piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fazlerabbi37 (2019-08-15 13:06:27+00:00): Thank you very much for pointing out the issue. I would like to rise two points here:

1. If you see the changeset details you would be able to see that I added the name and the wheelchair access tags via an app named StreetComplete which suggested the name and asked if it has wheelchair access so to which I responded accordingly. So for the name there was no way to specify `name` and `name:en` tag.

2. I am not sure if you are aware of the problem or not but text having Unicode character shows problem rendering in the OSM ecosystem and sometime makes the system unusable for the user. In OSM community, the OSM site; where we are talking, is regarded more as an open data source than tradition map utility for daily use. This site shows the Unicode texts perfectly but the wide range of application that people use as their daily driver takes that data from here and faces problem rendering it and the user end up with an unusable system. The link you provided does say that we should follow the convention you proposed but from the edit history it would seem that 'convention' was introduced to the OSM Wiki fairly recently and I suspect it was introduced without considering the use case I mentioned above. Each community fixes its own standard discussing with their fellow community mapper (see example of [India](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages)) and to may knowledge I didn't see any discussion about this 'convention' that breaks the usability of user.
aceman444 (2021-04-18 01:00:08+00:00): Hi, what is the source of the name Schody pri Starej Vodárni? You do not provide any usable source for your changes. Bing imagery, that you used are outdated and must not be used for changes in Slovakia. Please use a newer source like Ortofotomozaika SR or Maxar imagery. Thanks
kesy (2021-04-18 12:24:50+00:00): Hi,
this seems to be a commonly used name, however I now see the cadastral map doesn't officially recognize it. I can check it again in person, this area is undergoing a massive redevelopment anyway.
4004 (2019-08-10 23:31:21+00:00): здрасьте, а на долго? чтоб не забыть потом назад открыть
Hungerburg (2019-08-11 08:17:25+00:00): Hallo Buddi, so wie auf dem Luftbild wird es dort nicht wieder, am Rain.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:37:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
BCNorwich (2019-08-10 12:49:09+00:00): Removed a duplicate section of primary highway you added. Please be careful how you map as mistakes can corrupt routing.
user_5359 (2019-08-09 12:56:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useless information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
emergency99 (2019-08-09 08:50:24+00:00): Hello, why did you delete the bus stop node for Kappgasse?
andi9876 (2019-08-15 13:37:16+00:00): Dear, please stop add pharmacys, remember, it´s visible for everybody.
adivik2000 (2019-08-16 20:26:48+00:00): Any reason why donabanda -keesara road classification changed? It's a state highway maintained by AP.
Dimacn (2019-08-11 18:39:00+00:00): Что это такое?
Bonbadil (2019-10-02 15:56:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Êtes-vous sûr qu'il s'agit d'un refuge ouvert au public ?
De mémoire, il s'agissait d'un bâtiment privé avec un panneau en interdisant explicitement l'accès.
Lokai (2020-04-27 10:42:36+00:00): Hallo Spintor123,
deine anbetungswürdigen Rebsorten habe ich heute im Gelände gesucht. Der 
Tag place_of_worship ist nicht dafür gedacht Rebsorten oder Rebenlagen gem. Flurnamen zu benennen. Der Tag bescheibt u.a. Bildstöcke und rel. Grotten.

Die nicht gefundenen pow habe ich gelöscht.

Für deine Zwecke wird https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/ passen.

MfG

W.
literan (2019-08-09 11:58:01+00:00): Добрый день. Правильно делать пробел в номере здания (например '71 к2')
Frans S (2019-08-09 12:50:36+00:00): Hello Antagu.  You have noticed that I checked all your mappings. Do not take this as a personal issue to you. The used imagery is every time the Bing imagery. The instructions says to use the Maxar imagery so I had to review all your tasks you marked as complete mapped. The Bing imagery is rather old <2015 
Maxar is more recent and shows more buildings since the Bing imagery was used.
Best regards and keep mapping
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-10-31 00:15:25+00:00): Hallo Sleipnir87, Ja der Radweg wurde geändert, das heißt aber nicht, den alten Weg zu löschen, sondern den alten Weg aus der Relation entfernen. Jetzt fehlt der Fußweg vom Augartensteg Richtung Süden bis zum Augartenbad. Die Relationen hab ich repariert. Schaffst du es, den fehlenden Fußweg wieder hinzuzufügen?
LG Robert
PT-53 (2019-08-11 05:09:20+00:00): Hallo Akkurator,
weiterer keep right-Hinweis:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=113304772
Grüße
Akkurator (2019-08-11 15:28:20+00:00): Mal ne Frage: Wo ist eigentlich das Problem, wenn angrenzende Polygone jeweils einen eigenen Punkt auf den (fast) gleichen Koordinaten haben?
Tut der Nutzbarkeit der Daten keinen Abbruch und vereinfacht manchmal sogar sogar das Editieren, weil man das Zeugs nicht erst entkleben muss. Außerdem ist es im Editor nicht einmal sichtbar, ob da nun 2 oder 3 oder 4 Punkte aufeinander sind. In der Karte auch nicht.
Also wenn's dich stört, darfst du solchen "Kinkerleskram" meinetwegen gerne in Zukunft ungefragt einfach selbst korrigieren, das verursacht auch weniger Aufwand.

Verfolgenswerter fände ich da solche Hinweise ganz in der Nähe:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=101175215
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=101175309

Grüße,
Akkurator
PT-53 (2019-08-14 06:35:50+00:00): Eine solche Antwort hätte ich gerade von dir nicht erwartet.
Schade
rene78 (2019-08-11 21:59:19+00:00): Hi, what is the purpose of those tags?

CREASRC --> OMM-DRD-CDD Paung TS mapping session
EDITCOM20190808 --> TZ
Sowa1980 (2019-08-22 17:24:53+00:00): Недопустимый источник данный, буду настаивать на откате эти данных, и если это не прекратиться на блокировке Вас.
gendy54 (2019-08-12 14:24:41+00:00): Pour la résidence services, il manque les tag principaux. Le nom seul ne suffit pas.
Je te laisse regarder https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:social_facility%3Dassisted_living

Je pense que ca correspond à l'objet en question. Sinon y a ca pour plus de généralités: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:social_facility#Personnes_.C3.A2g.C3.A9es

je te laisse les rajouter.
mavl (2019-11-16 18:00:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
Luzandro (2019-10-01 16:34:17+00:00): Changeset rückgängig gemacht, siehe: http://osm-talk-at.1116557.n5.nabble.com/Talk-at-zahlreiche-motorway-link-auf-motorway-geandert-td3144.html
Prof SNT LVV (2019-08-09 09:55:13+00:00): Cette contribution semble valide
literan (2019-08-09 11:49:20+00:00): там не макс. вес, а макс. грузоподъемность. Поэтому исправил на правильный тег hgv:conditional=private @ (06:00-22:00 AND maxload>3)
mbethke (2019-08-23 08:09:51+00:00): Are you sure about the Curry Leaf Hostel? The name tag, website etc. still refer to Pedlar's Inn, and PI's website seems to say it's still at that place.
Natalie Ogden (2019-08-23 13:41:19+00:00): Yes, the owner of Pedlars Inn sold the business and the new owner took it over, calling the hostel Curry leaf. He is in the transition of changing the name. Pedlars Inn no longer exists.
mbethke (2019-08-26 07:52:10+00:00): Thanks! I removed the old name and leftover website tag.
eggie (2019-08-09 10:58:03+00:00): Nu is het oke zie ik.. 
Wanneer je overzicht wilt houden schakel over naar JOSM. 
motorcar=no hoeft niet, maar kwaad kan het niet.
eggie (2019-08-09 10:46:50+00:00): Oke.. Nu is het een school.. 
area = yes kan er weer af. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-08-09 11:05:54+00:00): De parking is al aangegeven als node. Nu heb je een vlak amenity=parking toegevoegd. dat is dubbel. Een van de twee dus weghalen.

area yes weghalen.
rainerU (2019-08-12 02:51:20+00:00): Hello,

giving a name to a water point is not a good idea. 'name' in OSM is the individual name of an object by which it is distinguished from other  objects of the same kind. Th fact that an object is a little flow of water should be put into an amenity=* or a water=* attribute.

I reverted your change
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73186997
eggie (2019-08-09 10:48:58+00:00): Oke.. top!  area yes kan er af.. ook van de leisure=pitch
area =ye gebruiken we bv om van een vlak highway=pedestrian het hele vlak als een voetgangersgebied te laten renderen ipv van een smalle weg. .
user_10210920 (2019-08-09 10:54:41+00:00): Thanks!
StephaneP (2019-08-14 18:30:44+00:00): Salut !
Dans ce changeset, tu as déplacé des noeuds de jonction entre la voie principale et les bretelles. Comme celui-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/274420390
Il ne fallait pas, car il y a moins d'une semaine j'ai terminé d'ajouter tous les lanes, turn_lanes, destination:lanes, maxspeed:lanes, etc... sur l'ensemble de cette 4 voies. Avec cette modélisation des voies de sortie et d'insertion, la jonction avec la bretelle se fait à sa limite. Je corrige.
StephaneP (2019-08-14 18:35:52+00:00): Ensuite, ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685572420 pour moi c'était correct en tant que haie, car ça n'a rien d'une forêt ou d'un bois. On pourrait éventuellement ajouter un way avec natural=tree_row au milieu de la haie. Je m'en occupe.
StephaneP (2019-08-14 18:41:27+00:00): A+
ndm (2019-08-09 19:08:05+00:00): I've tried to adjust this so landuses don't overlap -- does "Kings Weston Ln" have a better name?
Jordi MF (2019-09-03 19:28:15+00:00): Hola,
Gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM en la Vall. He estado corrigiendo algunos errores de mapeado ya que se han añadido excesivos parque que no lo eran. Por favor, consulta la Wiki sobre qué se entiende como parque (leisure=park) en OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en
leisure=park se utiliza en parque semisalvajes, de gran extensión donde se pueden realizar diversas actividades de ocio.
Para cualquier duda, puedes consultar la comunidad española de OSM en la lista de correo talk-es y en Telegram. Muchas gracias y te animamos a seguir mejorando el mapa de la Vall d'Uixó.
Saludos,
Jordi
eggie (2019-08-09 11:23:08+00:00): Dag hvthiene.. Bij een track kun je de tracktype weergeven. Dat bepaalt dan ook de routering.
tracktype=grade1  is verhard en tracktype=grade5 is nauwelijks te ontwaren.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype

Succes,
Eggie
hvthiene (2019-08-09 18:33:28+00:00): Dankjewel voor de tip!
canfe (2019-10-25 11:05:53+00:00): Perché hai tolto il riverbank al Malone?
BCNorwich (2019-08-09 12:57:54+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The correct addr:city would be Cambridge not Northstowe, even though lots of addresses around here are wrongly addressed.
Northstowe would be the hamlet or suburb name.

Regards Bernard.
ndm (2019-08-09 19:03:16+00:00): I'm going to revert most of this -- you've moved separate buildings on top of each other -- and put a whole landuse layer on top of an existing one.

If you insist on use a beta imagery layer you need to adjust it to match existing content -- not just move stuff randomly.
Hjart (2019-08-09 11:14:01+00:00): Jeg tilføjede bygningen for få dage siden og har nu kaldt den tilbage og markeret den som nedrevet (generelt en god ide så længe bygninger er at se på aktuelle luftfotos)
Peter Jensen (2019-08-09 20:00:54+00:00): Ja, det er jo ikke særlig produktivt, hvis vi skiftes til at oprette og slette ;) Beklager fejlen. Da jeg opdagede bygningen var bragt tilbage ledte jeg efter key:demolished, men kunne ikke finde den - så var delete-knappen nærmest.
Hjart (2019-08-10 15:02:12+00:00): Præcist ;-) Jeg (og mange andre) plejer at tilføje et præfix, som beskrevet i https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished: . Det er dog noget man lige skal have en vis erfaring for at være opmærksom på. I iD kan man tilføje det nede i "Alle tags" felterne.
eggie (2019-08-09 11:09:23+00:00): prima
n2m (2019-08-13 14:43:48+00:00): Blerta, please make your edits more compact in area and scope, so that it's easier to see what's been done and to also limit yourself to errors. I deleted one duplication and reverted one deleted way in this changeset.

Also, where and when possible, it's better not to delete entire ways but rather use realignment tools.

Cheers.
Jordi MF (2019-08-12 19:41:19+00:00): Hola de nuevo Dliplus,

¿El "Parque urbano" se llama así oficialment? Recuerda que la etiqueta "name=*" se utiliza para nombrar aquellos elementos de la realidad que tienen un nombre situado en dicho elemento (una placa de calle, un letrero, etc.). En caso de que sea un nombre utilizado solamente por algunos vecinos, es conveniente añadirlo en otra etiqueta (alt_name o loc_name).

¿Este parque está construido por el ayuntamiento o es un descampado utilizado de manera recreativa por las personas?

Saludos,
Jordi
ma-rt-in (2019-08-09 11:15:26+00:00): Hallo,

bitte nicht since für das Start-Datum verweden, dafür haben wir start_date.

vg
Sosha1996 (2019-09-24 09:13:55+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «پارک» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-09-24 09:13:52+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «پارک» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mzioma (2019-10-12 11:48:35+00:00): "tymczasowo bez wody" nie jest nazwą własną tylko opisem.
ndm (2019-08-09 18:51:24+00:00): Why are you adding oneway=yes -- there are no oneway markings -- please check Bing Streetside.
kmarjbh (2019-08-20 11:47:05+00:00): Hi ndm,
 
Thanks for looking into my edit. I have given the tag of oneway=yes based upon the mapillary street imagery with latest date where clearly we can see 1 way lane marking and 1 way street board. Let me know in case you have any concerns. I will be happy to learn from the community.
 
Regards,
kmarjbh
ndm (2019-08-25 09:13:26+00:00): Your oneway was correct when I surveyed it -- I also removed the oneway:bicycle=no near Royal Fort Road that you had left.
kmarjbh (2019-08-26 12:00:11+00:00): Hi ndm,

Thank you for the update. Let me know in case you have any further suggestions. Would be happy to help.

Regards,
kmarjbh
riiga (2019-08-09 12:05:09+00:00): loc_name eller alt_name är nog bättre, för Gyllentorget är inte ett äldre namn utan båda används och Gyllentorget torde vara nyare än Lilla torget som namn.
riiga (2019-08-09 20:42:19+00:00): Tog mig friheten att fixa det nu.
mueschel (2019-08-10 10:06:20+00:00): Hi,
you added about 80 objects with a strange tag that doesn't look like it should be in the OSM database:
laramap_layer

Could you check and fix this?
And: I saw that you added most POIs twice, once as an area and once as a node. Please remove one of them - every actual object (like a pitch) should only appear once in OSM.
mueschel (2019-08-10 12:54:55+00:00): [Response to a private message detailing a organized mapping effort and tagging for one special application of theirs]

Please read
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Using a tag just to control display in your application / website is not covered by "custom tags". Tags that are specific for one map application are not welcomed and should be kept in a separate database.
RCD49 (2019-08-10 13:04:15+00:00): I will start to search for an alternative solution but *kindly request that you please do not remove these tags now*. I will certainly delete them once I have a developed an alternative method to deal with the issue.
Thank you.
RCD49 (2019-08-10 16:27:29+00:00): Tags removed. (Workaround developed independently from OSM.)
Best regards
ndm (2019-08-09 18:51:05+00:00): Why are you adding oneway=yes -- there are no oneway markings -- please check Bing Streetside.
kmarjbh (2019-08-20 11:50:46+00:00): Hi ndm,
 
Thanks for looking into this edit. I had made this edit based upon the bing aerial imagery, where I could see a do not enter board. In case you have any local knowledge, please let me know, I will revert the edit. Let me know in case you have any further suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community.
 
Regards,
kmarjbh
ndm (2019-08-25 09:16:54+00:00): You are correct that there is a no-entry sign on St Augustine's Parade forbidding entry -- this was already implemented as  a very small section of oneway=yes.

However, there are no oneway signs on Denmark Street itself -- it is (theoretically) possible to turn and drive back in the opposite directtion on the section you marked as oneway.
alphensebezorger (2019-08-09 14:01:28+00:00): Hallo fietswim,

Zo te zien heb je in deze changeset de netwerkrelatie van het wandelnetwerk Breda verwijderd. Was dat wel de bedoeling, of is dat per ongeluk gebeurd?

Vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.
dvdhoven (2019-08-09 15:25:38+00:00): Op verzoek van fietswim is deze changeset reverted. Kostte nog flink moeite gemopper over een relatie, die een andere relatie wilde hebben. Uiteindelijk 31-33 uit Breda verwijderd, gesaved, toen lukte het wel en 31-33 opnieuw lid gemaakt van Breda

Vr Gr
Dick van den Hoven
alphensebezorger (2019-08-09 15:25:47+00:00): Ik zie dat de verwijdering inmiddels is teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73198475 door dvdhoven.
kapazao (2019-08-09 13:10:31+00:00): Hola, ¿por qué has realizado estos cambios? estaba bien anteriormente. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:C%C3%B3mo_mapear_un#Plaza_de_toros
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73190242
Tomas Straupis (2019-08-09 17:23:23+00:00): Šitas takas rimtai uždarytas, kad access=no?
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
ToniE (2019-08-09 12:25:17+00:00): Servus Rainer,

könntest Du bitte folgendes in die Quelle/Source (2. Zeile beim Upload-Dialog" aufnehmen? Das ist das, was der MVV sich wünscht.

"Münchner Verkehrs- und Tarifverbund GmbH (MVV); GTFS vom 26.03.2019"

Vielen Dank und bis Mittwoch beim Stammtisch
Toni
Rainero (2019-08-09 20:27:33+00:00): Klar, mache ich. Beim nächsten CS steht's schon so drin.

Bis Mittwoch,
Rainer
Janjko (2021-04-15 11:50:00+00:00): Zar nije Židovska škola Hugo Kon na Katarininom trgu? I na njihovom webu piše da su tamo, i ništa ne piše o ovoj lokaciji. Možda je ovo neka dislocirana jedinica?
simulator1 (2021-04-15 11:59:39+00:00): Ne sjećam se točno. Moguće da je ostala ploča neka ako su tu prije bili.
Tomas Straupis (2019-08-10 05:29:03+00:00): Objektus braižyti reikėtų pagal Lietuvoje ruoštą ortofoto - tik ji yra tiksli. Daugiau info čia: https://blog.openmap.lt/2013/06/05/ortofoto/

Sėkmės
Drevenukas (2019-08-13 05:34:05+00:00): Supratau, ateityje taip ir darysiu. Tiesiog ieškojau ryškesnio vaizdo.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-27 04:32:14+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4005012 ?
mosstreet (2019-08-10 16:26:25+00:00): Перестаньте править так, все кривое косое да еще и не в размер. Или делайте правильно или все удалю.
gendy54 (2019-08-12 14:13:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de cette contribution.
En revanche, vous avez fait une erreur en utilisant le tag destinés aux hôpitaux pour cartographier un médecin généraliste.
Un médecin se marque healthcare=doctors et/ou amenity=doctors.
Le wiki est là pour vous aider à ne pas faire d'erreurs: wiki.openstreetmap.org

Bon courage.
theophrastos (2019-08-10 06:11:28+00:00): Hallo firefoxinspace,
wäre es nicht sinnvoll, die B 505 einheitlich zu klassifizieren. Der kurze primary-Abschnitt südlich der AS BA-Süd, wie auch der Abschnitt von Hirschaid bis zur A3 unterscheiden sich bezüglich Ausbaugrad und Verkehrsbedeutung nicht von den trunk-Abschnitten.
MfG
firefoxinspace (2019-08-11 11:20:46+00:00): Servus, der Unterschied ist, dass im als Trunk klassifizierten Abschnitt die Fahrtrichtungen getrennt sind, während bei Primare ein Überholen im Gegenverkehr möglich ist. LG