piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
multimodaal (2022-06-11 18:06:10+00:00): Hoi, ben je al langsgeweest bij de Trambaan? 
Toen ik er vorige week langskwam was de weg waar het fietsnetwerk overeen liep nog steeds een G11-fietspad (-; 
Groeten!
multimodaal (2022-07-03 12:51:36+00:00): Hoi, het fietspad staat nog steeds als rijbaan ingetekend, wil je het nog herstellen ? Veel dank alvast!
FM2441 (2022-07-05 18:44:14+00:00): Vandaag even een gaatje game en er langs gereden. Met is er nog volop aan het werk, maar ik heb het zo goed mogelijk proberen te verwerken.

M.v.g.
multimodaal (2022-07-06 10:52:16+00:00): Top, dankjewel!
zstadler (2022-05-29 08:02:33+00:00): Hello Jobigutenburg,

In this edit you have modified the admin  level of the historic 1949 Israel-Syria border.

For many years, these are not the facts on the ground. Please avoid making such edits.

This part of your edit was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121643546
mavl (2022-06-10 15:51:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122217199 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6055].
mavl (2022-06-10 15:51:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122217199 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6055].
Eifelkobold! (2022-05-30 22:29:01+00:00): Hi, die Strecke Bitburg-Erdorf - Kyllburg ist leider weiterhin nicht in Betrieb. Ich habe deine Änderungen diesbezüglich in Änderungssatz 121740335 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121740335) zurückgesetzt, die Gleiskosmetik und weitere Änderungen aber belassen.

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
CjMalone (2024-04-16 12:28:38+00:00): This one seems weird to me. shop=laundry amenity=vending_machine,vending=laundry
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-16 15:07:26+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150089833
Allison P (2022-05-29 03:17:41+00:00): Individual sections of parking lots should not be mapped as amenity=parking. You can map individual spaces, but the lot as a whole is already there.
Janjko (2022-11-10 13:55:31+00:00): Rasprava i glasanje o prijevodima imena ulica u name:en=* tagu ovdje:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/prijevodi-imena-ulica/5246

Ako imaš prijedlog zašto da ostanu, javi nam tamo.
Rainero (2022-05-28 22:30:30+00:00): Korrektur CS-Kommentar: operator Kleidercontainer
user4816003805 (2022-06-26 07:21:20+00:00): Hi LetsContribute,

Welcome to OSM!
Just FYI, the address for the node you added (https://osm.org/node/9777806400) is in the wrong format.
See e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:street.

You probably want to tag it as:
addr:housenumber=1300
addr:street=Evans Avenue
addr:unit=Suite 30

OsmAnd doesn't have a place to put the Suite number, so you'd have to use the "Advanced" tab if you wanted to add that information.
gscscnd (2022-05-28 21:09:58+00:00): Część highway=footway będąca przejściem dla pieszych zazwyczaj powinna być oznaczona footway=crossing, a nie footway=sidewalk.
kam114 (2022-05-28 22:13:05+00:00): Cześć, dziękuję za informację, przejścia już poprawione
gscscnd (2022-05-28 21:11:05+00:00): Czy to nie jest ta sama droga dla rowerów, która jest opisana tagami cycleway* na drodze <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42742326>?
Interswd (2022-06-02 11:36:39+00:00): możliwe. Ostatnio ją jednak jakby wydzielili i zmienili oznakowanie nieco.
gscscnd (2022-06-02 12:17:44+00:00): Chodzi o to, żeby nie oznaczać jednej drogi na dwa sposoby. Jeśli to ta sama, to jeden sposób byłby do skasowania.
Interswd (2022-06-03 07:20:48+00:00): ok
sektov (2022-05-28 20:54:58+00:00): Somebody has to be so small-minded to ask you for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ;)
sektov (2022-05-28 20:51:54+00:00): Please throw some https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2022-05-28 21:35:23+00:00): Dag vvad.. Alleen dat bod was verbonden middels een node met het pad.. dus dat ging vrolijk mee.
Eigenlijk zijn dit geen bossen. 
Wat mij betreft kunnen die opgeplakte bossen van mapper P gewoon weg en vervangen worden door aparte bomen op nodes
natural=tree

Doe je het zelf?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121632356

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-28 21:35:44+00:00): bod typo >> bos
eggie (2022-05-29 05:39:37+00:00): Bos verwijderd
Cartographer10 (2022-05-29 12:03:50+00:00): Hello Ygramul,

Can you split changeset like these the next time? Now half of the European and African users see you changeset where you only changed  things in the UK and Africa. Just upload these changes in two changesets.

Thanks in advance.
Ygramul (2022-05-29 12:17:42+00:00): Yes, I usually do. This was an unintentional mistake. If you take a look through my history I tend to take pains to keep the changeset bounds small (things like these typically remain confined to a single object or a few hundred meters at most).
Cartographer10 (2022-05-29 12:23:05+00:00): Your right, I see now, sorry.  Thanks for the reply.
DUGA (2022-09-11 04:08:14+00:00): What is the point mapping this?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9777869152#map=19/39.33181/-76.64285
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-10-13 21:44:35+00:00): Hi, sorry I missed your comment earlier. User ElliottPlack pointed out that I missed some details in tagging rail crossings before, and I used his MapRoullette task for updating crossing data to fix the mistakes I made.

When I was tagging crossings before, I was surveying on foot. There are signs and barriers which are present which are not obvious to see on foot but can be seen more easily from the road. So tagging the warning sign locations is helpful for reference to know where the crossing details are visible from.

I also am just interested in cataloguing the types of road signs (and their codes) used in the city. Maryland only keeps a complete inventory outside of the city, so in the city we can only collect this data by survey. For crossings in particular, this is actually a detail which the state makes note of the warning sign code if they know it in this table: https://data-maryland.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/maryland::mdot-railroad-crossing-inventory-view-2/explore (so would be useful to compare)
user_5359 (2022-05-30 17:10:33+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333713917. What is the meqaning of the tag old:bridge:name = Ponte Colombo Salles? Dd you mean bridge:old_name?
gscscnd (2022-05-29 07:40:29+00:00): Jest zakaz wstępu konno czy trasa jest zbyt trudna? W tym drugim przypadku nie horse=no, tylko <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:horse_scale>.
eggie (2022-08-15 21:17:59+00:00): Please don't tag temporarely events in OSM. 
Why place of worship?

Greetz,
eggie
user_2066394 (2022-05-31 17:29:14+00:00): Den Umriss kann man nicht weiterverwenden?
schoka (2022-05-31 21:03:11+00:00): Der Platz war nicht als Fläche sondern als Linie eingezeichnet. Deshalb habe ich den Jahnplatz neu eingezeichnet.
user_2066394 (2022-06-01 15:08:04+00:00): Sind/waren das nicht beides sinngemäß Flächen?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121633449&relations=true
schoka (2022-06-01 19:58:49+00:00): Sieht rückblickend tatsächlich so aus. In ID wurde es mir aber nicht als Fläche angezeigt, sonst hätte ich ich es nicht gelöscht und neu eingetragen.
bxl-forever (2022-05-29 21:04:17+00:00): I see a speed cushion in one direction (traffic_calming=cushion + direction=backward) but no traffic island.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=284821247065059

Has the situation changed since this picture?
Thierry1030 (2022-05-30 08:32:19+00:00): sitatuation has changed indeed! still need to make new pictures ... I pass by there regularly
Thierry1030 (2022-05-30 09:31:45+00:00): sitatuation has changed indeed! still need to make new pictures ... I pass by there regularly
@Aurelian (2022-05-30 05:51:24+00:00): #GlobalYouthmappers
#Youthmappersuniversityofjoschapter
@Aurelian (2022-05-30 05:50:47+00:00): #GlobalYouthmappers
#Youthmappersuniversityofjoschapter
@Aurelian (2022-05-30 05:50:21+00:00): #GlobalYouthmappers
#Youthmappersuniversityofjoschapter
@Aurelian (2022-05-30 05:49:39+00:00): #GlobalYouthmappers
#Youthmappersuniversityofjoschapter
eggie (2022-05-29 04:44:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Alle gebouwen zijn import vanuit het Kadaster. Beter niets aan veranderen.
Niet naar de daken kijken. Daar staat het gebouw niet.
Svp geen adressen toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrek. .. er zijn al adresnodes.
.. shelters zijn schuilplekken voor slecht weer voor wandelaars en fietsers. Dat zal hier niet het geval zijn. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-29 04:53:32+00:00): De oneigenlijke tagging heb ik verwijderd. Wanneer iets niet klopt graag een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster. Dat kan hier
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Verlengde%20Zandweg%201a&resultOffset=0&objectId=0373200000001892&geometry.x=105665.83&geometry.y=515952.22200042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0373010000001892

Even op het potloodje klikken.
MVG
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-29 10:24:59+00:00): Can you explain what you did in the changeset comments?  Putting "." does not provide info on what was done or why.
sektov (2022-05-28 22:40:49+00:00): You mean solar?
VictorIE (2022-05-29 07:06:12+00:00): Solar power is mapped as power=generator, so power. :)
VictorIE (2022-05-30 06:31:53+00:00): Hi again. Just for clarity, the solar panels I was updating are solar-electric, not solar-thermal.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-29 07:12:00+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas. Prašome negadinti duomenų, jei neturite jokio supračiaus, ką darote. Slava Ukrainskai nacii i pizdec rasejskoj pederacii.
Zverik (2022-05-29 11:55:19+00:00): Tomas, isn't it time for you to retire? You're taking the map too close to the heart, and this incident highlights what you've been doing for the past at least 7 years — driving mappers and newcomers away with your harsh words and rigid mapping practices.
TrickyFoxy (2022-05-29 13:19:30+00:00): 👋 Tomas.
First of all, I am sad that you greet guests like this. But I will not answer the same and I will skip it 🙈

Now I will explain why such edits occur periodically.

There is a validator of the road graph https://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-OVRV/routing-map which periodically does not accurately highlight borders and shows errors in other countries. And mappers like me (accidentally) try to fix mistakes in neighboring countries as well. (don't swear at them:)

I'm not trying to insist on the road tagging scheme adopted in Russia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Most likely you don't know about it, but at my cursory glance at the map, it is very similar to the one used in Lithuania.
In one of the comments you wrote "Please do not edit without learning local guidelines." Can you give a link to them?

In short, what the mappers are trying to fix. According to our scheme, roads should be connected to roads of the same level or higher. For example, in this edit, the bridge is of the secondary type, but it is not connected to other secondary or trunk/motorway. This is a fairly intuitive approach, so often it's not even mapping according to the scheme.

While I have no information about the local scheme, the question is: why is it so important that the roads are designated as secondary? Would you like to get a linked road by road type? The validator, by the way, is also available for Lithuania
peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/LT-OVRV/routing-map 😏

If there is a good reason for such a type assignment, then tell / give a link (it's even interesting:)
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-29 13:28:58+00:00): Ilja, don't tell people what to do and they will not tell you where to go.

I know about peirce.gis-lab.info, I've even checked it some 10-12 years ago, but it's rules appeared pointless/incorrect in some places so they are not used in Lithuania. Lithuanian tagging rules regarding roads are here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lithuania
SomeoneElse (2022-05-29 21:57:32+00:00): @Tomas Straupis - https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/136939797 has been tertiary forever, but you seem to be insisting that this bridge is secondary.  Can you explain why?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-30 05:46:55+00:00): Your map does not work (at least for me, at least at this moment), Andy. The reason for such classification is in Lithuanian road tagging rules agreed many years ago. We even have an automated QA rule for this, so this way could not have been tertiary "for ever" ;-)
SomeoneElse (2022-05-30 09:33:25+00:00): > Your map does not work
Sorry - that was my fault, telling someone to look at something on a server and then doing some maintenance on that server :)
Try https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/136939797 , or even https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136939797/history , and compare with https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/377193119 .
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-30 09:38:38+00:00): I'm not sure what do you expect me to see there... Automated QA rule for this is online for at least 10 years. This means no way in Lithuania can be tertiary and paved outside of major cities. And that is what I'm seeing in the history. Bridge and some parts of the road close to it is paved, road further away is not paved yet. This also reflects official Lithuanian data which we're using to synchronise/check.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-30 10:14:30+00:00): So you're saying that you're using the "highway=secondary" key to indicate "surface=paved"?  That is simply wrong.
As written, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lithuania#Roads_outside_of_cities isn't necessarily a problem provided that the person following that rule uses their brain - while tertiary roads outside cities may be generally unpaved, there will _always_ be exceptions and edge cases, apply that as a hard rule is just silly.
That line was introduced to the wiki in 2010: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Lithuania&direction=next&oldid=488532 .  When things change (for example, more people will be mapping surface keys now) rules should reflect that.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-30 10:39:18+00:00): This was a well discussed decision on how to map OSM highway classes to Lithuanian road classes. OSM is an information system which does not stand alone, it is integrated with other systems/datasets. Community/crowdsource is just one input ("input" - does not necessarily mean data). We used our brains for higher level strategic decisions, not for pin-point local technical imaginary "problems".
SomeoneElse (2022-05-30 10:49:55+00:00): >  We used our brains for higher level strategic decisions, not for pin-point local technical imaginary "problems".

Exactly - and anyone using their brain here would say that a bridge on a tertiary road clearly should be tertiary.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-30 10:58:38+00:00): While I do not have any obligation to explain our decision, I anyway did that. But looks like you, Andy, fail to rise from the coders level and therefore fail to understand the reasons why we did what we did. Therefore I see further explanations here as futile. However I'm open to explaining it anyway but on a different forum - you can mail me if you want, provided you are going to actually listen and not simply waste my time.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-01 16:36:48+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121819774 .  I've followed both how things look from various imagery sources and followed a reasonable interpretation of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lithuania#Roads_outside_of_cities .
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-01 19:51:27+00:00): Andy Allan, this was a collective documented decision by Lithuanian mapping community which you are NOT part of. You have never been on the spot or in the region. You've never been in touch with Lithuanian mapping community. Lithuanian mapping community has NEVER had any conflicts about this rule. It is not up to you to make decisions for local community. It is a shame that people like you are allowed to do damage in the name of as I can see useless "DWG".
SomeoneElse (2022-06-01 20:07:48+00:00): There are too many people called Andy in this project :)
I'm not Andy Allan - I wouldn't know where to start with code contributions to the OSM website.
Obviously, if anyone from the Lithuanian community (in addition to Tomas) wants to explain the general interpretation here that would be most welcome.
However, with a DWG hat on, sometimes we need to adjudicate between different OSM communities (for example, what a region of a country thinks vs what the rest of the country thinks).  We try and be reasonable, and try and make decisions based on common sense.
Many countries have some examples of anachronistic road classidication (the Oxford High Street in England is one example, another is a "lost" road in Russia that lead to a long forum thread, another was a similar example in the mountains of Ukraine last year).
I believe I've taken a common-sense approach to interpreting something that was written in 2010 - and also my edit extended the "asphalt" section to match the imagery (although I do appreciate that sometimes that might be out of date, after a harsh winter).
Zverik (2022-06-01 20:09:49+00:00): Anybody who has tried mapping in Lithuania knows the "Lithuanian mapping community" is one person.
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-01 20:33:35+00:00): Ilja, you haven't been here, you haven't been in any of our meetings, you haven't attended any of OSM presentations in Lithuanian conferences or lectures in Vilnius University, you haven't talked with anybody doing university practice work for OSM. So you have no knowledge and yet try to claim something. I can therefore only advice you to follow your ship ;-)

Summing up, there are automated QA rules which work according to LOCAL decisions, and all changes and tagging will abide LOCAL rules, not anybody from foreign countries. Surfaces are checked locally and/or verified against open government data.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-29 07:13:27+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas.
JesseFTW (2022-05-31 02:22:29+00:00): Where did you find this MapRoulette task, and how did you make this changeset without using a normal editor (like JOSM, or iD, etc.)?
SomeoneElse (2022-05-29 00:45:06+00:00): Also 28/05 - 29/05
Suornode (2022-05-31 05:59:20+00:00): Esta vía aún existe
A que se debe su elminicación?
AlexBlasio (2022-05-31 06:07:55+00:00): Buenas noches, no lo eliminé, lo convertí en vías abandonadas, ya que lleva más de 20 años ese tramo sin usarse. El tramo que no convertí en abandonado es el que se tiene para la construccción del tren ligero.
eggie (2022-05-29 04:55:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
trial (2026-02-18 12:11:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9778334502 could be a racon (seeing it on https://www.irishlights.ie/media/16363/Skelligs-4-_MainImage.jpg), but the lighthouse doesn't seem equipped with a racon (I found racon on other places in Ireland but not there).
A small light for an alignment may be to avoid Washerwoman Rock? https://eoceanic.com/sailing/harbours/102/great_skellig_%28skellig_michael%29
Just an idea.
JessAk71 (2022-06-06 17:46:39+00:00): Hi tbo47! Thanks for updating pois that are no longer open. Just a quick question, for cases where some of the poi attributes are still valid such as in this case the address for this now empty restaurant, it would be helpful to leave the tags on the poi that are still relevant and just remove the ones that are no longer relevant instead of deleting the whole thing. So here you could keep all the address tags and even the amenity tag and set it to disused:amenity=restaurant. This also helps keep the history of this location intact. what do you think?
tbo47 (2022-06-06 17:57:03+00:00): Hi JessAk71. Thanks for your nice and long message. You are 100% right.

I contribute mostly with OsmAnd when I'm walking around. I went to quickly.
eggie (2022-05-29 06:59:23+00:00): Hi Ronald.. I don't think this is correct.
Duplicated tagging of a road.

Your edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121637427

I will fix it.
Greetz,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
user_5359 (2022-05-30 17:46:55+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on http://www.osm.org/node/9778562617. What is the meaning of the tag route red = 960? Did you mean route_ref = 960?
Sam Wilson (2022-05-30 23:35:13+00:00): Oops, yes! I was hurrying because the bus was coming. I'll fix it up…
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
ftcat (2022-05-30 07:39:32+00:00): While GMAs are protected areas in Zambia they are not of the same category as a National Park, they are a buffer area around the park and controlled hunting is allowed, professional hunting in particular. GMAs are IUCN Management Category VI i.e protect-class 6 not 2
ftcat (2022-05-30 07:56:05+00:00): Please do not use roads as part of multipolygons, while the road may be used as a boundary for protected areas in Zambia the actual boundary is usually gazetted as the road reserve to one side of the road not the actual road itself. If the road is re routed the boundary may not follow the new route
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2023-01-11 04:20:48+00:00): Hallo A Keep,
Terima kasih karena telah berkontribusi menambahkan data di OSM!
Saat ini saya sedang melakukan remote mapping untuk validasi jaringan kereta api yang ada di Indonesia.
Saya membutuhkan bantuan anda terutama untuk rel kereta api ini (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1063867783)

Saya melihat pada history osm bahwa anda menambahkan tag "Layer=2" pada rel kereta api ini (-7.2088042, 107.8975618). Apakah anda mengetahui bahwa rel kereta api tersebut berada pada lapisan yang berbeda dengan jalan disekitarnya? atau adakah informasi lain yang bisa anda jelaskan?

Saya sangat mengapresiasi apapun informasi yang anda berikan.
Terima kasih
A Keep (2023-01-13 06:25:58+00:00): maaf baru saya balas, saya coba ubah layer rel kereta apinya karena jika saya keep di layer 1, nanti osm bakal ngasih warning conflict sama jalan raya terus, soalnya relnya emang berada di pinggir jalan raya persis
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2023-01-16 02:13:25+00:00): Oke, terima kasih banyak infonya. Infonya sangat membantu saya untuk memperbaiki warning crossing highway/railway. Happy mapping!
user_5359 (2022-05-30 15:57:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1062244879. What is the meaning of the tag dysty_date = 2022-05-29?
LockOnGuy (2022-05-31 21:54:31+00:00): This changeset had been reverted fully or in part in changeset 121786223 where the changeset comment was "Revert vandalism in changeset 121639845 restore the disputed areas in the Arabian Gulf region"
skadi (2026-05-12 19:29:51+00:00): а куда проезд делся? это не нормально -- делать дыру в улице
zyxzyx (2022-06-24 13:12:32+00:00): この way 形状の編集により、なぜ西方向へ約 10 m ずらした（誤差を加えた）のでしょうか？
user_15661662 (2022-06-24 22:43:33+00:00): 誰かがBingの航空地図に続いて何年も前にこのエラーを犯しました、私は修正します
literan (2022-05-29 20:10:04+00:00): это не название
Filip009 (2022-06-03 17:27:24+00:00): Dobrý deň, dávate si prosím pozor na spájanie cesty a hranice. Najlepšie ako sa tomu vyvarovať je skryť hranicu. Pri editovaní v pravej časti je "mapové údaje" (klávesová skratka "U"). Potom rozkliknúť mapové objekty a kliknúť na hranice, tak aby tam políčko nebolo zaškrtnuté.