piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chlenix (2021-04-11 15:55:29+00:00): прежде чем двигать что-либо, надо удостоверится в правильном смещении снимков. проверить по трекам жпс. Для слоя "Николаев 2018" смещение проверено и определено - 9.64 8.13 !!! используйте  его.  Вы испортили развязку. Ваши правки отменяю как вредительские. Спасибо
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102739680
chlenix (2021-04-11 15:53:48+00:00): прежде чем двигать что-либо, надо удостоверится в правильном смещении снимков. проверить по трекам жпс. Для слоя "Николаев 2018" смещение проверено и определено - 9.64 8.13 !!! используйте  его. Ваши правки отменяю как вредительские. Спасибо
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102739769
eggie (2021-04-11 15:02:49+00:00): Tip: Je kunt dan toevoegen
construction=footway

Bij alle wegen die gereed zijn moet die specificatie er juist weer af.
MVG
eggie
HSL_HRT (2021-12-29 06:50:46+00:00): Korjasin tämän tagityksen vastaamaan OSM:ssa työmaille tarkoitettua skeemaa joka on kuvattu täällä ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
HSL_HRT (2021-12-29 06:51:07+00:00): Pitäisi siis käyttää ...
highway=cycleway => highway=construction + construction=cycleway

Eikä ...
access=no + bicycle=no + foot=no
HSL_HRT (2021-12-29 06:52:04+00:00): Sinänsähän vaikutus eri reitityssoftille (kuten esim. reittioppaalle) pääosin sama, mutta nuo access-tagitykset ja kulkumuotokohtaiset rajoitukset saattavat helposti joiltain osin unohtua tuonne OSM:iin. Lisäksi tietenkin nämä työn alla olevat väylät saatetaan jossain sovelluksissa haluta visualisoida hieman eri tavalla.
Romwriter (2021-06-05 12:14:20+00:00): Hallo Patchi, zu diesem Änderungssatz habe ich eine Rückfrage. Hast Du in der Maximilianstraße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815822086) nur einen Syntaxfehler korrigiert, oder kannst Du aus eigenem Wissen bestätigen, dass die dortige Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung korrekt ist?
Patchi (2021-06-05 16:11:34+00:00): Hallo Romwriter,

Ich habe bei der Anpassung alle ÖNPV-Linien auf der Straße eine Fehlermeldung mit JOSM bekommen, also ja ich habe "nur" einen Syntaxfehler behoben.

Grüße,

Patchi.
Romwriter (2021-06-05 17:43:10+00:00): Alles klar, vielen Dank!
eggie (2021-04-11 15:05:37+00:00): Dag elwyn.. Je hebt de highway=pedestrian regel verwijderd. Dus de weg zal nu van de kaart verdwijnen. 
Ik heb 'm maar weer toegevoegd. 
MVG
eggie
elwyn1975 (2021-04-11 16:23:50+00:00): Dat klopt. Ik liep daar laatst en zag dat het geen straat is Het is een inpandig pad door het ziekenhuiscomplex. Het is niet openbaar toegankelijk.
eggie (2021-04-11 17:21:46+00:00): Oke.. Denk alleen dat highway=corridor nog niet rendert, maar dat is een ander probleem.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-04-11 14:22:13+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for tidying up some of the mess here.  Just one more thing - it'd be great if your changesets had a descriptive comment in addition to just a bunch of hashtags, as required by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
With regard to the hashtags, presumably "#hotosm-project-10634" means "a project on some server somewhere" (but which one?)  "#covid19" presumably means "something to do with Covid 19" (but what?) and "#COVWales" presumably doesn't mean anything but is designed to allow people to find https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/South_Wales_COVID_19_Vulnerability_Mapping , which should have been set up in accordance with https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rupertmaesglas but was not?
ravali_78 (2021-04-12 08:17:51+00:00): Hello changannie,
I have fixed the Mismatched geometry at this way 129319516 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102784671,
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102741274
PT-53 (2021-04-11 16:35:50+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
Du hast als source die Esri-Luftbilder angegeben. Hier in der Gegend sind aber die Bing-Luftbilder aus dem Zeitraum 08-10-2020 und damit wesentlich aktueller.
Schau Dir doch Deine Änderungen nochmal mit den Bing-Luftbilern an, insbesondere diese Fläche:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929220807/history
Grüße
user_5359 (2021-04-12 04:03:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/226891498/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
Mika van de wiel (2021-04-12 15:25:05+00:00): maybe change some of the waterway=waterfall to waterway=rapid

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
Hadi Omid (2021-04-12 14:51:12+00:00): سلام، وقت بخیر
بعضی از تغییرات شما بنظر صحیح نیست
مثلا مسیر زیر
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929223321#map=19/26.50234/54.03280
تغییراتی که انجام میدید بر چه اساسی هست؟
HamiiidAA (2021-04-12 17:00:46+00:00): سلام
وقت شمام بخیر
من ساکن کیش هستم
مسیری که کشیدم درست هست
ضمن اینکه نقشه هوایی که وجود داره، خیلییییییییییییییییییییییییییییی قدیمی هست
HamiiidAA (2021-04-12 17:22:52+00:00): درود و احترام
برخی از تغییرات و مسیرهایی که کشیدم نیستن، شما حذف کردید مسیرهای جدید و تغییرات رو ؟
Hadi Omid (2021-04-12 18:40:48+00:00): سلام مجدد
خیر من تغییرات شما رو حذف نکردم
فقط چون شک کردم ازتون پرسیدم
Hadi Omid (2021-04-12 20:57:12+00:00): یه مورد رو فراموش کردم بگم اینکه تصاویر بینگ خیلی قدیمی هستن اما میتونید از تصاویر ماکسار استفاده کنید
HamiiidAA (2021-04-13 02:44:03+00:00): درود و ارادت
آخه دیدم بعضی تغییرات اعمال شده، بعضی‌هاش نه. پس زمان‌بر هست اعمال تغییرات

خیالتون راحت، خرابکاری نکردم، اسامی و خیابان‌های تازه کشیده شده رو که تو نقشه‌ هوایی‌ها نیست رو کشیدم و به روز کردم و محدودیت سرعت‌ها و بعضی مکان‌ها رو بروز رسانی کردم (خیلی کار داره)
در مورد تصاویر ماکسار که گفتید، پشت سیستم نیستم، رفتم سراغ سیستمم، اگه نتونستم پیداش کنم، پیام میدم که راهنماییم کنید چجوری پیداش کنم، چون برلی سمت فرودگاه و ترمینال جدید که ساختن، برای رسم خیابان‌هاش، کمک میخوام، اگه نقشه مثل نقشه الان گوگل باشه میتونم بکشم
ارادت
Hadi Omid (2021-04-13 04:06:39+00:00): تغییرات همون لحظه اعمال میشه روی سایت اما چون تایل ها کش هستن، ممکنه یکی دو روز طول بکشه تا تغییرات رو ببینید ولی روی ادیتور آخرین تغییرات وجود داره. تصاویر ماکسار به اندازه تصاویر گوگل جدید نیست اما خیلی جدیدتر از تصاویر بینگ هست و کار شما راحت تر میشه
پیشنهاد میکنم اگه از تلگرام استفاده میکنید عضو گروه بشید اونجا دوستان زیادی هستن که هر سوالی داشته باشید راهنمایی میکنن
HamiiidAA (2021-04-13 04:14:49+00:00): ممنونم
بله عضو هستم تو کانال و گروه تلگرام
Mika van de wiel (2021-04-12 15:26:35+00:00): See the previous changesets comments i have placed, think same is true for this
JodaStephen (2021-04-13 08:10:40+00:00): Hi! I noticed that there are two users working on Plough Lane at the moment. I'm the mapper who has added many buildings and addresses in Raynes Park. It would be great if you can both use the same image offset from Bing. I'm recommending an offset of (3.93,-2.23) - https://blog.mapbox.com/better-openstreetmap-data-with-ids-new-imagery-offset-tool-ff1906ef6c53 (and recommended the same to sblondon, the other local mapper) Hope that helps, thanks, Stephen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102741912
DaveArq (2021-04-13 09:54:13+00:00): Happy to do that - I've been trying to use a combination of the UK cadastral data and local GPS traces using my phone as a lot of the new stuff isn't on the imagery yet, but I'll try applying the suggested offset specifically. I presume this is the same one you've uploaded from JOSM recently too? If so I can probably deprecate the other offsets I uploaded more locally
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102741912
JodaStephen (2021-04-13 10:35:39+00:00): Thanks. (3.93,-2.23) is from Wimbledon Chase, but I've been happy with it so far from New Malden to Wimbledon. My one is "Cadastral at Wimbledon Chase" in the offset database. I should probably deprecate my old ones too.
Mika van de wiel (2021-04-12 15:27:00+00:00): Perfect!
osmviborg (2021-04-11 15:32:59+00:00): Vil du være så venlig ikke at navngive stierne på en kirkegård.
Mika van de wiel (2021-04-12 15:32:04+00:00): Street needs to be connected? I have updated it and connected it to the street
whb (2021-04-14 08:47:21+00:00): Hi,

wurden diese beiden Treppen aus Naturstein wirklich betoniert?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61187559
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47276850

Viele Grüße
whb
jalaska (2021-04-14 09:52:33+00:00): Hi,
Eher unwahrscheinlich, sah im Vorbeifahren wahrscheinlich nur so aus. Werde es korrigieren, wenn du dir sicher bist, dass sie mal aus Naturstein waren/sind. BTW wie wuerdest du das dann taggen? Bin jetzt dazu uebergegangen diese Naturstein Treppen als "sett" zu taggen, da rock irgendwie auch nicht wirklich passt (was ich am Anfang oefter dafuer verwendet hatte). Schoene Gruesse
whb (2021-04-16 09:08:01+00:00): Hi,

ja, da bin ich mir sicher. Habe die Oberfläche auf "sett" geändert, das passt am besten.

Viele Grüße
whb
jalaska (2021-04-16 09:34:10+00:00): Danke fuer die Rueckmeldung und Verbesserung! Gruessle
trial (2021-07-06 15:39:01+00:00): Bonjour j'avoue que landuse=military et du nom Caserne Frébault (929232983, v1) me surprend. Est-ce le nom actuel? Non le nom du quartier c'est Quartier Frébault et son usage c'est residentiel. Annuler ou mettre a minima  une end_date.
Jean-Pierre Rondeau (2021-07-07 18:11:26+00:00): Bonsoir,
Effectivement, votre remarque est pertinente. Le site du Quartier Frébault est détruit depuis 1961. Je viens de compléter ce point sur la définition de cette zone pour éviter toute confusion avec l'affectation actuelle de ce territoire en zone résidentielle. 
Cordialement.
Jean-Pierre Rondeau
Mika van de wiel (2021-04-12 15:33:57+00:00): this was the changeset where you added the turning circle, the comments on that changeset still count on this one, other than that this is perfect
ravali_78 (2021-04-12 07:53:30+00:00): Hello ʕ•́ᴥ•̀ʔ
I have fixed the alignmenet as building ploygon overlapping with residential road way 5039105 ,kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102782583,
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102743106
Anil Basnet (2021-06-22 02:50:53+00:00): The circular structures you mapped as buildings are not actually buildings, they are actually circular haystacks. So, I am removing them. Remember while mapping in rural areas of Nepal what you see circular is never building, it is either haystack or tubewell.
aharvey (2022-04-25 04:12:05+00:00): For the ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929237617 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929237615 I couldn't see any route signage if these have no formed path and no route signage then per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australia/Walking_Tracks these should likely not be mapped. Are they part of any formal route?
UggiePM (2022-04-25 06:37:29+00:00): Hello Mr. Harvey, these tracks are a part of the "Taronga Zoo to Spit Bridge" walk (unofficial). Also, there's a "Harbour Bridge to The Spit Bridge walking track" which is official but these off-track paths are not included in that. I edited in those paths according to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-6NrnKyoCQ 
and
http://wildwalks.com/bushwalking-and-hiking-in-nsw/sydney-harbour-north-side/taronga-zoo-to-spit-bridge.html
to be able to build
https://bushwalk.com/j/O63PAR/

But according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australia/Walking_Tracks
these fall into the last category which means they shouldn't be mapped right? Sorry if these are misleading, back in that time I was a beginner at editing and didn't know much (still consider myself a beginner but with much more info :D). I'd love to listen to your ideas or guidance about what to do in situations like this (if you'd like to ofc).
user_2066394 (2021-04-11 20:04:05+00:00): Kann man die Änderungen noch beschreiben?
Khou1002 (2021-04-12 18:12:58+00:00): Hallo; 
drei neue Gebäude mit Adresse ergänzt; Außerdem habe ich den Verlauf der Stromleitung von Oberau nach Ettal korrigiert
user_5359 (2021-04-12 03:58:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't forget the key layer in combination with tunnel (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:layer)
Kovoschiz (2021-04-12 05:32:42+00:00): 1. Unfortunately `=road` means an undetermined road, not a general carriageway. 
2. `=service` means it is a road serving a facility. No neccessary implication on legal restriction. 
3. `access=yes` etc are what's used to show this.
JamesHartw (2021-04-12 15:30:21+00:00): Thank you for the tip.
Mika van de wiel (2021-04-13 08:14:21+00:00): Seems to be good
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 16:43:22+00:00): Hello sava eskimo,
Could you please provide some evidence that "Evolution Downhill" is actually signed on the ground here?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 16:49:57+00:00): The trails are on private property, the owner is one of the members of the evolution team. The agreement is not to disturb nature and not to create signs.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 16:51:41+00:00): ... then it sounds very much as if these trails do not belong in OSM.
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 16:54:37+00:00): The trails can be kept on OSM, only there will be no signposts, at least for now
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 16:56:21+00:00): I have a question for you: does this mean that no trail that does not have a signpost can be on OSM?
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 16:59:47+00:00): If https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918926483 really is a "highway=cycleway" then yes, it can keep those tags.  If it's not signed then no, it should not keep that name.  Similarly if https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12567182 doesn't really have that name (apart from you making it up) then no, that doesn't really belong in OSM either.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 17:01:56+00:00): > I have a question for you: does this mean that no trail that does not have a signpost can be on OSM?
That's generally the rule, yes.  As an example, one of the route pages is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking and that says "... signposted ..." in lots of places.
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 17:12:03+00:00): So I can delete everything I've routed so far?
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 17:25:21+00:00): Ok, I will now delete these two paths and when I have time I will delete everything that I personally routed and is not marked with signs.
kapazao (2024-02-07 13:45:31+00:00): Hello, could you explain what is voltage:primary=-25000 that you added in a lot of elements like this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8617859340)?
NieWnen (2021-04-11 16:12:24+00:00): Warto dodać odpowiedni tag, który wskaże przeznaczenie obiektu, a nie tylko nazwę.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:shop%3Dtyres
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102744726
Jordi MF (2022-08-15 23:56:41+00:00): Hola Jose,
Gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM. He visto que has añadido el nombre de numerosas sendas y pistas. Los nombres de las senda y pistas deben ser oficiales (IGN, ICV, ayuntamientos...), estar marcadas por organismos oficiales, tener cierto reconocimiento histórico (como las antiguas veredas) o ser muy populares entre la población local. En este caso, he visto que muchos nombres que has añadido son descriptivos del tipo "conexión al...". Esto no sería correcto, por lo que habría que eliminar dicho nombre.

Por otra parte, muchos de los nombres que has añadido son nombres recientes entre ciclistas de MTB o corredores. En este caso, existe el etiquetado más preciso "mtb:name=*" que nos sirve para poder mantener este tipo de nombres. Con todo esto, trasladaré los nombres a este etiquetado más exacto.
Un saludo,
Jordi MF.
Mika van de wiel (2021-04-13 08:19:08+00:00): These administrative boundries can be moved, with no issue's but issues can occur when you start adding stuff or deleting stuff.

I have not checked every point to see if you have changed stuff, but as far as i can see you only moved it? if this is the case there is nothing to worry about, otherwise let me know, and i will see if i can spot the issue's. These administative boundries are part of relations, these have an order. If you add stuff it will be added on the rear of the relation, while the point may be in the middle, thats why its hard to add or remove points from these.
Leo Slager (2021-04-12 10:27:24+00:00): Dag Josbert,
2 van de 4 routes van lijn 62 heb ik weer teruggezet naar disused:route.
Dit ivm de werkzaamheden bij Neede. Zie ook mijn note op de relaties van die 4 busroutes.
Leo Slager (2021-04-12 10:28:44+00:00): Hier kun je de foutmelding zien:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=6.63179&lat=52.12943&zoom=13&opacity=0.71&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-15 06:38:09+00:00): Zmiana https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2653713770/history na Czrtowiec to pomyłka była, prawda?
astro79 (2021-10-15 17:46:18+00:00): Tak to literówka była :)
faustopt (2021-04-16 11:06:35+00:00): A Fazenda Tchimbolelo é uma Marca Comercial registada em nome da empresa Agrigrow Sociedade Agricola, Lda e é grafada com o "T". O local Chimbolelo/Vale do Chimbolelo é grafado sem o "T". O Rio é Chimbolele ou Tchimbolele com "E" no fim. FONTES: Fazenda Tchimbolelo (https://clarifiedby.diligenciagroup.com/company/summary/3708106-fazenda-tchimbolelo-limitada - https://www.livestock1.com/livestock-supply-companies/agrigrow-sociedade-a - https://www.facebook.com/people/Fazenda-Tchimbolelo/100003608649898/) Vale do Chimbolelo (http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/ang63637.pdf - http://tpa.sapo.ao/multimedia/5-furos-operacionais-no-vale-do-chimbolelo-e-embala-do-rei-nos-gambos) Rio Chimbolele/Tchimbolele (https://www.geonames.org/3345916/tchimbolete.html)
voschix (2025-10-24 20:59:05+00:00): Hi Hanna. Fedback on way 881221713.
I would not tag it with bicycle=yes. Unless I have overlooked something, on the ground there is no sign indicating bicycle use. If it is used habitually by cyclists despite this, you could tag it with bicycle=permissive.
user_2066394 (2021-04-11 20:39:55+00:00): Ist das Mathabräu Wirtshaus tatsächlich wieder eröffnet worden?
Tobi125690 (2021-04-12 01:51:10+00:00): Ja, letztes Frühjahr. Gibt ja auch eine Webseite und Nachrichten zur Eröffnung. War dort schon essen. Mal schauen ob sie die aktuelle Zeit überleben.
user_2066394 (2021-04-12 07:51:57+00:00): Letztes Frühjahr bedeutet 2020? Hintergrund ist folgender:
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/fuerstenfeldbruck/fuerstenfeldbruck-marthabraeu-corona-auflagen-1.5090608
user_2066394 (2021-04-13 10:56:09+00:00): Kommt da noch was?
Tobi125690 (2021-04-13 11:35:07+00:00): Ja ich war im Frühjahr 2020 dort essen.

Jetzt hat es aktuell geschlossen, aber das haben ja fast alle Wirtshäuser (v.a. mit deutscher Küche weil Liefern hier unüblich ist) außerhalb der Großstädte (zu wenig Kundschaft).

Was die da an Renovierung reingesteckt haben werden die alles dafür tun nochmal aufzumachen. Steht ja auch so im SZ Artikel:

"Um das Überleben des Lokals zu sichern, würden dessen Türen vorerst geschlossen, denn ein wirtschaftlicher Betrieb sei aktuell nicht möglich. Vorschriften wie eine vorgezogene Sperrstunde oder eine Begrenzung der Gäste an einem Tisch kämen einem "unausgesprochenen Lockdown" gleich, sagt Bauer weiter. Die Betreiber wollen aber das Gasthaus wieder aufschließen, sobald es die Umstände zulassen."
user_2066394 (2021-04-13 13:24:51+00:00): Der ursprüngliche POI liegt hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/389955471
und ist mit disused*=* eingetragen, kann also jederzeit reaktiviert werden. Momentan sieht es aber nicht so aus.
MxxCon (2021-04-11 23:58:02+00:00): Hello.
Do you have any links corroborating this name change? 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102746406
mbeyerle (2021-04-12 00:27:33+00:00): yes! Didn't source it because link already exists in source of the way: https://edc.nyc/project/east-midtown-waterfront

"Now known as East Midtown Greenway - 53rd to 61st Streets, this northern section of the esplanade connects to Andrew Haswell Green Park at 62nd Street and will include a pedestrian bridge to East 54th Street (In progress)"
ravali_78 (2021-04-12 07:38:51+00:00): Hello iopbenson,
I have fixed the overlapping residential highways as per the ground truth way 929570622,Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102781330.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102746849
woodpeck (2021-04-13 18:39:09+00:00): I have a question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919145419 - on the aerial imagery it looks as if this was a little stream with trees along it. Is this a bike trail on the ground? For a bike trail to exist in OSM it must be verifiable on the ground. Someone must be able to go there and say: Yep, clearly this is "Evolution trail 2". If this is NOT the case - if "Evolution trail 2" is just something that someone has drawn on a map, like "you can ride your bike here", but on the ground there is no signage and nothing, then it is difficult to map it as a MTB trail in OSM.
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 19:03:21+00:00): I just uploaded a GPS file to OSM. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/sava%20eskimo/traces/3635816
It looks like this STRAVA Global Heatmap https://www.strava.com/heatmap#15.75/18.35652/43.80028/hot/ride
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 16:32:02+00:00): Hello sava eskimo,
Could you please provide some evidence that "Evolution DH 2 trail" is actually signed on the ground here?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 16:43:56+00:00): maybe I have gpx files, the awesome heatmap shows that it rides with bikes. I'll try to find the pictures
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 16:47:08+00:00): No, gpx files would not be good enough.  We're looking for evidence that the name "Evolution DH 2 trail" is signed on the ground and not just something you made up.
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 16:47:41+00:00): If you think of signs as signposts, they do not exist. If they are necessary, you can delete the relation
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 16:52:57+00:00): Like the other one - I would request that you delete it, actually!
joost schouppe (2021-05-18 13:03:05+00:00): Thanks for the addition. I removed several tags that were not necessary and combined the three segments into a single segment. Maybe the south part is also part of the driveway?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102747162
user_2066394 (2021-04-15 10:41:28+00:00): Kurz als Hinweis, das Restaurant ist hier seit 2015 auf dem Umriss eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292443799
POI liegt jetzt redundant vor.
bingo (2021-04-12 07:02:02+00:00): Your first changeset, congratulation :-)
I do not think, that the building has the name "The Mint Retreat" but the shop in the building. Maybe should add this tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbeauty
and btw the value for the addr:state key is FL uppercase
GOwin (2021-11-30 01:31:57+00:00): Hi Elp! It's awesome to see you, and your iCyC updating the bike-related facilities in Iloilo. Looking forward to more of your edits.

If you're keen to meet other OpenStreetMap contributors who are biking enthusiasts, check out the local community channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH
salvoconducto (2021-10-12 19:20:42+00:00): All the building footprints are garbage and getting replaced → https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112431889
eggie (2021-04-11 17:34:04+00:00): Dag wsmaal Het gebied van je edits is wel erg groot Het komt omdat je een wandelpad hebt vastgemaakt aan de landuse-residential van Roosendaal.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102748128

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-11 17:45:52+00:00): Hier is wel heel veel misgegaan. Ik zal nu wat proberen te herstellen. 
Wanneer een pad een ander pad kruist maak dan altijd een verbinding. Het zal anders niet routeren. Er loepen paden over elkaar heen. De duplikaten zal ik verwijderen.
gr eggie

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	2
warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part