piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yaswap (2019-05-23 07:15:53+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. The Un-maintained track road was drawn 2 years ago. There is no enough resource to check whether it is really a track road or not. The pavement around Dyer Engineering looks paved and it is an industrial building. So the editor drew service roads from Un-Maintained track and just added Motor vehicle access=yes as the vehicles can bee seen from the aerial imagery.

Please let us know if there is any better edit so that we can change it accordingly.

Regards,
yaswap.
freebeer (2019-05-29 20:22:46+00:00): a track road provides access to agricultural fields or forest, while it is pretty clear that this is all industry and so should be re-tagged differently here.

the imagery shows the so-called track has the same surface as the added service drive, passes through a parking/loading/whatever area just as a service drive and in fact reaches the highway again, likely through a gate, with a second highway access again west over a similar concrete surface.

there is another track mapped southwest which is far more suitable, those more like farmhouses to my eyes, even if the track surface there does not meet the standards of construction found near me over a variety of surfaces, the worst case being the unmapped track heading north off the mapped track over grass.
yaswap (2019-05-30 15:22:47+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for suggesting. We will change the track road to service road. But there are many roads drawn in this area as track roads even though it is not going through fields/forests. Actually adding unpaved to the roads will be correct fix. Once again thanks for the suggestion. 

We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
yaswap.
skquinn (2019-05-22 20:13:40+00:00): Please consider writing more descriptive changeset comments so we can tell what you actually changed: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
arivenid (2019-07-09 07:57:06+00:00): Hi adiatma IRM-RV,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the 

"way 691571369
way 329603302"

classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise.

Thanks in advance.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-07-09 08:20:07+00:00): This way leading to private area that not residential. So I will leave it as is.
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-22 12:57:28+00:00): The wiki documentation instructs that the building and road should share nodes at the start/end points of the passage. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel#tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage

Please could you be more specific about the imagery_used tag. It is unclear what you actually used for this changeset.
yaswap (2019-05-23 06:58:47+00:00): Hi,

The building passages were added as per the ground truth. We followed the same as most of the mappers in UK are following. And yes it is mentioned in wiki that the way and building should share the nodes at entry/exit. We will edit it as per your suggestion and continue the same for the future edits. 

Please let us know if there is anything else that can improve the quality of edits. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
yaswap.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-16 13:52:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691572908/history



You added shop=restaurant there.

Have you intended to map a restaurant?

Or place selling equipment for restaurants?

Or something else?
Math1985 (2019-05-22 08:11:46+00:00): Bedankt voor de nieuwe import!
Jakka (2019-05-23 15:38:04+00:00): Better adding this recycling:glass_bottles=yes/no glass alone window glass ?
user_5359 (2019-05-25 14:41:48+00:00): Hello! Short question to node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3838724661: What is the meaning of the tag Zazie=Skymm?
Aury88 (2019-05-25 17:18:39+00:00): thank you. one of my friend have done a stupid  joke to me but I think he inserted that string in the wrong place :/
It has no meaning in OSM
thank you again
viloan (2019-05-22 05:52:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
goedegazelle (2019-05-22 06:46:38+00:00): Je hebt het adres van Mergelland 50 verschoven naar de tuin van Gooiland 68, naar ik aanneem per ongeluk. Zulke fouten ontstaan vaak tijdens het verschuiven van de kaart.
Jan-Peter (2019-05-22 06:54:23+00:00): Oeps. Direct teruggezet. Zal er op letten om bij het verschuiven op gedeeltes van de kaart te klikken waar niks staat.
mavl (2019-05-22 17:07:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Нет в этом месте "гараж Тюмень". Пожалуйста, смотрите  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70139281
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-22 14:47:06+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-24 08:46:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6489908400/history - is shop=clothes best fitting?

Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Doutpost would fit better if that is place that has meagre supply of products (or none) but allows pick up of orderer products?
Traveller4x4 (2025-01-24 14:13:41+00:00): You are right. I have already corrected.
mavl (2019-11-08 18:30:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
PT-53 (2019-05-22 07:40:16+00:00): Hallo Andreas,
auch hier ist eine "unvollständige" Adresse angegeben.
Grüße
乌克兰移民 (2019-05-24 15:39:52+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/15BG9ocoOIkxlX5nON8fGrJ-DOKrEUd6P/view?usp=sharing
Gppes (2019-05-23 19:52:26+00:00): Hallo, darf man fragen, warum Du die Node fuer die Bar, die ich vor Kurzem auf disused gesetzt habe, geloescht hast? Lg, Gppes
Gppes (2019-05-24 15:20:06+00:00): Ich habe das Ding wieder zurueck geholt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70590241
ma-rt-in (2019-05-23 06:31:57+00:00): Moin,
Bitte prüfe deine Änderungen, laut PTNA hast du die Routenführung von der Lina 1 zerstört, vermutlich dann noch andere Linien betroffen.
Vg
Lightsider (2019-05-23 07:42:11+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, aus irgendeinem Grund hat GoMap die Ways aus den Relationen genommen, als ich sie geändert hatte. Ich habe es jetzt (siehe Changeset 70541127) hoffentlich wieder hergestellt.
ma-rt-in (2019-05-23 15:41:17+00:00): Danke für das Bearbeiten. Relation am besten nur mit JOSM anpacken, kann passieren weniger Fehler.
vg
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-22 12:50:43+00:00): Hi James, thanks for continuing to improve OpenStreetMap.
In other places I've noticed that a lot of the landuse=meadow you've been adding is actually landuse=farmland. It's only best to add landuse mapping if you know what it is. It also made it a bit tricky for me that I had to spend extra time dividing the areas into their individual fields.
-Gregory.
James Derrick (2019-05-22 18:09:23+00:00): Hi Gregory,

It is possible that a green field is farmland, or livestock seasonal, but is this at heart a difference in interpretation of tag definitions? 

These are areas I cycle and drive through so I feel I do know what the areas are constituted of.

Following the wiki definition, I've been using evidence such as grazing animals in a field or the absence of tractor compaction to set landuse=meadow, rather than ploughed areas set landuse=farmland. My intention is to differentiate between patterns of arable and livestock cultivation.

I accept that not all individual fields have been created as individual fields, however the boundaries are in my mapping in the case where blocks of visually similar cultivation are a single polygon. 

I feel my contribution speaks for itself as an improvement to the map, and as comment text is cold and rather prone to mis-interpretation, can I suggest moving a discussion on the best tagging strategy to talk-gb or tagging before making wholesale changes please?

Thanks,

James
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-24 09:27:01+00:00): I have always used farmland to be both crops and animal pastures. There was some but little support for tags like crop=yes or animal=*. Landuse=meadow I used for long grass, maybe flower meadows. I've tried to stick to this with other mappers around Newcastle & Durham. Mappers further afield seem to like it because you only have to know it's typical farmland from aerial imagery (it may also get used for both).

So I went to check the wording of the wiki, and turns out I was wrong. I was sure I couldn't be as wrong as it claimed, but the farmland wiki page was changed in November without discussion!!!
I'm not really sure what to make of that, other than I don't like it because it's caused disparity between mappers. Something to take to the mailing list.

I wasn't going to do any wholesale changes. I will only do stuff that I've walked past, where I'm doing enough extra detail such as stiles and fences/hedges. I'll try to stick with what existing landuse is, but will at least add enough tags so that it is known what the use is.
eggie (2019-05-22 07:02:09+00:00): .. en hier dus de commentaarregel steeds aanpassen.. bv naar verschoven adresnode teruggeplaatst.
Gr Eggie
goedegazelle (2019-05-22 07:10:26+00:00): Als ik je een paar tips mag geven:

1) "path" is de basisvorm voor alle paden. Hier mag iedere verkeersvorm gebruik van maken. Wanneer je er een voetpad van maakt dan mag er alleen nog worden gewandeld. Idem voor een fietspad, daar mag b.v. geen brommer meer rijden (maar in dit geval nog wel gewandeld). Daarom is het beter om standaard "path" te kiezen en alleen "footway" of "cycleway" als dat uitdrukkelijk staat aangegeven, meestal met een verkeersbord. Dit voorkomt dat verkeersvormen onnodig worden uitgesloten.

2) Het toevoegen van extra tags zoals wegdek en breedte heeft een grote meerwaarde. Het is aan een ieder om te bepalen hoever daarin te gaan (het verzamelen kan tijdrovend zijn) maar alle toegevoegde informatie is een verrijking.
stephankn (2020-09-06 08:47:26+00:00): way 691589061 is certainly not a 65 meter height building.
Also: they key to tag house-numbers is "addr:housenumber". Please use the right tags and not abuse the name tag. Please revisit this area and fix your tagging.
huramentzefix (2019-05-22 21:49:57+00:00): hi, please keep your change set in the smallest are possible. you are covering half of the planet with this.
whalerich (2019-05-23 03:43:38+00:00): hi, please explain why you are worried about the coverage area of my change set?
aquarix (2019-05-25 06:29:22+00:00): Hello whalerich, if you changeset is covering such a large area it is seen in the local history of many users, although there is no change in the area of the user. 
What I'm saying is it's just a bad style to make changes all over the world and then upload them as a single change. This is all the more true when these changes have no direct relation to each other.
A set of changes should cover a maximum of one country but not a number of continents.
Regards aquarix
Nmxosm (2019-05-22 07:56:31+00:00): Hallo jcrow,

du hast das Restaurant, das du erstellt hast mit Hausnummer 3 versehen, es aber in dem Gebäude mit Hausnummer 1 platziert. Wie passt das zusammen?

VlG Nmxosm
jcrow (2019-05-22 08:12:56+00:00): Ich habe es nicht dort platziert. Ich habe gerade die Adresse korrigiert. Es war verlegt, aber ich konnte nicht herausfinden, wie ich es mit der mobilen App bewegen sollte. Ich werde es jetzt entsprechend verschieben.
literan (2019-05-22 20:38:37+00:00): это уточняющий тег для точки перехода.  исправил, посмотрите
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
giggls (2019-11-22 10:27:01+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast "Crow River Tipi Camp" als Campingplatz angelegt.

Das führt jetzt dazu, dass er unter
https://camping.openstreetmap.de/
als unvollständig erfasst auftaucht.

Gehe ich richtig in der Annahme, dass es sich um http://www.indianerfreizeit.de/ handelt?

Wenn schon, dann bitte mindestens folgende tags ergänzen:
tents=yes
access=private
caravans=no

Denn eigentlich ist das nicht mal ein richtiger Campingplatz sondern eine fest installierte Event location.

Gruss

Sven
eggie (2019-05-22 07:43:29+00:00): Dag GP.. Dit zal wel een zelf aangemaakte adresnode zijn geweest. Wellicht dat de originele BAG adresnode ook nog ergens rondzwerft. 
Svp geen spatie in de postcode. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70503206
MVG, Eggie
eggie (2019-05-22 09:17:27+00:00): Info Roberto samengevoegd met BAG adresnode
eggie (2019-05-22 09:23:57+00:00): Simon Levelt idem.. info overgezet naar adresnode. 
Kijk even hoe je de openingsuren toevoegt. Gebruik deze tool. openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
eggie (2019-05-22 09:26:46+00:00): De foutenanalyse geeft nl nog een foutmelding bij de openingstijden.
Nmxosm (2019-05-22 07:54:36+00:00): Hallo jcrow,

bitte nutze vollständige URLs für den Website-Tag. In diesem Fall gehört ein https:// davor.

VlG Nmxosm
jcrow (2019-05-22 08:22:48+00:00): Okay, ich werde es korrigieren. Vielen Dank!
Nmxosm (2019-05-22 07:53:27+00:00): Hallo jcrow,

gehört der Mülleimer wirklich zur Hausnummer 27 oder steht der nur in der Nähe auf dem Bürgersteig. Bitte entferne in diesem Fall die Adresse wieder.

VlG Nmxosm
jcrow (2019-05-22 08:20:28+00:00): Ich habe es entfernt. Danke für Ihre Hilfe!
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-22 12:48:15+00:00): Hi Mike, thanks for continuing to help OpenStreetMap.

Don't forget to provide a comment when you save to explain what you're doing  and what your source was (e.g. edits while out with GPS recording, using local knowledge or Bing imagery).
More info is at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
abakus_uploader (2019-05-22 22:30:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-22 12:44:03+00:00): Please do not create massive changesets. Please read through the guidelines. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits
ForstEK (2019-05-22 16:00:19+00:00): Hi! I know. Here only typing mistakes were corrected, you can check all 36 objects for two minutes. What about bounding box, geometry wasn't changed.
Horza (2019-05-23 01:10:49+00:00): Why does way #158756819 have the traffic signals tag? It's a building
ForstEK (2019-05-23 05:21:11+00:00): I don't know, question for creator, he wrote "on field data", see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70066444
DaveF (2019-05-23 11:36:38+00:00): @ LivingWithDragons
This clearly wasn't an automated edit.
 ForstEK's intentions & reasons were clearly defined.
This edit clearly improved the quality of the database.
Please stop with the finger-wagging sanctimony.
Horza (2019-05-23 11:50:59+00:00): @ ForstEK
I cheated and looked at Google's street level imagery, there's a zebra crossing with what looks like a lighted sign above it. I assume they meant to tag that, which should probably be tagged crossing=uncontrolled
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-24 08:45:30+00:00): This changeset tells me something was changed in Canada, something was changed in Australia, and potentially somethings inbetween. It may or may not have changed anything in the UK.
This is why people stopped checking edits in their local area, and why it is difficult to identify new local mappers.

The code of conduct is against such action, and is not restricted to strictly "automated" edits.
DaveF (2019-05-24 09:08:50+00:00): There are more validating sites than this one. Please use them.

Adjudication of edits should be performed on quality not quantity.

How has this changseset been detrimental to the OSM database?
Horza (2019-05-25 05:15:05+00:00): Minor off topic, but what are the best validating sites for checking large changsets?

Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70596736

Overpass is really good for small changesets, but dies on anything above a certain size
ForstEK (2019-05-25 10:44:48+00:00): For example, try here: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70504353/

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMCha

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_viewer

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70504353

But main purpose is creating a good database with correct data, and when validating sites don't work correctly with such changesets, their developers should update them, this is not a problem of mappers. In my changeset you can simple see the history of every object in the main page due two-three minutes, you can also verify my changesets, my purpose is nope vandalism and mechanical edits, but is a upgrade and correct the data. I mean lets close this long discussion in comments, no more to prove here, if you want declare other ideas, please write in user' messages.
skquinn (2019-05-26 09:00:12+00:00): There is absolutely no reason a changeset bounding box should stretch across large portions of six continents. I see this when I browse changesets in and around Houston, TX, US, and it just gets in the way.
DaveF (2019-05-26 09:31:18+00:00): @skquinn
This is a failure to not update the way osm.org displays changeset data. It isn't a valid reason to not correct spelling errors. Please use the other, more detailed validation software listed* 
This is an Overpass Turbo query which lists all edits around Houston, excluding yours: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JlI

Please remember the goal is to improve the map quality. All else is secondary.  

* There's also http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/ but it appears to be down ATM. Hopefully it'll be resurrected.
skquinn (2019-05-26 20:33:03+00:00): I have no issue with you correcting spelling errors. I do have an issue with you lumping changes across the entire planet into one changeset, giving a huge middle finger to accepted practice on OSM in the process. Overpass Turbo is slower and uses more computing power best used for other queries that can't be done using the history button.
ForstEK (2019-05-27 06:22:23+00:00): http://shtosm.ru/all/no-bag-thanks/
DaveF (2019-05-27 12:57:49+00:00): @skquinn

Your basing your argument on one piece of antiquated software. There were no edits in Houston so your last sentence is contradictory as it's self evident "that it can't be done using the history button."
skquinn (2019-05-27 22:30:30+00:00): @DaveF that's exactly the problem. The bounding box covers the entire planet including most of the US, including my hometown where there are no edits. There is no reason to not split this up into separate changesets, say, one per country.
DaveF (2019-05-27 22:55:38+00:00): Please stop ignoring the solutions you've been provided with.
skquinn (2019-05-28 03:58:36+00:00): I am aware of the other tools to view OSM changesets. Honestly, most of the time I prefer to use the history button as it's always available and not on some other site I have to bookmark and copy/paste location info to. I am not ignoring your so-called "solutions". I am acknowledging them, and at the same time rejecting them as unacceptable. It's like asking me to wear earplugs because I can't stand the noise of someone belching loudly at the dinner table.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-03-04 03:19:04+00:00): Hi Angys..

on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691601797, I change it to unclassified since the road function is connecting the industrial cluster building.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-22 12:28:29+00:00): why was this deleted?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-22 12:27:48+00:00): again, not keeping the oldest element in OSM.
s8evq (2019-05-27 13:28:33+00:00): Beste FrDs, wat is de bron van deze naamwijziging?
FrDs (2019-05-27 19:27:09+00:00): Officiële kaart Toerisme Oost-Vlaanderen wandelnetwerk 'Meetjeslandse bossen' (https://www.toerismemeetjesland.be/nl/meetjeslandse-bossen)
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 16:05:04+00:00): Hello,
It looks like your addition of motor_vehicle=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691605434/history has some of the same issues that have been commented about elsewhere (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8476275 ).  What was your source for adding this tag here?
Best Regards,
Andy
mrfa (2019-07-09 11:26:22+00:00): Hi Andy,

As per your suggestion the  motor_vehicle=yes that was added to the track roads have been reverted. I checked all these type of edits and reverted wherever necessary. Thanks for your insights.

Regards,
mrfa
SomeoneElse (2019-07-09 11:43:42+00:00): Hello mrfa,
Thanks for that.
Best Regards,
Andy
literan (2019-05-22 20:39:09+00:00): и тут исправил
oba510 (2019-05-26 05:24:09+00:00): Golden Gate Fields was already on the map, with a lot more detail than the area you drew. (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1709346 ). If you were trying to draw an area encompassing the entire complex, it covers a much larger area and wouldn't be tagged as a track; that would only apply to the actual racing track itself.
eggie (2019-05-22 09:01:07+00:00): Op de OFM routeert het wel omdat er een fietsroute overheen loopt. 
highway=footway wordt gezien als onverhard. Dus je kunt een surfacetag toevoegen surface=paved  b.v.
Ites is een footway als er een rond blauw bord met de wandelaar met kind staat. In alle andere gevallen taggen we highway=path surface=?
Waarom bus=yes hier? 
highway=platform komt me inderdaad vreem over.
Is het hier een fietsvoetveer en hoort er wellicht motor_vehicle=no op. moped=yes en mofa=yes? 
Op de veerroute zelf staat access=no  Dat is bijna altijd fout. Dat is het bord Verboden toegang voor alle verkeer access=no moet er dus af.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-22 09:04:20+00:00): advies... maak van die stukjes naar het water highway=path met surface=?
bus=yes???  verwijderen.
Op de veerroute zelf access=no verwijderen.
moped en mofa=yes toevoegen als die vervoermiddelen zijn toegestaan.
Gr Eggie
Jan Wollring (2019-05-22 09:13:01+00:00): Ik routeer met OpenRouteService, en dat ging niet goed. Ik ga je aanbevelingen overnemen. Ik heb ook even gekeken in de eigenschappen van het voetveer bij Rheden, daar stond inderdaad access=yes.
Leo Slager (2019-05-22 09:17:36+00:00): De echte boosdoener is hier highway= platform. Dat routeert nooit.
terwijl ik bezig was eea uit te vogelen en te wijzigen, kwam ondertussen de reactie van Eggie.
Maandag even checken of het nu wel routeert.