piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-01-11 20:06:54+00:00): Je kunt beter even wachten tot het er echt ligt. Leisure=park zeker niet. 
Definitie van een park.
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse
Dus Leisure park weg. Wel bv landuse=grass en de playground daarin als vlak of als node.
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-11 20:02:34+00:00): Helaas  :)

gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend. Op het moment dat de bouw is gestart kun je het laten importeren vanuit het Kadaster via het forum. Je doet dan een verzoek in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. 
Doe je dat zelf? 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog identiek aan OSM account met wat vertraging wegens een eerste accountcheck.
Doe je het zelf?
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-11 20:24:10+00:00): Voorlopig omgezet in landuse = construction
eggie (2019-01-11 21:25:09+00:00): Verzoek staat op forum
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=733420#p733420
eggie (2019-01-12 09:33:12+00:00): Is inmiddels geïmporteerd
eggie (2019-01-11 19:58:08+00:00): Oke.. Jumbo Boere is niet de naam van het gebouw, maar hoort alleen op de adresnode. 
We taggen dus nooit namen op gebouwen, behalve bij kerken en paleizen e.d. 
Dus svp weer weghalen. Boere kun je wel toevoegen aan de adresnode.
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-11 20:04:28+00:00): Het staat al in de BAG dus je kunt laten importeren. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=rijsenburgerweg&resultOffset=0&objectId=1783100000714220&geometry.x=74839.555&geometry.y=448707.294&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=

Zet dan deze link erbij https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66236228#map=19/52.02195/4.21789 op ons forum.
eggie (2019-01-11 20:22:06+00:00): Dit commentaar hoort dus bij het apartementencomplex. Met deze link https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66236228#map=19/52.02126/4.22007
eggie (2019-01-11 19:42:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-01-11 19:46:19+00:00): Dag John,  Begin nooit met  access=no  Dat is een totaalverbod voor iedereen. art. 461. Het pad heft ook nog geen verbinding met het Vrijerslaantje emn zal dus niet roteren.
incline en hiking zijn alleen interessant voor bergpaden en hier niet van toepassing.
Verder hoeft foot-yes niet op een voetpad. 
Kijk je nog even?
Dit was je edit. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66236282
MVG,
Eggie
Martin Borsje (2019-01-11 21:33:44+00:00): Is het voetpad bovendien niet verbonden met het Vrijerslaantje?
eggie (2019-01-11 21:45:37+00:00): aangepast mbv bgt omtrekgericht.. verbinding gemaakt en onnodige tags verwijderd
MVG,
Eggie
kartonage (2019-01-12 02:23:30+00:00): Hallo Leopold Bloom, danke für die Eintragungen.

Bei den Öffnungszeiten wäre es gut, sich an die übliche OSM-Syntax zu halten. Dadurch macht sich das ganze weitaus besser auswertbar für alle. In dem Fall hier wäre es also "Mo-Fr 07:00-18:00; Sa 09:00-12:00". Danke!
//
Genau dokumentiert findest du dazu hier einiges: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours und testen der Öffnungszeiten kannst du mit diesem Tool: http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?setLng=de

Falls du noch Fragen hast, gern nachhaken.

Schöne Grüße
viloan (2019-01-11 19:22:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jirislaby (2019-02-08 14:04:28+00:00): Tak zrovna tyto cesty byly podle skutecnosti...
605801850, v2
605801849, v2
605801848, v2
605801847, v2

A ty pridane budovy 662472283, 662472284 a 662472282 tam realne vubec nejsou.

Proc menite neco, co puvodne bylo spravne?
Mar4s (2019-02-08 14:46:51+00:00): Ahoj, předtím to správně rozhodně nebylo. Chyběla tam například budova stavebnin a bylo tam několik menších. Areál jsem nemapoval nějak detailně, Víceméně jsem šel okolo a koukal přes plot po cestě do Hangáru, doma pak dodělal po paměti. Pár věcí jsem dopřídával podle sourců v popisu changestu. Každopádně jsetli máš lepší informace, klidně to oprav. Na příklady se bohužel nekouknu, protože smazané věci neuvidím :-(
jirislaby (2019-02-08 14:53:54+00:00): Ahoj, ta budova tam nebyla, protoze jsem cekal na katastr, az ji zanesou, coz se za ty roky, co DEK funguje, nestalo. Nevim, jestli nemaji zkolaudovano, ale ty budovy jsou trochu jinak -- ty zadni smerem od silnice sly davno k zemi, ta vepredu je uptrostred jenom strecha se dvema budovami po bocich (sklad a obchod). Proto je tam ta cesta skrz.

Ty smazane cesty uz jsem taky revertnul a zbytek pospravoval, jezdim tam nakupovat casto.
Mar4s (2019-02-08 15:02:29+00:00): Supr, díky za opravy. Chybám se prostě vždycky vyhnout nedá :-( Koukal jsem pro jistotu i na satelitní snímky a máš pravdu. Změny v katastru nejsou, takže to vypadá, že stavba a příp. demolice byly načerno...
viloan (2019-01-11 19:38:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
katpatuka (2021-12-05 13:09:40+00:00): Merhaba penom, Konya Ereğli'nin 3 mahallenin sınırları eksik kalmış: Bulgurluk , Acıpınar ve Beyköy. Devamı var mı? Kaynak var mı?
penom (2021-12-06 21:22:33+00:00): Merhaba,
Evet yarım kalmış, şu adresden yararlanmıştım; 
https://kentrehberi.konya.bel.tr/#/rehber/
abakus_uploader (2019-01-11 23:30:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
DaveF (2019-01-12 15:03:09+00:00): Hi Tim
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/192467#map=18/50.99756/-1.48557

Please note you've extended the NCN 24 route relation ito the cul-de-sac. Could you plit & remove please.
Tim Ellison (2019-01-12 16:28:30+00:00): Eek, sorry, thanks for catching that Dave.
Corrected, pls check that is now as expected.
DaveF (2019-01-12 16:34:56+00:00): Looks good. Thanks
Are you local? if so, Would you be able to check for any NCN signage south of the station & on Eastwards? It would be great if the NCN could be joined up at this location.
Tim Ellison (2019-01-12 16:39:21+00:00): Yes I am local, and yes I will be happy to check for NCN signage near Malmesbury Rd at some point when I have time (and daylight).
DaveF (2019-01-12 16:44:24+00:00): Thank you.
tux67 (2019-01-13 16:13:09+00:00): Kleiner Hinweis .. du hattest hier scheinbar einen Tippfehler der hier korregiert wurde:
Schau mal in deine Konfig:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66271474
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66237523
user_3022894 (2019-07-18 16:44:35+00:00): Hi schnism,
ich wollte nur fragen, ob du an der Franckestraße vor Ort warst. Weil ich meine, dass mindestens dieses Stück der Franckestraße hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30067835 verkehrsberuhigter Bereich ist, also nicht Zone 30. Hab' da nämlich so ein Schild gesehen. Oder mich geirrt? Hmm… Viele Grüße, Lukas
schnism (2019-07-18 21:40:24+00:00): Hallo! Ich bin nur einmal komplett außen rum gewandert, um zu schauen, wo die Zone 30 anfängt bzw. aufhört. Ob in der Mitte noch ein verkehrsberuhigter Bereich liegt, kann ich nicht sicher ausschließen. Ich wohne aber in der Nähe und schaue mal nach. Danke für den Hinweis.
user_3022894 (2019-07-19 14:45:50+00:00): Hi! Ja super, alles klar. Dann bis dann mal und viele Grüße.
schnism (2019-07-21 21:17:33+00:00): So, war gerade da, das ist tatsächlich eine "Spielstraße". Danke für den Hinweis!
nmsl🤣 (2019-01-15 15:13:49+00:00): thanks
eggie (2019-01-11 21:41:35+00:00): 'k Heb het gewoon aangepast naar landuse=grass met een node met Leisure=playground. Survey natuurlijk wel tzt nodig.
pberzins (2019-01-11 21:07:25+00:00): Incorrect comment: Added a parking area with service road, and parking aisle.
ajf3934221 (2019-01-13 20:40:03+00:00): Hallo Tschaeck, 
vielen Dank dass Du Dich um den Verlauf der Steinlach kümmerst. Mir ist aufgefallen dass Du den Bach an einigen Stellen an Maps4BW ausgerichtet hast, wo er nach relativ aktuellen Sattelitenaufnahmen anders verläuft (wie ursprünglich). Maps4BW ist vor allem für die Hausumrisse extrem genau, z.B. Waldwege oder Gewässerverläufe können jedoch erheblich vom aktuellen Zustand differieren da die Daten in Maps4BW teilweise mit sehr großer Latenz aktualisiert werden. Bitte prüfe daher nochmal unter Zuhilfenahme von ausgerichteten Sattelitenaufnahmen ob der Gewässerverlauf so stimmt.  
Grüße, 
Andy
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66239044
Tschaeck (2019-01-14 16:52:14+00:00): Hallo Andy,

ich habe das Changeset rückgängig gemacht. Es ist halt doch nicht so gut, ohne Ortskenntnis so etwas zu machen und darauf vertrauen, dass die amtlichen Kartendaten aktuell sind. 

Schöne Grüße
Tschaeck
ajf3934221 (2019-01-14 16:56:33+00:00): Servus Tschaeck, 

vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Respekt für Deine Entscheidung das CS rückgängig zu machen. 

Wenn Du irgendwelche Fragen zum Thema GPS hast oder auch einen Weg den man mal genau aufnehmen sollte dann melde dich gerne jederzeit. 

Weiterhin frohes Mappen!!!

Grüße 
Andy
CmdrThor (2019-01-13 05:34:24+00:00): Just to let you know, you typo'd Medical in Medical Building 2 as 'Mesical'.
localfixerupper (2019-01-13 18:33:56+00:00): Yes I did.  I noticed it and fixed it before I got your message.  I try to double check my work. But thanks for calling it to my attention.  I'm relatively new at this and I do try to be careful, but I'm just as human as anyone else I guess.
I've seen a lot of your work.  You do good stuff!
CmdrThor (2019-01-14 08:11:41+00:00): You're quite welcome. I try to keep an eye on new members in the area to see if I need to give pointers or suggestions (Or make corrections), but you seem to have a pretty good handle on everything. A simple typo is a nice change from having to message someone after their 2nd changeset to tell them that they deleted a major road, lol. So keep up the good work.

Just about all of the improvements in St. Charles county have been done by me, so it's hard not to see what I've done, lol. But I appreciate the compliment.

Feel free to shoot me a message in the future if you have any questions or need help with anything. My inbox is always open.
localfixerupper (2019-01-15 01:36:49+00:00): Well I can sure see why you like to keep an eye on things.  You have obviously put a lot of hard work into this and you don't want it messed up.
I appreciate the offer.  I did some work on the lowe's at Zumbehl.  I did the exit onto Clay with some turning lanes.  If you get a chance would you check that and tell me if that work complies with conventions?  In the meantime, I'll try not to delete any major roads. lol
CmdrThor (2019-01-16 05:31:37+00:00): Lowe's looks fine to me except for one small issue: on the contractor loading roof the driveway that goes underneath it is not connected to the roof on the north side. The node where a way transitions from covered=yes to not covered should always be connected to the building. (The south side is correctly done)

Also, my personal preference is to tag the building though, but that's just me. You can find multiple arguments for or against tagging the building vs tagging a point within the building. So feel free to keep tagging POI's as single points if you prefer.

The turn lanes look good to me. You have the correct number and they're facing the right direction which is what's important, lol.
localfixerupper (2019-01-16 16:53:15+00:00): Thanks again.  I think it's attached now.
Tagging the building is my preference also.  But someone else had already put the point there without drawing the building, and I hate to change someone else's work unless it's a safety issue, and I know that it's frowned upon to have both labels for the same thing.  But if it's okay, I'll go ahead and merge the point into the building from now on.  Only thing is, point labels seem to get rendered better than building labels on the nav app that I use, but maybe that's just particular with their  renderer.  I'll go ahead and keep tagging the buildings.  Thanks again
waldviertlerkartograph (2019-04-01 09:28:02+00:00): Hallo!
Was hat es mit diesem Pfeil (railway=dissused) beim Kabelbüre (Flurschützstraße, Ecke Böckhgasse) auf sich? Hat der eine spezielle Bedeutung?
AlbertCohen (2019-04-02 08:27:23+00:00): Was für ein Pfeil?
Das sind alte Schienestränge, die nicht mehr benutzt werden.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 20:01:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3377928

Can you look at this note? Maybe you can help with it even if plenty of time since the edit (if not - then I wish you a happy mapping!)
muralito (2019-01-14 17:16:00+00:00): Cambio revertido por vandalismo.
muralito (2019-01-14 17:14:40+00:00): Cambio revertido por vandalismo.
sarxos (2019-01-11 22:23:23+00:00): Plus poprawki w geometrii budynkow przy ul. Uroczej.
awesm (2019-01-23 08:50:27+00:00): What's your source for this name? This sounds more like a sign pointing to where the marina is accessed rather than a name.
andrew_dc (2019-01-24 04:25:59+00:00): This came from the LINZ streets dataset (see https://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/3462)
awesm (2019-01-24 05:07:55+00:00): Thanks. That link doesn't take me to the exact location but no reason to doubt you :)

However you should probably add a source tag. I am still doubtful about this as a "name" (LINZ isn't perfect) and will check out the signage very soon since it is near my house.
andrew_dc (2019-01-24 05:54:10+00:00): Nothing beats feet on the ground knowledge! :)
chachafish (2019-02-02 13:33:11+00:00): Hello Ferchino83, in this changeset you have deleted traffic signals and added junction=yes incorrectly. Can you please correct these errors? Thank you
viloan (2019-01-11 22:44:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Soul Systems (2019-01-11 22:56:13+00:00): Obrigado.
SomeoneElse (2019-01-13 13:51:46+00:00): Hello, 
You've re-added the motorway junction here.  Of the sources that you've listed ("local knowledge;aerial imagery;streetlevel imagery;gps"), the only one that might be valid is "local knowledge".  
Previously you've added imaginary data to OSM and it has been removed.  How can you demonstrate that this data is not imaginary and is in fact correct?
Please do reply with something that can be used to back up these changes; if we hear nothing we'll have to remove them.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
qsjhasdhhfdshyudij (2019-01-13 13:55:54+00:00): Hello Andy,
In regards to my fictional mapping, I have found a new place, So I will not be inserting fictional mapping into OSM anymore.
I only changed this edit because it was very chunky before, So I decided to smooth it out.
If you have any other questions, message me.
Thanks.
SomeoneElse (2019-01-13 14:26:00+00:00): Ah - it does look as if this motorway junction was added before (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365705898/history ) but because you deleted and redrew it it looked like you'd added it from scratch.
qsjhasdhhfdshyudij (2019-01-13 14:33:17+00:00): Yes, I just smoothed it out so it matched the interchanges later into the freeway. It was just a bit too chunky. That's all.
azakh-world (2019-01-12 18:13:50+00:00): Hello. When you create a subway platform and add it to a route=subway relation, please also add them into corresponding public_transport=stop_area relation with 'platform' role. Or don't add them to route relations at all. You make mistakes faster than I could repair them. Please read wiki on Public Transport mapping, especially https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping

Thank you,
Alexey
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-03-29 15:09:37+00:00): Hello. I have created several stop areas to make it easier to add objects in the future.I hope these problems are reduced over time. By the way, I've added more routes like Saitama or Toyo subway and validated with JOSM.
azakh-world (2019-03-29 16:03:56+00:00): It's great. Tokyo metro is already rendered in our application and routing is working on it (see my profile if interested). As OSM subway data grows in coverage and quality, more users will get interested in its filling and support. But at present the subway data in OSM is not always correct and reliable: partially because of users' incompetence, partially because of absence of unified tagging scheme. Time revealed that PTv2 is too complicated and now users tend to refuse some of its concepts (e.g., https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refined_Public_Transport). One of the most controversial thing is stop_position. Station is sufficient, in most cases stop position may be easily found by projecting station point onto rails. In this view, maybe you consider not to spend your effort on creating stop_positions at each station. I have to sort stops and platforms in route relations after each your activity :)
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-04-04 18:11:40+00:00): I understand. I still do not know what the stop_position really is for. I hope there is a better consensus to improve public transport routes.
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-04-04 18:38:06+00:00): I work in add new routes for Tokyo Metropiltan City. Also, I made some issue requests in the Github repository about those routes. If I did not do it right, I'm sorry. Although it is fun to add more routes and take advantage of the fast public transport system. Greetings. - Diego
https://github.com/mapsme/subways/issues
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-04-04 18:39:08+00:00): PS: https://github.com/mapsme/subways/issues/61
nplath (2019-01-14 18:47:17+00:00): Hi Henk,

a solar farm is tagged as power=generator unless individual solar panels are mapped (like in this example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192932181 )

Here is an Overpass query which shows solar farms with power=generator in green and solar farms with your private tagging scheme in red: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/FdE
You will notice that in every country of the earth except for the Netherlands power=generator prevails.

Kind regards
user_3216889 (2019-01-14 19:30:35+00:00): Hi nplath, 

power=plant is correct according to an accepted proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_generation_refinement

See also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dgenerator#History

With regards,
Henk
Harald Hartmann (2019-01-15 20:15:08+00:00): @nplath: even it prevails it hasn't to be correct. An area bigger than one solar panel module and/or consists of more than one panel then it's a power=plant. If you want some micromapping you could map each solar panel with power=generator.
cpu20 (2019-06-22 07:54:22+00:00): The Geo Langiestraat and Gabriel Celisstraat were mistakenly renamed to Camille D'havestraat.
Can this be reverted?
SomeoneElse (2019-01-18 05:05:46+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain why you changed the status here?  According to a later edit at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76467525/history it's still closed.
Best Regards,
Andy
abakus_uploader (2019-01-12 23:30:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ma-rt-in (2019-03-31 13:48:58+00:00): Hallo,
gibt es i-wo eine präsenz der Ärtze im Web? Auf verschiedenen Seiten kann ich weder mit der Telefonnumer noch mit den Namen der Ärzte jemanden finden.
vg
LeBleu (2019-03-31 14:22:44+00:00): Ich bin dort Patient.
Und unten neben der Haustür stehen die meisten Daten auch.
Somit zuverlässige Info!
Gruß Peter
LeBleu (2019-03-31 14:26:15+00:00): Google-Suche: trotha Eppendorfer Weg
reicht, um den Wechsel nachvollziehen zu können!
Peter

https://www.google.de/search?source=hp&ei=V82gXKGnFY-Vk74Pw5CwuAs&q=trotha+eppendorfer+weg&oq=trotha+eppe&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-hp.1.0.0i22i30l2j33i160.3882.18337..19576...0.0..0.257.1497.0j10j1......0....1.......1..41j46i131i275j0i131j0j46i131j46j46i275.Ch0NAAHKORo