piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2018-10-03 09:20:06+00:00): Hi,

the OpenStreetMap community expects you to maintain a wiki page about your team in a fashion similar to Mentz or Mapbox if your team is larger than two or three people. To allow the community to find all accounts related to your organisation easily. That page should be linked from the profile pages of all team members.

That wiki page does not exist yet and I would like to ask you to add this page before you upload any other edits.

Best regards

Michael
gseethar (2018-10-03 11:17:03+00:00): Hi Michael,

Thanks for the update. We are working on our WIKI page as per your suggestion. We will keep you posted with the same at the earliest. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Ganesh
gseethar (2018-10-29 12:18:25+00:00): Hi Michael,

We have uploaded our OSM WIKI page - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_Logistics
We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Ganesh
eggie (2018-08-02 13:30:14+00:00): Leisure park is een functie en geen landuse. Zo'n Leisure park leg je los over een echt park heen en geeft het ook een naam. Plak geen vlakken aan huizen. Graag reactie. (parkedits liggen onder een vergrootglas bij OSM)
Streammz (2018-08-02 13:39:35+00:00): Het park had inderdaad een grass landmark moeten zijn nu je het zo zegt.

> Plak geen vlakken aan huizen.
Houdt dit in dat enkel de nodes niet connected mogen zijn? of dat het elkaar echt niet mag aanraken
eggie (2018-08-02 13:48:01+00:00): Nou officieeel mogen ze elkaar niet raken, want dan gaat de validator van editor JOSM zeuren. ik negeer dat nu in dit geval. Ik heb gewoon wat losgemaakt, maar de node liggen natuurlijk nog op elkaar. geen probleem.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:49:34+00:00): Wanneer je echt serieus wilt gaan mappen schakel dan over op JOSM.
Vrijwel alle mappers van het forum gebruiken die editor.
Je hebt dan een "validator" die waarschuwt bij een verkeerde upload. 
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
maraf24 (2018-08-08 17:09:18+00:00): Co to za przybytek? Dla dzieci? Ma stronę www?
Hjart (2018-08-02 10:49:03+00:00): Sådan en har vel normalt ikke egen adresse?
Ann Seemann (2018-08-02 10:54:23+00:00): Systemet bad om en adresse og så skrev jeg det på.. Er det et ptoblem eller er adressen forkert?
Hilsen Ann
Hjart (2018-08-02 11:12:40+00:00): "Systemet bad om en adresse"? Jeg ville nok vurdere om ikke det der system er helt korrekt i sådan en situation. Desuden var der jo i forvejen angivet en basket kurv/bane på stedet.
Ann Seemann (2018-08-02 11:29:07+00:00): Hej igen,
Du har ret i, at det ikke skal stå 2 gange, men jeg trode at det var min kommentar, der havde bevirket at det stod 2 gange, fordi, der stod ikke noget før. Dette var mit første forsøg med systemet og altså ikke så velkykket, men jeg prøver at blive bedre og skal nok prøve at fjerne den ene af teksterne.
atcomapper (2018-08-02 15:40:31+00:00): Hej Ann

Alle de felter, der kommer frem ude i venstre side når du redigerer kortet, er IKKE obligatoriske. Det er altså kun forslag til, hvilke information der kan være tilknyttet et objekt. Du kan derfor sagtens lade nogle af felterne stå tomme. Du kan desuden også selv tilføje andre felter, ved at trykke på den grå knap med et + (plus) nederst i venstre side.
Ann Seemann (2018-08-02 16:35:13+00:00): Tusind tak for hjælpen, jeg skal nok prøve at lære det. Hilsen Ann
Alexander-II (2018-08-30 19:25:34+00:00): Duplicated name:en in parentheses in name.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61292981
imagico (2018-08-07 08:18:02+00:00): Thanks.  That's a very good deed.
mapwitch (2018-08-07 09:03:10+00:00): :-D
BladeTC (2018-08-07 16:08:18+00:00): Why? I had a lot of work cleaning up the mess around the Amazon's River, unified all the relations, so now you split it all again?
imagico (2018-08-07 16:38:35+00:00): Riverbank polygons should always be split into relatively small, easy to handle parts.  Large riverbank polygons are difficult to edit and to properly verify for validity for the mapper and more difficult to handle for the data user, they break much more frequently than small polygons and with much more severe consequences.
smaprs (2018-08-07 17:08:50+00:00): It's said: if it's not wrong, don't fix it. Was it wrong?  
Also, I suppose it should've been discussed, as usual in OSM, at local, brazilian, community, before undoing Blade's huge work, since he has shown us his results and found no opposition. Right?
imagico (2018-08-07 17:24:27+00:00): No one has undone any mapping work here,  mapwitch has just split a non-maintainable giant multipolygon stretching over thousands of kilometers, without doubts the largest riverbank polygon in the database, into smaller, easy to handle parts.  There is no loss in information and mapping work involved in that.  This is completely in line with established mapping practice world wide and a very positive contribution making future edits in the area much easier.
mapwitch (2018-08-07 17:32:57+00:00): I*ve done this work because the original MP had a note saying "This unmaintainable giant MP has to be split".
BladeTC (2018-08-07 18:48:53+00:00): They should have discussed with our local community, leaving a comment in one of the changesets used to create this multipolygon.
We would find have a way to approach the problem, and worked together to fix it.
I take care to preserve past works, like the relation 4110, but it was deleted.
I know this river is huge, but it is unique, by its nature and size. It has a relevance in the OSM to remain as it was.
imagico (2018-08-07 19:35:45+00:00): This is only unique in the way that this is the only place on Earth where anyone attempted to aggregate such a huge extent of riverbank mapping into a single multipolygon.  Most other places where this was tried elsewhere (which are very few) are all several orders of magnitude smaller and even there the multipolygon usually suffers from being constantly broken.

The fixme note for the Amazon riverbank multipolygon being too large and that it should be split was added half a year ago by me.  The first split into two parts happened two months ago in:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59875449

which was not ideal since it created two new relations instead of splitting off one from the existing one.  But dealing with this kind of giant MP relations is difficult so this is an understandable mistake.   mapwitch simply further split one of the parts (which was still extremely large on its own) into manageable chunks.

So this was not a surprising ad hoc edit, it was done in several steps over multiple months by several people based on mapping practice widely used also in this country.

And splitting large polygons for riverbanks or landuse into smaller ones is not something that usually requires advance discussion.  This is a good faith edit intended to make future mapping easier.

I think it is great that you care about the Amazon river mapping but you should recognize i think that those who have edited the riverbank polygons from abroad have done so with good intentions and good reasons for making their edits.
smaprs (2018-08-07 22:49:58+00:00): Next time please communicate good intentions of huge changes previously to local community, if there is one, in common channels: talk, osm-forum. And to previous editor. That's good practice, as told in OSM.
ファシズム (2018-11-07 01:01:10+00:00): Don't care for smaprs. He is a typical self-opinionated person.
ent8r (2018-08-02 12:47:08+00:00): Hallo!
Hast du wirklich alle Informationen vor Ort überprüft und wolltest du alles löschen was du gelöscht hast? Wenn du innerhalb einer Woche nicht antworten solltest, werde ich diesen Änderungssatz rückgängig machen müssen, da eine einfache Suche nach den Unternehmensnamen, bzw, deren Website eindeutige Ergebnisse liefern, die darauf schließen lassen, dass diese Läden noch vorhanden sind... Vielen Dank schonmal im Vorraus!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61293129
ent8r (2018-08-03 09:53:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61323839 where the changeset comment is:
Harel M (2018-09-08 09:24:31+00:00): Hi,
Adding subarea according to OSM documentation is redundant and disputed.
See here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
Geo spatial engines should be able to deduct subareas using their logic.
I suggest to remove this.
zstadler (2018-09-09 11:02:52+00:00): Hello Павел Гетманцев,

This is the same edit as in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55217428

You never responded to the comments in that changeset and it was reverted.

This changeset was reverted too.

Please avoid redoing this edit. 

You are invited to open a discussion with the local mappers.
Rich1234 (2018-08-05 04:40:08+00:00): Why was the tag "tourism=apartment" used for this node?  

"tourism=apartment" is meant for short term holiday vacation units (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=apartment), which this is not.

The proper tag here should have been building=apartment (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dapartments) which is mean for buildings containing plural residential units.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:26:50+00:00): Oke.. maar gebouwen niet zelf intekekend. Die worden via het forum (zie welkomstmail)  geimporteerd door het BAG team. Dien dus een verzoek in.
Streammz (2018-08-02 13:32:21+00:00): Oke, dat verklaart al die source:BAG tags. Ik zal het vermijden in de toekomst.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:44:20+00:00): Je hoeft niets te vermijden. Vraag in het draadje Verzoek BAGimport een import aan van het gebouw.
Dan komen de BAG gegevens vanzelf mee. 
Je zet dan de URL van hierboven erbij. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Doe je het zelf? Kun je gelijk eens op het forum rondneuzen.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:28:05+00:00): Waarom name= Sculpture 'Knowing by heart' Moet sculpture daar ook bij.?
Streammz (2018-08-02 13:35:24+00:00): Goed punt, een beetje dubbel op. Hij staat hier bekend als "Sculpture 'Knowing by Heart'" en word dus vaak benoemd met het woord Sculpture er bij, alleen is dat natuurlijk niet de officiele naam.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:46:26+00:00): Oke.. up to you.. Lokale kennis is belangrijk.
Je kunt ook naast name nog local_name= gebruiken voor gebouwen en kunstwerken zoals de lokale bevolking het noemt. Denk maar aan de Kolenkit in A'dam e.d.
viloan (2018-08-02 11:41:12+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Protoxenus (2018-08-16 20:44:23+00:00): Hallo, ich habe von den veröffentlichten Plänen den Verlauf der geplanten Straßen eingetragen. Du hast etwas dazu gemalt. Haben sich die Pläne geändert oder gibt es einen anderen Grund dafür?
KVLA-HRO-Mei (2018-08-17 07:48:51+00:00): Ich hatte das eigentlich von der Bahn aus gesehen, dass die Brücke aufgebaut wurde und deine bereits eingetragenen Strecken aktiviert und "angeschlossen".

Laut https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61295717 ist da aber eine zweite Linie entstanden, da muss ich mal schauen wie das kam :-/
ent8r (2018-08-02 13:00:15+00:00): Hallo!
Bitte gewöhne dir an, aussagekräftigere Changeset-Kommentare anstelle von irgendwelchen URLs anzugeben! So kann jeder andere gleich auf den ersten Blick feststellen worum es geht!
Vielen Danke schon einmal!
Philip Eichenauer (2018-08-02 13:10:12+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis,
hatte den Kommentar noch von einer vorherigen Änderung drin. Hat leider mit dieser Änderung nichts zu tun. Kann ich das noch nachträglich ändern?
ent8r (2018-08-02 13:12:39+00:00): Nein, dass kann man nicht mehr nachträglich ändern. Ist aber eigentlich auch nicht so schlimm wenn man es mal vergisst. Sollte nur nicht immer passieren :)
Theoretisch könntest du wenn du merkst, dass du den falschen Kommentar benutzt hast hier in dieses Feld einen Kommentar schreiben und dort mehr Infos hineinschreiben...
ma-rt-in (2019-07-09 21:52:46+00:00): Hallo,
war heute mal vor Ort. Wo sind den die Blitzer für die Ampeln? Hab da keinen gefunden.
vg
ma-rt-in (2019-07-10 08:27:29+00:00): Hallo,
hab mir an Hand von Mapillary die Ecke nochmals angesehen und finde dort keinen Blitzer für Rotlicht. Somit fliegt der jetzt raus.
vg
look4book (2019-07-10 08:32:20+00:00): wenn da keiner mehr ist  - umso besser!
mnegrini (2018-08-02 23:54:53+00:00): De straat is alleen in noordelijke richting  bereikbaar voor laad/losverkeer maar verder autovrij. Ik heb er een tweerichtingsweg van gemaakt met de tag 'motor_vehicle:forward:conditional=delivery @ (9:00-12:00)'
eggie (2018-08-02 13:16:06+00:00): Dit gebied van je edits is veel te groot. Door schuiven met de kaart met editor iD ontstaat vaak schade door onbedoelde verschuivingen. Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:18:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61296365#map=17/52.89802/4.74267&layers=C
Probeer je te beperken in het begin. Op veel wegen lopen fietsroutes.. Wanneer je de fietspaden gaat aanpassen verstoor je de routering van de routering. Graag reacteie
eggie (2018-08-02 13:20:49+00:00): Lopen hier wel fietspaden of is het een onderdeel van de rotonde zelf? Graag reactie? De fietspaden zijn al getagd als onroute bikelane.. cycleway=lane
eggie (2018-08-02 13:21:43+00:00): Je hebt hier de fietsroutes onderbroken.
Streammz (2018-08-02 13:27:27+00:00): > Dit gebied van je edits is veel te groot
Excuus, ik zal hier op letten.

> Lopen hier wel fietspaden of is het een onderdeel van de rotonde zelf? Graag reactie?

Deze fietspaden zijn fysiek naast de weg aanwezig sinds de herbouwing van de rotonde. Deze zijn afgezonderd van de weg (losse paden)

> Wanneer je de fietspaden gaat aanpassen verstoor je de routering van de routering. Graag reacteie
Hier was ik inderdaad niet van op de hoogte - Bedankt voor de oplettendheid. Ik heb mijzelf in het diepe gegooit waardoor ik zulk soort dingen over het hoofd heb gezien, en zal even kijken of ik dit nog kan corrigieren
dvdhoven (2018-08-02 13:32:16+00:00): Doe maar niet, ik heb de fietspaden bij de rotonde aangepast en de rcn (fietsknooppuntroute) 18-22 hersteld en over die fietspaden gelegd. Oa had je de fietspaden niet op de zijwegen verknoopt.
Verder heb je landuse aan gebouwen geplakt. Landuses worden nooit aan gebouwen en wegen geplakt, die blijven altijd los liggen. Ik heb nu de landuses weer los gemaakt van een aantal gebouwen
eggie (2018-08-02 13:41:10+00:00): Stream.. de rotonde is al opgelost door onze fietsroutespecialist. Vraag hem om advies als je routes tegenkomt. het beste kun je de fietskaartlayer aanzetten. dan ben je gewaarschuwd. In iD zijn routes maar moeilijk te zien.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:24:14+00:00): Oke
user_5359 (2018-08-02 19:31:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mueschel (2018-08-11 10:30:45+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM! 
I have to remarks here:

- you added the tag 'recycling:m' - seems like there are a few letters missing, could you check that?
- opening hours have to use a well-defined format so that they can be understood by software. Have a look to the Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Cheers, Jan
L'imaginaire (2018-08-02 20:17:02+00:00): Waarom precies vind je popinjay incorrect?
koninklijke (2018-08-02 21:06:05+00:00): Popinjay, going by the description*, uses artificial birds as target, while the handboogschutters -at least the ones I've admired- use a different, tubular, target; the tower and the cage are however indistinguishable on the photos. *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popinjay_(sport)
L'imaginaire (2018-08-02 21:34:32+00:00): We leren bij :-) 
Maar ik ben het alleszins met je eens dat popinjay heel dicht in de buurt komt, tagging lijkt me dus correct.
joost schouppe (2018-08-03 12:41:23+00:00): Zullen we hier een projectje rond doen?
https://github.com/osmbe/community_planning/issues/6
L'imaginaire (2018-08-03 13:48:11+00:00): Dat zou cool zijn!
koninklijke (2018-08-03 14:01:57+00:00): We should, if only to ensure that Flemish and Wallon usage develops somewhat in line with thinking in the Netherlands, France, Germany and the UK.

Couple of weeks ago noticed a discussion on forest and wood : going by my UK experience, 'woods' can be any couple of acres, while forest refers to centuries old or even 'neolithic ancient', often former nobleman's hunting ground; but is also used for 'mijnhout' forests - c.f. Epping Forest (6000 acres) and the New Forest (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Forest : not just trees, also pasture and heathland) v.s. Forestry Commission (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forestry_Commission) 'plantations'.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:22:44+00:00): Oke.. er is dus geen verbinding
Streammz (2018-08-02 13:28:35+00:00): Nee, inderdaad geen verbinding tussen fietspad en de straat die er naast ligt.
philippec (2019-01-31 11:38:07+00:00): Hello Vucodil,
tomorrow I will check the drinking water fountain in Solbosch.  Maybe the two others also.
You should know that the open data about drinking water fountains in Bussels is very bad.  Some years ago I checked everything in OSM.  People had been copying from the open data and from all kind of sources and from each other without verifying. You did a good job in mentioning that review is requested, but I am happy that you added only 4 points.  I always add a picture.
philippec (2019-02-02 19:48:47+00:00): The map you used was so inaccurate that it is wrong.  I will correct three fountains in OSM as soon as the pictures on Mapillary are available. The one in Flageyplein has probably been visited by a mapper.
Vucod (2019-02-05 19:58:54+00:00): I should have added that the info in this map had been completed by a survey. But I grant you that one was imprecisely placed.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:14:44+00:00): Je plakt het grass aan de gebouwen. Dat is niet wenselijk. het geeft schade aan de kaart.
Streammz (2018-08-02 13:23:01+00:00): Excuus, hier was ik niet van op de hoogte.
Zal ik dit weer aanpassen zodat er ruimte overblijft tussen de gebouwen en de omringende velden?
eggie (2018-08-02 13:38:38+00:00): Losmaken gaat met editor iD bijna niet.. Zal het even losmaken.
eggie (2018-08-02 13:38:52+00:00): Het is al los.
PT-53 (2018-08-04 05:20:19+00:00): Hallo  N_SCHW,
in Heufelden das gleiche:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.75379&lat=48.29587&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
Gnanasekaran Thoppae (2018-08-02 13:26:18+00:00): #salesforceslde
viloan (2018-08-02 13:24:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-08-02 13:35:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 16:40:01+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 23:14:05+00:00): check information here: https://npa.gov.spb.ru/SpbGovSearch/Document/20337.html
user_5359 (2018-08-09 03:37:44+00:00): Hello! Short question to the way of the stream Doyusi / Dojusi : Yo add the three tags
Old_name=Dojusi
name=Doyusi
old_name:en=Dojusi River
old_name:id	Sungai Dojusi
a) Is old_name correct ( I assumed alt_name, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name)
b) what is the meaning of key Old_name against old_name:en ?
Joseph E (2018-08-09 05:57:35+00:00): Oops, you are right, it should be old_name, thanks for catching that.
I'm using "old_name" for older spellings. Indonesian used the letter "j" more often in the past, due to Dutch influence I think. But in this case "alt_name" would also be fine, since it is still used on some government maps
chnav (2018-08-09 06:34:16+00:00): В Самарском сделано слишкром много highway=tertiary, это очень много для деревни 5000 населения. В стотысячных городах таких дорог меньше. Пожалуйста сами решите какая улица является центральной, остальные лучше пометить как residential, если их качество низкое - поменяйте surface, smoothness и т.д.
chnav (2018-08-09 06:38:43+00:00): Вот типичный пример - глухая грунтовая улочка обозначена как tertiary:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613346573
Она не ведет ни в соседний поселок, не является транзитной через Самарское и т.д.

Тут можно почитать подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification#.D0.9A.D0.BB.D0.B0.D1.81.D1.81.D0.B8.D1.84.D0.B8.D0.BA.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.BE.D0.B3_.D0.B2.D0.BD.D1.83.D1.82.D1.80.D0.B8_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.81.D0.B5.D0.BB.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8B.D1.85_.D0.BF.D1.83.D0.BD.D0.BA.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.B2
StephaneP (2018-09-11 19:40:39+00:00): Salut !
Je suis en train de finir de corriger les limites de vitesse qui étaient encore à 90Km/h sur la Loire-Atlantique.
Une personne du conseil départemental nous as dit que dans le 44 toutes les sections de dépassement étaient limitées à 80km/h. Pourtant, tu as indiqué 90km/h sur cette section : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561533839
Tu as fais cette modif en ayant été sur le terrain ou pas ?
A bientôt
Stéphane
l3BAM (2018-09-13 08:23:15+00:00): Stéphane,
C'est une erreur. Je me suis mélangé les pinceaux sur cette section que je connais mais qui n'a pas de panneau de limitation.
Je viens de corriger et te laisse poursuivre.

Merci de l'info et de ton travail.