piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
smootheFiets (2022-02-03 09:46:57+00:00): Hoi MapMan420,

Wat leuk dat je smoothness toevoegt (naast andere leuke dingen), goed bezig! Ik zie echter dat je een paar keer smoothness=excellent toepast bij surface=paving_stones. Dat is niet per se onmogelijk, maar toch heel ongebruikelijk. Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness/Gallery
Zeker dat je op deze klinkers lekker kunt skeeleren? Op Google Street View (geen toegestane bron voor OSM-edits natuurlijk) oogt de Gedempte Vaart hooguit smoothness=good (liever niet doen op skeelers, op de racefiets OK). De meeste klinkerwegen in onze streek hebben eerder smoothness=intermediate (wel te doen op de racefiets als er geen strakkere plan B is, prima op 37mm-banden).

Zou je nog eens willen kijken? Ik ken Surhuisterveen niet goed genoeg om het meteen zelf aan te passen. Ben er wel een paar keer langs gefietst (vooral voor de Pieter Weening Classic), dus ik weet zo'n beetje waarover ik praat.

Grout'n uut het Westerketier,
smootheFiets
smootheFiets (2022-02-03 09:58:43+00:00): I just noticed locale=en-US in your edit summary... So in case your Dutch is not so hot, let me repeat the above in English (it's easier on me than Dutch, anyway):

I'm very happy to see you adding smoothness tags to a bunch of ways - thumbs up!  That's probably my biggest mapping hobby, and I'm glad to see it picked up by others.  

However, smoothness=excellent in combination with surface=paving_stones strikes me as unusual / incredible.  You've assigned that combo to, e.g., Gedempte Vaart https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182555054
I kinda know the area, see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90465765.  I would've noticed paving stones _that_ good.

excellent means: nice on roller blades.  That's reserved for the finest asphalt / concrete.  It's not unheard of on paving stones, but excessively rare.  
Even 'good' paving stones are moderately rare in our area, where good means: nice on a road bike, OK on roller blades.
Typically, they're intermediate: no-go on roller blades, OK on the road bike, but you'd happily trade them for an alternative smoothness=good route, even at the expense of a moderate detour.

This gallery https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness/Gallery is useful for reference (it's also linked from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness )

Would you care to take a second look and to adjust smoothness as needed?  I'd be very grateful.  Also, I'd be happy to hear any comments you may have.

Greetings from (just) across the Groningen/Fryslân divide ;)
smootheFiets
mcliquid (2022-09-11 13:41:38+00:00): Shouldn't this road be rather a highway=service?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210296927
LauCam (2022-09-11 16:30:05+00:00): This road is designed to bypass a bridge for an exceptional convoy that would be too high. I don't know if "service" is more appropriate than "trunk-link" in this case.
mcliquid (2022-09-11 16:37:36+00:00): Probably yes, I found the error in brouter because it was an unconnected (access=no) piece of highway. But in the meantime I have also marked it as false-positive.
(http://brouter.de/brouter/suspect_manager_help.html)
LauCam (2022-09-11 16:49:38+00:00): It makes sense, I switch it to "service".
who_i_am (2022-01-30 12:41:42+00:00): 龙山公园
eggie (2022-02-01 12:50:43+00:00): Dag vvad. access=no op de openbare weg is bijna altijd fout. Ook op een paaltje.
Beter dus niet doen.
Een motor_voertuig wordt per default al tegengehouden. 
Zo'n paaltje heeft al ingebouwde accesstags.
foot en bicycle=yes is ook al default. Niet taggen.
Wel moped=yes en mofa=yes als die er doormogen, want die zite osm als motorvoertuigen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-01 12:56:00+00:00): access=no heb ik verwijderd
moped en mofa toegevoegd
Het zal niet routeren voor auto's. 

horse=yes is inderdaad wel nuttig, want die tag is wel nodig.
gr eggie
user_12500175 (2022-01-31 13:24:42+00:00): Hallo JeeArAux_79,
die Rettungswache ist schon als Node eingetragen. 
Da das ganze Gebäude nicht extra für die "Funktion" BRK gebaut würde ist das Eintragen über einen Node der richtigere Weg
JeeArAux_79 (2022-01-31 20:44:06+00:00): Im gesamten Gebäude befindet sich nur das BRK und keinerlei andere Unternehmen.
user_12500175 (2022-01-31 21:42:36+00:00): uj gibts das Cafe nicht mehr?

Es gab letztes Jahr in Forum einen Konsens - an das Gebäude/Grundriss nur Eigenschaften zu mappen die das Gebäude betreffen/mit ihm verbunden sind, also z.B Gebäudeart, Adresse, Stockwerke, Dach usw. alles andere z.B Firmen, Geschäfte, Praxen usw .sollten als Node gemappt werden.
Ausnahme ist wenn das Gebäude selber einen Namen hat.
JeeArAux_79 (2022-01-31 22:43:33+00:00): Also im UG ist die Garage für den RTW, im "EG" sind die Schlafräume/Lager der Rettungswache, im 1. OG befindet sich der Aufenthaltsraum/Büro der Rettungswache und im 2. OG sind die Wasserwacht bzw. die BRK Bereitschaft, das "Cafe" auf der anderen Seite steht schon Monate leer
user_12500175 (2022-01-31 23:09:56+00:00): Ah.., bin schon länger nicht mehr vorbeigekommen.
Trotzdem hat das Gebäude ja nicht den Eigennamen "BRK Mering" deshalb gehört das da nicht rein, sonder wie schon geschehen als Node innerhalb des Grundrisses
Glassman (2022-01-30 14:56:22+00:00): #TIP: Adding what type of traffic can pass the bollard would be helpful to routers. I assume bike and pedestrians are okay to pass.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116778402
PeacefulMountain (2022-01-30 21:41:25+00:00): @Glassman, wouldn't the restrictions on the trail itself be enough for routers? You can't get to the bollards without routing onto the trail
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116778402
Glassman (2022-01-30 23:39:58+00:00): It's my understanding that the bollard acts as a blocker to the router so it won't route through it. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard#How_to_Map
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116778402
torstiohneh (2022-01-31 20:51:16+00:00): Dear Willhelm_Mueller, why did yon tag the path as bicycle=no?
First: "Dieser Key dient der Erfassung von Zugangsbeschränkungen für Radfahrer. Er ist nicht dazu gedacht, die Eignung eines Weges für Radfahrer zu erfassen."
Second: I passed it several times with my MTB
Kind regards torstiohneh
torstiohneh (2022-02-03 08:08:53+00:00): Oh sorry my mistake, I saw you only edited the surface.
Kind regards
Willhelm_Mueller (2022-02-03 08:58:14+00:00): Hi  torstiohneh,

i am happy to see that people check the changesets in openstreetmap!

During hiking i reduce my mapping to streetcomplete in order not to bother my relatives ;)

I have to say espacially that route was realy fine. 
Keep on mapping. Thx for double checking the edits 

Willhelm
torstiohneh (2022-02-04 22:18:55+00:00): Hi Wilhelm,
thanks, I am just trying to complete the map in my surrounding area.
You are right, this trail is really fine, I passed it several times with my Mountainbike.
In this case it is annoying that route planners like komoot or bikerouter will ignore this trail.
But fortunately we can change the tagging...
gscholz (2022-02-13 05:28:21+00:00): Hi Ernesto,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.34575&lat=21.37278&zoom=10&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116778892

Can you please fix this? Can you please also learn how to use multipolygons?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

As this changeset has no comment, can you please learn what this is about as well:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
Ars-UA (2022-01-30 14:27:31+00:00): Навигаторы лучше понимают скорость в километрах, может лучше 50 поставить?
Carto_Graph (2022-01-30 15:50:40+00:00): Я оставил maxspeed=50. Поменял только source.
LateNightTone (2022-01-30 14:22:24+00:00): Hi Quainer, I was about to do this but I see you got in ahead of me ;-)

Just a note to say the new stretch of motorway over ST08 should follow the alignement of the more easterly "construction" way (immediately adjacent to the bit you made into a functioning motorway). The bit you've converted is actually the opposite side of the ST08 bridge, which will eventually become a northbound carriageway, but isn't yet opened. Do you mind if I swap these over? Or if the above makes sense, feel free to update yourself. 

Just to avoid potential confusion/duplication of ways in the long run :-)

Tony
Quainer (2022-01-30 15:35:26+00:00): Ha ha.
I see what you mean there, I took that road as being the entire bridge (I assumed it that may eventually be made northbound or something) and the one further east as the bridge that was still under construction, my bad...
Quainer (2022-01-30 15:40:42+00:00): Although, as I look at it now I'm not sure how best to do it. would it be easier to draw a new road rather then change the tags of those closed roads? work away at it if you want..
LateNightTone (2022-01-30 15:48:09+00:00): I'll pop in and take a look - I think it may require a slight reshape of the roundabout (which in essence has happened on the ground with the new alignment anyway), but I'd generally go for reusing the ways that are presewnt so that OSM retains the history since its inception. Give me a few minutes :-)
LateNightTone (2022-01-30 16:10:28+00:00): Ok, that's me done. I see what you mean about the future northbound stretch - I can't remember if there's still another bridge to be built for that too, but I do know from February they'll be using the western half of ST08 for northbound traffic anyway, so it may as well be sitting ready for that changeover for the time being. I marked the old sections of Glanmire Bypass as abandoned too, I expect they'll be demolishing them before too long.
Quainer (2022-01-30 17:09:30+00:00): cool, always great to see the map being updated so quick!
Ars-UA (2022-01-30 14:34:22+00:00): С access=private будут проблемы, я переделал через запреты поворотов.
Map-Peter (2022-01-30 16:52:57+00:00): Hallo legofahrrad,
 
warum entfernst du hier "tunnel=yes" und "layer=-1" ? Woher soll OSM nun wissen was oben und was unten ist?
 
Gruß Peter
legofahrrad (2022-01-30 17:22:59+00:00): Moin!
layer=-1 war doch offensichtlich falsch, da die Straße hier nicht weiter unten verläuft wie sonst irgendwo. Deshalb nun auch "tunnel=building_passage" (Die Straße verläuft durch das Gebäude).
Bei dieser Art von Tunnel (building_passage) sind nun die Ebenen egal, da OSM nun erkennt, dass die Straße auf normaler Höhe durch das Gebäude verläuft.
Schönen Abend noch! :-)
Map-Peter (2022-01-30 17:26:29+00:00): Oh, liest sich wie eine Neuerung. Wenn ja, ist diese bei mir bis eben noch nicht angekommen. 
 
Gruß Peter
bresomch (2022-03-08 23:20:36+00:00): Das ist im eigentlichen Sinn kein Theater, auch wenn es eine Bühne hat, wo man Theater spielen kann.
bresomch (2022-03-10 00:08:44+00:00): Ich denke, amenity=community_centre
community_centre=cultural_centre
würde hier besser passen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
user_2066394 (2022-01-30 16:10:14+00:00): An sich war der schon da?
opendcc (2022-02-01 09:18:55+00:00): Ich bitte auch die Regeln zum Nametagging zu beachten.
Glenn Plas (2022-01-30 19:47:12+00:00): Hallo Jozin,
I see you're an ID user, it must be a lot of work doing this in ID.  And we have a tool that can help you to merge/create houses easily but it uses JOSM as a way to import buildings.  The empty area's you did here can be done in 5 minutes with it.  In cases you're interested, we hang out at https://app.element.io/?#/room/#osmbe-grb:matrix.org

Als, check out https://buildings.osm.be for the tool, before using it, drop by in our channel so we can assist.

Thanks for contributing!
jozin-belgium (2022-02-21 09:00:26+00:00): Hallo Glenn,
Ik heb dat al uitgeprobeerd en ik vind dat een heel gedoe. Ik heb een andere tool gekregen van Pieter VDV, mapcomplete.osm.be/grb : dat gaat heel goed om  gebouwen op OSM te plaatsen (die er nog niet op staan).
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-02 20:55:23+00:00): Lanes that are not physically separated should not be mapped as separate ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116780327
Patr1k_P (2022-02-02 15:35:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61371523


ahoj, adresy by mali spravne vyzerat takto:

addr:city=Trenčín
addr:conscriptionnumber=2643
addr:housenumber=2643/29
addr:street=Puškinova
addr:streetnumber=29
addr:suburb=Trenčín

...cize chyba tam city, suburb a doplnit housenumber....vies si skontrolovat tu

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13188333?pos=48.882906,18.027229,16
gscholz (2022-01-31 05:47:06+00:00): Hi Ernesto,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.15486&lat=21.18243&zoom=11&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116780387

Can you please fix this? I propose to learn how to use multipolygon relations:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind Regards
Guido
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
mavl (2022-02-03 15:30:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
archie (2022-01-30 14:02:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk
Jrachi (2023-08-10 08:22:25+00:00): Il codice/ref di un percorso non è il nome del sentiero.
Cancello il tag
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
Niiepce (2022-01-31 21:02:22+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier wohl ausversehen eine Linie ohne Tags erstellt. Möglicherweise wollest du den kleinen Wegabschnitt zwischen den Häusern mappen. Ich habe den Fehler korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
Niiepce
mavl (2022-02-03 15:30:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
legofahrrad (2022-03-12 13:46:51+00:00): Hallo, kannst du mir erklären, was das hier für ein Gebäude ist?
Null Etagen, aber 52 m hoch?
Der Name "Verkaufsautomat" scheint mir auch beschreibend zu sein und kein Eigenname. Für Verkaufsautomaten gibt es "amenity=vending_machine" zusammen mit "vending=*"

Schau dir doch bitte nochmal ein parr Wiki-Artikel an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine

Viele Grüße
muzirian (2022-07-31 10:17:29+00:00): ദുരിതാശ്വാസകേന്ദ്രം റോഡ് 1 you added here is wrong, please cross check data before adding
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
lyctkel (2022-06-27 07:55:18+00:00): Cześć syntex,
Obecnie badam niektóre rzadko używane znaczniki building=*.
W trakcie tego procesu znalazłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231635269, 231635270 i 231635281, które używają building=tennis_court.
Ten znacznik jest rzadko używany.
Z mojego punktu widzenia lepiej pasowałyby poniższe znaczniki:
 sport=tenis
 leisure=sports_hall
 building=sports_hall
 building:levels=1
Szczegółowe informacje można znaleźć na stronie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_hall.
Jeśli masz pytania, skontaktuj się ze mną.
Z poważaniem,
lyctkel
----
Hi syntex,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231635269, 231635270 and 231635281 which uses building=tennis_court.
This tag is used rarely.
From my point of view the foillowing tags would  would fit better:
 sport=tennis
 leisure=sports_hall
 building=sports_hall
 building:levels=1
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_hall for details.
If you have questions, please feel free to contact me.
Regards,
lyctkel
syntex (2022-07-05 18:05:40+00:00): ok
lyctkel (2022-07-05 19:11:27+00:00): Thank you!
syntex (2023-11-02 17:35:10+00:00): To osiedle jest niepoprawnie dodane, ścieżki są dodane krzywo i nie zgadzają się z ortofotomapą
syntex (2023-11-02 17:38:33+00:00): Aj sory, chyba wykonawca wykonał ścieżki osiedlowe niezgodnie z dokumentacją
whb (2022-03-10 12:16:20+00:00): Eine private Teeküche ist kein Küchenstudio (plant und verkauft Küchen und Küchenmöbel), Merkmal entfernt.
Äußerst unglaubwürdig, dass dort jeder üblicherweise Duschen darf, permissive -> private.
Bitte auch dringend die Zugangsberechtigungen der Toiletten prüfen!
mavl (2022-02-03 15:30:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
Magoo (2022-01-30 19:44:48+00:00): no road marking for this road crossing
mariotomo (2022-01-30 16:00:29+00:00): hi. may I hint you at providing better comments to your changesets? you mention "roads", but you're mapping water bodies. may I also hint you at consulting the wiki for the tags to use? these you added here aren't "lagoon".
mavl (2022-02-03 15:30:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
canfe (2022-01-30 15:55:18+00:00): Vorrei sapere come hai ricavato l'altezza del sottopasso.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-30 20:56:53+00:00): This user is now blocked by the DWG.
Questo utente è ora bloccato dal DWG.
See:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5634
Dodko (2022-02-21 10:06:22+00:00): Nie je potrebné dávať značku
oneway=no
keď nie je predpoklad, že to môže byť jednosmerka.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:oneway
Značka oneway=no se používá k potvrzení, že (část) silnice NENÍ jednosměrná. (Používá se k předcházení chybám v mapování v oblastech, kde jsou časté jednosměrky, nebo k přepsání výchozích hodnot.)
Ancymon (2022-01-30 18:13:03+00:00): OpenStreetMap to nie jest miejsce na wandalizmy, zmiany wycofane. Prosimy o nie dodawanie fikcyjnych nazw obiektów.
arukuni (2022-01-31 11:12:28+00:00): Z wandalizmem zapraszamy na Google Maps - tam jest mile widziany ;)
Carto'Cité (2022-08-17 11:11:16+00:00): Bonjour Dazeilad,
J'ai vu que tu avais ajouté des bandes cyclables sur la Rue du Rabais (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15925700 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086930104). Je n'ai pas trouvé d'information qui le confirme et j'ai un doute (surtout pour cette portion https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15925700). Est-ce que tu pourrais me confirmer que tu l'as observé sur le terrain ? J'ai vu que cette route avait bien une bande et un shared-lane par contre : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026104277 et je me dis qu'il y a peut-être eu confusion.
Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Dazeilad (2022-08-17 16:53:20+00:00): Effectivement, il n'y en a pas dans la rue du Rabais. J'ai fait cette contribution à partir de StreetComplete, j'ai dû mal comprendre la rue qu'il m'indiquait... Bien vu ! J'ai corrigé.
Carto'Cité (2022-08-17 17:55:18+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ton retour :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
user_5359 (2022-01-31 15:46:11+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
Feature = farm structure
in-use = no
bxl-forever (2022-02-05 17:04:56+00:00): Hello,

building=apartments here, seriously?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260451453

It looks like a shed at the back of a private garden.
Carto'Cité (2022-07-11 12:20:23+00:00): Bonjour Pascal,

C'est encore moi :)

Je me permets de te contacter sur ce changeset pour savoir ce qui te motive à ajouter bicycle=designated et foot=designated sur ces chemins : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429667053
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103248856
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103248864
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87433163
Je n'ai rien vu qui permettait selon moi de le décrire ainsi mais je passe peut-être à côté de modifications récentes. Là, avec ces tags, ces chemins sont comparables à des Voies Vertes mais de ce que je vois (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=243296857679129
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=314106903860757
il s'agit d'un chemin assez générique sur lequel le droit d'accès aux cyclistes est suffisant et déjà assuré par le fait qu'il s'agit d'un highway=path.

Je me permets également de préciser une estimation de la largeur à 1 m car le chemin semble relativement étroit (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=424041679162726).

Je me permets aussi de préciser sur ces chemins une information qui est assez importante sur les aménagements partagés, c'est le segregated=yes/no. Il influence beaucoup de chose en termes d'interprétation des types d'aménagements.

Voilà, j'espère surtout que mes questions et mes remarques ne t'importunent pas trop :) et surtout si tu as la moindre question ou remarque n'hésite pas à nous contacter.

À bientôt.

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
*Martin* (2022-02-02 20:34:13+00:00): Prosim pridavaj zmysluplnejsie popisy zmien ako len "pridanie" a "uprava". Vid. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].