piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
yasslay (2022-10-07 10:34:12+00:00): Hello!

Please try to adhere to the good practice of keeping your changesets local in size (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets) in the future, please!

Kind regards,
yasslay
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
MxxCon (2022-10-07 19:25:13+00:00): Hello.
"Island", "Statue" and "Park" are part of those features' names, not just descriptors, so shouldn't they be capitalized too?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127144778
kuhni74 (2023-08-04 16:53:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226293405 is certainly not a grade1 track, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:tracktype
By the way, it would be helpful for other mappers if you use a changeset comment in all your work.
eggie (2022-10-07 12:28:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-07 21:20:29+00:00): PB contact..
vool (2022-10-07 11:26:38+00:00): 👍
*Martin* (2023-06-05 08:25:50+00:00): Ahoj. Prosim nepridavaj vymyslene mosty iba preto, ze sa potok krizuje s lesnou cestou.
Jakka (2022-10-10 07:05:24+00:00): je vois deux fois "École communale" un est double ,
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-16 09:48:54+00:00): سلام
ضمن تقدیر از زحمات شما
ثبت محدوده همراه با گره که نام محدوده را توضیح میدهد، بیشتر در مورد شهر، روستا، پادگانها و ... استفاده میگردد. شما در ادارات هم به همین صورت ثبت انجام داده اید که محدوده ساختمان و نام با سایر برچسبهایش کافیست و نیازی به ثبت گره جداگانه ندارد.
پایدار باشید، علی یارتان
SekeRob (2022-10-07 11:15:05+00:00): Just 20 issues resolved in 1 square area. To include the unclosed pedestrian area.
eggie (2022-10-08 09:01:18+00:00): Dag Gerco.. Je vraagt feedback..
Eén opmerking.. 
Wanneer er geen G7 bord staat gebruiken we highway=path ipv footway. Het is dan ook open gesteld voor fietsers.
Het fietspad aan de oostzijde heb ik aangepast. Dat loopt niet met een haakse bocht door de tuin van nr 4 
Wanneer ik op Obliek kijk is het daar nog allemaal G13 . Misschien dat het nieuwste stuk fietspad toch G11 is nu. Dat zou wel logisch zijn. Of ze zijn het bord vergeten om te wisselen.
Dus eigenlijk twee opmerkingen.. :)
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-08 09:15:03+00:00): Nog even gekeken met Obliek 2022. De Heuvelweg is tegenwoordig allemaal G13. Ik heb het aangepast. 

Gr eggie
GercoKees (2022-10-10 07:42:52+00:00): oke, top, dank voor je uitleg ook...
ik fietste er voorbij, deed achteraf wat kleine aanpassingen, maar wist
niet meer goed hoe het precies zat...
groetjes, Gerco-Kees
GercoKees (2022-10-10 07:47:29+00:00): Oh, and btw, dat Obliek 2022, is dat ergens te benaderen?
eggie (2022-10-10 07:56:52+00:00): Hoi Gerco-Kees.. Je hebt een licentie nodig van Slagboom & Peeters.
Even een mailtje sturen naar Lachgast.
Die heeft dan wat gegevens nodig zoals je naam en emailadres.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lachgast

Zie ook 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71454

Succes,
eggie
eggie (2022-10-10 07:58:22+00:00): Wanneer je bent aangemeld kun je uiteindelijk met je gegevens hier inloggen
https://login.geoapps.nl/Account/Login
eggie (2022-10-10 08:12:25+00:00): .. Niet alle OBLIEK foto's zijn van 2022 overigens..  Deze toevallig wel.
GercoKees (2022-10-10 08:13:52+00:00): Thanx!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SimonPoole (2022-10-20 10:35:22+00:00): Ich hab die Mehrfacheinträge für die Firma entfernt, dass ist definitiv nicht sinnvoll.

Firmennamen in anderen Sprachen können mit name:en name:fr etc am gleichen Objekt eingetragen werden.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
AgusQui (2023-05-18 13:30:28+00:00): Este reservorio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/670848938 no corresponde el tag water, ya que nunca hay agua, sólo cuando desborda el Maldonado, el tag reservorio sin water está bien etiquetado. Por favor leer la wiki, preguntar, investigar antes de modificar ciegamente siguiendo las recomendaciones del editor iD que no siempre son las correctas.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
bxl-forever (2022-10-08 08:43:27+00:00): Écrivez « École » et pas « Ecole » svp. :-)
Laurent Poncelet (2022-10-10 05:46:41+00:00): Les lettres majuscules ne sont pas accentuées... faute d'orthographe.
Jakka (2022-10-10 07:01:07+00:00): Est-ce que les majuscules prennent un accent ?
Il est désormais recommandé d'accentuer les majuscules. L'Académie française elle-même est formelle : « En français, l'accent a pleine valeur orthographique
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Cartographer10 (2022-10-08 12:14:38+00:00): Hey,

Een kleine tip, voeg access=destination toe aan dergelijke brandgangetjes. Dat voorkomt dat navigatie voor wandelaars mensen over deze kleine brandgangetjes stuurt. Dat is onwenselijk. Deze paadjes zijn echt achterommetjes voor de bewoners.

Mvg,
Vincent
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-08 17:28:58+00:00): "onwenselijk" is een persoonlijke, subjectieve mening. Objectiever gezien zijn deze paden vrij begaanbaar, dus dat is hoe ze op de kaart horen te staan; zonder access tags (of met access=yes).
jrnptrs (2022-10-08 18:32:16+00:00): Deze paden zijn gewoon publiek toegankelijk.
PT-53 (2022-10-08 10:13:53+00:00): Hallo Daniel22Ka,
Du hast diese Zufahrt 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38750084/history
von unclassified auf track heruntergestuft.
Warum?
Das ist eine Zufahrt zu diesem Bauernhof
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208033388#map=19/48.22691/9.84798
und zum MobiPark Laupheim
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462129406#map=18/48.21235/9.84105
mit entsprechendem Verkehrsaufkommen.

Diesen Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208033392/history
und weitere hast Du mit
- name=Dürnachhöfe
versehen.
Stehen dort entspr. Straßennamenschilder?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Daniel22Ka (2022-10-08 10:20:07+00:00): Moin
Ich glaub das war dann ein Fehler von mir über die App herunterstufen wollte ich sie nicht, eigentlich ergänzen.

Ich hab vor Ort einen Anwohner gefragt wie die Straßen heißen und er hat mir gesagt "Dürnachhöfe"
Daniel22Ka (2022-10-08 10:26:33+00:00): Hab es zurück gemacht und die Straße eingetragen.
PT-53 (2022-10-08 11:26:00+00:00): Nochmals die Frage: Stehen da Straßennamenschilder?
Daniel22Ka (2022-10-08 11:28:41+00:00): Nein stehen keine
PT-53 (2022-10-08 11:32:10+00:00): Dann lösche bitte die falschen Namen wieder.
Du kannst als Hinweis
- noname=yes
eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-10-08 16:06:10+00:00):  falsche, nicht existierende Straßennamen gelöscht
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-07 19:20:17+00:00): What is this survey date for?
b-unicycling (2022-10-07 22:19:03+00:00): to know how recent the data is
rarad74 (2022-10-08 19:46:31+00:00): Slut. Te rog nu folosi prescurtari, sau daca gasesti asa ceva poti sa le modifici. Pentru denumiri pe openstreetmap , in Romania nu se folosesc prescurtari la nume de strazi in special decat daca este un drum foarte lung. Nu prea se prinde nimnei ce inseamna DF sau P Dranitei. Multumesc.
johnnybegoode (2022-10-08 19:56:33+00:00): Cine umbla prin pădure este imposibil sa nu știe ce înseamnă DF (Drum forestier). Dar dacă zici ca e problema, modific. La pârâiașe, la fel. Seara buna!
Dimitar155 (2022-10-07 15:49:44+00:00): Здравей

Улица в жилищна зона означава че има знак за такава зона (https://elitps.net/produkti-i-uslugi/d15/). В случая няма такъв знак и следва да бъде обикновена улица.

Поздрави,
Митко
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:26:20+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1486126280/history
solitone (2022-10-10 07:52:06+00:00): Ok, no problem with it, but, in brief, how should I tag it? They are fountains like this:
http://rete.comuni-italiani.it/foto/2008/102690/view
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-20 17:42:00+00:00): Not sure - I mentioned it as example at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Deprecate_man_made%3Ddrinking_fountain#Examples
MxxCon (2022-10-07 19:31:05+00:00): Hello.
I believe you made a mistake here. The left and right most lanes are just parked cars, not moving lanes. So it's 2+3 layout.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127149322
flaviusm_telenav (2022-10-10 07:32:41+00:00): Hello, thanks for the information. I re-edited the lanes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127149322
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-08 06:45:21+00:00): Hi, just a test edit?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
geozeisig (2022-11-12 07:32:36+00:00): Hallo,
die Windkraftanlagen in dem Windpark Genshagener Heide gehören schon kleineren Windparks an. Diese haben unterschiedliche Betreiber.  Warum diese doppelte Zuordnung? Gibt es im web eine Seite wo das aufgelistet ist?

Eine Übersicht hat man bei
https://openinframap.org/#13.25/52.34448/13.2553/L,O,P,S,T

Gruß Dieter
Pawix99 (2022-10-07 14:47:04+00:00): Czemu zmieniłeś ul. Konwaliową na drogę lokalną, pomimo, że została tam ustanowiona strefa zamieszkania? Dodatkowo opisuj lepiej swoje zmiany.
olekkkk (2022-10-08 05:30:39+00:00): Bo tu obok mieszkam, i wydaję mi się ż e nie ma tam strefy zamieszkania, ale sprawdzę. Dzięki
maro21 (2022-10-08 19:58:04+00:00): W miejsce restauracji jest teraz kościół?
Czemu denomination=baptist? Na swojej stronie piszą, że nie zaliczają się do żadnej denominacji.
olekkkk (2022-10-10 05:49:36+00:00): wybrałem najbardziej zbliżoną denominacje z listy.
Langlaeufer (2022-10-07 13:19:05+00:00): Im Luftbild ist ein Schutzstreifen. Ist der nicht mehr da?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127150437
Langlaeufer (2022-10-07 13:23:53+00:00): o.k scheint nicht mehr zu existieren.
eggie (2022-10-07 20:34:47+00:00): Dag Sebastiaan. Lijkt mij correcter zo.
Groet
eggie
janolezab (2022-10-07 13:22:52+00:00): This changeset seems to follow-up a satirical czech annexation of Kaliningrad. It should be reverted.
SimonPoole (2022-10-07 14:42:10+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127156042

Next time you notice a vandal pls notify the DWG via the "Report user" function.
SimonPoole (2022-10-07 14:42:47+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127156003
SimonPoole (2022-10-07 14:43:14+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127155985
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-08 06:45:35+00:00): Hi, just a test edit?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
AkuAnakTimur (2022-10-07 15:28:26+00:00): You might want to re-check your edit: I wonder why there's a node/point that's right on Null Island coordinate (0, 0)
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-09 14:10:40+00:00): Should be reverted.
SimonPoole (2022-10-07 14:43:49+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127155985
gendy54 (2022-10-07 22:33:45+00:00): Bonsoir,

Pour les commentaires de changeset, merci de compléter par autre chose que "Maj" sur tous les changeset et de donner ainsi plus d'infos.
Voir: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications + le reste des bonnes pratiques.
SimonPoole (2022-10-07 14:44:20+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127155928
SimonPoole (2022-10-07 14:45:17+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127155901
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-10-08 13:27:39+00:00): This segment should be 4 lanes (2 forward, 2 backward) since the transition starts at the beginning (see width:lanes)
andreeab_telenav (2022-10-12 13:45:24+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for correcting it. You are right.
Best.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-10-12 13:48:25+00:00): No problem, thanks!
mueschel (2022-10-28 09:01:44+00:00): Hi,
you used a strange key here: "id_arturbmoz,fcm" - reference numbers usually use a tag of the form "ref:XYZ". Could you check & change this?
philh-591 (2022-11-16 17:46:15+00:00): Hello, 

My changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129001153 
has updated way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293516967 in your changeset that this comment is linked to.  

I don't know what your correspondent is referring to as 'private' here, unless they mean some presumably private parking with gated access underneath the Résidence (see new changeset).  The alleyway/service road is definitely public and one-way, with its own 20 km. zone plate.  

Cordially, 
PhilH-591
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-11-17 15:36:00+00:00): Hello! 
We received a feedback from the user that this road is private, also he added a photo of sign with the "private". But if you know that the road is not private, then we may have received incorrect information.  
Thanks for your corrections!
user_2066394 (2022-10-07 21:43:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/872387352
layer=-1 eher weniger, vermutlich dann bündig tunnel=building_passage
Frans S (2022-10-14 12:53:48+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway ---
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127154724
highflyer74 (2022-10-08 06:59:08+00:00): Moin! Ich bin mir nicht sicher, wie das entstanden ist, aber dieses MP (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5745025) ist seit längerem Defekt, weil sich mehrere Inners überschnitten. Jetzt sieht es ebenfalls sehr merkwürdig aus. Es ist auch eher ungewöhnlich, dass dort fast jedes Haus ein kleines landuse=residential um sich hat, aber das ist nicht grundsätzlich falsch.

Aktuell sind die "herausgetrennten" landuse=residential noch Teil der MP-Relation, obwohl sie außerhalb des Haupt-Outers liegen (https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.83929&lat=53.30171&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways).

Was ist denn deine Intention bei der Änderung gewesen?

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Frans S (2022-12-18 11:54:29+00:00): Hallo Jan.
Bedankt voor het mappen in dit project.
Een paar opmerkingen. 
In landelijk gebied worden wegen niet als 'residential'getagd.  Unclassified is beter, of als track, wanneer het alleen naar akkerland gaat.
En, vergeet niet de errors te corrigeren die vermeld worden in de issue driehoek voordat je je mappings upload.
Vriendelijke groeten.
GinaroZ (2022-10-07 18:07:00+00:00): Have the cafe and bike shop in Tiso gone?