piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GilB (2019-10-24 20:07:45+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai modifié le tag amenity sur le magasin "Livres d'occasion" à Nantes. Il apparaissait avec un icône recyclage plutôt que librairie sur la carte OSM. Ce qui prête à confusion selon moi. Mélanger amenity et shop sur le même POI n'est pas idéal ...
Si le lieu récupère des livres usagés au delàl de son activité achat/vente d'occasion, il vaudrait mieux créer un POI spécifique.
chris-ren (2019-10-25 00:04:06+00:00): En effet ! Je devais être mal concentré. Merci de la correction.

Pour info j'ai récapitulé sur cette page les conseils (c'est une synthèse) pour cartographier les lieux de ventes de produits d'occasion.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_CircularEconomy

Merci encore.
zstadler (2020-02-26 15:08:20+00:00): Hello ondz,

In this edit the colour tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431079419 was changed from black to red. You may have missed the note on this segment  saying:

"DO NOT CHANGE THE colour TAG before visiting the trail. This is a black trail while the official map marks it as red"

Currently, there is a T junction of 3 red trails at the north end of this road.

Have you visited that junction and seen the 3 red trail marks?

The junction as it is seen on the Israel Hiking and Biking map:
https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/map/18.00/33.1439/35.6649
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-07-23 09:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72548457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake data in New Zealand.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3034 and 3037.
Sosha1996 (2019-07-09 12:08:11+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «شهرک صنعتی کاوه» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Leo Slager (2019-07-09 10:22:23+00:00): De wegen op de parkeerplaats worden meestal voorzien van de tag service=parking_aisle.

Probeer je in te lezen in de wiki voor je wat grotere wijzigingen gaat doen.
Omnific (2019-07-09 14:46:56+00:00): Hey, welcome to OSM. For the park you added, you added it as a way (line). For it to show up you'll want to add it as an area. You'll also want to merge the named park node here (point) with the park area when you create it. 

Let me know if you have questions. Cheers.
Sosha1996 (2019-07-09 12:08:13+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «شهرک صنعتی کاوه» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-07-09 12:08:15+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «شهرک صنعتی کاوه» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-07-09 12:08:17+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «شهرک صنعتی کاوه» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
DD1GJ (2019-07-09 08:12:48+00:00): Hallo JulianMöller, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Deine ersten Edits vom Mai waren noch ok, aber was hattest Du heute vor? Lauter selsame Parks und Rastplätze, zum Teil über bereits bestehenden Parkplätzen, Sportplätzen oder mitten im Wohngebiet. Ich habe daher alle Diene heutigen Änderungen zurückgesetzt. Weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

https://pokemon-go-forum.de/threads/pokemon-go-spieler-zerstoeren-open-streetmaps.3160/
noisi2000 (2019-07-09 06:07:19+00:00): Revert?
Warin61 (2019-07-09 06:32:26+00:00): The changes made .. possibly from other changesets (12 of themin all) have broken relation 5985104 (land cover = tundra).
noisi2000 (2019-07-09 06:40:14+00:00): I fixed it visually. 
In my opinion the tundra landcover is wrong in most places. I will replace the landcover later when I finished the treecovered area.
Warin61 (2019-07-09 06:40:42+00:00): The change set comment says "treeline" yet the relation is not for trees, some of the ways are used for the tree line .. but the relation that is being changed is not for the trees.
noisi2000 (2019-07-09 06:45:13+00:00): I know. Both are using the same edge in some places - I deleted some. I think this is and was the problem.
Warin61 (2019-07-09 07:04:13+00:00): When I introduced the tundra cover .. all of this area was mapped as 'trees'. 

What, if anything, is between the tree area and the tundra area? 

History:
The first estimation of the tundra area was done using the snow covered area, this was quick and got most of the area that was not trees out of the mapped tree area. Refining it can be done. And it can be done without braking the relations...
noisi2000 (2019-07-09 07:10:25+00:00): Ah Ok.
I'm sorry.
The previous Tundra surface was in many cases in the way. I try to first determine the forest boundary better. Everything above the forest should become Tundra area.
Glassman (2019-07-09 16:20:56+00:00): Tip: parks are normally mapped as areas not nodes. Can you fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72038923
user_5359 (2019-07-09 15:57:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
4004 (2019-07-09 21:55:57+00:00): хм, уже 3 года как, спасибо. там вроде только напитки?
TravGW (2019-07-09 11:59:35+00:00): These areas do not qualify as grasslands. Landuse=grass would fit better. Please see the wiki for details.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass
Joseph E (2019-08-12 13:46:57+00:00): Godfrey,
I noticed that you changed a couple of highway=path to highway=track near my town, for example, way 587611499: see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587611499/history - and nearby paths. 
These are footpaths between sweet potato fields. In the central mountains of Papua, there are almost no agricultural tracks, because agriculture is done by hand. I've visited these areas in person. I'd recommend caution before changing a highway=footway or =path to a track in this part of Indonesia, especially if they path was added by a local mapper.
Thank you, 
Joseph Eisenberg, 
Wamena, Papua Indonesia
Leo Slager (2019-07-09 08:03:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-07-09 08:12:05+00:00): Hallo Gaby,

Je changeset omvat bijna de helft van NL.
Het schuiven met de kaart houdt ook het gevaar in dat je onbedoeld punten of wegen versleept.
Beter is het om de wijziging dan in twee kleine changesets naar de server te uploaden.

Hier kun je de wijziging nog eens bekijken.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72039385
Het duurt even voor alles geladen is.
Als je dan inzoomt kun je zien dat je de weg hebt vastgeplakt aan een administratieve grens. 
Ik zal dat even losmaken.
Dat is een nare eigenschap van de editor iD, die alles aan elkaar wil plakken.
TIP gebruik de linker ALT-toets en iD plakt niet meer.
btwhite92 (2019-07-22 19:11:35+00:00): US 395 is not a motorway here due to multiple at-grade intersections. I will be reverting this changeset.
Warin61 (2019-07-09 06:55:11+00:00): To work on the tree line in this area there are 2 relations required.

Relation: 5985104 
and
Relation: 5449093

and possibly other relations too. 

Recommend using one only imagery, and the best resolution is from the LPI Imagery in this area.
noisi2000 (2019-07-09 07:04:47+00:00): Sorry, I'm new to the editor.
Why are they required? 
In most cases, I have only changed the existing land cover polygons. The relations should not be changed.

For the treeline is try to use more than the LPI Imagery. Due to forest fires, the border is not always clear.

I hope I improve the card more than destroying it...
Warin61 (2019-07-09 07:09:44+00:00): Relation: 5985104  is now broken. 

See the purple dots in https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.33928&lat=-36.17368&zoom=9

Basically some ways have had nodes removed, shortening them so they no longer connect together to form a closed outer way for the relation. If there are ways that join they have not been included in the relation.
noisi2000 (2019-07-09 07:14:17+00:00): I understand. How can I close the Polygon again?
Warin61 (2019-07-10 00:38:06+00:00): Humm .. 

You are adding 'scrub' and rock etc. Good. An increase in detail. 

Between the scrub and rock? Tundra? 

Finish off the additions. 

Then Consider the tree edges, should have more detail here .. but time constraints prevented me entering it. Relation: 5449093 is the one. 

Once those are tidy .. or you run out of time. then consider the trundra relation. The trees and scrub wold probably from the outers, and inners would be the rocks etc. 

See how you go. It will not be easy.
noisi2000 (2019-07-10 06:20:26+00:00): Ich versuche vor allem die Details zu verbessern. 
Alles oberhalb srub wird tundra werden. Die Donuts durch Felsen und Geröll werden ich erstmal aussparen. So wie beispielsweise rund um die Ramshead Range wo ich bereits fertig bin. Ich werde mich nun erstmal nordwärts bis zum Schlink Pass vorarbeiten wo ich dann auch das zerstörte tundra polygon schließen werde. Die Gesamten Snowy Mountains werde ich vermutlich nicht schaffen.
Aber gut, man muss die Karte als ganzes sehen und ich finde die Karte ist jetzt schon besser als zuvor.
noisi2000 (2019-07-10 06:35:38+00:00): And translated...
Above all, I try to improve the details.
Everything above srub will become tundra. The donuts through rocks and boulders I will first save. Like, for example, around the Ramshead Range where I'm already done. I will now work my way north to the Schlink Pass where I will close the destroyed tundra polygon. I probably will not be able to manage the entire Snowy Mountains.
But good, you have to see the map as a whole and I think the map is already better than before.
So, now, where are all the trees gone? Was that me?
Warin61 (2019-07-10 07:48:48+00:00): Wait a while for the trees? 
Some places are still 'flooded' from some coding error. 

I think 'we' all try to make the map better. There certainly is a lot of it that can be improved. And few mappers ...
noisi2000 (2019-07-10 09:37:43+00:00): No change - this is a terrible and visible error...
Warin61 (2019-07-10 22:19:57+00:00): I'll have a look at it later.
user_1566574 (2020-08-13 18:53:55+00:00): Salut !
Concernant la Rue de l'Église (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238027444/) et de l'École (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37579258), es-tu sûr pour access=destination ?

Merci d'avance !
zaizone (2020-08-13 20:36:52+00:00): Hello, ca fait déjà un an que je suis passé la bas, mais si mes souvenirs sont bons il y a des panneaux "sens interdit, sauf riverains". Une verif sur "streetview" devrait confirmer. Le but pour la commune est de forcer la circulation sur le grand axe pour les personnes en transit.
user_1566574 (2020-08-13 21:28:00+00:00): Pardon, mes excuses. Ça me semblait très très inhabituel de voir cet attribut sur ce genre de route.

Merci pour la clarification et pour tes contributions ! 😉
zaizone (2020-08-13 21:49:15+00:00): J'immagine qu'il y a d'autres moyens de cartographier/tagguer pour signifier cette interdiction.
Il n'y a vraiment pas de quoi t'excuser pour la demande de précisions, c'est bien le sens du projet. J'aurais du écrire un commentaire plus explicite pour le changeset.
Merci & bonne carto
scratera (2019-07-09 09:51:15+00:00): sarei stato più propenso a mantenere i dati in osm eliminando il solo tag higway
ciao paolo
Hjart (2019-07-09 07:36:46+00:00): I've reverted this changeset, because of lots of inaccurasies and loose ends. Also when editing in Denmark, please use our national SDFE aerial imagery.
asyabokshtein (2019-07-09 07:40:26+00:00): Hey! Thank you for reviewing the edits. Can you please explain what inaccuracies you have found?
The goal was to connect bus stops to the roads: in many cases the permissions made stops inaccessible.
Hjart (2019-07-09 07:57:30+00:00): Many footways were drawn across main roads away from actual pedestrian crossings and with no proper connection nodes. Also most of the footways ending near the bus stops would be flagged as possible mistakes in the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector tools
If you had made edits at 1 or 2 bus stop only I could have cleaned it up, but this was too many and I'll have to ask you to take more care.
asyabokshtein (2019-07-09 08:07:09+00:00): I will explain the situation to you: we use OSM for a free trip planner app and it's very inaccurate now when used for the public transportation: bus stops are completely disconnected from the paths with walking permission. 
I added the sidewalks along the highways that lead to the bus stops and connected them to the secondary roads - is that a mistake? I also added street crossings for people to be able to walk across the highway. 

I would really appreciate it if you could explain to me more how to do the fixes the right way, especially because I want to continue fixing such issues. 

If you could give me an example of an inaccurate fix or go over my changes, that would be really helpful
Hjart (2019-07-09 08:33:49+00:00): At i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=55.35770&mlon=10.34055#map=19/55.35770/10.34055&layers=N you made a footway across Assensvej without connecting it to Assensvej
This would need to be done more like i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419993046

 Also I would really appreciate if the last node of footways ending close to other roads is tagged https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit
Hjart (2019-07-09 08:57:35+00:00): Hint. If you open iD somewhere within Denmark, iD will automatically use the preferred aerial imagery here (which is different from what you used in this changeset). Same with many other regions
asyabokshtein (2019-07-09 13:33:15+00:00): That was very clear and helpful. Thank you! I will do my best to follow the standart
TravGW (2019-07-09 11:26:49+00:00): This is an apartment complex, not a park.
marc__marc (2019-11-26 12:58:35+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702613440
what's this ?
a tourism=camp_pitch ?
or a duplicate of the whole https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1345663241 ?
Regards,
Marc
seattlefyi (2019-07-12 00:31:13+00:00): Hi, glad to see the edit. Do you happen to know if the address is still valid for the next business? Perhaps we can keep the node so we don't lose the address info! Thanks again!
steinm (2019-07-12 06:05:06+00:00): I'll check this weekend how far they got. There is currently some construction work going on, but there will be definitely some business but not a hotel anymore.

Nice to see somebody mapping the Seattle area to come here in the province of germany :-)
seattlefyi (2019-07-12 23:46:54+00:00): No problem, we're all doing the best we can! (I see you've been mapping longer than I have!) I think this address thing is an easy detail to overlook, so thought I'd waste some time looking for instances worldwide and reach out to strangers. :) In regards to Germany, wish I were going to SOTM this year, maybe 2020! Cheers!
frosm (2019-07-09 14:52:31+00:00): Bonjour,
as-tu lu ma précédente remarque https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/68197916 ?
ChrissW-R1 (2023-08-04 21:10:22+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/3816875
Leo Slager (2019-07-09 10:33:26+00:00): In de ZW hoek van de changeset zijn zo veel elementen geraaakt dat het bijna ondoenlijk is om te controleren waar het fout is gegaan.
Wees voorzichtig met verdere wijzigingen en maak je changeset vooral niet te groot.
pyrog (2020-04-24 08:16:30+00:00): Bonjour Camille,

Le brand:wikidata de la Banque Populaire s'est "transformé" en celui de la banque pop… du Maroc ;)

Je corrige :)

__
Yves
Jose Luis Infante (2019-07-09 09:50:20+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva contribució.
Una pregunta: on és aquest aparcament? Dins de l'estació? Fora?
És per corregir un petit error. Has indicat que l'aparcament pertany a la línia de FGC.
Salutacions!
Sprvgd (2019-07-09 09:54:40+00:00): Hola, està a la zona exterior, just a sobre de la linia de FGC. com ho puc corregir?
Sprvgd (2019-07-09 09:57:14+00:00): pd: corregit, gràcies
pesec (2019-07-09 11:55:46+00:00): На основании каких данных вы вносили данную правку?
на всех публичных спутниковых снимках ситуация выглядит совершенно по другому.
Pavel Zamiatin (2019-07-09 11:59:38+00:00): На основании слов водителя такси, клиента ехавшего с ним и gps трека поездки. Так же данная информация подтверждается 2Гис и Яндекс Картами.
https://2gis.ru/tyumen?queryState=center%2F65.563831%2C57.098214%2Fzoom%2F18
https://yandex.ru/maps/55/tyumen/?ll=65.564988%2C57.098492&z=17.73
pesec (2019-07-09 12:24:33+00:00): Данные 2Ubc и Яндкс.карты не являются достоверными и не могут использоваться согласно соглашению о работе OSM.
В качестве условно-достоверной информации можно опираться на публичные снимки со спутника и панорамы.
Снимки Google показывают совсем иную ситуацию.
Откорректировал.
pesec (2019-07-09 12:25:46+00:00): Данные 2Гис и Яндекс.Карты не являются достоверными и не могут использоваться согласно соглашению о работе OSM.
Pavel Zamiatin (2019-07-09 12:30:44+00:00): А откуда они по вашему берут информацию о дорогах/зданиях? Не со спутниковых снимков? Вот gps-трек поездки водителя такси https://yadi.sk/i/aYJKR4hH3JGjJQ
Этого достаточно для подтверждения моих правок?
pesec (2019-07-09 12:34:50+00:00): Правила OSM:
"Напоминаем участникам сообщества OSM, что добавление данных из любых защищённых авторским правом источников (например, с Google Maps или печатных карт) не должно проводиться без явного предварительного согласия правообладателей."
https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
seattlefyi (2019-07-18 23:00:32+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits! I went through and retagged some of the items you drew, and removed the names which are (like "Garage" on a garage). Thanks again, and please ask if you have questions!
aixbrick (2019-07-09 08:47:27+00:00): Versehentlich beide Changesets komplett zurückgesetzt :-(. Rückgängig gemacht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72044121.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-07-09 08:54:27+00:00): Note that this partially reverts changeset 67085538 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67085538>.
Leo Slager (2019-07-09 10:27:38+00:00): Twee zo ver uit elkaar liggende wijzigingen in 1 changeset uploaden, is in OSM niet gebruikelijk.
Probeer je gebied zo klein mogelijk te houden.
Frans S (2019-07-09 09:15:36+00:00): Hi Bouxy99. During review of some tasks my attention was caught by this changeset. 
Why all these deletions? I checked the mappings of ALPZz and they were correct as far I can see 
Frans S  (sr validator)
user_5359 (2019-07-09 15:56:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice we divide the address information in five keys starting with addr: (housenumber, street, city, state, postcode).
SomeoneElse (2019-07-13 13:16:22+00:00): Hello,
This just looks like a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/470017960 ?
Best Regards,
Andy
Brian773 (2019-07-13 15:46:56+00:00): oh, yes, you're right. It should be deleted
SomeoneElse (2019-07-13 16:15:20+00:00): Thanks - done.
maraf24 (2019-07-15 09:21:39+00:00): Cześć
W zasadzie to wysp nie dodałeś. Dodałeś tylko pokrycie wysp, dlatego też wyglądają one na mapie tak dziwnie.
Edytor powinien mieć możliwe do wybrania coś takiego jak wyspa/wysepka.
mac kra2 (2019-07-15 13:45:47+00:00): Cześć,
Dzięki za uwagę :) Zgadza się, jest wysepka na wodzie. Już zmieniłem
Pozdrawiam :)
vrmap (2019-08-09 06:11:46+00:00): Ciao mamo_ita, non ho mai visto un castello nella posizione che hai indicato, esiste un panoramico un po più avanti https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1332026113
vrmap
mamo_ita (2019-08-09 06:54:42+00:00): Hai ragione.
Ho provveduto a risistemare.
vrmap (2019-08-09 06:14:49+00:00): Ciao mamo_ita, non ho mai visto un castello nella posizione che hai indicato
vrmap