piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-16 16:42:25+00:00): As a business developer one of the reasons we use this map is to help promote business. If it’s not visible on a map their efforts to be known to the community is muted. I will replace the trees and add more where i fudge tree not tagged. Thanks and sorry for tripping into this thriving community. I mean only good. 😊
SomeoneElse (2022-05-11 19:59:14+00:00): For the avoidance of doubt, "because it clutters the map" is not a good reason to delete trees :)
- Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
kguenther24 (2022-04-18 06:40:22+00:00): Hi, The houses near Roosevelt Middle School aren't all identical so they should either be mapped as reality or not at all. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119730272
stevea (2022-04-22 20:22:08+00:00): Really nice work here!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Frans S (2022-04-28 15:48:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Please map in according with the instructions and use the correct taggings.  You tagged Buildings as a waterbody. The blue/gray rectangular bodies with a shadow next to them are buildings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119730673
Frans S (2022-04-28 15:31:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
You mapped a building covering multiple buildings and added a layer =1 to it.
Please refresh your knowledge about how to map please.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119730746
Frans S (2022-04-28 15:43:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
you mapped a part consisting of multiple buildings as 1 building and added a layer=1 to it. Why? A layer 1 means that is is above other objects or groundlevel, like a bridge . You must have seen the issues on the issue triangle of iDeditor. They must be solved before uploading your work.
You changed also the tag of residential into service. I corrected that. Road mapping is no part of this project.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119730746
Frans S (2022-04-28 12:05:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)

D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.

Please change to and use the Maxar P imagery, See the instructions on the project.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119730875
Frans S (2022-04-28 10:59:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
THis is a buildings only project. Please concentrate to map buildings only.
You overlooked the buildings. 
Maxar Premium is the required Imagery, You mapped from the BIng imagery. Please change that in next mappings

I remove the unwanted mappings because they are not matching with the Maxar imagery and not required and caused a number of issues.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119730892
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
rivermont (2022-04-18 02:15:31+00:00): Please revert these changes if you can. The imagery you used is several years out of date; those paths do not exist and the building was already mapped properly as a construction area.
rivermont (2022-04-19 16:57:56+00:00): Reverted in changeset #119916479
xkillah (2022-11-13 08:24:39+00:00): Way 61793385 is a part of Kiketi, why did you named it as Kveseti?
ivanbranco (2022-11-13 08:56:01+00:00): The name Kveseti was added since V3, and during time it become a mess, with Kiketi in some names (like name:fr), and Kveseti in others (like name:en). I don't remember what exact reasoning I had 7 months ago while doing this edit, but I had some doubts for sure since I see now I created a note as well: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3134067

If you have local knowledge we can fix it, but then we would have two areas with the same name. If you confirm both areas belong to Kiketi village we can create a multipolygon having the two areas as outers.

ps. Are you Georgian? Do you know other Georgian mappers? There's a new OSM forum, it would be cool to have a Georgian community as other countries have.
xkillah (2022-11-13 09:13:53+00:00): Cadastre maps say that it's Kiketi and according to wiki https://ka.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E1%83%99%E1%83%95%E1%83%94%E1%83%A1%E1%83%94%E1%83%97%E1%83%98 Kveseti is quite far from here. I guess adding Kveseti name in v3 was a mistake.
And no, I'm not Georgian.
Emilius123 (2022-04-14 23:37:32+00:00): nice, bro
user_5359 (2022-04-16 15:02:31+00:00): Hello! You use for 104 nodes the new key description:board? What is the difference to location:description?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
nyampire (2022-04-16 07:51:53+00:00): 変更セットの内容、チェックしました。
位置の移動、きちんとできています。すばらしい！
この調子で、他の地物も描いてみたり、タグを追加してみたりしてください。

Happy Mapping！
Luen Warneke (2022-10-08 12:38:12+00:00): Fixed in 127198681
Supaplex (2022-04-15 03:56:54+00:00): 這應該是完全沒建成，而且也不應該連到台灣的鐵路系統

即便可以依照計劃書來畫，但標籤也下錯了，應該用 railway=proposed 才行
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119733629
Supaplex (2022-04-15 03:57:37+00:00): 另外也請加上來源，不然的話就會回退
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119733629
Paul Lin (2022-04-15 04:32:19+00:00): 等開始建再來畫吧，創個頭
jwjeng (2022-04-15 06:05:11+00:00): 不是應該等蓋好或至少開始施工中才來考慮怎麼畫嗎? 如果隨便來個天馬行空的點子都要畫出來，是不是也要考慮軌道電梯和通往月球火星的任意門了?
assanges (2022-04-15 06:13:42+00:00): 老鐵 走線連專家都沒定好 別亂標吧
mavl (2022-05-20 15:54:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:54:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:54:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:54:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
azakh-world (2022-04-16 06:08:01+00:00): Hello.
If the Seoul station https://www.osm.org/node/5772099311 does not serve subways, to which station does the stop_position https://www.osm.org/node/5893288219 which is a part of subway routes, belongs to?
Please address the subway validator https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/south-korea.html

Best regards,
Alexey
pamym (2022-10-19 03:25:45+00:00): Hi, all your bus stopping location in Taman Bunga Raya looks like it misplaced. Like bus stopping for TBR Anggerik point should be in front of Apartment Anggerik at TBR Kemuning point. Are you familiar with this place?
cnvery (2023-02-16 03:29:21+00:00): Hi @pamym,

Yes, I used to stay there.

However, I not sure latest status for now year 2023.

Kindly help to improve it if there is any latest changes on these bus stops.

Thank you!
StevenRen (2022-04-27 19:55:19+00:00): Can I change this ticket to be not require review as this change correct? The current map having some park's sites land in water.
BCNorwich (2022-05-07 07:02:02+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No, you can't change comments made here. It doesn't matter though most are not noticed. 

I've tweaked the park and water areas to the Bing imagery, looks OK now.

Regards Bernard.
Sammyhawkrad (2022-04-15 09:59:18+00:00): Hello PopeyePopcord, what is the source of these street names you are adding? These are not local names and quite alien compared to the existing street names.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 14:56:08+00:00): from an out of print map
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 20:23:52+00:00): that's okay
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 10:02:24+00:00): Please don't remove other names. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
user_5359 (2022-04-15 06:26:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't address information a second time (see the building ways). Also landuse isn't a key for a node.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-15 10:01:34+00:00): Please don't remove other names.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
ovruni (2022-04-15 05:06:59+00:00): Hola aurocka, en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado un edificio indicando "Ajustando área mal ubicada.", sin embargo estos edificios fueron dibujados mediante la imagen de Maxar, que es la imagen mas actual para zonas rurales (usted esta usando la de Bing). Por otra parte, se ha modificado una vía encuadrada a otra geometría que no lo es, por lo que he restaurado la vía. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
SistemaRayoXP (2022-04-15 05:48:00+00:00): Realmente es dirección Valle de la Misericordia, es un poco confuso
bxl-forever (2022-05-23 21:02:01+00:00): Your changes on Bank of Korea (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37815133) are incorrect.

* amenity=bank → remove this immediately, please.  This tag is only for a bank open to the public.  The headquarters of a bank—let alone a central bank—are primarily offices and customers are not expected here
* wikimedia_commons: if you want to use this tag, find a picture of the building.  A picture of Korean bank notes "because this is the central bank that prints those banknotes" is not relevant.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
InsertUser (2022-04-15 14:59:56+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I notice you haven't provided a source for this edit, I assume it is mostly local knowledge?

I have refined a few of the outlines with some more up to date imagery  (accessible with the 'B' key in the editor). For some reason the British Colonial Hilton wasn't showing up in the editor but was already in the database so I removed that duplicate. I expect it will be needing a new name soon following the recent news.

Let me know if you need any help or have any questions.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
PlaneMad (2022-08-08 19:32:03+00:00): Can you check if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526526770 should be Kailash Kund?

Amazing work with all the trail mapping!
Peter Van Geit (2022-08-09 06:04:12+00:00): Moved Kaplas Kund (as per Survey Maps) to alt_name
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
Syl (2022-11-10 19:06:30+00:00): Bonjour, je n'arrive pas à trouver de trace de cette D 87. Quelle source aviez-vous utilisé pour confirmer le contenu des notes ?
Syl (2023-07-23 13:03:27+00:00): En l'absence de réponse de votre part je viens de corriger en me basant sur la BD Topo.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:54:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:54:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
ualios (2022-04-24 17:17:12+00:00): Cambiata la segnaletica di recente?
ualios (2022-06-28 15:54:20+00:00): La tua modifica è palesemente errata sulla base delle ortofoto disponibili, per cui rinnovo la domanda e se non hai fonti più aggiornate sarebbe meglio correggere, visto che l'indicazione appare piuttosto pericolosa.
Syl (2024-06-10 08:09:27+00:00): J'ai annulé la suppression du terrain de foot qui a bien l'air d'exister. Il est possible de choisir d'annuler seulement une partie d'un groupe de modification.
MxxCon (2022-04-15 21:52:08+00:00): Hello.
This is invalid way to tag multiple addresses for a building. This should be done simply with address node.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119740673
eggie (2022-04-16 10:06:22+00:00): warnings:impossible_oneway:highway opgelost op Meibergdreef..
oneway=yes kan nooit doodlopend zijn.

De weg zonder highwaytag in highway=service veranderd

Gr eggie
eggie (2022-04-16 10:07:19+00:00): Je eigen tagging https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119741026
eggie (2022-04-16 09:50:25+00:00): Een deel van de inrit heeft geen highway tag... Het is een lege lijn?
highway=service???
eggie (2022-04-16 09:51:33+00:00): Zet ook op de andere slagboom wie er wel of niet doorheen mag..
eggie (2022-04-15 09:13:24+00:00): Dag Mavasnl,

Maar waarom is de afrit richting veer een highway=service
Moet dat dan niet een highway=tertiary_link zijn?  .. en kan deze gewoon aansluiten op het Pontplein? 
Nu loopt die afslag terug naar de kruising.
MVG
eggie
Mavasnl (2022-04-15 09:53:03+00:00): Je hebt gelijk. Het is vroeger een busstrook geweest. Ik zag dat dat vroeger zo werd aangegeven in osm.
Die afrit durf ik niet aan te sluiten op het pontplein, anders maak ik alle relaties weer kapot ;-)
eggie (2022-04-15 10:05:31+00:00): Ik kijk wel even  :)
Groet,
eggie
Mavasnl (2022-04-15 10:07:01+00:00): Top!
eggie (2022-04-15 10:10:13+00:00): Wanneer je van de highway=service een highway=tertiary_link maakt is het oke.
Dan kunnen bv hulpdiensten indien nodig nog altijd rechtdoor rijden. 
Mapse
eggie
tenzul (2022-04-18 15:17:20+00:00): Hallo jf_simon,

ich glaube es wäre einfacher gewesen nur der Brücke am Campingplatz layer=1 zu geben. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/308444738/history

Schöne Grüße und Frohe Ostern
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119741185
NLBRT (2025-07-17 09:45:17+00:00): Hi. I've noticed that every road created here (except for 2, w1052013400 and w1052013404) does not exist, i.e, they're false positives given by AI, which is easily verifiable with any satellite imagery.

The lack of QA for the edits here, that too while using AI which is prone to false positives every often, is concerning. So would you mind elaborating what made you go ahead with these?
SomeoneElse (2022-04-15 09:16:28+00:00): Also Strensall Common, from survey 11/4/2022, tr8733b
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-04-16 14:42:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1052015508. I assume a copy & paste error.
SimonPoole (2022-04-15 09:17:13+00:00): Hi, you seem to be deleting a very large number of building polygons in your recent changesets. Could you give some more information than just "Polygon Deleted" on why you are doing this?
Vinber (2022-04-17 15:29:17+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai effacé ce que vous aviez fait, je n'ai trouvé aucune trace des "Pires". Cela devait de l'humour ?

andriandri, est-ce vraiment utile ?

Bonne journée

PS : si je me suis trompé n'hésitez pas à me le dire, je serais tellement content :)
martien-176 (2022-05-14 16:12:00+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of your mappings.

Your buildings look ok. 

One remark though: you added a layer=-1 to one building. Layers are only applicable to eg bridges or tunnels. Besides that, for buildings mapped via HOT we only have to map building=yes. The fine details are left to local mappers.

Thanks for contributing and please keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119742861
unen (2022-04-15 09:55:27+00:00): The blue feature was above the greenery, so definitely not a water body. Wanted to clarify, seeing the invalid tag modification flag :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119742928
cxc (2022-04-19 10:05:37+00:00): Credo che il nome del monte sia proprio Betogli...
eggie (2022-04-16 09:57:23+00:00): Mario.. Ik heb Knooppunt 71 hersteld.. Je kunt helaas geen routerelaties bewerken met editor iD.
Dat kan alleen met JOSM.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-16 10:01:25+00:00): Knooppunt 65 en 66 hersteld
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-04 07:16:44+00:00): what have you meant by surface=c at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27714342/history and others?