piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Art Penteur (2015-01-19 20:56:27+00:00): Le nœud 3264481046 (
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3264481046 ) est un bureau de poste dont le nom est entièrement en majuscule.
Cela est contraire à l'usage d'écriture des noms de lieux dans OSM (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Toponymes,_odonymes#Majuscules.2C_minuscules_et_trait_d.27union ) , où à l'IGN (http://education.ign.fr/sites/all/files/charte_toponymie_ign.pdf, section 4.9.1)

D'ailleurs ces bureaux de poste sont proposés à l'intégration via Osmose pour qu'un utilisateur humain puisse faire des contrôles et correction.
Dans l'avenir, merci de penser à corriger le champ "name" des bureaux de poste.
Jojo4u (2015-01-02 12:09:59+00:00): Hallo t2425b, ich habe einige Änderungen wieder rückgängig gemacht, schau's dir an:
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=27860482
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=27860773
Jojo4u (2015-01-02 12:11:42+00:00): (Erklärung in den Changesetkommentaren)
Hier noch ein Link zu den Abrissplänen: http://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/inhalt.verkehrsplanung-im-stuttgarter-norden-abriss-der-rampe-rueckt-in-weite-ferne.8661e3f6-3dff-4542-b193-38e7957f4fb0.html
AgusQui (2015-05-16 00:40:10+00:00): Esta avenida cambió de nombre hace bastante, se llama Monseñor Antonio Bentivenga
Leonardo Daniel Leidi (2015-05-16 01:13:32+00:00): Pero en los nuevos carteles que puso la Municipalidad de Tres de Febrero hace poco, volvieron al nombre de Juan B. Justo. ¿Vivís por ahí?
AgusQui (2015-05-16 01:36:10+00:00): Me estás jodiendo, se me hace que fue un error, estos municipios pedorros suelen cometerlos, habrá que investigar.
Soy de Moreno, pero cada tanto paso por ahí.
eggie (2018-11-27 20:53:40+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
CloCkWeRX (2016-10-13 14:48:15+00:00): Is this complete? Strava GPS traces suggest it is.
There are also Strava user error reports:
Temos um circuito muito bom neste local e não podemos marcar como rota. Aguardo ajuda.
Ronnie Nys (2016-10-13 21:05:38+00:00): The Google satellite images are very recent (2016) and show that these new roads are already in use. When zooming in on the following link you can see the details.

https://www.google.be/maps/@-12.7086332,-38.3050097,1191m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=nl
CloCkWeRX (2016-10-14 01:11:14+00:00): Thanks, I've updated it based on the GPS traces
maning (2015-12-24 04:27:49+00:00): Hi, d1754. Your edits of Magalona Municipal Hall http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3264615752 referred to Google Earth as a source. Unfortunately, we cannot use Google Earth in OSM. Please revert your version of this road. Thank you. See also: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/2
maning (2015-12-24 04:28:31+00:00): Hi, d1754. Your edits of Magalona Public Market http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3264616485 referred to Google Earth as a source. Unfortunately, we cannot use Google Earth in OSM. Please revert your version of this road. Thank you. See also: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/2
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-02 05:15:20+00:00): Don't forget to connect the ramp to I-10 so it can be used. ;)
TheDutchMan13 (2015-01-02 05:27:38+00:00): I tried but the I-10 north isn't rendering in the editors.
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-02 05:42:12+00:00): Now connected in Changeset: 27855344. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27855344
SomeoneElse (2015-01-04 08:12:51+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM server, even in the middle of the Atlantic.  If you want to test things, use http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org instead.
TheDutchMan13 (2015-01-03 05:39:54+00:00): Thanks!
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-03 05:57:30+00:00): No problem man!
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-02 16:23:05+00:00): Hallo Thoschi. Weißt du vielleicht noch, was du bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3264835612 vor hattest?!
Thoschi (2017-10-03 19:40:50+00:00): Hi, diesen blöden Happy-Copy-Fehler...es sollte ele:nn sein. Habs berichtigt.
JohnDoe23 (2015-01-03 02:06:12+00:00): Hallo, die Eigenschaften an dieser Straße erscheinen mir falsch. Auf den Luftbildern ist klar zu sehen, dass Anwohner die Straße befahren dürfen, was durch das motor_vehicle=no als Attribut an der Straße allerdings ausgeschlossen wird. 

Es gibt ein Tool, mit dem man sich Straßenrestriktionen zusammenklicken kann [1], das erleichtert die Erfassung.

Was mir noch aufgefallen ist, dass du ein paar Feldwege mit einem pauschalen allgemeiner Zugang = Nein eingetragen hast und diese pauschale Restriktion dann wieder teilweise aufgehoben hast. Besser wäre es, direkt die Restriktion einzutragen, z.B. motorisierte Fahrzeuge = nein anstatt Allgemein = nein, zu Fuß = ja, Fahrräder = ja, Pferde = ja. Das ist etabliert und man vergisst dann auch nicht, erlaubte Fortbewegungsarten wieder „freizugeben“, nachdem man diese zuerst pauschal verboten hat. Dieses Tagging führt dann auch nicht zu einer irreführenden Darstellung auf der Karte (rot strichlierte Feldwege) wie z.B. hier momentan zu sehen ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/48.83146/13.40436

Wenn du Fragen hast, immer her damit :) Gruß

[1] http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
scheisserluser (2015-01-03 08:29:54+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis, hab das nochmal korrigiert. Das von Dir empfohlene Tool habe ich getestet und es vereinfacht die Sache schon sehr. Schönen Gruß
XAN_ua (2015-03-20 13:13:11+00:00): Hello! What does this route means - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/154327 ?
dudka (2015-03-20 13:54:22+00:00): XAN_ua, 
this seems to be E581 road corrupted by "OSMF Redaction Account" three years ago.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/154327/history http://map.fosm.org/browse/relation/154327
XAN_ua (2015-03-20 20:46:40+00:00): Ok, so I fixed the relation and adedd it to OSM wiki (e-routes mapping project page).
XaMi (2015-01-22 21:19:04+00:00): Warum hast Du den Namen "Hammfeld Nord" entfernt (way 260765945)? An der Kreuzung Hammer Landstraße / Schanzenstraße ist das genau so ausgeschildert.
Übrigens: oneway=no wird im allgemeinen nicht erfasst. Und der Poller existierte auch schon (node 3252305339).
Geodata01 (2015-01-02 14:19:07+00:00): Street number, number of floors
Nakaner (2016-03-28 22:56:14+00:00): Ich dachte 50 Hertz betreibt Stromleitungen. Betreiben die auch Notruftelefone? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2951561086
Smiljan_02 (2016-03-29 10:48:48+00:00): Die Stromnetzbetreiber bieten in Thüringen über ihr Glasfasernetz (meist Glasfaser im Kern des Null-Leiters) so einiges an, ganze Landstriche werden darüber mit DSL versorgt. Du hast allerdings recht, das ist nur das Netz von 50 Hertz, der eigentliche bundesweite Betreiber der Notrufsäulen an Autobahnen ist der Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft (GDV) , die haben den Vertag wohl bis 2019.
Nakaner (2016-03-29 10:59:25+00:00): Danke, dann habe ich wieder was gelernt.
GerdP (2015-10-26 20:08:34+00:00): please review way 176772112 (IDPL):
You have removed the landuse=industrial tag, later it was changed to a highway
with weired tags:
highway=highway
horse=24h
oneway=3ways
by other mappers. 
What is correct here?
Weide (2015-01-02 12:27:27+00:00): Kommentarfehler: Soll: ref in route_ref geändert
SomeoneElse (2015-01-04 13:07:05+00:00): This changeset has a huge bounding box and a relatively meaningless changeset comment ("Fixed road data").  If this comes up in the changeset history for someone, how will they know what has been changed locally to them and why?
shravan91 (2015-01-06 08:34:35+00:00): Thank You for throwing a light on this issue. I will look into it.
maxolasersquad (2015-01-31 16:34:58+00:00): This has really caused a lot of problems with the roads in Saint Marks, FL US. There are now lots of roads on top of roads, with roads extending out beyond where they actually belong, overlapping existing roads.
shravan91 (2015-02-02 09:36:15+00:00): Thanks for reporting, I reviewed the changeset and fixed all overlapping roads.
herrgray (2015-01-02 13:45:45+00:00): closed
cadsauxk (2015-01-06 21:03:11+00:00): Esta edição precisou ser revertida.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27965744
Procure editar preservando informações anteriores, por exemplo movendo o nome antigo para old_name ao invés de simplesmente apagar.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-03 22:11:28+00:00): Something odd seems to have happened to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4902282/history - it's been deleted.  It overlapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4902133 (which has very odd tags, and probably needs a proper survey to see what it is), but the tags that were on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4902282/history aren't duplicated.
Polarbear (2015-10-25 12:51:10+00:00): I have seen the deprecated gaelic_football coming mostly from Potlatch and iD users. It there an outdated preset in Potlatch?
Dakon (2015-08-03 08:34:27+00:00): Du hast an einigen Stellen "ref=km xxx" an die Bahnstrecke getaggt. Meinst du damit die Hektometertafeln der Bahn? Falls ja, darf ich das entsprechend umtaggen?
biker@gf (2015-08-03 11:18:29+00:00): Klar. Kannst Du machen...
Dakon (2015-08-03 11:31:01+00:00): Danke, habe ich mal umgestellt.
Nakaner (2015-02-14 14:41:46+00:00): Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Wenn man "Rechtwinklisierung" googelt, erhält man nur drei Ergebnisse, eines davon ist dieser Changeset. :-)
woodpeck (2015-01-02 16:46:51+00:00): Please do not make any such mechanical/global edits without first discussing them in the appropriate place. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy for background.
DemoLogin (2019-06-23 20:30:34+00:00): You should have used "subject:wikipedia" instead.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1122239382
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:subject:wikipedia
user_2066394 (2022-06-01 18:09:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121314974
acsd (2015-01-03 12:59:52+00:00): нафига все неправильно переделывать?
kladi (2015-01-02 16:05:05+00:00): sorry, falsche Beschreibung übernommen aus gestriger Änderung.

Hier Änderung der Beschaffenheit (Asphalt) und damit für Radfahrer gut geeignet.
dee_ksha (2019-07-18 10:11:21+00:00): Hi Bernhard Hiller,

Trust you are well, while working on Langkawi we came across "way 303648377", which are marked as unclassified wherein it needs to be changed to residential.Please look into this share your thoughts.

Thanks in advance.
Bernhard Hiller (2019-07-18 12:56:36+00:00): According to current imagery, this road leads thru the country side from Jn Makam Mahsuri south wards to a small village. Hence it is NOT a residential.
If you want to discuss the tagging scheme, you may use the forum at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=60
zors1843 (2015-01-03 06:22:15+00:00): What is this untagged way supposed to represent ?
Carl S (2015-01-02 17:45:33+00:00): This object may have originally been imported from bad TIGER data from Census Bureau.  Not even sure how this contributes to the Census Bureau's work, but appears to have been a bad read from aerial photography.
Mirecnet (2015-01-05 20:45:27+00:00): Nazdar,
ten utes na Cebrati nieje dobre otagovany. Je to rozsadlina a nie utes.
Treba to dat prec, alebo to opravit. Nech si to navzajom neprepisujeme. 
Dik
Andreeeee (2015-02-25 16:32:18+00:00): Cus. Pozeram ze si to uz zmazal (necital som emaily) ;) Je mi celkom jedno ako je to otagovane, ale bol by som rad keby si to tam bud dokreslil, alebo to revertnul. Nech uz sa to zakresli akokolvek, je dobre aby to tam bolo poznacene, IMO.
Andreeeee (2015-02-25 16:38:41+00:00): Aha, uz to vidim, je to tam ako gully... fajn. Skoda len ze sa to nerenderuje na hlavnej stranke :(
Mirecnet (2015-03-10 15:49:53+00:00): Lebo ty si tam nakreslil skalny zraz a ten to nieje. Je to rozsadlina. To, ze sa to na mape nevykresluje je druha vec. Ale v buducnosti sa moze... a ja nechcem, aby boli potom v mape nezmysly....
woodpeck (2015-01-10 21:09:19+00:00): This is a rather large-scale mechanical edit. Has it been discussed before it was executed? Otherwise I'd ask you to please revert it and secure a community consensus before you run it again.
gileri (2015-01-10 23:38:59+00:00): Is there any problem regarding the data corrected by this changeset ? I am welcome to any suggestion or remark to better OSM data, if anyone have any.
yxoc (2015-01-12 18:38:28+00:00): Hello,

You have changed in Montrouge the contact:* keys of some shops in addr:*. This is a problem since the adresses are now duplicated (there are already adress nodes
for the buildings), as you can see easily on osmose. Had you looked into the history of these nodes you would have seen that I had previously changed the addr:* into contact:* precisely for that reason.

Voir aussi http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_France/WikiProject_Base_Adresses_Nationale_Ouverte_%28BANO%29#cite_ref-1
gileri (2015-01-12 19:17:23+00:00): Ralf: If I get you right you mean you used an seemingly redundant, almost-unused tag, with only one reference in the wiki to input addresses which are already present on the surrounding building, in order to avoid errors on tools like osmose ?

The reason osmose didn't flag the way this feature has been mapped is because the tag is not know to osmose.

I'm not sure it's the correct approach for grouping features under the same (address-wise) roof.

Anyway thanks for your input on this changeset.
woodpeck (2015-01-12 19:20:33+00:00): Reverted in changeset 28095080. Any future similar edits must adhere to the existing mechanical edit policy.
gileri (2015-01-12 19:41:28+00:00): By reading the MEP wiki page, I'm not sure my edit falls under it. As stated on the "search-and-replace" section, changesets such as this one, as the data I modified is backed by the wiki, and the data on the features itselves.

So, as you deleted my work, may I ask you to tell me (whether here or in private) what qualify "similar edits", in order to avoid wasting contributors time in the future ? As all contributors, my time is limited and I think I deserve, as much as anyone, that my volunteer work "stay on the map".

Thank you.
yxoc (2015-01-12 20:03:19+00:00): gileri: I am not sure either that the contact:* scheme is the best way to map multiple POI's under the same address, but it is the one which is recommended here in France. Anyway, there seems to be a consensus that duplicated addresses (with addr:* keys) wrong.

-Ralf.
bkr (2016-10-09 18:17:50+00:00): bist du dir sicher dass das in tempelhof alles kreuzungen sind? zb https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/28096694/history

ich vermute es ist keine quelle (deshalb änder ich es nicht), aber laut den "angaben fürs streckenbuch" http://fahrweg.dbnetze.com/fahrweg-de/nutzungsbedingungen/regelwerke/angstrebu.html sind das alles kreuzungsweichen... (der plan dort stimmt aber inzwischen eh nich mehr, deshalb ka...)
ForstEK (2019-04-01 20:04:35+00:00): Guten Abend! Sie haben es (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242094140) als Kühlturm bemerkt, aber es ist überhaupt nicht der Fall, es ist eher wie ein Kühler (Chiller) als ein Turm. Es ist ratsam, dies zu beheben, so wird es genauer sein. man_made=chiller: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dchiller
redrace (2019-04-02 07:10:31+00:00): HUHU
Da ist 4 Jahr her. Da gab es, glaube ich,  den man_made=chiller noch gar nicht.
Jetzt gibts ihn und dich ändere das ab! 
Schöne Grüße
ForstEK (2019-04-02 20:44:19+00:00): Vielen Dank!
KnMoon (2015-01-02 17:54:20+00:00): 註：本來打算連同特搜大隊的三個分隊消防局也一起完成，但是西屯分隊與國光分隊遇上了一點難題。
yellowsoar (2015-01-06 20:19:10+00:00): 抱歉，relation並不是這樣用的，請參照OSM Wiki說明：
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
KnMoon (2015-01-07 00:45:48+00:00): 我有參閱過說明文，可能我誤會了relation:type=site的用法？
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site
我以為像這樣把同一機關的辦公室及服務據點分層串聯起來會比較好（尤其臺中巿政府縣巿合併後有多個分散的市政大樓），真可惜。
等晚上回來我會將relation清除掉。
yellowsoar (2015-01-07 03:48:56+00:00): 消防局各大隊所屬分隊間的關係是從組織架構軟體層面去看的，OSM紀錄的是硬體的東西，如果水湳分隊有一棟辦公大樓、隔一條街有兩棟宿舍、兩間停車庫、一個廣場、一個露天停車場、一座籃球場，那這些物件才應該要以relation去標示他們都屬於水湳分隊。再舉個例子，台中市政府陽明大樓，應該包含大樓本體、後方停車場、兩側花園、前方廣場。
Jojo4u (2015-01-29 16:13:37+00:00): Hallo Chachi1234,
schön dass du bei OSM mitmachst :)
Aber deine Benamungen von Autobahnen sind meines Erachtens nicht korrekt. Ich habe dazu einen Forenthread aufgemacht. Kommt hier Zustimmung würde ich dich bitten die Namen wieder zu entfernen.

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=481455#p481455
cadsauxk (2015-01-05 22:53:36+00:00): Você apagou uma ponte de pedestre aqui, a sua intenção era esta mesma?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230102989/history
ryebread (2016-06-03 03:01:13+00:00): What kind of barriers are these? I see that the barrier=yes nodes are added to the administrative border, not the roads themselves, so it is unclear how the routing will work for these.
tunnelbauer (2015-01-02 20:07:32+00:00): Name ok - Location falsch - eine Kreuzung weiter Richtung Freilassing (habe ich verschoben und dort die alte Bank Austria gelöscht)
tunnelbauer (2015-01-02 20:04:21+00:00): That's wrong - the highway=service is on a different level. I deleted the connection.
hendrik-17 (2015-01-02 19:08:57+00:00): Der Wert "power=yes" scheint mir kein wirklich sinnvoller Wert zu sein. Vielleicht meinst du power=line in Verbindung mit line=busbar für Sammelschienen (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:line%3Dbusbar#Busbar)? Jedenfalls scheinen mir das, soweit ich das auf den Bing-Luftbildern beurteilen kann, welche zu sein.
hendrik-17 (2015-01-02 19:15:16+00:00): Oh, wie ich gerade gesehen habe, bietet iD diesen Wert (power=yes meine ich) wohl so an. Merkwürdig.
Falls das jetzt mehr Fragen für dich aufwirft, als es beantwortet, helfe ich gerne weiter.
hendrik-17 (2015-01-31 20:08:46+00:00): Ich habe das jetzt auch hier mal in power=line und line=busbar geändert.
hendrik-17 (2015-01-02 19:38:12+00:00): Hier das selbe wie bei Änderungssatz #27870784 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27870784).
Getagt wäre das dann wohl ungefähr so wie bei dem gelöschten Weg (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177942737/history), also power=line und line=busbar.
hendrik-17 (2015-01-31 20:00:11+00:00): Ich habe das jetzt mal so gemacht.
treestryder (2015-01-02 20:07:08+00:00): Why would this minor change appear, in the history, to affect a large portion of the world?
choess (2015-01-02 22:50:16+00:00): Because I changed several "bridge:type=suspension" to "bridge:structure=suspension". For some reason, the Platt Bridge had been incorrectly tagged as a suspension bridge, so I also retagged that.
Hjart (2015-01-03 20:36:10+00:00): Hej
Jeg udfører et meget stort antal fejlrettelser, primært på vejnettet og dette er meget lettere når områdepolygoner (inkl. parkeringspladser) holdes adskilt fra vejnettet. Derfor vil jeg bede dig om fremover at gøre dette.
Wulf4096 (2015-01-25 22:03:26+00:00): Goebenstraße/Eppendorfer Weg?? Bitte korrigieren.
Abendstund (2015-01-25 22:47:52+00:00): sorry. fehler gefixed.
tbsprs (2015-01-03 16:22:00+00:00): Thank you for the edit. Can you please update the completion status in the Wiki?
Aaron Lidman (2015-01-29 16:57:14+00:00): Test. Do you get a notification? An email, anything?
SomeoneElse (2015-01-03 22:46:24+00:00): Hi - just wanted to check that the lane tags on the Sheffield end of the Parkway are correct (it's been ages since I've driven up there but they look like that might be wrong).  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278094012/history looks like it's been deleted as part of a merge and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243324912 now extends past https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320118300/history where the road splits.  In both cases the "turn:lanes" tag is "through|through|slight_right".  That seems to make sense up to the junction but not after it?
SomeoneElse (2015-01-18 15:42:22+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320118334 is presumably not a residential road called "proposed"?  What I suspect it probably is is a "highway=proposed; proposed=residential".
Spanholz (2017-04-13 09:04:00+00:00): Hi Vlad,

on the Fort Antoine 1er (http://osm.org/go/xXYlhE~DJ--?layers=N&m=)is the last remaining landuse=farm in Morocco. You said source=survey in your changeset, maybe you can change this small area as you have local knowledge. 

Have fun mapping! 

Spanholz
FredrikLindseth (2017-11-07 14:59:42+00:00): Jeg la merke til nå at alle husene her hadde husnummeret sitt som navn. Det er ikke meningen med name=*. 

Jeg lagde et notat på det her - http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1198462
cadsauxk (2015-01-06 20:46:18+00:00): Deleção da via 125913917 conferida, OK.
cadsauxk (2015-01-05 22:48:58+00:00): Could you please be more descriptive? "Review" doesn't say very much.
artarts (2015-01-06 00:14:35+00:00): My bad.
When I saw my city missing so many streets I spent many hours completing it, got very tired and didn't pay much attention for the comment.
cadsauxk (2015-01-06 00:22:17+00:00): Quando vi "Review" pensei ser alguém do exterior. Uma descrição sempre ajuda e é bem vinda, mas pode ser colocada até posteriormente neste espaço.
artarts (2015-01-06 00:56:04+00:00): Bom, imaginei que só deveríamos usar Inglês nesses comentários.

Quando vi seu nome imaginei ser extrangeiro também.

Onde viu meu comentário? 
O que estava fazendo quando veio a percebê-lo? 
É da região?
woodpeck (2015-01-05 00:28:36+00:00): This looks like an un-discussed import. I cannot find anything on the Wiki or the imports mailing list about it. Are you aware of http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines? Please explain.
zool (2015-01-05 00:44:49+00:00): Yes, it would be good to hear more.
Jorge Meroglio (2015-01-08 02:24:14+00:00): Hi, I wasn't familiar with the import guidelines, sorry for that. It was just a little experiment, however it took so many days to improve the importing algorithm, It would be a mess to just kill the entire changeset because of few details. I think that the mistakes could be corrected easily, this is why the fixme tag was created.
Regards and thank you,

Jorge
pangoSE (2020-01-10 00:32:45+00:00): tack för hjälpen med stugorna!
mweper (2015-01-03 13:21:49+00:00): Por favor, etiqueta correctamente los edificios. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Map_Features

Para más ayuda me puedes contactar.
mweper (2015-01-03 13:23:22+00:00): Por favor, ubica correctamente el edificio. Éstos no se colocan sobre la carretera. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Map_Features

Para más ayuda me puedes contactar.
chattiewoman (2015-01-03 13:32:06+00:00): Frohes Neues!
Die Grenzen von Bielefeld und Brönninghausen sind seit (?) deiner Änderung keine geschlossene Linie mehr - kannst du dir das vielleicht nochmal ansehen? 
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=4&error=71252252
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=4&error=71256290
Markus Olderdissen (2015-01-03 15:15:34+00:00): joah. schien aber ok zu sein. abwarten was die nächste auswertung meint.
chattiewoman (2015-01-03 18:07:16+00:00): OK, danke!
emacsen (2015-01-03 12:09:27+00:00): Hi. see you've been making a number of edits the last few days. Congrats and welcome to OSM!

A quick note though- unless your home has a sign on it saying "JOSGREVAR", we don't put people's names on their homes.

I've gone ahead and removed it. If there is a sign there, please feel free to put it back.
fkv (2015-01-07 22:49:51+00:00): Diese Änderung ist ziemlich sicher falsch, siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/295539 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/242645.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-06 14:02:13+00:00): Hi - I think that something went a bit wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3353788/history here.  It's now called "Cemetry" - I presume that you were actually trying to name a cemetery somewhere else?

If there's anything I can help with, please don't hesitate to let me know.
cMartin (2015-01-03 16:16:48+00:00): Die Wasserrutsche ist für mich eigentlich kein highway=path. Hier würde doch eher ein waterway=* passen. Zusätzlich könnte man den Aufstiegsturm mit highway=steps hinzufügen...
ahzf (2015-01-04 05:42:20+00:00): Hi...
danke für den Hinweis. Hatte wohl leider einfach verpennt das gleich richtig zu machen. Hab hier noch folgendes gefunden: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_water_slides

Gruß...
 Achim