piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
satomigrim (2017-01-27 10:47:27+00:00): Thanks for messaging me. As far as I'm aware these are all walking paths with designated seating, exercise stops and playgrounds all along. Bicycle use is permitted but pedestrians have priority per the signage. Most cycle-ways follow the painted lanes along the road now. I have adjusted the 'Allowed Access' to reflect bicycle use. I will recheck tomorrow and adjust if I am wrong. Thanks.
nevw (2017-01-27 10:54:34+00:00): On the OSM the 'cycle-ways that follow the painted lanes along the road' are called cyclelanes. Cycleways are different and have a cycle way sign (picture of a cycle) and almost always give pedestrians access and priority. 
I will be up there looking for signs later and re-map the cycleways, if necessary.
Happy mapping, your additions are a big improvement to the area  :)
nevw (2017-01-27 10:59:23+00:00): actually...the cyclelanes are of course cycleways as well .
maxolasersquad (2017-01-30 17:56:54+00:00): Unless the name of this body of water is "Holding Pond", then it should not be named as such.
neuhausr (2017-04-24 15:43:07+00:00): Hi from looking at the aerial imagery, it doesn't appear there is a pond or park at this location. Do you have an explanation? Thanks
maxolasersquad (2017-01-30 17:52:49+00:00): Is there really a park here? It looks more like residential housing.
tyr_asd (2017-09-07 08:05:24+00:00): Hi. Bitte mappe keine Phantasie-Objekte in OpenStreetMap. Siehe auch: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2017-September/008973.html
maxolasersquad (2017-01-30 18:06:39+00:00): This isn't the correct way to mark disc golf. This seems to indicate pathways here, which do not exist. The article on disc golf can be found at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disc_golf
kartler175 (2017-04-03 08:44:41+00:00): Please reconnect highways: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=49.53571%2C-96.68856%3B49.53476%2C-96.69134#map=17/49.53376/-96.69410
Chetan_Gowda (2017-02-09 08:05:15+00:00): Reverted the changes
chnav (2017-01-28 10:37:07+00:00): Пожалуйста ничего не удаляйте, пока не появится достаточно опыта. Здания были нарисованы вполне корректно, достаточно было разделить их на отдельные корпуса и изменить адреса. Тем не менее вы удалили их и нарисовали новые в неправильном месте т.к. рисовать надо по фундаментам, а не крышам.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-02-09 08:02:47+00:00): Reverted the changes
5m4u9 (2017-01-27 08:03:23+00:00): en zonas de parques se debe acercar hasta el máximo, solo así se podría dibujar bien las aceras y zonas de parques.

nunca pegar una zona a una calle, normalmente las calles tiene una separación (la acera) entre ambos.
Mashin (2017-01-28 04:05:11+00:00): Hi potatodragon, I had to delete your paths in Edgerton Park because they were duplicate of already existing ways in that parks.
Warin61 (2017-01-27 21:15:55+00:00): You have removed the road 'Evans Street' totally from the map! 

This is wrong. 

If you want to add footpaths .. then add, don't change a valid object that is there and used to something else.
karitotp (2017-02-07 15:26:27+00:00): Hi jvrjvrjvr!
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. While I was working on this area, I found that you added footway and a lake that not exist in the satellite imagery, so I fixed them.

Regards.
Supaplex (2017-01-27 08:23:14+00:00): So big changeset. What are these ways?
SomeoneElse (2017-02-11 12:51:18+00:00): I've reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45996692 and sent them a message that they have to read before continuing mapping in http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1192 .
user_3216889 (2017-01-27 19:39:02+00:00): Weilanden (waarvan 1 ook ijsbaan) vormen geen park.
Revert toegepast met 45571993.
nevw (2017-01-28 05:48:54+00:00): Your vandalism of the Openstreetmap has been deleted
user_3216889 (2017-01-27 19:35:30+00:00): Een voetbalveld met bomen eromheen is geen park.
Revert toegepast met 45571898.
user_3216889 (2017-01-27 19:48:35+00:00): Zwanemeerbos stond al met naam op de kaart.
Revert toegepast met 45572255.
TheSwavu (2017-01-28 00:05:29+00:00): Hi,

If something is wide enough to drive a two track vehicle down (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392050423 ) it should be a track not a footway:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Thanks.
user_3216889 (2017-01-27 19:53:38+00:00): Zandgat en omgeving stond al goed op de kaart, hoeft niet nogmaals als park.
Revert toegepast met 45543592.
TheSwavu (2017-01-27 21:09:03+00:00): Hi,

This:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53632602

is not a park it's a nature reserve:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=nature reserve

Thanks.
TheSwavu (2017-01-27 21:10:34+00:00): That link should have been:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve
TheSwavu (2017-01-27 20:59:36+00:00): Hi,

The name of this way:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446984502

should be Tuggeranong Creek not Lake Tuggeranong as it represents the creek that runs through the lake:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
oba510 (2017-01-27 11:42:43+00:00): Hi, I looked through your edits and literally every single thing you added was either fictional or otherwise incorrect. I have reverted your changes.  OpenStreetMap is a representation of the real world that people use every day for a variety of purposes, not a fantasy map. Please only add things that exist in the real world. Thanks!
4004 (2020-01-24 13:07:21+00:00): 17го????
BCNorwich (2017-01-31 07:37:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these two POI but the information was already placed on the buildings. Duplicate POI info removed.
Lantian (2017-01-28 15:18:09+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:지도_특징

아파트먼트는 말 그대로 건물을 만드는 거라서 토지 이용지물 주거구역으로 바꿔주셔야 합니다 그 안에 아파트를 넣으시는게 맞습니다.

단지 안 도로는 취부도로 (Service road)로 해 주시는게 원칙입니다.

죽전일대는 도로를 완벽하게 구비를 못 해놔서 주소까지 적으라고 권하지는 못하겠네요 ;;

즐거운 포켓몬고 아니 맵핑하세요
Endres Pelka (2017-01-27 20:09:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Warin61 (2018-11-06 09:09:28+00:00): Hi,

I don't think this is a national cycling network .. but either a regional or a local one.
grimpring (2018-11-06 11:31:38+00:00): Australia does not have a National Cycling Network.
This Rail Trail or Bikeway or Trail is a very popular Adelaide Hills cycling route originally opened by the SA Minister for Transport, Energy and Infrastructure.
One day it may be completed to Mt. Pleasant, mainly along the old rail line.
Warin61 (2018-11-06 21:47:27+00:00): As the Relation: Amy Gillett Track (6915750) only has one member and that member is a route relation (Relation: Amy Gillett Bikeway (3089479)   "alt_name"="Adelaide Hills Amy Gillett Rail Trail") I don't see much point in its existence... 

I think Relation: Amy Gillett Track (6915750) can be deleted without any loss of information. I have remove the network tag from this relation.
mattchn (2017-01-28 01:07:02+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please only add things that exist in reality, I removed these fictional objects here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45579287
mattchn (2017-01-28 01:06:42+00:00): The Target is already on the map as "Super Target", I'll go ahead and remove the duplicate. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167529417
Essin (2017-03-05 10:59:17+00:00): This stuff is not visible on aerial photos, and the path looks very strange. Please don't add nonsense to the map just to test or get better results on Pokémon Go, add real stuff instead!
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-28 00:09:38+00:00): Same here, see http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45545649
FreedSky (2017-02-02 11:39:52+00:00): This is not ruled by the United Nations
FreedSky (2017-02-02 11:50:18+00:00): 还有这个裁定争议太多，你无权根据此裁定修改边界显示。
建议在wikiosm发起南海议题讨论。

There is too much controversy in this ruling, you have no right to modify the border display according to this ruling.
It is recommended that wikiosm initiate the South China Sea issue discussion.
woodennature (2017-02-06 06:15:25+00:00): 收到. 但是如果在该领土上只有一个国家归属，对其他索赔人不公平。 如果在地图上,领土清楚地标记为有争议，那将会更好.

Perhaps it would be more accurate to include the other claimants for the same disputed territory instead of just merely just a single claimant.
Spanholz (2017-01-27 09:30:53+00:00): Hi, 
openstreetmap.org is no playground, the data is used by many users and your changes are immediately visible for all of them.

I reverted your changeset.
woodpeck_repair (2017-01-27 06:59:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45539282, 45539322, 45539569, 45539725, 45539818.
Spanholz (2017-01-27 09:29:54+00:00): Please connect the footways to the streets, when they are crossing. 

Welcome to OSM.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-29 15:22:22+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45550759
Allroads (2017-01-27 13:44:05+00:00): Een bepijlde route bepaald niet de access van de weg.
mueschel (2017-01-30 09:41:39+00:00): Hallo,
diese beiden Tags passsen nicht zum parking:lane-Schema. Kannst du da nochmal nachschauen?
  parking:left:free = *
  parking:right:residents = *
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane

Gruß, Jan
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-28 00:09:21+00:00): Hi thegolgiapparatus, welcome to OSM. I think your edits can't be correct. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45545925
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-28 09:30:38+00:00): #pleasereview
Thomas8122 (2017-01-27 14:29:12+00:00): Warum denn doppelt? Der Umring ist doch schon 6 Jahre da. Vielleicht dort dranhängen.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-28 00:06:16+00:00): Hi Huep84, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind removing many runways of this airport in your changeset? Thanks.
Spanholz (2017-01-27 09:21:06+00:00): Please connect the path to the street and maybe change the type to "path", which is more accurate.
Donalaid (2017-01-27 11:33:47+00:00): With this path, the path actually runs right beside the road and does not permit motor vehicles, especially in certain areas.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 13:40:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4636924204/history has 종류=건물 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Spanholz (2017-01-27 09:18:16+00:00): Hi, 
openstreetmap.org is no playground, the data is used by many users and your changes are immediately visible for all of them.
Please do have a look what the Name tag means and do not add imaginery footways.
gormo (2017-01-27 10:09:36+00:00): Für sowas gibt es access-Tags. Wenn da eine Straße ist, dann sollte sie nach OSM und mit access=private (bzw. halt der korrekten Regelung) gekennzeichnet sein.
gormo (2017-01-27 10:11:05+00:00): OK, wurde von anderen schon wiederhergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45551793
DD1GJ (2017-01-27 10:56:27+00:00): Bei wem oder welcher Firma hat sich die Gemeinde beschwert?
Spanholz (2017-01-27 09:14:02+00:00): Hi, 
openstreetmap.org is no playground, the data is used by many users and your changes are immediately visible for all of them.

I reverted your changes.
nevw (2017-01-28 06:33:47+00:00): Please don't make up names for paths. They only get named if there is a sign or similar with that name.
Jodie Cameron (2017-01-28 23:25:54+00:00): Sorry, this is my first time using the Map,
nevw (2017-01-29 00:10:59+00:00): I also spent a bit of time making up a really good name for things I mapped at the beginning.   :)
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
Sanniu (2017-06-19 18:59:24+00:00): Not connected footpaths are useless for pedestrian routing, can you connect them to surrounding streets where appropriate, as you seems to have local knowledge?
Yaron Giat (2017-06-20 11:59:14+00:00): Hi,
This is a footpath that have a dead end with a pond in the end of it. It doesn't connected to any surrounding streets.
Sanniu (2017-06-20 12:01:59+00:00): Can you map a pond too, for map completeness? :)
And other paths in this park? As I see no path here is connected to the outside world...
geow (2017-01-27 14:00:26+00:00): Hallo StadtplanAH, Objekte werden bei OSM mit Schlüssel=Wert-Paaren beschrieben. Eine Ferienwohnungen wird mit tourism=apartment erfasst, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dapartment

Momentan wird das auf der Hauptkarte (osm-carto) noch nicht als Symbol dargestellt, das wird sich aber künftig vermutlich/hoffentlich bald ändern.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg weiterhin
geow
user_3216889 (2017-01-27 17:39:53+00:00): Is geen park!
Revert toegepast middels 45568327.
Warin61 (2017-01-27 21:35:26+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
You have added names to some of the paths you have added .. where did you get the names from? If these are your own 'names' ... then don't add them to the map, OSM should be used for 'official' or at least 'locally used' names. You can add the tag 'source' to say where these things came from, or add it in the comments section of your change set. 
Enjoy.
Jodie Cameron (2017-01-28 23:29:08+00:00): Where in a small local town so there are no path names so i just named them after what the location is called. If this is incorrect i am sorry, it wasn't my intention. I am new to using thing and was still trying to understand. What should i name the path if there is no name?
Warin61 (2017-01-28 23:45:37+00:00): noname=yes is used to indicate there is no name. If you don't know the name ... just leave the tag off, if you know there is no name then use the noname=yes tag. 
The basic guide is to map what you can see, don't make stuff up. 

The OSMwiki is a fair guide ...
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noname

There is a lot of detail on the OSMwiki ... don't let that confuse you .. just get the basics first. Ok?
Sanniu (2017-07-14 17:56:11+00:00): The paths now useless to pedestrian routing, 'cause they are almost not connected to surrounding. Can you connect them to surrounding streets, where appropriate?
richlv (2017-01-27 10:10:03+00:00): hi there. thank you for your interest in openstreetmap.
 the highway=pedestrian feature, added in this changeset, was not supported by the satellite imagery or by mapillary images and i have removed it.

if it does exist, could you please install the mapillary.com application and take some photos of it ? thanks :)
Peda_repair (2017-01-31 22:55:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
ediyes (2017-01-30 16:48:59+00:00): Hello,

What you edited here?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469369969/history, there are many duplicated streets and your comment doesn't explain well what happened. Please be careful, I fixed now.
Spanholz (2017-01-27 11:35:12+00:00): Hi,

openstreetmap is no playground. Please only add existing stuff to the map. These are not parks. I reverted some of your changes.
Martin Borsje (2017-01-27 20:33:04+00:00): reverted Pokémon vandalism
eggie (2017-04-18 08:42:30+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
Allroads (2017-01-29 17:07:45+00:00): Hier teken je park, dwars over een huis heen volgt niet de contouren, deze huizen zijn uit een database van de overheid, en liggen behoorlijk goed hun plaats, ga hier niet me schuiven.

Leer eerst van je eigen fouten en verbeter ze alvorens je iets anders aan pakt.
Allroads (2017-01-29 18:07:26+00:00): Je tekent ook farmland over een weg heen (track) de weg is geen farmland, dus er moet links en rechts van de weg getekend worden. Naar waarheid tekenen.
Chris Fleming (2017-01-27 10:47:59+00:00): HI - I just wanted to say Welcome to OpenStreetMap, it's always great to see new users joining up and contributing. 

I do have a few small comments. The first is regarding use of landuse=residential - in Edinburgh we tend not to use this. Especially as we roll out more detailed building and garden mapping.

The second is the addition of the waterway=drain under the buildings, just wondering why you were adding this?

We have quite an active local community and regular meetups, see here for details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Edinburgh
sophiemccallum (2017-01-27 17:16:33+00:00): Thanks Chris and thanks Hayden for joining in the mapping. 

Just to let you know I am currently working on systematically updating all of the Carrick Knowe area so within the next week or two all the houses, walls, gardens etc will be mapped and then a detailed survey will be carried out to add all house numbers, amenities and points of interest. 

Cheers,
Sophie
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
BCNorwich (2017-01-27 18:26:47+00:00): Not the proper place to do testing (testing can be done without uploading fiction to the live database). Can I help you with mapping anything.
Your addition has been removed.
Regards
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
mueschel (2017-01-29 14:53:06+00:00): Hi,
could you please explain the edits you made? Most of the keys you used are not defined and used nowhere else:
bibliographicCitation =ISSN 1927-0488 E-ISSN 1927-0496
nameAccordingTo = http://www.tropicos.org/Name/1701853
plot 	PlotLagoas15
references =http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v2n3p115
scientificNameAuthorship =Cav. & Dombey ex F. Delaroche
taxonID =taxonIdLagoaSeca01
taxonRank =species

Also, the "name" tags you used all do not contain the actual name of the object, but just repeat the species tag.
Could you please clean this up?

Jan
naoliv (2017-01-29 18:39:29+00:00): Markus, talvez você queira utilizar as tags corretas para representar as informações?
Por exemplo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:genus e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species e/ou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:taxon
Se precisar de alguma ajuda para isso, basta avisar.
DD1GJ (2017-01-31 07:05:58+00:00): War alles nur fiktiv für Pokémon!

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
nevw (2017-01-28 05:47:17+00:00): Your vandalism of the Openstreetmap has been deleted
mavl (2017-10-14 04:49:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
nevw (2017-01-28 05:46:51+00:00): Your vandalism of the Openstreetmap has been deleted
Rainero (2017-01-29 23:07:51+00:00): Hallo BadBoyBudha,

für diesen Änderungssatz gilt dasselbe wie für den Nr. 45550648. Er wurde als offensichtlicher Pokémon-Edit revertiert.

Vielleicht hast du Lust wirklich existierende Wege, Häuser, etc. einzutragen? Das wäre nützlich und willkommen in OSM.

Servus, 
Rainero
AndersAndersson (2017-01-27 11:48:29+00:00): Hej!
Vad är det du försöker göra?
leisure=park ska det vara om det är en park. Jag är dock tveksam till att det verkligen finns någon park i detta område. Beskriv vad du vill göra så hjälper jag dig.
Rainero (2017-01-29 22:59:44+00:00): Hallo BadBoyBudha,

willkommen bei OSM. Leider hatten Deine Edits genau das Muster von Leuten, die versuchen, Pokémons anzulocken. Das ist bei uns unerwünscht. Bitte trage nur Dinge ein, die der Realität entsprechen! Daher wurde alles wieder zurückgesetzt. Weitere Erklärungen findest du unter https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tipps-fuer-neue-pokemon-go-mapper/?lang=de

Servus,
Rainero
NKA (2017-01-28 09:13:47+00:00): Det er fint at du bidrar i OSM, men dette er en skog, ikke en park. Fint om du endrer tilbake til skog.

Her er noen tips:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-pokemon-go/
Berend1988 (2017-01-30 09:21:29+00:00): I think I changed it back?
NKA (2017-01-30 09:27:46+00:00): Yes, now it is a forest. Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-29 15:22:53+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45545836

thx!
Thomas8122 (2017-01-27 14:34:35+00:00): Bitte im Wiki informieren wofür parking_space benutzt werden soll!
please-delete-this-account (2017-01-28 21:18:45+00:00): Ok, habs korrigert.
johnny_1982 (2017-01-27 16:24:50+00:00): Street classification is obviously wrong. "Trunk" is wrong here. Also segments are NOT connected. Please check documentation about street classification.
geodreieck4711 (2017-01-28 09:23:50+00:00): warum wurde building=yes in area=yes umgetagt?
SK53 (2017-01-27 09:47:50+00:00): OpenStreetMap is used in real life by millions of people. Please dont use it for doodles: only map things which exist. If you're hoping for Pokemon mapping real things works much better.

I've deleted this.
mavl (2017-10-14 04:50:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52915187 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45475262].
Warin61 (2017-01-27 21:27:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

As well as the LPI Imagery there is the LPI Base Map .. that gives you the boundaries for the park - you can use that base map data to make the park into an area .. it looks much better on the map.
aharvey (2017-01-27 22:53:18+00:00): Sorry, I only just saw this note after changing it to an area.
Thomas8122 (2017-01-27 14:39:35+00:00): Das wäre mir neu das hier ein Gebäude steht! Und oben drauf ein Springbrunnen?
please-delete-this-account (2017-01-28 21:22:16+00:00): Brunnen steht tatsächlich einer da. Rest korrigiert.
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:16:57+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
Kruddel (2017-01-27 21:26:47+00:00): Hi, good work on updating The Vale. I'm not sure about it being landuse=park, it doesn't seem quite right, but then again I can't find a better typing... So I guess it works!
It would probably be better as one contiguous area though, rather than lots of little parks divided by the paths? So one big area bounded by EPR, Church Rd & Canal, excluding Maple Bank & Chamberlain? So basically the areas you've already mapped, but combined into one? Then it would have a clear nesting of Uni Land -> Parkland -> Buildings/paths/lake. Thoughts?
AerobIast (2017-02-12 10:49:09+00:00): Hello, the Vale is listed as a registered park.

imgur.com/a/997XL

If you want to merge the parks, I can't stop you... (then it'll be one big nest instead of several small ones... if it ends up as Ekans again...)