piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GerdP (2016-01-11 11:14:11+00:00): OK, I though so as well, but http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Daniel%20de%20G%C3%B3es%20Nepomuceno
is an experienced mapper, so I just fixed the typo. Please comment his changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36473928
smaprs (2016-01-11 11:35:33+00:00): Ok, thank you
Rps333 (2016-02-04 02:40:46+00:00): Looking at the Bing imagery. should this be tag building = no?
Supaplex (2016-01-11 08:32:45+00:00): 古道有名稱嗎?
malenki (2016-01-12 18:07:22+00:00): Falls die "Parchimer Chaussee" nach "Crivitzer Straße" umbenannt wurde (wegen Eingemeindung o.ä.) ist es sinnvoll (und die Regel), den alten Namen als "old_name" einzutragen.
malenki (2016-01-13 16:55:10+00:00): Vielen Dank, dass du old_name zukünftig berücksichtigen und auch in früheren Changesets nachtragen willst.
Tipp:
Es wäre hilfreich, Changeset-Diskussionen komplett öffentlich zu führen, damit andere Mapper, die die gleiche Frage haben, nicht nochmal nachfragen müssen.
woodpeck (2016-01-11 22:06:05+00:00): Dear testerx1, I am writing in my capacity as a member of OSMF's Data Working Group. It is against OSM's rules to delete correct information. That this information pertains to objects in military or restricted areas is not reason enough to delete them. Please do not perform such deletions in the past since they will be seen as vandalism. The changesets in which you have deleted objects will have to be reverted. -- Thank you.
freeExec (2016-01-11 11:55:47+00:00): Зачем жилую зону на дорогу тащишь? Тротуар или посадка, вот граница, а не середина дороги. А то похоже, что в раскраску играешь
Supaplex (2016-02-07 09:32:43+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
MKnight (2016-02-20 13:44:21+00:00): Ist dieser Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390789954 mit diesem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178071113
verbunden?
NicolasDumoulin (2016-01-11 09:48:30+00:00): faute de frappe : "cyclistes"
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-11-08 20:18:36+00:00): Ta relacja jest źle skonstruowana: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5851025 
Proszę o poprawienie i cynk, żebym mógł sprawdzić. 
Pozdrawiam
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-11-08 22:00:21+00:00): No dobra, poprawiłem, bo nie ma na co czekać. Ta relacja jest tam zbyteczna.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-11-08 22:08:37+00:00): Podobnież to skrzyżowanie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3939258387 - niepotrzebnie rozrysowane na dwie nitki i napchane było źle zrobionych relacji, powodujących błędny routing.
d3mol3k (2016-11-09 20:06:24+00:00): Dzięki Zbyszku. Dopiero teraz dostałem info o Twoich wpisach. Wiem że swego czasu uaktualniałem tam maxspeed Co do relacji hmmmm nie pamiętam :( chyba że chodziło o destination:sign. Ale fakt faktem chyba rozdzieliłem ja tę drogę w tym miejscu.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-11-11 20:45:42+00:00): Chodziło o to, że w relacji 'nakaz jazdy prosto' dodajemy drogę na wprost (z rolą 'to'), podczas, gdy Ty dodałeś drogę skręcającą w prawo. Efekt był taki, że nawi prowadziła w prawo zamiast prosto, czyli wyszedł efekt odwrotny od zamierzonego.
d3mol3k (2016-11-11 20:48:35+00:00): Swego czasu porobiłem kilka takich błędów - ktoś je znalazł i było na forum - starałem się wszystkie babole poprawić a ten mi umknął - mam nadzieję że był to jeden z ostatnich.
species (2016-01-11 13:36:39+00:00): Heißt das Ding wirklich PizzAria? Kaum zu glauben ;-)
Und die Webseite gehört sicher zu dem Unternehmen? Denn dort ist nix von dieser Filiale zu finden?
IceAgeMike (2016-01-12 11:48:33+00:00): Hallo,

Das ist der Name des neuen Betreibers dort, die Webseite wurde offensichtlich noch nicht aktualisiert. Der operator ist in Pizza Kebab King in Kalsdorf. War dort essen und werde den Rest operator, layer=-1 auch noch nachtragen. Momentan arbeite ich aber mit dem WebEditor, da habe ich dass nicht setzen können.

lg
IceAgeMike
tyr_asd (2016-01-13 10:20:53+00:00): PS: Man kann im iD auch beliebige Tags setzen: Dazu einfach die "All tags" (bzw. "Alle Eigenschaften") ausklappen.
opendcc (2016-01-16 11:27:29+00:00): Hallo,

bitte wenn Du Straßen änderst - löscht und dann neu malst: an das Straßennetz anschließen. 
Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36554508 
und http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36612317 wurde das wieder korrigiert.
user_5359 (2016-01-11 20:12:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 for a better description.
user_5359 (2016-01-11 20:14:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Which kind of business is it? shop=car_repair?
flohoff (2016-01-11 19:11:52+00:00): Hi,
warum hast du in diesem Changeset die Hausnummer von "La Mamma" entfernt und NUR auf das Gebäude gepackt? Das ist ja so quatsch.

Flo
flohoff (2016-01-11 19:13:05+00:00): Ach ja - Und aus 148 ein 146? zu machen ist auch kaputt. Dann entfern das komplett und pack einen Node drauf - Oder auf 146 und einen Node drauf. So hast du aus falschen Daten noch falschere Daten gemacht.

Wenn die Hausnummer nicht klar ist - entfernen - Die doppelte 148 ist auch nicht weiter schlimm. Einfach einen Note drauf. Oder gleich im ALKIS nachsehen.

Flo
OSMiumOxid (2016-01-11 19:28:19+00:00): Zu "La Mamma": Vespucci hat mir hier eine doppelt Hausnummer gemeldet.

Zu #148: Da gabs ein problem mit der Verbindung, weshalb das durcheinander geraten ist. Sorry.
OSMiumOxid (2016-01-11 19:29:28+00:00): Pys: Dank für die Hinweise.
OSMiumOxid (2016-01-11 19:42:37+00:00): Nochmals zu "La Mamma": Seit dem ich die doppelte Hausnummer entfernt habe wird bei mir das kleine POI-Symbol angezeigt, weshalb ich der Ansicht war, es richtig gemacht zu haben
mfg
flohoff (2016-01-11 21:03:23+00:00): Lass Vespucci ruhig Doppelte Hausnummer melden. osmose mag das auch nicht. Ist aber ziemlich egal. Das Gebäude hat eine Hausnummer und der POI hat als zusatzinfo auch die Adresse. Das sollte schon auf beidem sein. Wir haben das auf der OSM-OWL Liste auch schon hinreichend Diskutiert. Wenn dann müssten auch ALLE addr:* tags da runter und nicht nur die Hausnummer. So sind die Daten kaputt.

Wir haben uns in OWL drauf geeinigt das die Adresse auf dem Gebäude ist. Und der POI die Adresse als Zusatzinfo auch trägt. Alle POI informationen sollen auf dem Punkt sein - Wenn das Geschäft die Kneipe schliesst können wir so einfach den node löschen ohne Daten kaputt zu machen.  Eine große Fehlerquelle ist das sortieren der Tags wenn einzelne dinge entfernt werden.

Flo
OSMiumOxid (2016-01-11 21:10:17+00:00): Das klingt logisch. Ich werde mich darum kümmern.
OSMiumOxid (2016-01-11 22:03:11+00:00): Könnte man eventuell einen zusätzlichen node nur für das Symbol setzen?
Zibior2 (2016-10-20 07:42:02+00:00): Co to za szalony pomysł, by sady tagować jako budynki??
species (2016-01-11 19:38:28+00:00): Schau mal, was du aufs Gebäude getaggt hast - oder hat der da Riesengroß seine Werbung drauf? ^^
mcld (2017-02-23 12:22:13+00:00): Hi - thanks for adding the Globe Town marker, but did you notice there's already one in a slightly different location? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3064005585
Do you have any special reason for this location? I think we should merge these two items, or something.
GerdP (2016-01-12 07:06:31+00:00): Hi there!
You changed a highway=footway to highway=was:footway. 
I guess you meant 
was:highway=footway  instead?
MosKartograf (2016-08-04 10:14:15+00:00): Ja. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390808498 Die korrekt Variante ist "was:highway=footway" 
Danke.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41233898
werner2101 (2017-12-24 09:56:08+00:00): Is this change correct? Has the ref been changed twice? First from TF-713 to GM-2 and then back again?
https://www.egomera.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=19175&p=141908&hilit=TF+713+GM+2#p141908

Regards Werner
andrewsh (2016-01-11 12:12:49+00:00): Okay, not German, probably, but Dutch.
andrewsh (2016-01-11 12:13:17+00:00): Okay, and originally an abbreviation:

The name was originally DE SPAR, an acronym of the Dutch phrase Door Eendrachtig Samenwerken Profiteren Allen Regelmati
TomH (2016-01-11 13:32:57+00:00): I assume you followed http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for this mechanical edit?
trigpoint (2016-01-11 16:59:37+00:00): SPAR is an abbreviation as you have mentioned, the shops are signed SPAR, not Spar. This change should be reverted.
andrewsh (2016-01-11 17:00:16+00:00): The company is now called Spar, not SPAR.
TomH (2016-01-11 17:02:29+00:00): So that would be name=SPAR; operator=Spar then.

This is why we ask you to discuss mechanical edits before doing them.
andrewsh (2016-01-11 17:04:16+00:00): Well, if a police department says POLICE on the label, we don't tag it as name=POLICE, do we?
chillly (2016-01-11 17:29:46+00:00): Undiscussed mechanical edits should be reverted.
trigpoint (2016-01-11 17:39:11+00:00): Police is a word, rather than an abbreviation. 
The day the signs on SPAR shops in the UK changes, then local mappers will change the tags.
In the meantime this change needs to be reverted.
trigpoint (2016-01-15 17:45:45+00:00): I have reverted this, the UK community will decide how to correctly tag these shops
TomH (2016-01-11 13:32:59+00:00): I assume you followed http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for this mechanical edit?
andrewsh (2016-01-11 13:54:58+00:00): Well, not quite…
trigpoint (2016-01-11 17:50:38+00:00): Please revert it then
chillly (2016-01-14 14:27:17+00:00): Undiscussed mechanical edits must be reverted.
andrewsh (2016-01-15 17:41:29+00:00): Sorry, I haven't yet had time to revert it. I will try during the weekend.
trigpoint (2016-01-15 17:43:43+00:00): I have already reverted it, the UK community will work out how they should be tagged.

Thanks
andrewsh (2016-01-15 17:46:13+00:00): Right, having googled that I see this is a topic already discussed and quite a controversial one.
andrewsh (2016-01-15 17:57:50+00:00): Actually, one of your comments isn't quite right:

> ALDI, LIDL, ASDA and SPAR are all abbreviations of their full names, in
the same way as NATO, AIDS, BBC, OSM or GNU are.

Except Lidl isn't :)
joost schouppe (2016-01-13 07:16:59+00:00): si vous gardez quelque chose dans la base Openstreemap, ce n'est plus un test. C'est dans la base pout tout le monde. Mais de vrais contributions son super bienvenues!
bhavani1 (2019-03-07 04:11:52+00:00): "Hi Serpico,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the floating ways
way 390759531
way 390810368  classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery we don't find any connectivity.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
Serpico (2019-03-07 15:02:04+00:00): Hi,
Regarding 390759531, I checked on the DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery using JOSM (zoom scale 25m), just left of the South/East extremity of 390759531 we can see a dam.
Actually  390759531 follow a ditch that takes water from there, several narrow bridges/passerelle ( I can count 4 of them up the ditch to the closest hamlet on the southside of the ditch ) cross that ditch to the other side.
My guess is 390759531 just wasn't traced yet.
About 390810368, from what I see it connects to 390810366 about 10 meters north, but with the foliage we would be tracing it blind as it is...
way 390789848, I can see it past node 3939246861
way 390789850, I can't see it except around node 5388919143
arvdk (2018-03-19 22:56:06+00:00): Can you please comment your changes? Also the source please, because you seemed to have mapped ways over private property. ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Daan%20Wagner )
jptolosa (2016-01-15 21:19:43+00:00): Hay que tener cuidado antes de unir algunos segmentos, ya que se pueden destruir algunos multipolígonos como el Santuario de la Naturaleza Península de Hualpén en este caso.
Saludos.
Corre_cl (2016-01-15 21:23:08+00:00): Mil disculpas y gracias por el aviso, estaremos más atentos a eso.
Saludos,
jptolosa (2016-01-16 00:02:25+00:00): No te preocupes, es para que sepas solamente. Los objetos grandes en su mayoría están representados por multipolígonos, que son polígonos formados por varias líneas que en conjuntos forman un polígono, ya que por la cantidad de nodos (puntos) o en algunos casos cuando tienen "agujeros" no se pueden representar en una única área simple. Entonces si el multipolígono queda abierto no se renderiza en el mapa.
Saludos.
Paul Berry (2016-05-25 15:53:54+00:00): Is this not Cann Hall?
SK53 (2016-05-25 17:50:55+00:00): Both names seem to be old names of the former CP of Wanstead. I seriously doubt if they have any relevance now http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/essex/vol6/pp317-322
*Martin* (2016-01-12 08:52:54+00:00): Ahoj Jasovmapper.

Prosim odstran name a name:en z tej skolky. Do name sa dava VLASTNE meno objektu, nie VSEOBECNE. Uz tag amenity=kindergarden vravi ze to je skolka a dokonca bez zavyslosti na jazyku. Dakujem.
jasovmapper (2016-01-13 09:33:23+00:00): ahoj OK opravene
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-11 11:23:44+00:00): Hi, Kenoz. I changed the classification of the road (way 390815549) to be unclassified highway
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Richard (2016-01-11 15:04:58+00:00): Hi,

Is there a reason you're moving place nodes to arbitrary locations like this?

OSM guidance is that nodes should be sited "in the perceived centre of the place, for example the town or village square to the central in terms of facilities and/or transport routes or next any appropriate central monument". (See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Places .)

This is particularly important for routing - e.g. if someone asks for a route from Canning Town to Ipswich, they will expect to start in the centre of the area, not on a road adjacent to a primary school.
crossmyloof (2016-01-12 13:08:32+00:00): Hi there,

Sorry, I missed that in the guidance. 

I had moved the place nodes to the centre of the area based on a triangulation of boundaries. 

Some of the more suburban districts obviously have no central point but I see the argument with places like Canning Town.

I will review the changes I have made and sort the appropriate nodes.

Apologies again, CML
trigpoint (2016-01-12 13:17:05+00:00): Also bear in mind that placing the node too far away from a routable way will break routing.
The centres may not be obvious to a remote mapper, but I tend to assume local mappers had placed the nodes where they were for a reason
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Hjart (2016-01-11 19:05:39+00:00): Rør venligst ikke ved adressenoderne. De bliver importeret og opdateret via div. scripts og ifølge loven har de faktisk ikke noget med evt bygninger at gøre.
simonmikkelsen-dk (2016-01-11 20:06:16+00:00): Tak fordi du kigger efter.
Jeg havde læst (kan desværre ikke finde kilden, mente det var http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet men den anbefaler ikke den ene over den anden) at det var mere velset at gøre sådan end at lave en relation mellem dem. Der var endda en henvisning til en JOSM-plugin som jeg brugte, der flytter tagsne og sletter adressenoden.

Hvad er den bedste måde at rette op på det?
For min skyld er det bedst at reverte hele det change set jeg har lavet, men ud fra hvad jeg kan læse, er jeg nok ikke én som bør gøre det.
Hjart (2016-01-11 20:48:00+00:00): Jeg følger ofte med på http://osm.expandable.dk :-). Så vidt jeg forstår er DK det eneste land der importerer alle officielle adressenoder og det eneste der foretrækker at adresser og bygninger holdes adskilte.
Jeg har ikke set nogen i DK lave specielle relationer mellem bygninger og adresser. Jeg har set associatedStreet i brug, men der er ikke nogen herhjemme der bruger det og jeg kan heller ikke lige se behovet.
Jeg kan gøre det at jeg kalder adressenoderne tilbage og sletter alt andet end building=* fra polygonerne.
Hjart (2016-01-11 20:54:01+00:00): Det danske fællesskab bad i sin tid om at den plugin du nævner ikke per default flytter data over fra en eksisterende node over på en ny bygning. Det har hjulpet meget på situationen :-)
Hjart (2016-01-11 21:19:46+00:00): Ok, jeg har reverteret dit rettesæt og gentegnet bygningerne. Det andet viste sig at være lidt besværligt
simonmikkelsen-dk (2016-01-12 14:25:33+00:00): Mange tak. Du havde nu ikke behøvet at gentegne bygningerne :-)
Jeg har prøvet om jeg kunne finde en side med retningslinier for Danmark, men det er ikke lykkedes. Kan du pege mig hen på den?
Som softwaremand skærer det lidt ikke at koble bygninger sammen med deres adresser, men det gør nu den import meget lettere, så jeg kan godt forstå det. Så kan man bare slette alle adresser og hive dem ind igen, i stedet for at skulle håndtere en masse situationer hvis man fletter dem sammen.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:48:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:48:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Владимир К (2016-05-16 08:40:25+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364555188/history это прям приём на переработку? Или обычный контейнер для мусора?
sergeybe (2016-05-18 18:46:47+00:00): В Крыму почти везде в городах стоят раздельные контейнеры для мусора и пластмассы (бутылки из под газ воды и пива и т.д.). Пластмасса идет на вторичную переработку.
Владимир К (2016-05-19 12:25:36+00:00): Круто, буду знать. Значит, отмечаю что он для пластиковых бутылок?
sergeybe (2016-05-19 17:29:50+00:00): Да, можно отметить. Как я понял эти контейнеры для любой пластмассы.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:48:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
GerdP (2016-01-12 07:33:21+00:00): Hi there!
You have created a single node with
highway=path,name=Kroken.
Do you plan to draw the way later or was it a typo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3939626328
smaprs (2016-01-11 16:06:54+00:00): A tag layer é para coisas sobrepostas em níveis, como 2 ou mais vias em viadutos (veja no estádio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390831730) . Se você quis dizer pavimentos, veja a tag http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:48:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:48:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:47:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Nakaner-repair (2017-12-24 16:48:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54891463 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets by user fanzinies which mention the Garmin TOPO map for Germany version 7 as source.
Peda (2016-03-23 00:17:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38010440 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import - please adhere to the import guidelines and do only use sources permitted to use
*Martin* (2016-01-12 09:06:28+00:00): Ahoj Mirkos

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390840385 - to všetci košičania chodia do práce po tej ceste?  Či je to hlavná košická cesta do práce? ;-)

Prosím nedavaj do verejnej mapy svoje čisto súkromné trasy a poznámky. Tvoj changeset pre istotu revertnem.

Pred prvým mapovaním si prosím naštuduj http://wiki.freemap.sk/StarterGuide a na wiki.osm.org návody ako správne mapovať. Tiež si pozri ako sú už v mape zmapované iné veci. Ak máš otázky či pochybnosti, prosím píš do google groups osm_sk. Ďakujem.
Peda (2016-03-23 00:17:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38010440 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import - please adhere to the import guidelines and do only use sources permitted to use
user_5359 (2016-01-11 18:51:50+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ist der https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390842438#map=19/53.10761/8.45373&layers=N immer noch eine Grundschule? Dann müsste noch ein amenity=school an das Gebäude.
0ldNerd (2016-01-12 17:13:00+00:00): Hallo, ja. Das Gebäude ist aktuell (noch) die katholische Grundschule. Ein Umzug ist in den nächsten beiden Jahren geplant, da die Gemeinde das Areal zu Geld machen will.
ivanbranco (2022-01-03 13:42:15+00:00): Hi kseltar, I know is a 6 years old changesets but I found an invalid place value here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3939808395/history
seems like it could be an alt_name or a description=*, could you check it out?
Peda (2016-03-23 00:17:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38010440 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import - please adhere to the import guidelines and do only use sources permitted to use