piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
black_bike (2019-03-04 19:02:43+00:00): Hallo,
wenn JOSM oder andere Prüftools etwas nicht kennen, heißt das nicht, das es falsch ist. Ich verwende diese Art des taggings , da es damit möglich ist Mehrfachnutzung eines Gebäudes (Wohnen, Handeln, Büro, Gastronomie) zu kennzeichnen. Das im 
Wiki beschriebene building:use=residential beschränkt sich auf die "überwiegende" Nutzung. Meine Art der Kennzeichnung hat leider noch keine Beschreibung im Wiki erhalten.

Liebe Grüße aus Ratingen

PS: Sehen wir uns am Do im Labor?
Mannyy (2019-03-04 19:31:31+00:00): Denke schon, dann bis Donnerstag
Gruß Werner
opendcc (2018-07-21 08:41:43+00:00): Hallo,

meinst Du, den Teufelsgraben sollte man mit intermittent=yes taggen - der hat doch nicht immer Wasser - d.h. fast nie ...
ppcom2018 (2018-07-26 08:25:43+00:00): Hi!
Der Teufelsgraben hat ab Höhe Erlenstrasse 14 immer Wasser. Dort kommt der Bach aus einem Rohr. Bis zu dieser Stelle verläuft der Bach unterirdisch. (Bin da aufgewachsen - beobachte den seit 40 Jahren :) )
ppcom2018 (2018-07-26 08:37:50+00:00): Sollte man die ca 1 km unterirdischen Bachverlauf (also bis es bei Höhe Erlenstrasse 14 wieder ans Tageslicht tritt) auch einzeichnen? Wenn ja, wie?
opendcc (2018-07-26 10:35:21+00:00): Hallo,

eben, lokale Kenntnis ist durch nichts zu ersetzen und mit den anderen Zeugs kann man ja zusammenhelfen. Dort wo der Wasserlauf unterirdisch ist: waterway ditch/stream, layer=1, tunnel=culvert.

So wie an der ehemaigen B12: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474386746
gormo (2018-08-23 12:08:53+00:00): Hallo, Schächte sind man_made=mineshaft und disused=yes oder historic=yes. Adit ist ein Stollenmundloch! Korrigierst Du das noch? Wäre super :-)
koegel (2018-11-17 11:00:42+00:00): erledicht
literan (2018-07-21 11:26:15+00:00): а зачем вы это сделали? церковь это все здание, а не одно из заведений в нем.
eggie (2018-07-21 20:17:45+00:00): Top!
mikko_tamura (2018-07-21 15:32:24+00:00): mass deletion - when we checked the data set in the area. There seems to be points with no tags. Cross validating it with data in OSM - the points did no show up in the OSM webpage. We then did deleted the points and drew the buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60927085
GOwin (2018-07-23 00:27:46+00:00): And those empty nodes appear to have been generated during an earlier mapathon led by your project, mostly by user "ohmyjacjac".

That person appears to have deleted buildings, some of which look geometrically correct, although slightly enlarged, and with some offsets. If they are still part of your mapping team, it might be worthwhile to check their workflow.

By the way, your project still doesn't have the list of mappers working in your effort:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/PRCVCAD_Project
mikko_tamura (2018-07-21 15:33:08+00:00): no imports were conducted. digitizing target areas based on actual bing imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60927166
juminet (2018-07-23 06:43:09+00:00): Bonjour. Bienvenue sur OSM et bravo pour vos premières éditions. S'il il y a un bloc qui limite l'accès au sentier, vous pouvez ajouter qqch comme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abarrier%3Dblock. Vous pourriez également ajouter foot=yes & bicycle=yes pour signifier que le sentier reste accessible aux piétons et vélos (selon votre connaissance du terrain). 

Est-ce cela que vous cherchiez? 

juminet
Aurélien Paternostre (2019-10-09 11:35:25+00:00): Chemin Privé non accessible au public sauf sous autorisation. Ce chemin ne fait pas la Liaison avec le sentier de Miremont.
olo81 (2019-11-06 14:17:58+00:00): Coś tu poszło nie tak z tymi hydrantami :x 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.26699&mlon=19.13469#map=19/50.26699/19.13469&layers=N
eggie (2018-07-21 20:26:35+00:00): Beste mapper... Het gebied van je edit is zo groot omdat je de wegen plakt aan de administratieve grens België- Nederland. 
Beter is het om wegen nergens aan vast te plakken. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-07-21 20:34:07+00:00): Paden losgemaakt van grens en wat losse einden verbonden.
Davileci (2023-09-08 22:25:12+00:00): Las plantas que no son árboles se pueden etiquetar con natural=plant, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural=plant, o con natural=shrub, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural=shrub, si son arbustos.
abakus_uploader (2018-07-21 22:31:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Liqid1010 (2018-07-30 12:13:52+00:00): Mozem vediet zdroj prosim?
Rick Richards (2018-07-31 17:15:45+00:00): Jasné, pre detailnejšie informácie boli mojim zdrojom aktuálne fotografie na stránke http://www.kosice-estranky.sk a moja osobná návšteva miest, ktorých sa úprava týkala, týka, alebo bude týkať. Modernizácia je ukončená, už len čakám na spustenie premávky a všetky veci v tejto oblasti uvediem do pôvodného stavu.
Anazaar (2018-11-18 13:53:03+00:00): Witam

Czy ta droga aby na pewno jest oznakowana jako jednokierunkowa?
ArnaudJ59 (2018-07-21 13:11:14+00:00): Why are you modifying a laundry in Lille, France, to give it an address in New York, USA ?
ArnaudJ59 (2018-07-21 13:58:43+00:00): I reverted your change because it looks like it's a mistake :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60931316#map=19/50.64717/3.05829
eggie (2018-07-21 19:45:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mbethke (2018-07-21 13:40:53+00:00): Hola Gabriela,
lo he cambiado un poco a tu adición porque tourism=apartment es solo para apartamentos alquilados para turismo. Me parece place=neighborhood es más apto para la Ciudadela Santa Ines (o como una Map Not ya disse, "Urbanización Santa Ines", no se cual es el nombre oficial).

saludos,
Matthias
Ale_Zena_IT (2018-07-22 07:04:45+00:00): Scusa, ma perchè inserisci modifiche errate?
Hai allineato su ESRI non fidandoti nè del PCN nè di Telespazio, e va bè. Ma questa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608063665 intanto è chiusa (e verrà abbattuta) e non vedo il motivo per il quale riaggiungere oneway=yes, ma soprattutto 3 corsie dove le vedi?
EneaSuper (2018-07-22 07:58:22+00:00): Ho ripristinato la versione precedente, quindi i nuovi allineamenti non esistono più.
I nuovi tag sulla rampa invece sono stati semplicemente un errore, che probabilmente volevo inserire in un altra strada.
Comunque fin da quando ESRI Clarity è stato inserito su JOSM l'ho sempre adoperato in quanto le sue immagini sembrano ben georeferenziate e focalizzate rispetto a quelle offerte dalla concorrenza.
Purtroppo però non conosco né il PCN ne Telespazio...
tomhukins (2020-02-27 13:39:15+00:00): Thank for for helping to improve the map.  Kensington Palace is already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/904705 so I've deleted this duplicate node.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-24 17:30:29+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60931711
kuhni74 (2022-01-07 10:46:58+00:00): bitte betreffend Steinfeldspitze um Beteiligung an https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3000422
Warin61 (2018-07-22 22:32:07+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution. 

The way 609727892 you introduced for parking is not correct. Ways should not cross themselves .. in this case they need to be separated up into 3 individual ways.
Chan_13 (2018-07-23 08:24:55+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the message. It looks like you corrected it already?
Warin61 (2018-07-23 10:43:30+00:00): Sorry, yes I corrected it. But wanted to pass the information on to avoid repeats. 

Keep mapping, there is heaps to do.
4004 (2018-07-21 20:10:45+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
алые маки закрылись?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-07-23 08:39:00+00:00): Merci pour ajouter le chemin. Il y avait une chemin 'footway' qui a été carté deux fois; j'ai supprimé la copie
GeoJess (2021-05-20 18:41:12+00:00): Hi,

It looks like a series of building in this area may have been digitized with incorrect shapes. Kindly review your edits in this area and make adjustments. Let me know if you need any help. 

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jesspher
5m4u9 (2018-07-23 15:04:48+00:00): gracias por añadir los nombres de las calles de sacaba, hace falta revisar toda la zona, hay muchas calles nuevas
Jez Nicholson (2019-06-14 13:26:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609743705 appears to be an inner part of Heath Wood relation, but not physically inside it....i'm guessing you want it to be an inner of Hog's Trough Bottom.
freebeer (2019-06-08 06:16:38+00:00): howdy,

could i pick your brain to understand your intention behind the residential boundary https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/397331 , presently broken?

your changeset comment points to the brokenness at the west end of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49085161 where the other end of the boundary arrives from the north, but at this point intersects not this road but the slightly offset boundary parallel to this highway, to which this boundary does not belong.

would it be better to have the neighbourhood follow boundary lines where possible (until the end of the mentioned highway segment) or were your intentions to connect the boundary line to the physical highway with a short (centimetre?) link where what defines the outline changes, keeping boundaries separate?

i hope you understand i can see too many ways to fix this, but i'd prefer to know your intentions for mixed cases like this.

thansk
FvGordon (2019-06-08 08:51:08+00:00): I have seen the FIXME in some versions of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49085161 to separate boundaries from ways.
I think, that boundaries should not be connected to ways like also power lines shouldn't. When I made the edit in this changeset, the ways of the residential relation were not all loaded - so the JOSM validtor could not check, if the outline was a closed loop.
I just fixed the residential area outline by using the boundary (notthe highway) as a member in this relation.
Jaku103 (2018-07-21 16:25:45+00:00): Just to let you know I added a fixme tag to the building, so it stands out to alert editors to the problem.
Supaplex (2018-07-21 15:23:10+00:00): 請問綠地有名稱嗎?
abakus_uploader (2018-07-21 22:31:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
apm-wa (2019-06-30 00:35:09+00:00): Pagta zawod или Pagta kabul ediş harmanhansy?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-07-26 12:32:08+00:00): Você tirou o nome da rua Capitão Mendonça e colocou num ponto. porque fez isso? está incorreto. pode corrigir por favor?
tux67 (2018-07-21 16:19:55+00:00): Nicht schon wieder Parks bitte ...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60933736
highflyer74 (2018-07-22 14:37:12+00:00): @simon484, dies ist eine Grünfläche in einem Wohngebiet und kein Park. Hör' bitte auf, so einen Unsinn zu mappen. Danke!
abakus_uploader (2018-07-21 22:31:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2018-07-21 20:05:54+00:00): Dag Red Ray.. je commentaar komt niet overeen met je edits...
keithonearth (2018-11-26 04:21:26+00:00): This looks like the name of a school, but is on a road. Can you please clarify if it is the name of a school or a road.
eggie (2018-07-21 20:12:55+00:00): Justin. oneway = no zet je alleen op wegen als je het vermoeden hebt dat iemand er een oneway=yes van zou maken. 
Bv. een parallelfietspad. 
Een voetpad zal heen oneway=yes krijgen. 
MVG,
eggie
Jaku103 (2018-07-21 18:15:48+00:00): Sorry, but I just noticed this one. Be careful with deleting certain nodes that come in with the GNIS import, You can find them nearby the area. Usually across the street, and around the corner. This particular one has changed names over the years. But, is across the street. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/QCzedugtuC_YVGyWJyQsFw
Frans S (2018-08-02 12:03:30+00:00): Hello, I am validating (reviewing) this task and noticed that you forget regulary to square a mapped building . Please square every building after mapping. ( I take care of these ones)
johantiden (2020-08-10 06:35:26+00:00): Maybe we should just remove these. Its just confusing and there is no reference to any source for the proposal.
mweper (2018-07-23 00:59:14+00:00): Hola serock. La etiqueta junction=roundabout está mal puesta en este caso. En este caso sería junction=circular, ya que lo que sería "Bv. Rondeau" cruza por el medio. Por favor, cambialo.
-
Mas info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:junction%3Dcircular
serock (2018-07-23 03:56:44+00:00): Justo eso iba a preguntar en el foro por este tipo de rotondas, las cuales son atravesadas por el medio por alguna ruta, avenida, etc. y por lo que entendí en al wiki, al contrario de las roundabout, estas si llevan oneway=yes.
Ya lo cambio y gracias por el dato, saludos.
mweper (2018-07-23 14:54:44+00:00): Claro. Si se coloca la etiqueta junction=roundabout el software sobreentiende que es de mano única y no hace falta añadir oneway=yes (oneway se ponía anteriormente para compatibilidad con ruteadores desactualizados). En cambio, con "circular", como dice en la wiki, puede ser mano única o no. Saludos.
user_5359 (2018-07-21 20:51:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node in the building with the same house number.
4004 (2019-02-20 17:37:29+00:00): are you sure this restriction is still there? there is this note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1653419#map=18/54.72235/25.76169&layers=NG
and footage doesn't seem to show any restrictions https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=aWCswiKnR97UPTO9vjet8w&focus=photo&lat=54.72256360580653&lng=25.763514116430432&z=17&x=0.48361789018812484&y=0.6608828133741931&zoom=0
eggie (2018-07-21 19:47:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-07-21 19:51:36+00:00): Je hebt de landiuse=residential van Sloten verwijderd. Waarom?
Verder heb je nogal wat schade aangericht aan het wegennet. Wat is je bedoeling in je bijdrage voor Openstreetmap? Graag reactie.
Je edits worden teruggezet
eggie (2018-07-21 19:57:04+00:00): reverted by changeset  #60938292
eggie (2018-07-21 19:59:52+00:00): Wanneer je een landuse=residential gaat verschuiven en die zit vastgeplakt aan het wegennet dan komt het wegennet ook mee. Je krijgt dan wonderlijke effecten die de kaart geen goed doet. 
MVG,
Eggie
Dit was je changeset
eggie (2018-07-21 19:59:57+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60935621
AndersAndersson (2018-07-22 22:46:01+00:00): Hej och välkommen till OSM!
En sak att tänka på är att flygfoton väldigt ofta är förskjutna. Om man slår på GPS-spår kan man dra i flygbilden så att den stämmer med genomsnittet för GPS-spåren. Ju mer kuperat område det är, desto sämre brukar det stämma. Säg till om du vill ha bättre förklaringar.
BAK365 (2018-07-23 12:19:02+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Du hast Strasse und Hausnummer korrekt eingetragen, ein name=* für das Haus ist darum nicht mehr nötig. Mehr dazu siehe hier [1]. Wenn du Lust hast, könntest du das Gebäude noch hinzufügen.

Weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen! Wenn du Fragen hast, einfach melden.
BAK365
.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
jaap de vries (2018-07-21 19:09:55+00:00): Oke, misschien is het handiger om bij een volgende keer " Ik heb een take-away toegevoegd bij station Dieren" Nu lijkt het of je bedoeld dat iemand anders dit moet uitvoeren.
Succes Jaap!
ThomasChurchman (2018-07-21 19:22:03+00:00): Hoi Jaap, bedankt dat je meekijkt. :)

Ik heb een programmeerachtegrond, waar vaak een imperatieve schrijfstijl aangeraden wordt voor aanpassingen.

Zie bv. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/tree/Documentation/SubmittingPatches?id=HEAD#n133

Oude gewoonten...
bisonprarieafternoon (2018-08-18 17:39:14+00:00): Hello, just curious where you can find information on this park I can't seem to find evidence of its existence, did you maybe mean to mark this as residential area? 

Also the name was put on the top right node rather then the area just a fyi.
typebrook (2018-07-22 00:52:51+00:00): 都畫成建築物了,那就再加個building=roof 好了XD
TimothyFire (2018-07-22 03:01:14+00:00): 收到收到，亂中有錯，沒有好好優化，感謝教學 XD
BCNorwich (2018-07-22 15:09:31+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 
Thanks for aqdding the name to the green. I've removed the tag landuse_1=park. The area is not a formal park, it's formally a green space. If it were a park then landuse_1 would not be the correct key anyway. 
Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2018-07-22 16:44:37+00:00): Hi, I've marked the phone amenity as disused, as per OSM practice.
BCNorwich (2018-07-22 17:00:54+00:00): Hi, is the seat available for general public use? If not then perhaps private=yes ought be used.
Regards Bernard
Jiggyman (2018-07-22 17:17:50+00:00): It looks like my description didn't make it through the edit. Although on private land the original seat was placed by a local farmer over 20 years ago (before the millenium seatson the green) to allow residents and visitors to relax and enjoy the area. The farmer died a couple of years ago but his sons have recently renewed the seat. I understand that the intention is still that it is for public use.
BCNorwich (2018-07-22 17:45:04+00:00): Hi, that's good to know thanks, and very generous of the landowner.
I pass by here frequently on walks and always forget check out the phone box. Do you know if the red box is used for any specific purpose? 
Regards Bernard
Jiggyman (2018-07-22 18:11:15+00:00): At the moment the phone box is still awaiting a new use. A couple of the nearby residents have started giving it a bit of TLC beginning with a nice new red paint job.
nasirifard (2018-07-30 09:05:19+00:00): You are always mapping without comment: How should anyone notice what you've changed?
BCNorwich (2018-07-22 17:37:28+00:00): Hi, have the two section of cycleway east of the road (north and south of the bridge) been removed?
AlCol (2018-07-22 19:07:53+00:00): Hi, will check when I bike past!
AlCol (2018-07-25 07:01:01+00:00): There is no path on the East side of the road south of the bridge. North of the bridge, the path doesn't go south past the point where it crosses the road just off the roundabout.
Hjart (2018-07-21 19:52:46+00:00): groups of trees are commonly tagged as "forest" even if they are newly planted.
Michael Wo (2018-07-22 06:29:56+00:00): These trees are "bonsai" trees. They are 2.5 m heigh for years now. Someone must cut them every year. That was the reason that I avoided "forest" and choosed "scrub". But what is your opinion for the right tag in this special situation? Still "forest"? Or is there a third even better tag?
Hjart (2018-07-22 10:08:26+00:00): Maybe it could be considered a large hedge area?
Michael Wo (2018-07-22 18:46:43+00:00): Yes, that sound ok and is maybe the reason for these "bonsai" oak trees. So I'll change the area to a hedge area. 
Thanks for helping me.
Hjart (2018-07-22 19:00:12+00:00): You are welcome. I've added a description to the area
BCNorwich (2018-07-22 16:59:03+00:00): Park and recreation ground tags removed, leisure,sport and surface tags amended to suit OSM practice.
viloan (2018-07-21 20:00:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2020-03-01 12:34:10+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it has just a 'triple' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5775653178

Thanks!
gormur (2020-03-04 00:07:30+00:00): Fixed, thanks.
viloan (2018-07-21 20:29:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Hjart (2018-07-21 22:14:21+00:00): Which imagery are you using here? Please note that if you are not using the national danish SDFE aerial imagery you may be introducing errors that didn't exist before
animaux (2018-07-22 05:56:14+00:00): Thanks for your message. I did use ESRI imagery to match against my survey observations. Is the SDFE aerial data ok to use for OSM as background? Will double-check.
animaux (2018-07-22 06:03:05+00:00): SDFE seems to match my changes well enough I think.
animaux (2018-07-22 07:25:51+00:00): Is it allowed to us SDFE terrain data as a background for drawing OSM maps?