piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
poornibadrinath (2017-01-18 05:27:15+00:00): Hi Bahromigamberdiev, 
  I came across your edits and noticed you have added around 80 hospitals in the neighbourhood and named it like Sam.Kush.Mayintepa KVP3 which sounds invalid. Clearly 80 hospitals is a large number, also these names are not acceptable. It would be great if you could explain why you added so many hospitals with such names. Also, please revert the changeset or delete the unwanted features. 

Best,
Poornima Badrinath
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:44:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
PT-53 (2017-01-17 16:35:31+00:00): Hallo jamos15,
Du hast einen neuen POI für das Käseparadies angelegt, obwohl bereits ein entspr. POI vorhanden war. Außerdem hast Du den neuen POI in das Gebäude Mühltorstraße 4 statt in das Gebäude Schmale Gasse 4 platziert.
Ich habe Deine POI-Daten auf den bestehenden POI übertragen und Deinen POI wieder gelöscht.
Grüße
jamos15 (2017-01-17 19:03:33+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.
Hab anscheinend die Karte falsch herum interpretiert.
Grüße, jamos
Hjart (2017-01-17 14:06:34+00:00): Hvad er formålet med disse tags?
Bemærk at jeg før jul har brugt det meste af en uges tid på at rette stort set alt hvad du har lavet på Nordfyn idet hovedparten var deciderede fejl.
Nordfyns Kommune (2017-01-18 07:25:46+00:00): Hej Hjart

Det er da noget rod, hvis vores tilføjelser til OSM er forkerte. Det er bestemt ikke formål med vores bidrag.

Formålet vores bidrag er at kommunalside at klassifere samtlige stier i Nordfyns kommune i forhold til den officielle landsdækkende standard for stiklassifisering kaldet SAMKOM:
Læs mere her: http://vejdirektoratet.dk/DA/vejsektor/samarbejde/kommuner/samkom/Documents/stiklassificering.pdf

Kan du udpege mere konkret, hvilken fejl der er tale om så vi få rettet op på det ?
Nordfyns Kommune (2017-01-18 07:44:08+00:00): Samkom tag'et er dokumenteret her:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/samkom_tag
Hjart (2017-01-18 10:08:55+00:00): Tak. Jeg skal lige have lidt tid til at sætte mig ind i dokumentet.
Indtil videre bør det bemærkes at OSM er et internationalt projekt der også her i landet i store træk har udviklet sig uafhængigt af officielle data og at terminologier og klassifikationer fra de officielle systemer i en del tilfælde ikke vil kunne overføres direkte til OSM.
Bemærk specielt at langt de fleste af os der jævnligt (eller næsten dagligt) redigerer OSM kun i begrænset omfang (primært for at tjekke navne) skeler til de officielle data.
Som et eksempel på en decideret fejl du har lavet kan tages http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158210721/history. Her har  du omklassificeret en skovvej (highway=track) til sti og yderligere tilføjet en række tags der dels ikke giver mening for en skovvej og dels er overflødige i forhold til normale OSM konventioner. I går i Otterup lagde du en sti ovenpå en eksisterende highway=track http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111829494 (som efter min vurdering retteligt bør tagges således) . Det går heller ikke.
Jeg havde desværre ikke i første omgang tid til at tjekke hvad du lavede, men da jeg først fik set nærmere på det og kunne konstatere at du stadig ikke havde svaret på vores oprindelige henvendelse, besluttede jeg mig til blot at gennemgå det hele og endte med praktisk taget at revertere hovedparten.
Nordfyns Kommune (2017-01-18 10:44:59+00:00): Hej Hjart

Tak for din hurtige tilbagemelding.
Det er beklageligt vi har indlagt dubletter og lavet forkerte omklassificeringer.

Vi ønsker på ingen måde at tilrettet i en forkert retning, men ser et potentielle og en synergi I at bruge OSM som datakilder og vedligeholde/klassificere kommunens stier på OSM, frem og gøre det i en lokalt GIS-tema.

Vi vil gennemgå vores rettelser og vil formodentlig tilføje SAMKOM-taget til en række veje og stier. Samkom tag'et kan principielt bliver brug på landsplan af alle danske kommuner. Kan vi gøre noget for at sikre beritigelsen af SAMKOM tag'et, ud over at dokumenteret på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/samkom_tag ?
Vi håber communitiet vil acceptere dette tag :-)
Hjart (2017-01-23 11:53:12+00:00): Jeg kan naturligvis også se et potentiale i et samarbejde mellem alle os amatører i OSM og det offentlige.
Min erfaring indtil videre er dog at kommunale aktører og lign uden dybere forståelse for OSM's baggrund og ånd mm, på kort tid (fordi de i modsætning til de fleste amatører gør det på fuld tid) kan skabe en masse ravage og flere gange nu har sendt mig (fordi det primært er mig der har den nødvendige ekspertise og tid vel at mærke) på overarbejde med oprydning.
Jeg faldt lige over dette meget passende blogindlæg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/RAytoun/diary/40266 (bemærk specielt de sidste sætninger).
Indtil videre vil jeg anbefale at folk der har planer om projekter i stil med jeres i første omgang deltager i projektet på lige fod med os andre ved at redigere mindre lokale ting, som f.eks. forretninger, bygninger, søer, stier, seværdigheder osv.
Jeg vil også anbefale at i præsenterer jeres projekt og tanker på vores postliste (se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:WikiProject_Denmark#Kontakt).
Jeg tror ikke umiddelbart at nogen af os har været opmærksom på det der forslag til nyt tag, da de fleste kun lejlighedsvist følger med her.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:44:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Commodoortje (2017-01-17 14:52:38+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Commodoortje (2017-01-17 18:37:46+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Владимир К (2017-01-17 13:35:50+00:00): а зачем второй контур лосефермы? почему старый не растянуть?
FahRadler (2017-01-19 14:43:17+00:00): Hallo

in diesem Änderungvorgang hast du einen Pfad
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

zu einem Fußweg 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
gemacht.
Wenn du dir die Definition im Wiki ansiehst, wirst du feststellen dass deine Änderung falsch war.
Außerdem hast du ein Naturdenkmal (Baum) vom Bahnhofgelände mitten in die Industriestraße verschoben - das war wahrscheinlich nicht beabsichtigt.
Ich werde daher deine Änderungen rückgängig machen.
Bitte beachte zukünftig die Definitionen der Elemente im Wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features

Fahradler
FahRadler (2017-01-19 14:26:53+00:00): Wilkommen bei OSM.
Toll dass du an der Verbessung der OSM-Map mitarbeiten willst.
Du hast mit deiner Änderung einen 1,8km !!!! langen Fußweg eingetragen (Höhe Feldstraße bis Hahnenklamm)
Das war sicher nicht beabsichtigt - auf dieser Länge existiert er nicht.
Ich habe deine Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht.
Achte bitte zukünfig auf die Elemente die du änderst - und am besten kontrolliere später die Darstellung in der Karte.

Have Fun

FahRadler
user_5359 (2017-01-17 17:27:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr , too. If you need help, You are welcome.
SK53 (2017-01-19 15:02:20+00:00): Are you sure about http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4020491191. Just checking my photos from Feb 2016 & I think this is a stile adjacent to a gate.
dudone (2017-01-19 20:14:35+00:00): Hi Jerry

Well spotted.  If I'm not sure I will use entrance.  I have always assumed that if you have a barrier with out an entrance, gate, still etc routing wouldn't work so this is my default.   Having checked my pictures I have one looking back at this.  As you suggest it is a stile and a gate.  I have corrected this.

Regards

Dudley
SK53 (2017-01-19 20:29:55+00:00): Realised that I had not added hedges etc from visit in Feb 2016, so was following that route. I agree entrance is good practice and helps to encourage checking of gates etc in the field.

Overall we seem to have made a very satisfactory impact on mapping this area. I'm continuing to add field boundaries etc towards Long Clawson based on photos taken from the road & earlier walks.

Jerry
EugenyN (2017-01-17 16:48:08+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вы создали дубликат здания.  нужно было просто исправить номер у существующего здания.  дубликат нужно удалить.  дубликат - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466653938  существующее здание - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53018383
EugenyN (2017-01-17 16:48:36+00:00): по любым вопросам обращайтесь!
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
stillhart (2023-11-19 10:35:25+00:00): Lange ist es her, nur so nebenbei:
Dietfurt ist ein eigenes Dorf mit eigener Postleitzahl. Das Dorf hat etwas darunter gelitten, dass nun in vielen Apps die Adressen falsch waren. Dies ist speziell schlimm weil gewissen Strassennamen und Nummern mit Bütschwil überlappen.
stillhart (2023-11-19 10:38:02+00:00): Keine Ahnung wie gut die Website ist, aber das Stimmt ziemlich genau nach meinem Gefühl:
https://www.plz-suche.org/ch/plz/9615
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:44:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
mavl (2020-03-29 12:05:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
mavl (2020-03-29 12:06:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
mxrev8 (2017-04-03 11:46:30+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
Commodoortje (2017-01-17 18:38:10+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Rainero (2017-01-21 22:03:38+00:00): Hallo Zhao,

ich stolpere gerade über eine JOSM-Fehlermeldung: es gibt 3 Relationen (Nr. 6789632, 6789633 und 6789634), jeweils sind Die buslinien 192 und/oder 194 sowie die Haltestelle Hochacker Elemente der Relation ohne eine Rolle.
Ich nehme an, das ist ein Unfall beim Editieren.
Desweiteren sehe ich mehrfache Relationen der Buslinien 139, 192, 194 und N79. Vermutlich hast du zum Bearbeiten Kopien der Relationen angelegt und die dann alle hochgeladen.

Wenn du in JOSM vor dem Hochladen die Prüfung laufen läßt, solltest du diese Fehler angezeigt bekommen.

Würdest du das bitte prüfen und korrigieren?

Servus,
Rainer
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
user_5359 (2017-01-17 17:26:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the footway. I can see the way on the aerial images of BING!
iMarbot (2017-01-26 21:09:50+00:00): Not again... We had someone delete these before too...
user_5359 (2017-01-26 21:12:45+00:00): Can I help? Should I revert this changeset?
iMarbot (2017-01-26 21:52:41+00:00): Didn't expect someone to reply this fast, already reverted it. Thanks anyway!
iMarbot (2017-01-26 21:58:26+00:00): Some proof it exists: http://imgur.com/sFSB3bf
mavl (2020-03-29 12:06:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
mavl (2020-03-29 12:06:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
chillly (2017-01-17 15:25:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail.  Somehow you seem to have added a second house over the top of the first. If you need any help sorting this out please feel free to ask.
manoharuss (2017-01-18 05:21:22+00:00): Hi Andrey Steklo,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But you have given the whole address in the addr:street tag which I corrected here http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4614154594.


best,

Manohar
Hjart (2017-01-17 16:26:10+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Jeg tænkte lige på om du ikke kunne kigge på stavemåden på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination tags på de forskellige veje i det her område: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ljd ?
aceman444 (2019-05-12 21:44:52+00:00): Dobry den, prosim rozlisujte autobusovu stanicu a autobusovu zastavku. Myslim, ze vsetky tieto dedinske zastavky su len zastavky :)
aceman444 (2019-05-12 21:45:52+00:00): Alebo podla coho ste ich urcili Vy?
Lieby Cardoso (2017-01-17 16:28:22+00:00): Added buildings and a residential road
PT-53 (2017-01-17 16:49:57+00:00): Hallo deprado63,
für die korrekte Eintragung von WLAN-Zugängen lies dir bitte mal dieses Wiki dazu durch: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:internet_access
Past Du Deinen Eintrag noch entspr. an ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-01-18 08:42:42+00:00): Hallo deprado63, Du hasz jetzt den Eintrag description=Freies WLan vorhanden in WLAN=Freies WLAN geändert. Hast Du das Wiki nicht gelesen ? Der richtige Eintrag ist internet_access=wlan ! Ich habe das jetzt so geändert.
Bitte verwende künftig die richtigen Einträge und die richtige Schreibweise!
tyr_asd (2017-01-21 16:36:37+00:00): Hi ET90!

Why did you remove all these names from roads in the industrial area "Bolzano Sud"? It looks like a mistake to me. I will restore the names for now. Can you please explain what you wanted to do here? I think we can give you a helping hand. :)
ET90 (2017-01-22 10:47:42+00:00): I was convinced that by clicking "save" I created my own database with maps. When I realized that I would have changed the map for other users I have tried to restore the previous version. Very sorry for this inconvenience. I just need a map with no writing. I 'the first time on this site and did not know how to contact an admin
tyr_asd (2017-01-22 15:48:42+00:00): Hi. No worries!

To your question: If you need a custom map style (e.g. one without road names), you should look at one of the many options to render your own map from OpenStreetMap data. Depending on what you need a map for, different tools or services can do the trick. For example "Maperitive" is relatively easy to use and produces static png maps as output, or you can look at what mapbox.com has to offer for your use-case. Here's a related page on the osm wiki with more information: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rendering
Commodoortje (2017-01-17 18:58:16+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Lieby Cardoso (2017-01-17 16:27:53+00:00): Added buildings and a residential road
Stereo (2017-01-17 18:11:11+00:00): Hello,

Have you seen that the 2016 imagery is now available under 'geoportail.lu' in the Imagery menu?

Happy mapping,

Guillaume
Frédéric Gutkin (2017-01-17 22:04:51+00:00): Hello Guillaume,
Thank you very much for your advice.
From now on, I will use this layer for mapping...
Best regards,
Frédéric
Lieby Cardoso (2017-01-17 16:27:13+00:00): Added buildings and a residential road
Lieby Cardoso (2017-01-17 16:25:47+00:00): added buildings
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:25:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
poornibadrinath (2017-01-18 06:10:29+00:00): Hi Martin Muszio,
 I came across your edits and noticed you have changed the tag of a highway from primary to track. Can you please explain the need of this change? This comes across as a road which is long route, as a connect between two neighbouring villages or towns, in which case this is a major road. Please explain this change or revert this back to primary. 

Best,
Poornima Badrinath
Martin Muszio (2017-01-18 13:54:32+00:00): Hi Poornima Badrinath, Indeed, as you commented it is an important road, what happens is that it is not paved, how can I leave it as an important but unpaved road?
Sorry if I do not understand what I'm trying to say, I do not handle English very well.
poornibadrinath (2017-01-19 05:13:38+00:00): Hi Martin,
 Yes I understand what you are trying to say here. All I am saying if the road is unpaved or we are unsure then would be better to mark it as unclassified instead of track. Because track becomes a minor road and if the particular road is connecting two towns or villages or places for that matter, it wont come as a track. 

Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
AgusQui (2017-01-20 00:13:09+00:00): Martín, la comunidad argentina ha convenido que las rutas provinciales van con highway=primary sin importar si están pavimentadas o no, yo no estoy muy de acuerdo con esto pero hay que respetarlo. Si te interesa discutir sobre este tema o dejar tu opinión, acá te dejo el link al foro: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=25490. Acá está la wiki Argentina: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Argentina, donde también encontrarás los medios de contacto con el resto de la comunidad si querés sacarte dudas. 
Saludos, Agustín.
Martin Muszio (2017-01-20 18:05:09+00:00): Agustín un gusto! a ver si entiendo... como los mapas dicen que es ruta 10, hay q ponerla como primaria? pese a que es un camino de tierra en estado nefasto? maps.me y/u ost maps van las usan como si fuesen asfaltadas...