piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dendik (2019-02-13 14:41:54+00:00): Наверное, вы правы: лучше не делать больших правок, не делать правок разнородных, и внятно подписывать комментарии к своим правкам, тогда ошибки будут сразу видны. На больших правках, если тайловый сервер сильно перегружен (а примерно в таком состоянии пребывает тайловый сервер, обслуживающий российские IP последний месяц), действительно увидеть свои косяки трудно.

Я пользуюсь JOSM и ID примерно наравне в завиисмости от того, что удобнее для каждой задачи. Намотаю на ус, что у JOSM пока что лучше валидация: в конце концов можно правку сделать в ID и прогнать через валидатор JOSM в самом конце.

PS. Ссылка на mapbox дословно отюсда: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#See_also
literan (2019-02-13 17:00:10+00:00): да, с тайлами беда творится (кстати, хороший повод написать сюда https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Operations_Working_Group - я уже), но я нашел выход - перключаюсь на гумантарный слой - с ним почему-то проблем нет
eggie (2019-01-23 16:26:29+00:00): lanes = 2 kan er denk ik beter af. Het zullen geen gescheiden rijbanen zijn met een verhoging.
Je maakt van een tertiary road een service, Wellicht beter residential als deze bedoeld is voor bewoners.
Welk bord staat er vooraan?
Mag iedereen er komen.? 
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2019-01-23 16:57:54+00:00): Er zijn geen borden geplaats en er zijn ook geen woningen aan deze weg.
Dit kan worden gekwalificeerd als vernieling van de kaart !
Reverten van de changeset is aan te bevelen.
eggie (2019-01-23 17:00:44+00:00): Ik zal de changesets reverten bicycle=no zal wel kloppen, want er is een fietspad naast. 
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-23 17:04:17+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #66576074
Leo Slager (2019-01-23 17:04:36+00:00): Ja, dat stond er al.
eggie (2019-01-23 17:08:22+00:00): Eusie.. Ik heb je edits teruggedraaid na advies van een ervaren mapper die ter plekke goed bekend is.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-23 16:21:32+00:00): Dag Eusie.. Je hebt nu van dit deel van de weg een highway=service gemaakt met een fietsverbod en een voetgangersverbod. 
Dat betekent dat alleen die categorieën worden tegengehouden en bv auto's en brommers niet.. 
Een highway=serviceweg is bedoeld als toegangsweg op bv parkeerplaatsen, winkelcentra  en soms een toegangsweg naar een boerderij. 
Wellicht is highway=residential beter op z'n plaats.
Bestemmingsverkeer geef je aan met motor_vehicle=destination
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2019-01-23 16:52:23+00:00): De doesburgsedijk staat open voor alle verkeer. Dit kan dus worden beschouwd als vernieling van de kaart.
Leo Slager (2019-01-23 16:58:41+00:00): Een revert van deze changeset is aan te bevelen.
eggie (2019-01-23 17:03:42+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #66576036
Leo Slager (2019-01-23 17:14:54+00:00): PB verzonden
berndw (2019-01-23 17:49:51+00:00): Hallo gartenglück

willkommen bei OSM

was ist gartenglück?

Um das in der Karte zu sehen sind weitere Infos nötig.
Schau mal hier, ob Du etwas passendes findest.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite
Für weitere Fragen stehe ich gern zur Verfügung

Bernd
DaveF (2019-01-23 23:40:03+00:00): Hi
Is there a reason your adding is_in tags?
Please have a read of this thread
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2016-August/076592.html

OSM is geospatially aware. it can be determined what objects are inside polygons.

Because is_in is hard coded, if an external boundary is amended all objects that mow lie outside would have to be retagged.
LivingWithDragons (2019-01-24 11:08:46+00:00): is_in tags can help describe/address a place when code might make geospatial mistakes. However that should be less likely to happen with me checking and fixing the relations.

It's essentially an old habit that I keep slipping into, especially when there are some is_in tags on the object already. It doesn't do any harm, other than wasting my time.

If Devon boundaries are changed so much that towns fall in a different county, then I would become quite surprised.
DaveF (2019-01-24 15:22:56+00:00): Hi
There's far too much superfluous gumpf in OSM, This tag was only created as polygons were a data form in the early days. Polygons makes is_in tags redundant. The longer the list of tags for an entity the harder it is to find the information required, so increases the likelihood of errors.

Admin/political boundaries change regularly. Is_in tags are added to items other than large boundaries, such as village nodes etc. As you've mentioned contributors copy tags blindly. The "old habit" of copying tags purely because other entities have them does not add value or accuracy to the OSM database.

Do you know any users of the is_in tag?
geodreieck4711 (2019-02-16 13:44:06+00:00): Hallo Hobos,
deine Editis in allen Ehren, Couchmapping auch ok. Auf dem Luftbild ist das Gewerbegebiet nicht sichtbar ist aber ausgewiesen im Bebauungsplan! Das geplante Gewerbegebiet wurde aufgrund lokaler Kenntnisse gemapt. Bbitte mache deine Änderungen rückgängig, wir Tagen nicht für den Renderer!
Hoboss (2019-02-23 16:09:14+00:00): Hallo geodreieck4711,
dort gibt es kein Gewerbegebiet, sondern eine Acker. Meine Informationen beruhen auch auf lokalen Kenntnissen. Woher willst du wissen, dass ich Couchmapping betreibe?
Hoboss (2019-02-24 05:29:07+00:00): Selbstverständlich mappe ich, weil irgendwann die Informationen in einer gerenderten Karte auftauchen sollen. Und dort wo ein Industriegebiet auftaucht, ist keines vorhanden! Auch wenn es rechtlich ausgewiesen ist, bleibt es doch ein rein rechtliches Konstrukt, und tatsächlich ist dort ein Acker. Wenn sich das ändert, kann dies jeder gerne editieren. Aber es kann nicht sein, dass wir Dinge sichtbar in eine Karte eintragen, die in der Realität nicht vorhanden sind. OpenStreetMap soll m. E. die aktuelle und tatsächliche Realität abbilden. Möglicherweise wird dort in 50 Jahren noch kein Industriebetrieb stehen. Vgl. die Diskussion um geplante Straßen. Die sollen auch erst frühestens dann eingetragen werden, wenn mit dem Bau begonnen wurde. Alles andere macht keinen Sinn.
GinaroZ (2019-01-23 16:07:52+00:00): In case you're unaware, this edit was made in Scotland not England ;-)
theArchDruid (2019-01-23 16:09:19+00:00): Thank you for that clarification! My UK geography is not very good.
GinaroZ (2019-01-23 16:10:09+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Can I ask why you have deleted this road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23961265/history
嗨，欢迎来到OSM。 我可以问你为什么要删除这条路吗？
mavl (2019-02-26 17:00:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_6110846 (2019-01-24 06:39:44+00:00): On the territory of Ukraine and the border line with Ukraine - will necessarily Zholon
https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=kkgOAQAAMAAJ&dq=Zholon+river&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Zholon+
Russian fake imaginations Zhelon have no dealings with Ukraine
Your overwhelming wars of editing will not yield any result in Ukraine
The Ukrainian community uses only real names-translations Go against the Ukrainian identity - you can not because there is no authority to command in the territory of Ukraine You can command ONLY 
in Belarus
user_6110846 (2019-01-24 06:43:17+00:00): In Ukraine only the real name Prypiat is used
Russian pseudo-fantasy Pripiat has nothing to do with Ukraine
Forcing Ukrainians to use Fake Pripiat do not have the authority
Your full power command ends with a line of state border
user_6110846 (2019-01-25 12:31:45+00:00): Russian fake name is translated into alt name

If it is very important for you to use only the Russian fake name - write a request in the DWG

No resolution DWG - there is no reason to do revert
All translations confirmed
Write: I am a resident of Byelorussia, I constantly communicate only in Russian, so I want old Soviet translations (fake names) to be the main ones with the status of the main translation. It is inconvenient for me to work with modern new versions of translations
yaugenka (2019-01-26 21:21:11+00:00): Только сейчас заметил, что тогда не все поправил. Вот теперь вроде как все должно быть
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66664433
user_6110846 (2019-01-27 15:42:37+00:00): revert 
I will add alt_name en Zholon

Only the DWG resolution has the authority to prohibit Zholon and source_name en into Zholon

Only the DWG resolution has the authority to prohibit Prypyats into french and source_name  into Prypyats and Pripet



Only the DWG resolution has the authority to prohibit Zholon and source_name en on Zholon
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:07:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:08:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:07:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
viloan (2019-01-23 16:20:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Geo-Tobi (2023-11-19 08:12:07+00:00): Hallo geow,
sehe ich das richtig, hattest du hier das Tag Access=private hinzugefügt? Basierend auf welcher Grundlage hast du das gemacht? Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass dieses Tag hier angebracht ist. Grüße, geo-tobi
geow (2023-11-19 18:01:34+00:00): Danke für dein Interesse. Es war damals (2019) üblich, dass Grundstückszufahrten auf Privatgelände idR ein access=private erhalten. Ich sehe gerade, dass dies im deutschen Wiki 2022 geändert wurde. Diskussion dazu ist mir nicht bekannt.
Kannst es gerne entfernen. Router verwenden mW ohnehin access=private auch ohne explizites Verbot, was in DE mE überwiegend Sinn macht. 
Beste Grüße,
geow
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:07:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
jeka p (2019-01-23 16:45:20+00:00): Hallo!
laut basemap.at fliesst hier Wirtatobelbach.
Gruss,
Jeka
Hungerburg (2019-01-23 19:52:03+00:00): Meine Quelle wohnt in Kennelbach; Auch die Streckenbeschreibungen der ehemaligen Bahn sprechen eindeutig dafür, dass die Kartographen von basemap da irren. (Auch in meiner unmittelbaren Umgebung kommt das vor.)
jeka p (2019-01-24 15:47:45+00:00): alles klar. Schrebe das vielleicht in den Kommentar.
Source:name=
nicht, dass der nächste Benutzer einfach laut basemap.at den Bach umbenennt.
Hungerburg (2019-01-24 18:20:52+00:00): Danke für den Tipp; hier noch eine Quelle - Stadt Bregenz, Dienststelle GIS - https://www.pfaenderbahn.at/Portals/0/download/wandern/wanderkarte2016_1.pdf
mavl (2019-01-24 13:16:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом здании уже есть "Магнит". И ещё какой-то магазин, который тоже, наверное, "Магнит".
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Alex_Mapper (2023-07-18 11:45:15+00:00): Hey, I would like to document the tag cash_in=customers, which I see you've used on this changeset. 
Could you confirm that it's intended use is to show that deposits/cash_in is only allowed for clients/cards of that bank brand (thus not allowed for everyone)?
naoliv (2019-01-23 18:24:09+00:00): Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:07:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
zstadler (2024-09-21 08:37:36+00:00): Hello Mahmoud Daraghmeh Abu Oday,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM!

What is this "سهل المدراج" tourist attraction?

Usually, a tourist attraction has other tags that describe what it is.
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Akkurator (2019-08-09 09:11:43+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193802998/history
Du hast hier "Strauben 4" als Adresse angegeben.
Bist du sicher, dass es nicht "Brielhäusle 4" ist?
Grüße,
Akkurator
Geofreund1 (2019-08-09 10:52:08+00:00): Strauben 4 sollte korrekt sein. Brielhäusle 4 liegt etwas weiter nord-östlich am B30 trunk_link.
Akkurator (2019-08-11 15:50:08+00:00): Ich war inzwischen vor Ort. Passt tatsächlich so wie es ist. Brielhäusle 2 und 4 und Strauben 4 sind aufwändig ausgeschildert - kann man gut verstehen, findet sonst keine Sau.
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
woodpeck (2019-02-03 11:01:47+00:00): What are "asd fixes"?
jmapb (2019-01-30 01:12:07+00:00): Hi -- Looks like you changed the name= but there's still a name:en= with the old name -- is this intentional? (Also guessing that this node should be moved inside the building perimeter...) Thanks, J
daniel_solow (2019-02-01 04:46:59+00:00): It shouldn't have the old name at all. I couldn't see all the tags on the OSMAnd app when I was in front of the restaurant so thank you for pointing it out. And yeah it should be moved. I'll change it
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 00:34:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66583657 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
jqngarcia (2019-01-23 22:06:30+00:00): Hola, no se que has querido hacer, pero desde luego un edificio de esas dimensiones no existe, si necesitas que te echemos una mano, contacta conmigo y la comunidad OSM Catala te podemos ayudar
viloan (2019-01-23 17:19:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:08:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
Denis_Helfer (2022-12-29 18:19:28+00:00): Je suis dubitatif sur la présence d'un pont-rail à cet endroit. Rien de signalé dans l'opendata SNCF.  La voie piétonne traverse vraiment ?
Carto'Cité (2023-01-04 17:16:26+00:00): Bonjour Denis,
Je ne suis pas à l'origine du pont mais peut-être que mes échanges avec ce contributeur peuvent de donner des informations : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66397111
Peut-être que le passage piéton est un tunnel et qu'il faut supprimer le pont.
Charles
Denis_Helfer (2023-01-05 09:49:46+00:00): Bonjour Charles,
Ok vu pour l'échange. Je supprime le pont. Merci de ton retour
viloan (2019-01-23 17:24:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Stereo_repair (2019-01-24 03:07:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66585550 where the changeset comment is: Reverted xenophobic vandalism
SHARCRASH (2022-08-21 18:29:44+00:00): Hi! I see you contribute a lot so i think it's worth giving you an advice. Time to time farmer's fields get reshaped, fences as well, and even get changed of type (from specific meadow to more another general crop). I guess they need to adapt to market or expenses, etc... Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665640853 and surroundings. 

It's a pity that all your work has become obsolete and someone has to update.

So what i suggest you is to make fields of the same type as big as possible, do not care about smaller plots (it's the same tag and it's very rare that contributors will add the crop to differentiate the field). Landuses farmland and meadow have an obvious and interesting difference worth plotting separately. Cut if there are fences to include it in the landuse area, you won't need to update 2 separated elements, the fences inside with be single elements as well. Careful with 2 adjacent areas having a barrier included in their respective area, the portion adjacent is considered as duplicated, and any renderer will make a bigger line. So in this case plot the barrier separately on the smallest area of the bunch. Hope will be interesting for you.

Another point: you had added this area in 2019 January but used 2016 aerial photos. Also for  the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9623914250 from its stream we can see with most recent SPW that the water doesn't pass anymore there since 2018. Your node is very recent though. Do the aerial images get provided that late in BE?

Happy mapping!
tux67 (2019-01-24 10:18:03+00:00): solange building=yes drinsteht bleibt es auf der Karte - hier hast du es richtig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291914550
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66576783
mavl (2019-02-26 17:00:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
JP Estanislau (2019-01-23 17:58:15+00:00): Lamento. Como autor dessa edição, percebi apenas posteriormente que as dimensões do elemento edifício estavam corretas, e que apenas era necessário adicionar uma elemento 'área residencial' para complementar. Corrigir essa edição logo em seguida.