piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
voschix (2015-12-10 10:07:00+00:00): Buildings in this changeset are generally shifted in position by about 4m in direction north with resect to PCN2006 photos. In addition the contents was already considerably out of date when imported. An example: way 130024210 was imported in 2011 and shows a previous industrial building. PCN2006 (!) photos show already the new buildings which are there now.
trial (2016-02-15 22:43:22+00:00): Chemin : Impasse des (59099764) : impasse des...
Il ne manquerait pas quelque chose ?
trial (2017-12-19 13:55:08+00:00): Je vois que the_knife a corrigé.
*Martin* (2015-11-15 20:47:27+00:00): aj na http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1753624 chyba osmc:symbol. Tiez klasicky?
NiCK_n17 (2015-11-16 07:43:00+00:00): V tejto lokalite som v zivote nebol. Asi som zakresloval nieco od znameho. Takze neviem potvrdit symbol
Roolet (2019-04-15 18:25:35+00:00): Привет! Мне интересно, почему здесь были убраны названия улиц, и поменяли на названия площади? Вот видна Велика Васильківська вулиця: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.413643&lng=30.525747&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2017-01-01&pKey=dh6VxKJwCKq9dvmPtFX_2A и Антоновича вулиця: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.4148035&lng=30.522509875000004&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2017-01-01&pKey=YahqbZH4-10pNDzzTOxcNg. Эти улицы продолжаются до бульвара Дружби Народів.
dudka (2019-04-16 07:10:03+00:00): На яких лініях я змінив назви вулиць? Важко сказати, що було зроблено більш ніж 7 років тому
Roolet (2019-04-16 17:08:39+00:00): Привет, Дудка, спасибо за быстрый ответ. Извиняюсь за то что не предоставил больше деталей. Я имею в виду площадь на 50.4123472, 30.5252592, а именно:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120235581
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8142245
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120235584
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114798541
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120235569
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290438691
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120235572

Я хотел бы смоделировать данные в соответствии с https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsquare. Спасибо!
dudka (2019-04-16 17:30:56+00:00): Ок, я не проти
Andreas Binder (2017-10-24 20:01:46+00:00): Könnte das maxheight=3.7 auf der Brücke http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24786417 evlt. ein maxweight=3.7 gewesen sein?
ac201 (2017-10-24 21:08:39+00:00): die maxheight habe ich nicht gesetzt, macht ja auf der Brücke auch keinen Sinn. Evtl. ist es von der Eisenbahnunterführung 500m weiter richtung Norden dahin "verrutscht". maxheight kann gelöscht werden, maxweight auf der Brücke kenne ich nicht, müßte nochmal vorbeischauen.
Viele Grüße
Andreas Binder (2017-10-25 18:27:54+00:00): Danke für die Info. Ich habe maxheight=3.7 entfernt. Wenn Du mal in der Gegend bist, wäre es super, wenn Du es vor Ort kontrollierst könntest. Grüße Andreas
Warin61 (2019-03-25 00:35:19+00:00): Hi,
These 'Rain Gauges' you have tagged as silos ... they don't appear to be what I would call 'silos'.

Are these weather monitoring rain gauges??? If so OSM has tags for them now 
man_made=monitoring_station

monitoring:weather=yes

weather:ombrometer=yes

(OSM evolves .. new tags get introduced so 'we' can make a better amp).

Regards.
is-zUser (2017-02-16 16:49:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24626276
Bitte dringend Umriss Korrektur!
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-29 09:37:37+00:00): Do you remember what is the meaning of 

addr:housenumber=405/7
addr:interpolation=odd

for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130415796 ?

Maybe it is "both 405 and 407 is here"?

Maybe it would be better to tag it as addr:housenumber=405,407 ?

Sorry for bothering you about the ancient edit.
Curran1980 (2020-09-29 18:11:01+00:00): These residential buildings are maisonettes, similar to flats but each have independent entrances,
i.e 405 at ground floor level, 407 is at first floor level (apart from it's entrance door which directly leads to a staircase to the first floor). So yes, 405 and 407 are in the same area.
ivanbranco (2025-06-08 20:25:26+00:00): Ciao kaitu,

ci sono 1749 elementi mappati con il solo tag note=*: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25I7

Sono lì da molti anni, tu riusciresti a correggerli?

es. "note = trail paint blaze on a rock, symbol red-white-red bars with black text "40""

"trail paint blaze" può essere indicato con "information=trail_blaze" oppure "information=route_marker"

"on a rock" può essere indicato con "support=rock"

"red-white-red bars with black text "40"" può essere indicato con "symbol=*" ecc.ecc.
kaitu (2025-06-12 14:02:17+00:00): fatto, almeno per il tag principale
os-emmer (2025-04-18 09:47:33+00:00): Hello stevea,
I have some questions about buildings you added 13 years ago:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4715581
Can you help me with this?
stevea (2025-04-18 15:32:09+00:00): The reason these are not seen in a particular image is because they are seasonal.  Somewhere around May-September, these are erected as temporary structures and staffed with lifeguards during the busy summer beach season.
os-emmer (2025-04-18 15:42:57+00:00): Ah ok, thanks for the clarification. I just updated the tagging for these lifeguard-stations and added an seasonal=summer.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165118574
stevea (2025-04-18 16:01:31+00:00): 👍
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-21 18:29:01+00:00): Skąd są te mezoregiony?

Na jakiej licencji są te dane dostępne?
Dotevo (2020-12-21 20:27:05+00:00): Wprowadzone były dawno temu:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=13844
Wydaje mi się, że było to rysowane z podkładem. Przez te lata trochę zmieniło się podejście do prac pochodnych. Pamiętam, że miałem jakiś czarno biały skan z chyba dość starej książki :/ możliwe, że to była ta:
Jerzy Kondracki: Regiony fizycznogeograficzne Polski, w: „Poznaj Świat” R. XII, nr 4 (137), kwiecień 1964


warto pewnie zainteresować się tym:
https://geoforum.pl/news/25816/opublikowano-nowe-granice-regionow-geograficznych
kocio (2015-07-27 16:02:03+00:00): Hej,

Czy w tym miejscu rzeczywiście jest jakiś pomnik, czy to mże pomyłka?:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1437647359
wajak (2015-07-28 07:18:56+00:00): Cześć, Raczej takiej pomyłki bym nie zrobił, ale to było 4 lata temu.
Sprawdziłem teraz na Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/40XnJ pomnik istnieje.
Matija Nalis (2023-04-01 00:01:04+00:00):  Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?
*Martin* (2015-10-19 17:28:09+00:00): nejako podozrivo rovne cesty v tom terene. je to ok?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130654142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130653666
PavolG (2015-10-19 17:40:01+00:00): Ano, je to OK, je to cesta vyjazdena po trase byvalej banskej lanovky. A ta sla rovno... ;-)
*Martin* (2015-10-19 19:25:12+00:00): parada :)
*Martin* (2015-12-29 21:05:43+00:00): Po dnesnom prieskume som tam tu cestu volajako nenasiel. Inac odkial su tie tracky? Vela si ich pokreslil, ale Bing ani Mapbox tam pokrytie nema a ani na NLC to velmi nesedi...
PavolG (2015-12-29 22:29:44+00:00): Tu cestu si ja pametam, ale je pravda ze uz su to riadne roky co som bol na rakosskej bani. A je jasne vidno aj na aktualnom bingu (kukni web) prierez v lese. Inak by som taku hatlaninu krizom cez kopec do mapy nedaval. Az tam nie je, feel free to delete.
Zvysok bude zarucene z bingu (pred casom bing znizil rozlisko) a mozno cast kapora. A ked dobre pametam, v tom roku bolo povolene este aj NLC. NLC navyse nejaky rok dozadu updatlo podklady na novsie...
Ak to nesedi s aktualnou realitou, vazne to zmaz.
user_5359 (2022-02-14 07:06:18+00:00): Hello! May I ask you for some support? What is the meaning of the both tags
autor="S.D"
creation=20-09-2011"?
Jrachi (2025-03-14 08:10:48+00:00): Ciao.
Ho pescato due vecchie relazioni dove hai inserito network= local.
Controlla anche gli altri tag, è passato molto tempo!

Ivo
dieterdreist (2025-03-14 09:09:57+00:00): sì, passato molto tempo. Ci sono stato altre volte di seguito, ma la situazione cambia (alle volta era chiusa una parte per frana, (ma i locali andavano comunque). Non saprei per gli altri tag, e non mi sembra nemmeno lineare, intanto quello che posso fare è correggere il tag lwn.
Jrachi (2025-03-14 09:28:54+00:00): Grazie!
Matija Nalis (2023-04-01 00:18:51+00:00):  Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site? or regular tourism=camp_site? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-25 13:08:26+00:00): 
Hello!

Sorry for bothering about an ancient edit.

But is PFM:garmin_type=0x3 meaning anything at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130808652/history ?

Can you remove this tag or replace by more clear one? It looks like debris from GPS trace import, handling similar tags on this object would be appreciated

(if there is more than one surviving tag like that from your edits: do you prefer separate message for each, list of all at once or something in between?)
AlaskaDave (2025-11-11 11:12:32+00:00): No problem, Mateusz.
Those are not my additions. And they're not RocketMan's either. I discovered those long ago and contacted the mapper who put them there and he told me he uses them for help in creating his customized Garmin-compatible maps and requested that I not delete them. And I did not.

I can't recall who it was now but seeing as I told him I wouldn't delete them, I leave the decision in your hands.

Dave
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-11 13:35:49+00:00): removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174511347
eggie (2017-10-25 11:03:52+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:35:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1441007660/history has access:foot that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?
joost schouppe (2015-07-02 13:30:53+00:00): Bedoel je hiermee enkel dat het privédomein is? Of is het ook een natuurreservaat? Enkel indien dat laatste juist is, verdien het de tag protected area. Zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area
ff5722 (2017-02-21 21:04:44+00:00): What is the meaning behind points like these that you have uploaded? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1442483944
Sunng (2017-02-22 02:23:40+00:00): @ff5722 你好，这个有什么问题吗？
ff5722 (2017-02-22 19:08:37+00:00): 我的意思是名字例如'name=TP000045'
如果点有没有用，这只是数据库污染。
Sunng (2017-02-23 02:41:38+00:00): 嗯，这很可能是当时编辑器导入 GPS 轨迹时自动引入了名字。Feel free to correct it.
ff5722 (2017-02-23 18:08:19+00:00): 嗯 可以，我会清它
eggie (2017-09-20 14:48:16+00:00): PB met opnieuw welkom gestuurd
gymate (2024-03-15 20:58:50+00:00): Köszi, a 1443986212-es node-dal jelzett problémát bejelentettem a Járókelőn: https://jarokelo.hu/bejelentesek/budapest/140950/hibas-utcanevtablak
joost schouppe (2016-11-09 11:15:14+00:00): way 131205895 looks very small to be a dog park. Wouldn't this rather be a dog toilet?
eMerzh (2016-11-20 14:02:48+00:00): mmh yeah probably...
but not really sure how i'm supposed to map them ... can't find anything
joost schouppe (2016-11-20 17:15:45+00:00): meh, there's amenity=dog_toilet, potty_area or pet_relief_area
I don't really like any of them, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-November/030564.html
I'll try and follow up...
marc__marc (2018-10-22 15:55:37+00:00): Hello,
I'm trying to understand the meaning of those objects
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125748710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104858884
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131293713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87337183
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131290686
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135796225

is it :
A substation to step-up or step-down the voltage https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsubstation
or
a generator that converts one form of energy to another
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dgenerator
?

Since there are 6 of them in the village, I guess that they are substations. so I deleted the tag related to the generator. do not hesitate to inform me if my guess is incorrect

Regards,
Marc
stefanct (2021-01-24 21:47:31+00:00): Hi, du hast hier in der Gegend einen ganzen Haufen amenity=water hinterlassen. Wäre super, wenn du die mal eindeutig machen könntest mit spring oder drinking_water, falls du dich noch erinnern kannst.
BeKri (2017-11-28 22:29:47+00:00): Servus Herr Spitzbergen,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131291298
Diese Daten, die Du nicht gelöscht haben möchtest stehen jetzt bald 6 Jahren drin ..
bekommen die noch eine Hausnummer oder sollen das andere erledigen ?
Gruß derBeKri
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:35:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1445262540/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
uks (2015-07-17 05:53:38+00:00): Что подразумевается под stage=* ? Количество этажей? Если да, то обозначать надо через  building:levels=* .
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-14 15:35:32+00:00): revertido
Matija Nalis (2023-03-30 19:17:16+00:00): Hi, I've seen you've been adding tag "camp=yes" in Haiti in 2011, do you know what was the meaning of that tag? Is there documentation? I'm trying to document it on the wiki based on discussion here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-document-tagging-mistakes-on-wiki-undocumented-duplicated-tags/97518
jaakkoh (2023-04-03 08:05:27+00:00): These where camps related to providing temporary(?) housing for those people who lost their homes in the 2010 earthquake. Given Haiti's situation one would need to resurvey the area (or use newer imagery) to verify if those camps still exist or not. 

I'm not surprised if/that the tag would/is not documented. Needs to be remembered that this was a time when humanitarian mapping was very much in early days of the making.

As background: I lived in Haiti 2010-2013 and was closely involved with HOT mapping in Haiti that time so I have a pretty good understanding of how things where them -- but not anymore as I haven't been active with HOT/OSM in about 7 years or so.
Supaplex (2017-08-20 11:16:46+00:00): 加上售圖好像怪怪的
literan (2023-01-06 09:42:45+00:00): привет, я же правильно понимаю, что в Москве маршрутки больше не ходят, и этот маршрут можно удалять?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1769931
Felis Pimeja (2023-01-06 19:02:30+00:00): Да. Можно грохать.
fgouget (2017-12-02 00:31:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Les permissions des voies de ce changeset posent problème : access=yes implique hgv=yes (camions), motorcycle=yes, hazmat=yes (transport de matières dangereuses), etc.

Y a-t-il des véhicules qui n'ont pas le droit de circuler ? La surface étant du sable les voitures ont-elles réellement le droit de circuler ?

Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Transport_mode_restrictions
Matija Nalis (2023-04-01 00:07:41+00:00):  Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe alias for amenity=refugee_site ? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?
Buster452 (2023-08-24 16:48:02+00:00): Are you sure this node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1450157774
Is really a monument?  On the topo maps it says monument there, but that is part of a "Monument Boundary" line on the topo map.   An old boundary for the Death Valley National Monument before those mining areas were absorbed into the national monument.
eggie (2018-04-01 14:20:34+00:00): Na tijden weer aan het mappen, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze.. opnieuw.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mcld (2015-01-01 19:49:08+00:00): Just been round Totley, so I'm updating a couple of features. Good mapping around here already though, lots of accurate detail - thanks Meersbrook!
eggie (2019-05-23 15:02:11+00:00): Na jaren weer een edit, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen... Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-08-06 19:49:56+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
GerdP (2015-11-14 21:04:47+00:00): Please review:
What was meant with surface=b ?
way 132054219
Hendrik75 (2015-11-15 08:42:12+00:00): It is an error, it means nothing. Thank you for pointing that out, i deleted it.
GerdP (2015-11-15 08:47:35+00:00): OK, thanks for the feedback.
naoliv (2016-02-21 17:31:50+00:00): Fernanda, você lembra o que utilizou como fonte para o nome das ruas?
GerdP (2015-10-21 15:50:52+00:00): please review:
would it be okay to change highway=racetrack to highway=raceway so that it is rendered in the map?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-10-21 16:12:05+00:00): No, I do not think it is for motorized races.
We do not tag for the renderer

But we should investigate what it is and if it has a name.

And maybe the area could be tagged with a leisure tag.
GerdP (2015-10-21 16:27:20+00:00): okay, I thought it is used for motocros
In fact I try to repair typos in highway tags,
I am not so much concerned about rendering.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-10-21 16:58:51+00:00): If you think it is for motocross, then go ahead and use racetrack.

I am no expert of motocross. I would just think that motocross would leave a bigger mark on the ground. But maybe the aerial was made just before the season. Then again is it not a bit small for motocross?
GerdP (2015-10-21 17:11:32+00:00): yes, a used motocross trail looks very different.
Seems you also don't know what it is (now)?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-10-21 17:13:30+00:00): I have no idea. I tried to search the net, but nothing came up.

But it has been there for four years now, so it must be somewhat permanent.
AsgerFrank (2015-10-22 18:46:57+00:00): Aerials at www.faxekommune.dk/faxe-kommune-kort reveal the track is established between 2002 and 2004.
But judging from subsequent development, as well as the current OSM-imagery, to me it definitely looks abandoned, not in use the latest several years.
GerdP (2015-10-22 18:58:18+00:00): so maybe it is a highway=abandoned now?
AsgerFrank (2015-10-22 19:32:29+00:00): Apparently, according to the wiki, the key racetrack is not recommended  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/racetrack  
Raceway should be right for a track of any motorized sport; looks to me as such, moped possibly. 
I'd suggest abandoned:highway=raceway
GerdP (2015-10-22 19:46:40+00:00): yes, fine with me
d1g (2015-07-06 11:42:57+00:00): Правил медучереждения, но только сейчас обратил внимание что тег amenity=doctors уже снимался: там салон красоты в основном, тег больше shop=beauty подойдёт?
Butt (2015-07-06 18:16:42+00:00): Думаю да. Там. Странное название было это смущало. Но по ыакту там салон красоты
Warin61 (2016-02-08 04:37:24+00:00): Hi'
Way 132327313 tagged sport=netbal corrected to netball. I have also separated out the courts to individual courts.. and added others as shown by bing imagery.
GerdP (2023-08-29 06:42:06+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich mappe gerade die Wegweiser entlang der neu ausgeschilderten Route "Schwäbische Alb Radweg".
Dabei stoße ich in Gnannenweiler auf die Routen "Alb Aktiv Tour" und "Meteor & Wälder Tour"
https://www.osm.org/relation/1789745
https://www.osm.org/relation/1778119
Auf den Wegweisern steht jeweils nur "Alb Aktiv" bzw. "Meteor Wälder", also ohne den Zusatz "Tour". So finde ich es auch auf der Homepage von z.B. https://www.heidenheimer-brenzregion.de/  
War das damals anders, als Du die Relationen angelegt hast? Nach meinem Verständnis sollte das "Tour" raus aus den Namen der Relation.
MiPri (2023-08-29 16:06:53+00:00): Hallo GerdP,

Die Bezeichnungen sind nicht so richtig konsequent. Es gibt die "Höhlen Tour", die "Kliff Tour" einerseits und die "Meteor & Wälder" (ohne "Tour") andererseits.

Und auch innerhalb der Beschreibungen ist die Bezeichnung nicht immer durchgängig. Die "Alb Aktiv" wird im Beschreibungstext auf https://www.heidenheimer-brenzregion.de beispielsweise als "AlbaktivTour" (ohne Leerzeichen) bezeichnet.

Wie es damals war, als ich die Routen angelegt habe, kann ich nicht mehr sicher sagen, aber ich meine, das "Tour" war damals enthalten.

Ich persönlich finde den Zusatz "Tour" auch hilfreich, als Kennzeichnung eines konkreten, fertig geplanten Tourenvorschlags, und zur Unterscheidung von einem "allgemeinen" Radweg wie z.B. dem Donauradweg.
GerdP (2023-08-29 16:13:48+00:00): OK, dann werde ich wohl die Hinweise zu den unterschiedlichen  Namen in die Relation reinpacken.
user_5359 (2016-11-18 09:21:22+00:00): Hallo, Dein Eintrag ist wohl schon etwas her, aber hast Du etwas dagegen, dass wir den Schützverein (St. Hubertus Bogenschützen) mit club=sport, sporting=shooting (wie jetzt üblicher ist) kennzeichnen?
tyr_asd (2016-02-22 08:16:17+00:00): Hi. Wurde dieser mechanische Edit (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct) irgendwo diskutiert und dokumentiert? Ich kann keine Infos dazu finden.

Außerdem finde ich nicht, dass das Semikolon-getrennte Tag "shop=books;stationery" sehr passend ist.

--

English: Where can I find the discussion and documentation about this mechanical edit?
Walter Schlögl (2016-02-22 17:55:20+00:00): You are right, I think this change was not correct and can be reverted, if possible.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-27 21:15:28+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83946759/history has hw=separate_opposite key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 13:46:30+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1210955087/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
user_3643552 (2022-01-18 05:56:33+00:00): Wivern Hill
fkv (2019-02-16 09:30:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67249310 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512151
fkv (2019-02-16 09:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67249283 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512286
fkv (2019-02-16 09:13:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67248981 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512294
fkv (2019-02-16 09:14:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67249000 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512301
fkv (2019-02-16 09:15:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67249031 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512310
fkv (2019-02-16 09:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67249056 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512327
fkv (2019-02-16 09:18:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67249077 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512339
fkv (2019-02-16 09:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67249136 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512392
fkv (2019-02-16 09:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67249145 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512415
fkv (2019-02-16 09:22:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67249174 where the changeset comment is: revert 9512426