piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
TheSwavu (2017-07-06 03:08:34+00:00): This:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5261942

is not the Barossa Valley it's the Barossa Valley Character Preservation District which is something different.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Øukasz (2017-07-31 23:14:41+00:00): hello falah

what is this please?
Robert Whittaker (2017-01-05 13:44:47+00:00): Is the node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4587558092 in the correct location? (I've just added some buildings and roads for Apperley Court from arial imagery. Should be node be within the building?)

You also appear to have changed the address of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3678978022/history to one that isn't correct for that location. Is DeBe Lasers no longer at the St. Francis Way site? If so, do you know what is there instead now?
debelasers (2017-01-05 13:53:35+00:00): Hi Robert, Yes the node should be in one of the buildings but I couldn't place it correctly on the first go and then couldn't work out how to move it. We are in the north east corner of Appley Court, directly facing the access road.
And yes we moved from St Francis Way in November so I was trying to delete that and replace it with the Unit 3 Appley Court address. Unit 5D St Francis Court is urrently having a lot of building work done and should open in February as Kirby's Gym.
debelasers (2017-01-05 13:54:57+00:00): Also, Electronics shop is a poor description of what we do (we design industrial lasers) but it was the closest I could find
trigpoint (2017-01-06 15:19:38+00:00): Shop is probably the wrong description, made_made=works, product=industrial_lasers would fit better I think.
You will need to use a proper computer based editor, such as iD, rather than maps.me as it only allows a very limited subset of pre-defined tags to be used.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
naoliv (2017-01-16 12:13:48+00:00): Renan, isso é uma pista mesmo? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463502558
Possui apenas 132 metros de comprimento?
RenanKrause (2017-01-16 12:16:38+00:00): Ola sim e uma pista de aeromodeliso e pouso de ultra leves
naoliv (2017-01-16 12:35:46+00:00): Beleza.
Vou ajustá-la então (no mapa ela está representada com quase 160 metros).
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:21:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
sq7obj (2017-01-07 16:08:00+00:00): Zmieniając tagi linii https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427394684 usunąłeś informacje o drodze dla rowerów. Uważaj proszę.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 07:26:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Can you add the key religion and denomination (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion), please.
oba510 (2017-01-04 10:05:02+00:00): This block of Eureka was one-way southbound a couple of months ago.  Has it changed?
jacklyn1 (2017-01-04 18:12:08+00:00): Ah, I just checked again, I missed it based on the zoom with Google Maps, the part above Market St is still a one way.
Mike Baggaley (2017-01-10 17:32:39+00:00): Hi, you have recently set way 144233963 and adjoining way to be access=no, bus=yes. This combination means pedestrians have no access. Is that what you intended, or would you be better using motor_vehicle=no and bicycle=no instead of access=no?

Cheers,
Mike
Gyrwa (2017-01-10 19:10:37+00:00): It was intended, I mapped the parallel footway/cycleway as seperate ways. I will look into the consensus on this to see if the ways around the station need redoing.
Mike Baggaley (2017-01-10 19:41:55+00:00): I think that unless there is a sign saying no pedestrians, the way should allow pedestrian access. It is normally perfectly legal (though possibly inadvisable) to walk along the road, even if there is an adjacent pavement. If road only data is being extracted from the OSM database, this will prohibit pedestrian access if there is no foot=yes accompanying access=no.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 07:31:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
mueschel (2017-01-04 13:03:41+00:00): Hi,
you created 73 objects with only foreign tags. Could you correct this?
E.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463512916

Cheers, Jan
geow (2017-01-04 18:13:20+00:00): Hi Giomieres and a warm welcome to OpenStreetMap. It appears that you've imported a significant number of hydrographic features (488 ways with 7244 nodes). 

1. As mentioned above by "mueschel" you haven't used the the proper tags for waterways, which are defined in our wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway

2. Imports from external data sources should only be carried out by those with experience and understanding of the way the OpenStreetMap community creates maps, and only with careful planning and consultation with the local community.

Did you follow the guidelines and was this import discussed anywhere in advance?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

3. We are only allowed to use "free" data which is compliant to our OpenStreetMap license http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap_License

A variety of potential data sources are listed under http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_Datasources

What does SEAM mean and are we allowed to use their data?

Thanks
geow
Alouette955 (2017-01-12 21:32:35+00:00): De multiples fusions de chemins ont étendu la route verte (et d'autres relations) sur des portions où ils ne passent pas entre Richmond et Bromptonville. Voir http://osm.org/go/cKDwF2p--?layers=C
Martin868 (2017-01-13 13:57:17+00:00): tu as raison. j'ai nettoyé et corrigé le tracé de chemins qui étaient morcelé et pas précis, mais j'ai pas bien fait attention aux relations. je viens de faire quelques corrections. Je vais revoir ça plus tard.
Pavel47 (2017-01-15 16:04:09+00:00): С какой целью Вы заменили phone на contact:phone, который используется на порядок реже? Есть ли у этого какая-то практическая цель?
Pavel47 (2017-01-15 16:10:34+00:00): И верните, пожалуйста, значения name. Текущим вариантом Вы мало того, что нарушили правило "Name is the name only", так еще и сами названия отделений удалили.
Avlaak (2017-01-15 17:39:47+00:00): теги phone и contact:phone равнозначны, и я бы не говорил, что на порядок реже, 42779 против 21560, а вообще в регионах по разному, по поводу названий, вы имеете ввиду что отделение потеряло уникальность когда стало, например не "Санкт-Петербург 	195197", а "Отделение связи №195197", при том что по городу половина и так уже было с названием "Отделение связи №...".
Avlaak (2017-01-15 17:45:09+00:00): ну вообще, можно откатить весь пакет, в общем жду ответа
Avlaak (2017-01-15 17:50:28+00:00): ещё по поводу телефонов, у части отделений вообще не было этого тега, где-то в неправильном формате, так что делал везде как привык с contact:phone
Pavel47 (2017-01-15 21:22:24+00:00): Откуда цифры? На Taginfo 833к против 170к соответственно.
Ставить префикс есть смысл, когда название тега может восприниматься неоднозначно. Разве у phone другое значение? Лишние символы, более сложный код для работы с данными - ради чего?
То, что было - это устаревшая инфа+штамповка под некорректный валидатор. Сегодня почтовые отделения носят названия вида "НП XXXXXX", гляньте на таблички у входов хотя бы.
Все, что было с названием типа "Санкт-Петербург #", проще откатить - телефоны там мной уже были проставлены. В остальных контактную информацию лучше, конечно, сохранить.
Avlaak (2017-01-16 12:48:34+00:00): всё поправил, пакет 45214858, статистику по тегам брал по России тут http://osm.sbin.ru/stat/ru/latest/
Pavel47 (2017-01-16 12:57:08+00:00): Спасибо. А еще по поводу телефонов - я специально брал только первый. Ибо схема тегирования при наличии более одного телефонного номера у нас в принципе отсутствует. Правильной обработки варианта через точку с запятой в приложениях или рендерах я не припоминаю(
Avlaak (2017-01-16 13:05:37+00:00): в руководстве новичкам, вроде, написано, что можно указывать несколько номеров через точку с запятой, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0_1.3.2
saintam1 (2017-01-04 21:04:12+00:00): Hello,

You marked a number of paths as pedestrian streets, but I believe this is incorrect. Vitoshka is a pedestrian street. But these are not streets, these are footpaths in the woods.

Wouldn't you agree?
pitagorid (2017-01-06 08:11:07+00:00): Съгласен съм. Всъщност не се касае за улици, а за пешеходни алеи. може би правите разлика, между пешеходна улица, пешеходна алея и пешеходна пътека. Всичко дойде от тага осветление. Дали трябва да се поставя или не. Отначало мислех, че визуализатора OSMAND, изобразява по различен начин теди три вида пешеходни трасета, но се оказа, че виновникът е осветлението. Вече отговорих на този коментар на друго място. Приемете отново моите извинения. С поздрав инж.Иван Иванов
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:42:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388315 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44881854 with invalid footways
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:42:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388312 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882020 with invalid footways
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:42:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388308 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882168 with invalid footways
Arma IRM-ED (2020-11-03 00:39:07+00:00): Hi, I have adjusted the tertiary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/463518713) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:42:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388306 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882236 with invalid footways
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:41:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388305 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882308 with invalid footways
saintam1 (2017-01-04 20:57:04+00:00): Hello,

Why are you removing the lit=yes/no tag everywhere? I checked all of these in person not long ago. Why delete the information?
pitagorid (2017-01-06 07:59:56+00:00): Здравейте,
Знаете ли. Този таг е от несъществено значение и по моя преценка е излишен. По принцип ако го има то трябва да се поставя навсякъде, но вие например сте ги поставяли избирателно. Но което е дразнещото, че някои визуализатори, например навигатора OSMAND, изобразява този таг с дебели жълти или червени линии, които затрудняват разчитането на информацията. Затова си позволих да премахна този таг, който е особено фрапиращ за нашата столица и не съм го виждал никъде другаде, дори в други големи столици. Ако считате че с нещо съм навредил на вашите виждания, моля за извинение. с Приятелски поздрави. инж. Иван Иванов
saintam1 (2017-01-07 21:20:42+00:00): Здравейте, инж. Иванов,

Не съм съгласен с това, което казвате.

С абсолютна сигурност тагът "lit" не е незначителен, нито излишен, а и не се използва само в София. Има си уики страница: ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lit ); 2 милиона обекта използват този таг ( http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=lit ), из целия свят( http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=lit#map ).

Тази информация е от изключително значение в паркове: например софтуери за навигация могат да го използват и да не пращат пешеходци и колоездачи по неосветени алеи през нощта. Вярно е, че този таг в момента не съществува на всички места, но това е още в процес на работа (подобно на целия проект ОСМ). Целта е разбира се тагът да се добави навсякъде, където е релевантен. Аз лично обикалях из парковете в София и си водих бележки кои места са осветени, кои не, така че сега изтрихте часове работа!

Разбирам, че използвате визуализатора OsmAnd. Струва ми се, проблемът се дължи не на таговете, а на самия визуализатор. Ако информацията не се визуализира хубаво, това в никакъв случай не означава да се трие вярна и полезна информация. Това, което правите, е tagging for the renderer.

Ако искате, може Вие да възстановите информацията, но съм съгласен аз да го направя. 

Поздрави,
saintam1
pitagorid (2017-01-08 16:31:03+00:00): Здравейте!
Още веднъж се извинявам за стореното.Наистина, може би трябваше предварително да се консултирам с Вас по този въпрос, но стореното сторено. Проблемът не е фатален. Не бих могъл да възстановя информацията точно както беше. Така че ако много държите на нея възстановете я. Въпреки всичко, моето виждане по този въпрос е колебливо. Например в градинката между софийския университет и народното сърание бяхте сложили таг че осветление липсва. По-добре сложете таг там където има осветление. Но това вие преценете. 
Отново приемете моите извинения.
saintam1 (2017-01-09 23:47:08+00:00): Привет, инж. Иванов,

Благодаря за съобщението. Аз нямам нищо против да възстановя информацията, няма да отнеме много време.

Добре сте дошли в българския форум, където може да обсъждаме различните опции за тагиране: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=57

Приятелски поздрави
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:41:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388303 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882430 with invalid footways
FTA (2017-01-06 04:41:26+00:00): Hi, was there a specific reason you added the banner_url tag? I'm having a difficult time understanding what it represents...the link key given seems to redirect to a travel agency ticket site that is advertising.
Thanks and Happy Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA

Hola, hay alguna razón específica para agregar la etiqueta banner_url? Estoy teniendo un tiempo difícil entender lo que representa...la clave de enlace dada parece redireccionar a un sitio de boleto de agencia de viajes que es la publicidad.
Gracias y feliz cartografía,
Ethan aka FTA
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:41:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388301 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882541 with invalid footways
user_5359 (2017-01-04 08:36:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:41:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388298 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882618 with invalid footways
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:41:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388294 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882704 with invalid footways
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:41:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388288 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882770 with invalid footways
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388284 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44882792 with invalid footways
HubMiner (2019-04-29 04:41:43+00:00): Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/411532/history
Version 12->13, river became industrial area.
dcapillae_old (2017-01-04 12:03:38+00:00): ¡Hola, bravocuatrouno!

He traducido este artículo del wiki por si quieres emplear la etiqueta de puerto de montaña en esta ubicación: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:mountain_pass

Sería conveniente que al menos añadieses una etiqueta adicional además del nombre. Así quedará claro para otros mapeadores a qué elemento sobre el terreno corresponde dicho nombre.

Otra clave aconsejable para utilizar en estos casos es "source" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:source). Sirve para indicar la fuente original de donde proviene la información: mapas del IGN, conocimiento local, Catastro, página web, etc.
geohacker (2017-01-23 07:41:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388281 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44883117 with invalid footways
chillly (2017-01-03 22:00:16+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM

You have added a point for the Travelodge, thanks. 

There are two main ways get added. The simple way is a single point. Descriptive tags then describe what the object is. The more elaborate way is to draw the outline of the building and add the tags to that. Someone had already added the building with the tags for the Travelodge, so your edit duplicates that.

I hope you can add some more stuff, we always need local knowledge to improve te map for everyone.
Endres Pelka (2017-01-04 12:25:54+00:00): What's this featureless area=yes (way 463524755) for?
oba510 (2017-01-04 11:26:47+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!  I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but you accidentally moved a bus stop from Market St to the middle of the Federal Reserve.  I have moved it back to it's real location.
jacklyn1 (2017-01-04 18:12:54+00:00): Sorry about that! Yesterday was my first time using OSM, not sure how that happened but thank you for moving it back!
Constable (2018-02-19 09:06:10+00:00): hi there Steve, is this one actually a park?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344343849
Stahlmann (2017-10-10 13:11:45+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

ich stolpere immer wieder über dieses Changeset in Dassensen. In einer Diskussion mit einem weiteren Mapper sind wir darin übereingekommen, dass

- leisure:garden grundsätzlich an dieser Stelle okay ist. (vgl.: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden),
- aber die Art und Weise der Anwendung falsch ist. Das Tag sollte im Falle entweder wieder
-gelöscht, da quasi alles Garten ist, werden. Auch die Fläche auf der die Häuser stehen. Darüber hinaus ist leisure:garden im Grunde flächendeckend auf die die residential-Fläche angewendet worden.
- oder aber präziser getaggt werden. So, dass sowohl Wohngebäude (o. Ä.) als auch Grundstückseinfahrten ausgespart sind.
Dies impliziert, dass alle Gärten separat getaggt werden.

LG Stahlmann
NGL-engel (2017-10-12 18:34:05+00:00): Hallo Stahlmann 
  grundsätzlich bin ich auch eher ein Erbsenzähler. Aber, na ja, Dein Vorschlag scheint mir wenig praktikabel. Würdest Du in einem öffentlichen Park ebenfalls die Wege mit rausnehmen? 
Aber falls ihr mit meinen (schönen :-) Gärten nicht leben könnt - dann löscht sie halt. Es wird mich nicht umbringen. 
Ich finde es nur Schade, da in in dem Dorf neben den Haus-Gärten auch noch kleine Ackerfächen bzw. Wiesen sind, und diese dann nicht mehr voneinander unterscheidbar wären.
Gruß NGL-engel
Stahlmann (2017-10-16 09:19:05+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
inwiefern erscheint das wenig praktikabel? Jedes Grundstück hat sein eigenen Garten. Und das sollte in der Datenbank auch so hinterlegt sein. Die Dassenser teilen sich ja nicht einen Garten je Straße.

Inwieweit hat das mit Wegen in einem öffentlichen Park zu tun?

Es hat ja niemand was gegen die (schönen) Gärten. Die Acker (eher weniger) und Weideflächen in Dassensen sind mir bekannt. Inwieweit sollen diese unterscheidbar sein? Steht doch eindeutig in den TAGs der Areas drin, was wie gerendert werden soll.

LG Stahlmann
dcapillae_old (2017-01-04 12:22:32+00:00): ¡Hola, bravocuatrouno!
He trazado los restos en planta del antiguo edificio de "Los Caserones" (en ruinas) según los datos del Catastro. Si deseas añadir cualquier edificio en ruinas, puedes trazarlo en planta usando las imágenes del PNOA (u otra fuente) y añadirle la etiqueta "building=ruins" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building%3Druins) junto a la etiqueta "name" para el nombre.
mmd (2017-07-16 19:49:26+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82302312 -> fehlt da ein highway=track?
FahRadler (2017-07-28 13:30:10+00:00): Jo,
habs gefixt.
Danje
hafoe (2017-01-04 12:17:29+00:00): hallo- ein teil des weges ist reiner trampelpfad, der nicht getaggt werden sollte- diese wege befinden sich auf dem schulgrundstück- es besteht nur wegerecht
hafoe (2017-01-04 18:35:55+00:00): korrigiert und vervollständigt - treppen
user_5359 (2017-01-04 08:43:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a fire station? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station.
Gh0stz0x (2017-01-03 23:42:48+00:00): Ora non ho sottomano un PC. Ma perché hai cancellato una way? Se non è per uso pubblico esiste il tag access. Leggiti il wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access
Procedi tu al revert o devo procedere io? Fammi sapere che tipo di access è. Grazie! :-)
Gh0stz0x (2017-01-03 23:45:23+00:00): Dimenticavo, se hai bisogno di una mano contattami. Ricorda che per qualsiasi cosa o quasi esiste un tag, e la nostra guida ai tag è il wiki e la ml.
Thedillis (2017-01-04 10:13:16+00:00): Quando il nostro team ha costruito questo percorso abbiamo chiesto a tutti di non pubblicare il percorso GPS su internet.
Abbiamo un grosso problema con le moto di distruggere i nostri sentieri, che provoca molto lavoro di riparazione.
Le moto trovano i sentieri su questo sito.
Tutti sono liberi di utilizzare questo percorso, si prega di rispettare la nostra decisione e non pubblicare la traccia sui siti web. grazie
Gh0stz0x (2017-01-04 19:47:19+00:00): Mi scusi, ma questo sentiero è su terreno privato?? A che titolo impedite di tracciare il sentiero?? Avete messo il cartello di divieto di transito ai mezzi a motore?? Se si, c' è il tag che vieta l' uso alle moto. Pertanto mi sembra bizzarro mettersi al pari di chi passa con le moto a distruggere il vostro lavoro, cancellando il lavoro altrui su OSM... Aspetto risposte. Grazie.
Gh0stz0x (2017-01-05 20:40:36+00:00): Se non riceverò risposte esaustive, effettuerò segnalazione in ml. Se in mailing list si deciderà per il revert, ripristinerò il sentiero, diffidando qualsiasi persona a cancellarlo. In caso contrario ri segnaleró in ml e si valuterà la segnalazione al DWG.
Grazie. :-)
Thedillis (2017-01-05 23:02:25+00:00): Ciao Andreas, forse non ha capito appieno il nostro primo messaggio.
Gli appassionati di mountain bike locali e il team che costruiscono i sentieri nella nostra zona, che ti piace e utilizzare, si hanno chiesto e tutti gli altri di non pubblicare i nostri sentieri sui siti web pubblici. È una richiesta molto semplice.
Abbiamo perso molti sentieri attraverso moto, e non vogliono perdere più dei nostri sentieri che abbiamo lavorato duramente per creare e costruire insieme.
 
Si prega di non lavorare contro di noi per proteggere i nostri sentieri locali.

Tutti sono invitati a utilizzare i nostri sentieri per andare in bicicletta, e chiediamo a tutti di rispettare i locali della Garfagnana e loro desideri.
Se non si è sicuri, chiedere la gente del posto prima della pubblicazione di altri popoli sentieri sui siti web pubblici.