piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Airlobster (2016-08-20 19:57:54+00:00): The area is already tagged with "landuse=reservoir". I added "intermittent=yes".

I'm not 100% sure, but when googling some pictures it looks more like a waterhole that is called a "dam" because it looks like a small dam.
mavl (2019-05-13 17:12:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:12:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:12:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:12:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:12:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
Alecs01 (2016-08-17 08:26:14+00:00): Hi and welcome, what did you mapped here? It'a hotel maybe?
jc86035 (2019-02-05 05:22:16+00:00): I've deleted the relation per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Infobox_mapframe#Parameter_disabling_the_display_of_OSM_relation_borders?
edgrmdna (2016-08-17 19:30:59+00:00): PLEASE be more careful with your edits. Here you added a building that overlays two others that were previously created.  The building you added is not at all representative of real-life features, is topologically incorrect, and can weaken data integrity for those that may need data from this area. 

Some of your other building additions were also irregularly shaped.  Hit Q to orthogonalize them if you're using JOSM.
Good luck!
oini (2016-08-31 10:52:19+00:00): Hey Joanna,
I've reverted your changeset as it contained untagged ways. Please check http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways to know more about the mapping conventions on OSM. Let me know if you have further queries.
Cheers,
Oindrila
serock (2016-08-22 18:01:00+00:00): Favor de sacar la categoría de los POI, gracias, Saludos.
user_5359 (2016-08-17 04:28:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information (like HOME) from residential or owner to a residential building!
trigpoint (2016-08-17 16:31:31+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for you addition but what is here now? Looking at bing imagery I am guessing it should probably be tagged as leisure=park.
Cheers Phil
Johnny Mapperseed (2017-02-01 18:56:42+00:00): Why mark trees in the middle of a forest? You aren't wrong that there is a tree though. Philosophical OSM?
bazbazbaz (2017-02-01 23:42:42+00:00): they are really good trees
oini (2016-08-31 10:52:06+00:00): Hey Gerardo,
I've reverted your changeset as it contained untagged ways. Please check http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways to know more about the mapping conventions on OSM. Let me know if you have further queries.
Cheers,
Oindrila
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44650611 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
manoharuss (2016-08-17 06:32:27+00:00): Hi VictorIE,

Your contributions to OpenStreetMap are greatly appreciated. I looked through this changeset along with your other  changesets 41465760, 41488327, 41488458 to understand what happened here. The wiki for tagging power stations is here(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dstation). The correct way is to tag an individual power unit as a substation as mentioned in the wiki. You have given names to the polygons stating "Diagnostic remove if present after DATE". This may be useful and might make sense to you, but this is a public map database people use on daily basis. Please feel free to comment here. Please fix this or I would have to revert your changes.

Best,
Manohar
VictorIE (2016-08-17 08:03:32+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for the unorthodox method. I've been removing deprecated tags and names. For example:

http://stat.latlon.org/ie/latest/tags-o.html lists operator=ESB (154), operator=ESB Generation and Wholesale Markets (21), operator=ESB Networks (394), operator=ESB Telecoms (3), operator=ESB ecars (1), operator=Ecar (26) - each part of the same statutory company group (ESB) that runs most of the electricity system, but each with a different legal function. Part of its function (high voltage transmission system) has been moved to a different company EirGrid, which is again listed as EirGRid (1), EirGrid (1685) and Eirgrid (50). Additionally, Northern Ireland Electricity has been split into NIE Networks (a subsidiary of ESB) and Power NI, so I am also changing those names. :)

Similarly, station (40), sub_station (90), substation (464) are the same thing, but are sometimes confused with transformer (575) - often because the ESB uses confusing names for its sites. 

I have corrected many of these entries using http://taginfo.openstreetmap.ie/tags/power=sub_station and http://stat.latlon.org/ However, the former only maps tags when there are at least 50 of them (counted the **previous** time they are mapped), while the latter only gives hyperlinks for nodes / ways when there are less than 20. The number of power=sub_station has dropped from 90 on 5 August 2016 to 16 today, as I have changed them to power=substation. On the next update of http://stat.latlon.org/ I can remove the last 16.

The problem arises when there are between 21 and 50 items using a particular tag. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.ie/ stops mapping them, but http://stat.latlon.org/ doesn't list them all. I've added the diagnostics so that http://taginfo.openstreetmap.ie/ will still map them.

Similarly, I've changed about 4,000 entries for track* to passenger_lines=* When http://stat.latlon.org/ updates, I will be able to change the last 11 entries (some may be zero length ways and difficult to find on ID).

I removed one diagnostic yesterday and one today.

Currently:

operator=Eirgrid has 91 entries (50 diagnostic) - I will remove this today.

operator=ESB has 102 entries (60 diagnostic) - I will remove this as soon as possible. Probably tomorrow.

operator=NIE has 101 entries (65 diagnostic) - I will remove this as soon as possible. Probably in the next few days

Colm
VictorIE (2016-08-17 08:27:05+00:00): http://stat.latlon.org/ has updated. I'll get to work. :)
VictorIE (2016-08-18 13:33:15+00:00):  I'm working on the last set and it should be gone today
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44650611 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
user_5359 (2016-08-17 04:25:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of your node. I can’t find the street of the address nearby.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44650611 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44650611 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44650611 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
mapper999 (2016-10-02 22:29:17+00:00): Is Tigard Taphouse the name of the building or the name of the proposed bar? If it is the name of the bar, I'd suggest moving it to proposed:name. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354091499)
cowdog (2016-10-03 20:56:17+00:00): That's actually what I meant to do. Thanks for the catch. Its been fixed now.
Maanya (2016-08-17 07:14:08+00:00): Hey Rudyak,
Your efforts in adding data into OSM is deeply appreciated. However, could you please let us know why the stream in this area was deleted. It would be great if you could check the history as well for information on source based on which it was added previously.
Thank you very much.
Rudyak (2016-08-17 13:03:29+00:00): Hi, I live in this area and I know these mountains very well: there aren't creeks or water in those little valleys and canals.
Bye
felipeeugenio (2021-12-02 20:12:51+00:00): Esto no es para agregar datos personales
Fauzan IRM-ED (2023-03-21 09:19:14+00:00): Hi, tyree
Thank you for your mapping contribution.
While doing validation about Multipolygon relation, I found that some natural=woods area (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/6497917) and (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/6497851) added into relation type:multipolygon by you.
As far as I know, relation multi polygon must consist of more than 1 area (polygon) to explain the attachment of 1 object to another object. So IMO, if just only one object and one role no need to put relation. Do you mind if I fix this with delete the relation?
Due to my lack of local knowledge on this area, why landuse in this area mapped in a square shape? This is something I'm not familiar with
Feel free to provide any suggestions, it will be really appreciated :)
Thank You, and Happy Mapping!
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-16 02:00:13+00:00): Hi Tom Layo. Your edit looks awesome, but I improve geometry water body (id 437527515) due crossing with highway. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/142919907). Thank you.
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:51:00+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Maanya (2016-08-17 06:28:36+00:00): Hey Carlos1961,
Your efforts in adding data to OSM is deeply appreciated. However, it would be great if you could let us know why was a road tagged as 'residential' deleted from this locality. 
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Maanya.
pacho1961 (2016-08-17 14:25:05+00:00): Hello,
When checking the areas highlighted as residential, I note that very large areas, but there are areas that are many brands and result in areas that also have shops, they are not exclusively residential
pacho1961 (2016-08-17 14:26:06+00:00): however check this area again as residential greetings
pacho1961 (2016-08-17 14:27:57+00:00): any other situations please write me, I'm trying to improve the area where I live, and I paecen a great job for maps
Vinber-Pro (2024-02-08 17:16:54+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai l'impression que l'on peut supprimer étant donné que ceci existe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3203751#map=8/-22.109/46.785

Avis ?

à plus
rashaurl (2016-08-17 08:33:54+00:00): зачем переименовали улицу неправильно?
rashaurl (2016-08-17 08:34:19+00:00): согласен что улица двухсторонняя
rashaurl (2016-08-17 08:54:13+00:00): извиняюсь, улица была до вас переименована
user_5359 (2016-08-17 17:15:19+00:00): Welcome to oSM! Please notice: ou are not a church! Please move your buisness to the right building.
poornibadrinath (2016-08-17 06:17:05+00:00): Hi Ray Calladine,
 I came across your edits and noticed you have tagged an office or business space as tourism=attraction. This tag is for places which has tourism value or places which a lot of people visit and this tag is not meant for offices. Can you please explain whether you tagged it this way because the office deals with tourism? Can you please change the tag to the appropriate one for a business?
Best,
Poornima Badrinath
BCNorwich (2016-08-17 07:52:07+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have reversed the name change on the bus stop because that name is given by the bus company it is not the actual pub name. Bus company name is "The Gate, adj" meaning that the stop is adjacent to a local feature and not the feature itself.
I have also adjusted the guest house tagging to better suit OSM practices and added the website. Regards.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-22 08:03:48+00:00): sorry to bother you about an ancient edit...

But can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4489302 if you remember this area by any chance?
gzin (2024-10-22 18:45:33+00:00): Yes I think so. It is 6 years ago that I've been there but I think there was a waterfall and a spring very close to each other. The water from the spring came into the stream.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:32:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
apm-wa (2017-02-15 17:38:19+00:00): Это не больница, это лечебный источник, я поэтому переклассифицировал как источник.
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:51:28+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
az09 (2016-11-04 07:20:39+00:00): Вы доктор? Когда можно на приём подойти? =)
j-wills (2016-11-12 20:27:14+00:00): Круто! Теперь мы все знаем, где вы живете! ;)
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:51:53+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Luzandro (2019-09-13 16:11:53+00:00): Hallo Schermy,

du hast hier bei diesem Fußweg bicycle=yes entfernt, was etwas eigenartig aussieht, nachdem dort 3 große Radrouten darüber führen sollen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126102606
Schermy (2019-09-19 07:12:05+00:00): Hallo,

die Relationen der Radrouten verlaufen hier falsch. Der Weg ist ein reiner Fußweg und ist auch mit einer Tafel so gekennzeichnet. Die Radrouten verlaufen in diesem Berich direkt über den Franz-Hinterholzer-Kai und gehen dann in den Treppelweg über. Ich werden die Relationen berichtigen. BG
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:31:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-05-13 17:12:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:31:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
TheSwavu (2016-08-18 03:10:29+00:00): Less wonky street, more whole area being redeveloped.
Schermy (2016-09-07 13:09:29+00:00): Das ist kein doppelter Punkt, das ist ein Wegweiser und nicht der Gipfel. Der Wegweiser steht genau dort! Ich werden diesen Änderungssatz reverten!
Patxirrindulari (2016-10-13 12:14:30+00:00): Der name vom Wegweiser hat mich verwirrt weil auch Hochglocker genant wurde.
Schermy (2016-09-07 12:59:48+00:00): Hallo, warum hast du den Wegweiser verschoben? Der steht doch direkt neben der Straße und nicht bei der Kapelle?
Patxirrindulari (2016-10-13 12:12:34+00:00): Hallo,
ich wurde sagen, dass es war ein Fehler.
Ich wollte is in der Weg verschobe und nicht als ein extra Punkt lassen. Ich finde es sauberer.
mueschel (2016-08-19 09:19:45+00:00): Hi,
could you have a look on this way? 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38181947
u = 1 is a strange tag.
Cheers, Jan
gspinoza (2016-08-19 09:23:37+00:00): It was obviously a typo, it was supposed to be layer =1 

fixed.
maraf24 (2016-08-20 19:06:42+00:00): Wycofałem tę zmianę.
Proszę unikać edytowania węzłów miejscowości.
Diomas (2016-08-18 20:25:32+00:00): Зачем почтовые отделения обозначать почтовыми ящиками?
Pavel47 (2016-08-19 05:53:48+00:00): Это разные объекты, и они имеют разный набор тегов, хотя часто и расположены рядом. Если теги почты приписаны ящику, то это, действительно, ошибка. Вы точно ко мне?
Diomas (2016-08-22 07:23:17+00:00): я не против того, что вы добавили post_box'ы (это действительно дополнительные объекты), но зачем удалили post_office? Хотите сказать, там больше нет 195030 почтового отделения?
Diomas (2016-08-22 07:25:23+00:00): и отдел доставки тоже странно обозначен: post_office=delivery (уточняющий тег) без тега amenity=post_office.
Pavel47 (2016-08-22 07:34:41+00:00): Почему ж нет? Если внимательно посмотрите, то я просто заменил точку полигоном. А отдел доставки - это часть почтового отделения, дублировать amenity=post_office там не нужно.
Diomas (2016-08-22 07:38:51+00:00): Точно, на вее тег, прошу прощения за беспокойство
mueschel (2016-08-18 08:46:34+00:00): Could you please explain these edits? What is the source of data, what does the tag "bot=yes" mean? Please note that automatic edits are strongly discouraged and at least need a proper description and contact in the user details.
Jan
SearchAroundBot (2016-08-18 09:11:25+00:00): Hi Jan, 

This edit was done by a user via a Telegram bot (SearchAroundBot) which enables people to insert new locations such as amenity=drinking_water and amenity=toilets in OSM.

About bot=yes, please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

The bot has been recently created and can certainly be improved. Please let me know which additional information i should provide when inserting a new node.

Thanks,
Federico
mueschel (2016-08-18 09:48:36+00:00): The wiki page does not mention the tag. But I gives general advice for such bots, like "Your documentation should state:
Who is making the change (real name and how to contact, ideally e-mail address). Approved Bots should have a wiki page that with the name of your bot as the title. They should also have a user account of the same name with clear links between the user account and the wiki page."
I noted that the changeset comments are mostly unrelated to the change actually done.
SearchAroundBot (2016-08-18 12:08:48+00:00): Hi,

bot=yes is mentioned in that page under section "Execute with caution" in the 6th bullet point.

In my understanding the wiki page for bots is necessary if the bot is fully automated. I nevertheless just create a wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SearchAroundBot) and added it to the list of other (fully automated) bots (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bot). 
This information is now inserted in the note tag of the nodes created by the bot and in the changeset comment together with my email address (kercos@gmail.com).

Please let me know if there is any additional information i should provide.

Best,
Federico
mueschel (2016-08-18 12:16:37+00:00): It says bot=yes is a "tag to the changeset", not to the objects you add. The information you have in the note should be in the changeset comment, not on the nodes itself.
SearchAroundBot (2016-08-18 12:43:31+00:00): You are right! I've moved the bot tag to the changeset and added comments in changeset as well. Thanks!
BCNorwich (2016-08-18 06:14:10+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've looked at your first mapping and would like to make a few comments. 
You added (inadvertently?) two nodes without description tags (4353676095 and 4353676094), these should be appropriately tagged or if unintentional should be removed.
You added (inadvertently?) ways 437557067 and 437557068  which have no tags and should either be tagged or removed as appropriate.
You added a closed linear way "Norwich International Airport (437557069)" as the airport boundary. The airport boundary is already mapped and fully described in the "Multipolygon Relation: Norwich International Airport (535525)". Therefore, as the new way/outline is a duplication of the data and the boundary, it can be removed. Any adjustments or amendments of data, plus any changes in the boundary outline should be made on the multipolygon.
This is a link to the multipolygon :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/535525
Sorry to find problems with your first additions to OSM.  If I or the OSM community be of any help please just ask. Regards.
BCNorwich (2016-09-06 05:56:21+00:00): No response from mapper Jorik Michiels so two untagged nodes and two untagged ways are now removed. The duplicated airport boundary was deleted by 4b696d a few days ago. The above issue is now resolved.