piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_11418917 (2021-07-14 09:50:40+00:00): Dear Mr. Mohamed_Gamal, Please pay attention to the road turn restrictions. you deleted a way and merged it but this removed the turn restrictions. I will revert this and please check your previous edits around Baghdad if you messed up a turn restriction. Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107928036
Mohamed_Gamal (2021-07-14 12:00:40+00:00): Dear lockdownguy,
I checked this now many times and the two highway i did merge didn't have any turn restriction, and I am very aware of turn restrictions,so don't worry of any messed in the data.
Thank you.
Mond00 (2021-07-13 19:28:40+00:00): Betrifft nur den Abschnitt von kalvarienweg bis Höhe Straße
hoserab (2021-07-13 18:41:41+00:00): Oh, and I deleted node 7251853879 from the map, marking the Calgary Tower. Contrary to the edit summary of the mapper who added it, the Calgary Tower was already on the map...
EinKonstanzer (2021-09-16 19:04:23+00:00): Das ist völliger Mist. Der Weg war bereits richtig getaggt!
StKe (2021-09-20 09:03:53+00:00): Es sah so aus, als dürfte jeder diesen Weg nutzen. Hatte ich etwas übersehen?
OSMPossum (2021-07-13 18:57:20+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Standard Imagery; Mapillary
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-04 01:36:10+00:00): Hello!

You used
military=trenche
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361774941/history

Have you maybe meant
military=trench
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
Sandal man (2026-02-04 08:04:13+00:00): Solved, thanks
Jakka (2021-07-14 07:32:02+00:00): Hier is op een parking vlak de tag parking=lane toegevoegd. Deze tag wordt eerder gebruikt op de hoofdweg.
(desnoods knippen op lengte waar langs parkeerstrook strook = lane op de openbare weg is)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
dries0 (2021-07-15 10:42:38+00:00): *blush* ik weet niet goed wat je hiermee bedoelt. Moet het anders worden aangeduid? Moet ik iets doen?
Jakka (2021-07-15 10:47:41+00:00): die parking:lane hoort niet thuis op een parking vlak.
Of parking vlak of op de hoofdweg parking:lane.
eggie (2021-07-13 21:10:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback: Soms verandert er wel eens wat. Gebouwen zijn echter directe import vanuit het kadaster. Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit aan het Kadaster doorgeven. Dan komt het ook weer goed in OSM.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-07-13 21:23:28+00:00): Luchtfoto's vertekenen... schuin genomen.  tower heb ik omgetagd naar mast en iets verplaatst.
name=Luchtalarm (tagging voorgaande mapper)  heb ik verwijderd.

Veel plezier met mappen.
eggie (2021-07-13 21:15:30+00:00): Het is bijna ondoenlijk omgebouwen aan te passen met luchtfoto's.
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster
Volgens mij zijn ze er al mee bezig, maar een berichtje kun je er altijd aan wagen. 
Anders komt bij periodoieke update de oude vorm soms weer terug. 
Ik zal even wat uitlijnen met de BAG.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Langenhorsterweg%206&resultOffset=0&objectId=1735100000033987&geometry.x=242432.37499743&geometry.y=477353.63899978&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=

MVG
eggie
Viki_travel_weak (2021-07-14 07:18:36+00:00): Other legal sources for editing used in the josm based sources: 'Strava cycling and running heatmap', 'TIGER Roads 2020', 'U.S. Forest Roads Overlay', 'osm imagery based'.
CENTSOARER (2021-07-13 21:42:06+00:00): Con relación al error de JOSM mencionado en el comentario del changeset, se refería a una etiquetación errónea del municipio vecino Huixquilucan, que había sido desprovisto de una keytag type=boundary. Este error ya fue subsanado.
snoozingnewt (2021-07-13 19:41:49+00:00): Hi! Please try to use more descriptive changeset comments. Thanks for mapping!
jleedev (2021-07-13 19:53:50+00:00): Please explain these deletions.
jleedev (2021-07-13 19:53:59+00:00): This school sure seems to exist: https://www.euclidschools.org/bluestoneelementary_home.aspx
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-07-13 20:05:04+00:00): the school tag was an accident, the other tags like apartments i'm gonna replace with point tags and i'm repairing the road tags as well
jleedev (2021-07-13 20:07:02+00:00): You should not have deleted the apartments without creating the nodes.
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-07-13 20:09:08+00:00): ok i did not know this, thank you but you don't have to respond to every single one of my tags, just one like on this one is fine to let me know i'm doing wrong.
ElliottPlack (2021-07-22 16:47:29+00:00): By local custom the areas where streets go through a park are not typically 'exempted' from the polygon like you would have in a parcel based dataset. I think of OSM as more of an abstraction in that regard. Sure DOT owns the lane where 83 or 29th is but the little multipolygons add some complexity to the map that may be unneeded. What do you think?
pkoby (2021-07-22 17:54:58+00:00): I guess that's personal preference. In my mind, Druid Park Lake Drive (for instance) would not be viewed by most people as "park", so I would exempt it. I suppose there's nothing wrong with joining all the bits together, but to me that doesn't reflect what's "on the ground".

Personally, I like to map landuse block-by-block, too, so I suppose I'm much more fine-grained in some of my mapping.
ElliottPlack (2021-07-22 19:03:44+00:00): Someone at Rec&Parks has hand manicured the park data there, and at other sites, if you look closely at the data geometry vs what's in the parcel database. I like to refer to the city's CodeMap to verify ownership of public property (Green on there) and other things and if you look there, the parcel doesn't remove the roads. It begs the question though on what is exempt and what is not. Greenspring Ave for instance is still not exempted. This gets into the old OSM debate over landuse mapping and what's legal vs what is observable. I think what we have here at Druid now is probably fine. I personally wouldn't change it back.
pkoby (2021-07-22 19:18:11+00:00): So you think the multipolygon is fine? I did make minor adjustments to geometry to refine to imagery. But you're right that Greenspring is weird. It does feel different, though.

And yeah, parcel outlines vs actual landuse is silly and confusing, as bureaucratic data tend to be.
ElliottPlack (2021-07-22 19:25:09+00:00): Speaking of which, do you think the zoo should be removed from the park (set to inner?) The zoo is not publicly accessible without paying a fee, and is 100% fenced. I've been many times, its a nice zoo, but have thought about removing it from the park MP. Recently I've been working on a project to recategorize large state parks from park to nature_reserve and have thought about this in the city. Gwynn Falls is more of a candidate for that treatment though, as is the back part of Druid. Either way, I think it'd be more right to show the zoo outside of the 'green' area.

Also, I'm about to pop out a small inner piece from the park that I noticed on the code map is not publicly owned, there's a tiny parcel that someone paid $2M for inside the zoo for what looks like some sort of animal hospital facility.
ElliottPlack (2021-07-22 19:25:32+00:00): See sheet 3: https://gis.baltimorecity.gov/zoning/blockplats/3499.pdf
pkoby (2021-07-22 19:35:51+00:00): I would NOT remove the zoo from the park, simply because every mention I've come across describes the zoo as an element of the park (e.g. https://bcrp.baltimorecity.gov/parks/druid-hill). Also, the park is always described as 745 acres, but when I select all parts in JOSM, it's measuring out to 607. That's pretty far off, but removing the zoos 125 acres would really throw off that number.
ElliottPlack (2021-07-22 19:42:50+00:00): Don't be surprised if a random throwaway account comes and removed the leisure=park tag and changes it to something else. It has been a real battle :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark#Mapping_history_in_the_USA
jleedev (2021-07-13 19:52:45+00:00): Please explain why all these apartments should be deleted.
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-07-13 20:05:26+00:00): I'm gonna update them with point tags instead of just one whole residental area tag
jleedev (2021-07-13 20:09:42+00:00): That should be done in a single changeset. Anything else reads as vandalism.

Besides, apartments as areas is pretty sensible.
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-07-13 20:11:21+00:00): Ok, i get it now, you already told me what i did wrong. -_-
lakedistrict (2021-07-13 21:28:34+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits. The path does appear to be visible on Esri imagery (dated May 2020) and other undated satellite imagery sources. Perhaps a trail_visibility may be appropriate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
woollypigs (2021-07-14 07:15:45+00:00): Good thinking. Even without bramble this bit is hard to find or see. Many other paths, both sheep and human made, are easier to see/find. I think this section is not used as the other path (to the west) is more direct from below the hill to the top.
pitscheplatsch (2021-07-16 05:50:47+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107932091
pitscheplatsch (2021-07-16 05:50:57+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107931973
CENTSOARER (2021-07-13 20:02:30+00:00): Quise decir meses, no años.
eggie (2021-07-13 21:04:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback:  De postcode en (phone ) zet ik weer naar het format van OSM. Het zou anders niet werken.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
opendcc (2023-11-09 07:38:07+00:00): Bonjour/Hello,
why did you tag entrance on a line? routing software can't handle it, no renderer will show it and wiki says: use only on points. Even when it is open (and no clearly visible 'entrance'): why not tag the building as roof und layer 1 and extend the footway?

cdmt Wolfgang
ibanez (2021-07-15 08:39:22+00:00): Hi, willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz den Knoten 4901727002 (eine Adresse im Sonnenweg) auf eine unpasssende Position verschoben (an der Helgoländer Straße). Ich habe das korregiert.
tobabu (2021-07-15 08:49:37+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für die Korrektur. Da war wohl etwas unvorsichtig. Wollte nur die Oberfläche anpassen. Also werde ich nächstes mal mehr mehr aufpassen. Schönen Tag.
ibanez (2021-07-16 09:13:16+00:00): Wenn du dich für das Mapping von Wegoberflächen interessierst solltest du mal einen Blick auf Streetcomplete (als Editor-Alternative) werfen. 
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.westnordost.streetcomplete
https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete
tobabu (2021-07-17 05:08:35+00:00): Hallo ibanez,
Danke für den Hinweis, sehr interessant. gibt es das auch für iOS oder Windows 10?
Ich konnte bisher nichts finden.
ibanez (2021-07-17 09:38:49+00:00): Haool Tobabu,
Tobias Zwick der Maintainer von Streetcomplete hat hier geschrieben das es keine iOS Version geben wird: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/43
Es gab eine Abspaltung auf Basis von GoMap! für iOS die aber aufgegeben wurde:
https://github.com/wtimme/OSM-Completionist
GoMap für iOS ist aber eher ein rein mobiler Editor:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go_Map!!
Hoffe das hilft dir. Viele Grüße.
Mashin (2021-07-14 00:32:19+00:00): So the house has two addresses at two different streets?
Also South Elm Street seems to be quite far from the house.
CT-WNI (2021-07-14 00:46:44+00:00): I'm not sure which house you mean. I changed South Elm Street from a 2 way street to a 1 way street between Union Street and East Clay Street.
Mashin (2021-07-14 04:32:57+00:00): Oh I see that you did a second edit.

I meant that you deleted this address point: 8762379169

And merged it into this address point: 8762436479

as addr:housenumber=18;233 and addr:street=East Dover Street;South Elm Street

(your second changeset changed the housenumber back to 18, but kept the street)

I was wondering if n8762379169 was wrong and should be really deleted and if n8762436479 address assigned to two streets at the same time.
CT-WNI (2021-07-14 11:44:42+00:00): I'll look at it again. I don't know what happened. It was not my intent to change any house numbers - only to change the street to one way
Mashin (2021-07-14 13:02:49+00:00): Hmm I wonder if that's some kind of iD bug.
Unfortunately iD is not that well maintained these days
CT-WNI (2021-07-14 14:59:56+00:00): I think I got it sorted. Thanks for the heads up
Mashin (2021-07-14 16:26:33+00:00): awesome, thanks a ton!
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-28 14:26:02+00:00): Sicher, dass die Namen so stimmen? Die Namen hören sich nicht nach einem typischen Namen für eine Hütte an.
complete_gth (2023-02-18 16:09:52+00:00): Moin,
bist du dir bei den Bürgersteigen in Uder sicher, dass man auch auf dem südlichen Bürgersteig (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964075715) mit dem Rad fahren darf (und auf dem Nördlichen nur in eine Richtung)? Bei den Mapillaryaufnahmen aus Mai 2021 konnte man noch sehen, dass der nördliche Bürgersteig in beiden Richtungen mit VZ 240 beschildert ist und der Südliche gar nicht (bzw. Richtung Osten nur in Abschnitten).
dkudlek (2023-02-18 20:29:22+00:00): Hi, 
war mir eigentlich ziemlich sicher, dass ich auf der nördlichen Seite Richtung Westen die Schilder für beide Richtungen vermisst habe. Ich habe aber von dem Tag keine Bilder der Situation. Ich war 2 Monate nach diesen Mapillary Aufnahmen unterwegs. Ich kann mich an keine baulichen Änderungen erinnern, die eine neue Beschilderung gerechtfertigt hätten.
Von daher werden wohl die Mapillaryaufnahmen korrekt sein.
mozita (2021-08-17 14:16:44+00:00): Hallo profemo,

vielen Dank für die Nutzung vom Waldbrand-Editor!

Anhand deiner Fotos habe ich gesehen, dass du einige Wasserentnahmestellen als Überflurhydrant (pillar) eingetragen hast, obwohl es eigentlich Löschwasserbrunnen (pipe) sind. Wäre schön, wenn du das direkt hier oder auch im Waldbrand-Editor ändern könntest.

Beste Grüße und weiter so!
mozita
Lee Carré (2021-07-18 16:44:40+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please.
OddlyAngled (2021-07-14 00:06:44+00:00): Elevations need to be listed in meters not feet, can you fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107934449
OddlyAngled (2021-07-14 00:07:42+00:00): Same with this one, thx :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107934599
ovruni (2021-07-13 21:38:36+00:00): Hola, he revertido su conjunto de cambios, donde ha cambiado vías a parques y agregado parques ficticios.
Saludos
indianajoe (2021-07-27 20:46:30+00:00): Bus routes were added by a bot and subsequently reverted by the powers-that-be. All routes except Gold and Black are west side school buses. They're subject to constant, unpublished changes as students are added and removed from routes so I see no purpose in having them at all.
Frans S (2021-08-10 15:05:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark.
You mapped often a cluster (block) of buildings and tagged them as 1 building, 
Each building needs to be mapped individually.
I have to remove your mappings because it takes more time to correct them rather than map them again 
I invalidate this task. Feel free to map the buildings as requested.
Best regards and keep mapping
Javierpf (2021-07-18 13:17:27+00:00): Hola Ariel, vi este l[ímite de barrios. lo voy a borrar pq esta duplicado, ademas que le falta una parte. Los barrios los limitamos usando las calles y definiendo una relación. Cualquier cosa podes preguntarme, y tmb la wiki de osm , seccion Argentina podes encontrar info de cómo mapear.
Slds.
dalmond (2021-07-14 00:19:20+00:00): Source of changes was a site survey not bing.
A67-A67 (2021-07-14 14:00:18+00:00): Het water overlapt hier nu met het gras. In het water is natuurlijk geen gras.

Dit kun je oplossen met een multipolygoon. In JOSM kun je die gemakkelijk maken door zowel het water als het gras te selecteren en op CTRL+B te drukken.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-07-14 03:30:10+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM.
The correct way to tag a cemetery is as landuse=cemetery rather than as a place of worship. The name tag should also be reserved for actual names - do you know what this cemetery is called?
Happy mapping!
WoodWoseWulf (2021-07-14 03:31:52+00:00): This nature reserve is already on the map, here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12193033#map=15/42.0762/-72.4042

Are you sure this is the same feature?
mariotomo (2021-07-28 16:46:26+00:00): Hola Alvarado2510. al añadir el elemento a la relación, te se olvidó definir su "role". acabo de mejorarlo.
felipeeugenio (2021-07-14 14:26:19+00:00): *fictional names
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107937688
felipeeugenio (2021-07-14 00:40:59+00:00): Estimado. Las ediciones las hace para sacar provecho en juegos como PokemonGO? Porque está usando etiquetas erroneas y las fotos satelitales son bastante recientes. En ciertos lugares no se observa lo que agrega.
Ni hablar del monumento a Thor.

Rogamos por favor entender de que este es un proyecto serio usado por gobiernos, empresas y organizaciones de todo el mundo.
Existen maperos de Punta Arenas que con mucho gusto pueden ayudarlo.
También puede unirse a la comunidad si quiere.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107937772
Kovoschiz (2021-07-14 05:54:56+00:00): 1. `name=` is for the most common name. This is not a database for discussing what should be the proper or "original" name. 
2. You need to transfer the tags completely.
ovruni (2021-07-14 05:04:36+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado varias etiquetas con layer=-1, tanto a nuevas vías como anteriores, dando la impresión que estas están bajo el suelo. De la misma forma he recuperado y agregado prefijos de vías que habían sido retirados.
Saludos
ovruni (2021-07-14 05:21:04+00:00): También he visto aceras que se han ampliado para unirlas con las que se encuentran al otro extremo de la intersección creando pasos de peatones en lugares que existen, he retirado estos objetos también.
Saludos
Javierpf (2021-07-18 13:39:28+00:00): Revierto el cambio porq la demarcacion del barrio esta duplicada con otra existente previamente.
Vintagejhan (2021-07-14 02:53:56+00:00): 細部道路用衛星圖看不出來有沒有連接起來
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-07-23 02:26:54+00:00): اسم المكان هذا "نفيد أمره " نرجوا منكم عدم العبث بالمسميات
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-07-23 01:58:39+00:00): بيانات الحدود السكنية لا تغطي تلك المساحة التي وضعتها
user_8655426 (2021-07-14 11:52:02+00:00): この変更セットはリバートしました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107976048

異議などがありましたら、このセット(#107940649)にコメントをお願いいたします。

「岐阜市認定路線網図」利用規約
https://gis-gifu.jp/gifu/Agreement?IsPost=False&MapId=20008&RequestPage=%2fgifu%2fPositionSelect%3fmid%3d20008

JA:著作権
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E8%91%97%E4%BD%9C%E6%A8%A9
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107940649
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-07-14 07:29:56+00:00): Hello nguyenhx123vn. Hope you are doing great.
You have added too many rivers here. Do you mind sharing your data references?
Thank you
**
Xin chào nguyenhx123vn. Hy vọng bạn đang làm rất tốt.
Bạn đã thêm quá nhiều sông ở đây. Bạn có phiền chia sẻ tham chiếu dữ liệu của mình không?
Cảm ơn bạn
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107941112
corinag_grab (2022-06-08 06:05:18+00:00): Hello,

I was wondering whether this oneway is missing a time condition - between 6:00-9:00 - looking at KartaView imagery from 2019 (https://kartaview.org/details/5308505/0), it looks that way.
According to your knowledge, were there any updates for the road in the meantime?

Thank you,
Corina
user_8655426 (2021-07-14 11:49:47+00:00): この変更セットはリバートしました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107976048

異議などがありましたら、このセット(#107941984)にコメントをお願いいたします。

「岐阜市認定路線網図」利用規約
https://gis-gifu.jp/gifu/Agreement?IsPost=False&MapId=20008&RequestPage=%2fgifu%2fPositionSelect%3fmid%3d20008

JA:著作権
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E8%91%97%E4%BD%9C%E6%A8%A9
Sergey82K (2022-01-17 11:08:42+00:00): Калинова "перша" чи "Перша" калинова? Як більш вірно? В іншому садовому товаристві за офіційним планом "1-а садова вулиця".
julcnx (2021-08-11 08:25:22+00:00): Please refrain from tagging agricultural tracks as residential. https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107942862
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
🅢🅐🅜🅐🅝➤ (2021-07-14 05:01:28+00:00): بر اساس گزارش کاربران #نشان از تاریخ 22/4/1400 طبق مصوبه شورای ترافیک این خیابان از میدان بیدبلند(قدس) به سمت خیابان جوانمردی یک طرفه شده است
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-07-14 07:22:23+00:00): Hello nguyenhx123vn. Hope you are doing great.
Would you mind sharing the imagery source of "highway=primary"?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/964177081
Thank you
**
Xin chào nguyenhx123vn. Hy vọng bạn đang làm rất tốt.
Bạn có phiền chia sẻ nguồn hình ảnh của "highway = primary" không?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/964177081
Cảm ơn bạn
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107946488
julcnx (2021-07-31 14:18:27+00:00): Bad tagging. Source tag missing. The whole area is private farm. Please correct accordingly.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-07-14 07:42:45+00:00): Hello nguyenhx123vn. Hope you are doing great.
You have added too many rivers here. Do you mind sharing your data references?
Thank you
**
Xin chào nguyenhx123vn. Hy vọng bạn đang làm rất tốt.
Bạn đã thêm quá nhiều sông ở đây. Bạn có phiền chia sẻ tham chiếu dữ liệu của mình không?
Cảm ơn bạn
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107947378
SekeRob (2021-07-14 11:33:36+00:00): Hi Finix

Osmose does not like different spelling, even low/cap. "Close similar name
Piazza Della Rinascita" in fact the map now shows the same name printed very close to each other in carto, looks horrible, (and I get blamed because once I created these paths purely for routing purposes. (areas don't resolve in navigation). Suggest noname=yes. tags. At any rate, the Wikipedia reference the name with a lower 'della' https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piazza_della_Rinascita

ciao
FinixFighter (2021-07-14 14:32:12+00:00): You're right, noname is better, didn't think about it while I was using StreetComplete. Anyway I don't know why the app uploaded it with uppercase letters, I clearly remember having typed "d", not "D". Anyway, it doesn't matter anymore.. 
bye! :)
SekeRob (2021-07-14 14:49:51+00:00): Hi,

you might have a function on that turns first letter of a word in the name field in SC, if you can even set it. At times I do battle with this as when there's pino and Pino in the species:it list. Convention is Proper, but ID editor insists on pino, so have to trick by backspacing. Lots of Pino's still here, though I prefer Pinot noir ;P

cheers