piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-04-01 17:27:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
carfog81 (2021-04-05 16:09:03+00:00): Hola por favor no dañar las relaciones Multipoligono en este conjunto de cambios, daño 5 relaciones. por favor ser más cuidadoso. Usar JOSM para editar es mucho mejor, ya que al subir genera una advertencia cuando se dañan las relaciones. Por favor si no SABE, por favor no dañe!
carfog81 (2021-04-05 16:19:21+00:00): Hola por favor no dañar las relaciones Multipoligono en este conjunto de cambios, daño 1. por favor ser más cuidadoso. Usar JOSM para editar es mucho mejor, ya que al subir genera una advertencia cuando se dañan las relaciones
confusedbuffalo (2021-04-01 18:39:27+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and it seems good to me, if that route isn't used any more.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 10:30:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564475599/history has 2=permissive key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
(Inactive) hairyhaggis_kaart (2024-02-20 13:39:50+00:00): Hi! Thanks for reaching out. I think this was a rookie error from my early OSM editing days. I have updated it now.
confusedbuffalo (2021-04-01 18:38:06+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
You requested a review of this, and my only comment would have been about the address, but you've since fixed that, so all looks good to me!
MarcoR (2021-05-27 13:12:57+00:00): Ciao! Ho esteso la traccia che avevi iniziato a disegnare basandomi sui dati di Strava; il nome "TTT" mi sembra strano... è un'abbreviazione e/o è usato solo dai ciclisti? Se trovi qualche errore correggi pure senza timori ;)
eggie (2021-04-01 18:25:37+00:00): Dag blgorissen.. Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes.  Is dat hier het geval?
 Dan bijtaggen
oneway:bicycle=no

en evt
ook voor moped en mofa..
MVG
eggie
confusedbuffalo (2021-04-01 18:38:26+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and it all looks good to me. It would be good to add the postcode too, if you know it.
BCNorwich (2021-04-02 10:42:13+00:00): Hi, my point would be that the tag building=terrace should logically refer to a row of houses. These individual houses, (in a terrace), ought to be tagged building=house. The tag house=terraced could also be added to indicate the house type. I think this method is best/easiest.

Please see here for more info:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace
 and here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:house%3Dterraced

Regards Bernard.
kartonage (2021-04-01 19:02:21+00:00): Hej Mahmood_abdul,

welcome to OpenStreetMap. 
You have deleted a lot of ways here that are visible on aerial imagery. Please respect the work of other users.

This changeset has been reverted due to vandalism.

Best regards
Mahmood_abdul (2021-04-01 23:16:34+00:00): @kartonage       
This is not vandalism.              
If you saw the aerial imagery you will see how narrow these "ways" is. they are labeled as service and others which is absolutely wrong. these are foot path not "roads" cars can't drive on them.       
If you see the history of this location it was filled with over 3000 spam point that was added by maps.me users. this is a grave yard. and also by these "roads" its easy for users to add thousands of spam! these "ways" are not important unlike the need to stop the mass spam points edits here.       
there was also spam points that you reverted but didn't delete after the revert if you wanted the "ways" to stay..        
I really hoped if you just disgusts the changes before revert to comply with the OSM guidelines. 
 Anyway. I revert your Changeset and hope you understand.       
Thank you.
kartonage (2021-04-02 07:53:44+00:00): I can undestand that you want to clean-up nodes that have been added with false categories or as private bookmarks. But neither are highways spam points nor are they not existing here. If you delete them now, someone will add them later anyway. Because they exist, regardless how narrow they are. Deletion is not an option and deleting the whole highways system is just plain vandalism.
You can choose to improve the actual  classification or type of the highways. That is how you should go about here.
user_11418917 (2021-04-02 09:17:49+00:00): @kartonage       
There was over 3000 spam points (more like 5000) with personal names that was added as "monument, tourist attraction, shops, etc" here in this grave yard. the ones who behind this uses maps.me to add these spam points. they don't have the aerial imagery option on maps.me so they go by these "roads" which is definitely not a roads you can drive on! the width of these ways is less than the width of a small car, so definitely no cars can drive here. I'm local and I've been there. this is the only way I found to stop the mass spam edits on this location.        
I decided to wait for few maps.me updates so there is no way for those people to know where to add their spam. few updates without those ways will make it cleaner and will prevent those additions. And after few maps.me update when we dont see new spam points added, I will add the ways in their correct tag as a foot path and will draw them from zero, because the ways that was added most of them are just wrong and it's like half of the real ways.                           
if you want these to be fixed, wait a few, and I will promise you I will add and fix all of those. if you can't wait you can fix all of this roads and add the missing ones and keep monitoring the area for new spam points by yourself.               
Thank you
Mahmood_abdul (2021-04-02 09:24:00+00:00): @lockdownguy Thank you my dear friend.
kartonage (2021-04-02 09:30:40+00:00): Deleting the roads will not stop the use of maps.me at this location. All you did was delete valid objects that need improvements. There are lots of visible roads here. I can see cars on the aerial imagery. You also deleted those bigger roads. Especially using a second account just for the deletion seems nefarious. As you have been editing for a bit you should know that there are quiet a few tagging options to improve this cemetary. You can always improve existing ways but deleting ways just to redraw them later (maybe if you feel like it) is not the way. 
Also waiting for some other third party app to update so you can start improving seems wasteful since you could just start improving now so it may update accordingly next time. Either way, maps.me users will do what that want to do, if the roads are mapped here or not.

Since it seems like you would willingly just delete valid objects over and over I have made a report with the Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-02 16:13:01+00:00): @Mahmood_abdul
Hello, Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  Please don't delete things that actually exist.  If something is mistagged, please tag it correctly.
Please also do not label changes as "Spam" or "Vandalism" when they are not.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-02 16:50:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102205336 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some delete-everything edits in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102141505
pio2_122 (2021-04-01 18:59:09+00:00): Wandalizm wycofany.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102142231
mariotomo (2021-11-02 16:24:35+00:00): hola. si quieres ayuda para mejorar tu estilo, por favor busca contacto con la comunidad local o global. aquí pusiste una nueva área residencial dentro de otra ya existente.
mariotomo (2021-11-02 16:35:49+00:00): (el nombre "Las Marías" ya estaba asociado a un nodo, y ahora tenemos dos elementos que se refieren a la misma cosa.) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
mariotomo (2021-11-02 16:36:35+00:00): Ejemplos de malas situaciones
Un objeto área con un objeto puntual dentro, ambos con las mismas etiquetas representando la misma característica del mundo real.
hauke-stieler (2021-04-01 17:46:04+00:00): Zusätzliche Quelle: note/2603563
confusedbuffalo (2021-04-01 18:34:36+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and it all looks good to me.
confusedbuffalo (2021-04-01 18:33:50+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.
My only comment is that it would be helpful if your changeset description was a bit clearer as to what you've corrected.
Scalarik (2021-05-26 15:24:42+00:00): Hey. In Helsinki area it seems to be customary to use highway=path for trails in the woods and highway=footway is used for sidewalks and such. I've changed some of your paths to follow this custom :)
pfl (2021-06-06 21:11:53+00:00): Yes, so it seems. Thanks for fixing!
4004 (2021-04-05 00:29:16+00:00): не имеет смысла - номер находится при поиске адрес, и на другиз зумах
ToniE (2021-04-01 19:08:59+00:00): Hallo Sebastian,

ist das wirklich eine Schranke oder nicht doch ein Grünes Schild, dass einen Notfallrettungspunkt markiert?

Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2618570663

Gruß
Toni
Sebastian Schmidt (2021-04-01 19:22:09+00:00): Servus Toni,

danke für den Hinweis, ich habe den falschen Punkt angeklickt.
Die Schranke ist da, der Punkt aber auch.

Grüße
Sebastian
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 23:52:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108549522 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some allegedly google-source changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105322114
Dimitar155 (2021-04-03 14:20:21+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM, Mangini

It looks like you are adding building addresses but this is not the proper way. Currently you are adding tourism apartments (i.e. apartments that can be rented to tourists) which is not right. For a proper example you can check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224329415
If you have any questions, let me know.

Cheers, Dimitar
ma-rt-in (2021-09-28 16:32:16+00:00): Hallo,

schau mal dir diese Note an: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2869098

vg
OSMDoudou (2021-04-02 10:01:58+00:00): Hello,

This is a massive changeset in one go and spread over a large geographical space. It's good practice to keep changesets smaller, so they're easier to review and correct.

For example, Passage du Centre in Mons is disused and physically inaccessible, so there no KFC, Guess, Nespresso, Channel, etc. shops there.

Would you please explain what source of information was used for this changeset ?

Thank you.
OSMDoudou (2021-04-02 10:02:40+00:00): Link to the concerned place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8583885770#map=19/50.45109/3.94837
Tom Desoutter (2021-04-12 11:25:19+00:00): heyy, 
it was an error or fake over Google maps I think want I'm going to check today on maps and the shop are disapparead.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-04-01 21:38:14+00:00): thanks for correction!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102144518
SekeRob (2021-04-02 19:15:48+00:00): Hi

There was also an alert on the population we size. I checken your number of 201k is correct per 2019. OSM thinks its 204420 but that's a 2017 number. 
Cheers, e di niente. 😁
alessandrocarmeli (2021-04-02 20:40:58+00:00): I was looking the Istat souce with the population at 1/1/2021
joost schouppe (2021-06-14 15:56:20+00:00): Hi Jenstin,
I'm confused by this road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553056746
General access is for destination only, and pedestrians can just enter. But then all other modes are forbidden. So who really gets destination? Also, I see no traffic signs on Mapillary here
Jenstin (2021-06-14 16:04:26+00:00): Ik werd er een tijdje geleden met een gps-file langs gestuurd, maar op een honderd-tal meter van de straat (Lipselaan) staat er een hek met daarop iets in de aard van "privé terrein". Het hek is ook op StreetView niet te zien, maar is er wel. Je kan er dus niet door, maar de weg dient dus ook voor weinig.

Ik was niet helemaal zeker hoe dat dan aan te geven.
joost schouppe (2021-06-14 16:29:33+00:00): Ha, ik begrijp het. Op zich wil je dus vooral meegeven: "je kan er wel in, maar er valt niet veel te beleven". Op zich maakt die access=private verderop dat al wel duidelijk, dus ik zou daar eigenlijk gewoon niets extra voor toevoegen.
DUGA (2021-05-27 23:30:46+00:00): The buildings you added have horrible GPS offsets.

I'm not sure if you are local here or not. Please consider fixing all these junks by taking a look at the background MD 6 inch imagery. Do not use Bing, it is a troublemaker.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102144648#map=19/39.66589/-78.93138
marczoutendijk (2021-04-01 19:10:04+00:00): Why are you disabling U-turns?
Where are you disabling U-turns?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
joost schouppe (2021-06-14 15:45:47+00:00): Hi Jenstin,
The forest guard here tells is this path is illegal. I'll add access=no for now. Was it a clear path? Was there any signage up?
Also, where did you get the "Long Shot" name from?
Jenstin (2021-06-14 15:58:52+00:00): Die naam had ik ergens online zien staan, het zei meer dan de Strava segmenten die er lopen.
In heel het bos is het vaak niet echt duidelijk of paden al dan niet toegankelijk zijn. Aan de ene ingang staat soms wel een bord en aan de andere ingang niet.
eggie (2021-04-01 20:40:44+00:00): Beste EtienneJov  Door je actie is fietsknooproute 91-97 onderbroken.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-01 20:54:36+00:00): Eenrichtingsverkeer zou zomaar kunnen. 
De fietsroute heb ik nu via secundaire Langstraat omgeleid zodat het weer naar behoren routeert.
Een fietsroute kan nooit tegen de eenrichting ingaan. Dat routeert niet. 
MVG
eggie
EtienneJov (2021-04-02 06:16:22+00:00): Hoi eggie, daar had ik even niet op gelet, goed dat je dit aangeeft. Ik neem aan dat de fietsroute via de parallelweg gaat, maar ik kan het bordje niet goed lezen op streetview. Ik ga vanmiddag even langs om te kijken hoe het echt zit.
Groeten,
EtienneJov
eggie (2021-04-02 06:25:41+00:00): Hoi.. Goed idee..Ik denk dat de situatie later is veranderd en dat je inderdaad gelijk hebt.
Het was ooit een tweerichting fietspad.. maar nu wellicht niet meer.
Op straatkijk zie ik verschillende foto s. Volgens de laatste is het eenrichting.
Laat je bevindingen maar weten.. Met editor iD kun je geen fietsroutes aanpassen. Dus wel handig om te kijken hoe de fietsroute is aangegeven.
Mvg
Eggie
EtienneJov (2021-04-02 15:33:08+00:00): Hoi Eggie, het blijkt dat de bewegwijzering in conflict is: het fietsroutenetwerkbordje voor het kruisen van de Huigensstraat zegt 'oversteken' (met een links-rechts-pijl), maar het fietspad is ook expliciet eenrichting, aangegeven door een pijl bij de kruising met de Henri Dunantstraat. Ik vermoed dat men bij het fietsroutenetwerk vergeten is dit bordje aan te passen aan de nieuwe situatie. Hoe zouden we dit oplossen? Groeten, Stefan
eggie (2021-04-02 15:39:03+00:00): Dag Stefan.

De route maar even zo laten als 'm heb gelegd. Dan klopt in ieder geval de routering. 
Het 'verkeerde' bordje zal wel ergens te melden zijn.. wat overigens geen garantie geeft dat het ooit wordt aangepast.
Zal even zoeken waar je zoiets kan melden.

Groet..
Eggie
eggie (2021-04-02 15:45:42+00:00): Zie hier https://www.meldpuntroutes.nl/#/fietsen
Doe je het zelf.. Ben benieuwd.

Gr eggie
EtienneJov (2021-04-02 15:56:43+00:00): Gedaan!
Jakka (2021-04-02 06:26:45+00:00): Ai het is niet omdat iets afgesloten is, dat het er niet meer aanwezig moet zijn op kaart ...... Access=no belet de toegang.....
frits_devos (2021-04-02 09:50:01+00:00): Dank u. Is het ook zo als hij definitief verdwijnt?
Jakka (2021-04-02 10:46:23+00:00): Correct. Als er niets meer van te bespeuren valt, opbreken en inzaaien. Dan is deze definitief weg en vervangen door iets anders.
Ongebruikte wegen zijn nog steeds een herkenningpunten
Jakka (2021-04-02 10:51:31+00:00): heb de weg terug kunnen opvissen en aangepast.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4314523
simon04 (2021-04-15 21:01:18+00:00): Danke! :-)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-03-31 10:18:38+00:00): If a lane is not physically separate it should not be a separate way.
Stretch Longfellow (2025-03-31 13:00:08+00:00): Can you be more specific as to where the concern is? This is a four year old edit and my memory isn't that good! I don't disagree with your statement in general, but I also can't verify this situation without knowing where you are referring to.
Tomas_J (2023-07-11 08:07:31+00:00): Ahoj, pre osobu, ktoru socha/doska zobrazuje alepo popisuje pouzivaj sekundarne odkazy - viz.:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:wikipedia
Владимир К (2021-09-27 08:41:20+00:00): добрый день! 
думется мне, что шоссе здесь не нужно, тем более что на остальных участках название без шоссе
Andrei Lazarev (2021-09-27 08:46:17+00:00): спасибо, исправил
DP24PH (2021-04-02 12:45:41+00:00): Notice to ADT:

Cavite-Laguna Expressway Silang segment (from Tibig-Kaong Interchange to Santa Rosa Interchange) may, at any time, be completely constructed, according to multiple sources. Kindly restore the normal settings (with access=no) as possible in order to be ready for a possible opening. A lot of local OSM editors have prepared the mapping for the Q3 opening.
beep_boop (2021-04-02 22:41:22+00:00): Hi DP24PH, 
Thank you for reaching out and providing the additional details for this location. I was following the OSM Wiki's guidance for highway construction (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction), because this stretch of highway appears to be "currently under construction and impassable by the traffic it is intended for.” I used both the highway=construction and construction=motorway tags to help make it clear what the correct classification will be once this does open. I try to always map to the current status of the highway and thought this would be the most accurate tagging. With this OSM policy in mind, please let me know what you think. Thanks!
SomeoneElse (2023-03-25 00:22:00+00:00): Is the tagging for this Ogham stone OK?  It's currently
historic=The_Long_Stone
name=Ogham Stone
which seems unlikely to be correct?
It'd be nice if it could appear like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#25/51.76409/-10.12187 , but for that to happen it needs some tags that say "this is an Ogham Stone".
Cheers,
Andy
b-unicycling (2023-03-26 11:17:59+00:00): Fixed it. I don't know how that could have happened.
eggie (2021-04-01 21:06:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Badojo (2021-04-02 08:53:02+00:00): I ovo isto, ima ih po cijelom Novom Sadu, čak i u Karlovcima
Badojo (2021-04-02 08:53:18+00:00): Baš počne ići na živce
Duja (2021-04-02 10:25:37+00:00): Ma znam, neko je bio "vredan" kad ih je unosio, ali mi se sad ne gubi vreme na brisanje svega toga... jednom kad budem baš raspoložen (kao što bio sinoć ovde). Mislim da to ničemu ne smeta, nego samo pravi šum. A "favorit" su mi is_in tagovi...
phidauex (2021-04-02 18:50:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for your additions, I love these little neighborhood footways. As a tip, please connect the footway to the road on either end, rather than letting it "float", that lets pedestrian routers use the footway to suggest walking and connect to the sidewalks. Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102148458
eggie (2021-04-01 21:09:24+00:00): In deze changeset heb je hoogspanningskabeld getrokken over de Europaweg.
Waarschijnlijk door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Ik kijk even of het simpel te herstellen is.
Je edits..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102148489

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-01 21:14:40+00:00): De hoogspanningskabel heb ik weer teruggelegd.
Het verkeer kan weer veilig over de Europaweg.
MVG
eggie
blackboxlogic (2021-04-06 19:25:47+00:00): Thanks for merging nodes with the areas that they represent. I see you setting water=reservoir because that's what GNIS imported. You should know that GNIS labeled pretty much anything that was wet a "reservoir" and you might want to look at the definitions and choose 'pond' or 'lake' in many of these cases.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102148557
OldManCelli (2021-04-06 21:06:14+00:00): Yes, I had a discussion on slack about this and it was agreed that it was a judgment call between the two (reservoir and lake) since it was a lake that was significantly changed in size when they added the dam. This was precisely the issue I flagged because I wasn't sure. I should probably change it back to a lake since lake is the more precise term. I will change it back since the GNIS labeled everything as a reservoir. Thanks for pinging me about it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102148557
blackboxlogic (2021-04-06 22:56:46+00:00): Oh! Didn't realize that was you on slack. I appreciate that you took the time to get other opinions. Happy mapping.
eggie (2021-04-01 21:19:08+00:00): Beste LB

Hoe kan  nu een toegangsweg vastzitten op deze plek aan een weg die er boven langs loopt? Dit kan eenvoudig niet kloppen.
De voorgaande mapper is zeer ervaren ... 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-01 21:23:18+00:00): Reverted by changeset  Wijzigingenset #102149256

Aklle begin is moeilijk/ 
Het kan onmogelijk goed zijn. Auto's kunnen niet een verdieping hoger springen.
Je edits zijn teruggezet.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.

MVG
eggie
dino_h (2021-04-13 20:43:32+00:00): The powerline you changed does not run through Kozármisleny any more
elsy1 (2021-04-14 15:53:40+00:00): این منطقه مابین دو کوه جاده هراز  چه منطقه جنگلی دارد که لندیوز جنگلی ثبت کردید براش؟
elsy1 (2021-04-14 15:59:18+00:00): ریورت شد  لطفا تکرار نشه
user_5359 (2021-04-02 05:50:06+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning(!) of the keys.
See https://www.osm.org/way/924951895, 
https://www.osm.org/way/924951896,
https://www.osm.org/way/924951897
There no other OSM keys on this ways.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-16 14:14:01+00:00): hello!

was 3; part intentional in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8584308582/history ?
rene78 (2023-12-16 14:53:25+00:00): Hi Mateusz,

No, typo. Thanks for fixing!

Rene
jleedev (2021-04-01 23:29:29+00:00): This area definitely includes three large apartment buildings (Cork Factory, The Yards at 3 Crossings, The Pennsylvanian), which might be good to detour around. I'd also stick to Liberty Ave and stay off of the busway/railway corridor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102149599
colgza (2021-04-02 00:04:22+00:00): I don't know how to draw borders for `landuse=*`. Perhaps I should stop.
colgza (2021-04-02 13:27:28+00:00): Please fix this for me.
jleedev (2021-04-02 14:03:53+00:00): Sure thing.
GinaroZ (2021-04-02 10:15:48+00:00): This change has been reverted. Please check the Bing imagery which clearly shows the road has been rebuilt with a curve.
LySioS (2021-07-07 18:28:19+00:00): Bonjour Hoancat,

J'ai lu dans un document de la mairie (https://www.ville-cabestany.fr/application/files/4215/5845/2633/LIVRE_1977_2017.pdf, p.77)
qu'ils appelaient ce quartier Les Coteaux Saint-Thomas. On le passe en name ou official_name ?
hoancat (2021-07-07 21:38:25+00:00): Bonjour LySioS,

Les Coteaux Saint-Thomas sont situés vers la Rue Lucie et Raymond Aubrac. Les maisons de cette rue ont été construites vers 2016, comme indiqué sur le livre.
On le voit d'ailleurs sur le cadastre indiqué comme « SANT TOMAS ».
Tu peux créer un noeud voisinage vers cet endroit, ça me paraît plus approprié.
Le livre est intéressant, je l'avais déjà lu et ajouté des informations qui étaient manquantes (groupe de modifications 105911045). J'ai sûrement laissé passer d'autres informations.

Bonne lecture,
Hoancat