piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:18:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-04-07 08:45:12+00:00): Hi! Your changes are mainly in Canada, but contains one change in Italy. Can you double-check that it’s OK? ☺
SekeRob (2021-04-07 09:02:31+00:00): OK, unwittingly me bad. I did some edits in Halifax, Canada via tag editor, I saved them (I'm sure), and wheeled back home and added a disused railtag. How they got loaded in one set is a riddle to me, but have noticed that in the stats the tag editor change counts show fewer. They're all good though.
Apologies for this mishap.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-04-07 09:13:42+00:00): No worries ☺ Thanks for the check!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 11:38:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103409187 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
ash_win (2021-04-12 06:46:35+00:00): Hi williamfang,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential road.Kindly check with way 439340198
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102776801
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102453876
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 11:38:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103409187 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
ash_win (2021-04-09 11:51:47+00:00): Hi chenpoyu,
Fixed dragged way of residential and It was overlapping with other highway,Kindly check with way 864516301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102640126
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102453948
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 22:27:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103366307 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
Becky Candy (2021-05-11 14:10:37+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102454405
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 13:22:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108943189 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 13:22:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108943189 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
ash_win (2021-04-09 10:50:11+00:00): Hi jamlin,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential road.Kindly check with way 430732630
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102635251
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102454882
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 22:27:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103366307 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-22 10:53:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105127795 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Ser9ei (2021-05-02 08:04:30+00:00): Cliff ways direction to be re-checked.
ash_win (2021-04-09 10:40:58+00:00): Hi alicechang,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential road.Kindly check with way 428995190
way 428995073
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102634218
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102455153
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-03 19:00:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104075688 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
ash_win (2021-04-09 10:18:55+00:00): Hi changchiamin,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on secondary road.Kindly check with node 8610526489
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102632109
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102455789
Kha_nam (2021-04-09 03:37:43+00:00): Hi blairyang
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 34714574
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102599729
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102456451
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:01:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104395642 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 11:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103409187 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-16 12:39:44+00:00): Hello,
India and Pakistan, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/304716 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/307573 , now seem to be admin_level=4?  I'm guessing that was a copy-and-paste faux-pas?
Best Regards,
Andy
Oberaffe (2021-04-16 13:16:00+00:00): Dear Andy,

i tried to repair the border, maybe I made an misstake. The problem was, that somebody deleted all points on the border line. Maybe I made an copy and past error. Please repair it for me!

Best Regard
SomeoneElse (2021-04-16 20:23:26+00:00): Thanks - I'll have a look.  I can change the admin level back, but from looking at http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=304716 (India) and http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=307573 (Pakistan) its a bit difficult to see what you were fixing.  You said " somebody deleted all points on the border line" - can you give an example of nodes that were affected?
Best Regards,
Andy
Oberaffe (2021-04-16 20:32:33+00:00): I am not 100% sure whar happend, but somebode deletet or modified the border be
tween india and pakistan  in this area.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102456621#map=10/35.3314/77.3026

I tried to revert the changeset. If you zoom in you can see the damged border in the old tiles.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-16 21:45:33+00:00): OK, I can see the problem, but I'm not yet sure when it was introduced.  India https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/16eP and Pakistan https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/16eQ from March show the gap.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-16 23:33:39+00:00): OK, all sorted, I think.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101460429 for details.
ash_win (2021-04-09 09:52:54+00:00): Hi yinongsong,
Aligned residential road as it was crossing over other highway and it was fixed by Adiatma IRM-RV,kindly check with node 4264543395
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102551628
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102456747
Kha_nam (2021-04-09 03:34:06+00:00): Hi kittychou 
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 902933072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102599537
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102456768
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-31 13:22:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108943189 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. Some of these buildings are just cookie-cutter pasted with no match to imagery.
ash_win (2021-04-09 09:34:33+00:00): Hi linannie,
Aligned the residential road as per ground truth as it was crossing over other highway,kindly check with way 840365979,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102628554
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102457112
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Syborg_ (2021-04-07 07:34:34+00:00): Buon giorno, è d avvero così l'edificio di quel negozio?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-22 10:53:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105127795 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-21 02:10:06+00:00): 请临朐的编辑者不要随便拆分青州的边界线段，这个边界是特意和已有的任何图征都不交叠不共用的如果你添加的是临朐的街道之间的界线，请按照规范标记，如果是代表河流中线，就把弥河截了接上去直接写一个行政界限， 又不说明是什么的界限，是什么意思？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102457452
Kha_nam (2021-04-16 09:12:49+00:00): Hi Lintungmu
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road ,Kindly check with ways 29100822,106607718,29172522,29100992
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102561085
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102457701
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 22:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103366307 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
trigpoint (2021-04-07 12:23:04+00:00): Bore da
Croisi Y OSM, place=village is a very strange way to tag houses and gardens. Please take care to capture what is actually visible on imagery.

Diolch Phil
brianboru (2021-04-08 18:02:16+00:00): If they're not appropriatey tagged and aligned within a couple of days I propose deleting them
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 22:27:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103366307 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
TheSwavu (2021-04-07 22:14:34+00:00): Hi,

Post codes only need to be mapped once. In this area they are mapped using postal_code boundaries (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/15SH).

Thanks.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-04-07 22:22:43+00:00): Fair enough, didn't see that one. I guess there's no standard consensus because the rest of NSW is mapped on suburb boundaries.
ash_win (2021-04-09 09:15:14+00:00): Hi yusing,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road.Kindly check with way 927048261
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102626768
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102458982
ivanbranco (2022-01-01 01:32:41+00:00): Hi Visaman,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8601635602

this place value is invalid, can you check it out please?
ivanbranco (2022-01-07 20:24:09+00:00): Hi Visaman, you're active since you posted 8 new changeset after this comment, maybe you just forgot to reply

could you check that link out please?
alga (2021-04-19 17:43:51+00:00): Why did you restore the storage tanks that have been torn down?
alga (2021-04-19 17:50:01+00:00): The tanks have been torn down about a year ago, here's a photo from a month ago. https://i.imgur.com/yJbMZlA.jpg
ygcgjp5 (2021-04-20 11:22:01+00:00): I'd recommend tagging demolished features with a lifecycle prefix (at least until imagery gets updated) to tell mappers that the situation on the ground no longer reflects imagery.
alga (2021-04-20 13:07:00+00:00): I'd recommend not assuming that huge structures missing in a well-mapped area is an oversight. (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
Diana IRM-ED (2022-12-27 09:01:43+00:00): Hi jychang_m, your edit looks awesome. 
I'd like to inform that I found this highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/927050660) has crossing issue with the waterbody. Is the highway that you made based on local knowledge?
If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
Thank you
ash_win (2021-04-09 08:43:36+00:00): Hi SHIBUYAYU_M,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road.Kindly check with way 428480980
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102623733
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102459459
BCNorwich (2021-04-10 13:38:06+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've got several problems with the mapping of buildings in this changeset as noted above. The mapping is also not very neat, to say the least. The imagery is very good so if you zoom in the buildings can be very accurately drawn. It also looks like you haven't much idea about how to discern individual houses in a terrace.

Could you please correct the problems or revert changes?

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 14:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108162003 where the changeset comment is: While tidying up some poor-quality edits reported by HOT, I also spotted these that it's easier to start from scratch with in Chad.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 23:31:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103298014, 103298513 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
opendcc (2021-04-07 09:32:53+00:00): Willkommen im LK Mühldorf :-)
timmito (2021-04-07 09:37:23+00:00): Danke :-)
rms_TSCH (2021-04-07 09:40:55+00:00): Danke :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 00:15:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103121007 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted about their edits but problems still persist.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 14:17:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108162003 where the changeset comment is: While tidying up some poor-quality edits reported by HOT, I also spotted these that it's easier to start from scratch with in Chad.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 14:17:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108162003 where the changeset comment is: While tidying up some poor-quality edits reported by HOT, I also spotted these that it's easier to start from scratch with in Chad.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 14:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108162003 where the changeset comment is: While tidying up some poor-quality edits reported by HOT, I also spotted these that it's easier to start from scratch with in Chad.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 14:17:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108162003 where the changeset comment is: While tidying up some poor-quality edits reported by HOT, I also spotted these that it's easier to start from scratch with in Chad.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 14:17:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108162003 where the changeset comment is: While tidying up some poor-quality edits reported by HOT, I also spotted these that it's easier to start from scratch with in Chad.
eggie (2021-04-07 08:53:30+00:00): reverted due to vandalism by changeset  #102464660
marczoutendijk (2021-04-07 10:59:44+00:00): Geblokkeerd:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4883
H@mlet (2021-04-09 13:12:27+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre contribution, mais il y a de nombreux problèmes dans la façon dont vous l'avez faite.
Par exemple, le chemin 262216448, que vous avez nommé "Place de la Gare" va jusqu'au carrefour suivant, dans la campagne ! Il faut couper les chemins afin que le nouveau tag ne s'applique que sur la partie pertinente.
D'autre part, sur OSM, contrairement à GMaps, nous ne nommons pas les routes en copiant les noms de lieux-dits. On fait soit un nœud (point), avec les tags place=hamlet et name=, soit une emprise de l'ensemble du village, avec les mêmes tags plus landuse=residential.
En effet avec votre méthode, on ne sait pas où est Le Godreho... Et la route (dans la campagne) s'appelle bien "Chemin Rural de Cartudo" sur le cadastre.
D'après BANO, près de l'avenue de la Gare, elle s'appelle "Rue des Cerisiers".
De ce fait Plestrégouët était déjà correctement cartographié.
Je vous laisse corriger vos modifications.
Je reste  à votre dispositions pour plus de conseils.
Cordialement.
aj31 (2021-04-20 07:07:30+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai effectivement copié Google Maps pour corriger un signalement d'erreur par un utilisateur du produit que je développe pour le boulot. Il ne trouvait pas le Godreho. Je ne suis pas du coin donc je ne pourrais pas vérifier les informations. Je vais essayer d'annuler les changements.
Merci de votre aide.
H@mlet (2021-04-20 12:32:24+00:00): Bonjour,
il est strictement interdit d'utiliser Google Maps pour cartographier dans OSM, au risque d'attirer des ennuis pour tous les utilisateurs.
Pour les adresses, la source la plus fiable en France est la BANO, issue d'un accord entre La Poste, IGN et OSM France.
Vous pouvez soit annuler les changements (procédure "changeset revert", un peu compliquée), soit les corriger (donc avant tout mettre le Godreho comme un point "village", vous pouvez regarder autour comment les lieux-dits sont gérés, puis remettre les noms des voies à leur valeurs d'origine, en consultant l'historique de chaque voie).
Je peux le faire si ça vous paraît compliqué.
Je vous invite à communiquer sur les spécificités d'OSM à votre boulot. En effet le principe est de créer une base de données géographique libre, notamment de tout copyright. De ce fait il est strictement impossible de copier depuis d'autres sources sans autorisations explicites. Il en y a de plus en plus, notamment en France, même l'IGN permet l'usage de certaines données (mais pas toutes).
D'autre part il est important de respecter les conventions de cartographie du projet, afin que les données soient utilisables par le plus grand nombre.
Vous trouverez toutes ces informations sur le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France
Cordialement.
H@mlet (2021-04-20 12:43:01+00:00): Je vois que vous avez déjà fait les corrections, merci beaucoup !
Je me permets d'ajouter Le Godreho comme hameau, car le panneau est toujours sur place.
Je vais aussi ajouter quelques rues qui manquent dans le hameau.
Cordialement.