piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-12-09 09:13:08+00:00): Ronda trzeba odpowiednio tagować, by aplikacje wiedziały, że to rondo: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=458640304
rsoltys (2016-12-09 10:38:48+00:00): Racja , racja ... zagapiłem się.
Dzięki za korektę :)
Pozdrawiam
user_5359 (2016-12-10 18:08:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:00:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
user_5359 (2016-12-10 18:07:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-12-13 08:40:15+00:00): Jaka nazwa ulicy? http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy/#18/50.08008/20.00479
mavl (2019-01-13 17:17:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2019-01-13 17:17:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
chihchun (2016-12-21 13:36:34+00:00): Hi, please just use meter in ele[1], you don't need to put a m in the value. Thanks

[1] Key:ele - OpenStreetMap Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele
korte walter (2018-01-01 11:23:36+00:00): Sorry, for the late reply, I only see this comment now. What exactly do you mean, should I just give the value as a number without a trailing m?
chihchun (2018-01-03 06:10:48+00:00): Correct, just the value in metres above sea level (m ASL / m a.s.l.)
*Martin* (2016-12-09 17:15:57+00:00): Ahoj. Popis "zmeny" nie je velmi vystizny.
Nakaner (2016-12-18 13:52:42+00:00): Hi FrankFfm,

warum hast Du bei folgendem Way und einigen anderen Ways name=Main-Weser-Bahn entfernt?

Warum hast Du den Namen des Bahnhofs auf "Frankfurt West" geändert?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Max1234-ITA (2017-02-12 22:36:19+00:00): Hi Fredie,
it seems you caused some damages by deleting and unifying ways (i.e. landuses). 

Fortunately you also did a lot of useful mapping, and this is the reason I'm not proceeding with a full revert; instead, I'll try to restore some of the objects I have mapped, in the area of Cornale (PV) and Isola Sant'Antonio (AL). 

For questions, comments and discussions on mapping in Italy area, please feel free to join the Italian OSM mailng list, at http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html
(don't worry if you don't understand Italian, most of the users can speak English (and there is also some German guy)


Regards,
Max
Fredie (2017-02-13 08:29:39+00:00): I am sorry for this
no intention to discredit your work
Thank you for helping
I won't delete in future, I stopp completely OSM
Max1234-ITA (2017-02-13 09:24:19+00:00): Hi, sorry to hear that.
Mistakes happen to everyone, there's no reason to stop mapping if you like it. 
Just try to be a little more careful in the future ;-)

Max
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:45:53+00:00): [San Antonio, San Pedro, Laguna] add placeholder POI to convert to named street
user_5359 (2016-12-10 18:05:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
KKS (2016-12-11 00:17:32+00:00): нетреба по Ямполю дублювати в 2см лінію і проводить два ідентичних кордона які по факту є одним... як наприклад Ліс і вода. Є нанесена лінія води - ви її включаєте в новностворений вами мультиполігон.
Все шо ви понастворювали  дублем - видаляю.
szjjdd (2016-12-09 09:46:11+00:00): それと照明状況と舗装状況を追加
user_5359 (2016-12-10 18:05:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
muralito (2016-12-14 20:37:00+00:00): Hola. Favor de aclarar que querias mapear asi se corrije. Refugios alpinos en Uruguay no tienen sentido.
user_5359 (2016-12-10 06:52:41+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-10 06:52:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.

If you need help: You are welcome!
user_5359 (2016-12-10 06:51:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mueschel (2016-12-12 11:51:58+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node?
www.openstreetmap.org/node/1081202325

hi = tu - not a valid tag
noexit =yes - there is a footway and a service way, but no way that ends here.

Jan
user_5359 (2016-12-10 06:42:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
joost schouppe (2016-12-18 09:00:44+00:00): Bonjour Flavien,
Vous n'avez pas ajouté l'information sur quelle type de point est bna-bbot. On pourrait dire que c'est une type de galerie? Ou est-ce que c'est plutot l'office de l'organisation?
Avoir un categorie sur le point, le fait beaucoup plus facile a trouver (sur la carte et dans le base de dates)
woodpeck (2016-12-11 23:33:33+00:00): Hello, could you please explain what the data source "ruian" is? Is this building import documented on the Wiki? Has it been discussed on the mailing list?
JandaM (2016-12-12 05:55:41+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RUIAN

RUIAN data are manually traced in JOSM using Tracer plugin.
abDoug (2017-01-18 19:37:41+00:00): If you are going to add missing road names, please do it properly in a manner consistent with the way names are done in the locale.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 17:03:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44428248 where the changeset comment is: reverted because there was a problem with licence of data use
andygol (2016-12-11 21:49:50+00:00): кілька зауважень:
потрібно прибрати `addr:city` та виправити або прибрати `addr:full` (тут не повинно бути скорочень); в `description` виправити "Дніпропетровськ" -> "Дніпро"; ще раз уважно все перевірити…
Eugene Schava (2016-12-12 14:16:24+00:00): поправил теги, но теперь не только для города, но и всей Украины :)
"Дніпропетровськ" -> "Дніпро": это осталось от предыдущих авторов, я не менял
andygol (2016-12-12 16:19:00+00:00): 👍🏻

Треба ще перевірити назви вулиць в `addr:full` - здебільше застарілі назви (ще не декомунізовані)
Eugene Schava (2016-12-12 16:27:03+00:00): Я переместил addr:full в description, как это было раньше. Там адреса взятые напрямую с сайта, вручную их никто не менял
user_5359 (2016-12-10 06:14:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the existing node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2596447904 ? I have merge the booth nodes! Please looks on the different websites!

If you need help: You are welcome!
Stereo (2016-12-10 00:40:33+00:00): Hello! Les clôtures que tu as effacées existent en vrai; je les ai remises. C'est quoi le problème que tu rencontres avec xplane? On peut peut-être demander à Austin de corriger ça au niveau de xplane, ou trouver une autre façon de tagger ça.
Firefishy (2016-12-09 12:05:37+00:00): Dankie. Thanks for the fix, likely more in Sandton that could use your help... it has changed rapidly in the last few years.
fatuus (2016-12-09 14:10:44+00:00): Du kör stenhårt på skärgården! Grymt!!
emj (2016-12-14 13:56:38+00:00): Ett changeset om dagen är bra för magen, vet du... ;-)
user_5359 (2016-12-09 19:39:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
TheSwavu (2016-12-10 02:41:13+00:00): Yeap, constant problem everywhere you've got a river or coastline.

Apparently in OSM land the beach only goes down to the MHWMS.

Any boundary that's based on property boundaries will generally be referred to MHWM (which in OSM land is in the sea). But complicated by the fact that the property boundary is where the surveyor measured it and doesn't move until there is some legal reason to re-establish the boundary at which point there are a whole bunch of rules that determine where it has to moved to.

Lastly in NSW the council has control down to the low water mark (unless they have been gazetted other wise eg: only to the boundary of some DP and lot).

As a result we've tended to just import the boundaries from LPI and left them where they are.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:17:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-12-09 19:29:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Commodoortje (2016-12-09 14:41:19+00:00): Hoi Jos,

Aangezien je de omschrijving "test" gebruikt en dit je eerste edit (op dit account) is, en de changeset een behoorlijk complexe is. Ga ik ervanuit dat je ervaring hebt in het editen in OSM.
.
Zou je even kunnen en willen reageren?
de vries (2016-12-09 15:34:53+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset teruggedraaid. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44284686#map=15/51.6906/5.2958&layers=N

Ik ga er van uit dat je wat dingen aan het uitproberen was en je er niet van bewust was dat je wijzigingen in de osm database doorgevoerd zijn. Als je hulp nodig heb om je weg binnen osm te vinden, meld je dan op het forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
marczoutendijk (2016-12-09 16:27:42+00:00): Ik heb Jos ook een persoonlijke mail gestuurd met het verzoek om even te willen reageren.
Hjart (2016-12-09 12:51:03+00:00): Tak for dine bidrag. Jeg har dog rettet lidt på dem udfra hvad jeg kan se af Mapillary billeder på stedet: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/pooRItFxUDITtNiSxn3tEw
user_5359 (2016-12-09 19:11:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-09 19:10:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
user_5359 (2016-12-09 18:52:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the realtion https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27897900 ? Your entry is a duplicate entry to this area.
user_5359 (2016-12-09 18:04:07+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mueschel (2016-12-11 16:00:01+00:00): Hallo,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97672964
An diesem Weg hast du das Tag "zzz" gesetzt - kannst du das überprüfen?

Gruß, Jan
Ottonormalverbraucher (2016-12-12 17:51:09+00:00): Hallo Jan, danke für den Hinweis. Habe diesen Fehler mit dem Änderungssatz http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44352419 korrigiert. Gruß Ottonormalverbraucher.
Xelgen (2016-12-16 13:58:09+00:00): Խնդրում եմ ուշադիր լինել, դուք փոքր կենտրոնի մի քանի թաղամաս վերածել եք մի շենքի։
Xelgen (2016-12-16 13:58:19+00:00): Հետ փոխեցի։
maraf24 (2016-12-11 21:52:24+00:00): On jest jeszcze w budowie.
leszek89 (2017-01-24 12:10:40+00:00): 20 listopada został przekazany mieszkańcom
maraf24 (2017-01-24 13:05:21+00:00): Tak, już byłem i widziałem:)
Poprawiłem obrys budynku.
user_5359 (2016-12-09 17:44:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
jaap de vries (2017-02-14 13:57:39+00:00): Je hebt huizen en straten ( o.a. Zandekkers) ingetekend die helemaal niet bestaan. Ze moeten hier nog bouwen, ben er hier daadwerkelijk geweest?
Ik ben er vanmorgen nog geweest voor een hoogte meting
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
user_5359 (2016-12-09 17:39:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:00:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
user_5359 (2016-12-09 17:33:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-03 19:32:26+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
joost schouppe (2016-12-16 17:33:26+00:00): Op zich was het hier niet nodig om er een fietspad van te maken: de weg had reeds als eigenschap access=no, foot=yes en bicycle=yes. Dat betekent dus dat er niemand in mag, behalve voetgangers en fietsers. Dat klinkt verdacht veel als een fietspad natuurlijk :)
(doorgaans baseren we ons op een verkeersbord om iets als fietspad aan te duiden)
De access=no is nu eigenlijk overbodig geworden, want dat is verondersteld bij een fietspad.
user_5359 (2016-12-09 17:30:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your website, because she isn’t for international access.
user_5359 (2016-12-09 17:21:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If an existing trail is private, don’t delete the track, better add access=private to the way.

I have revert your changeset!
mavl (2017-10-21 06:00:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
PT-53 (2017-01-06 08:44:38+00:00): Hallo Molker,
wenn Du schon Straßen aufspaltest solltest Du diese dabei nicht trennen, wie hier:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=81138459
Bitte wieder korrekt verbinden.
Sind 7,7 km kreuzungsfrei, davon 6,2 km mit Überholverbot,  schon ein trunk ?
PT-53 (2017-01-12 11:52:19+00:00): Siehe auch diesen Karten-Hinweis:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/847100#map=14/47.9422/9.7559&layers=N
PT-53 (2017-01-18 16:59:06+00:00): Hallo Molker,
wäre schön wenn Du mal Deinen Fehler korrigierst. Eine Antwort wäre auch nicht schlecht!
Molker (2017-01-18 17:09:47+00:00): Hallo PT-53, ehrlich gesagt, weiß ich nicht genau, wovon Du sprichst. Wenn mir da ein Fehler unterlaufen ist, und Dir fällt er auf, dann berichtige ihn doch. Dafür ist das Format ja offen. Trotzdem danke, dass Du mich angeschrieben hast. Liebe Grüße, Volker
PT-53 (2017-01-18 19:06:38+00:00): Hast Du die Straßen wieder korrekt verbunden ?
Aus Fehler kann man lernen, sofern man weis, daß man Fehler gemacht hat. Deshalb meine Info an Dich - mit der Bitte um Erledigung.
Ist ein kreuzungsfreier Straßenabschnitt von 7,7 km, von denen 6,2 km mit Überholverbot sind, schon ein trunk ? Ich meine Nein, so wie einige Andere!
PT-53 (2017-01-18 19:09:08+00:00): Zieh mal an diesem Knoten: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4546537151. Dann siehst Du daß die Straßen dort nicht korrekt verbunden sind!
Molker (2017-01-18 22:09:40+00:00): Hey PT-53, ich weiß wirklich nicht, wovon Du redest. Du bist auch nicht mein Papi, der mir sagt, was ich machen soll. Ich war auch nie bei der NVA. Also, wenn was falsch ist und Dich stört, mache es doch einfach heil. Jeder soll das machen, was er kann. Bitte. Und ja, Trunks werden überall in OSM anders - je nach Region - gesehen und begründet. Das wird in D auch immer wieder anders kartographiert. Wie auch immer, ich sehe es als Trunk, wie auch einige andere. Also, ciao, Volker
PT-53 (2017-01-19 09:25:27+00:00): Sorry wenn ich Dich überfordert habe. Ich habe die Straßen deshalb jetzt wieder selbst korrekt verbunden.         Wie Du ja zugibst, gibt es verschiedene Auffassungen darüber, was ein trunk ist. Nur scheinst Du Deine Meinung großflächig in Deutschland durchsetzen zu wollen. Du machst da immer wieder neue Anläufe.
Molker (2017-01-19 09:51:39+00:00): Also, ich denke nicht einmal, dass die SERVICE ROAD und der TRACK mit der Straße verbunden werden sollten. Die SERVICE ROAD ist von der B30 nicht zu erreichen. Da ist eine weiße, durchgängige Linie und ein Zaun! Es gibt zwar Asphalt, aber abbiegen kann man da nicht. Da diese Daten hier auch zur Navigation genutzt werden, sollte die B30 von der SERVICE ROAD getrennt werden. Das gleiche gilt auch für den TRACK, nur dass da kein Zaun ist. Die weiße, durchgängige Linie darf auch da keiner überfahren. Vielleicht kommen wir ha an diesem speziellen Punkt doch noch zusammen. Danke, Volker
PT-53 (2017-01-19 11:25:48+00:00): Bei den durchgezogenen Linie am Straßenrand handelt es sich um Fahrbahnbegrenzungen, die - im Gegensatz zu Fahrstreifenbegrenzungen - sehr wohl überfahren werden dürfen.
Molker (2017-01-19 12:48:17+00:00): Beide, Fahrbahnbegrenzungen und Fahrstreifenbegrenzungen, die aus durchgezogenen Linien bestehen, dürfen generell nicht überfahren werden. Das ist nun mal klar geregelt.
PT-53 (2017-01-19 12:57:05+00:00): Wo ? Im Bußgeldkatalog gibts nur Strafen für das Überfahren der Fahrstreifenbegrenzung, nicht aber für das Überfahren der Fahrbahnbegrenzung. Das gleiche steht sinngemäß in Wikipedia !
PT-53 (2017-01-19 12:58:47+00:00): Link zum Bußgeldkatalog: https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/fahrstreifenbegrenzung/  Link zu Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrbahnmarkierung#L.C3.A4ngsmarkierungen
YannC (2016-12-27 22:45:11+00:00): I noticed you removed the natural=wood on this poly (241557886) that covers most of the island. Is it a mistake or part of world domination plan still in the making? ;)
Tom Layo (2016-12-27 23:20:18+00:00): Sometimes I remove woodland for a few minutes so I can see better to draw roads etc. I just forgot to put it back. I sure hope deforestation is not so bad yet! Thanks!