piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheOldMiner (2015-10-17 11:11:58+00:00): There would be thousands upon thousands of places where the tag should be used.  I was quite surprised when you said it was uncommon.  I will see if I can find a couple of spots in google street views as a example
TheOldMiner (2015-10-17 11:16:43+00:00):  21° 6'1.28"S 149° 9'49.64"E

There should be a sign that says "road subject to flooding" - This is a typical floodway found throughout Queensland.  For 99% of the year, it has no water crossing it.
GerdP (2015-10-17 11:20:00+00:00): I see attribute flooded=* and floodable=*
in taginfo. I guess the latter is good here?
TheOldMiner (2015-10-17 11:25:25+00:00): When considered in a local context as a term well known with local residents, the term "ford" would be misleading.  I have certainly used the term ford, when I have had to cross an unformed creek, in 4WD praying that I wont get stuck
TheOldMiner (2015-10-18 03:42:48+00:00): Been thinking about your comments.  It would be beneficial to change the tag to ford with an attribute of floodable.  Do you know if there is a simple way to locate all tags highway=floodway and change the details
GerdP (2015-10-18 07:08:35+00:00): okay very easy:
visit taginfo.openstreetmap.org/
click on highway in the squre titled "keys",
select the tab "values" and enter floodway
in the search field. You will only find one 
place, that's why I contacted you.
When you click on the word floodline
you can continue with the buttons in the upper right corner. The one for "overpass turbo" leads you to a great tool for this
kind of query, you can also go to 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/
directly and click on "Wizard" .
GerdP (2015-10-18 07:11:34+00:00): forgot to say: if you enter only partial
search values in taginfo, it might show you
typos as well, e.g. "flood" will find all
values containing the word "flood"
TheOldMiner (2015-10-18 07:26:43+00:00): I found the offending changeset.  I have changed it to a bridge (to render as causeway) with an attribute of flood_prone=yes.
Having crossed the actually causeway, this would be the best solution.  It is my intention to eventually place the riverbanks of the rive
Constable (2018-02-18 09:07:42+00:00): ciao, per favore dai un'occhiata a questa nota https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1303153 , scrivo a te perché sei stato tu (anni fa) ad aggiungere il nome. Io almeno a breve non ho modo di controllare di persona cosa dica il cartello stradale, e allo stesso tempo non mi fido ciecamente di una nota anonima.
Grazie, ciao!
fmondini (2018-02-19 07:30:40+00:00): Ciao. Ho verificato di persona, ma tutti i cartelli dichiarano un semplice "Via V. Gioberti". Però, scavando un po', in effetti ha ragione l'utente: il nome corretto è "Vincenzo Gioberti". Procedo alla correzione, grazie della nota.
Constable (2018-02-19 08:21:46+00:00): efficientissimo, grazie!
Endres Pelka (2015-07-04 12:31:21+00:00): Jest ustalona składnia dla opening_hours? Jest!!! To się jej trzymaj!
smiszym (2015-07-04 12:59:39+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagę (nie wiedziałem o składni, teraz sprawdziłem na wiki), lecz nie rozumiem, dlaczego Pan usunął również pozostałe tagi. Czy jest jakiś powód?
Endres Pelka (2015-07-04 15:39:19+00:00): Przepraszam za trochę niewyparzony język, ale pisałem już do któregoś kolejnego z rzędu "psującego", można się nieźle wnerwić. Usunąłem, bo nie byłem pewien czy ten fryzjer jeszcze tam jest - edycja sprzed 11 miesięcy. Teraz, jak odpowiedziałeś, sprawa jest jasna. Już dodaję z powrotem.
GerdP (2015-11-13 16:41:18+00:00): please review:
what is meant with way=firewall ?
Maybe
man_made=cutline ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcutline
In Bing the way looks more like a normal 
highway=track now.
Agustin (2015-11-13 19:00:07+00:00): Well, it's not, believed me.
GerdP (2015-11-14 00:05:56+00:00): okay, I just wondered because way=firewall is only use here .
SomeoneElse (2017-09-22 23:57:58+00:00): I'm guessing that some of the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/60263383/history should perhaps be adjacent rather than on the crossing?
M!dgard (2015-04-28 19:14:38+00:00): Hallo, ik vroeg me af hoe je weet dat de maximumsnelheid voor de treinen op spoor XII 120 km/u is. Het lijkt me eigenlijk redelijk raar dat de treinen zo snel voorbij de perrons mogen rijden. Is dit misschien een foutje?
Eimai (2015-04-28 19:24:51+00:00): Ik ben treinbestuurder, dat spoor is 120 km/u, maar in de praktijk zie je dat natuurlijk nooit omdat alle treinen er stoppen. Overigens kan het gerust sneller hoor, 160 door Leuven bijvoorbeeld (en daar gaat het effectief ook tegen die snelheid).
M!dgard (2015-04-28 21:36:35+00:00): Cool :)
Is spoor XI dan ook 120? Ik heb het vandaag zo goed en zo kwaad ik kon opnieuw getekend; het nieuwe spoor is al enkele weken in gebruik (zoals je allicht al weet). De ref en zo ervan ken ik wel niet.
Eimai (2015-04-29 00:01:13+00:00): spoor 11 is nog steeds 40 zoals de rest van Sint-Pieters, en ik dacht ook niet dat dat 120 ging worden, slechts 90. Spoor 10 zou 120 worden als de doorgaande hoofdsporen van lijn 50A, en al de andere sporen 90. Maar dat is dan allemaal pas voor als het klaar is, binnen vele jaren... Als ik tijd heb zal ik het nog eens bekijken in OSM, want er is alweer heel wat veranderd sinds ik de laatste keer de zaken daar heb geüpdatet, maar het is ook een zeer moeilijke werf om alles te volgen...
user_3022894 (2018-08-14 18:59:15+00:00): Hello Sander H,
in my area (Wuppertal, Germany) there are many substation-objects which have been edited by you back then on whose the power=substation-tag has not been set back to power=sub_station (by this changeset). Maybe something went wrong here? Or may I kindly ask what do you mean with "largely reverting"? Not everything reverted as it seems to me. But I see, this changeset is nearly four years old now. Probably not worth a discussion because many objects got further edited in this time...
Greetings, Lukas
Sander H (2018-08-15 16:20:02+00:00): Found some discussion with another user explaining that objects that already had a substation tag were excluded, so probably double tagging of the objects affected, but don't know exactly.
user_3022894 (2018-08-15 20:23:01+00:00): Ah, okay. Thanks for your answer, at first. And this might be, yes. But (at least in my area) the objects didn't have those as it seems to me, but okay, I also do not have any, let's call it, proposal or solution what we should do now, except just letting the things how they are now...
The most important thing about this is that after back then, you know more about "mechanical edits"... And I think you do :)
anderfo (2015-03-03 10:52:59+00:00): Hei,
jeg ser at du satte class:bicycle:mtb=1 på lysløypa ned til Hauken/Haukvatnet-parkeringa. Var dette bevisst (er det en spesielt fin sykkelsti), eller var det egentlig mtb:scale=1 (dvs vanskelighetsgrad 1, blå) du ønsket å markere?

Ref. http://mtbmap.no/#16/63.3957/10.3164

-Anders
Tor Hovland (2015-03-04 20:11:29+00:00): Hei, Anders!

Det var bevisst, ja. Ikkje fordi det er ein så fantastisk sti, men fordi det er eit preferert alternativ framfor for eksempel å trille ned Vådanvegen. Veldige fine stiar kan vi godt markere med 2 eller 3. Og så burde kartstilane visuelt skilt mellom desse på ein god måte.

"1" = Prefer
"2" = Very Nice way to cycle
"3" = This way is so nice, it pays out to make a detour also if this means taking
many unsuitable ways to get here. Outstanding for its intended usage class.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Class:bicycle

Av same grunn har eg også markert stien nedover mot Breidablikk:

http://mtbmap.no/#16/63.4146/10.3550
Hjart (2015-08-21 11:39:56+00:00): No path/road should ever overlap another path/road. In case of a signed route/MTB route or similar a route relation http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routes should be used. See example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630640
Retired Account (2015-05-27 13:53:15+00:00): This changeset removes the subway line labels attached to the station name. While this is probably the "right" way to tag the stations, it is not consistent with how the other subway stations are tagged in NYC. Do you intend to change all stations or make the few station edits consistent with the other subway stations?
Allroads (2017-03-05 00:21:50+00:00): Wil je de building tag niet van het gebouw halen.
Dit is lastig bij het controleren van BAG gebouwen. En er staat geen gebouw op de kaart.
althio (2019-07-29 08:34:54+00:00): Bonjour David Crochet,

Un responsable local de la ville de Moustoir-Ac nous signale :
"je constate des implantations sauvages tel que le sentier, Au Fil des Pierres, qui n'existe pas réellement".

Il y a peu d'informations de source et commentaires sur ce changeset, et il a maintenant 5 ans, c'est donc difficile de se faire une idée.

As-tu des souvenirs ou d'autres informations à propos de ces tracés de randonnée et sentiers ?
David Crochet (2019-07-29 09:27:00+00:00): Hum, bonnes questions. Je ne me souviens plus d'où provient ce nom de chemin
David Crochet (2019-07-29 09:33:00+00:00): LA seul chose que je trouve est que cet ensemble de chemins fait partie du chemin de randonnée "Au Fil De L'Eau "
Linkid (2019-04-23 11:38:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir changé le type de passage (avenue → rue) ? Pour moi, ça reste la prolongation de l'avenue, non ?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-01-05 15:10:35+00:00): non è perchè entra a Gardaland è una primaria!
aceman444 (2015-05-17 20:39:51+00:00): Hi, what does oneway:bicycle=permissive mean on way 298288939 and way 209710954? It seems to be a worldwide unique tag. Did you mean =no ?
mavl (2016-09-22 02:39:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Недавно адрес, который вы добавили, был заменен с «Ульяновск, Промышленная улица, 74» на «Ульяновск, Промышленная улица, 78». Это правильная замена?  
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105694312/history]
eggie (2017-09-09 17:35:41+00:00): PB met opnieuw welkom gestuurd
dieterdreist (2017-04-21 20:58:30+00:00): This changeset set narrow footways to pedestrian, which aren't actually roads for pedestrians but true footways
Art Penteur (2015-01-19 20:52:00+00:00): Le nœud 3022395244 (
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3022395244 ) est un bureau de poste dont le nom est entièrement en majuscule.
Cela est contraire à l'usage d'écriture des noms de lieux dans OSM (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Toponymes,_odonymes#Majuscules.2C_minuscules_et_trait_d.27union ) , où à l'IGN (http://education.ign.fr/sites/all/files/charte_toponymie_ign.pdf, section 4.9.1)

D'ailleurs ces bureaux de poste sont proposés à l'intégration via Osmose pour qu'un utilisateur humain puisse faire des contrôles et correction.
Dans l'avenir, merci de penser à corriger le champ "name" des bureaux de poste.

Merci.
meihou (2015-01-20 12:54:21+00:00): D'accord. Je corrigerai ça et je je corrigerai le nom dans mes futurs imports.
Merçi pour le conseil.
d1g (2015-12-08 19:06:35+00:00): лишние теги поправил http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35832264
RicoElectrico (2017-06-01 13:08:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298370707

To tagowanie pod render linii na boisku jest chyba trochę niezgodne ze sztuką...
YomanNH (2025-07-08 06:07:03+00:00): Oczywiście, że jest. Szkoda, że nie poprawiłeś tego 8 lat temu, tylko wisiało tyle czasu takie dziadostwo...
mkbdc (2025-07-08 16:02:48+00:00): Odpisujesz na komentarz z przed 8 lat :). Popraw chłopaku.
YomanNH (2025-07-08 16:06:29+00:00): Już poprawione, chłopaku. Sprawdź, zanim skomentujesz.
DaveF (2022-06-15 17:05:14+00:00): Hi
A while ago, but could you clarify what this object is?
Seems too far away from the tracks to be a railway platform.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-23 09:42:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3023473668/history had KH=RR 250 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?

Later this node was moved to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9606389308/history - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118923538
PlaneMad (2016-09-14 15:08:59+00:00): Jaisen, was trying to convert the village boundaries to relations and noticed that the panchayat boundaries don't neatly align with the ward boundaries: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/iow

Is this expected?
jaisuvyas (2016-09-14 15:50:31+00:00): Yes, I know that. And we came to know about it, soon after the mapping party exercise. Panchayat boundaries are not correct, along the unsurveyed / partially surveyed tracts of western ghat in Kerala. And I have initiated a move to solve it (for the Koorachundu village panchayat), consulting with the revenue department, and with the department of survey and land records. This process involves the movement of files through several bureaucratic tiers and takes a lot of time in each tier. :( If this process is finished successfully, then only we can have a clear idea, where the actual boundary of the panchayat run through. Alignment of the ward boundaries can be neatly done after this process, I think. Hope we can solve it in the near future.
PlaneMad (2016-09-15 04:22:35+00:00): Make sense. But it looks like the ward boundaries are close to accurate? If so can we start converting them into relations?
jaisuvyas (2016-09-15 07:24:05+00:00): Inner limits of ward boundaries are close to accurate. But outer limits are unlikely. The volunteers who mapped the area couldn't go through dense forest areas and through difficult hilly terrains (areas surrounding the village panchayat). When I prepared the hard copy map, I had to manually adjust the boundaries. I think, better we wait until we get the accurate boundary. I was on leave from service for last six months, so couldn't follow up with the revenue department. Now I rejoined, and following up with them. Hopefully we will get the finalised cadastral map too, along with. Best.
PlaneMad (2016-09-15 09:24:55+00:00): An interesting case study into the state of management of land revenue :)
*Martin* (2014-11-03 14:19:06+00:00): Tá lesná cesta sa isto nevola "Lesná cesta". Do atrubútu "názov" sa dáva vždy len vlastné meno, nie všeobecné meno. Ale pozerám, že už to bolo opravené iným používateľom.
Nakaner (2024-08-26 07:40:50+00:00): Hallo,

das von dir erfasste Frauenhaus ist indirekt Gegenstand einer Diskussion im OSM-Forum. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/frauenhauser-mappen-ein-unding-oder-otg/117914

Viele Grüße

Michael
eggie (2017-11-05 07:10:26+00:00): opnieuw ....Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
dgitto (2017-05-29 13:59:14+00:00): Come mai abbrevi(asti) anche i toponimi che in precedenza tu stesso avevi denominato per esteso? Le abbreviazioni in OSM sarebbero da evitare
Laska (2017-05-29 14:09:08+00:00): Perché nella mia fonte era indicato (ad esempio) "C. Cestonaro" e dopo aver indicato "Contrà Cestonaro" mi era venuto il dubbio, fondato, che la toponomastica corretta fosse "Casa Cestonaro" o "Case Cestonaro" (meno probabile "Ca' Cestonaro"). Se tu sai con certezza da qualche fonte la toponomastica corretta, ben venga. Correggi pure. Ciao
dgitto (2017-05-29 14:18:44+00:00): See buonanotte :-). Sono lontano io. Ok scusami, ma capirai era strano che lo stesso utente mettesse e poi togliesse. Speriamo in qualcun altro della zona o ricerche
*Martin* (2015-03-18 21:47:28+00:00): Ahoj Poťo

Prečo je toto za "multipolygon" a preco ma nazov "Bratislava" ked obsahuje 3 dediny a ani jedna z nich nie je  BA?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3962939

Z mojho pohladu ta relacia nema vyznam a urcite by som ju vymazal.

Prosim oprav to. Dakujem.
Peter Potisk (2015-03-23 15:25:19+00:00): Bola snaha aby som pripojil tieto polygóny k polygónu mesta Bratislava. Len som to ešte nezrealizoval.
David Crochet (2016-09-06 10:44:00+00:00): Le parc ne pouvant pas s'appeler "privé", est-il possible d'y indiquer son nom. Le statut privé sera définis par les restrictions d'accès via les chemins conduisant à ce parc
kreuzschnabel (2019-07-26 13:49:13+00:00): Cześć Zmianowy, z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176068917 oznaczyłeś ścieżkę jako power = minor_line. To nie ma sensu - ludzie nie mogą chodzić po linii energetycznej, która (poprawnie) nie jest połączona z żadnymi drogami ani ścieżkami. Proszę to sprawdzić.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-26 11:27:14+00:00): Dzięki za zmapowanie, przydało się na mapie podczas wycieczki z siostrą na Kudłoń.

Przy okazji: wszystkiego najlepszego na święta i nowy rok, miłego mapowania!
ndmystko (2023-12-27 08:56:48+00:00): Udanych wycieczek w Nowym Roku :-)
czubi (2020-05-10 09:59:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298574537#map=19/50.91535/11.04066&layers=N
kannst dich noch erinnern was da war?
_torsten_ (2020-05-10 14:30:20+00:00): Nö, weiß ich nicht mehr. Ich hab´s jetzt nach Luftbild mal auf meadow geändert.
syntex (2021-04-23 15:25:33+00:00): Dawnych? Czyli już nie są podmokłe?
Endres Pelka (2015-09-18 17:01:48+00:00): Co to jest?
Hjart (2015-02-09 11:48:46+00:00): På de nye GDS billeder ser bygningen noget anderledes ud
AE35 (2015-02-09 15:28:52+00:00): Har rettet bygning til nu.

Tak for at gøre opmærksom på dette
Hedaja (2015-10-08 10:12:29+00:00): Hallo, ich habe gerade den offenen Note hier gesehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/335718
Ich kann dem eigentlich nur zustimmen. Für  die Zelte wäre building=tent richtig.
Für Tiere scheint es noch keinen weit verbreiteten tag zu geben, aber animal= wäre da wohl passend. Küche und Co wäre wohl gut in discription= aufgehoben. 
Es wäre klasse, wenn du es gleich selber korrigieren könntest (eventuell die Zelte gleich mit richtig rund machen)

Notfalls kann ich das auch übernehmen.

Mfg Christian
tyr_asd (2017-02-18 16:48:46+00:00): Was macht denn ein area=no auf einem multipolygon?? http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2927323
ToniE (2017-02-18 17:51:55+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, da ist was falsch gelaufen. Hab's korrigiert.
Gruß
Toni
tyr_asd (2017-02-18 18:25:05+00:00): Danke. Jetzt haben wir dort aber verschachtelte inner-Members (z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122035716 in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122035686). Ist auch nicht ganz korrekt…
ToniE (2017-02-19 20:14:03+00:00): Hmm, ja stimmt. Ich schau's mit malim Laufe der Woche an. Ich habe auch  Bezirkssportanlagen gemapped, da könnte ich abkupfern ...

Gruß
Toni
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-29 16:45:32+00:00): zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1978835 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-29 16:45:55+00:00): I skąd są te nazwy ulic? Bo nie z ortofotomapy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-06 12:24:59+00:00): Skąd nazwa Ujastek na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298624000/history ?
eggie (2021-08-01 16:44:45+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
findftp (2021-08-01 17:08:25+00:00): Hey Eggie,

Bedankt!

Top dat open streetmap. Ik gebruik het overal voor.

Groet,
Michiel
Endres Pelka (2015-05-05 20:38:29+00:00): Było building=yes, dlaczego to usuwasz? Poprawiam.
lxbarth (2015-05-13 06:57:53+00:00): Hey there - how else do people get into this parking lot? right now there is only a one way leading out of the parking lot, but not a single way leading into it.
ma-rt-in (2020-02-22 11:24:48+00:00): Hello,
why did you name the border lines? The border lines are usually not named and do not need a name. The name can and will be created by the border relations.
many greetings
Verdy_p (2020-02-22 14:32:36+00:00): 1. Rivers are named (Le Rhin, La Lauter, La Vielle Lauter, La Moselle) and dual named in tow languages when they are on the border. This is usual.


2. International borders are also named for visibility and clear distinction in the editor, even if these names are not rendered. This also helps mixing different tagging systems between countries and avoid confusion in editors. These names are not necessarily translated in many languages, jsut a few for interest of editors in local languages or reviewers.

Note: this changeset was more than 5 years ago ! It was needed at that time because there were mixes of boundaries by confusing borders for different countries (they first were broken creating a hole, and then the wronf borders were selected to "fix" the hole incorrectly, with that confusion!)... Another proof that these names are needed for editors even, if they are not rendered.
ma-rt-in (2020-02-22 14:39:52+00:00): Re 1: Rivers are named, but not the border. Although a river can be a border, the border does not actually bear the name of the river.

Re 2: If the editor can't get it on the chain to display border relations correctly for the editor, then it's the editor's problem and you don't have to fix it artificially with the data. JOSM, as a highly recommended editor in relation to relations, does not need this artificiality. Just by specifying admin_level you can see what the limit is. 

I would therefore remove the designation, which contains only the designation of the countries concerned here.
Verdy_p (2020-02-22 14:46:39+00:00): Final note: we absolutelty need the names for rivers, espacially those on international borders, because their official name change or depend on the side (the same is true for street names). You cannot take the names from their parent waterway or street relations: the relation name is not rendered locally on map but used only when searching a full river or street by one of its local names.

International boundaries require specific tagging to limit damages by unaware contributers that forget to manage relations on the other side, and ways international borders are used in many relations that are frequently broken and can be difficult to restore. The names make things more obvious for those that want to split/jpoin these ways (and are warned they could break the relations), and for those that will repair them without ambiguity. It takes time to search and identify what belongs to were and it is much longer to repair than to break these in a single click.
Verdy_p (2020-02-22 14:49:10+00:00): As well, relations for countries are not exactly divisions: they overlap in some cases (for disputed areas). Identifying these overlaps is not evident (including the overlap between Luxembourg and Germany along the Moselle River, by a condominium, but German districts including parts of the condominium !)
ma-rt-in (2020-02-22 14:51:08+00:00): The best way to illustrate this is to give an example of what I consider to be a very superfluous term: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541060219
Verdy_p (2020-02-22 15:13:07+00:00): This is not superfluous, and you give an example modified recently for another purpose in France by another editor; These names are not so easy to derive from relations, in fact what is given is the fact it is an international boundary (at admin level 2) and the two countries are named consistantly (there's no need to give names for higher levels: Länder/régions, départements, arrondissements/(Land)kreise, municipalities... because they are obviously part of the lower level).
Names for relations and names for ways serve different purposes. Renderers may want to display the local name of a way or the global name of a relation, this depends on how maps (or custom reports) are made and their intent.

There's no general rule to derive local names from multiple global names set in a parent relation, you cannot infer that easily and the same is true for other inference in the reverse direction from local to more global (espacially for countries where there are many exceptions with shared or disputed areas and different "official legal" sources with different level of precision (and lack of official conflation between their definitions).
Hb- (2025-08-08 17:20:46+00:00): Bist Du sicher, dass dieser Graben https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298684056 und die benachbarten von der Seeve weg fließen?
GerdP (2015-10-25 08:42:09+00:00): please review:
I've changed three nodes from
highway=bump to traffic_calming=bump
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34854989
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-06 18:38:43+00:00): Czy już wiesz, że podkład Bing trzeba kalibrować przed narysowaniem czegokowiek?