piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2017-08-10 15:45:59+00:00): Why are you using Catastro Spain etc as source?
Hjart (2017-08-10 15:47:29+00:00): Also note that i moved the Netto name & shop=supermarket tags onto the building not long ago.
taxi301 (2017-08-14 11:15:33+00:00): Mistake, sorry I'm. watching the data on SDFE. I would like to use the WMS sleepers "services.kortforsyningen.dk:BU.Building" but it pops up an error. Will you help ?
Regards
taxi301 (2017-08-14 11:25:58+00:00): Is it possible to access WMS sleepers from this site?
https://sdfekort.dk/spatialmap
taxi301 (2017-08-14 12:01:31+00:00): After typing this address http://kortforsyningen.kms.dk/topo_skaermkort?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities 
 i have tiled but not all, most of the error.
Best regards and thank you in advance for your help
Hjart (2017-08-15 22:46:15+00:00): I never actually used those, but as far as I'm aware a login is needed.
taxi301 (2017-08-16 08:12:49+00:00): Thank you
Hjart (2017-08-16 19:54:35+00:00): Also note that if you are considering any imports, you will need to read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import first
Frans S (2018-09-28 17:34:47+00:00): Hi, after reviewing this task I noticed that you often forgot to square your mapped buildings. Please square each rectangular building with the S key in ID editor
Thanks
Martin Borsje (2017-11-18 11:48:38+00:00): Heb wat overbodige tagging verwijderd
Martin
Martin Borsje (2017-11-18 11:44:58+00:00): heb foot=designated van highway=footway/pedestrian afgehaald. Dit ligt reeds in footway/pedestrian. Evenzo bicycle=no.
geri-oc (2018-02-08 09:43:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/261219

geodienste.sachsen.de:	wms_endpoint:https://geodienste.sachsen.de/wms_geosn_webatlas-sn/guest?
literan (2017-08-11 09:45:19+00:00): пожалуйста, не надо расставлять замки в Москве. Если в мапс.ми нельзя добавить дома, пользуйтесь другими редакторами. К тому же вы некорректно проставляете адреску - перед "с" нужен пробел
corfede (2017-08-11 06:59:22+00:00): Ciao, i tag leisure, office e shop sono primari e non c'entrano con amenity, quindi non si aggiunge amenity=shop, amenity=office o amenity=leisure. Non so se segui la lista talk-it per approfondire, altrimenti puoi aggiungerti anche al gruppo telegram al link https://t.me/joinchat/ArdLjEMBjaQAyUfpVgDkag. Ciao, Federico.
luiswoo (2017-08-10 19:17:18+00:00): XRRA это не local_ref а код ICAO
icao=XRRA
https://russianplanes.net/city/Azov
Jan Olieslagers (2017-08-11 04:23:37+00:00): Sorry I do not agree. ICAO codes for the former Soviet Union begin with U. You can refer to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_airports_by_ICAO_code:_U andd to many other references. Codes not Uxxx in Russia/CIS  are non-ICAO. I discussed this with map.aopa.ru before changing! Regards,
luiswoo (2017-08-11 15:04:28+00:00): Если XRRA не код ICAO, то я не знаю, что это за обозначение. Внутрироссийская  система кодирования использует кириллицу («ЬРРА» в данном случае).
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0_%D0%98%D0%90%D0%A2%D0%90#.D0.92.D0.BD.D1.83.D1.82.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8F.D1.8F_.D1.81.D0.B8.D1.81.D1.82.D0.B5.D0.BC.D0.B0_.D0.BA.D0.BE.D0.B4.D0.B8.D1.80.D0.BE.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B1.D1.8B.D0.B2.D1.88.D0.B5.D0.B3.D0.BE_.D0.A1.D0.A1.D0.A1.D0.A0
(не знаю, где есть описание этой системы на английском, извините.)
Jan Olieslagers (2017-08-11 15:27:43+00:00): Dear,
Thasnk you very much for discussing politely. Please send me e-mail, to karlchen9@skynet.be, and I will reply more extensively. Also I can then get help from a Russian person, I have been talking to him quite much and he will surely be able to explain better than I can.
Kind regards from Belgium,
Karel ADAMS
(and my apologies for not writing in your languate - I am told it is beautiful but hard to learn because there are many rules and many exceptions to all those rules :) )
geri-oc (2017-08-11 14:45:21+00:00): Du trägst shelter teilweise doppelt ein. Shelter sind tw. an pt=platform oder separat eingetragen, was durchaus richtig ist. Der Steig 3 hat keine.
flunk (2017-08-11 17:27:57+00:00): ich benutze streetcomplete zum eintragen. wie die daten dann an den punkten laden, darauf hat man keinen einfluss.
emergency99 (2017-08-10 18:26:48+00:00): Wenn die geschäfte nur leer sind dann würde ich soe mit shop=vacant taggen.
evod (2017-08-11 11:25:51+00:00): stimmt, mach ich nächstes mal
oormilavinod (2017-08-17 05:09:50+00:00): hey axfm, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-08-17 05:08:42+00:00): hey JesusGerman97 welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
John-O (2017-09-03 21:13:55+00:00): The mountain rescue box is NOT a shop. It is a supply of equipment used by mountain rescue teams in an emergency. A member of the public cannot buy equipment here. 

The mountain rescue box has already been added to the map:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396197926
John-O (2017-09-08 13:25:42+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51845400
aaronsta (2018-01-04 13:37:11+00:00): Thank you CherryBombbb for your edit.
Note however, please do not intentionally or unintentionally disconnect or remove roads. Several roads in this and other edits made by yourself either disconnected or removed nodes so that roads were no longer connected. It is not beneficial to the OSM mapping community if you do these kind of edits. Cheers,
Aaron
oormilavinod (2017-08-14 11:45:10+00:00): hey  Mario Lokote69, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-08-14 11:35:37+00:00): hey  Alexis Danyel, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-08-14 11:34:46+00:00): hey CÉSAR FF, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-08-17 05:05:56+00:00): hey cesar dv, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:46:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-26 10:20:01+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1405739 ?
alphensebezorger (2017-08-10 22:22:43+00:00): Hallo mapmakerwbd,

Bedankt voor je verbetering van  de openingstijden. Kun je in het vervolg zoveel mogelijk aansluiten bij de 'tagging' zoals in de wiki (wiki.openstreetmap.org) beschreven staat. Dan is het duidelijk wat er bedoeld wordt. De tags zijn altijd in het engels.

In dit geval staat op http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours beschreven dat 'gesloten' wordt getagged als 'off' of 'closed'. Bovendien mist er voor Su nog een puntkomma.

Menselijke lezers zullen wel begrijpen wat je bedoelt, maar apps (zoals OsmAnd) die de gegevens van OSM gebruiken, kunnen er anders niets mee.

Groet, Alphensebezorger.
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 11:18:53+00:00): hey  sampedreño, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 10:44:48+00:00): hey eshwor_Sapkota, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 10:43:33+00:00): hey Rodea,  welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 10:42:30+00:00): hey Elite386 welcome to osm, i appreciate your interest in mapping, but i noticed that you have a marks a  closed way as a park where as it looks more like a residential area. iam reverting this changeset . have a nice day
Parzelle13 (2018-05-08 09:54:49+00:00): Hallo, kann dieser Fehlerhinweis denn jetzt als erledigt betrachtet werden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/490443
Luya Tshimbalanga (2017-08-10 17:57:31+00:00): Rename Microsoft Vancouver
GinaroZ (2017-08-11 14:33:12+00:00): Looks like you've added a duplicate footway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514571519 - I assume the cyclepath is shared use?
Pawcio (2017-08-11 17:36:59+00:00): No, it is segrageted
GinaroZ (2017-08-11 20:13:14+00:00): Segregated with a white line down the middle (if so should be one path and segregated=yes) or actually two separate paths?
Pawcio (2017-08-12 10:33:09+00:00): One side black the other red. I checked the Wiki and I've corrected it
Endres Pelka (2017-08-17 00:45:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:opening_hours
gurglypipe (2017-08-10 18:26:16+00:00): This includes reworking the junction with Brantfell Road and St. Martin’s Hill to make it a cross-roads, since there seems to be no restriction on coasting down Brantfell Road and onto St. Martin’s Hill in real life.
lakedistrict (2017-08-10 20:54:21+00:00): Yes, Brantfell Rd and St. Martins Hill is a crossroads, the rest of the edits look good too :)
AsgerFrank (2017-08-17 18:58:42+00:00): Modtager du (jeg) egentlig denne kommentar til fx en bænk du har mappet med maps.me?
AsgerFrank (2017-08-17 19:12:24+00:00): Nej, der kommer intet til den min normale mailadresse, som når jeg bruger andre editorer, eller i osm-profilens meddelelser.
Kun hvis jeg går ind på min sædvanlige osmbruger-profil under redigeringer, er der diskret markeret at der er en kommentar.
Så der det måske derfor maps.me-brugere ofte ikke responderer på kommentarer.
highflyer74 (2017-08-11 15:32:34+00:00): Moin JumJoe und herzlich willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte denke beim Verschieben von Objekten immer daran, daß es auch sein kann, daß das Luftbild, welches Du im Hintergrund siehst, nicht richtig ausgerichtet sein kann. Man sollte dies deshalb immer per in OSM vorhandenen GPS Tracks mitteln. So kommt man der tatsächlichen Lage näher. Wenn man sich nicht sicher ist, sollte man das Verschieben von mehreren Objekten vermeiden. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database#Imagery_Offsets).

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Auch möchte ich Dich zu unserem monatlichen OSM Treffen in Bremen einladen. Informationen dazu gibt es hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Veranstaltungen

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
cadsauxk (2018-10-13 14:41:42+00:00): Olá Jeverson Ricardo, por favor esclareça qual a função da área inserida com nome de "2 - Boa Vista"
Piskvor (2017-08-11 20:21:47+00:00): "PO -PA 8.30 - 18.00" je otviraci doba autodilny?
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-08-11 09:21:17+00:00): Hello... I may have been a tad heavy on the road classification but you went all the way in the other direction and removed any notion of highway hierarchy in the whole area. I strongly dissent: at least the ways that are dual-carriageways with central reservation must be distinguished from the surrounding ways - they should be at least tertiary. It may look odd compared to the old town nearby to the east, but this new development has a structure that we must reflect into the map.
MintCondition (2017-08-14 23:31:02+00:00): Okay, that all sounds reasonable. I'll revert my changes. Thanks for adding to the map!
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-08-16 09:15:43+00:00): On the other hand, I agree that these ways stick out like a sore thumb compared to their surroundings. Maybe only the dual carriageways should be promoted. I hope that more recent imagery will help make better sense of the road network - I have yet to identify the main links from Tivaoune Peul to the main road to the south. I would like to say I'll ask locals but few of them venture to these far-flung suburbs of Dakar.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-08-16 09:48:19+00:00): So, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51165151 walked back some of my overenthusiastic highway=tertiary tagging in that new development - only keeping the structural links between the large roundabouts. The others I had tagged as highway=tertiary may be more important than the average highway=residential but highway=tertiary unbalanced the network.
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 06:32:33+00:00): hey Brian Jared welcome to OSM, i appreciate your interest in mapping, i have noticed that you have added a park feature. i do not see it in any of the imageries. could you please confirm the source? have nice day
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 06:24:55+00:00): hey Brian Jared, welcome to OSM, i appreciate your interest in mapping, but i have noticed that you have added a park ,this is not available in any of the imageries.  could you please specify the source. have a nice day
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 06:17:02+00:00): hey Rosario garcía welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
danvyr (2017-12-23 15:37:21+00:00): Велодрожка, если она там есть (по спутниковым снимкам не видно), должна быть соединена с пешеходными дорожками и дорогами. 
Так же не должно быть наслоений дорог. 
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=15&lat=52.08228&lon=23.76018&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C50%2C191%2C195%2C196%2C370&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
4b696d (2017-08-11 15:21:16+00:00): Hi, why do you keep tagging parking_positions as taxiways?
Ori952 (2017-08-11 18:23:22+00:00): Because otherwise it doesn't show, so what's the point?
Ori952 (2017-08-11 18:25:01+00:00): I mapped the whole airport at the first place and it remained so for a long time. Doesn't disturb anyone
4b696d (2017-08-11 19:06:49+00:00): Tagging for the renderer is commonly disliked in OSM. This means that you should not use tags to make things show up on a specific map. If you want a certain thing to show up on a map then you need to create your own map with your own renderer. Just because nobody did notice before does not make it right. There is a tag for parking positions so there is no need to use a wrong one.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Ori952 (2017-08-11 20:09:30+00:00): What is the point in tagging something that doesn't show at all? In the page you sent me to it says: "...to make things show up in a specific way on the map rendering". This is not the case. I don't want it to show up in just a certain way, I need it to show up. At all. So given that,  parking positions are not that different from taxiways. It is more of a specification.      

And I do actually use it for wikipedia: https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%A0%D7%9E%D7%9C_%D7%94%D7%AA%D7%A2%D7%95%D7%A4%D7%94_%D7%91%D7%9F-%D7%92%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%99%D7%95%D7%9F
4b696d (2017-08-12 20:06:27+00:00): OSM is a database, not a map. You can render a map from this database and that is what Mapnik does. There are a ton of things that are not rendered by Mapnik at all. But those might be rendered by others. Just because Mapnik does not render parking_positions you should not tag them incorrectly to show up in Mapnik.
Just continue reading the site I showed you: "Don't deliberately enter data incorrectly for the renderer." This is what you are doing.
pitscheplatsch (2017-08-12 07:04:00+00:00): Hi PerthCountyMaps, welcome to OSM. Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same streets? This deletes the history. 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51011966
fkv (2019-12-01 21:39:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77791864 where the changeset comment is: revert 51011985
Wanderwütiger (2019-12-02 21:46:18+00:00): Hi fkv! I am okay with removing natural=peak from the "Große Kanzel" as it is not really the highest point of the area. However, I believe that the board "Selbstlose Retter" should start with a capital letter because this is a typical naming convention as far as I know. What would you recommend?
Greetings from Carinthia, Wanderwütiger ;-)
fkv (2019-12-03 01:53:51+00:00): Wir können deutsch reden. ;-)
Ob man "selbstlose Retter" klein oder groß schreibt, ist Geschmackssache. Adjektive schreibt man klein, außer in Eigennamen, und das ist kein Eigenname. Auf der Tafel ist es als Überschrift groß geschrieben, aber in OSM ist es keine Überschrift, sondern nur der Name... Aber man kann es auch in OSM als Titel ansehen und daher groß schreiben. Also Ansichtssache. In so einem Fall gehört es sich nicht, etwas nach eigenem Geschmack umzutaggen, was wer anderer (in diesem Fall ich) schon mit Bedacht gemappt hat. Zumindest solltest du den Mapper vorher fragen.
Mir ist der Anfangsbuchstabe nicht so wichtig. Der Anlass, warum ich den Changeset revertiert habe, ist, dass die andere Änderung ganz klar falsch ist. Du hast ja schon selber bemerkt, dass die Große Kanzel kein Gipfel ist. Von der Eicherthütte kommend geht man zum Wildenauerkreuz stetig bergab! Es ist kein Gipfelkreuz, sondern ein Gedenkkreuz. Was hat dich geritten, dort einen Gipfel zu taggen?
Wanderwütiger (2019-12-07 15:24:43+00:00): Tut mir leid, dass ich erst jetzt dazu komme, zurückzuschreiben. Der Grund, warum ich die "Große Kanzel" damals als Gipfel verzeichnet habe ist für mich auch nicht mehr wirklich nachvollziehbar. Ich schätze, ich habe mir damals gedacht, sie ist durch ein "Gipfelkreuz" markiert, also sollte sie auch ein Gipfel sein. Ich habe sie also damals einfach impulsiv getaggt, ohne zu beachten, dass das hier eigentlich nur ein Gedenkkreuz ist. Es tut mir natürlich leid, aus Versehen hier in die Karte gepfuscht zu haben, normalerweise bin ich beim Taggen sorgfältiger.
Bezüglich der "selbstlose Retter"-Tafel, würde ich trotzdem vorschlagen, den Namen mit einem Großbuchstaben zu beginnen. So viel ich weiß, beginnen die Namen von Objekten in Karten immer mit Großbuchstaben, da sie eben Titel für das jeweilige Objekt sind. "große Kanzel" oder "rosa Höhlchen" wären eher selten anzutreffen 😉.
Liebe Grüße, Wanderwütiger
Wanderwütiger (2019-12-07 15:32:59+00:00): Im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#Hinweise), findet sich im Abschnitt Hinweise eine Empfehlung bezüglich der Verwendung von Groß- und Kleinbuchstaben ("Verwende gemischte Groß- und Kleinschreibung, mit Großschreibung für den ersten Buchstaben eines Wortes.").
fkv (2019-12-09 04:40:27+00:00): "Große Kanzel" und "Rosa Höhlchen" sind Eigennamen, während "selbstlose Retter" nur die Überschrift auf der Tafel ist und genausogut "unsere Bergretter" draufstehen könnte. Eine Großschreibung wäre hier irreführend, weil der Eindruck entstünde, es gehe um eine Organisation namens Selbstlose Retter.
Man könnte argumentieren, dass "selbstlose Retter" gar nicht ins name-Tag gehört, weil es eigentlich kein Name ist. Aber passendere Tags gibt es nicht, z.B. in description=* ist nicht für Titel gedacht, sondern für Erklärungen; und title=* ist nicht in Gebrauch.

Das Wiki-Zitat ist übrigens grob verallgemeinernd, denn erstens steht extra dabei, dass es nur eine aus der englischen Wiki-Seite stammende Empfehlung ist, und dort wiederum steht, dass die Regel nicht für alle Sprachen gilt. Zweitens stimmt die Regel nicht mal für Englisch, denn in Überschriften schreibt man Wörter wie "the", "a", "of", "in", "to" usw. ab dem zweiten Wort immer klein. Die Regeln für englischsprachige Überschriften bereiten sogar Muttersprachlern Schwierigkeiten.
Wanderwütiger (2019-12-15 10:39:47+00:00): Noch einmal Entschuldigung für die späte Antwort, die Woche war für mich ziemlich arbeitsam. 
Ich bin es gewohnt sämtliche Namen auf Karten mit großem Anfangsbuchstaben zu sehen, auch in den OSM-Kartendaten bin ich bis jetzt keinen Ausnahmen begegnet. Ich habe den name-Tag immer als Titel des jeweiligen Objekts angesehen. Du hast natürlich recht, dass eine Großschreibung eventuell falsche Eindrücke vermitteln kann. Ich bin der Meinung, dass solche Entscheidungen im Zweifelsfall dem "Local Expert" überlassen werden sollten und du bist hier sicher um einiges versierter als ich. Vielen Dank für die Erklärung und die schnellen Antworten!
Liebe Grüße, Wanderwütiger
jaap de vries (2017-12-18 12:29:20+00:00): Je hebt maar liefst 4 x deze naam "ZZG Herstelcentrum " toegevoegd. 1x plaatsen is meer dan voldoende. Ik pas eea even aan, ook ga ik even bij je andere bijwerking kijken of er fouten aanwezig zijn.
oormilavinod (2017-08-17 06:11:57+00:00): hey rd112ra,  welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a water body . but it does not appear on any of the images, could you please specify the source.. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-08-15 20:30:05+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
user_6110846 (2017-09-27 07:57:42+00:00): Що ви робите ? навіщо ви видаляєте старі назви ?Старі назви переносяться  у old_name:uk old_name en old_name ru
user_6110846 (2017-09-27 16:20:58+00:00): поясніть , що стало підставою для перейменування . На сайті військової адміністрації я не знайшов інформації пр перейменування даної вулиць як і решти Вами перейменованих. Поділіться джерелом інформації з спільнотою даног о проекту будь-ласка.
Øukasz (2017-08-17 19:39:12+00:00): Hello,

why remove name:en from Zakho?
ڕاستی (2017-08-18 23:26:32+00:00): the official name is زاخۆ, in the other countries name of city, town and village are set by local language.
Øukasz (2017-08-20 10:42:18+00:00): OK rasti, i can see you still do not understand the tagging system in OSM or perhaps choose not to accept it.

to reiterate for the last time: main name tag should be in local language. language specific name tags should be used to express the name in other languages. 

you are persistently deleting tags in names other than kurdish and refuse to accept that other people who speak other languages and use OSM for purposes others than your own are out there.

what you are doing is vandalism:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism

i am reporting your activities to the data working group and will ask for an action on their part as you have caused enough damage already.

i will also start monitoring your activities more closely from now on, so if you remove more names i will be tracking that for reverting.