piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FraukeLeo (2022-02-14 12:11:42+00:00): Hallo berndw, du hast an dieser Kreuzung https://osm.org/go/0GIh3BFR2?m= den einzigen zur L 255 hinführenden oneway gelöscht und den Rest geradegezogen. So kann die Kreuzung nicht funktionieren :) ich habs mal repariert.
berndw (2022-02-14 17:33:42+00:00): Danke, da waren mehrere Wege übereinander gepappt, da bin ich wohl etwas durcheinander gekommen.
b-holdet (2022-02-17 13:03:19+00:00): Hej,

Jeg ved godt at du ikke vil svarer på disse ting, men kunne du ikke give et svar på, hvorfor du har skiftet navnet til Borum Stormose.

Det stod allerede i 
alt_name=Borum Stormose

Kig i SDFE stednavne for Søer og se hvad navnet skal være
osmviborg (2022-02-17 15:12:44+00:00): https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/stednavne2/1233766a-2c96-6b98-e053-d480220a5a3f/Stormose
hatul (2022-02-13 19:47:43+00:00): תודה על העריכה אבל שברת את שביל ישראל כי סימנת אותו בטעות על כל מעגל התנועה. כדאי לשים לב בפעם הבאה.
Sanniu (2022-02-14 07:21:33+00:00): And why is this broke the relation? Can you explain?
hatul (2022-02-14 08:39:01+00:00): השביל צריך להיות קו אחד רציף. אם אתה מסמן מעגל תנועה בתור יחס אז לא ניתן להוריד את השביל (למשל בתור GPX).
hatul (2022-02-14 08:39:25+00:00): צריך לחתוך את מעגל התנועה ולסמן רק את החלק שבו השביל עובר.
Matt McCutchen (2022-02-13 14:32:56+00:00): My main goal in this changeset is to stop tourists unaffiliated with Madison Fields (like me) from assuming they can use the road as a through route.  The entrance from Mouth of Monocacy Road is signed "private drive", so definitely "access=private".  The signage at the entrance from Big Woods Road doesn't explicitly state access.  "access=destination" or "access=customers" might be more accurate on that side (we'd have to figure out the division point with "access=private"), but I didn't want to take the risk of entering to seek more information.  Feel free to change the access tag if you known better.
aceman444 (2022-02-13 14:39:44+00:00): Kto teda na tu farmu moze ist? preco ste urcili len bicykle, chodcov, kone a motorove vozidla? Co ine vozidla? Nemoze sa to urcit napr. podla toho, ze zakaznici? Aka je tam dopravna znacka?
simon-rada (2022-02-13 14:48:46+00:00): Motorové vozidlo je už sám o sebe široký pojem, vstúpiť môže každý ale len cez jednu bránu ostatné sú len pre pacovníkov.
aceman444 (2022-02-13 14:52:46+00:00): Ved prave preto sa na to pytam. Povolili ste skoro vsetko, okrem par specialnych pripadov, co velmi nedava zmysel. Preto sa pytam co tam naozaj ma byt a mozeme to urobit lepsie.
aceman444 (2022-02-13 14:53:29+00:00): A teda vstup pre pracovnikov alebo vlastnikov je access=private. To Vam opravim.
simon-rada (2022-02-13 14:57:29+00:00): Vstúpiť sa môže aj na kamióne lebo tam je firma ktorá spacuváva folie, vozia tam štrky, vyvážajú jahňatá..... všetky motorové vozidlá majú vstup povolený
simon-rada (2022-02-13 14:57:58+00:00): dakujem za vaše úpravy
aceman444 (2022-02-13 15:01:23+00:00): To chapem. Preco teda nemozu ist napr. ludia na kolieskovych korculiach? Preco ste tych nepovolili? Preto ta pytam, ci sa to neda nastavit nejako vseobecnejsie a podla ucelu navstevy, nie podla formy dopravy. A ked ste odstranili ten obchod, potrebuju tam chodit nejaki zakaznici? Alebo tam teda chodia len zamestnanci firiem v areali?
simon-rada (2022-02-13 15:04:33+00:00): je tam obchod, ale nie ovocia, je tam predajňa ovčích mliečnych výrobkov
aceman444 (2022-02-13 17:23:22+00:00): Vyborne, doplnene. Takze zakaznici tam mozu cez tu hlavnu branu a k tej budove kde je obchod. Dalej len zamestnanci, teda access=private.
simon-rada (2022-02-13 18:38:37+00:00): do budovy môžu zákazníci, v budove je predajňa
user_5359 (2022-02-17 14:25:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1030928131, http://www.osm.org/way/1030928130. What is the meaning of the tag mand = wo?
felipeeugenio (2022-02-17 14:40:53+00:00): Thanks
Is man_made=works. Obviously a typo. I'll correct it when I reach a computer
user_5359 (2022-02-17 14:49:03+00:00): No hurry, it's done
felipeeugenio (2022-02-17 14:50:50+00:00): Thank you very much

Regards
aceman444 (2022-02-13 14:43:40+00:00): Za tie access=no dakujem. Ale name=Kontrolny bod je zbytocny, ked uz je tam military=checkpoint. Inak checkpoint ma byt bod na ceste, ktoru kontroluje, takze to Vam opravim.
eggie (2022-02-13 16:12:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2022-02-14 12:52:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет спортивную площадку с названием "Футбольное поле". "Футбольное поле" - это не название. Пожалуйста, смотрите статью:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F  
  
Вид спорта указывают с помощью тега sport:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:sport
Andreas Binder (2022-03-06 15:50:17+00:00): Deine Meldung https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3050043 hast Du noch auf dem Schirm?
mavl (2022-02-14 12:54:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет наименование объекта "Лакированные корни сосен". Это не очень походит на наименование. Больше походит под описание. Пожалуйста, проверьте информацию.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
Arnaud Champollion (2023-06-28 13:06:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Le champ "nom" semble avoir été utilisé à la place de "description" pour signifier un accès fermé.
Le "nom" est réservé au nom propre du chemin, lorsqu'il en possède un.
Pour décrire les autorisations et interdictions, utiliser plutôt l'attribut "accès" voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:access
aceman444 (2022-02-13 15:59:59+00:00): Pozemok je monument? Preco ste neurobili co sme Vam pisali?
gscholz (2022-03-19 06:31:06+00:00): Hi Ching-Yi,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Cedro de São João"and "Propriá"

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-36.81957&lat=-10.35196&zoom=11

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117357389

I have reverted it now. Please use JOSM if you edit relations to get proper warning messages if you try to upload such kind of errors.
Kind regards
Guido
Protoxenus (2022-09-06 09:53:06+00:00): Hallo, du hast in deinem Änderungssatz straßenbegleitende Fußwege hinzugefügt. Das ist nur notwendig, wenn es eine bauliche Trennung zwischen Fahrbahn und Fußweg gibt, wie ein Grünstreifen, ein Geländer oder ähnliches. Ansonsten reicht es, wenn die Fußweg-Attribute an die Straße kartiert werden. Roting-Programme können das nicht unterscheiden und wählen i.d.R. den kürzeren Weg. Nutzer dieser Programme sind irritiert, weil sie z.B. aufgefordert werden, auf der Straße zu laufen, obwohl es daneben einen kartierten Fußweg gibt. 
Und, wenn man ein Fußgänger-Routing über separat kartierte Wege macht, muss man im schlimmsten Fall bis zur nächsten Kreuzung laufen, obwohl man jederzeit die Straße überqueren könnte.
Gruß Protoxenus
heidebub (2022-09-06 18:53:46+00:00): Ok, danke für den Hinweis. Ich werde ihn zukünftig berücksichtigen.

Gibt es mich nun Handlungsbedarf - sprich, sollen die prallel zur Straße verlaufenden Fußwege wieder entfernt werden?

LG
Heidebub
Protoxenus (2022-09-07 14:21:51+00:00): Ja, das wäre nicht schlecht. Wie gesagt, die OSM-Datenbank ist nicht nur zur Kartendarstellung benutzbar, sondern auch für das routing. Wenn an einer Straße, wie z.B. in Markgrafenheide "Waldsiedlung" an die Straße direkt die Fußweg-Eigenschaften gemappt sind, kann man die separaten Fußwege entfernen. Wichtig ist es, darauf zu achten, dass die separaten Fußwege immer da, wo es möglich ist, ohne Hindernisse die Fahrbahn zu erreichen, auch mit dieser verbunden sind. Dazu sind z.B. Einfahrten oder Überwege geeignet.
Gruß Protoxenus
heidebub (2022-09-07 18:52:44+00:00): Ok, dann nehme ich mir die Wege demnächst noch mal vor.
LG
Heidebub
aceman444 (2022-02-13 15:59:09+00:00): Ak je tam aj nejaky pamatnik zakreslite ho samostatne.
highflyer74 (2022-08-03 12:39:05+00:00): Moin!

Ein kleiner Tipp: Wenn StreetComplete fragt, um welche Art von Parkplatz es sich handelt, schau immer genau, was gemeint ist. Beispielsweise ist dieser hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24954411 kein parking=street_side sondern ein parking=surface. Schau dir dazu mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking an.

Schönen Tag Dir!
Matt McCutchen (2022-02-13 15:19:57+00:00): Details:

- US 40 Alternate to the west of MD 17 is signed "West Main Street" at least as far west as the intersection with North Pointe Terrace and then "Old National Pike" at the intersection with Old Hagerstown Road.  I couldn't confirm the exact location of the name change (I didn't want to consult other sources for which there might be licensing issues), so I'll make the reasonable guess that it happens at the boundary of Middletown, and I'll use Knoll Side Lane as a convenient approximation rather than introducing another node.

- MD 17 north of US 40 Alternate is signed "North Church Street" as far north as the intersection with West Green Street and then "Myersville Road" at the intersection with Pete Wiles Road.  Again, I don't know the exact location of the name change, but signed house numbers suggests it is near the boundary of Middletown, so I'll assume that.  If gluing the new node to the Middletown boundary is inappropriate, feel free to change that.

- MD 17 south of US 40 Alternate is signed "South Church Street" starting from that intersection.

- Fix spelling of "Koogle Drive" and make it one-way northbound.

- Add signed turn restrictions in both directions for the sharp turn between West Main Street and Walnut Street.

survey:date is 2022-02-12 (apparently I forgot to add it).
Matt McCutchen (2022-02-13 15:31:13+00:00): When I entered Sewer Plant Road from West Main Street, the road goes only a short way before it becomes a footway; I recorded the cutoff point by GPS.  I couldn't survey from the other side to determine how much of the way is a footway because the Knoll Side Place entrance is signed "No motorcycles" and I had my motorcycle (not a car) and didn't want to take the time to walk.  (The restriction on motorcycles might be worth mapping in its own right, but I'm not pursuing that now.)  So my tagging of the rest of the footway is a guess based on the width of the way as seen in imagery; I thought it was better to go ahead and do this than leave a note that no one may follow up on any time soon.  Feel free to change the data if you know better.
fabiotofy (2022-02-14 07:39:10+00:00): però tutti la chiamano la "tangenziale EST di Udine" ... direi che la possiamo elevare comunque a superstrada anche se manca il guardrail che divide le due corsie di marcia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117358649
alessandrocarmeli (2022-02-28 17:50:27+00:00): non credo, più che tangenziale e un raccordo o circonvallazione...
tolioalessandro (2023-11-10 12:08:10+00:00): Ciao voschix,
vedo che negli attraversamenti pedonali lungo percorsi ciclopedonali aggiungi il tag bicycle=dismount. In realtà è sbagliato, se l'attraversamento peodnale collega due percorsi in cui è ammesso il transito di biciclette puoi restare in sella anche nell'attraversamento. Secondo il Codice della Strada e i relativi pareri del Ministero, lungo un percorso ciclopedonale l'attraversamento da disegnare a terra è esclusivamente quello pedonale, in quanto quello ciclabile o ciclopedonale si possono utilizzare solamente quanto i percorsi afferenti hanno almeno una parte riservata esclusivamente alla biciclette. 
Puoi approfondire qui:
https://benzinazero.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/problematiche-ciclabili-pareri-ministeriali-tema_4_rev4.pdf

Grazie del tempo che dedichi alla mappatura e aggiornamento della rete ciclabile su OpenStreetMap.

Alessandro
tolioalessandro (2023-11-10 12:22:09+00:00): Per essere più preciso, il riferimento è a pagina 22 del documento linkato, penultimo paragrafo, dove il Ministero dice i conducenti hanno facoltà di restare il sella alla bici.

A presto,

Alessandro
voschix (2023-11-10 15:34:04+00:00): Ciao Alessandro,
Conosco da anni questo parere. È molto ambiguo. Il problema è che questa interpretazione è sicuramente solo conosciuta fra gli addetti al lavoro, sicuramente non presso gli automobilisti normali. Poi bisogna stare anche attenti alla differenza fra "si può attraversarla" e l'aspetto precedenza. C'è chi dice che, si, puoi attraversare in sella, ma non hai la precedenza sul traffico sulla strada, precedenza che hai solo se attraversi a piedi. Se non fosse così, che cosa serve la distinzione tra un attraversamento pedonale e un attraversamento ciclabile? Ci sono segnali orizzontali e verticali diversi per i due casi. Ho deciso di mappare in modo cauto in vista di questo casino.

Per inciso, l'italia è uno dei pochissimi paesi che conosce la differenza fra attraversamento pedonale e ciclabile.

Volker
tolioalessandro (2023-11-11 08:49:23+00:00): Ciao Volker,
il Codice della Strada italiano è già sufficientemente incentrato sull'auto, relegando gli altri utenti fuori dalla linea di margine o a cavallo della stessa. Imponendo all'utente di scendere dalla bici anche quando non è richiesto stiamo contribuendo a rendere la vita al ciclista ancora più complicata di quella che già è, disincentivando la mobilità sostenibile. 
Il parere del ministero dice chiaramente che su un percorso ciclopedonale promiscuo non si possono utilizzare altri tipi di attraversamento se non quello pedonale, sui quali al ciclista è consentito rimanere in sella.
Imponendo al ciclista di scendere anche quando non è richiesto stiamo rafforzando l'idea dell'automobilista che sulle strisce pedonali possano attraversare solo pedoni. Stiamo contribuendo a rafforzare una cultura sbagliata, smentita pure dal parere del ministero.
Sarà poi l'utente a scegliere di scendere dalla bici se lo riterrà più sicuro, ma scrivere che è necessario scendere è falso e fuorviante.

Inoltre così facendo potrebbe contribuire a rendere i percorsi meno appetibili da parte dei navigatori più accurati per la ciclabilità, che potrebbero prediligere la strada per evitare all'utente la scomodità di dover scendere dal mezzo un sacco di volte ad ogni attraversamento.

Alessandro
voschix (2023-11-12 07:19:57+00:00): Posso chiederti intanto di non modificare i "dismount" che ttovi nel database.
Sono d'accordo sulle tue affermazioni sull'autocentricità ecc.
Se hai una proposta di migliorare la mappatura, apriamo una discussione sulla mailing list, prima di modificare la mappatura esistente. Andiamo con calma. Grazie.
Volker
tolioalessandro (2023-11-12 08:28:17+00:00): Ciao Volker,
va bene, le cose che ho già aggiustato venerdì sulla base del parere ministeriale sono già modificare. Ma prima di procedere ulteriormente scrivo a Talk-it. Grazie.

Alessandro
voschix (2023-11-12 20:10:22+00:00): Non mi avevo detto come volevi la cambiare la "mia" mappatura. 
Sono cosciente che è mai stata proposta formalmente (come tanti altri aspetti della ciclabilità).
tolioalessandro (2023-11-12 21:23:08+00:00): Propongo di sostituire semplicemente bicycle=dismount (che come hanno fatto notare in Talk-it equivale a un bicycle=no, in quanto quando smonti diventi un pedone) con bicycle=yes.

Grazie e a presto,

Alessandro
tolioalessandro (2023-11-24 10:48:59+00:00): Ciao Volker,
da come si sono espressi gli utenti in Talk-it sulla mappatura degli attraversamenti pedonali che connettono due tratti di percorso ciclopedonale, c'è unanimità per l'uso di bicycle=yes.

Riprendo a correggere la mappa allora, buona giornata!

Alessandro
user_5359 (2022-02-17 14:55:44+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on my correction onhttp://www.osm.org/way/281730047. I changed the key gebouw to building.
Herrieman (2022-02-14 17:01:01+00:00): Hi, je hebt een heleboel ways verwijderd (voornamelijk waterway=drain). Kan je toelichten waarom je dat gedaan hebt?
Ook zie ik dat je vangrails getagd hebt waar geen vangrails zijn (Drie Merenweg). Misschien kan je daar ook nog een keer naar kijken.
Je bewerkingen: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117359444
user_5359 (2022-02-17 13:58:19+00:00): Hallo. Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030950404. You add the tags 
blinds = yes
blinds:colour = green
blinds:height = 1.20
But the main key is blind (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=blind)

Hallo. Kijk eens op http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030950404. Je voegt de tags toe 
blinds = yes
blinds:colour = green
blinds:height = 1.20
Maar de belangrijkste sleutel is blind (zie https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=blind)
user_14547832 (2022-02-15 01:56:20+00:00): The Dallas North Tollway Expansion has yet to appear on satellite imagery.
abakus_uploader (2022-02-13 23:31:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2022-02-26 11:58:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are  accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
map a residential area around a cluster of minimum 4 buildings and tag it as place= hamlet ect. Marking an area as village is not correct. this needs to be tagged as landuse=residential



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117360079
pbnoxious (2022-02-14 12:25:35+00:00): Hi,

jetzt gibt es die Langfeldstraße 13 doppelt, vermutlich ist eine der Adressen nicht korrekt.
Da du Ortskenntnis zu haben scheinst, kannst du das ja vielleicht verbessern :)
Frodolf (2022-02-14 12:27:14+00:00): Ich prüfe das. Danke.
aTarom (2022-11-10 07:29:40+00:00): Hola Toni Serra, alguna raó per a treure una "s" al nom del carrer Pablo Picasso?

Versió 15 del següent enllaç 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82466078/history

Salutacions
legofahrrad (2022-02-13 18:16:13+00:00): Hallo Wieland,
ist hier auf diesem Weg "bicycle=yes" korrekt? Nach deinen Änderungen stehen dort nämlich Schilder, die die Einfahrt für Fahrzeuge aller Art (darunter auch Fahrräder) verbieten.
Dann müsste "bicycle=yes" entfernt werden…
Viele Grüße!
wielandb (2022-04-05 10:34:11+00:00): Hey legofahrrad,
du hast recht, das ist natürlich falsch! 

Ich habe es vom Weg runtergenommen und mit https://github.com/wielandb/osm-beschilderung/commit/df14d5f788e29c608fe9fe639f17e1e66e82d7f0
meiner App beigebracht, das in Zukunft von selbst zu machen. :)

Grüße, 
Wieland
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-02 14:24:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524843311/history

Czy to jest stacja koncernu PKN Orlen czy nie?

Bo w tej edycji dodano tagi twierdzące i jedno i drugie
RafalKrk (2023-01-03 11:23:45+00:00): To jest Orlen. Skasowałem not:brand:wikidata. Nie wiem jak on się tam dodał bo na pewno ręcznie go nie wpisywałem
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-03 12:01:09+00:00): Dzięki wielkie! Zastanawiam skąd się on wziął, trochę już takich edycji widziałem ale jeszcze nie wiem skąd się one biorą (może źródło błędu jest już poprawione).
TravGW (2022-02-13 16:21:53+00:00): This changeset reverts the following changesets by user tpatte02. 
116765294, 116765128, 116759937, 116759620, 116759320
Sandal man (2022-02-14 14:28:39+00:00): Hola, gracias por tus ediciones, pero ¿qué son estas líneas sin etiquetas?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030951420#map=19/42.66465/-0.56359
davidenosm (2022-02-14 14:50:44+00:00): Hola! uy! pues lo reviso en casa....ayer edité muy rapìdo y son sendas que las dibujé y no etiqueté...
Gracias por el aviso!
aceman444 (2022-02-13 17:38:33+00:00): Vymazat to nie je riesenie. Dajte nejaku linku na to, ze je to pamiatka.
*Martin* (2022-11-19 17:29:46+00:00): Please don't add culverts just because JOSM validator complains about crossing waterway and highway. Many of them you added are actually fords. You can't see that from Ortofotomozaika SR.
Dimacn (2022-02-13 17:57:59+00:00): Тип простых проездов service (а не residential). Классификация дорог принятая в OSM - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
TravGW (2022-02-13 16:37:13+00:00): This changeset reverts the following changesets by user tpatte02.
112235702 112235450 112235205 112234778 112234423 112233942
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-17 13:59:19+00:00): You tagged the border of a wood as a path.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117361295
riiga (2022-02-13 17:34:37+00:00): Hej!

Skulle du kunna förklara vad som behövde fixas på t.ex. Linköpings supercharger? Det ser ut som att du har tagit bort adressen till den och en del andra användbara taggar.
NKA (2022-02-13 18:11:59+00:00): Dette endringssettet retter opp mange feil som en nederlandsk bruker gjorde for en tid tilbake:

* Taggen socket:tesla_supercharger_ccs er ikke "godkjent" - Teslas socket for V3 ladestasjoer er den samme som socket:type2_combo

* Det var mange feil i fordelingen mellom socket:type2_combo (V3) og socket:tesla_supercharger (V2)

* Sammenblanding av brand og operator

* Ladestasjonene har ikke egne adresser. Adressene tilhører en annen bygning i nærheten som da vil få duplikat av adressen.

Osv.
riiga (2022-02-13 18:20:36+00:00): Vi har duplikat av adresser i Sverige eftersom vi inte har en nationell import. Alla affärer i samma byggnad får t.ex. samma adress så att de blir sökbara.

Sen vänder jag mig också mot namngivningen. Det finns ingen skylt på platsen som säger "Tesla Linköping Supercharger". Jag namngav den ursprungligen bara "Tesla Supercharger" vilket är gränsfall det med. Informationen borde ligga i övriga taggar som t.ex. operator, brand, branch, adress, m.m.
archie (2022-02-13 18:44:17+00:00): Det verkar som att name-taggen har fyllts på ganska oreflekterat med uppgifterna från Teslas databas/katalog. Det verkar vara ett rakt övertagande/kopiering av databas/katalog-uppgifterna. I en textbaserad databas har uppgiften "Tesla Uddevalla - Hogstorp Supercharger" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9355862663) säkert ett berättigande. Men i en geodatabas som osm är det här väl ett no go. Vad som anges i name-taggen framgår redan av geodatabasen.  "Tesla Supercharger" är väl ett brand som Tesla själva använder. Då är väl osms brand-tagg det givna målet. När det gäller Uddevalla - Hogstorp - den här uppgiften ger riktigt mycket mening i Teslas databas - men vilken information tillför den i name-taggen på osm? Om den skall vara med så är väl det rimligaste målet osms branch-tagg.
NKA (2022-02-13 19:21:50+00:00): Navnene er de samme som brukes på Tesla's websider. Jeg bruker formatet <brand>+<branch> for name-taggen, f.eks. slik som for "ICA Supermarket Lammhult". Samme diskusjon kunne man ha om alle kjeder (supermarkeder, bensinstasjoner, osv).

Det er viktig at navnet kan søkes etter i appene, og at resultatlisten når man søker etter ladestasjoner i Linköping skiller mellom f.eks. Tesla og InCharge, og at ikke alle heter bare "Linköping".

Taggingen følger Nordic Charging Station Import. Gi gjerne kommentarer der. Hittil har ingen interessert seg i Sverige, før i dag :)

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74869