piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TehSmithster (2017-02-03 16:35:47+00:00): Good morning,

Thank you for reaching out to me about my prior work.  As a basis, I am the Program Manager at the Center for Interdisciplinary Geospatial Information Technologies at Delta State University in Cleveland, MS - the area I am working on.

1. I have not personally tagged anything with elevation data in my contributions, and I looked for those specified keys in the data I have been working on but I could not find "Ground_Elv."  I will continue looking and I will correct it as I wish to follow the accepted keys as outlined in the OSM standards.

2. The data for the building footprints was digitized from LAS files in ArcGIS here at the Center with the purpose of uploading to OSM.  I know they are not completely perfect for a few buildings, but I plan on correcting that.  Overall, importing the footprints layer drastically saved me time and effort in individually digitizing all the building footprints around Cleveland, MS.

I will continue to strive to maintain OSM standards, and I expected something would come up afoul after I uploaded that data even though I committed a lot of effort in reviewing the data prior to uploading it to the OSM server.

If you have any further issues, I will be glad to assist as I plan on working on the Cleveland, MS area extensively with the hopes of keeping it within the OSM standards.

Thank you and have a great day!

-Chris
Nakaner (2017-02-03 19:57:21+00:00): Hi Chris,

I have had a look at your import and I am pleasantly surprised. From time to time a building import in the US gets discussed at the German OpenStreetMap Forum. There is also a discussion about this import (in German). https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57218 I don't expect you to participate there (and I don't expect that you read it because it is in German). Imports which get discussed there are usually of low quality: too many nodes per building, wrong tagging, unclear license status, huge changesets, no community involvement etc.

I am happy that your did not just bulk-import a shapefile of the city government (the usual way building imports work). You are also editing other features like landuse. That's great.

Unfortunately, the tagging is not the only problem of this changeset. There are more.

1. Data you want to import must be corrected before you upload it to OpenStreetMap, not afterwards.

2. Buildings in OSM should be represent buildings which in exist in reality. This building and its surrounding buildings don't. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465051012#map=19/33.73868/-90.74696

3. Buildings should be rectangular if they are rectangular in reality. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471264469#map=19/33.74659/-90.73032

4. Buildings should share nodes if they are terraced. Bing imagery looks as if this building is terraced. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471264469#map=19/33.74659/-90.73032

5. If multiple people map together, every user should use his/her own OSM account. We are a community project and might have the need to ask questions regarding the data. (If you are a group with a leader, e.g. a university course or a group of employees, we would also like to know who is responsible for their work)

6. If available, additional sources (license must be compatible) should be use to verify. Bing is a great resource in Cleveland to check the geometry of buildings.

Unfortunately, the legal status of the LiDaR data is unknown. I neither know who the data owner is nor I know if you have the permission to upload the digitized features to OpenStreetMap. The legal status of a source is something which you will be asked in an import discussion.

It wasn't easy to decide wether I should revert this changeset or not because it is a bit better than all those other building import attempts all over the US. At the end, I decided to revert it because imports have a large impact due to their size and history teaches us that bad imports usually do not get repaired within a reasonable time.

You will receive notifications via email (and changeset comment) after the revert has been finished. Due to the size of this changeset, it might take about an hour or two.

Best regards

Michael


@everyone else: I also commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45784922 which contains a link to the Import Guidelines.
Nakaner-repair (2017-02-04 04:37:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 45796297, 45793826, 45795852, 45794620, 45795178 where the changeset comment is: Revert import of buildings traced from LAS files (chageset 45727520). See changeset discussion for more information.
chillly (2017-02-01 21:50:45+00:00): You have changed a road in Uganda to a footpath, named footpath, added a faintly ridiculous park and doodled a footpath. 

We want new people to add stuuf, but it has to be real stuff, in the right place correctly described.
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 04:30:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45838308 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
chillly (2017-02-01 21:45:48+00:00): Another walking route rather than a real footway
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-02-02 21:46:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264073666 - skoro jest błędny, to trzeba łaskawie ten błąd zgłosić u źródła.
mueschel (2017-02-03 13:21:15+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29110888
maxspeed 80 oder 90? Da ist ein tag zu viel.

Gruß, Jan
Linie29 (2017-02-03 17:14:23+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Habe auf den richtigen "maxspeed:backward"-Tag korrigiert.
chillly (2017-02-01 21:44:14+00:00): Another doodle rather than a real path
brettmalott (2017-02-13 20:33:12+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
chillly (2017-02-01 21:43:25+00:00): Another route rather than a real footway
chillly (2017-02-01 21:42:10+00:00): This looks like another route rather than a real footway.
dentonny (2021-07-16 14:49:29+00:00): survey:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=863930817530792
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=944979382741167
brettmalott (2017-02-13 20:33:47+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
maraf24 (2017-02-03 18:20:39+00:00): Mam parę pytań:
1. Skąd jest ref:prng, skoro w PRNG nie ma nic, co można by użyć jako ref?
2. Skąd są wzięte nazwy niemieckie, i dlaczego nie są w old_name:de?
3. W jakim systemie odniesień są dodane/zmodyfikowane wysokości?

Dodatkowo: linki do wikipedii powinny być w formacie wikipedia=pl:XXX, postać wikipedia:pl=XXX jest najczęściej zupełnie "niewidoczna" dla oprogramowania.
Rzezimierz (2017-02-03 21:03:55+00:00): 1. http://www.codgik.gov.pl/index.php/darmowe-dane/prng.html
Otwierasz plik Excela ze spisem obiektów fizhjograficznych -> pierwsza kolumna to identyfikator PRNG, to że Ty nie wiesz o identyfikatorze nie oznacza, że go tam nie ma.
2. Z niemieckich map Messtischblatt, nie są to "stare" nazwy niemieckie, są to obowiązujące niemieckie nazwy, przykład: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hohes_Rad_(Riesengebirge). Nie są używane, bo zastapiła je polska nazwa, to jest fakt - ale na pewno nie są "staroniemieckie". Z resztą, z chęcią podyskutuje o tym w szerszym gronie.
3. Mapy topograficzne dostępne w Geoportalu, opis układu odniesienia tutaj: http://www.geoportal.gov.pl/dane/skany-map-topograficznych

Odnośnie wikipedii możesz mieć niestety rację, nie sprawdziłem tego dostatecznie przed poprawkami i żyłem w niewiedzy, że postać wikipedia:kraj jest poprawna ;/
maraf24 (2017-02-03 21:53:10+00:00): Ad.2. Dyskusję o nazwach niemieckich w takich krajach jak Polska przeczytaj sobie tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34066712
Ad.3. A tutaj możesz się zapoznać, jak w OSM rozumiane jest ele: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele

Wszelkie dyskusje w szerszym gronie miałeś obowiązek przeprowadzić przed dokonaniem tych zmian.
Rzezimierz (2017-02-03 22:01:04+00:00): Ad.3. Cytat z wymienionej ode mnie strony: Mapy topograficzne wykonane są w układach współrzędnych  „1942", „1965", „1992", "GUGiK 80" (1:100 000) w systemie odniesień przestrzennych „WGS-84" (vmapL2).

Cytat ze strony wskazanej przez Ciebie: For OpenStreetMap, please use the elevation above mean sea level defined by the World Geodetic System, revision WGS 84 (height above WGS84/EGM96 geoid, also known as "corrected" WGS84 height). 

W obu przypadkach jest wzmianka o WGS84
maraf24 (2017-02-03 22:03:04+00:00): Ad.1.Masz rację, w plikach CODGiK jest ten identyfikator. Zmyliło mnie to, że w miejscowościach zaimportowanych do OSM z PRNG on się nie pojawia.
Rzezimierz (2017-02-03 22:11:18+00:00): Ad.2. Hmmm, OK, pomijam fakt dyskutowania o takich rzeczach w komentarzu do zmian a nie w bardziej przystępnym i dającym się łatwiej odnaleźć miejscu. Dalej wydaje mi się, że to kwestia preferencji i naszego stosunku do pewnych kwestii historycznych. Fajnie by było zadać sobie pytanie kto z takich danych skorzysta i jaki sposób prezentacji danych pozwoli mu je w łatwiejszy sposób wykorzystać. Przykład: widzę stara widokówkę, wyszukuje w OSM po nazwie i mając zindeksowaną niemiecką nazwę wiem co to jest za obiekt. Jednocześnie mam obawy czy mapy wyświetlające nazwy obcojęzyczne wspierają znaczniki "old_name", przykład: https://www.openstreetmap.de/karte.html
tux67 (2017-02-02 09:59:46+00:00): Hallo axelberger,
danke, daß du bei OSM mitmachst und hilfst die Daten zu verbessern. Die Kapelle die du eingezeichnet hast, sieht man auf  dem Luftbild nicht so richtig.  Heisst "Lt. Städtischer Plangrundlage" das das die Vorlage fürs mapping war, oder ist der Bau erst geplant? (die Gemeindewebseite sagt der Bau war in den 50'gern).
Gruß
Stephan (tux67)
axelberger (2017-02-02 20:43:49+00:00): Hallo Stephan,
den Namen habe ich aus den Plangrundlagen des "Der Gutachterausschuss für Grundstückswerte" BorisNRW entnommen. 
Die Kapelle existiert schon viele Jahre.
Viele Grüße
tux67 (2017-02-02 20:44:46+00:00): Ok, danke!
SomeoneElse (2017-02-02 18:00:29+00:00): Hello,
You've used https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/ as a source here - is that actually licence-compatible with OSM?  The text on https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page would suggest not.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-02-02 18:01:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez utilisé https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/ comme source ici - est-ce que c'est compatible avec OSM? Le texte sur https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page suggérerait pas.
Meilleures salutations,
Andy
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 04:30:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45838308 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-07 02:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45854666 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-02-02 14:49:08+00:00): I am confused why you have transferred max height from the node to way, when for some of the ways they are accessible for vehicles greater than this height from both sides of the obstruction and can deliver to businesses up to the obstruction but cannot pass through it.
cdavila (2017-02-02 15:08:28+00:00): Hello
I check restriction from node affects all a way before moving values, but maybe I missed something. Can you tell me what way are you talking about? (Changeset involves several ways).
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-02-02 15:24:13+00:00): ok starting near the top; Terry Avenue is also accessible from Clementhorpe, while the height restriction only affects vehicles coming from Skeldergate
cdavila (2017-02-02 15:44:00+00:00): I'm not sure I catch what you mean. I applied height restriction only to Terry avenue portion under Skeldergate Bridge, which I think is OK. If space under bridge is 8'6'' it affects all vehicles, no matter where they come from. Please correct me if I'm wrong or I'm missing something
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-02-02 15:53:53+00:00): Sorry, I have misread your changes, many apologies, (the part of Terry Ave between the two bridges has a max height of the higher of the two bridges)
cdavila (2017-02-02 16:44:36+00:00): No problem at all. It's good to have people supervising possible errors in changeset.
brettmalott (2017-02-13 20:34:30+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
dchiles (2017-02-02 18:09:46+00:00): Why were the two buildings along Park Avenue deleted? 
Related: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/878198
http://osmcha.mapbox.com/45728780/
DannyAiquipa (2017-02-02 18:49:19+00:00): Hi thanks for pointing this out, I'm not sure how this happened, however I will add those buildings again.  Regards.
DannyAiquipa (2017-02-02 18:54:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45756249
dchiles (2017-02-07 22:41:54+00:00): 👍🏻
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 04:30:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45838308 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
brettmalott (2017-02-13 20:35:05+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-05 19:10:41+00:00): Hi Dbaek, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
SomeoneElse (2017-04-25 15:36:54+00:00): Hi,
I'd suggest actually checking these in a bit more detail before you mechanically edit them - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4300814810/history is clearly just garbage (and was the subject of a previous revert).
Cheers,
Andy
Aleks-Berlin (2017-04-25 18:10:26+00:00): Hi Andy, actually the decision how far a fix should be is not htat easy. One the one hand we should "respect the work of others" (and not delete a likely bad name-tag). But I would also like to reach a state in OSM, that makes it more easy useable (less exceptions, country specific rules, typical frequent typos, not reading the OSM wiki mistakes [amenity=hotel] [wikipedia=http..], invisible characters (0x7F) inside values, empty keys or values, front/rear spaces, etc).
A question/suggestion to you: why there is no automatic script, that is informing the user and (if no reaction) an admin that a known typical mistake has been entered ?
I know ato-fixing is a problem, but auto-warning should be fine.
Many regards, Alexander
brettmalott (2017-02-13 20:35:39+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
nevw (2017-02-02 01:01:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
I shifted these 2 sites off the roadway and footpaths onto the nearest building as seen on the satellite imagery. Probably helps to zoom in closer in your app to locate points of interest to map if able.
Keep up the mapping,
Bye
Warin61 (2021-06-29 07:04:46+00:00): I would think the reserve includes the lake, that would protect the lake.
qsa (2017-02-01 23:11:00+00:00): Fogalmam sincs ki törölte le a városmajori kistemplomot, de nagyon haragszok érte. Ez akkor is felszentelt templom, ha többnyire hittanórákat tartanak benne.
brettmalott (2017-02-13 20:36:08+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
Cascafico (2017-02-02 08:55:04+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto in OSM. Ho affinato il tag leisure=park in leisure=playgound
GinaroZ (2017-02-01 23:57:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding this. Don't know if it was you who opened it, but can we now close this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/860220
turner150990 (2017-02-18 09:00:17+00:00): The street is added ok. I think it was a neiughbour who added it. I've commented on that post about the parking facilities and houses and car parking spaces yet to be added to the map. I only mention it as the houses aren't on the side of the road that was added. There's 2 layers of spaces in between the road and the houses.
brettmalott (2017-02-13 20:36:45+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
maraf24 (2017-02-02 10:37:15+00:00): Dróg planowany nie oznaczamy jako w budowie.
Poprawione.
brettmalott (2017-02-13 20:37:22+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:09:38+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
Commodoortje (2017-02-02 04:10:25+00:00): Hallo en welkom op OpenStreetMap!
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken. Het is de bedoeling dat de werkelijkheid in kaart wordt gebracht. Ook een Pokemon speler kan waardevolle data inbrengen, mits deze voldoen aan de werkelijkheid. Uw edit zal gecontroleerd worden op vandalisme en zal om deze reden teruggedraaid kunnen worden.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-02-02 04:11:11+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik je mutaties op sommige punten aangepast.
Ongetwijfeld was je bedoeling goed, maar wat je hebt gedaan, is dat de detaillering hebt verwijderd. Een park is een overkoepeling. 
het grondgebruik (landuse) is grass/forest en (natural) water en het rekreatiedoel (leisure) is een park.
Overigens, niet ieder stukje gras is een park.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust.
ForstEK (2019-05-20 07:28:55+00:00): Hi, FOOD_KR! You should retag this object from "man_made=송풍구_조형물" to "artwork_type=sculpture" according standard wiki scheme, see here for example: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:artwork_type
highflyer74 (2017-02-03 19:40:37+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

Please keep in mind that OSM is a serious geographic database. Never add objects that do not exist in real life. Pokemon is a game, OSM is not. If you keep that in mind, you are welcome to continue mapping!

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask!

All the best,

highflyer74
Glassman (2017-02-03 05:17:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM. For privacy reasons, we don't show who owns or who lives in a house. Please remove the owners names.
samely (2017-02-02 20:31:57+00:00): Hi Andrew, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around this zone and found you traced this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20724089/history  which has impossible angles and doesn't seem to be based in satellite imagery. Can you check it please?
Regards,
Eliane
Andrew Matheny (2017-02-02 20:37:42+00:00): Fixed! Looks like this was just one particularly nasty TIGER street that needed to be cleaned up the rest of the way
saikabhi_LA_imports (2017-02-02 10:40:09+00:00): Source is: LA County GIS, http://egis3.lacounty.gov/dataportal/
Warin61 (2017-02-03 22:08:21+00:00): Hi,
When you added the library .. there was a node already tagged as the library ... this causes 2 to be present on the map when only one should be present.  The polite way is to use the old node as one corner of the new building .. and then copy the tags across to the way (the building) and edit them to suit. I have done the crude method and simply remove the old node.

You can check for these duplicates by looking on the OSM map (using  it as a layer/map in your editor).
Hope that helps.
Bella7930 (2017-02-04 01:18:30+00:00): Hi, thank you for the feedback, I will be more careful in the future.
tonyf1 (2018-03-10 23:12:38+00:00): Deleted by joserrg12
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-06 06:35:47+00:00): Hi  석이S2,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added a park here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471343570/history#map=18/34.93991/127.49358. Does park really exists there? Can you check and get back on this edit.

Regards,

Upendra.
Unhallowed (2017-02-02 07:11:25+00:00): Good job finding this unmarked park, but I actually think these are two separate parks. From the zoning map it looks like Kingsbriar Park only goes from Brookmont Dr to Fairmont Blvd. Then Rio del Oro Park starts at Avenida Puesta Del Sol and ends at Avenida Del Este.
nammala (2017-02-03 06:19:23+00:00): Hi  포고고고,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems intentionally okay you have been deleting some bad stuff on the map. But the footways you have added doesn't have good alignment or precision. I am deleting the edits . Make sure you add data with proper alignment. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
Spanholz (2017-02-02 09:16:44+00:00): I changed this to leisure=nature_reserve. This area is no skatepark.
nevw (2017-02-02 07:39:04+00:00): Hi Chace Hua
Welcome to the Openstreetmap.
I can see by your editing that you are unaware that you are editing a public map.
Do you wish to fix the edits yourself or do you wish me to revert your changesets?
nevw (2017-02-03 12:15:54+00:00): fixed these edits.
Glassman (2017-02-03 05:17:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM. For privacy reasons, we don't show who owns or who lives in a house. Please remove the owners names.
aharvey (2017-02-10 01:11:03+00:00): Hi was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117338675/history demolished?

Or is the building still there?
TheSwavu (2017-02-10 01:50:51+00:00): Apparently it's gone bye-bye:

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/sydney-imax-cinema-at-darling-harbour-to-be-demolished-20160824-gqzs83.html
Spanholz (2017-02-02 08:29:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

I changed this area according to OSM tagging standard. If you are not sure how map something, please have a look in the wiki.
Sunfishtommy (2017-02-07 18:03:18+00:00): This data is incorrect and low quality please put more effort into these contributions.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-02-02 05:28:49+00:00): Hi Imstilllearningtheedittool, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You are doing great work. please continue to contribute free map. In this case you have added service roads but not connected to main roads. Please connect to the roads so that it's routable. To learn basic editing on OpenStreetMap follow this link: http://learnosm.org/en/
dudka (2017-02-06 08:19:01+00:00): щось тут не так з wikipedia тегами
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/256614657/history