piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-10-18 16:34:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53042825 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44565208].
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
5m4u9 (2016-12-22 21:43:58+00:00): hola, te faltó añadir la categoría al ginmasio... ya lo corregí.
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
Supaplex (2016-12-23 01:48:35+00:00): 請用正確的tag，修改道路通行限制
RicoElectrico (2016-12-27 20:23:30+00:00): Cześć. Dodałeś Osiedle Milano jako nazwę do punktów adresowych, co jest błędem.
Czy to nazwa nadana przez dewelopera, niewystępująca w adresach i oficjalnych dokumentach? Jeśli tak, to najlepiej po prostu obrysować obszar z tagiem landuse=residential i tam dodać nazwę. 
Myślę, że tak jest, bo inne adresy w tej wsi nie mają nazwy ulicy, tylko addr:place.
CRCulver (2019-04-19 17:20:11+00:00): I noticed that this change involves a mistake: the street here is not Rruga Thanas Mertiri but a continuation of Rruga Viktor Eftimiu. Furthermore, that exact same mistake is found in Google Maps. This seems an unlikely coincidence. Are you copying from Google Maps? That is strictly forbidden in OpenStreetMap. This is a serious matter, so please respond to this changeset comment. Otherwise, I will have to bring this up with the Data Working Group and discuss rolling back many (if not most) of your OSM edits.
Blues Brothers (2019-07-14 15:43:03+00:00): Hello CRCulver,

I'm sorry for writing now, but I haven't read messages for a long time.

I'm not copying from Google Maps as I don't like Google very much so I'm not using its apps. Normally I make some pictures and than mapping names on OpenStreetMap but for Albania names are  sometimes not named uniquely or street signs are placed not always easy to understand. Furthermore some years ago I noticed that it is Google Maps copying names and streets from OpenStreetMap. I had the experience that on Google Maps there was nothing mapped and after some time there appeared the same streets as on OpenStreetMaps.
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
RicoElectrico (2018-03-24 23:45:19+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za dodanie, choć myślę że dobór klasy drogi mógłby być lepszy.

Dałeś highway=track zamiast highway=residential z oznaczeniem powierzchni (surface=unpaved lub bardziej szczegółowo).
Reino Baptista (2017-02-23 18:29:11+00:00): Hi GreeceMapper!

You leaved a note saying:
Could someone explain this footway across water? Is this access=Jesus?

I Can. 
On low water tide there's passage. Maybe not all the way... but mostly part.
RB
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
DaveF (2016-12-22 16:35:22+00:00): Hi krishykrish 
Welcome to OSM. I made a couple of small tweaks to your house edits. The addresses were transferred from a node to the associated polygon, and using the 'make right angle' tool I made them into true rectangles. 
If you live there & have the time it would be great if some of the other houses could be added.added. Do you know if any of the roads marked as 'construction' are open yet?
krishykrish (2016-12-22 19:02:35+00:00): Yes. The roads are open. I shall add other houses too. Can I just check which services use OSM in their maps software?
Paul_012 (2018-02-26 17:52:48+00:00): I've reverted this edit, which made the maritime boundary nearly cut through the island of Pulau Jarak.
osmviborg (2016-12-22 15:32:27+00:00): Kilde: SDFE kortviser
ququruzka (2020-11-23 14:15:45+00:00): should not be used with russian languages in Ukraine. 
stop to do it again.
#ostanovite_dolboeba
Maturi0n (2020-11-23 19:20:20+00:00): Which object was tagged incorrectly?
Maturi0n (2020-11-23 19:25:54+00:00): Alright, found what you meant.
BCNorwich (2016-12-22 18:22:48+00:00): Hi just removed housename =1 as that is not the house name.
BCNorwich (2016-12-22 18:33:00+00:00): Added your post:postcode=E3 5GY onto the highway as postalcode=E3 5GY which is the correct way to add this information to a highway. Regards
bubix (2016-12-22 19:14:56+00:00): Ottimo lavoro! Posto a quanto pare poco conosciuto scovato grazie al progetto Open Cantieri del Comune di Lecce.
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:52:11+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
opendcc (2016-12-25 18:49:34+00:00): Hallo,

Bäume im Wald werden nicht einzeln getaggt. 

Viele Grüße
opendcc (2016-12-25 18:55:24+00:00): Das sind leider extrem viele Änderungen, die hier Korrektur brauchen (u.a. wurde eine Grenze rausgelöscht). Die Änderungen wurden mit JOSM erstellt, ich bitte Dich, das entsprechend den Mapping-Regeln im wiki anzupassen.

Servus Wolfgang
jc86035 (2016-12-23 06:48:55+00:00): Sorry for accidentally undoing this as well. In future, it would help to add the English name, as well as update the landuse around the building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449693730).
glibbertorsten (2017-01-08 23:17:45+00:00): Hallo! Ich bin beim Hinzufügen des Autohauses Biering http://biering-autohaus.de/index.php/filialen.html#karten darauf gestoßen, das die Hausnummer falsch ist. Auch der Ofenladen nebenan hat eine falsche Hausnummer - ist dir vielleicht was verrutscht?
marc__marc (2022-08-21 00:19:22+00:00): Bonjour,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461174958
je m'étonne des tags d'accès, il y a vraiement un panneau avec tout cela à cet endroitr ? particulièrement la combinaison de privé <> pas privé selon le type de véhicule m'interpelle
Cordialement,
Marc
Hjart (2016-12-22 18:54:00+00:00): Du har her justeret en sti (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460053974/history) nogle få m som jeg forinden havde justeret efter "Geodatastyrelsens" billeder (som efter min vurdering er særdeles velkalibrerede). Ikke fordi det nødvendigvis har stor betydning, men jeg kunne alligevel godt tænke mig at vide hvad du har justeret den efter.
ablansinger (2016-12-22 19:00:38+00:00): Har du været på stedet Hjart ?
Hjart (2016-12-22 19:01:43+00:00): Ja, men dog ikke fornylig.
Hjart (2016-12-22 19:04:08+00:00): Jeg har boet i Sønderborg og er bl.a. cyklet her forbi adskillige gange.
Hjart (2016-12-22 19:08:27+00:00): Grunden til at jeg vurderer billederne som særdeles velkalibrerede er en sammenligning med https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava cycling heatmaps på landevejen og diverse nærliggende stier.
oleffers (2016-12-22 20:24:05+00:00): Tilsvarende kan jeg undre mig over hvorfor du finder det nødvendigt at ændre en sti få timer efter at jeg har oprettet den, og uden at du kender præcisionen på min opmåling. Stien har trods alt manglet på OSM altid, så du har jo haft rig lejlighed til selv at oprette den ;-)
Og selvfølgelig er min opmåling i orden, og jeg kan fuldt ud stå inde for præcisionen. Jeg bruger en ganske udmærket Garmin GPS der måler med 1 sekunds interval, og jeg har tracket turen fire gange før jeg oprettede den på OSM.
Hjart (2016-12-22 20:56:35+00:00): Grunden til jeg overhovedet rørte den var at du havde forbundet enden af stien til p-polygonen og ikke til vejen på p-pladsen. Dette tillader ikke navigation at fungere korrekt og derfor rettede jeg det. 
Med hensyn til gps-modtageres præcision, så har jeg mange års erfaring med den slags, først som aktiv geocacher og derefter med optagelse og anvendelse af adskillige hundrede egne gps-spor i OSM og mine erfaringer siger at selvom det selvfølgelig hjælper at tage tracke en tur flere gange, så skal man ikke overhovedet ikke regne med at kunne lægge en sti eller kalibrere luftfotos tilnærmelsesvist så præcist som en professionel landmåler kan med sit udstyr. Læs iøvrigt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Accuracy_of_GPS_data.
Jeg bruger selv en Garmin GPSmap 62, som efter min erfaring producerer lidt mere pålidelige spor end de fleste andre ikkeprofessionelle modtagere, men selv den kan snyde ;-)
user_6110846 (2017-08-16 20:45:21+00:00): В цій правці ви додали хритиянство керуючисб картинкою супутника шо церква але Ви не відвідували міст отому не в курсі шо в наслідок кровавих релігійних війн та розбірок  православна община УПЦ МП покинула цю церкву , потім відбувались різні церковні розбірки з кровавими бійками та судовими  процесами та спробою УПЦ МП силовим штурмом та бійками  повернути храм .  
На даний час у приміщенні церкви сидить релігійна община  Сама себе вона причисляє до конфесії Росій ська праволславна церква за Кордоном митрополита Сан Франциско -Австралія  проте від даної релігійного угруповання на чолі Агафангел Одеський   публічно відхрестився митрополита Сан Франциско -Австралія " очільники ці відлучені від церкви та позбавлені права здійснювати богослужііння відд імені  моєї церкви.   Підтвердження факту росколу в Російській церкві Закордонній -   інтерв'ю з архіву сайту Антираскол.
~Jhellico (2017-08-19 20:07:27+00:00): Дякую, що хоч інтерв’ю цілком тут не процитували
josmougn (2021-02-09 22:46:50+00:00): bonjour. D'après l'historique de ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219713771 vous avez renommé le Parc Eugène Chanlon en "Les Roches Bleues". Est-ce que vous savez d'où vient ce nom ? Merci. José
Guillaume Mortier (2021-02-10 06:36:52+00:00): Bonjour José,
J'avoue ne pas me souvenir de cette modification. A cette époque, je faisais beaucoup de corrections de typographie...mais je ne me souviens pas avoir modifié ce nom (n'étant pas du coin !)  N'hésitez pas à corriger si "Les Roches Bleues" ne rime à rien.
Guillaume.
MiroJanosik (2016-12-27 07:26:23+00:00): Myslim ze po anglicky sa to pise "Primary school" nie "basic school" a ani to hadam nie je nutne pisat :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:17:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44109532, 44110148, 44110948, 44111707, 44112146, 44112634, 44113031, 44113615, 44113935, 44114396, 44115198, 44116109, 44117025, 44118024, 44128051, 44151379, 44151653, 44152051, 44152493, 44180749, 44181323, 44182069, 44284387, 44394565, 44461821, 44462419, 44482342, 44482478, 44482558, 44483372, 44487468, 44489006, 44508909, 44509109, 44509448, 44510205, 44511095, 44512676, 44513187, 44537509, 44585392, 44586108, 44586329, 44586727, 44586885, 44587278, 44588069.
mueschel (2016-12-28 14:09:46+00:00): Hi,
could you check this object?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426194034
The tag looks strange:
12-0517 = uncontrolled
Jan
Andrzej3345 (2016-12-28 14:49:01+00:00): Thanks for indication. Already fixed.
Correct is ref=12-0517.
BTW, how you discovered that minor mistake - any proofing tool. Happy to hear if I can use it in the future.
mueschel (2016-12-28 15:02:29+00:00): Hi Andrzej,
I wrote a small tool that uses Taginfo to search for new keys:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
Andrzej3345 (2016-12-28 17:18:25+00:00): ok, thanks, I will look at it.
anderfo (2017-01-09 19:24:06+00:00): Dette er vel vanlige stier, ikke sykkelpark? Da bør du bruke mtb:scale, ikke mtb:scale:imba.
Les mer på wikien:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale:imba
Og i den norske omtalen av terrengsykling her:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Mountain_biking
tarjenk (2017-01-10 11:47:52+00:00): Takk for info, da skal jeg bruke rett scale i framtiden. Jeg har rett og slett blingset, flott at folk følger med!
ghostrider44 (2017-01-19 10:25:38+00:00): Hallo Holderbüschle,
ist hier in der Heinrich-Metzger-Straße 10 tatsächlich ein Postkasten? Wenn ja, dann dürfte aber die Anschrift "Lammstraße" nicht stimmen.
Auf der Karte 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.96282/9.06058&layers=N
sind an dieser Stelle auch Markierungen wegen angeblicher Fehler. Könntest du diese auch überprüfen?
Gruß
ghostrider44
Gazer75 (2017-01-02 14:51:35+00:00): So they have actually signposted this road with the white number signs?
user_4384308 (2017-01-02 20:47:59+00:00): https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fylkesvei_312_(Oppland)#/media/File:FV312P.jpg
Gazer75 (2017-01-02 22:31:54+00:00): That's down between fv213 and the "new" connection to E6 and fv255 south of Storhove. If you haven't visually verified signs north of this yourself then please do not alter class.
NVDB list no signs outside this roundabout: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241573731
user_4384308 (2017-01-03 07:49:20+00:00): Viser også til dette: http://www.dolen.no/nyheter/2016/10/17/Gamal-veg-f%C3%A5r-nytt-namn-13656129.ece

Bildet fra Wikipedia er ikke tatt i den nye forbindelsen mellom E 6 og fv 312, men rett nord for rundkjøringen mellom fv 213 og fv 312.
Gazer75 (2017-01-03 12:21:23+00:00): Flott! Då er den grei. Om du bur i området så kan du kanskje sjekke 312 mellom Granrudmoen og Tretten også?
Ser ut til at SVV går bort frå det normale her. Normalt sett har vegklasse 2 og 3 vore skilta, men no ser det ut til at dei også skiltar 4. Får ta dette opp i epost lista. Vi må kanskje gå over til å bruke funksjonell vegklasse frå SVV.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-30 19:20:44+00:00): You've added Flashback Records https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567348592  as a convenience store here .  Is it really that or is it a record shop?
sanchi (2016-12-27 23:31:09+00:00): "C. del obispo" esta mal. Nunca pero nunca de nunca se pone abreviado. Y por favor no escribas en mayusculas "ES SU NOMBRE"
SomeoneElse (2016-12-30 19:22:04+00:00): You've added Kristina records https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567394789 as a toyshop here.  Is it really that or is it a record shop?
BCNorwich (2016-12-23 08:41:12+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The name at least, and perhaps the website and address would be very helpful additions to the database.
Arun M Unnithan (2018-07-09 13:08:55+00:00): Hi, We couldn't find out any connection road / bridge crossing this rail line. Can you please make sure there is any connection road exists?
DavidKewley (2016-12-23 19:57:16+00:00): Hi ncmh91, looks like you removed a runway and associated taxiway, and shrunk the airport grounds accordingly. Could you provide a URL describing this change in the real world? I'm still seeing references on the web to the removed runway, and I'm not (immediately) finding references to its being removed. Thanks! David
Carnildo (2016-12-24 08:30:22+00:00): Bing, Mapbox, and USGS imagery all have "X"s at the ends of the runway, indicating long-term closure.  The FAA master record for the airport (http://www.gcr1.com/5010ReportRouter/default.aspx?airportID=ILN) also notes that runway 4R/22L is closed "until further notice".

It's probably better to map the runway with the appropriate lifecycle prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix), but for the purposes of flying, the runway doesn't exist.
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 19:27:47+00:00): OK, cool, I've learned something today. Thanks Carnildo!
ncmh91 (2016-12-24 23:42:19+00:00): Thanks Carnildo for helping clear this up!
canfe (2021-03-23 11:29:19+00:00): I passaggi nei caselli autostradali non sono dei building passage in quanto non chiusi ai lati come lo è un tunnel e come detto in wiki. Non potrebbero esserlo in ogni caso per via dei gas di scarico, al pari delle stazioni di servizio.
Sarebbero da mettere a posto oltre a questi, altri che eventualmente ha modificato.
A disposizione per un aiuto.
GerdP (2023-11-11 11:01:21+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich bin zur Zeit dabei, die riesigen landuse Flächen zw. Weser und A 29 zu zerlegen, siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/viele-grosse-landuse-mp-zwischen-oldenburg-und-bremen/105311
Dabei stoße ich auf Flächen, die einen Namen haben, z.B. Moorplacken, hier von Dir gesetzt:
https://www.osm.org/relation/3240494
Kannst Du erklären, wo Du den herhast? Ist das evtl. ein Naturschutzgebiet? Gleich daneben gibt es ein MP mit dem Namen Heidplacken: https://www.osm.org/relation/3248638
Hast Du dazu evtl. irgendwelche Infos?
letihu (2023-11-11 19:41:41+00:00): Hallo, von mir ist die Fläche nicht. Ich suche nur nach Bugs ;-)
GerdP (2023-11-11 20:08:26+00:00): Meinst Du damit, dass Du den Namen aus Versehen gesetzt hast? Ist ja genau in diesem CS passiert.
letihu (2023-11-12 15:53:41+00:00): Stimmt, da steht mein Name. Das wird ein Versehen gewesen sein. Vielleicht hatte ich überlappende gleiche Flächen zusammengefügt und dann ist der Name mit übertragen worden. Ich weiß es leider nicht mehr. Kannst den Namen gerne löschen, wenn dieser nicht richtig ist.
GerdP (2023-11-12 18:07:05+00:00): Habe mir das gerade mal in JOSM angeschaut. Vorher war der Name an dem outer-Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240250336
und zwar seit diesem CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/18623331
Werde da mal weiter fragen ...
Paul_012 (2017-08-04 11:36:10+00:00): I've reverted this edit. A motorway passing through a toll booth is obviously not a tunnel=building_passage. I see the flag as a false positive, but have used a layer tag to fix it instead.
BCNorwich (2016-12-23 08:45:05+00:00): Can you be more precise as to the position, middle of the walkway doesn't really help. A name and any other details would be helpful as well.
BCNorwich (2017-01-05 14:16:27+00:00): No response so removed as no information can be gained.
5m4u9 (2016-12-23 13:55:20+00:00): thanks! I will set as hiking trail, like this other route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4122348
Amigo (2016-12-23 20:09:30+00:00): Зачем был убран тег здания и высотность?
literan (2017-01-04 12:17:23+00:00): cause no brain. Reverting
yurasi (2017-01-04 16:23:08+00:00): Hi Amigo, hi Iteran
I'm sorry, I made a mistake. Iteran, I think that not is necessary offend, all we commit errors. I'll more careful in my edits, anyway thanks for had corrected my change.
literan (2017-01-04 17:41:51+00:00): OK, i'm sorry too.
DaveF (2016-12-22 22:15:13+00:00): Hi Sn6wy
What makes you believe it's a footpath?
BCNorwich (2016-12-23 06:59:10+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just looked at your addition to the OSM database. This way is already in OSM so the new way is a duplication, thus I have removed it. You did add some new data which I have included on the existing way. I also see the way extends to the service road at north so I've extended it to join that way.
Regards & Thanks, Bernard
letihu (2017-04-15 15:44:58+00:00): Ob dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58988912/history
hier so richtig ist?
Alles kreuz und quer und durch den Affenkäfig?
Vedran V (2017-01-28 06:50:07+00:00): Pozdrav.

Bez nekog jasnog dokaza, poput objave u Narodnim novinama, ne mogu se po želji ceste prebacivati iz jedne kategorije u drugu. U Narodnim Novinama su jasno definirane rute državnih cesta i one su službene. http://hac.hr/sites/hac.hr/files/cr-collections/1/odlukaorazvrstavanjujavnihcesta.pdf

Isto tako, stavljanje privatnih oznaka "vrt" ili nešto slično isto nije po pravilima Openstreet Mapa.
chillly (2016-12-22 22:08:40+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM.

you seem to have made an edit that is not really what might be expected. Maybe you didn't realise that you were editing the live dataset, but I'm going to revert (undo) this edit.
chillly (2016-12-22 22:16:58+00:00): I had to revert this edit to rescue the previous edit
ToeBee (2016-12-24 06:01:39+00:00): Please do not do this. Changing data in OSM simply to affect Pokemon is considered vandalism. I have reverted this change. Now, if you want to add footpaths that are really missing from the map, by all means, please do so! But OSM should reflect what is actually there in reality. Thanks!
Jenna2784 (2016-12-24 06:09:11+00:00): Hi ToeBee. It actually is a paved footpath. The majority of people using the path are walking. And the majority we talk to are Go players. We rarely see cyclists on this path. The fact that it will update Niantics servers is just an added bonus, but it is why I changed it to begin with. Please change it back. Or I can. Doesn't matter.
Jenna2784 (2016-12-24 06:23:13+00:00): Nevermind, I changed it myself. Also, I see you live in Kansas. I am actually IN LONGVIEW working on updating Longview's maps to ACCURATE representations. Yes, with the goal of ultimately improving Niantics servers, but my edits are accurate. As I said, I actually LIVE HERE and walk these trails. If you continue to harass me or anyone else in my area trying to improve our map system I will report you.
ToeBee (2016-12-24 06:44:17+00:00): I am not harassing anyone. There has been a rash of pokemon related vandalism to OSM which I am working to undo. Your changeset comment  explicitly said that you were changing data in order to affect Niantic servers so I undid it as part of the world-wide vandalism fix I am doing. Perhaps you are right about this being a footway. However just because you don't see a lot of bicycles on it doesn't mean it shouldn't be tagged as a cycleway. Please review the OSM wiki pages for the footway and cycleway tags and decide what fits best: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway 

Due to the history of OSM and its heavy influence from the UK, sometimes the meaning of specific features is a little different than what you might commonly think it means in the U.S. so please make sure your edits are in line with our conventions before you go changing data that others have submitted.
Jenna2784 (2016-12-24 07:21:26+00:00): ToeBee, just because I live in Texas doesn't mean I'm some ignorant American who doesn't know the difference between a lane for a bicycle and a lane for walking. I have reviewed your wiki pages as requested, and none of these walking trails have the bicycle signage or bicycle symbols painted on the pavement. As stated before, on every website referencing this trail it is described as a walking trail. Just because bicycles are welcome does not mean it is solely a bicycle trail. I am not some teenager trying to fool Pokemon Go servers into created new spawn points. I'm changing outdated or incorrect data to accurately reflect what is there. Good for you for fighting actual vandals, but you need to not jump to conclusions and undo the work of actual city natives correctly changing the map.
chillly (2016-12-22 22:17:24+00:00): I had to revert this edit to rescue the two previous edits
luschi (2016-12-22 21:38:43+00:00): revert von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44547709
Commodoortje (2017-06-02 09:32:06+00:00): Welkomst PB verzonden.
Commodoortje (2017-06-02 09:42:41+00:00): Dit bankje zal niet op het voetpad staan.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4567567104
Het is nu verlijmt met het voetpad.
Bąbel (2016-12-23 10:46:15+00:00): co tak skromnie , może całą trawiastą (północną)