piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stevea (2022-07-08 06:37:41+00:00): Delighted to "retag quickly."  (a.k.a. "heavy lifting is simply lifting").

I really didn't know about the fallen tree, but I agree with you that "it must be open."  I saw (in some imagery) what looked like one, but I saw no such tree (and "miles of parked tanker cars" in that vicinity in others).

Yeah, in the USA, I think rail maxspeed=* values should be explicitly mph due to history and to avoid ambiguity.  This was a case of ambiguity, I'm glad it is now resolved.

Your wigwag tag (hey, that's fun to say!) seems fine, you could do a node, too.  I'm quite flexible on such things, unless / until a wider community decides it's time to more strictly "standardize" on a scheme, like with a Proposal, or so different countries can come to agreement.  With ORM and the country-specific wiki it has spawned, this is "going OK, so far" (in my opinion).  Sometimes sloppy (USA / North America is no exception, we could use some cleanup!), but "OK."  Wigwags ARE indeed rare, they are pretty cool to watch "in action" (go to Chestnut Street when Big Trees tourist train rolls down).

I'm not really following you about a one-off trip (yours? mine? someone else's?) being decisive, so I won't worry too much.  However, I have noticed in this county (Hwy 236 and China Grade, specifically) that "construction" has been chosen as a tag for roads closed by the giant fire we suffered in late 2020, seemingly for their Carto rendering effect.  It would be good to get wider community consensus on whether that is "best practice" or what would be better to tag on roads closed for the medium-to-longer term (because of large-scale fire, for example).

OK, getting crowded (again) in this blurb; too many topics.
Minh Nguyen (2022-07-08 08:14:08+00:00): The Bing and Esri imagery showing the fallen tree is from late 2020, according to the metadata for those images. None of the other layers offer such metadata but are most likely older.
MxxCon (2022-07-01 05:01:19+00:00): Hello.
A correct way to tag tree is "natural=tree", not "natural=wood"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123055596
Syl (2022-06-30 19:47:40+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi ajoutez vous à nouveau que ces deux bâtiments sont des restaurants ? Lors d'une discussion précédente vous m'avez dis que ce sont des cantines scolaires, ce qui ne rentre pas dans la définition d'un restaurant : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=restaurant
Syl (2022-07-13 06:53:13+00:00): Bonjour, concernant le défibrillateur, vous avez ajouté qu'il est accessible publiquement, en cas d'urgence n'importe qui peut donc rentrer dans l’école pour l'utiliser sans avec avoir à demander la permission ou rendre de compte à quiconque ? Également le format des horaires n'est pas bon.
Il existe par exemple ce site pour vous aider à créer des horaires dans le bon format : https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Julbus (2022-07-13 17:47:05+00:00): Oui. Vous sonnez et vous entrez.
Syl (2022-07-13 18:34:22+00:00): Du coup je pense qu'on peut mettre accès privé pour le défibrillateur.
luisforte (2022-06-30 22:27:33+00:00): Tens forma simples de definir horários  por dois ou mais períodos distintos no ano; criei um exemplo em que o horário no primeiro semestre difere do segundo em https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Jan%2001-Jun%2030%3A%20Su-Sa%2009%3A00-22%3A00%3B%20Jul%2001-Dec%2031%3A%20Su-Sa%2009%3A00-20%3A00&mode=2&DATE=1656626340000
Espero que este exemplo te seja util.
o_andras (2022-06-30 23:38:49+00:00): Ah boa, certamente será útil, obrigado! Mas neste caso há outro problema: não sei os meses/dias exactos em que o horário troca (se é que a loja os tem definidos). Tanto quanto me disseram (uma pessoa que conheço que trabalha lá) só há horário de verão/inverno.
5m4u9 (2022-07-02 04:04:50+00:00): Hola, gracias por empezar a editar en el mapa. La idea del mapa es no repetir calles y no añadir información sensible y privada (como el nombre de la casa de alguien).

Si quieres hacer un mapa para mostrar la ruta para llegar a la casa de alguien puedes usar la página y compartir en otros lugares -> https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/
Frans S (2022-08-29 14:25:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123056707
ivanbranco (2022-06-30 20:40:57+00:00): Hi Erick,

the tag place=RumiWilco has an invalid value, place values are stuff like town, city, suburb, district ecc. could you check it out please?

Obrigado and good mapping :)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-01 04:10:13+00:00): can you send the link?
MxxCon (2022-07-01 05:13:38+00:00): Hello.
Please note that this edit is incorrect.
A parking lane should be mapped as "on_street", not "street_side".
Additionally, it should be mapped as a property of the road way, not as a separate polygon shape.
You can read more about this at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123056790
ovsassen (2022-07-01 13:53:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for letting me know!
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:02:55+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14300372 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

Best regards
jaap de vries (2022-07-01 09:11:29+00:00): Weet je zeker dat er hier een NS kaartjes automaat is. Is er hier een spoorlijn / station aanwezig of is het een OV oplaadpaal?
Wolderik (2022-07-02 20:50:26+00:00): Het klopt dat er geen station of spoorlijn is, maar toch een ns kaartautomaat als service aan de reizigers die arriveren op Eindhoven Airport. Ik ben er afgelopen week nog geweest om te kijken of die er echt staat. Zie ook opmerking: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3186469
janolezab (2022-07-01 20:27:00+00:00): Ah, so einen Key habe ich im Wiki vergeblich gesucht.
S Harkness (2022-06-30 19:00:07+00:00): This is NOT a public thoroughfare, this is private property with NO ACCESS TO LEDBURY MEWS NORTH.
Please amend this map as deliveries are going to the wrong place.
mzj36 (2022-06-30 21:00:13+00:00): Correction:
Comment is “Updated classification and tagging on portions of Airport Road. #adt”.
Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery.
AmateurPlanner (2022-06-30 19:10:39+00:00): Had some additional changes on my phone from Go Map!! that made it into this. Completed changes in Changeset 123058029 (this is why the comment mentions trees on St. Mary's but there is a Shop node edited in here)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
FrankOverman (2022-06-30 19:17:57+00:00): https://nos.nl/artikel/2434119-troost-voor-nabestaanden-220-vermiste-vliegeniers-met-nationaal-monument
Frans S (2022-07-07 10:59:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here>
You tagged an object as cementry=grave
These are historic places
Please tag them as historic=tomb
Best regards
habi (2022-08-29 08:10:36+00:00): Ciao imagoiq

Dans se changeset tu a enlevé https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302076496, qui etail la connection du 'Sentier de la Gare' avec la Rue de Lausanne.
Dans la note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3329837 c'etait noté que c'est un probleme, et j'ai "corrigé" la connection.
Mais ca a l'air d'etre plus nouveau ici que on voit sur le photos de swisstopo.

Tu peux regarded si j'ai pas fait un erreur?

Ciao de Berne,
habi
imagoiq (2022-08-29 11:42:00+00:00): Hello habi,

Je viens de vérifier pour être sûr (car comme tu dis cela bouge beaucoup par ici avec la construction du chemin pour le tramway). Il s'agissait belle et bien d'une erreur. 

Merci pour la correction !
habi (2022-08-29 13:00:50+00:00): 👌🏻
MxxCon (2022-07-01 05:21:51+00:00): Hello.
Please write more descriptive changeset messages.
"Detail Edits" on every single edit doesn't help others understand what you are changing. 👍
Please see this article for more details explanation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123058556
Filip009 (2022-07-01 10:24:13+00:00): Hello, please do not push description into name. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074910468
eggie (2022-07-05 13:08:48+00:00): Het kerkje is verdwenen van de kaart omdat de tag building=church ontbreekt.
Er is al een adresnode.. Er hoeft dus eigenlijk geen adres op het gebouw zelf.
Wanneer het gebouw geen religeuse functie meer heeft kan religion=christian verwijderd worden. 
area = yes hoort niet op een gebouw.
Ik zal wat herstellen zodat het gebouw te zien is op de kaart.
MVG
eggie
Mahdi Nameghi (2022-07-02 08:04:02+00:00): جناب چهره برقی
ضمن تشکر از زحمات شما
چرا کلمه شهید رو از اسم معبر حذف کردین؟ شما اینقدر به ما تذکر میدین چرا خودتون حذف کردین؟
ChehrehBargi (2022-07-06 16:45:05+00:00): سلام
وقت بخیر
گویا ویرایشگران برنامه‌های نشان، بلد و ... از اینکه برنامه اسم کامل و طولانی بگه مشکل داشتن، بنده هم چند روزه دارم می‌گردم (گروه ایران اواس‌ام و ویکی رو) نتیجه اینکه در تگ short name اسم کوتاه شده و در name هم اسم تابلو و در تگ old name نام قدیم و احیانا اگر نام قدیم خیابانی در تابلو قدیم هم نباشه از loc name استفاده کنیم...
این نتیجه جست و جوی بنده‌ست.
برنامه‌های جی‌پی‌اس هم برای اسامی طولانی short name رو در برنامه نویسی‌شون لحاظ کنن.
Mashin (2022-07-04 09:30:53+00:00): Here you added two railway crossings between between a railway and a road that goes over the railway tracks on a bridge. This is clearly incorrect.
empty_child (2022-07-01 09:35:12+00:00): Could you explain why you removed this building? Yes, it is under construction, but it is, and the OSM rules suggests tag "building=construction" for this purpose.
chilin (2022-07-01 14:25:12+00:00): It so happened that I know what the profile of this building will look like in the future. Now it's just a construction site and not a solid building.
empty_child (2022-07-01 14:30:22+00:00): Ah, it's logical, ok
Frans S (2022-07-19 07:39:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  You mapped in the fields a number of objects as buildings. They are not. Mostly a tree or another object. The roof of a building is mostly brown, gray or white. Green are trees or bushes.
Check also the surrounding ground. Not walked on,(light colored traces) probably not a building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123059741
5m4u9 (2022-07-02 04:07:49+00:00): Hola, gracias por corregir el nombre del parque. Casi siempre los parques (plazas) en Bolivia son toda una cuadra e incluyen canchas. En la mayoría de los casos debemos tomar en cuenta las aceras.
Frans S (2022-07-26 14:25:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You hardly squared one
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123060208
maperr (2022-06-30 20:32:51+00:00): Proszę o zweryfikowanie, bo mam wrażenie, że moją zmianą został objęty cały odcinek Kaliskiej na długości bloków 12 - 14a.   W zamiarze miałem zaznaczyć tylko punkt, w którym ustawiona jest stała blokada dla ruchu samochodowego.
Dziękuję
Note_Fixer (2022-06-30 20:34:13+00:00): site, buildings, not all demolished.
Leo Slager (2022-06-30 22:18:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
ALu68 (2022-07-01 06:29:53+00:00): Update https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074878288/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123070411
MenKauRa (2022-12-18 18:17:23+00:00): OK
I'll try to figure it out as soon as possible..
although I didn't see any errors at first glance.
Thanks
Farmacia61 (2022-07-02 08:38:37+00:00): The name of the street it´s named "Guridi"
VARVAR8 (2022-07-03 12:43:12+00:00): Please specify which street you mean. The data in OSM correspond to the cadastral data of Spain. Can you give the id of a point or way that has the wrong name?
VARVAR8 (2022-10-03 00:49:29+00:00): It wasn't my fault, but I seem to have managed to fix it.
borovac (2023-11-14 10:18:09+00:00): Hi Map-Finder

Can you please check this relations: 13299711/13299712
On this relation missing one part for this turn restriction.
I looking this turn restrictions but I do not have street level imagery with which I can fix this turn restrictions.

Thanks in advance Borovac
borovac (2023-11-14 10:20:32+00:00): Hi Map-Finder

Can you please check this relations: 13299715/13299713/13299714
On this relation missing one part for this turn restriction.
I looking this turn restrictions but I do not have street level imagery with which I can fix this turn restrictions.

Thanks in advance Borovac
user_9221753 (2023-11-15 23:25:07+00:00): When there is a double white line painted in the middle of the road, it is prohibited to cross it,
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/turning-left-on-a-double-white-line/99796
Frans S (2022-07-01 14:30:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123062010
MikeN (2022-07-06 02:05:07+00:00): Hi, the abandoned runway is probably best modeled with the lifecycle prefix so that it cannot be mistaken for a real runway.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:
Tomasz Buchholz (2025-02-04 11:13:28+00:00): Cześć 
Dlaczego zmieniłeś maxspeed ze 100 na 120 na linii https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371789863
真空中的球形猫 (2022-06-30 22:35:35+00:00): 原来琉璃小姐大清早为了画图，专程跑到西山去散步呀（笑）
user_14250389 (2022-06-30 22:40:19+00:00): 沒有實地探查過……是看國共歷史考據到的……我還沒睡……
維基數據有明確指出地點，和照片對比馬上就可以看出來。
另外多謝您的誇獎呢，琉璃醬我被稱作小姊姊一定非常優雅吧（安妮亞笑）
真空中的球形猫 (2022-06-30 22:55:05+00:00): 啊这……那还是建议北大学子早上晨跑的时候来看看，做一下on the ground survey就更好了。（https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=39.9599%2C116.2912%3B39.9692%2C116.1945）

我重庆人，考据倒是也算方便。顺便阿尼亚的笑就不用了，或许琉璃酱更像约尔太太也说不定（？）
Orozcu (2022-07-03 17:46:24+00:00): si no vive aqui, no edite, actualizese:

https://www.barranquilla.gov.co/transito/a-partir-del-martes-24-de-mayo-de-2022-se-implementan-cambios-de-sentido-vial-en-el-barrio-olaya#:~:text=La%20calle%2072%20pasar%C3%A1%20de,36%20hasta%20la%20carrera%2027.
TheJAwesome1 (2022-07-06 00:09:50+00:00): Hi Orrozcu,
I used Mapillary for the edit, which I realize is out of date now based on the government resource you provided. Thank you for sharing that, and thank you for making the appropriate update.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-01 05:59:31+00:00): triggered by https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/discussions/4178
marczoutendijk (2022-07-03 12:16:55+00:00): Hello northben,
Removing data from OSM is considered vandalism.
If trails exist (being visible "on the ground") they should be on OSM. The reason for the existence of a trail ("nondesignated") is not relevant here. 
If trails are private, forbidden or otherwise not accessible, they should be marked with appropriate tags (like access=private/no/forbidden).
Can you restore the paths yourself?

 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
northben (2022-07-03 12:43:18+00:00): Hi Marc,

These trails do not exist and are not visible on the ground. They were illegally constructed in the past as  primitive 'rake and ride' downhill mountain bike trails, but have been decommissioned and restored.
marczoutendijk (2022-07-03 13:26:29+00:00): Hi northben,
I have asked the original mapper of that trail to give their comment here.
Jón (2022-07-04 16:39:54+00:00): Because of my lack of experience with OSM, I'm unable to visualize the actual deleted trails.  I can only see the general area where the trails were.
NorthBen seems to have more intimate knowledge of the trail/track changes here so I will defer to them.  According to other sources, there are no official trails within this edited area and the Tiger Mountain region is actively being managed by DNR and EMBA and would keep those sources up to date. 
I likely added these trails from heatmaps and I've found that most apps/sites ignore tags like access=no & abandoned=yes so deleting this/these tracks is the best course of action in this case.
This region is heavily trafficked so if the trails have been actively closed, we want to make sure they stay that way.
Making me aware of the changes was the right thing to do and for now I accept the changes.  
Thank you.
marczoutendijk (2022-07-04 17:38:46+00:00): Hello northben,
I think this case can be closed for now, given the answer received from user Jón.
Given the complexity of the situation "on the ground", it would be nice if you could give any information with the aid of photography, that said trails indeed do not exist. Is there any signage that tells people no trails exist at some point?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
felipeeugenio (2022-07-02 17:17:36+00:00): Hola. El instituto tiene como direccion Castellón 37? entonces eso se agrega como tag en el amenity=school, no en un edificio único. Por otro lado, si un edificio tiene un nombre relevante entonces agregarlo, pero da la idea de que le pone nombre a todo. Borre la cancha por ser un nombre genérico, los cuales no usamos en OSM. El de Castellón da la idea de que es el nombre por dar a esa calle.

En todo caso buen trabajo. Está invitado a unirse al chat de la comunidad en Telegram en el link: https://t.me/OSMcl


Saludos
Orozcu (2022-07-03 17:43:40+00:00): usted no vive en esta ciudad, y se confía de google maps street view, los cambios de sentido son recientes, abstenerse de editar lugares donde no vive
TheJAwesome1 (2022-07-06 00:10:01+00:00): Hi Orrozcu,
I used Mapillary for the edit, which I realize is out of date now based on the government resource you provided. Thank you for sharing that, and thank you for making the appropriate update.
OttoR (2022-09-18 11:24:15+00:00): Hallo Teek,
Zou je de edits een beetje op willen schonen.

De meeste meerpalen zijn nu twee keer ingetekend. Zou je dit willen opschonen?

Voor wat betreft de steigers; is het voldoende om deze in te teken als "man_made=pier"; hier hoeft geen pad overheen getekend te worden. Wat wel weer wenselijk is, is om ze aan te laten sluiten op de weg, zodat het duidelijk is dat er een verbinding is.

Als het overigens een overduidelijk voetpad is, zou ik het intekenen als footway en niet als path (olifantepaadje) en een trap ook als zodanig intekenen. (e.g. thv Dugerdammerdijk 168 lijkt een trap te zitten).

Een slipway wordt niet ingetekend als weg, maar als punt daar waar het water geraakt wordt. Meestal met een serviceroad naar het water toe, maar hier zou een track ook volstaan.

Ik zie dat je als bron PDOK en local survey aanhoud, maar gebruik ook eens de BGT en AHN lagen in JOSM om de edits uit te lijnen (zie: https://tinyurl.com/3snt792f)

Groet,
Otto

Groet,
Otto
abdul_4ts (2022-08-17 21:13:47+00:00): Hello fellow mapper, please consider squaring buildings where possible
MxxCon (2022-07-01 04:42:10+00:00): Hello.
Is that the proper name of that basketball court or just a name you came up with?
It appears that this name is just a description of what it is, and names shouldn't be that as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123064157
Farhan Sajid (2022-07-01 05:45:38+00:00): Hello MxxCon,
The basketball court's name is "Greg Marius Court", information about the court can be found here: https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/holcombe-rucker-park
Farhan Sajid (2022-07-01 05:46:56+00:00): This is an additional link which also displays the proper name of the basketball court: https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/holcombe-rucker-park/facilities/basketball
Farhan Sajid (2022-07-01 05:49:25+00:00): As far as the "name is just a description", I've read the link that you've provided and it states: "For example, relation The Lake in New York City's way Central Park is tagged with name=The Lake and not a constructed name like "Central Park Lake". However, actual names referencing location of object are fine, as long it is actual name". In this case, wouldn't the name of "Greg Marius Court" be correct?
MxxCon (2022-07-01 05:52:54+00:00): If that is the actual name, that's fine.

But naming things like "Home Depot Parking Lot" would be wrong.
Farhan Sajid (2022-07-01 06:30:57+00:00): That is the actual name of the basketball court: "Greg Marius Court". Because that is the case, I think this is fine.
silversurfer83 (2022-07-01 21:02:26+00:00): Moin. Du hast ein Review angefordert :) 
Herzlich Willkommen und schön, dass du mitmachst.
Mein Feedback: Schön, dass du die Parkplätze so detailliert erfasst. Leider sehen sie aus wie Kraut und Rüben. Mit der Taste "Q" lassen sich Flächen schön rechtwinklig machen. Außerdem wäre es schön, wenn du weitere Details wie Kosten, Parkdauer, etc. erfassen könntest. Das Wiki oder diverse Chatgruppen helfen da gerne.
Eine Weitere Sache: Dein Changeset (die Gesamtheit deiner Änderungen in diesem Durchgang) umfasst leider eine Fläche von Köln bis Karlsruhe. Das ist ungünstig und es ist grundsätzlich besser, wenn du dich (besonders am Anfang) auf kleinere Flächen konzentrierst.
Aber bitte nicht entmutigen lassen und wenn Fragen sind (was sicher der Fall sein wird) immer raus damit und weiter frohes Mappen
-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123064759
Wilmer Osario (2022-07-02 21:24:48+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por colaborar con el mapa.

En seguida arreglaré las modificaciones que sugirió.

¿Tiene alguna otra información que pueda aportar?
Daniel E Romero (2022-07-03 03:06:30+00:00): Si, voy esta semana a actualizar los comercios relevantes de la urbanización.