piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nlme (2022-08-20 14:12:20+00:00): This whole changeset needs to be reverted (when I first commented I had only looked at the relations).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9965468820 is already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556435241 for example

Emwavenet, please take the overpass turbo wizard and type "antenna" into it and see how the search functionality works there.

I'm also not entirely sure if you understand what we mean by "copyright" if you place it into inverted commas. What was the actual source of this dataset?
yasslay (2022-08-20 14:51:57+00:00): Hello!

Was this mechanical edit discussed prior to being published? If so, please provide the link to where it was discussed. (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct)

Kind regards,
AOOSMU
Aranc (2022-08-20 15:49:13+00:00): The correct term is "Medium wave" not "middle wave"
user_2398645 (2022-08-20 16:36:43+00:00): This comments on the words from "nlme" ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nlme ).

"This whole changeset needs to be reverted"
-- Useful data deserves sharing, improving, instead of reverting.

" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9965468820 is already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556435241 for example " ... "type 'antenna' into it and see how the search"
-- Towers, antennas, radio stations, and transmitters are different things. OpenStreetMap has no ability yet to handle the relationship among them. This dataset is not complete, just an initial step to a better version. You cannot make a perfect map with a big dataset by just one time of edit/upload to OpenStreetMap. If you think some relation is missing, you can try to add it, not to remove the nodes of the relationship.

If you search "antenna", can you filter the result items about their powers in kW? About operational levels/scales by the totally different abilities in transmitting long wave, short wave, middle wave, or microwave? Can you or the search engine do things for my further steps of sharing the data? Can you quickly search and verify about the existence of your geographical objects in a big dataset? Why don't you add new data and merge rare duplicates later? The search engine is not perfect, why the dataset or format should be?

"What was the actual source of this dataset?"
-- Stop thinking that you need one source to get a nontrivial dataset. The summary of this changeset tells viewers that satellite images are the first source, then your knowledge about transmitters can guide you through the recognition, finally local news and user reports can help you verify about some detailed data. So, if you think all the information from these sources is on the internet, then it's the  internet as a source. "Public" means "public domain", "non-secret", and "free of copyright".

If you are a developer of OpenStreetMap, try to make a better system and meet the natural needs of users. If you are a map maker as a data provider, provide your own data, never think of reverting or removing data from other contributors.

OpenStreetMap has a potential to be the best public map about the surface of this planet, only if it keeps open. It is never some people's own integrated map that is draft-phobic.
yasslay (2022-08-20 16:53:16+00:00): Hello!

Emwavenet, although I am not the intended recipient of your message as it seems, other users want to see all the sources you're using, no matter if it is just one source. Unless they were implying you used one source I don't think they were.

In regards to the developer comment, I am sure features added to OpenStreetMap are often voted upon by the community to be officially added after it has been proposed. If you wish to have more information on the topic, please see the wiki page regarding it. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process)

OpenStreetMap could be one of the best public maps, however I do not exactly get your comment regarding keeping it open, or whatever you were going on about it being "draft-phobic." OpenStreetMap will and always will remain open to all users from anywhere on this planet, however it is important that all mappers adhere to good practices as stated above, however all OSM users are liable to action being taken upon them if they are found to be adding inaccurate, dubious or otherwise intentionally adding falsified data to OSM.

Additionally, I would like it if you could answer my question on whether or not this mechanical edit was discussed with the community, and also your future edits should be geographically sized. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets.

Kind regards,
yasslay (formerly AOOSMU)
user_2398645 (2022-08-20 17:46:58+00:00): Hi yasslay / AOOSMU, all the kind comments about data completeness or data format are welcome. I can discuss with their authors about anything including the deep concepts of the design of OpenStreetMap. But the think of "wholly reverting" any big or small dataset from other contributors, are disrespectful of their effort.
yasslay (2022-08-20 17:58:13+00:00): Hello,

The reverting of changesets occurs because it has been proven that the data added to OSM goes against the guidelines of OSM and such. For example, duplicating features deliberately vandalising the map etc can lead to your changeset being reverted. That being said this discussion should not be turned into an unrelated debate regarding the reverting of changesets.

Kind regards,
yasslay
user_2398645 (2022-08-20 18:46:43+00:00): Hi yasslay,

"proven that the data added to OSM goes against the guidelines of OSM and such." -- I totally don't accept this. If it worths, I can disprove their points one by one.

Technically, if the system accepts a data format, then the format is legal. Data and knowledge about the physical world are more important than the rendering format. The rules on the "wiki" pages of OpenStreetMap cannot replace any technical rules. If OpenStreetMap judges on data by voting, not only by physical facts, then OpenStreetMap is not a place for professionals in fields other than the field of OpenStreetMap community culture. Anyway, I am just trying OpenStreetMap to share some useful scientific and technological data. If any operator wants to remove my data, go ahead. I will be happy to leave OpenStreetMap.
yasslay (2022-08-20 19:05:38+00:00): Hello,

You still have not answered my question on whether or not you discussed this mechanical edit prior to publishing this changeset. Mechanical edits are classed as large imports of data or large changesets on a geographical scale, like this one. Please answer this question. Also, please answer the question I asked at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125109844, thank you.

Knowledge about the physical world is far more important and this is recognised by OpenStreetMap and some mappers do advocate for other mappers to survey locations before publishing edits.

You seemed to have misunderstood what I meant by the proposal process. Data can be added freely to OpenStreetMap, however certain features (which, for the most part, are tags, e.g. highway=residential) which do not exactly match what you're looking for have been added to OpenStreetMap yet, and typically the community as to what I can understand goes through a voting process on whether or not to accept the addition of a new feature. I provided an example of this as well and this does not apply to edits/changesets.

If you do want to leave OSM then go ahead, however I advise that you should not take this attitude to threatening to leave OSM if an operator does revert your data in the end. Also, reverts are typically discussed to my knowledge before being executed.

We should both stop arguing about this and wait for a DWG correspondent as this is not going anywhere.

Kind regards,
yasslay
user_2398645 (2022-08-20 19:29:30+00:00): To yasslay:

"I will be happy to leave" is not a threaten, but an honest expression. A user's leave does not threaten anyone, because it does not put anyone in danger. Your use of this word is offensive to me. I think you should appologize before any further discussioin can be done. 

When I wrote the sentence, I imagined some people would misuse this word. I didn't say anything about it at that time, because I thought their use of the word only shows their problematic attitude.
user_6110846 (2022-08-20 08:54:16+00:00): ТАКОЖ ПРИБРАВ ДВІЙНИКІВ ЗАЛІЗНИЧНОЇ ЗУПИНКИ
eggie (2022-08-20 09:23:42+00:00): Hi Jelen.. You asked for feedback. I think this is okay.
If a white bicycle-symbol is painted on the road it's cycleway=lane
Greetz,
eggie
jeslop (2022-09-20 14:24:15+00:00): Hola KvB Cycles. Estás añadiendo una gran cantidad de nodos con nombres descriptivos. que no aportan más información al mapa. Lee esto antes de continuar haciendo esto:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
Gracias por tu colaboración.

Hi KvB Cycles. You are adding a lot of nodes with descriptive names. This not add valuable information to the map. Please, read this before editing again:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Thanks for contribute to OSM.

Regards

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
Sandal man (2022-08-21 08:28:03+00:00): Gracias por tus ajustes al osm pero dibujas un parque y una pista de carreras en el mismo lugar?
jeslop (2022-08-21 10:59:24+00:00): He borrado los parques porque ninguno se ajusta a las características. 

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
Diacritic (2022-08-21 08:51:38+00:00): Hi Tashleigh. In this change, you've accidentally changed the footpath on Wellington Street to a hopscotch game. I've fixed it for you now. :)

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125139523
mueschel (2022-08-21 08:42:44+00:00): Hallo,
was bedeuten denn die "x..." Tags hier?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086391521
joost schouppe (2022-09-07 14:12:13+00:00): Wat was je redenering om bijvoorbeeld deze als bicycle=designated aan te duiden? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283436376
JanFi (2022-09-07 14:55:07+00:00): Dat het een vrij fietspad is. En omdat de wiki verbiedt om zulke fietspaden als fietspaden aan te duiden, moet je het op een andere manier doen.
iWowik (2022-08-23 13:27:50+00:00): Не понял насколько документ актуален, какая система координат, и как вы пересчитывали их в систему, принятую в OSM?
Serzhanya (2022-08-25 06:33:46+00:00): По конвенции ООН по морскому праву территориальное море шириной 12 ммиль отмеряется от береговой линии наибольшего отлива и от установленных прямых базовых линий. По этим правилам и уточнял границы. Кроме этой декларации СССР мне в принципе никакой документ не удалось найти по базовым линиям  на Дальнем Востоке. На других ресурсах и на морских навигационных картах эти базовые линии из декларации учитывают, поэтому, полагаю, документ актуальный. Поправку на систему координат не делал.
Serzhanya (2022-08-25 06:35:27+00:00): https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/STATEFILES/RUS.htm   - здесь весь список документов, касающихся морских границ России, представленных на сайте ООН.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-27 11:07:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125438483 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal data in western Ukraine
jcr83 (2023-07-02 10:45:37+00:00): Bonjour, 
Vous avez ajouté le sommet Hundskopf alors qu'il était déjà présent dans OSM à environ 400 m vers l'est-sud-est. Pouvez-vous vérifier SVP ?
franklin9 (2023-07-03 11:16:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Le sommet qui était renseigné dans OSM n'était pas bien placé. Il n'était pas au point culminant de la crête (1236 vs 1237m).
L'endroit où est placé le nouveau sommet est également en adéquation avec la carte ign.
jcr83 (2023-07-03 13:45:39+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci pour votre réponse, je comprends mieux. Le problème est que BaboucheVerte a rajouté le nom sur le mauvais sommet, d'où le doublon. Je vais le contacter ...
paganella31 (2023-03-01 20:52:01+00:00): source: survey
map per (2022-08-21 07:12:54+00:00): Hello nullmedium,

welcome to OpenStreetMaps!
You asked for a review of your change: Everything is fine, thanks for your contribution.

map per
eggie (2022-08-22 06:32:53+00:00): Beste Anton.. Beter geen vlakken vastplakken aan de wegen. 
MVG
eggie
Anton_G (2022-08-22 06:38:58+00:00): Thanks, I'll try not to innthe future.
eggie (2022-08-22 06:43:13+00:00): Okay... enjoy mapping
greetz
eggie
ma-rt-in (2023-01-01 13:07:56+00:00): Hallo Till,

deine Änderungen, das hinzufügen eines Eigennamen, hat leider keinen zutreffenden Effekt. Den weiterhin findet man nach den Daten hier einen Papier-Container, auch wenn der EIgennamen anderes lautet. 
Aber Eigennamen ist ein gutes Stichwort. Die Container haben i.d.R. keinen Eignennamen.
Ich werde das für dich mal fixen.

vg
bkil (2022-08-20 12:30:10+00:00): Köszönjük a közreműködést! Esetleg szabadna kérni, hogy a surface=unpaved helyett a terepi bejárás szerinti lehető legspecifikusabb burkolatot vigyük fel a gyalogos ösvényre (path), gyalogútra (footway) vagy két nyomon haladó mezőgazdasági útra (track)? https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:surface#Unpaved
eggie (2022-08-20 11:01:13+00:00): Dag requinard.. Je vraagt feedback. Niks mis met zo'n bankje hier.
groet
eggie
danieldegroot2 (2022-08-20 16:59:29+00:00): The housenumber of this building is already specified. I would suggest removing it, or adding POI details.
b-unicycling (2022-08-21 15:26:41+00:00): I've fixed it; there are two doors, so I split the building into no. 8 and nohousenumber.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-27 11:07:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125438483 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal data in western Ukraine
user_3022894 (2022-12-04 21:01:26+00:00): Hi Streetview247,

bitte keine Tunnel unterhalb von bereits als Brücke markierten Straßen oder Wegen erstellen (dies betrifft in diesem Fall https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087676545).

Eine zusätzliche Eintragung eines Tunnels ist hier nicht nötig. Wir nutzen immer entweder Brücke oder Tunnel, aber möglichst nicht beides auf einmal. Das wäre einerseits "doppelt gemoppelt", andererseits auch falsch.
Es sollte immer nur eines von beidem vorhanden sein - entweder haben wir eine Brücke (in der allermeisten Fällen), oder (seltener) einen Tunnel. In der Regel ist das aber alles bereits korrekt eingetragen und bedarf keiner Ergänzung.
Vielen Dank!

Viele Grüße
Lukas
tastrax (2022-08-20 11:42:14+00:00): Thanks for adding buildings. Unfortunately many of the Microsoft building footprints are very poor representations of the actual buildings. Please align them and adjust as necessary rather than just accept them at face value, especially where there is recent better imagery.
literan (2022-08-29 06:14:13+00:00): ну и зачем вы дорогу уничтожили? откат
zaharovrd (2022-08-29 06:27:23+00:00): Я камеру удалил. Её там нет. Ездил неделю назад
zaharovrd (2022-08-29 06:27:58+00:00): Или я накосячил?)
Как исправить?
literan (2022-08-29 06:49:08+00:00): этой правкой вы удалили тег дороги, и вместо него на всю длину дороги повесили тег камеры. Я не знаю, как так у вас получилось.

я уже все исправил
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-08-26 23:16:37+00:00): Добрый день.

1)
> addr:city=КП Аннинские высоты, addr:street=Аннинские высоты

Такого city и такой street не существует. КП Аннинские высоты – это place	(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr:place).

2) Вы создали дома там, где уже были добавлены адреса, например: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087680433 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9823754125 (у юзера avi32 addr:city тоже лишний). Надо было тогда удалить адресную точку, скопировав её теги на здание.

3) По поводу https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966491085 (oneway=no): "Не стоит обозначать таким образом любые дороги с двухсторонним движением! Такое обозначение имеет смысл лишь тогда, когда его отсутствие может привести к ошибкам (например, дорога недавно перестала быть односторонней, или расположена в районе, где все другие похожие дороги являются односторонними)" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:oneway).
iWowik (2022-08-31 05:38:43+00:00): addr:city=КП Аннинские высоты нормально, если есть place=allottements с таким именем.
А вот вместо addr:street нужен addr:place=КП Аннинские высоты
nett_ef (2022-09-07 23:50:07+00:00): Исправлено в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125920989
avi32 отметил номера участков, на которых впоследствии построили дома. я прошел пешком этот участок, отмечая GPS точки линейных объектов (столбов) и положения домов относительно них
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-08-25 08:28:29+00:00): اهلا ابو شهاب
هذه خريطة عامة أرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكنك الشخصية إلى الخريطة العامة واستخدم البرامج الشخصية لحفظ أماكنك الشخصية
BCNorwich (2022-08-21 06:27:24+00:00): Hi, I've removed the way Auchleven (427719668, v5) as it duplicates Way: 1087668290.

I've added a POI Node: Auchleven (9967139734) to hold the village data as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard
Waaslander (2022-08-20 11:20:32+00:00): *Puyenbrug
PeeWee32 (2022-08-20 16:03:43+00:00): Lekker bezig Roelieboelie ;) . Groetjes Peter
Roelieboelie (2022-08-20 18:01:40+00:00): Gas erop. Prima tool.
eggie (2022-08-20 12:52:21+00:00): Hi Ed.. No rest_area   here. It's a parking
 I will delete your contribution. 

 Greetz,
eggie
balint36 (2023-03-09 23:01:56+00:00): A valóságban nincsen itt felhajtási lehetőség, így a szegmens hozzáadásával olyan kapcsolatot teremtettél, ami nem is létezik.

A Bing térkép, amire dolgoztál, az elavult, a bekötő út mind a két oldalán vízelvezető árok van, a mezőgazdasági utak felhajtói csak az út végében és a déli oldalán maradtak meg.

Emiatt inkább visszaállítom az előző állapotot.
bkil (2023-03-10 10:33:09+00:00): Esetleg fel lehetne enni a vízelvezető árkokat is a térképre? Gyalog sem átjárható?
balint36 (2023-03-10 12:09:23+00:00): Hát, az árkon át tudsz gyalog menni, de amikor ott jártam úgy gondoltam, hogy nem célszerű.
Egyéb jelölésekhez, így az árkok pontos helyzetéhez is frissebb alaptérkép lenne szükséges, mert az út is sacc per kábé van berajzolva, a közeli tereptárgyakhoz viszonyítva.
gkovacsp (2023-03-11 19:55:30+00:00): Nem a Bingről rajzoltam hanem eltekertem arra, a bike-tracket használtam a szerkesztéshez, de majd újra megnézem idén.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-27 11:07:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125438483 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal data in western Ukraine
trigpoint (2022-08-20 14:46:42+00:00): Hi
SJ 269413 is not a ref. It is an OS grid reference which is just a location which can also be derived from the OSM location,

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2022-08-29 09:35:02+00:00): No response so I have removed the grid reference from the reference tag.
GinaroZ (2022-08-21 10:59:03+00:00): Are the schools open? If so amenity=school should be better added to them.
brechiner (2022-08-21 13:07:14+00:00): Two of the three schools are open. Amenity tag has been added.
Langlaeufer (2022-08-20 17:32:13+00:00): habe bus=yes ergänzt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125145144
Syl (2022-08-21 10:11:41+00:00): Salut, 2 autres bancs été créés à côté peu avant (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9963295832/history et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9963252791/history). Est-ce les mêmes que ceux que tu as ajouté ?
Vinber (2022-08-21 10:22:09+00:00): Salut Syl,
oui tu as raison, je vais corriger les bancs, je suis passé hier j'ai encore en tête.
J'ai du oublier de synchroniser en live osmand et justement les bancs venaient d'être ajoutés...
Merci de ta veille :)
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 13:04:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125146811 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
user_5359 (2022-08-21 09:46:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/8221927. what is the meaning of the tag „ 3451i El Bluff-OpenTopo_USGS_(1965)“ = „Maxar & Bing Sat Imagery as of 2022“ ?
miluethi (2022-08-21 12:48:59+00:00): Hi 5359, this is a copy-paste error! Thank you for bringing it to my attention. I just corrected the mistake.
marc__marc (2022-09-15 08:59:27+00:00): Hello,
Laguna de Bluefields iit is not affected by the tides ?
This seems surprising given the extent of its connection with the ocean
Regards,
Marc
miluethi (2022-09-23 12:16:04+00:00): Hi, the Bluefields Lagoon has minimal tide impact. Tides in the Caribbean are generally really low and the Bluefields Lagoon has also significant amounts of fresh water from several major rivers. 
But of course there is no clear answer to this.
Langlaeufer (2022-08-20 16:25:51+00:00): Etwas für einen feldweg erklären, dass nicht mehr existiert, ist aber auch nicht gerade sinnvoll, oder?
Hab ihn jetzt mal gelöscht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125145867
Langlaeufer (2022-08-20 16:26:37+00:00): Etwas für einen feldweg erklären, dass nicht mehr existiert, ist aber auch nicht gerade sinnvoll, oder?
Hab ihn jetzt mal gelöscht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125145867
Gerd Fahrenhorst (2022-08-20 16:32:05+00:00): Hm, also im iD kann ich ihn nicht löschen solange der Bus 700 dort fährt. Wenn du den Busroute umlegen kannst (ich weiß nicht wie) kann der Weg (und der am Goetheplatz) weg.
Gerd Fahrenhorst (2022-08-20 16:43:56+00:00): Der 700er Bus fährt stadteinwärts bereits auf der neuen südlichen Braunstraße. Es muss diese Route auf die neue Straße umgelegt werden, ich würde es gerne tun aber weiß nicht wie.
Langlaeufer (2022-08-20 16:58:10+00:00): Busroute hab ich weggenommen und Weg gelöscht.
Der 700 fährt nur auf der südlichen spur? oder gibt es auch die gegenrichtung auf der Nordspur?
Gerd Fahrenhorst (2022-08-20 17:00:17+00:00): Im Moment ist die Nordspur Baustelle, der Bus kann dort noch nicht fahren.
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 13:04:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125146811 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
trigpoint (2022-08-20 14:15:41+00:00): Hi
Whilst these may not be the most sensible manoeuvres, they are not actually illegal. There are no signs prohibiting U turns here. 
What sources have you used?

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2022-08-22 17:36:18+00:00): Hallo 
Dies sind zwar nicht die vernünftigsten Manöver, aber sie sind nicht wirklich illegal. Es gibt hier keine Schilder, die U-turns verbieten. 
Welche Quellen haben Sie verwendet?
trigpoint (2022-08-29 09:22:34+00:00): No response so reverting
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 14:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125150763 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
cartofy (2023-01-20 08:57:55+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM. It's great that you're adding buildings and other details to OSM. However, there are quite a few buildings which have been drawn very strangely. 

For example,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087706853#map=19/18.54731/73.79930 - these are very clearly tqo different buildings, and eight of them have diagonal walls. Please go through articles which define how buildings should be drawn, for example: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
Tomas Straupis (2022-08-20 19:12:45+00:00): Adresai nėra pastatai. T.y. adresas egzistuoja/atsiranda dar iki pastato atsiradimo ir tęsia savo egzistavimą net po pastato nugriovimo. Taigi adresų taškų trinti nereikėtų, jie pagal Vilniaus miesto savivaldybės duomenis sutvarkomi.