piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
carlotta4th (2018-02-21 21:15:56+00:00): That link lists two different ways to list sidewalks (either as included as a tag in the road itself or separately like I have) so that's already a bit confusing why they would have two different ways to do it--but also the link they provide as an example of sidewalks (Washington Capitol Hill https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/38.89133/-77.02059 ) seems to look how I've already mapped them out, with the main difference being that the sidewalks cross and connect to roads (as you described). ...But isn't that an odd way to map? I understand that path navigation software can do things easier if they're all connected, but one thing I saw over and over when I first started mapping over a year ago was "avoid connecting shapes since that makes them hard to move later" and "do not map anything that isn't actually there."

When a crosswalk exists I make sure to map it out but 90% of the streets in this area are just residential and don't have any crosswalks. Wouldn't adding them be "creating things that aren't there" and making it harder to move things in the future with unnecessary connections?
Constable (2018-02-22 08:59:07+00:00): Hi there, yeah, those two methods of mapping sidewalks work as well with cycleways. If you look at the osm help forum website you should find some discussions about the whole sidewalk thing, I mean, someone likes to have sidewalks on the map, someone else find them useless and reckon them as a problem as they contribute to clog the map render (there should have been a never-ending discussion about that on the talk mailing list in the last few years). I think those sidewalks in Washington are well done, any decent routing service for pedestrian should be able to show a sidewalks only route as they all look well connected to the road network around them, which is definitely a nice thing.
About the "avoid connecting shapes since that makes them hard to move later" and "do not map anything that isn't actually there". Well, the second one is the golden rule, we have to add only real objects, end of the story. Sidewalks are real, so you could decide to add them to the map, zebra crossing and stuff like that are real as well, so you should connect those sidewalks when they do cross a road. The first one instead sounds to me a bit generic ad likely to be misinterpreted. I mean, when talking about areas/shapes I do tend to agree, but talking about ways I do definitely disagree (roads, trails, sidewalks, rivers are all “ways”, buildings, lakes, pitches, parks,… are almost always “areas”). Connecting roads at junctions/crossings is another golden rule, the same works for trails, rivers, sidewalks,... (we have specific crossing tags, see the highway=crossing wiki page). I’m pretty sure that “avoid connecting shapes since that makes them hard to move later” refers to elements like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414033716, which doesn’t share its boundary nodes with the roads running around it. Connecting it wouldn’t be correct for multiple reason, I do agree with that then.
Constable (2018-02-22 09:09:28+00:00): I forgot to answer your last question. Well, look at this point on the aerial imagery https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5417574482
I'm pretty sure the sidewalks here allows pedestrians to walk down on the road, there's no grass separating the sidewalk from the road, I do tend to think that engineers designing that sidewalk built it so that people can cross the road here, am I wrong? I'm from Europe and I'm not very familiar with US sidewalks, so I might be wrong.
Do you live here? do you use those sidewalks? when you find yourself at that point what do you do if you have to go south along 320?

When I first wrote you (few days ago) I wasn't actually talking about this crossing like the one with Brunley Court, I was talking about those near the church instead:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442620337 and the other two just south of the church.
Those three have to be connected with those service roads going into the parking lot.
Thanks for your help!
carlotta4th (2018-02-28 17:54:22+00:00): Yeah, it's kind of tricky. Most of the residential areas have kind of "implied" crossing points, but rarely explicit sidewalk or crosswalks unless it's a busy enough street to warrant it. I make sure to mark crosswalks when they're there, of course, but I'm not sure if I should be making crossings where there technically aren't any just so the map system is "connected." 

But as for sidewalks crossing driveways/ parking aisles/etc, I see what you mean now and I'll try to make sure to connect those from now on. It may take me a while to fix this area in that regard due to irl stuff but I'll try to get that adjusted over time. Thanks for the input!
wille (2018-02-17 11:37:47+00:00): Olá, Anderson!

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. 

Essa área que você mapeou nesse changeset não é um parque, assim está mapeado errado. Nós não temos tags para complexo viário ou conjunto de viadutos, assim não podemos mapear isso, apenas cada viaduto individualmente.

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56429567
wille (2018-02-17 12:15:49+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e apenas achei um pequeno erro: você deletou um seamark. apesar de não ser vísivel nas imagens de satélite, é uma informação importante para navegação de barcos. Já desfiz a remoção do objeto que havia sido apagado.

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56429616
felipeeugenio (2023-02-09 12:38:12+00:00): Hola Felipe. Las calles de acceso a la mano del desierto tienen esos nombres? son oficiales?
saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
MCDA (2018-02-17 02:28:58+00:00): The other local paper seems to call the park something else - http://www.impartialreporter.com/news/15651664.Service_of_Dedication_at_Princess_Diana_Cairn/
MCDA (2018-02-17 02:36:57+00:00): Also see the official placenames database for Northern Ireland - http://www.placenamesni.org/resultdetails.php?entry=17103

and the official placenames database for Republic of Ireland - https://www.logainm.ie/en/1411925
MCDA (2018-02-17 03:02:18+00:00): It appears that Transport NI are the source of this new spelling and the Herald is just repeating the information published in this news article - https://www.infrastructure-ni.gov.uk/news/ps55000-resurfacing-scheme-friths-pass-enniskillen
Warin61 (2018-02-17 20:59:17+00:00): Reverted.
This changeset;
 broke relations for St Peters and Alexandria.
displaced Campbell Road from the location given by LPI Imagery. 
It may have had impact on other things.
Constable (2018-02-17 10:22:34+00:00): Hi there Joe, thanks a lot for contributing.
Please next time reply directly below my message, otherwise I do not know if you read my message or not.
That said, people complaining about this is a quite common issue but I'm not sure it has something to do with us, I mean, if in real life that road has a "NO TRESPASSING" sign on its entrance, I do tend to think that people will stay away, even if we show the road on our map, am I wrong? plus, are you (he) sure people were using our map and not Gmaps?
I do really appreciate your help here but please remember to follow the "on the ground rule", we have to map things how they are in real life. This road is likely to have a name, right? what's its name? is it a private road? if so we should add the access=private tag.
Please let me know if I can help further.
Thanks!
have a nice day!
Constable (2018-02-17 10:16:01+00:00): hi there Joe, thanks for your help making things right, you did it, thanks!
Please next time reply to my message, I thought you didn't yet read it.
Have a nice day.
Cheers
joe ceder (2018-02-17 23:03:55+00:00): Your welcome! I'm still learning and did'nt even see this discussion box. In the future I will be sure to respond to these. Thanks for your help.
skyper (2021-06-07 19:30:06+00:00): Salli dddos

Hat der Test funktioniert?
Habe gerade versucht, hier aufzuräumen, aber irgendwie sind da zu viele Objekte und ich kann sie nicht eindeutig zuordnen.
Kannst Du Dir bitte das Gebäude noch einmal anschauen. Vorallem diese drei Objekte:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474028463
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561907269
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561907268

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
dddos (2021-06-13 14:36:55+00:00): Hallo Skyper,
ja - der Test hatte funktioniert, wäre aber noch optimierbar gewesen. Habe nach Systemwechsel nur noch OSM-Buildings auf dem Schirm: haben wir aktuell Besseres, um die Darstellung zu prüfen? Habe den Eindruck, dass nach meinen letzten Änderungen einige Geometrien erheblich verschlimmbessert wurden...
Gruß 
dddos
dddos (2021-06-13 15:03:45+00:00): sorry - ich war voreilig. f4maps sollte die Details zeigen. Aber auch da tauchen die Verschlimmbesserungen auf.
Gruß
dddos
skyper (2021-06-14 11:57:41+00:00): Hey ddos
Mit 3D-Gebäuden habe ich mich bissher nur wenig beschäftigt, daher kann ich Dir da nicht weiterhelfen. Vielleicht hilft ja ein Plugin (kenzi3D)?
Kannst ja versuchen die Änderungen Stück für Stück (von jung nach alt) zurückzusetzen, bzw. gibt es bei Overpass eine Option Daten von einem bestimmten Datum zu laden.
In Maps4BW sind mittlerweile mehr Gebäudeteile enthalten, aber die genaue Zuordnung ist nicht immer einfach.
Grundsätzlich wird leider häufig nicht auf alle Merkmale geachtet und sich zu wenig mit komplexeren Tagging-Schema beschäftigt, daher wohl auch die Verschlimmbesserungen.
Das ehemalige Postgebäude an der Berliner Allee / Sundgauallee ist auch völlig kaputt.
VG skyper
user_5359 (2018-02-17 06:20:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
Please notice I move the information from the node to park area (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560209837).
chnav (2018-02-17 11:27:38+00:00): Пожалуйста не хулиганьте на карте.
yasunari (2018-02-18 08:04:36+00:00): 地理院標準地図を使った場合は、
source = GSImaps/std
としてください。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:GSImaps
Palolo (2022-12-14 00:50:07+00:00): What sort of feature is the "DLDM PHARMACY"? You have tags for seven different types of features. Also values should not have all upper case letters.
viloan (2018-02-17 04:11:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
sergeybe (2018-02-17 05:20:56+00:00): Зачем дубли делаете? Уже есть точки на карте? У вас все в порядке?
mike140 (2018-02-17 07:38:02+00:00): После Ваших правок граница Ровенской области оказалась разорванной в нескольких местах
Yury Yatsynovich (2018-02-17 13:57:34+00:00): Прошу прощения, исправлю.
Yury Yatsynovich (2018-02-17 15:09:26+00:00): Исправил
user_6110846 (2018-03-09 20:54:46+00:00): Добрый вечер  вам совет на будущее     разбивайте подобные правки на несколько   Если вы рисуете большие полигоны или работаете с полигонами админ единиц начиная с сельсоветов и выше  не бойтесь сохранять работу не доделанно й а доделывать  ее в следущей правке .  Также  не беритесь  сразу за админ границы несколько нас пунктов или все вмест е   в одно й правке  Постепенная шаг за шагом работа дасть по результатам лучший результат    .     Требований впихнут все что вы хотите сделат ь в 1 правку   нет
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56431710
user_6110846 (2018-03-09 21:00:38+00:00): Второе замечание    

Белорусски й кадастр не предоставлял лицензию  или   разрешения  для нашего проекта . Рисуя по кадастру вы нарушаете    основное правило  --    мы используем только те источники , которые предоставили разрешение на использование информации .
Yury Yatsynovich (2018-03-09 21:57:40+00:00): Добрый день!
Да, действительно, кадастр не предоставлял данные для проекта, но я использовал не сам кадастр, а постановления райисполкомов, которые являются решениями местных органов управления, публикуются в открытом доступе на сайте pravo.by и как законодательные акты не подподают под авторское право
sergeybe (2018-02-17 05:45:14+00:00): Прочитайте как правильно оформляются имена в тегах OSM. С вам все в порядке? Может вам нужна помощь?
eggie (2018-02-17 07:29:26+00:00): Dag Angelie,  Je kunt hier http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56432002 heel goed zien dat je pad aan de westzijde eindigt op de grens van de landuse=grass. Het zit dus niet vast aan de Heidepolweg en zal dan ook niet routeren. Dus goed inzoomen. Je kunt ook aan de groote van je editgebied zien dat je iets verkeerd hebt geplakt.
eggie (2018-02-17 07:35:26+00:00): Ook het laatste stukje pad heeft geen tag highway=footway. Het heeft helemaal geen tags en zal dus ook niet renderen.
eggie (2018-02-17 07:48:21+00:00): pad laten aansluiten op weg, gecombineerd en omgetagd naar highwway=path  Alleen als er het bekende blauwe bord met de wandelaar staat is iets een footway. Is dat hier het geval?
Angelie Witjes (2018-02-17 23:28:43+00:00): Het bekende blauw bord met de wandelaar? Ik begrijp niet wat je bedoelt. Waar moet dat staan?
Dit is een bestaand pad dat niet op de OSM staat en ook niet op de topografische kaart, vandaar dat ik het wil toevoegen.
Ik ga kijken of dat alsnog lukt.
eggie (2018-02-18 07:53:19+00:00): Ik heb het al verbeterd. Dus hier hoef je niets te doen. :)
Het is zo dat wandelpaden worden aangeduid met verkeersbord G7. 
Dat staat wel of niet aan het begin van een "wandelpad".
We taggen dan highway=footway. Staat het bord er niet dan is het highway=path.
Dat is wel een pad, maar geen wandelpad. 
Mogen er daar geen tweewielers komen dan tag je erbij vehicle=no
eggie (2018-02-18 07:54:31+00:00): Zie Wikipedia
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voetpad
Angelie Witjes (2018-02-18 20:23:08+00:00): Dank je wel voor het verbeteren Eggie
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-19 04:28:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56479481 where the changeset comment is: Liberty Parkway is the official name of this segment.
user_5359 (2018-02-17 07:32:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
user_5359 (2018-02-17 07:34:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
audtr (2023-06-16 20:20:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3737233
Tantri IRM-ED (2023-01-12 07:47:09+00:00): Hello andi9876
thank you for contributing to adding data in OSM!
I'm currently doing remote mapping to validate the existing rail network in Cambodia.
i need your help especially for railroads (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/561350565)
i see in the history of osm that you added the railway crossing with the highway but the railway is not visible in any imagery (12.959098449999999,103.1324896). do you know if the railway tracks are still there or have they disappeared? is there any other information that you can explain?

I really appreciate any information you provide.
thank you
andi9876 (2023-01-12 09:29:06+00:00): Hi,
last review was 3 days ago.

https://goo.gl/maps/w1S9GKMaK8CnSoL49
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-17 17:31:21+00:00): Hi mecaro, welcome to OSM.

Starting with this changeset, you created almost 650 Changesets with zero map changes within 5 minutes. I think something is not correct here. 

Any ideas? Thanks.
mecaro (2018-02-17 18:27:43+00:00): I used Go Map editor and something was going wrong on saving process... The editor freezing on this step. Sorry
Constable (2018-02-17 18:27:42+00:00): hi there, thanks for contributing, where did you get those names from?
MisterPhilip (2018-02-17 20:56:30+00:00): The County Assessor's website: https://maps.mcassessor.maricopa.gov/ (and local knowledge)
Constable (2018-02-18 16:38:01+00:00): Cool, thanks!
thank you for your help making OSM great (not again) :D
Arma IRM-ED (2020-12-02 05:12:06+00:00): Hi, Martin Sauter. I have adjusted the road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/561943651) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Arma IRM-ED (2020-12-02 05:12:05+00:00): Hi, Martin Sauter. I have adjusted the road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/561944536) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Умар (2018-02-17 08:00:28+00:00): Прошу исправить координаты.

Правильные в статье
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B8-%D0%9B%D0%B0%D0%BC
Arma IRM-ED (2020-12-03 04:39:42+00:00): Hi, Martin Sauter, I have adjusted the road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/561946558) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Arma IRM-ED (2020-12-06 21:07:34+00:00): Hi, Martin Sauter, I have added bridge and adjusted this road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/561946590 based on Maxar Premium Imagery
duck57 (2018-02-18 19:26:02+00:00): Do you think that some of the smaller neighborhoods (namely, the single streets and apartment blocks) should be marked as "place=city_block" and "is_in=<surrounding neighborhood>" (or even "place=plot" if it's a single contiguous apartment complex) or do they function as independent neighborhood units and should retain "place=neighborhood"?

Also, do the official plot maps give an official name to the neighborhood that's by the corner of South & Evening Streets?
nevw (2018-02-23 10:55:06+00:00): Hi
You have renamed Florey Street to Antsey Street but your note says it has been renamed to Antsey Court. 
Can you check which is correct thanks.
nevw (2018-03-07 02:26:52+00:00): I have checked out the streets and fixed now as far as I can see.
BCNorwich (2018-02-17 13:04:16+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reverted your recent changes to OSM. I think you may be unaware that you deleted a lot of artwork POI's from the area. All is now well but please be careful and not upload changes till you're sure of what's happening.

Regards Bernard
usefulness (2018-02-18 07:20:48+00:00): You re doing good Zolanie <3...Keep mapping for Africa. muaaaah
uks (2018-02-17 10:10:04+00:00): Так все-таки, это магазин по продаже стройматериалов или офис по изготовлению строительных лесов (craft=scaffolder)? Если магазин, то надо shop=hardware или что-то похожее
rainerU (2018-02-17 09:41:12+00:00): Tu as créé un POI sur la base d'une note qui est est mal postitionnée. Comme le texte de la note indique, la Boîte à rire se trouve au 115 Avenue du Palais des Exposition à Perpignan.
rainerU (2018-02-17 10:11:47+00:00): La position est correcte. L'adresse semble correcte aussi mais ne correspond à aucune voie à proximité. C'est donc ok mais faudrait vérifier les noms des rues. 
Je corrige le type de POI de shop en amenity=theatre
archie (2018-02-17 11:09:02+00:00): Är det inte lämpligare att tagga som stream istället för river. River är till för väldigt mycket större vattendrag. Det är första gången i varje fall för mig att en river går igenom en golfplats.
Zekjie (2018-02-17 11:26:41+00:00): Absolut. Den var inte byggd hela vägen. Och den befintliga stod som river. Så valde det fortsättningsvis med. Men den får du gärna ändra till stream eller flodbank eller liknande
Aleks-Berlin (2018-02-21 08:20:28+00:00): Hi emvee, why do you add keys like "|" ?
KR, Alex

see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5417982214
emvee (2018-02-21 21:53:49+00:00): Hi Alex,

That was just a typo error I think, I did not notice and JOSM validator did not really hint.

Thanks for fixing it.

Martin.
eggie (2018-02-17 11:04:28+00:00): Dag nederdirk, foot=yes hoeft niet op een wandelpad net als motor_vehicle = no. Kan er af.  Een brug kun je maken door het pad op twee plaatsen te splitsen en dan zet je bridge=yes en layer=1 op dat stukje. surface=compacted moet op dat stukje er wel af.
eggie (2018-02-17 11:10:45+00:00): bicycle=permissive? Wanneer fietsen is toegestaan kun je gewoon bicycle=yes toevoegen.
Permissive zetten we vaak op particulier terrein maar heeft niet zozeer met de routering te maken, maar met de "zeggenschap".
nederdirk (2018-02-17 14:57:43+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback! Van de bruggen zou ik nog even moeten uitzoeken waar ze precies liggen. De overige feedback zal ik direct even verwerken.
eggie (2018-02-17 18:34:11+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor je actie en reactie
aceman444 (2019-10-19 14:22:46+00:00): Zdravim, asi bude potrebne opravit pravidla Vasho bota, lebo napr. tato zmena je uplne zle, tak aby sa to nesirilo po celom Slovensku.
Odstranenie 'building', 'website', 'source', poskodenie 'addr:streetnumber' dufam nie je to co ste planovali.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:29:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
frafra (2018-02-26 15:49:55+00:00): Ciao! Grazie per il contributo, ma attenzione a non trascinare per errore altri punti! :) Provvedo a sistemare.
Ale_Zena_IT (2018-03-16 07:40:12+00:00): Ciao,
la SP121 ha anche un nome vero e proprio?
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-17 17:49:20+00:00): Hi SoraAdios, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56436263
joost schouppe (2018-11-16 21:38:25+00:00): Kan je wat meer uitleg geven bij deze aanpassing?
M!dgard (2018-12-13 16:16:34+00:00): This changeset could not be reverted due to subsequent, conflicting edits.
Hjart (2018-02-17 12:19:51+00:00): Jeg har slettet din ekstra udgave af Tek2 Toys. Der er ikke tale om nogen reel cafe på stedet og heller ikke om nogen "club=boardgames"
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-22 14:09:41+00:00): Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap. Alt, aspetta, hai mischiato un landuse con una via ed un indirizzo?   Ti conviene cancellare i tag ed inserirli correttamente. Ora non ho qui un PC per controllare ma mi sa che hai fatto un po casino... 😂 spero che non mi hai attaccato il landuse alla strada... appena ho tempo controllo. Buon mapping!