piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ds5rUy (2018-04-25 03:46:01+00:00): When "fixing" geometry. You need to take into account the lane attributes if present!

Activate the "lane and road attributes" map style in JOSM to see them.

Especially in cases along a motorway where a merge lane or exit lane temporarily joins, do not simply blindly move the way into the middle of the (temporary increased) lane count. 

The way is not always in the exact middle of the lanes described in the attribute (see placement tag, it's described in detail in the wiki and the lane and road attributes plugin will render it correctly).

It's preferable to keep the way centered in the "original" lanes of the motorway instead of having it weave back and forth every time a lane gets temporarily added for a short stretch.

TIA.
Ds5rUy (2018-04-25 04:05:13+00:00): Also, please keep in mind that imagery is not always correctly aligned. Most of the "fixed" geometry was correct (or at least more correct) when utilizing imagery that had it's offset corrected using additional information (gps tracks, castrate extract, strava heat maps, ...)
hsc666 (2018-05-01 09:48:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58579604 where the changeset comment is: Revert fictional park added to cheat Pokémon Go. Edits on OSM must match the reality on the ground! https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/04/01/tips-pokemon-go-2
shedeki (2018-04-25 12:05:43+00:00): Thanks for splitting them up. Might I asked how you traced the outlines? They don't seem exact.
hsc666 (2018-05-01 09:46:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58579576 where the changeset comment is: Revert fictional park added to cheat Pokémon Go. Edits on OSM must match the reality on the ground! https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/04/01/tips-pokemon-go-2
tux67 (2018-04-25 11:03:24+00:00): Revert of Pokemon Edit w CS 58404408
http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-24 22:10:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58390614 where the changeset comment is: Revert spam. Please read wiki.openstreetmap.org to understand how OSM works. Just adding contact details is not enough. Please also add tags like office=*, shop=* or amenity=*. OSM is not a dump site for spam.
wille (2018-04-26 14:25:14+00:00): Oi, GFDO

O que existe no lugar dessa área que você apagou? Você fez isso apenas por que a área não está mapeada no Google Maps?

Obrigado,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58382710
viloan (2018-04-24 17:54:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
LucFreitas (2018-04-25 19:44:56+00:00): Olá. As geometrias da biblioteca que foram deletadas estavam corretas. Elas são usadas desta forma para expressar um edifício tridimensional, com altura, quantidade de pavimentos e etc. A exclusão será revertida.
wille (2018-04-26 14:08:33+00:00): Olá GFDO,

Tudo bem?

Por curiosidade, o que existe atualmente no lugar desse parque que você apagou?

Obrigado,
Abraços,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58382775
naoliv (2018-04-26 14:10:52+00:00): GFDO, o que exatamente está desatualizado nesse monte de objeto que você removeu, por favor?
wille (2018-05-09 12:37:19+00:00): edit reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58382775
hsc666 (2018-05-01 09:45:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58579536 where the changeset comment is: Revert fictional park added to cheat Pokémon Go. Edits on OSM must match the reality on the ground! https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/04/01/tips-pokemon-go-2
tonyf1 (2018-04-25 00:43:36+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the map contributions. You have created a huge building, what were you intending to map?
tonyf1 (2018-04-30 03:21:50+00:00): No reply to comment. so I deleted an impossibly large building.
viloan (2018-04-24 18:03:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
chnav (2018-04-27 09:08:00+00:00): Комментарий к правке не соответствует содержанию. По факту удалены устаревшие покрытия Bing.
user_1749277 (2018-04-27 20:09:12+00:00): Bitte zeichne nur das was es auch in der Realität gibt! Wenn du Fragen hast oder Hilfe benötigst kannst du dich gerne melden!
Vielen Dank, emga
maraf24 (2018-04-30 14:29:21+00:00): A co to "na' ma znaczyć?
Zmiany w całości wycofałem:
1. przeciągnięciu punktu
2. Prawidłowa nazwa to plac Cichociemnych, a nie skwer.
eggie (2018-04-24 19:09:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Zorg er wel svp voor dat de edits ook de werkelijkheid verbeelden en niet alleen om pokemongo effecten te verkrijgen. De edits liggen vandaag onder een vergrootglas gezien de massale vernieling van de kaart.
eggie (2018-04-24 19:20:35+00:00): Ik weet niet allemaal wat je bedoeling is hier. oefenen? Al je edits komen daadwerkelijk op de kaart.
Een forest zal iets grote zijn dan een boom. Dan op een node natural=tree taggen area = yes doet helemaal niets in OSM.
Gebouwen zijn ingemeten door het kadaster en kloppen precies. Ga niet naar de dakrand kijken, want de luchtfoto;s vertekenen. 
Natural=water rendert op een vlak. Dus niet op een way. waterway=drain is een soort waterafvoer met verharde ondergrond.. beton. een sloot is waterway=ditch
Elementen als sloot en wegen plakken we niet aan landuse. dat geeft ellende.
... en ja... elk begin is moeilijk. Kun je er wat mee?
eggie (2018-04-24 19:21:32+00:00): Dit was je edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=58383644
user_5359 (2018-04-25 15:08:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why we didn't need the information "amenity=school" but the name of the school?
freebeer (2018-04-27 10:52:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58472070 where the changeset comment is: Revert Pokemon vandalismus
eggie (2018-04-24 19:23:48+00:00): Beschrijf precies je edits in je comment... 
Dus track met naam toegevoegd. 
area yes omgetagd naar forest
gebouw naam gegeven Dijkstreek... Klopt dat wel?
pitscheplatsch (2018-04-25 16:05:40+00:00): Hi Erathia,

I think you should not use the name tag for describing the buildings, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Thanks.
aharvey (2018-10-25 02:36:12+00:00): As a human I can't tell from the LPI NSW Imagery that https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/393210208 is paved. Can you tell?

In fact it looks unpaved, but we could leave it untagged until it can be surveyed.
jaecord (2018-10-25 15:12:44+00:00): Looking back at it now, I also can't tell the surface of Richard Road on Scotland Island from any imagery source. I'll go ahead and remove the surface tag I added. Thank you!

Edit found in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63871146#map=17/-33.64089/151.28966
magrej (2018-10-26 09:51:55+00:00): Hi aharvey,

Thank you for pointing this out. The paved tag remained from one of the previous changes. After I had splitted the way into two, I didn't removed the tag because I assumed it was correct. However, I should have checked the validity of the tag more carefully.
The tag is removed now until the surface type can be confirmed. I've also edited the geometry according to the LPI NSW Base Map since the geometry itself can't be confirmed by any imagery.

Best,
magrej
aharvey (2018-10-26 12:38:25+00:00): Thanks for fixing this @jaecord. I would like to know more about the process. Was your AI detecting this as paved, because that's some pretty bad AI. Did this go through a human check?

@magrej it's quite clear from https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58383914/ that the surface tag was added in this changeset, so not by you.

I'd go do a survey and Mapillary capture, but it's a $15 ferry ride... though at low tide it's own a 200m swim, so unless someone beats me too it, when the water warms up in a few months I'll survey it.
jaecord (2018-10-26 14:51:42+00:00): Hi @aharvey, this was definitely a human check. When taking a look at the AI, I based the surface tag on the slivers of road that I could see, which appeared to be paved in my opinion (such as this portion here: -33.6407295, 151.2873387). However, this is a questionable assumption seeing as how the AI is not the best for seeing the roads on Scotland Island. Thanks for checking and I'll be sure to have definitive AI before adding surface tags in the future.
eggie (2018-04-24 19:26:11+00:00): Ook hier weer .. beschrijf je edits. tracktype toegevoegd.. naam van bos gehaald.

,, Waterway drain zal misschien =ditch moeten zijn. Of loopt daar echt een drain in een betonnen bak?
eggie (2018-04-24 19:32:08+00:00): Water en bos lopen over elkaar heen. Die bomen taggen op nodes met natural=tree 
Die drains maar even helemaal weghalen. natural=water behouden
water=ditch kan daar nog bij. bos splitsen en aan weerszijden van het water houden. water en bos gaat niet goed samen in rendering. Rond de bomen kun je gewoon landuse = grass taggen over het geheel. Ga je ermee aan de slag?
eggie (2018-04-24 19:34:51+00:00): Als voorbeeld zet ik even een boom.
user_5359 (2018-04-25 15:06:09+00:00): Hello! Short hint: a outer line of a relation can't be inside of another outer line of the same relation. And the lake is part of park, isn't it?
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-25 01:39:08+00:00): Is access=destination correct?  That would make sense if "No through traffic" is posted.  Also looks like it's correct to have it as a track on the one you changed to footway.  Maybe highway=path, but looks like it's suitable for getting a truck down it to maintain the place.  So motor_vehicle=no might be better if cars aren't generally allowed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384220
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-25 01:39:55+00:00): Dirt cycleways are rather not typical, but a dirt path would be more likely, with bicycle=* and foot=* tags as appropriate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384338
bbmiller (2018-04-25 11:18:30+00:00): Looks good! Thanks for adding the book store
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384405
johnny_1982 (2018-04-25 00:10:04+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du mir erklären wieso du hier die Straßennamen verändert hast? Hast du überhaupt Ortskenntnis? Die Stadt Braunschweig hat hier 2015 neue Straßennamen eingeführt, siehe hier: https://www.braunschweig.de/politik_verwaltung/bekanntmachungen/strassennamen/WaggumerWeg_Eckenerstr_Lilienthalplatz.pdf
Das deine Annahmen nicht passen, hättest du gemerkt, wenn du dir die Historie der Straßen angesehen hättest!
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-25 01:40:34+00:00): It looks like this actually is a track.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384496
Caleb Philliber (2018-04-25 03:19:32+00:00): I could change it to path but it's for walkers and bikes only.
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-27 00:56:23+00:00): Right, a path would be most appropriate versus footway, which is geared only to pedestrians (or might be open to bikes but isn't designed to handle any real volume of bikes).
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-25 01:41:09+00:00): I can see signage for cyclists in the shadows, this is definitely not a footway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58384525
viloan (2018-04-24 18:54:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
alan_gr (2018-04-25 09:09:42+00:00): Hola Daniel,
Tengo una duda sobre cómo etiquetar este deporte. He usado a veces sport=paddle_tennis pero leyendo Wikipedia me doy cuenta que me he equivocado, no es exactamente el mismo deporte. No tengo claro si en inglés el nombre más común es paddle o padel. Está regulado por "the International Padel Federation" http://www.padelfip.com/, tal vez padel sería la mejor opción?
dcapillae_old (2018-04-25 12:22:34+00:00): He estado investigando un poco el tema. En Taginfo aparecen 363 coincidencia para «sport=padel», 1428 coincidencias para «sport=paddle_tennis» y 229 coincidencias para «sport=paddle». En el wiki sólo está documentada la etiqueta «sport=paddle_tennis». Se trata en realidad de dos deportes diferentes, así que creo que habría que diferenciar entre pistas de «sport=padel» y pistas de «sport=paddle_tennis». En el wiki sólo está documentada la etiqueta «sport=paddle_tennis». https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport%3Dpaddle_tennis

No sé mucho sobre estos deportes. Diría que el más popular en España es el pádel, no el «paddle_tennis». Si te parece bien, podemos etiquetar todas estas pistas con «sport=padel» para que tengan un etiquetado homogéneo.
dcapillae_old (2018-04-25 17:56:42+00:00): Hola, Alan.

He creado una página en el wiki para describir la etiqueta «sport=padel» y diferenciarla de «sport=paddle_tennis». Así están cubiertas ambas prácticas deportivas, la del padel y la del «paddle tennis»: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dpadel

Podemos usar «sport=padel» si te parece bien. Creo que es lo que más se practica en España. Siéntete libre de ampliar o modificar la página del wiki donde te parezca oportuno. 

Cordialmente,

Daniel
alan_gr (2018-04-25 18:37:52+00:00): Perfecto, yo tampoco sé mucho de estos deportes (en mí país ningúna de las versiones se practica que yo sepa) pero había llegado a la misma conclusión que «sport=padel» es la etiqueta más adecuada para lo que se juega aquí.
dcapillae_old (2018-04-25 20:14:47+00:00): Gracias, Alan. Ya está corregido: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58420670
naoliv (2018-04-24 19:02:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54330004, 55779307, 55779324, 55779427, 55779449, 55779497.
maraf24 (2018-04-25 20:30:51+00:00): Czym jest spowodowana ta zmiana kategorii dróg?
maraf24 (2018-04-27 13:49:40+00:00): Lokalny mapper też nie widzi w tych zmianach sensu.
Zestaw wycofałem.
Proszę nie nadużywać kategorii secondary - to są drogi typowo wojewódzkie, a więc mające oddziałowywanie na duży obszar - na pewnie nie na obszar jednego miasta.
gileri (2018-05-03 20:27:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour le côté franchise, il y a le tag brand=Atol possible.

Par contre c'est étonnant le nom du magasin ne correspond pas au tag operator que tu as mis.
elkueb (2018-04-27 10:00:25+00:00): Hallo,

die Grasflaechen zwischen den Fahrbahnen der Donaustadtstrasse sind keine Parks.
user_5359 (2018-04-25 15:03:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of key ele (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele). Your "sealevel" isn't a allowed value.
maraf24 (2018-04-25 20:32:46+00:00): Skwery przy drogach, zieleń wzdłuż chodników oraz betonowe place nie są parkami.
Czy teraz możesz spróbować uzasadnić, dlaczego uważasz inaczej? Park nie jest synonimem terenu zielonego.
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-25 01:41:53+00:00): This definitely looks like a concrete bridge on the aerial, and definitely not a footway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58385494
Caleb Philliber (2018-04-25 03:17:37+00:00): What would you classify it as then, since it's for walkers and occasionally bikes only.
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-27 00:56:46+00:00): That would be a path.
emergency99 (2018-04-24 19:33:37+00:00): Hi,

wenn er keinen Namen hat, dann bitte den Name-Tag auch leer lassen. Die Beschreibung gehört in description oder note.
emergency99 (2018-04-24 19:40:55+00:00): Hsbe das nun etwas korrigiert. Auch sind tags generell in Englisch. Also size=klein macht keinen sinn. Auch gibt es da höchstens einen height und width tag für sowas.
elkueb (2018-04-27 09:45:02+00:00): Noch ein kleiner Tipp: wenn du in iD "b" drueckst (oder rechts am Rand schaust), kannst du unterschiedliche Hintergruende auswaehlen. Fuer Teiche in Wiener Parks ist z.B. die "Vienna: Mehrzweckkarte" empfehlenswert -- nach der ich den Teich jetzt mal neu gezeichnet hab.
lg, elkueb
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-24 21:37:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58389714 where the changeset comment is: Revert Pokémon Go related edits by Fuchsiared. Edits on OSM must match the reality on the ground! https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/04/01/tips-pokemon-go-2
Nakaner (2018-04-24 21:39:58+00:00): Hallo Fuchsiared,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Deine Beiträge sehen leider erfunden und nicht der Realität entsprechend aus. Die von dir verwendeten Tags passen nicht zum Luftbild oder sind unlogisch. Bitte trage in OpenStreetMap keine Dinge ein, die nicht der Realität entsprechen. Deine Änderungen habe ich soeben zurückgesetzt.

Ein weitere Grund für das Zurücksetzen war, dass du das Tag natural=scrub beim Feuchtgebiet um das Tegeler Fließ entfernt hast, was schlicht und einfach falsch ist. Ich kenne mich dort aus!

Siehe dazu auch
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tipps-fuer-neue-pokemon-go-mapper/?lang=de
und
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/04/01/tips-pokemon-go-2/#


Viele Grüße

Michael
Fuchsiared (2018-04-24 22:12:07+00:00): Hallo Michael,
die Änderung des Bioms am Tegeler Flies war nicht beabsichtigt. 
Die Gartenanlagen sind allerdings durchaus der Realität entsprechend und stimmen auch mit den Satellitenbildern überein. 
Ich kenne mich in dieser Gegend gut aus.
bielebog (2018-04-25 20:20:05+00:00): Wie kommst Du zu der Benennung? Gibt es dort Tafeln an den Spielgeräten?
bielebog (2018-04-25 20:19:59+00:00): Wie kommst Du zu der Benennung? Gibt es dort Tafeln an den Spielgeräten?
muralito (2018-04-25 02:36:22+00:00): Leonardo

¿La "Cruz Roja Argentina" tiene nombre en idioma Afrikaans? Los nombres solo se ponen si realmente existen, hay que evitar trasliteraciones que ademas podrian hacerse automaticas.
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-25 01:42:59+00:00): It doesn't look like any lanes are marked on Wireless Way, only ways with marked lanes get lanes tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58386279
bielebog (2018-04-25 20:19:51+00:00): Wie kommst Du zu der Benennung? Gibt es dort Tafeln an den Spielgeräten?
AndreasTUHU (2018-04-25 11:20:16+00:00): Városi környezetben inkább parknak kellene jelölni az ilyen zöldfelületeket (leisure=park), a meadow inkább olyan rét amit állatok legeltetésére használnak.
Constable (2018-04-25 06:43:20+00:00): ciao, grazie per l'aggiunta. Occhio però che all'estremità est la ciclabile non è connessa ad una strada/sentiero, quindi adesso come adesso risulta senza uscita.
Altro problema invece è qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3561343641 . Quel nodo indica un attraversamento stradale, la ciclabile quindi in quel punto deve essere connessa con la strada, senò risulta che strada e ciclabile sono su livelli diversi e quindi da una non si riesce ad andare sull'altra, cosa che non è vera.
Se riesci per favore correggi.
Grazie, ciao!
Constable (2018-04-25 06:45:03+00:00): ciao, anche questa ciclabile risulta senza uscita alla sua estremità ovest, se nella realtà non lo è va connessa al resto della rete stradale
grazie
keujfl839237 (2018-04-25 07:35:37+00:00): Hallo! Ich habe die von dir eingezeichnete Wiese von "Park" in "Wiese, Weide" korrigiert. ("Wiese, Weide" findest du im iD-Editor unter Flächennutzung oder du kannst es ins Suchfeld eingeben.) Grüsse
SimonPoole (2018-04-25 07:39:59+00:00): @SelfishSeahorse danke für die Korrekturen und den Revert.

@broggi89 Willkommen bei OSM, kannst du jeweils den Kommentar bei deinen Edits jeweils an die tatsächlichen Arbeiten anpassen?`Danke.
keujfl839237 (2018-04-25 07:28:08+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Leider musste ich deine Bearbeitung rückgängig machen, da sie nicht der Realität entspricht: nicht alles, was grün ist, ist auch ein Park. Gruss
BAK365 (2018-04-25 11:09:24+00:00): Hallo, du hast den Mittelgäubach (stream) zu Krebskanal (canal) geändert. Ist das real oder Phantasie?
Beste Grüsse
BAK365
BAK365 (2018-04-30 11:48:00+00:00): Revertiert da unplausibel und keine Antwort (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58552402).
johsin18 (2018-04-25 05:21:35+00:00): Hi mapper999,

to the best of my knowledge the third turn lane is also massively blocked, see the left side of

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=tWXSe13C7RWjV7LAB9eYxw&focus=photo&lat=47.5794695347567&lng=7.600161870804413&z=17

Or have you resurveyed this personally, very recently?  The aerial imagery is already more than one year old.
mapper999 (2018-04-25 19:31:41+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis, ich habe die Sperre an der Ausfahrt jetzt noch ergänzt. Die Stelle ist mir nur beim Vorbeifahren vor ein paar Wochen aufgefallen, ich kann also nicht mit Sicherheit sagen, wie es dort aktuell aussieht. Für mich sieht es so aus als würde das Gelände für Fahrsicherheitstrainings benutzt, mir ist allerdings nicht klar, wo die Zufahrt ist. Ich habe jetzt alle Wege innerhalb des Geländes auf access=no gesetzt, evtl wäre auch access=private angemessen. Nur das Eintragen der Sperren wird von den meisten Routern ignoriert.