piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Colin Smale (2021-09-25 19:43:02+00:00): Hi,
What's the background to this edit? Normal British English usage is to omit the full stop, as the final letter of the abbreviation is also the final letter of the full word, i.e. it is a contraction.
Matt Dendle (2021-09-26 16:00:10+00:00): Hi Colin - thank you for your comments - I did not realise these were contractions.

As for the background - I had noticed, whilst doing some work on relations in Wales, that there is inconsistent use of the full stop in relations with a name containing "St".  I thought it would be of value to bring them to some kind of consistency; Here are existing relations in Wales which use the "St." contraction:
St. Harmon (11547860)
St. David's and the Cathedral Close (11175905)
St. Clears (9297751)
St. Thomas (1390183)
St. Nicholas and Bonvilston (11034934) 

Looks like I chose the wrong one to conform to! I've read that American English favours "St." whilst, as you say, British English favours "St".

Is there value in me making a changeset going the other way? I.e. changing the above relations to "St"?

Thanks for your help!
Matt
Colin Smale (2021-09-26 16:54:10+00:00): Hi Matt,
Welcome to OSM! You just put your foot in one of OSM's termite nests. I fully agree that consistency is worth a lot. However if you put it to the vote (another termite nest) I think there would be as many people supporting "St" as supporting "St.". When it comes down to it, there's no wrong or right, just personal preference. Mine happens to be without the dot, in line with documented BE practice and also slightly more concise, but far be it from me to suggest you reverse these changes.... It's accepted policy to avoid abbreviations in street and place names (i.e. write West instead of W, and Road instead of Road) but "St" is an accepted exception because these days the unabbreviated form is basically never used. If I changed "St Albans" into "Saint Albans" it would take just a few minutes before it was changed back.
DressyPear4 (2021-09-25 21:12:45+00:00): Por que as tags que fazem renderizar no mapa foram excluídas?
O prédio foi demolido?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111687415
jeslop (2021-09-28 14:36:15+00:00): Hello dengin. Thank you for your cooperation with OSM. This is a collaborative project based on communication between users to achieve a better map for everyone. The user community is the core of the project and therefore you should be in contact with them to improve the map together. It is necessary to answer questions from other users and to be in contact with them to solve any doubts or mistakes that may be made. I would appreciate it if you could respond to their questions and also improve the descriptions of your changesets.

Regards.

(Automatic translation)
Olá dengin. Obrigado por colaborar com a OSM. Este é um projeto de colaboração baseado na comunicação entre os usuários para conseguir um mapa melhor. A comunidade de usuários é o núcleo do projeto e, portanto, você deve estar em contato com eles para melhorar o mapa juntos. É necessário responder às perguntas dos outros usuários e estar em contato com eles para resolver quaisquer dúvidas ou erros que possam ser cometidos. Gostaria que você pudesse responder às questões levantadas e também melhorar as descrições de seus conjuntos de mudanças.

Cumprimentos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Sandal man (2023-07-06 19:04:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758428643
Boardwalk is gone, I will remove it from the OSM
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
Ser9ei (2021-09-26 09:20:13+00:00): Не надо менять uncontrolled на marked. Сначала читаем https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111688163
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-18 23:39:18+00:00): FYI, this should all be one parking area.  You can add individual parking spaces on top, but it shouldn't be divided up like it is here.  I have resolved it here, but other areas in this region need attention.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:18:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
hvalentim (2021-09-25 15:22:27+00:00): Thanks for fixing the typo.
Glitch-Hunter (2022-01-26 10:35:44+00:00): Ist das hier wirklich ein Park?
kubahahaha (2021-09-30 23:48:03+00:00): To nie było oznaczone jako hotel, tylko właśnie apartament do wynajęcia.
Takie rzeczy powinny znajdować się na mapie - ułatwiają szukanie turystom
MNXANL (2021-09-26 06:27:02+00:00): Please do not remove polygons that contain information like you did in this dataset
Glitch-Hunter (2021-10-17 18:09:44+00:00): haben die da ein See ausgebaggert?
Welche quelle hast du genutzt ?
DD1GJ (2022-01-26 09:01:59+00:00): Hallo Feigenbaum345,

könntest Du Dich bitte zeitnah zu dem See und einigen obskuren Parks äußern? Ansonsten besteht die Gefahr, dass alle Deine Änderungen zurückgesetzt werden.

 https://pokemon-go-forum.de/threads/pokemon-go-spieler-zerstoeren-open-streetmaps.3160/
Glitch-Hunter (2022-01-26 10:22:02+00:00): Pokemon Edit korregiert, Parks und Wasserfläche entfernt
Glitch-Hunter (2022-01-26 10:31:28+00:00): 9x noexit Sackgasse entfernt (wo keine sind) Vandalismus
martien-176 (2021-09-25 15:32:58+00:00): Hi Camila, i reviewed a few of your changesets for wich you requested a review.

Most of the buildings in this project have square 90 degrees corners. I noticed you regularly map buildings with non square corners. With iD Editor, after having drawn the outline and tagged the shape as a building, use the 'Q' key of your keyboard or right click and then select "square" to "square" the corners of the building.

Also i see you save your work regularly after mapping only one building. This is quite time consuming, just save after mapping 5 to 10 buildings. Only when you map buildings on the edge of a task you should save more often, to avoid possible conflicts with mappers in these neighbouring tasks.

Thanks and please keep mapping. 

Best regards from Martien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111689537
SomeoneElse (2021-09-26 10:50:18+00:00): Hello,
I notice that there's no comment on this changeset.  I wonder if that's because Vespucci's confused about languages?  The changeset says that Vespucci's "locale" is "en-XC" rather than "it" or similar - maybe the prompts for "changeset comment" and "changeset source" are missing?
Vespucci uses your phone's language and locale - I wonder if that could be changed?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-09-26 10:51:51+00:00): Ciao,
Ho notato che non ci sono commenti su questo changeset. Chissà se è perché Vespucci è confuso sulle lingue? Il changeset dice che la "locale" di Vespucci è "en-XC" piuttosto che "it" o simili - forse mancano i prompt per "commento del changeset" e "sourceset del changeset"?
Vespucci usa la lingua e "locale" del tuo telefono - mi chiedo se questo potrebbe essere cambiato?
Distinti saluti,
Andy
user_10901495 (2021-09-26 12:00:21+00:00): Niente di tutto questo, mi sono semplicemente dimenticato di inserire la descrizione al changeset. Vespucci lascia la possibilità di non inserirne una.
Saluti,
Martino
SomeoneElse (2021-09-26 12:15:38+00:00): OK - thanks.
mappinglander (2021-10-16 06:04:48+00:00): Hello, could I ask about why did you create this relation? the military installations and the border is already mapped.
Seandebasti (2021-10-16 06:59:06+00:00): Hi, thats right, some of the installations are mapped, but not all. A relation does not hurt mapped data. It just connects their meaning. and I do not really want to change the "mapped" border, for that I do not have proof, but for physical installations, like towers, walls and roads it could be a relation of interest. What is your opinion?
mappinglander (2021-10-16 07:28:55+00:00): I think that the name of relation could be clarified, maybe via adding a note tag saying "this relation is intended for grouping the military installations along turkish-syrian border" or something like that. Also, "type=boundary" is not for physical installations, and will likely cause rendering errors, hence I also suggest using another type=* tag, e.g. type=collection
mappinglander (2021-10-16 07:31:44+00:00): Also, don't always use Bing as source, because it's usually very old. Maxar is usually newer.
Seandebasti (2021-10-16 07:42:46+00:00): I try to fix that better. I usually use maxar, only for verification I use bing
SvM (2021-11-28 18:32:50+00:00): Пруд около Парфеновщины действительно спущен и дно заросло лесом? На большинстве снимков, кроме Esri и Bing (на которых обычно старые данные) отчётливо виден пруд.
xrew (2021-11-28 20:01:03+00:00): Здравствуйте, в 2020 году был там, пруд был на месте. В 2021 не проверял. Скорее всего никуда не делся.
SvM (2021-11-29 08:48:59+00:00): Может тогда вернёте теги пруда на этот полигон https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163798266#map=15/58.1284/50.0036
xrew (2021-11-29 16:59:31+00:00): Отредактировал (в прошлый раз видимо случайно лес выбрал вместо водоёма)
eggie (2021-09-25 19:28:47+00:00): Beste Voxy.. Beter geen combinaties maken met access=no
access=no is bijna altijd 'fout'. 
Dat zou betekenen dat er een bord Verboden Toegang zou staan.
Wanneer er geen (twee)wielers mogen komen kun je volstaan met vehicle=no

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-25 19:30:56+00:00): access=no heb ik verwijderd.
vehicle=no toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-25 19:37:29+00:00): Een eerste edit buiten Nederland voor Missing Maps  dus  nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Kovoschiz (2021-09-26 10:00:55+00:00): These two are the more well-known holding companies of this one front company, like a joint venture. Both are publicized and presented.
hulocal (2021-09-25 14:40:35+00:00): https://iwebgis.net/hanau/buergergis/?lon=8.924558111416184&lat=50.138626635657005&zoom=15&select=false
martien-176 (2021-09-25 18:14:05+00:00): Hi, you asked for a review.

I see you deleted a building. It was only visible as a white blot. It often helps to switch to another imagery to get a clearer view of the area. Eg here with maxar the outline of the building can be clearly seen and mapped. But be sure to adjust the offset with the default imagery Mapbox before doing that.

I also see you retraced a road. The project instructions state to only map buildings. So roads should be left alone, unless they are crossing buildings.

Thanks for mapping and regards from Martien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111690408
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-07 11:30:33+00:00): prima di dare il nome aspetta che mettiamo apposto le relazioni.
martien-176 (2021-09-25 17:46:09+00:00): Test message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111691046
danieldegroot2 (2021-09-26 16:06:21+00:00): Hey stephengmatthews,

I've added a building tag, since this is also a building.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111729302

Regards,

Daniel
Neuwieder (2023-03-26 15:21:45+00:00): Hi 1nternetfreund,
Du hast das Gelände der Gärtnerei Ebel als ein komplettes Gebäude eingetragen. In der Karte sieht das schon seltsam aus, auf dem Luftbild sin dauch einzelne Gewächshäuser und einige Freiflächen erkennbar. Schaust du bitte nochmal drüber,  du hast vermutlich die beste Ortskenntnis. Danke!
k1wi (2021-09-28 18:25:44+00:00): Hola, has movido un nodo del "Paseo de Garcia el de Najera" casi un kilometro hacia el oeste deformandolo completamente. Por favor ten mas cuidado al editar. Lo he corregido en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111832350
ivanbranco (2021-09-26 22:09:06+00:00): Hi fkMohr,

see also=https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13239356

is not a valid tag. Maybe you could use something like this next time?:

note=See also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13239356
fkMohr (2021-09-27 10:09:02+00:00): Thank you; I changed it.
literan (2021-09-26 21:37:29+00:00): но зачем тег жилой зоны сносить при этом?
zulcom (2021-09-27 19:57:13+00:00): Виноват, не обратил внимания
zulcom (2021-09-27 20:00:02+00:00): Вижу что вы в своём пакете правок #111741545 вернули границу Headliner сюда. Зачем?
literan (2021-10-01 07:09:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11077942#map=16/55.7525/37.5258&layers=N вообщето не возвращал
zulcom (2021-10-01 09:56:29+00:00): Почему тогда над Мукомольный проезд 2 сейчас на онлайн карте есть надпись жк Headliner: https://ibb.co/y590jgp? Я что-то не так сделал? Извиняюсь за тупые вопросы, я новичок и пока разбираюсь :(
literan (2021-10-07 20:22:56+00:00): странно, какой-то косяк рендера. Пнул его разок, должно исправиться

сорри, что долго не отвечал - был в отпуске
iandees (2021-09-25 16:14:54+00:00): Hi! It looks like you added landuse=grass to a bunch of stuff that shouldn't have those tags. Can you take a look at this again?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111693024
hvalentim (2021-09-25 18:11:36+00:00): Ao alinhares a Oeste pela fonte que usaste distorceste o tamanho da igreja (não é tão longa). Tb não havia necessidade de apagar os degraus.
Reino Baptista (2021-09-26 07:50:25+00:00): Obrigado pela chamada de atenção.
Já reverti a igreja e os degraus à versão anterior e completei a parte da heritage. Realmente na cartografia Bing a igreja, se bem de desalinhada, aparece muito mais pequena em comprimento. O muro do adro(?) permanece untagged...
syntex (2021-09-25 17:26:38+00:00): Nie rysuj na ESRI : /
German C (2021-10-07 23:49:12+00:00): Hola, en esta zona no existen tiendas ópticas verifica si es un tourism=viewpoint (mirador, punto de observación)
German C (2021-10-07 23:48:58+00:00): Hola, en esta zona no existen tiendas ópticas verifica si es un tourism=viewpoint (mirador, punto de observación)
danieldegroot2 (2021-11-02 20:25:50+00:00): Hey Victor,

I have fixed some tags (typos) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113300989

Also, you used a combination of roof_tiles (originally contributed as "tile") and slate; these are two different things, so just fyi if you are unsure, check the wiki.

Regards,

Daniel
VictorIE (2021-11-02 21:39:55+00:00): It seems that houses on the one street were built by different builders. One chose tile, the other slate. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

The iD editor prompts both "tile" and "roof_tiles" - that's how that glitch crept in. :)
VictorIE (2021-11-02 21:40:18+00:00): Oh, thank you.
danieldegroot2 (2021-11-03 10:55:06+00:00): iD may occasionally suggest incorrect or odd values (i.e. those with capital letters or spaces). This is because it takes the most popular tags from taginfo, as you may know. It also has some warnings which may suggest adding outdated/synonymous tags or similar, this you should already know. (e.g. basin tagging)
DP24PH (2021-10-31 09:43:47+00:00): It seems that the busway render does not appear on the standard carto. We might have to wait for further updates on the standard carto (Leaflet) render.
ovruni (2021-09-25 21:11:20+00:00): Vandalismo revertido.  En https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111696490 el usuario indica que son para juegos de aplicación.
dpolovinkin (2024-10-17 06:21:58+00:00): а что такое эр5, эр11 что вы тут надобавляли в лесах?)
dpolovinkin (2024-10-21 06:40:47+00:00): добрый день еще раз, если вы не ответите за следующие 3 дня что добавили в этом ченджсете, тк у вас он первый в аккаунте и не понятно что такое рр3, Kal9, эр4, теш4 и подобное что вы надобавляли без тэга а просто названием точки - я откачу весь changeset... так что буду ждать ответа!
dpolovinkin (2025-03-28 03:40:10+00:00): ответа не последовало, так что как и обещал - откатил в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164190087
ovruni (2021-09-25 21:11:50+00:00): Vandalismo revertido.  El usuario indica que son para juegos de aplicación.
ovruni (2021-09-25 21:12:20+00:00): Vandalismo revertido.  Al usuario se le ha escrito previamente. Ver http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10592921
ovruni (2021-09-25 21:13:15+00:00): Se ha restaurado varias vías eliminadas en este conjunto de cambios.
ovruni (2021-09-25 21:13:26+00:00): Se ha restaurado varias vías eliminadas en este conjunto de cambios.
Drunk Wizard (2021-09-25 17:57:50+00:00): source: прогулка + егрн
PT-53 (2021-09-26 08:12:38+00:00): Hallo Karthoo,
Du hast an diesen beiden Wegabschnitten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457644852/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40097754/history
jeweils die Merkmale
- bicycle=designated
- foot=designated
ergänzt.
Steht dort zwischenzeiotlich ein Verkehrszeichen # 240 bzw. # 241 ?
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240

Fragende Grüße
Karthoo (2021-09-26 08:28:23+00:00): Hallo,

Bin mir nicht sicher, ich habe leider kein Bild vom Schild gemacht. Jedenfalls verlaufen dort mittlerweile sämtliche Radwege, die früher südlich der L257 beschildert waren. bicycle= sollte daher zumindest mal mit yes angefügt werden.

Grüße
Karthoo/Leon
PT-53 (2021-09-26 08:36:20+00:00): Hallo Karthoo,
bei einem highway=path 
gelten foot=yes und bicycle=yes als impliziert. 
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
Nur von den Standartwerten abweichende Benutzungsregelungen sollten expliziet eingetragen werden.
Grüße
38446 (2022-05-06 16:57:20+00:00): Gute Idee, die Reste der römischen Mauer. Habe mal im Mauritiussteinweg die Tags angepasst, denn (a) ein Turm ist kein city gate und (b) er ist ja auch gar nicht mehr vorhanden. Außerdem hat die Mauer keine Inschrift (inscription). Siehe neues CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120639257
38446 (2022-05-06 17:00:18+00:00): Korrigiere, Änderungs-Changeset ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120639492
MxxCon (2021-09-26 00:54:55+00:00): It's on the road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111697498
daniel_solow (2021-09-28 21:37:00+00:00): Yeah, they close down this segment of Queens Boulevard for a few hours on Sundays. It also extends onto 70 Avenue but I believe that part is on the sidewalk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111697498
German C (2021-10-07 23:48:40+00:00): Hola, en esta zona no existen tiendas ópticas verifica si es un tourism=viewpoint (mirador, punto de observación)
Владимир К (2021-10-15 12:35:55+00:00): is there any signs orcucleways?
literan (2021-10-20 11:06:36+00:00): bicycles are allowed everywhere; this tag is redundant

2Владимир К - нет там никаких знаков (в июле 2021 не было), но это и не тротуар чтобы всех на дорогу отправлять
ZeLonewolf (2021-09-30 04:02:32+00:00): Hi, this edit broke the Forrest Park boundary, are you able to fix it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/133493#map=17/39.01482/-77.03169
heretofore (2021-09-30 13:01:28+00:00): Thanks. Is this right? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111916814 I assume you meant "Forest Glen," not "Forrest Park."
ElliottPlack (2021-10-01 17:11:01+00:00): I can take a look, these census boundaries are often wonky.
DaShock (2021-09-25 23:45:13+00:00): Na pewno powinno się uznawać te drogi za drugorzędne?
czebureks (2021-09-26 12:33:50+00:00): Przeprowadziłem kilka modyfikacji w Trójmieście i tę uważam za najmniej kontrowersyjną - mamy tu wszak do czynienia z najkrótszą trasą łączącą Obwodnicę Trójmiasta z centrum Gdyni, z pewnością o znaczeniu wykraczającym poza komunikację Witomina z sąsiednimi dzielnicami. Z tego też powodu obecnie przygotowywana jest obwodnica Witomina, po której ukończeniu ciąg stanie się nie tylko najkrótszą, ale też najszybszą trasą.
pio2_122 (2021-09-25 20:46:45+00:00): Dlaczego mapując przepust dodajesz dodatkowo obrys mostu (man_made=bridge) z layer=1?
np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986987909/history

Z tego oznaczenia wynika, że nad torami jest most (layer=1) a pod torami przepust (layer=-1).

Dodawanie obrysu most jest więc niepoprawne. Wystarczy wystarczy oznaczenie przepustu na cieku wodnym (layer=-1
tunnel=culvert
waterway=* [np. drain]).

Te zmiany poprawię już sam.
SafetyIng (2021-09-30 12:06:37+00:00): Hey,
Warum löscht du diese Knoten, wenn dort der Supermarkt wieder aufgebaut werden soll? 
In diesem Fall würde man zum Beispiel das "shop=supermarket" durch "destroyed:shop=supermarket" ersetzen.....
eggie (2021-09-25 19:52:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
limes11 (2022-07-07 08:23:55+00:00): Hallo Engel, 

da du auf dem Weg die Tags gesetzt hast, kannst Du bitte mal hierauf schauen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3255283#map=19/54.17884/10.54226&layers=N

Danke,

Limes
NGL-engel (2022-07-08 15:41:07+00:00): Hallo Limes, 
    ich habe den Weg so, wie ich ihn im letzten Jahr vorgefunden und abgelaufen bin, eingetragen. Ich bin allerdings von Süden her gekommen und bin den Weg nicht komplett bis in die Ortschaft Neversfelde gegangen. Falls sich dort, am nördlichen Weganfang, irgendeine Beschilderung befindet, haben ich sie nicht gesehen. 

Sollten die Tags nicht richtig sein, am Besten kurze Info was man (ich) dort anders hätte machen sollen.
Gruß Engel
eggie (2021-09-25 19:57:47+00:00): Dag Rik..
Medemappers willen graag weten wat iemand heeft toegevoegd. Graag dus concreet commentaar bij je upload..
-teken  is niet duidelijk.
Paden in het buitengebied zijn vaak highway=path  Een footway heeft een G7 bord.
Ik heb wat aangepast. Omgetagd naar path en pad losgemaakt van het bos. 
MVG
eggie
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-09-26 09:26:25+00:00): Moin chalkviech,
bitte verwende aussagekräftige Kommentare, damit andere Deine Änderungen besser nachvollziehen können. Vielen Dank!
Gruß Roger Wilco
zorglubu (2021-09-26 07:53:07+00:00): Bonjour Pierre,

D'abord merci de contribuer à OSM.

Je suis surpris par l'explication "car Waze renvoie etc.", en effet Waze est contrôlé par Google et n'utilise pas les données OpenStreetMap.
Ensuite, si le nom visible quand on arrive sur le parking est "P ECO", ce qui me semble être le cas, il faut le laisser ainsi. Lorsqu'on cherche "P ECO Orly" dans une application utilisant OSM, comme Organic Maps par exemple, on le trouve. Il ne faut mettre dans le nom que ce qu'on voit sur le terrain : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Ne_cartographiez_pas_pour_le_rendu
Est-ce qu'on peut lire "parking officiel" sur le panneau à l'entrée ? Merci.

Bien cordialement.
azakh-world (2021-09-27 15:29:00+00:00): Добрый день.
Пришлось частично откатить этот пакет правок из-за ошибок. Был сильно повреждён дом 49 по ул. Теннистая. Он был составлен из частей с помощью мультиполигонов, после правки все мультиполигоны поломались. Составные здания - это сложная тема и их неудобно править в редакторе iD.
Заодно отмечу, что в предыдущих ваших ченджсетах со зданий пропадает тег building, чего не должно быть. Похоже, это автоматически делает редактор iD, когда на здание ставится тег amenity. Пожалуйста, проверяйте, что получается при таких исправлениях.

С уважением,
Алексей
literan (2021-09-26 21:30:56+00:00): в следующий раз будет блок
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-27 18:39:42+00:00): Just wondering what your source on the postcode for this is, data I have suggests that GU51 3LN is the other side of the road and this side is 3LW