piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2021-02-07 05:44:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
Area = 1684.03393005
Jurisdiccion = Estatal
Nombre = Zona de Recuperación Ambiental Cerro El Tajo
Numero = 27
fid = 1
id = 1
natural reserve = Zona de Recuperación Ambiental "Cerro El Tajo"
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 17:30:14+00:00): ¡Bienvenido a OSM! Has añadido un mayor número de etiquetas desconocidas en este conjunto de cambios. 
Área = 1684.03393005 
Jurisdiccion = Estatal 
Nombre = Zona de Recuperación Ambiental Cerro El Tajo 
Numero = 27 
fid = 1 
id = 1 
reserva natural = Zona de Recuperación Ambiental "Cerro El Tajo" 
Por favor, explique la fuente de esta información y el significado de las claves.
gszkr (2023-01-09 09:44:12+00:00): Skąd oznaczenie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904510425 jako ciągu pieszo-rowerowego? Mam nagranie z rejestratora jazdy z czerwca 2022 - na pewno na skrzyżowaniu Gliwickiej z Przemysłową brak jest jakichkolwiek oznakowań wskazujących na CPR, czyli jest to zwykły chodnik przy jezdni.
NorthCrab (2023-01-09 19:19:57+00:00): https://i.imgur.com/eTbyN13.png
Tutaj chyba jest faktycznie ciąg ale wygląda że początek/koniec jest źle oznaczony. Zdjęcie na skrzyżowaniu Smolnickiej z Przemysłową.
NorthCrab (2023-01-09 19:20:11+00:00): Zdjęcie z Binga
gszkr (2023-01-09 23:03:01+00:00): Tam faktycznie jest jakaś totalna herezja... Poprawiłem (przywróciłem) oznakowanie tego "czegoś" wzdłuż 408 na CPR od numeru 29 do Smolnickiej, bo rzeczywiście przeglądając jeszcze raz nagranie ktoś oznakował to "coś" od 29 jako CPR ignorując przepisy dotyczące np. minimalnej szerokości (3,0m w terenie zabudowanym). Smolnicka i Przemysłowa też wyglądają na ledwie może mające 2m (a obstawiam, że bliżej im do 1,5m), do tego z strzępami oznakowania pionowego. Ech...
redd (2022-07-08 12:23:00+00:00): Hi there,
maybe there was a typo added in "roof:material=thatchq" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904513166#map=16/-32.9382/28.0159
May you have a look again?
Thanks,
redd
MxxCon (2021-02-06 20:24:26+00:00): Is papyrus POI accurate? afaik they closed all their stores https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/24/business/papyrus-closing-bankruptcy.html
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98827067
jmapb (2021-02-06 21:28:52+00:00): Hmm... Shop looked open to me. It might be operating as a sub-shop of Face Values.
canfe (2021-02-08 10:32:55+00:00): Hai aggiunto add:street, ma è una piazza ci va place.
Ho corretto.
Alecs01 (2021-02-08 14:39:19+00:00): Era corretto prima, addr:street indica la via (che sia via, corso, viale, piazza ecc ... non fa differenza), addr:place invece indica la località, nei casi in cui i numeri civici non facciano riferimento a una strada.
canfe (2021-02-08 16:19:26+00:00): Hai ragione. Scusa. Rimetto a  posto.
canfe (2021-02-10 13:15:08+00:00): E invece no. Era come dicevo.
per le Piazze si usa place. Come da wiki.
Solo che ID non lo sa...!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
Alecs01 (2021-02-10 16:42:33+00:00): Questa mi mancava. Non ha molto senso in ogni caso, temo sia solo una delle tante confusioni generate dall'introduzione del tag place=square. Per quale motivo bisognerebbe taggare in modo diverso "Via Roma, 1" rispetto a "Piazza Roma, 1"?
Filip009 (2026-05-28 13:01:11+00:00): Ahoj, si si istý, že toto je až tak náročný úsek, že by tam turista musel preskakovať kamene? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904554457 (až hore po chatu)
Jany48 (2026-05-30 20:13:55+00:00): Určite nie a neviem prečo som to pred 5 rokmi takto otagoval. Každopádne je to už preč https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183416849
Filip009 (2026-05-30 20:17:47+00:00): Vďaka :)
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:54:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
mariotomo (2021-02-07 23:38:38+00:00): hola Karina, bienvenida a OSM.  me encontraba revisando las contribuciones y veo estas "Son verídicas", que es un comentario curioso.  por lo general, uno con su comentario ayuda a los demás a entender qué fue la contribución, y por supuesto nadie pone en duda que sean verídicas pues!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
el wiki lo explica en manera más completa.
disfruta del mapeo, ciao, Mario
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:54:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
eggie (2021-02-06 21:14:12+00:00): Solitaire bruggen die verder geen vervolg hebben en toch niet hoeven te routeren tag ik meestal alleen als vlak.

man_made=bridge
layer=1

Maaar wellicht gaan de aansluitende tracks of paden nog komen. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-02-06 21:16:06+00:00): Voorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.71893/4.44661
Edmundus (2021-02-08 16:10:41+00:00): Er zijn geen duidelijke paden. Het zijn eenvoudige brugconstructies om van het ene land op het andere land te komen. 
Die "man_made = bridge" kende ik nog niet. Dankjewel voor de aanwijzing.
Met vriendelijke groet van Eddy.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:08:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
eteb3 (2021-08-17 11:14:10+00:00): Is the "Barclays Bank" stop in Market Place still called that? Looks like Barclays has gone, and replaced by Moore Thompson
Adambro (2021-08-17 11:25:23+00:00): I've just looked it up in NaPTAN and the stop has now been renamed as per the stop opposite to The Stage PH so I've updated it accordingly.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-18 12:08:31+00:00): Likewise, fixed this too
compdude (2021-02-15 01:46:47+00:00): Why is this not a trunk? It looks like it should be a trunk to me. Also, in the future, if you are downgrading a road from trunk please explain why in the change description.
Roadsguy (2021-02-09 03:32:31+00:00): Please stop demoting random roads from trunk to primary just because you don't think they're "special" enough. Significant length is not the sole deciding factor in whether a road qualifies as trunk. In the case of VA 28, it's a high-speed, limited-access road with expressway-like design (though not a freeway) and which carries significant traffic volumes. By established tagging conventions, it qualifies as trunk.
NKA (2024-09-14 10:14:56+00:00): There are conflicts between your mapping of maxspeed=* and maxspeed:forward/backward=*.
user_5359 (2021-02-07 05:58:23+00:00): Hello! Why did you add four house number to one building area, if you also create building with the three other house numbers? By the way if a building have more than one housenumber: don't add them to the way add nodes inside of the building and add them there (one node one address)
I have remove the three house numbers.
rab (2021-12-30 14:49:25+00:00): Hi, according to maxar premium beta the construction seems to be completed
clairedelune (2021-12-31 20:32:16+00:00): Indeed, thank you for your comment, the tags have been updated.
BCNorwich (2021-02-09 09:01:16+00:00): A triplicated section of highway repaired, and a duplicated section. This time a wood drawn within a wood (duplication), duplicate wood removed.
arcanma (2021-02-07 17:20:19+00:00): Salve, non c'è motivo di cancellare strade private, vanno segnalate con il tag access=private (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access), ma non cancellate
eggie (2021-02-07 07:10:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM.. What was your intention adding Mostecká-53/4 Praha-1 in A'dam city?
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-02-07 07:11:21+00:00): reverted by changeset #98840020
user_5359 (2021-02-07 05:29:11+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways).

Please check booth relations.
MxxCon (2021-02-07 05:39:28+00:00): Good catch.👍 This is a leftover turn restriction from before I separated this street into 2 1-way streets. I removed it in changeset 98838710
eggie (2021-02-07 07:29:07+00:00): Dag Edwin.. Niet doorgaande straten in een woonwijk taggen met highway=residenial..
Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-07 07:27:09+00:00): Dag Edwin.. De regel leisure=playground ontbreekt nog. Dan krijg je pas het symbool.
MVG
eggie
fabiotofy (2022-12-25 11:50:41+00:00): ciao, sicuro che la pista sia la numero 15 ? questa skimap riporta numero 10 -> https://www.turismofvg.it/proxyvfs.axd/null/r218416
fabiotofy (2022-12-25 11:54:04+00:00): anche per capire come mai il nome della funivia principale sulla skimap sopramenzionata mettono "Funifor Monte Zoncolan" ed il numero di riferimento 101.. tutt'altro da quanto riportato
osm915 (2021-02-11 17:38:30+00:00): Hallo  Ijon-Tichy
herzlich willkommen bei OSM und prima das du nachfragst, wenn du dir nicht sicher bist!
Ich würde die Hütte und den Weg erst löschen, wenn vor Ort nichts mehr erkennbar ist.

Wenn die Schutzhütte verfallen ist und zB nicht mehr als Regenschutz genutzt werden kann, wäre es am besten sie mit abandoned:amenity=shelter zu kennzeichnen (siehe http://osm.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix). Den Namen würde ich noch dran lassen, bis von dem Bauwerk gar nichts mehr zu sehen ist.
Wenn die Hütte notfalls noch verwendet werden kann, würde ich noch amenity=shelter lassen und nur building:condition=partly_ruinous oder description="verfallene Schutzhütte" oder sowas ergänzen.
Nicht iO ist die Schutzhütte jetzt zusätzlich als tourism=alpine_hut zu kennzeichnen. Das wäre nur korrekt wenn dort eine "bewirtschaftete Schutzhütte" wäre (siehe https://osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut). Auch "verfallene" in den name aufzunehmen ist nicht üblich/sinnvoll (https://osm.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name).

Welcher Weg ist denn verwildert? https://osm.org/way/68685413 oder https://osm.org/way/490129945
Und ist der komplette Weg vor Ort nicht mehr erkennbar? Ansonsten solltest du den Weg erst mal drin lassen.
Wenn er nicht mehr breit genug für Fahrzeuge, aber noch begehbar ist, würde highway=path besser passen.
Der Kommentar zu https://osm.org/changeset/89482219 deutet zumindest darauf hin.

Noch viel Spaß beim Mappen und immer raus damit, wenn du Fragen hast!
user_11418917 (2021-02-07 01:44:56+00:00): Stop Adding spams!
eggie (2021-02-07 07:14:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback...  OSM is een kaart die door vele instanties wordt gebruikt. Beter dit soort toevoegingen niet doen.
Wanneer in volksmond dit al lange tijd zo genoemd wordt gebruik dan loc_name=

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-07 07:20:56+00:00): Dag knobirino... name heb ik omgezet in loc_name=
gr eggie
eggie (2021-02-07 07:20:04+00:00): Dag knobirino

Het was hier al goed gemapt. De info staat hier op de relatie.. dus hoort niet nogmaals toegevoegd te worden. 
Ik heb je toevoeging verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-07 07:41:47+00:00): Het kleine eilandje zal straks nu ook weer terugkomen op de kaart.
os-emmer (2025-05-10 17:22:21+00:00): Hello Hikerandy,
you added some signs here, for example this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8400997983
I think name="No Entry" is not correct as this is probably not the name of the sign. Could you check if inscription="No Entry" would be fitting?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription
Thanks
os-emmer (2025-05-10 17:29:14+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23RU
Hikerandy (2025-05-10 22:33:20+00:00): Hi os-emmer, You're absolutely correct; my bad. Thanks for pointing this out. The signs probably shouldn't have a name at all. And the tag "description" needs to be changed to "inscription". You're welcome to fix it as you see fit, or I can take care of it myself in the near future.
os-emmer (2025-05-11 09:05:23+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply. I just fixed that.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166099143
Allison P (2021-02-07 06:43:35+00:00): Fat fingers... that's what I get for using iD on my phone.
user_5359 (2021-02-07 05:27:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your help to get a better quality. But a building isn't only a area, and address aren't a name on building node. I have correct this, see https://www.osm.org/way/47773747 ( and the booth nodes inside)
spiregrain (2021-02-07 06:00:54+00:00): Thanks!
canfe (2023-09-19 09:42:50+00:00): non è layer=-1 è building passage
Matthias Frank (2023-10-12 06:45:46+00:00): okay, d'accordo. Ho visto che l'hai già corretto. Grazie.
abakus_uploader (2021-02-07 23:31:45+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Allison P (2021-02-07 06:41:38+00:00): Was a bit of an overreach on my part. I meant to change it to access=customers. I made a list of all roads in the county with Lane in the name and made sure they weren't maintained by ACHD but I forgot to distinguish those roads opened up to customers.
h551w (2021-02-07 19:10:11+00:00): No worries, yeah it sounds like access=customers would be the most accurate here, I've gone ahead and updated it to that
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-18 01:05:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99482890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in te Philippines following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4752
olo81 (2021-02-24 18:21:37+00:00): cześć!
widzę że masz jakiś nowszy projekt niż ten z bip dąbrowy górniczej, może masz gdzieś pod ręką link do tego projektu, było by fajnie :)
olo81 (2021-02-24 18:24:37+00:00): ten z dąbrowy wrzuciłem na kanał telegrama, skalibrowany jest pod wtyczkę piclayer dla josm 
https://t.me/OpenStreetMapPolskaKanal
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-18 01:05:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99482890 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in te Philippines following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4752
skquinn (2021-02-10 10:36:58+00:00): Hi,

Please save and start a new changeset before switching areas. Changesets are shown in the history view by a bounding box and in your case, since you edited three buildings on an island in the Caribbean and then some in California, that stretches across a huge chunk of the southern US and northern Mexico. In the future, an edit like this should be three separate changesets, one for each area.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:30:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
trigpoint (2021-02-08 11:57:02+00:00): Bore da
Whilst adding Welsh names is important please do not lose valid English names, or hide them away in a note. They should be moved to name:en. It is also good practice to add a name:cy tag for Welsh names.

For example
name=Ffos Anoddun
name:cy=Ffos Anoddun
name:en=Fairy Glen

Diolch Phil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:44:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:28:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:52:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
DressyPear4 (2021-02-08 18:26:40+00:00): Fiz alguns ajustes, você pode conferir mais detalhes aqui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98835642
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:29:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:39:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:20:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:29:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Joseph R P (2022-01-24 23:50:11+00:00): This is a bit of a late comment, but do you have a source for these changes to the Las Vegas city limits? This map shows them here, and they're quite messy: https://lasvegassun.com/news/2019/jul/12/las-vegas-vs-clark-county-there-are-differences-be/

Admittedly you did clean up the messy boundaries, but the administrative boundary line is intended for mapping official political boundaries like the Las Vegas city limits and therefore should be accurate and not always aesthetically pleasing. You also engulfed the Las Vegas Paiute Reservation into the city boundaries, which shouldn't make sense since Native American reservations are self-governing territories and are not under control by any city, county, or state.
user_5359 (2021-02-07 05:06:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
felipeeugenio (2021-02-07 11:10:35+00:00): Estimado. por favor discutir las categorías de las calles con la comunidad antes de cambiarlas. o por lo menos consultar las convenciones de ésta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98836868
felipeeugenio (2021-02-07 12:56:30+00:00): Estimado.tanto los signos pare como los ceda el paso deben is cacompañados por direction=backward/forward para indicar en qué sentido afectan en el ruteo. gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98836968
❤️‍🔥 (2021-02-07 07:02:30+00:00): hi, drawing sidewalks parallel to existing streets is only recommended if it's the standard for that region - see  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Regional_conventions

In Auckland/pretty much all of NZ, sidewalks aren't mapped as separate paths (yet?), so if you think this should be changed it probably warrants a discussion first. 

If you want to add details about the sidewalk, residential roads are assumed to have sidewalks on both sides - if this is not the case, you can add `sidewalk=left|right|none` to the road (e.g. https://osm.org/way/7633942)


Also, you added some paths that cross each other but don't join, and some that are disconnected from the rest of the road network. This makes them useless for routing/directions because the algorithm can't find a way to navigate between them.
AucklandEditor (2021-02-07 20:13:55+00:00): I'll fix it later today. Thanks for the advice! I'm a new contributor.
AucklandEditor (2021-02-07 20:14:23+00:00): Thanks for the advice! I'll fix it later today. I'm a new contributor.
❤️‍🔥 (2021-02-07 22:20:17+00:00): 👍 and thanks for taking the time to improve the map!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al