piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MapGardener (2017-10-11 15:13:38+00:00): Hi!

First of all, thank you for your quick reply! I'm sorry for the confusion regarding "in-site links". I mean those links which do not point to a whole Wikipedia article but a section thereof. I.e. links following the scheme "de:foo#bar" (Sorry, I don't know the exact term for those links which point to a subsection.) From my point of view, these links are not ideal but correct. They point to the concept which is described in the section. For instance node ID 935343113 and 326086904 (see [1]) have a Wikipedia Tag which points to exactly one section in an article. That article just lists several objects and one section describes the item from OSM. By following the Wikipedia link, exactly that item is addressed and not the entire list of objects.
Unfortunately, for these kind of links no Wikidata object was created yet. Hence, there is only one Wikidata ID for the entire list. Adding the Wikidata ID of the entire list obviously creates a spurious entry in OSM. I don't know why the importing tool failed to handle the list article but I'm quite sure that it is not handled correctly.
I agree with you that someone who is speaking German should better check and adjust the Wikidata entries. There may be other corner cases which arn't addressed so far. Since there are so many items in the changeset, I'll have no time to verify a significant amount of them. But just for the sake of curiosity, I will probably have a look at the import tool.
I hope I was able to explain my issues with section ("in-site") links and ask you again to take appropriate action on them. Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards,
Michael
rmikke (2017-10-11 21:29:13+00:00): 1. The tool I have linked is not an import tool. It's a QA tool, that addresses exactly the problems you mention and more. You can use it e.g. to identify all the disambiguation articles in wikidata=* tags (shown on map), then go and correct whatever you can.
2. Oooops, I can see the problem with links to sections and I'm not quite sure how to deal with it. @matkoniecz is working on tool comparing wikipedia=* and wikidata=* tags (i.e. whether they point to the same article), maybe that will help to identify such cases.
MapGardener (2017-10-15 10:07:40+00:00): Hi rmikke!

Ad 1) I looked at the tool (Wikipedia Plugin + SPARQL service) in slightly more detail and it looks quire powerful and impressive. You are right, it's surely not a tool which can only be used for imports. I also see several new opportunities in linking OSM and Wikidata. In order to get useful results on querying OSM+Wikidata, I strongly believe its very important to keep the quality of Wikidata entries as high as possible. Especially linking to wrong Wikidata concepts (e.g. to a list instead of an entry or to a person instead of a museum) may drastically decrease the value of the service.
Ad 2.) I've also tries to further asses the quality of your changeset via Overpass and to be honest - I'm not really satisfied with the way how section links on Wikipedia are handled. You may want to run the query below on http://overpass-turbo.eu/ to get an impression on how many entries were affected by your edit in Austria. If I'm not mistaken, there are for instance 2546 nodes with a section link in your changeset. Please revert or fix those entries. Thank you in advance.

Best regards,
Michael 

--------------------------------------
[out:json];
// fetch area “Austria” to search in
{{geocodeArea:Austria}}->.searchArea;
// gather results
(
  // query part for: “wikipedia="*#*"”
  node["wikipedia"~".*#.*"](area.searchArea)(user:rmikke);
  way["wikipedia"~".*#.*"](area.searchArea)(user:rmikke);
  relation["wikipedia"~".*#.*"](area.searchArea)(user:rmikke);
);
// print results
out body;
>;
out skel qt;
rmikke (2017-10-19 09:09:54+00:00): I intend to remove wikidata entries where wikipedia link points to a section of Wikipedia article and exclude such cases from query in future, see [1]. However, it seems strange that there are so many cases - AFAIR that's about the number of all changes I have made in Austria...


[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-October/079138.html
MapGardener (2017-10-21 08:55:44+00:00): Thank you very much for taking action! It sounds indeed strange that the number of section link items is that high. AFAIR, there was quite some Wikipedia/Wikidata-related activity some time ago but I can hardly believe that nearly all changes in the changeset were section links. Maybe I've made a mistake with the Overpass query. I'll double check it in the next few days and let you know whether I've found an explanation.
Best regards, Michael
MapGardener (2017-10-26 13:34:58+00:00): I double checked the query and it seems to be correct. However, I was first confused by the high number of nodes which was displayed by overpass. It turned out that the number of nodes which is displayed at overpass-turbo.eu includes all nodes of every returned object. Not only those nodes with a Wikipedia section-link tag. If for instance a street with 20 nodes is tagged by a Wikipedia tag, 20 nodes are added to the total number of nodes.
I counted the number of affected Wikipedia/Wikidata tags and there were only 224 cases which still need to be considered. Thats about 3.3% of the changes in your changeset, which sounds plausible to me. I hope my investigations are helpful for fixing the invalid cases which were introduced by the changeset.

Best regards,
Michael
user_5359 (2017-10-09 18:40:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Are you the new tenants of the properties of the Frontier Bank?
Jason Harrison (2017-10-25 05:56:18+00:00): Thanks for the edit!  Be careful: one of the road networks you added didn't intersect properly (which causes routing problems).  I fixed it for you.

https://imgur.com/a/YhbjL
deadoth (2017-10-25 15:01:19+00:00): Good catch! Thanks for fixing that.
freebeer (2018-11-11 11:18:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64371907 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another Pair Of bogus maps.me castles that do not exist
Jason Harrison (2017-10-25 05:28:17+00:00): Thanks for adding this!  I split the building into 4 segments to reflect reality, and I added the parking lot.
fmcfad01 (2017-11-12 00:41:37+00:00): Nice!  There are probably some parking lots around the building and the Marriott that could be added!  Also, there is a Uhaul across the street on 38.
Jason Harrison (2017-10-25 05:15:28+00:00): I improved your edits and added the Wawa parking lot and gas station.  Thanks!
user_5359 (2017-10-09 18:34:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
user_5359 (2017-10-09 18:28:07+00:00): For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .

see node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5157532204
user_5359 (2017-10-09 18:11:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
user_5359 (2017-10-09 18:20:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5156306090 for the description of the center. The name of the center should be Fred Tyler?? I chnaged it to Sakya Buddhist Center.

If something  is wrong, don’t hesitate to contact me for help.
JJIglesias (2017-10-10 20:35:45+00:00): Saludos y excelente trabajo aunque muy demorado creo yo.
Podrias considerar marcar mas bien los Predios o Parcelas como areas? usando los Tags AREA=YES PLACE=PLOT de forma q a futuro a cada parcela se le pueda poner un numero en la respectiva calle. De resto bonito trabajo de dar forma a cada Building=House
user_5359 (2017-10-09 18:04:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add your node directly over a existing node (a florist=Centreville Florist). Did this business also exists or are you the new tenants of the properties?
5m4u9 (2017-10-10 05:39:11+00:00): estuve mejorando toda esa zona que editaron, algunas cosas estan mal hechas como mapear parcelas como edificios completos.

las manzanas hay que crear areas residenciales tipo city_block
lyctkel (2021-05-16 04:28:21+00:00): Hi Kazzi prashant,
currently I'm removing the obsolete payment method ep_cash from OSM (used in Europe). I'm surprised to find ep_cash here. Was ep_cash used here and can it be removed or is ep_cash a typo and should be corrected?
Greetings from the Netherlands
lyctkel
Warin61 (2019-10-01 01:09:46+00:00): Hi
The Servicetonj Rec. Reserve pitch has sport=football .. that is too generic .. soccer, Ozie rules? Which 'football' is it?
Glenhope1 (2019-10-01 01:16:24+00:00): It's Australia mate and it's an oval. Only one kind of football played here. (Soccer and rugby use rectangles.)
literan (2017-10-09 10:54:35+00:00): Good day. Please do not add wrong addresses to PIs (look at the building for the right one). Also, Camorra is not the restaurant but pub (place, where you can drink the beer, pizza is a small adding only)
literan (2017-10-09 10:54:55+00:00): to PIs=to POIs
enotramone (2017-10-11 19:03:08+00:00): Hi, thanks for review, but I strongly disagree that Camorra is a pub. Pizza is a main course and cafe beer is an addition. Take a look how this place promote itself – pizza https://vk.com/camorrapizza
It attends restaurants (not pub) festivals https://www.facebook.com/camorrapizza/photos/pcb.1971427289804436/1971426969804468/?type=3&theater
And Afisha claims it as a pizzeria https://www.afisha.ru/msk/restaurant/374931/
literan (2017-10-12 07:34:56+00:00): They promote itself: https://www.facebook.com/pg/camorrapizza/about/?ref=page_internal - "Маленький пивной бар с необычным пивом и уличная пиццерия". Вы понимаете русский язык? In addition, I visited this place last week, and saw that almost every visitor drank beer, but pizza was not popular. Also, they have only 4 types of pizza but hundreds beers
enotramone (2017-10-12 08:28:34+00:00): Отлично понимаю. I'm also been there and many times in their Saint-Petersburg place and it's first of all pizza place with great beer choice.
literan (2017-10-12 10:28:23+00:00): Тогда давайте по-русски. По правилам https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant "amenity=restaurant — это предприятие общественного питания с широким ассортиментом блюд сложного приготовления, где посетители сидят за столиками и их обслуживают официанты." - в Каморре ничего из этого нет.
literan (2017-10-12 10:29:51+00:00): Ну и цитаты из вашей ссылки в vk: "Camorra Pizza e Birra - это новый проект AF Brew & Co. Здесь мы скрестили маленький пивной бар с необычным пивом, каких в последние годы стало особенно много в римском Трастевере, и уличную пиццерию" - т.е. первично бар. Из фейсбука - "Маленький пивной бар с необычным пивом и уличная пиццерия".
enotramone (2017-10-12 12:09:48+00:00): Убедительно
eggie (2017-10-09 06:44:58+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-10-09 06:47:41+00:00): Graag in het commentaar je edit omschrijven. Dus added surface= paved  oid
eggie (2017-10-09 06:48:42+00:00): dus.. "building level toegevoegd"
eggie (2017-10-09 06:52:10+00:00): "Brandgang toegevoegd." Brangangen zijn geen footway al zie je dat vaak. Om te voorkomen dat ze gaan routeren in gps kun je het beste access=private meegeven.
foot=yes moet eraf. 
Misschien wel beter is om al die brandgangen niet te tekenen, maar daar zijn de meningen over verdeeld.
Heb je nog vragen.. stel ze gerust.
eggie (2017-10-09 09:16:50+00:00): PB met welkom want ook de edits van wheelmap komen in OSM
ManuelGiron4 (2017-10-10 19:54:46+00:00): I think you did a great job with your edits, they look properly done. I also liked that fact that you changed a point to an actual area. I noticed that while I was working but did not change it to an actual area, I will go back and do so. A small question, something I did not do myself, would be to ask why these edits had not been done before, I found it odd that points surrounding my edits had already been done, but my specific edits had not been. I found absolutely nothing wrong with your edits, they were great! Great job Sloan!

-Manny Giron
4004 (2017-10-09 21:49:15+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
если здание действительно представляетсобой гараж, и размещена в нем только 1 компания, то все верно
Constable (2017-10-09 17:26:38+00:00): grazie per le due correzioni! non mi ero accorto di aver lasciato due way non connesse ed un nodo doppio
eggie (2017-10-09 07:40:41+00:00): opnieuw welkom bij OSM per PB gestuurd
A67-A67 (2017-10-16 12:34:47+00:00): In deze wijziging worden beide delen van het 'hofje' in de Knotwilgenlaan samengevoegd. Dit mag alleen als allebei de delen exact dezelfde tags en relaties hebben, wat hier niet het geval is. Over het oostelijke deel loopt namelijk een knooppuntenfietsroute naar het pad richting de Meiboomlaan. Daarom heb ik de weg weer gesplitst.
5m4u9 (2017-10-09 13:56:25+00:00): hola, gracias por mapear y mejorar, sobretodo los árboles! :)

Sería bueno añadir los nombres de las calles y si es de asfalto o concreto y así...
dieterdreist (2017-12-17 22:31:54+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai aggiunto un bridge=yes (proprietà che indica in oggetto si trova su un ponte) ad un ponte (man_made=bridge). (Ponte Cavour). Non ha molto senso, in quanto Ponte Cavour è un ponte, ma non si trova su un ponte.
wambacher (2017-10-11 15:17:47+00:00): Hi, you are right. this is an disputed area.

BUT: it is still an adminitrative area too. And that is more important to osm.

all three objects (relation and the two boundaries in the north and south are tagged as "disputed". and that is enough.

changed it back to adminitrative.

regards
walter
DD1GJ (2017-10-09 19:39:35+00:00): Hallo meierleu, ich bezweifle sehr stark Deine "Lokale Erkundung". Da geht ein Fußweg ebenerdig über die Bahnhofsunterführung. Auf dem aktuellen Bing-Bild ist das sehr schwer zu erkennen, auf DigitalGlobe Standard schon eher. Ich habe daher diesen Änderungssatz zurückgesetzt.

Viele Grüße aus Baden-Baden, Joachim
meierleu (2017-10-10 14:12:26+00:00): Hallo Joachim
Doch, ich war vor Ort und mir fehlte im OsmAnd der Fussweg vom P+R (südwestlich vom Bf-Gebäude) zu den Gleisen. Deshalb hatte ich mir den Fussweg mit dem OSMTracker aufgezeichnet. Leider habe ich zu Hause diesen Track nicht sofort erfasst. Ich habe gestern gesehen, dass der Fussweg schon vorhanden war und meinte etwas voreilig, es fehle lediglich diese Verknüpfung. Vielen Dank, dass Du dies wieder zurück korrigiert hast. 
Viele Grüsse vom Rheinfall (mit h)
Walter
hsimpson (2017-10-09 15:45:33+00:00): Hi coconut,
du hast um Feedback für dein Changeset gebeten!
Es gibt zwei gebräuchliche Arten, Fußgängerampeln zu erfassen:
-
1.: highway=traffic_signals + crossing=traffic_signals in einem Punkt, der mittig auf dem Überweg liegen sollte.
-
2.(genauer): Zwei Punkte: highway=traffic_signals mittig auf die Haltelinie für die Autos und highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_signals mittig auf den Überweg.
-
Option 1 sollte nur verwendet werden, wenn es sich nur um einen Überweg handelt. Ist das ganze ein komplexeres Gebilde, z.B. eine Kreuzung, bitte immer getrennte Nodes verwenden, da ansonsten zu viele Ampeln für die Autos erkannt werden.
-
Der von dir verwendete key "highway_1" wird von keinem Programm ausgelesen werden können. Solltest du einmal mehrere values für einen key eintragen wollen, dann trag diese hintereinander ein, getrennt durch ein ; (ohne Leerzeichen!) Aber auch diese Art sollte nach Möglichkeit vermieden werden, außer für Key, wo standartmäßig mehrere Values eingetragen werden!
-
Ich hoffe, ich konnte behilflich sein!
Grüße
kartler175 (2017-10-10 07:57:03+00:00): Wenn der Straßenabschnitt gesperrt ist, bitte die Sperre an der bestehenden Straße eintragen un keine neue fiktive Zick-Zackstraße erfinden.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-10 11:29:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52788582 where the changeset comment is: Revert newbie error/vandalism (I am not sure how to classify this properly). Please do not randomly draw geometries into OSM. Use proper tags for roads under construction, instead.
whb (2017-10-10 11:15:25+00:00): Falsche Straßenseite, verbessert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5156688321/history
whb (2017-10-10 11:20:44+00:00): Duplikat, entfernt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5156647221/history
Falsche Straßenseite, verbessert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5156688321/history
user_5359 (2017-10-09 17:06:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you really want to add two nodes (one only with name)?

If you need help: You are welcome!
S-zation (2017-10-14 23:35:30+00:00): This changeset deleted the Voorhees label off of the map.  Reverted in 52942668.
eggie (2017-10-09 09:13:42+00:00): Moeilijk na te gaan of je al een welkomstmail hebt ontvangen met nuttige tips en links. In ieder geval bij deze..per PB  ... en anders dubbel
Mar Mar (2017-10-12 21:52:39+00:00): Hi meilandharezty,
I see you have just started contributing recently, so first of all a big thank you and a huge welcome!!
You've done a good job adding these roads and especially all the builings, it sure took some time :) Nevertheless, I´d like to make two suggestions (and I am not the biggest expert either, so I'm open to discussion): 
1. When creating buildings it is common best practice to make them really square. Even though in real life they generally aren´t 100%, in OSM we tend to make them completely square, unless the form is really strange. In the ID editor this is very easy: Just draw the builings as best as you can, then press the "S" key.
2. Most of the roads you have traced have been classified as "Track". As there are no specific tagging guidelines for Indonesia (there are for other countries) the normal definitions should be applied. In this case we are dealing with lines that connect different communities/villages, sometimes they are the most important connection. For this reason I suggest to use either "tertiary" (the bigger ones), or "unclassified" (lowest level of interconnection). Highway= track is defined as: "roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc".
I hope this makes sense to you and has helped a little bit. In any case, thanks again for contributing!
Marcos
eggie (2017-10-09 11:02:22+00:00): Probeer eens svp uit te zoeken hoe je commentaar levert bij je edits. Andere Go Mappers doen dat wel.
user_6110846 (2017-10-14 18:45:50+00:00): Щасти Вам . Ми раді новим маперам . Проте як зазвичай Ви допускаєте помилки . Велике прохання саме основне. Зайдіть на josm.de та завантажте спеціальну програму . У цій програмі є вмонтовані готові комбінації тегів. Редагуваті через програму браузер не зручно  і проcто заcтаріло . Правки початківців після ІД потрібно повністю перетеговувати. Тому якщо хочете розвитку у проекті закиньте ІД і перейдіть на прогу. Щодо ціє правки то Ви порушили домовленість української спільноти створену на загальних вироблених часом правилах та технології проекту. Ц я дорога є нежитловою а проїздом (service) Невеликі тупикові відгалуження від вулиці-автобану які післ ядекілької житл будинків переходять у під'їзд до офісу лісництва є service.      Вхід у пізнанні  теґів, Дотримуйтесь якщо є української схеми (зверху кнопка українська )також зареєструйтесь на forum.openstreetmap.org (Ukraine) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:highwayhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Az:Map_Features#.D0.9F.D1.80.D0.B8.D1.80.D0.BE.D0.B4.D0.BD.D1.8B.D0.B5_.D0.BE.D0.B1.D1.80.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.BE.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F_.28Natural.29
user_6110846 (2017-10-14 18:53:04+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:highway
Вхід у теґи 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9E%D0%B1%27%D1%94%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B8_%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8
Commodoortje (2017-10-13 21:57:07+00:00): Waarom zet je deze weg om van unclassified naar tertiary?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6557412
Chris Lawrence (2017-10-13 17:16:50+00:00): First, the description of this changeset is incorrect (Macon isn't Atlanta). Second, and perhaps more importantly, I'm not sure why you moved the alignment of this road since it hasn't actually moved in reality...
Teesta (2017-10-16 03:56:39+00:00): The description I've added by mistakenly and the alignment  was based on the ESRi image. Thank you for pointing out this mistake and also for the correction .
eggie (2017-10-09 14:22:05+00:00): Dit soort straten zijn dus highway=residential. Verander je dit zelf?
majid1359 (2017-10-09 10:03:18+00:00): اصلاحیه
yaugenka (2017-10-12 22:34:37+00:00): Здравствуйте! Не удаляйте пожалуйста точки label населенных пунктов, как было сделано здесь:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2122125
Сейчас все населенные пункты республики представлены отношением в которое входят линии обозначающие условную административную границу и точка label в которой выводится название. Т.е. информация о населенном пункте задается не в линии, а в отношении и точке.
Кірыла (2017-10-13 05:26:16+00:00): Дзякуй за заўвагу! Улічу пры наступных праўках.
user_5359 (2017-10-09 16:47:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think you live in the middle of a parking area.

If you need help: You are welcome!
eggie (2017-10-09 11:06:19+00:00): Hier zit het nieuw getekende bos vastgeplakt aan de landuse=residential van balk. Daarom lijkt het ook zo'n groot gebied waar je hebt gemapt.
Wanneer iemand iets verschuift komt alles mee... dat is niet de bedoeling.
eggie (2017-10-09 11:16:59+00:00): De landuse residential heb ik weer losgemaakt .. graag reactie zodat we weten dat je dat hebt begrepen.
eggie (2017-10-09 14:15:47+00:00): De landuse waar geen bebouwing komt heb ik hersteld .. ook rond de vijver.
eggie (2017-10-09 12:55:37+00:00): Dag Lars, graag commentaar bij je edits.
DaveF (2017-10-11 12:17:25+00:00): Hi again Bob
Could you explain your reason for the turn restriction, Are you sure a bike can't turn right into Bragg's Lane?
http://tinyurl.com/y7sjerwg
BobC76 (2017-10-11 13:12:45+00:00): That's an error, removed it.
literan (2017-10-12 22:59:21+00:00): Не надо, пожалуйста, менять статус Рыбного на service. Это обычная улица со знаком "движение запрещено" и ограничением скорости (от Безымянного). Так что - highway=unclassified
maxspeed=20
surface=paving_stones
motor_vehicle=destination
iWowik (2017-10-13 08:33:21+00:00): Эта улица служит только для подъезда к расположенным объектам, На середине даже теперь висит кирпич. 
Так что это точно сервис, как он определен в вики.
iWowik (2017-10-13 08:35:53+00:00): Ипатьевский и Никольский, в общем-то аналогичны.
Ну а unclassified в городе, в жилой застройке, сильно спорно - чего же это не residential?
literan (2017-10-13 10:25:16+00:00): Я там был 10 дней назад (вон, даже заметки висят мои еще), после поворота на Безымянный переулок при движении на юг висит знак "движение запрещено" (баранка), никакого "кирпича" там нет - т.е. там разрешен проезд фактически всем кроме транзита. А unclassified - потому что там нет никакой жилой застройки, все здания нежилые. Если не ошибаюсь, между Никольской и Варваркой в принципе нет ни одного жилого дома.
ndm (2017-10-09 12:15:33+00:00): You seem to be trying to change the map tagging to fix cycle routing - unless there's an obvious error or ommision this is considered bad practice. If routing software isn't working correctly please file a bug with its developers, rather than "tagging for the router".
DaveF (2017-10-09 16:34:23+00:00): A bit blurred, but the bicycle symbol can just about be made out. http://osmz.ru/imagery/#19/51.46386/-2.55220/esri

Are there any bollards?
BobC76 (2017-10-10 15:30:33+00:00): Yes there are bollards - its not correctly designated as its not a "service road".