piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RubenBfeld (2022-03-11 21:27:27+00:00): Bin der Meinung die Position, die ich eingetragen habe wäre die Korrekte, werde das aber nochmal morgen oder kommende Woche überprüfen. Vom Objekt her, ist aber wohl amenity=compressed_air eigentlich das Passendere.
Fischkopp0815 (2022-03-12 13:40:49+00:00): Bei der Position liegst du wohl richtig.
Was die Frage amenity=compressed_air/bicycle_repair_station ist es wie oft bei OSM. Beides wird verwendet. Im englischen Wiki steht bei compressed_air: "Since amenity=compressed_air is usually oriented towards cars, some people prefer to map cycle pumps as a bicycle repair station with just a pump and no other services. " also auch nicht wirklich klar.
RubenBfeld (2022-03-14 22:27:57+00:00): Ja...Position ist auf jeden Fall vorne direkt am Eingang der Himmelreichstraße. Dann sind wir jetzt im Dilemma, für was wir uns hier in Heide entscheiden ;-). Optisch wäre ich ja für bicycle_repair_station, da diese auch in der "normalen" OSM-Ansicht angezeigt wird.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-11 22:15:53+00:00): Защо си изтрил вътрешните линии на горската площ? На сателитните снимки ясно се вижда че на тези места няма дървета. Същия въпрос се отнася и за промените в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118338851 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118338579.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-12 22:46:19+00:00): this path does not seem to exist. I used the Strava layer too to check, what layer did you draw with?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9569636679

https://ibb.co/qpVLJLq
user_5359 (2022-03-11 06:47:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A small hint: Since not all sources (aerial photos) are up-to-date, it is better to provide the building with a so-called lifecycle prefix instead of deleting it completely from the database.
I have modified this.
user_5359 (2022-03-12 18:46:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/784547473. What is the meaning of acceso = prohibido camiones?

¡Bienvenido a OSM! Por favor, echa un vistazo a http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/784547473. ¿Cuál es el significado de acceso = camiones prohibidos?
❤️‍🔥 (2022-03-10 22:47:21+00:00): Hi, you seem to have deleted part of the coastline (https://osm.org/way/318649956), and created a broken boundary (https://osm.org/relation/13912523)

Any objection if I undo that part of your edit?

P.S. I see you're trying to split the current boundary for "Marlborough" into two identical boundaries for the "Marlborough District" and "Marlborough Region" with the same geographic area. I'm curious to know what the benefit of this change is, since it will cause some software to add a redundant extra line to street addresses:

e.g.
12 Example Street
Riversdale
Blenheim
Marlborough
Marlborough
New Zealand
Dimitar155 (2022-03-10 22:05:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469453533 съдържа лична информация, която не трябва да бъде качвана в OpenStreetMap.
Allison P (2022-03-11 17:53:49+00:00): This is really just a sidewalk, please retag it. People using OSM know bicycles can use sidewalks unless specified otherwise. Thank you!
benovard (2022-03-12 05:47:51+00:00): It is kind of a sidewalk, but it is an extra wide sidewalk meant for bikes, and it is listed as a bike route on the city's biking network map.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-11 10:51:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4114711990/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
gscholz (2022-03-12 05:57:50+00:00): Hi JuanMelo,
this changeset has created a huge amout of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicating buildings which already have been added by changeset 118295158:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118295158#map=13/4.1190/-72.9457

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118340677

Can you please fix this? I recoment to revert this changeset.
Kind regards
Guido
user_5359 (2022-03-11 19:44:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1039193505, http://www.osm.org/way/1039193503. Did you mean incline instead of inclu?
Denis_Helfer (2022-03-12 11:20:46+00:00): of course !
 evident mistyping
PT-53 (2022-03-12 07:40:55+00:00): Hallo user567,
wenn der Feldweg nicht mehr existiert, sollte das Merkmal
tracktype=grade4
nochg elöscht oder ebenfalls auf
removed:tracktype=*
abgeändert werden.
Machst Du das noch?
Fragende Grüße

Gefunden mit keep right:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=134156774
Mapperschwob (2022-03-12 12:50:02+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich habe mich für die Variante
removed:tracktype=* 
entschieden.
PT-53 (2022-03-12 13:39:43+00:00): Hallo user567, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung und Bereinigung.
Grüße
cyton (2022-03-10 22:34:19+00:00): hm, um das bicycle=yes kann man sich streiten. 
das ist doch sicherlich privat, ist das bicycle=yes beschildert?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118341064
StefanHRT (2022-03-11 03:58:24+00:00): auf destination geändert
drivec (2022-05-11 01:17:46+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
CurlingMan13 (2023-05-13 04:34:00+00:00): Buildings can be squared using "q"
GOwin (2022-03-14 02:41:36+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your changeset added "FORESTblock" as an operator of this forest.  Have you seen the wiki for this key: https://osm.org/wiki/Operator which shows what is expected for this tag?

If you're new to OSM and keen to know more about OSM, check out https://osm.org/​wiki/​Beginners'_guide or  https://learnosm.org. 

You can also reach out to the local OSM community in several platforms:  https://osm.org/wiki/PH
drivec (2022-05-11 01:10:19+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-03-11 02:59:49+00:00): Hi, you seem to be drawing multiple lines on top of each other (see https://osm.org/way/316766082 and https://osm.org/way/1039204880). Please do not do this, OpenStreetMap uses relations for this purpose.

Perhaps you could explain what you're trying to achieve with your recent edits?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118342516
mueschel (2022-03-25 11:08:27+00:00): Hi,
could you comment on the fuel tags here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1464417504

To my knowledge Benzina s.p. is the same as octane_95
LouisXIV (2025-04-14 16:11:22+00:00): This is not how building:part should be mapped, the outline area with the building tag with all others tags is mandatory, the relation is optional and not even render by most map style. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
ChillyDL (2025-04-14 21:04:58+00:00): Right, thanks for pointing this out. I fixed it. Regards!
mariotomo (2022-07-01 19:37:26+00:00): hola. si acaso vuelves a OSM, por favor ponte en contacto con la comunidad, y pregunta cómo se mapean estas situaciones. has puesto mucho trabajo en algo demasiado detallado, y lastimosamente también incorrecto. también es mucho trabajo ahora arreglarlo. la buena voluntad que se ve en este trabajo merece recibir indicaciones y apoyo. ojalá vuelvas a mapear, ten en cuenta el sitio community.openstreetmap.org
EMREOYUN (2022-03-18 18:47:21+00:00): Merhaba, OpenStreetMap'a hoş geldiniz. Harita katkılarınız için öncelikle çok teşekkür ederiz ve ekleyebileceğiniz başka katkılarınız varsa eklemekten çekinmeyin :)
drivec (2022-05-11 01:10:12+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
maro21 (2022-09-03 18:55:40+00:00): construction:amenity=parking to jest tag główny, a budowy tam nie było.
PT-53 (2022-03-15 08:50:00+00:00): Hallo Chris,
Du hast diese Spielplatz-Fläche
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039209484/history
neu eingezeichnet. Da war bereits ein Spielplatz-Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8002979592/history
so daß der Spielplatz jetzt din OSM doppelt eingetragen ist. Das sollte nicht sein und der Knoten deshalb noch gelöscht werden.
Das Merkmal
- area=yes
ist an einer Leisure-Fläche unnötig und sollte wieder entfernt werden.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=playground?uselang=de

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Gefunden mit keep right:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=98&error=134159716
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-11 13:54:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118365134 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some allegedly fictional edits in Canada. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5762 and previous blocks .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-11 13:54:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118365134 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some allegedly fictional edits in Canada. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5762 and previous blocks .
RAC_UK (2023-01-02 14:55:53+00:00): is it possible to use the section of foot path that crosses the cricket nets or do the two footpaths cross the A509 at the gate and split again on the Stixton side?
ianc (2023-01-02 22:18:32+00:00): Assuming you mean the ones at Wollaston Cricket Club, the right of way that goes behind the nets (path TS1) leads to a gate with a Public Footpath sign to cross the A509. 

The one that cuts across the ground (path TS2) seems to point to the end of the crash barrier on the A509, but I'm not sure I would fancy crossing there and there is no signage - and what looks like a ditch (ages since I've been there so relying on Google 2021 streetview pix).

However, both are clearly marked both on North Northamptonshire's own mapping service and Ordnance Survey, so the right of way exists. TS1 and TS2 both begin at the stream, TS1 as a continuation of TV6, with TS2 of TV7 (the stream is evidently the parish boundary, V denoting Wollaston and S for Strixton).

In the aerial imagery you can clearly see both paths marked out in the crops on the Strixton side.

The Parish or Town councils should probably look into this... The logical solution is as you suggest, but that is not where the RoW run!

TL;DR Rights of Way can be odd and the Highways Agency sometimes cocks up, while parishes are sometimes a bit sleepy...

There is a similarly dangerous one in Olney.
ianc (2023-01-02 22:22:08+00:00): Additional: curiously, if you follow TV6 back to London Road, and then check on Streetview,  just north of the Pyghtle, someone seems to have mislaid the public footpath signs. Careless, that....
ianc (2023-01-02 22:27:22+00:00): Additional (additional): Have added the PRoW_refs for ease of reference.
ottwiz (2022-03-11 22:38:20+00:00): Hali! a 3-as főút relációjába belerondítottál Gödöllőnél és Hatvannál. Légyszi kerüld a körforgalmak sorrendjének átrendezését, mert az nem helyes, ha a körforgalmaknál a tagok nem egymás után vannak, az azt jelenti, hogy szakadás van a körforgalomba.
A körforgalmaknak úgy van a sorrendjük, hogy ahogy az út belemegy a körforgalomba, mint egy utas, aki át hajt rajta, megy át keresztül, ha meg kihajtottál a körforgalomból akkor odáig tart az adott forward szakasz amíg nem torkollik egy nem oneway szakaszba, és mivel ott van a visszafele út is, a forward way-sorozatnak az első pontjából akkor a másik irányból kellene megközelíteni ugyanazt a node-ot így elkerülve a szakadást. De azokat a tagokat, amiket pl egy kamion nem szokott használni mert nem megy körbe-körbe akkor azokat kihagyjuk.
(Így helyes csinálni, nézd meg majd a reláció jelenlegi változatát, a JOSM se mutat semmilyen szakadást)
user_5359 (2022-03-11 07:15:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be sparing with the tags. It is not expected that every path is a bridge or tunnel. It would be different to say whether the area is lit (key=lit). Also, no car is allowed on a footpath. I have reduced the path accordingly.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-11 13:54:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118365134 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some allegedly fictional edits in Canada. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5762 and previous blocks .
Mashin (2022-03-11 05:06:06+00:00): Please follow the community editing guidelines. Use multipolygons where needed and don't delete exiting objects.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls

Not following the guidelines will result in blocking of your account.
user_5359 (2022-03-15 07:45:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on twenty one solar panels.
I am sure that the file following keys are from your GPS device which are useless information for a solar panel.
speed = 0.0
time = 2022-02-08T11:15:39
track_fid = 0
track_seg_id = 0
track_seg_point_id = 0
Could you please delete this foreign keys?

ele = 126.361083984375 (please remove the most digits of this value)
Allison P (2023-10-31 04:28:54+00:00): Individual caravan spots like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039225898 should be tagged with tourism=camp_pitch instead
emersonveenstra (2022-03-11 11:58:25+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the additions to OSM, however I do need to point out that "sidewalk" in OSM specifically means sidewalks alongside a road (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks). The path you mapped here shouldn't have the `footway=sidewalk` tag on it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118345369
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-11 13:57:38+00:00): Some tags that may be useful in your mapping endeavours. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row
FlowerHillPerson (2022-03-11 19:52:40+00:00): Much thanks!
eggie (2022-03-11 07:45:41+00:00): fixed busroutes.../ turn:lanes
C_nav (2022-03-14 04:01:13+00:00): Hi eggie, thanks for your feedback and correcting the data. I will be careful of these edits.
eggie (2022-03-11 07:00:05+00:00): Hi C-Nav.

Did you noticed the busroutes?
They also need correction.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-03-11 07:15:13+00:00): Fixed busroute
C_nav (2022-03-14 03:58:26+00:00): Hi eggie, thanks for your feedback and correcting the data. I will be careful of these edits.
JJIglesias (2022-03-11 05:54:09+00:00): Any Value of Population Number NEEDS to be confirmed by Official Data of the INE of Bolivia. DO NOT PUBLISH FALSE INFORMATION IN THE MAP.
JJIglesias (2022-03-11 05:56:14+00:00): Dejen de cambiar la data de Villa Porvenir. NO es un TOWN, la UNICA data de Densidad de Poblacion OFICIAL es la del INE. No existen Censos Poblacionales oficiales en esa zona. Y hasta que NO exista TAL DATA OFICIAL NO se puede colocar Cantidad de Poblacion, sacada de estimaciones...
JJIglesias (2022-03-11 06:02:03+00:00): Si continuan eliminando la data de Fixme que se ha colocado y tras multiples advertencias voy a Solicitar que su Cuenta sea Bloqueada al DWG por saboteo al mapa. Les queda claro?
emersonveenstra (2022-03-11 11:49:43+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for the speed limit additions, however, you changed the `oneway` tag to `no` on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113102353. was that intentional?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118346349
michiganguy123 (2022-03-11 19:48:57+00:00): Hi. no it wasn't, must've accidently clicked it. Has been fixed.
MxxCon (2022-03-11 06:38:06+00:00): Hello.
Your changeset covers 4 continents. Please elaborate what those "misc. improvements" are?
Lee Carré (2022-03-11 11:02:38+00:00): ▪︎much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
▪︎what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mariotomo (2022-05-29 18:12:31+00:00): it would be good if the author found the time to examine their practices, because this same mistake (mixing changes in Somalia and in North America) was repeated in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120994369, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121497254, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121643213

commenting style could be improved, too. :-)
mavl (2022-05-20 15:43:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Warin61 (2022-03-20 23:39:09+00:00): Reverted owing to probable copyright issue.
eggie (2022-03-11 06:51:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Warin61 (2022-03-21 22:41:25+00:00): reverted
mueschel (2022-03-27 12:40:13+00:00): Welche Beschränkungen gelten hier genau? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35923088

"forestry" als Fahrzeugklasse gibt es in DE nicht.
Und wenn "agricultural" beschildert ist, dann wären Mopeds auch erlaubt. (in DE sind das Kraftfahrzeuge mit 25 km/h Höchstgeschwindigkeit.)
Fischkopp0815 (2022-03-27 13:26:30+00:00): Folge dem Link. Da ist ein Bild, das das Zusatzschild zeigt.

https://www.boyens-medien.de/artikel/lokales/hochbruecke-fuer-trecker-freigegeben-381868.html
mueschel (2022-03-27 13:38:33+00:00): Das wäre
vehicle:conditional = yes @ (agricultural and maxspeed >= 40); yes @ (forestry and maxspeed >= 40)
traffic_sign = "Land- und forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr ab 40 km/h bbH frei"
Mit "agricultural" erlaubst du gerade die Fahrzeuge, die dort nicht fahren dürfen. Und trotz des Namens des Tags hat das mit Landwirtschaft überhaupt nichts zu tun.
Fischkopp0815 (2022-03-28 03:26:51+00:00): Ist geändert
Warin61 (2022-03-11 21:59:42+00:00): Hi
I don't see vicmap - AERIAL_VG2020 in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Victoria
Can you explain how this source meets OSM copyright requirements?
Warin61 (2022-03-21 22:41:29+00:00): reverted
matthewsheffield (2024-01-09 00:22:50+00:00): I had the following correspondence with DELWP visa email: 

 The following Service Request has been commented on:
Number	SRQ0080573
Requestor	Matthewwickert
Affected User	Matthewwickert
Business Service	Enterprise Spatial Services
State	Pending Customer
Short Description
Upgraded vicmap API for openstreetmap.org contributors.
Comments
09-07-2018 17:28:20 AEST - Peter DebickiComments to Requestor
Hi Matthew,
 
Thanks for the information provided.
The link I provided in my previous email will enable you to check road names and park names by viewing that mapping service.
 
The pricing schedule will depend on a review currently being undertaken an incorporated the various policies such as Open Data and competitive neutrality.
 
To consider giving you access to the WMS service we need you full contact details including address, phone number etc.
 
Regards
 
Peter Debicki
09-07-2018 15:06:35 AEST - MatthewwickertComments to Requestor
reply from: matthewwickert@hotmail.com
 
hi,
 
Thanks for you reply.
 
I'd like to get a username thanks.
 
I am a volunteer with OSM and have used the WMS to find and correct street and park names mostly. Is there going to be any community consultation on the service fee structure, or is it being decided purely by the department/minister?
 
Matthew
 
 
________________________________
From: VicMap Help <vicmap.help@delwp.vic.gov.au>
Sent: 06 July 2018 04:01
To: matthewwickert@hotmail.com
Subject: SRQ0080573 - Upgraded vicmap API for openstreetmap.org contributors.
 
 
Hi Matthew,
 
Thank you for your enquiry.
 
Vicmap API maps are viewable via Mapshare - http://mapshare.maps.vic.gov.au/MapShareVic/index.html?viewer=MapShareVic.PublicSite&locale=en-AU
 
All our tile service users need to be registered in the new tile service. As we didn't know you were a user we could not send you any information regarding its migration.
 
If you wish to use the WMS / WMTS service you need to request that in writing by responding to this email.
 
Please outline your case and specify weather you are an OSM employee or a volunteer and how you wish to utilize the tile service.
 
We care currently reviewing our service fee structure and policy and will inform all users and interested parties later this year.
 
Peter Debicki
 
BDE Vicmap API
Land Use Victoria | Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning
gis.helpdesk@delwp.vic.gov.au
 
 
Description
Received from: matthewwickert@hotmail.com
Email subject: Upgraded vicmap API for openstreetmap.org contributors.
To: support.vicmapapi@delwp.vic.gov.au
hi,
I have been using the API until recently as a contributor to OSM, but the WMS is now unavailable. Is this service still there for community and not-for-profit use; and if so how do I access it?
 
Regards,
 
Matthew
 
Ref:MSGE0640467
Warin61 (2022-03-20 23:39:17+00:00): Reverted owing to probable copyright issue.
Minh Nguyen (2023-06-25 16:15:44+00:00): Should these numbers go in ref rather than name? I suspect most renderers and routers that understand junction names would also understand junction refs.
clay_c (2023-06-25 17:01:03+00:00): At time of writing, there are over 36,000 objects on OSM with junction=yes + name=* [1]. But there are only 908 instances of junction=yes + ref=* [2], 512 of which also have name=* [3]. Many of these appear to be tagging errors, using the ref=* of a nearby highway.

Carto doesn't expose ref=* here. I don't know of any OSM data consumer that does.

[1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/junction=yes#combinations

[2] https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1wzK

[3] https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1wzM
Minh Nguyen (2023-06-25 17:33:07+00:00): Globally, many more intersections are named (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Named_spots_instead_of_street_names ) than numbered in the real world (especially in Japan), so I’m not surprised about the disparity in the database. I had been under the impression that OSRM calls out junction refs at intersections, but junction names aren’t implemented yet (https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/3500 ), so this might just apply to mistagging as junction:ref (which is for link roads).

Perhaps these should be redundantly tagged with ref for the time being, since that’s the more semantically correct key?
clay_c (2023-06-26 18:09:38+00:00): Fine by me. Redundant tagging added here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137803578
mavl (2022-03-12 06:31:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён. Дорога добавлена прямо поверх существующей дороги.
tonyf1 (2022-03-12 00:05:41+00:00): Same comment from me. If changing paths to footways, it would be better if your comment reflected the change and the reason for it.
Thanks
HighRouleur (2022-03-12 02:12:57+00:00): Noted. Will provide more accurate descriptions in future
tonyf1 (2022-03-12 02:16:09+00:00): thanks
literan (2022-03-12 13:26:29+00:00): и зачем ОРАТЬ?

капс удалю, попробуйте еще раз, без него
mavl (2022-05-20 15:43:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:43:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:43:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
ரவி சங்கர் (2024-11-15 08:47:09+00:00): Hi,
Where did you get this name from?
ரவி சங்கர் (2024-11-15 08:47:57+00:00): Hi,
Looks incorrect. Scheduled for deletion.
ரவி சங்கர் (2024-11-15 08:45:17+00:00): Hi,
How did you map this? It doesn't look right.
EMREOYUN (2022-03-18 18:46:54+00:00): Merhaba, OpenStreetMap'a hoş geldiniz. Harita katkılarınız için öncelikle çok teşekkür ederiz ve ekleyebileceğiniz başka katkılarınız varsa eklemekten çekinmeyin :)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-07-20 21:10:34+00:00): Please provide source
Patr1k_P (2022-03-12 20:10:30+00:00): to name tam nema byt...ked tak vyzera socha, neznamena ze ju tak pomenujeme...moc neverim ze tam je taky nazov
Pavol33 (2022-03-13 06:58:51+00:00): upravené