piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PlaneMad (2017-05-21 15:39:46+00:00): Noticed that you tagged quite a few places in the western province as cities even though their population is under 100,000 which is accepted as the standard to be a city. Let me know if it is ok to tag them back as a town?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
jaap de vries (2016-10-18 07:02:17+00:00): Op dit moment wordt er hier flink gebouwd, weet je zeker dat wat je hier hebt ingevuld klopt? Ik heb andere bouwinformatie waar de aannemer en gemeente over een andere naam voor het gebouw spreken. Ook het aantal appartementen die er nu in staan klopt niet. Welke bron heb je hiervoor gebruikt?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
သိန်း​အောင် (2016-10-18 22:19:18+00:00): Using Non-Unicode font is not allowed here.
Constable (2016-10-15 09:49:09+00:00): Ciao, vedo che stai facendo un buon lavoro aggiungendo tante attività commerciali ma il macellaio ha colto la mia attenzione; si chiama davvero "macellaio"? il nome di solito è un nome proprio, "Macelleria Rossi", "Macellaio Russo",...
grazie
CIao
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:37:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:56:38+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
mueschel (2016-10-16 11:28:41+00:00): Please watch out for the spelling of tags!
In this region I found tags like 
addr: postcode	
addr:postalcode
addr:Postcode
addr:postcode
addr:Province

These are useless for OSM, because they are all misspelled. 
The correct keys are 
addr:postcode
addr:province
Only these can be used by automated software!

Jan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:51:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:48:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
maxerickson (2016-11-07 01:59:54+00:00): Hi-

Thanks for the addition.

Did you follow a guide or tutorial that suggested the 'category' tag?

It isn't a big problem, it just isn't widely used in OpenStreetMap so people using the data likely won't use the information.

I've added some information, the more used 'amenity=nursing_home', but if there is a guide suggesting using 'category', I'd like to try to get it improved.

Thanks,

Max
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-10-15 08:48:34+00:00): Lepiej rysować tylko obrysy, bez bawienia się w przenoszenie adresów. Integracja z adresami nastąpi automatycznie przy najbliższej aktualizacji adresacji.
geow (2016-10-15 18:06:47+00:00): Hi oracle-oracle, danke für deinen Einsatz, aller Anfang ist schwer :) Leider ist das "Il Monastero" jetzt versehentlich im Salingarten gelandet. Du solltest es in die Gillitzerstraße 1 verschieben, das ist hier
http://osm.org/go/0JCC~0uuj und die Adresse entsprechend ändern und wenn du es perfekt machen willst noch cuisine=italian;pizza anpassen. Danke, geow
marczoutendijk (2017-08-27 13:56:16+00:00): Beste Mapper,

Ik zie aan andere changesets dat je al vaker commentaar op je edits hebt gehad, en ook hier moet je ik weer corrigeren. Je hebt het (Shell) benzinestation bij Meteren op de verkeerde manier op de kaart gezet en daarbij de BAG gegevens (deels) verwijderd. 
Ik heb dat nu weer gecorrigeerd.
sperlingskauz (2018-02-16 19:57:41+00:00): Dear Adib Yz,
for your information: I have changed your tagging hight=1 in height=1 for the 3 school buildings, probably it was just a typo. 
Regards,
sperlingskauz
Adib Yz (2018-02-16 19:59:37+00:00): Ok, thank you.
dvdhoven (2016-10-15 09:59:23+00:00): Je hebt deze route met type=network aangemaakt. Het moet type=route zijn. 
Aangepast
Wippy (2016-10-15 16:49:05+00:00): Foutje, bedankt!
Constable (2016-10-15 13:46:42+00:00): seriously doubt that "syracuse bushalte" is Italian. Please replace the name:it tag with name:de
b-unicycling (2022-10-19 17:44:08+00:00): is there much point in tagging historic=no? Just leave out the historic tag.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-10-15 14:55:29+00:00): I thought your tag of flood_prone was quite appropriate for the ings
skgrange (2016-10-15 20:35:54+00:00): Hello. I agree. I made the change because the MapBox services were rendering the Ings as water. So it is a work-around. I can revert the change if desired.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-15 22:04:38+00:00): Sounds like a bug with Mapbox's rendering to me (although over the next 6 months or so it'll be likely as wrong as right!).
mueschel (2016-10-16 11:28:37+00:00): Please watch out for the spelling of tags!
In this region I found tags like 
addr: postcode	
addr:postalcode
addr:Postcode
addr:postcode
addr:Province

These are useless for OSM, because they are all misspelled. 
The correct keys are 
addr:postcode
addr:province
Only these can be used by automated software!

Jan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mueschel (2016-10-16 11:28:49+00:00): Please watch out for the spelling of tags!
In this region I found tags like 
addr: postcode	
addr:postalcode
addr:Postcode
addr:postcode
addr:Province

These are useless for OSM, because they are all misspelled. 
The correct keys are 
addr:postcode
addr:province
Only these can be used by automated software!

Jan
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:37:30+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:56:29+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
Almtesh (2016-11-02 12:04:03+00:00): J'avais une demi-heure à tuer dans ce coin, j'en ai profité pour ajouter quelques informations.
Les habitants ont cru que je préparais un mauvais coup et des chiens ont défendu leur territoire.
lmagreault (2024-10-19 11:46:35+00:00): Passé aujourd'hui. Le voisinage a pas changé !-)
Peilscheibe (2016-10-20 20:40:40+00:00): Warum wurde Niederzell zum suburb geändert? Das widerspricht der Beschilderung vor Ort.
alo8 (2016-10-21 20:53:51+00:00): ja, bin da unschlüssig.
Ober-/Mittel-/Niederzell sind (lauf Wikipedia) alles Dörfer. (Einwohner: 511/2454/238)
Mit Beschilderung meinst du grünes Weilerschild? -> place=hamlet  (allerdings schon eher groß für ein hamlet). 
Für Ober-/Mittelzell dann place=village; was meinst du?
alo8 (2016-10-27 18:43:25+00:00): Habe Niederzell auf hamlet und Ober-/Mittelzell auf village gesetzt.
Peilscheibe (2016-10-28 08:17:02+00:00): Ich habe selbst keine intimeren Kenntnisse der Reichenauer Verwaltungsstruktur. Wenn man von Mittelzell nach Niederzell fährt, sieht man eben, dass Niederzell mit Zeichen 385 StVO als Weiler beschildert ist, deswegen meine Frage.
Hm, gerade nochmal in WP nachgeschaut, dort werden alle drei als "Dorf" bzw. Streusiedlung bezeichnet, mit Einwohnerzahlen die die bei OSM übliche Abgrenzung hamlet/village überschreitet. Demnach wäre also sogar für alle drei place-nodes ein village gerechtfertigt.
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:39:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
a7meid (2016-10-15 10:01:31+00:00): اضامة طريق
user_5359 (2016-10-19 16:24:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your website doesn’t exists (any typo?).
maraf24 (2016-10-17 22:44:48+00:00): Nie jest to prawidłowa nazwa przystanku,.
dktue (2018-07-23 15:19:26+00:00): Woher kommt denn das Helipad [1]? Ich kann es im Luftbild nicht erkennen.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4449053980
Geofreund1 (2018-07-23 16:14:20+00:00): Keine Ahnung, habe ich nach 2 Jahren vergessen. Habe den Landeplatz gelöscht.
dktue (2018-07-24 08:26:37+00:00): Danke!
literan (2016-10-16 22:39:17+00:00): тесты надо удалять :-|
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 23:18:21+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=cakes
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4041432666/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=cake
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
MiroJanosik (2024-01-29 10:18:36+00:00): Hello
yes, sure it was a typo, as official wiki says that "cake" is supported value.
It should be updated, although I'm quite sure that amenity does not longer exist. It was 7 years ago + I know that Mrs. Kralikova is not in the bussines anymore (at least in another city where she had cake shop).
  Miro
Domcsi (2016-10-16 10:16:48+00:00): Kedves narancslé!
Mitől voltak ezek az utak hibásak?
Miért kellet a turistautakat is törölnöd?

Dömcsi
narancsle (2016-10-16 10:39:21+00:00): Kedves Dömcsi!

A gyalogutakat, ahol lehetőség van, a meglévő autós geometriák attribútumaként tároljuk. Itt lehetőség van gyalogos útvonalakat (akár bringásakat is) is szerkeszteni. (gondolhatod, ha minden járda és gyalogos út külön geometria lenne, milyen káosz lenne a térképen). Jobb megoldás a pedestrian attribútumokat és crossing pointokat helyesen beállítani/felvenni új geometriák felvételével szemben és ezekre beállítani pl turistaútvonalat.

A geometriák egy része, - nem tudom azokat Te szerkesztetted-e - burkolatlan autós útként volt felvéve, ráadásul hibás helyen.

Itt van egy kis leírás a gyalogos geometriákról: 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pedestrian

Ahogy néztem régóta szerkesztő vagy, bocs ha túl fogyi szinten magyaráztam a döntésem :)
Domcsi (2016-10-16 11:44:11+00:00): Ami hibás azt töröld nyugodtan de ami létezik mondjuk egy járda egy bonyolultabb kereszteződésnél,körforgalomnál nem biztos hogy felesleges.
De ha törölsz valamit figyelj oda nem e tartozik valamelyik kapcsolathoz (turistaút,kerékpárút) és ne töröld azt is.
narancsle (2016-10-17 07:48:59+00:00): Kedves Domcsi!

A törölt geometriák fenntartom, hogy fölöslegesek voltak, de azt elfogadom, hogy törlésükkel a túristúthálózatot nem kellet volna megbontanom, bár annak továbbvezetésére nem az új geometria felvétele volt a legjobb megoldás.

A kenyerem egy navigációs cég adatbázisának szerkesztésével keresem, ottani tapasztalataimat is igyekszem itt kamatoztatni, és ezek szerint szerkeszteni. Köszönöm tanácsaidat mindemellet!

Szép napot! :) Narancslé
trigpoint (2016-10-15 13:36:12+00:00): Are you absolutely certain about this?
Have you been there and checked? Did this Strava user send you a photo?

Firstly a missing unclassified road in the Midlands has alarm bells ringing, there is as much chance of finding Elvis selling fruit and veg on Leicester Market.
So did you check the available sources. Bing imagery, there is something there, maybe a track but almost certainly not a surfaced road I can drive my car down, or ride my racing bike.
OS Opendata we can use that, nothing mapped. That should have the alarm bells really ringing, finally historic OS 1:25k, mapped as a white road, not that tells a local mapper a lot. There may be a track there, but it needs a survey to determine its legal status. Did this user provide that information?
Please either downgrade this to a track, and add a note that it needs a survey, but please remove unclassified as that can be very damaging to map users.
Thanks Phil
Richard (2016-10-16 15:11:08+00:00): Geograph photos:
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/408432
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1036267
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/408921
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/408923
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4019525
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/408927
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/407050
trigpoint (2016-10-16 16:28:12+00:00): I have changed this to a track
CloCkWeRX (2016-10-16 21:07:12+00:00): Thanks, that seems a more appropriate modelling
Commodoortje (2016-10-15 17:17:44+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
► Weet je zeker dat hier een busstation is?
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
maraf24 (2016-10-16 09:53:49+00:00): To za 4 dni.
maraf24 (2016-10-16 10:02:53+00:00): Na http://uchwaly.um.wroc.pl/ nie widzę.
Podaj proszę nr lub bezpośredni link.
Coven (2016-10-16 18:52:58+00:00): http://bip.um.wroc.pl/uploads/files/Sesje_porzadki/683_16.pdf
maraf24 (2016-10-16 21:08:42+00:00): 1. To wejdzie w życie gdzieś za miesiąc.
2. Alei Architektów nie ma tam po północnej stronie Kosmonautów.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-10-15 23:12:47+00:00): Najwyższa pora nauczyć się prawidłowo tagować adresy - trochę nudne jest ciągle poprawianie po Tobie. Tutaj jest to wyjaśnione: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
user_3022894 (2018-12-01 18:05:19+00:00): Hello mueschel,
even it's about two years ago now, I actually do not know what has been wrong with the healthcare:speciality=surgery tag in version 1 of the object you edited here. The tag has been documented, in 2016 also. I just wanted to say that beacause that's why I added the tag again. I also removed the healthcare 2.0-tags which were set by me originally, because the proposal has the abandoned status now.
Greetings, Lukas
mueschel (2018-12-02 09:50:41+00:00): Hallo Lukas,
das kann ich jetzt auch nicht mehr im Detail nachvollziehen. Dort waren 3 verschiedene Tags, eines davon entsprach keinem gängigen Schema, deswegen habe ich es entfernt. Das zweite wahrscheinlich, weil ich in der Regel dafür bin, Dinge nicht nach zwei verschiedenen Schemata gleichzeitig zu taggen, sondern sich immer für eines zu entscheiden.

Jan
user_3022894 (2018-12-02 11:13:49+00:00): Hi Jan,
ah okay, jetzt verstehe ich das besser und kann es nachvollziehen! Perfekt, dann weiß ich Bescheid, vielen Dank.
Okay dann haben wir bei diesem Objekt jetzt "nur noch" das "normale" healthcare drin, alles in Ordnung.
Viele Grüße, Lukas
DaveF (2016-10-15 13:08:00+00:00): Hi Terry
Welcome to OSM
For your edit, could you clarify the origin of your data?
DaveF (2017-03-09 21:47:04+00:00): Hi Terry
I'd still like to know your source for this edit
EneaSuper (2016-10-15 19:03:56+00:00): Per il rio Lagolungo o Canevaro consiglio di usare il tag alt_name.
Ale_Zena_IT (2016-10-15 20:31:49+00:00): Modifica pure :-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 12:07:14+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447853062/history has waterway = brook that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=brook? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=brook differs from waterway=stream in this case?
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:36:58+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:56:21+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
RafalR (2016-11-01 09:46:49+00:00): Dodawany jest sklep mięsny z tagami sklepu warzywnego. Trochę tu brakuje sensu.
Athalis (2016-10-15 15:34:58+00:00): Hallo Dulciana,

erstmal vielen Dank für deine Ergänzungen westlich vom Bahnhof und nun auch hier :)

Eine kleine Anmerkung habe ich: normalerweise wird der "ref" Tag benutzt um eine Referenznummer o.ä. zu vergeben, nicht jedoch für eine Beschreibung wie "Briefkasten". Dafür bieten sich die "description" oder "note" Tags an.

Wenn du möchtest bietet sich übrigens bei Briefkästen die Erfassung der "collection_times" an ;)
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:36:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:56:11+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
EneaSuper (2016-10-17 09:09:03+00:00): Non so quando ne se pedonalizzeranno TUTTO il corso, ma bisogna ricordarsi di aggiornare :)
Commodoortje (2016-10-15 17:21:33+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
► Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert. Nodes zijn in werkelijkheid niet aanwezig, Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-02 18:40:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4449286162/history has access:foot = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?
Almtesh (2016-11-02 12:01:07+00:00): Il reste la rue entre la rue des Arts et la rue Jean MOULIN, dont l'utilisation ultérieure est encore à déterminer.
opendcc (2016-10-15 19:34:07+00:00): Hallo,

bitte bei Wegkreuzungen mit Wasserwegen entweder bridge oder culvert und den Layer mit angeben.

Danke
Almtesh (2016-11-02 11:59:01+00:00): J'ai aussi mis les numéros 3 et 5.
muralito (2016-10-19 13:25:34+00:00): The tagging "Arriva=Deutschland" isn't  a typo?
MarkusJ (2016-10-21 19:26:01+00:00): fixed.
changed "Arriva=Deutschland" to "brand=Arriva"
SomeoneElse (2016-10-24 15:10:06+00:00): You've re-added an imaginery name:fr to part of the M1 and M18 here.  I drive these roads fairly regularly and can assure you that no such name is signposted.  As previously discussed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39515595 please don't add names that don't exist in the real world just to make it appear in JOSM.
rgopen (2016-10-15 16:02:18+00:00): Добавлена остановка "8 км".
Warin61 (2018-10-10 04:07:50+00:00): Hi,

For Way: 447878335 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
Scrub is not a 'landuse', in OSM the tag to use is 'natural=scrub'.
Paul Berry (2018-10-10 12:35:41+00:00): Corrected in changeset #63379263. Thanks for spotting this!
indigomc (2016-10-16 07:18:05+00:00): Hi
Why did you remove the names from this island please. Are you sure that they are wrong. If so, do you have the correct name?
Jomal Jose (2016-10-16 11:44:19+00:00): I think that it's pavoor uliya. But I'll soon make sure. Thanks.
indigomc (2016-10-16 12:53:47+00:00): I was not referring to the form of the name written in 'English', for which there may be different forms and  which I see you have now replaced with another form. I was talking also about the removal of the Kannada name.
Jomal Jose (2016-10-16 14:50:02+00:00): Let me enquire. It's near to my location.
Jomal Jose (2016-10-17 12:22:47+00:00): My enquiry completed successfully and the conclusions are..
1.The Islet don't have any name.
But I'll be enquiring more.
2.The name Pavoor Uliya is associated to the other side of river. ie, opposite side of adyar.
indigomc (2016-10-20 18:17:00+00:00): Thank you for your efforts. You don't say what sort of enquiry it was. Since I added the name originally, I felt I had to have seen evidence, so I've looked at it again. I see the following evidence which you can look up  - 
 
On geonames it is shown as Pavuru Uliya (actually it shows long vowels with diacritics, Pāvūru Uḷiya), which you can see by adding the geonames layer on JOSM. This map also shows a location on the south side of the river as Pavuru. 

On AMS maps (which you can find at http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/india/ there is a location called Pavuru on the south side of the river, though the island is not named. 

The island's name is confirmed in an English form as Pavoor Uliya at 
https://www.google.co.in/maps/place/Pavoor+Uliya,+Karnataka+575029/@12.8632496,74.9301752,15z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x3ba358f08cecc113:0x558068836f3fae09!8m2!3d12.860645!4d74.9340293
 and at 
http://wikimapia.org/#lang=en&lat=12.857097&lon=74.938281&z=16&m=b&show=/17156751/Pavoor-Uliya
where there is also some descriptive text.

There are references to islands in the two rivers elsewhere (do a web search), where an island called Pavuru Uliya is described. 

I then looked up the word 'uliya'. At the Tulu dictionary at www.tuluworld.org, there are two meanings. One is 'a placename'. The other is 

ಹೊಳೆಯ ನೀರಿನಿಂದ ಸುತ್ತುವರಿಯಲ್ಪಟ್ಟ ಭೂಭಾಗ;ಪರ್ಯಾಯ ದ್ವೀಪ
A tract of land surrounded by river;A small river island or peninsula

Hence it is clear that the island is named Pavuru Uliya after the hamlet called Pavuru on the south side of the river. Whoever advised you that the name is associated with 'the other side of river' seems to have been referring to the hamlet. If you can find clear references elsewhere contrary to this which others can check, please state them. I have restored the previous names. 

Thank you again.
Jomal Jose (2016-10-23 12:23:19+00:00): You're correct. I thank you for resolving this. Actually I don't know kannada, but I stays near to Mangalore. I hope that we can contribute more to osm...
Parzelle13 (2017-08-30 19:32:09+00:00): Hier ebenfalls, wenn man einen neuen Eintrag ans Gebäude erstellt, sollte man den bereits als Knoten vorhandenen Eintrag des Vorgängers löschen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/576197880
Doppelte Einträge sind unnötig.
Hjart (2016-10-15 18:02:01+00:00): Removed as it's a duplicate of an existing entry: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4389594991