piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tjuro (2022-09-26 17:04:36+00:00): Bij “De oost ingang wordt niet doorgetrokken tot de middelste ring.” Bedoelde ik de zuidelijke ingang de highway= unclassified.

Nu dat verhaal over wat wel en niet junction=roundabout moet zijn. Het zit zo:

Eerst bepaal je waar de rotonde begint, dat is wanneer de way de buitenste ring binnen komt. Dus de binnenste en buitenste ringen zijn allemaal junction=roundabout ook eventuele tussen stukken tussen ring één en ring twee.

Bij uitrij stukken is er geen duidelijk punt waarbij de junction=roundabout stopt, hier kies ik meestal het stuk waarbij de bocht naar links transitioneert naar de bocht naar rechts.

Dit is belangrijk omdat anders als je anders van het zuiden naar het oosten wilt rijden de router nooit kan weten dat het een rotonde is en dat er dus voorrang verleend moet worden.

Verder is de bovenste way geen rotonde. Dit omdat het telt als “slip lane” het maakt in principe niet uit voor de rotonde zelf. Er hoeft geen voorang verleend te worden. Wel is het een non-link want het is de hoofdroute. Als het een secundaire route was had ik het wel met *_link getagd.
mueschel (2022-09-27 10:00:21+00:00): Hi,
it seems something went wrong here. All these nodes have a couple of strange tags that don't look like they should be in OSM:

List_Dishes = Fast Foods
List_of_Sauces = Pork, Goat meat, Chicken, Fish, Liver
food = Fast Foods
Micheal Kal (2022-09-27 10:30:13+00:00): Hi Mueschel, appologies! I forgot to delete some of the columns i the data but let me fix it. Thank you
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
NieWnen (2022-09-27 08:47:32+00:00): Proszę nie rób tak!

Nie usuwaj fragmentów dróg jeśli są w przebudowie.

Do tego jest odpowiednie tagowanie

highway=construction construction=<przewidywany typ drogi>

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction

To samo się tyczy innych obiektów.

Przy okazji jakie jest źródło tych zmian?
PoprawiamTuITam (2022-09-27 10:14:44+00:00): Przepraszam, rozumiem. Byłem tam osobiście w niedzielę, stąd moja edycja. Czy mogę jakoś dodać zdjęcie dla potwierdzenia?
NieWnen (2022-09-27 10:17:33+00:00): Nie musisz, po prostu byłem ciekawy źródła.
Wycofałem poprzednią zmianę (aby zachować historię). Zerknij proszę w powyższego linka jak to poprawnie oznaczyć.
mariotomo (2022-09-26 22:10:36+00:00): hola Mappernerd … could you be so kind and support us interested in revising changesets? It would be of great help if you would describe **what** you're updating and adding, in particular including **your intentions**. After all, you're intervening on a database, obviously you're doing UPDATE or INSERT, so your changeset description is equivalent to being empty (or even misleading in its emptiness, since here you also DELETE objects).
thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
mariotomo (2022-09-26 22:14:39+00:00): hola … question: why did you delete the original park, just to create a new object? if you need help on the subject preserving history, please ask.
user_4081914 (2022-09-27 06:47:23+00:00): The original park area was connected to the highway. There has been much discussion of forums whether it is desirable to connect areas to highways. Although not technically incorrect the general concensus is that it is not good practice. To Disconnect it from a highway it is easier to cut and paste the land area rather than spending time disconnecting individual nodes. If you feel strongly about connecting it back to the highway then please go ahead.
mariotomo (2022-09-27 11:18:10+00:00): i think i managed to make you miss the point. i agree with your version of the park, but i think you should have preserved history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337482926.
user_4081914 (2022-09-27 11:36:55+00:00): OK I can agree with that
mariotomo (2022-09-27 15:59:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126704386
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Piskvor (2022-09-29 09:31:12+00:00): Lávka sice ve výstavbě je, ale stezka vedoucí po lávce dosud ve výstavbě být nemůže (není _na čem_ ji stavět, přes hlavní rameno dosud žádná lávka není, jen pilíře - a lávka přes plavební kanál taky ještě není ve stavu, kdy by se dalo začít se svrchní stavbou). Za čtvrt roku už bude tento changeset odpovídat realitě, aspoň doufám :)
Piskvor (2022-09-29 09:38:21+00:00): Samotná mostní konstrukce ve stavu "construction" je, viz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020334253
Piskvor (2022-09-29 09:47:59+00:00): V konečném důsledku je to tady akademická diskuse, ani pro uživatele map, ani pro datové konzumenty to nebude _v této fázi výstavby_ už úplně zásadní, jak moc je ta lávka ne/dokončená, pokud má být do pár měsíců hotovo; tahat se o to tam a zpátky nemíním. Jediné, co mi tam trochu vadí, je to "bridge=yes," tj. "tady je v terénu most," ačkoli tam zatím reálně není. *Proto* jsem tagoval budoucí cesty po mostě jako proposed, a most samotný jako construction.
kainloma (2022-09-29 21:01:04+00:00): Trochu se ztrácím v Tvojí argumentaci, ale souhlasím, že diskuse je akademická. Nicméně pokud je teď ve stavu "proposed" kdy teda bude ve stavu "contstruction"? Protože v momentu, kdy bude možné po ní projít bude prakticky otevřená. 
Rovněž teda mimochodem není pravda, že jsou tam pouze pilíře. Už několik týdnů osazují segmenty mostovky. Ale podle mě na tom nezáleží, prostě je ve výstavbě.
Piskvor (2022-09-30 08:32:57+00:00): Včera ráno jsem na to koukal, mostovka je přes plavební kanál (z pravého břehu na Štvanici), přes hlavní rameno (ze Štvanice na levý břeh) dosud ne.

Jinak současný stav je podle mě construction:bridge=yes highway=proposed ; tak za měsíc-dva se dostaneme k bridge=yes highway=construction, a někdy v lednu-únoru k bridge=yes highway=cycleway foot=yes access=[smazáno] .
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Jose Riha (2025-09-19 16:08:22+00:00): ahoj, fyi: lokomotivy boli presunute - vid https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4969080
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
SHARCRASH (2022-09-26 21:56:48+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM as contributor and thank you for adding this new way. New trails, always appreciated! :) 

Little note to be careful about: you hadn't connected it to the main road on the West side. So if someone would try to use routing services on that way, it wouldn't be able to pass that western end point or the way wouldn't even be selected to pass over. I did the correction along few little enhancements.
SHARCRASH (2022-09-26 21:58:14+00:00): Rather "welcome back"! :)
NieWnen (2022-09-27 08:57:17+00:00): Jeśli jest zakaz skrętu z ul Rozłogi z 2 kierunków, to zapytam, czy może jest to ulica 1 kierunkowa? Bo wtedy nie trzeba tych restrykcji w ogóle i wystarczy tag oneway=yes
PoprawiamTuITam (2022-09-27 10:09:56+00:00): Hej, nie jest jednokierunkowa, ale przy skrzyżowaniu z ul. Rozłogi z obu stron jest znak zakazu wjazdu B-2 - także nie ma legalnie opcji przejazdu między tymi ulicami, wjazd i wyjazd z tej mniejszej ulicy jest tylko w lewym dolnym rogu tego pomarańczowego prostokąta. Ulica służy tylko do dojazdu na miejsca postojowe.
Tjuro (2022-09-26 10:06:03+00:00): Hallo weatherwood,

Als het een broodjes zaak is dan zou ik dat mappen met: cuisine=sandwich en amenity=fast_food.

Veder formateren wij telefoon nummers met het: +31 123 456 789 formaat.

En de source van het object zelf passen we meestal niet aan, de source van de informatie staat namelijk al op de changeset, de source van het object komt van de import.

Voor opennings tijden zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

MVG Tjuro
FahRadler (2022-12-11 12:44:13+00:00): Hallo klaas,
du hast hier "neue" MS-Leitungen erfasst - aus uralten Bing LB.
Da du häufiger Strominfrastruktur mappst, sollte dir doch der Trend MS-Freileitungen durch Erdkabeltrassen zu ersetzen schon mal begegnet sein.
Mit ein bisschen Hirnschmalz hättest du 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174511516
gefunden - die abgebaute Leitung.
Es geht nix über Ortskenntnis.
_klaas_ (2022-12-11 14:38:23+00:00): Dann lösch sie doch wieder. Kein Grund mich so anzugreifen.
HirschKauz (2022-09-26 09:15:28+00:00): Kontrolle erbeten weil meine erste turn_restriction. Ich musste die 'K 43' mit bereits 3 existierenden Relationen am node=884583096 splitten - ist das so ok?
highflyer74 (2022-09-26 09:36:48+00:00): Moin! Das sieht gut aus!
HirschKauz (2022-09-26 10:31:28+00:00): Supi, Danke!
cxc (2022-09-28 14:26:09+00:00): Why?
this is wrong, please correct
Swihail (2022-09-30 10:39:44+00:00): Hi cxc, thanks for pointing this out. I had removed the spike in the building because it was not in line with the shape on the Bing imagery. But in fact, the imagery does not provide full clarity, so I have reverted the change.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 10:40:17+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and applied correct tagging for World of Smoke & Vape POI in changeset 183868310

https://osm.org/changeset/183868310
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-01 13:13:59+00:00): why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668606940/history is highway=unclassified? Is it leading to some settlement?
Eman Ghareeb (2023-10-02 06:27:31+00:00): Hello Mateusz Konieczny;
Thank you for reaching out, this street is connected between many hamlets starting from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/330514595
to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6200201227
Also, the classification before was "highway=road" and our colleague updated the classification to match the surrounding streets in this area.
Regards
Eman Ghareeb
josmougn (2023-09-29 20:23:05+00:00): Salut Jean-Marc, 
Je trouve abusif de mettre "bicyle=designated" sur ce chemin :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71926927
Je trouve "designated" difficile à traduire, mais pour moi ça veut dire que le chemin est officiellement destiné aux vélos, voire réservé pour eux, que sa réalisation est cohérente avec l'usage prévu et qu'une signalétique du code de la route est en place.
Ici on n'a rien de tout ça, un simple chemin qui n'a pas changé depuis des années et rien n'indique que c'est pour les cyclistes, rien ne les interdit non plus.
Il n'y a qu'un panneau indicateur qu'on pourrait traduire dans osm par une relation d'itinéraire et un node information=guidepost.
A la limite "bicycle=yes" quoique inutile car c'est un accès par défaut de "highway=track" (comme pour path).
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.771252105697&lng=2.1411580245113&z=17&pKey=346895347776071&focus=photo
A +, José
VELODB (2023-10-01 11:59:14+00:00): Le panneau n'est pas conforme à l'IISR mais y ressemble.

bicycle désignated correspond à un cheminement 'officiellement' consacré au vélo en particulier avec un panneau

Pour une fois qu'un chemin du type rural est un peu consacré aux vélos

Remarque : on manque d'un balisage complet le long de la Bièvres quand on quitte la Véloscénie
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-26 09:29:16+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=20.464410%2C-103.435696%2C17.91
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 11:15:51+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=chicken;h
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10053244797/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=chicken
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Loshu (2024-01-30 19:32:14+00:00): Dziękuję,  just a typo I think. I've removed it and added some more tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10053244797/history#map=19/53.42094/-2.33009&layers=P
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Adikso (2022-09-26 14:35:38+00:00): Kilka uwag: 
- Wasz serwis nie pojawi się na żadnej mapie używającej bazy OpenStreetMap, ponieważ nie ustawiliście "Rodzaj obiektu". 
W waszym przypadku będzie pasował "Punkt napraw sprzętu elektronicznego". Możecie też opcjonalnie dodać znaczniki "mobile_phone:repair=yes" i "computer:repair=yes", żeby łatwiej było ten serwis znaleźć.

- Gdy już wybierzecie odpowiedni rodzaj, to pokażą wam się pola typu adres, telefon, strona www, godziny otwarcia. Wypełnijcie to co jesteście w stanie. Zachęcam do uzupełnienia też informacji takich jak dostępność dla wózków inwalidzkich.

- Znacznik taki jak "it" nie istnieje i nie powinien być używany.

- Na OpenStreetMap jako "name" dajemy tylko nazwę. Jeżeli na drzwiach serwisu nie ma napisu "SmartService - naprawa telefonów i komputerów - akcesoria GSM" to powinno być zamiast tego po prostu "SmartService". Opis może być tak jak zrobiliście w description.
SmartService (2022-09-27 13:34:39+00:00): Dziękuję za uwagi. Poprawione. Pozdrawiam
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-26 09:47:14+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=40.515630%2C-78.369765%2C17.00
GinaroZ (2022-09-26 19:38:22+00:00): You had tagged this as a building so I've fixed it.
Also, what is your source for these pipeline markers you've been adding?
katzenfrett (2022-09-27 11:06:53+00:00): The more northerly ones (mostly I've tagged them source=survey) I've visited, the others are Google Street View as of now, but I'll visit them within the next weeks. Please let me know if there's a more accepted way of doing this (maybe as notes?). Thanks for fixing the building tag!
GinaroZ (2022-10-04 16:33:27+00:00): Ok - but we cannot use Google Street View as a source to add things to OSM, so you should wait until you've surveyed or have another acceptable source before adding.
In case you're not aware Bing Streetside imagery (and Mapillary) is available in the editor for use in OSM, so you might be able to confirm markers using it - for example: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=4baff3d5-2b8e-40ae-a48d-cac0101e2c7f&cp=56.216443~-2.887277&lvl=19&dir=345.34268&pi=-9.232215&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
katzenfrett (2022-10-04 18:54:37+00:00): Thank you! I wasn't aware of that.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
ma-rt-in (2022-09-29 11:49:20+00:00): Hallo,

heißt die XXL Panoramer Bank wirklich so? oder ist das eine Umschreibung?

vg
Pony1990 (2022-09-29 12:27:36+00:00): Hallo,
sie heißt so, es gibt auch wegweisende Schilder mit diesem Namen zu der Bank
ma-rt-in (2022-09-29 12:31:50+00:00): danke alles klar
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
jonrellim (2022-09-26 17:05:51+00:00): Hoi!

Je voegt een ambulancepost toe. Ik kom hier regelmatig langs maar kan met niet herinneren dat hier een ambulancepost is. Weet je zeker dat dit hier zit? Heb je hier een bron bij?
Router_01 (2022-09-29 13:49:08+00:00): Er zitten spandoeken op het pand.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
nathan_day (2022-09-26 10:15:06+00:00): If adding currency:XBT, you should probably remove payment:bitcoin as the later is a legacy tag.

Consider payment:onchain=yes if you know on-chain payments are accepted.
2FakTor (2022-09-26 10:37:02+00:00): I knew it, at this moment should be correct the complete profile of the node. I was trying to delete tages "currency:XBT=yes" or "payment:onchain" because in my opinion it was redundant, but this did not work for me, finally I reversed the changes. What do you think about the redundancy concept I detected?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
fkv (2022-09-26 10:50:41+00:00): Da ist jetzt eine Fläche ohne Tags übrig geblieben. Ist der Bogenschießplatz nur außer Betrieb (dann sollte er als leisure=pitch etc. getaggt bleiben) oder ist er ganz verschwunden (d.h. da ist nur noch Wiese - dann sollte Way 494707175 ganz gelöscht werden) ?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
literan (2022-09-26 17:16:51+00:00): именно что простая. Обычному транспорту там проезд закрыт https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CCUVvBWOxA

соответственно, значимость этой улицы минимальна. Статусы дорогам назначаются исходя из их роли в дорожной сети:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification

так что поправлю
Smollett (2022-10-02 07:47:54+00:00): Упс! motor_vehicle=no пропустил
Smollett (2022-10-02 07:48:53+00:00): А тогда это на service подходит
literan (2022-10-02 09:30:36+00:00): улица с адресацией по ней - поэтому unclass....
ygcgjp5 (2022-09-28 18:51:25+00:00): Sveiki, 
Matau keitėt tik juostas, bet jeigu pažįstate šį rajoną, galbūt galėtumete patikslinti greičio limitą? Žinau kad pradžioje būdavo „Zona 40“ ženklas, galbūt jis čia vis dar galioja? Greičio limitus patogu apžvelgti https://speed.openmap.lt/