piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 11:18:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1359366069/history has building:name = TVRI that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Is building:name for building name? In such case it would be much better to put it into name tag. If this object merges builing and POI inside such as museum or shop, then having separate objects for point of interest and building would be better idea, museum may have own area or node (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ).

If it is an inscription then it should use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription

If that is not a building name - what you wanted express by this tagging?
eggie (2019-10-28 13:22:21+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
sdoerr (2018-12-07 16:00:57+00:00): I'm guessing that the name of way 31106544 is an error. I've changed it to Tawel-fan in accordance with OS Streetview, but retained the earlier name in alt_name just in case I'm wrong.
marc__marc (2021-03-26 12:04:02+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux-dire exactement "map 3rd crawler lane nodes" ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Ted Pottage (2021-03-26 16:19:21+00:00): La quelle(s) sur la liste, svp?
Crawler lane = 3eme pour vehicles leint et PL  - Sorry will have to go back into English... 
On the A28 in Normandy every hill up out of the many valleys has them. This view shows one:
https://showmystreet.com/#tphe3_yg6l_5g.0_-9g42 
It was a note to mark the sections that had them. Perhaps the first mapping was a longer section and got chopped up >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198593899/history 
This one was. I was Edit 13 in 2011:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5452976/history

Hope this explanation helps you in you Tidying Up work.
Best wishes
Ted
H4N5-antw (2022-07-04 10:43:01+00:00): Geachte Lodde1949, 
Mocht toch eens navraag doen : hoe hebt u vastgesteld dat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121528022 een industrial area is, in plaats van bijvoorbeeld de campus van een school voor bijzonder basis en secundair onderwijs?
Road–Runner (2023-07-26 19:47:29+00:00): Hallo. Ist das wirklich ein Flurname.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1360308733#map=21/47.32985/11.44347&layers=C
Map_HeRo (2025-11-13 18:25:42+00:00): Hallo eumiro, du hast in diesem CS über halb Deutschland u.a. am Point Alpha bei Rasdorf in der Rhöne ein dort ausgestelltes Stück Grenzzaun gemappt (way 121544864) und diesem den  Namen "eiserner Vorhang " gegeben. Dann hast Du noch Übersetzungen dieses Namens in 7 andere Sprachen beigefügt.

Vor Ort lässt sich nichts davon verifizieren. Der Zaun ist beschildert als "Mahnmal deutscher Geschichte - Grenzanlagen der ehemaligen DDR". Nichts von "eiserner Vorhang" (der ja etwas ganz anderes bezeichnet als ein Stück Grenzzaun) und schon zweimal nichts von Namen in 7 anderen Sprachen.

Gibt es für diese Namen irgend eine Quelle oder können die weg?

Gruß Mikke
eumiro (2025-11-14 20:39:06+00:00): Nach 14 Jahren kann ich mich nicht mehr genau erinnern. Bitte verbessere die Daten nach deinem besten Wissen und Gewissen. Danke!
Map_HeRo (2025-11-14 20:48:21+00:00): Ok, kein Problem, ich wollte trotzdem der Höflichkeit halber gefragt haben.
Gruß Mikke
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-28 23:31:39+00:00): Can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1251633#map=17/51.74523/-2.72548&layers=N ?
marc__marc (2026-01-30 07:47:00+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121836439
can you review it ?
it's not a squared pipeline, nor a marker,
so i suppose it's a pipeline substation but I don't see it in aerial imagery
Regards,
Marc
Osmwithspace (2022-11-29 11:53:38+00:00): Hallo SoraK_82,

ich würde mal die Tags bei folgendem Punkt löschen. Das ist ja scheinbar überholt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/419804525

Grüße Osmwithspace
SomeoneElse (2016-09-04 22:14:22+00:00): Another one - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121882501 is "building=iy" - any ideas about that?
brianboru (2017-04-17 09:00:10+00:00): finger trouble again -should have been yes, but I've updtaed it to retail
Polyglot (2015-03-23 21:06:05+00:00): Hallo Toeklk, ik vind deze weg niet terug: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121897724. Is het een probleem als ik die verwijder? Jo
user_20554852 (2024-03-29 08:47:21+00:00): Bitte Adresse und PLZ auch Pflegen, oder nachpflegen und nicht nur die hälfte machen...
AndersAndersson (2024-08-23 22:00:14+00:00): Hej!
Gammalt changeset, jag vet. Men jag stötte på lite konstiga taggar på den här vägen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121989067/history

Du vet kanske mer om det är ett misstag eller om det är något jag inte känner till.
leojth (2024-08-23 22:09:01+00:00): Haha, ja, det var länge sen! 😀Det måste vara ett kopieringsfel eller något som kommit med vid en split eller något. Ta bort bara.
*Martin* (2016-02-29 22:07:53+00:00): Ahoj MirecXP. Pre trasu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122056732 mi chyba "raw GPS" podklad. Trasu som presiel aj ja tak by som ju rad spresnil. Bez tvojho GPS ju nacapim iba na svoje.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 16:36:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1365015563/history - to atrapa czy pozostałość prawdziwego samolotu?
OF0 (2018-01-24 15:30:49+00:00): Müsste int_name nicht mit Clubhouse anstatt mit Clubhaus befüllt werden?
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:28:42+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122155453
has no tags. What is it?
eric22 (2017-03-28 19:29:44+00:00): Fixed
TaraV (2019-07-19 08:14:40+00:00): This road is classified as primary, but based on Mapillary images  (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=-37.519621799999996&lng=145.42469149997225&z=20&pKey=5pgY3Ynk6c1SRvCr4lLZlw ) it can be classified as trunk? Should the classification of this road be changed?
Stanblaz (2019-07-21 04:26:04+00:00): G'day, had a look at the Mapillary images and they are of the Melba Highway and about 6+ kilometers away from where my changes were made so I'd say the classification still stands.
Stanblaz (2019-07-21 04:35:12+00:00): I hope this works (haven't used Mapillary before) (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=map&lat=-37.46075017361112&lng=145.39981953777777&z=17&pKey=RHFS-3633308CgOZpaMzYg) is where I made the changes.
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:14:19+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122228486
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2017-08-21 09:58:47+00:00): Removed in changeset 51298168
GerdP (2015-11-09 07:05:59+00:00): please review:
I've changed the rarely used tag
highway=unclassified_link to unclassified
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35104902
Osmwithspace (2022-11-29 11:57:38+00:00): Und das hier wohl eher mit amenity=animal_shelter
animal_shelter=dog;cat ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121654669
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-21 22:39:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1368598277/history has จ=ลำพุน key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
ALu68 (2020-11-04 09:26:56+00:00): Which tags should be used for this area?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122528663#map=8/10.382/115.400
GerdP (2015-11-01 05:36:20+00:00): please review:
the tag indoor=door was later changed to highway=door by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mister-viper
It seems that was all this user ever did.
I am not sure if I like the idea of mapping doors at all, but I am pretty sure that they
are not highway=*. In my eyes,barrier=door matches much better.
The name=* tag seems to mean the room, not the door?
DENelson83 (2020-04-07 09:47:00+00:00): This location does not match the address for this post office in Canada Post's records.  Is this actually a post office, or just a mailbox?
Emre Memiş (2021-01-24 12:37:50+00:00): Burası haritada Aşağıballık olarak kayıt edilmiş fakat yanlış. Bu mahallenin ismi Yukarıballık olması gerek
katpatuka (2021-01-24 13:00:48+00:00): Bildirim için teşekkür ederim ;)

Adı değiştirdim, bugün yarın gözükecek...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-20 07:58:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122682305 - skąd informacja o ich projektowaniu?

Nadal na serio je projektują?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-03 08:34:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1370476910/history has shop = hometextile that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=hometextile ? Is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fabric describing this shop well? Is it intentional that shop=hometextile, was used not shop=fabric? How it differs from it?
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-05-06 09:42:41+00:00): Hi, Willi2006. I deleted this waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/122759350) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you
Gumeg (2016-07-08 08:25:20+00:00): Мне кажется, что здесь не может быть http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:barrier%3Dretaining_wall вокруг храма. Там же обычный металлический забор?
Warin61 (2018-10-11 22:19:56+00:00): Hi,
The nodes with the tag arboretum=yes look like individual trees? Might be better tagged natural=tree - this is for significant trees and I'd take it that is the case if you have tagged them as individuals? 
An arboretum is usually a collection of trees - so an area. That is what has attracted me to the tag you used. But I think arboretum=yes would be a sub tag under another tag and that is not what I want. I think the following might be usefull for arboretums;

landuse=arboretum
and/or
leisure=garden, garden=arboretum
trial (2026-01-03 19:35:59+00:00): Bloavez mad, alors on veut mettre les vieux à la rue ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122883532/history : c'est quoi ce wall=no ? ;-)
trial (2016-08-19 11:29:26+00:00): J'aimerai comprendre : pourquoi supprimer les noms des banques, sans même mettre un brand ou plutôt un opérateur ?
Là je vois que celui du CA a été remis et je vais remttre celui du CMB.
Il est important que si on recherche une banque on puisse la trouver.
Si vous ne souhaitez pas voir les noms des banques sur la carte vous pouvez choisir un style qui ne les affiche pas.
Gumeg (2016-07-08 09:22:49+00:00): На территории больницы highway=living_street? Я бы поставил скорее highway=service, access=private
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-21 04:56:56+00:00): Sorry for question on an ancient edit: but what is the meaning of date=20110715 tag?
AiNikolas (2021-09-21 06:10:06+00:00): Hi Mateusz,
20110715 means July 15th, 2011. I chose machine readable date format in order to indicate on which date this edit was done.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
AiNikolas
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-21 11:16:28+00:00): in that case - would it be OK to remove it?

Date is recorded in edit itself, there is no need to repeat it on objects

And at least https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:date claims  that this tag is used for other purposes
AiNikolas (2021-09-21 11:20:27+00:00): Mateusz,
as noted - edit is old.
My usage of key:date was to indicate clearly and explicitly date of creation of this map part. It was not intended to annoy or whatsoever.

You wish to delete it having better data in any aspect?
Please make it so.
I have no objection at all.

AiNikolas
Gumeg (2016-08-30 14:18:34+00:00): Приветствую.
Откуда у дороги Будёновск-Ачикулак такое название - "Трасса"?
chippy (2015-03-10 17:22:28+00:00): thanks!
glglgl (2016-10-11 11:48:53+00:00): Ich bezweifele ja, dass die Sittersklamm von der Blies aus bewässert wird und in die Quelle entwässert :-P Ich hab sie mal rumgedreht.
ChrissW-R1 (2017-10-19 14:01:52+00:00): Please have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1179201
canfe (2020-11-29 08:49:49+00:00): Cap. la Ör Vergügn (1375765366, v1)
Ritengo che vista la posizione non sia luogo di culto (messa)
Il nome non dovrebbe mai contenere abbreviazioni e.. la lingua?
E' un nome locale o è in tedesco?
Il primo mappatore sembra non più attivo così chiedo a te.
kfj (2020-11-29 09:33:13+00:00): The toponym 'Ör Vergügn' is probably piemontese dialect, most maps (like the recent Val Grande map by Geo4map) and the local signposts name it 'Or Vergugn' without the diacritical marks, so that's probably a better choice for the toponym in OSM.
It is a small chapel, I think the 'place of worship' tag is appropriate - I saw flower offerings and candles in the place, so it seems to be in active use.
canfe (2020-11-30 16:11:47+00:00): Is there an altar?
I think that in order to define that there is worship, the presence of an altar is needed to be able to celebrate Holy Mass.
If this is the case, I would say no.
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fs0.wklcdn.com%2Fimage_86%2F2594913%2F23884351%2F15184335Master.jpg&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fit.wikiloc.com%2Fpercorsi-escursionismo%2Fbignugno-velina-cicogna-bignugno-23884344%2Fphoto-15184335&tbnid=u-q2CMgddHWwiM&vet=12ahUKEwiM043R06rtAhXDuqQKHTW2A7QQMygLegUIARCnAQ..i&docid=g-vVaubVG4qq3M&w=900&h=1600&itg=1&q=%27Or%20Vergugn&ved=2ahUKEwiM043R06rtAhXDuqQKHTW2A7QQMygLegUIARCnAQ

Grazie!
kfj (2020-11-30 17:07:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship says:
All places of worship, independently of the religion or denomination, get the tag amenity=place_of_worship. I would say the tag is appropriate.
canfe (2020-12-01 11:06:50+00:00): It is not a question of religion, but rather of a place "suitable" for worship.
If there is no altar, for Catholic worship, Holy Mass cannot be celebrated and therefore there is no worship.
From the photos it seems only a place of prayer.
kfj (2020-12-02 08:07:07+00:00): If that is so, the tag is probably wrong, because there is indeed no altar. I looked at some chapels in the area, and they are tagged with 'historic=wayside_shrine', combined with 'religion=christian' and 'denomination=catholic'. Do you think that's a good solution?
canfe (2020-12-12 08:22:06+00:00): Optimus!
kfj (2020-12-12 10:20:54+00:00): Okay, I made the change.
Matija Nalis (2023-03-31 23:58:51+00:00):  Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?
rab (2023-04-01 12:11:36+00:00): Whether by merging of something or by intention. I can no longer remember.
ethelmermaid (2015-04-07 21:40:50+00:00): Shouldn't these closures be rendered with temporary tags (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary), since the Østensjøbanen is coming back within a year?
gormur (2015-04-08 10:26:59+00:00): Are you thinking about http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30013005 ? Please comment on the relevant changeset.
kogutowicz-mano (2023-01-19 18:28:16+00:00): Ez pech. :-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3524718
Hjart (2015-06-30 11:54:31+00:00): Can bicycles and walkers pass these blocks? If yes, add bicycle/foot=yes to those nodes
Gumeg (2016-07-08 09:20:55+00:00): Что случилось с этой улицей?? зачем cutting=no embankment=yes?
Gumeg (2016-07-08 09:18:13+00:00): Зачем улицы из residential в track переделывали? См. внимательно про типы дорог на Вики, в документации
pos_ei_don (2015-02-27 07:16:25+00:00): Warum löschst Du Edits von mir, und sersetzt sie mit neuen, eigenen?
Langlaeufer (2021-11-15 13:14:13+00:00): Lange her, aber warum hast du dich für Fußgängerzone entschieden? Das sind normale Parkwege. Und es ist auch innerhalb des Berggartens nicht konsistent.
GerdP (2015-10-31 14:52:04+00:00): please review way 122665503: 
the tag highway=lift is rarely used.
This seems to be a highway=footway,conveying=*
See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying
DiahW IRM-ED (2021-06-07 00:40:41+00:00): Hi, @dbrgn. I deleted this water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/124196829) based on Maxar imagery. Thank you
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 09:55:04+00:00): Hello!

You used
mtb:scale:uphill=-2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83144426/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale:uphill=2-
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Víctor L (2017-02-28 16:54:27+00:00): Las nomenclaturas de los ferrocarriles, tomando como ejemplo el Belgrano es FCGB.
FF.CC. es una abreviatura que se toma para dos palabras separadas que sean plural, por ejemplo:
RRHH: Recursos Humanos.
EEUU: Estados Unidos.
Ferrocarril es una sola palabra (y singular), por lo que es incorrecta esta nomenclatura.
Geogast (2017-03-01 14:18:25+00:00): Ah, bueno saberlo. Y es bueno, que se esté discutiendo esto en el foro, en la discusión nueva
Frans S (2025-11-02 15:58:04+00:00): Hello. 
A request. When you add a highway crossing waterways or crossing a viaduct please add a layer to it. ( 1 of -1 ) I had to add them on nearly every crossing.
Best regards
eggie (2022-08-29 18:18:09+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage.. daarom opnieuw .... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
utack (2017-06-17 14:42:39+00:00): Hi Bornemax,  
eine frage zu  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124432195  
und  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109900858  
Das ist ja eine alte EIntragung, weißt Du gnaz zufällig noch ob es nach aktuellem "surface" wiki ein "fine_gravel", also einer kleiner Rollsplitt ist?  
Ich vermute stark ja, denn "gravel" ist laut Wiki riesen Steine  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Dscf1582-800.jpg  
MfG
Bornemaxx (2017-06-18 07:32:15+00:00): Hallo Utack, 
das ist ja echt schon lange her, aber wenn ich mir das Foto so ansehe, bin ich mir nicht sicher, ob es wirklich dieser Untergrund war.... Wenn ich mal wieder in der Gegend unterwegs bin, werde ich es mal kontrollieren.
Oder Du siehst selbst nach ;-)
Viele Grüße
utack (2017-06-18 10:19:54+00:00): Alles klar, danke.  
Ich schraube grade bisschen mit einem Radrouter rum, und leider ist das gravel für fine_gravel recht oft verwendet  
Ist natürlich ein unterschied ob ich über bisschen kleinen Split rolle oder über gigantische Steinblöcke wo selbst ein MTB stecken bleiben kann
Bornemaxx (2017-06-18 17:44:35+00:00): So, ich habe gleich mal das schöne Wetter genutzt, und einiges korrigiert. Aber ich glaube, "fine_gravel" gibt's noch nicht soooo lange, oder ?
Radrouter kling übrigens ziemlich gut.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-17 09:45:51+00:00): Dzięki za mapowanie szlaków! Wczoraj się przydały na przejażdżce rowerowej.
FiligranFifak (2021-10-18 09:08:34+00:00): :-D
lfemak (2019-07-18 10:14:50+00:00): FYI:
Das scheint aktuell diese Relation zu betreffen:
"Weser - Romantische Straße"
ref=D9
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2013999
shaikh solaiman (2019-09-17 10:11:54+00:00): Hi, here you have drawn an unclassified highway 35.03836095, 139.8269954 (lat:long) where some one has drawn another highway as walkway and many more tag also. as I am a stranger of this area, don't know much about this place, you should check the place to resolve the issue. Thank you. 

Solaiman
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:28:15+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124599945
has no tags. What is it?
eric22 (2017-03-28 19:32:06+00:00): Fixed
Matija Nalis (2023-03-30 19:29:33+00:00): Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here?
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:40:30+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124774199
has no tags. What is it?
DiahW IRM-ED (2022-12-12 05:41:47+00:00): Hi, Geofreund1.

Thanks for your mapping contribution! Your edits look great. But I see there's a new bridge on this road based on the latest Maxar Imagery, where used to be a ford. 

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/124798894

I'm not sure to modify the road segment, because I've only seen the change in the road segment from the satellite imagery. Could you please modify the road segment? Or may I modify the road segment? If you have any other suggestions, please let me know. Thank you.

Kind Regards,
Diah
Geofreund1 (2022-12-13 09:43:54+00:00): Hello Diah,
please feel free to make your edits as required.

Happy mapping
Geofreund1
tyr_asd (2017-02-15 09:27:21+00:00): Hi. Falls du das liest. Ich hätte eine Frage zum Punkt "Der Nolp", den du hier eingetragen hast: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/892732 Würde mich über eine Antwort hier oder im verlinkten OSM-Note sehr freuen!
Marc_ch (2024-07-05 07:39:37+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124802392/history#map=16/46.6002/7.2924
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124802390
vous avez crée 2 routes avec une restriction d'accès "interdit aux voitures sauf cheveaux".
oü se trouve le panneau pour cette restriction ? je ne le trouve pas.
Salutations,
Marc
GerdP (2015-11-13 10:33:11+00:00): please review:
I've replaced the tag
highway=unbuilt by a note
to make sure that routing software is not confused. Do you have further information why you mapped the ways?
E.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124826150
Никифоров (2017-09-09 04:11:43+00:00): переулок Мичуринский
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-14 23:32:56+00:00): Zijn in een nieuwbouwwijk veld- of boswegen?
dvdhoven (2019-11-15 08:53:16+00:00): Reageren op een oeroude changeset is niet zo zinvol.
In nieuwbouwwijken worden de wegen gedurende de bouwfase vaak als onverharde of halfverharde weg aangelegd.
In NL is de tag track in gebruik geraakt voor alle on- en halfverharde wegen, ook die binnen de bebouwde kom, dus wat ruimer dan alleen bos en veld.
Als een nieuwbouwwijk klaar is, kunnen de tracks worden omgetagd naar bijv. residential.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-31 06:41:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1389062964/history has maxspeed = default that was added in this edit
Is it just less-used duplicate of maxspeed=implicit ?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed=implicit and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed=default

Is there any reason to not change to more widely used tag?
dieterdreist (2025-07-31 12:33:57+00:00): yes, this is the same as implicit, maybe 14 years ago it wasn’t clear which tag to use? Can be changed to implicit
dieterdreist (2025-07-31 12:54:02+00:00): fixed it
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-31 20:44:57+00:00): thanks!
eggie (2017-11-20 18:27:11+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Relloz (2022-08-02 12:18:20+00:00): Hallo, 

Du hast am Zusammenfluss Kanal und Loisach (SW von Gelting) ein "waterway=weir" für eine Sohlschwelle im Kanal eingetragen. 

Wäre da nicht ein "waterway=rapids" treffender? 

Ein harmloser Paddler fährt öfter mal über eine Sohlschwelle, eher selten über ein Wehr. 

Gruß Werner
Polarbear (2015-11-29 23:07:17+00:00): Hi, in which scale did you enter the climbing difficulty, e.g. in http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1390787005 ? I would recommend to transfer them into unambiguous values as defined here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:sport%3Dclimbing#Schwierigkeitsbewertungen
Fizzie-DWG (2018-12-01 06:21:04+00:00): Hi. Working through a MapRoulette report on problem one-way streets & it's brought this & it's associated driveways up. Looking at the overhead imagery, they don't appear to be right? Would you please be able to check the layout & confirm or modify as necessary? Thanks
Bunburycatering (2017-02-17 15:56:49+00:00): Edited
mentaken (2018-11-16 10:41:58+00:00): Dag wegspotter, volgens GRB is deze weg de Bullenbergstraat ipv zierbeekseweg(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125505782#map=17/50.85683/4.20315-) Weet jij hier meer over?
wegspotter (2018-11-16 18:53:45+00:00): Het zou om de oude naam kunnen gaan. Zie > http://www.tragewegendilbeek.be/SMB/SMB38.htm 
Ik voeg alt_name=Zierbeekseweg toe en wijzig de naam in de Bullenbergstraat
d1g (2015-11-01 15:28:32+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125307131/history - у этого здания, наверное, лишний layer=7?