piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nuclear007 (2018-01-10 22:18:37+00:00): Gaat wel lukken!
rurseekatze (2018-01-11 09:09:24+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55332373
literan (2018-01-11 10:02:52+00:00): Здравствуйте! корректные теги для дворовых проездов в жилых районах - это highway=service+living_street=yes. Тег service=driveway предназначен для мелких дорожек самой минимальной значимости (в первую очередь подъездных дорожек к отдельным частным домам).
eggie (2018-01-10 20:19:45+00:00): Onder het mom van test heb je een park gelegd over de bebouwing. Waarom?
eggie (2018-01-10 20:24:42+00:00): reverted due to PokemonGo-vandalisme
eggie (2018-01-10 20:24:56+00:00): Waarschuwing per pb gestuurd
eggie (2018-01-10 23:46:49+00:00): reverted by changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55334414
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 12:18:49+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55332443
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 12:18:41+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55332452
rurseekatze (2018-01-11 11:46:20+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55332459
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 12:18:34+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55332500
eggie (2018-01-10 20:24:33+00:00): reverted due to PokemonGo-vandalisme
eggie (2018-01-10 23:48:20+00:00): reverted by  Wijzigingenset #55333460
mavl (2018-12-24 23:39:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-10 20:21:21+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

Je edits zullen worden teruggedraaid.
Hier wordt serieus gewerkt aan een kaart en je edits worden als vandalisme beschouwd.
eggie (2018-01-10 20:24:25+00:00): reverted due to PokemonGo-vandalisme
eggie (2018-01-10 23:47:48+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #55333444
rurseekatze (2018-01-11 09:36:21+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55332584
TrickyFoxy (2022-04-30 22:33:17+00:00): 👋
> Не удалять! Поворотная точка.
Поворотная точка?🤨

Если не против перенесу из description в note
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/55332666
fjavier_gr (2022-03-06 13:17:28+00:00): Hola,
¿Se puede cambiar a en construcción el trazado de la variante de Zafra según esta noticia?
https://www.eldiario.es/extremadura/economia/gobierno-adjudica-variante-zafra-n-432-ocho-kilometros_1_8706626.html
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 20:25:05+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 20:30:42+00:00): Hallo Budsiebuds,

Je hebt hier een leisure=park aangelegd. Een park is een uitgestrekt gebied met paden, bomen, gras en een eventuele vijver wat als een deken over de landuse heen ligt. Parken hebben vaak ook een naam.  Een voorbeeld van een park vind je hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6314805

Dit stukje gras zou je moeten taggen als landuse=grass. Eventuele losse bomen kun je mappen als natural=tree.

Zou je dit aan willen passen? 

Graag reactie.

Vriendelijke groet,
Mark
BudsieBuds (2018-01-11 14:57:42+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast. Bedankt voor de informatie!
user_5359 (2018-01-12 20:08:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You move a node more than 100 meter. This node is an address node, and I can't find the street name near by.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3597470854/history

Please check the psoition of the node. If you need help for the correction: You are welcome.
roptat (2018-01-11 08:32:31+00:00): Salut,

je t'embêtes encore : les points sans tag de type ne sont pas rendus. Ce que tu as fait est bien (tu as ajouté de la donnée) mais pas suffisant pour être exploitable. Tu peux jeter un œil à https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Howto_Map_A pour avoir une idée des différents tags existants. D'après le nom et la description, j'aurais ajouté le tag "leisure=fitness_centre" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre). Qu'est-ce que tu en penses ?
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 02:37:09+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55333213
Paul_012 (2020-03-27 21:19:58+00:00): I've reverted the nudge of the border near the Ta Muean Thom temple, since it's internationally disputed and probably shouldn't be changed without consensus.
user_5359 (2018-01-12 20:11:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the booth value, please? If there isn't an address there (or you don't know this), please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 20:48:51+00:00): Hallo Budsiebuds,

Je hebt de Rabobank pinautomaat verplaatst en aangepast maar hij zit nu vastgeplakt aan het gebouw. Die moet je even loshalen.

Verder zijn er nu drie nodes met adres Wolfsberg 1.
Telecommunicatie (de node die jij hebt toegevoegd).
Rabobank.
De BAG address node.

De grote vraag hier is nu. Wat zit er nu echt op nummer 1?

Datgene wat er echt zit moet worden samengevoegd met de BAG address node.

Is de Rabobank alleen een pinautomaat? Zo ja kun je denk ik het beste de adresinformatie vanaf gooien.

Groeten,
Mark
BudsieBuds (2018-01-11 15:18:57+00:00): Bedankt voor de nuttige informatie, hier kan ik wat mee. Ik heb de aangekaarte problemen opgelost!
user_5359 (2018-02-03 04:33:18+00:00): Hello! Short question to retail (or better commercial)  area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552205683 : Are the parking slot not also part of the business and also the fitness center behind the parking?
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 21:47:23+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 21:51:44+00:00): Hello Issa,

Do you speak dutch?

Not sure why you have deleted these houses.

Accordig to the Kadaster these houses are under construction. For this reason they were imported into OSM. See https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=173143.9&geometry.y=448958.38356292&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0228100000081531&detailsObjectId=0228010000061276

Please state your reasons for deleting these houses.

Best regards,
Mark
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 22:46:56+00:00): Hello Issa,

I have reverted this changeset under changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55336860

These buildings are under construction. It may very well be that in 2012 houses were demolished here but these houses are not the demolished houses.

Hope this makes sense.

Best regards,
Mark
Negreheb (2020-07-06 06:33:12+00:00): Warum steht hier das suburb in der Straße dabei, das stimmt ja gar nicht.  	"addr:street=Wildschönauerstraße, Niederau" ist ja vollkommen falsch. Ich meine wo gelesen zu haben, dass du das für den Renderer bzw. Nominatim gemacht hast - das sollte meiner Meinung nach wieder weg. Und zwar überall.

Lg Negreheb
user_7581226 (2020-07-06 11:56:54+00:00): Aus heutiger Sicht, war das damals Mappen so, damit Nominatim funktioniert.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=793486#p793486
Ich sehe die Adresszukunft von OSM heute eher bei einer künftigen Plugin Lösung.
Negreheb (2020-07-06 16:00:11+00:00): Es ist falsch. Du hast damit "Mapping für den Renderer" fabriziert und sonst nichts. Wenn ich nach "Wildschönaustraße 314" suche, finde ich gar nichts, also "funktioniert" es auch nicht. Es wäre gut, wenn du die Adressen richtig stellen würdest :)
user_7581226 (2020-07-06 16:18:00+00:00): Es gibt keine Wildschönaustraße, was soll der Unsinn. Ref: https://www.tirol.gv.at/statistik-budget/tiris/adressen-suchen/adressen/liste/adressenaktion/suche/
Negreheb (2020-07-07 07:08:41+00:00): Ich hab mich vertippt, im Ausgangskommentar stehts korrekt.

"Wildschönauerstraße 319" ist nicht zu finden.
user_7581226 (2020-07-07 12:28:14+00:00): Hallo Negreheb, vielleicht kümmerst Du dich vorerst mal um jene von Dir per Revert gelöschten Adressen in der Stadt Salzburg.
Ich habe die Wildschönau schon im Auge, und sobald sich eine bessere Lösung anbietet werde ich dies dort umgehend umsetzen. Aktuell sind unsere OSM Adressen mit der Landes Adress Suche Tiris kompatibel. Ich möchte nicht für einen fehlgegangenen Blaulicht Einsatz verantwortlich zeichnen. Aktuell findet Tiris das in OSM angewandte Adressformat. Grüße
Negreheb (2020-07-07 12:45:05+00:00): Hier geht es um diese falsch eingetragenen Adressen in diesem Changeset. Ich würde dich bitten diese richtig zu stellen. Die Adressen in OSM müssen nicht über Tiris verfügbar sein, da das nichts miteinander zu tun hat.
user_7581226 (2020-07-07 14:02:09+00:00): Für pausiere diese Diskussion mit dem Verweis auf mögliche Blaulichtrsiken bei unbedachtem Handeln. Sofern eine nachvollziehbar funktionierende Lösung vorliegt, erkläre ich mich gerne dazu bereit dieses in der Gemeinde Wildschönau und seinen Ortschaften anzuwenden.
user_7581226 (2020-07-07 14:03:13+00:00): Ich pausiere diese Diskussion mit dem Verweis auf mögliche Blaulichtrisiken bei unbedachtem Handeln. Sofern eine nachvollziehbar funktionierende Lösung vorliegt, erkläre ich mich gerne dazu bereit dieses in der Gemeinde Wildschönau und seinen Ortschaften anzuwenden.
Negreheb (2020-07-09 10:51:49+00:00): Zusammenfassung: Du bist nicht bereit, die falschen Tags richtig zu stellen?
user_7581226 (2020-07-09 12:01:15+00:00): Ich habe meine Beweggründe denke ich verantwortungsvoll und eindeutig genug dargelegt.
Negreheb (2020-09-18 08:00:20+00:00): Kleine Ergänzung als Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132608336

Da sich hier nichts geändert hat, nehme ich an, dass du nicht bereit bist, diesen offensichtlichen Fehler auszubessern?
spjaquish (2018-01-11 00:10:17+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55333592
zors1843 (2018-01-11 09:12:24+00:00): Reverted - remove parks - restore landuse
user_5359 (2018-01-12 20:02:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag area=yes without any more information is useless. What do you want to achieve with your entry? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552207106
roptat (2018-01-11 08:38:02+00:00): J'ai l'impression que tu as fait une petite bêtise avec le nœud hôpital : il est vraiment là ? Si oui, il faudrait le détacher de la route pour le mettre du bon côté, et pas en plein milieu.
Minotaure (2018-01-12 15:27:04+00:00): Je ne comprends pas. Peut-être que oui mais j'en doute.
La seule installation hospitalière que j'ai ajoutée est celle de l'armée française qui remplace l'hôpital Bouffard....
Minotaure (2018-01-12 15:33:59+00:00): ERRATUM
J'ai ajouté celui de Tadjourah mais il ne me semble pas être sur une quelconque route...
roptat (2018-01-12 16:06:06+00:00): En dessous des commentaires tu peux voir les objets modifiés dans ce changeset. L'un d'entre eux est un hôpital qui se retrouve au milieu d'une route. C'est surement une erreur, donc je l'ai replacé là où il était avant.
avm (2018-01-11 15:33:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55355403 where the changeset comment is: Revert non existing park - A pesdesting area (plaza) is not a park
user_5359 (2018-01-12 19:59:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
M!dgardAutomated (2018-01-10 20:37:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 54706615.
spjaquish (2018-01-10 23:52:50+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55333882
iandees (2018-01-12 20:37:40+00:00): Reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55391466. Please only add verifiable objects to the map. Lots of people rely on this map for navigation and search and more. Adding fake buildings and objects means its harder to use the map.
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 22:05:24+00:00): Hello Issa,

I'll continue in English as long as I am not sure whether you speak Dutch :).

The edit area is quite big. Could you try to contain your edits in a smaller area? Make some changes in one street and save. Then continue to the next area and save again. Makes it much easier to review changes.

So you have deleted some buildings near the station area. Not all of these buildings are gone according to the Kadaster. See https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=174285.04&geometry.y=448825.66356292&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0228100000061601&detailsObjectId=0228100000061601

See below what the mosque looks like on the Kadaster website. Does it have the right shape there? If so all that is required is a BAG update (can be requested on the Dutch forum). Usually there is no need to change the geometry of a building yourself as the Kadaster data is accurate.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=173446.72&geometry.y=449081.02356292&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0228100000078834&detailsObjectId=0228010000057954

Please respond.

Thanks and regards,
Mark
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 22:41:45+00:00): Hello Issa,

I have reverted your changeset in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55336726

I think it would be best to reconsider these changes. Some of them seem correct while others do not seem correct. It would be best to make these changes (like the landuse=grass and the playgrounds) again in separate changesets so they can be evaluated one by one.

Thanks,
Mark
iandees (2018-01-12 20:37:30+00:00): Reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55391466. Please only add verifiable objects to the map. Lots of people rely on this map for navigation and search and more. Adding fake buildings and objects means its harder to use the map.
spjaquish (2018-01-10 23:52:17+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55334002
iandees (2018-01-12 20:37:26+00:00): Reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55391466. Please only add verifiable objects to the map. Lots of people rely on this map for navigation and search and more. Adding fake buildings and objects means its harder to use the map.
spjaquish (2018-01-11 00:09:24+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55334147
roptat (2018-01-11 08:41:54+00:00): Salut,

il ne faut surtout pas utiliser google maps, ou quoi que ce soit de google : c'est illégal. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:FAQ#Pourquoi_n.27utilisez_vous_pas_Google_Maps_ou_untel_pour_vos_donn.C3.A9es_.3F)
Minotaure (2018-01-12 15:30:17+00:00): Désolé.
Mais je me suis flagellé dix fois.....
user_5359 (2018-01-12 19:47:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I can't see this way on three different aerial images? In all cases has the way the same structure like building on the aerial images.
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 21:26:53+00:00): Ha die Stan,

We zijn er bijna.
De tag sport=cycling;bycicle klopt denk ik niet. Denk dat je bycicle  eraf moet halen want ik zie hem zo snel niet staan bij de bekende sport tags (als hij al zou bestaan zou het bicycle moeten zijn). sport=cycling is voldoende.

Verder heb je nog sport=Sportclimbing. Dit moet sport=climbing zijn.

Die natural=wood heb je nu verwijderd maar had je ook mogen aanpassen naar landuse=forest. 

Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55334246

Alle begin is moeilijk maar als je wat vaker mapt zul je er snel meer handigheid in krijgen :).

Succes met aanpassen!

Groeten,
Mark
Martin Borsje (2018-01-11 06:43:13+00:00): Kan iemand ook nagaan en zonodig wijzigen of iedere individuele waterplas de naam IJzeren Man krijgt, of is het - denk ik - het gebied?
Captain_Spork (2018-01-11 08:14:05+00:00): Volgens wikipedia is Ijzeren man de benaming van baggermachines die zijn gebruikt bij het uitgraven van plassen en meren t.b.v. de zandwinning. Gevolg daarvan is dat er veel plassen in Nederland die naam dragen. Zie https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/IJzeren_Man

Of het park gebied dan ook zo heet durf ik niet te zeggen. Ik ben niet bekend in Geldrop :). Misschien dat Stan daar een uitspraak over kan doen.
eggie (2018-01-11 08:30:02+00:00): Wat in ieder geval niet goed is..is het feit dat er twee parken over elkaar heen liggen. Eén genaam IJzereman en één IJzeren man. Wie haalt die duplicate met foute naam weg?
eggie (2018-01-11 08:30:27+00:00): grrr.. genaamd..
eggie (2018-01-11 08:36:29+00:00): Duplicate verwijderd en overgebleven park veranderd in De IJzeren Man
Captain_Spork (2018-01-11 12:45:32+00:00): Ha eggie,

Goed dat je nog even meegekeken hebt. Ik had het niet goed gezien in archavi. Dacht dat Stan alleen de naam had aangepast maar kennelijk had hij dus een hele nieuwe leisure=park polygon getekend.

Bedankt in ieder geval!

Groeten,
Mark
stanleur (2018-01-11 15:28:59+00:00): Net nog even gecontroleerd inderdaad IJzeren Man. excuus voor de duplicatie had de oude niet meer gezien dacht dat deze weg was ivm. voorgaande fout.

Groeten, Stan
iandees (2018-01-12 20:37:21+00:00): Reverted this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55391466. Please only add verifiable objects to the map. Lots of people rely on this map for navigation and search and more. Adding fake buildings and objects means its harder to use the map.
user_5359 (2018-01-12 19:46:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I can't see this park on three different aerial images? Did yo have an source for this park?
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 22:22:04+00:00): Hello Issa,

This is not the correct way to map a leisure=park. A leisure=park polygon is like a blanket that is placed over landuse, trees and paths. In this case the landuse was not specified and none of the tree's were mapped.

I have now done this for you in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55336217

Next time you map a park please make sure to add landuse=grass/forest, add natural=tree or natural=tree_row, add natural is water in case there is water, add the paths, etc. After that you can cover the park area with a new polygon leisure=park.

Hope this makes sense :). If you have any questions please do not hesitate to ask.

Best regards,
Mark
spjaquish (2018-01-11 00:01:22+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55334499
apm-wa (2018-03-20 18:14:17+00:00): Please stop vandalizing the map of Ashgabat or I will report you to the OSM Data Working Group and ask that you be blocked.
BCNorwich (2018-01-12 18:40:30+00:00): Hi, I removed the relations you added because they just didn't make sense. I've joined the paths to the roads. also amended and retagged the areas.
Regards Bernard
Gh0stz0x (2018-01-11 06:28:13+00:00): Ciao o benvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Non riesci a commentare meglio quello che fai al posto di mettere. ...?
Grazie e buon mapping!
iandees (2018-01-10 23:13:00+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55334627
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 02:37:44+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55334716
spjaquish (2018-01-10 23:56:47+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55334824
nathan206 (2018-05-31 17:43:33+00:00): Test comment 1
spjaquish (2018-01-10 23:54:50+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55334926
viloan (2018-01-10 21:23:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 21:37:35+00:00): Toppie!