piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-08-27 18:18:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BCNorwich (2019-08-28 08:56:47+00:00): Hi, Way: 592100875 does not appear on the County Council Definitive Map. Do you have means to show it's a public footpath, if not could you please amend your tagging.
BCNorwich (2019-08-28 08:59:06+00:00): Sorry I now see you didn't add the public footpath designation. The above logic still applies though.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-27 04:32:19+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4005012 ?
mavl (2019-12-04 09:01:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
eisa01 (2024-06-28 17:42:34+00:00): Hello, why did you set access to private on some roads? Your comment indicates just using satellite maps
harahu (2024-06-28 22:24:49+00:00): By law, this road cannot be access=private, only motor_vehicle=private. I guess that is what was intended in this changeset.
ma-rt-in (2019-08-27 21:36:59+00:00): Hallo,
zu deiner Information: Die Zwei Node´s zu den Fahrad Luftpumpe/Schläuche habe ich entfernt, da diese bereits erfasst sind.
vg
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
kildm (2019-08-29 00:42:38+00:00): Добрый день. Подскажите, зачем вы удалили POI с карты? Если я не ошибаюсь, больше половины из них еще актуальны!
viloan (2019-08-27 19:16:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-31 08:49:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272435475/history has maxspeed:advised = 20 mph that was added in this edit
Is it just less-used duplicate of maxspeed:advisory ?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:advisory

Is there any reason to not change to more widely used key?
tms13 (2025-08-02 11:55:13+00:00): I was unaware of the newer one.  I'll use that from now on.
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-09-14 22:09:39+00:00): Men, this is a path, don't name it.
bdentremont (2025-01-19 16:51:53+00:00): You've added names to many nodes within the Memphis airport taxiways.  Can you leave a comment on the following note about what these are?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4592305
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
stefanct (2020-02-08 19:10:24+00:00): Hi SelfishSeahorse,
the tags you were using to indicate the sexes of this toilet are wrong/non-standard. Please take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:male
keujfl839237 (2020-02-14 08:50:56+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your correction!
aceman444 (2019-10-26 14:59:53+00:00): Hi, it should be diplomatic=consulate. Other tags of your's seem to be OK.
Stereo (2019-11-04 23:05:32+00:00): Hi aceman444,

So office=diplomatic + diplomatic=consulate + consulate=honorary_consulate ?
aceman444 (2019-11-04 23:12:32+00:00): Yes, consulate=honorary_consul , but only where it is honorary consulate. There are other types of consulates too.
See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Ddiplomatic for the combinations.
eggie (2019-08-27 19:54:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-27 19:57:43+00:00): Dag Punchy.. Een mooi streven, maar in OSM gaat dat iets anders. Gebouwen worden periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. Je kunt dat versnellen door een verzopek te doen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. Je zet dat de URL erbij. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
Dus niet zelf intekenen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-27 20:00:37+00:00): Je kunt evt. al wat laten importeren.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=prinses%20alexialaan&resultOffset=0&objectId=0327100000298336&geometry.x=156193.57500427&geometry.y=458468.37399851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0327010000298338

Doe je dat verzoek zelf. inlog identiek aan
OSM account https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
pUnchY_NL (2019-08-28 06:43:13+00:00): Bedankt voor je reactie. Ik heb op het forum een BAG import verzoek gedaan. Ik zal dit huis verwijderen. Ik was al op zoek geweest hoe ik uit BAG makkelijk iets kon importeren of kopieren, maar daar is dus een tool voor. Goed werk!
groeten,
Rob
eggie (2019-08-28 07:11:32+00:00): Oke... , maar die tool waar je uit de BAG kunt importeren vergt een hele brok ervaring met editor JOSM en de bijbehorende plugin. Je kunt dit dus het beste even aan de "baggeraars" 
overlaten.
Gr eggie
mavl (2019-10-02 09:37:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
BCNorwich (2019-08-28 07:00:08+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The info you added is all correct, I just added addr:country=GB.
You might like to consider adding the floor level ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level )
Also I would find it helpful if visiting you to know where to enter the building. So maybe map the building entrance leading to your offices and place your POI near this entrance.

If you need help please just ask. Regards Bernard.
fntamap (2019-09-13 09:51:55+00:00): Hi,
May I ask you why you are deleting pathes that DO EXIST in the field ?
If those pathes can be proved to be private, there are appropriate "access" tags to document their status.
If those pathes are not highly practicable, there are appropriate ways to document the fact.
toeklk (2019-11-17 10:53:56+00:00): I can confirm that the paths still exist (and are accessible), passed here today
toeklk (2019-11-17 11:05:01+00:00): Reverted in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77185328#map=15/50.7454/4.6511
TikkeNamer (2019-11-17 11:48:05+00:00): last time I checked a path is a passable way by definition, but if OSM does it differently so it be
TikkeNamer (2019-11-17 11:49:18+00:00): My problem was mainly that people that see a path here would think they could pass there with their bikes/grandma/.. which wasnt possible when i went there but I didnt know about the passability thing so yeah
derredu (2019-08-29 09:35:27+00:00): Hallo Günter,
dein Eifer in Ehren, aber jetzt ist die Bromberschänke doppelt gemappt.
Schau mal hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265258132
Kannst du den Punkt wieder löschen bitte?

Grüße, derredu
günter pelzer (2019-08-31 14:06:35+00:00): Ich sehe in der Orginal-Karte nicht die Bezeichnung.  Vor einiger Zeit hatte ich hierzu per Mail die Unterstützung von Fachleuten gebeten. Ohne Ergebnis. Jetzt wo ich selbst eine Lösung gefunden habe, wird kritisiert ohne eine Lösung vorzuschlagen. Das Besser wissen ist einfacher als das besser machen. Es darf jeder meine Änderungen korregieren oder löschen.

grüße günter
derredu (2019-09-01 16:54:10+00:00): Die Lösung lautet: Bau dir die Karte, die du dir vorstellst einfach selber. z. B hier=
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/

Was du machst nennt sich "Tagging für den Renderer". Dazu etwas Lektüre:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
highflyer74 (2019-09-01 17:14:16+00:00): Moin Günter! Du wurdest hier nicht kritisiert, sondern nett auf einen Fehler hingewiesen. Die Idee bei OSM besteht darin, dass wir uns gegenseitig helfen, die Datenqualität hochzuhalten. Insofern ist es ganz normal, dass mal Nachfragen von Mit-Mappern kommen. Die Idee dahinter ist, dass man sich als Mapper weiterentwickelt und über die Zeit immer weniger Fehler macht. Das würde nicht funktionieren, wenn die erfahrenen Mapper den nicht so erfahrenen "nur" hinterher räumen. Nur so als Gedanke ;-)

Schau Dir gern mal den Inhalt folgender Links an:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielleicht hilft das weiter. Viele Grüße!
eggie (2019-08-27 20:39:13+00:00): Dag Eusie... Het is een node zonder adres dus die kun je gewoon helemaal verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
DD1GJ (2019-08-28 08:57:01+00:00): Hallo, es ist nicht notwendig, überall "Rheinsteig" dranzuschreiben. Dieser ist als Relation erfasst und wird dadurch auf entsprechenden Wanderkarten angezeigt, z.B.

https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=3366121&map=16!50.4542!7.3908

Du kannst den Namenszusatz daher wieder entfernen.
günter pelzer (2019-08-31 14:11:38+00:00): Erklären sie das  bitte dem rheinsteig Wanderer der hier vor einigen Wochen auf der Suche nach dem Rheinsteig verstorben ist. In den wanderkarten fehlt der aktuelle Standort oder in der Regel sind die wegbeschreibung wenn vorhanden nicht aufgeführt. Ich mache diese Angaben nicht für Fachleute sondern für Laien. Es ist ihre Verantwortung was sie mit meinen Änderungen machen. 
Meine Angaben sind nicht falsch deshalb werde ich sie auch nicht korregieren. 
Mit freundlich grüßen
Günter pelzer
kreuzschnabel (2019-08-31 18:23:06+00:00): Das name-Tag ist nicht für beliebige Beschriftungen da, so sinnvoll sie auch sein mögen, sondern ausschließlich für den Namen des entsprechenden Objektes, also hier des Weges selbst (als Bauwerk). Die Namen aller Wanderrouten, die ihn benutzen, stehen in den entsprechenden Relationen, mit denen die Wanderrouten in der Datenbank abgebildet werden, und können von jeder geeigneten Karte (z.B. https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14!50.454!7.3819) ausgewertet und dargestellt werden. 
 
Es liegt in der Verantwortung jedes Wanderers, geeignetes Kartenmaterial zu benutzen, auf dem der Weg auch gefunden wird. Entsprechende Karten sind nicht nur Fachleuten, sondern natürlich ebenso Laien zugänglich, deshalb verstehe ich dieses Argument nicht. 
 
Gegenfrage: Würden Sie gegenüber an die B9 auch „(für Radfahrer gesperrt)“ als Name dransetzen mit Hinweis auf einen  (hypothetischen) Radfahrer, der da kürzlich verunglückt ist?
günter pelzer (2019-08-31 20:10:47+00:00): Danke für den Link. Ich werde immer wieder bei der Pflege der Wege nach dem Rheinsteig gefragt. Mir fehlt die Arroganz die
das fehlen der Karten anzumahnen und zu dem Radfahrer ich werde mich gerne lächerlich machen um einen Unfall zu verhindern. 
Löschen sie bitte meinen User. Ich nutze direkt Google Maps.
mavl (2019-10-02 09:37:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
felixeee (2019-10-02 17:34:47+00:00): Hallo, weißt du zufälligerweise ob der Weg unterhalb der Hausnummer 16 noch weiter ins Tal läuft? Zumindest die Satellitenbilder lassen das vermuten und ganz unten ist ein Wegweiser eingezeichnet. Siehe auch Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1890997# . Grüße!
SHuehne (2019-10-02 23:07:01+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1890997#
pio2_122 (2019-08-27 20:56:40+00:00): Coś się popsuło i dodałeś tagi przystanku do linii toru: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216867267
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
PT-53 (2019-08-28 06:57:16+00:00): Hallo geo-ranger,
schau Dir mal die Kommentare zu diesem CS an:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73695195
phidauex (2019-08-27 21:27:07+00:00): Hi! One more tip - when drawing buildings, don't forget to use the "q" shortcut to square up the corners of your building after sketching them - it makes for a much cleaner final product.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73814133
stefanct (2021-05-27 20:47:45+00:00): Was ist die Quelle für die Namen "Alm" und "Landhaus Ermann"?
panoramedia (2021-05-27 21:24:14+00:00): Steht an den Häusern dran.
phidauex (2019-08-27 21:25:18+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for your additions to Greeley. For the addition of the wildlife sanctuary, while "zoo=wildlife_park" is close, I think "leisure=nature_reserve" may be a more appropriate tag. Zoo tags, even for wildlife parks, tend to imply a secured and managed environment, usually with a defined entrance and exit, and fees or tickets needed. For a park that is defined for protection of native species, nature_reserve does a bit better job. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73814502
Jediah Cummins (2019-08-30 21:44:26+00:00): Thanks I have made this change, appreciate the feedback and I will take a look at the full tag set to help better familiarize myself with the possibilities and select appropriately
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73814502
phidauex (2019-08-30 22:35:51+00:00): Thanks for updating! The tag system is extensive, flexible, and indeed, frustrating. ;) There is a bit of an art to which tag combination is most appropriate for a feature.

One thing that can help is to join the OSM US Slack Channel: https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/ where you can pop in and ask questions, or get another set of eyes on an issue. Folks there are quite experienced and helpful. The /r/OpenStreetMap reddit can also be a good place to ask for recommendations. Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73814502
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
BCNorwich (2019-08-28 14:03:29+00:00): With Way: 4999101 you are actually triplicating the landuse=residential tag. You have the building tagged landuse=residential, you have several multiploygons of a few buildings tagged landuse=residential and you now have the whole Sittingbourne area tagged as landuse=residential. Bit of a mess to say the least.
viloan (2019-08-27 21:47:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ForstEK (2019-12-29 15:44:53+00:00): Hi, 5R-MFT! You are marked street lamps as "highway=streetlamp" but right it should marked as "highway=street_lamp". Please read wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstreet_lamp and retag those objects, otherwise application using openstreetmap data can't correctly show and render them.
5R-MFT (2019-12-30 18:54:38+00:00): Street_lamp are retagged. Sorry.
ForstEK (2019-12-31 13:47:13+00:00): Thanks! Happy new year!
chachafish (2019-08-28 12:17:36+00:00): Hello and thank you for your additions to the map. The street tags you added to a number of houses here, "N Williams Street" are not actually correct. The Street in front of these houses is, "Williams Street", not "N Williams Street". Could you go back and correct them? Thanks :)
gregw66 (2019-08-28 15:30:40+00:00): I'll be happy to remove the 'N' on Williams. I live on Williams St and about 2 years ago the post office changed the street name on my address to N Williams St. Google maps also reflects this change. Should I still revert these, removing the 'N'? Thanks!
chachafish (2019-08-28 19:46:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for your reply. Yeah, I know the post office will do that. The thing is that in Denver anything south of Ellsworth will have an actual address of "South". Anything north of Ellsworth, even though it is "North" will not have the name "North" attached. You can see this on the street signs. If you go outside and look at your street sign, you'll see "North" is not attached to the actual name. In OSM we follow the rules of verifiability and "Map what's on the ground". Below are a couple of links to point you to the rules as well as an image I photographed just a few days ago in your neighborhood. Google is not used nor referred to in OSM due to legal issues. So, yeah the addresses should be changed. If you have any other questions please feel free to ask ;) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=h99IdaEXAJeVz6Em0AZD1g&focus=photo&lat=39.77282777777779&lng=-104.96601944444444&z=17&x=0.3852717494104699&y=0.32643828446493256&zoom=1
gregw66 (2019-08-28 19:55:25+00:00): Coolio -- thanks for your help!
3ngineer (2020-11-19 06:31:06+00:00): Hi, just wanted to mention that these building names you added are incorrect, and I deleted them. Both sides of this SkyTrain station can access the inbound and outbound platforms.
frosm (2019-08-28 08:40:28+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
je réagis à votre demande de vérification.
votre chemin a plusieurs problème : 
- ll traverse un bâtiment : le batiment n'existe plus ou le chemin n'est pas assez précis ?
- il est superposé à une piste cyclable : est-ce que ce cela signifie que c'est un chemin partagé ?
- il est superposé à un chemin : il faut couper la partie du chemin commun pour éviter d'avoir 2 chemins superposés.
- le tracé au sur ouest est surprenant. si la vue aérienne on ne voit rien, c'est un nouvel aménagement ?
- il traverse une rivière sans pont ni gué
Leo Slager (2019-08-28 23:32:40+00:00): In Vijfhuizen is wat schade ontstaan door het verslepen van een wegsegment.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73815730
Leo Slager (2019-08-28 23:34:32+00:00): Het was gelukkig makkelijk te repareren.
Leo Slager (2019-08-28 23:51:00+00:00): En in Hoofddorp heb ik de self-intersecting ways vervangen door een multipolygoon.

Daarmee zijn alle foutmeldingen weer opgelost.
eggie (2019-08-29 06:36:59+00:00): Dag Hendrikklaas, 

De natural = water was ook verdwenen langs het liniepad. Dat heb ik net hersteld. 
boat=no was ingevuld, maar de regel natuarl=water was verdwenen. :)

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-29 06:37:43+00:00): naturarl ?  natural :)
Hendrikklaas (2019-11-24 23:17:38+00:00): Beste Eggie, Boat no is een oude tag waar ik gen borden voor kan vinden. Maar ik heb m laten staan.
Hendrikklaas (2019-11-24 23:26:00+00:00): Leo bedankt.
Eggie je kunt zelfs JOSM niet vertrouwen.
eggie (2019-11-24 23:27:24+00:00): Als het water maar blauw is....  :)
Gr Eggie
Richard (2020-03-30 18:28:13+00:00): Hi - by changing this from highway=cycleway to highway=path, you've destroyed the information that bikes are allowed to use this path. I've repaired those that I can see by adding bicycle=yes, but could you check all those you edited? Thank you.
phidauex (2020-03-30 20:33:28+00:00): Hi, I do a lot of cycleway cleanups, and would potentially recommend going further in order to retain compatibility with major cycle renderers and data consumers:

True multi-use path:
highway = path
bicycle = designated
foot = designated

Cycleway, but foot traffic is allowed (probably wider, may have center stripe, may have "bike" in the trail name):
highway = cycleway
foot = yes

Footway, but bicycles are allowed:
highway = footway
bicycle = yes

What doesn't tend to make a lot of sense is something like highway = footway and bicycle = designated. If it is designated for bicycles, then it is a path or cycleway.

More tips here: https://github.com/BikeOttawa/OSM-Bike-Ottawa-Tagging-Guide

Hope this helps - phidauex
phidauex (2020-03-30 20:36:19+00:00): CyclOSM gives a good idea of how data consumers see the relationship between paths with or without "designated", which I find helpful for identifying mismatches between the intended use a path and the tagging: https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=17/41.71700/-73.96699/cyclosm