piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-12 10:07:54+00:00): Hi Resource Specialist, welcome to OSM.

Same again, if a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

Some of your deleted ways already contain the above mentioned tags. Could you please revert your map edits? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-12 10:08:11+00:00): Hi Resource Specialist, welcome to OSM.

Same again, if a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

Some of your deleted ways already contain the above mentioned tags. Could you please revert your map edits? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-12 10:08:23+00:00): Hi Resource Specialist, welcome to OSM.

Same again, if a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

Some of your deleted ways already contain the above mentioned tags. Could you please revert your map edits? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SherbetS (2022-11-12 03:05:51+00:00): wrong account.
wireguy (2022-11-13 15:21:39+00:00): hi jrm, nice work.  Quick tip to make it look nicer, press 'Q' key on selected building to square the corners on building.   Also, the track around the football field is not closed (node around the 4 o'clock spot is split).   Keep mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-12 10:08:44+00:00): Hi Resource Specialist, welcome to OSM.

Same again, if a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

Some of your deleted ways already contain the above mentioned tags. Could you please revert your map edits? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Resource Specialist (2022-11-15 05:00:36+00:00): It was obviously not making a difference with access=private or access=no.  They are all still showing up on AllTrails.  You need to have them removed or you need to find a way to keep them from showing on public maps.  You are causing harm to federally listed species by encouraging illegal activity.  What do you suggest?
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-16 21:34:58+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
Did you try to contact AllTrails?

OpenStreetMap "creates and distributes free geographic data for the world". It's fine, if consumer use our data. But IMHO when the consumer, in this case here AllTrails, doesn't proper use OSM, you or other should not delete well mapped features in OSM.
Resource Specialist (2022-11-18 17:11:29+00:00): Those are not trails you are listing.  They are not well-mapped features.  They are illegal trails that are built by criminals in violation of OCCO 2-5-26(a).  You need to keep them off your map...or you are encouraging crime and will be liable for the damage caused.
Murcik (2023-01-16 09:38:36+00:00): А разве знамя женского рода?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243045531/history
tbicr (2023-01-16 10:00:43+00:00): вітаю, првільна Чырвонае/Краснае - выправіў, назвы былі дададзеныя раней
tastrax (2022-11-24 04:37:43+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
bxl-forever (2022-11-12 19:56:27+00:00): Hello,

This changeset will be set for review: houses drawn by following aerial imagery instead of correct building outlines from AIV Flanders GRB are probably wrong. :-(

To review later.
ElineBe (2022-11-15 15:02:25+00:00): Thank you for noticing, I should have marked this for review. I am not aware that it is possible to base on GRB. Can you tell me how I can do this?
bxl-forever (2022-11-15 16:03:38+00:00): I see you are using the iD editor.
When you are editing the map, there are buttons on the right side on the screen. One of the buttons in the middle if the "Backgrounds" button: click on this one and scroll down to "AIV Flanders GRB".  Then you can see the correct basemap.  Normally, you can trust this data.
bxl-forever (2022-11-15 16:06:39+00:00): (Sorry, I sent the previous message too fast, here is a better version.)

I see you are using the iD editor.
When you are editing the map, there are buttons on the right side of the screen. One of the buttons in the middle is the "Backgrounds" button: click on this one and scroll down to "AIV Flanders GRB". Then you can see the correct basemap. Normally, you can trust this data; but just like all government data it is sometimes outdated.
Don’t worry too much about this street, I had planned to spend some time reviewing the line of houses here, reshape them and check the numbers, hopefully in a few days.
ElineBe (2022-11-16 18:45:54+00:00): Thank you! Next time I add houses, I will base it on the GRB (and also the aerial photo's to see if the buildings are still there). I have biked through this street since, but I forgot to check if the supermarket still exist. That is for next time I pass there :) The reason I added the street is that I searched an address in this street, and did not find it on OSM. So I added whole of the street :)
Frans S (2022-11-18 12:46:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
I refer to my comments on your mappings a few months ago where your mappings were below par.
Apparently this didn't help because your mappings are still below par.
Use the correct tagging for buildings.
Building=yes.  No landuse=residential. 
this tag is intended to mark an area as inhabited with buildings, like hamlets, villages and towns.

Your mappings include multiple buildings. Each building should be mapped individually.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128797410
Murcik (2023-01-08 18:40:03+00:00): Зачем убрали name:ru? адпаведна з proposal?
Наприклад 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2784851739/history
Murcik (2023-01-08 18:42:43+00:00): Пардон, перепутал.  name:ru остался
kurisubrooks (2022-11-12 04:12:48+00:00): Hi Kyle, just looking at The Northern Road/M12 intersection that you changed (-33.85700/150.69591), we don't map to lanes in the way that you've added and the "square" layout that I originally had mapped was in fact correct. Would you mind reverting this part? The tagging also appears to be incorrect/inconsistent with the rest of the under construction segments (though physically built), and should be kept as "under construction". Thanks, Chris.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-11-12 04:39:15+00:00): Hi, sorry this is what I saw at many other interchanges around syndey (e.g. https://osm.org/#map=19/-33.91897/150.85298). will fix
kurisubrooks (2022-11-12 04:44:45+00:00): Hi Kyle, that's not a problem at all. Roads aren't mapped to individual lanes and line markings in OSM but rather physical separation, barriers, etc., so for intersections with no physical separation, the intersection should be more square-like to help routing. You can see an example of this below.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-33.75023/150.68806

If you'd like, we're very active on the OpenStreetMap World discord server under the Oceania category, we'd be happy to help you and give advice on anything should you need it or have any questions. 
https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
❤️‍🔥 (2022-11-12 05:13:23+00:00): cool, I'll join the discord tonight. yeah the number of exceptions to that rule confused me a bit. stuff like this: https://osm.org/#map=19/-33.82962/151.21377
kurisubrooks (2022-11-12 05:15:08+00:00): Yeah wow that is an absolute mess of a junction. I'll bring that one up in the Discord to be re-done, because that's absolutely incorrect. Please do let me know if you know any more and we can make a list!
❤️‍🔥 (2022-11-19 00:37:15+00:00): hi again. I signed up to discord but couldn't figure out how to join the oceania group...

anyway, here's a few of those junctions that I noticed. and i'm happy to change 'oneway' to 'railway:preferred_direction' as you mentioned in a different thread, if you think that's a good idea

https://osm.org/#map=19/-33.94190/150.94304
https://osm.org/#map=19/-33.94315/151.07755
https://osm.org/#map=19/-33.81236/151.17632
https://osm.org/#map=19/-33.82971/151.21428
https://osm.org/#map=19/-33.95666/150.87690
https://osm.org/#map=19/-33.71996/151.10686
kurisubrooks (2022-11-21 10:30:07+00:00): Hi Kyle, in the #rules-and-roles channel in the server, if you scroll up to the top and read from the top-down, it explains how to join channels and get your roles, including for the #oceania group. Let me know if you have any troubles :)
Glassman (2022-11-12 16:21:32+00:00): Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128798289
jnighan (2023-09-12 20:12:06+00:00): Hi, Corporate Drive should actually be highway=residential based on local classification guidelines. For info please read the Connecticut guidelines for highway=residential and highway=unclassified here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification
archpdx (2022-11-12 06:45:51+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenstreetMap! It looks like your changeset comment got cut off since its longer than 255 characters
ogrenh (2022-11-12 16:36:02+00:00): The trail that heads North away from the Golden Garden Park towards Clear Lake Road is on private land and is not considered part of the park trails system.  I am also unsure if it actually continues along the side of Clear Lake Road.
DavidKarlas (2022-11-12 06:15:18+00:00): Hi,

looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14697146 got broken with this change, could you try to fix it?

Thanks!
trafficone (2022-11-12 05:51:30+00:00): 私はこの情報について確かめない。農大通りの左右側に白線があるが、全通りに歩けたり、自転車たりでる。
archpdx (2022-11-12 06:52:31+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that you changed the building from a restroom to just a building. If this building also houses a restroom, I would add a point for the restroom so that data isn't lost.

Also, please note that we don't use the name field to describe features in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Instead, I recommend changing the feature type for this building to a 'Picnic Shelter'
ogrenh (2022-11-12 16:33:15+00:00): Thank you for the info!  I am very new to this site, so thank you for checking what I am doing.  I just found out I can search for feature names like 'picnic shelter', I couldn't spot it as an option in the dropdown menu at first.  I have updated the shelter to that new feature type. Thanks!
Enock4seth (2022-11-13 14:46:25+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, don't just remove tags from objects if you are not sure of what you are doing, e.g. you removed the primary tag `amenity=school` and other useful ones from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364741731 (I have reverted this)

Also, use the title case form for names. Eg.  Klikor Hotel not KLIKOR HOTEL. 

Only add names to prominent buildings where they apply, i.e. if they really have the said name, not because it is owned by Person  A or Person B.
eggie (2022-11-12 18:51:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
iandees (2022-11-12 15:30:24+00:00): Hello. It looks like many of the things you're deleting do in fact still exist. What is your data source for these things no longer existing?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128799472
boopington (2022-11-12 18:31:55+00:00): Esri world imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128799472
MxxCon (2022-11-12 06:41:09+00:00): Hello.
Is it not a pedestrian street now?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128799868
mangosorbet (2022-11-12 18:40:01+00:00): Hi MxxCon, 
Thanks in advance for your assistance in resolving this issue. Hamilton Place (between 136 and 138 streets) is no longer a roadway, as it was before the park renovation. What used to be the car roadways has now been taken over by the park and pedestrian path. I took some pictures this morning to share, if there is some way to do so, pls advise. The capital project relocated the utilities that were under the roadway and now almost 4 years later the park has reopened, wider.  What used to be the roadway and parking spaces has been added to the lawn/park area, as well as to a pedestrian plaza at the south end (136 Street). There continues to be a pedestrian path along the east perimeter of the park, but it is laid out with hex pavers, as most NYC parks are.

I'm a newbie at OSM, so I would be grateful for your advise in resolving this matter.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128799868
mangosorbet (2022-11-12 18:47:51+00:00): Actually, this aerial shot was taken during the early stages of construction, when the utility pipes along the west perimeter of the park were being upgraded. Contractor staged on Hamilton Place, as you can see in this picture, partially obstructing the street. Now that street (Hamilton Place) is no longer there at all, between 136 and 138th st.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128799868
MxxCon (2022-11-14 00:25:40+00:00): "Sidewalk" generally refers to...sidewalk :) ie pedestrian path that runs along a street/road. If that street gets blocked from traffic and becomes an open street or a pedestrian street then it should be tagged as "Pedestrian street". :)
I updated it as such
mangosorbet (2022-11-14 01:56:19+00:00): Thanks!!

Here's what it looks like now:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/yxa30ojwm9dbzf9/IMG_7845.HEIC?dl=0
MxxCon (2022-11-14 05:29:34+00:00): Hmm. That looks like rather significant change from the satellite imagery.
End0fLine (2022-11-12 04:23:22+00:00): source:

https://www.scooterscoffee.com/blog/post/scooters-coffee-opens-first-location-in-cleburne-tx

Aerials have not been updated.
Warin61 (2022-11-20 05:42:59+00:00): Hi,

Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments ... The park relation 14877745 shares segments .. 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.18108&lat=-37.66048&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Warin61 (2022-11-23 05:07:57+00:00): relation deleted - same error as last 2 deletions...
Warin61 (2022-11-25 05:45:54+00:00): Relation 14877744 diamond creek res - error 'shares segments'... just like the above. 

I'll leave it a week and see if you have made any attempt at fixing it.
Frans S (2022-11-14 12:02:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Do not map a compound with a few buildings surrounded with walls as 1 building. Just map each building separately.
On this webpage you can see what I have adjusted
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128887564
see the legend for explanation of the colors.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128800660
Glassman (2022-11-12 20:15:47+00:00): The US doesn't have any living streets as defined in the wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street. I changed it to residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128800728
Geo-Tobi (2023-04-22 10:39:12+00:00): Hallo LightSpirit, das ist etwas seltsam: Auf Komoot sind an dieser Stelle
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128800959#map=18/50.27974/7.82851
gleich 2 Bilder von verschiedenen Nutzern zu sehen, die eine asphaltierte Straße zeigen. Bin daher stutzig geworden, da du den Track erst vor wenigen Monaten bearbeitet hast dieser auf grade2 sitzt.
Sind die Bilder im Komoot schlichtweg falsch positioniert oder wurde hier in den vergangenen Monaten einiges asphaltiert? Wenn ich mir das auf Google Maps anschauen, tendiere ich tatsächlich zu asphaltiert. Aber das darf natürlich keine Quelle sein. Hast du evtl. Ortskenntnis? Danke dir
LightSpirit (2023-04-22 16:38:59+00:00): Dann setze sie doch einfach auf grade1, asphaltiert. Ist doch kein Problem.
Habe mit Luftbildern gearbeitet. Bin erst in den nächsten Tagen in der Gegend zum Wandern.
Geo-Tobi (2023-04-22 18:07:00+00:00): Nicht erlaubt. Google Maps ist keine gültige Quelle. Muss bitte anders verifiziert werden.
Grüße
LightSpirit (2023-04-22 22:37:38+00:00): Es gibt so viele Luftbilder. Zum Beispiel auf dieser Seite: https://geodaten.naturschutz.rlp.de/kartendienste_naturschutz/
limes11 (2023-08-12 19:39:13+00:00): Welche zulässigen Luftbilder gibt es

https://geodaten.naturschutz.rlp.de/kartendienste_naturschutz/

?

Ich sehe dort nur Luftbilder unter den Geobasisdaten. Die können nicht benutzt werden, das fällt unter
DL-DE->BY-2.0
LightSpirit (2023-08-14 23:05:31+00:00): Dann kann es Vor-Ort entschieden werden. Ich mach es nicht, weil ich in der Gegend schon durch bin.

Gruß
Oliver
Vonter (2022-11-27 11:42:52+00:00): I think it's better to tag the complete but as of now inaccessible sections of road (like the CDP road sections) as highway=construction. In terms of rendering I think it looks odd and that it could mess up routing engines so it's better to leave it as under construction.

I've changed the tagging in an edit of mine for now, but if there's any reason that you feel having it as highway=primary is more accurate, I would be happy to reconsider this tagging choice.

Link to my edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129431020#map=15/12.9268/77.7128
uknown-gryphus (2022-11-28 02:18:12+00:00): Yep this change makes sense to me. The reason I had marked it as primary previously was because I thought those sections were accessible through almost-complete-but-not-asphalted sections, but the satellite imagery is outdated, and I haven't had any excuse to survey the CDP roads :D, so leaving them as highway=construction is fine
Glassman (2022-11-12 20:13:47+00:00): #TIP: We don't use descriptive names in OSM. 
#TIP: Often other imagery is clearer or more current. For example, the Maxar Premium imagery shows the house and street. I've modified the house and street to match the imagery. Feel free to improve.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128801190
KasperSFranz (2023-11-28 21:07:00+00:00): Hi,
you have added both not:brand:wikidata and brand:wikidata which is conflicting - I am assuming the not:brand:wikidata tag is wrong so I have removed it :).
abakus_uploader (2022-11-12 23:41:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Josef73 (2023-03-01 03:48:06+00:00): Hello, is it only open on Saturday, Sunday and Tueseday?
Warin61 (2022-11-15 23:02:30+00:00): Hi,
Ther is a duplication of a node on way  	1112435432 .. this causes crossing of the way.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.49971&lat=-32.16812&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
wireguy (2022-12-04 16:12:57+00:00): BPTT, Southpoint and Lyons Park boundaries are broken.   Can you revisit all the boundary changes and correct?
BPTT (2022-12-04 22:31:25+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up! Corrected.
wireguy (2022-12-04 22:44:17+00:00): Southpoint still has a member without a role: way 501568188
(would fix, but didn't want to collide)
emwexx (2022-12-06 19:48:48+00:00): Heya. The grass area is really between the parking lot and the beach area. On (old) aerial imagery it rather looks like you have changed it to, but in reality (I've been there and still have pics around) the grass area is sitting between parking and beach.
The huts are at the edge, but within the forest as placed.
How I added this area there was likely not the best from a technical point of view. "id" is sometimes a PITA. :)

Greetings from Germany!
jorchr (2022-12-06 23:23:59+00:00): I have changed the grass area as I think you mean it should be. I am trying to fix woodland all over southern Sweden, and base it mostly on areal images. In this spot there may have been an error indication from OSM inspector. If you think it should be further modified, feel free to do so.
emwexx (2022-12-08 23:04:06+00:00): Heya jorchr. I assume this was the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:multipolygon#Touching_inner_rings problem?

It took me 4 attempts to get it right - hopefully. Not that funny honestly. I completely broke the forest rendering in between. Now I am not sure if it's just tile caches or still something broken.

I will check with OSM Inspector after it has updated it's map data. Will take care of any issues.

Thanks for your efforts. Perhaps one day I can enjoy the swedish landscape again.

Enjoy and Merry Christmas!
jorchr (2022-12-09 07:04:35+00:00): Yes, I think there were an issue with touching inner rings. I don’t fully understand the discussion you link to, but touching inner rings is a pain. After an editing session, I always need to check the next OSM Inspector update to fix any error I might have create. Some errors are next to impossible to find without OSM Inspector. I think I need to accept that areas get broken this way for a day, in order to do the work.
Happy Christmas to you as well!
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-12 10:02:21+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128806141
SekeRob (2022-11-12 07:23:32+00:00): Mapper was CS commented and PM'd without response.