piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
will-i-am (2020-05-24 06:48:00+00:00): Hi
I would definitely like to better understand your suggestions that the changes I made " destroyed the information that bikes are allowed to use this path."  The path is a multiuse path.  I created a relation and in the route relation I set it to the 3 uses I believe are permitted.  The 2 links below are to the hiking and the cycling interfaces for waymarkedtrails and the fact that both uses are rendered clearly show up.  
https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16!39.4315!-76.5742
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16!39.4315!-76.5742
Is there a specific program you are using that does not render the paths properly with the route relation set the way I did it?
Thanks 
Bill
will-i-am (2020-05-24 07:22:30+00:00): So Guys
I checked out https://www.cyclosm.org and see precisely what you are saying.  That   works differently the waymarkedtrails renderer which can render handle complex route relations with multiple uses.   relations.  It seems that perhaps Cyclosm needs to add some code so that it can recognize multiple use paths like waymarked trails.  Incidentally, there are OSMand overlays for waymarkedtrails for , hiking, cycling, MTB, sking and inline skating.
We are definitely working in a highly dynamic environment.
Richard (2020-05-24 07:50:40+00:00): Hi Bill - basically if you tag something as "highway=path" as you did, you're just saying "this is a path". You're not giving any information about who can use it.

You need to add bicycle=yes and foot=yes on the way to make it clear. Route relations are additional information; they don't obviate the need to have the correct way tagging.

In the route relations in particular, note that the semicolon-separated style you've used ("route=hiking;bicycle;foot") is idiosyncratic and undocumented, and most renderers/routers will not understand it.

Thanks for all your work! :)
Richard (2020-05-24 18:13:37+00:00): You're misunderstanding.

Tags do not cascade down from relations to ways. That isn't how OSM works. Relations are distinct entities that describe themselves.

Your relation is a route relation. It describes a route that follows some ways. It does not describe those ways themselves.

Access is specified by tags on ways.

I'm hesitant to do the whole "appeal to authority" thing, but as the third longest-standing contributor to OSM still active (since November 2004) and the developer of the site that probably does more in-depth tag parsing than any other (cycle.travel), I honestly do know what I'm talking about here. Thank you.
compdude (2020-08-16 05:43:09+00:00): Is this road still closed?
pdxrider (2020-08-16 12:17:20+00:00): It's permanently closed.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Portland/comments/cqe4na/sb_naito_to_eb_steel_bridge_ramp_permanently/
https://www.oregonlive.com/commuting/2019/08/bus-only-lane-coming-to-northwest-everett-street-on-approach-to-steel-bridge.html
Roadsguy (2020-06-14 01:00:17+00:00): Please don't add exit destinations to the motorway_junction name tag. OSM convention is to keep destinations in the destination tags, while the name on the motorway_junction node is reserved for proper interchange names, such as those on the PA Turnpike.
GOwin (2019-08-28 03:46:35+00:00): with certain exceptions, deleting existing features just to add your changes are  not considered as a good practice. If you're only adding a one way restriction, it's not difficult to add those tags to all applicable segments.   Do you mind sharing what happened here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73817468
seav (2019-08-28 05:01:40+00:00): @GOwin, I think you are misinterpreting the changes here. Nothing was deleted. Detroit and Don Alfredo were simply split at their common intersection.
GOwin (2019-08-28 05:15:44+00:00): I'm in the wrong here, and you're right, Eugene. 

@GrabPHPrince, when you do split roads, try to make sure that you split the other crossing roads in the vicinity, as well.
viloan (2019-08-28 00:49:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-08-28 00:52:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Romwriter (2020-12-28 20:57:01+00:00): Hallo MHD, Du hast eine Straße auf dem Mercedes-Werksgelände als "Fleetstraße" benannt. Hast Du dazu eine Quelle? Im amtlichen Straßenverzeichnis ist als öffentliche Straße mit dem gleichen Namen eine andere Straße (im Ortsteil Osterfeuerberg) aufgeführt.
MHD (2020-12-28 22:15:41+00:00): Die Fleetstraße ist keine öffentliche Straße sondern eine Straße auf dem Daimler Gelände, daher stammt auch die Werksinterne Bezeichnung. Bis zum Abriss der Schule und Verkauf des Geländes (zwischen Ausbildung und Halle 80) verlief die Straße Im Holter Feld weiter nach Süden.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-21 06:49:08+00:00): Can you kook at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2467929 ?
Howpper (2019-08-28 03:26:09+00:00): (US 95 / ID 53 / Government Way Interchange + Pope Road extension)
Takogin (2019-09-02 11:04:04+00:00): Hi! Please do not add fictional parks. I have to revert all your edits with fictional parks because most of them looks suspicious and overlap each other and other objects.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73818833
Supaplex (2020-01-02 14:16:25+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2019-08-28 16:27:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты. Пожалуйста, обратите внимание, что в OpenStreetMap в названиях улиц и переулков указывают слова "улица" и "переулок". Принято указывать "Лесной переулок".   
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3  
  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника вы взяли адресные данные?
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
viloan (2019-08-28 04:14:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
GOwin (2019-08-28 05:01:46+00:00): Thank you for the quick and positive response.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73821069
GOwin (2019-08-28 05:01:53+00:00): Thank you for the quick and positive response.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73821069
ChehrehBargi (2020-08-15 06:39:30+00:00): باسلام و ضمن خسته نباشید
برای ثبت محدوده محلات، از مرز حکومتی استفاده کنید و در مرکز محدوده آن محله از لیبل همسایگی استفاده نمایید.
برای مثال مرزهای حکومتی که اسنپی‌ها رسم کرده‌اند را ببینید.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-09-01 16:09:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73976466 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3138].
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
abakus_uploader (2019-08-28 22:30:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
czubi (2019-12-06 16:08:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/719108220
?
_torsten_ (2019-12-06 16:51:06+00:00): Ups ... das ist eine vergessene Hilfslinie. Werde ich gleich entfernen.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-09-01 16:09:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73976466 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3138].
mavl (2019-09-01 16:08:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73976466 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3138].
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-09-01 16:09:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73976466 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3138].
mavl (2019-09-01 16:09:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73976466 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3138].
mavl (2019-09-01 16:09:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73976466 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3138].
mavl (2019-08-29 16:29:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
Pierce (2019-08-28 20:05:03+00:00): Hi There,

It appears you have assigned a parish wikidata entry to this administrative boundary. Can you please be more careful in the future?
Warin61 (2019-08-29 07:01:47+00:00): This is relations broken ... 9973516 Boralma
Warin61 (2019-11-24 23:27:09+00:00): Revert .. 5 mins.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
aharvey (2019-09-12 04:45:26+00:00): @ecoeng Changeset comments are to provide context or a description of what the change is and why it's being made, not to make personal attacks against other contributors.

I invite you to join in the discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html
aharvey (2019-09-12 05:39:03+00:00): documenting this changeset was reverted in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/73962085
dafadllyn (2021-03-31 19:41:07+00:00): Hallo, ich habe das Tag building=yes auf dem Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6751885882 entfernt, da es an diesem Ort kein Gebäude gibt. Im Gebäude- und Wohnungsregister ist diese Adresse übrigens nicht enthalten.
dafadllyn (2021-03-31 19:49:00+00:00): Dasselbe Problem übrigens auch mit dieser Adresse gleich daneben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6751885881. Auch diese Adresse ist Gebäude- und Wohnungsregister nicht enthalten.
sovereign_ch (2021-03-31 23:00:09+00:00): building=yes braucht es mittlerweile (also seit "März 2021") definitiv nicht auf Adressknoten in der Schweiz. Das war IIRC mal ein "Stellvertreter"-tagging, als die Satellitenbilder (Bing, Maxar, Esri) so miserabel waren, dass man einzelne Gebäude nicht ausmachen konnte – also Adresse auf node und "b=y", fertig.

In Zürich haben wir zudem viele solcher "technischen" Adressen auf Unterständen (ÖV, Velo, sonstwas) oder Tiefgaragen, oder "adressenlosen", unterirdischen Gebäuden. Ist für mich OK (kann man glaub mit unsigned=yes markieren?), aber dann bitte auch seitens amtlicher Vermessung und/oder GWR konsequent. Ich meine: "202" scheint nur der mittlere von fünf Unterständen zu sein (hab jetzt der Diskussion willen im AV/MOpublic gespickt), während die anderen vier... ja was?! Irritiert mich, zuhause hätte GeoZ längst ein E-Mail von mir im Postfach – ja, ich übertreibe etwas... ;-)

Was ich mir allerdings sicher bin: romanh hat sich dies beim Eintragen _nicht_ aus den Fingern gesogen. Kann sein dass dies im aktuellsten GWR nicht mehr drin ist. Aber es hatte definitiv mal eine Grundlage.

A propos "204": Perrondach. Während "206" scheinbar Dienstgebäude (Kiosk, WC, "Schalter") _und_ das überspannende Dach umfasst. Logisch? Na ja...
dafadllyn (2021-04-01 17:01:57+00:00): Hallo! Danke für die Erklärung. Nein, logisch ist das nicht. In dem Fall sind diese Adressen auch nicht so wichtig. Dass sich jemand die Adressen oder Gebäude ausgedacht hat, davon bin ich übrigens nicht ausgegangen. Besten Gruss
mavl (2019-08-29 16:29:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.
mavl (2019-08-29 16:30:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73891387 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: duplicates of roads, copyrighed source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73835765.