piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-05-06 12:22:04+00:00): Hi. Again, but now on mapped content.
I will be short. When you did read the requirements you should save a lot of mapping time. 
When you think an object is a building, take a close look for a shadow what is proof that it is above ground level and mostly a building. I t can be strait or roundish when it is a round hut. You mapped a few objects which are rocks. look for  the irregularity .
And important. Be sure rectangular buildings are proper squared with the Q key in the editor
Please correct also the issues which are shown in the error triangle on the right hand menu.
Anyhow, perhaps a bad start, but be welcome and keep mapping.
cc @Frans S
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84721711
ralley (2020-05-06 00:59:19+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  One thing, please don't use the name field for descriptions like "Batting cage", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84721888
Glassman (2020-05-07 02:35:26+00:00): Tip: To add a business that is one of many in a building, just add a node for the business. If the business is the only one in the building, then add the business to the building outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84721926
Glassman (2020-05-07 02:55:06+00:00): TIP: Square buildings by selecting the outline, then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84721980
MikeN (2020-05-06 02:21:49+00:00): Please save / upload before moving to a new area to avoid creating a changeset that spans multiple states.
Mark R Naird (2020-05-07 22:06:57+00:00): May you please be so kind to invent a new tag for your "residential blocks"? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161706482 has had bad tracing quality, but was appropriate for low-resolution maps.
user_5173844 (2020-05-08 11:13:54+00:00): Thank you for your comment. Residential areas are now tagged correctly. Previously they included vast swatches of land that were not residential in any way. Please let me know if you have noticed any specific mistakes, I'll happily correct them.
For tagging the village boundaries instead of landuse=* please use place=village and boundary=administrative tags.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-05-19 00:11:50+00:00): Essa via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800569180/history que voce criou nao parece existir...
Glassman (2020-05-06 02:47:05+00:00): nice edits - great detail
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84723045
pdxrider (2020-05-15 03:04:29+00:00): Do you still need the building tags on the sports pitches? It isn't appropriate for them to have building tags if they're not buildings.
FlyingFaller (2020-05-15 06:36:18+00:00): Unfortunately yes...my server host hasn't updated the world yet. I will go bug him again right now. If this is causing problems, let me know and I can fix the tags ASAP.

JORDAN!!!!!!!!!!!
pdxrider (2020-05-15 19:41:51+00:00): If you're still working on it, that's fine, but ideally you should get it done soon. When you're done I have a tool that can revert this set of edits with one go so you shouldn't have to worry about it. Let me know on here when you're done.
FlyingFaller (2020-05-17 22:25:12+00:00): Done! Server is back online with the changes, feel free to revert to the correct tags. Thank you.
Glassman (2020-05-17 23:36:43+00:00): Since you made the edit, you should be the one to correct the tags.
FlyingFaller (2020-05-18 00:05:16+00:00): The tags were correct in a previous edit I made, roadgeek99 has offered to revert those edits with tools I don't possess. I will let them do it.
Glassman (2020-05-20 15:23:12+00:00): I reverted your edit. Only verifiable features should be mapped.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84723045
Joseph E (2020-10-11 07:00:10+00:00): Seaside83,
I see you tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800570757 (McGaugh Slough) as a tidal channel. Is Clear Lake tidal? I thought only seas and Great Lakes have tides. A tidal channel is "A natural intertidal waterway in mangroves, salt marshes and tidal flats with water flow in the direction of the tide” - does the water flow in this slough reverse direction twice a day?
bikingaround244 (2022-03-04 18:02:43+00:00): I changed this to cycle and foot path. if you look at bicycle trails on MassMapper (https://maps.massgis.digital.mass.gov/MassMapper/MassMapper.html). It has this marked as an existing bicycle trail hence biking. At one point this bridge was closed for renovation (https://www.mass.gov/service-details/arthur-fiedler-footbridge-renovation-project) and bikes had to be re routted a different way but that is no longer the case and this bridge is open for bikes to use.
Glassman (2020-05-07 02:37:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84724387
Glassman (2020-05-07 02:46:48+00:00): The house you added is the size of dozens of houses. If you intended to show landuse, use the landuse=residential. Otherwise draw the house according to the imagery. I fixed it. Also we don't use descriptive names. The tags, like building=house, are sufficient.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84724781
Glassman (2020-05-07 02:39:40+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84726717
DP24PH (2020-05-06 06:46:39+00:00): It seems that you forgot the La Union in the bracketed part. Kindly double-check the location before uploading/updating.
user_5359 (2020-05-06 15:42:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of highway type  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway)
TrbldWtr (2020-05-07 00:50:31+00:00): I made some changes, I hope that is what you meant?
Glassman (2020-05-07 02:40:52+00:00): It looks like you added a building within another building. Change the Sushi Mo to a node and place it towards the entrance of the restaurant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84727773
Владимир К (2020-06-04 17:40:36+00:00): Приветствую!
Не нужно добавлять таких имен.
Денис39 (2020-06-05 05:50:05+00:00): Добрый день Владимир. Хорошо.
Первый блин комом, как говориться.
Владимир К (2020-06-05 08:31:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия   
вот здесь можно подробнее про названия узнать
Glassman (2020-05-07 14:17:52+00:00): Tip: draw in the entire building. Use a node for the business if there a multiple businesses in the building, placing the node near the entrance.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84728396
Glassman (2020-05-07 02:41:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84728449
Stalker61 (2020-05-08 14:49:08+00:00): У вас какие то проблемы?
Stalker61 (2020-05-08 14:55:40+00:00): У вас какие то проблемы?
iWowik (2020-05-11 08:34:13+00:00): Думаю, что просто сразу не было на главной странице видно свеженарисованного
Stalker61 (2020-05-11 16:14:07+00:00): Да нет. Он по верху второй раз контуры дублем набивает, правда с другой адреской, и требует нанести на неведомые карты.
Stalker61 (2020-05-08 14:55:24+00:00): У вас какие то проблемы?
Stalker61 (2020-05-08 14:55:06+00:00): У вас какие то проблемы?
mariotomo (2021-08-11 20:07:49+00:00): hi, I understand you're a beginner, so my question isn't to you making beginner's mistakes but to who's in charge of #teachosm-project-842. can you get them in contact with some local mapper?
kartler175 (2020-05-11 09:22:00+00:00): Der name-key ist für Eigennamen reserviert, er dient nicht dazu, beliebige Beschriftungen auf der gerenderten Karte zu erzwingen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names).
tracktype=1 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype#tracktype.3Dgrade1) und surface=gravel (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface) widersprechen sich. Auch sind hier die grade1-Tracks nach Luftbild nicht als solche zu erkennen.
highway=footway ist fur gewidmete Fußgängerwege gedacht (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway) gedacht. Ist das für die Wege hier zutreffend?
jleedev (2020-07-22 16:13:23+00:00): From the wiki: "This area should envelop the full grounds of the school including all the buildings, sports facilities and grounds." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Glassman (2020-05-07 14:22:36+00:00): It looks like you acidentally dragged a node, just east of the stop sign when working on West 14th Ave. It is easy to do, but can mess up routers. I went ahead and fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84732120
Kovoschiz (2021-08-21 07:42:12+00:00): How is this `access=private`?
user_5359 (2020-05-06 15:38:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. Residential is a description not a name.
majkaz (2020-05-06 09:07:44+00:00): Ahoj, tohle bude blbě otagované. Jednak snad u nás nejsou typy budov v mapě přísně vzato určené jejich užitím, ale vzhledem, v jakém byly postavené. Tj. kostel zůstává typem budovy kostel i při skutečném užívání například pro bydlení.
Když to pominu, tak "data centre" je jednoznačně špatná hodnota. Když už, tak je to téměř nezdokumentovaná a nevyužívaná hodnota "data_center".

Osobně bych tam značila spíš samostatně firmu, než budovu.
Flurps (2020-06-13 19:02:40+00:00): Hi there,
Thanks for the recent changes in the area. Just reviewing things now as a local.
This change also includes two 'new' service roads connecting completely different parts of suburbs near the Steurhof train station.
These are completely incorrect and need to be removed and the adjoining bits restored. One is a footpath and the other just does not exist at all.
Please feel free to shout in my direction, or request a review if you are unsure of something!
Regards,
Taranaki34 (2020-06-15 20:16:54+00:00): Hi Flurps, thank you for reaching out to me about this. 
I looked back through this changeset for the service ways you were referring to and I’m having a hard time finding the specific roads you are suggesting don’t exist. 
Can you send me the feature IDs for these please? Thank you!
Flurps (2020-06-28 23:17:13+00:00): Hey again Taranaki,
Sorry -- Only getting around to things now!

The serviceway which shouldn't be there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800615656
The residentail underpass which is just a pedestrian way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800615660

I've also noticed you tagging a lot of ways as residential roads in Cape Town, when they are private residential driveways or general serviceways. (The chances of needing to map 'new' residential maps in the suburbs is very low, and most other stuff is private)

Thanks for being receptive :)
Taranaki34 (2020-06-30 19:58:24+00:00): Hi Flurps,
Thank you for the clarifications. I've removed the service road tunnel under the railway platform and I have updated the residential underpass to a pedestrian way https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87364925.
eggie (2020-05-06 06:44:45+00:00): Yep.. volgens mij correct nu  :)
Mapse,
Eggie
Flurps (2020-06-29 15:36:34+00:00): This change damages relations and the 'alignment' is worse than the previous version.

Please use a better set of images for adjusting roads. MAXAR is terrible in most of Africa. We have local City of Cape Town maps which are STRONGLY recommended, or ESRI which are good too.

Rating: D
WyandotteCaves (2020-06-30 21:01:09+00:00): Hi Flurps,
Thank you for notifying me about this. I have re-aligned this area using City of Cape Town 2018 Aerial  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87366581.
andygol (2020-05-10 18:14:30+00:00): Your edits were reverted in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84981917
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84735701
User6 - Lightcyphers (2020-05-15 17:37:37+00:00): Hi,
Could you please let us know, what exactly Hi,
Could you please let us know, what exactly have been done wrong in this changeset?
Each detail provided by you will be highly appreciated.
Thank you!
DP24PH (2020-05-06 07:03:50+00:00): Change log:
1. Arrowhead got changed from '->' to '→'.
2. Conversion of PH-65/Pala-Pala Road in front of Asia Medic Family Hospital and Medical Center into solo carriageway (no traffic island near Pala-Pala Bridge).
3. Conversion of Asia Medic Family Hospital and Medical Center, and SM City Dasmariñas buildings (Main, Annex, Carpark) into multipolygon relations.
4. Recalibration of SM Dasmariñas → General Mariano Alvarez and Tagaytay into EB PH-65/Gov. Juanito R. Remulla, Sr. Road/Governor's Drive for easier commuting directions on most mobile apps.
5. Most Bus and PUV routes that go thru Walter Mart Dasmariñas Interchange got into solo 'stop' and 'platform' roles

Definition of terms:
SMD = SM Dasmariñas
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-05-09 00:24:23+00:00): Hmm, I don't think you add the "Interchange" suffix on some stop/terminal where you can transfer to another mode of transportation, unless they're posted. I think you rename the Robinsons Place Dasmariñas terminal as "Palapala Terminal" (ad they're called on route names on UV Express and PUJs). I've removed the "Interchange" suffix on most stops you've edited.
DP24PH (2020-05-09 01:52:37+00:00): That's right. Most Filipinos, in case of transfer to another mode, are used to the term "Terminal" vs. Singaporean "Interchange".
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-05-09 12:01:48+00:00): Fine to me, but I'm all wondering about why you're using  British spellings/word choices on some changeset comments and edited features.
DP24PH (2020-05-19 13:39:53+00:00): Here's the partial and official response from the Frequently Asked Questions:

"As you have noticed, I do self-learning on most of British spellings and terminologies while on contribution as a way of training (just in case of going thru vacation once again)."
Warin61 (2020-05-07 07:00:05+00:00): Way 800624999 has shared segments... that is an error.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.31640&lat=-38.27728&zoom=15
nevw (2020-05-06 07:46:10+00:00): Hi, you need to add a primary tag such as office=lawyer to the business.
Also don’t abbreviate the street name in osm.
rskedgell (2020-05-06 16:33:30+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing to the map.

Where you have mapped the buildings on Beauchamp Place, building=yes is fine, although building=terrace might be better (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace ),

Tagging the buildings as shop=yes is less useful, as this implies that the two terraces are single shops, which is not the case. The few shops which have been mapped so far have been mapped as POIs/nodes. If Beauchamp Place is mostly shops, restaurants, etc. it could be worth adding a landuse=retail polygon around the buildings (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dretail ).
Nakaner-repair (2020-05-08 10:17:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84886099 where the changeset comment is: Revert low quality Amazon Logistics edit. The light rail track is in a tunnel, a railway crossing is not necessary, didn't you notice that?
puppalg (2020-05-08 11:48:16+00:00): Thank you for checking into our edits. it is completely my mistake to ignore the layer and connect the road. I will make sure that my future edits will be reflecting high attention to every single detail and follow the editing etiquette. I will take this as a learning from the community. once again, thank you for improvising our edits. always happy to learn from the community.

Regards
puppalg
azsr (2020-05-07 21:02:52+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing. I'm not too sure that access=private is appropriate here as it's an industrial complex, which generally does not have access controls. I'll drive down there soon to make sure though.

Thanks,
azsr
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84740480
sgmamz (2020-05-08 07:26:31+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your response. I've added access=private because usually general public aren't allowed to industrial complexes. However, I'll be happy to correct this. Please share the information about the access after your visit.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Regards
sgmamz
azsr (2020-05-08 16:31:50+00:00): Hi, so I just got back from my drive around the area. I'd still maintain making the service roads access=yes/no access tag. I noticed that the long, warehouse-seeming buildings are actually filled with multiple businesses per building, including a couple of car mechanics, a signs&c printing shop, and others. As there are legitimate reasons for people to access these shops on a regular basis, I don't think that access=private is appropriate. There will be some sequences on Mapillary soon.

What do you think?

Best,
azsr
sgmamz (2020-05-11 10:36:06+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for verifying and letting me know. As per your suggestion, I've made the corrections under changeset #85018736.Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
sgmamz
user_5359 (2020-05-06 15:37:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:28:40+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Carnildo (2020-05-08 06:47:34+00:00): The vast majority of "hamlets" out in the middle of nowhere are former (or sometimes current) railway stops, and should be re-tagged as "locality", not "isolated dwelling".
Greg_Rose (2020-05-08 19:37:28+00:00): Agreed that most of these "hamlets" are not, but if there are industrial or commercial buildings still present, it's more appropriate to not downgrade all the way to "locality". The "isolated dwelling" tag is not literal - imo it's more about placename significance and associated rendering. Do you see it differently?
Carnildo (2020-05-09 02:33:25+00:00): There are two major problems with using "isolated_dwelling".

The first and more significant is that many of these names are no longer used to describe where people live.  Someone might say they live by the Fishtrap exit off I-90, but they wouldn't say they live in Fishtrap.  Many of these names are more than a century old, and represent farming communities that vanished in the 1920s and 1930s.

The second stems from the first: Nominatim and other geocoders consider isolated_dwelling to be part of the addressing hierarchy.  For example, Nominatim will tell you that the farm near the intersection of Hein Road and Safety Pin Ranch Road has a "Gravelles" address, even though the Gravelles Post Office closed in 1896 and it actually has a "Davenport" address.

(A third problem is that armchair mappers, particularly from India, will spot an American farm or ranch nearby and see it as a village, when the cluster of buildings actually represents just a single family.  They'll then move the node to the farm, to "correct" the "misplaced" village node.)
Greg_Rose (2020-05-10 07:36:31+00:00): 1. Agreed, it's ridiculous that Tyler and Fishtrap should render the same - Fishtrap is not even remotely a hamlet. However, Fishtrap is a perfect example of what should be classed as an "isolated dwelling". It has its own freeway exit; it has a namesake lake, a namesake rec area, a railroad placename and associated siding, and by god it even has a few buildings. Back in the days of the phone book, Fishtrap even had its own white pages section in the Spokane directory. Granted, it was only two or three entries... so I acknowledge it's an edge case.
2. The OSM maxim "Don't map for the renderer" should be updated to "Don't map for the renderer, nor the geocoder". I have no strong opinions about any other geocoders, but Nominatim is a piece of poo. Its inability to perform a zipcode query on a placename, and return the correct USPS-defined placename for that zipcode is inexcusable. I can easily google that info, why can't a geocoder?
3. Well that has nothing to do with this. Misinformed armchair mappers will always screw things up - doesn't matter if a place is marked as a hamlet or locality.

All in all, I think we're on the same side here. I just believe in the hierarchical nature of place-naming: if you take the Babb siding west of Cheney and compare it to Fishtrap, I strongly believe those 2 are not at the same hierarchical level - Babb is nothing, and Fishtrap is a very tiny *something*.
But... I really don't want to get into an edit war, so I'm willing to downgrade Fishtrap to a locality if you feel that strongly about it.
Carnildo (2020-05-10 20:49:10+00:00): You're missing my point with #1.  Yes, there's a label on the map that says "Fishtrap".  There are a number of buildings near it.  But there's no connection between the two: you'll be hard-pressed to find someone who would say "I live in Fishtrap" (or even "I lived in Fishtrap" -- the most recent obituary in the Spokane newspaper to mention Fishtrap dates from 1995).

This isn't the case with Tyler.  Yes, again there's a label on the map and buildings nearby.  But this time, there are also a few hundred people who would say "I live in Tyler".
muzirian (2021-11-21 10:11:08+00:00): Hi , welcome to osm, looks like roads added not as how it on ground. 
Please draw roads aligned to satellite imagery or based on ground truth.

for more help you can join t.me/osmkerala
segubi (2021-01-11 06:44:08+00:00): Hallo, mir fällt gerade die immer noch existierende Relation zu diesem Wanderweg auf. Leider bin ich kein osm Profi, aber soweit ich das verstanden habe, müßte so eine Relation zumindest als abandoned (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix) gekennzeichnet werden. Die Tags zu löschen, aber die Route als solche beizubehalten macht jedenfalls keinen Sinn. 
Was man aber auf jeden Fall machen kann, ist ein "fixme"-Tag einfügen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fixme), damit können andere, die es genauer wissen als ich, dann etwas machen.
Viele Grüße...
BeKri (2020-05-07 07:12:39+00:00): Servus,

gibt es einen vernünftigen Grund, warum dieses Stück
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32641631
jetzt "An Der Bicker Hecke", der ganze Rest samt Häuser aber weiterhin (seit 2009/2104)  "An der Bicker Hecke" ?
Stichprobe: ähnlich bei
"Auf Dem Sandberg", "An Der Burg" ...
Warum ist keine dieser Schreibweisen im Internet zu finden ?
"Bertha-Von-Suttner-Straße" wirklich mit V, da seid ihr dann die Einzigen.
Grundsätztlich: groß geschrieben Artikel halte ich für auffällig falsch, hat sich hier einer ein Witz erlaubt ?
Lg  derBeKri
BeKri (2020-05-09 17:20:26+00:00): Servus,
Heinrich-Peiffer-Straße ???
Gruss derBeKri