piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GOwin (2016-01-28 03:52:51+00:00): @vichwinn

re nodes tagged as `public_transport=stop_position` are not, at all, superfluous.  It may appear like that in  OsmAnd (which, btw, I use and recommend, too) but those nodes are functional and exist in the real world, and follows the OSM precept of `one feature, one element`.

The only reason those "dots" are not visible in other stations is that they haven't been mapped yet. Besides, we never, ever should map for the "renderer."

The mapping process is never complete, and the OSM platform generously allow us to store these data, even if they're considered as work in progress.

As for the case of stations being stop positions by default, that is not always a safe assumption. We have (or used to? I dunno these days) LRT "express trains" that only load/unload passengers on select stations. A *completely* tagged public transport route, can make use of stops, routes, trips, schedules, etc. to develop "ideal" routes.  OSM data is not just used for rendering maps, they are also usable for many other routing apps - elements of which are not always visibly apparent for other users - but the data, the building blocks are there.

If you feel this case needs to be discussed more extensively, we have several community channels where this can be done:

* [Chat Room](https://goo.gl/X2XeQE)
* [FB page](http://fb.com/OSMph)
* [FB community](https://www.facebook.com/groups/175398442797542)
* [Goolge Plus](https://goo.gl/qk7cfn)
* [Mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/)

Kindly consider reverting the affected changesets.
vichwinn (2016-01-28 05:18:03+00:00): @GOwin

Hi, Im going to revert my changesets but please answer me this. The map is in baclaran station link image below.

http://s12.postimg.org/rfy5gefgd/baclaran2.jpg

That 2 dot indicates the deleted nodes which is stop position in a rail.
I need to know what will the names of those 2 green dot on a "single" rail. Or maybe someone add another rail which will be south & north and tag it as platform 1 & 2 stop position.
Im going to revert it after you answer this. 
Thanks and sorry for this trouble and likewise to ianlopez1115
GOwin (2016-01-28 05:49:36+00:00): Name tags are not necessary to tag features, so there is no need to add them, as is the case here.

In an ideal network route map, both physical railways can be added. But, taking advantage of the flexibility of OSM relations make this unnecessary.

I hope I understood your question correctly. Thank you.
CloCkWeRX (2016-01-24 23:28:24+00:00): Ah nice!
sander79 (2016-02-12 13:21:02+00:00): Het eerste stuk van de Einsteindreef (vanaf de Henry Dunantplein) staat nog op 70. Moet dat niet 50 zijn ?
GerdP (2016-01-24 08:28:34+00:00): Hi there!
You created some ways with
highway=purposed here.
Did you mean highway=proposed ?
Gerd
Brian@Brea (2016-01-24 08:29:33+00:00): Yes, I will fix it right now
GerdP (2016-01-24 08:33:38+00:00): Ok, thanks
zstadler (2017-12-17 12:42:01+00:00): NOTE:
This changeset has created and then deleted of 2 ways and a relation.
.
Initially, the nature reserve was modeled using a relation with two ways.
Subsequently, a single way was used instead:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392924300
limes11 (2022-09-27 17:20:22+00:00): Hi, 

ist zwar sechs Jahre her, aber sind diese motorroad=yes tags hier auf der B77 korrekt? Anonym hat eine Reihe von Hinweisen gesetzt, dass dem nicht so sei. Auf Mapillary-Bilder sehe ich dafür auch keinen Indiz. Die Bilder sind aber auch schon recht alt.

VG Limes
puma515 (2022-10-06 21:45:28+00:00): Ist nach ortskenntniss angepasst.

Der vollständigkeit halber hier die links zum Hinweise und zur Anpassung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3375817
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127115104#map=13/54.2674/9.6532

VG puma515
RicoElectrico (2017-05-26 23:32:09+00:00): Why is the name in German? Also, is actually anything there and not just a bunch of bricks? Because I don't see anything in aerial imagery besides slightly greener grass.
heina (2017-05-27 06:54:11+00:00): The language is not limited only to English. 
Secondly, this area belonged up to 8th May 1945 to German Reich. The ruins are visible for me, no doubt. For checking of the area other satellite imageries than from OpenStreetMap can be used: 
https://binged.it/2rIDBgN
https://yandex.ru/maps/?ll=18.736045%2C54.313684&z=19&l=sat%2Cskl
RicoElectrico (2017-05-27 21:06:09+00:00): Obviously, this is Poland, so name fields should be in Polish - and this fits more description:de.

Besides that, building=chapel seems an overstatement. I actually don't know how to tag this, building=ruins seems too much either as there's even no foundations visible (Normally when houses are being built, you see them easily on sat images).
heina (2017-05-28 07:58:33+00:00): The name is in German because this is the original name of the Mennonite chapel. I see there no problem. The object is for me clearly a ruin tag. The house foundation is visible.
gileri (2016-01-24 18:07:31+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour la déchèterie que vous avez cartographiée (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392930801), il existe des tags dédiés :

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#D.C3.A9chetterie_ou_d.C3.A9ch.C3.A8terie

Ces tags permettent de pouvoir trouver toutes les déchèteries ou déterminer ce qui est recyclable, etc.

Éric
luiswoo (2016-01-23 10:36:01+00:00): в смысле, вот так прямо и идёт прямо по домам участкам?
maraf24 (2016-01-24 13:06:24+00:00): Prosze spróbować jeszcze raz.
Tym razem tak,by adresy znalazły się w obrębie budynku, a nie poza nim.
Proszę się kierować obrysem (dokładnym) budynku, a nie perspektywą zdjęcia lotniczego.
literan (2016-02-03 12:08:42+00:00): Вы зачем с этого здания https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29731040 удалили тег healthcare=clinic??? На точку не перенесли, попрошу вернуть. И вообще, заканчивайте с переносами тегов с территории на точку в здании. Это противоречит вики и общей практике.
uryevich (2016-02-03 12:22:08+00:00):  literan, Вы ошиблись пакетом правок.
literan (2016-02-03 12:23:57+00:00): ой, прошу прощения :(
SomeoneElse (2016-02-02 01:51:57+00:00): The changeset comment here says "Added from Bing and OS OOC 1.25K" yet the elevation isn't visible on either quoted source.  Where did it come from?
CYM1988 (2016-02-02 13:54:39+00:00): Hi, I used Bing and OS OOC for location, the elevation was from a notice from a local walking group displayed in nearby Priest Weston which I saw on a recent visit to the area.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-16 12:29:21+00:00): Can you provide a photograph?  It's unusual to have to ask for this, but many of your other sources simply don't seem trustworthy so providing some actual evidence would be helpful here.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-09-23 06:46:29+00:00): Nie używamy spacji w numerach: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=392946658
thomersch (2016-01-24 15:39:10+00:00): Cześć Robak,
Przeglądałem dane w okolicach Szyman i napotkałem na Twoje ostatnie zmiany. Niestety nie jestem pewien, co chciałeś osiągnąć relacją nr 5892600. Jest to multipolygon, który nie ma żadnych parametrów. Proponuje usunąć tą relacje. 

Jeżeli potrzebujesz pomocy z jakimiś korektami, chętnie pomogę.

Pozdrawiam
Thomas
Robak (2016-01-24 20:45:16+00:00): Cześć. Ale jeśli usunę relację to wówczas wszystkie łąki w lesie, które są pozaznaczane na zachód od lotniska przestaną być widoczne, prawda? Jeśli się mylę daj znać to usunę relację. Przed chwilą próbnie usunąłem relacje i taki właśnie efekt się pojawił.
thomersch (2016-01-25 20:42:47+00:00): Przejrzałem relacje i okazało się, że linia wewnątrz jej była określona jako forest, jednak relacja sama nie nosiła żadnych parametrów, więc naniosłem forest na relacje i usunąłem z linii.
Teraz powinno być poprawnie moim zdaniem. Łąki teraz są widoczne i dane są semantycznie poprawne.
Jednak lasy w całej okolicy nie wyglądają wcale dobrze, wszędzie są ogromne relacje, podzielone w kompletnie bezsensownych miejscach. W sumie trzeba by było się tym zająć, ale to już zadanie na inny raz ;)
Robak (2016-01-26 12:17:06+00:00): Dzięki.
Co do relacji innych kompleksów leśnych w tej okolicy może stąd był mój problem. Bo ja rozgrzebałem jeden z nich. Faktycznie warto by to poukładać. 

Ja jednak wolę bardziej taką drobną, szczegółową robotę w konkretnych miejscach niż takie kompleksowe poprawianie atrybutów.
Supaplex (2016-02-07 12:30:45+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
user_5359 (2016-01-24 06:22:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forget to mark the node as dentist. Did you really near by the street? Send a message if you need help to move the point into one of the buildings.
SafwatHalaby (2026-02-22 20:11:12+00:00): Hello. Is "the acorn picnic site" an invented translation or is that how it is on the sign?

Inventing translations is usually bad practice, and if there's no in-use English name transliteration is preferred
Harel M (2026-02-22 20:18:34+00:00): This was edited 10 years ago, expecting me to remember what I did there after so long is not practical.
Having said that, I usually don't invent names, so I'm guessing that if I mapped it this way it's probably was written on a sign somewhere, but you are welcome to check it.
eggie (2019-07-28 09:06:27+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
utack (2016-01-23 16:18:44+00:00): Moin und guten Start bei OSM!

Eine kleine Anmerkung zum ersten Beitrag:
Es ist normal üblich den "name" nur einmal einzutragen, entweder am Gebäude oder auf einem Punkt. 
Aktuell ist es nicht falsch, aber schöner wäre es wenn
- entweder das amenity=shop zusammen mit name=Cafe und Feinkost Honigtopf nur als Eigenschaft des Gebäudes eingetragen werden, und der Punkt einfach nur als disused:bakery bestehen bleibt
- oder beides nur als Eigenschaft des Knoten Eingetragen wird, und das Gebäude dann keinen name=Cafe Honigtopf mehr hat
Ich hoffe es ist hilfreich und verständlich was ich meine, ist nicht als Kritik gemeint.
Viele Grüße
Jakob
gileri (2016-01-23 22:37:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a quelques points qui peuvent être améliorés pour cet élément :

- Je crois qu'un coquille s'est glissée dans le numéro de téléphone.

- Le format de l'adresse du site web devrait commencer par http://

- Le nœud d'adresse existe déjà; en copiant les attributs sur les "POI" cela duplique les adresses. Normalement les moteurs de recherches savent lier les lieux avec l'adresse la plus proche, donc les infos d'adresse ne sont pas obligatoires. Si une adresse de contact explicite vous paraît nécessaire pour cet établissement, il y a possibilité d'utiliser le préfixe contact:* à la place de addr:*, par exemple contact:housenumber.
thepriben (2016-01-23 23:01:48+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour les remarques. J'ai essayé de corriger au mieux. 

Bonne soirée :)
gileri (2016-01-23 23:03:17+00:00): Nickel en effet !

Bonne soirée/nuit vu l'heure :)
PlaneMad (2016-01-26 11:39:27+00:00): Nice work on the edits here. Have added some more detail at the SDAT grounds. Can you please check if they are correct.
Marych_ (2016-01-25 05:14:08+00:00): Вы поправли 61-й дом
Похоже что вы местный
а где тогда находится дет ский сад 256 ?
WEBERMAN (2016-01-25 05:44:30+00:00): Привет, да я живу в этом районе. Но сам не с Ташкента, просто было интересно как это здесь все устроено вот поробывал. ;)
EneaSuper (2016-01-23 15:30:57+00:00): Scontrini? XD
sabas88 (2016-01-23 15:33:02+00:00): Ottima fonte di partite iva e civici :-)
EneaSuper (2016-01-23 23:12:46+00:00): Aaahhh ok, quindi ne hai approfittato per mappare i negozi da cui provengono, good u.u
naoliv (2016-01-23 16:14:47+00:00): ?????????????
luschi (2016-01-23 16:38:49+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/b/b2/Bridge-Junction-Connection.png
naoliv (2016-01-23 16:40:28+00:00): And what about the empty relation that you have created? I guess you know how to use it, right?
And please: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
luschi (2016-01-23 16:53:54+00:00): The I've made for you so that you have something to complain about
naoliv (2016-01-23 16:59:05+00:00): How childish...
luschi (2016-01-23 17:03:46+00:00): Oh, thanks for the compliment
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 22:47:46+00:00): AT: revert Changeset: 36758426, for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source;
in 48516719
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 22:44:41+00:00): already repaired by other user in 40798897
titivi (2016-01-23 14:30:42+00:00): je viens de faire une c ... et ne sais la réparer : je pensais agir sur une aire locale (et me servait de celle-ci en exemple :-( et ml'aperçois que je viens de faire une modif ...
trigpoint (2016-01-24 19:37:42+00:00): Hi
You seem to have added a peak named Bromlow Callow.
Applying my local knowledge, and applying my own local knowledge, Bromlow Callow is neither a peak or where you have placed it.
Out of copyright OS maps show a trigpoint (which may or may not still exist) but no elevation and this point is unnamed. What is the source of this information you have used?
CYM1988 (2016-01-24 21:33:47+00:00): Hi, I have recently visited this area and thought to make a survey. The hill here is small but is listed in British hill databases along with name and elevation which I have then corrobarated using GPS. The trigpoint is still present and does further add elevation information. I will check again however to make sure all is correct
trigpoint (2016-01-24 22:36:49+00:00): Bromlow Callow is a rounded hill to the north, with a wood at the top. It is very distinctive and is very well known to Shropshire walkers. The top is too flat to consider it having a summit.
The grid reference in the database is not for the trigpoint.
I do wonder how the database is compiled, grid references and the elevations matching OS do suggest much of it is a derived work from OS data and as such is probably not something we can use in OSM.
As a GPS owner I am very aware that elevation does almost never mach what is shown on an OS map, had the data been derived from surveys.
CYM1988 (2016-01-24 23:07:39+00:00): I shall recheck the licensing information related to the data to be sure. I am aware that it must meet OSM's import and licence criteria and thus cannot contain any OS derived data unless from OOC maps. I will also correct the location, I thought to add this seeing as it is a named hill and so could be good to have on OSM, and the highest part of ground tagged as the summit, though the term 'peak' might be stretching it
SomeoneElse (2016-01-25 10:28:51+00:00): Re "I shall recheck the licensing information" (given that the elevation here doesn't seem to have come from an Open source):

As previously discussed the DoBIH http://www.hills-database.co.uk/downloads.html is licensed according to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_GB and according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility is incompatible because of incompatible attribution requirements.  If you want to explicitly use their data you'll need to get direct permission.  In http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33256350 you said that you would do this.  Have you done so and if so what was the result?
CYM1988 (2016-01-25 10:49:33+00:00): Hi, yes I did ask permission to use the information, I explained it was for the purpose of using in OSM and was given permission to use the data under a different licence, the Open Data Open Database Licence (ODbl) as I was explained that this would be the best way to make it compatible with the attribution constraints of OSM. They said usually Creative Commons licences are acceptable for most purposes but I suppose its the guarantee of onward attribution thats the sticking point on that licence. The said for me to email back if any further issues. Imports certainly do seem to be a legal minefield!
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 22:41:52+00:00): DE: revert 36758967 , for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects w/o specifying a source; moving objects for the renderer;
in 48516610
Endres Pelka (2016-01-24 18:08:20+00:00): Please do NOT merge ways which are parts of different boundary relations.
Nakaner (2016-09-13 17:32:44+00:00): Hi Michael,

I hope you are aware that Vienna is located in Austria and the local language is German? Vienna is called Wien in German. As German is the main language in Austria, name=* tags in Austria are in German (exceptions exist but not in Vienna).

Is "Mozarthaus Vienna" signed outside the building or the official name of the museum?

Luckily, your editor is Potlatch, not MAPS.ME (I am currently reverting a bunch of MAPS.ME changesets).

Best regards

Michael
MichaelCollinson (2016-09-14 11:44:52+00:00): Hi Michael,
I am very aware and extremely careful to name in the local language, (with also name:en if appropriate/helpful to English speakers).

Yes, according to http://www.mozarthausvienna.at (in German), Mozarthaus Vienna is the official name. They use the same name www.mozarthausvienna.at/en English version. The most relevant Wikipedia page also refers to it by this name:  https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozartwohnung

Happy Mapping,
Michael
SomeoneElse (2016-09-25 15:40:57+00:00): Hello, is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46342371/history signed as a public bridleway?  If so, adding the tag "designation=public_bridleway" will make it clear what the legal status is.
Also, if it's wide enough for 4-wheeled traffic (e.g. tractors) then it should really be a "highway=track" rather than a "highway=bridleway".  The imagery suggests that at least the western part of this way is - it's not clear about the eastern part (unfortunately although I've walked north and south through Rudyard many times I've never been this far west, so can't offer my personal recollection).
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just trying to help.  Any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Andy
SomeoneElse (2016-12-12 22:37:10+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392993754 is?  It doesn't have any tags on it.
Best Regards,
Andy
Commodoortje (2016-01-24 17:18:27+00:00): Hoi luapfohkrek,

Kun je hier nog wel bijvoorbeeld met de fiets komen?
Dan kun je overwegen om de weg als highway=path te taggen.
Het paaltje heb je netjes op een node geplaatst.
chillly (2016-01-23 17:45:17+00:00): Hi,
I think you tried to add a fuel station. If so, you need to add some extra info to the node (point) you added. amenity=fuel says it's a fuel station. name=Fuller Fuels Ltd would give it a name. The name is usually what is on the name board. If Fuller fuels is the operator then use operator=Fuller Fuels ltd and add the correct name.

Hope this helps
eggie (2021-08-03 14:12:22+00:00): Ha Jan,
Kun jij even meekijken naar de verrichtingen van deze nieuwe 'mapper'.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109090245#map=18/51.47379/6.04523

en
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109090245

Overigens had ik een revert gedaan, maar ik begrijp van bewoners dat hij z'n wegen liever van de kaarg ziet verdwijnen.  Misschien last dat mensen doorsteken naar die wandelroute? 

In principe haal ik niet zomaar wegen weg behalve als ze echt over het erf zelf lopen.
Had van de driveway overigens wel nog een hghway=track gemaakt. 
Het is jouw bijdrage.  Wellicht heb jij nog suggesties voor medemapper BEmapp?

MVG
eggie
JanWandelaar (2021-08-09 07:02:51+00:00): Deze weg ken ik. Als ik het mij goed herinner is het een weg (het is niet een erf) die door de buren gebruikt worden. Ze willen geen wandelaars e.d. die hier gebruik van maken. Doordat de weg er mooi uit ziet (met bomen erlangs) is het aantrekkelijk om er in te lopen, ondanks een verbodsbord.
eggie (2021-08-09 07:36:52+00:00): Ha  Jan... Tja... daar doe je weinig aan als mensen de bordje negeren. 'k Heb alles in ieder geval op access private gezet.
We gaan het wel zien wat er mee gebeurt.
Ook heeft de toegangsweg in ieder geval geen verbinding met die wandelroute. Het zal niet routeren. Zal in ieder geval de landuse aan het eind laten aansluiten. Dan suggereert het in ieder geval geen doortocht.
MVG
eggie
gorn (2016-04-18 01:10:30+00:00): This changeset contains very obvious mistakes. For example road http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346594433 duplicates alredy existing road in lower quality and is incorrectly tagged as residental (it is clearly not).
adrianojbr (2016-01-23 21:48:44+00:00): olá, rodrigo. removi a ciclovia da rua dos caçadores que você criou, pois já estava criada como ciclofaixa. te mandei uma mensagem sobre esse assunto (ciclofaixa x ciclovia). abraço.
maraf24 (2016-01-24 12:54:28+00:00): Nieprawidłowo przeniosłeś adresy na obrys budynku. Zniknęła nazwa miasta i źródło danych.
Do przenoszenia najlepiej użyć funkcji scalania w edytorze.
luschi (2016-08-08 16:06:37+00:00): Hallo neuli,
deine Änderungen stimmen nicht mit der Wiki überein.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Proposed_features/Relation:enforcement
Falls du dich entscheidest die Fehler zu korrigieren, solltest du pro Relation einen Änderungssatz machen und nicht einen der über die ganze Welt geht.
lg
luschi
PS: Eine Relation habe ich korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5893609
Mar4s (2016-01-26 15:02:31+00:00): Why was multipolygon the following landuse=residential multipolygon deleted?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4749281/history
kiwichickenmusician (2016-05-08 13:03:29+00:00): Probably by mistake, I just start try editing multipolygons...
Mar4s (2016-05-08 20:44:19+00:00): Nevermind, I fixed it already...multipolygons are just tricky to learn, no worries...
wille (2016-01-24 02:54:03+00:00): oi, UsuárioPar

Tudo bem? Parabéns pelo mapeamento que você vem fazendo!

Encontrei algumas coisas que você poderia melhorar:

- Delimitar a cidade inteira como landuse=residential não é recomendável, pois dentro da cidade existem áreas comerciais, industriais, militares, etc...
- natural=wood e landuse=forest são coisas diferentes e não deveriam ser usadas juntas. natural=wood são para florestas nativas. Já landuse=forest são para florestas manejadas, exemplos: plantação de eucalipto.

até mais,
wille
Supaplex (2016-01-24 12:08:53+00:00): 用Google Maps的資料來畫OpenStreetMap不大好，Google Maps有他的版權和使用限制，不允許拿來畫其他地圖
sdoerr (2016-01-23 21:14:49+00:00): Oops! Thanks.
JeSe-MX (2016-02-02 18:47:09+00:00): Recordar que los nombres van en minúscula, sólo mayúscula la primer letra de un nombre propio.
5m4u9 (2016-01-25 01:51:35+00:00): Gracias por añadir/actualizar tanto info al mapa.

Cada dato del mapa es posible utilizarlo desde aplicaciones para celular, tableta como ser OSMAnd, Maps.me, MapFactor, Scout, etc. Y también receptores GPS Garmin.

Sigue añadiendo y mejorando la zona donde vives o trabajas, si tienes dudas de cómo editar, las imagenes aereas desplazadas, como usar en el celular, como añadir otros datos... puedes pasar por el HackLab (mapa-> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2710181931) cualquier sábado de 10 a 13h y vemos ahí.
naoliv (2016-01-23 19:05:19+00:00): Celso, "Minha Residencia" é um nome muito vago e pouco representativo. Imagine se todo mundo colocar um ponto escrito "Minha Residencia" no mapa. Não fará sentido.
Talvez você queira representar as casas do quarteirão que você mora, colocando o número das casas, por exemplo?
maraf24 (2016-01-24 13:00:14+00:00): Usunięta informacja z adresów o:
nazwie miasta, kodzie pocztowym, źródle danych
5m4u9 (2016-01-31 10:29:02+00:00): Gracias por añadir más info al mapa.

Pero este otras ediciones tienen un error, asumiste que los datos están desplazados de la imagen... es un error, es al contrario, la imagen tiene error.

Un vídeo de unos segundos para aprender a corregir este desplazamiento... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8s-pN6gpY7w
Константин Гам (2018-10-25 13:53:24+00:00): Вы уверены что на тропе стоит знак "Движение на велосипеде запрещено"?
GerdP (2016-01-24 08:35:24+00:00): Hi there!
The attribute highway=busway is rarely
used, was it intended ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393032849