piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-08-30 05:17:54+00:00): Hi..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach

Have a look here.. 😀
You also may ask a question at the osm forum.

Up to you...
Greetz
Eggie
persimengo (2021-09-02 12:38:01+00:00): thanks Eggie, I will
Đuro Jiří (2024-01-25 18:14:35+00:00): Castello non è monumento, però l'edificio. corretto
marc__marc (2023-02-01 23:46:43+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146461945
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146461948
you set unsigned=11;167
did you mean unsigned_ref=11;167 ?
Regards,
Marc
wermak (2023-02-05 10:33:11+00:00): Yes I meant unsigned_ref. Corrected.

Thanks
marc__marc (2023-02-05 11:06:38+00:00): thanks too
ovruni (2021-08-29 03:48:06+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios nuevamente se ha modificado el nombre a uno que ya existe con el valor alt_name, además el nombre existente se encuentra indicado en el mapa del MTC. [0]
Por otra parte, se ha cambiado a place=hamlet [1] un lugar que no parece existir un número de casas que lo amerite.
Por estos motivos he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://portal.mtc.gob.pe/transportes/caminos/normas_carreteras/Mapas%20Distritales/Ayacucho/AY_050604%20CARMEN%20SALCEDO.pdf
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Dhamlet
johnarupire (2021-08-29 04:43:14+00:00): Hola Anonimovizca,
bienvenido a OSM, pásate por el grupo en telegram para resolver las dudas que puedas tener sobre el etiquetado en el mapeo de OSM. 
Saludos! nos vemos por allí.
http://t.me/osmpe
Harry Wood (2021-08-28 23:35:23+00:00): I put it as shop=art because I see some art on display in the window, but looks kind of vacant (maybe never open as a shop) 
Looks like the tourist info functions were merged with the nearby library, but I didn't tag that yet.
All needs a bit more survey/investigation
kapazao (2021-08-30 10:28:27+00:00): Buenos días, estas ediciones que has hecho con el etiquetado de exit_to son totalmente incorrectas. Deberías haber revisado bien la wiki antes de hacer este tipo de ediciones masivas.
La etiqueta destination se usa en los carriles de desvío, no en el nodo donde se separan.
Deberías revertir todos estos conjuntos de cambios.
Para corregir este etiquetado con exit_to hay que ir haciéndolo poco a poco con cada uno de los enlaces, no se puede hacer así a la ligera, sino ya lo habríamos corregido hace tiempo.
Un saludo
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110396580
kapazao (2021-08-30 10:44:05+00:00): Acabo de ver que ya te han comentado el error en otro conjunto de cambios https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110396680
Aún así es un problema grave si no reviertes, ya que algunos programas hacen uso de exit_to (aunque esté obsoleto) y hasta que no corrigieras todos los destination poniéndolos en los enlaces no sé si lo van a leer bien. Por ello se hacen estas cosas poco a poco.
Un saludo
Iván_ (2021-08-31 16:11:12+00:00): El cambio ha sido revertido
k1wi (2021-08-29 09:22:16+00:00): Hola Iván, veo que has cambiado muchos exit_to=* por destination=* en las salidas de las autopistas. Sin embargo, no lo has hecho bien. La etiqueta destination no va en el nodo motorway_junction, sino que hay que ponerla en la vía motorway_link de la salida. Hay que corregir esto.
Iván_ (2021-08-29 09:48:36+00:00): Hola, he estado actualizando en ese sentido por que vi que estaba obsoleto.
Gracias por el aviso. Lo reviso.
Iván_ (2021-08-29 09:53:16+00:00): El cambio que hay hacer consiste en quitar destination=* o destination:ref=* del nodo y poner dichos tags en la vía motorway_link de salida. Correcto?
Gracias
k1wi (2021-08-29 12:46:14+00:00): Eso es.

Puedes usar si quieres la web  CheckAutopista para comprobar las salidas de las autopistas 

https://github.com/k1wiosm/checkautopista2
Iván_ (2021-08-31 16:10:56+00:00): El cambio ha sido revertido
Moldovan_Merkator (2021-09-09 16:45:37+00:00): Nu este corect atribuirea tagului tunnel=yes asupra acestor două porțiuni, conform OSM, drept tunel este considerat acea construcție rutieră, pedestriană sau acvatică care se află sub pămînt, clădire sau vreun obiect care astupă acest drum. În cazul dat drumul acesta nu este sub pămînt ci este mai mult denivelat.
Slavut (2021-09-09 19:46:00+00:00): Vă mulțumesc pentru sfat!
bkil (2022-01-05 20:45:31+00:00): Pontosan mi volt ennek a forrása? Mapillary alapján itt például van kuka: http://osm.org/node/3465203083
Kiss_Karoly (2022-01-05 21:08:18+00:00): Igen igazad van. Rengetegszer jártam arra, azt hittem jól emlékszem. A "dohányboltos" előtti meetingen rákérdeztem a helyközi autóbuszvonalakra. A javasoltaknak megfelelően átdolgozom az eddig felvitteket. Ennek során lesz javítanivalóm a megállókon is. Újragondolom, ahol nem vagyok biztos magamban, ott ki fogom törölni ezeket az infókat. Emiatt nem fogom böngészni a Mapillaryt.
bkil (2022-01-05 22:59:47+00:00): Ne haragudj, nem feltétlenül azt jelenti, hogy nincs igazad, mivel ezek a fotók lehetnek régiek is, és időközben átalakíthatták a megállókat. Helyiként neked jobban kell tudnod, így távolról nem akarom elrontani. Csak gondoltam rákérdezek, hogyha valami konkrét weboldalról volt ez a része akkor én is ellenőriztem volna.
GOwin (2021-10-01 02:24:45+00:00): Thanks for keeping the features up-to-date in San Carlos City.

I hope we can count on your help for the #OSMaPaaralan project, to locate the schools volunteers failed to verify in San Carlos: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges?challengeSearch=123.16326141357423%2C10.43919552993234%2C123.58795166015626%2C10.674440919290118&keywords=osmapaaralan&location=intersectingMapBounds
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-09 06:42:24+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3306183 ?
MR-300 (2022-08-10 18:04:25+00:00): Zerknąłem i dodałem komentarz.
Kha_nam (2021-08-30 10:24:31+00:00): Hi mdizon
fixed the building polygons as it is connected with the residential way kindly refer https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Kha_nam
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110397552
adrianojbr (2021-08-29 17:48:29+00:00): Parabéns para o trabalho em Correia Pinto. Está muito bom! Abraço!
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-14 17:24:00+00:00): FYI Most (~80%) "congregational" churches in CT, such as way 206954336, can be tagged as united_church_of_christ (UCC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Church_of_Christ#History
Mashin (2022-08-14 21:38:23+00:00): Nice. Thanks for the info!
Kovoschiz (2021-08-29 10:39:54+00:00): Please put labels in `description:en=` and `description:zh=`, not `name=`.
Superhollando (2021-08-30 03:12:49+00:00): I appreciated the changesets made
tekim (2021-08-29 18:26:27+00:00): Thanks for continuing to edit OpenStreetMap. I am not sure what is going on, but many of the buildings you are creating are still not showing up with square corners. Perhaps try zooming in closer when you are drawing the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110399089
PikaPutter1235 (2021-09-10 03:41:14+00:00): I’m sorry I did this when I had a lot of free time, and it appeared to be straight, but now it doesn’t. I am currently very busy, and will be fixing all the corners when I can. (Just thought K should reply and let you know I am not ignoring feedback) thanks!
aharvey (2025-02-09 04:16:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162301234 due to use of proprietary data.
felipeeugenio (2021-08-29 12:09:51+00:00): Camilo, por favor no ponerle parque a cualquier metro cuadrado de pasto. Ya hemos conversado esto.

además por favor no pegar los parque a las calles. cuesta mucho repararlo.

saludos y gracias por tus ediciones
karson_ (2021-09-25 20:22:04+00:00): Why did you downgrade a bunch of bike paths from highway=cycleway to highway=footway?
archpdx (2021-09-26 03:05:00+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. After reviewing the imagery and existing width tags on some of these, the paths do seem to be wider than other sidewalks in the area such as near Fleet Farm. This was a mistake on my part.

I added foot=designated and segregated=no to these cycleways and changed ways that were missed back to cycleway. 

I appreciate you taking the time to fix my mistakes along Grand Prairie.
marc__marc (2023-05-29 23:15:49+00:00): Hello,
what's the meaning of license=Jose.P.K ?
Regards,
Marc
pitscheplatsch (2021-08-29 06:13:23+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110400217

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
marc__marc (2023-05-29 23:17:01+00:00): Hello,
what's the meaning of license ?
Regards,
Marc
Hungerburg (2021-08-29 22:04:03+00:00): Gut erkannt, ich frag mich wie? Gern gesehen jedenfalls.
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-21 16:34:08+00:00): Hi Hungerburg, ich nutze zur Erkennung verschiedene Tools von mir. Sicherlich sind "Find Suspicious OpenStreetMap Changesets" und "Latest OpenStreetMap Edits per Tile" die beiden schnellsten ...

Viele Grüße
mueschel (2021-08-30 17:34:47+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits. There are many tags with spelling mistakes, e.g. 
heath_level instead of health_level
boopington (2021-08-30 00:50:44+00:00): I dont know what imagery you are using but maxar and esri clearly show this nursery no longer exists.
Dr Kludge (2022-02-28 15:14:48+00:00): You spent more time writing on my changest verses your changeset 103873029:  "removal".  You did the same thing across the nation.  How am I supposed to understand that you are not being malicious?  It would have been much better to say I consulted x imagery as the nursery has been replace by a new subdivision on x/2021.   Changing the landuse tag from plant_nursery to residential would have been a plus.  Here is an example of what I am talking about. There is a brand new building on this corner.  I explained why I added the building in hopes that no one will delete it. 
 Also thank you for the follow up.  It is very common for areas to be repurposed.  I will fix the issue.
Dr Kludge (2022-02-28 15:15:43+00:00): Here is that corner. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1028525651#map=19/33.59638/-112.03848
boopington (2022-03-01 20:45:36+00:00): 6 months later for an honest mistake?
eggie (2021-08-29 07:38:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Wanneer een instelling of winkel is verhuisd graag volgende keer het adres intact laten.
in use=no lijkt me geen valide tag. 
Denk dat het hele watertappunt weg kan.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-29 07:46:17+00:00): Adres Blankenburgerstraat 40 hersteld.

Kijk je nog even naar je watertappunt?
Nu aangepast naar disused:amenity=drinking_water

Dan rendert het niet meer op de kaart. 

MVG
eggie
Skinoku (2021-08-30 10:15:00+00:00): Ciao Jet!
Davvero bello questo software StreetComplete.
a presto!
catdreamer (2021-08-29 12:26:12+00:00): NLSC現在可以用來當底圖了嗎?
stanchen_osm (2021-09-22 03:31:13+00:00): NLSC有提供圖磚, 不論是NLSC繪製的地圖, 還有空照圖, 等高線圖, 都可以視需要選擇用來當OSM的底圖參考.
Supaplex (2021-09-22 03:51:31+00:00): 應該只有開放資料版本的地圖可以用
如果用到其他的地圖都會有問題
stanchen_osm (2021-09-22 09:02:10+00:00): 是的. 所以只能用來參考. 基本上我只能把我去過的地方所記錄的GPS航跡與OSM地圖不一致處與NLSC空照圖對照後作微調.
eggie (2021-08-29 07:49:30+00:00): Tip... Denk je aan de straatnamen?
MVG
eggie
turepalsson (2021-08-29 09:56:55+00:00): Hm, gjorde nog egentligen ingen större nytta, såg jag sedan...
eggie (2021-08-29 07:57:14+00:00): Tip  amenity=playground ontbreekt.. Je zult dus niets zien op de kaart zo.
gr eggie
gscscnd (2021-08-29 08:35:39+00:00): Jeżeli zmieniasz <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943455184> z primary na primary_link, to powinieneś tak samo zmienić <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161293462> i <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943455183>.
eggie (2021-08-29 08:35:11+00:00): Beste Aronyx.. Alle begin is moeilijk. Dat geldt zeker voor OSM. Zoek elke keer in het begin op in de wiki hoe te mappen. Dus niet zomaar iets verzinnen.. dat doet meer kwaad dan goed. 
paid=yes is niet in OSM  Wel fee=yes
Turnlanes toevoegen doe je niet op een node. Dat werkt niet. Het is ook niet iets voor starters. 
turn_lanes verwijderd van node..

Hier wat leesvoer  .. voor de toekomst..
    Wat tips om rijstroken in te tekenen:  
    - Rijbaan: aparte way  
    - Rijstrook: dezelfde way, aangegeven met tags lanes en tags eindigend op :lanes  
    - Bij een op- of afrit is de punt van het puntstuk in principe de locatie om de way van de op- of afrit te laten beginnen.  
    - Aantal rijstroken (bijv. 3): lanes=3  
    - Voorsorteervakken: turn:lanes=left|through|through;right (een pipe | geeft de scheiding tussen rijstroken aan, een puntkomma als er meerdere waarden op een rijstrook thuishoren, zoals through;right)  
    - Uitvoegstrook: turn:lanes=none|none|slight_right of turn:lanes=||slight_right (geen tekst is gelijk aan none, maar het gebruik van none kan in dit geval duidelijker zijn)  
    - Doorgetrokken streep (bijv. tussen de midden- en rechterrijstrook): change:lanes=yes|not_right|no 

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-29 08:37:29+00:00): Lokale mappers willen graag weten wat je gebt gedaan. Geef dus  concreet aan wat je hebt gewijzigd. Some edits zegt niets...  
Ik heb fee=yes toegevoegd ipv paid.
Mapse
eggie
abakus_uploader (2021-08-29 22:32:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SekeRob (2021-08-29 08:36:02+00:00): Also, converted place area to residential and create hamlet POI, those loveable conventions, that make sense.
nw520 (2021-08-29 11:07:33+00:00): Hallo "diebasis SL".

Temporäre Veranstaltungen sind für eine Karte ungeeignet und fallen daher nicht in den Projektumfang von OpenStreetMap. Ferner grenzen einige deiner Änderungen (insbesondere das Umbenennen von Straßen zur Bewerbung einer politischen Veranstaltung) an Vandalismus. Auch das Kartieren einer Kreuzung auf der Wand eines Hauses ist nicht wünschenswert; hier gehe ich mal davon aus, dass dies ein Versehen war.

Aus diesen Gründen habe ich deine/eure drei letzten Änderungssätze revertiert und bitte freundlichst um mehr Sorgfalt bei etwaigen zukünftigen Änderungen.
Beste Grüße
dadavid (2024-08-11 12:21:43+00:00): Hi BeKri, 
gleiches hier [1]. 
Viele Grüße :) 

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2338592911
eggie (2021-08-29 10:01:58+00:00): source hoort bv te zijn local_ knowledge oid
 niet de website..

Je ziet niets omdat de aard van het bedrijf niet toegevoegd is.

Een zoektocht door de  wiki (healtcare) en anders zelf een tag verzinnen die hout snijdt.
MVG
eggie
SekeRob (2021-08-29 09:32:05+00:00): Contrada Brecciarola is a very nice way (poor quality) to cycle from 500 to over 1000 slm starting at Manoppello and then descending to Serramonacesca. Park the bike and walk to castel Manardo and Eromo Sant'Onofrio to spend a day.
PacerCZ (2021-09-02 23:00:52+00:00): Hallo. 
Sorry, aber diese Korrektur ist inakzeptabel. Es ist kein Wildpfad, sondern ein Jägerpfad und als solcher gehört in die Karte. Ich sehe kein Grund eine Realität zu verbergen trotzt ein Naturschutzgebiet, der Pfad dort ist und fertig!!!
PacerCZ (2021-09-03 00:08:40+00:00): Und noch dazu, die OSM Karte ist auch durch Rettungskräfte verwendet (z.B. Höhlenrettung), weshalb finde ich als eine Blödsinn, einen existierenden Weg  zu löschen.

Ich würde euch eher bitten, statt zu löschen die existierenden Wege, die markierten Pfads in der Umgebung von Ötscher zu korrigieren. Ich habe probiert, es irgendwie zusammenstellen, aber da ich unterschiedliche Unterlagen gefunden habe, von welchen ist nicht eindeutig, welcher Weg ist welcher (das bedeutet - welche Weg Nummer), ist die Markierung dort nicht fertig und vielleicht auch nicht ganz korrekt. Danke.
SKald (2021-10-29 15:03:29+00:00): Ich sehe das auch so. Revert?
PacerCZ (2021-10-29 16:36:07+00:00): Ich weiß nicht, ob du es wie ich siehst odet ÖTK. Auf jeden Fall, wir haben es schon mit ÖTK geklärt. Erstens, der Weg ist ein Jägerweg, zweitens ist der Weg für die (Höhlen)Rettung wichtig. Und eigentlich, drittens, es ist kein Naturschutzgebiet und die Verwaltung des Naturparks Ötscher-Tormäuer hat mir bestätigt, dass dort das Bewegung komplett frei ist. Also, wir können zwar diskutieren, ob dort normale Touristen aufgrund des Naturschutzes gehen sollten, aber das ist nicht die Sache von OSM, die sollten alles kartieren, was der Realität entspricht.
PacerCZ (2021-10-29 16:37:00+00:00): Und der gelöschte Weg habe ich wieder gestellt.
SKald (2021-10-29 17:25:50+00:00): Passt schon. Ich sehs eh so wie du. Wenn der Weg existiert, gehört er gemappt. Wenn er wiederhergestellt ist, dann ist ja alles wieder ok.
PacerCZ (2021-10-29 17:44:27+00:00): Danke!
user_5359 (2021-08-30 08:25:20+00:00): Hello! Did You know, that admin_level 2 is reserved for a country. So 1 means a greater object like a contient.Also see the difference between name and ref (for reference number). see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977502046
maraf24 (2021-08-29 14:57:56+00:00): Znów błędna kategoria.
Droga jest do lasu/wody.
user_8120638 (2021-08-29 17:16:55+00:00): Tam lasu nie ma to jest droga wewnętrzna
JLZIMMERMANN (2022-02-21 14:16:10+00:00): Hello Philipp
Thank you for adding the restaurant :-)
I have kept the tags was:*=* because these are usefull for me to keep some history of the shop.
Regards
Jean-Louis
Maria Montoriol (2021-08-31 15:38:03+00:00): No se escribe "Esparraguera (B-231)" si no Esparreguera (B-231)
jqngarcia (2021-08-31 15:40:18+00:00): Hola Maria, a quin element et refereixes?

JQN
eteb3 (2021-08-30 07:19:28+00:00): Hi Andy. I'm just discovering osmcha. I see this changeset is flagged with "invalid tag modification". You're hardly a novice user: do you know why that might be, so I can learn to weigh osmcha's comments accurately? Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110405631
mueschel (2021-09-05 13:54:27+00:00): The reason for such a warning is likely that there are 3 tags that are not common / misspelled / not used anywhere else:

conservation = yes
flood control = yes
water = intermittant
eteb3 (2021-09-05 14:11:58+00:00): Thanks.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-29 10:06:47+00:00): I make this change because of the inspire of this Pull Request in NSI on github:(https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/5283)

I think you want to type "kebab" so I do this changes, If not suitable, just revert this changeset and meke "kebap" again.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-29 10:06:42+00:00): I make this change because of the inspire of this Pull Request in NSI on github:(https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/5283)

I think you want to type "kebab" so I do this changes, If not suitable, just revert this changeset and meke "kebap" again.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-29 10:06:35+00:00): I make this change because of the inspire of this Pull Request in NSI on github:(https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/5283)

I think you want to type "kebab" so I do this changes, If not suitable, just revert this changeset and meke "kebap" again.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-29 10:06:29+00:00): I make this change because of the inspire of this Pull Request in NSI on github:(https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/pull/5283)

I think you want to type "kebab" so I do this changes, If not suitable, just revert this changeset and meke "kebap" again.
skyper (2021-11-05 18:41:51+00:00): Hello MapTheWalk
The has been a problem with JOSM adding <different> as value when changing multiple objects at once.
I have tried to fix it but I had no clue about addr:street or postcode in Singapore so I removed some keys with this value. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113421948.
Can you please, take a look at this area again.
Regards skyper
MapTheWalk (2021-11-13 10:03:29+00:00): Hi skyper,
Thanks for addressing this issue. Removing those tags is indeed the best option until someone with local knowledge can complete them.
Regards
skyper (2021-11-15 12:10:18+00:00): Thanks for the feedback.
Take care
SekeRob (2021-12-30 18:30:40+00:00): Hi,

Don't care what Keepright says or siad here... the signs at the corners of Piave, Modigliano and Po are signed as arriving at a roundabout with matching yield signs i.e. IT:D3 + IT:B1 You may check with the 02-2021 streetview imagery for verification.

cheers
sorcrosc (2021-12-31 21:24:59+00:00): I'm not sure if mapping based on a traffic sign, which is not exactly correct, is the right thing to do here.
Also, what streetview are you talking abount? I hope a very active mapper like you is aware this is not allowed:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

Lorenzo
SekeRob (2021-12-31 22:24:01+00:00): I live here and if its changed at that locations in the last 48 hours let me know.
sorcrosc (2021-12-31 23:29:20+00:00): Good to know. Sorry for not trusting you but it's kind of suspicious if you provide this as a proof.
Since you know and probably use the roundabout quite often, I'm curious about it's mapping and how it actually works. When you go through it, does the navigator give correct information?

Thanks
ualios (2022-01-01 11:37:40+00:00): Hi, SekeRob... don't even blindly trust road signs! What seen here on Streetview seems to me a little mess! In fact, those exiting the main roundabout do not know to enter another one (no sign), unlike those coming from Via Piave and Via Modigliani. On the other hand, the sign at the corner of Via Po' does not indicate the arrival at a roundabout, but the warning that a roundabout will be encountered further on. So the roundabout in question would actually be a half roundabout, since the other half ends in another roundabout thus losing the right of way. 
I've never seen such a mapping in OSM, and don't think it would be useful for navigators!
gebux (2021-08-30 07:33:11+00:00): Kein Gletscher
Bergfan (2021-08-30 17:24:55+00:00): Ja, habe ich wieder gelöscht.
eggie (2021-08-29 10:38:43+00:00): Hi VulkanMaps... All buildings are import from the Dutch Kadaster.
Be careful with deleting nodes.

Greetz,
eggie
maraf24 (2021-08-29 14:45:29+00:00): Znowu fake. Na północy jest trawnik a nie droga.
user_8120638 (2021-08-29 17:17:51+00:00): Przecież tam jest droga do gorzelni
maraf24 (2021-08-29 14:42:29+00:00): Tu nie ma budynku.
user_8120638 (2021-08-29 17:15:50+00:00): Tu są ruiny budynku i prawidłowo je oznaczyłem
marcinbittel (2021-09-02 07:42:21+00:00): Linie oznaczające trasy autobusów mają dziury, m.in.: Bus 190: CH Marki => Os. Górczewska: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9169113#map=17/52.23932/20.93689
osmviborg (2021-08-29 11:05:40+00:00): Nu er der så to områder:
1)
landuse=meadow
name=Golføen
2)
leisure=miniature_golf
name=Golf Øen
Andrea Musuruane (2021-08-29 12:29:44+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non usare le immagini aeree di Bing perché non sono ben allineate nelle nostre zone. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Per cambiare sfondo con iD, prova a guardare questo screenshot: https://imgur.com/1wjkVbr Oppure, se vuoi usare le Bing, le devi riallinearle manualmente usando la funzione "Offset delle immagini" in iD: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#iD Quelle che hai inserito non sono highway=path (sentieri) ma highway=track (strade ad uso agricolo - si vedono le due tracce delle ruote nel terreno). Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110406790