piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
SHARCRASH (2022-09-16 15:32:59+00:00): positions enhanced (JOSM deleted my preferences, past comments no more suggested)
tux67 (2022-09-17 05:37:21+00:00): Hi, kannst du das bitte wieder rückgängig machen. Das vehicle= no war Absicht. Auf den mapillary Bildern siehst du das entsprechende Schild. Und wir mappen den vor Ort Zustand. Wenn da jemand reinfährt tut er das gegen die Verkehrsregeln.
Gruß
Tux67
highflyer74 (2022-09-16 17:19:43+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please note that you are editing a worldwide geographic database. Please do not add random objects all over the place (pharmacies and bus stops in the ocean and in the middle of nature).

Thank you!
highflyer74 (2022-09-16 17:20:23+00:00): Info: CS fully reverted.
highflyer74 (2022-09-16 17:19:33+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please note that you are editing a worldwide geographic database. Please do not add random objects all over the place (pharmacies and bus stops in the ocean and in the middle of nature).

Thank you!
highflyer74 (2022-09-16 17:20:28+00:00): Info: CS fully reverted.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-20 20:21:15+00:00): parcialmente revertido
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-20 22:36:24+00:00): porque excluiu esta via? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420885362
AWaltrick (2022-09-20 23:25:49+00:00): boa noite Eric,
via foi excluída por que não existe mais condições de acesso para veículos . Podemos transformar uma via de trilha de caminhada se vc quiser deixar o acesso mapeado.
Eu trabalho na operações do sistema elétrico da região leste do RS, por esse motivo conhecemos a região e transitamos no local.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-20 23:31:34+00:00): Você deveria ter feito isso então, e não excluído.
AWaltrick (2022-09-20 23:43:32+00:00): OK, vou refazer a via.
Abraços.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-20 23:58:41+00:00): Não precisa refazer, só colocar outro tipo. Tracei com base em trilhas GPS do strava.
eggie (2022-09-16 17:40:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Wanneer dit een fietspad is oke, maar als dit niet het geval is dan is het taggen voor de router en dat is niet de bedoeling. Wat is de werkelijke status van de weg? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-16 17:54:48+00:00): Je fietspad heb ik weer aangepast naar residential. Er staan paaltjes. 
Een uitneembare. Het zou dus niet moeten navigeren voor motorvoertuigen.
Ik heb moped mofa = yes toegevoegd.
De voorgaande mapper had het afgesloten door vehicle=no te taggen op het paaltje. Dat is ook onjuist.
Welke navigatie gaat hier de fout in.
Het routeerde zelfs niet voor fietsers hier... alleen voor motorfietsen?



MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-16 18:15:38+00:00): Zie routering  https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=52.05354%2C5.23302%3B52.05267%2C5.23384#map=18/52.05265/5.23255
IvoKH (2022-09-16 18:16:52+00:00): Sorry voor de onduidelijkheid in mijn bericht. De navigatie die de mist in gaat gebruikt waarschijnlijk geen OSM. Maar dat was de aanleiding voor mij om hier naar te kijken (zowel op OSM als op Google).
De Cornelis van Sandelaan loop hier nog een kort stukje door om toegang te geven tot een parkeerplaats. Vervolgens versmalt de weg door een stuk gras met twee bomen. Een auto past hier nog wel door.
Dan staan er aan de Vuurdoornerf/Johan uten Boomgaarterf kant inderdaad paaltjes waarvan er één uitneembaar is. Aan de Cornelis van Sandelaan kant staat een doodlopende weg bord. Het wordt niet als fietspad aangeduid maar dat is in mijn ogen wel het doel van deze doorgang.
Misschien heb je wat aan deze informatie. Ik hoor het wel als ik nog wat zou kunnen aanpassen.

MVG,
Ivo
eggie (2022-09-16 18:36:20+00:00): Hoi.. 
Kritisch kijken is uiteraard prima. 
Het blijft soms 'grijs' wat iets is.  We proberen wel zoveel mogelijk volgens de bebording te taggen. Zo'n weg kan belangrijk zijn voor hulpdiensten. Bv de brandweer. Die heeft een sleutel van zo'n paaltje.
Het routeert niet voor auto's hier.. Nu nog steeds niet, maar wel weer voor tweewielers.
Wanneer het echt smal is en er geen bord staat en ook niet geschikt is voor voertuigen met 4 wielen dan taggen we highway=path.
Staat er een G7 bord dan footwat.. Staat er een G11, 13, 12a bord dan pas fietspad.
Dit is volgens mij nog steeds een residential. Niet bedoeld voor auto's, maar wel de mogelijkheid voor hulpdiensten.
Die routeren tegenwoordig mbv OSM. Bv IJssellland, 
https://www.vrijsselland.nl/liveop-x/



Verder in uitzonderingsgevallen doen we aan Ducktagging. Het kwaakt als een eend dus is het een eend, maar dat is hier niet aan de orde. 


Veel plezier met mappen,
eggie
(validator)
opendcc (2022-09-16 16:41:54+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Ein kleine Anmerkung zum edit: der Name ist wirklich nur der Eigenname. Dass es ein Picknicktisch ist, das ergibt sich aus den tags.

Servus
NightH (2022-09-29 07:40:27+00:00): Szia!

Az Akácfa utca miért lett highway=secondary? A KIRA adatbázisában nem szerepel számozott útként.
yasslay (2022-09-17 21:13:59+00:00): Hello!

I am very sorry but I appear to have mistakenly removed the path and changed the country park to brownfield land. I assumed this because it seemed like the country park was inaccessible due to the construction works in Faversham Lakes. Can you confirm if this is the case?

Kind regards,
yasslay
yasslay (2022-09-17 21:15:34+00:00): I'll reinstate the park and I am very sorry for the changes I made. I'll try and identify other country paths as well.
yasslay (2022-09-17 21:27:15+00:00): Hello!

I apologise for the panic, however I have reinstated the park and footpath, and have also extended and added some other ways which I believe are footpaths as well in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126313319). I will continue to identify more paths.

Kind regards,
yasslay
Faversham99 (2022-09-18 11:56:46+00:00): Hi - no problem! Difficult when the sat imagery is so old. The country park is accessible now, but the reinstated footpaths are incorrect - I will be doing a GPS Trace shortly though to correct. Cheers!
Faversham99 (2022-09-18 12:42:12+00:00): Just to let you know I have completed the GPS Trace and added in the footpaths. Thanks
Frans S (2022-09-19 07:39:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested.
In general, your mappings are accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Nodes of buildings connected to other buildings or roads.
A building can be mapped with 4 nodes (rectangular) or 6 (with extension) Because of the angle at which the image is taken, it appears that there is a corner in the middle. Just map them as rectangular.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126271145
Frans S (2022-09-19 07:39:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested.
In general, your mappings are accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Nodes of buildings connected to other buildings or roads.
A building can be mapped with 4 nodes (rectangular) or 6 (with extension) Because of the angle at which the image is taken, it appears that there is a corner in the middle. Just map them as rectangular.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126271145
Vonter (2022-11-27 12:40:30+00:00): Hello. I noticed that you have mapped an under construction natural gas pipeline in this changeset. Was this an approximate trace done manually or is there a source available which you could use as reference? I'm interested in mapping similar natural gas pipelines in other parts of India, so any pointers would be helpful to get data for the rest of the country. Thanks!
Ti_Ru (2022-12-06 11:35:18+00:00): Hi. It was a trace done over dig marks in satellite imagery and had used a few news articles for determining the purpose of the pipelines. Thanks.
SzymonH (2022-09-17 15:27:29+00:00): Znaki określają zakaz wjazdu dla pojazdów z wyłączeniem autobusów. Nie można tagować pod routing czy inne zewnętrzne aplikacje.
NieWnen (2022-09-17 17:30:25+00:00): Zmieniłem access na: access=no + psv=designated – co oznacza dostęp tylko i wyłącznie dla transportu publicznego. 

Możesz napisać coś więcej o tych "programach"?
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
SomeoneElse (2022-09-16 17:22:45+00:00): Thanks!
highflyer74 (2022-09-16 17:23:46+00:00): Welcome ;-)
mcliquid (2022-09-16 17:16:00+00:00): Sorry for the big bbox, forgot the change in Cuxhaven...
stevea (2022-09-19 02:37:47+00:00): It's true that these are not admin_level=5, as they are a "special district" (as that has come to be known in these 50 united states).  They are a boundary, but they are not administrative.
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
impiaaa (2022-09-17 18:54:47+00:00): Thanks for adding a changeset description. However I still don't think "place=*" is an appropriate tag for these features. The tag is reserved for human settlements, like towns and cities; as well as large geographic features, like islands. In the context of settlements, the tag is meant to be used on a point, as a label, rather than a boundary. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place . I'd encourage you to reach out to one of the many OSM communities—mailing list, wiki, forum, IRC, Slack, Discord…—to get an agreement on how to tag these. Here's a full list: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels
stevea (2022-09-18 05:37:19+00:00): These are essentially "wrong" in OSM:  there is no such thing as "place=district" and these are "fire districts," which we (the entire project, not simply "here in California") do not map.
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mcliquid (2022-09-16 18:53:27+00:00): Statt ein noexit, verwende doch lieber ein building=entrance
Siehe für die genaue Verwendung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dentrance
twalter (2022-09-16 20:08:27+00:00): Danke vielmals für die Anregung. 
Wenn ich genau weiss, wo der Eingang liegt, verwende ich auch schon entrance=yes oder = garage. 
Ohne dass man vor bei geht, ist dies meistens nicht möglich.
Viele Grüsse
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
gscholz (2022-09-17 05:48:29+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85,
your recent edit tend to add errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.53819&lat=-26.17424&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this ans may be think about how to avoid these?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-09-19 05:05:25+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-09-17 05:48:25+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85,
your recent edit tend to add errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-58.53819&lat=-26.17424&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this ans may be think about how to avoid these?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-09-19 05:04:22+00:00): Hi martin_ferrari85, 
these errors still exists, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-22 09:59:54+00:00): Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 11 è sbagliato. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 11:48:19+00:00): grazie, corretto. Questo purtroppo era già sfuggito da 3 anni agli occhi dei mappatori, ottimo che abbiamo risolto con il tuo aiuto.
gscholz (2022-09-19 06:46:22+00:00): Hi zlyntud,
thsi changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding wrongly assigned relation rules:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=112.07166&lat=-6.89754&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126273872

May be you like to educate yourself about how to properly edit multipolygon relations:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-10-16 06:01:07+00:00): Hi zlyntud, 
this errors still exists, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-16 18:10:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126274063
JuaFritz (2022-12-11 18:03:30+00:00): Hi, this is not a cycleway. Plus there are clear road signs that forbid bicycle usage in the biotope.
EdoBoo (2022-09-17 16:09:02+00:00): Che bella notizia!
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
PT-53 (2022-12-09 07:44:10+00:00): Hallo WiederMalVerlaufen,
diese von Dir eingezeichnete Kinie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095222779/history
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Grüße
PT-53 (2023-01-04 08:54:07+00:00): Hallo WiederMalVerlaufen, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße
und noch ein
Gutes Neues Jahr

PS:
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2023-01-29 08:18:38+00:00): Hallo WiederMalVerlaufen,
diese von Dir eingezeichnete Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095222779/history
hat leider immer noch keine Merkmale.
Bitte schaue Dir das doch nochmal an.
Grüße
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
canfe (2022-09-21 10:25:27+00:00): Sabbe meglio non taggare gli edifici con tag inerenti ai negozi. Estraili su di un nodo a parte, così c'è l'icona e se il negozio si sposta, basta spostare il nodo. L'edifici, ben difficilmente, si sposta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126274665
RinBalzo (2022-09-23 18:19:42+00:00): Va bene, ho corretto. Grazie del consiglio.
P.S.: Spero che taggare il caseificio con shop=cheese sia corretto.
canfe (2022-09-24 05:33:19+00:00): Direi che hai fatto un ottimo lavoro.
Se vuoi puoi aggiungere fax, email, sito web (che non è pagina web guarda la diffeernza) se il posteggio è gratis, il fondo stradale, se ci sono bagni e se per handycap....
Ma se usi per la prima volta un tag, leggi prima la wiki. Se poi hai dubbi chiedi pure.
RinBalzo (2022-09-28 20:28:05+00:00): Va bene, grazie mille.
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
DD1GJ (2022-09-18 18:02:35+00:00): Hello Milancer,

emergency=access_point is only a proposal that has never been finally voted on. Due to its great importance for the rescue system, tagging should therefore not be changed without cross-national consensus. I have therefore restored the original status of the points in Germany.

Many greetings, Joachim
Milancer (2022-09-19 10:51:08+00:00): Hi, you are right. The entire changeset has been reverted.

Milan
eggie (2022-09-16 18:49:14+00:00): Hi. I merged your info with the present addressnode. 
Greetz,
eggie
_Mathieu_ (2023-01-02 12:03:06+00:00): Bonjour,

cycleway:left=separate indique qu'une voie cyclable devrait être tracée séparément à gauche de la voie, or je n'en vois aucune.

S'il s'agit d'une simple bande cyclable, le bon tag est soit cycleway:left=opposite_lane, soit cycleway:left=lane + cycleway:left:lane:oneway=-1

S'il n'y a pas de marquage d'une bande cyclable, alors c'est un simple cycleway:left=opposite

Merci !

Mathieu
Coooly (2023-01-02 13:35:37+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu, 
merci de la remarque j'avais oublié d'ajouter la chicane et la piste séparée qui continue tout droit. 
Est-ce que tu pourrais me dire si c'est mieux maintenant ?
Merci !
Fabio
_Mathieu_ (2023-01-02 13:46:48+00:00): Bonjour Fabio,

Merci pour le commentaire rapide !
C'est presque bon : sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095225471 puisqu'une piste cyclable a été tracée séparément à gauche, il faut supprimer le cycleway:left:oneway=-1 et le oneway:bicycle=no

Merci pour les modifs, et bonne continuation !

Mathieu
Coooly (2023-01-02 13:55:50+00:00): Merci, j'ai supprimé les deux attributs.
SekeRob (2022-09-16 19:05:04+00:00): Hi,

momentarily 2 gaps in your route, north and south of Corropoli.

momentaneamente 2 stacchi nel tuo percorso, nord e sud di Corropoli.

Ciao
_PhilB_ (2022-09-16 19:13:22+00:00): Yeah, I had just realised, thanks
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2024-11-13 05:34:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
aTarom (2022-09-17 06:11:41+00:00): Please look at this very long "wwwww...." key

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5906859/history

version 72
Bicycle Tourer (2022-09-17 08:17:13+00:00): Many thanks for catching this, it's fixed.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-19 15:50:10+00:00): Ciao. Mi piacerebbe capire perché stai cancellando i passaggi a livello, che esistono ancora tutti. Tra l'altro, su una linea che giusto ieri ha visto il passaggio di un treno turistico a vapore e che sarà riattivata l'anno prossimo. Ciao, Andrea
Kovoschiz (2022-09-17 07:07:43+00:00): Please be careful. You have removed the number of towers. Turning stations are not passenger "station"s, and you have created duplicates for them.
Kovoschiz (2022-09-17 07:31:11+00:00): 2. The towers are clearly on the west side though?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Hufkratzer (2022-09-16 20:33:39+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889162588 looks like a riding arena (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena) in the aerial view, but you have tagged it with leisure=horse_riding, which is for complete riding centres (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding).
JuliusOne (2022-09-16 21:40:23+00:00): Hi, good catch!  I did not modify the tags however, a previous mapper added the horse_riding tag.  I just disconnected some nodes of the way from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561528789 to avoid the landuse=residential to cross buildings.

The wiki is quite clear on the subject and from aerial images, it looks like a leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian.  I updated the tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126279263
Hufkratzer (2022-09-17 09:15:12+00:00): Yes, it was not your fault. Sorry and thanks for correcting.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
surveyor54 (2022-09-17 08:43:56+00:00): Hi,
für die Postfiliale  im Nahkauf existierte bereits ein Eintrag nach dem neuen Schema.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7395708396

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office

Gruß
surveyor54
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.