piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
muralito (2018-12-15 02:11:42+00:00): Por las dudas te aclaro que no, en tus cambios no estas teniendo en cuenta la convencion que te planteo AgusQui, o si la conoces como planteas no la estas respetando.

Como dije antes, no esta en duda tu conocimiento de la vialidad de la zona, lo que se esta discutiendo es que los criterios que estas aplicando no están en lo convenido, creo que ni en este ni en muchos de los cambios que has hecho por toda Argentina.
AgusQui (2018-12-15 02:56:10+00:00): La convencion dice que las avenidas urbanas troncales, como Yrigoyen, van como primary, se pueden clasificar como trunk si tienen el trafico local segregado con colectoras que no es el caso.
thatoneiowan (2018-11-14 19:17:08+00:00): looks like the name of the street was changed instead of having added a new building outline or a node?
freebeer (2018-11-15 00:51:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64508744 where the changeset comment is: restore a road to not be spamvertising
thatoneiowan (2018-11-15 18:49:26+00:00): aha thanks mate, will try to remember to head in this area to look for the business itself sometime in the near future
rab (2018-11-15 17:15:48+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499642668
this is a powerline
Kiekin (2018-11-14 20:07:48+00:00): Das war kein Vandalismus, mußte zwischenspeichern. Schade um die Arbeit.
roschitom (2018-11-14 20:53:01+00:00): Keine Sorge, die verloren gegangenen Daten werden diese Nacht wieder  eingetragen. 
Auch ist das Anwenden von Einoutermultipolygonen gerade im Gespräch
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64439

Deiner Sockenpuppe derclaudius werde ich auch noch mal schreiben.

Im Prinzip hast du dich Kiekin , meinen Mappingstil sehr angenähert und vertrittst ihn an Hand der Änderungssatzkomentare sehr konsequent.
Der größte Unterschied ist, ich zähle Gehwege noch zur Straße, was der OSM Way auch macht. Du redest etwas von Belag herrum, sowas kann man mal machen wen sich das Prinzip des a:h mehr durchgesetzt hat. Landuse:residental sind die Gehwege nicht.

Ich werde mal noch ein wenig Zeit in die Hand nehmen um einige Änderungen von dir gutgemeint kommentieren, wo du Fehler gemacht hast.

Gruß ... roschitom
Geogast (2018-11-14 19:10:26+00:00): source=Esri (não Bing)
Mazda05 (2019-01-18 23:39:53+00:00): на объектах не типа "здание" не требуется указывать адрес
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64498421
Владимир К (2018-11-14 21:12:36+00:00): 👍
philippec (2019-08-09 20:22:16+00:00): Vreemd dat die indoor is met een gemeente als operator in een BenB.
dmlu (2018-11-16 10:33:57+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de modifier la toilette que vous avez ajouté. J’ai remarqué que vous n’avez pas utilisé des « tags » qui sont utilisés dans OSM (comme p.ex. amenity=toilets). 
Une ressource utile est https://learnosm.org/fr/beginner/id-editor/#ajouter-des-points , qui contient une courte introduction.
Merci pour la contribution 😊
Kirsten Johnson (2018-11-14 19:41:11+00:00): #Critigen
eggie (2018-11-14 21:24:57+00:00): Op zich is de tagging goed, maar... De man_made =bridge moet over de oevers liggen en contact maken met de highway op de punten waar daar de brug begint.
Nu ligt de brug midden in het water en moet je naar de kant springen.
eggie (2018-11-14 21:25:54+00:00): Met contact bedoel ik dat je twee verbindingsnodes hebt met de highway.. en precies op het punt waar de brug dus eindigt op die highway.
eggie (2018-11-14 22:07:56+00:00): Als voorbeeld heb ik de brug goedgelegd.
eggie (2018-11-14 22:24:20+00:00): Doe je zelf de Leveroyse brug?
eggie (2018-11-15 07:13:03+00:00): Kijk even hoe ik de die andere brug heb aangepast.
eggie (2018-11-15 11:08:05+00:00): Ik heb het water even aangepast.Was veel te breed hier. . Dat maakt het wat makkelijker. De weg nog verbinden met de korte zijden van de man_made bridge.
eggie (2018-11-15 10:35:11+00:00): Niet PostNL als operator?
Leon Tunissen (2018-11-15 19:24:50+00:00): Klopt....
R0bst3r (2018-11-16 08:25:27+00:00): Hallo tbkrtz,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64499942
eggie (2018-11-15 10:31:14+00:00): Ik zal het oorlogsmonument even veranderen in historic=memorial.. 
Een "monument" bij ons betekent in het Engels  iets heel anders. Bv de TaiMahal is een monument. 
Dat zijn de bekende adders. 
Zo zie je geld-banken om op te zitten en arts_centres voor huisarts.
Leon Tunissen (2018-11-15 19:24:24+00:00): Aaaaahhhhhh
Parzelle13 (2018-11-14 21:21:21+00:00): Darf man fragen, was du hier eintragen möchtest?
ma-rt-in (2018-11-22 16:36:04+00:00): Hallo,
wie ich sehe hast du einen Haufen an Bäumen erstellt. eigentlich ist der key natural=key jedoch nur für außergewöhnliche bäume gedacht und nicht stur eine Ansammlung wie ein Wald.
Bitte drauf achten.
vg
eggie (2018-11-14 21:00:00+00:00): Als een bus! :)
eggie (2018-11-14 21:19:41+00:00): De wegen op een parkeerplaats tag je met de extratag 
highway=service
service=parking_aisle
Ik heb net wat aangepast. dat heb ik met potlatch2 gedaan. dan druk ik alleen maar op de R toets en wordt alles gekopieerd van de eerste parking_aisle
Royke71 (2018-11-15 20:02:44+00:00): Ik heb nu ook wat uitgeprobeerd met potlatch2. Het ziet er in elk geval qua eenrichtingswegen op die parkeerplaats nu in elk geval uit zoals het in het echt ook is.
eggie (2018-11-15 20:11:29+00:00): Oke, maar potlatch2 gebruik ik alleen voor simpele zaken Editor iD zelf is een kleine ramp.
Het beste kun je overstappen naar editor JOSM. Die gebruiken de ervaren bijna mappers allemaal.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
Groet,
eggie
Royke71 (2018-11-15 20:14:10+00:00): Top, ga ik een keer rustig naar kijken. :)

Groet,
Royke71
surveyor54 (2018-11-17 09:12:34+00:00): Hi lordronin,
die Gaststätte "Zum goldenen Löwen" ist zwei Mal drinnen, bitte eine löschen u. die Historie dabei beachten.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532683989

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/420439208

Gruß
surveyor
eggie (2018-11-14 21:11:46+00:00): Ja ...amenity doctors is de juiste tag. De adresnode van het Kadster ligt helemaal bovenin. Daar zul je op moeten bijtaggen en vervolgens naar de goede plek slepen.
eggie (2018-11-14 21:09:01+00:00): Je kunt beter alles op de adresnode van het Kadaster bijtaggen. Die ligt rechts op het gebouw. Dus niet nog een keer een adres aanmaken. Eigenlijk had de voorgaande mapper dat al moeten doen. Nu zijn er twee identieke adressen. Pas je het aan?
GRoet,
Eggie
Royke71 (2018-11-15 19:45:01+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Opnieuw bedankt voor je opmerkingen. Is het totaalplaatje (= alles bijgetagd op de node van het Kadaster en de onderhanden node verwijderd, die is dan eigenlijk dubbelop) wat je bedoeld?

Groet, Roy
eggie (2018-11-15 19:58:28+00:00): Ja.. die zelf aangemaakte node zou wegkunnen als je de info overzet.
Nmxosm (2018-11-15 07:18:39+00:00): Hallo undsoweiter,

sind https://osm.org/way/644545721 und https://osm.org/way/632633752 wirklich unterschiedliche Gebäude?

VlG Nmxosm
undsoweiter (2018-11-28 18:51:55+00:00): 644545721 ist ein hölzernes Vordach, das direkt an 632633752 (weiß verputztes Gebäude, ein Schuppen?) steht, aber baulich nicht mit ihm verbunden ist.
eggie (2018-11-14 21:06:37+00:00): Denk dat het zo in ieder geval eenduidig is als iemand het museum zoekt.
Zie zoekslag: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/643507999
De website even gekeken.. best de moeite waard.
jqngarcia (2018-11-14 22:59:15+00:00):  Hola, he revisado tu primera edición y no entiendo mucho cual es el propósito de la misma, has creado vías sin categoría, puedes comentármelo para ayudarte a mejorarla.
Glassman (2018-11-15 23:08:00+00:00): Tip: OSM uses full street name spellings - to avoid software trying to figure out how to un-abbreviate names. I fixed the street.
driveassistant (2018-11-26 22:20:16+00:00): Hallo fritzmimi,

du hast hier die Abbiegebeschränkung geändert (Relation 3578228). Allerdings fehlt da noch die "from" Rolle und zwei Leichen sind auch ncoh drinnen.

Könntest du da nochmal bei schauen?

Grüße
driveassistant
eggie (2018-11-14 21:29:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-11-14 21:34:26+00:00): Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64503181
eggie (2018-11-14 21:37:58+00:00): Je hebt helaas zomaar wat lijntje getrokken over andere bestaande ways. 
Al je edits komen daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart. Wat is je bedoeling precies. Je bijdragen worden teruggedraaid,
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-14 21:51:52+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #64504487
eggie (2018-11-14 21:39:02+00:00): Deze changeset zal worden teruggedraaid. Realiseer je dat je edits daadwerkelijk op de kaart van OSM komen.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-14 21:51:24+00:00): reverted by changeset #64504478
abrensch (2018-11-18 08:51:53+00:00): Hallo Udilo,

ich habe die beiden baustellenstrassen von "road" nach "unclassified" geändert, weil über "road" geht kein Routing.

Gruss, Arndt
Rich1234 (2018-11-15 03:02:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to openstreetmap and thanks for contributing.

Is it possible that some parts of your change-set were experiments that you uploaded by accident?

I ask this because some of the features do not correspond with anything  visible in the aerial images.

For insance, you uploaded a way labeled as a basketball court, yet the way is triangular, cuts across half of a house, and has one corner connected to a footpath way.

You also uploaded a way labeled natural=wood, but in the images the way encompasses several homes.  Natural=wood is not the proper tag for a residential area containing homes.

You also uploaded a number of landuse=residential ways that either encompass multiple houses (but not their surrounding yards).  Instead each house should have been an individual way labeled building=house.  You also created numerous of these that appear to cover groups of townhouses, but that then spread across streets to encompass additional groups of separated townhouses.  Preferably each townhouse unit would be an individual way tagged building=house, or for an initial roughin a single way matching the exterior border of one connected set and labeled building=terrace.

You also uploaded a way labeled as a gazebo, yet the way is an odd shape and much too large to be any form of gazebo.

There is also a swimming pool way that encompasses far more than the actual pool itself (the swimming pool way should outline the actual pool itself, not all of the surrounding areas.

You also changed an existing building way into landuse=retail which is improper for a way outlining a building.  Building outlines should remain tagged as building, if you know the building is retail then building=retail would be the more detailed tag to change from building=yes, not to landuse=yes (landuse would go on the surrounding land area devoted to the building).

You also added numerous foot paths where there appear to be no foot paths at all in the aerial images.  These would be improper if there really is no actual footpath on the ground in the areas where you added the ways.  

You also connected several of your landuse=residential ways that surround buildings (and that should have been accurate representations of the building outline tagged with a building=* tag) to navigable ways (streets or foot paths).  Landuse area ways should not connect to navigable ways (See the "note" sentence in the "Crossing Ways" section of this portion of the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways#Crossing_ways).

Please note that the point of Open Street Map is to be a map, and for a map, accuracy is quite important.  Many of your landuse ways that surround buildings only very roughly even follow the building outline.  They almost look like they were quickly drawn while learning how to draw areas in the ID editor, which is why I asked if some parts of your change-set were really experiments that got uploaded by accident?  They almost look like you were learning ID and did not realize you were actually editing the actual live map in the process.
dbpollak (2018-11-14 21:50:17+00:00): #SSCI265
abakus_uploader (2018-11-14 23:30:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
IgorTCS (2020-11-22 16:42:57+00:00): test
Revolta Gardy (2018-11-16 12:18:17+00:00): Revertemos sua edição por mau mapiamento, vias desalinhadas.
santamariense (2018-11-16 14:06:57+00:00): Peraê. Revertemos é muita gente. Tu reverteste. É bom deixar claro pois novatos podem vir a entender que o OSM é uma empresa, e que eu, ou tu, ou qualquer outro somos donos da verdade, o que de fato não é. Também é muito importante citar no comentário qual changeset reverteu esta, que no caso foi a de número 64564503, bem como naquela changeset que tu fez, ter dito qual o número da changeset que estava sendo revertida.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64505766
Supaplex (2019-02-06 16:20:37+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Sandal man (2021-11-18 23:23:32+00:00): Hola, ha pasado mucho tiempo, pero creo que originalmente dibujaste esto.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/644583471#map=14/37.3488/-5.9908
Sin embargo, no hay etiquetas.
Saxonyking (2019-06-14 09:26:28+00:00): Warum bzw. auf welcher Grundlage wurde vehicle=no entfernt?
amoore6 (2018-11-15 16:50:24+00:00): source = digital globe premium
freebeer (2018-11-15 11:30:28+00:00): please fix your app.

you have added the tags for the AOK BaWü to a node in the western us, after i have reported similar errors over a week ago.
freebeer (2018-12-10 08:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65335090 where the changeset comment is: undo buggy addition of unrelated tagging nodes worldwide intended for polygons in Tuebingen germany via a defective gateway
abakus_uploader (2018-11-15 23:30:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
aharvey (2018-11-15 03:26:55+00:00): Hi. Very glad to see you getting involved in editing OSM. I don't want to discourage any editing, and I don't have the local knowledge here, but I still had some comments about this change.

bicycle=yes is an access restriction https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access. in this case it was saying that bicycles are permitted on this track. Does this track really only permit "mountain" bikes but forbids other kinds of bicycles?

If all kinds of bicycles are allowed it should be tagged bicycle=yes, or if bicycles are specifically directed to use this path, then bicycle=designated.

The surface tag (it's tagged as asphalt) is very helpful to routing engines, as it can keep non-mountain bikers on paved paths.

Further to this, I recommend using the mtb:scale tag to mark it as a mountain biking track https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale

Or would that not accurately describe what's on the ground?
aharvey (2018-11-15 03:27:35+00:00): PS. The ACTmapi Imagery is broken in the iD editor due to changes in the service, it still works in the desktop JOSM editor though.
DUGA (2024-10-18 18:01:36+00:00): You don't stop on both directions.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6062091488#map=19/42.645309/-73.795702
OceanVortex (2024-10-18 19:20:15+00:00): Indeed. When I added stop signs six years ago I wasn't aware of the "direction" tag. Thanks for fixing.
mariotomo (2022-09-22 22:38:54+00:00): hi. I see that all your edits have been on the 15th of November, during a GISDay. it's a pity you did not come back, OSM is quite some community. Also, I'm curious about your experience, why you did not stick with OSM?
Palolo (2019-01-04 00:01:38+00:00): @smills19 We appreciate the help, however, in the future please read the instructions in the tasking manager, we only need buildings mapped at this time.
JJIglesias (2018-11-15 05:52:37+00:00): Ese Restaurant Tony Roma's esta en la misma localizacion q el Restaurant Boccacio. Operan ambos o ya no?
Rich1234 (2018-11-15 13:18:22+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for contributing to open street map.

Your cleanup of your prior edits is almost complete.

You still have the building that you changed from building=yes (more correct) to landuse=retail (incorrect for a building outline) that remains present in the live map.

You also deleted a building you did label correctly (the Phoenicia Restro and Lounge) from the map.  Your outline and tagging for this building was correct, so you should have left it in, as it added data to the map, making the map better as a whole.

You also missed removing one of the landuse=residential areas that is almost a rough building outline.

You left behind a small, disconnected, piece of highway=footway that appears to have no on-the-ground presence from the aerial images.

And the triangular basketball court way that covers half of a house and is connected to a footpath that does appear in the imagery remains present as well.  Actually, in the images I see where the basketball court way should be, and the way you inserted in about 44.8 meters away from the true location.

Also, I think I now may see the cause of part of the issues.  ID defaults to the bing images, and sadly, the bing images are absolutely terrible images as compared to both the Mapbox Satellite and Esri World Imagery images.  The basketball court you want to map is just a blur on the Bing images, but on both the Esri (at the right zoom level) and Mapbox images (all zoom levels) the lines on the court are visible as is the hoop and backstop.

So I would recommend that when you make future edits, you switch ID to either the Esri or Mapbox images, they are so clearly superior to the Bing images that you will be amazed at what you can see on the ground in them.
Supaplex (2018-11-21 12:26:56+00:00): 抱歉，你將整片廠區標成建築，應該依實際的建築佔地繪製，如有停車空間或圍牆則應依現況繪製
Supaplex (2019-02-06 16:20:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 16:19:32+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2018-11-15 11:26:59+00:00): Hello, it is Grab team again isn't it?

Please note that contribution quality of Grab editing team is recently brought into question; several parts are proven by auditing and ground verification to be "uneducated", "misleading", or blatantly "false".

While there are nothing which proves that this specific edit is bad in quality /yet/, the act of "creating large changeset that span multiple countries" alone can be seen as an attempt to *avoid auditing*.

Doing this will not cast Grab editing team in positive light, and will give more reason for auditors to call for your changesets to be reverted /in whole/ if they happen to find any mistake.

So, be sure to edit in small chunks that concentrates in small area (usually a single city block or district) and press Upload button to concludes the changeset, before switching to a different area.
man_asa (2018-11-15 11:55:54+00:00): Hi Nutchanon,

Thanks for the feedback. 
I Apologise for the edits uploaded as a single changeset.

After completion of work in chiangmai, I moved to semerang area but unfortunately missed to upload the previous edits .

Please suggest, if there is anyway to correct it.

Will ensure moving forward.

Thanks,
manasa.
bhavyakota (2018-11-16 06:06:44+00:00): Hi Yockie,

While working in this area, I found there are duplicate roads created for entire stretch.
way 644692911
way 644691879
way 644691091
way 644685126

There is already an existing unclassified road in place. Please check the edits in this area and make necessary changes.

Thanks,
bhavya.
RunRunShow (2019-09-26 12:36:06+00:00): Hi angys,

There's an empty way 644695904 highlighted by Osmoscope. Perhaps you had forgotten to tag it, kindly update the way if it's of use. TQ.
freebeer (2018-11-15 10:38:48+00:00): why have you made this road no longer continuous, and added two bollards on either side of the single existing row?

On the imagery, this road is continuous and not broken as it is now drawn.