piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-08-26 01:27:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2019-03-09 01:29:53+00:00): Hi
You have the construction tags wrong. They were correct before you changed them.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Construction

E.g. Node: Cherrybrook (2699627446)
  Tags: 
    "name"="Cherrybrook"
    "station"="subway"
    "construction"="yes"
    "railway"="station"

Should be:
    "name"="Cherrybrook"
    "station"="subway"
    "construction"="station"
    "railway"="construction"
Leo Slager (2018-08-26 10:16:25+00:00): Gebouwen worden rechtstreeks geîmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster.
Daar kun je dus beter van af blijven.
Op het forum kun je een verzoek doen voor een nieuwe import.
Dan komt ook de nieuwe toegang aan de ZW-zijde op de kaart te staan.
dvdhoven (2018-08-26 13:19:17+00:00): En voor plekken in de schaduw en onder bomen en ook nauwkeurigheid kun je de BGT gebruiken. Met BGT omtrekgericht kun je de straten en paden heel goed uitrichten.
Zoek even op het forum. Er is een draad over de BGT
Supaplex (2019-02-07 02:57:37+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
aharvey (2018-12-10 01:55:02+00:00): Hey Warin, In this changeset you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608927871 as "delete cycleway - not there". How do you know it's not there? It was only added one month before you deleted it, so it's very recent. It shows up on both the recent NSW LPI Imagery and the more recent photo I took https://www.flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/45324895234/.

I've reinstated that deleted way.
aharvey (2018-12-10 01:59:49+00:00): The other issue is you've now mapped 3 parks, based on what looks like the cadastre/legal parcels.

It's good practice to map what's on the ground https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground , and on the ground there is just one park, can we change this back?
Warin61 (2018-12-10 03:32:58+00:00): You mean to combine 
Wanda Reserve with Don Lucas Reserve? 

They look to be separately named .. 
http://www.sutherlandshire.nsw.gov.au/Outdoors/Parks-and-Playgrounds/Parks/Don-Lucas-Reserve-Cronulla
http://www.sutherlandshire.nsw.gov.au/Outdoors/Parks-and-Playgrounds/Parks/Wanda-Reserve

As for the third area to the north .. I think some of that should be included in the above 2 parks .. but there does not look to be a good boundary for the Wanda Reserve .. possibly for the Don Lucas Reserve .. looks like a fence line could be used. 

The third area to the north looks to have several 'names' in OSM .. 'Greenhills' and 'Wanda Sand Hills' appear on the map.
Warin61 (2018-12-10 03:37:30+00:00): Oh,
thanks for picking up on the cycleway .. some how I must have missed it? (slaps head).
viloan (2018-08-26 02:55:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2018-08-27 10:55:08+00:00): Hi,
you invented some new tags like "building:rowhouse" and "building:house". These are not documented - what do they mean? Did you check the wiki how buildings are commonly tagged? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

Jan
syrilltheartist (2018-08-30 06:22:11+00:00): thank you for your concerned ms/mr. mueschel I wil fix this a soon as possible
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-08-27 14:26:04+00:00): Você usou nomes abreviados, de onde copiou? Não usamos abreviações no OSM
ferpanga (2018-08-27 14:57:23+00:00): Nao copiei de nenhum lugar, pois são as ruas do meu bairro e nao sabia q nao usavam abreviação
lorandr_telenav (2018-09-14 07:43:00+00:00): Hi. 
I saw you edited our signpost edits.
We've benn working following  this rules. What it's you opinion about it? Is there anyting we did not take into consideration? 
Thank you

https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/adding-exit-and-destination-signs/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Exit_Info

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction
Your Village Maps (2018-09-14 22:12:47+00:00): I've been doing a lot of editing on and near CO 470 (C-470) lately and noticed most Exit Numbers were missing.  Confusing story:  a company contracting with CDOT added a bunch of blue services signs a few years ago (the ones with the paid advertiser logos on them) and they all had Exit Number tabs on them, but the big green signs (BGS) did NOT have Exit Number tabs added.  I started to add them and then found out that CDOT wasn't going to add Exit Numbers to the exits and would remove the Exit Number tabs from the blue signs, which they did, and I made a note of it in a later edit session.

However, NOW they have added Exit Numbers!  Some are not yet signed in the area of the C-470 Express Lanes expansion project (from Wadsworth Boulevard to I-25).  

I had not known of the junction:ref tag for motorway links until now.  I will start doing that from now on, where Exit Numbers exist.

I didn't know that they had been edited by anyone at Telenav, as I don't always check the history of a way.  Did I make some mistakes?  Did I delete junction:ref tags?  ( I don't recall ever seeing any).  I also noticed that some Exit Numbers had been added, but it was sporadic, not consistent.  I have corrected that.

Anything else?

Thanks

David
lorandr_telenav (2018-09-17 08:32:01+00:00): Hi.
Thanks for your response,the problem was with the tag: destination:ref=* , you moved it to name=* which is not correct.
Can you please take a look on your edits (for example here: 39.726204, -105.2021818)and change them on the correct tag?
Thank you!
5m4u9 (2018-08-31 16:27:54+00:00): hola, el otro día pasé por ahí y ví el anuncio... era una bonita casa... 
//
voy a ponerlo como construcción porque aún no se terminó el edificio
74523978 (2019-03-07 09:47:29+00:00): Bijna volledig overbodige edit. Exacte tekening op basis van BAG coördinaten met de losse pols tenietgedaan. Parkeerplaats onnodig verwijderd en teruggezet waardoor de geschiedenis is uitgewist. Nadruk leggen op eigen werk?
Jakson Aquino (2018-08-26 17:02:59+00:00): Está correta a marcação da Av. Francisco Sá como mão única entre a Padre Anchieta e a José Jatahy? Até uma ou duas semanas atrás, esse trecho era mão dupla.
O Fim (2018-09-01 00:12:19+00:00): sim tenho certeza ate entrei na contra mão por causa disso,e mão dupla apenas para ônibus vc pode ver as imagens que fiz pelo openstreetcam
Jakson Aquino (2018-09-05 00:32:28+00:00): Está certo! No caso, poderíamos adicionar a tag busway=opposite_lane a esse trecho.
Aliás, a Av. João Pessoa está indevidamente duplicada. Acho que o mais certo seria ela ser mapeada como esse trecho da Av. Francisco Sá.
O Fim (2018-09-08 02:57:22+00:00): Quantos mais dados adicionados as vias melhor, já na duplicação de pista se não existir uma barreira física, a pista extra deve ser removida, vc pode ver que dupliquei a Avenida Filomeno Gomes, que tem uma barreira fisica
literan (2018-08-26 11:24:16+00:00): проход в здании это не тоннель. исправил.
Nordpfeil (2018-08-26 18:21:39+00:00): Wenn you look to the entrance and exit and the former "tunnel" (layer -1) you may see that the way you changed was side the building and in the underground with a ramp and stairs (to be mapped) to enter downwards an to exit upwards again. Down in the underground in the "Nocturnal World" you see animals which are night active. The animals mapped on the chart like the BOPOH are birds in caged whixh are on layer 0. The way to see this birds has still to be mapped and is outside (south-westerly of) the building.
May you please consider and re-map again.
Nordpfeil (2018-08-27 18:01:51+00:00): Когда вы смотрите на вход и выход и на прежний «туннель» (слой -1), вы можете увидеть, что пешеходная дорожка, которую вы изменили, находилась внутри здания и в метро с рампой и лестницей (все еще отображаться), чтобы войти вниз чтобы снова выйти вверх. В подземелье находится «Ночной мир». Там вы видите животных, которые ночной активны. Животные, нанесенные на карту, такие как BOPOH, - это птицы в клетке, которые находятся на слое 0. Пешеходная дорожка на слое 0, чтобы увидеть этих птиц, еще должна быть нанесена на карту и находится снаружи (юго-западнее) здания.
Не могли бы вы пересмотреть и повторно отобразить снова, пожалуйста.
literan (2018-08-27 20:20:35+00:00): thanks for your reply, I will answer you tomorrow
literan (2018-08-28 17:42:55+00:00): I've found this building's (or structure's) photo: http://wikimapia.org/#lang=ru&lat=55.763658&lon=37.577405&z=17&m=b&show=/6775895/ru/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8/photo/4650433 - it's simply the building. So, current tags on footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619759962/history (highway=footway+indoor=yes) seem to me proper. Tag tunnel=yes is for tunnels (when we have some ground, cliff or soil over the highway) and is redundant here.
literan (2018-08-28 17:43:53+00:00): Look at wiki, please: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
Nordpfeil (2018-08-29 19:24:39+00:00): OK, I agree. I added for the underground highway "level=-1" and the footway upstairs outside and the steps on both sides (thank you for the link with the fotos in Wikimapia).
Thanks all. Best regards.
LeifRasmussen (2018-08-26 21:52:31+00:00): Should name:en also be changed to United States?
kocio (2018-08-26 22:45:11+00:00): Yes, it should be coherent. Why do you ask, didn't I do it?
kocio (2018-08-26 23:16:29+00:00): Well, I didn't... Now the whole set is fixed. Thanks for noticing!
LeifRasmussen (2018-08-26 23:18:18+00:00): Thanks for doing this!  I can't wait for the change to show up on the main rendering.
kocio (2018-09-02 09:56:33+00:00): It's visible now. :-)
Negjana (2018-08-30 20:45:28+00:00): So ein Schwachsinn. Zwischen Groß Schweinbarth und Bad Pirawarth verkehren nach wie vor planmäßig Personenzüge.
Kinimod2912 (2018-08-31 04:51:45+00:00): Also der Beitrag stimmt definitiv nicht, dass bald wieder welche fahren, weil es fahren keine auf dieser Strecke und man findet auch keinen Fahrplan bei den ÖBB.

Ab Bad Pirawarth dürften welche fahren, war dann versehentlich!

https://www1.meinbezirk.at/gaenserndorf/c-freizeit/bad-pirawarth-sulz-die-nebenbahn-nimmt-wieder-fahrt-auf_a1681722
abrensch (2018-08-27 07:06:22+00:00): Hallo Bicycle Tourer

was tust Du da?

In der Summe hast DU einfach eine Abbiegebeschraenkung hunzugefuegt, naemlich die von Südend kommend nach rechts auf die L 220, und die ist im Sat-Bild ganz eindeutig widerlegt!
Bicycle Tourer (2018-08-27 11:23:43+00:00): Hallo Abrensch,

Ich vermute, dass Du Dich mit der zitierten Turn-Restriktion auf den changeset 61999351 beziehst. Ich habe dort einen Kommentar dazu eingefügt.

Zur Erläuterung des vorliegenden changesets: Ich habe rund um diese Kreuzung die einzelnen Straßen in ihrem Verlauf besser auf bing gelegt (nachdem das Bing-Bild mit GPS-Tracks aligned wurde). Ich habe das gemacht, um anschließend in einem separaten changeset die Route der B33 (Relation 3499307) korrekt über diese Kreuzung hinweg mappen zu können (changeset 61999595). Die Route war im Bereich der Kreuzung mit veralteten Rollen "oneway" dargestellt und hatte Lücken.
abrensch (2018-08-27 19:08:49+00:00): Ja sorry, gemeint war CS 61999351 , siehe also dort.
Bicycle Tourer (2018-08-27 11:22:57+00:00): Hallo Abrensch,

danke für Deinein Hinweis unter changeset 61999291 auf die turn_restriction. Sie ist in der Tat falsch, es hätte ein "no-u-turn" mit der service-road nach Süden sein müssen. Sorry, das hätte ich richtig machen müssen. Es ist inzwischen korrigiert.

Zu meiner "Ehrenrettung" kann ich nur sagen, dass ich bei der Arbeit an der Kreuzung darauf gestossen war, dass die Abbiegung von der L220 aus Osten auf die B33 nach Süden durch einen oneway-tag (verbotene Fahrtrichtung Ost->West) unmöglich war, was konträr zum Satellitenbild einer expliziten Abbiegespur und Straße für diese Abbiegung sowie dem bereits vorhandenen Mapping derselben war. Das habe ich in diesem changeset korrigiert. Da man bei Benutzung von Ost nach West theoretisch auch geradeaus auf die B33 in Richtung Westen fahren könnte, habe ich eine Turn-Restriction zur Verhinderung hinzugefügt. Und die anderen beiden Turn-Restrictions, die ebenso nicht erlaubte Benutzungen dieses Knotens ausschließen sollten, gleich miterledigt, was leider bei einer der beiden zu diesem Fehler geführt hat, sorry.
abrensch (2018-08-27 19:08:13+00:00): Hallo Bicycle Tourer, ja alles cool, Ehrenrettung brauchts da nicht, wir haben alle dasselbe Ziel.

Meins ist, das Strassennetz zusammenzuhalten, siehe dazu im Forum diesen Thread: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59957

Du bist in den letzten Tagen bei meinen Reviews halt so bisschen zum Dauergast geworden.

Aber zu der Frage des Linksabbiege-Verbots von der L220 nach Süden (was vor wie nach Deiner Änderung in Kraft ist): hast Du da Vor-Ort Informationen. Auf Mappiliary war das 2017 vorläufig abgesperrt. Sieht mir so aus, als wäre das jetzt dauerhaft, zumal der Mapper, der das eingetragen hat (Peilscheibe) sehr erfahren ist.

Nix für ungut, weiter viel Spass beim Mappen,

Gruss Arndt
abrensch (2018-08-29 06:50:00+00:00): Hallo Bicycle Tourer, hab' von den beiden ersten findings auf die schnelle jetzt nur einen wiedergefunden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61909982
Das war eine Node-Dublette. Gruss, Arndt
geow (2019-01-22 23:34:00+00:00): Hi Yeti-17, thanks for your contribution to the OSM database! 

You've added quite a few stupa around Swayambhunath in this CS, like 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619948065

Are you sure these are stupa and not chorten? 

Thanks
geow
Yeti-17 (2019-01-23 16:24:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61999367
Yeti-17 (2019-01-23 16:25:25+00:00): Dear geow,

stupa and chorten are different names for quite the same building type. Stupa here in Nepal say the Nepali, chorten the Tibetan people. But the meaning is the same.

Greetings from Nepal!
geow (2019-01-23 21:57:57+00:00): Namaste Yeti-17, thanks for your insight, lesson learned ;) 
So stupa/chorten came in a wide variety of sizes from big dome shaped like in Bodnath to smaller rectangular ones like https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Chorten_and_barley_fields.jpg or https://www.nepalmotherhousetreks.com/uploads/gallery/Trek-in-Dolpo.jpg

I wonder, if the smaller ones are better tagged as historic=wayside_shrine instead of place_of_worship ?

Another question: How do you call the stone piles with prayer flags, often found an mountain passes in tibetan regions of Nepal- is it lhato?

Thanks
geow
Yeti-17 (2019-01-27 16:01:14+00:00): Yes, it is lhadse or lhatho, both tibetean names, no nepali similar. This is also both, so you can tag as place of worshig or wayside shrine, many of them don't exist in OSM.
geow (2019-01-27 16:09:33+00:00): Oh, thanks so much! I've added some from my last trek to Dolpa: 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/FAg
geow (2020-02-23 20:35:55+00:00): Hi again Yeti-17, just a short hint - maybe you are not aware that we don’t use the name-tag to describe things. So it would be beneficial if you would change name=stupa to description=*.

Thanks for improving OSM.
Alexander-II (2018-08-30 18:45:43+00:00): Deleted name:ru. Added word "stadium" in names (It's clear that it is stadium from leisure=stadium tag. It's not a part of the name)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61999477
stadiaarcadia (2018-08-31 06:38:25+00:00): Officially "Stadium" is part of the stadium name, but most common used name might indeed be without the "Stadium" in its name.
highflyer74 (2018-10-05 13:47:41+00:00): Hello! You added tons of "hotels" here. Also you added tons of relations here. Both is not correct. Please do some reading on how to edit OSM correctly. This changeset will be reverted. If you have questions, please ask before doing any more edits and also please read through the follwing link:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
highflyer74 (2018-10-05 13:50:27+00:00): In addition to that, your changeset comment "recently constructed" is not describing your edit. I do have local knowledge, and some of the places you changed are not new and also had been mapped correctly before. Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for further info.
GerdP (2018-09-28 09:21:09+00:00): Hi!
What is meant with highway=area on this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619958926
It looks like a landuse=farmyard to me.
opendcc (2018-08-26 10:56:43+00:00): Looks like spam. Motorway in the middle of a town, silly changeset comment ...
opendcc (2018-08-26 11:07:48+00:00): I reverted it.
POLODJANGO (2018-08-26 13:55:33+00:00): it's not spam, it's a place I know. if it's just to give info to the state it's bad!
opendcc (2018-08-26 14:07:20+00:00): Hello,

sorry. Please look at your changes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143853415 is clearly a small urban street and not a motorway (=high speed road). You may have a look at the description of tags. Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page for more information.

Some more hints:
Please don't make changes on a so large area and please write a reasonable changeset comment. Thank you.
opendcc (2018-08-26 11:07:09+00:00): Hello,

welcome to openstreetmap. You changed the content of an island and put a motorway right into urban area. Your changeset comment has nothing to do with openstreetmap. Sorry, this changeset was reverted.
abrensch (2019-09-21 08:39:23+00:00): "Die Kreisstraße A 33 bleibt zwischen Ehgatten und Streitheim voraussichtlich bis Ende 2019 gesperrt."
GOwin (2018-08-31 03:01:26+00:00): @Bucao, kindly review and fix the buildings you digitized for un-squared corners.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62000569
Alecs01 (2018-08-26 12:13:04+00:00): Why did you delete the building tag here? And how do you know Bing imagery should be better aligned? Plese STOP doing worldwide edits this way, read the wiki and try to understand how OSM works BEFORE continuing. It's hard to find any improvements in your edits. An please go on to correct your own mistakes and reply to changeset comments: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8570285
stadiaarcadia (2018-08-26 12:32:36+00:00): Please take a better look at my edits, this is really how the stadium looks like from above. I can't remember deleting the building tag, did I do that? I've added it now. I will read, but please also understand that if I do a lot of edits, it won't be 100% perfect, none of the editors do 100% perfect work. Please give me time to learn things, and please don't stop giving me tips.
Alecs01 (2018-08-26 12:37:32+00:00): And how do you know Bing is accurate here? Are you a local?
SomeoneElse (2018-08-29 08:31:10+00:00): Hello,
Please use changeset comments - it helps other mappers understand what has changed.
Best Regards,
Andy
FreedSky (2018-09-04 05:23:03+00:00): Thank you, if I feel the need to explain, I will leave a message.
SomeoneElse (2018-09-04 07:19:23+00:00): No - please try and explain whether you feel the need to or not!
Other mappers may not understand the reasons behind your change (especially in contentious border areas) - changeset comments help everyone to understand.
StefanB (2020-01-27 14:22:09+00:00): Are you 100% sure that marina Parentium is here??
I know it was 2 bays to the north: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=45.2043&mlon=13.5899#map=15/45.2043/13.5899
SomeoneElse (2018-08-26 12:43:36+00:00): Can you explain what "Stadium improvements" you made here?
SomeoneElse (2018-08-26 12:43:41+00:00): Kun je uitleggen wat "Stadionverbeteringen" je hier hebt gemaakt?
stadiaarcadia (2018-08-26 12:56:54+00:00): The field is located in the central part between the four stands.
SomeoneElse (2018-08-26 13:32:43+00:00): What was the problem before?
Commodoortje (2018-08-26 15:06:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Commodoortje (2018-08-26 15:12:56+00:00): highway=rest_area is een parkeerplaats (meestal) langs een autobaan. 
Deze node heb ik inmiddels verwijderd.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5858569590
Er was in mei al een polygon aangebracht dat er landgebruik in ontwikkeling was, de wegen op de parkeerplaats waren al aangebracht. Ik heb landuse=construction omgezet naar amenity=parking.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496700992
Commodoortje (2018-08-26 15:17:30+00:00): De camping was reeds aanwezig, ik heb de node inmiddels verwijderd.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52994722
viloan (2018-08-26 08:39:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!