piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PeZa (2016-01-22 10:17:17+00:00): Ahoj Mariane, 
  Diky za upozornění.
Mám pocit, pokud je to jen  na budově, tak to pak nejde najít jako POI v OSM na Androidu. Můžeš potvrdit tohle pozorování? Nejsem si sám jistý, je možné že se mýlím a tuhle zkušenost mám díky budovám ktere měly name tag, ale neměly amenity tag. 

Z toho důvodu jsem i přidával POI na dobře otagovane objekty nebo tagoval a přidával obojí. 

Vyzkoušel jsem pár hledání nad PotLatchem s androidem v ruce a pokud jsou tagy na objektu korektní, tak je interpretován POI. 
=> pročistím poslední změny které jsem dělal. 
Zdraví 
   PeZa
PeZa (2016-01-22 10:23:12+00:00): Jednu otazku bych ještě měl. 
Jak řešit ubytování a restauraci v stejném objektu tak, aby byly dohledatelné jak jako POI restaurant, tak jako POI accomodation? 
?
Marián Kyral (2016-01-22 11:27:00+00:00): Ahoj. Záleží co přesně myslíš tím "OSM na Androidu" - těch programů tam je více. OsmAnd, Lotus, Maps.me...

V každém případě, pokud je v některém programu s vyhledáváním POI, primárně by si to měl řešit daný program. Není správné přizpůsobovat data v mapě jednomu konkrétnímu programu. Můžeš tím rozbít další programy, které to mají správně.

Pokud si s tou chybou v programu nejsi jistý, stačí napsat do české emailovové konference. Tak jistě někdo zkušený poradí, tak to udělat správně. viz: http://openstreetmap.cz/komunita

Ohledně restaurace a ubytování. Lze to udělat jako jeden bod, který bude mít amenity=restaurant a tourism=hotel. Ovšem v některých případech je lepší z toho udělat body dva (a umístit je do stejného objektu). Jednodušeji se pak ošetří takové věci jako je třeba rozdílný email, web stránky nebo otevírací doba.

Jestli náš ještě nějaký dotaz, bude lepší řešit to v konferenci.

Díky,
Marián
keithonearth (2016-01-22 01:14:29+00:00): I mistakenly forgot to update the source tag. I used Bing imagery for this edit, not BC Mosaic.
naoliv (2016-01-22 01:06:28+00:00): Diego, o que exatamente você está tentando representar aqui?
Gleyson Jarder (2016-01-22 17:53:58+00:00): Edifícios novos com arruamentos novos cujo Condomínio é chamado Jardim Europa
Leon K (2016-03-13 21:35:17+00:00): Has the road been moved?  because if so you should probably move the lake and power lines it now runs across.
5m4u9 (2016-01-22 07:24:12+00:00): gracias por añadir toda esta info al mapa.

En muchos casos es preferible añadir un punto al contorno de la casa... a menos toda la casa sea el taller...

Sería bueno que las direcciones o sentidos de las calles tambien las reporten como error o mejor aún editen y añadan...
carlwalsh (2023-03-06 14:45:36+00:00): Some areas are tagged as "Park" but they are the grassy median of the road -- that's definitely not what I would imagine counts as a park?
GITNE (2023-03-06 15:30:55+00:00): Right, this should have been `natural=grass`.
rmikke (2016-04-26 06:41:31+00:00): What exactly is amenity=mobile_money shop=pharmacy? If they sell medicines, it should be amenity=pharmacy instead of shop=pharmacy. Maybe two POIs are needed here.
Tomas Straupis (2016-01-23 09:20:58+00:00): Atstačiau sugadintą dviračių ir pėsčiųjų žymėjimą, t.y. grąžinau highway=path ir nuėmiau footway=sidewalk.
Plačiau čia:
https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_žemėlapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dviračiai
literan (2016-01-22 14:02:35+00:00): такие точки только с адресом (который не нужен, так как берется с периметра здания) и именем бесполезны, в базе не играют никакой роли. Я откатываю вашу правку, попробуйте еще раз, и добавьте содержательные теги, указывающие, что это (завод, общ. туалет, ресторан, офис...)
user_5359 (2017-06-26 08:13:06+00:00): Bitte beachte, dass aus Datenschutzgründen keine persönliche Informationen vom Mieter oder Eigentümer eines Hauses eingetragen werden dürfen. Ich habe den entsprechenden Eintrag bereits gelöscht.
JunosL (2024-09-20 10:56:12+00:00): Hi, I noticed that this traffic light is already mapped on the pedestrian crossing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/16373938

There, it uses highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_signals in line with the Wiki. 

Since the traffic light in question actually serves only pedestrian crossing despite the intersection of Cesta na Brdo and Nanoška, I would suggest to remove the highway=traffic_signals from this node.

To replace this information, I would propose to create a node on Nanoška ulica with traffic_sign=stop. 

What do you think?
user_5359 (2017-06-26 08:17:02+00:00): Nochmals Willkommen bei OSM! Da auch Dein zweiter Änderungssatz fast nur aus Namen und soweit erkennbar nur private Objekte kennzeichnet, habe ich auch diesen Datensatz zurückgenommen.
literan (2016-01-22 14:07:20+00:00): По поводу этой https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3959113604 точки: amenity=school это тег для общеобразовательных школ. Для всяких курсов, спорт., муз школ и прочего, (что развивает какой-то один навык) - amenity=training + training=sport/music/dance/language... OsmAnd такое рендерит!
Владимир К (2016-01-24 16:52:20+00:00): Спасибо, запомню!
Something B (2018-09-17 08:58:57+00:00): Ещё есть https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Education_2.0 хотя было отклонено.
dooley (2016-01-26 21:29:54+00:00): Warum verschiebst du die Mathildenstraße 13 auf den Bereich Kurhausdamm? Und deine Changeset-Kommentare lassen zu wünschen übrig. "Nein" ist kein aussagekräftiger Änderungskommentag.
user_5359 (2017-06-26 08:21:10+00:00): Siehe die Kommentierung Deines ersten Änderungssatzes!
user_5359 (2017-06-26 08:22:58+00:00): siehe Kommentierung Deines ersten Änderungssatzes!
Deborah O (2016-01-29 07:44:22+00:00): Fast Lane Transport & Hot Shot is not closed. Can this be edited to state that it is OPEN?
trigpoint (2016-01-22 09:46:28+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.
Thank you for your contribution, however I am not sure your change to Woodgate Drive is actually correct. There appear to be be houses on Woodgate Drive, so if motor_vehicle=no how do householders reach their properties? Is there any signage at its junction with Forest Road? 
Maybe the tag should motor_vehicle=private?
Thanks Phil
SomeoneElse (2016-01-26 12:51:39+00:00): Hi - I think that a bus stop accidentally got dragged to form part of a building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62094135 - do you mind if I move it back to where it was (or has the bus stop really moved near the building)?
Ken Carroll (2016-01-26 15:12:18+00:00): You can move the bus stop, I didn't realise I moved it.
The street is not open to general traffic.
changing to motor_vehicle=private is no problem. 
Thanks,
Ken
SomeoneElse (2016-01-26 15:47:23+00:00): Thanks, easily done.  I've moved the bus stop back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36819607 .
trigpoint (2016-01-22 16:28:18+00:00): You should have tagged this with #OSMSchools and got counted on http://harrywood.dev.openstreetmap.org/diffreader/schools/
opendcc (2016-01-22 17:29:34+00:00): Hallo,

diese Straßen laufen von Gebäudeecke zu Gebäudeecke. Bitte mal das sorgfältiger rein.
GerdP (2016-01-25 05:23:06+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
You have created a few ways with tags like
highway=yes
or
road=secondary
or 
Roads=yes
If you want to map roads, please use
highway, not road or Roads.
If you don't know the correct type of the road, please use highway=road.
See also 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-01-22 21:50:21+00:00): Why have you changed the name? This section of road is called De Grey Terrace according to the signs and the addresses of the houses on it
Mike Baggaley (2016-01-23 00:57:22+00:00): As I understand it, this part of the road is still Avenue Road, with a few houses forming De Grey Terrace, so I have moved what seemed to me to be the less important name to the alt_name field so that the name Avenue Road is contiguous. It does not seem correct to me to have a road name of De Grey Terrace, Avenue Road. If you think it would be better to swap the name and alt_name fields then that is fine by me. Perhaps name="De Grey Terrace", alt_name="Avenue Road", add:street="De Grey Terrace, Avenue Road" might be optimal?
Ewen Hill (2016-01-22 22:02:13+00:00): Leon,
   A lot of these roads were closed for well over a year after floods of 2012. The original person who closed this may have moved on from OSM or just forgotten or perhaps was not aware that it had reopened.
Vintagejhan (2016-01-25 06:57:25+00:00): 太讚了! 有空也順便數一下樓層把樓層資訊增加上去吧XD
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-01-22 21:40:21+00:00): The houses on the east side of this street are Railway View and the houses on the west side of this street are Northfield Terrace, this is clearly indicated by local street signs.
Why have you changed the street name from "Northfield Terrace / Railway View" to "Northfield Terrace"?
(There are slightly more Railway View houses on this street)
Mike Baggaley (2016-01-23 00:40:06+00:00): The street name is not Northfield Terrace / Railway View, it has two names. I have put one in the name field and the other in the alt_name field, which I believe is the correct way to handle this situation.
naoliv (2016-01-22 10:50:22+00:00): Robson, qual fonte você utilizou para obter o nome das ruas, por favor?
robsonpsreis (2016-01-22 11:01:39+00:00): A fonte foi o Mapa cedido pela Câmara Municipal de São Francisco-MG.
naoliv (2016-01-22 11:03:09+00:00): Muito bom!
Se tiver alguma dúvida é só mandar mensagem.
robsonpsreis (2016-01-22 11:05:05+00:00): Tudo Bem.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-11-02 09:15:17+00:00): Jesteś pewien, że Puszcza Solska jest tutaj? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3849276411 :-)
trigpoint (2016-01-22 12:26:24+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Do you have an office, with signs making it verifiable which can be visited by callers? It looks odd as it appears to be a residential area with roads mapped as private.
You have also create a strange relation which links to the US.
In later changes you have added a shop with a value of your website which makes your additions appear to be promoting your website.
didier2020 (2016-01-26 13:24:15+00:00): hi,
be carefull when you upload data , there is a lot off duplicated buildings.
(you can use validator with josm before upload, josm do the job)
woodpeck (2016-11-23 07:44:06+00:00): This changeset seems to add over 40,000 trees at once. May I ask what the source of this data is?
Geospatz (2016-12-14 13:41:13+00:00): Doppelte Features (z.B. Area und Node) widersprechen den Grundsätzen "ein Feature, ein OSM-Element" und eventuell auch "nicht für den Reenderer taggen". Es gibt auch Anwendungen, die sowohl mit Punkten als auch mit Flächen umgehen können und einen POI (point of interest) dann doppelt anzeigen oder auflisten.

Ich würde dort, wo der POI (z.B. Polizeirevier) das gesamte Gebäude umfasst  nur eine Fläche für POI und Gebäude verwenden. Dort wo der POI nur einen Teil des Gebäudes belegt, würde ich eine Fläche mit Adresse für das Gebäude und einen Knoten für den POI mit Kontaktdaten und anderen relevanten Tags anlegen.

Für die verständliche Enttäuschung, wenn eine Anwendung nicht wie gewünscht mit OSM-Daten umgeht, würde ich den Entwickler der Anwendung kontaktieren.
dvdhoven (2016-01-22 18:24:09+00:00): Ik heb dit pad opgenomen in de fietsknooppuntroute 10-29. Een losse route maken is een uitermate slecht idee. 
Ik ben nu al maanden  bezig dat soort dingen op te ruimen.
Het hele fietsknooppuntennetwerk bestaat uit routerelaties van knooppunt naar knooppunt.
Verder heb ik een aantal overbodige tags verwijderd van het fietspad.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
dvdhoven (2016-01-22 18:25:19+00:00): Oh ja, het fietspad eindigde op een area ipv op een weg, Ik heb het aangesloten aan de Flevoweg en het andere fietspad
Josef73 (2020-05-04 06:15:14+00:00): Hello, is this place everyday open? From Monday to Sunday?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:13:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
naoliv (2016-01-22 12:22:26+00:00): Armando, o que exatamente você quis representar aqui?
Armando Campos (2016-01-22 12:45:44+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/planalto2016/
naoliv (2016-01-22 13:02:44+00:00): É temporário o evento neste local?
A pós o término a área ainda é utilizada para airsoft?
Creio que o mais ideal seria representar esta área em outro serviço, como o http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/

Dá para você demarcar áreas e pontos, colocar descrições, fotos, etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:13:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
adrianojbr (2016-01-24 20:03:41+00:00): olá, rodrigo. só para confirmar: já está valendo o sentido único nesse trecho da alameda rio branco?

quando passei na quinta, ainda estava mão dupla e não achei nenhuma notícia falando da mudança. 

abraço.
rodrigoignaciobr (2016-01-25 10:25:35+00:00): Passei lá e quem vem da rua XV de Novembro já não pode mais virar sentido Alameda Rio Branco.
adrianojbr (2016-01-25 10:43:15+00:00): ok. estamos com o mapa bem atualizado. abraço.
adrianojbr (2016-01-26 15:16:46+00:00): só para avisar que retornei esse trecho da alameda para mão dupla, pois passei hoje ali e ainda é permitido ir nos dois sentidos.
adrianojbr (2016-01-27 18:13:46+00:00): olá, rodrigo. só para alertar: nessa alterações, você acabou alterando o nome de trecho da via expressa (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152303182/history) para "c".

abraço.
naoliv (2016-01-23 02:39:49+00:00): ClaudDadur, it's not necessary nor recommended to include "is_in" tags.
Country, state and municipality can be directly obtained using spatial indexing.
fserges (2016-08-08 12:50:29+00:00): Мне интересно насколько границы районов Оренбурга нарисованы правильно (имеются в виду эксклавы). На первый взгляд то что нарисовано не соответствует такому - http://www.orenburg.ru/power/administration/structure_of_the_administration_of_orenburg/

Конкретно вызывает вопросы Дзержинский район.
Mikhail Kalenkov (2016-08-17 18:48:39+00:00): Прошу прощения, был в отпуске без доступа к интернету.

Границы районов рисовал по постановлению Главы города Оренбурга от 23 октября 2009 г. № 7579-п "Об утверждении описания границ административного центра Оренбургской области - города Оренбурга и районов, входящих в его территорию" (с изменениями и дополнениями от 15 сентября 2010 г., 11 октября 2011 г.)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9KpzX52tWodZThLcFlpWnB1aHM/view?usp=sharing
брал его из ГАРАНТа.

Эксклавы там не описаны, но они несомненно отнесены к одному из районов. При отнесении эксклавов к районам следовал страницам с оф сайта, подобной той, что Вы указали.

Я вижу несколько эксклавов
1) Самородово - Промышленный район (следует из Вашей ссылки)
2) Бердянка - Ленинский район (следует из Вашей ссылки). Маленький прямоугольный кусочек рядом с Бердянкой отнес к Ленинскому району, как к ближайшему.
3) Загадочный кусок степи к юго-западу от Бердянки - не помню почему и к какому району я тогда отнес.
4) Краснохолм - Дзержинский район (следует из Вашей ссылки).
5) Каргала - Дзержинский район (следует из Вашей ссылки).
6) Холодные ключи всегда идут в паре с Каргалой и всюду фигурируют как часть Дзержинского района.
Владимир К (2016-01-22 15:57:22+00:00): Что за трэш? зачем куча отношений-запретов поворотов на тротуарах??? зачем запреты поворотов с тротуара на проезжую часть и обратно???
qazann (2016-01-24 11:36:00+00:00): Спасибо за отклик. Трэш попытка повлиять на ведение. На этом участке навигатор ведёт не обращая внимания на запреты поворотов и сплошные линии
Владимир К (2016-01-24 16:48:03+00:00): Ну это явно проблема навигатора. Либо ошибка в базе. Но исправлять ошибку вносом других ошибок не выход. Поэтому все запреты поворотов с тротуара на проезжую часть или наоборот я удалил. Это очевидная ошибка. Навигатор должен и так понимать, что нельзя споворачивать на тротуар на машине.  И мне кажется запретов с участием только проезжих частей слишком много, но в этом я не разбираюсь, не трогал.
qazann (2016-01-26 14:50:09+00:00): навигатор исправен. ошибка карт. запрет с тротуарами согласен а остальные необходимы. проверено на сайте в браузере осм. как бы тут скрин приделать
pyram (2016-09-17 10:36:28+00:00): Sorry, if I'm wrong, but you changed some residential roads to living_streets. You are shure, there are spezially traffic rules?
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street)
Diego Sanguinetti (2016-10-24 18:56:00+00:00): Thanks for the note. Because it's a residence place, I changed that option. Have you visited this place?
pyram (2016-10-24 21:47:18+00:00): No, I haven't. I saw it on bing ( fixing technical errors: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-73.43907&lat=-10.43082&zoom=6&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way ) and thougt it is to big/too much cars for a living_street ;-)
Otherwise I would have changed it myself.
Hjart (2016-01-22 18:35:16+00:00): Er der tale om en jordhøj eller en stensætning?
Jes Aabo (2016-01-22 18:40:28+00:00): Der er tale om en kampestens sætning oval ca 15 x 10 m med en stensætning i miden  med gravkammeret.
Stedet kaldes:  Kæmpeskoven
Det er dog ingen skov men gravhøjen er gemt i træbevoksning.
Jes Aabo (2016-01-22 18:47:48+00:00): Glemte at noter at du i øvrigt kan se stedet på TOPO 25
chillly (2016-01-24 13:00:34+00:00): This looks like a mass edit, and not the first. Where was this discussed?
SomeoneElse (2016-01-27 02:25:28+00:00): (for anyone thinking of reverting) the changes in the Chesterfield/Mansfield area in this changeset seem OK.  

Unnecessary, probably, but unlike some of the other changes in this sequence they don't actually make the data wrong.
Hjart (2016-01-22 17:56:30+00:00): Jeg har flyttet adressen tilbage på plads og tegnet en adgangsvej til den
oeeeiouoaea (2016-01-23 12:07:47+00:00): Ok. Tak. Problemet er, at hvis man søger en rute /'direction' fra adressen bruges ikke altid adgangsvejen via Oscar Ellingersvej. Istedet vises en rute, som i virkeligheden går igennem baghaver og over adskillige helt lukkede hegn (til stikvej fra Tesdorfsvej). Er der en måde at få det rettet?
Hjart (2016-01-23 17:00:44+00:00): Jeg kan godt se hvad du mener. Nu ved jeg ikke lige hvilken navigationsmaskine du bruger, men de fleste skal lige have noget tid til at opdatere deres databaser (deres kopier af vores data). Vent nogle dage og prøv så igen.
SomeoneElse (2016-01-23 00:32:46+00:00): In here you have created a duplicate Nags Head https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318374093 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4298180 .  I suspect that this changeset may need to be reverted too.
will_p (2016-01-22 19:42:15+00:00): Hi,

What was your intention here? - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327955126/history  

You have tagged the takeaway as both open and disused. Which is correct?
SomeoneElse (2016-01-23 00:15:57+00:00): I mapped that bit of Clay Cross High Street not that long ago, and it looked pretty shut then - still set up internally as a fast food place, unopened mail on the doormat and a "fast food place available" sign in the window.  I'd be surprised if someone has turned it around and opened it since then :)
SomeoneElse (2016-01-23 00:19:18+00:00): Also, I'd suggest reading http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments - "fixing amenities" doesn't really explain what changes you made and what the source was.
SomeoneElse (2016-01-23 00:24:02+00:00): Also also, you've duplicated the Pattenmakers Arms http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387142831 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62065885 and dredged up some old tags and put them on the building.  

I'll have to revert this, but can you please explain exactly what you're trying to do here?
SomeoneElse (2016-01-23 00:29:45+00:00): For info, reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36750809 .
Mloni (2016-11-06 15:49:12+00:00): Hallo,
wie kommst du dazu in der Ottobrunner Straße mittels bicycle=use_sidepath eine Radbegbenutzungspflicht einzutragen die hier  bereits vor 2-3 Jahren aufgehoben wurde. Es wäre schön wenn du nur taggen würdest was du auch selbst (zeitnah) vor Ort beobachtet hast.
Grüße Mloni
sergeybe (2016-02-01 17:11:42+00:00): Ylia7, не устраивайте войну правок. Эта площадь никогда не называлась по украински.
Kris Anselmo (2016-01-26 22:58:22+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention lorsque vous ajoutez un nouveau chemin via une trace gps. Vous ne pouvez pas l'importer en ignorant ce qui existe déjà. C'est notamment le cas pour ce sentier qui se superpose par endroit à des sentiers existant: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392800007

De plus le tag "highway=cycleway" (piste cyclable) me semble inapproprié sur ces sentiers ou pistes en forêt. Je vous invite à consulter la page suivante: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=fr
Je me trompe peut-être mais le tag "access=no" ne semble pas pertinent sur ces sentiers de VTT  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=no?uselang=fr
HPman83 (2016-01-27 07:38:02+00:00): Bonjour,
le sentier est parrallele a la piste a moins de 50cms de celle ci.
De plus il n'y a pas de tags pour designer un sentier qui est reservé a l'usage des VTT autre que Cycleway. ce type de chemin est optimisé pour les vélo et n'est pas fait pour etre facilement passable a pieds.
Sanderd17 (2016-01-24 16:00:31+00:00): Hi, I was wondering how ENEO is related to this, is this an import of data from ENEO?

Could you please join the discussion on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import
Sanderd17 (2016-01-24 16:03:37+00:00): Hi, I see you fixed some issues in this region. Do you have more info on what went wrong?

Would you want to join the discussions at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_landuse_import and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import

Thanks
didier2020 (2016-01-24 18:09:33+00:00): i detect with osmose 
duplicated buidlings with this users
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kamone
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/angelin%20zegha
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/laureane

ans duplicated ways landuse with this users
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bdiscoe
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/snapping
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mr%20UMM

i try to fix it . 
If it's bad import, i had to stop (this job is for dwg)
dgitto (2016-01-29 07:43:55+00:00): Però così il routing (a piedi) non funziona. E anche dalla Ruga del Molo non c'è collegamento con la piazza. Non fa niente?
Del resto la strada esiste mi pare, sono i veicoli che non possono passare. ma i pedoni e i mezzi di soccorso sì.
joecow (2016-01-29 09:19:37+00:00): Ci sono passato il weekend scorso, c'è un accesso per mezzi autorizzati, ma nessuna strada. Inserisco una pedestrian a collegamento delle altre per il routing
malenki (2016-01-22 22:18:46+00:00): Hallo DTH1985, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Da diese deine Bearbeitung nicht sonderlich hilfreich war, hat user_5359 sie bereits wieder entfernt – offenbar kommentarlos, deshalb will ich etwas dazu sagen.
Objekte nur mit einem beschreibenden Namen einzutragen hat wenig Wert. Wenn man beispielsweise einen Gebäudeumriss hat und "name=Gebäude mit Hausnummer 4 in der Fritz-Reuter-Straße" daran schreibt, wird keine einzige OSM-basierte Karte dies jemals anzeigen. Wenn man es dagegen so einträgt wie hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89531284
bekommt man eine Karte, die dGebäude und Hausnummer zeigt.
Mit der "Querungsinsel" ist das genauso. Wenn du sie eintragen willst, such nach "Fußgängerüberweg" in den Vorlagen des Editors und wähle dann die entsprechenden Werte aus.
Zu dem Schulweg: Gehstrecken und private Wanderrouten, die nicht zu sehen oder ausgeschildert sind, sollten in OSM nicht eingetragen werden. Was eingetragen wird, sollte vor Ort verifizierbar sein.
Viele Grüße aus der Freiberger Ecke
malenki
Andrea Musuruane (2016-01-23 17:55:50+00:00): Il nome non è corretto. Se la fontana non ha un nome, non deve essere specificato. Un nome è, per esempio"Fontata di Trevi". Inoltre l'uso di outdoor e indoor è ridondante e si assume che la fontana sia all'aperto.
Alecs01 (2016-01-23 19:08:57+00:00): Mi sembra strano anche access=no su una strada provinciale e l'altra way senza tags. Luca, benvenuto su OSM innanzitutto!, cosa intendevi mappare in questo changeset?