piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
blackboxlogic (2020-12-10 02:35:24+00:00): Thanks for contributing to the map. I used an automated process to add the address points, and as you've noticed, they are not exactly where they should be. I'm glad to see that you are aligning them with the buildings. If you're going to do more of this, consider combining the address node with the buildings you draw. The node was just a placeholder, and if there is a building with the address details then the node serves no further purpose. In the iD editor you're using, you can select the node and the building by holding shift, and then press C to combine them. Please ask if you have questions. -Alex
blackboxlogic (2020-12-10 02:38:32+00:00): Also... I'm curious. What sort of business do you run? Adding a link to your profile is free advertising and can give reviewers some context for your edits.
AWTest (2021-03-08 03:14:05+00:00): it's good
Syl (2020-12-10 08:49:39+00:00): Bonjour, par curiosité cette cabine est toujours fonctionnelle avec un combiné à l'intérieur ?
Merci.
user_5359 (2020-12-10 04:42:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
NUMERO_ACTO_ADMINISTRATIVO = 26
NUMERO_PLANO = P-466356
OBJECTID = 607
OBS_PLANO = P1:P-466356 - P2: - P3: - P4: - P5:
OBS_RES = R1: - R2:26-34534 - R3:3918-34554 - R4: - R5: - R6: - R7:
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
nevw (2020-12-10 02:03:11+00:00): Hi
it looks as if you have accidentally shifted a node here.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95580425
Are you able to fix it?
nevw (2020-12-10 02:07:08+00:00): I can revert your changeset and you can start again, if preferred.
nevw (2020-12-11 04:03:08+00:00): no response, I have fixed as best as I can see from City of Melb 2018, 2019 imagery. I am remote from area so unable to survey.
Thomasdap (2020-12-14 23:46:59+00:00): Thank you nevw
SekeRob (2020-12-10 08:27:01+00:00): Hi

As you let half of europe know about your amenity=picnic_table removal, you should be aware that the proper tag is leisure=picnic_table. JIC you'd like to put them back. Taginfo indicates it's been used 147,000 times.
cheers..
Mxdanger (2020-12-10 18:27:22+00:00): Hi,
I just want to let you know that I removed incorrect usage of amenity=picnic_table and when it applicable, it was changed it to leisure=picnic_table. Please look at the changeset history before making assumptions.
SekeRob (2020-12-10 18:49:00+00:00): It's very hard to see when you make changes in big sets covering half of Europe. More helpful is to not just state in your change comment more than just 'Removed deprecated amenity=picnic_table tagging', so pardon my 'assuming'. "Write what you do and do what you write" is an ISO adage. Hard to see 'when applicable' as other editors will not put in picnic_table when there is no picnic table. Anyway, apologies for having disturbed you.
cheers.
Mxdanger (2020-12-10 18:51:22+00:00): I will make sure to avoid confusion in the future with changesets such as this by using a more detailed changeset comment.
Frans S (2020-12-10 09:08:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A rather difficult task to map.
a few remarks. Please use the project imagery instead of Bing. Bing sometimes is opened by default on iDeditor. Please change it . look here how to do that.
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
Another issues is the quality of mapping. 
Please let buildings not connect to each other and square them
I copy you a PM in which you can read back how to improve your mapping skills
Also please solve the issues on the Issue triangle on the right side of iDeditor.
Best regards.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 04:43:42+00:00): This is definitely not a busway either.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 04:48:18+00:00): A "busway" is typically dedicated and constructed purposedfully. (which isn't the same as `busway=`). `highway=busway` is mostly intended for median or side busways, as far as full-on BRT.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 05:01:31+00:00): `service=busway` has some uses. Would you thus consider `highway=service` being appropriate?
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 05:24:23+00:00): Ok I admit I jumped to the conclusion because I'm a bit reserved about `highway=busway`. Reason being these bus streets aren't as separated as general "busway"s, and they have other uses for pedestrians (and sometimes bikes or push carts). I support  `service=busway` in general more.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 05:30:34+00:00): But given that this may possibly used by non-motor vehicles, `=residential` for now.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 05:32:37+00:00): * `highway=service`
小智智 (2020-12-10 05:34:26+00:00): but this is clearly not residential - it is used for THROUGH traffic by buses and non motor vehicles.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-10 05:59:52+00:00): How is it used for through traffic by non-motor vehicles?
user_5239402 (2020-12-10 03:45:41+00:00): 안동역 인근 선로를 차량기지로 설정해 주세요
user_5239402 (2020-12-10 03:46:56+00:00): 그리고 절대로 ~~"역"이라고 쓰지 마세요
mariotomo (2021-12-28 20:26:03+00:00): you're not mapping any more, are you? anyhow, if you come back to OSM, should you see again a "layer=-1" on a building, try to remove it unless it's a subterranean bunker.
mariotomo (2021-12-28 20:35:59+00:00): changeset:115487909
CoyKoi (2020-12-10 09:20:40+00:00): > test if improves walking routing.
It can improve pedestrian routing (especially at complex intersections), but it needs to be meticulously maintained and connected to the existing street network. This post is bang on, IMO: https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/9gxa1x/mapping_sidewalks/e69hyti/
user_5239402 (2020-12-10 07:00:46+00:00): 안녕하세요 
혹시 국내 철도의 표준 규격은 1435mm 표준궤를 쓴다는것을 아시나요? 경전철을 제외한 모든 철도는 표준궤를 씁니다. 또한 경고를 수정해주세요 warnings:crossing_ways:highway-railway	13
warnings:crossing_ways:railway-railway	1
warnings:crossing_ways:railway-waterway 
대부분 도로와 철도가 겹치고 철도와 철도가 겹치고 철도와 하천같은 물지물이 다리 없이 겹처서 생기는 경고입니다. 수정해주시면 감사하겠습니다.
DP24PH (2020-12-10 05:59:01+00:00): Oops! Since you're using MAPS.ME (which may generate several mapping issues), kindly supply your intention thru discussion section. Your kind understanding is highly appreciated, and always remember to be safe, be well, stay sane and dry, and you are loved.


DP24
nevw (2020-12-10 07:26:19+00:00): Hi
I shifted this business out of the school grounds and onto the Royal Far West WOTSO building at 19-21 South Steyne, Manly.
tastrax (2020-12-16 08:56:53+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Commodoortje (2020-12-12 18:49:37+00:00): Op verzoek adresnodes teruggezet.
Zie onderstaande reden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95438351

ninjoh mijn excuus.
DressyPear4 (2020-12-10 09:25:11+00:00): Olá, não crie elementos fictícios. Adicione apenas o que existe
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95589282
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-04 22:15:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.  Please ensure you are following the guidelines and standards for adding features.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145899306
LemonEarlMapper (2024-01-08 14:44:38+00:00): Hello CurlingMan13, This user is no longer on the team, so I will be handling this on their behalf. The changeset that you commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95591027 was for alignment updates in Goiás, Brazil. There were not any updates to the speed limit in FivePoints55 changeset. It appears that you were referring to this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141694100) from the editor nloginov (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nloginov) in Ventura County, California. Was there something specific in FivePoints55’s changeset that you were referring to? Have a nice day.
Negreheb (2020-12-14 07:49:28+00:00): Für eine Qualitätsoffensive lieferst du hier erstaunlich schlechte Qualität. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154785369 das ist mal sicher ein Gebäude und nicht zwei verschiedene. Da hast du einfach quatsch eingezeichnet. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883095853 Woher hast du die Info, dass das eine Garage ist? Sowas gehört einfach als building=yes getagged, du kannst das nur vermuten, nicht wissen. Und, warum ist das so extrem windschief und nicht mit der Hauswand verbunden?

Ebenfalls bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154785407 hier ist das gesamte Gebäude windschief und du hast wieder eine Garage eingezeichnet, wo du nicht wissen kannst, ob es eine ist. Ich persönlich würde das eher als building=yes einzeichnen, aber das finde ich noch weniger schlimm als das windschiefe Haus. 

Und warum du die Qualitäts offensive, wie du das so großspurig nennst, ausgerechnet in der Stadt Salzburg und nicht im Land machst, wo weniger los ist, weist wohl auch nur du selbst.
user_7581226 (2020-12-20 09:22:18+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, 
ich orientiere meine Mitwirkung an OpenStreetMap nach den OSM Wiki Empfehlungen.
user_5239402 (2020-12-10 06:53:27+00:00): 안녕하세요 
역 이름에 ~~"역"이라는 이름을 쓰지 마세요 --역 이라는 이름을 쓰는것은 금지되여 있습니다.
sunghwanchoi (2020-12-11 07:56:13+00:00): 안녕하세요. 저는 지하철역 출구의 숫자 / 출구 위치만 수정하고 있었는데요, 혹시 지하철역 출구의 이름도 '역' 이 들어가면 안되는건가요? 기본적으로 대부분의 역 출구들의 이름이 '~~역 n번 출구' 이런식으로 이미 적혀있었길래, 따로 이름이나 다른 데이터들은 수정하지 않았습니다. 출구의 숫자와 위치만 수정하고 있었습니다.
ralley (2020-12-10 06:58:16+00:00): Again, this is vandalism, stop
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95593515
Marmo4D (2020-12-26 18:29:24+00:00): Hall NicoSa, 
ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob es die beste Lösung ist, den Pfad zu löschen (wird vermutlich dann bald auch wieder eingetragen, weil entweder jemand da war oder ihn auf Luftbildern sehen konnte). In der Gegend hier gibt es ja viele solcher Trampelpfade, die 1-2 mal im Jahr umgepflügt werden und dann innerhalb einiger Wochen wieder "freigetrampelt" werden. Damit sind sie die größte Zeit des Jahres nutzbar. Vielleicht wäre seasonal=yes oder access:conditional (und natürlich informal=yes) sinnvoll?
Gruß,
Marmo4D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95594308
Supaplex (2021-04-17 05:58:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Ewen Hill (2022-12-28 08:00:48+00:00): Hi, the last bit of Hinemoa Terrace near the Bikinhead point ferry could be more a service road than a living street. I've left it as such as not 100% what the preference is in NZ.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-12-28 10:38:27+00:00): sure, I'm not sure if there is a convention in NZ, there seems to be a mix of both approaches. If service road is more fitting feel free to change it
ralley (2020-12-10 07:29:46+00:00): Stop adding "Church of Pedophilia" this is vandalism
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95595814
TravGW (2020-12-10 15:12:53+00:00): Hello, I noticed you changed a service road to a track. When a road leads to a house or another site such as an oil well it should be tagged as a driveway. Even if said road is 7 miles long and in the middle of a ranch. I've already fixed the tagging.

It's possible you were only copying the tagging of the surrounding roads which were also mistakenly tagged as tracks. They too should have been driveways.
limmmoh (2020-12-11 05:14:09+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect tagging of track road, will ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
limmmoh.
angys (2020-12-10 07:52:14+00:00): 2,0 offset
aceman444 (2021-02-20 02:58:41+00:00): Zdravim, su tie ulice fakt vo vystavbe? Alebo este len planovane (highway=proposed)
segi (2021-02-20 07:06:17+00:00): hej sú vo výstavbe. začali to robiť na jeseň. ešte tam myslím neni asfalt iba sú porobené terénne úpravy a ukladali kanalizáciu keď som tam bol naposledy (3 mesiace dozadu). obkreslil som to podľa katastra.
aceman444 (2021-02-20 11:12:09+00:00): Ano, v katastri to je, ale v inych obciach to tam ke aj roky dopredu nez nieco zacun stavat. Je to len plan. Ked ste to teda uz videli rozkopane (lebo ani na Maxare este nie je), tak super, dakujem.
segi (2021-02-21 08:19:02+00:00): hej hej, viem tiež som chvíľu špekuľoval ako to zakresliť až som si všimol kataster. vravím veľmi rýchlo to začali robiť. ten projekt tam je už viac ako 20r...
SerPo (2021-04-08 08:15:56+00:00): Откуда такая информация берётся о перекрытия в связи со стр-вом СВХ, тогда по этой дороге машины до сих пор ездят. Я позавчера ездил по этой дороге...
roads.ru, ЦОДД ничего не информируют и на roads.ru показывает, что дорога  проезжамая Пакет правок: 95597981
literan (2021-04-08 09:28:20+00:00): значит, открыли. У яндекса, вон, до сих пор перекрыто: https://yandex.ru/maps/213/moscow/?l=trf&ll=37.630715%2C55.605455&z=17

исправьте, пожалуйста
SerPo (2021-04-08 10:07:33+00:00): Привет! Спасибо за информацию!
Я думаю, что ничего исправлять не надо, тут всё верно...
literan (2021-04-08 10:12:01+00:00): ну, смотрите. На свежем видео видно, что еще ездят: https://youtu.be/uoe6QDCgLxU?t=552
augxcgrwxo (2020-12-11 08:16:43+00:00): Оказалось ошибочно, можно удалить как no
ndm (2020-12-11 20:05:10+00:00): I've redrawn this - there are 2 separate ways -- your version seems to go through a wall. Bing Streetside helps.
staslima (2020-12-15 07:48:03+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have overlooked the wall and misinterpreted the geometry. Thanks for the quick correction. Going forward, I will make sure to double check the imagery before saving my edits. always happy to learn from the community.
olo81 (2023-08-16 15:24:21+00:00): nie nanosimy dróg, które są na geoportalu, a nie ma ich w terenie
druga sprawa to że zostały naniesione dwie drogi jedna na drugiej
user_2066394 (2020-12-10 14:12:05+00:00): Mit 100 in den Kreisverkehr ist sportlich.
Hans Loderer (2020-12-10 18:18:27+00:00): Praktisch macht das natürlich keinen Sinn, maxspeed enthält aber immer den formal gültigen Wert. Es gibt auch viele anderen Straßen auf den formal 100 gilt, praktisch aber kaum möglich ist. Es ist wohl eines der größten Misserständnisse was die StVO angeht, dass formale maxspeed == praktisch fahrbare Geschwindigkeit angenommen wird.
Gruß Hans
totera (2020-12-10 12:33:49+00:00): Ti ho detto nell'altro commento dell'incrocio in cui ci sono i cartelli, ma sono a ovest e a sud, non a est...
Perdonami, ma che senso ha mappare così?
trigpoint (2020-12-11 17:17:33+00:00): Hi again, I have been looking at your edits a bit closer and have spotted a very serious error made in this changeset. You have deleted a large section of bridleway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38571410/history. which has broken the rights of way network. It is clearly visible on imagery so I am intrigued as to why you shortened it.

Also you have disconnected a stile from the boundary and moved the boundary to include the roadside verges. Stiles are after all a means to cross hedge.

Cheers Phil

Cheers Phil
Reino Baptista (2020-12-12 00:23:43+00:00): Hi.
It was not my intention to delete the bridleway. It was a lapse. My bad.

I understand that you have reverted all this changeset. So there's no need for me to correct any edit I have done.

Please notice that "Battlefield Heritage Park" in no longer on the map.
trigpoint (2020-12-12 11:19:54+00:00): I realise the name is no longer on the map. I am still working on breaking the area into it individual fields and farmland types.
When I have determined the actual boundary and protection status I will add the correct name. The name "Battlefield Heritage Park" is fiction.

Cheers Phil
SekeRob (2020-12-17 16:33:44+00:00): Hi,

FYI. removed the layer=-1 tag. on Via Enrico Jasonni (secondo tratto). Got a underground warning, no tunnel.
ciao.
FinixFighter (2020-12-18 09:06:52+00:00): Oh thank you! I had noticed that but then I forgot it.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-12-10 14:39:17+00:00): Ciao Michele, io qui leggo Via XXV Aprile e non Vicolo Ariale (che è la strada prima venendo da Tronzano). Ciao, Andrea https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=7QNqeoqSfTUgM3XBTqZdEw&focus=photo&lat=45.30942792262252&lng=8.019779049222166&z=17&x=0.3378112261149156&y=0.06840766541209183&zoom=2.2254725182978947
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95601738
Vinber-Pro (2020-12-12 07:15:42+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour la prise en compte des retours,
j'ai ai profité pour faire un peu de toilettage (ajout de bâtiments, de zone horticole, de la ferme, ...)

Bonne cartographie !
Matteo Calosi (2021-06-18 10:56:45+00:00): Il tratto di sentiero italia fociomboli-del freo aggiunto con questo changeset è stranamente difforme dal percorso del CAI 129 e, a quanto mi risulta dai passaggi in zona, per quanto non recentissimi, inesistente. Ho cancellato i nuovi tratti e spostato la relazione SI a coincidere col 129. Se dovessi sbagliarmi e l'aggiunta corrispondesse a nuovi tratti di sentiero invito a fare revert del mio changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106583584.
abakus_uploader (2020-12-10 23:32:05+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kapazao (2020-12-10 16:38:41+00:00): Hello, is this really necessary?
I think default value is "no". I would understand if you add something with "yes", but this is redundant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95602466
dvdhoven (2020-12-10 11:39:49+00:00): Je hebt 8 fietsknooppuntroutes, de Grunroute, het Peerkepad en 3 busroutes beschadigd met deze changeset.
Met ID kun je geen wegen doorknippen met routes erop, dat moet jij met jouw ervaring inmiddels toch weten.
En het vervelende is, dat jij het zelf niet kunt herstellen en dus andere mensen, de schade, die jij veroorzaakt, moeten herstellen.
En dat was laatst ook al zo, toen je bij een rotonde de fietspaden hebt veranderd,
De zelfde routes 38-43 en 41-43 waren ook nu weer stuk en deze routes hebben lange stukken met forward/backward, wat hun herstel bijzonder lastig maakt.
Als je routes wilt inleggen zul je JOSM moeten gaan gebruiken.
Bij het doorknippen met ID wordt in veel gevallen de sortering van de routes verstoord.
Ik heb alle routes hersteld.
Ik begrijp werkelijk niet waarom mensen met die waardeloze tool ID blijven hannesen.
Als in de route, die jij nu hebt ingelegd, de volgorde verstoord raakt, kun jij dat niet meer herstellen en zeer waarschijnlijk niet eens meer zien. En dan blijft er op een gegeven moment alleen nog een onherstelbare gatenkaas van jouw route over.
eggie (2020-12-10 12:00:00+00:00): PB verstuurd
gr eggie
klimpetje (2020-12-10 14:26:04+00:00): Wow, ik wist niet dat dit zo een effect had. Dank voor deze update. Ik zal weer met josm gaan werken. Had niet gedacht dat het zo verstorend zou zijn. Dank voor de waarschuwing
SekeRob (2020-12-10 16:41:35+00:00): Ciao Finixfighter

Osmose odiando parole e nome solo in maiùscolo. https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=xxxx&zoom=16&lat=42.45868&lon=14.23412&level=1&tags=&fixable=
Quando proprio, marka con X, e i alarma non ritorna mai.
FinixFighter (2020-12-12 09:10:14+00:00): Thank you for your report. I fixed this.
Andrea Del Sarto (2020-12-20 20:47:44+00:00): salve,
qual è la fonte del sentiero inserito in zona passo Sella? (way 883137828) è già presente una traccia molto simile

saluti
Andrea
Andrea Del Sarto (2020-12-20 20:51:38+00:00): stessa cosa per la way 883137824, in questo caso la traccia è un accenno di sentiero, che si stacca dalla via vandelli
Matteo Calosi (2021-06-18 15:34:33+00:00): Ho eliminato i tratti di sentiero segnalati da Andrea del Sarto e trasferito la relazione sentiero italia sui percorsi preesistenti dei sentieri CAI 31 e 35. Invito a fare revert del changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106596455 se i percorsi in oggetto dovessero effettivamente esistere, oppure a fare maggiore attenzione in quella che immagino sia un'iniziativa istituzionale di mappatura se non dovessero esistere (come dovrebbe essere il caso)
mawutor (2020-12-10 11:37:00+00:00): so only 6 things you map then you lef go no be so huh cheers mawutor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95603656
StefanHRT (2020-12-10 10:05:09+00:00): Hey Nico, Welches Verkehrszeichen gilt dort gemäß der Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren ? Solte ja dann bereits ab dem Nottekanal gelten, oder? Gruß
NicoSa (2020-12-10 10:29:05+00:00): Ja, es müsste das Zeichen 240 sein.
StefanHRT (2020-12-10 10:41:06+00:00): OK, dann schaue ich mal ob es mapillary-Bilder gibt zur Absicherung und bearbeite das alles in einem Rutsch, erspart Dir die Einzeländerungen ;)
Luzandro (2020-12-15 17:17:46+00:00): Es ist in dem Fall wohl ok, da es eine zusätzliche Eigenschaft ist, aber im Grunde immer noch ein building=hut

In anderen Fällen ist es umgekehrt und besser die lifecycle prefixes zu verwenden. Ein abgerissenes Haus kann man bspw. als demolished:building in der Datenbank lassen, solange es noch auf Luftbildern zu sehen ist, oder ein aktuell leer stehendes Geschäft als disused:shop, so dass alle Auswerter gleich automatisch erkennen, dass diese Eigenschaft nicht mehr zutrifft ohne extra demolished oder disused unterstützten zu müssen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95605303
kuhni74 (2020-12-15 17:35:45+00:00): Vielen Dank! Ganz verstehe ich es aber noch nicht. Ist es richtig, dass Objekte, die im Grunde nicht mehr angezeigt werden sollen, ein lifecycle prefix wie z.B. demolished oder disused erhalten sollen, während Objekte, die schon noch angezeigt werden sollen weil sie in der Landschaf sichtbar sind, die Eigenschaft als Attribut bekommen sollen? Das finde ich nämlich bei "Ruine" merkwürdig, weil eine Ruine ist ja auch noch in der Landschaft sichtbar, wird aber in OSM versteckt, wenn ich nicht irre.
Luzandro (2020-12-15 18:03:57+00:00): Das wird offenbar ein wenig unterschiedlich gehandhabt, aber so wie ich das sehe, ist auch im Wiki die aktuell empfohlene - und für mich sinnvolle - Variante historic=castle + ruins=yes
SomeoneElse (2020-12-10 11:34:23+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetmap,
Based on the hashtags, this looks like part of an organised edit.  If so, please can you make sure that you follow https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines including "A user’s profile page should also include links to the wiki pages of the organised edits and organisations they participate in on an ongoing basis".
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group