piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-03-03 06:57:29+00:00): Kijk hier even hoe scholen te mappen.
Het beste een vlak amenity = school over het terrein zetten.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
eggie (2020-03-03 07:39:40+00:00): Scholen zijn best lastig, want het kan op meer manieren. De info heb ik overgezet naar het terrein.
De gebouwen zou je nog van construction kunnen halen als ze gereed zijn.
Veel pleziet met mappen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-03 08:13:57+00:00): Toch nog maar even op landuse =construction gezet.
Cristoffs (2021-01-13 17:19:06+00:00): Na podstawie tego typu dokumentów nie nanosimy zmian w OSM. Proszę wycofaj tą zmianę. Inwestycje  kolejowe są nanoszone dopiero po uzyskaniu minimum decyzji środowiskowej.
trampintheforest (2020-06-15 13:10:10+00:00): Hallo Jochen,
wäre man_made=embankment für die Geländekanten am Fockeberg nicht treffender als natural=cliff? Ich finde cliff passt hier nicht und natural auch nicht :D
Viele Grüße! :)
JochenB (2020-06-15 15:13:04+00:00): ja, stimmt, der Berg ist ja nicht natürlich. Wenn es ein normaler Berg wäre, dann schon.
user_5359 (2021-03-13 06:06:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777873488: Did you mean addr:unit=300 instead the value 3000?
mueschel (2020-03-04 09:42:34+00:00): Hi,
You added many 'addr_stree' tags. Please have a look and fix this spelling mistake -> 'addr:street'

Thanks!
mueschel (2020-03-04 09:43:55+00:00): You also added some 'currentUse' tags that are not used in any other place. Is this tag part of the discussed documentation of this import?
Nestor Armas (2020-03-04 14:12:07+00:00): Hi,
I already solved the problem with "addr_stree". It is a QGIS error. The ":" makes them "_" and the software considers that the tag is very long, so do not write it completely.

On the other hand, the "currentUse" tag comes from the Spanish Cadastre, which I forgot to delete on this occasion.

Greetings.
aharvey (2020-03-03 02:51:38+00:00): Is your only source NSW LPI Imagery? One month ago this area was changed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80055995 due to re-development and construction to remove the turns.
Maradona11 (2020-03-03 04:31:41+00:00): I did rely on LPI imagery only!. Oversight not looking at last changeset.  I have reverted my changes. thank you for letting us know.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-04 13:40:24+00:00): Hello - please don't add test data to OpenStreetMap!  If you want to experiment with the editors, you can do so over at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (an exact copy of the main site apart from the map display).  
Best Regards,
Andy
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-23 11:09:06+00:00): 您好，您标注的大量(原)(现)(微山县)字段出现在name中是不符合OSM原则的，望您尽快自行处理，积极按照其他编辑者的惯例，而非自创一派高速逆行。

谢谢！
CRCulver (2020-03-03 13:45:50+00:00): I see that you replaced indoor=corridor with highway=corridor. Why did you feel that this tagging was more appropriate?

As the wiki explains, "Some more recent tagging systems, such as Simple Indoor Tagging, use a different set of tags under the indoor=* key."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor

And it is the Simple Indoor Tagging schema that I am trying to use in my own indoor mapping.
maro21 (2020-03-04 21:41:45+00:00): iD suggested me the change. I see that there are two ways of mapping a corridor? You can change it back if you feel like.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-07 06:49:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81891682 where the changeset comment is: Backing out of edit that largely ignored lane tagging, tunnel versus bridge, and other difficult to resolve, significant reductions in level of detail.
MikeN (2020-03-03 03:29:39+00:00): Please upload an area before moving onto another area to avoid giant changesets that span half the country.
Kovoschiz (2020-03-03 11:57:17+00:00): Perhaps it could be `access=discouraged`?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81705827
Kovoschiz (2020-03-03 11:58:50+00:00): Also tag unsigned and difficulty?
Tyrese Wormely (2020-03-03 03:35:27+00:00): Whoops! I meant "Edit No. 300"! LOL
Arun Ganesh (2022-01-01 15:26:15+00:00): destructivo https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=81706280
rhtb0 (2023-10-01 09:01:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EB%A0%8C%EB%8D%94%EB%9F%AC%EC%97%90_%EA%B1%B0%EC%A7%93%EB%A7%90%ED%95%98%EA%B8%B0
보이는대로 그리지 말라
SK53 (2021-07-25 13:26:50+00:00): Hi mapman44,

I see that you removed source=Google 2010-01-17 etc from several thousand ways. This was unnecessary: the ways were legitimately entered from a specific aerial imagery flown on that date for earthquake damage assessment. This was the one & only time that OSM has used google sources. 
 
Removing the tag actually takes away a little bit of OSM history: when first responders wanted the data in OSM enough to persuade Google to allow it.

Jerry aka SK53
mapman44 (2021-07-25 13:36:36+00:00): Sorry for the problem. You are welcome to restore the data if it is still relavant 11 years later.
SK53 (2021-07-25 13:46:01+00:00): No I won't do that: edits twiddling things like source tags give the spurious impression that the area has been updated. I would imagine a heck of a lot has changed in Port-au-Prince in the past 11 years.

I'm just trying to get a handle on rumours of these data being suspicious, and obviously part of the problem is that many are unaware of this episode in OSM's past.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 15:37:33+00:00): @mapman44 why did you remove these tags - what benefit do you think it had, given that the underlying data is unchanged?
Cheers,
Andy
mapman44 (2021-07-25 16:12:56+00:00): @SomeoneElse - Since the edits were done about a year ago I don't remember the precise reasons but probably JOSM validation identified the reference to Google as tags that should be removed. I will be happy to revert the changeset.
GinaroZ (2020-03-17 15:51:39+00:00): Did you survey the area around the castle? Because I don't think this path actually connects the castle to the road... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777892352
camelCaseNick (2020-03-05 01:39:14+00:00): Hey,
you have added a wikidata tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7259852106. That is a link to wikipedia, but it seems to be the article on the village and not the temple itself.
CamelCaseNick
SHARCRASH (2020-03-03 12:28:32+00:00): Hello! Why the access=no + foot=yes on this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486471842/ ?
yoko99 (2020-03-05 00:19:15+00:00): because access is allowed only on foot ...
SHARCRASH (2020-03-05 00:33:19+00:00): A path by its basic definition is quote: "A generic or multi-use path open to non-motorized traffic." So this means usually one person large mode of transportation like a pedestrian, bicycle, etc... It's already obvious the bigger transportation can't use this way. 

The access key is for all means of transportantion, meaning it englobes all of them so contributord would not need to add all tags for the specific tranportation access. Never wondered why the way is greyed out when you added access=no or private? It's contradictory to add the combination you used and deceives the map users...
SHARCRASH (2020-03-05 00:34:47+00:00): Sorry for the misspellings, on smartphone now
iriman (2020-03-04 08:14:18+00:00): سلام، اگر درست حدس زده باشم این راه را برای شمارش درست خروجی‌ها حذف کردید. درسته؟
iriman (2020-03-04 15:35:28+00:00): فارغ از دلیل حذف، مشکلی که بهش برخوردم اینه که در مسیریابی به پارکینگ، خیابان جانبازان پیشنهاد میشه (اسماند). درحالیکه ورودی پارکینگ از میدان شهداست و یک فرد ناآشنا یک دور قمری میزنه و بعد میفهمه که از همون میدان باید وارد میشد. راهکاری برای این به نظرتون میرسه؟
hasaan22 (2020-03-06 17:41:08+00:00): سلام 
بله درست است  برای شمارش درست خروجی ها بود چون  کاربری به ما گزارش داده بود که اینجا خیابانی وجود ندارد فقط یه .گاراژ هست که از آن به عنوان پارکینگ 
استفاده میشود
من فک میکردم به اون پارکینگی راهی وجود ندارد اگر کسی اون نقطه رو انتخاب کند تا نزدیکترین محل که همان میدان است میبرد. 
من دوباره خط ورودی به پارکینگ را کشیدم
ممنون
iriman (2020-03-06 18:58:47+00:00): ممنون از شما. همین‌طور است که گفتید. راهی به معنای کوچه و خیابان اینجا نیست. رسم این راه یک خروجی زیاد میکند که به طور طبیعی کسی خروجی حسابش نمیکند و از طرفی رسم نکردنش راه دسترسی به گاراژ را مبهم میکند.
Herbert167 (2020-05-16 06:09:17+00:00): Hallo bimbo666,
Kann es sein, dass Du in diesem Änderungssatz den highway=turning_circle, node/4755944230, versehentlich an den jetzigen Ort verschoben hast? Zum einen hat dies offensichtlich nichts mit dem ursprünglichen Anliegen dieser Änderung „Höchstgeschwindigkeit“ zu tun. Zum anderen, ist es sehr ungewöhnlich, dass der damit verbundene Weg nun in gerader Linie an 6 Stellen 5 andere Wege kreuzt, mit denen er überhaupt nicht verbunden ist. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi//?changeset=81707738
Herbert167 (2020-05-22 19:08:24+00:00): Hab´s inzwischen korrigiert
aharvey (2020-03-05 02:16:30+00:00): do you know how it's signposted on the ground? Generally the rule of thumb is to follow signposts, we don't have much Mapillary coverage here so I can't check remotely but https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ZqTnQF2UPkmUYZvfRaKb8Q does just say "Belmore Road"
Mir76 (2020-03-03 10:08:33+00:00): Здравствуйте!

А почему у вас новый дом на старый накладывается?
user_5359 (2020-03-03 17:32:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
carlwalsh (2024-04-24 20:22:03+00:00): For Seagull and Mariner, what was the reason to tag access=private? If you enter this neighborhood from Hill Road, there aren't any NO TRESPASSING signs. The roads are privately owned, but so are many neighborhood roads that are publically accessible.
rababdul (2024-04-26 07:33:50+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for looking into the change set. We have added access=private tag based on the driver feedback. If you are local or going to survey this location please make the appropriate changes or let us know, we would be happy to update the map. For further information, kindly go through this diary post: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jguthula/diary/392437.

Thanks and Regards,
rababdul
evgenykatyshev (2020-03-04 15:41:19+00:00): Зачем вы удаляет дома, а потом добавляете точно такой же в нескольких метрах? Можно же было просто подвинуть их.
evgenykatyshev (2020-03-04 15:45:37+00:00): Я ошибся, вы всё правильно делаете.
mueschel (2020-03-04 09:44:50+00:00): Hi,
you added 'breadth' tags on many playgrounds. What does it mean, it's not used anywhere else.

Jan
nevw (2020-03-03 07:58:24+00:00): Hi
“The Avenue Hospital” is already mapped on the osm. Why have you added another?
nevw (2020-03-03 10:59:55+00:00): I deleted your edit as this must have been accidentally added.
PT-53 (2020-04-17 05:13:49+00:00): Hallo okilimu,
nach Deiner Bearbeitung wird in KeppRight für diesen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7260005275
ein Hinweis "unterschiedliche Layer in Kreuzung, Punkt 7260005275" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=117818256
OSMI:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.62096&lat=47.83044&zoom=18&opacity=0.91&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
okilimu (2020-04-17 07:57:14+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
danke für den Hinweis, ich habe meinen Fehler korrigiert
geoaria (2020-04-03 10:29:57+00:00): سلام
خواهشمند است در ویرایش ها دقت کنید و از جداسازی و ایجاد حالت جزیره در مسیر های خودداری نمایید. ورودی خودرو یک مسیر residential ممنوع کرده اید و مسیر دسترسی به کوچه های متصل به آن را مشخص نکرده اید. به این صورت مسیر residential  به صورت جزیره در می آید  یا تمام مسیر را غیر ماشین رو کنید یا مسیر ورود خودرو را به آن مشخص کنید.
32.62690/51.69524
بهار
araash (2020-04-13 10:56:39+00:00): سلام متشکرم حتما توجه میکنم
seav (2020-04-22 13:37:39+00:00): This changeset has been partially reverted by changeset 83944525. The former changeset changed a type=boundary relation into a type=multipolygon relation
Mahdi Nameghi (2020-03-03 07:31:27+00:00): سلام
تغییراتی که در نقشه اعمال کردین در یک نقطه اشتباه اعمال شده و باعث رسم اشتباه و خرابی در نقشه شده است.
ممنون میشم با دقت بیشتری تغییرات رو اعمال کنید
literan (2020-03-03 16:59:32+00:00): первый вариант мне больше нравится)
pio2_122 (2020-03-04 19:07:08+00:00): Proszę, nie zmieniaj tego co już poprawiłem...
Np. budynki na terenie wojskowym https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767620684/history
Zmieniasz tag na mniej szczegółowy i dublujesz landuse. Ten szablon jest do użycia na obszarze a nie dla konretnych budynków.
abrensch (2020-03-04 13:16:12+00:00): Hi karmsudi,

this one looks more then sloppy...

you created a service-road behind a "no-exit" Node??

and left the existing residential-stub untouched, creating a mixed residential/service way with a no-exit node in between.

And put private access, while on Bing you see public parking??

Please, do your edits with reasonable care !
karmsudi (2020-03-04 13:43:07+00:00): Hi abrensch,

Thanks for taking the time to review my edit. I had miscalculated barrier as gate and added the private access. Now, I have modified the geometry and edited the access tags as suggested using the private Maxar imagery. Please find the changeset(81777626) for suggested modifications. Once again, thanks for the quick review. Please let me know in case of anymore modifications. Always happy to improve the editing hygiene  from the community suggestions.

Regards
karmsudi
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-03-03 12:40:24+00:00): thanks for sorting this. this and few other sequences in the area seems to be an organized editing of high school geography class. i have reached two editors to ask the teacher to contact me. sadly no one replied.

Cheers
jmapb (2020-03-03 23:04:26+00:00): Hi Robert -- you've been adding a lot of service roads in NYC and, and thanks for that, it's a lot of good work. But I'm also seeing a lot of changesets like this where you're distorting the roads you're connecting to.

I've been trying to fix these when I notice them but lately it's looking like I can't  keep up.

See https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=81716983 and zoom into Crawford Ave for a example of what I've been seeing and fixing.

Thanks, Jason
roberts_telenav (2020-03-04 13:24:04+00:00): Hello Jason.
Thank you for letting me know. I will try to keep the main roads unchanged.
Best regards, Robert
adiatmad (2023-10-31 06:01:46+00:00): Hello, I noticed you added the "elevation=" tag. May I kindly suggest using the "ele=" tag instead? You can find more details on this in the Wiki page linked here. Thank you!
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele)
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/306396212)
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/305312357)
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/363295603)
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/305312335)
Claudius Henrichs (2020-05-18 15:16:08+00:00): Hi there,
Based on which information did you reclassify road 16 to a motorway? In the Iranian OSM project the motorway classification is reserved to true Freeway (Azadrah) of which only a handful exist, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeways_in_Iran
The Road 16 which you upgraded the classification for is a backbone of the long distance connectivity in the region, but not built out to motorway standard in any way as far as I know and can validate from Maxar. I am also lacking on the ground knowledge though. So I would love to hear based on which source you upgraded the tagging.
GlacierPeak (2020-05-19 00:43:27+00:00): Hi Claudius. I agree that it should not be motorway, you can change it back to trunk. It was changed to motorway in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80810784, I changed it to trunk for some of the reasons you listed, but then I realized the user who made the change may have local knowledge and there are no precise guidelines on what should be a motorway in Iran. It does not seem to meet global motorway standards in the most recent imagery.
adiatmad (2024-06-24 04:45:24+00:00): Good day, do you think that using highway=path is appropriate for this?

(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/773775132)
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nepal/Roads#Tagging_rural_pedestrian_paths)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
maraf24 (2020-03-03 17:51:42+00:00): Podstawa zmiana jest podana w polu "source" zestawu zmian.
W komentarzu fajnie byłoby w paru słowach opisać, na czym ta zmiana polega:)
Tutaj pasowałoby "dodanie budynków i nazwy ulicy"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
ليث الغانم (2022-07-27 20:22:10+00:00): Yathrib Subdistrict ناحية يثرب
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:38:20+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
mapman44 (2020-03-03 18:50:02+00:00): Hello, ludmilamykalyuk. Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. Outlines for buildings should be just for the structure itself, not the entire property. Please correct this one and it's also a good practice to add the address, opening hours and other information that would be helpful for customers. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81719205
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 13:44:39+00:00): لماذا تم حذف الفرشة:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12sb
mmkotibi (2021-01-16 13:54:49+00:00): لماذا تم حذف الفرشه وهي من المعالم الكبرى في شبه الجزيرة العربية ومصب فحول الاودية الرئيسية شرق المرتفعات
Jrachi (2020-12-18 08:02:24+00:00): Ciao.
Vedo che hai iniziato a mappare!
Bene però dovresti correggere questi errori di gioventù: non hai connesso le strade che hai inserito con quelle già esistenti.
Paolo Benazzo (2020-12-18 11:03:11+00:00): Sì sono un neofita (anche se vecchio d'età) ... puoi darmi una indicazione più precisa dei collegamenti mancanti?
Comunque qualcosa ho già corretto.
Jrachi (2020-12-18 12:06:20+00:00): L'età non conta. Io ho fatto 60 pochi giorni fa.
Mi sono accorto che avevi fatto qualche correzione. Stavo ancora lavorando in zona per inserire la relazione di un percorso a catasto regionale. Ed al caricamento mi ha segnalato un (piccolo) conflitto: un nodo che avevo spostato e tu lo avevi rispostato.
Benissimo vuol dire che sei attivo!
Visto che hai un numero limitato di change, ti consiglierei di prendere la zona dove hai mappato e scaricare i dati.
Poi lancia il validatore di Josm. Ti proporrà una marea di anomalie. Guarda quello che sei in grado di sistemare. Non saranno tutti errori tuoi, ma correggendo si impara!
Per qualunque cosa sentiti libero di contattarmi, invia un messaggio dalla mia pagina utente:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jrachi
user_5359 (2020-03-03 17:32:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
DemoLogin (2020-03-03 18:00:40+00:00): В чём заключается исправление?
DemoLogin (2020-03-03 19:12:32+00:00): Нашёл ошибки: на велопешеходных дорожках пропали теги, указывающие, что это действительно велопешеходные дорожки.
Внимательнее надо быть.
Исправьте пожалуйста и отпишитесь по готовности.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697650162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616157098
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/618094818
DemoLogin (2020-03-03 19:12:41+00:00): Возможно есть и другие ошибки.
Константин Гам (2020-03-03 20:52:18+00:00): Я специально из удалил, так как сделав звонок в ГИБДД я узнал что знаки установлены незаконно. Кто их установил устанавливается и принимается решения о демонтаже
DemoLogin (2020-03-04 14:40:27+00:00): За дорожные знаки отвечает "Комитет по дорожному хозяйству Ленинградской области", а не ГИБДД.
Незаконность установки (которая так понимаю ещё не доказана, а могут в итоге и согласовать), не отменяет их значимости - на примере вам ГИБДД сначала выпишет штраф, а уж потом вы будете обжаловать его незаконность.

Учитывая вероятность как положительного так и отрицательного исхода решения по знакам - оставить их до фактического демонтажа.
Тем более, что вы регулярно здесь бываете.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:48:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
user_5359 (2020-03-05 05:04:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short hint: the correct writing of the indoor key is with two o.
EditConscript (2020-03-05 09:05:33+00:00): test, is this comment visible to the public? are my edits in full view of others just like wikipedia? (⊙ˍ⊙)

wie geht es Ihr?
BCNorwich (2020-03-03 10:18:28+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I can't see that building on any imagery. If it is a fictional test could you please remove it?

Regards Bernard.
DaveF (2020-03-22 22:35:01+00:00): Hi
I think your edit broke The Cotswold Way relation in a couple places. Could you take a look at it please (The blue markers in the middle)

http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=65239

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=81720828

Do you know if the route is accurate, as signed on the ground? Google show it heading along the bridleway you created.
AJW92 (2020-03-23 14:10:30+00:00): Hi,
Apologies, I'll fix that this afternoon. 

Regarding the route location, I'll check the information we have and, providing its OSM compatible, amend if needed.

Cheers,
Andy
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:38:22+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
eggie (2020-03-03 11:47:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. Je "pad" was getagd als een onverplicht fietspad met moped en mofa=no
Je hebt er een wandelpad van gemaakt (met nu overbodige tags voor die tweewielers.) Welk bord staat vooraan?
Iets is een wandelpad als er dat blauwe bord staat met de wandelaar met kind. Staat er een bord "fietspad" G13, G11 of G12a  dan iets als fietspad taggen.
Staat er niets dan is het een highway=path.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-03 12:01:30+00:00): Een slingerhek maak je vast aan het pad op een node (knoop) en tag je met barrier=cycle_barrier
eggie (2020-03-03 12:07:19+00:00): 'k Denk dat highway=footway wel realistisch is. moped en mofa=  no kun je verwijderen. Dat is  "no" per default. 
Gr Eggie
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-05 01:16:22+00:00): Hi Abruzzzo, 
as discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80386313
re-reverting with a day without clarification is not a good idea. 
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-05 01:05:57+00:00): Why did you delete the wastewater plant just to expand it?
Why did you delete the pylon still visible in the images you cite?
eggie (2020-03-03 12:53:51+00:00): lanes=1 is meer iets voor op en afritten. 
maxspeed=15 hoort bij een woonerf.,  Zijn dit wellicht woonerven? 
Dan is de tag highway=livingstreet  
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-03 13:02:54+00:00): typo... =living_street
Hjart (2020-03-03 11:33:26+00:00): Please note that I've reverted this change, since there was no obvious reason for it
ma-rt-in (2020-03-04 13:36:14+00:00): Hallo,
wohher stammt das ref an der Haltestelle. Vor Ort kann man das ja nicht finden.
vg