piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
z-z-z88 (2022-05-04 05:06:48+00:00): Source - my own experience, there is metro entrance with metro sign, I entered metro from there
carfog81 (2022-05-04 14:37:55+00:00): Please do not damage relation type entities, both multipolygon and route
Pegasus21 (2022-05-04 15:39:01+00:00): Carfog81, Thanks for bringing this to my attention- I will try to be more careful.
user_5359 (2022-05-04 11:30:44+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte den Unterschied zwischen payment (wie gezahlt wird) und fee (welche Höhe gezahlt wird). Den Hinweis auf die Tourismustaxe kann dann in ein fee:description aufgenommen werden.
A67-A67 (2022-05-03 21:11:18+00:00): Hoi Jeroen,
Volgens mij een Kippenlijn slechts een bijnaam, vanwege de vele pluimveeteelt in de Gelderse Vallei. Het is geen officiele naam. De naam zou dan dus thuishoren in de tag local_name, niet name.
JeroenvanderGun (2022-05-03 22:27:06+00:00): Ik heb hem naar loc_name verplaatst.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120518137
A67-A67 (2022-05-04 12:37:11+00:00): Bedankt!
user_2066394 (2022-05-04 11:00:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3958089680
Braucht der keine Postleitzahl?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224544713
Was hat es mit der note auf sich?
Net-net (2022-05-04 15:52:05+00:00): Ich bin bisher immer der Ansicht gefolgt, dass addr:city und addr:postal_code redundant zu den jeweiligen Boundary in DE sind.
Das Gebäude trug bis vor Kurzem ein altes Schild mit Straße/Hausnummer, welches nicht mehr (seit Jahrzehnten) der Straßenbenennung folgt. Die Demontage habe ich mit StreetComplete als Notiz abgelegt.
Net-net (2022-05-04 15:54:09+00:00): Korrektur: addr:postal_code -> addr:postcode
user_2066394 (2022-05-04 21:59:22+00:00): Der Fehlerhinweis wäre ganz praktisch im Changeset-Kommentar gewesen, gibt gleich mehr Kontext.
◪ Jarv (2022-05-03 20:30:26+00:00): Welcome to Open Street Map. Your edits seem to be fine at a glace, however when uploading/saving your changes, please ensure they are in a similar location (i.e. same town). Because in this changeset you have made edits in both India and the UK, it appears on all areas between that for people reviewing changes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120514273
gerads (2022-05-03 21:09:50+00:00): Didn't realize that Edward Jones was in the other half of this building. Roll back and add nodes for each?
Danysan95 (2025-03-17 20:20:31+00:00): In this and other changesets you updated some elements adding name:etymology=*, name:etymology:wikidata=* and name:start_date=* but without any name=*. These tags only make sense together with name=* (or another name tag), what's the name of these elements? Examples: https://osm.org/way/119516880 , https://osm.org/node/8072092918 , https://osm.org/way/4407998 . 
For one of them, https://osm.org/relation/4156592 , I found out that it was caused by duplicate elements, name=* was on one and name:etymology=* was on another one (fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/163749077 )
skunk (2025-03-22 08:08:37+00:00): Thanks for catching my mistake(s). I've already cleaned up some of those. I'm still working on it!
ali 1375 (2022-05-03 20:41:04+00:00): if someone wants to change Persain Gulf's name or revert my changes, please mention reasons of that action.
carfog81 (2022-05-04 14:38:09+00:00): Please do not damage relation type entities, both multipolygon and route
eggie (2022-05-04 06:28:06+00:00): Dag Jj  Je vraagt feedback..  Je hebt de highway=steps nu verwijderd, maar die is er toch gewoon?

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120515303

Even een paar keer CTRL-F5 dan zie je dat de trap weg is. Moet die niet terug?

MVG
eggie
Jj188 (2022-05-04 11:02:07+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
De trap bestaat niet, op de plek van het oorspronkelijk aangegeven voetpad is een externe hellingbaan die naar de eerste verdieping van het  bijliggende pand leidt, maar dit is geen openbare weg. Er ligt wel een voedpad zoals ik die heb aangegeven langs het pand, zonder trap. Vandaar de aanpassing.
eggie (2022-05-04 11:05:48+00:00): Oke .. duidelijk..
Mapse
Eggie
skyper (2022-07-26 15:21:53+00:00): Hi Marcos
This changeset covers a huge area. Please, upload more often in smaller areas.
Why did you add two `leisure=playground` inside an area with this tag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220410672)? If you try to tag individual constructions, please, take at look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground.
Cheers skyper
Marcos Dione (2022-07-26 18:37:33+00:00): yeah, I see, sorry, it was data I picked up with OsmAnd on a road trip. I'll try to be more careful.
Marcos Dione (2022-07-26 18:42:43+00:00): > Why did you add two `leisure=playground` inside an area with this tag?

I'm not sure. Either OsmAnd is not rendering playground areas, or my data files were old (but I'm pretty sure I downloaded them right before this trip, given that I didn't have them before), or some other (wrong) reason.

I will have to review my editing workflow.
skyper (2022-07-26 19:17:06+00:00): Thanks for the answer.
In fact the playground area was added not long time before you edits, so little outdated data could be a reason. I doubt that the area is not rendered in OsmAnd but this can depend on your settings, so you might want to check this.
Regarding the size of a CS, this probably can be solved manually by paying attention but you might ask the developer to warn you about the huge size and offer to split it in parts by creating an issue at https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd.
Happy mapping,
skyper
JJIglesias (2022-05-03 22:19:09+00:00): Slds. por las caracteristicas eso NO califica como Pedestrian Street, sino como Foot Path, pues es una senda peatonal.

Lo cambie si quieres revisalo.

Gracias

JJ
Skinoku (2022-05-05 09:11:20+00:00): Ciao!
Grazie per aver contribuito ad openstreetmap.
Come standard italiano, i numeri di telefono vanno inseriti con questo formato (non tutto attaccato):
+39 011 9032635
(spazio dopo il prefisso internazionale e dopo quello locale).
Fonte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
Grazie e buon divertimento!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120515611
mauiercole (2022-05-05 10:22:16+00:00): Ciao,
grazie per la segnalazione.
Ho appena iniziato a mappare e devo approfondire le regole.
Sto usando Osmose-QA per individuare i problemi nei dati che carico su OpenStreetMap
Skinoku (2022-05-05 14:23:28+00:00): Ottimo.
I miei sono suggerimenti, non critiche :)
Bene che usi osmose.
Se deciderai di passare all'editor JOSM, lì potrai installare del tool per validare il tuo lavoro prima di caricarlo, ad esempio l'ottimo Mapthisway.
A presto
VA00 (2022-06-07 18:46:44+00:00): Przejście od Przy Torze do Pierwszej jest POD torami?
kszyrztow (2022-06-07 19:22:45+00:00): tak to jest w zasadzie przepust dla rzeczki ale z chodnikiem obok jak sie schylić, taki tunel w nasypie kolejowym
stary kalosz (2022-06-07 19:25:21+00:00): nie to konto, ale j/w
eggie (2022-05-04 05:51:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
ملاك ساقط (2022-05-03 21:18:01+00:00): Please be honest about your mapping. This changeset hasn't added a single ft of power lines: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120516103
KB-01 (2022-05-03 23:13:48+00:00): I extended one along Connecticut Avenue all the way from Kensington to the Purple line bridge, and added some more in the homewood neighborhood. All of these are visible in your link.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-03 20:57:00+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 120411956, 120412408, 120412812, 120449435, 120449621, 120449698, 120449976, 120450012, 120450073, 120451289, 120451352, 120451383, 120451456, 120451486, 120451520, 120451555, 120451609, 120451727, 120451768, 120451799, 120451826, 120451846, 120451873, 120451902, 120451937, 120451962, 120451997, 120452021, 120452095, 120452127, 120452150, 120452187, 120452205, 120452234, 120452256, 120452289, 120452330, 120452350, 120514905.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
Lejun (2022-05-04 13:38:59+00:00): Aaah, d’autres amateurs de trottoirs ! Merci pour la contribution qui m’a l’air propre. Une erreur cependant sur le rond point (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1057005553) où tu as préféré oneway à junction=roundabout comme sur l’élément que tu as supprimé. Dans les fait ça change pas grand chose, mais sur le papier tu conviendras qu’il y a plus à comprendre dans un rond-point que dans un sens-unique. Je te laisse faire la correction.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-25 21:11:19+00:00): name=Ettonet
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6030442443

shop=aid ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?

(if anyone wants I can provide list of weird shop values in some country/area - let me know if you are interested, some are already at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mateusz_Konieczny/unusual_shop_values )
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-05 19:47:42+00:00): Waterways should not be duplicated
emersonveenstra (2022-05-03 21:44:00+00:00): Hi,

This is vandalism. There's no reason for deleting these. I am reverting this changeset and next time will be reporting to the DWG. Sorry to be short, but you're erasing other people's contributions for no reason and that's just not cool. If your program can't figure out how to change data that's already there, then it's not welcome here.
emersonveenstra (2022-05-03 21:47:11+00:00): Note that when I say vandalism, I mean OSM's definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism "is intentionally ignoring the consensus norms of the OpenStreetMap community about editing data"
emersonveenstra (2022-05-03 21:47:44+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120517379
skquinn (2022-05-03 21:31:25+00:00): This also includes highway edits (lane counts, lane use, placement) that should have gone in another changeset (oops)
marczoutendijk (2022-05-04 19:37:02+00:00): Why not using a proper changeset comment here?
MxxCon (2022-05-04 01:24:58+00:00): Hello.
Bus stop names are supposed to be fully spelled out.
Bus stop number is supposed to into "ref" tag, not "ref:MTA".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120517180
promiseofbirth (2022-06-09 22:47:00+00:00): Okay, got it
Alex W2 (2022-10-02 06:32:39+00:00): Thank you!
Anton Melnichuk (2022-05-05 00:03:49+00:00): please do not edit the map of Ukraine during the war
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
Portunes (2022-05-05 00:14:13+00:00): Hi Anton, I was not aware of this but I understand it. Is there someone I can contact to remove my edits and hide them?
Anton Melnichuk (2022-05-05 00:29:23+00:00): I'll roll out on my own
eggie (2022-05-04 06:07:23+00:00): Oke... I added the source:date  and removed phone= from the buildingshape. 

Gr eggie
JJIglesias (2022-05-04 02:22:41+00:00): Slds. Desconozco lo q estas tratando de hacer, pero sea lo q sea ESTA MAL. Si quieres agregar edificios o construcciones tiene q ser el AREA SOLAMENTE de la construccion y NO las areas totales del lote donde se encuentra tal edificacion. Por favor deten cualquier edicion de ese tipo o nos veremos en la necesidad de Borrar todos tus cambios. Te envie un correo directo con instrucciones. Por favor contesta este mensaje antes de seguir adelante.
Gracias
JJ
jeslop (2022-05-04 08:43:23+00:00): ¿Hay alguna razón para eliminar el nombre de la carretera EX-105?

Según la Junta de Extremadura su nombre es el que has borrado:

https://ciudadano.gobex.es/web/infraestructuras/mapa-de-carreteras

En el futuro no borres información útil sin explicar los motivos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-17 01:30:57+00:00): Hi, there was already a node within the Brewery St post office building with amenity=post_office and the name, so you generally shouldn't add "Post Office" to the building (unless you're deleting the node and transferring all the relevant tags to the building). See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Thanks
jimkats (2022-07-11 21:38:30+00:00): Αααα, τώρα το είδα, κατέστρεψες κτήρια με τις μετακινήσεις που έκανες. Θέλει πολλή προσοχή όταν μετακινείς πράγματα, γιατί μπορεί να είναι συνδεδεμένα με άλλα.
DressyPear4 (2022-05-04 02:22:08+00:00): Verifique melhor a classificação das vias.
As edições que você fez foram revertidas!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120518430
Facalderonm (2022-08-23 02:26:56+00:00): Please, be careful with your editions. You wrongly put a link (from Av. Calle 84 Sur) not connecting with Av. Carrera 14.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-04 00:35:01+00:00): voce deletou varias vias aqui e criou nova com nível hierárquico errado, maiores que deveriam ser. jamais deveria ser uma via primária, por favor corrija
cronoser (2022-05-03 23:18:31+00:00): el changeset correcto corregido ha sido 68677303
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-05-07 14:46:10+00:00): Hi, good work. But you could also use better aerial photos. Bing's qualty isn't best. You can choose them from the righthand menu. The best ones are Esri and Maa-amet (Estonian land board, available only in Estonia, obviously). Maa-amet's are also more recent and you can see that one of the buildings has changed it's shape recently.
user4816003805 (2022-05-13 18:02:30+00:00): Nice work. Looks good from what I can see.
Thanks for adding those new crosswalks near J-town.
jafarbeek (2023-03-23 06:26:52+00:00): Why you have changed the state borders between Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan? Your editing is very inappropriate. Can you provide source?
Seandebasti (2023-05-02 19:39:18+00:00): Sorry but, I can´t see any edit by me to the border according to osmcha. Could you provide information where there was a change? thx
SomeoneElse (2023-05-02 21:21:40+00:00): For info, the boundary problem is unrelated to this changeset.  See the discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130698589 .  To see the Uzbekistan border at a date in time you can use overpass; for example https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1utz is a year ago and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1utA is December.  If there's a problem with the border please discuss on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130698589 , where the people previously involved in the discussion will see it.
ralley (2022-05-04 00:44:40+00:00): Why have you removed the building tag?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120519514
yrtimiD (2022-05-06 23:08:41+00:00): Hi, you did a pretty big "cleanup". Did you discussed it with original mapper or with the community?
There is an old forum topic about this case: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=3820
0xdavid (2022-05-08 09:46:59+00:00): This is in line with the thread you linked
TBH, i've left more info than what the thread agreed upon, i've left the base name markings and where they are at. this is to ensure that people are able to get to their correct base

I've removed all the buildings so that in case of a malicious intent, its harder to understand what building are there
0xdavid (2022-05-08 09:50:19+00:00): Additionally, its against the law for me to not act upon information like this

See the comment @ https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=347209#p347209

Rough translation - if I see information that can be used against Israel or its citizens to potentially harm them, and do not act upon that information - I am subject to 3 to 15 years of imprisonment (depends on the sub case)
0xdavid (2022-05-08 09:51:34+00:00): And, this change is inline with the current status of other large military bases, as in @ 32.14179, 34.81394
SekeRob (2022-05-07 11:54:18+00:00): Hi,

Flagged by Osmose, is this new track crossing the stream by bridge or have you got to wade thru i.e. a ford.

cheers.
Frans S (2022-05-04 14:47:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not  in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
1. Use the correct imagery. Maxar Premium !
2. You mapped over already mapped buildings. You should have seen the remark on the bottom of your screen which says that many objects are still hidden. Zoom in to get them in view.
Tagging of buildings is just "building=yes'
No landuse = residential.
The quality of your mappings is rather poor.
Not following the outlines.
Did you not see the issues before you uploaded your work ? This is an indication that you map wrongly.
I have to revert your mappings .




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120520486
felipeeugenio (2022-05-04 13:36:38+00:00): Hola Alonso. por favor no etiquetemos cada cosa con pasto como park. esa etiqueta es para plazas y parques. Para un area verde de bandejón central o una punta de diamante usar grass. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120520744
EllieNyaa (2022-05-04 01:44:19+00:00): My comment was truncated, so posting in full here:

Realign misaligned features along/near Saline Waterworks Road. This is part of a larger cleanup that needs to take place in the Saline area, as most features in the city are misaligned following edits made in 2019/2020. Other than the editor who did this, no other edits before/after show such misalignment, nor does it make sense considering the surrounding area which is not misaligned. Additionally, many roads follow municipal boundaries, and said municipal boundaries were also misaligned by these edits from what they were before. Feel free to contact me if you have more questions about this, but I've done my due diligence to make sure I am improving things here.
wireguy (2022-05-05 10:59:55+00:00): hi Ellie, check relation 135134,
way 668509175 looks to have been left in the relation, but should be removed.   josm's validator found this, maybe it should be included in the due diligence?
EllieNyaa (2022-05-22 03:42:34+00:00): Apologies for the late reply and the error. I wasn't particularly familiar with how relations worked so I can see how I would've made such a mistake; my "due diligence" was more referring to making sure I was reflecting on-the-ground reality correctly with my edits. Thank you for correcting this error!
Frans S (2022-05-06 11:35:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120520787
DP24PH (2022-05-04 02:39:24+00:00): STATEMENT FROM DP24: Upon changeset boundary analysis, it is found that due to errors on our part, it got extended from PHL to TUV. Apologies for inconveniences, and rest assured that all errors will be rectified on subsequent edits. Thank you very much.


DP24
trigpoint (2022-05-04 08:41:04+00:00): Please keep your changes to sensible areas. This changeset covers a large area, several countries and should be broken into several smaller changes.
BodhidharmaI (2022-05-04 11:07:37+00:00): And why? Just because the bounding box _visually_ covers large area, doesn’t mean the changeset itself is large. I see no reason to artificially break anything down further. The changes are consistent between themselves within a changeset - which I think is more important
RaccoonFederation (2022-05-04 11:28:41+00:00): Because it makes life harder for everyone else. It's hard to monitor changes in a local area when the history is spammed by people making global changes, most of which are unnecessary anyway.
BodhidharmaI (2022-05-04 23:26:57+00:00): By the same token, monitoring changes in a local area most of the time is unnecessary anyway
BodhidharmaI (2022-05-04 23:29:56+00:00): But if you still do it by using only crude tools for that, don’t try to blame your overload on other editors ;)
By the way, here’s another tool for you - maybe it will help reduce your workload:
https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120521090&relations=true
Cheers
OddlyAngled (2022-05-04 05:25:53+00:00): thanks, I couldn't figure out an easy way to tackle this in parts. Yosemite/Hoover/Ansel Adams/Emigrant have a similar problem too, though not quite as bad
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120521206
mavl (2022-05-20 16:10:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
kylor (2022-05-04 03:38:21+00:00): this is not an import I hand drew this, I was on the wrong account my bad.
user_5359 (2022-05-05 16:47:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:59:27+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:59:08+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, GPS traces, and Mapilliary scans.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:10:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:10:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:10:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:09:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:09:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:58:39+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces. Woods needs work.
Supaplex (2022-05-04 05:34:31+00:00): Hi, 

There is Taiwan Community highway tagging scheme, the provincial highway should be tagged as highway=primary
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan/Taiwan_tagging#%E4%B8%80%E7%B4%9A%E9%81%93%E8%B7%AF%EF%BC%8F%E7%9C%81%E9%81%93%EF%BC%88Primary_Roads_/_Provincial_Highways%EF%BC%89
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120523735