piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2021-12-05 23:32:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MitjaJez (2021-12-15 22:11:07+00:00): That means that we need node for municipality to hold this Tag:place=municipality

Building like way/36659865 cannot hold it.
ivanbranco (2021-12-15 22:16:27+00:00): A place=municipality for Monrupino was already present: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4450455965/history

We could revert it and put it as "label" member, are you ok with that?
MitjaJez (2021-12-16 17:46:29+00:00): I'm wondering why is tag place=municipality is proposed to use on node only. However statistics shows wide use on relations.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=place&value=municipality
ivanbranco (2021-12-16 22:22:43+00:00): Wide us in relations, but not in Italy though. Most of the place=municipality tags to boundaries in Italy were added mostly by one user (the one you reverted one month ago with "Resolving vandalism" and that got 6 blocks in a month). At the moment there's only one place=municipality added to a relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/41025) in Italy, and was added two days ago (I will fix it soon though).

Also we talked about "comuni sparsi" (as Monrupino is) in the mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2021-November/073080.html
Here everyone agreed about adding the "comune sparso" place as a node (even though somebody said it should be a "village" and somebody a "municipality")

And about place tag to boundaries more recently: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2021-December/073213.html (and the two user who replied as far agree about not using place tags on boundaries).

Based on what we said on the mailing list, I still believe that revert the deletion of the place=municipality node of Monrupino and adding it as "label" member (as all others "comuni sparsi" in Italy are tagged) is the best choice.
push-f (2022-06-23 22:40:50+00:00): This change added the way 1009307355 to the relation 2689634 (which is the EuroVelo 10 superrelation). As per the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/EuroVelo) ways should not be added directly to superrelations.
Supaplex030 (2021-12-05 22:29:56+00:00): Huhu, du hast hier extra eine Verbindung von der Rampe zur Sporthalle zur Straße "wieder hergestellt", obwohl solche Verbindungen bei separaten Gehwegen eigentlich unnötig sind. Bzw. nur dann nötig sind, wenn der Weg tatsächlich z.B. über einen abgesenkten Bordstein zur Straße geht (weil er z.B. auch von Rettungsfahrzeugen/Dienstleistungsfahrzeugen etc. von der Straße aus erreicht werden kann). Das ist hier aber nicht der Fall, oder? (Habe die Verbindung gerade schon wieder entfernt, nicht wundern.)

Bei der Gelegenheit noch ein zweiter Tipp: Wenn du einen Gehweg an einer Bushaltestelle vorbei zeichnest, kann es nützlich sein, eine kleine Verbindung vom Gehweg zur Bushaltestelle (dem Knoten mit "highway=bus_stop") zu mappen, dann kann ein Router direkt den Weg finden. Hier ist ein Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009387179 (das "footway=link" ist glaub ich undokumentiert, aber nutzen einige Mapper für solche eher "virtuellen" Verbindungen.)

P.S. Ich arbeite mich in den nächsten Tagen im Körnerkiez langsam mit den Gehwegen nach Süden - bin nicht ganz so schnell wie du, weil ich gleich vor Ort die Bordsteinhöhen, Oberflächen und Breiten angucke und mitmappe ;)
Gnurpsnewoel (2021-12-06 00:36:10+00:00): Ja, geht klar an der Herthabrücke, dass das wieder draußen ist. Ich war mir darüber unklar, inwieweit es zu löschen ist.
SimonPoole (2021-12-29 15:12:57+00:00): Partially undone in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115524460#map=12/46.4671/9.8539
G_P_J (2021-12-06 12:35:40+00:00): Cześć, 
Twoje importy wygenerowały adresów duże braki w nazewnictwie ulic. Czy będziesz usuwał te braki? Braki widoczne są w Mrówkach:
http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy/#9/52.2455/15.6143

Pozdrawiam,
Piotr
Cristoffs (2021-12-06 13:11:16+00:00): Się "podłączam" pod pytanie.
user_4493657 (2021-12-06 18:32:47+00:00): Cześć.
Oczywiście. Taki był plan. Teraz widać braki, jednak uzupełnianie ulic jest procesem wolniejszym.
maraf24 (2021-12-07 23:31:34+00:00): Wypadałoby z tydzień odczekać z krytyką :)
G_P_J (2021-12-08 15:07:31+00:00): Stwierdzenie faktu i zdanie pytania, to już krytyka? Ciekawe... Niestety z doświadczenia wiem, że czekanie z informacją, że coś jest nie tak, najczęściej kończy się sprzątaniem przeze mnie. Ostatnio po takich importach innego edytora sprzątałem okolice Grudziądza przez 3 tygodnie. Mam nadzieję , ze tutaj będzie inaczej. I tak pomagam to uprzątnąć. 
Pozdrawiam,
Piotr
maraf24 (2021-12-09 00:25:51+00:00): Stwierdzenie faktu, ale jakiego? Bo w oryginale jest "importy wygenerowały duże braki w nazewnictwie ulic." Te importy żadnych braków nie wygenerowały, braki były wcześniej, dzięki importowi zostały wykryte.
Dalej: "czekanie z informacją, że coś jest nie tak, najczęściej kończy się sprzątaniem przeze mnie. " - niby co jest nie tak z tymi adresami? Są błędne? Nieaktualne? Takie ulice nie istnieją? Obejrzałem te dane i nie widzę tu nic do sprzątania. Jeśli się mylę, podaj linki.
I na koniec: skomentowałeś zestaw gdy nie upłynęła nawet doba od jego utworzenia, a tylko nieliczni są etatowymi edytorami osm :P
G_P_J (2021-12-09 08:30:41+00:00): Maraf24, czy gdybym zastąpił słowo "wygenerowały" zastąpił słowem "ujawniły", to już by Ci pasowało pytanie, które zadałem? Jest jakiś wypracowany czas od dokonania zmiany do możliwości zadawania pytań? Nie wykazuję jakiejkolwiek agresji. Po prostu zadaję proste pytanie, a zdecydowaną większość "mrówek" usuwam sam. W tym wypadku również. Uzyskałem jasną odpowiedź i dalej nie dyskutuję. Zupełnie nie rozumiem, czemu ma służyć Twoje zarzucanie mi krytyki. Wydawało mi się, że wszyscy tutaj pracujemy dla dobra tego projektu. 

Pozdrawiam, 
Piotr
lyctkel (2022-06-20 07:12:15+00:00): Привет, Мацуми,
В настоящее время я исследую некоторые редко используемые теги building=*.
В процессе я нашел https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93971391, в котором используется building=ыр.
Этот тег используется только здесь и может быть опечаткой.
Вы имели в виду building=yes
Смотрите https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building для подробностей.
Реградс,
ликбез

постскриптум. Прошу прощения за мой смешной английский, он был переведен машиной.

Переведено с помощью www.DeepL.com/Translator (бесплатная версия)
matsumi (2022-06-21 20:57:29+00:00): Hello! Bag fix.
Jose Riha (2021-12-07 20:52:08+00:00): pouzivaj prosim schvaleny source. "Ortofotomozaika SR", nie "Ortophoto mosaic Slovakia" (tento je tusim pridavany automaticky, ale nie je to spravne). Takisto source=Ortofotomozaika SR patri aj na objekty obkreslovane z tohto zdroja (teda napr. POI alebo cestu). dik, j
sipka (2021-12-08 16:44:27+00:00): ok, dik za upozernenie.
SherbetS (2021-12-10 16:25:10+00:00): thank you.
archie (2021-12-05 16:23:53+00:00): Kontakt!
leojth (2021-12-06 18:19:35+00:00): Vill du ha kontakt eller ville du bara påpeka att vi redigerar nära varandra? :)
archie (2021-12-06 18:37:51+00:00): det sistnämnda alternativet.
vasony (2021-12-31 06:56:09+00:00): Szia!

Ha átírod az utcanevet, a házszámokon lévő utcanevet is igazítsd hozzá légy szíves legközelebb.

Köszi, Tamás
ssummoner1 (2021-12-31 13:52:44+00:00): Szia!

Azt hittem az módosul magától mert nem én írtam be hanem a listából választottam ki. Azt hittem van valami pointere vagy valami ilyesmi az ilyen helyzetekre. De akkor most már figyelem ezt is. Köszönöm hogy szóltál!

Üdv: Summ
MxxCon (2021-12-05 23:01:52+00:00): What problems and mistakes did you fix?
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
Also please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets 👍
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-12-09 16:43:57+00:00): separou erradamente uma via sem que haja barreiras físicas que as separem, foi corrigido.
Lee Carré (2021-12-06 13:07:29+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
عبدالكريم يحي القرماني (2021-12-06 16:30:24+00:00): انتقل الى مارب
joost schouppe (2024-07-22 10:27:52+00:00): Hi Macumba,
What were you trying to express here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009322604/
By now, these tracks are basically non-existent; same for the paths you added just across the river. Did you survey there back then?
Macumba Macaca (2024-07-22 12:21:17+00:00): Ahh, that's a place that I did want to visit for "Paroi karstifiée de Moisnil" but never did in the end. I used too little information to draw these paths back then, I wouldn't do that nowadays. I think it's fine not having these paths on the map at all.
joost schouppe (2024-07-23 07:57:09+00:00): Thanks for the response!
MxxCon (2021-12-05 23:05:21+00:00): Hello.
You tagged this road segment as having sidewalks mapped as separate ways. However, looking at the satellite imagery here, there are no sidewalks there at all.
AlecM (2021-12-06 00:47:14+00:00): Not sure if I'm misunderstanding the StreetComplete prompt, but there's a walkway on the east side running for the entire length. I suppose calling it a sidewalk might be stretching it. I'm fine either way.
MxxCon (2021-12-06 00:55:36+00:00): Your intention was correct 🙂, however the prompt was for the south-bound side, which doesn't have any sidewalks.

The path you are referring to is more of a just a parallel footpath rather than a "sidewalk".
Sidewalks can be mapped as tags of a road segment or can be mapped as separate ways parallel to the road segment. In the first case you'd tag it as "sidewalk=yes/no/left/right/both". In the second case you'd use "sidewalk=separate" to denote that it's already mapped separately. 👍
flohoff (2021-12-05 19:26:00+00:00): Moin,  macht das man_made=telephone_box sinn? Das würde ja irgendwie nach Telefonzelle klingen die man auch noch benutzen kann was ja nicht der fall ist.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114586934
mariotomo (2021-12-06 16:32:35+00:00): bonjour VPT, bienvenue à OSM. vous voulez seulement placer votre entreprise dans la base de donnais, ou vous voulez fair plus pour aider la précision de la information de votre zone?
pas de problème si vous n'avais pas le temps, par contre il serait bien de avoir le noms de les "calles" du secteur de la ville ou se trouve votre entreprise.  ça, pour vous donner un petite indice de comment on peut aider OSM.
Visit Panama Tour (2021-12-08 13:59:02+00:00): Bonjour, mon entreprise (Visit Panama Tout) a changé d'adresse. Nous avons déménagé, Calle 3ra, dans le distrito de Reparto Nuevo, corrigemiento de Parque Lefevre.
Cristoffs (2021-12-06 12:57:21+00:00): W ten sposób się nie oznacza takich obiektów. Zapoznaj się z wiki zanim będziesz coś edytował. Poprawiłem tą zmianę
MojaAstronomiaPL (2021-12-06 13:18:37+00:00): Ok dzięki bardzo.
ovruni (2021-12-05 22:44:22+00:00): Hola, de manera similar que el conjunto de cambios, el texto "actualizacion de la ciudad" no brinda información sobre los cambios realizados, se ha retirado vía residencial, por otra parte se han agregado varios edificios de angulos agudos, los cuales no coinciden con las imagenes aereas que ha indicado, ademas de niveles con alturas que no guardan proporción.
Saludos
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
ivanbranco (2021-12-21 16:49:00+00:00): Hi Adhil,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9312737867

there's a strange place= value here, can you check it out?
Adhil@123 (2021-12-21 18:06:40+00:00): Hi, are you mentioning about addr:housenumber or anything else pls specify... This tag anganvadi is a substitute for kindergarden as brand and house no refered here is centre no of that local institution
ivanbranco (2021-12-21 19:03:54+00:00): I'm mentioning this tag: place=Chavoakkunnu 
since is not a valid value: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Values

Valid place values are stuff like city, town, village, hamlet ecc.
ivanbranco (2021-12-27 20:16:20+00:00): I found more: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eyP

it's 60 nodes with an invalid place value, can you fix them please?
H@mlet (2021-12-08 18:32:19+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai repéré un glissement de nœuds dans ce changeset, que j'ai corrigé.
Les nœuds 1768891745, 1768891748 et 134394149 étaient sérieusement décalés (voir par exemple sur https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114588612).

Par contre sur le chemin 172050101, il y a le tag cycleway:width=lane, qui ne veut rien dire, mais je ne sais pas quoi mettre à la place !
Je vous laisse corriger.

Cordialement.
Géovélo (2021-12-09 09:14:19+00:00): Bonjour H@mlet, merci pour ce retour je commence à sucrer les fraises, désolé.
J'ai corrigé le mauvais attribut cycleway:width=lane
Ben de Géovélo
kapazao (2021-12-06 14:40:53+00:00): Hi, I do not understand why do you change the name of this place to use a descriptive name, this is not correct. I will revert it. Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114588625
rene78 (2021-12-06 14:42:54+00:00): That's the Airbnb name.
rene78 (2021-12-06 14:43:28+00:00): How to distinguish it from other holiday homes?
kapazao (2021-12-06 14:53:29+00:00): I am not sure if using Airbnb data as it is shown in their website is correct here. Maybe they use a description and we should search for a reference or name and use other tags. I do not think OSM names should be like this.
Thank you for your answer. Regards.
jeslop (2021-12-06 15:09:21+00:00): The name is incorrect, is only a description and names should not be descriptive. Also, are you sure that airbnb data is not subject to copyright? The use of this data is not authorised. I will reverse this changeset.

Thanks for your help and contributions.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
rene78 (2021-12-06 15:41:19+00:00): Noted, thanks 👍
ElliottPlack (2021-12-19 02:28:51+00:00): Hi there, please do not modify existing water features this way. This should be set up as a multipolygon, not as a polygon with a random hole.

--
Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114588717
EP_Repair (2021-12-19 03:15:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115114338 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changes to water for a video game that break the way water works. ref Ticket#2021121310000109
rthik007 (2021-12-06 09:15:45+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114609870
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114588754
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114619653 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with account created to circumvent another block.
18Lub06bik92 (2021-12-05 17:22:24+00:00): mal byt GPS_lad 48.510474
             GPS_lon 17.722360
Zdroj: https://www.uniamiest.sk/zaockovanost-mesta 
som Videl Original GPS Suranice
18Lub06bik92 (2021-12-05 18:06:05+00:00): oprava::
mal byt GPS_lad 48.510474
GPS_lon 17.722760
Zdroj: https://www.uniamiest.sk/zaockovanost-mesta
som Videl Original GPS Suranice
18Lub06bik92 (2021-12-09 18:00:45+00:00): aj toto 
Veľké Kostoľany Trnavský
Slovenská republika
48.51°S 17.72°V, 
153m. n. m. 
zdroj https://www.meteoblue.com/sk/počasie/aktuálne-počasie/veľké-kostoľany_slovenská-republika_3056875
aceman444 (2021-12-11 21:23:55+00:00): Zase nesmyzelny popis sady zmien "New GPS"?

A ako ste pomocou GPS zistili kde ma byt bod oznacuji obec?

Ci dokonca nejaka zahranicna stranka o pocasi je autoritou v umiestneni bodu obce v OSM?

Prestante uz konecne s tymi nezmyslami.
rthik007 (2021-12-06 09:14:22+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114609775
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114588857
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114619653 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with account created to circumvent another block.
kapazao (2021-12-06 14:43:50+00:00): Hello, why are you changing classification of ways? do you know that you are destroying routing that you do not know in this area?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114588919
rene78 (2021-12-06 14:49:53+00:00): Calle Panaderos = tertiary? This street is nothing more than an alley 😋. I have been there recently. That's why I changed it.
kapazao (2021-12-06 15:04:30+00:00): The way classification was made to give continuity to some ways and having a better routing in the area. I am not sure if now the routing will be as good as it was. Almost every street in this area is a living_street or pedestrian. Using an upper level classification give us a better view and routing on the map, because there are ways that have more priority than others.
I got that information from townhall data and street view. I could be wrong, I am trying to keep a good routing and the best classification of ways. Regards
rene78 (2021-12-06 15:40:25+00:00): Okay, this I didn't know. If you want me to undo it just tell me. Saludos, Rene
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114619653 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with account created to circumvent another block.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114619653 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with account created to circumvent another block.
rthik007 (2021-12-06 09:06:10+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114609559
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589091
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114619653 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with account created to circumvent another block.
rthik007 (2021-12-06 09:05:54+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114609559
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589113
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114619653 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with account created to circumvent another block.
rthik007 (2021-12-06 09:01:24+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114609398
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589167
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114619653 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with account created to circumvent another block.
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:52:30+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114609084
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589345
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114619653 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with account created to circumvent another block.
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:51:22+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114609018
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589480
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:51:06+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114609018
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589539
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:48:48+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114604649
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589579
Endres Pelka (2024-05-07 17:33:46+00:00): Zrewertowane w 151021386.
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:31:54+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114608090
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589692
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114619653 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with account created to circumvent another block.
eggie (2021-12-05 18:38:37+00:00): Dag Jordan.. Je vraagt om feedback. Moet die relatie niet op alle tussenliggende delen liggen met roundtrip=yes?
jordan_osm (2021-12-05 19:17:41+00:00): Denk het wel.  Ik zag dat jij al de 2 bijbehorende openbare wegen hebt opgesplitst. Deze zitten nu ook in de relatie. En roundtrip=yes is ook toegevoegd.
eggie (2021-12-05 19:21:38+00:00): Oke  ..top!
eggie
eggie (2021-12-05 19:38:32+00:00): Maar nog wel uploaden, want het staat nog niet in de data.. gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-10 09:47:00+00:00): Nog even route=mtb op de relatie gezet.
Dan wordt deze zichtbaar op bv deze kaart.
https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=17!51.9305!6.2591
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:25:31+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114607897
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589766
Endres Pelka (2024-05-07 17:33:41+00:00): Zrewertowane w 151021386.
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:19:28+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114607821
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589829
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:17:39+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114607710
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589854
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:15:33+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114607710
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589882
rthik007 (2021-12-06 08:12:54+00:00): "Hi kristine0317,
I have removed the duplicate highway 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114607137
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114589989