piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gbragaalves (2021-10-30 19:47:17+00:00): Tudo certinho, obrigado pela presteza.

Temos grupos no Telegram e no Discord para tirar dúvidas de pessoas que estão começando a mapear agora. Não hesite em entrar em contato caso precise de alguma coisa.
Haris IRM-ED (2023-03-17 04:33:50+00:00): Hi, VIOLALIST.
Thank you for your mapping contribution.

While doing validation about MultiPolygon relation, i find that school buildings that belong to Multiploygon relation with id of 13373083 is mapped by sharing each other building nodes, and unfortunately it cause error "multipolygon outer way shares segment with other ring" 

Due to my lack of local knowledge on this area, please allow me to ask some question :
1. Is the School building a single building or consists of several separated buildings?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/13373083

2. Do you mind if i fix this issue by merge the separated buildings into one building as the outer member of relation and the field inside of the building as the inner member of relation? or do you have any other suggestions?

Feel free to provide any suggestion, it will be really aprreciated :)

Thank You, and Happy Mapping !
Glassman (2021-10-27 17:59:02+00:00): #TIP: Building outlines should match the roof line, but pools unless they are in the actual building.
keithonearth (2022-01-17 23:13:28+00:00): I'm not familiar with the "one point, one name rule for bodies of seawater". Where can I read more about it?
DENelson83 (2022-01-17 23:51:34+00:00): It is a rule I use when naming bodies of seawater.  Any point on the sea is allowed to have a maximum of one name associated with it.
keithonearth (2022-01-19 15:45:38+00:00): Oh, it's just a personal rule you use for yourself, not a general OSM one? I think it should have more general acceptance to change the names of bodies of water like you have with this changeset.
keithonearth (2022-02-19 05:07:56+00:00): I've posted my question to  https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/83528/

Feel free to comment there, if you would like.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-19 13:29:57+00:00): (prompted to come here by the help question)
The relevant OSM wiki page is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element - essentially you wouldn't add 2 things in OSM for one thing in the real world.  However, that page doesn't say that a patch of water can't be part of 2 larger sea areas - the bits of harbour here obviously are bits of harbour, but they're also part of the larger fjord.
keithonearth (2022-02-22 07:45:16+00:00): I see that DENelson83 has made some more significant restructuring of the named parts of Burrard Inlet with the changeset:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13828327

This uses parent relations to create a complex structure, with no advantage. The fundamental issue with these changes is that there is no "one point, one name" rule. As has been pointed out in the help article and the above comment.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-05 05:41:32+00:00): نرجوا منكم إثبات اسم الشارع حيث أن المصادر المذكورة بالتغيير لا تحتوي على اسم الشارع، وفي حال عدم ذكره سيتم عكس التغييرات
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-05 05:44:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113008790
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-05 05:28:57+00:00): مهما تغير اسم المستخدم يمكننا متابعة أي تعديلات على الأماكن، لذا نرجوا منكم التوقف عن تغيير المسمى
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-05 05:43:15+00:00): تم عكس التغيير واستعادة هذا التخريب، ونرجوا منكم الإجابة على الاستفسار السابق في التغيير السابق:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111303585
VictorIE (2022-01-01 15:00:24+00:00): Hi! How come you marked the fire station as a hangar? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26481825/history 
Happy new year!
ivanbranco (2021-10-27 15:19:28+00:00): Hi Advait, 

OSM tags usually are all lowcase, with no spaces, so this are wrong:
Number of beds=430
Opening hours=24 hours

You can consult the Wiki to find the right tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:beds
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Can you fix it?
Erelen (2021-10-29 03:43:38+00:00): JFYI: вдоль Серебрякова из-за идущей сейчас реконструкции доступные для OSM спутниковые снимки уже не актуальны. Тепловая карта Стравы (куда входят треки за два года) - тоже.

Местами чуть вернул пешеходку в соответствие с актуальной реальностью.
MxxCon (2021-10-27 21:39:50+00:00): You added number of beds and phone number to a helipad... 🤦‍♂️
TeXnicer (2021-10-26 20:42:42+00:00): Still at construction. 
Revisitation recommended within 3 months.
Hans Thompson (2021-10-27 16:50:23+00:00): This is cool. Is there a website that has compiled all of these webcams to browse?
wvdp (2021-10-28 11:22:59+00:00): I am the maintainer of https://cartocams.com/ which is a map containing all webcams mapped on osm.
Joe HIrn (2021-10-26 21:10:56+00:00): Hello. I'd like to add our art gallery to OSM. No advertising, just want my car navigation to pick it up.
Lee Carré (2021-10-26 21:42:30+00:00): See http://www.osm.org/note/2725141 & comments on http://www.osm.org/changeset/107505644
G_P_J (2021-10-27 11:13:32+00:00): Cześć, Twój import wygenerował kilkanaście błędów w punktach adresowych (niezgodność nazwy ulicy w adresie z nazwą w OSM). http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy/#15/50.7051/22.4117
Dasz radę to poprawić?
Pozdrawiam,
Piotr
charl3s (2021-10-27 11:28:41+00:00): poprawię
charl3s (2021-10-27 11:29:35+00:00): Czy z v3 mrowki da się pobrać tylko te adresy, które mają błąd czy trzeba ręcznie szukać? Ewentualnie jakaś kwerenda do overpassa jest?
G_P_J (2021-10-27 12:06:14+00:00): Niestety ręcznie. Ja powiększam w mrówkach odpowiednio, aż pojawią się nazwy na żółto i pobieram strzałką na środku. Potem w JOSM wyszukuję po nazwie ulicy i ponownie szukam housenumber w wyświetlonych wynikach. Następnie zmieniam nazwę dla wszystkich adresów na zgodną z nazwą ulicy.
NieWnen (2021-10-27 12:44:41+00:00): Ja zwykle robię tak, że następnego dnia po imporcie wchodzę na osmose. Jest to dla mnie zdecydowanie wygodniejsze niż mrówki.

Te które dot. adresów zwykle wskakują na level=2, zarówno błędna nazwa ulicy, jak i brak ulicy w najbliższym obszarze.

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/charl3s?level=2
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
dieterdreist (2025-04-30 07:39:10+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you added this archaeological site as related to  ancient egypt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9203454613/
Frankly, I find it very improbable, can you please verify?
Thank you,
Martin
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
wille (2021-10-28 11:09:52+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113012995
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-26 04:36:31+00:00): You used some incline=up/down tags - do you remember what you wanted to express with it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996736159/history
KosJan (2022-05-14 19:16:18+00:00): Sklepu już nie ma
NieWnen (2022-05-14 19:21:48+00:00): Z kiedy ta informacja? Bo wydaje mi się, że jeszcze miesiąc temu był (ale może mi się wydawać) i czy jest teraz tam jakiś inny sklep?
KosJan (2022-05-14 19:45:56+00:00): Teraz jest tam pracownia cukiernicza. Od września ten sklep nie funkcjonuje
skorasaurus (2023-02-25 21:40:05+00:00): thank you for your changes to improve the map.
nevw (2022-09-20 04:31:09+00:00): Hi, I have given Brooyar State Forest 1 correct tagging and have added the following tags to the plantation areas you added...
landcover=trees
plantation=yes
and also a note=incomplete, many other plantation areas in vicinity, some harvested
nevw (2022-09-20 06:52:42+00:00): I have now mapped the remaining plantation tree cover
tlconrd (2021-10-26 23:54:07+00:00): source is from https://www.estransit.com/routes-schedule/community-routes/bishop-creek-shuttle/
tuttiton (2021-10-27 09:08:51+00:00): So apparently instead of fixing the damage you did, you decided to continue and just not mark your vandalism as such... a shame really
Lee Carré (2021-10-27 15:51:32+00:00): The ATM is still out of order (with the same sign taped over the display). I suspect that it will be for a while yet.

When (or if) it's restored to working order, then the tagging can be changed back.
Warin61 (2021-10-30 00:31:25+00:00): Hi,
Lets looks at the shorter of the 3 relations changed here.. 
Relation 8014084. 

Open the relation for editing, and then go to the first gap. Down relief (62 nodes). Right click and zoom to that way. Scroll down to the last way in the next group of ways - they have another break at the end. Select that last way by double clicking on it.. the red way that was selected will vanish and another way will go red .. but it is not on this screen. OK - that means this group of ways is not the group to change. 
Scroll down to the last way in the next group of ways - they have another break at the end. Select that last way by double clicking on it.. and there it is on the screen and it follows on from the past 62 nodes. 
This is the group that is needed after the 62 nodes .. but in the reverse order. 
Changing the order of this group of ways. 
Select the group. Click on the bottom of the group. Then 'shift click' on the top of the group. Then reverse the order - buttons on the left side .. at the top are the blue arrows - they will move the group up/down this order - so not those .. then the dust bin to delete the group .. so not that one, then the arrows .. you want the bottom one to change the order. 

Shit them up the order - use the blue arrow up button to move the group up ... as you move up the gap will remain up until it all falls in to order. 

Ok - good .. that bit is done. But there can be more so check for the next gap.. and there is another ... repeat the above .. but this time only one group needs to be reordered. 

Similar things will need to be done for the other relations. 

--------------------
You will note that longer relations are slower to do ... Sydney to Perth in particular.
MxxCon (2021-10-27 03:26:21+00:00): Hello.
Is this actually a separate road or just a sidewalk of Plaza Way road?👍
richie_engineer (2021-10-27 08:35:24+00:00): It's actually a separate street between Bennett and Harvey. It's gravel, and there is a set of trees between Adams and Plaza. Plaza has no sidewalk on that side.
Warin61 (2021-10-28 05:37:31+00:00): Hi,
Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.34425&lat=-38.03243&zoom=18

You should fix this.
user_13865352 (2021-10-27 08:55:07+00:00): Đường Võ Nguyên Giáp không phải là đường Quốc lộ 1A. Đây là đường tránh Thành phố Biên Hòa; xin không gán ref=QL.1A.
Thân ái!
MxxCon (2021-10-27 03:56:40+00:00): Hello.
There are a couple of things you should consider to improve your edit.
If you are mapping sidewalks as separate path from the road, don't forget to connect sidewalks to appropriate intersections with crosswalks. Otherwise you are creating 'routing islands' where navigation software wouldn't know how to get you out to the rest of the map; or it would give suboptimal navigation directions, such as if you are coming from Pennington St you'd be directed to go all the way to Camp St middle of the block and then loop back around.
Additionally, when mapping sidewalks as separate paths, please add `sidewalk:left/right/both=separate` tag to the associate road as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way This tells software that understands that tag there's sidewalk mapped and not just a nearby walking path.

Additionally, based on your username and url in the comment it appears that you represent an organization. As such please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing

And finally, please don't advertise in changeset comments. It's spammy.
Diacritic (2021-10-27 05:26:14+00:00): Hi timetotom,

Thanks for your contributions so far! :)

In this change set you’ve introduced some ways that represent turn lanes (for example 996755528).

While I appreciate this is an effort to add richer derail, this is contrary to accepted editing standards and conventions.

Ways should only be split when there is physical separation between them (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided%20highways ). Adding ways for turn lanes will confuse routing algorithms and make it impossible to use OSM data to get directions. Turn details, lane numbers and other features should instead be added to the main highway with Lanes:, Turn: and other tags.

I am aware there are a few other intersections in the immediate area that have been incorrectly modelled with the turn lane ways, so I can understand the confusion. However, the standard of keeping ways together until the carriageways split is overwhelmingly accepted across the community and the superfluous lanes will most likely be removed by subsequent editors.

I’m happy to discuss this in more detail; it took me a while to get the hang of intersection modelling but it’s very addictive when you get it right. :) although it’s not authoritative, Mapbox‘a guide really helped me out: https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/
timetotom (2021-10-27 06:15:33+00:00): Hi, thank you for the feedback I really appreciate it. Making a convoluted turn/intersection like this one as simple as possible is proving tricky. But that link did help with making it appear simpler. I'd be happy to discuss the more accepted way of modelling these types of intersections. If I make an update to what I hope is more correct, some feedback would be great - unless there's a better way to "trial" an edit? Thanks.
Diacritic (2021-10-28 05:41:44+00:00): No problems at all! Sorry it took so long to reply (inlaws, enough said!).

It can be deceptively tricky some times, but don't be afraid! Noone is perfect and iterative improvements are what make OSM great.

For this intersection, I'd suggest considering it as two junctions: The first is  with Lyall/Wilson as a standard # shaped dual carriageway.   In that junction you can add a turn restricton to prevent traffic south-west on lyall from using Wilson as a U-Turn Point.

Then, I would add a separate link way between the Lyall Carriageways for the u-turn. You can make it a one way road to stop the other direction using it as well.

Unfortunately there isn't an easy way to 'trial' an edit; there are more advanced tools for editing but I wouldn't recommend trying those unless you are prepared for a learning curve. Don't be afraid to make mistakes though; be bold, give it a go and we can have a look :)
GITNE (2023-02-06 11:28:01+00:00): The same applies here. Please revert you `destination` tag changes.
tastrax (2021-11-13 05:43:24+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
dan000 (2021-11-13 16:44:09+00:00): Thanks. I think I have fixed all of my bad phone number formats now.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
ortho_is_hot (2021-10-29 02:24:40+00:00): Hi, just commenting because you ticked review, good change for this road.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
just_another_mapper (2021-10-29 11:59:55+00:00): Thanks for reviewing! Figured I'd double check because the tagging seemed wrong but I'm still somewhat of an OSM newb and thought it could have been some Sydney-specific cycleway tagging scheme.
ortho_is_hot (2021-11-06 15:01:20+00:00): No worries, generally the tagging schemes are universal... I'm (was) working on a one-stop wiki page for cycle and related stuff, might have to work on it again
pio2_122 (2021-10-27 15:06:37+00:00): Przypadkowo zdublowała mi się treść komentarza (po zdaniu z pkt. 3) :/
Kehaml (2021-10-29 04:53:32+00:00): Dziękuję za informację, mi też to się średnio podobało, ale myślałem, że tak musi być. Od teraz wiaty przystankowe będą zadaszeniami jak już i w takiej postaci nic nie zasłonią.
JulesGabrielVerne (2021-11-06 22:19:01+00:00): Droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996759840 w ogóle nie istnieje. Na jakiej podstawie to rysowałeś? dzisiaj tam byłem i to są zarośla bez możliwości przejścia
ivanbranco (2021-11-10 20:33:41+00:00): Hi devanyahya,

here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996761934

you used the tag Core=4. By standard all OSM tags are lowercase. Anyway, this wiki page could be of help for you: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:communication%3Dline
tonyf1 (2022-11-01 03:25:06+00:00): Hi, I have ridden what I thought was a cycleway on the east side of Hallam Rd quite a few times. What was your reason for bicycle=no Way: 996765439 
also 998066195 and 1000952152 seem strange. Thanks Tony
timetotom (2022-11-01 07:05:07+00:00): Hi Tony. You're right - it is a shared path along that length of Hallam S road down to the train station. I must've neglected to update the tags at the time. Feel free to update as you see needed. Thanks Tom
ovruni (2021-10-27 05:51:11+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambiado el nombre anterior por el nuevo, sin embargo esto hace que se pierda el nombre anterior, por lo que he recuperado el anterior con la etiqueta old_name.
Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
SafetyIng (2021-10-29 09:08:36+00:00): Hey, your change was false.....
There wasn't two runways, there was only one aeroway=runway and the other was the area of this..... 
aeroway=runway is preserved for ways, not for areas

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:aeroway
Jan Olieslagers (2021-10-29 09:19:46+00:00): That story is well known to me, but I do not accept it. I strongly adhere to the priciple of "One landscape element, one osm entry" (though exceptions are possible). Neither can I accept that runways should not be mapped as areas - there is not a single good argument for that. Except for the analogy with way= and railway= but there is no comparison, because runways are not combined to form routes.
aweech (2021-10-27 14:38:54+00:00): Hi,
I'm confused by your changeset comment. What does AAA Arches National Park mean?
osmviborg (2021-10-27 06:06:02+00:00): The residential road is tagged with
parking:lane:right=perpendicular
No need for driveway's
Carnildo (2021-10-27 17:50:08+00:00): It would be useful to know what roads have been changed and why, particularly when you're bumping a road's importance by two grades, or adding a major road that doesn't show up in any aerial imagery.
Glassman (2021-10-27 18:40:23+00:00): I reverted this changeset. There too many problems. Roads that don't exist, upgrading minor roads, schools that don't exist, roundabout that don't exist. removing portion of SR 20, and more. I'll send you a message with some suggestions on how to contribute to OpenStreetMap.
marczoutendijk (2021-10-30 09:35:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5416

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-27 06:12:24+00:00): see:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4488
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/1200
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/773
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:natural%3Ddesert
osmviborg (2021-10-27 06:31:18+00:00): highway=residential
cycleway=track
then don't tag separate cycleway
eireidium (2021-10-27 06:35:35+00:00): Tx osmviborg - can you please elaborate on this one to help me understand. These are two separate and distinct ways? Yes?
osmviborg (2021-10-27 06:53:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Cycle_tracks
user_5359 (2022-02-21 06:20:12+00:00): Hello! What ist the meaning of the tag no=96?
DWbg (2021-10-27 20:25:21+00:00): Positionierung von Knoten 3680451116 (Römermaske) angepasst; Gebäudeumrisse Mittelschule korrigiert
10992 (2021-11-14 17:44:35+00:00): Thanks for adding Rated Builders London to the map (https://osm.org/node/9203994779).

I note that you haven't added a type.  Is this an office, a shop, or something else?  For now, I have added the tags craft=builder (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dbuilder) and office=company (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dcompany).

You might also want to move the location to a better place (like inside the building, if this is an office).

Also note that OSM isn't an advertising directory, so the description you put isn't really appropriate.

Please also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2935384 and https://osm.org/changeset/113772707.
tntchn (2021-10-30 09:46:59+00:00): 您好，我有注意到您在這個變更集裡好像把很多建築物的標籤直接改成太陽能板。在OSM裡，這樣做會讓原本的建築物變不見了，只剩太陽能板。正確的做法應該是在建築物的上面另外加一個點或是面標示太陽能板，才不會讓原本的建築物不見，還請您如果在往後要做這類編輯時多加留意，謝謝！
Hans Thompson (2021-10-27 16:48:42+00:00): I have never in my 37 years heard this place called igloo city.