piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
Andrea Musuruane (2019-08-08 09:43:59+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Ho qualche dubbio sul fatto che il seguente edificio sia un bagno pubblico (ovvero un luogo dove si fa il bagno). Non è che sono dei servizi igenici (amenity=toilets)?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711887245

Ciao,

Andrea
simoz123osm (2019-08-08 09:47:25+00:00): Sì, esatto. Sono servizi igienici. Scusami
Andrea Musuruane (2019-08-08 10:02:17+00:00): Nessun problema. Sbagliando si impara :-) Ciao, Andrea
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
glglgl (2019-08-09 09:07:27+00:00): Alas, this changeset left the Walkertown admin relation in an uncleaned state. The several parts of the US 158 were used as boundary sections as well. Would you mind repairing it?
boopington (2019-08-10 15:24:25+00:00): Oopsy daisy, sure.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse (2019-08-11 20:41:00+00:00): NCN7 doesn't look quite right currently - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11017#map=15/55.7165/-4.6915 .  Presumably there's some sort of diversion here because of roadworks mentioned at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693940032 ?
AlwynWellington (2019-08-12 07:00:54+00:00): "By their interests you will know them" with apologies to Saint Matthew.

I walked this rute in November 2017 when the workd were were well underway but not then complete.

I deliberately did not (knowingly) change anything to do with NCR 7.  You will need to discuss with the promoters of that cycle route as to what their preferences are.

I think you my have made the point that the international usage of path, coupled with the "cycle layer" in the iD editor for those wanting to see cycleways, is a better way to do things

With kind regards,  Alan
SomeoneElse (2019-08-12 07:50:41+00:00): Thanks - I mentioned it in #osm-gb (there are usually a couple of cyclists in there).  The final route will probably need a resurvey when the works are complete.
Richard (2019-08-12 09:19:47+00:00): I've done a first pass.

@AlwynWellington this has nothing to do with path tagging at all, please stop trolling.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
marc__marc (2019-08-19 14:00:39+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369156862
can you fix the firehydrant issue ?
thanks
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
mavl (2019-08-08 16:14:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты. Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника вы добавляете адреса?
mavl (2019-09-06 16:04:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:05:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:05:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:05:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:05:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
Warin61 (2019-08-10 04:08:14+00:00): Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2019-09-06 16:06:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:06:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:06:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:06:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:07:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
mavl (2019-09-06 16:07:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74183894
viloan (2019-08-08 02:00:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-08-08 04:30:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useless information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
Supaplex (2019-08-08 03:02:22+00:00): Why do you remove the local use Chinese name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73133441
Vengadormascado (2019-08-08 03:07:39+00:00): Hello, sorry I'm new on OSM. I don't remove it but move it to the multilingual feature "中文“ in order to specify the language.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73133441
Supaplex (2019-08-08 07:39:12+00:00): Please keep in mind that name=xxx is for local name, in the case in Taiwan is filling in Traditional Chinese Characteristic.  It is still welcomed to add different language name in the name:xx format.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73133441
Vengadormascado (2019-08-08 07:55:30+00:00): Ok, my bad, I will correct it. Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73133441
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-08 04:17:17+00:00): Apologies for the atrocious grammar on this comment -.-.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse (2020-05-23 11:38:35+00:00): Hello yunita sari,
I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 10 months ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711911335 was added with a "source=Google" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.
If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
mueschel (2019-08-10 10:03:41+00:00): Hi,
you added several hundred objects with tags that don't look like they should be in the OSM database like these:

CREASRC=OMM-DRD-CDD Paung TS mapping session
EDITCOM20190808=TZ
EDITCOM20190207=TZ

Could you please have a look and fix this?

thanks
Jan
user_5359 (2019-08-08 13:59:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
PT-53 (2019-12-27 09:16:35+00:00): Hallo turbojoe,
nach Deinen Bearbeitungen in Pflach werden im OSM-Inspector mehrere Hinweise "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.71478&lat=47.51864&zoom=17&opacity=0.17&overlays=ways_without_tags
Das sollen wohl alles Gebäude sein. Ergänzt Du die fehlenden Merkmale noch?
Bitte beachte dabei, daß Gebäude eine geschlossene Linie (Fläche) sein sollten.
Grüße
turbojoe (2019-12-28 15:38:39+00:00): Servus. Danke, war wohl ein Fehler. Die Tags sind an einem Node, statt an der  Linie gehangen. Korrigiert.
Dass Gebäudeteile vollständige Flächen sein müssen, sehe ich nicht so, und habe dies nicht ergänzt.
PT-53 (2019-12-29 09:04:46+00:00): Hallo turbojoe, 
wie Du im Wiki - DE:Key:building
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building
auf der rechten Seite sehen kannst, sollte der Schlüssel nur für Knoten oder geschlossene Linien (Flächen) und nicht für offene Linien verwendet werden.
Gebäude ohne geschlossene Linie werden auch nicht als Gebäude dargestellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711927843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135679685
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-30 09:37:40+00:00): Hallo turbojoe, 
OSMOSE moniert die beide Gebäude ohne geschlossene Linie ebenfalls:
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=18&lat=47.518841&lon=10.714942&item=1040%2C1170%2C1220%2C1221%2C1230%2C1240%2C1250%2C1260%2C1270%2C1280&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
Grüße
fkv (2020-04-22 14:57:56+00:00): Da du für Furth einen place-Node angelegt hast, kannst du den Namen vom Landuse entfernen? Und bei der Gelegenheit herausfinden, was name=Stein am nordöstlich angrenzenden landuse zu bedeuten hat?
Luzandro (2020-04-22 16:42:36+00:00): Entspricht diesem Place-Node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2674937075

Kommt hier öfter vor, dass die residential-Flächen statt oder zusätzlich zum Place-Node benannt sind
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:37:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-08 05:59:11+00:00): Greece: added destination=Ναύπακτος;Αντίρριο;added destination:ref=ΕΟ48
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-08 06:38:21+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM.
Thanks for your recent contributions to the map.
Do you know if this park is for residents of the apartments only (i.e. people can't walk in off the street)?
SpazTheCat26 (2019-08-08 13:39:02+00:00): Yes it is for the apartment residents; however, anyone can use it while the gates are open as long as they aren’t disruptive. It’s a small playground with a Ramada.
tux67 (2019-08-12 12:17:56+00:00): Hallo Freeeddy,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Welche Quelle hattest du für die Hydrantendaten?
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73136495
clacks (2019-08-12 13:31:11+00:00): Hallo tux67,

Ich arbeite beim zuständigen Wasserversorger und bin in der Feuerwehr. 

Gruß
tux67 (2019-08-12 15:03:13+00:00): Prima, ich nehme an dein Arbeitgeber ist mit der Nutzung der Daten im Rahmen der OSM Lizenz einverstanden? 
Es gab da in der Vergangenheit scheinbar schom Missverständnisse in anderen Gegenden.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62898
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73136495
clacks (2019-08-12 17:23:11+00:00): Hallo nochmal ;)
ich glaube, ich habe mich falsch ausgedrückt. Ich habe tatsächlich keine Daten vom Arbeitgeber genutzt. Ich kenne nur die Notwendigkeit und das Nutzen vllt. besser, da ich dort arbeite. 
Wir haben uns tatsächlich das Fahrrad geschnappt und einen Stadtplan und sind mal durch die Straßen gezogen. Aus diesem Grund sind auch nicht überall alle Daten vorhanden. 

Oder wäre das auch schon falsch? Das könnte ja quasi jeder machen, der Lust hat, da die Schilder ja frei auf der Straße stehen?

Gruß
tux67 (2019-08-12 18:43:01+00:00): Selber gesammelt ist ok. Es sollte nur beim hochladen des Änderungssatzes schon eine Nennung der Quelle erfolgen. Bei anderen Editoren geht das im Upload Dialog .. Bei OsmHydrant weiss ich's nicht auswendig.
Gruß tux67
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-08 05:58:44+00:00): Greece: added destination=Λάρισα
aharvey (2019-08-08 10:30:15+00:00): Could you note your source for the geometry? It helps others who come along later using updated aerial imagery decide which is more accurate.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
user_5359 (2019-08-08 13:51:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useless information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
highflyer74 (2019-08-09 13:39:02+00:00): Again, here https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Lrn you can see incomplete tags on railway stations (public_tra=*) and non-OSM data on objects.

If an object is not used anymore (like some of the train stations) they should be tagged in accordance with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. This would make the description=* obsolete and is machine readable.

If you need any help, just let me know!
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
eggie (2019-08-08 06:58:47+00:00): Dag boetersep,
Altijd oke als je access=no weghaalt. 
Dat routeerde niet meer.
Editor iD nodigt kennelijk uit om daarmee te beginnen. We zien het heel vaak. 
foot=yes is al default, maar kan verder geen kwaad. 
Soms wordt bicycle-yes weggehaald omdat dat ook default is en blijft helaas access=no staan. Weg routering. ...Volgens mij aan e arcering te zien staat het noordelijke stukje naar de brug ook nog op access=no
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-08 07:01:46+00:00): Het noordelijke stukje naar de brug moet ook nog worden ontdaan van access=no.. anders routeert het nog niet.
eggie (2019-08-08 07:11:54+00:00): access=no heb ik ondertussen verwijderd van dat vervolgstukje. In de openfietsmap routeerde het overigens wel Kennelijk doet access=no daar niets of het wordt overruled omdat het een fietsroute is?
Gr Eggie
lamax (2019-08-09 14:18:24+00:00): Что это? Это народное наимевание какого-то природного урочища/объекта или капище сектантов-неоязычников?
AntonSmr (2019-08-12 10:44:44+00:00): Это капище сектантов, неоязычников и фотографов, любителей этники. Некоторые мои знакомые давно ищут это место. Его неоднократно сжигали и восстанавливали.
chnav (2019-12-05 12:38:19+00:00): Пожалуйста не удаляйте данные, а исправляйте. Вот вы удалили старые "руины" на Парковой 2 и 4, нарисовали новый дом и обозначили Восточная-2, что неверно. Это не может быть ул. Восточная. Если бы не удалили контур старого барака то знали бы об этом. 

Всё восстановлено обратно.
Warin61 (2023-09-25 02:14:51+00:00):  number of these addresses do not match the road names in OSM as they have the suffix "East" added. The DCS base map also does  not show these "East" suffixes ... 

Comment?
nevw (2023-09-26 23:45:18+00:00): Hi, I can fix these if you like.
nevw (2023-09-26 23:52:28+00:00): I have gone ahead and corrected these
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141794983
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141794983
Warin61 (2023-09-27 08:20:59+00:00): I too can 'fix' them. However there are a number address issues. I'm thinking about some resolution. I have raised one issue on the tagging list and I think a solution would also suit some of these address issues too.
nevw (2023-09-27 19:13:03+00:00): Yes, there is a need for new addr or postal tagging for community groups like gated communities but I expect this changeset was some sort of cut and paste error.
Warin61 (2023-09-28 08:28:33+00:00): It could be an error on the LPI/DCS data base ... 
Mowbray Road West for example in OSM is  Mowbray Road I have added the Mowbray Road West as an alternative and changed the relevant addresses in OSM to match and used addr_postal:street for the Mowbray Road West ...
daviewales (2023-09-28 11:10:08+00:00): Good catch! This was from this import project:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Australia_NSW_Property_and_Address_Import

Most information and the full history of uploaded and reviewed address files is in the GitLab repository:

https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import

My best guess as to what happened here is that the script fetched points within a bounding box which included the suburb. It was then supposed to remove points which were not from the suburb in question. In this case, it would have removed points which are not from Killara. However, I'm guessing there was (or is) a bug which prevented it from removing points from East Killara. (These should have been removed and added in a separate changeset).

The second issue is that the LPI property API returns the address as a single field '10 Example Street Suburb'. To split this into the format required for OSM, the script removes the right-hand side of the address matching the suburb we are supposed to be uploading. In this case, it removes 'Killara' from the right-hand side of the address. However, because it failed to exclude the 'East Killara' addresses earlier, it just removes 'Killara' from the end, and leaves '10 Example Street East' as the address.

Sorry for not catching this in review.
Warin61 (2023-09-29 10:27:43+00:00): "There is always one more bug" 

The good thing is that with the greater amount of data that cross references to other data there is more chance that any bugs will be found and sorted.
abakus_uploader (2019-08-08 22:30:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!