piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2020-02-01 11:09:23+00:00): Hallo Andi,
diese beiden P-Wege
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762731566/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762731564/history
liegen teilweise übereinander. Das sollte so nicht sein.
Überarbeitest Du das nochmal?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-02-16 11:37:31+00:00): Keine Reaktion, Schade!
P-Wege berichtigt
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-26 16:44:13+00:00): What construction=yes represents here?

For example in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7127056890/history

What is source of this address data?  (they were added on scale and in way that strongly suggest import from external data)
Mohamed_Gamal (2022-10-26 19:41:02+00:00): Dear Mateusz Konieczny,
I hope you are doing well,

The source of this address data was the Local Survey and the satellite Image more than 2 years ago, and there is no import from external data or "copy and paste". I committed to the golden rules of the OSM community.

I used Tag "construction=yes" referring to the building not existing or is not complete. as you can check this link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:construction=yes

Regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-13 11:32:49+00:00): > I used Tag "construction=yes" referring to the building not existing or is not complete

Well, this building can be used for example on buildings - but it is very, very unusual for addresses
Mohamed_Gamal (2022-12-13 11:44:30+00:00): Dear Mateusz Konieczny,

Well, I got your point about the Tag "construction=yes" regarding buildings and it is unusual for addresses.

Best regards,
BikePC (2020-01-14 11:35:41+00:00): Ik heb de landuse rondom de Zuidweg (vanaf Kleurlaan) en een stukje Oostweg nog wat netter gelegd aan de hand van PDOK 25cm latest. Gras liep door tot over de weg, etc..
eggie (2020-01-14 11:54:56+00:00): Hoi,
Helemaal prima... Ik heb hier een startende mapper geholpen door de paden los te maken van de landuse.
Betreffende mapper is bezig de Avond4daagse voor te bereiden.
foot=use_sidepath is van sommige fietspaden verdwenen, want de route loopt over de fietspaden. Ik heb het maar even zo gelaten. Er stonden ook fietspaden onterecht op slot voor voetgangers.
Je moet maar eens kijken. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jstrorma/history#map=14/52.0535/4.4851
MVG,
Eggie
Jarek 🚲 (2020-01-12 22:37:55+00:00): Very much incomplete, but it should be better than before, and unfortunately I don't have a whole lot of time
GeoJess (2020-04-07 19:13:08+00:00): Hi Libithina, 

I was wondering about the reasoning with the deletion for Way: 673276843 (tertiary road). This major road exists in most of the other imageries. 

Thanks,
Jesspher
Libithina (2020-04-07 20:55:09+00:00): Dear Jesspher,

This change is from 3 months ago. My apologies if I can't exactly explain what my reasoning was.
My method is to use the aerial imagery only. (the other's never worked very well for me). 
Two things could have happened:
1. The road wasn't there (anymore/yet) on the aerial imagery.
2. The road was drawn in so badly that it wasn't close to any road on my image which made me remove it, and add a road in on the physical location according to the aerial image.

If the road is now there (I assume the aerial images get updates regularly as well), then feel free to add it in.

Apologies if I made a mistake on this road.

Best wishes,
Libithina
GeoJess (2020-04-09 17:14:06+00:00): No worries Libithina! Thanks for explaining

Regards,
Jesspher
eggie (2020-01-13 07:25:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Bedankt voor je bijdrage.. Probeer in het vervolg op de BAG adresnode bij te taggen. Ik heb de info samengevoegd.
Tip .. Gebruik voor Nederland niet de BING , maar de pdok actueel als achtergrond. 
MVG,
Eggie
R4FF7 (2020-01-13 15:28:52+00:00): Bedankt voor de tips, Eggie! Zal er de volgende keer op letten.
viloan (2020-01-12 23:51:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abakus_uploader (2020-01-13 23:30:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MKnight (2020-01-22 20:26:05+00:00): Moin, beim Strasse teilen bitte auch drauf achten, dass oneway, :forward und :backward stimmen.
Selbes Problem auf der Auffahrt in Gegenrichtung, wo noch access dazukommt
Rurido (2020-01-23 19:46:24+00:00): Sollte jetzt passen, gerne nochmal drüberschauen :)
pangoSE (2020-01-18 17:36:26+00:00): Hej!
Du verkar gilla lägga in vägar, har du testat MapWithAI tillägget?
Det är jättebra!
Palolo (2020-04-02 15:30:30+00:00): @StenSoft thanks for your help mapping Samoa. What is the source for the Vaitele extension? I haven't been there for a while and the extension doesn't show up on imagery sources. Faafetai
NyanSten (2020-04-02 22:56:54+00:00): I was there in January but I am not sure if it ends at that small road (which my taxi took) or goes further. You can see it on Mapillary: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-13.83968043142356&lng=-171.75981754453085&z=17&pKey=DN3CnImaxxwFGeFjj0fotA&focus=photo
Palolo (2020-04-03 23:39:22+00:00): Thanks, good intel, unless it continues through towards Fagali'i it probably shouldn't be highway=secondary
viloan (2020-01-13 01:02:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
camelCaseNick (2020-01-19 20:55:52+00:00): Hey,
I see, you have here an incorrect subject:wikidata value. Though are you sure, subject:wikidata is here better, than flag:wikidata=Q2166712?
CamelCaseNick
Minh Nguyen (2020-01-22 09:19:08+00:00): Thanks for catching that copy-pasta; fixed in changeset 79904988.
aachso (2020-01-13 09:39:12+00:00): Hello mcccl, welcome to OSM! Please don't make changesets spanning this large of an area, as it makes reviewing them very difficult for others. Thanks.
mcccl (2020-01-14 03:25:10+00:00): Sorry, that was my first edit and I didn't know everything exactly. I tryed to chnage that in hte following changes.
angys (2020-05-25 15:20:40+00:00): Why there is a Lintang Damai 1 for railway landuse?
UncoolGuyJake (2020-05-26 13:58:04+00:00): Thank you for bringing that to my attention, it seems I added that tag in error whilst conducting ground work in country. It has now been removed. 

Have a great day!
DaveF (2020-01-14 01:45:58+00:00): Hi Mac'
Could you clarify the significance of the colours tag?

You've created new NCN 1 relations. What is their purpose?
MacLondon (2020-01-15 02:27:46+00:00): Hi,

Red is the official colour on NCN route and the background colour for route numbers on signs.

Use of colour for routes is mentioned in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Tags.

This colour tag is used by e.g. https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13!51.4031!-0.2934 to set the colour used to underline route numbers.

In a similar vein, the osmc:symbol tag is used with hiking route, e.g. https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=10058046

Regarding new NCN 1 relations: there are alternative NCN 1 route sections that hadn't been mapped as part of the NCN, e.g. sections that would have to be used to follow NCN 1 when https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605748677 is closed at night.

Also, as a relation:route should be one continuous line of travel, I've mapped branching sections of NCN 1 in individual relations where necessary. In practice, this make identifying gaps or similar errors in any type of relation:route easier.

Regards,

Mac
DaveF (2020-01-15 15:42:39+00:00): Hi
Thanks for the notes on colour.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/PLB
It's lead to situation of there now being at least 18 different relations for NCN 1 (and that excludes links (1)). It's lead to error & confusion Note how their tags vary. One of the main reasons for the introduction of relations was to easily tag it once & apply to the whole relation. Some are nested 3 deep (1992599 > 75880 > 10564435) I'm unaware of the benefits of that.

I see no advantage in alternate routes being given unique relations.
user_5359 (2020-12-22 20:35:07+00:00): I revert this change set (not existing admin_level=1 boundary, no response of the author)
ayxis (2020-01-27 10:29:46+00:00): Hallo j1scard!
In diesem Änderungssatz sind die Relationen 6755254 und 8540199 etwas in Mitleidenschaft gezogen worden, d.h. es fehlen bei beiden Relationen wichtige Mitglieder um diese vollständig und korrekt anzeigen zu können.
Gelten diese Abbiegebeschränkungen denn noch? 
LG 
ay_deniz
j1scad (2020-01-28 23:56:58+00:00): Habe die Abbiegebeschränkungen korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis.

Grüße
Polarbear-repair (2020-05-15 21:15:52+00:00): Auch hier werden Objekte gelöscht, um sie in leicht veränderter Geometrie neu zu zeichnen.
Crogan (2020-01-13 14:52:44+00:00): Спасибо конечно за добавленную дорогу, только она больше не существует :) Зачем нужно было мои развязки и кольцо удалять? Я рисовал по своим трекам. Снимки уже устарели, сейчас ситуация такая: https://www.google.ru/maps/@53.8385251,91.3430918,879m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=ru  
Сообщение нужно было мне написать, вместе бы обсудили.
mavl (2020-01-26 07:16:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
viloan (2020-01-13 03:07:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ajf3934221 (2020-01-13 12:26:35+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
mavl (2020-01-26 07:16:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Alan Bragg (2020-03-01 12:51:48+00:00): The old Maine E911 addresses for all the houses on Paris Hill Drive is Old Route 26
I'm not local so I can't verify.
moreno96 (2020-03-10 09:24:34+00:00): سلام.
ویرایش شما باعث شده مشکلاتی برای خطوط بزرگراه بسیج شهر تهران پیش بیاد.
گویا خط، اشتباها کشیده شده، یا نقاطی از این خط حذف شده باشن.
لطفا تصحیح بکنید نقشه رو
Palolo (2020-03-04 17:12:27+00:00): Thank you for your OSM contributions in Samoa. What is the source of your administrative boundaries please?
marc__marc (2020-05-25 12:28:36+00:00): Hello,
and it's not the boundary of a super-national organization
Regards,
Marc
Palolo (2020-05-25 13:23:34+00:00): Thank you for the reply. I don't understand the source of the line locations please.
marc__marc (2020-05-25 13:26:27+00:00): no idea, I'm not Mateusz_P_90110 :)
Palolo (2020-05-25 13:36:59+00:00): Got it, sorry.
user_5359 (2020-12-22 05:32:31+00:00): Is anyone against the revert of this technical wrong entry ?
Palolo (2020-12-22 05:48:26+00:00): Sounds like a good idea.
user_5359 (2020-12-22 20:34:42+00:00): I revert this change set (not existing admin_level=1 boundary, no response of the author)
hanchao (2020-05-20 02:09:12+00:00): 国奥村怎么标注成温泉花园了。请不要破坏地图，你的修改我还原了。
hanchao (2020-05-20 02:11:31+00:00): 在这里还原了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85468950
mavl (2020-01-26 07:16:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
DiogoBaptista98 (2020-01-22 15:26:28+00:00): what have you done around rossio and praça da figueira? you have destroyed the pedonal areas around it.
Josef K (2020-01-27 04:36:07+00:00): No destruction took place. As stated in the summary, pedestrian areas have been converted to the area:highway scheme, which is more maintainable.

Also for simplicity/maintainability, multipolygons where a sidewalk area was surrounding a whole block and buildings inside had a "inner" role have been converted into simpler adjacent polygons with the sidewalks. Multipolygon relations are not needed for this.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-23 00:40:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79942373 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with obviously fake data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-23 00:40:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79942373 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with obviously fake data.
DiogoBaptista98 (2020-01-25 04:30:33+00:00): you have deleted a lot of pedestrian areas and roads on this area, please fix it or letme know if i can do it for you. please dont destroy others people work. thank you.
Josef K (2020-01-27 04:59:31+00:00): No destruction has taken place. Just a conversion into a saner, more maintainable scheme.

What happened was a conversion of some "highway=pedestrian; area=yes" areas to the "area:highway=footway" etc. The areas remain there. And the conversion was limited, still many ares in the previous scheme.
ivanbranco (2022-05-15 07:09:23+00:00): Hi Denys,

you added many lines without tags, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762773760/history
are these supposed to be barrier=wall?
user_5359 (2020-01-13 15:26:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-23 00:40:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79942373 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with obviously fake data.
viloan (2020-01-13 05:38:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2020-01-13 05:38:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ndm (2020-01-13 23:31:00+00:00): This turn restriction is incorrect -- it has been reverted.
NikitaSalt (2020-01-14 15:43:22+00:00): Hi! You are correct. It is my bad, didn't pay attention that this sign is placed after the intersection and related to the next one. Thank you for reaching out!
TG-map4 (2020-01-13 15:40:13+00:00): Hello volojusa,

the edits you are making are kind of a problem. You are drawing simple service roads but do not specify them any further. That's not enough. Please read the wiki page, there are more tags than just "highway=service": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice. I recommend at least that you specify which service road type it is and you should specify the access! Because now, these roads you have drawn into the map are all PUBLIC! That means, navigation software uses these roads to route people, vehicle etc. which is WRONG. For example, the road you have added around the company "edoc solutions ag" is a PRIVATE one in real life! Nobody is allowed to use this road except the employees of this company. So you must tag this road with "access=private". Please do/correct this in this changeset and all of your changes before prior to making new additions. You should also tell your coworkers of the Amazon mapping team. Because with this kind of mapping it is kind of an improvement (adding something) but also a worsening of the map quality (wrong information).

One question: You map for Amazon logistics, but why are these roads necessary for your 
logistics software? The road around "edoc solutions ag" is private, no logistics company is allowed to use this road. All cars with delivery goods need to stop on the main road "Metternicher Straße" and must go to the front door and ring the door bell there. So i guess the owner of "edoc" is not happy about this change making his private property visible as public in an open map.

Kind Regards
PT-53 (2020-01-13 16:16:39+00:00): @TG-map4
Und wer bist Du?
TG-map4 <> KrEU-map2 .... ?
TG-map4 (2020-01-13 16:49:56+00:00): Hallo PT-53.
Was meinst du mit "Und wer bist du?". Ich bin ein anderer Mapper, dem die Bearbeitungen dieses Mitglieds aufgefallen sind. Bitte sage mir, wo du meinen alten Benutzernamen entdeckt hast. Ich hatte mich mal umbenannt und dachte das ist überall angepasst gewesen, anscheinend ja doch nicht.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-13 18:37:05+00:00): @TG-map4 
Du hast gerademal 7 Änderungssätze und kümmerst Dich um Änderungen von anderen Mappern. Dazu noch der Namenswechsel. Da frage ich mich halt ob Du mehrere Accounts hast.

Namenswechsel:
http://whosthat.osmz.ru/?id=8996599
volojusa (2020-01-14 11:04:21+00:00): Hi TG-map4 ,
Thank you for looking into my edit. This edit was based partially on the GPS trace of our driver partner. I have not added the private access tag as there was not sufficient information due to the lack of street level imagery. I understand your concerns about the routing algorithms making use of a private road and  I am in complete alignment with you on it. I will take this as a lesson and will make use of it in my future edits. At Amazon we are dedicated to add meaningful data towards the OSM. I would request you to please change the edit performed by me as you have the local knowledge of the area. Let me know in case you have any other suggestions. Always happy to learn from the local community.

Best regards
volojusa
TG-map4 (2020-01-14 17:28:34+00:00): @volojusa: Thanks for the explanation. I have corrected it at this place.
@PT-53: Ich kenne OpenStreetMap schon länger und war bisher nur "passiver" Mitleser und kenne bspw. das Forum oder diese Kommentare hier an Änderungen. Nun bin ich aktiv selber dabei.
user_5359 (2020-01-13 15:21:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
4004 (2020-01-19 22:47:50+00:00): здравствуйте,
дороги без типа - это не про город. во дворах сервис, на южном вернул жилую - она по приоритету такая же.
обьясните, чего вы хотите добиться, может помогу?
4004 (2020-01-19 22:50:20+00:00): садакова уже и так приоритетная - можете проставить покрытия на тех, где не хотите приоритета (если не везде асфальт)
user_5359 (2020-01-13 14:34:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-23 00:40:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79942373 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with obviously fake data.
eggie (2020-01-13 07:59:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie