piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-05 14:01:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39864464/history has name = noname that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
That is probably object without name, not object named "noname". I think that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes would work better here, should it be changed?
Adamant1 (2019-04-20 11:53:45+00:00): This is just a small grassy area going to the beach. It's highly questionable if it's a park. Otherwise, every spot on the planet with a little grass and a bench is. 

I also now for sure that Thirteenth Avenue County Park isn't actually a park, because it's mapped on top of a house. So I highly doubt this is just by association.
stevea (2019-04-21 01:22:46+00:00): Wow, a ten year old node from Ian Dees' GNIS node import which nine years ago was changed by me.  OSM got a LOT of mileage out of that, and with minimal fuss!

But since Adamant1 is fussy here and now, I discovered (from here, http://www.scparks.com/Home/Parks/ParkFinder.aspx , you might want to take a look) that it has been renamed "12th Avenue Coastal Access."

Consequently, I have (somewhat cleverly?) migrated the tags from the node to the staircase (deleting the leisure=park tag) and deleting the node.  I added operator=Santa Cruz County Parks Department to better denote that it is SCCPksDept which maintains these steps/staircase.  Done.
stevea (2019-04-21 01:29:22+00:00): I did not locate the Thirteenth Avenue node, Ian did ten years ago.  However, in addition to performing the same three operations noted above I did to "Twelfth" (operator, no leisure tag, renaming properly based on ParkFinder) the node was also moved about ten meters southwesterly to be on the "beach lobe" from the house on 13th compared to where it was before.  Done.  (It may be more correct to break apart the almost-maybe-it-does crossing multipolygon boundary — that trapezoidal "lobe," but let's see if a cleanup by SCCGIS  (v6?) and/or CPAD (v3?) does this first.  We can if they don't.
Adamant1 (2019-04-21 05:45:45+00:00): It was there a while ago, but it seems someone dealt with it. Probably you to hide your bad mapping. As far as this goes, why wait for someone else to fix it if we can just do it ourselves. That's the whole point in this. 

Also, I don't appreciate you pointlessly about being fussy. Your the one that asked me for examples and I gave them. I've your continue insulting me for know reason, let alone for doing what YOU ASKED, I'm just going to ignore you from now on. You could at least put a little effort into writing one message that doesn't involve an insult or a personal attack. Its your last warning. Either be civil, or I'm done dealing with you. 

As I've said, this is a volunteer project and its insulting to treat me like that for participating in it.
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 03:00:17+00:00): Thanks for taking care of it.
stevea (2019-04-26 03:06:47+00:00): You are welcome.  Keep up politeness, it can and does redeem you.

I haven't bad mapping 99% of the time.  1% of the time I have bad mapping.  That is OK, we (OSM) corrects our mistakes; we are human.

If I say you are 99% vituperative, yet by thanking me I say you are 1% polite by thanking me, OK.  We do better.  I'll even go to 2% or 3% progress because we've made some minor, incremental progress in other places.  There is a long, slow, hill to climb ahead, keep up the good effort!
stevea (2019-04-26 04:07:11+00:00): In short, "what you paint, ought to be good."
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 09:22:04+00:00): "That is OK, we (OSM) corrects our mistakes; we are human."

I fully agree. It's to bad you didn't apply that during all the bad mouthing of me you were doing, but such is life. At least you are now and it's better late than never.

"There is a long, slow, hill to climb ahead, keep up the good effort!"

Thanks. I agree. Same to you and don't get to discouraged or fly off the handle if things go down hill a little at some point. It's a process. As you said above, mistakes will be made, both in editing and in communication.
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-25 07:46:52+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/2332916
eggie (2017-05-08 07:20:11+00:00): PB gestuurd opnieuw welkom
marc__marc (2021-02-20 15:35:45+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39951485
it's that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bocce ?
if so, correct tag is sport=boules + boules=bocce
Regards,
Marc
saintam1 (2025-10-19 16:23:02+00:00): Regarding this 16 year old fixme, there is a sign at the corner of Rillbank Terrace that says Rillbank Crescent. I can’t tell from a survey where it becomes Melville Terrace but the current layout seems plausible and correct. I’ll remove the FIXME, i’m sure 16 years later it will be quite a relief to you 😜
Strange but untrue (2025-10-19 23:50:30+00:00): Haha 16 years later I have no memory of this whatsoever.  But relieved that past-me didn't muck things up I guess?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-27 13:34:16+00:00): what was source of this import?
zenfunk (2025-03-27 18:52:23+00:00): Hi Mateusz, I think it was me who imported the vmap0 data in OSM back in the day. It was so long ago I had to google vmap0 myself. VMAP0 is a global dataset in the public domain (see here: https://gis-lab.info/qa/vmap0-eng.html ). It is very coarse but back then, there was basically nothing in OSM for the subsaharan countries. 
Why do you ask?
Cheers, Christian
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 03:06:17+00:00): I was worried about licensing as for example this edit neither linked OSM wiki documentation (maybe it was not required at that time) nor mentions license

nice that it is not problematic then
eggie (2019-10-04 10:52:50+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. Bij deze alsnog Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
tekim (2020-05-31 18:41:23+00:00): Looks like you did an import of NHD data but didn't add OSM tags (at least not for glaciers)
repoi (2020-08-24 10:43:57+00:00): Hallo Rego_loos,
weißt du noch, woher du die Straßenbezeichnung L75 hast? Kürzlich ist eine Notiz geöffnet worden, in der diese Bezeichnung angezweifelt wird, da es sich um eine Straße in Berlin handelt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2296021
Viele Grüße
user_5359 (2019-10-10 17:03:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/201381425/history) over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.
woodpeck (2019-10-10 22:22:42+00:00): Da hast Du den falschen erwischt ;)
emvee (2024-09-08 20:00:44+00:00): Hoi Dick,

De import is ter sprake gekomen in https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/winkelnummer-tag-onlogisch/118170

Mijn vraag is waar het winkelnummer vandaan kwam, dat is niet (meer) op de website te vinden in ieder geval niet meer door mij,

Groeten,

Emvee
Warin61 (2018-10-13 04:19:05+00:00): Hello,

You have a node tagged as landuse=homestead, name=Viaduct Barn. 
Umm .. that would be better tagged as an area. And 'homestead' is not something OSM knows about, possibly landuse=residential for a homestead. But is it a homestead? Or a barn? 
I think making it an area with landuse=residential  or landuse=farmyard and name=name=Viaduct Barn could be better?
Warin61 (2016-10-05 23:53:19+00:00): Hi,
Way: Private property (40260304) is named, at least in part 'Bark Hut trail'. It is also in part inside a National Park .. so not 'Private property'. In addition hte name should not be used to signify access ...
eggie (2020-04-15 10:53:53+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage dus opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
aharvey (2025-04-15 06:43:56+00:00): Regarding Belkin Road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40306252/history do you have any feedback on if you still think it should be Belkin Road or as per Main Roads WA which uses "Grimwade Road" ?

There's been some discussion about this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164793552
Warin61 (2016-04-11 04:11:40+00:00): Hi, changed sport=shot_put to sport=shot-put, British English rather than American. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dshot-put
SomeoneElse (2022-02-20 13:35:47+00:00): Whatever it was, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40395249/history was never in a million years a recreation ground!
user_5359 (2022-04-06 09:29:32+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/40429366/history. What is the meaning of the tag streetlight = yes? Did you mean lit=yes?
sfromis (2022-04-06 10:10:19+00:00): Don't ask me. I was merely doing some corrections, not adding new features. Long time ago...

I was most probably splitting the old "Birkevænget" into two parts, as the part north of "Vestre Grænsevej" is named "Fasanvej" instead of the name "Birkevænget" still applying here.
eggie (2020-09-15 18:55:31+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Warin61 (2016-02-10 05:12:29+00:00): Way 40510826 looks to be tennis courts on Bing Imagery .. not netball and certainly not football.
SK53 (2016-02-12 12:29:24+00:00): This was mapped way before Bing imagery was available. Things may have changed of course, but as usual the best answer is a ground survey.
aharvey (2018-06-05 01:38:16+00:00): Hi, I see you added ref=TBIT here. All the signs I could see and staff I spoke with referred to this as terminal B. I couldn't see a way to have an alt ref so I've changed the ref=B. Please discuss here if you think this is wrong.
DMaximus (2018-06-05 02:24:18+00:00): This changeset is from 8 years ago, and I know the international terminal underwent extensive renovations since then. If the signs now say B then that's what the ref should be.
dieterdreist (2017-06-16 11:59:29+00:00): non mi sembra giusto. C'è una chiesa qui vicino (adiacente ad ovest), ma non mi sembra la chiesa "Sant'Antonio da Padova", vicino a Piazza Asti c'è la Parocchia dei Santi Antonio di Padova e Annibale Maria, forse c'è una confusione qui?
dieterdreist (2017-06-16 12:00:39+00:00): non conosco cosí bene la zona, vedo soltanto la chiesa nella foto aerea, ma confermo la Parrocchia in Piazza Asti...
dforsi (2017-06-17 12:17:08+00:00): Giusta osservazione ma non ti so rispondere, io spostai solamente il nome esistente da denomination a name
dieterdreist (2017-06-17 15:41:19+00:00): si, lo sò, 8 anni fa ;-)
dieterdreist (2017-06-17 15:42:01+00:00): ci dovrei ripassare 
grazie della risposta
Gemeente Evergem (2022-02-08 13:25:05+00:00): Verwijderen. Is geen openbare weg.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-09 13:46:08+00:00): Are there any surveyable traces of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/493168815/ and other nuclear test sites in ocean?

If yes, which one?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 11:26:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92272433 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google-sourced changesets from a very long time ago.
Warin61 (2023-01-08 09:26:52+00:00): HI,
This is from a long tome ago.. but just in case you do any more of these..  'x Homestead' is the name of the main residential building, while 'x Station' is the name for the farm..
MichaelCollinson (2023-01-08 21:52:51+00:00): Good to know, thank you Warin
tecsun (2016-03-20 21:21:55+00:00): feld Im Raisger 33
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-19 18:38:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40723088/history has access:psv = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using psv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/psv/&***/access%3Apsv/
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-03 17:11:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/496872403/history

What you think about changing shop=pet_accessories to shop=pet that includes shops selling pet accessories and seems to be a standard? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet

Another option could be documenting at wiki shop=pet_accessories as a separate shop value.
Aglis IRM-ED (2022-12-16 06:59:08+00:00): Hi puetti. Thank you for your contribution. I modified this object (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/40864062) because it is crossing with residential highway. thanks, and happy mapping.
HubMiner (2018-04-04 01:56:33+00:00): Hi, I noticed that many items in the area have "note" field.  I would like to start removing it, since it clutters the map in OsmAnd, and the notes don't seem to carry mapper-important info, or that info should be moved to description.  Please confirm you are ok with that.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/497415844/history
HubMiner (2018-04-04 02:17:07+00:00): Additionally: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/497415868/history

Can we delete the numbered names from nodes?  Some nodes have no valid tag, should those be deleted?
ChrissW-R1 (2023-08-04 21:06:16+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/3816869 and https://osm.org/note/3816871
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-10 05:33:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41075726/history has name = Noname that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
That is probably object without name, not object named "Noname". I think that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes would work better here, should it be changed?
jumbanho (2024-04-11 12:00:15+00:00): Fixed
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 10:37:36+00:00): I'll include this in the revert because the owner of the house at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/501215007 might be surprised to see a plane trying to land in their back garden.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-14 13:19:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136084833, 136080170, 136081647, 136082397, 136083260, 136080942, 136084063 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some bulk uploads in Nigeria.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/2529746 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-africa/2023-May/thread.html#924
malenki (2015-11-29 12:00:48+00:00): It would be nice to see a source of where this data came from and (if using it in OSM is OK) a cleanup of this import.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 10:39:10+00:00): Waterway nearby e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/501294287 has been mapped and named, and that name is likely a better on than the one from the import here
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 10:49:52+00:00): I'll revert this, but where data has been edited, I'll leave the edits.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 13:05:28+00:00): Just to note another issue with this data, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/501242848/history shows "very rounded" and likely inaccurate coordinates: 7.5833330, 11.2500000 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-14 13:19:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136084833, 136080170, 136081647, 136082397, 136083260, 136080942, 136084063 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some bulk uploads in Nigeria.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/2529746 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-africa/2023-May/thread.html#924
scruss (2016-10-19 19:01:29+00:00): Hey, your import made Worst of OSM! http://worstofosm.tumblr.com/post/149386653926/look-at-these-nicely-arranged-nigerian-villages
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-04 17:53:04+00:00): What is source of this data?

Have you discussed this import with a community?

What is the license of this data?
ivanbranco (2022-12-07 11:35:02+00:00): There are even "villages" in the middle of the Shiroro Lake: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/501516350/history
SomeoneElse (2022-12-07 12:01:22+00:00): The DWG would be happy to "just revert this" if it would make sense to - drop an email to data@openstreetmap.org.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-22 08:48:16+00:00): mass import with
fixme=no population estimate available, defaulted to village
and "Bulk" as description and no reaction to comments...

Though I am not a local mapper so I hesitate to request mass revert
DanHomerick (2023-04-24 00:18:19+00:00): Please do revert if you feel like the data is sufficiently inaccurate as to be helpful (which it sounds like is the case here).

I haven't been editing OSM for years and years --  you really don't need to wait for permission from someone who's inactive to make changes!
DanHomerick (2023-04-24 00:19:27+00:00): *is insufficiently accurate to be helpful
SomeoneElse (2023-04-27 12:19:07+00:00): I've asked at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-africa/2023-April/000919.html .
Enock4seth (2023-05-10 21:48:57+00:00): I am not in Nigeria but I agree with mass revert of nodes that haven't been changed since
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 10:49:43+00:00): I'll revert this, but where data has been edited, I'll leave the edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-14 13:19:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136084833, 136080170, 136081647, 136082397, 136083260, 136080942, 136084063 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some bulk uploads in Nigeria.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/2529746 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-africa/2023-May/thread.html#924
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 10:40:30+00:00): I'll revert this, but where data has been edited, I'll leave the edits.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 10:49:28+00:00): I'll revert this, but where data has been edited, I'll leave the edits.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 10:50:36+00:00): I'll revert this, but where data has been edited, I'll leave the edits.
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 10:50:11+00:00): I'll revert this, but where data has been edited, I'll leave the edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-14 13:19:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 136084833, 136080170, 136081647, 136082397, 136083260, 136080942, 136084063 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some bulk uploads in Nigeria.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/2529746 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-africa/2023-May/thread.html#924
joost schouppe (2018-08-04 12:58:22+00:00): Ik heb de Bontin(c)kstraat aangepast in changeset 61353099. Op de wiki staat uitgelegd hoe je dit soort situaties best aanpakt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Left_and_right_names
burrscurr (2024-05-05 17:30:23+00:00): cc https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4231621
RedAuburn (2021-09-22 01:58:53+00:00): hello name buddy
Oskarst_ (2024-04-25 08:02:54+00:00): Hei, ser det er mye aktivitet i Strava heatmap på stier som knyttes til way 41223178, men at det ikke er noen spor på denne stien. Ser den heller ikke i Kartverkets kart. Det samme gjelder for way 41224939. Kan du bekrefte at disse stiene finnes?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-11 11:26:51+00:00): What you meant by surface=interlock in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41258217/history ?
dagehol (2021-01-08 13:17:34+00:00): Please update ARU points as shown here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet#Telecoms_and_postal_services 

Otherwise you're not able to search for them. I fixed this one for you: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/504319804

Thank You!
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-07 09:43:10+00:00): What is the intended meaning of surface=interlock tag?
GerdP (2023-07-30 04:22:33+00:00): Moin!
Ist ja schon ewig her, aber ich frag trotzdem mal: War diese Route damals irgendwie ausgeschildert?
Siehe auch meine Frage hier:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/radroute-west-ost-radweg-ist-die-noch-ausgeschildert/101818
keinseier (2023-07-30 05:33:58+00:00): Ist lange her, ich weiß es ehrlich gesagt nicht mehr, es kann also durchaus sein, dass die nicht ausgeschildert ist.
GerdP (2023-07-30 15:01:54+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Wenn sich da sonst niemand meldet, dann werde ich die Relation löschen.
ElliottPlack (2016-01-12 18:37:15+00:00): some of these, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/227128783 seem to be part of ways that don't need to be deleted. Any chance for a partial revert?
woodpeck (2016-01-12 19:56:12+00:00): Don't understand - the changeset did not delete any ways, just removed some tags from nodes. The node you pointed out seems to have been part of a way that was deleted 7 months ago in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21117928/history
AnnaCatarina (2025-04-30 10:53:17+00:00): Hallo Bob, gemäß Definition für Monorails handelt es sich bei diesem System von AEG nicht um eine Einschienenbahn. Warum also wird der APM als Einschienenbahn kartiert? Gruß, Anna Catarina
Warin61 (2019-03-26 04:36:18+00:00): Deleting tags on node
506117053 no physical features, nor anything that makes sense.
Warin61 (2019-03-26 04:36:23+00:00): Deleting tags on node
506125328 no physical features, nor anything that makes sense.
AngocA (2021-12-31 20:45:11+00:00): El municipio ya está mapeado.
Gracias por contribuir en OSM https://bit.ly/osm-wiki-co Tg https://bit.ly/osm-nl #ONL
SK53 (2020-07-14 13:53:01+00:00): Hi Andy, 

I know it was a long time ago, but there doesn't seem to be any trace of this vineyard on aerial imagery anymore.

Jerry
andygates (2021-12-31 15:16:17+00:00): There certainly doesn't on recent imagery either. I'll remove it.
SK53 (2022-01-02 17:06:10+00:00): Thanks, btw still have fond memories of your blow-by-blow LEJOG!
GerdP (2015-10-29 16:41:19+00:00): please review way 41526994:
It was tagged highway=project, which is rarely used.
I've changed it to highway=proposed.
See also 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17192226
Protoxenus (2024-11-15 16:43:13+00:00): Ungelöster Hinweis Nr. 4520772
Beschreibung

Hier ist nur der Eingangsbereich der Bewohner Warnowallee 6. Es gibt hier KEIN Geschäft namens: "Leman Russische Spezialitäten".

    Erstellt von anonym vor etwa 5 Stunden
    Standort: 54,1376864, 12,0520985
!i! (2024-11-15 20:58:06+00:00): Warum kommentierst du einen 15 Jahre alten Änderungssatz? (Wo)rum geht es eigentlich?
Protoxenus (2024-11-16 15:40:06+00:00): Das ist ein Zitat aus einem Hinweis, der dort erstellt wurde. Da du den Laden kartiert hast, dachte ich, dass du darüber mehr weißt.
marc__marc (2021-03-11 12:44:03+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41596143/history
un autre contributeur https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50730988 a nomé unt racé quasi identique sous le nom d'aqueduc de Dhuis tandis que le votre se nomme Dérivation de la Dhuys.
du coup je me demandais la source du nom.
j'imagine que les 2 ne sont qu'un et qu'il faudrait les fusionner.
Cordialement,
Marc
eggie (2020-01-11 15:44:02+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage... dus opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
keithonearth (2017-02-03 03:52:49+00:00): This edit introduces some nodes with bad tagging. The ones that stand out for me are the ones with name and ele tags, and no more. The ele value is non-numerical and identical with the name. If no info is added as to what these names represent (locality, piste, etc) then I'm going to remove them.
chihchun (2016-06-26 14:51:19+00:00): soso?
keithonearth (2016-12-27 08:02:00+00:00): This changeset changes the name of Tangmarg to "Tangmarg, Jammu&Kashmir". I am changing the name back, as it is incorrect to include the state name in a village's name.
barh (2016-12-30 17:03:42+00:00): Sure. ))
Happy New Year !
gre_map (2020-11-29 19:42:01+00:00): Bonjour. Je sais que c'est vieux, mais pourquoi le chemin 41630446 a t-il été passé en access=no ? Je ne l'ai pas parcouru, mais à son extrémité sud, il n'y a rien d'indiqué.
gre_map (2020-11-29 19:56:25+00:00): Après avoir regardé l'historique des autres chemins de ce changeset, je pense qu'il y a eu confusion entre access=no et accès interdit aux véhicules à moteur. Car ce n'est clairement pas le cas pour les autres chemins (access=no indiqué partout). Je modifie et irai vérifier prochainement par acquis de conscience