piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
flo2154 (2022-10-03 12:01:19+00:00): This Mapillary image shows that the bicycle rental type should be "docking_station" rather than "dropoff_point": https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.110942899972&lng=11.715193799972&z=17&pKey=101572729214870&focus=photo&x=0.5121559170090673&y=0.5347028746518048&zoom=0

Was the image in StreetComplete unclear?
bollyboll (2022-10-04 06:14:50+00:00): No, it is very clear. I must have hit the wrong button by mistake. I'm sorry, I'll correct it in a moment.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-01 08:19:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention to the next point:
You did not connect the nodes of a road you mapped to another, existing road.  Be sure to connect roads to each other.






Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126808637
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
skquinn (2022-09-30 09:07:12+00:00): Hi,

Please be careful when editing. You appear to have deleted highway=secondary on a section of Beechnut Street; this causes it to disappear from the map completely as well as no longer be considered for routing purposes.

Based on what I remember of the area, 15042 Beechnut Street would be much farther west than you have placed it. In fact, the surrounding area, the new location of Marti Golf Center, has an address of 12782 Beechnut Street. Are you sure this is in the right location?
hatul (2022-10-18 19:18:49+00:00): מה הרעיון להוסיף שער סגור למעיין? המעיין נגיש, מחקתי את התגיות המיותרות.
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 08:39:41+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-30 10:19:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126809054
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
highflyer74 (2022-09-30 07:19:04+00:00): Moin! Ist dieser halbe Roman wirklich der Name der Praxis?

Schau dir bitte auch nochmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare an. Dort findest du die gültigen Werte. Grundsätzlich sind die Attribute (Tags) in englischer Sprache.

Wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich gern!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Glassman (2022-10-01 23:56:42+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126809390
Glassman (2022-10-01 23:57:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126809390
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:31:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-30 22:31:11+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
goedegazelle (2022-09-30 07:37:46+00:00): Is berg en bos geen openbaar park meer?
byckel (2022-09-30 08:05:47+00:00): Is het volgens mij nooit geweest. Nu is het in ieder geval "opengesteld"
goedegazelle (2022-09-30 18:06:49+00:00): Oké, ik heb er eigenlijk nooit op gelet.
mariotomo (2022-10-01 12:00:31+00:00): hola. thank you for your improvements. it would be helpful to reviewers if you added a minimal description of what it is about, this challenge 27165. we surely can follow the link, but in a table view of the changeset we wish to review, a numerical link is more puzzling than informative. (¿Canada Spiky buildings?)
thank you for your patience!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-30 08:23:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Ik heb een officetag toegevoegd, want anders zie je niets op de kaart.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2022-09-30 15:15:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126809900
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-30 07:35:22+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=29.600863%2C-81.990214%2C16.98
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
literan (2022-09-30 20:52:37+00:00): добрый день

линиями highway обозначаются отдельные проезжие части, физически отделенные от других проезжих частей.

полосы движения и направления движения на площадях этими линиями не обозначаются
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
CorruptComputer (2022-09-30 15:48:09+00:00): Looks good, thank you for your contributions!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126810881
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-30 08:37:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...  Tip.. Beter een terugmelding doen richting Kadaster, want bij een periodieke opdracht heb je kans dat de oude vorm weer terugkomt.

Terugmelding kan via deze site
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Dorstige%20Hartsteeg%202&resultOffset=0&objectId=0344100000002278&geometry.x=136867.16000257&geometry.y=455464.87700042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0344010000123803




MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:31:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
bxl-forever (2022-09-30 08:40:18+00:00): Hello,

Please check again, there are still several tags related to the former bicycle shop on the building.
eggie (2022-09-30 08:43:48+00:00): Maar niet op mijn achtergrondbeelden. BING ligt verschoven als achtergrond en is outdated. 
Iets om rekening mee te houden.
Gebruik dan evt esri of de beelden die de Schotse mappers gebruiken.

MVG
eggie
gogorm (2022-09-30 20:19:08+00:00): Hi,
After reading the description it sounds like you may not have noticed that the cycle path is already mapped here.

The cycle lane information is already contained here, but using a different approach, whereby the information is stored in the road object itself (cycleway=shared_lane): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26655357#map=19/53.29020/-6.33535
pdelacy (2022-09-30 20:23:16+00:00): Yes, but the previous set up wasn't working when using route planners based on Openstreetmap data.
gogorm (2022-10-01 16:27:02+00:00): What do you mean wasn't working?
This is a common approach to mapping roads that have bicycle symbols painted on the general traffic lanes.
If the route planner doesn't understand cycleway=shared_lane, then I think that is a problem with the routing software, not the map data.

Using your approach, how would a route planner know the difference between this road, where cyclists share the lane with all other vehicles, and a segregated off-road cycle track such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011547038?
pdelacy (2022-10-01 16:41:27+00:00): Check out komoot.com and ridewithgps.com both excellent route planners for cyclists. Using the current set up give a torturous route from spawell to tallaght village. The Glenview lawns section appears unusable to cyclists. Best to fix the map data than try to get the software changed in my view.
gogorm (2022-10-01 16:53:48+00:00): I've checked out komoot, and I think I see what the problem is.
If you look at komoot's map (which currently shows the version of the map before your changes) somebody has disconnected the cycle track coming from the M50 underpass where it joins the main road at Glenview Lawns and instead connected it to a foot path. As a consequence, komoot thinks there is no way to cycle from Spawell to Tallaght village via Glenview Lawns.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077137370
pdelacy (2022-10-01 17:06:21+00:00): Exactly the problem I was trying to solve. If you have a solution please make the change. That area around the M50 underpass cycle ramp has been a problem area before which I previously fixed but someone messed it up again recently.