piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gino-52 (2018-04-14 17:59:36+00:00): Hallo  KartoGrapHiti
Du hast die Linie: 236135478 aufgeteilt.
Richtig, da gibt es zwei verschiedene Tempolimits.
Die anderen Linien waren schon da. Habe ich übersehen.
Aber durch Deine Aufteilung wurde in den Relationen Bus FB-42 1-1 bis 1–12 die Reihenfolge falsch hinterlegt. Wie schon gesagt macht JOSM das manchmal nicht richtig. Ich wollte ja nur mal darauf hinweisen, dass in Zukunft kurz zu kontrollieren.
Viele Grüße
Gino
RicoElectrico (2023-12-24 22:15:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3510872 - ktoś ma uwagę co do nazwy cieku.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:30:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:31:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:04:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:30:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:32:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:30:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:30:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:25:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:30:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
richlv (2020-11-29 20:02:48+00:00): Hi, this changeset has added multiple strange footways that do not seem to match surface model / ortophotos:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/57.8047/25.2223

Also a footway named "Rūnnu ZĪmes tak":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579496738

What are these, what's the source, and where do the names come from?
HellMap (2024-12-09 17:15:41+00:00): Most of these have been reverted since. I removed a few remaining ones. (And also fixed a bunch of other errors and minor issues.) These names look completely fictitious and the paths themselves are placed in impossible or dubious locations, like over ditches and through dense cutlines. The changesets are missing (valid) comments and sources to show otherwise.
Luzandro (2022-05-03 14:12:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3163642
Leo Slager (2018-04-13 22:44:23+00:00): Goede zaak, dat zijn waardevolle aanvullingen en dat brengt de kaart weer meer up to date.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:32:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
AkuAnakTimur (2018-04-13 09:33:55+00:00): Okay ke...?
mor (2018-04-15 23:37:24+00:00): Cuando un comercio cambia de nombre es conveniente utilizar la etiqueta old_name
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:31:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Hjart (2018-04-13 10:01:00+00:00): Oversættelsen af https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=dam i iD er ikke helt optimal, så derfor har du ladet dig snyde til at tagge de her små damme som noget helt andet end tiltænkt. Jeg har lige rettet oversættelsen, så fejltagelsen forhåbentlig ikke sker igen fremover :-)
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:30:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
woodpeck_repair (2018-04-13 10:04:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 57853551, 57853589, 57853617, 57853804, 57853851, 57930275, 57930316, 57930505, 58037429, 58054654, 58055808.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
mgpx (2018-04-15 21:42:03+00:00): A "Veszprém m. pedagógiai szakszolgálat" POI-val jelölt épület egészen biztosan nem iskola, itt egy lakóépület áll a földszinten irodahelyiségekkel (régen gyógyszertár volt). Javítani kellene az OSM címkéjét.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
DaveF (2018-04-13 14:05:54+00:00): Hi
Who are 'we'?
'name' id for official titles which are declared on signs or out of copyright maps etc. If there's a name known just locally please use 'loc_name'
dbrb2 (2018-04-13 14:08:30+00:00): 'we' are the local running club who run up and down it a lot. I'll change the field as suggested :-)
Warin61 (2018-04-14 22:46:40+00:00): And has damaged relations for Clarinda District, Sandringham District, South-Eastern Metropolitan Region and Southern Metropolitan Region. 

Way 5795202496 is named!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is a continuation of Charman and Chesterville Rds  - junction in middle of the Nepean Hwy. 

Repaired. Be more carefull.
highflyer74 (2018-04-14 09:24:59+00:00): Moin!

Noch ein Tipp: highway=footway wird normalerweise nur für ausgewiesene Fußwege verwendet (also mit Verkehrsschild, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway). Für Wege, die nicht explizit so beschildert sind, nimmt man lieber highway=path mit foot=yes und bicycle=yes. Viele Grüße!
Tleclh (2018-04-14 09:31:36+00:00): Alles klar, danke
Alecs01 (2018-08-27 18:30:35+00:00): Ciao Denis, ho notato per caso il nome di questa strada, "Valter GI", è corretto? A prima vista sembra un refuso. Grazie
4004 (2018-04-14 20:25:40+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
я так понимаю, это названия улиц? они пишутся немного иначе, со статусной частью, поправил
user_6110846 (2018-04-14 13:43:52+00:00): Удаление англиского - демострация картографического рассизма (ксенофобии шовинизма ) к англискому языку ведь английский язык это США Великой Британии Был бы в США Великой Британии не английский   а другой то имеенно этот другой был бы удален
luiswoo (2018-04-14 13:51:27+00:00): name:en на месте, в чём проблема? https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Caspian%20Sea#map=6/42.066/50.416
user_6110846 (2018-04-14 14:15:11+00:00): я о теге нейм 
Был он на агнглиском пока не пришел англоненавистник господин luiswoo
luiswoo (2018-04-14 14:29:48+00:00): Это международные воды, name прежде всего для местных названий, что невозможно, если языков больше чем один.
"— Одна ката, один язык, одно мнение!!!"
" — я-я!!, натюрлих!!!"
Nakaner (2018-04-13 12:13:52+00:00): Hi hvalentim,

this changeset seems to be part of an import. Where can I find the documentation of this import on the OSM wiki? When was this import discussed on the international imports mailing list?

Admin boundaries are fragile in OSM. Therefore, I ask you to immediately stop this import and answer these questions as soon as possible.

If you cannot prove that this import complies with the import guidelines, I will revert quite quickly [1] it because there are some quality issues with the data you uploaded.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Best regards

Michael


[1] Boundaries in OSM are fragile and I want to minimize damage when I revert your import.
hvalentim (2018-04-13 12:21:53+00:00): The "import" is confined to one (1) small municipality of Portugal. It may seem "huge" since I was importing from a saved session and JOSM apparently uploaded the nodes one by one. I am following conventions established amidst Portuguese OSM users, as documented here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ViriatoLusitano/diary
glglgl (2018-04-13 12:33:20+00:00): It is indeed huge, as each changeset contains about 10000 nodes. Besides, instead of using the existing lines, maybe splitting them up, you uploaded a bunch of new lines whose position deviates from the positions of the existing lines. This is very questionable.
hvalentim (2018-04-13 12:47:44+00:00): You have to realize that the closest we have in PT to admin=10 boundaries is info sourced from the Census and updated every 10 years (the last one being from 2011), while admin=9 boundaries are updated yearly and suffered a major change in 2013. Result: they do not match exactly and will not until 2021.
Nakaner (2018-04-13 12:51:33+00:00): Hi hvalentim,

thank you for the link to the user diary. However, it is still an import because you use a third-party data source and that source is no aerial or satellite imagery or street-level photo.

It's sad to say it but just copying data from shape files into OSM is already a lot of work but we must know if we are permitted to use and distribute that data or if we would violate copyright laws by using it. That's one point which a proper documentation of the import on the wiki should mention. The discussion which is the second important point of the Import Guidelines gives other contributors from abroad the possibility to review it and point out mistakes before they are done in the OSM database.

Best regards

Michael
seichter (2018-04-13 13:45:20+00:00): Hi hvalentim,
*if* the import does not violate copyright laws,
it should be preprocessed anyway before uploading to OSM. The boundaries obviously have been taken from shape files forming single closed rings. There is e.g. a plugin in QGIS which converts adjacent shape files to split ways from boundary triangle to triangle which is the established method to map boundaries.

Additionally lower precision boundaries have to be matched to higher precision boundaries. From your comments I conclude that some of the AL10 census boundaries have to be corrected to AL9 lines from 2013.
hvalentim (2018-04-13 13:47:41+00:00): Would you please then delete all the changesets done today? Thank You.
Nakaner (2018-04-13 14:47:27+00:00): Yes, I will do later today.
ViriatoLusitano (2018-04-13 15:58:52+00:00): The issue in question is about the permission of the data? Because if yes then INE the provider has releases the data with no restrictions, asking only for attribution which is already included in the source tag. http://mapas.ine.pt/download/metadados/bgri11.html
hvalentim (2018-04-13 19:07:13+00:00): seichter -> Now that I think of it, it's a bit more complicated than that. In fact, we are talking about boundaries of small localities which in rural areas not necessarily match admin 9 boundaries as they left over unpopulated areas. I acknowledge the argument of efficiency (using split ways). In fact, I used QGIS to aggregate the polygons in the first place from the original many much smaller ones. Do you know the name of the plugin to achieve it?
hvalentim (2018-04-13 19:14:44+00:00): Nakaner -> Perhaps you can hold the "revert" button? After all, this may not be as "bad" as it seemed? I realize now that although I started by conflating the data, the layer was still marked as "dirty" and this somehow generated apprehension.
Nakaner (2018-04-13 19:25:57+00:00): @hvalentim I haven't started the revert yet (but if you had asked me in 10 minutes, you would have been to late ;-)).

@ViritanoLusitano I am not really convinced by the link you provided. That's a link to the dataset but I don't find anything about copyright there.

Please keep in mind that CC-BY is not compatible to our license. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
Nakaner (2018-04-13 19:26:27+00:00): … and I won't revert it today.
ViriatoLusitano (2018-04-13 19:40:48+00:00): I will personally email them to ask and clarify then.
ViriatoLusitano (2018-04-13 19:42:24+00:00): By the way its this part I'm mentioning. https://i.imgur.com/Y4415EN.png
ViriatoLusitano (2018-04-23 20:38:57+00:00): The owner of the data still hasn't replied. I will wait until the 27th for a reply but if none comes until then I will contact the e-mail of the employer of said person. http://snig.dgterritorio.pt/portal/
ViriatoLusitano (2018-05-11 10:14:34+00:00): Got the following e-mail from the owner of the data, it states as follows:

"Bom dia, as minhas desculpas pela resposta tardia ao seu email. Confirmo que o conjunto de dados geográfico (CGD)  relativos à Base Geográfica de Informação (BGRI) são open data e o INE terá todo o interesse em que os mesmos integrem a base de dados do OSM. Este CGD está harmonizado com a diretiva INSPIRE e publicado em serviço ATOM http://inspire.ine.pt/SU/atom/downloadservice.xml

Coloco em conhecimento a colega do Serviço de Difusão para eventuais esclarecimentos adicionais."

Translated:

"Good morning, my apologies for the late reply to your email. I confirm that the geographic data set (CGD) for the Geographic Information Base (BGRI) is open data and that INE will have every interest in integrating them into the OSM database. This CGD is harmonized with the INSPIRE directive and published in the ATOM service http://inspire.ine.pt/SU/atom/downloadservice.xml

I would like to inform you that I informed some colleages through the Broadcasting Service in case they need any further clarification."
glglgl (2018-05-11 11:14:04+00:00): Very fine, thank you. So I think there isn't any problem with the license of the data. But you should try to integrate it into the currenly present data.
abakus_uploader (2018-04-13 22:32:17+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Владимир К (2018-05-16 12:22:31+00:00): второй телефон неверно записан
bxl-forever (2018-09-04 00:53:28+00:00): Hello,
You have been adding more than 60 fire hydrants to the map on only a couple of days.  I couldn’t find them when walking through those areas.
Are they underground amenities?  Or indoor?  Should that be true, I suppose they should be tagged differently; you forced "fire_hydrant:type=pillar" on them, which describes ordinary hydrants and they should be clearly visible from the street.
Another question: were those location established through surveying or are you importing data from a database?
Please reply.  Otherwise we might forced to treat those edits as suspicious and revert them.
mueschel (2018-04-15 14:25:39+00:00): Hi,
you used a strange tag on some of these nodes: "_Localisation_de_la_structure_precision". Could you explain what it means?
JustinSto (2018-04-13 13:42:59+00:00): Danke fürs korrigieren. Leider geht bei mir die Straße immernoch über den Fluss :/
opendcc (2018-04-13 14:08:05+00:00): Hallo,

hier muß man unterscheiden zwischen Datenbankinhalt und dargestelltem Kartenbild: Ausgehend von der Datenbank werden die Bilder berechnet und das kann je nach Zoomstufe ein gewisse Zeit dauern - auch mal Tage, wenn sehr viel los ist.
miche101 (2018-04-13 15:23:35+00:00): ja genau,.. dauert nur ein bisschen.. je nachdem wie fleißig die Mapper sind ;-)
PT-53 (2018-04-18 05:35:31+00:00): Hallo Cherub,
Du hast diesen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542044718 neu eingezeichnet. Jetzt wird in keep right für diesen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5277415362#map=19/47.95825/9.63242 in Hinweis beinahe-Verbindungen, Node 5277415362 angezeigt (Siehe https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=99879087).
Wenn zwischen dem Knoten und dem neuen Weg wirklich keine Verbindung besteht, könnte man an dem Knoten noch noexit=yes (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:noexit) ergänzen, damit QS-Tools wie keep right keine unnötigen Hinweise anzeigen.Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-04-14 13:27:09+00:00): via nao devem sobrepor areas como voce fez aqui. ja resolvi separando