piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wkdgs (2022-03-15 09:26:31+00:00): Hi,

du schreibst "Fußwege", hast aber Zufahrtsstraßen gemappt. Ist das so richtig?

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118486597
StH_Krailling (2022-03-15 18:18:56+00:00): Hallo winkeldings, das ist meine erste Erweiterung (Wegnetz). Ich habe mich an die Definition der Zufahrtsstraßen in der Hubert-Reißner-Straße orientiert. Es handelt sich um einen ca. 2m breiten Weg. Mit PKW nicht befahrbar. Vielen Dank für die Unterstützung.
Gruß StH_Krailling
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118486597
user_507893 (2022-03-15 09:41:44+00:00): Sei so gut und verzichte auf die Eintragung von Objekten, die es seit 79 Jahren nicht mehr gibt. Danke.
horstbu (2022-03-15 10:45:20+00:00): Nun ja - wenn ich hier sehe welche vergangenen Pinkelgleise sonst eingetragen sind dann ist doch wohl der Eintrag einer veritablen Hochbahnstrecke schon aus historischen Gründen relevant. Immerhin neben der in Liverpool in Europa die einzige, die wieder abgerissen wurde.  Viele haben von ihr schon mal gehört und suchen ihre damalige Lage. Daher halte ich diese Strecke durchaus für relevant.
horstbu (2022-03-15 10:47:05+00:00): P.S. - Zumal da, wo sie fuhr sonst keine weiteren Gleise eingetragen sind und sie insofern auch nicht stört und die Sache unübersichtlich macht.
horstbu (2022-03-15 11:11:59+00:00): 2. PS - sehe gerade, dass du offensichtlich die Sache diskussionslos gelöscht hast, Andererseits = Wo suchen Leute die Strecke? Eher in OpenRailwayMap. Und wieso bist du eigentlich befugt zu solchen Entscheidungen?
Nearby0051 (2022-03-19 17:29:22+00:00): Wenn die Gleise nicht mehr existieren, dann gehören sie auch nicht auf die Karte. Daher vermutlich die Löschung durch den anderen Nutzer
mariotomo (2022-03-14 22:16:19+00:00): hi. you're not a local person, yet you're adding and fixing names. what sources are you using, besides aerial photos?
BCNorwich (2022-03-15 19:13:03+00:00): Hi, 
You're adding lots of features with fictional names, service highways, and buildings.
Driveways are not formally named.
Houses have house numbers, those numbers are not also the house names.
Sheds and garages do not have formal names, definitely not named with a house number.
Only verifiable data should be added to OSM.
Some driveways have duplicated sections.

Could you please rectify these problems?

Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2022-03-15 13:13:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040362231. What is the meaning of the tag 2S34 = Khosta?
ivanbranco (2022-03-21 18:48:51+00:00): maybe you forgot to reply, any news? I see you're still active (last CS from 3 hours ago)
MarcoR (2024-09-10 12:40:49+00:00): Ciao Mau59,
con questo changeset hai mappato due entrate al pronto soccorso davanti all'aula studio Pacinotti:

1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7407584771
2) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7407584772

; si tratta per caso di un errore?

Nel caso procedo a rimuovere il tag oppure puoi farlo te se vuoi.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
mau59 (2024-09-10 17:37:35+00:00): Ciao Marco,
non capisco proprio come posso aver fatto una cosa del genere, anche perché, al di là della duplicazione, che c'entra il pronto soccorso in via Buonarroti? Forse volevo taggare dei generici ingressi agli edifici (entrance:yes) e, chissà come, sono spuntati quei tag aggiuntivi, che ho provveduto a eliminare.

Grazie mille e buon mapping anche a te
Danysan95 (2022-03-17 15:50:55+00:00): Se il passaggio è vietato non andrebbe indicato nel nome ma nei tag di accesso ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ), per esempio se è vietato per tutti andrebbe segnalato con il tag access=no
surftrader (2022-03-17 21:22:55+00:00): Grazie della info,ho corretto. Ciao
eggie (2022-03-14 23:16:17+00:00): Hoi..
Voorgaande mapper heeft trouwens overal amenity=school verwijderd.
Op het forum was indertijd het voorstel gedaan om dat nog even te laten staan totdat landuse=education gaat renderen.
landuse=school is uiteraard verkeerd. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-14 23:19:48+00:00): amenity=school toegevoegd.  Ja.. ik weet het.. Dat geeft een foutmelding, maar we willen de scholen nu ook op de adresnode taggen en het is wachten tot landuse=education gaat renderen. 
Zodra dat rendert gaat amenity=school er weer af. 
Gr eggie
Tjuro_Global (2022-03-15 08:56:24+00:00): ja bedankt voor het toevoegen,
Gelukking zit er bewegin in het renderen van landuse=education

Gr MTF
jospyck (2022-03-15 09:07:09+00:00): Beste Rudi, fijn dat je aan Pin je punt deelneemt!
Indien je in de toekomst nog punten zou pinnen, weet dat je een nieuw of bestaand punt ook 
 verder kan verrijken met extra informatie. Deze info kan je invoeren door op je nieuw of een bestaan punt te klikken en dan volgt er een vragenlijst die je kan invullen. Dit is uiteraard geen verplichting, maar weet dan het kan.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Jos Pyck
Toerisme Vlaanderen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118487957
felipeeugenio (2022-03-14 22:30:02+00:00): Hola . Gracias por el cambio
Pero un poco mas al norte también hay una calle que se llama Las Retamas. Supongo que está erróneo también. Si conoce el lugar le pedimos por favor corregir.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2022-03-14 22:30:29+00:00): Ah... veo que ya lo cambió. Ignorar comentario anterior por favor. Gracias
SomeoneElse (2022-12-02 20:55:29+00:00): Garton on the Wolds not Gargrave

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1oyl
user_5359 (2022-04-11 19:57:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851977893. What ist the meaning of the tag highway=u?
user_5359 (2022-03-15 13:43:08+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/555759090, http://www.osm.org/way/555759092. What is the meaning of this three tags
IPP.CodQuadra = 284A013530
NOME = Cosmos
RP = Campo Grande
?
gbragaalves (2022-03-15 13:46:24+00:00): Ops, I'm sorry. I must have missed them while pre-processing the archive. Thanks for the note, I'll fix it.
SomeoneElse (2022-12-02 20:59:49+00:00): Mickleby not Maunby
RaccoonFederation (2022-03-15 01:41:40+00:00): Forgot to change comment. This changeset has lots of different POI street furniture, not just mailboxes
hoserab (2022-03-14 22:29:58+00:00): Sorry, that's changeset 118457979, not  118477957
b-jazz (2022-03-15 18:31:15+00:00): Why was the way that defined the ditch deleted?
boopington (2022-03-15 19:28:08+00:00): it wasn't what do you mean?
boopington (2022-03-15 19:28:59+00:00): oh that one, because it doesn't exist anymore??
b-jazz (2022-03-16 00:49:56+00:00): Oh, interesting. I didn't realize they were building out in that area. I looked at some more recent sat imagery, and I can see the construction. Thanks!
user_5359 (2022-03-15 13:36:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4933731882. What is the meaning of the tag Developer = res?
LostAgent (2022-03-15 20:16:54+00:00): I wanted to insert the website of the developer of the wind farm, but somehow it got saved before I found the correct tag. It can be deleted
ted3sco (2022-03-17 02:12:15+00:00): Din wiki : A no_u_turn restriction relation is primarily useful if the Role from and Role to members are distinct ways. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:restriction&uselang=ro

Scuze, dar nu inteleg rostul acestor restrictii pe un drum cu cate o banda pe sens. Exista indicator rutier in teren si ai avut probleme la rutare ?
Jakka (2022-03-15 07:43:29+00:00): Zijn deze indoor ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:indoor
Dodko (2022-03-15 21:25:01+00:00): Treba opraviť aj riadok so značkou
addr:streetnumber
Dodko (2022-03-15 21:25:24+00:00): Treba opraviť aj riadok so značkou
addr:streetnumber
daviddotto (2022-04-17 16:34:27+00:00): The name 'Throckley Sports Pavilion' does not exist on record.
user_15316258 (2022-04-17 19:24:52+00:00): The building has been named "Throckley Sports Pavilion" by Greenwich Hospital and the adjacent field is a dedicated football pitch as per the plan.  However, as long as you are no longer trying to rename the field after your pet dog, it is of no concern or consequence if you change it to 'Sports Pavilion' and 'Recreation Ground'.
daviddotto (2022-04-17 20:12:48+00:00): 👍
redd (2022-09-11 09:18:20+00:00): Hallo bielebog,
du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an einem Hofladen gearbeitet, bei dem gegenüber der Strasse ist auch noch ein weiterer Hofladen mit gleichen Namen eingezeichnet. Ich gehe von einem Duplikat aus, oder?
Kannst du dir meinen Hinweis mal ansehen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3354814
Vielen Dank,
redd
SomeoneElse (2022-03-14 23:17:20+00:00): oops - you've deleted a weather buoy in the Atlantic!
Heinz_V (2022-03-15 06:12:35+00:00): Oh, sorry. My mistake. Can you please help to restore this node?
SomeoneElse (2022-03-17 23:10:02+00:00): Hello - sorry for the delay - I've restored it now.

I used the "undelete.pl" script from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Revert_scripts .  There's also an "undelete" plugin for JOSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Undelete .
Best Regards,
Andy
krusefahrer (2022-03-18 19:59:52+00:00): Good mapper,

why can't you utilize better changeset comments?
Diacritic (2022-03-16 10:55:16+00:00): Hello MapAnalyser.

It is incorrect to map each turn lane with a separate highway where there is no physical separation.

There are not three separate roads here. I will the unnecessary roads accordingly.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-28 05:22:19+00:00): Please don't use `=peak` if it isn't a high point over the entire surrounding.
ScottNelson (2022-03-18 05:20:44+00:00): I think this changeset may have messed up the direction for oneway trail segments on Olympic Cross-Country Blue in the area where the 3.3km and 5km courses split.  I'm basing this on the trail rendering with oneway arrows from openskimap.org
sixmilesourdough (2022-03-18 05:32:41+00:00): 


Hi there, my intention with the changeset was 2 fold - a) update the relations for the official race courses, and b) ensure that the trails are well segmented to optimize the live-grooming report results (nordic-pulse.com). 

I ordered all of the relation members for the race courses, but wasn’t focused on the trail directions for the named ways.

Are you referring to the relation or ways for Olympic Blue?
ScottNelson (2022-03-18 06:07:56+00:00): The specific ways that I found that seem to have the wrong direction are 114239442 and 118490213, but it looks like you didn't touch the first one at all.  Perhaps they have been wrong all along?
ScottNelson (2022-03-18 06:26:45+00:00): FYI I went ahead and fixed the direction for these ways in a small changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118618746
sixmilesourdough (2022-03-20 03:58:02+00:00): Looks good. Cheers.
jakecopp (2022-03-15 10:42:07+00:00): Thanks!
MaestroGlanz (2022-03-15 08:30:40+00:00): Wenn du willst, kannst du gerne die Notes von mir bearbeiten. Ich verwende die nur sehr oft, wenn etwas geändert werden muss, ich das mobil aber schlecht anpassen kann. In der Regel schließe ich die meisten selbst wieder.
user_2066394 (2022-03-15 09:44:14+00:00): Die Notes kommen im RSS-Feeds, da kann es mal sein, dass man welche von den persönlichen Arbeitsnotizen erwischt, sorry.
user_2066394 (2022-03-15 09:52:29+00:00): -s
MaestroGlanz (2022-03-15 10:58:20+00:00): Ich meine nur, dass die auch liegenbleiben dürfen. Der RSS-Feed würde mich auch interessieren.
user_2066394 (2022-03-15 11:53:15+00:00): RSS kann man hier maßschneidern:
https://tyrasd.github.io/osm-qa-feeds/

Auch nützlich für Notes:
https://ent8r.github.io/NotesReview/
kurisubrooks (2022-03-15 05:06:37+00:00): Hi there, welcome to OpenStreetMaps! I'm very active in this area so I thought I'd point out a few things that I wish I'd known when I'd started. The DCS NSW Imagery, while usually pretty good in alignment, is quite out of date. We usually use Bing for updated imagery (seems to have been taken around March 2021). Please note that Bing isn't as well-aligned as DCS so you need to align it manually. I find -0.13, -1.22 is best for St Clair. (This offset changes from area to area but you can use this value for St Clair. As well as things like landuse and lot boundaries, you can align this to the NSW Base Map, as it's generally considered the "single source of truth" for NSW that lots are aligned to. Roads are generally not aligned to this as however. If you'd like to chat with the Oceania team or have questions etc., feel free to find us in the OSM Discord in the #oceania channel (https://discord.gg/openstreetmap).
lyctkel (2022-06-19 12:50:59+00:00): Hi swimdb,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524452609 which uses building=yesroof:shape.
This looks like a typo to me. I would have fixed it, but I don't know the shape of the roof you wanted to tag. Can you help me here or fix it?
Regrads,
lyctkel
swimdb (2022-06-20 05:16:54+00:00): Thanks for catching that, clearly an error.
user_14117678 (2022-03-15 13:42:33+00:00): Czemu niszczysz dobrze zmapowane obszary mapując je wg map Bing, które są starsze od Geoportalu?
Małgorzata W (2022-03-15 13:50:11+00:00): która zmiana w tym zestawie jest niszczeniem dobrze zmapowanego obszaru? Mapuję na podstawie wizyty w terenie.
user_14117678 (2022-03-15 14:19:06+00:00): Nie, usuwasz poprawnie zmapowane obszary, albo nie odwiedziłaś terenu i kłamiesz albo ponownie celowo wandalizujesz mapę.
Małgorzata W (2022-03-15 14:45:37+00:00): 1. Jakie poprawnie zmapowane obszary usunęłam?
2. Dowód na odwiedzenie tego terenu przez mnie jest tutaj:
https://postimg.cc/gallery/jwS6tKm
3. Przedstaw, proszę swoje dowody na lepszą niż moja znajomość tego terenu.
4. kształt placu zabaw nie jest idealny, ale to nie powód, żeby mówić o "wandalizacji". To powód do dokonania drobnych poprawek (w powiązaniu z p. 5), a nie do oskarżania o wandalizm.
5. Bo właśnie sobie uświadomiłam, że chyba nie jest tu wcale potrzebne mapowanie obszaru "Teren przedszkola" - przedszkole zajmuje budynki i ma plac zabaw. Sądzę, że w takiej sytuacji całe oznaczenie "terenu przedszkola" powinno zostać usunięte, ale to skonsultuję jeszcze na forum w wolnej chwili. 

Bardzo grzecznie proszę, używaj kulturalnego i nieoskarżającego języka w Twoich wypowiedziach.
stragu (2025-02-19 01:39:59+00:00): Hi! This is an old changeset but I thought I'd still comment about the added trees: Beneke's Bush is sufficient for mapping the forest, in this case. No need to map individual trees in this area, especially since their characteristics were not individually assessed. I assume all the individual trees in this area (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9579630107 ) were not all measured to end up all having the exact same height of 9 m and diameter of 11 m?
In any case, the area needs an update given the current construction work. Just a heads up that if I do update the area, I will remove the individual trees in the natural=wood area. (Other trees along highways are fine and I won't touch those.)
Lee Carré (2022-03-15 01:58:33+00:00): Partial correction of http://www.osm.org/changeset/118442456
sjenn1122 (2022-03-15 02:06:00+00:00): Correction, its 80/60 max/min between Bristow and Sapulpa
Mashin (2022-03-15 04:22:28+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Just a small correction, name=* tag is intended for a specific given name of the object. e.g. The Empire State Building
kylor (2022-03-15 02:15:22+00:00): this title is wrong btw, this changeset adds buildings
Elizangela Ferreira (2022-03-16 02:08:45+00:00): Olá! Uma pergunta que parece ser ingênua...poderia representar esta gleba com outra tonalidade de cor? amarelo, por exemplo? ou por estar verde diz que alí tem-se a composição real de uma vegetação? ou foi coincidência...
Felipe Ferreira Monteiro (2022-03-16 17:09:36+00:00): Olá, As cores representadas são definidas automaticamente segundo o uso do solo que foi indicado para o local. Isto garante a qualidade e padronização na representação
Elizangela Ferreira (2022-03-16 18:37:35+00:00): Tudo ok. Após assistir direitinho o vídeo sobre mapeamento colaborativo entendi estas camadas. Bem prático.
喵耳引力波 (2022-03-15 02:51:48+00:00): 建议不认识的自己用谷歌翻译一下
Shanghai Urban Drainage Co., Ltd. Shinan Flood Control Branch
它是一个污水处理厂。

国内军区爱好者们喜欢没事就标军事单位我知道，但是给一个污水处理厂标军事单位是不是有什么大病？过分了啊。

是恨不得国区的OSM死绝？就为了满足你们编辑军区的探索欲？

不要把国内其他人绑架在自己的军事标注爱好上，要玩可以自己去建OpenMilitaryMap，这里是OpenStreetMap，你们走错了
wireguy (2022-03-24 21:02:02+00:00): amuppidi, can you take a look at these two residential relations, they appear to be duplicates:
relation 13924991
relation 13176869

also look at the grass, wood, and landuse relations that you created in this area, they are getting validation errors.
MapperMudkip (2022-04-17 01:04:08+00:00): Just a heads up you seem to have changed a lot of residential roads that are in subdivisions and connected to house driveways to minor/unclassified. Please don't revert residential classification in subdivisions
mavl (2022-05-20 15:42:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:42:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Lee Carré (2022-03-15 15:54:17+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Lee Carré (2022-03-15 15:54:40+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
mavl (2022-05-20 15:42:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
maikeljeferei202 (2022-03-27 19:15:14+00:00): Wilayah Modisi
mavl (2022-05-20 15:42:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mtrnord (2022-03-15 16:08:01+00:00): Thanks a lot. :D I should do fewer typos :O
Jorisbo (2022-03-15 17:34:02+00:00): No problem, i bounce in my own typo's as well :-)  Thx for your contribution. Kind regards Joris
Dimitar155 (2022-03-17 13:48:41+00:00): Промяната е върната в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118594854
mavl (2022-05-20 15:41:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
plennert (2023-01-03 18:40:28+00:00): Hey,
node: 9579915634
are you sure, that this is a sprinkler_connection?
is there a sign indicating which buildings this connection is for?
is the connection freestanding or on the outside wall of the building?
Xanadu_Contractor (2023-01-05 23:30:01+00:00): This is a huge changeset, I will need a node ID to track that down. The one I could find was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442078646, and I do not have the imagery for that anymore. Also, if you have documentation on how to record the kind of info you want (in English), please send it along so I can record to a standard for your map layer.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:41:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:41:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
pyram (2022-04-22 17:36:21+00:00): Review:

Hi Bigyan Acharya,
With this changeset ( http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=118497461 ) you have (accidentally) deleted several nodes and paths. This has resulted in several geometric errors. ( http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=85.57095&lat=27.77190&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points  ) I have undone this.

With kind regards
pyram
Neuwessi11 (2022-03-15 09:27:12+00:00): Hallo StefanHRT,
bist Du sicher, dass die Ausschilderung so ist, wie Du sie getaggt hast (Fußweg, Fahrräder erlaubt)? Ich hatte es dunkel in Erinnerung, als sei es ein ganz normaler highway=path mit Fußgängern und Fahrrädern, kann da aber auch falsch liegen.
Grüße!
Konrad
Neuwessi11 (2022-03-15 09:29:39+00:00): Sorry, ich meinte natürlich nicht den ganzen CS, sondern nur diesen Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30717089
StefanHRT (2022-03-15 09:57:42+00:00): Hallo Konrad, ob nun path mit einem inkludierten yes oder Fußweg mit einem gesetzten yes macht hier keinen Unterschied. (Fußweg hat ein foot=designated somit haben Fußgänger Vorrang). Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere war dort eigentlich auch nirgendwo eine Radfreigabe und der Fußweg gehört zu einer privaten Wohnanlage--> das bicycle=yes wäre rechtlich gesehen auch mehr ein destination)
Neuwessi11 (2022-03-15 10:05:59+00:00): Der Unterschied wäre der Vorrang. Wie Du geschrieben hast: Bei einem Fußweg hätten die Fußgänger Vorrang, bei einem path mit 2x yes wären sie gleichberechtigt. Ich finde, dass man versuchen sollte, diese Unterschiede abzubilden.
Deshalb meine Frage: Ich meine mich zu erinnern, dass an der Stelle Fuß und Rad gleichberechtigt sind, kann mich aber auch täuschen (und komme wahrscheinlich erst Ende Mai dort wieder vorbei).
Was die Radfreigabe angeht: Da bin ich mir relativ (aber nicht zu 100%) sicher, dass dort irgendwo blaue Schilder mit einem Fahrrad drauf stehen.
Da Du aber auch nicht 100%ig sicher wirkst, würde ich vorschlagen, den Hinweis erstmal zur Erinnerung noch offenzulassen, bis das jemand vor Ort nochmal kontrolliert hat.
StefanHRT (2022-03-15 11:05:04+00:00): Von mir aus kann der Hinweis gerne offen bleiben. Der Parkplatz und die Zufahrt samt Schranke ist aber meines Wissens nach Privatgelände und das yes für alle an der Schranke demzufolge falsch. Was Du mit den blauen Schildern meinst gilt wenn dann für den Mauerweg selbst (dann könnte aber noch ein entsprechendes Traffic_sign an die Wege), der führt durch die Grünanlage und nicht über die Wohnanlage ;) Ach übrigens, wenn ich mir die Fotos auf Mapillary anschaue, dann ist dies eindeutig Privatgelände und passt zu meinen Erinnerungen
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-15 09:24:18+00:00): Edycja wycofana bo nie ma nawet śladu podania czemu klasyfikacja dróg jest zmieniana
nevw (2022-03-15 11:24:28+00:00): The shopping centre is a simple outline and there is no need for a relation.
Why don’t you join the two section and delete the relation.
I expect it is the iD editor that does this type of stupid creation of relations.
nevw (2022-03-15 22:53:12+00:00): I changed this to a simple polygon
abakus_uploader (2022-03-15 23:31:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2022-05-20 15:41:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-03-16 15:06:52+00:00): Hello (again)! What is the meaning of the tag list:fmm_0002 = yes?
Garabus (2022-03-27 16:54:26+00:00): Bonjour,

Suivant la BD TOPO, vous situez le Caïre de Saint Sauveur à la côte 1319, sur la crête descendant de la cime de Tuor vers la Vésubie, mais ce toponyme désigne en fait le sommet rocheux (altitude 1259 m)  situé un peu plus bas sur la même crête (sources : usages locaux, carte IGN 1950).
jcr83 (2022-03-27 19:56:28+00:00): Bonsoir,
Merci pour votre remarque. J'ai corrigé.
Pourriez-vous signaler le problème à l'IGN ? C'est possible sur cette page :
https://espacecollaboratif.ign.fr/
user_5359 (2022-03-16 14:36:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040460568. What is the meaning of the tag iy=farmyard?
mavl (2022-05-20 15:41:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Patr1k_P (2022-03-17 14:28:46+00:00): cesticka by mala byt pripojena k nejakej komunikacii, takto samostatne je to zle...navyse je tam zbytocna a lepsie by bolo ju zmazat
mavl (2022-05-20 15:41:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 16:30:04+00:00): Aldwark, not Aldfield STW, surely?