piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nzau (2022-11-10 07:43:38+00:00): Bonjour David,

Je comptais effectivement remettre les bons tags sur ce que j'ai déjà modifier mais n'hésiter pas à m'aider si tu as le temps.

Et pour les noms officiel je comptais juste laisser 'voie verte/cyclable' suivit du nom de la route en parallèle, cela me semble être la façon la plus officielle de nommer ces voies vertes.
Et je pensais également mettre en 'loc_name' les voie verte nommé par leur destination.
Sinon merci de m'expliquer pourquoi cela ne vas pas plus en détail.
divaddivag (2022-11-11 09:50:59+00:00): Pourquoi chercher à nommer ce qui n'a pas de nom? C'est le cas d'une grande partie de la voirie. Les noms dans OSM sont vérifiables sur le terrain (plaque de rue, plans de ville etc...) ou émanent de documents officiels comme des arrêtés municipaux ou des brochures/topos touristiques par ex. Pour les voies vertes j'en connais 2 dans le 14: VV de la Suisse Normande et de la Liberté. Ces noms ne sont pas spécifiques à OSM puisque tu les retrouves ailleurs comme la carto IGN ou le cadastre (fiabilité douteuse!) mais aussi dans les systèmes d'information des services de secours. Les noms invérifiables, fantaisistes et  non 'sourcables' sont très pénibles et in fine nuisent à la crédibilité d'OSM. A ce titre, Google Maps n'est pas une référence (au contraire!). loc_name ne me semble pas adapté à ce que tu veux mettre en œuvre, il faut aller chercher du coté des tags type 'destination'. Je ne suis pas expert sur ce sujet et pas sur non plus de la façon dont cela peut être exploités par les applis/services basés sur OSM donc je t'invite à en discuter sur le telegram ou sur le forum. Les gens de CartOCité ou Géovélo y passent mais aussi des contributeurs de la France, ce qui est une bonne chose pour mettre en oeuvre des pratiques partagées. 

Au plaisir

 David
Nzau (2022-11-12 09:13:47+00:00): Très bien je me contenterais des tags de destination même si je trouve bien dommage le manque de nom sur toute ces infrastructures.
Merci.
literan (2022-10-25 17:02:16+00:00): привет, здесь какая-то странная штука получилась:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42221146#map=17/55.79376/37.52758
Friendly_Ghost (2023-05-15 16:38:18+00:00): Hoi Kogacarlo,

Waarom heb je een duplicaat gemaakt van https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951750296 ?
Kogacarlo (2023-06-09 09:46:00+00:00): Omdat de grachten bij het fort hoorden. Ik zie trouwens dat op het bastion nauwelijks landuse is en dat sommige taludlijnen verkeerdom staan. Ik pak dat binnenkort wel aan. Gr Carlo
Friendly_Ghost (2023-06-09 10:04:31+00:00): Beter dan dubbelop mappen is dan om de polygoon te vervangen. Dan kun je ook de tags meenemen en de "Stelling van Amsterdam" relatie op de nieuwe polygoon zetten.
Kogacarlo (2023-06-09 12:23:24+00:00): Ik zal de polygoon die in de Stelling zit "expanderen" naar de nieuwe vorm. De historie blijft dan behouden. Grts.
HirschKauz (2022-11-04 08:39:00+00:00): Hi Sascha112 und willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe mir erlaubt kleine Nachbesserungen zu machen: 
Das Gebäude einer Feruerwache braucht trotzdem ein buiding-Tag (in diesem fall eben building=fire_station. Das Areal einer Feuerwache bekommt amenity=fire_station. 
Schau auch gerne im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station 
Grüße uns weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128015162
SKinTO (2023-10-16 13:01:39+00:00): Building (55 Sudbury) has not been demolished, it is heritage/protected. An adjacent building at 99 Sudbury has been demolished for the construction of a new passenger station on the rail line.
Nate Wessel (2023-10-16 23:07:00+00:00): Well I'll be! I hadn't seen any indication of this plan on the site, but it does look like that could be a new stop location
https://www.metrolinx.com/en/projects-and-programs/kitchener-line-go-expansion
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 23:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128017175 where the changeset comment is: : Reverting some fictional edits. See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10600391 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6485 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 23:07:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128017175 where the changeset comment is: : Reverting some fictional edits. See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10600391 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6485 .
literan (2022-10-25 17:00:40+00:00): тег office=research тут лишщний (он уже стоит на всей территории института). поправлю
anastasia_ (2022-10-25 20:10:47+00:00): Спасибо! Не убрала его, когда адресацию дала
NieWnen (2022-10-25 11:38:05+00:00): Ta ścieżka została dziwnie otagowana. Czy jesteś w stanie powiedzieć jak jest dokładnie oznakowana?

Czy jest to DDR (C-13) z dopuszczeniem ruchu rowerowego? 

Czy może jest to ścieżka pieszo-rowerowa oznakowana (C-13/C-16) i jeśli tak, to czy jest podział na część pieszych rowerzystów?
NieWnen (2022-10-25 11:38:27+00:00): *z dopuszczeniem ruchu pieszego w tym pierwszym miało być :)
mlask (2022-10-25 11:48:52+00:00): Finalnie droga nie posiada jeszcze oznakowania w żadnej formie, ale też nie jest wyłączona z ruchu.
Docelowo, wg planów ma tam być DDR + chodnik, ale ponieważ zrobione jest to w formie jednej jezdni asfaltowej to pewnie będzie „z dopuszczeniem” - albo pieszych, albo rowerów :)

https://zdm.waw.pl/aktualnosci/bedzie-bezpieczniej-na-klobuckiej/
NieWnen (2022-10-25 12:01:07+00:00): > Finalnie droga nie posiada jeszcze oznakowania w żadnej formie, ale też nie jest wyłączona z ruchu.

To ja bym dał highway=path (+ew. surface) tymczasowo (zezwala zarówno na ruch pieszych i rowerzystów).

A potem to już zależnie od oznakowania. Na wiki jest ładnie rozpisane:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery

Jeśli to będzie ścieżka pieszo-rowerowa to S5/S7 (z naciskiem na highway=path).
mlask (2022-10-25 12:08:41+00:00): W takim razie poprawione w #128037075. Dzięki za podpowiedzi :)
NieWnen (2022-10-25 11:51:55+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za zmiany i dodanie nowej ścieżki.

Drobna uwagi: nazwy są ogólnie zbędne na takich obiektach, bo wynikają bezpośrednio z tagowania.

Część tagów również tutaj była zbędna np. highway=footway wyznacza dostęp dla pieszych, więc foot=yes jest zbędne.

Ścieżka powinna też przecinać się możliwe z innymi ścieżkami jeśli da się da się przedostać z 1 na 2 w tym przypadku ta nieutwardzona.

Zrobiłem drobną korektę.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
highflyer74 (2022-10-26 05:48:22+00:00): Hello!

Please do not add names to taxiways. Taxiways only carry ref=* (which was correctly tagged before).

Please be so kind to read the wiki before doing any more edits to Bremen airport. Thank you!
kapazao (2022-10-26 12:18:49+00:00): Hola, este tipo de comentarios no son adecuados para indicar lo que estás haciendo en el conjunto de cambios (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_prácticas_en_España#Changesets_o_conjunto_de_cambios).
Si tienes dudas acerca de ediciones, deberías revisar la wiki de OSM España, dejar una nota en el editor iD (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Notas) o entrar al grupo de Telegram de OSM España @OSMes.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128016369
ivanbranco (2022-11-03 11:42:24+00:00): Ciao fayor, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10127107222
penso che qualcosa sia andato storto perché il codice 20502 appartiene a un benzinaio di Fiano Romano (questo qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5851843117 )

questo invece
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10131351404
ha il ref:mise che appartiene a questo benzinaio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8381669338

e questo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1349281644
ha il ref:mise di un benzinaio di San Gregorio di Catania: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/228188120

Riesci a dargli un'occhiata?
highflyer74 (2022-10-25 06:37:19+00:00): Moin!

Neugier: Was ist denn an dieser Stelle das Problem gewesen? Aktuell ist das Gebäude wieder ein building=yes. Vorher war es als Hangar gemappt.

Gruss aus dem Bremer Osten!
impiaaa (2022-10-25 19:11:52+00:00): Hello! Please remember to save your changes in one area before moving to another, to keep changeset boxes to a reasonable size. Thanks!
kapazao (2022-10-26 12:13:09+00:00): Hola, highway=pedestrian se usa para calles peatonales con una cierta importacia y habitualmente con nombre propio. Para el tipo de caminos que estás añadiendo en parques deberías usar highway=footway.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128016819
oba510 (2022-10-25 08:19:17+00:00): Hi, I'm wondering what the source you're using for these maxspeeds is?  I tried looking for a reliable source for the speeds a while ago and couldn't find anything useful.  Some of the ones you added here don't look right (like through stations, where it should be closer to 30-something mph).

You added the role "forward' in a few route relations which is not correct.  Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dsubway and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bay_Area_Rapid_Transit#Tagging_Conventions .  All the BART routes are basically up-to-date at the moment.

Also, you seem to have somehow accidentally copied the note "Drawn from Bing imagery when tunnel was an open trench." all over the place in this changeset and the other one.
OrdinaryScarlett (2022-10-25 08:45:53+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the comment! My sincere apologies for the mistakes and unsourced edits. Please feel free to revert/change them.
Eman_Mehrez (2022-10-25 09:40:51+00:00): Hello rojaselm;
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, Please be aware you added streets without any tags, and it overlapped with streets that already exist and changed the information value in "Al Uoroba Highway" to an unknown value.
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106715318
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101156319
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106715314
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106714536
I fixed this issue.
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
kapazao (2022-10-26 12:10:06+00:00): Hola, en cuanto a los aparcamientos al lado de la calle, deberías revisar parking=street_side (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:parking=street_side) y añadirlo para que esté correcto.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128017004
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-25 13:47:47+00:00): edição revertida. usuário renomeou a área de proteção incorretamente.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 23:07:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 128015209, 128015235, 128015467.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-27 19:57:14+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3556605 ?
Leno$M (2022-10-24 23:20:35+00:00): Este conjunto de cambios fué creado para dar a conocer una problemática que atraviesa esta escuela. Por favor, colabore con la Escuela Secundaria Lopez Jordan en el siguiente Link: https://chng.it/8qnFh7M7JK
user_5359 (2022-10-25 08:48:32+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1106715251. What is the meaning of the tags
Asmt_Roll = 2023 Spring Preliminary Assessment Roll
Asmt_Rpt_Url = https://www.gov.mb.ca/mao/public/summary.aspx?lang=EN&extrct_prop_id=22317588&roll_id=34178&tax_year=2023&extr_typ_ind=R&src=gis
Dwelling_Units = 1
Frontage_or_Area = 152 ACRES
Muni_Name_With_Typ = WHITEMOUTH (RM)
Municipality = 203 - RM OF WHITEMOUTH
OBJECTID = 221347
Property_Address = 58136 Boulder RD
Roll_No = 10600
Roll_No_Txt = 10600.000
SHAPE_Area = 7.78450256318845e-05
SHAPE_Length = 0.0408695272966046
Total_Value = $288,500
?
Please use only OSM keys!
Brummelwuff (2022-10-25 11:51:37+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Änderungen. Du hast in der Nähe von Sprakel einen Fluss hinzugefügt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106716596 
Mir scheint das eher ein Wassergraben zu sein also waterway=ditch
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128017464
Adikso (2022-10-25 00:27:23+00:00): Teraz zrobiłeś/aś, że zarówno teren jak i budynek ma nazwę, przez co dwa razy się pokazuje w wyszukiwarkach.
MJabK (2022-10-25 08:19:20+00:00): Dzięki, usunąłem nazwę z poziomu budynku w takim razie
Frans S (2022-10-25 12:49:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not completed. You did not add tags to the traces you mapped
Each mapping needs to be tagged like highway=unclassified, or highway=path
Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/

Tips 
Connect nodes of highways to each other to achieve a road network which can be used by satellite navigation systems. (these cannot deal with a gap between 2 pieces of roads)

Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.
Tagging of highways:
 
 African countries:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries

Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128017690
Frans S (2022-10-25 11:51:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Just 1 comment. See attached picture.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18kiuIyhg0h9aW2lm3xLyRgBBh8wfgDoe/view?usp=sharing
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128017854
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-25 13:48:01+00:00): edição revertida: usuário criou uma via sobre a outra.
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 03:47:54+00:00): This edit has been reverted.  Please do not change valid and correct water to golf schemes when it is not correct.  Specifically Lake Livingston.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132906475
ralley (2022-10-26 19:32:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits, looks good except please don't use the name field for generic names like "house" it is reserved for proer names only https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things.  In this case replacing building=yes with building=house would be appropriate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128018642
MxxCon (2022-10-25 05:01:47+00:00): Hello.
Please split up your changesets into smaller geographic regions. That makes it easier to review them and doesn't needlessly notify people in unaffected areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128019045
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-09 15:03:02+00:00): Hi, you have created a lot of broken admin boundaries. Can you please fix them? I have found these:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14699517

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14708951

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14708964

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14709329

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14719153

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14747347

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6601485

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14713101
FJili (2022-10-26 08:13:23+00:00): 您好，方便的话可以请您多写一点改了什么地方吗，比如说"青岛炼油"之类的
tastrax (2022-10-25 10:10:04+00:00): Nothing wrong with your edit. It just takes time to appear. You can use Ctrl - Shift - R to refresh the tiles. You may need to do this at each zoom level. In a few hours it will be fine and everyone will see it.
Tom Brennan (2024-02-26 21:23:10+00:00): Perrys Track now has a long section tagged as bridge=viaduct. I assume you were only trying to put the bridge on this short section: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106738714/ ?
Warin61 (2026-02-20 23:26:13+00:00): This is NOT the way to make multipolygon relations!
mcconner22 (2022-10-25 03:50:48+00:00): There are other  missing trails as can be seen on the trail map here: https://wvstateparks.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/PipestemResortStatePark_brochure_map-1.pdf

The River Trail & County Line Trails are the only ones I had a GPS trace for though.
Anil Basnet (2022-10-26 05:15:43+00:00): Wrong mapping overlapping buildings.
paunofu (2022-10-28 09:15:33+00:00): Bon dia, 

és millor tindre-ho tot en nodes separats, ja que tens més informació. Encara que no és incorrecte mapejar-ho en un mateix node si que és incorrecte passar del micromapeig a un sol node.

Salutacions, Pau.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128020836
tonyf1 (2022-11-15 05:04:37+00:00): Hi, in general you don't need bicycle=yes/no unless bikes are being treated differently from other forms, for example in 28065299 access=private is probably all that needs be said.
Mashin (2022-10-25 07:03:31+00:00): Thanks for contributing. Though house number indeed goes into `addr:housenumber` tag as it was before.
paunofu (2022-10-28 09:22:08+00:00): Bon dia, 
abans de suprimir un node duplicat és millor fusionar els dos elements per a no perdre informació.

Salutacions, Pau.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128021193
Warin61 (2022-10-25 23:05:53+00:00): Hi,

The DCS Imagery has beeter resolution than the Bing Imagery, so I'd use that in preference to Bing.

Relation  	14728687 has an error, the outer ways cannot touch. As a house it would be one structure so should have a simple single way. If you want to indicate the separate roof structures that would be entered as 'building:part=roof layer=1 roof:shape=* roof:colour=* 
roof:material=* 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

-----------------------------
I have left the bad relation for you to fix... if you need help, ask.
mavl (2022-10-26 13:53:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем вы делите дороги на фрагменты длиной всего в несколько метров?
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 14:18:16+00:00): your mapping is good 
please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128021418
HellMap (2022-10-25 09:43:28+00:00): Hi!

Is this really a park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106749103 ? There's a fence drawn in the middle of it. And these https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106749092 as well? These are tiny and look to be within private property.

For nodes like these https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10127430732 I think you meant to add `natural=tree`, not `wood` (which means a forest).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:53:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
aceman444 (2025-11-22 11:57:44+00:00): Zdravim, co su tie cisla v znackach 'ref', ktore ste pridali na zastavkach v Kvetoslavove?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 18:50:24+00:00): why you deleted building inside Bosque Real II?https://osmcha.org/changesets/128022536/
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 14:17:21+00:00): your mapping is good
please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128022994
eggie (2022-10-25 07:48:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-15 03:15:26+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3643222 ?
literan (2022-10-25 17:20:58+00:00): и здесь дубль
literan (2022-10-25 16:56:57+00:00): и здесь тоже дубли заправок. Не понимаю, зачем? Откачу.
literan (2022-10-25 16:56:13+00:00): вы здесь дубль заправки сделали. Отменю
literan (2022-10-25 17:18:48+00:00): и здесь дубль зачем-то
ma-rt-in (2022-10-25 07:39:10+00:00): Hey,

Bitte formuliere deinen Änderungssatz aus, daß macht es einfacher Änderungen nachzuvollziehen.

Vg
eggie (2022-10-25 07:53:55+00:00): Tag xLynxh


Das Wasser hat doch nicht den Namen Teich?
Gruss
eggie
Mykolas Mickus (2022-11-15 13:11:20+00:00): Sveiki. Man regis, kad po atnaujinimo relation:14061881 tapo nevalidi. Prieš pakeitimus, apsisukti nebuvo leidžiama iš Jonavos g. (990148611) į Jonavos g. (990148611). Toks žymėjimas atrodo teisingas. Bet dabar apsisukti neleidžiama važiuojant iš Jonavos g. (990148611) į  Jonavos g. (990148615) . Problema tame, kad naujasis variantas apibrėžia važiavimą tiesiai.
Galbūt norėjot apsisukimą uždrausti važiuojant abejomis kryptimis? Tokiu atveju, man regis, reikėtų sukuti tiesiog antrą no_u_turn apribojimą su from = to = 990148615.
Aurimas Fišeras (2022-11-15 19:54:03+00:00): Sveiki.
> Prieš pakeitimus, apsisukti nebuvo leidžiama iš Jonavos g. (990148611) į Jonavos g. (990148611). Toks žymėjimas atrodo teisingas. 
JOSM validatorius apie tokį atvejį įspėja. Viki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction irgi rašo, kad pagrinde „from“ ir „to“ keliai turėtų skirtis.

> Bet dabar apsisukti neleidžiama važiuojant iš Jonavos g. (990148611) į Jonavos g. (990148615) .
Taip, juk dauguma posūkių apribojimų taip ir aprašyti – važiuojant iš kelio „from“ į kelią „to“ negalima/galima sukti taške „via“?

> Problema tame, kad naujasis variantas apibrėžia važiavimą tiesiai.
Pasigilinau, bet man taip ir neaišku, kuris variantas yra teisingas.
OSM Restriction Validator klaidos nerodo abiem atvejais: https://morbz.github.io/restriction-validator/#18/54.90613/23.90149

> Galbūt norėjot apsisukimą uždrausti važiuojant abejomis kryptimis?
Ne, važiuojant iš ŠR į PV sukti į kairę galima, apsisukimo draudimo nėra, tai apsisukti galima.
O važiuojant iš PV į ŠR galima tik sukti į dešinę.

Man apskritai atrodo, kad tokioje vietoje, kur visai nėra posūkio į kairę, no_u_turn apribojimas apskritai nereikalingas, nes kitaip juos tektų dėlioti ant kiekvienos kelio atkarpų sandūros, pvz., čia https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3269034819
Mykolas Mickus (2022-11-18 16:01:34+00:00): Sprendžiant iš šios diskusijos, aiškaus sutarimo kaip ir nėra:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527
Bet aš linkęs sutikti su tais, kurie sako, jog to = from no_u_turn apribojimas yra galimas, jei yra fiziniai ženklai gatvėj. Tik aš dabar nepamenu, ar šioj konkrečioj sankryžoj yra apsisukimą draudžiantys ženklai, ar ne.
Aurimas Fišeras (2022-11-18 16:21:27+00:00): Važiuojant į PV bent jau 2021 m. nebuvo https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.90642214&lng=23.901190896&z=17&pKey=606573266969449&dateFrom=2021-01-01&focus=photo&x=0.4346243224599466&y=0.5682549093351575&zoom=0
Važiuojant į ŠR nėra net posūkio į kairę.
ygcgjp5 (2022-11-18 16:45:54+00:00): Kartaview patikrinkit, turėtų būti naujesnės nuotraukos