piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2022-08-11 09:02:36+00:00): How many Spago’s in this street?  

There is another one next door, is that the same?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3261814416
RaphaelPasloin_mobile (2022-08-12 09:25:17+00:00): It s the same
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
abakus_uploader (2022-08-10 22:30:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-08-24 20:51:27+00:00): We thank you for your contributions to improving the map of Saudi Arabia, and I ask you not to delete the highway=track because they are important desert roads for us in Saudi Arabia, and they were not placed randomly, and this change was reversed. Thank you and greetings.
rskedgell (2023-01-19 18:19:40+00:00): Hi,

This appears to be part of an organised edit. Please could you give the OSM mapping community some information about #waymap-project-SB by adding an entry to the Organised Editing/Activities page at

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities

It might also have been beneficial for you and your team to read and follow the Organised Editing Guidelines.

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
then upd
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
user_6110846 (2022-08-10 09:38:56+00:00): бічна лугова це результат виправлення назви вулиці
user_5359 (2022-08-12 08:54:35+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9944582407 (one of three hundert seventy eight objects).
What is the meaning of the foreign tags?
Type_of_th = classroom teacher_s_room store
_submiss_7 = Shree Aa. Bi. Lamidamar, Phoolbari
altitude = 297.38483629
latitude = 27.2207127
longitude = 85.7353375
precision = 4.956
You didn't need latitude, longitude as OSM data because this a information from the node himself.
MarcoR (2022-08-10 12:50:58+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o!

Grazie per i tuoi contributi.
Sia l'alimentari che la farmacia hai scritto che si trovano in "Via Giacomo Matteotti" ma, se non sbaglio, su OpenStreetMap questa via non è ancora presente; se sai dove si trova, ti andrebbe di aggiungerla?

Grazie e buon mapping!

Marco
4004 (2022-08-14 23:04:43+00:00): здравствуйте, Олег, спасибо за правку.
вижу, вы нашли тег description- то, что вы написали в name туда как раз подходит. name - имя собственное, не описание обьекта
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
eggie (2022-08-10 13:43:14+00:00): Hi TU  Seems okay to me.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-08-10 13:31:38+00:00): Beste Mattbeedham  Het lijkt erop dat je adresnodes hebt samengevoegd?
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124723280

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-10 13:38:35+00:00): Reverted by changeset #124732530
All addressnodes are import from the Dutch Registry (Kadaster)

If an addressnode is at the wrong spot you mau correct this. Bus please don't  merge the nodes.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-08-10 13:39:08+00:00): typo You may correct.. but don't combine
fabiotofy (2022-08-10 10:33:58+00:00): ciao, che tag è contact:housenumber ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124723285
Andrea Musuruane (2022-08-10 10:46:47+00:00): E' un tag usato nel Bremen Schema per evitare di avere numeri civici duplicati sui POI, dato che in Italia il numero civico e' sempre sull'accesso. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124723285
fabiotofy (2022-08-10 10:53:29+00:00): ok grazie, non lo conoscevo e non l'avevo mai visto usare. ciao ciao
eggie (2022-08-10 13:34:07+00:00): Dag Matt  Alel gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG (Kadster) en zodag precies ingemeten. Je kunt niet een luchtfoto gebruiken om gebouwen aan  te passen. het lijkt me beter je wijzigingen terug te draaien.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124723371
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-10 13:36:04+00:00): reverted by changeset #124732430

All buildings are import from the Dutch registry..
Please don't change the building shapes.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-08-10 14:24:34+00:00): The aerial imagery is not a 90 degree picture..  So never use an aerial imagery to correct a buildingshape.. The roof is not ground level.
aceman444 (2022-11-14 00:02:29+00:00): Hi, so if this a private company, or is it the office of a consulate of Republic of Italy to Mexico? The tagging is ambiguous and wrong.
dorymoving (2022-11-14 01:45:47+00:00): Ciao, confermo che questo posto è il CONSOLATO ITALIANO di PLAYA DEL CARMEN, ci sono stato personalmente per un documento da mandare in Italia. Nei tagging di OsmAnd~ 4.1.11, non c'è, oppure è tradotta male, la parola "Consolato". NON potevo mettere "Ambasciata" perchè in effetti non lo è!

Sistemi tu il tag?
aceman444 (2022-11-14 07:15:14+00:00): Thank you! The consulate is listed at https://ambcittadelmessico.esteri.it/ambasciata_cittadelmessico/es/ambasciata/la_rete_consolare . I have now fixed the tagging so it should display as a honorary consulate.
dorymoving (2022-11-15 04:41:36+00:00): Ottimo! Ti ringrazio e buon lavoro 🙏🏼
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
GerdP (2022-08-10 10:27:55+00:00): source ist Bing; Mapbox Satellite
RicoElectrico (2022-08-11 09:46:42+00:00): Cześć, w temacie ratownictwa - jeśli znasz jakieś defibrylatory AED w Twojej okolicy, to będę wdzięczny za dodanie ich przez naszą mapkę: https://aed.openstreetmap.org.pl/

Pozdrawiam!
eggie (2022-08-10 12:07:13+00:00): name=Speeltuin heb ik verwijderd. Dat hoort niet op de kaart. De speeltuin was al gemapt op een node met leisure=playground
Je ziet best lastig om het gelijk goed te doen.
eggie
wermak (2023-06-17 07:59:55+00:00): Hallo Lennart,
hier gibt es wohl keine Baustelle mehr, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3713755.
Willst du das maxspeed wieder korrigieren.
Schöne Grüße
LennartNB (2023-06-17 08:29:21+00:00): Ich bin dort in letzter Zeit nicht mehr vorbeigefahren. Laut VMZ-Niedersachsen gibt es wohl noch bis zum 15.07.2023 die Baustelle. In der HAZ wird ebenfalls die Baustelle zwischen Hildesheim-Drispenstedt und Hannover-Süd erwähnt: https://www.haz.de/lokales/hannover/so-war-die-verkehrslage-in-der-region-hannover-am-freitag-16-06-2023-CM3KHXCOENA4HE627JIY7A36QQ.html
LennartNB (2023-06-17 09:45:55+00:00): Die Baustelle ist anscheinend in Richtung Norden nicht mehr vorhanden. maxspeed ist für diese Fahrbahn wieder auf none gesetzt. Richtung Süden ist die Baustelle wohl noch vorhanden.
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
ssundell (2022-08-30 20:32:30+00:00): Moi! Tuon private-tagin sijaan ehkä ennemmin muuttaisin noiden teiden tyyppiä. En tunne aluetta, mutta yhtäkkiä näyttäisi, että tuo pohjoisempi pätkä ei ole Hevonojantietä lainkaan vaan pihatie, ts. highway=service ja service=driveway. Samat tagit laittaisin myös tuolle eteläiselle private-pätkälle.

Jos lisää katselen, niin ylipäätään tämä Hevonojantien eteläinen osa, joka on tyyppiä unclassified, on siis nyt OSM:n luokittelussa ikään kuin suurempi tie kuin tuo pohjoinen osa, joka on residential. Jos oikein villiksi heittäytyisin, saattaisin muuttaa tieosuuden tuosta private-risteyksestä eteläänpäin service-tyyppiseksi, koska se on kuitenkin vain yhteen taloon vievä tieosuus.
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
Ygramul (2022-08-14 22:07:57+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Keep in mind, though, that this is a map for everyone, not a place to advertise your business. I've thus removed the description from the POI again.

I've also corrected the address and opening hours to be in line with how those should be tagged in OSM and moved the POI to (hopefully) the correct building.
rskedgell (2023-01-17 08:22:56+00:00): Drawing a decorative sidewalk around a block is usually detrimental to pedestrian routing.
cytryn (2022-08-17 20:31:10+00:00): Cześć,
Czemu skasowałeś liniowo zmapowane bramy?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017801973
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017801977
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017801980
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017801947
Nie wszystkie wprawdzie na tym obszarze, więc być może omyłkowo?
syntex (2022-08-17 20:58:16+00:00): Jestem przeciwny ich mapowaniu w takiej formie. Nie daje to zupełnie nic, a utrudnia mapowanie płotów.
cytryn (2022-08-18 11:22:50+00:00): Ok, rozumiem. Zgadzam się, że utrudnia mapowanie płotów - no nie ma lekko ;) Co do użyteczności lub jej braku, to nie podejmuję się oceny - na mapach do celów projektowych jednak z jakiegoś powodu się je wrysowuje.
Niezależnie jednak od tego jest to stosowana praktyka, w dodatku ze statusem "approved", więc mapowanie jest technicznie poprawne, dlatego kasowanie takich obiektów IMO zubaża jednak nieco mapę ze szczegółów.
syntex (2022-08-18 14:16:18+00:00): Dla mnie punkt jest całkowicie wystarczający. Poprawianie jakichkolwiek obszarów, gdy ktoś już dodał zarówno płoty i bramy w formie linii, a nie poprawił zagospodarowania terenu to koszmar. A OSM to nie jest mapa do celów projektowych : P
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
czubi (2022-08-10 17:44:47+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM.
Mal einige Sachen zur Erklärung weil die am Anfang gerne falsch gemacht werden. footway bitte nur nehmen wenn es ein ausgezeichneter Fußweg, also mit VZ:239 ist oder er als Fußweg parallel an einer Straße geht. Wenn du es sonst als footway ausgezeichnet ist ist, ist Radfahren verboten und ein restriktiver Router wird das auch beachten. Sonst nimm bitte path.
czubi (2022-08-10 17:52:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085314595
Wichtig!: Weg müssen mit andern Wegen verbunden sein, es ist nicht sinnvoll Wege an landuse-Grenzen (hier am Parkplatz) enden zu lassen oder sie mit ihnen zu verkleben. Ich ändere das mal.
HerrMüller (2022-08-10 18:50:38+00:00): Danke für die Tipps. Wenn der Fußweg aber am Parkplatz endet? Soll ich den path dann über den Parkplatz zum nächsten Weg führen?
czubi (2022-08-10 18:55:54+00:00): Genau, ich habs mal bei beiden Parkplätzen gemacht, einfach mal schauen wenn du magst. Wenn du Fragen hast helfe ich gern.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-12 21:16:21+00:00): Hvorfor tagger du så mange veje med access=no?

fx:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013526083
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:19:52+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:19:49+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:19:47+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:19:45+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:19:42+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:19:39+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:43+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:41+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
aceman444 (2025-07-29 15:14:43+00:00): Ste si isty, ze https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8595816232 je vjazd do parkoviska? Akeho? Podzemneho a s akym pristupom? Lebo tam je hned autoservis, takze ak je na dome brana, moze to byt len vjazd do servisu, ziadne parkovisko. boli te tam? Lebo neuvadzate ziadne zdroje (len Ortofoto, kde to nie je vidiet).
priean (2025-07-30 06:48:19+00:00): Skôr by som povedal, že ten servis tam už nie je
aceman444 (2025-08-20 21:05:24+00:00): Otazka cie miesto servisu zrazu moze byt v dome parkovisko. No treba to tam preverit.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:37+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:35+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:32+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:30+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:28+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:24+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:21+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
Filip009 (2022-09-18 14:15:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085322083
Ako je tento potok vedený pod zemou? Pokiaľ rúrou, tak tam chýba tag tunnel=culvelt.
Mirecnet (2022-09-18 22:43:46+00:00): Nazdar,
opravil som aj dalsich par veci. Snazim sa podrobne zmapovat najdlhsiu dolinu SR: Zmien su tisicky a tak ak najdes chybu, tak mi napis.
Ked som to o 00:30 chcel ulozit, tak sa nedalo. Hadam poslalo. Neviem ci je na OSM daky ddos utok :)
This website is under heavy load (queue full)
We're sorry, too many people are accessing this website at the same time. We're working on this problem. Please try again later.
Filip009 (2022-09-19 05:56:54+00:00): Podarilo sa ti to uploadnúť. Vidím, že si to skopíroval z komentára čo som poslal aj s bodkou a všimol som si aj, že som to napísal zle. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert
Mirecnet (2022-09-20 18:48:37+00:00): To je hadica, nie ziadny tunel :)
Tak je to uz hadam dobre. Snazim sa tam znova dostat, ale stale prsi ...
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].