piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freebeer (2018-03-11 20:08:18+00:00): They were badly positioned and without info.
Looks like it was an attempt to point out the FeWo at Schumanngasse 50: Vienna Top Apartment (their own name) which is not yet mapped to render.
(Fabelhaft?  in Wien?  Пфффф.)
Thanks for cleaning up the maps.me mess.
JJIglesias (2018-03-09 23:27:49+00:00): El Puente Gemelo de las Americas YA NO ESTA EN CONSTRUCCION. Esta abierto a pruebas, y su ancho es de 15 Mts segun la data publicada por la Alcaldia de La PAZ
5m4u9 (2018-03-10 00:50:33+00:00): para mi sigue en construcción porque no sabamos si resiste cargas o no, y si necesita arreglar, el construction tambien nos ayuda a que no permita ruteo sobre esa ruta
DD1GJ (2018-03-10 09:51:40+00:00): Revert 57046113 57045945 57045448 57045211 57045035 57044814 , Pokémon-Vandalismus.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
Peilscheibe (2018-03-12 18:16:19+00:00): Hallo Jojo4u, 
das Schild https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3659148041 steht ja immer noch da, was willst Du hier mit Deinem tagging, insbesondere auch bezügl. den Auswirkungen auf die Richtung Nordwesten folgenden Straßensegmente aussagen?
Peilscheibe (2018-04-17 17:49:48+00:00): Noch eine Frage: die Attribute bicycle und foot=discouraged an Segmenten der B 27, sind die eine subjektive Einschätzung oder irgendwie beschildert?
Jojo4u (2018-04-21 12:10:37+00:00): Das Schild war kurzzeitig entfernt, das habe ich 2x geprüft weil ich es auch nicht glauben konnte. Mittlerweile steht ja wieder.
Discouraged ist subjektive Einschätzung. 
foot: Es ist für Straßen wo Fußgänger nicht verboten sind und ohne Bürgersteig innerhalb 5m Abstand, aber wo aufgrund der Situation kein Mensch entlang gehen würde.
Bicycle: Dort wo man genau wissen sollte worauf man sich einlässt und es keineswegs etwas für Durchschnittsradler ist.
Jojo4u (2018-04-21 13:00:08+00:00): Für den Pragsattel habe ich die Tags nach meiner Einschätzung auch mal verteilt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58289889 

Es hängt vor allem daran:
* Wie man Radwege in Gegenrichtungen bei getrennten Fahrbahnen handhabt 
* Wieviel Umweg zumutbar ist
Peilscheibe (2018-04-24 13:31:02+00:00): Das ist ja in verschiedener Hinsicht problematisch.
- Jemand anderes kann das anders sehen und ändert oder löscht das nach seinem Gusto. Was Mensch A für ungeeignet hält, findet Mensch B ganz prima.
- Eben deshalb ist das eine Nullaussage. Man kann damit nichts anfangen, z. B. um ein Router-Profil zu konfigurieren.
- Es geht nicht mit den Prinzipien "verifiability" und "on the ground" zusammen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice).
- *=discouraged ist wie folgt dokumentiert: "A legal right of way exists [...] but usage is officially discouraged [...]. Only if marked by a traffic sign (subjective otherwise). " Das ist ja hier nicht der Fall (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access). 
- bicycle=* und foot=* sind access-tags und dienen der Erfassung von Zugangsbeschränkungen. Sie sind nicht dazu gedacht, die jeweilige Eignung eines Wegs zu erfassen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle)

Ich finde also nicht, daß man das weiter verbreiten sollte. Das läuft grundlegenden Prinzipien von OSM zuwider.
Lokai (2018-03-10 16:32:10+00:00): Hallo Badg0n,

ich greife mal dieses CS und diesen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568371940 Beispielhaft heraus. 
Falls der Friedhof öffentlich ist, ist access=private nicht richtig. Der Schlüssel horse=no ist wohl sinnvoll, dann sollte Zeichen 258 dort angebracht sein.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland
Badg0n (2018-03-11 16:01:59+00:00): Hi, Danke für die Hinweise. Der Friedhof ist öffentlich. Ich habe die Wege angepasst - die Standardwerte treffen zu.
Lokai (2018-03-17 06:05:28+00:00): Bitte und Danke. Viel Spaß
nevw (2018-03-10 08:20:26+00:00): Seems to be an edit war on the correct name for this beach. Regardless of that, you have named a section of the coastline instead of the name on the beach polygon. Is that intentional?
nevw (2018-03-10 08:51:27+00:00): Please ignore my comment. The beaches multipolygon is incorrect and needs splitting up to individual named beaches.
I will do that when I have more info.
nevw (2018-03-10 09:06:25+00:00): I think the individual beach polygons and names are correct now. I will check some of it further tomorrow.
tomasy (2018-03-11 21:49:33+00:00): Såg att du hade tagit bort Duved Alpin Hostel. Finns inte den byggnaden?
Merkurius (2018-03-11 22:27:36+00:00): Byggnaden är kvar men det är ombyggt till lägenheter. Jag vet för jag bor i en av dem :)
archie (2018-03-11 23:05:17+00:00): Du menar hotellverksamheten är avvecklad och byggnaden omvandlad till boende? Varför har du då raderat hela byggnaden? Du bor i något som inte finns på kartan. Det är byggnaden som är borta.
tomasy (2018-03-12 18:54:24+00:00): Mycket bra att du tog bort att det inte är ett hotell men byggnaden rök med av bara farten. Om man gör flera saker så händer det lätt. Eller du kanske vill bo avskilt ;-) under radarn. 
Hoppas du inte tar det inte för kritik det var en vänlig fråga. Tänkte först att det hade brunnit ner. 
Fortsätt bara.
ovruni (2023-09-13 21:00:22+00:00): Aqui se han agregado objetos con solo nombre descriptivos y un limite inexistente
abakus_uploader (2018-03-10 23:31:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ovruni (2023-09-13 21:20:16+00:00): Aqui se han agregado parques inexistentes
Carlos Brys (2018-03-10 14:14:59+00:00): El mapa es un espacio comunitario donde se vuelca información relevante para todo el mundo.
No es un lugar para jugar, ni para poner datos personales u opiniones.
Su edición está considerada como vandalismo y eliminada inmediatamente.
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-10 20:10:19+00:00): Hi duce1922, welcome to OSM.

I think something went wrong with one of your mapped ways here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568382369

Can you fix it? Thanks.
audtr (2023-07-07 15:28:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3768371
mbethke (2018-03-15 03:09:36+00:00): Are you sure this is an actual artwork by that strange name?
gscholz (2018-03-30 08:08:41+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding a lot of way intersections:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.07319&lat=0.09030&zoom=16&opacity=0.78&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
Hjart (2018-03-10 07:40:39+00:00): Please note that the area was a park before this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6637577
SHARCRASH (2018-05-09 21:37:54+00:00): Hello! Can i suggest you to not create too many nodes on straight lines and also not be too picky about precision like plotting the line around each tree, please? This adds so many nodes that are not really necessary, adding also a lot of data. In my opinion we have to consider this to avoid to overload little portable devices using OSM data. Thanks for your consideration! :)
SHARCRASH (2018-05-09 21:38:03+00:00): example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568389164/
SHARCRASH (2018-05-09 22:01:09+00:00): another example also this time you lacked actuallu
y in precision because you plotted this neadleleaved forest on the other side of the track but actually the way is its limit, often parcels are limited by ways, waterways or other natural landmarks:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564051076/
Diseret (2018-05-09 23:10:09+00:00): Hello, thanks for the advice, I migh have gotten a bit overzealous doing this. Sometimes it's no clear where to put the limit and making a lot of nodes isn't hard with JOSM so I stuck to the borders closely. I hadn't thought about the data size problem.

I should have moved the tracks while doing this to keep it coherent. Still learning. I will try less nodes in the future.
Diseret (2018-05-09 23:13:36+00:00): There are a few times where I traced things on 2015 imagery because it was taken when deciduous trees have no leaves and then corrected the position with 2016 imagery, which might cause things to be slightly off where there is strong slopes.
SHARCRASH (2018-05-10 08:16:18+00:00): I understand, i've had that same excessive zeal also. ;) 

Indeed some photo images have an offset because of steep hills or tilted satellite image shots (check if the walls of a close building are very visible) and need to be corrected. It's an issue i've realized only last years. I was wondering why after having corrected the offset, there are still some areas not aligned correctly. Some people even get fooled of the trees shadows HAHA maybe because their screen's brightness is too dark.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-04-09 20:08:16+00:00): Jakie jest źródło na to że https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531436020/history jest planowana w takim przebiegu?
Teester (2018-03-13 11:50:45+00:00): You asked for this changeset to be reviewed.

The tagging is fine, but according to both the GSGS3906 map (http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/?zoom=18&lat=52.91616&lon=-8.89138&layers=B00TFFFFFFFFFFFF) and http://www.aughty.org/pdf/townlands3_2.pdf, this is called 'Kilvilly Children's Burial Ground'.  You may want to make sure you have added the correct name to it.
NorthCarto (2018-03-15 09:04:14+00:00): Good suggestion.  I'm going to look into this.  The old maps say Kilvilly, but the modern eircode map (https://finder.eircode.ie/#/map) says Cillin.  I'll try to contact someone who lives in the area and get the lowdown.  Thanks for the link to the overlay.
NorthCarto (2018-03-15 17:26:50+00:00): A helpful stranger on Reddit tells me that "Cillin" is a term, not a title.  It originally meant 'enclosure' or 'cell for prisoners or monks', but was also applied to special graveyards for unbaptized children and others who could not be buried on consecrated ground: https://www.scribd.com/document/18686459/The-origins-of-the-Irish-Cillin-the-segregation-of-infant-burials-within-an-early-medieval-enclosure-at-Carrowkeel-Co-Galway.  Changing to "Killvilly Cemetery", but will put historic details in metadata.  Thanks for review.
NorthCarto (2018-03-15 17:27:52+00:00): You may find this useful: http://webgis.archaeology.ie/historicenvironment/
GOwin (2018-03-10 05:10:48+00:00): Thank you! Kudos for using OpenStreetMap's to create a better map of your community..

If you have any questions at all, please feel free to get in touch. You might be doubtful about a particular tag, or would like to clarify their use. Or perhaps, you have ideas you want to flesh out  to improve your neighbourhood map. Or maybe  just want to know more about OSM.  

When you have a few minutes to spare, try the browser-based editor called iD, to edit the map of your community. You may find it quicker and easier if you need to update a lot of information on the map.

There's this concise tips page for Philippine contributors: https://telegra.ph/Awesome-OSM-Tips--Tricks-01-28

Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: https://telegra.ph/OpenStreetMap-LoCo-channels-in-the-Philippines-02-15

Welcome and best regards, in behalf of the OSM contributors' community
GOwin
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:38:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of oneway=reversible (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#Time_conditional_restrictions). Exists these time conditional restrictions? Please add them.
viloan (2018-03-10 02:35:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
stephankn (2018-03-17 11:17:57+00:00): you added many ways with a temporary highway=road. Please take care to do a correct tagging, otherwise data can't be used in OSM. seems most are agricultural, so highway=track
literan (2018-03-10 12:43:46+00:00): не совсем понимаю, зачем по три-четыре раза поверх рисовать одну и ту же дорогу. Поудалял все лишнее, что вы нарисовали.
Supaplex (2019-02-08 16:30:17+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
CloCkWeRX (2018-03-11 13:44:09+00:00): Are you sure it's Rocky Hill Track, not Wandilla Track?
freebeer (2018-03-10 14:12:03+00:00): Hallo,
Here in Camillus Park, you have drawn footpaths that immediately arouse suspicion.
You were using Bing Satellite imagery with full tree cover.
Can you try instead selecting the Mapbox aerial imagery which clearly shows the actual position of the footpaths, with no leaves on the trees to block the view?
I think you will be able to do a much better job with that, including tracing a major path that now meets up with the road to the west of the park.
If you do not feel you can see the paths well enough, perhaps someone with more experience looking at imagery where the paths are partly covered with fallen leaves may be able to help.
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:36:33+00:00): Is this really the street name or has the information about the assigned house numbers been added to the street name?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:50:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
Russ McD (2018-09-25 01:23:54+00:00): Just wondering why all the building's have been drawn twice, one on top of the other ... and you say "dont change" !
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-12 17:08:14+00:00): No need to add the operator to the name, especially when already listed in the operator tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57050046
mueschel (2018-03-10 15:44:05+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
On this POI you added the tags
roof:material =concrete
roof:material_1 =tiles
roof:material_2 =steel
Using the same tag several times with an '_1' and '_2' should be avoided. You can add all the options to one tag:
roof:material = concrete;tiles;steel

Cheers, Jan
freebeer (2018-03-10 13:55:57+00:00): Hallo,
Here you deleted two roads, one Acadia Street which can be seen obviously was wrong, but also Sioux Street north-south.
That one can be seen present in all available aerial imageries -- under construction in the oldest, and ir seems well-used to give access to unmapped school car parking.
Does that no longer exist, and what about the carpark areas?
Thanks
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:31:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description (with defined values) of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one a free text description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:30:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you please add the booth values?
Trainguyrom (2018-03-11 19:35:32+00:00): I Will probably go out and check the house numbers today.
archie (2018-03-10 07:28:37+00:00): Some meters apart, there is already a post-box on the map. Is yours an unnecessary duplicate? Or are there actually two post-boxes som meters appart?
osm-pascal (2018-03-10 19:09:12+00:00): Indeed, I was tagging from OSMand and didnt see them in there. But you are totally right, it was a duplicate from my side. Also i realized i used the wrong tag. I will remove the POI.
osm-pascal (2018-03-10 19:10:40+00:00): Thanks for spotting this!
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:23:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I must revert the whole change set. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1390120340/history
eggie (2018-03-10 06:59:48+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:20:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
eggie (2018-03-10 07:11:43+00:00): Etiënne.. de poel heb ik in een zgn. multipolygoon gezet als "inner" van het gras. . Water "mag" eigenlijk niet zomaar getekend worden op andere landuse.
Etiënne Thomassen (2018-03-10 07:53:23+00:00): Dankjewel! Ik begrijp het. Ik was me al af aan het vragen of dit zo kon. Maar polygonen in polygonen moeten dus met behulp van relaties gemaakt worden? Niet door eerst een gat te maken in het grasland?
eggie (2018-03-10 08:06:15+00:00): Nee. dat zou niets helpen, want dan zou je dat gat ook in een mp moeten zetten. 
Water rendert overigens wel op gras, maar niet op bos. Dan zie je de bomen in het water.
MP maken gaat het simpelste met editor JOSM .. Wij raden deze editor aan. iD is wel erg beperkt en plakt bovendien overal aan.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
en
https://blog.mapbox.com/become-a-power-mapper-619077da4ef4
Etiënne Thomassen (2018-03-10 08:48:11+00:00): Merci! Ik ga het bestuderen. Ik was eigenlijk al behoorlijk onder de indruk van iD...
eggie (2018-03-10 08:53:00+00:00): Nou.. dan gaat er nog een wereld voor je open. Je kunt overigens beide editor gebruiken.
Ik gebruik potlatch2 voor simpele veranderingen en josm voor het echte werk. iD is een beetje een kleine ramp, al wordt er nog steeds aan ontwikkeld.
andi9876 (2018-03-10 18:27:11+00:00): Dear, why u change the residential area to a park?
Reverted.
philippec (2019-11-05 21:51:00+00:00): Het is Huninvoetweg
escada (2019-11-06 10:07:58+00:00): Pas gerust aan
monotar (2018-05-14 11:01:47+00:00): offizielle Rückstufung der Hauptstraße ist wohl erfolgt? Aber die Straße war bei meinem letzten Besuch keine Residential, sondern immer noch eine tertiary, oder gilt dort inzwischen rechts vor links?
shogun (2018-05-14 17:19:24+00:00): die Rückstufung der Hauptstraße habe ich nach einem Hinweis hier gändert, nur fälschlicher weise als Residential. Ist ja eine gut ausgebaute Straße. Habe es gerade richtig eingetragen
mavl (2018-03-10 09:48:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Если это пешеходная зона, то тогда вместо удаления лучше было бы обозначить этот участок как пешеходную дорожку (highway=footway).  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
Jakka (2018-03-10 10:13:30+00:00): adding extra tag amenity=pharmacy
see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:How_to_map_a:A
Supaplex (2018-03-11 01:18:27+00:00): 請不要變動台灣的de facto狀態，目前台灣有自己的行政區劃 (https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/臺灣行政區劃)。
你已經被提報到Data Working Group，最嚴重結果帳號將被封禁。
OpenStreetMap計畫依據現實狀況來繪製地圖，包括各國疆界，而不是聲稱的國界。
Supaplex (2018-03-11 01:21:53+00:00): Please do not change the Taiwan de facto status. Currently Taiwan has its own administrative divisions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_divisions_of_Taiwan). Your behavior let your account was reported to the Data Working group. The most crucial consequence was banned. 
We use the de facto status to draw things on OpenStreetMap, including the national boundary, not the claimed boundary.
Supaplex (2018-03-11 01:22:35+00:00): 請不要更動台灣的de facto status，最嚴重的結果導致你的帳號被Data Working Group封禁。
Supaplex (2018-03-11 01:24:39+00:00): Please don't change Taiwan de facto status. The most serious result due to your misbehavior is your account banned by the project.
ibanez (2018-03-10 18:13:18+00:00): Dankeschön!
Road–Runner (2018-04-10 10:21:57+00:00): Hallo, das ist eher ein Verkaufsautomat, kein Getränkeladen. Aber ich weiß, leider findet man auf maps.me nicht immer die richtige Katgorie.
Road–Runner (2018-04-10 10:23:15+00:00): Besser ist es vlt, direkt auf
https://www.openstreetmap.org
Dinge auf der Karte einzutragen.
lg
eggie (2018-03-10 08:50:11+00:00): Etiënne.. probeer zo'n bakker op de BAG adresnode bij te taggen. Dan is adres gekoppeld aan shop. Dat geldt eigenlijk voor alle instellingen en winkels.
Etiënne Thomassen (2018-03-10 09:00:42+00:00): Ok. Ik denk dat ik het begrijp. Ik heb mijn punt verwijderd en aan het BAG adres punt shop:bakery getagd en de naam toegevoegd.
Dank weer!
user_5359 (2018-03-11 19:18:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t paint a way twice. If there is a dead end, then paint a new path. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568436019/history
eggie (2018-03-10 08:43:19+00:00): review.. Dat zuidelijke voetbalveldje staat keurig in een MP. De landuse=residential van Hunsel heb ik even  helemaal losgemaakt van alle elementen. Dat kan problemen geven als iemand er mee gaat schuiven. Dan krijg je vreemde effecten.
eggie (2018-03-10 08:44:35+00:00): Denk er wel om steeds het commentaar aan te passen bij upload.
Etiënne Thomassen (2018-03-10 08:51:26+00:00): Dank. Idd vervelend dat ik de omschrijving van de wijziging niet heb veranderd. Verschillende typen 'landuse' waren me nog niet opgevallen'
Jose Luis Infante (2018-03-10 10:52:30+00:00): Gràcies per la teva edició. Només un apunt: les entrades de la biblioteca no haurien d'estar sobre el carrer, només a l'edifici.
A Mollerussa hi ha molta feina per fer. Pel que veig, hi ha molts carrers que no tenen la seva denominació ("carrer de", "avinguda de", etc).
Si et cal suport o tens qualsevol dubte, hi ha una comunitat catala d'usuaris d'OSM a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Catalan
Salut!
tonyf1 (2018-03-16 22:51:25+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your map contributions. You have added a Pet Shop called Crocodile Farm, it sounds more like a tourist attraction. Also the satellite photos (which may be out of date) show no buildings or taks. What is here?
tonyf1 (2018-03-16 22:52:02+00:00): taks=tanks
eggie (2018-03-10 09:24:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Jip.. probeer op de adresnodes te taggen en niet op het gebouw svp.
Ook graag commentaar bij je upload.