piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-14 15:11:40+00:00): Ein Tag agriculture=yes existiert nicht. Gemeint ist wahrscheinlich agricultural.
Aber: auch das ist vermutlich falsch, da agricultural=yes dem Traktor frei entspricht. Landw. Verkehr frei ist Access=agricultural. Häufig besser motor_vehicle=agricultural. Bitte um Korrektur.
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-14 15:13:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59409523/
highflyer74 (2018-01-10 08:32:10+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Hier sind ein paar Punkte (Nodes), die mit building=yes attributiert sind. Das passt nicht ganz, da das Gebäude ja als Fläche abgebildet ist. Wenn ein Gebäude abgerissen wurde, aber noch auf den Luftbildern zu sehen ist, werden die Gebäude (also der Umriss) nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix getaggt. Erst, wenn sie auf keinem Luftbild mehr auftauchen, löscht man das Gebäude.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
chnav (2018-01-20 12:40:29+00:00): Пожалуйста не помечайте residential места, где нет жилых зданий.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
chnav (2018-01-09 18:27:03+00:00): Здравствуйте, зачем создавать отношение для полигона ? Мультиполигоны использутся совершенно иначе. Пожалуйста не делайте так больше.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
opendcc (2018-01-10 13:17:43+00:00): Hallo,

das Burghauser Wappen ist doch kein eigenständiges Kunstwerk - das ist doch das Wappen am Stadthaus dran, oder?
DD1GJ (2018-01-10 16:04:49+00:00): @opendcc: siehe Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55309520
viloan (2018-01-09 14:26:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-01-09 16:17:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
tolioalessandro (2020-04-14 19:51:02+00:00): Queste modifiche da lei apportate contengono un errore, una parte del territorio comunale di Cartigliano è confluito nel Comune di Rosà. Precisamente in località Scalchi.
tolioalessandro (2020-04-14 19:51:31+00:00): Provvedo a correggere
Davide_sd (2020-04-14 20:07:39+00:00): Ciao Alessandro. Confermo, appena controllato il databse regionale. Si assicuri di non danneggiare le diverse relazioni "boundary" per i diversi comuni (Tezze sul Brenta, Cartigliano, Rosà).
tolioalessandro (2020-04-14 20:35:15+00:00): Ho già apportato le modifiche, se vuole controllare anche lei quattro occhi sono meglio di due. Buona serata!
Davide_sd (2020-04-14 21:03:08+00:00): Controllato! Tutto ok. Buona serata!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
R0bst3r (2018-01-10 18:49:25+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55294745
R0bst3r (2018-01-10 18:51:10+00:00): Hallo HHES8,
eine Behindertenparkplatz kann man so erfassen. Für einzelne Parkplätze gibt es noch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space
Ich habe nun zusätzlich noch Tags für Behinderte hinzugefügt.
Viele Grüße
highflyer74 (2018-01-10 08:36:04+00:00): Ebenso hier. Bitte keine Punkte in das Gebäude setzen, sondern das Gebäude selbst mit demolished:building=yes versehen. Beim Tagging (also dem Attributieren von Objekten) nur Tags nutzen, die im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page dokumentiert sind. Vielleicht kannst Du Deine Edits noch einmal durchschauen, und die Dinge entsprechend anpassen.
GilB (2018-01-09 18:43:34+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55295175
eggie (2018-01-09 15:41:25+00:00): Welkom bij OSM en waarschuwing per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

een Leisure park is geen  vervanging vor de echte landuse zoals grass, forest en tree.
ook plak je het park aan het gebouw met nr 207 vast. Dat is niet gewenst.
eggie (2018-01-09 16:13:42+00:00): parkedit verwijderd en lsgemaakt. Leisure grass omgezet in landuse grass
Je kunt weer mappen. Ga je svp goed inlezen. Parkedits liggen onder een vergrootglas. Editor iD plakt erg snel dus goed inzoomen.
eggie (2018-01-09 16:16:14+00:00): Middels PB contact gehad.
R0bst3r (2018-01-10 18:38:30+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55295394
Gh0stz0x (2018-01-09 15:24:12+00:00): Scrivere in lettere maiuscole equivale ad urlare. Si prega di rispettare la Niquette. Grazie
Alessandro Sgambati (2018-01-09 15:44:19+00:00): Grazie Andreas!
Il richiamo alla buona educazione potrebbe sembrare opportuno. Tuttavia penso che questa volta sia ampiamente fuori luogo. Mi pare di aver già cancellato la linea in questione. Purtroppo è ricomparsa. Visto che la ricognizione del territorio e la cura che uso da anni nel riportare i dati in OSM hanno comunque un costo, almeno in termini di tempo ed energie, mi preoccupo che la variazione sia verificata ed accettata definitivamente dal sistema OSM. L'uso delle maiuscole è giustificato dalla necessità di evidenziare una variazione già riportata. Se ti danno tanto fastidio una decina di lettere maiuscole, considera che a me dà ancor più fastidio ripetere un lavoro già fatto.
Cari saluti e buona mappatura!
Alessandro Sgambati
Gh0stz0x (2018-01-09 15:48:25+00:00): Alessandro, comprendo la tua frustrazione, ma non è commentando a lettere maiuscole che risolvi il problema. Ora provo a vedere dalla cronologia chi imperterrito continua a rimettere la linea. Probabilmente è reinserita perché vengono usate ortofoto vecchie. Ora guardo.
Gh0stz0x (2018-01-09 16:11:54+00:00): Devo guardare da PC. Così poi contatto l'autore e vediamo.
Cascafico (2018-01-09 18:29:18+00:00): A me sembra che se è stato ri-aggiuto qulacosa nella way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378216829  è stato fatto 2 ani fa
R0bst3r (2018-01-10 18:34:28+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55295534
R0bst3r (2018-01-10 18:38:25+00:00): Hallo Jombo,
der Punkt hat jetzt nur einen source Tag, es wird aber nicht mit Eigenschaften, sogenannten Tags beschrieben was dort ist, ein Changesetkommentar reicht dafür nicht.
Deinem Kommentar nach empfehle ich dir dich hier einzulesen und dich dann nochmals zu versuchen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint
Viele Grüße
geri-oc (2018-01-20 08:35:52+00:00): Bitte einmal im WIKI lesen:
maxspeed:type=* sollte source:maxspeed=*
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:source:maxspeed
Wenn kein Fahrradweg vorhanden ist brauche ich auch nicht cycleway=no einzutragen.
"Wir tragen das ein, was wir vor Ort sehen."
Gruß Gerd
viloan (2018-01-09 15:02:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-09 15:49:54+00:00): Dit zou wel een goede manier zijn om een park te mappen. , maar dan wel helemaal los en zonder te plakken.
eggie (2018-01-09 16:10:05+00:00): Het park heb ik losgemaakt. Je zou de landuse kunnen invullen . Als voorbeelden heb ik wat toegevoegd natural=tree  en tree_row en wat grass
mavl (2018-12-25 00:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-09 15:48:37+00:00): Marc... hoe ziet het er in werkelijkheid uit. Hier is geen sprake van een park. het Vondelpark in A'dam is een park of het Sporpark.
eggie (2018-01-09 16:05:35+00:00): aangepast naar landuse_village_green
juminet (2018-01-10 14:20:23+00:00): Bonjour Correcaminos, 

Il semble que tu as bougé 2 noeuds de la N4 lors de ton dernier changement! Regardes-y car des voitures autonomes pourraient être forcée de contourner Metzert à travers champs !! ;-)
Correcaminos604 (2018-01-10 15:59:05+00:00): Benh ça alors, une horreur! La souris qui a accroché quelque chose! Merci.
juminet (2018-01-10 16:04:08+00:00): Oui j'espère que tu vois comment le régler. j'ai essayé de corriger à la main, mais ça me prenait trop de temps. Sinon, il y a peut-être moyen de "reverter" le chgt.
BCNorwich (2018-01-09 18:57:34+00:00): Hi, (service_times = First and Third Sunday 8:00am) this isn't recognized in OSM, I've changed it to a note= or you could place the info in description= tag.
Regards Bernard
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:33:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-09 15:47:07+00:00): Ook hier is weer sprake van plakwerk. Je tagt nu naast recreationground ook nog park. Hier is geen sprake van een park.
eggie (2018-01-09 16:02:37+00:00): park losgemaakt en omgezet naar forest
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-09 15:45:44+00:00): Ok hier hetzelfde Leisure=garden.. helaast vastgeplakt aan het gebouw. 
Wat is je motief in deze om parken en tuinen te mappen?
Graag reactie
eggie (2018-01-09 16:00:08+00:00): aangepast naar village_green. Mochten er bomen in  staan dan natural=tree op een node
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
arvdk (2018-01-11 13:29:10+00:00): Mind your description. You mainly added fences http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55295998
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Gh0stz0x (2018-01-10 15:43:42+00:00): .

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:comment

.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:56:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
PT-53 (2018-01-09 19:12:09+00:00): Hallo FHENGGE,
das Gebäude war anhand einer amtlichen Karte korrekt eingezeichnet gewesen. Deine Ändcerungen am Gebäudeumriß stellen somit eine Verschlimmbesserung dar. Auch sind Deine Namenseingaben sicher auch nicht "offiziell". Ich habe deshalb Deine Änderungen zurückgesetzt.
R0bst3r (2018-01-10 18:34:00+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55296200
chnav (2018-01-20 11:33:09+00:00): Дайыр севернее, а это жамбыл. Пожалуйста проверяйте информацию.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:03:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
SafwatHalaby (2018-01-10 08:51:31+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
.
Please note the name tag should only include proper names. "Shufersal" is a good name tag. "House" is not a good name tag. If you don't know the name of a feature, or if it doesn't have a name, it is best to keep it empty.
SafwatHalaby (2018-01-10 08:51:51+00:00): Also, you've named a forest "mogly and bar's forest". That doesn't sound like a public name.
itineris (2018-01-09 15:47:51+00:00): Légy szíves, figyelj oda a begépelt szövegekre! Javítottam őket.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:21:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
kucai (2018-01-10 03:26:07+00:00): Not an import. Nothing in Malaysia can be imported, everything the government owns is copyrighted. Old school governing style.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
L'imaginaire (2018-01-09 19:31:17+00:00): Hi MrWebber,

I can see you have lots of OSM experience, but nevertheless it would be nice if you added a changeset comment to your edits to explain what you did and what source you used.

Best regards,

Seppe
MrWebber (2018-01-09 20:23:44+00:00): Hi,
Sorry. Source is bingmaps and related items. 

BR 
MrWebber
mavl (2018-12-25 00:05:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
trigpoint (2019-10-10 11:59:17+00:00): Hi
I have changed these to public footpaths as they have been dedicated as footpaths on the basis it is  a simpler process. 

It is likely that the bridleway people will now apply for them to be upgraded as bridleways, so will monitor events.

Cheers Phil
Sheeplieder (2018-01-17 15:13:32+00:00): Hello, la route est-elle praticable ? Si oui, possible de retirer le tag construction ? sinon il faudrait commenter afin de faire correspondre avec l'année courante. Merci
chnav (2018-01-20 08:23:26+00:00): Вандализм откачен. Изменение корректного названия на устаревшее.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].