piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-03-22 10:19:38+00:00): I don't think so from how some routers handle them. Take for example OSRM, which equals trunk with motorway-like roads/expressways in Western Europe or North America, that basically makes them not usable for bike and pedestrian routing unless you tag them explicitly (as like what is being done in the US as they move from a usage of trunk based on construction to one based on importance).
Timmy_Tesseract (2022-04-04 00:22:34+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out! The commonly stated phrase that only motorways have implied access restrictions really doesn't seem to hold up.
DP24PH (2022-04-04 08:00:02+00:00): Likewise, Sir Timmy and Sir Jherome, in case of further highway=trunk tagging, we need to consider the separation of the sidewalks and/or bicycle paths (as needed via KartaView, Mapillary, Maxar) where existing railings or concrete jersey barriers (in case of most urban cities) could require us to independently map as such. In case of in-highway bicycle lane on divided highway, bicycle=yes, cycleway:[left/right]=lane, cycleway:[left/right]:separation:[left/right]=solid_line/bollard could work properly for most cases.


Paul/DP24
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-04-04 10:17:53+00:00): I'm not a fan of mapping sidewalks as separate ways and we generally do not do that here in the Philippines, but yes, we can have an exception if it's separated by impassable barrier (usually railing) or boulevard/grass strip.

On bike lanes, these should be mostly a road attribute, not a separate way. I’ve been remapping a lot of those which has been. Please remap the EDSA bike lanes; these should be at best tagged as road attribute.

Off-topic, but also related to your mapping of present EDSA is some problems with mapping Busway. There's actually no separated bus lane south of Estrella, and existing mapping is inaccurate.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-04-04 10:22:49+00:00): (Just missed a few more words) On bike lanes, these should be mostly a road attribute, not a separate way. I’ve been remapping a lot of those which has been mapped separately but is not separated by physical barrier. Please remap the EDSA bike lanes; these should be at best tagged as road attribute.
DP24PH (2022-04-05 02:08:59+00:00): Will check on both busway post-activation of #EDSACarousel Buendia station/bus stop (where it is present), and ongoing reintegration of cycleway into main highway=trunk  in phases as part of collaborated clean-ups.


DP24
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-04-05 03:41:37+00:00): Also don't forget removing verifying presence of concrete barrier on busway from Estrella to MOA. Some sections are separated only by painted yellow line(s) (sometimes mistaken for concrete barrier when mapping from aerial photo, as previous mapping of GenSan-Koronadal as divided), that are better tagged as lane change restriction. Check also latest Mapillary.
Tomas Straupis (2022-03-05 06:13:41+00:00): O ant lentelės rusiškai yra/bus parašyta? ;-) Ar visgi tik lietuviškai. Arba gal tik name, name:ua ir name:lt rašyti?
ChrissW-R1 (2022-03-04 11:52:10+00:00): changed buiding to building
ChrissW-R1 (2022-03-04 11:52:47+00:00): changed buiding to building
ChrissW-R1 (2022-03-04 11:52:54+00:00): changed buiding to building
BEO SILVA (2022-03-16 17:09:10+00:00): .
ChrissW-R1 (2022-03-04 11:53:03+00:00): changed Natural to natural
ChrissW-R1 (2022-03-04 11:53:14+00:00): changed nofer to noref
eggie (2022-03-04 11:54:40+00:00): Please don't shift the map in editmodus. This may harm the map.
eggie
marczoutendijk (2022-03-04 20:42:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5739
Mike_citadin (2022-04-07 11:58:39+00:00): Bonjour Alain, je suis surpris de la carto en path et cycle designated de ce sentier. J'ai pour souvenir d'un sentier étroit laissé à la nature.
Mickael
Mike_citadin (2022-04-07 11:59:13+00:00): Chemin #125421048
Al-Hun (2022-04-08 10:38:23+00:00): Bonjour,
le chemin est effectivement du type sentier (pas très large) mais praticable en VTT à la nuance près que parfois des arbres tombent en travers et restent parfois ainsi des mois avant d'être coupés... J'ai un peu hésité de ce fait, mais (et c'est la définition du wiki pour "designated") il y a un panneau (je l'ai pris en photo lors de mes relevés) qui affiche "Passage réservé vélos, piétons, chevaux". Après si tu préfères supprimer le tag cycle=designated par rapport à l'état actuel, je comprendrai sachant que "path" par défaut signifie accessible aux vélos. Ce n'est clairement pas une piste cyclable.
Alain.
Mike_citadin (2022-04-09 18:13:23+00:00): Ok, je n'avais pas connaissance de ce panneau. C'est vrai que ce serait mieux d'avoir un tag VTT. 
Attention, ton pont est de travers à l'ouest du sentier ;)
On se voit à la prochaine réunion osm lyon.
Mickael
Al-Hun (2022-04-11 19:50:26+00:00): Même pas en travers : c'est une curieuse passerelle métallique qui donne accès à une vieille vanne (probablement hors d'usage) sur le fossé qui rejoint la lône du Rhône.
Je te montrerai les photos lors de la réunion.
mef (2022-03-04 12:04:11+00:00): Das war nie ein Güterbahnhof.
mavl (2022-03-04 12:26:54+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted. This changeset add wrong name.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
bernardo60 (2022-03-05 13:55:50+00:00): These narrow ways to access residential areas are either "alley ways" or "paths" when they are only used by motorbikes and pedestrians. The name in Indonesian is "gang". There is no legal framework for "living street" how we know it in the West.
Fernandina1 (2022-03-08 09:42:58+00:00): Hi, bernardo60. Thank you for your message. I was following the OSM Wiki for living_street classifications in Indonesia (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads). These roads fit the description for “small way in residential area, it’s width around 1.5 - 2 meters, and can be passed by 1 car at low speed.” Here’s an example of KartaView (https://kartaview.org/details/2383962/101/track-info) for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037113870 which fits the description and shows the sign “GANG” at the entrance. 
Best regards,
Fernandina1
Sandal man (2022-03-10 22:43:07+00:00): Hola, gracias por la actualización de OSM, pero olvidaste las etiquetas aquí. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037117483

Saludos Jan
dsaneus (2022-03-12 17:31:25+00:00): Hola! Gracias por el aviso, ya está corregido.

Un saludo.
~dsaneus
aharvey (2022-03-05 04:41:25+00:00): This just looks like you're taking the piss. I believe Dian was just making the point that turn lanes shouldn't be split from the main way 100m up when it's just white paint that separates them, and instead you should use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes and similar tags. It doesn't mean you need to push the slip/link road so far that it's a 90 degree angle, for example https://osmcha.org/changeset/118114029 is a better middle ground in my opinion as it mostly keeps the way to the centerline of the road but avoids extreme 90 degree joins.
Supt_of_Printing (2022-03-06 03:28:59+00:00): Hi aharvey,
you're probably right, but out of frustration. I ask myself what the purpose is and keep coming back to one of the purposes being that of giving an indication of where and when to diverge. Whilst in the past I may have been a little too generous with the lead-in to a divergence, only showing a split where the physical barrier starts is also unhelpful as a divergent move needs to be a reasonable distance before the physical barrier. You yourself demonstrate the indecisive nature of this rule when you state "a better middle ground in my opinion . . .", so you yourself are being a bit arbitrary and not being strict with the letter of the rule. I would argue a better middle ground would be where the white line splits into a painted island or median. I treat painted hatched bars between outer painted lines as having the same purpose as the physical curb as I see this as the true spirit of the rule.

I also like to show smooth transitions where possible as this looks better and is more indicative of what is on the ground.

I hope this helps.

Supt.
eggie (2022-03-04 13:07:39+00:00): Dag Lemmer.. Ik heb wat aangepast conform de wiki van OSM 
met amenity=
en name=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dboat_rental

MVG
eggie
Superadlen (2022-03-04 12:38:48+00:00): merci de ne pas modifié
yves klein (2022-10-24 16:34:45+00:00): Hallo physi,
den Wert "access=military" kann ich im wiki nicht finden. Als definierte Werte kommen "no" oder "private" in Betracht.
2. Die Beschilderung für mil. Sicherheitsbereich lautet nicht "Betreten verboten", sondern "Unbefugtes Betreten verboten". Völlig zutreffend, denn es werden Betretungserlaubnisse für zahlreiche Nichtsmilitärs erteilt, für einzelne oder Gruppen, zum Teil auf Dauer, zum Teil für spezielle Zeiten oder Anlässe. Solch eine Genehmigungpraxis wird in osm als access=private abgebildet. Der access-Wert "private" bedeutet "nur mit Genehmigung". Er hat mit Eigentums-Verhältnissen, wie man von der Umgangssprache her glauben könnte, nichts zu tun). 
Beste Grüße aus Köln, Yves
Nakaner (2022-03-04 13:38:14+00:00): Hallo,

hör sofort mit diesem mechanischen Edit auf! Du hast ihn nicht vorab mit der Community abgesprochen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Viele Grüße

Michael
opendcc (2022-03-04 14:37:15+00:00): In diesem Zusammenhang habe ich mal die Autobahnen in meinem Revier geprüft und bin auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109379523 gestoßen. Dort sind bereits korrekt als 'concrete' getaggte Abschnitte in einem ähnlichen Stil zu asphalt geändert worden.
Nakaner (2022-03-04 15:03:16+00:00): Hallo,

auf der A 71 zwischen Schweinfurt und Suhl gibt es auch Beton-Abschnitte (laut Mapillary-Bildern von letztem Jahr), die er als Asphalt getaggt hat. Gerade läuft der Revert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2022-03-04 15:23:07+00:00): reverted by changesets 118097098, 118097028, 118097009, 118096988, 118096693 due to violation of the Automated Edits Code of Conduct and introducing wrong information into the database
Kovoschiz (2022-03-05 04:50:11+00:00): Please don't push your `official_name=`. 
N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-05 04:51:08+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
abakus_uploader (2022-03-04 23:32:17+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Kovoschiz (2022-03-05 04:55:08+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` the common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. 

This is already represented by Ho Man Tin Hill. The existing situation is the area is referred to as Ho Man Tin district.
eggie (2022-03-04 16:01:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mashin (2022-03-13 02:49:34+00:00): Hi,
Please don't use name=* tag on greens, fairways and holes. Hole number belong only to ref=* tag on golf=hole lines.
Thanks
user_5359 (2022-03-09 15:36:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037128174, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037128177. You add on booth footways the  tags
level = 1
level 1 = hairdresser
I assume you want only add a node inside of a building with tags
shop=hairdresser
level=1
?
Jose Luis Infante (2022-03-07 02:24:18+00:00): Hi,
please use Catastro or PNOA as image source for Spain ;)
Regards!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118093049
KVI0n (2022-03-09 07:43:07+00:00): Thanks. Yes, of course, I mainly use these sources that you are talking about, in rare cases other sources.
Małgorzata W (2022-03-04 20:56:27+00:00): jaka jest podstawa tych zmian? mieszkam w pobliżu i kolejny raz powtarzam, że w tym budynku nie znajduje się przedszkole, znajduje się tu posterunek policji, ( w innym miejscu niż zostało zaznaczone)  oraz ARiMR. Otaczający teren jest ogólnodostępny.  Nie ma żadnych podstaw, żeby oznaczać ten obszar jako "kindergarten".  Jest to kolejne błędne oznaczenie tego miejsca  przez Jurakk.
Małgorzata W (2022-03-06 21:49:11+00:00): link do zdjęć budynku i otoczenia tutaj: https://postimg.cc/gallery/jnXJrfC
user_14923509 (2022-03-16 19:09:58+00:00): Jurakk to XeZar66 / 66FBI - Gracz Pokémon GO / Ingress - robi edycje na OSM żeby usuwać innym graczom punkty z gier Niantic czy któryś z Adminów może zrobić z nim porządek?
SekeRob (2022-03-12 10:16:02+00:00): Hi,

You actually achieved for the whole island to show as forest and the small forest area as blank, double tagging both scrub and forest on the same MP with duplicate segments. I've now split it as intended with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118392368.
NB To me a very large area of scrub is more like grassland. Also, is that 'managed' forest or natural wood?

ciao
Pedalito (2022-03-12 13:45:04+00:00): Hi, 

thank you. I think, I have done a mistake here. Im not living in this country, so I can only interpreting the aerial imagery. But I think you are right, if you say its grassland.

My background knowledge about OSM Code is not so good. But in my mind, my intention while doing this changes was to delete an area, which was rendered as forest AND wood at the same time (or an other area with a similar problem). That I change the whole island into a forest wasnt my intention. Sorry for that.

I think this problem is now, after your changes solved.
reigi (2022-03-05 05:34:53+00:00): Hallo Michael, interessehalber würde mich interessieren, was der Ersteller der nodes mit seinem damaligen tagging beabsichtigt hat. Im Wiki ist zu "dummy=true" nichts zu finden. Gerne auch per PN wenn du es nicht öffentlich machen möchtest.
Michael712 (2022-03-07 13:46:18+00:00): Hallo reigi, ich hatte den Autor vor einem halben Jahr in einem seiner damaligen Changeset darauf angesprochen, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42705112 . Habe das jetzt wieder auf meiner TODO-Liste gefunden und abgearbeitet.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 06:04:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856200.
Vinber-Pro (2022-05-10 07:29:06+00:00): Bonjour,
il y a des discussions et des doutes sur la présence de cette voie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037135134

Vous pouvez nous en dire plus ?

Cette voie existe réellement ?

à bientôt
dirif_cct (2022-05-11 08:39:14+00:00): Bonjour, la rue existe dans la zone du chantier => Access no
L'erreur est entre la D19 et la voie de service de l'a86 où elle devrait avoir le tag construction.
A bientôt.
eggie (2022-10-11 08:22:05+00:00): Dag VeloJesse

Beter geen access=no taggen op wegen en paaltjes icm met andere tags.
Ik heb moped en mofa =yes toegevoegd hier.
access=no heb ik verwijderd.
Het is bijna altijd fout.
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2022-03-05 10:21:25+00:00): Hi georgie,

please be attentive, you dragged some nodes here, could you fix it?
user_5359 (2022-03-06 07:35:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1037137432. Short question to the booth tags
addr:teryt:simc=974133
addr:teryt:sym_ul=21271

Witam! Proszę zajrzeć na stronę https://www.osm.org/way/1037137432. Krótkie pytanie do znaczników kabiny
addr:teryt:simc=974133
addr:teryt:sym_ul=21271
Co oznaczają te dwa klucze i dlaczego nie można użyć istniejących kluczy teryt:simc i teryt:sym_ul?
What is the meaning of the two keys and why don't you use the existing keys teryt:simc and  teryt:sym_ul?
Mordechai23 (2022-03-06 09:07:32+00:00): Its a good question and frankly I don't know myself. I passed the issue to the project manager
Mordechai23 (2022-03-06 09:22:44+00:00): this issue seems to be related to the entire
#school_osmp https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gEx
user_5359 (2022-03-06 10:44:09+00:00): In the meantime, I have searched for the term "Teryt" (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/TERYT). According to this, a naming after ref:PL:teryt:simc (or shorter ref:PL:simc) would also be a clear definition of how the key is to be interpreted.

W międzyczasie wyszukałem termin "teryt" (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/TERYT). Zgodnie z tym nazewnictwo zgodne z ref:PL:teryt:simc (lub krótsze ref:PL:simc) byłoby również jasnym określeniem sposobu interpretacji klucza.
Dawid2849 (2022-03-06 10:53:29+00:00): We already use addr:city:simc to add SIMC on addresses

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:city:simc
user_5359 (2022-03-06 11:02:25+00:00): @DawidAlso the wiki article does not describe why a difference to teryt:simc exists here, it seems to be more of a filler article (after the redirection to the wiki page address was detected as an error). The first usage of this key was on 2022-02-20 (see http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm)
user_5359 (2022-03-08 06:37:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6227940459/history. What is the meaning of the tag Sankra=Bholu Ka Pura?
praeteritum (2022-06-26 05:57:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856119.
rjgambrel (2022-03-13 14:35:37+00:00): One of the changes you put in has an issue that you should address. The segment of 41st Street North between 40th and Kokanee actually has two ways. One is residential the the other is minor/unclassified. Also one of them does not connect to 40th. One more issue: The word avenue should never be abbreviated. It should be spelled out completely. This is an OSM "golden rule". Welcome to mapping! Am sure you will enjoy it!
JuanjoMC (2022-03-04 18:14:34+00:00): Hi, 

can you please explain what you are trying to accomplish here?

In this changeset you created a tiny polygon, which, BTW, is crossing some buildings, and made it part of a multipolygon with the main residential area as outer.

In this other changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118095098) you did the same thing and created another multipolygon relation.

Now the main residential area is part of two different multipolygons. This will soon start triggering validation errors.

Looking at aerial imagery, it seems that there are footways between the residential gardens where you drawn the new polygons. If your goal is to put them on the map, just do it, but there is no need to create those (multi) polygons for doing that, just draw the ways, tag them as foootways and that's it.

Cheers.

PS: Your changesets comments doesn't say much about your intentions, maybe you should have a look at this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Tom Ameye (2022-03-05 10:26:59+00:00): Hi Juan, indeed trying to map the footways. If I made a mistake you can correct of course.
I don't even know how to undo a complete changeset. Do you know how to do that?
Kind regards,
Tom
Tom Ameye (2022-03-05 10:49:27+00:00): What I want to achieve is that the polygon shows the exact area of the footways.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 05:54:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856095.
praeteritum (2022-06-26 05:52:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122856051.
EMREOYUN (2022-03-21 17:05:36+00:00): Merhaba, OpenStreetMap'a hoş geldiniz. Harita katkılarınız için öncelikle çok teşekkür ederiz ve ekleyebileceğiniz başka katkılarınız varsa eklemekten çekinmeyin :)
SomeoneElse (2022-03-10 12:09:34+00:00): Hello,

Whilst everyone can understand your revulsion at the illegal invasion of Ukraine by Russia and the ongoing humanitarian crisis there, vandalism of OpenStreetMap in Moscow is extremely unlike to influence the regime in the Kremlin.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-03-06 12:09:50+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037147302. What is the meaning of the tags
Education=and
Gartan=Outdoor
Training=Centre
?
user_5359 (2022-03-12 07:43:38+00:00): I remove the three tags...
Nakaner-repair (2022-03-04 15:21:07+00:00): Changesets outside Germany have not been reverted.
Nakaner-repair (2022-03-04 15:21:01+00:00): Changesets outside Germany have not been reverted.
Lopus (2023-06-26 12:39:17+00:00): Hi Nakaner-repair,
I saw this changset and wondered if you reverted housy76's previous edits because
a) the changeset is too large
b) it was a mechanical edit (and maybe not discussed beforehand?)

As I am currently checking possibilities of adding exactly this tag to roads I know, and which would be to tedious to do in Streetcomplete, I wanted to check with you before I create changesets which are then again reverted.
Would be great if you can tell me if and how it is ok to do this in a automated manner.

My current idea looks like this:
- check for a small area in overpass area the motorways/secondary/tertiary roads which are missing the surface-tag
- when in doubt, check myself or via BING etc if the surface is actually asphalt
- edit these roads via osmapi in Python

Would be great to hear from you!
Best, Lopus
kartonage (2022-03-04 15:40:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully. Please don't add fictional data.
eggie (2022-03-04 16:10:41+00:00): Matthijs.. Je zegt zelf dat er een C1 bord (zone)  staat.  Dan is het toch geen highway=pedestrian?
Nakaner-repair (2022-03-04 15:20:57+00:00): Changesets outside Germany have not been reverted.
Nakaner (2022-03-04 15:20:38+00:00): Changesets outside Germany have not been reverted.
eggie (2022-03-04 15:59:34+00:00): Beste Matthijs...En toch is het niet correct wat je doet. Je hoeft niet op de kaart te zien dat er geen auto's mogen. Die mogen er trouwens wel op bepaalde tijden. Het was allemaal juiste correct getagd.
Het gaat om de juiste accesstags.
vehicle=no    Dat hoort bij een een C1 bebording.
Het is hier geen voetgangers gebied. De rest van Gouda is ook gewoon verkeerd gemapt. 
Wanneer er een bord Voetgangersgebied staat dan zou het wel highway=pedestrian zijn.

MVG
eggie
Supaplex030 (2022-03-07 09:24:48+00:00): parking:lane:right=no_stopping (nach neuem Schema wohl "no") + parking:lane:right:surface=asphalt - ist das sinnvoll? ;)