piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2018-12-21 11:38:58+00:00): Hi
you can use the tags
proposed:highway or
planned:highway
for such objects.

Cheers, Jan
Commodoortje (2018-12-09 19:05:20+00:00): Changeset wat nader bekeken, hierbij wat aanbevelingen gegeven en wijzigingen aangebracht.
Zie YouTube filmpje.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPKHRuyTRqY
eggie (2018-12-09 21:28:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-09 21:32:39+00:00): Alle artseninfo heb ik verplaatst naar de officiële adresnode nr 1. 
MVG,
Eggie
Prince Kassad (2018-12-09 17:29:56+00:00): Für diese Änderung möchte ich aber sofort eine Quelle sehen, "mapillary" ist es jedenfalls nicht. Ansonsten wird gnadenlos revertiert.
elumbella (2018-12-09 17:43:49+00:00): Ich habe mir ausgehend von der Beobachtung https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1580874 mal alle Bilder auf mapillary von der Gegend angeschaut. Ich kann dir später wenn ich wieder zuhause bin gerne die genauen Fotos zeigen. Wenn du damit immer noch nicht zufrieden bist fahre ich da morgen auch nochmal hin und mache aktuelle Bilder.
elumbella (2018-12-09 22:28:26+00:00): Das stichhaltigste Bild, das ich finden konnte, war dieses: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.102364350000016&lng=8.675849019999987&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=ezWMToAjT2iOuCORTyODKw&x=0.5012240725637862&y=0.4545569830893894&zoom=0 in der Dürerstraße.

Aber abgesehen davon: Wie soll man denn bitte der B45 folgen können, wenn man nicht vom Deutschherrnufer links auf die Walter-Kolb abbiegen darf? Die aktuelle Kartierung ist also auch nicht 100% valide.
elumbella (2018-12-09 22:34:04+00:00): Diese auch noch: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.105597&lng=8.678246&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=tTLpTmBuOcVUpEA_Lqvl0Q&x=0.562187086110235&y=0.3193799366728781&zoom=0.3278350515463918

Da steht ganz klar, dass die B 45 entlang des Schaumainkais die Schweizer Straße kreuzt.
elumbella (2018-12-09 22:37:46+00:00): Zu guter Letzt dieses: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.10724018054711&lng=8.688758453760897&z=17.69121080214298&focus=photo&pKey=vCwXwM5Y3WI9a1cT_WjwRw&x=0.6597730247215229&y=0.36628270109188277&zoom=1.9670103092783509

Man kann die 43 zwar nur erahnen hinter dem Laub, aber welche soll da sonst sein?
Prince Kassad (2018-12-10 17:29:28+00:00): Hm du hast recht. Steht sogar (richtig) im alten Netzknotenplan von Hessen, war nur bei uns jahrelang falsch bzw. fehlend. Hätte ich mal vorher dort reingeschaut.

Dann aber müssten alle Straßen, die zur B43 gehören, highway=primary haben. Wenn z. B. durch die Dürerstraße der gesamte überörtliche Verkehr aus Frankfurt raus führt, ist das keine gewöhnliche Ortsstraße (highway=residential).

Das ist kein Beinbruch, das kann man nachholen. Nur als Hinweis.
kapazao (2018-12-10 10:20:26+00:00): Buenos días, he visto que en tus cambios no usas las imágenes PNOA Spain, que es lo que se recomienda en la comunidad de OSM España.
Estuvieron desactivadas un tiempo en el editor ID, pero las han vuelto a activar. No sé si a lo mejor es por ello que no las usas.
Te recomiendo que uses esas imágenes cuando te sea posible.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65319980
itrivi (2018-12-10 15:36:41+00:00): Sí que lo uso, pero voy cambiando de imágenes según la zona, y por supuesto sólo cambio zonas que conozco bien y de las que dispongo de tracks GPS hechos por mí mismo. De todos modos no conocía la recomendación sobre PNOA. ¡Muchas gracias! Cualquier cosa que veas que haga mal por favor me lo dices. Hay cosas que quiero mapear pero que no aparecen detalladas en la ayuda de OpenStreetMap, como las casetas de vigilancia forestal.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65319980
Commodoortje (2018-12-09 19:12:28+00:00): Je omschrijving van de changeset is "paden toegevoegd"
Waarom verwijder je dit gebouw, en pas je het aan naar landuse=cemetery?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265169371
.
Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
eggie (2018-12-09 21:19:54+00:00): De begraafplaats heb ik weer omgezet in gebouw.
De uitvaartonderneming was al goed getagd op een node. Die heb ik nog even gecombineerd met de adresnode.
Graag reactie dan kunnen we je evt helpen met toekomstige edits. 
Probeer je svp goed in te lezen voordat je van alles gaat veranderen aan bijdragen van voorgaande mappers.
MVG,
Eggie
Commodoortje (2018-12-09 19:14:56+00:00): Ik twijfel niet aan je goede bedoelingen, maar je loopt te hard, waardoor je meer stuk maakt dan dat je aan waarde toevoegd.
Commodoortje (2018-12-09 19:20:16+00:00): Probeer in contact te komen met eggie of met mij, om verdere problemen te voorkomen.
Verdy_p (2018-12-09 22:00:20+00:00): this is not a complete changeset (there are other pending changes but the changeset was closed by the server before termination)
Verdy_p (2018-12-09 22:07:39+00:00): continued in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65320580
Verdy_p (2018-12-09 22:08:00+00:00): continued in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65320587
Verdy_p (2018-12-09 22:08:50+00:00): sorry, bad number:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65326287
mavl (2018-12-10 16:52:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
"Сквер сибирских кошек" уже обозначен на карте. Ваши изменения отменены.
muralito (2019-12-09 18:05:04+00:00): Hola. 
¿Porque le agregaste un fixme a los opening_hours que son cosas cerradas al publico por largo tiempo?
mweper (2019-12-09 18:41:18+00:00): Hola Muralito. 
El fixme es para que algun mapeador local corrija la sintaxis de la etiqueta. 
Por lo que entiendo, el valor "closed" debe ir acompañado de los días y horarios en que se encuentra cerrado.
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Summary_syntax)

Si el lugar está cerrado permanentemente, creo que se debería reemplazar la etiqueta principal por alguna con "abandoned:" o "disused:".
Puedes validar el horario en https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Saludos
muralito (2019-12-10 01:41:20+00:00): Yo lo entiendo de otra forma, lo que dice el wiki "closed or off: closed at the indicated dates and times (or permanently if no time is given), except at overriding dates and times that follow;"
es cuando no esta abierto al publico. La herramienta de validacion de horario que enlazaste no respeta lo que el wiki declara, y ante cualquier duda que tengas la sintaxis es clara que permite "closed mensaje" sin especificar dia u hora. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours/specification

Creo que abandones o disused no corresponde, porque p. ej. un museo sigue estando en ese lugar, mantiene las colecciones que tenia y sigue realizando actividades de mantenimiento y otras vinculaciones con la comunidad.
mweper (2019-12-10 13:31:05+00:00): Fijandome en los ejemplos que tiene debajo el validador externo, me encuentro con este 
(24/7 closed "always closed") que puede servir mejor.
Ese ejemplo lo valida bien, tiene el cuando con el "24/7" y no se debería modificar demasiado la sintaxis de los PDI.

https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=24%2F7%20closed%20%22always%20closed%22
andrewwiseman (2018-12-10 23:40:12+00:00): Hi there, it looks like you deleted some one way tags, removed or added some ref tags, and changed some highway classifications. Can you explain your sources for these edits?
daroKPPSP (2018-12-10 08:07:47+00:00): Ten rodzaj nie należy do NASYPU  a raczej do skarpy. Proszę o poprawienie opisu.
nickjohnston (2019-01-23 18:24:08+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for taking the time to improve the map.

The commercial area you added would probably be clearer as a pedestrian area. Also, I wouldn't call it "promenade", because it's only part of the Promenade. For future reference, please use an initial uppercase letter for names (Promenade, not promenade), unless there's a good reason not to. It helps keep the map looking smart.

BTW, you can add points or nodes or trees (within the area). Sometimes it can be hard to get an accurate count of trees from aerial imagery, so you could count the number of trees on the ground, and then add the position of the trees from imagery.
aseerel4c26 (2018-12-09 21:05:57+00:00): Hallo Roman, du hast per review_requested = yes um Überprüfung gebeten. Sieht alles okay aus. Hast du eine besondere Frage oder Unsicherheit? Schreib einfach hier, ich gucke wieder vorbei.
carfog81 (2018-12-10 17:11:19+00:00): El parque Biosaludable Río Melendez ya tiene polígono, no es necesario poner polígonos encima
klonoa (2018-12-10 17:15:37+00:00): Vale, los quitaré entonces.
carfog81 (2018-12-10 17:44:52+00:00): Ya los quité!
Carlos Brys (2018-12-12 10:32:23+00:00): Ustes ha modificado información sin respetar los criterio establecidos por la comunidad de OSM Paraguay, cambiando indebidamente la clasificación de las avenidas.
Sus cambios serán revertidos
santamariense (2018-12-09 19:05:58+00:00): Good. Only give a name to each of your changesets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65322584
mavl (2018-12-24 23:55:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
aquarix (2018-12-10 23:40:51+00:00): Hello Alfonso RG,
have you been on-site in Holzkirchen? The fact that I'm asking is because all satellite images at the construction site at the new bridge over the B318 is outdated. I know that because I drive there some days a week. The turn restrictions you added directly at the motorway exit are also incorrect because you can exit B318 at this place and it will be possible after the construction works. Also you tagged some roads the wrong class.
Also you have drawn some things that maybe will become true in 2019 but are not present this time. So I would like you to revert this changeset because you've changed too much that doesn't correspond to reality.
Best regards
aquarix
Alfonso RG (2018-12-11 11:03:34+00:00): Hallo Aquarix, tut mir leid.

IM sorry for this changes, I have a friend in Munich that goes very often to this area, and told me the works were very advanced. I tried to update the works but I used out of date imagery. I apologize for this mistake.

I was trying to undone my changesbut I cannot find that option in the edition menu. Could you be so kind of revert my changes, please?

Once again, sorry for my mistake. Have a good day :)
aquarix (2018-12-11 20:15:03+00:00): Hello Alfonso RG,
I was able to revert the complete change set. No problem.
When the construction work is finished and there are updated satellite pictures you can have a look at it again. No offence.
Best regards
aquarix
carfog81 (2018-12-10 17:11:29+00:00): El parque Biosaludable Río Melendez ya tiene polígono, no es necesario poner polígonos encima
woodpeck_repair (2018-12-09 20:28:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65324556 where the changeset comment is: Restoring Ukraine as per https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2018-11-14_Crimea .
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:35:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
seewäldler (2018-12-14 21:20:48+00:00): Hallo!
Mit deiner Änderung hat der Busbahnhof Friedrichshafen nun "Platz 1" bis "Platz 7" und "Stadtbahnhof Platz 8", welcher als "Platz 8" schon eingetragen war. Vor Ort sind die Haltestellen als Platz 1 bis 8 ausgezeichnet ohne weiteren Zusatz. Ist diese Änderung sinnvoll oder nötig?
EvanE (2018-12-16 16:05:49+00:00): Meines Erachtens schon. 

Wenn du wie ich in diesem Fall Fernbuslinien (hier Flixbus 006 Zürich-Berlin) bearbeitest, sind Namen wie Platz 8 ziemlich nichtssagend. Eigentlich hätte ich Friedrichshafen Platz 8 nehmen sollen. 

Wenn man nur regionale Buslinien bearbeitet, dann mag eine kurze Form wie "Platz x" ausreichend sein. 

In anderen Städten sind die Fernbus-Haltestellen an anderer Stelle als die Busstation für die Regional-Linien. Dann ergibt sich das Problem nicht. 

Edbert
Филиппок (2018-12-26 16:41:02+00:00): Нет там никакого хаба , никто не пересаживается .
Хаб на Саяхате.
gscholz (2018-12-31 09:50:29+00:00): Hola,
can you please avoid to stick houses to streets? As you can see here in this error report way can no longer propperly connected (red dot):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-77.01327&lat=-11.88170&zoom=17

Can you fix this error please?

And please look closely to the images you are copying your houses from. In reality you are not mapping houses but residential areas. The buildings are significantly smaller. Please fix this.

Saludos
Guido
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-12-09 19:35:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
dval (2019-09-09 10:39:33+00:00): В JOSM (не знаю, как в iD) есть удобные способы рисования зданий (напр., мне пришлось выровнять углы до 90 градусов на здании ГСК Надежда после того, как я изменил по космоснимку Esri его размеры с помощью одного удобного инструмента).
aseerel4c26 (2018-12-09 21:01:07+00:00): Hello Gergely,

I guess you are aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct . Where ist the discussion of this change? Thank you! :-)
felipeeugenio (2018-12-11 17:53:46+00:00): Hello. What it the purpose (sense) of this edit?
GergelySzekely (2018-12-11 18:10:53+00:00): I'm aware of the code of conduct for automated edits. I considered this change as correcting some typos.

I cannot imagine that something really closes exactly 1 minute before midnight. These typos come from that in some easy-to-use tools it is not possible to add 24:00. I also made this error twice before. I thought it would be good idea to fix them all in one go. 

If I was there I thought replacing "Mo-Su 00:00-24:00" with "24/7" is also a good idea because of rendering reasons.
aseerel4c26 (2018-12-13 08:17:14+00:00): Hi Gergely, thanks for your reply. Automated edits may be a good idea - maybe also in this case. However, ...

* because a single person may not notice that some search and replace term is a bit too broad and might catch other stuff too (e.g. in comment tags or in " "), and ...      
* because one single person might not think of the edge cases where a shop really closes 1 minute before midnight (what about some strange local laws? - you edited globally!) ...     
* because your "24" is not compliant with the opening hours syntax summary ("    HH: An absolute 2-digit hours number (in day, in 24h format, no am/pm) in range 00-23, e.g. Fr 08:30-20:00.") at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening hours . However, further down on this page there are examples and rules which mention "24". Furthermore the 24 is mentioned on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours/specification#hour  . But in my opinion this should be clarified (in the wiki) if such and edit is done. Maybe this syntax summary is even one of the root causes for the 23:59 appearing.     

Because all of that there should be a clear (e.g. felipeedwards seems not to understand your changeset comment here)  documentation what and how you do the edit and a discussion of the reasoning BEFORE the edit.

At https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6122930606/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6122927079/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6122930581/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1430272405/history a single of your edits was reverted (accidentally?!) by another user using a rocketdata.io bot. Get in contact with them, I would suggest. Bot wars do not help...

I have reverted your edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65433548 . Please have a discussion before doing your automated edit.
GergelySzekely (2018-12-13 11:39:12+00:00): Hi aseerel4c26, thanks for the detailed reply. 

I'm sorry for not discussing it with the global community before doing the automated edit. Actually, I was not aware that there is such an option and also I was pretty sure that this had been a harmless improvement. Nevertheless, I perfectly understand your concerns and that you have retrieved this edit. 

I let go of this issue because it is not that important to fix the erroneous 23:59 closing times (or to uniformize the entry for non-stop openings). 

Out of curiosity: is there a way to discuss these kind of things globally? (I guess not really.)
InsertUser (2018-12-13 12:46:14+00:00): Yes, as stated in the previously linked Automated Edits code of conduct, discussion is typically held on the relevant mailing list. 
Also as a quirk of local governance some establishments may well be nominally open until 23:59 and it would be perfectly reasonable for them to display this instead of 'midnight'.
aseerel4c26 (2018-12-13 19:24:31+00:00): Thanks for your understanding, Gergely - and of course the willingness to improve our data!

Because of the local issues it *may* be useful to split up an edit in to regional ones and discuss in a relevant discussion platform of the local community.

I have taken up the wiki issues I identified above:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:opening_hours#is_24:00_an_allowed_time.3F

As mentioned above, could you please contact and discuss with the bot user x5_ru who actively sets the 23:59?

Happy mapping everybody!
Zverik (2018-12-14 13:54:33+00:00): 24:00 is an absolutely valid value for opening_hours tag. Otherwise we'd either have time intervals like 00:00-00:00, or we'd lose a minute with 00:00-23:59. The specification, which has more priority that a textual summary, also allows for 24:00.
Carver Odin (2018-12-15 14:10:39+00:00): Do not listen to aseerel4c26. Anybody with a brain would be able to tell that all your edits were improvements. I will make sure to add all your edits back.
aseerel4c26 (2018-12-16 00:01:36+00:00): Hi Carver Odin, "do not listen to" is not how a community project works. Furthermore it seems that you did not understand the Automated Edits code of conduct. Please read it.
Negreheb (2018-12-18 13:36:32+00:00): I hope you discussed the changes before in the relevant communities, Carver Odin, because it still is a automated edit and could affect a lot that maybe was not intended, as aseerel4c26 very politely explained. GergelySzekely itself says he understood the problem. So please, do not just change that again.
interdite (2019-04-10 18:12:18+00:00): Dear Leif, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=riverbank is not officially discouraged. Have you discussed your mechanical edit?
LeifRasmussen (2019-04-10 19:10:58+00:00): First off, this wasn't really a mechanical edit.  I used the ToDo plugin for JOSM to allow me to paste the tags to each object individually, and I fixed a ton of inaccurate data in the process.  The reason for using the ToDo plugin was that many of the areas (and occasionally non closed ways) were actually lakes, ponds, streams, or basins.  I did not want to mistag anything.
"http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=riverbank is not officially discouraged" - interesting. I had read in some water related wiki page that it was, and for some reason thought that page was official.  I'll try to find it again if someone hasn't changed it.
The reason I have seen for using natural=water + water=river is that there would be fewer tags for data consumers (like Overpass turbo users) and renderers to use: landuse=pond, landuse=basin, landuse=reservoir, waterway=riverbank, and natural=water are all rendered the same way in most maps.
Thanks for contacting me, 
Leif
mueschel (2018-12-13 10:17:12+00:00): Hi,
you added 48 objects with tags like these:

HN_MAX=6.43
HN_P99=5.83
H_DSM_MAX=34.03
H_DSM_P99=33.43
H_DTM_GEM=27.60
H_DTM_MIN=27.40

It looks like these were added by mistake?

Jan
escada (2018-12-14 05:43:23+00:00): thanks for checking this. I removed them
Glassman (2018-12-09 20:38:27+00:00): Nice!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65324161
R0bst3r (2018-12-10 07:36:51+00:00): Hallo Rhabarbara17,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Zur leichteren Verfolgbarkeit deiner Änderungen wäre es wünschenswert, wenn du aussagekräftige Änderungskommentare verwenden würdest, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments. Danke!
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65324658
Rhabarbara17 (2018-12-11 19:02:27+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,
vielen Dank für Deine Prüfung und den Link! Werde hier künftig meine Änderungen klarer benennen. 
Danke und lieben Gruß
pio2_122 (2018-12-09 21:03:59+00:00): Niestety, ale gdzieniegdzie się dublują :/
Przypadkiem zauważyłem dubel adresu Glinna 20A. Pewnie jest tego więcej.
pio2_122 (2018-12-16 13:11:06+00:00): Kolejna sprawa to: http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy
Doszło sporo "mrówek" do poprawy :D

O dziwo brakuje nam teraz starszych adresów np. z 2017 roku.
Jose Luis Infante (2018-12-09 22:21:31+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva contribució.
Segons la normativa catalana (ho consultar l'Optimot) els noms de les vies sempre tenen preposició "de" entre el nom del tipus de via (carrer, avinguda, plaça, etc) i el seu nom propi (plaça de Catalunya), excepte si el nom propi es un adjectiu (carrer Nou).
També pots comprovar que Catastro i ICGC tenen la preposició "de" a aquest carrer.
Salutacions!
Deanna Earley (2018-12-09 21:30:20+00:00): Name taken from Council planning docs:
http://www3.hants.gov.uk/pnadetail?noticeUID=4684
mavl (2018-12-10 16:55:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Сообщите, пожалуйста, источник, которым вы пользуетесь при добавлении адресов.