piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:41:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:53:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
eggie (2018-06-22 13:34:42+00:00): De weg staat nog steeds op construction= secondary.. dat zal er ook af moeten. 
MVG,
Eggie
A67-A67 (2018-06-27 14:43:15+00:00): Deze weg is alleen richting het oosten opengesteld voor alle verkeer. Richting het westen is de weg alleen toegankelijk voor bussen. Ik heb de wegenstructuur hersteld.
eggie (2018-06-22 13:35:55+00:00): construction = secondary svp verwijderen Doe je dat zelf?
eggie (2018-06-22 13:36:36+00:00): construction = secondary svp verwijderen Doe je dat zelf?
eggie (2018-06-22 20:01:01+00:00): Construction secondary verwijderd van wegen
eggie (2018-06-26 14:08:33+00:00): PB contact gehad
dieterdreist (2020-12-12 16:27:52+00:00): Changeset genannt in Diskussion https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71409
mavl (2018-07-20 15:40:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:27:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:23:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:50:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:51:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
amatissart (2018-06-23 17:04:19+00:00): Hi zirael,
Thanks for your contributions on OSM.
The poi "Panthéon" you created does already exist and is actually tagged on the building itself.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16407465 where tags "tourism" and "opening_hours" are already defined.
So I think this new node is redundant and should be deleted.
letihu (2018-10-29 15:36:59+00:00): Ein Fußweg ist dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395469930/history
noch nicht. (jetzt path)
Der tag electrified:no ohne Bahn ist auch nicht richtig. Vielleicht könnte der Weg noch besser gemappt werden.
Nehaj (2018-10-25 13:29:15+00:00): Rückgängig gemacht in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63867551 – Man kann nicht sagen, dass man das Tagging aufräumt und dann bei mehren Anschlussgleisen das service=spur vergessen. Vorher war's weniger falsch!
literan (2018-06-23 11:35:44+00:00): живых людей (а также облака, собак и прочие движущиеся объекты) мы на карту не добавляем
G_P_J (2021-12-14 10:43:53+00:00): Cześć, czy możesz wskazać źródło dla pasów w osi wschód-zachód? Skąd informacja o istnieniu pasa Suliszew 1? Na jednym z pasów jest budynek mieszkalny. Pozdrawiam,
Piotr
mueschel (2018-06-29 10:40:05+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600771620
caps lock and auto-completion don't combine well.
DK7080BE (2018-06-22 17:59:46+00:00): Jeg tror at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521667199 , dvs. den vej der sydfra drejer af mod Vallensbækvej, skal være highway=primary_link
Matthew Darwin (2018-07-15 16:10:32+00:00): Hello, CHEO (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario) is already in OSM, so I am deleting your duplicate entry.
Jarek 🚲 (2019-01-12 05:04:35+00:00): Unfortunately both entries for Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5711674341 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5711621752) are in completely wrong locations.

Sick Kids (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5711537321) also duplicates the existing https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2393230
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-12 18:27:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60661711 where the changeset comment is: Reverting potential copyright violations by mentioning Bayernatlas as source
BCNorwich (2018-06-24 06:43:20+00:00): Hi, you inadvertently drew these two building on top of existing buildings. I have deleted the duplicates for you.
Regards Bernard.
JJIglesias (2018-06-22 18:02:47+00:00): Las rutas de transporte se hacen construyendo relaciones y NO dibujando lineas sobre caminos y vias ya existentes. Por Favor elimina esa linea q pusiste sobre la via y leete los tutoriales que te envie sobre como editar OSM; este tipo de cambios como el que hiciste SOLO DAÑA el mapa no lo mejora....
Gracias
alfredynho (2018-06-27 15:05:27+00:00): Gracias lo borrare
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-23 16:02:59+00:00): Elwood's not really major enough to warrant an upgrade.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60078668
BCNorwich (2018-06-22 18:22:45+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reversed several of the changes you made to permissive footpaths and permissive bridleways to conform to OSM best practice and http://cwr.naturalengland.org.uk/mapboards/pdfs/AG00294649B.pdf, also taking note of the several times I've walked these ways.

Amended the Saham Toney playing field. 

Returned Node: 2329776280 to it's original position as it dragged several highways out of place.

Regards Bernard
eggie (2018-06-22 17:00:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-22 17:03:49+00:00): Je gebied van je edit is zo groot omdat je de bergendensestraat hebt vastgeplak aan een administratieve grens.
Tip: linker Alt toets vasthouden en ID plakt niet :)
Ik zal zo kijken of het gemakkelijk los te maken is.
eggie (2018-06-22 17:24:18+00:00): grens ligt weer los van wegen
eggie (2018-06-22 17:04:50+00:00): Zelfde verhaal. Je plakt de wegen aan de grenzen vast. dat is niet de bedoeling.
eggie (2018-06-22 17:06:44+00:00): Dit is aardig gelukt. Ik zie een weg die geen tags heeft bij nummer 5. Het is alleen een lege lijn.
eggie (2018-06-22 17:26:37+00:00): highway=service van gemaakt
eggie (2018-06-22 17:08:09+00:00): Je hebt het water op het gras gelegd. dat hoort eigenlijk apart te liggen. Leg je het helemaal in het gras dan wordt het echt ingewikkeld. Beter is het hier dus om dat gras eromheen te leggen.
eggie (2018-06-22 17:26:54+00:00): gras van water gehaald...
Filip-7 (2018-06-22 19:52:20+00:00): Droga jest nadal jednokierunkowa, jednak wprowadzono na niej kontraruch rowerowy (dwukierunkowa dla rowerów, lecz nie dla pozostałych pojazdów).
etkth58 (2018-06-22 20:45:19+00:00): Faktycznie, zobaczyłem że na końcu ulicy jest znak zakazu wjazdu z wyłączeniem rowerów. Zmyliły mnie samochody jadące "pod prąd". Drogówka może tam zarobić…
mueschel (2018-06-23 16:52:52+00:00): Hi,
this looks like an import of at least 82 schools.
The source you give ("ESRI") is obviously wrong. Where can we find the obligatory description of this import?

Also, all these nodes have many strange tags which don't look like they belong in the OSM database like these:
    CapacitÃ�=-4.864
    Date_mod=20/05/2018
    Longitude=14.193
    OBJECTID=3096
    Province=Kongo Central
    Source=UNICEF
    type=school

Could you please check and fix these issues?
mueschel (2018-07-08 11:52:14+00:00): I removed those tags and fixed the spelling of e.g. "source".  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60507474
glglgl (2018-06-25 07:18:30+00:00): Something weird happened to the boundary relation of Lorenzo Parodi.
MunicipalidadDePergamino (2018-06-25 10:55:12+00:00): Hola, faltaba cambiar el punto que indicaba el nombre del barrio, pasó a ser "Atahualpa Yupanqui" en lugar de "Parodi". Espero que esté bien.
user_5359 (2018-06-23 04:36:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
If you need help: You are welocme!
kreuzschnabel (2019-10-23 11:10:38+00:00): Hallo Jbah, wenn jemand anders den Track zurückbaut, wäre es schön, wenn du erst nachfragen würdest, bevor du ihn wieder nach veraltetem Luftbild reinmalst :) er ist nicht mehr da, von der Tongrube aufgefressen. 
 
Luftbild-Tipp: Die Maxar-Bilder sind hier ziemlich aktuell, ich schätze vom Sommer 2018.
Jbah (2019-10-24 16:20:01+00:00): Entschuldigung.

Kann mich nicht mehr nachvollziehen wieso ich hier was gemappt hatte.

Habe aber auf jeden Fall nicht bewusst  einen nicht mehr vorhandenen Track eingefügt.
kreuzschnabel (2019-10-24 17:32:28+00:00): Laut https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584457617/history habe ich ihn am 29. April 2018 bis auf einen kurzen Stummel an der östlichen Seite zurückgestutzt (ähnlich wie jetzt), von seinem Ende nach Westen sah es so aus: https://ibb.co/Tb5hHX9 – Am 22. Juni hast du ihn dann wieder bis an die Moschheimer Straße verlängert :)
Enock4seth (2018-06-22 20:02:36+00:00): Got your back. Cleaned it up :). Thanks for mapping
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:39:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:53:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Sylvain M (2026-01-30 12:27:37+00:00): Hi @Chrisi_LE
I notice that most of the ‘natural=water’ features in this changeset are shifted about 100 metres east of the bodies of water visible on all available satellite images.
This is a shame, as they have very high geometric accuracy: could there have been a problem with the projection system at the time of import?

Example with this way :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600819564
Nakaner (2018-07-01 12:29:28+00:00): Hi Mack80,

various features you added are located on roads. Could you please open our online editor at https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=60081965#map=16/43.6487/-79.3961 log in with your account and move them to the correct location. I assume that you have local knowledge and know where they should be located.

Best regards

Michael
Jarek 🚲 (2019-01-31 22:50:52+00:00): dragged the stores that were in the middle of the road to their hopefully-more-or-less-correct locations in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66817293
freebeer (2018-06-22 21:01:01+00:00): Howdy,
Congrats on graduating from maps.me to iD.  Now if we can get you addicted to Potla^H^H^H^H^H JOSM, our plans for world domination will be that much closer to fulfillment.
Your edits look fine.  You corrected naming issues that caught my eye.  So what remains are nit-pickings.
First, for the phone number, we prefer the international format.  That is, drop the leading zero and add the country code.  Which I expect might be something like +41.  Or maybe +44 or +43.  Actually I've no idea as I never use the phone despite having be employed by a telecom.  Which is why the country code is important so the number is valid worldwide.  For all I know, the +4* might be rubbish down here.
.
Being in the Alto Aldige / Suedtirol bi-lingual region, is there a distinct name:de german name?  It would not surprise me if not, as even in german regions the italian restaurants are known as Trattoria.
.
A personal niggle, while it is perfectly fine, it catches me eye to see an end/closing time of 0 hours rather than 24 hours.  That may be from my broadcasting background or something, but I have no problems parsing 24:00h closing time while 00:00h for some reason makes me engage my brain (to be avoided at all costs).  No need to change this.
.
As far as I can see, by adding the outdoor seating, you have addressed the concern you raised in your maps.me auto-opened bug-report, which I categorised as a personal bookmark (grouping it with such contributions as `best restaurant evah') when perhaps my stock response should have been `on the map', for cases where a bug report is opened for an existing mapped object.
.
Allow me to say welcome to iD and OSM and the universe and everything, please keep on contributing, and do not let my bulk dismissal of your maps.me bug report discourage you.
Other more advanced mappers may point out issues I have overlooked as a beginner.
grazie e ciao
mueschel (2018-06-23 16:44:29+00:00): Could you please check this import? It created hundreds of areas with foreign tags, that don't look like they should appear in the OSM database, like the ones below.
    commune=78117
    contenance=6521
    created=2007-02-21
    id=78117000AK0068
    numero=68
    prefixe=000
    section=AK
    updated=2014-02-21

I also doubt that  landuse=grass for these - this looks more like private gardens, a "landcover=grass" would be more appropriate.
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 08:42:54+00:00): Hi Simon,
I'm writing because you asked a review. Your changes look good! 
You could add a building passing passage at nr. 11 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel#tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage)
Keep up the good work. 
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
blubberblubb (2018-06-26 12:00:14+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel,

Thanks, didn't know that existed! Could you take a look at the follow-up changeset? I'm not quite clear on how to represent stairs in the building passage: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60180384

Thanks!
felipeeugenio (2018-06-23 11:31:45+00:00): Hola Mario
Existe este camino? No lo veo en las fotos satelitales. Tengo la idea de que la plaza se acaba mucho antes.
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 08:45:21+00:00): Hi Simon,
I'm writing because you asked for a review. The changes look good, thanks for contributing. 
Cheers,dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 08:45:35+00:00): Hi Simon,
I'm writing because you asked for a review. The changes look good, thanks for contributing. 
Cheers,dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 08:51:35+00:00): Hi Simon,
I'm writing because you asked a review. You've created both an area and a node as parking (see the 2 P's rendered).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600836964
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5711984456
I would advice to remove the separate node and move the additional tags from the node into the area (for explanation see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dparking&uselang=en-GB#Tags).
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
blubberblubb (2018-06-26 11:47:29+00:00): Thanks! corrected.
dikkeknodel (2018-06-26 11:52:34+00:00): Happy to help! Cheers
kre3d (2018-06-22 19:45:42+00:00): Are you sure there is a cemetery there? It looks like someone's front yard.
Carnildo (2018-06-23 00:19:20+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

A couple things to keep in mind for future mapping:

1) The usual practice for mapping schools is to put the school name on the school grounds, and only put a name on the school building if it's different from the school name.

2) "Living Street" is pretty much purely a European concept.  You can find the tags for ordinary streets by searching for "road".

3) Make sure the roads you're adding are connected properly.  The extension of Clodfelter Road you added was only connected at one end.

I've fixed the problems for you here, but it's something to remember.
DanteVento (2018-06-23 00:30:25+00:00): Thanks for the tips on the "living street" and school formatting. I will definitely keep those in mind.

On your 3rd point, Clodfelter Road doesn't connect there anymore. So while it should have been a "road" it was purposefully not connected. I live in the area and the satellite image being used here is fairly old.
Carnildo (2018-06-23 01:45:14+00:00): For a road that seems like it should connect but doesn't, there's a way to indicate that, but it's not the most obvious thing in the world.  Click on the end of the road (you should get a pulsing circle to show that just the end has been selected rather than the whole road) and search for a tag called "no exit".  I've updated the road in question to match your description.
DanteVento (2018-06-23 01:54:09+00:00): Thank you! I'll try and be more meticulous until I've got a better feel for the process.