piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
Supaplex (2016-11-30 07:41:56+00:00): Google有版權噢，不能描完後用在OpenStreetMap上
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
chnav (2016-11-30 15:27:03+00:00): Здравствуйте, более опытный участник просил вас не менять названия микрорайонов и не делать сокращения. Пожалуйста прислушайтесь к его совету, в ОСМ во многих случаях принято писать полное название.

Кроме того, пожалуйста ничего не удаляйте пока не приобретете достаточно опыта. Возможно данные, которые вы удаляете, используются кем-то таким образом, о котором вы ещё не подозреваете. Не рисуйте карту под рендер, это основной принцип.
ff5722 (2016-11-30 09:50:28+00:00): 嗨，你加的桥是不对的，应该分开现有的道路，然后加bridge=yes在新的部分。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge#How_to_map
当还不是明白我可以给你图片
ff5722 (2016-11-30 09:55:45+00:00): 还有在交叉口 应该加一个连接点
但是，最多你添加的看起来好
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
chihchun (2016-11-30 10:48:54+00:00): Please do not use Google Map for tracing.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
user_5359 (2016-12-04 09:56:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
Supaplex (2023-07-28 03:57:57+00:00): 請問你在六年前加的托比的家，是否屬於公共性質的地方，如果只是朋友家的話，請善用各種 app 或網站的書籤功能
user_5359 (2016-12-04 09:59:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Unfortunately, your website has a bug (GoDaddy problem?), so that the nature of your business can not determine.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
literan (2016-12-23 22:07:06+00:00): бар да полиция, чо, отличный спорт :-))
user_5359 (2016-12-01 05:10:33+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-01 05:10:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
user_5359 (2016-12-01 05:09:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
MiroJanosik (2016-12-06 08:03:36+00:00): Ahoj, keška je niečo skryté a tajné, nemalo by to byť na mape :)
Okrem toho to nie je "turistická atrakcia", a ani to nie je pevná a trvalá vec ktorá by mala byť na mape.
Takže tento bod zmažem.
MiroJanosik (2016-12-09 09:11:56+00:00): Žiadna reakcia, odstránené.
Nakaner (2018-07-15 08:19:32+00:00): Hallo,

weißt du, ob es Absicht war, im Bahnhofsumfeld landuse=greenfield zu verwenden? Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456739991#map=19/49.91119/12.19097

Viele Grüße

Michael
soemisch (2018-07-16 13:22:02+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,

ich habe diesen Bahnhof (Er steht nicht in der Liste.) nicht persönlich betreten, aber uns stehen die Pläne des Bayernsfahrplans zur Verfügung.
https://www.bayern-fahrplan.de/de/zusaetzliche-informationen/stationsdatenbank
Diese Pläne und das Hintergrundbild sind die Hilfe, um den Bahnhof zu gestalten. Deshalb habe ich die beiden Flächen mit Hecke und Wiese als Greenland eingezeichnet.

Viele Grüße, Lars
Nakaner (2018-07-16 17:26:35+00:00): Hallo Lars,

ich hatte eigentlich angeommen, dass du die Bedeutung von landuse=greenfield weißt. Na gut, nicht so schlimm. Ich finde es halt etwas komisch, Blumenbeete als Neubaugebiet zu erfassen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=greenfield?uselang=de

landuse=grass  ist für solche Fälle passender.

Viele Grüße

Michael
soemisch (2018-07-17 05:51:07+00:00): Hallo Michael,
ich habe die beiden Grünflächen angepasst.
Viele Grüße, Lars
literan (2016-11-30 10:57:11+00:00): если вы обозначаете вырубки, то для них естьсвой тег - landuse=logging (и его надо не поверх леса рисовать, а исключать из него, мультиполигоном или еще каким-то образом). natural=fell в Подмосковье нет и быть не может.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 05:01:20+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-01 05:00:20+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
SomeoneElse (2016-12-06 19:41:04+00:00): For info, I've removed the "name" from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456745571 as it's really not named that.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
user_5359 (2016-12-04 09:57:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! You forgot to add any information to your node.
geow (2017-05-14 17:20:22+00:00): Hi Marsupium, du hast in diesem Changeset in der Schellingstraße (zw. Türken- und Arcis) einen baulich getrennten Gehweg eingetragen. Nach meiner Erinnerung ist dort beidseitig nur  ein normaler Gehsteig, der bereits korrekt mit sidewalk=both als Merkmal der Schellingstraße erfasst ist.

Sollte das zutreffen, würde ich mich freuen, wenn du die separaten Gehwege entfernen würdest. 

Danke,
geow
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
user_5359 (2016-12-01 04:59:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:26:52+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
literan (2016-11-30 10:45:50+00:00): зачем "Фрунзенскую" открыл? она до февраля закрыта. Откачу.
sirorezka (2016-11-30 13:56:27+00:00): Извини. Я знал, что её закрыли. Но, когда увидел, что на неё нет входа, подумал, что это какая-то ошибка.
literan (2016-11-30 16:44:48+00:00): ну, войти нельзя, значит входа нет)) извиняться не надо, все ошибаемся, я в том числе. Я обычно если что-то существенное исправляю, отписываю автору.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 04:55:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-03 19:20:13+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Hjart (2016-11-30 10:16:03+00:00): Jeg har lavet et par rettelser til mindestenen, som jeg synes gør den lidt mere meningsfuld
bocaj52 (2016-11-30 21:39:22+00:00): Takker
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:58:44+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:27:56+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Maarten Deen (2017-01-11 19:02:19+00:00): In diese changeset werden eine anzahl van neue bus relations angelegt, z.B. 6750655, 6750656, 6750658 mit nur wenige members.
Ist das gewollt?
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:22:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:28:49+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:19:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:29:30+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
philippec (2019-11-28 20:25:00+00:00): Ik wilde vandaag op een trefdag aan ambtenaren deze aed tonen op mijn smartphone.  Door uw verandering lukte het niet.  Verander niets wat u niet ten gronde kent en zeker niet in het buitenland.
mueschel (2019-11-28 21:05:17+00:00): Hi,
please check the history of the node to see what happened.
3 years ago you added a link here, but you put it as a key and not as a 'mapillary' tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4528208427/history

I fixed that according to the definition of he mapillary key in the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mapillary

I don't know what you mean by saying it didn't work today, but the mapillary image was linked as it should be according to the wiki.
M!dgard (2019-12-04 00:32:32+00:00): Nederlands hieronder

mueschel is right, this is the way we have been linking to Mapillary images since ages. Maybe you can ask the OsmAnd devs to recognize it, they are pretty responsive and easy-going folks.

It's not like mueschel is mass-changing these tags, they just fixed it while fixing a very clear mistake. It's also not a change that requires local knowledge, so it seems a bit unreasonable to call them out for it like that.

---

mueschel heeft gelijk, zo mappen we Mapillary-foto's al sinds jaren. Misschien kun je de OsmAnd-ontwikkelaars vragen die te herkennen, ze gaan goed om met zulke verzoeken.

mueschel zit hier niet in bulk deze tags aan te passen, hij heeft het gewoon en passant ook veranderd bij het verbeteren van een duidelijke vergissing. Het is ook geen verandering waarvoor lokale kennis nodig is, dus het lijkt me niet erg redelijk hem daarvoor zo ruw aan te spreken.

Groetjes,  
Midgard
Supaplex (2016-11-30 11:20:18+00:00): Google有版權噢，不能描完後用在OpenStreetMap上
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-18 18:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44496385 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in Taiwan
Polarbear (2016-12-27 14:13:51+00:00): Hallo Bot45715,

seit wann gibt es denn diese Auffahrt auf die A100?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456758392

Kann ich auf keinem Luftbild 2011-2016 oder aktuellen Mapillary-Fotos erkennen. 

Sollte es sich um eine Baumaßnahme handeln, bitte ich um entsprechende Kennzeichnung.
Polarbear (2017-01-06 13:25:00+00:00): Fiktive Auffahrt entfernt in CS 44952932. Leider keine Reaktion von dir, daher war eine Ortsbesichtigung notwendig. 

Sequenz mit 6 Fotos: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/NCp8RySrZedQWCmJd0D1-g

Hier ist keine neue Auffahrt seit November 2016. Auch war hier angesicht des Baumbestandes, des Zustands der Pflasterung und der Leitplanken, in den letzen 10 Jahren keine Behelfsauffahrt.

Ich bitte, das Eintragen fiktiver Objekte zu unterlassen.
Polarbear-repair (2017-01-06 18:18:52+00:00): Welche historische Bedeutung hat eigentlich das alte Eisenbahngleis https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453732009 und woraus leitet sich für ein unbenutztes Gleis die Höchstgeschwindigkeit ab? (historic=railway, maxspeed=40)
Luis36995 (2016-11-30 19:15:02+00:00): "Adding houses, sidewalks, vegetation, addresses, businesses and other pertinent information." Your comment does not agree with your change, can you explain it?
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:13:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:30:13+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Klumbumbus (2016-11-30 14:03:33+00:00): How do you know that these are oneways?
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:12:56+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:30:44+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:12:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:31:17+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
dgitto (2016-12-10 15:57:46+00:00): Ciao. Il tag name dovrebbe contenere solo il nome proprio di un oggetto, se esiste. Cabina elettrica è il nome comune di tanti oggetti del genere. Per questo esiste il tag apposito, cioe building=transformer_tower + power=substation.
inoltre di solito hanno gli angoli a 90 gradi :-). Buon mapping
francoLI (2016-12-10 16:13:57+00:00): è proprio il suo nome, quella strada si divide secondo i 'cassunara' fra prima e dopo la cabina elettrica. Gli angoli... perchè è ortogonale alla strada e  non al nord.....,-)
un problema invece riguardande gli arbusteti, tradotti con macchia mediterranea, termine buono per la costa, ma non azzeccato per l'Etna, ove ve ne stanno almeno di tre tipi. ci sta già qualcosa o.......
francoLI (2016-12-10 16:14:27+00:00): e sugli agrari abbandonati?
dgitto (2016-12-10 17:59:19+00:00): per gli angoli intendo dire che se disegni a mano dovresti poi "ortogonalizzare" (basta davvero poco: con ID c'è la scorciatoia da tastiera "S")
dgitto (2016-12-10 18:19:24+00:00): Per il nome, non insisto certo. Se ti va rimettilo.
Per landuse e landcover, puoi solo indagare sul wiki e sulle altre fonti.
Io qua sui peloritani per adesso metto "forest" quando si verificano le condizioni: alto fusto + abbastanza ravvicinati + mantenuta dall'uomo.
francoLI (2016-12-11 09:34:55+00:00): Salve,
non parlavo della differenza di 'wood' e 'forest', fin qui ci arrivo, anche se per quasi tutta l'Italia si dovrebbe usare forest (che poi in italiano foresta e bosco sono equivalenti).
Il problema è 'scrub' che dovrebbe essere tradotto almeno come 'arbusteto', e sull'etna di 'scrub' ce ne stanno almeno di tre tipi, io cerco di differenziarli tramite il rendering dei simboli, ma non mi  sembra la soluzione ottimale
muzirian (2017-05-03 10:28:53+00:00): hi, can you please take a look at this junction
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 01:40:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:34:27+00:00): [Bulacan, Rizal, Muntinlupa, and Batangas] add/modify various POI's, tag number of floors, correct typo on municipal hall name.
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:08:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 10:08:02+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
mueschel (2016-12-03 15:27:16+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du mal nach diesem Way schauen? Das Tagging stimmt nicht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456767918

Gruss, Jan
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:08:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 10:08:59+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
ajashton (2016-11-30 23:31:58+00:00): Hi. Is 9876867676 meant to be a telephone number? Also curious about the strange name and denomination for a restaurant.
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:07:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the value of opening_hours: You use twice the value "Sunday closed"
m902 (2016-11-30 23:59:46+00:00): What you have added to the map is nonsense. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456769614 does not represent a real feature on the ground. I have deleted it. You are causing damage. Please STOP.
m902 (2016-11-30 13:58:29+00:00): Hi, you are duplicating many existing streets e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456771026. Please consider very carefully what you are doing and now take the time to repair what you have done. Thank you
glglgl (2016-11-30 14:19:54+00:00): I just reverted this changeset as asked in the German language forum.
Lea27784 (2016-11-30 14:23:13+00:00): @glglgl: Thank you!
cadsauxk (2017-03-01 17:53:44+00:00): Olá Colega, obrigado pelas contribuições.

Eu vou fazer uma correção nas suas edições, OK? É que você marcou vias residenciais como trilhas, vou converter para  residencial não pavimentada, (highway=residential & surface=unpaved)

abraço
user_5359 (2016-11-30 18:53:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:34:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435481 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44059399 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:34:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435477 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44059647 because there was a problem with licence of data use
user_5359 (2016-11-30 18:46:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:33:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435455 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44059789 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:32:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435453 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44059840 because there was a problem with licence of data use
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-30 13:54:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44060541 where the changeset comment is: nahrungspolitischen Vandalismus revertiert