piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
naveenpf (2020-09-22 10:29:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90318039
ovruni (2020-09-02 18:22:00+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que se han agregado manzanas con la etiqueta building=house [0], sin embargo esta etiqueta esta destinada para edificaciones individuales, para manzanas puede utilizar la etiqueta place=city_block [1], además el uso de nombre "MANZANA", al ser descriptivo [2] es desaconsejado.
Si tiene cualquier consulta sobre como editar puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://telegram.me/osmPe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building%3Dhouse
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Dcity_block
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
user_5359 (2020-09-02 19:33:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the booth tags
Grado de protección=parcial
Propietario=Efrain Bastidas
?
Zol87 (2020-10-04 07:20:24+00:00): The Train stops are not named by car numbers. This will mess up every system that lists the stops in order. Please do not edit like this.
Zol87 (2020-10-04 07:22:13+00:00): Unlike Metra, The CTA has set stopping positions regardless of car length so the front car is always in the same spot.
luk452 (2021-12-26 11:05:42+00:00): The category of this as a pedestrian-only space is inaccurate. Bikes, electric vehicles, permitted vehicles can ride here. Marking this as a pedestrian space causes problems on apps using the OSM data, as the space is interpreted as inaccessible for bikes.
mueschel (2020-09-03 16:13:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
felipeeugenio (2020-09-30 13:29:16+00:00): Estimado
el tag building es para estructuras. No para el recinto completo.
saludos
skyper (2020-09-03 11:07:36+00:00): Hi

Where is the identification that this is a Amazon logistic Edit?

Where is the #hashtag of the task?

Where is the ground source as stated in the wiki?

Reviewer?

Chears skyper
harinikh (2020-09-07 09:00:20+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. as mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935. Our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can you let me know what is the ground source mentioned in the comment I didn’t get it. always happy to learn from the community.
Carnildo (2020-09-03 06:51:05+00:00): There are better ways to move a building than deleting it and re-drawing it.  You can right-click on it and select "move", or you can click on it and drag the corners around as needed.
skquinn (2020-09-04 08:16:10+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

This section of roadway is not a bridge. Please do not tag features that do not exist.
mueschel (2020-09-03 16:14:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
literan (2020-09-10 11:04:28+00:00): зачем статус дороги Ельня - М7 снизили? там идет основной межрегиональный грузовой трафик в обход Ногинска. Откачу. Не надо произвольно, без обоснования  менять статусы дорог, тем более основных - они давно устоялись
ndm (2020-09-02 21:53:58+00:00): Adding descriptions as "names" isn't generally done in OSM.
pio2_122 (2020-09-03 14:20:55+00:00): Wycofane - te POI były już oznaczone na mapie.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90319899
gurglypipe (2020-09-03 08:35:56+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edit. Unfortunately you accidentally marked a large section of the canal towpath as being in a tunnel. :) I’m not sure what your aim was, but I’ve undone those changes and fixed one spot where the canal towpath was crossing the canal south of Ratcliffe Wharfe Lane. :)
SimonTom (2020-09-03 11:43:15+00:00): Thanks.
I was trying to correct someone's else's mistake with the towpath, tunnel & bridge.
I thought it didn't look right at the time but couldn't work out what! 😊
gurglypipe (2020-09-03 11:45:41+00:00): Cool, hope it looks correct to you now. Happy editing :)
Pollux17 (2020-09-19 13:52:54+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro che alcune aggiunte di tag siano necessarie?
description contiene la difficoltà ma è già presente, e le durate possono essere inserite in tag appositi (duration:forward e backward); network type è probabilmente superfluo avendo già network=lwn

Un elenco completo di tag si trova qui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=CAI&vesection=8#Percorsi_escursionistici
amadvance (2020-09-19 15:31:50+00:00): Ciao. la descrizione la metto per facilitare la fruizione delle informazioni. Di fatto molti siti mostrano la descrizione, ma non altri campi. E spesso per persone non avvezze alla tecnologia una descrizione più esplicita aiuta. La documentazione ufficiale è molto "libera" per questo campo, parla di generiche informazioni. Comunque se è un problema posso fare a meno di metterla.
Per duration hai ragione. Ha senso usare anche i  tag specifici.
Per network type, lo metto semplicemente perché l'editor online lo chiede. Anche a me sembra superfluo. Farò a meno di metterlo.

Ciao!
Pollux17 (2020-09-20 14:48:07+00:00): In effetti una descrizione non fa mai male, alcune scelte sono difficili tra il "don't map for the renderer" e l'uso effettivo...
Comunque bel lavoro su tutte le relazioni dei sentieri!
Ciao
osmviborg (2020-09-03 05:12:28+00:00): Hej. 
'temporary:access' er forkert, se her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary 'Conditional restrictions' er det du skal bruge https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
Langlaeufer (2022-06-20 14:29:40+00:00): Hallo Basstoelpel,

du hast die Oberfläche von Weg 27417001 (https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/27417001) in compacted geändert. Ich erinnere mich dass hier früher Asphalt war. Hat sich das tatsächlich geändert.  Ich frage, weil das jemand wieder auf grade1 gesetzt hat.
Basstoelpel (2022-06-24 16:25:45+00:00): Vermutlich hat der Weg nicht durchgehend die gleiche Beschaffenheit. Wenn ich mich richtig  erinnere, bin ich nur den westlichsten Abschnitt gefahren und habe dann fälschlich den ganzen Weg geändert.
eggie (2020-09-02 21:33:42+00:00): Welkom bij OSM ,
Dit is geen officiële drinkgelegenheid, staat niet bij de KvK bekend en hoort daarom niet in OSM thuis Je bijdrage wordt verwijderd.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-02 21:35:04+00:00): reverted by changeset #90324133
AkuAnakTimur (2020-09-03 14:22:24+00:00): You sure this should be mapped as a trunk link? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453657110
TommyLanez (2020-09-03 21:23:48+00:00): Hello AkuAnakTimur, thank you for the message. I have removed the trunk link from the market polygon.
Cascafico (2020-09-03 19:07:06+00:00): perchè hai cancellato la palestra Boxing Club Trieste?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90321459
highflyer74 (2020-09-03 07:23:15+00:00): Ich schon wieder :-)

Bitte beachte, dass diese Einrichtung bereits an einer Fläche erfasst ist (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284909514). 

Schau Dir bitte immer genau an, ob Dinge bereits als Node, Way oder Relation bestehen, damit wir nichts doppelt erfassen.

Sei mir nicht böse, wenn ich die von Dir am Gebäude hinzugefügten Daten wieder entferne.
GITNE (2020-09-02 22:49:43+00:00): Why did you transfer amenities from nodes onto building ways? Buildings can have multiple amenities. Please look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838150437. Do not transfer amenities onto building ways unless a building houses exclusively only one amenity. Please revert your edits where you have done so.
GITNE (2020-09-04 12:48:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40478031 is another example where multiple amenities are housed in one building. Multiple amenities in one building should be mapped either with multiple nodes inside a building outline or with relations of type `multipolygon` referencing the building in the `outer` role.
GITNE (2020-09-04 13:10:47+00:00): You have deleted amenity nodes here too which are co-located in the same building.
woodpeck (2020-09-04 13:40:52+00:00): I have reverted these edits now. It is not clear what the intention was but clearly the execution was problematic. An edit of this magnitude should potentially also be discussed with the community in advance; I am doubtful that the community would agree to the blanket merging of POIs with their containing buildings.
marc__marc (2020-11-28 23:43:47+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7869559015
êtes-vous sur de la rue ?
car il n'y a pas de rue de ce nom renseigné dans osm à cet endroit et la poste dit que c'est "1 RUE DE COMMERCE" mais positionne le bureau un peu plus à l'est. du coup c'est pas clair si le bureau a bougé ou s'il y a une erreur de rue.
dans le doute j'ai supprimé le nom de la rue, n'hésitez pas à nomer la rue si vous avez l'info.
par ailleurs vous avez nomé le bureau de poste "Banque postale", est-ce que c'est parce que c'est un bureau + service de la banque postale ? ou que la banque ?
highflyer74 (2020-09-03 07:09:30+00:00): Moin :-)

Denke daran, dass viele Dinge in OSM bereits standardmässig verhindern, dass etwas irgendwo durchgeroutet wird. Deshalb ist es oft nicht notwendig, alle möglichen Tags an Objekte zu hängen.

Allein schon dadurch, dass es sich hier um einen Fussweg handelt, wird hier kein Motorfahrzeug durchfahren.

Versuche bitte immer, nur so wenig Tags wie möglich und so viele wie nötig zu setzen. Eine Übersicht über die verschiedenen Möglichkeiten gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Die Standardannahmen für Wege in Deutschland (also das, was NICHT extra erfasst werden muss) findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Was auch einige nicht wissen: highway=footway wird nur für Wege verwendet, die das blaue Fussweg-Schild tragen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway). Wenn nicht, nimmt man highway=path.

Viele Grüße!
Glassman (2020-09-02 20:26:43+00:00): Thanks for the improvements in the light rail lines.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90322009
GITNE (2020-09-08 15:04:13+00:00): Can you please give a more verbose description of what you have done in this changeset or what was the purpose of it? After reviewing your other recent changesets we have to conclude that your descriptions are actually non-descriptive. “Portland”, “Salisbury”, or “Temple, TX” are not descriptions. For example, you have transitioned buildings in the OSM life cycle in this changeset. How can you be sure the buildings do not exist anymore? If you have done this based on imagery please make sure that perform modifications based on the latest imagery or survey.

Since judging by the count of your commits, you are a new mapper, please refrain from modifying the map for now. Please add new map data instead to learn the basics first.
ke9tv (2020-10-25 19:01:10+00:00): This changeset appears to have retagged Blue Mountain WIld Forest as 'Essex Chain of Lakes Parking' and made it a parking field. (It also disconnected the multipolygon.) I restored the multipolygon with its correct tagging, but I have no idea what, if anything, you intended to tag as a parking area, so you might want to try to re-enter that piece.
James Maughan (2020-10-26 12:25:07+00:00): Thanks for fixing. I knew I was having trouble there but thought I had straightened it out before saving.
I realize I should probably have made an area and then tagged that as the parking lot.
I'm trying to clarify that the parking for canoe access is a good bit away from the water.
kartonage (2020-09-03 14:40:35+00:00): Siehe Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83494620 -> entsprechend revertiert.
dgitto (2020-09-03 04:47:20+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
Warin61 (2021-05-21 00:16:57+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

The name tag is not for a description of something, like 'Tennis' for a tennis court. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Warin61 (2021-05-21 00:23:53+00:00): The area surrounding the netball and tennis courts is not a single pitch and would be better tagged a landuse=recreation_ground. 
The netball courts should be sport=netball. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dnetball
eggie (2020-09-02 21:39:44+00:00): Dolf.. Lijkt me aardig gelukt zo.
MVG,
eggie
Xuacu (2020-09-04 19:04:34+00:00): Los nombres oficiales de estos lugares, según la toponimia de Les Regueres y Oviedo/Uviéu, publicadas en el BOPA, son "L'Escampleru" y "Les Campes", respectivamente. Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323015
Cebderby (2020-09-12 12:11:31+00:00): The existing roads and buildings are (well, were) in excellent alignment.  The main "correction" you seem to have done here is to delete mapped features and move ways out of alignment.  (The Bing imagery is clearly out of alignment here).  Please fix or revert.
Cebderby (2020-09-16 09:38:35+00:00): No reply; reverted
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:37:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323120
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:58:18+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Les Regueres, publicada en el BOPA, es "Valdunu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323236
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:50:12+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Candamu, publicada en el BOPA, es "Cueru". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323359
user_5359 (2021-04-16 15:03:37+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the admin_level=1? The tag admin_level=2 is reserved for a country, so admin_level=1 is normally a continent.
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:47:29+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Llanera, publicada en el BOPA, es "Tuernes El Pequeñu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323416
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:43:39+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Llanera, publicada en el BOPA, es "La Venta'l Gallo". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323455
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:38:43+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Oviedo/Uviéu, publicada en el BOPA, es "El Caleyu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323475
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:35:50+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Mieres, publicada en el BOPA, es "Ablaña Baxo". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323524
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:33:01+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Mieres, publicada en el BOPA, es "Returbiu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323543
eggie (2020-09-02 21:44:33+00:00): Dag KKC.. je hebt er later een playground van gemaakt en dat lijkt me correct. Meestal hebben die geen naam. Heet het echt officieel Speelplaats Parkhoven?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-02 21:46:19+00:00): Meestal hebben die speelplaatsen geen officiële naam. Wanneer dat zo is kan de naam er beter af.
Up to you!
MVG,
Eggie
KKC1983 (2020-09-03 06:09:38+00:00): Vanuit de gemeente is er na realisatie gecommuniceerd als "Speelschip Parkhoven" en "Speelplek Parkhoven"
eggie (2020-09-03 06:10:43+00:00): Oke...duidelijk.
Gr eggie
Xuacu (2020-09-04 19:09:14+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Nava, publicada en el BOPA, es "L'Empalme". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323663
Xuacu (2020-09-04 18:21:20+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Nava, publicada en el BOPA, es "Ceceda/Cecea". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323722
Xuacu (2020-09-04 19:12:34+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Piloña, publicada en el BOPA, es "L'infiestu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323844
Xuacu (2020-09-04 19:22:38+00:00): Fresnadillo es un nombre ficticio que el lugar jamás tuvo ni en épocas anteriores. El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Nava publicada en el BOPA, es "Fresnadiellu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada, y mucho menos, inventada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323978
Xuacu (2020-09-04 19:25:29+00:00): Lo mismo respecto a Brañavieya
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90323978
user_5359 (2020-09-03 05:04:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short hint: The key opening_hours and the equal sign isn't part of the value (and you added some additional characters at the end).
harmsway14 (2020-09-03 05:07:24+00:00): Thank you
Xuacu (2020-09-04 19:38:27+00:00): Llames de abajo es un nombre ficticio que el lugar jamás tuvo ni en épocas anteriores. El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Nava publicada en el BOPA, es "Llames de Baxu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada, y mucho menos, inventada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324036
Xuacu (2020-09-04 19:43:02+00:00): Llames de Arriba es un nombre ficticio que el lugar jamás tuvo ni en épocas anteriores. El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Nava publicada en el BOPA, es "Llames de Riba". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada, y mucho menos, inventada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324047
Xuacu (2020-09-04 19:47:34+00:00): Acedo es un nombre ficticio que el lugar jamás tuvo ni en épocas anteriores. El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Sariego publicada en el BOPA, es "Acéu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada, y mucho menos, inventada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324070
Xuacu (2020-09-04 19:55:11+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Ribeseya publicada en el BOPA, es "Camangu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324108
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 00:08:50+00:00): There now appears to be a big gap in the SP35 road?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_11740352 (2020-09-05 09:53:49+00:00): 1) speak in italian
2) corrected
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 10:46:12+00:00): Non c'è bisogno di essere scortese :)
Sto cercando di aiutarti qui. Cerco sempre di commentare in una lingua che è probabile che venga compresa dalla persona che contribuisce, ma https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/patata_revert contiene sia l'inglese che l'italiano
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:03:35+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Llanes publicada en el BOPA, es "Riegu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324239
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:06:35+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Llanes publicada en el BOPA, es "La Portiella". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324268
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:12:07+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Parres publicada en el BOPA, es "Torañu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324356
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:14:44+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Cangues d'Onís publicada en el BOPA, es "Triongu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324384
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:17:14+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Parres publicada en el BOPA, es "Sotu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324418
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:19:21+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Piloña publicada en el BOPA, es "Sebares". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324475
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:22:30+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Piloña publicada en el BOPA, es "L'Aguilera". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324503
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:27:08+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Piloña publicada en el BOPA, es "Samiguel". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324540
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:34:25+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Piloña publicada en el BOPA, es "Sotu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324603
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:31:58+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Piloña publicada en el BOPA, es "Espinaréu". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324645
Xuacu (2020-09-04 20:36:56+00:00): El nombre oficial de este lugar, según la toponimia de Piloña publicada en el BOPA, es "Rifabar". Por favor, evita usar toponimia anticuada
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90324678