piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:29:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Commodoortje (2016-08-18 17:26:03+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
De door u aangebrachte 
leisure=playground
lijkt niet op de juiste positie te zijn neergezet, 
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
aceman444 (2016-09-25 14:44:39+00:00): Hi, "Blue church" in Bratislava is a church, not a monument. And it is already mapped. This name is in "loc_name" (also without typos).
☆Finvenkulo (2016-09-29 15:26:19+00:00): Można usunąć ten punkt, dodałem 'Martwy las' miesiąc wcześniej jako obszar.
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:54:45+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_3022894 (2019-01-20 11:47:56+00:00): Hi Kiekin,
wurde dieser Bahnübergang: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24843314 mit dieser Straße nicht mittlerweile zu einem reinen Fußweg-Übergang heruntergestuft? Zu sehen unter anderem auf Mapillary.
Viele Grüße,
Lukas
Seehundeführer (2016-08-28 11:48:33+00:00): Ist der Start einer Wanderfahrt wirklich ein Punkt der von allgemeiner Interesse, dass er in der Karte aufgenommen werden sollte?

Als Park?

Nutz doch lieber die Markermap (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Markermap) um deinen Teilnehmern den Punkt mitzuteilen.
Nakaner (2016-08-28 14:47:16+00:00): Ich haben diesen Änderungssatz sowie die anderen drei Ruder-Änderungssätze durch Änderungssatz 41757270 zurückgesetzt.

OSM ist ein öffentliche Datenbank für vor Ort erhebbare Daten. Das wurde dir nach dem Anlegen deines Benutzerkontos auch so mitgeteilt. Falls du das vergessen hast – hier noch einmal die Seite, die du damals hoffentlich gelesen hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome
Protoxenus (2017-10-13 08:57:05+00:00): Hallo, 
du hast hier eine Vollsperrung der B110 eingegeben. Kannst du eine Aussage darüber treffen, ob diese schon wieder aufgehoben ist?

Gruß Protoxenus
Patze (2017-10-13 14:05:54+00:00): Hallo Protoxenus, 
ja, die Straßensperrung ist bereits wieder aufgehoben. 
Gruß, Patze
Protoxenus (2017-10-13 15:00:26+00:00): OK, hab es geändert.
Gruß Protoxenus
fkv (2018-08-24 03:40:33+00:00): Wofür ist diese Relation notwendig? Es gibt schon eine Relation für die Wegmarkierung (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6438249), und die Schwierigkeiten (via_ferrata_scale usw.) sind auf den einzelnen Abschnitten getaggt. Nebenbei ist der Name falsch, die Wildfährte heißt nur Wildfährte.
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:55:10+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-08-18 11:46:16+00:00): 電信門市會用office=telecommunication
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:29:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Robowolfer (2016-08-18 18:23:05+00:00): whats means "source;maxspeed=survey" ?
SK53 (2016-08-19 09:20:43+00:00): It should, of course, be source:maxspeed=survey. It means that I have driven this road & noted changes in speed limit (rather than used other sources).
MKnight (2016-08-19 09:05:59+00:00): Wie muss man die Änderungen hier verstehen? Neu eingetragen und wieder gelöscht?

Zumindest auf Bing-Sat kann man an der Stelle ein Gebäude erkennen.
Nakaner (2016-08-28 14:45:31+00:00): zurückgesetzt durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41757270

Begründung siehe https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/41530250
Zverik (2016-11-02 21:04:55+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы нехорошо поступили. Я откатил ваши правки. Мы будем рады, если вы внесёте настоящие заведения в вашем городе.
user_5359 (2016-08-20 17:41:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.

If you need help: You are welcome!
aharvey (2017-02-26 09:18:32+00:00): Really?
TheSwavu (2017-02-26 21:56:46+00:00): Must've been the least interesting visit to Sydney if this was the highlight.

Has this moved recently? I always remember it being in a building you could enter from Hickson Road.
aharvey (2017-02-27 00:02:33+00:00): I'm not sure of the exact location, I might have misplaced it when I originally added it.
schleuss (2016-08-18 16:57:19+00:00): Thanks for adding this!
Commodoortje (2016-08-18 17:23:24+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
De door u aangebrachte 
shop=electronics
name=Helmond
lijkt niet op de juiste positie te zijn neergezet, weet je het adres van de shop?
Weet je toevallig ook het internetadres?
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Alecs01 (2016-08-18 13:23:58+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, are there really two danish consulates in Milan? this one is not listed here: http://italien.um.dk/it/servizi-consolari/consolati/
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:29:31+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Mike Baggaley (2016-08-21 09:11:10+00:00): Hi, is 105 really the name of the peak at node 4355538354, or did you intend this to be an elevation?

Cheers,
Mike
Hbunnet (2016-08-21 09:45:31+00:00): Thanks, corrected now.
literan (2017-08-14 20:00:35+00:00): добрый день. Вам тут вопрос задают: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1101581#map=19/55.31891/38.65016&layers=N
eisa01 (2023-01-03 12:05:27+00:00): This is now called Moone Le Villa when I walked by?
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:29:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
captain_slow (2016-08-22 12:55:56+00:00): why did you remove the name kühgasse. is it not valid anymore?
geevee (2016-08-22 13:57:44+00:00): Thanks for watching!
I couldn't find any signs that this path is called "Kühgasse" on the ground (so this name doesn't help orienteering). Northern part looks like an internal service road, and Southern part is a rarely used path. Also, I tried to find this name on the internet and couldn't find anything.

After your question I tried to dig deeper. Here are my findings:
1. Official Zürich map shows marks service road as Kühgasse (footpath is not mapped), see https://www.maps.stadt-zuerich.ch/zueriplan3/Stadtplan.aspx?#route_visible=true&basemap=Stadtplan&map=&scale=2000&xkoord=2682335.0226785466&ykoord=1246695.065212398&lang=&layer=&window=&selectedObject=&selectedLayer=&toggleScreen=&legacyUrlState=&drawings=
2. alt-zueri.ch has a nice page that says that part of Butzenstrasse (between Frohalpstrasse and Albisstrasse) was called Kühgasse before 1893. See http://www.alt-zueri.ch/turicum/strassen/b/butzenstrasse/butzenstrasse.html
3. Another fact from alt-zueri.ch: there is a Kühgasse, which starts from Kühweidweg and ends at Butzenstrasse. The name was given in 1997. See http://www.alt-zueri.ch/turicum/strassen/k/kuehgasse/kuehgasse.html

I think #3 is a good argument to check to re-survey. Maybe there is a sign where the path starts from Hinterhagenweg. If there are no signs there, I think it makes sense to leave the path unnamed, since there is no clear information where it starts, where it ends, and it doesn't help navigation. What do you think?
captain_slow (2016-08-22 20:38:30+00:00): your opinion sounds reasonable so it may stay unnamed untill further surveying. your find of the alt-zueri.ch entry is quite interesting :-)
i just thought it is still named kühgasse because in the id editor on the background layer "Stadplan Zürich" and "Übersichtsplan Zürich" (i hope they are named the same in the english version) it is labelled kühgasse.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:29:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
chnav (2016-08-18 14:29:49+00:00): откатил, будьте внимательнее тут серьёзный проект на пользу людям
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-11 21:58:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44332035 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining un-discussed and incompatible imported buildings in Perth
JJIglesias (2017-10-28 22:40:59+00:00): Saludos. Esta edicion de La Victoria y La Pampa se podria considerar como vandalismo del mapa de OSM. Por favor tener cuidado al realizar ediciones y NO daniar la data. Muchas Gracias JJ
grullab (2017-10-28 23:29:59+00:00): Hola, todas mis ediciones las hago de buena fe... aunque yo no sepa como ver cuales han sido mis ediciones. Puedes explicarme el problema por favor? Gracias!
JJIglesias (2017-10-30 15:39:43+00:00): Saludos, si bien por aqui no puedo enviarte una captura de pantalla, lo cierto es que casi todas las calles de "La Victoria"estaban arrastradas hacia nodos en flecha al oeste, haciendo un amasijo de varias vias con un nodo en comun; ya fue corregido para ponerlo en su estado correcto; solo pedimos que revises bien el resultado de la edicion antes de darle Guardar, y gracias por editar en #OSM_BO
grullab (2017-10-30 20:06:55+00:00): OK, entiendo. Hace cuanto tiempo este error fue corregido? Porque ya la edición incorrecta ya no es visible, tampoco en otro nivel de zoom... De todo modo Tarija no es un lugar donde paso frecuentemente, así que no noté el error despues, pero en realidad pensé que antes de guardar sí reviso mis cambios... Es un placer ocuparse con Bolivia :) saldudos
Nakaner (2016-08-28 14:45:23+00:00): zurückgesetzt durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41757270

Begründung siehe https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/41530250
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-12 14:54:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44347671 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining un-discussed and incompatible imported buildings in Perth
Tchiller (2016-09-23 13:23:13+00:00): track=* is no valid value. Please remove or add some fixme tag. 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437761740
and also the ways:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437772419
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437772418
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437772417
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437772416
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437772415
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437772414
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437761742
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437761741
ulrich_ (2016-09-24 09:46:14+00:00): Thank you for the note; all tags track=* on Falkland Islands removed.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:29:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:28:46+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse (2016-08-19 15:16:45+00:00): Ten sklep nie jest w połowie drogi - Szedłem za końcem drogi ostatniej nocy. Tak więc, czy mógłbyś wykorzystać elementy poprawnie, więc nie ktoś inny, nie musi to naprawić?
Felipe Alves (2016-08-22 22:05:06+00:00): Jakson, vi que colocou na descrição dessa edição o link pra foto, por acaso conhece o mapillary.com? Lá dá pra fazer upload das fotos no mapa, pode ser usado por qq um, tanto pra editar o OSM, como para outros fins.
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-22 22:20:47+00:00): Não conhecia, Felipe. Obrigado pela dica. Por coincidência, a primeira foto em que cliquei era sua. Só achei o site muito lento no computador que estou usando. Acho que ele demanda processador e internet rápidos.
Felipe Alves (2016-08-22 23:12:32+00:00): Mas o aplicativo é fácil de usar, é só iniciar a sessão de captura e deixar o celular preso no carro, bike, ou ir apontando a pé. As fotos tb podem ser visualizadas aqui no iD, editor do OpenStreetMap.
RafalR (2016-08-18 20:34:58+00:00): Ten budynek jest w rzeczywistości taki krzywy czy tylko tak krzywo narysowany?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-11 20:46:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44330754 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining un-discussed and incompatible imported buildings in Perth
Warin61 (2017-01-09 23:22:29+00:00): Hi,
Way: 437773357 crop=beet is USA English, crop=beetroot is UK English
PaulMorel (2016-08-21 17:10:17+00:00): I don't know if you noticed, but you created a duplicate Sentier des Voyageurs. There's already a more complete version of the path parallel to this one. I'd advise removing this one.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-12 03:39:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44336007 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining un-discussed and incompatible imported buildings in Perth
Grillo (2016-08-18 18:54:34+00:00): Har kaféet bytt namn? Du har bara lagt in ett alternativt namn för Café må gott.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-12 14:18:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44346450 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining un-discussed and incompatible imported buildings in Perth
GerdP (2017-09-16 06:35:11+00:00): Moin!
Warum hast Du z.B. hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403882576
aus Area=0 area=0 gemacht?
Aus meiner Sicht war das irgendein Import, bei dem Area etwas ganz anderes bedeutet als area (=yes/no)
wambacher (2017-09-16 11:30:25+00:00): weil ich das eventuell nicht erkannt habe?

nun, der Tag ist so oder so nicht wertvoll. Stammt aus einen - damals miserablen und auch wohl nicht angemeldeten - Shape-Import und das ganze ist über ein jahr her. kannst es ja zurückdrehen, ich sehe allerdings keinen Sinn darin
GerdP (2017-09-16 11:59:30+00:00): Neh, will ich auch nicht. Passiert anders wo auch immer wieder, weil halt JOSM meckert.
Irgendwo hast Du auch einfach alles entfernt, was nicht üblich ist. Könnte man hier evtl auch machen.
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:56:35+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 16:12:57+00:00): isso não é castelo
dgitto (2016-08-19 06:35:59+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM. Sei sicuro che questo edificio ha un unico numero civico?
dgitto (2016-08-19 06:40:29+00:00): Tra l'altro un edificio ne contiene un altro. che è un errore
Nakaner (2016-08-23 11:45:09+00:00): Bist du für Mentz tätig? Falls ja, dann platziere bitte einen entsprechenden Vermerk in deinem Benutzerprofil auf osm.org (wie deine Kollegen).
Tchiller (2016-09-23 13:20:48+00:00): * is no valid value in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437784191
ulrich_ (2016-09-24 10:04:29+00:00): changed to bridge=yes
Derick Rethans (2016-08-18 21:45:54+00:00): Could you please capitalize items correctly, so that somebody else doesn't have to fix it?
DGerveno (2016-09-05 16:12:59+00:00): Este tramo de río se sigue llamando y se llamará siempre "río Flumen". Otra cosa es que sea posible practicar descenso de barrancos en él, y que entonces a dicho tramo se le conozca como "barranco de las Palomeras del Flumen", pero sólo en dicho ámbito. Aún así, su nombre oficial sigue siendo "Río Flumen".
user_5359 (2016-08-20 17:35:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think you live in the middle of a street.
kayle (2016-08-19 05:22:02+00:00): Привет,
эти изменения являются частными пятна на посещения? Некоторые из них являются активными.
Меры предосторожности при редактировании в maps.me, изменения / данные загрузки перейти в реальную карту и не предназначена для добавления частных точек.
К сожалению, текст переведен с помощью Google Translate.
MiroJanosik (2016-08-19 08:39:45+00:00): Node 4355994889 looks to be incorrect; satelite maps show houses on the place and no Castle. There is already mapped castle 1km South

4355939092 "Helikon Castle Museum" is also out of place, and it should not be "castle" but a "museum" as the name says.

4355932394 is some yard, not sure why it should be attraction

there are more mistakes like that, whole changeset should be fixed.
kayle (2016-08-23 06:36:54+00:00): No answer, reverted - http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41630577
*Martin* (2016-08-19 16:03:58+00:00): Please stop adding garbage to the map!
GinaroZ (2016-08-18 17:27:06+00:00): There's also amenity=animal_shelter if you want to add it to the dog & cat home http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal
GinaroZ (2016-08-18 17:28:08+00:00): Oh bugger, I didn't see you had added another way for the whole area, ignore me! :X
mstriewe (2016-08-18 20:09:07+00:00): In einem deiner drei Changesets ist dir irgendwas mächtig verrutscht. Ich habe es in #41542979 versucht zu korrigieren. Schaue bitte mal, ob es jetzt so stimmt.
Achoin (2016-08-19 04:52:01+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы внесли исправления в карту openstreetmap с помощью приложения MAPS.ME.
1. Остановка Осипенко. Почему 8 в названии? Удалил.
2. Телемакс и Пятерочка. Если Телемакса не существует в этом месте, то необходимо поставить на нем отметку - "места не существует" и добавить рядом новую точку, именно в этом случае, так как типы магазинов не совпадают. Если типы совпадают, то можно обойтись просто сменой названия.
Исправил.
dgitto (2016-08-19 13:31:04+00:00): please explain your edits with a better description than "test", expecially in case of deletion like this and expecially in your first edit!
ratrun (2016-08-27 07:59:57+00:00): Could you please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437821818 ? According to bing images and existing data this new road is not plausible.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
skorasaurus (2016-08-18 16:45:08+00:00): see the following for more info - http://www.dot.state.oh.us/districts/D12/Deputy%20Director/News/Pages/Lakefront-West-Mainline-Closures--Restrictions-to-Begin-August-8-for-25-days.aspx
serock (2016-08-22 19:45:14+00:00): Gomerías:
shop=car_repair + service=tyres	Reparación únicamente (no venta).
shop=tyres + repair=yes	Ventas de neumáticos con servicio de reparación.
Toda esta info. esta en los links que le pase.
Saludos
serock (2016-08-22 19:46:28+00:00): Corregido.
Otnow (2016-08-19 07:22:34+00:00): Будьте внимательны, вы создали дубль существующего объекта - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3142484516
literan (2016-08-19 12:43:29+00:00): Почти все неправильно: детская площадка на дороге, неверное применение тегов, отсутствие кавычек, написание с маленькой буквы. Откатываю.
literan (2016-08-19 13:10:46+00:00): что, прямо в гаражах детский сад организовали? ужас, 27 дом гораздо южнее, где Монетка. https://2gis.ru/moscow/geo/4504235282977723?queryState=center%2F37.258702%2C55.84272%2Fzoom%2F18 Откатываю, как явный вандализм
Владимир К (2016-09-05 11:37:14+00:00): foot=yes и bicycle=yes не нужны на highway=footway
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-08-20 17:27:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you notice the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186576376 . Your node is a duplicate entry. Thats why I deleted it.
Jose Riha (2018-02-04 10:50:32+00:00): ahoj,

odkial mas prosim taketo tagovanie otvaracich hodin? j
naoliv (2016-10-04 20:57:36+00:00): Aguiar, você alterou de forma incorreta a classificação de Candiota.
Note que a classificação é baseada na população do local.
"village" não significa que o local é uma vila, mas sim que possui menos do que 10 mil habitantes.
Utilize essa tabela para futuras edições https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:place#Valores
Владимир К (2016-08-19 05:31:28+00:00): Формат телефона +7 499 1234567
flohoff (2016-08-19 08:00:00+00:00): Hi,
ich habe hier den Bollard mal ergänzt um foot=yes bicycle=yes - Sonst ist der so nach tagging stanard gar nicht passierbar.

Flo
HolgerJeromin (2016-08-19 14:22:44+00:00): Das sieht die englische und deutsche wiki Seite für bollard anders. Default ist dort access no, foot yes, bicycle yes
Aber schadet nicht das explizit zu setzen. Danke
user_5359 (2016-08-20 17:23:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.