piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:33:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Владимир К (2016-08-31 06:47:59+00:00): Есть мнение, что добавлять в name:en транслит абсолютно бесполезное занятие, потому что транслитерация может делаться автоматически. Добавлять нужно действительно английские устоявшиеся названия, вроде Kremlin, Moscow, и т.д.
lamax (2016-08-31 13:20:57+00:00): а зачем? на транслите вы будите спрашивать прохожих, таксистов и т.д. ещё можете написать письмо с указанием этого адреса и это всё сработает, а вот перевод ничего не даст.
Владимир К (2016-08-31 13:29:13+00:00): Может быть перевод ничего и не даст, но смысл в том, что name:lang именно для переводов на конкретный язык, а не для транслитов. транслит всегда можно получить автоматически, перевод, который устоялся в том или ином языке - нет.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:33:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:33:29+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
MMN-o (2016-08-26 07:52:52+00:00): Tack för att du har en kommentar! :)
MiroJanosik (2016-08-30 16:36:27+00:00): Pekny den, ak bol obchod zruseny tak by bolo vhodne zmazat tento bod uplne, alebo ho zmenit na disused:shop=yes
kreuzschnabel (2019-04-16 14:57:54+00:00): ford=yes an http://osm.org/way/427762692? Fließt da ein Bach längs drüber oder was?
Sa_Fe (2019-04-23 11:14:32+00:00): natürlich nicht! hatte vor 2 Jahren den Fußweg eingefügt, was der Bach da soll weiß ich nicht
kreuzschnabel (2019-04-23 11:53:14+00:00): Nimm das ford=yes weg, dann passt es :)
Sa_Fe (2019-04-23 12:48:06+00:00): hab Furt (Gewässerquerung) gelöscht. Ich hoffe es passt dann...
Diomas (2016-08-28 16:28:42+00:00): #а #давайте #еще #больше #хештегов #в #поле name! ведь это же не osm, а твитер
Petrovi4_jr (2016-08-28 17:34:10+00:00): Дружище, всего один хештег указан в названии. И тот дублирует надпись на самом граффити, которая указывает принадлежность к одному и тому же автору. Так проще искать эти граффити через глобальгый поиск. 
Всё лишь для удобства. А чем Вам собственно мешает хештег?
Diomas (2016-08-28 19:08:36+00:00): не относится к названию объекта, дублирует содержание поля artist_name
Petrovi4_jr (2016-08-28 19:53:00+00:00): Не дублирует. Ребят зовут HoodGraff. А #myhoodisgood-это их слоган, которым они подписывают свой каждый объект, специально для того, чтоб было проще найти их. 
Поэтому считаю целесообразным хештег оставить в названии. Будет проще их найти. Ведь карты рисуются в превую очередь для удобства!
Diomas (2016-08-30 06:02:15+00:00): name - для названия объекта. для дополнительной текстовой информации есть description. Слоганы, лозунги, пояснения - все туда.

Мы же не пишем name="Зимний дворец #Расстрелли #Барокко #1762". Стараемся информацию структурировать как-то
Gardster (2016-08-30 06:54:48+00:00): Указание автора в artist_name повышает шанс его нахождения. Тег в названии - нет. Поисковики просто не затачивают на теги в названиях. Кроме того, чем длиннее название, тем меньше шансов, что рендерер найдёт место чтобы его нарисовать.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:33:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse (2016-08-27 09:41:18+00:00): Have you deleted the Pirata buoy at 0,0 for a reason?  Its website http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010 still exists with weather information on it - what information do you have that it has been removed or sunk?
scai (2016-08-27 09:55:51+00:00): You did remove the tag natural=coastline from a lot of ways. Now the coastline seems to be broken.
manoharuss (2016-08-27 12:15:07+00:00): Hi scai,

Thanks for your comment, otherwise I would not have known my mistake. My intention was to fix the relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3753553) as it was incomplete and cross interesecting at a place. The members of the relation did not have roles either.  During that I accidentally deleted natural=coastline tag as you have mentioned. Again thanks for letting me know.

I have checked and it seems natural=coastline was restored by Dmgroom in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41732133. 

I will be more careful this time.

Cheers,
Manohar
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:32:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-05-13 17:13:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:13:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:13:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
alesarrett (2021-07-21 13:10:12+00:00): Ciao, l'edificio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439107651 non mi sembra esistente... Hai conoscenza diretta della presenza?
nammala (2016-08-29 04:15:34+00:00): Hi Isaac Lalrinkima,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting tertiary road and residential area which exists in the Imagery.

cheers,
krishna
literan (2016-08-26 13:27:08+00:00): и зачем тег гостиницы удалили? ((
mavl (2019-05-13 17:13:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:13:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:13:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:13:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-13 17:13:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
Alecs01 (2016-08-27 09:14:12+00:00): Ese duplica a https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2562483665
mavl (2019-05-21 16:17:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-08-26 08:53:15+00:00): Is it really necessary to duplicate tags like this?
archie (2016-08-26 09:01:04+00:00): Yes, it is. It's not duplicate tags anywhay because it's in an own namespace (seamarkings). Purpose: Name of harbor to be rendered on map.openseamap.org.
Hjart (2016-08-26 09:03:02+00:00): Why can't you simply use the name tag?
archie (2016-08-26 09:13:46+00:00): On www.openseamap.org only tags in namespace "seamarkings" are rendered concerning at least harbours. Why do you bother? It dos not interfere w anything. The information is orderly in its own namespace. Nothing to worry about. Just leave the seamark:-tags where they are if you are not involved in seamark-tagging.
Hjart (2016-08-26 09:17:15+00:00): I worry because it's taking up unnecessary space in our database as well as complicating things equally unnecessarily.
Honestly I'm feeling very tempted to remove the crap
Hjart (2016-08-26 09:33:48+00:00): The claim that you are not duplicating tags is complete nonsense. You have given the seamark:name=* tag the exact same value as the existing name=* tag. This to me is practically duplicating tags.
Hjart (2016-08-26 10:10:48+00:00): I brought this up on IRC and I'm seeing prominent members of the community agree that the Openseamap namespacing everything needs to stop.
archie (2016-08-26 10:17:49+00:00): I sent a message to Malcom Herring, who is a major representative of openseamap. I hope he will enter this discussion.
malcolmh (2016-08-30 07:42:25+00:00): "name" and "seamark:name" do not necessarily have the same value. An object may be known to mariners by a different name than that used by the local area. For example, harbour may be named after the town by the local community, but may be listed under the name of the operating yacht club in nautical references.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:17:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:17:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
lostmike (2016-08-26 11:17:09+00:00): Is this a building named "Sand Dunes"?
singingcarols (2016-08-26 11:53:57+00:00): No it's the area filled with sand dunes - a natural attraction
SomeoneElse (2016-08-26 12:34:13+00:00): It's not really a tourist attraction as such, though is it, and it probably doesn't have the name "Sand Dunes" - that's just a description of what it is?
lostmike (2016-08-26 12:54:18+00:00): In which case they should be tagged as in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Ddune
singingcarols (2016-08-26 16:38:28+00:00): I'm sorry but I'm using maps.me to do this which doesn't give a natural attraction option. The sand dunes are an attraction here and I was about to mark where the Petrified Forest was also. I'm going to name it what the city names it as - Petrified Forest. Sorry the names aren't up to par but if you've been to Borth and would like to start marking all the attractions than be my guest since I'm only updating for tourists who use map.me to travel.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-26 16:53:58+00:00): MAPS.ME is very limited - you'll have to use a better editor to add most things to OSM.  The web-based ones on the openstreetmap.org website will work fine on a PC, or you could use something like Vespucci on mobile.
lostmike (2016-08-26 17:03:43+00:00): I lived there for 8 years. Can't say I found it attractive. :) Though the dunes are cool.
That bit on the end where the dunes are is called Ynyslas
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Supaplex (2016-08-29 17:14:01+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
KrzysztZ (2022-06-13 20:01:22+00:00): dojechałem, obejrzałem, uzupełniłem:
https://openstreetmap.org/node/4367534269
i jeszcze jeden lub dwa inne fixme. Lepiej późno niż wcale ;) Pozdrowienia od pedałującego po lasach.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
zarl (2016-09-13 12:40:58+00:00): Hallo btsens, im Wiki stehen viele Hinweise, wie man Informationen korrekt in OSM einträgt, damit sie auch gut ausgewertet (Rendering von Karten, Routing, etc.) werden können. Schau doch mal hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Riding wie man einen Reitplatz richtig einträgt. 

Grundsätzlich gilt, dass "name" nicht für Funktionen benutzt wird, sondern nur für echte Eigennamen. "Reitplatz" solltest du also wieder löschen.

Hier findest du einen guten Einstiegspunkt im Wiki für neue Mapper. 

Viel Spass weiterhin!

Zarl
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
kocio (2016-09-11 03:05:20+00:00): Czy to aby na pewno jest sklep alkoholowy o nazwie Cukiernia?...
rmikke (2016-09-11 19:28:12+00:00): Przysiągłbym, że nazwę też zmieniłem... Dzięki :D
kocio (2016-09-11 21:10:11+00:00): =}
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
aceman444 (2016-09-25 15:27:06+00:00): Zdravim, ten "mini market" je naozaj supermarket, alebo len "shop=convenience" ?
eggie (2018-02-21 14:12:02+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen  ... bij deze . alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Ante de Baas (2018-02-21 14:55:18+00:00): dank je wel :)
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
iWowik (2016-09-07 16:39:42+00:00): Вы проставляете population и меняете place на точках НП (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1530907642),
забывая поправить place на границах НП (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133943283) В результате получаются неоднозначности в данных. 
http://wowik.000space.com/places/ru-irk/err.htm#err32
maxphizik (2016-09-08 02:03:26+00:00): Постараюсь сегодня исправить указанные ошибки.
literan (2016-08-26 13:46:01+00:00): зачем дублируете?
user_3471253 (2016-08-26 14:10:05+00:00):  Здравствуйте! 
 Решил точнее указать расположение входа в школу, заодно уточнил адрес сайта и время работы организации. Остальное на Ваше усмотрение.
literan (2016-08-29 05:07:07+00:00): мой вопрос был: "Зачем дублируете"? Зачем вместо добавления этих атрибутов к существующему объекту создаете новый? В любом случае, уже откатил
user_3471253 (2016-08-29 06:07:22+00:00):  День добрый ! 
 Прошу прощения за ошибочные действия. Я начинающий пользователь, некоторые вещи недопониманию. Впредь буду аккуратнее.
freeExec (2016-08-29 08:45:33+00:00): Там лес и домов нет, а они только на бумаге?
bekreyev (2016-08-31 11:05:19+00:00): Съезди, посмотри, давно стоят, там где номера домов указал - таблички на домах :)
bekreyev (2016-08-31 11:06:12+00:00): А стоят да, в лесу - его не вырубали, но пока спутникового снимка не появится - не особо понятно где убирать, а где нет.
Hjart (2016-08-26 11:12:50+00:00): Hvad er "Himmelbjergruten"?
Kurt Pedersen (2016-08-28 10:26:48+00:00): http://www.silkeborg.com/sites/default/files/asp/silkeborg/DivPDF/himmelbjergruten.pdf
eller
http://oplevgudenaa.dk/media/153580/Himmelbjergruten-.pdf
Hjart (2016-08-28 10:36:01+00:00): Ok. Bemærk at diverse ruter (cykel-, vandre-, mtb, bil etc) i OSM laves ved hjælp af såkaldte rute relationer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route. Et eksempel, som jeg kan se du allerede kender er https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4586523. Dvs de enkelte afsnit (som her) hedder højst sandsynligt ikke "Himmelbjergruten".
MichaelVL (2016-08-26 12:56:27+00:00): Hej,
Hedder stien faktisk 'Himmelbrgruten' eller er det en trykfejl?
Kurt Pedersen (2016-08-28 10:13:53+00:00): Himmelbjergruten er det rigtige. Min fejl.
user_5359 (2016-08-26 12:52:19+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte die Position überprüfen, m.E. liegt der Punkt auf der falschen Straßenseite.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
نورس الطائر (2022-08-27 01:55:52+00:00): هنالك الكثير من الاخطاء في هذا التعديل، الكثير من هذه الاخطاء متواجدة ايضا في خرائط اخرى.
هل قمت انت باضافة هذه الاخطاء ايضا للخرائط الاخرى؟ ام قمت بالنسخ من تلك الخرائط؟
mavl (2019-05-21 16:18:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-21 16:19:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
zarl (2016-08-30 09:14:39+00:00): Hi Linda, deine Versuche in Potlatch finden nicht in einer Sandbox statt, d.h. du fügst Informationen in die OSM-Datenbank ein. Bitte schau dir mal die Hinweise für Beginner an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

Sind hier irgendwelche konkreten Punkte eingetragen worden, die vor Ort irgendeine Entsprechung haben? 

Bitte trage in Zukunft beim Speichern einen Kommentar ein, was du in dem Changeset erledigt hast. 

Gruss,
Zarl
Athalis (2016-09-11 10:11:55+00:00): Wurde mittlerweile im Changeset 41904337 rückgängig gemacht.
santamariense (2016-08-26 19:02:20+00:00): This is not a level_crossing. It's connected only to boundary admin_levels.
BharataHS (2016-09-03 04:30:04+00:00): Thank you @santamariense. I corrected the error in tagging. Here is the rectified changeset. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41881325
Athalis (2016-08-29 08:10:30+00:00): Hallo Linda,

so ganz verstehe ich diesen Änderungssatz nicht, insb. ohne Beschreibung / Quellenangabe..

Auf Bing sehe ich dass die Wege im Schrebergarten verbunden sind und der Strommast steht. Die ungetaggten Kanten / Knoten machen auch wenig Sinn?..
zarl (2016-08-30 09:07:48+00:00): Das schaut nach https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=41713085 ziemlich experimentell aus.
Athalis (2016-08-31 08:39:55+00:00): Ich habe sie gerade direkt angeschrieben mit der bitte sich die Diskussion hier anzuschauen.
Wenn bis in einer Woche keine Reaktion kommt bin ich dafür den Changeset zu reverten.
zarl (2016-08-31 09:20:42+00:00): Super. Bitte auch dann den ersten Edit von ihr anschauen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41712905

Gruss,

Zarl
Athalis (2016-09-11 10:13:24+00:00): Ich habe diese Änderungen eben im Changeset 42074857 revertiert.
de vries (2016-12-13 10:51:00+00:00): Hi, I see you're doing mechanical edits to add addr:country to every adress node. Did you contact the local community about this and/or consider the local consensus about how to tag addresses?
muralito (2016-08-27 02:34:52+00:00): No ingresar datros personales.
Kolej w Polsce (2016-08-30 19:59:54+00:00): WTF!?
Kolej w Polsce (2016-08-30 19:58:59+00:00): Dienki ale masz problem z kapliczką bo w tym miejscu co zaznaczyłeś akurat jest podstacja trakcyjna
aceman444 (2019-11-30 00:56:20+00:00): Zial vsetky budovy ste posunuli uplne zle (zrejme ste si nespravne posunuli letecke snimky), takze celu tuto sadu zmien rusim.
Kolej w Polsce (2016-08-30 19:56:02+00:00): co
user_5359 (2016-08-26 13:47:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better decription please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility
MKnight (2016-08-29 19:11:54+00:00): Moin, achte doch bitte beim Gebäudezeichnen in Zukunft darauf, dass direkt nebeneinanderliegende Gebäude auch korrekt verbunden sind. 

Habe die "Probleme" soeben korrigiert.
charmides (2016-08-29 19:16:30+00:00): Hi, das war mein erster Änderungssatz – aber ich werde mir das mal ansehen, wie das geht (Pfade verknüpfen). Danke dir für die Behebung.
MKnight (2016-08-29 19:32:39+00:00): Oh, das hab ich wohl übersehen, normalerweise schreib ich nur Powermapper an ;) Aber danke für Deine Antwort.

Wegen Pfade verknüpfen: es ging um das Forsthaus (nicht um einen Pfad), die zu verbindenden Nodes kann man mit j (join) an das Nachbarhaus "kleben". 2 Nodes (bspw. gemeinsame Hausecke) mit m (merge).
Hjart (2016-08-26 13:39:16+00:00): Is this someones private home?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-08-26 15:13:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 41449985.
Erelen (2016-08-26 22:57:09+00:00): Адреса не проставляются на подъезды и шлагбаум чуть по-другому делается. К тому же, он там уже есть :)
aceman444 (2019-11-30 01:05:37+00:00): Zial vsetky sady zmien s posunom budov boli podobne nezmyselne, takze vsetky som zrusil.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
muralito (2016-08-27 02:12:49+00:00): Por el tipo de servico que es, de farmacias conviene agregar tambien telefono y horario.
pyrog (2025-06-18 18:17:57+00:00): Reformatage de l'adresse pas adapté
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-06-19 06:56:47+00:00): Bonjour,

le node date d'il y'a plusieurs années et n'a pas été mis à jour  depuis, et nous avons adapté depuis les bons formats

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
Supaplex (2016-08-26 16:12:37+00:00): 有名字嗎?
harahu (2024-05-03 21:51:51+00:00): Hey Peter,

This note refers to an object you added in this chageset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4227078

Do you know if it still exists?
muralito (2016-08-27 02:10:54+00:00): Gas es shop=lpg. 
fuel es para combustible para vehiculos.
sorcrosc (2016-08-26 21:52:01+00:00): Ciao, ricordati di assegnare sempre dei tag agli oggetti che disegni. Mi riferisco a questo:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439164094
Per le cave puoi usare landuse=quarry
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dquarry
muralito (2016-08-27 02:10:02+00:00): El "building" es para cada edificacion individual, no para todo un predio.
eggie (2018-07-09 10:22:25+00:00): Nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
muralito (2016-08-27 01:55:59+00:00): El hogar probablemente haya que mapearlo como amenity=social_facility.
Ver http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility
muralito (2016-08-27 02:08:48+00:00): Un CAPS generalmente no es "amenity=hospital" porque es solo ambulatorio, Seria o "clinic" o "doctors"