piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Constable (2017-10-13 15:43:02+00:00): la descrizione di questa changeset non rispecchia ciò che è stato modificato, hai aggiunto delle panchine, non edifici, per favore utilizza dei commenti più precisi.
Tieni inoltre conto che per le panchine fa comodo aggiungere anche i tag backrest=* e material=* per indicare un eventuale schienale ed il materiale con cui sono fatte.
tonyf1 (2017-10-14 02:39:36+00:00): Hi. Welcome to Open Street Map. I am curious, you named the carpark Baba deda, despite it being associated with the golf club. Where does the name come from?
tonyf1 (2017-10-16 01:29:30+00:00): Ћао. Добродошли на мапу Опен Стреет. Радознао сам, назвао си аустралијски царпарк Баба деда, упркос томе што је повезан са голф клубом. Одакле долази име?
tonyf1 (2017-10-21 00:13:17+00:00): Hi. No reply received so I reverted with Changeset: 53116951
Constable (2017-10-13 15:40:39+00:00): non mi sembra che tu abbia aggiunto edifici non considerati in precedenza, per favore usa delle descrizioni più precise riguardo le modifiche che fai
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Inoltre il nome del centro dentistico dovrebbe essere scritto in minuscolo.
Grazie per la collaborazione, ciao
literan (2017-10-14 11:35:43+00:00): Добрый день! по поводу точек amenity=recycling
recycling_type=centre (например, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5165401691#map=19/55.67328/37.55678), это теги для обозначения пунктов приема перерабатываемых отходов (например, пункт приема лома). Там действительно не простой контейнер для раздельного сбора мусора??
eggie (2017-10-13 14:54:40+00:00): Dag Wiljon...Geef svp concreet aan wat je edit was...
eggie (2017-10-13 14:56:49+00:00): bv turnrestrictie toegevoegd
Wiljon (2017-10-14 12:27:24+00:00): ik reed op de N378 naar rechts en mocht niet naar rechts de beatrixlaan afslaan. alleen rechtdoor en linksaf was toegestaan.
ik zie ook dat ik te actief was met het wijzigen. de andere wijzigingen mogen worden geannulleerd.
Wiljon (2017-10-14 12:29:37+00:00): Dit gaat om de 52895474 en 52895431. excuses.
eggie (2017-10-14 14:04:34+00:00): De tip was alleen maar het verzoek om concreet aan te geven wat je edits zijn.
Je zou op het forum even iemand kunnen laten kijken of het goed getagd is en dan zet je deze link erbij. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52895399
forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
eggie (2017-10-14 20:46:01+00:00): ... verzoek op het forum gezet. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=668239#p668239
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-14 08:01:01+00:00): Hallo sennewald63. Kannst du dir bitte nochmal alles rund um 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355819482
angucken, da hast du `maxspeed:varible` anstatt `maxspeed:variable` getaggt, was aber in diesem speziellen Fall sogar mit dem vorhandenen  `maxspeed:variable=enviroment` kollidieren würde?!
Smiljan_02 (2017-10-14 08:19:01+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, mach ich heute noch.
eggie (2017-10-13 14:42:15+00:00): eerst maak ik een paar node los met G-toets. Wanneer splitsen niet lukt op één node. Dat lukt vaak om diverse redenen niet...dan twee nodes selecteren met de Shift toets in. Vervolgens P-toets en je kunt een kleinstukje verwijderen. 
Een heel vlak kun je ook losmaken met de G-toets.
Dus splitsen.. twee nodes selecteren vlak bij elkaar en dan P
eggie (2017-10-13 14:44:15+00:00): Wel mooi oefengebied. :)
S_Emo (2017-10-13 17:12:54+00:00): Dank je wel. Inderdaad veilig oefenterrein :)
S_Emo (2017-10-13 17:16:12+00:00): Ik zie (nu online) dat enkele reeds geplaatste (proposed) wegen weggevallen zijn na aanpassing in JOSM, Wellicht dat ik bij JOSM laden en dan kaart downloaden ze wel weer te zien krijg. Als ik online ben en dan "bewerken -> JOSM" kies, dan gaat er nog steeds iets niet goed. Maar ik heb geduld met software en mezelf :)
eggie (2017-10-13 17:20:26+00:00): Nou je kunt niet ..en  id .. en jsom tegelijk doen.
Wanneer je in id iets hebt bewerkt moet je opnieuw je gebied downloaden in josm.. wellicht gaat dat fout... en dat geldt ook anders om.
eggie (2017-10-13 17:21:15+00:00): Zet het hier wel even op construction of proposed svp.
eggie (2017-10-13 17:22:24+00:00): proposed zie je niet in de standaardkaart.. construction zie je wel
eggie (2017-10-13 17:25:16+00:00): De juiste tag is highway=construction.. niet construction yes...
Rainero (2017-10-27 19:31:36+00:00): Hallo Segg,
kannst du dir die PLZ der Häuser in Stemmen nochmal anschauen, die müßten meiner Meinung nach 31693 haben, ebenso wie das Haus Kohlenweg 50 im CS53261347.
Siehe auch hier das Qualitätssicherungstool: https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/map#16/52.3210/9.1017/osm-outsideplz

Grüße,
Rainer
segg (2017-10-28 05:34:19+00:00): Danke Rainero,
habe alles korrigiert.
Grüße
Segg
Rainero (2017-10-28 10:45:12+00:00): Das war ja schnell :)
Super, danke.
DK7080BE (2017-10-13 17:43:29+00:00): Er ruteforløbet fra Sandalvej til Herredsvej øst for Snoghøj Landevej, syd for Fredericia ikke forkert med hensyn til afstikkeren på Sandalvej. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20828#map=17/55.54630/9.72580
Hammershoej (2017-10-14 16:47:37+00:00): Jo tak, det tror jeg du har ret i. Tak for det. Jeg går hele ruten igennem for fejl sammen med én fra Vejdirektoratet når hele ruten er inde.
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:45+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45707709, 45707834, 45708129, 45708249, 45708290, 45708366, 45708511, 45708525, 45708835, 45708998, 45709203, 45709316, 45709385, 45709521, 45710194, 45710443, 45710500, 45710739, 45710862, 45711301, 45711457, 45711677, 45711810, 45713475, 45714334, 45714484, 45714524, 45714557, 45714629, 45715991, 45716159, 45716857, 45716887, 45716947, 45717121, 45717209, 45717267, 45717324, 45717444, 45717508, 45718082, 45737435, 45737493, 45737596, 45741003, 45741464, 45741534, 45745218, 45745520, 45745854, 45746145, 45746553, 45746657, 45746725, 45746750, 45769007, 45769226, 45769683.
eggie (2017-10-13 16:09:51+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd.

Mocht je de bedrijfsnaam willen verplaatsen... dan graag op de adresnode en net op het gebouw zelf.
eggie (2017-10-13 16:36:56+00:00): net moet "niet" zijn uiteraard
naoliv (2017-10-13 22:43:31+00:00): OSM Projeto, por favor, entre em contato com a comunidade brasileira antes de continuar o seu trabalho.
Os dados estão ficando incorretos da forma que você está inserindo.
OSM Projeto (2017-10-16 10:33:39+00:00): Olá, bom dia. A respeito dos erros, quais seriam especificamente? Levando em consideração que são arquivos oriundos de GPS embarcados de maquinário agrícola.
naoliv (2017-10-16 10:38:44+00:00): Os caminhos estão todos com valores que não existem no OSM
Por exemplo, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532287934
Os nós estão da mesma forma: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5165539253
Muito provavelmente esses nós não devem possuir nenhum tipo de chave ou valor.
Não dá para ver isso pelas imagens de satélite, mas todos os caminhos adicionados são cercas mesmo?
GerdP (2017-10-14 06:31:48+00:00): Hi!
Please review highway=5 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389925791
Maybe you meant addr:housenumber=5?
Reza_koulivand (2017-10-15 04:56:46+00:00): Hello! Yes, you are right, I have been trying to register the height of the building. thank you
majid1359 (2017-10-13 15:15:57+00:00): مکان تایدواتر اشتباه است پاک شد
wielandb (2021-05-31 09:15:50+00:00): Die Website, die hier eingefügt wurde, sieht nicht korrekt aus. Hat es einen bestimmten Grund, dass gerade diese Seite als website=* angegeben wurde?
PT-53 (2017-10-14 08:00:14+00:00): Hallo catweazle67,
ich habe mir gerade Deine Änderungen an der St. Michael-Kirche in Hohentengen angeschaut. Wenn Du schon meinst alle Details einzeichnen zu müssen, dann bitte aber auch korrekt mir rechtem Winkel, wo rechte Winkel vorhanden sind!!!
Ich bitte um rasche  "Nachbesserung"!
didier2020 (2017-10-13 15:34:52+00:00): hi,
your data is an import
there is no source for your tags "Layer" or "EntityHand"
there is a lot of nodes with wrongs tags like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5165539277

can you fix this ?
pnorman (2017-10-17 23:40:09+00:00): Hello,

For some reason, you've created a huge changeset that spans from Africa to Asia. Was there anything odd that you were doing?

Also, I noticed that some buildings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532298735 are traced on top of other buildings, which is an error. Do you need help fixing these?
Kirsty Owen (2017-10-23 11:52:00+00:00): Hi 
I've no idea about the breadth of the change set I didn't do anything different from my normal process.  When I click your link to the building section I can't see any of the detail.  

We were advised in sections which were marked as "residential areas" in yellow to overtrace the buildings which were present in the area though.  I'm not sure if that's what you mean?
freebeer (2017-10-24 16:04:19+00:00): Hi Paul,
It seems the last two items added were in africa where another #annoying #hashtaggy project is occurring, so somehow there must have been some overlap.
The two items before that are in Bangladesh, like those at the start I looked at.
As I've never participated in such a mapping project, I have no idea of the workflow and how one might have come to this.
(if there are additional items in the middle of the list of ways below also in africa, I did not check all, or to be honest, any of them ;-)
Kirsty, the item Paul linked to above is one of your two in Africa (a second rounded building is nearby).
You have drawn there a rectangular outline, while some months ago, a different mapper had drawn a triangular building in the same place.  Not so easy to spot without knowing exactly how to get rid of the highlighted outline when following the link Paul gave.
I am pretty sure your summary asking you to overtrace the buildings refers to what you can see in the imagery, and not what has been already drawn, in this case the triangular building.  I hope that in your workflow the already-traced outline is clear enough to discern (not only have I not participated in such a mapping project, but I have avoided trying the variety of tools available to know their weaknesses.  Plus I have not looked at the imagery in the areas to judge what you are working with, to put myself in your shoes, eating my own dogfood).
I hope that might explain things a bit better, if I am understanding correctly :-)
user_5359 (2017-10-13 17:35:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your entry.
GinaroZ (2017-10-13 16:30:43+00:00): Is there a reason why the lane has access=no?
camlewwri (2017-10-13 17:30:36+00:00): That's odd. It shouldn't need that tag. Will go ahead and remove.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-16 14:24:01+00:00): Hello onecamaleng. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532313874
there is something wrong with the tagging: i don't think it's a `biuilding=residential` (misspelled!), right? Then `Dra` isn't a valid value for `layer`, right? And is `Drainase` really the name, or do you searched for an `waterway=drain`?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain
user_5359 (2017-10-13 18:16:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
pyram (2017-10-18 20:27:38+00:00): ¡Hola! Rodarte!,

maybe this import (?) had crashed. See the untagged way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532320777 and many others nearby

It would be nice to see a source-tag at the changeset ;-)

Thanks for contributing,
pyram
user_5359 (2017-10-13 18:21:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag area=yes without any more information is useless (way 532323276).
Jethro10 (2017-10-13 16:55:21+00:00): Called kiosko not kiosho
mavl (2017-10-13 18:24:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45647969, 45648234, 45648308, 45648702, 45649112, 45649228, 45649284, 45649820, 45650124, 45650331, 45650840, 45651908, 45652095, 45652327, 45652817, 45653126, 45653327, 45653541, 45653955, 45674935, 45675320, 45675418, 45675476, 45683528, 45683539, 45685265, 45685527, 45685643, 45685933, 45687441, 45707418, 45707509, 45707552, 45707665, 45707697.
nebulon42 (2017-10-24 18:41:21+00:00): I will have to revert your name change (and the one of the user who edited the peak before). The user before removed Palec from "name" and left only Selenitza, which was bad. You changed Selenitza to Palec, which was not good either. If features on borders are known in different languages please try to adhere to the scheme name=both languages and name:sl/name:de for the individual languages. Thanks!
user_3022894 (2021-07-22 20:19:49+00:00): Hi albigdd,

erst mal sorry, dass ich dich hier nach so langer Zeit zu diesem Änderungsantrag kontaktiere, aber weißt du eventuell zufällig noch, weshalb du an dem Node der Hutgasse 14 den Eintrag für das Weingut Müller entfernt hattest? Laut der Webseite soll das Weingut wohl noch existieren, wohl an der Ecke Moselstraße/Hutgasse (?)

Viele Grüße
Lukas
albigdd (2021-07-22 20:41:30+00:00): Hallo Lukas,

ich hab das noch sehr dunkel vor Augen, dass da nichts mehr war. Auf Google gibt es ein Bild, was aussieht, dass das maximal zugewachsen ist.

https://www.google.de/maps/@50.0220267,7.1164608,3a,75y,185.88h,88.64t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipNa7RC_66Txq1iVzIMGIYVxfU9ZTSCw_y09nPGl!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipNa7RC_66Txq1iVzIMGIYVxfU9ZTSCw_y09nPGl%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya103.46158-ro-0-fo100!7i5660!8i2830

Welche Webseite meinst Du?

Auf dieser ist die Adresse zwar im Impressum Hutgasse 14, aber als Kontakt steht Moselstraße 47.

https://weingutmuellerreil.jimdofree.com/kontakt/

Ich kann's jedenfalls nicht überprüfen....

Viele Grüße

Alexander
user_3022894 (2021-07-25 15:33:06+00:00): Ah okay, ich verstehe. 
Vielen Dank für deine Antwort. Ja genau, die Webseite meinte ich. Ist aber ja in der Tat irgendwie eigenartig. Okay, dann belassen wir es einfach dabei würde ich sagen.

Viele Grüße,
Lukas
yaugenka (2017-10-15 22:46:13+00:00): привет. не меняйте пожалуйста теги name с русского на белорусский. можете принять участие в обсуждение этой темы на форуме https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57084
SomeoneElse (2017-10-13 18:45:14+00:00): Thanks for this!
Best Regards,
Andy
freebeer (2017-10-13 22:29:57+00:00): Pity that these reverts don't seem to have lasted long.
(Kids these days.  Why, when I was young...)
(me wonders what the highest revision number is in OSM and if this is an attempt to top that)
mvexel (2017-10-13 17:40:45+00:00): Following the discussion on talk-us (ongoing) I decided to downgrade this road to `highway=primary` (it was trunk). 

The main argument is that this highway, while clearly major, has many abutters and related parking and driveways entrances. It also has a bike lane for some segments. Secondary argument is that it does not serves a major connecting function in the road network. Happy to discuss!
majid1359 (2017-10-13 18:05:35+00:00): دبیرستان مدرس خیلی وقته از  غازیان بندرانزلی  جمع شده است و تخلیه شده است در واقع الان یک ساختمان تخلیه شده است
muralito (2017-10-15 03:20:28+00:00): Ivan, ¿no hay mas estacionamientos que lo borrastes?
joost schouppe (2017-10-20 09:10:55+00:00): Ik heb het nagekeken in CRAB en aangepast. Het oostelijk deel is volgens CRAB Sollenbeemd, enkel het westelijk deel is inderdaad Possozplein. Of denk je dat CRAB hier fout is?
mbethke (2017-10-15 13:05:07+00:00): ກະລຸນາ ￼ບໍ່ ໃສ່ ບ້ານ ດັ່ງ ຮ້ານກາເຟ. ບໍ່ ແມ່ນ ເຖືອກ.
Pink Duck (2017-10-14 11:34:19+00:00): Why use "St " abbreviation in churches when "St " has for years been unaccepted for road name abbreviations?
Richard (2017-10-16 10:38:40+00:00): 'St' is standard British orthography to denote a saint, rather than simply an abbreviation. Please see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/19609/saint-or-st-is-there-an-official-osm-policy
SK53 (2017-10-16 10:41:04+00:00): Because it hasn't, please read: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/19609/saint-or-st-is-there-an-official-osm-policy and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Invalid_Abbreviation_Expansion.

I would also suggest being a little lighter in the tone of your comments: it might be offputting to newcomers.
Pink Duck (2017-10-16 12:29:10+00:00): I have reviewed 1,034 churches in Norfolk and the Church of England website and I would say around 60% of them use the written word Saint when self-describing. The signage is shortened I believe through brevity, a contraction, not an abbreviation, and for search systems it is far easier to reduce than to expand to assist in search matches. A user could search for "St Something", "St. Something" or "Saint Something" and all should resolve.
Pink Duck (2017-10-16 12:35:52+00:00): In this particular case, I accept the contracted form is acceptable as I can find no official alternate form. The short_name tag will help search agents still match with a full form query.
km2bp (2017-10-14 19:37:24+00:00): Brak węzłów , chodniki niepołączone z drogami.
Supaplex (2018-01-20 13:15:35+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mueschel (2017-10-16 10:45:10+00:00): Hi,
could you check the surface tag here?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217793776

Cheers, Jan
user_4493657 (2017-10-16 11:39:15+00:00): Thanks! My mistake, I corrected it. Regards.
eggie (2017-11-14 11:01:43+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
trigpoint (2017-10-14 09:31:55+00:00): Hi Joshua
Thank you for this edit, I've been thinking I need to wander around it with a GPS.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175478082 is a service road, it would be good if you could split it where it connects to Yew Tree Meadow and extend Yew Tree Meadow to join Queensway.
Cheers Phil
jaap de vries (2017-10-16 09:10:41+00:00): Zo te zien ben je weer begonnen, let je even op welke highway tag je aanlegt? Nu lijken er 3 hier te lopen terwijl dit 1 weg en 2 vrijliggende fietspaden in aanbouw betreffen .
S_Emo (2017-10-16 10:16:31+00:00): Ja, inderdaad Jaap. Een advies om het zo te doen van Eggie. Die coacht me behoorlijk. :) Fijn zo'n ervaren Mapper. Vooral ook als het gaat om routes zoals van OV, fietsnetwerken etc. Leercurve is nu even best stijl :) 
De highway=proposed (voor de fietspaden) wordt straks highway=bicyle. 
Ik ben nu vooral even bezig geweest met de landuse alvast te splitsen etc. Straks (oa) aan de hand van trackingdata en/of luchtfoto ook nog precieser uitlijnen natuurlijk.
alesarrett (2017-10-25 05:49:48+00:00): Ciao TrueTarta, solamente un consiglio per rendere più chiari i tuoi editing. Il commento che hai inserito in questo changeset riguarda solamente l'editing del campo di rugby a S. Lazzaro, ma contiene molti altri editing diversi e questo confonde un po' chi cerca di capire quanto fatto. A volte è meglio spezzare il processo di editing in changsets separati e commentarli così in modo più appropriato. m2c.
TrueTarta (2017-10-25 09:15:55+00:00): Vi chiedo scusa. Hai perfettamente ragione, ma complice il pc forse lento, a volte la selezione risultava errata... ho capito devo editare e poi salvare.
A tratti. Grazie
CupIvan (2017-11-01 10:28:18+00:00): добрый день! 
вы поставили у дороги тип track, тем самым некоторые unclussified дороги выпали из связного дорожного графа 
http://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-NIZ/routing-map 
проверьте пожалуйста и либо повысьте нужный участок до unclussified, либо понизьте примыкающие дороги: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120207544#map=17/56.76938/43.35757
если необходимо указать качество покрытия, можно использовать уточняющие теги smoothness
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoothness или maxspeed:practical https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxspeed:practical
jaap de vries (2017-10-16 09:18:59+00:00): Kwam hier geen brug over de St Anthonisloop? 
Verder heb je wel heel veel bronnen source gebruikt. Welke arc gis versie gebruik je o.a.?
S_Emo (2017-10-16 10:19:12+00:00): Ik weet (nog) niet of er een duiker of brug komt. Dat kan ik nog niet zien. Ik wil/moet ook nog dat soort info toevoegen (maar nog in leerfase). Dit is wel een relatief veilig oefengebied als beginnend Mapper. Kun je me in een prive bericht iets meer vertellen - toelichten - over je vraag ivm arc gis versie?
jaap de vries (2017-10-16 10:22:44+00:00): Je gebruikt 7 bronnen waar onder Ersi , dat kan je alleen gebruiken met Arc Gis. Gebruik je versie 10.5?
Tomas Straupis (2017-10-14 07:09:18+00:00): Kas čia yra? Tikrai matau, kad sueprmarket čia negali būti, bet gali būti convenience, jei tai nedidelė parduotuvėlė, parduodanti įvairias prekes: nuo maisto iki šampūno.
Parduotuvės oficialus pavadinimas „Kromelis“? Gal galima kokią nuorodą į info internete?
wambacher (2017-10-14 09:16:16+00:00): Hi,

you killed the admin boundary of Thailand and this region too.

Please never ever modify relations, which you don't know about. 

regards
walter

see: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52919301
RVR009 (2017-10-17 16:57:36+00:00): Hi wambacher,
Thank you for your changeset comment. I sincerely did not intend to remove all the members from these relations. Thank you for finding and fixing this. I will be much more careful to when working with relations, we have found the source of the issue and taken measures to ensure it doesn't happen again. Thank you again for catching that and fixing it. Best, Sam
wambacher (2017-10-17 23:11:30+00:00): Great. One of the "toublemakers" is iD. iD is not secure when changing relations. best choice would be josm.
Best, walter
RVR009 (2017-10-19 16:53:48+00:00): I totally agree. Thanks Walter.
BCNorwich (2017-10-23 07:26:11+00:00): Hi, I noticed that this road section you added to the database :- "Way: Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (532376490)" is a duplication of the existing way.
Dkeith (2017-10-23 12:51:11+00:00): apologies. still learning.
Thinks the road is on a slight different path.
road is still covered in cones.
If you could fix i would be obliged
BCNorwich (2017-10-23 16:56:32+00:00): No problem, the duplicate section is now removed.
I'm still learning after several years mapping, OSM is continuously evolving so there's always something new. If I can help at all please just ask. Regards Bernard
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 00:01:07+00:00): Hi, I know you didn't add the name, but name=C5K doesn't look like a real name. Should this be loc_name="C5K Banchory-Devenick Road" instead?

Cheers,
Mike
BCNorwich (2017-10-29 07:45:43+00:00): Hi Mike Baggaley,
You are correct, it wasn't me and yes it seems wrong.
I looked up Aberdeenshire list of streets ( http://publications.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/dataset/c993f625-37ad-438a-bd28-5afe7ca6a5bc/resource/58d8fd38-2b20-45dd-9f1b-71ce210bba3a/download/south-highways-list.pdf )
which indicates C5K as being the Lochton - Auchlunies - Nigg Road, an east west road of many sections.
So I've removed the C5K names from the north south roads.
There were references to the C5K on numerous road building plans so I expect someone got things mixed up.
Regards Bernard
lesianalepa (2017-10-13 19:23:38+00:00): #msftidentity
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-16 14:25:54+00:00): Hello lukie80. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5166162024
you have tagged `capa6=forestry`. Should it be `capacity=6` instead? But then, what is `forestry` for?
lukie80 (2017-10-16 14:54:08+00:00): Thank you for finding the error I've made accidentally. It should be just capacity=6. Explanation: I blindly typed (JOSM): "cap" -> [TAB] -> "6" -> [Enter], but I actually didn't hit [TAB] and "forestry" remained from a previous tag.
lukie80 (2017-10-16 14:54:41+00:00): Fixed it.
S_Emo (2017-10-13 22:14:28+00:00): volgens mij heb ik het opgelost, maar weet het niet zeker
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-10-14 19:50:19+00:00): Porque as ruas estão abreviadas, voce esta copiando de onde?