piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vrmap (2020-09-02 09:39:16+00:00): Ciao Francesco, ho visto che con il tuo primo inserimento hai mappato un percorso che da Peri va a Cassone. In Openstreetmap vanno inseriti i percorsi ufficiali per i quali esiste una tabellazione ed una documentazione. Openstreetmap non è uno dei siti in cui un utente carica il proprio itinerario personale. Inoltre gli itinerari vanno inseriti con le relazioni e non con singole way lunghissime ... e qui il discorso si fa più complesso. Mappare in Openstreetmap può essere un'attività interessantissima, io la faccio da alcuni anni; ma occorre, prima di cominciare, leggere la documentazione e le regole per mappare. Se è un'attività che ti piace io sono dosponibile, insieme a tutta la comunità di Openstreetmap ad aiutarti e supportarti. In merito alle modifiche che hai fatto io le eliminerei se sei daccordo.
Francesco Carretta (2020-09-02 09:45:57+00:00): Grazie per l'informazione, ho frainteso il regolamento di OpenStreetMap. Per l'eliminazione posso procedere solamente io o è possibile che i percorsi vengano modificati anche da altri utenti?
vrmap (2020-09-02 10:01:30+00:00): Il ripristino delle modifiche è un'operazione piuttosto complessa, ci penso io.
Buona giornata.
Francesco Carretta (2020-09-02 10:16:49+00:00): Grazie ancora. Buona giornata
Frans S (2020-08-28 15:08:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Mappings are rather accurate. No errors<
Just 1 remark.  The buildings throws a shadow on the ground. Do not include these in your mappings.

On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90077191
Frans S (2020-08-28 15:17:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90077191
user_5359 (2020-08-28 17:24:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You have added a node, but have not added any keys to the node. I add the given address from your change set comment to the node.
DiogoBaptista98 (2020-08-29 15:17:03+00:00): Destruiu uma rota de autocarros associada a varias vias que editou, peço que tenha mais cuidado quando edita as mesmas. Cumprimentos
Pedro Guerra (2020-08-29 15:24:10+00:00): Peço desculpa, terá sido inadvertidamente. Podia explicar-me em concreto qual foi a rota, para que não se repita? Cumprimentos
DiogoBaptista98 (2020-08-31 14:52:57+00:00): Foi uma das rotas de autocarro, e especial afectou a 34B na zona da Estrada de Chelas mas já está corrigida.
gileri (2020-08-31 12:06:00+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour ces correctifs !

À noter que "building:part" ne s'utilise pas sur des nœuds pour la même raison que "building".

Pour la chapelle, la solution est de ne pas mettre "building:part", "amenity=place_of_worship" suffit à lui seul.
bagage (2020-08-31 12:07:57+00:00): Hello gileri,
Je sais que building:part ne s'utilise pas sur un noeud, mais je préfère le laisser (la chapelle est bien un building:part dans l'absolu) - en espérant que quelqu'un soit capable de tracer le polygone précis de son emprise !
gileri (2020-08-31 13:33:35+00:00): Ok je comprends mieux l'idée.

Je suis cependant pas sûr que ce soit un "building:part" dédié, mais je connais pas le lieu :

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Q0tO-R6madpkTp8Lkiru8A
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-21 15:48:03+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3408041 ?
Frans S (2020-08-28 15:05:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Your mappings are rather accurate. You missed just 1 action. Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.  44 out of 51 were not fine squared.

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90078804
Frans S (2020-08-28 15:02:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 
Mappings are rather accurate. Just a remark. The buildings here are rather complex. Please map them as accurate as possible by following all extentions and corners. Sometimes you map them rather simple as a rectangular or 6 corner building.
This is task 903 and still open for mapping. Please correct and improve your mappings.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90078836
Frans S (2020-08-31 10:05:28+00:00): Hello  Thanks for mapping here 
A remark. Just map a building as building=yes. Add no names to them exept when you are locally familiar.
Anton Khorev (2020-10-02 04:48:19+00:00): How do you know the correct alignment? You did Esri 0;0 offset, right?
Risle (2020-10-03 00:14:50+00:00): Hi Anton Khorev, thanks for reaching out. I referred to Strava and OSM GPS traces in this area and found that ESRI imagery is well-aligned with 0;0 offset here.
Anton Khorev (2020-10-03 13:55:36+00:00): What if you had started with a different offset, like 3;9 - wouldn't you have also found that it was well-aligned?

If 0;0 was the correct offset, you'd have discovered that everything around this place is off by 5 meters. But you moved just one building.

You also tried to add details to the contour of the building. It's not that easy to do, because the building has parts of various heights. Because of that, some parts are covered by shadows. You have to be careful not to cut them out.
Risle (2020-10-06 01:52:03+00:00): Hi Anton Khorev, thanks for your suggestion about the building editing. I understand your point about 3:9 offsets being the best fit around this area as all buildings have the same offset value. I’ll make sure to take note of these kinds of details for future edits so everything is spatially consistent.
Anton Khorev (2020-10-06 09:18:07+00:00): I'm not saying that 3;9 is the best offset. I've rounded the numbers. Also the imagery is wobbly nearby, so the best offset changes rapidly. The point was that 0;0 is rarely the best.
Risle (2020-10-06 21:05:07+00:00): Thanks for clarifying your point here, understood.
user_5359 (2020-12-06 05:44:40+00:00): Hello! You add a area with natural=wood inside of area with natural=wood (siehe relation https://www.osm.org/relation/5359933) What is the meaning of this tagging? Is there any difference (in this case don't forget to add the difference and make this way to an inner member of the relation).
eggie (2021-04-04 14:08:04+00:00): deleted
Frans S (2020-08-28 14:48:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are rather accurate. Just 1 remark
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key in the editor
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90081441
brianboru (2021-01-20 16:40:47+00:00): Can you confirm an OSM licence-compatible source for the proposed rod junction layout?
StreetZGZ (2020-08-28 12:33:11+00:00): https://goo.gl/maps/RrNrRwWGAwRfQSUq7
StreetZGZ (2020-08-28 12:33:56+00:00): A ser posible deja el nombre que no le hace daño a nadie y es como se le conoce.....
Robot8A (2020-08-28 12:48:43+00:00): Buenas,
como sabes no se puede usar datos de otros mapas de los que no tengamos permiso expreso o no estén en el dominio público.
Por otra parte, el parque en si no tiene nombre, desde luego no oficialmente, y en mi opinión Parque Pinares de Venecia no es más que una descripción del lugar donde se encuentra el parque, véase https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones

Personalmente lo he escuchado llamado como Parque de la Calle Cuarte más veces, así que no tiene nombre fijo, por lo que es objeto de discusión. Tampoco hay ningún cartel ni nombre oficial por parte del Ayuntamiento (lo mismo pasa en el de Fray Julián Garcés junto a la gasolinera o en el de la calle Oviedo).

Saludos,
Héctor
Martin Borsje (2020-08-28 15:12:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Je hebt een fout gemaakt en het gehele industriegebied als building gemapt; dat klopt niet. Ik zet e.e.a. recht
Martin Borsje (2020-08-28 15:14:03+00:00): Ik heb de gehele changeset teruggedraaid; het kan niet zijn dat de gehele kazerneplaats een autosloop geworden is?
tux67 (2020-08-28 13:51:56+00:00): Hi, du hattest ein Review requested .. den Raiffeisen Markt hab ich an die neue Stelle umgezogen. Steht das alte Gebäude noch? Die anderen Änderungen scheinen ok. Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90081852
Frans S (2020-09-02 09:12:30+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping are father accurate but lacks the finishing touch of squaring them
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Connecticut (2020-08-30 05:55:01+00:00): 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497262372

Hi,
hast du mit Absicht
highway=secondary
bei der L 1150 entfernt?
Frans S (2020-08-28 14:41:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay more attention on accurate mapping.
You map just  rectangular where buildings has a more complex form. Also don't collect mulitble buildings in 1 mapping.  (Industrial estate on top left).
This task 1062 is still open for mapping. Please correct your mappings

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90082059
Frans S (2020-08-28 14:35:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Sorry to say, but your mappings are not accurate enough. Please map more precise by following the outlines of buildings (exclude courtyards) and square the buildings
This is task 668 and still open for mapping.
Please correct your mappings.

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90082449
skfd (2020-10-04 06:00:48+00:00): Добрый день! Классно что вы добавляете панно на карту, пишите пожалуйста название или описания ) Спасибо!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90083011
Frans S (2020-08-28 14:32:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors.
Just 1 remark. You have an offset of 3 meters on this task. Did you alter something ?
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90083375
Martin Borsje (2020-08-28 15:09:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Frans S (2020-08-28 14:26:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
See my comment on previous changeset
This is task 451 which is still open for mapping
P;ease correct your mappings 
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90083466
Carnildo (2020-08-29 21:07:08+00:00): When you were deciding to re-classify Clark Lake Road as tertiary, did you somehow miss that only about half of it actually existed?
vogelfreier (2020-09-04 15:29:31+00:00): I can no longer reproduce that.
As there are many different aerial photographs available and I only want to work with a few, and I don't want to download too much data, as in this case with Maproulette, because I don't know if the next task is right next to it and someone is working on it (or as with you now, someone is working on it and working on it), you want to get your changed data set uploaded as fast as possible.
Since you have edited this access road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6212549 ,why do you leave the tiger:reviewed=no standing?

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Frans S (2020-10-07 10:15:04+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
gscholz (2020-10-03 15:40:48+00:00): Hi egmont,
just for curiosity reasons I would be interested why you have added tags like access=no and the name "4x4" here. Is this actualy the name of this road? What is your source for this information? I would also be interested what "access=no" actually means here. What is your source for this information?

Regarding your changelog comments you seem only to use the text "new". This single word does not mean anything for other contributors. Can you please adopt your comments according to this wiki page:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind Regards
Guido
Frans S (2020-08-28 14:23:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not so accurate as they should be. Please map more precise by following the outlines of a building
Please continue on task 829 and correct/improve your mappings 

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90084150
user_5359 (2025-06-06 07:19:35+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/25yZ! Why do all trees have the same tag node = 7853486733? Can this “information” be removed from today's perspective?
Sidapo (2025-06-06 15:33:32+00:00): Yes that can be removed. I'm not sure why that Tag is there in the first place
user_5359 (2025-06-06 15:54:27+00:00): Done! Thanks for the quick reply.
Frans S (2020-08-28 14:17:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please improve your mapping skills. Your mappings are not accurate enough. Often you draw just a rectangular ( including the courtyard as well) despite the building has a complicated layout.
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90084675
Frans S (2020-10-07 10:55:01+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Tomas Straupis (2020-08-29 08:14:34+00:00): Atstačiau sugadintą kelių klasifikaciją
Lukas Antanavičius (2020-08-29 08:21:35+00:00): kelias iki dvaro yra siauras, nėra tarpmiestinis ir jo automobilių apkrova yra minimali. Blogai supratau klasifikaciją?
Tomas Straupis (2020-08-29 08:56:02+00:00): Siaurumas/platumas nesvarbu. Tai krašto kelias su oficialiu numeriu 4750, su kieta danga, todėl secondary.
DD1GJ (2020-08-28 14:12:01+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89934347
Anakil (2020-08-28 17:13:20+00:00): Bonjour Flupke1400,

Attention quand tu traces des limites administratives : il ne faut pas ré-utiliser des routes existantes ou d'autres lignes ayant une autre valeur (il faut retracer une nouvelle ligne à la place pour éviter que la relation ne soit cassée par une édition de l'élément après). le but est de ne jamais mêler les tags "admin_level" et "boundary" avec un autre élément ! :-)
J'ai corrigé la majorité normalement.

D'ailleurs quel est ta source pour les anciennes communes ? Puisqu'aucune source officielle n'existe, je me demandais. :p 

Bien à toi,
Anakil
Phil Hays (2020-08-30 04:25:43+00:00): removed hov=designated
Phil Hays (2020-08-30 04:26:04+00:00): removed hov=designated
Frans S (2020-08-28 14:12:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90085882
andi9876 (2021-10-07 21:05:11+00:00): Nice work :)
SomeoneElse (2020-08-31 13:11:58+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please use changeset comments tht explain what you're editing and what the source was.  "1" does not explain anything to anyone.

If you have any questions please email OSM’s Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-08-31 13:12:23+00:00): Cześć i witaj w OpenStreetMap!

Użyj komentarzy do zestawu zmian, aby wyjaśnić, co edytujesz i jakie było źródło. „1” nikomu niczego nie wyjaśnia.

Jeśli masz jakiekolwiek pytania, napisz do Grupy Roboczej ds. Danych OSM na adres data@osmfoundation.org.

Z poważaniem,

Andy Townsend, w imieniu grupy roboczej OSM ds. Danych.
AndyB_66 (2020-08-31 13:17:05+00:00): Nie wprowadzaj zmian, które nie mają odzwierciedlenia w rzeczywistości, a dotyczą stanu docelowego po zakończeniu budowy. Robisz to ponownie dokładnie w tym samym miejscu i dokładnie w ten sam bezsensowny sposób, co użytkownik "rifoxedek", który za takie działanie dostał już bana. Widzę, że jesteś jego alter ego - nie próbuj znowu realizować tu swoich chorych fantazji, bo tak samo zostaniesz zablokowany.
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2020-09-02 14:42:49+00:00): Hello Tylerchill,

My name is Yulya and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
On August 24, 2020  I mapped  the motorway link w840158597 https://osmcha.org/changesets/89854397/ based on Maxar imagery and Mapillary photos dated 2019 that suit Maxar imagery. Also in the area of mapping there is a new road according to Maxar imagery and there is Mapillary for this road dated 2020. 
On August 28, 2020 you changed the geometry of this link according to Mapbox aerial imagery. Such geometry also suits Bing streetside photos 2014. It seems to me that the data that I used is more up-to-date.
Could you please check your edits? Please let me know if you have any further questions or evidence that could help me to understand your point in this case. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90086505
Snoopy 617snoopy617617617 (2020-09-25 21:42:04+00:00): Murdock terr is it private or not?
luisforte (2020-08-28 14:53:50+00:00): Creio que se trata da Ermida de São Brás, https://www.cm-estremoz.pt/pagina/turismo/ermida-de-sao-bras
tarta (2020-08-28 16:11:27+00:00): Boa tarde Ganso-aju, é uma boa prática da comunidade colocar os nomes sem abreviação.
Martin Borsje (2020-08-28 15:08:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Edit ziet er goed uit!
trigpoint (2020-08-28 15:14:16+00:00): Hi, in order for routers to use this road you need the connect it to the track.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2020-08-28 15:11:07+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

In OSM names are used for the actual name of an object. In this case the name of this footpath is not Offa's Dyke Path but it is part of the long distance path. Long distance routes are mapped as relations and this path is already part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9649

It is also part of The Severn Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/112738

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2020-08-28 15:13:01+00:00): Same as the previous comment, it is already part of The Severn Way relation.

Cheers Phil
eggie (2020-08-28 16:07:21+00:00): Walter.. je zou evt. de twee stukken netjes kunnen laten aansluiten door de polygonen te verbinden. Ook dat gaat met josm denk ik makkelijker.
Daar zitten allerlei tools in omdat snel te doen. 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-08-30 08:20:39+00:00): PB contact
trigpoint (2020-08-29 15:42:27+00:00): Hi
Please do not copy from recent OS maps, they are copyright and we are not allowed to use them.

Also you seem to have not taken on board my comments on how long distance paths are mapped as relations.

Cheers Phil
Singe68 (2020-08-29 21:49:11+00:00): Many apologies!  I got a little carried away. I only went on OpenStreetMap to edit a couple of ways because there were gaps that were causing Strava and Komoot all kinds of grief. I will refrain from adding names unnecessarily. However, if there is a path on the ground can I add it if it is missing? (If there is a path on the ground, how can we indicate it is suitable for foot, horses and bikes - i.e. a bridleway - without causing OS copyright issues?) Genuine question. I'm not trying to be awkward.  (I suspect I just need to spend a few more hours reading all the OSM guides...)