651662/history
al estar el yacimiento romano de Lancia cerca es lo que me despierta la curiosidad.
Saludos.
stephan75 (2014-12-05 12:35:05+00:00): Hallo smarties,
in diesem Changeset hast du jene Autobahnauffahrten gelöscht, wenn man von Dibbersen auf die BAB nach Hamburg will. Ich weiß von den Umbauarbeiten dort, aber hast du die Sachen da aktuell im Blick?
Gibt es demnach bis aktuell keine Möglichkeit von Dibbersen direkt auf die BAB nach HH?
Gruß, Stephan
Dimitar155 (2024-06-24 15:59:39+00:00): Здравей Реактор,

Понеже Малка детелина не съществува от 40 години, смятам да преместя релацията ѝ в OpenHistoricalMap. Понеже лицензите на OSM и OHM са несъвместими, съм длъжен да те питам дали си ок да я прехвърля в OHM с лиценз CC0?

Поздрави,
Митко
REAKTOR (2024-06-24 16:26:15+00:00): Здрасти, нямам против да я преместиш. Виждам, че това е землището и поне в АГКК го водят част оот землището на Трояново.

Поздрави
Dimitar155 (2024-06-25 08:11:54+00:00): Благодаря, вкарах го в OHM и го изтрих от OSM.

https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/changeset/124788
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153144644
mottiger (2018-10-08 10:26:37+00:00): the only boundary of a village in this region.
where is this information from?
Kagami (2014-11-28 04:43:09+00:00): It's right.
But u have broked the area.
plotch (2014-11-28 15:02:02+00:00): Meh,
I've restored my previous edits based on several GPS traces, photos, and a knowledge of my local area (this area is 4 statute miles from my home)
So what have you got?
plotch (2014-11-28 15:04:43+00:00): First you go into an area that I've already described, ridden by bicycle, covered on foot and start changing my edits, then you get stroppy when I restore my previous work. I'd appreciate it if you would explain yourself.
SimonvdP (2014-11-27 20:18:32+00:00): sorry omschrijving klopt niet grotendeels landuse aanpassingen en ik heb geleerd dat de cancel knop tijdens het uploaden niet echt helpt :(
mavl (2014-11-27 15:57:07+00:00): Почему у линий железных дорог были удалены все точки и вместо них добавлены новые? Какой в этом смысл?

Например, у этой линии http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251198021
przemas75 (2016-02-27 19:59:55+00:00): Co to jest Koczowisko?
MKnight (2015-05-12 11:34:26+00:00): Moin, auf der Ausfahrt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49339923 und dem Stück davor hast Du die Lanes von 2 auf 3 erhöht, wurde da zugebaut? Sieht mir nicht korrekt aus, da, die 2 Geradeausspur(en) wieder in eine einspurige münden. Halte ich für ne Länge von 100m recht unwahrscheinlich.

Wenn das neuerdings so korrekt ist, kannst Du bitte auch die Destination anpassen?
BearT (2014-11-28 13:28:31+00:00): Ich bin mir nicht sicher, aber du hast in dem Edit ein Stückchen der Bruck-Hainburger-Straße gelöscht. (way 223404178) Ev. ist es das Teil, das jetzt fehlt.
Siehe auch: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/277476
user_599436 (2014-11-30 17:13:34+00:00): Is there a practical reason why Lake Ontario should be tagged as coastline? The wiki seems to suggest it is incorrect for freshwater lakes.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline

place=lake also seems more correct as they are "The Great Lakes", not "The Great Seas".
HolgerJeromin (2014-12-01 11:40:36+00:00): The US community has decided to use coastline for the lakes.
luschi (2015-03-09 20:20:55+00:00): hast du da was Ausprobiert? Die Fuß- und Radwege stimmen so wohl nicht mit der Realität überein.
lg
AndoB (2015-03-16 18:15:57+00:00): achso, ja hast Recht, wollte nur ausprobieren ob Fuß- bzw. Radwege mit unterschiedlichen Eigenschaften anders dargestellt werden. 

ich korrigiers jetzt
lg
*Martin* (2015-02-23 16:36:09+00:00): Ahoj Mirec

K http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314690781 - tagom playground si asi chcel otagovat celu plochu a nie len jeden jej bod :-)
MirecXP (2015-02-23 17:38:06+00:00): Pravdu mas, dik, opravil som.
SMP (2014-12-01 11:04:20+00:00): Plaça del Tripi? ¬¬'
De veritat cal posar-ho? XD
ullemig (2014-12-05 19:53:08+00:00): loc_name és precissament per aquests casos: "the name of a feature as it is known locally, but only where this is deemed to be too much of a slang name or otherwise unofficial-sounding". Posen com a exemple el Clyde Arc, anomentat "squinty bridge" (pont arrufat) de Glasgow, o el carrer Union de Reading, conegut com "carreró pudent".

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#loc_name

PD: fins i tot Google reconeix noms populars: https://www.google.com/maps/place/plaça+del+tripi+barcelona
ullemig (2014-12-05 20:57:09+00:00): Ostres, no sabia que es podien posar missatges al changeset o_o
casoe (2014-11-27 11:44:51+00:00): Anpassung aufgrund Umbenennung:
http://ratsinfo.aachen.de/bi/vo020.asp?VOLFDNR=10737&options=4
naoliv (2014-12-01 13:26:45+00:00): Vicente, tem alguns detalhes nessa sua edição:
1) você retirou a marcação do muro do cemitério. O cemitério não é cercado por um muro?
2) A população da cidade você colocou como "35.884" mas o valor deve ser inserido sem pontuação, espaço ou outro símbolo
3) Não precisa colocar a cidade ou o local no nome dos objetos. Por exemplo, você colocou o nome do açude como "Açude do DNOCS - Custódia-PE". Basta apenas colocar o nome dele, sem a cidade ou local que ele pertence.
Kanenas (2014-11-27 17:34:47+00:00): ******I'm also leaving this note here (a personal message was send also) beacause i think it's something that it should be discused.*********
I think that the addition of a footway on top of a pedestrian way is not correct. By assigning the area key to a road doesn't mean that it's not a road anymore. Plazas or pedestrian areas in general are free walking areas. Why do we have to restrict the walking path when someone can use the whole area to move? Either leave the footway or the pedestrian road.
MarkusHD (2014-11-28 08:35:23+00:00): With "for the renderer" I didn't necessarily say it was mapped "wrongly for the renderer", but that it was not mapped "for the router", so you may be right that it was mapped to express reality (statement from personal message).
But at least in the current state of various routing software an area normally is not routable arbitrarily, but only at the edges, and I don't think this will change soon. So to be routable there should be ways on top of a pedestrian area. There is already an extra way for routing in the middle of these two parks

According to the Wiki, I don't think that "pedestrian" is the right tagging value at all, at least not for the inner ways, which I have mapped as "footway" on top. I don't want to change mapping behaviour in Athen, so maybe footway was the wrong choice for the routable ways. I have already seen the rendered map and was not happy with the look.

I also don't think mapping the (inner) ways as an area is correct tagging, "area=yes" is used for bigger places, not for narrow ways of only a few meters. For routing, even if routing software would be able to route areas correctly, I don't see my footways as restricting because the affecting ways are too narrow. For rendering there is a different solution to "area=yes" (which would make tags like oneway=yes impossible btw), see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway similar to the same problem for rivers: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=riverbank

Suggestion: I switch the tagging of the ways added by me from "footway" to "pedestrian". OK?
naoliv (2014-12-01 13:28:42+00:00): Vicente, aqui é o mesmo caso: não precisa colocar o nome da cidade no posto: "Posto Shell - Custódia"
SomeoneElse (2014-11-28 22:08:51+00:00): Hi - it looks like http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3207630265 is a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188049296 I think?  Also I'd be very surprised if the licence for the CAMRA "What Pub" guide allowed things to be copied from there to OSM (not that it matters too much in this case, since the pub's already in OSM).

Unfortunately it can be difficult to tell what tags (e.g. in this case amenity=pub) have been added to buildings in the online "Potlatch2" editor - though if you click on a building outline (and perhaps press "/" to cycle through different ways) you should be able to see if something is already mapped.

Anyway - hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help. If you have any questions please feel free to drop me a mail.

Cheers,

Andy
berndw (2014-11-27 16:18:40+00:00): Hallo

Heisst diese Wiese wirklich Acker?
;-)
Namen, sich aus der Funktion o.ä. ergeben sind unnötig, nur so als Hinweis
SomeoneElse (2014-11-30 23:37:02+00:00): Hello - I think something went a bit wrong here - this changeset added "landuse=residential to a very large area http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1332191 .  What was the thing that you were trying to add it to?
Roland Pallai (2015-06-28 17:21:04+00:00): Szia! Területfelhasználást jelző multipoligonok kerültek fölöslegesen törlésre ebben a változtatásban, ezért vissza kell vonnom. :(
Mazezito (2018-04-01 12:12:55+00:00): Parte da “Travessa de Vilar” é uma moradia privada…. É possível confirmar...
ViriatoLusitano (2018-04-01 13:08:56+00:00): Confirmo. já resolvi, obrigado. :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297812704/history
715371 (2015-02-26 21:39:12+00:00): Bitte überprüfe, ob ein Geschäft oder anderes bereits in der OSM vorhanden ist, bevor du es neu hinzufügst!

Folgende Objekte wurde gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3207883469/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3207895861/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3207883261/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3207895861/history
SomeoneElse (2014-11-27 22:09:26+00:00): This changeset seems to delete an awful lot of things over a wide area.  Did something perhaps go wrong with it?
rarad74 (2014-11-27 22:25:19+00:00): With no comment could be interpreted as vandalism...
rarad74 (2014-11-27 22:27:43+00:00): Lok at this https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=280578868#map=17/46.78006/12.04902
Important streets deleted....
holzers (2014-11-28 07:03:42+00:00): I dont know nothing 
I have revert 2 of my changesets
holzers (2014-11-28 07:08:56+00:00): If you can can you delete something of this changeset but not the whole!
See reverter Plugin
SomeoneElse (2014-11-28 10:02:11+00:00): Which changesets of yours were you trying to revert with this one?  As you can see from the bounding box as displayed on the server, it deleted things in China and the USA rather than just north Italy.  The easiest way forward is probably to revert this and then "unrevert" the individual changes that you want to keep - but you'll need to describe what those are better than "some but not the whole".
holzers (2014-11-28 10:48:33+00:00): You could try revert this changeset 270772184
SomeoneElse (2014-11-28 10:50:15+00:00): OK, I'll try.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-28 11:44:32+00:00): Right - that's done now.  Hopefully everything should be back to normal now.  

A couple of other points though:
At https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/46.78931/12.05891 there are quite a few duplicate nodes (nodes either in exactly the same place as another node or very close to one).  This might be because you've joined the landuse to the roads - which usually isn't a good idea (since the area of the school doesn't extend to the middle of the road).

Also, it's really helpful to other mappers if you use a more meaningful changeset description (either "no comment" or "bugfix" don't actually explain what you've changed and why).

Cheers,
Andy
muralito (2014-11-27 21:25:36+00:00): Revertido por incorrecto.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-27 22:15:50+00:00): (for completeness) note added as http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/277305
MarkusHD (2015-08-04 21:06:30+00:00): Wie ist der Status der Brücke (und der Umleitung weiter westlich)? Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/408722
5m4u9 (2014-11-27 19:46:25+00:00): Para dentistas debes buscar el tipo apropiado, es decir, dentista.

Para el hospital, el nombre debe ser sólo el nombre y no sus siglas. si quieres añadir el nombre oficial utiliza la etiqueta official_name. El ID y tipo deben ser etiquetas en inglés y deben seguir un estandar... por ejemplo cnss:id=1350 y cnss:type=0 (donde 0 es centro de salud con cama)
richardbrinkman (2014-12-09 19:14:10+00:00): Ten zuid-westen van ROC van Twente locatie Wethouder Beverstraat staat een lijntje zonder enige tags. Wat stelt dat voor?
richardbrinkman (2014-12-09 19:15:06+00:00): En in het AOC ligt een punt zonder enige tags.
richardbrinkman (2014-12-09 19:16:44+00:00): En iets lager ligt een lijntje zonder enige tags.
Kijk eens op http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=91&error=70488396&zoom=15&lat=52.20671&lon=6.88588&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1 voor meer fouten.
JJJWegdam (2014-12-11 12:57:17+00:00): Allemaal gefixt. Bedankt voor het attenderen. Ik ga proberen mezelf aan te wennen keepright na elke (paar) changeset(s) te raadplegen. Hij staat inmiddels in m'n bladwijzers.
geri-oc (2016-04-11 13:40:56+00:00): Könntest du bitte einmal nach der Note in Reinhardsgrimma schauen Cunnersdorfer Landstraße soll Grimmsche Hauptstraße sein.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/545208#map=14/50.8809/13.7887&layers=N
Gruß Gerd
GerdP (2015-11-24 11:26:35+00:00): Hi there!
I've  noticed the unusual tag 
surface="1.862 ha"
which seems to describe the size of the protected area.
I think there is no need to map the size
in OSM, but if you do, I think a tag like area_size="1.862 ha"  is much better.
The attribute surface is for values like grass,gorund,asphalt.
OK?
Hjart (2014-11-28 10:19:07+00:00): This changeset has messed up a lot of turn restrictions. We'll be looking at reverting it.
Hjart (2014-11-28 10:17:10+00:00): Ridebanen is not a building. I've reverted this change
Bryan_Hun (2014-11-28 10:19:51+00:00): "Felsőpáhok környéki terepi utak (nagyrészt haflinger/TuHu trackjei)"

Haflinger hozzájárult ahhoz, hogy a tuhu-s trackjeit áthozzátok ide?!?
veelaci (2014-11-28 12:08:25+00:00): Szia,
igen:
A fórumban itt járult hozzá:
http://turistautak.hu/forum.php?action=thread&id=osm&message_id=441220

így hoztam át őket: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/veelaci/traces/1817840

itt jeleztem:
http://turistautak.hu/forum.php?s=remek&id=osm&member=pockok

Gyakorlatilag Vas és Zala megyéket érinti. Vassal lassan végzek, közbe-közbe pedig átrajzolok Zalába is (főleg, ha valamelyik terület fókuszba kerül).
Zala egyébként elég problémás az OSM-en (szerintem). Rengeteg az igazítás nélküli műholdképről rajzolt dolog, így nagyon sok minden 10-20 méterrel el van csúszva. Kisebb blokkonként haladok. Lassú, aprólékos munka rendbe tenni...
Bryan_Hun (2014-11-28 12:23:22+00:00): Köszi Laci :)

akkor ennek tudatában frissítettem ezt az oldalt:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Hungary/TuHu/felhaszn%C3%A1l%C3%A1si_hozz%C3%A1j%C3%A1rul%C3%A1sok#TuHu_szerkeszt.C5.91k.2Ftrackel.C5.91k_hozz.C3.A1j.C3.A1rul.C3.A1sai

További jó munkát!

Üdv.: Bryan
veelaci (2014-11-28 19:21:32+00:00): Rendben!
Köszönöm.
luschi (2015-02-20 18:33:48+00:00): Sry, aber woran erkennst du, dass der Kampillerbach bei deiner Änderungen durch ein Rohr fliehst? Und layer würde dann auch fehlen
richardbrinkman (2014-12-09 19:12:19+00:00): Geen idee wat je hier precies gedaan hebt en waarom, maar de manier waarop klopt volgens mij niet.
De tag #building=yes bestaat namelijk niet. Een gebouw begraven in layer=-2 lijkt me ook niet de werkelijkheid te weerspiegelen.
Als de BAG data niet klopt pas het dan aan of splits een gebouw in tweeen (heb je zo te zien gedaan) met behoud van het ref:bag nummer.
Zoals het nu in de database staat ligt er een gebouw bovenop een struktuur met #building=yes (wat dat dan ook moge zijn).