piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-24 20:18:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7157523442/history has shop = mushroom that was added in this edit
shop=mushroom ? Is it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dheadshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsmartshop ? Or is it a separate shop category that should be documented as valid?

Is it maybe selling regular mushrooms for cooking, not narcotic ones?
bvarick (2025-11-24 20:23:26+00:00): This shop is just selling regular mushrooms, for cooking
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-25 09:58:59+00:00): would changing it to shop=food food=mushroom would be fine?

Big part of shop = mushroom were selling narcotic ones and this, I hope, would be more clear
bvarick (2025-11-25 17:13:41+00:00): Good suggestion, I changed it. Feel free to edit as you see fit.
viloan (2020-01-24 22:27:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Abruzzzo (2020-01-26 03:02:44+00:00): Dear Kyle,

Facebook disguises that these building footprints come from Microsoft ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Microsoft_Building_Footprint_Data ). So please follow the import guidelines before uploading larger chunks of them.

Kind regards,
Paolo
kylebarron (2020-01-26 03:07:15+00:00): I don't see your point. I'm not uploading a bulk import. For every building I visually check that it makes sense
Sjord (2020-04-19 19:06:12+00:00): Hoi Hendrikklaas. Jij hebt de Veerplas in Haarlem als wetland en meadow getagged, maar dat lijkt me niet correct. Was dat de bedoeling? De Veerplas is een klein meertje, en niet echt grotendeels begroeid met planten.
Asadov (2025-12-30 18:47:16+00:00): Помогите, пожалуйста удалить всю мою корректуру сделанную в 2020 году. В то время я сделал много ошибок. Сейчас сделанные изменения накладываются на границы земельных участков нанесенных в 2020 году. Удалите, пожалуйста, все  сделанное мною в 2020 году.
user_5359 (2020-01-25 05:08:53+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo in the key healthcare:specality (see https://www.osm.org/node/7157572989/history). I would not have mentioned the correction if I did not consider the information occupationally inappropriate for this key. I think it is better to see this as a standrad and not to mention it.
gpserror (2020-01-25 06:34:22+00:00): Oops I noticed I did make a whole bunch of typos recently, caught one, must have missed this one.  Not sure where I picked up this as the best way to tag a physical therapy shop that focuses on sports injuries.  And perhaps the stupid spelling of the shop (took a double take when I saw the store today) deserves it...  What would be the best way to tag these, I had been tagging them "clinic" but I don't think they deserve the icon they get.
gpserror (2020-01-25 06:40:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare%3Dphysiotherapist
RicoElectrico (2020-01-25 15:08:55+00:00): Cześć, w kilku twoich edycjach dodałeś pokoje gościnne dwa razy. Raz na obszarze budynku, raz jako osobny punkt. Powinny być one zaznaczone tylko raz. Poprawiłem to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80075064

 Patrz też https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Jeśli masz pytania lub potrzebujesz pomocy przy edytowaniu mapy, zapraszam na polskie forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
Qualhano (2020-01-25 21:32:41+00:00): Obrigado pela ajuda.
camelCaseNick (2020-01-25 00:52:50+00:00): Hey,
you have added node/7157624064 with a wikipedia tag. Would you please use the format wikipedia=language:page title for that.
Bilad al-Musa is the name of an article in Nynorsk (Norwegian) and one in English, so it needs specification which is meant.
On top of that, wikidata tags really make sense then. Have a look at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16841912 if it is the same thing and then add wikidata=Q16841912 please.
CamelCaseNick
viloan (2020-01-24 23:57:12+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jarek 🚲 (2020-01-25 02:18:34+00:00): Hi Clay. Can you expand on why you renamed the Niagara train to "Lakeshore West" train? This is not how they are branded by GO and that's not what is announced on the trains.
Jarek 🚲 (2020-01-25 02:19:46+00:00): Also, some of the PTv2 relations are now broken. When using JOSM, try to check for errors with gaps in ways.
clay_c (2020-01-27 17:20:12+00:00): At the time, the information I had available to me indicated that they are branded as Lakeshore West trains. I'm checking now and some online resources brand them as Lakeshore West with a dotted-line extension to Niagara, and some brand them as Niagara. Was this a recent change?

Looks like you're local to Toronto, so I'll defer to your judgment on this. I'm happy to change it back and restructure the relations—I just want to make sure I'm not overlooking anything.
Jarek 🚲 (2020-01-28 01:53:23+00:00): Hi Clay,

Yeah, it's a bit of a fluid situation. The Niagara trains were made year-round last September, but some maps are not yet updated and still say "summer weekend service" or similar.

On the weekend trains, the passenger announcements made are usually "This is a Niagara train making limited stops at ..."

The most authoritative written source I've used is https://www.gotransit.com/en/trip-planning/seeschedules/full-schedules which identifies the trains as part of Route 12, as opposed to Route 01-18 for Lakeshore West. Note that while the weekday trains (1954 and 1975) are included in the Lakeshore West tables (up to West Harbour), the weekend trains (e.g. 1960) are not. As another data point, booking Toronto to St. Catharines on viarail.ca gives GO options and lists the routes as "LAKESHORE" on weekdays and "ROUTE 12 - NIAGARA" on weekends...

I personally would have them as separate relations - they are clearly different services, with Lakeshore running half-hourly or better and Niagara being more of an excursion service. Another reason is it'll avoid having a clogged relation when all the variations of LW trains get added as individual PTv2 relations.

I would also prefer not having "GO Transit" in each of the names: it is repetitive, doesn't add much (there isn't any other "Lakeshore West line" nor "Niagara Falls / Toronto train") and duplicates the value of the operator and network tags.
clay_c (2020-01-28 20:06:44+00:00): Fair enough—I'll go ahead and re-separate the relations. Looks like there's a lot of route variants and one relation could become unwieldy.

As for the name=* tag, in the context of route relations it functions more like description=* and often duplicates data found in other tags. I find it personally helpful to have relations of the same network show up together in alphabetical order. For this, I may just shorten it to "GO".

Thoughts?
Jarek 🚲 (2020-01-30 02:23:31+00:00): Yeah the names seem alright now. Personally I'm still not a fan of the "from => to" duplication but I'll live with it
smootheFiets (2020-10-18 22:42:55+00:00): Moi kammah,
Bij dit changeset heb je peer ongeluk wat BAG-tags overschreven. Ik heb het net hersteld: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92670825
Groet'n, smootheFiets
Jakob48 (2020-01-25 11:38:12+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,

Frage:
Bist Du Dir da sicher mit den access=no bei den Forstwegen im Wald östlich vom Häuserlerhof?
Ein No würde auch den den Zugang für den Forstbetrieb ausschließen.
Darf dort niemand mehr durch? Oder sind das Privat-Wege.

Gruß Jakob48
woodpeck (2020-03-15 11:52:32+00:00): Hello Rick Sanchez, can you explain why in this changeset together with changeset 79740959 you changed the "ref" of the A1 motorway to a "nat_ref=19"? The Wikipedia entry for the A1 motorway clearly says that it goes all the way to Evzonoi, and the OSM route relation says the same. Why do you believe that some parts of it should not carry the ref=A1 tag?
aharvey (2020-03-03 02:53:11+00:00): Hi looks like this change the east bound road of Captain Cook Drive unconnected with Wollooware Road North is that right and still the case now? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81703749 re-added some of those connections for traffic, but without ground level imagery it's hard to verify which is correct.
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-14 02:51:58+00:00): Surveyed on 2020-11-10, the road is now connected (the roundabout has become a signalised intersection) so I've gone ahead and updated it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94093451
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 06:47:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89940988/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
vectro (2022-04-27 01:31:42+00:00): It looks like this changeset creates duplicate ways along the Aliso Creek Bikeway. Is there a reason for that? I would expect to see one way representing the geometry on the ground plus possible relations describing the different routes there.
Bill Sellin (2022-04-27 02:11:55+00:00): Not sure what you are calling out, but there is a unpaved hiking and riding (equestrian/dirt) trail as well as a paved Class I bike path / shared use path, so yes - esp for all terrain bikes there are duplicate ways.
vectro (2022-04-28 02:48:59+00:00): I see, thanks for clarifying. I had assumed that the unpaved bit was just the shoulder.
pnorman (2020-11-11 19:18:21+00:00): Hello,
I'm wondering you changed these from highway=track to a highway=service
viloan (2020-01-25 00:50:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 20:17:47+00:00): malicious deletion of large farmland

partially reverted, DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
MikeN (2020-01-25 01:38:25+00:00): Hi, how does 'ye' describe the changes here?
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 20:06:17+00:00): Deletion of existing buildings, killing a landuse relation w/o refinement. 
 
Reverted
Glassman (2020-01-25 03:08:30+00:00): Your edit looks good. Only thing you need to change is the service road tagging. Instead of driveway, it likely parking_aisle. Driveway is for the short section to your garage.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80057214
Glassman (2020-01-25 03:09:01+00:00): Same suggestion as your last edit. Can you make the change? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80057353
Glassman (2020-01-25 03:09:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80057419
chnav (2020-01-26 12:40:39+00:00): Здравствуйте, пожалуйста не пишите описательные названия, мы не викимапия. Автомойка отмечается тегом amenity=car_wash  

Исправлено
chnav (2020-01-26 12:42:18+00:00): Неужели так сложно нарисовать прямоугольное здание, что это за каракули ?  

Исправлено
TheSwavu (2020-02-01 10:08:21+00:00): Is this actually a fire station? It's a training facility, so I don't think there is a brigade based here.
Fizzie-DWG (2020-02-01 21:40:46+00:00): HI Swavu. Must admit I wasn't certain about this, Happy to take out the actual fire station tag if you think that's better? Thanks
Klaus Schwer (2020-01-31 01:41:40+00:00): Do you mean this deletion: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=78177999 ? 
I've just restored the deleted river segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112436189
viloan (2020-01-25 03:19:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
camelCaseNick (2020-01-25 23:31:05+00:00): Hey,
you have added a brand:wikipedia tag here.
There are multiple wikipediae in each a different language at least six of them have an article with the name Canada Post. Would you please use the syntax brand:wikipedia=[lang]:[article] to clarify which you mean?
Thanks.
CamelCaseNick
DENelson83 (2020-01-25 23:47:43+00:00): Yes.  "en:" is now added.  Thank you.
Warin61 (2023-02-11 03:28:04+00:00): Hi,

These numbers you have added to th eend of the fire station names... they seem to be 'station numbers' and not part of the name? Possibly they would be better tagged as ref= x where x is the station number??? 
See https://www.fire.nsw.gov.au/station_list/
Fizzie-DWG (2023-02-11 04:52:59+00:00): Hey Warin, I'm named them all a while back working of the Oz Guidelines that were agreed to at the time: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Emergency_Services. If you want to change that layout, you better bring it back on AU first.
Warin61 (2023-02-11 10:04:04+00:00): Dam! I missed that - just went straight to the long table under it . mutter mutter... !
XnL (2020-01-25 08:53:46+00:00): Пожалйста, не добавляйте в тег названия вид POI. Если в навигаторе набрать школа, то будет видны все школы независимо от названия. Если для отображения на карте, то мы не вносим теги под карту.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80059579
andrewwiseman (2020-02-06 19:27:14+00:00): Это река, а не дорога.

This is a river, not a road.
CmdrThor (2020-01-25 11:02:02+00:00): Hi, sorry to keep poking at your changesets but while this may be a census designated place Defiance should be left a place=hamlet. In OSM a hamlet is described as a community with 3-199 residents. As of the 2010 census Defiance had an estimated 155 residents. Towns are reserved for large populated areas with populations between 10,000 & 50,000.

See this wiki article for further information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_admin_level#Unincorporated_areas
user_5359 (2020-01-25 10:46:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
rosario_bianco1 (2020-01-29 13:43:03+00:00): mi dispiace che hai cambiato quello che ho messo hai levato cancelli hai cambiato strade  quello che o mappato e fatto per conoscenza diretta quei cancelli li ho fatto con le mie mani quelle strade li percorro per tre mesi ogni hanno io rispetto la tua esperienza  ma quando cambi una cosa devi esserne sicuro   credo che quello che ho messo prima io sia quello giusto   poi fai tu io non lo cambio  lo devi fare tu
freebeer (2020-01-25 18:42:51+00:00): there seems to be something very wrong here, with buildings added near null island
freebeer (2020-01-27 21:36:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80162565 where the changeset comment is: undo pileup at null island for a university wrongly tagged as a pokémon park
Jakka (2020-01-25 13:42:47+00:00): Vind dit toch uitzonderlijk dat een privé weg een naam toegewezen krijgt. Dat openbare weg uitkomt op privé grond OK, daarom is het nog geen privé tot daar ?? Graag wat toelichting
Jakka (2020-01-25 13:45:20+00:00): https://www.geopunt.be/kaart?viewer_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaps.geopunt.be%2Fresources%2Fapps%2FGeopunt-kaart_app%2Findex.html%3Fid%3D8ab2fcc96fc74753016fdcf2ea580079
vincent_rig (2020-01-25 14:25:12+00:00): Goh, kan je gelijk in hebben. Toen ik er passeerde leek het mij alleszins een gewone oprit, en geen openbare toegangsweg, dus ik heb er een dubbel gevoel bij. Hierbij de link naar Streetview. 
https://www.google.be/maps/@51.1337231,4.7754676,3a,75y,350.5h,76.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sEhHNIYPgyOJgFbuFeEEleA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
vincent_rig (2020-01-25 15:41:44+00:00): Een gelijkaardige situatie bestaat op de Itegemse Steenweg. De opritten leidend naar huisnummers 125 en 151 hebben op geopunt wel de naam 'Itegemse Steenweg', maar op Openstreetmap niet, de oprit naar 151 is zelfs niet getekend, dus er is op zijn minst een inconsistentie. Geen idee wat de correcte aanpak hier is.

https://www.geopunt.be/kaart?viewer_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmaps.geopunt.be%2Fresources%2Fapps%2FGeopunt-kaart_app%2Findex.html%3Fid%3D8ab2fcc96fc74753016fdcf2ea580079
Jakka (2020-01-25 18:47:26+00:00): Ik ga je moeten gelijk geven dat lijkt weinig op een openbare weg. Enige mogelijk is dat gemeente diensten verkeert invoerden.... Wat die andere betreft:
Is de bedoeling in osm database alle (openbare) wegen erin te krijgen. dus deze zullen nog ontbreken
Jakka (2020-01-25 19:03:03+00:00): naar 125 stukje benoemd, naar 151 lijkt mij ook raar dwars door erf en dan eerder een boerewegel/ track... die voeg ik niet toe...
iWowik (2020-01-25 14:17:44+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, к тому же нарушаете порядок наименования улиц (пишете слово улица с большой буква), а также пишете номера домов в тег названия и в тег населенного пункта (addr:city) пишете название муниципального образования.

Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их не просто найти.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-18 11:12:51+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3523051 ?
mueschel (2020-01-26 13:58:08+00:00): This changeset was reverted:
This changeset contains only wrongly tagged objects not visible on aerial images.
literan (2020-01-25 14:18:34+00:00): здесь надо было поставить теги пешеходного перехода (там же не просто светофор для авто): crossing=traffic_signals
highway=crossing. 

Я заменил
Blueberry (2020-01-25 14:14:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de ne pas détériorer OpenStreetMap par des contributions non justifiées.
Changeset annulé

Eric [Blueberry]
mueschel (2020-01-26 15:42:12+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the tag on this node?
http://osm.org/node/7158135364
'PA80' looks like some mistake.
d3mol3k (2020-01-26 16:53:22+00:00): to oznaczenia (w Polsce) przejazdów awaryjnych na drogach szybkiego ruchu - ich numery. 
https://goo.gl/maps/EjwPr4Qh5qdF7CKY8
nie wiem jak to inaczej - poprawnie - oznaczyć.
mueschel (2020-01-26 17:25:17+00:00): Ah I see. It could be tagged as traffic_sign=*, but on the other hand it's not an actual traffic sign.

I would go for a neutral tagging like:
marker = post
ref = PA 80
pio2_122 (2020-01-26 19:33:24+00:00): A valuable suggestion, I like it!
What do you think about additional tags (based on the JOSM and OSM-wiki schema)?

colour=yellow
distance=80
highway_ref (or: route_ref)=S3
location=overground
marker=post
material=metal
operator=Generalna Dyrekcja Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad
ref=PA 80
utility=highway
mueschel (2020-01-26 19:55:53+00:00): - if '80' is a distance/position along the highway, you could add 'highway=milestone' instead of marker=post

'Location' is not needed - this is more intended to show where the feature is (the one the marker points to), e.g. a pipeline.

'route_ref' is for bus lines and 'highway_ref' is something special from the UK, so I wouldn't tag this.

The rest seems fine.
d3mol3k (2020-01-26 20:47:25+00:00): Dzięki - będe poprawiał w takim bądź razie od początku ;) :
colour=yellow
distance=80
highway_ref=S3
location=overground
marker=post
material=metal
operator=Generalna Dyrekcja Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad
ref=PA 80
utility=highway
pio2_122 (2020-01-26 20:54:58+00:00): @mueschel
Hm..., highway=milestone will not be correct here, because it's used to mark exact distances. The distance on this plate has an accuracy of 1 km. The exact point with the kilometer of the road is marked with separate signs (https://znaki-drogowe.pl/urzadzenia-brd/wskazania-pikietazu-drogi).
In this case, this "marker" is located near 80km 300m of the road S3 (nearest milestone). So I guess in this case this tag is just unnecessary...

Do you have any idea how to tag the road number? This value is quite important because "PA 80" is not a unique ref and can occur on many other routes. So to search for a specific PA point you need to have the road number and the number of a given "PA".