piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
lrysiukevich_lyft (2022-07-01 14:41:37+00:00): Hi, Mundilfari! My name is Lizaveta, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this.

Our lanes editing flow was based on article “Lanes” in OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#:~:text=is%20an%20intersection.-,Street,-Here%2C%20a%20residential). According to it only a fully formed turn lane can be included into the lane count (i.e. a turn lane transition area marked with dashes where the lane begins to form do not include into the lane count since it is not fully formed).

But after researching OSM Wiki we found the following information in another article: “If the number of lanes changes it is necessary to split the OSM way. This should be done as soon as a new lane has started (regardless of width)...” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes#:~:text=for%20further%20details.-,If%20the%20number,-of%20lanes%20changes). It confirms correctness of the previous edits made by ridixcr (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/435720702). 

In our opinion, these 2 articles contradict each other and become a source of confusion. We assume that both methods can be correct and apologize for any inconvenience caused by these changes. And me and my team want to assure you that we will no more correct one approach of tagging such lanes into another. I’ve also rolled back my edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123089274.

If you know any other details that can clarify the current state of this area, we'll be happy to work on this further. Thank you so much for your contribution! 

Best regards,
Lizaveta
Mundilfari (2022-07-04 03:52:26+00:00): Hi Lizaveta,

Thanks so much for getting back to me on this. 
You're bringing up an interesting point. I was only aware of the key:lanes wiki page and hadn't realized there's conflicting information on the other one.
I agree with your conclusion that the two contradict, and that given the information that's out there, one could make an argument for either being right (or wrong).

Personally, I would argue that splitting the way as soon as the turn lane begins (the approach described on the key:lanes wiki page) feels more appropriate for practicality reasons:
If a router wants to produce accurate instructions (think "use the left lane to turn into xyz road at the next traffic light"), it would have to know where that turn lane begins.
At least here in Illinois, the rules of the road do not explicitly forbid crossing solid white lines, but it is discouraged*. I believe it is illegal to cross solid white lines in at least some other states (in which case splitting at the point of the turn lane reaching full width would be the precise spot when moving to that lane becomes illegal...).
For a router  to provide accurate instructions, it would therefore have to "guess" where the turn lanes starts.
The problem with that is that turn lane length can vary significantly (even turn lanes at the same intersection can have significantly different lengths), so the estimate is almost always gonna be wrong. 

That being said, given the absence of consistent rules in the wiki, your opinion here is as good as mine (or anybody else's).
Is there a particular reason why you'd prefer splitting the way once the turn lane reaches full width? I'm not seing a benefit myself (rather the opposite, see above), but I'm curious to hear your perspective.

Thank you and have a great day,


* IL rules of the road, page 79 (page number) / 87 (pdf page): "Solid white lines separate lanes of traffic moving in the same direction Crossing a solid white line requires special care and is discouraged."
https://www.ilsos.gov/publications/pdf_publications/dsd_a112.pdf
technician_lyft (2022-07-05 13:19:08+00:00): Hi Mundilfari, I’m Rostom, the team lead on the OSM team at Lyft.

Thank you for the detailed clarification.
Regarding your question, there is no technical reason why we decided to follow this particular way of mapping. Information from the “Lanes” wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#:~:text=is%20an%20intersection.-,Street,-Here%2C%20a%20residential) was taken as the basis for our policy, and we have always tried to adhere to this workflow. We rely exactly on the “Lanes” wiki page because lanes count tag is firstly added to the road segment, and then, depending on the number of lanes, the rest of the necessary :lanes tags are added.
Our drivers get instructions in advance, no matter at which place the road was split. In my opinion both variants are possible and from our side won’t affect navigation so far.
We will look deeper into different states traffic rules specifications regarding lane markings and figure out if any specific policies per state would be needed.
In further edits we won’t modify lanes count and “:lanes” tags  if they were mapped according to another approach.

Have a nice day,
Rostom
eggie (2022-07-05 13:01:01+00:00): Dag Jesco.. Alle adressen zijn directe import vanuit de BAG Beter niets aan veranderen.
Het adres nr 32 zal ik herstellen. 

MVG
eggie
Jakka (2023-08-03 07:18:08+00:00): de officiële krt toont pad via noordelijke splitsing ?
https://www.geopunt.be/shared/ba375026-5a12-4706-b769-aa7b8de3e439
PT-53 (2022-07-01 07:22:55+00:00): Hallo hirschlp,
Du hast an diesen Gebäuden
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758397400/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758397401/history
die Adressen ergänzt und dazu
- addr:street=Datthausen
verwendet.
Da es in Datthausen keinen Straßennamen "Datthausen" gibt, verwenden wir in OSM in diesem Fall anstelle von addr:street das Adress-Merkmal addr:place.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:place?uselang=de

Da die Haus-Nr. 25 bisher an diesem Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283103806/history
eingetragen und somit in OSM doppelt vorhanden war (was nicht sein sollte) , habe ich die Adresse an diesem Gebäude gelöscht.
Außerdem habe ich noch diese Zufahrt eingezeichnet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075017576/history

Grüße vom Fuße des Bussen
Enock4seth (2022-06-30 14:05:21+00:00): Hello Joseph 

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Your first changeset is great. Knowing that I reused some nodes to create this building, I am not sure how I came up with the name though. 

Thank you for fixing and looking forward to seeing more fixes in and around Tarkwa.

Happy Mapping! Oh, you might want to add "h" at the end of "Churc".

Best,
Enock
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:05:29+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14309558 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

Best regards
mueschel (2022-07-01 09:50:41+00:00): Hi,
could you check these edits? It's "operator", not "operador".
Emilio Gomez (2022-07-01 10:01:41+00:00): Upss!! Thanks for the notification. I have just corrected it in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123078967
Strubbl (2022-06-30 11:30:27+00:00): Hi FraBB, danke für deine Beiträge. Du kannst Objekte durch den Editor rechtwinklig machen lassen, indem du die Objekte markierst und die Taste Q drückst.

Viele Grüße
Sven
FraBB (2022-06-30 11:42:36+00:00): Moin Sven,
danke für die Info, kann ich sicherlich demnächst anwenden ;)
Gruß
Frank
ftcat (2022-06-30 15:32:30+00:00): Hi Mar Mar,

This is an example where what appears as scrub is not actually scrub. The boundary between the scrub and woodland is actually the overlap of 2 different sets of imagery taken at different times of the year and a different clarity. The imagery to the right is taken later in the the dry season, hence black burnt dambos and to the left is soon after the end of the rains so trees are still green and dambos look wetter and so are not burnt
charl3s (2022-06-30 11:14:44+00:00): A co z refem się stało? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570104941/history
szalona_entropia (2022-06-30 12:08:26+00:00): DK92 się kończy na skrzyżowaniu z DK17. Dalej w stronę Warszawy już nie ma drogi krajowej
charl3s (2022-06-30 12:43:43+00:00): a, ok
user_12500175 (2022-07-20 12:08:30+00:00): Hallo, 
klasse dass du bei OSM mitmachst!
Eine Frage: Du hast das Cafe eingetragen, allerdings ist da immer noch Leerstand ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:07:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
RicoElectrico (2022-06-30 13:12:43+00:00): Cześć, poprawiłem Twoją edycję. Zostawiłem nowododaną kawiarnię i wycofałem resztę, bo przesunąłeś drogę na budynek. ( podgląd zmian: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123040756&zoom=16&lat=52.2178&lon=21.0272 )

Polecam przejście samouczka, który pokazuje jak poruszać się po edytorze: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Samouczek_edytora_iD
真空中的球形猫 (2022-07-01 08:32:06+00:00): 如果发现前一位编辑者是BJMTR/Maps Man/Metroedit啥啥的

直接举报即可
SNH48-林忆宁 (2022-07-01 13:03:04+00:00): ok，举办喵
SekeRob (2022-07-04 16:51:52+00:00): Hi,

Why did you tag the park outline as being entirely wood? Half of it is by the looks of it grassland, there's bare ground/rock zones and more so it's rather arbitrary to designate the whole park as wood. Better would be to outline the individual main zones inside the park and tag them for what they are and remove the natural=wood tag from the park.

Why I came here: OSM Inspector flags the long straight border on the right side as being used twice for the same area.

Just so you know.

ciao
Arber V (2022-07-05 06:02:56+00:00): Hi . 
The park its All wood . If u look that ar areas that are damaged by fire and ar not rock or land . In this park ther are no grasslands . And as for the borders and lines m thay are not done by me .. but from the authoritys . 

Thnx for the comment.
SekeRob (2022-07-05 06:53:38+00:00): Still wrong I'm afraid as there's wood area mapped on top of wood area and grass area and strangely so the previously mapped wood outlines follow the line where I see long standing grass and that's old and new imagery. Anyway rendering is broken, OSM Inspector flags it's broken, trees growing middle of the ponds.
OSMDoudou (2022-07-02 07:29:18+00:00): Bonjour, Merci pour cette contribution. Je vois une erreur parce que l’adresse indiquée sur le point est Rue de la Chaussée mais le point est situé à la Rue de la Clef. Voudriez-vous corriger ? Merci.
archie (2022-07-06 13:18:11+00:00): What's is all this new landuse=residential inside an area 
 tagged as landuse=residential about? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jVn Seems rather useless to me. What's the point?
Meersbrook (2022-07-06 13:25:28+00:00): They're something you don't like mapping individually.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-07-08 01:03:38+00:00): Individual plots is taking it too far.
And landuse should not be nested.
kaciorx (2022-08-18 18:59:25+00:00): Ten opel to chyba tam nie ma swojego punktu. Ostatnio rowerem tam przejeżdżałem to widziałem go w 303A. Z kolei na ich stronie jest wpisane 303, ale faktycznie jest to budynek od frontu
frosm (2022-07-04 14:50:43+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue !
merci pour votre contribution
il y a cependant un petit soucis avec le no 253 que vous avez renseigné sous forme de 253 bandes de circulations ce qui fait un peu beaucoup :)
n'hésitez pas à mettre cela vers la porte d'entrée ou sur le batiment
jensjjj (2022-07-06 11:24:24+00:00): Die opening_hours müssten um "24/7 || "Nur mit Tanteenso-Kundenkarte""
erweitert werden. 24/7 ist hier in meinen Augen wichtig!
Gruß
Jens
Fandarel (2022-07-06 12:37:42+00:00): Moin Jens,
die opening_hours sind allerdings kein Freitext, eine Evaluierung könntest du auf der Seite https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?lng=de vornehmen. Und wie die Syntax verwendet wird, ist auf der Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours beschrieben. Die von dir angedachte Angabe ist so nicht widerspruchsfrei. Der Verweis auf die Enso-Card ist dabei auch nicht hilfreich. Wer diese Information benötigt, findet sie über die Kontakt-URL.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:34:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:20:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
joost schouppe (2024-05-09 07:58:26+00:00): Zeker dat dit nog bestaat? De website is weg, en de Facebook pagina is al twee jaar niet meer bijgewerkt. Ik snap het concept ook niet zo goed: op het terrein van het Boerenerf staat er af en toe nog een extra food truck?
Mizuna (2024-05-12 17:54:39+00:00): Meer dan 2jaar geleden dat ik er nog gepasseerd ben. Ik heb het op disused gezet.
Ze verkopen blijkbaar nog ijs in Vollezele en via foodtruck...
facebook.com/patchamamaroomijs/
watmildon (2024-09-19 03:06:57+00:00): Hello! I've been adding ballot drop boxes in Arapahoe county and was greatly helped by the one you added here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9857971901/history#map=19/39.595986/-104.735573) I have adjusted the tagging slightly but wanted to let you know I bumped into it!

Happy mapping!

Matt
jjyach (2024-09-19 03:18:49+00:00): You are greatly welcome!  I used it years ago and remember it not being straightforward to find especially when dark out.
watmildon (2024-09-19 03:39:39+00:00): Yes! This was my experience here in WA so I'm kinda on a mission. If there's a few I can't track down in the area I may ping you to see if you want to do some surveying. ;-) 

Currently, finding the one listed as "Arapahoe County Fairgrounds" is driving me bonkers.
watmildon (2024-09-19 03:59:20+00:00): Addresses for the 4 remaining and elusive Arapahoe County drop boxes: 
25690 E. Quincy Ave. Aurora, CO 80016
18150 E. Vassar Pl. Aurora, CO 80013
6060 S. Quebec St. Greenwood Village, CO 80111
4810 E. County Line Rd. Littleton, CO 80126
jjyach (2024-09-19 11:10:29+00:00): Here you go, I got the fairground one.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156814456

I will try and see if I can get the remaining ones
jjyach (2024-09-19 11:19:12+00:00): Okay I got the others on Vassar/Quebec, but according to   https://www.arapahoevotes.gov/voter-service-polling-centers there is no ballot box there on County Line Road, though that technically is in Douglas County
watmildon (2024-09-19 16:22:58+00:00): It's great how obvious that fairground one is once you've place the node on it! Great work.

I got my list from this page https://www.arapahoevotes.gov/ballot-drop-locations which does have the County Line one listed.
watmildon (2024-09-20 02:42:13+00:00): Found it!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12187343861/history
jjyach (2024-09-20 16:14:07+00:00): Nicely done!
eggie (2022-07-05 13:02:03+00:00): Dag Jesco.. Lijkt me oke zo.
Gr eggie
gurglypipe (2022-06-30 14:04:34+00:00): Hi, can you please not retag landuse=farmland, farmland=pasture as landuse=meadow without adding further qualifiers about the kind of meadow (as the farmland=pasture tag was used)?

Very, very few fields in northern England are actual meadows, so I believe use of landuse=meadow is misleading. Almost all of them, used for sheep and cattle grazing, are pasture.

Meadows have longer grass and wildflowers and are cut for hay rather than being close-cropped grazed for most or all of the year.
conifermapper (2022-06-30 17:34:40+00:00): Ok will add meadow=pasture tags
gurglypipe (2022-06-30 17:42:50+00:00): Thanks. I’d actually go with landuse=farmland farmland=pasture rather than landuse=meadow meadow=pasture, since the former is the predominant tagging in the north west at the moment, and is being used by several active mappers. At some point your mapping is going to reach theirs, and there’s going to be a discontinuity.

Either tagging would be arguably correct, though, since there’s some wiggle room about it on the wiki. :)
conifermapper (2022-06-30 17:46:46+00:00): Ok, no problem , wont retag any more existing landuse=farmland farmland=pasture
gurglypipe (2022-06-30 17:48:59+00:00): ta :)
user_2066394 (2022-06-30 14:03:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403681868
Der Weg verläuft nicht unterirdisch (layer=-1), sondern  erhält unter dem Dach zugeschnitten ein covered=yes , um den Fehlerhinweis zu lösen.
Knorkar (2022-07-01 06:29:55+00:00): Korrekt. Danke, hab ich wieder was gelernt.
user_2066394 (2022-07-01 23:29:48+00:00): Link hatte ich noch vergessen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfuel
Leo Slager (2022-06-30 22:04:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
JerdeWit (2022-07-01 07:10:54+00:00): Gelezen idd en je een vraag gesteld.
Moet ik nog wat aan deze wijzigingen doen?
Leo Slager (2022-07-01 20:57:11+00:00): Dag JerdeWit,

Ter hoogte van Baak van Wemeldinge nr 17 heb je het water over het water heen gelegd.
Voor twee wegen in de changeset staat oneway=no.
Meestal is dat dan niet van toepassing voor fietsers, in dat geval toevoegen
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:mofa=no
en als het ook niet geldt voor bromfietsers dan toevoegen
oneway:moped=no
Hier kun je die changeset nog eens bekijken:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123042791&zoom=16&lat=52.20499&lon=5.41363&layers=B0TTTFT
haukep (2022-06-30 14:30:09+00:00): Hi! Du hast hier beim Asia Quick 2 "man_made=surveillance" gesetzt. Asia Quick 2 ist jedoch ein Imbiss, keine Überwachungskamera.

Meinstest du vielleicht https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surveillance?
bielebog (2022-07-18 21:24:58+00:00): Oha, danke für den Hinweis. Das hab ich bestimmt woanders auch falsch gemacht. Ist hier nun mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123780434 geändert, ich behalt's im Hinterkopf.
user_10901495 (2022-09-08 15:23:14+00:00): Luzern is definetely a city, as Lugano.
Not up to discussion, they have the infrastructure, population, importance of cities, and are regarded as such by literally everyone. I don't know on what basis someone could describe them as towns. Just because they are officially described as cities doesn't mean that they are NOT cities.
Sankt Gallen, while certainly less important, is described as such on the Wikipedia page: "Today, it is a large urban agglomeration (with around 167,000 inhabitants in 2019) and REPRESENTS THE CENTER OF EASTERN SWITZERLAND"

Biel, on the other hand, can be safely described as a town, although  an important one.
Marc Mongenet (2022-09-09 12:56:11+00:00): Well, Luzern and Lugano do not have a population of 100000+. They do not have international airports.
On the other hand, the population of their agglomeration is 100000+, they have universities (albeit very small), all trains stop in their station.
But are they important enough to be on distant street signs? We can find street signs for Luzern near Zurich and Basel. But not for Lugano, while there is a sign for Chiasso near Basel! I am not conviced for Lugano.
BCNorwich (2022-06-30 16:20:06+00:00): Hi, I've removed the no exit tag from the High Street as it would disrupt the traffic flow.

Regards Bernard.
Dodko (2022-06-30 13:41:51+00:00): Ak je adresa súčasťou budovy tak sa nedáva duplicitne aj do bodu POI.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/823562422
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/845987915
BelKed (2022-06-30 13:53:46+00:00): Ďakujem za upozornenie, už som to opravil :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123046627
Langlaeufer (2022-06-30 14:02:01+00:00): I see at the orthophoto to open gates and no fence. I changed it in this way. You may have a look.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123044434
Anil Basnet (2022-10-27 10:11:12+00:00): Wrong tagging of roads, roads that leads to residential area are residential roads not secondary link. 
Please read these wikis to learn about highway tagging: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nepal/Roads
user_5589 (2023-07-11 18:17:20+00:00): Well that's funny.

The Coventry Building Society has been there every day since that incorrect change as I've walked past it. It was there when I walked past it this morning.

Reverse that edit as it's utterly incorrect.
user_5589 (2023-07-17 20:28:27+00:00): I told you to reverse this incorrect edit. You have logged on since I posted that comment so you know about this comment. Since you have ignored my instruction I am now going to reverse this edit myself.
fitzsimons (2023-07-20 12:02:41+00:00): Thanks, I haven't been back in town to check what I saw.
gurglypipe (2022-06-30 13:59:43+00:00): Hi, thanks for taking an interest in this area of the map. I added the residential area for the static caravan site on the basis of your comments in your previous edit. Was that not correct? I kept the area separate from the Caravan Club site.

Static caravan parks are meant to be tagged as landuse=residential residential=trailer_park.

Perhaps mapping the hedge/fence between them would make it clearer that they are separate?

Note also that it can take a few hours for the rendered map to update after you’ve made an edit, which may be confusing matters slightly.