piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tonyf1 (2017-04-23 06:45:05+00:00): Hi Ian. Welcome to OSM. Good to see you mapping. Its always worth searching wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki when unsure how to tag and you can always get help on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au Keep up your good work.
Ian TF (2017-04-23 06:55:01+00:00): Thanks,  I have also tried to relocate the off leash dog area in Kalinga to the new location.  I think I have messed it up a bit as the insertion does not look like other entries.  I am guessing you may be part of the local community in Brisbane.  Therefore you may know David Dean.  David is going to give a tutorial on OSM mapping to a group of us at the Royal Geographical Society of Qld in a few months so I am trying to come up to speed before that.    I have asked David if he can point me to a good tutorial on Open Street Map editing.
tonyf1 (2017-04-23 07:35:41+00:00): No I'm Melbourne. I presume the off leash area you created is Way: 488792552 . It doesnt have any tags and wont show on any map. I dont know how best to tag it, I would have to look at the wiki. The one you deleted a day ago was tagged barrier=fence and leisure=dog_park
eggie (2017-04-23 08:33:57+00:00): Het is niet de bedoeling om landuse grass te vervangen door Leisure park. Een park ligt geheel los over de landuse grass en natural water heen.
 Ook hoort Leisure nergens aan vast te plakken. Graag reactie
keithonearth (2023-11-28 04:52:08+00:00): Thanks for your edit! Your edit from 6 years ago made it much easier for me to find this hostel!
tonyf1 (2017-04-23 06:21:29+00:00): I am deleting this node because it does not represent anything on the ground. There are plenty of Whitsunday features which can be tagged tourism attractions if they are not already.
eggie (2017-04-23 10:38:21+00:00): Incorperated.. Ik zal hier de Leisure park losmaken van de wegen en proberen de landuse te herstellen. Je kunt gerust reageren als je vragen hebt.
user_5359 (2017-04-23 06:29:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rivers , too.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 16:09:26+00:00): no hay castillo aquí. eliminados.
user_5359 (2017-04-23 07:00:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the footway with the existing streets.
eggie (2017-04-23 08:35:16+00:00): Je geeft geen commentaar bij je changeset. Je bent toch hoop ik niet de landuse grass aan het vervangen door Leisure  park.
eggie (2017-04-23 08:59:51+00:00): 'k Zie dat Commodoortje al herstelwerkzaamheden heeft uitgevoerd in het Muzenpark.
Commodoortje (2017-04-23 10:27:33+00:00): Het is me niet opgevallen dat incorporated grass aan het omtaggen is naar park. Dit is namelijk niet de bedoeling.
Wel heb ik wat aanvullingen aan het park aangebracht.
@incorporated :
Kun je wat uitleg geven wat je bedoeling was/is
eggie (2017-04-23 11:07:28+00:00): Ik heb net het Laterna Magikapark hersteld. Al de wegen die geplakt zaten zoveel mogelijk losgemaakt, de landuse aangebracht en het hele park losgemaakt van de wegen. Rendering duurt even.
eggie (2017-04-23 11:08:20+00:00): Er zaten al veel fouten in van voorgaande mappers. Revert had geen zin en zo blijft de tag Leisure=park met naam instand.
Túllio (2017-05-10 22:36:12+00:00): Olá caro colega. Favor não usar caixa alta nas nomenclaturas. Não entendi o motivo de haver colocado um ponto "R E I T O R I A (4810812552, v1)" em local inadequado, já que se tratava do ICB.
user_5359 (2017-04-23 06:26:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add only the main type of building. You can divide the house in two building (one with building=house and one with building=garage), if you what two show the difference to the other buildings.
nammala (2017-04-26 06:38:21+00:00): Hi Наталия1993,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM) . May I know the lake you have added is present on the ground. Just asking coz I am not able to see in Imagery. 

Best Regards,
nammala
ElliottPlack (2021-10-14 12:28:53+00:00): Hi there. What was the Bike Maryland source for these LCN adds around College Park? I am a Bike Maryland member and do not recognize these edits. The link given does not resolve to any particular source.
nvk (2021-10-14 16:47:34+00:00): Hi ElliotPlack. 

My guess (this is a changeset from 4 years ago!) is it's from https://www.bikemaryland.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/041206.pdf which is the Mid-Maryland bike map (I also have an old print copy of this map around), but there are a few others listed on https://www.bikemaryland.org/resources/riding/maps/ like https://www.bikemaryland.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Anacostia-Trail-Map-2012.pdf.

I used to live in Hyattsville MD for near 10 years so a good bit of this is from #localknowledge, too. I'm former chair of the Hyattsville Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Committee.

Are their particular roads we should look at? Generally the overall network looks correct to me but happy to dig into any one in more detail.
ElliottPlack (2021-10-14 16:54:24+00:00): Awesome, thanks for you public service to the bicycling community! I should have said (in my original comment) that I didn't recognize these routes, not edits, sorry! I see them in the source you provided though and respect local knowledge over anything I could dig up anyhow.

My angle is trying to streamline the bicycle route network in the area and I'd wondered if any of these could possibly be moved on to the adjacent protected lanes in certain cases (like on Campus Drive.)
nvk (2021-10-15 17:46:42+00:00): I don't have strong opinions about which ways the relations wind their way thru, again my local knowledge is getting a little out of date. 

For College Drive there is a wide side path east of US Route 1 leading to the Metro station, is that what you mean?  That part of the road is pretty dangerous so makes sense to move the relation over to those ways.

Or in the main part of campus west of Route 1? I have less experience over there.

Generally road cyclists going on longer rides like to take roads not side trails and most route designations are on roads. /shrug
user_5359 (2017-04-23 07:06:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! In this country should the value of name and name:en the same. If you only add a tag name:en the name on the card doesn’t changed.
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-06 18:10:47+00:00): historic=citywalls appears to be the right tag here.
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-07 05:29:20+00:00): Fixed tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48466078
Stalker61 (2017-04-24 09:22:13+00:00): Откуда инфа?
На Бинге ничего нет!
oba510 (2017-04-23 07:48:10+00:00): It looks like you've set the default name (name=*) of this restaurant to "Greenburger's", and the English name (name:en=*) to "Nara". This doesn't make much sense. 

If the name of the restaurant changed you usually only need to change the name=* tag. The name:en=* tag is really only necessary if it has a name in English which is different from the default, and changing it doesn't change the default name.
Dalkvist (2017-04-23 09:51:38+00:00): Welcome to Openstreetmap!
Some tips/comments to help you get going: 

when doing things with square corners, like buildings, it is hard to get it perfect by hand. So the editor have a tool that does that for you, in ID it is the key “s” or the square icon in the popup menu when you select a way.

The bing aerial imagery is not very good in that area so try using the imagery from mapbox, right hand toolbar layers, but note that it is often a bit misaligned so you have to move it a bit to align with the gps traces[1].

When doing areas like farmland and forests it is discouraged to draw them on a road, it is better to draw the area border along the road or if the road goes through the area there is no need to split it at the road. 

If you have any questions feel free to message me, in Swedish if you prefer (your editor is in English).
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#iD
karozz (2017-04-23 11:05:09+00:00): Hej, Tack för tippsen och komentarerena, Eftersom jag är ny på detta, kan man byta layot kartan från Bint till hitta eftersom Bing inte har HD bilder över den ytan jag försoker ge mig på?
Dalkvist (2017-04-23 12:05:14+00:00): Se http://i.imgur.com/yzWvxbZ.jpg
1 klicka på layers i menyn
2 välj mapbox
3 visa gps spår
4 justera bakgrundsbilden så den stämmer med gps ståren
karozz (2017-04-24 10:48:59+00:00): Hej Igen
Tack.
punkt 4 du säger, justera bakgrundsbilden så den stämmer med GPS ståren (spåren?)
Vad menas, justera bakgrunden så den stämmer med vägarna?
Sorry men jag fattar inte riktig
Dalkvist (2017-04-24 11:18:55+00:00): Det finns inte så mycket gps spår i här men om du tittar åt lite öster där väg 502 ansluter till väg 55, i editorn med gps spår i bockat. Så ser du massa linjer under väg 55, de är gps spår som andra användare laddat upp, de lilla är södergående och gröna är norrgående och vägen är inritat i mitten av dem. Det borde också synas att vägen i mapbox ligger lite väster om gpsspåren så det är bäst att flytta den lite åt höger och ner. http://imgur.com/a/XhpkH
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:23:09+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
maraf24 (2017-04-23 13:34:06+00:00): Proszę nie zmieniać tych nazw. To są części miejscowość, a nie sama miejscowość.
vrmap (2021-01-29 12:27:06+00:00): Ciao Veronica,
in assenza di uno specifico divieto (es. cartello stradale) non si può mettere bicyle=no . Sono d’accordo che per le bici la strada è pericolosa ma non esiste nessun divieto per le bici. Ho tolto bicycle=no
woodpeck (2017-05-24 06:05:07+00:00): Hello 25or6to4, it appears that you're importing data from an NRHP data set in this and other similar change sets. Could you please ensure that the import is properly documented on the Wiki (I checked and at least it didn't seem obvious), and that you specify proper sources when making the edits? The edits in this changeset cannot possibly have come from the two sources you specified ("Texas Orthoimagery, Bing").
mavl (2018-12-25 21:19:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:47:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:17:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:45:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:57:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:49:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:32:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
geri-oc (2017-05-06 12:51:23+00:00): Wieso hast du das Hochmoor verändert?
Die Grenzen von GeoSN sind nicht aktuell. Vielleicht sollten die örtlichen Mapper genaueres beitragen als einfach landesweit etwas altes als neues einzutragen. Vor Ort wird um Ausweitung des Moorgebietes diskutiert - nicht aber um eine Verkleinerung.
Zur Info (nicht als Mappinggrundlage verwendbar):
http://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/umwelt/infosysteme/weboffice101/synserver?project=natur_natura2000_utm&view=nat2000&query=FFH&keyname=EU_NR&keyvalue=5248-305
geri-oc (2017-05-06 13:34:44+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=644858#p644858

falls du etwas zu dem "Massenedit" der Naturschutzgebiete sagen möchtest.

Grüße aus dem Osterzgebirge ...
mw67 (2017-05-06 14:11:54+00:00): Ich bin im Forum nicht registriert, deshalb hier. Mir wurde gesagt GeoSN darf offiziell als Quelle verwendet werden. Das ist der Stand. Wieso sollten die nicht aktuell sein? Was Du da oben anführst (Link) ist imho, die Grenze des FFH Gebietes, nicht die des NSG. siehe auch hier:
https://protectedplanet.net/9363
und hier: https://protectedplanet.net/555520624
streckenkundler (2017-05-06 15:18:55+00:00): In dem Fall hat mw67 recht. Hier ist das FFH-Gebiet bedeutend größer als das NSG. Vgl. Meinen Forenbeitrag.

@mw67: eine Forendisskussion zu diesem Thema ist besser, da das durchaus von allgemeingültigem Intersse ist.

Sven
geri-oc (2017-05-06 16:03:58+00:00): Moor:http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dmoor

Ein NSG-Schild steht / stand an der westlichen Kreuzung Lugsteinweg am südlich abgehenden track.
mw67 (2017-05-06 16:17:51+00:00): Ein Schild hat keine Rechtskraft, entscheidend ist die Verordnung.
streckenkundler (2017-05-07 09:09:48+00:00): Die Beschilderung wird gerne an den Stellen angebracht, wo sie publikumswirksam ist, nicht immer da, wo sie reale Grenze liegt. In meinen Augen ist aber die reale Grenze maßgebend. Aber ein NSG nach der vorhandenen Beschilderung erfassen zu wollen, ist in meinen Augen nicht möglich. Was Grenzen anbelangt, sollten Primär die Verordnungstexte herhalten. Das o.g. NSG ist allerdings ein "Alt-"NSG, ausgewiesen 1961. In solchen Fällen vertraue ich auch eher der Grenze auf der Karte. 

Weitere Erläuterung siehe Forum.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:46:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Dalkvist (2017-04-23 09:26:53+00:00): Hi nice to see more people helping to make the map better. 

Some tips: when doing things with square corners, like buildings, it is hard to get it perfect by hand. So the editor have a tool that does that for you, in ID it is the key “s” or the square icon in the popup menu when you select a way.
Not all green areas are best described as parks, for grass you can use landcover=grass. Similarly not all trees are forests/woods, areas with trees in parks and residential areas can be tagged as landcover=trees and individual trees with natural=tree.

If you have any questions feel free to message me, in Swedish if you prefer (your editor is in English).
user_5359 (2017-04-23 08:47:48+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Die Schönheitssalon soll den Namen "Eddies Schenke“ haben?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:59:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:17:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
hsimpson (2018-04-11 15:52:16+00:00): Hi Chrossom,
ich würde dich gerne bitten, dich nochmal genau mit dem Thema path und designated auseinander zu setzen!
-
Eine kleine Übersicht würde ich dir gerne hier geben, falls du dann noch fragen hast, schu mal im Wiki nach oder komm gerne auf mich zurück:
-
* designated bedeutet, dass der Weg durch ein (in D blaues) schild alleine der bezeichneten Nutzergruppe ausgewiesen ist.
-
highway=footway und highway=cycleway sind gleichbedeutend mit highway=path + foot=designated, bzw. bicycle=designated
-
* Viele Parkwege haben keinerlei Beschilderung. Dann gibt es auch keine besonderen Zutrittsgebote und der Weg ist daher als reiner highway=path zu kennzeichnen, welcher für foot und bicycle ein yes impliziert.
-
Ich würde dich bitten, dieses und deine anderen Changesets nochmal genau auf diese Themen hin zu überprüfen, da sich mir beim groben betrachten einige inkonsistenzen offenart haben.
-
Bitte beachte auch, dass die Sichbarkeit auf irgendwelchen Karten keinerlei Kriterium ist, bestimmte Schlüssel zu nutzen oder nicht! Das gilt auch für die Standartkarte aif osm.org.
-
Gut ausgebaute Wege kann man den Routern viel besser durch Schlüssel wie surface=*; width=*; smoothness=* und tracktype=* schmackhaft machen.
-
Viele Grüße,
hsimpson
hsimpson (2018-04-11 15:53:40+00:00): Edit: Die zuletzt genannten Schlüssel wirken sich sogar auch auf die Darstellung in der Hauptkarte aus.
Viele Grüße
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-04-23 08:15:56+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48052684\
Je mag niet twee landuse over elkaar heen leggen. landuse=forest is tag die gebruikelijk is. natural=wood mag niet meer. Er lig nu een natural=wood dwars over de landuse=forest Ouide 3dshapes.
Zal zo met de laatste luchtfoto kijken. Die zit dus ook in editor Josm ..kadaster pdok 
Ook een reden om over te stappen. Bing is veelal uit 2011. En hier is heel veel veranderd met de nieuwe loop van de Molenbeek.
eggie (2017-04-23 08:17:46+00:00): Een rij bomen tag je op een way  als natural=tree_row
losse bomen als natural_tree op een node.
Je kunt zelfs per boom aangeven soort, hoogte .. Het gaat heel ver. Zie de wiki over "tree"
eggie (2017-04-23 08:21:01+00:00): Haal dat natural=wood maar helemaal weg.
eggie (2017-04-23 08:26:34+00:00): .. en pas de 3dshapes gewoon aan. Verander daarna de source in source=bing of survey
De vorm op zich is goed, maar het mag dus niet over elkaar liggen. Het pad kun je vrijlaten.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2018-05-05 18:28:36+00:00): Nu edit in Nederland.. daarom.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:31:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Rudolf Mayer (2017-04-28 11:03:48+00:00): Thanks for your edits; however, you added some duplicated ways to mark the bridges, instead of splitting the way and adding the bridge=yes part to the respective segments
Furth, you marked the newly added segments as completed, not as construction=
Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48224628
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:15:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Rudolf Mayer (2017-04-28 11:03:44+00:00): Thanks for your edits; however, you added some duplicated ways to mark the bridges, instead of splitting the way and adding the bridge=yes part to the respective segments
Furth, you marked the newly added segments as completed, not as construction=
Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48224628
woodpeck_repair (2017-04-23 08:21:56+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 48005343, 48048355.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
piligab (2018-02-23 22:15:54+00:00): Hi Kazeem
Thank you for your contribution on OSM, I notice you added more transformers and lines, is it correct?
Regards.
Pilar.
eggie (2017-04-23 09:23:50+00:00): Nee.. landuse is eigenlijk niet zo geschikt voor startende mappers. Nu ligt hier ook natural=wood over de oude landuse=forest heen. Weg er mee... :)
Die paadjes zijn wel allemaal gelukt.
eggie (2017-04-23 09:26:52+00:00): natural=wood dat overblijft na verwijderen netjes aansluiten aan het water en veranderen in landuse=forest. Kwestie van volhouden en af en toe je neus stoten. :)
eggie (2017-04-23 09:20:52+00:00): Hoi.. Is de geografische naam echt de Blauwe speeltuin. Anders beter de naam  weglaten. Veel zaken in een wijk krijgen natuurlijk vanzelf een naam. Iedereen heeft het bij mij in de wijk over "De koe en de stier", (kuststof koeien) maar zo heet het natuurlijk niet.
Supaplex (2017-04-23 13:00:39+00:00): 有名字嗎？
Kostik (2017-04-23 10:08:38+00:00): Löschen Sie nicht 6134725
sebastic (2017-04-23 11:18:42+00:00): Please give these relations proper tags so that they don't qualify as old-style multipolygons.
Kostik (2017-04-23 14:39:45+00:00): Before removing something, a good tone to write to the author of editing.