piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lejun (2022-06-21 07:23:16+00:00): Vu et validé, merci de la contribution. À noter qu’il n’y a pas de consensus sur la manière de mettre l’adresse, que ce soit en point séparé du bâtiment, en point sur le bâtiment ou directement sur le bâtiment comme tu as fait. On recommande de faire comme les autres dans le coin, or il semblerait que ce soit la première option qui est privilégiée à savoir un point séparé du bâtiment, potentiellement là où est la boite aux lettres (amenity=letter_box). Pas forcément besoin de correction, mais de quoi réfléchir un peu.
WoesteHugo (2022-06-22 13:20:16+00:00): Hi Wetterhorn,

Ik heb deze fout ook weleens gemaakt door bij relatief korte wegwerkzaamheden de weg op 'under construction' te zetten (zie de changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1117837525). Dit is echter niet handig omdat soms mensen maar eens per jaar hun map updaten. 

Ik heb het nu teruggezet met daar bij een conditional access (zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions) tot het einde van de werkzaamheden.

Mvg,
Hugo
Wetterhorn (2022-06-22 15:37:42+00:00): Alrighty 

Relatief korte werkzaamheden is uiteraard een rekbaar begrip, in dit geval ligt de wegvak er 39 dagen uit [https://www.enschede.nl/wegwerkzaamheden-deurningerstraat-singels]
Frans S (2022-06-24 09:38:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I have the impression that you just imported the buildings with AI and did not adjust the buildings to match the object precisely.
I invalidate this task.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
tom_yorados (2022-06-20 20:43:20+00:00): Hi Sanderauer,
bitte verwende nicht das Name-Tag für die Baum-Spezies. Siehe wiki: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dtree

Auszug:
"Das Attribut sollte nicht für den botanischen Namen oder dessen landessprachliche oder umgangssprachliche Variante(n) benutzt werden."
Das Name-Tag ist generell nur für Eigennamen gedacht. Also wenn dieses spezielle Objekt einen individuellen Namen hat.

Best Grüße..
user_9648254 (2022-06-21 03:05:11+00:00): Hallo,
das habe ich dann wohl beim Lesen uebersehen. Werde ich aber nachholen.

Gruss
Sanderauer
HansWürstchen (2022-06-24 22:12:41+00:00): Hallo 551127025789, Du hast in diesem und weiteren CS´s diverse Zufahrtswege gelöscht, wenn Wege, oder Straßen nicht betreten, bzw. befahren werden dürfen werden sie nicht gelöscht, es werden die access-Attribute angepasst, das diese Wege noch existieren ist sowieso offensichtlich, und sie werden früher oder später wieder eingepflegt.
Ähnlich verhält es sich mit abgebrochenen Bahnstrecken sie werden als railway=razed, oder abandoned erfasst, dies gilt besonders wenn sie bereits entsprechend erfasst sind.
Berücksichtige dies doch bitte bei zukünftigen CS.
MfG!
Strubbl (2022-06-28 18:25:54+00:00): Bitte nicht das Tagging von hw=path wegändern in way 313985482. Das war korrekt so und nun ist es nicht mehr korrekt. Informiere dich im Wiki über das korrekte Taggen bevor du es einfach abänderst
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122633658
Strubbl (2022-06-28 18:27:17+00:00): Wieso setzt du access=no auf dem Radweg und dem Poller?
jermig (2022-09-20 19:06:53+00:00): Jakie jest źródło informacji, że droga od granic Tarnowa przez nowy most (ten oddany, a nie budowany) jest drogą wojewódzką DW973?
kstdz (2022-09-20 19:22:17+00:00): Przebieg DW973 nigdy nie został zmieniony. Zgodnie z oznakowaniem w terenie i wykazem dróg wojewódzkich będących pod zarządem ZDW  w Krakowie, DW973 przebiegała i nadal przebiega przez Kępę Bogumilowicką. Objazd był wytyczony istniejącymi drogami bez zmiany przebiegu drogi o ww. numerze.
jermig (2022-09-20 20:06:30+00:00): Według Marszałka Województwa (stan na kwiecień 2022) droga powiatowa 1346K to ul. Witosa w Tarnowie do granic miasta, potem most i do Wierzchosławic do DW975.
Prawdopodobnie w związku z budową odcinek Witosa stał się drogą wojewódzką, bo tak twierdzi ZDW Kraków.
Ale od ul. Dunajcowej do DW975 jest to droga powiatowa 1346K.
Proszę więc o usunięcie błędnego oznaczenia.
kstdz (2022-09-20 20:13:30+00:00): Przepraszam, pobieżnie czytając nie zwróciłem uwagi, że chodzi konkretnie o odcinek od granic Tarnowa. Oczywiście jest to droga powiatowa, dodałem z rozpędu numerację na całym odcinku. Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi.
lloudspeaker (2024-03-04 15:40:04+00:00): Im Wurstelprater gibt es die Tatsache, dass Radfahren lt. Hausordnung erlaubt ist, aber die Schilder geben das nicht wieder (Das Radsymbol fehlt).
Gibt es eine Möglichkeit das so einzutragen, damit nicht alle Router usw. drumherum routen obwohl man durchfahren darf?
Mashin (2022-06-21 08:58:12+00:00): Looks good. Thanks!
Becky Candy (2022-06-22 08:17:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping! Please, zoom in and out in order to clearly see if an object is a building or not. Look for a color difference between the roof and ground, shadows and regular geometric shapes (e.g. rectangles or circles).You can also use different imagery to compare for clarity.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122634905
adrianojbr (2022-06-21 03:25:27+00:00): Falta definir a religião e denominação religiosa do local de culto adicionado.
Frans S (2022-07-09 10:24:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122635090
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-06-20 20:11:17+00:00): empty changeset by mistake
vasony (2022-07-01 20:33:15+00:00): Mi volt a baj a Garadna erdészház úttal, hogy törölted a nevét?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318018010
kogutowicz-mano (2022-07-02 06:07:02+00:00): Rendkívül valószínűtlen. Inkább tűnik egy lelkes amatőr próbálkozásának. Egy kategóriába soroltam a
name=Vigyázz! Kidőlt fák nehezítik a haladást!!!
és a
name=Ebből ne igyál!
stílusú tagekkel. (Még ha "Garadna erdészházhoz vezető út" lett volna...)
kogutowicz-mano (2022-07-02 06:09:31+00:00): Szóval a "Garadna erdészház" semmiképpen sem lehet egy vonal neve. Egy pont vagy egy terület (building=yes) viselheti csak.
vasony (2022-07-02 10:53:41+00:00): ez az elmélet. a választási címjegyzékben viszont benne van. ahogy van olyan cim is hogy pl. 118/a őrház 1. persze nekem se tetszik. 
egykébként nekem nem fog hiányozni, csak az elmélet érdekelt.
az09 (2022-07-01 08:15:29+00:00): а чего не 4 отдельных? в чем смысл мультика?..
armitageone (2022-07-04 14:51:48+00:00): Потому что тут один отстойник, а не четыре. И в поиске он должен один находиться, а не четыре рядом.
JhowieNitnek (2022-06-30 13:42:58+00:00): Hey Joost zou dit nieuw stuk fietspad niet in de F20 relatie gezet moeten worden?
joost schouppe (2022-06-30 14:21:39+00:00): Goed punt, ik heb het aangepast. Ik denk dat ik het nog niet gedaan had omdat dit segment nog niet af is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071702046
(en ik had geen zin om het twee keer op alle zes die relaties te doen). Maar ik heb het nu alvast toch over dat stukje laten lopen, dat wordt toch snel afgewerkt neem ik aan.
Aanpassingen in changeset 123047704
LorenzoPesci (2022-06-21 09:19:16+00:00): Salve, perché cancellare il nome a quell'albero monumentale?
Con quel nome è conosciuto e serve inoltre a trovarlo su Osm e OsmAnd, a cui ho chiesto di indicizzare con denotation=natural_monument, ma per ora solo il nome dà accesso alle informazioni relative
GBAB (2022-06-27 14:58:05+00:00): Salve Lorenzo,
la roverella di Roccaporena non sembra un nome proprio. Non l'ho trovato da nessuna parte (eccetto su OSM e pagine che si riferiscono di OSM). Quindi questo non sembra la roverella ma una roverella di Roccaporena (anche se grande come gia' si vede dal tag "denotation").
Che cosa ne pensi?
Saluti
Gábor
Becky Candy (2022-06-22 08:22:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping! Please, zoom in and out in order to clearly see if an object is a building or not. Look for a color difference between the roof and ground, shadows and regular geometric shapes (e.g. rectangles or circles).You can also use different imagery to compare for clarity.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122635562
Leo Slager (2022-06-20 21:30:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
HellMap (2022-06-21 12:24:20+00:00): Sveiki! Es nomainīju https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071705792 no landuse=meadow uz natural=grassland. "Meadow" angliski protams ir "pļava", bet OSM tam nozīme ir lauksaimniecībai[1], piemēram ganības vai zāles audzēšana pļaušanai (bet nav vēl gluži labībai).

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow
MxxCon (2022-06-21 02:59:52+00:00): Hello.
"amenity:disused=true" is not a correct way to tag closed businesses.
In the case of Fusco "amenity=resturant" should be changed to "disused:amenity=resturant".
In the case of Spa Here "shop=beauty" should be changed to "disused:shop=beauty".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122635881
MxxCon (2022-06-21 03:04:45+00:00): You can read more about this tag at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused 👍
pWSXmRlg (2022-06-21 03:47:15+00:00): Understood. I see this was corrected by change set 122643924, thank you. I did not understand the prefix notation before.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122635881
MxxCon (2022-06-21 03:50:03+00:00): There are a number of other prefixes that might be of use to you in the future edits https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
hsc666 (2022-06-20 20:59:42+00:00): Hallo Sash78 und willkommen bei OSM!

Leider musste ich Deinen ersten Änderungssatz wieder zurücksetzen, da Du dabei einige Dinge beschädigt hast (z.B. Bäume wild durch die Stadt verschoben) und überflüssige Nodes an vielen Stellen hinzugefügt hast. Bitte sieh Dich im Wiki um, damit Du verstehst, wie Dinge in OSM eingetragen werden.

VG
hsc666
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 22:12:51+00:00): removido
Becky Candy (2022-06-22 07:17:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping! Please, zoom in and out in order to clearly see if an object is a building or not. Look for a color difference between the roof and ground, shadows and regular geometric shapes (e.g. rectangles or circles).You can also use different imagery to compare for clarity.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122636193
ivanbranco (2022-06-29 14:33:38+00:00): Hi CHAINDER19,

I see 7 blocks didn't work out for you.
You're still using useless changeset comments ("1"). You added disconnected ways, ignoring the iD alert ("warnings:disconnected_way:highway"). But most important, you added highway features that ARE NOT visibile in the imagery you say you used for this edit ("Bing Maps Aerial"). I wonder how you edit without aerial imagery reference. Also, those highways seem to be visibile in available imagery ( Maxar and Esri non-clarity), but with different geometry. You can use those if you want to perfect the highways you already draw.

Thanks for the contributions and good mapping
emersonveenstra (2022-06-21 15:29:45+00:00): Hi,

Quick note that `roof:colour
emersonveenstra (2022-06-21 15:30:14+00:00): oops... `roof:colour` needs a # in front of the hex code. I've fixed them for you, just a note for the future :)
karlchick (2022-08-26 19:26:35+00:00): Hi wondering why you've changed some of the local farm tracks from highway=track to highway=service, these are clearly matching the criteria for track, being rough, unsurfaced tracks with weeds growing down the middle?
adrianojbr (2022-06-21 03:19:57+00:00): O POI está correto. Apenas uma sugestão: no momento, em Florianópolis, as imagens da Esri estão mais nítidas e atualizadas (não necessariamente melhor posicionadas). É possível trocar a imagem de fundo no menu lateral direito do iD (editor web). Abraço.
adrianojbr (2022-06-21 03:22:52+00:00): Removi a descrição de name, lembrando que devem ser colocados nomes oficiais. Também removi indoor=yes, pois entendi pela descrição que o parquinho é interno ao Costão, por isso adicionei que o acesso é restrito (privado). indoor=yes é usado para quando um serviço fica dentro de um edifício.
philippec (2022-06-20 22:05:17+00:00): Meulebeke gemeentehuis aed,
waar is dat vergissing in de lat lon gebeurd ?
L'imaginaire (2022-06-24 13:52:56+00:00): Ik begrijp jouw vraag niet. Wat wil je precies weten?
philippec (2022-06-24 14:19:29+00:00): Thilbault maakt de aed op x 249 en y 563
Ik voeg mapillary toe zonder te controleren.
U verandert de coordinaten, dus veronderstel ik dat ze verkeerd waren, ik veronderstel dat ik ze gecontroleerd had.  Dus denk ik dat u een fout bij mij gevonden hebt.  U geeft geen uitleg.
Nu bekijk ik de GRB en de positie van de luifel.  De AED staat nu 2.08 meter van de luifel.
Verbetert u het, of doe ik het ?
L'imaginaire (2022-06-24 14:33:27+00:00): Ik heb met mijn wijziging de geometrie van het gebouw een klein beetje verbeterd (ook al kan dat wellicht nog beter). Hierdoor is de AED 0,18m mee opgeschoven. Het is dus niet zo dat ik een fout bij jou had gevonden. Als je de positie van de AED nog kan verbeteren, dan zou dat natuurlijk heel goed zijn.
philippec (2022-06-24 14:40:57+00:00): Ik heb eens een hele uitleg geschreven waarom het geen goed idee is een aed op een lijn te  zetten.
Dit is  1 van de redenen.
Telkens iemand aan een huis zit krijg ik een melding.
Als ik een AED zet dan kontroleer ik de GRB en gebruik ik lantaarnpalen en riooldeksels enzovoort om zo precies mogelijk te zien.
Indien mogelijk gebruik ik ook de 10 cm precisie luchtfoto.
syntex (2022-06-21 11:33:46+00:00): Wandalizm, zmiana nazw przystanków na fikcyjne
MxxCon (2022-06-21 03:08:47+00:00): Hello.
Is "outdoor pattern" the official name of this feature or something you came up with?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637375
kw-ny (2022-06-21 14:07:22+00:00): I came up with it as I don't know the official name... look at the satellite maps - it's a nice outdoor pattern, but I have no idea what is the official name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637375
kw-ny (2022-06-21 14:08:03+00:00): I came up with it as I don't know the official name... look at the satellite maps - it's a nice outdoor pattern, but I have no idea what is the official name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637375
MxxCon (2022-06-23 04:19:34+00:00): Since this is not its actual name and  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions this doesn't seem like a proper way to tag this feature. At most it could be considered "loc_name", but even then it's just a name that you came up with and not something referred as by others. And that's still a description of the feature and not as much of a name. But just became a feature doesn't have name doesn't mean it can't be mapped, so it's fine for it to be nameless.
You could also consider tagging it as "attraction=maze" + "maze=labyrinth", but these are not officially agreed tags.
kw-ny (2022-06-23 14:14:55+00:00): OK! please feel free to delete this feature. I was just keen to add some detail as it's a really cool outdoor feature if you visit in real life and you can see it on google/bing satellite map... Jersey City waterfront has so little detail on the waterfront compared to Manhattan waterfront
MxxCon (2022-06-23 14:39:51+00:00): There's no need to delete it since it's there. However, it shouldn't have a name which doesn't exist.
MxxCon (2022-06-21 03:11:36+00:00): Hello.
For node 9834318940 "amenity=restaurant" + "building=construction" combination doesn't make sense.
Could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637416
pWSXmRlg (2022-06-21 03:36:12+00:00): I was trying to say the restaurant is not yet completed. That's the closest I could find in the wiki under construction. The restaurant is part of an airport, so it is not technically a building on its own. Do you know how to tag this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637416
MxxCon (2022-06-21 03:47:20+00:00): You could use opening_date= tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date
But if you don't know the opening date, perhaps don't map it and instead leave OSM note in that location with relevant details.
pWSXmRlg (2022-06-23 13:37:59+00:00): In that lifecycle prefix wiki page you sent, it looks like construction:amenity might be possible. What do you think

From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
> For other higher-level tags, e.g. leisure=*, please use a lifecycle prefix instead: construction:leisure=playground
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637416
MxxCon (2022-06-23 13:55:53+00:00): You might be misunderstanding that tag. It is intended to be used with building=construction, highway=construction, landuse=construction or railway=construction to give more specific information about that object.
Based on what I see it's not intended for POIs.
Glassman (2022-06-23 16:41:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please save and upload your edits to small geographical areas. Large edits like this one are hard to review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122637463
vanoitran (2022-06-30 06:05:10+00:00): Thanks for letting me know! I'll be sure to do that going forward :)
toeklk (2022-07-21 20:21:02+00:00): Hi Noelbov, could you please clarify why you deleted the Boschweg (aka Buurtweg 38) on both sides of the Lostraat?  Your changeset comment is not really self-explaining :-(
BR,
Toeklk
noelbov (2022-07-21 21:34:29+00:00): Sorry, I tought that road had been closed, but in hindsight, by own survey, I have to admit it was wrong.
So I did a changeset revert.

Kind regards
toeklk (2022-07-22 07:39:19+00:00): No problem.  Thanks for your prompt reaction and action!
gscscnd (2022-06-20 20:38:06+00:00): Dzięki!
Dodko (2022-06-21 08:18:40+00:00): Ak máš viac informácií o prameni môžeš používať aj tieto značky.

Je to upravená/zastrešená studnička
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:Tag:refitted%3Dyes

či je pitná voda
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:drinking_water
glauconeto (2022-06-21 11:27:57+00:00): Condomínios não aparecem no mapa
Hufkratzer (2022-06-21 18:41:27+00:00): Shouldn't the tags of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3657032761 better be on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1071755336 ? iD shows a warning for the node: "Horse Riding Centre Witney Pony Partners should be a standalone point based on ots tags". But a standalone point isn't necessary if it is mapped as an area.
messpert (2022-06-21 18:59:28+00:00): Yes. Yes. Josm complained as well.
I was in a hurry and it was a pain to transfer all the tags from the node onto the new way. Not that I think it's a very valid complaint by the editors. Maybe there is a simple way to move the information, but if so I have missed it.

When I have a bit more time, I will try and remember to clean up. Mind you the node is near the entrance, so I should probably tag the entrance as well, although I think there has been some tagging list discussion about entrance tags recently, so I hope that isn't going to be complicated. I might end up adding a small service road with a gate.
messpert (2022-06-21 19:29:00+00:00): OK, I have done a quick fix. By opening both josm and OSM view of the node, I could tranfer the tag information although it was still a bit tedious.
Hufkratzer (2022-06-22 08:47:46+00:00): In JOSM copy and paste works, see
* https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/26603/josm-how-i-can-copy-tags-from-one-object-to-another
* https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Shortcuts
messpert (2022-06-22 09:56:13+00:00): Thanks for spotting that. I even had that plugin installed. I must say that even now, finding that option in the tool icons is not easy, and I need to remember to search for the right term (paste, say) to find shift-R. Josm is wonderful and can do almost anything, but when in a hurry, it is hard to find just what is needed for unfamiliar use cases.
Mappers_Delight (2024-10-08 17:50:33+00:00): Is any information available on how and when the tag bicycle_parking=gent should be used (instead of for instance bicycle_parking=safe_loops, which is the type of this particular bicycle parking)?
M!dgard (2024-11-11 17:54:43+00:00): Hi, it was used for the type of bike parkings pioneered by Ghent but they should now be retagged to safe_loops if you ask me.
glauconeto (2022-06-21 11:29:24+00:00): Os condomínios inseridos não estão sendo mostrados no mapa
DressyPear4 (2022-06-21 11:36:05+00:00): Dê um Ctrl+F5 no navegador, dependendo da quantidade de modificações e do carregamento do servidor, demora um pouco para renderizar
osmviborg (2022-06-21 05:14:29+00:00): Vær venlig ikke at redigere adresse-punkterne!
b-holdet (2022-06-21 06:30:51+00:00): Forklarende mail er afsendt til bruger Opspind
SomeoneElse (2022-06-20 22:39:16+00:00): Also Wigginton from survey 29/5/2022, tr8881b
Szymson (2022-06-21 15:09:34+00:00): Ale to na pewno nie są drogi drugorzędne, grubo przesadziłeś
Szymson (2022-06-21 15:14:34+00:00): Ok, poprawiłem
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122673501
porfiriopaiz (2022-06-21 05:00:23+00:00): Hola MorganeTsl.

Hice unos cambios menores en los nombres comunes de los siguientes árboles:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9834697917

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9834685148

Tengo una duda sobre el nombre de este árbol:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9834668625

¿Te refieres a una "Mata de Chagüite" o Planta de Plátano/Banano?

https://dle.rae.es/chag%C3%BCite

Saludos,
Porfirio
aceman444 (2022-07-05 07:43:52+00:00): Hallo, danke fuer die Details.
Aber die Punkte wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9834709444 sind doch keine traffic_calming. Die Strassen solten eigentlich gespaltet werden ins individuelle Wege fuer jede Richtung. Aber die Busrelationen mussen angepasst werden. Ich werde es versuchen.