piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
unsungNovelty (2016-04-15 09:12:42+00:00): Hi jpmartin,

I don't think these are villages. All of these looks like neighbourhoods. Can you please share the source used to make these changes?
jpmartin1977 (2016-04-15 12:55:01+00:00): I will go change them to neighbourhoods. I have been a bit confused on which is which. Give me a few days. I'm not working where I usually am so I do not have as much time as usual
unsungNovelty (2016-04-18 04:26:21+00:00): That is great jpmartin. Lemme know if you need any help from me.

- Nikhil
jpmartin1977 (2016-04-18 12:02:45+00:00): Thank you sir! I'll start working on them today. I will send you a message if I need some help.
Ogmios (2016-04-06 19:26:38+00:00): 👍🏿
waldhans (2016-04-01 21:49:00+00:00): was hältst du von craft=luthier?
Wird zwar nur 9x verwendet, darunter 1x von mir (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3021940032), aber ist genau der Geigenbauer.

mfg Kurt
wicked4sick (2016-04-02 17:12:53+00:00): ja, das ist gut. Ich hatte einfach den nächstbesten Vorschlag genommen. Ganz sauber fand ich es auch nicht.
Evtl. in Verbindung mit dem shop=musical_instrument, falls nicht nur Reparaturen ausgeführt werden?
Kennst du weitere Geigenbauer (z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1567316519) in anderen Großstätten, wo man nachsehen kann, wie die getaggt wurden?
waldhans (2016-04-02 19:13:24+00:00): Ich habe nur den einen gefunden, ist allerdings auch nicht meine Spezialität. OverpassTurbo findet in Europa ungefähr  9 Einträge, in Deutschland immer zusammen mit shop=. Also ruhig taggen, dann verbreitet sich das schon.

Schöne Grüße, Kurt
wicked4sick (2016-04-03 11:55:47+00:00): Alles klar, ich habe die vier mit craft=luthier getaggt. Gruß, Bernhard
AgusQui (2016-04-07 01:23:20+00:00): ah, ya estaba por avisar a la ONU
Javierpf (2016-04-13 12:42:46+00:00): jajaja, evitamos la 3ra guerra mundial
woodpeck (2016-04-02 14:12:44+00:00): This changeset didn't "change" addr:country, it *added* addr:country to a number of ways and nodes. What data (or logic) did you use to derive the country a building was in, and why did you do it exactly for these objects and not others? Large-scale mechanical edits are generally frowned upon and I'd suggest to refrain from making them in the future.
EcuadorFreedom (2016-04-01 16:40:18+00:00): why was this deleted?  this is an alternate route in case and used by those seeking to avoid pavement...
5m4u9 (2016-04-02 06:54:59+00:00): Gracias por añadir y mejorar el mapa.

Si requieren añadir el mapa en su página web sólo deben usar la opción de compatrir (derecha en el mapa) y obtener el código para añadir.
Paul_012 (2016-09-11 20:04:59+00:00): Reverted by changeset 42049445 because the edit introduced layer conflicts.
karitotp (2016-09-15 20:51:39+00:00): Hey there!
Thank you for having fixed the conflict since you contribute to improving the map.
Deanna Earley (2016-04-01 15:04:26+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetmap!

It looks like you accidentally removed the rest of the building though.
I have corrected this for you, and used the correct tags for a beauty parlour.
Would you be able to add the rest of the contact details?

Thanks
King Euro (2018-10-25 09:00:19+00:00): Das hängt von der Jahreszeit ab. Im Sommer ist (abgesehen von einer kleinen Schneise) der komplette Bereich von Seerosen bedeckt. Entsprechende Naturschutzgebiets-Schilder stehen auch dort um diesen Bereich auszuweisen.
glibbertorsten (2018-10-25 09:05:40+00:00): Ein Feuchtgebiet, ein Naturschutzgebiet und im Sommer mal Seerosen sind doch völlig verschiedene Dinge...?! Das Naturschutzgebiet soll natürlich ausgewiesen sein wenn vorhanden (mir erscheinen die Ausmaße grob nach Foto geschätzt, aber es gibt sehr genaue Grenzangaben für so etwas)
Ein Feuchtgebiet muss genauer spezifiziert sein und für Seerosen gibt es meines Wissens noch keinen Tag.
King Euro (2018-10-25 11:43:01+00:00): Okay. Bin mir inzwischen auch nicht mehr ganz so sicher ab wann ein Naturschutzgebiet bei OSM eingetragen wird.
Ja, es sind diese Eulen-Kennzeichnungen vor Ort, aber auf Seiten wie protectedplanet.net oder geodienste.bfn.de/schutzgebiete wird so ein "Kleinkram" nicht erwähnt.

Aber ich gebe dir Recht, ein richtiges Feuchtgebiet ist das dort (aber auch östlich der Planitz (52.3908, 13.05358)) nicht, da dort immer Wasser ist.
bkil (2018-10-08 18:42:19+00:00): Hello, I see that you are using the free_refill=* key. Would you be interested in discussing a potentially improved tag for the same concept either on the mailing list or on the talk page of the wiki?
Thread starter:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-September/039520.html
Answers:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-October/039562.html
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refilling_a_purchased_drink
MKnight (2016-05-29 12:13:05+00:00): Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406984319 ist ein Weg doppelt.

Die Upload-Warnung in Josm "Überlappende Straßen" die bedeutet übrigens, dass sich an der Stelle Straßen überlappen...
MKnight (2016-05-29 12:13:48+00:00): Siehe auch: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.17996&lat=48.72150&zoom=18&overlays=duplicate_ways
alo8 (2016-05-29 12:39:11+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis + Tipp OSM Inspector. Weg korrigiert. Jetzt nicht mehr überlappend.
Gruß, alo8
下り専門 (2016-04-02 02:29:54+00:00): 「住所検索」とはFacebookの検索でしょうか？
だとしたらOpenStreetMapの住所データはFacebookは使っていないようなので、がんばっても効果はない気がします。
OpenStreetMap純正のNominatimでの検索のことでしたら、まだ日本の住所への対応が不十分でソフトウェアの改良が必要です。
日本の住所体系が世界的に見て特殊なことが背景にあります。
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Nominatim

Haapy Mapping!
adrianojbr (2016-04-01 21:00:20+00:00): dclarks, a classificação do place depende da população. vou reverter essa edição. veja mais em: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:place

abraço.
dclarks (2016-04-01 22:18:33+00:00): ah blz, só acho estranho não constar no mapa o nome do município dependendo do zoom, aparece os bairros mas não o nome do município. 

Como você fez pra detectar tão rápido que eu alterei isso?
adrianojbr (2016-04-02 19:50:01+00:00): concordo contigo. também me incomoda não aparecer o nome da cidade, mas somente o dos bairros. por outro lado, não devemos mapear para o renderizador. então isso é um problema do mapnik (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapnik), tanto que o osmand, p. ex., em determinado zoom, mostra o nome da cidade.

sobre "vigiar" áreas, há esse tópico no fórum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53079

abraço.
dclarks (2016-04-03 15:32:10+00:00): Pois é, não pensei sobre o mapnik, realmente é renderização dele! É bem ruim o fato de o nome da cidade não aparecer, fica difícil fazer a localização. Pesquisei sobre essa cidade porque abriu concurso público há pouco, queria saber um pouco mais sobre ela.
Obrigado pelo retorno, interessante essa de "vigiar" e ver o que está rolando na região.
Abraço
adrianojbr (2016-04-03 20:09:07+00:00): opa, dclarks. eu sou natural de campo belo do sul. volta e meia passo lá. se precisar alguma informações sobre a cidade, me envia email: adrianojbr@gmail.com. abraço.
dclarks (2016-04-04 13:30:34+00:00): olá adrianojbr, muito bacana sua atitude, vou deixar anotado aqui, qualquer coisa eu entro em contato!! Obrigado
Abraço!
Borut@OSM (2016-04-02 00:35:36+00:00): Also IMHO more cleanups needed. But it looks much better now, as far as I can tell - thanks! I have no much spare time, unfortunately. Liebe Grüße, Borut
BCNorwich (2016-04-05 19:21:01+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtower
The tower will no show as you have tagged it. Correct tags are :-
man_made=tower
tower:type=communication

Please remove the tags :- 
man_made_1 
man_made_2
They serve no purpose.
RicoElectrico (2017-05-28 18:33:17+00:00): Hej, miałeś chyba jakieś lepsze źródła niż ortofoto Geoportalu / DigitalGlobe - ktoś zgłosił że powinna tu być droga: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1010927
Paul_012 (2016-09-11 20:08:25+00:00): Reverted by changeset 42049445 because the edit introduced layer conflicts and was inaccurate.
Jose Riha (2016-04-03 22:10:32+00:00): takto sa cisla neznacia: http://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov

opat upozornujem na porusovanie copyrightu!
carina alejandra (2016-04-01 19:33:38+00:00): Hola ,me llamo Carina Alejandra Zilli y  aquì les estoy indicando  el plano del Districto Nelson ,lugar donde resido.
carina alejandra (2016-04-01 19:34:01+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38232656#map=14/-31.2643/-60.7523
user_5359 (2016-04-03 15:34:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the syntax of opening_hours: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
emergency99 (2016-04-01 20:46:18+00:00): Hello,
please keep to the p_t v:2 mapping scheme, mind the Bus relations (the platforms and stop positions should be in order in the relation of the bus line) and every busline should have a relstion per direction (that is for the lines 351 and 447). I will fix the bus lines that habe the station samptwandnergasse in their relations. 


Please do not map buslines with iD, but use JOSM instead. There you can edit the relations correctly. 
Thanks
Jose Riha (2016-04-03 20:18:49+00:00): ahoj marian,

pouzivanim Here maps porusujes licenciu. prosim precitaj si http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright a odstran vsetky svoje zavadne edity! dakujem, jose
kayle (2017-04-11 11:29:38+00:00): Je to staršia úprava, ale rád by som sa opýtal či je na dome naozaj 6 podlaží a nie 7, ako bolo pôvodne zaznačené. 
Číslo nevyjadruje poschodia ale podlažia, viď. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:building:levels 
A zdá sa že ich je viac ako 6 (snáď aj 8, ťažko povedať)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.69957989999887&lng=18.914719471947137&z=17&pKey=0oVqZ2Ri6GWbT_iL1xtUDw&focus=photo
MarcoR (2016-04-02 08:30:13+00:00): Ciao!

Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap. 

Le modifiche che hai apportato verranno cancellate perché non riguardano "oggetti" realmente esistenti.

Buon proseguimento,

Marco.
enrico95 (2016-04-02 14:39:11+00:00): guardi che io lo faccio di fantasia, che è la mia creatività, scusi!!!
MarcoR (2016-04-02 16:44:32+00:00): Perché non usare la tua creatività in modo costruttivo disegnando oggetti *veri*? In questo modo faresti qualcosa di utile per te e per gli altri utenti.

OpenStreetMap non è una lavagna ma un progetto utilizzato da tante persone ogni giorno perché rispecchia la realtà.

Hai dimostrato di avere capacità più che sufficienti per iniziare a mappare seriamente. Nella tua zona sicuramente ci saranno bar, sportelli bancomat e farmacie che ancora non sono presenti su OpenStreetMap... che aspetti?

Se vuoi continuare a disegnare di fantasia ti consiglio di rivolgerti ad un altro servizio (come per esempio http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/ ), altrimenti rischi che prima o poi i tuoi lavori vengano cancellati (non solo da me).

Grazie dell'attenzione e buon proseguimento,

Marco.
Alecs01 (2016-04-02 18:11:41+00:00): Caro Enrico, se ti interessa disegnare delle mappe di fantasia, puoi iscriverti qui: http://opengeofiction.net per il resto come ti ha già scritto Marco, OpenStreetMap raccoglie dati reali, e sei naturalmente il benvenuto se vuoi contribuire a migliorare la mappatura dei posti che conosci. Un saluto. Alessandro
ACarlotti (2020-04-25 07:30:49+00:00): Did you look at the surrounding map data before making this change? I'm pretty sure this is basically a flat toll plaza with no bridges; it looks like the original mapper decided to link all border post exits with all toll booths (on this side). While the original mapping is incorrect, your edit here just makes it worse.

This change looks like a mechanical edit (in that you are changing lots of things systematically without necessarily properly reviewing each change). There is now a page on the wiki about these (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits). Unfortunately I can't easily check whether you've made other errors like this, or whether this was just a rare mistake.
d1g (2016-04-14 07:34:27+00:00): Спасибо! Ссылки на сайт и контактные телефоны тоже можно указывать - условие только что они актуальные.

Отмеченные окрестности выглядят неплохо, не стесняйтесь обновлять ближайшую информацию для туристов.

Если долго делать правки, то информацию в заметках учтут другие пользователи.
SK53 (2016-04-04 19:20:43+00:00): Hi Alex,

Enjoying watching how the area is coming on. Just think that the Donkey Hill name on St Bartholomew's Road should be in a different tag from ref. I suspect that either local_name or alt_name is better. It wont show on the rendering, but will be picked up by the search box.

All the best,

Jerry
alexkemp (2016-04-04 19:29:12+00:00): 'local-' or 'alt-' may make better sense, but the fact that "Donkey Hill" shows up on the map is so thrilling (endorsing the local legend & naming) that I would wish it to stay in 'ref'.
alexkemp (2016-04-04 19:35:40+00:00): PS
Bottom of Donkey Hill is a mess (junction St Anns Well Road) - bad info from commercial operators. Will be fixing it immediately I finish entering Thorneywood Rise + Gordon Road info, having collected fresh info today.
SK53 (2016-04-04 19:38:35+00:00): I did wonder about that; it will go eventually when someone cleans up all refs, but content to leave it for now. At least add it as loc_name too. Perhaps we could work on a rendering with only local names, but they're still a bit thin on the ground http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fsr
SK53 (2016-04-04 19:39:41+00:00): Local knowledge wins every time!
alexkemp (2016-04-04 23:18:24+00:00): PPS
"Saint Bartholomew's Road" was named after (what used to be) the local Anglican church (called, er, 'Saint Bartholomew's Church') which was positioned on the north side of Bluebell Hill Road, where Wickens Walk is now. There is *very* little info on that church, even though it was only torn down in the 1970's. It looked very impressive.

I'll add 'Donkey Hill' as 'loc_name'.
Karenina (2016-04-02 22:35:53+00:00): ESta laguna limita con el Partido de Rivadavia, en este momento está totalmente desbordada. Los canales han sido limpiados para evitar consecuencias en la ciudad. Igualmente preocupa su crecimiento debido a las lluvias excesivas y el agua que viene del norte.
Paul_012 (2016-09-11 20:04:56+00:00): Reverted by changeset 42049445 because the edit introduced layer conflicts.
hatul (2022-01-19 08:18:52+00:00): החלק הדרומי של מה שמסומן שמורת טבע הארבל הוא גן לאומי קרני חיטין
https://mavat.iplan.gov.il/SV4/4/99006755/5
zstadler (2022-01-19 09:30:09+00:00): נכון!

יותר מזה, שטח ההכרזה של שמורת טבע הארבל קטן בהרבה מהשטח שנלקח מתוכנית המתאר

https://mavat.moin.gov.il/MavatPS/Forms/Attachment.aspx?edid=99000694872121&edn=9E7F4CF79F854AC42D14962BC3A202C820030B2CFBC4508C7233DE31FCFFC9F2&opener=AttachmentError.aspx

בדף הזה תוכל לראות את ההחרגה שבוצעה

https://www.mavat.moin.gov.il/MavatPS/Forms/SV4.aspx?tid=4&et=5&pl_id=6vCdEltSxBU%2bPNpDqRjsgtHX987QVob%2fovFpxxdsNXdR9pNaihcX4meosY4kUFf48pNMZoqXn0C6VkkKB%2bh5C1mnB1j8%2fKNj
hatul (2022-01-19 10:48:48+00:00): תוקן
אבל את הגבולות החדשים של הארבל לקחתי מהרט״ג למרות שהם כנראה לא מדויקים.
user_5359 (2016-04-03 15:09:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool : We don't mark every building as school we mark the property of the school as school.
Durko_freemap (2016-04-04 05:45:12+00:00): zdravim marian, vseobecne kopirovanie udajov z akychkolvek map (elektronickych ci papierovych) je zakazane, ak na to nemate osobitne povolenie. Ak teda nemate povolenie od Here maps, vsetky tieto data vymazte. Vdaka Durko.
dr&mx (2016-04-01 20:04:15+00:00): отношение удалил — нет там таких знаков
d1g (2016-04-02 14:43:07+00:00): 1. уважаемый dr&mx, деревья никак не растут на автомобильных дорогах в Саратове, поставьте предыдущие объекты либо исправьте бордюры

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318776035
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318776039/history
d1g (2016-04-02 14:46:43+00:00): 2. Для чего нужно было смещать линии у дороги в 6-10 метров в ширину? Какую задачу это решает?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351808704/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351808755

В том числе абсолютно убитый участок из кирпичного лома:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31648304/history
d1g (2016-04-02 14:47:41+00:00): 3. Вы будете когда-нибудь указывать осмысленные source=* у пакетов правок? Или каждый раз нужно устраивать допрос с пристрастием?
kreuzschnabel (2016-12-12 16:30:48+00:00): Hi, I just noticed your changeset deleted the place node of Malham village, moving its tags to the landuse=residential. I’m afraid this is not considered good mapping practice, as explained in the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Residential areas should only have names if they are indeed the actual names of the areas (such as "Sunnyside Cottages") but should never depict entire places (which usually contain of more than the residential area). I altered this back to a new place node in this case, so there’s no need for action.
mueschel (2016-04-05 21:10:36+00:00): Hi tubbai11,
you put a "wh = yes" on this relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6096688
Is that supposed to be "wheelchair"?

Cheers, Jan
Piskvor (2016-04-03 20:36:32+00:00): Pozoruhodné, opravdu tam není. Podle pamětníků vzal za své při rekonstrukci v roce 2014. Díky za opravu - skouknu zbytek trati do Hostivaře, co ještě se tam změnilo.
imrobinson (2016-04-01 21:02:22+00:00): #hotosm-project-1487 #aagmapathon #m4r #usaid #peacecorps #pcmozambique #AIRSmoz2016source=bing #youthmappers #missingmaps #wvu #maptimemotown
sorbovit (2016-07-31 10:46:14+00:00): W 2014 roku ul. Kwiatkowskiego w Bielsku-Białej została przebudowana na odcinku od ronda Komorowicka/Czerwona/Kwiatkowskiego na długości około 200m w stronę ronda Grażyńskiego/Kwiatkowskiego. Całą jezdnię przesunięto na południe zmieniając również położenie zjazdów z ronda. Stan na zdjęciach z geoportalu jest nieaktualny. Wprowadziłem nowe położenie tych elementów w lutym 2015, a kolega pozmieniał wszystko zgodnie ze zdjęciami geoportalu. Proszę to przywrócić do stanu poprzedniego, ponieważ obecna konfiguracja zjadów jest nieprawidłowa.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Javier Gutiérrez (2016-07-04 13:42:50+00:00): Hello there,

great job on mapping on Macedonia. I have seen this issue on OSM Inpector:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=22.84053&lat=41.26375&zoom=18&opacity=0.26

Could you please fix it. The inner part of a building is done with relations. E.g.:

http://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-relations/

Thanks,
Javier
SomeoneElse (2016-04-04 23:46:48+00:00): Hi - any reason you've changed footway= to sidewalk= on the roads here?  It's not wrong, but they mean the same thing...
Also why "sidewalk=no" rather than "sidewalk=none" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115930683/history ?  http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/sidewalk#values suggests "=none" is the more popular by some margin.
Also are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359980268/history is "non-preserved" and yet the southern one isn't?
Cheers,
Andy
micha_k (2016-04-05 00:18:07+00:00): Hi Andy,
according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footway and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk the situation is as follows (the JOSM data validator pointed me at this):

sidewalk=* and footway=* differ in their purposes: footway=* is combined with highway=footway (mapping footway/sidewalk as separate way), sidewalk=* with any other highway=* (footway/sidewalk attached as tag to highway)

sidewalk=no is preferred

Please leave a note, if I am misunderstanding anything.

I'm not shure about way 359980268 (I don't know the location of the border between "normal" and heritage railway). Because of that, I did not change the railway=rail/railway=preserved tagging there, but just the service=/usage= tagging.

Greetings,
Micha
SomeoneElse (2016-04-05 00:33:04+00:00): Before "roadside footpath" tagging (footway or sidewalk) was widespread in OSM, the "footway" and "sidewalk" tags were used pretty much equally.  The British English words for "the place where you walk beside a road" (OSM uses British English rather than American English) are "pavement" and "footway" and so would normally one of those would be the tag to use, but unfortunately both have other meanings e.g. in American English.  That's why most people use "sidewalk".  I'm not sure where you get "sidewalk=no is preferred" from - taginfo shows that it clearly is not.
With regard to the service=/usage= tagging, if you don't know what the rail lines here are used for, how can you know what tagging is correct?
micha_k (2016-04-05 19:39:59+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk says "Synonymous with no. no is preferred, despite this tag being in wide use." This should be changed, if this is not correct...

The tag names usage and service are a little bit misleading, as they indicate infrastructure properties and do not depend on what trains actually run on this track. Usually, you can guess them correctly with a look on the track layout, railway equipment (signals, platforms, flank points, ...) and (general) knowledge of railway operation. The connection of between the railway lines in Matlock is a corner case, I added therefore a note on this.
SomeoneElse (2016-04-05 21:46:13+00:00): Re the wiki sidewalk page, it's wrong.  It's a wiki; if you think it's important, change it.  Personally I look at what tags mappers actually use rather than what one person wrote in the wiki 4 years ago.  There are many places where the wiki is wrong, irrelevant or simply does not get the nuances of various possibly interpretations across.  It's not possible for one person to fix them all - it would be a full-time job as per https://xkcd.com/386/ .
SomeoneElse (2016-04-11 13:11:15+00:00): Re the rail usage, what you've mapped is incorrect (I was there on Saturday and will update when I get the chance, with source details).
Please don't guess if you're not sure - instead add a note, and local mappers (who actually go out and survey things!) will check on it.  If you guess (a) the map is wrong and (b, even worse) we won't know the map is wrong.
user_5359 (2016-04-03 15:39:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407074886. If you need help: You are welcome!
PlaneMad (2017-07-05 14:25:17+00:00): Thank you for the edit. Is this motorway link really there?
PlaneMad (2017-07-05 14:27:33+00:00): According to http://i93exit4a.com/ this exit is proposed. I'm reverting this change.
Geography Canada (2016-04-06 13:32:40+00:00): Perhaps the M1 highway should be upgraded from trunk road to motorway? It does have five lanes: http://www.jfkoenig.com/files/content/002-projects/002-offices/002-mauritius-commercial-bank/image002.jpg. Trunk roads only have four lanes usually, right?
Ido Marom (2016-04-07 09:06:33+00:00): right
ZLima12 (2022-12-17 02:01:57+00:00): Hi,

It's been quite a while, so you may have figured this out already, but you shouldn't include abbreviations in street names like you've done here. Thanks for the contribution though; I'll fix it now.

Best,
John
cantrip (2022-12-17 23:36:16+00:00): Funny, the USPS insists on abbreviations. Will follow policy in future, thanks.
ZLima12 (2022-12-18 00:09:34+00:00): No worries, OSM is definitely the exception in this regard when compared to other maps. See here for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations
Hernan (2016-04-03 17:13:36+00:00): Betiana, voy a borrar el nodo de tu domicilio, porque no corresponde que este en OSM (no es un dato relevante), pero además es un riesgo para tu seguridad.
Warin61 (2026-01-19 01:02:07+00:00): HI,
The source is now deleted but avalible through wayback machine. The source is a map of cycling infrastructure that could be used to form routes. 
The relation 2170756 does not form a route .. so I have deleted the relation. What cycling infrastructure that is in OSM I have left alone.