piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-10-01 00:35:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
nevw (2018-10-01 04:40:01+00:00): SnapMaps uses Mapbox and OpenStreetMap data. You have updated the OpenStreetMap database with this mapping and you will need to wait until SnapMaps updates the data to the app. You need to contact SnapMaps to find out when that happens.
aharvey (2018-10-02 00:18:42+00:00): Hey I see you've migrated this node to the campus boundary, that's the right thing to do. :+1
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-04 02:45:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63179380 where the changeset comment is: Backing out of a particularly low quality edit.  Looks like lines were doubled up and left untagged relative to what's visible and odd geometry relative to what's on the ground.
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-03 17:07:06+00:00): Hi gbragaalves, welcome to OSM.

Starting with this changeset, you created almost 5,300,000 map changes within the last two days. Did you discuss this import with the local community? Thanks.
Nakaner (2018-10-03 18:22:00+00:00): Hi gbragaalves,

for your information: Imports must comply with the Import Guidelines, i.e. they have to be discussed in advance on the international Imports mailing list. A documentation on the wiki and the usage of a dedicated import account is required, too.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

It is good that you now clean up the mess you created. But please be aware that people have been banned from OSM and their import been reverted (even if the data was good) in the past because they had violated these rules.

Best regards

Michael
muralito (2018-10-02 00:31:10+00:00): si, es lo que dice la wiki para clubes deportivos.

Tema aparte pero importante, acordate que el valor de addr:street tiene que ser igual al de la calle. Calle 473 en este caso, y el "ex Calle 14" seria old_name=Calle 14
Lokai (2018-10-01 07:49:00+00:00): Du nimmst gleiche Objekte mehrfach in die OSM Datenbank. Hier die Burg.
Matt McCutchen (2018-10-01 02:00:27+00:00): Oops, the changeset description is backwards: the segment was moved from Greenhill Road to Old Lancaster Road.
omgitsgela (2018-10-22 02:38:08+00:00): Good edit, thanks for contributing to OSM! :)
Minh Nguyen (2021-08-03 08:38:30+00:00): FYI, this changeset somehow created a redundant relation for U.S. 278 that had large gaps, possibly based on a relation that was broken in changeset 62564979. I think I fixed the issue in changesets 109072963, 109075864, and 109077198, but if you had intended to make any changes to this route relation in this changeset, I may’ve inadvertently blown them away.
Mishari (2018-12-08 02:17:10+00:00): Several problems with this, #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis

Please remove this and the connecting service road that you've added. This area is now a construction site. Secondary, it's irresponsible to add a service road without identifying what kind of access is allowed through it. Would you appreciate it if your GPS tried to route you through a restricted or private area?
FYI I'm referring to
way 623281660
way 623281690
way 623281658
way 623281656
viloan (2018-10-01 02:54:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
RicoElectrico (2018-10-01 18:18:18+00:00): castle_type=dworek?

Jest na to wartość, konkretniej: manor

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:castle%20type?uselang=pl
Øukasz (2020-05-15 10:25:08+00:00): Hello Solaiman, do you think the classification of this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526960202 fits within the context? Currently these are residential roads not connected to the larger network.
shaikh solaiman (2020-05-17 07:34:33+00:00): Hi @Øukasz  thanks for your review and hope you are doing well and stay safe. This Rd is inside a camp and is not my field data. I just mapped assuming with the satellite imagery and it seemed to me that is a residential Rd for its community. Its not given following international classification of Rd. I gave Residential as it may use as a residential Rd in the camp site. But if you have field level knowledge, you can change. Thank you.
Øukasz (2020-05-15 10:23:34+00:00): Hello Nayeem, do you think the classification of this road fits within the context? Currently these are residential roads not connected to the larger network.
kartonage (2018-10-01 04:40:54+00:00): Potsdam instead of Berlin of course.
mavl (2019-04-21 03:31:40+00:00): Здравствуйте, РТК-Губанов. Спасибо за участие в проекте OpenStreetMap.  
  
По правилам OpenStreetMap ваш вклад не должен нарушать права собственности третьих лиц. Данные проекта Яндекс.Карты не могут быть перенесены в OpenStreetMap, так как нет разрешения со стороны Яндекса. Ваши данные будут удалены из OpenStreetMap. Это предусмотрено условиями участия в OpenStreetMap.
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
mavl (2019-04-30 16:09:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-30 16:08:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Kayla Colflesh (2018-10-01 05:21:19+00:00): See the id tag for all of the reverted changeset id's. I created all of them and I should not have.
Supaplex (2018-10-01 07:44:17+00:00): 這裡是像熱蘭遮城那種城堡嗎?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63083549
literan (2018-10-01 11:23:29+00:00): а что, Прогресс закрылся?
user_610278 (2018-10-02 12:53:43+00:00): Зашёл, уточнил - нет, это моя ошибка :(
В одном помещении находятся Вьет Вок и Прогресс и работают одни как бар, а другие по вьетнамской кухне.
literan (2018-10-02 16:19:50+00:00): исправил
4004 (2018-10-01 21:43:22+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
апо контуру моста маршрут обычно не проложится, продлил дорогу, но поставил как вело/пешеходный, уточните пожалуйста
Anton_Kr (2018-10-02 06:06:45+00:00): ок, у меня опыта мало, поэтому - как лучше, так и оставляем)))
4004 (2018-10-02 15:34:10+00:00): я к тому, что вы не знаете ли, машина там проедет? или только вело/ногами?
Anton_Kr (2018-10-03 05:38:35+00:00): знаю. машина не проедет)) только вел или ноги. он деревянный
4004 (2018-10-03 13:18:13+00:00): ок, спасибо, значит так и оставляем
JJIglesias (2018-10-03 18:51:28+00:00): Hola y Gracias por agregar esos edificios, pero realmente la informacion q necesitamos son los Nombres (si los tienen) y su numero en la calle y la calle donde se encuentren; ademas de los pisos que tengan esas edificaciones.
Saludos
JJ
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-29 14:30:55+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=juices
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5942223444/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=juice
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-10-01 22:59:21+00:00): Regarding the building, if you use the iD Editor, you can "square" the buildings to a perfect geometry (if it applies), by selecting the building and using the S key on your keyboard.
Dentis2L (2018-10-02 07:02:18+00:00): Great feedback, thank you Nuno!
I've just squared all the buildings I've added over the past few days. Very nice feature.
Gh0stz0x (2019-06-13 06:33:45+00:00): Sei passato dalle mie parti senza avvisarmi prima? 😄
Buon mapping! 😁
bubix (2019-06-13 06:51:24+00:00): Beh siccome abiti in posto bellissimo io cerco sempre di " I try to map geographic presence visas". Prossima volta che vengo su ti avverto in tempo dai!
Gh0stz0x (2019-06-13 09:00:22+00:00): 😁👍
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
joost schouppe (2019-04-02 09:49:59+00:00): Hoi Pieter,
Wat je hier gedaan hebt is expliciet niet de bedoeling: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Het is jammer dat je het resultaat op de kaart niet mooi vindt, maar we mappen wat er is zo getrouw mogelijk, zelfs als dat soms een lelijk resultaat geeft. Je kan dan beter bij de makers van de visualisatie gaan klagen dat ze de situatie anders in beeld moeten brengen.
Glenn Plas (2019-04-02 10:02:23+00:00): GRB heeft ook de exacte afmetingen van deze brug in de database.  Deze zijn zeer accuraat.  Je mag echt niet kijken naar de kaart om anders te gaan mappen.  Dit is maar 1 van de vele visualisaties van de data.

Deze brug was reeds uit GRB gemerged.  

source:geometry:date	2003/07/10
source:geometry:entity	Knw
source:geometry:oidn	1765
source:geometry:uidn	1765
eggie (2018-10-01 11:43:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
pitchum (2018-10-17 12:00:22+00:00): Pourquoi ne pas avoir carrément supprimé le nœud ? Quitte à le recréer dans 2 ans quand le magasin rouvrira.
Sinon pendant les 2 ans où le magasin sera fermé des requêtes sur node[shop] continueront d'afficher ce POI qui n'en est pas un.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2018-10-17 12:18:40+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre suggestion.
Le node est rattaché à un passage piéton, et du coup je ne sais pas si je peux le supprimer ou pas du tout.

Merci de votre aide

Cordialement,
pitchum (2018-10-17 19:39:29+00:00): Effectivement j'avais pas fait gaffe à ça.
Il suffirait alors de supprimer tous les attributs du nœud.

Mais je soupçonne que ce passage piéton n'a plus d'utilité dans OSM maintenant que le magasin Go Sport est fermé donc je suggère de le supprimer.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2018-10-18 07:10:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre message.
J'ai donc supprimé le node 

Cordialement,
frosm (2018-10-01 18:36:25+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
je ne suis pas sur de comprendre la précision : l'agence était au no 4, conformément à son site web. elle a déménagée et leur site n'est pas à jour ?!?
US Woods (2018-10-30 13:31:40+00:00): Hi Juan, how can http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629443342 be a rice field and and an olive orchard at the same time?

Greetings
Константин Гам (2018-10-24 12:40:16+00:00): Что за несуразицу вы наносите на карту?
ndm (2018-10-01 18:40:26+00:00): Where's the pitch gone? :-)
JamesBew (2018-10-02 07:42:48+00:00): Nothing changed in that regard.  It only seems to show at zoom particular zoom level.
frosm (2018-10-01 22:38:05+00:00): bonjour,
est-ce que c'est l'école primaire Thomas Corneille ?
c'est 2 écoles ou une seule ?
maraf24 (2018-10-02 06:25:56+00:00): A jaki powód tej zmiany? Droga jakoś się odróżnia od innych dróg residential w okolicy?
RicoElectrico (2018-10-01 18:30:53+00:00): Hej, dwie rzeczy:

1) Każdą edycję można opisać "wprowadzenie zmian", wobec tego taki opis jest mało użyteczny. Lepiej by było "dodano plac zabaw".

Zachęcam do lektury: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments

2) Popatrzałem na inne dostępne oprócz Geoportalu podkłady (po prawej stronie w edytorze możesz sobie je wybrać) i pozwoliłem sobie trochę inaczej wyrysować plac zabaw, moim zdaniem chyba lepiej oddaje teraz rzeczywistość - choć skoro (jak widzę po innych edycjach) masz wiedzę lokalną, to śmiało możesz poprawić ;-)
eggie (2018-10-01 12:03:56+00:00): Je hebt building:architecture  contemporary toegevoegd.  Wellicht om aan te duiden dat het de nieuwbouw betreft? 
Anders een vraag voor het forum.
Voolgens mij kan de verwijzing naar museum en theater er af. De node lijkt me duidelijk genoeg.. anders kun je ook zaken kwijt onder description. 
MVG,
Eggie
Karel Jansen (2018-10-01 20:59:22+00:00): De verwijzing naar museum en theater stond er al, heb ik niet gewijzigd.
eggie (2018-10-01 21:07:36+00:00): Klopt.. maar je zou het evt. kunnen wijzigen.. :)
kreuzschnabel (2019-08-10 20:52:10+00:00): Bitte 1. keine Werbung ins description und 2. das name-Tag nicht dazu missbrauchen, beliebigen Text in die Karte zu setzen. Da gehört der Name rein und sonst nix. Näheres entnimmt der interessierte Kunde der angegebenen Website. Danke :)
eggie (2018-10-01 12:06:25+00:00): Probeer svp gewoon aan te geven welk soort tag je hebt toegevoegd. Bv Architectuurstroming toegevoegd oid. 
MVG,
Eggie
R0bst3r (2018-10-02 06:28:47+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Für mehr Infos, z.B. rund um access siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63090304
R0bst3r (2018-10-02 06:28:49+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Für mehr Infos, z.B. rund um access siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63090304
DD1GJ (2018-10-01 18:54:53+00:00): Hallo ariart-fotokurse, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich habe den Eintrag etwas korrigiert: Webseite, internationale Vorwahl und natürlich craft=photographer als Kennung für ein Fotostudios. Allerdings werden auf der Hauptkarte nur Fotofachgeschäfte mit dem Kamerasymbol angezeigt. Dein Eintrag ist jedoch in der Datenbank vorhanden und wird in der Suchmaschine gefunden. Die hashtags im Änderungssatzkommentar  sind nutzlos, da dieser nur internen Zwecken dient. OSM ist kein Businessportal sondern die Daten dienen in erster Linie der Erstellung einer freien Weltkarte. Wie alles funktioniert steht im Tutorial: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Die Fotostudios der Region kannst Du nach einem Klick auf "Ausführen" hier sehen: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Cqd
eggie (2018-10-01 11:44:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-01 11:49:17+00:00): Beste Saillard.. Je hebt hier een way zonder verdere tags op bestaande paden geplakt. Wat is precies je bedoeling. Ook het commentaar "vanhout" is erg onduidelijk. Al je edits komen daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart van openstreetmap. 
 Realiseer je je dat? 
Je biijdrage zal worden verwijderd. Graag reactie,
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-01 11:51:48+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #63091867
Saillart (2018-10-01 11:57:51+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Mijn excuses,
Ik wilde niet meer dan een bestaande gpx uploaden voor een wandelroute die we zaterdag hebben gewandeld. Dit lukt me voor geen meter en he b die blijkbaar dan ook nog eens eerst openbaar proberen te uploaden.
eggie (2018-10-01 12:20:37+00:00): Ahh duidelijk.. maar dat gaat via GPS-traces uploaden.. dan de locatie zoeken en op uploaden klikken. 
Openbaar is het voor ieder zichtbaar en prive alleen voor je zelf. Er komt dan niet een "way" op de kaart.
In de editor kun je zo'n ge-uploade track zichtbaar maken. 
Er wordt je verder niets kwalijk genomen. 
Dit gaat dus niet via lijnen trekken in de editor.. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-01 12:24:04+00:00): Aanvulling. Zo'n gps track die je upload komt nooit fysiek op de kaart, maar is een soort transparant die je in de editmodus kan helpen op de weg in te tekenen. 
Een ander heeft daar dan iets aan (openbaar) of zelf als je iets op de kaart wilt editen.
eggie (2018-10-01 12:25:40+00:00): Zie hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Upload_GPS_tracks
Kalepom (2020-05-22 22:41:02+00:00): Bonjour Pierre, 
Vous pouvez indiquer le nom complet avec la clé name= et l'acronyme avec l'attribut short_name= 
Vous trouverez toutes les infos sur la page du wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name
4004 (2018-10-01 21:49:20+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
описания строек, пожалуй, все же в description
4004 (2018-10-01 21:52:50+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
на полигоне здания тег землепользования лишний
Mozkun (2018-10-01 11:52:26+00:00): この変更セットで使用した source は、正確には "Bing; Japan GSI KIBAN 2500; Japan GSI ortho Imagery" です。
frosm (2018-10-01 12:28:06+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
puis je vous inviter à ajouter le tag décrivant ce qu'est Odic ? car un objet avec juste un nom est inutilisé par la majorité des outils.
bonne continuation
Hjart (2018-10-01 11:55:56+00:00): Hvad er en "molok"?
OmidHassani (2018-10-01 12:07:24+00:00): Hej Hjart
En molok er en nedgravet affaldsløsning 
Vh
osmviborg (2018-10-01 12:23:01+00:00): Denne måde er bedre til en molok:
amenity=waste_disposal
location=underground
OmidHassani (2018-10-01 12:34:52+00:00): Tusind tak for måden. 
Det er min første gang jeg arbejder med openstreetmap, og har bare lige placeret molokken i forbindelse med undervisning.
Tak for tilbagemeldingen 
Vh
Hjart (2018-10-01 11:58:13+00:00): What is a "moloch"?
Thue96 (2018-10-01 12:08:26+00:00): A moloch i a dug down waste solution. An undergrund trash bin.
Hjart (2018-10-01 12:18:50+00:00): Ok, kan i finde et passende tag på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waste_Processing ?

Bemærk at navnefeltet ikke bør bruges når tingen ikke har et egentligt egennavn
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-10-01 13:10:19+00:00): Looks like I inadvertently displaced a lot of nodes... Now reverting !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63091840
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-10-01 13:22:05+00:00): Reverted... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63094495
aceman444 (2020-11-12 14:47:46+00:00): Zdravim, na stanovistia Slovnaftbajku sa predsa neda odstavit iny bicykel beznej verejnosti, takze by som to ako parkovisko pre bicykle neznacil.
Tomas Kovacik (2020-11-12 15:01:21+00:00): stale je to parkovisko, treba tam dat tag, ze nie verejne
aceman444 (2020-11-12 15:11:08+00:00): No neviem aky to ma prakticky vyznam, ked stanoviste bikesharinhu zaznacene je a teda tam logicky bicykle stoja. Ale ako parkovisko mi to nepripada. A tiez inde v Bratislave som taketo "parkovisko" nevidel.
Tomas Kovacik (2020-11-12 15:12:55+00:00): uprimne mne je to jedno, je to kus betonu vybetonovany len a len pre tie bajky a to ze to inde nieje neznamena, ze to je zle.
aceman444 (2020-11-12 15:23:16+00:00): No bolo to zle, kedze to nebolo oznacene ako pre zakaznikov.
Nemusi to byt v principe zle, ale kazdy novy experiment moze byt vystaveny otazkam. A Cyklokoalicia uz na Namesti hraniciarov a inde urobila dost bordelu a vymyslenych objektov :)
JeroenHoek (2018-10-02 08:28:53+00:00): This https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629480376 should not be tagged as an aqueduct (bridge), because the road is already (correctly) tagged as a tunnel.

See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge

Tagging both the tunnel and the bridge is discouraged.
wyo (2018-10-03 08:59:14+00:00): Aqueduct is correct since it describes what it is. IMO the tunnel/bridge situation does not apply in this case. Anyway the question is more if this tunnel is not an underpass instead.
JeroenHoek (2018-10-03 10:54:51+00:00): Aqueduct is a bridge-tag, so that rule applies. From the surface of the canal you can't even tell it is an aqueduct.

The tunnel however qualifies as a tunnel. From the wiki:

> Where the lower feature is surrounded by earth then the lower feature should probably be tagged using tunnel=* instead.

This is the way this type of aqueduct is tagged in the Netherlands, please follow that convention.

Feel free to leave a comment on the Dutch sub-forum if you disagree.
wyo (2018-10-05 14:39:01+00:00): No, that's not the case. See 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.98960/4.32345
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.97200/4.60222
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.05679/5.84104
I'll open a thread  in forum "General" about this.
chnav (2018-10-01 17:20:45+00:00): Здравствуйте, дворовые проезды это highway=service. ну и про лошадей не надо указывать - там же нет знака "Проезд гужевого трансорта запрещен" ))) К сожалению в Алматы на карте много дурных примеров, помойка а не карта. Но надо понемногу исправлять теги на правильные )))
chnav (2018-10-01 17:24:18+00:00): Hi, plese DO NOT change address system to English, this is pure vandalizm and be reverted. Thanks.
AinurKoki (2018-10-01 17:51:43+00:00): Thank you very much for the comments, I am just learning, so would much appreciate to receive more suggestions.
frosm (2018-10-01 12:28:23+00:00): bonjour et bienvenu sur openstreetmap
il me semble que les informations étaient déjà présente sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122978453
Phyks (2018-11-09 00:05:18+00:00): Hi!

This changeset add a `cycleway:left:oneway` tag on the "Rue Étienne Marcel". However, the associated value is `oppsite` which is not valid.

I guess it should be `-1` instead?

Best,
Meersbrook (2018-11-09 08:05:58+00:00): You're right, it should not be oppsite. I corrected it to opposite. -1 is not, to my knowledge an appropriate value for cycleway:left:oneway.
Phyks (2018-11-09 08:36:00+00:00): Thanks! According to taginfo, I guess it should be -1 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/cycleway%3Aleft%3Aoneway#values.

I did not find a wiki page to confirm/infirm though, but usage seems to be -1.
Meersbrook (2018-11-09 08:46:55+00:00): OSM's wiki discourages the use of -1 and to reverse a way instead. For cycleways I use the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway as reference. Check the discussion tab, the cycleway:left:oneway tag was discussed.
cycleway:left can be enhanced by a third variable (:oneway) and not all renderers will show but it's still a valid tag. Renders will eventually catch up.