piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-06-26 17:10:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Snusmumriken (2019-07-05 10:44:06+00:00): Är det här verkligen en butik? Dvs. en butik där vem som helst kan komma in från gatan för att köpa saker på plats?
Zero Waste Stockholm (2019-07-08 12:00:51+00:00): Hi,

We struggle a bit to find the good category for this place. The concept is the order are done online and can be either delivered home or be pick-up at this place. What would you set as a category? Thanks.
Snusmumriken (2019-07-08 14:04:25+00:00): I think office is the most appropriate.
datendelphin (2019-07-14 15:23:37+00:00): Danke für die Aktualisierungen. Was ist PAZ? Ich finde keinen Hinweis, dass diese Route nicht mehr von der Postauto AG betrieben wird. Ich bin sehr frustiert über die unnötige Komplexität von stop_position und platform, und dann noch unnötig die Platform als Linie zeichnen.
sovereign_ch (2019-07-15 15:11:54+00:00): PAZ ist (war?) seit 1990 (Geschäftsaufnahme des ZVV) das gängige Kürzel für Postauto Zürich. Ab "Ausgliederung" aus der Post (2006), bis vor einigen Tagen lautete die volle Bezeichnung "PostAuto Schweiz AG, Region Zürich", seit 5. Juni offenbar "PostAuto AG, Region Zürich". Die Postauto-Konzessionen sind beim BAV ebenfalls nach Regionen gruppiert.

Persönlich bin ich mit dem tagging-Schema recht zufrieden, es eignet sich einfach nicht, um schnell irgendwas hinzuklatschen. ;-) Platform ist im Grunde optional – da Mapnik PTv2 nicht rendert ziehe ich bei guten Luftbildern Linien mit PTv1-tag vor, das gibt dann auch einen besseren Eindruck von der Strassenbreite. Im ländlichen Raum wo nur eine regionaltypische Stele steht, natürlich ein ziemlicher Overkill. In Zürich, wo die Kantenhöhen rund 35 cm (Tram) bzw. 25 cm (Züri-Board für Bus) betragen, hat man gleich potentielle Stolperfallen markiert, wo man Fahrbahn/Haltestelle besser nicht überqueren sollte... oder die Türe vom tiefliegenden Liebkind eine neue Form erhält, wenn man sie dort zu öffnen versucht.
datendelphin (2019-07-15 19:38:20+00:00): Das mit dem PAZ scheint aber eher Insider Wissen zu sein. Es gibt nur zwei mapper, die PAZ mappen. Und in den didok Daten des BAV heisst es PAG: https://didok.osm.ch/?uic=8573734#16:47.2785:8.4659 Ich hoffe die Datenkonsumenten sind da flink genug, PAZ nach Postauto zu übersetzen. (Da kommt mir die Idee, dass wir eigentlich eine wiki Seite machen sollten, welche alle öv operators in plaintext und Website übersetzt)
Ich finde es schade, dass die bus_stop alle auf die Strasse verschoben werden. Ich hatte mir da noch mühe gegeben, die neben die Strasse zu legen je nach Richtung, das sieht dann auch schöner aus auf der Karte. Die Wege als "Symbol" für die Bushaltestelle ist doch einfach mapping für den renderer. Und auch das ist verwirrend, da die Wegstummel unverbunden sind zum restlichen Wegenetz.
Tomas Straupis (2019-06-26 19:56:01+00:00): In Lithuania we use original OpenStreetMap water tagging scheme with landuse=basin|reservoir.
Discostu36 (2020-03-06 11:48:10+00:00): Wenn du Bürgersteige separat mappst, dann denke bitte auch daran, die entsprechenden Straßen auf sidewalk=separate zu ändern.
Syl (2019-06-27 23:58:21+00:00): Bonjour, qu'est-ce que c'est ?
Yamaric (2019-06-28 07:07:31+00:00): Bonjour,

En fait c'est un poteau qui bloquent le passage ; il y a à côté un panneau d'interdiction à tous les véhicules motorisés.
Je ne sais pas comment le signaler autrement (j'utilise Maps.me comme GPS sur ma tablette).

Cordialement
Syl (2019-06-28 09:50:22+00:00): En effet Maps.me ne propose que des options d'édition très limitée. Pour pouvoir faire des modifications plus précises vous pouvons par exemple utiliser l'éditeur iD disponible en cliquant sur le bouton "Modifier" en haut du site openstreetmap.org.
Actuellement le poteau est renseigné comme étant une administration publique (en plus du fait que "Poteau" n'est pas son nom). La catégorie barrière, type bollard conviendrait mieux.
Syl (2019-06-30 16:32:43+00:00): Je viens de le corriger, n'hésitez pas à modifier si ce n'est pas correct.
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-27 06:48:58+00:00): Hi hadi52585258, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting many mapped ways? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71629262

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
Sosha1996 (2019-06-27 23:38:58+00:00): hey @pitscheplatsch

this user is a saboteur.
this account alternative account for amina63

we reported amina63 for vandalism and will be report this account for vandalism too.

Best Regards,
Sosha Mosleh
Sosha1996 (2019-06-28 00:25:49+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف زیادی از داده‌های نقشه کرده‌اید.
داده‌هایی که حذف کردید شامل معابر، خطوط برق، ساختمان‌ها و رود‌ها میشود.
به دلیل حذف عمده‌ی داده‌های نقشه، نام شما در لیست سیاه OSM Iran قرار گرفته.
تمام تغییرات شما در چنجست‌های: 
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.
برگردانده شد و  حساب شما به عنوان خرابکار گزارش شد.
همچنین ما اطلاع داریم حساب قبلی شما هم مسدود شده گرچه اون مسدودیت موقت بوده:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

سوشا مصلح
از OSM Iran
----------------------------
You removed a lot of data from the map.
The data you removed include buildings, streams, crossing, and power lines.
Due to the deletion of large data from the map, your name is on the blacklist of OSM Iran.
your account will be reported as a vandalism and your changeset reverted:
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.

we know your account ban from site:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

Sosha Mosleh,
from OSM Iran.

(by online translator)
Sosha1996 (2019-06-28 00:25:52+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف زیادی از داده‌های نقشه کرده‌اید.
داده‌هایی که حذف کردید شامل معابر، خطوط برق، ساختمان‌ها و رود‌ها میشود.
به دلیل حذف عمده‌ی داده‌های نقشه، نام شما در لیست سیاه OSM Iran قرار گرفته.
تمام تغییرات شما در چنجست‌های: 
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.
برگردانده شد و  حساب شما به عنوان خرابکار گزارش شد.
همچنین ما اطلاع داریم حساب قبلی شما هم مسدود شده گرچه اون مسدودیت موقت بوده:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

سوشا مصلح
از OSM Iran
----------------------------
You removed a lot of data from the map.
The data you removed include buildings, streams, crossing, and power lines.
Due to the deletion of large data from the map, your name is on the blacklist of OSM Iran.
your account will be reported as a vandalism and your changeset reverted:
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.

we know your account ban from site:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

Sosha Mosleh,
from OSM Iran.

(by online translator)
mavl (2019-06-26 17:06:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:10:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:09:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:09:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:08:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:10:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:08:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:09:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:08:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:10:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:07:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:10:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:09:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:08:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:09:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:08:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:10:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-26 17:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71645298 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
Leo Slager (2019-06-26 22:27:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Sosha1996 (2019-06-28 00:25:56+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف زیادی از داده‌های نقشه کرده‌اید.
داده‌هایی که حذف کردید شامل معابر، خطوط برق، ساختمان‌ها و رود‌ها میشود.
به دلیل حذف عمده‌ی داده‌های نقشه، نام شما در لیست سیاه OSM Iran قرار گرفته.
تمام تغییرات شما در چنجست‌های: 
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.
برگردانده شد و  حساب شما به عنوان خرابکار گزارش شد.
همچنین ما اطلاع داریم حساب قبلی شما هم مسدود شده گرچه اون مسدودیت موقت بوده:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

سوشا مصلح
از OSM Iran
----------------------------
You removed a lot of data from the map.
The data you removed include buildings, streams, crossing, and power lines.
Due to the deletion of large data from the map, your name is on the blacklist of OSM Iran.
your account will be reported as a vandalism and your changeset reverted:
71662376, 71661991, 71661853, 71661559, 71661484, 71630435, 71629423, 71629262, 71627308, 71626853, 71626523, 71626095, 71625895, 71625819, 71625618, 71426514, 71425212, 71424942, 71424518, 71395115, 71387533, 71126795, 71126774, 71126690, 71089481, 71089276, 71089041, 71088902, 71088799, 71088686,
71088308, 71088228.

we know your account ban from site:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2796

Sosha Mosleh,
from OSM Iran.

(by online translator)
archie (2019-06-26 10:47:14+00:00): Byggnaderna syns alltjämt på satelitbilderna. I sådana fall brukar man använda lifecycle-tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) för att undvika att någon annan användare ritar in dem på nytt. Jag har reverterat ändringssetet och försett byggnaderna med ett (av flera möjliga) lifecycle-tags.
DD1GJ (2019-06-27 06:21:45+00:00): Hello, with the app MAPS.ME you are editing a wordwide high quality geo database. please do not  add private travel  POI.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/about
ndm (2019-06-28 22:20:54+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337967806 really called "57"
SimonM182 (2019-06-29 10:34:03+00:00): Yes. Hence the addition.
ndm (2019-06-29 17:46:12+00:00): Well it could have been number, rather than name?
sannkc (2019-06-27 00:41:37+00:00): Hello, I have reverted this changeset.  The building added in your changeset duplicated an already existing building and did not accurately depict conditions on the ground.  Please do not add non-existent buildings or duplicate already existing buildings in OSM. (Revert changeset #71654943)
Cascafico (2019-06-26 12:03:06+00:00): Ciao Daniele,
come suggerito anche da StefanB, non è necessario name:it se esiste già old_name:it. ("old_name:x tag should not require the presence of name:x tag").
Inoltre inserisci il name:it solo se riportato dalla segnaletica in loco, o se viene citato dai siti istituzionali (p. es: buzet.hr)
Gh0stz0x (2019-06-26 18:16:24+00:00): Concordo con Cascafico. Perché lo inserisci in name:it?
danieledvx (2019-06-26 21:32:02+00:00): First of all there were many tags name:*. Then someone moved name:* in old_name:*. And now I restored name:*. So the real point is why to remove name:* for old_name and not the opposite.
Then, Cascafico, you are speaking about one specific situation: official multilingual area. And in this case, sure, you have multilingual signs, multilingual official websites and, furthermore, you have also something like name=name_lang_1 / name_lang_2 / name_lang_3, ... Are we in this situation? No. So, another case. Which one? Places who have names in other languages. Which places? Every type of place: town, village, river, mountain, sea, gulf, ... so why do you focus only on cities? Are there signs near a sea? Signs are only in cities, but openstreetmap is not only for cities. It's a completely generic speech. Any entity can have a multilingual name. for historical, reasons, for cultural reasons, ... Italian is a so rich language, full of literature. We haven't to be so barbaric to remove information if we don't know them. There's a possibility to have a lot of information here, so better to add them, not to remove them. What about languages like Latin? Tag name:la is used. Why a name like Lipizza should be removed? Open an Italian dictionary (like Treccani, Garzanti), search for lipizzano and you will find Lipizza. Open some Italian atlas, you will find Italian names. Clearly is not so easy to find Italian names for small villages, but it's a consequence of their size (it does not mean they are no more used).
Let me ask you a question: why don't you go to Alsace villages and move name:de to old_name:de?
Gh0stz0x (2019-06-26 22:00:48+00:00): From what I understand, they are names given after the "April War" and therefore of historical origin.  The problem is knowing if they are still used or not.  The wiki says that in old_name "The tag old_name = * is used for old / previous / historic name (s) for an element".  The tag with the date namespace is also interesting
 old_name: 1921-1932 * =.  Who knows the real situation are the local mappers.
Cascafico (2019-06-27 10:10:28+00:00): Daniele, nobody wants to remove old names, but just placing them in the  appropriate tag. Please,  recognize that palacing it in old_name will add further information in OSM, such as name *was* used, name is *not* in use anymore, on-site signs do *not* report it. 
If you are worried about routing engines, nominatim will find old_name anyway.
If you are worried about rendering, I have to remind you that OSM guidelines state "Don't deliberately enter data incorrectly for the renderer".
danieledvx (2019-06-27 10:43:40+00:00): Oh, no, I'm not worried about rendering. I never said anything about this point. And I agree, old_name gives more information than name if a name is no more used. It's a more detailed tag, sure. But if (I want to underline "if") it is no more used, obsolete, ... The point is these names are actually used. Ok, maybe in one, two centuries they will be no more used, but it's not the actual situation. So  tag old_name is a wrong tag in this cases.
Andreas Lattmann, some name was officially given after they were part of Italy, in particular for some small villages, but big ones had always had Italian and German names. Sometimes it was a matter of pronunciation, like this one: Brestovizza is how you write in Italian and Brestovica in Slovenian, but they have the same pronunciation (so Italians called them in the same way also before an official act).
Remember all openstreetmap border areas have multilingual names. Moving to old_name only in this region is not coherent, nor correct.
StefanB (2019-06-27 11:33:33+00:00): old_name is trivial with official administrative renames (eg streets, towns) in official language(s).

It is a bit more fuzzy when it comes to unofficial languages in the region, having no street signs, no mention in recent official documents, no news about it... 

Could you ask yourselves what percentage of nearby Italian population (excluding historians & geographers) would know what village you are talking about if you mention it by its Italian name?
What name would the Italian main stream media use if a major world event happened there? (eg a plane with 200 country presidents onboard crashes into the middle of that village) 

A similar example with archaic name of a major European city - only few living Slovenes would know what is the city of "Monakovo", but OSM understands it and helps us:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=monakovo#map=12/48.1550/11.5418
Also the Slovenian news are referring to it by its native name, not the archaic Slovenian name.
danieledvx (2019-06-27 13:25:11+00:00): Ok, Munich, so https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/62428
All name=* and one old_name:sl. Do you really think it is correct? I find it a little bit curious, but I don't know Slovenian, so I cannot say anything (but I asked some Slovenian friend and they said they know it).
About your question, in case of a disaster... yes Italian media would use its Italian name. And this is exactly the point. It's not a dead name. Maybe in future, but not nowadays.
Gh0stz0x (2019-06-27 13:40:35+00:00): ok, I thought they were names given during the occupation and no longer used.  Then it is correct to put them in name: it.  Thanks for the explanations.

@StefanB 
>What name would the Italian main stream media >use if a major world event happened there? (eg >a plane with 200 country presidents onboard >crashes into the middle of that village)

I don't think that not knowing a name from the foreign press necessarily means putting it in old_name.  If I ask an Italian where San Maurizio is also known as San Murezzan in Switzerland, they look at me like a cow staring at the passing train 😂.  If I say St. Moritz everyone knows where it is.  And yet San Murezzan is in name: rm San Maurizio in name: it and St. Moritz in shot_name.  StefanB, are you a local mapper?  and you danieledvx?  Who is a local mapper knows better than me, if they are names still in force or not.