piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
guebosch (2021-12-28 16:30:33+00:00): Hallo Anton,
ich werde die nächsten Tage mit Skating langlauf-Ski in der Ramsau unterwegs sein, normal lebe ich in Graz. Ich kann dir auf jeden Fall dann die gpx meiner Aktivitäten senden. Ich sehe, deine letzten Änderungen waren eher Winterwanderwege und Diagonal-loipen, ich befürchte, da kann ich wenig Feedback geben. LG & Guten Rutsch Günther
yaKonovalov (2021-10-21 11:47:32+00:00): Мы одновременно нарисовали переход. Я рисовал по видео с коптера и он получился точнее. Ваш нужно удалить.
luiswoo (2021-10-21 12:02:30+00:00): Не нужно, он по снимку, пусть и не точному, а не на глаз с коптера.
luiswoo (2021-10-21 12:06:29+00:00): Тут получился аппендикс до остановки, а не переход.
yaKonovalov (2021-10-21 12:14:11+00:00): Все правильно, от пешеходного моста идёт дорожка до остановки и там обрывается. Зачем тут нужно соединение пешеходной дорожки с трассой?
luiswoo (2021-10-21 12:44:36+00:00): Не верно, нарушается связность дорог.
ZLima12 (2022-02-14 09:09:19+00:00): Please don't put multiple names (separated by a semicolon) in the name tag.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-29 21:44:25+00:00): Hello Mikhail1412,
All of your recent changeset comments are the same as this one - "Изменение данных".  That's not really very helpful - please explain to other OSM mappers a bit more about your changes - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments includes some examples.
Best Regards, Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)
SomeoneElse (2021-10-29 21:45:26+00:00): Здравствуйте Михаил1412,
Все ваши недавние комментарии к набору изменений такие же, как и этот - «Изменение данных». Это не очень полезно - пожалуйста, объясните другим разработчикам OSM немного больше о ваших изменениях - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments включает несколько примеров.
С уважением, Энди (из рабочей группы OSM по данным)
ElliottPlack (2021-10-22 09:06:21+00:00): Hi there. This national park is commonly accepted as a leisure=park here and has been tagged that way for a long time. It is not a "fix" to remove the tag. This is a linear park where most of the land is used for active recreation. If you look through the history this has been untagged as a park and then it is added back over and over. Please, don't contribute to that. If you want to raise the issue in tagging or talk-us, please do, but the locals agree it is a park.
ElliottPlack (2021-10-22 09:14:56+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/6077602

Here you can see that your account and several other generic/probably fake or throwaway accounts have a history of removing the tag.
map per (2021-10-22 11:33:14+00:00): Hi,

sure the other accounts that removed the leisure=park tag have rather less edits. But suggesting that all people who wave a different opinion are fake accounts is a little problematic.

Best wishes
map per
ElliottPlack (2021-10-22 11:45:11+00:00): I am not suggesting all accounts that do this are fake, but I’ve tracked dozens of upstart accounts that are created solely to change the tagging of parks. You, map per, are obviously not a fake account. 

Notwithstanding, what is it about the tagging of parks in the US that draws you to make these sorts of edits? What is your interest? I am genuinely curious and want to understand. I see you’re typically most active around Munich. Not that there is any restriction to work elsewhere in the world but why this park?
ZeLonewolf (2021-10-22 13:18:49+00:00): Hello map per,
Thank you for working to make our tagging more consistent in the United States.  I agree that in most cases, leisure=park on a national park or protected area is a mistake.  However, in some cases this will be correct tagging.  I would ask you to note the following for working with protected areas in the US:

1. Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands, which documents our community consensus on how these lands should be tagged.  If you believe something there is documented incorrectly, it should be discussed and not unilaterally edited.

2. Please inspect overhead imagery before removing the leisure=park tag.  If it looks like a leisure=park, it's probably a leisure=park, even if it's also a protected area or national park.

Happy mapping!
stevea (2021-10-22 14:14:58+00:00): It is quite often much more complex than "all a leisure=park" and/or "all a protected_area" (or nature_reserve).

ZeLonewolf and I have proposed using boundary=protected_area (not necessarily with a protect_class=* tag) which would allow well-documented methodologies to assign "sub-areas" (like leisure=park) where they are warranted in the larger context of the protected area.

See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Park_boundary to read that this proposal is rich, well-designed, has had over a year to absorb wide community consensus and has (to the best of my knowledge) no opposition to its basic tenets.

If you are looking to better develop "parks" in OSM, consider contributing to this proposal.  Your comments are welcome on its Discussion page.
map per (2021-10-22 19:53:21+00:00): @ ElliottPlack
I saw the park on the map by chance and decided to changed the tagging because most of the park it isn't urban. I asumed that it was just taged leisure=park becaus the word park occurs in the name. 

@ stevea
only tagging the areas of manicured park land with leisure=park sounds like a good solution
user_5359 (2022-03-11 18:55:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9190132646. What is the meaning of the tag streetlight = yes (specialy on a highway=street_lamp)?
user_5359 (2022-04-06 09:26:08+00:00): Bonjour ! Veuillez consulter le site https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9190132646. Quelle est la signification du tag lampadaire = oui (spécialement sur une autoroute=street_lamp) ?
caillou15 (2022-04-06 16:41:44+00:00): Hi. Sorry for the late answer, but I removed this tag, it doesn't mean anything and doesn't exist.
caillou15 (2022-04-06 16:42:15+00:00): You can close this discussion.
eggie (2021-10-21 12:32:10+00:00): Dag Ruben.. 
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Hier wat leesvoer...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming

Mapse,
eggie
RubenJ (2021-10-21 13:39:13+00:00): Hej Eggie,

Dan zou het wellicht een table moeten zijn in plaats van een hump.
Er zit een vlak stuk waar het voedpad op aansluit. Dat is overigens bij alle maatregelen in de omliggende eenrichtings-straten.
Gr. Ruben
eggie (2021-10-21 13:48:01+00:00): Denk t ook... 
Up to you...
Gr eggie
Dino Michelini (2021-10-29 13:38:28+00:00): Ciao, vedo che in questo changeset hai inserito in molti percorsi il numero CAI name=ref CAI. Questa pratica è sbagliata in quanto per name si intende un nome ad. es. Sentiero Frassati oppure Sentiero dei mietitori, mentre il numero CAI si appone con il tag ref. Il ref non va posto su ogni highway ma solo nella route. Per le info vedi la pagina specifica del CAI nella wiki di OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI.
lovelyfurball88 (2021-10-21 13:06:11+00:00): Make sure to check multiple imagery sources before deleting things
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112789624
highflyer74 (2021-10-21 14:32:40+00:00): Moin und danke für Deinen Beitrag hier. Das name:en=* finde ich etwas schwierig, da der Laden "Kaffee Mühle" heißt. Auch für eine englischsprachige Person heißt der POI nicht anders. Organic Maps ist vermutlich, wie auch die ursprüngliche App Maps.me nicht so gut zum Editieren von OSM Daten geeignet, da sie den Nutzer in solche "Fallen" leitet. In der Vergangenheit gab es da leider oft Probleme mit der Datenqualität.

Ich würde Dir für niedrigschwelliges Editieren auf Android eher StreetComplete, oder wenn's etwas mehr sein soll, Vespucci empfehlen. Am allerbesten geht's am Rechner mit JOSM :-) Wenn Du noch Fragen hast, melde Dich gern. Gruss aus HB!
jancborchardt (2021-10-25 11:48:03+00:00): Hi :) Hast recht, sollte Englisch gleich heißen, mein Fehler. StreetComplete nehme ich auch oft, oder eben die OSM-Webseite.

Allerdings: Der deutsche Name ist auch laut deren Website / Facebook "Kaffeemühle", nicht auseinander geschrieben: https://www.facebook.com/Muehle.Bremen
highflyer74 (2021-10-25 13:16:06+00:00): Hallo Jan und danke für Deine Rückmeldung! "Kaffemühle" könnte stimmen. Jetzt steht da allerdings "Kaffeemühle (Mühle am Wall)", was wiederum vermutlich nicht der Name ist, sondern auf der FB Seite als Beschreibung genutzt wird, oder aber aus dem Namen der Betreiberfirma, welche auf der Website angegeben wird, stammt. Auch das name:en=* ist noch da, wo wir ja festgestellt haben, dass es keinen Eigennamen des Restaurants in einer anderen Sprache gibt. Da wir es in OSM möglichst simpel halten wollen, taggt man hier nur name=* und keine andere Sprachvariante. Ich werde zur Klärung des Namens dort mal anrufen und fragen, da es durchaus wichtig ist, dass der Name in OSM stimmt.

Falls Du heute abend ab 19 Uhr am Bremer OSM Meeting mal reinschauen möchtest, bist Du herzlich willkommen auf https://meet.hackerspace-bremen.de/OSM
Leo Slager (2021-10-21 23:01:46+00:00): Dag P vd Veer,

Je hebt nu het gehele gebouw verwijderd van de kaart.
Was dat ook de bedoeling ?
Leo Slager (2021-10-21 23:06:06+00:00): Na lange tijd weer aktief geworden, zie ik, maar nooit ons welkomst bericht gehad.
Ik stuur het alsnog.
Владимир К (2022-03-13 13:49:25+00:00): Добрый день! скажите, каким образом здесь закрыт проезд на этом участке?
pluton_od (2023-07-06 16:22:16+00:00): Привіт, muchichka_s.
Яка причина цієї зміни? На вулиці є дві трамвайні колії, що зараз на карті не показується. Я думаю, що необхідно намалювати дві окремі колії з обох сторін дороги, як, наприклад, тут: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/46.41704/30.75220
Дякую.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 15:54:12+00:00): Вряд ли тут подходит похоронное бюро https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors

Скорее, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction, если там действительно есть что посмотреть.
Sakralbar (2021-10-21 16:21:21+00:00): Для туристов может быть это не особо привлекательное место, но в городе довольно известное https://2gis.ru/rostov/geo/70030076147468092
Тут иногда фотосессии проводят.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:36:17+00:00): B всё же attraction - это более подходящий тег, чем похоронное бюро.
Sakralbar (2021-10-21 17:44:16+00:00): Исправил
ezekielf (2021-10-21 21:25:01+00:00): Hi webfil,
This changeset left a gap in the Lake Champlain multipolygon, breaking rendering.  Please be careful!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/132216
https://ibb.co/xst6k8w

I fixed it in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112811246

It looks like a remnant of the administrative boundary you deleted still exists. I wasn't sure if I should clean it up or not.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12631636
webfil (2021-10-21 21:36:42+00:00): Sorry about that. It's a huge mistake on my behalf. Thanks for pointing that out. I couldn't make jOSM work so I tried my best. I will look into it more deeply tonight.
BCNorwich (2021-10-21 16:51:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The name is on the area outline so no need for the POI. Duplicate name removed.

Regards Bernard.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 15:41:05+00:00): Проверьте геометрию по подложке Esri. Вроде, она не такая. Для выпрямления углов используйте клавишу Q.
iWowik (2021-10-21 13:27:45+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте пожалуйста принятый порядок наименвания улиц. Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 15:35:01+00:00): Одного тега access=private достаточно. Не требуется перечислять все способы передвижения.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112791865
Joel Amos (2021-11-19 00:19:21+00:00): Please be careful when modifying existing geometries, especially if you're just replacing hand-drawn with AI. The Magpie geometry, for example, regressed quite a bit with this change.
Joel Amos (2021-11-19 01:22:54+00:00): That said, it looks like you've been making some nice business edits, so thanks for that!
mueschel (2021-10-24 17:24:16+00:00): Please check this way, it has no valid tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995254736
Lee Carré (2021-10-21 15:29:56+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
muzirian (2023-09-28 09:25:57+00:00): Hi thanks for the edits.
Have noticed some issue with the edit, please check if poi are already existing before adding,.
Aslo please dont add the name 'unamed road' to roads for which you dont know the name, please keep them blank.
brianboru (2023-02-12 15:14:13+00:00): Best way to add pavement is to tag the existing highway sidewalk= x where x = both, left or right as appropriate
AmyCupcake (2023-02-12 15:52:02+00:00): This would cause a massive reduction in the capability of routing engines to provide accurate distances and tell pedestrians where is best to cross, so I very much disagree
AmyCupcake (2023-02-12 15:53:08+00:00): fast != best
marcoSt (2021-10-23 11:03:12+00:00): Servus rms_LDIE,

Bist Du dir wirklich sicher, dass die Bushaltestelle Moosstraße von der Finkenstraße in die besagte Moosstraße verlegt wurde? Weil dann müsste der 622er den Riegerauer Weg nehmen, um zur Haltestelle Finkenstraße zu kommen, siehe Busplan: https://efa.mvv-muenchen.de/ttb/mvv_19622___H_s21_1.pdf.
Viki_travel_weak (2021-11-04 11:20:12+00:00): Hi alix_geovelo,
it looks like you accidentally deleted an important road Way 38722960, please revert it.
Regard, Viki_travel_weak!
Viki_travel_weak (2021-11-04 11:21:59+00:00): let me know if you have problems, I will help you return to JOSM
Thanks for your attention.
alix_geovelo (2021-11-04 13:18:09+00:00): Hi,
I'm sorry for that big mistake, it looks like a stupid typing error while working on josm....

I just reverted the changeset, so I think everything is know fixed.
ID of the reverted changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113369790


Thanks you your attention,

Best regards,
Alix from Geovelo
Viki_travel_weak (2021-11-04 13:32:09+00:00): thank you for your quick reply. Yes, this happens with JOSM and I understand you. Thank you!
Regard.
MikeN (2021-10-21 13:49:12+00:00): These are fictional edits - please stop vandalizing the map, which many people are using
Yunkers (2021-11-05 22:51:43+00:00): Hej, czy nazwa ulicy "As" to nie błąd?
Mariusz Dykierek (2021-11-06 09:06:52+00:00): Przepraszam za wtopę. Changesetem 113437767 przywróciłem nazwy sprzed pomyłki.
Yunkers (2021-11-07 15:32:37+00:00): Dzięki za szybką reakcję. Czy dałbyś radę przejrzeć też kategorie dróg w okolicy? Jeden nowy użytkownik sporo pozmieniał, ale ja nie jestem z okolic i ciężko mi to zweryfikować.
Mariusz Dykierek (2021-11-07 22:36:04+00:00): Oj nie za bardzo. Byłem tam na wycieczce ale prędko nie wrócę w tę okolicę.
user_5359 (2021-10-24 15:36:45+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte keine Wege löschen sondern Zugriffsrechte setzen (siehe Wiki key access). Deine Änderung werde ich zurücksetzen.
Lee Carré (2021-10-21 18:59:44+00:00): “revert vandalism”

Of / from which changeset, originally?
woodpeck (2021-10-21 20:52:40+00:00): All of them - all that were created by user "mortensonfan". A list is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mortensonfan/history
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 15:33:12+00:00): Вы наплодили одинаковых домов с одинаковой ориентацией. Присутствуют наложения и контуры там, где вообще нет строений.

Вы будете сами исправлять геометрию и ориентацию домов или просто откатить этот пакет, так как легче нарисовать заново, чем править геометрию и крутить каждый дом?
Kovoschiz (2021-10-21 14:13:02+00:00): `=parking` is the entire parking lot including planters and any structures, not the same as `=parking_space` + `capacity=`.
eggie (2021-10-21 17:51:32+00:00): Dag Mathee..  
De verbinding naar de Houtdreef is geen fietspad, maar gewoon een highway=residential met aan de zuidzijde een paaltje.

 Dat zou dan het autoverkeer tegenhouden.
De bewoners kunnen ook immers met hun auto naar de oprijlaan.

De verbinding naar de Aaltenseweg kan beter als highway=path worden getagd. Het is geen fietspad. Op de N weg mag niet gefietst en gebrommerd worden.

Mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-10-21 18:02:08+00:00): Mathee.. het is altijd lastig om een wegklasse toe te kennen. De fietspaden heb ik omgetagd naar residential en path.
Alleen fietspaden taggen als er een bord fietspad staat. G11, 13 of 12a
Op het verbindingsstuk zal het niet routeren voor autoverkeer. Er staat een barrier=bollard nu. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-21 18:07:32+00:00): De fietsroute heb ik weer hersteld. Waneer je wegen gaat splitsen met OV en fiets en wandelroutes (routerelaties) en je doet dat met editor iD gaat zo'n route stuk. Dus svp geen wegen splitsen. Het is ook niet nodig.
Gebruik editor JOSM als je routes wilt bewerken.
gr eggie
Taktaal (2021-10-27 17:58:28+00:00): Kurze Frage: Hast du beim Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154504355 absichtlich die nordwestliche Ecke so spitz gemacht? Gemäss Luftbild stimmt das nicht.
Sanniu (2021-10-24 07:41:07+00:00): Hi

Any connection to existing road network?
Udi (2021-10-24 07:51:02+00:00): This is a Pedestrian network. For those arriving by car, full pedestrian access is available from the parking lot on the west.
Sanniu (2021-10-24 08:03:33+00:00): So, can you connect that by pedestrian/footpath for the sake of automated routing? This way the app that allows mixed routing will guide pedestrians from parking lot to their destination. Now it is not possible.
Udi (2021-10-24 08:09:43+00:00): I think that routing to the parking lot is good enough.
Sanniu (2021-10-24 08:15:58+00:00): You can enter to the pedestrian part from every point of parking lot? Or there are dedicated entrances? Of latter - better to map them.
BTW, there are many unconnected junctions on the paths that you've added.
Udi (2021-10-24 10:55:03+00:00): you can enter anywhere.
Viajero Perdido (2021-10-23 00:55:25+00:00): Hi sonik90.

Assuming that's a typical mountaineering route, may I suggest adding "trail_visibility=no" (or as appropriate) to the path?

Some maps will render that as, say, a dotted line, rather than something more substantial.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 15:23:56+00:00): water=pond - это всё же что-то облагородженое, например, в парке, сквере, личном участке. Тут же просто бесформенный водоём https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:water%3Dpond
4004 (2021-10-24 22:37:26+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135726995 там уже не собираются продлевать?
Futur3r (2021-10-23 13:03:06+00:00): Bonjour,

Pas besoin de rajouter name:fr car name est de base en français vu que le village est en france.

Merci pour votre contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112795624
alix_geovelo (2021-10-21 14:47:16+00:00): Erreur de titre du groupe de notification
Piste cyclable Bd Bourdon fermée jusqu'a fin 1er trimestre 2022.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 15:19:40+00:00): Вы уверены, что это сад? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

Больше похоже на обычный natural=wood
fabiotofy (2021-10-21 17:56:08+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto! Il nome utilizzato comunemente dalla gente per chiamare un posto va inserito in un apposito tag "loc_name". Non va bene mettere tutto nel campo principale "name". Grazie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112795965
parsewski (2022-03-25 12:02:10+00:00): Hi! Aus reiner Neugier und weil ich's genial finde: Woher kommt der Name 'Beamtenschlucht'? Ist das ein etabliertes Toponym?
globosound (2022-03-25 12:33:38+00:00): Wo hast du diese Bezeichnung her? Ich habe sicher nichts damit getaggt und ich finde sie auch in diesem Ausschnitt nicht. Und "etabliert" glaube ich nicht, höre und lese gerade das erste Mal diesen Begriff. Aber prinzipiell sind hier einige Bundesdienststellen angesiedelt, da passt die Bezeichnung vielleicht sogar ;)
Luzandro (2022-03-25 13:31:33+00:00): ist offenbar schon länger in OSM, die v1 von globosound auf dem einen Abschnitt war nur wegen der Aufsplittung des ways: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/32726184
parsewski (2022-03-25 13:41:53+00:00): Ah cool danke für den Hinweis und das Tool. D.h. User Girolamo hat den Namen eingetragen.
globosound (2022-03-25 13:59:13+00:00): Von mir auch ein Danke für den link, kannte ich ebenfalls nicht - was ich heute alles lerne, Ausdrücke, tools ... ;)
ToniE (2021-10-22 07:40:04+00:00): Hi,

how long will the construction take place?

Short periods of constructions will not be mapped like this in OSM, rather using something like this

oneway:conditional = yes @ (2021 Oct 21-2021 Oct 31)

reason: someone (Navi-SW provider like OsmAnd, or users, ...) who download data from OSM only once a month or twice a year may see wrong status of oneway for a longer period than actually is.

Regards,
Toni
Ropino (2021-11-25 08:41:35+00:00): Hallo,
Woher stammt die Information, dass der Werksverkauf von Zwilling nicht mehr existiert?
Ich habe vor 6 Tagen dort eingekauft. D.h. der Laden existiert. 
Dein Kommentar "Add opening hours" passt auch nicht wirklich.
Ich werde deine Änderung wieder zurücknehmen.
fabiotofy (2021-10-21 17:59:42+00:00): Ciao, nel campo "name" va messo il nome specifico della struttura (esempio "Bunker di Soratte) non una semplice descrizione dell'elemento che, fra l'altro, è già compresa nel tag "building".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112796671
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-22 09:34:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9190588426

motor_vehicle=destination? That would mean that trucks and cars that are not using this road as shortcut can pass through this bollard. Is it accurate?
AntSel (2021-10-22 09:53:51+00:00): It should probably be motor_vehicle=no, but I wanted to check it in person, first, to be sure.
DaveF (2021-10-22 10:19:17+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995265850#map=18/52.30374/-0.67565

Has platform 3 been shortened?

https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6885959
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 15:17:23+00:00): Используйте клавишу Q для выравнивания углов здания с прямыми углами.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112796863
rhtb0 (2024-02-19 13:24:55+00:00): 오픈스트리트맵 한국에서는 군사시설이 없는 오픈스트리트맵 지도를 공개하고 있습니다.
https://tiles.osm.kr/#18/37.57500/126.97700
fabiotofy (2021-10-21 18:11:19+00:00): Ciao, per fare queste correzioni sul posizionamento degli edifici (quindi oggetti 3d) non fidarti delle immagini aeree BING perché hanno grossi problemi di errori di traslazione. Il lavoro corretto è quello di utilizzare un EDITOR tipo "JOSM" e lavorarci utilizzando come sfondo Raster, ad esempio, le nuove TRUE-ORTOFOTO della Regione 2020 che hanno una correzione automatica per la gestione di oggetti cartografici in rilievo. In questo caso l'errore medio generato sul posizionamento degli edifici è di 20 metri. Mica poco :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112797399
Uralla (2021-10-22 06:33:53+00:00): Зачем ставишь теги несоответствующие действительности?
pfg21 (2021-10-26 07:01:42+00:00): поточнее что и где ??
fabiotofy (2021-10-21 18:52:10+00:00): anche quì non è corretto mettere tutte le indicazione nal campo NAME. Il nome storico va messo nel tag apposito old_name. Vedasi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112797783
pwbriggs (2026-05-19 06:03:11+00:00): I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995269878 is not a roundabout? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Possible_misinterpretations - It feels more like a junction=circular to me. Maybe you know more about this and can help clear up my confusion.