piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2022-02-18 09:40:29+00:00): Ja, ist o.K.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:34:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
PT-53 (2022-02-18 07:52:28+00:00): Hallo Herr Kuc,
ich habe in Pflummern soeben dieses Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032822137/history
anhand des Maxar-Luftbildes grob eingezeichnet und den Feuerwehr-Knoten in dieses verschoben.

Sie haben als Adresse die Haus-Nr. 14 eingetragen. Diese ist aber - gem. der amtlichen Karte Maps4BW - bereits für dieses Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248643654
verwendet.
Müßte das neue Feuerwehrgebäude nicht die Haus-Nr. 10 haben?
Fragende Grüße
Stefan Kuc (2022-02-18 09:19:26+00:00): Oh ja, das war falsch. Raiffeisenweg 12 ist richtig! Danke!
PT-53 (2022-02-18 09:48:11+00:00): Danke für die Berichtigung.
Ich habe noch die Zufahrt vom Raiffeisenweg eingezeichnet.
Stefan Kuc (2022-02-18 09:59:26+00:00): Perfekt! Danke!
mavl (2022-05-20 15:34:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
PT-53 (2022-02-18 09:12:10+00:00): Hallo Herr Kuc,
Sie haben in Zell an diesem Nebengebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250318894/history
 neben dem Amenity-Merkmal für die Feuerwehr auch die Adresse mit der Haus-Nr. 2 eingetragen. 
Die Haus-Nr. 2 ist aber - gem. der amtlichen Karte Maps4BW - bereits an diesem Hauptgebäude eingetragen:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250318905/history

Jetzt gibt es in Zell 2x die Gebäude-Adresse Toreschle 2. Das sollte nicht sein.
Ich schlage vor die Feuerwehr-Daten vom Gebäude auf einen neuen separaten Knoten zu übertragen. Dann haben wir in OSM eine Gebäude-Adresse und eine (gleichlautende) POI-Adresse. Das wäre dann OSM-Wiki-Konform.

Machen Sie das oder soll ich das für Sie übernehmen?
Fragende Grüße
Stefan Kuc (2022-02-18 09:21:47+00:00): Oh, das übersteigt jetzt meine Fähigkeiten. Könnten Sie das übernehmen? Habe das alles heute zum ersten Mal gemacht!
PT-53 (2022-02-18 09:56:03+00:00): Kein Problem, ist erledigt.
Stefan Kuc (2022-02-18 09:59:42+00:00): Vielen Dank!
wireguy (2022-02-18 21:51:51+00:00): more broken relations
Lyman County
Tripp County

relation 1739832
relation 1425418
wireguy (2022-02-18 21:56:43+00:00): also Bennet County
relation 1425402

and others in area have role issues:
Okreek Segment
Ideal Segment
Rosebud Sioux Tribe
Horse Creek Segment
NFZANMNIM (2022-02-18 22:00:57+00:00): thank you for pointing these out. This area is what I'm currently working on. I'll address these soon.
It's a bit of an overwhelming area, with the existence of Checkerboard tribal lands, 2nd most complicated in the country.
parukhin (2022-08-12 22:44:28+00:00): Коллега, здравствуйте.  Подскажите,  а зачем это ограничение только направо (во двор под шлагбаум)? На я.зеркалах вижу только на перекрёстке южнее.
user_5359 (2022-02-20 16:29:40+00:00): Hallo! Ich habe mir mal erlaubt Deinen Tippfehler von description zu korrigieren.
Biosphärenreservat-Rhön (2022-02-21 07:41:46+00:00): Hallo! Danke!
griffonboi (2022-02-21 03:41:23+00:00): Hi, I noticed your last 3 changesets in this area have basically no description...

I would like to know why you reverted the road back to primary, I thought it would be fitting for a Trunk classification.
OddlyAngled (2022-02-19 16:35:07+00:00): We've been following the footpath=sidewalk, path=trail tagging practice here. Can you switch these back?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117549442
user_17724595 (2023-01-14 18:20:44+00:00): Why did you add a tag "test=1" to the buildings?
Omnific (2023-01-14 18:30:12+00:00): Couldn't say; it's been a year. Removed.
eggie (2022-02-18 10:10:24+00:00): JOSM geeft een foutmelding.
Als 'rol' kies je building?
Vraag het eens op het forum. Op de note staan ook nog aanwijzingen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Gr eggie
mapperaid (2022-03-08 10:48:20+00:00): Don't tag the whole region as a residential area. Moreover, this area is a duplicate of an existing admin boudary of Sokuluk region on this map, therefore this item should be deleted.
eggie (2022-02-18 10:05:14+00:00): Voor zo'n minibieb is een aparte tag.

Is het niet een dergelijke 'bieb" ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase

Gr eggie
jhnijman (2022-02-18 10:13:40+00:00): true. te makkelijk gekozen voor de optie die ID me voorschotelde. aangepast.
eggie (2022-02-18 10:20:31+00:00): 👍
orthocircular (2022-02-20 05:45:03+00:00): Looks good to me! Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117551203
wkdgs (2022-02-23 12:02:17+00:00): Hi,

ich glaube du hast aus Versehen den Tag "addr:street=service" hinzugefügt. Zumindest ergibt der für mich keinen Sinn.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117551448
Atari-Frosch (2022-02-23 12:14:51+00:00): Dann hab ich den Tag offenbar falsch verstanden, sorry.
eggie (2022-02-18 10:02:23+00:00): Dag jhnijmans...   Waar komt die tag vandaag.
 man_made=soccer_goal?
Er zijn ook kaarten die gewoon de belijning van een voetbalveld laten zien.
https://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=19&lat=51.98113&lon=5.67089&layers=B00000000FFFFFF

Denk niet dat er apart getekende goals op de kaart horen.
Gr eggie
jhnijman (2022-02-18 10:10:58+00:00): De betreffende losse goaltjes staan in een park zonder strak omlijnd speelveld. Het leek me dat zoiets, vergelijkbaar met een ander speeltoestel, ingetekend zou moeten (kunnen) worden? Losse goaltjes intekenen zou in dit geval beter passen bij de aangetroffen werkelijkheid dan een aangegeven speelveld.

Die tag vond ik hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=soccer?
eggie (2022-02-18 10:19:28+00:00): Oke... De tag zal niet veel voorkomen.
Gr eggie
mavl (2022-05-20 15:34:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
redd (2026-02-10 17:47:26+00:00): Hallo theophrastos,
danke dir für deine Erfassungen in Neuschleichach. 

Du hattest hier explizit nochmal die Bachstraße 29 erfasst, welche du ein paar Jahre zuvor auch am Skilift erfasst hattest (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37452880)

Weißt du, welche Gebäude die richtige Bachstraße 29 ist? Oder liegt hier eine Kollission vor? (darf eigentlich nicht vorkommen.. zumindest nicht so weit voneinander entfernt)

Grüße,

redd
theophrastos (2026-02-11 05:24:27+00:00): Hallo redd,
um sicher zu sein, müsste ich vor Ort nachschauen, die Erfassung ist einfach schon zu lange her. 

Beide Hausnummern sind ursprünglich übrigens nicht von mir eingetragen worden, daher glaube ich, dass ich die Hausnummer an der Skihhütte einfach nur übernommen habe. Beim Nachbarhaus zu 27 erinnere ich mich, eine Hausnummer bemerkt zu haben, von daher vermute ich, dass diese korrekt ist.

MfG 

Klaus
redd (2026-02-11 07:10:09+00:00): Klingt für mich Plausibel. Die Skihütte wurde vielleicht anhand der Webseite falsch nummeriert.

Habet daher die Adresse an der Skihütte mal entfernt. 

Grüße,

Redd
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-13 06:25:15+00:00): You used some incline=up/down tags - do you remember what you wanted to express with it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972053609/history
Mapping_95 (2022-10-13 08:31:46+00:00): Yes, the incline of the stairway.
ftcat (2022-02-18 10:00:57+00:00): Hi  TsangpoGorge,

I usually tag the whole width of the dry riverbed as a ford rather than a single point where the mapped stream/river crosses the way. These rivers will be dry and sandy for most the year and be prone to flash floods when it rains
ftcat (2022-02-18 10:03:03+00:00): see the ford wiki 
"On a way

The highway should share nodes with the riverbanks where it crosses them and also a node with the waterway=stream where they cross. Split the highway between the riverbanks and apply ford=yes to this segment (in addition to all other information pertaining to the highway).

If the approach (up and down to the riverbank) to the ford is much different from the ford itself, it might make sense to split the way and tag them appropriately. (incline=* might apply for example).

You should not tag ford=yes on the waterway node, when used on the highway way. "
TsangpoGorge (2022-02-22 11:15:22+00:00): Hello ftcat!

I made this change according to the OSM wiki. Under the ‘How to Map’ section, the first bullet point states to “use a single node ford where a highway crosses a waterway that is mapped as a linear stream without riverbanks”. How you usually tag fords is a more detailed method, but would also require the river banks to be mapped, according to the OSM Wiki.
ftcat (2022-02-22 12:39:12+00:00): I know technically that is correct but these rivers will change within the river bed from season to season and there is no actual nice constructed ford as shown in the accompanying image on the wiki just a point on the riverbank where you can get down to the river to cross so I felt tagging the way more accurately represents what is on the ground. Tagging the riverbanks is also not practical as that will make the river or more accurately the stream appear more substantial than it is. These waterways will be completely dry for more than 6 months of the year and may only have water in after it rains so even the idea of a ford is a bit ambiguous
TsangpoGorge (2022-02-23 13:03:17+00:00): Hello ftcat,

I can understand not mapping the riverbanks in this scenario. If you are confident there is no ford crossing infrastructure, and water may only impact the road after a seasonal heavy rain, what do you think of tagging the highway segment with flood_prone=yes instead of ford=yes, similar to first example on this wiki page: key:flood_prone. Alternatively, if the river/stream was modeled as a polygon up to the riverbanks, intermittent=yes could be used to better represent the size
ftcat (2022-02-23 15:37:50+00:00): Hi TsangpoGorge,

These streams are really ephemeral streams i.e. they will generally only flow after a heavy rainfall there is no tag in OSM for ephemeral rivers or streams, this does not mean that the riverbed is dry when the stream is not flowing, the bed is generally sandy and will be wet a few feet below the surface and getting stuck in sand is just as bad as in mud. I am almost 100% sure there will be no ford infrastructure, I have crossed many of these types of streams in Zambia. This particular stream appears to run within what we term a 'dambo' or seasonal wetland just after the crossing point where there may be no distinct stream bed. Being ephemeral they are prone to flash floods during really big storms that can change the river banks completely, although upstream this stream runs in a pretty well defined deep channel but follow it down stream to where it meets the Lupande River and then switch between Bing and Maxar imagery to see how the river bank has been eaten away by some particularly heavy floods. I do not think the tag flood_prone=yes applies to this situation in the way the tag is intended, it is more for rivers that may burst their banks after heavy rains on a regular basis. These streams and rivers will run violently for a short time, they may not burst their banks because their banks have been eaten away over time to accommodate the floods.
TsangpoGorge (2022-02-24 16:22:16+00:00): Thank you for sharing your knowledge of the area! 

The OSM Wiki’s (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flood_prone) definition of flood_prone as "mostly applicable to roads that go under water after heavy rains” seems to fit your scenario very well.

I appreciate your attention to detail here and thank you for your consideration.
Mammi71 (2022-09-28 09:02:36+00:00): Hallo staytuned,
Du hast in diesem CS den Adler "umgebaut". Ich meine, das ist nicht so gut gewesen:
1. nur bei baulicher Trennung getrennt mappen lässt sich in großen Kreuzungen nicht konsequent durchziehen. Auf Grund der nun deutlichen Winkel im Kreuzungspunkt, die dadurch entstehen, fangen manche Router an, Abbiegeanweisungen zu geben, wo keine sind.
2. einem Stück Antonienstraße fehlt das oneway=yes
3. die Abbiegebeschränkungen fehlen seit dem am Kreuzungspunkt komplett (den way/node wo sie dran war, hast Du wahrscheinlich gelöscht), es wird dadurch falsch geroutet (von Westen und von Süden kommend sind keine Linksabbieger erlaubt)
Mammi71 (2022-09-28 09:07:08+00:00): PS: aktuell kann man wahrscheinlich noch die Beendigung der Baumaßnahme bsi Mitte November abwarten. Erstaunlich, dass zwar der Baustellenbereich gemappt wurde aber trotz der langen Vollsperrung niemand die ways auf construction gesetzt hat.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-26 04:36:18+00:00): You used some incline=up/down tags - do you remember what you wanted to express with it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971527611/history
Mapping_95 (2022-09-26 04:46:44+00:00): Stairs for the underpass, change of level.
Supaplex (2022-02-18 11:41:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032830940
有畫建築的話，不用加比較簡略標示的點
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117553143
Michael712 (2022-03-02 20:42:39+00:00): Hi reigi,

ich glaube bei deiner Änderung ist etwas schief gelaufen. 
Zumindest hast du highway=path an einen node gesetzt, was so vermutlich nicht gedacht war:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1433416532
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1433416532


Viele Grüße
Michael
reigi (2022-03-03 06:10:07+00:00): Hallo Michael,

da hast du vollkommen recht. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. 
Ich wollte eigentlich nur das Verkehrszeichen am node taggen und habe das mit dem Verkehrszeichen-Tool in josm getan. Das gibt ja einige Tags (u.a. highway=path) vor. Und die habe ich versehentlich nicht an die nodes angepasst. 
Danke nochmal.
user_5359 (2022-02-19 19:37:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Please also pay attention to the correct spelling
mavl (2022-05-20 15:34:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:34:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:34:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
lovelyfurball88 (2022-02-18 11:56:21+00:00): Why did you delete paths and woodland?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117555302
ZeLonewolf (2022-02-18 12:59:47+00:00): Hi, can you explain why you deleted this patch of wood?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526651029

This was a validly mapped wooded area.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-18 18:15:25+00:00): Not to the quality that is need for the future. I am remapping all features. This will all be done tonight.  30 -35hrs of updates on this course.   I start at 8pm pacific. I stream all my work online.  Open game devs. I’ll be done tonight
Metasoft™ (2022-02-18 18:16:04+00:00): Www.twitch.tv/filmgrip
Metasoft™ (2022-02-18 18:16:39+00:00): All my edits were stream here last night.
ZeLonewolf (2022-02-18 18:40:58+00:00): That's not really an acceptable response.  If you are going to replace a feature, you need to do it in one changeset.  Now that you've deleted that patch of woods, it's missing from the map with only the promise of adding it back in the future.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-19 15:01:54+00:00): I’m unsure how you can discount my 39 hours of map improvements.  This is WIP.  I’m not a mapper I’m a business and I need to be able to work.   The less quality splines are in the way of my quality work.  How can we go forward.  Can you help me find a solution so I stop getting messages like this and can focus of very detailed mapping to line height data to from lidar.   It needs to be twice as accurate but I’m only allowed 2000 points per spline. It’s importance on open street map is to share so other game makers without structure don’t mess up your map. It’s done once.  Can you help me find a solution?
Metasoft™ (2022-02-19 15:05:37+00:00): Please do not revert.  Before we talk please.  I worked so hard on this and I have so much more to do
Metasoft™ (2022-02-19 15:07:24+00:00): I need to look after my family tonight.  I will work all day to fix and never delete something without replacing it until we can find an acceptable solution.  Cool?
snoozingnewt (2022-02-19 16:58:55+00:00): OSM has a wiki with general community preferences, and you've violated several of them. When you join a community, do you not read the rules and jump right in - especially in a site that has real-world consequences. The resolution on the bodies of water and other objects is considered unacceptable for OSM for several reasons - the iD editor should give warnings when you break them.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-19 18:06:05+00:00): Please don't "delete everything and remap" - it is far too easy to forget something.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 04:16:26+00:00): ok I will adjust and not do this work osm any more I will fix my changes.  sorry for the trouble.   lidar requires the resolution.  I will have to do this work in an offline program.   again, I am the owner of the solar mountain games, truly sorry
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 04:25:11+00:00): the thing is this is a missed opportunity for open street map.  and someone else will take this resolution. i wanted to give it away for free to build the metaverse faster.   there is no better platform.  why would they not want the best, i dont understand?   


Thanks for reading this.   I truly wish this was  the internationl tool for building the real metaverse build by game devs, not nft scammers.


much love,

Brad
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 04:30:39+00:00): out of final curiosity what is max allowed points per saved asset? I could do some lidar test with that spline count.  might save me from cloud compare.  I really want to share highest approved count quality.  i thought that number was 2000 as some bodies of water are large and the early warning is a save your work warning.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 04:34:00+00:00): and for future knowledge, is there software that saves out osm file on a esri overlay. this is what the offline lidar calibration tool requires.  

Cheers


Thank you.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 04:46:23+00:00): This is what all lidar courses should look like, not coming from arrogance, or ego,  just experince,  9 credits on EA PGA Tiger woods.   this is alpha footage

meadow gardens. pit meadows

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l7xvt9KC2A&t=1s

all uploaded for free
next is race tracks, but not on OSM.
i now know. OSM does not welcome this quality. I get it, its heavy,  they are all 35-40 hrs of points per 18 holes.  that + lag= less experience.   for me id rather push for a faster server than refuse quality.  not advice just a random thought.  thanks again.
snoozingnewt (2022-02-20 13:31:11+00:00): First of all-

It’s not just you! We have quite a few experiences with people from the metaverse vandalizing the map, so the general sentiment is against the metaverse. OSM is primarily used as a map of the real world and had existed for decades, and it is not in existence primarily to add gaming data. You can still add it, but it needs to follow the rules the rest of the world does.

Adding many nodes doesn’t increase quality significantly. However, it adds a lot of data to the map. The servers can handle it, but there are several reasons why it is still bad- 

1.  If you shape of the lake is updated in the future, it would be a huge pain to change it.

2. There’s no real-world reason to do so, at least until now. Maybe the game likes the level of detail, but the community doesn’t, and OSM is almost entirely built off of community consensus.

3. Some people use an editor (like iD) to edit the map, and they download an area to edit. Places with a ton of detail make it harder for those people to edit, because they have to load ridiculously small areas near complicated places, like this golf course.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 18:49:15+00:00): last time i messed up as a brand new user i got a one year ban, and 46 ish hours of work deleted I begged to get, back. nope.... let it go.  filled out the forms as a corporta user for my contractor and I
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 19:01:04+00:00): we have added to our training all  new info you provided us.
 do you want my blood... lol?  I have a world to build not just golf.  this is the one I can show and demo, as it payable...  This is the beginning.  race tracks are next for us.... all of them.

galf courses.... all of them where data lives, where is doesnt we send  out a team to lidar scan.   

youtuber gave this tech to kids. that is your problem I am just learning ,  difernce i lead with kindness and mercy, rather that mistrust and ban hammer.    Order vs Chaos,  I have to make some chaos to make order.  the cart paths were splines on the fairway in some places.   but now that you call someone you dont even know,  a vandal, someone who happens to have severe ptsd for bullies and crime.  I am NOT an vandal criminal.   please dont assume that is ok to say if there is a  time please.  thanks
SomeoneElse (2022-02-20 19:03:24+00:00): @Solar%20Mountain%20Games , it might be worth looking at "JOSM" as an editor.  There a few things built into that that you might find useful - one is the ability to "simplyfy ways" (which keeping essentially the same shape).
Some of the nodes around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032593797 are only 20cm apart - that's not "more accurate" (since we don't have access to imagery that accurate) it's just "more detailed".  Before anyone else does anything with it they're going to have to reduce the number of nodes to a more sensible number, one that reasonably matches what you can infer from the imagery.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 19:06:47+00:00): metaverse not game... games are in metaverses I say plural as there will be many there arready area. this mapping makes all maps look better.  so many souced pull data form here
snoozingnewt (2022-02-20 19:11:21+00:00): We understand you need to make money, but there are also rules… we’re judging you for not taking the time to look at them even after several people complained. You aren’t entitled to break them.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-20 19:12:52+00:00): Re "is there software that saves out osm file on a esri overlay. this is what the offline lidar calibration tool requires. ", someone on IRC suggests "ogr2ogr", see  https://gdal.org/drivers/vector/osm.html , but that's very much "it might work" rather than "yes it will and its easy".
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 19:16:22+00:00): i can see my edits on earth2.io  metaverse alpha candidate.  the whole world gets professional Quality if I map the course, why would a company turn down thousand of hours of free help to trained professionals who a regiters as  a company to be here.  doing this work.  I cant stay up for 30-70 hrs, cuz that is a standt to PGA feature map.   y'all threw it away like trash.   My professional , new to your tool and process, insult first system does not jive, i must be missing something , glaring, I have my blind spots too.   Im srtuck my life savings is invested on a tool that stops me from working ever 2 weeks and deletes my data when I thought they were here to protect it.
snoozingnewt (2022-02-20 19:20:23+00:00): You’re missing something glaring
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 19:27:08+00:00): how can i work with my international contrators with an offline tool, if we have a delaine like in abu Dhabi .  earth 2 is updated for osm data too.   we Own 40 Proerties there where we advertise of metverse content so it has to be here
ill work with your ED on this, thanks for all your help gang.   we will get this licked.  we just have not found the right one yet, keep those ideas flowing.  and keep talking.  ;-) just please don't delete the is for a Happy Gilmore Pitch for 2K its the course from the movie. this one is extra special.