piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robert46798 (2022-10-31 06:15:25+00:00): Hallo Peter,

ich bin gerade etwas knapp mit der Zeit. Zurücksetzten geht schnell, das habe ich den Abend noch gemacht. Ich schau mal, ob ich in den nächsten Tagen die Zeit finde die Relation zu ändern.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
Robert46798 (2022-10-31 19:41:21+00:00): So, jetzt habe ich es doch noch geschafft. Ich hoffe das passt alles so. Danke für die detailierte Arbeitsanweisung :-)

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128314313)
Map-Peter (2022-11-01 18:52:12+00:00): super :-)
 
Vielen Dank nochmal
user_18023081 (2022-12-27 12:33:01+00:00): what the f-
Dimitar155 (2022-12-10 10:20:30+00:00): Bună ziua, Ro-listener,

Vă rugăm să nu schimbați numele principal al străzilor și al altor obiecte. Dacă doriți să adăugați numele lor în limba română, apăsați butonul plus în câmpul de nume, selectați limba română și introduceți acolo numele românesc al acestuia.

Cele mai bune urări
Dimitar
eggie (2022-10-24 17:57:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Svp geen adresinfo toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrek. Er zijn al adresnodes. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
timoonen (2022-10-25 05:49:59+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Bedankt voor je feedback. Will do!

grtz,
Tim
eggie (2022-10-25 05:53:06+00:00): Top... volgens mij heb ik de adresinfo al verwijderd.
Mapse
Eggie
flohoff (2022-10-25 07:52:04+00:00): Aeh - das hier kann nicht passen. Demnach steht die Schutzhütte mitten in der Hausnummer 29 - das halte ich für falsch.

Flo
ElliottPlack (2023-03-10 13:27:56+00:00): Hi there,

I corrected this edit for you. The DWG has noticed a pattern of low quality or destructive edits that don't follow the community norms. Your use of a single account by multiple people also violates OSM policy. You must cease edits via a single account lest we block this account. 

In this particular edit it would have been better to close the portion of the road that enters the private compound. Further you should not use access=no, but rather access=private for private areas. No means no one.

Please reach out at data@openstreetmap.org

Thanks,  
Elliott Plack  
Data Working Group  
OpenStreetMap Foundation
EZRouting (2023-03-10 15:13:51+00:00): We will create separate accounts for each of our employees so that we follow OSM policies. We will also do a better job training our people so that the quality of our edits do not affect the community. Thanks for your understanding, we will try our best!
ElliottPlack (2023-03-10 16:19:12+00:00): Thank you. I should mention that it is a best practice for organizations doing collective editing to use accounts with a user's name and then an underscore and the company name. Example: eplack_EZRouting (if I worked there.) For inspiration, I suggest reviewing Lyft's list of users on GitHub. Setting up something like this would go a long way towards community acceptance. https://github.com/OSM-DCT-Lyft/US/wiki/OSM-Team-Members
EZRouting (2023-03-10 16:22:05+00:00): Thank you! That is exactly what we will do!
mkopinsky (2023-07-12 01:15:48+00:00): This discussion was 4 months ago and you're still using this shared account for numerous edits.
ElliottPlack (2023-07-12 13:52:30+00:00): EZrouting: please comment as to the status of the shared account issue and where your wiki link is located. Thanks!
mkopinsky (2023-07-24 04:29:23+00:00): Another 12 days have passed and EZRouting is *still* using a single shared account with no wiki page.
EZRouting (2023-07-24 14:04:09+00:00): Hello, sorry for the miscommunication. I had attempted to email you and had posted the wiki page on another discussion, you may have missed it. But here is our wiki page, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/EZRouting

I am the only one using this account right now. All our employees have been using single accounts after our conversation 5 months ago.
mkopinsky (2023-07-28 00:00:19+00:00): The wiki page says that this is a shared account. Can you update it to reflect that it's actually an individual account now, and list the usernames of the other members of your team? Ideally the other members of your team should be using usernames of the form something_ezrouting.
mkopinsky (2023-07-28 00:24:17+00:00): From some exploration, it seems that the team has at least the following members:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mark%20from%20EZRouting
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/EZrouting-Akif

Are there others? Those usernames do match the recommended pattern, but they just should be listed on the team wiki page.
EZRouting (2023-07-28 14:06:45+00:00): Thanks for catching that, I have updated our wiki page to reflect Mark and Akif. We will be having new team members, and I will add them to our wiki page once they are trained to properly edit the maps. Thank you!
Joseph R P (2022-12-04 23:56:51+00:00): Why did you change several roads, including a lengthy section of a U.S. Highway, to golf cartpaths?
JFred10 (2022-12-05 00:00:33+00:00): No idea what you are talking about.
JFred10 (2022-12-05 00:02:03+00:00): I don't see any cart paths
Joseph R P (2022-12-05 00:03:29+00:00): I remind you that, if this was unintentional, to please be more careful when making edits to roads when performing an edit on it that specifies what and what not can use it. Edits like these can reroute road traffic using nav systems with OSM data to unnecessarily long detours as golf cartpaths prohibit all road traffic besides golf carts and other authorized vehicles.
Joseph R P (2022-12-05 00:07:46+00:00): Sorry for the previous message sounding unresponsive to yours, as I started writing it before you sent yours.

If you look inside the highlighted changeset area you can see a gap in US 31A, which was created by you changing the road from highway=primary to golf=cartpath. Allisona Road was also changed to a golf cartpath. You might not see them if the map has already updated for you but this can be proven by looking at the ways you edited listed at the bottom of this changeset box and viewing the history of those objects.
JFred10 (2022-12-05 00:14:12+00:00): I certainly wasn't doubting you, just didn't see anything when I opened the map.
Joseph R P (2022-12-05 03:32:53+00:00): That aside, if this isn't just an error, is there a particular reason you changed traffic roads to golf cartpaths? By all means correct me if this is false, but I want to make a guess that this was intentional and you wanted to make it easier to get between the two golf courses in the area in a golfing simulator or something along the lines of that, since it seems like an odd error make. If this is true, please do not do this, as, like I had previously said, it's disruptive to people who use OpenStreetMap in real life. Edits that may improve simulator gameplay that are also useful for real life navigation or map detailing are welcome, but edits like these are damaging.
alex_lofi (2022-10-26 10:20:02+00:00): Las puedes poner si quieres pero yo añadiría access=private
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128008662
pitfire (2022-10-25 06:10:49+00:00): Hallo Udo,
was soll das werden? Ein Feld und Waldweg innerhalb der Bebauung als Einbahnstrasse? Der Weg hat keine Knotenverbindung zur Konrad-Adenauer-Straße?
noelbov (2022-10-25 17:15:20+00:00): I'm surprised because rcn=86 is on another place according to https://www.fietsnet.be/routeplanner/default.aspx and https://www.routeyou.com/user/planner/608873/bikenode-brussels-the-brussels-bottom-up-cyclingnode-network, meaning that there is no route 68-86 too ...
Is the signposting wrong or what's going on?
Thanks for answer.
nb
Thierry1030 (2022-10-25 17:30:49+00:00): those routeplanners are on this location NOT up to date. I already sent the info to routeyou. And I will upload one of these days images to Mapillary ...
noelbov (2022-10-25 20:53:17+00:00): So, the two route planners advised by 'Visit Brussels' on https://www.visit.brussels/en/visitors/plan-your-trip/cycling-node-network are not up to date?
Do you know of an alternative website that is up to date?
Regards
nb
Thierry1030 (2022-10-26 09:36:40+00:00): "So, the two route planners advised by 'Visit Brussels' on https://www.visit.brussels/en/visitors/plan-your-trip/cycling-node-network are not up to date?" -> that's correct.
I don't know an alternative website that is up to date.
Thierry1030 (2022-11-17 14:24:04+00:00): for your info:
RouteYou is up to date since ... today!! ;-)
https://www.routeyou.com/user/planner/608873/bikenode-brussels-the-brussels-bottom-up-cyclingnode-network
noelbov (2022-11-17 15:11:50+00:00): Thank you very much !
SHARCRASH (2022-10-24 18:34:17+00:00): Hi! Why the change from track to path? What's blocking passage for an forestry or agricultural vehicle?
SHARCRASH (2022-10-24 18:35:36+00:00): This way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331424748 i've passed at entrance 2 days ago it seemed to be still a track from the entrance.
peter_osm (2022-10-25 04:22:17+00:00): Hi, 

I was there on Sunday and the width of the way is quite small. In fact it allows persons on most of the way just to walk one behind the other.
SHARCRASH (2022-10-25 20:29:56+00:00): OK thank you for the information!
VictorIE (2022-10-24 18:25:45+00:00): Should this be office=financial ?

If the car park is private, should it carry a name at all?
GinaroZ (2022-10-25 18:29:31+00:00): Fixed the typo and added the office.
I mean you could still have a private car park with a name, though I've changed it to operator.
eggie (2022-10-24 19:18:46+00:00): Hi el-flo  The tagging was okay here with

vehicle=destination

Please don't add accesstags  .....=no here. 
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-10-24 19:21:33+00:00): Removed additional tagging. 
The tagging with vehicle=destination is okay..
martien-176 (2022-10-27 09:58:55+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square and precise as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Please watch this short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128009407
SekeRob (2022-10-26 10:11:49+00:00): Hi,

Your H2 updated path always ended at a cliff  reaching the top, but now it's mapped too in OSM. Must be an pretty impressive sight from there going by 3D imagery, on a clear day of course. A viewpoint node would certainly not be out of place I think in that spot, worth the hiking travails getting there.

ciao
user_9434724 (2022-10-25 09:43:57+00:00): Hello, this changeset has been reverted in whole in changeset #128031021 due to the addition of fictional roads. Please do not do this unless you can provide verification such roads exist.
Map-Peter (2022-10-25 18:41:36+00:00): Warum machst du aus "canal" nun "fairway" ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106661268#map=16/53.3711/12.7738
hiker_88 (2022-10-25 19:23:53+00:00): Ich hatte nicht vor, einen bestehenden Weg zu ändern, nur  neue hinzuzufügen, damit die Routenberechnung in Osmand Wege aus dem Bolter Kanal auf die Müritz findet. Wenn das irgendetwas durcheinanderbringt, brauchen die Änderungen nicht online gehen.
Map-Peter (2022-10-27 21:43:04+00:00): Ich rede hier doch nicht von den neuen, von dir gemappten, ways - sondern von dem oben, von mir, verlinkten way. Da solltest du zumindest einmal drauf klicken und dir das anschauen ...
:-/
 
Du willst mir also wirklich sagen das du einen way von "canal" zu "fairway" änderst, aber das ein Versehen war?
So etwas musst du beim Mappen doch merken ...
hiker_88 (2022-10-27 22:36:41+00:00): Wovon Du redetest, war durchaus klargeworden. In JOSM habe ich durchaus den von Dir angelegten Weg weiterhin als canal gesehen. Wie dem auch sei, es tut mir leid.
74523978 (2022-10-25 17:56:11+00:00): Hoort niet, zijn geen officiële namen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 19:34:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128012029 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible edits in West Africa. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6482
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 19:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128012029 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible edits in West Africa. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6482
eggie (2022-10-25 18:17:20+00:00): Dag Hugo.. Alle adresinfo en phone heb ik van de gebouwomtrek verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-25 08:59:15+00:00): Hoi   Henk..
Misverstand? 
surface=ground  dat is wel juist een valide tag (tenminste als dat klopt) , maar 
tacktype=GROND klopte niet en die regels heb ik eerder verwijderd.
Dus surface=ground zou dus heel goed kunnen kloppen.  of dirt e.d. 
Zie wiki. 

tracktype=grond is helemaal niets in osm.  Daar hoort grade1 t/m 5 bij.

surface en tracktype zijn verwarrend.. 
.. tracktype werd alleen bij tracks gebruikt als specificatie. Nu kennelijk bij alle wegen. 

Zelf voeg ik alleen tracktype toe aan highway=track

Mocht je vragen hebben stel ze gerust. 

Groet
eggie
Henksbg61 (2022-10-25 09:35:52+00:00): Ai, ja misverstand. Duidelijk.
eggie (2022-10-25 09:38:50+00:00): Ik kan 'reverten' als je wilt.. Scheelt weer werk.. zeg t maar.
Henksbg61 (2022-10-25 09:51:27+00:00): Ik kijk zelf wel even want ik heb daar nog wat paden toegevoegd. Dan neem ik die ook gelijk mee. Dank
eggie (2022-10-25 09:56:53+00:00): Top
eggie (2022-10-25 09:57:42+00:00): Hier zie je wat je hebt aangepast als je klikt op een wegdeel. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128010913
RobertH-PUM (2022-10-27 13:14:05+00:00): If this motorway is just planned and not in construction, then the tags need fixing. "construction=motorway" is wrong
NorthCrab (2023-01-02 18:07:15+00:00): Witaj, proszę nie nadawaj nazw paczkomatom. Wystarczy samo ref= a nazwa wygeneruje się automatycznie. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2619146751 Pozdrawiam!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-16 07:25:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4856635874 - is shop=pizza intentional there? Is it adding some useful info?
RedAuburn (2023-01-24 22:20:55+00:00): thank you for these, best not to add building=house to the entrance nodes though :) fixed now
spiregrain (2023-01-24 22:27:15+00:00): Oops!  Thanks you.   I don't think I made a habit of it!
Hufkratzer (2022-10-25 16:16:19+00:00): Hi, you have mapped two nested areas with tags leisure=horse_riding + sport=horse_racing:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161706979
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106674286

It is a mystery to me what this is supposed to stand for. Please explain. If it is to be a riding arena, usehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 19:33:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 19:34:56+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 128003622, 128006899, 128007256, 128009770, 128010128, 128010444, 128010834, 128010999, 128011205.
silversurfer83 (2022-10-25 09:35:19+00:00): Moin,
Du hast vor ein paar Tagen schon einen Punkt vor dem Gebäude bearbeitet/erzeugt, der den Namen der Flugschule trägt. Ist diese in diesem Gebäude beheimatet?

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128012181
cyton (2022-10-25 03:55:20+00:00): hab auch gesehen, dass da was verbarrikadiert war, hab aber nicht genauer drauf geachtet...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

besser wäre es das mit einem lifecycle prefix zu lösen, dann bleibt die historie des poi bestehen.
jetzt ist es aber auch egal, der florist hatte keinen namen, keine website, keine öffnungszeiten etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128012216
cyton (2022-10-25 03:57:58+00:00): auch hier hätte man mit dem lifecycle prefix die tags behalten können, da der way nicht gelöscht wurde ist das aber egal
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128012362
ivanbranco (2022-10-27 18:51:16+00:00): Ciao Marco, benvenuto su OSM!

Questa modifica non mi torna molto, hai spostato un albero e un bar in mezzo alla strada sterrata. Il bar prima era posizionato dentro ad un edificio, mi sembra piu' plausibile la posizione precedente.

Inoltre posso chiederti cosa intendi con tratto "sperimentale"?

buon mapping :)
Vezzoni Marco - Cammino del Po (2022-10-28 09:40:23+00:00): ciao 
Sono Vezzoni Marco dell'ASD Il cammino del Po APS.
stiamo tracciando con CAI e AIPo il cammino del Po partendo dal tratto sperimentale "Casalmaggiore Cremona" che abbiamo rilevato con GPS. 
In  queste sere con CAI stimo facendo un corso per imparare a usare OSM, non credevo di fare dei pasticci ...

se riesci riporta gli errori che involontariamente ho commesso alla situazione precedente 

se vuoi sentiamoci
ti lascio mio cell 338 5631260
Marco
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 20:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128013397 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an implausible edit in West Africa. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6483
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-10-24 20:03:18+00:00): 😵
source=survey;ЕГРН
ivanbranco (2022-10-27 18:41:28+00:00): Ciao Marco, anche qua mi sembra strano. Hai spostato un benzinaio dentro ad una zona residenziale, era voluto?
Strubbl (2022-10-26 17:09:55+00:00): Hallo poldus_fcb, 
warum trägt dieses Gebäude den Namen Lotusblume?

Viele Grüße
poldus_tvr (2022-10-26 17:40:59+00:00): Hallo Strubbl,
das ist der Name, den wir unserer Wg und unserem Haus gegeben haben.
Viele Grüße
Strubbl (2022-10-26 20:38:45+00:00): Hi poldus_fcb, 
private Namen bzw. private Daten überhaupt gehören nicht in die OSM-Datenbank - siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
Anders wäre es, wenn ich vom öffentlichen Teil der Spielmannsauer Straße aus diesen Namen an eurem Haus in großen Buchstabend lesen kann. Dann wäre der Name für andere Kartierer nachvollziehbar und könnte auch in OSM landen. Aber das klingt deiner Beschreibung nach eher nicht so.

Wenn ihr eine Karte mit euren WGs anlegen wollt und auf OSM basieren wollt, empfehle ich eine uMap anzulegen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UMap/Guide
Dort könnt ihr eintragen, was ihr möchtet und die Karte untereinander teilen.

Kannst du den Namen hier bitte wieder entfernen?

Viele Grüße
Dodko (2022-10-30 18:42:55+00:00): Budovy je dobré zarovnávať do pravého uhla, klávesová skratka Q.

Ak je to samostatný rodinný dom namiesto building=house použiť building=detached
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 20:10:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128013242 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an implausible edit in West Africa. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6483
tiptracks (2022-10-25 07:24:36+00:00): Hoi Henk, heb je dit ter plaatse geverifieerd? Op recente luchtfoto's zie ik vrij duidelijk een pad (of paadje) lopen parallel aan de Peesterweg, dus ik twijfel of deze edit juist is
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128012941
Henksbg61 (2022-10-26 07:35:13+00:00): Pad stond niet juist op de kaart, dacht daardoor dat het weg was. Heb het nu gecorrigeerd.
tiptracks (2022-10-26 16:57:22+00:00): Ah, vandaar. Mooi dat het hersteld is!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 20:10:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 128012814.
user_18526234 (2023-03-02 15:36:21+00:00): Hello osm915,
I seems that you have added an man_made=flowerbed:
https://www.osm.org/way/1106682315
    
I recently started documenting and using landcover=flowerbed as an alternative to the controversial landuse=flowerbed. 
  
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=flowerbed
  
Would you mind it if I change this objects tag from man_made=flowerbed to landcover=flowerbed? Or even better would be if you change it to show support to landcover=flowerbed.
Please let me know what you think.
  
Best regards,
Tjuro
osm915 (2023-03-05 18:32:51+00:00): Hi Tjuro (_QA)
I have used landcover occasionally myself (for grass). But in case of flowerbeds, I do not think it is better suited than man_made.
For example, interlaced landcover (flowerbed inside grass) would have similar problems than interlaced landuse. And changing from man_made to landcover would not make any notably difference in the osm database anyway, as landuse is leading by far.
So I am sorry, I think the change would only have benefits after "some consensus" (aka proposal).

Also, it would be nice, if you could add some information/links regarding alternative flowerbed tagging to the new wiki-page ;-)

Happy mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-24 20:15:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 128012541.
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 14:53:38+00:00): thank you for mapping
please do not forget to square the buildings after mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128013464
alix_geovelo (2022-11-09 16:16:23+00:00): Re bonjour :)

Est-ce c'est une bien une voie verte entre caen et hérouville ? Séparée de la voie ? Je ne vois pas sur l'imagerie, mais si c'est le cas je pense qu"on peut rajouter les tags pour voie verte.



Merci

Alix de Geovelo
Nzau (2022-11-09 21:45:54+00:00): Oui effectivement une toute nouvelle voie verte super large avec un a certain endroit un trottoir protéger à l'opposer vient d'être mise en place ! Voilà un article qui en parle : https://actu.fr/normandie/mathieu_14407/pistes-cyclables-la-voie-herouville-caen-bientot-terminee-route-de-lion-sur-mer_53285639.html

Mais de toute manière je comptais mis rendre prochainement afin de prendre en photo et de cartographier en détail ce nouvelle itinéraire parce que justement ont ne peux pas encore le voir sur l'imagerie.
Mais effectivement je vais mettre les tags qui vont bien.

Merci
jumbanho (2023-06-05 18:49:55+00:00): The Vermillion Highlands web page states that there is no bicycling allowed.  Is there information that states otherwise? https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/wmas/detail_report.html?id=WMA0184300
alix_geovelo (2022-11-09 11:17:29+00:00): Bonjour

Pouvez-vous nous préciser pourquoi vous avez  supprimé les tags sur la voie verte du gdu boulevard du 18/06 et du générale de gaulle ? 

Merci !
Alix de Geovelo
Nzau (2022-11-09 11:35:06+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous parlez probablement des tags "bicycle=designated" et "foot=designated" j'ai tout simplement cru qu'ils ne servaient pas puisque de base pour un "highway=path" les attributs pour foot et bicycle sont réglées sur "yes". Je pensais donc qu'il n'étais pas utile d'ajouter "designated" mais que l'ajout du type de surface suffisait. Je n'avais également pas fait attention aux anciennes modifications. 
Je suis donc désolé de mon erreur et je corrige cela de suite ! 

Merci à vous et n'hésiter surtout pas à me faire savoir lorsque j'ai fait des erreurs pour que je puisse m'améliorer dans le futurs.
alix_geovelo (2022-11-09 13:01:09+00:00): Bonjour, 

Aucun problème ! 
ces tags sont les tags définissant précisemment les voies vertes, comme indiqué dans le wiki à cette page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes

C'est un des cas spécifiques de tag pour aménagement vélo, n'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions :)

Cyclablement,
Alix de Geovelo
divaddivag (2022-11-09 23:31:24+00:00): Bonsoir, je vois que tu as aussi enlevé les tags 'designated' sur un bon nombre de 'voies vertes' dans le secteur ainsi que sur Bayeux et Courseulles. Merci de les remettre! De plus ces voies vertes ne sont pas nommées à ma connaissance. Donc il faut enlever ces noms qui n'ont rien d'officiel. bien à toi D