piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gh0stz0x (2018-03-21 20:45:37+00:00): Io sono calmissimo... :-D
>Se ci sono degli errori sono in buona fede, >correggeteli
Non metto in dubbio che sono in buona fede, è per questo che chi ha più dimestichezza con OSM aiuta chi ne ha meno. Per quanto riguarda la parola "correggeteli"... No mi dispiace, posso far notare un errore ma che debba pure correre appresso pure al CAI Salò, no grazie...
>Quindi il parcheggio è funzione di una >strada o di una piazza o di un ambito. >Provate a riflettere con calma. 
Non devi convincere ne me ne demon_box ma gli altri 4888000 mappers. :-D
>In merito poi agli errori di ortografia >mappale siate più tolleranti, altrimenti >invece di far crescere la comunità OMS >rischia di avvizzire. 
Ma certo che si è tolleranti, è che se nessuno dice gli errori commessi e come rimediare, si rischia di avere una qualità dei dati <=0. Mi dispiace Corrado che l' hai presa male il mio scherzo "Fustigate il CAI Salò"... Un ultima cosa. Tutti i mapper svolgono un ruolo di pubblico servizio/interesse e lo fanno gratis... 
Un pacca sulla spalla Andreas
demon_box (2018-03-17 17:12:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570463633

hai dimenticato di mettere questo landuse come membro inner del landuse=forest
HolloWorld (2018-05-18 03:20:14+00:00): Please, do not name laundry shops "Self laundry shops", just like naming station by "Hoi Foo Street Station" Station, doesn't make sense, right ?
GOwin (2018-03-19 08:01:47+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

I've been wondering about your #CTVS hashtag in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57266408
eggie (2018-03-17 13:52:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-17 14:00:02+00:00): Je gebied van je edit is zo groot omdat je een waterplas hebt geplakt aan een administratieve grens. Probeer je in het begin te beperken om een beetje aan de editor te wennen. Water op landuse tekenen mag eigenlijk niet zomaar. Dat kent weer aparte regels. Ik kijk even of ik iets los kan maken.
eggie (2018-03-17 14:04:44+00:00): Het water ligt weer los en heb ik ik een zogenaamde multipolygoon gezet. 
Wanneer je doorzet met mappen kom je dit vanzelf tegen.
Onder het water zit immers geen gras. Het water is inner en het grass is de outer.
zors1843 (2018-03-17 13:56:44+00:00): Way Rue du Vingt Avril (570465846) partly duplicates way 520731182
demon_box (2018-03-17 17:19:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570469510

hai dimenticato di mettere questo landuse come membro inner del landuse=forest
jeka p (2021-10-04 19:34:03+00:00): und hier auch dasselbe?
Wegen solchen Aktionen geht viele Information verloren.
Hast Du in vielen Gebieten solche Aktionen durchgeführt?
jeka p (2021-10-04 19:25:57+00:00): wäre es nicht sinnvoller DE:rural auf maxspeed=100 und source:maxspeed=DE:rural zu ersetzen?
jetzt ist die Information einfach verloren gegangen
eggie (2018-03-17 13:53:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-17 14:22:33+00:00): Alle begin is natuurlijk moeilijk. Veel wegen zitten nu geplakt aan de landuse farmland en grass. Dat geeft later problemen zeker als deze elementen helemaal gaan samenlopen.
Genoeg te doen hier, en aarzel niet iets te vragen. Op het frum van OSM loopt een draadje over dit stuk weg. Een aantal (startende) mappers is er al aan bezig.
eggie (2018-03-17 14:23:35+00:00): forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61350
eggie (2018-03-17 14:26:41+00:00): Wat wegen losgemaakt van landuse hier
SapientGuy (2018-03-17 15:46:13+00:00): Wegen&landuse verbindingen zaten er al, idd lastig. Ik zal zeker het forum bezoeken zodat alle veranderingen ronde de nieuwe N18 iets gecoordineerder verwerkt kunnen worden
eggie (2018-03-17 16:16:02+00:00): Genoeg te doen hier... Op het forum kun je jezelf voorstellen in het draadje welkom. Je  bent er van harte welkom.
inlog identiek aan OSM account. 
Ook kun je bij opload het hokje aanvinken met de tekst: : “Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt”
GOwin (2018-03-19 08:01:36+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

I've been wondering about your #CTVS hashtag in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57267100
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:23:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
jeka p (2022-07-11 19:34:35+00:00): Warum gelöscht und nicht korregiert?
demon_box (2018-03-17 17:25:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570471013

hai dimenticato di mettere questo landuse come membro inner del landuse=forest
(non sò più come dirtelo)
eggie (2018-03-17 14:10:42+00:00): nette edit
eggie (2018-03-17 14:07:18+00:00): Oke. keurige bijdrage. Bij een officieel wandelpad.. blauwe bord is het highway=footway.. zonder bord bijna altijd =path
demon_box (2018-03-17 17:27:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570471399

hai dimenticato di mettere questo landuse come membro inner del landuse=forest
eggie (2018-03-17 14:54:57+00:00): Van dat stuk bos heb ik de multipolygoon afgehaald. Dat hoeft niet in dit geval. Gewoon één polygoon van gemaakt.
Een multipolygoon maakje bv als je water in dat bos wilt laten zien.
eggie (2018-03-17 14:05:34+00:00): oke...
eggie (2018-03-17 14:05:50+00:00): Probeer wel steeds je commentaar aan te passen.
demon_box (2018-03-17 17:26:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570471820

hai dimenticato di mettere questo landuse come membro inner del landuse=forest
atcomapper (2018-03-17 14:06:03+00:00): Du kan bruge https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction i stedet for din note om retning 015
eggie (2018-03-17 14:15:22+00:00): Rond het info bord ligt een lijn (polygoon) met als tag area = yes. Dat doet echter niets op de kaart. Wat is precies je bedoeling hier? Graag reactie.
Hjart (2018-03-17 14:32:07+00:00): Jeg har "snappet" de her låger til stien så de virker efter hensigten.
Søren L (2018-03-17 21:13:05+00:00): Tak. Glemte funktionen.
GOwin (2018-03-19 08:01:16+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

I've been wondering about your #CTVS hashtag in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57267527
Hjart (2018-03-17 14:38:15+00:00): Jeg har rullet dette tilbage. Objekterne er ikke overflødige
eggie (2018-03-17 14:33:31+00:00): correct..het is een link
stephankn (2018-05-27 06:05:07+00:00): Thank you for trying to contribute. Please do not just draw lines and label them roads. At least try to have them follow the road in reality. DigitalGlobe imagery show the road clearly and you painted straight across the building. You might want to get in touch with some experienced mappers for support on getting started.
jeka p (2018-12-14 08:27:53+00:00): Hallo Gerold,

statt löschen, bitte besser ausbessern:
- maxspeed=DE:urban auf maxspeed=50 & source:maxspeed=DE:urban.

Jetzt muss ich wieder Maxspeedaufzeichnungen machen.

Gruss,
Jeka
BAGgeraar (2026-03-12 18:31:30+00:00): Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570467748 Nog een weg met alleen area=yes. Wat zou het zijn?
eggie (2026-03-12 18:36:57+00:00): Hoi.. Voor nu geen idee. Geen actieve herinnering aan 😀
Denk dat ik hier iets gerepareerd heb 8 j geleden  nav screening.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2026-03-12 18:58:32+00:00): Voor nu even leisure=garden toegevoegd in een mp als inner. Het is een beeldentuin.
Mapper heeft nooit gereageerd op opmerkingen.
Hier heb ik alleen selfintersecting ways gerepareerd. 
https://dagvanhetkasteel.nl/bezoek-kastelen/listing/landgoed-weleveld/
en
https://www.groene-poort.nl/index.php?id=1079&view=1266



Groet,
eggie
eggie (2018-03-17 14:35:22+00:00): Veld Koeltechniek hoort niet op gebouw maar op de adresnode. Ik zal het aanpassen. Het gebouw heeft niet de naam van het bedrijf.
eggie (2018-03-17 14:38:31+00:00): De naam heb ik op de adresnode gezet samen met office=company
eggie (2018-03-17 14:32:21+00:00): Nuttige actie, want alles is natuurlijk veranderd hier. Wanneer je de landuse van vorm veranderd zul je ook de bron moeten veranderen. source=3dshapes (import) zul je moeten veranderen in bv source=local knowledge of survey.
SapientGuy (2018-03-17 16:19:40+00:00): Duidelijk, zal ik in de toekomst doen!
GOwin (2018-03-19 08:00:46+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

I've been wondering about your #CTVS hashtag in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57268120
GOwin (2018-03-19 08:00:35+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

I've been wondering about your #CTVS hashtag in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57268170
GOwin (2018-03-19 08:00:17+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

I've been wondering about your #CTVS hashtag in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57268235
eggie (2018-03-17 15:32:53+00:00): Probeer de adresnodes in tact te laten.. Please don't delete the adressnode.
lluv (2018-03-17 16:17:41+00:00): There were two addressnodes for house numbers 49-55 before. So a think it's actually correct now?
eggie (2018-03-17 16:45:48+00:00): Oke.. thanks for your answer.
corfede (2018-03-26 20:50:31+00:00): Ciao Cartop, ti segnalo che i nomi delle strade per convenzione OSM, debbono iniziare con la lettera maiuscola, quindi "Via" e non "via", "Viale" e non "viale". Ciao, Federico.
maraf24 (2018-03-18 19:21:45+00:00): footway to nie jest chodnik, ale droga dla pieszych. Piesi nie przechodzą w tym miejscu na drugą stronę ulicy, tylko idą przez to coś. Do rysowania chodników jest area:highway.
maro21 (2018-03-18 20:08:50+00:00): Źle napisałem. Ścieżki też nie ma. Tutaj jest parking.
maraf24 (2018-03-18 20:24:45+00:00): Nie widziałem tam znaku o parkingu.
maraf24 (2018-03-18 20:29:35+00:00): Tu masz podobne miejsce:
https://goo.gl/maps/LNWPJQ4XTwF2
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379767099
maro21 (2018-03-18 21:21:52+00:00): Nie jest ani trochę podobne...
maraf24 (2018-03-28 10:12:00+00:00): Jak mam to rozumieć? Widzisz tam chodnik?  Wyznaczoną drogę rowerową?
maro21 (2018-03-28 18:01:47+00:00): Napisałem już że nie chodziło mi o chodnik. W przykładzie który podałeś piesi mogą fizycznie przejść. Na alei pracy nie mogą fizycznie przejść bez wchodzenia na jezdnię. Nie rysuj czegoś bez sprawdzenia w terenie. 

Nie ja sobie to wymyśliłem, tylko rozwiązałem uwagę fixme, która wisiała już dwa lata, gdzie ktoś już przede mną zauważył, że tędy piesi nie przejdą. Żeby dojść do CB radia, trzeba wejść na ulicę. Teraz widzę że to ty sam dodałeś to FIXME!
highflyer74 (2018-03-18 10:40:41+00:00): Moin!

Bitte wieder ein wenig auf die Bremse treten... Schau Dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parking%20entrance?uselang=de an. Das wird nicht für private Garagen verwendet.

Auch private Pools in Gärten sind eher fragwürdig, zumal die meist gar nicht permanent dort stehen, sondern nur im Sommer aufgebaut werden. Diese sollten dann auch nicht gemappt werden.

Du mappst private Grundstücke in einem Detailgrad, der fragwürdig ist. Einige Dinge kann man auf dem Luftbild nicht erkennen und ich bezweifle, dass Du die Grundstücke alle selbst betreten hast.

Ich wiederhole: manchmal ist weniger mehr... 

Es wäre sehr viel sinnvoller (aber auch da wiederhole ich mich), wenn Du Deine Mapping-Energie auf Dinge lenkst, die für die Nutzer der Daten auch sinnvoll sind. Wie steht es z.B. mit der Aktualität von Geschäften und anderen POIs in Deiner Gegend? Sind die in OSM vorhandenen Telefonzellen auch in Wirklichkeit noch da, oder schon abgebaut? Stimmen die Leerungszeiten der Briefkästen noch? Sind alle Adressen vorhanden?

Tonnenweise Fußwege in Oma Ernas Garten bringen niemandem etwas. Noch nicht einmal Oma Erna. Wir "malen" hier keine Karte, sondern wollen etwas schaffen, was für alle nutzbar und wertvoll ist. Bitte noch einmal drüber nachdenken.

Danke!
GOwin (2018-03-19 07:59:31+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

This object you drew is leisure=pool, and not waterway=pool.

I've been wondering about your #CTVS hashtag in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57268521
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:26:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
PierZen (2018-03-17 15:11:18+00:00): J'ai ajouté plusieurs relations au cours des derniers jours territoires Regions, MRC, Municipalites du Québec. Je révise et corrige aujourd'hui lorsque non fermé. 

Pour eviter conflits d'édition, evitez svp de modifier relations.
FvGordon (2018-03-17 15:19:20+00:00): Now I am completed with fixing boundary outlines to make them closed loops.
GOwin (2018-03-19 07:58:26+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

I've been wondering about your #CTVS in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57268940
user_5359 (2018-03-17 17:09:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
NeilsWorld (2018-03-17 17:56:05+00:00): I guess I do not know what you mean. I am sorry. I found this online... and when I went to make a correction because it was off by quite a bit... I was just updating it. Am I not suppose to do that?
You can email  me direct if you want to.
Neil
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-07-03 08:44:50+00:00): What is the license of this municipality dataset?

(see also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2019-July/006084.html )
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-09 07:49:39+00:00): reverted as an undiscussed import, likely a copyright violation. Such imports may be reverted by anyone, without discussion but in this case it happened in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57269387 on talk-lv, on imports mailing list.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75444048
M!dgard (2018-05-25 16:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/59276310 with reason "this is not how it's documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway%3Djunction"
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-07-03 08:44:59+00:00): What is the license of this municipality dataset?

(see also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2019-July/006084.html )
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-09 07:52:58+00:00): reverted as an undiscussed import, likely a copyright violation. Such imports may be reverted by anyone, without discussion but in this case it happened in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57269387 on talk-lv, on imports mailing list.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75444230
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-09 08:10:29+00:00): Note - revert is not 100% completed. See https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/18214#ticket
maciek-szn (2018-03-17 16:10:45+00:00): Wycofałem Twoje zmiany z następujących powodów:
- zepsułeś geometrię ulic w rejonie pętli Basen Górniczy,
- torowiska tramwajowe nie mają nazwy "2, 7, 8". Kursują nimi te linie tramwajowe, ale powinny one być (i są) naniesione jako relacje.
Nakaner (2018-03-19 20:47:57+00:00): Hi Pēteris Brūns,

welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Imports like this changeset have to be discussed with the community in beforehand and documented on the Imports mailing list. When did you discuss this import on the international Imports mailing list? Where can I find its documentation on the OSM wiki?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for further information.

Best regards

Michael
Pēteris Brūns (2018-03-20 09:16:34+00:00): Hi Michael,

you are completely right, this import is made ignoring guidelines. Import was made as final commit in local, Valmiera Mapping party last WE, after discussion locally and with other local mapper accept (yes, someone also warned about import guidelines but...). Data used for import are from local municipality, the data are Public data, subset we have for mapping needs is located for download here http://gisnet.lv/~kartes/OSM/valmiera2018/

Source data are classified according local legislation (https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=246998), only in Latvian. Originally data are in EPSG:3059, published SHP files are already transformed version in EPSG:4326.
The data will be prepared also as WMS service for reference, only few objects (point type) from all content is possible extract and tag as needed for import. Data are high scale, therefore linear and area objects often are partial, so is needed manual work. Extract, cleanup and import was done only with tree point data and is no planed with other content.

Thread about mapping party was sent here https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2018-March/006035.html and also mentioned data availability from municipalities. Aggre that is not exacly discussion about import.
GerdP (2019-01-18 15:01:59+00:00): I've noticed this changeset because of a common typo in more than 26000 nodes:
leaf_type=broadl-leaved
instead of
leaf_type=broadleaved
Why wasn't this cs reverted?
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-07-03 05:11:36+00:00): "Source data are classified according local legislation (https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=246998), only in Latvian. " - what is license of this data?

"Why wasn't this cs reverted?" - nobody decided to do it so far, but note that as undiscussed import anybody may delete all objects added in this changeset, at any time, without any discussion.

Given no response from importer and that it is a single use account I am considering doing this (but feel free to revert if you think that response to questions, especially ones about copyright is unlikely)
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-07-03 08:45:33+00:00): I started https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2019-July/006084.html but given extremely low traffic I am also considering reply as unlikely.
Raitisx (2019-07-05 13:53:36+00:00): Data layers are measured by surveyors, which can't be copyrighted. In this area, measurements are aggregated by municipality. Municipality initiated and supported the mapping party and provided some of the layers. If this is an absolute necessity, then I think it is not a problem to get official permission (as it was done few times in other areas), but from logical sense, it is the same as you would ask written permission from homeowner to enter premises, but after the party...
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-07-17 10:08:50+00:00): > Data layers are measured by surveyors, which can't be copyrighted.

Why it can't be protected by copyright or copyright-like restriction (see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sui_generis_database_right )?
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-07-17 10:13:37+00:00): I started thread on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
gormo (2019-08-29 11:52:39+00:00): Please get a written permission from the municipality!
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-09 07:47:45+00:00): revert as an undiscussed import, likely a copyright violation. Such imports may be reverted by anyone, without discussion but in this case it happened in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57269387 on talk-lv, on imports mailing list.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75443910
juhanjuku (2018-04-19 14:53:38+00:00): You have imported huge amount of trees in Valmiera. Now many of them are inside buildings or on road. Do you plan to adjust also houses and roads to more exact place?
You seems to have high scale source.
Do you have permission to use this source?
Pēteris Brūns (2018-04-19 16:12:50+00:00): About data and source of use already explained in this thread https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57269387#map=14/57.5362/25.4167
In general the same commit. You are right, the data are highscale. In short term I have no plan, time, to adjust all the roads, buildings etc., but data to improve that all are available for anyone. Data source contains also buildings and detailed road data, but that content requires huge manual work, to simplify work for other interested in is plan to set up simple WMS service using source data.
juhanjuku (2018-04-22 07:11:48+00:00): Please let me know when WMS is available
juhanjuku
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-07-03 08:45:45+00:00): I started https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lv/2019-July/006084.html but given extremely low traffic I am also considering reply as unlikely.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-09 08:00:37+00:00): reverted as an undiscussed import, likely a copyright violation. Such imports may be reverted by anyone, without discussion but in this case it happened in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57269387 on talk-lv, on imports mailing list.

Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75444491#map=13/57.5330/25.4180
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-09 08:10:45+00:00): Note - revert is not 100% complete See https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/18214#ticket