piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NieWnen (2021-11-29 14:00:42+00:00): Dlaczego zamieniłeś przejścia na chodnik (path->footway)? Poprzednie były w porządku. Teraz jest niespójność rowerowa i duplikowanie przejść. Jeśli chcesz miec oznaczone oba, to ewentualnie można rozdizelić linie na 2 (tak było wcześniej zanim to zmieniłem)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dcrossing

Co do tactile. To na liniach na pewno go nie powinno być. Obczaj na wiki przykład japońskiego przejścia, to zrozumiesz o czym mówię:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Tactile_paving_on_crossing_ja.jpg

A co do innych węzłów wydaje się zbędny/nieprawidłowy, bo już inne są (razem z kerb), przez co jest duplikowany w nieprawidłowych miejscach, a na przecięciu z jezdnią dodaje się go jak brakuje na węzłach z krawężnikiem w celu uproszczenia. Wiki rekomenduje ustawianie go właśnie w miejscu konkretnych wypustek.

Co do crossing:island nie mam pojęcia czy to jest poprawne czy nie, bo na wiki jest to używane na węzłach tylko z przecięciu z drogą z kolei tu są 2 przecięcia więc na przecięciach nie można, ale jak dla mnie wydaje się w porządku.
G_P_J (2021-11-29 10:28:31+00:00): Nadal proszę o niedodawanie duplikatów adresów i nazw miejscowości jako ulicy.
witkoo (2021-11-29 10:46:09+00:00): Mam to na uwadze, tem dodany przeze mnie jest domem jednorodzinnym oznaczonym nr 622. Obiekt na zachód to budynek gospodarczy (stodoła) więc raczej nr mieć nie powinien (no chyba, że się mylę) pozdrawiam
G_P_J (2021-11-29 10:52:07+00:00): Ok, zamienię numerację, ale dom jednorodzinny miał wpisaną nazwę miejscowości w tag addr:street zamiast addr:place.
osmviborg (2021-11-28 09:21:13+00:00): MobilePay?
AsgerFrank (2021-11-28 22:50:00+00:00): Jeg havde skyndingen desværre kun tid til at konstatere at man ikke kunne bruge sin femmer, og at mit chip- og kontaktløst dan- eller visakort åbnede dørene.
Det kunne være godt hvis nogen havde lejlighed til at aflægge et toiletbesøg og udfylde alle betalings-tags.
Jeg forudsætter at cash kun er mønter og sedler, og MobilePay skal tagges særskilt (som payment:mobilepay=*).
AsgerFrank (2021-12-05 18:21:50+00:00): Hvor "heldig" har man lov at være: En nedfalden køreledning gav et uventet ophold på København H, så jeg selv kunne udforske betalingsforholdene, og oven i købet genere vagten dermed.  DONE  :-)
osmviborg (2021-12-05 19:40:07+00:00): 🎯
Frans S (2021-11-28 11:04:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or roads.
Please tag buildings just as building=yes.
Don't map other features than buildings and highways. See the project instructions

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114317417
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Dawid2849 (2021-12-02 16:31:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993985553
Ten fragment powinien mieć access=no?
zuicz (2021-12-02 17:14:01+00:00): nie, nie zauważyłem go
Tilia_J (2021-11-28 16:50:14+00:00): Beste Sjoemard,

Een oadafsluiting in je changeset comment terwijl je geen access restrictie op een pad hebt gezet. 

Waarom heb je de locality verplaatst?

Dat er hier een hamsterreservaat zou zijn is mij ook niets van bekend.
sjoemard (2021-11-28 17:58:56+00:00): Beste Tilia, 
Dit is niet goed gegaan, mijn comment (en de afsluiting van het pad) heeft betrekking op een pad in Zuid Limburg. 
Een oadafsluiting, zegt mij niks? En het verplaatsen van een locality ook niet?! 
Kun je dat toelichten, danwel de wijzigingen die ik hier heb gemaakt herstellen? Ik zie niet wat ik hier heb gewijzigd?!
Groet, Sjoerd
Tilia_J (2021-11-28 18:05:40+00:00): Oadafsluiting = typo = padafsaluiting.

Hier is je change visueel: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114317590

Je hebt de plaats "Mosselsche Berg"  van rechtsboven (rode stip) naar linksonder (groene stip) verplaatst.

Zal ik de changeset in zijn geheel voor je terugdraaien?
sjoemard (2021-11-28 18:11:07+00:00): Duidelijk wat je bedoeld nu.  Als het voor jou eenvoudig terug te zetten is dan heel graag! En bedankt voor je alertheid.
Leo Slager (2021-11-29 17:22:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction.

a node or 1 or more ways can have the role "via".

However not every routing app can work with the relations.

The restrictions were already on the map. And OSRM does not make a left turn here. So that is good.
however OSRM did make the right turn.  This needs to be investigated.
Frans S (2021-11-28 11:00:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114318178
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-11-28 10:08:01+00:00): 感谢❤️
Colin Smale (2021-11-28 15:45:54+00:00): Hi! May I ask how you determined the exact location of Windy Gyle peak? The boundary now seems to be some distance away from the *(accurately surveyed) {lat,lon} location given by the OS in Boundary-Line, although it does now align with some aerial imagery, which is known to be susceptible to misalignments.
chesterwalker (2021-11-29 22:50:33+00:00): Hi, I didn't use aerial imagery for this edit. The peak is based on the location of the trig point from a survey, using my own GPS trace and the relative location of the highest ground compared to the other mapped features (i.e. between Russell's Cairn and where the other footpaths meet, where a continuation of the line between the cairn and the trig point is the direction of one of the paths to the wall).
The location of the summit may not still be exactly correct, but I think it is more accurate than where it was before, both in absolute terms (lat/lon) and in relation to the other existing mapped features, namely:
-being north (not south west) of the point where the footpaths meet and
-being located on the Scotland/England border, rather than on the Scottish side.
There was a discrepancy between the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels and the plotted border in the region around the footpaths, but happy to revert if you think Boundary-Line is more accurate than the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels (which I understood to be 'perfectly aligned'). I haven't seen how the Boundary-Line data compares to my edit. Which part do you think is wrong and in what way? Do you agree with the location of the footpaths? Where do you think the peak is?
Dave Venables (2021-11-28 10:28:10+00:00): addr:street
Hieronymousch (2021-11-28 10:30:02+00:00): #UNMappers
ToniE (2021-11-29 10:19:34+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM.

Sind die 4 Straßen alle für (Linien-)Busse in Radfahrer:innen in beide Richtung befahrbar?

Dann müsste noch getagged werden:

oneway:psv = no  (Public Service Vehicles)

oder 

oneway:bus = no

und

oneway:bicycle = no

mit

cycleway=opposite

oder gegebenenfalls anderes cycleway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Viele Grüße

Toni
PT-53 (2022-10-18 08:23:38+00:00): Hallo FahRadler,
Du hast bei diesem Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124750365/history
das Merkmal
- website=http://www.jysk.de
ergänzt. 
In OSMOSE wird nun bemängelt, daß dort ja bereits ein Eintrag
- contact:website=http://www.daenischesbettenlager.de/unsere-filialen/baden-wuerttemberg/sigmaringen-friedrich-list-strasse-1.html
vorhanden ist und die beiden Einträge nicht übereinstimmen.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
FahRadler (2022-10-21 14:53:32+00:00): Hallo PT-53

danke für den Hinweis - ist mir damals nicht aufgefallen, habs gefixt.

Danke und Grüße

FahRadler
conradoos (2021-11-28 13:07:07+00:00): Nie nakładaj na siebie wielokrotnie tego samego użytkowania terenu. I nie przyklejaj użytkowania terenu do dróg.
czebureks (2022-02-04 03:15:08+00:00): Cześć, aby uniknąć nieporozumień proponuję przyjąć za źródło dla granic dzielnic na terenie miasta Gdańska tę mapę, gdzie przebieg granicy można prześledzić co do krawędzi działki: https://mapa.gdansk.gda.pl/ipg/app/index
Granice te zaimportowałem z danych Wydziału Geodezji UMG: https://www.gdansk.pl/otwarte-dane?show=byGroup&id=dane-przestrzenne
Pozdrawiam
eggie (2021-11-28 11:22:59+00:00): Dag Bas.. tagging lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-28 12:05:36+00:00): Dag RG
Je vraagt feedback .. 
Kijk eens naar de foutmelding..
Ze hadden zeker een paar borden over die te pas kwamen. 
Dat zie je wel meer, maar kloppen doet het niet.  Denk zelfs dat de oneway=yes beter kunt verwijderen. Ik zie ook geen pijlen staan op het wegdek. 

De foutmelding kun je ook wegkrijgen door de serviceroad rond te laten lopen via die laadplaatsen.  Het is toch niet doodlopend hier.
unclassified kun je beter veranderen highway=service  Het is geen openbare weg meer
MVG
eggie
Kateregga1 (2021-11-28 15:23:01+00:00): Thanks for mapping, but please use Maxar Standard imagery as it is the most recent for this area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114319696
SekeRob (2021-11-28 11:20:10+00:00): Victoire, renders.
mstriewe (2021-11-28 18:15:44+00:00): Hallo László! In diesem Änderungssatz ist ein Multipolygon übrig geblieben, das keine inner-Mitglieder mehr hat (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2877272). Durch die von dir ergänzten vielen Details scheint es ohnehin nicht mehr zu stimmen. Vielleicht lässt sich das auch noch korrigieren und verbessern. MfG Michael
conradoos (2021-11-28 11:35:25+00:00): Cześć. Dlaczego sklejasz trawniki z drogami? I dlaczego w ogóle rysujesz trawniki na drogach? Obszar drogi można za pomocą area:highway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:area:highway
Wtedy będziesz miał wypełnioną landusem całą mapę.
Владимир К (2022-11-12 17:56:03+00:00): Не нужно прикреплять жилые зоны в дорожкам, это ошибка.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-11-29 11:53:45+00:00): Jesteś pewien że ta piekarnia jest już otwarta?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-11-29 11:56:15+00:00): A faktycznie.

https://www.facebook.com/PiekarniaFerment/posts/444052920645169

Mieszkam w tym bloku i przegapiłem, więc dzięki za informacje!
pan_borsuk (2021-11-29 12:13:11+00:00): rzeczy dzieją się tak szybko :-D

a te chlebki czy drożdżówy często wypieka własnymi ręcami też... Mateusz :-)

/pozdro dla smakoszy :-)
CENTRALHUB (2022-02-14 08:59:31+00:00): Hi, you have added some building in weird shapes and only with English name. Please ensure that you are mapping the features correctly and accurately, and use Chinese instead of English in the name field. Otherwise they will be treated as unverifiable features and might be removed. Thanks.
Hong洪 (2022-02-15 08:54:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for the support. I've added Chinese to name fields so hope that is correct. some of the buildings are weird shapes! also do you have any suggestions on how to trace path / road GPX files other than manually having to draw them over the traces? thanks.
CENTRALHUB (2022-02-17 05:21:27+00:00): It's a good idea to think about that you are providing a public map for everyone, and you could investigate how other people map similar consent in other location. For example, if all the buildings are owned by "Wildhomestay.com", you may create a region to includes all the buildings and map it as a "hotel". So you don't need to put the "guest_house" in every properties. Besides, you may also use a point to represent a feature (like restaurant), if it doesn't use the whole building. Finally, I also have question regarding the "Yoga Land". If it's just a location where people do yoga other than a sport facility, it's not a good idea to map it. Usually, we map "what it is" or "what's its primary usage" in OSM, instead of "what people are doing there". 
There is an official mapping tool called JOSM, and it's use by most of the professional OSM mapper. It's easier to map rectangle there and I remember it can load GPX.
Thanks.
eggie (2021-12-01 09:37:38+00:00): Dag trein vogers.. Goed dat je om feedback vraagt.
Het zijn geen parkeerterreinen.

Nu zie je allemaal grote P's op de kaart.
Wat ik deed in het begin is steeds zoiets opzoeken in de wiki.
Dus taggen als 
amenity=parking
parking=street_side
parking:orientation =perpendicular
capacity=.... 

Kijk eens naar https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

.. en dan netjes intekenen.
Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114321566
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-01 09:42:53+00:00): Maar reageren op een review waar je zelf om vraagt doe je niet.
Je aantal parkeerplaatsen is gewoon gegokt. Dat klopt ook niet.
Probeer eens aandacht te besteden aan je toevoegingen.. Dat is voor je zelf ook leuker.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-01 09:45:01+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast
Frans S (2021-11-28 15:29:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114321671
bxl-forever (2021-11-29 23:18:41+00:00): Hello,

The brewery is only this building, right? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35994932

This area here is triggering lots of validation issues.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006957875

A landuse area should not have an address or contact details.  Landuse is mostly used as a portion of territory.

industrial=brewery is a deprecated tag, please do not use it.  (As always, tags in OSM are what we use to build the database; never rely on iD presets, they is a lot of crap there.)

type=multipolygon should only be used on a multipolygon (a MP is a special type of relation), not on an ordinary area.
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:31:40+00:00): Fixed
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-27 10:54:04+00:00): Fix also the MP on the landuse : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131767008

@Jhowie_Nitnek : on what source or document you have use to make the outline of the Brouwerij ? Asking because the part near Breeveld (a91g parcel) is now a brownfield with rest of previous building and the old building was never connected to the existing one (fence are still in the same place) ; as industrial efficiencies it's a little strange not connecting together.
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-27 10:58:41+00:00): I know the brewery fairly well and they own the brownfield, the eventual plan is to construct a new wing on that plot, I will chance the landuse, what would you recommend I chance it to?
RaphaelPasloin (2023-01-27 11:17:07+00:00): Ok thanks ; let's be simple and keep the landuse like this (will be still a industrial in the futur).
Frans S (2021-11-28 12:14:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing in your mapping.
The Imagery to map from is not that good.
Switch to the Esri world Imagery (clearity) Beta
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114321753
pitfire (2021-11-28 13:05:33+00:00): Hallo Treut68,
willkommen bei OSM.
Was sollte das werden?
Bitte informiere Dich über einen verantwortungvollen Umgang mit Einträgen in die OSM Datentenbank:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erfasse_keine_Vorschriften.2C_die_nicht_durch_Gegenst.C3.A4nde_vor_Ort_repr.C3.A4sentiert_werden
eggie (2021-11-28 12:35:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

feedback Wanneer er een bord woonerf staat klopt het. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-28 13:45:37+00:00): Je stuk woonerf zat niet (meer)  vast aan de Pr Hendrikstraat (hoofdrijbaan)
Ik heb de straat weer verbonden.
gr eggie
Catootje91 (2021-11-28 16:37:35+00:00): Dat bord woonerf staat er, een stukje verplaatst vorig jaar.  Waarom het woonerf niet meer vastzit is me niet duidelijk, niet bewust iets aan veranderd
eggie (2021-11-28 17:45:01+00:00): Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen. We geven tips waar jet fout dreigt te gaan. Meestal worden zakenhersteld zonder dat je er weet van hebt.
Goed mappen en waar op te letten komt vanzelf
Mapse
Eggie
Catootje91 (2021-11-28 18:16:08+00:00): Of is het de bedoeling dat je ook alle nieuwe koppelingen die ontstaan doordat er een woonerf aansluit op de hoofdrijbaan definieert ipv de beperkte mogelijkheden van een voetpad?
eggie (2021-11-28 18:26:29+00:00): Nee.. het is zo goed.. Soms kunnen wegen gewoon losraken bij bv opsplitsen. Dat heb je hier gedaan. Eén deel was immers geen oneway. Toen zijn de wegdelen losgeraakt. Duplicated nodes is dan de foutmelding. 
 De nodes zijn de verbindingsstukken. Los of vast zie je niet met editor iD.
Ik draai een 'validator'.. 
De tussenknopen ..ook nodes..zorgen ervoor dat de weg een bocht kan maken. Daar ontstaan die fouten niet.
Daarom steeds even checken of de wegen nog wel vastzitten bij splitsen. Dat splitsen heb je later gedaan op de hoofdroute.
Misschien heb je het schaartje gebruikt?
Het is zo verder goed zo.
pitfire (2021-11-28 13:22:07+00:00): Es gibt viele Gründe, warum du von Änderungssatz-Kommentaren Gebrauch machen solltest, um deine Bearbeitung zu beschreiben: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Riyadi IRM-RV (2023-03-21 04:14:05+00:00): Hi sal73x.
thank you for your outstanding contribution to osm. 
I do an armchair validation about relation in maproullete and found 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/13487972

I saw your history. you are an advanced mapper in osm. i require some advice for you, i would love to hear your opinion about multipolygon.

1. in my understanding the multi polygon must consist of more than 1. polygon to explain the attachment of 1 object to another object https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
I wonder, in this case, you changed the common polygon (place island) and turn it into a multi polygon which is only one polygon with one role.

2. the natural coastline little bit unique to draw in osm. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline
Tagging the coastline is a bit different than with all other features in OSM and Make sure use natural=coastline on ways, not nodes or relations. but the other hand. relation with natural=bare_rock type=multipolygon - and maybe other tags such as name=* + place=islet example
natural=coastline way would be in this relation with outer role

the wiki presents contradictive phrases. make me confused.

in my lack of knowledge. I love to hear your opinion, especially on Pulau Malaka Island. thank you
eggie (2021-11-28 13:41:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Lee Carré (2021-11-29 00:15:23+00:00): Hold on. In http://www.osm.org/changeset/114322065 you moved the original addr:housenumber=70 node and tagged it as tourism=apartment . In this set, you made a new node at the original location of what is now the Tetra PoI and then also tagged this new one as addr:housenumber=70 (and as an advertising agency).

How can two entirely different businesses be operating at the same address?

http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Lee Carré (2022-01-01 05:04:52+00:00): Re the sole node in this changeset

“name = factory (sixbynine ltd)”

name = Factory
operator = Sixbynine Ltd
Frans S (2021-11-28 15:28:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114322181
zvenzzon (2021-11-29 08:16:05+00:00): Saknas även "construction site" för nya badhuset. några parkeringar öster om friluftsbad har fått tas bort osv.
Frans S (2021-11-28 15:20:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
See my previous comment
+
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114322721