piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FlyTy (2019-12-17 18:05:29+00:00): Hello, moon_walker is no longer on the team so I’ll respond for them in this case. Thank you for pointing out the maxheight tag. It appears a prior editor created the tag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47554080) and moon_walker copied it.  However, it appears to be a mistake and I removed it.
LeTopographeFou (2019-12-17 18:31:08+00:00): Thank you for taking care of moon_walker changesets, your quick answer and the fix !
Gazer75 (2018-09-06 03:50:46+00:00): This is not how you add a place. Notsete is already there as a farm. Please read the wiki properly before you continue to edit.
R0bst3r (2018-09-06 11:35:28+00:00): Hallo YukonTramp,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Der "Name" des Grabens sollte allerdings wieder entfernt werden, da eigentlich eine Funktion (dafür sind die Tags da) oder Beschreibung ist (dafür ist der Key description da). Es werden nur Eigennnamen eingetragen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62324632
marc__marc (2020-03-09 12:31:55+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5885661619
it this a duplicate or a part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2332493686 Big Tesuque Campground
if you known the shape of the campground, feel free to improve it.
osmviborg (2018-09-05 21:36:20+00:00): Ankestyrelsen bor også her:
Nytorv 7, 2. sal, 9000 Aalborg
Jesper Mortensen (2018-09-05 22:08:19+00:00): Ja og på Teglholmsgade 3. Har selv været der flere gang og har flere tidligere kollegaer der sidder der ;-)

https://ast.dk/om-ankestyrelsen/kontakt-os
SomeoneElse (2018-09-06 08:19:00+00:00): One thing that might be missing is "the bit where people sit or stand at north and south without a roof".  That's tricky, because there isn't a 100% accepted way of tagging those in OSM.  There's "leisure=bleachers", as described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dbleachers , and discussed at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-April/035659.html etc., but this isn't really a British English word (which OSM normally uses for names, though there are exceptions).  See also https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3140 .  The problem is, there isn't really a good alternative.  An example of one that's been mapped with no main tag is at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188843321 .
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-06 08:43:50+00:00): Thank you very much for the information SomeoneElse. By the way, I've found a stadium which is added, but doesn't show up. Other buildings in the area also don't show up. Do you know what is wrong with it? This is the one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/40.67839/122.11570&layers=N
SomeoneElse (2018-09-06 09:10:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463862870#map=16/40.6800/122.1167&layers=N is mapped as one huge building, which may not be correct.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-06 09:36:08+00:00): Thanks again! I've fixed this error.
freebeer (2018-09-06 17:59:09+00:00): Be careful with the name you changed.
I am not familiar enough with turkish to know where to expect them, but the i-without-dot and I-with-dot, İ, see common use.
Here the Balıkesir is the city name and already is present in the address data as ı without a dot, but you have typed it instead as US-ASCII i.
It is my guess your spelling is inadvertently wrong, as a quick google fuzzy-match text search gives lots of the expected spelling.
I cannot otherwise vouch for your name change hours after the stadium had been edited by another, as i said, I don't know any turkish grammar whatsoever.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-06 19:37:42+00:00): Thanks for the hint, yes you're right about this. I've changed the name into "Balıkesir".
freebeer (2018-09-07 08:22:43+00:00): thanks.
comparing the geometry here against the mediocre available background imagery, there are a few niggling hints i can come up with, that you are free to reject as too petty.
.
the shape of the footie pitch and the stands looked to be slightly off of rectangular.  i selected the pitch in my editor and applied the quadrilateralise() function to give it right angles, and saw a slight change in geometry.  not much, but if you strive for perfection, you might want to get in the habit of applying the equivalent function in your editor (if not `q' then probably `s') to anything that should have right angles.
.
the same probably applies to the stands/roof.  although i cannot tell from the imagery if they are truly rectangular.
again, this is more icing-on-the-cake here than an actual visibly bad outline - plenty of other mappers are guilty of those.
.
now about the track outline, again a trivial detail, but by taking a bit more time to trace with additional points will result in smoother curves.  not a problem, just something that over time has increased my own satisfaction with my mapping.
.
you refer elsewhere in public that you have not wrapped your brane around the concept of a multipolygon relation yet.
once you do, the imagery makes it clear what is the track, and while here you have two overlapping pitches, ideally you would trace the inner track outline, then cut it out of the track outer, giving you the sort of result like, well, not nearby, but find a random mapped highschool in the urban us and many of them have a track multipolygon, surrounding a footie pitch.
.
how to tag the remaining green half-circles, well, i dunno, as i have a place in california i need to investigate, one mapped as pitch but the other not.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-11 07:28:26+00:00): Thank you for the information again freebeer :) (I saw you wrote this message a few days ago, I missed it for some reason).
ViriatoLusitano (2018-09-05 22:57:43+00:00): Hey Ирина007, we had to revert your changes because those items are already mapped and they must be in Portuguese. You can always use the Notes function of OSM if you wish to tell of any issue with the map, or lack of any feature.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%B8
Warin61 (2018-10-21 05:37:52+00:00): Hi,

The import has not checked for parks... 

For example 111 Malton Rd ... and 110X Malton Rd .. those are inside a National Park ... never likely to be any residence there.
viloan (2018-09-05 22:20:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2018-09-08 08:37:00+00:00): Hi,
No 362 Marsden Road .. no house there .. it is a park. The 362Rs can be removed around there too... Don't know if parks have addresses.

Going well?
Moult (2018-09-08 12:23:17+00:00): Thanks Warin! Yes, going well, and I think you're right. However before removing it I think it's best to check it out in person first. I see you live in the Epping area! Do you mind checking it out?

P.S. I live in Epping too.
Warin61 (2018-09-08 12:29:41+00:00): I have been past it several times. No houses. I have not seen a sign to say it is a park ..nor a name of the park. I'll have to stop and really look at it next time .. if I remember. It does form the function of a park.
Last time they were doing some works to the footpath there. It has been a while so that should have finished..
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-06 10:27:20+00:00): Boa dia Feliz,

Agradeço que responda às que coloquei há dois dias atrás e que siga as indicações que lá coloquei. Conforme mencionei, deve indicar o que alterou no mapa e não colocar a descrição "porque lá estive recentemente", que nada indica.

Caso esta situação persista, terei de reportar a sua conta.

Qualquer dúvida, conforme mencionado anteriormente, contacte-me ou comente este ou o outro conjunto de alterações, no qual indiquei uma série de diretrizes que deve adoptar para editar o mapa.

Cumprimentos

Nuno Caldeira
Feliz Pereira (2018-09-13 12:16:57+00:00): Embora tenha feito a estrada com linhas, tenho uma trilha que indica o trajeto correto do Caminho Casais de Cima da Rocha, que será ainda mais correto (dia 04 de setembro de 2018). Do Caminho da Fajã dos Rolos até ao Início desta estrada a superfície é alcatrão e não terra e gravila. se a trilha ficar visível posso assinalar o nome da rua corretamente depois.
maciek-szn (2018-09-06 12:40:19+00:00): Numery dróg, które nie widnieją na znakach drogowych (np. powiatowych) zasadniczo powinny trafiać nie do "ref", a do "unsigned_ref".
habi (2019-11-25 10:41:13+00:00): Ich wollte mir eine 3D-Ansicht der Höhe über Meer von Bern basteln, da sticht der Brunnen hier etwas raus.
Ist der Neuengassbrunnen wirklich nur 451 müm?
Hjart (2018-09-06 08:22:02+00:00): Please note that footways etc should always connect properly to roads they lead to. I've corrected it here.
forght (2018-09-06 20:08:23+00:00): Yes sorry for that and thanks for the correction.
highflyer74 (2018-09-10 15:15:10+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Richtiges Tagging von Objekten kannst im Wiki nachlesen (in diesem Fall https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoking).

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Auch möchte ich Dich zu unserem monatlichen OSM Treffen in Bremen einladen. Dort kann man nette Leute treffen und konkrete Fragen stellen. Neue Mapper sind immer willkommen. Informationen dazu gibt es hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Veranstaltungen

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
eggie (2018-09-06 06:36:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-09-06 06:38:33+00:00): Dag Zixon. OSM heeft zo z'n eigen regels. Begin nooit met access=no  Dat is het ronde witte bord met rode rand.
access=no dus beter weghalen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Zixon (2018-09-06 09:13:33+00:00): Bedankt! Ik heb het aangepast.
eggie (2018-09-06 09:28:50+00:00): Top!
aharvey (2018-09-06 00:09:32+00:00): Hi you could also add service=driveway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway and access=private (if it's not a public road)
pmansour (2018-09-06 06:24:17+00:00): Thanks, aharvey I'll do that.
pmansour (2018-09-06 06:26:18+00:00): It's actually a shared driveway with 6 or so other houses.  Is that still the best way to tag it?

cheers
Paul
aharvey (2018-09-06 06:43:03+00:00): I'd still say it's a driveway even if it's shared by multiple houses. It looks like it's an easement across all the properties, so access=private makes sense.
pmansour (2018-09-06 06:50:16+00:00): Thanks again.
ralley (2018-09-06 00:47:15+00:00): This changeset looks to have some problems: 1) the footpath is not connected to Chapel Road at the Western end; 2) The crossings with Quattro Avenue etc do not have nodes.  Both of these will result in routing issues. 1) would normally result in a warning in JOSM (at least it does for me)
perlywerly (2018-09-06 18:18:04+00:00): Hi ralley, 

I fixed all the issues in the following changeset 62351662. Thanks for catching this, it also revealed an issue with my josm tool regarding validations. Please feel free to look at my other changes and let me know if there are any other issues. 

Thank You
ika-chan! (2018-09-09 09:57:43+00:00): When we map national and provincial roads with substandard road conditions, we use the "surface" and "smoothness" tags. The reason I map national and provincial roads with the standard categories (secondary or higher), is because it is in the Greek law. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Greece/National_Road_Network.
eggie (2018-09-06 06:46:20+00:00): Zixon.. alle niet doorgaande straten kun je omtaggen naar highway=residential. 
Dat het nog op unclassified staat komt door een import vanuit kaartenmaker AND in 2007. 
Graag reactie
freebeer (2018-09-06 12:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62341760 where the changeset comment is: things that no longer exist and do not exist, do not get added to OSM.  there are historical maps for that purpose.  also, please use a meaningful changeset description, thanks.
joost schouppe (2018-11-17 13:40:06+00:00): Zoals je kan zien als je doorklikt op de relaties, is je aanpassing niet voldoende om dit helemaal goed te krijgen.
eggie (2018-09-06 06:44:03+00:00): access no graag verwijderen. Brandgangen kun je op access=private zetten om ongewenste routering te voorkomen. 
De gps zou je anders door alle brandgangen sturen.
Zixon (2018-09-06 09:20:16+00:00): Aangepast. Bedankt voor je feedback.
eggie (2018-09-06 09:33:04+00:00): Mooi.. Hoort die cyclebarrier wellicht op dat stuk naar de Hulsdonk?  Hij staan nu precies op de verbindingsnode van de Bolderik met het voetpad bij de parkeerplaats.
Zixon (2018-09-06 09:41:23+00:00): De cyclebarrier staat precies op de scheiding van de Bolderik en het pad naar de Hulsdonk. Dat lijkt me juist zo dan?
eggie (2018-09-06 09:59:05+00:00): Geen ramp hier, ....
Maar is dat ook de scheiding  naar het pad dat rond de parkeerplaats loopt. Er worden nogal eens op de kruisingen barriers geplaatst terwijl ze op de weg zelf horen te staan. Begrijp je wat ik bedoel? We zetten dus op kruisingen van wegen geen barrier neer. 
Dus komt iemand van de parkeerplaats van zuid naar noord die barrier ook tegen?
Zixon (2018-09-06 10:07:10+00:00): Ik snap wat je bedoelt. Van zuid naar noord kom je geen barrier tegen. Daar loop je net langs dan. Wat is aan te raden? De barrier net op het pad van de Hulsdonk zetten?
eggie (2018-09-06 10:34:48+00:00): Yep
joost schouppe (2018-11-17 13:37:33+00:00): Ziet er goed uit. Ondertussen heeft er iemand nog expliciet toegevoegd dat dit ondergronds is :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62326970
eggie (2018-09-06 06:41:38+00:00): Meestal gebruiken we highway= path (zonder bebording) of highway=footway met aanduiding wandelpad. pedestrian is meer voor voetgangersgebieden. bv in bij winkelcentra. Dit stukje mag je niet fietsen?
Zixon (2018-09-06 09:19:34+00:00): Hier mag je inderdaad gewoon fietsen. Heb het aangepast. Bedankt!
eggie (2018-09-06 09:29:30+00:00): Oke!
andrewwiseman (2018-10-18 23:24:05+00:00): Thanks for mapping, however the names you're adding look like temporary things, or a reminder to yourself for when you are staying somewhere. OpenStreetMap is for permanent things, I would suggest if you wanted to add dates you export the data or use another map service with OSM as a base that you can annotate yourself. UMap is a great tool for example https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UMap
eggie (2018-09-06 06:51:50+00:00): Helemaal prima, maar svp niet zelf adressen aanmaken in OSM. Al die adressen zijn al aanwezig door een import vanuit het Kadaster. Probeer daarom op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. 
Graag dus het adres verwijderen en de info combineren met adresnode 4a (ligt iets erboven) 
MVG,
Eggie
Jonah Adkins (2018-09-06 11:04:32+00:00): hello - i'm local to the area -  the boundaries actually do extend out to the water - the state collected, researched and created a layer of boundaries is here https://vgin.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=a3a5b9e4193b48368e18355247a54e4d. If there's a law to the contrary, i'd be interested in taking a look at that with you.
-jonah
andrewwiseman (2018-10-15 19:19:04+00:00): Gracias para mapear! Aunque, cuando mapeando edificios, debe añadir "building" en vez de "landuse=residential". Por favor dígame si tiene ud. preguntas. Gracias!
Rich1234 (2018-09-06 02:24:45+00:00): Hi.  Thanks for helping to improve open street map.

Based upon both satellite images and bing streetside images (both of which your changeset states you used) this new service road should have additionally have been tagged with the "service=driveway" tag because it fits the definition of the "service=driveway" subtype.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway for details.
talukdm (2018-09-07 05:22:07+00:00): Hi, Thanks for bringing it up. I have made the edits as per the suggestion.
user_3012156 (2018-09-06 01:44:55+00:00): Zur weiteren Klärung: Der gesamte Bucheggplatz inkl. der Überführung (Spinne) ist absolutes Fahrverbot. Ausser für Anwohner, VBZ, Taxis und Lieferanten. Wenn ich Wege markiere und erfasst das Fahrräder keinen Zugang haben, hat nicht ein d_berger zu kommen und diese Situation zu löschen. Ich weiss selbst das es einen Velounterstand und eine Publibikestation auf dem Platz hat. Diesbezüglich gibt es einen Kontakt mit dem zuständigen Kreischef der Stadtpolizei Zürich. Sollte sich an dieser Situation etwas ändern, werde ich dies erfassen. Es ist unfassbar, das man Räume ersatzlos löscht, weil die einem offensichtlich nicht passen. Die Neue WC Anlage wurde durch mich erfasst und masstabsgetreu eingetragen. d_berger hat hier die Finger davon zu lassen, wenn man schon keine Ahnung hat! Wie ich es einem Moderator schon mal geschildert habe, wenn es der OSM-Community nicht passen sollte, könnt ihr die Arbeit gerne selbst erledigen. Ich habe kein Problem damit. Es hat etwas mit Anstand zu tun, dass man erst gerade erfasstes, nicht einfach so löscht, abändert, etc. ohne nachzufragen. Der User d_berger ist unglaublich!
d_berger (2018-09-06 06:52:44+00:00): Dein langer Roman macht es auch nicht korrrekter. In der Blaupause (http://ibb.co/den309) sind neu zwei WC-Kabinen und Zusatzraum für die technischen Anlagen eingetragen - und nicht drei WC-Kabinen. Und wie das mappen von Räumen funktioniert, liest du im wiki nach, jedenfalls ganz sicher nicht mit building=yes. Wird später geändert, schönen Tag noch.
user_3012156 (2018-09-06 07:08:33+00:00): Mich interessieren Deine Ausführungen nicht. Ich habe das ganze erfasst und Du hast mich kontrolliert und das ganze nach deinem Gusto geändert. Ein solches Verhalten toleriere ich nicht. Wenn Du das Gefühl hast alles erneut zu ändern, werde ich es wieder zurück ändern und zwar so lange, bist Du endlich Ruhe gibst. Sollte das nicht der Fall sein, werde ich alle deine Änderungen prüfen und gegebenenfalls berichtigen. Wenn Du Kindergarten haben willst, kannst Du den haben.
Chris Fleming (2018-09-06 10:05:01+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap; I have a small question about the 2 hotels you've added in Scotland, neither are in locations I would expect to see hotels and I was just wondering if you have any details such as the names for them?
5m4u9 (2018-09-07 17:08:00+00:00): gracias por registrar, solo un comentario. En resturantes de comida boliviana, poner "bolivian" en cuisine y en piscinas poner acceso "customers"... para que no aparezca como piscina pública municipal :)
US Woods (2018-09-11 15:25:43+00:00): Just curious: Why do ridges need relations?
abbafei (2018-09-13 00:54:30+00:00): The reasons I make relations for ridges are as follows :-)

- For longer ridges which are discontinuous (separated by valley(s), for example) and marked by multiple ways, but share one name, and are considered part of the same ridge (and, when there is one, share a Wikipedia page), this enables the information on that ridge to be centered in one place.
- Occasionally, it can help show that multiple distinct ridges in one region which have the same name, are indeed different ridges, not to be confused with their like-named neighbor.
- I think some people add relations to objects so that they can have a more stable ID number, which can be referenced elsewhere (although the OSM wiki recommends adding the reference in OSM itself instead).

Even in the case where one, or many, of these reasons do not apply, I create a relation where information on the ridge can be entered, since in the future the way may be split or its neighbor may get a new name, etc.
viloan (2018-09-06 03:08:48+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2019-07-21 10:16:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:16:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:16:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2019-07-21 10:16:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
dekatherm (2019-11-18 08:46:10+00:00): Hi escallic,

many buildings are very ugly and malformed: e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/623250157

When are you gonna fix them?

Kind regards