piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-08-22 00:21:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-08-22 00:39:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GOwin (2019-08-28 04:01:25+00:00): Why remove the noexit=yes tag? What do you mean by motor_vehicle=no, on a node along a highway?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73601389
gormo (2019-10-08 08:14:14+00:00): Hallo, woher hast du den Namen Lichtenberghöhle?
Rassilon (2019-08-22 02:12:41+00:00): Oops I meant Burlingame Hills
maraf24 (2019-09-01 20:30:47+00:00): Też byłem i widziałem, dlatego dałem tracka.
To jest droga szeroka na samochód.
Po co się upierasz przy głupich definicjach tracka?
Wycofałem. Kolejny raz.
maraf24 (2019-09-01 20:36:21+00:00): Nb. to jest też przykład:
1. poprawy krótko po mojej edycji bez jakiekolwiek wcześniejszego kontaktu ze mną.
2. użycia lakonicznego opisu, nic nie mówiącego 
3. nie podania źródła
Sam zobacz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73198956

To jest motyw przewodni twoich edycji - nie wiadomo dokładnie co, jak i dlaczego.
Nie wiadomo czy byłeś czy nie.
maro21 (2019-09-02 02:34:44+00:00): Tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273361379 jest droga szeroka na co najmniej trzy samochody. Dlaczego to nie track?

Takich opisów używam wtedy gdy to co poprawiam jest oczywiste. Tu dla każdego będzie oczywiste, że nie jest to droga polna ani leśna, nie trzeba tam nawet być, wystarczy rzut okiem na mapę i to nie na zdjęcia lotnicze. Widać, że ścieżka pieszo-rowerowa przechodzi w drogę polną, a potem znowu w ścieżkę pieszo-rowerową. Kompletnie nie rozumiem dlaczego się uparłeś że chodnik ma być drogą leśną.
Retired Account (2019-11-04 13:31:34+00:00): Hi,
Why is there a need to introduce multi-polygon for a simple area (Old Police Academy) without any inner polygons?
Retired Account (2019-11-04 13:32:53+00:00): Hi,
Why is there a need to introduce multi-polygon for a simple area (City Square Residences) without any inner polygons?
maraf24 (2019-09-01 19:57:35+00:00): Wycofałem. Powód: celowe usuwanie istotnych danych z osm, czyli wandalizm.
maro21 (2019-09-02 02:29:25+00:00): Próbowałem od ciebie wyciągnąć co jest istotną daną którą usuwam, a ty ponownie cofasz bez żadnego uzasadnienia. Ja swoją edycję wyjaśniłem w komentarzu do zestawu zmian.
user_5359 (2019-08-22 05:33:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.
maraf24 (2019-09-01 20:42:45+00:00): Wandalizm wycofałem.
chachafish (2019-08-29 13:46:07+00:00): Hello, are you certain about these changes here? You've changed a fire station into a petting zoo and a carousel? The name for the carousel seems to be very suspicious. In your changeset comments you say this is from a ground survey. Is that correct? Thank you.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-12-20 16:31:06+00:00): Hi, could you please just not simply merge a "split" roundabout in this city please? I have mapped a public bus route, so roundabouts have to be split to indicate route.

Take a look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5473483
AkuAnakTimur (2019-12-20 16:32:29+00:00): Some roundabouts are mapped as a relation instead, because of this particular reason.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-12-25 12:27:32+00:00): Fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78845908
bhav_ana (2019-12-30 02:59:20+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Thanks for the suggestion. Will follow the notes mentioned.

Thanks,
bhav_ana
maraf24 (2019-09-16 21:15:51+00:00): The wiki is not valid source for mass retagging.
And wiki is wrong in that case.
thetornado76 (2019-09-17 06:39:37+00:00): In all languages ​​of the wiki, however, dance: teaching is recommended.
maraf24 (2019-09-18 22:22:55+00:00): I can't find these recommendations. Could you please point to them?
thetornado76 (2019-09-20 15:15:13+00:00): It is not recommended directly, but 
 amenity=dancing_school has been abandoned for over 4 years. There are also only 380 entries compared to 2700 dance:teaching.
maraf24 (2019-09-24 09:11:46+00:00): This tag is not abandoned, it was undiscussed change by Geozeisig.
thetornado76 (2019-09-25 03:33:23+00:00): I saw you changed it back.
dancing:teaching was confirmed in 2009. amenity=dancing_school there is only one proposal which was abandoned in 2012 and never approved, like dancing:teaching. 
If you think this is wrong, please discuss it there.
user_5359 (2019-08-22 05:20:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use for addr:state values the two uppercase character abbrevation of the states.
mariotomo (2020-02-15 18:31:11+00:00): hola.  a propósito de Santa María de Nieva, y su papel de admin_centre para la relación administrativa de nivel 8 (pero muy grande), qué opina la comunidad peruana de promover en centro administrativo a 'town'?  tienen unos acuerdos generales a propósito?
ovruni (2020-02-17 06:52:05+00:00): Hola mariotomo

La ley de creación de la provincia reconoce a Santa María de Nieva con la categoría de villa http://www.leyes.congreso.gob.pe/Documentos/Leyes/23832.pdf

Por otra parte, viendo el resultado del último censo https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1541/tomo1.pdf (página 47), la población censada en Santa María de Nieva es de menos de 3000 habitantes. (JOSM recomienda etiquetar como villa a lugares con menos de 10000 habitantes)

Saludos
Omar
mariotomo (2020-02-17 15:47:16+00:00): Hola Omar.  pasé por Santa María de Nieva en julio del 2015.  estoy participando al mapeo de Panamá, y aquí tenemos muchas comunidades que se apoyan a un centro que queda pequeño, si no cuentas las comunidades que se le apoyan.  las "reglas" o recomendaciones de OSM son demasiado eurocéntricas, hay que interpretar su sentido, y adaptarlas a las condiciones locales. en una zona con poca población, y muy uniformemente distribuida, un centro con 3000 habitantes quizás vale la pena preguntarse si hay que subirle la categoría.  sobre todo si tiene terminal de transporte, si tiene función de 'hub', si tiene escuelas, hospital de alguna relevancia…  en fin, sabrán ustedes en el Perú.  cordialidades, Mario.
DD1GJ (2019-08-22 06:16:56+00:00): Die Straßen waren eigentlich richtig erfasst, Die Beschilderung ist vermutlich ein "Anlieger frei" für Fahrzeuge aller Art. Da es sich um eine Sackgasse handelt, wurde eventuell auf ein "Fahrrad frei" verzichtet.

Das wäre dann ein vehicle:destination oder motor_vehicle=destination, aber auch das vorherige access=destination war mit Ausnahme Fußgänger fast korrekt.

Ein Navi sollte eigentlich erkennen können, dass dass bei einer Zieladresse im Tulpenweg dieser auch befahren werden darf. Wir sollten nicht die OSM-Daten verfälschen, um Defizite in schlechten Folgeprodukten auszugleichen.
viloan (2019-08-22 04:29:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-08-22 05:31:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Supaplex (2020-01-02 14:09:00+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
aquarix (2019-11-03 13:41:01+00:00): Hello Thắng Lưu,
welcome to OSM.
You added a baby hatch on the equator at see. Please move it to the correct place as here is no hospital.
Regards aquarix
GOwin (2019-08-28 05:06:09+00:00): Why delete existing features for no good reason, when your edits rae minor?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73605198
GOwin (2019-08-28 05:18:51+00:00): Try to elaborate on your changeset comments. "test" is not very helpful.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73605198
seav (2019-08-28 05:57:12+00:00): @GOwin, just to clarify, I think your first comment is not intended for this changeset (because nothing was deleted here)? So the second comment is the correct feedback?
nevw (2019-08-22 10:59:17+00:00): Hi
The bar appears to be mapped on a private residence. If it is not a public bar then it would be preferred you remove it from the public osm.
Supaplex (2020-01-02 14:10:19+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Glassman (2019-08-22 18:59:43+00:00): Are you sure about the heights. OSM uses meters for heights. A 12 meter building would be close to 40' - like a 4 story building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73605996
frasty (2020-03-07 19:18:18+00:00): Ciao,
a una precedente discussione non hai risposto, spero tu lo faccia almeno questa volta, poi fai tu.
Tutti gli import di edifici che hai effettuato usano Bing imagery che è una sorgente notoriamente poco affidabile, non più aggiornata da almeno OTTO ANNI. Che senso ha usare una sorgente così per degli import così massicci? Per esempio la scuola che hai disegnato (way 717040942), insieme a tanti altri edifici non esiste più dal 2012! Per favore per la Toscana usa GEOSCOPIO Toscana ORTOFOTO!
ndm (2019-08-22 19:23:31+00:00): Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)
vennredd (2019-08-23 12:26:40+00:00): Hey Neil,
 
Thank you for looking into my edit. I have understood the problem associated with the parallax in Maxar imagery. The team has been appropriately informed about the risk you have pointed out and have been advised to use the offset imagery tool in OSM to avoid making this mistake. I have taken a note of the same and would not repeat this mistake in future. Let me know in case you have any further concerns. I am always happy to learn from the community.
 
Regards
vennredd
user_5359 (2019-08-22 16:15:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useless information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ndm (2019-08-22 19:26:33+00:00): Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)
mundlk (2019-08-23 12:37:52+00:00): Hey Neil,
 
Thank you for looking into my edit. I have understood the problem associated with the parallax in Maxar imagery. The team has been appropriately informed about the risk you have pointed out and have been advised to use the offset imagery tool in OSM to avoid making this mistake. I have taken a note of the same and would not repeat this mistake in future. Let me know in case you have any further concerns. I am always happy to learn from the community.
 
Regards
mundlk.
Reza_koulivand (2019-09-10 16:10:13+00:00): سلام بزرگراه ملایر-بروجرد رو متاسفانه خیلی بد ویرایش کردین
sovereign_ch (2019-08-22 07:51:40+00:00): Unbemerkt ungeschlossenes Changeset: Korrektur Strassen-/Gebäudegeometrie Adliswil, Wiederherstelltung riverbank-tag (CS review; Kanton Zürich (Geolion) WMS: Layer Amtliche Vermessung, Orthophoto); mobile, temporäre Veranstaltung/Kasse entfernt (CS review).
Hjart (2019-08-22 07:44:51+00:00): Could you please save only once per 10 buildings or something like that?
ndm (2019-08-22 19:28:59+00:00): Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)
neerdixi (2019-08-23 12:31:33+00:00): Hey Neil,
 
Thank you for looking into my edit. I have understood the problem associated with the parallax in Maxar imagery. The team has been appropriately informed about the risk you have pointed out and have been advised to use the offset imagery tool in OSM to avoid making this mistake. I have taken a note of the same and would not repeat this mistake in future. Let me know in case you have any further concerns. I am always happy to learn from the community.
 
Regards
neerdixi
ndm (2019-08-22 19:30:26+00:00): Dear Amazon Mapping Team,

Most of previous Bristol (UK) edits have been made based on ESRI clarity (which also matches previous Bing layer -- not current one) .

This is documented in the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bristol)

Please ensure that any mapping using, e.g. Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta), aligns imagery to existing drawn content already in OpenStreetMap.

At present, I am seeing a lot of edits from Amazon affiliated mappers trying to draw roads though buildings, or other poor mapping, due to the different/poor alignment/strange parallax of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta). Obviously, it would be better if this could be fixed "early" in the mapping process -- rather than having to revert any poor edits.

Best regards,
Neil Matthews (ndm)
sefbisht (2019-08-23 12:26:43+00:00): Hey Neil,
 
Thank you for looking into my edit. I have understood the problem associated with the parallax in Maxar imagery. The team has been appropriately informed about the risk you have pointed out and have been advised to use the offset imagery tool in OSM to avoid making this mistake. I have taken a note of the same and would not repeat this mistake in future. I have edited and fixed the alignment. Let me know in case you have any further concerns. I am always happy to learn from the community.
 
Regards
sefbisht
Frans S (2019-10-15 09:45:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square all the buildings you map in future mappings with the Q key in iDeditor.
It is a quality issue at HOTOSM to deliver quality mappings.
Best regards
iWowik (2019-10-14 12:21:13+00:00): Здраствуйте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, а также вносите адресную информацию.
Ее иногда не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы ее берете?
MikhaylovaA (2019-11-12 09:03:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Или с адресных табличек или от местных жителей
iWowik (2019-11-16 08:38:28+00:00): Мне кажется, что вы лукавите.
За один только август вы внесли 1806 адресов. Если обходить таблички и спрашивать местных жителей, то даже если тратить если не по две, то хотя бы по минуте на домик, то получается каждый день без выходных по одному часу.
iWowik (2019-11-23 15:51:54+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о моем комментарии, поэтому повторю вопрос.
Откуда вы берете информацию об адресах домиков да еще в таком количестве?
tretru1 (2019-08-22 07:49:36+00:00): ул.Благонравова тупиковая, проезда нет
Hjart (2019-08-22 09:57:22+00:00): When mapping in Denmark, please make sure that you are using our national SDFE aerial imagery, which (unlike Bing etc) is refreshed every spring.
Frans S (2019-08-22 14:09:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Urgent request.
Please use the MAXAR P imagery to map from. The Bing Imagery, which you are using now is very old and outdated. Maxar P is listed in the instructions as the imagery to be used. On attached webpage you cans read how you can select another imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer

Best regards
szydzio (2019-09-17 05:43:14+00:00): Lokalizacja obiektu nie odpowiada podanemu adresowi. Przenoszę obiekt na ulicę Prusa.
Frans S (2019-08-22 14:07:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Urgent request.
Please use the MAXAR P imagery to map from. The Bing Imagery, which you are using now is very old and outdated. Maxar P is listed in the instructions as the imagery to be used. On attached webpage you cans read how you can select another imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer

Best regards
Palolo (2019-08-22 14:26:45+00:00): Please follow the instructions on the HOT task, and take the time to accurately map the buildings.
canfe (2019-11-14 09:48:07+00:00): C'è un edificio chiamato "defribrillatore" vicino ad un punto taggato correttamente defribrillatore.
Frans S (2019-08-22 14:04:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Urgent request.
Please use the MAXAR P imagery to map from. The Bing Imagery, which you are using now is very old and outdated. Maxar P is listed in the instructions as the imagery to be used. On attached webpage you cans read how you can select another imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer

Best regards
carstenhag (2019-08-22 08:19:14+00:00): Well this change was dumb. I'm changing it back.
Frans S (2019-08-22 13:59:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Urgent request. 
Please use the MAXAR P imagery to map from. The Bing Imagery, which you are using now is very old and outdated. Maxar P is listed in the instructions as the imagery to be used. On attached webpage you cans read how you can select another imagery
Best regards
Frans S (2019-08-22 14:00:02+00:00): https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
Frans S (2019-08-22 14:10:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Urgent request.
Please use the MAXAR P imagery to map from. The Bing Imagery, which you are using now is very old and outdated. Maxar P is listed in the instructions as the imagery to be used. On attached webpage you cans read how you can select another imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer

Best regards
Frans S (2019-08-22 14:06:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Urgent request.
Please use the MAXAR P imagery to map from. The Bing Imagery, which you are using now is very old and outdated. Maxar P is listed in the instructions as the imagery to be used. On attached webpage you cans read how you can select another imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer

Best regards