piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
luiswoo (2021-04-05 09:43:23+00:00): Для навигации не существует дорог с тегами constraction, road.
eggie (2021-03-29 22:27:51+00:00): Pepijn.. Paden waar routerelaties lopen kun je beter niet opknippen met editor iD  De routevolgorde gaat dan verloren.
Met editor en een berg ervaring kan dat wel.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710    

De  mtb route ligt nu door elkaar.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-29 22:30:54+00:00): Maar wellicht was dat al het geval??  
Je edits... http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101940795

gr eggie
user_12950232 (2021-03-30 11:59:49+00:00): Bedankt Eggie, staat genoteerd! Die MTB route is sowieso onvolledig. Als het lukt ben ik van plan die route later nog in orde te maken.
eggie (2021-03-30 12:07:59+00:00): Mooi... de uitdaging heet dat.. 
Het lukt alleen met josm.. in het relatie venster zorg je dan dat alle routedelen aansluiten.
Succes
Eggie
Trubalu (2021-04-10 08:26:11+00:00): It seems like this import didn't check for already mapped buildings I've done a couple days before importing. My import was based on aerial imagery, and might therefore be less accurate than the import. What is the way forward? Should I ask an admin to revert my changesets done in this region?
Mathias Haugsbø (2021-04-10 11:58:48+00:00): There is no need to revert your changes in the region.

As a general rule, this import has the most accurate and correct building positions.

The import will merge existing buildings at the position (keep all tags, but replace geometry). So it should be fine.
- I have also seen that some (but very few) of the imported buildings are quite off, in these cases it's reasonable to draw after the imagery instead of the imported building.
- read more about the import here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Norway_Building_Import

Are there any buildings you think about in particular?
- I try to verify all imported buildings to check if they are aligned with imagery (not too far off)
Mathias Haugsbø (2021-04-10 14:03:56+00:00): @Trubalu I saw the comments in the Norwegian chat room. I will consult with them on how to best solve this, and try to identify why this happened
Mathias Haugsbø (2021-04-10 15:22:46+00:00): @Trubalu Thanks for letting me know, I must have done something wrong in JOSM. The import scripts itself worked as it should, so the  fault is on me.

All issues in Askvoll kommune have now been resolved :)
Trubalu (2021-04-13 14:55:09+00:00): Forgive me my rather late answer. Thank you very much for looking into it, and resolving the issue - it's highly appreciated.
MxxCon (2021-03-30 03:51:53+00:00): Hello.
A small advice is to try to submit your edits after you finished editing in each geographic area, be it a block, a city or perhaps even a county. Keeping your edits grouped geographically together makes it easier for other people to understand what you are trying to edit and help you if you encounter any problems.
Otherwise, if you don't limit each changeset to a specific geographic region, the way OpenStreetMap works is it will notify a lot of people about your edits, people that are really far away from where you edit and don’t have local knowledge to assist. For example, this edit of yours notified pretty much everybody who watches the map in the eastern US and Canada.😅 It's not the end of the world, but it's best to submit your edits grouped to smaller geographic areas. 👍
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-29 14:32:25+00:00): Hello!

You used
material=sand_stone
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/276104600/history

Have you maybe meant
material=sandstone
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-29 14:32:30+00:00): Hello!

You used
material=sand_stone
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/276104591/history

Have you maybe meant
material=sandstone
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
woodpeck_repair (2021-03-29 21:37:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 101387270, 101845019, 101851411, 101865885, 101867098, 101868474, 101868975, 101869548, 101870391, 101870497.
flohoff (2021-03-30 11:00:26+00:00): Moin,
warum meinst du das das hier kein trunk_link ist?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107970553

Flo
FraukeLeo (2021-03-30 11:34:29+00:00): Weil https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104128157 auch keiner ist :) Du kannst gern beides ändern, aber dann einheitlich. Ein link ist für mich ein Straßenstück, das zwei weitere (durchgehende) Straßen querverbindet. Aber ich sehe keinen Grund, wieso ein hw=trunk einfach so in einen hw=trunk_link übergehen soll :) an stellen wie hier: https://osm.org/go/0GkdVvVvc--?m= teilen wir ja auch nicht den tertiary in tertiary_links auf, oder?
felipeeugenio (2021-03-29 23:18:40+00:00): Hola Eduardo, por favor aclarar estas ediciones. no puede tener 80km/hr de velocidad máxima una salida. Es las autopistas es 50 o 40 dependiendo de la salida. A qué te refieres con "reglamento"?
En zonas urbanas en chile la velocidad maxima es de 50
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101942454
felipeeugenio (2021-03-29 23:12:31+00:00): Hola Eduardo. Cual es la fuente para estos cambios?
Conozco Puren y no se si esa entrada es de 80. es un sector totalmente urbano. Igual lo de Antofagasta.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101942531
Zeno Kugy (2021-03-29 22:57:51+00:00): Please stop removing the hiking paths in the Brenner area. I have hiked on them, they exist. The Postwald you just keep deleting claiming that is private is managed by the South Tyrol government (http://www.provinz.bz.it/land-forstwirtschaft/wald-holz-almen/downloads/NESBA_Sterzing.pdf), so it is public. And by the way if a path is closed to bikes or cars you can set the appropriate tabs instead of deleting everyhing.
stlmapper74 (2021-03-30 22:09:57+00:00): Ignore that note about Marcus Theater. That was an old autosaved message from another edit.
Zeno Kugy (2021-03-29 22:53:43+00:00): Please stop removing hiking paths in the Brenner area. I have hiked on them so they exist. 
This road I just reverted is part of the Tiroler Hohenweg. 
You keep deleting it saying there is a Fahrverbot. Then instead of deleting just change the settings of motor vehicle to "private" (and actually this was also already set)
JodaStephen (2021-03-30 08:27:54+00:00): Hi! I see you added tunnel=yes to these footpaths through buildings. Should it be tunnel=building_passage? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101943684
DaveArq (2021-03-30 09:05:23+00:00): Yes you're right, corrected now
SomeoneElse (2021-03-29 23:10:57+00:00):     Relation North Central Constituency 1961 (11890951) (as outer)
    Relation North East Constituency 1961 (11890950) (as outer)
    Relation Glasnevin Ward (1946) (5648457) (as outer)
    Relation Dublin No 4 BEA (12427794) (as outer)
    Relation Linenhall Ward 1838 (12164381) (as outer)
    Relation Linenhall Ward 1836 (12164380) (as outer)
    Relation Dublin Central (5134722) (as outer)
    Relation North Inner City LEA (4658842) (as outer)
    Relation North West Constituency (11835396) (as outer)
    Relation 11827398 (as outer)
    Relation Drumcondra Ward 1888 (7973585) (as outer)
    Relation Drumcondra, Clonliffe and Glasnevin Township 1878-1900 (6572604) (as outer)
    Relation Suburban District of Dublin 1861 Census (6340790) (as outer)
    Relation Ballymun LEA (5518234) (as outer)
    Relation Dublin North-West (5146593) (as outer)
    Relation Dublin North City No.1 West Registrars District 1885 (7524850) (as outer)
    Relation Dublin City 1838 (6725400) (as outer)
    Relation Dublin City pre 1849 (6102112) (as outer)
    Relation Dublin City 1849 (6099274) (as outer)
    Relation St. Georges Ward 1840 (5608664) (as outer)
    Relation Mid Dublin 1920 (11835395) (as outer)
    Relation Finglas and Glasnevin Registrars District 1885 (7411485) (as outer)
    Relation St. Michans's Constituency (11827396) (as outer)
    Relation Dublin 7 (1165966) (as outer)
    Relation Glasnevin Ward 1878 (6575094) (as outer)
    Relation Royal Canal (2807250) (as main_stream)
    Relation Inn's Quay Ward (1946) (5613555) (as outer)
    Relation College Green Constituency (8631396) (as outer)
    Relation Inns Quay Ward 1849 (5535414) (as outer)
    Relation Berkeley Street (7822551) (as outer)
    Relation Dublin 9 (1177791) (as outer)
◪ Jarv (2021-03-31 05:36:56+00:00): You updated the note on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/282651672 , however in this change set you left the road after the end of motorway restrictions as motorway_link , surely this must be trunk_link . If motorway restrictions ended near the roundabout it wouldn't be an issue but this is over 350m of road.
Also surely the limit of this is still 70mph since it is a sliproad to a dual carriageway (which also happens to be a motorway).
Nathan_A_RF (2021-03-31 22:12:08+00:00): I wasn't too sure how to mark this, please feel free to make any changes necessary
village (2021-03-31 18:59:56+00:00): Warum hast du die Döllnitzbahn aus dem MDV herausgenommen?Die Züge fahren doch im Rahmen des MDV-Tarifs.
route=railway ist offenbar auch nicht für Linien(dienste) vorgesehen.
user_10241830 (2021-03-31 19:05:17+00:00): Hallo,

die bisherige Relation ist schlicht und ergreifend keine Relation für die auf der Döllnitzbahn stattfindenden regelmäßigen Schulfahrten (und nur die kommen hier überhaupt in Frage), sondern eine Relation für die Döllnitzbahn als Verkehrsweg.

In OSM pflegen wir eine Trennung zwischen Gleisinfrastruktur (route=tracks), Verkehrswegen (route=railway) und den tatsächlich darauf verkehrenden Zügen (route=train). Nur letztere kommen in eine Verkehrsverbund-Relation.

Es hindert dich nichts daran, die Schulfahrten als PT-Relation (also mit allen Haltestellen) zu mappen. Ich habe es deshalb nicht gemacht, weil vielerorts noch die Bahnsteige fehlen und ich diese nicht ohne Ortskenntnis nur anhand der Luftbilder eintragen wollte.
village (2021-03-31 23:20:38+00:00): klar, verstehe. deshalb auch route=railway und keine Stops.

das sollte lieber jemand mit mehr Ortskenntnis machen, ich hab genug mit dem Reparieren in Leipzig zu tun.
Supaplex (2021-03-30 03:47:16+00:00): 登山口請用 highway=trailhead，並且併到步道線段上
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101943927
Supaplex (2021-03-30 06:47:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3307179418
已經有標示了
ElliottPlack (2021-03-30 01:09:17+00:00): Looking good here Mike!
3ngineer (2021-04-01 16:41:31+00:00): Why can't the name tag be used on yard tracks in addition to track_ref? Otherwise, the track names don't appear on most maps.
clay_c (2021-04-01 19:04:30+00:00): Track numbers are not names. I don't think they belong in the name tag. That said, it's a pretty small issue and I don't care if you re-add them. 

If you're looking for a renderer that surfaces track numbers, check out OpenRailwayMap.
user_5359 (2021-04-22 18:39:44+00:00): Hello! Did you know the key check_date (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date) ?
ash_win (2021-04-01 08:13:52+00:00): Hi stephaniekc,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 177410120,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102106149
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101944459
mitchef (2021-03-31 09:19:46+00:00): Hi there TorquayTiger. Welcome to OSM. Great job adding this missing bit of road. I've added the ped crossings for this intersection
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 09:52:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103129129 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted about their edits but problems still persist.
mueschel (2021-04-05 09:20:51+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? I guess instead of 'cach_out' you meant 'cash_out'? 
And, both cash_in and cash_out are 'no'. What service does this atm provide?
Ehsan Chavoshi (2021-04-05 11:47:14+00:00): corrected. thanks.
aweech (2021-03-30 13:16:53+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap; thank you for your contributions! Can I ask what source you were using to get names for "Underpass" and "Cottonwood Drive" across I-15 from Red Cliffs? Is it something you saw going by?
mitchef (2021-03-31 09:28:54+00:00): Hello again TorquayTiger. Residential swimming pools are actually ok to map. You'll notice a lot have been added around Torquay as water sources for firefighting. This one was just missing the access=private tag
DressyPear4 (2021-03-31 16:45:19+00:00): Olá, Se o local não possui nome deixar esse campo em branco.
Para definir telhado de uma olhada aqui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
Para material aqui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:material
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101945446
OddlyAngled (2021-03-30 21:25:50+00:00): I'm not sure what the right tagging is but now this is inconsistent, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1167181 is still using waterway=riverbank
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101945534
ZeLonewolf (2021-03-30 21:59:13+00:00): Hi there!  So, I'm actually working through a defined procedure to clean up river tagging nationwide and I'm currently working California.  This was the first step which is to look for untagged river areas and give them the missing water=river tag.  The link below describes the procedure I'm using, and in California I'm working from north to south.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Procedure/River_modernization

Feel free to jump on the OpenStreetMap US Slack (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) channel #local-california if you want to chat more about the project!
OddlyAngled (2021-03-30 23:00:47+00:00): cool, just didn't know if you were missing riverbank relations by accident or if you'd come back on a second pass. thx
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-22 09:11:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105124259 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
carciofo (2021-12-30 21:08:50+00:00): Hi, just wondering if there was any reason to add the addr:city to streets in Plantation and remove the state from the county in the TIGER tags? The former gets reported as an error in OSM Inspector. Would like to understand the reason before reverting. Thanks!
txemt (2021-12-31 00:42:40+00:00): Um........lets chalk that up to a newbie editor getting his feet wet in OSM. =)
TomPar (2021-04-03 01:26:07+00:00): You tagged private parcels as "leisure=nature_reserve" which will likely mean they will show up on third-party maps.  You also removed the "landuse=conservation" tag which has been used a lot by multiple mappers in MA.

Why?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101946207
WoodWoseWulf (2021-03-30 02:47:25+00:00): Hiya cprimack,

A very similar nature reserve is already on the map - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29693636

Are these the same thing?
cprimack (2021-03-30 03:02:44+00:00): Yes they are, sorry about that. I've been trying to delete it.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-03-30 03:11:31+00:00): No worries, I have removed the duplicate for you.
redd (2022-08-20 09:20:14+00:00): Hi Gustry,
thanks for your continous contribtutions to OpenStreetMap. Regarding you change on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923589306. You used the value booking=recommended, but this is not widely in usage. Indeed, this is the only use.
I guess you could replace this with reservation=recommended? This tag would be much better documented. 
Can you have a look again on this one?
Thanks,
redd
user_5359 (2021-04-04 09:09:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add any hashtag to the data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-22 09:11:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105124259 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
user_5359 (2021-03-30 19:32:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
tonyf1 (2021-11-01 23:18:02+00:00): see  Changeset #113258784
Allison P (2021-07-20 18:53:03+00:00): This is definitely a residential road. I updated it as such.
somaswap (2021-07-21 09:31:47+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.
Apologies for the incorrect road classification,I'll ensure not to repeat such errors going forward.
Thanks again,Looking forward to learn more from you!

Regards,
somaswap
nitro_expander (2021-03-30 05:06:54+00:00): has to connect this path with existing roads
ash_win (2021-04-01 11:09:42+00:00): Hi jackwu_M,
Deleted floating footway as it is not a footway kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102120262
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101954216
GOwin (2021-03-31 11:55:35+00:00): Hi Eugene.  Can you elaborate the bike lane placement ?

The line representing S.B. Cabahug highway is drawn from A. Del Rosatio going to A.C. Cortes Avenue. So are you trying to say that it's on the left of the road?

This is also a one-way road, are contra-flow cycling allowed?

If that's the case, there's a typo in your tag, it should be "cycleway:left=lane" and not cycleway:left:bicycle=lane". 

Also, thanks for adding the bicycle=designated tag, which indicated mandatory use of the bike lane for cyclists.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
TravGW (2021-03-30 15:18:36+00:00): You and your mapping team need to take better care when deleting hotel nodes. Currently you are deleting them without copying over additional data to the hotel building. We are losing good data because of this. For example in this changeset when you deleted the hotel node we lost the phone number, website, and address for this hotel. You must copy this data over the new hotel building.

Please read the wiki for guidance when mapping hotels. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
4004 (2021-04-05 00:16:00+00:00): ворота уже стоят. разделил на их месте дорогу, но сквозных маршрутов через парк не должно быть в любом случае, дороги внутри отмечены как приват
user_7130456 (2021-04-03 08:12:09+00:00): 我草泥马，傻逼？删道路干嘛
os-emmer (2024-02-26 18:17:15+00:00): Hi Acrateoftuna,
is this a station of the Queensland State Emergency Service?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8573859139
Acrateoftuna (2024-02-26 21:14:39+00:00): Hi os-emmer,
Yes that is correct.
os-emmer (2024-02-28 15:51:11+00:00): Thanks for the quick answer. I updated the tagging. If you know the name of the station it would be nice to add too.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Wilmer Osario (2021-06-06 17:12:07+00:00): Esta no es la manera de hacer grandes masas de vegetación. Deberían hacerse mediante multipolígonos.

Si me permite, puedo hacer ese trabajo.
pantufla (2021-06-06 17:48:45+00:00): Hola, Wilmer. Intenté hacerlo poco a poco para ir cubriendo zonas que de foto satelital se hacían parecidas por si en un futuro se quiere editar las etiquetas y hacerlas más específicas. Si te parece importante cambiarlo, siéntete libre de hacerlo. Todavía faltan igual muchas otras áreas por poner la vegetación. ¿Quizá es mejor enfocarse en esas primero?
Wilmer Osario (2021-06-22 11:50:32+00:00): Acabé gran parte del multipolígono: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12872383

Aún me falta trazar los "inner"

Cubre toda la masa arbórea del Ávila desde Maiquetía hasta Higuerote
Allison P (2021-03-30 15:09:10+00:00): This service road does not have a name. Ada County does not assign names to service roads. Also, you didn't connect the service road to the sidewalk.
mshahaba (2021-03-31 06:53:02+00:00): Hi, Thank you for reviewing my edits. It is an honest mistake from my end,i have made the changes in this changeset (#102030764). I will be extra cautious going forward, Happy to learn from you! 
Regards, 
mshahaba
DDROMAGNY (2021-03-30 08:23:40+00:00): Peut-on apporter une info si la plage est sous surveillance en été ? 
"supervised=seasonal" ou "supervised=summer" ou "supervised=horaires et mois de surveillance"
--> Plage de la Digue : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303968639#map=15/43.5388/-1.5161 
#CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101959645
hatul (2024-10-30 11:03:58+00:00): שביל סביוני הכרמל הוא שביל רשמי של עיריית חיפה? סימנת operator=Municipality of Haifa.
אני לא מוצא עליו בכלל מידע.
WadisTrail (2025-05-23 14:40:32+00:00): לצערי כן, עיריית חיפה יצרה דרך חיץ אש לא מאוד אפקטיבית אבל משמשת גם בקו ביוב. מוזמן ליצור איתנו קשר באופן ישיר, כי את ההודעות כאן לא בטוח שנראה.

עמית באום
עמותת ירוק בלב
yarokbalevngo@gmail.com
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-24 14:40:37+00:00): עמית, צריך לארגן את צורת העבודה שלכם כך שתראו הודעות על השינויים. זאת הדרך העיקרית בה אנשים מ-OSM מעירים על דברים. וזאת דרך יותר פומבית ומתועדת ממייל.
hatul (2025-05-28 08:39:15+00:00): שלום עמית, אם זו דרך אש אז אני מבין שאין לה שם. מאיפה מגיע השם?
WadisTrail (2025-05-30 11:35:45+00:00): סביוני הכרמל הוא פשוט שם השכונה שהוא מחבר בין קצוותיו, כנראה השכונה הקטנה בחיפה. השם לא מתוחכם, ואני אפילו לא בטוח אם אנחנו הגדרנו אותו ב-OSM.
hatul (2025-05-30 11:42:49+00:00): השביל לא צריך יחס. אם זו סתם דרך אין מה להוסיף לה יחס ושם.
WadisTrail (2025-05-30 11:58:50+00:00): צריך יחס ושם כי היא מסומנת ומטיילים בה המון. השם צריך להופיע גם בכל המפות הדיגיטליות ששואבות מידע מ-OSM, כמו למשל מפת הטיולים הפתוחה שאותה יש הרבה שגם מדפיסים.
באתר שלנו תוכלו לראות שזה פרויקט רציני מאוד, אנחנו מסמנים בשטח וממפים כאן בהתאם.

https://YarokBalev.org
hatul (2025-05-31 20:38:59+00:00): איך היא מסומנת? ביחס ובדרך לא מוגדר סימון. לכן ממילא לא יופיע במפה שום סימון.