piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Cambroulet (2024-04-03 23:21:22+00:00): Dziękuję za zauważenie i naprawienie mojego błędu. Teraz widzę swój błąd. Jeśli już, to powinienem był oznaczyć budynek jako layer=1, zamiast oznaczać linię kolejową jako layer=-1. Przepraszam za kłopot.
maro21 (2024-04-04 23:26:43+00:00): Nie ma sprawy, nie musisz przepraszać za błędy.
W tym przypadku to lepiej byłoby oznaczyć budynek tagiem layer=1. Tak jak robimy z building=roof np. na stacjach benzynowych. To pewnie jakaś hala, do której mogą wjeżdżać pojazdy szynowe.

Są też inne możlwości naprawienia przecięcia budynku z torem kolejowym. Np. pociąć tor i złączyć z budynkiem. Albo rozciąć, złączyć i dać covered=yes lub tunnel=building_passage, podobnie jak się robi z drogami.

Póki co dałem layer=1 na budynki (bo one są nad torami, a tory leżą na ziemi).
Chris Fleming (2022-10-25 17:19:38+00:00): I'm not sure if the deletion of the trees here makes sense, you might be able to convince me of the change to natural=scrub  - but I am curious why?
ticki_52 (2022-10-26 15:39:15+00:00): Hi Chris, thanks for your message. The vegetation on Calton Hill is mostly "natural=grassland" or "natural=scrub". The latter consisting of shrubs and inextricable creepers. Occasionly ou will find a few small trees among the shrubs, but anyway this area is far from being "wood". Therefore I changed the tagging from "natural=wood" strewn with "natural=tree"-tags (which are redundant in my opinion) to "natural=scrub" to reflect the current situation on Calton Hill. If you have a look at the vegetation on Corstorphine Hill for example. This is typical "natural=wood". Convinced?
Glassman (2022-10-23 00:14:12+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q".  

Also - in the editor, the background layer may have more recent imagery of the area. For example Maxar Premium imagery is more current but still missing a number of the houses. You can also use King County imagery. Let me know if you need help adding it to the editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127857970
bxl-forever (2022-10-21 17:56:31+00:00): Hello,

Nice change.
However, the changeset title says something completely different.  If your titles are auto-generated, I suggest rewriting them before uploading. ;-)
Binnette (2022-11-03 16:10:14+00:00): Hello. Thank for your message. Yes I have this "bad?" habit to start solving a challenge on https://maproulette.org and then edit the whole area... So I started to fix the issue with the Dead Ended way... and then I completely do the map around the area...
I will try to add more info in changeset title next time...
kechan (2022-10-20 22:47:31+00:00): 1000th edit on this account lol
Frans S (2022-10-21 13:33:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Global Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Important. Stay within the task square you are assigned to. Other task squares can be opened and mapped by other mappers. It causes duplications when you map on those as well.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
In general the mappings of buildings are fair, however mostly not squared. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
 Overlapping objects drawn. A water basin crosses buildings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127858053
Frans S (2022-10-21 13:16:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Global  Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
 About highways:

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127858091
Frans S (2022-10-21 13:17:25+00:00): btw. mapping of landuse is not a part of this project. 
Please stay within the project requirements.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127858091
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-23 23:58:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127976279 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional edits.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10600391 and previously https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3351 .
Frans S (2022-10-21 13:10:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
They are that bad mapped that we have to remove these mappings because it cost more time to adjust them rather than map them all over again.


How to improve your mapping skills.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127858122
Frans S (2022-10-21 13:07:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines.
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127858127
Frans S (2022-10-21 13:05:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.

* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
* Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127858285
Frans S (2022-10-21 13:01:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.

* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127858309
Frans S (2022-10-21 12:58:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not rather accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127858330
seattlefyi (2022-10-20 23:21:21+00:00): Hi again, just checking in. Just to let you know, it might take a while (sometimes an hour, sometimes longer, like days) for features to show up on the map tiles after edits. The tire shop is in there now, I've removed all the duplicates, no need to add another.
seattlefyi (2022-10-20 23:27:38+00:00): Also, the "opening_hours" tag describes the hours a place is actually open (otherwise considered closed), so in the Nothing But Bundt cake case, should be: Mo-Fr 10:00-19:00. (No need to indicate Sunday off). If you like, you can try using the tool at (https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/) and then paste the results you get into the field in the editor.
seattlefyi (2022-10-20 23:31:51+00:00): I'll send you a note which you can reply to if you have more questions.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 02:33:28+00:00): Hello,
Please do not add fictional features to OSM!
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 03:10:33+00:00): These were mapped as cemetery sectors, which is the correct way to display them. They are not grass landuse even if they have grass as a surface.
Palolo (2023-02-02 15:33:45+00:00): Please note that the Africa Highway Tagging guide calls for highway=path, not footway.
geogidon (2023-02-02 15:37:45+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out, Palolo!
wireguy (2022-10-22 12:37:06+00:00): RJS, can you relook at this change, because it broke the relations:
relation 14716282
relation 14716283
and the protected area Mohonk Mountain House
way 1105656908
way 235869355
AlwaysRJS (2022-10-23 11:33:39+00:00): I road that area on a bicycle on a clear day Fri Oct 20, 2022 with a good GPS device and corrected the exiting track which was way off. If I changed something else by accident please correct that but leave the track change I made in place because it is accurate. Thank you.
gpserror (2022-10-24 06:37:26+00:00): Hi, welcome and thanks for adding new roads!
I've been looking at routing errors and noticed that the new road drawn at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105658502 overlaps https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766818209 and it's not clear to me which one I'd be driving on if I were driving east to west.  It's probably Prismo Lane, but if you know which for sure, it'd be great if you could update this, thanks!
archpdx (2022-10-21 01:41:50+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note that the name tag isn't used for descriptions, see https://wiki.osm.org/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions. I would use roof:colour instead to denote the color of the shelter (https://wiki.osm.org/Key:roof:colour)
Frans S (2022-10-21 12:57:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. Your mappings are rather accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards, however they are mostly not squared.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127859033
Frans S (2022-10-21 12:54:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped accurate, however, please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127859052
Mashin (2022-10-21 09:23:40+00:00): Hi Frank,
thanks for contributing.
Yeah the building shape doesn't reflect the reality. But in iD editor you can switch background imagery (press B) to "MetroCOG othoimagery 2019" and draw it more precisely.
Cheers
MxxCon (2022-10-21 19:30:45+00:00): Hello.
Please note, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part "building:part=yes" way must always be within "building=yes" polygon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127859241
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 01:57:41+00:00): Welcome back to OSM. Please take your time as you edit - you have duplicated a number of features that were already on the map, and a lot of the other features you added were very inaccurate.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-23 18:07:48+00:00): why you deleted https://osmcha.org/changesets/127859350/ Balnearios Santa Fe area?
RICARDOG8 (2022-10-23 19:27:58+00:00): Cuz now they are building a new neighborhood there.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-23 19:36:44+00:00): thank you
Dawid2849 (2022-10-31 23:15:45+00:00): Dobra robota!
Taya_S (2022-10-21 03:17:44+00:00): Why were the non-intermittend water areas removed in this changeset?
eggie (2022-10-21 07:04:24+00:00): reverted by changeset #127866339


Beste Padvinder
Esri world is outdated.. 
Laatste edit was 8-1-22 ! Waarom geen communicatie met de voorlaatste mapper?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-21 07:05:56+00:00): typo laatste edit 8-10 -22
Dat is recent.. Let svp op de data van de laatste edits of neem even contact op met de voorlaatste mapper voordat je iets verwijderd van de kaart.
MVG
eggie
padvinder (2022-10-24 14:20:28+00:00): Sorry! Ik gebruikte onlangs afgeleide kaart (wanderreitkarte) en zag wat vreemds: midden in plassen water schijnbaar eilanden (blank) waar in werkeleikheid geen eiland. Bij check tagging leek er water in water getagt. Dacht dat dit de oorzaak was en haalde binnenste water weg. Ik zag over het hoofd dat groter water 'intermittant' was. Probleem ligt dus bij wanderreitkarte, dat hier blijkbaar niet mee overweg kan, niet bij het taggen van Thiskal.
eggie (2022-10-24 14:28:32+00:00): Ahh.. zo... maar had de wanderreitkarte dan al een update gehad.. want de edits zijn hier heel recent.. maar ik zal zo even kijken in welke outer mp dat water als inner ligt.. want het intermittent gedeelte is expres als transparant gemapt...
Dit even van mn mobiel.

Bedankt voor je reactie.
Eggie
eggie (2022-10-24 14:42:53+00:00): Even de Openfietsmap gekeken.. Die maakt van alles water.. Ook van intermittent.. dat even terzijde..  


Dat 'echte' water zit als inner in de outer van de intermittent. .. maar eigenlijk als je voor het effect gaat van soms heide/ soms water (het randje er om heen)  zou het binnenste water beter in de outer mp van de heide zelf kunnen worden toegevoegd.
Omdat je water altijd ziet maakt het voor het effect niet uit, maar op e.o.a. manier kan de Wanderreit er niet mee omgaan.

Maar up to Thiskal om het aan te passen.
Het is al een beetje gekunsteld gemapt voor het effect, maar thiscal wil voorkomen dat je van die witte rendering krijgt bij intermittend.

Het zou ook opgelost kunnen worden door natural=heath toe te voegen aan die intermittents en die dan ook op te nemen in de grote outer natural=heath..

Een lastige en op het randje van taggen voor de renderer.
Maar zelf zou ik het ook zo doen. .. die intermittents als transparant mappen. 

Anders een vraagje voor het forum. 
gr eggie
eggie (2022-10-24 15:10:55+00:00): ... maar dar gaat dus niet, want natural wordt al 'bezet'  door water...  
Zou het gewoon zo laten.  :)
Taya_S (2022-10-24 15:35:44+00:00): Zal straks als ik tijd heb even kijken hoe ik een bug report bij wanderreitkarte kan maken. Lijkt me namelijk een rendering bug.
Taya_S (2022-10-24 16:27:24+00:00): Heb een mailtje met een bug report hun kant op gestuurd. Nu nog wachten op een reactie.
MxxCon (2022-10-21 19:41:32+00:00): You can use https://jmapb.github.io/nycaabs/ to search for an address or building id from nycdoitt:bin tag and pull up nyc's official documents about that building to find its height, number of units, date built, etc. very useful to fill in missing details 👍🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127859755
Supaplex (2022-10-21 01:52:31+00:00): 重複添加了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379886774
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127859870
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 18:02:23+00:00): reverted
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 18:06:29+00:00): stop editing fake places like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105665277 it's not a park, and it does not have this format.
Joseph R P (2022-12-08 00:47:47+00:00): Thank you for all these landuse additions! However, it appears that you've added parks on top of other parks, such as with Accotink Stream Valley Park (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105666194) and Lake Accotink Park (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104420830). You may want to check some of these landuse additions and remove the duplicate park layers as it seems like some nature reserve boundaries, such as those for Accotink Stream Valley Park, are having trouble rendering.
whammo (2022-12-08 11:34:13+00:00): Yeah thanks for flagging, I guess the JOSM validator doesn't catch overlapping leisure ways like it does landuse and natural ones. I'll clean this up, and sorry for the trouble.
GinaroZ (2022-10-21 09:52:04+00:00): Hi, what was the reason for changing the A772 to a living street?
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 02:21:20+00:00): Hello, it looks like you have this area partially over houses at the top. Also, I can't find any information about an Angel Mounds National Park. Do you mean Angel Mounds State Historic Site which is to the South?
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 02:06:15+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM!

Thanks for your contributions!

The park you added was already on the map as an area, so I will remove the new node you created.

You can find the park area, here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23737129
impiaaa (2022-10-21 15:36:17+00:00): For a changeset with a large bounding box, it would be helpful to have a more descriptive changeset message (like, "updated opening hours"), or to split up the change into smaller areas.
EMIdent (2022-10-21 03:00:31+00:00): Please check alignment.
marc__marc (2026-02-20 13:13:11+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9704493979
what's the name of the gust house ?
is SOLEDAD a person ?
it's a religous or was a religious operator or the person from whom the name comes cathodic?
Is it a campsite for deaf people?
The English and French translations make me think that part of what is in the name is not the actual name of the campsite but a description of the person from whom the name comes or the operator.
Regards,
Marc
MikeN (2022-10-21 14:30:44+00:00): Hi, Thank you for the city boundary update!   The change looks good because I didn't see any shared boundaries.   The old boundary relation and ways can be removed.   It is generally better to edit objects rather than remove-replace, especially boundaries with shared edges.   For those cases the "Replace Geometry" function would apply to each revised way, possibly after un-snapping old boundaries from roads, etc, then making sure they reconnect or share other existing boundaries.
shinylman (2022-10-21 23:47:17+00:00): Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.
mavl (2022-10-21 14:45:22+00:00): Здравствуйте, теги access=permissive нужно было заодно удалить.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
thanosparavantis (2022-10-21 09:43:36+00:00): Hey, I'm Thanos from Athens. Is there any way I can reach out to you? I'm adding buildings in Voula area, just like your contributions.
Ghoja (2022-10-21 04:11:24+00:00): Adicionado: Edifício Madeiras
mavl (2022-10-21 06:13:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок неправильно меняет статус дороги. Это обычная улица, а не шоссе. Этот и другие ваши пакеты правок будут отменены.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
mavl (2022-10-21 13:31:32+00:00): Теги access=permissive не нужны на обычных улицах.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
adreamy (2023-08-08 04:53:23+00:00): 활발한 매핑에 감사를 드립니다.
공원(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Tag:leisure%3Dpark)은 레저, 휴식을 위해 마련한 곳으로, 녹지(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Tag:landuse%3Dgreenery)와는 구분해 주시면 고맙겠습니다.
아울러 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:Good_changeset_comments 도 참고해 주시면 고맙겠습니다.
Adhil@123 (2022-10-21 04:44:41+00:00): major issue.. dont connect landuse with other entities(many nodes are connected with others)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127862059
BPTT (2022-10-21 04:30:18+00:00): I would argue Polonia and Lincoln village should be bordered by the River between S 6th and S 16th Sts - rather than by either Harrison Ave or Cleveland Ave. The UWM Neighborhoods LibGuide is often cited as the authority for Milwaukee's OSM neighborhoods, but the map at the guide has recently and inconsistently changed Polonia and Lincoln Village's boundary from Harrison (old map: https://earth.google.com/web/@42.99606111,-87.91526669,189.90673105a,1216.99742754d,30.00001232y,359.25790656h,0t,0r/data=OgMKATA) to Cleveland (new map: https://guides.library.uwm.edu/c.php?g=56373&p=7831880). The Kinnickinnic River makes the most sense because of how few crossings there are. Furthermore, it's absurd that Baran Park would not include the area of S 3rd & Harrison; in no way is it connected to Bay View. UWM's boundaries were not drawn with care, and the River makes the most logical sense.