piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
escallic (2019-11-23 10:33:38+00:00): Hi dekatherm!

I should have time coming up soon to fix a limited number of these buildings by hand.

Ideally, we want to conflate data from street-level photogrammetry as well as from satellite imagery.

To this we should answer: is a building that is outlined by its roof boundary considered incorrectly mapped?

Only aerial or street-level photogrammetry can reveal the facades of a building, so any roof overhang could be represented by a building tag.

But by definition, a building is not a building:roof. So, I would like to tag the overhang of a roof as a connected area, though I have not seen this been done.

Otherwise, it should be sufficient to say by how much the roof overhangs with a building tag, though this may not fit the accepted tagging scheme. Walls, too, should be mapped as well as windows.

Details like this are not only fundamental to OSM as a project but would help define the metrics by which open source tools can find and replace malformed/missing building parts.

We should observe that as time progresses, hand-drawn or pre-existing OSM building data becomes an excellent training set for machine learning because of ground-truths.
Mike Raust (2020-10-02 10:06:31+00:00): Am I right that _no further cleanup_ has happened until now?
escallic (2020-10-21 16:22:18+00:00): http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ZgH
Glassman (2018-09-06 05:20:28+00:00): Campsites should have a tag tourism=camp_site. The name= tag should only contain the name of the campsite, not personal information. Can you fix your edit? I'll send you a message with some helpful info to get you started. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62328981
mavl (2019-07-21 10:16:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
RoundCircle (2018-09-06 04:20:40+00:00): Comment should be "Australia maritime boundaries import - territorial waters, Coral Sea Islands."
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Rich1234 (2018-09-06 10:41:20+00:00): Hello, thanks for helping to add data to openstreetmap.

Based upon the Bing streetside images of this location, you should have further typed this new service road as subtype "service=driveway" because based on those images, it fits the definition of a driveway from the wiki (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway).
sahanki (2019-07-03 10:04:59+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit. We apologize for the delayed response. The road segment that was drawn here was based on aerial image and in case of any ambiguity we just add service road so that other osm community user/local user will change that to driveway based on their knowledge. 

Thanks for making changes to the edit. Please do let us know if there are any other suggestions.

Regards,
sahanki
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
RoundCircle (2018-09-06 04:21:21+00:00): Comment should be "Australia maritime boundaries import - territorial waters, NSW/Norfolk Island."
mavl (2019-07-21 10:30:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
tyr_asd (2021-05-03 09:59:12+00:00): FYI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2152437
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:31:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Mishari (2018-12-08 02:14:14+00:00): Several problems with this, #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis

Please remove this and the connecting service road that you've added. This area is now a construction site. Secondary, it's irresponsible to add a service road without identifying what kind of access is allowed through it. Would you appreciate it if your GPS tried to route you through a restricted or private area?
Mishari (2018-12-08 02:16:42+00:00): FYI I'm referring to

way 623281660
way 623281690
way 623281658
way 623281656
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:32:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
santamariense (2018-09-06 13:19:27+00:00): Todas as estradas que levam da via pública à áreas privadas/coletivas como a casas, sede de fazendas, locais de interesse público que são visitados com frequência por carros de passeio, etc podem ser marcadas com highway=service ao invés de highway=track. Track geralmente é a estrada que adentra lavouras, campos e etc, e que não se encaixam nas situações acima. E também, tracks não são roteáveis.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62330136
shaikh solaiman (2019-08-20 10:24:03+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contribution on OSM! in this area you have tagged single nodes as building:levels=1. Is it true or false?
If false, please remove these tag immediately. Keep mapping.
WingardiumMapiosa (2019-08-20 16:25:30+00:00): Hello, saye__Krun is no longer on the team so I’ll pick up this communication on the changeset. Thank you for reaching out, I took a look at this issue and say_Krun was not responsible for adding building:level=1 tags to the building nodes. This was done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69554925 which you’ve already commented on. Happy mapping!
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Frans S (2018-09-14 12:26:11+00:00): Hi Tushar.Just a request from a validator.
Please square your buildings after mapping. You hardly squared your buildings (22 out of 23 not squared)
another point. Read the instructions how to tag buildings. request is Building=yes
mavl (2019-07-21 10:33:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Omnific (2018-09-06 16:09:29+00:00): Please elaborate. What you deleted was an apartment complex that has been around for many years, not a hotel. Is it being replaced by a new hotel that's currently under construction?
BaadalDhingra (2018-09-09 05:28:27+00:00): I made a mistake. I reckon the apartment complex was still there. The apartment building complex and the building under construction are on opposite sides of South 188th Street.
BaadalDhingra (2019-06-28 03:22:40+00:00): I do not think that it is being replaced by a new hotel under construction.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:14:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:34:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
opendcc (2018-09-07 13:25:37+00:00): This changeset was reverted with changeset 62375845.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:35:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:36:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:36:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:36:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:36:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:36:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:36:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:36:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:36:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:41:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:41:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:41:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:41:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:59:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/361051
mavl (2019-07-21 10:59:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
user_18305684 (2023-07-02 14:48:41+00:00): Hi,

what is the meaning of the tag "stone=run" on several nodes (example node 5886963093) ?

Best regards
user_18305684 (2023-07-02 15:11:29+00:00): I can see no stone on or close the street_lamp :
https://www.google.fr/maps/@54.1429441,15.2847035,3a,90y,113.8h,93.18t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLKEyqIJh35CSt_wUHj7Z6g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

(except the highway of course, see way 23614737)
taxi301 (2023-07-04 07:58:49+00:00): I'm surprised because I added it but where it came from I have no idea, I deleted it
Baloo Uriza (2018-09-07 01:48:24+00:00): This is nowhere near how you tag addresses, payment information or hours of operation.  Go back and read the wiki or stop creating bad edits across multiple accounts.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62331937
alester (2018-09-06 22:12:44+00:00): The timing of these edits wasn't the greatest, because a construction project that will be physically dividing a section of the highway should be complete within the next month. Also, please don't create fictional turn restrictions. I'll leave most of the edits from this changeset intact because they do reflect the current reality (even if it's only for a few more weeks), but I'll be removing the fictional turn restrictions when I get home tonight.
oliviap_telenav (2018-09-07 10:24:35+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for you comment.
atcomapper (2018-09-06 13:03:01+00:00): Jeg havde egentlig ændret til tertiary her da der først er skiltet med motortrafikvej nede i svinget, ikke helt oppe ved Tømmervej: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/t3kDyJ-_OeRZVZs4ZWmk4A

Modsat tilkørslen på den anden side, hvor der er skiltet med motortrafikvej helt oppe ved Kirkebakken: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/PK_pfuyFhUVjh5IYsZpT0Q

Ikke at det gør den helt store forskel, men jeg mener stadig at det er teknisk mere rigtigt at ddet lille stykke her ikke er tagget som motortrafikvej.
DK7080BE (2018-09-06 16:58:59+00:00): Det er vel af praktiske grunde at man placerer skiltet et stykke inde. Dette vejstykke er jo ret kort.
Ude ved Tømmervej er der bl.a. et skilt for cyklister med pil der viser hvad vej de skal køre.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.645432267836014&lng=9.660107523418977&z=17&pKey=bsf4P6nF8UuAKPlUenM9IQ&focus=photo&x=0.4824837677983638&y=0.5948888403943251&zoom=0
DK7080BE (2018-09-06 17:23:52+00:00): Meget værre er det at man på Tømmervej ned mod Industrivej har placeret byzoneskiltet i den forkerte side af vejen; på venstre side i stedet for højre. Skiltet på venstre side kan jo være usynlig pga. modkørende trafik:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.64272336694785&lng=9.665510524466981&z=17&pKey=YBHJ5TwgqIqryDb_7ambZg&focus=photo
eggie (2018-09-06 10:01:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-09-06 10:08:20+00:00): Je bedoeling zal ongetwijfeld goed zijn, maar door de aanleg van de rotonde zijn de busroutes onderbroken. ook heeft het fietspad met ook een fietsrouterelatie geen verbinding met de kruisende weg. Ik kijk straks of ik wat kan repareren, want dit is geen beginners werk.
eggie (2018-09-06 10:37:18+00:00): De rotonde ligt nu goed volgens de BGT omtrek gericht. oneway=yes verwijderd. bicycle use_sidepath toegevoegd. 
Het fietspad goedgelegd aangesloten op de zijweg. Heeft die een naam? 
De busroutes moet nog even gebeuren. Dat kost meer tijd.
Graag reactie...
eggie (2018-09-06 11:02:52+00:00): Wat er aan busrourelaties stond heb ik op de rotonde gezet. De rotonde gesplitst in twee delen. Volgens mij staat er het e.e.a. dubbel op de aanvoerwegen.
SproutScout (2018-09-06 11:24:02+00:00): Hoi Eggie, dank je wel voor het bekijken en aanpassen van mijn wijzigingen (en de DM). Ik kwam er inderdaad niet uit met de busroutes. Ik zal vanavond even de tekening opzoeken die ik heb van de rotonde voor de benaming van de zijweg.
eggie (2018-09-06 11:44:57+00:00): Mooi.. Dan kun je het zelf aanpassen. 
In editor JOSM kun je de BGT omtrekgericht als achtergrond gebruiken.
Via het forum kun je lezen hoe dat moet.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

 en

BGT: BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021
SproutScout (2018-09-07 11:59:03+00:00): Op tekening staat geen straatbenaming genoemd tussen de rotonde van de stromenweg en de Jan Campertstraat. Tevens staat deze niet in BGT. Benaming van de Jan Campertstraat doortrekken? (de straat rechts vanaf de aftakkende straat dient de "Etty Hillesumstraat" te zijn voor de rest van de lengte volgens BGT.)
eggie (2018-09-07 14:27:45+00:00): Voor de juiste straatnamen kijk ik meestal welke adressen het Kadaster heeft toegekend op de adresnodes. Zonder gebouwen wordt het lastig. Wanneer de straat (nog) geen naam heeft kun je een note=   toevoegen. Bv straat naam nog onbekend. Wanneer een straatnaam verkeerd staat gewoon aanpassen. Het straatnaambord is leidend.
gabro00 (2018-09-26 21:48:45+00:00): A user named OpenTopoMap reverted your revert in 62924532. Now there are big holes in the Hungarian Alföld. See it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3061523/history#map=14/46.2588/20.2564
eggie (2018-09-06 10:11:01+00:00): Voor het vinden van het juiste adres kun je het beste de straatnaam toevoegen.
SproutScout (2018-09-07 12:06:45+00:00): Zal straatnamen toevoegen aan toegangswegen
eggie (2018-09-06 10:13:55+00:00): Wellicht de straatnaam erbij. Normaliter worden gebouwen geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. kennelijk is  dat hier niet gebeurd. Aanvragen gaat via het forum van openstreetmap in het draadje verzoek BAG import. Tip: Neus ook een rond op het forum.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2018-11-14 03:55:33+00:00): 1. Which part of "Keep Straight Way Straight" that you don't understand?

<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_straight_ways_straight>

Your editor (JOSM) is perfectly capable of maintaining straight road as repeatedly observed on-ground by me and other /surveying contributors/, yet you don't do it.

It is not an isolated incident that I caught Grab-employed armchair mappers doing this. I now seriously doubt that your team actually read the documentation before "contributing" to OSM.

2. Why exactly you replace existing `building=commercial` tag on Thanapoom Tower with a nonfunctional `amenity=commercial`?

This is nonsense, and is a *lousy* handling of other contributor's hard work.

Again, it not an isolated incident either; I have caught Grab-employed armchair mapper changing whole temple into a road just few weeks before.

-----

These carelessness are now reverted in changeset 64465129 and 64465551:

- <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64465129>
- <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64465551>