piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Alexey Lukin (2020-09-11 03:36:46+00:00): I don't know if it's worth splitting platforms into "covered" and "normal" sections. I'd need to read on that or ask the community. I've left them uncovered because the majority of the platform area is not under the building.
user_8466505 (2020-09-11 04:32:42+00:00): Whenever I map covered parking aisles, I use the “split technique” as shown here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839278555/

Best regards,
TheAdventurer64
Alexey Lukin (2020-09-11 13:44:29+00:00): Split is great for linear objects, like roads, but I haven't seen it used for areas, like platform areas. Is there an example?
ACarlotti (2020-08-18 21:52:53+00:00): I think there are issues with most of the changes in this changeset.
1. The southbound carriageway through the junciton with Kings Hedges Road is not under construction, and is not being changed as part of these works (though there is a slight change to the kerb line further north). This stretch of road is also still open to cyclists, and to vehicles accessing the Darwin Green site.
2. The section immediately south of Kings Hedges Road is not a cycleway. It is secondary road that is temporarily closed to most traffic (but still open to cyclists and vehicles accessing Darwin Green - the access to Darwin Green is why I didn't add access=no tags here).
3. I think the direction=both tag you added to the traffic calming on Windsor Road is unecessary, and I can't find anything on the wiki to suggest that this tag needed to be added.
4. I don't think changes you made at the junction with Victoria Road are particularly accurate or helpful - they don't really match either the current or future routes for cyclists.
5. I have no idea where you got "approx July 2021" from - it isn't in the latest construction update I've seen. The scheduled completion dates are different for different phases of the work.

I think this best thing to do with this changeset is to revert it entirely, and then perhaps add more accurate tags to the bits of Histon Road that are temporarily oneway.
msohnius (2020-08-19 03:11:23+00:00): You're probably right; I'll look into it, but at a more civilised hour!
msohnius (2020-08-19 03:16:29+00:00): As for your Point 5, see: https://www.greatercambridge.org.uk/transport/transport-projects/histon-road/histon-road-construction section "Construction Details", plus communication to residents that the southbound closure will be in place throughout this period.
ACarlotti (2020-08-19 03:23:13+00:00): I looked at that page but failed to see the schedule completion date above the table. The table itself gives estimated end dates of Spring 2021 for Phase B+C and Summer 2021 for Phase D.
msohnius (2020-08-19 12:54:58+00:00): Your points in detail: 
1. Changed to highway=Construction with access=Destination (to cater for Darwin Green) and bicycle=yes
2. ditto
3. removed the tag again
4. similar to 1, which reflects the situation on the ground
5. see above, plus road signage advising "Summer 2021" as re-opening date
ACarlotti (2020-08-25 22:11:31+00:00): I still don't think that works. Using "highway=construction" and "access" tags is ambiguous, and I would normally interpret this to be indicating the access arrangements once the road is open. I had a look at instances of this tagging elsewhere, and it looks like my interpretation is the most common one in the areas I found. If you want to indicate that the access is temporarily restricted, then I would just add appropriate access tags. Your changes also broke Graphopper's cycle routing.

I've mostly reverted your changes (in changeset 89936254) because I still think the tagging is wrong (and routing was visibly broken). It might be possible to improve the accuracy of the tags at each end of Histon Road, but the way you tried doing it doesn't quite work. Personally I'd favour just leaving it tagged as open because the short stretch of inaccuracy doesn't affect anywhere that someone would actually want to drive to or from.
msohnius (2020-08-26 09:40:14+00:00): Fine with me; you make some very good points, particularly about cycle routes.  I was mainly interested in having the route appear as closed visually, which seems to be impossible for a road that is temporarily closed due to construction but not itself under construction.  (At least at the moment, the southern end of Histon Rd is indeed "under construction" - I can hear the noise from the work every night through my bedroom window!)
pio2_122 (2020-10-20 20:45:13+00:00): Cześć,
Dlaczego do komendy powiatowej PSP w Mońkach dodałeś tag amenity=fire_station?
Ten tag służy do oznaczania jednostek JRG, OSP, ZSP, WSP, LSRG, itp. - czyli jednostek ratowniczo-gaśniczych. Komendy powiatowe, wojewódzkie i miejsce nie są takimi jednostkami, ponieważ nie pełnią bezpośrednio ww. funkcji. Stąd wydaje mi się, że powinno się je oznaczać jako office=government, bez amenity=fire_station.
arturp (2020-10-21 07:35:30+00:00): Cześć,
Twoja uwaga jest zasadna, aczkolwiek mam z tym pewne wątpliwości - mianowicie zasoby (siły i środki) z jednostek typu KP/KM, KW czy KG też biorą bowiem bezpośredni udział w działaniach - najczęściej w obszarze dowodzenia, natomiast statystycznie w znacznie mniejszej ilości zdarzeń niż wymienione przez Ciebie rodzaje jednostek. Czy to aby oznaczać je jako office=government to Twoja propozycja, czy może była na ten temat jakaś dyskusja w OSM?
pio2_122 (2020-10-23 20:58:32+00:00): Jest to mój pomysł/propozycja tagowania. W ostatnim czasie nie spotkałem się z żadną dyskusją na temat tagowania JOP.

Przede wszystkim kierowałem się odniesieniem funkcji do definicji z wiki:
amenity=fire_station - „Used to tag a fire station: a facility from which a fire brigade operates to fight fires.”
office=government - „In these offices, staff work directly for the government and carry out tasks to administer facilities, operate registries and licensing bureaus, regulate lands and/or people, etc.”
arturp (2020-11-03 12:58:55+00:00): Przyjmuję Twoje argumenty i faktycznie chyba jednak lepiej będzie opisywać KM/KP PSP według Twojego pomysłu.
Jan Wilts (2020-08-18 20:24:19+00:00): Oh van deze tag was ik helemaal niet op de hoogte; zal ik in de toekomst gebruiken!
smootheFiets (2020-08-18 21:09:02+00:00): Leuk, zo leren wij allebei! Ik kende shelter_type=public_transport niet :)
smootheFiets (2021-02-02 17:03:51+00:00): Het is overigens separate, niet seperate (a ipv e) :)

Ik ben er een tegengekomen, bij de v. K. Verschuurlaan. Vervolgens heb ik alles in de buurt van Groningen per Overpass aangepast:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98591243

Het was trouwens een plezier om in die buurt te mappen: alles keurig uitgelijnd, sidewalk's, stoplichten, ... Alles jouw werk, vermoed ik (heb het niet en detail gechecked). Top!
ACarlotti (2020-08-18 21:19:05+00:00): Why did you edit relation 1016554 in this changeset?
msohnius (2020-08-19 02:56:20+00:00): By mistake.  Corrected it.
ACarlotti (2020-08-19 02:59:49+00:00): I suspected so. Thanks!
limmmoh (2020-08-18 14:14:10+00:00): Added a Residential Road according to Private Maxar Imagery
trigpoint (2024-07-14 13:50:16+00:00): Hi, what sources were you using for this edit?

A number of thing have gone very wrong with this changeset however.
1. Th smallest amount of research would have shown that in the UK maxspeed should be tagged with the mph suffix. 
2. Maxspeed:goods has only been used here in the UK, there is a tag maxspeed:hgv which could be used.
3. You have added a maxspeed of 50, which is incorrect. The maxspeed here is 60 mph. You should break other use cases to suit your use case.
4. Where did 50 come from? Did you intend kph or mph but what source did you use here.
5. Had you used the maxspeed:hgv tag then that should have been 40 mph.
6. Smoothness = intermediate seems very wrong, however what was the source?

Cheers Phil
123cargo_user (2024-08-05 13:03:36+00:00): Indeed there are o couple of wrong information in this changeset, but:
1. If you had looked at my other changesets made in UK area you would have seen that I used the speed limits in mph correctly. These edits were made in the same period I was aiming to make some changesets in Ireland. My mistake was that I probably didn't realize in which country I made the changesets. This explanation also applies to points 3, 4 and 5.
2. Fair enough
6. It is a changeset made 4 years ago, it is normal that the quality of the road has improved in the meantime.
trigpoint (2024-08-06 07:45:58+00:00): I have corrected the maxspeed tag to 60 mph and changed maxspeed:goods to maxspeed:hgv.

Cheers Phil
Jerry Jorts (2020-08-18 22:18:05+00:00): Nuk esht nevoja ti vendosesh emrin "Pallat" nje ndertese(zakonisht nuk esht nevoja fare per emer). Edhe perdor Square tool ku te mundesh.
Mondi25Mondi (2020-08-19 08:07:23+00:00): Zakonisht cdo ndertese ka emrin e vete por ktu eshte lemsh apo akoma e pa percaktuar.
Por flm gjithsesi.
Jerry Jorts (2020-08-19 15:30:58+00:00): Shumica e ndertesave ne Tirane nuk kan emer. Gjithsesi nuk prish pune emri "Pallat" thjesht esht i panevojshem dhe duket keq estetikisht. Po pate ndonje pyetje per ndonje gje me thuaj.
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-11 17:31:51+00:00): One of my favorite OSM finds 😂
Jan Mathys (2020-09-11 17:44:36+00:00): Darf ich frage, warum du den Name des Waldes auf Schurmbruch gesetzt hast, obwohl er auf den Karten Scheunenbruch heißt?
mapbear66 (2021-04-04 12:45:54+00:00): Hi, Why are you marking this and all  highway=track/path's you add as access=no ?
CantrayJDW (2021-04-04 13:47:42+00:00): Hi Mapbear66,

Good question!
I have struggled with this, but reading the very detailed wiki for 'Key:access': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access, and the more helpfull 'Tag:access=no' https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno, I gathered that we are dealing with legal access, and that 'access=no' signifies that the there is no general legal right of access.  In Scotland of course this is modified by the Scottish access rights: Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003. Hence I would normally change the foot/car/cycle/horse access. To quote - access=no is 'overridden by more specific access tags'.  Anyone using the track or path must obey the Scottish Outdoor Access Code. That gives landowners the legal right to close the track/path for certain purposes - e.g. shooting.
But if there is better guidance for Scotland, I would like to see it.

Regards,
mapbear66 (2021-04-04 14:29:32+00:00): Ah, good! I feared you were adding it without thought. 
There are a couple of issues I can see: 
Some renderers wont show  the track/paths. 
Routing apps see the access=no and wont route along those ways. 

Your other tags are fine, and it's useful info. 

My thinking is the Land Reform Scotland act says we have a legal right, with various exclusions, of access. So as far as I can see those tracks and paths, do have a legal right of access. Permission doesn't have to be explicitly given  to those particular paths or tracks.
CantrayJDW (2021-04-04 15:45:50+00:00): Do you think access=permissive is right then?
I would agree that access=yes would be OK for actual 'rights of way'. These exist in Scotland usually well signed but are not common.
mapbear66 (2021-04-04 15:59:36+00:00): A permissive path is where the land owner has allowed access where no other rights exist - like in England. That's not the case here. We have a default legal right of access. So no, it is not appropriate either. 

OSM is all about what is on the ground. You do not have to say what something's legal status is. 

I would not add any access tag at all.
CantrayJDW (2021-04-04 16:14:25+00:00): OK, I have looked at some of the 44 pages on the forum. I am not the only one struggling! 

Gates are even more important.
Probably best to comment.

Easiest is to remove tags as you say.  I'll try and do that in due course.

Thanks.
CantrayJDW (2021-04-04 16:29:40+00:00): One area which needs more care is roads over hydro dams. These really do need to be permissive, with a comment. or closed if they are.
berndw (2020-08-20 10:58:22+00:00): Hallo Rød Rev

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap
Ich habe im Moment nur einen Hinweis.
Bevor Du Lageänderungen in der Region vornimmst, z.B. zum Verändern des Verlaufs von Wegen oder an Landnutzung arbeitest, stelle bitte Deine Hintergrundbilder  auf ESRI um. Diese sind zwar nicht ganz so aktuell wie die von Bing aber wesentlich genauer in der Lage.

Ansonsten wünsche ich Dir weiterhin viel Spaß bei OSM, für Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung

Bernd
JarkinPipa (2020-08-19 06:50:23+00:00): Revert needed. bicycle=use_sidepath should be used instead of bicycle=no.
Jrachi (2025-03-14 07:20:14+00:00): Ciao.
Hai inserito la relazione 5.
Ma si tratta di un percorso escursionistico (route=hiking) o ippico (network=lhn)?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:network=lhn

Ivo
frasty (2025-03-14 08:54:04+00:00): Ciao,
mi devo essere sbagliato, è in effetti network=lwn. Ho corretto, grazie!

ciao
Frncesco
dvdhoven (2020-08-19 07:00:28+00:00): Je kunt niet zomaar een gat hakken om een barriere zichtbaar te maken. Dan routeert er niks meer. Er loopt hier een fietsroute en een wandelroute. Ik heb de weg weer doorverbonden en er een normale bollard op gezet.
Dat werkt op duizenden andere plekken in OSM en dus ook hier
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-08 18:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147229399, 147229339 where the changeset comment is: revert data added by mapper who used swear words for names claiming to be the 'discoverer' of places
Filohipo (2020-08-28 01:13:27+00:00): Olá
A sul da Etar de Vila Franca de Xira desenhaste uma linha de água que não consigo visualizar nas fotos consultadas.
Que fonte usaste ?
Cumprimentos
F
lalolan (2020-08-28 16:49:23+00:00): Estive a tentar encontrar mas as linhas de água são às dezenas na zona. Se ativares a opção "Dados do mapa" no botão de "Camadas" aqui no site do OSM (sem ser no modo editar) e selecionares a linha de água em questão pode-se ver na barra de endereço do browser o link dessa linha para eu saber qual delas é. Exemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460980083 Posso assegurar que foi de uma das camadas de imagens de satélite disponíveis no editor iD.
Filohipo (2020-08-29 11:16:25+00:00): A única linha de água que cruza a Avenida dos Gaibéus, imediatamente a sul da Etar VFX. Poderei indicar o link se não a conseguires encontrar.
lalolan (2020-08-29 15:38:29+00:00): Obrigado. A linha de água original foi feita pelo "Rúdisicyon". Ver por exemplo um dos nós que não alterei: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6842059303/history

Estava desenhada a todo o comprimento e atravessava localizações "a direito em linha" reta pela autoestrada e a ferrovia, Como eu estava a fazer correções na autoestrada (desnivelar as linhas que não se deviam cruzar), tentei encontrar a localização correta pelas imagens de satélite. A mais nítida parece ser a "Imagem Global ESRI (claridade) versão beta" (é a 1ª no editor iD). Conforme se pode ver existem locais que parecem ser a passagem de um curso de água, ver por exemplo em https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/38.96577/-8.98153 que mostra o que parece ser uma ponte típica na ferrovia sobre uma pequena linha de água. Outro local mais ao lado: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/38.96682/-8.98343 nessa imagem não digo que seja impossível, mas dificilmente será um caminho pedonal, tendo as características de uma linha de água ladeada por muros.

A certa altura do curso, mais perto do rio Tejo não mexi porque não se percebe por onde passa o curso de água.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:45:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89582531
cabinetcourbi (2020-08-22 12:04:01+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est une vue de l'esprit de rendre jointifs tous les polygones dans OpenStreetMap. Il est bon lorsqu'il y a une voirie qui contitue une frontière de ne pas rendre jointif ce polygone avec l'autre landuse de l'autre côté de la voirie.
Le 100% viendra un jour.
Bon week-end.
literan (2020-08-18 15:29:39+00:00): на building:part разбили, а теги здания на основном полигоне забыли оставить https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838270577/history

я вам в форуме привел ссылку на страничку с примерами многоуровневых зданий, там все наглядно расписано.

а отношение type=building это какая-то ненужная фигня. Для чего оно, непонятно
vasony (2020-09-05 21:51:23+00:00): please note that access=no means: forbidden for cars, bicycles, pedestrians ect. so for this situation is not valid.
maraf24 (2020-08-18 17:28:59+00:00): "roku" zabrakło w nazwie :)
jaap de vries (2020-08-25 07:13:07+00:00): Jammer dat je de parkeerplaats van Ahold aan de Linie niet meer te zien is op de kaart omdat je het bouwterrein fase 2 hebt toegevoegd. Waarom heb je dit gedaan? 
Werk je voor Park15? Ik kom hier regelmatig in opdracht van Park15 voor allerlei landmeetkundige opdrachten.
user_2061200 (2020-08-25 10:13:42+00:00): Weet niet waar je het over hebt, maar waar nu fase 2 staat. is er helemaal geen parkeerplaats van Ahold, deze is op het terrein zelf.
waar ik nu fase 2 in construction heb staan, wordt momenteel bouwrijp gemaakt.
via link: https://park15.nl/ 
kunt u zien welke kavels verkocht zijn, echter worden deze kavels nu bouwrijp gemaakt.
user_2061200 (2020-08-25 10:16:55+00:00): Heb echter ook helemaal geen parkeerplaatsen verwijdert, je loopt nu mij van iets te beschuldigen dat er nooit heeft gestaan!
jaap de vries (2020-08-25 13:41:03+00:00): Beste,
Jammer dat je zo de reageert. Ik vroeg enkel wat. Ik kan zien dat er iets veranderd is. Nu zie ik dat er een parkeerplaats staat op de kaart die helemaal niet strook met het gene wat ik heb ingemten ter plekke met Leica total station en had ingetekend, Ik kom als sinds de oprichting van Park 15 op het terrein, ongeveer vanaf 2010 met allerlei voorafgaand landmeet werk. De Lidl, Nanbuurs, Terlouw, de aansluitingen bij de Balverenlaan, de rotonde, Shell ed ik heb allemaal  gemeten
Firma vd Bijl en Heierman heeft hier de parkeerplaats aangelegd in opdracht van VGP group. Achter deze parkeerplaats komt een hele grote distributiehal voor de AH en Etos van de Ahold groep. 
Ik zie dat er ook vele relaties zijn verwijderd, ik zal een revert moeten doen. Evt zal ik je parkeerplaats verbeteren
user_2061200 (2020-08-25 16:29:48+00:00): Helaas kan je mededelen dat deze parkeerplaats momenteel amper klaar is en waar jij de uitgang aanduid, staan momenteel de bouwketen en andere bouwmaterialen.
Pas wanneer deze klaar is en via luchtfoto's te zien is zou je eigenlijk pas deze wijzigingen mogen toepassen.
Over Ahold, deze zitten al met hun bezorgingsdienst in het al opgeleverde pand aan de overkant van de parkeerplaats.
user_2061200 (2020-08-25 16:35:24+00:00): Hoe ik dit allemaal weet: Ik woon zelf in Lent en kom er bijna iedere week. Ben er vandaag nog langsgereden en zag met eigen ogen dat de parkeerplaats maar voor 40% af was.
Deze parkeerplaats heb ik niet uit openstreetmaps verwijdert, deze stond er tot op heden er niet op.

Wat ik me afvraag, waarom staat de subway, febo en de carwash er nog niet in.
user_2061200 (2020-08-25 16:41:51+00:00): @jaap de Vries over welke forum heb jij het?
Dan kan ik proberen om met de persoon in kwestie in contact te komen, omtrent het importeren van woningen, etc
jaap de vries (2020-08-27 12:16:22+00:00): Beste,

Ik heb de revisie tekeningen van de aangelegde parkeerplaats als u interesse heeft. Deze is voor de bouwvak geheel opgeleverd. Tevens is er al met het aanleggen van de rotonde al een uitrit gemaakt, de uit bestaande asfaltbitumen weg ligt er al. Deze week zal de begroeiing worden aangeplant door de eerder benoemde firma.
letihu (2021-02-15 20:03:39+00:00): tags fehlen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838283102/history
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-08-19 04:47:18+00:00): Just noticed this lately that you've mapped your personal location (though it's hidden). You take seriously edits adding personal info, but here, you've added yourself on the map. Gonna delete that (I'm currently restoring jeepney routes, and fixing those you've retagged as route=share_taxi)
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-08-19 05:09:09+00:00): Deleted, except office. Also removed note on home. How bad, the smell of hypocrisy.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-08-20 18:51:51+00:00): Also read this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information, especially in regards to details inside homes. You could make an indoor map of malls if you want, but it's a real challenge to map each stall (mapping POIs and corridors can be enough)
stephankn (2020-09-06 07:40:33+00:00): way 838283380 is a service road to the hospital, not a tertiary highway. On top of that you simply added this on top of already mapped roads. This is the second time I see such a misuse of tags from you. Please respect the tagging of the OSM community. If you are not willing to follow the mapping standards we have to revert all your edits.
user_2066394 (2020-08-18 19:09:12+00:00): Offizieller Name jeweils vermutlich anders?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dfarm
user_2066394 (2020-08-18 19:14:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle_road
AD_Baldham (2020-08-21 16:02:35+00:00): Klassifiziierung geändert, Ich hoffe es stimmt jetzt so.
emvee (2020-09-06 13:15:53+00:00): If this is really a footway, please also remove cycleway=shared and do the same for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26482564

Greetings,

Martin.
carstenhag (2020-09-06 13:18:52+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2311776, all of these ways need to be checked :/.
I think the way you linked is actually for both pedestrians and cyclists.
zstadler (2021-03-04 17:02:35+00:00): Hello Ola_Alaa,

In this edit you have removed the "colour=black" tag of 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552864987
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316038571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316038574
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405885059

The "colour" tag is part of the mapping conventions for hiking and biking trails in Israel
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Conventions_for_Hiking_and_Biking_Trails

In the future, please avoid deleting this tag.

Thanks,
Zeev
Ola_Alaa (2021-03-07 18:03:30+00:00): Hello zstadler,
Thank you for this comment, am
very sorry for this mistake as I was mapping in area near to these in Egypt, and I just mapping inside Egypt, so I will be sure in the future editing not to do this again.
Regards,
Ola
zstadler (2021-03-07 18:43:20+00:00): Thanks!
Leo Slager (2020-08-19 06:21:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2020-08-19 06:28:13+00:00): Dag Wistaire,
Vaak geldt voor het eenrichtingsverkeer een uitzondering voor fietsers en bromfietsers.
Dan graag tovoegen:
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:mofa=no
oneway:moped=no
Wistaire (2020-08-19 09:14:41+00:00): Aangepast, bedankt voor de info.
Akkurator (2020-08-20 12:04:14+00:00): Hallo mmeusel,
du hast hier die Adressen Haslachstr 4 und 6 (bei den Tennisplätzen) getauscht.
Gemäß Maps4BW (www.lgl-bw.de), immerhin eine "amtliche" Karte, war es vorher aber richtig.
Bist du dir absolut sicher mit der Änderung?
Grüße,
Akkurator
mmeusel (2020-08-31 16:05:17+00:00): Hallo Akkurator,
vor Ort ist definitiv das, von der Haslachstraße aus, vordere Haus mit der Nummer 6 gekennzeichnet. Bei dem hinteren Haus habe ich keine Nummer gefunden aber es handelt sich um das Vereinsheim des Boule Club Weingarten, die auf ihrer Website (http://www.boule-club-weingarten.de/impressum/) Haslachstraße 4 als ihrer Adresse angeben.
Grüße, mmeusel
JarkinPipa (2020-08-19 06:50:08+00:00): Revert needed. bicycle=use_sidepath should be used instead of bicycle=no.
Artasen (2020-08-18 18:52:13+00:00): What is happening here? The residential area is covering up the wood. ( See also Orchard head to the S). Wreaks End Farm to the NW is the way it used to be.
BeKri (2020-08-19 00:20:20+00:00): Echt jetzt ? surface=wood

Anspielung auf den "Holzweg"
der hier grad im Westen stattfindet ? ;-))
eimer42 (2020-08-19 16:13:35+00:00): Uups, sorry. Da habe ich wohl in StreetComplete auf den falschen Knopf gedrückt. Hab's gerade korrigiert.