piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToniE (2020-08-17 13:14:06+00:00): oh ja, auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89484128?node_page=3#map=20/48.30606/11.90843&layers=TN

noch sichtbar und wohl für 501, 520, 550 und 560 relevant.

Die bekommen wir über die GTFS-Daten wieder an die richtige Position ...

Aber wenn ich so recherchiere: die Haltestelle gibt es beim MVV garnicht mehr, weder im Online-Fahrplan, noch in den aktuellen oder älteren GTFS.
miche101 (2020-08-17 13:18:55+00:00): Ja die Baustelle ist schon länger.. aber ich kann mir nicht vorstellen dass sie nicht mehr kommt. Da nehmen sich die Baustellen die Hand :-/
ToniE (2020-08-17 13:23:35+00:00): Bzgl. GTFS-Daten und aktuelle und ältere:

'skyper' hatte den Vorschlag gemacht, die GTFS-Daten zum Fahrplanwechsel (Mitte Dezember) aufzubewahren und als 'long-term' und auch mit Datum zugänglich zu machen (DE-BY-MVV-long-term als symbolischen Link auf DE-BY-MVV-2020-12-13)
Wegeschlenzer (2020-08-17 14:10:48+00:00): Auweia, da hab ich ja einen Bock geschossen... Also Straßenzüge nie löschen, sondern umbenennen bzw. anders kategorisieren.

Zu den Bushaltestellen weiß ich, dass die zwar wieder im Bereich des Rathauses angeordnet werden, aber versetzt. Und die Stadt diskutiert eine Überarbeitung/Ergänzung der Linien...
Also von daher vielleicht schon besser bis zum Fahrplanwechsel im Dez. warten.
BeKri (2020-08-18 05:35:10+00:00): Siehe auch schon
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89405035
aber bei manchen hilft nix ...
evod (2020-08-17 15:45:17+00:00): verflixt, das war schnell, die wollt ich gerade eintragen :D
Frans S (2020-08-17 09:08:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are rahter fine and accurate. 
Please square all rectangular buildings
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89484327
ubuntu_guy (2020-08-17 21:21:11+00:00): Thank you for your valuable feedback. I have had a few blocks invalidated but nobody has ever bothered to tell me why. That has always frustrated me.
Frans S (2020-08-17 09:00:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors.
just a small remark. You mapped a few courtyard as  buildings. Please keep an eye on shadows 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89484570
DaveF (2020-09-30 17:50:18+00:00): Hi
What are these two objects? 
They're outside the boundary fence, Mk1 is stacked elsewhere & they don't appear on the latest images.
scorfman (2020-10-01 15:04:56+00:00): The description as MK1 was a copy/paste error. That has been corrected. Also, the positioning was done via a ground level view. I've repositioned them based on aerial photography from 9/24. Thanks for bringing this to my attention!
aceman444 (2020-12-26 23:59:31+00:00): Hi, you can't put random remarks into the 'name' tag of an object, . Only official proper names of the object belong there. You already expressed that it is a dangerous area using military=danger_area. I don't know if that marking is correct, whether the zone still belongs to the military.
Also it would be better to draw the mines zone as an area, not simple points.

Anyway, landmines danger can be expressed using hazard=minefield, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hazard , which I will now add. Thanks for marking the land mine zones.
Frans S (2020-08-17 08:53:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fair, but fail accuratecy. You often map just a rectangular despite the form is more complicated.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89484757
Frans S (2020-08-22 10:33:40+00:00): Hi. On this page you can see what corrections has been made>
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=89776591#19/17.98820/-76.81897
Best regards
Frans S (2020-08-17 08:50:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please follow the outlines of buildings more accurate. Just a rectangular form is not enough.
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89484806
Martin Borsje (2020-08-17 04:53:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2020-08-17 04:55:40+00:00): Ik zie dat je oostelijk de weg op private hebt gezet; dat is goed. westelijk heb je er no_access op gezet; dit zou ik op private zett. no_access is voor "echt verboden" (militair etc.) Doe je het zelf?
Carto'Cité (2020-09-09 14:55:43+00:00): Bonjour Michel,
J'ai passé quelques highway=footway en highway=path car il ne semble pas s'agir de footway au sens strict (trottoir ou panneau dédié piéton) et ils n'étaient plus utilisable pour les cyclistes car par défaut les footway ne le sont pas. N'hésite pas si tu as des précisions sur ce parc (ou des photos) et merci beaucoup pour tes contributions.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
naveenpf (2020-09-16 01:48:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89485466
Frans S (2020-08-17 08:47:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are rather accurate. 
Please look for shadowlines of buildings. Do not include courtyards and follow the outlines of the buildings
See this document how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89485519
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-07-16 17:38:34+00:00): Are you sure this road was unpaved or was it paved later?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178849622
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-07-16 17:40:15+00:00): Sorry, but part of this road is paved and you should split it
Rick Morales (2024-07-16 19:36:20+00:00): Road was not paved when I mapped it, but you’re welcome to update it, thanks for bringing this up.
klfb75gxiy21tjrh (2024-07-16 20:50:31+00:00): Ok, thanks 😃
DoctorSpeck (2020-08-17 01:50:51+00:00): not all privately owned roads should be marked private, some should be marked permissive if they are open to the public but privately maintained (think mall ring road/shopping centers. etc)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89485589
MTBPappie (2020-08-17 01:58:57+00:00): Thank you... I'll go back and look at that. Most of the roads I marked also have Private Property/No Trespassing signs next to their entrances. What's the best way to mark this? The owner obviously doesn't want anyone going down the road that doesn't live there!
DoctorSpeck (2020-08-17 18:07:09+00:00): in that case private is the correct semantics as I understand them. Private = only those with permission allowed. for things like government where only official staff are allowed, never general public, access=no
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89485589
DoctorSpeck (2020-08-17 18:09:16+00:00): PS, good work, and keep it up, always nice to have someone new helping to improve the quality of the map!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89485589
Frans S (2020-08-17 08:43:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please map more accurate and squared.


This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89485695
Frans S (2020-08-17 08:14:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are rather fine and accurate. 
Please be more accurate and square all buildings which are rectangular
This document might help to improve your mapping skills
Best regards
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89485752
Frans S (2020-08-17 08:10:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay more attention to accurate and squared mapping. Also do not combine multiple buildings into 1 mapping
This document might be of help
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
before you keep mapping make sure to improve your techniques, 
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89486069
WoodWoseWulf (2020-08-17 01:48:59+00:00): Is this path - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89486631
Accessible to the public or just to the owners of these two houses? If it's not, I would suggest adding access=private so that hikers and other visitors don't attempt to use it.
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-17 02:10:46+00:00): Hi there, wondering what the source for this information is as you haven't listed a source in you changeset. I surveyed this road on 2020-08-08 and the maxspeed was 60km/hr.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-17 04:28:41+00:00): Hi there, there were some overlapping roads on the roundabout which I've removed in changeset 89491791. Also the tagging scheme is junction=roundabout for roundabouts which then implies oneway=yes.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
Ewen Hill (2020-11-21 23:04:45+00:00): Hi Andrew, thanks for your multiple edits. The two culverts added are set to tunnels (probably automatically) - Would Intermittent stream be better?
Andrew Parker (2020-11-23 09:46:19+00:00): Thanks for the heads up Ewen. I don't know what happened there! I think I have fixed them now.
aharvey (2020-08-17 04:48:39+00:00): hi, I'd be surprised if this road segment had a speed limit, typically the 50 only starts once you turn off the main road onto the side road, so this road which is part of the intersection isn't signposted usually.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-03-07 06:30:19+00:00): Fixed in #100561750 as the time you listed was over 4 months ago
mapsamillion78 (2021-03-10 07:12:33+00:00): TfNSW Data services team - thatnkyou for bringing that to our attention and verifying that it has re-opened.
Frans S (2020-08-20 11:00:10+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
serock (2020-08-19 16:27:07+00:00): Hola emiigon, ya le envié mensaje por los changeset y por mp, pero sigue duplicando las vías, tendre que revertir su modificación, saludos.
nevw (2020-08-18 01:44:01+00:00): Hi Ruben
the "Main access road to site" tags are not conventional and I expect not for general public access and likely for temporary personal use.
You may be better using a website like Umap for such things.
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
nevw (2020-08-20 11:34:07+00:00): Hi Ruben
I am inclined to revert this edit as I think it does not appear to me to be suitable for a public map. I am uncertain of its purpose.
Do you agree?
nevw (2020-08-24 06:23:31+00:00): no response
Removed the "Main access road to site" duplicated over other named ways.
Supaplex (2020-08-17 05:01:55+00:00): 高架橋下面的鐵皮屋
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89492638
Kovoschiz (2020-08-17 08:03:09+00:00): 1. Please don't move `natural=peak` and attach it to any line without good reason 
2. Changing between `=footway` and `=path` is not straightforward
3. `landuse=` and `building=` aren't mutually exclusive
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89492886
Kovoschiz (2020-09-03 09:29:11+00:00): Why is the name changed as well?
zuicz (2020-11-24 08:13:22+00:00): Jesteś pewien, że odcinek obwodnicy Oświęcimia od Legionów do Zatorskiej będzie jednojezdniowy?
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:17:06+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
5m4u9 (2020-08-17 22:52:29+00:00): hola, estas mapeando edificios inventados... hay lugares que pusiste edificios y es casi toda una mazana ¿?

en la comunidad hemos discutido esto y estamos borrando directamente porque hace inservible el mapa

si es un trabajo de universidad hacerlo bien y no inventar edificios solo por dibujar

gracias
Kovoschiz (2020-08-17 08:11:31+00:00): There's no need to over-extend the separation
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89495802
Free gems 8 (2020-08-17 12:44:50+00:00): problem fixed.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:17:26+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
Polarbear-repair (2020-11-01 22:34:12+00:00): reverted in CS 93384104: 
DE: Schöneiche: cumulative revert of malicious deletion/shortening of driveways
veljovic (2022-03-20 14:14:48+00:00): Real coordinates of this peak are: 44.097229400398234, 21.811874750904106
GoodClover (2020-08-18 12:47:13+00:00): What is the lone node to the south of this edit for?
It has no tags and isn't connected to anything else.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89497828
rkkapilk (2020-08-19 05:52:29+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added a road and aligned a service road https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6552524255/history as per the geometry. Please let me know if it requires any further modifications. Always happy to learn from the community.
GoodClover (2020-08-19 13:03:19+00:00): Sorry, this edit is perfectly fine, my mistake :)
What I was using to view the changeset (OSMCha) didn't show that the node was part of a way and it looked like it was just a disconnected node.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
pesec (2020-08-17 10:05:53+00:00): Старайтесь, чтобы ваши названия правок отражали суть вносимых изменений.
Taxist23061982 (2020-08-17 15:13:58+00:00): В следующий раз учту)
pesec (2020-08-17 10:04:58+00:00): Старайтесь, чтобы ваши названия правок отражали суть вносимых изменений.
Olga | Yanosik (2020-08-21 07:03:16+00:00): Pozwoliłam sobie dodać na rondzie brakujący tag junction=roundabout, inaczej nawigacje nie generują poprawnych wskazówek :)
Pozdrawiam
m_p_13 (2020-08-21 09:23:08+00:00): Dziękuję
Rondo posiada także wyjazd w kierunku wschodnim. Długość około 50 metrów, znak zakazu ruchu. Takie przygotowanie pod dalszą drogę.
pesec (2020-08-17 10:05:11+00:00): Старайтесь, чтобы ваши названия правок отражали суть вносимых изменений.
pesec (2020-08-17 10:05:29+00:00): Старайтесь, чтобы ваши названия правок отражали суть вносимых изменений.
Andreas Binder (2020-09-01 17:22:03+00:00): Hi Langläufer, du hast auf der Seepromenade  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282767458 wieder bicycle=yes ergänzt. Dort ist kein Radfahren mehr erlaubt (auf aktuellen mapillary-Fotos siehst du die 17er-Gehweg-Verkehrschilder). Ich habe bicycle daher wieder auf no gesetzt. Grüße Andreas
Langlaeufer (2020-09-01 18:06:29+00:00): Ich war vor Ort! Das Radfahren ist nur im bereich des westlichen Parkplatzes verboten, oder hab ich was übersehen?
Andreas Binder (2020-09-01 18:11:45+00:00): Eigentlich ist der Weg ab https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/S5rui96vmhk8fLwjJOZIOF ein reiner Gehweg
Langlaeufer (2020-09-01 18:20:00+00:00): Ok, du hast mich überzeugt.
Andreas Binder (2020-09-01 18:36:08+00:00): Ist auch Nullproblem. Ich hatten nur kürzlich wegen der gleichen Stelle schon mal Kontakt mit einem anderen Mapper ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2295759) Viel Spaß beim Mappen Grüße Andreas
szydzio (2020-09-25 12:13:09+00:00): Nie twórz proszę fikcyjnych mostów ani nie podwyższaj bez powodu kategorii dróg => https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108523192/history . Przy przecięciu cieków wodnych z drogami zwróć proszę uwagę aby nie tworzyć z automatu brodów, rozważ raczej przepusty.
abakus_uploader (2020-08-17 22:31:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Glassman (2020-08-17 14:19:48+00:00): From the aerial imagery the new residential road doesn't look like one. Can you relook at this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89500523
Frans S (2020-08-21 10:06:09+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are a bit below par.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
mueschel (2020-08-19 09:33:44+00:00): Hi,
all the nodes you imported here don't have any common tag. Please read the wiki and use only keys that are documented there.

Thanks.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-17 08:13:50+00:00): Please don't add `layer=-1` to roads under roofs. Use `covered=yes`, and limit it to the immediate segment
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89502645
Free gems 8 (2020-08-17 12:26:42+00:00): I didn't add that information!
Free gems 8 (2020-08-17 12:44:27+00:00): problem fixed.
Leo Slager (2020-08-17 11:28:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2020-08-17 11:33:26+00:00): Dag Milan,
Je hebt de Waarderstraat nu gewijzigd in Streefkerkstraat. Was dat ook je bedoeling ?
ik draai deze wijziging terug.
Tomas Straupis (2020-08-17 10:02:27+00:00): Darželis tikriausiai ne šitame name, o šiek tiek piečiau?
Linas Kiguolis (2020-08-17 10:57:16+00:00): Teisingai, dėkui už pastabą 😊
Leo Slager (2020-08-17 11:39:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2020-08-17 11:44:41+00:00): Dag Robin,
De voorgaande, ervaren mapper heeft dat niet geconstateerd. Staan er borden die dat aangeven ?
Access=no gebruiken we alleen als er het bekende verkeersbord wit met rode rand staat.
bicycle=yes op een path is overbodig.
ik ben van plan je wijziging terug te draaien.
RobinEv (2020-08-17 12:38:30+00:00): Dag Leo,

Bedankt voor je reactie en welkomstmail. Ja er staat specifiek bij dit pad een paaltje met MBT pad + daaronder het bordje verboden voor voetgangers. Ik heb daarop gisteren mijn route aangepast.  Het bordje staat op de kruising aan de bovenzijde van de driehoek zichtbaar op de kaart.
Leo Slager (2020-08-17 13:36:57+00:00): oké, prima bijdrage.
Dan kan sac_scale er van af.
En foot=no ipv access=no
Crusier (2020-08-21 08:04:32+00:00): To nie jest formalna nazwa trasy. Proszę sprawdzić w uchwałach:

https://edziennik.mazowieckie.pl/legalact/2020/8144/

https://edziennik.mazowieckie.pl/legalact/2020/8339/

https://edziennik.mazowieckie.pl/legalact/2020/8536/
Mike Raust (2020-09-02 20:09:47+00:00): Hi GITNE,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7819637259 is a little weird. Are this entrances ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance ) ?
Mike Raust (2020-09-02 20:11:05+00:00): Oh, I'm very sorry. They are tagged as entrances!
Larmax (2020-09-09 15:36:24+00:00): Please add the units (letters like a,b c etc) to a separate addr:unit= tag, unless the house number actually has a letter, which isn't the case here.