piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OrDal (2020-11-02 16:59:22+00:00): The point is, the Palestinian Authority is working hard to get Google and Wikipedia to present their data as "true." (Among other things, the Palestinian Authority appears there as "state of Palestine", although the authority does not meet the definition of a state).

The division are used both by Israel and PA (In PA there a governor for each governorate, and there's Division Commander for each Israeli division)

Here is example showing usage of this Division by Israeli Civil Administration (Message about plan approval) - you will see "محافظة الخليل" :
https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/reports/tr52431/he/ra52-43-1.pdf

You can find a lot of this kind in their site:
https://www.gov.il/ar/departments/civil_administration_in_judea_and_samaria

The division into governorates is really old (since the period of the british mandate - although changes have taken place). It is still exist and usable, but the reason the governorates are marked as "disputed" is that there is no agreement on the areas that each governorate covers.
In addition, the PA divided the Qalqilya governorate into 3 governorates (Tulkarm, Qalqilya and Salfit) and established another governorate - Tubas (on parts of the Jenin and Jericho governorates) and Israel does not really recognize these changes.
 
In the past, I intended to map the governorates according to the agreement areas: to create a compilation of the governorates as recognized by the PA in Areas A and B alongside the governorates as recognized by Israel, in Areas C.
I gave it up for three reasons:
1. It will still not fully reflect the situation on the ground (because the Oslo Accords are no longer implemented as they should have been - Israel is conducting military operations in area A and the PA is also operating in parts of area C)
2. It would be just awfully cumbersome.
3. The situation on the ground can change at any moment (maybe Israel will annex territories? Maybe there will be an agreement to establish a Palestinian state and the borders will change? Maybe the Palestinian Authority will collapse and a new autonomous authority will be established? Maybe Palestinian emirates will arise at all?)
NFZANMNIM (2020-11-02 17:23:11+00:00): Thank you for the response. 

1. yeah showing Areas A, B, C as such a high level of an administrative division never made sense to me. They're merely lines on map. For example, take a look at Al-Ram. And a good point that since 2000, the lines have blurred and lost meaning.
2. Not that I'd agree or disagree with PA's policy of convincing Google Maps to show "State of Palestine", but the rationale isn't the definition of statehood, but rather the UN-recognized name for the WB+GS
3. And I agree, drawing Palestinian governorates solely on Areas of PA civil rule would be ridiculous. It wouldn't make much sense
4. On the issue of administrative divisions being divided by the PA and not by IL, there actually is precedence for such an arrangement on OSM. Cyprus. The Turkish occupation in the North had divided for example Nicosia district to 3. Their solution was to show Greek subdivisions as Level 4, and Turkish ones, overlaid as Level 5.
!bm (2020-11-01 21:11:53+00:00): Hey! ME falsch. Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich = parken innerhalb gekennzeichneter Bereiche. Zumindest auf einer Seite (Neckarstr) sogar zusätzl so ausgeschildert. Nur weil da ständig welche entlang der Poller parallel stehen, heißt das ja nicht, dass sie das dürfen. 
--bg!bm
Supaplex030 (2020-11-01 21:15:44+00:00): Exakt über diese Frage grübele ich seit einem Monat. Da steht sogar ein entsprechendes Schild an der Einfahrt zur Boddinstraße (auf das beziehst du dich wahrscheinlich).

Andererseits: Map what is on the ground. Das ist seit 2018 Dauerzustand... Wir könnten es mal beim nächsten Verkehrswendetreffen diskutieren. Gibts nen illegal-Tag..?
!bm (2020-11-01 21:32:46+00:00): "Map what is on the ground". Sind da neuerdings Bodenmarkierungen für Parallelparken entlang der Poller? Meines Wissens nach nicht. Also verstehe ich nicht, was das soll und was es da zu grübeln gibt. (Sehe daher auch keinen Diskussionsbedarf – oder wie lautet das Tagging für Parken in zweiter Spur? Sehe ich auf der Sonnenallee etc dauernd...) Bevor am Ende irgendein Datenkonsument die Parksünder hier noch in ihren Vergehen bestätigt, revertierte ich das einfach mal: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93382867
Supaplex030 (2020-11-01 21:45:02+00:00): Erstmal kein Veto gegen den Revert, aber da dort de facto, dauerhaft und repressionsfrei parallel geparkt wird, halte ich es nach wie vor für vertretbar, das auch so zu mappen - auch wenn es nicht nur der StVO, sondern auch lokaler Ausschilderung widerspricht. In der Tat wäre dafür aber ein Zusatz sinnvoll, der die rechtliche Situation klarstellt ("*parking:condition:* = no_parking" könnte eine Notlösung sein). Ich grübel mal weiter. Und/oder spreche es mal irgendwo an, OSM-de-Telegram oder so. Was meinst du?

(OSM bildet auch in anderen Fällen "illegale" on-the-ground-Situationen ab - ein häufig diskutiertes Beispiel, was mir spontan einfällt: BMX-Infos an (für Fahrzeuge aller Art gesperrten) Wanderwegen.)
Supaplex030 (2020-11-06 14:38:12+00:00): Oh wow, vorhin gesehen, dass Neckarstraße frei war, bis auf ein, zwei Autos, an einem hing noch ein Knöllchen. Und auf der Isarstraße auch ein paar Lücken. Offenbar ist das Ordnungsamt mal durchgelaufen... Damit ist mein Argument hinüber und es kann so bleiben wie es ist.
!bm (2020-11-06 14:43:32+00:00): Ja, zeitweise wird hier geerntet. Und nein, wir sollten nicht de-facto mappen, aus genannten Gründen.
DENelson83 (2020-11-07 20:39:48+00:00): Thank you so much for putting in the rest of this.
martiensch (2020-11-08 09:02:51+00:00): Hoi edwtie,

Je bent er al wel vroeg bij. De oprit sluit pas komend weekend.
cbeddow (2020-11-03 16:43:19+00:00): Please be careful using the "grass" tag, you are putting it in the location where there are trees. You can add a tree as a point object instead. Teshekkir!
zidel (2020-11-03 20:35:19+00:00): In this case I just disconnected the existing grass from the road so I could adjust the road a bit while leaving the grass more or less alone. I agree about trees vs grass though, it just wasn't part of the HOT task this time :)
cbeddow (2020-11-04 23:12:23+00:00): Ah I see! Hopefully I helped more then, from what I can see. Thanks for mapping!
eggie (2020-11-01 22:04:04+00:00): Hallo howlipauli

Moet het niet disused zijn ?

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned

MVG,
eggie
A67-A67 (2020-11-02 12:55:54+00:00): De rails ligt er nog, dus het is inderdaad railway=disused. Ik heb dat aangepast en de stukjes railway=rail die niet waren omgezet ook omgezet.

Er is wel nog een aansluiting voor de zinkfabriek in Budel Dorplein. Is die daadwerkelijk niet meer te gebruiken?
A67-A67 (2020-11-02 13:01:58+00:00): Volgens Prorail is de spoorlijn in gebruik voor goederenvervoer: https://www.prorail.nl/sites/default/files/spoorkaart_2020_72dpi_2653x3064px_f_nr-12870.pdf
A67-A67 (2020-11-02 13:04:09+00:00): Ik heb het teruggezet naar railway=rail, omdat de spoorlijn dus nog in gebruik is.
eggie (2020-11-02 13:15:10+00:00): Oke bedankt voor de uitzoekerij.. wellicht reageert mapper nog.
Mvg eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-24 00:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120107886 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some personal markers in Ukraine
Rogoyski (2020-12-01 22:20:38+00:00): Rewizja wprowadziła cały szereg błędów, gdzie jako platform oznaczono zarówno zewnętrzną jak i wewnętrzną część multipoligonu, który sam kiedyś miał highway=platform, zarówno obrys przystanku, jak i stojących na nim wiat.
olo81 (2020-12-01 22:36:07+00:00): Można prosić o przykład. link
Jak by było dużo szkód można śmiało wycofać ten zestaw zmian.
olo81 (2020-12-01 22:45:24+00:00): ok już znalazłem
Gallizenae (2020-12-28 10:57:29+00:00): Please don't blindly run the iD validator.
Jethron (2020-12-28 17:48:10+00:00): I don't believe I was. Is there a particular complaint you have with one of my edits?
user_5359 (2020-11-03 05:24:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add objects twice (once as node and a second time as area). Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=House if you has the tag building=yes (for example).
tastrax (2020-11-10 01:10:16+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
eggie (2020-11-02 06:56:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
mariotomo (2021-06-05 16:34:50+00:00): hola Johan. you still actively map? if so, please have a look at this automatic check https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-80.26355&lat=8.63425&zoom=8

it highlights a "car island" that you added with this changeset.  you may want to review it.
mariotomo (2021-06-05 16:43:31+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-79.88223&lat=8.68731&zoom=16
(so sorry, in the previous comment I have sent you a generic link.)
mariotomo (2021-06-06 16:25:25+00:00): 105919384
:+1: :-)
Polarbear-repair (2020-11-02 09:28:15+00:00): DWG Ticket#2020110210000017
syntex (2020-11-20 15:35:21+00:00): Eyvazli is officially in Azerbaijan. Why did you change the border? Or you just merged exisitng borders and someone have changed it previously?
NFZANMNIM (2020-11-20 15:41:27+00:00): OH I did not touch that part of the border, I didn't shift ARM-AZ International border's location. I was only modifying relationships as necessary. But you are right, after doing some minor research, it's Azerbaijan, de jure. Not sure if Armenia will keep it de facto, given that their main highway runs thru it.
syntex (2020-11-20 15:56:39+00:00): I am also curious about it, They stated that they will give Qubadli region away. And this village is officially in this region and in Azerbaijan. So the question is: Is Azerbaijan going to let it be as it is or is he going to make a border post there and stop the traffic? And force Armenia to build a new road?
syntex (2020-11-25 10:30:38+00:00): I am sorry for my accusations I found who moved the border. One user made the change once and had been banned. I think that he has an alternative account and made the same change again. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94379780
NFZANMNIM (2020-11-25 15:40:57+00:00): oh no problem. honest mistake, as I've been pretty active in the region recently.
iandees (2020-11-01 23:01:51+00:00): Hello! Thanks for adding these neighborhoods to the area. Can you point to a reference for the names/areas you put down?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93384173
lmum (2020-11-02 00:50:31+00:00): Sure, Ian! https://www.falconheights.org/residents/e-mail-notifications
iandees (2020-11-02 01:05:40+00:00): Nice! Good find.
maxolasersquad (2021-08-16 15:52:29+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to OSM. When tagging buildings, I'd like to point out a few ways to improve.

1. Do not describe the building with the name tag. e.g. name=Townhouses is not appropriate, unless "Townhouses" was the actual name of the building.

2. Use the "ref=" for numbered items, like numbered building. So instead of "name=Building 1" use "ref=1".
tordans (2020-11-02 06:19:29+00:00): Da hätte man durchfahren dürfen? Undenkbar :-).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93384562
Supaplex030 (2020-11-02 07:39:25+00:00): Sogar sollen ;) Siehe auch die Markierungen in Gegenrichtung auf https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/LfskvdD6lOJR5StGL7kxww
tordans (2020-11-02 09:32:57+00:00): Uff. Ja! Echte NK Radinfrastruktur halt:-(.
Passt perfekt hierzu: https://twitter.com/radneukoelln/status/1321777252724559877?s=21 - Parkplätze statt Rad.
eggie (2020-11-02 07:13:05+00:00): Dag NetDistrict.
Wat veel startende mappers niet (kunnen)  weten is het feit dat in OSM fiets-, wandel- en OV routes lopen op routerelaties. 
Wanneer je die bewerkt met editor iD gaan de routedelen door elkaar.
Het kan wel met editor JOSM. 

In dit geval het Groot Frieslandpad. 
Ik heb het al gerepareerd. 
Het is het stukje track dat je hebt omgetagd naar highway=service. Ik maak er weer een track van. Een toegangsweg heeft geen tracktype grade4. 

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-02 07:16:09+00:00): Verder ziet het er netjes uit.
eggie (2020-11-02 07:19:01+00:00): Het bos heb ik nog even van die tennisbanen gehaald
eggie (2020-11-02 08:14:21+00:00): Eén fietsenstalling heb ik verwijderd.Twee nodes lijken me overbodig. 
Het kan overigens ook als vlak worden gemapt.
eggie (2020-11-02 08:28:04+00:00): leisure=swimming_pool heb ik omgetagd naar leisure sports_centre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool
The tag leisure=swimming_pool should only be used for the water area of the swimming pool. A facility containing one or more swimming pools (mainly focused on swimming as a sport) should be tagged leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimming. 
Was nog een tag van de voorgaande mapper. 
gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-02 08:31:35+00:00): Dit was de bewuste wandelroute.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8830515#map=15/53.0715/6.4486
NetDistrict (2020-11-02 16:50:42+00:00): Dank voor je uitgebreide feedback! Ik had inderdaad een stukje weg gesplitst zonder het besef dat hier een route zou kunnen lopen.
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-04-22 19:42:12+00:00): why added that turns? that dont match the real life! next time check it please. removed and corrected!
David Reik (2020-11-02 00:49:57+00:00): From http://goshen.mapxpress.net/ags_map/ , the Town of Goshen property map, it looks like the falls is on private property, but probably viewable from Goshen Land Trust property, which I put onto OSM.
WingardiumMapiosa (2020-11-18 17:45:45+00:00): Привет, Алекс Немо, спасибо за добавление природных элементов вдоль реки Эш! Я заметил некоторые ошибки в данных от внутренних членов, разделяющих ту же границу, что и внешние члены. Если вы посмотрите на эту вики-страницу (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Valid_Multipolygon_conditions), она покажет вам некоторые действительные примеры моделирования мультиполигональных отношений. Если вам понадобится помощь, я с радостью помогу решить эти проблемы. Спасибо и удачного картирования!

Hi Alex Nemo, thanks for adding natural features along the Ash river! I noticed some errors in the data from inner members sharing the same border as outer members. If you take a look at this wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Valid_Multipolygon_conditions) it will show you some valid examples of multipolygon relation modeling. I’m happy to help fix these issues if you need any help. Thanks and happy mapping!
Gambetti (2020-11-01 23:24:35+00:00): Did not go as intended. But hopefully did. no harm either.
Riemer17 (2020-11-02 07:08:53+00:00): Ja zo ziet het er goed uit, dankjewel!
nevw (2020-11-02 02:27:20+00:00): Hi
you seem to have deleted two pitch boundaries and another shelter and marked a new polygon tagged "Gym=yes" which sits over other buildings seen in satellite imagery to be already mapped.
Has such re-development occurred?
maxolasersquad (2022-01-05 20:50:30+00:00): Thank you for your interest in contributing to OpenStreetMap. There are a number of issues that myself and others have resolved.

1. My House. That will just show up on the map as "My House". Nobody looking at it would know who "My" refers to, and this kind of very personal information is usually not appropriate to add to the map.
2. My Walking Route. This is the same as above. This is a map for everyone so they can find things. It wouldn't be reasonable for the entire world's walking routes as that is not generally useful.
3. "Stop Here" All stop signs are for stopping. The name field is for adding the name of something. Stop signs almost never have names, and if they do "Stop Here" is not likely to be their name.

If you have any questions feel free to drop my a line and I'd be happy to assist you with answering them.
Leo Slager (2020-11-04 15:26:40+00:00): Dag Allroads,
Het meertje in de bocht van de Voorstertocht heb ik van role=outer omgezet naar role=inner.
Dan rendert het weer :-)
Allroads (2020-11-04 15:37:40+00:00): Bedankt, ik wist het, dacht pak ik aan als ik daar bezig ga, kwam daar laatst moet nog veel gebeuren. Nog maar een keer er naar toe, stond tot mij enkels in de blubber, bos werkzaamheden met grof geschut. ;-)
Allroads (2020-11-04 15:38:44+00:00): Waar pikte je hem op? (site)
Leo Slager (2020-11-04 15:52:29+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=5.89298&lat=52.68622&zoom=14
Leo Slager (2020-11-04 15:53:36+00:00): De andere twee heb ik nog niet bekeken.
Allroads (2020-11-04 18:08:24+00:00): Ik ondertussen, nu staan daar nog dezelfde tag op, terwijl het duidelijk twee vlakken zijn met verschillende bome dat moet ik nog verder uit zoeken, poppels en elsen. Bomen er op en dan is de validatie weer anders. Hele gebied, de andere heb ik grof ingetekend, in grote lijnen de gebiedsindeling aangegeven, het punt moet nog even anders. Meer aansluitend.
Link duidelijk, dacht ik ook al aan. Altijd goed om te zien of men wat anders gebruikt.
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-18 08:55:48+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have sent you an extensive welcome message with useful information and links as a private message.

Kind regards,

Daniel

On behalf of the OpenStreetMap community.
user_8466505 (2020-11-12 19:49:32+00:00): Nice job!
Frans S (2020-11-02 14:30:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
You mapped quite a lot of buildings here, however in a wrong way.

High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground.
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing
Please take that into account on future mappings
success with mapping
Frans S (2020-11-03 11:10:43+00:00): Hello.
Here as well I removed inaccurate mappings
Sorry for the time it took to map these.
Best regards
Frans S (2020-11-03 11:04:21+00:00): Checked. Removed some mappings
Sorry
Frans S (2020-11-03 10:57:06+00:00): Checked. Many buildings not correct mapped. Removed them
Sorry
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:40:38+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Firefishy (2020-11-02 07:35:01+00:00): Hi, 

The ways you have created eg: basement exist etc appear to be wrong. We generally don't create roads/paths/etc as areas (closed lines) we do them as single lines. The single line is the center line of the road
Frans S (2020-11-02 13:20:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
High buildings need to be mapped in a separate way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground.
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing
success with mapping
DD1GJ (2020-11-04 10:10:39+00:00): Hi, why do you change man_made=cooling_tower to man_made=tower? cooling_tower is a common tag. You have also removed from the power plant the information about the electrical power and the fuel (coal) used.


You belong to some mappers who in the past few days worldwide only change power plants, cooling towers and chimneys, and probably unintentionally sometimes mess things up. Is there a connection like a project or a university course? Do you do the edits privately or on behalf of a company or group?
cfmccormick (2020-11-04 18:04:35+00:00): Hi, thanks for your guidance on this. I did not intentionally change those tags. Instead, I changed the Feature Type of those towers from "Industrial Building" to "Cooling Tower", since they are obviously hyperboloid cooling towers. However, it seems that the tags associated with "Cooling Tower" are actually incorrect. I will stop using that Feature Type, and revert the previous changes I have made. 

And yes, I am part of a small team of researchers working at WattTime (a US-based environmental non-profit) and Clean Energy and Air (a UK-based environmental non-profit recently spun out of Carbon Tracker). We are building a remote-sensing-enabled system to monitor greenhouse gas emissions from all global power plants. Our goal is to make these emissions more transparent to climate researchers and policymakers.

We are using OSM annotations to improve the precision of our models. Since we have found that some power plants are poorly annotated in OSM (not Heizkraftwerk Herne) we are systematically reviewing all coal plants and adding annotations we thought were correct. We will stop doing this for now, and instead ask for more specific guidance on the Forum about the correct tags and Feature Types to use. (We have not found the existing wiki guidance on annotating power plants to be very helpful.) You can read more about our project (known as Climate TRACE) in this article: https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/fossil-fuels/how-to-track-the-emissions-of-every-power-plant-on-the-planet-from-space
cfmccormick (2020-11-04 18:05:45+00:00): Also, you can read more about WattTime here: https://www.watttime.org/ ; and more about Carbon Tracker here: https://carbontracker.org/  .
cfmccormick (2020-11-04 18:08:40+00:00): One further comment - I forgot to respond to your question about removing the fuel type (coal). Again, I did not intentionally remove this tag. Instead, I changed the way to Feature Type "Power Plant Grounds" which seems appropriate for this area. Apparently that deletes the tag related to the fuel type, which was not my/our intention. As I noted above, we will stop annotating until we are able to get more clarity on these issues from the Forum.
DD1GJ (2020-11-05 09:40:48+00:00): Thank you for the information and for stopping editing for the moment. Worldwide discussions about tagging take place on the following mailing list.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

For example, it is quite common that there are several common tagging methods for cooling towers:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=cooling#values

Here the local conditions should be accepted and the evaluation should be adapted to all possibilities. This is easier than a lengthy discussion and avoids mistakes when changes are made.  A worldwide change without prior discussion should be avoided. 

Special guidelines apply for organized processing of a group. In particular, there should be a central contact person for the community and the accounts used for the action should be marked accordingly, such as Mapbox: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ennui3000
A uniform hashtag in the change record comments facilitates control in quality assurance.


https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Are isabellasr and Ali Rouzbeh also members of the team?