piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
karlchick (2022-06-28 19:16:12+00:00): Hi Nick, mostly I really don't like unclassified roads used for roads in built up areas that are not clear  through ways, but more like residential/service roads. I am used to using OS maps for many decades, but newish to OSM...  it seems odd that OSM don't have a class of highway lower than unclassified, (which on OS maps are usually 60mph  single lane roads without A or B route numbers), they only seem to have residential or service as a lower classification...
trigpoint (2022-06-30 15:16:52+00:00): >  it seems odd that OSM don't have a 
> class of highway lower than 
> unclassified, (which on OS maps are 
> usually 60mph single lane roads 
> without A or B route numbers), 
Your comments seem to be missing tertiary, which is how most two lane roads with a 60mph limit are mapped. These are also what we in the UK call these unclassified, in rural terms unclassified in OSM is used for roads which are too narrow to have lanes.
It is important not to take the names of tags too literally.
nickjohnston (2022-07-07 15:44:03+00:00): Hi Karl,

Thanks for the explanation. Ordnance Survey and OpenStreetMap naturally have their own different conventions and styles. With OpenStreetMap being a global project, it tries to adopt schemes that work globally (sometimes with a few local changes).

For the sake of consistency as well as routing, I think it makes sense to follow the established conventions.

I understand your desire for more road classifications, but highway=service on these roads isn't the answer. I'm planning on reverting your change to restore consistency to the roads in town. I'm happy to discuss particular roads if you like.

Thanks,
Nick
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
DUGA (2022-04-18 22:17:51+00:00): ERRATA: Note 3116247
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 22:40:42+00:00): It is not proposed anymore, it is now open and constructed, Now Connects to Victoria Square
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 22:41:05+00:00): There are houses down here now
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ivanbranco (2022-04-19 16:31:37+00:00): Hi CHAINDER19,

I asked you two months ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117588924) and 16 days ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119253427) what's the reason why you delete and redraw building instead of just editing the existent ones. For example, you deleted way/535516504 and created way/1052846958.

Acting this way you're deleting a lot of "history" in this area, please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

-------------

Здравствуйте, CHAINDER19,

Я спрашивал вас два месяца назад (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117588924) и 16 дней назад (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119253427), по какой причине вы удаляете и перерисовываете здания вместо того, чтобы просто редактировать существующие. Например, вы удалили way/535516504 и создали way/1052846958.

Действуя таким образом, вы удаляете много "истории" в этой области, пожалуйста, прочитайте: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SLMapper (2022-04-18 23:29:05+00:00): folge cleanup: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119881375
nevw (2022-04-19 00:37:19+00:00): Hi
name of medical facility is misspelt
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SLMapper (2022-04-18 23:47:54+00:00): nachfolgend: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119881648
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 23:38:03+00:00): Added streets and street names from new Seaton Whitevale Community
https://projects.blacklineapp.com/seaton-whitevale-siteplan/?elqTrackId=0014364581c24aea89881f571db439ab&elqaid=985&elqat=2
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 23:57:52+00:00): added streets and street names to the new Seaton Mulberry Neighbourhood
https://mattamyhomes.com/ontario/gta/pickering/seaton-mulberry
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
deskoft (2022-04-19 00:59:13+00:00): Muchas gracias por las correcciones, aveces es dificil ver bien la forma de los edificios con el mapa, inclusive yendo en persona
ovruni (2022-04-19 01:20:19+00:00): Hola, para el mapeo en Lima se sugiere utilizar las imágenes de Esri aclarada, ya que estas imágenes son las que tienen mejor claridad. Si mas adelante tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, también la puedes hacer por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad de OSM en Perú 
Saludos
deskoft (2022-04-19 02:45:36+00:00): Muchas gracias amigo, por algun motivo me sale el grupo en privado y no me puedo unir.
user_5359 (2022-04-27 12:41:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963634167 (one of three). What is the meaning of the tag building:le=6?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-04-27 13:15:12+00:00): A typo: I corrected it to `building:levels` as they should be
Trevor_1 (2022-04-19 01:27:14+00:00): Why did you change this to Trunk? Have we discussed this in Slack yet?
Trevor_1 (2022-04-19 01:29:09+00:00): We have told you repeatedly to stop making largescale changes without discussing it.
txemt (2022-04-19 01:29:20+00:00): We did. You were not privy conversation, as you're not a local Louisiana editor.
Trevor_1 (2022-04-19 01:31:32+00:00): I'm in the Louisiana group, and I don't see the discussion
txemt (2022-04-19 01:35:26+00:00): It was discussed with LOCAL editors in a conversation that you're not privy to.
Trevor_1 (2022-04-19 02:32:09+00:00): It's against the guidelines to have Trunk roads parallel to motorways, especially within a short distance.
txemt (2022-04-19 02:34:35+00:00): Whose guidelines? Yours? I'm merely following what the wiki says, as well as conversation between LOCAL editors about Airline Highway.
user_2066394 (2022-05-04 09:30:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2912221
user_5359 (2022-04-21 05:08:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052869841, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052869885, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052869906.
What is the meaning of all the foreign keys?
cserpell (2022-04-19 13:51:36+00:00): Estimado, en vez de borrar el nombre, lo dejé como official_name, ya que al parecer es el nombre oficial de la plaza.
ssssssssssssssssss (2022-04-19 02:51:32+00:00): Good Mapping
AhegaHOE (2022-04-19 13:00:03+00:00): thx
TG-map4 (2022-04-19 13:17:05+00:00): unfortunately not good mapping in some parts. The whole school building was deleted. Please add it again. Furthermore, please pay attention to not use the "name" for descriptions. Only official names like "Erft-Swist-Halle" belong to the name tag, not for example "Hof am Lehrerzimmer". This should go to the description. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
TG-map4 (2022-04-19 13:17:48+00:00): and the landuse at bft fuel station is wrong
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-04-19 06:57:02+00:00): Hi po, Nestor

Ano'ng source para sa pangalan ng mga kalye? Personal nyo bang pinuntahan yung mga lugar o kinopya nyo lang mula sa ibang mapa o ibang source na di pwedeng pagkunan ng data para sa OSM?
ONS_851 (2022-04-19 16:17:55+00:00): I got the information about the roads from this website [https://support.google.com/maps/thread/92227824?hl=en].
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-04-19 19:39:04+00:00): May alam ba kayo sa lugar? Pinuntahan nyo ba? Sa totoo lang, mukhang bawal po yung ginagawa nyo.
DUGA (2022-09-09 04:00:15+00:00): Please consider spliting the changeset into smaller ones.

A changeset across severa states is usually a red flag especially the changeset comment does not have any useful information (for such a large portion of the map)
Carto'Cité (2023-08-24 12:41:50+00:00): Hello.
Please note that nodes railway=station do not have to hold the tag public_transport=station. At the note tag says on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2489176454, public_transport=station is defined on the perimeter of the railway station (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683885518). As show on the diagram https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations.
Regards,
Antoine from Carto‘Cité on behalf of SNCF
mehdi7878 (2022-04-19 03:46:30+00:00): اورژانس
tastrax (2022-04-27 04:08:08+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Kovoschiz (2022-04-19 11:02:28+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels. This is not a printed map. `name=` is for proper names only. Think of it as what is likely to be after opening. Use `description:zh=` otherwise.
Wilmer Osario (2022-04-19 11:31:12+00:00): Hola

¿De cuál fuente obtiene los nombres de las calles? 🤔
kartler175 (2022-04-20 16:46:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052897176

Une distance entre les nœuds inférieure à 1 m n'est pas appropriée pour un contour d'atterrissage. Il n'existe aucune possibilité réaliste d'atteindre cette précision avec des photos aériennes. Ce que tu cartographies n'est pas "landuse", mais le contour de certaines cimes d'arbres.
Pan (2022-04-20 17:59:20+00:00): Oui, c'est un peu du micro mapping. Très utile pour se repérer ou suivre l'historique de l'évolution du paysage. Bonne suite de journée.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:03:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
forstner-m (2022-04-20 20:05:09+00:00): Hallo Jan,
hast du mehr Informationen ob die private Landebahn aufgelassen wurden? Das Gelände wird aber ganz sicher von Modellfliegern genutzt.
Danke!
Schöne Grüße
Michael
Jan Olieslagers (2022-04-21 14:01:10+00:00): Für Modellfluggelände, siehe [url]https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dmodel_aerodrome[/url]. Es beneut mir, ob dort "richtigen" Flugzeuge (a la C172 oder Robin DR400) fliegen, das wäre ja eine andere Sache.
M.fr.Gr.,
Karel ADAMS
forstner-m (2022-04-21 19:59:48+00:00): Ich werde mich informieren, ob hier noch Flugbetrieb ist und dann stelle ich es danach ein.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-04-22 05:52:47+00:00): Gerne, ja. Wohnst du in der Nähe? Weißt du ob es dort früher Flugbetrieb gegeben hat? Wir hätten nie ein Flugplatz an dieser Stelle, scheint mir?!
Grüß!
Karel
forstner-m (2022-04-22 15:19:28+00:00): Ja, ich bin in der Nähe. Seit einige Zeit habe ich keinen Flugbetrieb mehr gesehen, aber es war früher auch nur wenig. Zur Sicherheit werde ich einfach nachfragen.
forstner-m (2022-04-25 15:00:26+00:00): Nach Rückfrage bei der zuständigen Stelle habe ich erfahren, dass der Flugbetrieb eingestellt ist. Der Platz wird jetzt als Modellflugplatz verwendet.
Wilmer Osario (2022-04-19 11:31:30+00:00): Hola

¿De cuál fuente obtiene los nombres de las calles? 🤔
nyampire (2022-04-20 06:24:13+00:00): レビューしました。
既存の道路が引っ張られて、間違った形状になっています。ドラッグのしすぎかな、と思っています。
修正しましたので、次からは気をつけてみてください。「間違った！」と思ったら、エディタの「戻る」機能で元に戻せますし、変更セットを破棄することもできます。
また、大丈夫だとは思いますが、慣れないうちは地物を削除しないほうが、もしかしたらよいかもしれません。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119886094
nevw (2022-04-19 06:37:18+00:00): Private roads are mapped. access=private or other more suitable tags should be added if known
Old Man Pa (2022-04-21 03:10:02+00:00): Access=paid entry to tip
nevw (2022-04-21 04:59:27+00:00): I don't think Access=paid is a recognised tag yet.
I suggest adding access=customers or access=private and fee=yes to Tip Road

Note that these by convention are all lowercase except for names which are normally titlecase, but there maybe exceptions like the ref tag (reference) which could be either.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee

If you want to check particular tags, a Google search, for example,  'openstreetmap access' will often give more than enough info :)
CRCulver (2024-05-25 13:09:45+00:00): Please don't add wild camping places to OpenStreet (“Хорошее место для палаткиа”، “Good camping area”). The tourism=camp_site tag is for official camping sites only. For unofficial ones, they can be added to some other project like the iOverlander app.
txemt (2022-04-19 18:44:33+00:00): Please, leave Airline Highway as a trunk. This was discussed amongst editors who live and drive within the NOLA area. We agreed that Airline will be a trunk from NOLA to Memphis. 

Changing it to primary goes against the Louisiana wiki page. You are not a local Louisiana editor and just because you're in the Louisiana Slack room, doesn't mean you're privy to all conversations about Louisiana. 

Please keep this as a trunk highway as there is agreement amongst the local editors that this will remain trunk.
SomeoneElse (2022-04-19 13:51:54+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered, did you do this via a JOSM revert?  The changeset tags suggest you did, but the only change https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1052845128 suggests not.
We (the DWG) have had a number of complaints about people "reverting other people's changes" (including this one) when it doesn't actually look like the net result was a revert at all.
For the avoidance of doubt, changing access=YES to access=yes seems an entirely reasonable change, with the caveat that just removing the tag would make more sense given that it is a footway with a foot=yes tag already.
Best Regards.
Andy (from the DWG)
MarkG (2022-11-28 22:47:57+00:00): Target has permanently closed this store.
pfg21 (2022-04-27 07:26:59+00:00): подходит.
читаем вики
> Тег historic=archaeological_site не ограничивается только раскопками....
"archaeological_site" отмечает любое место, интересное с точки зрения археологии.
ZeLonewolf (2022-04-30 19:06:17+00:00): Hi there - I've made a few fixes to boundaries out of this changeset.  Some of the boundary relations were missing "roles" of "outer" or "inner" which are required.  Unfortunately iD does not warn you of this error...
gscholz (2022-04-20 04:25:40+00:00): Hi Diana IRM-ED,
this changeset created a mess of self intersecting ways. I have reverted it:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119887385

Kind Regards
Guido
Diana IRM-ED (2022-04-20 05:09:20+00:00): Hi Guido,
I appreciate your help for reminding me and revert it. Maybe next time you can just convey the location where there is a problem. Let us fix it without eliminating the existing data. Thanks
gscholz (2022-04-20 05:24:38+00:00): Hi Diana IRM-ED,
thanks for your response. As you are using JOSM you can use the internal validator to avoid such errors before you upload them. JOSM also shows warning messages if it detects such kind of errors. Lets work together to avoid such errors.
Guido
Diana IRM-ED (2022-04-20 05:47:27+00:00): Hi Guido,
Thank you for the advice, I do agree. Happy mapping :)
wireguy (2022-04-25 12:38:02+00:00): hi akuksouski,  can you look at the lincoln square relation?  looks like an extra section of west 60th is included.
akuksouski_lyft (2022-04-25 15:19:40+00:00): Hi, wireguy!
My name is Alexander and I am a mapper of the OSM Team at Lyft. I’m sorry I missed the highway and boundary overlay here and broke the relation. Thank you so much for pointing that out! 

The extra Lincoln Square relation’s member was removed in the changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/120167422 as well as incorrect tags from the boundary segments. Please, let me know if there are any issues with this changeset. 

Best regards, Alexander
喵耳引力波 (2022-04-20 05:43:27+00:00): 对该changeset表示异议，为何选用子公司而非母公司作为operator？
喵耳引力波 (2022-04-20 05:50:05+00:00): 因此我暂且在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119934160 中回退了这部分编辑，希望在能够更好达成一致以后再做动作（哪怕是把我退的再退了呢？）
Lepuse (2022-04-20 06:18:02+00:00): The operator tag is used to name a company, corporation, person or any other entity who is DIRECTLY in charge of the current operation of a map object.
branch为brand之衍生，不适用于operator。
而且部分您修改前的operator并不是修改后的母公司。
喵耳引力波 (2022-04-20 06:26:35+00:00): 以 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12494420 为例子
那您要如何标注它属于Q38180956的国能集团，这类最终控制它的集团，呢？

以及不是母公司这点我不是很赞同，特意都在天眼查上逐级查出来了是哪几大集团下属的。
user_11435438 (2022-04-20 12:26:24+00:00): 我觉得还是Lepuse的方式更为恰当，体现了实际运营到该层的单位。不然邮储银行的operator就得是中国邮政了，甚至再上一级：国务院。
喵耳引力波 (2022-04-20 12:31:37+00:00): 明白了，好的，我先退了我那个编辑了

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119952324

目前保持回Lepuse刚刚编辑后的状态
abakus_uploader (2022-04-19 22:31:11+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2022-04-20 14:06:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет множество тегов laisure=park. Это не совсем правильно.  
1. Парк здесь один и дорожки между деревьями не превращают один парк в десяток. Если вы считает, что это парк, то нужен один тег парка. На отношении  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1973796/history  
  
2. Тег laisure указан с опечаткой.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:leisure
Shaun das Schaf (2022-04-23 11:48:29+00:00): Hallo hegau-hiker,

du hast diesen Baum https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3883757014/history in einen Wegweiser umgeändert (natural=tree -> tourism=information mit information=guidepost). War das beabsichtigt?

Das würde bedeuten, dass hier kein Baum mehr steht. In diesem Fall entferne bitte auch die restlichen zum Baum gehörigen Angaben (denotation=urban und leaf_type=needleleaved).

Ansonsten bitte den Baum und den Wegweiser getrennt voneinander eintragen.

Danke und viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Warin61 (2022-04-19 06:50:32+00:00): Opps, that is  Kalamunda, Perth, WA!
abakus_uploader (2022-04-19 22:31:10+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Patchi (2022-04-23 10:12:40+00:00): Bonjour jcr83,

En juin 2021 sur le poteau indicateur (récent de surcroit) était bien indiqué "Le Vieil-Oppède" avec un trait d'union. Est-ce que ce poteau aurait été modifié et le trait d'union aurait-il disparu ?
Patchi (2022-04-23 10:14:56+00:00): Sur les poteaux dans le coin il y avait également un trait d'union voir par ex. le poteau indicateur Le Pradon https://www.mapillary.com/embed?image_key=514812876229525&style=photo
Patchi (2022-04-23 10:16:11+00:00): Enfin cette vue affiche la bonne direction "Le Vieil-Oppède" :
https://www.mapillary.com/embed?image_key=514812876229525&style=photo
jcr83 (2022-04-23 10:18:26+00:00): Non, c'est une erreur de ma part, désolé.
Peter Muret (2024-10-06 21:26:10+00:00): Why did you choose such a difficult sac-scale here at the pflerscher höhenweg?
O-edo (2024-10-07 17:12:40+00:00): i have not been there recently, if you have fresh information please update
RicoElectrico (2022-04-19 14:11:26+00:00): Przesunąłem ten AED do środka budynku, bo tak wskazywał opis. Będę wdzięczny za potwierdzenie, czy to poprawna lokalizacja.

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9676397317