piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RemkoV (2019-11-08 06:43:10+00:00): Dank voor de correcties. De zendmast is inderdaad verdwenen, na een toren rand op 8 november 2016. Ik zie dat de label brouwerij is verdwenen? Op nummer 16 is een Proeflokaal en daarnaast een brouwerij gevestigd. Mummer 16A, zit op de plek waar het label Wispe Bierwinkel staat, dit is dus nu een bierwinkel
RemkoV (2019-11-08 06:43:45+00:00): Rand=brand
RemkoV (2019-11-08 06:45:25+00:00): Boven in de toren op circa 50 meter hoogte zit nu een “hotelkamer”, misschien dat deze ook kan worden toegevoegd
eggie (2019-11-08 07:20:22+00:00): Oke Remko.. je kunt het verder rustig aanpassen. De tags kun je aanvullen op de adresnodes.. dus niet op het gebouw zelf.. Gebruik desnoods losse nodes. Kijk in de wiki welke tags je kunt gebruiken. Niet alle tags renderen. ... of rendering gaat traag. Ctrl f5 wil wel eens helpen. 
Succes.. eggie
eggie (2019-11-08 08:07:02+00:00): Tip:  Een name-tag doet alleen iets als er een shop of amenity=  tag bijstaat. 
Een naam alleen zal niet renderen.
Voor brewery zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brewery
name:en rendert niet. 
De naam op het gebouw is Sint-Laurentiuskerk. Welke nametag je daar ook bijzet.. Dat zie je niet op de kaart!
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76777771
name:en zou ik verwijderen. 
De hotelkamer is wellicht het beste te taggen met tourism=guest_house met guest_house=bed_and_breakfast ?
name=....  op een aparte node op de toren.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house
Eggie
mcld (2019-11-16 22:07:13+00:00): Output of "2.0" should be perhaps "2.0 MW"? - On way 404294617
SK53 (2019-11-16 22:16:45+00:00): Yes, I'd think so & there's a typo.
CRCulver (2020-03-01 19:27:47+00:00): Your change from building=school to amenity=school for Scoala George Baritiu in Turda was not “fixing”. In fact, you did damage.

The entire area comprising multiple school buildings is already tagged as amenity=school. The main school building should therefore have a tag building=school, but it should not be tagged amenity=school.

Your change resulted in an erroneous amenity=school within amenity=school, and it prevented the main school building from being rendered.

Please be more careful in future. Always check to see if the area around school buildings is already tagged as amenity=school.
PT-53 (2019-12-13 09:16:15+00:00): Hallo  EinEngener,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diese Linien
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743129452/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743129451/history
ein Hinweis "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.62652&lat=47.60469&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
Bitte beachte auch, daß highways immer mit anderen highways verbunden sein sollten. Sonst kommt die nächste Fehlermeldung "islands".
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-06 11:34:51+00:00): Hallo EinEngener, 
Du hast die fehlenden Merkmale an den Wegen ergänzt, die Wege aber noch nicht mit anderen Wegen / Straßen verbunden. Wie angekündigt werden im OSM-Inspector jetzt Hinweise islands angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=10.62644&lat=47.60464&zoom=18&opacity=0.91&overlays=islands,islands_car,islands_bicycle,islands_all
Ergänzt Du die fehlende Verbindung zur Straße noch?
Grüße und ein gutes neues Jahr
RapidRider (2019-11-07 21:29:41+00:00): Traced house using bing imagery
user_5359 (2019-11-08 05:44:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
eggie (2019-11-07 22:09:56+00:00): Dag WWM.. Kijk even hier welke tags bij een laadpaal horen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

MVG,
Eggie
axelr (2019-11-11 15:39:45+00:00): Hallo tec19,
die public_transport=stop_position ist der Punkt auf dem Fahrweg wo der Bus hält (ganauer die vordere Tür).
Die stop_position ist nicht der Zentralpunkt zwischen den Haltestellen, wie du ihn eingetragen hast. Es gibt an der Haltestelle Wippershain zwei stop_position.
Gruß, Axel
aharvey (2019-11-07 23:39:16+00:00): The level tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level is something most commonly used for indoor mapping to say which floor of a building something is on.

Per the wiki "For typical street and freeway crossings with bridges, layer=* should be used instead."
user_5359 (2019-11-08 05:39:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
user_5359 (2019-11-08 05:35:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
BCNorwich (2019-11-08 07:31:08+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think you've got this building incorrectly placed. It's drawn over another building, a path and meadow.

Could you please make corrections to or remove the building.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-11-11 08:13:44+00:00): Problem has now been fixed by youkay19.

Thanks.
Glassman (2019-11-08 00:26:26+00:00): Great job on the roundabout!!!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76779074
Blandman (2019-11-08 00:57:10+00:00): Thank you!
Warin61 (2019-11-10 07:51:47+00:00): Hi,
Building way 743137692 self intersects .. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.96696&lat=-37.79913&zoom=17
kapazao (2020-01-11 12:43:11+00:00): Hola, ¿el Starbucks que has añadido no es el que estaba puesto un poco más abajo?
Si es así lo suyo sería corregir el que ya había y eliminar el nuevo, para no perder información y evitar duplicidad.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76779332
kapazao (2020-01-11 12:45:56+00:00): Estos son los nodos que comento:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6956081229
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5951319285
user_5359 (2019-11-08 15:11:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
interestingaftermath (2019-11-08 15:14:03+00:00): What do you mean SEO SPAM? How could this be improved? I'm adding the parking aisle to improve Tesla Smart Summon. More info: https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/dk7hy9/smart_summon_paths_use_openstreetmap_data_for/
user_5359 (2019-11-08 15:15:41+00:00): I apologize for the false report. I switch to the wrong browser.
interestingaftermath (2019-11-08 15:16:39+00:00): Have my changes been restored?
user_5359 (2019-11-08 15:20:58+00:00): This was only the wrong message. I revert an other change set.
interestingaftermath (2019-11-08 15:25:52+00:00): Ok. To confirm, my changes are good. Correct?
bhousel (2019-11-08 15:39:55+00:00): Thanks @interestingaftermath - your changes look excellent!  Welcome! 👋
seattlefyi (2019-11-08 17:05:27+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits! Good to see them. There are a few mapping guidelines (it takes a while to learn) but just a couple of friendly suggestions; after you've drawn and tagged a building, if you right-click on the building there's a button to make the corners square which makes the building look better (shortcut 'q' key). Also, when adding street addresses, please expand all abbreviations (SE Mile Hill Dr -> Southeast Mile Hill Drive). Thanks again and hope to see more edits!
mueschel (2019-11-10 13:47:03+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du bei insgesamt 4 großen landuse-Flächen das landuse-Tag ersetzt durch "splitme:landuse" und sie damit praktisch gelöscht?
nurdafur (2019-12-05 22:31:08+00:00): Hallo SK94
Als du hier Trottoirs geändert hast, hast du wohl aus Versehen die Wanderweg-Relation Opfikon - Auholz beschädigt. Ich habe diese nun wieder hergestellt.
Liebe Grüsse
Urs
user_5359 (2019-11-08 20:52:00+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte löschen Sie keine private Weg / Parkplätze, wenn sie existieren!. Man kann Sie mit access=private für die Benutzung sperren (Details siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access) .
EHD2015 (2019-11-08 21:21:18+00:00): Ich bin kein OSM Experte und habe das Naheliegende getan. Wenn jemand meinen Parkplatz als öffentlich ausweist und auch meinen Privatweg, dann habe ich etwas dagegen einzuwenden. Wenn es entsprechend geändert wird schaue ich es mir an und dann sehen wir weiter.
JesseFTW (2024-07-11 02:26:01+00:00): I don't think there should be a section of the Colorado River with waterway=drain here. That breaks the continuity of the waterway, and doesn't seem to be supported by the wiki for dams: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddam . I'm going to remove it for now, but glad to discuss further.
user_10241830 (2019-11-08 07:31:42+00:00): Hallo,

der Kreisel ist ein bisschen klein geraten. Ist das ein kleiner Kreisverkehr (überfahrbare Mittelinsel) oder ein großer Kreisverkehr? Ein großer Kreisverkehr müsste etwas größer gezeichnet werden, ein kleiner Kreisverkehr ganz anders.
pelztier (2019-11-08 15:24:27+00:00): Eine sehr berechtigte Frage. Gib mir noch ein paar Tage Zeit, die Straße soll nächste Woche vorübergehend wieder befahrbar sein; bisher habe ich nur vom Rand der Baustelle darauf gespäht.
Wie würde man denn einen "kleinen" Kreisverkehr modellieren?
user_10241830 (2019-11-08 15:31:21+00:00): Hallo,

ein kleiner Kreisel ist bei uns eine ganz normale Kreuzung deren Schnittpunkt ein highway=mini_roundabout trägt. Er wird also nicht als kreisförmige Fahrbahn gezeichnet. Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269205745
pelztier (2019-11-09 21:13:13+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Der Kreisel hat sich als klein im Sinne des mini_roundabout entpuppt. Habe das korrigiert und gleich die im Bau befindlichen anschließenden Straßen grob angelegt.
viloan (2019-11-08 00:01:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Kovoschiz (2019-11-08 03:36:22+00:00): Are you from Apple? We are discussing in Discord.
Kovoschiz (2019-11-08 03:42:27+00:00): For here, please note that there's sidewalk and crosswalk here, not mapped as separate way. You need to add `foot=yes` and `bike=yes``.
Kovoschiz (2019-11-08 04:09:43+00:00): If you are using street-level imagery, please check if it is outdated. Just as an example, Google Street View is.
Goatosm (2019-11-08 21:48:23+00:00): Yes I’m working on some projects for Apple, and thanks for the invite to the Discord! I use street-level imagery from Mapillary and OpenStreetCam. I’ll go ahead and add the foot=yes and bicycle=yes tags to the motorway_links here. Thanks!
ACarlotti (2019-11-08 01:16:22+00:00): I think this edit is incorrect - Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta shows that there is (or at least was) a traffic island here. The carriageway on either side of the island should therefore be mapped as separate ways, and this is how it was previously mapped. I therefore think this changeset should be reverted, unless the traffic island no longer exists.

Also, I suspect there is a missing turn restriction in the mapping here - do you know (from a source we are permitted to use here, so e.g. Google StreetView is not permitted) whether there are signs indicating that a U-turn from the A1 northbound to southbound is banned? The geometry I see in the imagery suggests that is likely to be the case.

(There is on exception I'm aware of to the general rule of using separate ways around a traffic island, which is for a small traffic island away from any junctions and which can be represented instead by a labelled node. However, that approach isn't possible here.)
NorfolkMustard (2019-11-09 08:18:33+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. You're right - there is a small island here - I'll put it back. I drive this section of road twice a week - there is a no u-turn sign so I'll add that restriction.

Where the A1 slow-down lane joins Silver Street, there's a give-way-line too, will a 90º join be sufficient to give the right guidance in the map for that?

Is there a guide to the finer points of mapping in openstreetmap - e.g. angle of join and if it affects guidance, road type progression etc

Thanks
Stu
ACarlotti (2019-11-10 13:19:05+00:00): Hi Stu,

Firstly, here are a couple of initial links that you might find relevant:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Junctions

In general, I reckon there are two good ways of finding out how to map things - either look for similar situations elsewhere on the map to see how they are mapped, or search on the internet to see what other people have written about mapping that sort of feature. In particular, browsing the wiki is probably a good way of finding some of the latter information. However, you should bear in mind that there is often more than one to map things (e.g. sometimes there's an accuracy/time trade-off), and there's sometimes disagreement between different contributors. Many proposals that are made never become widely accepted.

As for your last paragraph: Usually the the angle at which ways are drawn is some compromise between representing the point at which two ways join, and representing the centrelines near the join in a consistent way. So a single carriageway becoming a dual carriageway cannot avoid including a wiggle in the line mapped for traffic in each direction, but in the case of a slip road this can often be avoid by extending the sliproad's way along its centre line to meet the mainline before actual diverge point. Routing often doesn't care about the exact geometry at the intersection - any constraints are represented by oneway roads or explicit turn restrictions. And I've no idea what you mean by "road type progression", but I think you can probably find some helpful information by searching the wiki or the wider internet.

As for this changeset/junction, I think the best way to proceed would be to revert this changeset (since the previous version probably had appropriate geometry) and add the turn restriction - if you're not sure how to do that then I can easily do it for you later.
ACarlotti (2019-11-10 22:42:31+00:00): I've now reverted this changeset, and added the no U-turn restriction, in changeset 76881246
abrensch (2019-11-14 17:23:56+00:00): Hallo Hirscho,

Du hast Teile der Landgutgasse zur Einbahnstrasse gemacht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67010896
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743161992

Auf den Luft- und Bodenbildern sieht das nicht so aus. Was ist denn da der Sachverhalt?

Danke und Gruss, Ar ndt
Hirscho (2019-11-15 09:49:23+00:00): Dort sind gradlinks und rechts Baustellen:
*) Columbusgasse Anfang
*) Landgutgasse habens einen Palmers eingerissen (das Gebäude drumherum auch) sowie schräg gegenüber is auch Baustelle.

Folglich is eine Straßenverengung mit Einbahn und unter der Woche ein mobiler Bodenschweller, der eine Wasserleitung von nem Hydranten schützt eingerichtet.

Ich fahr da jeden Tag in die Arbeit mit dem Fahrrad

lg TH
viloan (2019-11-08 00:50:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Alan Bragg (2020-01-17 14:06:48+00:00): Nice catch. I believe all secondary roads in Bedford are suppose to be 25 mph.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76782700
user_5359 (2019-11-08 15:10:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2019-11-08 05:22:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
Supaplex (2020-01-02 17:53:40+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DP24PH (2019-11-08 12:45:32+00:00): Various erratum made by DEARPAUL24 due to mis-tagged one-way on the following changeset links: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76785561 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76809660
opendcc (2019-11-08 07:02:34+00:00): Hm, stellt sich sich die Frage, ob ein Hügelchen mit 40m Höhenunterschied zum Bach als Berggipfel gilt oder ob man das einfach mit einem natürliche Absturz umfaßt.

Servus Wolfgang
GPSdog (2019-11-09 02:10:54+00:00): Immerhin geht es über etliche Stufen steil bergauf, entlang eines Kreuzwegs zur Bergkapelle. 40m Differenz macht bei ca. 200m Luftlinie immerhin 20% Steigung.

Grüße, Markus
opendcc (2019-11-09 14:52:18+00:00): Hallo,

darum ja auch die Anregung, das als 'Geländeabsturz' und nicht als Gipfel zu taggen.

Servus
GPSdog (2019-11-10 03:36:57+00:00): Das fände ich auch gut, der Hang ist allerdings etwas "zerklüftet", man müsste wohl mehrere Fall-Linien in seiner ganzen Ausdehnung messen.
mapcarta (2019-11-29 08:51:33+00:00): Why has the label for Hong Kong been deleted? Other cities and regions have them. This is a critically important label and should be restored as soon as possible, as this effectively removes the label for the city and region.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-05 00:26:28+00:00): @peripatetic  - Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  We've had a complaint about some of the deletions by this user and would be grateful if you could let us know if the deletions are being handled by the local community or if you'd like us to help.  You can either comment here or email the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org .
Kovoschiz (2019-12-05 04:40:50+00:00): Reverted this first.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76784253
mapcarta (2019-12-05 10:36:28+00:00): Thanks for the help. @SomeoneElse this appears to have been fixed now. Note that I would have fixed this myself, but despite being a senior software engineer with 12 years experience with a specialty in online maps and myself running one of the top OSM websites, I find OpenStreetMap much too difficult to use and far too confusing to be able to do anything other than simple edits. OpenStreetMap is in critical need of a complete overhaul and needs to be well funded like Wikimedia.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-05 10:43:12+00:00): @peripatetic - thanks.
Maybe it's worth trying to expand your comments into an OSM diary entry, global mailing list post or similar?  That'll have a wider audience than a changeset discussion (which lots of people outside of HK won't be aware of), and those sort of discussions are certainly happening at the moment, since the election for the next OSMF board is just around the corner - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/AGM19/Election_to_Board .
Philip Wan (2019-12-12 01:44:29+00:00): I thought that the region label would appear automatically as a result of the relation boundary, so I deleted it, not realising this was not the case. Still learning.
pangoSE (2019-11-09 12:29:15+00:00): Hej. Välkommen till OSM. Tack for ditt bidrag.
JJIglesias (2019-11-08 04:43:32+00:00): En serio? Calles residenciales en el medio de campos? las calles residenciales son en zonas urbanas, que haya casas a lo largo de las vias no las convierte en calles residenciales...
az09 (2020-10-24 17:42:05+00:00): плохие исправления - взять и время работы снести. ну да мне уже на те места до лампочки, пусть местные сами себе карту исправляют теперь.
П3тр0виЧъ (2020-10-24 17:55:54+00:00): Лес рубят - щепки летят.
Это всё Вовик виноват. Если б не его валидатор, я бы про этот магазин не узнал бы никогда.
JJIglesias (2019-11-08 04:46:31+00:00): Puedo entender eliminar casas mas mapeadas o inexistentes. Pero porque borrar Orchards, Farmlands y Plots?
5m4u9 (2019-11-08 05:56:29+00:00): hay duplicidad de uno sobre otro como contenedor en farms y orchads, los plots creo que eran granjas pero solo pusieron el area construida, igual voy a revisar otra vez para rehacer si hay algo malo.
5m4u9 (2019-11-08 05:57:41+00:00): ya recuerdo los plots, lo pusieron a todo el manzano como plots
zzptichka (2019-11-08 05:32:31+00:00): Please don't snap park boundaries to roads. It's local community practice, as well as global OSM consensus. See more information here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions
Thanks.
user_5359 (2019-11-08 05:17:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your street can't be a one-way street, otherwise the cars can't get back to the main street. Please also note the difference between name and description.
Kovoschiz (2019-11-08 07:56:38+00:00): Thank you first. Don't forget to edit `name:en=*` and `name:zh=*`
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76786586
mavl (2019-11-08 16:30:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Простите, а почему вы обозначили, что улица Зелёная проходит зигзагом? Она ведь проходит просто прямо, как и было раньше обозначено.  
  
Просто для информации: в России действует соглашение об именовании улиц:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3