piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2021-01-23 09:56:45+00:00): OSM Kozhikode,

please stop further mapping and fix the previous edits before continuing. You keep using different tags for the Akshaya ref codes! In this changeset you used uniQUE ID, in the previous one Unique ID ecc.
user_5359 (2021-01-24 08:40:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add a Internet cafe twice! Don't not existing buildings! Please user standard keys. I revert your entry
DaxServer (2021-01-23 11:32:00+00:00): Revert from https://osmcha.org/changesets/91607599
viswachaitanya (2021-02-05 09:52:35+00:00): Hey! Looks like these cannot be links way 471351559.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98011598
DaxServer (2021-02-05 11:01:05+00:00): Heya! I honestly do not know which classification these links go to. If you are on OSMIndia Telegram, would you like to post your opinions and see what others would say? https://t.me/OSMIndia
Alkinator (2021-01-23 16:13:21+00:00): ما السبب
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 13:44:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108531843 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from the Thailand OSM community, reverting some well-meaning but poor-quality edits from a few months ago (mapper long gone).
Karthoo (2021-03-30 19:46:02+00:00): Hallo jengelh,
An https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3340432625 hast du das Tag "yes=no" verwendet. Kommt mir ehrlich gesagt etwas paradox vor - könntest du das vielleicht verbessern? ;-)
jengelh (2021-03-30 20:14:04+00:00): War wohl ein Fall von
https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/028/596/dsmGaKWMeHXe9QuJtq_ys30PNfTGnMsRuHuo_MUzGCg.jpg
EinKonstanzer (2021-10-23 20:14:18+00:00): Es gab hier schon die Diskussion ob das tatsächlich privat ist. Denn Privat heißt nicht, daß keine Nutzung erlaubt ist! Wie sieht denn die Beschilderung aus?
DaxServer (2021-01-23 11:28:22+00:00): Reverted edits from
1. https://osmcha.org/changesets/91054285
2. https://osmcha.org/changesets/91050541
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98012333
ivanbranco (2021-01-23 10:01:54+00:00): Hi OSM Kozhikode,

you wrongly added an Akshaya Centre in Ireland
ivanbranco (2021-01-23 10:05:58+00:00): *and with this edit you deleted all the tags, leaving only a line, I will revert to the initial situation
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
PeeWee32 (2021-02-23 17:08:47+00:00): Hoi Maarten

Highway waarde is niet juist.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6743437/history

Groet
Peter
Maarten Deen (2021-02-23 18:24:32+00:00): Dank je wel, gefixed. JOSM autocomplete error.
moonraver (2025-06-06 19:23:26+00:00): zdravim, chcem sa len opytat ci je treba mat "fixme" ktore ide cez cely region a niekolko miest? Nedalo by sa to nejako okresat len na usek,ktoreho sa to tyka (a teda nie na celu route)? na mape to dost zavadza, ked mapujem a nevidiet potom ine fixme. Dik za odpoved.
milosha (2025-06-07 06:43:16+00:00): to je riadne stare fixme, uz snad nie je relevantne, dal tom ho prec.
532910 (2021-01-23 21:59:19+00:00): какой источник этих данных?
Sancheslee (2021-01-24 00:30:32+00:00): работаю на территории, никаких дискотек там нет, чушь какую то придумали
eggie (2021-01-24 08:49:22+00:00): Dag MurMure
Tja....  Maar een hek kan vaak open. 
Een hek betekent niet verboden toegang. 
Je zou er foot=permissive van kunnen maken als er geen borden staan met  Verboden toegang. Dan routeert in ieder geval de wandelroute weer.
MVG
eggie
s8evq (2021-01-23 15:52:52+00:00): Dag JosV. Ik zag dat je addr:housename toevoegde in deze changeset. Ik geloof niet dat dit correct is, housename wordt niet gebruikt in Belgie (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr#Tags_for_individual_houses) PS: op zich is het niet fout, maar addr:city en addr:postcode is ook niet nodig om toe te voegen. Dit wordt afgeleid uit het gebied waarin het gebouw ligt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98014058
Max-Kritic (2021-01-26 13:23:07+00:00): Pas de majuscule dans les addr:city !

voir http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/BURN-OUT
SekeRob (2021-01-23 11:46:01+00:00): Great find this bus stop as the Moovit routing map and stop instructions were incomplete, never figured out where bus 14 was going before ending the route at Largo della Chiesa.. network=TUA, operator=GTM, route_ref=14, waste_basket=yes, lit=yes (a bus stop has a bunch of tags :O)

Have a great day.
FinixFighter (2021-01-23 22:10:04+00:00): Thank you so much for adding important tags! :D Nice job.
532910 (2021-01-23 21:58:41+00:00): какой источник этих данных?
Sancheslee (2021-01-24 01:27:53+00:00): работаю тут 3ий год
woodpeck (2021-01-26 22:58:50+00:00): This changeset and others referring to the same data import have been reverted. Please understand that there are procedures to follow if you want to import data. Your import was buggy, the data was unsuitable for OSM. A prior discussion, as mandated by the import guidelines, would have helped to avoid the problems. Next time please discuss your imports with the community before you go ahead.
eggie (2021-01-23 12:05:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
tastrax (2021-01-27 10:08:55+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
MikeN (2021-05-03 11:53:08+00:00): Hi, why were these streets set to private?   There are no gates shown on Bing Street view.  There is a "private subdivision" sign, but the sign does not say "private, keep out".  Most subdivisions could be described as private.
amarajz (2021-05-04 05:37:11+00:00): Hi,

There is a gate at other end,  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6536980167 and a private community sign board at John Dodd Road intersection. Considering these facts, combined with our driver feedback we have made roads as private. Please let us know otherwise, we will make changes accordingly. We believe roads are meant for residents of community and not for general public. Happy to learn from local community.   

Regards,
amarajz
ChehrehBargi (2021-11-13 15:53:33+00:00): سلام
ضمن خسته نباشید
تگ خالی از سکنه برای نامگذاری تقاطع صحیح نیست
Hufkratzer (2022-06-19 09:28:07+00:00): Inside of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899131558 (Centro Hípico da Paiâ) you seem to have mapped a large riding arena (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899131575) with is tagged leisure=horse_riding too; so now you have 2 nested riding centres (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding) there what doesn't make sense. The large riding arena should probably be retagged to leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena).

(Recently added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389588277 (Volteio) should probably also be retagged to leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian).
Reino Baptista (2022-06-19 14:52:48+00:00): Hi,
I agree completely. 
Would you mind to proceed with the changes you mentioned, since I will be away from my computer for the next couple of days.
Thank you,
RB
Hufkratzer (2022-06-19 16:22:13+00:00): Thanks for the quick response.

It is not urgent, and I would prefer if you do that yourself when your time will allow it because I assume that you know these places (and I don't).

And here is something additional:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304594155 is tagged with leisure=pitch but is probably a good candidate for leisure=horse_riding, compare http://equicampo.com/centro-equestre.html
axelr (2021-01-23 13:31:48+00:00): Die Kreuzung Uhlandstraße / Matthias-Claudius-Straße ist ein Miniroundabout.
Warum änderst du wie wild Kreisverkehre? Deine Changesetkommentare sind nach wie vor nichtssagend. Du reagierst nicht auf Changeset - Kommentare, wartest du nur bis zur ersten Sperre?
tastrax (2021-01-27 10:01:45+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
datendelphin (2021-01-24 18:45:13+00:00): Das layer=1 ist nicht gut. Das heisst so viel wie die Strasse geht über das Haus drüber. Besser den Teil des Gebäudes abtrennen, der nur ein Dach ist und entsprechend tagen.
folle (2021-01-24 19:01:58+00:00): Hallo datendelphin, vielen Dank für Deinen Input! Das ist natürlich falsch. Als ich die Strasse ergänzt habe, habe ich etwas voreilig den Vorschlag von der Website übernommen. Das Wording war alles andere als eindeutig ... Ich habe nun Punke am Anfang und Ende vom Dach ergänzt und nur die Linie unter dem Dach als "überdacht" gekennzeichnet. Ich hoffe es stimmt jetzt!?!
datendelphin (2021-01-24 19:21:09+00:00): Nich ganz. Ich würde das so mappen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98071317 einfach building=roof, die Strasse geht darunter durch, und eventuelle Warnungen des editors einfach ignorieren. Der iD editor verleitet leider viel zu stark, irgend was zu korrigieren dass gar nicht falsch ist. Hinschauen lohnt sich bei Warnungen, aber es gibt viele false positives und die darf man einfach ignorieren. Ich verwende vespucci oder josm
folle (2021-01-24 19:49:44+00:00): Vielen Dank! Für manche Sachen verwende ich auch josm, aber wenn ich nur "kleine" Änderungen mache, dann mache ich es online. Jetzt kommt eben diese komische Frage: Zufahrtsweg kreuzt Dach, das ist darüber, das ist darunter. Habe ich gerade falschrum interpretiert. Das nächste mal mache ich, wie Du vorgeschlagen hast, nochmals vielen Dank!
datendelphin (2021-01-24 20:09:35+00:00): Danke dir auch für die guten Beiträge. Viel Spass beim mappen
MxxCon (2021-01-23 21:36:59+00:00): Hello.
Please note that OpenStreetMap edit comments is NOT a place to post advertisement messages!
Additionally, your edit modified a name for what appears to be a private residential house. That doesn't seem to be correct.
olo81 (2021-01-31 19:19:24+00:00): nie przyklejamy obszarów do dróg, ciągów pieszych!  przyklejenie jest proste ale rozdzielanie to masakra. A jak przychodzi edytowanie dróg i ich cięcie to można łatwo popsuć obszary. 
Z nazwami nie ma co przesadzać, dałeś drugą do osobnego tagu a mimo to w głównym dwie nazwy :/  
Nie nazywamy wszystkiego na siłę, jeśli nie znamy nazwy odpuszczamy. Nie wszystko musi mieć nazwę.
C2oc4 (2021-02-01 10:16:46+00:00): Owy park jest raz nazywany park wątpię a raz park koszelew stad podwójna nazwa załączyłem dokumenty jak go edytowałem tzn linki
Futur3r (2021-01-23 12:54:45+00:00): Salut, j'ai pas édité beaucoup de voie de bus mais le wiki spécifie que le tag service=bus est une erreur. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dbus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98018042
KPull (2021-01-23 13:24:02+00:00): You've changed Pjazza Tritoni to a landuse=grass. I don't think this is appropriate since Pjazza Tritoni is a paved, pedestrianized area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98018485
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
GinaroZ (2021-01-29 18:14:06+00:00): Is there any particular reason why you deleted all these features?
user_2066394 (2021-01-23 15:40:06+00:00): Die Sparkassen-Filiale liegt aktuell auf diesem Knoten und ist mit disused:*=* markiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/180371619

Hintergrund ist die Schließung von Filialen:
https://www.kreisbote.de/lokales/fuerstenfeldbruck/wegen-corona-sparkasse-schliesst-im-landkreis-ffb-voruebergehend-neun-filialen-90153787.html

Geldautomat ist nach wie vor hier eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8322514223

Ist die Filiale tatsächlich wieder geöffnet (mit Filialbetrieb)?
Silence37 (2021-01-23 16:15:36+00:00): Das mit dem disused scheine ich noch nicht so recht raus zu haben :-(. 
Habe den Eintrag Sparkasse deshalb übersehen.
Dachte die Filiale ist hier noch nicht eingetragen. Hat mich etwas verwirrt. Sonst verhält es sich so wie in dem verlinkten Artikel. Filiale ist vorübergehend geschlossen. Nur die Service-Geräte sind verfügbar.

Habe den Punkt wieder entfernt da er sonst doppelt wäre.
Atal Hikr (2023-05-20 13:50:30+00:00): Buongiorno. Posso chiedere quale è a fonte per il toponimo Brusin? Sulle mappe a me note è riportato Busin e anche l'uso locale mi risulta sia Busin, senza la r.
openpablo3 (2023-05-20 17:31:48+00:00): Grazie per la segnalazione, è un errore d'inserimento. Corretto.
literan (2021-01-23 16:37:59+00:00): не надо ОРАТЬ
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
Waldbad Lamspringe (2021-01-23 17:20:26+00:00): Daten sind richtig. Bitte übernehmen.
berndw (2021-01-23 17:49:31+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Was soll übernommen werden?

Das Rendern der Karte geht automatisch, also ist nur etwas Geduld vonnöten

Bernd
Waldbad Lamspringe (2021-01-23 18:52:48+00:00): Guten Tag Bernd, 
vielen Dank! 
Wir hatten angeklickt: "Ich will meine Bearbeitungen von jemandem überprüfen lassen." Obwohl wir uns bei den Daten natürlich komplett sicher sind. Also muss es nicht noch extra bestätigt werden?
Wie lange dauert die Anpassung der Daten in etwa?
Herzliche Grüße aus Lamspringe
berndw (2021-01-24 08:26:11+00:00): Hallo
damit wünscht ihr nur ein Feedback ob eure Änderungen in Ordnung sind, das ist keine Blockade ;-)

Und die Kontrolle ist eine Freiwilligenaufgabe, die macht irgendjemand dem es auffällt und mit passender Motivation.

Ich habe nur die Layerangaben der Rutsche korrigiert, die sind in einem früheren Changeset gesetzt worden.

Leider kann ich nicht sagen, wie genau die Hintergrundbilder in eurer Region sind, da einen ziemlichen Versatz des ganzen Bades zwischen BING und ESRI gibt.
Das solltet ihr bei Gelegenheit prüfen, wenn offizielle Daten verfügbar sein sollten

Weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen und beim Schwimmen

Bernd
berndw (2021-01-24 08:27:13+00:00): Das Rendern der Karte dauert unterschiedlich lang, je nach Serverlast. 
Momentan sind die Zeiten kurz

Bernd
Waldbad Lamspringe (2021-01-24 10:58:51+00:00): Lieber Bernd, vielen Dank für die Infos! :)
Beste Grüße aus Lamspringe
turepalsson (2022-07-22 06:48:54+00:00): Did you really intend to change the name of a residential area in Sweden?
Colin Smale (2021-01-23 15:22:49+00:00): just a quick comment... please note that parish and other council boundaries (boundary=administrative) are defined by law, and the OS data is pretty much by definition correct. Suburbs are a different concept, and the boundaries tend to be fuzzy on occasions. So please carry on with the suburbs, but don't "fiddle" with the admin boundaries unless you have a source at least as good as the OS! Thanks
rising-mistake (2021-01-23 15:32:20+00:00): Yep, will do, I tried to avoid changing the boundary=administrative ways but I see now that I accidentally changed Risinghurst and Sandhills. Thanks for changing it back, I'll be more careful to review that I haven't changed them in future :)
pbnoxious (2021-01-25 08:55:04+00:00): Weil ich da gerade drüber gestolpert bin: Gibt es einen Grund dass du hier einen neuen "Way" für den Wald rund um den Parkplatz angelegt hast und nicht einfach das kleine Stück Wald mit in den (existierenden) angrenzenden Wald genommen hast?
Wenn nein, würde ich das mal noch dazu packen, sieht für mich nach dem gleichen Wald aus ;-)
marczoutendijk (2022-02-01 10:08:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754021788
surface=7 is puzzling. What should it be?
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-24 13:12:04+00:00): Ciao. Una highway=track con motor_vehicle=no è abbastanza dubbiosa perché le track sono strade ad uno agricolo o forestale (quindi ad esempio i trattori ci possono passare). Inoltre, dovresti usare mtb:name e non name per i nomi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98022092
Black Devil (2021-01-24 16:52:09+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
modifica effettuata e mi scuso.
Effettivamente si tratta di sentiero e non di track.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gianni
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-24 13:12:30+00:00): Ciao. Una highway=track con motor_vehicle=no è abbastanza dubbiosa perché le track sono strade ad uno agricolo o forestale (quindi ad esempio i trattori ci possono passare). Inoltre, dovresti usare mtb:name e non name per i nomi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98022243
Black Devil (2021-01-24 16:52:41+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
modifica effettuata e mi scuso.
Effettivamente si tratta di sentiero e non di track.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gianni
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-24 13:12:54+00:00): Ciao. Una highway=track con motor_vehicle=no è abbastanza dubbiosa perché le track sono strade ad uno agricolo o forestale (quindi ad esempio i trattori ci possono passare). Inoltre, dovresti usare mtb:name e non name per i nomi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98022364
Black Devil (2021-01-24 16:53:02+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
modifica effettuata e mi scuso.
Effettivamente si tratta di sentiero e non di track.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gianni
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-24 13:14:07+00:00): Ciao. Una highway=track con motor_vehicle=no è abbastanza dubbiosa perché le track sono strade ad uno agricolo o forestale (quindi ad esempio i trattori ci possono passare). Inoltre, dovresti usare mtb:name e non name per i nomi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98022420
Black Devil (2021-01-24 16:53:43+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
modifica effettuata e mi scuso.
Effettivamente si tratta di sentiero e non di track.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gianni
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-24 13:14:37+00:00): Ciao. Una highway=track con motor_vehicle=no è abbastanza dubbiosa perché le track sono strade ad uno agricolo o forestale (quindi ad esempio i trattori ci possono passare). Inoltre, dovresti usare mtb:name e non name per i nomi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98022506
Black Devil (2021-01-24 16:53:57+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
modifica effettuata e mi scuso.
Effettivamente si tratta di sentiero e non di track.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gianni
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-24 13:15:01+00:00): Ciao. Una highway=track con motor_vehicle=no è abbastanza dubbiosa perché le track sono strade ad uno agricolo o forestale (quindi ad esempio i trattori ci possono passare). Inoltre, dovresti usare mtb:name e non name per i nomi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98022572
Black Devil (2021-01-24 16:54:15+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
modifica effettuata e mi scuso.
Effettivamente si tratta di sentiero e non di track.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gianni
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-24 13:15:24+00:00): Ciao. Una highway=track con motor_vehicle=no è abbastanza dubbiosa perché le track sono strade ad uno agricolo o forestale (quindi ad esempio i trattori ci possono passare). Inoltre, dovresti usare mtb:name e non name per i nomi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98022673
Black Devil (2021-01-24 16:54:37+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
modifica effettuata e mi scuso.
Effettivamente si tratta di sentiero e non di track.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gianni
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-24 13:16:20+00:00): Ciao. Una highway=track con motor_vehicle=no è abbastanza dubbiosa perché le track sono strade ad uno agricolo o forestale (quindi ad esempio i trattori ci possono passare). Inoltre, dovresti usare mtb:name e non name per i nomi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98022732
Black Devil (2021-01-24 16:54:54+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
modifica effettuata e mi scuso.
Effettivamente si tratta di sentiero e non di track.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gianni
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-24 13:16:37+00:00): Ciao. Una highway=track con motor_vehicle=no è abbastanza dubbiosa perché le track sono strade ad uno agricolo o forestale (quindi ad esempio i trattori ci possono passare). Inoltre, dovresti usare mtb:name e non name per i nomi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98022793
Black Devil (2021-01-24 16:55:09+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
modifica effettuata e mi scuso.
Effettivamente si tratta di sentiero e non di track.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Gianni
gileri (2021-01-23 15:50:30+00:00): Bonjour, il y avait une voie déplacée par erreur, j'ai annulé ce changeset.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98025463

Pouvez-vous également indiquer vos sources et mettre un message descriptif de vos modifications ?

Merci

Éric
osmviborg (2021-01-23 16:32:41+00:00): Her ville jeg stole mere danmarksadresser.dk end på et over to år gammelt Mapillary billede.
parsd51 (2021-01-24 15:39:58+00:00): Hej osmviborg

Tak for din kommentar.

Tja, gæt kan bringe en langt.

En tilsyneladende lokalkendt fra:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366997525, skriver
Da Klintvej 68 været sat til Bygning "Pavillon A", på den anden side af Fyrrebakkevej, kører alle med GPS forkert og havner et helt andet sted, end ved vores reception, som også har adresse Klintvej 69.

Men det er ikke i CS’en, så kilden er dig nok ukendt.

Det er derfor jeg synes det er vigtigt at dokumentere kilderne i CS, så vi gensidigt kan validere hinandens CS’er, så OSM bliver så opdateret som muligt! Uden at behøve spørge til kilden.

Det er aldrig til at vide hvad de andre ved :-)

Vil du skrive dine kilder på i fremtiden?

Hilsen
parsd51
osmviborg (2021-01-24 16:33:37+00:00): Jeg har set ændringen. "som også har adressen Klintvej 69", skriver manden, og det er noget vrøvl. Den bygning han omtaler ligger på 'Rosenvangen Syd og har intet nummer, huset ligger på samme matrikel som 'Rosenvangen Syd 2'. Jeg er før stødt på ændringer hvor man på eget initiativ opretter adresser. Det her må man gå til kommunen med, for at få en løsning.