piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DaveF (2017-07-13 20:37:55+00:00): Hi Rowland
To map entities with voids in the middle we use mulipolygon relations: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507315798
BCNorwich (2017-07-22 12:24:12+00:00): I've pointed out this problem (through changeset comments) to mapper Rowland many times and corrected dozens of these instances. Despite this there has been no response from Rowland and data continues to be added incorrectly. 
Rowland also maps land/building areas on top of existing land/building areas.
I've sent a couple of Emails to Rowland via OSM messaging but not had any response.
DaveF (2017-07-22 15:43:16+00:00): Rowland was/is under an acknowledgement ban so unable to message via changeset, but I did receive a DM (although it didn't really address my concerns). It's surprising someone with 7K edits is unaware of MPs & his 'blitzkrieg' mapping technique of not tidying up after himself is *very* annoying.
Rowland (2017-07-22 20:32:55+00:00): Dozens is a little bit of an exaggeration, as it was once this year, and once in 2015
BCNorwich (2017-07-23 05:37:46+00:00): Yes once this year and once in 2015 are the commented changesets.

Dozens is likely an understatement. Your attention was probably only drawn to the ones I commented on (even though the comments seemed to provoke no response). The dozens of self intersecting outlines on areas (buildings, water, woods)  were corrected with no comments being made on your changesets. I soon realised that you were going to continue with no change to your mapping methods, so the easiest way to rectify anomalies was just to edit them and say no more.

But this is all in the past and it's likely better for everyone (and OSM) if we all move forward from here to make a better map.
Regards Bernard
DaveF (2017-07-13 20:48:06+00:00): Hi again
The two landuse=industrial areas you've added appear to overlap existing areas & stretch into land own by other companies or is public land. If you have additional data could you add it to existing objects.
ndm (2017-07-13 23:16:57+00:00): School would ideally use multipolygon.

Nursing Home might not be a good match for a hospital -- there's a couple of different options documented in the wiki.
Rowland (2017-07-15 13:20:05+00:00): Per the source, the pound for the port after per there OS openmap local data. Will take a look at the multi polygons.
DaveF (2017-07-15 21:31:47+00:00): I'm unclear what you mean. I've looked at the OS Open Map - Local data for the area & see no boundary. Is there an on-line version of what you're using as data?

Could you explain what 'Tayberry' is? Is it an editor or an importer?
SomeoneElse (2017-07-19 09:34:14+00:00): I suspect that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507316742 is mistagged.  It's tagged as a hospital, but the name suggests it's a nursing home.  Have a look in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ for things like "nursing home" "care home" and "healthcare" and "social" (and have a look in the wiki too).
DaveF (2017-07-19 13:03:27+00:00): Social facility is probably what's required: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility
ndm (2017-07-19 20:51:16+00:00): I've redrawn from Bing and tagged as amenity=nursing_home as per JOSM defaults for "Nursing Home".
ndm (2017-07-19 20:55:11+00:00): I redrew Penny Brohn as well -- not sure about Bristol Port -- should at least be a relation? Probably needs extensive redrawing/reverting?
DaveF (2017-07-20 09:39:38+00:00): In JOSM There's also the newer amenity=social_facility as an umbrella value for all variants as list in the link I provided above, which seems sensible development to me

The two main problems I have with the port is 
1) it's tagged as industrial which duplicates existing area
2) it does tie in with what I saw on the ground. The public bridleway to Portishead was definitely outside the fence last time I rode it. (admittedly a few years ago)
DaveF (2017-07-20 12:11:27+00:00): Correction: "it *doesn't* tie in "
ndm (2017-07-20 19:20:36+00:00): I walked the bridleway ~2 months ago -- it's outside of the fenced industrial area. I note the original industrial area is still "underneath" the larger -- as is the foreshore, part of the coastline/inlets and a wildlife corridor I added a while ago.
eggie (2017-07-13 16:19:58+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-13 16:27:24+00:00): In editor iD zit helaas een fout. Je krijgt gratis footway=sidewalk
Dat zou betekenen dat aan het wandelpad nog een voetpad vastzit. footway=side_walk moet er dus af.
Je zult dus steeds rekening moeten houden met die BUG. Doe je het zelf.
bicycle=dismount routeert overigens wel voor fietsers. Je krijgt op sommige kaarten een afgestapte fietser als symbool.
mavl (2017-07-13 16:27:19+00:00): Hello Seznam2. This changeset addes tag "source:population=Russian Wikipedia". I think that it is wrong because there is no wiki page "городской округ Тюмень" in wikipedia. The wiki page "Тюмень" contains population=744 554. You added population=720 575. I offer to delete your information.
Alexander-II (2017-07-13 16:47:02+00:00): Привет. Mavl, это какой-то сомнительный господин с питон скриптами. В чате ру-осм телеграмма наткнулись на другой его аккаунт https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Seznam , где она за 3 дня после регистрации сделал 600 пакетов правок.
mavl (2017-07-13 17:10:08+00:00): Привет, Alexander-II. Есть примеры разрушительных действий от этих учётных записей?  Участнику Seznam я сегодня написал [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50248917].  
  
Мне ничего катастрофического пока не попадалось. Вероятно, человек использует википедию в качестве источника численности населения и названий на английском языке, но делает это не всегда правильно.
Alexander-II (2017-07-13 17:19:51+00:00): Бегло поглядев на правки, разрушительного не увидел (на все 600 поглядеть тяжеловато). Разве что сомнительность англоязычных названий. Уж очень похоже это на транслитерацию, которой не место в name:en. Мне кажется, если бы не дробление по ~1 изменению на пакет, такую деятельность расценили бы как автоматическую правку без обсуждения с сообществом.
mavl (2017-07-13 17:26:03+00:00): Alexander-II, у меня сложилось впечатление, что в качестве названия на английском языке просто берётся название страницы на этом языке, например name:en=Pokrovskoye, Tyumen Oblast. Это, конечно же, неправильно. Название региона не нужно включать в название населённого пункта. А само название можно было бы добавить, раз уж оно используется в википедии.
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2017-07-13 13:17:36+00:00): This was actually Kvannkjosen, not Nordfugløy.
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-14 05:20:32+00:00): No point in adding this node. Taybeh already exists on the map.
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-14 05:19:44+00:00): Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only.
letihu (2017-08-16 19:47:45+00:00): Warum sind diese node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4968494492/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4968494486/history
nicht miteinander verbunden?
Geogenau (2017-08-23 18:35:46+00:00): Das war keine Absicht und einfach ein Eingabefehler. Danke für den Hinweis, ist Korrigiert.
mcliquid (2021-09-29 09:36:46+00:00): Hi JFiedler, was genau möchtest du mit "classe=espace" ausdrücken?
mcliquid (2022-04-01 12:06:16+00:00): Erledigt.
BCNorwich (2017-07-24 07:45:37+00:00): Way: 507325975 remove self intersection of area outline and courtyard
BCNorwich (2017-07-24 07:49:18+00:00): Way: 507325954 same
BCNorwich (2017-07-24 07:53:07+00:00): Way: 507325955 same
BCNorwich (2017-07-24 07:59:06+00:00): Way: 507326037 and again
angys (2017-07-16 12:40:12+00:00): 请不要直接改正名字，若要使用繁体请用zh-hant
angys (2017-07-16 12:40:18+00:00): please revert the name:zh to original one .Traditional chinese script should use name:zh-hant not use the brackets.This already violate and can be mark as vandalism.
Carson_gor (2017-07-16 13:01:50+00:00): Traditional chinese is the original zh.
Carson_gor (2017-07-16 13:06:12+00:00): I respect the cultural differences, not on that side, this change is reasonable, not vandalism, please respect the cultural differences.

Simplified Chinese is use the zh-Hans.
angys (2017-07-16 13:08:40+00:00): 不是，试想像中华民国被改为台湾省你会高兴吗？超过13亿人使用简体，而且繁体又不是没有，如Cyprus就是用繁体阿，如果你这样做，之后又会有人换掉，只是在浪费时间而已，倒不如去编写维基百科。
Carson_gor (2017-07-16 13:10:56+00:00): 所以我在平衡地令各方都可合理地使用地圖.
在外掛程式中不少只有zh 選擇.
這樣修改可使地圖標籤更公平
Carson_gor (2017-07-16 13:11:36+00:00): 在歐美華人社區絕大使用繁體
Carson_gor (2017-07-16 13:13:28+00:00): 繁簡也並存在地圖上,是更好的選擇
你的例子可以是使用(台湾).就足夠
angys (2017-07-16 13:15:13+00:00): 好吧我退让一步，可是不要用（），请用简体/繁体
Carson_gor (2017-07-16 13:18:36+00:00): 謝謝 
thank you so much let us put the osm to the new stage
Carson_gor (2017-07-16 13:19:30+00:00): in next few days ,i will change those tags to SS/TT
angys (2017-07-16 13:22:34+00:00): 只是不要连全名都放进去，比如华盛顿哥伦比亚特区/華盛頓哥倫比亞特區，如果在MAPS.ME等软件看的话真的很奇怪（放华盛顿DC即可）
ika-chan! (2017-09-20 12:51:10+00:00): I am kinda concerned that you are duplicating existing roads. Can you please try integrating your survey results to the existing roads?
npapa (2017-09-27 08:34:53+00:00): Sorry friend. It was a  project for my work. You can erase whatever you want.
I don't remember how to do it myself.
Sorry again if caused any problems...
RicoElectrico (2017-07-13 21:36:24+00:00): Hi, can you explain what you meant? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449801358

Was that supposed to be addr:place? Keep in mind that it excludes addr:city. For quite a while the post office is not a part of such village addresses.
lossaez (2017-07-14 07:04:03+00:00): All that area is called Dąbrowa. It doesn't arrive to be a city, but if you consider as city, then place can be excluded.
They were private grounds now divided into chunks but there are not road names in most of them so everything is called Dąbrowa with the ground number (most of it number 4) and the house letters that are not ordered neither. 
Post office is Banino, so the town next to.
angys (2017-07-16 12:39:49+00:00): 请不要直接改正名字，若要使用繁体请用zh-hant
angys (2017-07-16 12:39:57+00:00): please revert the name:zh to original one .Traditional chinese script should use name:zh-hant not use the brackets.This already violate and can be mark as vandalism.
bhousel (2017-07-13 18:04:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
angys (2017-07-16 12:39:34+00:00): 请不要直接改正名字，若要使用繁体请用zh-hant
angys (2017-07-16 12:39:41+00:00): please revert the name:zh to original one .Traditional chinese script should use name:zh-hant not use the brackets.This already violate and can be mark as vandalism.
Athalis (2017-07-24 19:34:24+00:00): Hallo Sumpfschilkamel,

der Schlüssel "network" wird benutzt um den Verkehrsverbund anzugeben (siehe auch das Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:network?uselang=de#.C3.96ffenlicher_Verkehr). Die Angabe der Linien erfolgt über Relationen, wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1856402#map=18/50.12950/8.69392
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 10:22:18+00:00): Way: 507330969 self intersection fixed.
angys (2017-07-16 12:39:16+00:00): 请不要直接改正名字，若要使用繁体请用zh-hant
angys (2017-07-16 12:39:23+00:00): please revert the name:zh to original one .Traditional chinese script should use name:zh-hant not use the brackets.This already violate and can be mark as vandalism.
BCNorwich (2017-09-04 06:32:22+00:00): Way: 507335422
Removed self intersection, tagged courtyard
BCNorwich (2017-08-12 16:40:41+00:00): Way: Holy Family Catholic Church (507336776) fixed the self intersection of the area outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-12 16:45:38+00:00): Way: 507336773 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 10:03:30+00:00): Way: 507336761     fixed self intersection problem of the area outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 10:08:23+00:00): Way: 507336757 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 10:11:53+00:00): Way: 507336755 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 10:16:23+00:00): Way: 507336735 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 10:19:34+00:00): Way: 507336801 fixed self intersection problem of the area outline
zstadler (2017-07-21 08:32:47+00:00): Hi Mr. Massri,
.
Please try to set the role of every member in a multipolygon. Leaving an empty role is deprecated, and an "outer" role is expected.
.
I've set the role of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507336645 to "outer".
.
Thanks!
Mr Massri (2017-07-21 13:49:11+00:00): Hi Zeev,
Thanks for your attention. I've missed that.
osmviborg (2017-07-13 15:30:12+00:00): FYI så hedder det lille vejstykke på byggetompen stadig 'Nørre Havnegade'.
AsgerFrank (2017-07-13 16:51:37+00:00): Uimodsigeligt. Ikke noget der tyder på at kommunen har ændret eller nedlagt navnet. Har tilføjet det igen, samt byggeplads-lågen.
Alexander-II (2017-07-13 18:18:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо, что добавили информацию. И добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap. Пару замечаний по вашей правке, но в целом она хороша для первого раза. 1) В поле name= вы указали "Мамы в моде. Товары для мам и малышей." Это поле предназначено только для названий (имен собственных). Исходя из информация с сайта, название магазина "Мамы в моде". Вторую часть можно дополнительно занести в тег description=, но правильней было бы указать это через соответствующие теги shop=clothes + clothes=women;babies;children Объекты в OSM описываются при помощи тегов, а не словами. 2) Указывать адресную информацию на территории РФ на точке интереса не имеет смысла. Важно лишь, чтобы точка находилась внутри контура здания. Адрес будет использоваться указанный на здании. 3) Номер телефона рекомендуется записывать отбивая код города пробелами или знаком минуса: +7 925 9238779 или +7-925-9238779 4)  Указывать номер павильона в addr:housenumber= неверно. Это поле только для номеров домов и там строгое форматирование (иначе поиск по адресу работать не будет). Для указания номера павильона стоит использовать тег addr:door=*. Для указания этажа - тег level=*
Ну и мапсми не предназначен для сколько-нибудь серьезного редактирования. Для этого вы можете воспользоваться одним из настольных редакторов. Например: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit или http://josm.ru/ 

Основная база знаний по проекту находится в вики http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page Есть русскоязычный форум forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21 и канал в телеграмме https://t.me/ruosm

Ошибки я сейчас исправлю.
angys (2017-07-16 12:38:54+00:00): 请不要直接改正名字，若要使用繁体请用zh-hant
angys (2017-07-16 12:39:02+00:00): please revert the name:zh to original one .Traditional chinese script should use name:zh-hant not use the brackets.This already violate and can be mark as vandalism.
BCNorwich (2017-08-12 15:06:09+00:00): Way: 507338139 fixed self intersection of area outlines.
lawdt (2017-08-22 07:11:20+00:00): Привет! нехорошо использовать карту для выражения своих личных эмоций. Прошу вернуть нормальные названия Школе, и дому.
angys (2017-07-16 12:32:18+00:00): 请不要直接改正名字，若要使用繁体请用zh-hant
angys (2017-07-16 12:38:43+00:00): please revert the name:zh to original one .Traditional chinese script should use name:zh-hant not use the brackets.This already violate and can be mark as vandalism.
Carson_gor (2017-07-16 12:58:49+00:00): 簡體請使用zh-Hans

請不要把中文只作簡體中文使用
eggie (2017-07-13 16:28:45+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
Sysem (2017-09-30 17:04:07+00:00): Hi,
macht es wirklich Sinn die Gebäude auf dem Merck-Gelände mit addr-tags zu versehen? Falls ja, kannst du diese Einträge im Bezug auf Postleitzahlen überprüfen - hier gibt es Differenzen. Würde mich über Reaktion und Rückmeldung freuen, danke
jimmy6k (2017-09-30 20:03:57+00:00): Da stimme ich dir zu. Der Gedanke war an das Bestehende anzuknüpfen, aber macht in der Tat keinen Sinn. Deswegen habe ich die Einträge auch nicht weiter verfolgt.
Sysem (2017-10-01 09:37:06+00:00): danke für die Rückmeldung, ich werde die entsprechenden addr-tags entfernen.
angys (2017-07-16 12:38:26+00:00): 请不要直接改正名字，若要使用繁体请用zh-hant
angys (2017-07-16 12:38:34+00:00): please revert the name:zh to original one .Traditional chinese script should use name:zh-hant not use the brackets.This already violate and can be mark as vandalism.
marinad_telenav (2018-01-09 16:11:31+00:00): Hi. I would like to be sure that this road( way 65056326 ) is affected by the surrounding construction project and this is the reason why it doesn't have a highway tag. Is this correct?
Dr Kludge (2018-01-15 18:35:52+00:00): I removed the highway tag as a conservative first step for the changes to the subdivision.  I think part of this subdivision will be removed. I wanted to make sure before adjusting West Belleview Street. I have not been down this way in six months.  You can see adot images here https://www.flickr.com/photos/arizonadot/sets/72157681461022065/ raveneye has some Mapillary flyover images of the area and it looks like raveneye took some ground images from 12/2017 https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/raveneye?lat=33.45648499997219&lng=-112.18558166666668&z=18.49488560393603&pKey=QZRLblkXmnU-HPNDJ8qwVA&focus=photo

I believe DGDEAGLE change sets as a new user were too aggressive.  The road construction left some buildings in the apartment place and along North 59th Avenue.
marinad_telenav (2018-01-16 13:11:45+00:00): Many thanks for your answer. I was looking on the OpenStreetCam images, and I saw that in an image from Dec 11th, the road was navigable http://internal.openstreetcam.org/details/984139/1120
Dr Kludge (2018-01-21 03:53:47+00:00): I added the tags back.  I just drove the area again today.  The images are still being uploaded. The sound wall has been built.  We will have to wait for some more time to pass.  It almost looks like this column will take the ramp right through the some of the houses including the relocation of power lines. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/lkIms45yUG9-PZPpYfssaw  I don't know if more houses will be removed after the owners are moved out.   Half of the apartment buildings still exists.  If you zoom in on this photo, then you can see that the electric meters have been removed. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/4cE8jsx9ixd8UpIlaII6PA  These buildings could be on the way out also.
Dr Kludge (2018-01-21 04:43:39+00:00): Oh!  Here is some more information on the South Mountain Freeway.  The images are interesting along with the schedule.
Dr Kludge (2018-01-21 09:48:46+00:00): https://www.azdot.gov/projects/central-district-projects/loop-202-(south-mountain-freeway)
eggie (2017-07-13 16:34:53+00:00): correct.. het is altijd even zoeken. Soms liggen er meer adresnodes op elkaar. 'k heb 258 zo verschoven dat je 'm wel ziet straks.
stephankn (2018-03-16 21:43:31+00:00): way 507348977: leads to farmland. residential not justified
woodpeck (2017-10-03 00:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
der-On (2017-07-26 18:02:15+00:00): Add children playground
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-13 18:22:57+00:00): Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap (the map you are editing with Maps.ME) is a public map. If you want to bookmark things, use the bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only.
eggie (2017-07-13 16:18:46+00:00): Helemaal correct
luschi (2018-02-18 14:18:39+00:00): Hallo Kalinka,
was heißt hier access=designated?
Dieser Key sagt nichts aus.
Ist die Straße für Fahrzeuge gesperrt, sollte vehicle=no verwendet werden.
Weitere Verkehrszeichen wie Gewicht oder Länge kann auch erfasst werden.
Bitte um Rückmeldung.
lg
Kalinka (2018-02-18 18:58:32+00:00): Ich war dort damals im Urlaub und hab mit einer neuen App getagged. Ich kann jetzt leider auch nichts mehr dazu sagen. Ich vermute, es war eine Art Anlieger Frei Straße.
SomeoneElse (2023-12-16 19:05:57+00:00): Is the name here really "Auto Electricial"?  "Auto Electrical" (without the second "i") would be more likely.
Corban8 (2024-01-02 23:00:20+00:00): Hello,

Yes I believe that would make more sense. the "Auto Electricial" with an extra i was most likely a typo on my part. It would make sense to change it to "Auto Electrical" like you suggested.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-02 23:24:14+00:00): Thanks - done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145817976
pantufla (2024-01-18 18:54:35+00:00): ?
GerdP (2018-10-31 16:19:50+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed some ways tagged as highway=escalator. Did you know the tag conveying? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying
The ways are not connected to the road network, so they will probably not help for routing, see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507362405
dgitto (2017-07-19 13:45:41+00:00): Ciao. Per mappare un oggetto non basta il solo tag "name". bisogna specificare di cosa si tratta. altrimenti è un oggetto indefinito. Il parcheggio si mappa con amenity=parking, ad esempio
dgitto (2017-07-19 13:49:48+00:00): La key "name" serve a specificare il nome proprio di un oggetto, per quegli oggetti che hanno un nome proprio. Una casa non ha nome "casa". Solo alcuni edifici prevedono un nome, come nei casi di Villa Flavia; Palazzo Bertolazzi Strozzi; Colosseo; Condominio Arcobaleno; etc.
eggie (2017-07-13 19:03:04+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
eggie (2017-07-13 19:07:41+00:00): Je hebt gebouwen een andere vorm gegevens en één voorzien van een adres. Adressen zitten niet op gebouwen maar op de al aanwezige adresnodes. Ook de info over het bedrijf hoort op de adresnode. Zou je het zelf kunnen aanpassen?
eggie (2017-07-13 21:47:40+00:00): ik heb het aangepast. info verplaatst naar adresnode.
literan (2017-07-14 11:54:26+00:00): дворовые проезды - это highway=service. highway=living_street это именованные пешеходные улицы, как Арбат или Столешников. Исправляю.
Dilon Pait (2017-07-15 18:43:24+00:00): Понятно. Буду ставить проезды для простоты
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-13 18:30:59+00:00): You added your house. Please do not add personal things to the map. Use the bookmarks feature instead.
eggie (2017-07-13 19:13:30+00:00): Je hebt de Hoogvlietsekerkweg vastgeknoopt aan de landuse = Industrial. dat is niet wenselijk. Eigenlijk hoort landuse nooit aan wegen vast geplakt te worden. Dat geeft problemen bij verschuivingen. Kun je het zelf oplossen.. geef anders een seintje dan kijk ik er even naar.
dudka (2017-07-13 19:32:35+00:00): щось тут не так з цим звязком http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7391380
Cascafico (2017-07-14 06:56:19+00:00): Coincidenza: ho mappatto nello stesso giorno le due fontane del porticciolo: per par condicio ne lascio una mia ed una tua... e rilancio con la doccia :-)
tamiifrog (2017-07-14 10:05:12+00:00): could you write me in English?
Gh0stz0x (2017-07-14 11:25:15+00:00): "Coincidence: I have mapped the same two fountains on the same day: for par condicio I leave my one and one ... and relaunch with the shower :-)"

You can translate with google translate.
Graf Westerholt (2017-07-16 15:07:42+00:00): Warum trägst du noexit=* auf einen Weg ein? Das trägt man wenn überhaupt nur auf Punkten ein. Und warum trägst du es überhaupt ein, wenn es gar nicht zutrifft? Hast du nicht die Wikiseite über noexit=* gelesen?
Mond00 (2017-07-16 17:49:55+00:00): Ich habe noexit wieder gelöscht.

Der Eintrag noexit erfolgt im Editor JOSM für den ganzen Weg, wenn man "Straßen / Straßen / Straßenbeschränkungen" aufruft und dort den Haken bei "Kein Ausgang (Sackgasse)" setzt. Dann liegt hier vielleicht ein Programmfehler vor?
Graf Westerholt (2017-07-17 05:28:00+00:00): Ja, ist wohl ein Programmfehler.
lcat (2017-07-13 19:22:30+00:00): Видимо добро пожаловать!)
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-14 05:46:56+00:00): I fixed the checkpoints by marking as military=checkpoint.
Nidal Elwan (2017-07-14 18:48:42+00:00): thanks
M!dgard (2017-07-31 14:40:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50722860, 50723915 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
naoliv (2017-09-06 01:26:52+00:00): Lucas, geralmente o navegador possui uma opção para evitar trafegar por estradas de terra.
Alterar a classificação delas não costuma ser a opção correta para resolver esse tipo de problema.