piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SK53 (2015-08-17 18:08:22+00:00): First dont rely on the wiki "tracks are for agricultural use". This may be applicable in Germany. In Britain I suspect we will use track or service for any non-public ways which vehicles can be seen to traverse. Most indeed will be for agricultural purposes (including things like Pheasant & Grouse shoots), but many will just provide rough & ready access to whatever facility people are using. For instance many railway lines will have access tracks used by maintenance crews. Also be aware that UK farms are large and often have fields well away from any farmyards.
PlaneMad (2015-08-17 18:22:24+00:00): > For instance many railway lines will have access tracks used by maintenance crews.

This should be an unpaved service road, no?
SomeoneElse (2015-08-17 21:40:34+00:00): Personally, I'd map railway access tracks as "highway=track" as for example at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30010081 , but obviously it depends on what they look like - some are more like service roads, and there are lots that are just footpaths.  Here it's difficult to tell from just the imagery.  I guessed highway=track mostly because that's what it was originally mapped as by "barb-andmike" - from the imagery it could just as easily be a highway=service.  Given that it only goes to a house and some stuff likely connected with the airport, it's likely not an unclassified road.  As a walker what I'd be most interested in of course would be the general access rights there (public footpath, bridleway, whatever) - but that's not viisble from imagery.
PlaneMad (2015-08-18 05:55:36+00:00): Ok this seems a little at odds with how i'm understanding highway tags, that they primarily define function of a way in the road network, otherwise most unpaved roads in developing countries would end up being tagged as tracks.

If tracks in UK don't follow the wiki guidelines of being for agro/forestry use, is there some alternate documentation on when a road becomes a track vs unpaved service road? What would be the guidelines one would give to a completely new mapper in the area?
SomeoneElse (2015-08-18 10:10:21+00:00): slightly related - a discussion on the Dutch forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=32342&p=1
VoWo (2015-08-27 19:52:26+00:00): hier kann ich keine Spielstraße finden, bitte löschen
SomeoneElse (2016-02-24 23:12:14+00:00): For info the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329032013 looks a bit iffy; I've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/518603 so that hopefully it'll get a proper survey.
PlaneMad (2016-02-27 14:26:05+00:00): Thanks Andy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 23:18:04+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=cakes
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3694728925/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=cake
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072336 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Peilscheibe (2015-08-20 12:04:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136001925
oneway=yes auch für Fußgänger? Echt? ;-)
Jojo4u (2015-08-21 05:48:53+00:00): Ja, für Fußgänger gilt oneway ja nicht. Konform nach http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Eigenst.C3.A4ndiger_Weg
Peilscheibe (2015-08-24 16:13:46+00:00): Ein oneway:bicycle=yes wäre ja auch chic
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072335 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
flohoff (2015-08-13 16:57:34+00:00): Hi,
leider hast du keinen changeset kommentar geschrieben was der zweck dieser änderung war. 

Ich habe gesehen das du die beiden gebäudeteile über eine relation zusammengefasst hast. Das ist ja ungemein kompliziert. Ich habe das geändert und EIN gebäude draus gemacht das name, building:levels und die adresse trägt und die relation entsorgt.

Flo
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-08-13 23:23:51+00:00): Proszę uwględnić prawidłowy sposób tagowania adresów w miejscowościach bez nazwanych ulic: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
flohoff (2015-08-13 16:38:02+00:00): Hi,
super das du das gelöscht hast aber warum hast du nicht den dazugehörigen note geschlossen? Ich wundere mich gerade über den Bug und das der POI gar nicht mehr da ist.

Ich habe den Note jetzt geschlossen.

Flo
jiazheng (2015-08-13 09:12:25+00:00): 風力發電機竟然會有圖案出現在標準圖層上耶！
Supaplex (2015-08-13 11:06:14+00:00): 通常畫的時候圈PU跑道的範圍
參考龍安國小跑道
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5176016
內圈可能籃球場、草地也可以畫上去
ueicren (2015-08-13 14:10:12+00:00): 原來如此，感謝。
Rudolf Mayer (2015-08-14 09:56:32+00:00): You created e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365484271 as a golf course; I am not sure what is the best option to map the artificial target greens in the water, but it is for sure not leisure=golf_course, because it is not a golf course per se. It is also not a putting green, because you can't putt there..

Maybe use man_made=pier on it, and just give it a descriptive name? In any case, please remove the golf_course mapping
aceman444 (2015-08-16 01:07:47+00:00): Dobry den, odkial ste cerpali udaje na zakreslenie krizovatky Triblavina? Neuviedli ste ziadny zdroj (znacka source na sade zmien). Okrem toho, ste si isty, ze krizovatka a vsetky cesty uz su takto vybodovane a pristupne? ww.ndsas.sk/useky-triblavina--krizovatka/44364s44898c tvrdi, ze stavba bude dokoncena az v r.2017.
4maa (2015-08-16 20:52:08+00:00): Správna poznámka!
Dokončenie má byť naozaj 2017. Ako to bude skutočne zrealizované, to sa ešte uvidí.
Ako to mám upraviť na plánovanú cestu? V ponuke typov ciest to nikde nevidím...
Zdroj sú stránky nds a enviroportal. Výstavba už prebieha.
aceman444 (2015-08-16 21:21:41+00:00): Na planovane cesty pouzite highway=proposed a proposed=<buduci typ cesty>, t.j. napr. proposed=motorway. Obe znacky na kazdu cestu. Tam, kde sa uz zacne s vystavbou, mozete to zmenit highway=construction a construction=<typ cesty>

Neviem ci je mozne zadat tieto znacky v editore iD, ak by neslo, skuste pouzivat JOSM, ten odporucame.

Dakujem.
4maa (2015-08-17 08:59:23+00:00): Upravené...
("under construction")
aceman444 (2015-08-17 18:17:53+00:00): Ano vyzera to super, dakujem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-26 22:08:49+00:00): Wielkie dzięki za wykrycie nowego kontrapasa!

Na przyszłość - warto dodać też "oneway:bicycle=no".
poroshin (2015-08-13 13:54:12+00:00): нафига???
waldhans (2015-08-14 09:45:24+00:00): Ist das jetzt neu? Gestern bin ich noch auf dem Weg nördlich davon gefahren, und nicht im Gebüsch...
Lobberland (2015-08-14 12:05:55+00:00): Müsste wieder stimmen...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072333 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Christopher (2015-08-19 06:46:10+00:00): Kleiner Hinweis, die eine Hannoversche Straße hast du nicht ganz ausgeschrieben gehabt, habe ich bereits korrigiert.
M!dgard (2015-08-14 09:44:01+00:00): Dag Rutger360x

In deze changeset verwijder je een weg, om hem vervolgens opnieuw te tekenen als een ander wegtype. Dit is niet nodig, je kan het type van een object veranderen in iD. Door de weg te verwijderen, heb je een zogenaamde "relatie" incompleet gemaakt, de "Feestroute Merchtem".

Je hebt de "Veldweg" verbonden met de grens tussen Relegem en Wemmel in plaats van met de straten Hammestraat en Hammesehoek.

Ik heb deze dingen verbeterd.

Ik wil je ook nog vragen of de veldweg wel echt Veldweg heet. Als het gewoon een veldweggetje is zonder naam, mag ze geen beschrijvende naam hebben in OpenStreetMap. Nu wordt geïmpliceerd dat er straatnaamborden met "Veldweg" op staan.

Vriendelijke groeten, M!dgard
romanh (2015-08-15 23:06:24+00:00): Hallo Simon,
danke für das "eröffnen" der Strasse. - Ich bin zurzeit gerade in Bremgarten im Militärdienst.
Gruss Roman
MikeN (2015-08-19 20:50:58+00:00): Hi, Thank you for your edit!    It appears that an entire railroad has been accidentally moved, and now seems to be misaligned.  I can undo this change; let me know what you wish to do.
MikeN (2015-08-20 12:40:03+00:00): It looks like someone else had moved the entire rail first in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33235552 .   But there was also work since done by several people with local crossing fixes, so moving the entire rail was no longer possible.   I manually fixed the entire line.
aarthy (2015-11-16 08:24:22+00:00): Thank you so much for doing so and sorry it's taken me so long to reply.
freeExec (2015-08-13 14:17:33+00:00): Вот чисто из любопытства, какова достоверность индексов?
bekreyev (2015-08-13 14:26:12+00:00): Соглашусь, надо всё проверять, проверил по http://www.russianpost.ru/resp_engine.aspx?Path=rp/servise/ru/home/postuslug/searchops и исправил
freeExec (2015-08-13 14:19:04+00:00): 22 с10
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Голосования/Правила_написания_номеров_домов
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072332 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072331 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072330 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Syoma11rkomi (2016-01-13 12:37:49+00:00): Ярашью, последний поселок в Усть-Куломском районе)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072328 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
yamada-as (2015-08-21 21:09:53+00:00): Hi, Could I ask you why removed bi-lang name?

May you didn't know about discussion running here http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=525130
M!dgard (2015-08-14 09:16:42+00:00): Ter info: "cutting" betekent landuitsnijding, i.e. aan beide kanten geflankeerd door een klif. Ik vermoed dat je misschien bedoelde dat deze weg een shortcut is. Daarvoor hebben we echter geen tag.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072327 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072324 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072322 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072319 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072318 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:16:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072317 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
woodpeck (2015-08-16 23:45:03+00:00): This is a data import that violates our import guidelines because it was neither first discussed on the relevant mailing list (i.e. the imports mailing list), nor is it (and the permission that was granted according to http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jotam/diary/35579) properly documented on the Wiki. The next time you do an import, please discuss it beforehand; and in this instance, please pop in to lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports and explain where you got the data from, what form the permission took, and what, if any, rules you applied when importing.
Jotam (2015-08-17 06:50:20+00:00): This was my first import into OSM, so thanks for the advice on how to do it more according to community standards next time. I will take the time to explain more of it on the imports mailing list. Thanks!
SeverinGeo (2024-01-25 14:20:08+00:00): The water wells are still in the OSM database. Should not they be removed?
Jotam (2024-01-25 14:28:02+00:00): Why should they? The quality of the data is very good and the import was accepted more than 8 years ago.
SeverinGeo (2024-02-21 19:03:07+00:00): Sorry. I did not see that you proceeded to a respectful import afterwards. Congrats!
aceman444 (2015-08-23 20:33:26+00:00): Dobry den, nedavno ste zmenili cestu way 4311467 (cesta druhej triedy 514) na highway=track. Dufam, ze to bol len omyl, pri editacii napajajucej sa polnej cesty, pretoze tato cesta existuje ako normalna asfaltova. Prosim davajte na to pozor. Dakujem.
naoliv (2015-09-05 04:00:59+00:00): Aguiar, de novo você alterou a classificação da cidade.
Por favor, não faça isso. A classificação é dada pela população do local.
"village" não significa que o local é uma vila, mas que possui uma população menor de 10 mil habitantes.
Use essa tabela para evitar erros futuros: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:place#Valores
Stereo (2015-08-14 13:28:51+00:00): Hi Peter,

It’s cool that someone is finally mapping Esch! We still have a lot of streets with no name there: http://qa.poole.ch/?layers=TTTF0B&zoom=15&lat=49.53633&lon=5.89312

There's a list of the streets that are still missing in Esch at http://streetlist.openstreetmap.lu/json/missing/Esch-sur-Alzette.json , and probable typos at http://streetlist.openstreetmap.lu/json/similar/Esch-sur-Alzette.json . Some of those, like rue Edison, are just missing a first name, and will be in https://streetlist.openstreetmap.lu/extra/Esch-sur-Alzette.json .

Happy mapping,

Guillaume
flohoff (2015-08-13 16:51:39+00:00): Hi,
du hast in diesem changeset leider keinen changeset kommentar das du den Gipfel verschoben hast. Dazu kommt mir das mit dem "ele=148 m" komisch vor. Soweit ich mich entsinne sind elevations doch immer in meter - d.h. das "m" ist obsolete und könnte ggfs beim maschinellen auswerten auf die backe gehen.

Flo
Cranberry Center Dental Services (2015-08-13 16:13:28+00:00): Cranberry Center Dental Services is a full service dental Office with an in-house Denture Lab tech. Please refer to our website
ToeBee (2015-08-13 16:20:23+00:00): You added a point with nothing but a name on it. While this will result in a name search correctly finding this location, you have not actually indicated that this is a dental office. If you go back to edit, click on the point you created and then click on the "Point" in the upper left of the window you can type "dentist" in the search box and flag this location so that it will show up correctly on the map and in searches. Also, you can add details like address, phone number and website to the point.
ToeBee (2016-01-07 17:38:03+00:00): I went ahead and added the dentist tag. You can see it now actually shows on the map.
DaveLakowski (2015-08-13 17:59:33+00:00): by highway=no are you saying there should be a path but isn't? I'm curious because I'm not really sure how to map rights of way with no physical presence.

Cheers
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-08-14 07:17:42+00:00): Cześć, tutaj coś się nie domknęło: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1746431
StellanL (2015-11-02 00:38:58+00:00): "1Iroship South Plaza" is a very strange name for a street. Is this the garage or the 3rd floor pedestrian plaza reachable by stairs at the west and east end?
ediyes (2015-11-09 15:41:18+00:00): Hi StellanL
Thanks for noticing this!  I added a note here http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/465388 to the local mappers to resolved. 
Thank you again.
Edith
Gijs Blonk (2015-08-13 21:08:58+00:00): This is the situation
http://www.bonaire.nu/2015/05/26/nieuwe-rotonde-gedeeltelijk-in-gebruik/ 

Groeten Gijs Blonk
skorasaurus (2015-08-13 20:34:10+00:00): Hi, 

Great edits! Thanks for adding them! 

Is the Residence Inn that you added the same hotel as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1656343446 or are there two separate hotels down there? (I don't remember ;) )
wlgann (2015-08-13 21:17:36+00:00): I was just in the Residence -- I didn't place the other node but there is no hotel there so it's now removed
luiswoo (2015-08-13 19:48:18+00:00): как и угла здания
Alecs01 (2015-08-16 13:00:13+00:00): Por favor no creen falsas "pistas" inexistentes en el mapa, para trazar rutas hay que utilizar relaciones: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
GerdP (2015-11-18 15:03:57+00:00): Hallo,
bitte mal prüfen:
oneway=yes;no
an mehreren Straßen. 
Auf den Luftbildern kann ich nicht erkennen, was stimmt.
way 365574602,way 365574594,way 363377246
sorcrosc (2015-08-13 18:33:31+00:00): non sono riuscito a caricare la traccia come gpx
d3mol3k (2015-08-13 18:38:33+00:00): Za szybko kliknąłem - poprawiłem błąd w składni było turn:lanes: a powinno być turn:lanes 

mój błąd
M!dgard (2015-08-14 11:04:38+00:00): Dank u!

En ook bedankt om een deftig commentaar bij uw wijzigingenset te schrijven!
Alecs01 (2015-08-16 13:01:55+00:00): Por favor no creen falsas "pistas" inexistentes en el mapa, para trazar rutas hay que utilizar relaciones: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
literan (2015-08-14 13:07:40+00:00): правильно leisure=pitch - тегом stadium обозначается вся территория крупного стадиона. А тегом leisure=pitch - именно территории конкретных площадок - идет ли речь о "Лужниках" или о дворовом поле.
Alecs01 (2015-08-16 13:06:41+00:00): Por favor no creen falsas "pistas" inexistentes en el mapa, para trazar rutas hay que utilizar relaciones: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
maraf24 (2015-08-14 19:24:49+00:00): tertiary na residential to jest bardzo drastyczna zmiana z punktu widzenia nawigacji, niektóre będą prowadziły naokoło Litewską i Żmudzką.
Pozostaje też na południu wisząca Gorlicka jako tertiary. 
Może ze względu na znaczenie i autobusy Nowogorlicka i Gorlicka powinny być unclassified?
Gehrke (2015-08-16 13:04:13+00:00): Eigenschaften der Grenzrelation VG Eichstätt wurden falsch "korrigiert" bzw. gelöscht. Werde das auf den alten Stand zurücksetzen.
Macrodat (2015-08-20 19:37:22+00:00): Hallo Gehrke, da bin ich nicht ihrer Meinung. Die Nachbarkommune der Stadt Eichstätt ist eindeutig die Gemeinde Pollenfeld. Sie wird zwar von der Verwaltungsgemeinschaft Eichstätt verwaltet, aber hoheitlich gesehen heißt es Gemeinde Pollenfeld mit eigenem Bürgermeister und Gemeinderat. 
Ich bin noch Anfänger, und lasse mich auch gerne bei sicherer Quelle überzeugen.
Gehrke (2015-08-20 19:50:53+00:00): Das ist korrekt. Aber die geänderte Relation 2971578 für die Verw.Gem. ist die falsche. Richtig wäre 943533.
Gehrke (2015-08-20 19:54:46+00:00): In Schernfeld ist man sicherlich nicht in Pollenfeld. "Gemeinde" ist nicht Bestandteil des offiziellen Namens, sondern nur der Typ der Gebietskörperschaft.
So meldet es Bayern auch an DESTATIS.
janes (2015-08-14 18:23:15+00:00): hola Ramon,

he posat el nom a l'edifici i he borrat el node
zarl (2016-04-19 08:58:15+00:00): Hi jekyl, ich habe da noch einen fehlerhaften Eintrag von dir gefunden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1341601215/history 
 Du hast die Höhenangabe für Staples eingetragen, der Laden liegt jetzt mit 0m auf Meereshöhe. Hast du das evtl. mit dem Stockwerk verwechselt? Das wäre der key level gewesen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:level

Als Anfänger solltest du evtl. öfter mal im Wiki nachsehen, eine sehr umfangreiche Liste findest du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

Und als allgemeine Einstiegsseite sehr übersichtlich und hilfreich: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Editing

Gruss,
Zarl

ps.
ele=0 lösche ich jetzt, weil es falsch ist und ich nicht genau weiss, ob du tatsächlich das Stockwerk eintragen wolltest.
jekyl (2016-04-20 18:44:51+00:00): Hi Zarl - danke für die Hinweise und das ausbessern. Das WIki kenne ich natürlich, habe es aber (auch natürlich) nicht komplett gelesen. Die Sache erschien mir in dem Moment einfach selbsterklärend, aber da lag ich offensichtlich falsch.
Da ich ein Gelegenheitsdatenergänzer bin, werde ich mich in Zukunft darauf beschränken, die Basics zu ergänzen die absolut unmissverständlich sind :)

Viele Grüße und Danke,
jekyl
zarl (2016-04-22 10:22:40+00:00): Keiner muss (oder könnte) das Wiki vollständig lesen, es ist halt ein irrsinnig praktisches Nachschlagewerk, und ich entdecke da auch immer wieder neue Wege zum Ziel. Und bei layer/level muss ich selber immer wieder nachschauen :-)

Lass dich bitte nicht bremsen!

Gruss,
Zarl
eggie (2018-09-26 19:51:00+00:00): Na een jaar weer een edit.. , maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-18 12:43:33+00:00): Hi - just wondered what was the source of the tag changes here?  "natural=well" isn't very clear; how did you know what to change it to?
jc67 (2015-08-29 09:51:43+00:00): agreed - changes reverted back.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-29 12:18:35+00:00): Thanks
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-08-13 23:13:47+00:00): Proszę uwględnić prawidłowy sposób tagowania adresów w miejscowościach bez nazwanych ulic: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Nighto (2015-10-11 23:02:03+00:00): Thiago, o traçado da ciclovia da Barra é exatamente o traçado do Elevado das Bandeiras. O projeto é utilizar a faixa de rolamento da esquerda do tabuleiro superior (sentido Barra), reduzindo a largura das faixas de rolamento atuais. Essas obras só irão iniciar quando as obras da duplicação do elevado, atualmente em curso, estiver concluídas.
ThiagoPv (2015-10-16 20:52:32+00:00): Ok, na época que fiz essa edição eu não havia encontrado nada dizendo como seria então imaginei daquela forma. Já modifiquei. Claro que continua como um esboço a ser corrigido quando houver ou imagem de satélite ou traços de gps.
Foi mal pela demora na resposta.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-18 12:08:17+00:00): Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224860823/history - d'oh!  Thanks!
kreuzschnabel (2018-11-06 20:14:55+00:00): Die Straße ist jetzt in Betrieb, und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365604687 liegt etwas planlos in der Gegend rum. Ist das noch aktuell oder kann das raus?
walloHerbrechtingen (2018-11-07 21:58:24+00:00): Hallo! Danke für den Hinweis. Bin damals zweimal vorbeigekommen und hab keine Ahnung wie es jetzt dort aussieht. 
Sehe grad, dass ein Mapper Kollege dort grad tätig war.
kreuzschnabel (2018-11-07 22:14:38+00:00): Wenn man auf der neuen Straße durchfährt, bekommt man jedenfalls nichts von Ausgrabungen mit. Ich würde sagen, das kann weg.
kreuzschnabel (2018-11-07 22:14:57+00:00): Ergänzung: Mapillary hat Bilder von der neuen Straße.
walloHerbrechtingen (2018-11-07 22:19:03+00:00): Oh, danke für den Hinweis. Hatte mir schon vorgenommen, nächste Woche dort vorbeizuschauen. Mach ich vielleicht trotzdem.
Klar, dass die Ausgrabungen längst beendet sind.
Geofreund1 (2019-05-04 09:09:46+00:00): Die letzte Anmerkung ist nun auch schon wieder 6 Monate her. Wäre schön, wenn das mal endlich bereinigt würde (Linie ohne Tags). Landuse=grass?
SomeoneElse (2015-08-18 12:46:14+00:00): For info - I don't understand the "object not closed" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307692844 as it's part of http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3782630 .  Obviously there's some mismatch on tags that needs resolving but it's not a non-closed object.