piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DD1GJ (2017-04-06 21:57:20+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 (vermutlich am Wochenende) verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
eggie (2017-04-08 08:14:43+00:00): Beter laat dan nooit..
Je welkomstbericht. In het begin volgen we startende mappers in hun edits. Ook om te helpen.
Je kunt reageren in de changeset. De vragenstellen krijgt dan bericht. 

 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-08 08:16:57+00:00): footway=sidewalk hoort niet op een footway. dat zou betekenen dat aan weerszijden van het wandelpad nog trottoirs zijn. Het is een 'bug' in editor iD. Die tag dus steeds verwijderen svp.
eggie (2017-04-08 08:20:45+00:00): Een highway=path heeft geen tracktype grade5  Dat hoort bij een highway=track dat nauwelijks zichtbaar is.
Wanneer motorvoertuigen hier kunnen rijden moet het dus track zijn.
Zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen#Wegen
mavl (2017-04-15 08:11:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
calfarome (2017-04-08 01:06:45+00:00): Hello achim_k , 
I could know how it is possible to delete important points of interest in three different places of europra in a  changeset ?. If that was an involuntary mistake, please proceed to revert.
achim_k (2017-04-08 07:47:05+00:00): I realized that I deleted them earlier on my smartphone but did not upload these changes! Sorry!
calfarome (2017-04-10 14:49:44+00:00): I've reverted  the  changeset to restore POIs here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47625931#map=4/45.95/-3.47
achim_k (2017-04-10 22:02:14+00:00): I was there a few days ago, empty rooms with armed windows, no bank, no cash machine any more
calfarome (2017-04-10 23:29:14+00:00): Continues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47625931
tyr_asd (2017-04-09 11:25:12+00:00): Hi. 2 Fragen:

1) Wieso hast du denn die Fußwege am Campus (z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289547977) von "pedestrian" auf "service" umgetaggt? Ich finde das alte Tag war irgendwie passender…

2) Was verbirgt sich denn hinter "HiRes aerial imagery"?
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Constable (2017-04-07 10:26:08+00:00): Sir, are you sure this place is correctly tagged? I mean, if it sells pizza I'd tag it as restaurant + cuisine pizza + takeaway=only (if no tables are available).
Thanks for your help.
Cheers
wiibaker (2017-04-07 10:34:55+00:00): Correct. Perhaps the restaurant + pizza + takeaway would be more proper. You can eat in also. Not able to modify the POI currently as on the road. Please, you can add if you wish/can.
glebius (2018-02-11 01:32:23+00:00): Hi!

Just saw your old comment: "Glebius, why on earth you saw the need to add motorcar=no to a highway=path is totally beyond me. How superfluous! I have actually hiked this treacherous path, and added sac_scale=demanding_mountain_hiking, a much more appropriate and helpful tag."

Back when I marked it this way, I approached the trail on a bicycle from the south. I turned back at a point where I could no longer ride. At that point that was a good track, driveable by a 4x4 car. However, since track belongs to Demo Forest, I've put motorcar=no. Today I have hiked it from north, connecting the point where you gave up hiking and put "fixme" and point where I gave up on riding. Ha-ha, now I understand your comment! On my way back I have lost the trail. :) Now, that I have clearly marked the point where it stops to be a highway=track, I will split it into two parts: track and path with sac_scale. The path has ribbon marks saying it is "skid trail", and some sections of the path are clearly excavated in the slope, so looks like many years ago it was driveable by forestry equipment?
stevea (2018-02-11 01:46:43+00:00): Some very nice people live there, they opened up their land to me and whispered about paths into Demo.  What I literally stumbled across, I documented.  What you found you documented!

I think it's cool we do this mapping.  We do this on public land, a public forest, actually, which is a sort of agricultural industrial zone, often changing, a bit treacherous in places and I think we both agree, difficult to tag accurately!

We both do a good job as we tag here, especially after reading your comments.  However, we likely want a "more gentle" sac_scale rating here, shall we leave off "demanding?"

I don't know if you know that "skid trails" are used in production forests like this with that nomenclature meaning a particular sort of rough right-of-way/trail.  Yes, it is 100% construction zone in the Demonstration Forest:  rough and changeable everywhere!

Happy mapping,
Steve
DaveF (2017-04-07 12:08:33+00:00): Hi ti-lo
I've notice you've changed shop=motorcycle_repair to shop=motorcycle
What source did you use to ascertain they sell motorcycles?
ti-lo (2017-04-07 13:43:08+00:00): A shop=motorcycle doesn't have to sell motorcycles. It's possible they repair, sell tyres, clothes or other stuff. To enable frontends to filter this, I'm standardizing the key. This means the "main" category is "shop", the "subcategories" motorcycle *:* (called "services"). The services existed already since 2010, but weren't easy to filter and there was a mixture of different keys in use. Let me know if I should explain that more precisely in the wiki.
DaveF (2017-04-07 20:27:39+00:00): Even if the revised tagging system is adopted (Was there any discussion?) you  haven't confirmed whether it sells motorcycles or not.
ti-lo (2017-04-07 21:37:11+00:00): I'not sure whether I get the point.
Which discussion do you mean, this one ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/service:bicycle
And do you mean I should confirm whether this shop sells motorcycles ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3179844246
(can't do that as my crystal ball is broken ;-) )
DaveF (2017-04-07 22:06:40+00:00): I'm unsure why you don't get my point.
Was it discussed on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/ ?

"can't do that as my crystal ball is broken" < this is the problem. You've edited a tag from being correct to incorrect without any knowledge.
According to you're wiki edits, the way you've tagged it implies it sells motorcycles. This is not good process.
ti-lo (2017-04-08 14:13:35+00:00): Hi Dave,
the former tagging was :
name 	Pete Robson
service 	MOT_motorcycle
shop 	motorcycle_repair
Now it is :
motorcycle:repair 	yes
name 	Pete Robson
service 	MOT_motorcycle
shop 	motorcycle

The description of shop=motorcycle
says since 15 August 2010 :
"A shop that sells motorcycles and/or related accessories, clothes, parts, repair and rental services."

The "service tag" was at this time :
repair=yes/brand/oldtimer/no/... - repairs / maintains motorcycles

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle&diff=548821&oldid=517671

So there were several possibilities to tag a shop with "repair". The same applies for rental and clothes. 

Concerning this actual shop, I didn't use motorcycle:sales=no, as I can't say whether it (meanwhile) possibly sells used bikes.

In case your problem is about the term "shop" : There are other "shops" also which don't sell (physical) goods, i.e a tattoo shop or a laundry.
We could possibly make this point more clear in the wiki.

The goal (of the "switch" to the "shop" tagging is to "standardize" the tagging of motorcycle-related shops. This should avoid misunderstandigs because of different interpretation when something is mainly "repair" or "shop". Also, frontends should get a chance to use these parameters easier (for example to filter on "motorcycle:*.*" to list the properties).
Any improvement idea is certainly welcome.
DaveF (2017-04-08 14:47:36+00:00): Hi
"as I can't say whether it (meanwhile) possibly sells used bikes." < Again, this is the problem. You've explicitly changed it from 'definitely doesn't sell bikes' to 'definitely does sell bikes' *without* any knowledge.
ti-lo (2017-04-08 15:17:30+00:00): Hi Dave, I'm not sure whether you read my answers. The description of shop=motorcycle INCLUDES REPAIR SINCE 2010 : "A shop that sells motorcycles and/or related accessories, clothes, parts, repair and rental services."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle
So this is NOT 'definitely does sell bikes' 
If a shop mainly repairs, but sells a used bike from time to time, which key would you use ? I won't tag the shop to "motorcycle:sales=no" as I can't say whether it was just sloppily tagged AND/OR if it meanwhile still applies (might be he now sells motorbikes).
DaveF (2017-04-08 15:40:46+00:00): Hi
if I were in your position I wouldn't have made the amendments due to lack of *any* knowledge to justify the changes. Your last sentence confirms why.

shop=motorcycle_repair means it doesn't sell bikes. You've now made it, at best, ambiguous.
ti-lo (2017-04-08 16:18:26+00:00): In my point of view it's just another way to express the same thing (and to enable people to tag further properties of the item).
It would be great if you'd propose how to solve this (in your point of view) "issue" instead of keeping on complaining. In the last seven years there would have been enogh opportunities to distinguish between the two possibilities, but no one took action.
In case you'd like to switch back to this (never voted on, "Status: De facto") key, feel free to do so. We'll see what the majority will map.
DaveF (2017-04-10 11:25:01+00:00): As explained previously you've change the meaning of the entity, not provided an alternative.

There is no 'issue' to solve. The entity was accurately & legitimately tagged before your amendments.
As you've no knowledge of this shop you should not have made any changes.

I'm 'complaining' because you reduced the accuracy of the OSM database.
It's disappointing you believe others should correct your errors & fill in ambiguities you've created.

I note another user has taken issue with your edits (which is even worse than this one).
I note you've been given a warning block.
ti-lo (2017-04-10 18:28:01+00:00): What do you think about that ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle_repair
ti-lo (2017-04-10 19:24:36+00:00): Would you please add your concerns to the discussion page ? (So everyone may add his/her point of view) :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle
DaveF (2017-04-10 20:38:35+00:00): What are your plans to revert your erroneous edits?

PS
"These SHOULD be proposed on the tagging group!!! Not proposed on a wiki page."
woodpeck (2017-04-12 07:15:43+00:00): The bulk of ti-lo's motorcycle adjustments have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47664678 and I recommended that a discussion is held on the tagging mailing list before changes are re-introduced.
DaveF (2017-04-12 10:12:41+00:00):  @ti-lo
I look forward discussing your proposal on the Tagging mailing list.
felipeeugenio (2018-10-07 20:35:57+00:00): Estimado
Hay una línea del tren dibujada acá, un camino que va por un lado que definitivamente no és. de dónde salió esta información?
felipeeugenio (2018-10-07 22:11:50+00:00): acabamos de verificar que si hay una linea del tren. Vamos a mejorar su trazado. Tienes más datos sobre esto?
saludos
EivindWAA (2017-04-18 12:19:33+00:00): Hi Becca  if island/islets are taged whit source Kartverket, and username has _import please do not aligned the island/islet by bing maps, as the island probably are imported from official data deliverd from map authorities here in Norway. bing has many miss aligned images here :( have a look here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps#Precision

and if you want to help improve the map in norway please read the wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway

and

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/N50_import_(Norway)

regards
Eivind
muramototomoya (2017-04-09 00:21:38+00:00): こんにちは。この編集では王子駅周辺の道路、建物、店舗等を多数削除されておりますが、削除すると判断された情報源を教えていただけませんでしょうか。よろしくお願いいたします。
nissyyu (2017-05-14 08:55:02+00:00): こんにちは

他の編集者から、あなたの作業が大量のデータを削除しているとの報告がありました。

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2017-May/009726.html

内容を確認したところ、確かに大量のデータが削除されているようです。
こうした編集はOSMデータに対する破壊行為とみなされます。
OpenStreetMapのデータは、世界中の人々によって利用されています。
誤ったデータの投入や、存在する地物の削除を行うことは避けてください。

削除されたデータについては、下記の変更セットでデータの復元を実施しました

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48667528#map=16/35.7538/139.7341

また、もしOpenStreetMapを使ってなにか実施したいことがありましたらお話を伺いたく、コメントをいただけますと幸いです。

よろしくお願いします。
ceyockey (2017-04-07 02:46:03+00:00): work focused on Scout Road, adding buildings and access ways along the road.  Additional work related to addition of water features.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:11:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mueschel (2017-04-08 11:43:12+00:00): Hi,
all these buildings have a strange key that is not used in any other place:
tipo_const=NO CONVENCIONAL
What does it mean?
Btw, this looks a lot like an import, could you point me to the discussion and documentation of it on the mailing list or wiki?

Cheers, Jan
unmaperomas (2017-05-04 15:40:48+00:00): I tell you because those attributes are that way.
This disaster happened on April 1, 2017.
In Mocoa there was very little information, the task was activated in tasking manager of OSM Colombia, https://tareas.openstreetmap.co/project/50

In two days we managed to map the necessary and the results were used by the agencies of attention of disasters https://twitter.com/fredy_rivera/status/850722005066424323

Now what interests of the discussion, the tags in the buildings.
With the aerial images we only had 2-dimensional view, there were no traces of post-disaster mapillary (only many days later)
We needed the number of floors of the constructions, and igac has that information, so it was added.
Importantly, all the buildings were digitalized with the images,
The information of the number of floors and tipo_construccion were taken from the igac. This information is used to make quantification models of material and economic losses using Geographic Information Systems.

We know there are no OSM equivalents for these tags, and that should not be a reason for them to remove or revert the changes.


We ask that you do not delete those tags, we know that there are no equivalents in OSM, if we see that they have eliminated them, surely we will eliminate all the information, and we will mount the maps in another platform.

When a humanitarian task is activated they should apply or be more lapses in the conditions.

All information is on https://t.me/osmco I just made some issues. Other people are in charge of contributing to the wiki.
And why do we use the telegram group, not the mailing list? For the speed in which we managed to coordinate the work.

Best regards, Happy Mapping.
smaprs (2017-05-11 20:15:48+00:00): Also almost all buildings have the same tags:  
"building:levels=7".
But in fact, as can be seen in images, most buildings are houses of only 1 level (some few have 2 or 3).
What happened?  
Was those same tags accidentallly copied/applied to all buildings?
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:00:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Alecs01 (2017-04-07 17:21:15+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, sei sicuro che il lanficio occupi tutta quell'area?
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
dolphinling (2017-04-09 00:52:12+00:00): Looks like there was a problem with this edit. The entire pond got marked as a dam!
unsungNovelty (2017-07-27 11:10:28+00:00): Hi dolphinling,

I added the geometry for the waterbody and merged geometry with the gnis node that was stating this was a dam. Please feel free to fix it if it is not a dam.
Also, Thanks for going through my changeset : )

Regards,
Nikhil
literan (2017-04-11 08:39:58+00:00): не надо придумывать названия скверам и паркам
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:06:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:44:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:40:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].