piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
muralito (2019-12-05 18:08:25+00:00): There are two resources. 
1) The rule in http://www.montevideo.gub.uy search for Resolución N° 824/18/1500
2) Go and survey now or trust my word.

We are having a discussion with other collaboratos here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77609767 (unrelated changeset, but i think its the same problem, taking old sources to make changes).

Maybe you (or not only you but everyone of us) sholud check that the age of the source is newer than the date of the last changeset of the element.
muralito (2019-12-05 18:09:29+00:00): The resolution I refered to is from october 2018.
CapAhab (2019-12-05 18:37:17+00:00): Great, thank you for these resources
muralito (2019-12-05 18:38:29+00:00): http://www.montevideo.gub.uy/asl/sistemas/gestar/resoluci.nsf/WEB/1500/824-18-1500
literan (2019-11-27 17:54:49+00:00): спасибо вам за правки! сведения из новых микрорайонов особенно ценны, т.к. их не добыть из иных источников
IIVQ (2020-01-01 15:34:18+00:00): Hoi de Vries,

Je hebt in dit gebied een BAG-update gedaan. Er is echter een probleem met het pand https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712367877 - dat staat als 1 deel in de BAG, maar het zijn 2 delen (noordelijk en zuidelijk) met één ondergrondse binnenplaats. Ik heb dat destijds gecorrigeerd (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73206046), maar jij hebt dat daarna weer teruggecorrigeerd uit de BAG. 

Wat kan ik doen om dit bij evt toekomstige BAG-updates te voorkomen?

Groet, IIVQ
de vries (2020-01-01 20:19:45+00:00): Sorry hiervoor. 
Van wat ik me kan herinneren was dit gebied nog al een zooitje toen ik er aan begon, veel  dingen waren slordig ingetekend op osm, maar ook de BAG klopte niet helemaal. Ik heb geprobeerd hier kaas van te maken en omdat het betreffende gebouw op PDOK één geheel lijkt heb ik denk ik geconcludeerd dat de BAG hier klopte.

Om dergelijke problemen te voorkomen kan je een note tag toevoegen. Bijvoorbeeld: 'note:BAG=aangepast aan de hand van survey' of iets dergelijks.

Ook kan je bij het splitsen van gebouwen het BAG pand intact laten en de verschillende onderdelen als 'building:part=*' inteken. Ik durf echter niet te zeggen of dat in dit geval een handige oplossing is.
IIVQ (2020-01-05 16:20:16+00:00): Hoi,

Je hoeft je zéker niet te excuseren! Iedereen doet ook maar zijn best.
Ik heb geen bewijzen maar ik heb het gevoel dat Diemen nogal slordig omgaat met BAG bij het hele project Holland Park - objecten die al bewoond zijn en nog op bouwvergunning verleend staan, terwijl ik ook verblijfsobject gevormd zie terwijl de fundamenten net gestort zijn. 

Ik zal je tips ter harte nemen, de note heb ik in beide vlakken gezet.

Ik zie nu ook dat het noordelijke deel als één blok getekend is (en in de BAG staat) maar waarschijnlijk heeft dat ook een binnenplaats. Dat is echter op de PDOK luchtfoto's nog niet te zien. Ik hou het in de gaten.
user_5359 (2019-11-27 17:06:40+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! 
Wie kann ich die Höhe 0 für vierzehn Gebäude verstehen?
GinaroZ (2019-11-26 22:54:00+00:00): Is the H in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437294679 a typo?
jambamkin (2019-12-21 14:59:15+00:00): Dont think so, http://www.northdhulochcottage.co.uk/ I'm guessing this is the house and the cottage at the end of the lane.
GinaroZ (2019-12-22 16:09:57+00:00): Thanks, I've added the holiday cottage
d3d9 (2019-11-26 22:00:50+00:00): (+ Ladesäule ohne Details)
Glassman (2019-11-27 01:16:11+00:00): Please don't add fake features to OSM. Your edit has been deleted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77597778
user_5359 (2019-11-27 05:52:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again). Please check the meaning of addr:unit. All of your address entry have the addr:unit=St.
user_5359 (2019-11-27 05:50:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the separator between the different opening_hours parts is a semicolon instead a slash. Please also check the value for sunday you write Su 07:30 until Mo 09:00.
Glassman (2019-11-27 01:15:02+00:00): Please don't add fake features to OSM. Your edit has been deleted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77598207
mavl (2019-11-27 16:31:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Пожалуйста, имейте в виду, что в России действуют соглашения о статусах дорог и их их названиях.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3  
  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были взяты адреса?
eggie (2019-11-27 07:28:58+00:00): Dag Henkes.. Je vraagt om een review. 
Het lijkt me oke. 
Wanneer je hier niet met tweewielers mag komen kun je nog vehicle=no taggen 
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-11-27 05:44:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved an address https://www.osm.org/node/6250469108 node over 100 meters, Please check the position.
literan (2019-11-27 17:45:47+00:00): нет, не надо все подряд писать в поле name, тем более капсом. Ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
user_5359 (2019-11-27 05:42:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
viloan (2019-11-26 23:18:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
gendy54 (2019-12-07 23:05:56+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai juste changer le tag de la surface d'eau qui est plus un bassin qu'un plan d'eau
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77599467
alrgrt (2019-12-08 21:31:31+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez bien fait, c'est effectivement bien un bassin !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77599467
eggie (2019-11-27 07:54:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Glassman (2019-11-27 01:17:55+00:00): Thanks for removing the vandalism on Flexology two changeset with the minecraft tag. I left him a note. and have flagged him to keep a watch on his edits.
PT-53 (2019-11-29 09:21:56+00:00): Hallo HaStMe,
Du hast an diesem Weg 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702357755/history
das Merkmal highway=construction in highway=track abgeändert. Wenn der Weg wieder befahrbar ist, sollte auch noch das Merkmal construction=service gelöscht werden. Das Merkmal segregated=no ist bei einem Feldweg auch unnötig.
Machst Du das noch?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-08 10:29:18+00:00): erledigt
gendy54 (2019-12-07 23:03:57+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai décoléré le point adresse du Darty, l'adresse devant être unique mais pouvant être le support adresse de plusieurs entités.
Sinon ok pour le reste.
Depuis quand cette pharmacie est ici? Impossible de la trouver sur le répertoire du ministère de la santé
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77600153
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-28 06:23:56+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4130959 ?
aharvey (2019-11-27 02:49:00+00:00): Looks good.
jonorossi (2019-11-28 01:51:13+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. highway=service was actually the correct tagging, along with service=parking_aisle on subordinate ways.

Best option would be to add an area tagged with amenity=parking, and tag access=customers to indicate it isn't a public carpark, or access=private if it is for staff use only. The wiki has heaps more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
mariotomo (2019-11-27 15:57:53+00:00): hola, gracias por mapear en Panamá.
te sugiero dos puntos, y espero tengas tiempo de mejorarlos:
- el campo correcto para el número de las casas es `addr:housenumber`.  `name` sirve para edificios que tengan nombre propio, como puede ser un museo, o un supermercado que lo ocupe todo.
- el editor iD tiene la posibilidad de asegurarse que todos los ángulos en el objeto seleccionado sean de 90°.  no me acuerdo como se hace, sé que se puede.

si las casas son todas iguales, puedes mapear más rápido con copia-pega.  te soluciona también el producir los objetos todos con la misma orientación.
mariotomo (2019-11-27 15:58:37+00:00): p.s.: por comparación: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294447206
treestryder (2022-07-03 16:19:35+00:00): Unless that track is really named, "CLOSED April 1-Sept 14", might I suggest the use of conditional restrictions and the description tag, rather than the name tag.

* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

Also, Michigan mappers have been meeting up once a month. See our Wiki page for details (and a cheat sheet for common mapping schemes and more).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Community
hoskerism (2019-11-27 01:11:44+00:00): Why did you revert this? The 'Australian Meat Emporium' node was in the wrong place. It's at 29 - 31 O'Riordan St.
aharvey (2019-11-27 01:24:48+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2390154110
because you'd replaced it with the Homemaker Center mall which is already mapped at 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554571579

If the butcher is in the wrong location, then best to drag the node to the correct location.
hoskerism (2019-11-27 02:03:04+00:00): OK thanks. I have now dragged the node to the correct location.
aharvey (2019-11-27 02:07:54+00:00): Thanks!
viloan (2019-11-27 01:14:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_8466505 (2020-11-07 19:31:37+00:00): Hello Willmaps,
On street addresses, it is discouraged to use prefixes such as W. Venice Blvd. In the future, please remember to use the full street address, such as Venice Boulevard. More info here:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29. I have corrected the street address for you.

Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
MapMakerGal (2019-11-27 11:28:21+00:00): Ola, en primeiro lugar grazas polas túas edicións. En segundo lugar veño a pedirche que deteñas as túas edicións erróneas, son erros moi graves e que empeoran o mapa. Por exemplo, neste cambio engadiches varios puntos como tenda de mobles, isto non ten ningún sentido. Para saber de que xeito se eiquetan as cousas podes consultar na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page ou no Telegram de OSM España, etc...
aharvey (2019-11-27 02:11:25+00:00): +1. but you can still place it in the loc_name tag if you like.
sskalyan (2019-12-28 08:20:54+00:00): Hi,

Road class is residential here, reverting your editd.

Thanks,
Kalyan.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77603482
Dimacn (2019-11-27 14:40:19+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение карты. Но не надо писать название жилым домам в name. Для указания номера дома, используйте тег addr:housenumber - подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
user_5359 (2019-11-27 05:15:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_10500952 (2019-11-27 05:06:46+00:00): https://goo.gl/maps/guffaH2v2PgwCg6E6
Aqui se puede ver el parque
eggie (2019-11-27 08:45:38+00:00): Hoi tunnlr.. leisure=park is alleen maar een transparant die de functie aangeeft en meestal de naam draagt. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665

leisure=park kan dus als één losse cover over het gebied worden gelegd en daarbinnen teken je dan de landuse wat je ziet. Dus bos, struiken, water, gras e.d.
Er hoort dan niet nog een keer een lossen node= leisure park in met name= ...
leisure=park mag niet op een node
Ik pas even wat aan.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-11-27 08:59:03+00:00): Naam staat nu op vlak leisure=park en voorlopig even wat landuse=grass en foerst ingevuld. Zal nog wel veranderen in de toekomst.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-11-27 10:02:36+00:00): Volgens mij is het "Land van Vliedduin" ipv Land van Vlietduinen. Ik heb het aangepast.
https://www.veere.nl/bestemmingsplan-land-van-vliedduin-domburg
Mocht het verkeerd zijn laat het even weten.

Gr eggie
eggie (2019-11-27 10:25:00+00:00): Woning Vliedduinen 6 heb ik laten importeren. Wanneer er meer gebouwen komen kun je het zelf aanvragen via het forum. Inlog identiek aan osm account. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=770331#p770331
tunnlr (2019-11-27 16:20:41+00:00): Hoi, bedankt voor je tips/edits! Naam is nu inderdaad correct, gemeente Veere gebruikte zelf elders nog foutief  "Land van Vlietduinen"
eggie (2019-11-27 16:37:07+00:00): Het kan verkeren zei Bredero... De officiële Kadasteradressen wijken nu af van de parknaam. 
Dat krijgen ze nooit meer veranderd ben ik bang. 
Ik heb de Prinsenweg doorgetrokken om bij de woningen te komen. Geen idee of het klopt. Up to you
Gr eggie
user_10500952 (2019-11-27 05:02:55+00:00): https://goo.gl/maps/guffaH2v2PgwCg6E6
Aqui se puede ver el parque con zona verde
user_10500952 (2019-11-27 05:05:06+00:00): Enlace anterior erroneo. El correcto es este:
https://goo.gl/maps/fCUhxjxHCKSgCkwo7
Jordi MF (2019-11-27 08:33:05+00:00): No se trataba de un parque. Realmente, es una plaza con árboles y juegos infantiles. Ya lo he modificado. Consulta la wiki para ver qué se considera "leisure=park" en OpenStreetMap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en).

Saludos,
Jordi
Joseph E (2019-12-19 03:30:15+00:00): diahputri, terima kasih atas kerja keras Anda untuk menabah bangunan di kampung Hom-Hom, Wamena. 

Untuk bikin gedung lebih rapi-rapi, bisa pakai "q" unuk bikin gedung persegi, kalau anda pakai editor iD (openstreetmap.org/edit).

Juga ada opsi lebih mudah untuk membuat gedung dengan cepat: pakai program JOSM dengan plug-in Buildings: https://josm.openstreetmap.de dan tambah https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Preferences/Plugins con ​"buildings_tools" untuk dibujar gedung dengan persegi dengan 2 klik aja.

Terima kasih,
Joseph Eisenberg
Self-Perfection (2019-11-27 17:53:04+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Здорово, что вы попробовали внести вклад в OpenStreetMap - проект, из которого MAPS.ME берёт картографические данные.

Вижу вы в этой правке добавили новый объект - отель https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7013022887

Он дублирует уже давно существующий в OSM отель https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3928910864 следовало поправить старый объект, иначе получилось, что в этом здании два отеля.
Self-Perfection (2019-11-27 17:56:02+00:00): Я перенёс новые данные на старую точку отеля.
user_5359 (2019-11-27 05:28:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
kucai (2021-05-15 10:40:13+00:00): why did you change all the unclassified roads to residential? Have you ever been here?
Fanny IRM-ED (2021-05-20 06:13:07+00:00): thank you for restoring it back. forgot that I ignored the local knowledge when editing this changeset.
wireguy (2019-11-27 14:01:46+00:00): I was in the area and made a couple of adjustments to the parking and service roads.  Added the bank.
user_5359 (2019-11-27 17:15:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description as standard keys, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
wambacher (2019-11-28 22:36:40+00:00): hey, what is going on there?
Dimacn (2019-11-27 14:42:53+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение карты. Но не надо писать название жилым домам в name. Для указания номера дома, используйте тег addr:housenumber - подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
user_5359 (2019-11-27 17:44:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mavl (2019-11-27 16:59:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот водоём явно ошибка. Здесь нет озера или чего-то подобного.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/749997230
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-11-27 06:56:23+00:00): Ukraine:Fixed "Crossing highway/waterway";"Crossing building/highway" issues;improved geometry
mavl (2020-02-22 06:36:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mariotomo (2019-11-27 16:03:35+00:00): hi.  I'm curious, how do you know the directionality (yes/no/which) of road segments?  guessing: you're using uber information as a source?  maybe you want to mention it in the source field.
Sarathv (2019-11-29 09:01:37+00:00): Hi Mariotomo,
We have our local presence in this area and based on the ESRI imagery i see there is a stop sign and Mapillary has image where we have cars parked in both the sides. We appreciate your concern and do let me know if you have any other inputs to share. 
Regards,
Sarath V
muralito (2019-12-05 13:37:32+00:00): Hi Sarathv.

There have been lots of change in directionality by the local authorities.

Please do not take Mapillary as a good source for this kind of changes, because only if the imagery is weeks or sometime days old would display what the real world is.
mariotomo (2019-12-05 13:46:20+00:00): Sarathv seems to be working for uber, and they are surely interested in having the best available information.  maybe their drivers could collect gps traces of what they do drive, respecting local rules (and customs)?  otherwise, muralito, you see, they find a road with a one-way=yes tag, 6 years old, and they can't confirm it on their ESRI source, it's quite reasonable that they remove the tag.  anyhow, without local presence, such information becomes guess-work.
muralito (2019-12-05 15:03:57+00:00): I assume that all of us collaborate for having better free geodata.

But there is a problem with getting gps traces from several sources, as a lot of drivers (car, motorbikes and/or bikes) do not respect the rules and their traces can/will show a path that it is illegal to take.
mariotomo (2019-12-05 15:08:10+00:00): my idea was: »we're discussing uber.«  they have car drivers.  if uber can assume that their drivers respect rules, maybe they can use their traces as information source.  which is maybe better than mapillary (which Sarathv did not mention) or ESRI (which seems to be their source.)
muralito (2019-12-05 15:49:49+00:00): In Uruguay, no one can assume that ALL drivers respect the rules, as a lot or most drivers do, but it is naive to assume that all drivers do, and should not be used for doing changes in OSM.

But sure it could be used for a tool to warn about some ways for survey.
mariotomo (2019-12-05 16:36:21+00:00): now I'm digressing, but time ago I remarked about the mapping of the Golan Heights, that show the `de facto` and not the `de jure` situation.  and the reply from the editors was indeed that OSM shows reality, not theory.  with this logic, very few roads in my home town should be marked one-way, or maybe the values could be 'yes/no/if_you_think_so'.

without an active local mappers community, things become difficult.
muralito (2019-12-05 17:52:41+00:00): i'm a local mapper.
muralito (2019-12-05 17:57:50+00:00): you could drive wrong direction, but if get caught by traffic agents you get a fine, or if you have a crash you get full liability.
MikeN (2019-12-02 00:03:15+00:00): Hi, what is the reason for adding the turn restrictions?   There is no divided median here.
kshtdh (2019-12-02 10:09:51+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the comment, Apologies for the mistake. I have removed the turn restrictions under changeset # 77811707. I will keep in mind to have such errors checked hereafter.

Regards,
kshtdh
marczoutendijk (2023-01-26 09:42:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2260447194
¿Por qué ha utilizado aquí la etiqueta sym=Flag?
user_5359 (2019-11-27 17:23:55+00:00): Hello! For a better description of the access value please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:access . I changed the value of http://www.osm.org/way/750002084 from all to yes (standard value).
devratc (2019-11-28 09:15:54+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for correcting the edit. Apologies for the error. I Will ensure not to repeat the error again.Looking forward to learning more from you.
Regards,
devratc.