piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jeslop (2022-11-06 15:27:24+00:00): Hola adrian_1985

¿Cuál es la fuente para el nombre de la Senda Monte La Frente?.

Un saludo

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
flohoff (2022-11-12 15:50:56+00:00): Moin,
so als kleiner hinweis - Gebäude die abgerissen wurden bitte nicht löschen sondern über die lifecycle prefixe wie "demolished:building" oder "razed:building" umtaggen.

Das problem mit dem entfernen ist das der nächste das von irgendwelchen alten Luftbildern oder aus dem ALKIS sonst wieder einträgt.

Wenn das dann aus allem gängigen rausgealtert ist kann man das wirklich löschen.

Flo
JassKurn (2022-11-06 14:04:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for whats appears to be one of your first edits on OSM. I've made a change to your edit. There is a more specific tag for a Picture Framers, shop=frame. So I mad this small change. I also added the associated buildings.
luisforte (2022-11-05 19:31:26+00:00): Viva, 
Possivelmente não terás reparado, mas ao refazeres a via  alteraste o nome  para um nome incorrecto 
Rua Professor Urbano de Moura -> Rua Professor Hurbano de Moura
mini-me (2022-11-06 14:36:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1095147843
С каждым фиксом увеличивается количество stop_area
Bobropiton (2022-11-06 19:07:40+00:00): спс, выпилено. С определенного пакета я просек, что валидатор ругается по поводу не до конца загруженной инфы по точке.
pitfire (2022-11-06 06:12:34+00:00): Hallo  Muhmaker,

bitte schau einmal auf: Hauptartikel: DE:Simple 3D Buildings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part?uselang=de

 dass mit building:part=* 
(getaggte Flächen immer zu einer umschließenden Fläche mit dem Attribut building=* gehören, die den Umriss des gesamten Gebäudes darstellt (geschlossene Linie oder Multipolygon))
pitfire (2022-11-06 06:20:37+00:00): Sorry, ist Ok so, hatte etwas übersehen!
eggie (2022-11-05 19:40:35+00:00): Dag Wernert..

Op de bushalte komt in principe nooit operator. 

Een node met leisure=park klopt niet. HSV Geulle kan wel, maar niet als park Op het gebouw heb je het ook al getagd. Verder .. tip.. Gebuik de adresnodes om bedrijven en winkels op bij te taggen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-05 19:45:30+00:00): HSV Geulle aangepast
eggie (2022-11-05 19:46:52+00:00): operator Arriva en bus=yes verwijderd.
De operator staat op de routerelatie.
eggie (2022-11-05 19:49:07+00:00): Tip Gebruik voor de openingstijden deze tool. Dan krijg je de jhuiste format
openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 


Anders werkt het niet.
Groet
eggie
trial (2022-11-06 13:49:22+00:00): Bonjour, au vu de la vue aérienne, le pont ne semble pas abandonné (au-dessus d'une infrastructure utilisée ce serait dangereux) mais plus utilisé (disused). Sauf qu'au vu de la voirie il ne semble pas avoir été utilisé (donc highway=service n'est pas correct). Pourquoi ne pas taguer plutôt l'objet physique pont (man_made=bridge) ?
cmvs (2022-11-08 15:03:11+00:00): Bonjour. C'est un pont construit au dessus de la ligne TGV qui n'a jamais été raccordé à une route.
trial (2022-11-09 19:41:59+00:00): donc man_made=bridge est effectivement plus adapté. Fait : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101318190/history#map=19/48.70509/2.59847
Merci
eggie (2022-11-05 20:07:16+00:00): Wernert.. De openingestijden graag in de juiste format.
openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
MxxCon (2022-11-09 04:52:36+00:00): Hello.
OSM is a live map used by thousands of people and companies. It is INAPPROPRIATE test and experiment on the live map!
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing on instructions how to properly perform testing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128534013
JayMontana36 (2022-11-09 16:13:58+00:00): Got it, thanks; I primarily only tagged this changeset comment with "Testing/Experimenting" to attract some attention because this is the very first time that I have ever done anything with relations, besides accidentally breaking a few in the past (and then fixing them), and wanted to be sure that everything was alright here with this one (no issues/mistakes or better/recommended methods). As far as I can tell at this point though, I did understand the wiki (for associatedStreet relations) correctly and did everything correctly here, so I can now comfortably work on these relations in other areas where it makes sense (like you suggested to me awhile back), knowing that I won't mess up or break anything.
MxxCon (2022-11-09 16:25:37+00:00): I haven't looked at all the features you added in this relation to confirm it's completely correct, on cursory look it looks ok.
However practically speaking I'm not sure if this relation is adding any value to the data consumers. Its primary purpose is to disambiguate which street an address or a building belongs to. But if all of them already include that street name in addr:street tag, there's no ambiguity.
It would make sense if a building was sitting on a street with no name or an address' official location didn't match the street it was on.
On the other hand relation creates complications when it comes to editing features on this street. Some things can't edited or deleted or merged since they are part of a relation, etc.
There's a purpose for associatedStreet relation, but around NYC such might come up only a handful of times.
JayMontana36 (2022-11-09 17:30:11+00:00): Yeah it doesn't really add anything special or valuable that wasn't already known, though according to the wiki could help navigation/routing (though there were no such problems on this road), I am primarily planning on doing this for more complex areas with navigation/routing issues or areas that have sidewalks mapped (to associate those with the street rather than name them "Street Name Sidewalk" like before.
MxxCon (2022-11-09 17:39:09+00:00): If there are navigation problems, it's probably easier to fix those problems in other ways than with that relation, which I'm not even sure routers use.

As for associating sidewalks in this relation, I don't think that's an approved way of tagging. At least I haven't seen done it that way.
And before you start doing that, I'd suggest this be discussed with other nyc mappers so that we have a useful and consistent way of mapping, rather than free-for-all per neighborhood.
JayMontana36 (2022-11-09 18:24:10+00:00): Yeah, the navigation/routing issues typically have to do with the proximity of ways to destinations, some of which are generally fixed with appropriate tagging to correct that (such as a private access tag for a driveway that goes behind a destination), but there are more general ones where a destination is on a corner where two roads intersect for example, or more complex but similar scenarios where a road is deferred for one or more reasons so it navigates/routes around and avoids (and sometimes acts kinda silly for) those deferred roads; routers typically don't actually associate an address with a street based upon their addr:street tags (because like you said some addresses are (having their entrances) on the "wrong" street rather than the street of their address), they basically just find a way to get there to the destination based upon their configuration/engine, and the relations can/may help by pretty much more explicitly associating an address with a street and implying that this is the definitive way of getting to said destination as expected, not anything else nearby (unless also associated).

For the most part I won't bother with adding associatedStreet relations directly specifically for areas or streets that have sidewalks mapped out independently, unless I have more of a reason to do so (like for navigation/routing), so I won't just be going around and adding a bunch of those relations around unless I either have to or it makes sense for me to, since besides those occasional hiccups from time to time, everything works perfectly fine exactly as they are and have been.
mariotomo (2022-11-11 19:38:39+00:00): sugerencia: por favor usa los conjuntos de cambios para agrupar cambios del mismo tipo, y por favor describe qué estás haciendo. no es buena práctica usar exclusivamente hashtag. gracias.
Edier Cabrera (2022-11-11 21:31:18+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu comentario, pero no entiendo sobre 'los conjuntos de cambios' y exactamente ¿cómo es tengo que describir que es lo qué estoy haciendo? y ¿por qué no es buena práctica usar hashtag? Por favor, agradecería que me respondieras para no volver a cometer los mismo errores.
mariotomo (2022-11-13 18:17:33+00:00): "conjunto de cambios": es costumbre en OSM juntar cambios homogeneos y describir la acción, según https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments

los hashtag son útiles para filtrar (por un programa, en una búsqueda automática) conjuntos pertenecientes al mismo proyecto. sólo comentar con (tantos) hashtag no es buena práctica.

puesto que estás en un proyecto "teachosm", te sugiero además pedir apoyo del "teacher".
Matija Nalis (2022-11-19 18:37:26+00:00): related: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-do-youthmappers-teachosm/5501
eggie (2022-11-05 19:51:05+00:00): Je hoeft geen adressen aan te maken Die zijn er al. Daar op bijtaggen. Kijk je nog even?
De openingstijden kloppen nioet.
Gebruik deze tool en plak het resultaat in de 'value'.
openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
olo81 (2022-11-06 18:53:16+00:00): nie przyklejamy nasypów do obszarów, jak las zarośnie nasyp i będzie trzeba go przesunąć będzie trzeba odklejać. podobnie z cięciami obszarów do których jest przyklejony nasyp. To działa podobnie jak przyklejanie obszarów do dróg. Cięcie drogi  rozwala obszar.
HellMap (2022-11-06 10:51:23+00:00): Hello again,

As I mentioned before https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128474705, Bing is not aligned in Latvia. You are moving features to incorrect locations.
eggie (2022-11-05 20:05:38+00:00): Tip access=no  is voldoende
Larmax (2022-11-05 20:16:17+00:00): Hi, please stop aligning map objects to misaligned and low quality Maxar imagery, when there are better options available! (MML, HRI ortho)

Hei, lopeta karttakohteiden siirtely epätarkan Maxar-satelliittikuvan perustella, kun parempiakin ilmakuvia on olemassa! (MML, HRI ortho)
emersonveenstra (2022-11-12 19:00:19+00:00): badly formatted phone
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128534483
TimothyOnline (2022-11-12 20:47:21+00:00): Corrected per specification.  Thanks.
tux67 (2023-01-24 10:59:19+00:00): Da war jemand schneller --> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126973948
blxght (2022-11-05 20:22:52+00:00): Plac budowy przechodzący przez drogę nie sugeruje że przechodzi remont?
Cy0nyx_PL (2022-11-05 20:44:01+00:00): nie wydaje mi się, szczególnie, że jest opcja drogi w budowie
blxght (2022-11-05 20:56:35+00:00): Lecz dokładnym odwzorowaniem świata to nie jest, tak można innych zmylić, rzeczywiste obszary są preferowane jeśli możliwe. Puste miejsca są okej, jeśli wszystko łączysz bo brakuje sposobu oznaczenia dróg jako obszar to spójrz na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:area:highway
olo81 (2022-11-06 18:59:16+00:00): Teren po szybie maczki nie jest z tego co mi wiadomo przeznaczony pod nowe inwestycje, osm to nie jest mapa historyczna. Nie dodajemy obiektów które nie istnieją. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse=brownfield?uselang=pl
eggie (2022-11-06 06:13:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip.. Probeer wel het gebied van je edits wat kleiner te houden. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
emersonveenstra (2022-11-11 13:04:16+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution! Road names must not be abbreviated on OpenStreetMap, would you mind going through and expanding the street names (for example, it needs to be "Stonehedge Court", not "Stonehedge Ct"?
robself (2022-11-11 15:27:06+00:00): Yes, will do!
emersonveenstra (2022-11-11 15:58:58+00:00): Thanks!

Also one other thing i forgot to mention: addr:county is for addresses, not roads. Would you mind removing that on Stonehedge and East Stone Valley?
robself (2022-11-11 16:58:15+00:00): Removed!
fawkes2 (2022-11-17 09:56:03+00:00): ez az átnevezés legalábbis az angol elnevezéssekkel kapcsolatban biztos, hogy nem jó, legalábbis a KSH pl Észak-Magyaroroszágot, Northern-Hungary-nak hívja nem North-Hungary-nak: https://www.ksh.hu/regionalatlas_regions.

Mi ennek a változásnak, idegen nyelvű elnevezéseknek a forrása? (Az EUROSTAT táblázatában egyébként csak magyar megnevezés van idegen nyelvű nem: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/345175/629341/NUTS2021.xlsx)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128535535
fawkes2 (2022-11-17 09:57:02+00:00): izé helyesen kötőjel nélkül van vagyis: "Northern Hungary"
GBAB (2022-11-17 13:42:41+00:00): A forrás az Európai Unió Kiadóhivatala:
https://publications.europa.eu/code/hu/hu-5001000.htm
Ez az uniós intézményközi kiadványszerkesztési útmutató, amit elég alaposan szerkesztenek többek között tucatnyi magyar fordító és más szereplő közreműködésével, úgyhogy elég hiteles forrásnak tekinthető.
fawkes2 (2022-11-17 13:46:56+00:00): Oh oké, rendben.
GBAB (2022-11-17 21:24:16+00:00): Sokkal elegánsabb lett volna, ha ezt már a módosításkészlet megjegyzésébe is beleírom… No, majd legközelebb. ;-)
ivanbranco (2022-11-07 09:14:15+00:00): Ciao MattyFranz,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923393453

ricordati che su OSM usiamo per convenzione l'inglese britannico, quindi surface=terra non va bene, puoi trovare sulla wiki i valori corretti (qua presumo surface=ground ?).

Buon mapping :)
Rewinteer (2022-11-05 20:56:58+00:00): отсортированы члены отношений маршрутов 52 троллейбуса и 23 автобуса (случайно отправил коммент с предыдущего чейнджсета)
emersonveenstra (2022-11-12 18:59:55+00:00): badly formatted opening_hours and phone
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128536274
TimothyOnline (2022-11-12 20:45:49+00:00): Corrected per specifications.  Thanks.
jcr83 (2022-11-07 09:35:56+00:00): Re-bonjour,
Vous avez supprimé toutes les informations concernant les carburants de la station Intermarché. Est-ce volontaire ?
D'autre part, il y avait très récemment un compresseur pour gonfler les pneus, a-t-il été supprimé ? Car vous avez passé la valeur de yes à no.
uMatt-5 (2022-11-07 09:39:02+00:00): J'ai changé la station intermarché, je l'ai mise dans une zone plutôt que juste sur le toit de la station, dans la transition j'ai du oublié de les renseigner à nouveau, je vais corriger ça. En revanche le gonfleur est à la station Total, pas à celle d'intermarché
jcr83 (2022-11-07 09:47:22+00:00): Je vais toujours gonfler mes pneus chez Intermarché, donc ou bien il a été supprimé récemment, ou bien vous ne l'avez pas vu.
uMatt-5 (2022-11-07 09:50:21+00:00): Je viens de regarder, il y en a bien un, excusez moi ! Je ne l'avais pas vu ^^
jcr83 (2022-11-07 10:05:11+00:00): Vous êtes rapide ! 3 minutes pour aller chez Intermarché ?
uMatt-5 (2022-11-07 10:07:30+00:00): j'y étais déjà, les courses de la journée :)
emersonveenstra (2022-11-12 18:59:34+00:00): badly formatted phone number
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128536782
emersonveenstra (2022-11-12 18:59:19+00:00): badly formatted phone number
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128536821
TimothyOnline (2022-11-12 20:43:16+00:00): Corrected per specification.  Thanks.
MxxCon (2022-11-09 05:22:25+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag this as having 2 lanes when all the available satellite imagery shows only 1 lane here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128537040
S_Akash (2022-11-10 02:45:19+00:00): Hi, there are actually 2 lanes marked here now. Plus the Google satellite imagery also doesn't show the almost completed Bike lane in the middle of this roundabout.
MxxCon (2022-11-10 03:34:55+00:00): Please note that you can NOT use Google Maps to add data to OSM under any circumstances. That is considered copyright violation. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?

Looking at the available street side imagery from 8/3/2022 it still shows just a single car lane on this loop. 
DOT's plan for the roadwork of this area also doesn't show any changes to this loop https://www1.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/beach-108th-st-jan2019.pdf
Strange🤔
S_Akash (2022-11-10 04:26:04+00:00): Hi, I did not use Google maps to add data to be clear. I assumed you had used Google maps as one source when you mentioned "all the available satellite imagery shows only 1 lane here".

Also as I mentioned, there have been a few changes around this location since the latest street view as I clearly remember the newly constructed bike lane in the middle of the roundabout.

Happy for this to be changed back to one lane though.
MxxCon (2022-11-10 04:33:00+00:00): By all the available imagery I was referring to the ones in iD. If you open Background Settings panel, shortcut key "B", you can change to different satellite images taken by different companies at various times. There are also a few different maps you can switch to for reference as well.
MxxCon (2022-11-10 04:34:05+00:00): Did they expand this to 2 car lanes and still kept the bike lane?
emersonveenstra (2022-11-12 18:59:06+00:00): badly formatted phone and website
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128537156
TimothyOnline (2022-11-12 20:41:32+00:00): Corrected per specification.  Thanks.
Hugoren Martinako (2022-11-06 17:07:13+00:00): Buenas,

Antes de cambiar el nombre por defecto (etiqueta name) de una localidad has de comprobar cuál es el valor oficial que tiene, puedes comprobarlo aquí https://sede.asturias.es/bopa/2021/10/06/2021-08708.pdf

Changeset revertido, pues estaba correcto.

Un saludo
zluuzki (2022-11-06 06:58:32+00:00): pipeline? sure?
MxxCon (2022-11-09 17:59:08+00:00): Hello.
I don't think this is a correct way to tag area of this street. If you look at the resulting map, there are now 3 different ways with the same name..
Also if you take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway, there are different tags and they signify different features.

If you want to indicate street's dimensions, I think it's better to use width= tag as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width#Width_of_streets

If you use StreetComplete app, it has builtin AR mode to easily measure street widths to derive that data.
JayMontana36 (2022-11-09 18:38:35+00:00): I've removed a tag (highway=tertiary) and keeping this area unattached for now (changeset 128699681), do you know of a way to perform measurements in iD?
MxxCon (2022-11-09 18:53:04+00:00): It's a bit awkward, but if you go into Map Data side panel (shortcut U), and enable measurement panel(shortcut ctrl-shift-M), it'll show you various measurements of selected OSM object. Then you can draw a temporary line and it'll tell you its length. Simply press ESC to abort drawing that line.
blxght (2022-11-05 22:19:56+00:00): Większość budynków dodanych na terenie Koła już nie istnieją bo mamy nieaktualne dane BDOT, proszę sprawdzaj czy importy mniej więcej pokrywają się z orto lub nie przecinają się z innymi obszarami/drogami
jslawin2 (2022-11-05 22:42:37+00:00): Sprawdzę
Niiepce (2022-11-07 15:09:16+00:00): Hey,
Danke, dass du dich aktiv und die Aktualität und die Richtigkeit der Wanderwege hier kümmerst.👍
Zu dieser Änderung hätte ich eine Frage:
Wieso hast du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155622540 den highway Tag von path zu footway geändert? Ich denke path passt hier besser, da es ein Weg mit Mehrfachnutzung (Fuß und Fahrrad) ist (siehe Definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath). Die direkten Übersetzungen der Tags sind oft irreführend.
Niiepce (2022-11-07 15:10:42+00:00): Ich meinte natürlich "aktiv um die Aktualität ..."
emersonveenstra (2022-11-12 18:58:34+00:00): badly formatted phone number
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128537819
TimothyOnline (2022-11-12 20:40:14+00:00): Corrected per specification.  Thanks.
Rogoyski (2023-01-05 22:47:57+00:00): To wszystko jest z on-site visit?

Pozwalam sobie przywrócić poprzednią nazwę parku zabaw Olkówek, bo taka nienaturalna językowo nazwa z nazwą miasta na końcu, jaką zaproponowałeś, nie jest na pewno najczęściej używaną.
Andrzej3345 (2023-01-06 10:55:06+00:00): Cześć,

Byłem na miejscu.

Nazwa z regulaminu to Plac zabaw Olkówek, jednak ze względu na wyposażenie placu zabaw często jest wykorzystywana nazwa Park jurajski czy Jurajski plac zabaw. I to wyróżnia ten konkretny plac zabaw.
Może warto to dodać jako alt-name?
Andrzej3345 (2023-01-06 10:55:31+00:00): alt_name ?
Rogoyski (2023-01-06 11:48:57+00:00): Zgoda, dodam Jurajski Plac Zabaw w alt_name.
Andrzej3345 (2023-01-06 12:03:44+00:00): Super! Dziękuję.
emersonveenstra (2022-11-12 18:58:07+00:00): badly formatted phone number
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128538114
TimothyOnline (2022-11-12 20:38:05+00:00): Corrected per syntax.  Thanks.
MxxCon (2022-11-09 05:26:53+00:00): Hello.
What are you trying to map here? What is Dp?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128538226
jcr83 (2022-11-07 09:43:45+00:00): Même problème de suppression de building=yes sur l'EHPAD
uMatt-5 (2022-11-07 09:48:17+00:00): problème résolu !
eggie (2022-11-06 06:15:41+00:00): Nu edits in Nederland daarom.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NieWnen (2022-11-06 11:15:13+00:00): Dlaczego dodajesz budynki których nie widać na ortofotomapie i to jako wybudowane? Nawet w EGIB nie widać, żeby coś było.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1110622792
jslawin2 (2022-11-06 12:22:50+00:00): Wada importu. Zawsze można coś przeoczyć. Budynek został usunięty.
eggie (2022-11-06 06:23:10+00:00): Dag JC  Je vraagr feedback..

Lastig te beoordelen.

De hoofdregel is.. Wanneer er bv een landbouwvoertuig of bosvoertuig kan rijden (Dus breed genoeg is)  dan is het een highway=track Mogen er dan geen auto's e.d. rijden dan tag je motor_vehicle=no  en bv forestry=yes 

Is het werkelijk smal dan highway=path evt met accesstags
vehicle=no .. yes ?? 
De voorgaande mappers zijn ervaren mappers.. Dan ga ik er van uit dat ze goed hebben gekeken.
Dus ga nog eens na wat het hier zijn.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128538785

MVG
eggie
Bul Komorowski (2022-11-05 22:55:44+00:00): I've verified this street visually (road, path) on 2022-11-04. Not verified the entrance roads and the small bypass near Jomsborg.
Bul Komorowski (2022-11-05 22:59:02+00:00): ...though*
eggie (2022-11-06 06:27:16+00:00): JC  Op de track zelf staan geen accesstags.  Die horen er denk ik wel. 

(permit is meer bedoeld voor grote wildparken) zie wiki..
motor_vehicle=no  ?  forestry=yes? agricultural=yes 
Ook toevoegen aan slagboom.

Mapse
eggie
vasony (2022-11-28 06:48:23+00:00): jó tudni, pont ide "jártam"
map per (2022-11-06 06:23:01+00:00): Bezüglich review_requested:

Passt alles, danke!
maraf24 (2023-01-09 22:46:22+00:00): Orto 2021 jest nieaktualne.
Kasey2 (2023-01-09 23:47:42+00:00): Chyba zwróciło wtedy moją uwagę, że ulica jest bardziej prosta, niż była na OSM i na tym się skoncentrowałem. Dzięki za poprawienie
maraf24 (2023-01-10 12:00:19+00:00): Na OSM drogi są czasem sztucznie wykrzywione z powodu układu sąsiednich dróg, jak w tym miejscu z powodu skrzyżowania.
Tutaj chodziło mi o to, że ulica została przebudowana i to już było kiedyś przez mnie poprawione - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126041773
jeslop (2022-11-06 15:22:03+00:00): Reverted on changeset  #128559612. Reason: incorrect name change.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
jeffbezos54323 (2022-11-11 14:46:29+00:00): reverted