piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freeExec (2017-05-24 07:25:51+00:00): КАПСОМ писать не надо. Так же большого смысла расставлять адреса POI, когда они находятся в здании, у которого указан адрес - нет.
gootax (2017-05-24 08:41:20+00:00): я имя капсом не должен был написать,
если всё таки я это сделал,
извините. сейчас исправлю.

Так же большого смысла расставлять адреса POI, когда они находятся в здании, у которого указан адрес - нет.

Нам так надо для работы, это не нарушает правила ОСМ?
freeExec (2017-05-24 09:31:54+00:00): >Нам так надо для работы, это не нарушает правила ОСМ?

Это плохой тон, мапить под рендер, а в данном случае под ПО. Т.к. подавляющее большинство поддерживает обработку POI внутри здания, мало кто их расставляет. Т.е. вы будете получать заведомо меньше данных, т.к. не хотите обрабатывать адреса со зданий.
Часто так же эту дублирующую информацию удаляют.
Поэтому я вам настоятельно рекомендую научить своё ПО обрабатывать данные полностью.
gootax (2017-05-24 09:40:04+00:00): аа, ясно. тогда мы:
- 1 неделю будем на карте всё равно правки делать, чтобы сейчас была возможность работать
- и будем у себя правки тоже делать, чтобы потом обновиться и не делать больше таких правок

ТаАк приемлемо?
freeExec (2017-05-24 10:02:30+00:00): Да.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:25:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514501 where the changeset comment is: Revert all edits by MiePrzKom because we have to assume they are fake after no reaction received to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1419
berndw (2017-06-21 15:59:29+00:00): Das dürfte aber ein Fußweg als ein highway=track sein, Richtung Wilhelmstraße ist das nur eine Parkplatzzufahrt sein
aen32 (2017-06-22 07:03:07+00:00): Ja, richtig. Habe das korrigiert => changeset 49737430
freeExec (2017-05-24 10:09:12+00:00): Слово "Супермаркет" не должно фигурировать в name, только имя собственное.
gootax (2017-05-24 10:11:42+00:00): исправил
djex (2017-05-23 16:51:04+00:00): Doublon
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-08-11 09:34:27+00:00): Bonjour, les POI tels que les boutiques doivent être placés au bord du bâtiment qui les abrite - et non sur le way de la rue au bord de laquelle ils sont. J'ai corrigé pour certains des noeuds de ce changeset.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:27:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:34:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:23:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:07:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:26:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-01 07:13:23+00:00): Reported here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=647483#p647483

by 

tdctdctdc
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mueschel (2017-05-28 10:50:21+00:00): Hi,
you used the key "traffic_signals:directions" 16 times - the correct spelling would be "traffic_signals:direction". Could you fix this?

Cheers, Jan
econacct (2017-06-10 11:39:58+00:00): Why are all these new nodes/individual measurements against straight baseline http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32320985 even necessary, especially when the result differs so markedly from straightforward parallel copy of the baseline itself, moved out to 12 nautical miles/22.22km? It now results in "shifting" boundary when zooming between "Standard" and "Humanitarian" layers (3km and 1km)

Was there a problem with the baseline..?
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Cascafico (2017-05-24 06:43:31+00:00): Ciao Francesco.

ho staccato il piazzale dalla strada: dalle lunghe discussioni nella ML nazionale, pare che sia preferibile.

Poi apparivano sul rendering giallo gli alberelli del rendering foresta; per evitare ciò ho inserito il piazzale con ruolo "inner" nel multipoligono "outer" foresta.
poornibadrinath (2017-05-25 05:38:44+00:00): Hi,
 I came across your edits and noticed you have deleted a section of major primary road and re added a new road which is not connected to any highway. May I ask the reason for this change. Also, please refrain from deleting old features without any solid reason and make sure your edits do not break anything. Could you please revert this changeset to what it was before? Thanks! 
Best,
Poornima Badrinath
flarios (2017-05-25 12:12:47+00:00): Hi, Poornima
first, sorry for my english is not my native language, I live in this area, and the street is wrong Dr Jorge Jimenez Cantu finish in that point, In addition to that, there are several closed streets that is not easy to see from the satellite image, this is why the colony changes and there is no step between these more than main streets, if you are a little more specific in the change you have Doubt, I will gladly justify it, I just want to contribute to the project and I try to do it in the best way.

REGARDS
poornibadrinath (2017-05-26 09:59:12+00:00): Hi, 
 Thanks for the reply. This particular way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495506013/history#map=19/19.51587/-99.26535) is not connected to the primary road Avenida Lomas Verdes. It shows a segment has been deleted. I was asking why that segment was deleted and why a new road was added instead of that.
best,
Poornima
flarios (2017-05-26 12:22:49+00:00): Hi, that my friend is a mistake jejeje, I correct the road, thanks for show my mistake.
REGARDS
Fernando.
karitotp (2017-05-24 18:40:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to Openstreetmap. Could you please confirm is this is a park, it looks like more a leisure=pitch.
Regards
Alexander-II (2017-05-23 20:15:30+00:00): Привет. Не надо на велопешеходных дорожках убирать highway=path в пользу highway=footway. Верните, пожалуйста, на место, где он был. Если не верите, то могу сослаться на вики и ПДД.
Alexander-II (2017-05-23 20:16:05+00:00): На самих тропинках знак есть (но знаки у нас неверные) и на план схеме дорожка тоже присутствует.
Felis Pimeja (2017-05-23 21:36:11+00:00): Ok. Давайте обсудим. Почему path? Я руководствуюсь сложившейся практикой тегирования. Она же подтверждается wiki: "В российской практике, где юридические ограничения имеют меньшее значение, использование highway=path сводится к обозначению стихийных пешеходных троп, троп, используемых для передвижения на лыжах, велосипеде, лошадях. Дорожки, которые предназначены для перемещения пешком, на велосипеде или на лошади, а значит, не являющиеся стихийными, следует обозначать тэгами highway=footway, highway=cycleway и highway=bridleway."
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dpath
Alexander-II (2017-05-23 22:58:16+00:00): Все очень просто. Заходите на страницы: 1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_Universal_Tag 2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle 3) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway#Examples На 2 и 3 указан (как я понимаю) предпочтительный вариант тегирования через highway=cycleway + foot= + segregeated=. О нюансах выбора между highway=path и highway=cycleway упомянуто тут https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway#Foot_access_on_cycleways  Других способов, отличных от этих двух, обозначить велопешеходные дорожки я не встречал. В дефолтных заготовках JOSM оно в таком же виде (hw=path). Рендер на osm.org такое понимает и рисует соответствующе. hw=footway с аксесс тегами - это уже пешеходная дорожка, по которой можно ехать на велосипеде (если открыть ПДД, то там нету запрета на езду на велосипеде по пешеходным дорожкам; по тротуарам есть рекомендация ехать в крайних случаях).

Про стихийность троп в русскоязычной вики - это фантазия русскоязычного сегмента. Который перевел "путь" как "тропинка" и исковеркал изначальный смысл "траектория от точки А до точки Б" до "стихийная тропа". На англоязычной странице никакого упоминания стихийности не подразумевается https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath Изобретать свой (локальный) велосипед и использовать отличным от остального мира образом — это такое. Порочное.
Alexander-II (2017-05-23 23:00:54+00:00): Если вкратце, то я не против замены highway=path
+ foot=designated
+ bicycle=designated
+ segregated=yes на highway=cycleway + foot=designated + segregated=yes. Если уж path так не нравится :)
Но с highway=footway соглашаться не готов.
Alexander-II (2017-05-24 01:01:48+00:00): Поправлю себя насчет упомянутого нюанса в https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway#Foot_access_on_cycleways. Вчитался получше. Никакого нюанса нет. Те же два варианта тегирования.
Felis Pimeja (2017-05-24 08:45:12+00:00): Ok. Спасибо за ссылки. Изучил англовики. Вижу, я отстал от жизни. Перетегировал на path. Заодно поправил везде surface.
Alexander-II (2017-05-24 14:53:57+00:00): Спасибо
Andrea Musuruane (2017-05-24 08:54:20+00:00): Ciao Federico e benvenuto su OSM. Le chiese non si taggano con historic=monument, che identifica invece "A memorial object [...] built to remember, show respect to a person or group of people or to commemorate an event.". Per una mappatura corretta puoi leggere: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship Inoltre, non è necessario tradurre il nome in inglese. La chiave name:en deve essere inserita se esiste un nome inglese. Per quanto riguarda la fontanella, invece, sembra troppo vicina al centro delll'incrocio (circa 1m), almeno a giudicare dalle varie immagini aeree. Ciao, Andrea
Federico Tacca (2017-05-24 18:58:27+00:00): Ciao Andrea, ti ringrazio per i consigli. vorrei modificare a questo punto i miei punti ma non me lo fa più fare, è normale?

Grazie
Andrea Musuruane (2017-05-25 08:48:35+00:00): Ciao Federico, vedo che usi MAPS.ME. Purtroppo non lo conosco. Però mi sembra strano che non ti faccia modificare quanto già inserito. Puoi comunque usare un altro editor come iD o JOSM (su PC). Ciao, Andrea
calfarome (2017-05-24 19:24:07+00:00): Hi catarinapeixoto, 
Thank you for your map edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see that you have added a area with 'name=Infantário'. Is this a kindergarten or childcare? Please review this wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten and then fix it.
eggie (2017-05-23 19:23:02+00:00): Wat is nu precies de bedoeling van die lijn die je tekent over de turnhoutse weg? Wanneer je reageert zouden we kunnen helpen.
eggie (2017-05-23 19:23:56+00:00): Je meent toch niet echt dat dit de busverbindingen zijn? Heb je je ingelezen?
Graag reactie..
eggie (2017-05-23 19:53:12+00:00): Buslijnen is specialistenwerk. Ik haal de opgeplakte buslijn op de Turnhoutseweg eraf bij geen reactie. Busroutes zitten als een relatie op de weg. Je kunt aan M Deen de vorige mapper vragen hoe dat moet en of hij wil helpen.
ook op het forum kun je vragen stellen. 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
eggie (2017-05-23 20:03:00+00:00): Een heel eind hier uit de buurt in Hulsel, maar in dezelfde changeset heb ik de sportvelden aangepast zodat ze in osm en andere kaarten renderen. Nu was het pitch op pitch. Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Tip.. zet minder edits in een changeset.
eggie (2017-05-23 20:08:41+00:00): De way zonder verdere tags .. wellicht als busroute heb ik verwijderd. Dat geeft vervuiling op de kaart. de bushalte staat er nog.
eggie (2017-05-24 05:49:05+00:00): Dit zijn nuttige aanvullingen. Laat wel in het commentaar blijken wat je edit inhoudt svp. 
Probeer ook het gebied waarin je werkt in je changeset klein te houden.
In het begin volgen wij de edits van startende mappers.... ook om te helpen.
emergency99 (2017-05-23 20:54:51+00:00): Inwiefern "versucht" und "korrigieren"?
eggie (2017-05-23 19:15:30+00:00): Klopt je commentaar nog wel bij je edits?
naoliv (2017-11-23 12:04:25+00:00): Leonardo, a classificação das cidades é dada pela sua população.
Uma cidade classificada como "village" não significa que seja uma vila de fato, mas apenas que possui uma população menor do que 10 mil habitantes.
Dê uma olhada em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:place#Brasil para mapear corretamente os locais em suas futuras edições.
GinaroZ (2017-05-23 19:39:41+00:00): You might want to remove these nodes: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pfe and maybe add the ref to your nodes?
Also, did you check the offset for the DG imagery? Might not matter too much for power towers but usually it's a bit off compared to Bing.
nimapper (2017-05-24 06:47:17+00:00): I have now removed some 132 kV lines that have definitely been demolished according to imagery (actually retagged them as historic:power=line). I don't have any numbers on the new towers thus I can't add refs. Maybe you know some numbers (a few will do and the rest by counting). Regarding offsets the DG imagery seems to be fairly consistent with Bing and Mapbox where available. Otherwise the offset is likely to vary from tower position to the next one thus impractical to compensate for (in many places there are no or few gps traces).
GinaroZ (2017-05-24 14:42:04+00:00): Here's one marked under construction with a ref: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2296370179 - use the overpass-turbo link and click "run" to find more.
Allroads (2017-05-31 16:21:50+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48923166
hier heb je een de node verplaatst, waarom?
en dan heb je de poi man_made=tower verwijdert en de klok toegevoegd.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49126167#map=19/52.68072/5.95054
Nu zie ik dat op dat punt de omlijning van het gebouw vertrokken is en niet meer overeenkomt met de BAG.
Henkvanheerde (2017-05-31 19:06:34+00:00): de node stond verkeerd, buiten het gebouw, aangepast volgens aanwijzingen van Eggie.
De tag bij de toren stond op 'man_made', niet op 'toren' (en die kon ik als symbool niet vinden), wel is dit een klok (uurwerk) naast 'belltower'.
Dat de omlijning veranderd is, lijkt op een ongeluk. Mijn muis doet kennelijk vreemd.
nammala (2017-05-25 05:24:04+00:00): Hi TheBugma,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding parks as a node and also in the centre of the road, which is not that appropriate. May I know the source of adding this.

Regards,
nammala
TheBugma (2017-05-25 17:39:27+00:00): Hi, I made a mistake yesterday since I didnt know you could draw an area to designate where a park is. I'm currently fixing Parque La Loma to do it properly

Both Plaza Bolivia and Plaza Brasil are indee in the middle of the road, Plaza Bolivia has a bunch of trees on it and on Plaza Brasil there isn't a big transit of vehicles, a lot of kid play on it.

That's the explanation, I live on this residential area so when I logged in I wanted to improve it to make the map more accurate.

Thank you fir your comment and feedback and sorry if I made any mistakes, English isn't my first language
nammala (2017-05-26 03:44:33+00:00): No problem Bugma, Great that you have been improving your neighborhood. Keep up the good work.
Always happy to help.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:38:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:16:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
angys (2017-05-24 06:17:36+00:00): Thank You.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:24:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:29:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:50:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Glassman (2017-05-23 23:39:17+00:00): FYI - We don't use abbreviated street names. I went ahead and changed it.
Weltstaat (2017-05-23 18:53:22+00:00): Hi,
der Praterstern sollte von Grund auf überarbeitet werden (genauso wie Meidling und Westbahnhof). Viele Fehler und geometrisch sehr ungenau. Danke für die Korrekturen einstweilen! Ich hätte demnächst auch einen survey gemacht.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-05-24 06:07:29+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
Гаврилюк Андрій (2017-05-23 18:30:53+00:00): Please close this change request, I made a mistake)
grin (2017-05-26 08:15:13+00:00): Thanks for editing Hungary from... Brasil? :-)
zwaygp (2017-05-23 21:40:23+00:00): Should say: Updates to streets and POIs in Kiev. #Kaart Ground Survey 2017
Dalkvist (2017-05-24 12:41:47+00:00): Hi nice to see more people helping to make the map better. 
 
What are you trying to do? 
 
It looks like you added a gps trace as untagged ways and mistakenly moved a turning circle across the water. If you want I can revert the changes as point you towards some beginner guides.
 
If you have any questions feel free to message me.
mauroesguerroto (2017-05-24 19:51:32+00:00): Hi,
Yes please. Revert the changes.
I just wanted to draw a trace of a hiking trail and then when I wanted to erase it because I noticed I might be screwing up data already at openmaps I couldn't do it.
Thanks a bunch and sorry.
Dalkvist (2017-06-01 12:11:51+00:00): No harm done, I reverted it now. If you want to learn the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide is a good place to start.
thror (2017-05-31 11:50:13+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM

Sadly - you changed the wrong location and destroyed some correct information.

Your update is to the house with  "Neuhelgoländer Weg 1" that you changed to adress ".... Weg 7" and removing that restaurant that still exists there (Neu-Helgoland) - see their old info in the history: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43165685/history

Trattoria di Mare is located to the west probably it replaced Cafe L&B see http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2006716280

Please correct your error
KübelBlatt (2017-05-31 16:01:16+00:00): mb sry. I fixed the adress and also added more information that I could gather. Should be good now :)
neuhausr (2017-05-26 17:12:37+00:00): Hi karitotp, this is a case where it might've been nice for you to leave a changeset comment or contact the user who created these features--it is a new user who seems to work in this area, but who maybe could've done a better job tagging etc. Cheers
solgule (2017-06-06 15:55:42+00:00): Hej Wihest!

Jag såg att du ändrat stigarna i Mariebergsskogen tillbaka till path. Jag ändrade från path till track för inte så länge sedan, efter att noga läst vad som gäller för OSM. Med andra ord så har du tagit bort mina ändringar, som var helt enligt OSM's rekommendationer.
Tänk på att bara för att du tror det är fel så behöver det inte vara det, särskilt inte om det ändrats nyligen. Bättre att fråga först, annars riskeras mycket tid gå förlorad om man håller på att ändra fram och tillbaka på grund av personlig åsikt. Bättre försöka följa OSM's rekommendationer och inte hitta på egna regler.

I skog bör man använda track om bredden är tillräckligt stor för att ett fyrhjuligt fordon ska kunna köra.
Anledningen att track används och inte path är för att kunna skilja på olika stora stigar i skogen. Det har inget med snöplogning och liknande att göra. Det kanske finns någon tagg som går att använda för underhåll, som du kan sätta på både path och track.

OBS!: För track finns det inget krav att motorfordon är tillåtet, som det felaktigt står sist jag kollade i de svenska rekommendationerna. De svenska rekommendationerna kan vem som helst ändra i, så de kan innehålla personliga åsikter och fel (jag orkar inte bry mig om alla som går efter vad de själva tycker, svenska delen av OSM wiki verkar ha en hel del personliga åsikter, precis som svenska wikipedia har en massa vinklat åsiktsskräp). Skiljer de svenska från de internationella, utan att det kan motiveras med någon svensk lag, så är det fel. Hur ska vi annars få en enhetlig karta över hela världen om svenskar hittar på egna regler utan motivering?

Tänk även på att cykling inte är tillåten i Mariebergsskogen, så att ha taggen bicycle=yes är kanske inte så bra, även om cykling är möjlig om man vill bryta mot parkens regler.

Citat från OSM rekommendationer om hur path och track används:
-----------------------------------------
"Things that all agree on

    highway=footway
        Something, where walking is allowed and possible for someone. (walking might be and is allowed and possible elsewhere, too)

    highway=cycleway:
        Something, where cycling is allowed and possible
        Pedestrian access undefined - might be country dependent but not supported (yet), so there has about always been a suggestion in the wiki to always tag it with foot=no/yes/designated.

    highway=path:
        Something not wide enough for four wheeled vehicles
        OR where motorvehicles are forbidden (unless otherwise indicated by snowmobile/agricultural=designated or similar).

    Anything with wheelchair=no:
        Unsuitable for wheelchair users or other mobility impaired

    Anything with highway=footway + foot=no (+ snowmobile=yes) would be silly

    highway=track
        Implies that it's wide enough for a small motorcar to drive on, even if it's illegal."
--------------
Slut citat. Du kan citerad text här:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Path_controversy

Hälsningar,
/Solgule.