piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2016-06-11 09:54:58+00:00): Thank you. For a number of purposes maintaining history is quite usefull. For example I often check the history of buildings to determine whether they were created before or after newer imagery became available. If such a building were created before and is not visible on new imagery, I can safely delete it :-). If it was created after, but still not visible, chances are that it's a newly built house and I'd better leave it alone.
Note that checking history in JOSM is as simple as pressing ctrl-h.
fkv (2016-07-12 09:35:18+00:00): Kannst du dir nochmal das MP 6116479 anschauen, es enthält eine unverbundene Linie (409447946) als inner-Member.
Weltstaat (2016-07-12 15:54:58+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habs ausgebessert
SomeoneElse (2016-08-03 22:17:49+00:00): Hello,
I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.  Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.

We're aware that there is disputed territory in the region.  Most notably the area covered by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara , and also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceuta and other areas to the north.

First, it's worth mentioning https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That explains that what matters most to OSM in terms of names, borders and boundaries is the "on the ground" rule.  For example, if a majority of the population of an area speaks language "a" then it makes sense for OSM's "name" tag to be in language "a" (though of course other name tags such as name:b, name:c etc. can also be used to make maps in other languages).  Similarly, if the people of an area consider themselves to be part of country "a" and country "a" does indeed have control over the area, it makes sense for the area to be part of country "a" (and only country "a") in OSM.

Potential problems in the area covered by the Morocco admin_level 2 relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 include:

1) That relation includes not only the part of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara currently administered by Morocco (the part west of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 ), it also includes the part of that territory east of it too.  Is this correct?  It seems at odds with OSM's "on the ground" rule, and with the UN peacekeepers' position described at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/minurso/background.shtml .

2) That relation also includes territories administered by Spain such as Ceuta and Melilla.  What evidence is there that Morocco controls these territories and that Spain does not?

Another major question, (largely dependant on the answer to (1) above) is:

3) If the area east of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 isn't part of Morocco, what status should it have?  http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=195838 did represent this territory and had several different admin levels before it was deleted.

The DWG would be grateful for your opinions on these matters.  You can either reply here or, if you prefer you can email data@osmfoundation.org directly and we'll read through all the replies.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-30 21:12:01+00:00): Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area.  The findings and the changes that will be made are described at 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 .  If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy
Supaplex (2016-06-11 03:16:28+00:00): 重覆了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255987913
DaveF (2016-06-10 09:18:31+00:00): As per my direct message, could you please refrain from make inaccurate edits.
Supaplex (2016-06-11 03:09:13+00:00): 已經有囉
Supaplex (2016-06-11 03:13:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3160756630
Myazyk (2016-06-15 20:28:37+00:00): Йой, я провів був межу Ужоцької сільради, не поставив теґ, а ти видалив :(
chnav (2016-06-10 12:35:45+00:00): Удалил. ОСМ не для персональных закладок.
SammysHP (2016-06-13 10:53:41+00:00): Wurde das große Gebäude abgerissen?
DaveF (2016-06-10 10:33:25+00:00): As explained earlier, OSM does add 'Railway Station' to names of those stations. Please revert.
DaveF (2016-06-10 10:43:08+00:00): *doesn't add...
marczoutendijk (2016-06-11 11:49:34+00:00): Is this correct? I don't see any building at that spot. What is the address for that office?
tuxayo (2018-01-31 12:36:05+00:00): Attention, il y a eu des erreurs sur tout les noms des nœuds sauf un.

Principalement les majuscules et accent.
Geogoeroe (2016-06-10 10:29:22+00:00): Oeps, foute beschrijving... Toevoeging was ihkv cursus
Der Bierpuncheur (2023-11-01 18:06:05+00:00): Hi, I have a question. Beside the main street of Avenue de la Sauvagine - Waterwildlaan there is a designated "highway=service road," but then also has the tag "busway." Why don't we identify these features as "highway=busway?" Just trying to understand, and not confuse the mapping. Thanks!
bxl-forever (2023-11-01 18:35:07+00:00): Hello,

For generic questions, it may better to write a direct message to mappers instead of commenting on their changesets, since this will give the false impression that this changeset is faultly.  This is a changeset from 2016, there was no change we could have used a feature that was proposed only in 2020.

Back in 2016 this was a regular way to tag such situations.  Honestly, I don’t know anybody who collects statistics about busway=* on service roads and this is something that might be worth removing altogether one day.

Maybe that highway=busway could be a good choice in the future, but only after they can fix the issue about it not being rendered at all on the main carto layer.  We already get way too many notes or map changes from people who "don’t see something on the map", so better not use a tag that will make the road completely invisible.
carciofo (2017-12-07 08:43:29+00:00): Hi, could you double check this turn restriction, please? There's a left turn lane on SB 72nd Ave, so it would seem strange that no left turn is allowed. Thanks.
saikabhi (2017-12-07 08:52:23+00:00): Hey carciofo,

Yes you are correct. Double checked through  OpenStreetCam. Removing this restriction. Thank you for pointing out the error.

Cheers
Abhishek
eggie (2022-09-13 09:18:20+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
BCNorwich (2016-06-10 14:48:31+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Unfortunately you have inadvertently made the corner building into a large circular shape.  Also dragging out of shape the building lines within it and the building lines to either side.

It might be best to revert the whole changeset and start again, unless you can remember exactly how things were before your additions. If you don't feel confident I could do the revert for you. Please don't make further additions or alterations until the circle problem is sorted out, it'll only make things more difficult to correct.
Regards.
BCNorwich (2016-06-14 05:51:54+00:00): No response so changeset reverted.
datendelphin (2019-02-15 18:10:30+00:00): Das ist die Alte Grenze von Bremgarten die da wieder zum leben erweckt worden ist. Nun gab es 2 Jahre lang Bremgarten zwei mal.
mbethke (2016-06-22 21:11:20+00:00): Could you add the name of this office, please?
aseerel4c26 (2016-06-10 18:50:03+00:00): Hi Yong Wei, was hast du da hinter die Namen geschrieben? Bitte beachte, dass der "Name" wirklich nur der Name des Objektes sein sollte. Falls du Übersetzungen oder Beschreibungen hingeschrieben hast, dann gehören die woanders hin. Bitte antworte einfach hier. Danke!
R0bst3r (2016-06-15 07:31:29+00:00): Achtung Maps.me User, siehe http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=596678#p596678
aseerel4c26 (2016-07-29 21:37:28+00:00): danke, wurde wohl alles von (dir und anderen) erledigt
Ambush (2017-05-15 10:27:05+00:00): Привет!
Мы не пишем описание объектов в поле name. Вместо этого мы характеризуем их в тэгах: старинную водонапорную башню описываем, как man_made=water_tower и указываем дату строительства start_date=1888. Если точно start_date не известен, можно указать его примерно, даже просто веком. Если представляет историческую ценность -- отмечаем как historic=*

В name пишем только имя объекта, например, у башен гатчинского дворца есть имена -- Сигнальная и Часовая, эти имена описываем в name. У водонапорки в Приорате имени нет, name не задаём.

Успехов в картировании!
MKnight (2016-06-16 15:54:36+00:00): Fertig mit Standort wechseln? Da is einiges im Argen.
e_kloth (2016-06-24 06:35:08+00:00): Ja, mein ich habe meinen Standort gewechselt....., ich weiß, ich muss mich noch um die Relationen kümmern, dies werde ich leider frühstens am Montag schaffen. 
Beste Grüße
Eric
p.s. Entschuldigung das die Antwort so lange auf sich warten ließ, ich war diese Woche Krank.
dieterdreist (2016-06-22 15:52:55+00:00): please map the things at the actual spot, this restaurant is outside of a building. I have moved it now into the neareast building
freebeer (2018-10-27 15:44:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63931378 where the changeset comment is: delete a bogus maps.me castle
neuhausr (2016-06-20 15:18:16+00:00): hi, I'm confused by your tagging here, can you explain or fix?
noliver (2016-06-21 01:19:34+00:00): OK, so that wasn't exactly what I'd intended to do.  Still working out how to use Vespucci.  Thanks for the heads up, changeset #40170321 fixes this to what I was trying to tag.
neuhausr (2016-06-21 15:08:31+00:00): great, thanks!
rickmastfan67 (2016-06-10 12:57:37+00:00): Changeset reverted to repair damage to USA road.  Reverted in Changeset 39929331. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39929331
Marcussacapuces91 (2016-06-11 05:53:06+00:00): Vous ne tenez pas compte des éléments déjà en place. Améliorez la qualité de vos contribution que diable.
trial (2016-06-14 16:19:00+00:00): @Marcussasapuces91, et encore si c'était une exception pour ce contributeur. À sa place j'arrêterais sous ce pseudo pour prendre SeFaireOublier.
J'avais déjà corrigé d'autres B&B sur lequels il avait sévit. Et quand tu penses qu'en plus B&B doit payer pour ce travail de sagouin...
Je pense qu'il va falloir accroître le niveau de viligance Osmose dès qu'on voit
created_by 	Ubiflow www.ubiflow.net
mueschel (2016-06-12 20:58:58+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of "ele:forward =yes"? Can this be deleted?

Jan
Anonix35 (2016-06-13 07:44:52+00:00): C'était par rapport à la note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/495196#map=15/45.9233/7.0218&layers=N
cette personne demandait si on pouvait faire apparaitre en premier ce sommet alors j'ai essayé avec ce tag mais visiblement ca n'a pas marché.

This was compared with the note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/495196#map=15/45.9233/7.0218&layers=N
this person asked if we could bring up first summit so I tried with tag but obviously it did not work.
Ars-UA (2016-06-10 21:26:03+00:00): Детское отделение уже отмечено, убрал детскую неврологию и глазное.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-06-10 13:36:10+00:00): Thanks for catching this and fixing it!!
TheSwavu (2016-06-10 22:10:49+00:00): Welcome back.

We now have permission to use the LPI NSW imagery and base map. They should be available under the imagery menu in JOSM.

The Bing imagery is not very good. For example at Colo Place Bing is out by 7m.
vng_me (2016-06-10 14:31:15+00:00): Не увидел что это не дубликат, а отдельная газовая заправка ...
SomeoneElse (2016-06-10 16:00:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4235008004 just looks like spam to me; I'd delete it.  The address doesn't match.
malenki (2016-06-11 13:06:46+00:00): Hallo kreuzschnabel,

war es Absicht, dass du den Wehener Weg gelöscht hast?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23710460/history
Viele Grüße
malenki
kreuzschnabel (2016-06-11 14:01:04+00:00): Oops, danke fürs Aufpassen. Ich habe den gesamten Verlauf Schützenstr – Wehener Weg – Dornbornstr. auf hw=unclassified umgetaggt (service ist zu klein, driveway erst recht) und dabei den Namen versehentlich unterschlagen. Müsste jetzt wieder stimmen, oder?
malenki (2016-06-11 15:10:13+00:00): Der ursprüngliche "Wehener Weg" war etwas kürzer. Ich war so frei, das ursprüngliche Objekt wiederherzustellen – immerhin geht dessen history schon zurück bis 2008.
Das Wiederherstellen eines gelöschten Objektes geht mit dem undelete-Plugin recht einfach.
kreuzschnabel (2016-06-11 15:39:11+00:00): Danke, und sorry für die Zusatzarbeit. – Weißt du, was die Turn Restriction am Übergang Wehener Weg – Dornbornstraße soll? Dürfen da auch keine Radfahrer geradeaus? So isses nämlich gemappt.
malenki (2016-06-11 15:57:59+00:00): Ich bin ja schon froh, dass du nicht beschwerst, dass ich in deinen Daten herumpfusche. ;)
Ortskundig bin ich leider nicht, die Abbiegerestriktion kann ich nicht beurteilen. Sie gilt für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer (gehen wir der Einfachheit halber davon aus, dass das nur Fahrzeuge betrifft :) )
Wenn du den Abbiegerelationseditor herzunimmst und die Relation editierst, kannst du einen Haken setzen, dass diese Restriktion für Radfahrer nicht zutrifft.
Dadurch wird dieses Tag gesetzt:
except=bicycle
hth
malenki
carciofo (2018-05-08 07:43:52+00:00): Hi, the number of lanes was increased to 4 in this changeset. However, this is exactly the same lane layout in the example on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Crossing_with_a_designated_lane_for_bicycles, where lanes=3. Which is correct?
carciofo (2018-05-08 07:44:54+00:00): Specifically: "Pay attention to the value of the lanes=* key. The number of lanes is referred to the lanes available to the traffic using the main highway=* key, in this example and also by definition of lanes=* key __motorized traffic__."
trigpoint (2016-06-10 16:49:47+00:00): Are you sure this is correct, aerial imagery suggests these are residential streets and is therefore an unlikely place for a bar.
Blackbird27 (2016-06-11 20:37:11+00:00): Почитайте як потрібно правильно мапити: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=10170
А саме: Следует помнить, что в теге name мы ставим украинское название, в теге name:ru -- русское.

Крім цього в назвах POI помилки.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-10 15:57:02+00:00): In addition fixing the problem described in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/969 , it would be really helpful if you could use changeset comments that actually describe the change being made. "1" (used here) doesn't describe anything.  In the future please do use meaningful changeset comments.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

En plus de régler le problème décrit dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/969, il serait vraiment utile si vous pouviez utiliser commentaires des changements qui décrivent réellement la modification faite. "1" (utilisé ici) ne décrit pas quoi que ce soit. Dans l'avenir, s'il vous plaît n'utiliser les commentaires de changeset significatifs.

Meilleures salutations,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) au nom du groupe de travail des données de l'OSM.
literan (2016-06-16 10:07:14+00:00): Правильные теги для уличных скульптур будут такие: artwork_type=statue
name=Памятник доценту из к/ф Джентльмены удачи
tourism=artwork
Supaplex (2016-06-10 15:33:12+00:00): 其實是修一些怪怪的臺北站牌，還有中油復興北路站，天使商旅 臺北101位置。但我JOSM突然不能輸入文字，只好用先前的comment
mavl (2016-06-13 10:13:14+00:00): Различные входы - это тег entrance [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:entrance]. Этот тег добавлен на ваши три точки. Также эти точки включены в линии зданий [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39988926].
user_5359 (2022-04-04 04:47:44+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424095860. What is the meaning of the tag
opertor = 巨大機械工業(股)? Specially with operator = 捷安特?
danieldegroot2 (2022-07-23 16:56:58+00:00): Resolved by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123982789
Müszi (2016-09-18 08:44:10+00:00): Hi!

You changed the trail mark of the hiking route Stâna de Vale - Piatra Tâlharului - Vărășoaia from yellow stripe to yellow triangle, but this is wrong (please have look at the Mountain Rescue Service's web page: http://salvamontbihor.ro/eng/page/trasee-turistice-muntii-bihor ).

Reverted to yellow stripe.
Müszi (2016-10-15 16:09:35+00:00): Hi, it's me again :-)

Looks like you found the old blue triangle trail mark near the Dealu Lui Ilie peak (N46.70108 E22.56399). A few years ago the route has been changed to go through way #374842094 and #374839106, though the old trail marks are still visible.

Here are some recent (as of 2016-10-09) photos:

New blue triangle trail mark at N46.70149 E22.56146:

http://kepfeltoltes.hu/161015/p1320877_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.jpg

Trail mark making a right turn at N46.70180 E22.56129:

http://kepfeltoltes.hu/161015/p1320879_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.jpg
http://kepfeltoltes.hu/161015/p1320880_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.jpg

The old (but still visible) trail marks at N46.70194 E22.56178:

http://kepfeltoltes.hu/161015/p1320889_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.jpg

BTW, I finally found the trail marks between N46.70199 N22.56147 and N46.70325 22.55976 going through N46.70240 E22.56098, so I'll correct all problems.

-- 
Best regards,
Zsolt
Stadtigel (2016-10-18 21:20:46+00:00): I came from Meziad, and I've been looking for a long time at this place. The old markings were very incomplete. But the markings of new path was not visible to me (from this direction).
PS: Your links to the photos do not work.
Müszi (2016-10-19 16:08:49+00:00): Yeah, rather tricky... ;-)

The photo links do work for me even from a different computer (@work), but I uploaded them anyway to a different photo sharing site:

https://postimg.org/gallery/24rh6jsae/
rickmastfan67 (2016-06-10 23:35:16+00:00): There was NOTHING wrong here.  The 'none' part is there to indicate there is a lane splitting into 2 lanes from one.  Taking out the 'none' tells everybody to go to the right into the brand new lane.  Please look at the satellite imagery before editing and look at adjacent ways too.  This is ruining all my hard work on cleaning up areas and adding turn lanes at the same time.
calfarome (2016-06-12 04:24:59+00:00): Hello rickmastfan67!
Thanks for your notification. This will lead us to wonder if the #to-fix should consider as an error the turn lanes "none" added by mappers. I've already reverted my changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39964115.
Thanks again, such feedback helps to create better checks in the system to maintain the high quality of the map.
mattchn (2016-06-11 02:44:36+00:00): The lane count (lanes=5) was correct, the mistake was in the count of forward and backward lanes. I have changed this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327095053/history
DannyAiquipa (2016-08-03 20:12:59+00:00): Thanks for your review !
Supaplex (2016-07-05 18:01:18+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
mattchn (2016-06-13 01:50:18+00:00): Please check with Bing imagery, the current representation seems wrong. Maybe wrong forward/backward tags?
DannyAiquipa (2016-06-24 15:29:45+00:00): Hey there, thanks four your feedback ! I have already fix the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40264382
KellyMartinez (2016-06-10 17:37:04+00:00): the road is the same thing as the unmainted track road pre-identified before I traced the building
sabas88 (2016-06-10 21:21:07+00:00): What's the meaning of "Fähre Civitavecchia"?
Please use at least english, but names are not necessary in this case.
rickmastfan67 (2016-06-10 23:36:11+00:00): There was NOTHING wrong here.  The 'none' part is there to indicate there is a lane splitting into 2 lanes from one.  Taking out the 'none' tells everybody to go to the left into the brand new lane.  Please look at the satellite imagery before editing and look at adjacent ways too.  This is ruining all my hard work on cleaning up areas and adding turn lanes at the same time.
DannyAiquipa (2016-06-10 23:53:54+00:00): Hey there!, Thanks for your comment ,  I have reverted this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39944269
Morten Lange (2016-07-22 09:18:23+00:00): Hér er það líka :-) 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3302172398
user_5359 (2016-06-11 06:33:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! An address information is part of the building not of the street.
pyram (2016-09-20 20:29:07+00:00): After your "cadastre-Import" there are many double buildings in OSM. Please fix it.
E.g. see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358432530
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424137990
Ornans (2016-09-21 07:08:17+00:00): Hi, The for comment. What way should be used to find and correct ?
Kr
pyram (2016-09-22 22:37:02+00:00): Thank you for the answer.
The best would be to revert the last import and than upload only the new/delete the removed buildings.
I never do an import, so I don't know how you can find the difference Data automatically. Maybe you can use an second layer in JOSM to compare, select the new one and merge with the existing once?
mavl (2019-03-28 16:16:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
naoliv (2016-06-10 18:12:08+00:00): Emerson, o que você quis representar aqui no mapa?
opendcc (2018-02-14 14:15:15+00:00): Wieso heißt das Buja Allee? Wurde das so gewidmet?
Goffredo (2016-06-10 19:13:41+00:00): Il nodo del Giocabosco taggato con leisure=yes è un pò generico, andrebbe migliorato con un tag leisure=* (che ne so, playground etc...)
malenki (2016-06-11 12:34:26+00:00): Hallo freakyuser,

in diesem Changeset hast du den Straßenname 
"Im Großen Maierstal"
zu 
"Im großen Maierstal" geändert und als Quelle Maps4BW angegeben.
Nun heißt die Straße in Maps4BW aber "Im Großen Maierstal".
Wie passt das zusammen?
freakyuser (2016-06-11 13:17:45+00:00): Hey,

Ich hab nur die Hausnummern von Maps4bw, im Aussenbereich ist abfahren einfach zu aufwendig. 

Also ich meine auf dem Straßenschild wird das klein geschrieben. Werde es aber nochmal prüfen!
Danke für den Hinweis.
malenki (2016-06-11 13:49:06+00:00): Danke für die prompte Antwort, bin gespannt auf das Resultat. :)
freakyuser (2016-06-12 12:46:40+00:00): So, bin nochmal vorbei gefahren:

Sowohl beim kleinen als auch beim großen Maierstal, sind die unteren Straßenteile auf dem Straßenschild kleingeschrieben, und die oberen Stichstraßen großgeschrieben. (Jeweils keine Verbindung zueinander)

Verstehe das wer wolle.
malenki (2016-06-12 17:09:27+00:00): Sehr hübsch, das Resultat. :P
Wenn du dich etwas mehr engagieren willst, kannst du bei der verantwortlichen Gemeindeverwaltung nachfragen, welche der  Schreibweisen richtig sind.
Manche Verwaltungen sind durchaus dankbar für entsprechende Hinweise.
freakyuser (2016-06-13 14:14:54+00:00): Hab ich gemacht und gerade auch schon eine Antwort erhalten.

Die Großschreibung ist wohl korrekt.

Schätze mal, da war jemand beim Schild bestellen "kreativ"
freakyuser (2016-06-13 14:15:26+00:00): (werde das bei Zeiten dann anpassen)
malenki (2016-06-13 15:54:40+00:00): Vielen Dank fürs Nachhaken.

In solchen Fällen verlinke ich gern dieses Bild:
https://malenki.ch/OSM/Bilder/dscRX018576_Reissigmuehle_small.jpg
:)
freakyuser (2016-06-13 21:14:52+00:00): :D das ist natürlich noch etwas verrückter.

Der Fall hier dürfte in der Praxis zu weniger Problemen führen ^^

Hab es noch als Notiz in den beiden Straßen eingefügt.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-11 11:51:32+00:00): Heet dat huis echt: "eigen huis"?
Lees ook mijn welkomstmail!