piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-03-09 16:19:35+00:00): Kennelijk ziet het Kadaster dit als één gebouw.
Vaak worden die ondergrondse 'garages' apart geïmporteerd.
Er wordt verschillend mee omgegaan.
Zelf zou ik het gebouw afsplitsen en het gehele ondergrondse gebouw intekenen als building:part=yes
layer=-1
amenity=parking
parking=underground.
Dan zal dat deel niet renderen en kun je gewoon de landuse erop tekeken.
Wel kans dat bij een periodieke update de oude vorm terugkomt.
Het is dus schipperen.
building:part  rendert niet als gebouw. 
 

De BAG gegevens.. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Professor%20van%20Weliestraat&resultOffset=0&objectId=0268100000088600&geometry.x=187935.86636654&geometry.y=427219.69121397&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-09 16:29:42+00:00): en dat gebouwtje rechts (in/uitgang) zit weer bovengronds en kan dus dan apart worden ingetekend.
literan (2021-03-09 16:12:20+00:00): рекламный мусор вычистил. и не пытайтесь
literan (2021-03-09 16:13:26+00:00): будете упорствовать во внесении рекламных текстов - вас будет ждать блокировка
literan (2021-03-10 15:29:31+00:00): вы мультиполигон леса сломали этой правкой. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915096371#map=19/56.22534/37.94289 этот контур вы включили в мультик, но и границу вырубки с поселком академиков тоже в нем оставили. Я починил.
mrbaja (2021-03-10 16:20:44+00:00): Хорошо, спасибо. Если лес исчез то это вообще косяк ))). Хорошо , что поправили. А справа в поселке Академиков лес заезжает на садовые участки как вам? Это ведь тоже по-моему не правильно. Полигоны не должны наезжать друг на друга?
literan (2021-03-10 16:29:43+00:00): обычно считается, что полигоны с тегом landuse не должны друг на друга налезать. деревья же на landuse - вполне нормально (если он там, на дачах, есть, конечно). 

например, вот вполне себе древесную растительность отрисовывают в жилом квартале https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/55.70581/37.46909
mrbaja (2021-03-10 16:47:06+00:00): да, тут тоже косяки, на одном из футбольных полей растет лес ))) 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.70712/37.47406
literan (2021-03-10 18:22:12+00:00): ага, плюс площадные объекты (лес) приклеили к линейным (дороги)
sorcrosc (2021-03-09 22:51:16+00:00): It was actually intentional. Nothing to repair.
user_5359 (2021-03-10 02:27:51+00:00): Long version: There was two attribute with the same value mail (typo of email) and contact:pac. I merge the booth keys to contact:email

What is your question / comment to this change set?
sorcrosc (2021-03-10 20:14:40+00:00): The two email addresses are different. One is normal and the other is certified email.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certified_email
Discussion about tagging is ongoing on talk-it mailing list
user_5359 (2021-03-11 05:03:55+00:00): Oh God, my eyes. I apologise for this mistake! I have restored the data and oriented myself according to Taginfo. 

Interestingly, other secured email address systems like https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/De-Mail have not caught on. i only noticed the :pgp addition.
pio2_122 (2021-03-10 09:12:54+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś adres Szczytno 40B (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3238687172/history)?
Zauważyłem, że nie ma go na warstwie KINA, z której pewnie korzystałeś. Jest on jednak widoczny w danych źródłowych z SIPu gminy (http://kampinos.e-mapa.net/).
Cristoffs (2021-03-10 11:12:52+00:00): Tak korzystałem z KINA, musiał mi wyskoczyć w dubletach. Dasz radę na nieść? Będę mógł dopiero wieczorem poprawić.
pio2_122 (2021-03-10 11:32:42+00:00): Dzięki za potwierdzenie.
Adres już przywróciłem :)
rising-mistake (2021-03-12 14:03:52+00:00): Thanks for the fix, my hand must have slipped while typing K6!
Yorvik Prestigitator (2021-03-12 17:32:23+00:00): no problem, I think the K7s were never launched and now only exist in museums.
Ludhiana (2021-04-10 15:05:36+00:00): Some of your buildings don't exist anymore .. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102669271
Fod (2021-03-11 10:47:47+00:00): Hej Ole -
Hvor har du fået informationerne om de nye huse på Teglbakken i Nærheden fra? Jeg kan ikke finde dem på nogle af SDFE's kort.

Venligst,
Jakob
OleVedel (2021-03-11 17:30:37+00:00): Det kan ses i forslag til lokalplan 4.42.14 på HTK's hjemmeside. Kig i referat fra Plan- og Miljøudvalget's møde d. 12 januar.
parsd51 (2021-03-13 15:10:46+00:00): Hej

Bemærk venligst at objekterne i OSM skal være fysisk eller juridisk forankret.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth_and_Official_truth
F.eks. en vedtaget lokalplan.

Objekterne i OSM har en life-cycle som beskrevet her (proposed, construction, ....):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction

Hilsen
parsd51
OleVedel (2021-03-13 19:18:03+00:00): Tak for dit input. Som jeg fortolker det, hører mine ændringer til "Key:proposed", da der foreligger en lokalplan til godkendelse.
parsd51 (2021-03-14 07:28:00+00:00): Som jeg læser wiki’en er det fysiske og juridiske grundlaget for om objekter skal i OSM.
Et lokalplan-forslag er mig bekendt ikke juridisk bindende.

Proposed ser jeg derfor brugt om fysiske objekter som ikke findes i virkeligheden, men som er forankret juridisk, f.eks. i en lokalplan.

En vedtaget lokalplan behøver ikke blive til noget i virkeligheden, det er en mulighed, men ved vedtagelsen er det hensigten at det skal ske.
OleVedel (2021-03-14 07:33:47+00:00): I det her tilfælde bliver det til noget, da der i februar er banket funderingspæle ned de steder hvor bygningerne er planlagt.
parsd51 (2021-03-14 07:48:38+00:00): Ja, så er der jo fysisk grundlag for OSM, selv om der tilsyneladende mangler juridisk.
For mig lyder det du skriver mere som construction, men det er du bedre til at vurdere end mig.
osmviborg (2021-03-14 11:09:00+00:00): Er der en advokat til stede?
parsd51 (2021-03-14 11:20:30+00:00): Jeg ser at området juridisk er dækket af lokalplan 4.42 som rammelokalplan.
Fod (2021-03-15 14:05:19+00:00): D'herrer -

Først: Tak for bidraget, Ole. Det er godt tegnet ind. Jeg har justeret den nøjagtige placering ved hjælp af værktøjet/plugin'en "PicLayer". Det kan jeg anbefale, selv om det kræver lidt øvelse.

Dernæst: Jeg har lige været forbi i dag, og den eneste konstruktion på stedet er ganske rigtigt funderingspælene. De enkelte bygninger er ikke påbegyndet endnu.

Jeg har derfor tilføhet prefixet "proposed:" til bygningerne og tilføjet
source=Høje Taastrup Kommune lokalplan 4.42
og 
check_date=2021-03-15

Så kan man jo ændre til 

construction:building=* (eller building=construction), når husene går i gang med at blive bygget.
OleVedel (2021-03-15 16:28:44+00:00): Tak for opdateringen. 

Måske skulle jeg kigge på PicLayer. Det er ret svært at placere bygningerne korrekt uden et hjælpeværktøj :-)
Fod (2022-02-15 16:29:00+00:00): ...og så er husene i gang med at blive bygget. Jeg har opdateret med building=construction.
iccaldwell (2021-03-10 12:35:43+00:00): Comment should have been "add buddings"
Heinz_V (2021-03-10 14:34:55+00:00): Since you started mapping several mappers wrote a changeset comment.
But it seems you refuse to write any answer. That is at least unpolite.
BCNorwich (2021-03-09 17:35:11+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The road shows on the Maxar imagery so I've tweaked the line a bit to suit.

Regards Bernard.
Carto'Cité (2023-08-11 10:06:46+00:00): Salut patman37,
L'aménagement a été ajouté sans tenir compte de ta contribution sur ce way :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915112685
Je supprime ta contribution mais si tu veux garder l'historique, je peux faire l'inverse et reprendre ton way et supprimer celui qui a été ajouté.
Charles de Carto’Cité
iandees (2021-03-09 17:12:29+00:00): Once again, please don't delete existing buildings and redraw them. Improve the existing data first.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100723857
kylebakerpa05 (2021-03-09 17:18:40+00:00): Can you please read the message I sent you on your change set, thank you
!bm (2021-03-10 20:34:55+00:00): Hallo Medienservice Marzahn,

phone und website waren bereits unter den entsprechenden contact:*-Tags erfasst, daher habe ich diese einfachen wieder entfernt.

--besteGrüße!bm
trigpoint (2021-03-11 12:44:19+00:00): Hi
I am wondering why you have deleted the station=site tag here?

Cheers Phil
EPea (2021-03-11 13:53:10+00:00): When I looked at the map it showed as a station, which it isn't. Maybe I've completely misunderstood what the point of the map is but it was misleading as it was
kylebakerpa05 (2021-03-09 17:14:09+00:00): Now there are building over building can you please fix that. I’m not going to delete anymore anyways and please don’t delete the ones with information like addresses already in it, I took me a while trying to get those as I had to visit the area myself.
eggie (2021-03-09 20:58:14+00:00): Mr Noolas.. Beter geen access=no op voetpaden.
In bijna alle gevallen is dat fout.
MVG
eggie
mrNoolas (2021-03-10 09:30:27+00:00): Wat zou hier beter zijn? Juridisch gezien is het natuurlijk verboden om dit pad te nemen: er staan een paar grote "verboden voor voetgangers" borden, maar toch doen veel mensen het.
eggie (2021-03-10 10:01:46+00:00): foot=no zou dan correct zijn.
Maar fietsen zal ook wel niet zijn toegestaan. Dus access=no zal ook heel goed kunnen.
Je had het dus goed getagd. 

Van de verbinding zou je dan highway=path kunnen maken.
Het zal niet bedoeld zijn als wandelpad. 
We taggen gewoon wat de borden aangeven... Niet wat het publiek doet. :)

MVG
eggie
Piskvor (2021-03-19 13:30:19+00:00): Ahoj, opravil jsem ty dvojí koleje: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101332944

Mapovat silnici a koleje v ní jako zvlášť cesty je jeden z možných přístupů (a asi i detailnější), ale je pak ještě potřeba ty koleje odtagovat z té silnice (aby tam v mapě nevznikla jakoby dvojkolejná trať, jedna kolej v silnici a druhá vedle, kde je ve skutečnosti jen jedna kolej), a pokud možno ještě ji označit jako embedded_rails=, viz třeba tady: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919179396

Zdar, Piškvor
SomeoneElse (2023-04-22 21:57:35+00:00): Hello John,
I wonder if the surface=grass on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888252222 was supposed to be somewhere else?
Cheers,
Andy
John Stanworth (2023-04-23 06:21:21+00:00): :) Yes! Thanks. I’ve deleted it because I can’t remember which path it was meant for. Don’t hesitate to change or revert any other bonkers mistakes. John.
Bexhill-OSM (2021-03-10 03:38:34+00:00): Unfortunately some of that aerial imagery is unaligned and knocks some adjacent places out.  I'll try and correct it.
Bexhill-OSM (2021-03-10 04:10:40+00:00): Okay, I've fixed the alignment problems, and kept all the features you've added. Cheers.
Vinber-Pro (2021-03-19 17:13:14+00:00): Bonjour Fost',
quelques points :
- opening_hours est à supprimer, il doit être "codé" avec les horaires effectifs (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours)
- pour renseigner le fait que le lieu est "réservé" aux adhérents, tu peux noter access=private
- la note est plutôt à mettre dans une description

Bonne cartographie
Fost OT Seignanx (2021-03-19 17:46:43+00:00): Bonjour Vinber-Pro,
Je vais faire les changements de ce pas ! C'était une de mes premières modif je n'avais pas voulu toucher aux attributs déjà rentrés par d'autres...
Merci pour ces précisions carto !
Andrea Musuruane (2021-03-10 08:38:36+00:00): Ciao. Hai inserito un percorso senza etichette e non collegato ad altri sentieri. Ho provveduto ad aggiungere highway=path e a collegarlo. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100725594
Andrea Musuruane (2021-03-10 08:37:53+00:00): Ciao. Hai inserito un percorso senza etichette e non collegato ad altri sentieri. Ho provveduto ad aggiungere highway=path e a collegarlo. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100725779
syntex (2021-03-09 18:21:16+00:00): : /
eggie (2021-03-09 18:31:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedback  Elk begin is moeilijk...
Je Julianakerk staat al gemapt op de kaart. Dat hoeft niet nog een keer. De kerk heb ik verwijderd.
Je voetpad 'moet' nog een verbinding krijgen met de Vijgendam.
Het voetpad (noord zuidstuk)bij de Eenvoudlaan is wwllicht een highway = service  service=alley ?  Er staan auto's.


MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-03-09 18:42:27+00:00): Voetpad omgezet  in  highway=service service=alley Kijk je nog even naar de Vijgendam?

MVG
eggie
Suijker (2021-03-09 18:54:14+00:00): Will do! Dankjewel.
eggie (2021-03-09 20:23:27+00:00): Top.. Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie
eggie (2021-03-09 18:40:01+00:00): Dag SuijkerR
Tip: Je kunt aan zo'n parkeerplaatsje ook access=private toevoegen. Dan rendert de P minder prominent. 
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2024-05-04 09:15:34+00:00): Hi Jez,

you added 6 trees with height=stump,
would you agree to remove the height and change them to natural=tree_stump?

thanks and good mapping :)
Jez Nicholson (2024-05-04 09:53:38+00:00): Thank you. Done. As you can probably tell, this is my local neighborhood and micro mapping playground
Yorvik Prestigitator (2021-03-26 02:44:01+00:00): Are you sure the spelling of royal cypher on IG8 39D?
There weren't any post boxes in the time of George 4th - did you mean George the 6th?
WalthamCity (2021-03-26 05:42:21+00:00): Thanks for spotting this! Fortunately I took a photo of the box and have just double checked. It was actually a very degraded EVIIR cypher. Will update!
PT-53 (2021-03-10 09:14:38+00:00): Hallo Jorisbo,
ich verstehe den Sinn Deiner Ergänzung
access=destination
an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40584511/history
nicht. 
Welches Verkehrszeichen steht denn dort bzw. was ist die Quelle für Deine Ergänzung.
Grüße
PT-53 (2021-03-10 09:20:54+00:00): Warum hast Du diese öffentliche Zufahrt zum Lorettohof von unclassified auf service + driveway heruntergestuft?
Das entspricht ganz sicher nicht der tatsächlichen Verkehrsbedeutung.
Und was soll die Drehung bei access von private; agricultural auf agricultural;privat?
Fragende Grüße
Jorisbo (2021-03-10 09:55:46+00:00): Hi PT-53 !  I was triggerd because af the extra space between the multivalue access. That was the reason for the edit.
I did not see it also switched the values. That is of no interest off course. It would be nice if we avoid using mutivalues anyway but that is as different story.
I reversed the driveway back intof unclassified the way it was before.
The access=destination tag indicates access for everybody but not to be used as the common route, that would be the main highway.
Thank you for mentioning. Kind regards, Joris
PT-53 (2021-03-10 10:14:00+00:00): Hallo Jorisbo, 
es ist bei uns in der Gegend nicht üblich, Parkplatz-Zufahrten mit
access=destination
zu markieren.
P-Zufahrten werden bei uns mit
highway=service
und meist mit dem Zusatz
service=parking_aisle
markiert.
Beispiele:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8589624#map=19/48.21080/9.49863
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29363068
Grüße
Tunturikyy (2021-03-11 18:48:51+00:00): Kangasalan suuntaan ei ole pysäkkiä Isolukko, joten poistin sen reitiltä 40A Keskustori => jne. Pysäkki Isolukko on kohdassa vain Tampereen suuntaan.
lostmike (2021-03-10 12:09:27+00:00): Regarding the Health Centre car park.  IIRC The car park bit isn't one way, only the service road around the back of the building.
tech_pixie (2021-03-11 21:35:18+00:00): Yes, you are totally correct. Bad wording on my part for the changeset comment - I actually only changed the direction for the short section directly outside the pharmacy and didn't even notice the incorrect one-way in the upper car park. I'll change it now and add the car park areas to the lower part. Out of interest - do you somehow monitor for changes in an area so you know when I/others change things? Or is it just looking at the changesets for nearby users under your profile? If there is a way to be notified I'd be interested as Amazon have a team that are adding driveways etc from their driver data and I sometimes I think their definitions of track/driveway could be improved with local knowledge of a particular area.
lostmike (2021-03-12 09:44:37+00:00): Glad to help.  As for change monitoring I use a local install of whodidit. The original one at https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/ was broken for a while but has now been fixed again.  I just really monitor Pembrokeshire as that's about as far I'm prepared to drive to check stuff.
I've noticed lots of driveway additions lately. Not checked any.
mueschel (2021-03-10 09:40:30+00:00): Hallo,
bitte schau hier nochmal über die Destination-Tags. Die Reihenfolge der einzelnen Teile des Keys ist wichtig und ist immer

destination:ref:lanes:backward

also key-subkey-lanes-direction

Gruß
Jan
Bernhard Pranz (2021-03-10 19:50:49+00:00): Hi, 
danke für die Anmerkung - war mir nicht bewusst, dass dies wichtig ist. Habe jetzt alle Fehler der Sorte, die ich gefunden hab gefixt.
Lg Bernhard

PS: Wüsstest du eine overpass-Abfrage oder ähnliches mit der man das schnell feststellen kann?
mueschel (2021-03-16 12:18:51+00:00): Eine Abfrage, die falsche Tags sucht habe ich gerade nicht, das dürfte relativ aufwendig werden. Du kannst dir aber die verwendeten Tags in einem Gebiet ausgeben lassen und dann selbst durchschauen auf Auffälligkeiten:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/154T
vt100 (2021-03-20 11:11:13+00:00): Hi dufekin!

Looks like you put a typo into the shop tag of Buffalo Ranch Travel
Mind changing it to "shop=convenience"?
Thanks!
Tomasz Herud (2021-03-11 18:54:58+00:00): Hej, usunąłeś nie ten most co trzeba. Wyburzony został ten most: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Wiadukty+kolejowe+nad+przemsz%C4%85/@50.2134903,19.1699755,76m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m12!1m6!3m5!1s0x4716c5689c33d2c3:0xe252236993da9378!2sWiadukty+kolejowe+nad+przemsz%C4%85!8m2!3d50.2286582!4d19.1585094!3m4!1s0x4716c5689c33d2c3:0xe252236993da9378!8m2!3d50.2286582!4d19.1585094
olo81 (2021-03-11 23:18:43+00:00): ok już poprawiam
Jonathan Masur (2021-03-16 07:48:33+00:00): Ce n'est pas à vous de décider quelle route est "primary" ou "secondary", il y a des critères objectifs à respecter :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary

Seules les routes marquées 1-30 sur les panneaux doivent être taguées "primary" (excepté pour le canton de Genève).
Virgile1994 (2021-03-16 08:00:27+00:00): Je me suis basé sur le standard français :
- ex-RN faisant partie de la vague de déclassement de 2006
- voie classée comme principale sur la la BD routes 500
Le côté Français remplit totalement les critères pour être classée en primaire.
J'ai prolongé en Suisse pour la cohérence sans savoir que le nombre de routes principales était limité à 30 dans ce pays.
Virgile
Jonathan Masur (2021-03-17 20:00:21+00:00): Oui vous avez bien fait de changer du côté Français. Une discontinuité à la frontière c'est pas hyper élégant mais assez courant, il y en a plusieurs autres de toutes manières.
Carnildo (2021-03-10 06:21:29+00:00): Is that spelling correct, or should it be "Triple"?
DJ Cane (2021-03-10 06:25:20+00:00): The spelling is correct. I don’t know how it came to have two p’s, but it does. Older topo maps also have the hill it’s named for as Tripple.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-03-09 21:51:45+00:00): Hi,
please don't just move the address tags from address nodes to building ways. Address nodes are ok.
Greetings, Roger Wilco
mcliquid (2022-05-14 11:35:01+00:00): Hallo, was soll "Nata Lee left" an dieser Stelle bedeuten? Hast du dazu eine genauere Beschreibung?
Kovoschiz (2021-03-09 19:38:59+00:00): There's actually a stalled discussion concerning the section of Arsenal St north of Lockhart Rd, where one editor-person changed it to `=secondary`, among other up-ranks across the territory. I personally only consider the section on the south connecting onwards to Arsenal St Flyover as `=secondary`, as it serve as a crucial N-S exit.
Admasawi (2021-03-10 23:16:25+00:00): Hello Kovoschiz, I did not intend to interfere in the discussion but just address some inconsistencies I noticed. I did not notice a significant difference between the two directions of 軍器廠街 Arsenal Street in Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/J9wnh7RWkDDZzK_WeTGI0g). Because the secondary classification did not seem appropriate for the northern portion (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569675857), I extended the tertiary classification all the way to 軒尼詩道 Hennessy Road, which includes the southern portion you mentioned (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251356813). This was to ensure both directions of 告士打道 Gloucester Road have equivalent highway connections. I understand if you disagree because I can also envision a few classification schemes in this area.
Kovoschiz (2021-03-11 06:51:49+00:00): I can agree with your consistency, since this is the status before I change the southern section to `=secondary` to reflect Hennessy Rd's route to Gloucester Rd via Arsenal St. 
Since that editor-person didn't respond, I plan on making some changes when I'm done with my backlog.
Admasawi (2021-03-11 20:09:35+00:00): Thank you!
mariotomo (2021-09-19 16:24:28+00:00): all deleted by other mapper. Bayron94 never replied to questions on their contributions.
PT-53 (2021-03-10 08:53:31+00:00): Hallo womap1,
dann sollte sich dieses FIXME
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8297027926/history
ja erledigt haben.
Grüße
E de Wit (2021-03-09 21:30:41+00:00): Als ik het goed heb worden 'Ja joh! en 'Nee jongu' herplaatst naar een zichtlocatie.
JeroenHoek (2021-03-10 06:54:55+00:00): Naar het Spoordokgebied geloof ik. Ze gaan daar eerst in opslag. Blijft jammer.
eggie (2021-03-09 20:29:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback.. Netjes groter gemaakt..
Zal het volgens de data van het Kadster leggen. De dakrand vertekent.  De school was al getagd op de adfresnode.. Dat hoeft dus niet nog een keer op het gebouw. Het adres haal ik ook weer weg. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2021-03-11 23:40:13+00:00): Oops - not sure what happened here, but it looks like this change caused the national park to no longer be a valid multipolygon.  I've split the offending bit of "Sizer Way" in two so that the extra spur isn't part of the boundary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2678988/history#map=19/50.86364/-1.43430 , and it seems to be valid now.
If you're wondering how I spotted it, it was the "detecting future problems" part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse/diary/395232 (essentially to dump national park and AONB polygons from the database behind https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html , and comare the ones on the list today with yesterday).
Cheers,
Andy
SDavies (2021-03-19 15:35:55+00:00): Kudos for adding this. I noticed it was missing a few weeks ago... and just now remembered to add it and saw you did it 10 days ago! I will need to be careful editing this area as we both seem to be doing survey/improvements at the same time.
WalthamCity (2021-03-19 15:44:27+00:00): Thanks! I just added the one next to Hale End Library too. There are quite a few more around Highams Park still to be added to the map, I think. My current focus is mainly on adding and updating Highams Park and Chingford Mount shops.
mariotomo (2021-04-04 16:52:53+00:00): hola Hector Polo, gracias por seguir mejorando el mapa OSM!  muy detallada la edición!  pasé revisando el área y te ha cambiado dos "parking_space" en "parking" y unos bosques (natural=wood) en manglares (natural=wetland; wetland=mangrove).  gracias y saludos.
Alan (2021-04-06 22:07:08+00:00): 😲
skyper (2021-06-11 12:55:10+00:00): Hallo CreCrePL
Auch diese Änderungen haben leider die Ordnung von Busrelationen zerstört. Das Reparieren macht keinen Spaß, daher achte bittet darauf was Du wie änderst. Von iD würde ich im Moment komplett abraten.
Ciao skyper
mullica_q (2021-03-09 19:50:58+00:00): Source edit: Maxar Premium Imagery (0.95, -7.11); Strava