piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-10-15 20:38:59+00:00): Oke.. maar de periode van afsluiting is al voorbij voordat de routers hun update hebben doorgevoerd. :)
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 03:35:01+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92539187
G1asshouse (2020-10-19 01:58:26+00:00): I think this changeset and other similar ones, would benefited from a preliminary conversation with the greater Puget Sound / Washington State mapping community. If that has occurred, I apologize and could you point me to where this conversation happened?

After reviewing this changeset and other similar ones, I believe a number of these corrections are in error. Judging by this OSM Wiki entry, in Tag:place=suburb, "For example, the Lake City area in Seattle (node 150938688) should be tagged as a 'suburb'", I suspect many of these hamlets are more appropriately tagged as "suburb" as opposed to “neighborhood”. It appears that larger regions, such as North Seattle, might be best tagged as "borough". Smaller areas, such as Little Saigon, might be best tagged as "quarter" or “neighborhood” with the surrounding International District tagged as "suburb". In Changeset #92546447, neighborhood O'Brien (down in Kent) was deleted. Looking at the history of the area and noting the fact that Neely O'Brien Elementary is a school in the area, I think O’Brien suburb/neighborhood is valid even if it is in the process of fading into obscurity.
pnorman (2020-10-23 02:58:27+00:00): It's pretty clear that these points are not hamlets, and are either neighbourhoods or suburbs. Suburb might be more correct for some of them, but neighbourhood is certainly better than hamlet, even if it isn't perfect.

I looked hard at O'Brien, which was located up 212th Street. I think the process of fading into obscurity has completed and the name is no longer used for the neighbourhood.

Searching online, there seems to be no use of the term O'Brien to describe the area. Real estate sites don't list it as a neighbourhood and the city doesn't list it that I can see. I know that suburban neighbourhoods sometimes don't have that strong of an identity, but I'd expect to find some usage. I think the name is dead as a neighbourhood, and will live on in a couple of building names.
eggie (2020-10-16 06:36:07+00:00): Dag Joepie.. bicycle=no hoef je niet toe te voegen op wandelpaden..  Het is default.
Gr eggie
joepie91 (2020-10-16 10:04:52+00:00): Dat is gek, want OsmAnd interpreteerde dit als een geldig fietspad. Is dat dan een bug in OsmAnd, of staat er een andere tag verkeerd?
eggie (2020-10-16 11:00:24+00:00): Vreemd.. Zat wel even naar die foto bij de note te kijken. Daar staat geen bord fietspad.
De voorlaatste tagging is van 2014. 
We taggen highway=footway als er zo'n blauw bord met de wandelaar met kind staat en als het duidelijk voor voetgangers is bedoeld. dat zal hier het geval zijn.
Op highway=footway is bicucle=no al default. Het zal niet routeren volgens de routingregels van OSM.
Bij highway= path is dat niet default en is het verstandig om vehicle=no te taggen.
Denk dat het probleem dus bij OsmAnd ligt of aan de instellingen van de app. 
Ik kijk nog even met josm of er iets veranderd is. 
gr eggie
eggie (2020-10-16 11:01:58+00:00): typo.. staat geen bord fietspad... > staat geen bord wandelpad. bedoel ik.
eggie (2020-10-16 11:06:10+00:00): In JOSM zie ik niets vreemd. Overigens geeft josm geen foutmelding meer als je bicycle=no tagt op een wandelpad. Maar nodig is het niet.
Het zal niet routeren volgend de routing afspraken.. Het zou anders betekenen dat je alle wandelpaden in Nederland/ter wereld moet gaan voorzien van bicycle=no.
Dat gaan we niet doen. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-10-16 11:13:16+00:00): Gelijk maar de naam van het park er op gezet met transparant leisure=park
joepie91 (2020-10-16 14:10:43+00:00): Ik heb het even getest, en OsmAnd lijkt tot mijn verbazing inderdaad ook gewoon over andere voetpaden te routeren. Lijkt me inderdaad niet de bedoeling, dus dan zal ik daar wel even een bug rapporteren. Bedankt!

Moet de bicycle=no nog weggehaald worden, of kan die zo blijven staan?

(Er staat inderdaad geen voetgangersbord, maar de zeer vervelende hekjes waar je met je fiets nauwelijks of niet doorheen komt, suggereren wel dat dat de intentie was.)
eggie (2020-10-16 14:35:12+00:00): Kwaad kan het natuurlijk niet die tag. 
Dat slingerhekje heb ik ook nog ingetekend.
Groet
Eggie
joepie91 (2020-10-16 14:46:14+00:00): Thanks. Ik zal binnenkort de andere hekjes op de andere paden ook nog wel even mappen (zodra ik een zinnige manier daarvoor gevonden heb op Android).

Bug is inmiddels gerapporteerd: https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/10035
eggie (2020-10-16 15:12:48+00:00): Hoi..
barrier=cycle_barrier laat overens wel fietsers door zonder verdere accesstags..maar highway=footway zou niet moeten routeren. Ook zou het als onverhard worden gezien in de meeste routers.
user_2008655 (2020-10-27 09:21:05+00:00): 您好，该段道路现在为国道，请使用正确颜色的线路标识（即highway=trunk），谢谢
Hello, this road is nowadays National Highway, please use the true colored route mark (i.e. highway=trunk), thank you
Darellur (2020-10-26 14:13:59+00:00): Proszę, wyjaśnij, dlaczego zamieniłeś landuse=residential w multipolygon i dodałeś chodnik tylko po jednej stronie ulicy bez tagu chodnika i zmany tagu na ulicy
!bm (2020-10-15 20:56:00+00:00): Hallo RudolfRakete,

bist du dir sicher, was (adressbedingte) Position, Öffnungszeiten und Tel.nr. anbelangt? Letztere sind hier abweichend nämlich: http://www.agrar-boerse-ev.de/standorte-projekte/friedrichshain-kreuzberg/buecherstube/oeffnungszeiten-und-kontakt/

Ich habe mal ein entsprechendes fixme=* angebracht und noch social_facility ergänzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92543587

--besteGrüße!bm
RudolfRakete (2020-10-16 11:40:53+00:00): Hallo,
also selbst angerufen habe ich nicht, aber ich stand davor und habe die Nummer von einem Zettel, der in der Tuer haengt, abgeschrieben.
!bm (2020-10-16 12:52:44+00:00): vielen Dank für die zeitnahe Antwort. Vor-Ort ist nach OSM-Standard besser als Website. 

(Ich habe den node jetzt allerdings wie im anderen Cs https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92582121 erwähnt nun mit dem früheren shop=furniture fusioniert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92585774 )

--besteGrüße!bm
eggie (2020-10-15 20:09:01+00:00): Dag arrow.. Een klein stukje groen kun je beter als landuse intekenen.
leisure=park is geen vervanging voor landuse. Het is een transparant die alleen de functie aangeeft.
definitie park
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
arrow87 (2020-10-15 21:38:52+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Dank voor de uitgebreide uitleg. Het is aangepast.
Groeten,
Arno
eggie (2020-10-16 06:02:42+00:00): Hoi Arno,

Best lastig al die mogelijkheden.
landuse=park bestaat niet als tag. ;.leisure=park is overigens niet wat je ziet, maar een functie.
grass, forest zijn bv landuse.
Het is gemeentegroen. Daar is nog steeds geen goede tagging voor.
Ik heb er even natural=scrub van gemaakt met losse bomen.
Dus
natural=scrub en op nodes
natural=tree
Dit plantsoentje valt niet onder de definitie park dus hoeft ook geen transparant leisure=park. 
Gr eggie
aharvey (2020-10-17 00:21:18+00:00): this area was already mapped as wood so I deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859429890/history
eggie (2020-10-15 20:20:04+00:00): Dag Djumbol,
Ziet er netjes uit. Nu staan die bushaltes in zo'n geval in een relatie met de relatie van de busroutes. Wellicht dat de OV route-experts nog even zullen kijken. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-15 20:59:30+00:00): Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92541558
name=  niet gebruiken.. evt description
highway=service zou ik hier gebruiken. Dat wordt het meest gedaan.
Er zal wel een bord C1 staan
Dan
vehicle=no
horse=no
bus=yes

access=destination is denk ik niet goed. 
Of mag je iemand afzetten?
 Welke borden staan er?
Kijk je nog even?
Gr eggie
ralley (2020-10-16 18:33:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Unfortunately this changeset looks to have dragged a node of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857492004  and merged it with the yoga studio node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5425997346 which is an error
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92541795
omgitsgela (2020-10-23 03:29:53+00:00): Hi JCoraggio, and thanks for mapping with OSM!

As requested, I took a look at your edits, and these three buildings look great! One thing you can do to ensure you have very good accuracy when drawing buildings is to frequently change between different background satellite imagery. By changing to a different image set, it can sometimes help to show features that aren't clear or obstructed by tree cover.

Keep on mapping! :)
Luzandro (2020-10-17 05:24:16+00:00): Hi,

the path, which was created 8 years ago with trail_visibility=horrible, was deleted about a month ago with this CS and could be restored if it still exists:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90739434

The fact that it still appears in other maps is not a reason on its own. Neither is the fact that it is located in a protected area a reason to delete it, but that was only one argument given by René aus Berlin.

regards
Andreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92541922
jleedev (2020-10-16 17:35:50+00:00): Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547059780/history

It can be preferable to keep a demolished building around if new features have not yet been mapped on top of it.

And please use more descriptive changeset comments.
boopington (2020-10-16 19:39:02+00:00): There have though, parking
omgitsgela (2020-10-23 03:35:18+00:00): Hi JCoraggio, and thanks for mapping with OSM!

As requested, I reviewed the edits you made. They all look great! Only thing I could mention is it might be a good idea to consolidate multiple edits into one or two changeset uploads instead of a bunch of them. It makes it easier on the system :)

Keep on mapping!
eda_n (2020-10-15 20:47:14+00:00): Burim : survey
Andrea Musuruane (2020-10-17 09:17:24+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Cos'è percorso 7? Se è un percorso ciclabile devi usare una relazione di tipo route: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes#Relations. Inoltre, il tag bicycle=yes su una highway=track è ridondante (una bici può sempre passare su questo tipo di strade). Ciao, Andrea
Moreno Fazio (2020-10-17 12:11:07+00:00): Ciao grazie del supporto.  Il percorso 7 non l'ho creato io, era già presente. Se risulta modificato forse è perché  ho inserito un ponte perché mi è uscito l'avviso. Grazie comunque del consiglio
omgitsgela (2020-10-23 03:40:55+00:00): Hi JCoraggio, and thanks for mapping with OSM!

I reviewed your changeset, as requested. Great alignment on the residential roads and driveways. You did use a lot of nodes around the curves of Scioto Court... remember, the less nodes you use, the smaller the downloads of the data will be for the end user. Sometimes I even go through and delete every other node on things I'm editing sometimes.

Great work! :D
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-11-07 17:14:04+00:00): Why you created viewpoint at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2103863671/history ?
RaNo99 (2020-11-08 23:08:28+00:00): Because of the unique view on Wawel through the gate from this point (southwards).
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-11-18 08:43:54+00:00): Thanks for reply, I added it to description of that object
Rom1 (2020-10-16 20:02:00+00:00): Bonjour, pour information, j'ai à nouveau retiré le tag addr:street car déjà présent dans la relation associatedStreet https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3312272 Merci.
blackboxlogic (2020-10-17 23:36:49+00:00): I'm skeptical about using relations to group multiple parts of a trail. The tagging channel in slack or the wiki might have guidance.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92543350
philipmolloy (2020-10-18 00:35:10+00:00): Yah, I know what you mean. I'll be sure to ask in Slack before I make any similar changes.
JesseFTW (2024-11-01 23:38:40+00:00): It looks like you drew in the way named "Moody River" in this changeset. I think it may be mis-named; the USGS maps have Moody River as a nearby one, and that one unnamed, and the MassGIS Basemap names that one "Twinning Pond Brook". Do you happen to remember more about where you found that name?
Yury Yatsynovich (2024-11-02 17:21:44+00:00): You're right: it looks like I've assigned the name to a wrong stream. I've just deleted the "Moody Brook" name from the wrong steam (along with your fixme tag). Thanks!!
JesseFTW (2024-11-02 21:29:27+00:00): Excellent, thanks for checking and confirming the mistake! Appreciate all your work on adding the streams and relations -- it's making my adding of SARIS codes much easier.
Yury Yatsynovich (2024-11-04 14:26:02+00:00): My pleasure!
l5818 (2020-10-15 20:54:37+00:00): address should be 1221
omgitsgela (2020-10-23 03:46:56+00:00): Hi JCoraggio, and thanks for editing with OSM!

I reviewed your edits, as requested. The roadway alignment you changed looks great, as well as the driveways you added.  Remember, less is more when it comes to number of nodes you use.

Keep on mapping! :)
Awizonosz (2020-10-20 13:06:49+00:00): Czy tutaj jest coś źle zmapowane?
Crusier (2020-10-20 13:53:06+00:00): Już teraz nie jest, ale w zestawie zmian https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92389093 dodałeś tutaj surface=paving stones podczas gdy jest asfalt
Glassman (2020-10-16 00:14:01+00:00): We don't put personal information in OSM. Lacher house sounds like personal information. Can you fix this?
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 03:40:29+00:00): Sierrae los cambios que estás realizando no siguen las directrices de cambio de nombres de la comunidad de OSM sigue en México. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A9xico/Convenciones#Od.C3.B3nimos_de_v.C3.ADas. Te agradecería no modificar la etiqueta Key:name si existe y agregues tus datos en Key:alt_name
riskybiznu (2020-10-19 16:23:32+00:00): Hello! Thank you for reaching out. The only road named in this changeset did not have a name in OSM, so I added the name from INEGI data to this road as its name. I understand your concern for correct data. I would not have made it an alt name since the road did not previously have a name at all. It is not correct to add an alt name to an unnamed road. 

¡Hola! Gracias por comunicarte. La única carretera nombrada en este conjunto de cambios no tenía un nombre en OSM, así que agregué el nombre de los datos de INEGI a esta carretera como su nombre. Entiendo su preocupación por los datos correctos. No lo habría convertido en un nombre alternativo ya que la carretera no tenía ningún nombre anteriormente. No es correcto agregar un nombre alternativo a una carretera sin nombre.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-15 23:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92546434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Northern Brazil.  See block 3988 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-15 23:15:59+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 92546246.
nevw (2020-10-16 08:18:36+00:00): Hi
building tags are only used on buildings and not the surrounding land. I altered the polygon shape to include the remaining building and tagged it as landuse=residential.
If the extra building is not used for residential use can you exclude it and give it tags to indicate it's use.
angys (2020-10-23 11:34:04+00:00): Can you please update and trace new roads in Puncak Alam, Selangor?
mullica_q (2020-10-26 22:42:03+00:00): Thanks for reaching out. Is there a particular neighborhood you believe needs updated? What resources would you recommend?
angys (2020-10-27 01:39:52+00:00): Maxar standard
kartonage (2020-10-16 04:18:31+00:00): Bringt ja nun nichts folgende Problematik einfach zu ignorieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3944

Scheinbar hat sich nichts an der Vorgehensweise geändert.
Adlerh_75 (2021-01-13 20:28:13+00:00): Meine Änderungen, die ich über die App Maps.Me mache beziehen sich alle aus der aktuellen Homepage, der jeweiligen Firmen/Institutionen.

Bei Maps.Me, kann man diese Felder ergänzen oder eintragen. Wieso werfen Sie mir dann vor, das ich was schlechter mache oder falsche Einträge mache?
Warin61 (2020-10-27 05:45:08+00:00): Hi,

1) the state park
Multipolygons outers cannot share ways ... that is one outer way cannot overlay another outer way... 

2) overlaps of state park with state forest? 
As the state forest is now the state park? would it not be simpler to take the present relation of the state forest and make that the state park???
Warin61 (2020-11-13 05:33:08+00:00): See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.76701&lat=-37.77523&zoom=12 for some issues that should be fixed.
nevw (2020-11-13 13:15:43+00:00): I would advise moving to a more capable editor like Josm if you are editing such large and complex areas and multipolygons.
Warin61 (2021-01-04 00:53:21+00:00): Relation 9267547 still broken.
Warin61 (2021-02-11 06:41:03+00:00): Best attempt made to fix this - using OSM only. 
Numerous errors e.g. overlapping ways etc etc.
TheSwavu (2021-02-16 10:40:03+00:00): I've put the Enfield State Park back to where it should be. Also fixed up Enfield State Forest at the same time (and tagged it forest). Also had to restore the boundaries of Jubilee Historic Area.
Warin61 (2021-02-18 06:54:20+00:00): Thanks. 
Not familiar with the area at all. 

Andrew - looks like the State Park could do with some land cover mapping.
Paul_012 (2020-10-31 10:54:48+00:00): In this edit, you shifted the position of the entire the expressway object, resulting in poor geometry away from the main area you were editing. In addition to relying on misaligned imagery (as mentioned at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91793091 ), you also didn't appear to account for parallax: If you're editing an elevated expressway, you must align the road with the base of the pillars, not the direct appearance of the road in the imagery, which will appear shifted due to the camera angle.
Paul_012 (2020-10-31 11:21:50+00:00): I've reverted the moving of the expressway in changeset 93333656.
radiotrefoil (2020-10-16 02:28:13+00:00): that's funny, I think we made the exact same change at pretty much the same time
mariotomo (2020-10-24 15:33:07+00:00): hola Carlos Eduardo.  porqué pusiste operator y operator2?  si lo haces en JOSM, te avisa que no está bien así.  cómo estaría bien, depende de qué es lo que quieres representar.
Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez (2020-10-26 19:24:42+00:00): Hola Mario, en la Ruta Forestal-Mercado operan dos empresas que manejan una misma ruta.
mariotomo (2020-12-31 17:02:34+00:00): hola, sorry, no te he vuelto a contestar … es que no entiendo, estás mapeando el terminal, o las rutas?  será que lo hablamos en el grupo?
Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez (2020-12-31 23:54:01+00:00): En ese conjunto de cambios solo los comercios que esta existentes en la Terminal de Santiago y añadí la parada de rutas urbanas que es una sección lateral de la terminal.
mariotomo (2021-05-21 16:32:11+00:00): hola. el objeto sigue con la etiqueta `operator2`.  si son dos empresas que utilizan la misma oficina para ofrecer el mismo servicio, igual se trata de dos relaciones, no es información que pertenece a la terminal, sino a la relación. te suena? si necesitas ayuda, a toda disposición.
mariotomo (2021-05-21 16:33:39+00:00): (En ese conjunto de cambios sólo añadiste el nodo relativo a la terminal de transporte.)
mariotomo (2021-07-04 15:05:01+00:00): mírese https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105638353
lakedistrict (2020-10-16 08:01:20+00:00): Hi, unfortunately this changeset is wrong. There is only one barrier which was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264452143. Crag Walk is drivable all the way from Helm Road to the bollard linked above. Reverted in 92566848.
bathines (2020-10-16 15:57:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the barrier based on the internal driver feedback and OS open data. I have added the note so that the community would validate it with the ground reality. Thanks for the modification, it is good to see the community improvising our edits. Always happy to learn from the community.
wislander (2021-06-06 04:41:32+00:00): Hi Omnific,

I noticed you added `amenity=police` to the SPD stables at Westcrest Park. This tag is meant only for a standard police station, typically where a member of the public could walk in to file a police report, etc. The stables don't have any public-facing facilities, so I think `amenity=police` should be removed.

Regards,
wislander
Omnific (2021-06-06 18:23:47+00:00): Hi wislander,

That's a fair point, your approach seems to match the standard in the wiki. Thanks!
Kovoschiz (2020-11-02 08:04:27+00:00): Can you explain your basis for this name? Manually reverted in https://osmcha.org/changesets/93392881.
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-16 05:00:35+00:00): Hi!
It's usually better to split up changesets if your changes are in different parts of the country and unrelated to each other
_dcooley (2020-10-16 05:04:10+00:00): Thanks for the tip! This was my first edit, but I'll keep it in mind for next time.
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-16 05:09:49+00:00): No worries, saw it was your first
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:09:49+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Warin61 (2021-01-04 00:51:42+00:00): 2021 .. relation still broken.
TheSwavu (2021-02-16 10:37:33+00:00): Should be fixed now.
Mahdi Nameghi (2020-10-19 04:59:12+00:00): سلام
شما با ایجاد ریلیشن 11759813 مسیر میدان به بلوار ماهان غربی رو کلا مسدود کردید
میشه بفرمایید علت این موضوع چیست؟
AnonymousAlligator (2020-10-16 17:14:09+00:00): Please do not change street names to the names of businesses, or add advertising copy to OpenStreetMap (this applies to both the map itself and your user profile page). This changeset has been reverted.

If you'd like to add your business to the map, you should place a point over your location, choose the type of business from the sidebar search, and then add the business's name and optionally address/contact info. If you have any questions, leave a comment below and I'd be glad to answer them.
Kovirii (2020-10-20 22:02:35+00:00): Thanks for restoring the emergency access/service tags. I guess making as planned was premature.
AnonymousAlligator (2020-10-16 15:51:50+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Currently your business won't show up on any maps because you haven't added a tag to describe what kind of place it is.

Am I correct in guessing you're a real estate agency? If so, just select your business, go to the sidebar in the editor, and search for "Real Estate Office."

If you have any questions, just comment here and I'd be glad to answer them. Thanks for adding your business to OpenStreetMap!