piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Burricane (2019-12-11 22:59:30+00:00): Hello literan,

The consistency issue comes up because it is hard to verify traffic on segments. Traffic can change constantly even within hours due to a number of factors. We cannot assume only traffic from улица Вавилова is using this u-turn to get into the apartments. Any user coming from any direction can use this u-turn for multiple reasons. This is why most wikis state that slip roads or links should usually belong to the through highway they exit/enter (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary_link) because it is easier to verify. I only see you using this traffic policy to change classifications in Moscow. The rest of the Russian editors and locations use the Russian wiki policy, which states that “exits at junctions with the same importance in the road network as [classification]” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification#.D0.A1.D0.BF.D0.B5.D1.86.D0.B8.D0.B0.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BD.D1.8B.D0.B5_.D1.82.D0.B8.D0.BF.D1.8B). 

If traffic is the policy you would like to continue using please bring this up with the Russian community. Having solidified policy on the wiki would also be a good step. New editors or even veteran editors working in Moscow for the first time will not understand or be able to verify traffic unless we solidify a policy on the wiki. Russia as a whole should follow the same editing guidelines and not change based on the city you’re in.

Thanks
fpouels (2019-12-04 18:35:51+00:00): Als beginnende mapper mijn eerste rotonde toegevoegd. Gedacht aan rijrichting en roundabout tag. Relaties met buslijnen hersteld.
Leo Slager (2019-12-04 21:10:54+00:00): De rotonde is heel netjes ingetekend.
Maar de busroutes lopen op de rotonde tegen de rijrichting. Dat is soms moeilijk te beoordelen aan de lijn zelf. Daarom selecteer ik altijd de weg voor de rotonde en de weg na de rotonde. Dan volgt daaruit welk deel van de rotonde deel moet uitmaken van de route.
Kijk je daar zelf nog even naar ?
fpouels (2019-12-05 08:22:02+00:00): Inderdaad, toch een denkfout gemaakt. Ik heb het inmiddels aangepast. Bedankt voor het meekijken!
pangoSE (2019-12-06 07:23:20+00:00): Hej och välkommen till OSM.
Jag undrar om du framöver skulle kunna spara gamla noder och ändra på stigarna i stället för att radera och rita om?
Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
Läsa gärna hela dokumentet.
Mvh
pangoSE
Olla_Ko (2019-12-05 14:38:31+00:00): Hi!
Seems like you create a lot of dragged nodes with your changesets. Please check here https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=16/21.8030/88.3639
Could you please fix your changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77957219
Heinz_V (2019-12-05 16:22:03+00:00): I tried to correct these errors. I really do not know who this happened. I am sorry.
habi (2019-12-05 08:19:18+00:00): Please don't make changesets spanning nearly the whole globe. This makes reviewing them (as your requested) very cumbersome.
Carnildo (2019-12-06 08:48:59+00:00): "Living street" is pretty much a purely European concept.  If you find something elsewhere that looks like a living street, it's probably a driveway or an ordinary residential road.
skquinn (2019-12-09 04:07:56+00:00): Also, the comment of "fun" does absolutely nothing to describe the edits you've made.
ftrebien (2019-12-08 11:18:27+00:00): Legal a atualização. Só um detalhe: a faixa adicional para acessar a Inhanduí não deve ser representada como uma pista separada e sim com lanes e turn:lanes. Outro detalhe é que a avenida Divisa só passa a ser secundária quando se tornar caminho principal desde a rotatória até a Cruzeiro do Sul - e nesse caso, o trecho bela Butuí deixa de ser secundário.
Alexandre de Menezes (2019-12-08 15:52:15+00:00): OK, removi a pista separada e ajustei a classificação da divisa.   Faltou remover o antigo desvio (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623546698), que não consegui remover porque não sei o que fazer como lidar com as relações.
ftrebien (2019-12-12 11:37:32+00:00): Valeu! Pode deixar que eu ajusto a relação ali.
Gumeg (2020-01-20 08:53:11+00:00): Контур Македоновки до вас нарисовали..
jcr83 (2020-01-05 17:44:11+00:00): Es-tu certain du numéro de la balise 158 ? Sur la carte IGN, le numéro est 261.
Christouf0676 (2020-01-05 18:08:01+00:00): A vrai dire je ne peux pas certifier que c'est vraiment "158"... Je me rappelle que la balise était récente, et je sais des re-numérotations ont eu lieu.
J'avais entré le numéro dans le GPS, puis effacé le point. 
Le mieux serait une petite promenade pour vérifier !
jcr83 (2020-01-05 18:12:01+00:00): J'y suis passé cet après-midi, malheureusement je n'ai pas relevé le numéro :(
user_5359 (2019-12-04 21:08:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ralley (2019-12-04 21:10:37+00:00): This changeset has changed the highway tag from construction but hasn't removed the construction=unclassified tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77958277
ralley (2019-12-11 18:28:16+00:00): construction= now removed by original editor
Jakka (2019-12-05 06:54:25+00:00): ruelle est le nom exacte ou une description, n'est pas connecter ou nord avec Rue Ernest Mathy
pancendal (2019-12-05 07:15:47+00:00): Je connecte la ruelle.
Je ne connais pas le nom de la ruelle
Jakka (2019-12-05 07:17:50+00:00): Pas remplir tag name. Laisser vide/enlever. Merci
pancendal (2019-12-05 07:19:16+00:00): Okay :)
BCNorwich (2019-12-14 17:35:03+00:00): Hi, you forgot to finish enclosing the grassland polygon Way: 752756963
I've removed several self intersections from it.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2019-12-15 20:05:25+00:00): Way: 752756962 looks unfinished and is untagged.
skquinn (2019-12-04 20:09:38+00:00): I forgot to update the source tag; I did have Mapbox Satellite loaded as well during this edit.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-05 01:22:24+00:00): Despite the issues raised earlier at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3311 , you're still using Osmose as a "source".  Please don't do this.  By all means use it to surface data where the original meaning was clear but the result isn't formatted properly - such as changing the maxweight on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/751826175/history .  If you're going to do that though please do make it clear what changes you are making - say something like "changing maxweight values to have decimal points rather than comments as decimal points separators" rather than "because Osmose told me to".
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-12-05 01:22:53+00:00): Trotz der zuvor unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3311 angesprochenen Probleme verwenden Sie Osmose weiterhin als "Quelle". Bitte tu das nicht. Verwenden Sie es auf jeden Fall, um Daten anzuzeigen, bei denen die ursprüngliche Bedeutung klar war, das Ergebnis jedoch nicht richtig formatiert wurde - wie z. B. das Ändern des Maximalgewichts unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/751826175/history. Wenn Sie dies dennoch tun möchten, machen Sie bitte deutlich, welche Änderungen Sie vornehmen. Sagen Sie beispielsweise "Ändern von Maximalwerten, um Dezimalpunkte anstelle von Kommentaren als Dezimalpunkttrennzeichen zu verwenden" und nicht "weil Osmose es mir gesagt hat".
Freundliche Grüße,
Andy
Mond00 (2019-12-05 11:39:01+00:00): Wenn ich es nun richtig verstanden habe, kann ich mir weiterhin auf der Webseite Osmose Probleme anzeigen lassen. Nach der Anzeige kontrolliere ich den Vorschlag, ob dieser in Ordnung ist. Danach bestätige ich die Korrektur.
Wenn z. B. ein Punkt durch ein Komma ersetzt habe oder eine Einheit entfernt habe, trage ich beim Änderungssatz: „Punkt durch Komma ersetzt / Einheit entfernt und Werte nicht verändert“ dann ein?

Wenn ein alter Begriff ersetzt wurde z. B. footway in sidewalk´, trage ich beim Änderungssatz:  „footway in sidewalk geändert ohne den Wert zu verändern“ dann ein
SomeoneElse (2019-12-05 12:15:22+00:00): I don't think that anyone will complain aboout changing an obviously numeric value from "3,5" to "3.5" (but of course you do need to check every object to see that the change is sensible), but chaging "footway=both" to "sidewalk=both" is NOT something that you should do without discussion - see the mechanical editing rules that i've told you about before - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
SomeoneElse (2019-12-05 12:15:48+00:00): Ich glaube nicht, dass sich jemand beschweren wird, einen offensichtlich numerischen Wert von "3,5" auf "3,5" zu ändern (aber natürlich müssen Sie jedes Objekt überprüfen, um festzustellen, ob die Änderung sinnvoll ist), sondern "footway =" both "to" sidewalk = both "sollten Sie NICHT ohne Diskussion tun - lesen Sie die Regeln für die mechanische Bearbeitung, über die ich Sie zuvor informiert habe - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
Mond00 (2019-12-05 20:40:01+00:00): Danke für die Antwort, das ich noch Dezimalfehler korrigieren kann. Die Korrekturen wurden vor dem absenden auch geprüft. Manchmal gab es auch mehr wie einen Fehler im Eintrag.

Die footway Einträge werde ich nicht mehr ändern. Ich hatte im wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:footway vorher gelesen, das der Wert alt ist und durch sidewalk ersetzt wurde. Daher ging ich davon aus, das die Meldung bei Osmose richtig waren und ich hatte mir diese einzeln vor der Korrektur angesehen. Wie geschrieben lasse ich es nun!
SomeoneElse (2019-12-05 20:41:58+00:00): Danke!
aharvey (2019-12-05 02:33:15+00:00): What was the reasoning for removing service=emergency_access here? As far as I can tell this is a well documented and use tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Demergency_access and it's fair to assume that this track of primarily for fire fighting purposes.
aharvey (2019-12-05 01:13:24+00:00): I'm surprised this is foot=no, what's on the ground that indicates foot=no?
Cola2019 (2019-12-05 02:17:57+00:00): I didn’t add that tag, just updated emergency vehicle access. Feel free to add footway if need be.
Cola2019 (2019-12-05 02:19:58+00:00): Also if you look on google earth imagery you’ll see this is a private road. Access needs to be granted to use.
aharvey (2019-12-05 02:26:55+00:00): Maybe you didn't realise you did, but you have https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77959014/.

You can't use Google as a source as you don't own that data, but besides how can you tell from satellite imagery if a road is private or not?

I'll revert your changeset.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-12-08 20:32:26+00:00): boa noite, qual a fonte destes dados?
zermes (2019-12-20 17:14:37+00:00): como indicado na etiqueta source (para além de indicar a camada das imagens de satélite): "survey", ou seja, levantamento feito no terreno. Fiz alguma coisa errada ou estranha?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-12-20 17:41:44+00:00): adicionar 6500 elementos numa só edição com o nível de detalhes que colocou é improvável. daí a solicitação de esclarecimentos, já que é impossível ser survey atendendo às diferentes temáticas que adicionou.
andergrin (2019-12-07 20:50:11+00:00): Добрий день. Дякую, що додаєте нові данні на мапу. Я помітив, що ви випадково продублювали існуючі дороги, додаючи до них нові теги, а також не з'єднали точки доріг. Якщо вам потрібна допомога у виправленні чи інші консультації, звертайтесь в телеграм-канал української ОСМ спільноти https://t.me/osmUA
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:43:12+00:00): Hi greenmapper,
your recent changesets have left behind several errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-58.50925&lat=-3.07930&zoom=12&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

Guido
SomeoneElse (2020-01-05 10:55:53+00:00): Hello clay_c,
Is there a definition of railway-halt for the US that you're using anywhere?  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=halt just says that this "might differ from country to country"; if there was a shared definition in use anywhere it'd be good to have it to link to.  I'm just asking here because at the DWG we were asked about it, and this changeset changes a number of places to halts.
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)
clay_c (2020-01-05 16:27:43+00:00): Hi Andy,

I'm using the definition of a railway station without switches or crossovers, as in the German examples on the wiki. Unstaffed-ness happened to be a convenient heuristic to find such stations. I visually checked each one to see if there were switches nearby or not.

Best,
Clay
SomeoneElse (2020-01-05 17:27:34+00:00): Thanks.  Is that definition widely used in the US as well as in Germany-speaking countries?  As far as I can tell it isn't in the UK, for example.
Minh Nguyen (2020-01-05 19:18:20+00:00): That definition isn’t generally used in the U.S. railway=halt is used for flag stops. Some unstaffed Amtrak stations are flag stops, but for instance the Oakland-Coliseum/Airport station (OAC) is a fixed stop, about as built up as most stations along commuter rail lines. An extreme example is Cincinnati Union Terminal (CIN), one of the largest station buildings in the country, now tagged as a halt because Amtrak replaced the ticket counter with a vending machine during a recent round of layoffs.

(What’s more, some tram systems as a rule only stop when flagged, but we’re still tagging all the stations as stations rather than tram stops, because Americans don’t expect rail passenger facilities to be as built up as in Europe.)
clay_c (2020-01-05 19:23:04+00:00): I don't think people generally understand the distinction between a station and a halt in North America, unless they're railroad employees or otherwise have sufficient technical knowledge on railroad operations. I think it's inaccurate to say this definition isn't generally used in the U.S., since I have in fact come across other mappers' work where they mapped according to the "no switches" definition. Perhaps we should say there isn't a consensus yet.
Minh Nguyen (2020-01-05 19:34:53+00:00): What’s the rationale for making so many stations into undifferentiated halts, other than a rule on the wiki that was meant for very different countries? The distinction between fixed stops and flag stops is common among American passenger rail systems (and bus and light rail systems for that matter).

Amtrak is unique in that they don’t have to remind passengers to flag down trains at flag stops, since the reservation system does it for them electronically. But try explaining to a layperson that Cincinnati’s grand terminal is but a halt because there are no switches visible in aerial imagery. And consider what impact the German rule would have on other rail systems: a distinction based on the presence of switches, which is much more arcane than a flag stop rule that passengers get reminded about.
clay_c (2020-01-05 20:11:40+00:00): What makes the presence of switches "arcane"? They're quite important in railroad operations and scheduling. The halts are all tagged simultaneously as public_transport=station and train=yes, which I would argue are the tags relevant to passengers.

Cincinnati Union Terminal has a large, ornate station building, for sure. It certainly was at one point a "station". As of today, that station is a freight yard with a single passenger platform on the side. The switches belong to the yard, not the passenger platform. I don't think a large headhouse or a historical status as a station are enough to call it a station today. 

As I understand it, the public_transport tag contains the relevant information for passenger operations and the railway tag is for underlying infrastructure of railways. I hope I'm helping by exposing this distinction to the public by tagging halts. To change them back to stations, I'd have to add something like note="missing switches" to avoid losing information, and I'm reluctant to do that.

Best,
Clay
Minh Nguyen (2020-01-05 21:07:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dhalt primarily refers to size, the presence of a platform, and whether trains stop always or only by request. If you had instead changed these nodes to railway=halt on the basis that there’s no shelter or station building, that would’ve better fit the documentation and thus data consumers’ expectations.

The rule about the presence of switches is specifically for German-speaking countries. Back in 2015, a mapper edited the page to apply this definition to the whole world, seemingly without discussion, but that change was reverted several months later. It’s possible that some of the switch-based tagging you’ve seen was from that time period. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:railway%3Dhalt&action=history

For this rule to be adopted in North America as well, it would need to be discussed on talk-us or at least OSMUS Slack. This changeset comment thread isn’t enough because the switchover to railway=halt happened across multiple changesets. Together, they affected roughly 60% of all Amtrak stations nationwide, but only Amtrak stations, so now the map is inconsistent within the U.S. I’m not saying you necessarily have to go through the whole mechanical edit process, since you went through the trouble of manually inspecting each stop. But data consumers and other mappers should be kept in the loop about the changes taking place.

By the way, you can map the switches themselves as railway=switch nodes. That way we won’t lose information about switches no matter how the discussion turns out. I’m unaware of a special tag for distinguishing flag stops, since that was the original meaning of railway=halt.
clay_c (2020-01-05 22:21:25+00:00): Fair enough, I'm convinced. I'll keep that in mind going forward. I should probably mention that I've been mapping commuter rail stations across the Northeast according to the switchless definition. I'll follow up in a private message about what to do going forward.

That said, the presence of switches indicates something meaningful about the station itself—that is, whether trains may terminate or reverse direction there. So if these get changed back to railway=station, I'd hope to retain the information with a tag like terminus=no.
viloan (2019-12-04 20:30:50+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-12-04 20:35:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
gendy54 (2019-12-07 19:52:21+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention quand vous bougez les chemins. La géométrie de la piste cyclable était sans dessus dessous.

Bon courage
viloan (2019-12-04 20:59:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
AndresDuhour (2022-07-18 21:18:27+00:00): Buenas tardes! Estoy revisando los nombres de calles y rutas en corrientes y resulta que no encuento la fuente para nombrar la ruta nacional 12 como "Autovía Islas Malvinas". Hubo un proyecto de nombrarla "Héroes de Malvinas" pero no se convirtió en ley.
strassenhund (2019-12-04 21:21:19+00:00): Dt. Übersetzung: Fehlende Einbahn-Spur hinzugefügt.
topolusitania (2019-12-04 22:41:11+00:00): Boa noite e bem vindo ao OSM.
A que corresponde esta edição ?
Empresa ? Associação ?
JandaM (2019-12-23 11:46:19+00:00): Dobry den,
  prosim nepouzivejte jako podklad pro obreslovani budov ortofoto od BINGu. Neni zarovnane a objekty jsou az o 10 metru posunute. Jedna se o pomstu od M$
viloan (2019-12-04 21:51:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!