piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Martin Borsje (2019-09-11 16:59:53+00:00): Dankjewel

Je hebt het als path gemapt. Dat betekent dat er ook fietsers en paarden overheen mogen. Als het echt alleen een voetpad is (door een bord aangegeven) dan kan je het ook als footway taggen.
Sosha1996 (2019-09-09 14:36:36+00:00): چیا رو ویرایش کردید دقیقا؟ یه توضیح مختصری اگه میشه بدید لطفا.
ChehrehBargi (2019-09-22 08:47:38+00:00): با سلام و درود خدمت آقا سوشای خودمون
تعدادی سرعتگیر، چند باب مغازه، یک راه در حال احداث که قرار هست جاده رو دو بانده کنه و ویرایش نام یکی دو تا پمپ بنزین
ChehrehBargi (2019-09-22 08:49:00+00:00): ضمنا تعدادی هم پل زیرگذر برای آبراه های فصلی هست که جاهاشونو ثبت کردم
Sosha1996 (2019-09-22 08:55:55+00:00): خیلیم عالی. البته دیگه پاسختون دیر بود، اما اون روز همزمان با شما داشتم این معبر رو درست میکردم و موقعی که اومدم آپلود کنم پیغام تداخل داد. خواستم مطمئن بشم یه وقت روی ویرایش شما خراب‌کاری نکرده باشم که با توضیحات خوبتون بنظر میاد همه چی درسته.
ممنون.
ChehrehBargi (2019-09-22 08:57:06+00:00): ارادتمند برادر
KarmaCleaner (2019-09-10 08:48:58+00:00): any reason for remobing residential area Villaggio Punta Sdobba?
alessandrocarmeli (2020-12-20 13:03:29+00:00): Sources?
You have edited. LANES not ROAD:PROPOSED!
Supaplex (2020-01-02 14:29:42+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
korolenok (2019-09-12 16:59:25+00:00): Hi, Quasi-Existence! It seems you really like to map this area with FultonOSM. It will be better if you don't draw the roads where they are not. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74268458
BCNorwich (2019-09-24 08:01:57+00:00): Hi,
The tag landuse=grass is incorrect for use on golf course features, surface=grass should be used instead. I did explain this to you previously on Changeset: 74184053 . As I said before please see this page for golf course tags to suit OSM practice :-  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-09-24 08:19:43+00:00): I've corrected the inadvertant changes you made to the parish boundary making into a track. Please be careful not to do this.
BCNorwich (2019-09-24 08:20:34+00:00): I've corrected many course feature tags, fairways and greens.
BCNorwich (2019-09-24 08:29:24+00:00): I've corrected the tagging to the golf cart tracks and removed the duplicated formal names. (I think I've got the all.

Please have regard to this page :-
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
for your future golf course mapping. It would be good to get a response to the comments meant to help you and all OSM users.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-09-24 09:24:29+00:00): I've corrected the tree tags.
emergency99 (2019-09-09 15:04:14+00:00): Well, why not delete it then?
user_5359 (2019-09-09 16:59:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A single tree isn't a wood! Please changed it to natural=tree
fmarier (2019-09-09 19:44:18+00:00): Hi Steviejp,

Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap!

By the way, the correct formatting for phone numbers in Canada is "+1-areacode-phonenumber". I've fixed Vancouver Water Adventures in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74279330.

Cheers,
Francois
KarmaCleaner (2019-09-10 08:36:46+00:00): Any reason for removing Villesse node?
mvexel (2019-09-10 13:06:46+00:00): Hi, Maxar Standard imagery does not show these roads as completed yet, if you have another source please specify it in the changeset tags, or mark the road as construction. Thanks.
ksnghr (2019-09-10 14:25:49+00:00): Hi Mvexel,

I made the edit using latest Digital Globe imageries and missed mentioning it the changeset. We have clear imageries that the roads are well built and hence reverting it back to residential road (Changeset # - 74314475). Thanks for your update. Will definitely mention the source in the changeset going forward. Please let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
ksnghr
mvexel (2019-09-10 18:32:37+00:00): I looked at both regular and Maxar Premium but neither shows the roads as completed. Could you please share a screenshot that shows the roads are completed and accessible to the public?
freebeer (2019-09-11 01:00:59+00:00): martijn, do you have a way to determine the ages of the imageries you view?  i'd expect a lag of months before the imageries open to osm go live for processing.

except sentinel-2, have you checked that?

i'm betting my last quatloos from the phrasing of the response this is amazon.

this is the first area i've actually seen any difference between the two maxar imageries, and yes, i expect the roads to be complete by now, unless work there is particularly slow.  also, i suspect tagging as construction may persist well after the roads are open lacking an active local community...
gseethar (2019-09-11 13:06:46+00:00): Hi Mvexel,

We have the latest imagery from July 2019. As freebeer suggested, there is a lag in the latest imageries being made available in OSM. Let me know in case you need any updates.

Regards,
Ganesh
mvexel (2019-09-11 16:29:19+00:00): This is what I see with publicly available imagery:

* [Maxar Premium](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/mZ6S6Yr9pK8ePHG)
* [Maxar Standard](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/xi4nPcjQAcEtdF7)
* [Bing](https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/MwNgcNLazJRgrqC)

None of these images show the road as completed. My point is, unless you have some other source like on-the-ground knowledge or some proxy thereof that is publicly available (GPS traces, Mapillary, OSC) these road should  be marked as construction. So I think I am missing your reference to what imagery you are using, because I would like to use the same to update the map :)
gseethar (2019-09-11 17:43:12+00:00): Hi Mvexel,

We have the private stack of latest imageries from DigitalGlobe. The imagery is from July 2019 which clearly suggests that the construction are complete. If there are any local updates much recent from you, we will definitely go ahead revert the changes, Let me know your suggestion.

Regards,
Ganesh
mvexel (2019-09-11 20:59:53+00:00): I see, so this is imagery that is not available to regular OSM mappers. Please understand that this makes it hard for the community to check your edits. It would help if you could be very specific in attributing your sources in the changeset comments, so the community at least is aware that you have access to aerials that they don't. Could you do that in the future, please?
@kevin_bullock (2019-09-12 15:10:14+00:00): Maxar (DigitalGlobe) licenses imagery to many organizations around the world. It might be worth coming up with a metadata tag convention to indicate that. In this case, KSNGHR has a license to fresh Maxar imagery that most OSMers don't have access too. I like still tagging Maxar but maybe we need a "private license" tag as well. It would be interesting to look at publishing a thumbnail of the image used to avoid these types of uncertainties.
@kevin_bullock (2019-09-12 15:14:07+00:00): i.e. the imagery used was not literally the "Maxar Standard Imagery (Beta)", rather a newer vintage of Maxar imagery.
gseethar (2019-09-12 15:29:31+00:00): Hi Mvexel, Kevin,

Our editors generally tag the cases with "Source:Digital Globe". This editor has however missed doing it. I would definitely go ahead advise the editor to be careful and add the same. It does not reflect in the changeset but in the Way ID. Example where our editor used the latest private imageries - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723826066

Let me know your suggestions.

Regards,
Ganesh
mvexel (2019-09-12 17:37:14+00:00): Ganesh -- source=Digital Globe is too generic to be useful. The entire OSM community has access to DG / Maxar imagery. As Kevin said, it would be useful to define some metadata that indicates that this is newer / private imagery that the general community does not (yet) has access to. Lacking that, for now, can you add a changeset tag like "note":"imagery used is more recent than what's publicly available" or something like that?
gseethar (2019-09-12 17:45:27+00:00): True. Makes sense. I will definitely take this up and deep dive if there are any specific patterns that is being followed in OSM and get back to you in a day or two. Thanks a lot Mvexel, Kevin for your inputs.

Best regards,
Ganesh
freebeer (2019-09-13 17:06:15+00:00): martijn, ganesh, i take it as a given that all amazon edits are powered by non-public gps traces, even though it's not stated explicitly here.  it's not transparent to an arbitrary osm mapper-checker and probably should be stated explicitly.

then again, the last edits i've made using aerials in p2, i've followed the general pattern of cycling through the available imageries, picking the one best meeting my needs, and promptly forgetting to provide credit.  thus i would like to thank  kevin for up-to-date imageries in general (offer not valid in parts of canada), mapbox for delightful aerials for much of the us of a, esri where their contributors surpass the alternatives like native z23 imagery in small bits of hawaii, bing at z20, bing at z19 preserved by esri clarity even if a decade old.  and bing in canada where everyone else is years behind.

this doesn't even list more local sources, and i think i've lost the plot, but i want to give a huge thanks to all providers i've failed to credit.

or something.
Howpper (2019-09-09 15:38:48+00:00): Source of name for Park Drive between Grand and Tekoa: https://static.spokanecity.org/documents/parks/manito/manito-park-walking-tour-brochure-2015.pdf
OSM_RogerWilco (2019-09-20 09:19:40+00:00): Hallo maramutze,
es geht um folgenden Feldweg, den Du eingezeichnet hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723179952
Dieser ist an den beiden Enden nicht mit den anderen Wegen verbunden. Kennst Du den Weg vor Ort oder hast Du nur nach Luftbild eingezeichnet?
Gruß Roger Wilco
user_5359 (2019-09-09 17:02:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a node to the bulding, but no additional information. If you need help: You are welcome.
DressyPear4 (2019-09-09 17:55:22+00:00): Olá, não adicione "Park" em tudo que você vê pelo caminho, no caso da praia, já possui tag específica.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74271547
user_5359 (2021-04-22 15:13:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/10020303/history: What is the meaning of the tag "Centre=(Castries)"?
Luuuddooo (2021-04-24 17:23:33+00:00): It was a bus stop name, I don't know why I put it as a tag on the relation. I  removed it. Thanks for the notification
freebeer (2019-09-10 15:54:09+00:00): hallo,
can you look at the only thing in this changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6781625867 , as there are a lot of invalid non-osm keys repeated by the value, so i think what you are trying to do is wrong, with nothing to indicate it is a school, thanks
ivanbranco (2021-12-27 19:41:30+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723188229

what's the meaning of place=*?
IlBano (2020-01-21 22:19:55+00:00): Ciao,

e benvenuto in OSM. Probabilmente sei animato da buone intenzioni, ma purtroppo in questo changeset hai applicato una serie di modifiche diciamo un po' avventate:
- hai marcato la superficie del path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191871227 come erba, ma in realtà è asfalto
- Via del Voltone (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28998380) è stata settata a sentiero, quando, vista la tipologia, era più corretto il precedente valore di strada pedonale
- Via Bernardo Ramazzini (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28710934) da strada di servizio è diventata ciclopedonale, ma gli attributi che ne consentono il transito ai veicoli sono ancora lì. Qual'era l'intenzione ? Indicare che le bici possono passare, oppure che ora è effettivamente aperta solo alle biciclette ? Anche in questo caso la superficie è diventata di tipo erba.
- questo tratto di Via Berengario https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28121204 è diventato un sentiero, sempre con fondo di erba. Questo l'ho già ripristinato visto che si tratta di una strada importante
- Parco del Pacy (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723188273) è difficile da comprendere. Si tratta di un parco a forma di quadrilatero disegnato sopra un gruppo di case. Qual'era l'intenzione ?

Se hai commenti da riportare ti prego di farlo, in modo che possa ripristinare la situazione nel modo più corretto.

Grazie

Ciao
freebeer (2019-10-01 21:16:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75171526 where the changeset comment is: undelete a service drive clearly visible on all imageries.  you are deleting far too many valid existing mapped items that belong on the map.
Nmxosm (2019-09-10 07:49:12+00:00): Hallo BerndHartung, 

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. 

Die in deinem Änderungssatz als Name hinzugefügte Hausnummer existierte auch vorher schon richtiger Weise als addr:housenumber=7 an dem Gebäude. Ein Name ist bei OSM etwas anderes: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Names

Ich habe das Tag name=7 daher wieder entfernt (https://osm.org/changeset/74294118).

Zum Überblick sind die folgenden Seiten sicher hilfreich:
https://osm.org/help
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei Fragen melde dich bitte einfach als Antwort hier, schreib unter https://forum.osm.org/ oder einer der zahlreichen Mailinglisten (z.B. http://lists.osm.org/mailman/listinfo/talk-de) oder erstelle eine Note (https://osm.org/note/new)

Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir erstmal weiterhelfen.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
Hjart (2019-09-09 17:23:51+00:00): Are you sure there's a "giant swing" in there?
Rutesofiam (2019-09-13 07:19:51+00:00): Yes, I knew that was there. I went to find and when I did I added it to the map!
Hjart (2019-09-13 08:02:40+00:00): Ok, when I saw "giant swing" I was thinking of something like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sylter_Rad.jpg, but then realized there's a playground in there with a group of more ordinarily sized playground equipment :-)
user_5359 (2019-09-09 16:57:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note that we only note real things and not game items like Pokemon Parks. Please be sure to do so.

You mark a private garden not a park.
user_5359 (2019-09-09 16:53:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark .
Martin Borsje (2019-09-10 04:27:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2019-09-11 16:57:59+00:00): Volgens de BAG heeft dit gebouw #26.

Wat is het juiste antwoord?
Glassman (2019-09-10 02:07:49+00:00): Tip: upload edits when moving to a different geographic location.
John_Harris (2019-09-10 20:24:24+00:00): Could you explain why are you spreading Russian propaganda, vandalizing settlement names and disputed boundaries?
Kostik (2019-09-10 20:36:17+00:00): I'm not going to discuss propaganda and stuff.
Kostik (2019-09-10 20:54:05+00:00): Rollback vandal edits.
John_Harris (2019-09-10 21:20:00+00:00): I just want to let you know that I won't close my eyes on your vandal edits. And what is more destructive you are not ready for any compromise.
Kostik (2019-09-11 05:37:18+00:00): Similarly.
Kostik (2019-09-11 05:39:58+00:00): You delete languages, change the name of your choice. In my opinion this is vandalism.
John_Harris (2019-09-11 16:54:04+00:00): No I didn't. At the very beginning I've corrected Tsnelisi village area, roads and add building. Biggest part of the village is outside Tskhinvali Region so I've made its main name in Georgian respectively. But you had reverted those edits and left only Ossetian name as the main name. Some users even provided bilingual version but you reverted even their version. You actions are simply destructive!
John_Harris (2019-09-11 17:00:42+00:00): Now about vandalism and etc, before this edit-war actions from your side on Tsnelisi village, you changed dispited border of the conflict region to National(!) level 2 (from 3). You have a lot of edits here and you knew that doing this was against the rule (written here: shorturl.at/qtwCT) but you vandalized Georgian map. These are the real actions of vandalism!
Kostik (2019-09-11 20:26:16+00:00): A lot of words. All objects in OSM have a history, it is easy to see. Who did what and when.
Kostik (2019-09-11 20:29:38+00:00): I divided the village into two parts along the border. No need to remove languages!
John_Harris (2019-09-11 22:59:23+00:00): The main problem here was the village, not the names, all changes were associated with this. Now I see that you have compromised and the problem is resolved. Please do not edit-war again!
blackboxlogic (2021-09-26 20:23:44+00:00): I can't find any reference to Willard School on sanford.org but I don't have the confidence to delete it. Maybe you do? (way 723203997)
ACarlotti (2019-09-09 23:24:22+00:00): This is the second time you've set the slip road as oneway - before repeating a change that someone else (me) reverted, you should check what their sources are and whether the reversion was correct. In this case my edits to 'reopen' the slip road and make the link twoway clearly state that the source was a 'survey' - that means I was actually physically present and saw that the slip road hadn't been closed. Furthermore, I happened to be there again at the exact time you made this change to mark the slip road as closed again, and I can confirm that it was definitely still open at the time. I've reverted this changeset; if you still think that the slip road is permanently closed, then please discuss this further with me.
Greyseal18 (2019-09-10 05:38:46+00:00): This is from the official A14 Cambridge to Huntington Twitter page: https://twitter.com/a14c2h/status/1169898220715036673?s=21
ACarlotti (2019-09-10 15:18:51+00:00): Yes, I'm aware of that announcement (though I saw it on Facebook instead). However, plans do sometimes change, and the reality on the ground is clearly different. In a comment on their post they confirmed to me that:
"the information originally shared was our intended outcome. However, we then decided to keep the slip road open due to safety reasons. All traffic heading out on A1307 Huntingdon Road is being signposted to join the A14 at the new slip road."
"Safety reasons" apparently means avoiding a risk of people trying to get to the A14 and going the wrong way down the exit slip.
user_5359 (2019-09-10 17:48:37+00:00): Hello! This is a very unfortunate change. Yes, this is a new development area and yet an existing footpath is partly used to map an access road. It would have been very desirable to add at least one key fixme='Please check if the path still exists'. 
I was now so free to delete and reconnect the part of the path that certainly can't exist anymore.
I will send a screenshot to the standard email of your company.
rsakunth (2019-09-13 14:24:52+00:00): Hi user_5359,

Thank you for looking into my edit. I had made this edit based on the GPS trace of our driver partner. However, I am thankful to you for modifying the edit as per the local knowledge. Let me know in case there something more I can learn.

Regards
Rsakunth
SomeoneElse (2019-09-12 12:45:02+00:00): This is the third time that you've added this here.  Obviously people are allowed to add things on local knowledge, but everything that you add must be verifiable by other mappers.
What you have added here looks dubious for a number of reasons, not least because the outline added here does not match the previous building outlines you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696541201/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697052800/history .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-12 12:49:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74392300 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some more unlikely mapping in USA.  Attempts to contact the mapper have failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3157
Martin Borsje (2019-09-10 04:26:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2019-09-11 16:56:03+00:00): Dank voor je edit!

Ik heb een kleine wijziging gedaan: het adres komt op een aparte adresnode en niet op het gebouw zelf. Ik heb dat gecoorigeerd.

Map ze!
PLima785 (2019-09-09 23:51:54+00:00): Olá, não precisas de apagar a área da escola, podes juntar ao multipoligno https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Austin Zhu (2019-09-28 12:47:01+00:00): 请勿使用未经授权的自定义图层
woodpeck (2019-09-29 09:46:15+00:00): Hello! The "tianditu" imagery may not be legally used for OpenStreetMap because it is copyrighted. Pleae do not use it because any edits you make based on this imagery will have to be removed from OSM. -- Frederik Ramm, OSMF Data Working Group.
Xv Zan (2019-09-29 11:11:35+00:00): 知道了
m86 (2019-09-09 17:38:32+00:00): lines*, as I apparently cannot spell
viloan (2019-09-09 17:41:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
fkv (2019-10-07 14:57:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75381465 where the changeset comment is: durch einen Sofamapper vorgenommene Verunstaltungen (CS 74275630) rueckgaengig
mavl (2019-10-02 09:37:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
user_5359 (2019-09-09 18:50:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I didn't just revert your changeset because of technical errors. A route is not drawn as a new element, but is a collection of existing path (segments) and points in an OSM object of type relation. An example is a busline as a relation. But for a one-time event, we do not accept this information. However, this information can still be displayed on an OSM map, in which this track is shown as additional information on the map.
RathcooleRambler (2019-09-09 18:20:05+00:00): What was the purpose of deleting everything?
BelfastCity (2019-09-09 21:49:04+00:00): Hi 
Because these just tree and they are not on any search results and they can make extra data in map's database.
If my opinion is wrong, I am so sorry.