piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-03 17:20:01+00:00): Dann musst du die Tage separat aufführen. Also alle Tage, für die Zeitspannen (=mehrere "Time Spans") identisch sind, müssen zusammen in einer "Opening Hours" sein.

So muss man das auch bei StreetComplete machen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:StreetComplete_opening_hours_form.png
Würde auf dem Bild Mo-Fr 09:00-13:00 und dann noch mal Mo,Fr 14:00-18:00, dann würde die auch die Vormittagszeiten überschreiben.

Leider sind Öffnungszeiten ein komplexes Thema.
5R-MFT (2021-09-03 17:54:23+00:00): Ich hoffe jetzt passt es.  Im vorbeigehen werde ich solche Öffnungszeiten nicht mehr eintragen.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-03 18:32:30+00:00): Hey 5R-MFT, danke fürs Korrigieren. Uff, ich hoffe, ich habe dich nicht abgeschreckt :-/ Wollte nur weiterhelfen. Wenn ich nicht viel Zeit habe, mache ich gelegentlich Bilder und trags dann zu Hause ein.

Liebe Grüße
Ze0zohk1
mavl (2019-07-21 13:36:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-02-22 15:36:46+00:00): Dag Olaf.. het overgebleven stuk Westelijke Havendijk  zal niet routeren, want je hebt access=no getagd. Klopt dit wel?
MVG,
Eggie
OlafJenniskens (2019-02-22 17:05:25+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Klopt, deze weg is momenteel nog wel aanwezig maar is afgesloten voor al het verkeer. Momenteel word er aan de weg/ kade gewerkt.
Mvg,
Olaf
eggie (2019-02-22 17:47:42+00:00): Oke duidelijk, maar niet voor andere mappers.
Normaliter zet je een weg dan op highway=construction met de extra tag construction=unclassified  (ligt eraan wat de originele tag was) 
Dit in het geval als de weg overhoop ligt voor langere tijd. 
Wordt er maar kort gewerkt dan zetten we de weg niet op slot. 
Wellicht nog even kijken?
Bedankt voor je reactie..
MVG,
Eggie
OlafJenniskens (2019-02-22 18:00:46+00:00): Ah duidelijk. Ik heb hem meteen aangepast. Naar verwachting zal de weg over een jaar ook echt verdwijnen. Of er een nieuwe voor in de plaats komt is nog niet duidelijk. 
Dank voor je hulp :)
Mvg, 
Olaf
Hjart (2019-02-22 12:53:31+00:00): Her fik du rodet Møllebækvej 3 over i Bollegade 63. Bare så du lige en anden er opmærksom på at det kan ske.
Hjart (2019-02-22 12:59:10+00:00): Vær også opmærksom på at SDFE Skærmkort ikke nødvendigvis er helt up-to-date ;-)  (det kan indimellem godt betale sig at checke med luftfotos inden upload)
Glassman (2019-02-22 15:13:00+00:00): I removed the lanes=0 which would imply that it's not a street.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67465448
Glassman (2019-02-22 15:12:11+00:00): Tip: We use full spellings of street names. Software has a hard time unabbreviating names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67465489
JeroenHoek (2019-02-22 22:25:42+00:00): In de Nederlandse delen van OpenStreetMap importeren we de outlines van gebouwen bijna altijd uit de BAG. Ik zie dat de wijziging die je deed ook in de BAG al staat. In zo'n geval kun je beter even op het Nederlandse deel van het OpenStreetMap-forum om een herimport van de BAG-outline vragen; zo blijven ze gelijk.

Zo'n importaanvraag doe je zo (ik heb deze al even aangevraagd):

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=739472#p739472

Mocht een pand-outline niet kloppen, dan kun je altijd even kijken hoe hij in de 
BAG staat:

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=181213.20226187&geometry.y=580842.76993309&zoomlevel=7&objectId=0080100000339573&detailsObjectId=0080010000412910

Daar kun je eventueel ook een terugmelding doen aan de gemeente.
askb (2020-01-14 03:18:37+00:00): Some of the street names added here had typos and some are missing.  There are fixed in changeset #: 79540508 please review if you have a moment.
Jrachi (2020-12-01 09:20:13+00:00): Ciao.
Hai inserito una relazione per ref:REI=EVBAF220000
Ma esiste già una relazione che è concorde con i dati a catasto regionale.
Hai inoltre inserito due sentieri con ref=F22 che non sono parte né della tua relazione o di quella corretta.
Ti ricordo anche che il tag ref si applica solo sulla relazione e non si mette sui tratti che la compongono.
Jrachi (2020-12-14 21:21:31+00:00): Tolgo dalla relazioni i tag REI
Se hai dei dati dei riferimento giusti la puoi correggere...
user_5359 (2019-03-28 14:19:38+00:00): I have reverted this change set (for details please have a look on the comment to the following changesets of this account)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 13:49:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6295695970/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
DressyPear4 (2019-02-22 16:44:06+00:00): Olá fernando, nomes genéricos como "canteiro" ou "área verde" não devem ser adicionados ao mapa, é para isso que servem as tag's.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67466969
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-22 22:03:07+00:00): Looks good! Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OSM :)
PT-53 (2019-02-23 07:35:12+00:00): Änderungssatz-Kommentar?
PT-53 (2019-02-23 07:34:32+00:00): Änderungssatz-Kommentar?
PT-53 (2019-02-23 07:33:53+00:00): Änderungssatz-Kommentar?
user_3022894 (2019-03-23 12:41:51+00:00): Hi Erasor84,
die Garagen des Garagenhofes kannst du ruhig zusätzlich als Garagen mappen bzw. als Garagen-Gebäude belassen. Dazu zeichnest du einfach eine weitere Fläche im Bereich der Garagen (nur Garagen, nicht der Hof) und kennzeichnest sie mit building=garages. Deinen Garagenhof kannst du natürlich zusätzlich verwenden, nur eben bitte keine bestehenden Garagen löschen.
Viele Grüße,
Lukas
aceman444 (2020-06-05 05:56:50+00:00): Zdravim, preco tieto zmeny? Cyklotrasy a pesi trasy znacky 'from' a 'to' nepouzivaju, a na Slovensku zda sa vacsinou ano "name". Dokonca ste zmenili zaciatocny bod z Partizanska luka na Vojenska nemocnica, podla coho? Zase neuvadzate ziadny zdroj, Freemap.sk Cyklo to urcite nie je.
Leo Slager (2019-02-23 15:46:06+00:00): Dag Sitethief.
Je vraagt een review:
Het toevoegen van oneway=no is in OSM niet gebruikelijk. Als je dat toch wilt doen, kun je nog een paar miljoen wegen daarvan voorzien.
Het voegt ook niets toe omdat alle wegen standaard voor tweerichtingsverkeer geschikt zijn. Dat is de default.
We taggen dus alleen de uitzonderingen met oneway=yes. In uitzonderingsgevallen, waar andere mappers wellicht aan een fout zouden kunnen denken, of een twee richting fietspad aan één zijde van de weg gebruiken we wel oneway=no
Sitethief (2019-02-26 10:12:39+00:00): Hey Leo

Bedankt voor je review! Lijkt me duidelijk en ik ben het er eigenlijk wel mee eens! Ik zal dit onthouden voor de volgende keer als ik met deze straten bezig ben!

Nogmaals bedankt!
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-26 20:25:37+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1792257 ?
s8evq (2019-06-19 09:27:36+00:00): Dag Peter, ik zie dat je enkele place=hamlet nodes toegevoegd heb. Ik beweer niet dat ze fout zijn, maar ik herken de namen gewoon niet. Wat is de bron van deze gegevens?
Peter Velle (2019-06-19 09:39:24+00:00): Hallo, Een mix van o.a. Ferrariskaart, stafkaart, het standaardwerk Toponymie van Oudenburg van onze Oudenburgse  taalkundige Maurits Gysseling, en  gebruik bij een weliswaar iets ouder publiek :-). Jammer dat dat stilaan verdwijnt allemaal...
s8evq (2019-06-19 13:01:58+00:00): OK, bedankt voor de edits. Dit is waardevol.
jmapb (2019-02-22 19:45:55+00:00): The opening hours format is perfect. A few unrelated notes:

 - The Erv's node is outside the building's footprint. Not your fault, I know, it was like that when you found it. But if Erv's is inside the building, and I think it is, the node should be moved inside the footprint.

- There's no need to fill in the city, state, and country parts of the address -- they'll be deduced from the node's location and zip code. It's not wrong to add them, but it saves time and database space to skip them. (Address tagging styles vary across the globe, but best I can tell this is the local standard -- except in Queens, where the addresses use neighborhood names for the city, so we tend to add those as the city name.)

 - The original intent of the "brewery" tag was to indicate what brewer a particular bar or pub is associated with -- this is very common in Europe, but much less so here. Some people use this tag to list brands of draft beer available, some use brewery=yes to indicate that there's a brewery onsite, like you did. Personally I think it's better to omit it in 99.9% of the bars in NYC.

In the wiki documentation the suggested tags for an onsite brewery are microbrewery=yes (for a brewpub/microbrewery) or craft=brewery (for a larger scale brewing operation, but not large enough to be tagged industrial=brewery). See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brewery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brewery

Erv's looks like a nice place... gotta get over there sometime!
jmapb (2019-02-22 19:48:27+00:00): (Oh drat.. I just saw there's a missing 0 in the opening hours format. It should be "Mo-Su 08:00-02:00" not "Mo-Su 08:00-2:00".. sorry!)
Enukt (2019-02-22 19:51:54+00:00): Super helpful. Thanks!

Follow-up question: Erv's is both a bar and a coffee shop. Any way to tag it as both, rather than just a bar?
jmapb (2019-02-22 22:45:15+00:00): You have to choose between bar and cafe, unless it really actually is two different businesses operating out the same premises. If it looks and feels more like a bar, call it a bar. But there's no reason a bar can't serve coffee, and no reason a cafe can't serve booze.

You can indicate that coffee-shop-style food (pastries and the like) is available by tagging "cuisine=coffee_shop".

You can indicate that coffee is available by tagging "drink:coffee=yes" (and "drink:espresso=yes" for espresso and espresso-based drinks.) Other common drink tags are drink:tea, drink:wine, drink:liquor, and drink:beer.

And you can always add a "description" tag for any information that doesn't fit in the standard tagging schemes. It's a freeform text field. In this case you might add something like "description=cocktail bar with coffee shop service in the mornings", or something like that.
Enukt (2019-02-23 01:11:13+00:00): Nice. Thanks for all the explanations.
pitscheplatsch (2019-02-23 08:57:55+00:00): Hi JacquesLG, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason, behind deleting several mapped objects, which are still visible the used sattelitte imagery? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67469035
JacquesLG (2019-03-01 10:31:17+00:00): The satellite image is outdated
abakus_uploader (2019-02-22 23:31:00+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gabro00 (2019-02-22 15:44:54+00:00): The edit is wrong, the name is already there. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420341452
gabro00 (2019-02-22 15:54:44+00:00): Stop these edits! The cyclepaths already on the map. The proper way is by adding cycleway=lane to main highways, which is already done.
gabro00 (2019-02-22 15:56:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
Gino-52 (2019-02-23 11:03:55+00:00): Mal ne Frage:
Das Verkehrszeichentool sagt
motor_vehicle=agricultur
Ich lass mich ja gern belehren.
Wiso änderst Du das auf
motor_vehicle=no
agricultur=yes
Gruß
GiNo
Prince Kassad (2019-02-23 11:52:47+00:00): Hallo, mir ist jetzt erst das traffic_sign= aufgefallen. Die Beschilderung hat sich vor Ort geändert. Dort steht jetzt "Verbot für Kraftfahrzeuge" (260) und drunter "Traktoren frei" (1024-17). Das heißt, traffic_sign= müsste an die neue Situation angepasst werden. Dann müsste auch das Verkehrszeichentoll das richtige Ergebnis ausgeben.
4004 (2019-02-22 23:04:33+00:00): здравствуйте,
не уверен, что вы правильно поняли смысл точек тупик - это не там, где машина дальше не поедет, их не надо ставить на окончания каждого дворового проезда. это для случаев, где глухая стена, и не пройти никак.
Andrey Soika (2019-02-25 07:19:57+00:00): Здравствуйте,
Возможно, я прочитал на вики и не верно понял. 
Можете, пожалуйста, пояснить тогда как лучше обозначать тупиковые дороги, как парковки, и для чего используется no-exit?
Заранее благодарю.
4004 (2019-02-25 23:28:38+00:00): Ну, проект то свободный и каждый волен трактовать вики как считает нужным и верным. Мой комментарий - лишь мое мнение, другие можете услышать а телеграмм чате или на форуме. 
Стоит понять, что вы имеете в виду под тупиковыми дорогами - если тупиковые для авто (дальше только тротуар/бордюр/поле), то достаточно оборвать линию дороги и никакой прокладчик маршрут дальше не поведёт. Если дорога тупиковая вообще (стена/обрыв/забор), то там уже можно ставить noexit. При этом просто оборвать линию дороги тоже было бы достаточно в большинстве случаев, но noexit был придуман ещё и чтобы валидаторы не ругались на несоединненные дороги рядом друг с другом, когда на самом деле с одной дороги на другую не пройти. 
Парковки обозначаются amenity=parking либо parking:lane:right/left (стороне дороги) для парковок вдоль дорог (там довольно сложная схема но хорошо иллюстрирована в вики). Если в этом ваш вопрос?
Andrey Soika (2019-02-26 10:38:41+00:00): Спасибо
mavl (2019-12-05 22:05:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
ForstEK (2019-05-20 12:27:41+00:00): Hi, scottyc! Please be careful in typing, you type "man_made=pipieline", i corrected it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70438773
Bernard59118 (2019-02-23 11:46:36+00:00): j'ai créé une relation site pour le CETI
mavl (2019-02-23 14:29:58+00:00): Hello Moh1371 and welcome to OpenStreetMap.  
  
You used MAPS.ME programme for editing a map recently. And you added nonexistent shop to the map. Your action was cancelled.  
  
Please, use the bookmarks for personal notes in MAPS.ME. The bookmarks are stored on your device only. MAPS.ME does not send the bookmarks to OpenStreetMap.
saintam1 (2019-02-23 07:04:20+00:00): Hello, and welcome to Sofia!

Why did you disconnect the landuse from the road? That's the way it's done throughout the city in Sofia. Personally I don't feel strongly either way, but consistency is probably important.

Just curious what your thoughts on this are.

Happy mapping :)
vorpalblade-kaart (2019-02-25 17:07:44+00:00): Saintam1, 
Thank you for connecting about this. I have come across several areas where the landuse was connected to the road and chose to disconnect it to provide more clarity. 

I disconnected it from the highways since it seems ambiguous and incorrect to state in a changeset comment that  `I added a traffic_signal to a highway` on a landuse.

For example, let's say I added a surface to a road along with a maxspeed sign with the comment `I added a surface and a maxspeed to a road`. If an inexperienced mapper were to see that comment on a landuse, they might think that I added the surface to the landuse or I was unintentionally modifying a landuse when I shouldn't be.

I know that in JOSM, when you add a node to a highway by clicking on it, it will often connect two ways that are either on top of one another or very close together (dependent upon zoom level), so I figured a better long-term solution to (hopefully) avoid having non-related edits on a landuse would be to remove the landuse from the highways. Ideally, I would have also improved the accuracy of the landuse, but the imagery that Bing and the others provide aren't (currently) good enough to make it easy, unless I missed one that does have fairly detailed imagery.

I probably won't be disconnecting landuses from ways in the future though, since I added a validator test to make certain that I don't accidentally modify landuses. See https://github.com/KaartGroup/KaartValidator/blob/master/kaart.validator.mapcss#L641 for the test and https://github.com/KaartGroup/KaartValidator/commit/2e9e1a0ecac683cff038a9feef8069d05ebc9af6#diff-5ad36fba4276fd0c3284257bb267515dR641 for the actual commit. I'm probably going to extend the test for other boundaries, which is why it is `node:new < *[/landuse/]:modified` instead of `node:new < *[landuse]:modified`.

Our team welcomes the feedback that you have provided and appreciate your willingness to work with us to improve the map in Sofia! These types of conversations allow us to help improve our processes for future editing. If you have any other comments specific to editing in Bulgaria please let me know so that I can modify our validator too. 

Thank you for the feedback. I look forward to continuing to work with you.
saintam1 (2019-02-25 21:58:09+00:00): Hello!

Yes I agree it does tie two unrelated things together. I'm not precious about which way is better, but I figure let's keep it the way it's done in other parts of the city.

That validator code is really neat. Well done to you and your team for writing down those checks.

I'll let you know if there's anything I see that should be discussed, but so far you guys are doing great work!
vorpalblade-kaart (2019-02-26 14:31:04+00:00): Thanks.

I hope the greater OSM community will find the checks from our validator code helpful in the future.
Hjart (2019-02-22 20:22:14+00:00): Jesper Pedersen er vel ikke en bank?
Naturbeundrer (2019-02-24 00:07:14+00:00): Hej Hjalte.
Jesper Pedersen er ikke en bank, men Jesper Pedersen er mit navn. 
Nordea hæveautomat er beliggende på Bredgade 35, 7480 Vildbjerg (samme adresse, som SuperBrugsen.
Hilsen Jesper
Naturbeundrer (2019-02-24 00:10:38+00:00): Hej Hjart.
Undskyld for jeg kaldte dig Hjalte.
Hilsen Jesper
Hjart (2019-02-24 06:38:30+00:00): Helt i orden. Jeg tager ikke en lille stavefejl så tungt. 
Automaten er markeret foran Brugsen. Jeg ville bare gøre opmærksom på at det vel er Nordea der bestyrer den.
Naturbeundrer (2019-02-24 08:10:42+00:00): Ja du har ret i at det er Nordea der bestyrer hæveautomaten.
Naturbeundrer (2019-02-24 08:20:48+00:00): Hej Hjart.
Tak for du har market automaten således:
Amenity: ATM.
Operator: Nordea.
Hilsen Jesper
aceman444 (2019-02-22 23:24:25+00:00): Zdravim, co je to 'a' na konci nazvu? A preto sa znacka 'name' lisi od 'name:sk' ? Ktor nazov je spravny?
filip777 (2019-02-24 21:06:04+00:00): Ahoj, to som sa pomýlil počas toho ako som to písal v smartphone - v oboch rečiach má byť "Hollerung káva & koloniál"
aceman444 (2019-02-24 21:34:22+00:00): Dakujem a co tam predavaju? Je to kaviaren alebo aj obchod s niecim?
filip777 (2019-02-27 17:47:51+00:00): Je to aj kaviareň a na stene je polica s biopotravinami (preto asi ten "koloniál" v názve). Ospravedlňujem sa za menšiu odmlku. Budem postupne pridávať POIky v celej Modre, takže prijímam pripomienky
aceman444 (2019-03-02 16:59:31+00:00): Dobre, dakujem. Ale ak vas mozem poprosit tak ak musite pouzivat Maps.me, tak si to potom este skontrolujte v inom editore (napr. JOSM), lebo maps.me vytvara dost chybne znacky (ako napr. toto) a urcite nema ani tolko moznosti zadat spravny typ objektu.
filip777 (2019-03-03 16:12:11+00:00): OK
ftcat (2019-03-04 10:05:56+00:00): You are adding links between carriageways that do not exist along Los Angeles Boulavard
CartonewsSVK (2019-03-04 23:08:37+00:00): Hi ftcat, thanks for letting me know that these connections don’t exist. I won’t add these anymore.
ftcat (2019-04-09 07:23:34+00:00): Just a warning to remote mappers, in Zambia we drive on the left, this is important when drawing the direction of oneway ways. Service way 672350395 has been drawn in the wrong direction. I have corrected it but I also suspect it is not a oneway by looking at the imagery.
Siguatepeque (2019-04-10 10:03:50+00:00): Hi ftcat, Thanks for correcting the direction. I will keep that in mind while I map.
viloan (2019-02-22 17:09:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:57+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 66867721, 66867849, 66867963, 66868015, 66868076, 66868132, 66868309, 66868368, 66868431, 66868474, 66868507, 66868610, 66868655, 66868703, 66868780, 66879914, 67348929, 67349145, 67349310, 67350378, 67351210, 67351943, 67352120, 67352383, 67352533, 67352604, 67352793, 67352885, 67353516, 67354053, 67354451, 67354657, 67354939, 67355271, 67355834, 67355972, 67357442, 67357672, 67358181, 67358543, 67358835, 67371091, 67371141, 67371432, 67371774, 67372020, 67372143, 67388459, 67388607, 67391006, 67391359, 67391383, 67391487, 67391773, 67391857, 67392386, 67392649, 67392898, 67393046, 67393168, 67393460, 67393653, 67393789, 67393836, 67394029, 67394290, 67396156, 67396370, 67397205, 67397466, 67398021, 67399077, 67399794, 67408927, 67409115, 67409334, 67409512, 67409574, 67409759, 67409867, 67410052, 67410257, 67410654, 67410768, 67410995, 67411059. Reason: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
السوق الالكتروني (2019-02-22 23:52:32+00:00): 😀
tarquaeron (2019-02-23 05:10:25+00:00): This is the true location. The other location is the fortis escorts hospital. I don’t know how or can’t delete the old entry for the Treebo the anchorage hotel.
Hjart (2019-02-23 08:09:34+00:00): You can't delete via Maps.me. If you want to delete something you'll need to go https://www.openstreetmap.org
tarquaeron (2019-02-28 09:03:13+00:00): Oh ok thanks ! I went to openstreetmap.org, but couldn't find the wrong location, on top of the hospital anymore. When i go to the maps.me app it's still there. Did you already delete it and maps.me hasn't released an updated map yet?
Hjart (2019-02-28 11:50:15+00:00): In addition to those in OSM, Maps.me shows their own database of hotels etc. The one in the wrong location might be one of those. If that's the case it's useless to try to remove it here.