piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mirecnet (2022-03-29 17:31:53+00:00): Nazdar,
ja som nic nemenil a neboj sa. Ja sa s tebou urcite hadat o takej blbosti nebudem :)
Je to vyasfaltovana velka plocha na existujucej ceste.

Otagovane by to malo byt takto:
amenity=parking
access=private
parking=surface
smoothness=excellent
surface=asphalt
source=survey, gps :)
marczoutendijk (2022-02-02 16:07:01+00:00): What does "afd" mean?
Please use good changeset comments!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
You have been blocked for not doing that, I block you again if you refrain from using them.
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
ivanbranco (2022-02-03 17:25:15+00:00): Hi marczoutendijk,

this user is a vandal. This is another account from this user: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5621

He's adding fictional mapping and curse words (such as here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24310618) quoting italian racist memes

Is possible to have all his changesets reverted please?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116912736
ivanbranco (2022-02-03 17:30:59+00:00): Also here there's a third account from the same person: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jackpot21
vonrockos (2022-02-02 15:46:08+00:00): Разве там отсутствует древесная растительность? Удалять реальные данные нельзя независимо от "восприятия". Прошу вернуть удаленные объекты.
Robert46798 (2022-02-03 21:53:24+00:00): Hallo JL_Kenner,

danke für deien Ergänzung! Ich habe mir deinen Änderungssatz angeschaut, weil du die entsprechnde Option beim Hochladen ausgewählt hattest.

Es ging noch ein Weg quer durch das Gebäude. Mit Blick auf das Luftbild denke ich, dass das so nicht der Realität entspricht. Ich habe den Weg schon mal angepasst.
Gerade sehe ich noch, dass das Gebäude in OSM nicht rechtwinklig ist. So weit ich das sehen kann ist es das aber. Hier kannst du im Editor einfach das Gebäude auswählen und einen Shortcut nutzen, um das Gebäude rechtwinklig zu machen. Bei dem von dir genutzen Editor (iD) müsste das [Q] sein. Das ist oft nützlich, wenn man Gebäude einträgt. Das habe ich jetzt noch nicht angepasst.

Viel Spaß beim Weitermappen,
Robert
L'imaginaire (2022-02-02 16:07:37+00:00): Ik heb even gekeken, maar de waarschuwingen lijken me geen verband te houden met het pad dat je toegevoegd hebt. Ik zie alleszins geen problemen met de busroutes die over de Diksmuidseweg lopen.

Het pad sloot aan zuidwestelijke kant wel nog niet netjes aan op de Ravestraat. Dat heb ik even aangepast.
Siel Nollet (2022-02-03 09:42:23+00:00): oei, bedankt om aan te passen!
ivanbranco (2022-02-12 10:15:07+00:00): Hi osm_saint-louis,

as I said you last time (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103053208) the proper tag for peaks is natural=*, not place=*

1.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9468613813
2.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9468613812
osm_saint-louis (2022-02-12 10:47:09+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,
As I noted the other day, correcting a minor clerical error would be the better way instead of sending such reproachful messages. I ask that you spare me from such messages in the future and silently make the correction of an obvious clerical error, which can happen in JOSM, yourself. This is how I imagine positive cooperation in OSM. Thank you.
Cordially
uli.l
ivanbranco (2022-02-12 11:04:10+00:00): As I said last time: "If I edit without commenting it's possible a user will keep making the same mistake over the time.", and that's exactly what happened, you kept making the same exact mistake. If I keep fixing them without telling you, you would keep doing it without even noticing it. Telling you about a repeated error and getting in response "Thank you, I hadn't noticed, I'll pay more attention." is how I imagine positive cooperation. So I will keep making you notice errors if I found out more (that's what changeset comments are also for).

EDIT: Nevermind, I just translated your user block: "Deine Haltung hat sich aber mit dem neuen frankophonen Account nicht verändert - nach wie vor echauffierst Du Dich, sobald jemand es wagt, Dich auf einen Fehler hinzuweisen.", unfortunately as I see your attitude is still the same.
osm_saint-louis (2022-02-12 11:50:11+00:00): Hello ivanbranco,
It seems that you are a bit of a right-winger and always look for the fault in others. Such qualities are not conducive to good cooperation. I ask you to spare me completely from your reports of little mistakes in future, to correct them yourself instead (tacitly!), and to practise your super-teacherly elsewhere, where it is more appreciated. I simply cannot stand this kind of thing, because it only leads to pointless discussions like this one, it does not create a good atmosphere, and it is counterproductive.
Sincerely
uli.l
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:06:50+00:00): Check out how to enter opening hours on the wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116913300
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:08:49+00:00): Also you show the state as Utah and the city as Orem yet the node is in Burien.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116913300
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-03 07:38:10+00:00): Note that https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines obligates you to link documentation page at OSM Wiki from your user profile

If you can, please notify your employer that they are obligated to follow https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
akuksouski_lyft (2022-02-03 09:49:57+00:00): Hi, Mateusz!

My name is Alexander and I am a mapper of the OSM Team at Lyft. We truly appreciate you paying attention to the lack of information on the Lyft mappers profiles. Thanks to your feedback, our mapping team has already added links from the user profiles to the Lyft OSM Wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lyft) together with the link to the Lyft GitHub page (https://github.com/OSM-DCT-Lyft/US) with all the information connected to the Lyft OSM editing we have today. Also we will definitely make further updates of our documentation in order to fully comply with the OSM community guidelines. I want to assure you that Lyft’s Mapping team takes OpenStreetMap rules seriously, and I hope we can prove our good intentions. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience.

Best regards, Alexander
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-10 12:36:29+00:00): Thank you so much for a quick reaction, it is really appreciated.

As usual with such things it is easy to miss something, so reaction to report that something goes wrong is more important and valuable that avoiding issues (as avoiding all problems is impossible).
bxl-forever (2022-02-03 11:25:31+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for updating the map.

I had to undo part of your changes because you erased a street.  I suppose this is not just empty space now, therefore I undeleted the former road and tagged it as highway=pedestrian.  It will show up for pedestrian routing and no more for vehicle routing.
If that is wrong, I will gladly hear about it.

I also fixed the bus route because your changes broke it too.

Have a nice day.
snyder19 (2022-02-03 19:19:50+00:00): Hello.
Sorry I am not used to editing maps. But your improvements are correct. Thank you :-)
Tomas Straupis (2022-02-02 14:55:20+00:00): Nuėmiau neteisingai pridėtas aeroway=hangar žymas ne oro uosto pastatams. Atstačiau neteisingai pakeistas žolės žymas. Atstačiau neteisingai pašalintą tourism=attraction žymą.
MarcoR (2022-02-02 21:13:58+00:00): Cerca di usare un commento specifico (non è obbligatorio ma aiuta chi eventualmente verificherà in futuro il tuo lavoro).
Buon mapping,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116914693
tux67 (2022-02-02 14:59:42+00:00): Hi,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorhome
now you exchanged the type of cars being sold with the access restriction:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorhome
I don't think this is what you wanted to do.

BR
tux67
Jorisbo (2022-02-02 16:43:56+00:00): Hi tux67 ! Thank you for the feedback. You are right, this is not the intended change. Do you have a sugestion? i cannot yet find a goof alternative. Kind regards Joris
tux67 (2022-02-02 17:30:05+00:00): taginfo shows a quite widely used approach with https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=caravan
However - if you want to see this rendered the previous approach with shop=car and car=whatever was not too bad ..
jeslop (2022-02-02 15:08:49+00:00): Saludos malozoya y bienvenido a OSM. Gracias por tus primeras aportaciones.
Echa un vistazo a esto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios y tenlo en cuenta para futuras ediciones.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
eggie (2022-02-02 14:33:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Het 'pad' is op recente luchtfoto's duidelijk te zien. 
Paden op prive grond krijgen de tag access=private mee. Dat hier ook het geval.
Paden die verwijderd worden zullen vaak door andere mappers weer worden ingetekend, maar dan zonder die accesstag. Het is daarom beter die paden op de kaart te laten staan. 

Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116915430

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-02 15:23:45+00:00): Reverted en van de juiste tags voorzien. Het pad zal niet meer routeren  (deed het eigenlijk al niet) en heeft geen verbinding met andere paden meer. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-02 14:47:55+00:00): Dag neBBreg

Dan dus 
vehicle=no  
horse=no  
traffic_sign=NL:C1

bicycle=yes (het onderbord) 

en evt foot=yes voor de duidelijkheid. 

En waarom... Bv paard en wagen? 
Nog even de link hoe te taggen bij de verschillende verkeersborden. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

Dan is het altijd correct
Mapse
eggie
mariotomo (2022-02-02 15:31:49+00:00): Microsoft proxy user, poor data quality. what do we do about it?
BrackoNe (2022-02-02 15:39:18+00:00): Hi, mariotomo,
Thank you for reaching us!
Please note that our editors manually investigate every changeset within 24 hours. If something is wrong, all changesets are either edited or reverted (depending on the severity of the issue).
Thank you,
Nemanja, on behalf of the Map builder team
mariotomo (2022-02-02 15:53:19+00:00): changeset comment could be more explicit, and proxy user page could provide a link to the organized edits page, and your team could try to keep the organized edits page a bit more up-to-date (the last edit was almost 11 months ago).
thanks for the prompt reply, hope you can use my feedback.
BrackoNe (2022-02-02 16:03:38+00:00): Hi, thanks again for your time!

As you know, a changeset comment is left by the user. However, we are working on it, and once we introduce new features in our Map builder, comments will provide a more accurate description.

I will contact the relevant team to check the organized edits page and apply any changes if necessary.

We would like to emphasize that the Map builder project is still experimental, and we are trying to learn the best practices here, so any of your feedback is very valuable to us!

Thank you,
Nemanja
mariotomo (2022-02-02 16:08:33+00:00): about the changeset comment: your user is shielded by your software, so their comment could easily be put in a template making sure that the final changeset comment clarifies to us reviewers that this contribution came through a software, and that feedback should be provided to a team, not to the (possibly absolute beginner) providing the information.  something like: "#MSFT - original comment: …"
BrackoNe (2022-02-02 16:24:17+00:00): Thanks for this comment!

Please note that none of these edits are made by our editorial team. Microsoft reserved #MSFT (deprecated) and #MSFTOpenMaps hashtags for the editorial team. However, that doesn't mean that we can't introduce a new hashtag.

If you look for the #MapBuilder hashtag, you may notice changeset fixes performed by our editorial team over the original Map builder changesets.

Bing's visitors make all edits. We are trying to improve OSM reach.

Anyways, I have noted your comment.

Thanks,
Nemanja
user_3716049 (2023-12-16 19:31:52+00:00): Betr. : landuse construction "Hoppelkamp"

Hi Tux,
hast du Info's dazu was da geplant ist. Auf den Webseiten der Stadt (1) & (2) kann ich noch nichts dazu finden. Weshalb ich das eher als brownfield taggen würde, weil es da wohl frühstens 2025 was zu überarbeiten gibt.

Andererseits, ein Vergleich von vDOP mit NRW Ortho zu folge scheinen da schon Erschließungsarbeiten statt zu finden.

(1) https://geoportal.moenchengladbach.de/geo/resources/apps/Dezernat_VI_Stadt_im_Wandel/index.html?lang=de

(2) https://ris-moenchengladbach.itk-rheinland.de/sessionnetmglbi/vo0040.asp
tux67 (2023-12-17 14:36:21+00:00): Also wenn man sich die vergebenen Hausnummern anschaut, die DOPs und vDOPS und versehentlich die Bauaktivitäten die man bei Str**tview sieht zu Kenntnis nimmt, dann würde ich sagen .. Neubau  eines Wohngebietes.
user_3716049 (2024-01-13 18:18:32+00:00): Ich hab's mir mal vorort angeehen. Da sieht es noch genau so aus wie auf dem vDOP, da tut sich zurzeit nichts.
Aber da liegt wohl doch von Privat aktuell ein Bebauungsplan vor.
Bebauungspläne die unter §34 fallen, trägt die Stadt aber nur hier ein  :

https://geoportal.moenchengladbach.de/geo/resources/apps/MG_plus/index.html?lang=de
tux67 (2024-01-14 07:52:37+00:00): ok, hab's mal angepasst
abakus_uploader (2022-02-02 23:31:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
HaPe-CZ (2022-02-02 16:26:46+00:00): This path does not exist. See BING, PNOA, MAXAR - note on map
who_i_am (2022-02-02 15:07:11+00:00): 文明路
dadavid (2022-02-08 15:24:06+00:00): Dieser Kreisel scheint tatsächlich "Obermühle" zu heißen. Ist "Sempach-Kreisel" vlt der loc_name?
Quelle:
https://www.jauslinstebler.ch/VI/SB/projekte/n02-anschluss-sempach.html

Außerdem sind durch das Verschieben einige "Knicks" in der Straßengeometrie entstanden, die habe ich noch geradegezogen.
dadavid (2022-02-08 15:07:56+00:00): Der Kreisel hier scheint offiziell tatsächlich "Münster-Vorstadt" zu heißen. (https://www.luzernerzeitung.ch/zentralschweiz/luzern/surseer-kreisel-kuenstler-enthuellt-neustes-werk-ld.1141956)
Der Namensbestandteil "-Kreisel" ist eigentlich nicht nötig, da er durch das Tagging junction=roundabout impliziert wird
maciek-szn (2022-02-02 17:48:50+00:00): Na rondach nie dodaje się oneway=yes, bo z samego charakteru ronda wynika, że drogi je tworzące są jednokierunkowe. Sprecyzuj, jakie dostrzegasz problemy z liniami autobusowymi, bo mi żadne nie wpadły w oko.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116918952
Marwis00 (2022-03-08 08:00:02+00:00): Opóźnienia na budowie drogi, że słupy w pasie S7 jeszcze nie zdemontowane?
syntex (2022-03-08 09:27:06+00:00): Poprawiałem na podstawie przelotu dronem miesiąc temu, może już je zdemontowali
eggie (2022-02-02 16:04:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
literan (2022-02-03 16:30:27+00:00): Добрый день. OSM не предназначен для хранения исторической информации

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway:
"Overall, mapping such features is acceptable where some remains like embankments, remains of bridges, etc., remain, even if rails are gone. In locations where the railway has been replaced by new buildings and roads, the mapping of such features becomes out of scope for OpenStreetMap. Historical mapping can occur on Open Historical Map."
Leo Slager (2022-02-02 19:04:19+00:00): Hi Diana,
Please do not use default.
Use maxheight:signed=no in stead.
eggie (2022-02-02 18:17:34+00:00): Zo te zien zijn hier geen aanliggende fietspaden
cycleway=track  (aanliggende fietspaden) maar wel cycleway=shared_lane (fietssuggestiestrook.)

Mocht er een een fietsje op de rode stroken staan dan taggen we cycleway=lane

Ik draai je wijziging terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-02 18:18:27+00:00): Helaas map je hier door en kan ik het niet terugdraaien.
Ik zal het manueel weer veranderen.
eggie (2022-02-02 18:20:01+00:00): Aangepast... Svp geen fietspaden toevoegen die er niet zijn.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust. 
MVG
eggie
Diana_Wildschut (2022-02-02 18:27:31+00:00): versta je onder fietspaden alleen die met een fietsje erop? Deze zijn rood aan beide kanten van een zwarte weg, met onderbroken strepen. Voortaan niet taggen als fietspad?
eggie (2022-02-02 18:33:22+00:00): Nee... Wanneer er een fietsje op staat dan tag je
cycleway=lane  Fietsstrook
Dat heeft een wettelijke status.
Wanneer er geen fietsje op staat dan is het een fietssuggestiestrook.
cycleway=shared_lane
Dat wordt gebruikt om de weg optisch smaller te laten lijken.
Geen wettelijke status.
Een cycleway=track is een langsliggens fietspad met bv een G11 bord. Meestal iets verhoogd van de weg dmv een stoeprand.
eggie (2022-02-02 18:35:05+00:00): Wat leesvoer :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway#Fietsstroken_2
eggie (2022-02-02 18:36:18+00:00): En nog wat leesvoer over losliggende fietspaden..
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

Mapse verder
eggie
eggie (2022-02-02 18:54:10+00:00): en cycleway=track   
Gescheiden door een randje stoep e.d. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dtrack
Diana_Wildschut (2022-02-02 19:40:26+00:00): ah, duidelijk, dank voor het leesvoer!
user_5359 (2022-02-04 08:10:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the OPGW=24 (see https://www.osm.org/way/279317368)
eggie (2022-02-02 18:22:35+00:00): Wederom heb ik het teruggedraaid.  Hier zijn geen fietspaden.
gr eggie
eggie (2022-02-02 18:42:51+00:00): Deze wiki is ook wel duidelijk
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fietsstrook#Fietssuggestiestrook_in_Nederland
Lokai (2022-02-06 05:26:03+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei  OSM.
Bei diesem CS hast du die Hausnummer Hausnummer zwei mal vergeben. Das gesamte Gebäude trägt nun den Namen Notar.

Schau dir die andernen POIs in der Umgebung an, wie es das Büro getaggt wird.

Gruß

L
Vinber-Pro (2022-02-03 07:09:07+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour les ajouts sur les terrains de sports :)

j'ai retiré operator et lit sur la barrière, qui ne me semble une erreur ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/952925050/history

Erreur sans gravité évidemment

Bienvenue
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116920634
Enock4seth (2022-02-04 11:30:09+00:00): Thanks for mapping, use title case for street names i.e. "Dzah Street" not "DZAH STREET" see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Uppercase_characters and do not add "addr:city=*" tag to streets. 

Glad to see street names being mapped in Ho. Keep it up  \o/
Lokai (2022-02-06 05:40:33+00:00): Bei diesem CS hat du die Nutzung der Gebäude korrigiert. Vorher waren die Umrisse rechtwinklig, das war wahrscheinlich korrekt. Nun sind die Gebäudeumrisse schief und sind baulich voneinender fast getrennt.
joost schouppe (2022-02-03 08:38:08+00:00): Merci Ivan :)
ma-rt-in (2022-02-08 17:59:44+00:00): Hallo,

auf welcher Grundlage hast du hier maxspeed angepasst? Leider hast du kein Kommentar hinterlegt und auch sonst keine Angaben gemacht.

vg
Raa39 (2022-02-08 18:05:16+00:00): Ремонт дороги скорее всего. Я уже не помню.
map per (2022-12-31 07:27:10+00:00): Hallo hiierundda,

dieser Parkplatz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953220080/history) fällt in die Kathegorie parking=surface und sollte nicht mit parking=street_side getagged werden (vgl. (1)). Habs korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking
archpdx (2022-02-02 16:45:21+00:00): Please don't add golf features to render the Ferrari logo:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116922008
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-03 11:16:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116957951 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for fantasy mapping
Metasoft™ (2022-02-04 09:07:02+00:00): this was a huge error on my part i explained to andy townsend. a im so sorry , we are 1:1 metaverse developers   we love you guys and the data integrity is vital to our process.  please accept my sincerest apologies.  I will train all my contractors on your rules. ASAP
archpdx (2022-02-05 05:33:29+00:00): I accept your apology. I can see that your edits are in good faith.

It sounds like you have paid contractors that are editing the map. If so, that's perfectly fine, but we require that you comply with OpenStreetMap's organized editing guide:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

One of the important things is documenting what you're doing and what user(s) are involved on the wiki. Please confirm that you understand this request. Thanks!
Metasoft™ (2022-02-05 14:39:03+00:00): updated on the wiki.  alaong with my pt contractor andy / Majorfalcon
Thank you

Brad
dieterdreist (2022-02-15 22:48:48+00:00): mi sembra qui è stato cancellato il nome del luogo, Caserma Piave, senza sostituzione su un altro oggetto. Non conosco la situazione, ma da una breve ricerca in rete mi risulta una caserma di questo nome qui.

Ciao,
Martin
user_5359 (2022-02-03 10:13:06+00:00): Hello! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel!
Lokai (2022-02-06 05:33:40+00:00): Hallo,

bei diesem CS hast du wahrscheinlich etwas übersehen, schau bitte noch mal drüber. addr:housename ?
Lokai (2022-02-10 18:45:35+00:00): Keine Rückmeldung -> Änderungen vorgenommen zu POI, Umriss, housename
rene78 (2022-04-01 19:29:56+00:00): It's a zip line.
http://xline.xdubai.com/
maciek-szn (2022-02-02 17:56:48+00:00): Poprawiłem to, bo wyglądało to tak, jakby lewoskręt z Niemcewicza w Kadłubka odbywał się poza rondem.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116923496
d3mol3k (2022-02-02 18:21:16+00:00): @maciek-szn - po to tam dałem nakaz jazdy prosto bo w sumie to tak wygląda żeby tak skręcić to to mini rondo trzeba objechać dookoła wjechac kawalontek w niemcewicza i od razu skręcić w Kadłubka - dlatego lepiej by to wyglądało jakby tam rozrysować można było normalne rondo - wszak jego średnica to 16 metrów - zewnętrzna ;)
d3mol3k (2022-02-02 18:22:15+00:00): ale ok nawet wygląda to w miarę sensownie. ciekawe co mi powie nawi - skręć w lewo w Błogosławionego Wincentego Kadłubka :D
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 22:17:22+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118796464
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-06 08:34:35+00:00): If this road is actually named after Salazar - then please add road name to the road itself, not just node within road (only if you know exact name and extent)