piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
evgenykatyshev (2019-03-26 13:25:52+00:00): Зачем вы рисуете железнодорожные пути и станции, от которых в реальности даже не осталось следов? Это противоречит правилам проекта OpenStreetMap.

Вы можете рисовать только те пути, которые ещё есть в реальности. Как минимум, от путей должна остаться дорога или насыпь. Недействующие станции вообще не надо рисовать.

Удалите, пожалуйста, пути, от которых уже не осталось следов. Частично я их уже сам удалил.
Ruxs (2019-03-26 14:04:02+00:00): я работал на этой узкоколейке, я там был недавно. Насыпь есть, где то встречаются шпалы. Да и не вижу смысла убирать пути, ведь в режиме просмотра их не видно, так как они под тегом разобраны.
evgenykatyshev (2019-03-26 18:38:04+00:00): Ваши линии в Железнодорожном идут по зданиям и частным участкам, так не может быть. Заброшенные линии отмечают там, где либо ничего нет, кроме насыпи или рельс, либо есть какой-то путь.

OSM — это не то, что видно на главной карте. Если неверные данные не видны на ней, то это не значит, что они не должны быть удалены.

Вы либо сами оставьте только те участки, которые действительно существуют, либо другие участники удалят всё, что будет выглядеть сомнительно.
viloan (2018-11-26 18:14:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
b-jazz (2018-12-29 02:18:26+00:00): Hey there HKjr. Just to let you know that drawing a brand new way alongside an existing road is not the right way to designate a bus route. I can't give specifics on exactly how to do it correctly, but I do know that a new way is incorrect and this route will need to be replaced. You might want to look here for info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Adding_a_bus_route_to_OpenStreetMap
HKjr (2018-12-30 19:47:22+00:00): Yeah I saw that this was totally wrong, I was trying to figure out how to do it but I totally forgot about this route i made (whoops) I'll try to fix it and otherwise just delete it. My bad, and happy new year!
b-jazz (2018-12-30 20:19:38+00:00): Great. Thanks! Happy new year to you as well. Maybe I'll learn how to properly do bus routes in the new year.
az09 (2018-11-26 20:20:19+00:00): что за участки? откуда адреска?
Емельянов Александр (2018-11-27 17:22:29+00:00): Просто условно-произвольно определил для себя участки. Адреска из разных источников. А что, есть ошибки в адреске?
az09 (2018-12-02 09:47:22+00:00): Оу, да это же зум и координаты! Про участки дошло.
А с адреской конечно не стоит использовать несвободные источники (типа 2гис или карты яндекса), вот самостоятельно собранные ОК. Панорамы яндекса тоже отчасти можно, где именно с фото считывается а не маркером обозначено. Вообще в вики много об этом написано, например https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0_1.1#.D0.9D.D0.B5_.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.B7.D1.83.D0.B9.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.B4.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8B.D0.B5.2C_.D0.BE.D1.85.D1.80.D0.B0.D0.BD.D1.8F.D0.B5.D0.BC.D1.8B.D0.B5_.D0.B0.D0.B2.D1.82.D0.BE.D1.80.D1.81.D0.BA.D0.B8.D0.BC_.D0.BF.D1.80.D0.B0.D0.B2.D0.BE.D0.BC
И обязательно общайтесь с сообществом через форум и телеграм https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D1%81%D0%B2%D1%8F%D0%B7%D0%B8
Carto'Cité (2018-12-06 16:28:28+00:00): Bonjour.
Merci pour ces contributions. Je me suis permis de les préciser. En effet il s'agit - si j'en crois l'imagerie aérienne BDOrtho - d'une bande cyclable. J'ai donc remplacé la piste cyclable par l'ajout du tag cycleway:left=lane sur la Rue de la Paroise.
Par ailleurs la piste cyclable n'était pas connectée à la rue, ce qui empêche les outils de calculs d'itinéraires de l'utiliser. 
C'est un peu compliqué je sais, aussi n'hésite pas à me questionner :-)
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
geri-oc (2019-05-12 09:05:14+00:00): Du hast den Quohrener Bach über Wege Straßen verzogen:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=101&error=101453568

Könntest du bitte einmal nachschauen - auch eventuell andere Fehler - du warst ja vor Ort. Gruß Gerd
MichaOSM (2019-05-12 19:14:05+00:00): habs korrigiert, Micha
freebeer (2018-11-28 14:25:22+00:00): hallo reemal,
i am trying to understand how it is happening in the changesets you are making in this area to split roads, it is seeming that some of these split segments are losing one particular public transport membership.

you should be able to see the discontinuities here along page mill road, by the gaps in the orange at
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-122.15415&lat=37.40792&zoom=17&opacity=0.66&overlays=ptv2_routes_,ptv2_routes_valid,ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
there look to be three in this local area.

i have been mentioning this to one of your lyft cow-orkers in nearby osm Notes less than a km to the east, where a similar new gap in this same route relation has been introduced, as well as the obvious newly-divided highway issue which started this all.

do you do anything special when you make these splits?  do you have to copy the route relationships over by hand, or do they get automatically copied over to both sections?

i am thinking this might be a problem introduced by the iD editor much of your team appears to use, as i have read of problems in editing such things, with the recommendation to use the JOSM editor for route editing.

it seems strange that the two below sections of road, the v3 and new v1 ways, contain the same mapper `note=' comment and most everything else i could see was identical, only that one of the six or seven relationship memberships was absent.

thank you if you or your team can clarify this.

regards,
SpencerJaquish (2018-11-29 00:49:16+00:00): Hello freebeer,
My name is Spencer, I lead the OSM Mapping Team here at Lyft. I appreciate you letting us know about this error! We plan to resolve these broken relations using the OSM Inspector you linked in your comment asap. With the Inspector we’ll identify the ways that are missing relations, navigate to OSM, identify which relation(s) are missing, and add them in ensuring that we apply the correct relations for forward/backward directions of travel (since we split the way into two). Going forward the team will have a more stringent validation process using a combination of Inspector, JOSM Validation, and Osmose to avoid or catch errors like this. If you have any suggestions on how we can better map, validate, or train our mapping team we’d appreciate the feedback! 
Thanks again!
-Spencer
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Andrea Musuruane (2018-12-02 20:31:59+00:00): Ciao. Non usare le foto aeree di Bing. Non sono correttamente allineate. Quelle migliori sono le PCN 2006 (anche se non sono recenti). I nodi della strada che hai spostato, infatti, erano meglio allineati prima :-/ Ciao, Andrea
highflyer74 (2018-11-29 09:10:14+00:00): Hello and thank you for you edit!

Please keep in mind not to use any "-" or "/" in phone numbers.

Thank you! :-)
eggie (2018-11-27 11:51:00+00:00): Hi Kas.. What is your intention to create edits in one changeset. This will harm the map!
eggie (2018-11-27 11:54:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Wanneer je schuift met de kaart in de editmodus geeft dit vaak schade aan de kaart door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Je zult de eerste niet zijn die een hoekje van een gebouw over de halve wereld schuift. 
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-11-26 19:26:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ronery-mapper (2018-12-01 22:35:37+00:00): Could you please explain your changes to node #6020094887 ?
arcth (2018-12-04 00:45:12+00:00): According to the name=Kukaiņu māja tag on version 1 of this node [1], it represents an insect hotel [2] which most probably isn't an artwork.

[1] http://osmhistory.appspot.com/node/6020094887/1

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:man_made%3Dinsect_hotel&oldid=1555413
ronery-mapper (2019-01-16 19:39:10+00:00): Seems legit, but would be nice to at least preserve latvian name. Will add it again. Thanks for explanation.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
gormo (2018-12-18 08:25:14+00:00): Hi, ich habe mit dem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65573377 ein Multipolygon von dir gelöscht, das da m.E. unnötig, und obendrein defekt, war. Der Friedhof ist so (als closed way) schon gut eingetragen, finde ich. Oder wolltest Du den aus dem umgebenden Wald ausschneiden?
viloan (2018-11-26 19:42:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:26:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-11-27 15:59:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Можете объяснить, что вы делаете?
BCNorwich (2018-11-27 08:01:43+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've placed you incline data on the section of Canonbie Road, as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline

I can see your good intention but is the name really Steep hill, and I doubt it is strictly a natural peak. 
Are you sure of your elevation data (ele=18 meters), if this is correct and verifiable it the tag should be placed on an appropriate highway node.
So the POI can then be removed. 

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2018-11-27 08:28:51+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've amended your opening hours tag to suit OSM best practice. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Regards Bernard.
b-jazz (2018-11-26 20:19:39+00:00): Thanks! I'm guessing the "construction" tags could also be removed at this point?
Golfdog (2018-11-26 20:50:57+00:00): Yes.  Thank you.
BCNorwich (2018-11-27 08:36:27+00:00): Hi, you dragged a kerb node out of place, I've returned it no harm done but please be careful when uploading changes. 

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2018-11-27 08:38:14+00:00): Hi, sorry to say this cafe was already mapped so I've removed your duplicate.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2018-11-27 08:48:19+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There is already a cafe mapped here so I have removed your duplicate POI.
If there are changes to the POI please amend the original POI thus keeping all history.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2018-11-27 08:45:00+00:00): Again you inadvertently dragged a node out of place, I've returned it no harm done.

Regards Bernard.
Jordi MF (2018-11-28 09:07:28+00:00): Hola Adrián,

Gracias por contribuir en OSM. ¿Estás seguro que esta vía tiene ese nombrencomo 'Paso peatonal'?. Es decir, ¿existe alguna placa, rótulo o lugar donde ponga exactamente que ese paso peatonal se llama así? Si no, deberíamos evitar usar la etiqueta "name=*".

Gracias. Un saludo,

Jordi
un usuario (2018-11-28 10:36:25+00:00): Hola Jordi,
No hay ninguna placa que verifique su nombre, pero los habitantes de al rededor y varios articulos que hablan de su construccion y algunas noticias ocurridas en ese mismo puente lo nombran "Paso peatonal de la Llum a Chirivella" o "Pasarela de Chirivella". No sabría decirte seguro si dejarlo o no. Supongo que tendrás mas experiencia y sabras si dejarlo así o no con los datos que tengo de la pasarela.

Un saludo,

Adrián
Jordi MF (2018-11-28 16:04:41+00:00): En estos casos no es correcto añadir esa información en la etiqueta 'name'. Puedes leer la información de 'Buenas prácticas': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a/Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#Name_inclu.C3.ADdo_en_v.C3.ADas

Lo mejor será trasladar la información que hay ahora en 'name' a 'description:es=*'. Puedes hacerlo tú mismo. Saludos

Jordi
viloan (2018-11-26 20:50:48+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
osmviborg (2018-11-26 21:45:47+00:00): Er det ikke lidt voldsomt at kalde disse små områder for 'Park' https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Zaffo80 (2018-12-31 17:27:48+00:00): Ciao Matteo, ho fatto un sopralluogo ma il capanno sembra non esistere. L'hai inserito per errore?
MATTEO BERTOLDO (2018-12-31 17:30:26+00:00): È per segnalare che c'è una tettoia, molto amplia per ripararsi dalla pioggia
Constable (2019-01-01 17:18:32+00:00): Ciao, ok ma il capanno stando alla mappa risulta in mezzo ad un campo da gioco, la posizioen è corretta?
Qua sembra essere già stato mappato un capanno https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255933498
MATTEO BERTOLDO (2019-01-01 17:20:55+00:00): Oh caspita è vero è già segnato, scusa per l'inconveniente
Constable (2019-01-01 17:21:54+00:00): nessun problema, riesci a cancellare questo oggetto quindi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6093791886
grazie!
Zaffo80 (2019-01-02 22:20:06+00:00): Ciao Matteo, tutto chiaro adesso. Grazie mille.

Ho solo un dubbio: gli orari di apertura a cosa si riferiscono? Non ho visto cartelli durante un paio di sopralluoghi.
osmviborg (2018-11-26 21:40:02+00:00): Du bruger name=* som beskrivelse af objektet, det er en fejl. Se mere her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
MichaelSEgedal (2018-11-26 21:56:09+00:00): Tak. Jeg læser på det. Der er lige noget at sætte sig ind i... :-)
Martin Borsje (2018-11-27 20:53:51+00:00): Hoi Lampier,

Dank voor je edits!
Maar, misschine: zou je in plaats van je omschrijving "Kennis lokale situatie, gebruik luchtfoto" een wat specfieker omschrijving kunnen geven van WAT je gewijzigd hebt? :-)
daniel_solow (2020-03-24 12:16:47+00:00): Hi,

I encountered 'Stambenazgrada' when my iD editor highlighted the way conflicts in Sunnyside. Could you provide your sources for this circular building? It doesn't appear to match existing satellite imagery. Did you mistakenly press the 'O' key on your keyboard? If I don't hear back I will revert it as the building associated with that BIN appears to have no new construction activity.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/280297398

http://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/PropertyProfileOverviewServlet?bin=4054161&go4=+GO+&requestid=0
GinaroZ (2018-11-29 00:02:13+00:00): Couldn't help but add the surface to this path after I notice the mapillary images :) Saw some 20mph signs as well.
PT-53 (2018-11-27 08:30:20+00:00): Hallo Nachtspazz,
bist Du Dir sicher, daß Schleifweg der Name des Weges und nicht ein Flur-Namen ist ?
Woher hast Du Deine Info ?
Fragende Grüße
Nachtspazz (2018-11-27 20:35:41+00:00): Zum einen ist der Weg in der EBU-Müllinfo verzeichnet. Zum anderen gibt es im Telefonbuch Privatadressen mit dem Namen. Und schließlich ist der Weg auf den Here-Karten so bezeichnet.
PT-53 (2018-11-28 07:59:52+00:00): Hallo Nachtspazz,
daß es Adressen mit "Schleifweg" gibt, sagt noch nicht aus, daß es sich dabei um einen Straßennamen handelt. Das kann auch ein Siedlungs- oder Flurnamen sein. Im Kreis BC kommt das öfters vor, daß Flurnamen für Adressen verwendet werden. Dann nehme ich statt addr:street eben addr:place für die Angabe.
In Maps4BW ist jedenfals kein Straßennamen"Schleifweg" eingegetragen. Leider werden in Maps4BW jetzt keine Flurnamen mehr angezeigt, was meine Vermutung bestätigen könnte.
Grüße
Nachtspazz (2018-11-28 20:34:08+00:00): Sorry, ich dachte du weisst, das wir gerade im Raum Ulm die Straßen mit der Liste der Stadt abgleichen, siehe: http://daten.ulm.de/daten/single/strassenverzeichnis-und-gewannnamen. Dort wird auch eindeutig zwischen Straße und Gewann unterschieden. Und "Schleifweg" ist dort als Straße in Donaustetten aufgeführt. Und wie gesagt, auf Here-Maps ist der Name so auch eingezeichnet.
Nachtspazz (2018-11-28 20:42:13+00:00): (Wobei man sagen muss, dass auch in der Liste der Stadt Ulm nicht alles, was als Straße gekennzeichnet ist, auch tatsächlich ein Weg oder eine Straße ist, sondern oft auch nur eine Adresse eines Hofes o.ä., oder gar nur eine Adresse, wie zum Beispiel "Güterbahnhof").
DD1GJ (2018-11-26 23:11:45+00:00): Hallo MarkusH74, willkommen bei OSM und danke für die Hydranten. Verwende bitte keine bereits existierende Knoten, sondern erstelle jeweils einen einzelnen neuen Knoten genau an der Stelle, wo sich der Hydrant befindet. Weitere Informationen findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viel Spaß mit OSM.
pangoSE (2018-11-27 11:33:01+00:00): You deleted the snow-mobile road. Can you explain?
pangoSE (2018-12-21 20:17:32+00:00): I restored it according to your request. Using JOSM.
b-jazz (2018-11-29 19:49:55+00:00): Hi @bradrh. Looks like you had a fun Thanksgiving weekend on your bike. 

When uploading GPS tracks, you might want to zoom in and edit out any spots where you stopped to admire the view or catch your breath. The GPS will jitter and leave a cluster of poorly aligned points.
bradrh (2018-11-29 21:20:43+00:00): Oops.  Is there a tool to do that or an easy way to do that in josm?
b-jazz (2018-11-29 22:29:45+00:00): There is the Simplify Way (Shift+Y) command under Tools that will help, but it isn't perfect, I've had it leave behind a way that crosses itself.
If you are in JOSM, you should be able to select the way, and validate it (Shift-V) and it will bring up the validation panel telling you there is a point in the way that crosses itself.
My Garmin has an auto-stop feature that will stop recording if it detects that I've stopped moving. That might help as well.
bradrh (2018-11-30 16:20:39+00:00): I found that selecting the offending nodes and 'merge' works well.
b-jazz (2018-11-30 19:17:19+00:00): Excellent. I hadn't thought of that solution.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-15 18:10:55+00:00): malicious deletion of a landuse relation, w/o caring for its member, w/o refining
using sock puppet Steenbuck for edit war with local user
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
pio2_122 (2018-12-07 20:02:13+00:00): Oj, nieładnie zmieniać adres na nieprawidłowy.