piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
oneho (2020-11-18 14:28:49+00:00): tu si niesom istý či je vedenie mrtve alebo nie ale vychádzal som podla typu stĺpov ktorými sa na SK rozvádza elektrika medzi obcami s 22kV. Navyše pri kanáli je aj stĺp s transformátorom takže by to odpovedalo že sa tam mení z 22kV na 400V.
Snažil som sa zjednotiť el. vedenie na SK pretože vela ich je chybne zakreslených. Toto som upravoval popri kreslení nových 22kV vedení viď celé západné slovensko viď. modré čiary https://openinframap.org/#8.84/48.5179/17.7391
aceman444 (2020-11-19 18:55:33+00:00): To akoze hadate napatie podla typu stlpov? Ale nefunkcne vedenie vy vyzeralo presne rovnako, nevidite, ci tam tecie prud. Predpokladal, by som ze musite zadat len udaje overitelne na mieste, alebo podla spolahlivych a povolenych zdrojov.
AndresDuhour (2021-04-21 12:06:21+00:00): Buen día! Estoy trabajando en una revisión de conectividad y quería comentarle si la vía de servicio (highway=service) no tendría que ser residential, por ejemplo. Saludos! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
lferreyra (2021-04-21 12:49:12+00:00): Buenos días!
Me gustaría saber en detalle cual sería la vía residencial, o si tiene una imagen, para saber gráficamente cual es.
Debo reconocer que desconozco  los correctos criterios, pero apelamos todos los editores a la buena fe y criterio a la hora de hacer una modificación.
Yo considero como vía de servicio accesos a estacionamientos o corredores dentro o hacía de establecimientos en general (fábricas, reservas naturales, campings, areas de servicio) de tránsito público, si fuesen lugares de acceso exclusivo de propietarios o residentes, si correspondería como "vía privada o residencial", si considera que así fuera, aplique sin problemas los cambios necesarios, dicho con toda franqueza, ya que mis ediciones tienden a ser más extensivas (generación de areas no editadas), que de areas o lugares focalizadas o pequeñas.
Un saludo grande!
Luciano.
AndresDuhour (2021-04-28 15:31:02+00:00): Hola! Las vías a las que me refiero son las que conectan la ruta 1V09 con la calle Av. Brig. Juan Ignacio San Martín. Además corre entre los dos carriles de la ruta una vía etiquetada como highway=service. Quería comentarlo porque por ahí ha quedado sin revisar ese tramo y no lo cambiaron. Pero no hice el cambio porque no conozco el lugar y no quería hacer una edición sin conocer. También pensé que por su conocimiento local ese tipo de calle estuviera justificado. Espero que ubique el lugar y que sirva mi comentario.
Gracias! Andrés
lferreyra (2021-04-28 19:24:54+00:00): Andrés! Gracias por el comentario!
En estos momentos no tengo Internet y por lo tanto no estoy editando, pero apenas pueda tener un servicio, veo y te comento.
Si la vía de servicio esta entre los carriles que se abren a la entrada del Parque Industrial, entonces seguramente este mal, ya que al principio de mis ediciones, solía poner una vía indicando un carril para un giro lateral, en este caso el parque industrial, o una salida a una ruta perpendicular, que en la realidad es un carril de la misma calzada de la ruta, por lo tanto, quizás corresponda corregir.
Lo dejo a tu criterio, si es el correcto!
Saludos!
geri-oc (2020-09-27 07:43:22+00:00): Hier sind auch falsche Änderungen.
Wahrscheinlich etliche auch in anderen CS.
Wenn du änderst, dann bitte vor ORT und nicht automatisch.
Gruß Gerd
melcomsx (2020-09-28 15:55:51+00:00): Hallo,
Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung, ich werde jetzt mehr darauf mehr Acht geben dass sie richtig sind.
Gruß
Florian
BCNorwich (2020-09-29 07:46:45+00:00): Hi, 

In drawing the massive farmland area Way: 851901419 (which actually is not all farmland so is incorrect), you inadvertently self intersected and dragged a section of Way: Swaffham Road (539686138) out of alignment. Thus disrupting correct routing of the highway A1122. No problem now though, I spotted the mistake and have corrected it.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2022-09-07 10:15:29+00:00): Hoi Emvee

Kijk even naar naar deze changesets en naar de discussie op de changesets ... Wilhelminabrug.
De vraag is ... oneway=yes of oneway=no ?  That's the question. 

Startende mapper wilde de brug openstellen voor motorvoertuigen, maar er zijn hier restricties.
Ik heb wat teruggedraaid.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/LiliaAngelova/history#map=4/40.34/46.30

en

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7090361

MVG
eggie
emvee (2022-09-07 20:51:25+00:00): Dank voor de heads-up, ik zag de discussie op het forum voorbij komen.

Even gekeken naar de zuidelijke linkeroever toegangsweg maar op basis van de https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=50.851659210&lng=5.694610029&z=19.

oneway is duidelijk maar zie ik niet zo snel waar psv=yes en motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (Mo – Fri 11.00 - 18.00; Sa 11.00 - 17.00; Su 12.00 - 17.00) vandaan komt.
eggie (2022-09-07 21:00:32+00:00): Hoi emvee.. Dat laatste heb valselijk ontwaard op straatkijk bij de Eksterstraat.
In Obliek kun je ook wel borden zien zien..maar niet de tekst lezen.
Zou nog evt. In mapillary kunnen zoeken
kartler175 (2020-09-27 08:47:47+00:00): Please apply correct and complete member roles to boundary relations: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
(http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-123.04616&lat=49.25648&zoom=12&opacity=1.009
abakus_uploader (2020-09-26 22:36:04+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mbethke (2021-07-11 11:35:45+00:00): Hola,
porfa no lo pones el nombre genérico de "vivienda" o "terreno baldio" a los objetos (mucho menos en mayúsculas) - eso es que ya significa el tag "building=house" ou "landuse=greenfield". Algunas casas o terrenos sí tienen nombre - "Edificio Rosas", "Plaza 11 de Agosto", also así - pero "vivienda" no es un nombre.

saludos,
Matthias
Andrea Musuruane (2020-09-27 08:15:06+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non fare changeset con modifiche su aree così lontane tra di loro. Inoltre, il commento che hai messo non è significativo: senza guardare le modifiche non si capisce cosa hai fatto. La way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33202584 non è una living_street, le automobili non possono passarci. Era correttamente etichettata come footway, come si può vedere qui: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.829883300001555&lng=7.8228669000010465&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=w20pfqgdHPOeU8VJmq9IYM Tra l'altro living_street è una particolare tipologia di strada che in Italia non è esiste: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street. Quindi anche le modifiche alla way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667146034 sono sbagliate. "Farmacia di Gressoney-la-Trinité" non è un nome proprio. Tra l'altro secondo il sito della Regione, dovrebbe essere un dispensario stagionale, con orari differenti: http://www.ausl.vda.it/farmapage.asp?id=609&l=1&f=49. Infine highway=footway implica già che non ci possano passare determinati tipi di veicoli. Ciao, Andrea
Rainero (2020-09-27 20:35:55+00:00): Hallo Pascal Petzoldt,
die Adresse Hertzstraße 16, 76187 Karlsruhe zusätzlich zum Gelände in der Hertzstraße ans ganze Multipolygon des KIT zu mappen, halte ich für ungut. So gibt es nun 6 Gelände über KA verteilt mit dieser Adresse, davon nur eines in der Hertzstraße. Zum Navigieren ist die Adresse m.M.n. daher nicht mehr brauchbar.

Was meinen andere dazu? 

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Pascal Petzoldt (2020-09-27 20:38:53+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
Da hab ich wohl nicht aufgepasst, die Adresse sollte nur auf dem Gebiet der Westhochschule gemapped sein.
Danke für den Hinweis ich werde das morgen anpassen.

Gruß
Pascal
Pascal Petzoldt (2020-09-28 09:36:04+00:00): Habs jetzt korrigiert.
Gibts es jentz noch ungereimtheiten?

Gruß
Pascal
Rainero (2020-09-28 18:59:57+00:00): Hallo Pascal,

danke für die schnelle Reaktion und Korrektur!
Ich denke, das Entfernen der Adresse von der Relation löst das Problem, schaue aber zur Sicherheit morgen Abend noch mit osmsuspects drauf. Das Tool aktualisiert einmal täglich mit dem Datenstand vom Vorabend.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Rainero (2020-10-01 19:08:44+00:00): Auch die QS-Tools osmsuspects und osm-inspector haben nichts zu meckern. Die Ursache war also wirklich die Adresse an der Relation.
+1
twil4754 (2020-09-26 20:08:33+00:00): More updates to LHT – more details still to add, and signage in Rosedale Park parking lots is inconsistent. Mercer County must still be working on this.
wireguy (2020-09-27 10:35:40+00:00): Good update.   Need to add surface type for new section.
Glassman (2021-01-31 23:08:23+00:00): Just noticed that some of the fairways are on top of the greens. I'm not familiar with that course. could you review it and fix the overlaps
Saikat Maiti (2020-10-21 05:45:22+00:00): Hey Raj87, Please use street-level photo to update such details and feel free to capture photos :). lit=no (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=17.436483071287128&lng=78.36249501584155&z=17.433196919063935&pKey=DbgYcCppqRkIODr81-WvjQ&focus=photo&x=0.49144138474638516&y=0.5811264558940794&zoom=0) and maxspeed=100 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=17.437572917920544&lng=78.36300605539938&z=17&pKey=8wMs1SP9APMFb8eADm5XOQ&focus=photo) for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55821285/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378333807/history.
Happy Mapping!
blackboxlogic (2020-10-02 16:09:05+00:00): Some of the names you've added seem unlikely (for example, "2 wouldn’t fly. no shots."). Do you have a source for them?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91563334
blackboxlogic (2020-10-09 02:52:47+00:00): I'm considering deleting most of the items you've added because they don't seem like they belong on this map as they are. I wish you'd respond, and I might be able to help you fix them instead of removing them. -Alex
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91563334
eggie (2020-09-27 05:26:43+00:00): Welkom bij OSM

Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
Mvg
Eggie
GinaroZ (2021-01-19 13:02:42+00:00): Hi, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851920754 really a Lloyds Bank?
Glassman (2020-09-26 23:51:09+00:00): Tip: instead of deleting then adding features, just modify the original features. Doing so preserves the objects history. 

Tip: Adjust the imagery to match existing edits. Use the layer tool on the editors right and side. Every imagery seems to be off so adjusting it to fit will save time moving objects.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91564227
SomeoneElse (2020-12-28 19:18:01+00:00): Hello,
From looking at http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=486203841 , it looks like you've removed the "foot" tag from here.  Please don't do that - it means we'd no longer know whether there is a legal right of access here, or whether it's just a permissive path.
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/19862#ticket is the relevant JOSM ticket.
Best Regards,
Andy
BCNorwich (2020-09-27 09:35:49+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It seems there is an anomaly here, you've got Matcham Court and Candish Court drawn on top of the Quadrangle building.

Could you have a look and remedy please? If you need help please just ask in this comment section.

Regards Bernard.
Darren K (2020-10-06 10:25:26+00:00): So I might need help with this building. 

The building is know as the quadrangle but is actually 4 different buildings in one building.  With separate postcodes and entrances. Which is why it's a building over a building. 

Do you have a guide on hope to add this type of dwelling. 

Thanks in advance for your help.

Best

Darren
BCNorwich (2020-10-09 07:11:38+00:00): Hello Darren, I found the website with the floors of the building. One way to map this would be to draw the whole Quadrangle as the main building, tag such. Draw the four buildings as building:part=apartments, name=?, levels=?, please see:-https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part. Also if possible map the entrances to each building part.

Each building part can have the individual address tags, with numbers of the apartments if possible. Alternatively a method sometimes used is to map the entrances and place the address tags on the entrance node.

I don't know how easy this all is with the iD editor but it's fairly easy with the JOSM editor. If you need any help please just ask? I may have a go at it later on if you don't want to.

Regards Bernard
Ermindu (2020-09-26 21:51:22+00:00): Official : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhFVwtcLV9Q
eggie (2020-09-27 05:32:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Gebouwen worden eigenlijk geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) 
Een importverzoek kan via het forum van OSM.
Nu loopt het fietspad door het gebouw heen. Kijk nog even.
MVG,
Eggie
JannieA (2020-09-27 15:56:20+00:00): Dank je voor je reactie. Ik zal er nog even naar kijken (voor mijn wijziging liep het fietspad ook door het gebouw, maar het is een locatie die wordt aangepast).

Maar eigenlijk zeg je dat alle gebouwen in NL vanuit het kadaster worden geïmporteerd en dat mijn wijziging bij een volgende import weer ongedaan wordt gemaakt?
eggie (2020-09-27 16:27:39+00:00): Op het moment van import staan er waarschijnlijk twee gebouwen over elkaar heen. 
In de BAG is nog niets te zien.. dus import laat nog op zich wachten. Zodra het in de BAG staat kun je het ook  zelf laten importeren. 
Dat gaat via het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG,
Eggie
osmuser63783 (2024-10-15 23:46:22+00:00): Hi, I just stumbled across this changeset, out of curiosity, why would you remove sac_scale?
macgarvin (2024-10-16 06:18:22+00:00): This is from memory, as it was some years ago. I think I originally tagged the paths with a SAC classification when I put the paths in, and then decided that the SAC classification scale wasn't really appropriate for this specific area that wasn't mountainous, at least in the Swiss sense of the term. So, on the SAC scale, paths becoming less visible/less maintained is correlated with increasingly hostile terrain. But here paths become less visible depending on  less use, but they are no harder to walk on.
ma-rt-in (2020-10-02 06:31:27+00:00): Hallo,
du hast an Way 152832983 (Metro) das Minus in der Telefonnumer entfernt. Nur so als Anmerkung: Das kann man da ruhig stellen lassen, als Hinweise das die 0 eine Durchwahl darstellt.
vg
felipeeugenio (2020-09-27 22:55:48+00:00): Hola. Bienvenido a la comunidad.
la linea de interpolaciones sirve cuando entre dos direcciones hay otras que se intercalan, ya sea como números pares o impares.
Si mapea dos casas vecinas con los números de cada una, la interpolación intermedia no es necesaria.
saludos
gpserror (2020-10-03 15:24:07+00:00): Typically driveways are mapped, though calling it a service road may be a stretch.  It's better to have them marked as private than deleted.
gpserror (2020-10-03 15:31:02+00:00): Found your deletion. It looks like Amazon added it to get shipments their destinations better.  Again I would suggest a revert.
user_11886553 (2021-04-27 19:52:07+00:00): I would prefer it remain deleted.  Thanks.
tux67 (2020-09-27 09:30:29+00:00): Hallo Lachmöwe,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Hast du einen GPS Track beim Kanufahren aufgezeichnet? Auf den letzten PDOK Luftbildern sind solche Änderungen nicht zu sehen.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91565350
tux67 (2020-10-23 12:16:48+00:00): Hi, hast du noch eine Antwort auf meine Frage?

Gruß
tux67
Lachmöwe (2020-11-02 21:35:52+00:00): Hallo tux67,

gibt es für eine Begrüssung mit Hinweisen und Ratschlägen hier bei OSM keinen anderen Weg als über die Kommentarfunktion der technische Dokumentation, für die ich einen Changeset halte?

Dann wäre mir auch klar gewesen, dass da eine Frage ist auf der Du gerne eine Antwort gehabt hättest.

Zu Deiner Frage: Ja, ich habe einen Track aufgezeichnet. 
Und in JOSM lokal geladen und dann den Track für den Flußverlauf nachgezeichnet. Ein anderer Changeset enthält dann die Änderungen der Uferlinie. Diese muss, wenn Luftaufnahmen existieren noch angepaßt werden da das Ufer teilweise Teichartig ausgebuchtet angelegt wurde. Allerdings wird der Fluss ohne Uferlinie einfach nur als Strich dargestellt was falsch ist da die Niers breiter als 5m ist. 

Ich hoffe das beantwortet Deine Frage.

Mit freundlichem Gruß

Lachmöwe
tux67 (2020-11-03 06:31:20+00:00): Hi,
danke für die Antwort .. das macht die Quelle der Daten etwas transparenter. 
Was den Kontakt angeht ... die andere Option ist eine PM - beides bekommst du aber am Ende als eMail an deine bei OSM hinterlegte Adresse. 
Wenn ich zu einem CS eine Frage habe kombiniere ich das meist mit einer Begrüßung, wenn der Mapper neu ist.
Andere Mapper machen das bestimmt anders .. es gibt hier keine Vorgabe .. in den meisten Gegenden werden Neumapper wohl eher ignoriert.
Gruß
tux67
smootheFiets (2021-05-03 13:23:24+00:00): Hoi hole1988,
Ik zie dat je panden vanaf het BAG heeft ingetekend. Dat kan natuurlijk, maar waarschijnlijk is het makkelijker voor iedereen als je een import aanvraagt door het BAG-import team: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52973
Groetjes, smootheFiets
Miftah IRM-ED (2021-06-16 06:42:30+00:00): hi alejandroAlba,
Trust you are doing great!

I deleted this waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/851939682), based on Maxar Premium Imagery, Mapbox, Esri and Bing. 
Thank you, happy mapping :)
marczoutendijk (2020-09-27 09:32:41+00:00): Please observe the wiki for the proper use of the disused and abandoned keys. The cinema in your edits is wrongly tagged.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184415655#map=19/56.72670/21.99039
If something is abandoned, you cannot keep the original tag for that object. The cinema is abandoned or it is not abandoned, but it cannot have that two properties at the same time!
Also disused and abandoned do not go very well together, it is one or the other.
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
and also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:
marczoutendijk (2020-10-01 14:39:11+00:00): Is the cinema abandoned or not?
Innoventions (2020-11-04 20:09:33+00:00): Abandoned
marczoutendijk (2020-11-04 20:16:04+00:00): Then you should remove the amenity=cinema tagging as it is no longer a cinema.
Also disused=yes has no function here.
ruggs (2020-10-22 23:31:00+00:00): Hi DFFYou, I’m curious about a couple edits on this changeset.  You removed a secondary link (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/787014968) adjacent to Jalan Kledang Utara which ESRI World Imagery shows as missing.  However, OpenStreetCam imagery from June 2020 (https://openstreetcam.org/details/2350430/674/track-info) shows it currently exists.  I added it again.  Additionally, you added a lift gate with access=no to Jalan Merdeka (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300799865).  This is the second time this year you have added a barrier blocking access at this bridge.  OpenStreetCam from April 2020 (https://openstreetcam.org/details/2167334/230/track-info) and June 2020 (https://openstreetcam.org/details/2718514/526/track-info) show no barriers. Let me know what you think about these examples.
AkuAnakTimur (2020-10-23 03:37:22+00:00): Sorry for the interruption, but please proceed with your amendments. I'm not sure what was going on with this mapper, the last time there was problems coming from this same mapper as well.
Warin61 (2022-06-23 07:39:07+00:00): Hi
The DCS Base Map shows Brayton Rd as tertiary .. and that would not be 4DW only ? 
The road continues south of this section and looks to be in similar condition yet that is tagged as 100 kmh tertiary ...
cleary (2022-06-23 11:28:09+00:00): I have mapped it as I saw it. 

In about 2011 I intended to drive this road starting at Bannaby in a Holden Commodore but there was a 4WD only sign erected by Council and I did not proceed. A year later I drove it in a Prado 4WD and I had no doubt it needed the 4WD especially at the water crossing. I drove it again from the Marulan end in 2020 and the road seemed much worse than I remembered from 2012. I think it does not get maintenance and Council discourages traffic until they can get a bridge over the river (which will probably be long after I retire from driving). A couple of signs referred to the road as Swallow Tail Pass Track and I added this name as alt_name as it appears to be a local name but Brayton Road remains the official name. Unless it has changed in last 18 months, it is definitely not for the average car.  The NSW Base Map has its uses but it is sometimes badly wrong.
Warin61 (2022-06-23 23:16:43+00:00): Arr found a sign on the road that says '4WD recommended'... 

I have come across worse roads ...
Warin61 (2022-06-23 23:23:17+00:00): Possibly tracktype=grade6 with 4WD=recommended?
cleary (2022-06-23 23:27:54+00:00): I can only map according to what I see. I did it as accurately as I could. But I don't claim to be right all the time and I know road conditions can change at different times. You are an experienced contributor to OSM and I will accept any changes you might make.
Warin61 (2022-06-24 07:39:38+00:00): We all 'map what we see'. But there different levels of experience. One 4WD towing a caravan cumming off the savanna way told me "worst road in Australia" as I was entering. However I have been on that road before .. I've been on worse, 
The unfortunate bit is that renders are not showing the '4WD only'.  
The other problem is that there is now no difference between it and a forestry track .. 
I'm not certain what to do with it... reason way I contacted you to see if you had any bright ideas.. I'm inclined to change 4WD only to 4WD recomended in line with the sign. And only hte short section around the ford as a track - that is the worst section .. with the rest as 'unclassified'  but with the tracktype grade6 set.
cleary (2022-06-24 09:56:19+00:00): Warin, I have driven on a range of roads including many in outback NSW and Queensland and this section of Brayton Road is well below the usual standard of dirt/gravel roads. It was very badly rutted in parts with inadequate drainage, deep ridges and holes - one would certainly want a car with good clearance between the vehicle and the roadway and, preferably, the ability to manoeuvre the vehicle and gain traction if one could not keep all four wheels onto the roadway simultaneously.  The local use of the name "Swallow Tail Pass Track" probably reflects local perspective that it is a track rather than a road (as those terms are commonly used).

I did my best with it but I also trust you. So please do as you think best. And thanks for asking prior to making any changes.
Andre68 (2020-09-27 06:25:19+00:00): Please do not apply place=islet to unclosed ways. The tag is in the relation.