piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kapazao (2022-04-21 14:22:38+00:00): Buenas, siempre que puedas deja alguna referencia de donde obtienes los datos de los comercios, que no parezca que te los has inventado o copiado.
Al menos indica si los obtuviste de un paseo, imágenes a pie de calle o añádeles más etiquetado donde aparezcan las referencias. Es muy interesante tener datos como sitio web, algún contacto y dirección. Así se puede luego revisar mejor.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120001811
alex_lofi (2022-04-21 15:09:44+00:00): Hola, tienes razón, no sé por qué pensé que OsmAnd lo añadía directamente como StreetComplete pero no.
Los negocios que estoy añadiendo lo hago cuando voy andando, porque faltan muchísimos todavía. Añadiré webs si las veo.
Lo tendré en cuenta para la próxima.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120001811
lsssmmns (2022-04-21 23:47:52+00:00): #uclamapathon2022
kapazao (2022-04-21 14:20:24+00:00): Buenas, si el kiosko no está operativo, el etiquetado debería ser disused:shop=kiosk solamente. Si se pone shop=kiosk es como si estuviera funcionando.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120002070
lsssmmns (2022-04-21 23:48:03+00:00): #uclamapathon2022
ma-rt-in (2022-04-21 18:47:08+00:00): Hey,

zur Info, du hattest du das wastewater_plant das MP zerstört.
Habe es gefixt.

vg
kartler175 (2022-04-22 16:33:04+00:00): "inner" von was?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14062996
Scout Jens (2022-12-27 14:13:18+00:00): Was meinst Du mit der Lärmschutzeinhausung? Komische Attribute (tunnel?). Ich habe da nichts gesehen und momentan wird dort auch die Autobahn erweitert. -> löchen?
***juggernaut*** (2022-12-27 14:56:55+00:00): Die Lärmschutzeinhausung (=Tunnel) ist Teil des Autobahnausbaus und dieser ist im Bau
kartler175 (2022-12-27 16:01:56+00:00): Du hast die Einhausung als Multipolygon aus lauter Mitgliedern mit der Rolle "inner" angelegt, Logischerweise muss es zum "inner" aus ein mindestens ein "outer" geben.
Scout Jens (2022-12-28 07:44:15+00:00): Hallo juggernaut, ich glaube, dass ich nun verstehe. Die Linie soll anzeigen, wo die Autobahn mal eingehaust sein wird. Das könnte man mit einer Notiz erklären. Für Leute wie mich ;-)

Und Kartler meint die Baustellenflächen.  Multipolygone sind sein Spezialgebiet. Da bin ich raus.

Viele Grüße, Jens
lsssmmns (2022-04-21 23:48:22+00:00): #uclamapathon2022
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-04-21 14:01:08+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJTUEVFRF9MSU1JVCI6WzAsOTk5XX0%3D&location=28.884756%2C-82.527081%2C17.80
Marych_ (2022-04-25 13:02:55+00:00): Просьба
при адресации указывать в 

addr:street как указано в name на линии улицы
BubbaJuice (2022-05-06 04:12:15+00:00): What is the source this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053636223) is from the Nature Conservancy?
karson_ (2022-05-06 14:00:51+00:00): Pima county's interactive GIS service, PimaMaps, says it is managed by The Nature Conservancy
BubbaJuice (2022-05-07 18:42:40+00:00): In no way does it say that. https://gis.pima.gov/maps/detail.cfm?p=114120800
BubbaJuice (2022-05-07 20:42:33+00:00): I did not see their preserve layer. I see it now.
Tomas Straupis (2022-04-22 11:07:10+00:00): Yra gatvė, yra :) Ir adresai su šita gatve yra :)
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-04-21 14:09:06+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJTUEVFRF9MSU1JVCI6WzAsOTk5XX0%3D&location=28.402865%2C-81.590510%2C18.73
timmito (2022-04-21 14:26:21+00:00): Hallo flothi, Danke für die Aktualisierung. Bitte noch den alten Straßennamen wieder als old_name ergänzen, damit diese Information nicht verloren geht. Damit kann die Straße weiterhin als Danziger Freiheit in der Suche gefunden werden. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:old_name
flothi (2022-04-21 14:34:50+00:00): Jipp, ist ergänzt
BikePC (2022-11-04 14:46:47+00:00): Dit geldt alleen van 1-april tot 1 november. Zie besluit Gemeenteblad 2022, 419781: https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/gmb-2022-419781.html
En het besluit dat inderdaad per 1 nov. het tijdelijke voetgangersgebied is opgeheven: https://www.waddinxveen.nl/verkeersbesluiten-2022-week-38.
Zou je de tagging conform willen aanpassen? ter info: afgelopen woensdag met een fietsgroep van zuid naar noord hier gereden richting Noordkade zonder enige belemmering.
MoiraPrime (2022-04-22 14:10:20+00:00): Hey Lance Cooper. I appreciate your participation in the project. I just noticed some of your edits don't follow the tagging guidelines, but it's no big deal. Most of it is minor stuff. 
I do want to suggest you head over to the wiki and read up on this page on Editing Standards and Conventions over on the OSM wiki. It has a lot of things in it that helped me figure out the most correct way to tags things when I was first learning OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions
ivanbranco (2022-04-21 15:33:10+00:00): Hi,

please see:
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119916805
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116239970

these are a comment from 3 months ago and 2 days ago, and yet you're still adding invalid values for place tags. Can you check it out please?
DanSpen101 (2022-04-21 14:18:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DanSpen101/traces/4273118
eggie (2022-04-28 11:21:09+00:00): Dag Mavasni.. access=yes kan ook problemen geven. Geen combinaties maken net .................=destination of no en dan access=yes taggen.
Ik heb access=yes verwijderd.
moped en mofa =yes toegevoegd. Die zijn uitgezonderd van c12. OSM ziet die categorie als motorvoertuigen.
MVG
eggie
Mavasnl (2022-04-28 11:27:38+00:00): Ok, duidelijk.
Gr Mario
V-Li (2022-04-22 05:07:05+00:00): Hallo, Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160655818 schneidet den Bach, ohne die Querung zu definieren.  Ist hier eine Furt oder ein Tunnel?
Violaine_Do (2022-12-07 22:02:05+00:00): Could you please provide some information on why you removed the retaining wall here? I can do a revert as it seems to be a mistake Thanks in advacne for your answer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120003783
Violaine_Do (2022-12-21 00:26:45+00:00): reverted
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120003783
wermak (2022-06-17 12:41:38+00:00): Hallo, 

ein geplanter Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053641402) wäre ein highway=proposed;proposed=cycleway/path.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:proposed. Wäre schön, wenn du das korrigieren könntest. 

Schöne Grüße
user_5359 (2022-04-23 12:14:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the product of your company? What is the meaning of the tag natural=geyser for you?
gurglypipe (2022-04-23 20:39:43+00:00): Hi, when making changes like this please consider splitting them into smaller, more localised changesets, and providing a summary of the changes which is specific to what you’ve actually changed.

This changeset spans Exmoor up to near Carlisle, which means that local mappers for those two areas have to verify changes they’re not familiar with.

In addition it changes the height and location of a mountain peak, and adds new megalith sites, neither of which count as “Correct[ing] tags on some stone circles”.

By splitting changesets up and providing relevant changeset comments (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) you allow others in the community to easily see and verify changes to the map.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks!
Andrew Gustar (2022-04-24 10:47:06+00:00): Many thanks for that useful feedback. I was working through a list and got a bit lazy towards the end. No excuses. I'll be more considerate to reviewers in future - it is a very valuable job!
parukhin (2022-12-01 09:48:25+00:00): Коллега, а тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053645403/
правда 2 км/ч? 
Не вижу знаков.
И тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9395279/history
Или это всё же про полосы?
literan (2022-12-01 11:36:21+00:00): конечно, про полосы. Опечатался, поправлю. Спасибо!
GinaroZ (2022-04-22 13:06:28+00:00): Hi Rob, where exactly are people wandering off onto the farm tracks - is it where the public footpath and track meets near this stile? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/780597320
canfe (2022-04-23 15:43:27+00:00): Credo possano essere integrati alcuni tag. Qui lo spunto, soprattutto per il tetto.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source%3Dsolar#Rooftop_Solar_Panels
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120004802
Skinoku (2022-04-23 16:34:38+00:00): Grazie, ho provveduto ad integrare i tag mancanti
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120004802
highflyer74 (2022-04-26 04:45:04+00:00): Auch noch eine kurze Anmerkung: schau Dir bitte genau an, welche Gebäudeteile StreetComplete abfragt. 

Wenn die Situation unklar ist, oder die Gebäudeaufteilung eine korrekte Klassifizierung nicht ermöglichst, erstelle bitte einen Hinweis mit Foto und Beschreibung, damit andere Mapper die Lage beurteilen können. Ich kann mir aus dem Luftbild heraus nicht vorstellen, dass es sich beispielsweise hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/934934266 um eine Hütte handelt (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=hut?uselang=de).

Viele Grüße!
legofahrrad (2022-04-24 15:44:46+00:00): Hallo Marius und willkommen bei OSM!
Ersteinmal, vielen Dank für deine Bearbeitung.
Du hast hier anscheinend ein ganzes Gebäude gelöscht. Ich vermute, dass das gar nicht deine Absicht war, sondern dass du nur die Bank entfernen wolltest. Beachte, dass du dann nicht das ganze Gebäude löschst.
Generell sollte sowieso häufig lieber ein Lifecycle-Prefix verwendet werden. Dazu kannst du folgenden Wiki-Artikel lesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Außerdem ist dieser Artikel ein guter Einstieg für Anfänger: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Beste Grüße, legofahrrad
PS: Bei Fragen kannst du dich gerne melden.
Ich kann deinen Änderungssatz hier rückgängig machen und die Bank dann entfernen, sodass das Gebäude vorhanden bleibt.
mueschel (2022-05-10 14:12:21+00:00): Hi,
what does 'iso3 = cod' mean? A tag like this is not used in any other place.
gscholz (2022-05-29 06:22:31+00:00): Hi LFernandoAlv,
this changeset has destroyed the residential area relation around Juticalpa:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10466669/history

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120005921

I have just fixed this, please be more careful or even better use JOSM to avoid such errors.
Guido
pio2_122 (2022-04-21 15:47:47+00:00): Przy zmianie obrysów budynków proszę zwrócić uwagę, aby nie usuwać obrysów z przypisanymi adresami i nie zastępować ich nowymi już bez adresów.
Der Bierpuncheur (2022-04-22 05:13:48+00:00): I adapted your changes to the other crossings to add uniformity. I wasn’t sure how to properly tag the crossings designated for the bicycles, but seeing your edits made it clear. Thanks! Very helpful.
bxl-forever (2022-04-22 08:06:01+00:00): For clarity, I suggest we continue the discussion under the original changeset of yours, not here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119995779
ljb_nj (2022-04-22 00:26:08+00:00): Hello, your road name change from Old Port Republic Road to Old Port Road - was this intentional, and if so based on what; or was it in error?
crystalwalrein (2022-04-30 23:18:55+00:00): All signage in the field refers to this road as Old Port Road now.
ljb_nj (2022-05-01 15:40:46+00:00): I drive by regularly and also reviewed my dashcam video. There is no road sign at the US-9 intersection. Where did you see a sign? 

US Postal Service address lookup tool, and the State's parcel database (MOD-IV), both say houses on this block have the address "### Old Port Republic Road".

At the very least, can we make one name, one alt_name?
crystalwalrein (2022-05-02 01:50:15+00:00): Signage off of Moss Mill Road (CR 561 Alternate) identifies the road as Old Port Road.
ljb_nj (2022-05-03 00:58:37+00:00): OK, thanks, I haven't checked that end. But it will be interesting to see what sign eventually goes up at the US-9 end. In the meantime, since you didn't say no, I'm adding the alt_name Old Port Republic Road with a note.
crystalwalrein (2022-05-04 22:54:17+00:00): That’s fine with me. I honestly wonder how the name change process went through Galloway Township if ‘Old Port Republic Road’ is still valid as per USPS.
eerib (2022-04-21 18:35:08+00:00): Hello bmtennat,

This trail and other associated features have been discussed previously in other changeset discussions and as such I've reverted the changeset. I've linked the previous discussions below.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118919846
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119721614

The trail was already causing incidents do in part to it's exclusion from the map. The best way to prevent further incidents or user group conflicts would be to describe the trail as accurately as possible through tags, such as sac_scale, mtb:scale, and oneway.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway

Who did you speak to at either the District of West Vancouver or BC Parks and what was their position on the trail? I currently have the trail set to access=discouraged as per previous discussions but if one of the groups has another position then we can update the access tag.

Thank you, eerib
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 13:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124777913 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6220
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:18:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778627 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 14:42:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124778923 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
multimodaal (2022-04-30 20:59:28+00:00): Je hebt hier correcte opening_hours op een route=ferry verwijderd en permissive vervangen door yes. Wil je ajb geen correcte tags verwijderen / vervangen door minder correcte tags?

Als je een tag niet snapt dan kan je altijd navraag doen bij degene die die tag heeft geplaatst.

De opzet van tags voor tijdgebonden toegang in OSM zijn helaas een zooitje, access:conditional lijdt tot een waslijst aan tags, opening_hours is veel eleganter, hopelijk vervangt die tijdgebonden access:conditional voor alle vervoerswijzen nog eens. Tot die tijd kunnen ze naast elkaar bestaan

Dank alvast!

Zie ook:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_remove_tags_that_you_don't_understand

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element#Multiple_tags

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Conditional_restrictions
BertMule (2022-05-01 16:16:09+00:00): Ik weet niet meer of ik dat zelf erbij heb gezet, maar de website lijkt me eigenlijk nuttiger, want in principe actueel.

Beide zie ik overigens niet terug via de webbrowser, noch een Android-applicatie. Dus hoe nuttig is dit alles eigenlijk?

Yes i.p.v. Permissive leek me blijkbaar logisch op basis van de website. Maar onderscheid is niet zo duidelijk.

Ik doe mijn best.

Ben erg druk geweest in dit gebied.
Net nog.
Er vallen spaanders.
olo81 (2022-04-21 16:16:26+00:00): po co takie kombinacje? Tężnia nie jest ani w budynku ani nie ma formy budynku.
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 07:02:51+00:00): https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/prawo-budowlane-16796118/art-3
a to?
olo81 (2022-06-08 13:19:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:man%20made=graduation%20tower?uselang=pl

Masz tu tagowanie teżni
Geistlich Biomaterials Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH (2025-11-27 12:55:05+00:00): Hallo, könnte bitte jemand unsere Adresse ändern? Da diese alt ist. 

Unsere neue Adresse lautet:
Geistlich Biomaterials Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH
Im Rollfeld 46
76532 Baden-Baden
Karthoo (2025-11-27 18:27:51+00:00): Hallo, ich habe die Lage der Firma angepasst, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9683069361/history#map=19/48.788963/8.184449
RemyDog (2022-04-22 21:06:08+00:00): Source correction: Maxar Premium Imagery, Mapillary
eserte (2022-04-21 19:07:33+00:00): Zumindest hier wird nur das Kabelwerk erwähnt: https://mein.berlin.de/vorhaben/2021-00212/
user_5359 (2022-04-22 15:26:32+00:00): Hello! Do you have any information about the product sold through the vending machine?
user_15227900 (2022-04-22 15:39:38+00:00): Yes, inner tubes for bikes but I couldn't find a way to tag it on mobile. Thx for asking!
user_5359 (2022-04-22 15:58:58+00:00): add the tag vending=bicycle_tube.
user_15227900 (2022-04-23 07:37:32+00:00): Thanks!
conradoos (2022-05-03 21:06:49+00:00): A co jest teraz w miejscu tego placu zabaw? 
Bo co do zasady nie używamy samego "area=yes".
jcarlson (2022-04-22 00:07:54+00:00): Looks great! If you can tell from the imagery, it's a good idea to add some kind of tag to the nodes, too, to indicate what kind of utility pole / structure they are.
rlerner (2022-04-22 04:55:55+00:00): Hey @jdcarls2 -- thanks for the feedback on this. I did place a point at each visible tower, but I'm not sure exactly what tower types to suggest they are. I believe they're all the typical wood style, but I'm not 100%. Is there a classification like "High tension" vs "typical residential"?
jcarlson (2022-04-22 11:34:01+00:00): Oh yeah! Mapping electric utilities can get super intense and detailed. I only know a bit about it myself, but take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power for examples of all kinds of stuff.
The power lines you added might even be considered "minor_line", which I forgot about until I was reading the wiki page just now. The points themselves would probably just be power=pole.
rlerner (2022-04-22 14:32:42+00:00): Thanks!
cronoser (2022-04-25 16:13:32+00:00): Hola, has indicado el camino al eremitorio como sin acceso, ¿hay alguna valla? un saludo
juparras (2022-04-25 16:32:13+00:00): Era un error. Es accesible a caminando. Lo he modificado. Saludos
Osmwithspace (2025-03-27 09:41:45+00:00): Ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053663486 eine Pfadfinder:innen Gruppe? Wenn ja, hast du nähere Informationen?
Bu-Be (2025-04-12 20:58:00+00:00): Ja, dort befindet sich der regelmäßige Treffpunkt des Pfadfinderstamms 01-08 Klein'loher Falken (Verband PfC). Ich weiß es leider nur aufgrund persönlichen Wissens und habe keine Quelle - zumindest noch nicht. Theoretisch sollte es auf dieser Karte eingezeichnet sein: https://pfc-bayern.de/pfc-vor-ort/, aber da der Stamm umgezogen und das noch nicht eingetragen worden ist, erkennt man es (noch) nicht. Ich habe aber mal eine Anfrage gestartet dass es aktualisiert wird.
Osmwithspace (2025-04-13 09:28:42+00:00): Hab eine Doppelung behoben.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164885555
iandees (2022-04-22 03:56:48+00:00): Thanks for adding to the map! These are great improvements. Keep up the good work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120008925
user_8101879 (2022-04-21 18:54:34+00:00): Hi,

what is the use of these changes? Was there a problem with my multipolygons? (something I didn't see maybe?)
I'm just asking in order to improve myself.
Best regards
Fred
kartler175 (2022-04-24 11:18:35+00:00): In my eyes it doesn't make sense to first fragment simple closed polygons, then put the parts into a relation so that a user (e.g. rendering process) can reassemble them into a closed simple polygon again.
See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Mapping_style.2C_best_practice

Tar Island for example has now 2 relations instead of 12 and 15 ways instead of 35 with a constant amount of nodes.
user_8101879 (2022-04-30 16:13:28+00:00): Hi,

In the link you gave in your comment, I can read the method B which is for me the best and the one I always use : I do not like to have 2 ways one on each other when one is enough.
The method A is most of the time the "official" method in Canada because of canvec imports which create only closed ways. But when these imports are old and obsolete, it is very difficult to fix them : so I cut old ways, kept only one and added it into 2 multipolygons.

But ok with your changeset, I understand that my work was "too much" and yours is clearly better.

Best regards
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 18:43:48+00:00): If the imagery is not enough, there is also GPS tracks supporting this.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 16:59:54+00:00): Why do you keep deleting it?
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 17:01:38+00:00): Please move it to the correct position. Don't delete and re-draw.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 17:02:27+00:00): Please don't delete and re-draw. You removed some info. Move it to the correct position.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 16:55:09+00:00): This is already in `alt_name=`. Please don't remove other names.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 17:04:13+00:00): Please don't remove other names. Add yours separatedly.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 17:30:10+00:00): That's not an English name either.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 17:05:38+00:00): Please don't remove other names. Add yours to `alt_name=-`.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 17:06:32+00:00): Please don't remove other names. Add yours to `alt_name=-`.
Frans S (2022-04-23 11:04:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
F: buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.
Buildings should be tagged as building=yes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120010046
Frans S (2022-04-23 11:05:26+00:00): Hello. Just another remark.
Please use the correct Imagery. Maxar !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120010046
abakus_uploader (2022-04-21 22:31:45+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Honey Fombuena (2022-04-27 18:05:54+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution. Just a gentle reminder to always square the buildings (select then press Q for the shortcut) before uploading. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120010340