piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
geow (2021-11-05 22:26:15+00:00): Danke Thomas für die Bilder! 
Die Tafel mit der Karte sieht auf den ersten Blick ziemlich offiziell aus, außer dass kein Urheber/Verantwortlicher angeben ist. An dieser Stelle (Abzweig mit dem Tor lt geotags) gibt's keine Tafel mehr, auch keine sonstigen Hinweise auf ein Wildschutzgebiet weit und breit. Das Tor war offen, die Forststraße führt zu einer größeren Wildfütterung. https://www.dropbox.com/s/pr7a3rpksgysat1/IMG_8857.jpg 

Der DAV-Wegweiser zeigt nur noch einen Hinweis auf Holzarbeiten am Goldtropfsteig, die aber auch schon fast 1 Jahr beendet sind :-)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vpg93xp42bfo9j0/IMG_8780.jpg

Ich vermute, das LRA oder Forstamt hat da mal Tacheles geredet. Ich tendiere dazu, das "Wildschutzgebiet" zu löschen, warte aber noch auf eine Antwort des LRA zu dieser Art von Freilandtierhaltung. Wärst du damit einverstanden?

Glückauf
geow
mueschel (2020-08-25 15:21:28+00:00): Please explain this upload. All these objects don't have any useful tags, only:
    Comments=.
    Polygon_ID=35818.0
    RoadConn_1=Disconnected segments

This looks like some data from a QA tool, but nothing that should be in the OSM database.
LH3208 (2020-09-24 19:59:41+00:00): Will this be published?
SomeoneElse (2020-09-24 20:57:37+00:00): Hello,
Yes, changes you make are added to the map data immediately.
You've removed the "highway=service" tag here, so your change will have the effect of removing it from map renderings, which has already happened to the "standard" tiles that I'm looking at from openstreetmap.org.
Regards,
Andy
LH3208 (2020-09-24 19:57:15+00:00): These New Street Names and addresses have gone live in our emergency service system and the USPS.  Are they going to become valid in this system?
LH3208 (2020-09-24 19:58:16+00:00): This one is live in the County Emergency system and USPS.  Can you tell me if this is going to be published??
marc__marc (2020-12-03 15:23:06+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300305232
est-ce vraiement un bureau de poste ou uniquement l'endroit oü la poste trie le courrier ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Lio_971 (2021-01-17 01:25:41+00:00): Bonjour Marc, 
C'est géré par la poste elle même. 
Cordialement.
Boguś z Polska (2020-08-24 20:52:35+00:00): Mam nadzieję, że dodałem poprawny znacznik access=no
user_7581226 (2020-08-29 21:27:28+00:00): Hallo Markus,
wir sollten als Straßennamen nur offizielle Namen eingetragen. Eine "Litzelfeldener Gerade", gibt es in St. Johann als Straßennamen nicht, ich lasse diese Bezeichnung aber mal so stehen. Danke für Deinen Input. Lg Johann
gscholz (2020-10-29 07:40:38+00:00): Hi Carlos,
you have added several tracks in recent times which are not connected to other ways, so they are not usable by routing programs  (see the red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-55.52774&lat=-26.31149&zoom=8&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

As you are a regular user and obviously commited to quality, I would like to ask if you can support me and review your local area regularly with OSMI to keep the error level low?

Kind regards
Guido
abakus_uploader (2020-08-24 22:39:45+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
stephankn (2021-04-11 21:35:23+00:00): Could you please give details where exactly your business is? What kind of business is it?
DaveF (2020-08-25 14:46:51+00:00): Hi
There is already a railway=station tag.
GB stations are all mapped (as nodes).
philiprowlands (2020-08-25 14:56:31+00:00): Ah, apologies for this. I noticed in the iD editor that it simply appears as "Building", so "Train Station" seemed a closer match.
skquinn (2020-08-24 22:10:56+00:00): Please add comments to your changesets, so others have an idea what you changed without having to download the data and piece it together themselves. Even a short phrase like "Improved road alignment" is a huge improvement over absolutely nothing.
stevea (2020-08-30 01:54:53+00:00): The CORRECT and PREFERRED work to do here would NOT have been to WHOLLY change lots of highway=trunk to highway=primary.  There are many places along here which ARE highway=trunk (three- or four-lane, divided higher-speed > 50 MPH / 80 km/h.

Are you going to take the time and effort to tag which are which?  You should!  If you don't, somebody else is going to have to come in and  fine tune your very large edit (it is also blithely inaccurate, ignoring true nuances in the local roadway).

MAP!  Please don't make massive changes like this when going too far in another direction is also a poor or even downright bad edit, like this one.  If you are going to take the time to correct something, do the detail work required, don't "hit and run" the whole thing in a single ribbon, as it isn't.
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2021-03-17 16:21:12+00:00): Dzień dobry syntex,
Cieszę się, że zajmujesz się mapowaniem bliskiej mi okolicy. Jednak wydaje mi się, że przesunąłeś, przypadkowo lub nie, budynki przy Zamiany 8 i 10. Obecnie, nie pokrywają się one ani z podkładem ortofotomapy, ani z podkładem budynków. Dodatkowo, salon Livia znalazł się teraz poza obrysem budynku i przez to stracił swój adres.
Proszę, czy mógłbyś to skorygować?
pozdrawiam
Grzegorz Kujawa
syntex (2021-03-17 18:37:43+00:00): Poprawiłem cały kwartał
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2021-03-17 20:01:16+00:00): Super! Dziękuję.
nevw (2020-08-25 07:49:32+00:00): Hi
there appears to be a self-intersection problem created here.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.02235&lat=-27.46787&zoom=18
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=89879650#20/-27.46834/153.02374
Tks
Warin61 (2020-08-25 10:18:11+00:00): Hi nevw!
I think the repositioning of the northern buss stop by ~ 4m has thrown it out... possibly the platform needs to be bigger?
nevw (2020-08-27 12:11:03+00:00): Hi Dantine
Are you able to check the layout here in person?
If not, I will correct the geometry site unseen, as only a minor fix anyway.
Dantine (2020-08-27 12:42:53+00:00): I thought I had corrected this just before? Let me know if the fix doesn't work out. It's hard to get a sense of the actual position underground so I put my faith in the GTFS location and extended the layer -1 platform around it.
nevw (2020-08-27 12:59:46+00:00): Ok, thanks
I only checked via the osmi site and it ran just before your edit.
Thanks for fixing.
Nev
Dantine (2020-08-27 15:30:56+00:00): No problem, thanks for picking it up.
maraf24 (2020-09-23 07:43:01+00:00): Sprawdzasz te importy z tym co widać na Ortofotomapie?
Dwa budynki, które tu dodałeś, zostały lata temu wyburzone.
Arnebius (2020-09-23 10:04:02+00:00): Sprawdzam, dlatego moje paczki importu dotyczą małych obszarów, poza orto sprawdzam jeszcze z egibem starostwa, jeśli masz aktualniejsze dane to popraw.
maraf24 (2020-09-24 09:45:45+00:00): No to nie wiem jak przebiega to sprawdzanie, bo tu przez jeden z budynków przechodził chodnik, a na drugim parkowały samochody:)
Oczywiście od razu to poprawiłem.
Colin Smale (2020-08-25 12:28:17+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM!
The node for Crownhill should not be a "member" of the MK relation. Its relationship to the Borough (boundary) is implicit by its location. Can you please remove it again? Thanks!
Túllio (2020-10-10 09:40:51+00:00): They are not buildings, they are trees!
Nakaner (2020-08-27 14:18:01+00:00): Hi,

please do not add way members (roles "outer", "inner" or "") to the relation of the European Union because it is a relation of type=treaty, not a boundary relation.

Best regards

Michael
Seraq (2020-08-27 15:20:05+00:00): Hi,
I'm agree with you, it was a mistake. I take note for the next editions. 
Thank you very much,
Seraq
Túllio (2020-10-10 09:43:32+00:00): They are not buildings, they are trees! Daisyfields75
jmapb (2021-01-01 19:40:51+00:00): Happy 2021 Solongago -- I'm doing some work around Sundown and was looking at this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20224768

You added "Red Bush" as an alt_name tag and I'm wondering -- is this just a conversion of the name_1 tag from the TIGER import, or do you have additional info that this name is in use for this road?

Personally I've found no trace of Red Bush Road on any signs or in any records, and I'd be inclined to use Sundown Road as the alt_name because it's used as the address of some of the parcels around here: https://ulstercountyny.gov/maps/parcel-viewer/?mapX=-8286411.733054578&mapY=5144183.926214974&zoom=17&basemap=UCParcels

Let me know what you think, thanks, J
Zol87 (2020-09-06 05:39:03+00:00): Please be careful when drawing not to accidentally stretch streets out of alignment. I have just fixed this.
PT-53 (2020-09-02 06:25:32+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
Du hast u.a. an diesem Wegabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144271922/history
das Merkmal
construction=yes
ergänzt. Im OSM-Inspector werden dort jetzt Hinweise "nonop_confusion_on_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.97688&lat=47.71057&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual_char,nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways

Für eine längerfristige Sperrung wegen einer Baustelle ist die Merkmal-Kombination
highway=construction + construction=footway
vorgesehen.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
BeKri (2020-09-02 12:52:43+00:00): Servus Fragende Grüße,
sag doch bitte dem Herrn OSM-Inspector dass es aus meiner Sicht was falsch macht.
Ich mag diese construction-Konstrukt nicht und werde es nicht benutzen.
Ich trage Construction und Access no ein und damit sollte man klar kommen.
Hauptsache es läuft keiner 75 m senkrecht runter.
Sorry, wenn es Dir wichtig ist darf ich Dich bitten ;-))
Antwortende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-02 13:06:56+00:00): Hallo Antwortende Grüße,
ja mir war es wichtig und habe es daher gem. Wiki abgeändert.
Grüße
BeKri (2020-09-02 14:36:40+00:00): Prima Danke.
Bei Wiedereröffnung nimmst Du das dann auch wieder fehler-/ und verwechslungsfrei raus ?
Gruss
PT-53 (2020-09-02 14:44:32+00:00): Ach, das überlasse ich gerne Dir.
Grüße
BeKri (2020-09-02 15:24:59+00:00): Is aber eigentlich Deine Ecke  ;-))
Du willst doch bei der Wiedereröffnung Sommer 2021 sicher als
Erster drüberradeln oder ??? ;-)))
PT-53 (2020-09-02 15:26:19+00:00): Nö, das ist mir etwas zu weit weg. Aber Du vielleicht?
BeKri (2020-09-02 15:57:55+00:00): Naja ich war ja erst ...
Und so oft kommt man nicht in des Eck
Wir werden sehen
pza (2020-09-09 11:59:12+00:00): Are you sure the cycleway you added on the outbound side of Bridge Rd between Wattle St & Taylor street actually exists?  This stretch is on the plans, but there was no evidence of anything being built when I jogged by yesterday.
pza (2020-09-10 02:00:52+00:00): This changeset has been partially reverted by 90670135.
bob3bob3 (2021-02-26 04:17:41+00:00): Hi, have just changed your https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=301933917#map=21/-32.93259/137.39255 back to unpaved. I did not check the entire changeset. Thought I had better explain why as your change was relatively recent.

I drove past the end of Niangala Rd (on Nowendoc Rd) today and idly noted it appeared to still be "dirt". My later checks though found it was marked paved. The DCS imagery is May 2014 and the one we cant use is May 2017. My latest Mapillary imagery of the road is May 2019. I dont know how to get Bing imagery date, but it looks like a fine gravel with worn tyre tracks rather than an asphalt seal.

Feel free to use the (mostly my regional) Mapillary imagery and message me if you need more accurate date etc information.

I am not planning to drive Niangala Rd in the next few months so I cant verify for sure. Feel free then to reverse my change as you see fit.

Cheers
AdriannaaG (2020-08-25 01:40:32+00:00): disregard review request -Adriannaa
btwhite92 (2020-09-06 01:31:06+00:00): Hello,
Is this closure to motor vehicles a permanent change? Any information a quick google search turns up for me suggests that it is temporary, at least until the end of the lockdown order. Generally, what should be in OSM is the 'normal' state of things and not temporary closures (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice, see "Don't map temporary events and temporary features").

Bradley
nevw (2020-08-25 08:05:11+00:00): Hi
I deleted the obvious error in the building:levels=204 you added in this edit.
This is a public map
peetha_la (2020-08-25 04:59:03+00:00): Hi Hanif IRM-RV,

Thank you for the edits & the update

Regards,
peetha_la
Hanif IRM-RV (2020-08-25 05:51:23+00:00): Ok
pza (2020-09-09 11:57:23+00:00): Reverted broken alignment of bridge road in changeset 90644268
pza (2020-09-10 02:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been partially reverted by 90670135.
aharvey (2020-09-10 06:02:17+00:00): Hi Peter, based on https://osmcha.org/changesets/90670135 it is apparent this change wasn't made based on a ground survey. It would be very helpful if next time you could specify your source for making the change it just helps other contributors to understand how it came to be.
pantufla (2024-10-10 17:57:18+00:00): Pueden por favor verificar si La Quebrada Cotiza es la que está al este o al oeste? Está la Quebrada Anauco repetida a partir de los nodos que se habían puesto al este la creé y ahora no sé cuál es. Gracias, compañeros.
gatatat (2021-02-03 22:06:16+00:00): This is a private residence. No restaurant is located here.
mueschel (2020-08-26 18:09:19+00:00): Hi,
you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.


Please have a look to the documented tags in the wiki and use only these .
楊善茹 (2020-08-27 01:16:43+00:00): OK,thanks for your advice!
Your Village Maps (2020-08-26 03:47:43+00:00): I agree with your edits changing this highway from trunk to primary BUT I definitely disagree on your changing motorway to trunk. There are long stretches of highway that are completely access controlled - that is a motorway.
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-26 13:30:16+00:00): Generally speaking where I downgraded it, I did so because it doesn't qualify as a motorway, because of intervening or terminating at-grade intersections, or it was an iffy call and it's better to go with the lower value to avoid level creep on edge cases.

Could you be more specific?
Your Village Maps (2020-08-26 19:59:04+00:00): A few miles east of Pratt KS (just west of the 70th Avenue overpass) it becomes a motorway, which continues to the east until just west of 120th Avenue (where it should be trunk going east from there). It becomes a motorway again at the point where it becomes dual carriageway just west of the Northeast 40 Avenue interchange (you changed that bit to trunk). It then continues east as a motorway until just west of the South 263rd Street West intersection (again you mapped part of this as trunk). After many miles as trunk it becomes a motorway again just east of South 119th Street West (you made another odd edit downgrading it to trunk from there to about Seville Street, which should be reverted to motorway if it hadn't been that way originally). Thanks
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-26 21:38:24+00:00): OK, so we are talking about the Cannonball Stageline.  Motorways don't have intersections.  The section you're referring to has 2 at-grade intersections and 1 interchange at Cunningham.  I think we can agree where it goes to single carriageway on the west end is definitely a primary.

Freeways are purely all of dual carriageway, grade separated and limited access and map to motorway cleanly.

Trunk maps to the various flavors of expressway and other quasi-freeway things that are close but not quite a freeway.  The presence of the grade separated ramp doesn't automatically make it a freeway; expressways can and do contain grade separated ramps quite commonly.  The segment you're referring to ends at a single-carriageway primary on the west and the east, with several at-grade intersections and one grade-separated junction.

While it's clearly obviously that KDOT has plans to make the whole Cannonball Stageline a freeway at some point years or decades down the road, I think it's an equally aspirational stretch to call that a freeway.  proposed=motorway does make sense, though!
Your Village Maps (2020-08-26 23:41:11+00:00): I think there's some confusion in the communication between us. If you don't mind, I'd like to edit it the way that I would do it and see what you think. I think you'll find that it makes perfect sense. But we'll see. Is that okay with you?
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-26 23:57:44+00:00): Sure, let's see if we can come to a compromise on this.

My biggest concerns is that going too high tends to give more credit to a road that it effectively operates as.  We're in a big, barely connected part of the world after all.
Your Village Maps (2020-08-27 00:48:30+00:00): As I was preparing to do this, I noticed something odd which I would like to double check. Take a look at this and then start whatever editor you use and look at the various aerial photography. I would like to call either KS DOT or Pratt County to see what they say about this intersection.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/37.64657/-98.55751
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-27 02:19:30+00:00): Good catch, I believe the bing imagery to be accurate based on my last drive through the Cannonball Stageline.  I believe what we're seeing with the bridge may have been previously assumed based on the temporary diversion and gapped earthworks that may have been present shortly after the current configuration opened.
Your Village Maps (2020-08-27 03:15:09+00:00): I will take care of it. It does look, however, like some grading was done to accommodate a future overpass. Maybe they ran out of money?
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-27 03:23:39+00:00): That'd be about right for KDOT, no?  Seems 50, 54 and 400 seem to have been renovated with aspirations of bigger plans later, particularly at major interchanges.  Which is a big contributor towards me really wanting to err on the lower side of the edge cases.
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-27 03:27:00+00:00): Like, they're aware that it's not there yet, but they're futureproofing themselves a little to buy what they got a couple extra decades.
Your Village Maps (2020-08-27 22:25:54+00:00): I have finished making edits to 54/400 between Pratt and Wichita. I did quite a bit more than what I said I would do, as I always like to make improvements along the way, especially adding details of interchanges; I also deleted a few false intersections
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-27 23:01:33+00:00): Sure, what's the changeset number?
Your Village Maps (2020-08-28 02:11:44+00:00): changeset 90043845
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-28 17:58:59+00:00): I think they'll eventually finish it as a freeway but this feels a lot too mixed to not call it an expressway and just tag as trunk still.  Once everything's grade-seperated between Garden Plain and Maize Road, I'd be comfortable calling it a motorway to Northeast 40th Street, and something lower than that from that exit west to where it transitions to single carriageway.

Some other similar roads I can think of offhand would be the Milwaukie Expressway and Sunrise Expressway in Oregon, US 75 in Oklahoma north of Tulsa.
Your Village Maps (2020-08-28 19:01:23+00:00): So you didn’t think my edits made sense? They make perfect sense to me. Do you understand my reasoning? Not a big deal though. Do you live in Kansas? I’ve been through Kansas many times, mainly on I-70 and in the KC metro area.
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-28 20:19:43+00:00): You're talking about the ones just west of Wichita in 90043845, right?  I saw those, they make coherent sense, I just think motorway isn't the right level for something with intersections, and jumping back and forth for short distances takes away from clarity instead of improving it.

I live down in Tulsa but 50, 54 and 400 are my favorites for getting up to Colorado when I go to/from there ~2 times a year.  I make it up to Wichita, Sedan and Independence more regularly.
Koreller (2022-04-16 08:05:34+00:00): Bonjour Gamerdgl,

J'ai vu que tu avais rajouté un arrêt de bus, en revanche je ne comprend pas comment as-tu réussi à l'identifier ? À ton avis il s'agit bien d'un arrêt de bus ? (sachant qu'a 150 mètre en remontant il y a un arrêt de bus aussi).

Si tu détecte un pattern je serais trop bien si tu pouvais l'ajouter à mon guide de mapping de la Corée du Nord (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:North_Korea_Mapping_Guide) Bonne journée !
Gamerdgl (2022-04-16 17:09:12+00:00): J'ai une carte que j'ai faite de la Corée du Nord assez détaillé, je suis un site qui parle exclusivement des transports électriques dans le pays, et j'ai accumuler beaucoup de vidéos.
user_8466505 (2020-09-04 22:03:18+00:00): Hey there! Just wanted to let you know that amenity=fire_station should have the building=fire_station tag. Thanks!
Minh Nguyen (2020-09-05 06:49:31+00:00): Ah, I wasn’t aware of that tag, thanks!
user_8466505 (2020-09-05 09:18:59+00:00): No problem. Anytime!
DD1GJ (2020-08-25 07:41:31+00:00): Hallo Humphrey3,

nach Deiner Änderung waren Wegstücke doppelt übereinander. Zuvor war nach den Bayern und Maxar-Luftbildern eigentlich alles richtig. Ich habe daher Deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht.

Weitere Informationen zu OSM findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Humphrey3 (2020-08-26 05:37:48+00:00): Hallo Joachim,

vielen Dank für die Korrektur, das wusste ich nicht. Da ich ganz in der Nähe wohne und die Wege bereits selbst mehrmals mit dem Fahrrad abgefahren bin, habe ich sie etwas abgeändert, jedoch nur leicht. 

Aber so wie der Weg aktuell eingezeichnet ist, passt es auch noch.

Gruß
Humphrey
aceman444 (2020-11-08 19:47:47+00:00): Zdravim, access=permissive znamena, ze tam moze ktokolvek ist, kym si to majitel nerozmysli. Ak ste chceli zaznacit sukromny pozemok (a teda zakaz vstupu) je to access=private. A inak dakujeme za doplnenie tejto bariery.
Heinz_V (2020-08-25 06:02:14+00:00): I did inform you about the broken boundaries because of your errors. Do not simply continue mapping. Make corrections  first!!!!
Steube (2020-11-11 10:50:50+00:00): Du hast hier fleißig in mehreren Fällen amenity=shelter in amenity=alpine_hut umgemappt. Sieht zwar im Rendering toll aus, ist aber aus meiner Sicht nicht richtig, wenn man sich an https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=alpine%20hut?uselang=de oerientiert.

Ich schlage vor, Du überprüfst das nochmal, weil mindestens die Voraussetzungen, dass Verpflegung und Unterkunft angeboten werden und ein Hüttenwirt ständig anwesend ist, nicht vorhanden sein dürften.
FraukeLeo (2020-11-15 09:33:49+00:00): Ich nehme an, hier wurde einfach im iD-Editor "Schutzhütte" eingegeben. Leider setzt der Editor dann das falsche Tag. Für die üblichen überdachten Sitzmöglichkeiten ist amenity=shelter korrekt. amenity=alpine_hut ist eine bewirtschaftete Berghütte mit Hüttenwart und Nachtquartier fernab der Zivilisation.
FraukeLeo (2020-11-15 09:36:24+00:00): Tipp an den Kollegen: Immer im linken Fenster runterscrollen zu "Alle Eigenschaften" und dort kontrollieren, was der Editor tatsächlich in die Datenbank schreibt. Leider macht der nicht immer alles gut und richtig. Ein Klick auf "alpine_hut" bringt dich auf die Beschreibung im Wiki. Du kannst dort unten auch direkt "shelter" eintippen, du musst nicht oben über die deutsche Beschreibung gehen.