piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2022-01-05 15:07:35+00:00): Hi

Can I ask... what is it with German mappers to make a few changes in Germany and add one more in Greece or Turkey? Every time you make everyone see these change sets in the local history view where they stay for days. Just cant comprehend the combination of bus stops and a building in Turkey and I do know nearby Antalya, but only by name of a great restaurant in Nuenburg am Rhein.

ciao from Italy.
bubeck (2022-01-05 15:24:06+00:00): Sorry. I am on vacation in turkey and make changes to turkey. However, as my friend lives in weilen unter den rinnen I made changes there too. They went in the same changeset which probably is not a good idea. Sorry for that.
sheldonelectric (2026-04-20 16:23:20+00:00): Bon dia, what is the source for the catalan names?
jmaspons (2026-06-15 17:00:36+00:00): Mostly wikidata
Carnildo (2022-01-06 02:50:57+00:00): That's a *former* golf course.  It shut down years ago, and there are currently plans to convert the land into a residential development.
wille (2022-01-06 12:45:04+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115798621
Matt McCutchen (2022-01-05 13:52:44+00:00): Source is survey.  I guess I'll avoid submitting changesets with OsmAnd unless/until it gains support for specifying the "source" tag.
Matt McCutchen (2022-01-05 13:56:43+00:00): Oops, somehow most of the tags I intended to add didn't get added.  Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115798909.
wille (2022-01-06 12:42:15+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está quase tudo correto! Nós alinhamos os edifícios pela base não pelo topo. Dessa forma, a localização é mais correta.

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115798735
linerider (2022-01-05 22:46:22+00:00): I noticed that dunes in this area are no longer rendered green but grey. The osm wiki says this: "dunes that are mostly covered by vegetation like grass or heath and are therefore no more moving and changing shape like an active dune - use natural=heath or natural=grassland instead."
I think that all these dunes are covered by beach grass, so natural=grassland should be more appropriate, don't you think?
marczoutendijk (2022-01-06 08:10:47+00:00): Indeed, it’s better to change that. Will you do it? I changed it because landuse=dune isn’t valid anyway.
MarcoR (2022-01-06 11:02:19+00:00): Ciao!
Hai spostato e poi cancellato la località di Balsignano (credo per errore). Ho provveduto a ripristinarla.

Fammi sapere se, al contrario, avevi volutamente rimosso Balsignano perché non più esistente (o per altro motivo).

P.S. io non sono del posto

A presto,
Marco
StefanHRT (2022-01-05 14:12:17+00:00): Hallo,
Du legst hier Wege an, welche nur unter einander routingfähig sind. Zusätzlich glaube ich nicht, das die Wege auf dem Schulgelände für alle frei zum Radfahren sind (path beinhaltet automatisch eine Radfreigabe). Da in der Gegend alle Wege mit einer generellen Radfreigabe gemappt sind, wären Fußwege obendrein angebrachter *zwinker* VG
user_14771166 (2022-01-05 15:32:24+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, Stefan. Habe Fußwege daraus gemacht.
Da die Wege innerhalb eines Schulgeländes liegen, wäre eine Routinganbindung an öffentliche Straßen für mich nicht schlüssig. VG
StefanHRT (2022-01-05 15:41:52+00:00): Danke fürs ändern. Naja, Routinganbindung insofern da es ja z.B. auch mal Elternabende und Schulveranstaltungen gibt und wer weis wievieleSchüler mittlerweile auch immer Router nutzen ;)
Gopnik McBlyat (2022-01-05 15:00:17+00:00): Hoi Marc,
is leisure=park still relevant on this way?
marczoutendijk (2022-01-05 15:08:53+00:00): The original mapper has added that 5 years ago. To me that part of the ZOO doesn't really look like a park. As a matter of fact, it is included in the larger leisure=park for the whole of the ZOO.
I shall remove it! 
Thanks for pointing this out.
GerdP (2024-10-21 05:32:26+00:00): Moin!
Ist dieser Geh+Radweg https://www.osm.org/way/226315279 an der B214
wirklich nur geschottert? Am Bahnhof in Steinfeld sah das für mich nach Asphalt aus, habe aber auch nicht genau drauf geachtet. Tippfehler?
stinkmoloch (2024-10-22 16:03:33+00:00): Moin,
Ich glaube du hast Recht mit dem Asphalt, so aus meiner Erinnerung heraus. Leider kommt ich nicht mehr in die "Ecke" um das zu überprüfen. 
Tippfehler passieren schnell bei StreetComplete
GerdP (2024-10-22 17:45:30+00:00): Ich werde da vermutlich auch nicht so bald wieder vorbeikommen. Ich schlage vor, es auf paved zu ändern, das ist zu 99.9 % richtig.
skorpion62 (2024-10-24 07:23:52+00:00): Hallo Gerd,
der Geh- und Radweg ist asphaltiert. Ich fahre diese Strecke des Öfteren von Bersenbrück nach Diepholz.
Ich korrigiere das gleich mal.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Viele Grüße
skorpion62
GerdP (2024-10-24 07:28:49+00:00): Prima, Danke!
parsd51 (2022-01-05 21:36:33+00:00): Hvordan kan det være du har slettet den nye vej og stiforbindelse, der er lavet survey på?
Jeg synes det underbygges af lokalplan LK72.
osmviborg (2022-01-06 05:37:56+00:00): Revertet
parsd51 (2022-01-06 12:31:58+00:00): Tak. Dine andre rettelser og optimeringer i CS var nok i orden og behøvede ikke revert.
BladeofDarken (2022-01-06 07:49:28+00:00): Hello! Thank you so much for your contributions to the layout of Temple City High School. We are students from the school who created a map for the students to navigate our campus. Unfortunately, though the changes you made followed satellite routing, they are not accurate for our school, thus we will be reverting the changes back. Thank you so much for your help and understanding, we really appreciate your continued contributions to openstreetmaps.
egordobatovkin (2022-01-06 13:17:03+00:00): Hello! Thank you for help, and sorry for interrupting your campus mapping. You see, decision about remapping has been made because of inappropriate roads tagging. Thus if you revert changes - consider appropriate OSM tagging of foot paths, service roads, etc. Thanks for your understanding!
eggie (2022-01-05 18:12:49+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. De bedrijfsinfo heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande BAG adresnode. Adressen horen uniek te zijn.
MVG
eggie
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:44:52+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import by OEG, possibly using unauthorised data sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522524
user_5359 (2022-01-06 13:03:16+00:00): Hello! What ist the meaning of the key addr_sname?
julius ivan26 (2022-01-07 11:27:47+00:00): Hi, 
The addr_sname is for sub-county names (an administrative level in Uganda ), Since it is not a requirement, let me modify it. 
Thank you
user_5359 (2022-01-12 11:55:29+00:00): Sorry for the longer response time. The prefix addr: stands for the notation of an address. The genres of countries and their detailed areas are usually entered as a relation with boundary=administrative and admin_level=[2,12]. 
I do not know the current registration situation in Uganda, but this seems to me to be a wrong notation and also not suitable for the actual information.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-05 15:16:31+00:00): Hi Omarsoukane,
Can you pay a little more attention to your changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Just using "all" isn't very helpful to other mappers.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Leo Slager (2022-01-06 11:21:29+00:00): Dat is helaas helemaal fout gegaan.
De editor iD kan helaas niet omgaan met routerelaties.
Alle wegen die je hebt toegevoegd staan altijd achteraan in de relatie. En dus is de route onderbroken omdat de wegen niet in de juiste volgorde staan. Ook de oude haltes staan nog in de relatie en dat leidt allemaal tot foutmeldingen.
Als je serieus met routerelaties wilt gaan werken dan adviseer ik je dringend om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM. Daarmee kun je routerelaties wel goed bewerken en alles in de juiste volgorde zetten.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
Leo Slager (2022-01-06 12:00:33+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=5.99265&lat=50.89224&zoom=12&opacity=0.82&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes

Als onervaren mapper vooral niet gaan wijzigen aan routerelaties !!
Vraag hulp op het forum of zet een opmerking op de kaart. Een andere, ervaren mapper kan dan de wijziging op correcte wijze uitvoeren.
En met de editor iD gaat dat nooit lukken !!
Gregory Peony (2025-01-24 23:06:25+00:00): Hi, in future please explicitly state in your changeset comment whether an admin boundary is legaly defined to change with a waterway, or if it should remain static.--- Also please add the source of the boundary information.--- I am now editing a waterway and it would be convenient to know if the admin boundary should share a common geomerty. Thank you for your contribution.
vasony (2022-01-10 15:17:48+00:00): Szia!

Mi a forrása az utcanév változásnak.? Ha a házszámokkal lekövetjük, akkor most miden házszám kétszer lesz. 

Tamás
Linea88 (2022-01-10 15:27:46+00:00): Szia!
Most terveztem ide egy lakásbővítést. Az építész tervező ezt mondta, hogy az elmúlt évben ezen szakaszt átnevezték Ney Dávidra. Ezért módosítottam. A számozás ezen a szakaszon megmaradt. Lehet a folytatás lett átszámozva.
Üdv. Laci.
vasony (2022-01-10 15:35:16+00:00): Köszi,  közben én is megtaláltam a határozatot. A második kérdésemre  a választ pedig megadtad a házszámokkal, akkor régi Ney Dávidot újra fel kell mérni.
Tamás
gpserror (2022-09-02 18:00:44+00:00): Hi, I am wondering about the two abandoned railways 1018544766 and 1018544767 - I don't see them in imagery and buildings have been built over them, should they really be "abandoned" (meaning the bed and metal should be there but overgrown with weeds), "razed" (they were removed), or should they simply be removed as they no longer exist?
faderfa64 (2022-01-05 15:41:27+00:00): No aparece la casa en el mapa
RaccoonFederation (2022-01-05 15:51:51+00:00): May I ask why you changed this road to a footpath? From bing imagery it looks like a road.
gemmpope (2022-01-05 15:55:26+00:00): car have go stuck down it
RaccoonFederation (2022-01-05 17:00:00+00:00): I don't live in Fowey, do you live in the area? 
If it's possible for some vehicles, eg motorcycles and bicycles it would be better tagged as something like "service road" or "alley" . From the satellite photos it definitely looks like residents use the road for their cars, so it might be best as a service road with motor_vehicle=destination , which means "no through traffic".
RaccoonFederation (2022-01-05 17:15:45+00:00): I've made a few changes based on how I think it should be. Feel free to make further changes if you think I got something wrong. Thanks
gemmpope (2022-01-06 08:25:12+00:00): thank you that looks better
user_5359 (2022-01-05 20:26:21+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13634287. Did you mean the key is_in:health_level6 instead of is_in:level6?

Bonjour ! Veuillez consulter le site https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13634287. Voulez-vous dire la clé is_in:health_level6 au lieu de is_in:level6 ?
ohmanger (2022-02-25 13:11:05+00:00): Hi Mauls, I've noticed that you've reverted my edits merging the abandoned railway with the cyclepath/footpath/road. The old railway mapping is a bit of a mystery to me, but this appears to be the recommended way of mapping them on the wiki.

Please could you advise as I'd like to know why these changes were necessary. Perhaps a relation containing the rail information/ways would be better suited?
Mauls (2022-02-25 13:34:38+00:00): The tags do not combine well if the ways are combined (things like names and reference numbers), and it confused which adjoined items like gates or fences affect which item.

It also causes issues where there are differences in the twitter (like wiggles in the cycleway).

I do not believe the wiki suggests combining the two.
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-08 08:39:12+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115901189
dasmarinas_mapper (2022-01-05 20:17:43+00:00): Eliminated all primary and secondary ways in historic old Manila, consistent with other cities with historic old centres like Milan and Madrid.

Most roads previously designated as primary or secondary ways in the vicinity are used mainly by local traffic (Jones Bridge) or lead to heavily pedestrianised and congested inner city streets (MacArthur Bridge).

Most through routes go around the city centre via C-1, Quezon Blvd, or Roxas Blvd, but tertiary ways are retained for local intracity routing.
BCNorwich (2022-01-06 10:11:34+00:00): Hi, You placed several service roads on top of existing footpaths making duplication of highways thus disrupting routing. I've removed your duplications and amended the existing highways.

Please bear in mind these problems for your future mapping.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 13:19:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122579361 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some changes that appear to be mostly vandalism in Iraq.
Wynndale (2022-01-06 19:20:49+00:00): This was discussed on the [talk-gb mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2022-January/028333.html) with [this reponse](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2022-January/028340.html).
WalthamCity (2022-01-06 22:09:01+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I’ve just had a read of Mark’s blog and I can see he has a lot of experience with these kind of questions. I’ll defer to his judgement and revert my change.
eggie (2022-01-05 18:04:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Meestal gebruiken we de tag access=private in zo'n geval.
agricultural=yes zou kunnen, maar niet vehicle=agricultural

Je hek zit niet vast middels een node aan de track en zal dus niets doen in OSM. Kijk je nog even?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ivanbranco (2022-01-05 19:06:08+00:00): Ciao LukeDH,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41903022

come mai hai cancellato questo landuse?
Jrachi (2022-01-06 15:27:41+00:00): Ciao.
Fai attenzione a quando cambi la way di una relazione e controlla l'ordine.
I via Roma a Cesana hai rovesciato due membri.
Ho già corretto.

Ivo, Jrachi
LukeDH (2022-01-11 02:50:36+00:00): Ciao. Il landuse è stato cancellato perché era troppo approssimativo. L'ho rifatto definendo meglio i contorni
ivanbranco (2022-01-11 05:30:29+00:00): Grazie per la risposta. Ho visto che fai la stessa cosa anche con gli edifici a volte, una buona pratica sarebbe quella di sistemare ciò che è già mappato invece di cancellarlo e ridisegnarlo da zero, in questo modo si preserva la history.
LukeDH (2022-01-11 05:44:30+00:00): Sì esatto. Lo faccio apposta così da impiegare meno tempo e non avere dati di intralcio. Tanto quello che conta è il risultato finale. Da adesso comunque eviterò di eliminare se non necessario e sistemerò le cose
Taksine (2024-09-16 06:13:53+00:00): This is China, not the UK, you cannot write the name in English.
G_P_J (2022-01-10 10:34:02+00:00): Cześć, 
z jakiego powodu skasowałeś nazwę ulicy ks. Kędzierskiego? Ulica występuje oficjalnie w Geoportalu. Plac być może istnieje nazwany lokalnie nieoficjalnie, ale ulica ma oficjalną nazwę. 
Pozdrawiam,
Piotr
kasztelan111 (2022-01-10 13:38:28+00:00): W bazie danych GUS TERYT widnieje tylko nazwa placu, więc uznałem że nazwa ulicy została wprowadzona omyłkowo i od początku chodziło o plac.
Lokai (2022-01-06 22:27:13+00:00): Hallo,

du kartierst am Sülzlochweg access = destination. Das ist ungewöhnlich, da in dem Fall auch Fußgänger, die dort nur so durch gehen möchten, das nicht dürfen. Ist das Verbot nicht doch nur für Fahrzeuge? vehicle=destination
uwe-shwbl (2022-01-07 18:16:52+00:00): Hallo Lokai,
Du liegst mit Deiner Annahme völlig richtig. Das Schild ist das übliche "Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art" mit Zusatz "Anlieger frei". Danke für den Hinweis. Ich glaube, das habe ich kürzlich noch woanders falsch getagged.
Lokai (2022-01-08 05:13:45+00:00): Hallo,

schön, dass du dich meldest und es gleich berichtigt hast.

Gute Zeit

L.
eggie (2022-01-05 18:08:47+00:00): Dag Toffie... 
Alle begin is moeilijk. 
Vreemd dat het access=private is tot het hek (Dat zou dan juist toch wel toegankelijk moeten zijn) en er verder geen accesstags staan?  Ook niet op het hek?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-05 18:58:42+00:00): De tagging access=private heb ik naar het hek veplaatst.
Gr eggie
Rainero (2022-03-04 10:55:06+00:00): Hallo Suny Kim,  
du hast hier bei der Ergänzung des wikidata-Tags highway=residential gelöscht, wodurch die Straße verschwunden ist.  
Ich repariere das mal.

Servus,  
Rainer
Suny Kim (2022-03-04 11:12:19+00:00): O Mist! Danke, Suny
zluuzki (2022-01-05 18:45:32+00:00): Hello, you created recently this firepit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9394833036
This looks like it's on private property (=no public access) so access=private should be added.

When you are adding culverts, you shouldn't tag them like you did at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018567502
A "pipeline" is a closed system that transports stuff (usually oil or gas) over longer distances. Culverts under roads should be tagged with 
waterway=stream
and tunnel=yes.
See https://i.imgur.com/wqix5x5.png and https://i.imgur.com/TChUXpK.png for a screenshot of the editor if you dont know how to do it.
Otherwise thank you for your efforts, keep up the good work!
davegis (2023-04-17 13:33:12+00:00): Okay, Thankyou. I will tag them as waterway=stream
and tunnel=yes..
4004 (2022-01-05 19:02:30+00:00): а что "ред" то?
letsridebikes (2022-01-07 22:23:26+00:00): TIL of addr:parentstreet, cheers!
user_2066394 (2022-01-07 21:43:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018570424
Jetzt hat die Feuerwehrzufahrt aber keine Verbindung mehr zum übrigen Wegenetz. Vor der Bearbeitung war das gegeben.
Raphii (2022-01-08 08:10:01+00:00): Danke jetzt  habe ich dies Berücksichtigt
tsp15 (2022-02-10 18:41:43+00:00): Nazwę wpisujemy tylko wtedy, kiedy jest faktycznie nadana, nie umieszczamy tam opisu obiektu.
Marek-M (2022-02-11 08:40:44+00:00): Edycja jest niestety błędna. Ciąg pieszo-rowerowy był prawidłowo oznakowany. Jest to przypadek 'S7' z wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#R.C3.B3.C5.BCne Wycofuję edycję.
maraf24 (2022-01-11 11:46:51+00:00): Usunąłeś bezpowrotnie telefon i website szkoły:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/307933883/history
maraf24 (2022-01-11 11:47:20+00:00): *email
maraf24 (2022-01-11 11:48:26+00:00): Dlaczego private?
Podane godziny otwarcia wskazują, że plac jest dostępny dla każdego w podanym czasie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93638624
user_2066394 (2022-01-07 21:35:33+00:00): Dann müssten theoretisch noch Wege zum/vom Tor da sein?
SeSch (2022-01-09 18:02:55+00:00): Da ist eine Wiese mit einem Gitterzaun und verschlossenem Gittertor. Ein wirklicher Weg führt nicht zum Tor (wenn ich mich richtig erinnere).
Ich vermute das Tor wird dann aufgesperrt, wenn die Stadt die Sträucher zuschneidet und zu diesem Zweck mit Fahrzeugen anrückt.
user_2066394 (2022-01-09 20:33:45+00:00): Alles klar, das gibt mehr Kontext
Danysan95 (2022-10-04 10:18:08+00:00): Both wikidata entities tagged in name:etymology:wikidata=* ([1], [2]) represent the parks themselves, not the entity that these parks are named after. For this reason they should be tagged with wikidata=*, not name:etymology:wikidata=*.

[1]: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16953285
[2]: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q8021078
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115806717
user_12500175 (2022-01-05 17:54:20+00:00): Hallo, bei Gebäuden kommt bei Name nicht die Adresse rein sondern nur wenn das Gebäude einen explizierten Eigennamen hat.
user_12500175 (2022-01-06 14:11:41+00:00): Da keine Reaktion kam habe ich das wieder zurückgesetzt.
Hier nochmal der WIKI Eintrag zu Adressen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr
user_12500175 (2022-01-05 18:12:28+00:00): Hallo,
Du hast da Gebäude als Farmland eingetragen, das ist doch aber die Reithalle
user_12500175 (2022-01-05 19:28:31+00:00): Habs mal korrigiert
Valarr (2022-01-06 05:48:32+00:00): Hi, have you checked if the satellite imagery you are using is accurately aligned? You can check alignment by turning on GPS traces, using the Taiwan e-Map Open Data layer, or using data from Strava (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava).
For reference, Bing currently has an offset of about (-6, 5) for this area.
user_12500175 (2022-01-05 18:16:48+00:00): Hallo, achte beim Mappen auf die Fehlerhinweise von ID.
Hier gehen Wege über Gebäude. Wenn du Hilfe beim mappen brauchst schau mal in deutsche Forum
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
daganzdaanda (2022-01-09 14:53:56+00:00): Hi, ich habe die Änderungen zurückgesetzt, aber den Operator am Parkplatz behalten. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202729790
user_5359 (2022-01-07 06:30:37+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of hash character inside of seamark:light:#:character? See also https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=seamark%3Alight
AlejandroAlba (2022-01-07 19:46:32+00:00): a typo  of copy-paste the tag from OSM's wiki.
Nakaner-repair (2023-02-10 12:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 132358000 where the changeset comment is: Qualitativ mangelhaften Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht. So wie ich unsere StVB kenne, hebt diese keine Einbahnstraßenfreigaben auf.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-05 18:49:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016688799/history
surface=construction is not correct.
It should be:
highway=construction
construction=residential

The DWG is waiting for your reply.

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-01-05 19:08:18+00:00): Account blocked:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5585
MarcoR (2022-01-06 10:46:14+00:00): I don't know the place but your changes contain no errors.

Keep up the good work!
Marco.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115808761
R3gi (2022-02-04 15:41:39+00:00): Ahoj, bacha, mám za to, že Mapy.cz by neměly být používány jako zdroj z licenčních důvodů.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115808765
davča95 (2022-02-07 17:49:36+00:00): aha, díky
4004 (2022-01-06 21:47:20+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
фото лучше грузить в mapillary, тогда они показываются для близлежащих точек в османде и на сайте мапсми
hatul (2022-02-09 21:55:34+00:00): למה להוסיף לנחל מזור tourism=attraction?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531914108
zstadler (2022-02-10 10:10:43+00:00): טעות בהמרה של נקודת עיניין
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9142621174/history
user_5359 (2022-01-07 06:24:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use for the keys explicitly British English. For more details have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.

Bem-vindo ao OSM! Por favor, use para as chaves explicitamente o inglês britânico. Para mais detalhes, consulte o website http://wiki.osm.org.
wkdgs (2022-01-06 09:05:20+00:00): Hi,

die Notiz kannst du auch durch Tags beschreiben.

Für das Datum der letzten Überprüfung gibt es den Tag "check_date":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:check_date

Und um anzugeben, dass ein Objekt nicht mehr verwendet wird, kann man den disused-Präfix verwenden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Der "note"-Tag ist eher für Infos an andere Mapper gedacht und wird, soweit ich weiß, von den meisten Karten nicht ausgewertet.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115809500