piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mgpx (2016-01-06 00:22:52+00:00): A https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389775327 útszakasz a vadásztársaság lezárt területén vezet át (körbekerített vaddisznóskert, éleslövészettel), a turistaút megszűnt, gyalogosan sem lehet átjárni.

gyalogosan sem járható, és a turistaút átvezető szakasza is már rég megszűnt
Domcsi (2016-01-06 11:47:24+00:00): Ki kell venni belőle a szakaszt.
A duplikált utakat javítottam nem erre figyeltem.
rza31 (2016-12-03 21:46:09+00:00): Hallo Wegavision,

die von dir eingezeichneten Gebäude im Bergring haben als addr:street "Büchenstraße". Mit dem Kartenstil coloure streets https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De:Styles/Coloured_Streets sieht man schnell die richtige Zuordnung von Haus+Straßenname.

Gruß rza31
Hjart (2016-01-05 22:19:35+00:00): There is fixme on one of these. As you fix it it's a good idea to remove that fixme.
Self-Perfection (2016-01-06 06:45:27+00:00): Читайте, пожалуйста, описания тегов, которые используете!

Вы в этой правке обозначили газон как natural=grassland , но этот тег обозначает большие естественные (в живой природе, не в искусственной городской среде) пространства, преимущественно заполненные травой. Правильнее использовать landuse=grass.

Просто сравните описание в вики http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dgrassland и http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

Вообще использование natural=wood для участков с деревьями во дворах у меня тоже вызывает большие сомненияв корректности. Но как правильно их обозначать просто не знаю.
dvdhoven (2016-08-26 07:53:38+00:00): Het centrum van Beilen is eind 2013 flink op de schop gegaan. Bing is daar verouderd. Ik heb nu met Cyclomedia, luchtfoto van 2014, de situatie bij de Linthorst Homanweg, Nassaukade, Markt aangepast.
Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
BeKri (2017-08-17 14:41:12+00:00): Servus,
in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314632059
hast Du die Hausnummer von 2a nach 4 geändert ... Sicher ?
Weil 4 und 4a gibt es weiter nördlich, macht also irgendwie keinen Sinn /die 4 2 mal)
Gruss der BeKri
Chemist72 (2017-08-17 19:42:23+00:00): Grüß Dich, BeKri,
da hast Du Recht. Danke für den Hinweis. 2 x 4 in der Arnpeckstr. macht keinen Sinn. Die 4 nach der 2 muss ich mir nochmal ansehen. Müsste eigentlich eine 2a sein. Solltest Du früher hinkommen als ich, ändere es bitte.
Gruß
Chemist
SomeoneElse (2016-01-16 12:45:55+00:00): Hello,
You've added a "ref" here of "Stana␣V-Ocolire␣7␣km" to http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=303316467 .  This seems a very unlikely ref (and it seems very unlikely that a grade2 track would have a "ref" at all).  Can you please explain the source of it?  If you're adding refs or names just to make something appear on a handheld GPS, please don't - OSM is about recording things as they are, not as you'd like them to be (and of course a GPS can easily tell you how far it is to Stana anyway).

Also please do use meaningful changeset comments - "repair work" does not explain to other mappers what you changed and why, and what the source of the change was.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behald of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
Müszi (2016-01-16 19:18:31+00:00): Hello,

You repeatedly changed the highway type for a lot of ways from "track" to "unclassified". These ways are definitely forest tracks, I've been there many times (for example, please have a look at my photo: http://ekenagyvarad.ro/pictures/2012-10-21-Biharfured-sunyi-tura/20121021-110910-p1050239.jpg taken from 46.6716° N, 22.6217° E, facing east).

I already wrote you a short tutorial on how to map forest tracks, sent links to the wiki pages, so please try to respect those rules and don't destroy other people's work.

Zsolt Bartos-Elekes ("Müszi")
pitaclisausturoi (2016-01-31 16:13:39+00:00): hello world ,  happy valentines  and be good to your mother
pitaclisausturoi (2016-01-31 16:30:26+00:00): there are real problems in europe  much urgent to answer
The European border agency estimates that around 710,000 migrants and refugees entered the EU since January, compared to 280,000 for the whole of 2014.

The crisis — spurred largely by Syria’s civil war — has caused numerous political spats, leading to the construction of walls around certain countries and the closing of borders between others.

Now, a new obstacle is about to make a desperate situation worse: winter weather.

Winters in Europe can be extremely dire, especially in the Balkans, where thousands of migrants and refugees are currently passing through, trying to make their way to richer European countries like Germany and Sweden. And even if they manage to make their way to Germany, there is no guarantee they will get to stay somewhere warm.

The different countries and aid organisations’ resources are already stretched to a breaking point and failing to find accommodation for the hundreds of thousands of refugees and migrants coming to Europe. A survey for the German newspaper Die Welt indicated that over 40,000 people are still living in tents in Germany.

The first snow of the season fell in Germany last week and the weather will only get worse from here. Aid groups also warn the weather will heighten the risk of conflict and disease , so the problems of europe its not the way someone  maps , but the fact we are blind to the real problems of europe
pitaclisausturoi (2016-01-31 23:56:49+00:00): we have local  ethnic problems as well ,  for example extremist organizations would like to wipe off Romania out of the world map , divide it and attach it to other country as counties 
these extremist organization infiltrate people at different level , from politics to mapping , even a quick look at their editing shows up  what they are up to  
some people are born like pitbulls , their approach is violent , their language starts with " i told you , i showed you  " and they consider themselves way better and superior then others , but reality shows otherwise
i am a very tolerant person , and most of the times ignore  provocation , reason why i do not replay to message full of hate
Müszi (2016-02-01 17:17:05+00:00): > we have local ethnic problems as well

I know, I lived in Romania 32 years.

>  for example extremist organizations would like to wipe off Romania out of the world map , divide it and attach it to other country as counties

This is perfectly valid any time in history for any random country in the world and for its neighbor countries :-)

> i am a very tolerant person, and most of the times ignore provocation

I don't see any provocation, we just asked you (very politely!) to explain why did you make some changes.

>  i do not replay to message full of hate

I can't discover hate in *my* messages ;-)
Glassman (2016-01-06 01:02:31+00:00): Please add a tag to describe what the object is. My guess would be amenity=library. The tag allows the proper icon to be displayed.
muralito (2016-01-06 19:33:18+00:00): Hola.
Porque borraste los "platform"?
LaPela (2016-01-06 20:06:24+00:00): Primero porque la plataforma era todos objetos seccionados, segundo porque no es una plataforma sino un anden de ferrocarril y tercero porque no cubría todo el andén
muralito (2016-01-06 21:53:57+00:00): OK. Me parece que te estas confundiendo. Lee la documentacion de transporte publico y vas a ver que la estacion estaba bien mapeada. "platform" es anden. Es asi como se mapea.

Capaz que estas te estas confundiendo con el idioma o el editor ID esta mal traducido. En OSM los elementos no se mapean con la traduccion literal del ingles al español, sino con la traduccion del concepto en si mismo, de la descipcion entera.
LaPela (2016-01-06 22:06:12+00:00): Ahi cambie lo que me dijiste, me pasas la documentación? Así la puedo leer
muralito (2016-01-07 00:13:01+00:00): Por documentacion lo mejor es el wiki, wiki.openstreetmap.org (ahi hay de todo, algunas cosas traducidas y otras no) o por ayuda el foro http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=49

Hay mucha documentacion. Yo te recomendaria que parte del tiempo que le dedicas a OSM leas lo que te interese mas, asi podes describir bien todo lo que queres.
LaPela (2016-01-07 13:50:53+00:00): Gracias! Si eso voy a hacer, me interesa mucho ayudar en este tipo de proyecto
rbuffat (2021-10-11 19:06:50+00:00): Hi kaitu
I hiked last week from Breno to Monte Lema and it looks as a lot of the guideposts have changed.  I created a photo of all guideposts which had destination names on it (no way markers) See the gallery here [1].
I put "disued:" in front of the name/elev/descriptions tags of the guideposts that were removed, but I'm not sure if this is a good way. Also I'm not sure what to do with the destinations signs. Maybe you could have a look at my changeset [2].

lg rene

[1] https://photos.app.goo.gl/ErV9jWTST4jHQ2GX6
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112387703#map=14/46.0470/8.8507
[3] https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16!46.0389!8.8555
kaitu (2021-10-11 21:45:58+00:00): Hi rene,
thanks for asking. 

I'd say that if a guidepost is no more in place, it belongs to OSM history. Therefore it should just be deleted from OSM, and all relevant destination sign relation deleted as well. .

I'd use the "disused" prefix maybe only for guidepost which are still in place, but clearly non to be considered.  For example, the pole has been purposely eradicated and the sign placed aside, or the information intentionally masked. I have seen such situation due to work in progress, or when the path to a destination is currently not passable. They are often temporary situations, so each case should be evaluated.

If the guidepost has been changed, and the description is not current anymore, it should at best modified to reflect the current state, otherwise  deleted. Even if the guidepost has been changed, I would keep the destination_sign relations for the destinations which are unchanged. 

For the guidepost which are still in place, a link to the your relevant image would surely be useful.
evod (2019-09-19 18:39:55+00:00): Ich weiß nicht ob die Wege im Waldstück entlang des Telephonwegs vor drei Jahren exisitert haben, aber im Moment ist dort absolutes Dickicht - daher lösche ich die Wege alle. Ich frage mich außerdem woher die Namen der Wege kommen? z.B. Südweg.
Alan (2019-01-29 01:19:42+00:00): Is this an official protected area? Or is it just the area where these people live? The Wikipedia page doesn't say it's protected: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayuu_people
Humberto_Yances (2019-01-29 02:50:31+00:00): Is just the area where they live, cool if you can apply a correction.
Oberaffe (2016-01-09 21:37:25+00:00): Dear Rohit,

can you please describe the usage of the from you created numbers.

Best regards
keithonearth (2016-09-23 17:37:56+00:00): I'm sorry to have to inform you that I have reverted this changeset. 

I have not been able to find any nodes that are correctly tagged in it. The majority of the nodes are just name=`xxx`, with `xxx` being a 3 digit number. The odd node has name=`note`, with `note` being a some sort of description of road conditions or an amenity. Some of these nodes would have been useful uploaded as notes (you can add these using the speech bubble icon on the right hand side of the main website, seehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes for more info).

It should be pointed out that we do not map if a road is "crowded" or not, because this changes with time of day, etc, and we only map permanent things.

Also see http://learnosm.org/en/ to get a better idea of how mapping on OSM works.
keithonearth (2016-09-28 20:28:34+00:00): I've reverted this changeset, due to the same issues as the others (it consists of many disconnected nodes with meaningless names)
keithonearth (2016-09-28 20:12:42+00:00): I've reverted this changeset, as I am unable to find anything constructive in it. Please feel free to ask me any questions if you have any.
keithonearth (2016-08-09 20:38:23+00:00): All of the nodes added by this edit contain only name tags, with no other tags. The name tags make no sense, eg "name=522 - STRAIGHT AT JUNCTION",or just "name=512". 

Because of this I reverted this edit, with the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41354365
keithonearth (2016-09-23 18:09:01+00:00): I'd be interested to hear abou the meaning of your edit, and the process you used to come up with these nodes in either way.
keithonearth (2016-09-28 20:08:46+00:00): I've reverted this changeset. It consists of a large number of disconnected nodes, that are tagged in a way that has no meaning in the OSM context, nor am I able to interpret them.
keithonearth (2016-08-10 00:28:22+00:00): This also seems to be a bunch of nodes that have been erroneously uploaded. They seem to refer to directions provided by a GPS devise for someone's trip at some point. Also this is not in HP, as the summery states.
keithonearth (2016-09-28 20:31:07+00:00): I've reverted this changeset, due to the same issues as the others. (many disconnected nodes, with meaningless tags)
keithonearth (2016-09-28 20:31:58+00:00): I've reverted this changeset, due to the same issues as the others. (many disconnected nodes, with meaningless tags)
Hjart (2016-01-06 13:27:01+00:00): Det "baggrundskort" du har brugt er Bings fotos, som er et par år gamle. Bemærk at du i "baggrundsindstillinger" kan vælge "Geodatastyrelsen". Deres billeder er fra foråret 2015.
Atlask (2016-01-10 10:48:07+00:00): Hej Hjart. Mange tak for din kommentar - det er en stor hjælp. Udfordringen er dog at jeg ikke kan hitte punktet "baggrundsindstillinger" - kræver det at jeg redigerer via noget andet end log-in på web?
Atlask (2016-01-10 10:59:07+00:00): Jeg ser nu, at alting ser anderledes ud hvis jeg bruger en anden browser. Jeg brugte Chrome og der er ingen mulighed for at vælge baggrundsindstillinger. Men Explorer kunne vise det. Tak for hjælpen.
Hjart (2016-01-10 11:17:28+00:00): Super at du fandt ud af det. Jeg foretrækker JOSM og bruger kun sjældent iD (web-redigeringsværktøjet), så jeg var ikke klar over det problem. Firefox viser også alle indstillingerne.
Måske du allerede har bemærket at jeg har rettet i dine rettelser mm?
Iøvrigt velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
user_5359 (2019-12-07 06:41:13+00:00): Hello! What ist the meaning of contact:qq (see https://www.osm.org/node/3929910530)?
Self-Perfection (2016-01-06 14:54:57+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Внесение адресов в тег name это вопиющая ошибка! Ещё раз прошу ознакомиться с разъяснением того, что является названием http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия

Для указания компонентов адреса предназначены свои теги http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr

Даже без изучения вики можно было разобраться, в сотне метров есть дома с корректно обозначенным адресом, можно было взять их за образец.
Self-Perfection (2016-01-06 15:02:15+00:00): Также (но это уже рюшечки) вы обозначили здания как уже построенные. Если они ещё в процессе возведения, то лучше на период стройки обозначить как описано в http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:building%3Dconstruction
Self-Perfection (2016-01-06 15:12:41+00:00): Вы в этой правке обозначили офис продажи квартир простой точкой с тегом name.

Это бессмысленное обозначение. Т.е. оно не наполнено смыслом для автоматических систем и они скорее всего не будут пользователю показывать это "непонятно что" (пусть и с названием).

Я попробовал поискать по вики, видимо это office=estate_agent ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:office%3Destate_agent )
Может быть ещё и building=yes, но это уже во вторую очередь.

Совет: многие находят удобным искать как что-то обозначить в общем списке http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить (далеко неполном, но в большинстве случаев выручает).
freeExec (2016-01-13 10:33:23+00:00): Собственно и на полигоне стройплощадки "строительсво" лишнее
Rom1 (2016-01-06 13:01:13+00:00): Cette pharmacie est fermée cf. http://www.estrepublicain.fr/edition-de-nancy-ville/2015/10/10/nancy-du-mouvement-parmi-les-pharmacies
Trezheur (2016-01-06 19:54:47+00:00): Et paf dans la gueule la source d'information qui décrédibilise mes contributions OSM :D
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-01-06 10:28:42+00:00): Niestyk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3930005775
Rzezimierz (2016-01-06 10:37:32+00:00): Poprawione :)
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-01-06 11:24:01+00:00): Rzuć mi jakimś normalnym adresem mailowym to będę forwardował Ci raporty dot. granic - tak chyba będzie łatwiej.
GerdP (2016-01-07 10:58:14+00:00): Hi there!
Please note the spelling:
highway=tertiary, not teritary ;-)
I think I corrected this a few times now.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389845428
Rom1 (2016-01-06 14:20:30+00:00): Fermée aussi. Attention à l'intégration...
zors1843 (2016-01-06 12:23:27+00:00): You duplicated two ways. (new way on top of existing way) : Rue de Heusy and Rue des Carmes.
joost schouppe (2016-01-08 16:56:46+00:00): Et aussi, vous avez indique trois batiments en un seul village comme mairie. Je ne crois pas que c'est l'idee?
RicoElectrico (2016-01-06 18:15:43+00:00): "Uzupełnienie" - na dobrą metę tak można nazwać większą część zestawów zmian, także myślę że opis jest zbyt ogólny ;>
Lepiej by było: "Przesunięcie punktów adresowych w dokładniejsze położenie"
Сергій Дубик (2016-01-07 19:02:35+00:00): Повернув назад. Це зворотня зупинка 6-го. (http://www.eway.in.ua/ua/cities/ternopil/routes/20). Мабуть, це зупинка на вимогу.
Сергій Дубик (2016-01-07 18:53:51+00:00): Привіт! Адреса на POI не потрібна якщо є на будівлі. Є зміст додавати хіба addr:door (№ офісу/кімнати), addr:full (рядок повної адреси), level (поверх)…
woodpeck_repair (2016-01-06 16:55:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36407926 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed mechanical edit
woodpeck (2016-01-06 17:00:27+00:00): Please stop making these types of edits. "Gardening" is ok as long as you actually look at the individual objects you're editing. Loading a large number of objects through Taginfo/Overpass and mass-changing one property is not ok. A number of objects changed in this changeset have tags that anyone looking at them with a pair of eyes would have fixed ("elevation=33;34") - a lawnmower type of edit like yours doesn't improve the situation, it worsens it because it now looks as if "someone as edited this thing recently so it can't be too bad".
maraf24 (2016-01-07 23:43:17+00:00): Netto warto oznaczyć tagiem shop=supermarket
user_5359 (2016-01-10 08:45:04+00:00): Question to way 389861068: What ist the meaning of Isenschnibber=Feldscheune?
maxerickson (2016-01-06 21:20:19+00:00): ~1000 meters appears to have been more correct than ~300. A good source for US airport information is the FAA:

https://nfdc.faa.gov/nfdcApps/services/airportLookup/airportDisplay.jsp?airportId=nv65

There is a geographic search available here:

https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/airportdata_5010/

(Under "Location(s) Selection Form", I usually search by State and County, which returns a manageable number of airports).

It also seems that the FAA identifier has been changed to NV65.
maxerickson (2016-01-06 21:24:04+00:00): Sorry for the double message, after searching on County/State, the interesting information is at the "Airport Contact Information" link under Reports.
Aleks-Berlin (2016-01-10 20:02:37+00:00): http://www.gcmap.com/airport/DRA
Elevation:	3314 ft (1010 m)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Desert Rock Airport
Elevation AMSL  1,010 ft / 308 m

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury,_Nevada
Elevation  3,789 ft (1,155 m)

==> ok you are right, and wikipedia is wrong.
I will go to ele=1010m again.
maxerickson (2016-01-10 21:43:09+00:00): I'm sure that gcmap and Wikipedia both got their information from the FAA database I linked, it's just that at some point someone involved with putting the data into Wikipedia thought that the 1010 meters needed conversion to meters.

I think for US airports there is no reason to use any source other than the FAA, unless that source has clearly added or corrected information (here gcmap just replicates the FAA data, and Wikipedia had mangled it).
letihu (2016-02-01 17:15:31+00:00): Schöne Wege, nur leider fehlten die Verbindungen :-(
chris66 (2016-01-07 12:08:13+00:00): That is very weird tagging. 

And source Google Maps is not allowed in OSM !!
maraf24 (2016-01-08 00:09:36+00:00): Nie wygląda to na szpital.
MikeLBN (2016-01-08 20:06:03+00:00): Jest to Szpital Leczena jednego Dnia.
Działa od ponad 1 roku.
Budynek po gruntownej modernizacji.
2 nowoczesne sale operacyjne i Oddział Leczenia Jednego Dnia.
Odebrany przez Sanepid.
Największy w woj. lubelskim kontrakt z NFZ w ramach na operacje zaćmy, chirurgii naczyniowej, ortopedii, chirurgii ogólnej.
maraf24 (2016-01-08 20:11:04+00:00): Czyli jest czynny 24/7 ?
MikeLBN (2016-01-08 20:27:58+00:00): Nie, bo nie jest to Szpital z Ostrym Dyżurem.
Są 3 rodzaje Szpitali:
1. z ostrym dyżurem.
2. operacje planowe bez ostrego dyżuru (do 3 dni pobytu)
3. Leczenie Jednego Dnia - przyjęcie i wypis tego samego dnia.
To jest właśnie Szpital Leczenia Jednego Dnia. Można sprawdzić w rejestrze Wojewody Lubelskiego
maraf24 (2016-01-08 20:59:08+00:00): To raczej nie jest szpital w znaczeniu używanym w OSM.
maraf24 (2016-01-08 21:01:49+00:00): I raczej nie jest to szpital wg polskiej ustawy, bo jasno ona określa, że świadczenia mają być udzielane całodobowo.
MikeLBN (2016-01-08 22:21:15+00:00): Prosze dokładnie przeczytać ustawę. Jest to szpital.
Jeżeli nie był by to szpital nie miał by wpisu do Rejestru Wojewody jako Podmiot Leczniczy, który wykonuje:
1 - Stacjonarne i całodobowe świadczenie zdrowotne - szpitalne
Oddział Leczenia Jednego Dnia nie musi być czynny całodobowo (VIII cz kodu resortowego: 4670)
Prosze sobie sprawdzić:
https://rpwdl.csioz.gov.pl/RPM/Search
Wybrać Wojewodę Lubelskiego i wpisać nr księgi rejestrowej: 000000021609.
Jest wpisany pod tym adresem szpital, blok operacyjny, izba przyjęć, oddział.
MikeLBN (2016-01-08 22:23:14+00:00): A tak w ogóle to proszę podać ustawę gdzie szpital ma definicję że ma być czynny całodobowo.
Sugeruje dokładnie przeczytać ustawę o świadczeniach gwarantowanych z zakresu Leczenia Szpitalnego.
MikeLBN (2016-01-08 22:25:25+00:00): W ww. ustawie z zakresu Leczenia Szpitalnego oraz zarządzenia Prezesa NFZ wymagania min. dla takiego Szpitala to:
min oddział czynny 3x tyg. po min 5h w tym 1 raz w godz. 8-15 i jeden raz w godz. 14-20
MikeLBN (2016-01-08 22:26:58+00:00): Tak jak pisałem wcześniej:
Są 3 tryby hospitalizacji:
1. Hospitalizacja (24/7)
2. Hospitalizacja planowa (24/7)
3. Leczenie Jednego Dnia (max 24h)
MikeLBN (2016-01-08 22:28:05+00:00): Za każdym razem jest to z definicji Szpital.
i takie też ma mieć obowiązkowe ubezpieczneie OC - liczone jak dla Szpitala
MikeLBN (2016-01-08 22:33:32+00:00): VI cz. kodu resortowego
1 - Stacjonarne i całodobowe świadczenie zdrowotne - szpitalne

IX cz. kodu resortowego:
HC.1.2 Leczenie stacjonarne .jednego dnia.

VIII cz. kodu resortowego:
4670 Oddział leczenia jednego dnia
SomeoneElse (2022-08-08 14:51:06+00:00): So you're sure that Jessie Bennett Wash Hole here is valid and exists? :)
Stereo (2016-01-06 13:20:17+00:00): Danke! Was war da falsch? Hatte ich dieses Stück in der Relation vergessen?
Gehrke (2016-01-06 13:21:14+00:00): Ja, musste noch aus einer PLZ-Relation entfernt werden.
Aleks-Berlin (2016-01-07 18:15:20+00:00): revert
Hjart (2016-01-06 13:38:24+00:00): Folkekirken er luthersk (lutheran), mere end protestant.
agdamsbo (2016-01-06 14:58:35+00:00): Helt enig. Min fejl!
mueschel (2016-01-08 22:23:07+00:00): Hi,
(sorry, I don't speak polish). Could you explain what the cryptic information on way 389845600 and several others is supposed to be?
Thanks, Jan
Rzezimierz (2016-01-09 08:18:00+00:00): Your comment is a cryptic information :) Are you talking about the comment to the changeset?
mueschel (2016-01-09 12:02:39+00:00): Hi, i wanted to say that there are the 20 keys on this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389845600
All these keys appear in the OSM database for the first time and are unknown to me.
Rzezimierz (2016-01-09 12:49:09+00:00): Oh, sorry about that. I'm importing currently Polish administrative boundaries info from SHP file and merging it with OSM data piece-by-piece. These are just the tags used to describe polyline in that SHP file. I must have missed it, it should not be here. Thank for keeping an eye on things and have a nice day!