piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-09-30 11:32:35+00:00): Na zes jaar weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangenn. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-28 07:05:30+00:00): I have a small question about this ancient edit and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2386544424/history

what you think nowadays about shop=white_goods and osm.wiki/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dappliance ?

Would it be fine to retag this object to shop=appliance or is shop=white_goods describing something else or is actually preferable?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-28 07:09:04+00:00): sorry, something went wrong with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dappliance and osm.org/node/2386544424/history - linking again
hlfan (2025-12-08 10:45:22+00:00): what exactly went wrong? /s

Nice to see we don't need to worry about linking that again soon.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-08 11:45:06+00:00): > what exactly went wrong?

now difference is not visible, as osm.org changed how linking works

few months ago first links (without https prefix) were not working
malenki (2015-09-24 19:51:48+00:00): Hallo Karoline,

was hat es mit diesem Gebäuderest auf sich?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242707871

Gruß
malenki
naoliv (2016-04-29 23:08:40+00:00): William, você lembra o que utilizou para obter o nome das ruas?
syntex (2022-01-06 09:31:55+00:00): Nie chcę kasować tego IPC Business Center, ale ewidentnie nie pasuje on zbytnio do obrysów EGIB. Czy mógłbyś go trochę poprawić? Ja nie znam się na modelowaniu 3D i dlatego nie jestem pewien jak to powinno wyglądać.
GUFSZ (2015-03-14 16:42:09+00:00): Ich hoffe das der cycelway an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242719711 vererbt ist und nicht von dir stammt. Die blauen Radwegzeichen fehlen komplett und der Weg ist für den landwirschaftlichen Verkehrfreigegeben.
mueschel (2015-03-14 16:47:48+00:00): Der cycleway stammt wohl vom sechs Jahre älteren Weg 10807865. Ich hatte den Weg nur wegen dem Brückenbau gesplittet.
friedl (2015-01-22 16:07:23+00:00): Hallo!
Ist der Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29488660 wirklich eine Einbahnstraße? Scheint mir etwa ungewöhnlich.
Spaziergeher (2015-01-22 20:36:28+00:00): Nein, sondern mein Fehler bei der Eingabe!
pnorman (2015-07-21 01:05:20+00:00): You've indicated Google is the source for this as well as another changeset. Unfortunately, Copyright and Google's terms don't let us take their data or use their products. Did you use Google as a source for any other changes?

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
abellao (2015-07-21 04:41:33+00:00): Hello Paul,

No, this is the only edit where I used the Google imagery.
aharvey (2018-05-22 04:22:08+00:00): I appreciate your effort mapping this out, but it isn't a building, it's just a roof, I've changed the tagging and deleted some of the ways which weren't building features.
syntex (2021-10-08 19:17:34+00:00): I ten punkt testowy się ostał 8 lat : )
kaltuna (2020-09-27 06:13:39+00:00): Hallo, schaust Du dir bitte mal folgenden Hinweismarker an ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2181593

Es geht um die Höfchenschneise, die im östlichen Teil so geschrieben wird und im östlichen Teil "Höfgenschneise". In diesem Changeset hattest Du damals den Namen des östlichen Teils in der Schreibweise von "ch" auf "g" geändert. Ist das so richtig ? Oder hattest Du vor, die gesamte Schneise in der Benamung zu ändern ?
Viele Grüße !!
aharvey (2015-03-12 03:47:03+00:00): In this changeset you changed a pipeline to a road. I won't revert it because you made another change at the same time, but I will fix this mistake.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-02 22:59:26+00:00): Choć edycja jest dawna, to widzę, że jesteś jeszcze aktywny.

Mam prośbę. Te highway=track to powinno być highway=residential+surface=unpaved.

Track to drogi polne czy leśne. Jest tego dużo w okolicy i należy to poprawić, niektóre nawigacje odmawiają prowadzenia przez track (bo w końcu kto by chciał jechać przez pole? :D)
MCDA (2016-07-28 08:52:24+00:00): Why are you removing members from the Sliabh Beagh Route 1 - McKenna Trail (1689109) relation?
trial (2019-06-14 19:28:25+00:00): For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242856225 I guess you mean leisure=sauna instead of name=sauna
utack (2015-12-26 10:16:48+00:00): Are you sure
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242862368
is meant to be a shop=restaurant?
It looks like a parking lot on the bing imagery, and if there is a restaurant it would be amenity=restaurant
Parzelle13 (2018-09-05 17:22:55+00:00): Name ist nicht für Beschreibungen o.ä. gedacht, also "Im Breiten Busch 1" als
Name bitte wieder entfernen. Straße und Hausnummer sind über die addr-Tags bereits richtig erfasst. 
Lektüre: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht...
RicoElectrico (2022-09-12 02:43:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3354556
d1g (2015-04-02 13:02:10+00:00): Этот пакет был отрисован без использования смещения, придётся передвинуть по 3.44; 3.62:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков
GerdP (2015-10-31 05:57:47+00:00): Bitte prüfen:
Diverse nodes sind als
highway=public_transport
lit=yes
getaggt, scheinen aber einfach
highway=street_lamp zu sein.
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-09-14 06:35:47+00:00): Hi AnhLongVN. I changed geometry of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/242963348). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
maraf24 (2017-11-30 19:59:33+00:00): Tutaj również przypadkowo przeciągnąłeś punkt.
maraf24 (2017-11-30 19:59:58+00:00): Sorry, nie ten changeset:) (u nie ten autor)
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-09-02 23:29:12+00:00): Hi AnhLongVN. I changed the classification and geometry  of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/242967158). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
GerdP (2015-12-07 07:55:19+00:00): Hi there!
You often use(d) 
natural=managed forest
Why don't you use 
landuse=forest or natural=wood instead?
Tyrese Wormely (2019-12-03 16:39:08+00:00): Raceway in Gardendale off Fieldstown Rd. needs to be removed from the map. It's no longer open.
nickvet419 (2017-01-31 09:50:49+00:00): we map anything on osm
Jojo4u (2015-04-11 17:17:39+00:00): Hallo msowen, diese Straße ist nur durch eine relativ kurze Verkehrsinsel baulich getrennt, das rechtfertigt keine zwei getrennten Wege. Passend ist hier traffic_calming=island. Die Wege wurden inzwischen wieder zusammengefügt.

LG Joachim
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-03-01 08:10:15+00:00): Hi Kenoz,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/243052708) based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you, happy mapping!
RicoElectrico (2016-01-26 16:33:51+00:00): Skąd Ci się tu wziął Euronet w biedronkowym bankomacie? Tam jest zdaje się Global Cash.
BlaueBlüte (2015-07-03 05:38:02+00:00): What’s the point of way 243206587 with the single tag “area=yes”?
user_11166885 (2020-07-05 14:57:19+00:00): Al posto di tutte queste aree residenziali non era meglio farne una grande che comprendesse l'intero abitato di Palmanova? Anche con gli inner ed outer.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-02-28 06:03:29+00:00): Could the Japanese taps be tagged amenity=drinking_water, access=public ?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-14 15:44:31+00:00): ¿El nombre de este pueblo es KM 47 o es solo el letrero de Km en la carretera?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-13 15:21:21+00:00): What is the source and license of this data?

(see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/sym#values for general mess remaining for cleanup)
marczoutendijk (2023-01-24 13:53:10+00:00): I have asked Black_Scorpion for an explanation of that tagging.  
Also pointed them to this changeset with the questions above.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-07 13:36:14+00:00): Has they responded? If not, how long we should wait? 3 months? 1 year? As long as OSM mappers waited with complaining after import?
marczoutendijk (2023-04-07 14:21:32+00:00): KM 47 was added 9 years ago and there was never any response from the mapper who created that object. 
The mapper that changed it (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ecuador%20Tur) stopped editing 5 years ago. 
Mapper Black_Scorpion is hardly active and there is no response from them to expect...
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-21 07:53:59+00:00): In such case it should be reverted, I guess
marczoutendijk (2023-09-21 08:55:58+00:00): Another user was active around that area and I have asked them (today) for a possible explanation of that naming.
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-21 09:45:22+00:00): I am more worried about license status....
marczoutendijk (2023-09-21 13:42:29+00:00): The sym=Dot tag is a leftover from a Garmin GPX track that obviously was used to import that data into OSM.
In the early OSM days Garmin GPX track were often used to import data that was perfectly legal because it was collected by the mappers themselves. We simply cannot tell what other (possibly illegal) sources were used 10 years ago.
LLAQWA (2023-09-29 15:32:09+00:00): En el "Plan de desarollo y ordamiento territorial de la parroquia Wilfrido Loor Moreira" se llaman este sitio "El Cuarenta y Siete"
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-14 06:38:16+00:00): Hello!

Would it be safe to replace surface=unsurfaced with more standard surface=unpaved  on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26787511/history ?
pnorman (2015-07-21 01:05:10+00:00): You've indicated Google is the source for this as well as another changeset. Unfortunately, Copyright and Google's terms don't let us take their data or use their products. Did you use Google as a source for any other changes?

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
pangoSE (2018-08-09 21:10:20+00:00): Vilken amenity är C156?
DK7080BE (2018-08-10 00:33:02+00:00): highway=emergency_access_point
https://www.respektforvand.dk/i-vandet/paa-stranden/redningsnumre
pangoSE (2018-08-11 09:34:16+00:00): Super, ser at du har fixet det allerede :)
DUGA (2021-02-28 03:33:10+00:00): I'd like to get the source of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243337051. Please tell me if possible.
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-03 09:52:57+00:00): Das access-Tagging an der L 3273 halte ich für falsch, insbesondere das foot=no. Ist da wirklich eine VERBOT für Fußgänger ausgeschildert? Als ich letztes Mal da vorbeikam, war keines zu sehen, und das war 2017. Das Tagging zwingt Fußgänger-Navis zu vollkommen unsinnigen Umwegen, wenn sie nicht mal für ein paar hundert Meter diese Straße nutzen dürfen. Gibt es so was woanders auch noch?
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-03 10:00:29+00:00): Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.19251794&lng=8.31291625&z=17&pKey=rV4Ue2h6FGBp3KNWnsVgRw&focus=photo - westlicher Ortsausgang Lenzhahn: Da steht ein Schild „Straßenverengung“, aber ein Fußgängerverbot sehe ich da nicht. Das Tagging ist also komplett falsch und destruktiv, denn danach dürften Wanderer nicht mal die 50 Meter bis zum nächsten Feldweg auf der Straße laufen, während sie tatsächlich bis Niederseelbach und weiter gehen dürfen, wenn sie wollen! Also was soll das?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-21 01:35:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2507821918/history has FIXME = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2021-01-07 03:35:47+00:00): Hi Jack Pham,
I've adjusted the highway (way-243369917) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
thank you
kreuzschnabel (2018-06-28 08:35:25+00:00): tourism=alpine_hut stimmt für das Waldhaus sicher nicht. Das ist doch keine einsame Unterkunft fernab der Zivilisation in ansonsten lebensfeindlicher Umgebung (nehme ich an).
yzemaze (2016-12-18 20:45:59+00:00): Hi,
there are many untagged ways in this area that could be fences or hedges. Do you still know what you did map (or intended to) in 2012/13?
Ben (2016-12-21 13:16:38+00:00): Anything blank is unknown, or unfinished, or both, and is awaiting further editing.  If you can be more specific I'll take a look.
yzemaze (2016-12-21 13:32:39+00:00): There are too many ways to list them all. Just download the area between Brackley Road and Kipling Drive for example. There are dozens of untagged ways which could be plot boundaries. A note wouldn’t hurt...
btw: Some ways are tagged with alignment=b. Alignment for aerial images? Still needed?
Ben (2016-12-21 19:15:14+00:00): The alignment =a/b/c are for searching and auto squaring up in Josm when adding new data.  Everything which is squared up together is tagged the same.   I will take a look at the data when I have some time, but try looking at it against the Bing aerial images and it should be apparent what it is.
aBirba (2021-04-30 14:33:40+00:00): Nombre correcto es "Sant Pere d'Aüira"
voschix (2018-08-08 10:52:15+00:00): This changeset contains a large number of trees that do not correspond to real objects on the grounds (example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2508848737
which is part of a road-side tree-row, but only about one-in-three is in the data,). I Please consider reverting the trees from this import.
Oskarst_ (2024-02-28 09:19:39+00:00): Hei, 
Det har kommet en merknad om at way 243515217 ikke finnes. Sitter du på noe info om denne?
d1g (2015-04-09 12:13:38+00:00): Техническая улица, 12аб
Техническая улица, 14б

КОНЕЧНО.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-10 19:06:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181479929/history - czy są jakikolwiek ślady tych torów w terenie?

Czy są one do skasowania?
Nosyrin (2019-08-31 15:03:36+00:00): Здравствуйте
Дороги вне населённых пунктов не погут быть residential
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-16 07:40:23+00:00): Hallo calli84, ich weiß, es ist eine Ewigkeit her, aber mit diesem Tagging sperrt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2424162349 alle Verkehrsarten, auch Fußgänger. Das würde aber den Rettungspunkt weiter östlich fast sinnlos machen. Weißt du noch, wer da durch darf? Fußgänger? Radfahrer? Reiter?
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:32:31+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243565311
has no tags. What is it?
GerdP (2015-11-12 10:41:31+00:00): please help me to understand:
what is meant with highway=virtual ?
This is rarely used and not documented.
I am not a local, but the two ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52656173
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243577796
seem to be one way with 
highway=path
surface=paved
moped=yes
foot=yes
bicycle=yes
alv (2015-11-12 17:07:59+00:00): Here, path, footway and others seem unfitting, because the primary Vihdintie is not allowed for pedestrians and cyclists; little to the south and in the junction with Kaupintie (north) there are compulsory foot and cycleway signs (and also next to the ways leading away from the bus stop). (There's also a guard rail between the carriageways, so crossing the road is not even possible.)

The only reason why some sort of connection between the platform and the main carriageway is needed, is that those signs have an additional sign "mopeds allowed", i.e. anyone driving a moped towards south can either select the cycleway back at the Kaupintie junction, or they can turn off (right) at the bus stop. (I'm not certain if they can even continue southwest to the end of Meijeritie, but unlikely to survey there anytime soon.)

It's too different from the "general catch-all way for all nonmotorized" (or what was it) as path is being consumed, so I wouldn't want to use that. If it weren't for the mopeds, there wouldn't be anything. This tag was just a way to tell that it's a linear traversable way, that doesn't exist as a 'separate' physical element.
GerdP (2015-11-12 17:22:48+00:00): well, when you think that path doesn't match, why is footway used for the longer part? For me, path is a way that can be used by foot and one-track vehicles like moped,mofa, bicycle, maybe also by horse riders. The tag highway=virtual sounds might also mean something like
"unbuilt", "not found", "proposed" etc.
Thats why I think that you should not use
an undocumented type for a normal road.
alv (2015-11-12 19:53:40+00:00): It is a footway (quacks like "mainly for pedestrians") to and from the bus stop?
GerdP (2015-11-12 20:13:23+00:00): quite confusing: 
highway=footway
bicycle=designated
Anyway, I hoped that you agree to use standard tags, seems I have no luck here ;-)
b-holdet (2020-03-22 06:59:09+00:00): Hej Styker
Navnet "Tyrkerøen", som du har angivet her, har du en kilde på det?
Det lader til at andre OSM-mappere ikke er enige med navnet.
Med venlig hilsen
Flemming
Tntdruid (2020-04-17 21:26:46+00:00): Der er ingen info på nettet om det navn.
Styker (2020-04-17 22:27:57+00:00): Jeg kan ikke længere finde kilden til min oplysning. Jeg kan huske at øen var navngivet efter Frederik 7. broholmer hunde, der alle hed Tyrk.
b-holdet (2020-04-18 08:58:40+00:00): Det lyder som et sted at lede efter navnet.
Tak for tilbagemeldingen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-21 08:11:07+00:00): Sorry for bothering you about a very old change but I have question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243592149#map=17/51.444497/0.1629802layers=N - Why this is not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tPd for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
Derick Rethans (2018-01-02 10:41:56+00:00): I think it was already mapped like this, and I just changed the geometry. I've changed it to  highway=steps (and added the incline direction)
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-02 14:35:39+00:00): Thanks!
Percherie (2020-10-13 18:23:33+00:00): Bonsoir Virgile,

Je suis en train de reprendre les lignes de train qui passe par Narbonne et ça m'amène jusqu'à la gare de Marseille : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Voies_ferrées

C'est la première fois que je vois le nom des voies sur les arrêts au lieu du nom de la gare.
Comme le nom des quai où attendent les voyageur indique le nom des voies, est ce que je peut modifier le nom des arrêts de la même façon que les arrêts de bus et de tram reprennent le nom de l'arrêt et pas la voies.
Utiliser le nom des voies remonte leur noms dans tous les relations sans qu'on puisse savoir quel gare est caché derrière (imagine 5 gares traversée avec "voie A")

En attente de ton retour... si tu veut on peut échanger via messagerie et tu poste la conclusion sur le changeset.

Cordialement, Joël
Virgile1994 (2020-10-13 22:45:54+00:00): Ce changeset date bien... Oui, en "name" il faut bien mettre le nom de l'arrêt.
Le numéro/lettre de quai, y'a le tag "local_ref" qui existe désormais pour ça !
eggie (2020-04-01 18:48:23+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvange zie ik. daarom.. opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2017-06-29 19:51:41+00:00): PB gestuurd.. opnieuw welkom
vademecum (2016-04-14 18:42:16+00:00): one hint for you concerning denomination=La Grotta della Beaume: denonimation is NOT relating to the name, but to the special kind of religion. This grotta could be:
denomination=roman_catholic
name=La Grotta della Beaume
Please check with local knowlegde.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2023-05-12 15:17:02+00:00): Where is name Wurzelstalagnitenhöle from? And any Czech name???
fell3 (2023-05-15 09:18:39+00:00): Habe leider keine Ahnung, woher der Name kommt. Der Namenseintrag stammt nicht von mir.
mstriewe (2015-10-04 12:27:57+00:00): There are some street lamps along Bulwar Filadelfijski in this changeset tagged with "eihgt=5.5". That's supposed to be "height=5.5", isn't it?
syntex (2021-06-13 13:15:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243789833/history To nie jest mur miejski
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-07-27 01:41:06+00:00): Hi AnhLongVN,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/243813733) based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you, happy mapping!
SK53 (2023-03-21 14:34:21+00:00): Hi Paul,

Can you remember why you used maxcgwrating (or similar) on Mayfield Ave off Kenton parade in this changeset? Someone has 'regularised' the values & I suspect has lost something.

J
Paul The Archivist (2023-03-22 21:37:16+00:00): Yes this has been changed to something that is completely wrong. It's not a maximum weight limit, but as I understand it this is a limit on HGVs which are rated as being allowed to carry that weight. So a lorry which is permitted to carry 7.5 tonnes (or any permitted to carry a higher load) in this case is not allowed on the road even if it was considerably lighter than that - it's basically a lorry ban though some small lorries (rated less than 7.5T) are allowed. They are quite common - known as environmental weight restrictions - e.g. most of Derby is covered by these restrictions though with 'except for access' plates underneath so that they can deliver to businesses in the city. 

I tagged this road following the proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/gross_weight, but this has since been simplified as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweightrating. The restriction only applies to HGVs not to buses etc, so in this case the correct tag would be maxweightrating:hgv=7.5 following the updated proposal. I'm not sure about the none@destination conditional restriction tag which was added later - there was no 'except for access' sign when I surveyed it - as indicated by my note tag, but that may have changed since.

Cheers,
Paul
Владимир К (2015-12-28 14:50:51+00:00): Неплохо бы пешеходные дорожки и лестницы хоть как то присоединить к автомобильным дорогам, это важно для навигации
utack (2016-02-01 20:14:16+00:00): Hi,
ist die Relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3297221
absichtlich ein "multipolygon"
MfG
Wolle DD (2016-02-02 08:29:56+00:00): Ja, damals war es falsch mehreren Objekten die gleiche Adresse zu geben. Das wurde dann so gelöst. Mittlerweile hat sich das geändert...
utack (2016-02-02 15:01:57+00:00): Das mit der Adresse macht ja auch Sinn, ich fand nur seltsam dass der typ dann ein "multipolygon" aus einzelnen Punkten ist.
Aber dann weiß ich bescheid
Durko_freemap (2014-11-05 09:04:30+00:00): Ahoj Martin,
podla udajov ziskanych od obecneho uradu Gelnica sa cesta vola Perlová, ak suhlasis, name celej cesty by som takto nastavil, Durko
Janjko (2015-01-10 15:52:42+00:00): Je li ovdje stvarno ima tunel? Nekakva pećina ili što? Izgleda kao da je dugačak otprilike kilometar.
naoliv (2016-01-20 13:52:56+00:00): Qual fonte você utilizou para colocar o nome das ruas, por favor?
nyuriks (2017-01-31 07:20:37+00:00): Hi, in 4 subsequent changes, you removed all of the ways from the relation 182152. Is it needed, or should it be deleted?
nickvet419 (2017-01-31 09:35:08+00:00): Looks like a new relation was created for the base and attached to a fence  feature.
ChristianA (2021-10-11 06:14:07+00:00): Hej. Det är väldigt mycket restriktioner satta på vägarna här. Är det verkligen förbud mot att cykla på vägarna? Det har jag aldrig sett i Sverige.
På flera vägar är det även både "access=private" samt "motor_vehicle=private". Är det enskild väg där bara boende får köra bil så räcker det med "motor_vehicle=private".
XimeX (2018-08-18 19:31:36+00:00): Warum hast du die "Hohe Wand-Straße" in "Hohe-Wand-Straße" unbenannt?
Laut Basemap.at ist "Hohe Wand-Straße" korrekt.
Du hast aber "Hohe Wand-Straße" in den alt_name Tag gepackt