piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-01-08 13:27:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
There are some issues which I want to address. This is a summary . The points are described on attached document.I
A: Inaccurate mapping

C: Collecting multiple buildings

E:Buildings not squared
F:Buildings partly hidden under trees
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
eggie (2021-01-05 18:09:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Alleeen name=...   werkt alleen in combinatie met een andere tag.. Bv office=company   Dan zal de naam pas zichtbaar worden. 
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-05 19:40:18+00:00): Website , phone en company toegevoegd.
Het zal nu straks wel renderen op de kaart
mvg
eggie
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 10:41:49+00:00): Altre segnalazioni: hai inserito in questa highway alcune key che si utilizzano solo nelle route come type=route, network=lwn, cai_scale=E; quando si disegna una highway non si inseriscono le key delle relazioni e qui non serve. Anche tracktype non va messo avendo mappato un path. Per favore correggi.
datendelphin (2021-01-06 16:38:04+00:00): Hallo Chips und willkommen bei OSM 
Ich habe da etwas mühe deine Bearbeitung der geplanten Tangente nachzuvollziehen. Hast du die Situation vor Ort erfasst? Oder dich vor allem am Orthofoto orientiert? z.B. Die Brücke über denGrossenbach, die war im Herbst noch nicht da, als ich das letzte mal dort war. Hat die Linienführung der Südstrasse zur Zugerstasse bereits geändert? 

Grüsse
Michael
404Chips (2021-01-06 20:42:00+00:00): Hallo Michael
Genau, mittlerweile wird die Strasse von der Autobahn zur Zugerstrasse auf der Zuger Seite geführt und Richtung Autobahn auf der Baader Seite der Unterführung der Tangente.

Ich habe es nicht mittels GPS erfasst. Da ich aber aus der Nähe komme, bin ich sehr sicher.
404Chips (2021-01-06 20:42:42+00:00): Der Gruss ging vergessen...

Gruss 404Chips
datendelphin (2021-01-10 15:53:35+00:00): Hallo 404Chips 

Vielen Dank für die schnelle Antwort. Da hat sich ja viel getan in den letzten paar Monaten. Ich war neugierig und bin gestern mal hin gefahren. Tatsächlich sind da zwei neue Brücken aufgetaucht und der Weg scheint nun freigegeben für Fussgänger. Ich habe mir erlaubt, die Geometrie noch etwas zurecht zu schieben nachdem ich vor Ort ein paar Fotos gemacht habe. 
Happy mapping 
Michael
BCNorwich (2021-01-06 08:36:50+00:00): Hi,

 I just wanted to let you know the forest area Way: 76448980 seems to have been inadvertently squared off. If you need help reverting it please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
DMcDowall (2021-01-06 12:29:28+00:00): Hi

Thanks for pointing it out.  I had adjusted the western end to map the buildings that were all mixed up in the landuse forest and the roads but hadn't sorted the rest of the forest that was weirdly square when I started - all sorted now.
BCNorwich (2021-01-06 14:22:09+00:00): Hi,

 I did test revert your first changeset to see what the forest area looked like originally. It was yourself that inadvertently squared the area off. 

I see that rather than reverting the inadvertent changes you've tweaked the area again. May I respectfully point out that the forest area does not extend across the railway, (the railway area is not forested). Further please see that you've now duplicated the forest area north of the railway. I've not changed anything so that you can see what I mean.

Regards Bernard.
woodpeck_repair (2021-03-31 06:45:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 102020319, 102013660, 102017051, 102013098, 102011378, 102025540, 102016336, 102012763, 102015297, 102022908, 102027001, 102011893, 102014416, 102018345, 102009137, 102015795, 102012305, 102030139, 102028531, 102024191, 102013937, 102019227, 102017661, 102014727, 102021580, 102013409, 102014180 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed Kosu77 imports
ChristianA (2021-02-18 14:25:34+00:00): Hej. Använder du satellitdata när du redigerar? Vilken i så fall? Några av dina vägar verkar inte stämma så bra med varken Maxar eller NVDB.

Mvh
jorchr (2021-02-18 19:08:39+00:00): Jag har använt de flygbilder som varit tydligast av de som är tillgängliga i Potlatch 2. Men det kan vara så att jag inte alltid fixar till befintliga vägar med dålig passning i hela sin längd. Har du exempel på vägar som inte stämmer?
ChristianA (2021-02-18 19:29:53+00:00): Jag vet inte hur det funkar riktigt i Potlatch; kan man korrigera flygbilderna? Det behöver man ju ofta göra för de ligger lite fel och felet varierar dessutom. Man får korrigera mot något man litar på, tex ett gäng bra gps-spår, eller något pålitligt dataset. Jag använder Trafikverkets NVDB som är väldigt noggrannt för större vägar.

Att behöva korrigera flygbilderna är lite frustrerande men oftast ett måste för att det ska bli hyfsat rätt positioner på det man ritar av.

Det ser ut som ganska många av de mindre vägarna i ändringssetet ligger en bit fel. Den här har även fel form: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892431563#map=16/58.3835/16.2447

Mvh
jorchr (2021-02-20 11:10:28+00:00): De flygbilder som finns tillgängliga i Potlatch är Bing areal och Esri World, och jag använder oftast Esri World. Det går att justera alignment, men det är sällan det behövs, så det är lätt att missa när så är fallet. I så fall gäller det att det finns bra gps-spår som kan användas, vilket inte alltid är fallet. Trafikverkets data verkar inte fungera i Potlatch. De närmsta månaderna har jag förmodligen inte möjlighet att redigera i någon större omfattning.
BCNorwich (2021-01-06 18:24:03+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It's OSM practice to only map verifiable ground truth. 

Your changeset comment seems to indicate that you are not absolutely sure of the speed limit here so please check before adding a speed limit tag. 

The maxspeed:advisory=* tag is used to map a posted advisory speed limit which is not legally binding. Again you seem to indicate this maxspeed:advisory is your advice, not that which is signed on the road.

The Bing imagery indicates that there are no lanes marked in either direction on this road. Indeed for the most part there isn't even a central white line dividing the carriageway. Lane tagging gets a bit complicated but if there is only one lane the road can't be two way. 

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse (2021-01-24 13:29:35+00:00): What is the source for this name, other that just transliteration?
dx125 (2021-01-06 05:26:55+00:00): Danke für deine Korrektur.
Ich hatte es auch schon bemerkt, aber hier erst noch eine Reaktion abwarten wollen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96923290
Der Verursacher kann eventuell kein Deutsch und ist nicht Willens, ein Übersetzungstool zu nutzen. Na immerhin hat er seine Edits (alle ohne Changeset Kommentar) mit einem Apple Gerät gemacht, da an der "Flüchtlingsunterkunft".
Frans S (2021-01-07 15:24:59+00:00): Hello. thanks for mapping here.
A few remark on your mappings. 
See attached document for explanations of the figures
E: Buildings not squared
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
Allison P (2022-11-02 04:12:32+00:00): Guess I missed West Avenue East (should be West Avenue E). Working on those now.
Nakaner (2021-01-07 08:52:15+00:00): Hallo,

es ist richtig, bei Telefonnummern in OSM die Ländervorwahl mit anzugeben, aber bitte in der Form +49 721 6649040. Könntest du das bitte korrigieren?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97000868
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-18 02:29:27+00:00): هذا التحرير غير صحيح ولا وجود لهذا المكان في الواقع
eggie (2021-01-05 19:31:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review... Hier klopt iets niet.
tracktype=grade2 betekent half verhard. Bv surface=gravel
De tracktype zal dus verandert moeten worden in tracktype=grade3 of 4
Zie wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-05 19:35:36+00:00): De track heb ik aangepast naar tracktype=grade3
Zo zit het ook bij mij in m'n hoofd nog. 
MVG
eggie
thompn (2021-01-05 19:58:22+00:00): I didn't change anything except the surface type.

Nick
eggie (2021-01-05 20:12:05+00:00): Okey Nick.. but tracktype=grade2 was already added  by the former mapper and that is not according surface=sand.
surface=sand is tracktype=grade3 or 4
I know surface = sand is okay here.  
I know the situation by survey. 
So I changed the tracktype=grade2 into grade3

Otherwise 'routers' will use the the wrong tracktype and think this is a gravelroad.
It's okay now.
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=97001044
Greetz,
eggie
thompn (2021-01-06 09:25:46+00:00): Thanks,

I'll be mindful to also check the grade of the surface when changing the surfaces in the future.

nick
eggie (2021-01-06 09:39:04+00:00): Top!
fgouget (2021-02-17 22:13:39+00:00): Bonjour,

Le champ start_date sur l'Église et baptistère Saint-Jean ne contient pas une date valide (C).

Avez-vous l'information pour faire la correction ?

Cordialement,
*Martin* (2021-01-07 12:28:07+00:00): spravny nazov zdroja na ktorom sme sa dohodli ne "Ortofotomozaika SR".
*Martin* (2021-01-07 12:28:15+00:00): s/ne/je
PavolG (2021-01-07 12:46:20+00:00): Takto to dopĺňa JOSM , keď natiahnem zdroj z vrstiev.
*Martin* (2021-01-07 12:46:57+00:00): ok, pozriem to
shoegazer (2021-02-21 22:02:50+00:00): Den Parkplatz gibt es schon einige Zeit nicht mehr. Hier wird ein Seniorenwohnheim gebaut. Das kann man auf aktuellen Satellitenbildern, z.B. bei Google, gut sehen.
Pomfuttge (2021-02-25 20:39:50+00:00): Ah ok. Habe das neue Gebäude jetzt auch hinzugefügt. Bin selber nicht in Zeitz, aber habe versucht, mit den Luftbildern die vorher ziemlich dürftige Karte zu erweitern.
Flynn Marquardt (2021-01-12 09:51:01+00:00): The new relation 12138755 is not a valid multipolygon, it contains only one point. You can check this in JOSM with the validator.

What is the purpose of this relation, it does not contain any new information compared to the node?
Enock4seth (2021-08-17 08:29:33+00:00): @Mark Kindly represent only one feature with one element, instead of tagging both building and node as same feature. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Please also avoid using links to commercial / copyrighted images. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:image
eggie (2021-01-05 20:01:38+00:00): Oke.. Je bedoeling is goed, maar het is wat gecompliceerd.
Je zegt het is een fietsstraat geworden met voor auto's alleen bestemmingsverkeer?
Dus niet voor willekeurig asutoverkeer.
Er staat dus geen bord fietspad meer, maar een bord fietstraat?

access=no is verboden toegang voor iedereen. Dat kan niet kloppen. 
De tags zouden moeten zijn tot de oprit naar Wilhelminasingel

Volgens de planning
highway=residential
cyclestreet=yes
traffic_sign=NL:L51
moped=yes
mofa=yes
motor_vehicle=destination
name=Puylegats  

(en niet Fietsstraat)
Verder niets..

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-01-05 20:14:32+00:00): Blijft het feit dat in het plan geen verbinding is van de Wilhelminasingel naar de fietsstraat. 
Ik kan wat voor je aanpassen en dan kun je het bekijken. Nu is het in ieder geval allemaal niet correct.
eggie
eggie (2021-01-05 20:40:01+00:00): type NL:L51b
eggie (2021-01-05 20:40:28+00:00): Ik pas even wat aan
mariotomo (2022-06-07 13:26:28+00:00): hi there. "review requested". by removing the value for "shop", you have hereby broken the object at node 7549867071. it is now not clear what this is. 
apart from this particular case, osmose signals several incomplete objects on your name in your area, I'm sure you wish to review them. (osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=12&lat=8.1146&lon=-80.9408&item=2110&level=1%2C2)
happy mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97001965
mariotomo (2022-09-03 23:11:09+00:00): maybe i'll fix/undo some of these mistakes, i had hoped you'd be interested in improving your mapping.
johsin18 (2021-01-05 20:39:38+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Du darfst gern den Firmensitz eintragen.  Allerdings hast du (wohl versehentlich) ein paar andere Sachen stark verschoben, sodass ich die Änderung rückgängig machen musste:
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=97001970
bxl-forever (2021-04-28 23:37:08+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for this.
You might be interested to learn about this: If a shop closes, only remove what relates to the shop itself—name, opening hours, website and so on—but leave the node on the map, do not delete it.  This is because we need to preserve the rest of the information (building number, relations) and above all the history of the node.
eggie (2021-01-05 20:17:45+00:00): Ik heb niets gecorrigeerd nog. Ik kan dat overigens wel doen.

Een fietsstraat heeft niets met een fietspad te maken. 
Het is dus gewoon een highway=residential
eggie (2021-01-05 20:52:10+00:00): Reinier.. Ik heb het aangepast naar fietstraat
highway=residential
cyclestraat=yes
en nog wat tags. 

De naam heb ik even veranderd in Wilhelminasingel volgens de adressen in de kadasterdata ipv Fietsstraat. 
Wellicht heet het toch nog Puylegats? 

Je moet maar eens kijken.
Het routeerde anders niet. 
access=no is bijna altijd fout. Ook zaten de wegdelen niet aan elkaar. 
Nu is het denk ik correct.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-05 21:06:00+00:00): Zie ook https://i.imgur.com/TEBffQD.jpeg
francians (2021-02-02 20:37:34+00:00): Ho fatto fatto revert di questa modifica e le altre collegate. OSM non è il posto giusto dove inserire questo tipo di informazioni. Ti prego di contribuire con dati reali o usare un altro servizio per il softair. Non ho segnato il tuo account perché voglio credere che siano errori in buona fede.
Se vuoi altre info o chiarimenti scrivimi pure
Francesco
opendcc (2021-01-05 22:28:47+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Wir bilden ab, was auf der Erde zu finden ist. Private Sachen werden als 'privat' gekennzeichnet, nicht gelöscht. Auch z.B. Feuerwehren benutzen unsere Daten und im Brandfall kann die Kenntnis eines Weges helfen - auch eines privaten Weges. 

Viele Grüße
opendcc (2021-01-05 22:30:34+00:00): Ergänzend: da sind auch an der PAN12 ein paar Fehler reingebaut worden. Was war denn das Ziel des Edits?
Frans S (2021-01-06 10:03:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
E. squaring of buildings.
You missed also a few buildings partial hidden under trees 
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97003001
mappip (2021-01-06 17:00:49+00:00): Hi, thank you for your feedback, I have gone back to review the building capture section and am confident with building squaring now :) 
I do have one question that I can't seem to find an answer for, I wonder if you could help. Are we supposed to be identifying buildings of all sizes or is there a minimum requirement. I have noticed in some areas smaller building have not been captured. Maybe these are less permanent like sheds or do they not meet another specific criteria?

Thanks for your help
Frans S (2021-01-07 11:01:01+00:00): Hello.  My answer is probably to long. I send it through the OSM messaging system
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97003001
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-05 20:14:24+00:00): więcej info w https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2485382
zzptichka (2021-01-07 00:27:29+00:00): Hi,
Good job on mapping the golf course. Love your attention to details.
One thing though, "highway=service" should not be mapped as an area. It will break a lot of maps and routing engines. 
Just mapping it as a "highway=path" way with "golf_cart=designated" tag is the most common practice. You can also add "width" and "surface=fine_gravel" tags.  

Here's golf mapping wiki (in case you haven't seen it): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
priscila açai (2021-01-07 01:42:52+00:00): açai maceno
aachso (2021-05-21 12:31:09+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier eine Node ohne Tags erstellt. Vielleicht Tags vergessen oder verklickt?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8294673397
hesdrib (2021-05-21 13:05:27+00:00): zu löschen
aachso (2021-05-21 17:20:09+00:00): Merci, j'ai supprimé le nœud.
Frans S (2021-01-06 09:29:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped. Just 1 remark. You mapped 1 L shaped building where the dark part seems to be a courtyard to me.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97004025
20180911 (2021-01-05 22:18:03+00:00): access=destination ist hier genau der richtige Tag. Wer Kunde ist, hat hier das Ziel und darf daher als Anlieger reinfahren. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Ddestination

Ist unten die Brücke auch nur für Anlieger? Dürfen eventuell Radfahrer die Wege als Durchgang benutzen?
seewäldler (2021-01-06 15:13:22+00:00): Wenn ich mich recht erinnere ist vom Süden her kommend über die Rohrbachbrücke keinerlei Beschilderung, ich passe das mächste Mal aber genau auf was da so steht.
Mäpper (2021-01-06 22:35:25+00:00): Ich meine, dass gerade die Brücke das Schild hat. Auf den Rest habe ich eingetlich von der Brücke her geschlossen. Die Brücke süd-östlich ist offen für die Allgemeinheit.
eggie (2021-01-06 12:27:17+00:00): Dag AnenJan...  De access=no tagging heb ik hier allemaal verwijderd.
Die zijn niet in overeenstemming met de accesstags op de rest van het pad waar alles op yes staat.
Wat heb je hier geconstateerd?
Dat er een slingerhekje staat?
En waarom dan al die verboden erop?
Graag reactie

MVG,
eggie
20180911 (2021-01-05 21:52:17+00:00): I think this is more a leisure=playground. For mapping specific playground objects (they are not often mapped) this site could be helpful: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
Korgi1 (2021-01-08 00:36:02+00:00): god damnit not again
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 10:35:11+00:00): Ciao ho visto che stai mappando alcuni percorsi CAI in questa zona. Forse mi sbaglio ma penso tu sia uno dei partecipanti al corso CAI che si sta tenendo in questio giorni. Ti segnalo alcune imprecisioni nelle key utilizzate (fai riferimento a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI) Nella route che hai creato "CAI 624" il name non va messo (il name si mette solo se esiste ad es. Sentiero Frassati); in from non serve scrivere Sora è sufficiente  Convento dei Passionisti se è stato mappato; il rwn:name non è corretto va messo "Rete Escurionistica del Lazio (RCL)" (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/REI#Esempi_codifica_relazioni); symbol lo si inserisce solo se il percorso è interamente segnato.
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 10:45:02+00:00): Nei log risulta che hai cancellato anche alcune key relative alle mtb, credo vadano ripristinate.
jmapb (2021-01-06 02:37:21+00:00): I'm guessing this is a playground associated with PS 41. You could map it as leisure=playground. Sometimes school-adjacent playgrounds are open to the public, but I don't think this one is, so it would be good to add access=private and maybe draw in the fence.
Polarbear-repair (2021-01-05 22:09:48+00:00): Reverted CSs:
96896509 96893639 96893057 96892414 96892335 96892187 96892138 96891996 96890281 96889803 96888722 96888622 96886321 96885904 96885723 96885140 96884131 96884050 96883897 96883385 96883181 96882449 96875206 96872688 96872493 96870871
phannam (2021-01-06 07:25:50+00:00): i want to change my area, you don't need fix it. I will check carefully when upload
phannam (2021-01-06 07:26:57+00:00): Thank you, i only need to change my university in Viet Nam
Polarbear-repair (2021-01-06 16:33:51+00:00): Hi namprati, 
it is fine to make your local edits. 
 
For the older edits, a full rollback was necessary, since you had accidentally moved objects from Norway and worked further with them in Hanoi. However, these objects went missing in Norway. 

Anyway, in your new edits there are again changes that affect the world. I will check them later.
BCNorwich (2021-01-07 11:29:33+00:00): Hi, I just wanted to let you know that residential area Way: 892436777 has been inadvertently squared off.

Regards Bernard.
dudone (2021-01-07 19:53:22+00:00): Many thanks for letting me know.  I have now fixed it.

Regards

Dudley
gscscnd (2021-01-06 09:13:12+00:00): dr → doktora
Olga | Yanosik (2021-01-06 09:33:57+00:00): ok, ok, poprawione :)
woodpeck_repair (2021-03-31 06:45:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 102020319, 102013660, 102017051, 102013098, 102011378, 102025540, 102016336, 102012763, 102015297, 102022908, 102027001, 102011893, 102014416, 102018345, 102009137, 102015795, 102012305, 102030139, 102028531, 102024191, 102013937, 102019227, 102017661, 102014727, 102021580, 102013409, 102014180 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed Kosu77 imports
CodyNZL (2021-01-14 09:32:51+00:00): Why?
CodyNZL (2021-01-14 09:35:14+00:00): These are - by legal definition, name & visual observation - basins.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-01-05 21:42:29+00:00): Hallo AnenJan. Opmerkingen zoals deze zijn handig om als bron (source) te noteren in je changeset, maar voor de comment is het handiger om aan te geven wat je inhoudelijk hebt aangepast/toegevoegd.
Frans S (2021-01-06 09:10:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97006336
Map-Peter (2021-01-05 23:13:00+00:00): Hallo Gruni587, 
 
du hast ja eine sehr lange OSM-Pause eingelegt. 
Willkommen zurück! 
 
Bevor du nächstes Mal ein OSM-Objekt einfach entfernst, das in Realität nicht mehr existiert, prüfe bitte zuerst ob du es entsprechend dem Lifecycleprefix ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix ) umtaggen kannst. Danke 
 
siehe z.B.: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/783423838/history 
oder 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2509824471/history 
oder 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883565217 
 
Gruß Peter
olo81 (2021-01-10 16:26:46+00:00): Czy to oficjalne nazwy parków? Czy w ogóle to jest park?
C2oc4 (2021-01-11 07:55:55+00:00): Dzień dobry. Pytałem kilku mieszkańców Będzina - Syberki i tak mi powiedzieli. na 100% Park Dolna Syberka jest obok "nerki"
olo81 (2021-01-11 08:04:11+00:00):  Czyli to nie są oficjalne nazwy. Potocznie mówi się Park na dolnej Syberce, wsazując gdzie leży. Nie jest to nazwa. 
Parku "górna Syberka" i nazwany przez pana "Park Syberka" nie  udało mi się znaleźć na stronach urzędu miasta. Prawdopodobnie nie są nawet parkami. Jeśli nie ma żadnych źródeł do których można się odwołać co do tych "parków" to do usunięcia.
DUGA (2021-05-30 14:25:58+00:00): You should not add the parking lot directly to a building. It makes 0 sense.
Frans S (2021-01-06 11:33:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please be more accurate in your mapping and map each building individually
Best regards 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing