piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2021-11-09 22:57:22+00:00): Hola Angel,

Gràcies per millorar les dades d'OSM al voltant d'Almassora. Hem vist que has mapejat una tenda anomenada Midia com si fora un mercat (amenity=marketplace). Fixa't en la definició que dona la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmarketplace
Esta etiqueta s'utilitza per a indicar mercats ton xicotetes parades tenen un lloc de venda. Crec que eixa tenda estaria millor etiquetada com a tenda de regals (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dgift).
Et convidem a unir-te a la comunitat d'usuaris valencians en Telegram. Busca-la com a "Comunitat valenciana d'OpenStreetMap".
Salutacions,
Jordi
mueschel (2021-11-12 09:58:41+00:00): Hi,
this building got a strange tag, could you check that?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000539167
AlkalIn (2023-10-18 13:22:40+00:00): Hi. It is indeed not a recognized tag (ANTIC). I am not sure what was meant by the person who created it. So I removed it.
Jiří Komárek (2022-10-20 12:45:46+00:00): Ahoj, prosím tě: opravoval jsem teď jednu budovu v Lipové - ty jsi ji předělal podle RUIANu - problém je, že v reálu vypadá jinak než tam (jde to vidět i ze satelitního snímku). Navíc se tam přidalo start_date někdy z roku 2019 - ta budova má určitě víc jak 50 let. Příště to prosím porovnávej alespoň s tím satelitním snímkem. Díky
stlmapper74 (2021-11-14 14:09:20+00:00): I spent a lot of time and effort on the new configuration of Route N and Weiss Rd. None of the various aerial imageries are up to date enough to reflect the recent change.
stlmapper74 (2021-11-14 21:17:11+00:00): Meaning you reverted a change I made from my own local knowledge.
user_8101879 (2021-11-21 16:03:08+00:00): Hi,

sorry. You right, imagery on osm is old and outdated : I just look at this crossroads on ggle earth (imagery of sept. 2021) and I can see the new configuration. Thank you for your correction, good work.

For your information, I just added a comment on this issue :
https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/1217
Best regards
stlmapper74 (2021-11-21 20:07:36+00:00): It's all good, I fixed it a few days ago.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-09 15:36:13+00:00): Hello Renas Azad,
There's been a discussion about the name of this city going on in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113104060 , but it doesn't seem as if that has come to any conclusion yet.
Can you provide some information that suggests why your preferred name is correct?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-09 15:36:27+00:00): Silav Rênas Azad,
Li ser navê vî bajarî nîqaş hatin kirin
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113104060, lê wisa dixuye ku ew hîn negihîştiye encamekê.
Hûn dikarin hin agahdarî bidin ku destnîşan dikin ka çima navê weya bijartî rast e?
Ligel rêzê,
Andy
Renas Azad (2021-11-11 19:06:06+00:00): Dear andy, hellow
The story of kirkuk city is very complicated, its population is a mix of kurds, arabs, turkmans, assyrians and chaldeans.
Along to the history the majority was for kurds,
But after iraq republic establishment in 1921 and spicifically during the baath regime and saddam husain's rule, they are all worked to kick out the kurds from this city, because it represents the economic backbone of iraq, because of the huge oil reserves.
So, to reduce the number of kurds in kirkuk they displaced kurds there, and made a genocide known as "anfal", they kiled more than 50,000 kurdish person only in kirkuk governorate, and they brought Arab families in their place.
So that, don't believe formal references, such as documents and censuses results.
Then ,after 2003 (saddam husain's regime down), the displaced kurdish familes from kirkuk came back, and must be note they will never remain as they was when displaced, because the families grow up, and each family will be tow family at least, Because young people get married and have their own families!
So this is wat the other kirkuk's habitant regardid it as a kurdization, but the fact is wat i explained.
there are another fact that must be note in kirkuk, the kurds are inhabiting in the most ancint neighborhoods in kirkuk and thier names are in kurdish, but the arabs are inhabiting in the new neighborhoods were established in the recent decades.
And the last fact that must be note is the graveyards, they represents a witness about kirkuk origin returns to whom!
The vast majority of the graves belong to the Kurds.
At last, dont belive, nither me nor others, make your own search and decide wich one of us is true.
Best wishes for all.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-17 12:53:21+00:00): Hello Renas Azad,
Thanks for your reply.  How OpenStreetMap handles situations such as these is described in the Disputed Territories policy https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That says "The OpenStreetMap community operates under the “on the ground” principle, recording what is actually currently used in a particular area, giving pre­eminence to data collected in­-situ".  This means that we don't think about what territory a place _should_ be part of, but what it actually is part of, and the "name" tag will generally reflect the language used by the majority of people there currently.  As can be seen from http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=248436981 , there are names in many other languages here too, and many apps such as OsmAnd will use those names (depending on the language of your phone).
If the majority of people currently here speak Arabic then it would make sense for the "name" tag to be in Arabic.  This isn't making any judgement about who should be controlling the area or what language they would be speaking; it is just trying to reflect what the current situation is.
Best Regards,
Andy
(from OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group)
Renas Azad (2022-05-06 19:31:41+00:00): Dear andy, all the informations given to you about kirkuk is wrong and there aim is to hide the facts of demography of kirkuk by the racist persons, the evidence is in the article 140 (second) of the iraqi constitution, that states to:

Article 140
First
The executive authority shall undertake the necessary steps to complete the
implementation of the requirements of all subparagraphs of Article 58 of the
Transitional Administrative Law.
Second
The responsibility placed upon the executive branch of the Iraqi Transitional
Government stipulated in Article 58 of the Transitional Administrative Law shall extend
and continue to the executive authority elected in accordance with this Constitution,
provided that it accomplishes completely (normalization and census and concludes with
a referendum in Kirkuk and other disputed territories to determine the will of their
citizens), by a date not to exceed the 31st of December 2007.

But all iraqi governments did not implementeed this constitutional article, and worked hard to disrupt it by non constitutional ways.
Now, the question is: why the racists afraid from the census and referendum?!
it is very obviose, they will lose, because the majority in kirkuk for kurds.
Dear andy, if both, me and the other side, failed to convince you, why you let them edit the name of kirkuk to arabic but prevent me from editing it to kurdish?
This attitude is counted as a stand with the other side, While you have to be neutral.
At last, If you are not convinced by both of us, I suggest that the name of Kirkuk be written in English as a compromise.

Best regards.
eggie (2021-11-08 16:18:50+00:00): Dag Albert..

Op recente luchtfoto's ligt de weg anders. 
De Torenwachter zal ik even aanpassen mbv de Quick Ortho 2021.
Je moet straks maar even kijken. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-08 16:35:02+00:00): Wellicht heb je iets aan deze achtergrond om te checken
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=brtachtergrondkaart&res=0.5&datemin=08-11-2020&loc=52.59451%2C6.107838%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-09-22&acqid=20210922_104424_SV1-01&sensor=SuperView-1
phidauex (2021-11-09 23:51:06+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. I'm not sure if you realize this, but edits made here impact real maps that people and businesses use every day. Making fictional edits is considered vandalism and isn't appreciated. If you would like to learn how to use the map editor to improve the map, then I recommend checking out LearnOSM.org for some useful walkthroughs. In the meantime I'm going to revert the two edits you've made so far.
The-Grumpy-Old-Man (2021-11-13 00:41:02+00:00): Victoria Road is private, as is Victoria Gardens, Linley Close & Carlyon Close.
Ser9ei (2021-11-13 15:39:33+00:00): зачем вы сделали и без того неидеальную геометрию ещё хуже? неужели не видно, что угол дома уехал через дорогу. Переместите его на место и нажмите клавишу Q, чтобы выровнять углы.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
tux67 (2021-11-08 17:26:02+00:00): Kleiner Hinweis .. Bing ist hier nicht die aktuellste Quelle .. m.E. sind die aktuellen NRW DOPs die aktuellere um remote Gebäude nachzutragen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113528370
Geofreund1 (2021-11-09 13:09:20+00:00): Mit 
https://www.wms.nrw.de/geobasis/wms_nw_dop?: DOP Farbe (RGB-/Colorbild - Normale farbliche Darstellung.)
als Hintergrund sehe ich allerdings keinen Unterschied. Gibt es noch andere NRW Hintergründe?
tux67 (2021-11-09 13:37:48+00:00): DOPs - nur noch VDOP (interimsversion), die aber jetzt die aktuellen sind. 
Zeitlichen Unterschied siehst du z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923050410
die Auflösung bei Bing ist auch nicht so Klasse ...
ravali_78 (2021-11-09 08:17:04+00:00): Hi violettas_grab,
I have added road classification to untagged way.Kindly check with way 1000550678,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113553901.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113528676
dktue (2021-11-08 18:31:00+00:00): Top, danke!
Ser9ei (2021-11-13 15:37:08+00:00): Что такое lanes=0? Лучше вообще убрать тег.

Разберитесь с модификаторами доступа: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
и значениями по умолчанию, которые явно указывать не надо:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Russia

Если что-то непонятно, задавайте вопросы в телеграм чате @ruosm
Ser9ei (2021-11-13 15:32:37+00:00): Внимательно прочитайте, как указываются адреса: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
mueschel (2021-11-12 09:36:03+00:00): Hi,
you used a "Sligo" tag on two buildings - this is not used in other places, what does it mean?
Pyrak (2021-11-12 11:45:44+00:00): Thanks for the note. I'm not sure what happened there. I've corrected the tags now.
SekeRob (2021-11-10 14:10:01+00:00): hi,

RaiWay Stazione o RAI Way o Rai Way stazione. Seems odd the Upper/lower case, but the sign on the gate says Rai (symbol) Way.

ciao
SekeRob (2021-11-10 14:11:59+00:00): Ah, website reference https://it.worldorgs.com/Catalogare/pescara/stazione-tv/rai-way-pescara-s-silvestro
Aranc (2021-11-10 17:37:52+00:00): http://air-radiorama.blogspot.com/2011/10/rai-onda-media-pescara-san-silvestro.html
SekeRob (2021-11-10 18:01:04+00:00): Not seeing any mention of raiway on that linked blog page other than a picture of the very fate I was talking about. The road may also have incorrect caps of RAI. House number 29 is the address.

Cheers
Aranc (2021-11-10 18:34:19+00:00): http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-89-8605vyvg/To7GIivkzfI/AAAAAAAAAHg/Uog3dS2jdDY/s1600/P1030384p.JPG

This  table is the reference which is placed on most sites.. the name in osm can be adjusted in any way you like
SekeRob (2022-11-03 09:08:15+00:00): Hi,

I've been struggling with ZTL zone tagging versus what OSM Inspector is flagging as having an Island Car issue in Ortona. Studying the Modena ZTL zone, Via Caselle, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23196324 is the only one that is signalled as having the very issue in ZTL, the difference being that everything around is tagged as motor_vehicle=private and this street is motor_vehicle=yes. which highlights basically that all the area is allowed at some time of day/week for cars, but Caselle has no restriction. Given it's inside the ZTL zone it than gets turned into a car island, no in or out. The solution for Caselle is obvious... align with tagging of surrounding streets but given my poor comprehension of the subject, leaving the correction to you 😎

ciao from the Abruzzi.

link: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=10.92515&lat=44.64241&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.45&overlays=islands_car%2Cislands_all
LvdT (2022-11-03 13:49:56+00:00): Hi, thanks for the notification. Fixed.
mariotomo (2023-03-09 15:03:16+00:00): hi … are you sure you know what you're doing, with turn:lanes? a value you added, "through|through|left", means that cars from the rightmost lane must turn LEFT. I see you're using JOSM, maybe you want to use the turn lanes plugin, or ask for help.
SherbetS (2021-12-10 16:33:45+00:00): Thank you.
smootheFiets (2022-02-27 12:22:37+00:00): Dear colleague,
Could you be more specific about your CS description?  Seeing, especially, that you appear to be working in an organized context (Mapbox).  
The "correction" you've performed in this CS is to remove the building tag from a building.  That's the opposite of an improvement.  I've taken the liberty to fix this.  Please be a little more careful in the future!
Greetings, smootheFiets
del_account (2022-03-31 08:13:42+00:00): I`m sorry for this mistake, I thought it`s amenity, not a building.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
praeteritum (2023-06-24 23:32:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137737523.
Jordi MF (2022-12-05 22:39:10+00:00): Hola MikelCalo,
He visto cómo está mapeado el cruce de la Avenida de Pérez Galdós con el Carrer de Tres Forques y el Carrer de Conca.
Por una parte, he visto que había giros de prohibición de giro, pero que, en la realidad, sí que se pueden realizar. Los he eliminado.
Por otra parte, he visto innecesarias la vía "auxiliar" que creaste para indicar el giro desde Pérez Galdós hacia Tres Forques. Creo que añade información innecesaria al mapa y que lo sobrecarga. No existe ninguna barrera física que indique que ahí existe una nueva calzada para dicho giro. Por tanto, no existe un eje de calzada que haya que dibujarse.
Entiendo que has dibujado la "trazada natural" que realizaría un vehículo, pero al no existir barreras físicas, no hay que dibujar una nueva vía. He visto que has hecho eso mismo en otros cruces similares y, al haber añadido rutas de autobuses, es un engorro corregirlo. Sin embargo, creo que debía avisarte para futuras ediciones.

Saludos,
Jordi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Tomas Straupis (2021-11-09 06:48:28+00:00): Grąžinau degalinei shop žymą, atstačiau sugadintą IKI pavadinimą ir pan.
flo2154 (2021-11-08 18:43:42+00:00): Hallo AD_Baldham, danke für deine Bearbeitungen! Du hast in diesem Changeset den Autoteiler-Stellplatz verschoben. Ich nehme an, das war ein Versehen, oder?
Ich habe ihn jedenfalls wieder korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113534182
Viele Grüße, Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113530910
AD_Baldham (2021-11-09 08:12:21+00:00): Hallo Flo,
danke dafür, ich wollte nur einige neue Gebäude nahe Waldstr. eintragen und da ist ja kein VAT Stellplatz ( ich bin selber beim VAT ! ). War das der Stellplatz Fichtenstr. ?
viele Grüße
Achim Dallmann
flo2154 (2021-11-09 13:40:10+00:00): Beim Standort „Arnikastraße / Waldstraße“ (Parkplatz des Altenheims Maria Linden) steht ein Toyota Proace (Transporter/Bus). Siehe https://www.carsharing-vaterstetten.de/VAT/Standorte

Der Standort Fichtenstraße ist separat gemapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/524359410
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
ivanbranco (2021-11-12 21:48:55+00:00): Ciao aa30mon,

il nome era giusto prima. La community italiana ha deciso di seguire le direttive ISTAT per i nomi delle strade, fonte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade

Ripristino la situazione precedente come da Wiki. In ogni caso il nome coi numeri romani è presente come alt_name.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Cristoffs (2021-11-08 18:51:13+00:00): Dzięki dobra Robota !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
edircksen (2021-12-05 14:28:25+00:00): Not an import
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113531822
Dodko (2021-11-08 23:59:22+00:00): Cez už existujúce lesné cesty ste nakreslili nanovo cyklochodník.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782531909
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309999359/history

Mali sa len aktualizovať značky existujúcej cesty, a rozdeliť ju pod Hrachoviskom.
Allroads (2026-07-06 15:17:12+00:00): Hoi Bas,

OSMinspector geofabrik geeft hier een fout aan in turn relaties. Ik snap die no_left_turn niet.

Wat wil je uitdrukken?
Als ik het zo zie is links afslaan toegestaan.

Groeten Allroads.

Waarom OSMinspector daar een fout aangeeft is me niet helemaal duidelijk.
Ik denk dat de from Sontplein er niet in hoort.

In eerste instantie, denk ik dat er geen links afslaan restrictie is.
themartinix (2026-03-26 14:24:45+00:00): Hi SimpleScout;
what was the intention of this mapping project? It looks like a scetch! There's no value for TANAP and other user, and it is a lot of work to bring all this information in a correct topography; I am sorry...
Greetings, Martin
SimpleScout (2026-03-26 20:51:31+00:00): It was mapping streams and watersheds, so I presume that's why it looks crazy!

Luke
KartoGrapHiti (2023-01-08 14:02:20+00:00): Bitte trage Wege mit highway=cayleway nur dann ein, wenn es reine Radwege sind, die weder von Fußgängern noch landwirtschaftlichem Verkehr genutzt werden dürfen. Hier handelte es sich um landwirtschaftliche Wege, auf denen eine Radroute verläuft.
pyrog (2021-11-09 06:19:48+00:00): Hi,
Why did you delete these path in forest ?
Your changeset comment is not clear.

These path are cutlines but also path with sometimes routes.

Could you reverse your changeset please ?

Best regards,
Yves
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113532149
ratrun (2021-11-09 16:56:16+00:00): Hi,
If you look in detail you will see that I only deleted overlapping duplicated ways. At least one of your new ways is still there.
Noen (2021-11-08 18:09:39+00:00): Hei! Hyggelig at du vil forbedre OpenStreetMap for Mapant. Men hva er hensikten med taggen mapant=yes?
aceman444 (2022-12-31 14:23:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244628521 ved v roku 1820 ulica ani neexistovala (boli tu lesy). Aj ta wiki, odkial to neopravnene odpisujete, pise nieco ine. Takze co ma byt to start_date=1820s?
vojtechzaboril (2022-12-31 14:28:15+00:00): Dobrý den,
buď to bude můj překlep nebo jsem to tak vložil omylem. Opravím. Díky.
V
Truchin (2021-11-09 09:41:41+00:00): Bonjour Hartigan,

Le nom de la station Nation est "Nation". RER A, c'est une précision de la ligne qui dessert l'arrêt de RER (info déjà présente dans les autres attributs). Je vais donc renommer la station.

Bonne continuation

Thomas
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-09 13:07:15+00:00): Ciao. I percorsi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289700523, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000594666 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000594665 non sono etichettati correttamente. O sono highway=path (sentieri, non abbastanza larghi per un veicolo a motore a quattro ruote) e allora bisogna togliere la chiave trackype, oppure sono highway=track (strade ad uso agricolo o forestale) e in questo caso si deve ovviamente mantenere tracktype. Ciao, Andrea
Atal Hikr (2021-11-09 17:16:01+00:00): Grazie della segnalazione. Non mi ero accorto dell'errore. Provvederò a correggere quanto prima.
PierZen (2021-11-08 20:47:24+00:00): Suite à l'injonction, la route en construction est toujours là. Je vais la ré-introduire avec indication aire protégée