piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adam Franco (2020-03-05 19:19:32+00:00): Hi @Westmore, welcome back to OSM. I'm not sure if you meant to do this, but it looks like you created a new relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10755108 for Balance Rock Road in addition to the way for the road. If you don't have a reason for adding the relation, it can probably be deleted to simplify things.

Cheers,
Adam
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81521170
stevea (2020-03-21 05:55:14+00:00): WTF!?  Who are YOU to say these "don't exist" when you only assert they are not "LegalTrailsOnly."  I'm reverting this vandalism of redaction and you should be ashamed of your OSM self.
LegalTrailsOnly (2020-03-21 14:32:47+00:00): they are illegal trails you will be ticketed for riding them and they shouldn’t be advertised on OSM.
stevea (2020-03-21 18:42:52+00:00): They are trails and they have every right to be mapped, especially as they are mapped with access=no.  If you KNOW that trails are "illegal" then tag them as such with access=no.

However, you may NOT remove them from OSM with a heavy-handed, "let's make what truly exists invisible" attitude like you are the "trail police."

These are not being "advertised" in OSM.  They are being "stated as existing" in OSM.  That's all a map does:  it asserts the existence of a feature.  You are welcome to "richen up" any feature on the map with an additional tag that adds an additional semantic (like access=private or access=no), but you may NOT simply delete these from the map.

I am not the only person in OSM watching your activities to assure you don't continue to do this.  Please abide by what OSM is:  a MAP.  OSM is not your mother shaking her finger at you, a fence, the police or God issuing a Commandment.  So, please, don't delete, rather, tag properly.
Allison P (2020-12-12 23:38:09+00:00): I don't know how I didn't notice this until 10 months later but a node on Jefferson Street got dragged a bit. Working on fixing it.
TravGW (2020-02-27 02:46:32+00:00): I'm going to have to ask you to stop adding so many parks. Not every open grass area is a park. You have also changed objects to parks. This is a public map and many people rely on it. Please make sure your edits add value to the map.
TravGW (2020-02-27 02:46:48+00:00): Voy a tener que pedirte que dejes de agregar tantos parques. No todas las áreas de césped abierto son un parque. También ha cambiado objetos a parques. Este es un mapa público y muchas personas confían en él. Asegúrese de que sus ediciones agreguen valor al mapa.
Hjart (2020-02-27 10:24:00+00:00): Begræns dig helst til max et land per changeset
Chris Fleming (2020-02-27 10:43:46+00:00): Agree! (Hello from Scotland!) 

google translate: 
Enig! (Hej fra Skotland!)
mini-me (2020-02-27 12:07:15+00:00): Здравствуйте! У вас проспект Ветеранов "уплыл". https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3536027766
Снимки Bing и Maxar в этом смысле очень плохие. Лучше выравнивать по Esri.
loveshack (2020-07-18 13:40:02+00:00): The house postcode looks as if it should be GL54 1JQ, not 1JT (e.g. on Zoopla).
Frecks (2020-07-18 14:11:36+00:00): Having checked on the Postcode finder, you re correct, so I've changed it. Companies House data is wrong. Thanks
sovereign_ch (2020-02-26 23:58:14+00:00): Hoi. Ich weiss nicht was für einen Mist iD vorschlägt, da ich nicht mit iD arbeite, aber die stop_area-Relationen haben absolut nichts in anderen ÖV-Relationen verloren. Solchen Unsinn dringend ignorieren und bleiben lassen. Ebenso wie Vorschläge, die nicht im wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport=stop_area) dokumentiert sind, das produziert nur Fehler und ist für die Katz. 'platform' ist entweder PTv2-node oder PTv2-way aber nicht beides. Und PTv1 kann damit schon mal gar nichts anfangen - reine Zeitverschwendung. Bitte bleiben lassen kostet nur Zeit solche Fehler wieder auszubügeln. Nicht böse nehmen und Gruss
realtroplin (2020-02-27 07:11:39+00:00): Hoi sovereign_ch, danke für die Kommentare und sorry für die zusätzliche Arbeit.

Den Node habe ich wie in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Public_transport#Busse beschrieben aus Kompatibilitätsgründen belassen. Die Attribute, die nicht zu highway=bus_stop gehören, hätte ich wohl entfernen sollen.

Das Hinzufügen der stop_area-Relation zur route-Relation ist auf meinem Mist gewachsen. Ich habe im Wiki die entsprechenden Angaben nicht gefunden und es dann so gemacht, wie es mir am sinnvollsten schien. Das werde ich in Zukunft sorgfältiger nachlesen müssen.
MAlfare (2020-02-27 21:43:12+00:00): Was soll dieser Blödsinn?
OSM ist kein Kinderspielplatz!
jumbanho (2020-02-27 23:44:39+00:00): I'm removing this node that appears as "WE HAVE A WINDOW"  There is no military area and this does not appear to represent a real object.
evod (2020-03-08 10:42:44+00:00): Hi, sind Pelzgasse und Goldschlagstrße hier wirklich keine Einbahne mehr? Oder wolltest du nur mapen, dass die Einbahnen für Radfahrer geöffnet sind?
lloudspeaker (2020-03-08 12:30:25+00:00): Ja, die beiden sind keine Einbahnen mehr. Bin via StreetView draufgekommen, dann vor Ort verifiziert.
evod (2020-03-16 09:10:35+00:00): Ich war gestern vor Ort, beide Straßen sind (wieder?) Einbahnen - ich korrigiere das gleich. LG!
literan (2020-02-27 19:15:07+00:00): не надо ставить тег для развилки автодорог на пути метро. Дождетесь, что придется ваши правки откатывать, если будете упорствовать
mueschel (2020-02-29 10:33:57+00:00): Hi,
what are the fuel tags you added here?
  fuel:fuelsave = yes
  fuel:vpower = yes
These are not common - please check the Wiki for the common names of these types of fuel:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Afuel
Thanks!
Mig_Imperial (2020-02-29 13:29:56+00:00): Copy. Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 11:15:27+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=regional;c
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7246495319/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=regional
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
kubahahaha (2022-06-13 22:11:02+00:00): Nie powinieneś dodawać do wszystkich węzłów tagu layer=1, tylko do linii oznaczających drogi (mosty)
B_KSL (2022-06-15 19:53:03+00:00): Tak, wiem. Też już często usuwałem cudze layer=1 z węzłów. Tym razem jakimś cudem, zupełnie nieświadomie sam spaprałem. Dzięki za poprawki
mbethke (2020-03-02 14:16:22+00:00): This looks to be in the middle of nowhere, although the imagery might be outdated of course. Are you sure of the location?
Jordi MF (2020-02-29 20:44:06+00:00): Hola,

Gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM. He visto que has modificado la Plaça Guillem Agulló como si fuera un parque. Esta zona, como indica su propio nombre, no es un parque, es una plaza. Puedes consultar la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park). Una plaza debe mapearse como una zona peatonal (area=yes + highway=pedestrian + place=square).

Si tienes cualquier duda, puedes consultar a la comunidad de OSM a través de su canal de Telegram o en la lista talk-es. Un saludo y buen mapeo.

Jordi
Supaplex (2020-06-18 13:59:44+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
berjk (2020-06-29 05:20:34+00:00): >Besenwirtschaft Glonki Gilde e.V. (Blechtrommler) (7246616865, v1)
Ist da wirklich eine Besenwirtschaft im Altenheim?
user_1566574 (2020-05-29 19:00:56+00:00): Bonsoir,
Tu as changé https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/291415285/ de Pays-de-Clerval en Clerval.

Or, comme l'indique la page Wikipédia, INSEE, et pour l'avoir vu de mes propres yeux, il y a bien à l'entrée de la commune un panneau Pays-de-Clerval. Es-tu sûr de ce changement ?

Merci d'avance ! :)
vincent_95 (2020-05-29 19:34:36+00:00): Bonsoir Antonin,
le sujet commence à dater dans ma mémoire, je ne voudrais pas te raconter n'importe quoi. Sur le moment, il me semble être allé sur le site de la commune et y avoir vu une évocation de "Clerval", comme c'est encore le cas ce soir sur http://www.clerval.fr/pages/clerval/l-histoire/ par exemple. J'ai pensé à une confusion entre nom du village et nom de la commune, trouvant étonnant que le village même change de nom. Qu'une commune (entité administrative) change de nom est quant à lui courant.
Donc j'ai fait cette modif de bonne foi et avec quelques éléments, maigres j'avoue. Si l'usage local, contrairement à la page que je cite, est de parler du _village_ en tant que "Pays de Clerval", alors il n'y a pas de débat, je me suis trompé et il faut rétablir, ce qui a déjà été fait d'ailleurs.

Merci pour ton signalement,
vincent
user_1566574 (2020-05-29 20:03:29+00:00): Oui c'est assez confus ce site...
J'ai d'abord vu le marqueur Osmose en 2019 qui m'indiquait ce changement, donc en faisant quelques recherches pour être sûr, j'ai fait la mise à jour.

Le panneau communal a clairement changé de Clerval en Pays de Clerval (sans les tirets).
Je vais rétablir le vrai nom (avec tirets).

Clerval ayant fusionné avec Santoche pour former Pays-de-Clerval, il faudra peut-être effectuer des changements ?
(Ex : Supprimer place=village de Santoche, replacer celui de P-d-C, etc.)

Merci de ton retour rapide ! :)
ndm (2020-02-27 18:00:08+00:00): It improves motor_vehicle routing but degrades cycle routing -- I think you should have added a cycleway.
srinatpa (2020-03-02 05:23:33+00:00): Hi ndm,

Thanks for taking the time to review my edit. We are still working on the addition of paths data in OSM with valid resources. Please find the changeset for suggested modifications(81663115). Please let me know in case any further edits required.

Thanks & Regards,
Srinatpa
Kovoschiz (2020-02-27 11:28:10+00:00): "pedestrian area" (`highway=pedestrian`, `area=yes`) actually means a "pedestrian road" area, which is a road area vehicles can physically travel on (not necessarily legally, but think about emergency and service vehicles). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776675366/ would be `highway=footway` + `area=yes` instead, and you can add `crossing:island=yes`.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81533160
Kovoschiz (2020-02-27 11:28:32+00:00): Also `traffic_calming=island`.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81533160
Kovoschiz (2020-02-27 11:29:40+00:00): Also in HK, "unmarked crossing" should be `crossing=uncontrolled`. (don't mind iD editor app's warning)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81533160
user_5359 (2020-02-27 15:29:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
leofranz (2020-02-27 16:05:34+00:00): Hallo Michael_Link, bei der Adresse Moosau 5 ist dir das gleiche passiert wie bei der Feuerwehr: die Adresse gibt es schon, sie hängt auf dem Gebäude. (bei dem du die 3 Stockwerke eingetragen hast)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81534130
leofranz (2020-02-27 15:45:47+00:00): Hallo Michael_Link, 
noch ein Hinweis: Schranken werden nicht als Linie eingezeichnet sondern als Punkt auf einem highway. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81534348
leofranz (2020-02-27 15:40:27+00:00): Hallo Michael_Link und herzlich Willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Ich glaube bei diesem Changeset ist etwas schliefgelaufen. 
1. Die Feuerwehr Völs die du eingezeichnet hast, existiert ja schon als Gebäude, ein zusätzlicher Knoten ist da nicht notwendig.
2. Du hast die Adresse "Schießstandweg 4" verschoben vom ursprünglichen Platz auf den Parkplatz neben der Feuerwehr. War das ein Versehen?
lg leofranz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81534506
andrewwiseman (2020-08-07 19:54:59+00:00): Thanks for mapping! Please only add the "Name" field if you know the name of the feature. In this case it looks like you added hashtags as the name, which are added when you hit "save"
leofranz (2020-02-27 16:10:48+00:00): Hallo Michael_Link, auch bei der Kirchgasse 6 hängt die Adresse schon am Gebäude. lg leofranz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81535043
abakus_uploader (2020-02-27 23:30:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
freeExec (2020-02-27 13:03:59+00:00): Не должно быть никаких МАПП в имени
Zverik (2020-02-27 13:57:09+00:00): Я понимаю твою точку зрения. Эти префиксы выглядят странно. Но мы это уже обсуждали, и решили, что так ок. На всех знаках (которые я видел на западе страны) префиксы присутствуют. В официальных документах тоже.
Zverik (2020-02-27 13:57:35+00:00): (ну и это комментарий не к этому ченджсету, потому что он меняет название только у одного объекта — с МАПП на ДАПП).
freeExec (2020-02-28 06:37:54+00:00): Как раз на сайте у них название отдельно от типа, который представлен в виде значков.
kartler175 (2020-02-28 08:21:55+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.85268&lat=47.58764&zoom=16&opacity=1.00 liegt eindeutig innerhalb
user_5359 (2020-02-29 08:09:41+00:00): Hallo! Habe bei bicycle noch den Postfix conditional ergänzt. Aber leider passt die Zeitangaben in deiner Notiz zu keiner Angabe  über Lieferverkehr.
derkar (2020-03-01 14:13:35+00:00): Fahrrad und Lieferverker von 19-11 Uhr frei. Kann leider kein Bild senden.
mavl (2020-03-01 16:14:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81647490 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3530].
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:08:19+00:00): Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to Customers. This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
naaitha (2021-02-15 10:57:04+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under changeset #99302667. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
naaitha.
mavl (2020-03-01 16:13:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81647490 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3530].
abakus_uploader (2020-02-27 23:30:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2020-03-01 16:13:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81647490 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3530].
mueschel (2020-02-29 10:35:35+00:00): Hi,
what does this node represent?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7246957685
Please check the wiki for proper tagging of gas stations:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=fuel

Thanks!
HolgerJeromin (2020-10-15 10:05:01+00:00): I deleted the node.
Linkid (2020-02-27 08:18:52+00:00): C'est en fait la ligne 5
muzirian (2020-02-27 15:59:21+00:00): shape looks too big for a house, please check
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81538422
BCNorwich (2020-02-27 09:24:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
For the roads that are now open for public use the construction=residential tag should be removed.

Please note that if an existing way needs amending then it's best to amend/adjust/correct the existing way. Then the ways history is kept, removing and redrawing losses the previous history.

The Esri and Maxar imagery is more up to date than the Bing imagery, (that you've used), so the roads can be better aligned.

Regards Bernard.
Kovoschiz (2021-01-14 14:03:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776702788/ is not a truthful representation since there are no psychically separated slip lanes. The turning restriction is also unnecessarily set up, with legal restriction already tagged on the road.
Supaplex (2020-03-14 14:07:06+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Happy Mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81538793
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:08:26+00:00): Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to Customers. This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
naaitha (2021-02-15 10:53:38+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under changeset #99302379. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
naaitha.
aceman444 (2020-10-03 09:54:16+00:00): Zdravim. "unclassified" nie je najnizsia kategoria, je medzi "residential" a "tertiary" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified). Takze cele Vase zdovodnenie a zmeny su nespravne (cestu ste zdegradovali). Inak skuste prestat preklasifikovavat objekty na Slovensku kym pre to nemate spravny "cit" (napriek tomu sa tvarite, ze je nieco "naprosto zrejme"). Uz v minulosti ste porobili par pochybnych zmien. Ani nereagujete na ziadne pripomienky, co je v OSM povinne.
mavl (2020-03-01 16:13:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81647490 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3530].
dirtyidol (2020-03-03 13:45:29+00:00): Hi, 운영자. Please don't outline building roofs in such way. Every building=roof object you drawn is interpreted as a separate building placed above the other well-mapped building. Read this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Droof
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81540155
olo81 (2020-12-03 22:56:39+00:00): Błędy w oznaczaniu przejazdów przez tory
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2028163642#map=19/50.32551/19.13703

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:railway=level%20crossing?uselang=pl

a ma być:
railway=railway_crossing
prawdopodobnie jest tego dużo więcej
C2oc4 (2020-12-04 06:54:53+00:00): tak jak poprawione jest teraz ?
olo81 (2020-12-04 16:47:07+00:00): Teraz jeszcze sprawdziłem, przecięcia torów tramwajowych z drogami się nie oznacza. Aż się zakręciłem wcześniej :D 
Pociągnę te edycje overpassem, będzie szybciej wywalić te tagi.
olo81 (2020-12-04 17:02:50+00:00): już wywalone
C2oc4 (2020-12-04 19:04:39+00:00): oki dzięki
mavl (2020-03-01 16:13:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81647490 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3530].
olo81 (2020-12-03 23:03:27+00:00): skąd takie tagowanie? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2028163631

crossing=marked

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:crossing?uselang=pl
C2oc4 (2020-12-04 06:56:43+00:00): poprawie w całym powiecie wg możliwości
olo81 (2020-12-04 17:43:24+00:00): sprawdziłem jednak jest ok, od 2018r. ID sugeruje żeby tak tagować, nie musisz tego ruszać :) 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dmarked

Przepraszam za zamieszanie
mavl (2020-03-01 16:13:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81647490 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3530].
Sanniu (2020-03-01 13:48:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776712612 : Please don't add features under construction as completed. Also it's na ta separate road, but a one lane on existing road
muzirian (2020-02-27 15:58:18+00:00): its very unlikely for a path to have the name feroke municipality, please check
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81540787
aweech (2020-02-27 16:23:01+00:00): Hi,
Please don't delete Class VI roads! I went ahead and fixed your mistake.
utkap (2020-02-28 08:20:03+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for restoring the edit. Apologies for the deletion. While editing, I've noticed that the Bing street side imagery didn't provide any confirmation on the existence of the road at the node () and the aerial imagery also appeared to be covered with vegetation with no clue of the path/road through that area. Due to which, I had made the modification. 
Thanks again for fixing it. Looking forward to learning from you.
Regards,
utkap.