piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Strubbl (2021-05-16 13:46:47+00:00): Hi emvee, sorry, i said blindy because the change was introduced without checking a second source. You were relying on the changeset, which introduced the osmose warning. 

Having bicycle=no is very strong when doing routing. Here it's possible to validate cause of the existing Mapillary and KartaView tracks. And i do not get your argument, where you see a bidirectional cycleway on the other side of the road? The way has the tagging oneway:bicycle=yes since some years already:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225735297
emvee (2021-05-16 15:19:21+00:00): Okay, I missed the oneway:bicycle=yes because the "cycleway" is mapped as highway=path as is normal in Germany. 

I am used to map these paths as highway=cycleway and then the map will show an arrow indicating the direction, so yes that is something I missed.
mueschel (2021-05-16 08:22:43+00:00): I reverted this changeset - markers from HotOsm tasks shouldn't be in the OSM database.
mueschel (2021-05-16 08:22:40+00:00): I reverted this changeset - markers from HotOsm tasks shouldn't be in the OSM database.
syntex (2021-05-17 23:54:27+00:00): This changeset is wrong. It is a vandalism
portalaventura (2021-05-15 13:19:45+00:00): ROMULLO BIAH, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Nordeste mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmne.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Ze0zohk1 (2021-05-21 06:16:06+00:00): Hallo ulonitz,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du bei dem Weg hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943249083 den Wert "kies" für surface verwendet hast. Wenn es sich um losen Kies handelt, sollte der Wert "pebblestone" verwendet werden. WEnn es sich um kleinen+feinen Schottert handelt "fine_gravel" und bei großem Schotter "gravel". 

Kannst du das noch korrigieren?

Viele Grüße
Hungerburg (2021-05-16 00:47:08+00:00): Hallo Zauberer, der Brunnen ist 15m weiter westlich und bereits eingetragen
Hungerburg (2021-05-16 00:48:02+00:00): Hallo Zauberer, ist die Bank wirklich im Brunnen drinnen (der dort ja nicht ist)?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-05-15 20:20:41+00:00): grazie per la correzione!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104734825
JeroenvanderGun (2021-05-24 11:19:47+00:00): This change prevents the road from rendering, as if it's not a road anymore. But the road still exists.

If we prefix the service highway type with abandoned, then we should also set a different new highway type to represent the current state of the road: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:
JeroenvanderGun (2021-05-24 11:31:46+00:00): Also we'd need to edit more than just this one link, since there are many more abandoned roads in this border crossing.
mueschel (2021-05-24 12:03:01+00:00): Both using the prefix 'abandoned' and using an extra 'abandoned' key are valid ways to add the information that an object is not maintained any more. 

If one or the other tag is ignored by some renderer, this is a software issue, but not an issue with tagging.
JeroenvanderGun (2021-05-24 13:21:02+00:00): This is a tagging issue, not a rendering issue. Indeed both tagging schemes are valid, but they have different meanings. abandoned=yes indicates the object still exists and hence can still be rendered. Tags with the abandoned: prefix describe a prior state of the object and hence should not be rendered on a current map.

The examples with abandoned:highway tags on the wiki therefore also include a highway tag describing the current state (which can be used to render the current state). For example, abandoned:highway=unclassified + highway=path (i.e. something used to be an unclassified road, and now it's degraded to just a path). The wiki also contains an example of landuse=quarry + abandoned=yes, i.e. an abandoned quarry is still a quarry and can still be rendered as a quarry.
mueschel (2021-05-24 13:31:10+00:00): That's not correct. Please see 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
"abandoned: - Still visible but fallen into serious disrepair".
If something doesn't exist any more, it can't be abandoned.
JeroenvanderGun (2021-05-24 14:29:01+00:00): The very next line on that page:

"For physical objects (e.g. buildings, towers or quarries), abandoned=yes is used more often."

This road is a physical object.

From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:abandoned%3Dyes:

"The abandoned=yes tag is used for building=* and other man-made features that have fallen into serious disrepair, appear to be unused, and can not be put back into operation without expensive repair, yet remain identifiable as the same feature. [...] Consider using abandoned: for features tagged with amenity=*, leisure=*, tourism=* and similar tags which can not be considered to describe the same feature if abandoned."

This abandoned feature (highway=service) is still identifiable as the same feature (highway=service). highway=service is still an accurate description of the current state. Hence highway=service + abandoned=yes is the correct tagging.

On the other hand, for example the oneway=yes tag can be changed into abandoned:oneway=yes, since this tag no longer applies to the current state of the object, despite still being recognisable.
mueschel (2021-05-24 14:37:27+00:00): It seems we have a completely different understanding of this key.

For me, 'oneway' can never be 'abandoned' because it's impossible to have a rule/regulation (and oneway is nothing else) "fallen into serious disrepair".
And actually this was the only reason I edited this way in the first place - 'abandoned:hgv' doesn't make any sense to me. 

Only because of this edit I also touched the 'highway' tag and changed it to my preferred tagging. I'm fine with having the 'abandoned' in a separate tag, but "rendering" can't be an argument to prefer one of them.
user_12625593 (2021-05-16 07:14:02+00:00): De brug is zwaar beschadigd, maar niet weg. Zou je hem terug willen zetten, als ontoegankelijk? Zie ook
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2669696
eggie (2021-05-16 08:39:45+00:00): Vandaag gaat de brug toch heus weg..
https://nos.nl/artikel/2380922-brugdek-aangevaren-brug-groningen-vandaag-weggetakeld
gr eggie
eggie (2021-05-16 08:42:20+00:00): Maar eerst gaan ze proberen 'm toch terug te leggen begrijp ik uit de info. De berichten spreken elkaar tegen.
user_12625593 (2021-05-16 09:00:30+00:00): Ja, is wat onduidelijke berichtgeving. Rijkswaterstaat wil m eerst proberen terug in vorm te krijgen. Kans lijkt mij klein dat dat lukt, maar wie weet ..
Jan Wilts (2021-05-16 09:36:48+00:00): Is het goed dat ik wacht tot duidelijkheid wat er gaat gebeuren voordat ik hem terug leg?
emvee (2021-05-16 09:42:39+00:00): Naar mijn idee is er in ieder geval iets te veel weg gehaald, alleen het brugdeel is weg, niet de aanbruggen en daar is wel een deel van verwijderd.
Jan Wilts (2021-05-16 09:48:46+00:00): Oke, mee eens. Deze heb ik in ieder geval al teruggetekend.
nurdafur (2023-04-06 20:10:46+00:00): Hallo JimKnopf

Du hast in diesem Changeset den Chistenpass zugefügt. Mitten in Unterengstringen gibt es doch bestimmt keinen Pass.

Liebe Grüsse
Urs
JimKnopf2012 (2023-04-06 20:54:54+00:00): Guten Abend Urs
Dieser Hügel und Fuss/Veloweg (Sennenbüelfuessweg) ist dorfkundigen Unterengstringern als Chistenpass bekannt. Natürlich ist es kein Pass im Sinne von Gotthard oder Simplon. 
Gruss JimKnopf
Lezurex (2023-06-05 07:39:02+00:00): Hallo JimKnopf

Mir ist der Chistenpass auch gerade aufgefallen (war relativ prominent in OsmAnd zu sehen).
Ich denke, loc_name=Chistenpass wäre hier auf den Wegen besser dafür geeignet. Das Attribut ist gerade für solche Namen gedacht.
Ein wirklicher Gebirgspass ist es ja auch nicht (nur weil der (inoffizielle) Name auf "pass" endet).

Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#loc_name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mountain_pass

LG Lenny
JimKnopf2012 (2023-06-07 19:42:13+00:00): Hallo Lenny
Danke für deine Rückmeldung.
Ich habe dies nun angepasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137069507
schönen Abend
Gruss JimKnopf
Lezurex (2023-06-07 20:13:19+00:00): Hallo JimKnopf

Danke fürs Anpassen, ich hatte das aber leicht anders gemeint. Den Node (den einzelnen Punkt, den du jetzt noch bearbeitet hast) würde ich löschen.
Dann auf den einzelnen Ways (Linien) des Sennenbüelfussweges (oder zumindest jene Teile, die lokal als Chistenpass bezeichnet werden) den loc_name-Tag hinzufügen.
So hast du dann klar getaggt, dass genau dieser Weg diesen lokalen Namen hat. Ein Punkt wäre da ein wenig ungenau.

Schönen Abend und LG
Lenny
JimKnopf2012 (2023-06-08 04:13:21+00:00): Hallo Lenny

Besten Dank für die Verbesserung.
Sollte nun so angepasst sein.

Gruss JimKnopf
pbnoxious (2021-05-17 08:05:12+00:00): Hello,

because you are adding a lot of chinese   "names" for amenities as small as distilleries (also in other changesets like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104737629 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104730057 ): Just adding transliterations (the same name in different characters) is usually not done in OSM as this can be automatized. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration

So if you are sure that a place has a Chinese name that is not just the German name in Chinese characters feel free to add it, otherwise you could just leave that to the machines and focus on different improvements to the map.

(it is also strange to have places with just Chinese names in German villages, I assume e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8733968104 also has a German name? It would be nice if these were added as well!)

Happy mapping,
pbnoxious
Brian@Stone (2021-05-17 10:42:44+00:00): Thank you for telling me this, new knowledge get.
Syl (2021-05-15 14:32:47+00:00): Bonjour, pour infos des images aériennes plus récentes sont disponibles pour Rennes et alentours (Rennes - 2020 dans le menu imagerie).
ottwiz (2021-05-17 12:00:41+00:00): Reverted.
vojtechzaboril (2022-01-31 09:06:46+00:00): Dobrý den, tento dům byl zbourán cca před rokem. Pokud zde nestojí nový se stejným půdorysem, je toto špatně https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943260984
Díky
marc__marc (2023-05-24 22:52:57+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/391869583
que veux dire date_de_val ? check_date ?
Cordialement,
Marc
noelbov (2023-05-25 13:18:12+00:00): Hello,
It's some kind of metadata indicating the date of applying the relation. It was used for the Vhello cyclenetwork a few years ago, first by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jakka and later by myself.
Anyway it is discardable... you may silently delete this tag...
Regards
portalaventura (2021-05-15 14:28:05+00:00): Eduardo Ayabe, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Paraná mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmpr.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-18 05:18:52+00:00): Hello. You're damaging tourism data by breaking down objects into parts, tourism tags go into one object, description into another. I will revert your changes in Lithuania.
CjMalone (2021-06-30 21:07:31+00:00): Hey, looks like this one got opening_hours=Closed from #55379951. Before it was turned into Dominos (#58389562). So it was the opening_hours tag that was bad, not the poi.

Re added in #107228643
user_2066394 (2021-05-15 15:18:13+00:00): shop=doors war kreative Tür :-)
G_P_J (2021-05-17 08:09:28+00:00): Cześć, dodałeś sam numer budynku bez podania miejscowości i ulicy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/926878988 Ten punkt adresowy istnieje: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4538507287 Wystarczyło go przenieść na budynek, ewentualnie połączyć z budynkiem. Przy korzystaniu ze SC warto później weryfikować zmiany dotyczące punktów adresowych. Samo dodanie numeru budynku generuje błędy, które sprzątam od kilku miesięcy.
kakiremora (2021-05-17 08:38:08+00:00): zaraz je usunę
kakiremora (2021-05-17 09:22:48+00:00): właśnie później się zastanawiałem czy w ogóle jest sens dodawania tych adresów do budynków;

ogólnie mówiąc sprzątnięte

Pozdrawiam
ChehrehBargi (2023-06-18 07:39:03+00:00): سلام، ضمن تشکر از شما جهت اهتمام به ثبت وضعیت نقشه؛
شما روستاهای کرکزلو، ترک، مزه جین و زرتشت آباد را طبق قوانین ویکی ثبت نکرده‌اید و ثبت شما ایراداتی دارد. مرز روستا باید با برچسب منطقه مسکونی (landuse=residential) و نام روستا و تعداد جمعیت و سایر اطلاعات هم در نقطه‌‌ای وسط روستا با برچسب place=village ثبت گردد.
متاسفانه در صورت تکرار این مورد، گزارش خواهید شد.
ChehrehBargi (2023-06-18 07:39:47+00:00): Hello, while thanking you for registering the status of the map;
You have not registered the villages of Karakzlu, Turk, Meze Jin and Zaratashtabad according to Wiki rules, and your registration has errors. The border of the village should be registered with the label of the residential area (land use=residential) and the name of the village, the number of population and other information in the middle points of the village with the label of location=village.
Simple, if this case is repeated, it will be reported.
user_3022894 (2021-05-17 14:33:13+00:00): Hallo Christoph,

es mag vielleicht seinen Sinn haben, postal_code an Straßen zu pappen, dazu kann ich persönlich leider nicht soo viel sagen. Aber andere Mapper scheinen das zum Teil anders zu sehen, schau' doch bitte mal in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87066450 

Da wurde massenhaft postal_code wieder von Straßen entfernt. Ich dacht, ich informiere euch mal gegenseitig hier kurz, damit nicht ein Edit-War heraufzieht.

Vielleicht mögt ihr euch über das Tagging irgendwie absprechen, ggf. auch im Forum?

Sonst fügt der eine postal_code hinzu und der andere löscht es.

Viele Grüße, Lukas
ToniE (2021-05-15 15:27:31+00:00): Hallo Martin,

access=private wäre hier (statt access=permit) auf den Wegen innerhalb des Geländes korrekter, denn so ohne Weiteres darf man da nicht hin, oder?

access=permit, impliziert, dass man den Weg benutzen kann und dass es einfach ist eine Genehmigung zu bekommen.

access=private würde ich auch statt private=staff mappen.

Gruß,
Toni
ToniE (2021-05-15 15:28:01+00:00): Ähm, vergessen: Es ist wohl auch ein Zaun drumrum, oder?
portalaventura (2021-05-15 15:32:42+00:00): Alexandre Gorzoni, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de Mato Grosso mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmMT.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
ToniE (2021-05-15 15:35:14+00:00): Hall Martin,

handelt es sich beiden beiden Dingern um ein Tor im Zaun?

barrier=gate

mit 

locked=yes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:locked

Gruß,
Toni
Martin Kolberg (2021-05-15 16:00:16+00:00): Da ist ein Zaun drum rum und man kommt in das Wasserschutzgebiet nur mit Schlüssel rein.
Auch der kleine Fußweg führt durch zwei mittels Schloß versperrte Tore, so daß man definitiv nicht durch kommt. :-(
Wenn Du möchtest, kannst Du das bitte ändern, denn bislang gab es keinerlei Hinweis in der Karte, daß man da nicht durch kann.
ToniE (2021-05-15 16:16:22+00:00): Ja, ich schaue mir das nachher mal an, wenn du fertig bist.
TapiJI (2021-05-15 15:52:13+00:00): Añado camino
DaveF (2021-05-17 16:39:28+00:00): Hi
Why have you split the park, pitch & wood into MP relations, yet adding no other relations to the ways? Doing so adds no value to the data.
Please don't used amenity_1. If it's a cricket pavilion, add kindergarten as a node.
DaveF (2021-05-17 16:44:34+00:00): Hi
You've no joined the park ways correctly meaning it doesn't render.
eggie (2021-05-15 16:36:10+00:00): Splash,
Mocht je zin hebben om de routerelatie te herstellen van dat MTB pad kijk dan eens naar editor JOSM
Met iD gaat de routerelatievolgorde verloren.
Je kunt met die editor geen wegen splitsen met een routerelatie. 
Dat is hier ook het geval. Van de week al even mee bezig geweest, maar het is een hele puzzel.
Voor de uitdaging
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710    
Je werkt dan met een relatie venster en het is de truc om alles weer in de juiste volgorde te krijgen
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-15 18:27:52+00:00): Wandelroute WaddenWandelen - Texel - 01 - 't Horntje-De Koog  is ook z'n volgorde kwijt.
Ook en uitdaging
eggie (2021-05-15 18:33:00+00:00): WaddenWandelen - Texel - 01 - 't Horntje-De Koog hersteld
splash600 (2021-05-16 09:49:45+00:00): Ok! Ik was al aan het kijken hoe dat moet met relaties voor een mtb lus. Blijkbaar moet it niet te veel in iD gaan sleutelen... Ik ga me eerst verdiepen in JOSM, zal wel even duren :-)
eggie (2021-05-16 10:05:16+00:00): Top!  Die mtb route loopt niet weg en alles lag al door elkaar voordat je begon.
gr eggie
jpennycook (2021-05-16 14:18:20+00:00): Hi!
You added a mini roundabout on Folly Hill - according to Mapillary, it's a full roundabout rather than a miniroundabout, so I've added that instead.

Jon
yoi (2021-05-17 06:53:18+00:00): Thank you. Yes it's indeed a full roundabout. I didn't know how to map roundabout, so just put a miniroundabout. Thanks for correcting it.
user_2066394 (2021-05-15 16:00:43+00:00): Für manche Gebäude sind die Hausnummern jetzt doppelt eingetragen, auf dem Umriss und auf dem Eingang, in der Folge ergibt das Duplikate.
5p1sch1 (2021-05-15 16:03:59+00:00): Danke, das werde ich ändern!
Mastrick_Mapper (2021-05-15 15:49:01+00:00): Correction: East end not West end.
b-holdet (2024-04-21 05:00:17+00:00): Jeg er lidt nysgerrig mht. til navnet på bakkerne "Blæsbjerge".
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943303220

Hvilken metode har du brugt for at finde navnet på bakkerne i området?

Det findes i SDFI-kortet DTK25, men ellers kan jeg ikke rigtig finde navnet andre steder.
antonr (2024-04-23 12:15:57+00:00): Det kan jeg desværre ikke huske - det er trods alt også næsten 3 år siden - men mine kilder er jo angivet som luftfoto, LIDAR, og survey. De to første kan næppe have hjulpet, så måske har der været en form for skiltning? Som sagt kan jeg ikke huske det, så dit gæt er ca. lige så godt som mit, tror jeg.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-15 18:23:22+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943304632 isn't very clear on the imagery - but there is something there.  However, its likely to be rectangular - make sure that you square rectangular buildings with "Q" in the editor.
Best Regards,
Andy
Jakka (2021-05-15 18:47:28+00:00): "Bridge was destroyed" there is notting left to see ? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts
PatrickCo (2021-05-15 20:35:30+00:00): The bridge as been destroyed and the materials has been used to close one side of the path. That part of the path is not practicable anymore as the materials of the bridge forms a mound on about 10 meters long and 2 meter high covered by small trees effectively closing the path.. There is a sign at the entrance of the path indicating that it is a patch without issue. The other side is not practicable either as it is too steep. There are some hard part of the bridge that can bee seen but most is covered by earth and vegetation has grown on it.. The Ravel 163 path is around 4 meter below either steep sides (~60% inclination on one side and ~75% on the over side).
Jakka (2021-05-16 06:48:49+00:00): OK. We do not add this. thx.
Marko Grubisic (2021-05-17 17:11:03+00:00): Oj je to res cesta?
Marko Grubisic (2021-05-17 17:12:19+00:00): Ožji kolovoz?
mat9000 (2021-05-29 11:28:54+00:00): mostek był chyba tylko tymczasowy, od zeszłego roku już go nie ma.
Antoni_W (2021-05-29 17:24:48+00:00): Masz rację, sprawdziłem dziś i mostku nie ma. Dzięki za komentarz i poprawienie mapy.
Mordechai23 (2021-05-15 18:08:55+00:00): Tak, stacji prostownikowej ;)
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-15 16:31:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104741254 where the changeset comment is: please do not make edits to this waterbody at present since it is subject to an edit war.
wermak (2022-05-03 03:04:12+00:00): Vorübergehende Baukräne sollte man nicht unbedingt in die Karte eintragen, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8734385643.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3113508

Schöne Grüße
IanH (2021-05-18 01:04:35+00:00): The bounding box covers a large part of the world.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104741241
user_11418917 (2021-05-15 18:00:57+00:00): The spam user edited it in and continued his vandalism:      https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9326283
user_11418917 (2021-05-15 18:01:52+00:00): In this Changeset. he edited after you.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104744177
southglos (2021-05-15 18:40:36+00:00): Hi.  Have tidied up a little for you; hope I've captured what you were trying to achieve!
SomeoneElse (2021-05-15 18:24:29+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943313152 doesn't seem to match the underlying imagery at all.
Best Regards,
Andy
SecretOfSence (2021-05-24 13:11:38+00:00): Не вносите устаревшие данные, вы снесли уже построенную улицу, по которой ездят и ходят, не надо так.
Ингвар (2021-05-24 13:30:12+00:00): Какие устаревшее данные? Дорога на 14 мая ещё не была готова, не говоря об открытии движения: https://sun9-62.userapi.com/impg/OiZHvBCVTFfhs_yCqTwcxAp0W8bwNLmYoFc_dA/d7qqtaozjvs.jpg?size=1280x850&quality=96&sign=ef1ca7ca442b5cc452868fb8e0da7022&type=album
Ингвар (2021-05-24 13:31:28+00:00): https://sun9-38.userapi.com/impg/r8z1pvay-zNXXFBWCDmplKYJvtwJLPsXeNDBrg/cmYttnFIk9w.jpg?size=1280x850&quality=96&sign=f44f2350a8bc14ef7f9fe6ccd409a79c&type=album
Константин Гам (2021-05-24 13:34:55+00:00): Таким, что днем ранее был гравий :)

В любом случае, ломать навигацию не надо, вот о чем Secret писал
Jakka (2021-05-15 19:06:34+00:00): Heb de vormen van gebouwen bijgewerkt. en gecodeerd
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104741879
MxxCon (2021-05-16 02:39:14+00:00): Hello.
Please note that changeset comments should describe what your edits, not advertisement of your business. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more detailed explanation.