piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jonathan Masur (2018-04-29 10:00:33+00:00): Hello Marc,

C'est intéressant, je pense en effet que je vais annuler le délassement de l'axe Avenue Guiseppe-Motta -> Rue Hoffmann -> Avenue Wendt que j'ai fait, car en effet il semble que la circulation soit favorisée sur ces tronçons.

En revanche, les routes 101, 104, 105, 111, etc... doivent être déclassées car elles ne sont pas "principales" au sens Suisse. Je ne sais pas exactement par où passe la route "1" mais je pense qu'elle s'arrête simplement à l'extrémité nord du Pont du Mont-Blanc; en effet je ne vois pas où d'autre elle peut aller.

On pourrait imaginer la faire suivre l'axe précédemment mentionné et rejoindre l'autoroute (Avenue de la Paix -> Avenue Guiseppe-Motta; Rue Hoffmann; Avenue Wendt; Rue des Charmilles, Rue Sous-Terre, Rue des Deux-Ponts puis Route des Jeunes). Je trouverais ça un peu bizarre cependant.

Salutations.
Marc Mongenet (2018-04-29 17:34:32+00:00): Je n'ai jamais non plus su où la nationale devait officiellement se terminer. Jamais vu non plus de 1 encadré sur un panneau pour m'aider. Mais le "U lacustre" est clairement, et indéfiniment (soit jusqu'à la construction de la rade) la voie la plus importante du centre ville de Genève.
Ce serait dommage de déclasser 105 et 111 pour la continuité avec le réseau français.
Jonathan Masur (2018-04-29 19:26:34+00:00): Hello Marc,
Je croyais que la construction de la rade avait été refusée en votation !?

Dans touts les cas, si ces routes sont effectivement les routes 105 et 111, il ne sera pas possible d'avoir à la fois la continuité avec le réseau français et la cohérence interne du réseau suisse (qui prime à mes yeux).

La route "1" devrait se terminer soit au nord du pont du mont-blanc, soit au carrefour d'où les routes 105 et 102 partent (plus compliqué à réaliser).
Marc Mongenet (2018-04-30 00:02:27+00:00): La traversée a été acceptée en votation. Plusieurs fois même! La dernière en 2016. En revanche les projets concrets sont refusés (la dernière fois en 2014). C'est Genève...
Hem, si ce que tu appelles "cohérence interne du réseau suisse" ne consiste qu'à mapper des documents officiels plus ou moins obsolètes, alors ça contrevient aux objectifs d'OSM, qui est de mapper le terrain (Good practice: Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality).
Jonathan Masur (2018-04-30 20:39:46+00:00): Hello Marc. Merci pour l'info pour la traversée, je suis réellement surpris.

Ton commentaire tombe à pic car c'est précisément ce pouquoi je me permets d'insister pour déclasser les 101, 104, 105, etc.... Les règles sur Suisses sont clairement établies, panneaux blancs=tertiary, panneaux bleus sans numéro => secondary, panneaux bleus avec numéro 1-30 =>primary, ceci est ce qu'on observe sur le terrain (sachant que le numéro peut manquer parfois). 

Apparement les panneaux les plus récents qui viennent d'être posés sur des carrefours qui viennent d'être modifiés indiquent toujours ces numéros (en tout cas dans le canton de Vaud), preuve s'il en est une qu'ils ne sont pas obsolètes.

Je ne connais aucun autre moyen de déterminer la classification dûne route "sur le terrain", de même je ne crois pas que les numéros des routes secondaires (100+ )sont visibles sur le terrain, mais ça c'est un autre problème.
Salutations.
Durko_freemap (2016-06-07 10:42:44+00:00): Ahoj, treba pouzivat diakritiku v zakreslovani, bez diakritiky je to nieco ine. A ten bod Coop Jednota treba zmazat, ked uz su tagy na budove, nech to nieje zbytocne zdvojene. Nazvy ako posta alebo OU radsej nepouzivat, samotny tag amenity uz o tomto hovori.
Durko_freemap (2016-06-07 10:45:44+00:00): zrejme este zmenit building=yes na building=church (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship)
pfg21 (2016-06-20 11:59:09+00:00): highway=residential подразумевает что это жилая улица, т.е. вдоль нее находятся жилые дома, а тут явно такого нет. Прошу вас в дальнейшем быть точнее во внесенной информации.
GinaroZ (2016-06-07 12:31:26+00:00): Hi, what is JMCD?
Alan Bragg (2016-10-02 13:18:48+00:00): Nice job mapping these school grounds. You may be interested in our Massachusetts OSM mailing list.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us-massachusetts
marczoutendijk (2016-06-07 12:39:13+00:00): Heet die bakkerij echt "thuis"??
Lees ook mijn welkomstmail.
BCNorwich (2016-06-07 11:47:11+00:00): Hi, what happens where the cycleway crosses the canal?
dgitto (2016-06-08 21:25:11+00:00): Che vuol dire? C'è qualche errore?
BCNorwich (2016-06-07 11:43:42+00:00): Hi, what happens where the cycleway crosses the canal. Is there a bridge there? If so it would greatly help if it was mapped, (routing would then work).
BCNorwich (2016-06-07 14:09:33+00:00): Hi, on this one the cycleway should have been split and the bridge tag added to the relevant section of way. Otherwise it would be a duplicated way, I've now done this.
Nick-W (2016-06-07 14:15:57+00:00): Its a bit complex - the cycleway is on a ramp and the footway on steps going up in-between. Thanks for straightening out.
user_101460 (2018-01-28 15:21:35+00:00): こんにちは。nogajunと申します。

footwayをエリアとして書かれていますが、footwayはエリアとして書くことはできません。

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:highway%3Dfootway

pedestrianはエリアとして書けますが、航空写真を見る限りは広場のような場所ではないのでここはウェイとして書くべきのように思います。
(yo) (2018-01-29 10:27:20+00:00): 承知しました。該当の歩道エリア部分は既に削除済みですね。
user_101460 (2018-01-29 14:29:43+00:00): ごめんなさい。コメントを書いた後でアップロードをしていた事に気がつきました。すみません。書き直しておきます。
(yo) (2018-01-29 22:06:50+00:00): いえいえ、良い方向に修正してくださったのですから、元に戻さずとも、そのままで結構です。ご指摘有難うございました。
user_101460 (2018-01-29 23:46:31+00:00): ありがとうございます。こちらこぞ気をつけます…
mueschel (2016-06-09 14:09:41+00:00): Hallo,
ein kleiner Hinweis zu Öffnungszeiten: Alles muss in ein einzelnes Tag (habe ich gerade korrigiert), z.B.   opening_hours = Oct-Apr Th-Mo 09:00 - 24:00
Die Korrektheit kann man hier überprüfen lassen:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Oct-Apr%20Th-Mo%2009%3A00%20-%2024%3A00&DATE=1475391660000&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0

Gruß, Jan
BCNorwich (2016-06-07 11:45:22+00:00): Hi, what junction is there where the cycleway twice crosses the footway?
eggie (2017-10-06 12:45:43+00:00): PB met Alsnog welkom bij OSM gestuurd
dpolovinkin (2023-08-08 10:34:59+00:00): hi! 7 years passed since you made a proposed highway feature there and there's still no road as I see, is it worth it to leave this "road" on the map anymore? thx!
Eldarion (2023-08-08 10:45:06+00:00): It is still in the plans and new buildings that are replacing houses along the proposed route are built as if there will be an extension of bulevard of Jaša Tomić to Temerinska street. To be honest, I haven't heard anything about when this will happen, but simillar thing happened with extension of Bate Brkića street - it was mentioned from time to time, nothing happened and than suddenly, one day, the city just announced they are buying houses along the route and soon enough we had a new street. Who knows, maybe the same thing will happen here. The intersection of bulevard of Jaša Tomić and Kisačka had a small (unused) extension as the begining of this new street ever since it was built in the 1960's
Eldarion (2023-08-08 10:54:51+00:00): Here's the link to the plan from 2018 https://www.021.rs/images/b33317072ca38271b86f486f67b44bed/5b7e61e868751-Salajka.jpg
dpolovinkin (2023-08-14 20:45:32+00:00): I see! Thanks a lot for the answer and info! :)
Supaplex (2016-06-07 12:37:06+00:00): 名稱是？
trial (2017-06-10 10:37:03+00:00): la pharmacie Pharmacie Fitoussi n'est-elle pas un doublon avec la pharmacie à deux pas ?
Warin61 (2017-05-18 07:50:16+00:00): Bus Stop Node: 4230081852 is located in the middle of a residential block ... no bus stop there. Moved it to a more appropriate location ... by my physical survey with GPS.
maraf24 (2016-06-08 07:48:35+00:00): Zajazd Wernyhora jest o dwa budynki dalej na prawo.
Poprawiłem.
user_5359 (2016-06-08 06:07:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I merge your double entry of a fuel.
Marko Oivo (2021-09-08 16:02:57+00:00): This business has changed it’s affiliation. It’s current name is OPEX Åland
sorcrosc (2016-06-07 20:03:10+00:00): I corsi d'acqua che hai inserito sono già mappati quindi le tracce che hai inserito vanno rimosse. Puoi farlo tu?
Non è certo una buona pratica inserire cose senza guardare minimamente cosa c'è sotto.
Posso chiederti che finalità ha questa attività del corso?
sorcrosc (2016-06-11 20:54:12+00:00): Visto il silenzio ho eliminato io le due tracce inserite.
Qui c'è la guida di Josm dove è spiegato come scaricare i dati della zona interessata prima di iniziare a fare modifiche:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Guide
Oberaffe (2016-06-07 14:49:13+00:00): Dont add fictional data in the live map!
BCNorwich (2016-06-07 14:19:49+00:00): Sorry but the footway through the woods (Kirkwood NR) at the south west end looks like it starts from the railway line.
maraf24 (2016-06-08 07:22:08+00:00): Proszę nie dopisywać do adresów nieistniejącej nazwy ulicy.
maraf24 (2016-06-26 18:00:17+00:00): Poprawiłem na przystanek.
urzednik (2016-06-26 18:36:28+00:00): ale widoczna jest nadal jako stacja PKP i tak powinno zostac. dlaczego zmieniles na przystanek ? przeciez to stacja kolejowa
maraf24 (2016-06-26 20:12:47+00:00): Na podstawie Wikipedii: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koby%C5%82ka_Oss%C3%B3w
user_5359 (2016-06-08 06:17:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking ?
maraf24 (2016-06-08 07:24:57+00:00): Adresy pochodzą z gorno.e-mapa.net. To serwis gminy.
Proszę sobie tam obejrzeć, jakie są.
krzysmek (2016-06-16 09:36:39+00:00): Jak zmienić dla całego obszaru Cedzyny kod pocztowy? Powinien być 25-351 (https://www.poczta-polska.pl/hermes/uploads/2013/11/spispna.pdf)
maraf24 (2016-06-16 10:11:35+00:00): Najlepiej napisać o tym tutaj http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=22306&p=41
maraf24 (2016-06-16 10:15:19+00:00): Zgłosiłem problem gminie.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-06-10 05:56:45+00:00): Proszę nie grzebać w adresacji bez znajomości tematu. Twoje psucie zostało poprawione, na przyszłość proszę się dokształcić: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
maraf24 (2016-06-26 17:54:54+00:00): Odcinek wiądacy do zabudowań zmieniłem na service.
urzednik (2016-06-26 18:39:44+00:00): czyli odcinek service bedzie jako przejezdny dla nawigacji ?
maraf24 (2016-06-26 20:19:53+00:00): Niektóre nawigacje mogą nie posiadać w swojej bazie w ogóle dróg track. Są jednak i takie, które po tracku poprawadzą.
Service każda powinna obsłużyc, traktując jako drogę dojazdową, nie tranzytową.
Możliwe, że mimo nawierzchni ta droga jest istotna dla mieszkańców i powinna być residential. Trzeba by się ich zapytać:)
user_5359 (2016-06-08 06:19:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3931552300 ? It can be a double entry.
Supaplex (2016-06-08 15:54:01+00:00): 恭喜您透過Maps.Me，完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
apm-wa (2016-06-17 14:52:43+00:00): Today I visited the Turkish construction exhibition in Ashgabat, where Polimeks displayed a scale model of the airport project.  I can send you photos if you are interested.  The design is astounding--a falcon in flight.  Just message me privately with your e-mail address and I'll send them to you.  Your drawing of the Ashgabat air terminal will need a bit of updating :-)
apm-wa (2016-06-17 14:54:38+00:00): Also there is newer imagery for Ashgabat here: http://hiu-maps.net/hot/1.0.0/ashgabat-2015-flipped/%7Bz%7D/%7Bx%7D/%7By%7D.png  Just use it as a Custom Layer.
d1g (2016-06-15 13:38:56+00:00): Please use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing!
MarcRvB (2016-06-07 13:43:58+00:00): Typo
user_5359 (2016-06-08 06:23:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: You forgot to add any information to your node!
RobJN (2016-06-18 11:31:14+00:00): Thanks for the HOT OSM edits and the addition of this church in Coventry. If you need help with anything feel free to contact the local OpenStreetMap community: http://www.mappa-mercia.org/
user_5359 (2016-06-08 06:39:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you need more details for the wedding map: You are welcome!
Commodoortje (2016-06-07 19:31:16+00:00): Volgens mij zit Geert Stevering Ulft op de Hogenkamp 39 en niet op Pavordskamp 24
Inmiddels heb ik de node verhuist.
user_5359 (2016-06-07 17:27:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! I habe delete your "School way" and way 423426292. Please be care full with your modification. This is a production database not a playground or testing database.
user_5359 (2016-06-09 05:00:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
JBacc1 (2016-06-19 14:25:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Un dégât sur le mp de prairie 1065964. J'essaye de réparer sans toucher au reste.
JB
ediyes (2016-06-09 15:07:36+00:00): Hi,
On this changeset there were two roads mapped , what did you do?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11787643/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423428086/history
user_5359 (2016-06-08 06:28:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you paint a other highway over existing highways? I have delete this way part. I will checked the other entries of you later.

If you want to paint the way of a bus, there exists an other construct (called relation not really a beginner work). If you need help: you are welcome.
ediyes (2016-06-09 15:16:35+00:00): Hello,

The same in this case there were two roads mapped , what happened?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423428780/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11786636/history
dudka (2016-08-01 08:22:06+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423430884

на аерофото не видно стадіону в цьому місці, що ви хотіли позначити?
Chieftl (2016-08-03 09:04:46+00:00): звісно, його ще не видно, бо 2 місяці тому тільки закінчували монтувати це футбольне поле :)
чи ви мали на увазі, що краще позначати як pitch, а не stadium?
dudka (2016-08-03 09:12:25+00:00): Ок, я подумав, що це помилково нанесено.

Так, якщо це просто майданчик для гри у футбол, а не стадіон, то pitch більше підходить
user_5359 (2016-06-07 17:17:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: Don't add any name only information. And in this special case don't any private route information to OSM!!
user_5359 (2016-06-07 17:18:09+00:00): The was was deleted by me!
ediyes (2016-07-22 23:10:40+00:00): Hi there!!

I didn't add street's name, I saw that the name was added by Mark Hair(http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/user_5359). Check the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39846014
aTarom (2022-06-22 17:48:03+00:00): Hi dudone I know it was 6 long years ago, just for curiosity the way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423431246/history
wall=e :D
could be something like wall=""earth"" or "dry_stone"
or a simple mistake.
Cheers.
dudone (2022-07-05 17:31:57+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  I have changed this to "dry_stone" which is the most likely tag.
Dudley
naoliv (2016-06-07 21:59:34+00:00): Luis Gustavo, você está quebrando os limites das cidades.
luisgustavo1968 (2016-06-08 00:53:43+00:00): OK

 Corrigido limites de Campo Largo
naoliv (2016-06-08 12:25:19+00:00): Obrigado.
chnav (2016-06-08 08:02:54+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте в названия статусные части как "магазин", "заправка" и т.д. это и так понятно по иконке и тегам. Также в названиях нежелательно использовать кавычки. Длинное описание салона ВИРАЖ я убрал в description.
Tomas Straupis (2016-06-07 19:02:51+00:00): IKI jau buvo pažymėta ant pastato, todėl įvestą perteklinį tašką panaikinau.
user_5359 (2016-06-09 05:51:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
mavl (2016-06-15 14:52:33+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этих дорог нет на спутниковых снимках. Объясните, пожалуйста, свои действия.
user_5359 (2016-06-07 18:25:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Can you please move the node to a building? Or add the full address to the node.
KoraxDC (2016-06-17 11:19:41+00:00): Аналогично велодорожке. Path это тропинка. В парке вполне приличные мощеные дорожки, которые отмечаются как footway.
KoraxDC (2016-06-20 09:30:12+00:00): Без ответа. Откатываю.
KoraxDC (2016-06-17 10:52:06+00:00): А по какой причине тип дорожки изменен, тем более на path? Это асфальтированная велодорожка, обозначенная знаками и разметкой, а не стихийная тропа.
Описание тега:
"В российской практике использование highway=path сводится к обозначению стихийных пешеходных троп, троп, используемых для передвижения на лыжах, велосипеде, лошадях. Дорожки, которые предназначены для перемещения пешком, на велосипеде или на лошади, а значит, не являющиеся стихийными, следует обозначать тэгами highway=footway, highway=cycleway и highway=bridleway."
KoraxDC (2016-06-20 09:30:24+00:00): Без ответа. Откатываю.
naoliv (2016-06-07 21:56:40+00:00): Gilmar, você deslocou uma parte da cidade mas geralmente isso não é uma coisa correta de se fazer, já que as imagens do Bing sempre apresentam um deslocamento a cada atualização.
O mais correto nesses casos, quando há dúvida, é deslocar a imagem de fundo, para que ela se ajuste aos objetos existentes no mapa.
chnav (2016-06-08 08:08:36+00:00): Пожалуйста обозначайте магазины соответствующими тегами и НЕ УДАЛЯЙТЕ тег building.
chnav (2016-06-08 08:10:18+00:00): Если здание жилое, то магазины обозначаются одной точкой т.к. он не занимает всё здание.
demon_box (2016-06-07 20:30:50+00:00): ciao, non sono guadi inesistenti ma incroci del sentiero con corsi d'acqua intermittenti e NON sono da cancellare. (leggi per cortesia anche i miei 2 messaggi che ti ho mandato a proposito). fammi sapere, grazie
Robert Whittaker (2016-06-16 12:08:03+00:00): I see you've tagged http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423458145 as "Fritton and St Olaves FP 1", but according to the Statements I have at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/norfolk/great-yarmouth.pdf it should be "Old Parish of Herringfleet FP 1".

However, those statements are potentially out of date, so perhaps you have more recent copy?
BCNorwich (2016-06-19 05:37:06+00:00): I used the name that I would use today to describe the path, it is FP 1 in the parish of Fritton and St Olaves. That path is now in Norfolk in the parish of Fritton and St Olaves. The parish of Herringfleet does not now exist in Norfolk even in part, the part that was in Norfolk is now called Fritton and St Olaves CP. The part of the original parish of Herringfleet that is now in Suffolk is today called Somerleyton, Asby and Herringfleet CP. The NCC interactive map states the path as "Name : Old Parish of Herringfleet FP1  Parish : FRITTON AND ST OLAVES".

The statement accompanying the definitive map has no legal status anyway so would not be changed by NCC. It is only the legal document (the Definitive Map) that NCC would change and then only in what is termed as a legal event (the legal event is sometimes enacted years after the physical event).

A compromise could be to name the way whatever you choose and place a note in the database (on the way) to describe the anomaly, in case anyone else like me sees the discrepancy.
Robert Whittaker (2016-06-19 07:38:22+00:00): I think you're mistaken here. The Definitive Statement is a legal document, and forms part of teh "Definitive Map and Statement" that surveying authorities are required to maintain. Moreover, the online map is not the Definitive Map (it's just a working copy), so the reference to the current parish there is not a legal one.

While the Right of Way may well be located in a different parish now, I don't think that has any effect on the legal identifier/name unless the Definitive Map and Statement have been legally modified.

So for OSM, I think we should use the prow_ref as specified by the Definitive Statement. This is certainly not the only case of a RoW now being located in a different parish from that suggested by its identifier. While changing the parish name works in this case, in other cases there could well already be a RoW with the same number in the current parish.
Luis36995 (2016-12-06 15:14:21+00:00): Delete highway - Reverse change 39867873
Владимир К (2016-06-10 05:19:18+00:00): Извините, что это значит?
GinaroZ (2016-06-08 11:03:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding to the map. Just to let you know that amenity=shop is deprecated - shop=* should be used instead. Probably shop=clothes for a kilt shop
muralito (2016-06-09 00:27:32+00:00): Mario, ¿el hotel que agregaste es distinto del que aparece a unos 30-40 metros? ¿se llaman casi igual?
Marych_ (2016-06-12 12:33:53+00:00): внес острова в отношение
должны нарисоваться
opendcc (2016-06-07 19:41:54+00:00): Hallo,

bei der Brigde in Ebersberg: access=no bedeutet komplett gesperrt, auch für Fußgänger usw. Ist das so?
drlellinger (2016-06-07 19:42:49+00:00): Ja, weil wegen Baufälligkeit komplett gesperrt
opendcc (2016-06-07 19:54:00+00:00): Hallo,

dann ist es gut, wenn man da eine note hinzufügt. Ich habe das mal bei der Brücke gemacht. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39870098
user_5359 (2016-06-09 11:36:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Юрий Емельянов (2016-06-09 13:08:32+00:00): Улица котельная
spocket (2016-06-07 20:56:53+00:00): wrong change description: I changed a relation of a hiking way that was extended (seen some new signs)
zarl (2016-07-28 12:13:52+00:00): Hallo Seandebasti,

du hast hier u.a. einen Spielplatz als POI eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4230904226 Nur gab es an der Stelle bereits einen als Fläche eingetragenen Spielplatz. Köntest du da bitte etwas genauer darauf achten, dass du keine Dubletten anlegst? 

Bitte lösche doch deinen Punkt wieder, oder habe ich irgendwas übersehen?

Gruss,
Zarl
Seandebasti (2016-07-28 17:20:13+00:00): hey zarl, hate schon nen grund, wollte die installation nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:playground hinzufügen und vergessen. danke für die erinnerung
zarl (2016-07-30 08:24:28+00:00): Guter Vorsatz! Schön gemappte Spielplätze machen immer was her, auch wenn ich mich frage, wieviele Kinder davon profitieren... ;-)

Viel Spass beim Mappen!
mavl (2019-03-23 17:00:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 17:00:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 17:00:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 17:00:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 17:00:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 17:00:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 17:00:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 17:00:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 17:00:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 17:01:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Skippern (2016-06-10 19:56:47+00:00): Voce vai completar com relações quando abrem oficialmente?
Nighto (2016-06-10 20:00:46+00:00): Sim :) Por enquanto acho que não vale a pena, porque vai mudar toda semana.
Skippern (2016-06-10 20:11:17+00:00): Espero que eles vai fazer mais linhas no futuro também, alem do 3a linha que eles informar como "extensão futuro", mas o interligação do Metro la no Cinelândia fui ótimo!
Nighto (2016-06-10 20:16:07+00:00): Sim :) Por enquanto somente um trecho da Linha 1 está em funcionamento, e somente em um horário limitado. Semana que vem já aumenta 2h (de 12:00-15:00 para 11:00-16:00) e uma estação a mais (Parada dos Navios).
Skippern (2016-06-10 20:23:15+00:00): Ja peguei trecho Aeroporto - Parada dos Museu, e andou ate Rodoviaria, porra o area do porto mudou bastante depois eles derrubou o permietral
Nighto (2016-06-10 20:24:18+00:00): Totalmente! A diferença é brutal!