piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Karsten Natebus (2018-12-29 12:14:44+00:00): Hallo Bahntech,
Du taggst nicht mehr vorhandene Bahnanlagen und Industriegebiete, teilweise existieren diese schon jahrzehnte nicht mehr. Das macht für mich keinen Sinn. Kannst Du mir kurz die Hintergründe erläutern? Gruß Karsten
paulbiv (2017-12-28 22:59:50+00:00): Hi SupersonicTC and welcome. I've made the houses rectangles and where I could, I've 'terraced' them so individual houses are separate (with shared corners/nodes). The UK chapter of OSM runs quarterly projects, and a recent one has been addresses. Link to OSM wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Quarterly_Project. I've added some addresses in Parkwood shopping centre (e.g. Parkwood Cafe) as part of an earlier project mapping places with Food Hygiene records, so these should be visible in iD. Good luck and welcome.
eggie (2017-12-28 19:31:21+00:00): Gebouwen zelf krijgen in de regel geen adres. Die  staat als het goed is al op de adresnode.
Jakka (2017-12-28 19:41:36+00:00): Wat bedoel je met ele? ele = niveau boven ze spiegel http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele?uselang=nl
viloan (2017-12-28 19:09:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2017-12-28 20:18:28+00:00): Graag concreet commentaar.. various changes is wat vaag voor andere mappers.
Dus recycling verplaatst... denk per ongeluk want bevindt zich nu midden op de Sperwersingel.. Graag reactie
ElvenAluthar (2017-12-28 20:32:56+00:00): Recycling is inderdaad per ongeluk verplaatst. Nu ben ik op zoek waar deze dan eerst stond...
eggie (2017-12-28 20:44:23+00:00): Hier kun je zien waar je Sternlaan 18 heen hebt verplaatst. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54991376
en hier waar je de recycling heen hebt verplaatst
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54991516
Doe je het zelf?
ElvenAluthar (2017-12-28 21:01:24+00:00): Gecorrigeerd in Changeset 54993858
eggie (2017-12-28 21:37:36+00:00): Klopt.. Verplaatsen gebeurt heel snel als je de kaart verschuift met editor  iD
Jakka (2017-12-28 19:38:54+00:00): Witte gietijzeren brug moet op een object staan en niet los in het water. Deze samen gevoegd op de brug.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54992062#map=19/51.21438/4.26506&layers=N
highflyer74 (2017-12-29 06:19:28+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Die Feuerwehr war bereits erfasst (allerdings nicht auf dem Gebäude, sondern auf der umgebenden Fläche). Ich habe die Daten jetzt auf dem Gebäude zusammengeführt, um weitere Verwirrung zu vermeiden. Schau Dir, wenn Du editierst, am besten immer genau die umgebenden Objekte an. 

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
suniala (2017-12-28 19:55:39+00:00): Taisin lisätä pyöräreittirelaatiot väärin. Perun muutokset ja teen sitten uusiksi.
literan (2017-12-29 10:29:59+00:00): Библиотека МГИМО доступна для человека с улицы? Уверен, что нет, поэтому amenity=library оттуда уберу (это тег для публичных объектов, он не ставится на домашние библиотеки, библиотеки при дирекциях заводов и т.п.)
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:15:45+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
dikkeknodel (2018-04-04 09:32:01+00:00): Hallo Pudu,
In diese Änderung hast du piste tags zugefügt in eine MTB Route Relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1591489). Ich glaube das ist eine Verirrung. Ich glaube es soll eine neue Relation sein ahnlich wie zum Beispiel der Uetliberg Schlittelweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/48144). 
Kannst du das mal nachschauen? 
Liebe Grüsse, dikkeknodel
Pudu (2018-04-15 18:18:57+00:00): Hallo Dikkenodel
Danke für den Hinweis. Es war ein Versehen.  Wollte eigentlich das Wayset https://slopes.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=196957201&type=wayset besser kennzeichnen...
Habe die MTB-Route korrigiert.
Gruess Pudu
dikkeknodel (2018-04-16 09:59:21+00:00): Hallo Pudu,
Danke für die Korrektur.
Liebe Grüsse, dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-05-07 09:02:37+00:00): Hallo Pudu,
Veilleicht hast du auch zu viele Brücke 'gebaut' :-). Kannst du dir diese mal anschauen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196957200
Ich bin dort selbst (noch) nicht gewesen, aber auf die Satelitenbilden seht es aus ob da keine Brücke ist.
Liebe Grüsse, dikkeknodel
santamariense (2017-12-29 01:38:40+00:00): Por que você deletou a Champs Elysées? Ela não existe mais?
M!dgard (2018-01-18 11:19:13+00:00): Een highway=cycleway (Fietspad) is per definitie toegankelijk voor fietsers, bicycle=yes is dan ook meestal niet nodig.

In deze wijzigingenset maak je per ongeluk een knooppunt aan op het Willemspark, en versleep je per ongeluk het punt voor adres Achtmeilaan 28. Dat heb ik nu gecorrigeerd. Pas dus op dat je niet per ongeluk dubbelklikt op dingen en dat je niet per ongeluk een node versleept als je in de kaart wil bewegen.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-03-01 18:34:29+00:00): Você transofrmou algumas vias em primárias. Vias que não são pavimentadas. REtornei ao estado anterior.
FrancyskoMarkes (2018-03-05 19:56:14+00:00): Beleza amigo. agradeço por corrigir.
Enock4seth (2018-01-07 19:42:04+00:00): Awesome! That sounds very cool ;-). Thanks
Piz Pachific (2017-12-29 00:43:15+00:00): Habe deine Daten etwas verbessert. Siehe Changeset 54997628 (http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=54997628). Danke trotzdem ;-)
Alecs01 (2018-01-05 09:51:23+00:00): Reverted
ndm (2017-12-29 00:57:28+00:00): I think it's better to leave the name until signage is removed from the shop - as it's still a useful navigable piece of information.
DaveF (2017-12-29 01:37:09+00:00): I've left the name (with the 'disused:' prefix) so it's still searchable; which is useful when adding its replacement in OSM.

'Name' is still, unfortunately, rendered, even though 'shop' is prefixed with 'disused:', This gives the appearance as if it's still open on the 'standard' map, which is a clear failure in the rendering, but I gave up years ago on hoping those who believe they're in charge of OSM:Carto of listening to logic & common sense.

I look forward to this (& non-rendering of disused bridges) being corrected in UK:carto.
ndm (2017-12-29 10:47:54+00:00): The whole point was to keep the name rendered -- if it still has external signage.

I note that http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused: doesn't mention disused:name -- are you it's still searchable?
Milwen (2017-12-28 20:41:45+00:00): Wrong changeset comment. Saved by mistake.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
Alecs01 (2018-01-05 09:51:08+00:00): Reverted
M!dgard (2018-01-18 10:22:26+00:00): Op een footway ("Wandelpad") is het niet nodig access=no ("Gebruik toegelaten voor algemeen") en foot=yes te zetten. Dat wordt al geïmpliceerd. Ik zie dat het bewerkingsprogramma iD dit niet duidelijk maakt, ik zal kijken of dit verbeterd kan worden.

Meer info over toegangsbeperkingen kan je op de wiki vinden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
M!dgard (2018-01-18 10:23:18+00:00): In het bijzonder op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
5m4u9 (2017-12-29 06:00:30+00:00): hola, ¡bienvenida/o! y gracias por contribuir en el mapa :)
//
los cambios que hiciste en el area del parque y plaza no son correctos, porque siempre queremos visualizar las areas y no solo un punto, si conoces el nombre de la plaza o del parque hay que ponerlo, sino no es necesario hasta conocerlo
GerdP (2017-12-29 14:50:31+00:00): Hi!
You've created a few highway=driveway + area=yes here. This is a very unusual tagging. I assume you meant highway=service + service=driveway + area=yes ?
sixfoureight (2018-01-03 21:37:55+00:00): thanks
marcioaguiar (2018-01-02 14:30:52+00:00): Jamerson, por favor evite marcar essas áreas como bairro. Salvador Lira não se trata de um bairro, mas um conjunto e poderia ser marcado como neighbourhood. Além disso você está marcando uma área que não condiz com a área do conjunto.
Jamerson Tiago (2018-01-02 14:39:09+00:00): certo, não sabia que se tratava de de um conjunto, desconsiderar as demais alterações sobre conjuntos.
marcioaguiar (2018-01-02 14:27:24+00:00): Jamerson, o que é esse Cambuci? Você marcou essa área como um bairro. Estou removendo essa marcação, pois sei que não se trata de um bairro. O que você estava querendo mapear?
Jamerson Tiago (2018-01-02 14:58:18+00:00): Inserir uma região que aqui é conhecida como Bairro, igualmente como o Salvador Lyra e os demais citados em outros posts.
M!dgard (2018-01-18 11:30:27+00:00): Wat bedoel je precies met man_made=yes ( "Aangelegd") op dat noordelijke knooppunt?
kathleen rosseneu (2018-01-18 15:37:45+00:00): Voetpad voor voetgangers naar school.
viloan (2017-12-28 21:08:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2017-12-28 21:09:12+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Myazyk (2018-01-17 20:00:14+00:00): Арт-об'єкт "Я люблю Східницю" вже є нанесено на карту. Ви дублюєте, щей позначаєте у неправильній локації
Myazyk (2018-01-17 20:02:03+00:00): Малоймовірно, що будматеріали знаходяться у місці, де Ви їх позначили. Але я не маю змоги провірити
Asphalt forever 2018-2025 (2018-01-31 20:51:42+00:00): Так, насправді в цьому місці існує магазин будівельних матеріалів, як будете мати змогу можете перевірити.
А на рахунок арт об‘єкту, прошу вибачення, оскільки у мене на карті не відобразилось і я вирішив додати.
Дякую за розуміння!
Chris Fleming (2017-12-28 22:59:25+00:00): Hi thanks, for the edits, I've had a quick look over some of your edits where you've requested a review and they generally look great. 

Hopever on this changeset and some of the others where you have added what look like footpaths, but there haven't been tagged as such. Therefore I would suggest adding highway=footway to these?

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Cheers
Chris
Keith William (2017-12-29 05:20:46+00:00): Dear Chris,
Yes, I have indeed forgotten to tag my changes. I seems to have missed quite a lot of them, since I am still quite new to OSM. Let me fix them now.
Cheers,
Flora
Chris Fleming (2017-12-29 21:36:00+00:00): No problem Flora, great to have another mapper in Aberdeen.
marcioaguiar (2018-01-02 14:24:19+00:00): Olá, Jamerson. Porque você está alterando essas ruas para tertiary?
Jamerson Tiago (2018-01-02 14:56:02+00:00): São vias terciárias que recebem grande fluxo,além de ser corredor de transporte público, conforme disponivel nas platafromas da Smtt AL.
4004 (2018-01-01 19:29:38+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты
то, что вы добавили столько точек это хорошо, но без указания этажа (level=*) некоторые не очень полезны
ndm (2017-12-29 00:59:22+00:00): I think it's better to leave the name until signage is removed from the shop - as it's still a useful navigable piece of information.

Can't remember if they've taken down the signs on this one.
bvrdg (2018-01-05 19:57:17+00:00): Thanks. Agreed. (Sign is still up)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-12-30 13:47:17+00:00): Não deve traçar vias umas sobre as outras como fez aqui, deve iniciar uma nova via quando necessitar. Eu apaguei o traçado, por favor, trace corretamente. Link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3761694958
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-28 21:55:51+00:00): railway=construction to linia kolejowa w budowie

Jeśli nie wjechał tam sprzęt to nie jest ona w budowie ("Podpisanie umowy na realizację" to nadal railway=proposed)
Perimex (2017-12-28 22:27:15+00:00): Drogi panie, umowa została podpisana i realizacja nastąpi od momentu uzyskanie niezbędnych decyzji, jednakowóż orientacyjnie trasa została ustalona i jej wkartowanie było już od conajmniej dwóch lat. natomiast fakt podpisania umowy ten temat uwiarygodnia i prawnie staje się to w finkcji realizacyjnej. Pozdrawiam
srflp (2017-12-30 19:18:14+00:00): Fragment z wiki z artykułu "Key:construction": "for projects being planned, where there is little or no evidence for them on the ground, use proposed=* instead".
Z tego co rozumiem z wypowiedzi Mateusza na ziemi nie ma śladu budowy, stąd na ten moment prawidłowy tag dla tej linii to railway=proposed.
literan (2017-12-30 11:17:51+00:00): Здравствуйте! подскажите, это была корректная правка Molnike - http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=55015438 ? Я отрисовывал по последнему проекту, который вот здесь http://forum.nashtransport.ru/index.php?showtopic=38017 лежал
Alexey Lukin (2017-12-30 15:48:32+00:00): Здравствуйте! На южном вестибюле, судя по спутнику, действительно построили примерно как у Molnike. А на северном - не знаю пока. Актуальной схемы я не видел.
Digne (2017-12-30 19:51:31+00:00): Deze stond nog open voor een review: Ziet er goed uit.
Digne (2017-12-30 19:51:39+00:00): Deze stond nog open voor een review: Ziet er goed uit.
viloan (2017-12-28 22:13:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
5m4u9 (2017-12-29 07:13:25+00:00): hola, tengo una duda sobre este cambio, en concreto sobre la estatua...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5306857099
//
¿cómo distingues que una estatua es un memorial (monumento conmemorativo)?
//
segun yo, una estatua es una estatua pero puede o no ser memorial... estatua (tourism=artwork) y añadiendo (opcional) memorial (historic=memorial)... qué dices?
//
creo que deben tener un criterio, pero no hallé ningun documento que explique...
Caleidoscopic (2018-01-07 14:11:19+00:00): No veo el Monumento, pero por el área supongo que es Vicenta Juaristi Equino, puse Memorial porque es un personaje histórico y su estatua conmemora sus acciones, antes estuve poniendo artwork,pero es màs amplio y un memorial ya se supone que es una obra de arte,otro criterio fue que memorial ya tiene los tags busto,estatua,etc que corresponde a este tipo de elemetos. Artwork lo mantendré en elementos como estatuas de las artes o las esdtaciones,esculturas que no corresponden a personajes históricos en hechos concretos. en la wiki estaba más amplio, lo busco.
Caleidoscopic (2018-01-07 14:12:43+00:00): lo podemos ir desarrollando en una wikilocal :D gracias por escribir.
5m4u9 (2018-01-07 17:36:20+00:00): la estatua lo puse como enlace. entonces 'un memorial' no estaría en función del objeto sino del a quien se lo hizo.
//
por eso tenía duda, yo pienso (aunque sin fundamento) el objeto construido define un memorial. tampoco encontré alguna descripción local de catalogación.
//
por cierto, entonces ¿vos añadirías memorial si en la placa principal dice... en homenaje...?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-09 09:55:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549631804 - is it an attempt to map a parking?
kayle (2018-01-19 09:42:36+00:00): Probably yes. Based on changeset name and way name .
On Mapillary picture (nearly year old) https://www.mapillary.com/app?focus=photo&pKey=_JkD6t73TVE-TCMu0ES9IQ looks like ordinary forest road.
kayle (2018-01-19 09:48:28+00:00): JMS OZKH: Mám pár upresňujúcich otázok. 
Je to parkovisko nejako označené? Alebo aspoň nejako spevnené? 
Je to zmenené oproti tejto fotke? https://www.mapillary.com/app?focus=photo&pKey=_JkD6t73TVE-TCMu0ES9IQ
.
A ešte doplním, že je treba pri úpravách si vybrať správny typ. Nestačí to pomenovať parkovisko, ale treba v ponuke editora nájsť parkovisko a vybrať to. Inak to je iba neznáma čiara.
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:15:48+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
eggie (2017-12-29 07:00:49+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-12-29 07:21:21+00:00): Je hebt op grote schaal de 3dshapes landuse gewist en vervangen door Leisure park
Ik heb je edits teruggedraaid. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54995883
eggie (2017-12-29 07:42:26+00:00): Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
eggie (2017-12-29 07:49:27+00:00): Inmiddels ligt er een losse cover Leisure=park over het gebied heen.
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:15:50+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Constable (2018-01-18 07:29:00+00:00): Hi Andre, do you speak english?
*Martin* (2017-12-29 13:33:14+00:00): Ahoj Risk0,

Prisim nespajaj chodniky a cesty s plochami (napr parkom). Chodnik si tu mohol radsej prepojit na cestu.

Dakujem.
risk0 (2017-12-29 14:05:16+00:00): ahoj Martin,
vdaka za info.
Ak tam je obytna ulica (myslim tu cestu) tak tam chodniky nepridavat? Lebo co som pozeral, tak v Sabinove chybaju skoro vsetky chodniky.
*Martin* (2017-12-29 17:16:09+00:00): Ahoj,,

Ak tam chodnik je, tak ho smelo mozes zmapovat podla http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Chodn%C3%ADky :-)
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:15:52+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Sanniu (2018-01-07 08:57:08+00:00): Hi
It seems that you've added many roads that look like roundabouts, but tagged them as oneway=yes only, is it oversight or they are really not a roundabouts?
Johnwhelan (2018-01-22 20:29:54+00:00): You appear to have imported highways over existing highways.

It appears to be a mess.

Any comments?

Thanks John
edvac (2018-01-22 22:14:20+00:00): Hi, GSDA1:

I am not sure that you have imported this set of 328 roads. Maybe you have edited them with a GIS software like ArcGIS or QGIS, and then decided to add them to OpenStreetMap.
But even in this case, you have done a mess in the area, because you have added them where many of the roads were already mapped.
I guess the best option is to revert the changes to solve the mess, and then you could, with help of others maybe, add and integrate all the roads/segments that weren't present in OSM before you added them.
In case it is an import (a dataset not created by you), you can't do that, except following the import guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
GSDA1 (2018-01-23 11:33:42+00:00): Goodday all. Thank you for your comments and observations. I didn't take care to notice that the area had been previously mapped before uploading them. However, i will take adequate and urgent steps to clean the data i uploaded especially those areas that have duplicates. I wished i knew how to undo the changes in bulk so i can only import the data that isn't there. The project was done last year and supervised by myself for the community in concern.
edvac (2018-01-23 11:54:46+00:00): Hi, GSDA1:

First, I hope all people involved are ok with you adding these data to OSM... Otherwise, it would be technically an import, and we do need the permission of the data creators before adding the data to OSM.

Please, bear in mind for the next time that, in OSM, there are usually data already there, so you need to manually conflate new data instead of just uploading it.

Also, the segments you have added contain several tags that shouldn't be there, like:

OBJECTID
SHAPE_Leng
STATUS
TYPE

You need to delete them all or, if they have some interesting info, translate them to existing OSM tags. For example, some roads have a tag NAME, that would translate into name, and the value of name should be in non-capital letters too, like name=1st Utagban Road

Finally, and very important, you should keep all segments that were there before you uploaded, so we keep the oldest ones, and delete your duplicates.

Cheers!