piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
4004 (2017-10-01 20:18:37+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
тротуары (те, что вплотную к дороге) обозначаются footway=sidewalk
malajul (2018-02-01 21:45:05+00:00): Is there really no way to enter this residential road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528186377 Thanks!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:28:12+00:00): Hello FredrikLindseth. In the relation you have tagged `no:wikipedia` instead of `wikipedia=no:...`, right? Please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
FredrikLindseth (2017-09-29 18:27:47+00:00): ah. Thanks. 
I think I recently did this somewhere else too. I was tagging from memory and not checking the wiki :-)
4004 (2017-09-28 16:05:11+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
Я правильно понимаю, что это фиксированная а не временная камера? Если так, то все отмечено верно, а ваши правки дороги и нп рядом выглядят ок
Rym Rym (2017-09-28 16:18:10+00:00): Да. Камера фиксированная уже давно висит.
4004 (2017-09-29 08:58:35+00:00): отлично, спасибо
eggie (2017-09-27 18:40:01+00:00): I'm sorry "Walkin tour Memorial Damslachtoffers 7 mei 1945" is not the right name of the memorial. I will delete your contribution
user_3022894 (2018-08-13 09:02:13+00:00): Hallo M!Cado,
dieser Way hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105842100 ist schon lange als Brücke markiert. Da braucht es kein Tunnel-Attrinut für die Straße drunter her. Habe es bereits korrigiert, wollt's nur sagen. Viele Grüße, Lukas
anieto (2017-10-04 22:20:09+00:00): Hola. Se te fue la mano en la esquina del museo no? :P
GinaroZ (2017-09-27 18:39:35+00:00): Hi, can I ask what is the reason for this change?
CycleStreets (2017-09-27 19:41:04+00:00): Hi - a user gave us details that there was a pedestrian crossing not shown, so I added that and showed the layout more accurately, based on the aerial imagery. Do feel free to adjust if anything is wrong.
ACS1986 (2017-09-28 09:45:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM Andrew,

Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528193161 really called "Hotel". We only use the name tag for the actual name of something (if indeed it has one). To show that a building is a hotel you can add the tag tourism=hotel.

One other tiny point,  it makes it difficult for other mappers to see what's going on if changesets include edits spread across very large areas (such as multiple countries). The in browser editor (iD) automatically starts a new changeset for each save, so please just try to save whenever you've finished editing in one area, before you move on to the next area. 

Thanks and do keep up the good work,

Adam
piaco_dk (2017-09-28 17:43:07+00:00): http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/651#129
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-02-06 08:18:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421567985 - czy jest ona projektowana czy w budowie?
Tomek Darda (2018-02-06 12:28:54+00:00): Fragment od Rydlówki jest gotowy, od Konopnickiej rozpoczęta budowa, dalej (koło terenów Garbarni jest droga gruntowa - jeszcze niedostępna, do przerobienia na asfalt. Nie znam terminu zakończenia, ale prawdopodobny ten rok.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-02-06 12:57:24+00:00): Zaktualizowałbyś w takim razie opis tej drogi? W opisie jest "planowana" a nie w budowie...
Tomek Darda (2018-02-06 13:04:42+00:00): Poza częścią (w zasadzie chyba tylko skrzyżowania) od Konopnickiej i do Rydlówki, która jest gotowa i jako taka zaznaczona nie trwają teraz prace (teren w sumie niedostępny, więc trudno aż tak zobaczyć), więc zostawiłbym jako planowaną, dopóki nie zobaczę łopat ;)
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:12:20+00:00): Hello Mereoni Ketewai. In this changeset you have tagged all the buildings with `hurricane: damage` (with space after colon) instead of `hurricane:damage`, right? I think you should review it. #typo
BCNorwich (2017-09-28 05:28:57+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I wish to inform you that you have placed the  POI for the supermarket in the middle of the street. It would be better to place the POI more precisely and preferably drawing in the building. If not drawing the building then adding address details is helpful for folk wanting to find the place.
If you need any help just ask.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2017-10-08 06:44:48+00:00): Hi good to see you've removed the POI and added a feature. I've made minor amendments to go along with OSM best practice, (removed retail area tag from within existing retail tagged area), then added a building tag to the featusr so folk know what it is.
Many Thanks & Regards Bernard
emvee (2017-09-30 07:02:26+00:00): Bedankt voor het toevoegen van de verkeerslichten.

Ter info:

Ik probeer de openstreetmap data geschikt te maken zodat routeplanners ook stoplichten mee kunnen nemen en zo een route kunnen plannen met minder stoplichten.

Daarvoor zijn behalve stoplichten ook de richting nodig, als de weg geen eenrichtingsverkeer is; dat kan met de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals:direction tag.

Ik heb ze voor dit kruispunt toegevoegd, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52500917
A67-A67 (2017-09-30 19:50:19+00:00): Bedankt voor de verbetering! Ik wist niet van de direction-tag.

Ik vraag me nu wel nog iets af over deze locatie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.00905/4.35512 
Ik heb hier gisteren ook stoplichten toegevoegd. Omdat ze zo goed als op de kruising staan, heb ik die aan de kruisingsnode toegevoegd. Moeten deze stoplichten ook in vier stoplichten per kruising met direction-tags worden opgesplitst of worden ze zo al herkend door routeplanners?
emvee (2017-10-01 07:23:17+00:00): Ik heb even gekeken bij de Bolkbrug maar dit zijn stoplichten die geplaatst zijn volgens de "oude stijl", dat is, op het knooppunt zelf.

De "nieuwe stijl" is om verkeerslichten te plaatsen op de stopstreep, dat is nauwkeuriger, nu komen bijv. overstekende fietsers twee stoplichten tegen en dat is eigenlijk niet op te lossen met de direction tag omdat dan geldt voor de doorgaande en de kruisende weg.

NB: Voor "problemen" kijk eens op http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=netherlands_noord_holland&item=2090 en de "Map" link, die van netherlands_zuid_holland is "schoon" ;-)
A67-A67 (2017-10-01 21:41:03+00:00): Bedankt voor de informatie. Ik heb de stoplichten bij de Bolkbrug en in de Phoenixstraat omgezet naar de nieuwe stijl.
gileri (2017-10-06 20:26:42+00:00): Bonjour,

Je ne suis pas familier avec ces tunnels, mais il y a plusieurs endroits où ils ne sont pas connectés sur OSM :

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52422928

Est-ce normal ?
superrache (2017-10-07 19:12:13+00:00): Bonjour,
Les tracés que j'ai ajouté ne sont sans doute pas précis, car il est très difficile d'avoir des informations sur ces galeries. Effectivement, les galeries ne sont pas connectées à des rues ou des batiments car elles sont à environ 30m sous terre, accessibles par des puits à l'intérieur de batis.
gileri (2017-10-08 20:43:44+00:00): En effet c'est compréhensible pour la difficulté à rattacher les tunnels avec la surface qui est sur OSM. Dans ce cas il serait interessant de mettre un tag note=* ou fixme=* pour indiquer que la géométrie est une approximation.

Ce que je voulais dire par rapport aux problèmes de connectivité c'est que des tunnels se croisent sans être connectés, et d'autres se terminent pas loin d'un autre tunnel, ce qui laisse penser qu'ils devrait être connectés entre-eux.
letihu (2017-09-30 21:27:10+00:00): Wo ist denn hier die Fehlerbehebung, wenn die nodes jetzt doppelt sind?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2482044416/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5130926452/history
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:14:18+00:00): Hello Maryellen Keegan. In this and other changesets you have tagged `Hurricane:Damage` instead of lowercase `hurricane:damage`. I think you should review your changsets ;-) #typo
kartler175 (2017-10-21 08:49:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=42.99112%2C-82.01099%3B42.98690%2C-82.00408#map=14/42.9822/-81.9561

Please reconnect highway nodes.
Zian Choy (2017-12-04 06:47:52+00:00): I don't see the swimming pool in Esri's World Imagery layer. Is there a chance you were using Digital Globe's Standard imagery?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 15:39:02+00:00): Hallo !i!. Bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34009245 sollte aus dem `building:materil` bestimmt ein `building:material` werden, oder? ;-) #typo
!i! (2017-10-02 16:46:26+00:00): Ja genau, verdammt! Hat aber schon jemand gefixt, vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
BCNorwich (2017-09-28 05:43:04+00:00): Hi, I've changed the open hours to OSM best practice. (I made the change because opening hours get a bit complicated and need to be presented exactly)
For future reference please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Regards Bernard
Myazyk (2019-03-25 19:34:53+00:00): Не Ю. Федьковича вулиця, а Імені Юрія Федьковича.
Вони там чомусь так називають, додаючи приставку "імені".
Якщо не знаєш місцевих нюансів, то не берись за редагування.
Тож прошу повернути назву назад
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 15:32:48+00:00): Hello Reno38. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5133728221 you have tagged `Accès` instead of `access`, right? But what is accessible by public? A node only tagged with `access` and nothing else isn't really helpful and says nothing. #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:29:02+00:00): Hello Jan Mattsson. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116646136 you have tagged `oof:levels` instead of `roof:levels`, right? #typo
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-29 23:04:15+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3419356 ?
RobJN (2022-10-30 19:46:25+00:00): No because I have no intent to go back there anytime soon. Try looking at https://www.google.com/search?q=hardcore+surface

"generally broken down bits of concrete, stones and bricks – which do not deteriorate or absorb water. It is the creation of construction waste"

Without going back I have no idea how compacted it was; likely a little but not much leaving a rough surface.
zstadler (2017-11-13 12:07:55+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52441910
zstadler (2021-07-11 21:28:09+00:00): The issue was resolved
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:22:26+00:00): Hello futurumspes. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32352660 you have tagged `name;en` (semicolon) instead of `name:en` (colon), right? #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:49:17+00:00): Hello dgitto. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4517131987 you have tagged `start-date` instead of `start_date`, right? #typo
dgitto (2017-09-29 17:59:22+00:00): Thanks a lot. Level0 typo
eggie (2017-09-27 21:10:33+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-27 21:26:29+00:00): Een description is niet voldoende.. 
Graag ook concreet je edits aangeven.
Kijk in de wiki kaarteigenschappen hoe je een afhaalrestaurant tagt.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features
Владимир К (2017-10-10 10:38:25+00:00): не надо прописывать адрес на каждой точке. адрес берется из здания, в котором находится точка.
eggie (2017-09-27 21:11:50+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-27 21:21:10+00:00): Oke.. nette edit.. wel graag concreet commentaar.. Dus playground toegevoegd .. wegen goedgelegd.
Henk Wiersema (2017-09-27 21:26:31+00:00): Zal ik doen. En mag dat in 't Nederlands? Morgen doe ik mee met de mapathon van het Kadaster in Zwolle.
eggie (2017-09-28 07:05:50+00:00): Wanneer je mapt ver weg.. dan is Engels gebruikelijk. Bij mappen voor HOT_osm is het commentaar al automatich ingevuld. De validators zijn ook internationaal... succes!
woodpeck (2017-09-27 21:17:32+00:00): I don't think this is right. Aldi Süd and Aldi Nord are not two different operators of the same brand; the brand is different (different logo, different products on the shelves, etc). I'm unhappy that someone from England feels empowered by Wikidata to make judgements about German supermarkets that he has in all likelihood not seen in person. I am also critical of seeing, in operator:wikidata, an external ID that is worthless without reference to the external source. I propose to remove both operator:wikidata and brand:wikidata.
pigsonthewing (2017-09-27 21:28:33+00:00): I'm not sure what you mean by "empowered by Wikidata", and the fact that I am from England does not prohibit me from editing an item in Germany, a country I have visited - and shopped in - often, so please tone down the frankly unacceptable nationalist rhetoric.

As to a "common brand", I note that the shared website https://www.aldi.com/ caries the logo of both companies.
R0bst3r (2017-09-28 06:03:30+00:00): Just a question: who needs all this *:wikidata, if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve? You can find brand and operator on this page. Mabe think about it ... the nationalistic rhetoric remembers me of some discussions as I edited some breweries I visited in London. So not very uncommon.
pigsonthewing (2017-09-28 07:02:07+00:00): " if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve?"

That case is false, so your question is moot.
pigsonthewing (2017-09-28 07:03:24+00:00): Also, I'm sorry to hear of your experience editing around London; that is equally unacceptable.
stephan75 (2018-01-16 16:17:46+00:00): Hallo to-map, in diesem Änderungssatz in HH-Bergedorf hast du u.a. folgende Relation für eine Abbiegebeschränkung bearbeitet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5323833 ... diese Relation hatte vor her auch insgesamt drei Elemente, jetzt nur noch ein einziges. Ist dir diese Änderung bewusst? Vermagst du diese Abbiege-Relation wieder zu vervollständigen?

Gruß, Stephan
to-map (2018-01-16 22:54:41+00:00): Hallo Stephan!
Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht. Ich habe nicht mit Absicht die Relationen ändern wollen und habe das jetzt hoffentlich richtig korrigiert. Bitte prüfe das nochmal für mich, da ich mir nicht sicher bin - Vielen Dank :-)
Viele Grüße aus Hamburg,
Jörg :-)
stephan75 (2018-01-17 19:53:23+00:00): Zumindest zeigt der Dienst unter https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/?zoom=14&lat=53.48689&lon=10.21247&layer=Grayscale&overlays=FTT dort keinen Fehler mehr an ... lässt sich da im Osten von Hamburg noch mehr finden? ;-)
to-map (2018-01-18 15:23:05+00:00): Hallo Stephan!
Den Link finde ich super und habe ihn gleich als Favorit abgespeichert. Warum nun beim P+R Parkhaus zwei Fehler sein sollen ist mir nicht ganz klar. Ich habe da zwar nochmal was geändert aber eher so auf Verdacht. Wenn du da was auffälliges finden solltest, dann ändere das mal bitte für mich. Kommst du eigentlich auch aus Hamburg? Ich bräuchte hier noch etwas Nachhilfe... .
Bergedorf / Lohbrügge ist übrigens mein Wohnsitz und versuche hier, in meinem Revier, etwas Ordnung zu schaffen.
Perfekt bin ich aber auch nicht.
Beste Grüße
Jörg :-)
eggie (2017-09-27 21:12:53+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-27 21:18:31+00:00): Ziet er netjes uit, maar... 
Alle gebouwen worden tegenwoordig geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG.
... met adres nodes en al. Je kunt dan een verzoek doen op het forum in het draadje Verzoek NBAG import en het BAG team importeert alles met adresgegevens en al.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
en dat zet je deze link erbij. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52425493#map=18/51.66953/5.02475
Doe je het zelf? Graag reactie
eggie (2017-09-28 08:21:43+00:00): BAG import verzoek gedaan.
arvdk (2017-09-28 09:03:45+00:00): Staat er op. Enkele huizen stonden precies dubbel in BAG. Op OSM staan ze nu enkel, met 2 BAG:ref values.
eggie (2017-09-28 09:16:57+00:00): thanks..
user_5359 (2017-09-28 18:02:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528225869#map=18/33.04627/-96.85521
millertime08 (2017-09-28 20:19:40+00:00): Thank you so much!!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:42:07+00:00): Hello Sheeprazhye. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528227620 you have introduced the new key `Qytra`. Should it be the `name`? #newkey
user_5359 (2017-09-28 17:58:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The ways without any tags are useless. I have delete this objects.
aceman444 (2020-07-12 14:43:03+00:00): Hi, why the change of name of locality "Pod polskou cestou" into "romska osada" ?
Jame Retief (2018-02-04 07:50:03+00:00): I use this road daily and though it is primarily used as a service road for the hospital, it is not a private road.
eggie (2017-09-28 07:11:45+00:00): Dii is een veel te groot gebied voor je edits. Het is moeilijk te controleren.
Wat waren je aanpassingen?
eggie (2017-09-28 07:16:41+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52426801
Hier is een fietspad half over de polder getrokken. Ik kijk er even naar
eggie (2017-09-28 07:21:05+00:00): De schade zit in Almere haven.
eggie (2017-09-28 07:30:04+00:00): Schade hersteld in Almere. Waarschijnlijk per abuis over provincie verschoven fietspad.
eggie (2017-09-28 07:52:28+00:00): Het is wonderlijk dat het met editor iD mogelijk is zoiets te doen. 
Wij raden editor JOSM aan.. Die heeft een validator die "verkeerde" uploads kan voorkomen.
Editor josm stap voor stap:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust. 
 
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
eggie (2017-09-28 07:34:16+00:00): Graag concreet aangeven wat je doet en dus je commentaar aanpassen.
eggie (2017-09-28 07:36:31+00:00): oke.. oneway=no is zeer ongebruikelijk in een wandelgebied. Zou je dat er af kunnen halen?
emvee (2018-01-07 13:18:37+00:00): Hoi,

Waarom heb je deze "crossings" verwijderd? Het voetpad kruist de straten dus moet er een crossing zijn, zie ook https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=nl&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch60=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=6&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=51.87673&lon=4.52894&zoom=17&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413
eggie (2018-01-08 08:51:39+00:00): Emvee, De verbindingsnodes heb ik maar vast aangebracht.
felipeeugenio (2018-03-26 22:32:30+00:00): Estimado, La ruta V-850 no puede ser más de ripio. A ratos muy mal tenida. Hoy me la comí entera pensando que era pavimentada. Cual fue su fuente? Para que no la use más. Agradecido. saludos
raito (2017-10-01 02:05:32+00:00): Hi. Just wanted to let you know about a partial revert I did on this changeset:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52525402
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:11:03+00:00): Hello Jack the Ripper. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175629572 you have tagged `hov:count` instead of `hov:minimum` (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/hov%3Aminimum), right?
Jack the Ripper (2017-10-01 01:03:35+00:00): Yes, I did.  Apparently I missed seeing hov:minimum in the wiki.  I'll get it changed.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-28 12:14:32+00:00): nyuriks,
You appear to be continuing with this mechanical edit despite being told to stop, and while discussion on the list and at e.g. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59910 is still going on.  You appear determined to force your views on the OSM community despite the fact that discussion is clearly still ongoing.
nyuriks (2017-09-28 19:34:00+00:00): SomeoneElse, this is becoming a harassing behavior.  Where do you see a mechanical edit?  This was a single node manual edit.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-28 20:01:26+00:00): It was submitted 10 seconds after the previous changeset and 20 seconds before the next.   That's unfortunately a common behaviour where people want to be seen to be doing "single" edits but in fact are just mechanically changing object after object without doing any sort of checks on what they're changing between uploads.
nyuriks (2017-09-28 20:16:04+00:00): Yes. In a group of 10 nodes. Each of which were checked by hand. I know the rules, and despite your accusations, I haven't broken any of them.  I specifically studied the mechanical edits policy.
nyuriks (2017-09-28 20:17:02+00:00): The group was checked, individually. Afterwards, they were uploaded one by one because they appeared in different places of the world.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-28 21:02:54+00:00): What about previous changes, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52369774 ?  Was that a mechanical edit?
nyuriks (2017-09-28 21:05:26+00:00): Yes they were. They were clearly marked as mechanical (with the word auto). And they followed the rules.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-28 21:34:34+00:00): > And they followed the rules.

Are you sure?  What you're supposed to do is laid out in some detail at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct , including a "Document_and_discuss_your_plans" section. Can you explain how you followed that?  As far as I can see almost none of it was, except for an initial discussion on talk@ (which met with a mixed reception).
nyuriks (2017-09-29 01:38:39+00:00): Which portion of it did I fail to address?  Global note, discussion, proceeded. Not a mixed response - every concern was answered on the email channel (except for one email that was not raising any reasonable objection as I later noted), and did not receive any further comment until restarted. If you feel this is not so, feel free to start a dispute.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-30 11:32:05+00:00): > Which portion of it did I fail to address?
Firstly and most importantly, you were mechanically adding while the discussion was going on, if not before.
In additon to that:
o You did not place your documentation on the wiki.
o You did not " work with [dissenters] to understand their reasons for objecting".
o You did not document your proposed edit at an English-language wiki page named "Automated edits/username".
o You did not  add it to Category:Automated edits log.
You therefore did not include:
o Who is making the change (preferably your real name and how to contact you, ideally e-mail address)
o A detailed description of the algorithm you will use to decide which objects are changed how
o Information about any consultation that you have conducted, with links to mailing list/forum posts or Wiki discussion pages
o When the change was made, or how frequently it is going to be repeated
o Information on how to "opt out"
Similarly, from the next section, you did not:
o Execute only a small number of edits with a new bot before requesting and waiting for feedback.
o Plan your changesets sensibly.
o Provide a means for mappers to "opt out" of your changes,
I'm guessing that you also didn't:
o For major changes (in the six-digit range or more), check with the admins
SomeoneElse (2017-09-30 11:42:01+00:00): Sorry to have to spell this out in quite such detail above but your comment "Which portion of it did I fail to address" suggests one of two things:
1) A complete failure to understand what other mappers, and OSM documentation, are saying to you.  
2) You're just being mendacious.  Perhaps you think that what other people in the community say "somehow doesn't apply to you"?  
Consistently (e.g. in changeset discussions) you've said things like "I won't do X any more" and have then gone on to do X again and again.  One of these must be true.  Which is it?