piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RedAuburn (2024-07-30 01:54:53+00:00): is this really a recycling centre as described in the wiki: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:recycling_type=centre? Or is it a second-hand shop type thing?
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-29 16:06:01+00:00): Hi Fabbari, welcome to OSM.

It's a good practice to edit only local areas and not all over the world like this edit.
This update will be seen by many people all over the world!

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
tastrax (2021-01-09 00:11:46+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Super Good (2021-01-11 13:19:52+00:00): :)
Frans S (2021-01-02 15:31:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About your mappings, Your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared.
Please map each building individually and do not collect a number of buildings mapped as 1 building.
On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
VA00 (2021-02-02 13:59:24+00:00): Zepsułeś skorygowany przebieg szlaku, który ktoś mozolnie sprawdził w terenie. Źródło jest nieaktualne, a żadnej drogi w poprzek nowej obwodnicy nie ma.
VA00 (2021-02-02 14:18:57+00:00): Proszę przed edycją sprawdzać historię obiektów: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2405767/history

I najpierw kontaktować się z autorami wcześniejszych zmian, jeżeli są wątpliwości. Niszczenie czyjejś pracy bez informowania autora jest źle widziane.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-02 15:19:48+00:00): Na jakiej licencji są dane z https://malopolska.szlaki.pttk.pl/284-pttk-malopolska-babice-bukowica ?

Czy zrobiłeś więcej takich edycji?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-02 15:30:01+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=817669#p817669

Ta edycja została wycofana na zamówienie VA00 jako wycofanie zmian niszczących dane ltóre było zrobione na podstawie niemal na pewno danych o wadliwej licencji w ramach nieprzedyskutowanego importu 

Zobacz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
PT-53 (2020-12-30 07:49:54+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889605184/history
überschneidet auf einem kurzen Stück diesen Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239549411/history
Außerdem liegen diese beiden Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8270509364/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8270509365/history
übereinander.

Wie ich sehe hat ID dazu 3 Warnungen "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway" angezeigt, die Du aber leider ignoriert hast.
Schade.
PT-53 (2020-12-30 07:50:53+00:00): Gefunden mit OSMI:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.61776&lat=47.89794&zoom=18&opacity=0.34
PT-53 (2021-01-17 09:32:35+00:00): Erledigt durch  FvGordon ·
retepaskab (2020-12-29 16:16:24+00:00): Az oszlop odébbhúzása lehet elhamarkodott volt, rosszul emlékeztem a helyére.
Marcello Perathoner (2020-12-30 00:36:56+00:00): Hoi Albert, preibel nia mettr plu pistes una seura l'autra, y for mettr me una pista pro route. Ciela coche ie ei fat. Saluc
Albert Murer (2020-12-30 00:55:30+00:00): Dar bel giulan. Iö apa empormò metü man sön OSM. Pur vigni fal che i fej aldi dar gion ne cunsai. Pur les pistes uroi ciamò zignè cares de Armentarola ti proscimi dis. Spo speri ti daras na controlada. Servus
johantiden (2020-12-31 08:31:57+00:00): Det här ser fel ut. Har du råkar flytta iväg den här noden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1364170555/history#map=19/59.34795/18.15803
HansWesterback (2020-12-31 13:36:33+00:00): Skumt, jag la till namnet Östervägen som saknades, förstår inte hur den där punkten kom in...? Men jag är ju nybörjare... Kan man backa detta changeset och göra om, göra rätt?
johantiden (2020-12-31 13:59:02+00:00): Jag tänker att du kanske råkade dra i punkten istället för att panorera eller nåt. Ingen panik! 

Det finns inget "rent" sätt att backa. Det är lättast att flytta tillbaka punkten manuellt dit det kom ifrån. Jag kan göra det om du vill, eller vill du se det som en träningsexercis?

Nodens position "innan" står i hustoriken på noden. Se länken ovan. Man kan (tror jag) öppna ID och manuellt ändra positionen. Skriv in det gamla värdet och kolla att det verkar rimligt. Den borde ligga bredvid vägen tänker jag.
HansWesterback (2021-01-01 09:23:45+00:00): Ok, jag flyttade tillbaks den dit där den borde ha varit, ser väl OK ut nu?
johantiden (2021-01-01 09:28:08+00:00): Vägarna ser bra ut men nu har du råkar dra med dig skogen som sitter fast i noden. Man kan koppla isär dem så at de får varsin nod. Ta bort noden från skogen så tror jag det är som innan. 

Se https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23978967#map=15/59.3469/18.1619
HansWesterback (2021-01-01 09:55:06+00:00): Jag ser inte hur jag kan koppla isär dom, eller rättare jag ser inte dom hänger ihop? Om jag markerar punkten i editläge (redigera med ID), så ser jag ju skogen som hänger i där på kartan, men ser inget i Objektets properties till vänster som kan ändras?
johantiden (2021-01-01 14:44:24+00:00): Jag tror det finns knappar uppe i mitten på ID. Där lär det finnas något i stil med "disjoin" eller "separate", vilken klipper isär alla vägar i punkten och därmed skapar nya punkter.

När det väl finns en egen punkt för skogen kan du flytta den till rätt position. Sen kan det bli så att cyjelvägen och gångväcen ochså får varsina punkter så då måste de slås ihop igen. Ojoj det blir mer och mer komplicerat alltihop :)
HansWesterback (2021-01-01 15:44:43+00:00): Hittade inget sånt, i stället deletade jag punkten helt, då försvann ju skogskopplingen, sen lade jag till den igen och den gångväg som samtidigt försvann.... tror det ser OK ut nu?
johantiden (2021-01-01 17:46:50+00:00): Jag tycker det ser bra ut! Bra jobbat!

Det finns massa verktyg om man högerklickar på en nod eller väg. Där kanske man hade kunnat göra det som jag tänkte.
Frans S (2020-12-30 15:31:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please square the buildings you map,
See this info how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
syntex (2021-05-26 10:45:57+00:00): Dodałeś apartments do garażu
starsep (2021-05-26 11:11:37+00:00): Dzięki za poprawę! To były moje początki z OSM i musiałem nieuważnie uznać, że pytanie dotyczy pobliskiego budynku
Frans S (2020-12-31 10:22:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Your mappings are rather accurate but lacks the finishing touch, squaring of the buildings. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other features or buildings
Please read this document with tips about mapping
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Mannivu (2021-01-07 18:03:29+00:00): If the pharmacy does not exists, the POI should not be added; the "abandoned" prefix should be used if the name of the pharmacy it's still visible, but if the place is empty and up for sale/rent there should be no POI
zorglubu (2020-12-29 17:49:14+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre contribution. Les informations concernant le camping sont déjà portées par l'aire camping. Pour les voir et les modifier, vous pouvez cliquer sur le contour de l'emprise au sol. Je vous invite ensuite à supprimer le point que vous avez ajouté et qui fait doublon.
Bien cordialement, et bonnes fêtes !
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-30 08:12:55+00:00): Hi contributor14, welcome to OSM.

It's a good practice to edit only local areas and not all over the world like this edit.
This update will be seen by many people all over the world!

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
kylor (2020-12-30 22:19:47+00:00): Only edit one area at a time, if you want to move somewhere else, save.
Frans S (2021-01-02 15:18:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About your mappings, Your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared.
Please map each building individually and do not collect a number of buildings mapped as 1 building.
On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-01-02 15:46:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About your mappings, Your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared.
Where trees hides parts of a building, Please extrapolate the roof line.
On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
MK 1 (2021-02-14 19:09:05+00:00): Why is deleted R-road?
Frans S (2020-12-30 11:35:59+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark . please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings or features and square all rectangular buildings.
This document might be of help to improve mapping quality
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-01-04 09:16:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here 
A few remarks about your mappings. Your mappings are rather precise but not always squared. Also extrapolate the rooflines of a building where trees hides the roof and do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping
This document might be of help.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-01-04 09:17:20+00:00): Forgot to mention.  Please map buildings individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building
Best regards
user_2066394 (2020-12-29 21:34:39+00:00): Bei der Bearbeitung hast du building=yes entfernt, damit verschwindet das Gebäude.
Frans S (2020-12-31 11:26:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
About your mappings. Sorry to say, but most of them are rather inaccurate and not squared. Please keep in mind that most buildings have a rectangular pattern and needs to be squared.
Please read attached document about how to improve mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
muchichka_s (2020-12-29 20:39:40+00:00): Hi, Evan. Thank you for correcting many warnings. I have only one small question for you.
Why do you change maxspeed:type->source:maxspeed?
It doesn't really matter to me how to mark it and I can mark this in any of 2 methods. Just because I add a lot of them, I want to make sure I'm making a mistake or not. Or maybe there are advantages to some method?
Cristoffs (2020-12-29 18:49:18+00:00): Możesz wyjaśnić co zrobiłeś?
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-30 10:42:34+00:00): Proszę, wyjaśnij co i po co zrobiono w tej edycji, przed jakimikolwiek innymi zmianami.
Kosu77 (2021-01-03 15:10:00+00:00): Import który w pierwszej chwili okazał się błędny okazał się jednak prawidłowy i sprowadzał się do małych poprawek typu "Wartość "addr:street" nie pasuje do ulic w pobliżu" (brak ulic w miejscowościach w których dopiero zostały wprowadzone lub błędy typu "H. Sienkiewicza - Henryka Sienkiewicza") i postanowiłem go przywrócić.
Wspomniane błędy już kończyłem poprawiać ale zostałem zablokowany niestety.
Cristoffs (2021-01-03 17:01:07+00:00): Blokada została na Ciebie nałożona z kilku powodów. Po pierwsze tego typu importy podlegają specjalnym zasadą, których nie przestrzegałeś. Po drugie nie było z Toba kontaktu. Problem z adresami w OSM jest spory i staramy się z tym walczyć, ale wymaga to rozwagi. Tego typu importy mogą zniszczyć pracę innych. Dostrzegam twoje zaangażowanie i chęć doskonalenia mapy, ale w ten sposób tego się po prostu nierobi. Zapraszam na forum lub na Discorda. Porozmawiajmy. Mamy narzędzia do importu adresów w sposób powiedzmy mniej agresywny.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-03 17:57:01+00:00): Importy adresów są jak najbardziej przydatne, więcej osób do ich robienia się przyda.

Ważne jednak by 

(0) komunikować się, zwłaszcza przed i w trakcie masowego importu

(1) Zobacz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

(2) nie robić ich w sposób typu "zaimportowano 100 000 adresów, skasowano 50 000 adresów, odtworzono 25 000 adresów, skasowano 10 000 innych adresów". Powoduje to wiele problemów. Nie wiadomo co się dzieje - czy ktoś np. kasuje adresy które dodał czy poprawne czy oba? Wywraca ta różnego rodzaju narzędzia (np. to do importu adresów i budynków dalej chyba leży po tym i po podobnym imporcie budynków)

(3) jeśli ktoś importuje musi też posprzątać ewentualne błędy importu (są szanse że inni pomogą) - wynika to z tego że mało kto jest zainteresowany takim sprzątaniem a łatwiej jest zrobić porządny import niż sprzątać po wadliwym

Zapraszamy na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 (logowanie kontem OSM) czy Discord (link na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Discord_servers ).

Zobacz jak to wygląda z zewnątrz - nagle ppjawiają się edycje kasujące/tworzące tysiące adresów z opisam zmian "test".

Ale na koniec: pomoc w importowaniu oficjalnych danych się przyda! W Polsce jest wiele materiałów które możemy wykorzystać a tego jeszcze w pełni nie robimy.
woodpeck_repair (2021-03-31 06:46:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 102020319, 102013660, 102017051, 102013098, 102011378, 102025540, 102016336, 102012763, 102015297, 102022908, 102027001, 102011893, 102014416, 102018345, 102009137, 102015795, 102012305, 102030139, 102028531, 102024191, 102013937, 102019227, 102017661, 102014727, 102021580, 102013409, 102014180 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed Kosu77 imports
71XRZ (2024-08-09 00:20:15+00:00): Versions #1 of the nodes by CanvecImports had "Municipal Road" , not "Regional Road". What is the rationale for this change?

The name tags of the ways did have "Regional" at import from Geobase, but the addr:street tags of the nodes had "Municipal" at import from CanVec by CanvecImports over 10 years ago. In the case of the nodes at the ends of the interpolation ways, this is not a revert.
salve100 (2020-12-29 18:06:35+00:00): Uso de los tags en consideracion a el satelite que usa Google Maps (actualizado hace unas semanas), que data de Octubre - Diciembre 2020
Warin61 (2023-02-15 01:38:36+00:00): Hi,

Are you certain that this Rural Fire Brigade occupies both buildings?
Wipflord (2020-12-31 12:47:26+00:00): Der Autor der Änderung wurde angeschrieben, mit Bitte um Wiederherstellung, da der Polizeiposten sehr wohl existiert.
danieldegroot2 (2024-08-22 14:40:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7110676739
Is the survey point demolished?
If so, please indicate it as such.
b-unicycling (2024-08-23 07:43:25+00:00): No, it was still there, when I visited last. I think what I meant was that there is no plaque with the date on site, but that the farmer told us the date. It's been a while, though, so I'm not 100% sure that's what I meant.
Frans S (2021-01-02 15:36:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About your mappings, Your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared.
You tend to map buildings oversized.
Please map each building individually and do not collect a number of buildings mapped as 1 building.
Also solve the issues on the issue triangle of IDeditor.
On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-15 23:59:21+00:00): Is this also based on guessing or have you actually checked what you mapped?
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-30 08:13:43+00:00): Hi paulc2018, welcome to OSM.

It's a good practice to edit only local areas and not all over the world like this edit.

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-30 08:18:40+00:00): Hi DJT1571, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped paths? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=96620927#14/45.4410/-74.2786

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
DJT1571 (2020-12-30 22:01:26+00:00): Hi,
I deleted the paths because they pass on private property. Since there are many signs on the property that explicitly tell people not to follow these paths, it is obvious that the landowners do not tolerate trespassers. The pathways also all come from the main "sentier de l'escapade", which is maintained by the town of Rigaud, and the paths I deleted are not part of it; there are signs on the town's trails that forbid trespassing on any paths not part of the main trail.

Have a nice new year's eve!
Frans S (2020-12-30 09:59:28+00:00): Hello.  We welcome you as a new mapper.
A remark about your mappings. 
Please map more accurate alongside the rooflines. Sometimes you included to much green in a building . Look also to shadows. and do not include the shadow in a mapping. Always square rectangular buildings with the Q key.
Please read also this document about improving mapping quality
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
woodpeck (2021-06-07 18:21:27+00:00): Dear harahu, in this changeset you created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889782930 which leads down westwards from Burkelandsfjellet. Are you local to the area - can you confirm that this path is legal to use and does not cross private property?
harahu (2021-06-08 00:00:55+00:00): woodpeck, for uncultivated land specifically, right to roam is given by law in Norway: https://lovdata.no/lov/1957-06-28-16/§2

Hence, whether or not this is private property isn't a concern, as long as you show appropriate care and respect for said property.
woodpeck (2021-06-08 23:31:36+00:00): The reason I wrote is that DWG has received a complaint from a land owner that says: "In Norwegian Friluftslov people are not allowed through farms and private roads. These paths are not marked and not in official maps". I am not familiar with local laws. Will it be sufficient to send them the link you quoted above? I can't see any "farms" on the aerial image here but I don't know what they mean with "private roads" - one would probably not be able to discern a "private road" from a public one on aerial imagery. Hence my question.
woodpeck (2021-06-08 23:33:09+00:00): (It is currently unclear to me exactly which of the paths leading down from Burkelandsfjellet they have a problem with.)
harahu (2021-06-09 14:32:32+00:00): CONTINUED:

My reading of the complaint is that they take issue with some section of path, or road, that crosses "innmark" (cultivated land), as I can see no conceivable argument as to why access should be restricted on the parts of these trails that cross uncultivated land. Hence, I assume the path you point out in your initial comment is not the path segment the complainant has issue with.

It would be beneficial if the complainant could specify the exact path segments that would fall under one of the three reasons listed above for possibly limiting access, as well as their reasoning in accordance with the law. Only then would it be practical to evaluate whether their complaint has merit.
harahu (2021-06-09 15:08:02+00:00): I found an English translation of the 
Outdoor Recreation Act (or Friluftslov) that both me and the complaint is referring to. The translation is not considered official, but is written by the government, and more or less conveys the information content of the Norwegian law: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/outdoor-recreation-act/id172932/ 

I hope it can help is clearing up questions you might have. Of most relevance are §2, §3, and §4.
Gazer75 (2021-06-14 21:11:23+00:00): This area where the path is is considered uncultivated land and the freedom to roam applies. There is no law forbidding people to walk this path. Even if its not marked it can be naturally created by people walking the same path over and over. This is what highway=path is used for in Norway, naturally created trails/paths.
joost schouppe (2023-06-19 07:58:05+00:00): Hi Artvin, you drew a small new neighborhood here, but there is nothing there. Is this some planned infrastructure you happen to know about?
bxl-forever (2020-12-30 23:09:21+00:00): Hello,
Why did you delete wikidata and wikipedia tags from the database?
They looked perfectly fine.
A new community decision?
Roadsguy (2021-01-05 03:41:04+00:00): It's not a motorway just because it goes on a bridge. It's a motorway because it has direct connections to motorways, especially the Willis Avenue Bridge, which connects on both ends. You can go from Harlem River Drive over the bridge to northbound I-87 without leaving a controlled-access, grade-separated road restricted to motor vehicles.
clay_c (2021-01-05 15:36:09+00:00): To be fair, the Willis Avenue Bridge is movable, which precludes motorway classification IMO.

How often do the bridges over the Harlem River get raised? Is there a somewhat consistent schedule, or is it more of a once-in-a-blue-moon thing?
Roadsguy (2021-01-05 16:13:14+00:00): Well movable bridges on even Interstate highways aren't unprecedented, even on relatively new bridges like the Woodrow Wilson Bridge on the Capital Beltway. Even I-278 nearby crosses the Bronx River on a drawbridge. At that point it's less "there's a gap in the freeway here" and more "substandard freeways occasionally have movable bridges on them."

At minimum the bridges should be mapped as trunk roads.
Fluffy89502 (2021-01-05 21:58:19+00:00): Just because a road has to ramps to two different motorway doesn't make it a motorway right? This seems to just be Willis Avenue on a bridge that has two connections in a short span. 125th street spans the distance between two different motorways and has nearby connections to them but thats also just a regular road right?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-15 23:59:16+00:00): Is this also based on guessing or have you actually checked what you mapped?
felipeeugenio (2023-07-22 13:41:15+00:00): Hola Maxspeed=10?
No se ve muy verídico. por favor cuidado con las ediciones
ToniE (2020-12-30 14:46:05+00:00): Hello,

Maybe a small mistake? I don't think, that

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548892107

is really a oneway road.

Found with this tool:

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/FR/IDF/FR-IDF-transports-daniel-meyer-Analysis.html#bus_DM10A

Cordiallement
Toni
Kalaallit Nunaat (2020-12-30 16:43:29+00:00): Hello Toni,
Exact cela a échappé à ma vigilance.
Il y avait un gros bazar sur ce carrefour!
Cordialement
aquarix (2021-04-18 20:12:04+00:00): Hallo tintinmaster,
du hast das Impfzentrum Neuwied korrigiert.
Nun ist es so, dass nachträglich noch ein zweiter Punkt als Impfzentrum eingetragen wurde. Da wahrscheinlich nicht zwei Orte dafür existieren, wird einer falsch sein. 
Bitte mal in der Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2601675 äußern und wenn möglich korrigieren.
Gruß aquarix
Meijinaerum (2020-12-30 08:31:40+00:00): Добрий день.
1. Тег "construction=secondary" треба усунути - по закінченню будівництва більше не потрібний.
2. Всі ваші зміни мають назву "Поправки". Добре було б коротко описати які зміни зробили в цьому пакеті правок. Наприклад, "Відкрито міст у Маршинцях".