piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robert Whittaker (2016-05-12 13:53:42+00:00): Ah thanks. The PRoWs are listed at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/progress/norfolk/kings-lynn-west-norfolk/upwell-isle/ , but there are no entries for this 'parish' in the Definitive Statement file I have at http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/norfolk/kings-lynn-west-norfolk.pdf

Anyway, I've now added a prow_ref tag to that way, and tagged some of the other Upwell Isle Rights of Way that were alrady mapped.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:39:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18295890/history has access:motor_vehicle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using motor_vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well?
Juaquin (2016-04-18 08:32:35+00:00): Hi. Firefighters Task Force working here. thanks
Warin61 (2018-10-11 00:59:03+00:00): Hi,
On Way: 411212810 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
user_5359 (2016-04-18 16:30:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411208368 is really a church, please add amenity=place_of_worship (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship) and don't forget the key religion and denomination.
user_5359 (2016-04-18 16:33:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If this way is really  chapel, please add a tag amenity=palce_of_worship (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship) and don't forget the key religion and denomination
下り専門 (2016-04-18 03:59:43+00:00): こんにちは。日本の編集をレビューしている下り専門と申します。
編集時のコメントで編集内容を推測して実際の編集と合致するかを見ていますが、mag02243さんのコメントからは編集意図を読み取るのが困難です。
ぜひ、「何をどうしたか」をご記入ください。ご協力よろしくお願いします。
mavl (2016-04-18 16:39:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Вы неверно обозначили музыкальную школу, так как тегом amenity=school обозначают общеобразовательные учреждения [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity=school?uselang=ru].  
  
Музыкальную школу лучше обозначить в соответствии с [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/training]  
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4129474391/history
literan (2016-04-18 13:36:30+00:00): Обратил внимание на странные теги здесь: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411221704/history - на снимке лес, а вы ставите тег огромного здания...
andrewsem (2016-04-18 14:20:58+00:00): Поправил, спасибо за замечание!
Supaplex (2016-04-18 06:30:16+00:00): 一般要尊重先前的繪製者，而採用調整的方式處理，也能保留原先的編輯歷史
kcwu (2016-04-24 09:46:00+00:00): 不建議刪除的理由還有, 各別 node 上可能帶有一些額外(不見得有顯示出來)的 tag. 重畫的話那些 tag 就不見了.

還有就是, 你刪除重畫之後, 原本有個 hunting_stand 接到你刪除的路, 現在變成沒跟人相接, 很奇怪.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3441578746
user_5359 (2016-04-18 16:34:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: You forgot to add any information to your node!
Maanya (2016-07-19 06:07:03+00:00): Hey Giancarlo Figueroa,
Thank you very much for adding data into OSM. Your efforts are deeply appreciated! However, it would be great if you could take care of the tagging schemes for the building, looks like you have not been adding the appropriate tags. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building 
Regards,
Maanya
Juaquin (2016-04-18 08:30:47+00:00): Hola. Fuerza de tarea Bomberos Cuenca trabajando en este sector

Hi. Cuenca´s Firefighters working in this area.
Thanks
uryevich (2016-04-21 21:10:11+00:00): Зачем надо было удалять кинотеатр Центр-фильм и добавлять его с урезанной информацией? Вы могли же просто исправить то, что уже было.
Gumeg (2016-05-18 09:17:19+00:00): Не следует подписывать туалета, как "Туалет". А про второй этаж нужно указывать тегом level=2.  
Режим рбаоты туалета совпадает с режимомо работы ТЦ? Можно на сам полигон ТЦ поставить время работы и все точки внутри по базе не смогут выйти из этого диапазона времени.
Epolyanichev (2016-05-19 05:44:56+00:00): Режим торгового центра с 11 до 21, Туалет также. Но кинотеатр Центр фильм работает с 9-00 до 1-00. Вход со стороны Кинобар (отдельный) и там есть еще точка Туалет(не отмеченная)
uryevich (2016-04-21 20:56:35+00:00): Скажите, а откуда данные у Вас для этой правки? Я просто хожу тут каждый день и даже езжу, поэтому ответственно заявляю, что Ваша правка не соответствует действительности.
user_5359 (2016-04-18 16:54:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this point really a church (amenity=place_of_worship, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship) or office=lawyer (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dlawyer)?
pnorman (2017-02-26 05:56:46+00:00): You've created this dentist in the middle of the intersection. I moved it north based on the address, but could you move it to a more precise location?
aceman444 (2016-04-18 18:37:09+00:00): Dobry den, ked uz potrebujete mat amenity=university milimeter od budovy, preco ste nepresunuli na novy objekt aj ostatne udaje o skole (napr. nazov a website)? Bez toho je zmena uplne zle. A nahodou to nadvorie nepatri skole, ked uz kreslite areal skoly?
aceman444 (2016-04-25 16:50:37+00:00): Ok, podla katastra im to nadvorie nepatri. Takze tvar je dobry. Presunul som teda znacky.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
aceman444 (2016-04-18 18:39:48+00:00): Detto, zase zle. Prosim uz pochopte, ze nejde len o peknu farbu na mape, ale objekt musi mat aj zmysluplne znacky. Odtrhnutie amenity=university od udajov od nej je nezmysel. Precitajte si http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Duniversity .
aceman444 (2016-04-18 18:56:47+00:00): No neviem co ste tu ziskali zmenou VSMU na multipolygon, ale aspon ma vsetky znacky zo skoly, takze ma logicky zmysel.

Takze k comu to bolo dobre?
aceman444 (2016-04-25 16:49:34+00:00): Opravene.
aceman444 (2022-03-15 11:06:19+00:00): Uprava pozicii o meter? A ani ziadny nazov ste nezmenili. Aky je prinos tejto sady zmien?
literan (2016-04-18 13:08:09+00:00): задвоили салон. Копию удаляю
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ivanbranco (2024-01-25 19:22:04+00:00): Ciao mikima,

so che sono modifiche di 8 anni fa ma vedo che sei ancora attivo. Per caso ti ricordi cosa dovevano essere queste way? Muri?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411258622/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411258623/history

Se non ti ricordi penso si possano anche cancellare
mikima (2024-01-26 10:31:31+00:00): Muri o cancellate penso, non so perchè non le avevo taggate subito.

Nel dubbio toglierei pure, non mi sembrano informazioni fondamentali, grazie
richlv (2017-10-10 17:20:54+00:00): hi there. could you please clarify what is the data source for these additions/edits ?
GoWestTravel (2017-10-11 11:19:00+00:00): Hi Richlv,

I'm working in the travel industry and used my source for hotels for these additions. I hope I was able to contribute the correct hotels.

Thank you,

GoWestTravel
KKS (2016-04-19 12:51:48+00:00): Привіт. Я бачу ти додав назви населених пунктів польською, і в мене прохання: як вимовляється слово "Dywlin"?

Hello. I see you add pl. names to places, and I have a question: how pronounce on polish "Dywlin"? Because most of people here name it - "Divlyn", official name say - "Dyvlyn" but it maybe cost when soviet nameing being all ukranian names writes as russian and after all translate back to ukranian.
And some say "Divlin" aswell. So I try to found how it be on polish.
Zmianowy (2016-04-19 19:15:32+00:00): Witam. Miejscowość ma dwie polskie nazwy Dywlin i Diwlin. (http://dir.icm.edu.pl/Slownik_geograficzny/Tom_XV_cz.1/411)
Wybrałem Dywlin według mapy (http://www.mapywig.org/m/WIG_maps/series/100K_300dpi/P44_S46_BIALOKUROWICZE_1933_300dpi.jpg). Polakom Dywlin łatwiej wypowiedzieć.
KKS (2016-04-20 09:58:34+00:00): thanks for answer. So two names starting far away from soviet era.
And for Polissya people easier to say Divlyn :)
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ff5722 (2016-12-12 09:46:36+00:00): 你添加了这个东西，可是没有足够信息。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411266493#map=19/30.73153/104.14793
请添加名称或者类型。
Hjart (2016-04-18 09:51:20+00:00): FOT kortet er ikke nødvendigvis helt opdateret, så det er en god ide at holde øje med Geodatastyrelsens billeder
Lise Lindberg Frellesen (2016-04-18 10:47:04+00:00): Hvad tænker du på her? Er det vejnavne eller hvad?
Hjart (2016-04-18 10:52:30+00:00): Det stykke vej du her har lavet lige syd om bygning DD, er længere på luftfotos end på det der i JOSM hedder "skærmkort". Jeg har tilladt mig at forlænge den, da jeg vil gætte på at skærmkortet simpelthen ikke er opdateret her.
Lise Lindberg Frellesen (2016-04-18 10:57:54+00:00): Arh, ja. Det kan jeg godt se nu. Jeg havde kigget på ortofotoet, og troede at det rør som går over vejen var en afspæring. Men kan godt se nu at de er løftet, og dermed at vejen går rundt om hele bygningen. Tak for hjælpen.
Hjart (2016-04-19 20:12:04+00:00): Vi har  nedgraderet Slagelsevej igen (stykket fra Asnæsvej og nordpå til "tertiary") . Secondary var måske lige at stramme den lidt meget.
Lise Lindberg Frellesen (2016-04-20 06:51:37+00:00): Dette stykke af Slagelsesvej var registreret som en villavej, hvilket jeg synes var en underdrivelse. Da FOT har den registreret som en sekundær-vej, valgte jeg at følge dem. Men tertiær er også okay, bare den ikke står som villavej.
Hjart (2016-04-21 07:35:20+00:00): Har den som andre sekundærveje et nummer? For så kunne det måske være en ide at opgradere den igen (og tilføje nummeret)
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
nakoruru (2016-04-18 08:49:55+00:00): 美觀園位置不對，平板無法修正。
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
nammala (2016-04-19 07:04:29+00:00): Hi Pakenhamin,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your building edits look great and fantastic but some of the residential roads are also given a tag building=yes , there is no need of adding building tags to the highways. Please ignore them and have a happy mapping further.

cheers,
krishna
Pakenhamin (2016-04-19 13:26:38+00:00): My bad.  I set the selection criteria wrong.  I'm only interested in setting the "building = yes" tag to buildings.  I'm still learning how to avoid non buildings.
nammala (2016-04-19 14:36:36+00:00): No issues @Pakenhamin, you can just revert the changeset to make things normal. To add 'building=yes' tag only for buildings you can create an inverse filter with "building=*". you can find more information of filters at https://www.mapbox.com/blog/2012-08-15-using-filters-josm/ . If you still face problems please feel free to contact me.

There is also a building tool in JOSM which will automatically provide the tag along with the edit http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools
Pakenhamin (2016-04-20 08:40:12+00:00): Ok I need to know how to revert.  I seem to have got the hang of adding building tags now.  I'll revert and then put the proper changes in.
nammala (2016-04-20 13:30:24+00:00): Thank you
Happy Mapping
Leon K (2016-04-20 12:22:56+00:00): Please stop tagging everything as building=yes.
TheSwavu (2016-04-20 23:19:21+00:00): Seems to be an on-going problem:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38661878
Pakenhamin (2016-04-21 05:17:31+00:00): There is a very good reason for adding the building tag.  The navigator doesn't find the address because it thinks there's nothing at the address.  As a courier driver I need to find those addresses.   The building tag is how I get to find them.
SomeoneElse (2016-04-21 07:56:55+00:00): @Pakenhamin Can you explain what you mean by "The navigator"?  Many OSM-based routers exist - if there's a serious bug in one (such as not routing to things that aren't also buildings) it should be reported.
Leon K (2016-04-21 08:27:37+00:00): If your software requires tagging school ovals, parks and suburbs as buildings, then that is a fault in the software, not a justification for false mapping.
Pakenhamin (2016-04-21 09:17:38+00:00): I'm confused as to how that could be happening because I used the search criteria "Address annotion" then removed from the selection any thing that already had a building tag.  Are you saying that some of these other things have address tags in them as well?
Pakenhamin (2016-04-21 09:19:18+00:00): @Leon I'm using OSMand+ and the last time I checked if there was no building tag on the address then it would not find it.

That may have changed now and if so I'll try and work out a different way of adding the building tag to real addresses.
Pakenhamin (2016-04-21 09:20:09+00:00): Also in general I'm told it is possible to roll back changes.  Does anyone know how that can be done?
SomeoneElse (2016-04-21 10:03:40+00:00): For change rollback, have a read of http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback .  Generally I'd use JOSM's reverter plugin (but care needs to be taken to do changes in the right order).  If you'd like help with reverting a series of changes, try asking on IRC (#osm on oftc - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC ).
Leon K (2016-04-21 11:15:38+00:00): Don't worry about the rollback too much.  I've already corrected most of them manually including the Vermont and Vermont south admin boundaries.  
They should be re-rendered properly shortly.  

I'm happy to leave the address data you've added, i'm just taking off the building=yes where is not being applied to a building outline.
Leon K (2016-04-21 11:18:51+00:00): If there is an issue with osmand not finding a properly tagged address, i'd raise an issue on their tracker so they can check it out.
https://github.com/osmandapp/Osmand/issues
Hjart (2016-04-18 09:28:35+00:00): Når vi f.eks. laver søer med øer i, eller bygninger med "huller" i, bruges en såkaldt multipolygon: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon.

Jeg har lavet den sø du har lavet her om,. så du kan se det
Lise Lindberg Frellesen (2016-04-18 10:27:30+00:00): Hej Hjart,
Ja, jeg kender godt til multipolygoner, men jeg kan simpelthen ikke finde ud af hvordan man laver dem i iD-redigering. Ved du hvordan?
Hjart (2016-04-18 10:30:42+00:00): Jeg har kun meget begrænset erfaring med iD, så det ved jeg ikke umiddelbart (jeg er derimod en særdeles rutineret JOSM-bruger). Men jeg kan lige prøve at lege med det senere.
Hjart (2016-04-18 10:36:29+00:00): Jo, du laver 2 "områder" inden i hinanden, markerer dem begge og "fusionerer" dem så ( jeg er ikke så vant til sprogbruget i iD).
Hjart (2016-04-18 10:41:03+00:00): Bemærk iøvrigt at jeg har tilladt mig at rydde lidt op efter dig her (stier der krydsede veje uden at være forbundet, et stykke skov der uhensigtmæssigt var blevet til en multipolygon, etc)
Lise Lindberg Frellesen (2016-04-18 10:44:03+00:00): Arh, nu forstår jeg! Tak. :)
Ja, du er velkommen til at rydde op efter mig, hvis der er nogle geometri- eller topologi-fejl.
Sanniu (2017-06-29 07:13:12+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356473833 - is it roundabout?
Andreas Binder (2016-04-18 15:41:25+00:00): Bevor Du Dir viel Mühe machst und später andere Mapper die Tags wegen Unnötigkeit/Redunanz wieder löschen: auf einem highway=path, track usw. ist foot immer erlaubt. Das brauchst Du nicht extra dranschreiben, d.h. foot=yes ist unnötig.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Leon K (2016-04-20 12:08:31+00:00): I've removed the building=yes tag from some of these.  This tag applies to actual building outlines only, not to entire properties that have a building on them.

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
Nakaner (2016-09-13 14:43:09+00:00): Hallo friesede,

warum hast du die K 3581 in diesem Änderungssatz von highway=secondary in highway=tertiary herabgestuft? Dir ist hoffentlich bekannt, dass eine amtliche Widmung (wer für den Unterhalt zahlen muss) für OSM nur eine Anhaltspunkt ist, wie wir die Straße taggen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attributierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland#Beispiele_f.C3.BCr_die_Notwendigkeit_eines_flexiblen_Einordnens_von_Stra.C3.9Fen

Warst du vor Ort oder was war die Quelle für diese Änderung. Dein Änderungssatzkommentar ist leider sehr aussagekräftig. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:57:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Stereo (2016-04-19 06:42:55+00:00): Bonjour! Super, la rue de Chiny nous manquait depuis longtemps. Elle est encore en construction, non?
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-04-18 17:08:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you really work on the street? Please move the address to the building, i have add to the map.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
rene78 (2016-04-23 19:04:26+00:00): name:zh would be better
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
canfe (2019-03-29 14:55:16+00:00): Davvero "El Centenario" restaurant non ha un giorno di chiusura?
evgenykatyshev (2017-10-11 07:22:56+00:00): Вы отметили зарядное устройство для автомобилей около ТЦ Небо. Это не ошибка?
Commodoortje (2016-04-19 06:01:41+00:00): Dutch mapper,

Kijk even op het forum ivm mutaties in deze changeset.
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=589121#p589121
Aggregaat02 (2016-04-19 18:15:53+00:00): Wat is hier het probleem van? De namen kloppen hoe ik ze erin heb gezet.
Aggregaat02 (2016-04-19 18:18:33+00:00): O, je bedoelt die weg! Dat is dan onbewust gebeurd want ik weet daar niks van.
Commodoortje (2016-04-20 23:17:38+00:00): Changeset is in goed overleg met Dutch Mapper gerevert. 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=589444#p589444
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
AMDmi3 (2016-05-11 19:57:26+00:00): Вы ошибочно отмечаете территории детских садов и других объектов как здания - например, http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/120680081

Исправьте, пожалуйста.
Driveround3 (2017-01-23 10:28:39+00:00): Problèmes topologiques dans la digitalisation des voies résidentielles. 
- Les zone de manœuvre ne doivent pas être représentées par des routes. Il s'agit d'un attribut sur le nœud.
- Une route ne doit pas avoir de segments qui se superposent (aller-retour)
PT-53 (2016-04-18 13:01:09+00:00): Das isr eine private Garagen-Zufahrt und keine öffentliche Straße.
Straße gelöscht
SammysHP (2016-04-19 15:15:14+00:00): Warum gelöscht? access=private und fertig. Ein Weg ist ein Weg.
sander79 (2016-08-08 07:32:17+00:00): ik vraag me af waarom 'opening_hours' op de highway=service (en gate) is getagd. Moet dat niet op het sportcentrum liggen ipv de weg/gate?

Betreft weg: 13872474, 13872472, 159495800, 159495788 en node 1716068400
user_242798 (2016-08-08 10:05:11+00:00): source: survey & Mapillary.
Maar de foto's op Mapillary tonen niet wat ik heb gezien: er staan openingstijden op het hek en het lijkt (...!) dat het hek buiten de openingstijden wordt gesloten. Het is een fietspad (G11), dus voor mij een doorgaande fietsroute. Maar op het moment dat het hek gesloten is, dus niet altijd.
Een mogelijkheid om dit op de kaart te zetten (want alleen dan is het effectief) is om de opening_hours op de highway te zetten. Of access:conditional.
Opening_hours op een barrier=gate worden niet gerenderd, maar ik heb die toegevoegd als verklaring voor deze onwaarschijnlijke, maar waarschijnlijk wel juiste, tagging.
Aan de andere kant staat eenzelfde hek, dus het hele gebied lijkt buiten openingstijden op slot te zitten.
Overigens op zondag 16 april, 18:50 PM (tijdstip survey) was het hek niet gesloten.
Daarnaast moeten de openingstijden óók op het sportcentrum zelf worden gezet, maar als niet lokale fietser heb ik die openingstijden niet in de survey betrokken.
Dus: de opening_hours moeten IMO zowel op highway, barrier én sportcentrum.
sander79 (2016-08-26 15:17:27+00:00): bedankt voor je reactie. Ik ben net wezen kijken en er staan op het hek geen openingstijden. Ik heb ook al ervaren dat het hek buiten die tijden ook al open was.
Ik heb daarom de openingstijden van de wegen en het hek verwijderd. Die op het sportcenturm heb ik laten staan.
LLlypuk82 (2016-04-19 08:44:37+00:00): Банкомата там больше нет?
GosuUndeadGhost (2016-04-19 08:46:17+00:00): Владелец здания сказал, что нет там банкомата у них.
Nakaner (2016-04-18 14:03:01+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz verwendete auch Maps4BW zur Offset-Kontrolle der Bing-Bilder und zur Lagekorrektur bestehender Gebäude.
apm-wa (2016-05-12 16:24:04+00:00): Этого здания нет.
Alexander-II (2017-06-08 01:21:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Что означает название 24 OPEN? Это именно название или это график работы?
neo-plan (2017-06-08 11:00:02+00:00): Это график работы. В моём редакторе, которым я пользуюсь, нет таких тегов - поэтому приходится ставить их в название, чтобы потом, кто пользуется другими, исправили.
Alexander-II (2017-06-08 11:53:20+00:00): Тогда уж лучше вовсе не писать. Никто кроме вас же не догадается/не поймет, что это надо исправить таким образом.
Но. Вы же про Potlatch 2 говорите? Там при редактировании POI есть вкладка advanced. В ней можно вписать любой тег. Вписываете руками opening_hours и проставляете время работы.
neo-plan (2017-06-08 12:41:54+00:00): Тогда действительно лучше не буду их писать. Потому что править вручную готовые теги очень долго, кроме того я их по памяти не помню - это ещё надо лезть где-то их искать...
Alexander-II (2017-06-08 12:56:13+00:00): Спасибо за понимание!
user_870861 (2016-08-08 20:23:58+00:00): hi,
there is some way and nodes with the tag boundary=work_area.
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=working_area

is still usefull ?
aceman444 (2016-04-18 18:45:20+00:00): Zdravim, ma ta pumpa naozaj v nazve "LPG" ?
Nechceli ste zadat fuel:lpg=yes ?
AlaskaDave (2017-11-29 23:48:39+00:00): Hi timdine,

I am looking at some structures (a radio tower at 70.4914528, -148.6994692 for example) you placed on an "island" in the Beaufort Sea near Prudhoe Bay. However, none of the imagery I used shows any island or any structures. Can you tell me where your data for this place came from?

Dave
timdine (2018-01-02 15:08:34+00:00): I've gone through the imagery sources I would have used to make this (I believe it was bing) and it looks like they've painted over the area with the expectation that it is just water.  The location you're looking at on the map is Northstar Island.  A description of it can be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northstar_Island
AlaskaDave (2018-01-03 03:32:19+00:00): Thank you,
I checked the Wikipedia article and, assuming it has the correct coordinates, I added a name tag and some others to the invisible island. Those coords, by the way, were slightly displaced from the island but I left it located where you had it.

Also changed the name of the heliport to match the name of the island. It had been tagged Seal Island Heliport.
sdoerr (2016-04-18 17:13:18+00:00): Typing mistake? (ouvlaki)
Konstantin Fedorov (2016-04-18 17:57:02+00:00): It was taking from restaurant board, i think it is Cyprus meaning
sdoerr (2016-04-18 19:29:12+00:00): This is presumably the place: https://www.facebook.com/SOFIAS-Souvlaki-BAR-1013425772014353/. The long S has to be read as the initial letter of both of the first two words, I think.
Konstantin Fedorov (2016-04-18 20:11:55+00:00): Okay, will change it, thanks.
yuryleb (2016-05-20 16:30:45+00:00): Мне кажется, что формат адреса в версии #5 этого отношения дома был самым подходящим. Хотя можно было обойтись и "основным" адресом на самом здании и адресной точкой для второго
valber87 (2016-05-20 17:08:54+00:00): Оставил "Некрасова 39", а на точке "Радищева 23/25". Введение точки было более поздним решением, после прочтения мануала. Никак не могли заставить Номинантим правильно находить этот дом.