piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kylecorry31 (2017-07-10 22:43:23+00:00): Wrong description: added paths to acotes hill cemetary in Chepachet, RI
SomeoneElse (2017-07-11 07:20:08+00:00): Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.  This changesets deletes objects that had been "tidied" by mapping-for-the-QA-tool and could not be deleted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50188052 .
trial (2017-07-24 20:27:02+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai à nouveau supprimé des informations superflues. L'adresse se déduit du positionnement géographique. Seuls les contacts spécifiques à ce nœud doivent y figurer (tél, fax par exemple). Pas le site web s'il n'est particulier à ce nœud (c'est à dire que la page doit être spécifique à cette agence par exemple).
eggie (2017-07-11 06:12:23+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
Alan (2017-07-11 01:36:32+00:00): Hi there, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you explain a bit more what's happening here? Are these technically parks? Why are they all adjacent to each other? Why do they have such strange names? Are these real features on the ground, or is this fake data?
radiotrefoil (2020-10-30 11:42:01+00:00): Just wondering, is Way 480746751 publicly accessible? It appears to go directly through a swamp in a catchment area.
eggie (2017-07-11 06:18:15+00:00): Het is beter niet te beginnen met access=no, want er zijn veel meer uitzonderingen dan je denkt. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50189424
access no en foot=yes eraf halen. Mag je er ook fietsen dan bicycle =no erbij.
Graag reactie..
eggie (2017-07-11 06:19:43+00:00): Leisure=park is de functie. het is een transparant. Je kunt in de Leisure de landuse=grass intekenen.
Simmersnie (2017-07-14 12:15:44+00:00): @Eggie:
Heb rechten van de wegen aangepast (access=yes). Je mag er lopen en fietsen; foot=yes eraf en bicycle=no erbij begrijp ik niet helemaal. Toch beide op yes?
Heb Weide ingetekend binnen terrein van Evenemententerrein.
GerdP (2017-09-07 09:21:29+00:00): Hi!
I wonder if you meant landuse=residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440589729
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440589722
eggie (2017-07-11 06:22:29+00:00): Tip: De naam van de club beter op de adresnode. Het is niet de naam van het gebouw + op de node de aard van de club. leisure=sports_centre ?
Simmersnie (2017-07-14 14:19:22+00:00): ?? De naam van het gebouw is wel degelijk MFC It Joo (Het is een Multi-Functioneel-Centrum, of Dorpshuis). Het is geen club. Binnen het MFC zijn er diverse verenigingen (niet alleen sport) die er hun activiteiten ontplooien. Heb een en ander nog nader gespecificeerd.
nammala (2017-07-11 04:38:32+00:00): Hi Minotauro5,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap(OSM). Noticed that you have been adding parks as nodes . Parks should be given in areas not points and also make sure the data is ground truth.

Regards,
nammala
smaprs (2017-07-11 11:44:35+00:00): No OSM somente vão nomes próprios reais, não nomes genéricos ou eventuais. O operador desta mina é Votorantim Metais.
eggie (2017-07-11 06:25:32+00:00): Van het Brekkenpaad kunnen die accesstags allemaal af. 
Zie schema voor Nederland. Groen is default.

restricties access:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
eggie (2017-07-11 06:35:55+00:00): Bekema's pôle op de goede plek gelegd.
Carnildo (2017-07-11 04:04:23+00:00): When you add a normally-open gate to a road, it's important to add access information.  Routing software is inconsistent about how it treats a gate with no information: some software defaults to "yes", while other software defaults to "no".
mueschel (2017-07-12 11:11:13+00:00): Hi,
when mapping service times, you don't need to use several tags for all the days. They can be combined into one:
service_times=So 07:30; 10:00; 19:00
service_times_1=Sat 19:00
service_times_2=Fr 19:30
service_times_3=Wed 15:00

service_times = Su 07:30, 10:00, 19:00; Sa 19:00; Fr 19:30; We 15:00

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
and to check:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=So%2007%3A30%2C%2010%3A00%2C%2019%3A00%3B%20Sa%2019%3A00%3B%20Fr%2019%3A30%3B%20We%2015%3A00&mode=1&DATE=1499857800000

Cheers, Jan
AjBelnuovo (2017-07-12 21:46:54+00:00): Jan , ok , obrigado pelas informações . Vou editar como de acordo com as informações que me enviou.

Abraços , Airton
autinerd (2017-07-15 18:31:47+00:00): Hey BegbertBiggs,
thank you for contributing to OSM and especially to Schorndorf and the surrounding area!
Just to give you a hint: You don't need to create turn restrictions in a roundabout, these are already implicit, even if the roundabout is split up into several parts!

Greetings from Schorndorf,
Sidney
eggie (2017-07-11 06:44:20+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
TJVP (2017-07-11 11:20:14+00:00): hi Elliott! thanks for helping-- as you can see, I'm still getting used to editing here, and I appreciate your help.

As for Lutherville Timonium and Mays Chapel-- the reason mays chapel has such a big population is because it's just all residential. It's not a "town" as defined by OSM: important urban centre, good range of shops and facilities. Lutherville and Timonium are.
ElliottPlack (2017-07-11 22:34:05+00:00): TJ, that is a great point, and I'm glad you made it. I am happy to help out. Place classification is a contentious thing in the community so I do apologize if it seems harsh. Often times we'll see edits where someone will reclassify every town or do some mechanical edits. In the past, we had Lutherville-Timonium combined as one place. The census chopped them up and now classifies Mays Chapel separately. However, as you pointed out, there is no real "urban centre" in Mays Chapel. At best, you might call it the shops along Padonia. Given this point, I think that perhaps the population alone shouldn't be the deciding factor. Do you want to join our Slack channel to discuss? I think you'd find lots of helpful information there, and good people to chat with about the map. Cheers - Elliott
TJVP (2017-07-11 22:44:18+00:00): I would love to. I "technically" live in MC but I always say Lutherville or Lutherville-Timonium since many sites (including the USPS) don't recognize Mays Chapel as the correct city for me, since it's so small.

I definitely agree population alone should not be the deciding factor.
TJVP (2017-07-11 22:45:56+00:00): Example, from USPS (a list of all valid cities in 21093):

Default City Name in ZIP Code™ 21093
Please use the default city whenever possible.
LUTHERVILLE TIMONIUM MD
Other city names recognized for addresses in 21093

LUTHERVILLE MD
LUTHVLE TIMON MD
TIMONIUM MD
ElliottPlack (2017-07-11 23:03:20+00:00): This situation is pretty unique to Baltimore County and that the mapping community, unfortunately, does not have a great answer for. Baltimore County is somewhat unique in the US in that there are no incorporated towns in it. Thus, things like Towson and Timonium don't have any official existence at the local government level. However, two federal entities define these places differently: the USPS and the Census. The USPS ZIP Codes associated towns (the list you cited) are how people identify with a place here. However, the Census, strangely, has decided to break up the 21093 area into these three zones, and the boundaries are not the same. A few years ago I attempted to streamline the hodge-podge list of towns and villages in Baltimore County objectively, by population. However, as you point out, this numbers-only definition doesn't exactly mirror the situation on the ground.
I think that we should go ahead and make MC a village, and then Timonium a town. I always thought of "Lutherville" as the area south of Ridgely that is mostly residential, thus maybe that should be a village. Timonium, meanwhile, does have an urban core of sorts around the fairgrounds. What do you think?
TJVP (2017-07-11 23:15:19+00:00): in my mind, lutherville includes ridgley and foxtail, so i would be inclined to make it a town, however if you feel it should be a village, i'd be ok with that.

perhaps to make it easier, we should go by USPS instead of the census, being that many people as you said identify based on USPS. I don't know really anybody who says "i live in mays chapel".
ElliottPlack (2017-07-11 23:48:01+00:00): That sounds about right about the town/village issue, especially considering the shops along York Road in lutherville go back decades. So both L/T as town then?
I think that the USPS areas are more identifiable. The only issue is that some people do think of Mays Chapel as a place. I know folks that would definitely say that they live in MC, especially around that Grauls on Padonia. Lutherville or Timonium might be too generic for them. Happy to discuss more. If anything, the point for MC should probably be up closer to what I think of as MC, the area bounded by Timonium, 83, Jennifer and then Mays Chapel Elementary.
TJVP (2017-07-11 23:55:49+00:00): I was just going to say the only part I would consider mays chapel is that grauls area.

I think for this it kind of just has to go by real world experience. sure "official boundaries" are what the census uses but when it comes down to it, I feel like the maps should represent cities and towns as people use them. I'd love to talk more on slack, as that's a much easier way to communicate
ElliottPlack (2017-07-12 00:58:48+00:00): Awesome, there's a link to join on the Maryland wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maryland
nammala (2017-07-11 04:33:20+00:00): Hi mappycv22,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth and present. Noticed that you have been adding fake parks and footways which is inappropriate. Don't try to vandalize the map. Please make sure you don't repeat it again.

Regards,
nammala
Supaplex (2017-10-01 09:11:48+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Upendrakarukonda (2017-07-11 05:13:03+00:00): Hi  mrmelice,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Observed that you deleted the wikidata tag and also added leisure_1 tag for the features. Can you look into this? Wikidata tag seems to be appropriate tag for that highway.

Regards,
Upendra.
Warin61 (2017-07-12 23:12:31+00:00): I'm confused.. 
The relation 6629267 for Artarmon station has 

the tag platform - yep ok
level=1 ... ummm don't think so.
Includes a way as outer .. and that looks to me to be the platform.

And then includes the roof .. which goes outside the outer (this is an error) AND the roof is at level=1 - the same as the platform. 

Needs more work. 
.
I would have the platform with the building as an inner .. but not have the roof in it. Good Luck.
rpy (2017-07-13 03:39:39+00:00): @Warin61 thanks for the feedback. This changeset was primarily intended to define the relations between existing nodes/ways but agree it's a good opportunity to get it right.

The platform is above ground level (the access tunnel to the west is at ground level) so it's mapped as level=1. I've put the platform building at level=1, layer=1 and the platform roof at level=1, layer=2 so it sits above the building. The overpass lift access bridge is then at level=2, layer=3.

I've updated the way for the roof area in changeset 50245205 so it's fully contained within the platform outer and amended the relations as suggested.
HubMiner (2017-07-11 17:15:48+00:00): Thanks for fixing this; I wonder if there is a way to add that it could be closed at park's discretion (access=permissive?).
HubMiner (2017-07-11 17:16:23+00:00): ...without messing up navigation applications.
Carnildo (2017-07-11 18:25:04+00:00): I don't know of any.  Adding an additional "access:conditional=no @ winter" would express the seasonal closure without interfering with normal routing, but I don't know of any software that uses the "access:conditional" tag, and it doesn't cover the fact that the gate can be closed for other reasons (eg. a freak snowstorm in August).
hoserab (2017-07-15 18:03:08+00:00): Why did you do this? I had pretty accurately drawn this school, complete with this inner courtyard. Deleting the way that defined the courtyard broke the relation and now the school building doesn't render at all, it's just a line.

If there's a better way of doing what I'd done I'd love to know.
Warin61 (2017-07-12 22:13:30+00:00): HI,
In doing this the relation 2425110 was broken. The following relations also look to be in trouble
5295065)
2425468)
there maybe others...
nevw (2017-07-11 06:51:13+00:00): The OpenStreetMap is not suitable for adding personal details like "Home in AEU"
CloCkWeRX (2017-07-12 09:00:53+00:00): I've removed this for now as it seems very unlikely to be an actual confectionery store
nevw (2017-07-12 09:36:18+00:00): Thanks
Ok DaRa uses that pretty icon for most edits :/
st1974 (2017-08-18 08:54:50+00:00): Es scheint, dass Ihre Änderung der Pfännerstraße den Marktplatz auseinandergerissen hat. Die Pfännerstraße sollte hier ein geschlossenes Gebiet mit area=yes umfassen. An den Rändern können "duplicate ways" auftreten, da die Straßen befahrbar sind.
mueschel (2017-08-06 13:09:30+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging of these nodes? Most have tags which look like they don't belong to OSM, like these:
Lat=32.231613
Lon=-110.971756
STINTERSEC=STONE AV / UNIVERSITY BL

Jan
mueschel (2017-08-06 13:11:03+00:00): Addendum:
It looks like none of these points is actually part of a road - that is required to be able to use this information e.g. in routing engines.
Dylansc (2017-08-08 21:45:43+00:00): These are all tagged according to People For Bikes OpenStreetMap Tagging Guidelines for HAWKs (signaled crosswalks)... I followed the guidelines listed here

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HuAXQUnCEcv9aLZyIDHkLTJ5ZSKfB-U4MlJSmN-1BLk/edit#heading=h.tle1tl5ruh6c

These points aren't part of the road? What process do you use to integrate point feature like a crosswalk into a road-network?
mueschel (2017-08-08 23:08:41+00:00): This document is a good reference. But there is no reference to the keys Lat, Lon, STINTERSEC I mentioned above, which should not be there.

Ways consist of points, and the crossing tags need to be on a point that belongs to a way. It's as simple as that.
Dylansc (2017-08-15 22:10:50+00:00): Would the best method for me to fix this be for each 131 nodes:
1. go into "edit with iD" edit mode
2. Delete the 3 unnecessary tags (Lat, Lon, and STINTERSEC)
3. snap it to appropriate intersection/roadway

Additionally, I feel I should add some sort of tag that says specifically a HAWK type crossing(?)

Curious of your thoughts mueschel before I go through this undertaking...
mueschel (2017-08-16 08:11:45+00:00): Yes, this is a possible way. 
a) if you use iD, check all tags again after snapping the node to the intersection - some of them are already tagged and this might cause iD to add wrong tags.

b) Are these traffic lights for pedestrians only or do they control the intersection as well?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4963108065
If only for pedestrians, use highway=crossing; if they control the whole intersection, use highway=traffic_lights
There is no further tagging needed. There is nothing special about this type of crossing - they might not be common in the US (I don't know), but there are plenty of them in use in Europe since decades.
Dylansc (2017-08-17 18:54:49+00:00): a) noted

b) I think you are incorrect for "if they control the whole intersection, use highway=traffic_lights, there is no further tagging needed" (first off I think you meant to say highway=traffic_signals). 

according to:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals

"Add the following tags in addition to highway=traffic_signals for pedestrian crossings... crossing=traffic_signals"


So if its a HAWK exclusively for pedestrians it is its own node (on the path of the roadway) it has  tags:
highway=crossing
crossing=traffic_signals

If it is part of an intersection that controls vehicle traffic as well as pedestrian crossing it has tags:
highway=traffic_signals
crossing=traffic_signals

(in addition to whatever other unique tags there should be for each specific node... speedlimit, etc...)

I await your repsonse
mueschel (2017-08-17 18:59:37+00:00): Yes, you are right. I was a too concise here. 
I only described the highway=* tag, not the crossing=*, which is equal in both cases.

"There is no further tagging needed..." was meant to be a new paragraph addressing your question on how to make clear it is HAWK.
Dylansc (2017-08-17 19:07:54+00:00): Great! I'll proceed in correcting the errors one by one. 

Thanks
nevw (2017-07-11 06:35:47+00:00): Hi
is this supermarket named "Sister work place".
If not can you edit it to the correct name of the supermarket.
nevw (2017-07-11 06:51:52+00:00): The OpenStreetMap is not suitable for adding personal details like "Sister work place"
gorodnik+ (2017-07-11 06:31:16+00:00): В названии пакета ошибка. Правильное название - мосты и тропы Кашина
Hjart (2017-07-11 08:59:09+00:00): Hvis du kan finde ud af det så er det generelt bedst at lade det længste stykke (af bl.a. Rylevænget & Svinget her) få historikken. Jeg kan se at du ikke er opmærksom på det.
Chrysopras (2017-07-15 09:52:46+00:00): Hallo karottenjunge1,

vielen Dank für das Mappen dieses bisher nicht eingezeichneten Grünstreifens/Parks in Bad Rappenau!

Ich habe mir das Gelände gestern nochmal angesehen und heute Deine Einzeichnung noch ein bisschen präzisiert (siehe dazu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50301864). Insbesondere habe ich das Gelände im Westen schmaler gemacht, weil die Gärten der Häuser am Prof.-Meisinger-Weg nicht zum öffentlichen Gelände zählen, sondern privat sind (daher gehören sie nicht zum Grünstreifen/Park). Dafür habe ich das Gelände im Osten erweitert, damit der Anschluss an das Minigolf- und Saunagarten-Gelände sichtbar wird.

Den Namen der Fläche habe ich wieder entfernt, da wir „Name“ nur für Eigennamen verwenden, nicht für beschreibende Bezeichnungen (dafür gibt es das Tag description=*).

Beste Grüße – Chrysopras (ein anderer Mapper)
karottenjunge1 (2017-07-17 03:52:47+00:00): Super Danke für die Verbesserungen! Grüße
Hjart (2017-07-11 07:38:20+00:00): Vær venligst meget opmærksom når du splitter veje op som her. Jeg har rettet flere deciderede fejl: Der kom hul i Margueritruten, Egil Fischers Vej fik kun forbindelse til det nordlige ben af Hovedgaden, Sommerbovej (lille grusvej) blev pludselig til en tertiær, osv
Supaplex (2017-07-11 08:42:48+00:00): 請從原先的路徑修改，而不是重畫
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359804571
letihu (2017-07-25 10:19:29+00:00): Bitte mit der app keine doppelten und dreifachen Einträge vornehmen.

    Plötz Dorfplatz (4963207106, v1)
    Plötz Dorfplatz (4963207159, v1)

    Plötz Kreisstraße (4963186110, v1)
    Plötz Kreisstraße (4963186109, v1)

    Plötz Abzweig (4963202659, v1)
    Plötz Abzweig (4963209990, v1)
    Plötz Abzweig (4963217521, v1)
DD1GJ (2017-07-11 08:18:57+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap. The app Maps.Me makes edits to a worldwide visible project and isn't a tool for private travel notices. You will find more informations at http://osm.org.il

Enyoy the Black Forest.
bielebog (2017-07-12 08:48:38+00:00): Routen wie die von Dir per Webeditor  iD eingetragene Krimiroute werden in Openstreetmap als sogenannte Relation eingetragen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route.

Das "mehrfache Nutzen von Punkten mit übereinanderliegenden Wegen" ist naheliegend, aber ist leider so nicht richtig.
bielebog (2017-07-12 09:16:03+00:00): reverted by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50223726
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-08 10:14:21+00:00): Skąd to alt_name=H? http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7387836

Czy to jest jakiś identyfikator budynku?
gregorisan (2018-01-08 10:22:44+00:00): Każdy budynek z kompleksu zamku oznaczony jest dodatkowo liczbą alfabetu. Stad to alt_name:
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-08 20:00:31+00:00): Takie kody raczej wsadza się do tagu ref - name alt_name itd jest dla nazw.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-13 07:49:25+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3264982 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-13 07:49:35+00:00): And https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3264983 ?
eggie (2017-07-11 08:14:55+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
eggie (2017-07-11 08:27:07+00:00): Het bouwterrein taggen als landuse=construction  Het gebied is immers al landuse Industrial getagd.
Wordt er voorlopig niet gebouwd dan landuse=brownfield.
Verandert u dit zelf? Graag reactie.
MO_ChainCraft (2017-07-11 08:28:30+00:00): Zojuist gedaan, bedankt voor het commentaar!
eggie (2017-07-11 15:04:26+00:00): De gebouwen worden tegenwoordig geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG. Doe t.z.t. een verzoek op het forum van OSM onder het draadje Verzoek BAG-import. Zelfde inlog als osm account.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
user_6110846 (2017-09-25 07:55:32+00:00): а чому українською , сама фірма то має сайт

 https://www.poehalisnami.ua/?    У цьому проекті  якщо компанія має бренд російською мовою та вивіску  то так і російською наноситься . Не можна спотворювати інформацію.
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-07-14 19:50:44+00:00): percebi-me que cometi um erro depois de revisar a imagem que te enviei, indiquei mal uma das manobras proibidas

Invés da designar o nó com a restrição 'no_u_turn', deveria ter sido 'only_straight_on'

corrigi-o
Andreeeee (2017-08-19 20:36:08+00:00): mas tu k tomu "Belan" nejaky zdroj? myslim ze to nie je moc oficialny nazov, aspon pre mestsku cast (nepopieram ze mozno sa lokalne tomu tam tak hovori)
eggie (2017-07-11 08:24:05+00:00): highway=road geven we alleen maar aan als niet bekend is om welke classificatie het gaat. Zijn de wegen nog niet af.. dan highway=construction. Vaak zijn zulke wegen over bedrijfsterreinen getagd als highway=service, Zijn het doorgaande wegen dan highway=unclassified.
Het bouwterrein kan beter getagd worden als landuse=construction. Nu ligt volgens mij Industrial bovenop Industrial. dat is niet correct.
MO_ChainCraft (2017-07-11 08:28:03+00:00): Dank je wel voor je commentaar. Ik heb je opmerking over 'landuse' aangepast. De opmerking over wat voor type weg het is kan ik even niet volgen. Het gaat hier om wegen op een industriegebied op eigen grond. Hoe kan ik deze het beste classificeren?
eggie (2017-07-11 08:33:33+00:00): Het meest wordt highway=service gebruikt samen met access=private.
Waar het terrein afgesloten is staat vaak een barrier  Dat kan gate, swing_gate, lift_gate zijn. Kijk even in de wiki wat van toepassing is bij barrier. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features
eggie (2017-07-11 08:34:10+00:00): De barrier zet je op een node op de weg.
eggie (2017-07-11 08:35:37+00:00): highway=road is en tijdelijke oplossing en geeft een foutmelding.
<0174 (2018-04-09 17:35:29+00:00): Ahoj,
rád bych se zeptal na turistickou relaci 6519749:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6519749/history
Na místě jsem si nevšiml žádného značení, ani smazaného (alespoň mezi Výšinkou a Liščí horou). Tvar relace mi taky moc nesedí na turistickou trasu. Rád bych se zeptal, co je to za trasu.
delmard (2018-04-09 19:43:46+00:00): Ahoj, trasa je znacena jednosmerne, v tomto useku od Lisci hory k Vysince, znaceni je bily trojuhelnik v cervenem poli, nevede podle turistickych tras, puvod trasy neznam.
<0174 (2018-04-11 08:01:48+00:00): OK, díky za info, je fakt, že jsem šel směrem od Výšinky, i když jsem se párkrát ohlížel, jestli někde nějaké značení není (trasa se mi renderuje v GPS, tak mě to mátlo). Pak je otázka, jestli je to vůbec turistická trasa :)
Hjart (2017-07-11 08:37:47+00:00): Jeg har lige rettet et par forbindelser i Svenstrup her