piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wille (2015-11-23 18:11:46+00:00): Legal que você tá usando o OpenStreetMap! Só tem um probleminha: esse tipo de informação não deve ficar no OSM. O OSM é apenas para coisas que realmente existem.

Você pode utilizar o http://umap.openstreetmap.fr para criar mapas usando o OSM de fundo. Eles inclusive oferecem várias opções de estilos de mapas baseados no OSM.

Se você quiser baixar o que você havia desenhado para importar no umap, acesse http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/cTj e clique em Executar e depois em Exportar.

Suas contribuições são muito bem vindas no OSM, porém só devemos nos ater a mapear apenas aquilo que efetivamente existe.

Qualquer dúvida, estou à disposição. Sempre fazemos encontros da comunidade do OSM de Brasília. Quando acontecer o próximo encontro, eu te aviso!

abraços,
wille
Julianderson BrandHaus (2015-11-23 18:44:55+00:00): Muito obrigado pela informação!
brianboru (2015-11-14 13:44:36+00:00): Is this correct? When I surveyed the buildings they had separate signs on each one. Should the Day Hospital be re-named Optegra Eye Hospital Birmingham now the Uni has sold it? Was the Brain Centre sold to Optegra too- web sites are unclear?
GerdP (2015-11-26 13:34:29+00:00): Hi there!
I've changed tow nodes with 
highway=guidepost to 
tourism=information,information=guidepost
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3826983775
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3826191662
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost
OK?
Hjart (2015-11-09 17:10:41+00:00): Det er en rigtig god ide at undgå at lade vejnet (highway=*) dele noder med diverse polygoner (landuse etc) da der er øget risiko for uheldige skader på vejnettet når de gør det og det desuden gør det sværere at finde og reparere disse. Jeg har allerede lagt en del arbejde i at separere vejnettet fra landuse både her og andre steder.
Hjart (2015-11-09 17:13:15+00:00): Oh. I've seen you edit here before, so I thought you might understand danish, sorry. 
Basically, at least when editing in Denmark, please keep highway=* and landuse separate. Thank you
ThorstenNeumann (2015-11-09 18:36:19+00:00): Hej,
Mit dansk er ikke så god. Min mormor bor i Stubbekøbing, men jeg liv i Tyskland.

There are many kinds of handling the mapping of areas and roads. I prefer the using of same knots for both. So the renderer will not surround the areas with white lines along the borders to the roads.

But I can keep them separate in future if this is the common way here.

Mange tak for din note.
Hjart (2015-11-09 18:52:47+00:00): As a very experienced mapper, who's primarily interested in roads, Iv'e spent a lot of time trying to handle roads sharing nodes with landuse and have grown seriously tired from it. Now I'm asking everyone to keep it separate and I believe pretty much everyone in Denmark now agrees with me. Thank you
Hjart (2015-11-09 18:54:22+00:00): I guessed you would have some connection to the area, but then noticed that you're using a german language JOSM, so came in doubt :-)
Georges62 (2016-01-19 10:33:14+00:00): OK 19/1/16
Glassman (2015-11-09 19:53:48+00:00): A couple of points. 1)
The retention ponds should probably be tagged landuse=basin
basin=retention.

2) Did you mean to make the pond part of Duval? The ponds is part of the duval admin boundary. That usually isn't the case.
mayi007 (2019-07-23 08:37:45+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 379399666 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' until node 3827119678.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-08-09 07:17:49+00:00): I surveyed this highway myself and collected the GPS track for it. In addition, between 2003 and 2007, I used to pass this highway as well. So, that's why I justified this highway as a highway=unclassified rather than highway=residential.
GerdP (2015-11-11 08:31:23+00:00): please review:
I've changed highway=residential;path
to residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35234230
MarvinMep (2016-02-10 16:51:16+00:00): O que exatamente você quis dizer com "mas que constam no Google Maps"?

Por favor, não copie informações de outros sites (ou quaisquer fontes) a menos que estes sites expressem claramente a licença de cópia. Certamente o Google Maps não é um deles (na verdade o Google deixa claro em seus termos que não permite a utilização de informações sem a devida autorização e o OSM não tem essa autorização).
MarvinMep (2016-02-10 16:55:06+00:00): De qualquer forma, é louvável sua ajuda. Procure se basear em fontes oficiais e abertas, como por exemplo, o próprio site da Prefeitura: http://geo.epdvr.com.br/mapavirtual/map.phtml
mweper (2015-11-10 13:28:05+00:00): Hola Alicia. Bienvenida a OSM y gracias por colaborar.
Por favor, no agreges nodos e información duplicada si ya existe un área para la escuela. La información nueva o corregida se tiene que colocar en el área etiquetada como amenity=school.
--
Más info sobre como agregar escuelas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=school
--
Cualquier duda, me puedes contactar. Saludos.
Harald Hartmann (2016-03-12 14:49:39+00:00): Hallo ÖPNV_suedthueringen_oberfranken, wieso wurde der "Halt" in Hüttengrund von Ihnen auf "Bahnhof" hochgestuft? Dazu gibt es auch einen entsprechenden Hinweis (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/467688). Das Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:railway) ist hier eindeutig: Ein Bahnhof MUSS mindestens eine Weiche haben, hier sehe ich aber NUR eine eingleisige Strecke! Viele Grüße, Harald Hartmann
Nakaner (2016-03-12 17:29:41+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz wurde teilweise rückgängig gemacht durch:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35265885
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37787052
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37606739
Alecs01 (2015-11-10 19:07:05+00:00): Grazie e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!
R0bst3r (2015-11-09 20:26:51+00:00): Please stop deleting data! Openstreetmap is a community project. If you think there is something wrong, contact the community. Destroying things others worked hard for, is just vandalism and will be reported and reverted!
R0bst3r (2015-11-09 20:28:31+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=560203#p560203
wambacher (2015-11-09 19:53:23+00:00): still going on?
boy, you'r in trouble.
Osmwithspace (2022-04-13 18:38:58+00:00): Hallo HoloDuke,
folgendem Objekt fehlt ein Tag, das beschreibt, um welche Art von Merkmal es sich handelt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3827230890
Kannst du beschreiben, um was es sich dabei handelt?
Grüße
Osmwithspace
malenki (2015-11-18 08:14:37+00:00): In diesem Changeset hast du die Lenaustraße gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25949716/history

War das Absicht – gibt es sie nicht mehr – oder war das ein Versehen?
malenki (2015-11-18 08:52:14+00:00): Beim genaueren Betrachten des Changesets fällt auf, dass du einige Straßen gelöscht und neu eingezeichnet hast, obwohl du teilweise nur ein Node versetzt hast. Da du JOSM verwendest, dürfte es dir leicht fallen, mit "replace geometry" eine bessere Mappingpraxis zu entwickeln. Das Verbessern von Vorhandenem zeigt auch den Respekt vor den Bearbeitungen deiner Vorgänger.
Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik

Viele Grüße
malenki
FahRadler (2015-11-29 12:24:51+00:00): Hallo malenki,

Volle Absicht.
Wie so viele meiner Taggings.
Die Lenaustraße ist dem Neubau der AWO zum Opfer gefallen, wie auch vieler der früher gemappten Wohnblocks.

Auf welche Straßen die ich gelöscht habe beziehst du dich?
Wie hast du das festgestellt / kann ich das nachvollziehen?
Solche Praxis vermeide ich gewöhnlich, seltene Ausnahmen kann ich begründen.

Schönes RestWE
FahRadler
malenki (2015-11-29 13:06:32+00:00): Hauptsächlich waren mir die "Industriestraße" und "Im Wingert" sowie das Gebäude der Jugendverkehrsschule aufgefallen¹, die hatte ich, als ich diesen Kommentar schrieb, bereits wiederhergestellt. Wenn man die Größe des Changesets in Betracht zieht, ist also nur ein Bruchteil der Änderungen betroffen.
Die gelöschten Wege kannst du hier sehen: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35199523?way_page=19

Weil du die Lenaustraße gelöscht hattest und sie somit aus der Straßenlistenauswertung fiel², habe ich mir in der Folge dieses Changeset angeschaut. Da du alles gut kommentierst, war ich schon davon ausgegangen, dass maximal ein Missgeschick vorlag, aber kein absichtlicher Vandalismus. :)
Ich habe dann lokal das Changeset rückgängig gemacht um zu sehen, was wie bearbeitet worden war. Dabei fielen mir die identischen Geometrien der oben genannten Straßen auf bei deren gleichzeitiger  Neuerstellung.

¹
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25949714/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35834906/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170937273/history
² http://regio-osm.de/listofstreets/evaluationchanges?title=Saarlouis&country=Bundesrepublik%20Deutschland&newer_evaluation=2015-11-10%2014:13:45&older_evaluation=2015-11-09%2014:44:24
FahRadler (2015-11-29 17:12:33+00:00): Hallo maleki,

vielen Dank für deine umfangreiche Antwort.

Der von dir festgestellte Effekt tritt täglich weltweit vieltausendfach auf!
Wenn Ways aufgesplittet werden (so wie in den beiden von dir festgestellten Fällen) behält nur EIN Teil die History, der andere verliert sie.
Das sah für dich so aus als ob ich mit fremden Federn mappe.
Ich hatte zu diese Effekt schon vor 3 Jahren ein Ticket eröffnet - da wurde aber nix gemacht.
Mit der neuesten JOSM-Version ist hierzu ein Feature ergänzt worden, habs aber noch nicht getestet.
Viele Grüße 
FahRadler
malenki (2015-11-29 17:49:08+00:00): Beim Splitten eines Weges behält ein Teil die history, der andere Teil wird in der Folge als neuer Weg mit Version 1 angelegt. Gelöscht wird dabei nichts – im Gegensatz zu den oben verlinkten Wegen. 
Bei "Im Wingert" und an der Verkehrsschule dürfte es auch wenig Anlass zum Splitten geben. Zudem waren – wie gesagt – der gelöschte und der neu angelegte Weg geometrisch identisch.
FahRadler (2015-11-29 19:33:19+00:00): so leid es mir tut - der Effekt kommt vom Splitten.

Industriestraße - hatte vorher einen Ast jenseits der Schillerstraße - den südlichen Teil hatte ich definitiv NICHT gelöscht und wieder eingefügt
Wingert - dort hatte ich nahe der Saarlouiser sTr. einen neuen Node eingefügt, gesplittet und den nördlichen Teil gelöscht (Erstmapper hatte Ulmen-Wingert zusammentreffenlassen). Beweis: node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/418973997 ist noch erhalten von Cyclop
und Verkehrsschule - ja da bin ich SCHULDIG - da hab ich das erste von der Lage unpassende Gebäude gelöscht und ein neues konstruiert (geht halt schneller als 4 Nodes zu verschieben, 4 neue einzufügen und 90°Winkel) - das wäre ein Fall für geo übernehemen - mea culpa
malenki (2015-11-29 19:57:20+00:00): Das nicht gelöschte Node gehört ja auch zu der Querstraße und würde auch das nächste Löschen des Nord-Süd-Stücks überstehen. Aber wie du meinst…
Gppes (2016-07-31 17:41:43+00:00): Hi, josm raunzt beim "Kaltbach" (way 379441201), dass es sich hier um ein auffaellig lange untertunneltes Bacherl handelt (layer = -1). Ist der wirklich unterirdisch, oder ist hier ein kleines Missgeschick passiert? Lg, Gppes
sorcrosc (2015-11-09 21:28:19+00:00): Scusa se rompo ma vedo che ti capita spesso di collegare per sbaglio elementi di diverso tipo con dei nodi in comune, strade, elettrodotti, landuse, ecc...
Fai attenzione! Ciao
woodpeck_repair (2015-11-10 12:32:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35213953 where the changeset comment is: provisional revert of micha4 edits the source of which is currently being questioned; will revert the revert once situation is cleared up.
SomeoneElse (2019-07-13 14:42:11+00:00): Just wondering about http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=379468988 - is the name really "(slow down)"?
Best Regards,
Andy
jpennycook (2019-07-13 14:51:43+00:00): Hello Andy.

It's not the actual name. I'm not sure how that got there. I'll sort it out shortly.

Jon
SomeoneElse (2019-07-13 15:13:34+00:00): Thanks.
lukeandrew (2015-11-09 21:47:33+00:00): Improve road accuracy for trail
TRUEVISIONS (2015-11-10 09:19:09+00:00): Kein Wald auf dem Schützenplatz!!!
Nakaner (2015-11-10 12:49:51+00:00): Hallo new_web,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Bitte beachte, dass bei OSM nicht jeder Baum im Wald steht. Einzelbäume, die keinen geschlossenen Wald bilden, werden als Nodes mit natural=tree (und ggf. weitere Tags für Höhe, Art etc.) getaggt. Für Baumreihen gibt es natural=tree_row (an Ways). Details zu diesen Tags findest du im OSM-Wiki.

Viele Grüße

Michael
lukeandrew (2015-11-09 21:49:04+00:00): Add walking/biking path close to Clear Creek Trail (but not part of it, I think).
wambacher (2015-11-10 09:13:03+00:00): Hi madek

you changed this boundary to maritim (which might be ok) but now there is no administrative al2 boundary any more. and that can't be correct.
see Ecuador or Chile or every other country on the planet.
lukeandrew (2015-11-09 21:50:32+00:00): Improve the trail line (based on GPS).
Jarek 🚲 (2017-06-18 09:52:20+00:00): Hi Derick,

When I mapped that short stretch of Camden Street http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226098091/history as oneway=no in June 2015, it was because, following all signs, it was possible to drive or cycle from Bonny Street to Camden Gardens. There was no left-turn-only sign out of Bonny Street, and the do-not-enter sign in Camden Street facing northbound was placed past the Camden Gardens intersection.

I looked specifically, and I am sure that hadn't changed by November 2015 because I was using that route to cycle to work until April 2016. The short stretch isn't really built for northbound travel (all lane markings are as if it was southbound), and very few travelers do it, but as far as I could tell it was legal - and I was being particular about only taking legal routes.

Has that changed since? 

If it hasn't changed, should we map out what's legal, or what 90% of road users do?
Derick Rethans (2017-06-19 08:41:34+00:00): I don't quite remember why I changed this, but I am pretty sure that coming out of Camden Gardens there is a "Turn Right" on the road, but I guess that doesn't say anything about the coming out of Bonny Street.

But that's all that I can remember. I would generally say that we should map what is legal only.
Jarek 🚲 (2017-06-21 18:54:43+00:00): Thanks. I made a note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1037350 to see if there is anyone in the area who can verify
AndersAndersson (2015-11-10 11:17:38+00:00): Please stop removing values.

There is no need. Fix the renderer if there is a problem with long values.

I can agree that 99% of these values are not that accurate, but some values might be, and then you are reducing accuracy.
Aleks-Berlin (2015-11-10 12:20:14+00:00): Hi Anders,it is not possible today to measure more than 1mm (H-Star) accuray with GPS in Lat+Lon. And Elevation is off by Factor of 10).
Also other methods have are happy with 1mm in best case. Normal GPS is off by about 10 meters in height !
Additionally the surface is not that even.
Even good streets have valleys of 1mm per meter! And natural ground is moving up and down (temperature, humidity, geological) in this range.
So why this sub centimeter precision should be useable?
(in physics we do alot of precision discussions)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Accuracy_of_GPS_data
AndersAndersson (2015-11-10 15:22:58+00:00): Hello, I know that a GPS does not have that kind of accuracy. But I still don't see the point of editing every ele tag in the world. It creates unnecessary database edits and somewhere you're going to remove a value that actually is known to less than a cm. I don't have an example, and I guess it's the same for you. But if everybody removed things they couldn’t imagine to be important in the database, the database would soon be completely empty.

If we are talking science, then you should know that a lot of bad measurements can give a more exact result by using averaging. If we have 10 height measurements from different, GPS, and different days in a place, I think we should be able to nail the height to a lot better than ±10 m.

If you're problem is that the ele tag is "lying", then we should remove every road, since no road is exactly in the place where it is mapped.

I just don’t see the point of your edits. I (and others) will still be adding ele straight from the GPS, and you will spend your time to clean that up, instead of adding something useful that can improve the map.
Aleks-Berlin (2015-11-10 19:25:44+00:00): I did this one evening. And I only did easyly to find ones (e.g. 9x "9" = 999999999).
1. If limiting datasize is no point and increasing readability by computers, why the many wikipedia:de,:en:fr:es:etc have been worldwide changed to wikipedia = en: ?
Having identical keynames, and same value-string for same meaning should also be pushed more.
2. Averaging of 10001 x GPS (delta = 10m) gives 10 cm final accuracy only (if all people carry their GPS in same height and walk the identical way). And even then: each one in sub-mm gives no advantage.
3. We have many values with more than Angstroem (1E-10m), this is below atom size.
4. Obviously wrong ele-tags, like ele=building, ele=10000, ele=-444,
or obviously bad formated strings like 1.20000000000, 1.300000000001, 4.999999999999, 2.3456789E-5
make no sense to keep them.
5. I added hundreds of ways, buildings, etc, and many GPS-traces, so I think it is unfair to say "you should add something to the project".
6. natural=tree, ele=1.23456 means which point of the tree?
7. If it has been hand carried or from inside a metal-car, noone will ever be able to get much better than a full meter.
8. If a road is off by 1m (vs. satelite) it means it is of by 10m in elevation!
AndersAndersson (2015-11-10 21:42:49+00:00): I will answer you by private message. The messages tend to be a bit to long :)
SomeoneElse (2015-11-09 22:20:09+00:00): Thanks for this (and for resolving those notes).
Paul Berry (2015-11-10 09:56:53+00:00): A pleasure.
muralito (2017-08-18 05:09:46+00:00): The bridge has sidewalk in both sides.

You asked to cross walking, dismounted from bicycle?
CRCulver (2017-08-19 12:50:21+00:00): Los de la aduana nos dijieron que está prohibido atravesar el puente en bici o a pie. Se permite sólo en vehículo.
woodpeck_repair (2015-11-09 23:13:56+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 35176341, 35177161, 35162967, 35196054, 35162152, 35196194, 35164174, 35195565, 35196133, 35181874, 35175944, 35175522, 35163035, 35175765, 35171743, 35171670, 35181749, 35195636, 35177598, 35162165, 35171341, 35162946, 35163053, 35173596, 35163645, 35199243, 35181863, 35162575, 35201756, 35177420, 35164218, 35175467, 35201800, 35195698, 35181842, 35195794, 35181757, 35173324, 35181651, 35181808, 35162863, 35161877, 35181639, 35161516, 35171312, 35181773, 35176371, 35181927, 35171475, 35199275, 35181633, 35201725, 35196081, 35195998, 35176689, 35181674, 35195817, 35163218, 35161745, 35176241, 35163185, 35181695, 35161953, 35181597, 35162460, 35162997, 35162274, 35164132, 35173416, 35177277, 35176838, 35181893, 35162155, 35163163, 35162454, 35196111, 35171384, 35181661, 35161454, 35181604, 35195875, 35163022, 35196030, 35176003, 35161793, 35163440, 35171273, 35162756, 35161151, 35173152, 35173687, 35175900, 35175436, 35162409, 35194077, 35181884, 35163106, 35175831, 35176081, 35177475, 35162896, 35181742, 35161559, 35163623, 35181827, 35199153, 35201788, 35163259, 35161775, 35195670, 35194198, 35161816, 35181580, 35194304, 35163574, 35163091, 35162210, 35163064, 35163130, 35173651, 35173465, 35175740, 35176305, 35171535, 35194133, 35181720, 35178396, 35163487, 35201830, 35195917, 35161951, 35181976, 35176573, 35176116, 35163078, 35195968, 35163513, 35201776, 35195844, 35176528, 35162639, 35162659, 35176206, 35175699, 35163196, 35177506, 35175368, 35181713, 35175593, 35181980, 35181683, 35196162, 35162790, 35172912, 35162374, 35171601, 35181728, 35162978, 35162686, 35181788, 35175674, 35181854, 35162702, 35173800, 35173875, 35181620, 35176592, 35163284.
Stalfur (2015-11-10 00:22:35+00:00): That isn't -73 meters for sure
Aleks-Berlin (2015-11-10 00:29:15+00:00): about 300m around this are many strange ele=* !
can you check this?
I dont know this area.
Stalfur (2015-11-10 00:38:10+00:00): I'm tempted to just delete those elevation lines as a bad import. We have access to official elevation data somewhere
SomeoneElse (2015-11-10 01:00:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2831638186 is a Garmin waypoint that's been converted to a node.  You'd need to ask the original author of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22086457 what each symbol meant when they recorded it.  Of the tags only ele is likely to be of any use, and even then only if the Garmin was calibrated before recording (so obviously not in this case since ele=-73 is unlikely!).
ViriatoLusitano (2015-11-10 00:05:37+00:00): Bem-vindo Humberto!
adrianojbr (2016-01-05 21:31:55+00:00): olá, joão batista. tudo bem?

não há necessidade de criar ponto e área para o mesmo ponto comercial. por isso apaguei os pontos.

abraço.
SHARCRASH (2015-11-17 08:49:59+00:00): Hello! There is a role mismatch error report in OSMi ( http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=5.89995&lat=49.46366&zoom=13&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags ) in this MP ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5399161 ) since you've edited it a few days ago. As you know which parts have been edited, can you please check them again and correct please... Thanks!
muralito (2015-11-10 12:33:55+00:00): Hola Juan.

¿que fue lo que quisiste mapear en este punto?
juanlacueva (2015-11-10 16:18:49+00:00): Wingu y ACIJ son 2 ONGs que llevan a cabo www.caminosdelavilla.org. En esta plataforma mapeamos las villas y marcamos puntos de interes. En este caso mapeamos los puntos de arrojo de residuos para que los vecinos puedan reclamar si son o no recogidos y otras deficiencias.
muralito (2015-11-10 17:19:43+00:00): Buenisimo. Te recomiendo que se unan al foro de Argentina, donde pueden mejorar la forma que hacen el mapeo y aprovechar mejor la plataforma. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=49 

Siempre conviene que los elementos tengan un tipo de elemento para que sean utiles en el dato. En este caso creo que podria andar amenity=waste_disposal o algo similar. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal
bryceco (2015-11-10 18:59:16+00:00): Do Starbucks and Greenlake Bar & Grill share this building or is the Starbucks gone (the entire building is tagged Starbucks currently).
GerdP (2015-11-14 21:14:55+00:00): Please review:
What is meant with surface="--" ?
Looks like asphalt or beton.
fabcoop (2015-11-10 07:20:18+00:00): 이름 미정
GerdP (2015-11-11 07:07:57+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=pole is rarely used.
Maybe you want to map a traffic_sign=*  ?
See 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
jleedev (2015-11-12 14:07:47+00:00): This looks really nice.
MCollar (2015-11-12 18:24:07+00:00): Thank you. =]
GerdP (2015-11-11 08:36:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM !
Please review:
I've changed the invalid tag highway=residential;unclassified to highway=residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151021120
This is a problem in the editor program iD version 1.7.4 and should
be solved soon with 1.8.0
Alexey Vazhnov (2025-06-07 12:38:13+00:00): It looks like someone mixed up "building:flats" and "building:levels".

Please see a note https://osm.org/note/4794040
H@mlet (2017-03-18 20:03:28+00:00): Hello,
you mapped a pipeline in a clear cut.
Way #379513905.
However there are power lines (you can see the poles) in this cut.
What makes you think there's also a pipeline ?
Best regards.
Chrysopras (2015-11-10 13:30:28+00:00): That we are allowed to use that name server (unlike some other name servers), is stated and explained in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GEOnet_Names_Server