piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ma-rt-in (2019-05-16 11:25:53+00:00): Hello,
the argument that "only" 2000 times the key is used, it rather weak. Well it may be that it helps to find bugs, but it is not necessary after PTv2. In addition, it can be determined via the entry at pt = stop_position whether there is an error in the route.
azakh-world (2019-05-16 13:17:47+00:00): Neither tagging scheme in OSM is final truth. Often they reinforce existing good practices afterwards. By the way, Hamburg S-bahn doesn't conform PTv2. Also, additional tags (like light_rail=yes) may not contradict other tagging.
As alternative to light_rail=yes I can offer to tag all Hamburg S-Bahn stations with station=light_rail. It is approved: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:station%3Dlight_rail
user_5359 (2019-05-19 17:06:46+00:00): Hello! What ist the meaning of holt? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole .  Did you mean the key ref?
Mark Holt (2019-05-19 20:12:49+00:00): Ha!  My last name is "Holt" and my hands accidentally typed it instead of "hole".  I just fixed it.  Thanks for finding that.
Rom1 (2019-05-15 09:18:40+00:00): Bonjour, voici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70266570 qui est plus simple et correct.
Verdy_p (2019-05-14 22:47:44+00:00): Note: this changeset was interrupted by server that closed it in the middle while resolving  edit conflicts in the Netherlands.
This should have concerned only Saint-Martin (but yes very near the French-Dutch border, in a tiny area of Saint-Martin)
Retired Account (2019-05-14 23:34:52+00:00): Hi,
I don't think there is a need to remove the stop node even if the station is still under construction, because the node stop itself is already marked as under construction.
azakh-world (2019-05-15 12:48:07+00:00): Hi.
Your point is not devoid of logic, but as soon as it comes to real application, better to keep things as simple as possible.
I know at least 3 really used tagging methods for stations under construction:
1) railway=construction + construction=station
2) railway=station + construction=yes
3) construction:railway=station
Also station may be prefixed with unused:, planned:, etc. When pulling information about a route, instead of recognizing and refusing all variants of disused or simply erroneous objects, better not to have them in routes at all.
Yet another reason. Each station, whether operational or under construction, is an object that has the right to be drawn on the map. Different thing is a subway route which describes not a thing on the ground but a service. No boarding/unboarding facility at a point - no stop in the route.
Retired Account (2019-05-15 13:09:08+00:00): In terms of relation, it will be preferable to just use another role (i.e. construction_stop) instead of role (stop) for the member node instead of deleting the node from the relation. By deleting off the node, it makes maintenance of such relations difficult.

The node itself is already tagged with the construction tag so no issues with that.
Leo Slager (2019-05-14 23:02:51+00:00): Dag ivop,
wees voorzichtig met het schuiven van de kaart in de edit-modus. Vaak neem je ongewild een punt of een lijn mee en dan ontstaat er ongemerkt veel schade aan de kaart. Houd daarom je changeset beperkt tot een klein gebied. Verschuif daarna de kaart en maak een tweede changeset.
user_408553 (2019-05-15 08:09:48+00:00): Dank voor de tip, Leo! Maar volgens mij is het hier wel goed gegaan, toch?
Leo Slager (2019-05-15 09:44:10+00:00): Inderdaad, hier is niets beschadigd.
Het was slechts bedoeld als goede raad.
:-)
gscholz (2019-09-28 07:41:05+00:00): Hi,
this changeset has created a rather big mess in the osm database regarding errors of a broken Laguna Alalay relation:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-66.13620&lat=-17.40804&zoom=16

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70252905

Are you going to fix this?

Guido
5m4u9 (2019-09-30 22:33:43+00:00): fixed
Hans Thompson (2019-05-16 17:15:59+00:00): great edit!
Vinber (2019-05-15 09:49:36+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

à plus
PT-53 (2019-05-21 11:15:57+00:00): Hallo Uzumak,
der Irrgarten ist auf dem Luftbild im Geoportal BW nur noch als Gebüsch zu erkennen. Er wird wohl nicht mehr gepflegt. Auch konnte ich auf der Homepage der Stadt Wangen keinen Hinweis zum Irrgarten finden. Ich habe den Eintrag daher ebenfalls gelöscht.
Grüße
ma-rt-in (2019-05-15 08:37:17+00:00): Hallo,
deine Änderungen für PT sehen gut aus. Jedoch gehört das ref an Node 5405905847 nicht ins route_ref sondern ins ref, bzw loc_ref. Denn das A ist ja eine Kennzeichnung der Haltestellen Reihenfolge vor Ort.
vg
dmfr (2024-09-14 21:59:31+00:00): Olá! Pode clarificar se esse nome "Rampa do Pacemaker" está inscrito em alguma placa, ou se se trata de um nome local? Seria melhor colocar esse nome como um alt_name de uma secção da "Rua da Portela"?
jdalima (2024-11-07 15:47:21+00:00): Boa tarde

Bom apontamento, alterei o nome em conformidade.
abakus_uploader (2019-05-15 22:30:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2019-05-14 22:08:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
patervatebre (2019-05-14 22:41:29+00:00): Please split your changesets into smaller more localised groups.
Verdy_p (2019-05-14 22:44:36+00:00): it was VERDY small, but interrupted by edit conflicts in the Netherlands (Europe).
It was intended in a small part of Saint-Martin.
Resolving edit conflicts can make edits much larger than expected
Verdy_p (2019-05-14 22:45:53+00:00): Notably becaue when resolving them (I detect validation errors in edits from others: I revalidate then to fix holes and this makes edits elsewhere, notably by countries)
Initially it was only in France overseas.
tux67 (2019-05-15 06:37:21+00:00): Prima, das sieht gut aus - ich hab' jetzt nur noch mal den fixme aktualisiert. Das ist praktisch ein Korrekturhinweis von Mappern für Mapper
viloan (2019-05-14 22:52:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
tux67 (2019-05-15 09:09:04+00:00): Sorry - immer noch nicht ganz - die Aufzählung nach dem letzten ";" muss mit "," getrennt werden (Wochenende wäre Sa-Su ) - ich hab' das mal angepasst
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70255061
iriman (2019-09-01 15:15:06+00:00): Hello,
Almost always we do not need to create a tunnel while there is a bridge over the road.  
more info: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:bridge

related to way 690076050 and some others.

thank you!
ma-rt-in (2019-05-15 08:31:32+00:00): Hallo,
verwende doch bitte natural=water statt waterway=riverbank. Letzteres ist das neue Tagging-Schema.
vg
keujfl839237 (2019-05-19 11:58:57+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70296615. This isn't an intermittent stream either, but a former landslide. While waterway=drystream may be an unclear tag, there is a clear difference to waterway=stream + intermittent=yes, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrystream. Are there some other waterway=drystream you retagged to waterway=stream + intermittent=yes?
muralito (2019-05-15 15:40:15+00:00): Este tramo ya estaba flechado y se mantiene flechado hacia el sur. El otro tramo ya estaba flechado en OSM desde hace un tiempo, porque la resolucion de IMM ya estaba, aunque faltaban colocar la señalizacion, lo mismo que Santiago Gadea y Talcahuano.
Gustavo Jorge (2019-05-15 15:53:59+00:00): Perfecto. Como vi que la resolución solo mencionaba desde Hugo Antuña hacia el sur, pensé que quizás había un error. Perdón por no saberlo. saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-15 00:17:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70255764 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-15 00:17:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 70255731.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-15 00:37:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70255979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-15 00:37:03+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 70255901.
skquinn (2019-05-28 05:43:42+00:00): Hi,

In case you are new to adding brand new roads to OSM, names should be spelled out, not abbreviated (i.e. "Seabiscuit Boulevard" not "Seabiscuit Blvd") as it causes problems with some text-to-speech software (including navigation programs which speak the directions).

Also you have this commented as "Tavola" but a good portion of these edits are actually in Lilliput Farms to the north. It would have been more helpful to see "Updated road layout in Tavola and Lilliput Farms subdivisions" or similar.
viloan (2019-05-15 01:44:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-05-15 01:50:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DavidKewley (2019-05-19 00:44:21+00:00): It looks like this changeset mostly removed gnis:*, import_uuid, and is_in tags from a lot of towns, cities, etc. What's the reasoning for doing this?
Joseph E (2019-05-19 11:32:25+00:00): My goal was to check all of the towns/cities in the area to make sure that they were tagged properly. I removed the import_uuid and gnis:* tags because I don't think they have any use, other than showing that the node was imported? Since I reviewed the nodes, I think the import tags can be removed.
philippec (2019-08-11 20:46:41+00:00): Ik zal het op indoor zetten.
M!dgard (2019-08-21 09:41:22+00:00): Ah ja, zeer goed. Ik was het vergeten.
philippec (2019-12-01 19:52:28+00:00): Ik heb het vandaag gefotografeerd.
De AED staat binnen de gevellijn.
Ik pas het aan.
skquinn (2019-05-15 15:40:00+00:00): Good work, thanks for catching a couple that I missed/botched.
BCNorwich (2020-02-08 09:43:09+00:00): Hi,
I only just noticed this addition to OSM.
The added Way: 690088314 is not a highway=residential it's a short graveled drive to a single house, the same as many along Unthank Road. Further you mapped it crossing a footpath with no join and also crossing the outline of the house.
I think you mapped it when you joined OSM so probably you were relatively inexperienced.
Anyway on the three counts it's incorrect so I've made amendments to bring it to OSM expectations.
Regards Bernard.
dvvuyyur (2020-02-10 07:25:03+00:00): Hi BC Norwich,
Thanks for taking the time to review my edit and making necessary changes. We will make sure such mistakes will not be repeated. Please let me know in case of any more modifications. I am so grateful to learn from the community.

Regards,
dvvuyyur.
mbethke (2019-05-22 03:56:29+00:00): Hi,
isn't "Asia Blue Scuba" a dive shop?
robert (2019-05-20 21:38:36+00:00): You deleted "Wessex Court" in this edit didn't add the name back to the replacement way. This has broken a match against OS Locator: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=957117
jojoyal (2019-07-11 10:17:02+00:00): Hi robert,

 The edit was made as per the latest image available. It is not sure whether the same name still exists or not. Please let me know what to do in this scenario. 
1. Can we align the same road that was offset?
2. Create a new road and add a note here so that local users may fix it?

Regards,
jojoyal.
viloan (2019-05-15 02:49:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
snitch (2019-05-16 07:40:42+00:00): Please don't remove the "source"="PGS" tag after just partially improving the coastline.
Tauntaun (2019-05-16 08:06:44+00:00): I am planning on continuing my work here so the coastline will be updated. Thank you for the information though, in the future I will try to only remove that tag when my work is finished.
muralito (2019-05-15 15:00:57+00:00): Hola 11000matias.

Cuando pidas que te revisen los cambios "review_request=yes" ayuda que los cambios sean mas chicos y que en el comentario describas lo que quisiste hace con el cambio.

Lo vi por arriba y en general me parecio bien. Una de las cosas que creo se podrian mejorar es lo de la Plaza San Martin. 

En OSM por cada elemento de la realidad va un elemento de OSM. Por eso quizas debera haber un solo leisure=park y no los 3 que habia. Deje solo uno, y mapee el parking subterraneo de otra forma. Faltan las salidas peatonales del parking...
HubMiner (2019-06-16 02:16:03+00:00): Hi, please review your tagging process: Fradillio's Hot Dogs is not in operation for few years, and it was tagged as "was:amenity=fast_food".  I will update the node.
user_115918 (2019-06-16 03:22:04+00:00): I'm not entirely sure how I did that. Thanks for the fix. You should avoid setting was:amenity though as that's not an approved tag for vacant locations. It gives it the appearance of still being a thing at first glance and is going to be displayed by map apps as a current location.
FraukeLeo (2024-05-31 06:09:30+00:00): Hi thetornado76, bei https://osm.org/node/2506047504 sehe ich keinen Überweg und finde es geradezu gefährlich, die Bundesstraße im Abbiegebereich über die Sperrfläche zu überqueren. Was dagegen, wenn ich das in den Daten abbaue?
thetornado76 (2024-05-31 07:14:25+00:00): Hallo Frauke,
Der ursprüngliche Weg ist nicht von mir. Ich hatte damals nur die Tags angepasst. Auf den Mapillary Bildern kann auf die schnelle auch keinen Überweg erkennen und denke dass diese Stelle zum überqueren gefährlich ist. Du kannst es gerne umbauen.
FraukeLeo (2024-05-31 08:06:25+00:00): Ja, dass der Weg schon älter ist, hab ich gesehen. Ich nehm ihn weg. Danke!
mavl (2019-11-08 18:31:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
tordans (2019-05-15 04:56:20+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1770852
CloCkWeRX (2019-05-16 07:14:12+00:00): This one probably shouldn't be in the middle of the road, are you able to adjust where it is?

Given an airbnb is a private house usually, it's probably better to simply add this as an address
ernestoandolfi (2019-05-19 18:42:05+00:00): Ciao. Qualche dubbio: nel commento scrivi che metti mano a sentieri ma poi usi il tag delle pedonali e delle creuze: footway invece che path. 
Inoltre: crossing 	marked   e
footway 	crossing sono tag da incroci pedonali. Ci sono? Di norma poi sono o su un nodo o sul pezzettino della pedonale dove ci sono le strisce. Non su tutto un percorso lungo.
tactile_paving = no a mio parere ci sta se vi possa essere il  dubbio che sia una pedonale attrezzata per non vedenti, altrimenti .... comunque non che sia sbagliato.
kerb = no  è un tag che non conosco ma mi sembra di capire che si riferisca al rialzo fra pedonale/sentiero e strada/marciapiede. Ma qui ci sta?
Già che ci siamo già scritti mi permetto di scriverti qui. Come ti ho detto non sono espertissimo e potrei sbagliare. Un caro saluto. Ciao.
canfe (2019-05-17 14:20:23+00:00): Purtroppo in note non si può mettere il carattere "a capo", OSMOSE segnala errore.
Ho corretto io, ma ritrovo questo errore spesso.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-15 06:17:30+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:45:53+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
ebraplmap (2019-05-24 16:47:23+00:00): Please leave a comment to explain why you are deleting POI data, with a link as a proof of that.
Константин Гам (2019-05-17 11:15:14+00:00): Кто вам дал право удалять дорожки видимые на любом спутниковом снимке? Они реально существуют. И даже если туда запрещён доступ, это не повод их стирать!
dooley (2019-05-16 10:36:50+00:00): Hallo 98Ujm,

du hast wohl aus Versehen in Mettenheim bei den Adressen die PLZ und den Ort vertauscht. Könntest du das bitte korrigieren?

https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/map#15/49.7379/8.3287/osm-wrongcity-abdeckung_minimal

Danke und Gruß, dooley
98Ujm (2019-05-16 10:57:39+00:00): Oh ja, vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ich hab es behoben!
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-15 07:18:18+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
GOwin (2019-05-15 08:38:49+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

You seem to be adding refutable data in this changeset. Do you need any help?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70261440
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-15 07:18:16+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
domainpestcontrol (2019-05-15 07:21:13+00:00): This account is monitored, my email address is checked on a daily basis. We have a number of listings on GMB, Yellowpages, Yelp. They all have the same info as this one.
Let me know what bothers you.