piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carnildo (2020-01-28 07:51:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM, and thanks for adding businesses to the map!

Something to keep in mind when you're editing: when you add a tag to something, the editing software sometimes automatically applies additional related tags.  For example, when you added the "Storage rental" tag to Skyview Storage, the "building" tag also got added, making it look like the entire area is a single building.  You can remove these extra tags by clicking on the "trash can" icon next to them.
will_p (2020-01-27 09:04:45+00:00): These changes appear to be incorrect. You have changed shop=window to craft=window_construction. The former is a shop where windows are sold, while the latter is a workshop where windows are made. They imply different things. Have you actually verified the original tagging was incorrect? I tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579720233 myself and I certainly intended it to be a showroom where windows are sold.

I know shop=window is depreciated, but that is not an excuse to change it to another tagged with a different meaning. The more accepted tag is shop=glaziery.
schoka (2020-02-01 17:14:58+00:00): Hallo Klaus,
darf ich fragen, warum du bei Solarfeldern landuse=industrial entfernt hast? Ist doch eigentlich nicht falsch - oder?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-06 09:43:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10631840 no_straight_on was accidentally added to Cynthiana Road disallowing through traffic.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-06 09:46:14+00:00): My own curiosity:
If Amazon uses OSM for navigation how was this not found? 
Was it maybe reported but mappers not knowing how to triage the issue?
Glassman (2020-01-27 21:56:04+00:00): bicycle=not recommended should be set to no. If the cyclist wants to ride it, then it's up to them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80117353
DFWMapLoader (2020-01-27 04:33:46+00:00): bloomfield homes, Paloma creek website lists all the names of the roads. google maps, you can see the roads in satilite, but not in the map itself.
Please help add these roads.
kartonage (2020-01-29 04:36:39+00:00): Hej David Metcalfe,

in this changeset you created a building on top of multiple other buildings while also deleting the way for the old amenity and creating a new way for it instead of just improving the existing way and not duplicating the social facility amenity, which was already tagged on the building. 

Try to keep the history of objects and and also look out for already existing features please. The building tag is also almost never appropriate on the area surrounding the facility. Thanks.

Best regards
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:32:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mvviveka (2020-01-27 05:23:11+00:00): Hi all ,
Updating the comment for the changeset # 80119109, Added Driveway connecting to  Secondary Road: Red Hill Road.
Regards,
mvviveka.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
jtracey (2020-01-27 14:45:11+00:00): Thanks for the edit. :)
For future reference, these should just be tagged as building=house. Residential areas would cover basically the entire block (it's roughly akin to zoning). Side tip, if you press "q" with a building selected, it will turn the corners into right angles, which can make things look a little cleaner. I went ahead and did that for these.
TheSwavu (2020-09-12 07:07:34+00:00): Hi,
LGA area in Tasmania only go to the low water mark, not out to the 3 nm limit. Also only Macquarie Island is in the Huon Council, not the other islands in the group.

Thanks.
RoundCircle (2020-09-26 07:00:39+00:00): This was improvisational, because PSMA did not include data for Macquarie Island.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Carnildo (2020-01-28 08:04:54+00:00): The usual way to tag this sort of business is as a "Cafe" with a cuisine of "coffee shop".
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:31:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Harel M (2020-01-27 06:59:02+00:00): תודה רבה על התרומה לפרוייקט!
מומלץ לתת שמות יותר משמעותיים: לדוגמא תצפית על מפל חלמיש, או מפל חלמיש, או המפל הגדול. אם זה מפל, עדיף לסמן אותו כמפל ולא כתצפית.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Glassman (2020-01-27 21:58:15+00:00): surface should be something like ground or dirt. There is a list on the wiki. BTW - we don't have spaces in typical tag values. The exceptions are name and description (and maybe some others that aren't coming to mind right off)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80122058
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Glassman (2020-01-27 21:59:04+00:00): That building is much bigger than what shows in the image. Can you adjust the outline to match the image?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80122910
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
aceman444 (2020-04-18 19:05:28+00:00): Zdravim, co ste chceli vyjadrit tymi service=drive-through na niektorych service cestach v tom botanickom areali na severovychod od Kralovianok?
Vobec mi to nepripomina cestu na prejazd obchodom a zakupenie tovaru z auta (ako McDonalds drive-in). Ked uz, tak skor service=alley.

A tiez service=driveway na highway=track  nema nejaky vyznam.

Prosim pozrite to.
synalik (2020-04-20 11:52:27+00:00): Opravené
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:30:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:58:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
AkuAnakTimur (2020-03-29 14:46:16+00:00): Hi, please read this changeset discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72538245
AkuAnakTimur (2020-03-29 14:47:56+00:00): Here's what it actually looks like beyond https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6639464288

https://cf.mastohost.com/v1/AUTH_91eb37814936490c95da7b85993cc2ff/enosmtown/media_attachments/files/000/048/083/original/d5c5da797dc74e35.jpg
Fauzan IRM-ED (2020-03-30 06:29:26+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur, Thank you for your correction.
how about this road from node 6639464234
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6639464234) until node 6639464246 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6639464246)
being changed to an residential road and the extended road until node 6639464288 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6639464288) being changed to an agricultural track road and deleted "name=Jalan Sekolah" in the both of them?
AkuAnakTimur (2020-03-30 09:15:08+00:00): Hi, thanks for your reply.
You may leave the former as a highway=residential, but please remove name=* tags from those two highways.
Fauzan IRM-ED (2020-03-31 05:05:47+00:00): Hi, I've changed it based on your suggestion..Thanks for the correction.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:57:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Jordi MF (2020-02-14 22:51:25+00:00): Hola,

He vist que has modificat el nom d'alguns carrers i has eliminat la preposició i l'article que hi ha entre el nom genèrica de la via i el nom específic. Tingues en ocmpte que en valencià el més correcte, recomanat per l'AVL és que s'hafegisca la perposició de entre els dos noms. M'imagine que ho hauràs fet perquè en la placa no apareix així. El criteri que seguim en OSM és el de mantindre la perposició i l'article encara que en la placa no estiga. Ho tractem d'igual manera que si hi haguera una falta ortogràfica en la placa. En OSM escriuríem correctament el nom (per exemple, afegint el accents). Si al buscador busques "Carrer País Valencià" i en la base de dades està com a "Carrer del País Valencià", el trobarà; però a la inversa, no (és un problema de nominatim).

Per tant, et recomane que no modifiques aquests noms perquè són completament correcte en OSM. Moltes gràcies,

Jordi
opendcc (2020-01-29 20:37:36+00:00): Der Kreisel an der B301 ist jetzt aber doch etwas derangiert ...
zorae (2020-01-29 21:45:35+00:00): Bitte erkläre mir genauer, wo das Problem liegt.
opendcc (2020-01-30 06:55:36+00:00): Hallo,

der Kreisel B301 / Karwendelring war ziemlich 'verhakelt', mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80278159 habe ich das wieder korrigiert.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:56:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-27 18:17:26+00:00): Hallo aMa-MiH, bei Kreuzungsgeometrien bitte immer alle Abbiegewinkel betrachten, dass keiner zu steil wird. Wo eine Straße oder Teilstraße so auf eine andere trifft, dass man rechts und links abbiegen kann, sollte das möglichst rechtwinklig gemappt werden, damit keiner der zwei Winkel zu scharf wird. 

Dieser Anschluss (Obernburger Str. an B 469) wurde laut https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77803369 kürzlich umgebaut, dort kann man nicht mehr links abbiegen.
aMa-MiH (2020-01-29 13:13:13+00:00): Hallo kreuzschnabel.
Danke für Rückmeldung. 

Vorab zum raschen grafischen Anschauen der Geometrieänderungen dieses CSes:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=80127335

Ging es Dir um meine Änderung bzgl. der Kreuzungsgeometrie (1), oder um den Punkt, dass ich einen älteren Stand von den Strassenbildern abgemalt habe (2).?
Oder im Zusammenhang weil wegen (2) dann nach aktuellen Stand (1) nicht mehr stimmig ist?

Bzgl. (2) hatte ich wohl nicht genügend recherchiert, das hätte ich wohl an der Wegstückchronik von diesem Weg (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/23133969) an V#9-Kommentar ("Laudenbach, Einmündung B469 Nord: sowohl von B469 als auch von Laudenbach kommend nur noch rechts abbiegen erlaubt" ) ablesen können.
Du wohl auch, und es wäre daher zur zusätzlichen Absicherung nicht nötig gewesen, beim Bearbeiter 'Peilscheibe' nachzufragen, der zwischenzeitlich mal dran war. 

Danke für die umgehende nachträgliche Änderung. Nebenbei, irgendwie ist Dir da wohl auch ein kleineres Missgeschick passiert, Du hast nun den eher wertvolleren Weg (den mit der längeren Geschichte: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/23133969) gelöscht...:
 
Es wäre schön (/hilfreich), wenn der recht übersichtliche PeWu-(History)-Ansichtdienst auch irgendwie auf osm.org eingebunden wäre. (Bei den beiden Haupteditoren iD und JOSM ist er mittlerweile integriert) ...

Wünsche eine gute Zeit!
aMa-MiH (2020-01-29 13:23:42+00:00): PS: Bin gerade am Überlegen, ob man analog zu abgerissenen Gebäuden (bei denen man razed:, :removed oder demolished:) an den Umrissen ranmacht, solange sie noch auf den Luft-/Strassenbildern zu sehen sind, dies auch bei abgebauten Strassen(-segmenten) umsetzen könnte. Laut taginfo gibt es sogar erste Einheiten dazu, siehe https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=razed%3Ahighway / https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=removed%3Ahighway / https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=demolished%3Ahighway )
aMa-MiH (2020-01-29 13:32:07+00:00): PS zu PS: Ach sehe gerade, Du hast die Lifecycle-Idee sehr schön über eine andere Variante durch hinzufügen dieses (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7164573465) Note-Node gelöst :-)
Ist mir zunächst nicht aufgefallen, weil die bbox Deines CSes bis nach Wiesbaden reicht...
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-29 14:24:56+00:00): Ich fand’s vor allem witzig, dass ich 12 Stunden vorher auch in der Versuchung stand, die scheinbar unvollständig gemappte Kreuzung nach Luftbild zu ergänzen. Deshalb hab ich bei user:Peilscheibe nachgefragt, der zuletzt dran war, wie der aktuelle Stand ist. Als ich am nächsten Tag die bearbeitete Kreuzung sah, dachte ich zuerst, ich hätte meine Absicht tatsächlich hochgeladen, ohne die Antwort von Peilscheibe abzuwarten :D :D
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-29 14:28:22+00:00): Meine erste Anmerkung bezog sich rein auf die Geometrie deines Mappings. Du hast den südlichsten Ast (den zur Bundesstraße hinführenden) dort so auftreffen lassen, dass Linksabbieger einen sanften und Rechtsabbieger einen steilen Winkel sahen. Solche Verbindungen mache ich immer möglichst rechtwinklig, siehe z.B. die nächste südlich. Im Forum wurde vor einiger Zeit ein Fall diskutiert, wo ein Navi im LKW-Modus lieber Umwege nahm als eine 120°-Abbiegung zu fahren.
aMa-MiH (2020-01-29 14:48:52+00:00): "... abzuwarten :D :D"
hehe

"... bezog sich rein auf die Geometrie deines Mappings."

Achso, jetzt verstehe ich was Du meinst. Also sicherlich so ähnlich in der Form, wie ich es jetzt hier mal bspw. in einer Vorschau gemalt habe: habe:https://ibb.co/8Btf7TP
?
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-29 15:01:40+00:00): Genau :)
aMa-MiH (2020-01-29 15:08:31+00:00): :-)
Ok danke für, Info'.
Diesbzgl. schaue ich schon oft hin, aber manchmal denkt man sich (auf die Schnelle) nicht tief genug in solche Fälle hinrein...

Was machen wir nun mit dem "wertvollen" altem Wegstück: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/23133969 ?
Wiederbeleben/Wiedereinblenden?
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-29 15:14:12+00:00): Ist wiederbelebt.
aMa-MiH (2020-01-29 15:19:06+00:00): Merci vielmals!
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
abakus_uploader (2020-01-27 23:31:01+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
user_5359 (2020-01-27 14:58:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between school levels and building:levels. K-5 isn't a correct value for building:levels.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
abakus_uploader (2020-01-27 23:31:00+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:55:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:54:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:54:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:54:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:54:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-01-31 17:54:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
apm-wa (2020-02-24 12:33:27+00:00): Я изменил тэг на landuse=construction.  Спасибо, что отметили место сноса жилых домов и нового строительства!
user_5359 (2020-01-27 14:21:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-01-27 09:42:04+00:00): Why did this one have a large bounding box?
popnlock (2020-01-27 21:50:31+00:00): Thank you TagaSanPedroAko for pointing out this overlook. I should have split these two edits into separate changesets. Have a good new year!
user_5359 (2020-01-27 14:39:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
apm-wa (2020-02-24 12:53:06+00:00): Спасибо, что нашли новое место этого посольства!
M!dgard (2020-02-01 12:11:05+00:00): U hebt een typfout gemaakt, wilt u die verbeteren?
Jakka (2020-02-01 12:35:54+00:00): nooit twijfelen typ fout mag je altijd rechtzetten. done
kartler175 (2020-01-28 23:16:37+00:00): Bitte hier nichts mehr ändern, bis der Datensatz revertiert wurde: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.52774&lat=51.51247&zoom=15&opacity=1.00
kartler175 (2020-01-29 09:01:25+00:00): Ortumriss ist wieder hergestellt
Ropino (2020-01-29 17:46:21+00:00): Sorry für meinen Fehler und Danke für den Revert.
GeoMechain (2020-10-14 07:57:48+00:00): Hi Elijah Filip,

Why did you remove the landuse=residential tag ? It seems to be appropriate in this case. While the tag area=yes is very vague and not usable. Moreover the description is not understandable.

Moreover this contribution seems to be an import from an external base (which would explain the difficult understanding of the latter). Be aware that there is a special procedure for importing data: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import

If you have more questions you can contact the community: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels.

GeoMechain