piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
iWowik (2017-11-22 05:54:46+00:00): Следуйте, пожалуйста, правилам заполнения addr:housenumber, чтобы другим не нужно было за вами исправлять.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
bielebog (2017-11-19 13:16:23+00:00): Die Garage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540376721 _ist_ "privat", sie _heißt nicht "privat".

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name vs. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Bei einem building=garage ist das access=* aber eigentlich auch überflüssig. building=garage ist das IMHO schon ausreichend eingetragen.
ZPPONPF (2017-11-20 10:49:19+00:00): OK
user_5359 (2017-11-14 17:16:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
lakedistrict (2017-11-15 13:12:29+00:00): Why did you change it to subway? Only a small portion of the route is underground so it's probably best described as a light rail system.
Tom317 (2017-11-20 09:40:18+00:00): Yes, but still it is metro. But if you feel, it's better described as a light rail, you can change it back.
3vivekb (2017-11-14 09:51:57+00:00): This upload had a bad tag associated with the ways.  I reverted it myself in #53765788.
mueschel (2017-11-21 17:06:02+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag population:cuunt and its various other spellings you usd here?
please note that OSM does not want to provide personal information about people, just objects like houses. Please have a look to the wiki to see how them are tagged properly.

Cheers, Jan
mavl (2018-12-25 19:19:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:37:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:30:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dgitto (2017-11-14 12:42:25+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
mavl (2018-12-25 19:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Noen (2017-11-16 20:27:59+00:00): Er det både en St1 og Shell stasjon her, eller har Shell tatt over for St1?
mavl (2018-12-25 21:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
scai (2017-11-15 15:07:43+00:00): Hi Carson_gor,

I'm scai (from https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/60605/the-item-of-point-did-not-show-at-the-map).

I saw that you are creating overlapping buildings. This is not correct. Please don't add buildings inside other buildings. If you need to split buildings up then at least delete the old ones.

Regards
Alex
Carson_gor (2017-11-15 15:30:11+00:00): Thx for chacking my new tag.
And Can you show me how to edit it in the right way ?
Coz i cant find a good way to edit it.
Only this is a good present in the map.
Carson_gor (2017-11-15 15:32:00+00:00): As the topic i start, the building also have different part in it and have a different names.
scai (2017-11-15 15:57:45+00:00): Take a look at the surrounding buildings. The exact solution depends on the building architecture which is hard to see from the aerial imagery. If the building has a hole then you need to create a multipolygon relation as done here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4103865
Unfortunately I don't have much experience with editor iD (I use JOSM instead) so I can't tell you how to create multipolygon relations in iD.
Carson_gor (2017-11-16 06:42:27+00:00): this two buildings have 2 floors on the base to link three blocks,those blocks have 5 floors separately. So if i doing wrong, How to I fix in correct way to show those blocks?
scai (2017-11-16 07:58:26+00:00): The 3D architecture is not really relevant. From a 2D perspective (top down) this is one building, similar to the outline of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306784937.

If the building parts have different names then you may split it accordingly. But don't create overlapping outlines. Touching outlines are fine.
Carson_gor (2017-11-16 09:52:24+00:00): i had think to split that part,but as i told you, the Big building is have his name.
If I split those building, it will missing the name of big building.
so, do you have good way to solve it ?
Carson_gor (2017-11-16 10:20:15+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53836370

I mark a new outline you can check it,I did it like the multipolygon.
scai (2017-11-16 18:44:53+00:00): Sorry, that's not really correct. You need to create a multipolygon. This is a special element type in OSM, called a relation.

Here is an explanation how to create a multipolygon with editor iD: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/22542/how-do-i-map-an-island-in-a-lake-using-id-editor-and-the-multipolygon-tag/34123

Short version:
- draw a single outline area
- draw one or multiple inner areas
- select both (using shift-click)
- right click on the outline and select the "+" (merge) or press "c"
scai (2017-11-16 18:48:13+00:00): Such complex structures require a little more practice in OSM. If this is too hard for you then you could ask someone with more experience to create these multipolygon relations for you.
scai (2017-11-16 19:18:21+00:00): If you like you can also try a different OSM editor: JOSM (http://josm.openstreetmap.de/).

JOSM is more complex than iD. However it makes editing of complex structures (such as multipolygons) easier than iD, in my opinion.
Carson_gor (2017-11-17 04:07:19+00:00): It is ok with you say the function is Merge.
Coz I haven't find the name Multipolygons on ID. I will fix those building using the Merge function.Thx a lot
nevw (2017-11-14 12:06:39+00:00): I reverted OTB Products Pty Ltd changeset due to a busstop being shifted to incorrect location and road being extended incorrectly across school buildings during spammy adding of business details.
nevw (2017-11-14 12:07:30+00:00): The details of what went astray are here:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53765762
3vivekb (2017-11-14 09:59:16+00:00): This reverted #53765186
mavl (2018-12-25 20:40:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
3vivekb (2017-11-14 09:54:04+00:00): This was another bad upload.  I didn't know how to handle the differential in properties properly.  It was reverted by me in  #53766348.
majid1359 (2017-11-14 09:37:52+00:00): شیرینی آردین و بانک ملت اضافه گردد
HubMiner (2022-01-20 01:20:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5227872321/history

Hi, this looks like a bad merge of two places, could you check?
highflyer74 (2017-11-15 16:01:49+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!
 
Hier ist ein klein wenig etwas schief gelaufen... Adressdaten werden nicht an Wege getaggt, sondern an z.B. ein Haus.

Zufahrten zu einem Privatgrundstück werden als highway=service und ggf service=driveway getaggt. Das war auch vorher korrekt erfasst.

Was ist denn Deine Absicht gewesen bzw. was wolltest Du verbessern?

Viele Grüße aus HB!
team-jordan (2017-11-15 16:32:20+00:00): Hallo,

meine Adresse lautet Hauptstr. 2a. Diese ist aber nicht zu finden. Wir haben hier an unserer Zufahrt ein offizielles Straßenschild stehen mit Hauptstr. 2a, 2b. Dies ist zwar eine Grundstückszufahrt, aber wohl aufgrund dessen nicht zu finden. In sämtlichen Karten werden wir dem benachbarten Langenberg zugeschlagen. Bei Google ist die Adresse sogar am anderen Ende des Dorfes verzeichnet. Wäre schön, wenn das so einzutragen wäre, das es stimmt. Bitte um Feedback.

Nette Grüße aus Borgdorf
BeKri (2017-11-15 18:53:52+00:00): Na dann soll Dir mal geholft werden ...
Los geht es eigentlich, dass man erst mal die Hausumrisse einzeichnet, weil eins is ja 2a, ein anderes 2b, irgendwo sollte noch 2 sein.
Ich hab jetzt mal welche eingezeichnet und die Adressdaten PAUSCHAL auf alle 3 aus meiner Sicht möglichen Häuser verteilt.
DEINE Aufgabe wäre jetzt die Hausnummern richtig zu verteilen/ die Einträge passend zu machen.
DANN sollte einem suchen und finden eigentlich nichts mehr im Wege stehen.
Gruss aus dem Süden derBeKri
3vivekb (2017-11-14 09:54:59+00:00): I am reverting my own upload - #53765874 only added nodes but not the ways that connected them.
eggie (2017-11-14 10:35:53+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
nevw (2017-11-14 11:51:20+00:00): Hi
I added highway=service otherwise it will not render.
I think you intended to show that the roads are private access only.
I expect these are the tags to give the result you wanted.
access=no
highway=service
service=driveway
mapper999 (2018-07-28 12:12:12+00:00): Hallo Rafiki,
ich habe hier gerade die Straßen wieder gerade gerückt und die gelöschten Flächen wiederhergestellt. Bitte in Zukunft solche kurzfristigen Baustellen nur eintragen, wenn du tatsächlich auch sicherstellen kannst, dass die Baustelle nach Beendigung wieder zurückgeändert wieder. Leider kommt es immer wieder vor, dass Baustellen, die eigentlich nur wenige Wochen oder Monate dauern, monate- oder jahrelang in der Datenbank bleiben, weil sich niemand darum gekümmert hat, die Baustelle auch wieder aus OSM zu entfernen.
Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen!
mapper999
nevw (2017-11-14 13:33:37+00:00): Can you fix it right the tagging of the opening hours format thanks.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples
eggie (2017-11-14 11:05:39+00:00): footway=sidewalk kun je eraf halen. dat is hier niet het geval. Doe je het zelf?
JBacc1 (2017-11-20 19:34:20+00:00): Bonsoir Truchin,
Je me suis permis de supprimer le sentier qui descend du Puy de la Mey. Après passage sur place, le chemin est inexistant sur le terrain. Le souci avec Strava, c'est que les VTTistes se passent parfois de chemin pour se balader !
JB.
Truchin (2017-11-20 20:46:00+00:00): C'est une bonne chose ta suppression.
Par contre c'est surprenant que les vvtistes même sans chemin passent toujours pile au même endroit 😊
JBacc1 (2017-11-21 10:37:53+00:00): Avec Strava, il y a des explications possibles : 
 - une bande de VTTiste en sortie,
 - un VTTiste du dimanche qui refait régulièrement la même sortie,
 - et je crois qu'ils ont un genre de « défi », genre, « et toi, t'es capable de faire comme moi ? ».
JBacc1 (2017-11-21 10:38:36+00:00): Au fait, ça peut peut-être t'intéresser : 
http://randocarto.fr/demo/Puys_255_1095_400dpi.png
eggie (2017-11-14 11:08:00+00:00): Tip: Als achtergrond kun je de luchtfoto kadaster pdok 2016 instellen. Daar liggen de wegen ook precies goed. (Bing is soms recenter, maar ligt verschoven)
nevw (2017-11-14 11:42:22+00:00): I reverted your edit because you accidentally moved the Toyota Dealership to wrong area and added 2 nodes with different tags for your business.  One node was for addr:housenumber 7 and the other addr:housenumber 730. You can view what went astray here http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53767076
eggie (2017-11-14 11:11:16+00:00): Oke.. goede edits allemaal. Dat pand van Stach rendert niet meer op de mapnik. Ik zal het in een zgn. multipolygon=relatie zetten. Dan zie je het weer.
Dat kan alleen makkelijk met editor JOSM.. Een aanrader mocht je willen doorzetten met OSM. editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
user_5359 (2017-11-14 17:28:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards /debit_cards.
Mike Baggaley (2017-12-12 17:07:00+00:00): HI, I notice you have updated way 135322328  as part of this change. It appears to have designation=public_bridleway, but horse=no and foot=no, which doesn't seem like a valid combination. I realise these values predate your change, but if you are local, can you check whether this is really a public bridleway and update the access rights and or designation as appropriate?

Thanks,
Mike
AJR-GB (2017-12-12 19:18:55+00:00): Hi Mike, I am local and will do but will be in the new year as I am traveling until then. Thanks
eggie (2017-11-14 13:46:59+00:00): Welkom bij OSM http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Please don't add addresses in OSM. .use the present address-nodes at the buidlings. I merged info with addressnode.


MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
freeExec (2017-11-14 12:48:28+00:00): Какой зоны нет? Зачем удалили тротуар?
Дмитрий2йфффф (2017-11-14 12:50:16+00:00): Пешеходная зона перекрывает выезды из дворов, судя по карте, хотя там проложена просто дорога
freeExec (2017-11-14 12:53:28+00:00): Что значит перекрывает? Там обычный тротуар параллельно улице.
Дмитрий2йфффф (2017-11-14 12:55:30+00:00): Тротуар был прорисован не раздельно, тем самым выезд из двора считался не дорогой, а так же тротуаром
freeExec (2017-11-14 12:59:44+00:00): Так надо не удалять, а сделать правильно, если вы считаете, что там что-то не так.
Дмитрий2йфффф (2017-11-14 13:00:18+00:00): Не успел исправить просто
freeExec (2017-11-14 13:04:22+00:00): А по факту, там просто один из выездом не был соединён с дорогой.
GerdP (2017-11-15 07:56:53+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed that you used highway=bridge for a few ways crossing waterways. The usual way is to give the bridge the tag bridge=yes. 
Typically you have either a highway=* + bridge=yes + layer=1
or waterway=* + tunnel=culvert + layer=-1
in this situation.
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
GerdP (2017-11-15 07:59:02+00:00): One more link:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterways#Man-made_structures
eggie (2017-11-14 13:50:16+00:00): Beste cameijer.. Graag op de adresnodes bijtaggen.
Supaplex (2018-01-21 05:06:15+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。


編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features


台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/


Happy Mapping!
Peilscheibe (2017-12-21 16:46:18+00:00): please see my comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53768737
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-16 07:02:48+00:00): It seems you have stripped all tags from the Macdonalds branch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1315999233
.
Is this an error?
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-16 07:08:16+00:00): Hi, you added a bus stop which does not exist in the Israel GTFS database. Interestingly, you also added a "gtfs:id". Could you explain what that stop is, and where did the "gtfs:id" come from? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803060264
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-23 11:18:02+00:00): Sorry, my mistake.
.
It appears the user has simply re-added a stop which was removed by the last incremental update, preserving its original gtfs:id. I have removed the gtfs:id, since this stop is not in GTFS anymore. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54023611
eggie (2017-11-14 13:55:23+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd..
wambacher (2017-11-14 13:35:36+00:00): no "living streets"
andrewsh (2018-03-06 16:33:54+00:00): Hi,

You seem to have added a lot of meaningless tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507084935/history…

Please check the data you upload to make sure this doesn't happen in future :)

Thanks!
eggie (2017-11-14 13:52:33+00:00): Oke... correct.
wambacher (2017-11-14 13:29:11+00:00): wrong: that are nor oneways
not residential (nobody living there) but highway=service
chnav (2017-11-14 15:41:52+00:00): Location in the middle of nowhere. POI deleted.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
chnav (2017-11-14 15:45:55+00:00): Все ваши 5 правок удалены т.к. нарисованы несуществующие объекты. Пожалуйста не мусорьте на карте, это серьёзный проект.
Peilscheibe (2017-12-21 16:21:08+00:00): Hi Jose-san, welcome to OSM.
I reverted your edits due to the following reason: the lanes-tag is counting the lanes used for motorized traffic, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes

Please, prior to such edits, consult the wiki to learn how things are done in OSM.
As a start, I'm providing some useful links:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/help
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap
http://learnosm.org/de/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to ask or maybe you're interested in joining the Stuttgart OSM community:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stuttgart/Stammtisch
http://lists.openstreetmap.de/mailman/listinfo/stuttgart

Best regards, P.
wambacher (2017-11-14 13:22:19+00:00): Hi, 

wrong, wrong wrong.

That is no building, and the other "buldings" too
wambacher (2017-11-14 13:24:42+00:00): plese use landuse for an area of buildings.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:41:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
nevw (2017-11-14 13:28:59+00:00): You appear to have deleted part of the gazetted boundary of the state forest that runs closely parallel to the right of Barakula Road. If you zoom in close on the Digiglobe imagery you can see a line following the portion you have deleted - possibly a fence line or powerline that is gazetted to be outside of the forestry boundary.
porjo (2017-11-15 09:56:51+00:00): @nevw yes you're right - my guess would be powerline, but I'm not sure. If you look at the source boundary data from Queensland State Government, there are similar such corridors all over the place which aren't part of the OSM data. So this corridor was a bit of an anomaly in that sense.
nevw (2017-11-15 11:09:41+00:00): I prefer to have the lines mapped as they are gazetted. The corridors are outside of the the boundary being mapped and often indicate current or planned infrastructure reserved areas or section that are managed by some entity and mapping the excluded parts is useful information too.
I notice that others like nothing better that too 'tidy up' such bits, but I feel that if you have the geometry in a shapefile or similar then you should enter the boundary into OSM as gazetted. If you are manually adding such data click by click on such a big scale, as I expect much of the earlier info was, then I would think it is not really practical to do so and makes sense to leave the finer details to a latter mapper who has more accurate and complete information and can replace the earlier geometry. 
I also feel if someone earlier has added detailed and correct info previously then a later mapper should refrain from deleting it without good reason.
It is mostly in recent years that detailed geometry in the form such as shapefiles is being made available for us to use so that eventually we will end up with a high resolution of the features.
But osm is a collaborative effort by many mappers and my 2c doesn't count for much in such things  :)
Keep on mapping.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:43:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:39:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:57:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:31:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].