piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2018-02-20 05:39:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. Specially, if same houses on the property have other numbers!
Glassman (2018-02-19 23:01:07+00:00): Please only add features that can be verified by others. OSM is a live working database.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56504801
Hjart (2018-02-19 22:49:31+00:00): Er du sikker på at det er husets officielle navn?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2018-02-20 09:53:55+00:00): Nej.
Men det er dig, der har givet det som alt_name.

Enten skal der ikke være et navn. Eller også skal navne være i name tagget.

Jeg ved ikke om det ligefrem er en tourist=attraction, for så kan det i alt fald godt have et navn.

Nå, men du begyndte navngivningen, så jeg vil lade det være op til dig.
Hjart (2018-02-20 09:57:55+00:00): Jeg er godt klar at de forskellige validatorer melder fejl på alt_name etc hvor der ikke er et name tag, men nogle gange skal man altså lige tage de her fejlmeldinger med et gran salt. De har ikke altid ret
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2018-02-21 08:58:58+00:00): Ja, men her er jeg enig med validatorerne.
Hvis der ikke er et name tag, hvad er alt_name så et alternativ til?
user_5359 (2018-02-20 05:35:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
Drejan (2018-02-20 14:26:24+00:00): Hej! Du har ändrat min bussväg i Alafors och lagt dit återvinning i mitten. Det kanske stämmer med Bings gamla flygfoton men inte med verkligheten!
archie (2018-02-20 16:20:08+00:00): Jag ber om ursäkt. jag gör en revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:21:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Richard (2018-06-18 12:01:19+00:00): Hi - great to see the work you've done here!

Quick note on road tagging: you've changed some roads back from highway=unclassified to highway=residential. This isn't really appropriate - highway=residential is meant for roads which are predominantly access to housing areas, usually in towns/cities and often lined with housing. An entirely rural road like these is better tagged as highway=unclassified.

In particular, in the US, many minor roads were incorrectly imported as highway=residential (from the TIGER dataset) and correcting them is an ongoing challenge.

cheers
Richard
NorCalRoads (2018-06-19 04:25:44+00:00): Thank you for notifying me of that, I wasn't really sure which was appropriate. (I'm kind of a newbie here.) I'll make sure to keep those more appropriate in future, and i'll see if there's any I can find to fix.
Erik
Richard (2018-06-19 09:38:45+00:00): Great stuff. Always good to see more people plugging away at the task of fixing up the rural US so welcome on board :)
tslipa (2018-02-20 15:42:24+00:00): A dlaczego tak powinno być?
maraf24 (2018-02-20 19:48:50+00:00): Nie ma tu wyznaczonego przejścia, więc nikt się tak nie będzie poruszał. Linie highway mogą odzwierciedlać fizyczny przebieg drogi o ile ma to sens, czasami lepiej jest przedstawić sposób poruszania się, a niektóre "chodniki" robi się nawet fikcyjne-wyłącznie dla zapewniania działania nawigacji.
Sam chodnik można dokładnie wyrysować korzystając z area:highway. Ewentualnie highway=footway + area=yes (ta kombinacja nawet się renderuje na tej mapie).
Przywróciłem kształt, ale przekroczenie jezdni zrobiłem "po prostej".
tslipa (2018-02-20 21:19:03+00:00): Co w takim razie z innymi chodnikami dodanymi przeze mnie np. przy Waniliowej/Kminkowej?
maraf24 (2018-02-21 12:47:28+00:00): Jeśli chodzi o np. ten punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5423119829
to przyjętym rozwiązaniem jest podłączenie go do drogi tak, jakby  było tam przejście dla pieszych. Dzięki temu nawigacja będzie mogła z niego skorzystać przy wyznaczaniu dłuższej trasy.
Jednakże znaczenie praktyczne jest znikome - każda droga poza autostradą jest dostępna dla pieszych, więc przy takim rysowaniu chodników routing pójdzie jezdnią, a nie chodnikiem.
Wszystko zależy od tego, co chcesz osiągnać: perfekcyjny routing pieszy czy wizualizację powierzchni chodników.
Matthew Darwin (2018-02-21 18:39:14+00:00): Hi.  You changed the names of "Holmes Street", but not the addresses on the same street.  Please review.
Constable (2018-02-20 08:56:16+00:00): ok, hai aggiunto un edificio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562606991, ora però selezionalo ed assegnagli l'etichetta building=*, senò resta solo come una linea chiusa non identificata
Ciao
Constable (2018-02-25 17:59:36+00:00): nessuna risposta, provvedo io
JohnHk (2018-02-20 00:22:10+00:00): I need to learn to close my changesets, this also includes Streeter Avenue divider fix.
Carnildo (2018-02-20 06:58:28+00:00): If you add the "toilets" tag to a restroom, it'll show up in searches for restrooms (a very useful thing).  I've taken care of it for this instance, but it's something to keep in mind in the future.

You might also want to double-check the location.  It looks to me like you've drawn the restrooms over part of the parking lot, though I'm not sure how old the aerial imagery I'm looking at is.
mrpulley (2018-05-12 08:56:10+00:00): Just letting you know that I've done a partial reversion of this changeset. 
This way had been deleted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385943805
It's a new road (not present on LPI imagery, but present on Bing and Esri imagery)
When this road was built, there was also a realignment of the junction of Huntley Road and Forest Road, and the eastern end of Sharp Road was closed.
Hjart (2018-02-20 00:20:24+00:00): Det vil blive påskønnet hvis du kan holde arealanvendelser adskilte fra vejnettet.
BCNorwich (2018-02-20 07:44:30+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've drawn the church building and put your POI tags on it.
Regards Bernard
mariotomo (2019-11-21 16:08:07+00:00): Hola Juan Diaz; eres autor de más que 500 restriction:no_u_turn in Panamá. habiendo consultado con Marc Zoutendijk, decidimos borrar toda las relaciones restriction:no_u_turn que has puesto en la base de datos. son demasiado para poderlas averiguar todas, y no tenemos constancia que correspondan a señales de tránsito presentes en el lugar.
mariotomo (2019-11-21 16:09:05+00:00): sorry: Danilo es el nombre.
surveyor54 (2018-02-20 13:47:04+00:00): Hi Test206,

willkommen bei OSM.
Deine Eintragung hat mit einem Park nichts zu tun. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=park?uselang=de

Außerdem sehr unsauber gezeichnet, die Linie schneidet Gebäude u. Straßen.
Ich habe den Verdacht, dass es sich hier um einen pokemon-go-Eintrag handelt.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2018-02-23 08:27:25+00:00): Ich habe deinen Eintrag unter dem Änderungssatz: 56602131  zurück gesetzt.
Carnildo (2018-02-20 07:19:53+00:00): Mind being a little less eager with the chainsaw?  One of the two logging roads you deleted here was highly visible in the Esri "Clarity" imagery.  (The other looked like it was only traversible on foot, if that.)
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-20 01:57:18+00:00): Did that farmer's field shrink or is it the industrial looking thing at the end of the road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56506680
user_5359 (2018-02-20 05:33:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building! Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
viloan (2018-02-20 00:37:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jakka (2018-02-20 14:20:54+00:00): is this correct https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1618374191#map=19/50.85043/4.36130&layers=N do not see traffic_signals
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/UfwUo_rdw7Udlrp_PqRowA
bxl-forever (2018-08-26 12:35:26+00:00): This edit is wrong, there are no traffic lights indeed.  I have fixed this and tagged pedestrian crossings with crossing=uncontrolled.
bxl-forever (2018-08-28 13:27:02+00:00): And the same changeset contains wrong information for node 306139434 elsewhere in Brussels (user claims there are traffic lights whereas there aren’t).
Constable (2018-02-20 11:03:43+00:00): Hi there, please make sure you use proper changeset comments when saving your edits
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thanks
lmum (2018-02-20 13:12:09+00:00): Thanks, noted. You're right that I failed to update this one and a view others in iD.
Constable (2018-02-20 17:08:48+00:00): thanks, much appreciated.
Also, this school names shows up twice, I'd remove one of them, maybe the one on the building.
Thanks
AkuAnakTimur (2018-02-20 04:47:30+00:00): Salam... boleh describe sikit apa first assignment course UTM ni? Nak tahu juga.

Terima kasih daun keladi.
rene78 (2018-02-20 20:41:02+00:00): Hi Norhikmah_UTM, the feature will not appear on the map, if no tags are defined. In this case "amenity=kindergarten". I did it for you.
5m4u9 (2018-02-20 14:23:07+00:00): gracias por añadir la companía de dronebo. corregí de tienda a empresa. outdoor no es en realidad, se podría añadir horario de atencion
user_5359 (2018-02-20 05:31:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag area=yes without any more information is useless. What do you want to achieve with your entry? Also we use the two uppercase short name of the state. (addr:state=PFM) means?
OpenBrian (2018-02-20 03:04:25+00:00): amenity=watering_place ?  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
Constable (2018-02-21 09:30:54+00:00): all those changesets look suspicious and those ponds don't look like ponds on the aerial imagery. Also, those names sound like descriptions, not proper names
Constable (2018-02-21 11:48:20+00:00): Hi there, thanks for contributing!
Are you sure about this park shape? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562631497 according to the available aerial imagery it looks like just a section of it might be a park.
Thanks
Constable (2018-02-25 18:10:55+00:00): looks like you completely ignored my message.
I guess I'm going to have to fix it by myself then.
Whatever
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-20 04:23:57+00:00): Generally FM/RM roads would be tertiary.  Maybe higher if it's a big multilane boulevard in a city or something like that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56508945
clay_c (2018-02-20 20:31:29+00:00): Texas has rather high standards for maintaining FM/RM roads. Many of them connect up with regular state roads in OK and NM that are already tagged as secondary. I believe FM/RM roads should be secondary whenever they form a connective network of well-maintained roads in between state/US highways, which leaves room for lower-quality county and municipal thoroughfares to be tertiary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56508945
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-21 01:03:17+00:00): My concern would be parity with surrounding states.  Typically speaking, state highways default to highway=secondary unless there's additional capacity, and highway=primary would be a US highway, and a highway=tertiary being pretty much anything with a centerline at lower levels or state auxiliary levels.  Defaulting state highways to primary would give an inflated sense of what highways are in Texas versus everyone else.
clay_c (2018-02-21 02:22:16+00:00): State highways and US highways in Texas are often built to the same standards and are otherwise indistinguishable. Sometimes they may be widened, but that can happen anywhere regardless of whether it's a state highway or a US highway. I don't see a convincing case for why similarly-built highways in Texas should have different designations just based on their status as a US or a state highway. It's not "inflated"; it's consistent.
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-21 02:40:36+00:00): > State highways and US highways in Texas are often built to the same standards and are otherwise indistinguishable.

That's fairly typically the case everywhere.

> I don't see a convincing case for why similarly-built highways in Texas should have different designations just based on their status as a US or a state highway. It's not "inflated"

The US system is designed and intended for long distance travel, the state routes are generally intended for town-to-town intrastate trips.

Granted, this is largely bikeshedding given how few options there are available to navigate in the American west, but staying consistent with the majority of states would be a good idea, no need to creep it upwards, particularly with trunk and motorway being special cases above primary.
Heinz_V (2018-04-10 05:25:15+00:00): You deleted part of S43!
Please correct your error
Heinz_V
Carnildo (2018-02-20 08:09:55+00:00): Please don't put descriptions into the names of things.  It looks ugly to humans, and confuses computers no end.
DannyMcD (2018-02-28 20:30:02+00:00): Hi Matthew,
I notice that you've been moving unit numbers into the main address - e.g. replacing addr:unit="A" and addr:housenumber="4" with addr:housenumber="4 A" (for 4 A Crystal Beach Drive).  I'm not sure what this is based on - the city describes "A" as a "Unit ID", and, for most purposes, keeping the address and unit number separate should make further processing easier.  The Mapnik rendering shows addr:housenumber="4" and addr:unit="A" as 4 A, although JOSM annoyingly refuses to display the unit number.

Is there something that I'm missing?
Matthew Darwin (2018-02-28 21:36:51+00:00): Hi Danny,

I love this collaboration between you and me on fixing up the city.  I hope to see you at the meetup on Friday.

You can get JOSM to show the unit number. Install the "QuickLabel" plugin, then View>Quick Label and add "addr:unit" into the column on the right, click "apply on startup" and save. 

As to your question, the city calls these letters QUALIFIER and not UNIT.  Generally when they use QUALIFIER, then I put it in the addr:housenumber field, when they use UNIT, then I put it in the addr:unit field.   The city mostly uses units in apartment buildings I have found.

This is the CSV file:
OBJECTID,ADDRNUM,UNITID,QUALIFIER,FULLNAME,FULLADDR,PI_MUNICIPAL_ADDRESS_ID,ADDRTYPE,POINT_X,POINT_Y
105363,4,None,A,CRYSTAL BEACH DR,4 A CRYSTAL BEACH DR,__3S0GVO,SUBORD,356946.741,5023746.675

I'm open to other suggestions how to interpret this, but this is mostly how I've tagged things.  Sometimes I disagree with how the city classifies things and have an ongoing email chain with them on issues in the address file that I think they should fix.

I'm happy to discuss more on Friday at the meetup if you're there.

My "list of possible errors" (comparing OSM with address.csv) keeps getting shorter with all the great work you are doing!
DannyMcD (2018-02-28 21:59:21+00:00): Hi Matthew,
That makes sense.  From what I can see, the city seems to use "qualifier" for letters, and "unitid" for numbers (a few rare units have both).
I was somehow unaware of the Meetup this Friday (Meetup stopped emailing me for some reason).  Thanks for the reminder - I will attend.
Matthew Darwin (2018-02-28 22:08:01+00:00): Some units are letters like "PH" for "Penthouse".   Like you I started adding everything into "addr:unit" but then I found parks have a QUALIFIER.  Having a unit for parks didn't make sense, so I switched to the algorithm I previously mentioned.

For shopping malls, I think probably we should use unit... but I'm not sure.  I didn't change those.  eg

n4018321997 = "102 C McEwen Avenue" should be "addr:unit=C".  What do you think?   These are not in the city's address file.
Matthew Darwin (2018-02-28 22:08:45+00:00): We can discuss on Friday...
DannyMcD (2018-03-01 00:20:04+00:00): Shopping mall units seem to be little used, and hard to find.  addr:unit seems appropriate when they do exist
I don't think it makes there is a big difference between putting the qualifiers in addr:unit or addr:housenumber, although consistency is good.
user_5359 (2018-02-20 05:50:32+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM! For detail map of the school: Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=school. I have also changed same area=yes to leisure=track / pitch.
Carnildo (2018-02-20 08:12:24+00:00): If it's Sears *Canada* that's dead, then why does this changeset delete a Sears store from Washington?
carlb (2018-02-20 14:40:43+00:00): I've reverted that one node as an error; the rest of this changeset is all Canada (BC, AB, ON, QC, NB, NS) and the entire chain is indeed gone in those locations, but King County WA is likely to be still extant for now.
LivInTheLookingGlass (2018-02-20 17:21:29+00:00): Do not remove real, physical features just because you think they are unnecessary.
parukhin (2018-02-20 05:51:18+00:00): Коллега, добрый день.
Спрошу ещё раз, подскажите, что является источником адресной информации, которую вы вносите?
При использовании данных с несовместимой лицензией ваши правки могут быть удалены https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:How_We_Map

-- 
Николай
fims7 (2018-03-01 14:16:22+00:00): Добрый день, согласно wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr после К в адресе пробел ставить ненужно
Ilgn (2018-03-01 19:34:21+00:00): Вымысле  "корпус"   дом № 20к3
                    дом двадцать корпус три
fims7 (2018-03-02 06:54:36+00:00): Корректно будет 20 к3
smaprs (2018-02-21 23:44:07+00:00): Hi, there can't be a motorway there.  
This is a motorway:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/60/Motorway-photo.jpg  
Please, take a look at classification of roads in Africa at  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
DUGA (2021-05-09 14:17:31+00:00): This area has a lot of features with questionable offsets. My advice is avoid using Bing from now.
jgon6 (2018-02-22 00:30:09+00:00): cbcb77, I see you added the neighborhood names in this changeset, which is great, but you added them as place=hamlet. They really should be tagged as place=neighbourhood. You can actually also draw them as an area around the whole neighborhood and I'll usually add the landuse=residential to that same area. You might have seen some other neighborhoods tagged as place=hamlet, those come from the tiger import, and are tagged incorrectly. They just haven't been fixed yet.
rvidotto (2018-02-20 06:15:45+00:00): Cliquei errado na parte de pedir revisão...
Supaplex (2018-02-20 15:34:46+00:00): 其實用Overpass Turbo可以搜特定的使用者，會比iD編輯更快。
bananatw (2018-03-15 02:45:29+00:00): 好的，下次會嘗試看看。
user_5359 (2018-02-20 17:23:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-18 09:17:22+00:00): In diesem Änderungssatz wurde diese Brücke: http://osm.org/way/26622021 vier Meter nach Osten geschoben. Die Straße verläuft an der Stelle aber schnurgerade. Nie vergessen, dass Luftbilder fast immer leicht schräg aufgenommen und daher verzerrt sind :) ich hab sie wieder zurückgeschoben.
Cascafico (2018-02-20 11:04:44+00:00): Per i sentieri del bosco, di un parco o di montagna, dove si può andare solo a piedi, è meglio usare il tag highway=path.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=footway?uselang=it
user_5359 (2018-02-20 17:09:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the building??
mor (2018-02-20 20:41:57+00:00): ¿Por qué etiquetas una fuente como pozo? ¿tu crees que en medio de una avenida hay un pozo?
Jason Harrison (2018-02-22 02:06:47+00:00): User deleted, changeset contains deliberate spam

Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56566762
GOwin (2018-03-06 07:15:38+00:00): Hi @MarkClarenceAguilon.

I recently noticed your contributions to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Thank you! Kudos for using OpenStreetMap's to create a better map of your community. As you may know, your edit is immediately live in the main OSM (read it like "awesome" 😉)  website as soon as they've been saved to the database, although other apps (e.g. OsmAnd, MagicEarth, Maps.Me, etc.) may take a few weeks (or months) to refresh their copies  unless you do a manual update yourself.

When editing try to be mindful of what you're doing.  It's quite easy to inadvertently move nodes and cause misalignment of roads like you did here:
http://imgur.com/yNunpL0l.png

If you have any questions at all, please feel free to get in touch. You might be doubtful about a particular tag, or would like to clarify their use. Or perhaps, you have ideas you want to flesh out  to improve your neighbourhood map. Or maybe  just want to know more about OSM.  

When you have a few minutes to spare, try the browser-based editor called iD, to edit the map of your community. You may find it quicker and easier if you need to update a lot of information on the map.

There's this concise tips page for Philippine contributors: https://telegra.ph/Awesome-OSM-Tips--Tricks-01-28

Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: https://telegra.ph/OpenStreetMap-LoCo-channels-in-the-Philippines-02-15

Welcome and best regards, in behalf of the OSM contributors' community
GOwin
Hjart (2018-02-20 09:17:48+00:00): Please do not add building tags to POI's inside existing buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56513516
Nuno Salgueiro (2018-02-20 09:32:39+00:00): Good point. Thank you, Hjart. I think you corrected it, right?
Hjart (2018-02-20 09:33:25+00:00): yes, I did :-)
Nuno Salgueiro (2018-02-20 09:34:27+00:00): Ahh, great! Again, many thanks. :-)