piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
h2g2bob (2016-05-10 23:44:27+00:00): Hi,

To be clear, the edit to the map is from observing how traffic uses the Rochford Corner junction (I'm local to the area) and observing that almost all the traffic continues to Whitehouse Road and very little continues south.

The council have classified these roads poorly compared to their actual usage. Are you suggesting I should ask the council to re-classify these roads? I doubt they have any incentive to change road classification.
Weide (2016-04-04 06:26:39+00:00): Bitte die Buslinien dabei nicht beschädigen. (sind inzwischen repariert)
Javier Gutiérrez (2016-07-04 13:25:44+00:00): Same case here for aeas:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=21.39726&lat=41.40696&zoom=18&opacity=0.68
Klumbumbus (2016-04-14 16:42:26+00:00): Hallo,
der folgende weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407538459
kann eigentlich nicht einbahnstraße sein, da man sonst theoretisch vom parkplatz nicht mehr auf legalem wege zurück käme. kannst du das bitte nochmal prüfen?
VG
seichter (2017-09-23 08:48:42+00:00): admin_level an landuse=residential ist falsch.
Es fehlt außerdem die zugehörige Grenzrelation für eine Teilgemeinde ohne Ortschaftsrat.
chillly (2016-04-03 19:54:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the details.

I see you have added lanes=1 to the tertiary road. It looks to me that there are two lanes on the road, one in each direction. In the UK, most single carriageway roads are two lanes, so we rarely bother explicitly adding the lanes tag to these roads. Understanding what is and isn't "normal" is hard for people starting out with OSM, so I thought you might like some feedback.

I hope you add more detail and enjoy sharing your local knowledge with the rest of us.
chillly (2016-04-03 19:59:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the detail.

I think your edit is interesting, but needs a small change. You have drawn the outline of the whole area of the meeting room and tagged it all as a building. You would do better to draw the outline of the real building as the building. You can draw the outline of the car park and tag that as a car park (amenity=parking).

I hope this helps.If you have questions feel free to reply.
Durko_freemap (2016-04-03 20:24:15+00:00): super vdaka, len poznamocka, building:levels=0 je nespravne vid. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:building:levels , cize minimalne 1, Durko
obrus (2016-04-03 21:33:11+00:00): diky za kazde upozornenie, som tu novy
Bogdan Chiriac (2016-04-04 16:30:02+00:00): Salut @razor74, asa e standardul sa se completeze cu Bl. in fata numarului pentru blocuri? Multumesc!
rarad74 (2016-04-04 16:33:11+00:00): Lol. Ma gandeam ca ai sa comentezi... :P
 Nu neaparat, dar in general asta a fost trendul - sa se puna si Bl. in fata. Literele A, B, C pot fi utilizate si in alte scopuri. Dar faci cum vrei. Daca vrei sterge Bl. din fata...
rarad74 (2016-04-04 16:36:00+00:00): De exemplu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/45.14883/26.81363  
sau https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/44.37933/26.11448
Bogdan Chiriac (2016-04-04 16:36:55+00:00): Ah, nu! Nu te gandi ca ma deranjat sau ceva, sunt relativ nou pe OSM si sunt inca in procesul de invatare, din acest motiv am intrebat. :)
literan (2016-04-04 13:25:30+00:00): Ну и зачем задвоили центр Швецовой? Удаляю вашу точку.
skorasaurus (2016-04-09 14:56:48+00:00): 
Hi, 

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I saw that this area that you added was missing a tag so I fixed it for you :)
chasb47 (2016-04-09 17:13:02+00:00): Thanks.  I'm new and learning
rab (2016-04-04 21:12:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6079340/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405625151/history

not a tragedy :-)
R0bst3r (2016-04-07 09:28:54+00:00): Welcher Fehler denn? Kann man helfen?
Für facebook gibt es übrigens die keys "facebook" oder besser "contact:facebook".
R0bst3r (2016-04-07 09:32:32+00:00): Hab den "Fehler" behoben, war nur eine Kleinigkeit. Einfach Nodes mergen oder manuell Merkmale kopieren in JOSM. Siehe
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38375284
user_3716049 (2016-04-08 17:34:02+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis zu Facebook und für die Behebung meines Fehlers. Hätte noch eine Frage. Hatte an der Rheydter Straße die als fehlend gemeldeten und einige weitere Haltestellen eingefügt diese wurden erst angezeigt sind jetzt aber wieder verschwunden, daselbe habe ich eben an der Holbeinstraße festgestellt. Die abgerissenen die ich entfernt hatte sind jetzt wider aufgetaucht. Hast du vielleicht eine erklärung dafür.
GinaroZ (2016-04-07 22:01:34+00:00): what?
SomeoneElse (2016-04-08 07:39:17+00:00): @Ginaroz the comment before yours looks like spam - I'll hide it.
joost schouppe (2016-11-17 16:25:08+00:00): HI Cfish, you might want to check out the discussion about your work here: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/52986/why-are-some-ways-mapped-as-road-footprints-when-this-creates-routing-problems
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ndm (2016-04-06 18:44:11+00:00): This looks wrong -- surely boundary should be "midway" between Steep Holm and Flat Holm (as it's Welsh).
Colin Smale (2016-04-06 18:55:02+00:00): The admin boundaries and the e/w boundary are derived from official sources with lat/lon coordinates. It is certainly an anomaly, but I am pretty sure it is correct.
Nakaner (2016-04-15 23:03:57+00:00): Falls es dir noch nicht bekannt ist: In NRW dürfen diverse WMS-Dienste als Datenquelle zum Mappen verwendet werden. Sie zeichnen sich durch hohe Lagegenauigkeit aus (bei den Kartenwerken mangelt es jedoch teilweise an der Aktualität) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NRW-Atlas Die wichtigsten Dienste werden dir in JOSM im Menü Hintergrundbilder sogar angeboten.
Famiras (2016-04-17 16:51:58+00:00): Danke für den Tipp, ich werde mal schauen.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
jacek_zwik (2016-04-18 19:52:27+00:00): Kolego/Koleżanko (z nicka to nie wynika), ul. Dębowa jest strefą zamieszkania, odpowiednie znaki możesz ujrzeć na GSV. Pozdrawiam
jacek_zwik (2016-04-18 20:05:07+00:00): Przy okazji - może zainteresuje Ciebie taki link
http://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/gpsr-web/gpsr/wms142417014967566471/wms1429093988318941692/katalogWMS/katalogWFS/wms1427968857966709390/katalogOpenLS/wms1429093988318941692/wms1429001113770737506/wms1449767021968157963/UsługiMWMS?f=json
Jest to spis WMS różnych powiatów. Należy wykopiować sobie link danego powiatu (niestety sporo brakuje) "http:// adres serwera powiatu" i wkleić np. do JOSM.  Świetnie to działa. Pozwala obrysowywać budynki i granice działek. Niestety nie doradzę, jak to wkleić do Poltach 2 - nie używam
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:16:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
BCNorwich (2016-04-04 13:59:00+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenstreetMap. Your addition of Plazoleta Del Arroyo is incomplete as there is only a name, no description of the feature, the database thus does not recognize it as a feature. I removed the full stop from it.

I have reverted the addition of the untagged way and the way tagged as a El Circuito. These are duplication's along the route of RPE75. Being duplication's they are of no use to the OSM database and serve only to disrupt routing software.  

Please take time to read up on OSM best practice in order that we may all have the best map in the world, thanks.
Slawek_n (2016-04-04 20:44:57+00:00): Szanowny kolego, dobrze, że zabrałeś się za uzupełnianie mapy, ale proszę abyś wstrzymał się na razie z kasowaniem elementów mapy. Obszary wskazujące miejsca zamieszkania niosą jakąś informację i ich kasowanie to chyba nadgorliwość.
Hernan (2016-04-04 00:03:34+00:00): Fue utilizada la etiqueta para referirse a un lago.
nicolas17 (2016-04-04 00:47:34+00:00): Please describe what you actually changed in the changeset comment, as discussed in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.openstreetmap/74376
R0bst3r (2016-04-07 20:21:39+00:00): Changeset reverted.
ajithkarunaratne (2016-04-04 02:53:42+00:00): Dear Dhanitha,

Please join Sri Lankan OSM editor's forums. There you can meet like minded people and share your knowledge and vice-versa. Thanks.

http://lkosm.freeforums.net/

Ajith Karunaratne




http://lkosm.freeforums.net/
CloCkWeRX (2016-10-16 03:06:21+00:00): Hi! I notice you've added a lot of notes for the bikeway; probably something more suited to a bike routing engine - are they in there for a specific purpose?
samsavvas (2016-10-16 04:37:09+00:00): Hi, I'm afraid that this was an unsuccessful (or at least an uncompleted) experiment on my part to see if OSM could be used to develop a guide to the Outer Harbour Greenway. I'm very happy to remove these notes but I can't figure out how - any guidance would be appreciated. I have no real idea what a 'bikeway routing engine' is - if you think it might be more useful to me that OSM, can you direct me to one? Thanks, Sam.
CloCkWeRX (2016-10-16 21:14:01+00:00): No probs, I can clean these up. A good end user routing engine would be something like Strava's route builder - lets you generate a course with elevation, based on popularity. Others: RideWithGPS, mapmyride, runkeeper, etc, though they dont use open data under the hood.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routing covers the developer tools avail - OpenTripPlanner for example is used by Adelaide Metro, OSRM is also mentioned a lot. I think mapbox also provides some good APIs
samsavvas (2016-10-16 22:26:15+00:00): Thanks a lot for these suggestions - I’ll follow them up and get back to this project. The PortBUG (of which I’m secretary) has had a long interest in providing maps and directions to using this Greenway for naive or younger users, principally because the Gov’t seems reluctant to do so. 

Again, many thanks,

Sam P.

Sam Powrie
Secretary, 
Port Adelaide Bicycle User Group.
kcwu (2016-04-24 08:31:08+00:00): - 登出口不應該標成 natural=peak
- 也建議不要標「取右上」「不明分岔」, 一方面其他人的目的地可能跟你不同, 另一方面「右上」這種相對方向標在地圖上容易令人困惑
kcwu (2016-04-24 08:56:30+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4096553276
不建議標「松針地毯」, 尤其是標成 natural=tree, 並沒有一棵樹或一種樹叫作「松針地毯」
Nakaner-repair (2016-09-10 19:47:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42064297 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed low-quality import, http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=607998#p607998
duxxa (2016-04-04 15:44:07+00:00): Warum haben sie die Grasflächen in diesem Gebiet und auch in anderen Bereichen in Grödig und Sankt Leonhard entfernt/gelöscht? Leider hat keiner der Änderungssatz ein Kommentar, daher ist  ihre Vorgehensweise in keinster Weise nachvollziebar. Ich bitte diesbezüglich um eine Stellungnahme ihrerseits. mfg duxxa
Leon K (2016-06-14 04:23:12+00:00): The source:maxspeed applies to the ways but putting it on every node is overkill.
samuelrussell (2016-06-14 21:13:11+00:00): I agree, I firmly remember discovering my error after upload and chasing down nodes with source:maxspeed applied to them to correct.
aharvey (2017-04-06 12:01:15+00:00): You've also added maxspeed=40 to pedestrian footways which have no maxspeed signs from ground survey. I've fixed up one of them.
Warin61 (2018-08-08 23:07:55+00:00): Done the southern part ... ~100 nodes with source:maxspeed .. but no maxspeed. 

I did a search ..so that should be all the nodes done for this area.
aharvey (2017-09-04 01:54:24+00:00): It seems this changeset added a lot of maxspeed to nodes, which seems redundant when on the way. It makes editing later a lot harder too.
samuelrussell (2017-09-04 05:57:15+00:00): Thanks for alerting me to my error. I have an offline editor at home and can correct this for nodes.
*Martin* (2016-04-08 21:20:02+00:00): Ahoj. Ku highway=track je este dobre davat tracktype podla http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:tracktype. Dakujem.
nammala (2016-04-04 07:00:31+00:00): Hi paulkenneth,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your buildings look great but some of the buildings are overlapping. Make sure buildings should not overlap.
Happy Mapping.

cheers,
Krishna
nammala (2016-04-04 06:52:36+00:00): Hi Leald,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your buildings look great but some of the buildings are overlapping. so please go through and make changes.
Happy mapping.

cheers,
krishna
leald (2016-04-04 07:08:02+00:00): Got it.
nammala (2016-04-04 07:11:32+00:00): Thank you :)
fkv (2016-11-16 16:31:50+00:00): Bist du sicher, dass da jeder mit dem Auto reinfahren darf?
highflyer74 (2016-05-20 16:14:49+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

Is there any aim to adapt the OSM tagging scheme for this large import?

All the best,

highflyer74
Nakaner-repair (2016-09-10 23:05:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42066363 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed low-quality import, http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=607998#p607998
eggie (2018-07-04 07:53:10+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
wambacher (2016-04-04 13:55:53+00:00): please never ever remove name=* from any boundary. the local (pl) name is better than none.
literan (2016-04-04 13:30:21+00:00): Why did You dubbed airport node? Reverting.
literan (2016-04-04 13:31:13+00:00): Look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2855902
mihaii_telenav (2016-04-04 13:35:30+00:00): Hi! 
I'm trying to generate searchable items from OSM data, but I could not generate them from relations, that's why I added a separate node with that info.
Thanks!
literan (2016-04-04 14:13:18+00:00): Do not map for renderer - one of the main rules of OSM!!
nammala (2016-04-04 07:31:02+00:00): Hi krichicabacaba,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your buildings look great but some of them are overlapping . Make sure to correct them.
Happy Mapping.

Cheers,
Krishna
Jojo4u (2016-04-16 10:25:20+00:00): Hello mihaii, the airport is already mapped as area. I deleted your node.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3925268
simon04 (2016-05-30 20:27:17+00:00): Kannst du bitte die Frage bezüglich einer Schranke von https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/575059 beantworten?
user_242798 (2016-06-03 08:45:15+00:00): Changeset 32890849 (2015-07-26):
"cycleway has been removed (not:construction), fix bicycle route 91-97".

Confirmed in survey 29/11/2015 as can be seen in Mapillary pictures:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/dGYkdx1fraaGhUMQRRkY0g

Has this cycleway (id=407656187) been restored? How? By tunnel=building_passage?
Has cycleroute rcn 91-97 been diverted? Or not?

What is the Source for your Changeset and cycleway?
Kevin@RouteYou (2016-06-06 11:56:46+00:00): I received a remark (date: 2016-04-04) about the connection between the Waardsedijk and the cycling path Waardsedijk-Oost. Crossing the MA Reinaldaweg was not possible and the suggested detour was under the bridge along the IJsel to junction 97. I am dubble-checking my source (a local cyclist) and do the necessary if the update was wrong, incomplete or still under construction.
fkv (2019-06-18 16:45:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71373141 where the changeset comment is: revert 38283682
HAmap (2016-04-04 16:41:52+00:00): Falscher Kommentar von mir (HAmap), muss heißen:
Präzisierung Gebäude, HVD Bayern und Kutscherhaus benannt
emergency99 (2016-04-04 13:05:33+00:00): Statt "Leerstand" im Namen (was sicher nicht stimmt) eher den Tag "shop=vacant" verwenden. Im name Tag hat nur der Name zu stehen und sonst nichts. Das Llerstand kann zusätzlich zum shop tag in eine Note. Aber nicht in den Namen. Oder verlangt das irgendwer von Ihnen so?
maraf24 (2016-04-06 18:08:22+00:00): A dlaczego te odcinki, jak zgaduje, dróg na parkingu są jako residential a nie service?
Polarbear (2016-05-23 10:33:13+00:00): Why did you add the airport as a node, although a multipolygon exists already ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2411892 ) ?
Polarbear (2016-05-24 08:50:55+00:00): Reverted in CS 39527850
MarcoR (2016-04-04 10:18:39+00:00): Hi!

The information you inserted in the node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4096987321 is already stored in the multipolygon relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5827108 ;  why did you duplicate it?
mihaii_telenav (2016-04-04 10:27:50+00:00): Hi!
I'm trying to generate searchable items from OSM data, but I could not generate them from relations, that's why I added a separate node with that info.

Thanks!
MarcoR (2016-04-04 12:37:47+00:00): Relations are searchable too: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/frI

If your application doesn't comprehend relations you should switch to another one and not replicate the same information over multiple objects.

Duplicate data is bad because it brings to inconsistencies (when only one object is updated) or takes twice the effort to be updated.

That's just my opinion ;)

Kind regards,

Marco.
mavl (2018-11-01 17:03:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
mavl (2018-11-01 17:03:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
Hjart (2016-04-04 20:06:12+00:00): Jeg har lavet noget af det her om, så det virker bedre. Bemærk specielt parkeringspladsen
trooeels (2016-04-05 06:47:39+00:00): Ja det ser da rigtignok noget bedre ud.
Hjart (2016-04-05 06:50:49+00:00): Mange begyndere (og andre mindre erfarne) forbinder adgangsveje til kanten af parkeringspladsen. Det fungerer bare ikke i forhold til automatisk navigation.
trooeels (2016-04-05 07:06:06+00:00): Ja man kan fint putte mig i kategorien begynder. Men kan godt se at det ikke fungere uden vejene så. Det er super du lige forklare det for så kan jeg jo gå unden om den fejl næste gang.
Hjart (2016-04-05 08:16:45+00:00): Jeg har arbejdet tilstrækkeligt med OSM til at kunne putte stort set alle andre i den kategori :-). 

Selvom man umiddelbart kan gå i gang med at redigere OSM, så er der også nogle ting som man skal have rigtig meget erfaring for at gennemskue.  Derfor bruger jeg en del tid på at guide mindre erfarne folk. Det glæder mig når de sætter pris på det :-)
Superadlen (2016-04-04 10:49:47+00:00): S'il vous plaît ne pas supprimer
user_5359 (2016-04-04 16:42:44+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ist das Geschäft auch Samstag und Sonntag geöffnet (Notation siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours)? Heißt das Geschäft auch wirklich ehem. Foto Anne oder ist das nur der Name des Vorgängergeschäftes (das würde dann unter old_name gehören)?
TripleMA2b (2016-04-08 18:40:18+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Wie kann man das ändern?
BCNorwich (2016-04-04 13:22:34+00:00): Hi, Welldone and welcome to OpenStreetMap, Just made the opening times fit OSM's method, added website and phone number.
SomeoneElse (2016-04-04 13:31:59+00:00): I don't think Fitzbillies is a really restaurant though is it?  It's a while since I've been there, but I'd have always categorised it as "quite an expensive cafe, catering to Cambridge's extensive tourist trade"
If you want to separate values (e.g. "cuisine" I'd suggest using semicolons rather than commas, because that's what anything consuming the data will expect - but note that most things will just ignore values that they don't understand.  If you want it to appear in listings extracting from OSM data, have a look at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/cuisine#values and pick something appropriate from there.
Cheers,
Andy
SK53 (2016-04-05 13:13:31+00:00): Certainly an expensive cafe last time I was in there even in it's new form (i.e., since the original place folded).
canfe (2019-03-25 17:25:05+00:00): Non ha un giorno di chiusura?

Corretto orari di apertura.
Consiglio di usare per editarli
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Luuuddooo (2016-05-02 23:20:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne comprends pas trop ce que vous avez voulu faire avec l'Isère: on dirait que vous avez  noyé plusieurs îles:
 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136899737

 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4716832

D'après ce qui est expliqué ici:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:waterway=riverbank
c'est seulement la relation multipolygon qui doit être waterway=riverbank, pas les ways
Tales Paiva Nogueira (2016-05-03 08:57:10+00:00): Bonjour,

  Je ne pense pas que ça c'est "noyer" des îles, vu que riverbank c'est equivalent a des berges. Effectivement, je n'avais pas vu la partie du wiki sur la relation multipolygon. Je vais effacer la tag.

Merci.
5m4u9 (2016-04-04 14:21:00+00:00): Hola, gracias por editar el mapa y mejorarlo.

No me queda claro si quieres añadir dónde vives o es el nombre de un negocio/oficina.

De pronto voy a borrarlo porque esto provoca un problema de privacidad. Mejor mencionar a una torre con la opción compartir de la derecha, y ya.

Si quieres mejorar tu barrio podemos hacerlo, pasa por el HackLab (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2710181931).
unsungNovelty (2016-04-05 07:32:27+00:00): Hi ENSG Battir, 

Can you please confirm the source and also tell if this is a documented import? Couldn't find any information online. Kindly revert.

Regards,
Nikhil
ENSG Battir (2016-04-07 07:11:46+00:00): Dear Nikhil
All my apologies for this late answer.
Data source is Battir village council topographic database that was given to our engineer school (ENSG) to be gathered, updated, corrected (with a lot work remaining) and published for worldwide use. We gonna try to fix all the numerous problems due to the atypic generation process and to comment this work.
Best regards
Hervé QUINQUENEL
ENSG
ENSG Battir (2016-04-07 10:07:20+00:00): Dear Nikhil 
I'd like to publish a document that introduce the topographic project in this area in order to explain process and background.
(it's a PDF file). How can I do that in OSM ? 
Thanks
HQ
Albertus Liberius (2016-04-04 12:32:37+00:00): don't draw exact position of inside facility
user_5359 (2016-11-06 18:32:32+00:00): Hello! Did you mean highway=pedestrian on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407699877 ?
zstadler (2016-05-09 18:29:45+00:00): Nature reserve boundaries are a sensitive issue, and we try to keep them according to the approved land plans and Nature Reserves proclamations.

Is the change in the boundary of Caesarea National Park [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395559964] based on any approved land plan (תב"ע)?

If so, can you please add its ID to the existing list in the ref tag.
If not, would you mind if I revert this change?
Athalis (2017-11-19 22:49:34+00:00): Hallo morano,

erstmal vielen Dank für die Hausnummern!

Mir ist eben aufgefallen dass du für jedes Gebäude mit einer Hausnummer den Tag von building=yes auf building=house geändert hast. War das eine bewusste Entscheidung von dir?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233917540 ist nun wirklich kein Wohnhaus.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233917505 ist denke ich eher ein building=barn.
jc86035 (2016-04-04 14:25:22+00:00): Isn't the area under the bridge part of the Mainland?
Baloo Uriza (2017-03-22 11:46:16+00:00): I'd like to bring your attention to the talk-us mailing list, which appears to have questions regarding this and similar edits in the area.  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-March/017168.html
Hjart (2016-04-04 16:24:28+00:00): På Geodatastyrelsens fotos ser det dog ud til at den ikke er mere "dead end" end at man kan passere på cykel.