piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-05 05:36:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81803899 where the changeset comment is: Multiple ramps changed without regard to geometry, lane placement or lane tagging.
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-06-23 02:55:03+00:00): Hola, importES
Esta vía fluvial cruza la carretera (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/778435230). ¿Es esto un túnel?¿O podrías ayudarnos a solucionarlo?
Gracias, feliz mapeo!
ToniE (2020-03-05 08:42:48+00:00): Hi Jarek,

good job. I was also thinking about how to include local languages for international lines.

You might want to have a look on 

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/EU/index.php

to see the effect (5th column) and to check (1st column)  whether there ist still something to do.

Maybe you might also get in contact with user 'marcoSt' who is working a lot on Flixbus.

Best regards
Toni
Supaplex (2020-06-18 14:35:03+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
NyanSten (2020-03-22 22:46:41+00:00): Hi, the road between Falease'ela and Falelatai is definitely not a secondary road. It's a dirt road in a really bad state and is pretty much impassable with a normal car.
Skagit2 (2020-03-24 05:30:51+00:00): Okay. I was classifying it based on its relative importance for this part of the island rather than its physical characteristics, but if it is that bad we should leave it as unclassified and tertiary. Thanks for reaching out!
Your Village Maps (2020-04-12 21:37:18+00:00): Thanks for adding to and editing OSM, but I have a problem with you renaming C-470 as "Centennial Freeway". I can find no mention online anywhere about such a change. I live in the area. In fact, over the last two years or so it has been getting widened, adding TOLL/HOV lanes; I am certain that no one would approve of naming such a highway a "freeway". It also doesn't run through the suburb of Centennial; it actually runs through the suburbs of Lone Tree and Highlands Ranch.  Since I have no doubt that this name change is wrong, I am going to go ahead and revert it to "C-470" which is what locals refer to it as.
katpatuka (2020-05-17 16:50:00+00:00): Hello 完善区划,

I've changed the north-western boundary of 贡井区 and aligned it parallel to waterways - tell me please if I was wrong;

https://osm.org/relation/2791315
Supaplex (2020-03-05 06:29:59+00:00): 公園的範圍不應與道路相連
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81801855
user_10714872 (2021-04-29 16:09:11+00:00): 你好，请在画某些道路的时候，不要一条直线带过
user_5359 (2020-03-05 16:02:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
user_5359 (2020-03-05 16:04:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-07 07:43:43+00:00): Please mind the placement tags as well, placement=* tags indicate where on the roadway the way tag is landing along it.  placement=transition indicates where a lane is departing from the start of the gore painted on the road (like, literally next to it) and ends at the start of the ramp.  Also looks like some turn lanes on the approach to exit 23 was wiped out.

If you're working on lanes, id is probably not a good editor right now due to the lack of visualization for this information, which is consumed by navigation systems.


Is exit 23 really one lane now?
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-07 07:47:09+00:00): Also is the ramp for the HOV lanes on the left just west of 23 really starting much farther south as you put it now, compared to where it's located on the Bing imagery where I put it?
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-07 07:48:00+00:00): Also looks like you were trying to mitigate a lane change restriction by extending the ramp... there's change:lanes for that, which is what I had going on there.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-07 07:49:43+00:00): Basically, I'm trying to work out how the south end of the HOV ramps end because it's causing problems for navigation systems if it's starting earlier than exists in reality.
Beachmiles (2020-03-07 08:48:31+00:00): Ya my Tesla was having trouble with this interchange for a long time always trying to get in the far left HOV lane to the 605 instead of staying on the 405N HOV lane and I believe I finally had it fixed but recently the partial issue showed up when the Tesla was putting its left signal on when it shouldn't have prob due to the lane counts becoming wrong. With my last drive my Tesla did good and dint 
Yes the HOV offramp bridge starts a bit further north, I moved it a bit further southeast than needed in an attempt to solidify that lane as a separate entity. Feel free to move it further north again but ideally the cars should pick those HOV lanes quite a ways before they split.

Here is where the ramp really starts raising.
https://www.google.com/maps/place/33%C2%B046'30.6%22N+118%C2%B005'12.1%22W/@33.775165,-118.0872545,312m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x0:0x0!7e2!8m2!3d33.7751649!4d-118.0867063
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-07 16:44:19+00:00): Yeah, I think we were trying to solve the same problem.   If you open in Id and have the background set to Bing, does that imagery match what you're seeing on the ground?  I honestly only go through that interchange maybe once or twice every ten years myself since I moved away.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-07 17:22:36+00:00): OK, I doublechecked it against Mapillary imagery from January to confirm and updated based on what I saw.

Also looking at this more and working knowledge of how interstates work, I'm thinking 605 departs from 405, not 22, and the ramps between 22 and 605 are just ramps?
Beachmiles (2020-03-12 06:11:29+00:00): It looks like the change you made may have broken the Tesla autopilot FSD navigation again at this interchange.
 Ive been traveling this road every day for the past 5 years and have been using the carpool lane exclusively with the Tesla for the past 6 months. The 1st couple months my car would always try and get in the wrong far left lane which goes to the 605 instead of staying on the rightmost HOV lane.

After I found out the car uses openstreetmaps for much of the navigation I started making updates and it finally started taking the correct route. Will take another look at it tonight, may try moving that ramp a little more eastbound because that seemed to help.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-12 12:56:28+00:00): I might also recommend doublechecking with Tesla on this one before going for that, there's no reason it shouldn't be able to handle the way it's mapped now.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-12 13:00:21+00:00): Yeah, looking at it now, it looks like the mapping is now bugged.  If that fixed your Tesla, the map should still be fixed to match reality and you need to work with Tesla to fix a bug on their side.
user_5359 (2020-03-05 16:51:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
aharvey (2020-03-05 06:04:20+00:00): I've changed this to highway=service + service=driveway + access=private
Saipavan Siddarth (2020-03-05 14:35:13+00:00): Thank you for giving valuable suggestion/feedback. I'll pay closer attention to these things.

Regards,
SaiPavan Siddarth
cbeddow (2020-12-05 23:10:30+00:00): Nice mapping! It's not on Gaia GPS yet but I just hiked it today. :) Adding a few details
b-jazz (2020-12-06 00:48:41+00:00): Credit really goes to GoColeGo. I just made a minor edit.
eggie (2020-03-05 07:25:51+00:00): Welkom Stijn bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. Gebouwen in OSM worden geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. Een schuurtje zal daar soms niet instaan. Je kunt dat dan zelf intekenen. name=schuurtje 34 hoort dan weer niet. Ook heeft het geen adres. Adressen zijn ook import in de vorm van adresnodes.
Ik pas even wat aan.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 07:50:02+00:00): name=....... en adres verwijderd.
Veel plezier met mappen verder.

MVG,
eggie
stijnheeres (2020-03-05 15:54:29+00:00): bedankt doei
4004 (2020-03-08 23:26:03+00:00): возможно с генштаба кто то утащил, если вы местный, то вам больше веры конечно
flyingmint (2020-03-05 09:28:02+00:00): 官方說明文件裡面，這種道路本不像高速公路那樣是各自獨立的道路，不必要多畫一條啊。
還有新吉庄那邊你為何又把錯誤圖資復原上來，而且新添的建築也不正確。
Joseph E (2020-08-03 04:53:17+00:00): Why did you change the classification of ways in this changeset? Do you have any local knowledge of Papua, Indonesia? What standards are you using to decide if a road should be =trunk, =primary, or =secondary?

If you read Indonesian, have you read the documentation from users in this country?
voyagerRB (2020-08-04 18:38:16+00:00): Hi Joseph E. 
On this changeset I was doing looking at the greater road network and seeing if there were any roads that seemed less prominent than others nearby of the same classification. For instance, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702590580, I saw it was the same classification of the more prominent secondary just to the south of it here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584330524. And here on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297906602, I downgraded from secondary to tertiary since it only goes to a small village and ends there. I hope this gives you some insight into my decision making process. 
Cheers!
Joseph E (2020-08-05 23:01:23+00:00): I would recommend checking the Indonesian tagging standards in this document: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads

Generally all parts of the Jalan Trans-Papua should be highway=trunk once they are completed (though most are still under construction). Other main roads which connect different Kabupaten (Regencies, admin_level=5 administrative areas) are highway=primary, or the main roads through towns and cities. Then highway=secondary connects districts (kecematan) to towns and other districts (kecematan), while highway=tertiary connects villages (desa) or suburbs (kelurahan) to other desa and kelurahan, or to a larger town. The tag highway=unclassified is only used for a "road [which] connects activity centers in rural areas and is an interconnection between two small hamlets (dusun) or neighborhoods or between a hamlet and isolated farms or houses."
In Eastern Indoneisa, especially Papua, any of these might be unpaved (except for highway=trunk) in rural areas, though highway=primary should be mostly paved, and will almost always be paved in towns. A highway=secondary or highway=tertiary will often only be 1 lane wide (4 meters) if it is paved, and most are unpaved outside of towns.
voyagerRB (2020-08-06 18:17:23+00:00): Thanks for that information Joseph E! This is useful context and I’ll keep it in mind. 
Best.
tastrax (2020-03-22 03:14:21+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM - Cheers
abakus_uploader (2020-03-05 23:30:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SL_Mapper (2020-03-06 19:33:34+00:00): Hi, these road segments are not belongs to E001. Crossing local roads with U turns and concrete paved most of parts these segments. Also not meeting the minimum requirement << highway=motorway should be used only on roads with control of access, or selected roads with limited access>>  This is the old Mattala Airport Access Road. E001 ends after the Airport access ramp (with E001 extension project). Kindly revert the edit or let me know what we can do.
Kanchenjunga (2020-03-08 23:34:09+00:00): Thanks for commenting. Since the road is still very important as the main route to the airport and E001 from the east, but it is not controlled access, should we classify it as trunk instead of primary or motorway?
SL_Mapper (2020-03-09 05:51:21+00:00): I already classified as a trunk highway, following the original classification of the first change set drawn by Thilina.
Fra00 (2020-03-07 19:31:48+00:00): Può spiegare il motivo di questa modifica che ha cancellato edifici e strade e compromesso le forme di altri? Grazie
matteo_biglioli (2020-03-09 07:46:27+00:00): è stato un tentativo di eliminare una self intersection presente sui poligoni in quella zona, sfortunatamente mi sono in seguito scordato di sistemare le strade
user_5359 (2020-03-05 16:38:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
user_5359 (2020-03-05 16:37:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
iriman (2020-03-05 10:57:11+00:00): Hi. Recently these u-turns were blocked. At first the left one has been blocked by Jersey barrier and I did it on OSM. I live in Arak and checked it some weeks ago. I also put a barrier=jersey_barrier there (https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=77793517). Some days later another user removed the right link too (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80461169). I know he did this based on their users' report from Neshan app.
However I'm not sure if they've opened again or not but assumed that user did the right thing, so made the barrier longer to cover the right u-turn (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/751425937).
Do you received a report on this that these were opened again, or mapped it based on satellite imagery? 
Thanks
kooky_toky (2020-03-07 01:49:28+00:00): Hi Iriman, thank you for commenting. I mapped the u-turns based on Maxar Premium Imagery which is probably outdated in this case. The OSM wiki does say that jersey barriers should be added to a node along the highway, so I propose we leave the ways but add barrier tags to the nodes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Djersey_barrier
iriman (2020-03-07 16:31:44+00:00): Thank you for the information. Actually I mapped it as a way to be a hint that no longer u-turns exist. Your suggestion is also acceptable to me. Could you please do it?
iriman (2020-03-09 09:17:03+00:00): Thanks for the fix!
aachso (2020-03-08 05:34:57+00:00): Danke für's korrigieren. Magst du noch den Straßennamen angleichen (also "Straße" statt "Str."), so wie die Straße auch benannt ist?

PS: Wenn du auf einen Changeset-Kommentar antwortest, mach bitte einen Kommentar unter das Changeset (also das Textfeld hier benutzen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80729202). Wenn du, so wie hier, den Text eines neuen Changesets verwendest, ist der Kontext unklar und die Beteiligten werden darüber nicht benachrichtigt. Schöne Grüße
andrewwiseman (2020-03-05 23:13:39+00:00): Hello. I don't believe this should be a motorway. Motorways are only roads with controlled access, which means there should be no at-grade intersections or roundabouts:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway
Here are intersections: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/40.163651965663476/44.404907544573106

Also if you can be a bit more descriptive in your changeset comments that would be great. In this changeset I don't see changing any borders or buildings.
Luzandro (2020-03-06 17:20:51+00:00): Hi,

I've added a place=isolated_dwelling with name "Pontesford Hill" and changed the 3 addresses accordingly from addr:street to addr:place="Pontesford Hill", so Nominatim should find them (currently the houses are only found if you search for the housename).
I don't know if the place "Pontesford Hill" is now rendered too prominently or otherwise irritating.

See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:place

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Disolated_dwelling

regards
Andreas
SK53 (2020-03-07 21:06:05+00:00): Hi Andreas,
If there are 10-11 houses, I'd probably go with hamlet rather than isolated dwelling. The latter is, in practice, a very rarely used tag in the UK. Where it has been used (by one mapper) they nearly all should be addr:housename. There are possibly a few places in Scotland where isolated_dwelling is appropriate, but there is often a better locality usage (e.g., Ballygrogan).

Jerry
Luzandro (2020-03-08 05:57:34+00:00): Hi Jerry,

I was also not totally convinced if isolated dwelling is really appropriate, but it's the best fitting place I could think of. Badger Dom was trying desperately to get Nominatim to find the address - which it now does - and the only other way I could think of would be to add a fake "Pontesford Hill" street name to the track.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72848736

See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68805

Andreas
aharvey (2020-03-05 10:04:03+00:00): I've added access=private to these as they aren't public roads.
eggie (2020-03-05 10:00:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

MVG,
Eggie
rskedgell (2020-03-06 12:40:36+00:00): You may not feel that there is a need for a separate footpath, but someone has taken the time to survey and map it. Some people find them useful for pedestrian routing and navigation, so unless the mapped objects are actually incorrect, please do not delete them.

The user whose edit you deleted has been doing  a lot of work refining the mapping of walking routes, where the side of the road and where you cross actually matter.

The locations and types of crossing and how they link to the footway are also useful for pedestrian routing as they can provide additional accessibility information.

Please consider reverting your edit.

Please also see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation
ramthelinefeed (2020-03-06 12:59:48+00:00): I routinely map pavements separately (using the 'sidewalk' tag), including these ones. 
In this instance, the main motivation is to add clarity as to how they interact with a cycle route (as some bits of the cycle route involve a shared-use footway). 
They are also of considerable use to planning accessible routes for wheelchair users etc. 
If they're accurately mapped I can't see any merit in deleting them. You might as well delete all the houses on the adjacent streets on the basis that individual houses haven't yet been mapped on most London roads.
Mapper79404 (2020-03-06 14:43:48+00:00): Hi! Thank you both for reviewing - I really wasn't sure about this one, and I'm glad for the feedback.  As it happens, the only reason I even took an interest here was a series of Osmose bugs reported along that path (visible in Vespucci), as well as noticing that the separately-drawn sidewalk seemed to stop randomly along the edge of the park. Finally, speaking as a longtime user but not editor of OSM, I found the inconsistency quite surprising - I can intuitively understand that (for example) not all houses, benches, park paths etc are mapped yet, but it's odd (to someone that doesnt have the context you just shared) to see a sidewalk on just one side of a street.  If I didn't know the area, I'd have assumed there was just one side of the street I can walk on, and that it suddenly stops about 30 meters before the junction with Waller Road, and conclude I'd be much better off just avoiding the area entirely.  Presumably that also causes routing issues?  In short, I wonder if, rather than reverting, there's a way for me to add tags etc to the features as they stand in order to make sure everything routes OK, including for cyclists, walkers and wheelchair users, as you mentioned?  I didn't see major issues with doing things that way in the wiki you helpfully directed me to.  Happy to share a screenshot of what it looked like, and/or the Osmose bugs, by email if that helps form a view either way?
ramthelinefeed (2020-03-06 14:53:43+00:00): I agree it can be a bit arbitrary where a footway stops (i.e. where I give up mapping it ;) 
Where possible, I will try and tie the end of the sidewalk back onto the parent road, but I don't always manage that.
In reality, there is almost twice as much footway as there is carriageway all round London, so no one editor can ever include it all... I find I just have to pragmatically add in more detail in a particular location of interest, and accept that slowly over the years more and more detail will appear as other editors contribute. If we all just give up before we begin, no open source project would ever work! :)
rskedgell (2020-03-06 16:34:55+00:00): When I map sidewalks/footways, I do try to map both sides as highway=footway + footway=sidewalk (or highway=cycleway + cycleway=sidewalk + segregated=*) in order for a sidewalk=separate tag on the main carriageway to be consistent.

Sometimes it isn't practical to reach the ideal of mapping both sides, due to the available imagery, but is still useful for a walking or cycling route relation. There are parts of the Capital Ring path where the side of the road matters, as the signs and route markers are often only on one side of the road.

In some parts of London there is very good OS map imagery available via NLS historic maps which even shows the kerb line for roads substantially unaltered since the 1960s.
BCNorwich (2020-03-05 19:57:00+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The woods are near Ruislip but isn't the name Bayhurst Wood as tagged on the woods perimeter line. Could you check and amend if necessary?

Regards Bernard.
DanBUK (2020-03-05 20:09:59+00:00): Hey Bernard, I had the same conversation with the person I was with. Information Board had Ruislip Woods, but I am aware it's locally Bayhurst Wood as part of the set of woods around Ruislip. I'll be back there soon to take a photo and clarify.
BCNorwich (2020-03-06 07:46:53+00:00): Hi, 
I searched the web and found out "Ruislip Woods now consists of Bayhurst Wood, Copse Wood, Mad Bess Wood, Park Wood, Poor's Field/Ruislip Common, the Ruislip Local Nature Reserve, The Northern Finger, Grub Ground, Tarleton's Lake and surrounding land in Hillingdon. Ruislip Woods National Nature Reserve, at 305 hectares or 755 acres, is the biggest single area of woodland in Greater London."

So the notice board must be about the greater area of woods, not limited to the section that it's in. It might be a good idea to make a relation of the greater area of Ruislip Woods.
I've added a description and website to your POI.

Regards Bernard.