piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rarad74 (2016-10-16 20:22:56+00:00): Please do not modify correct info again to some POIs which already has correct info. Do not add redundant words to market names like minimarket , where already exist a name like La Coltu Vesel for example.
Please respond to messages!
mths (2016-10-17 20:19:09+00:00): Vil prøve at holde bedre øje næste gang, tak for rettelsen :)
Hjart (2016-10-17 20:43:28+00:00): Der er en del ting, som kræver noget erfaring for at kunne vide, så alt forladt :-)
BeKri (2016-10-17 09:56:14+00:00): Bist Du jetzt unter die Barbetreiber gegangen ;-))
Geeignet für OSM Stammtisch ???
ToniE (2016-10-17 10:05:44+00:00): Nee, eigentlich nicht - meine Oma hat mich immer davor gewarnt. Hier ist's sogar im wahrsten Sinne eine Eck-Kneipe

Inklusive Tippfehler "Toni's" mit kleinen s sollte es heißen.

Gruß,
Toni
freebeer (2019-12-21 09:35:29+00:00): just wondering why you removed the building=yes tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323906654/history so that this library outline no longer renders, only as an icon.  thanks
carciofo (2019-12-21 12:04:13+00:00): Because the area it covers is not a building. Making the perimeter of the plot as a building so that it renders would be mapping for the renderer. An icon is fine in this case afaic: the underlying data is correct.
carciofo (2019-12-21 12:04:40+00:00): *marking
redrace (2017-01-18 07:46:52+00:00): Hallo
Der Radweg hat keinen Namen! Der Namen-Tagg wir nur für wirkliche namen vergeben und nicht für Möchtegernnaman!
Schöne Grüße
maxerickson (2017-01-18 00:53:52+00:00): Re the stretch along http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233849121 , trunk vs primary is more sensibly a network distinction. A few miles of trunk doesn't make any sense.

The road is overbuilt, but it should be the same class as the adjoining sections.
parukhin (2016-10-19 15:33:47+00:00): Коллега, здравствуйте.
Здорово что добавляете POI, но добавляйте их, пожалуйста, точками в месте расположения, а не отношениями, организации ведь не занимают всё здание.
И посмотрите синтаксис часов работы, английский универсальнее и  программы смогут показывать, например, работает в данный момент организация или нет.
aleksiy68 (2016-10-21 09:54:22+00:00): Что именно в правках смущает?
parukhin (2016-10-23 10:16:41+00:00): Рисование POI отношениями, и building=yes в каждом отношении на здании у которого уже есть тег building.
+ посмотрите https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:opening_hours
aleksiy68 (2016-10-23 16:51:46+00:00): Большое спасибо, постараюсь принять к сведению.
mueschel (2016-10-17 15:06:41+00:00): http://osm.org/way/448038556

Hi, i just corrected the spelling of 'tracktype' on 4 ways - but the tagging is grade5 with surface gravel, this doesn't fit. Gravel is usually not worse than grade3. Could you check?
Carlos Brys (2020-02-22 14:51:01+00:00): La calle 100 de Garupá se llamaba originalmente Ecuador.
¿Cuál es la fuente de referencia para denominarla "Los Pereyra"?
s3b4s5 (2020-02-24 09:09:18+00:00): Buenas, la fuente que utilicé en aquel momento (2016) eran los datos de la Municipalidad de Garupá. Más precisamente los mismos que se ven en la web del Plan Estratégico Garupá 2025, en donde se indica que la calle 100 se llama "Los Pereyra" y la calle 102 "Ecuador":

http://proyectogarupa.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Sección-5-Villalonga-Unido-Santa-barbara-Gotschalk.jpg
eggie (2017-07-24 08:27:08+00:00): 'k Zie dat nooit een welkomstbericht is verstuurd... bij deze per PB
Orofarne (2017-01-01 13:59:01+00:00): Что за "Тюрьмэ"? =)
mueschel (2016-10-18 10:00:32+00:00): Moin, das Tag 'maxwide' am Weg osm.org/way/448038487 - soll das maxwidth oder maxweight sein?
DHuthmann (2016-10-18 20:27:56+00:00): Entschuldigung! Ich habe schon auf maxwidth korrigiert.
bgirardot (2016-10-17 15:10:21+00:00): Hi leslymc4 - this changeset upload seems to be a mistake adding amenity=drinking_water to all these ways and nodes.

No problem at all,  mistakes like that happen. 

I am going to ask the OSM data working group to revert (undo) this changeset so if you were adding individual water points if you could please re-add them after the changeset is undone that would be really great.

Cheers,
Blake
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-17 16:02:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42962368 where the changeset comment is: revert the accidental addition of amenity=drinking_water to 2.2k objects in Haiti
os-emmer (2024-03-15 17:07:44+00:00): Hello mor,
I found some objects you edited a long time ago. They currently use emergency=ses_station. This Tag got deprecated recently. One possible replacement is emergency=disaster_response. Can you maybe have a look and tell me if this tag would fit?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132720769
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170477632
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226665426
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440607491
mor (2024-03-15 18:04:11+00:00): Hello emmer,
I see that the tag disater_response is used for places like the Spanish Protección Civil, so yes, it fits in the objects you mention
os-emmer (2024-03-15 18:42:46+00:00): Thanks for the quick feedback. I updated 3 of the meantined objects. I still have a question about the fourth:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440607491
Is amenity=police fitting here? I do not think that amenity=police and emergency=disaster_response should be applied to one object.
mor (2024-03-20 13:18:30+00:00): According to the name (Protección Civil), police doesn't fits here
os-emmer (2024-03-20 14:53:50+00:00): I don't think we should map it this way just because of the name. I opened a node to get more feedback from others:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4160733
But thank you anyways for your help.
naoliv (2018-03-13 13:28:11+00:00): Linhares, parece que houve uma duplicação do rio aqui.
Você e o patodiez praticamente traçaram o rio no mesmo instante:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448040677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448064718

Precisaria verificar os trechos e remover algum dos caminhos duplicados.
É bom coordenar com o patodiez, se possível https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42949781
mweper (2016-10-17 00:20:12+00:00): Hola Gonzanahu.
Por favor, no uses el mapa para mapear cosas personales o ediciones "de prueba". Ten muy en cuenta que este es un mapa público y todo lo que edites en él, lo verá todo el mundo.
--
Por favor, no hagas vandalismo. Dibuja las cosas como están en la realidad, no introduzcas datos incorrectos simplemente porque ayudará al render, navegación, algún otro consumidor de datos que tenga un problema con los datos correctos o simplemente porque se ve bonito.
--
Cualquier duda que tengas, puedes ponerte en contacto conmigo o la comunidad Argentina de OSM.
GinaroZ (2016-10-16 23:36:24+00:00): thanks - has construction finished in this area?
Hobgoblin (2016-10-20 15:23:38+00:00): No, there is still a lot of building still going on.  Needs a revisit next year.
Commodoortje (2017-03-03 04:20:54+00:00): Inmiddels uw node samengevoegd op bestaande amenity=school.
.
Eén object, één OSM-element
Plaats geen nodes in identiek getagde gebieden om een pictogram op de kaart te verkrijgen. 
De renderer zal pictogrammen tonen op die gebieden, dus is er geen noodzaak om elk deeltje van het gebied dubbel in de database te zetten.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice#E.C3.A9n_object.2C_.C3.A9.C3.A9n_OSM-element
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Commodoortje (2016-10-17 10:08:11+00:00): Dutch Mapper,

Mag ik vragen waarom je deze residentials hebt weggehaald?
Aggregaat02 (2016-10-17 10:24:17+00:00): Beste Commodoortje,
Op deze forum-pagina is Eggie begonnen over het verwijderen van de residential: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56078
Constable (2016-10-17 09:55:21+00:00): hey Tatiana, if you want to add the Russian name of an object you have to use the "name:ru=*" name instead of putting the russian name into the "name:en=" tag.
Please remove "Тайная вечерь" from the name:en tag and put it into the name:ru tag.
Feel free to ask here if you need help.
Thanks
Alecs01 (2016-10-22 13:21:30+00:00): Reverted
muralito (2016-10-17 02:14:32+00:00): Ya estaba mapeado.
letihu (2016-10-30 18:19:54+00:00): Was soll
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448060573/history
denn darstellen?
JochenB (2016-10-30 19:37:46+00:00): oh, da hatte ich die tags vergessen. Laut Bing ein Bahngleis. Habs korrigiert
PlaneMad (2016-11-19 18:09:39+00:00): H, you have added over 100 villages with name=村庄 http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kbp

Is this correct?
Bonix-Mapper (2017-10-01 00:33:30+00:00): AjBelnuovo,

O que acontece?

Eu edito com os dados oficiais da PMSP, coloco isso na descrição.... mesmo assim você vem e alterado igual está no Google e nem pergunta.

Como é possível você fazer isso repetidas vezes?

Vou ter que arrumar isso novamente para depois você vir e desfazer?

Não consigo entender porque você mapeia solitariamente.

Porque não pergunta para o mapeador que veio antes se é isso mesmo?
Bonix-Mapper (2017-10-01 00:37:38+00:00): O nome oficial é: Avenida Miguel Estefno.
santamariense (2017-10-01 00:55:34+00:00): E não há como dar desculpas que usou a camada IBGE Urbana, pois na camada IBGE Urbana também consta como Estefno.
santamariense (2017-10-01 00:58:57+00:00): Haveria, por acaso, placas com o nome errado na rua? Qual a fonte verdadeira dos dados?
O Fim (2017-10-01 01:59:41+00:00): Não mesmo eu corrigi o nome dessa via a mais de 2 anos, o nome nas placas e av Miguel Estefno , com certeza desconhecimento total da região e copia de algum outro lugar
AjBelnuovo (2017-10-05 12:24:36+00:00): Me desculpem por demorar em responder , mas as mensagens foram param spam . A minha fonte foi a EMTU .Por exemplo Linha 050 ( http://www.emtu.sp.gov.br/emtu/itinerarios-e-tarifas/encontre-uma-linha/pelo-numero-da-linha.fss?numlinha=050&pag=buscanumero.htm)
AjBelnuovo (2017-10-05 12:28:36+00:00): Eu não uso o Google Maps como referência . E se o nome correto é o que o Bonix-Mapper diz , eu volto lá e refaço . Porque não pergunto ? Porque as vezes que perguntei ( não a vocês ) não obtive nenhuma resposta .
santamariense (2017-10-05 15:56:33+00:00): A melhor coisa seria participar de grupos. Telegram é o grupo mais dinâmico, onde é possível trocar ideias enquanto se está mapeando. Inclusive, existe um grupo do estado de SP. Uma vez instalado no smartphone, você pode usar ele sempre que quiser pelo navegador web do computador. https://web.telegram.org/#/im?p=@osmsp
AjBelnuovo (2017-10-05 16:01:17+00:00): Eu tenho o Telegram instalado . Qual é o nome do grupo ou você pode me incluir ?
AjBelnuovo (2017-10-05 16:02:25+00:00): Ah , vou mandar mensagem para a EMTU pedindo para que eles corrijam o nome da via nos trajetos das linhas que passam por lá .
Bonix-Mapper (2017-10-05 20:08:38+00:00):  AjBelnuovo,

Antes de clicar no link no seu celular inclua um nome de usuário no telegram:
Em configuração do telegram -> Username (Nome de usuário).

Tente entrar neste grupo: https://t.me/osmsp

https://t.me/osmsp
Carnildo (2016-10-17 06:48:44+00:00): "boundary=national_park" is a general-purpose "large protected area" tag.  The "protected_area" tagging system gives more precision, but until more map renderers understand it, double-tagging national forests as national parks is fairly standard practice.

"boundary=forest" is rarely used, and does not appear to be understood by any map renderer.
naoliv (2018-03-13 13:28:10+00:00): patodiez, parece que hubo una duplicación del río aquí.
Usted y el Linhares prácticamente trazaron el río en el mismo instante:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448040677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448064718

Es necesario comprobar y quitar algunos de los caminos duplicados.
Es bueno coordinar con Linhares, si es posible https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42944978
Linhares (2018-03-13 15:07:44+00:00): Quite a lo mio (448040677)
Gracias, Nelson!
HubMiner (2017-10-12 01:10:30+00:00): Hi, per this note discussion (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1151971), I removed name "Cave with Birdman Petroglyphs".  Do you know the correct location for that?
cleary (2016-10-17 08:47:35+00:00): I agree that neighbourhood is not appropriate in non-urban settings. In regard to Tucklan, I surveyed there one to two years ago and I think I was able to record only two addresses in the very small Tucklan area and satellite imagery shows only two dwellings with adjacent sheds. So perhaps "isolated_dwelling" is more appropriate for Tucklan. I am uncomfortable with using village or hamlet where it is not the formal address of residents. I would support a new category for small settlements but significantly smaller than the 100-200 residents identified for hamlets. There is scope for user-defined tags under place and maybe we should look for one such as "rural place".  Whatever tag you prefer for Tucklan, I'd like also to see "is_in:town=Dunedoo" since Dunedoo is the formal address location for Tucklan. Also I think we should delete the GNB references since it appears OSM was never given permission to use that data.
Warin61 (2016-10-17 21:13:02+00:00): GNB has some statement of open source? Not fussed. 
However the GNB 'rural place' is used for both inhabitabited places and uninhabited places! It is not a 'good' description. What attracted my attention to this was the use of neighborhood for places inside the Blue Mountains NP that have never been inhabited.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:51:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
surveyor54 (2016-10-29 17:13:16+00:00): Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass in einem Wohnhaus ein Reisemobilstellplatz ist.
Bitte äußere dich hierzu.
Gruß
surveyor54
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
gpstracks (2016-10-19 16:12:45+00:00): Buongiorno.

Il tag place=locality va usato per luoghi non popolati.
In questo caso, penso che sia più appropriato place=neighbourhood

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood

oppure place=hamlet per i borghi più isolati

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dhamlet

Ciao
dgitto (2016-10-19 15:54:06+00:00): ma le cascate di solito non stanno lungo i fiumi? da dove viene l'acqua, e dove va? :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-23 17:24:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:56:01+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
Hjart (2016-10-17 14:17:44+00:00): Jeg har tilføjet en kategori og hjemmesiden
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
Howpper (2016-10-17 13:00:52+00:00): Sorry, I thought it would be rendered as a forest. As soon as I saw what happened, I went to go fix it, but you already did.
tauba (2016-11-15 16:31:56+00:00): Hi,
could you please name the source of your changes? I live in the area and the rails you added do not exist anymore. They were removed in spring this year (also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38815948).
So therefore I will correct this probably today to represent the proper ways again. If you have doubts concerning my knowledge of the area, please contact me directly.
Osm1980 (2018-06-06 19:44:41+00:00): salam inja jaye zendegieh zaheran koohe fahat baad roostaee be hamin nam dar  shomal in mahdoodeh ast!!!
j-wills (2016-11-04 19:56:27+00:00): можно на русском ;)
robbieonsea (2016-12-18 09:28:54+00:00): I'm not sure where you get your information from as: 1) The Trafalgar has been closed since the end of summer 2016 and 2) The location is a bit inaccurate as it is nearer Edinburgh Road.
tibzon_R4U (2016-12-19 11:16:19+00:00): Thank you Robbie!

This must have been a mistake from my part, I remember the entrance being behind the Edinburg Road bus stop. Sorry and thanks again!
Andrea Musuruane (2017-11-01 18:29:56+00:00): Ciao, Sei sicuro del numero di telefono? Inizia per 02.... Inoltre, il formato del numero deve essere "+39 prefisso numero" (notare gli spazi). Infine, manca il numero civico. Ciao, Andrea
gsa (2016-12-26 10:11:13+00:00): Do you mean "maxspeed=20" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448099277 ?
user_5359 (2016-10-23 17:34:41+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:55:53+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-23 17:37:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I habve delete your modification because it is a duplicate entry. Did you see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227238756 ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-23 17:38:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:55:41+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
user_5359 (2016-10-23 17:41:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the consistency of your operation and changeset comments!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-23 17:44:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:55:33+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
nyuriks (2017-09-27 03:01:11+00:00): Hi, i'm moving dup wikipedia/wikidata info to parent relation, as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Improvement_Tasks#Duplicate_tags_on_a_relation_and_its_members thx!
GerdP (2020-11-14 14:47:57+00:00): Moin,
habe gerade zwei der superkurzen tunnel=culvert auf etwa Wegbreite verlängert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94108114
Es gibt aber noch viel mehr davon. Normalerweise ist doch so ein Ding ein Rohr unter dem Weg, typischerweise eher länger als der Weg breit ist. Warum hast Du die so kurz gezeichnet?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
martiensch (2016-10-20 18:01:07+00:00): Hallo Wetitpig0,

Willkommen bei OSM. Ich möchte mich mal erkundigen, wie das Mappen auf der Karte gefällt und ob du schon bekannt bist mit unseren Edit-Tipps und Hausregeln.

Um gleich mal los zu legen. Ich vermute, dass das Kreieren einer Relation für die Berliner Mauer nicht zu 100% gelungen ist, würde aber dazu gerne wissen, was du gemacht hast.

Gruß,

Martien
EneaSuper (2016-10-18 11:42:05+00:00): Non è taggata come scalinata, ma come strada pedonale :o
nickrulezz (2016-10-18 11:51:34+00:00): grazie, ho modificato
EneaSuper (2016-10-18 11:54:12+00:00): Bene, ottimo lavoro! :)
mavl (2016-10-17 18:00:39+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Вы использовали тег surface=dirt для дороги http:/www.openstreetmap.org/way/448120370/history  
Этот тег используется только тогда, когда грязь постоянная [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:surface]. А так в этом месте растёт трава и в сухую погоду грязи там нет, что и обозначено на дороге http:/www.openstreetmap.org/way/233402155 Обозначать одну и ту же дорогу дважды не нужно (вы провели новую дорогу в трёх метрах от существующей). И это не переулок Машиностроителей, а дорога в лес. Тег "addr:city" не нужно указывать на дорогах. На дорогах используется тег "name".  
  
http:/www.openstreetmap.org/way/448120368 Эта дорога не является Рабочей улицей. Лучше было бы обозначить её как проезд. Когда я видел его в последний раз, то это была укатанная земля (surface=ground).  
  
http:/www.openstreetmap.org/way/448120363 Этот дом вы добавили из 2ГИС'а? Я не помню есть ли там сейчас дом, но адресной таблички на нём точно не было (иначе он был бы уже обозначен и подписан). Этот дом вы добавили неаккуратно. Если посмотреть на спутниковый снимок, то видно, что дом в действительности меньше, чем вы его обозначили. Кроме того, этот дом (и другие дома, которые вы добавили) непрямоугольный. В редакторе iD для этого есть специальная команда "Сделать углы прямыми".  
  
http:/www.openstreetmap.org/way/448120365 Какой источник вы использовали для добавления этого дома и адреса?  
  
http:/www.openstreetmap.org/way/448120374 Эта дорога обозначена как проезд или сервисная дорога (highway=service). На самом деле это полевая дорога и обозначать её нужно как highway=track.  
  
Не нужно на каждый дом добавлять "addr:city=Мичуринский" или "addr:city=Заводоуковск". Принадлежность дома к населённому пункту определяется по нахождению этого дома в пределах границ населённого пункта.
user_5359 (2016-10-23 17:48:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:55:23+00:00): I have deleted your entry!