piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-13 16:11:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136059221 where the changeset comment is: Reverting MAPS.ME garbage such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10893535607 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7125
SomeoneElse (2019-04-27 21:39:41+00:00): Hello,
This changeset seems to have introduced lots of duplication - see the note at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1755995 .
Also, what's the source of this data?  Under what licence was it made available to OSM?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-05-04 10:40:25+00:00): As there was no reply here I've reverted this changeset, except where another mapper has updated the previous addition with other info.

Of those, I've fixed a number of obvious duplicates:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1755115
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69506880#map=19/52.94656/-1.14653&layers=N
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227913

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227993/history
was a duplicate of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4821534221
but delete the latter, since the former had more info
I fixed that in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69871228

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402228497/history
was a duplicate of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4587550634

Potential problem ones remaining:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227929/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69504674#map=9/53.9847/-2.0427

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402228507/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69372896#map=9/53.9213/-2.0857

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402228507/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69372896

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227987/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69672462#map=7/46.906/19.936

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227940/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69504674#map=9/53.9847/-2.0427

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227996/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69204029#map=19/53.74213/-0.33794&layers=N
(that looks like an obvious duplicate but is not local to me)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227988/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69672462

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227945/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69372896
(that looks like an obvious duplicate but is not local to me)
SomeoneElse (2019-05-04 10:41:05+00:00): For completeness, my "revert" changeset was https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69871285 .
Famlam (2019-04-13 14:09:09+00:00): En het natuurmuseum is in 2018 verhuisd en hernoemd, dus die heb ik ook hernoemd (depot) en als disused gemarkeerd.
eggie (2019-04-13 15:09:57+00:00): Graag je edits beschrijven.
water = pond zal niet correct zijn.
Niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
De naam van het water hoort op de waterway en zal daar al op staan zo te zien.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-13 15:15:58+00:00): Probeer je eerst in te lezen. Je edits worden teruggezet.
eggie (2019-04-13 15:23:36+00:00): reverted door  Wijzigingenset #69179992
eggie (2019-04-13 15:31:15+00:00): Wanneer je in Nederland begint met mappen .. gebruik van de PDOK luchtfoto op de achtergrond en niet de BING. Die ligt verschoven.
De een enkele toevoeging .. beschrijf wat je doet en dan uploaden. 
Maak eerst voor je zelf een plan... Werk op één plek. 
Niet te hooi en te gras, want bij een revert ben je alles weer kwijt en dat zou jammer zijn.
MVG,
Eggie
Jakob48 (2019-04-18 17:20:02+00:00): Hallo dktue,

du hast aus Versehen einige aS-Relationen auf Schweizer Hoheitgebiet gelöscht. Bitte die Änderungen der betroffenen Relationen zurücknehmen.

Jakob48
bora can (2019-04-13 14:16:10+00:00): Belediyenin CBS'si kaynaktır.
eggie (2019-04-13 15:53:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap Nederland. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
celsius11 (2019-04-13 14:45:54+00:00): dann bitte mal eine sinnvollen Namen für diese Fläche überlegen! ich überlasse das gerne des Lokalen Spezialisten. Aber als Kartennutzer kann ich nur sagen, das ich huer zurerst sehtr gestutzt hatte, was das hier für eine große "wiese" sein soll. Jemand, der nicht weiß wo der Tagebau liegt (wie ich ich) wird so zumindest verwirrt ;-) aber ich überlasse gerne den lokalen aktiven hier eine bessere Lösung sinnvoll wäre vielleicht vor allem ein anderes Atributt - neben Namen mit klarer kurzer Erklärung, der im Kartenbild sichtbar ist. Damit Schluss hier. ;-) Grüße in die Niederlausitz.
PT-53 (2019-04-13 15:02:55+00:00): Hallo celsius11,
seit wann hat jede Fläche einen Namen????
streckenkundler (2019-04-13 15:17:52+00:00): Die Fläche hat schlicht und ergreifend keinen Namen... Fertig... Der Wunschtraum Cottbusser Ostsee existiert nocht nicht und ob der bis 2025 wie geplant existieren wird, steht auch in den Sternen, von dem, was ich seit der Wende als Gebietskenner hier beobachte, dauern die Prozesse alle bedeutend länger und es wird anders als man sich da gedacht hat... Wie ich per PN schon schrieb, eigendlich würde ich mir eine Bearbeitungssperre für das Gebiet wünschen, wenn das ginge... 

Es gibt ein Objekt, das das hinreichend beschreibt (mit Start und Ende) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570511025
mer ist erst mal für die nächsten 2-3 Jahre (oder einer in dem Zeitraum aktualisierten Luftbildquelle) nicht nötig...

Sven
streckenkundler (2019-04-13 15:31:39+00:00): Ach ja,
selbst natural=grassland ist eher ein Kompromiss... es kommt dem am ehesten nahe... vorher war mal natrual=heath... (vgl. History)
Für solche Bergbaufolgeflächen gibt es schlicht und ergreifen keine 100%ig passende Keys... Das siehst du auch daran, daß angrenzend diverse Flächen nicht gemappt sind. können sie auch nicht... Luftbild stimmt  nicht, Besuch vor Ort geht oft nicht (Sperrbereiche!)
streckenkundler (2019-04-13 16:07:58+00:00): Nein, weder brownfield noch greenfield passen hier, das wären auch Kompromisse, in meinen Augen sogar wesendlich schlechtere als natural=grassland...

Das da durch die begonnene Flutung etwas Wasser da ist, stelle ich aich nicht in Abrede, es gibt nur keine valide Möglichkeit, die derzeitige Ausdehung zu prüfen und durch die Flutung veränder sich das ständig.

Ähnlich ist es mit dort mit der Ausdehnung des Sperrbereiches...In der Ecke ist es kaum möglich, den Sperrbereich abzugrenzen. Ein access=no an irgend ein Obkekt zu plastern ist wie gewollt und nicht gekonnt...

In anderen Ecken habe ich diese Bereiche schon erfasst...https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584875543
Da war die Erfassung möglich.

Sven
Hjart (2019-04-22 14:16:21+00:00): Bemærk at vindmøllen er markeret 35 m nord for denne position
Allroads (2019-04-14 23:22:38+00:00): Hoi, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2719211701

Waarom heb je deze node verschoven?
Nu mist er een adres aan de Herculesstraat

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69179094

highway=bus_stop is de paal op het platform, met het verkeersbord er op, de bekende zwarte bus,op een witte ondergrond, uit de R.V.V., aangevende dat het een bushalte is, hier staat het er net naast, ook is public_transport=platform als polygon ingetekend, als area met area=yes, de weg over het platform is highway=platform, m.a.w. het was correct.
dmlu (2019-05-01 22:16:22+00:00): Hi, since you selected “review requested”, I have looked at your changes:

Since you moved the “Cour des Comptes” to the new location, you should have deleted the old information from the building instead of changing the address (since the POI doesn’t physically exist at this place anymore).

Thanks a lot for participating in OSM! :)
eggie (2019-04-13 15:57:30+00:00): Dag Jopie.. Alle gebouwen in Nederland zijn precies ingemeten en zijn geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. het is dus beter om niet aan gebouwen te sleutelen. Het gaat om het maaiveld en niet het dak.
Ik pas de omtrek weer aan naar de data van het Kadaster.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-13 15:58:30+00:00): Gebouw hersteld
mavl (2019-04-18 15:52:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, что означает "яндекс" в комментариях к вашим пакетам правок? Вы берёте данные с Яндекс.карт?  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
dinarhasan (2019-04-18 16:11:11+00:00): Здравствуйте, конкретно 36 микрорайон взял отсюда информацию http://karkas-pro.ru/proekty/g-surgut/mikrorajon-36.html, и у застройщика спрашивал, они ли строят.
dinarhasan (2019-04-18 16:11:43+00:00): яндекс в смысле поисковик яндекс. не яндекс карты.
dinarhasan (2019-04-18 16:14:18+00:00): вообще была информация, что будет автовокзал где-то здесь. но теперь ясно, что строят жилой микрорайон.
mavl (2019-04-18 16:23:17+00:00): Спасибо. Просто напомню, что в OpenStreetMap нельзя переносить информацию из источников, защищённых авторским правом, без явного разрешения.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms  
  
Пожалуйста, пишите вместо "яндекс" какой-нибудь текст, который описывает ваши изменения. Примеры можно почитать в статье [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments]
dinarhasan (2019-04-18 16:26:52+00:00): хорошо.
Shaya K (2019-04-13 15:28:41+00:00): I added some buildings and slightly moved a road. #ssnc19 ;)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-04-14 12:13:07+00:00): quando uma calçada é rente a pista, você não precisa colocar uma nova linha, melhor usar sidewalk https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
DressyPear4 (2019-04-13 16:42:56+00:00): Ruas e casas definem uma área urbana, não é necessário adicionar uma área informando isso.
geoecampo gmail com (2019-04-14 13:04:01+00:00): Valeu, ok
Baloo Uriza (2019-04-15 23:12:56+00:00): Which imagery were you using?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69180401
mvviveka (2019-07-10 07:09:20+00:00): Hi, Thanks for looking into the edit. The edit here was done based on the bing aerial imagery.
Adamant1 (2019-06-04 15:14:49+00:00): How is mapping a commercial area over what is clearly retail and residential a "landuse fix"? It's pretty clear at this point that your just using County GIS imports to "fill in" the map. Without having to put any work into it or actually reviewing what your doing. As I've seen you make similar obvious mistakes, that were never fixed, all over the place and mostly served to make the map look "complete." Instead of imparting any, actually useful, information to map viewers. 

In this particular case, it would have been way better to either just leave a blank spot on the map or if it had to be "filled in" you really easily could have just mapped the landuse properly, by hand. 

This is a clear case where using the SCCGIS file to "fix" something was a miss use of it and importing in general. Along with it just being completely and utterly pointless do it that way. 

It would be good if you actually "fixed" it this time. Or if you won't, I will. Whichever. Also, next time just do it by hand. Either that or at least check the import before you save it to the map to make sure it's correct. Instead of just adding bad data. The GIS file isn't infallible and it's a waste of time to needlessly import bad information that could have been hand mapped correctly just as easily.  

Thanks, 

Adamant1
stevea (2019-06-04 19:40:46+00:00): OSM Community:  This user has been told numerous times by both me directly and the DWG to not contact me, yet he repeatedly insists on doing so in private missive, Notes and changeset comments.  I consider this harassment (everybody should, as it is), especially with his non-specific complaint in this comment:  it does not properly detail of what he believes is "bad" (i.e. WHICH commercial area? ; there are several in the changeset and they are all asserted to be correct).  I will not endlessly "chase my tail" like this.

This user cannot communicate without complaint, false assertions, and an air of superiority and arrogance about data which he has little or no knowledge (he is not local, while I am).  He remains pedantic and overtly nitpicking over what amounts to nothing at all:  his sole purpose seems to be to annoy and bully.  Not only is he both ineffective at this and flagrantly violates not only OSM's tenets of decorum, but those of good social graces and effective elocution as well.

I invite the community to ask this user to cease and desist this and his other harassment as you see it for what it is.  I will not be the target of his intimidation and repeated, continuing abuse.  Adam does not correct or improve the map (here), he simply throws firebombs into sub-communities (or targets specific individuals) and secretly thrills at any consequences of his chaotic behavior.  I refuse to give him any joy in this sad activity and so should the rest of us:  don't feed the troll(s).

While I would have preferred to simply ignore Adam (as I have for several weeks after going No Contact with him; yet he persisted in repeatedly contacting and provoking me), I am saddened to have to say such things in the public forum of a changeset comment.  I do not wish to harm our community with what appears to be a continuing "feud" of sorts, however this needs to be said.  I know of no other way to say it than to say it.
Adamant1 (2019-06-04 21:50:09+00:00): know one in the DWG told us not to contact each other. They said not to argue and be concise about things. That was it. There was no issue when I sent you a message a few days ago about some picnic tables you wrongly tagged. So I'm not sure what the issue is now, but whatever. Thanks for the needless insults etc. 

I only sent you a message in this case because it was something I had edited originally. Which you had overridden with the bad imported data and I didn't want to be accused of edit waring or something by editing it without contacting you about it first. As that's what the DWG/community says to do. There's zero reason for the insults, accusations, etc. just because I asked you about it. You could have just fixed the issue, as it's pretty easy to see by just looking at the map in the center of town, and gone on with your day. That's exactly what happened with the picnic tables. I'm not sure what's so different about this. I'll just edit it myself though. I'm 100% fine doing that in this instance and all others. No big deal. Really.
stevea (2019-06-04 22:16:48+00:00): It is patently false that Adam was not asked by OSM officials to not engage with me:  see his user Talk page, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/User_talk:Adamant1#Temporary_block_on_1_May_2019 where Wiki Administrator Minh asks him this, and says such engagement now "is the responsibility of administrators and/or the DWG."  What Adam says above as "that's what the DWG/community says to do" is 100% false, especially in this exact case.

Minh continues, that if "you contribute further to tensions, a more permanent block may be considered."  An inflammatory non-specific complaint such as this (again, WHICH landuse=commercial polygons?!) is PRECISELY Adam contributing to further tensions.  This is a simple, undeniable truth.

Additionally, _I myself_ have asked Adam REPEATEDLY to not engage with me, privately and publicly, NUMEROUS TIMES as I consider any contact with him to be MOST unwelcome.  That should be enough, but he doesn't seem to understand this (even after screaming at me "DO IT!" regarding me going No Contact).  Yet he continues to scratch whatever itch he has and persists in harassing me.  Conversely, I want absolutely nothing to do with Adam, yet he effectively forces me to call him out like this here.  Again, I am saddened this is happening in OSM.

I wish to completely disengage with Adam and have done my very best to do so, especially over the last month-plus.  I hereby request the assistance of the DWG and the greater OSM community to recognize his behavior as repeated harassment and abuse, pure and simple.  Leave me alone!  If Adam wishes to map what he actually knows, then MAP!  Quit with the verbal rock-throwing already!  It helps nobody and damages the goodwill in our project.
Adamant1 (2019-06-05 01:12:42+00:00): "see his user Talk page"

Where where Wiki Administrator Minh said we should take a break from communicating with each other as a cooling off. Nothing there says no contact ever again. 

"Additionally, _I myself_ have asked Adam REPEATEDLY to not engage with me, privately and publicly, NUMEROUS TIMES"

And then you repeatedly contacted about about edits I made. Including an edit to a landuse=forest area recently. After the message by Minh that you also received and after you told me not to contact you. You can't have it both ways where you complain about my edits that you had nothing to do with originally, but then I can't contact you about specific edits of mine that you modified. 

I have zero issue with leaving you alone, but it has to be mutual, not one sided, and you can't wrongly edit things I've mapped in the mean time. Trust me when I say I don't want to have any contact with you. I've said as much repeatedly. You've repeatedly gone back on your side of it though. I agree with iandees that you just get defensive about things. And you would have had an issue with whatever I would have done in this case, contacting you or just editing it without asking about it first, because that's just how you act. 

Like I said, I could care less about having anything to do with you. I only contacted you because I didn't want to be accused of editing waring or something. I'm 100% fine just doing the edits and being done with it though. Which is what I'm going to do from now on. I'm done with this discussion. It's completely useless.
stevea (2019-06-05 01:30:34+00:00): _I_ have said don't contact me.  Stop this.  Stop this now.  This virtually constant provocation will not be tolerated.  It is harassment.  it is abuse.

As Adam says he has "zero issue leaving me alone," then doesn't, all can see how disingenuous he is.

When he says "gone back," it is only to defend myself against provable untruths and actual slander.  Any honorable person can, should and will do this.  I refrained during the last several weeks, but his provocative behavior is absolutely beyond the pale.  Ian saying I get defensive may be true, but there is nothing wrong with defending oneself when attacked as Adam attacks, especially as I have held my tongue for weeks now.

Does ANYbody see this troll for what he is?  DWG:  Help!

"That's just how you act" is another slanderous provocation:   OTHER people in this project do not say such things about me and my proper decorum in this project for the last decade, only you do, and simply tossing firebombs by saying so doesn't make it so.  Be gone with you!

Adam SAYS he's "done with this discussion."  Yet, watch, he WILL provoke yet again.  Just watch.  I sincerely hope to be proven wrong.

Map.  Map well.
Supaplex (2019-08-09 15:15:19+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DressyPear4 (2019-04-13 16:38:27+00:00): Olá, você adicionou uma área de mata muito grande, note que ela cobre várias edificações o que não é correto.
Evite grudar e cruzar áreas com vias.
maraf24 (2019-04-14 07:46:48+00:00): Wycofane - błędna zmiana proposed na trunk.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-04-26 22:38:42+00:00): Hi angys, I have made minor geometric modifications to this natural=water polygon https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/683564517 so it doesn't cross the highway around. Have a look, if my edits are not appropriate according to your local understanding of the surrounding environment please let me know.
M0MTM (2019-04-13 19:56:49+00:00): Das Landgericht ist weiterhin dort.
ZB Presseartikel:
https://m.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/kriminalitaet/konstanz-mafia-prozess-findet-in-alter-kantine-statt-15713287.html
Separater Hinweis: Die beiden Gebäude östlich von Nr. 1  sind abgerissen worden
Chrysopras (2019-04-14 06:27:06+00:00): Danke für die Erklärung!

Ich habe das fixme vom Landgericht demnach wieder entfernt (in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69193965).

Zu den abgerissenen Gebäuden: Ich bin nicht 100% sicher, welche Gebäude Du meinst, und will natürlich nicht das falsche Gebäude entfernen  ;–). Eines, das auch nach den neuesten Luftbildern (und Maps4BW) nicht mehr existiert, habe ich auf demolished gesetzt, sodass es nicht mehr gerendet werden sollte.

Muss noch ein Gebäude weg? Dann bitte irgendwie genau bezeichnen, z.B. über Hinweise-Marker auf Karte. Danke!
M0MTM (2019-04-14 11:36:23+00:00): Habe beide Gebäude als existiert nicht gemeldet
M0MTM (2019-04-14 11:36:23+00:00): Habe beide Gebäude als existentiert nicht gemeldet
Chrysopras (2019-04-15 08:18:43+00:00): Danke! Kollege berjk hat sich schon darum gekümmert, siehe den Kommentar in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1744829.
skyper (2020-02-18 16:24:14+00:00): Hallo tstiele

Willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe eine Frage:
Woher hast Du die Informationen über den Bachverlauf ?

Grüße skyper
tstiele (2020-02-21 11:36:11+00:00): Hallo Skyper,
ist ja nun ne Weile her. Soweit ich mich erinnere, hab ich dort n Spaziergang gemacht und mich gewundert. Dann hab ichs mit Karte und Foto abgeglichen.
Dass ich, wie's jetzt ist, den Weg nach der Kurve in den Bach gelegt hätte, kann ich mir nur schwer vorstellen.
Grüße Thomas
skyper (2020-02-21 14:05:30+00:00): Hey Thomas.

Ich habe den Bach an Maps4BW angepasst. Im Wald wird es mit Luftbildern schwierig.
In deinem Änderungssatz war keine Quelle angegeben, deshalb die Nachfrage. Wenn Du dir sicher bist, dass er vorher richtig eingetragen war und Maps4BW falsch ist, setzte ich gerne zurück.

Ciao skyper
Hjart (2019-04-26 13:34:05+00:00): Denne her befinder sig 65 m fra det fysiske toilet
eggie (2019-04-13 20:01:59+00:00): Dag nathan, 
Je hebt de school opnieuw toegevoegd, maar dat heb je enige tijd geleden al gedaan. Ik heb de node weer verwijderd.

MVG,
Eggie
bxl-forever (2019-06-02 13:13:30+00:00): Hello,
There seems to be something strange with this changeset, especially around Place de l’Église/Kerkplein in Berchem.  Also with subsequent changesets (69182557, 69182656, 69195171) touching this area.
I may understand that you might have intended drawing an area around the square, but with road-alike tags and by deleting the existing road.
I will try to fix this because we have routing errors in this area.
Al+ (2019-06-07 22:12:30+00:00): Hi, I'm sorry if I messed things up,  my intention was to make out clear that it's in fact a large open space,  but with kind of a driving in/out direction. I hope you'll be able to fix it.
bxl-forever (2019-06-08 16:02:30+00:00): Hi and thanks for writing back.
Don’t worry too much, it was a good idea to map that place as an area.  I could fix that easily to keep the area while having routable roads across it..
Keep adding stuff to OSM, it’s nice to have more people here.
Hjart (2019-04-26 13:33:48+00:00): Dette toilet var markeret 40 m fra den fysiske position hvor der i forvejen var markeret et toilet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312514029
Jonas Hansen (2019-04-26 13:38:28+00:00): Ja, det skulle ikke have været indsat.
aceman444 (2019-04-25 18:19:52+00:00): Zdravim, aky zmysel ma bicycle=yes (aj ked v popise zase tvrdite "practical") na tomto malom priechode pre chodcov? Tam urcite ziadna znacka nebude, aky by asi mala vyznam na par metrov.