piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2019-12-06 07:26:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
skquinn (2019-12-10 03:07:07+00:00): (And obviously some other changes I had forgotten about)
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:44:26+00:00): Hi greenmapper,
your recent changesets have left behind several errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-60.28148&lat=-3.20906&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

Guido
wireguy (2019-12-06 13:51:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM!   I unglued the connected road (Davenport) from the wooded relation.  Keep up the mapping.
mapman44 (2019-12-18 03:31:40+00:00): In this changeset that you edited, along Northeast Williams Canyon Road there is a large landuse area that is untagged. Please check it and add the correct tag. Thanks.
hauke-stieler (2020-12-19 14:31:02+00:00): Auch wenn es schon etwas her ist, zu deiner Frage, wie das eingetragen wird: Der tag "oneway=yes" war tatsächlich korrekt, auch, wenn ein typischer "Einbahnstraße"-Pfeil fehlt. Siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3DDE:267
Habs entsprechend angepasst und auch den "traffic_sign"-tag ergänzt.

Gruß
Hauke
Adrion (2019-12-06 03:17:57+00:00): As a local, I can tell you for sure that the natural=peak node you added in Lewes (node 7037229669) should not be there. For your first changeset, you have made a large number of changes over a huge area - are you sure you know about all these things better than locals? I would suggest starting on a modest scale mapping things you know from your own experience. I would hate to put you off from contributing, I'm just trying to help!  All the best.
southglos (2019-12-06 00:13:31+00:00): Bristol City Centre and the new Severn bridge as peak=natural ??
ndm (2019-12-06 00:21:08+00:00): A lot of Bristol suburbs have now been duplicated as peaks.

Can someone please revert - or I'll do so when I can
SomeoneElse (2019-12-06 03:06:12+00:00): I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78023496 .  If anyone sees any problems with that, or any other problems that need reverting, please let me know.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
DaveF (2019-12-08 21:42:23+00:00): Please don't attach polygons to the centre line of roads. When a gate is added to the polygon's boundary to represent an entrance it will also insert the gate on the road messing up routing software.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2019-12-06 00:20:36+00:00): York Minster is not natural it is man-made, also 72m is its height above ground level not its elevation above sea level
AndersAndersson (2019-12-06 06:29:27+00:00): I doubt there is a peak in the tunnel under water.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7037242822
Spinnaker Tower is not a peak.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7037242801

Is all changes like this, then I think this changeset should be reverted.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-06 23:24:05+00:00): @Yorvik Prestigitator , @AndersAndersson - this user is an occasional vandal who uses one of a few different accounts to add fake "peaks" to OSM.  They've been blocked before and have just been blocked again: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3323 and I've reverted these changes.  If you spot any similar problems in the future you can let OSM's Data Working Group know by emailing data@osmfoundation.org or by reporting them via the "report" button.
BlaueBlüte (2020-01-10 06:29:04+00:00): I don’t really see where on the Brooklyn Bridge “_wide expanses_ of hard surface are provided for pedestrians to walk” [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian?uselang=en with emphasis added] … “highway=footway” or “highway=path” might be more appropriate.
jmapb (2020-01-27 04:24:58+00:00): I agree, BlaueBlüte -- I've just reverted to footway with appropriate bicycle tags, changeset 80117201
Warin61 (2020-01-11 23:51:35+00:00): Hi,

What information does the route=power relation give? Would not the lines give you that information?

And what is ref=KTS-SBY1? And where does it come from+
tonyf1 (2024-08-06 05:25:08+00:00): KTS-SBY1 is a 66kV line from Keilor Terminal Station to Sunbury Zone Substation, one of two, the other KTS-SBY2. I suppose it has a similar role as a highway as a relation of road sections. I think the name is marked on the poles but I haven't checked yet. You say "where does it come from" as is it a copyright document? Good question.
Warin61 (2024-08-06 09:34:56+00:00): Have a read of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Power_routing_proposal
tonyf1 (2024-08-08 22:44:30+00:00): Thanks Warin for pointing this proposal out. We havent heard from wasgij in 4 years so are unlikely to get a reply now. Can you be more specific on what you are questioning?
Warin61 (2024-08-09 09:09:26+00:00): Not a 'power line' person but I came across this 'route' .. was interested but could not reconcile my concept of 'route' with power lines. 

The KTS SBY are abbreviations ... be nice to know if there were some way of confirming the ref values given. But this is a distraction from the 'route' issue.
tonyf1 (2024-08-17 00:44:50+00:00): Not sure what you are questioning about 'route' but Ive looked at the ref values around Belgrave Zone Substation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159814853 ref=BGE. BGE is fed by 2 66kV feeders from East Rowville Terminal Station, ERTS and Ferntree Gully Zone Substation FGY. The lines are ref= ERTS-BGE and BGE-FGY.  Re confirming the ref values, I found a FGY-BGE label on a power pole just north of the substation. That seems more likely to be correct than the reverse BGV-FGY on OSM considering which way the power is likely to flow. I also found FGY and ERTS labels on the switchgear that the 2 lines connect to. In short, there are enough labels physically attached to electricity hardware to confirm the ref values. Photos sent by PM to Warin.
Warin61 (2024-08-17 10:32:07+00:00): Routes entered by this changeset;

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6969948

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6969949

The proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Power_routing_proposal goes into why 'route=power' is not a good idea.
nevw (2019-12-07 06:45:58+00:00): Hi
you seemed to have accidentally shifted a parking isle node.
Are the rest of your edits as desired?
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=78021154
Possums Playhouse was a laundromat and bus stops are moved.
Are you able to correct those in error or do you want me to revert the changes?
nevw (2019-12-14 04:10:13+00:00): no response - reverted.
viloan (2019-12-06 01:28:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-12-06 06:17:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the new highway with the existing highways.
solmaps2 (2019-12-07 04:28:33+00:00): big props on adjusting this fellow mapper, may i ask for your opinion if let's say i were to continue tracing homes with satellite imagery is there any objection to it friend?
solmaps2 (2019-12-07 04:30:33+00:00): in the meantime i shall just  continue on with it , feel free to write back please
iandees (2019-12-07 04:37:01+00:00): Yes please continue improving the map. Enjoy!
PlaneMad (2021-02-16 06:01:54+00:00): Amazing work mapping around Golaghat!
viloan (2019-12-06 04:15:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-12-06 06:02:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Claudius Henrichs (2019-12-06 11:00:00+00:00): Yes, station=subway is a reference to the railway infrastructure and not the location. You can add location=underground for subterranean or location=overground for elevated stations. But this is some evolving tagging still.
Thanks for restoring the station=subway tags
JJIglesias (2019-12-06 13:48:17+00:00): Slds. He revertido tus cambios pues alterastes varios cruces en Cochabamba. Antes de editar sin conocimiento. Favor seguir los tutoriales:
http://learnosm.org/es/
user_5359 (2019-12-06 06:01:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Road–Runner (2019-12-08 00:24:29+00:00): Das ist aber nicht der Name des Geschäfts, sondern nur was dort verkauft wird? Bitte nur den Namen eintragen.
Gilt auch für:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207025891
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210965762
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528182589

Hier besteht schon ein Punkt für das Gasthaus (der auch schon als Restaurant attributiert wurde).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207010155
user_5359 (2019-12-06 19:09:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:55:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:55:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:55:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2019-12-06 15:47:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были взяты адресные данные?
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
mueschel (2019-12-08 18:37:13+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You used some tags like "no telpon" in your edits.
This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the menues in the editor should be used.

Please have a look to the documented tags in the wiki and use only these - only well-defined tags can be understood by other mappers and can be shown on maps and in applications.


Jan
ralley (2019-12-06 08:10:27+00:00): This should be layer=-1 if it is a tunnel under the surface, layer=1 is above.  Also please dont put descriptions in the name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78030169
ralley (2019-12-06 17:30:33+00:00): I've cleaned this up as best I can
Discostu36 (2019-12-06 07:04:22+00:00): Esri, nicht Bing
Nosyrin (2019-12-06 15:44:51+00:00): Не рано?
Nosyrin (2019-12-06 15:46:21+00:00): Перекрытие будет ОТ ПАНИНА, а не от Урицкого. Урицкого-Панина закрывается в следующем году.
avegad (2019-12-09 10:34:52+00:00): Спасибо!
Nosyrin (2019-12-09 10:38:08+00:00): Я уже поправил руками
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
nevw (2019-12-07 06:38:04+00:00): Hi
I adjusted some of you tags to better suite your business and other changes to conform to format.
I don't think shop=supermarket is suitable...
" Supermarket – a large store with groceries and other items "
shop=billiard_tables would be ideal but no uses in OpenStreetMap so I used shop=sports
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
I also re-formatted the street name, phone and opening hours.
maro21 (2019-12-06 19:14:12+00:00): Wiem, że to może mylące, ale height= to tutaj to nie jest wysokość iglicy, tylko wysokość budynku dla tagowania 3D. Właściwa wysokość jest w pozostałych elementach building:part. Taka wartość jest podana dlatego, że gdyby nie była podana, to renderery budynków 3D przypiszą domyślną wysokość, to jest chyba 10 metrów. Po twojej zmianie iglica będzie miała dwa razy 90 metrów i będzie stała na białym prosotpadłościanie.
Wcześniej było tak: https://i.postimg.cc/dtYzrPX5/iglica.png
Ten element który edytowałeś to ten zaznaczony niebieską strzałką. To taki pseudobudynek, żeby można tam było dodać nazwę, linki itp.
Na razie nie cofam, ale za parę dni będziesz mógł zobaczyć jak to wygląda na https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.1078198&lon=17.0752129&zoom=20&camera.theta=57.089
maro21 (2019-12-10 22:50:47+00:00): Wygląda trochę inaczej niż myślałem że będzie, ale i tak nie tak jak powinna ;)
https://i.postimg.cc/s2Sjn2xR/iglica2.png
ralley (2019-12-06 08:11:00+00:00): Why layer=-2 and not -1 ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78030522
ralley (2019-12-06 17:21:21+00:00): Fixed by NelsonArea
mavl (2020-02-21 16:55:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
chnav (2020-01-13 15:22:27+00:00): Fully reverted. 
Mass edits using wrong mapping practice. These are T-junctions, not Y- or V-junctions.
Pellissippie (2020-01-13 22:54:18+00:00): I responded here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78033345
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
chnav (2020-01-13 15:25:09+00:00): Fully reverted. 
Mass edits using wrong mapping practice. These are T-junctions, not Y- or V-junctions.
Pellissippie (2020-01-13 22:42:37+00:00): Thanks for the comment. I made these edits because carrying the split through the intersection to form a V is a fairly common mapping practice elsewhere in the world when changing between a single and dual carriageway. This practice is also documented here: https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/#merging-after-intersection and in my opinion it helps with routing — rather than saying "turn right" then immediately "turn left", you are just going towards the right.
Pellissippie (2020-01-13 22:43:28+00:00): If this kind of modeling is not practiced in Kazakhstan, can you please add it to the WikiProject page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Kazakhstan. That way other mappers will know not do do that. 

Also in the future if you have feedback, feel free to message Andrew, our community lead: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/andrewwiseman
chnav (2020-01-14 05:38:30+00:00): Him thanks for response and explanations.  

Different companies use different approach for the mapping and have own guides, not always compatible to OSM rules. We do not map for specific navigators nor renderer nor validators. The main rule for roads mapping is "one physical carriageway = one highway in OSM". There are exclusions for 3+ lanes with complicated turn restrictions but not in above case. I am sure navigation software developers can adjust the software for specific cases instead of changing database.  

I see the MapBox (US company) uses own guide based on US-talks group. Then probably it should be applied to US only 'cause the rest of world was not part of that discussion and it is not voted in OSM nor hard written in Wiki.  

Thanks and happy mapping
chnav (2020-01-14 05:39:58+00:00): ... excuse for my typos...
chnav (2020-01-13 15:26:21+00:00): Fully reverted. 
Mass edits using wrong mapping practice. These are T-junctions, not Y- or V-junctions.
Pellissippie (2020-01-13 22:53:42+00:00): I responded here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78033345
user_6110846 (2019-12-06 08:17:32+00:00): Комментарий 

revert уничтожения данных картографом KKS
Dimacn (2019-12-06 11:17:48+00:00): Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM: 1. Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park Пожалуйста удалите ваш парк. 2. Не надо давать названия жилым домам в теге name, номер дома ставится только в addr:housenumber
gendy54 (2019-12-07 20:33:25+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai fait qlq modifs sur la boulangerie.
Si vous connaissez le nom, rajoutez le https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses..

Sinon pas d'infos subjectives et/ou personnelles dans OSM
gendy54 (2019-12-07 20:25:09+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai fait quelques modifications que je vous laisse découvrir.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78036118
gendy54 (2019-12-07 20:13:47+00:00): Merci pour les infos.
En revanche, OSM ne doit pas contenir que des infos objectives et non subjectives et /ou personnelles. J'ai donc supprimé les commentaires sur la qualité du commerce
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78036645
yxoc (2020-01-05 17:48:35+00:00): Bonsoir, merci de ne pas metre des crossings au croissement enttre une voie d'acces et le bord du trottoir. Ce n'est pas le sens de crossing.
abakus_uploader (2019-12-06 23:31:19+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
PT-53 (2019-12-14 07:17:37+00:00): Hallo kartler175,
in kepp right werden hier
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=47.58049&lon=9.83467&zoom=18&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C20
mehrere übereinander liegende Knoten angezeigt.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Slowboydickie (2019-12-06 09:15:08+00:00): Thanks for the comments.  The routing software is Komoot.  Komoot will not accept routes in a southerly direction on that footpath.  Inspection of OSM showed an arrow on the footpath in a northerly direction.
rskedgell (2019-12-06 09:41:43+00:00): I've had a little play with Komoot and I *think* it may be taking the scenic route because of the access=private tag on Yew Tree Road. I've added a note ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2017947 ). If it hasn't been resolved by the next time I do Mole Valley parkrun, I'll take a look and hopefully upload some imagery to Mapillary.
Slowboydickie (2019-12-06 09:51:22+00:00): I will be going for a run today so I can take some photos.  What in particular would you like?
rskedgell (2019-12-06 11:43:31+00:00): That's great, thanks!

If there's any public footpath signage on Yew Tree Road, particularly at its junction with Ashcombe Road, then foot=designated could probably be added to that section.

If you're local and there isn't any signage, but it is the route walkers "always" use from Dorking West to Denbies, then perhaps just add foot=permissive?

If you could take pics with the Mapillary app (see https://www.mapillary.com/ ), that would make them easily available to other mappers.
gendy54 (2019-12-07 20:09:36+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour cette information de qualité.
En revanche, le tag opening_hours n'accepte qu'une syntaxe particulière pour être exploitée par les différents outils. Il aurait fallu soit écrire les horaires dans cette syntaxe, soit mettre le texte en description.
J'en ai donc profité pour faire quelques modifs et améliorations
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78037233