piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ifhas (2020-10-08 06:27:20+00:00): Hello,

Are You sure the location of the Ameer Peer dargah you drawn is accurate? 

Regards,
ifhas.
keithonearth (2018-01-03 21:06:59+00:00): I've left a couple of small sections as cycleways, as they have been widened with the recent road work, and have shared pedestrian/cyclist markings. The sections marked as sidewalks are so narrow that a cyclist cannot pass another cyclist or a pedestrian w/o one of them coming to a stop.
vitoplus (2018-01-03 08:27:46+00:00): Errore, Alta Valsugana!
eggie (2018-01-03 09:46:23+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2018-01-03 10:00:42+00:00): Dat kleine stukje Romeinenstraat dat je hebt toegevoegd moet nog wel een naam hebben.
Bij het Ripperdapark heb je iets verwijderd... daar kijk ik even naar.
MrtnB (2018-01-03 10:03:27+00:00): Oh, ja, dat toegevoegde stukje zal ik eens proberen een naam te geven. Het Ripperdapark bestaat daar helemaal niet, het Dietsveld is een plantsoen met speelplaats, geen park. Verderop in Haarlem is wel het Ripperdapark. Ik weet echt niet waarom het daar staat.
eggie (2018-01-03 10:09:52+00:00): Oke... bedankt voor je reactie. Ik heb dat stukje groen wel losgemaakt van dat wandelpad. Let svp op dat plakken. 
Over parken is op het moment veel te doen. Het is nu goed getagd. 
Dus gewoon als landuse = grass. Evt lossen bomen toevoegen. natural=tree
Leisure park wordt alleen gebruikt als een losse overkoepeling dat de functie aangeeft over alles heen en dan nog bij grote parken met naam.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
Niet elk stukje groen is dus een park.
MrtnB (2018-01-03 10:14:37+00:00): Oke, dat plakken heb ik niet gezien, zal er op letten.

Bij echte parken is er dus een overlappende 'structuur'? Goed om te weten.

En inderdaad, er zullen sinds een maand wel heel veel 'parken' bij zijn gekomen. Dat is niet de bedoeling...
eggie (2018-01-03 10:32:27+00:00): Precies... het rampscenario heet Pokemon. Parkedits liggen dus onder een vergrootglas. :)
Schroom niet iets te vragen... Dat kan ook op het forum van OSM. Inlog identiek aan OSM account.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MrtnB (2018-01-03 10:56:12+00:00): Ach ja, ik doe dit ook vanwege Pokemon GO, maar vooral omdat ik me stoor aan slordigheidjes in de kaart. 

Ik zie verder dat er veel variatie zit in het aanduiden van groen in deze (mijn) buurt, grass, forest, meadow, etc. Is er ergens een handleiding hiervoor?

Als ik nog een vraag heb zal ik ook even zoeken op het forum.
eggie (2018-01-03 11:16:19+00:00): De wiki is de leidraad. Voor de rest is het een kwestie van gewoon doen en veel vragen. Je kunt bij opslaan het vakje aanvinken met het verzoek: : “Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt”.
Het Simon vestdijkpark heb ik net van wat landuse voorzien, maar dat kan vast beter aks je lokale mapper bent. De cover leisure=park heb ik ongemoeid gelaten. Rendering zal wel even duren.
Over de soorten "grass" is ook een draadje. In de bebouwde kom gewoon landuse=grass. 
Losse bomen als natural=tree. Stukje "bos" als landuse = forest.. losse bomen op nodes natural=tree; op een "way" natural=tree_row.
eggie (2018-01-03 11:19:55+00:00): Hier wat leesvoer over grass en grass https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58453
MrtnB (2018-01-03 11:25:46+00:00): Ik ga het later even rustig doorlezen. Ik zie in ieder geval veel bermen langs/tussen de weg hier die staan op 'meadow'. Dat klopt in ieder geval niet.
vitoplus (2018-01-03 08:27:31+00:00): Errore, Alta Valsugana!
manog_nya (2019-05-03 01:08:03+00:00): "Hi  aglisdwininta,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 243921864
way 243921853
way 243921851" classified as 'Unclassified'. However these roads are not supported by any of the imagery.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
aglisdwininta (2019-05-03 01:52:18+00:00): i have deleted some road that are not necessary and changed the road classification as track
Alecs01 (2018-01-04 14:41:36+00:00): Reverted; please don't add personal data to the map, thanks
PlaneMad (2018-07-02 03:29:16+00:00): Thank you for your contributions, but there were some mistakes that you need to fix in your edits. 

You had crossed some overlapping highways by dragging them around which ive fixed :)

Please see http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ if you need on contributing to the map. Hope to see you building a better map of your area soon!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55122558
Y_Suzuki (2018-01-03 09:12:06+00:00): ありがとうございます。確認します。
user_5359 (2018-01-03 13:29:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the wall. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
R0bst3r (2018-01-03 11:01:25+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55123022
pbUJb (2018-04-15 13:31:18+00:00): Не нужно рисовать все сараи в частных домах, это засоряет карту. И делайте выравнивание углов через контекстное меню.
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-01-03 09:34:12+00:00): Changeset involves various edits (see following comments)
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-01-03 09:35:18+00:00): [Batangas City and Taysan, Batangas] add stops for Batangas-Dagatan jeepney route
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-01-03 09:37:24+00:00): [Pasay, Makati, Mandaluyong, and Quezon City] add terminal of Airport Loop service at NAIA Terminal 3, rename MMDA-designated bus stops along Roxas Boulevard and EDSA.
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-01-03 09:39:23+00:00): [Ermita, Quiapo, and Sampaloc, Manila, and Santa Mesa Heights, Quezon City] add bus and jeepney stops, and add Jollibee branch on the renovated Quinta Market
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-01-03 09:40:12+00:00): [Quezon City] rename bus/PUJ stops along Quezon Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-01-03 09:40:51+00:00): [Alabang] add new POIs on the vicinity of Alabang Viaduct
highflyer74 (2018-01-03 12:15:29+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Beim Bearbeiten der Garage ist (vermutlich unabsichtlich) eine Relation entstanden und auch die Geometrie des Gebäudes war überlappend. Ich habe es in der Zwischenzeit gefixt.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Digne (2018-01-03 11:19:17+00:00): Hallo Eimert,

Ik zag dat er om feedback gevraagd was.

Ik zie dat je paaltjes hebt toegevoegd. In principe geldt er voor paaltjes dat er geen verkeer door mag, behalve voor fiets en voetgangers. Dus acces=no met bicycle=yes en foot yes. Zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier=bollard?uselang=nl

De extra foot=yes en bicycle=yes zijn dus overbodig en mogen eraf. Je zou wel nog kunnen denken aan mofa=yes en moped=yes voor bromfietsen en scooters. (Als dat het geval is natuurlijk.)
Eimert (2018-01-05 16:04:12+00:00): Hi Digne, is aangepast in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55190500
R0bst3r (2018-01-03 10:52:24+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55124114
R0bst3r (2018-01-03 11:00:43+00:00): Hallo LinaNV,
aus deinem Changeset Kommentar werde ich nicht ganz schlau, was war denn der Sinn davon? Die Änderungen hier bei Aalen habe ich zurückgeändert. Wenn du Hilfe benötigst, kannst du gerne hier antworten oder mir eine Nachricht senden. Ansonsten gibt es auch forum.osm.org für Anfragen.
Viele Grüße
zors1843 (2018-01-03 10:40:54+00:00): Hi,
Do you have more info on this memorial ?  Is it the chapel ?
zors1843 (2018-01-03 10:59:19+00:00): or is it the building 30 meters to the left of the memorial ?
Maartenvb (2018-01-10 07:42:04+00:00): Hi, the memorial is about 50 meters to the east of where I put the marker 7 days ago. Inside a small chapel in the Rue des Martyrs. Below you will find a link to a page about the event on sept 9, 1944. 11 resistance fighters or villagers were shot by the retreating nazi army on sept 9, 1944 (in French) http://www.luxbel.be/modules/extcal/print.php?event=21728
zors1843 (2018-01-10 07:56:08+00:00): Could you please set a marker again on the right place ?  Thanks
zors1843 (2018-01-10 08:01:08+00:00): Is it this monument ?
http://www.bel-memorial.org/cities/luxembourg/marcourt/marcourt_chapelle_martyrs.htm
Constable (2018-02-07 11:28:09+00:00): ciao, occhio ch econ quest amodifica hai (credo involontariamente) vandalizzato una strada a Calolziocorte
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=55124186
Provvedo io a correggere
senna67 (2018-02-08 09:11:05+00:00): Grazie!
Devo aver mosso un punto senza rendermene conto
Constable (2018-02-08 09:19:31+00:00): Immaginavo fosse andata così, grazie per la risposta, buon lavoro, ciao!
Constable (2018-01-03 12:54:02+00:00): why did you remove the building http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=55124196 ?
R0bst3r (2018-01-03 10:52:28+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55124307
iWowik (2018-01-03 21:32:46+00:00): а что motor_vehicle убирать-то? был бы =no
parukhin (2018-01-03 21:43:16+00:00): По footway у нас обычно motor_vehicle  не ходят.
eggie (2018-01-03 10:42:47+00:00): Oke...  oneway=no wordt alleen getagd als je "bang" bent dat een andere mapper er oneway=yes van gaat maken. Bv op parallelfietspaden. 
Kan er dus af.
xlud (2021-06-24 23:00:15+00:00): Kładki już nie ma. Nie jest nieczynna a została rozebrana. Razem ze schodami po obu stronach torów. Nie wiem jak usunąć obiekt.
maption (2018-01-03 10:43:40+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55124732
Supaplex (2018-01-21 10:54:00+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
highflyer74 (2018-01-03 12:05:54+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

In diesem Changeset wurden diverse Gebäude und andere Dinge gelöscht. War das ein Versehen...?

Bitte gewöhne Dir auch gleich aussagekräftige Changeset Kommentare an, damit Deine Mit-Mapper wissen, was Deine Absicht war.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
sander79 (2019-07-05 18:47:35+00:00): Hoi Voorwaarts,

zou je de volgende keer als je building=house zet, de tag construction=house willen verwijderen?

gr,
Sander
Voorwaarts (2019-07-05 19:10:34+00:00): Ja. Ik zal er beter op letten.
user_5359 (2018-01-03 12:50:53+00:00): Hello! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426731067
@Garam (2018-07-30 05:56:48+00:00): I think you don't know Korean language. Please do not edit Hangeul. It is all wrong meanings. Thanks.
SomeoneElse (2018-01-04 11:21:01+00:00): Hi,
Just wondered if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316865419/history etc. was still "landuse=railway" if the Bevercotes branch is no longer in use?
Best Regards,
Andy
Legolash2oLiam (2018-01-04 12:03:41+00:00): Sorry! I believe I made a mistake. 

I've hopefully fixed. I am adding it's speed limits, restrictions, etc...
SomeoneElse (2018-01-04 12:54:26+00:00): Thanks.  What's the licence for the NESA data?
Best Regards,
Andy
Legolash2oLiam (2018-01-04 13:02:29+00:00): There are downloadable PDFs on the link below.

https://www.networkrail.co.uk/industry-commercial-partners/information-operating-companies/national-electronic-sectional-appendix/

Because NR are publicly funded are required to be open on most things. You can ask for an account and you should have one in 10 days. The account makes it easier to find routes rather than trawling through an entire PDF.

I've also put in a FOI request for all of rail signal locations in a spreadsheet for the LNE and LNW areas. They've approved and should have them by Jan 30th.
Legolash2oLiam (2018-01-04 13:05:32+00:00): An example is the just the London North Eastern from the Network Rail site. It's 1186 pages but contains exactly the same information on the on-line version.


http://archive.nr.co.uk/browse%20documents/sectional%20appendix/sectional%20appendix%20full%20pdf%20copies/london%20north%20eastern%20sectional%20appendix.pdf
SomeoneElse (2018-01-04 13:15:12+00:00): Unfortunately I don't think that "are publicly funded are required to be open on most things" will be good enough.  Also, https://www.networkrail.co.uk/terms-and-conditions/ seems to explicitly prohibit use here.
What I'd suggest is that you contact them and obtain an explicit waiver or similar - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GettingPermission for more information.
Best Regards,
Andy
Legolash2oLiam (2018-01-04 13:37:24+00:00): Yeah I knew that quote could back fire. I remember reading on the Network Rail website something similar. They don't however release information on equipment location (in case of theft). Hence why I had to do a FOI request.

Which part of the text are you referring to when you say "explicitly prohibits use here". The only part of see is about sharing account details.

My counter are as follows.

1. The PDF are publicly available to anyone online via their own website.

2. I'm only adding information from the already publicly available source. I have not and will not post any information that is not already available in said document.

3. There is already data contains LOR, ELR, speeds and loading gauges before I even started.

It may be easier to send messages directly rather than comments. Also, I will do as you suggested with NR for further clarification. :)
SomeoneElse (2018-01-04 15:19:52+00:00): I said "explicitly prohibits" because the Ts and Cs of the website talked about "personal and noncommercial use", which wouldn't be good enough for OSM.  Now obviously exactly which data that applies to is a different question, but you've already asked them now, which is great :)
Legolash2oLiam (2018-01-12 09:35:22+00:00): Just putting this out there. I got a response back from Network Rail saying it's fine as long as we source the information.

I've sent an exact quote to SomeoneElse just in case.
dmlu (2018-01-03 14:03:54+00:00): I followed the instructions given by a more experienced portuguese mapper, this seems to be the way to map relations here.
mueschel (2018-01-03 14:36:47+00:00): I wanted to delete the two tags which shouldn't be there:
LUG11 = 018723
LUG11DESIG = Colmeosa

Essentially, if the way is a closed line, there is no need to have a separate relation. In most cases, the ways are not closed and you need a relation to combine them to form a area. This method avoids overlapping lines where the boundaries of two areas meet.
As it's done now it is fine.
ViriatoLusitano (2018-01-04 16:12:10+00:00): This is how it is done across the country though. Having a relation helps organizing them hierarchically.
eggie (2018-01-03 16:37:55+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
DD1GJ (2018-01-03 12:39:57+00:00): Dieser "Park" über mehrere Hinterhofgrundstücke ist bei Deinem bisherigen Edit-Verhalten leider unglaubwürdig.
4004 (2018-01-03 21:37:09+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
то, что это станция, уже подразумевается тегами station, само название станции ведь просто Кобрин? поправил
johsin18 (2018-01-03 12:39:47+00:00): Hallo muma1968,
danke dass du bei OpenStreetMap mitmachst.
An dieser Stelle wäre es allerdings noch besser, du würdest einen neuen Hauseingang für 14 eintragen, und den für 24 an die richtige Stelle verschieben, siehe hier (legale Quelle):
http://www.stadtplan.bs.ch/geoviewer/index.php?language=en&cps=2612022.08,1265779.54,500&srhl=LAYEROBJ_SEARCH_ADDRESS||61226&nodefault&layers=parzplan_vektor_farb_500
Ausserdem würden uns genauere Beschreibungen deiner Änderungen weiterhelfen. "Änderungen wurden hinzugefügt" ist ja eigentlich immer der Fall. In diesem Fall hätte ich geschrieben "Hausnummer hinzugefügt".
Gruss, johsin18
viloan (2018-01-03 12:13:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
M!dgardAutomated (2018-01-03 12:19:10+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54116904, 54116925.
aceman444 (2019-08-10 21:38:01+00:00): Hi, please use use correct shop types from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop, not just shop=yes and also do not write shop description into the 'name' tag, but use real shop name there. You have done many shops in Tapolca incorrectly like this. Thanks.
eggie (2018-01-03 13:48:16+00:00): Tip: Volgens mij heeft het weinig zin om tags te zetten cycleway:both=no
Ook wegen op slot zetten voor voetgangers kun je beter niet doen ivm de routering, behalve als er een bord staat verboden voor voetgangers.
eggie (2018-01-03 13:48:55+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
cricriiiiii (2018-01-04 00:06:28+00:00): Hi eggie, I probably misunderstood what information is needed here. I put no cycleways because there are no specific cycleway marked on this road. But for sure bicycles can use it. Should it be cycleway shared with car then ?
eggie (2018-01-04 08:39:50+00:00): Hi... We are not happy with the app SteetComplete (specialy Add Cycleway) It's  not suited for the Dutch situation. 
Surfacetags and speedlimits are okay with that app.
Here the accesstags for Holland. All "greens" are default and need not to be tagged.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
eggie (2018-01-04 08:42:36+00:00): It's better to use the normal editor iD and most of the experienced members are using JOSM.
https://blog.mapbox.com/become-a-power-mapper-619077da4ef4
Enjoy mapping!
johsin18 (2018-01-03 12:58:00+00:00): Sorry, aber du hast das Transitlager komplett abgerissen.  Ich glaube nicht dass das der Realität entspricht, oder?
mueschel (2018-11-25 11:49:37+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du hier bitte mal nach dem Tagging schauen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136491889

- der Weg gehört zum Wanderweg 11
- hat aber foot=no
- allerdings mit sac_scale
- kreuzt den track mehrere Male
Irgendwie passt das alles nicht so recht.
Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1256399
Gruß, Jan
_torsten_ (2018-11-25 15:12:38+00:00): Hallo Jan, 
ich weiß, dass bei diesem Weg einiges nicht stimmt. Insbesondere die Zutrittberechtigungen. Auf alle Fälle sind die MTB-Trails meist für Wanderer gesperrt. So ist es dort ausgeschildert. 
Ob der Wanderweg 11 immer noch auf dem MTB-Trail oder auf dem parallelen Weg verläuft, weiß ich nicht. Deswegen ja auch mein Kartenfehler: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1256399#map=16/46.8857/10.4890
Was machen wir da nun? Ich bin Ende des Jahres erst wieder dort, bezweifle aber, dass ich da hinkommen. Vermutlich hindert mich der Schnee daran.
Herzliche Grüße, Torsten.
_torsten_ (2018-12-25 16:12:20+00:00): Hallo Jan, ich hab´s mir gestern vor Ort angesehen und korrigiert. Natürlich nur, soweit man das bei 70 cm Schnee kann.
Es ist tatsächlich so, dass der Elventrail und der Wanderweg 11 den Pfad ein Stück gemeinsam nutzen. Ein Einheimischer sagt mir, dass es den Wanderweg 11 nicht mehr gibt. Es stehen aber entsprechender Wegweiser und auch Symbole mit der "11" im Wald herum.
Herzliche Grüße, Torsten.
alester (2018-01-07 02:05:38+00:00): What is your source for these changes? I drove over here today and can find no evidence that there's any work occurring on the roads you've marked as under construction. Also, while Turnstyle Crescent has indeed been extended (you extended it without the name), it isn't open as far as you've mapped. The new section of Kettle Lake Drive also hasn't been opened yet and is still under construction. I'm also confused why you've changed the locations of the new roads, because I also can't find any evidence that they'll be built in the locations you've mapped. If you were simply guessing when you made these changes, it would be far better to leave such mapping to local mappers instead of trying to guess what's happening from a long distance. With all the errors and damage that Telenav editors have been making over the last year, I'd strongly suggest that you scale back any editing until you can learn more about how to properly map before you start making widespread edits.