piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2022-06-13 06:49:14+00:00): Hi zlyntud,
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here? And can you please educate yourself about how to write proper changeset comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-06-27 05:56:53+00:00): Hi zlyntud,
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here? 
Guido
Supaplex030 (2022-06-06 09:04:36+00:00): Hallo Chemnitzer13, die Gleise, die du hier umgetaggt hast, sind meines Wissens nach nicht mehr vorhanden (auf Luftbildern sind dort inzwischen asphaltierte Wege zu erkennen). Lediglich ganz am Ende vor dem alten Lok-Schuppen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32547447) liegen noch ein paar Meter Gleise. Daher würde ich die Änderung wieder rückgängig machen (die Infos waren vorher mit "razed:" getaggt). Oder habe ich etwas übersehen..?
Chemnitzer13 (2022-06-06 11:52:40+00:00): Hallo,
nein, sie waren außer auf der Brücke überhaupt nicht eingezeichnet. Ich werde es ändern.
user_2066394 (2022-06-06 13:04:40+00:00): power=terminal auf den Dächern wirkt nicht so rund
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=terminal
forstner-m (2022-06-06 16:34:10+00:00): Danke für die Information. Welchen Tag soll man dann verwenden?
user_2066394 (2022-06-06 18:15:15+00:00): Das ist eben die Frage :-)
Was vielfach verwendet wird, ist power=pole . Osmose meldet das als potenziellen Fehler (power object intersecting building). Manche lassen auch power=pole weg und zeichnen nur die Leitung.
power=terminal ist in dem Sinn eher ein Abschluss.

Stichwort ist in dem Sinn "Freileitung", also Überlandleiung.
eikosm (2024-10-11 07:32:37+00:00): Warum wird hier der Unicode Block "Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols" für die Buchstaben des Names verwendet?
4004 (2022-06-05 22:58:03+00:00): убрали провал? костыльные access тоже бы убрать тогда
Rico557 (2022-06-06 07:21:51+00:00): Да, убрали. Я уже и подзабыл, что тут ливнёвка была.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Hunte (2022-06-05 19:10:03+00:00): Moin,
Kannst Du bitte die Fehler schließen nachdem Du die bearbeitet hast? Sieht sonst alles so 'Rot' aus:)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121984480#map=18/53.15181/8.19040&layers=N

Danke:)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-06-09 10:55:35+00:00): Roads should be mapped as one way unless separated physically
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121984509
syntex (2022-06-21 08:55:45+00:00): Nie są w budowie i nie ma takich planów. Wandalizm
francians (2022-06-06 05:17:31+00:00): Grazie del contributo!
Buona giornata
Francesco
user_2066394 (2022-06-06 13:31:24+00:00): historic=building trifft nicht mehr zu?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Kulturdenkmale_in_Wertheim
comcat-roy (2022-06-06 15:38:14+00:00): Doch, das ist auch weiterhin ein Historisches Gebäude daran hat sich nichts geändert, sorry. Aber es ist da auch ein neuer Unverpacktladen drinnen. Ich habe es, hoffentlich korrekt, wieder eingetragen.
user_2066394 (2022-06-06 19:58:06+00:00): Einwandfrei

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/4194521002
Für den Unverpackt-Laden  hätte man auch den bereits vorhandenen POI weiterverwenden und aktualisieren können, dann bleibt die Versionsgeschichte erhalten.
eggie (2022-06-05 17:15:46+00:00): Dag Matthijs.. Hier kun je zien welke tags al ingebakken zijn in een highway=path

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands 

MVG
eggie
Ill_Lock_9043 (2022-06-08 19:38:34+00:00): Hallo Eggie, mijn OpenStreetMap gebaseerde navigatie wilde me niettemin met de auto dit pad op sturen ;) vandaar de expliciete markering
eggie (2022-06-08 19:44:15+00:00): Oke.. maar dan zit er iets niet goed in die routing app.
De app bouwer zal zich 'moeten' confirmeren aan de taggingafspraken binnen osm. 
Over welke router heb je het?
Groet
Eggie
Ill_Lock_9043 (2022-06-08 19:49:10+00:00): Ik gebruik MapFactor Navigator
eggie (2022-06-08 19:53:43+00:00): In dat geval kun je het beste een berichtje sturen naar MapFactor en dan stuur je die link mee.. Maar wellicht is de routing niet speciaal op Nederland gericht?
Er is er geen een perfect.
Ill_Lock_9043 (2022-06-08 20:00:47+00:00): Ok zal ik doen! De app is niet speciaal voor Nederland inderdaad
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-06 06:09:11+00:00): Laba diena. Šitas kelias tikrai pažymėtas ženklu „automagistralė“?
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-06 07:28:15+00:00): Atšaukiau šį ir kitus du susijusius pakeitimus. Į OSM suvedame realiai egzistuojančius objektus. Rašyk, jei kas neaišku, turi klausimų. Sėkmės.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-06-05 17:34:55+00:00): Please use bicycle=dismount when there is no sign saying bicycles are not allowed.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-06-05 17:33:59+00:00): Please use bicycle=dismount instead of bicycle=no, because there is no sign to specify that bicycles are not allowed. Many people, especially children, cross the park on their bicycle, or dismounted and this is perfectly fine. Thanks!
JIFFNET (2022-06-05 17:06:26+00:00): Source: Survey, Orto, Isok
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 19:08:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9796897407/history

what you were trying to map here?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
Langlaeufer (2022-06-08 05:56:39+00:00): Die Straße hat einen Fußweg auf dem man zu Fuß gehen darf. Daher ist foot=no hier falsch
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121988073
parukhin (2023-05-23 18:20:52+00:00): Коллега, здравствуйте.
Подскажите, а зачем вы подстанциям в name добавляете "Подстанция"?
Например,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330987724/history
gscscnd (2022-06-07 07:00:49+00:00): Jest maxspeed:backward i maxspeed:forward — maxspeed jest zbędne.
gscscnd (2022-06-07 07:07:15+00:00): Jest już maxspeed:forward — trzeba to jakoś razem połączyć.
eggie (2022-06-05 19:40:40+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.

Bedankt voor je bijdrage..
Feedback  Alleen een naam gaat niets doen in OSM.
Wellicht heb je wat aan deze info.
Eigen bedrijf toevoegen 

https://www.onosm.org/ 

en 

 

https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/11/46.87897/8.23975 

 

En video 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6edDUi1o9RA 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-06-05 19:43:31+00:00): Wat info toegevoegd zodat e.e.a. rendert
Gr eggie
gscscnd (2022-06-07 07:10:47+00:00): maxspeed nie pasuje do maxspeed:backward i maxspeed:forward.
gscscnd (2022-06-07 07:11:27+00:00): maxspeed=50 nie pasuje do PL:rural.
Hasnep (2022-06-05 17:52:47+00:00): See note 121988592 for a photo
Scalarik (2022-06-07 11:34:05+00:00): Hi there, do you actually check if these are completed? Some of these have actually been done for weeks, but you've marked them as not completed.
pyyhttu (2022-06-07 18:24:16+00:00): Hi. Yes, I semi-regularly drive by this area (Kivistö). 
Some of the constructed roads were missing the asphalt, or if having one, were missing the road markings. There were also construction obstructions left in place to divert traffic, and also witnessed piles of gravel left in the road areas, especially on sidewalks. I'll take pictures next time when pass by and link here.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-06-06 20:47:43+00:00): Please don't just copy paste unsquared buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121988946
Lokai (2022-06-06 15:10:10+00:00): Hallo MCMXCV (StS ?),

die Zahlreichen access-tags sind nicht zwingend zu setzen. Access=yes, Foot, bicycle, sind Standard mit drin. Bei motor_vehicle sollte Schild 260 am Weg stehen. Du brauchst nicht zuerst alles erlauben und dann nochmals anderes erlauben. Das Verbot genügt.

Gruß

L.
frasty (2022-07-24 11:27:29+00:00): Perché è stato messo motor_vehicle=no al casello autostradale? E` davvero chiuso ? Non ho trovato informazioni a riguardo. Se è un errore consiglio di prestare più attenzione alle modifiche perché un errore come questo condiziona pesantemente il calcolo del percorso alle app di navigazione. Rimuovo.
frasty (2022-07-24 11:27:50+00:00): intendo il nodo #5382597915
SebastianoPistore (2022-07-25 15:07:28+00:00): Ho sbagliato, hai fatto bene a sistemarlo. Grazie.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-06 05:49:37+00:00): Laba diena. Su gyvūnais tai nelabai susiję. Pieva ir tiek. Mes tiesiog esam sutarę, kad landuse=meadow - pieva kaip atskira žemėnauda, o landuse=grass - žolės ploteliai/pievutės virš kitos žemėnaudos - gyvenamosios/komercinės/pramoninės.
user_5359 (2022-06-06 11:27:47+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kurze Bitte: Könntest Du den Geschäftseintrag bitte in das Haus mit der gleichen Hausnummer verschieben? Ich würde statt des aussagelosen Image Eintrages auch einen entsprechenden Eintrag unter dem Schlüssel webseite sowie eine Klassifizierung als office=it empfehlen.
ovruni (2022-06-05 19:18:54+00:00): Aquí nuevamente se han eliminado etiquetas de uso de suelo como en sus conjuntos de cambios anteriores, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
Mingwei (2022-06-05 18:39:35+00:00): https://twitter.com/goldendenizen/status/1533241205227548672/photo/1
vectro (2022-07-09 23:08:53+00:00): Hi SBM3, I agree the roads here are accessible but according to the OSM wiki, access=yes means "The public has an official, legally-enshrined right of access", which I don't think is right here? What do you think about access=permissive instead? The wiki defines that as, "Open to general traffic until such time as the owner revokes the permission which they are legally allowed to do at any time in the future.", which I think does describe the situation here. What do you think?
SBM3 (2022-07-10 02:54:02+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your note and suggestion. I believe you are right, and I have no issue with access = permissive.
ovruni (2022-06-05 19:19:11+00:00): Aquí nuevamente se han eliminado etiquetas de uso de suelo como en sus conjuntos de cambios anteriores, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
woodpeck (2022-06-10 20:04:52+00:00): Dear fayor, can you clarify your source for these edits? You have added a large number of walls in the North of the town (Via Luigi Pirandello etc.) and these walls are not visible on aerial imagery.
fayor (2022-06-10 21:19:04+00:00): Maxar Premium Imagery + conoscenza diretta e sopralluogo. 
I muri ci sono tutti.

Maxar Premium Imagery + direct knowledge and inspection.
The walls are all there.
woodpeck (2022-06-15 20:18:15+00:00): This is how it looks when I request Maxar imagery for the area https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121991066#map=19/37.10495/15.12180:

http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/walls.png

It is impossible to discern the location of inidividual walls on these images. Are you sure you have been using Maxar?
fayor (2022-06-16 15:14:12+00:00): Ciao, io dall'immagine Maxar riesco a distinguere i muretti di delimitazione dei singoli lotti; forse non tutti, qualcuno è coperto dalla vegetazione, possiamo anche discutere se si tratta di muri, siepi o altro tipo di recinzioni, ma una cosa è certa: esistono, come da conoscenza diretta e sopralluogo (fonte principale), non si può andare da una casa all'altra se non uscendo in strada ed entrando dai cancelli.


Hello, from the Maxar image I can distinguish the boundary walls of the individual lots; perhaps not all of them, someone is covered by vegetation, we can also discuss whether it is walls, hedges or other types of fences, but one thing is certain: they exist, as per direct knowledge and inspection (main source), you cannot go to one house to another except by going out into the street and entering through the gates.
user_2066394 (2022-06-07 14:28:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/683084480
Wo gehört das hin?
Shaun das Schaf (2022-06-06 09:52:57+00:00): Hallo MichlWe, willkommen bei OSM!

Du hattest mit diesem Änderungssatz versehentlich den gesamten Waldrand als Straße eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505648241/history

Ist aber nicht schlimm, ich habe es bereits korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
MichlWe (2022-06-07 18:35:24+00:00): Hallo Shaun das Schaf,
danke für die Hilfe, das war mein erster Eintrag.
Ich bin sehr ortskundig im Wehratal und möchte, dass alte Wege nicht vergessen werden. Ich weiß jetzt wie's geht, da werde ich weiter machen.
Gruß
  Michael
syntex (2024-09-01 01:47:00+00:00): Tu na pewno jest muzeum?
Adrian Tync (2024-09-01 06:15:24+00:00): jest to siedziba administracyjna muzeum
syntex (2024-09-01 12:42:24+00:00): To w takim razie jeśli nie jest to dostępne do zwiedzania to tourism=museum wydaje się nieuzasadnione
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-18 08:58:50+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4901570 ?
BubbaJuice (2022-07-25 05:18:11+00:00): Just letting you know this is completely fictional. A check of different imageries shows that the connection was how it was previously.
literan (2022-06-06 19:44:52+00:00): простите, а вы вообще на все объекты в базе собираетесь fixme повесить? ведь теги можно добавлять почти бесконечно. Давайте уж выберем все и добавим fixme=доделайте
BodhidharmaI (2022-06-19 02:15:21+00:00): Что вы имеете в виду под «выберем все»? Тут отмечены только конкретные недавно изменённые маршруты. А какие все вы хотите отметить?
literan (2022-06-19 10:58:58+00:00): тут - маршруты, а в других правках - не только маршруты, но и масса других объектов. 

База OSM по определению всегда неполна, теги можно вешать до бесконечности, форму объектов уточнять до бесконечности. Поэтому такая массовая расстановка fixme обесценивает этот тег. Хотите исправить маршрут - исправьте его.
BodhidharmaI (2022-06-22 23:27:45+00:00): Редактор, которым я пользуюсь на ходу, не позволяет исправить эти маршруты сразу. Поэтому расставляю тэги для себя и для других
literan (2022-06-23 06:13:15+00:00): Например, в этой правке вы расставили массу тегов fixme не на маршруты, а на точечные объекты. Их ваш редактор тоже не может исправлять сразу?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122094955

не надо так делать, пожалуйста.
literan (2022-06-06 19:43:42+00:00): и что означает эта правка? откачу
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
silversurfer83 (2022-06-09 16:33:33+00:00): Moin. Du hast um Review gebeten :)
Meine Meinung zu dem Becken: Gut. Name sieht so aus, als wäre das sehr generisch und könnte eigentlich weggelassen werden. Die restlichen Tags sind gut.
Die Zeichnung könnte etwas "schöner": Die zwei Ecken im Nordosten könnten noch rechtwinklig gemacht werden. Gibt dafür die Taste "Q".
Danke fürs mappen und weiter viel Spass
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121994269
felipeeugenio (2022-06-05 23:37:28+00:00): Hola, por favor considerar landuse=meadow para esos pastos. grass es para otra cosa (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass)

Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121994290
Glassman (2022-06-08 20:55:34+00:00): #TIP: OSM spells out street names instead of using abbreviations. The reason is that abbreviations are hard for software to expand. 

Also can you check the address - the nearby street has a different name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121994609
godfodder (2022-06-09 20:19:14+00:00): Updated.  Thank you!!
Jakob48 (2022-06-19 18:49:43+00:00): Hallo tobim91,

das Bild ist nicht abrufbar, zuviel Google-Code-Schnipsel im Link enthalten, welches Google selbst nicht mehr versteht.

Bitte image=* korrigieren.

Gruß
Jakob48
tobim91 (2022-06-27 12:50:14+00:00): habe ich gemacht https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122909488
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-06 06:26:48+00:00): O čia tikrai egzistuojantis objektas iš principo?
JimmyGoAl (2022-06-05 21:55:19+00:00): En mi comentario de edicion me refiero a Reserva Natural Urbana Bosque de la Ermita, por error puse el nombre de la RNU que agregue antes que esta!
map per (2022-11-09 21:10:17+00:00): Hab den Namen "Ahorn" wieder rausgenommen

VG
map per
Allison P (2022-06-16 23:31:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/898061809 Is this really suffixed "Avenue"? It goes East to West.
h551w (2022-06-17 04:25:14+00:00): I just double-checked the reference pictures I took of the signage and, yep, it is apparently. Definitely some weird inconsistent naming going on in this area
Allison P (2023-04-18 14:46:26+00:00): The plat has finally been recorded and it has Drive. Is an ACHD report in order?
h551w (2023-04-22 01:54:57+00:00): I'm not sure. I'm not going to be able to go out and survey this area anytime soon, so I've got no idea if they haven't changed it on the physical signage yet.
user_5359 (2022-06-06 12:47:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm .org/way/1067005939. The direction of a oneway is always forward. Please reverse the line direction.
Shaun das Schaf (2022-06-05 22:13:21+00:00): Hi,

bist du sicher, dass es diesen Weg nicht mehr gibt?

Vor einigen Jahren bin ich da noch langgeklettert. Und dieser Tour auf komoot nach zu urteilen, gibt es den Pfad/Klettersteig noch immer: https://www.komoot.de/tour/654124020

Dort sind auch Bilder aufgeführt die auf dem gelöschten Weg aufgenommen wurden. Ist auch erst ein paar Monate her, dass die Tour erstellt wurde.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-02-10 21:23:54+00:00): que opinas de este cambio: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132326546/
mueschel (2022-06-20 17:01:01+00:00): Could you check this tree? It got two strange tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9795188772
Britzz (2022-06-23 20:24:44+00:00): Right, i fixed my mistakes, it's ok. Thanks for this warning
lucumon_import (2023-08-14 23:38:35+00:00): Boas Picholeiro, porqué reduciches o tamaño da área que delimita o terreo da antiga estación? O terreo estaba correctamente delimitado anteriormente.
Un saúdo.
gusfak (2022-06-07 21:26:26+00:00): I hope amenity=bbq is only temporary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9797332305
sis651 (2022-06-08 07:55:10+00:00): @gusfak Aah, thanks. I later edit them as manhole, however I seem to miss that point.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-05 22:15:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121996241 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6044 .
NKA (2022-06-06 04:58:15+00:00): Bare et tips: Det er ikke nødvendigl å tagge lanes=* for standardverdiene (som er lanes=1 for enveiskjørte gater og lanes=2 for vanlige gater). Selv synes jeg det er en fordel å ikke tagge dem da - taggingen blir mer oversiktlig. Og kun ha lanes=* der hver enkelt kjørebane faktisk er merket/malt.
norgis (2022-06-07 06:29:26+00:00): Takk for tips, var ikke helt kjent med at lanes hadde standardverdier på hhv. 1 og 2, men det skal jeg ta med til senere
Allison P (2022-06-30 17:57:56+00:00): Some of those proposed names don't sound right. Loop is not an acceptable suffix and several of these are missing predirectionals. Just because the developer submitted them doesn't make them "proposed" in the OSM sense. They will never be built with those names.
h551w (2022-12-17 00:58:21+00:00): Yeah, I was probably a little overzealous with adding some of them
fabiotofy (2022-06-10 12:11:48+00:00): Ciao, ma sei sicuro che la frazione di Clenia arrivi così in basso ? Perchè passato il ristorante "Stara Baba" compare il cartello di fine frazione. Insomma 400 - 500 metri più in sopra del nuovo limite che hai disegnato
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121996498
LB_Manzano (2022-06-10 12:50:06+00:00): Buongiorno Fabiotofy, tutta la parte con i civici da 34 a 39 sono sempre stati di Clenia, per cui il confine li deve contenere.  Anche prima erano di Clenia, ma si notava di meno. Effettivamente il comune non ha fatto un lavoro certosino nel mettere (o nel lasciare) il cartello vicino allo Stara Baba.
Ho notato che a volta i cartelli vengono messi dov'è più comodo piuttosto che dove dovrebbero essere, purtroppo. [Ho trovato errori a Manzano, San Giovanni al Natisone, Cividale del Friuli e Cormons].
fabiotofy (2022-06-10 13:13:19+00:00): Ok, grazie
FenyMufyd (2022-06-10 16:18:35+00:00): Hello Tómas, Thank you for having interest on Borneo and making the landcover here better! 

I have a similar project for Borneo currently running at damn project, but personally i have excluded all/most part of malaysia like in here because the clear forest around the logging path is too many to trace. Do you have any guidelines on how large should a cleared forest become, until it should be traced? thank you again!
Tómas Ingi (2022-06-10 16:38:58+00:00): Hi,

I did notice that there was some logging going on in the forest - I am not aware of any broader consensus on this issue, but I believe that a decent rule of thumb would be to map with a "maintainable" amount of accuracy - that is, update the cleared forests with a level of accuracy such that future changes to the forest (which seem to be quite rapid here) don't overwhelm the maintenance of the map.

To me, in this case it seemed that the cleared areas are still small enough that the area can be said to be "almost entirely forest". Of course, if we decide that the cleared areas have become too large to be classified as a part of the forest, they can always be added in later as inner members - I've found that this method of doing first broader strokes, then adding in more detailed areas later has worked well in the places I normally map land cover (mostly my home country of Iceland). In this case, I tried to locate all the cleared areas that were large enough to contain buildings and add them as inner members from the start.

I would gladly hear your thoughts on this, if you agree/disagree with anything. Always good to hear from other mappers :)
Branko Kokanovic (2023-10-17 18:58:56+00:00): Pozdrav,
Da li ste sigurni da se ova ulica zove "Ljubićska", a ne "Ljubićka"? U RGZ-u jeste navedeno kao "Ljubićska", ali nismo sigurni da je to greška u kucanju?
Dachoni (2023-10-22 11:17:23+00:00): 100% сигуран, 45 година сам живео у том крају, (Хајдук Вељкова 45).
Branko Kokanovic (2023-10-23 08:17:13+00:00): e, ta potvrda sa "lica mesta" nam je trebala, hvala puno!:)
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 18:03:00+00:00): The correct name of the city is Słupia Kapitulna no some "Slupia".

If you are adding names from World War 2, please enter the period in which the name was listed, and add of course the source.
osm-contributor (2022-06-06 01:29:43+00:00): i noticed you started making edits to the map. welcome and thank you for contributing! however, please consider splitting your changesets to smaller regions. smaller regions are easier to manage and do not clutter the map history. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets for more info.