piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-11-16 20:39:35+00:00): Oke.. de BAG importeur zal het verder wel aanpassen. Die pandjes liggen er zo netjes dat ik denk dat niemand wat zal merken. :)
Martin Borsje (2017-11-17 19:26:05+00:00): Ik vond inderdaad geen noodzaak ze te herimporteren :-) Netjes gedaan!
mavl (2018-12-25 21:05:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:15:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ionr (2017-12-12 08:19:23+00:00): Hallo Mannyy, building:part wird meines Wissens nach nur genutzt, wenn das Gebäude als ein komplettes Gebäude nochmal separat erfasst wurde (Relation oder nochmal eigene Linie) und dient eher 3D-Mapping. Schau mal im Wiki dazu. Den Namen "Ponte" würde ich dem Gebäude auch nur geben, wenn "Ponte" komplett das Gebäude ist, also alleinige Nutzung. Dann auch alle Tags von Ponte, was derzeit noch zusätzlich als einzelner Punkt erfasst ist, auf das Gebäude setzen und den Punkt löschen. Jedes Objekt in der Realität existiert immer nur einmal als Objekt in OSM, nie zweimal. Dabei gibt es aber unterschiedliche Darstellungsmöglichkeiten, entweder als Gebäude, oder eben als Punkt, aber nicht beides. Noch eine Empfehlung aus eigener Erfahung: Nutze JOSM, wenns kompliziert wird, der ist vor allem für Relationen wesentlich schöner zu bedienen als iD ;) Viele Grüße
mavl (2018-12-25 19:44:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:26:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Enock4seth (2022-09-24 14:07:13+00:00): Don't just add tags anywhere without understanding what they mean. For example, adding a railway switch to the corner of a building like here https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/5233056634 is useless and false
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
goedegazelle (2017-11-20 12:49:22+00:00): The hearing_aids and the optician have been entered twice, both on the nodes and on the building.
JJIglesias (2017-11-18 00:01:34+00:00): Hi Ebony. This Orchards & Scrub that you marked are wrong, they are indeed Trees no holes in the wood. I don't know exactly the specie but they are pink/yellow in color.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:23:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:49:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:50:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:11:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-16 17:18:25+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location!
— copy from a communication with other users—
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.

I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.

Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits.
—end of communication —
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:07:44+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
Glassman (2018-06-09 23:44:43+00:00): Please don't vandalize OSM. Only features that can be verified should be added.
Glassman (2018-06-09 23:47:42+00:00): reverted
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:07:37+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:54:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:07:29+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:42:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Glassman (2017-11-16 20:07:31+00:00): The BLM does own land where you added the recreation site, but's its not listed as a park.  You could make it landuse=public, and label it as BLM lands. See http://gis.co.kittitas.wa.us/compas/default.aspx for ownership of the land. Also look up landuse in wiki.openstreetmap.org
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:30:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:07:22+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:19:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:46:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-11-23 22:11:45+00:00): Você está duplicando umas coisas tipo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541086004
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-11-23 22:17:42+00:00): Esta rodovia ficou toda desconectada e não alinhada. Olha só: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-46.06539&lat=-17.06019&zoom=14&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-11-26 13:04:48+00:00): Corrigi esta parte: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530911879
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-11-26 13:05:00+00:00): Por favor, pare de duplicar as coisas.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:57:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:07:14+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
JJIglesias (2017-11-17 23:51:51+00:00): Nice Job... Thanks
Glassman (2017-11-18 16:04:42+00:00): this should have been from my Glassman user name
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:58:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:07:08+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:07:01+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:19:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:40:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:06:54+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:40:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:06:46+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.
user_5359 (2017-11-17 15:06:38+00:00): Hello! The last edits from user of your company was be deleted because there isn’t any physical location! 
— copy from a communication with other users— 
As far as I can tell, the edits were pure advertising for an online business with no physical presence.
I drive past one of the supposed locations on a regular basis. The building they placed the node on is a government office, and everything else in the area is either governmental, or is a private residence. I checked the aerial imagery for a number of other locations, and they appeared to have similar issues: empty fields, or housing developments, or other clearly-not-a-business situations. I also checked the website being linked to, and didn't see mention of physical locations.
Since this did not appear to be a misguided attempt to map a business, I deleted the edits. 
—end of communication — 
I will revert all your change sets until you add existing addresses.