piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jpennycook (2022-04-16 20:53:39+00:00): Hi!
You've set this bit of road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259266243) to oneway.  I don't think it is oneway outside of the car park itself - certainly when I've cycled on it, there haven't been any signs that I've seen (there are painted arrows in the car park itself, but not on this bit of road). I've changed it  back to two way to allow access to the cycleway (otherwise journey planners won't be able to use it in the southbound direction).

Jon
CrunchyLight (2022-04-16 21:06:20+00:00): Ah, I understand. I changed it mainly due to vehicles always using it in a One-Way Manner and on my walks it has always been the case. I didn't know this would cause a routing issue for routing.  My apologies and thank you for changing it back.
Rico557 (2022-04-18 06:10:31+00:00): Тут не было номеров квартир. Откуда данные?
Supaplex (2022-04-17 03:46:19+00:00): 醫院部分能用區域就用區域，而不用點，理想上是把醫院用地圈出來加上醫院的標籤
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119797944
LKAsahi (2022-04-19 16:11:01+00:00): 您好，謝謝您的指教！
當初用點是想說這樣比較接近醫院的入口，對於直接用預設osm-carto來看的人會比較友善（因為entrance=main遠比amenity=hospital來的不起眼），不過後來還是改回圈出來加amenity的做法了。
最近還在學習編輯OSM，前輩還有建議的話也請不吝指教！謝謝您！
PT-53 (2022-04-19 07:01:21+00:00): Hallo Helmut,
Du hast an diesem Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296506224/history
der Roßberg-Steige das Merkmal
- access=permissive
abgeändert auf
- access=yes;motor_vehicle@Mo-Sa

brouter-suspects zeigt jetzt dort einen Hinweis an:
http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=19/9.15019/48.41909&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json

Statt 
- access=yes;motor_vehicle@Mo-Sa
könnte
access=yes
motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ Su verwendet werden.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions

Grüße
Rico557 (2022-04-18 06:03:27+00:00): Ваши правки не соответствуют действительности.
Возврат на исходную - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119839448
HirschKauz (2022-04-22 19:55:15+00:00): Hi PatrickKnopf! Du hast "review requested" angekreuzt.... Hast Du Fragen zu Deinem CS?
Mich fällt gerade nur auf, dass das Becken keinen namen haben soll - das steht ja schon im basin=detention. Oder wo hast Du Zweifel?
Grüße, HirschKauz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119798557
julcnx (2022-04-17 14:56:21+00:00): Thank you for your contributions! 

In the future, please kindly consider splitting your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119798888
algastroller (2022-04-24 09:42:41+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the comment. I actually have no ideas about the changeset bboxes because I am not familiar with the technical end of maps.me. They seem to create problems (?). I will need to study the link you shared. If you can also tell me how I should make changes on maps.me, I can do it better. Thanks
julcnx (2022-04-24 13:25:42+00:00): Sorry I missed the maps.me part. I will check with them if anything can be done. happy travels!
Geim (2022-05-01 07:21:16+00:00): Hoi Teek, Op basis waarvan heb jij access=private toegevoegd aan de Normerdijk: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6570707/history
Staat daar echt een bordje verboden toegang?
eggie (2022-05-01 08:50:29+00:00): Hoi... Wellicht dat highway=service ook niet correct is. AnkErik had hier ook weer highway unclassified teruggetagd...ook omdat highway=service niet goed routeert voor fietsverkeer. Het is geen  weg zonder een speciale functie.
In mijn idee is het hier ook een doorgaande route voor fietsers. 
Volgens de wiki ......
highway=service 	Bijvoorbeeld een toegangsweg naar een parkeerplaats. De meeste van dit soort wegen zijn duidelijk geen normale weg, maar vallen niet onder 'unclassified', omdat ze een ander doel hebben.

Denk hier dus gewoon unclassified. 
In mijn idee heb ik hier ook gewoon gefietst in het verleden, maar dat is al weer even geleden. Het kan zomaar veranderd zijn? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-01 09:03:45+00:00): ... of highway=track met  tracktype=grade1  ??? Dat zou wellicht ook kunnen.
Geim (2022-05-01 10:03:05+00:00): Nee. Dan liever weer unclassified. Ben nu zelf op de fiets onderweg. Wil er vanavond wel even naar kijken. Maar jij mag het van mij ook wel doen.
eggie (2022-05-01 10:11:09+00:00): Pas het wel weer aan naar unclassified..maar fietsen gaat nog gebeuren vandaag.
Zal access private veranderen in motor_vehicle destination.
Wellicht weet Teek meer.. dan kan het nog altijd aangepast worden.
Zal zelf ook nog eens kijken daar.
Kom daar wel meer.
Groet
Eggie
eggie (2022-05-01 10:34:05+00:00): Teek.. 
Het buitendijks gebied heb ik omgezet van service-driveway.. (Dat is een oprit naar een losstaande woning)  naar highway=path..
Het is uiteraard gewoon het dijklichaam waar je rijdt. 
Best lastig om een goede tag te vinden voor zo'n breed stuk. 
access=private heb ik verwijderd. Je mag hier toch gewoon komen?
Het gaat er mij nu even om dat het weer routeert. Mochten er verbodsborden zijn gekomen laat het even weten svp. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-01 10:36:58+00:00): .. en er ligt hier nog een stuk land zonder enige tags. Neem aan dat je daarmee nog bezig bent?
Geim (2022-05-01 11:20:44+00:00): Niet dat ik weet. Was alleen met de wegen bezig.
eggie (2022-05-01 12:35:00+00:00): Dat is een opmerking voor Teek. Het wordt echt mooi hier.. maar die lege plekken triggeren ook andere mappers.
Palolo (2023-02-01 15:45:16+00:00): I changed this feature to place=village Elkere
jpennycook (2022-04-17 07:09:08+00:00): Hello again.

You're doing great work at updating QMC.  Have you seen this article on aligning the imagery?  The aerial imagery (e.g. Bing) isn't always aligned properly, so it's best to align the imagery to the Cadastral Parcels layer first.

https://osmuk.org/cadastral-parcels/

Jon
BCNorwich (2022-04-17 06:13:22+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the single node you uploaded to OSM as being untagged it has no meaning. Do you need help with anything?

Regards Bernard.
Mashin (2022-04-19 21:39:44+00:00): Thanks. But don't add railways that don't exist.
neuhausr (2022-04-18 14:11:26+00:00): You may already be aware of this, but in the US, postal city (addr:city) is tied to the zip code of the post office that serves the address, which may be in a different city. Thus even though these addresses are outside the Minneapolis city limits, some of their addr:city values may not be wrong. (For example, I looked up Medtronic HQ's address on their website and they list Minneapolis) USPS has a lookup tool for reference: https://tools.usps.com/zip-code-lookup.htm In the Cities by Zip Code tool, there's often one "recommended" city but others are also recognized, so it's sometimes more helpful in finding out which cities NOT to use. Certainly, not a huge deal--I'm guessing USPS systems mostly look at the zip code--but the more you know... :)
szdive (2022-04-16 23:03:05+00:00): Source was not correctly added by JOSM. Should be "local knowlege; Esri World Imagery"
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-04-23 02:14:07+00:00): Hi,

Perhaps the dog-park should be mapped as 'dog park'? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Ddog_park
022 (2022-04-23 02:47:28+00:00): The relation is not tagged this way, but each individual section has been. I will go and change it from site to multipolygon so I can tag it properly.
022 (2022-04-23 02:56:15+00:00): okay, see changeset #120074711 for the change. Changed it from site relation to a multipolygon, and transferred the tags into the relation itself including the dog park one . Should be good to go
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-04-23 08:48:33+00:00): Oh, allright, I glanced over the individual members...
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-04-23 08:54:18+00:00): To be honest, I think the tagging in this changeset was better. What if one of the three has different properties? (E.g. surface, one reserved for small dogs, ...) The previous tagging supported that.

Sorry for the inconvenience btw, should have thought about this earlier.
022 (2022-04-23 18:24:53+00:00): they are pretty much identical in the real world, but that's a good point so I will change it back. Thanks
022 (2022-04-23 20:46:24+00:00): alright, changeset #120104531 has it now changed to what it was before. I left the main tags (landuse=grass, leisure=dog_park, operator name) on the site relation along with the name, but also added those three tags to each way. should be correct now.
Strubbl (2022-04-21 19:36:10+00:00): Hallo, das Büro für Climate Partner existiert auch bereits in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9589835296
MxxCon (2022-04-18 06:21:00+00:00): Hello.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions please note that it is inappropriate to use description of a feature as its name. As such this name is going to be removed. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119801113
MxxCon (2022-04-18 06:31:44+00:00): Does this new restaurant has the same website address as the old one?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119801173
archpdx (2022-04-17 05:27:27+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for adding the road name to (https://osm.org/way/791633227)! However, please note that we don't abbreviate road names in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/abbreviation). In this case, the name should be expanded to 'Southeast Terrace Lane'.
Brian Cochran (2022-04-17 22:53:09+00:00): Fixed. Sorry about that
archpdx (2022-04-17 05:24:30+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like you added https://www.osm.org/way/1052348073 as a secondary road. Please note that in OSM, secondary roads are meant for 'highways linking large towns'. (See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway=secondary) and not for general access roads. I think that 'service road' would be a better classification for this. 

I'm not sure if Go Map lets you use other imagery sources, but I recommend using Esri imagery as it's newer than Bing in this area.
Brian Cochran (2022-04-17 22:49:06+00:00): Thanks, new to this.  Changed to service road.  Really I need to import .kmz or similar, but couldn’t figure that out in Go Map?  These are roads to property management, but meant as trails to the public.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-04-17 21:12:29+00:00): قمت بتغيير وحذف النقطة رقم 8990466605 والتي تمثل السليمانية:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8990466605/history
نرجوا منكم عدم حذفها أو تعديلها بدون سبب حقيقي كما أنك تقوم بتغيير مسميات الطرق وحذف المعالم المرسومة سابقاً بدون سبب نرجوا منكم التوقف عن هذه التصرفات
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-04-17 21:18:46+00:00): لقد قمت أكثر من مرة برسم مساحة سكنية غير واقعية ولا تتطابق مع صور الأقمار الصناعية، و قمت بتكرار ذلك في التغييرات التالية:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107940432
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102944825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99936220
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99665034
لذا نرجوا منك التوقف عن هذه التصرفات الغير صحيحة!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-04-17 21:19:45+00:00): كما قمت بحذف المساحة السكنية لقرية "السليمانية" أكثر من مرة من غير سبب واضح:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044547653/history
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-19 20:46:09+00:00): removida
julcnx (2022-04-17 14:56:12+00:00): Thank you for your contributions! 

In the future, please kindly consider splitting your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119802428
azakh-world (2022-04-17 22:33:31+00:00): Please stop change the network tag for subway routes one by one. Applications rely on this tag. If you are sure what you're doing, change the network for all the routes at once.

Best regards,
Alexey
dmfr (2024-09-22 13:15:36+00:00): Olá! Este aerogerador (node 9671323332) não me parece que exista. Estive a vasculhar imagens aéreas, e não aparece nada; e uma vez que adicionaste este aerogerador há 2 anos, seria de esperar que aparecesse em algumas imagens aéreas.
user_5359 (2022-05-02 19:57:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052359586. Did you mean highway=track or waterway=stream?
baum10 (2022-05-03 08:01:52+00:00): Hallo, user_5359
Es ist natürlich waterway=stream.
Ist mein Fehler gewesen.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Lg
VLD549 (2022-09-30 12:56:00+00:00): Hi, could you indicate where you got the name change from? Many sites seem to use Haardter Wee as spelling. Thank you.
https://lux.postcodebase.com/node/8009
Stereo (2022-09-30 17:08:42+00:00): Hi! The street sign  at the intersection says Haardterwee in one word. The cadastre, unhelpfully, has Haardterwee in its address database and Haardter Wee on its maps. Linguistically, I think two words is correct.

Would you be ok with "Haardter Wee" as an alt_name?
VLD548 (2022-10-07 12:32:53+00:00): Spelling of Haardter Wee is ok. Thanks.
Heinz_V (2022-09-10 06:28:04+00:00): What is the data source that the NH from Hospur to Krishnagiri is NH44 and not NH44;48?
Deepak Saravanan (2022-09-10 17:38:50+00:00): My Data source is simple government documents in the link below from Gazette and NHAI, check NH44, it's route mentioned Hosur, Dharmapuri, Salem in the state of TamilNadu. But for NH48 after Bengaluru it starts from Krishnagiri, Vellore from the state of TamilNadu skipping Hosur. And the document from NHAI has NH KM for each state split and when you check the KM between Chennai and Krishnagiri it will match the length of NH48 in the state of Tamilnadu. All my other changes as well is based on Govt sources and not from my imagination. Please dont waste time questioning each and everytime. Also please do understand basic logic a road can bear only one number not two numbers to identify it.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160816023220/http://dorth.gov.in/writereaddata/linkimages/9-6774713323.pdf

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/Details-of-National-Highways-as-on-31.03_1.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjbruLA4Yr6AhXfG7cAHWgCAqwQFnoECAcQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1YX73msoRm3_awL_y331bS
Heinz_V (2022-09-11 15:05:49+00:00): Your mentioned sources for the NH44 and the NH48 do not define exactly whether the stretch from Bangalore to Krishnagiri is named only NH44 or NH48 or NH44;48.

We have many difficult cases in India (not only in Tamil Nadu). So we need a data source which tells clearly the ref-tag of each NH-way in India. I do not know any. Google can not be used.

If the definition says that NH48 goes from Dehli to Chennai then it makes sense for me, that OSM tells the whole way from the start to the end.

So if you can give me an official data source which tells that each NH way has only one ref-tag, then I agree with you and we should find out the correct values.

Concerning the NH-relations: They should have as members all ways from the NH start to the NH end, even if some ways do not have the NH ref-tag (like NH48 above) and even if some ways are downgraded to primaries (has you have done in TN).
Deepak Saravanan (2022-09-12 06:46:00+00:00): I don't think there is any explicit proof that there should be only one number to a road. But here is an official document from NHAI where it clearly states that the section between Hosur and Krishnagiri is NH44 and not NH48
https://tis.nhai.gov.in/Admin/LocalNews/Krishnagiri.pdf
porfiriopaiz (2022-04-17 04:42:20+00:00): Hello ThunderH,

Thank you for contributing to OSM.

I just want to add some areas with opportunities for improvement on the naming of some of the elements you have added with this changeset:

Please use Capital Casing for the naming:

Instead of "Bar la Barca" please  use "Bar La Barca", and so on.

Happy mapping,
Porfirio
ThunderH (2022-04-17 13:50:09+00:00): Hello porfirio,
Thanks for the observations.
regards,
user_5359 (2022-04-18 09:54:35+00:00): Hello! Please notice a street, a road, a footway, a path has always the OSM key highway. I have corrected this.
ABDUL-AZIZ ABDALLA (2022-04-18 10:11:17+00:00): Ok I understand. Next time I will make i well
MxxCon (2022-04-18 06:52:25+00:00): What does "TAD STCLM" mean?
deuzeffe (2022-04-18 07:07:52+00:00): Also hello,

(english below)

Transport À la Demande de la Société de Transport en Commun de Limoges Métropole. Cf https://www.stcl.fr/

Une de mes relations de transport en commun, vide, a été effacée par un contributeur comme d'autres. Je l'ai restaurée (reverted) avec les autres. 

Si les relations doivent rester vides, il faut les effacer (une relation n'est pas une collection). Ou alors, il faut la remplir. Comme je n'en suis pas la créatrice, je les ai restaurées telles quelles.

Bonne journée.

Transport On Demand of the Société de Transport en Commun de Limoges Métropole. See https://www.stcl.fr/

One of my relations of public transport, empty, was erased by a contributor like others. I have restored it (reverted) with the others. 

If relations are to remain empty, they must be deleted (a relation is not a collection). Or it must be filled. As I am not the creator, I have restored them as they are.

Have a nice day.
user_8101879 (2022-04-20 22:36:12+00:00): Si vous m'aviez demandé j'aurai rétabli uniquement votre relation erronée au lieu de rétablir toutes les relations vides, polluer la base de données n'est pas une attitude adaptée à vos problèmes.
4004 (2022-04-17 23:57:04+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
ровнять углы можно кнопкой Q или в меню по правой кнопке мыши
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-20 22:58:48+00:00): Not sure what happened but it appears https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052377271 glitched and is a straight line.
Heinz_V (2022-04-21 08:02:40+00:00): I made corrections. Hitting "Q" in JOSM!!
Vinber (2022-04-17 15:09:38+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue !

il n'est pas nécessaire de mettre le code postal et la ville.

n'hésitez pas à en ajouter quelques autres sur le chemin, au niveau du portail par exemple.

Bonne carto
yves klein (2022-09-05 23:37:33+00:00): Hallo Koellefornia, 
du hast den befestigten Fahrweg unterbrochen und in die beiden Sackgassen 29277653 und 
794696894 verwandelt. Dein Kommentar behauptet, beide Wegstücke seien zugewachsen. Dem widersprechen alle verfügbaren Luftbilder sowie alle Erfahrung, dass die Natur so einen breiten Weg nicht plötzlich "zuwächst". Außerdem besteht dort immer noch die Relation für den durchgehenden "Weyer Rundweg 8", und dieser Weg wird weiterhin von der Stadt Mechernich beworben. Bitte repariere das Loch.

Was vielleicht stimmt, aber aus Luftbildern nicht zu beurteilen ist, wäre eine materielle Barriere zum Seitenweg 41189825. Diese sollte dann als obstacle oder barrier eingetragen werden, jedoch ebenfalls nicht als Wegelücke. Falls ein Abschnitt des versperrten Wegs außerdem zugewachsen sein sollte, würde dieses Stück mit dem Präfix "disused:" (falls irreversibel, mit "abandoned:") markiert.

Ich werde die Stelle bei einer kommenden Eifelwanderung auch selber in Augenschein nehmen, aber das kann noch einige Zeit dauern.
Alles Gute, Yves
yves klein (2022-09-05 23:57:21+00:00): P.S. Falls du die Technik des *Revertierens* der gerissenen Lücken nicht beherrschst (ich tue das auch nicht), kann man einen routinierten User darum bitten, z.B. Nakaner.
highflyer74 (2022-09-06 04:46:56+00:00): @yves klein: ist zurückgesetzt. Hier müsste dann die tatsächliche Lage geklärt werden. Gruß aus dem Norden!
yves klein (2022-09-06 06:55:43+00:00): @highflyer74: danke für spontanen Sanitätsdienst! Auf einen Ausflug dorthin und eine Klärung der Lage freue ich mich schon. Gruß us Kölle!
Koellefornia (2022-09-06 07:05:12+00:00): Mein Kommentar "behauptet". Schau es dir besser mal an!
yves klein (2022-09-09 18:03:04+00:00): Hab ich jetzt. Befund: 
1. Berechtigt ist, die 70 m Querung der Wiese zu löschen. Sie ist völlig unkenntlich und wegen Weidezaun nicht re-aktivierbar. (Koellefornia, DAS hattest du gesehen).
2. Von Osten kommende Wanderer haben ersatzweise den alten Waldweg nach Süden re-aktiviert, jetzt 1093202207. Zu Fuß ok, zum Radfahren zu viele Ranken = discouraged
3. Der östliche Teil des revertierten Pfads 194146562 ist gut erkennbar und deutlich begangen. Bleibt.
4. Der revertierte Feldweg 44285441 ist gut erhalten und durch flankierende Weidezäune von Vieh freigehalten. Bleibt.
5. Die drei von mir bezweifelten Unterbrechungen in den befahrbaren Wegen gibt es echt nicht. Sie waren reine Bearbeitungsschäden (Punkt abtrennen unter Relation war wohl misslungen)
6. Die gelöschte Wiesenquerung ist noch auf Wandertafeln an Parkplätzen erhalten. Sollte überklebt werden. Zwar kein Job für osm, wär aber trotzdem nützlich.
Jruuß us Kölle, Yves
demon_box (2022-04-27 17:21:32+00:00): ciao Ennio, è proprio "Bai"? oppure anke se in forma dialettale si scrive "Bait" e si pronuncia "Bai"?
grazie
GISH_ElAseel (2022-04-18 09:17:15+00:00): Hello Stefan0328;
 I noticed that you updated part of "Shiekh Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah Road" and convert it from under construction to operational with "oneway tag" and connected it with "construction highway " that led to made some ways floating and not connected with any ways,
Could you verify the source you edit and fix this issue please ?
link for ways you edit and the node connected with under construction ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052383334/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052383333/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1278716299/history
Regards
GISH_ElAseel
Stefan0328 (2022-04-18 09:51:58+00:00): Hello GISH_ElAseel, thanks for noticing, I didn't fully complete my edit yesterday, but now it's done.
I changed the disconnected floating highway segments to "construction" as well, so all should be well for now. If you see any other issues, please let me know.
I drove the new operational road 2 days ago.
GISH_ElAseel (2022-04-18 11:42:20+00:00): Hello Stefan0328;
Thank you for your edit and make OpenStreetMap much better, For sure if I see any issue I will let you know.
Regards
GISH_ElAseel
rednail (2025-03-14 21:43:20+00:00): Hallo, ich wollte mal fragen wo man die Kurzform von Städten, die "am Main" im Namen haben taggt. Also Kahl statt Kahl am Main. Sollte man das an die place node oder die boundary relation machen? Macht es in Zeiten von fuzzy search überhaupt Sinn das zu taggen (nur für Nominatim anscheinend)?
Ich hab mal eine rudimentäre Overpass-Abfrage (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/20nq) gemacht, die zeigt, dass es da anscheinend keine Regeln gibt. Frankfurt am Main hat alles doppelt, die Städte die du gemappt hast, haben alles an der boundary. 
Dann besteht noch die Frage welchen key man nimmt. Die Kurzform gibt es als short_name, loc_name, reg_name, alt_name usw. Manchmal ist auch "am Main" als name:suffix getaggt.
surveyor54 (2025-03-16 08:19:19+00:00): Hi,
wenn ich ehrlich bin, hab ich mir da noch keine großen Gedanken gemacht, da es oft auch schon vorgegeben war. 
Das Tagging name:suffix fände eine gute Idee, an node und Relation.

Du könntest aber auch ein thread in Forum aufmachen und sich die Meinung der Kollegen einmal anschauen.

Gruß
surveyor54
bxl-forever (2022-05-08 15:42:04+00:00): Hello, Antoine,

Updating public transport in Wallonia is a good idea and I am sure you are knowledgeable about where bus routes go.

You might be interested to know that the wiki includes a list of bus routes in Belgium, with the corresponding ID number of the route relations.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Public_Transport#Brabant_wallon

You might want to have a look because most links are broken now and the list would require some update to include the route relations you created when erasing the existing ones.

Looking forward to your reply.
Thanks.
demon_box (2022-05-03 14:30:28+00:00): attenzione Ennio, il significato dei tags bisogna conoscerlo prima di utilizzarlo, basta cercare su wikipedia... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Dno 
i tags bicycle=no e horse=no significano ke il passaggio sul quel sentiero è VIETATO dal punto di vista legale e NON ke si tratta di un sentiero troppo "brutto" per farlo in bici o a cavallo e quindi è consigliato percorrerlo soltanto a piedi)...