piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-01-08 11:13:34+00:00): Hello Max 2006,
You asked for a review.
I am sorry to say , but your mappings are below par. 
The issues are summarized here and the explanation can be found on attached document
A; Inaccurate mappings ,
C: Connected nodes.
E: Not squared buildings, (the majority is fair rectangular)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
osmviborg (2021-01-04 17:12:43+00:00): Det er den lokale kommune der bestemmer hvor adresserne skal placeres. Undlad at flytte på dem. Denne bliver flyttet tilbage automatisk.
eggie (2021-01-04 16:58:44+00:00): Beste Oosterhagen. De gebouwen zaten nu wat in de knoop. Ik heb dat hersteld naar de data van de BGT omtrekgericht
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2021-01-04 17:05:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seamark:type
seamark:harbour:category=marina

Weet je dat zeker? Beet je ongebruikelijk voor een leisure=marina
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dmarina

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2021-01-04 17:49:51+00:00): Je tagging is overigens in orde. Even een medemapper van openseamap laten kijken.
Mvg
Eggie
LorenzoPesci (2021-01-05 16:00:02+00:00): Il nome Cavatappi 4 per il sentiero è di uso comune?
Se è una invenzione di qualcuno va rimosso
PLima785 (2021-01-04 17:40:48+00:00): Tenho que tirar o chapéu, bela iniciativa de cartografar os edifícios nesta zona com o iD.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:22:51+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Anton Khorev (2021-01-06 21:50:59+00:00): Hello.

Recently you along with other users were editing this road:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885527284

In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much:  
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/885527284

Can you explain the purpose of these edits?

Best regards  
Anton Khorev  
Data Working Group
paper1992 (2021-01-07 06:02:42+00:00): Hello
My friends and I tried to do some edits by AI and we failed. Then we reversed the edits.
This will not happen again.
Shaun das Schaf (2021-01-05 19:01:58+00:00): Hello magotar,

is this a special building or why does it have its own name?

Best regards
Shaun das Schaf
Polarbear-repair (2023-04-02 21:45:37+00:00): Reverted by #134430621,
implausible name, unexplained. 

DWG ticket
Ticket#2023040210000052
blackboxlogic (2021-01-04 23:32:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I've reviewed your first few edits and they look great! Please ask if you have questions.
-Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96922890
martindemling (2021-01-04 21:19:11+00:00): Hi ThFenske, welcome to OSM!

I have a few issues with that changeset:
- it does not have a comment (like e.g. what was done or the data source).
- it spans from Berlin to somewhere in Africa (and the edits have nothing in common, please consider splitting them the next time)
- the deletion of the McPaper shop was intentional? According to Google it still exists... Please just give a quick reply if this deletion is ok (I cant tell since you gave no changeset comment)
martindemling (2021-01-08 13:28:11+00:00): I saw that MacPaper moved its location and now is located within a shopping center nearby. I undeleted it and moved it near to its new location in changeset 97172918.
ThFenske (2021-01-08 13:41:13+00:00): Hi Martin,
Sorry for these obviously confusing changes. I’m new to OSM and the App Go Map!!. I browsed through known places and made changes to POIs I know.
I will split them innige future. And I have to figure out, how Ronald comments with the used App.

The mentioned McPaper store in my neighbourhood in Berlin closed long time ago.

Regards

Thomas
ThFenske (2021-01-08 13:44:16+00:00): Concerning the McPaper store. You are right. There is another store in a nearby shopping centre. They existed both for some years.
martindemling (2021-01-10 12:52:59+00:00): Hello Thomas, thanks for your reply and your info about the McPaper stores (I'm not local to that area). To be perfectly honest I don't know if moving the node was then the best solution in this case (instead of creating a new one).
Regarding the changesets: IDK how this works in GoMap, but I for sure created a few strange / big changesets in the beginning :)

I wish you fun contributing further! 
Regards, Martin
AntMadeira (2021-01-04 20:01:33+00:00): Olá, maplander.
Espero encontrar-te bem.

Reparei que andas a mapear vários cursos de água que são ribeiras e a etiquetá-las como rios. Alterei esses casos na região entre Proença-a-Nova e Vila velha de Ródão, mas pergunto: há algum motivo para mapeares uma ribeira como rio?


Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
dx125 (2021-01-04 18:57:55+00:00): Hallo DonRon82,
und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Du hast heute in bisher 8 Änderungssätzen insgesamt 440 Punkte, meist von Gebäuden verschoben.
Bitte bedenke, dass Deine Änderungen nach dem Hoch-Laden sofort sichtbar werden! Soweit ich beim flüchtigen Drüber-Schauen gesehen habe, hast Du wohl versucht, einen Lage-Versatz der Gebäude zum Luftbild auszugleichen.
ABER, dass von Dir als Hintergrund verwendete Bing - Luftbild ist selbst so schlecht ausgerichtet, dass man es in die richtige Position verschieben müsste, bevor man  d a n a c h  anfängt Gebäude zu positionieren. 
Man richtet normalerweise schlecht ausgerichtete Luftbilder vor dem Editieren nach vorhandenen GPS-Spuren aus, wenn man so etwas vor hat.
Oder man verschiebt das Luftbild so, dass es mit den schon gezeichneten Objekten weitgehend übereinstimmt oder man nimmt ein Luftbild, welches standardmäßig gut ausgerichtet ist. 
Das kannst Du als Neuling nicht wissen. 
Du hast jetzt einige Gebäude viel zu stark verschoben, über Wege hinweg teilweise.
Kannst Du bitte erst mal aufhören zu editieren, und Dir die ganze Sache nochmal anschauen?
Wenn Du Fragen hast, kannst Du hier antworten.
Mein Vorschlag wäre, erst einmal alles in den ursprünglichen Zustand zurück zu setzen.
Dann kannst Du die Sache als Übung abhaken, es ist kein Schaden entstanden und Du machst bei Gelegenheit  vorsichtiger weiter ;-) 
Viele Grüße
dx125 (2021-01-11 18:41:47+00:00): keine Reaktion des Users, Changesets reverted
syntex (2021-05-29 18:49:24+00:00): Nie nadawaj typów budynków "na siłę", bo często nadajesz je błędnie
Frans S (2021-01-08 11:40:35+00:00): Hello Noéh.
You asked for a review.
I am sorry to say , but your mappings are below par.
The issues are summarized here and the explanation can be found on attached document
A; Inaccurate mappings ,
E: Not squared buildings, (the majority is fair rectangular)

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Vinber-Pro (2021-01-05 10:16:51+00:00): Bonjour,
plutôt "Impasse de la Pinède" avec la majuscule à pinède / https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Toponymes,_odonymes#Majuscules.2C_minuscules_et_trait_d.27union
à plus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96923597
isabelle burosse (2021-01-05 10:29:07+00:00): Bonjour Vincent, merci pour ton aide ;) A plus.
ivanbranco (2021-01-06 12:02:30+00:00): Hi Irving,

diet:小火鍋=yes is not a valid tag, by convention all osm tags are in english. Can you fix it?
valsily (2021-01-06 14:32:41+00:00): Hi,
My apologies. I have removed the invalid value. Thanks for letting me know.
Irving
SHARCRASH (2021-01-17 12:02:30+00:00): Bonjour et bonne année! A propos de ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891983109 il est typé grade2 mais sur le coté Ouest il rejoint un grade3 et du coté Est un chemin avec pas mal d'herbe à la vue des photos de 2019 (donc grade4 je dirai) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528334397 . Cela me semble illogique car généralement les chemins les plus structurés d'un revêtement sont moins importants au fur et à mesure qu'on s'enfonce dans des zones naturelles. Avoir un portion plus revêtue au milieu entre 2 autres moins revêtues est très rare sauf cas exceptionnel pour un raison précise. Si on continue vers l'Est, on atteint tout de même une zone urbaine et donc je me dis qu'il est probable que le chemin continue en grade2 jusque là bas? Pourriez-vous m'en dire plus, s'il vous plait?
indeko (2021-01-18 07:56:01+00:00): Bonjour,
Une parti des chemins dans cette forêt ont été refaits en 2020 avec le but d'être carrossable pour camions semi-remorques, pour l'évacuation du bois. Dans leur état actuel, ils sont en principe carrossable pour des voitures normales et evt bicyclettes de ville, même en état humide. Le chemin 891983109 à subit une forte amélioration vu sont ancien état. Selon ma compréhension je dirais plutôt grade 2 que 3. Moi je pense même qu'il faut changer le chemin à l'ouest en grade 2 comme il a été aussi refait. Mais cet état peut de nouveau changer avec les années! Le chemin à l'est et la parti dans forêt, jonction vers N8 sont de grade 4. Il y a depuis 2 ans des travaux sur un grand nombre de chemins forestiers qui sont pas encore achevés.
Mes meilleures salutations
SHARCRASH (2021-01-18 13:55:52+00:00): En effet, beaucoup de chemins forestiers ont été refaits l'année dernière à l'Ouest de Saeul. Si vous dites que le chemin à l'Ouest a également été refait, avant c'était clairement un grade3 et que vous suggérez que c'est un grade2, cela me semble tout à fait logique maintenant pour le chemin 891983109. Je l'ai changé en grade2 alors. Pour le chemin à l'extrême Est, j'y suis passé hier soir mais trop tard, il faisait trop sombre et pas moyen de s'arrêter direct sur le bord de la route donc j'ai juste jeté un coup d'oeil et il m'a semblé être un grade3 mais à confirmer plus sérieusement, je repasserai. 

Merci pour toutes vos réponses!
Vinber-Pro (2021-01-05 10:13:02+00:00): Salut,
dans le commentaire, peux tu préciser par exemple changement nom de rue (modif, difficile de savoir à quoi cela fait référence :) )
à plus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96923712
Heinz_V (2021-01-05 07:44:33+00:00): Please give the exact source for the Narnaul outer ring road and the NH148B-moterway part. In the meantime I set these  roads to proposed.
Iamjayesharma (2021-01-05 09:02:52+00:00): This ring road is under construction and nearly on completion as this map is not updated. And, 148B motorway is already completed. You can see in Google Maps as their map photos are updated in August.
Heinz_V (2021-01-05 18:53:09+00:00): In Maxar the Bypass is to be seen; it is a trunk; The ring road should remain proposed, till the construction really started; Google is not a valid source!!!
Iamjayesharma (2021-01-06 07:25:55+00:00): Actual construction is already started, I know this because I live in the same city.
Heinz_V (2021-01-06 08:26:08+00:00): OK,  then I revert my changes
Frans S (2021-01-07 12:04:04+00:00): Hello Lottie. Welcome to HOTOSM
Just a small remark about your mappings
Please do not tag a road crossing as a crossing, Just connect nodes of a highway.
Best regards
GeorgeKaplan (2021-01-04 21:59:44+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de ne pas envoyer de modifications farfelues dans OpenStreetMap.

George
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96924814
Vinber-Pro (2021-01-05 10:04:00+00:00): Bonjour Denis,
je n'ai pas compris pourquoi tu as effacé l'hotel ? il n'est pas là ? et il n'y a plus de trace de l'hotel dans OSM ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96924897
Frans S (2021-01-08 11:46:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
C: Collecting multiple buildings ,mapped as 1 building
E: Most buildings not squared
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96925045
Frans S (2021-01-07 16:11:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .
Please square the rectangular buildings you map,
See this document for more info about how to map
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
trigpoint (2021-01-04 17:59:33+00:00): Bore da, thank you for your edit. However 62m is rather tall for a house  in that part of Wales. Are you sure it isn't meant to be addr:housenumber.

Diolch Phil
Mike_Z50 (2021-01-04 18:04:35+00:00): Hi Phil,
I assumed height to be elevation. Removed now pending correct measurement. Diolch, Mike
trigpoint (2021-01-04 18:16:58+00:00): No problem. There is an ele tag for elevation, although it is not used very often as data consumers can work that out from open elevation data.

Diolch Phil
Frans S (2021-01-08 13:00:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here  .
I reviewed your work and have some remarks on your mappings.
I summarize them here. The explanation can be found on attached document
A; inaccurate mapping.
C: collect multiple buildings
E: Buildings not squared
F: Mapping buildings partly covered by trees
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
ivanbranco (2021-01-06 12:03:54+00:00): Hi Bert Araali,

I think there's a problem with the tag name=* in this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167658128/
Bert Araali (2021-01-06 16:12:47+00:00): True, copy paste mistake. Corrected it. Thanks for the help.
Chivos (2021-01-05 12:53:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Les travaux du métro sont effectivement terminés, cependant l'emprise n'est pas libérée et les travaux d'extension du parc sont toujours en cours...
Furdrien (2021-01-05 15:54:58+00:00): Bonjour, 
La ligne de PSL à Poissy (avec la ref 340 000) n'existe pas. La relation que vous avez créé est fausse.
De plus les membres de la relation font déjà partie des lignes :
- De PSL à Saint-Germain
- De Nanterre-U à Sartrouville
- De PSL au Havre
Korgi1 (2021-01-05 05:17:19+00:00): Hey MatzeM,

Is there a reason this changeset is so large? I assume you might have done a cross-country trip and had auto-upload off on StreetComplete but just making sure.

Thanks,
Korgi1.
MatzeM (2021-01-14 08:22:29+00:00): I used the android app "Street Complete". You can't specify a changeset within this app, just answer questions.
MatzeM (2021-01-14 08:25:00+00:00): I had been in the US many years ago and made the changes after watching some old photos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-15 23:58:03+00:00): Edit was reverted as based on guessing,not on survey.

Please do not use StreetComplete for guess-based editing.

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2021-January/020813.html

Certainly not safe to assume this. Offhand cobblestone, brick, and
concrete are pretty easy to find. I wouldn't be surprised to find gravel
or compacted roads in the outer parts of the outer boroughs.

Famously there's still one dirt "road" in Manhattan (actually an
alley... with too many access tags, it seems)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386951769
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-05 08:21:58+00:00): What is the source of this edit? And https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96578429#map=19/25.13103/55.15251 (in Dubai) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96620330#map=10/52.5183/10.6581 (in Germany), both 7 days ago?

Have you verified this by survey?
MatzeM (2021-01-14 08:27:42+00:00): I had been in the US many years ago and made the changes after watching some old photos.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-15 21:04:53+00:00): Please do not use StreetComplete for guess-based editing.

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2021-January/020813.html

Certainly not safe to assume this. Offhand cobblestone, brick, and
concrete are pretty easy to find. I wouldn't be surprised to find gravel
or compacted roads in the outer parts of the outer boroughs.

Famously there's still one dirt "road" in Manhattan (actually an
alley... with too many access tags, it seems)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386951769
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-15 23:42:52+00:00): This edit was reverted as guessing.
M!dgard (2021-01-04 21:13:56+00:00): Dit is niet hoe je een mast mapt.
M!dgard (2021-01-04 21:14:06+00:00): Kun je die verbeteren?
M!dgard (2021-01-04 21:15:10+00:00): Er staat ook een node naast die geïmporteerd is uit het BIPT. Die moet gemerged worden met deze mast. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikiproject_Belgium/Infrastructure/BIPT_antennas
wegspotter (2021-01-15 17:06:11+00:00): Zo goed?
M!dgard (2021-01-16 02:34:56+00:00): Eigenlijk worden masten niet als area gedaan maar als node. Als het grondoppervlak significant is, houdt een area misschien ook steek.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast

Voor de tagging is de telecom=antenna niet van toepassing aangezien er al man_made=mast, communication:mobile_phone=yes is.

Ik zou ook zeggen dat een mast geen building=yes is, het is geen gebouw.
wegspotter (2021-01-28 18:56:49+00:00): Kwam als een fixme uit het GRB, dus ik heb wat overgenomen. Pas gerust de tags aan, zo leer ik er wat van!
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-15 23:47:10+00:00): Reverted as blind guesses, not based on survey (despite StreetComplete requesting this)

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96926700
FraukeLeo (2021-08-08 14:35:14+00:00): Hallo Egenrother Radler, du hast hier einige kleine Fahrwege als highway=footway erfasst. highway=footway ist eigentlich ein reiner Fußweg, also ausschließlich zu Fuß nutzbar. Da steht dann üblicherweise der blaue "Lolli" mit dem Fußgängersymbol dran. Radfahren und Reiten ist auf einem highway=footway verboten.

Das scheint mir hier nicht der Fall zu sein, das sind für mich ganz normale highway=track mit tracktype=grade5 (d.h. völlig unbefestigt).

Schau mal unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
hauke-stieler (2021-01-14 20:37:32+00:00): Hi,

beim Samitätshaus Seidel hast du einige falsche Tags eingetragen: air_conditioning, opening_hours und website waren falsch.
Der Nutzer Josef73 hat da schon nachgebessert und ich habe gerade auch noch etwas korrigiert. Nächstes mal vorm hochladen noch mal rüber schauen ;)

Grüße
Hauke
czubi (2021-01-04 18:32:05+00:00): kein Eigenname
czubi (2021-01-04 18:32:30+00:00): kein Eigenname
Jacques Lavignotte (2021-01-04 21:22:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dbakery

Usez et abusez du Wiki !

J.
Jacques Lavignotte (2021-01-04 21:18:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de contribuer à OSM.

Pour indiquer un restaurant lisez ceci :
 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant

Un bar : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbar

Pour dire les deux, posez deux POI, l'un pour le bar, l'autre pour le restaurant.

Amicalement,   Jacques

ps : continuez !
DeFra85 (2022-03-09 11:37:31+00:00): Hey, existiert der "LBM Bikers Outfit" in der Lange Straße 4 in Steinhagen wirklich. Auf der Homepage ist der Store in Bielefeld auf der Eckendorfer.

Oder hast du dich damals mit Zweirad Coors vertan? Denn die haben wohl auch Klamotten von denen.
Edelsalami (2022-03-09 16:43:09+00:00): Tag, das kann ich dir nicht sagen. Ich hatte lediglich die POI-Attribute dem Gebäude entnommen und als Punkt hinzugefügt. HTH
DeFra85 (2022-03-14 08:29:12+00:00): Okay
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-15 20:14:08+00:00): שלום, מיפיתם כאן מוסך משאיות כבית חולים. תיקנתי ב- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166322483
fjavier_gr (2021-01-05 13:09:13+00:00): Hola,

¿Ya se puede circular por esa vía?

Saludos.
id037 (2021-01-05 18:08:27+00:00): Hola, se abrió el 21 de diciembre según esta noticia:

https://www.elnortedecastilla.es/palencia/variante-aligerara-trafico-20201222231636-nt.html
fjavier_gr (2021-01-05 18:33:11+00:00): Gracias por la respuesta, lo miré hace poco tiempo (1 o 1,5 meses) y me había extrañado que tan rápido hubiera cambios. Un saludo.
Flurps (2021-01-28 19:53:00+00:00): Hi there and thanks for the change!

For the requested review: The road portion was all fine. Not sure if they should really be residential roads or not, but seems fine for the area.

The park should likely just be a playground with no name (unless it has a name!). You can add a description/ages/access if needed too.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96929321
iandees (2021-01-04 19:52:11+00:00): Hello. Why did you delete this house? All the imagery seems to show that the house and driveway are still there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96929528
clay_c (2021-01-04 20:27:46+00:00): The area also looks wooded, which may be a better match for natural=wood instead of landuse=grass. How come the buildings are deleted?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96929528
kylebakerpa05 (2021-01-05 12:55:42+00:00): Well I’m sorry I made a mistake the offended you all so much lmao. I thought that house was demolished along with the part of the land above.
Felipe Alves (2021-01-05 17:09:40+00:00): Oi, Robson. Td bem?
Vi que adicionou uma descrição na etiqueta de nome da casa. Retirei do nome e passei para descrição - para não perder a informação - mas acho que é um dado que não deve ser deixado público. Imagino que seja a casa da sua família, nesse caso deixo para vc decidir. Caso não seja, acho interessante apagar essa informação.
Abs
Robson_Juaçaba (2021-01-05 17:23:23+00:00): Obrigado pelo auxilio e a luz amiga.
Sou iniciante e estou aprendendo a colaborar com o OSM.
Espero conseguir colaborar com todos, grato,
Robson Juacaba
Téc. Agrimensura
eggie (2021-01-04 20:29:39+00:00): Dag Fred,
Tip:
Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2021-01-04 20:33:18+00:00): De info heb ik even zelf samengevoegd net de bestaande adresnode.
gr eggie
Cartographer10 (2021-01-04 19:35:36+00:00): Ook nog karzerneplein als voetgangersvlak toegevoegd.
StefanHRT (2021-01-23 13:32:29+00:00): Hallo,
Da Pfade ja auch eine Radfreigabe beinhalten, sind die Wege mit dem Rad befahrbar oder zählt das Gebiet gar unter eine geschützte Grünanlage? Gruß
czubi (2021-01-05 15:14:04+00:00): Hallo Jonas, da hast du gleich an einer schwierigen Stelle bekonnen mit dem ändern. Das ganze Objekt hatte schon einen namen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69357710
und das sports_centre ist an den Gebäuden nicht ganz falsch aber auch nicht optimal. Besser wäre es gewesen den ganzen Komplex so einzufassen.Das building=yes hier wegzumachen war verkehrt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69357710
ist aber auch eine schwierige Stelle
czubi (2021-01-05 15:15:48+00:00): sorry hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31059939
czubi (2021-01-05 15:22:56+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.9623072&lon=11.0345187&zoom=19&camera.theta=62.493&camera.phi=-105.997
literan (2021-01-08 16:10:29+00:00): Все нормально, вроде бы, спасибо за ваш вклад!
sheldonelectric (2023-12-04 11:44:27+00:00): Hey _Mathis, why did you tag this bicycle parking as a charging station? I don't see any shuko there.
_Mathis (2023-12-04 14:10:23+00:00): As far as I remember, there was a locker with boxes for charging bicycle batteries. Could have been removed since.
sheldonelectric (2023-12-04 14:15:14+00:00): Thanks for your comment, indeed the locker doesn't exists anymore.