piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
poornibadrinath (2017-03-30 15:33:56+00:00): Hi,
 I came across your edits and noticed you have named footways as dirt and steepdirt>> etc. Please note the name tags are meant for adding proper names of the features. You can always use surface tag to describe what is the surface of the roads. I have deleted those name tags from the features. If you think dirt surface tag needs to be added, you can add that surface=* tag on OSM. 
Best,
Poornima
lovedabikes (2017-03-30 15:54:50+00:00): Right was looking for a way for trails to show steepness with the default Mapnik rederer.  I understand your comments, just have not seen osm mapping data online where someone can see that a trail is steep.  It can be in the data, I agree but no one is using a render that shows that.  Please let me know of a resource if I am incorrect.
poornibadrinath (2017-03-30 16:00:46+00:00): Hi, 
  I think there are tags for indicating steepness. It's either highway=steep or highway=incline. You can add those tags if you need to indicate the steepness of the trial. Incline=up/down also works. 
Poornima
Alecs01 (2017-04-01 16:14:13+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, both restaurants were already on the map, see here http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4745270049 and here http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744927269 I deleted your entries
Alexander-II (2017-03-30 11:42:17+00:00): Что вы делаете? Зачем удаляете контур, а потом создаете заново? Какая у этого цель?  Последние ваши 4 правки не несут никакой пользы и смысла. Изменения будут отменены.
navstar1 (2017-03-30 14:17:10+00:00): Сделано это было лишь потому, что объект "Парк" и территория соседнего здания имели общую линию контура. При попытке задать название парку (Парк Новослободский ) происходила ошибка. После разделения контуров возможность присвоить имя парку появилась.
Собственно, это объяснение, зачем. Впрочем, я не настаиваю, если Вы считаете, что исходные вариант вернее. Или, возможно, Вы знаете иной способ задать имя собственное парку, а я не до конца понимаю, как работает инструмент.
Alexander-II (2017-04-05 23:48:34+00:00): Спасибо, что пояснили. Это на самом деле правильное состояние. Данный парк отрисован при помощи мультиполигона. И название задано не на линиях, образующих парк, а на отношении с типом мультиполигон. Чтобы понять, что такое мультиполигоны 1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_-_%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BD 2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B_%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2
Hernan (2017-03-30 14:01:16+00:00): Yolanda, los comercios que borraste fue que no estan mas o por error? Los restaure, pero sino existen mas, volve a borrarlos.
Saludos
Richard (2017-05-21 16:30:21+00:00): Hi - if you reclassify roads to highway=residential, could you please make sure you delete the tiger:reviewed=no tag at the same time? Otherwise it looks like the road is unreviewed from the original TIGER import and cannot be relied upon to be a drivable/cyclable road. Thank you.
geohacker (2017-03-30 03:57:27+00:00): Hey Daira Orozco, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you are having a great time editing the map. 

You have added ways with just area=yes tag. This is not a meaningful feature. May be you wanted to trace the buildings? Then you should use building=yes without area=yes. If you meant to tag something else, take a look at our wiki wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features

Thank you, and welcome to OSM!
Alan (2017-03-30 02:39:31+00:00): Hi there, is this a park or is it just a vacant lot? It's hard to tell from the imagery.

Can you verify the name of this park by visiting it on-the-ground?

Also, this triangular shape doesn't quite match the shape of the grassy area as seen in the Bing imagery. I think it needs a bit of tweaking.
nevw (2017-03-30 11:46:12+00:00): Landuse=forest is generally used for treed areas that are used for forestry operations.
A better way to tag this would be to use natural=wood or landcover=trees
Spanholz (2017-03-30 13:43:45+00:00): We only map existing things at OSM. Please reconsider what you have added...
Supaplex (2017-04-06 19:23:51+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
tosky (2017-12-24 18:57:04+00:00): Non c'è motivo per usare official_name al posto di name, a meno di non mappare per il rendering, che è totalmente sbagliato. Ripristinerò il tag name.

There is no reason to use official_name in place of name, unless you are mapping with the rendering in mind, which is incorrect. I will restore the name tag.
tbrownbc (2017-04-15 20:10:32+00:00): Removing track names is IMHO ... "not cool". I'm not going to waste my time adding tracks and documenting stuff if someone is just going to remove my edits.  Never mind that it's way harder to figure out what you're looking at with no track names. I run systems and understand data cleaning. I've got no problem with someone pulling a blank/empty tag... but "J40 ?" is WAY better than no tag.
mavl (2019-01-19 16:44:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-19 16:44:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-19 16:44:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mbethke (2017-03-30 05:49:03+00:00): Sorry to say but there are no supermarkets in the middle of the Mekong sand bank
eakane (2017-03-30 04:42:14+00:00): Nice
Spanholz (2017-03-30 13:29:38+00:00): Please have a look on the spelling. And you do not need a node with a park-tagging on an area with park tagging.

Have fun mapping!
cameronstrong (2017-03-31 02:48:49+00:00): i meant the node to mark the church's sign. im still getting used to the mapping thing and trying to be as accurate as possible.
Spanholz (2017-03-30 14:00:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

don't forget to map crossings with Footways. I added this footway so routing will be possible on the footways you added. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483603108#map=19/38.97485/-104.74618

Have fun mapping!
MrPete (2017-03-31 02:59:38+00:00): Thanks! I was wondering about that. All the crosswalks here generally just had the street nodes marked but no actual crossings. I've fixed most... and will do a sight-survey to see what else is needed. (Helps that I live here ;) )
Spanholz (2017-03-31 08:29:05+00:00): You don't need to map every sidewalk. Here in Germany in residential areas sidewalks are not mapped because residential roads imply sidewalks. The points were also there for car routing. "Attention crosswalk ahead" or something like that 

There is a new app called StreetComplete for Android, which can help you mapping outside :)
MrPete (2017-03-31 19:36:27+00:00): It's tricky in this neighborhood. Some areas have normal sidewalks. Some have wide curving paths -- at least twice the width of a sidewalk...

I'll take a look at StreetComplete and see how it treats this stuff.

The issue I'm trying to solve: many apps seem to ignore the walkability or bike-ability of an area that doesn't have explicit ways to walk or ride :(
Spanholz (2017-03-30 13:31:53+00:00): City limits are display through borders not with a node. What do you wanted to show here?
cameronstrong (2017-03-31 14:01:57+00:00): i meant to show the city limit sign
Spanholz (2017-03-31 14:08:05+00:00): Have a look in the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign

Most of the stuff we map is expressed through tags so machines (software code) can understand it. If you are not sure how to tag something look in the wiki or to the Netherlands/Germany where OSM is a bit more popular and better mapped .

Have a nice weekend :)
Spanholz (2017-03-30 13:46:11+00:00): Thanks for cleaning up the waterways in your area!

Have fun mapping!
Hjart (2017-03-30 08:10:01+00:00): I see these as being practically one building, and have in the past joined many.
Zartbitter (2017-03-30 08:13:55+00:00): If this is your opinion I will respect it even if I see it as two adjacent buildings.
Hjart (2017-03-30 08:28:08+00:00): I see the 2 apartments as being separated by inner walls only.
Hjart (2017-03-30 08:31:52+00:00): These terraces are built as 1 building and are never torn down separately
Zartbitter (2017-03-30 09:26:40+00:00): Ok.
mavl (2017-03-30 17:32:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавили для здания название "АЗС", но саму АЗС не обозначили. Эта АЗС действительно существует?
mavl (2017-03-30 17:35:59+00:00): В этом пакете правок вы сами её недавно удалили:  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47255270
IvanMurza (2017-03-31 09:45:56+00:00): Заправка не ГАзпромНефть, а обычная поселковая развалюха
mavl (2017-03-31 14:24:08+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. Если заправка существует, то непонятно, зачем вы её удалили. Нужно было просто убрать с неё название и другие теги. То, что вы дали название "АЗС" зданию, не делает это здание заправкой. Для заправки обязательно нужен тег amenity=fuel.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity=fuel?uselang=ru  
  
Я восстановил заправку, которую вы удалили, и убрал с неё теги. Название "АЗС" со здания удалил: это не название.
IvanMurza (2017-04-03 11:13:04+00:00): Спасибо! Я чайник... дальше постараюсь быть повнимательнее
mavl (2017-04-03 11:16:54+00:00): Не стоит благодарности. Мы тут все «чайники».
Hjart (2017-03-30 07:59:14+00:00): Hej
Tak for dine bidrag til vores projekt. Bemærk dog at jeg har tilladt mig at rette en del på det du har lavet her.
M-Rasmussen_DK (2017-03-30 08:55:57+00:00): hej
det er helt okay at rette på den men hvorfor pokker har du slettet den?? jeg ved stien går ud til hovedvejen
Hjart (2017-03-30 08:56:50+00:00): Hvilken ende?
Hjart (2017-03-30 08:59:14+00:00): Hvis du mener https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483613308, så har jeg forbundet den til Assensvej, hvilket ikke helt lykkedes for dig.
M-Rasmussen_DK (2017-03-30 09:10:07+00:00): sorry, men når jeg kigger her ser det forkert ud, altså stien slutter midtvejs. hvis jeg ser kortet i viewranger  kan jeg se lidt mere alt efter zoom .... ;o/ jeg har måske bare været lidt hurtig ;o)
Hjart (2017-03-30 09:12:57+00:00): Hvis du åbner editoren og ser på data der, vil du kunne se at det er i orden.
Den grafiske repræsentation, som ses direkte på vores hjemmeside er desværre endnu ikke helt opdateret.
Hjart (2017-03-30 09:13:57+00:00): Ok, det vil sige, det er den nu (på min skærm ihvertfald) :-)
M-Rasmussen_DK (2017-03-30 09:42:37+00:00): Jeps, jeg kiggede jo bare her men det ser okay ud på kortet ;o) jeg lærer det jo nok engang .... ;o/
Hjart (2017-03-30 10:02:10+00:00): Rigtig mange begyndere bliver forvirrede over det, så alt forladt :-)
Chrysopras (2017-03-30 06:53:01+00:00): Sorry, das „Prevorst“ im Änderungssatzkommentar ist natürlich Unsinn und ein Tippfehler.
alphensebezorger (2017-03-30 18:24:21+00:00): Hallo HourOfThe Wulf.
Je hebt geen winkel toegevoegd, alleen een naam, operator en website. Die zullen wel bij de winkel horen, maar als de winkel ontbreekt, hebben zulke secondaire tags weinig zin. Op zijn minst shop=yes toevoegen lijkt me zinnig, liefst natuurlijk iets specifiekers (shop=supermarket, shop=clothes o.i.d). Als je het adres weet kan alle informatie beter samengevoegd worden op het aanwezige adrespunt.
"Source=Info." is zo nietszeggend dat je het net zo goed weg kan laten.
srividya_c (2017-03-31 06:59:04+00:00): Hi baldovinoi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Looks like you are adding buildings in this area, but the way you have traced buildings are not correct. Buildings should be traced as polygons(square) and not line in the middle. 

Here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPJz-AucqF4) is the video on how to add buildings. Please let me know if you have any question.

As these buildings were not well traced I have reverted your changes. 

Happy Mapping.
eggie (2017-03-30 07:56:11+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”
Alleen een naam zal niets doen op een adresnode. Welicht office=company erbij?

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
demon_box (2017-04-01 19:59:29+00:00): ciao, soltanto il tag name non significa nulla o quasi perchè non si capisce di cosa si tratta... negozio, associazione, gelateria?
se si tratta di una associazione devi aggiungere office=association
grazie
joost schouppe (2019-02-13 14:52:15+00:00): I think I did this road on a motorbike (long time ago). It was hard but not extreme. Maybe the road should get a motorcycle=yes tag?
Denis Venidiktov (2019-02-14 09:08:57+00:00): yes, i`ve been travelled this road on motorcycle. i think we can add this tag. in good weather there is no problem, but if it`s raining it could be difficult.
seav (2017-03-30 13:47:18+00:00): Did you combine the two separate parts of Polaris together into 1 way? If yes, then you broke the Bel-Air and Poblacion barangay boundary relations.
Plutocrat (2017-03-31 03:05:45+00:00): Ah, yes, I did that, trying to fix the original problem (part of Polaris and Orion not showing). The ID editor didn't complain. 
Thanks for catching it.
Plutocrat (2017-03-31 03:16:03+00:00): There were some other issues too. Parts of Polaris were marked as generic road, rather than residential, so I was trying to fix those too by joining them together.
seav (2017-03-31 03:43:50+00:00): 👍
Supaplex (2017-03-30 08:48:26+00:00): 你加的資料跑到歐洲了
Supaplex (2017-04-07 14:49:36+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2017-03-30 17:55:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dembassy and add the country of the embassy.
scai (2017-03-30 16:24:18+00:00): name="Kilometrierung 57" ist hier sicherlich nicht das richtige Tag für.
scai (2017-03-30 16:31:12+00:00): Bitte die Tags verwenden wie bei dieser Kilometermarkierung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2312928055

Und den Namen entfernen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
joost schouppe (2018-01-24 18:02:31+00:00): Dit schuurtje, way 483630334 , is niet zichtbaar op luchtfoto noch GRB. Zou het ondertussen verwijderd kunnen zijn?
Jakka (2018-01-24 18:16:00+00:00): Er af gehaald. thx
DaveF (2017-03-30 10:31:11+00:00): Hi
I presume the car park has been rebuilt to accommodate?
Hilton Hotels (2017-03-31 11:43:22+00:00): Hello,

Please confirm the location of the newly built hotel at the airport with the website
http://hamptoninn3.hilton.com/en/hotels/united-kingdom/hampton-by-hilton-bristol-airport-BRSHXHX/maps-directions/index.html
DaveF (2017-03-31 11:56:15+00:00): Hi
I'm sure the hotel is in the correct position, but it's clashing with the existing car park. This also requires updating.
Hilton Hotels (2017-03-31 13:17:25+00:00): Hello Dave,

I will gladly make further edits, but before that could you please share more guides on what exactly should be done, to make sure we are on the same page?

Thank you.
Omegatherion (2017-04-03 06:47:18+00:00): Bitte das Landuse=residential reparieren
Omegatherion (2017-04-04 09:06:40+00:00): ups, MP übersehen
fatuus (2017-03-30 14:39:47+00:00): Kul att du registrerar Vasa-sträckan.

Hur resonerar du kring de delar av spåret där Vasaloppets naturreservat inte går där loppen egentligen går. Om man tittar på överlägget med GPS-spåren t.ex här: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/251991208
Så ligger de strax norr om sträcka i OSM.
Naturreservat lirar inte med den egentliga sträckningen....
AndersAndersson (2017-03-31 23:58:40+00:00): Hej!
Jag har tänkt på samma sak förut, och nu när jag åkt delar av sträckan så verkar det som att det på många ställen är omdraget för att förhindra problem med vatten de år då det är varmt när loppet körs.
Jag har ingen aning om ifall länsstyrelsen ändrat naturreservatet utifrån detta. Importen av naturreservat i OSM gjordes för 7 år sedan.
Jag tycker nog att spåret egentligen borde dras ungefär där det går i verkligheten, även om det är utanför reservatets gränser. Troligen så varierar nog den exakta sträckningen lite från år till år beroende på tillfrysning av myrar m.m.
fatuus (2017-04-04 05:41:18+00:00): Jag försökte hitta något beslut om ändring av naturreservatet. Men det verkar vara samma sträckning sedan bildandet 1993. 
Jag tycker också att stigen och spåret skall dras om där det faktiskt går.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-02 09:42:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4763778379/history has name = Noname that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
That is probably object without name, not object named "Noname". I think that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes would work better here, should it be changed?
scai (2017-04-03 16:29:23+00:00): Wurde diese Brücke wirklich abgerissen? Erfolgt ein Neubau?
jannikvomlande (2017-04-06 03:49:42+00:00): Ja, Neubau kommt aufgrund der Verbreiterung der A 7.
scai (2017-04-06 07:27:10+00:00): Alles klar. Ich habe noexit=yes an den Enden ergänzt um die QA-Werkzeuge zu besänftigen.
jannikvomlande (2017-04-06 19:42:56+00:00): Super, vielen Dank. Ich bin dem Programm noch nicht so bewandert.
scai (2017-04-07 06:54:03+00:00): Achso, dann vielleicht ein paar Worte dazu. Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance finden sich eine Reihe an Werkzeugen zur Qualitätssicherung. Nützlich (für mich) sind da vor allem der OSM Inspector, KeepRight und Osmose. Beim OSM Inspector (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/) sieht man nach Wechsel auf den Routing-View beispielsweise unverbundene Wege, dadurch ist mir diese Stelle hier aufgefallen. Ein noexit=yes am Ende bedeutet sozusagen "hier geht es wirklich nicht weiter, ist kein Fehler".
streckenkundler (2017-04-07 08:18:27+00:00): Ich würde aber bei solchen Brückenneubauten niemals die Brücke löschen, sondern die highway=coonstruction-Tags verwenden, verbunden mit einem access=no. Hintergrund ist, daß das Stress und Arbeit mit evt. Routen-Relationen, die über diese Brücke verlaufen, vermeidet..

Sven
scai (2017-04-07 08:25:46+00:00): Und die History bleibt erhalten. Fände ich auch besser.
jannikvomlande (2017-04-12 05:11:49+00:00): moin moin, ich bin gerne lernfähig und nehme dankbar alle Kommentare an. Gelernt - niemals Brücke löschen!  Bin nicht zuhause und kann das hier auf dem kleinen Display bearbeiten. Kann ich die Löschung rückgängig machen? DANKE
scai (2017-04-12 19:46:17+00:00): Bearbeitungen rückgängig machen geht, ist aber nicht trivial. Genau genommen wird dabei nichts rückgängig gemacht sondern eine neue Version mit dem alten (=vorherigen) Eigenschaften erzeugt. Dafür gibt es in JOSM beispielsweise ein Plugin, es gibt auch eigenständige Scripte die das können. Sollte jedenfalls nur jemand tun der sich damit auskennt.
scai (2017-04-12 19:50:18+00:00): Ich habe diese Änderung und auch changeset 47285931 rückgängig gemacht und die Tags abgeändert (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47706803).

Beispiel: statt highway=secondary ist hier nun highway=construction und construction=secondary dran.
Alexander-II (2017-03-30 11:29:05+00:00): В покемон го небось играете? Все ваши правки отменены.
eggie (2017-03-30 18:10:31+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-30 18:12:18+00:00): Je kunt in iD de kadaster pdok 2016 op de achtergrond zetten. De URL is http://whoots.mapwarper.net/tms/{zoom}/{x}/{y}/Actueel_ortho25/http://geodata.nationaalgeoregister.nl/luchtfoto/wms?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=Actueel_ortho25&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}
eggie (2017-03-30 18:23:10+00:00): Linker vijver aangepast aan kadaster pdok 2016. Klopte wel aardig.
In het begin volgen wij startende mappers.. ook om te helpen.
Alexander-II (2017-03-30 11:34:04+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap. Промазали наверное? Вы установили для ресторана в доме номер 30 номер дома "28 к1". Я исправляю обратно.
EivindWAA (2017-04-18 21:35:16+00:00): Hi Jones, if island/islets are taged whit source Kartverket, and username has _import please do not aligned the island/islet by bing maps, as the island probably are imported from official data deliverd from map authorities here in Norway. bing has many miss aligned images here :( have a look here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps#Precision

and if you want to help improve the map in norway please read the wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway

and

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/N50_import_(Norway)

regards
Eivind
EivindWAA (2017-03-30 15:12:17+00:00): Hi Jones, if island/islets are taged whit source Kartverket, and username has _import  please do not aligned the island/islet by bing maps, as the island probably are imported from official data deliverd from map authorities here in Norway. bing has many miss aligned images here :( have a look here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps#Precision

and if you want to help improve the map in norway please read the wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway

and

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/N50_import_(Norway)


regards
Eivind
eggie (2017-03-30 19:33:01+00:00): ... ja.. goeie actie.. da's maar goed dat je die weghaalt. Al je  edits komen immers in het echt op de kaart en wel direct. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47286477
eggie (2017-03-30 19:34:48+00:00): In het begin volgen we startende mapper.. ook om te helpen... vandaar.. 
Kijk zeker ook op het forum van OSM. je kunt je voorstellen onder het draadje Welkom.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
mavl (2019-01-19 16:44:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Alecs01 (2017-04-01 16:16:29+00:00): Hi again, this restaurant is in the middle of a street http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4763824021 can you indicate the right position?
Markus366 (2017-07-04 21:47:46+00:00): Hallo, 

der Name des Rad-Weges ist bereits in der Relation eingetragen. Bitte den name tag aus dem way daher wieder entfernen.

Markus
user_5359 (2017-03-30 17:56:58+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359