piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bicycle Tourer (2022-10-16 09:29:17+00:00): Many thanks for your hints. I have not used the PT-Plugin itself yet, but the relation-editor offerssome similar functionality: "Painting" the whole relation in purple (which makes the whole bus route visible) or sorting the relation (which sometimes makes it worse, when the route still contains both directions). I will try it, when the next busroute has to be duplicated ... .Regarding splitting I agree to the (few) cases above, where splitting is unavoidable. Anyway, many thanks, I think we can close this conversation. Bicycle Tourer.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-08 08:30:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102378608

surface=tarmac? is it an actual tarmacadan? In such case surface=tarmacadan may be a better less confused term (tarmac is widely used for asphalt and concrete surfaces)

Or is it just a regular asphalt surface? Then surface=asphalt would be better

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=tarmac for some documentation
Frans S (2022-10-12 13:54:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. We welcome you as a new mapper.
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks as requested. 
We do not expect errorless mapping from a new mapper but your mapping quality need more attention.
Please pay attention to next points:
The imagery is very clear. you see also the sidewalls on many buildings. Do not include them into your mapping as well the shadow next to it. 
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127257609
Frans S (2022-10-12 13:57:26+00:00): Hello again. See my comments on changeset 127257609/ They are valid here as well.
Again, a very clear imagery. You map buildings just as rectangular, (not squared) and do not follow the rooflines. Often the buildings have extensions which you do not include either.
Please pay more attention to accurate mapping.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127257727
user4816003805 (2022-11-05 05:59:45+00:00): Hi publicerination,

Why did you delete the building tag for
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256045019/history ?

The pitches you've drawn aren't at ground level, but are located on the roof of the building, which can be seen in
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=821645018742073

The building that used to be San Francisco Cooking School
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256045022/history)
was correct before, but now contains adjacent buildings seen in
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=427952082062611

Let me know if you'd like to fix this.
Otherwise, I can go ahead and revert the building shapes but keep the pitches you've added.

Thanks!
spughetti (2022-11-05 08:50:55+00:00): Hi user4816003805,

Sorry, I had assumed that the the building=yes tag had been placed by accident and that the pitches were at ground level. 

I don't remember exactly how everything was tagged before my edit, so if you could revert the changeset that'd be great.

Thank you for your comment,
Erin
user4816003805 (2022-11-05 23:59:58+00:00): Hi Erin,

No problem.

I kept the pitches but reverted the buildings to their previous shapes in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128539666

But the previous shapes were also slightly wrong, so I refined the shapes and added details in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128540104

Thanks again.
Happy mapping!
spughetti (2022-11-06 12:37:56+00:00): 😸👍
aceman444 (2022-10-09 16:59:51+00:00): Pardon, zdroj je ESRI snimky a ZBGIS katastralna mapa.
mariotomo (2022-10-10 11:58:54+00:00): esta edición se refiere a la retroalimentación recibida en https://github.com/OSMLatam/pow/issues/4 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62706557.
sigue sin respuesta la pregunta sobre la información numérica.
mariotomo (2022-10-12 22:58:10+00:00): seguramente te sirve revisar el resultado de mi investigación.
https://github.com/OSMLatam/pow/issues/4#issuecomment-1276812290

por cuanto, si tu fuente era esa, nos hubieras ahorrado mucho tiempo, simplemente informando al resto de la comunidad OSM.
Frans S (2022-10-13 12:17:49+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127258929
josmougn (2025-05-07 21:58:51+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez dans ce changeset et le 127259463 une quarantaine de points avec seulement 2 tags : "
    operator = Enedis
    operator:wikidata = Q3587594 "
Est-ce que vous pouvez les compléter ?
Merci.
InfosReseaux (2025-05-07 22:38:47+00:00): Bonsoir

En effet ça a du passer les filtres des traitements de maintenance.
C'est corrigé : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165959866
josmougn (2025-05-07 23:09:32+00:00): c'est vite fait !
Duški Kubov (2026-05-07 13:00:00+00:00): Ahoj,
rád by som sa opýtal, odkiaľ ste určili, že v lokalite Moyzesova ide o psí park? Žiadne prvky tomu nijako nenaznačujú (napr. označenie, oplotenie, herné prvky pre zvieratá a pod.)? Ďakujem za odpoveď.
Waffelo (2026-07-03 13:51:04+00:00): Je to zatial take ludove a neoficialne miesto pre vencenie psov. Ale hovori sa o vytvoreni psieho parku na tomto mieste. Bolo o to nejake to usilie a myslim ze este bude.

Myslim ze by bolo lepsie zatial pridat nejaky proposed alebo informal tag.
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-09 20:36:16+00:00): Are the opening hours based on local knowledge / survey? We can't straight up copy from tripadvisor, google, etc. as you know.

Also, since it's a seasonal POI, I would suggest the following
- add "May-Sep: " to opening hours, this will specify 'only between these months' (last month included).
- remove seasonal=yes
b-unicycling (2022-10-09 21:01:44+00:00): Opening hours from instagram, as they were not signed on the horsebox: https://www.instagram.com/the.shebean/
☆Finvenkulo (2022-10-10 20:23:39+00:00): Próbowałem poprawić odnośnik, ale nie da się tego zrobić w edytorze iD: "; " jest automatycznie zastępowany przez ";".
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-10 20:53:18+00:00): U mnie jak wcisnę link to się otwiera obrazek.
☆Finvenkulo (2022-10-10 21:10:08+00:00): Po mojej edycji edytorze Level0. Sprawdź proszę wersję 10 linii 133001893: próbuje otworzyć się nieistniejący na Commons plik "File:Jesień w Parku Sieleckim;Most nad Czarną Przemszą;Sosnowiec, 2019.jpg".
stimoroll (2022-10-10 21:21:58+00:00): Wygląda, ze wszystko jest ok.
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-11 17:25:37+00:00): W wersji 10 fakt. Nie działa ale już poprawiłeś z tego co widzę i jest w porządku.
Frans S (2022-10-13 12:20:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
You tagged a few buildings with text 'open area ....'  Tag those buildings as building=construction.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127259985
gdt (2025-06-21 00:49:05+00:00): This is a bench with name=Amenity.  I didn't see any bench names today.  ok to assume that's a mistake in tagging and clean it up?
gdt (2025-07-08 16:33:32+00:00): name dropped, nevermind
IlBano (2022-12-30 14:09:56+00:00): Ciao Ale.
Questo tratto di SP74
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696719108
è veramente tutta a senso unico ?

Il dubbio mi nasce dal fatto che si tratta di una parte extraurbana che in più si connette a sud ad una rotatoria con penduncoli di accesso sia in uscita che ingresso.

Grazie

Ciao
IlBano
Ale_Zena_IT (2022-12-30 16:49:49+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
direi proprio di no (ed ecco qui la prova https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=40.54574450000004&lng=17.814751800002&z=18.976028142654297&pKey=455525193251706&focus=photo che scattai a ottobre) Non capisco come mi è scappato il tag oneway. Correggo subito, grazie per la segnalazione
PT-53 (2022-10-15 18:49:07+00:00): Hallo aelbler,
Du hast an diesem OSM-Objekt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374930886#map=16/48.1087/9.5451
die Merkmale
- bicycle=yes
- tracktype=grade2
ergänzt.
Diese Linie ist aber nicht der Radweg von Dürmentingen nach Seelenwald. Dieser ist hier:
-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110959309/history
Das sind zwei verschiedene OSM-Objekte.
Schau Dir das nochmal genauer an.
Grüße

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110959309/history
PT-53 (2022-10-23 06:51:19+00:00): Hallo aelbler,
ich würde mich noch über eine Antwort freuen.
Grüße
aelbler (2022-10-23 08:24:26+00:00): Hallo, das mag sein, aber die alte Bahnstrecke ist für das Fahrrad hervorragend geeignet, deshalb bicycle=yes. 
Viele Grüße
PT-53 (2022-10-23 08:54:15+00:00): Hallo aelbler,
ich wiederhole, das 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110959309/history#map=16/48.1107/9.5479
ist der Radweg von Dürmentingen nach Seelenwald und mit ziemlicher Sicherheit auch die "alte Bahnstecke".

Das 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374930886/history#map=15/48.1030/9.5452
soll den Verlauf der alten Bahnstrecke darstellen, ist aber mit ziemlicher Sicherheit teilweise falsch eingezeichnet.

Ich fahre da mehrmals im Jahr und kenne das Gelände recht gut.
Ich habe daher Deine Änderungen zurückgesetzt.
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-10-23 15:56:31+00:00): Hallo aelbler, 
Du hast jetzt zwischenzeitlich 
- bicycle=yes
an diesem Weg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110959309/history
ergänzt.
Was soll das bezwecken?
Bei einem Service-Weg ist Radfahren ja nicht verboten!
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
Fragende Grüße
GinaroZ (2022-10-09 18:41:04+00:00): Fixed it as it looks like you made the whole thing a lake :) Select both the big area and the area to cut out, then press C to combine.
SzymonH (2022-10-09 19:06:18+00:00): Dodany reaktor jądrowy, serio? W całości nadaje się do wycofania.
NieWnen (2022-10-09 19:10:38+00:00): Wycofane
tastrax (2022-10-24 02:50:48+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
NorthCrab (2023-01-06 13:35:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2082992971
Co rozumiesz przez "to nie jest szybowisko"? Że tego wierzchołka tam nie ma czy jest ale pod inną nazwą?
maraf24 (2023-01-06 17:35:29+00:00): Szybowisko to nazwa urzędowa góry i szczytu. PRNG lokalizuje szczyt w tym miejscu. ISOK potwierdza istnienie szczytu.
Tomasz Paprodziad (2023-01-06 18:33:01+00:00): Serio "Szybowisko" - zawsze to była "Góra Szybowcowa"
kubahahaha (2023-01-06 19:03:28+00:00): Szybowcowa Góra jest zaznaczona tu obok
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4718567010
maraf24 (2023-01-06 19:48:59+00:00): Przy czym Szybowcowa Góra to jest nazwa niestandaryzowana, z wywiadu terenowego.
Na isok widać ją jako osobny szczyt.
Tomasz Paprodziad (2023-01-07 22:55:33+00:00): Ok, ten szczyt jest zarośnięty krzakami - sądziłem, że ktoś to pomylił z Górą Szybowcową lub wpisał Szybowisko jako obiekt funkcjonalny - (szybowce startują/lądują z Góry Sz.  - wszystko jasne - pozdrawiam
silversurfer83 (2024-09-28 16:11:40+00:00): Moinsen :)

der HInweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4209821 hat mich mal in die Geschichte gucken lassen. Du hast hier einen Feldweg raus gemacht. War das Absicht?

cheers
silversurfer83 (2024-10-08 18:09:54+00:00): Wenn du es nicht mehr weißt wäre eine Antwort trotzdem nett :)
iooner (2022-10-09 18:19:53+00:00): Source : https://www.belle-ile.be/siteassets/pdf/plan_26082022.pdf
eggie (2022-10-10 15:22:28+00:00): Adrie.. je vraagt feedback.. 

Wat er niet meer is kan inderdaad weg. 
Het is al door een medemapper omgezet naar landuse=construction. Daar zou je nog aan kunnen toevoegen construction=residential

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-10 15:25:24+00:00): Op het gebouw zat ook nog een relatie omdat er ook 'inner' was .. Die had je er beter af kunnen halen eerst. Die inner zal ik nog verwijderen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 10:28:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10087594912/history has 2=1 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Marek-M (2022-10-10 06:36:06+00:00): Cześć, dlaczego zamiast crossing:island=yes na przejściu dla pieszych rozbijasz prostą drogę na dwie jezdnie? Rozumiem, że takie rozwiązanie dokładniej odzwierciedla sytuację drogową ale powoduje dodatkowe komplikacje przy kolejnych edycjach tej drogi (chociażby więcej pracy przy relacjach). z punktu widzenia routingu pojedyncza nitka drogi będzie tak samo skuteczna.

Daj znać, czy nie będzie dla Ciebie problemem, gdy to przejście dla pieszych uproszczę :) Dzięki!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127263407
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-09 19:28:26+00:00): Dėl tourism=attraction aš abejoju, mano galva tai nėra turizmo traukos objektas...
MindaugasS (2022-10-09 20:42:39+00:00): Na, gal tikrai nelabai didelis. Tą žymą nukopijavau nuo analogiško saulės laikrodžio prie Pūčkorių gatvės. Pakeiskit savo nuožiūra.
eggie (2022-10-09 21:08:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Svp geen adressen aanmaken in OSM.
Huis Rheiderstein is geen kasteel, maar een landhuis. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcastle


Wellicht historic=manor
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmanor



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-09 21:23:02+00:00): Wanneer je castle wil gebruiken dan kun je evt
castle_type=manor toevoegen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:castle_type

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-10-09 21:31:55+00:00): Ook een mogelijkheid?
castle_type =stately 	Stately home. Representative building without functional defenses. Sometimes rebuilt from former defensive structures.
eggie (2022-10-10 08:13:40+00:00): De kastelen heb ik zo veel mogelijk aangepast naar landhuis.
eggie (2022-10-09 21:14:24+00:00): Dag Joost
Wellicht Rhienderen Werkt!  
Philadelphia is wellicht de operator?

Kijk eens bij amenity=social_facility
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-09 21:17:19+00:00): Tip Gebruik de adresnodes.
Dit valt eigenlijk onder historische buitenplaats .
historic=manor
Dat is iets anders dan een kasteel.

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-09 21:18:20+00:00): historische buitenplaats 

historic=manor

Gebruik svp de adresnode

Het huis heeft geen Engelse naam.

MVG
eggie
NorthCrab (2023-01-12 05:33:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10087651224/history
Nie nadawaj obiektom nazw opisowych, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
eggie (2022-10-09 21:20:02+00:00): historic=manor met bijbehorend landgoed denk ik.
Geen kasteel. 
Gebruik svp de adresnode om op bij te taggen. 
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
balint36 (2022-10-09 19:45:25+00:00): There are offical sources says "Ferencváros C elágazás" does not exists.

https://www.kapella2.hu/map
Frans S (2022-10-13 12:26:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127265318
gruenfuss (2022-10-16 22:05:00+00:00): Bestätige das =)
*Martin* (2022-12-01 17:23:41+00:00): waterway=* a natural=valley nemaju byt na tej istej way. Kopa pripadov v okoli RK, kde takto inac bezmenny potok dedi nazov z nazvu doliny.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
Yury Yatsynovich (2022-10-20 10:36:45+00:00): Еще раз, большая просьба: пожалуйста, обоснуйте превод данных населённых пунктов из village в town? 

Если вы оставляете замечания других участников проекта без ответа, ваши правки могут быть откатаны.
alies' (2022-10-25 13:06:52+00:00): Поселки городского типа ближе к городу, чем к деревне. Также многие г.п. уже до меня были обозначены как город (Вороново, Зельва, Шарковщина и т.д.). Таким образом г.п. будут отличаться от обычных деревень. К сожалению в OSM нет тега для городских поселков, поэтому считаю нужным переставить на town
Yury Yatsynovich (2022-10-25 20:10:09+00:00): Для официальных статусов (типа "посёлок" или "городской посёлок") есть тэг official_status. 

Но вообще при изменении тэгов желательно руководствоваться некими принятыми договорённостями, нежели менять тэги по собственному усмотрению. 

В РБ де-факто используется критерий изложенный  на русскоязычной станице вики -- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:place%3Dtown

Если вы хотите изменить критерий тэгирования населенных пунктов, предлагаю сначала обсудить это с белорусским сообществом, например, здесь -- https://t.me/byosm
*abq* (2022-11-04 17:11:25+00:00): Hallo Singletrailmap, 
bitte füge kein bicycle=designated an MTB Trails an. Das gehört nur an benutzungspflichtige Radwege. Die Access tags waren hier alle richtig gesetzt, ich habe von daher deine Änderungen und Verkomplizierungen am access rückgängig gemacht.
Frans S (2022-10-14 12:45:38+00:00): Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Roads in settlements in rural areas can be tagged as path, small, or unclassfied. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway ---
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127266776
ssundell (2022-10-17 11:44:21+00:00): Moi! Sen verran kommentoisin, että service-tyyppisellä tiellähän pyöräily sinällään on sallittua, joten sitä ei tarvitse erikseen merkata.

Jos tarkoituksena on merkitä erikseen pyöräily sallituksi esim. Wandrer.earthia varten - mitä sinällään pidän kyllä ihan sallittuna, ja soveltuvissa kohdissa vallan toivottavana - pitäisin hyvänä, että ollaan aika tarkkana sen suhteen, mihin tuo pyöräily merkitään sallituksi. Nyt esimerkiksi yksi näistä muutetuista teistä tuo pohjoisin näyttää tekevän ympyrän jonkun pihalla, jossa varmaan lähtökohtaisesti ei ole tarkoitus pyöräillä? Useampi muukin johtaa pihaan, jolloin ainakin se loppupää pitäisi merkitä erikseen esim. drivewayksi, jolloin se ei Wandreriin päädy.

Esimerkiksi tuossa pohjoisimmassa on tietysti ihan validia, että pyöräily on merkitty esimerkiksi Sorkkalantieltä tuohon tiehen liittyvälle polulle asti. Se alapuolella oleva track-tyyppinen tie on taas jo mielestäni hiukan ongelmallinen, koska se kuitenkin kulkee selvästi pihapiirissä, vaikka ei ihan asuintalon ikkunoiden alla taida ollakaan.

Toinen huomio: "unclassified" -tyyppi tarkoittaa käytännössä yleisesti katua tai pikkutietä - sellaista, jolla kulkee vaikkapa jonkun asuinalueen läpikulkuliikenne; pienemmät kadut (tai tiet) joiden varrella on asutusta, ovat tyypillisesti residential -tyyppisiä.

Olin näköjään itse asettanut tuolle muuttamallesi tielle tyypiksi "service", mikä tarkoittaa siis yleisesti ottaen pientä tietä, joka vie johonkin kohteeseen - yksittäiselle rakennukselle tai vaikka linkkimastolle. En ole itse tuolla ajellut, eli perustuu ihan MML:n tietoihin, mutta tuo service-tyyppi on sille valkkautunut siksi, että sekin näyttää johtavan asuintalon pihaan.