piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
totera (2021-11-19 20:48:07+00:00): Ciao fedc, railway=preserved è un tag problematico perché impedisce di esprimere quello che dovrebbe essere il valore di railway (rail, narrow_gauge, tram, ecc.), e pur non essendo stato ancora deprecato è sempre meno usato in favore di railway:preserved=yes (https://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/railway/preserved&***/railway:preserved/yes)
opendcc (2022-04-27 07:19:07+00:00): Sind die Radwege um Poing rum auch für Fußgänger offen - vermutlich schon, oder?
miche101 (2022-04-27 07:52:39+00:00): Ja also das sind alles Fuß und Radwege normalerweise. Teilweise war mal die Gemeinde Poing der Meinung dass die fahrradfahrer auf der Straße sicherer sind und dann waren es nur Fußwege Punkt mittlerweile aufgrund des Baus der Schule ist mir jetzt wieder zu der Meinung gekommen dass die fahrradfahrer doch jetzt auf dem Fuß und Radweg wieder sicherer sind. Ja das müsste man sich alles noch mal anschauen. Aber habe da jetzt keine großes Interesse daran ;-)
woodpeck (2021-10-28 13:38:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997173336 does not look like an actual trail, more like a coarse, uplaoded GPX track! I cannot see anything on the aerial imagery either. What is the source if this alleged "bike trail"?
HPman83 (2021-10-28 14:47:17+00:00): It's a brand new single track open for mountain biking. The GPX is coming from my GPS when I rode the trail.
https://www.trailforks.com/ridelog/view/26241265/
Renard Empiriste (2021-11-13 13:22:43+00:00): you are using Openstreetmap wrong!  It is not made for storing personal bike trails but for helping tracing existing trails and roads.    
a highway=cycleway  is a separate marked cycling lane in a city.  
Why do you also add "one ways" to your tracks? There is no such thing as a one way in a forest. This totally screws up the routing for everyone else.  Add the slope information up/down to a trail.
aixbrick (2021-10-28 14:16:50+00:00): Du hast hier jetzt aus der "3 B" eine "3" gemacht, wodurch die Nr. weiterhin doppelt ist. Und bitte kein Leerzeichen zwischen "3" und "a" (schau dir mal andere Adressen mit Buchstaben in der Region an).
Es ist übrigens nicht zwangsläufig so, dass derjenige nördlich von "3" eine eigene Hausnr. haben muss. Das kann auch nur ein Anbau mit eigenem Eingang sein.
EneaSuper (2021-10-28 13:34:09+00:00): Ciao, hai sbagliato a denominare il piazzale:

È sufficiente la parte "Piazzale Bartolomeo Decotto", magari il resto lo puoi inserire nel tag "description=" 🙂
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:57:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Negreheb (2021-11-02 12:10:11+00:00): Durch ein paar Renderfehler gerade sehr verwundert gewesen :D

Danke, dass du hier weitergemacht hast, ich hatte durch die Edit-Wars jetzt mal längere Zeit ausgesetzt. 
(Spannend, als augenscheinlich neuer Nutzer gleich JOSM und zache Aufgaben erledigen :D )
AT6380 (2021-11-13 06:09:27+00:00): Lieber Besucher 
den Leinenzwangbereich der Marktgemeinde St. Johann in Tirol way/805283937 findest Du ab sofort unter folgendem Link: https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1whiH_16FndsRZCidrJTQfdVghrKdIVb5&amp%3Busp=sharing&ll=47.52498434579603%2C12.425010386108397&z=15
Martin Borsje (2021-10-28 19:12:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Adalberto D'Alessandri (2021-10-28 13:52:17+00:00): questo giro prevede un incursione a campo secco, per poi rientrare a campobuffone per campaegli
Alecs01 (2021-10-29 13:52:44+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap. Se quello è un percorso segnalato deve essere inserita una relazione https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking o https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dmtb non sovrapporre una strada a quelle esistenti.
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-29 07:20:54+00:00): Taip, viskas čia gerai pažymėta. Šitas išskirtinis tuo, kad beveik pastoviai ten kažkas yra ir ugnį kūrena.
Frans S (2021-11-02 16:08:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Good job. 
Just 1 remark. Your mappings are often oversized. Please try to map more accurate.
Best regards and keep mapping
Bonjour. Merci pour la cartographie ici
Bon travail. 
Juste une remarque. Vos cartographies sont souvent surdimensionnées. S'il vous plaît essayer de cartographier plus précis.
Meilleures salutations et continuez à cartographier
Frans S (2021-11-02 16:15:18+00:00): Voici un aperçu de certains des changements que j'ai apportés. Cherchez la légende pour plus d'informations.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113292310
Best regards
gurglypipe (2021-10-28 15:20:36+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM.

The tagging for the Underpass was actually correct before: it used the conditional access tagging scheme described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Access_time_and_other_conditional_restrictions to say that motor vehicles other than buses aren’t allowed 08:00-20:00.

The fact the motor_vehicle= tag wasn’t set was confusing, though, so I’ve changed it to set motor_vehicle=no by default, and made the conditional access yes between 20:00-08:00. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113087136

Thanks for your edits, and please do continue to edit :)
ivanbranco (2021-10-31 14:37:57+00:00): Ciao Cammis, ho visto che hai richiesto la revisione del changeset. Da Wiki viene specificato che "via", così come "strada", "piazza" ecc. deve sempre essere scritto con l'iniziale maiuscola :) Buon mapping
aixbrick (2021-10-28 15:27:21+00:00): Danke :-)
gendy54 (2021-12-22 20:12:19+00:00): Bonjour Eric,

On m'a signalé sur le forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/une-bonne-ame-pour-corriger-une-erreur-sur-osm/6641/5) un pb de landuse. A priori, ca viendrait de chez toi. Je te mets l'endroit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9207868927#map=16/45.3763/3.5930
Si tu le sais pas le réparer, dis le moi.

Donat
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
mariotomo (2021-10-29 20:55:00+00:00): Hola! "to contribute to the enrichment of my district", a very effective way not available to remote mappers, you could contribute names of points of interest. Like shops, restaurants, and all sorts of services that one finds in a town like Aguadulce! Thanks for anything you manage to add to our database!
mariotomo (2021-10-29 20:57:03+00:00): Oh, sorry, veo que es lo que hiciste. Comenté basado en el comentario, no en el contenido.
mariotomo (2021-10-30 17:10:33+00:00): mejoré unos errores (calles sobrepuestas y nombres descriptivos). tenemos un foro y un grupo, eres muy bienvenido! 
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113085784
literan (2021-10-28 17:28:16+00:00): это не имя собственное.

тег lit=yes на дорожке уже стоял
adreamy (2024-07-06 08:39:20+00:00): 이 주변의 통로는 '보행자 거리'보다는 '보도'(사람이 다닐 수 있도록 만든 통로)에 가깝다고 보여서 바꾸었습니다.
OSM 위키 문서를 참조해 주시거나 좀 헷갈릴 때는 커뮤니티(공식, 텔레그램 등)에서 함께 상의해 주시면 고맙겠습니다.
adreamy (2024-07-06 08:39:56+00:00): 지방행정연수원 주변 통로를 고쳤습니다.
PT-53 (2021-11-07 12:38:12+00:00): Hallo fx99,
wie lange soll die neue Sperrung andauern?
Siehe
http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=18/8.95317/48.66077&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/tertiarynew.json
Grüße
fx99 (2021-11-07 14:20:11+00:00): Lt. https://verkehrsinfo-bw.de/baustelle?id=2056842_2056843_2056846_gegen noch bis 17.12.21
Wg. Bauarbeiten auf der A81 war sie wohl kurzfristig übre ein WE freigegeben, danach wieder gesperrt. Es gibt auch noch einiges an Arbeit.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
hasienda (2024-04-10 14:14:18+00:00): partially reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149821579 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149821791
due to misleading re-tagging, that even led to rendering issue of (outside) basin green instead of blue
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
abrensch (2022-01-30 13:17:26+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,

ich glaube hier hattest Du den Sumpfweg und den begleitenden Radweg teilweise gelöscht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547119571

Schaust Du mal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
Geofreund1 (2022-01-30 15:59:23+00:00): Hallo Arndt,
danke für den Hinweis, allerdings fühle ich mich unschuldig. Die Löschung stammt von hs75 mit dem Vermerk "gibt es nicht mehr". Änderungssatz: 113335640 und 113335579
Gruß
Geofreund1
Geofreund1 (2022-01-30 16:01:30+00:00): Übrigens gibt es dort ein neues Gebäude (Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta))
GerdP (2022-08-08 09:49:51+00:00): Moin!
Bin gestern hier lang geradelt und bin jetzt ganz überrascht, dass da ein Tunnel gemappt ist. Für mich war das ganz klar eine Autobahnbrücke. Wieso hast Du das geändert?
Geofreund1 (2022-08-08 12:54:22+00:00): Wenn eine Straße als bridge eingetragen ist, sollte der Weg darunter nicht noch als tunnel gemappt sein. Genau das war dort der Fall. Ich habe mich damals dafür entschieden, die bridge zu löschen und den tunnel vervollständigt. 
Wenn dir das nicht gefällt: bitte ändern.
GerdP (2022-08-08 13:02:30+00:00): Schon passiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124639672
blackboxlogic (2021-10-31 03:23:14+00:00): FYI this address already existed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7344139075) so now there are two elements with this address. When adding buildings and copying address details to it, please delete the address node.
blackboxlogic (2021-10-31 03:21:43+00:00): FYI this address already existed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7179448134) so now there are two elements with this address. When adding buildings and copying address details to it, please delete the address node.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2021-10-31 17:18:43+00:00): Dag Koen..
Wat er niet meer is kan uiterard we, behalve dan het adres. 
 Probeer bedrijven, café's e.d bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Dus niet nogmaals een adres aanmaken.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113088270

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-01 13:35:58+00:00): Dag Koen,
Windkracht 8  samengevoegd met adresnode.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-11-01 13:39:07+00:00): Winkel 90 gr oost een shop tag gegeven en losgemaakt van de gebouwomtrek. 
gr eggie
Dodko (2021-10-29 15:29:13+00:00): Dohodlo sa, že slovo ulica do názvu ulice nedávame.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/NEJlJhUbhWA/m/QZgF71ZpBwAJ
Rick Richards (2021-10-29 17:47:28+00:00): Vďaka za info, budem si na to dávať pozor.
Leo Slager (2021-10-28 21:35:18+00:00): Dag ntkc,
De camping en de adres-gegevens staan nu driemaal op de kaart.
Binnen OSM worden die zaken dus principieel slechts éénmaal op de kaart gezet.
Het is in dit geval beter om de omtrek van de camping in te tekenen. Specifieke gegevens kunnen dan op die omtrek worden bij getagd. Op de plaats van de ingang kan dan bijvoorbeeld een node worden gezet met entrance=main.
Als het niet lukt kan ik je daar wel bij helpen.
Ars-UA (2021-10-28 16:32:13+00:00): Тут адреса идут по территории, а не по улице, поэтому домам нужно добавить тег 
addr:place=Коксовий масив или 
addr:place=Мартенівський масив
Без этих тегов номера домов просто висят в воздухе и адресация не работает.
boris84 (2022-01-01 12:30:12+00:00): Спасибо за совет. Сегодня исправил.
marc__marc (2024-08-05 13:29:27+00:00): Bonjour,
pourquoi avez-vous ajouté survey:date sur l'import des adresses ?
si cela vient du RegBl, vous ne les avez pas vu sur le terrain. et surement pas vu toute le même jour à la même heure et même minute
Cordialement,
Marc
Martin Borsje (2021-10-28 19:09:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
confusedbuffalo (2021-10-29 11:54:00+00:00): Garages don't really have addresses, so I've removed those tags here. Do add addresses to any of the nearby buildings if you know them though
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Kovoschiz (2021-10-29 04:41:52+00:00): This is not the correct solution. An "inaccessible" feature still exists. You should add a `barrier=gate` as the physical obstruction, and `access=private` for the legal rule. 
In the process you deleted the intersection for the opposing roads together.
ovruni (2021-10-28 21:26:57+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha eliminado una vía que tenía entre sus etiquetas el valor de building=yes, al hacer esto se esta diciendo no solo que la comisaría ya no existe aquí, sino que también el edificio en este lugar ya no existe, lo cual es poco probable cuando un establecimiento cambia de lugar. Por este motivo he recuperado la vía, pero sin las etiquetas que hacían referencia a la comisaría.
Saludos
Fer25 (2021-10-28 21:33:09+00:00): Gracias, no había tomado en cuenta eso
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 09:46:31+00:00): Hello!

You used
artwork_type=buste
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7396275566

Have you maybe meant
artwork_type=bust
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Fabe56 (2024-01-29 15:08:59+00:00): Nice catch, my OSM UI is in french and by list propose Buste. Looks like it does not match it with the English term: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:memorial=buste
vulasala (2021-10-29 04:47:33+00:00): Hi Nattyzx,
Trust you are doing well. I have aligned the node 2053011453 which is dragged and aligned the as per the ground truth.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113089865
haukep (2021-10-29 07:59:05+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

For a building like this that hosts multiple amenities/offices/etc., you choose the exactly correct approach of mapping the point of interest ((here: the music school) as a node situated within the boundaries of the building.

The only question in such situations is: Should you add the address to BOTH the point of interest AND to the building? Or should you only add it to the building? This is an open topic, so you may see both approaches "in the wild". (But no need to change it in your edit.)

Happy mapping. :-)

By the way: As Münster is located in Germany, many Münsteranian editors write comments and notes in German. Feel free to choose whatever of the two languages suits you best.
LoungingPrimate (2021-11-01 12:16:44+00:00): Ah. Das ist gut zu wissen XD.

Und ersteres ist auch gut zu lesen.

Danke für die Bestätigung und überhaupt auch die schnelle Antwort.

Likewise XD
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-29 07:23:44+00:00): Na visų pirma, tai mokyklos ploto apibrėžimas nėra nei geresnis, nei blogesnis žymėjimas. Žymi tie, kam to iš tikrųjų reikia. Bet, jei jau pažymėtas plotas amenity=scool, tai negali būti vienoje vietoje DVI mokyklos (dabar amenity=scool) yra ir pastatas pažymėtas. Gaunasi dvi mokyklos, viena be pavadinimo. Tai JEI tikrai dėl kažko reikia plotą žymėti, tada reikia visas mokyklos žymas perkelti plotui, prie adreso pridėti žymą addr:contact=yes ir tada pastatui palikti tik building ir adreso žymas (nuimti amenity, name žymas).
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-29 07:24:42+00:00): Greta darželis yra pažymėtas plotu, galima „nusižiūrėti“ :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
4004 (2021-11-22 00:22:16+00:00): они уже названы
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Martin Borsje (2021-10-28 19:09:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2021-10-28 21:54:46+00:00): Alleen de naam toevoegen zal niet renderen op de kaart.
Ik heb office=company toegevoegd.
literan (2021-10-28 17:22:26+00:00): эти теги лишние: bicycle=yes
foot=yes
horse=yes

почему - написано у меня в профиле
Frans S (2021-11-03 11:51:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Something went wrong here.
You mapped 225 buildings twice.
Was this an import job?
I removed the duplicated buildings
Best regards
NM$L (2021-10-28 17:04:30+00:00): Both Shiquanhe Town and Gar County set the government there. So Gar is not Shiquanhe. ( #ReH )
NM$L (2021-10-28 17:11:43+00:00): Chinese city form is usually different from that of other country. So in OSM, we always map cities, towns and villages according to their administrative level and place the nodes at the government building site. Check the OSM wiki to learn more.
Frans S (2021-12-03 15:49:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key, You missed 6 out of 7.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113091134
_MAPWEL_ (2021-10-28 17:18:10+00:00): I live around here, please do not make changes to this unless you know this area
PT-53 (2022-04-19 06:34:34+00:00): Hallo wermak,
besteht die Sperrung der B 378 dort noch?
Ich kann im Internet nichts dazu finden.
Fragende Grüße
wermak (2022-04-26 05:43:58+00:00): Brücke ist seit 14.04.2022 wieder frei, https://rp.baden-wuerttemberg.de/rpf/service/presse/pressemitteilungen/artikel/rheinbruecke-zwischen-neuenburg-am-rhein-und-chalampe-ist-puenktlich-zur-landesgartenschau-wieder-offen/. Danke fürs Erinnern.

Schöne Grüße
Andrei Lazarev (2021-10-28 17:49:33+00:00): Добавил заказник «Сейдъявврь»
jodd (2021-10-28 17:49:53+00:00): Falscher Changeset-Kommentar von mir. Richtig muss es heißen:

Gedenkstein eingetragen nach Hinweis
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2887894
TravGW (2022-02-13 17:17:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted, no golf course here.

This is a real world map that many people depend on. Please do not make fictional edits.
Josef73 (2023-04-21 08:08:29+00:00): What do you mean with hashtags:#Kaart?
murr999888 (2021-10-29 10:19:31+00:00): Теперь тут два дома №79?
dreiblum (2021-12-09 16:43:49+00:00): Hallo, durch die Eintragung von Fußwegen ist jetzt das Routing kaputt gegangen. siehe Beispiel: http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=17/51.10963/13.75425/osm-mapnik-german_style,Waymarked_Trails-Cycling&lonlats=13.753644,51.110807;13.752673,51.110396;13.752072,51.10984&profile=trekking-ignore-cr

Kann man das wieder reparieren?
LG dreiblum
cserpell (2021-10-29 14:07:57+00:00): Eliminé este parque, lo marqué como zona residencial.
flabra_OSM (2021-10-29 16:33:51+00:00): Hola! Muchas gracias, si muy bien, solo agregué este polígono como ejemplo para el uso de la aplicación en una clase. Se podría borrar incluso si es necesario. Quedo atento!
cserpell (2021-10-29 17:53:41+00:00): Interesante, si quieres puedes unirte a la comunidad chilena en telegram @OSMcl para cmpartir con los demás que participan en el mapa, resolver dudas y contar de lo que haces. También hay una lista de correos y página de facebook y twitter en https://www.openstreetmap.cl/ .

Saludos,
flabra_OSM (2021-10-29 18:25:49+00:00): Genial, me uniré y les cuento un poco más. Mientras comento que realizo mi doctorado en estos temas, por lo cual creo que puedo aportar. Así mismo recibir sus comentarios! Muchas gracias
ivanbranco (2021-11-10 20:35:27+00:00): Hi Igor,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997242863
sound crossing=yes is not a valid tag, but you can fix it with traffic_signals:sound=yes :)
joost schouppe (2021-12-01 16:46:32+00:00): You went a little quickly there: you removed the main highway tag on both the roads you touched. I already fixed it.
Pepilepioux (2021-12-01 20:54:15+00:00): Oups !
Sorry... Thanks for correcting.
FraukeLeo (2021-12-20 19:49:49+00:00): Hallo FirefighterCGH, offenbar hast du hier den Way der Staatsstraße, den ich als saubere Kurve gemappt habe, akribisch genau auf die jeweilige Fahrbahnmitte gezogen, wenn seitliche Abbiegespuren hinzukommen. Dazu gibt es aber eigentlich keinen Grund - einen Vorteil hat das für niemanden, und die Straße bekommt dadurch im Kartenbild lauter Knicke, die sie real überhaupt nicht hat. Ein OSM-Grundsatz lautet "Keep straight ways straigt", und für den durchfahrenden Verkehr ist das einfach eine gleichmäßige Kurve, die nicht andauernd fünf Meter nach links oder rechts springt. Mir hats vorher besser gefallen.