piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2022-11-16 08:47:10+00:00):      Hi micmahon,
    this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

    Kind regards
    Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 08:46:44+00:00):      Hi micmahon,
    this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

    Kind regards
    Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-16 12:35:37+00:00): note that it is recommended to use automatic submission or to submit  changes manually before travelling far abroad 

this will get better once https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/4582 is implemented

(and to use StreetComplete only for what you surveyed - and to not edit remotely)
3ngineer (2022-12-27 02:52:58+00:00): Please do not connect minor lines if you are not verifying the actual electrical connections by survey or street-view imagery. Aerial imagery is not good enough. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113501560
This way is not fully a power line. It does not cross Ladner Trunk Road, because there is a gap connected by only a guy-wire that does not carry any voltage. I've noticed with is a common error in your changesets. Minor lines less than 3-cable 25000 volts cannot be mapped without survey or street imagery.
Violaine_Do (2023-01-09 23:40:46+00:00): Iaorana et merci pour tes contributions. Pour la carto des horaires d'ouverture, il faut suivre un formalisme. Le plus simple est d'utiliser cet outil : https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?oh=Mo-Th%2006:00-15:00;%20Fr%2006:00-23:00;%20Sa%2007:00-23:00
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128965949
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:09:42+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
ovruni (2022-11-16 04:27:50+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ovruni (2022-11-16 04:29:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:survey:date
ivanbranco (2022-11-16 07:29:11+00:00): +1 to ovruni

The import guidelines should be followed. 
"Changing the bitcoin_bank tag again" is not what you are doing, you are adding POIs, in another CS with the same comment you deleted POIs, you are not "changing" the bitcoin tag.
The survey date is "fake" since this data comes from a dataset (as linked in a precious changeset from another user) and not from a survey.
The data from the dataset has no quality check (there's even a POI in the middle of the ocean as I pointed out in another changeset).
There are no descriptive tags of the places (are they shops? ATMs? Banks?)
bitcoin_bank:galoy:bitcoin_beach=yes isn't documented. Seems to follow a prefix logic but there's no other bitcoin_bank:*=* value in the database.

Imho all this data should be reverted and imported in the proper way following the guidelines.
ivanbranco (2022-11-16 08:31:44+00:00): I checked the edits:
- POIs inside a parking (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10184351554)
- restaurant (without amenity=restaurant) in the middle of a pedestrian way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10184351562)
ecc.ecc.
ovruni (2022-11-16 20:32:22+00:00): See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Uppercase_characters and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:10:39+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:10:30+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:09:32+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
Warin61 (2022-11-20 05:37:24+00:00): Hi,
There is an error in relation 14893343 (building mall). Outer ways of multiplygons cannot share segments... 
In this instance look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#One_outer_and_one_inner_ring
Warin61 (2022-11-23 05:02:15+00:00): Not interested? 

Relation deleted.
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:09:58+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:10:12+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:10:24+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:09:46+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:11:16+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
mrpulley (2024-06-14 12:06:28+00:00): Forest Road (169520121) is maxspeed 60 (not 100).
Forest Road (1113505484) is maxspeed 80 (not 100)
Forest Road (1101837393) is maxspeed 80 (not 50) (I note you corrected this to 80 in a later changeset)
Corrected at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146850774
Other ways don't have a signposted speed
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-24 01:32:04+00:00): why you removed these buildings here? https://osmcha.org/changesets/128966376/
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:10:34+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
Kovoschiz (2022-11-16 04:14:46+00:00): Please don't remove the `highway=pedestrian`. It is used for both. Or the `leisure=track` can be moved sideways.
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:14:15+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:10:03+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
wislander (2023-01-03 01:56:48+00:00): Could you elaborate more about what and why you are cleaning up here? What is your basis for deleting these routes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128966514
wislander (2023-01-15 19:02:59+00:00): It's discouraged in OSM to have changesets span such a large geographic area. It would've been best to break this changeset into 3: one for the Baker area, one for the Alpental area, and one for the Crystal Mountain area.

Also, when deleting features, it's important to explain how you know the feature doesn't exist. Just saying you're "cleaning up" doesn't really help other mappers understand what you're doing or why.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128966514
Harvey M (2023-08-14 03:26:13+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, and sorry I didn't see this sooner. Next time I will break them up 3 changesets and will elaborate on my edits.

In this particular case, there were often little 'tails' of ski tour routes that dead-ended or were not representative of any well-established ski line or uptrack. In addition, there were some overlapping/repetitive tracks.
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:10:08+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:09:16+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:08:55+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:08:59+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:08:47+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
WoodWoseWulf (2022-11-24 02:56:06+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you might have dragged this out to sea by mistake?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9417326930/history
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Frans S (2022-11-16 10:05:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 

I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to next points:
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* When buildings have protruding elements, they should be included into your mappings.
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128967501
Frank Peng (2022-11-16 04:36:08+00:00): About tree at the back of Hill Hall: A Passport camper threw toilet paper from dorm room 232 in Hill Hall onto this tree on the night of Day 3 of Passport Camp 2022. Toilet paper was not the only thing thrown on this tree, something blue was also hanging on this tree. It's unknown if those things were removed from this tree or what happened to them after Passport Camp. Also, the camper who threw toilet paper on said tree was kicked out of camp the next morning (Day 4 of camp) for breaking rules.
Frank Peng (2022-11-16 05:54:16+00:00): The camper who threw toilet paper on the tree was the roommate that I stayed with during camp. He goes by the name of Joseph "Joe" Collins. He was out of control, couldn't keep his mask over his nose all the time during the morning celebrations, bible study, worship, and other indoor spaces that required masks (does not include our dorm rooms). During my youth group's trip to camp, Joe was lying on the floor of the van and couldn't sit in his seat the whole time and sometimes sat in the van without a seatbelt on. He was seen wearing his mask under his nose and his mask only covering his mouth in indoor spaces. During bible study, Joe had a bit of trouble showing love, acceptance, and respect, which was the camp covenant for the week. Joe was never called out for not observing the camp covenant for the week because his troubles to observe that were very minimal to the point where my camp bible study leader didn't have to call him out. My bible study leader from camp, Anna Beamer, the leader of Green Circle 20 from the Green House, told Joe to keep his mask over his nose during bible study and Joe went like "My bad". He drew penises on the college, drew it on someone's passport, and drew it on my bathroom stall door. Joe claimed the penis drawing was already there when we first got there, but I started to think that it was not true because it looked like he drew it. Joe thought it was funny of what he did and how he acted during the week of camp until my youth minister had serious talks with him about his behavior and actions and then got kicked out. And yes he's still out of control today.
Frank Peng (2022-11-17 01:56:47+00:00): Statement on the deadly UVA shooting:

And to my bible study leader from Passport Camp, Anna Beamer, leader of Green Circle 20 from the Green House, I heard that you go to University of Virginia (UVA) and I am shocked by the recent shooting at UVA on Sunday night, November 13, 2022, and I hope you are shocked by this deadly tragedy. We condemn the gun violence that has shaken the UVA community and our hearts and prayers go out to the victims of this deadly shooting. My heart breaks for the 3 UVA football players that were shot and killed and I offer my condolences to the families and friends of the victims. We want to thank first responders for their swift response to this deadly tragedy.
Frank Peng (2022-11-18 03:04:34+00:00): #passportcamps2022
Frank Peng (2022-12-16 04:02:16+00:00): Passport Camp for youth will not be at Greensboro College next year. It will be at Converse University in Spartanburg, SC. https://passportcamps.org/location/converse/ #passportcamps2023
Frank Peng (2023-03-27 02:33:41+00:00): Follow-up changeset, with changeset comment actually describing what happened here at Passport camp: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131253761
TTPC_Checksum (2023-03-27 10:59:43+00:00): " I honestly never knew what I typed in this discussion would not be appropriate for OSM."   Yet the off-topic text comments continue.  Please start a blog instead and add a link to a map location.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
MxxCon (2022-11-17 21:34:03+00:00): Hello.
Please note that OpenStreetMap is not intended for entering personal information. Millions of people around the world use this map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128968300
Allison P (2022-11-16 18:06:11+00:00): Not all presets need to have all fields filled. As there is no "no horses" sign on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113526273, there should be no horse=* tag at all.
Dimacn (2022-11-16 07:35:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пара моментов. 1. Текст "дорога до свалки" не является названием дороги. А тег name мы используем только для названий. 2. Тип дороги должен быть service или track 3. Вряд ли там стоят знаки ограничения скорости 40. Всё это описано в вики. Пожалуйста почитайте, и пожалуйста исправьте.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Glassman (2022-11-17 21:27:22+00:00): Great contribution. As you get more involved with OSM you might start questioning highway classifications. The National Forest Development Roads are often just 4wd tracks tagged as highway=track or if they are maintained then highway=unclassified. Because we use British English (OSM was started in England) for our tags, unclassified doesn't mean what you'd think. It's basically a rural residential street. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. Thanks again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128970926
kurisubrooks (2022-11-16 11:26:21+00:00): iD duped some ways when trying to merge with another user's changes, working to fix.
Diacritic (2022-11-16 11:04:16+00:00): Hi Boulton_Zak.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions around Frankston. :)

I noticed in your changes that you've changed the "flares" at roundabouts (the streets leading to the roundabouts), into link roads. Unfortunately, this doesn't match best practice for tagging roads. Link roads should be reserved for slip roads, and ramps; not points where a carriageway splits into two. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Link_(highway)

Also, I noticed you've added names to some footpaths. We don't use the name field to describe an element, (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions) and in these cases, it's best to leave the name field empty.

There are loads of mappers in Australia, and we are a friendly bunch. I'd encourage you to join us on one of our social channels if you are interested. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Mapping_Community#Social_Channels

Dian.
82BFBE2SFJ (2022-11-16 06:33:35+00:00): Khan Baz khan house, Mohalla Azam khanm Havelain Abbottabad
onowicak (2022-11-16 06:30:55+00:00): Park Area
Glassman (2022-11-17 21:29:19+00:00): #TIP: OSM doesn't use descriptive name like name=Building. The tag building=* is sufficient. Can you review this edit and correct the name tags?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128972072
MxxCon (2022-11-17 21:35:54+00:00): Hello.
Would leisure=schoolyard be more appropriate tag here?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dschoolyard
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128972082
Michael Alvarez (2022-11-18 02:50:19+00:00): I would say it did if it was exclusively for school used but it’s also designated for public use after school hours via the signs by the entrances.
kurisubrooks (2022-11-16 11:49:25+00:00): Hi there, it appears you're mass editing the removal of explicit oneway=no in the Sydney area. Can I please request an explanation?
ReinerMeyer (2022-11-16 21:21:22+00:00): The oneway=no tag is a default value, therefore not necessary to use (see Wiki).
Ds5rUy (2022-11-17 03:41:21+00:00): Just because it's "not necessary" is not reason to remove it.

The tag serves as documentation that someone actually reviewed the situation and made sure the road is not oneway. Something that is very common in inner cities like here.

I'm not sure why there is an urgent need to verschlimmbessern the mapping here...
aharvey (2022-11-17 11:20:49+00:00): Spot on Ds5rUy. While it's reasonable for data consumers to assume no as a default value, sometimes mappers will map it to be explicit if they have checked. Sometimes it might be easily mistaken as oneway=yes by armchair mappers so we'd add oneway=no to avoid it being tagged without a survey.

Generally a good idea to try and split the changeset into similar changes as it makes it easier in cases like this.
aharvey (2022-11-17 12:09:14+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129039096 I've retained some of the later conflicted changes around Market Street being split into two oneways.
user_5359 (2022-11-19 11:19:54+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1113546732. This way has no OSM tags, but some of a node have a incorrectly build relation (only one member unknown tags etc). This way has no connection to other highways. Furthermore, studying the aerial photo, I suspect that the node https://www.osm.org/node/10187732954 is positioned incorrectly.
Did you need help?
Glassman (2022-11-17 21:34:04+00:00): Isn't the building called the Landing and nor Arnies?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128972180
gscholz (2022-11-16 08:50:33+00:00): Hi Godfrey Mgulwa,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding wrong way connections:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128972215

I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please edit more carefully.

Guido
chnav (2022-11-18 15:57:45+00:00): за такие массовые удаления без объяснения причины у нас полагается пожизненый бан.
tastrax (2022-11-21 11:47:35+00:00): What is the source that this business takes bitcoin and how did you survey them?
hoserab (2022-11-16 18:49:30+00:00): FYI the changes you had made here to the lanes were inaccurate, and I have since corrected it (see changeset 129005921). I'm curious where you even got data or info that said this road segment had three lanes; it has been four lanes since the bridge to the west was constructed 40 years ago.
flaviusm_telenav (2022-11-17 06:08:08+00:00): Hello , thank you for the info. The problem was the highway segment had lanes, but without lanes backward/forward wich is a mistake.
hoserab (2022-11-23 20:15:53+00:00): It was missing lanes forward/backward, but that wasn't a "mistake": it was just information to be added. The problem is you introduced *two new mistakes*: 1) you changed lanes=4 to 3, and 2) added lanes:backward=1. Neither of those pieces of data was correct.

I'm just bringing this to your attention because I don't know where you sourced that data from, and wherever it did come from, it's wrong. As I wrote in my original comment, this road has been four lanes wide for 40+ years; if you have a source that tells you it's three lanes, I would be very careful using that source's data going forward, lest further erroneous data get entered into the map.

Thanks
Glassman (2022-11-19 20:18:49+00:00): After looking at your edits I think they need fixing or reverting. For example this this edit you created a somewhat square polygon with the tag building=yes and name=Forest. There doesn't appear to be any buildings nearby and if you were intending to tag the area as natural=wood the polygon doesn't match the imagery. 

Can you please fix your edits? If you need help just let me know. If I don't hear back from you I will revert all of your changesets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128973563