piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_717463 (2016-04-22 15:46:39+00:00): а адресация точно по району? Впервые такое вижу)
mavl (2019-01-11 16:53:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Endres Pelka (2016-04-28 19:56:28+00:00): 1. Do sklepów meblowych jest shop=furniture.

2. Jest ustalona składnia dla opening_hours, proszę się z nią zapoznać.
muralito (2016-04-22 17:52:45+00:00): ¿Que policia hay aca?
Achoin (2016-04-22 14:40:05+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы внесли исправления в карту openstreetmap с помощью приложения MAPS.ME.
Ошибка: Смешали кириличесие буквы с латиницей. В дальнейшем при поиске ночного клуба Резиденция пользователи не смогут его найти, так как сложно вбить в поиск Rезиденция... Либо полностью русский либо английский. 
Исправил. + добавил название на английском языке
Исправления должны появиться при следующем обновлении карты MAPS.ME.
Спасибо за участие.
mavl (2019-01-11 16:53:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
EneaSuper (2016-04-23 10:25:36+00:00): Ho controllato alcune mappe toponomastiche, i nomi che ho inserito io sono i più corretti.
Pietro69 (2016-04-23 11:36:25+00:00): Mi spiace ma non sono d'accordo. Le mappe che hai consultato sono sbagliate. Il prefisso "case" ancora può essere accettabile ma il plurale "inferiori" e "superiori" proprio no.
Possiamo discutere sul Ronco Alto o Ronco Superiore... Comunque da profondo conoscitore della zona ti assicuro che le diciture corrette e utilizzate dalla gente del posto sono quelle che ho messo io. Anzi la più giusta sarebbe Ronco d'alto ma è un po antiquata e sostituita da Ronco Alto.
EneaSuper (2016-04-23 11:59:33+00:00): Le mie mappe sono del Comune, ma se mi dici di essere della zona tanto meglio :)
Allora ti consiglio vivamente di mettere Ronco Superiore.
Pietro69 (2016-04-23 12:03:28+00:00): Senza polemica: non mi dirai che sulla mappa del comune c'è scritto Ronco superiori e inferiori?
Comunque metterò la forma più moderna Superiore al posto di Alto
EneaSuper (2016-04-23 12:14:35+00:00): Da quello che mi ricordo mi pare proprio di sì, di conseguenza dopo le mie revisioni li ho modificati, ma "Ronco" non è stato toccato.
Bene, allora siamo apposto :)
mavl (2019-01-11 16:53:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-11 16:53:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-11 16:53:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-11 16:54:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Peter Mead (2016-04-22 15:22:13+00:00): The Wivenhoe Trail is a footpath with permissive use by bicycle.  I don't think it qualifies for tagging as highway=cycleway.
Noen (2016-04-22 15:08:57+00:00): Hvorfor opprette nye multipolygoner med taggene på den ytre veien? Det er enighet om at taggene skal være på relasjonen.
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Usage)
vibrog (2016-04-22 20:28:19+00:00): Det er bare å endre det: Jeg har bare splittet ways, så alt arvet gammel tagging.
muralito (2016-04-26 19:15:27+00:00): Lucas, no te conviene poner datos personales como la direccion en bases de datos abiertas.
laznik (2016-04-22 18:31:46+00:00): dobry den,

Myslim ze mate v tomto changesete chyby:

1. tag "name" by nemal mat hodnotu "kvetinarstvo" ale nieco ako "Kamelia", meno predavajucej a podobne. "Kvetinarstvo" je typ obchodu, nie meno a tato informacia uz je obsiahnuta v tagu shop=florist

2. urcite je v budove ktoru ste otagovali ako amenity=school skola? Podla webu je zakladna skola v tejto dedine na inom mieste.

3. Meno skoly - podobne ako v bode 1 - asi nebude "Skola" ale nieco ako "Zakladna skola Hlinik nad Hronom".
mcld (2016-04-23 09:04:39+00:00): Good work! Was wondering when we could get that done.

(The standard map shows a few "bike store" named buildings. Might be neater to use "bike store" as description rather than name.)
Hjart (2016-04-22 17:05:50+00:00): Entirely removing the highway=* tag imho isn't smart though
changchun_1 (2016-05-25 16:07:57+00:00): Hallo rolandmwagner,
hier stimmt was mit den Layer und Knoten nicht, siehe http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?lang=en&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch60=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch350=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=6&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=49.23148&lon=9.19931&zoom=19&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C50%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198
rolandmwagner (2016-05-25 16:22:41+00:00): Dank changchun_1 und keep right! haben wir zwei echte Fehler (leider auch klassische) gefunden und nun verbessert. Danke!
kayle (2016-06-09 10:28:50+00:00): Zdravím, tie recyklačné miesta sa čím líšia? Keďže je tam rovnaký názov firmy a sú od seba 15m.
ďakujem
user_5359 (2016-04-23 10:43:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! you forgot to add any information to the both node. But please notice: This is a production database, not a test or playground database! I can't see your other entries on the aerial image. And please read the wiki.openstreetmap.org to inform you about the other keys (amenity=place_of_worship add religion, denomination and name ....)
MattKaza (2016-04-22 16:09:44+00:00): *its
user_5359 (2016-04-23 10:34:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I don't think that the Lime Kiln Theatre is a building.
Glassman (2016-04-22 20:33:02+00:00): Do you have the English name for the convenience store?
pete404 (2016-06-10 20:56:58+00:00): Hello,
This changeset states that landuse has been added, but only unlabeled nodes appear in the area. Nodes without labels will be removed unless its part of an area/way. I believe that it is an error, so I inform you of this issue.
valerietheblonde (2016-06-14 01:05:16+00:00): Hello! This was a JOSM upload gone awry. Feel free to remove all unlabeled nodes!
PT-53 (2016-05-01 06:41:04+00:00): Du hast wiedereinmal einen Flurnamen als Straßennamen verwendet.
Vielleicht könntest Du Dir mal angewöhnen das korrekt einzutragen.
Eingaben berichtigt.
PT-53 (2016-05-01 06:54:31+00:00): Nicht vorhandenen Straßennamen wieder gelöscht.
rab (2016-04-22 17:59:28+00:00): Do not create this mini residential areas!!!
d1g (2016-04-23 14:09:38+00:00): Привет! 

Случайно задел кусок админ границы https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370883955/history

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=38795251

В iD можно отключать админ. границы, но это не безотказно работает, просто внимательнее нужно быть когда есть объекты похожие на границы
zool (2016-05-01 08:41:48+00:00): In this changeset you have deleted a couple of sections of residential street. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/412427441 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180183982 - why?
zool (2016-05-07 12:04:30+00:00): In this changeset several stretches of abandoned railway have been re-tagged as rail - have they been re-opened?
user_5359 (2016-04-23 10:14:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have move your address node to the next building. I  hope this is correct.
austi1996 (2017-07-18 20:09:55+00:00): Hi juhanjuku,

I observed several hiking routes in Iceland which were created by you and which are copies from "Rother Wanderführer". Most routes I visited exist as trail markings, but not with signs or names visible in the field. At least "Hvannagil an der Hvannagil-Schlucht" does not exist as marked trail!

Therefore, I have some questions:
- Do you have a permission from "Rother Bergverlag" to insert the routes into OSM
- Have you checked the routes in the field?
- Is there an agreement to insert routes which are not signed in the field in Iceland?
- Why do you added German names to the routes in Iceland?

Greetings,
Daniel
juhanjuku (2017-07-19 06:27:01+00:00): Hi Daniel,
 - I do belive I have not violated "Rother Bergverlag" copyright. None of my routes are direct copies from original gps tracks from book. When I plan my vacation hikes, I usually buy Rother red book and make for choosed trips route relations in OSM. I use existing ways in OSM and if possible, make corrections with aerial images (for Iceland are quite good aerials and I checked permission to use them). GPS tracks from book are just for general direction (often they are not very accurate)
 - usually I manage hike 5 to 10 prepared hikes during my vacation and those tracks I correct afterwards according my gps track and pictures. 
 - you are right here, I have not asked agreement. I will contact Rother Bergverlag and when they are not agree, I will remove all Rother routes relations which are not walked trough by me.
 - I used German names for routes specifically to guide hikers to buy those great books from Rother
BR
juhanjuku
juhanjuku (2017-07-19 09:38:14+00:00): Just got answer from Rother Bergverlag:

glad to hear you’re a fan of hiking and our guides.

We approve that you refer to our books as source of information for improving OSM.

Just consider the following:
Do not upload our GPS tracks, so that they can be downloaded (e.g. as gpx or kml) by others.

And yes, we are interested if you notice mistakes in our tracks or descriptions. In these cases send us an email to: leserzuschrift@rother.de
We are also glad if you send us corrected GPS tracks, but then you must be willing that we use them free of charge and for our own purposes.

Wishing you nice hikes!

Kind regards

Florian Tukker
Lektorat und Herstellung
Bergverlag Rother GmbH
Keltenring 17
D-82041 Oberhaching
Tel. (+49) 089 / 60 86 69 - 29
www.rother.de
austi1996 (2017-07-25 21:25:10+00:00): Hi,
thanks for your fast answer and the contact to Rother. I understand how you add the ways and routes. This is a valid procedure, but I prefer to check the routes in the field.
However, I still have to problems withe the Rother routes in OSM:
- The routes can be downloaded as GPX, for example at https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=6161058
- The routes are marked and visible in the fiedl. Is there a consensus in the Icelandic OSM community to add such virtual routes?
Greetings,
Daniel
juhanjuku (2017-07-26 05:26:54+00:00): - yes, OSM routes can be downloaded, but they are not copies from Rother originals. I newer copy original routes to OSM
- Rother original routes are recorded with gps by authors of book. They are not virtual.
juhanjuku
user_5359 (2016-04-23 10:30:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Yes there exist a better way. You must dived the street in two parts (sorry i didn't work with iD, i can't explain this in details, I have done this for you). Can you describe me, which part of he street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/412931271 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370119446) have the reduced speed?
user_5359 (2016-04-23 11:05:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't forget to describe the objects! If https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213394361 is a Wal-Mart, please add a shop=supermarket to the way (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket).
Torre Paseo del Parque (2018-12-26 14:56:58+00:00): The name of the place is incorrect and the real one is "Torre Paseo del Parque"
Skinfaxi (2018-04-19 18:51:33+00:00): hej Fringilius,
jag funderar över den relationen landskapsgräns Östergötaland. Den är inritad så att det uppstar ett "hål" mellan landskapet Småland och landskapet Östergötaland. Nu har Du bara städad upp i denna changeset. Men hur meningsfullt är det egentligen med denna gräns?
Fringillus (2018-04-20 11:14:28+00:00): Hej!
Ja, jag lade bara till wikidata på gränsrelationer, jag har inte ritat något.
Antar att du menar området kring Valdemarsvik? Isf är det för att kommunen är uppdelad med en del i landskapet Östergötland och en del i landskapet Småland, men ändå ligger administrativt under Östergötlands län i sin helhet. Alltså Småland administreras inte bara av Kronobergs och Jönköpings län, utan även av Östergötlands län i nordost. 
Vet inte om det är det området du menar, säg till annars.
Skinfaxi (2018-04-20 13:55:02+00:00): Ja exact där. Du glömde nog Kalmar Län som del av Småland. Låndskåosgräns för Småland ärritad parallellt med Jönköping / Kronoberg / Kalmar län. Det kan diskuteras hur länge som helst, Tjust var ju ett av dom små län och historiskt har den exacta gränsförloppet ändras meta än en gang  Men nu ligger låndskåpsgränsen som aktivt och inte historiskt gräns...
Skippern (2016-11-09 22:03:51+00:00): I noticed that this relation is missing name, and with investigation lead to this changeset deleting the name. Was this done accidentally, or is there a reason to remove the name?
Hjart (2016-04-22 21:27:50+00:00): Jeg vil mene det er en god ide at angive om det er en container eller en hel genbrugsplads (recycling_type=centre) der er tale om.
Владимир К (2016-05-05 06:18:59+00:00): Вы обозначили названия озер через родники?
sergeybe (2016-05-14 13:20:13+00:00): Нет ни какой пользы в указании родников в озерах. Эту правку нужно откатить или исправить.
eggie (2018-02-13 21:08:00+00:00): Na jaren weer een edit.. Daarom... Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Hjart (2016-04-22 21:24:24+00:00): Det er en god ide så vidt muligt at bruge eksisterende objekter i stedet for at slette og tegne nye, da historikken på denne måde bevares
ChrisTheCat (2016-04-22 21:41:00+00:00): OK. Det skyldes måske at jeg benyttede ID til rettelsen? Jeg kunne ikke umiddelbart ændre linieforløbet til et område. Derfor endte jeg med at slette og gentegne.
Hjart (2016-04-22 21:47:14+00:00): Ok. Den eneste forskel på et lukket "linieforløb" og et "område" er de tags der er på dem, så du kunne bare have tilføjet at det er en park mm. Er området fredet?
ChrisTheCat (2016-04-23 11:23:31+00:00): OK. Ja, området er fredet.
sergeybe (2016-04-23 11:51:32+00:00): Если не понимаете, как устроена карта OSM пожалуйста не трогайте. Вы сейчас сделали два отношения "Крымский федеральный округ". Правка будет откачена.
Rom1 (2016-04-25 09:12:19+00:00): Hi,
Why did you change source tag "Bing" to "bing"? "Bing" is the correct value http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
HoloDuke (2016-04-25 19:54:14+00:00): Hi, 
JOSM recommends to change it from Bing to bing. So I accepted the change.
Rom1 (2016-04-25 19:57:57+00:00): I don't have such message from JOSM (version 9979) when using "Bing".
HoloDuke (2016-04-25 20:13:55+00:00): I use also JOSM 9979. I just retried adding a source=Bing and try to upload. The Data Validator complains about a misspelled value saying "Value 'Bing' for key 'source' looks like 'bing'.  - Misspelled property value (1)"

Do You use the Data Validator?
HoloDuke (2016-04-25 20:24:32+00:00): I don't know which check produces this message (I have them all enabled). In fact You are right it doesn't make sense to replace Bing by bing. Do You know the node then I can change it back.
Rom1 (2016-04-25 20:24:58+00:00): Yes i use it.
Rom1 (2016-04-26 06:54:14+00:00): Here they are:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146658199
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132553664
HoloDuke (2016-04-27 17:13:32+00:00): Reverted!
nammala (2017-02-21 04:30:56+00:00): Hi julio osorio,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The `area=yes` tag is not valid for buildings. The buildings should be given http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
ff5722 (2016-11-30 13:26:39+00:00): You connected a motorway to a tertiary road as level crossing. This only makes matters worse, please pay attention to the road types before connecting them.
ridixcr (2016-12-01 22:55:56+00:00): Hi ff5722,

Thank you for notifying me about this. This was an oversight on my part. Hope this change hasn't done much damage to the map. I will henceforth be very careful about what I am editing on the map.

Thanks for your feedback
LivInTheLookingGlass (2018-08-12 23:13:36+00:00): Hi! I was hoping to ask about your tagging here. I think that this is not correct. If you can explain your reasoning as to why driveways are tagged as areas (instead of driveways) and people's backyards are buildings, then I would be happy to hear it. If I don't hear back in a week or so, I will start to re-work these areas.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-07 09:07:00+00:00): This changeset added a fake connection between a bridge and the highway it crossed. (Bridge was probably not tagged at the time.)
Peter Bremer (2016-09-28 23:22:31+00:00): Hoi Rick!

Ik zie dat je in deze wijziging onder andere de voetgangersweg die door de voetgangersruimte van de Paradoespromenade liep, weggehaald hebt. (Zie https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/411834418) Dit was misschien per ongeluk, maar voor het geval dat je dacht dat dit beter was: ook wanneer een brede voetgangersweg als de Pardoespromenade als een gebied is ingetekend, moet er toch ook nog een simpele weg doorheen lopen, omdat deze voor de routeberekening gebruikt wordt.
Rom1 (2016-05-01 20:02:58+00:00): Quelle est la signification du tag "rural". Je n'ai rien trouvé sur le wiki. Merci
Ergerzher (2016-05-05 19:02:20+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je suis désolé de ne pas pouvoir répondre à votre question.
Le tag rural a été ajouté à certains des chemins du Changeset  par Tetramonium en 2011. Probablement, il/elle est le mieux placé/e pour répondre à votre question.
Kenavo
Rom1 (2016-05-09 07:02:16+00:00): Il n'est plus actif depuis 11 mois. Il ne faut pas hésiter à retirer des tags qui n'ont pas de signification...
Chris Fleming (2016-04-25 11:18:53+00:00): I'm not sure that this makes sense. Removing the neighbourhood node and adding the Holy Corner - name to the node as part of the junction? 

Also there wasn't anything wrong with the Church Hill node?
jlcod (2016-04-23 15:04:32+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen bei OSM!
Der angelegte Kindergarten ist bis jetzt nur eine Linie (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/412844642), was wahrscheinlich nicht so gewollt ist. Dieser eine Punkt hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4141737086 sollte wohl in das gegenüberliegende Eck, dann passt es. :)
Jjnecco7714 (2016-04-23 00:25:03+00:00): Continued roadway from cell next to my assigned cell.
Jjnecco7714 (2016-04-23 19:15:49+00:00): Added roads
Glassman (2017-02-19 00:23:30+00:00): you might want to fix the service areas you created. It should be a way tagged highway=service;service=driveway.  I modified two as an example of how they should be mapped.
gormo (2016-06-27 08:54:35+00:00): Please take a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace , terrace is not meant for patios, but for terraced buildings.
27OuM1687O9ugtu5crv4 (2016-04-29 13:21:49+00:00): Please delete or move to -39.824295 -73.230558
user_5359 (2016-04-23 10:54:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node. f you need help: You are welcome!
voschix (2017-02-05 16:59:49+00:00): Hi Brandon, you replaced the street name with the name of the running trail that runs along this street. If the running trail is trailblazed you should use a running route relation to represent it, but not change the name of the street. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
If you need help doing this, please contact me via OSM.
Brenda78 (2017-03-28 14:58:26+00:00): Sorry for the delay in response..  I believe this change is right.  The reason being that this is the OLD soncy road, which was converted into a running trail years ago for runners and bicyclists.
Brenda78 (2017-03-28 14:59:48+00:00): The new Soncy road is just to the right of the Soncy Running trail.
Warin61 (2018-10-25 22:13:37+00:00): Bluemeric Tech is not an embassy!
Rudolf Mayer (2016-11-17 14:33:48+00:00): There was quite some mess created with this changeset, and e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38839575; many parts of the golf course were marked as separate golf courses, and many arbitrary and partially empty relations were created. fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43730904 et al.
Polyglot (2016-04-23 11:22:23+00:00): Please, don't attach highways to landuse. Cheers, Jo
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2020-11-02 07:38:33+00:00): Hi Necronomicon,
I've adjusted the highway (way 412891923) geometry based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
thank you
gudensberger (2023-10-21 20:56:39+00:00): Moin, woher kommt der Name "Bahnhof Südseite" für die Wege? Im ALKIS konnte ich leider nichts entsprechendes erkennen…
user_53559 (2023-10-22 04:12:50+00:00): Daran kann ich mich nach so langer Zeit leider nicht mehr erinnern.
R0bst3r (2016-04-26 06:32:36+00:00): Hey Wim L,
you've added ""=yes to http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4142343993. 
What was your intention?
Wim L (2016-04-26 08:13:45+00:00): That must have been meant to be a "building=yes". Thanks for pointing it out.
geevee (2016-12-06 16:03:11+00:00): Is it some equipped point from which one can see Trolltunga or it is just a random point? Also, it doesn't seem to be accessible by path path.
Graf Westerholt (2016-12-26 11:06:43+00:00): Hast du hier das PH=off vergessen? Siehe http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?setLng=de
geri-oc (2016-06-05 14:45:44+00:00): von Pohrsdorf bis Hartha landuse Überlappungen entfernt - landuse an landuse (auch wenn es ein MP ist) - ways und landuse (tw,) getrennt.
malenki (2016-06-05 15:06:26+00:00): Wenn man einmal so ein Gebiet in Arbeit hat, fasst man zwar vieles an, aber alles schafft/findet man meistens doch nicht. Danke für die Nacharbeit!
aceman444 (2016-04-23 12:03:39+00:00): Hi, this change is totally incorrect. The name of the bus stop has nothing to do with the bus line (29) that stops there. Also, there are many other bus lines stopping there, which you didn't add. The name of the stop is "Most SNP" so please do not put any random text in there. I'll remove the change.
Jose Riha (2016-04-23 12:14:55+00:00): Thank you aceman444, I appreciate it
malenki (2016-05-07 09:42:47+00:00): Forsthaus Lützel scheint seine eigene Adresse zu sein & haben:
http://www.cora-hunold.de/artcontact.htm
surveyor54 (2016-06-30 16:47:19+00:00): Das ganze ist hier etwas komplizierter. Das Forsthaus Lützel gehört noch zur Gemarkung Großenhausen. Da die Gemeindegrenzen hier nur grob eingezeichnet sind, habe ich alle Tags auf den Zustand vor 12.2015 zurückgesetzt, bzw. revertiert.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40397163
malenki (2016-06-30 16:57:12+00:00): Vielen Dank fürs Recherchieren und Bearbeiten.
maraf24 (2016-04-23 22:45:05+00:00): Czy wszystkie domy w Olszynach są z natury takie krzywe, tj. nie mają w ogóle kątów prostych?
I dlaczego po raz drugi wprowadzasz adresy - jak widać teraz dobrze na mapie, każdy jest podwójnie.
poornibadrinath (2016-06-08 10:21:13+00:00): Hi @Didi_R
   Since the part of the road Bolivar you renamed looks like it is part of a dual carriage way of Avenue Libertad, can you please explain as to why you renamed the part of the road to a different name? Or is it just one road and the Avenue Libertad has been renamed to Bolivar?

Best, 
 Poornima Badrinath
joost schouppe (2016-05-30 12:40:18+00:00): Je busroute bestaat uit maar één segment?
SustainableMobile (2016-05-30 18:58:06+00:00): De wijziging is blijkbaar niet opgeslagen.
Dit is de meest recente situatie van de buslijnen: https://static.delijn.be/Images/Folder%20Gaversesteenwegapril2016%20LR_splits_tcm3-13391.pdf

Ik ga nog op zoek om de segmenten 'in batch' te veranderen.
Warin61 (2020-01-09 23:31:13+00:00): Hi,

Just updating Sawyers hut .. when I noticed these boundaries look a little strange compared to the current Base map? There is not a consistent shift as you'd expect from the 1.8 meter 'adjustment' .. but something more than 6 meters .. and not in a consistent direction. An ideas as to what is going on?
TheSwavu (2020-01-12 06:02:10+00:00): Looks like the easement for the Snowy Mountains Highway has been changed since 2016. Other than that the boundary appears to still be the same.

Also Base Map is still GDA94, hasn't been updated to GDA2020 yet.
Warin61 (2020-01-12 08:46:53+00:00): Looks to me like they have changed it to suit the present road. The 'old' easement may have been a previous road alignment.
user_5359 (2016-04-23 13:58:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice these is a double entry to the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2297717898 . I haver merge the both entries.