piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Wulf4096 (2019-06-05 21:43:41+00:00): Hallo!

Ich bin gerade dabei, sämtliche Ladestationen in Hamburg zu mappen und das auch einigermaßen nach demselben Schema zu tun.

Ich richte mich da grob nach
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
bzw. nach dem was in Hamburg am häufigsten anzutreffen war.

Konkret:
* capacity ist keine elektrische Angabe, sondern die Anzahl der Fahrzeuge, die man gleichzeitig laden kann. Das ist bei Stromnetz Hamburg fast immer "2".
* Die Ladestationen haben keinen "name" sondern ein "ref". Dass das Gerät "Station: 584" heißt steht auch nirgends drauf. Vermutlich sind da zwei Zahlen 5844, 5845 für eine AC-Station, oder drei Zahlen 5841, 5842, 5843 für eine DC/AC-Station. Die wären im Ref gut (Aufsteigend, mit ; getrennt). z. B. "ref=5844;5845".
Ggfs. können noch die verfügbaren Sockets getaggt werden oder die einzelnen Ampere bzw. KiloWatt-Angaben pro Socket. Da hab ich mir bisher aber noch keine Gedanken drüber gemacht, wie man dies am geschicktesten tut.

Beispiel für eine DC/AC-Station mit 3 Referenznummern drauf:
https://osm.org/node/6161977977

Beispiel für eine reine AC-Station mit zwei Referenz-Nummern:
https://osm.org/node/5273693165

Ich hoffe du hast hier keine Daten von https://www.emobility-partner.de/ kopiert, sondern warst vor Ort? Es existiert meines Wissens keine Datenfreigabe.

Laut deinem Changeset hast du Bing benutzt; da kann aber zumindest ich rein gar nichts erkennen. Eine andere Quellenangabe fehlt im Changeset.

Auf den Hamburg-DOP20-Luftbildern sehe ich zwei Flecken, die die Ladestation sein *könnten*; beide sind nicht zwischen den Gebäuden, sondern vor'm linken bzw. vor'm rechten.

Danke! :-)
Mapward (2019-06-06 16:40:03+00:00): - Doch ich entnehme von dort Daten, war aber auch Vorort. Habe geprüft ob sie existiert in OSM. Warum soll man dass nicht nutzen dürfen? Die Nutzen ja auch OSM, diese Experten...

Ja da ist definitiv eine. Sieht man ja auch auf der Website.

Werde die Änderungen einpflegen. Meine Charging Stations in Harburg und Umland müssten dann auch nochmal revidiert werden wohl.
Wulf4096 (2019-06-06 20:51:43+00:00): Bloß weil die OSM als Karten-Hintergrund nutzen, heißt das nicht, dass deren Daten von uns in OSM genutzt werden dürfen.

Oder siehst du irgendwo die Lizenzbestimmung die dies erlaubt? Wenn ja, dann verlink mir die mal bitte!

Positionen sollten auf gar keinen Fall von denen übernommen werden. Die sind vielfach schlichtweg falsch. Spitzenreiter "5594;5595" ist 903m daneben. Insgesamt hab ich zur Zeit 24 Stationen auf meiner Liste, die >20m falsch sind; 6 davon >100m.
Mapward (2019-06-06 21:05:47+00:00): Jo, ich platziere sie händisch +-2m sollte ausreichen zum finden
Mapward (2019-06-07 19:28:03+00:00): Warum verwehrt mir das Wiki uploads?

⧼apierror-permissiondenied⧽
viloan (2019-06-05 20:29:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Wulf4096 (2019-06-05 21:59:37+00:00): Hallo,
bezüglich https://osm.org/note/1795403 :

Danke für's Nachgucken!

Dass die Ladestation eventuell weg sein *könnte* habe ich darauf geschlossen, dass diese bei https://www.emobility-partner.de/ verschwunden ist. Leider weiß ich nicht mehr sicher, welche Station da gelöscht wurde (verflixte IT ^_^). Derzeit ist nur die 0351 eingetragen, aber nicht die 0381.
Die Daten auf der Seite sind nur mäßig zuverlässig, man muss vor Ort alles nachkontrollieren. Manche Ladesäulen fehlen ganz, andere sind auch gerne mal ne Straßenecke daneben plaziert, teilweise auch nen Kilometer daneben.

n.b.: Eine Datenfreigabe gibt's nicht, ließe sich aber vermutlich besorgen. Von daher nutze ich die Seite nur zur Planung von Fahrradtouren und kopiere nichts nach OSM.

Ist's in Ordnung, wenn ich die Ladestation aufteile, weil da ja tatsächlich zwei Stück nebeneinander stehen?
ma-rt-in (2019-06-06 18:29:41+00:00): Hallo,
zu dem Kommentar des fixme in Node 5628650086: Bau  POI ein, es sind ja zwei Säulen und nicht eine.

vg
Map-Peter (2019-06-06 19:52:34+00:00): Hallo Wulf4096 und ma-rt-in, 
ich habe gerade zwei POI daraus gemacht. 
@ Wulf4096: 
Gerne anpassen, ich kenne mich damit nicht im Detail aus und will das auch gar nicht. Für mich ist wichtig, das diese POI überhaupt erst einmal in OSM eingezeichnet sind. 
Bitte sehe meine fixme generell als Aufforderung zur Verbesserung, wenn du dich angesprochen fühlst. 
Gruß Peter
Enock4seth (2019-06-06 02:24:51+00:00): Kindly capitalize the names eg: "Assemblies of God" and alsp put a space between hashtag and comment. eg. "Added buildings #UMaTYouthMappers"
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-06 17:09:42+00:00): #test #failed

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your edits?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-06 17:10:55+00:00): #test #failed

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your edits?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
DUGA (2021-08-20 15:41:55+00:00): Please do not connect any landuse feature with highway.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694820729/history#map=19/39.76381/-76.85434
Autofan (2021-08-20 15:57:20+00:00): Hi DUGA, thanks for your input. What is the reason for that? I do that all the time to prevent landuse intersecting with roads in an unsightly way. Especially in areas with low-res imagery, where I can't draw a more precise boundary than the roads in between a "landuse" area.
DUGA (2021-08-20 17:06:19+00:00): Theoretically road is a continuous area, you intersect road area with land use features could be acceptable. However:

1) OSM community does not favor drawing road as an area. 

2) Intersecting will increase the workload of others when they only wish to cleanup the road but not any other features. And other people have to disconnect the area you attached to the road in order to do the cleanup. Not a big issue at this place, but when there are multiple area features combined (boundaries, woods…), it will become a huge problem.

3) The boundary of the school here is limited exactly at the edge of the road. If you connect the school area onto the road, you accidentally put half of the road area as part of the school parcel, which is basically incorrect.

PS: PA is not an area with low res imagery.
Autofan (2021-08-29 20:25:07+00:00): Thank you DUGA! I'm with you on #2 and #3 and will try to follow your advice in the future.
mariotomo (2019-12-03 15:43:31+00:00): hola.  gracias por añadir información, pero por favor, algún cuidado con los 'warning' que reciben: 
warnings:almost_junction 	1
warnings:crossing_ways 	6
warnings:disconnected_way 	2

cada warning dejado abierto es una tarea para los otros maperos.
mavOsaure (2019-06-06 11:21:26+00:00): Bonjour Fabrice,
mavOsaure (2019-06-06 11:29:12+00:00): Si tu souhaites référencer une entreprise (la tienne?), il faut l'indiquer. Tu n'avais mis qu'un nom à ton point, mais il faut le caractériser. J'ai donc rajouté la clé "office=it" qui devrait convenir.
Le positionnement est-il correct? Tu peux aussi ajouter des coordonnées (tél, mail, site, ... ) en passant par la liste déroulante "ajouter un champ".
Fabrice Cherrier (2019-06-06 16:45:41+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour les infos, en effet c'est la mienne, je découvre car je dois aussi le faire pour un client. J'ai regardé vite fait hier soir, mais je vais consulter la documentation pour ne pas faire d'erreur.
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
TheEditor101 (2019-06-05 21:20:21+00:00): Relation was broken in changeset 70392134.

We should probably stop using the road segment entities as relation members and map the boundary using ways attached to the roads to reduce the likelihood of this breaking again in future.
Phyks (2019-06-06 09:06:26+00:00): Bonjour,

Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694827182, s'agit-il bien d'un chemin d'exploitation, suffisamment large pour permettre le passage d'un véhicule ? Sinon, il devrait probablement s'agir d'un highway=path.

Il est également indiqué comme access=private, y a-t-il bien des panneaux sur le terrain pour l'indiquer ?

Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694827181, il est indiqué comme highway=path (un véhicule ne peut-on donc pas l'emprunter, par contraintes physiques). Pourquoi avoir mis foot=private ? J'aurais probablement plutôt mis access=private si le chemin est bien privé (de sorte que les vélos, chevaux etc soient aussi concernés). Y a-t-il bien un panneau privé sur le terrain ?

Bonne journée,
vilbail (2019-06-06 17:18:46+00:00): Bonjour
D'abord maerci de tes remarques qui me sont bien utiles, je commence seulement à contribuer et je n'ai ceratainement pas tout compris
Pour le premier chemin: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694827182, il s'agit bien d'un highway=track, car un véhicule adapté bien sur, pas une voirure de tourisme peut très bien empreinter ce chemin, ce qui a déjà dû être le cas.
Pourquoi ai-je mis access=private?
Parceceque j'ai trouvé d'un côté une sorte de barrière condammant l'entrée faite de morceaux de bois en travers de l'entrée, et de l'autre côté les restes d'une corde manifestement à l'origine tendue entre deux arbres situés de chaque côté du chemin. Mais pas de panneau disant explicitement qu'il est interdit de pénétrer.
Dans ce cas que faut-il indiquer?

Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694827181, je pense que l'état du chemin ne permet pas facilement à un véhicule de l'empreinter, bien que ça a dû être le cas à une certaine époque.
à l'entrée du chemin, il est indiqué sur des morceaux de bois qui le barre, un panneau "privé" mais de l'autre côté rien, il faut dire qu'il est peu visible.
je pense que tu as raison il faut mettre access=private, désolé mais je ne suis pas vttiste, ni cavalier et je suis resté da
vilbail (2019-06-06 17:21:34+00:00): dans mon univers.
Merci pour tes conseils, j'espère progresser rapidement
Je ne suis pas dûr non plus d'avoir bien raccorder mes chemins.
Bonne soirée
Phyks (2019-06-12 11:14:35+00:00): Ok ! Vu les commentaires en plus et les modifications faites, ça me semble correct en l'état. J'aurais fait pareil en tout cas.

Bonne journée !
vilbail (2019-06-12 12:40:31+00:00): Merci pour ton retour
bonne soirée
Minh Nguyen (2019-08-07 19:38:44+00:00): Thanks for mapping out this preserve! By the way, the OSIP 6in imagery layer is much better aligned and clearer for tracing than Bing.
reportingsjr (2019-08-07 21:49:16+00:00): Thanks for the tip Minh! For what its worth I actually mostly used gps and traced the imagery just a little bit where I didn't get a chance to hike. (here is the trace I used: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/reportingsjr/traces/3007975)
Minh Nguyen (2019-08-23 23:02:52+00:00): Oh that’s even better. By the way, do you know how far this preserve extends? I tried to guess based on any clear property lines I could see from aerial imagery, but I came up quite short compared to the official acreage.
reportingsjr (2019-08-23 23:32:08+00:00): I've looked in the past and unfortunately the Clermont County Auditor only provides scans of paper copies of the land surveys and a map that shows all of the parcels in an area. I can do a rough trace later today of the property you missed (it is across gaynor road, but there are no trails there).
reportingsjr (2019-08-24 02:48:38+00:00): Ok, I expanded the size of long branch farm. Note that there is a separate area to include if you check the total size of the farm.
Minh Nguyen (2019-08-24 19:22:54+00:00): Thanks!
viloan (2019-06-05 21:31:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-06-05 21:32:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-06-06 05:53:25+00:00): Hier is niet alles goed gegaan en zit wel heel veel in de knoop. Ik kijk even of het simpel te herstellen is.
Hier kun je dat zien.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70969153
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-06 06:19:18+00:00): Ik heb de fietspaden / routes uit de knoop gehaald en hersteld. Hoe komt autoverkeer nu in Jeugdland?
eggie (2019-06-06 06:25:11+00:00): Ik heb het Humberpad vanaf de oude kruising op bestemmingsverkeer gezet. Svp Niet nog een keer daar een highway unclassified overheentrekken door een node te verplaatsen, want het hele fietsroutenetwerk komt dan weer mee. 
Het rputeert nu weer,
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-06 05:51:41+00:00): Hier ontbreekt de straatnaam
eggie (2019-06-06 06:38:01+00:00): Is het hier nog wel een highway=unclassified? Hoe komen dan auto's  hier?
ralley (2019-06-24 09:49:25+00:00): You have changed the name to just 'c'
ralley (2019-07-18 00:31:15+00:00): Has been fixed
3kjhd23 (2019-06-05 22:56:24+00:00): *вместо сбера теперь лента, вместо аптеки эдифарм в д. 21 апт. алоэ
eggie (2020-09-28 09:00:55+00:00): Padvinder... Alles weer helaas door elkaar?
Toch kleine moeite om er wat aandacht aan te besteden?
Dit is toch geen werk om met Go map te doen?
MVG,
eggie
nevw (2019-08-26 05:13:16+00:00): Hi
there is no need to delete these driveways and is against how mapping is normally carried out on the OSM.
Just tag as highway=service + service=driveway + access=private
aharvey (2019-09-12 04:35:03+00:00): @ecoeng Please see the discussion over at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html
user_5173844 (2019-06-06 08:16:53+00:00): Hi ACarlotti,

Has this slip road been already moved to the new location or is it still under construction?

You can see its location in the most recent imagery from Maxar. The shape is similar to what you have drawn but not quite the same (the slip road starts earlier and approach to the roundabout is less curved).

In my recent A14 updates (Changesets 70831438, 70831840, 70832054 and 70833013) I aligned roads to imagery, but there were still some roads left where new imagery is not yet available. These may need new estimates.
ACarlotti (2019-06-07 21:32:36+00:00): The opening of the new slip road was announced in https://www.facebook.com/A14C2H/photos/a.238494069903679/693911841028564/. Based on comments and an educated guess, I would expect the temporary slip road to use a bit of the new main carriageway as well, but since I don't yet know how much, I just drew it as leaving the existing carriageway at the latest possible moment to meet the eventual permanent slip road.

This was drawn mostly from what I saw when I visited the sight previously, along with some educated guesses, so anything derived from ariel imagery will be much better. However, with both the new WB carriageway and the first of the two exit slip roads both being constructed to the south of the original A14 route here, I don't think it is possible to deduce the alignment from the Maxar imagery, which is still relatively old at this point. I intend to revisit this area during the next week to get a better look (although I am limited in what I can safely access without a motor vehicle) - I expect combining a site visit with the Maxar imagery will give better results that using either one alone.
Warin61 (2019-06-07 07:43:26+00:00): Hi,
Looks like this has broken the bus route for Ballarat City - Wendouree West relation 2006535. There may be others... 

Do you want to fix this?
Supt_of_Printing (2019-06-07 08:17:15+00:00): Oops, certainly unintentional, but I can't work out where it;s broken. Happy to fix if I know where and how.
Warin61 (2019-06-07 09:03:35+00:00): There are many bus route problems...

Market Street traveling from the west to go north on Armstrong St has to go all the way around the roundabout as there is no direct connection between the two despite there crossing... 
How is Mair Street part of this route? There are 2 ways running across this route .. but the bus runs into to nothing and/or appears from nowhere.. magic!

Many many more. Perhaps Potlatch is not the right tool for this job? I only use JOSM so I don't know. I'm inclined to revert and see what that does.. possibly the bus route was buggered before your change... I am not local so cannot simply 'fix it' from my knowledge, I'd have to go back to where it was in OSM.
Langlaeufer (2020-06-13 19:29:07+00:00): Wieso Motorway=no? Ic
katpatuka (2022-02-09 17:10:21+00:00): merhaba  Abdulkadir, https://osm.org/way/694842828 craft=beekeeper olarak etiketlemişsin - o konuda emin misin? ;)

Sanki sanayi alan gibi geliyor bana...
wireguy (2019-06-06 01:27:12+00:00): comment wrong.  just squaring house.
Glassman (2019-06-08 19:18:30+00:00): I changed your ways to service - they are not in the counties database. Otherwise your edit looks good. I'll send you some info on OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70971708
Warin61 (2019-06-07 07:30:37+00:00): Hi,
Combining mangrove creek into one way has broken  the relationship for the 'wood'... relation 7527445, it used parts of the creek to define the trees edge.  
Would you like to fix that?
nlehuby (2020-01-03 17:32:37+00:00): Est-ce qu'il y a une voie de bus dans les deux sens de circulation sur le Boulevard Botreau Roussel ?

lanes:psv:backward = 1 laisse supposer qu'il a juste une voie dans un sens

mais oneway:bus = no dit le contraire
Oxus (2020-01-03 18:46:06+00:00): Salut nlehuby, J'ai seulement fait des ajustements d'alignement sur cette route, mais je peux peut-être aider avec cette question. 

Je pense que la situation est que c'est une voie à sens unique pour le trafic régulier (voitures), mais les bus sont autorisés dans les deux sens.
 
Ce pourrait être une bonne idée de contacter https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/anebophil d'Abidjan Transport qui a également travaillé sur ces fonctionnalités. 

Bonne cartographie!
anebophil (2020-01-06 15:17:23+00:00): Oui
b-jazz (2019-08-10 00:53:18+00:00): As abbreviations aren't "allowed" in ways, I've changed "S Lafayette St" to "South Lafayette Street".
Carnildo (2019-06-06 19:54:28+00:00): The "residential road" tag you used for the roads you added down by Walla Walla is intended for things like house-lined suburban streets.  A better tag for what you added is "driveway".

(Historically, "residential road" has also been used as the default tag for "you can drive here" features, so it's difficult to learn the proper usage of it from looking at the map.)
Glassman (2019-06-08 19:20:34+00:00): Tip: we don't use descriptive name tags. It should go into the description tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70972007
Glassman (2019-06-08 19:53:35+00:00): I modified the parking aisle to better match the imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70972025
Glassman (2019-06-08 19:34:07+00:00): The best way to tag curb side parking is to add the tag parking:lane=left/right/both to the highway=* feature. I've tried to fix the ones you added.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70972248
Glassman (2019-06-08 20:04:14+00:00): Tips: close out your edit when moving to distant areas to edit. 
Beach tags can be a node, but best when you create a polygon area of the beach. Plus it will render.

Question about the dog run path you added. Does the dog run area connect to nearby streets? Seems like there should be a place to park and walk to the area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70972516
DavidKewley (2019-06-06 05:51:10+00:00): I've reverted this changeset because it appears clearly to make fictional edits.

When making changes to our shared map, please stick with what's real.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-07 00:24:28+00:00): Hi - you've added Olinger Park so that the majority of the mapped area just covers South Main street - is the park the area between South Main and South Columbia?
classicedition (2019-06-07 15:14:54+00:00): It actually starts on the left side of south main by the rite-aid and then if you cross the road, that triangle looking section is also part of the park. Is my edit incorrect? Should I have mapped two separate sections and labelled them both as the same park instead of including the road? If so I apologize and will gladly fix my mistake.
Carnildo (2019-06-08 06:43:15+00:00): I've deleted it -- "Olinger Park" isn't listed on the Milton-Freewater website, nor does the website list a park in that location by any name.  The triangle between Main, Columbia, and Second looks like generic urban green space, not a park, and I didn't see any signs giving it a name in Bing Streetside.