piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheAnimappor (2019-11-04 17:03:59+00:00): I was using Maxar Imagery.  Right now, that imagery shows some links, not paved, are being used by cars.  I can add those in if you prefer and fix the bridge tags?
Leo Slager (2019-06-21 23:13:46+00:00): review:
het dubbele hek tussen de parkeerplaats en de ZO hoek van het terrein lijkt een beetje vreemd. Is dat daadwerkelijk een dubbel hek ?
user_10097316 (2019-06-25 05:06:26+00:00): ah, goed gespot, nee dat is 1 hek. Zal dat corrigeren.
BCNorwich (2019-06-26 15:48:00+00:00): Hi, 

I think there may be some anomaliy with the highways you added around and through the Euroscan Frieght Xray building. Several sections are duplicated, please look at ways 91286064, 699003103, 699003099, 699003104 and 699003102.

One section is triplicated, please look at ways  699003101, 699003120 and 699003100.

Or are these ways supposed to be side by side?

Regards Bernard.
Hawaiianblue (2019-06-26 15:54:42+00:00): There should be one route through each building, the arrows appear to be doubled up on one of them, but I can't see a way of correcting it.
BCNorwich (2019-06-26 16:42:15+00:00): Hi, 
Yes I think it's difficult to lift one of a duplicated way of the other in iD. 

The ways have sightly differing tags. If I remove the superfluous ways and keep all tags on the remaining way would you then be OK to check the tagging? I can comment here the ways that need checking.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-06-26 16:46:33+00:00): I just had another thought, I could separate the duplicated way and save the edit. Then you could see where the problems are. What do you think?
Matthieu Marrast (2025-04-01 09:03:01+00:00): Bonjour. Vous avez supprimé les bâtiments des 4 et 4bis chemin du Page à Colomiers, alors qu'ils existent toujours ?!
Leo Slager (2019-06-21 23:20:40+00:00): access=private op de gates is prima.
Aan de N-zijde bevinden zich ook nog twee gates. Daar mag nu alle verkeer doorheen. Moet dat ook niet aangepast worden ?
user_10097316 (2019-06-25 05:01:46+00:00): Ik zal ze allemaal extra nalopen.
Leo Slager (2019-06-21 23:24:24+00:00): Dag Vincent,
Je zou het hele veld kunnen voorzien van een omlijning met als tag:
landuse=construction.
Dan is voor iedereen duidelijk dat daar gebouwd gaat worden. En tzt kun je dan de gouwen laten importeren van het Kadaster.
user_10097316 (2019-06-25 04:56:50+00:00): ah, doe ik!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 23:37:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71498913 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
jqngarcia (2019-06-22 06:54:05+00:00): He modificado tu edición, el edificio completo no es la Academia de Baile, he añadido un nodo con la Academia, sus datos y clasificación, si tienes pregunta contacta conmigo
UMR_Passages (2019-06-28 13:05:49+00:00): #UMRPassages #Passages #recherche
Frans S (2019-07-04 16:07:40+00:00): Hello,  Thanks for mapping here. A request. After reviewing mapped work we noticed that you did not square the buildings here. Please use the Q key anytime you have mapped a buildiings
reviewing this video might be helpful
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4Mfpnvp6Y8&list=PLb9506_-6FMHULD9iDUAh-4qpxKdVspnD&index=13&t=0s
Here are more instruction videos
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLb9506_-6FMHULD9iDUAh-4qpxKdVspnD
best regards


Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 23:37:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 71498440.
ZimLostPvPVPto7yearoldasian7 (2019-06-22 11:35:39+00:00): very persistent
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-22 00:37:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71499577 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
ZimLostPvPVPto7yearoldasian7 (2019-06-22 11:35:05+00:00): okay i made a change again
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-22 00:37:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 71499050.
Paweł Bogubowicz (2019-07-09 13:27:18+00:00): Kolejny falstart.....na słupkach nazwy zmieniono dopiero kilka dni temu....np. 01.07 jeszcze była stara nazwa
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-22 01:37:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71500093 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
user_5359 (2019-06-22 07:09:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t use abbreviation for highway names. For details read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-22 01:37:03+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 71499708.
narceliodesa (2019-06-23 13:41:06+00:00): A rua existe sim, favor verificar nas imagens mais recentes ( Maxar ).
Supaplex (2019-06-22 09:50:44+00:00): 用motorcycle:charging=yes表示有充電服務
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71500190
aharvey (2019-06-22 06:30:58+00:00): Reverting ...these features are already mapped in OSM.
divya_sree (2019-07-11 06:00:34+00:00): Hi Farras,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the

"way 699019698
way 701224225
way 701224224" 

classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. 

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.
Farras (2019-07-12 01:09:30+00:00): Hi, divya_sree. Looks like you're right. I've corrected the data. Thank you.
Rainero (2019-06-22 20:25:37+00:00): Hallo RoHyman,

willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast das Häkchen zur Überprüfung deiner Änderungen gesetzt; daher habe ich mir diese Änderungen angeschaut.

1. Schau dir mal die Unterscheidung highway=path / track an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=track?uselang=de#highway.3Dtrack_oder_highway.3Dpath.3F
Ein track ist immer ein Weg, der von zweispurigen Fahrzeugen befahren werden kann, path hingegen ist ein schmaler Weg für Fußgänger und/oder Radler.
2. Die Wege sehen aus wie genau nachgezeichnete GPS-Spuren. Mach dir nicht zuviel Mühe, das so zentimetergenau zu zeichnen. Speziell im Wald sind GPS-Spuren nicht so genau. 
3. Die eingetragenen Zugangsbeschränkungen sind zuviel des Guten. Bei einem Waldweg steht normalerweise Zeichen 260 (gesperrt für Kfz und Motorräder) mit Zusatzzeichen 1026-37 (forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei) oder 1026-38 (land- und forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei). Das wird mit motor_vehicle=forestry bzw. motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry in OSM eingetragen. Damit ist alles andere überflüssig.

Servus,
Rainer
muralito (2019-06-22 14:32:41+00:00): Hola. ¿El numero no iria en "ref"?
AgusQui (2019-06-22 17:50:09+00:00): Nacho estas haciendo lio, cambiaste de posicion varias que habia relevado y las ubicaste mal, la de Quinteros por ej nada que ver
ignaciolep (2019-06-24 18:45:58+00:00): @muralito me falta agregar el ref a las que no lo tienen pero el número está a la vista como parte del nombre, por eso lo agregué en name. Tanto la app para usar las bicis como el mapa de la ciudad muestran en número como parte del nombre.

@Agus seguimos por privado a ver como podemos ajustar eso.
ignaciolep (2019-06-25 03:39:23+00:00): Listo Agus: changeset 71582619
abrensch (2019-06-23 21:31:48+00:00): Was hast Du denn hier angestellt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6564230851
bison166 (2019-06-24 05:32:00+00:00): oh...hab ich wohl vergessen die Straßen zu verbinden. Erledigt.
Danke für den Hinweis.
SomeoneElse (2019-06-28 12:28:42+00:00): Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288175718

Hello,
What is the evidence that this track should have an access tag "motor_vehicle=yes"? It's signed as a public footpath to the east, and just looks like a private road to me, for use by people accessing the farm at the end.
Best Regards,
Andy
tmmanish (2019-07-02 10:10:08+00:00): Hi Andy,


Thanks for looking into the edit. The access tags were added based on the possibility of our delivery partners to travel through this road. But as you suggested, reverting back my changes on access tags and leaving the newly added roads as it is. Do let me know if those roads are supposed to be reverted as well.
Changeset #71815118

Regards,
tmmanish
SomeoneElse (2019-07-02 10:38:13+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for that.
Best Regards,
Andy
Warin61 (2019-10-06 23:35:10+00:00): Hi,
As relation 9712537 Ball's Pyramid has only one member so  this can be a simple way. I have changed this.
user_5359 (2019-06-22 06:42:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your change set because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
freebeer (2019-06-23 00:37:03+00:00): mojn,

another zero-length way popped up during your restoration.

arrgh, which direct reference i lost.

try https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6564261269 which belongs to the new 699... item as well as the original and correct 29... with the same tags.

probably i can nuke these meself without bothering you, but, well, pro - to - col and all that.

thanks.  more details on request.
Brian@Brea (2019-06-23 09:11:30+00:00): I find it fascinating actually...I'll hit this one but you are welcome to grab any others created. Also you might take a look at EPCOT since its even more complicated than the other parks.
nevw (2019-06-28 01:20:22+00:00): Hi
please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 to help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 00:40:51+00:00): relations are not used for this.
merged your info with number 4.
Other bussinesses in the same building will  have a seperate number (4a etc)
ChehrehBargi (2019-06-23 19:25:14+00:00): این مسیر ورودی با راهبند برای سواره و پیاده است. مواردی اطمینان ندارید ویرایش انجام ندهید.
هر موردی که شک داشتید در گروه OSM ایران مطرح کنید
با سپاس
fereydoon555 (2019-07-20 04:35:07+00:00): سلام من تگ
 private 
زدم که دسترسی خاص بدم این مشکل داره؟
fereydoon555 (2019-07-20 04:48:05+00:00): راهبند زدین ممنون
ChehrehBargi (2019-09-22 09:04:04+00:00): اوکی، زنده باشید.
iWowik (2019-06-24 21:30:22+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, соглашение о наименовании дорог.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать. 

Пример вашего неверного тегирования:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437302039/history
iWowik (2019-06-24 21:45:09+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятые соглашения
1) о нумерации домов
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr#.D0.90.D0.B4.D1.80.D0.B5.D1.81.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.28addr:.3C.2A.3E.3D.2A.29

2) о наименовании дорог.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

    Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать

Пример ваших ошибок:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699029886/history
Dimacn (2019-07-19 16:51:00+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение карты. Но пожалуйста придерживайтесь правил оформления:

На тропинках, газонах и жилых домах не должно быть названий, тем более таких выдуманных как у вас.
user_5359 (2019-06-22 13:21:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check: Is this building a restaurant or pharmarcy? see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668383029
Hjart (2019-06-22 08:35:37+00:00): makes no sense to add surface=* to an adress?
Chau (2019-06-22 09:47:11+00:00): I do agree, can I revert or should I just change it back in a new commit?
Hjart (2019-06-22 09:54:58+00:00): It's easier to just change it back. Won't make much of difference anyway.
tordans (2019-06-22 15:32:05+00:00): Thanks
Zabir91 (2019-06-23 16:04:54+00:00): Thank you for your contribution to OSM.
 You can add the "description" tag in the POI for describing it.
Zabir91 (2019-06-23 16:06:08+00:00): (Please do not add english name in the name=* field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
Zabir91 (2019-06-23 16:25:42+00:00): Welcome to open street map. Thank you so much for your contribution :)
Instead of adding "I want to contribute..." in changeset description, add waht you did actually in this changeset description. Like: added house; added hispital, added road. Name correction etc.

Ser here for good changeset comment: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Zabir91 (2019-06-23 15:52:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution.
(Please do not add english name in the name=* field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
Zabir91 (2019-06-23 15:53:44+00:00): Thank you for you contribution to OSM :)
(Please do not add english name in the name=* 
field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-11 18:59:29+00:00): جناب fereydoon555@ اتصالاتی که شما آن ها را حذف کرده اید، همگی وجود دارند که به شرح زیر هستند؛
بهار7 با راهبند متصل است.
مالک اشتر 19 به صورت مسیر پیاده متصل است.
مسیری که خ شهدای شهرداری را به مالک اشتر به صورت سواره‌رو متصل میکرد به صورت راه پیاده متصل کرده‌اید.
با سپاس از سهیم شدنتان در بهسازی نقشه دقت کنید که عدم اتصال به معنی وجود ساختمان یا دیوار بین دو مسیر است.
fereydoon555 (2019-11-12 08:54:56+00:00): سلام خیلی ممنون از نکاتی که تذکر دادیدبخش زیادی از این ویرایش ها براساس گزارش کاربران اپلیکیشن نشان است.
 حتما به این موارد دقت بیشتری خواهم کرد. با تشکر
ChehrehBargi (2019-11-13 09:09:14+00:00): سلام
اوکی؛ موفق باشید.
DiogoBaptista98 (2019-06-24 14:57:29+00:00): As áreas criadas apresentam erros de construção como pontos sobrepostos e pontos duplicados numa linha. Podes consultar os erros aqui: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
Entretanto já tratei de os corrigir.
hvalentim (2019-06-25 16:23:50+00:00): Constituir uma malha consistente de uso do solo, reaproveitando e conciliando com o que já existe é um processo que dificilmente não envolve nalguma das suas etapas "warnings" e estados de sobreposição de pontos/troços.
BCNorwich (2019-06-22 14:34:22+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've placed your water tower POI in the middle of a service road. This does not look correct especially as the area is for wastewater treatment. Could you check the validity and placement please?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-07-06 08:37:18+00:00): No response so POI removed.
kudlav (2020-01-14 22:38:03+00:00): Hi,  
I've just noticed you had mapped forest inside urban park. According to my opinion it's not good practise and thus these changeset should be reverted. Tag leisure=park should be used for urban parks with grassy areas, tree and bushes. Please compate these two tags:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest

Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments to help other mappers understand what you are doing and don't forget to include source of your changes.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

changesets:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71505155  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71505691  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71505095  
also please look into your log and check if there are any simillar changesets

--
[kudlav](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kudlav)
kudlav (2020-02-02 15:47:39+00:00): Forest reverted in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80439299
kudlav (2020-01-14 22:37:50+00:00): Hi,  
I've just noticed you had mapped forest inside urban park. According to my opinion it's not good practise and thus these changeset should be reverted. Tag leisure=park should be used for urban parks with grassy areas, tree and bushes. Please compate these two tags:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest

Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments to help other mappers understand what you are doing and don't forget to include source of your changes.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

changesets:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71505155  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71505691  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71505095  
also please look into your log and check if there are any simillar changesets

--
[kudlav](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kudlav)
kudlav (2020-02-02 15:34:35+00:00): Forest reverted with: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80438968
Supaplex (2019-08-09 16:46:35+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Leo Slager (2019-06-22 22:39:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Steffan Hoeke (2019-06-29 05:35:32+00:00): Ondertussen ook gezien, dank voor de tips :)
kudlav (2020-01-14 22:38:00+00:00): Hi,  
I've just noticed you had mapped forest inside urban park. According to my opinion it's not good practise and thus these changeset should be reverted. Tag leisure=park should be used for urban parks with grassy areas, tree and bushes. Please compate these two tags:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest

Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments to help other mappers understand what you are doing and don't forget to include source of your changes.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

changesets:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71505155  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71505691  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71505095  
also please look into your log and check if there are any simillar changesets

--
[kudlav](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kudlav)
kudlav (2020-02-02 15:58:55+00:00): Forest reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80439594
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 01:05:49+00:00): De landuse=* die je bedoelt bestaat uit veel kleine stukjes die dan ook nog allemaal aan elkaar zijn gekleefd.
Met de editor iD waar je mee werkt zou ik daar dus niet aan beginnen. De kans dat je daarmee de kaart zwaar beschadigt ligt dicht bij 100 procent. Als je iets zou verschuiven wordt alles wat er aan vast zit meegetrokken.
Je kunt het rustig zo laten staan.
abakus_uploader (2019-06-22 22:30:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
NetWormKido (2019-07-27 09:25:42+00:00): Больше так не делай. Вернул как было.
abakus_uploader (2019-06-22 22:30:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Steffan Hoeke (2019-06-22 10:31:09+00:00): Apologies, first section (Delftsekade - Damoudersstraat) is not closed
Leo Slager (2019-06-22 22:47:39+00:00): So I removed the tag motorvehicle:conditional for the first section
Steffan Hoeke (2019-06-29 05:34:17+00:00): Thanks!
Mazda05 (2019-06-22 13:34:16+00:00): Нет причин для изменения класса дороги на tertiary и/или unclassified, так как автодорога федерального значения А154 на всём своём протяжении удовлетворяет необходимым требованиям highway=primary по соглашению о классификации автодорог в ВикиПроекте Россия https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification. Цитаты: «highway=primary автомобильные дороги регионального значения, соединяющие крупные города и/или областные центры, дороги межрегионального значения, не являющиеся trunk» 
«highway=tertiary более важные автомобильные дороги среди прочих автомобильных дорог местного значения, например соединяющие районные центры с сёлами, а также несколько сёл между собой» 
«highway=unclassified остальные автомобильные дороги местного значения, образующие соединительную сеть дорог»
Mazda05 (2019-06-22 13:34:21+00:00): There is no reason to change the class of the road to "highway=tertiary" or "highway=unclassified", since the highway of federal significance A154 throughout its length meets the necessary requirements for "highway=primary" according to the agreement on the classification of roads in OSMWiki Russia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Quotes: «highway=primary - highways of regional significance connecting major cities and / or regional centers, highways of interregional significance that are not "highway=trunk"» 
«highway=tertiary - is more important roads, among other local roads, for example, connecting district centers with villages, as well as several villages among themselves» 
«highway=unclassified - other local roads forming the connecting road network»