piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2020-05-24 22:31:53+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ToniE (2020-10-12 10:18:25+00:00): Servus,

Frage: der Nymphenburger Kanal führt doch eigentlich ganzjährig Wasser, oder?

Hier ist ein Übrigbleibsel von einem leisure=ice_rink mit seasonal=yes, bei dem das leisure entfernt wurde und nun der Kanal seasonal=yes ist.

Könnte das seasonal gelöscht werden?

Viele Grüße
Toni
marcoSt (2020-10-12 19:11:21+00:00): Servus Toni,

Eigentlich ja. Es war ursprünglich für die temporäre Eisbahn gedacht. Aber so wie Du das beschrieben hast, macht das wenig Sinn. Danke für den Hinweis.

Viele Grüße

Marco
user_2066394 (2020-05-24 20:35:33+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85693951
niklasliebig (2020-05-24 20:46:54+00:00): Guter Tipp, danke.
hstk (2020-05-24 20:28:50+00:00): ignore!
trial (2020-05-29 13:23:15+00:00): Bonjour je vois que tu as supprimé un bâtiment plutôt juste déplacé (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807876555). Pourquoi ne pas avoir préservé l'historique ?
b-jazz (2020-06-12 16:47:39+00:00): Hi pwhite. You might want to take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1787821171#map=14/39.6212/-79.8103
It looks like a large set of points were accidentally shifted a large distance. And since the changeset involves hundreds of changes, I'm not sure if reverting it would even work.
Can you take a look into fixing things up?
MarcoR (2020-07-15 12:04:56+00:00): Ciao!
Con questo gruppo di modifiche hai spostato una panchina da "lato sentiero" a dentro il bosco; si tratta di un errore?
MarcoR (2020-07-19 10:08:02+00:00): Ok, ho risolto il problema rimettendo al suo posto originario la panchina.

Buona continuazione ;)
eggie (2020-05-25 05:56:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
BCNorwich (2020-05-25 07:53:08+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Disconnected the path from administrative boundary and removed the two unneeded nodes from the boundary line.

I disconnected the bridleway (KA18) from the railway above. Removed the section joining to Hartwell Road, and tweaked the existing section of service road as that is the bridleway. (It's OSM practice to amend existing ways rather than add duplicates.) Also tweaked the bridleway tagging to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.
stephenj139 (2020-05-25 10:29:42+00:00): Thank you Bernard
BR tagging noted for future reference
chachafish (2020-05-24 22:37:13+00:00): Howdy :) I don't mean to discourage your edits, but the service road next to 20th Street, adjacent to the bridge is a level 0 road. Was there a source you have or a QA tool that said it wasn't? Thanks :)
Natfoot (2020-05-25 01:44:53+00:00): Howdy, It has been changed back.
chachafish (2020-05-25 03:17:34+00:00): Cheers :)
corfede (2020-05-31 11:46:01+00:00): Ciao, il codice SPxx o SSxx, ecc. vanno messi nel tag ref, non nel name. Correggo. Ciao, Federico.
czubi (2020-05-25 11:49:24+00:00): Hallo Bryan, danke für deine Änderung in OSM.Ich habe deiner Firma noch einen Haupttag und die Webseite hinzugefügt.
Kannst du mir sagen welche Hausnummern noch "Am Gut" zugeordnet sind?
BryanLieno (2020-05-25 12:48:03+00:00): Es gibt nur die Nr. 1.
Der Straßenname wurde extra für unsere Firma geändert, weil uns die Speditionen in der alten Schäferei oft nicht gefunden haben.
Es gibt kein weiteres Gebäude an dieser kurzen Straße.
Da die Amtsmühlen sehr langsam mahlen, 
Bryan
BryanLieno (2020-05-25 12:48:32+00:00): ... tragen wir das jetzt selber überall ein...
czubi (2020-05-25 14:43:59+00:00): Ok. Danke, habs mir eben selbst angeschaut. Was meinst du mit  "... tragen wir das jetzt selber überall ein.."
BryanLieno (2020-05-25 15:02:01+00:00): Es dauert uns zu lange, bis der neue Straßenname in der letzten Datenbank angekommen ist. Es gibt seit Umnennung erhebliche Probleme mit Speditionen, der Post etc., weil es eben dauert, bis der Eintrag überall passiert. Allerdings beim Katasteramt ging es schnell ...
czubi (2020-05-25 15:16:20+00:00): OSM ist eine freie Datenbank aus der jeder der möchte eine ihm genehme Karte generieren kann. Hat nichts mit amtlichen Karten zu tun. Und hier ist "dein" Strassenname ja nun drin und auch auf der Karte sichtbar. Also verweise bei denen die dir was liefern müssen einfach auf eine Karte die OSM als Basis nutzt. Bei allen anderen Karten sind dir vermutlich die Hände gebunden...
czubi (2020-05-25 15:21:48+00:00): Als deutschlandweite Adressgrundlage für ALLES dient der Plz- Server der Post
https://www.postdirekt.de/plzserver/
Solange die Adresse dort fehlt wirst du wohl einen langen Atem brauchen.
BryanLieno (2020-05-25 15:41:49+00:00): Alles klar, danke!
Vinber (2020-05-25 16:44:51+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap !
il y a déjà un restaurant O'Tacos (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4248820612#map=19/44.83282/-0.64620), vous semblez en avoir ajouté un autre en ayant écrit par dessus le fast-food Génération Kebab (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1886724859#map=19/44.83282/-0.64620)?
Pouvez vous nous préciser ce qu'il en est effectivement ?
à bientôt
Vincent
Jeb33 (2020-05-25 19:55:41+00:00): Le restaurant Génération Kebab n'est plus à cette adresse. Il a été remplacé il y a quelques années par le restaurant O TACOS
Vinber (2020-06-01 10:35:59+00:00): ok, j'ai retiré totalement le génération kebab alors !
Tomas Straupis (2020-05-25 05:56:21+00:00): Atkeičiau atgal į tourism=attraction. Monument yra: piramidės, stonehendžas ir pan. Žodžiu Lietuvoje nėra (arba dar neradom) nei vieno historic=monument.
corfede (2020-05-31 08:38:09+00:00): Ciao, per i semafori che si trovano sugli incroci non si deve usare il tag "traffic_signals:direction", come meglio specificato qui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals:direction. "Note that this tagging is ambiguous in case the node belongs to more than one highway=*! For this reason, use the traffic_signals:direction=* tag only on nodes which are part of exactly one highway. Avoid junction nodes and nodes between two ways as well". Correggo, ma se vuoi chiarimenti sono a disposizione. Ciao, Federico
Stargehzer (2020-05-25 14:56:19+00:00): Why don't I see any change on the map? 
I left a note on the jut of forest at the back of 96 Kenninghall Cres. & 42 Steen Dr.  (This bit of forest here on the map that juts onto private land is not a forest, it is the back yard lawns of homes.
The forest should follow the fenceline of the homes at #42 Steen Dr. & #96 Kenninghall Cres. The fence line can be seen on this map, http://www6.mississauga.ca/missmaps/maps.aspx#map=18/-8874320.15/5404909.04/0.9075712110370514
Perhaps the error was made about 9 years ago when this edit was made... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1348750038#map=17/43.60810/-79.71669
The homes have been there since the 1970s.).
I recieved an email that  Jarek Piórkowski had made changes, but when I look at the map, no changes.
Does it take time to take effect?
(3 days ago I'd never heard of OpenStreetMap, apologies if I'm doing something wrong)
Jarek 🚲 (2020-05-25 17:23:32+00:00): Yes, it does take some time to reflect the changes on openstreetmap.org. Sometime a hard-reload (pressing ctrl-shift-r on a desktop browser) will make them appear. You might also sometimes see stale data at different zoom levels. This is because the map images are not regenerated live but are cached.
elgolfo (2020-05-25 15:15:16+00:00): Hallo Wanderer_BB,

willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe dein Changeset angeschaut, weil du »review requested« markiert hast. 
Es sieht gut aus, nur zwei Anmerkungen:
bicycle=yes und foot=yes sind bei highway=track unnötig, da diese Berechtigungen bei diesen Wegen implizit sind. 
Du könntest noch smoothness=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness) für die Wegbeschaffenheit angeben, das hilft Routern für Radfahrer und Wanderer. 

Viele Grüße 
Moritz
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85696103
Wanderer_BB (2020-06-06 16:14:16+00:00): Danke für den Tipp! Hab die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit ergänzt.
chachafish (2020-05-24 23:30:10+00:00): Thanks for making the changes here. Good stuff :)
Hjart (2020-05-26 06:56:14+00:00): Please note that valid mapillary tags looks like in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712398741
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mapillary
Hjart (2020-05-26 07:18:30+00:00): Also please note that you should not add the same link to the both the image and the description tag
km2bp (2020-05-29 20:28:23+00:00): The short mapillary link as recommended by Wikipedia does not work .   I am very sorry that you deleted my photos.  I do not add the same link in the description. Example 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7323721207  
Example 2 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381963710
  This edition has destroyed all my work  
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85748063 
OpenPoiMap search engine needs the "Image" key to work properly You can see what all the churches in Norway look like  I create very useful photomaps. If you are disturbed by mapillars, remove them but don't move the photos. Due to actions like yours I lose my enthusiasm for mapping. Don't take this from me.  Please, bring back my photos on Preikestolen, or add your own nicer pics to the map .  Here are examples of my photomaps  :  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/km2bp/diary/391419
Hjart (2020-05-29 21:10:37+00:00): The short mapillary link works as intended. The long links you're creating do not (they do not work with i.e. JOSM).
Hjart (2020-05-29 21:14:15+00:00): example where you added the same link to both mapillary, image and description: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7323721207
km2bp (2020-05-29 21:20:48+00:00): The long link works everywhere just like a phone number together with the country code. I don't care about Mapillary, since it bothers you so much. There are dozens of pages and applications that use the "Image" key. Please do not delete "Image". 
Here is another map using the image key
http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/en/index.html?zoom=18&lat=59.67325&lon=10.60677&pid=HaHbHcSaHe
km2bp (2020-05-29 21:28:21+00:00): "The short mapillary link works as intended. The long links you're creating do not (they do not work with i.e. JOSM)."    Our maps are also used by ordinary people, not just editors. By right clicking on an object they want to get hyperlinks and not secret code that works only in the JOSM editor.   The Link to Mapilary allows you to view the photo in full resolution and view their entire sequence
Hjart (2020-05-29 21:35:30+00:00): Please do not use long links with the mapillary tag. That was not how it was intended to be used
km2bp (2020-05-29 21:39:14+00:00): If I stop doing this, will you withdraw your changes to Preikestolen?
km2bp (2020-05-29 21:41:33+00:00): Doesn't bother anyone but why does it bother you so much?
Hjart (2020-05-29 21:52:06+00:00): Because as I've allready said; the short links works as intended. Long links do not and I wouldn't want you to overwrite otherwise valid short links
km2bp (2020-05-29 21:56:59+00:00): I don't care about the Mapillary key that I can completely remove, and what about the "Image" key? Have you already read the examples given by me?
MikeN (2020-05-25 11:36:02+00:00): What was being cleaned up?  Some of the deleted ways appear to be confirmed by recent surveys.  Also, keeping demolished:highway tags for an imagery cycle helps keep armchair mappers from re-adding ways from imagery.
boopington (2020-05-25 20:49:12+00:00): Surveys? It sure didnt seem like it considering a few of the things i deleted were roads that have been removed for development, besides i would hope everyone should know to check all imagery layers before adding something.
MikeN (2020-05-26 00:31:28+00:00): The typical use of demolished:highway is when construction moves faster than the newest imagery is updated - checking all imagery layers won't help in that case.  I did see one with a check date of 2020-03-15, I'm not sure how significant that was if it was in the middle of a new development.    The reason this changeset was flagged was the large area of the changeset and many deletions, but otherwise it looks like normal cleanup to match new development.
boopington (2020-05-26 02:08:24+00:00): Ok, so once there IS a new imagery layer that shows it is indeed gone, shouldnt you be able to delete it then?
MikeN (2020-05-26 12:33:28+00:00): Yes, it may be deleted when the default imagery layer is updated - depending on whether the date the imagery was taken is newer than the last edit date of the object being deleted.   I've gotten GPS coordinates of a road inside a construction area and used that to create a street under construction which wouldn't show on the newest imagery.   Probably not a big deal, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781660324 was one that came up as source=survey in March.
Jordi MF (2020-05-25 23:35:55+00:00): Hola,

Antes que nada, gracias por mejorar los datos de OSM y normalizar los nombres de los edificios de la UPV.

He corregido las zonas de césped porque estaban mapeadas como parques. Los parques, en OSM, son zonas amplias con vegetación en la que la gente puede hacer diversas actividades de ocio.
Saludos y buen mapeo.
TS89000 (2020-06-03 20:34:23+00:00): Hallo Nachtspazz, 
hast du destination vom Pfad 75017258 absichtlich entfernt? Ich meine, in Erinnerung zu haben, dass auf den etwas ungewöhnlich angebrachten Schildern in Bach und Erbach zumindest bis vor Kurzem auch Anlieger frei stand.
Grüße
Nachtspazz (2020-06-04 20:04:04+00:00): Hallo, ich habe das Ganze nur von Bach gesehen. Dort gibt es ein Anlieger-Schild, das sich meines Erachtens aber auf die Pfade https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807913259 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801958316 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182003200 bezieht. Bist du sicher, dass es von Erbach auch so ein Schild gibt? Wenn ja, gehört destination wieder hin.
Gruß
TS89000 (2020-06-05 08:12:29+00:00): Es könnte auch die Zufahrt zu den Schrebergärten weiter bei Erbach gemeint sein. 
Ich komme oft an der Stelle vorbei. Werde die Schilder und die Pfeile darauf bei nächster Gelegenheit genauer anschauen.
TS89000 (2020-06-05 18:32:52+00:00): Ich war vor Ort: auf der seitlichen Tafel an der Einmündung zum https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374404715 ist das Zeichen 260
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3DDE:260 mit einem Zusatz "Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr und Radfahrer frei" (seltsam). Der aktuelle Stand passt also. Hatte ich wohl falsch in Erinnerung.
woodpeck (2020-05-26 08:55:23+00:00): I find Coconino National Forest strange in many respects. Is the checkerboard pattern south of Lake Navajo really correct
In the village of Pine Glade, is it correct that a small part of Lake Mary Road is inside the National Forest, or that the mobile home at 2000-50 East Frontier Ave lies partly inside, and partly outside the National Forest? At Flagstaff airport, that a small bit of the runway lies inside the National Forest, as well as various disjunct bits of I17? Are the various names this forest carries really *names* or just an attempt at translating the original name into other languages? South of the Cave Springs campground there's an area around "Shady Lane" where tiny bits are cut out of the National Forest area which seems to make very little sense... what is the source of all this, and is that source reliable at all?
woodpeck (2020-05-26 10:02:02+00:00): I meant to write "Camp Navajo" not "Lake Navajo", sorry.
user_6771650 (2020-05-26 22:16:03+00:00): The source of the boundary is the US Forest Service shapefiles. With digitized parcel data there's going to be a bit of error, especially in remote areas, I assume. The inner areas are (mainly) private property which is obviously not protected land like the rest of the National Forest. The small inner areas can probably be removed for simplicity, but that is the *legal* boundary of the forest. As far as the checkerboard pattern, it is odd, but correct. If you check the arizona lands website http://gis.azland.gov/webapps/parcel/?loc=-111.7735,35.1182,12&layers=3,2,0 
it shows the other parcels are state trust land. On the osm wiki for national forest it states that the OSM boundary for national forests should be the land owned and therefore protected by the Forest Service, not including private property. Many national forests in OSM are mapped as the proclamation boundaries, not the land actually protected by the Forest Service. For example. Gila National Forest encompasses entire towns. 

About the names, they are attempts to translate, not official names. I have a limited level of knowledge on the language names I added, but they are not official names, Turkish, german and spanish names were not added by me. I was not aware that specific language names had to be official and not translations. I can remove the multilingual names
b-jazz (2020-06-04 16:02:22+00:00): Are you familiar with the sidewalks in this area? One in particular is drawn in such a way that it doubles back on itself (nodes A-B-C-B-A) and also includes an "incline" tag. I tried to fix the fact that it shouldn't double back on itself, but then the question arose of which way the incline actually points (A-B-C or is it C-B-A) if that makes sense. Is this something you can fix because you might have local knowledge? Thanks (and thanks for the contributions).
yadavta (2020-08-04 04:36:56+00:00): Yea, I run in that area quite often. Which sidewalk in specific are you talking about? 
Thanks for the help!
b-jazz (2020-08-04 17:12:35+00:00): Sorry for not being specific in my original comment. I usually remember to mention an exact way url. This is the way that no exists and I'm not sure the incline tag is correct: https://www.osm.org/way/820207768 If you could take a look and correct/verify it, that would be great. Thanks.
Warin61 (2020-08-22 06:53:46+00:00): Hi,
Relation shares outer ways.. 
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.29612&lat=-36.36974&zoom=18
mariotomo (2021-09-22 23:24:41+00:00): this is a complex changeset, which has introduced artifacts that simply aren't there.  all intersections and reverse loops have been represented as distinct ways, which isn't the case, virtually nowhere all along the Panamanian Panamericana. Author stopped mapping when asked to discuss such massive edits with the community.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85697346
Brayan Ameth (2021-09-23 00:29:23+00:00): I stopped mapping because you had more important things. What you say has 0 value.
Thanks for the comment that no one asked for. Greetings bro.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85697346
mariotomo (2021-09-23 00:53:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111565401
mariotomo (2022-06-15 01:11:19+00:00): mapper came back with same mapping style and non descriptive changeset comments. i hope to find a viable compromise, after all, we just care for quality, we only need to understand what is best for OSM.
praeteritum (2023-07-27 12:02:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139083209.
chachafish (2020-05-30 06:49:35+00:00): Howdy. I think Devlin Lane got away from you here ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=59815193#map=19/35.31277/-119.10620
Dion Dock (2020-05-30 21:36:54+00:00): Whoops, drag and drop error.  Fixed.
chachafish (2020-05-31 01:58:17+00:00): It happens to everybody 😉
Mike Baggaley (2020-05-31 20:24:28+00:00): Hi, this change looks wrong as it results in the cycleway from Princes Parkway ending with nowhere to go. The section of road under the motorway is tagged as having a cycle lane, but access has been changed to prohibit bicycles and pedestrians. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
Minh Nguyen (2020-09-15 05:12:22+00:00): Thanks for making the route relation more manageable. Breaking up these massive relations means a lot to me, as someone who uses Web-based editors.

Changeset 90897098 changes the Little Miami Scenic Trail back to highway=cycleway. The North Country Trail and Buckeye Trail happen to traverse the Little Miami trail, but the it’s more well-known as a bike trail. Access tags are sufficient for conveying that the trail is also designated for hiking and horse-riding.
user_6771650 (2020-05-25 04:05:59+00:00): Hello,
could you please use more descriptive changeset comments? Using the same comment over 100 times does not tell anyone what you are doing.
Joey Samson (2020-05-25 04:55:06+00:00): Central Luzon from Aurora to Zambales boundaries please
bielebog (2020-05-25 20:35:13+00:00): Der Sportplatz ist schon als Fläche eingetragen. Ein weiterer Node in der Mitte ist überflüssig.
felipeeugenio (2020-05-25 22:57:18+00:00): Estimado. Bienvenido a OSM.
Por favor no usar nombres genéricos (vereda, plaza, etc) y detallas los contornos de las bases de los edificios. No usamos dibujos generalizador de las estructuras. Voy a corregir algunas de sus ediciones. Por favor, si quiere interactuar con la comunidad unirse al chat de telegram indicado en mi perfil.
saludos y muchas gracias
literan (2020-05-25 17:21:06+00:00): добрый день. Тег oneway=no лишний, его нигде не ставят, т.к. он является "по умолчанию"
Burabay Damu (2020-05-25 05:18:53+00:00): еще завершил велодорожку до Бурабайлэнда
Scrapper81 (2020-05-25 05:40:19+00:00): Hello,
   I'm working on the BING map to import OSM data into a digital golf lidar tool re-create the course for golf simulation and game play on PC, Xbox, and PS4.  It appears some holes have been re-designed on the actual course.
user_5359 (2020-05-26 04:25:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
aceman444 (2020-12-10 22:50:03+00:00): Zdravim, prosim nevymyslajte si anglicke nazvy (ako Trojičná Ice Cream) ak nie su oficialne, na objekte napisane alebo vseobecne zname. Len pre to, ze nieco e mozne prelozit, neznamena, ze to treba napisat do name:en.

A tie "2 byty" nie su ziadnou atrakciou a taketo komentare do OSM nepatria.

Dakujem.
Joey Samson (2020-05-25 09:14:56+00:00): Central Luzon please
seav (2020-05-26 05:53:33+00:00): (@Joey Samson: will you please stop spamming changesets with your requests? Changeset comments are for discussing the edits within a changeset, not for off-topic requests.)