piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2020-02-21 16:40:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
hackthemap (2019-12-20 07:11:03+00:00): Hi user_5359 :)

The website field should have the protocol, e.g. https:// in it, else, it is not a valid url: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website?uselang=en-US
Specifying the https in it, if it is available, also helps security in comparison to just specifying http or nothing!
https://mathcitymap.eu
would be the url to put in in this case.

hackthemap :)
mavl (2020-02-21 16:40:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
boda boda (2020-10-23 01:40:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32334812 is a duplicate
mavl (2020-02-21 16:40:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
gendy54 (2019-12-07 20:42:47+00:00): Ca a l'air correct. merci
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78012148
eggie (2019-12-05 19:44:24+00:00): Hi Ursus... two times the same name?  Perhaps removing the name on the building.
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-05 20:02:17+00:00): on the building?.. from the left building :)
ursus kirk (2019-12-05 20:14:50+00:00): There is the old church part and an old appendix. Both have been sold. Thus one has become the church building of the Motion Church (One could call it the 'Motion Church Church') And the appendix has been bought by the foundation called 'Motion Church'. This part is rented out and used for groups and is NOT a church. So technically yes two times the same name. Although I can see how strange it can seem.
eggie (2019-12-05 20:42:54+00:00): Oke... enjoy your identical names :)
Thanks for response. 
Greetz,
Eggie
mavl (2020-02-21 16:40:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:40:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:44:49+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-60.28148&lat=-3.20906&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:46:58+00:00): Sorry uncomplete copy:

    Hi greenmapper,
    your recent changesets have left behind several errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

    http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-60.28148&lat=-3.20906&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

    Can you please fix this?

    Guido
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
gendy54 (2019-12-07 20:39:45+00:00): Si le data center prend tout le bâtiment, c'est correct, sinon il faudra modifier en supprimant les tags sur le batiment et ajouter un noeud là où il est réellement.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78012652
GinaroZ (2019-12-05 22:20:41+00:00): Hi, what was the problem that you were trying to fix?
CFairbairn (2019-12-08 13:51:36+00:00): For whatever reason when using the ORSM route finder for bike and car it refuses to go down Drysdale Avenue.

Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=56.0389%2C-3.8170%3B56.0411%2C-3.8124

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=56.03937%2C-3.81591%3B56.04225%2C-3.81460#map=17/56.03978/-3.81718
CFairbairn (2019-12-08 13:52:41+00:00): *OSRM
GinaroZ (2019-12-08 14:19:16+00:00): I think it might be the construction=residential tag which is causing that, so I've removed it - might take a day or so before it updates the routing.

Also, if you are local then perhaps you could help with this note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1844786 ? Speed limits are also missing from these roads, if you know them.
GinaroZ (2019-12-09 21:17:34+00:00): Seems to be fixed now. Think I'll need to go and remove other unneeded construction tags from the map...
Stalker61 (2019-12-06 11:33:29+00:00): В связи с вашим упорным игнорированием 
пользовательского соглашения правил написания адреса https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
Я вынужден отметить ваши изменения.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-12 11:27:17+00:00): Hello!

You used
seamark:beacon_lateral:colour=green;
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2300566678/history

Have you maybe meant
seamark:beacon_lateral:colour=green
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Jordi MF (2019-12-05 23:51:48+00:00): Hola,

Gracias por mejorar OpenStreetMap. Sin embargo, ten en cuenta que la etiqueta leisure=park se utiliza para parques grandes, en estado semisilvestre y donde se pueden realizar múultiples actividades de ocio. Por tanto, no es adecuado cómo los estás añadiendo. Puedes consultar la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
Si tienes cualquier duda, también puedes ponerte en contacto con la comunidad española de OSM en Telegram.
Gracias y te animamos a seguir mejorando la base de datos. Un saludo,

Jordi
Covid-LockDown (2020-12-18 16:41:28+00:00): Pointless in creating this way way 753084992 and coming back and adding the road name. Do you really think is there any connectivity here from node 7036703987 to node 7036697991.
rallynukab (2020-12-18 18:13:44+00:00): Hello Covid-LockDown,
As you can see from the history of this object, I made this edit a year ago. That was based on the available imagery at the time. You can look at the current version of Bing imagery available and see that there was a road there in the older imagery. Maxar has updated this year, showing that now there is no longer a road there. I have corrected the edit based on the new available imagery.

Hola Covid-LockDown,
Como puede ver en el historial de este objeto, hice esta edición hace un año. Eso se basó en las imágenes disponibles en ese momento. Puede ver la versión actual de las imágenes de Bing disponible y ver que había un camino allí en las imágenes más antiguas. Maxar ha actualizado este año, mostrando que ahora ya no hay camino allí. He corregido la edición en función de las nuevas imágenes disponibles.
Carlos Brys (2019-12-05 20:12:44+00:00): Desde la calle 127, el Arroyo La Chancha se ve a cielo abierto y no entubado.
Al parecer la etiqueta tunnel=yes no va desde ese punto
Carlos2170 (2019-12-05 20:23:29+00:00): Ahora, Desde Av. Areco, pasando por ch. 239, por ch 244, hasta desembocar a cielo abierto en la av. Jauretche, se ha entubado completamente (este año fue).
PT-53 (2019-12-05 18:59:55+00:00): Hallo will-i-trotzdem,
so ist das jetzt in.O. mit Ausnahme der Öffnungszeiten. In OSm werden englische Schlüsselwerte verwendet. Schau Dir dazu das Wiki an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
Grüße
aceman444 (2019-12-07 13:29:28+00:00): Hi, danke fuer die Tagfixes in Petrzalka, sie sehen sehr gut aus. Ausser vielleicht die waterway=riverbank -> natural=water auf dem Chorvatsky kanal. Die 'water' tags are schon an dem Multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3417898 . Wenn dir der iD editor die korrekturen vorschlagt, bitte inspiziere wie genau es die Tags aendern wird. Der iD editor is beruehmt fuer erfinden von eigenen Tags die die OSM daten beschaedigen. Vorallem bitte benutze den crossing=marked Tag in der Slowakei nicht.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:56:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:55:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Carlos Brys (2019-12-05 20:17:50+00:00): Confirmado el asfalto en la Av. Bustamante hasta Luis Pérez, según Mapillary
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/1VO83LJDB2lla2onXqMZZQ
viloan (2019-12-05 19:33:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:47:37+00:00): Hi greenmapper,
your recent changesets have left behind several errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

    http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-60.28148&lat=-3.20906&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

Guido
Carlos Brys (2019-12-05 19:36:44+00:00): Ver si no se afectó a la relación del Rio Paraná
mapman44 (2019-12-18 03:23:29+00:00): There is an untagged line along Westside Road in this changeset that you worked on. Can you please take a look and apply the correct tag? Thanks.
IIVQ (2020-01-01 15:19:45+00:00): Ha, ik wou net de junction=roundabout toevoegen, blijk jij het al gedaan te hebben. Bedankt!
Carto'Cité (2019-12-18 14:47:36+00:00): Bonjour Vincent,
Tu as déjà décrit la piste cyclable de cette portion de rue https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26364157, le tag cycleway=track est donc en doublon avec la piste existante (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753509915). Je corrige en ajoutant cyclway=separate qui permet aux contributeur de StreetComplete d'éviter de remettre le doublon.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
vincentxavier (2019-12-18 15:03:59+00:00): Ah oui, bien vu. Je l'ai fait une fois en rapide, puis je l'ai refait avec une voie séparée et j'ai peut-être oublié de faire une partie des modifs.

Merci en tout cas et s'il y a des améliorations à faire n'hésite pas.

Il faut que je tagge les «bollards» qui empêchent les voitures de s'engager dessus.
Carto'Cité (2019-12-18 15:52:12+00:00): Merci pour ton retour :)
Charles
mueschel (2019-12-08 11:54:35+00:00): Hi,
could you check the two nodes of the railway station? Something went wrong with the name tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7036935130
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7036935131
clay_c (2019-12-08 18:22:32+00:00): Thanks for catching that! Fixed in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78115624
woodpeck (2019-12-08 21:50:51+00:00): Can you explain why you have changed a few objects that are clearly schools to universities in this an neighbouring changesets?
AshlyAsh (2019-12-09 00:47:22+00:00): Yes I can
They are in fact colleges, but I could not find the option for that, so I changed them into universities because that's more describing of that kind of education that gets educated at there
osmviborg (2019-12-09 07:56:03+00:00): Draw a area around the buildings and tag it amenity=college (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Map_Features#Uddannelse_.28Education.29)
AshlyAsh (2019-12-09 12:34:15+00:00): Thanks
osmviborg (2019-12-09 13:16:21+00:00): @AshlyAsh the buildings must still be tagged 'school' - it's the surrounding area you tag 'college'. See changeset 78151660
osmviborg (2019-12-09 13:39:43+00:00): Actually there is a tag for buildings as well 'building=college' https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abuilding%3Dcollege
AshlyAsh (2019-12-09 16:49:15+00:00): Thanks
mueschel (2020-01-04 11:13:39+00:00): When adding street names, please make sure you actually add a 'name' tag. I just fixed several ways that got tags like
Calle = Amapola.
user_5359 (2019-12-06 07:18:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the booth buidings. I hope I solve the fixme.
aachso (2019-12-05 22:29:00+00:00): Hallo wilsberg,

die URL für die website ist etwas fehlerhaft, besser wäre hier aber auch ein Link der direkt zu dieser spezifischen Filiale führt: https://www.getraenke-hoffmann.de/node/5252

Hast du building=commercial bewusst auf building=yes geändert? Zumindest auf Luftbildern sieht das doch sehr nach einem rein kommerziell genutzten Gebäude aus.
wilsberg (2019-12-06 08:51:49+00:00): Hallo aachso,
den Direktlink hatte ich nicht gefunden, nur den Filialfinder. Deiner ist also besser.
Das mit dem "building=commercial" habe ich in Unwissenheit geändert, weil ich es von dem etwas nördlicher gelegenen Toom-Getränkemarkt kopiert hatte (der sah für mich richtig aus).
Also kannst DU es dann bitte korrigieren?

Danke für's Drübergucken.
aachso (2019-12-06 12:48:16+00:00): Ich könnte das nötigenfalls selber machen, aber eigentlich würde ich dich gerne bitten, deine Fehler selbst zu korrigieren. Merci
wilsberg (2019-12-06 14:13:21+00:00): Hab's erledigt.
aachso (2019-12-06 15:09:54+00:00): Super, vielen Dank!
DressyPear4 (2019-12-05 21:51:56+00:00): Olá, a ferramenta MapWithAI é muito útil para agilizar as edições, mas você percebeu que muitas vias ficam desconectadas?
Desse modo são inúteis para roteamento de veículos.
Carlos Brys (2019-12-06 10:19:05+00:00): Eliminé un nodo inconsistente de mirador turístico y cambie el nombre al núcleo 490
mariotomo (2019-12-06 00:58:55+00:00): hola.  esta acción (útil) parece algo coordinado y organizado.  donde está la página wiki que la describe?
VigotheCarpathian (2019-12-06 17:52:21+00:00): Hello Mario the removal of the ref tag is in accordance to the osm guidelines on the osm wiki page below.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref
VigotheCarpathian (2019-12-09 17:09:54+00:00): Hello Mario, here is the wiki page of projects and places that Kaart are working in. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kaart
mariotomo (2019-12-09 20:47:52+00:00): interesting list, it does not mention Panama though.  so you're not working on Panamá?  or are you?  or not currently?  where's the historic activities?  may I suggest you merge your page with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities, mentioned at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing.
VigotheCarpathian (2019-12-09 22:08:51+00:00): Hello Mario, Kaart works on countries throughout the world improving road networks and more. We have ongoing projects in many countries including Panama. We do not take ownership of anyone country. Our wiki page does highlight that we have made contributions to Panama and other countries.
mariotomo (2019-12-10 14:27:34+00:00): I'm afraid I did not bring the point through to you: I do not see any mention of ongoing Kaart activity on your pages, nor did you reach out to the community, nor did you follow the Organized Editing protocol.
VigotheCarpathian (2019-12-10 17:00:50+00:00): We initially visited Panama in 2015 and did some ground surveying across the entire country.  Since that time we occasionally review the data in Panama and make some one off fixes or additions to continue to improve the map.  Our efforts are documented on our wiki and GitHub pages and we are listed on the organized editing activities.
mariotomo (2019-12-10 17:12:42+00:00): it's very generic, your 'Road Network Improvement' projects.  it's more than one project, isn't it?  I don't see where you mention Panama.  would you agree with me that your Panamanian efforts are undocumented?
VigotheCarpathian (2019-12-10 18:51:21+00:00): No, on our wiki page it lists Panama under ‘Contributions’ detailing where we have driven and provided data improvements.    The imagery is available in Mapillary.  There is not an organized editing project currently in Panama from our team.  We occasionally review the data and do one off fixes and additions for continued improvement.
mariotomo (2019-12-10 20:59:08+00:00): it would be nice if you had a page, describing your activity for Panama specifically. if you did that, local people could detail the problems encountered with your contributions. it would also be nice if more of your editors reacted to comments on their changesets, as you do, and took action accordingly, as you also do.
SuperFlomm (2019-12-07 10:38:52+00:00): Hallo,
von welchem Schild ist hier die Rede? Alle Schilder, die ich gesehen habe, nennen die Ausfahrt nur Oberzell, ohne Ravensburg.

Foto:
https://i.imgur.com/YlAlZs5.png
DressyPear4 (2019-12-05 21:52:48+00:00): Olá, a ferramenta MapWithAI é muito útil para agilizar as edições, mas você percebeu que muitas vias ficam desconectadas?
Desse modo são inúteis para roteamento de veículos.
Covid-LockDown (2020-12-18 16:38:26+00:00): Do you think is there any connectivity from node 6592315075 to node 6592315074. As already said you and your team members are creating unnecessary ways and causing routing impact.
rallynukab (2020-12-18 18:11:44+00:00): Hello Covid-LockDown,
As you can see from the history of this object, I made this edit a year ago. That was based on the available imagery at the time. You can look at the current version of Bing imagery available and see that there were not buildings there in the older imagery. Maxar has updated this year, showing that now there are buildings built there. I have corrected the edit based on the new available imagery. 

Hola Covid-LockDown,
Como puede ver en el historial de este objeto, hice esta edición hace un año. Eso se basó en las imágenes disponibles en ese momento. Puede ver la versión actual de las imágenes de Bing disponible y ver que no había edificios en las imágenes más antiguas. Maxar ha actualizado este año, mostrando que ahora hay edificios construidos allí. He corregido la edición en función de las nuevas imágenes disponibles.
Константин Гам (2019-12-11 14:02:12+00:00): Вы зачем-то нанесли :
1) несуществующий физически проезд для автомобилей перед театром Буфф
2) парковку вокруг театра, которая уже была обозначена расширили по каким-то несуществующим границам (можно увидеть по яндекс панорамам легко), я тут работаю, могу выслать фото


Пожалуйста, внимательней, в правках!
DemoLogin (2019-12-11 19:33:27+00:00): Панорамы действительно удобный инструмент. С паркингом согласен.
Проезда от входа к пр. Шаумаяна действительно нет.. хотя я уверен, что видел его перегороженным блоками.
Спасибо за замечания.
NicolasGrosjean (2021-07-31 07:19:39+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis tombé sur votre changeset via un challenge Maproulette (https://maproulette.org/challenge/18086) car les stop et Césez le passage ont la direcction inverse (voir le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dstop#Directions).
Je ne sais pas si vous avez fait une erreur ou si les sens des rues ont changé en tout cas j'ai fait la correction sur Montbartier mais je vous laisse corriger ailleurs.
Ninjoh (2019-12-06 17:24:36+00:00): Ik weet dat het overal zo gebeurd, maar is het niet een beter idee om deze gebieden niet over te trekken maar om de originele vectordata te gebruiken? Het verlies aan nauwkeurigheid is zo zonde en verwarrend.
AdVerburg (2019-12-06 19:25:25+00:00): Waar zijn "originele vectordata" te bekomen? En mogen die dan gebruikt worden in OSM?
Overigens denk ik dat de nauwkeurigheid best redelijk is, maar inderdaad een vergissing is snel gemaakt.
Ninjoh (2019-12-06 21:55:31+00:00): Naar mijn mening is de vector data gebruiken weinig anders dan overtrekken, maar dan van hogere kwaliteit. 
Natura2000 wordt ook beschikbaar gesteld als WFS (Web Feature Service, vector data protocol uit de familie WMTS, WMS, WCS enz). 
https://www.pdok.nl/geo-services/-/article/beschermde-gebieden-natura2000-inspire-geharmoniseerd-
Eigenlijk moet ik (we?) dit eens aankaarten op de forums. Een van de belangrijke dingen is dat je wel dezelfde transformatie van RD naar WGS84 gebruikt als de BAG-import plugin om inconsistenties in onze dataset te voorkomen.

Alle bestuurlijke grenzen in Nederland in OSM lijden van het hetzelfde probleem, ze zijn handmatig overtrokken. In de geo-informatie is dat eigenlijk een doodzonde.

Het zou mooi zijn als we al die officiele data die per definitie maar 1 werkelijke positie heeft vervangen met de officiele, correct getransformeerde vector data. Dat zou de reputatie van OSM ook fors verbeteren.
jaap de vries (2019-12-09 15:52:11+00:00): Zijn jullie bekend met deze informatie? 
https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/natura2000/gebiedendatabase.aspx?subj=n2k&groep=0https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/natura2000/documenten/gebieden/A0_RVO_N2000_RV_20180503.pdf
jaap de vries (2019-12-09 15:52:49+00:00): oeps spatie vergeten
https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/natura2000/gebiedendatabase.aspx?subj=n2k&groep=0 
   https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/natura2000/documenten/gebieden/A0_RVO_N2000_RV_20180503.pdf
user_5359 (2019-12-06 07:25:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
eteb3 (2021-06-30 08:32:49+00:00): Hi GreenPat

You indicated the steps running from the station plaza to the station underpass as an amphitheatre. 

Are you aware of any theatre/music/other events that take place here, or is did you mean to describe the seating only?

Thanks.
GreenPat (2021-07-02 19:49:25+00:00): Hi eteb3,

Do change the tag if you want.

I tagged it to describe the visual appearance and practical capability. 

I would expect it has been used for performances, but very infrequently, maybe once a year or less.

I do like the idea of OSM holding information sufficient for, for example, a theatre company to be able to find free stages in each city to put on performances.

The general use is certainly seating, and the 'theatre' icon on osm-carto is misleading.

Thanks.
user_5359 (2019-12-06 06:44:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2019-12-06 07:26:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:45:25+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-60.28148&lat=-3.20906&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:47:28+00:00): Hi greenmapper,
your recent changesets have left behind several errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

    http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-60.28148&lat=-3.20906&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

Guido