piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Cooper2021 (2021-07-05 14:43:21+00:00): Perfect, bedankt voor de assistentie. Hoelang duur het vooraleer de aanpassingen actief zijn?
Jakka (2021-07-05 14:50:13+00:00): zo goed als direct. ctrl+F5 drukken om je schermdate te hernieuwen. Maar elk zoom niveau doet dat op andere tijdstippen ontlasten servers ;)
Cooper2021 (2021-07-05 14:50:43+00:00): Prima, top. Fijne dag verder.
Dustin C (2021-07-21 21:34:46+00:00): Hi,

I tagged the cycletrack on the road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6410233. So now the same infrastructure is represented twice. We need to decide which to use. Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Cycle_tracks, a separate way or an attribute of the road are both valid methods -- the separation here is just flex posts and striping. Do you have reason to prefer using a separate way? For the software I work on, attributes of the road are much easier to reason about, so I'm going to have to heuristically snap a separate way on my end.

This is a common problem, by the way -- another example of bike paths marked twice is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948577962 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/621426647. It's quite a headache to fix. I know the default carto renderer doesn't show cycle infra; that's why I've built http://abstreet.s3-website.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/0.2.52/osm_viewer.html?system/us/seattle/maps/downtown.bin&--cam=20.34/47.61504/-122.33544 to help visualize things like this.

I'd love for all the mappers around Seattle to settle on a consistent style for tagging bike infra, so I can stop trying to handle both cases in my software.

Thanks,
-Dustin
austinsnow (2021-07-22 14:52:52+00:00): I hear you there. It definitely is a struggle figuring out how to map these. I'm all for a consistent style too.

I am ambivalent about how to map one-way cycleways that are only mildly separated from traffic with plastic bollards, like the 8th Ave example. I think including the cycle info on the street itself can be fine (though it does make it hard to map tricky bits, like where the 8th Ave cycleway crosses from left to right at Virginia).

However, I think anytime there is a two-way cycleway separated from traffic (as in this case, or the 2nd Ave downtown cycletrack), the bike infrastructure should have its own way. That seems consistent with the first recommendation for these situations as noted on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle.

With this specific example, I would also note there is more separation than just striping/posts in some areas, like the intersection at Ravenna Ave and also at N 64th.

- Marlan
Dustin C (2021-07-23 19:08:10+00:00): Using separate ways to tag more detail about complex crossings makes sense to me. I deleted the duplicate tags on the road in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107444042. I'll keep iterating on my end to snap the separate path to the road and create a simple representation for my purposes. I'm also going to be experimenting with tagging the width and type of buffer around cycleways soon; I'll CC you on those changesets. Thanks for your mapping!
AkuAnakTimur (2021-07-06 15:53:06+00:00): There's already one Jalan Stesen Sentral 5 opposite the building

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145077566
Govula (2021-07-08 07:45:29+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Thanks for the feedback. will not add street names to service roads going forward
angys (2021-07-05 22:23:24+00:00): fIX
harika_d (2021-07-08 07:30:33+00:00): Hi angys

Thanks for fixing this
bxl-forever (2021-07-08 14:08:18+00:00): Thanks for this one.  I was planning to survey it today, because I thought not all of those streets were connected to the paths around of the building.  Thanks for having visited the place and checked, that saved me some survey time. :-)
JhowieNitnek (2021-07-09 14:14:57+00:00): Hi no problem but I think it still would be handy to go crack it out. I didn't have the time to go look at everything (sorry for my late answer I only just saw the message)
Self-Perfection (2021-07-05 18:51:58+00:00): Hi!

Kudos for still mapping occasionally!
a1exus (2021-10-07 13:24:42+00:00): Same to you :)
angys (2021-07-05 17:32:45+00:00): Hello Mamat, parking alley normally dont have a name ok?
angys (2021-07-05 18:33:23+00:00): Fixed
shireesha_u (2021-07-08 07:58:22+00:00): Hi angys

Going forward will not add names to parking lot segments. Thanks for the feedback
Luzandro (2023-03-28 17:32:10+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier zwar geschrieben "Ampel ergänzt", aber bei den Fußgänger- und Radfahrerübergängen tatsächlich crossing=traffic_signals durch crossing=marked ersetzt, was bedeuten würde, dass die Übergänge eben gerade nicht ampelgeregelt sind

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:crossing%3Dmarked
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107445154
Futur3r (2021-07-06 13:52:45+00:00): Salut,

les trottoirs ne sont pas à tracer dans osm !
Ils font parti de la voie, tout comme les bandes cyclables.

Tu peux les taguer directement sur la voie avec la clé sidewalk=*. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:sidewalk .

Sauf à certains endroits quand le trottoir se sépare de la voie en un chemin.

Merci pour ta contribution :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107445274
currybum (2021-07-05 16:23:52+00:00): I'm not sure these should have been deleted; private property can (and should) still be mapped. The fact the trails are not accessible should be added with a tag, but the trails shouldn't be outright removed.
Lee Carré (2022-03-14 04:04:04+00:00): ▪︎smaller changeset areas: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
▪︎source?
▪︎your changeset comment is misleading, since you also added a node to the islands to the SW (I forget which name, now) tagging it as place=island — what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Re place=island
No need to add a node; just tag the island's outline way.
Lee Carré (2022-03-14 04:06:18+00:00): The changes at the Burger Bar / Kiosk look OK, though.
Kevin Kofler (2021-09-02 11:02:58+00:00): Leider hast du mit deiner Änderung eine Lücke bzw. einen Sprung in der 94A-Busrouten-Relation eingeführt. Ich habe das Problem ausgebessert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110613097
plaoureux (2021-07-05 17:13:50+00:00): The name is Polsky en not Spolsky!
nitram1234 (2021-07-06 08:28:23+00:00): Hi! Great job with the editing. In the future, could you be careful to not include two distant edits in the same changeset? That would greatly help on the history panel to see where the latest changes have been made. 

Thanks for your help, cheers!
plaoureux (2021-07-06 09:40:03+00:00): That was my first time as editor on openstreetmap.. not the first time as user... But the name has not changed yet on the map. Review needed?
nitram1234 (2021-07-06 10:08:32+00:00): Hi @plaoureux - the change to the map takes anywhere from a few minutes to a few days to be shown on the map. However, some map servers are faster at incorporating the changes so you could for instance take a look at osm.ch. 

In the future, please submit 1 changeset in each local region where you want to change something. This way, others can see your edits more easily! 

Cheers
ovruni (2021-07-05 16:55:49+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado un pequeño poblado (menos de 200) a village que se encuentra destinada a pueblos mas grandes, por este motivo he restaurado la etiqueta anterior.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
AkuAnakTimur (2021-07-05 15:16:21+00:00): Hello. Why a monorail line was renamed instead?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24405045
Govula (2021-07-08 07:43:49+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Incorrectly edited the monorail segment. Thanks for sharing the feedback. Will be careful next time
iWowik (2021-07-06 10:49:25+00:00): День добрый!
Ка догадаться что такое 
addr:street=Школьная 

Это Школьная аллея, Школьная площадь или Школьная набережная?
iWowik (2021-07-08 06:18:05+00:00): Здравствуйте!
 А что такое Школьная (да и Солнечная)?
Школьная аллея, Школьная площадь, Школьная набережная, или Школьная линия?
Как все должны догадываться?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961634528/history
spely (2021-07-08 10:54:04+00:00): как будут догадываться пассивно-агрессивные клоуны типа тебя мне не интересно.
исправлю как будет время.
iWowik (2021-07-08 16:08:13+00:00): Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании дорог
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки за вами исправлять или откатывать
Futur3r (2021-07-06 14:07:53+00:00): Bonjour,

le lac existe déjà et il faut utiliser ces tags sur un polygone.

Merci pour ta contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107447212
Futur3r (2021-07-06 14:06:28+00:00): Bonjour,

le plan d'eau existe déjà.

Il faut créer un polygone pour ce genre de tag.

Merci pour ta contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107447386
ovruni (2021-07-05 17:04:33+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios parece se ha agregado un techo que ya no se encuentra, en las imágenes de Maxar, que son las mas actuales ya no se muestra, por este motivo lo he retirado.
Saludos
rdacardenas (2021-07-05 20:30:57+00:00): Hola, gracias por la colaboración y el dato de las imágenes de Maxar, lo tomaré como referencia a partir de ahora.
ALu68 (2021-07-06 18:07:48+00:00): Hallo rms_MKRA,

du hast bei dieser Änderung die stop_position von einem Knoten auf einen anderen Knoten verlegt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8895366371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/860227526/history

Ohne Anpassung der Wege der Relation wird bei  der PTNA eine Fehlermeldung "PTv2 Route: der erste Punkt des Weges ist keine 'stop_position' dieser Route" ausgegeben: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-AVV-Analysis.diff.html#A2.2.2.5
Linie 412 (ebenso 400 und weitere)

Desweiteren hast du den Key ref:IFOPT=de:09772:4410:0:A nicht übertragen.

Dies ist auch der Fall bei anderen Knoten von weiteren Änderungssätzen bzw. wurde der Key ref:IFOPT entfernt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/880526029/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5138175625/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5138324788/history

Was ist der Grund dafür?

Gruß.
rms_MKRA (2021-07-08 10:11:02+00:00): Hallo ALu68, 

vielen Dank für deine Anmerkung, da ist mir ein Fehler passiert, den ich korrigieren werde.  

Auch die ref:IFOPT der anderen Knoten werde ich noch hinzufügen. 

Viele Grüße!
j numminen (2021-07-06 13:04:35+00:00): I have reverted your contribution because I suspect the information was false.
gscholz (2021-07-19 04:34:59+00:00): Hi JAS,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Bandeirantes" and "Braúnas":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-43.99844&lat=-19.85359&zoom=15

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107450154

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
RicoElectrico (2021-12-09 14:37:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2965171
fabiotofy (2021-07-13 17:28:57+00:00): Si chiama semplicemente "MALGA" ? Non abbiamo qualcosa di più personale al posto appena creato ? Grazie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107450400
ivanbranco (2024-04-29 23:29:15+00:00): Hi Acionnae,

what's the meaning of building=geom? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/62979021
Cartographer10 (2021-07-06 16:33:51+00:00): Hey,

Je hebt dit pand [1] opgesplitst. In de bag [2] staat dit echter nog als 1 pand. Nu staan er 2 panden in OSM met het zelfde BAG id, vandaar dat ik even reageer. Als je echt denkt dat het niet klopt dan kun je in de bagviewer een terugmelding doen (het knopje onder ze in/uitzoom knoppen). Dan kijkt het kadaster er na

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961652514
[2] https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/#?geometry.x=173785.30890625&geometry.y=443127.7948602&zoomlevel=7&objectId=0289100000001739&detailsObjectId=0289010000002951
helicase (2021-07-06 17:12:17+00:00): Ik zal voor de zekerheid nog 's ter plaatse checken.
MarbleRock (2021-07-05 16:26:10+00:00): *Novska - Popovača
Lyon-St-Clair (2021-07-06 05:46:12+00:00): Bonjour, donc c'est bien cet été que la station Palettes va perdre sa boucle et prendre sa nouvelle configuration et provoquer l'inversion des lignes 12 et 18 à la rentrée ?
b_l (2021-07-06 06:09:35+00:00): Je suis passé hier dans le secteur. La caténaire dans la boucle a été démontée et les aiguillages à Palettes ont été sciées. On pourrait presque déjà la supprimer.

Les changements sur le réseau TPG ont déjà eu lieu dimanche : https://www.tpg.ch/fr/nouveautes-sur-le-reseau-des-le-4-juillet-2021
Lyon-St-Clair (2021-07-06 06:15:22+00:00): Salut, d'accord et bien je propose déjà qu'on mette un polygone "zone de construction" sur le secteur, en supposant aussi que le parking à vélo et le mobilier de la station actuelle a lui aussi sauté ?
b_l (2021-07-06 06:29:42+00:00): Oui, tu peux mettre un polygone "zone de construction"
Eberth (2021-07-05 16:56:41+00:00): Deine Quelle für die Hausnummern ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf für OpenStreetMap nicht genutzt werden. 
Bitte mache alle Änderungssätze, für die Du Karten des LVermGeo benutzt hast, rückgängig. 
Thomas
sanchi (2021-07-06 14:15:49+00:00): Buenas
Has puesto en todas los sitios que se cruza el río con un camino o carretera ford=yes. Esto es incorrecto. Si no se sabe cómo cruzan no se deben unir los puntos del río con las carreteras que crucen. 
Solo hay que añadir ford=yes cuando realmente lo son y si es un puente no van unidas y se añade a la vía en el trozo del puente bridge=yes.
Si no se sabe se dejan por separado sin dibujar ningún nodo que las una.
Saludos.
angys (2021-07-05 16:49:05+00:00): HEY LALAUN SEHALA is one way road, not ROAD NAME
angys (2021-07-05 17:08:14+00:00): I already fix for you, please BE CAREFUL next time
angys (2021-07-05 17:22:55+00:00): Fixed
angys (2021-07-05 17:22:45+00:00): wrong name
fkv (2021-10-13 22:38:39+00:00): Das ist nicht meine Gegend, aber nur zur Info: Keys mit ..._1, ..._2 usw. wurden durch ein angenommenes Proposal für deprecated erklärt. Richtig ist demnach alt_name="Preberloch;Bischofswandloch" (oder auch mit Leerzeichen nach dem Strichpunkt).
kuhni74 (2021-10-14 11:55:16+00:00): Danke! Das war mir entgangen, ich habe leider wohl schon ziemlich oft solche weiteren alt_name_X eingegeben...
Dale_M (2024-06-12 20:35:57+00:00): @GinaroZ You've used the Esri World Imagery, but how did you find the borders of the land? Particularly I'm interested in Puddle Wood.
GinaroZ (2024-06-13 16:55:11+00:00): Hi, this was a while ago, you can see what I changed here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107452137
Didn't really change the wood much, assuming it was already mapped either from aerial imagery or OS street view?
I have just updated the south part of the wood to account for the removal of trees though.
DressyPear4 (2021-07-05 19:54:21+00:00): Olá, não adicione nomes genéricos,
use o campo "descrição"
TrekClimbing (2021-08-25 21:41:49+00:00): Hi James. Another time it might be better to split the service road in two, make them both drives by adding service=driveway and access=private. You could also add noexit=yes to the end nodes so someone else doesn't try and join them together again! I have looked at this place before but can't remember it and can't see it well from imagery so haven't done this. 
Hope that helps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107452539
blackboxlogic (2021-07-09 15:48:48+00:00): Thanks for adding these roads. Two issues: the roads overlapped themselves, and you connected the road to the power line. I've fixed them in change 107714262
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107453127
user_3022894 (2021-07-07 16:16:11+00:00): Hi Lothar,

wollte nur kurz nachfragen, ob du dir sicher bist, dass dieses Straßenstück hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34108711/
eine Wohnstraße (rsidential) sein soll, wo doch die verbindenden Stücke alle "tertiary" sind?

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Lodda (2021-07-08 18:26:33+00:00): Habe es geändert.
Lothar
user_3022894 (2021-07-09 11:07:59+00:00): Super, danke dir :-)
trial (2021-07-06 15:47:54+00:00): Bonjour, l'usage est de mettre en path les chemins piétons et cycle (ni footway ni cycleway).
trial (2021-07-06 15:41:25+00:00): Pourquoi diable avoir ajouté covered=yes alors que rien n'indique que ce chemin d'accès est couvert. Une fausse manip ?
GinaroZ (2021-07-06 16:30:21+00:00): Maybe these shouldn't be tracks?
LySioS (2021-07-05 21:24:11+00:00): Salut hoancat,
OSMcha n'est pas content que tu aies viré les tags buidlings sur les postes enedis. C'est un faux positif ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107455684
hoancat (2021-07-06 14:32:29+00:00): Bien vu, je pensais que ce tag était obsolète lorsqu'on utilisait power=distribution.
J'ai corrigé ça en ajoutant building=service aux postes électriques que j'avais ajouté (et à certains autres).
4004 (2021-07-07 22:26:58+00:00): lanes:backward это когда одна линия дороги для обоих направлений
4004 (2021-07-07 22:28:49+00:00): ну и я там не был, но не совсем понимаю, как на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/924857893 может быть прямо и направо, там же вроде 1 возможный съезд (through)?
Pavelfantik (2021-07-08 18:56:53+00:00): не знаю откуда это тут вылезло. нужно еще внимательно поработать над развязкой
4004 (2021-07-08 20:01:56+00:00): да, я тоже планирую гаишное видео глянуть. когда нибудь. там глядишь, и мапиллари снимут
Pavelfantik (2021-07-14 16:22:17+00:00): убрал лишние теги, проставил количество полос. нужно еще ровнять по трекам и ограничения скорости выставить. и пешеходные и вело связи допиливать
4004 (2021-07-14 19:32:37+00:00): ок. треки может уже на страве какие есть, не смотрел еще
DressyPear4 (2021-07-05 19:26:39+00:00): Olá, usando essas tags a meu ver o mapa fica muito poluído visualmente, trocando "place=farm" por "building=yes" e "name" por "ref", teria algum impacto nesse projeto?
Visualmente não iriam aparecer mas os dados seriam mantidos
Pozzer (2021-07-05 20:30:30+00:00): Olá, agradeço seu comentário. Na verdade essa é a única forma com que a informação pode ser buscada pelos sistemas de chamada da Polícia Militar e Bombeiros, que usam o OSM como mapa padrão, somente tendo a informação do código da fazenda "embutida" na mapa é que eles conseguem localizar e traçar rota até o local. Então não vejo outra forma de fazer isso senão da forma que fazemos.
sebkur (2021-08-28 17:38:46+00:00): Hier ist aus der Landmasse (land_area=administrative) des Landkreises Cuxhaven (versehentlich) eine Grenzrelation geworden (boundary=administrative) 

Die ehemalige Landmasse: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3500495

Es gab schon vorher eine Grenzrelation für den Landkreis Cuxhaven:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2083535

Jetzt gibt es zweimal Landkreis Cuxhaven mit boundary=administrative

Ich denke die ursprüngliche Landmasse sollte wieder in eine solche zurück gewandelt werden.

Viele Grüße
ChrissW-R1 (2021-08-29 10:16:51+00:00): Absolut richtig erkannt.
Da an der "alten" Landmasse auch Tag für eine administrative Grenze hingen, habe ich es vermeintlich "korrigiert". Habe nun aus der falschen Grenze wieder eine Landmasse gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110406335

Danke für den Hinweis.
sebkur (2021-08-29 11:49:08+00:00): Super, danke dir!
mikini (2021-07-10 08:57:22+00:00): Halløjsa.
Hvorfor tilretter du ikke den eksisterende mast der er placeret få meter væk (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8843353149) i stedet for at tilføje en dublet?

Det er jo meningen vi skal samarbejde om et fælles kort, ikke skabe oprydningsarbejde for hinanden.

-- 
Hilsner,
Mikkel
LarsBG (2021-07-10 20:12:38+00:00): OMG jeg har lavet en fejl. 

Hvordan sådanne fejl kan ske er at jeg ikke har fået downloaded områder der er rettet. Dette er dumt men dog en menneskelig fejl.
Anden mulighed var at jeg at jeg vil lave splid og gøre det med vilje Det er dog ikke hvad der er sket i dette tilfælde.

En anden gang kan du sende en besked og så skal jeg nok selv rette fejlen.

Jeg beklager meget, Og vil gøre alt for at det aldrig kommer til at ske igen.
subflux (2021-07-05 20:12:09+00:00): Thank you! Looks like iD took my typing 'Perth' to attempt to navigate and turned Perth AUS into a Pet shop! Crazy stuff.
ivanbranco (2021-07-22 16:43:02+00:00): Hi danianigabriel,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8895717972

I think there's a problem with this node tags, can you fix it?
ivanbranco (2021-09-15 19:39:46+00:00): I see you're still active, but never replied. I'm gonna delete the tag, you can add it again as diet:vegetarian=yes or diet:vegetarian=only based on your knowledge if you want.
un-logic (2021-07-05 19:12:13+00:00): Привет! 
Если "Сарай" - это не уникальное название этой постройки, то лучше в теге name не указывать ничего, а вместо этого 
уточнить тип здания, например, амбар, подробности в вики: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:building=barn
Добро пожаловать в сообщество OSM! Продолжайте пополнять карту.
mavl (2021-07-06 13:31:07+00:00): Здравствуйте, все.  
Этот пакет правок добавляет тег building:levels=1. Название "Сарай" на здании уже было до этого.
un-logic (2021-07-16 08:03:03+00:00): Извиняюсь, недосмотрел, видимо, меня сбило с толку название пакета правок "назначение здания", а в историю я заглянуть позабыл.
Всё же, если ты местный, можешь заняться и такими, уточняющими правками.
Удачи!
Glassman (2021-07-05 19:52:23+00:00): Instead of motor_vehicle=no, I'd recommend access=destination which allows routers to bring friends and packages to the house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107456640
tux67 (2021-07-06 06:34:38+00:00): Hi, Wanderwegrelation des X4 nach dem Split noch intakt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107456850
Jlaba (2021-07-11 13:20:17+00:00): Intakt ja, und jetzt noch besser: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107456850
trial (2021-07-06 15:29:38+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu dans OpenStreetMap oneway=no est la valeur par défaut, si la rue est passée de sens unique à double sens, il suffit de supprimer le couple attribut-valeur.
Je vous/te laisse corriger.
trial (2021-07-06 15:30:45+00:00): cycleway=opposite sur une voie à double sens n'a pas de sens.
literan (2021-07-06 18:50:46+00:00): а этот Скай Хаус случаем еще не построен?
augxcgrwxo (2021-07-08 06:01:09+00:00): к сожалению про остальные дома тяжело сказать. Все за забором и закрыто баннерами на уровне лица. Который я обновил дом, там весит проводка недоделанная и панели отделочные еще не стоят. высокие башни выглядят на 80-95% готовые, но территория вокруг них точно стройплощадка.
literan (2021-07-08 06:46:07+00:00): ясно, просто показалось на спутнике, что там уже благоустройство сделали
Inigo_Maptoya (2021-08-31 16:19:10+00:00): Hello, 
I noticed you have broken several restrictions by combining sections of roads. It looks like you may need to revert your changes or remove these restrictions if they are not correct.

Hola, 
Noté que ha roto varias restricciones al combinar secciones de carreteras. Parece que es posible que deba revertir los cambios o eliminar estas restricciones si no son correctas.
DressyPear4 (2021-07-05 19:30:49+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta, considere apenas a primeira letra de cada palavra em maiúsculo.
Evite abreviações também.