piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2016-06-25 19:03:03+00:00): Hallo Verkehrsrot,

hast du hier absichtlich ein halbfertiges Tagging hinterlassen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3964552110

Viele Grüße

Michael (mappt gerade Signale auf der Ringbahn)
Verkehrsrot (2016-06-26 11:36:37+00:00): Nein. Korrigiert.
Eugene Schava (2016-01-25 09:15:23+00:00): А почему откачены?
zaharchenkoyurka (2016-01-25 10:30:45+00:00): оказалось что они проголосовали только за проект, есть еще будут вноситься предложения по названиям. мало того, еще и некоторые названия в опубликованном проекте отличаются от того что было у меня. так что жду пока опубликуют официально. https://vk.com/wall-58339690_3114
vojtechzaboril (2022-02-03 11:30:44+00:00): Dobrý den,
je vhodné značit cesty na parkovišti jako toll=yes? toll se dle wiki používá pouze pro mýto. Tady by nejspíš stačilo fee=yes (klidně asi jen na parkovišti)
V
Jezevec (2022-02-03 14:23:47+00:00): Asi stacilo ... ten chageset kterej komentujes je 6 let starej.
vojtechzaboril (2022-02-03 14:30:17+00:00): Vím, že je to 6 let starý. Chtěl jsem se zeptat, jestli k tomu třeba nebyl nějaký důvod to takto značit? Opravím to.
Jezevec (2022-02-04 11:41:32+00:00): Ok, jak to vzniklo tezko rict, taguju takhle zmeny kdyz opravuju technicky bugy nebo hlaseni v notes.
Bjørn Nielsen (2016-01-24 17:38:37+00:00): Moving up one layer did not make the building visible. Any suggestions to what the problem might be?
Hjart (2016-01-24 18:59:55+00:00): Jeg tror der er tale om et specialtilfælde med den her pedestrian polygon som bygningerne ligger i. Jeg prøver lige at lave den om til en multipolygon.
Hjart (2016-01-24 19:24:55+00:00): Og det ser sørme ud til at virke :-)
Bjørn Nielsen (2016-01-24 21:26:16+00:00): Awesome! Takker..
sashazykov (2016-01-25 18:51:44+00:00): он уже был http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4171300
AlRight (2016-01-26 06:27:12+00:00): виноват, погорячился)
Удалю
sashazykov (2016-01-26 06:34:57+00:00): я написал небольшой скрипт, который генерит список маршрутов в Перми с ссылками на релейшены https://github.com/alexandrz/gortrans
sashazykov (2016-01-26 06:39:10+00:00): там удобно отслеживать изменения по коммитам https://github.com/alexandrz/gortrans/commits/master он только сам не обновляется
Hjart (2016-01-24 19:06:53+00:00): Ligger den i kælderen under pladsen?
Bjørn Nielsen (2016-01-24 21:20:56+00:00): Ja, de bruger en del af parkeringskælderen som værksted. Jeg kænder ikke til kælderens størrelse og udformning, men den er på min to-do-liste.
Hjart (2016-01-24 21:28:01+00:00): Ok, det kunne måske være en ide at tilføje en note om det. Ellers ser det jo mystisk ud at der ligger et usynligt mekanikerværksted midt på pladsen her.
Bjørn Nielsen (2016-01-24 21:49:20+00:00): Fair enough, det er hermed noteret. Jeg tænker at 'location=underground' må være korrekt i dette tilfælde.
Hjart (2016-01-24 21:58:00+00:00): Lyder ikke helt dumt. Du har måske bemærket at jeg har tegnet nedkørslen til kælderen på.
maraf24 (2016-01-24 21:33:51+00:00): Hej
Chyba nie kopiujesz adresów na obrysy ręcznie? 
Chyba jednak tak, sądzać po literówce w nazwie klucze addre:place zamiast addr:place.
Poza tym nie przenosisz informacji o źródle adresu (source:addr).
Używaj funkcji scalania w edytorze - scalasz punkt adresowy z obrysem, tagi same się przenoszą a punkt znika.
Migdał (2016-01-24 22:56:36+00:00): Hej,
Rzeczywiście, do tej pory robiłem to ręcznie. Szukałem informacji o scalaniu punktów do obszarów ale widocznie zbyt szybko odpuściłem. Dzięki Tobie wpadłem dopiero na to by użyć klawisza "shift".
Dziękuję.
malenki (2016-02-02 17:23:22+00:00): Hat diese Wohnstraße innerorts mit Häusern daneben wirklich keinen Namen?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393250528
streckenkundler (2016-02-02 17:39:53+00:00): Gut das schreibst... Ich schaue zu Hause mal nach, da bin ich Sonntag lang gefahren... Ich schaue in meinen Fotos mal nach... das müsste aber der Missener Weg sein...
Sven
malenki (2016-02-02 18:26:46+00:00): Vermutlich ja. Ich bin darauf gestoßen, weil du (offenbar falsch benannten) Missener Weg weiter Westlich nach Laasower Weg umbenannt hattest und ersterer dann in der Straßenlistenauswertung fehlte¹.

Danke für die prompte Antwort. :)

¹http://regio-osm.de/listofstreets/evaluationchanges?title=Vetschau/Spreewald&country=Bundesrepublik%20Deutschland&newer_evaluation=2016-02-01%2018:47:31&older_evaluation=2016-01-31%2013:00:31
streckenkundler (2016-02-02 20:19:38+00:00): Ich hab mir das noch mal  angeschaut... 

Das Deep Diff des benachbarten Wegs ist interessant und erklärt das etwas... http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=46971887

Ich hatte erst solche falschen cycleways bearbeitet, Nachdem ich Sonntag lang gefahren bis, das dann noch weiter bearbeitet. den Weg getrennt, da das Schild DE 260 erst am Ende des Siedlungsraumes stand. Das kommt davon, wenn Wege auf Teufel komm raus als cycleway getaggt werden, ohne nachzudenken... :( und man auf der OpenCycleMap die "blauen Striche" sehen will... das bereinigen dauert lange...

Sven
Tomas Straupis (2016-01-25 07:48:13+00:00): Šiuo pakeitimu ištrinta labai daug teisingai nubraižytų objektų... Aiškinuosi, kaip teisingai atšaukti šį ir po jo ėjusius tris pakeitimus ir grąžinti anksčiau nubraižytus teisingus objektus :-( Kol neatstatysiu (gali prireikti kelių dienų) reikėtų susilaikyti nuo keitimų.
mastantis (2016-01-25 11:58:43+00:00): po jusu debesnu pelkes įvedimo ant  zemelapio dingo varneles vaga, gavau panaikinti debesnu pelke. nuo keitimu, jums prasant, susikaikysiu.
Tomas Straupis (2016-01-25 12:38:48+00:00): Jei kažkuriame viename iš daugelio žemėlapių „nesimato“ kažkokie duomenys - reikia spręsti problemą su žemėlapiu, duomenų keisti (ir tuo labiau trinti) nereikėtų. Dabar buvo panaikinta ne tik pelkė, bet ir miškai, gyvenamosios/sodų zonos ir pan.
Tomas Straupis (2016-01-25 12:56:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36795679.
Tomas Straupis (2016-01-25 12:54:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36795679.
literan (2016-01-25 13:07:31+00:00): node without meaning tags - will be reverted
mavl (2016-01-25 17:57:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение данных OpenStreetMap. Вы называете улицы немного не так, как это принято в сообществе. Об этом можно почитать по адресу http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
Tomas Straupis (2016-01-25 12:53:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36795679.
waldhans (2016-01-24 18:56:34+00:00): Danke mal für die Änderung, die meisten footway's in der Gegend sind wahrscheinlich falsch.  Auf den Radrouten haben wir das korrigiert.

Nur als Anregung: korrekt ist dieses tagging:

highway=path
foot=designated
bicycle=designated
segregated=no (bei Zeichen 240)

mfg Kurt

P.S: warst du schon mal beim Stammtisch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Niederrhein/Viersen/Stammtisch ?
conti72 (2016-01-24 19:00:32+00:00): Danke Kurt für die Infos. 
Stammtisch werde ich wahrscheinlich mal im März schaffen. Wollte eigentlich schon immer mal dort hin. Nutze zwar sehr viel OSM fürs Radfahren und Geocachen, habe aber bisher nichts zurückgegeben :-)
Jan
Graf Westerholt (2017-01-22 07:34:51+00:00): Da der Altmarkt bereits als Fläche eingetragen ist (war er schon bevor du ihn als Punkt eingetragen hast) werde ich den Punkt entfernen.
reneman (2016-01-25 19:32:16+00:00): Danke :)
arvdk (2017-12-21 10:04:43+00:00): Hi Sargasso,
'bike'? Unfortunately, I do not understand by this single word what you have changed. In the history, I can see that you have added an acces restriction for motor vehicles, but I cannot find your source. Is it still accurate? See this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1219576
your changes: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=36782812
sargasso (2017-12-21 13:16:29+00:00): Hello,

No, I wanted to add restriction for bicycles and pedestrians only. But yes, I can see that for one short strech of the road I added restriction for motor vehicles also. That is not true. I've fixed the issue.
My source is experience, I know the place very well. I captured the restrictions according to road signs.
smaprs (2016-01-25 00:33:03+00:00): Too wide editions. They overlap history of local editions all over the world.
5m4u9 (2016-01-29 05:47:23+00:00): todo bien con tus ediciones, pero si quitas que el puente tiene doble sentido (o lo mismo que no tiene sentido único) dejarás a los programas de dirección de trafico imposibilitados de hacer conexiones....

restaurando sentido en calle.
FredrikLindseth (2016-01-25 18:37:06+00:00): I added the coastline back again. The validator complained about disconnected coastline and wouldnt let me upload.
malenki (2016-01-25 18:44:39+00:00): Die von dir gelöschte und ohne Namen neu eingetragene Wohnstraße habe ich wiederhergestellt:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36802571

Ich werde nie begreifen, wieso Mapper löschen und neu malen…
Fa7C0N (2017-03-28 09:07:27+00:00): hello beweta,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393275341 I found this way marked as 'landuse=reservoir" in SF. According to the history page "https://legionofhonor.famsf.org/about/history-legion-honor" the glass pyramid sits atop the Rosekrans Court and special exhibition galleries located below. So can you please verify this edit and fix it.

Thank you
Fa7C0N
5m4u9 (2016-01-25 02:07:55+00:00): Gracias por continuar añadiendo datos al mapa.

No es necesario añadir el tipo de negocio en el nombre, será añadido en las aplicaciones automáticamente.

También aparte del nombre puedes añadir horario de servicio, contactos..
BeKri (2017-02-09 20:10:57+00:00): Servus Christoph,
in Deinem CS gibt's eine kleine Namenverschiedenheit:
die Gebäude hast Du alle mit Yorkstraße getaggt, die Straße aber mit Yorck-Straße.
Welche Schreibweise stimmt jetzt ? (ich tippe eher Yorkstraße)
Gruss derBeKri
Christoph Grütter (2017-02-10 18:19:38+00:00): Korrektur erledigt!
Marych_ (2016-01-25 05:04:55+00:00): Можете точный адрес студии указать?
Hjart (2016-01-25 08:22:49+00:00): What kind of imagery did you use here? 
also when editing in Denmark, please do not join landuse (forest polygons etc) and roads
mtbbiker99 (2016-03-09 19:55:57+00:00): Why not? Everything is ok!

I can not understand your problem.
Hjart (2016-03-09 20:04:51+00:00): I have seen some very unfortunate damage happening to roads because of landuse sharing nodes with roads. I very much prefer that this is avoided, so at least when editing in Denmark please keep landuse separate from roads.
Hjart (2016-03-09 20:19:53+00:00): Are you seeing my comments only now.? Don't you read your mail?
DaveF (2016-01-25 00:57:17+00:00): Hi Richard
Have the lines down Merchant's Way been newly uncovered?

Has there been some major work on the dockside?
Richard Symonds (2016-01-25 18:02:21+00:00): My photos from a few years ago show the rails as uncovered (albeit in poor repair). I'm doing this from photographs, though, not on the ground, so feel free to revert if you have better information.
wille (2016-01-25 01:27:31+00:00): oi, Daniel

Mais uma pequena correção. a tag natural=coastline só deve ser utilizada em ilhas marítimas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline

Já fiz a correção também!
Daniel de Góes Nepomuceno (2016-01-25 11:08:40+00:00): Wile, obrigado. Tenho apanhado de ilhas. Há algum vídeo no Youtube ensinando a criar no JOSM? Eu entendi perfeitamente a questão da linha eu ainda me perco no criar relação. Obrigado.
GerdP (2016-01-25 07:43:03+00:00): Hi there!
You used highway="Impasse des Bernards"
here, I've changed that to highway=service + service=driveway + name="Impasse des Bernards"
See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393285972
Bing doesn't show a way there, so I am not sure if I got that right.
Robert Whittaker (2016-02-04 09:00:34+00:00): Is this building http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33584728 actually used as a 'school'? If not then it probably shouldn't be tagged as amenity=school.

Also, I think the Edubase URNs should only be added to the actual location of each individual institution -- just because this location is the forwarding address, it doesn't make it the schools.
RAC_UK (2016-02-04 17:44:44+00:00): This is the address on Edubase, I'll remove the tags. Is it possible to remove the 15 schools that are wrongly addressed as here from the comparison?
Robert Whittaker (2016-02-04 17:47:43+00:00): Not easily, but if you can find the correct locations for them and there's an OSM way or relation that can be tagged with the Edubase URN, then they'll show as matched next time the data is refreshed.
RAC_UK (2016-02-04 18:02:22+00:00): The 'Schools' will be houses rather that normal schools so they will have to remain missing.
Robert Whittaker (2016-02-04 18:03:49+00:00): One thing that I might be able to do is to have a list of postcode corrections to apply to the official data. So if you can find the right postcodes for the individual schools, I could look at implementing that. Then they won't all show under NN.
wille (2016-01-25 01:03:32+00:00): oi, Daniel

Quando um local não tiver nome, não é necessário colocar algo como "Ilha", como você fez nesse changeset. Já fiz a correção! :)
Daniel de Góes Nepomuceno (2016-01-25 11:08:58+00:00): Valeu, obrigado.
reneman (2016-01-25 19:24:46+00:00): Hallo Tobias, die hier bearbeiteten Objekte wurden zuletzt 2012 editiert und haben demzufolge durch die Datenspende keine Veränderung erfahren ;o)
Aber tut ja keinem weh... Gruß René
marcioaguiar (2016-01-28 18:10:26+00:00): Olá, erivanio!

Valeu pelas contribuições. Uma dica: não precisa colocar o nome da cidade na rodovia, como no caso de "Rodovia General Sampaio - Apuiarés". Os aplicativos de navegação e de consulta se encarregam de anexar o nome da cidade à  rua quando necessário.

Abraço
marcioaguiar (2016-01-28 18:13:06+00:00): Outra coisa, quando a estrada não tem nome, mas só uma referência estatual/federal como no caso da CE-235, não precisa colocar no campo "nome", só no campo "ref". O mapa e outros aplicativos entenderão o campo "ref" como o identificador da via nesses casos.
freeExec (2016-01-25 09:42:29+00:00): Откат
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
axelr (2016-01-26 05:03:21+00:00): see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Stations_.2F_Stops
railway=station only as node
freeExec (2016-01-26 13:23:22+00:00): Ok, but tags scheme public_transport not need to move to a node.
axelr (2016-01-26 23:53:28+00:00): Often we have both: The way as railway. And the vehicle to transport people as public_transport.
Nakaner (2016-02-04 16:45:09+00:00): Dear freeExec,

It is not correct and right to map railway stations as ways. There are multiple definitions about the extend of a railway station. While passengers say that it is the area formed by the platforms and the building, railway staff says that it is even more (parallel freight tracks etc.).

Mapping stations as nodes is a compromise to satisfy both people mapping the passenger perspective and railway staff/fan perspective. Railway fans/staff can add a operation site relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Operating_Site_.28Relation.29) and public transport mappers can add a polygon with public_transport=station or can create a stop area relation (type=public_transport, public_transport=stop_area). Data users can decided which perspective they want to follow and calculate an convex hull around the members of stop area relations (Transport Map already does some fancy stuff like that).

Каргаполье (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282744496) is wrong because there is building=train_station to tag station buildings and because the railway station is much larger than the building footprint.

I hereby ask you, freeExec, to revert your revert and discuss such modifications in advance. Just reverting someone else's work is not friendly and not welcomed if (happened in this case) you remove someone's correct data (you removed railway=stop from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/286108552/history – this is not correct).

Best regards

Michael
(railway mapper and co-developer of OpenRailwayMap)
freeExec (2016-02-05 21:37:17+00:00): Returned. But now in the railway=station no more sense than the label on mapnik
naoliv (2016-01-25 10:01:29+00:00): djoca, qual erro de roteamento você viu aqui?
Você apenas moveu um nó de lugar.
MarvinMep (2016-01-25 10:47:47+00:00): Me empolguei um pouco nas edições ontem e terminei meio tarde. Deixa eu explicar as fontes melhor. Do IPP, apenas peguei alguns nomes de ruas (em geral mantive os que já estavam no OSM, exceto quando havia algum grande conflito com o que o IPP informa ou com o que conheço). Os alinhamentos das ruas alguns fiz de lembrança e com fotos georreferenciadas e outros me guiando pela ortofoto da Prefeitura. De uma maneira geral, conheço bem a parte à oeste da Rua Augusto Borborema. A parte mais pra próximo da Antônio Austregésilo, me guiei mais pela ortofoto (embora conheça e também tenha material sobre algumas partes).
Também corrigi a posição da UPP.
Alkmaarder (2016-01-25 03:53:17+00:00): Construction = yes
Waarom staat het niet als "under construction"?
Jan Westerhof (2016-01-25 13:21:33+00:00): Ik geloof dat wat nog in aanleg is, getagd moet worden als 'highway=construction', samen met 'construction=secondary/cycleway/etc.'
Alkmaarder (2016-01-26 02:32:15+00:00): dank je.
Alkmaarder (2016-01-26 02:49:56+00:00): Aangepast.
Jan Westerhof (2016-01-26 08:02:46+00:00): Prima!
Ik heb nog de namen 'Fietspad' en 'Ventweg' verwijderd. Het name=* veld is alleen bedoeld voor echte eigennamen van wegen (en andere objecten).
Chris Fleming (2016-01-25 11:48:50+00:00): One of the changes in this changeset is taking Dean Village from a suburb to a village. The normal convertion for Villages that have been absorbed into the city is to have them as suburbs - see Village/Suburb definitions: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
PlaneMad (2016-01-26 13:30:01+00:00): Wow, are you traveling here? I traced some more details, please check.
Ashvini Kumar (2016-01-26 13:57:24+00:00): Yes, traveling :-)
Thanks, added few more details..
OddlyAngled (2025-01-02 22:57:44+00:00): the milestone markers like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3964747022 seem to be out of place. are they correctly located and still relevant?
shaikh solaiman (2019-10-03 05:22:29+00:00): Hi, your modify makes messes. please do not modify address line with knowing proper address line and osm rules.

Regards Solaiman
chillly (2016-01-26 18:09:19+00:00): Has Gassco released this data as open data? Where can I look at this open data?
GerdP (2016-01-26 08:09:56+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you mapped a road with
highway=main_road. This is very unusual, 
I've changed it to highway=residential.
The old value unclassified was indeed wrong. See this wiki for more info:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
You have also mapped 
addr:street=Albert Street
for this cinema:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393316821
I did not find a road with that name, please add it or correct the address. 
The cinema should also be tagged with 
amenity=cinema, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcinema
RSergei (2016-02-29 06:21:28+00:00): Зачем сносить ref=?
Geogast (2016-06-16 16:10:40+00:00): „Grundschule Pennigbüttel - kein ÖPNV“ geht gar nicht. „kein ÖPNV“ darf nur in einen description-Tag. Aber die Schule HEIẞT ja nicht so!
ramyaragupathy (2016-01-25 08:24:32+00:00): Incorrectly mentioned TIGER data as a source. And this changeset is focused on adding missing roads.
Geogast (2016-06-16 17:12:19+00:00): Wissen Sie, dass die Worte „ohne Antrag“ auf der Karte von OSM für alle sichtbar auftaucht?! Zum Namen der Schule gehört das sicher nicht!
A_rnold (2016-01-25 16:11:07+00:00): must be removed. Was a mistake.
pfg21 (2016-01-25 10:50:11+00:00): where do you get the values for uic_name ??

uic_name="Ost.Punkt 5717 km"
in my opinion a very bad for pronunciation.
freeExec (2016-01-25 11:14:26+00:00): Если я не ошибаюсь в пользователе, то до этого другой умелец брал данные из яндекс.транспорт, который мапит названия станций из маршрутов РЖД на свои карты. Так что я бы их посносил, особенно с учетом обманом - "knowledge"
axelr (2016-01-26 04:33:33+00:00): I got the value for uic_name from http://www.michaeldittrich.de/ibnr/online.php
I agree it is a bad pronunciation, but it is the way to find a station in rail-database.
Geogast (2016-06-16 17:12:47+00:00): Wissen Sie, dass die Worte „ohne Antrag“ auf der Karte von OSM für alle sichtbar auftaucht?! Zum Namen der Schule gehört das sicher nicht!
zvbn (2016-06-17 08:30:28+00:00): Hallo Geogast,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Hier hat unser Dienstleister leider sehr stumpf Daten aus Listen übernommen. Ich habe dies korrigiert und bitte um Entschuldigung.

Tim
Hjart (2016-01-25 10:16:56+00:00): Again, when editing in Denmark, please do not join landuse (wood etc.) and roads.
Geogast (2016-06-16 17:12:35+00:00): Wissen Sie, dass die Worte „ohne Antrag“ auf der Karte von OSM für alle sichtbar auftaucht?! Zum Namen der Schule gehört das sicher nicht!
Nakaner (2016-02-04 16:54:22+00:00): see my comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36787285
ajithkarunaratne (2016-01-30 15:12:53+00:00): Dear Friend,

please kindly join Sri Lanka OSm editor's forum where you would meet a lot of experienced editors and get the shared knowledge.

http://lkosm.freeforums.net/

Thanks.

Ajith
Josef73 (2022-06-24 18:10:10+00:00): Hello, is here on Friday open or not?
arafin (2024-02-17 17:03:53+00:00): I have no information about that . but most of the time the pharmacy is opened on friday.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-02-17 16:24:28+00:00): Hi! You added the `opening_hours` to the Pizza Hut (here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3965636965 ). The OSM opening_hours has a strict, machine parsable format. You can use a tool like YoHours ( http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ ) draw in the hours and generate the OSM format. I did that here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46169421 ). Hope that helps.
Polarbear (2025-05-09 07:24:28+00:00): Hallo gbm1,
wir hatten gestern den OSM-Stammtisch Berlin-Brandenburg in der Tiergartenquelle. 
Wir wunderten uns über deinen Eintrag "addr:housenumber=6", obwohl die "Note" richtigerweise vermerkt, dass es keine formale Hausnummer gibt, sondern die S-Bahnbogen-Nummer. 
Zudem gibt es die richtige Bachstr. 6 ca 200 m weiter nördlich. 
Das Restaurant selbst verwendet auch keine Hausnummer 6, wie wir uns vor Ort überzeugen konnten. 
Was war die Quelle deiner Änderung?
gbm1 (2025-05-11 12:09:50+00:00): Sorry, das ist 9 Jahre her. Vielleicht habe ich am Gebäude eine Hausnr. gesehen. Wenn es nicht richtig ist, dann korrigiere es doch bitte.
didier2020 (2016-01-26 13:17:17+00:00): hi,
be carefull when you upload data , there is a lot off duplicated buildings.
(you can use validator with josm before upload, josm do the job)
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2016-07-10 12:58:24+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390779646

decimaler i fx bredder (width) skal angives med punktum og ikke komma. dvs fx "width=1.5" og ikke "width=1,5"
Hjart (2016-01-25 11:42:33+00:00): Dette er blot en detalje, men meget små øer (holme) tagges normalt place=islet http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=islet.
Hjart (2016-01-25 11:43:15+00:00): Er du iøvrigt opmærksom på http://osm.expandable.dk ?
Bjørn Nielsen (2016-01-25 12:10:57+00:00): Det var jeg ikke klar over. Jeg taggede blot som place=island fordi jeg så at andre småøer som Pebberholm, Middelgrundsfortet osv. var tagget som sådan. Men jeg kan se at du naturligvis har ret. Jeg undrer mig i øvrigt over hvorfor coastline'en renderer anderledes (mapnik) omkring Skrædderholm end andre steder, dvs. uden en lilla stiplet linje. Jeg kan desuden se at øen slet ikke figurerer i andre projekter der anvender osm data fx. opencyclemap.org