piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Staffan_T (2023-01-24 14:56:58+00:00): Hi Milan,

I'm not sure how official the street names in that area are. It is not a residential area and most of the buildings are small cottages. The names I entered ten years ago might be informal, or they may have changed. There is (or was) a map with street names posted near the entrance to the area, and that's where I got the street names from originally. Some were also displayed on signs at intersections. I am currently too far from the area to check if the names are still the same, but I might be able to visit the area this summer.

If the government data is more recent I'd go with their names (at least until I've double checked). Do you know what street names they use, are they very different? Do you have a link to the government source?

In other similar areas nearby, streets have two sets of names: one with numerical names (presumably for administrative purposes) and one with pronouncable names used by the locals. I don't remember if that's the case here but if the government data shows numbers rather than names, then I'd presume that there are two sets of names.
borovac (2023-01-24 15:13:22+00:00): Hi Staffan_T

I believe that names from the field are more reliable, and one of the basic rules of OSM is to add things as they are in the field.
So I won't change anything.
Thanks for the reply and the information.

All best Milan
_torsten_ (2018-04-02 19:55:28+00:00): Gehört diese MTB-Relation zum Mountainbikenetz Rhön? 
http://www.rhoen-active.de/mountainbiking.html
Dann kann sie in dieser Realtion eingebunden werden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5397134
_torsten_ (2018-04-02 19:56:29+00:00): Gehört diese MTB-Relation zum Mountainbikenetz Rhön? 
http://www.rhoen-active.de/mountainbiking.html
Dann kann sie in dieser Realtion eingebunden werden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5397134
joost schouppe (2015-06-10 20:32:09+00:00): Hola René,

Hay algún lugar donde se puede encontrar más información sobre este import? Es importante que se sabe si la información es compatible con la licencia OSM. También habría que reclasificar los puestos de Salud de hospital a clinic, como son más chicos, agregar un fixme como La ubicación no es muy exacto, limpiar tags no válidos en OSM etcétera
os-emmer (2024-09-25 19:43:15+00:00): Hello PaulKaz,
a long time ago you added
emergency_service=yes
here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148061680
This tag is undocumented. What does that mean? Based on the translation for the name of this object could possibly be an office=government and maybe an government=emergency. But I do not know this place so I am just guessing.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=government
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:government=emergency
mueschel (2017-11-18 13:08:11+00:00): Hi Petr,
it's an old changeset, but I just stumbled across this node and its tag "direction:highway=-1" - this is used only here, maybe you can revise this tagging?
Cheers, Jan
chnav (2015-01-17 11:13:37+00:00): Товарищ, зачем удалил сопку Миронова ? Не делай так больше, пожалуйста.
fkv (2019-03-28 22:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68646143 where the changeset comment is: durch einen Validatorfehler provozierte Zerstückelung revertiert in der Hoffnung, damit zu ergründen, warum hier 2 verschiedene Brunnenpassagen gemappt sind
eggie (2019-08-29 14:14:28+00:00): Na vele jaren weer aan het mappen, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
zstadler (2020-02-23 14:35:15+00:00): Hello,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1956144558 was added in this edit, but it is a gate disconnected from any way. Is this a mistake or incomplete mapping?
Marc_ch (2019-01-14 21:47:19+00:00): salut
que signifies
avz 	328
cs_dir:forward 	2
sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27595773 ?
Salutations,
Marc
Marc_ch (2018-03-27 11:00:41+00:00): Bonjour,
quel est la signification des tags avz cs_dir et ssvz ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185101185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185101193
Salutations,
Marc
parsewski (2022-03-25 13:51:19+00:00): Hi! Aus reiner Neugier: Woher kommt die Bezeichnung loc_name = Beamtenschlucht? Ich gehe da mehrmals täglich drüber und freue mich jedes mal darüber wie spot on die Bezeichnung ist!
Girolamo (2022-03-25 14:19:29+00:00): Aus dem Munde erfahrener Beamten, die seit langem in den nahegelegenen Ressorts tätig bzw. nun schon in Pension sind. Es ist also eine umgangssprachliche Verwendung. Wer weiß, was es sonst noch an anundfürsich weitläufig unbekannten historischen Benennungen in diesem Grätzel gibt. :)
canfe (2026-05-02 15:20:38+00:00): Sagrato del Duomo non è nome proprio.
Tolto.
lalo-t (2019-04-08 06:05:40+00:00): Puerta de Fierro
canfe (2023-07-22 16:43:43+00:00): Ma come fa a chiamarsi
Sentiero quadrato giallo vuoto
???
SomeoneElse (2021-12-18 14:10:18+00:00): Hello gna,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 9(!) years ago.  On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on the node here.  We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source. 
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
blackboxlogic (2021-04-26 15:54:09+00:00): I wonder if this is still "proposed"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32731550
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-11 21:22:58+00:00): This changeset includes some tags like _amenity_=hospital , and it appears to be an import.  Could you explain what the data source is?  And is the tagging what you intended?
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:27:07+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185369907,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185369910
have no tags. What are they?
eric22 (2017-03-28 19:45:11+00:00): Fixed
ClothingFactory (2017-04-24 03:53:18+00:00): sungai sepanjang sing sebelah endi iki rek ?? 
soale durung paham area sepanjang
Totor (2023-12-07 04:35:16+00:00): Hi Mr Boot,
I tried to locate Sea Breeze Resto a few years back, but was unable to find it.
The road is in the middle of a dense mangrove on both sides and there are no side roads.
Are you sure there is no mix-up in the location ?
MrBoot (2023-12-07 15:14:53+00:00): At that time the map was not that detailed. I have moved the location to the position which is shown on streetview. Thanks for the reminder.
CycleMapper (2021-06-11 20:42:20+00:00): Ich sehe da keinen Weg ;)
DaCor (2020-09-16 07:26:14+00:00): Hi craghead. Would you mind taking a look at this OSM note as you may be able to offer some insight. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2229832

Its in relation to a road you mapped in this changeset as "Broe's Lane". The note is calling this "River Road". Just wondering if you can assist in determining the correct name, thanks, Dave
craghead (2020-09-18 09:56:58+00:00): Hi Dave. I have been living in this area for over 25 years and have never heard it referred to as "River Road", most likely because it runs beside, not a river but, a substantial stream. I have only ever heard of it referred to as Broe's Lane. I have no idea why it should not have been called McGuire's Lane but that is the situation as it stands!
ElementoGEO (2015-02-05 11:54:20+00:00): esse conjunto de alterações está muito mal desenhado. 
Deverá ser apagado.
ElementoGEO (2015-02-05 11:58:33+00:00): or in english: 
This set of changes is not well designed.
I'd like it to be deleted.
Any comments?
user_1470980 (2018-02-01 21:16:31+00:00): Hallo evod, die Adresse Satzingerweg 10 kommt mehrfach vor. Den OSM Wiki Regeln entsprechend darf eine Adresse nur jeweils einmal vergeben werden.

Grüße Johann
Nazamiranda (2017-12-01 05:07:32+00:00): Nombre: Plazita Barrio Maximiliano Toro
Peter Dobratz (2015-01-29 06:03:11+00:00): Generally, for a group of adjacent tennis courts, we just put a single rectangle around the all of the tennis courts with a leisure=pitch and sport=tennis tag.  You've got tennis courts inside of tennis courts here, and this seems like tagging for the renderer which is best practice.
Grant Humphries (2015-01-29 20:52:46+00:00): Yeah this is tagging for the renderer (don't you think it looks cool!) which I know is not good practice.  I'll discontinue doing this and feel free to make edits to the ones I have added.
andershl (2021-08-12 19:38:12+00:00): Where do these peak names originate? Officially approved?
GerdP (2015-10-16 15:01:05+00:00): please review way 38480482
What does highway=unbuilt mean?
I seem to be able to see fragments of a road.
Covid-LockDown (2020-10-21 16:58:25+00:00): Hi they,
You have assigned an incorrect classification as secondary rather than tertiary at way 51965176,way 51965457
RussianMapper (2017-07-27 11:19:11+00:00): Добрый день! Как я понимаю, в комментарии к changeset'у идёт речь о компании Jeppesen - jeppesen.com На их сайте схем с нумерацией стоянок, опубликованных под открытой лицензией (да и вообще хоть каких-то схем) я не нашёл. Полагаю, они поставляют их только на коммерческих условиях. Скажите, пожалуйста, вы как-то получили от них разрешение на внесение информации из их материалов?
gendy54 (2019-07-22 19:35:29+00:00): Alerte Osmose sur le name Jardin de la Marie, vs Mairie. A toi de voir
Rom1 (2019-07-22 20:03:45+00:00): Faux positif.
gendy54 (2019-07-23 09:17:41+00:00): Ok, j'ai coché faux positif
JayTurnr (2017-07-17 17:51:19+00:00): Not garden, residential. See tag: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden
SomeoneElse (2016-07-14 12:58:42+00:00): Hi,
I suspect some of this imported data might need reviewing - it looks a bit suspect (I'm sure the import process was technically accurate - it just doesn't match what's on the ground).
Take a look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185718609 for example, and the "standard" map as seen at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/44.03540/18.22713 .  At first glance it looks like a couple of "random" POIs (a place of worship in a field, and a water tap).  However, look at the underlying Mapbox imagery and they match it, but the Corine data doesn't.
Do you have a plan to correct issues like this?
Best Regards,
Andy
opendcc (2015-11-13 17:27:47+00:00): Die Gebäude der Aubenhamer Ziegelei sehen aber ein klein bischen anders aus ... könntest Du das bitte richtig einzeichnen? Danke!
Jiří Komárek (2019-07-21 16:38:27+00:00): Hi, I know this is "a bit" older changeset. However, can you remember why you changed the name from Novo-Voznesenovka to Boz-Uchuk? This is the name of the village near by. They connected together? Or...? Because even the Wikipedia thinks this is a separated village called Novovoznesenovka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novovoznesenovka

I was there recently and it looks like a separated village...
Thanks for your help!
Jiri
GerdP (2015-10-31 10:09:14+00:00): Bitte prüfen:
habe highway=moving_walkway durch
highway=footway
indoor=yes
ersetzt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34988905
eggie (2020-02-28 11:31:45+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Nakaner (2015-03-27 10:09:30+00:00): Glaubst du wirklich, dass diese Brücke ein Fuß- und Radweg ist? Sie hat am Anfang und Ende Treppen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25521638/history http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240
maraf24 (2015-02-25 01:02:51+00:00): Dlaczego zrobiłeś z Kamieńca Ząbkowickiego miasto ? To jest wieś.
TS222 (2015-02-25 06:30:21+00:00): Zobacz opisy tagów village i town. 
town.
Jest to siedziba gminy i centrum dla okolicznych wsi. Są tam sklepy przedszkola szkoły. Dla mnie są to wystarczające kryteria.

OSM nie jest ścisła...zobacz definicję village: 1000-10k mieszkańców...czyli większość wiosek powinniśmy przemianować na hamlet..

hamlet ma w opisie 100-200 mieszkańców....i co zrobić?

W sensie opisowym Kamieniec nie jest taką samą wsią jak pobliski Śrem czy Suszka
maraf24 (2015-02-25 10:57:55+00:00): To jednak było celowe działanie :)
Akurat wiki jest bardzo ścisłe w tym zakresie. Tutaj http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Poland/Podzia%C5%82_administracyjny
jasno stwierdzono, że ma być wieś. Z problemem nieprawidłowych opisów tagów dotyczących miejscowości na polskiej wiki już wcześniej się spotkałem, Trzeba je zaktualizować wg informacji z  powyższego linka i mam zamiast to niedługo zrobić.
TS222 (2015-02-25 12:03:48+00:00): OK, dzięki, nie znałem tych ustaleń. W takim razie musi być village.
Nie jestem przekonany do słuszności tych ustaleń ze względów powyższych, ale nie jest to dla mnie warte sporu :)
TS222 (2015-02-25 12:05:25+00:00): Z ciekawostek to wójt Kamieńca bardzo chce być burmistrzem  i kto wie czy my się nie uda :)
Super-Map (2021-07-27 18:32:22+00:00): Hi frodrigo, I contact you because you're the owner of this relation: "n°2501856" in this changeset and this one is "broken" and useless... and this one is correct and functional: "n°4505478", so as I try to improve this map and to clean up, maybe it will be useful to delete the broken relation for to go forward and to see this map more "functional" with less "mistakes". By advance, thanks for your understanding.
Super-Map (2021-07-27 18:43:05+00:00): In fact this one "4505478" don't seem to be correct equally I will inform the "owner", but I confirm, It will be useful to delete all broken relations and not useful any more in OSM...
frodrigo (2021-07-28 20:58:07+00:00): One is with start_date, the other with end_date. But look the same.
AndjelaS (2019-02-27 11:03:21+00:00): Dear hodgo81,

Do you agree to remove tags bicycle=yes, foot=yes and motor_vehicle=yes because there already exists a tag access= yes and indicating that it is legally-enshrined right of access, so there is no need to duplicate the data, because it leads to error reporting logical issues in Osmose as 3220 access: Including car, horse, moped, hazmat and so on, unless explicitly excluded?

Regards,
AndjelaS
mtmail (2015-07-18 23:40:06+00:00): Hi Gary,
Do you remember why you changed railway=rail to work=limit on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185304899/ ?

Is this railway=dismantled or railway=disused maybe?
adiatmad (2020-12-23 03:26:31+00:00): Halo kartalakopang,
Semoga Anda sehat selalu.

Anda menambahkan tag admin_level=99 di sini (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/165613425)
Berdasarkan Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative) tag admin_level mayoritas digabung dengan tag boundary_administrative (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=administrative#combinations).

Apakah admin_level=99 itu kesalahan penulisan atau ada arti tertentu?

Terima kasih.

---

Hello kartalakopang,
Hope you are doing well.

You added the tag admin_level = 99 here (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/165613425)
Based on the Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative) the majority of the admin_level tags are combined with the boundary_administrative tag (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=administrative#combinations).

Is admin_level = 99 a typo or does it mean something?

Best regards.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 10:51:04+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92891285/history has HF=oui key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-03 09:53:17+00:00): What is your source of Old English name for Warsaw?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-03 09:54:40+00:00): in case that there is a reason for that: it should be readded as I removed it as bogus
voschix (2015-08-11 09:44:03+00:00): In questa zona c'è un grosso problema di non-allineamento degli edifici importati con le foto satellitari:
PCN2006: 4m sud
PCN2012: 10m sud
Bing Satellite: 9m sud
DarkSwan_Import (2015-08-11 20:07:53+00:00): Confermo, purtroppo quei dati sono vecchi. Fortunatamente è disponibile il Database Geotopografico - lotto Rovigo Basso Polesine che sto convertendo (aggiornato a fine 2013, quindi ottimo temporalmente). I nuovi dati oltre ad essere ricalcati molto meglio, aggiungono nuovi edifici che mancavano alla CTR. L'errore medio confrontando Mapbox Satellite e PCN2012 è di 2m circa (ricordo che le foto satellitari non sono perfettamente perpendicolari al terreno quindi gli edifici possono sembrare leggermente spostati). Ho inserito io tutta la provincia di Rovigo e appena ho terminato di aggiungere i dati della provincia di Padova (anch'essa aggiornata al 2013, sempre Database Geotopografico) mi dedicherò a quella di Rovigo. È un lavoro lungo, in cui devo preservare i dati/POI inseriti dagli altri utenti e unirli alle nuove geometrie. Se ti interessa un estratto delle nuove geometrie per saggiarne la precisione mandami un messaggio privato. Porta pazienza :)
aceman444 (2022-03-30 15:20:12+00:00): Zdravim, aky je zdroj takehoto nazvu na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186238599 , aj s preklepmi? Ziadny neuvadzate, co by ste mali. 
To iste na kostole.
Dakujem
aceman444 (2022-03-30 15:25:58+00:00): Skoda tolkej chybajucej diakritiky v nazoch a zase bez zdroja, takze tazko sa to overi.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-13 07:28:54+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3264951 ?
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 02:41:55+00:00): Hi dkiselev. Your edit looks awesome, but I need you to improve highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/186297285) due crossing with water body. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143787630). Thank you.
ChehrehBargi (2023-06-06 07:59:49+00:00): سلام ضمن تقدیر از زحمات شما، برای ثبت کوچه ها از برچسب highway=residential استفاده میکنیم. در مورد کوچه هایی هم که تنها قابل تردد برای افراد پیاده و دوچرخه ها هستند، میتوانیم از برچسب راه پیاده (highway=footway) یا برچسب باریک راه دوچرخه و پیاده (highway=cycleway - bicycle=designated - foot=designated) استفاده کنیم.
user_242798 (2016-12-30 13:34:48+00:00): Warming: isolated node which must be connected to a way (5x)
A barrier (gate, stile) to be effective must be connected to a way. Otherwise it's just a work of art.
DUGA (2021-03-08 23:43:33+00:00): Please do not name cell towers like "Cell Site", they don't have any name at all.
Глеб (2022-09-16 08:14:57+00:00): Можно я снесу названия со зданий?
GerdP (2015-11-15 10:49:42+00:00): please review:
What is meant with higway=historic?
Is is rarely used and not clear.
Did you mean something like highway=dismantled  or maybe 
historic=highway ?
Spongilla (2016-01-27 05:33:52+00:00): Hallo Gerd,
dismantled trifft es am ehesten. Gibt es das bei Highway überhaupt, im Wiki habe ich es nur für Railways gefunden. An er Stelle ist noch eine alte Brücke erkennbar, aber ohne erkennbare Zuwegung. Daten habe ich schon geändert.
GerdP (2016-01-27 08:11:39+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Nach meinem Verständnis passt dann eher
highway=abandoned or disused bzw. 
abandoned:highway=* falls Du die ehemalige Bedeutung noch kennst. 
Im Wiki findet man highway=dismantled nicht, nur highway=razed, was praktisch das gleiche bedeutet: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Drazed
Verschwunden ist die Brücke ja noch nicht, also eher abandoned:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dabandoned
mariotomo (2021-04-28 15:48:39+00:00): hi there. are you still active with OSM? you still remember what this was about? I'm puzzled by the fields you added to the Way: 186580247, namely

    "EDICION_HI"="0.00000000"
    "OBJECTID"="2146.00000000; 2167.00000000; 2312.00000000;2312.00000000;2182.00000000;2182.00000000;2312.00000000;2312.00000000;2182.00000000;2182.00000000;2182.00000000"
    "OBJECTID_1"="1241;1254;1319;1319;1263;1263;1319;1319;1263;1263;1263"
    "SUBTIPO"="IGN TOMMY GUARDIA 1:50K;IGN TOMMY GUARDIA 1:50K;IGN TOMMY GUARDIA 1:50K;IGN TOMMY GUARDIA 1:50K;IGN TOMMY GUARDIA 1:50K;IGN TOMMY GUARDIA 1:50K;MB"

looks like an import from their database, is it?
thank you for your consideration.
FajrAl (2025-01-16 11:19:21+00:00): Hi, I'm about to re-digitize this area
SomeoneElse (2015-11-01 13:14:17+00:00): It would appear that you've made some maxweight values in the US incorrect here.  For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32719427/history was previously "maxweight=5 tons" and you changed it to "maxweight=5".  5 tons in the US is not the same as 5 metric tons.
uboot (2015-11-02 11:30:02+00:00): I changed all wrong edits in this changeset. Some of them were changed in '5 tons' an then changed back to '5'. If it where '5 short tons' at the beginning it would be easier understandable that it is not 5 metric tons.
Thanks, Markus
SomeoneElse (2015-11-02 21:26:13+00:00): Thanks for that - there's a different discussion to be had about whether "maxweight=4.5359237" is the best way of tagging it (see the discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/karussell/diary/36220 for example), but at least they're not showing a maxweight that's too large now.
Canyonsrcool (2021-02-17 21:12:07+00:00): Hey there,  I'm wondering about the A10 ref.  Do you have a source for it?  I don't see anything from imagery on the ground and Belize does not have any other ref information.  Thanks!
tubroos (2021-02-18 19:00:54+00:00): Hello - do you mean a reference for the name? I can see the course of the road clearly on satellite imagery...
tubroos (2021-02-18 19:01:38+00:00): The road is known locally as both the Chiquibul Road and, in the section that passes through the Mountain Pine Ridge Forest Reserve, as the A10.
tubroos (2021-02-18 19:02:54+00:00): Perhaps A10 should be listed as an alternate name rather than "ref"... I see what you mean...
Canyonsrcool (2021-02-18 20:29:23+00:00): Yeah, an alternate name would make sense, since Belize does not have other ref=* tags on other highways.
tubroos (2021-02-18 22:19:11+00:00): I've done all the main road segments; bridges still to do in a bit. Thanks for the suggestion.
BCNorwich (2019-08-27 06:24:50+00:00): Hi, 
The tag landuse=residential is not needed as building=yes or more correctly building=house conveys the meaning that the area is residential. 

Further all your tags landuse=residential on buildings are duplication as you have tagged the wider area as landuse=residential.

A lot of your uses of the tag addr:street= are incorrect, it is supposed to hold a street name, <val='Park Avenue',<Priority; inDataSet: false, inStandard: false, selected: false>> is not a street name.

You have also mixed Address Interpolation with individual address annotation. The two do not intermix please use one form or the other

I also notice that several building outlines in other changesets are self intersecting.

Could you please correct these anomalies?

Regards Bernard
eggie (2021-10-19 15:50:56+00:00): Na Jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-29 20:12:45+00:00): Way #186744575 (Bushaltestelle Medienberg Südseite) ist einklich nicht von der Hauptfahrbahn baulich getrennt (ist ja gleichzeitig Beschleunigungsstreifen) und sollte eher als lane da rangetaggt werden, was meinst du? Ich bin heute da lang und war tatsächlich etwas verwirrt über dem Serviceway.
reneman (2017-05-31 13:50:37+00:00): Hallo, ich war da draußen schon ewig nicht mehr und kenne daher den aktuellen Zustand dieser Örtlichkeit nicht gut genug um dir eine qualifizierte Antwort geben zu können. Rein nach dem Bing-Luftbild könntest du recht haben, ... Beachte bei einer Änderung bitte auch die Linienführung der Buslinien. Gruß René
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-31 14:48:29+00:00): Erledigt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49138443. Die Busspur hab ich busway=lane getaggt, die Relationen sind mit roles übernommen und müssten passen.