piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LogicalViolinist (2017-10-10 18:28:06+00:00): Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52802322

Please dont use tourism=* to define what function a normal house is. Please define it using building=*
LogicalViolinist (2017-10-10 18:27:23+00:00): Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52802322

Please dont use tourism=* to define what function a normal house is. Please define it using building=*
LogicalViolinist (2017-10-10 18:33:07+00:00): Moved tree in proper location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52802497
Miroslav Suchý (2017-10-11 07:33:52+00:00): Super. Gratuluji.
osmtools (2017-10-11 15:47:40+00:00): Hallo wegavision. In deinen letzten Changesets hast du `soutce:addr` getaggt, copy'n'paste, oder wars noch so im Feld vorbelegt? ;-)
eggie (2017-10-10 19:41:20+00:00): Je verandert hier de vorm van een gebouw.  Staat hier dan iets nieuws?
Er staat geen commentaar bij je edit.
pitscheplatsch (2017-10-10 18:33:52+00:00): Hi YueYuan, welcome to OSM. You created an apartment in the middle of a street? Furthermore, two apartments at the same location?
LogicalViolinist (2017-10-10 18:40:21+00:00): There are no tourism=appartments in this location, please stop. building=apartments is the appropriate tag for these residences and they have been added on these objects: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531507525
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531507523
eggie (2017-10-10 19:39:15+00:00): Beste Hansworst.. Nu plak je weer de landuse=residential aan andere zaken. Er was al eerder gevraagd dat niet te doen. Dat geeft problemen bij verschuivingen.
Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-10-10 19:55:56+00:00): De landuse grass zat overal geplakt aan de huizen. Ik heb het weer losgemaakt.
Er gaat een heleboel goed, maar wil je er svp op letten. landuse=grass aan grass plakken is prima. Dat moet zelfs, maar niet aan huizen en de residential. Dat is de gemeentegrens.
Vraag op het forum eens of ervaren medemappers mee willen kijken... dan krijg je advies. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Je kunt je voorstellen onder het draadje Welkom.
Commodoortje (2017-10-13 22:01:12+00:00): Hier breng je een speeltuin aan in een speeltuin.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531514720
Lees onderstaande even door als je wil.
[one feature one element] (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
Commodoortje (2017-10-13 22:02:32+00:00): Even voor de goede orde: 
OpenStreetMap is geen speeltuin.
eggie (2017-10-10 19:36:42+00:00): Even streng zijn..
Wat is nu de reden dat je een administratieve grens verlegd? Een antwoord wordt op prijs gesteld.
Hansworst (2017-10-10 19:42:59+00:00): Zal invervolg niet meer prutsen. 😐 Excuses
eggie (2017-10-10 19:44:46+00:00): Reverted wegens verleggen administratieve grens.
Hansworst (2017-10-10 19:46:04+00:00): Maar ik ga maar es slapen
eggie (2017-10-10 20:03:38+00:00): Inderdaad... wel te rusten.
Hjart (2017-10-10 18:51:17+00:00): Bemærk at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:website og https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website er synonymer
Luzandro (2017-10-16 10:27:11+00:00): Hallo, irgendetwas ist bei diesen Änderungen gröber daneben gegangen und Wege sind nicht miteinander verbunden oder liegen doppelt übereinander. Ein paar habe ich korrigiert, das hier habe ich erst einmal unverändert gelassen, vielleicht kannst du ja nachvollziehen, was da schief gelaufen ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531526038
TBKMrt (2017-10-21 07:08:16+00:00): Bei diesem changeset hat JOSM aus welchem Grund auch immer bei mehreren Wegen zwei übereinander erstellt. Ich habe schon einige korregiert, aber wie man sieht habe ich nicht alle gefunden.
Wieso das passiert ist, kann weiß ich leider auch nicht.
eggie (2017-10-10 19:27:55+00:00): Wanneer je de landuse opnieuw intekent gaat de historie verloren. Splitsen is toch de beste oplossing. Stap zo snel mogelijk over op JOSM voordat je aan iD gewend raakt.
Met iD zijn die landuse bewerkingen niet goed te doen. 
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

en ga met die editor de landuse voorzichtig te lijf.
S_Emo (2017-10-10 19:42:49+00:00): Dank voor de tip (link), want ik had JOSM al even geprobeerd, maar kreeg die (nog) niet aan de praat. Voordat ik andere wijzigingen ga doen, ga ik eerst JOSM proberen te installeren etc.
ika-chan! (2017-10-18 07:37:58+00:00): I have to agree with you on this: JayCBR was the one pushing for the renumbering of the A62, A64 and A642 as well as the downgrading of the A65, but the signs have not been updated in nearly two years since ΦΕΚ 253ΑΑΠ/2015 came into force.
BeKri (2017-10-11 15:34:01+00:00): Danke ! und sorry
literan (2017-10-11 11:59:45+00:00): там нет камеры на скорость https://mapcam.info/speedcam/point.php?idx=187203
DoDoMR (2017-10-15 09:48:10+00:00): Ist ein Tretbecken tatsächlich ein "Water Park" (Schwimmbad), oder doch eher eine Kneipp-Anlage (amenity=kneipp_water_cure)??? Wenn es sich um Kneipp-Tretbecken handelt, wäre die Bezeichnung Tretbecken (name=Tretbecken) obsolet.
Hier zum Vergleich die entsprechenden WIKI-Beschreibungen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dkneipp_water_cure
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dwater_park
Bitte um kritische Prüfung und etwaige Korrektur. Vielen Dank!
Miroslav Suchý (2017-10-11 07:37:05+00:00): Ano. To vypada dobre.
de vries (2017-10-11 07:26:30+00:00): Zou je je alsjeblieft willen houden aan de afspraak om de geschiedenis van objecten te behouden?
de vries (2017-10-11 07:26:33+00:00): Zou je je alsjeblieft willen houden aan de afspraak om de geschiedenis van objecten te behouden?
ionr (2017-10-11 08:12:50+00:00): Hallo zwockel, Häuser kann man tatsächlich auch als Punkt erfassen. Das war alles richtig. Den Umriss aus dem Luftbild abzuzeichnen ist natürlich schöner, wenn man geeignete Luftbilder hat, geht aber auch als Punkt. addr:city sollte m.W.n. so sein wie auf dem Ortschild, also vermutlich nur "Rhaunen". Kleiner Tipp: Mit JOSM geht es wesentlich schneller, da man alle Punkte gleichzeitig markieren kann und die Eigenschaften, die überall identisch sind, gleichzeitig setzen kann.
de vries (2017-10-11 10:20:29+00:00): Zou je je alsjeblieft willen houden aan de afspraak om de geschiedenis van objecten te behouden?
Martin Borsje (2017-10-11 15:39:10+00:00): Ik begrijp je echt niet; als de geometrie wijzigt kun je de oude geometrie niet bewaren, behalve dan in een eerdere changeset te kijken. Andere zaken, bijv. een cafénaam oid zijn hier niet van toepassing, Adres blijft ongewijzigd, net als BAG nummer e.d.

Graag een pm om dit verder te bespreken en op te lossen. OK?
de vries (2017-10-11 16:10:18+00:00): Ik zal je een een pb sturen. Ik denk alleen dat ik daar overmorgen pas tijd voor heb.

mvg
Copilot Bob (2017-10-10 20:46:06+00:00): Disregard Tags for HotOSMproject 3671, Puerto Rico, and Hurricane Maria
Miroslav Suchý (2017-10-11 07:48:51+00:00): Tak skoro dobře. Až na:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/673534623#map=19/50.11997/16.22370 To má být uprostřed budovy.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531547250
Tady je několik problémů. Jednak je to asi pravidelný čtverec, což ten váš obrys není. Klikněte na ten obrys pravým tlačítkem myši a vyberte čtvereček (zhranatit).
Na té budově nemá být name= To by se tak ta budova musela jmenovat. Což se nejmenuje.
Dejte dovnitř nový bod (vedle toho bodu s adresou) a vyberte preset "lékař" tj. amenity=doctors, healthcare=doctor a do name= dejte případně jméno lékaře.
Polarbear-repair (2017-10-26 10:14:56+00:00): Hallo gynmc,
schön, dass du bei OSM mithilfst!

Ein kleiner Hinweis:
Adressbestandteile wie "Salzmarkt 7" kommen nur in die Felder
addr:street 
addr:housenumber
aber nicht in das Feld "name".

Wenn es zwischen den Gebäuden einen Gang gibt, darfst du den natürlich auch einzeichnen, z.B. als highway=footway wenn dort nur Fußgänger langgehen können.
Miroslav Suchý (2017-10-11 07:53:59+00:00): Podle ortofota je ten chodník více hranatější, není tak oblý. Ideálně by bylo to projít dvakrát s GPSkou a namapovat to podle té získané GPS stopy.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-11 14:26:41+00:00): Hello ImranJuma. You have tagged this node with `building=yes`, but `building=yes` have to be a (closed) way/area. But there's already the university "Azrieli Pavilion". I think you have to delete this node, or if this is an theatre, then tag it with `amenity=theatre`
freebeer (2017-10-11 15:28:27+00:00): Hallo Harald,
I was going to post about building nodes, but when visualising this change, I see a whole buncha problems nearby and the name Carleton brings to mind a few controversial #hashtags in talk-ca.
That out of the way, I encountered such building nodes recently, and indeed I am able to create such (and maybe I did to add address info or something, where aerial imagery was too poor or tracing impossible).
So I checked the wiki, and while it appears plans are to deprecate its usage and presently avoid it when possible, I read:
   Note about using this tag on nodes : although buildings are better
   represented with their footprints (a closed way or a multipolygon
   relation), OSM is working by iteration and some areas in the world
   don't have good aerial imagery or public datasets offering building
   footprints. Therefore, buildings on nodes should be tolerated until
   better sources are available.^[1]

and at the start,
   may be used on nodes should not be used on ways may be used on areas
   should not be used on relations

I can see a lot of cleanup is needed after this misguided project; at present Azriele Pavilion spans multiple tiles for me, one of which shows it as a university, two as parts of a building, and, ugh.  A case for a sandbox if I ever saw one.
Again, talk-ca posts of the past day or so, if you have not yet read them.
I only wanted to point out your choice of wording, ``have to be'' (must be, as opposed to should be, or is best as).
Carry on, as you were.
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-22 05:20:29+00:00): Hello,
.
You forgot to update name:he
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-22 05:21:06+00:00): Please ignore the above comment. I see there was a followup changeset.
Miroslav Suchý (2017-10-11 07:59:06+00:00): Nepoužívejte adresní bod ještě na něco jiného. Render pak neví co vykreslit. Vždy amenity přidávejte jako druhý bod. Ale navíc v tomto případě ten kostel  má být na tom obrysu, protože to je jméno této budovy (narozdíl od té ordinace).
Nakaner (2017-10-15 17:17:02+00:00): Hallo THKoeln,

im Rahmen dieses Änderungssatzes hast du einige Gleise der Stadtbahn Köln von railway=light_rail auf railway=subway geändert. Das widerspricht einem im OSM-Forum vor 1 1/2 Jahren gefundenen Konsens (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53745). Ich möchte dich daher bitten, diese Änderungen sowie vergleichbare Änderungen rückgängig zu machen.

Darüber hinaus möchte ich dich bitten, in NRW anstatt der Bing-Satellitenbilder die ESRI-Luftbilder zu verwenden (sind auch im iD-Editor verfügbar). Die Bing-Bilder haben vielerorts einen signifikanten Versatz, während die ESRI-Bilder *in NRW* amtliche Bilder sind.

Viele Grüße

Michael
5m4u9 (2017-10-10 22:00:10+00:00): hm, creo que todos los acantilados (lineas de aquí... con triangulos grises) no son acantilados en sí, sino ridge o arete (creo que arete por las aristas de las crestas)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Darete

en el fondo de las quebradas se podría dibujar los arroyos de las aguas que discurren...
Caleidoscopic (2017-10-10 22:08:11+00:00): Toda la razón, cambiaré los que puse, en cuanto a los arroyos algunos no se ven y los que sí quise mapearlos pero los dejé como línea porque no encontré el equivalente a Gully en español , que era lo que les comentaba, saludos y muchas gracias.
Caleidoscopic (2017-10-10 22:13:28+00:00): a los que quedan como barrancos y no son cresta de serranía voy a mantenerlos como acantilado si no existe otra etiqueta que me recomienden, funciona?
Caleidoscopic (2017-10-10 22:17:40+00:00): Resulta que no encuentro arete si no sólo cresta, pero el tag arete explica que no es lo mismo, sabes con qué nombre está en el ID?
5m4u9 (2017-10-10 22:19:20+00:00): pero puedes utilizar añadiendo "manualmente" las etiquetas en la parte baja del formulario (lado izquierdo), sería buscar la etiqueta y su valor correcto de la wiki y añadirlo
Caleidoscopic (2017-10-10 22:40:46+00:00): comprendido!
Caleidoscopic (2017-10-10 22:49:12+00:00): cómo se añade al ID!
dvdhoven (2017-10-11 06:16:54+00:00): Ik heb het een en ander nog gewijzigd. De aansluiting van de Glacisweg was een beetje vreemd. Verder krijgt een rotonde altijd junction=roundabout.
Ik heb de rotonde ook op diverse plekken door geknipt.
Dat is gedaan omdat er een flink aantal routerelaties over heen moeten lopen.
Ik heb:
- 1 fietsknooppuntroute
- 2 wandelroutes
- 19 busroutes 
hersteld.
Ook in de aansluitende straten was het een en ander mis, of dat door jou komt of door een ander, kan ik niet zo snel zien.
Maar de Zoutestraat was door verbonden bij de Carmelweg, waardoor bussen niet konden afslaan, de Glacisweg was doorverbonden bij de de Casembrootweg waardoor bussen niet konden afslaan, de Zoutestraat was het wandelknooppunt 32 doorverbonden, waardoor de wandelroutes niet konden afslaan.

Mijn dringende verzoek is om niets meer aan de rotonde te veranderen. Als er toch iets moet veranderen, geef dan een seintje via een OSM bericht aan mij of post een bericht op het forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Door al die routerelaties is het een zeer gevoelig punt en routerelaties kun je niet met Potlach herstellen. Dat kan alleen met JOSM

Vriendeliijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2017-10-11 06:21:32+00:00): Hevel.. 'k Zat net ook al te kijken.. Dit was je edit.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52806939
 Graag reactie zodat we weten dat het over gekomen is.
Ik stuur je de changeset nog een keer per PB
eggie (2017-10-11 13:17:35+00:00): Middels PB contact gehad.
DaveF (2017-10-10 23:26:58+00:00): Could you please give more descriptive, helpful comments than "aabbcccdd"

Thanks
PT-53 (2017-10-11 07:21:04+00:00): Hallo catweazle67,
Du hast an der Kirche St. Georg in Riedlingen jetzt bereits zum 3mal unvollstänige Detailllierungen vorgenommen. Ich habe diese daher wieder gelöscht.
Koussay Maiza (2022-01-22 22:10:17+00:00): Merci de remplacer "Hôtel Soviva Resort"  par "Palmyra Aquapark Kantaoui"
Grillo (2017-10-16 22:19:14+00:00): Här gick något på tok. Du taggade om en enorm skogsyta till en byggnad. Jag har återställt redigeringen. Fråga gärna om du vill ha hjälp med något.
DakarDude (2017-10-17 12:14:10+00:00): Hej,

ja det var ju inte meningen. :/ Gjorde detta på min iPad och en usel uppkoppling (skyller på det.. ;) ). Tack.
Robert Whittaker (2017-10-13 08:10:29+00:00): I think you made a mistake editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520664349 in this changeset, as you've left it with addr:postcode=Eastbourne. Unfortunaetly, the neighbouring houses on each side have different postcodes, so you can't tell easliy which one this house should have.
RedGel (2017-10-13 13:21:43+00:00): Hi Robert, 
Thanks for picking that up. I've fixed it on changeset #52892747
Regards,
Rob.
eggie (2017-10-11 06:34:13+00:00): tip: keurige edit.. wellicht tel.nr. internationaal maken. +31
Jakson Aquino (2017-10-17 14:14:05+00:00): Erick, as ruas no entorno da Catedral foram modificadas. Não estão em construção. Já está concluído e eu já havia atualizado após passar pelo local há mais de um mês. Hoje, passei novamente e confirmei que as alterações que eu havia feito estavam válidas porque agora a sinalização horizontal já está completa. Por favor, reverta este changeset.
Jakson Aquino (2017-10-17 14:23:41+00:00): Veja: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jakson%20Aquino/traces/2523235
Jakson Aquino (2017-10-17 16:18:56+00:00): Eu tinha corrigido a área nesse changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51884963
kartonage (2017-10-12 02:46:11+00:00): Hallo,
bitte unterlasse solche Quatscheinträge. Eintrag entfernt.
Danke
bdiscoe (2017-10-11 03:52:44+00:00): velmyshanovnyi, PLEASE stop doing this. These features have way, way too many nodes - tens of thousands of colinear, inefficient, bad nodes.  Please, please learn how to use Simplify to the correct level of detail.  For these edits, I have to load them, delete most the points, and wait a long time for the deletion to upload.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-11 12:35:00+00:00): fastdraw 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/FastDraw

I mapped exactly 10 meters high
now I will be at 40-50m
+ autosimplification

ok 

???
bdiscoe (2017-10-11 16:04:44+00:00): Hi, thank you.  I'm not sure what level of detail that will produce, but, it sounds much better, and appropriate for remote regions.  In OSM we usually speak of zoom level (e.g. 15), or meters of error on simplification (e.g. 0.1-1m). Perhaps by "40-50m" you mean the number shown on the scale bar in the upper-left of JOSM window.

In case you don't know, the setting for Simplification in JOSM is: Settings, Advanced Preferences, search for "simplify-way:max-error".  For example, 0.8 is a reasonable value for hydrology, even in developed areas.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-14 22:49:44+00:00): ok
Athalis (2017-10-18 15:40:12+00:00): Hello nickvet419,

on what information are your changes of classification based (not only in this changeset, also in others)? In http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/128 we follow the classification of the Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority (PRHTA) and the procedure described on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico_Projects/Puerto_Rico_TIGER_Fixup

According to that information PR-120 should be highway=secondary, see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50335179 done by someone based in Puerto Rico.

I'm curious: Is it possible to see the history of a way in Potlatch and is it possible to supply a changeset comment?
nickvet419 (2017-10-18 16:41:30+00:00): Correct. since this road connects towns but not large towns it should be a secondary road.   change has been made.   thanks.
Athalis (2017-10-18 21:29:33+00:00): Thanks for the fast response :)
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-12 12:10:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52858239 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 52809535 because 250 cars do not fit into this car parking. Previous edits by this user show that his edits are vandalisms and therefore AGF rule does not apply any more.
kartonage (2017-10-12 02:38:11+00:00): Hallo,
dieser Änderungssatz wurde von mir revertiert, aufgrund von Vandalismus ohne Verbesserung der Daten. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52846936) Bitte unterlasse solche unnötigen Verschiebungen. Wenn es unklarheiten in der Benutzung mit iD gibt, rate ich zum Abschließen des eingebauten Tutorials.

Schönen Gruß
ChrissW-R1 (2017-10-15 10:03:10+00:00): Please have a look at the already existing data!
You added the boundary of Mevlanakapı again and again. But there is already one with right tagging: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7648808
Also please reuse the already existing nodes with the same position. This changesets looks like automatically imports.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52950943
santamariense (2018-01-07 02:47:38+00:00): Muito legal o detalhamento. Apenas umas dicas para melhorar:
* Uma vez que a área de um objeto tenha sido desenhada (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531584215), o ponto que a representava pode ser excluído (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3905354338);
* Quanto as igrejas, desenhe apenas o prédio em si e não todo o terreno para marcar como igreja.
SomeoneElse (2017-10-11 12:22:54+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I think you've accidentally included some test data in here (you can see if you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52809865 that your change stretches all the way down from Canada to mid-Atlantic, where the test data such as "Purple Street" pretend to be).
Do you know where the test data file you were using came from?  If so, we can ask whoever created it to change it so it doesn't get uploaded by mistake.
Best Regards,
Andy
BCNorwich (2017-10-11 06:33:21+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I changed building=yes to office=accountant and added the website and phone number. Hope that's OK, Regards Bernard
Supaplex (2018-01-20 00:41:24+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
-karlos- (2017-11-01 16:02:25+00:00): Warum machst du das Dach aus 4 einzelnen Linien statt einer "Fläche"?
Bei den Sitzreihen sind Linine sinnvoll, da sie Teil der Sitze darunter und darüber sind.
naoliv (2017-10-12 07:03:31+00:00): Erick, você conferiu esses objetos um por um mesmo?
Esses tipos de obejtos https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497028728 NÃO PODEM ser rotatórias.
naoliv (2017-10-12 07:07:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477055957, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49870681, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174338083...
Pode parar de ficar clicando em alguma coisa que "corrige" sozinho e passar a conferir tudo na mão.
naoliv (2017-10-12 07:11:40+00:00): Última coisa.
Alguma ferramenta de QA ignora os caminhos circulares que possuem "incorrect:junction"?
Só existe no Brasil isso https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/incorrect%3Ajunction#map
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-10-12 16:36:29+00:00): pode ser que acabei deixando algo passar, mas fiz uma a uma, vacilei em alguma hora no processo, desculpa, essa do incorrect eu tinha vist em alguma outra e aí passei a usar...
naoliv (2017-10-12 16:45:13+00:00): Certo.
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-22 05:22:42+00:00): I think you need to add name="תצפית מפל תמרים"
andi9876 (2017-11-03 02:32:06+00:00): Dear, if you add attractions please say what it is and give them a name.
3vivekb (2017-12-08 05:50:28+00:00): Be careful about not adding intersecting nodes between the Los Gatos creek trail when it passes underneath the sidewalks.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-11 06:38:02+00:00): Hi, your OVER-cleaning - in some places strongly broke the accuracy (((

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/60.8407/-164.9465
bdiscoe (2017-10-11 06:56:40+00:00): Hi, I ran simplify with a 90cm threshold. That is very conservative for a remote, wild area of mud and tundra.  As for accuracy, I ran the JOSM validator and fixed many of the issues you left, with multipolygon ways intersecting each other, overlapping ways, and many other problems.  It is fixed now.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-14 22:40:34+00:00): thnx )

"That is very conservative for a remote, wild area of mud and tundra" (c)
+100 carma )))
user_5359 (2018-05-14 20:14:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-22 05:26:44+00:00): Please do not add personal houses to the map. This is a public map. Everyone can see your edits.

If you want to save your house on your phone, You can use the Maps.ME Bookmarks feature.

I've deleted the house you added.
Warin61 (2018-11-12 04:19:51+00:00): Hi,
I have re tagged this as disused:highway=track. This should decreases its visibility on the maps.
Constable (2017-10-11 11:51:40+00:00): Hi Rico, why did you draw this building over a cycleway which was already on the map?
I'm not expecting this kind of poor mapping quality from an experienced mapper like you.
Other than that, you seem to have used DigitalGlobe Standard imagery, why did you write "Bing" as source?
Please correct your error as soon as you can. It looks to me like ESRI images should be pretty well aligned in Milano, you might want to use them to map things out in northern Italy.
Thanks for your help.
Cheers