piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2020-03-29 05:41:39+00:00): You may have made changes, but you still have not replaced the faulty keys. We consider this to be an unauthorized import from an unclear source, which is reversed consequently.

Puede que hayas hecho cambios, pero aún no has reemplazado las llaves defectuosas. Consideramos que se trata de una importación no autorizada procedente de una fuente poco clara, que se revoca en consecuencia.
mueschel (2020-04-06 09:56:17+00:00): I removed these edits for now. Feel free to add these waterways again, after carefully checking the tagging and comparing their geometry to what is visible on aerial images.
StephaneP (2020-03-10 13:58:30+00:00): Bonjour lefebvti,

A la vue de tes contributions, j'imagine que ces ajouts sont faits après une vérification sur le terrain. Dans cette situation, n'hésite pas à indiquer "survey" dans les sources de tes changesets, ça indique que tu es allé sur le terrain.

En tout cas, c'est chouette tout ce que tu ajoutes.

Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
lefebvti (2020-03-10 15:49:04+00:00): merci pour ton message. 
Oui, j'ai fait le décompte dernièrement, et je mettrai "survey" la prochaine fois. 

Tim
user_10813302 (2020-03-12 12:12:54+00:00): These nodes were deleted while trying to upload another changeset, which was having a lot of conflicts, that it wasn't being accepted by the OSM server.

The deleted area was later recreated in changeset: 81915880 with more roads :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81908344
Spring River (2021-03-13 18:50:32+00:00): Hi Joshua,

this changeset looks wrong. You've created many duplicated ways dragged from their original correct position: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=81908400

Best wishes,
Spring River
Jordi MF (2020-03-10 09:26:13+00:00): Hola,

En primer lloc moltes gràcies per millorar les dades d'OSM. Tanmateix, des de la comunitat d'usuaris d'OSM hem detectat un error molt habitual. A l'hora de mapejar places, has utilitzat l'etiqueta leisure=park.  Per a que es considere un parc, la zona ha de ser amb abundant vegetació, habitualment en estat semisilvestre i amb diverses zones d'oci on per exemple es puga fer esport. Aquest és un dels requisits, però un altre és que aquestes zones solen tindre com a nom oficial "Parc de...". No és el cas de les places. Pot consultar la wiki.

Si tens dubtes, pots consultar la comunitat d'usuaris en Telegram. Existeix l'espanyola (@OSMes), la valenciana i la catalana. Alguns contribuïdors estem en les tres. Per favor, si tens algun dubte, uneix-te i planteja el que consideres. La gent estarà encantada d'ajudar.

Salutacions i bon mapeig,
Jordi
abrensch (2020-03-08 09:28:11+00:00): Hallo Lokalfürst,

ich habe diese Ändrungssätze in Wetzlar-Sturzkopf ( 81908959+81908728+81908648+81908551 ) revertiert. Weil da fehlten Teile der K 354

Gruss, Arndt
Lokalfuerst (2020-06-16 06:28:52+00:00): ok, Danke
mapman44 (2020-03-09 20:25:32+00:00): Thanks for your edits but please take note that thousands of orphan nodes (points with no tags) have been brought into the map as a result in your changesets. If these do not have a purpose please delete them. You can view them at http://osmoscope.jochentopf.com/#map=11/-77.22034/21.55176&op=0.82&l=http://area.jochentopf.com/osmm/layers/orphan_nodes.json
user_5359 (2020-03-08 06:00:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
chris2map (2020-04-05 09:04:00+00:00): Hej, greetings!
You can use fire_hydrant instead of hydrant. So they will show up on the map.
mueschel (2020-03-08 14:43:58+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong with the mapillary tag here, could you add the correct one?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/295961856

Thanks!
AdVerburg (2020-03-08 20:18:29+00:00): Done.
Ad
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-07-07 03:54:33+00:00): Halo confía en que lo estás haciendo genial. Encontré el problema del cruce de vías navegables en esta área.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/779178432
¿Le importaría volver a comprobar esta área? será útil. déjeme ahora si hay alguna actualización de datos.
gracias
Tomas Straupis (2020-03-08 08:42:05+00:00): Niekada niekada niekada negalima klausyti, ką iD POI redaktorius meluoja apie „pasenusias“ žymas. Idealiausia būtų apskritai nenaudoti iD, o naudoti normalų redaktorių JOSM.
Wulfmorn (2020-03-09 08:45:51+00:00): De ändringar du har gjort i Ås, Eda kommun måste reverteras. Du har flyttat vägar och byggnader från Lantmäteriets position till Bings position, vilket är fel. Jag har korrigerat hela vägnätet och alla byggnader i Eda efter LM's ortofoto.
Pikse (2025-11-04 10:25:09+00:00): Need on lätikeelsete nimede tõlked, aga ma ei leia eestikeelset allikat, kus selliseid eksonüüme tegelikult kasutatud oleks. Eemaldan need seetõttu.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:48:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
skquinn (2020-08-09 04:40:49+00:00): What is your data source for Shrine in Albuquerque, NM? If a survey, why nothing more specific than shop=yes? Also, where's the address (since the changeset comment refers to adding addresses)?
Russbiggs (2020-08-09 19:41:17+00:00): This was a mistake in the changeset comment which is autosaved from the last changeset in Go Map! The type of shop and the address were not visible at the time of survey as it had recently opened and have blinds drawn.
skquinn (2020-08-10 03:55:24+00:00): OK. Do you know if it's still open? Also, be aware that with only shop=yes, it will not show up in the normal map layer (this is why I  change things from shop=yes to almost anything else, even if not technically correct).
MikeN (2020-03-08 02:46:33+00:00): This one ended up in the parking lot!  Perhaps Gather Greenville should be added as an alternate name to Gather Gvl (which is the  name they go by)?
user_5359 (2020-03-08 05:46:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! May I ask for your support? I assumed, that the both nodes aren't well placed: The church https://www.osm.org/node/356676460 and the types shop https://www.osm.org/node/1860475698. Could you move to the right place (inside of the main building)?
borovac (2022-02-09 08:39:11+00:00): Hi Alex
I came across this road "way/779218337" which is not tagged.
Could you please take a look at what this is about? Is it a ferry route or something else?
Thanks in advance Borovac
FransWillem (2020-09-19 14:39:00+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping.
Please map buildings individual, exluding courtyards, Do not collect a group of buildings and call it 1 building.,
Best regards and keep mapping
joeybab3 (2020-03-30 03:32:09+00:00): Please don’t add arbitrary crossings across live railroad tracks where there are not designated crossings! There is lots of documentation available to show you the correct tagging procedures for railway crossings.
rab (2020-03-08 10:30:58+00:00): Either do it right or don't do it at all.
Imo the only purpose of these map roulette challenge is to hide the Missing Maps crap even deeper.
felipeeugenio (2020-03-08 16:56:51+00:00): Estimado
Muchas gracias por sus ediciones.
Las capitanias no son policias. Ya llevo varias correcciones.

En todo caso muchas gracias y por favor unirse al chat en la descripción de mi perfil si quiere participar en la comunidad Chilena de OSM
rhtb0 (2022-10-29 13:55:07+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지합니다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할겁니다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있습니다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않습니다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있습니다.
abakus_uploader (2020-03-08 23:30:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Supaplex (2020-06-18 14:39:28+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Princeps (2020-04-12 15:57:26+00:00): Для чего вы удалили мною обозначенный пешеходный переход?
neo-plan (2020-04-12 17:34:40+00:00): Наверное, случайно. Извините! Правил карту по собственным точкам из навигатора и, наверное, где-то удалил лишнее. Я даже не знаю как посмотреть теперь где он был...
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 20:33:06+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=russian
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 20:34:26+00:00): I meant 
cuisine=russian;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6565450985/history 

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=russian
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
redd (2022-08-01 07:06:21+00:00): Hi dexgps,
thanks for you contribution to OpenStreetMap. The value for cold_water=cold is funny, but better set just cold_water=yes or cold_water=only to it.
Thanks,
greetings from europe,
redd
mueschel (2020-03-08 10:31:49+00:00): Hi,
please check the Wiki for the correct names of sockets. I just fixed them on 7 charging stations. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket

Thanks!
حبيشان (2020-03-18 09:44:25+00:00): الربع الخالي not only in Suadi Arabia
أبـوعلي (2020-03-18 09:56:53+00:00): Be aware that the special part in Oman and the special part in the Emirates will be added after drawing the sands of Saudi Arabia
حبيشان (2020-03-18 10:06:36+00:00): you may also add part of Yemen. thank you
أبـوعلي (2020-03-18 16:59:51+00:00): off course
Piagno (2020-03-08 08:51:15+00:00): Auch noch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2112573
mueschel (2020-03-11 12:18:02+00:00): Hi,
could you check the name of this POI?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2694594048
Something went wrong with the tag.

Jan
Supaplex (2020-06-18 14:39:55+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Kovoschiz (2020-03-08 15:26:53+00:00): This is implemented incorrectly. Construction features stay `=construction`. Your `note=` does not rectify a `aeroway=runway` from being opened. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81925958
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81918768
skquinn (2020-03-08 12:52:02+00:00): These should be phone not contact:phone
thetornado76 (2020-03-08 18:36:13+00:00): contact:phone is also a valid key
please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact
skquinn (2020-03-08 19:26:58+00:00): It technically is but my understanding is that contact:* is mostly deprecated, and phone has more uses than contact:phone.
DaveF (2020-03-08 13:58:06+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/779270017

There is already a railway station:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3715250479
StuartA1984 (2020-03-08 14:06:15+00:00): this is were the train station building is situated.
DaveF (2020-03-08 14:20:57+00:00): You'll note I amended the building to 'train_station' & removed the duplicating tag.
abakus_uploader (2020-03-08 23:30:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Hjart (2020-06-04 15:40:37+00:00): Please do not split roundabouts
Mazda05 (2020-03-08 15:15:50+00:00): thx
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81919427
BCNorwich (2020-03-09 09:20:25+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There have been many amendments made to most of your changesets. Could you please take a bit of time to consider OSM established practices and adjust your next mapping to suit this.

Regards Bernard.
freeExec (2020-03-10 07:04:12+00:00): То что ты обозначил "жилой улицей" должно быть отмечено как "служебная дорога". А жилая улица - это именно улица с одноимёнными знаками.
Так же шлагбаум - это точечный объект, а у тебя там линия.
eggie (2020-03-08 12:38:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Valkai_S (2020-03-13 06:50:55+00:00): Tegnap voltam ott és akkor vettem észre a változást. Úgy láttam, hogy szerda után nem volt megadva nyitvatartási idő (a Th-Fr...) azt írtam be. A bolt bejárata pont a sarkon van, azért mozgattam oda, meg hogy kissé messzebb kerüljön a szomszédtól, de visszahúzhatom, ha kell.
gabro00 (2020-03-13 08:40:17+00:00): Hétfőtől péntekig volt megadva a nyitvatartás, eltérő szerdai időponttal. Ami mellesleg elfért 33 bájton a mostani 52 helyett, aminek ugyanaz az információtartalma :(

Hacsak nem költöztek odébb, akkor a három ajtó közül a jobb szélső nyílik az üzletbe: https://goo.gl/maps/sqzpxf4mZ4piKwfh9
NyanSten (2020-03-10 01:47:29+00:00): Hi, thanks for all the improvements! Just one note, kerbs are oriented so that the lower part is on the right side of the way. In JOSM, that is the side that arrows point to (you can imagine the arrows as showing the direction water will flow).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb
jmsbert (2020-03-08 17:43:45+00:00): Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe gerade Ihre Änderungen im Bereich Döhlen gesehen. Die von mir eingetragene Wohnstraße (highway=residential; "Ton Barg") und die ersten Hausnummern wurden entfernt? Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass die neuen Häuser bereits wieder abgerissen wurden. Waren Sie vor Ort oder haben Sie sich nur die Infos des Luftbilds (Esri) verwendet? Die in OSM verfügbaren Luftbilder sind eher selten aktuell, sondern teilweise Jahre alt. Zudem ist die Aktualität stark von der Region abhängig. Am besten immer zwischen den verfügbaren Quellen (z.B. Esri, Mapbox, Maxar) hin- und herwechseln, um herauszufinden, was das aktuellste ist. Am besten ist es natürlich vor Ort zu prüfen. Bitte um Rückmeldung, was Quelle für die Änderung war. Vielen Dank im Voraus.
literan (2020-03-16 21:52:14+00:00): результат выглядит неплохо :) теперь хорошо бы проезды нарисовать (а туда вообще свободный доступ?)
Tomas Straupis (2020-03-08 12:05:17+00:00): iD yra LABAI LABAI blogas redaktorius. NIEKADA negalima klausyti ir „taisyti“ (o realiai gadinti) duomenų. Geriausia būtų apskritai nenaudoti šito redaktoriaus, o naudoti normalų - JOSM. Nes dabar man reikia eiti paskui ir viską tvarkyti.
angys (2020-07-09 17:06:35+00:00): SBK Line is subway, not light rail. And now then known as “Kajang Line” and for SSP Line as “Putrajaya Line”, please fix it asap as the relation seems like being affected.
Claudius Henrichs (2020-08-21 19:41:48+00:00): I didn't change any of the subway or light_rail tagging in this changeset, but just unified conflicting network tags between route and route_master relations. 
Looks like you already cleaned up the infrastructure and ways.
user_5359 (2020-03-08 12:43:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description as standard keys, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
Jrachi (2020-04-02 10:55:05+00:00): Ciao.
Vedo che come mappatore novello ti stai dando molto da fare!
Devo però chiederti se hai letto la pagina wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:place=isolated_dwelling
Non è scritto ma è inteso che si tratti di case abitate in permanenza.
A occhio direi che si tratta di alpeggi.
Se sono ancora usati, per gli animali e persone, è preferibile il tag place=farm
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dfarm
Oppure se si tratta di alpeggi abbandonati o comunque con gli edifici abbandonati (semi o interamente crollati) si usa:
place=locality 
Aggiungo ancora che per gli edifici crollati si aggiunge il tag ruins:building=yes.
Ultima nota: stai mappando a memoria gli edifici? O guardi solo le ortofoto?
Perché mi sembra che hai messo building anche a quelli che a me sembrano solo rocce o mucchi di pietre.
Ancora grazie al tempo che dedichi a OSM e spero di sentire  una tua risposta.
Ciao.
Wand04 (2020-04-19 17:58:37+00:00): Ciao Jrachi. 
Scusa per la tarda risposta. 
Grazie per le dritte che mi hai dato. Si sono alle prime armi, quindi i suggerimenti sono benvenuti.
Ho cambiato i tag degli alpeggi in rovina come hai suggerito (ruins:building=yes). Un po' un peccato che pero' ora non vengano renderizzati - sai se si possa fare qualcosa? 
Mappo con Carta Tecnica VdA, ortofoto e un po' di conoscenza locale (diretta o tramandata). 
Ciao.
Jrachi (2020-04-19 18:05:26+00:00): Grazie per la risposta.
Il tempo non ha importanza.
Importante è migliorare la mappa.
Continua così che vai bene!
Jrachi (2020-04-20 19:41:20+00:00): Aggiungo che non tutto ha un rendering.
A me dispiace moltissimo che natural=fell (praterie alpine) n non sono visualizzate!!!
eggie (2020-03-08 13:38:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Wat wat je edit... Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster en als zodanig precies ingemeten. Beter niet wijzigen.
MVG,
Eggie
ff5722 (2020-03-20 18:07:08+00:00): 兰新铁路有什么问题？
berndw (2020-04-19 15:16:55+00:00): Hallo ralfrmobil

Du hast in diesem Changeset ein Gebäude aus zwei Multipolygonen (=Relationen) erstellt.
Sind das wirklich zwei getrennte Häuser?
Anhand der identischen Hausnummer würde ich eher einen Fehler von iD vermuten.
Hier die Links dazu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10799932
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10799933

Für Fragen stehe ich zur Verfügung
Bernd
ralfrmobil (2020-04-19 18:20:31+00:00): Hallo Bernd, 
nein, das ist ein Haus. Habe es selbst die Tage nochmal gesehen als ich wieder dran vorbei bin.
Ich würde es die Tage ändern. 
Gruß
Ralf
Hjart (2020-03-08 20:10:42+00:00): Please do not touch the imported danish adress nodes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-18 12:44:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83739535 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from the local community, reverting some selected mass deletion changesets near Athens.  See comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82728221 et al.
maraf24 (2020-03-10 20:37:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Komentarze_zestawu_zmian
eggie (2020-03-08 14:48:16+00:00): Dag Thijs... Jehebt construction=pedestrian laten staan. dat moet dan ook nog weg. Kijk je nog even?

MVG,
Eggie
user_3216889 (2020-03-09 13:28:59+00:00): Betreffende paden moeten nog op construction blijven staan; nog niet in gebruik i.v.m. bouwwerkzaamheden van o.a. hotel en Merckt.

En waarom 'amenity=community-centre' weggehaald van het Forum?
user_3216889 (2020-03-10 13:57:41+00:00): Ik heb e.e.a. weer aangepast naar oude (actuele) situatie.
XWB (2020-03-08 14:10:06+00:00): The deletion of 313549237 was a mistake. It is a power line. The creator should have labelled it more clearly. How can I revert it?
DaveF (2020-03-08 14:21:07+00:00): It's not a platform.
StuartA1984 (2020-03-08 14:28:13+00:00): Its not a station either. the building is not next to the track. thats why the building was added.This is a Platform area.
DaveF (2020-03-08 14:35:09+00:00): building=train_station is a valid tag to represent station buildings of which the can be many. There can only be one railway=station tag per railway station.

station buildings can be a good distance from where passenger catch a train so should not include railway=station tags..

railway=platform denotes actual platforms as can be seen here.  

It appears you're mistaken & confused by PTv2 schema.
RicoElectrico (2020-03-09 12:28:37+00:00): Cześć, spójrz proszę na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2115217
eggie (2020-03-08 14:51:35+00:00): Hi brbrbbr  Maybe one name will do at one node?
Gr eggie
brbrbr_nl (2020-03-08 15:05:55+00:00): Well yes,

the problem I actually have with this situation is that there is only one campsite on the location. The map suggest otherwise. 
So how to use the tag tourism=camp_site. In these  situation it is uses as a kind of 'land use' not a tourism spot.
eggie (2020-03-08 15:23:14+00:00): Hi.. I think a solution will be to tag at the addressnode at the bureau end remove the tags tourism=camp_site at the seperate fields.
The address is Kampweg 1.
Ik think the info from the Restaurant can be placed at a node without address.
https://www.stortemelk.nl/nl

But the best you can do is asking Jaap de Vries.. He is the former mapper. :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54647133#map=15/53.3006/5.0783

Succes,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-08 15:28:14+00:00): I asked Jaap de Vries to have a look again.
Greetz,
Eggie
jaap de vries (2020-03-09 07:06:58+00:00): Alle kampeerveldjes zijn aangegeven, 1 camping vlak is meer dan voldoende.
All camping fields are indicated, 1 camping surface is more than sufficient.
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-06-23 01:25:59+00:00): Hola, importES
Esta vía fluvial cruza la carretera (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/779306402)(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/809274805). ¿Es esto un túnel?¿O podrías ayudarnos a solucionarlo?
Gracias, feliz mapeo!
(Sorry for my bad spanish. I'm using google translate)