piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-10-23 10:44:31+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92924746
Frans S (2020-10-23 10:43:27+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92924830
Frans S (2020-10-23 10:42:10+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.
They lack the squaring of the rectangular buildings
Please let a highway not connec to a building
Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92924859
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-23 02:56:17+00:00): Obviously wasn't paying attention when I was fixing up the node - that the shop area was also marked as the IGA.
Frans S (2020-10-23 10:40:06+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92924890
Frans S (2020-10-23 10:38:41+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92924907
ovruni (2020-10-23 03:21:33+00:00): Hola, en esta edición se agregó la etiqueta highway=motorway_junction , sin embargo esta etiqueta se encuentra destinada para nodos de salidas de autopistas [0], por lo cual he revertido esta edición.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction
Frans S (2020-10-23 08:47:51+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria. In general you follow the outlnes rather good, but you did not square the rectangular buildings.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-10-23 09:29:18+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria. Roughly you follow the outlines, but did not square buildings. 
Round huts should be mapped as round hut. See attached document how to do that

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
mdelatorre (2020-10-24 23:04:02+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM. I reviewed your changeset and determined that can be IMPROVED. Both names can be mapped. You can use tag alt_name
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92925906
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-23 05:30:39+00:00): Hi, it's recommended to re-use existing ways instead of deleting and re-creating them. (like you did for way 173254626 - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92926850
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-23 05:53:04+00:00): Also, when doing footpaths parallel to a road (see: sidewalk). It's best to use the footway=sidewalk tag along with highway=footpath in the Tags section. (section between "Fields" and "Relations")
osmowm87 (2020-10-23 07:50:17+00:00): Understood - will do
Dimacn (2020-10-23 17:20:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Пожалуйста удалите текст из тега name
roptat (2020-10-23 16:40:09+00:00): Thanks for your change! I noticed it because you requested a review. It looks correct, but you can make it even better.

You can map the pumps (the other building I guess?) as a gas station (in the editor, click the building, then the back arrow on the top left, and select "gas station").  That building is probably a convenience store, so you can map it as such too, by selecting it, back arrow, and selecting "convenience store" :)

You can also add the parking and lanes to make it perfect.
roptat (2020-10-23 17:27:11+00:00): Hi,

I took the liberty to improve this area a bit: I replaced the parking point by a parking area, and added more precision to the curb, making sure it follows the imagery and doesn't cross roads.
pallih (2020-10-23 13:15:35+00:00): Hi.

I reverted this change (and changeset 92927840). The removal of boundary:protected_area tag is wrong. The changeset message suggests that this was a change made in error. Did you intend to make this change? All the best, pallih.
ZeLonewolf (2020-10-23 13:19:04+00:00): No worries, thanks.
Lukasz Piekarski (2020-10-30 14:48:40+00:00): Please select the entire business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92928054
ZeLonewolf (2020-10-23 05:26:18+00:00): Oops, didn't mean to make a changeset this big, sorry :(
tastrax (2020-10-28 11:28:33+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Tech Dec (2020-10-29 07:57:06+00:00): Thanks tastrax. I've made a note to make sure I get this right next time.
riiga (2020-10-23 20:20:24+00:00): How did you verify that this "fix" is correct?

I can tell you that there is no path leading directly onto the cul-de-sac, so please do not "fix" routing by inventing paths that do not exist in real life unless you have very good imagery or is familiar with the area in real life.

I've reverted this change.
czubi (2020-10-23 11:57:52+00:00): Hallo,
du hattest um request gebeten.
Grundsätzlich ist das löschen von falschen Informationen natürlich erlaubt, besser ist es aber sie zu verbessern. Beim Löschen geht die gesamte history verloren.
In diesem Fall hier hättest du einfach aus paved unpaved machen können oder auch gleich die deiner Meinung nach korrekte Oberfläche eingeben können. Diese kannst du hier finden https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface
LG
tobi_mo (2020-10-23 12:53:24+00:00): Hi,

alles klar. Ich werde es auf unpaved oder noch etwas genauer ändern.
Ist die Beschreibung der Oberfläche nicht eigentlich doppelt. Bei der Klassifizierung des Weges sagt man ja auch schon ein wenig wie der Weg beschaffen ist.

Grüße Tobias
czubi (2020-10-24 07:37:24+00:00): Tracktype= Oberflächenfestigkeit, surface =Oberfläche. Beide Werte korrelieren miteinander. Oberflächenfestigkeit Grade1 kann z.b. nicht Kies oder Waldboden sein. Und umgekehrt. Paved und unpaved sind wigentlich nur Oberbegriffe im key surface. Besser gleich die richtigen Werte verwenden. Bei Waldweg ist meist dirt oder ground o.ä. Orientiere dich am wiki.
Zh9567 (2020-10-23 06:19:41+00:00): *add features around Pulau Pasir Hitam, Perak, source from Esri Imagery, Maxar Imagery, and GeoNet Names Server
Arun Madhavan (2020-10-23 08:24:14+00:00): Thank you for the good work. it may be better to remove the private household information rather than correct them
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92932057
hebolz (2020-10-28 18:12:57+00:00): You are tagging highways as track, that are clearly unclasified. Others are changed from unclassified to track. This is in opposition to the african highway tagging scheme as well as year long custom. Is there any special reason for this?
UNGSC-DTLM-j_dlcf (2020-10-29 08:48:21+00:00): Hallo Hebolz,

Thank you very much for this remark. You are right, there are a lot of unclassified roads tagged as tracks. I am still working on that area, though. 

The road network in this area was a little bit messy. I focused first on the connectivity rather than on the road classification but I have already changed a bunch of them (tracks) to unclassified.

Let me know if there were some specific highways (id) you were referring to so I can, explicitly, have a look at them.

Thanks again,

Regards
hebolz (2020-10-29 13:44:03+00:00): If you continue to work in that area, it makes sense to do the classifications last. 
MapRoulette lets me jump here and there in DRC, so i just wondered about the tracks in an otherwise well mapped area.
   Greetings    Henning (hebolz)
DP24PH (2020-10-23 09:08:40+00:00): If you're wondering on why it got into unusually large changeset, then here are the following:
1. Overhaul of the whole #AH26 system (based from the initial changeset 92906761)
2. Partial completion of the following PITX/SRITT-based provincial buses to various destinations, including missing route_master:
a. SRITT - Davao City
b. PITX - Matnog [proposed]

It took almost a day (from the initial changeset as mentioned) to complete this changeset (albeit on the busy academic life), and don't forget to support the live session entitled, #Mapping101 Thursdays every Thursday. Link on DP24 OSM Page. Let's always remember to be safe, be well, stay sane, and you are loved.


DP24
literan (2020-10-24 14:25:15+00:00): highway=path + bicycle=designated
foot=designated это принятый набор тегов для совмещенной/разделенной пеше-велодорожки. Path это не тропа (в редакторе, видимо, неверный перевод - у нас в русском языке нет аналогичного термина), это неспецифизированный путь, предназначенный или для пешеходов или для велосипедистов. Так что верну.
AnonymousAlligator (2020-10-23 17:09:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding your business! OpenStreetMap doesn't allow advertising copy, so I removed the description tag. I also fixed a couple formatting issues, and I marked it as a pool supply store rather than a cleaning service--that fits better, in my experience.

Also wanted to let you know that your website is not loading for me--you may want to look into that.
bxl-forever (2020-10-23 22:27:55+00:00): Hello,
Over the past 10 days, you have routinely renamed DG DEVCO building into its full name (more precisely a text string containing both English and French names without a separator).
In the past we had lengthy discussions within the Belgian community to set up a standard for such buildings.  It is summarized in the wiki, and explained in one of the reverts. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/EU_institutions_and_bodies)
Would you please be so kind as to explain why you are so keen to name this building the way you do.  Is there anything we should be aware of?
Thanks in advance.
ququruzka (2020-10-23 13:44:07+00:00): я тібя піріправєрю в реальнасті )))

фонарі ці
AlexRiabtsev (2020-10-23 14:17:38+00:00): І що? На місці?
ququruzka (2020-11-06 09:56:45+00:00): tak
AlexRiabtsev (2020-11-08 18:47:11+00:00): супер! :)
skfd (2020-10-24 19:51:32+00:00): Привет! Так не стоит делать, деревья нужно отдельными формами рисовать а не заливкой поверх домов. там все зеленое конечно, но не на столько )
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92936410
Nakaner (2021-01-19 16:56:54+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2707849 (Bus 547 Bad Bergzabern → Kandel) die Rollen der Plattform-Mitglieder von "platform" auf "stop" geändert. Das ist so falsch. Haltestellen-Objekte, die nicht auf dem Fahrweg liegen, müssen mit der Rolle "platform" in der Routenrelationen enthalten sein, wenn die Relation der Schema-Version 2 folgt. Ich möchte dich bitten, diese bei dieser Routen und allen anderen betroffenen Routen zu korrigieren.

Mir ist außerdem aufgefallen, dass du in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92936441 bei dieser Relation schon viele Haltepositionen aus der Routenrelation entfernt hast, ohne diese in OSM zu löschen.

Zu den obigen Hinweisen möchte ich dich außerdem darum bitten, beim Hochladen von Änderungssätzen künftig einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar einzugeben, der die Änderung beschreibt/begründet. "Regionales Liniennetz" ist nichtssagend und provoziert Nachfragen wie diese. Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
yadathot (2020-10-23 08:12:28+00:00): Modified the geometry of roads and Added Service Roads, added gates, edited access tag as per Private Maxar imagery.
Mavpa_z_mapoiu (2021-01-28 11:18:00+00:00): https://kh.vgorode.ua/news/transport_y_ynfrastruktura/a1148759-kak-obekhat-na-khtz-do-1-maja-perekryli-ulitsu
Mavpa_z_mapoiu (2021-04-30 06:09:30+00:00): https://ul.waze.com/ul?ll=49.93581606%2C36.37137651&navigate=yes&zoom=17&utm_campaign=default&utm_source=waze_website&utm_medium=lm_share_location
NieWnen (2025-07-27 18:53:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830314957/history/1

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830314957/history/5

1 wersja była poprawnie otagowana. Zachęcam do zapoznania się https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w 

Minęło już trochę lat i może była taka okazja :)
lakedistrict (2020-10-23 11:23:18+00:00): Thanks

(closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1532274)
gurglypipe (2020-10-23 11:37:10+00:00): It’s been a long time coming!

Note that I haven’t updated any of the temporary parking or construction compounds, as I don’t know the status of those. This was just an update from the media reports, rather than a survey :)
Dimacn (2020-11-27 01:34:11+00:00): Вы удалили свойство builging у здания детского сада. Это ошибка, здание остаётся зданием. Я уже исправил.
Stalker61 (2020-10-23 17:09:51+00:00): С какой целью вы дублируете повсеместно полигон здания?
Stalker61 (2020-10-23 17:10:04+00:00): С какой целью вы дублируете повсеместно полигон здания?
Diacritic (2022-01-16 11:07:39+00:00): Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment
Arun Madhavan (2020-10-25 02:17:12+00:00): made some changes. pls see
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92939488
pio2_122 (2020-10-23 13:48:26+00:00): Jaki jest sens rysowania budynków w ciemno (bez aktualnego podkładu)?
Najważniejszy jest adres, który dodaje się jako punkt, a budynki powinno rysować się dopiero, gdy są dostępne aktualne podkłady...
Poprawa nieprawidłowo narysowanych budynków zajmuje więcej czasu (lub przynajmniej tyle samo), co dodanie ich od nowa wg aktualnych źródeł.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92939991
cyganka (2020-10-23 14:45:11+00:00): Szanuję taki pogląd, ale go nie podzielam.
sorcrosc (2020-11-06 22:38:41+00:00): Ho notato dei duplicati come questo, già presente poco lontano:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8039332787

Inoltre per favore non inserire nomi che non siano nomi propri. "Rispetto in montagna..." non credo sia un nome valido.

Grazie
eggie (2020-10-23 10:28:41+00:00): Beste robbre  Het gedeelte langs de volkstuinen vanaf Knalhutteweg 13 heet volgens de BGT de Engerinksweg. Misschien eens doorgeven bij Verbeter de kaart?
https://verbeterdekaart.kadaster.nl/#?geometry.x=160000&geometry.y=455000&zoomlevel=3

MVG,
eggie
SekeRob (2020-10-23 14:38:19+00:00): Actually would not know where I copy/pasted this from, but suppose the conditional tag was too much of the good. Guess the note I left asking to check can be closed with this.
mueschel (2020-10-23 14:50:50+00:00): Right... seems like the comment was the wrong one selected in the history.

A possible conditional hgv access tag would be:

hgv:conditional = no @ (19:00-07:00 AND weight > 15)

But I also just found that I made a mistake here, because the tag should be
maxweight:hgv:conditional  instead of maxweight:hgv.
Arun Madhavan (2020-10-25 02:12:18+00:00): What is GHD can you expnand the name ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92941575
Dimacn (2020-10-23 17:23:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Пожалуйста удалите текст из тега name
jodd (2020-10-30 18:40:50+00:00): Hallo ffm23,
du hast in deinem Änderungssatz für einige Gebäude die Firma angegeben, die das jeweilige Gebäude nutzt. Für die Firmennamen hast du das tag "name" der Gebäude verwendet, welches nach meinem Verständnis nur für den Namen des Gebäudes gedacht ist. Steht denn an den Gebäuden denn wirklich eine Art Schild, das dazu führt, dass das Gebäude tatsächlich nach der Firma benannt sein könnte? Teilweise hast du nämlich vorher vorhandene Gebäudenamen überschrieben (siehe z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358403598/history: Vorher "The Brick", jetzt "Deutsche Bahn AG").
Mein Vorschlag: Die Firma, wenn denn schon eingezogen, als eigenen node taggen und das name-Tag am Gebäude nur für die eigentlichen Namen der Gebäude nutzen, wenn denn vorhanden.
Wie siehst du die Sache?
VG jodd
Florek89 (2025-01-17 20:18:41+00:00): Błędna zmiana według mnie zmieniam na stan poprzedni
Branko Kokanovic (2020-10-29 13:18:12+00:00): Savet: zabranjeno je prepisivati sa a3. geosrbija, tako da se trudi da to ne radis
manojkmohan (2022-02-05 06:54:39+00:00): This node change have issues in this edit. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2359749117  
dont know why you add amenity =	restaurant in removing a place=village tag
ma-rt-in (2020-10-25 14:05:53+00:00): Hallo,
wie du bereits hier lesen kannst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2384705
habe ich deine Änderungen zurückgesetzt da du in dieser Note das geoportal als Quelle angeben hast.
Dieses Geoportal ist jedoch eine unzulässige Quelle.

vg
user_5359 (2020-12-01 04:59:17+00:00): Hello! You add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862981487 with only the key name: Could you please explain the meaning?
4004 (2020-10-24 22:06:31+00:00): здравствуйте, ст отмечается не как туристический домик, поправил
limes11 (2020-10-23 19:01:22+00:00): Hallo Hosp, 

Mit dem CS gibt es ein paar Probleme: 

- Was hat es mit den zwei Linien 862983570 und 862983569 auf sich ?

- Der Pfad 506702597
geht jetzt bis zur Brücke und reicht damit über die Treppe hinaus. Das geht so nicht. Entweder ist da eine Treppe oder nicht, aber den Pfad druebermalen ist keine Option.

- access=permissive auf der Bruecke ergibt in der Form keinen Sinn. Was moechtest du damit ausdrücken?

Beste Gruesse, Limes
limes11 (2020-10-24 19:13:19+00:00): Danke fuer die Reparatur der Bruecke, ich habe den Rest noch geflickt.
moreno96 (2020-10-29 20:04:27+00:00): با سلام.
معبر شهید باکری، هرچند از نظر شهرداری تهران بزرگراه محسوب میشه، اما همه خصوصیات یک بزرگراه رو نداره.
با وجود ورودی ها و خروجی های متعدد و عرض کم در بعضی از مقاطع، بهتره جزو معابر trunk تهران محسوب نشه.
این معبر بیشتر شبیه یک بلواره، تا بزرگراه
Supaplex (2020-10-24 03:08:31+00:00): Why do you remove max height relatuon
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92944911
L___I (2020-10-27 02:00:56+00:00): Hi Supaplex, 

thanks for double checking and recovering the data. Maybe deleting was actually the wrong action. Regarding your question, I was wondering what kind of real features you want to describe with these relations (https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#93010568) 

So could you tell what are these objects in the real world:
a) just a maxheight definition for a section of a way under a bridge (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight)
b) A height restrictor which prevents access of vehicles higher than a set limit. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dheight_restrictor) 
c) a device (mostly a camera) for measuring and documenting maxheight violation and send a monetary fine to the driver in charge afterwards (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement)
If c) the relation is in use, then there should be used also relation members with role definition like "from" / "device" / "to". (these seems are missing at the current state)

As said, I should better ask before convert to version (a) or deleting.

Regards
L___I
Supaplex (2020-10-29 02:18:05+00:00): I think there is no device, but physically impossible to pass when you exceed the maxheight, and a sign says maxheight xx meters. 
Most of maxheight warning does not need a device due to physically impossible to pass if you force to pass then your car will be stuck under the bridge.
ff5722 (2020-10-23 11:06:04+00:00): This is not a fake name
https://www.mountainproject.com/area/118125173/middle-finger
Arun Madhavan (2020-10-25 02:08:24+00:00): Can you expand the name ? NSS _ ? Nair Service Society ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92945231