piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:30:55+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
comfyquiettree (2021-02-22 08:45:34+00:00): Nebylo by lepší kdyby byla venkovní tělocvična jako area?
Jiri Podhorecky (2021-02-22 10:34:36+00:00): možná že ano, nemam na to vyhraněný názor. Je to 6 samostatných strojů.
comfyquiettree (2021-02-22 20:37:36+00:00): Také nevím, ale asi to ponechám tak jak je to teď, dovoluje nám to alespoň lépe otagovat jednotlivá stanoviště :)
ovruni (2021-02-19 20:16:22+00:00): Hola, he notado que ha ingresado en algunas de sus ediciones etiquetas wikidata y wikipedia. Sin embargo los valores deben de ser sobre el geoglifo, un articulo como es el caso de https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigante_de_Atacama
Saludos
c tito young (2021-02-22 05:03:40+00:00): Thank you for this.. I deleted the "Wikilink" information and ill only use it accordingly.
Glassman (2021-02-20 02:41:34+00:00): #TIP: Use Snohomish Counties SCOPI to get street names. Just remember we spell out street names instead of abbreviations.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNH-q8MFo0E

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99614955
pitscheplatsch (2021-02-22 15:34:38+00:00): Just a test?
Glassman (2021-02-20 02:38:21+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99615173
marc__marc (2021-03-26 09:55:18+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908890504
c'est un nouveau rond-point qui remplace celui situé 50m plus au sud ou c'est un doublon ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Pa413 (2021-03-26 11:48:15+00:00): Bonjour Marc,

justement je ne sais pas !

Je remet juste à jour les lignes de bus du coin mais j’avoue que je suis coincé sur cette zone. 

Cordialement 
Pa413
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
tkoval83 (2021-02-19 22:35:18+00:00): Привіт, зміщення по всій М-06 дорозі зроблено доволі точно. Не достатньо тільки по GPS трекам робити зміщення так як вони дають похибку на рівні 5 ментів. Навяне зміщення робилося на основі як GPS так і співставлення їх з фотографіями з Mapillary так що трек накладався на смугу руху авто як на фото.
Тому будь ласка відкотіть зміни
Domkot_UA (2021-02-20 18:44:25+00:00): Привіт,
Не маю підстав заперечувати точність ненесення М-06, тому вважаю ваше обурення слушним. Усі свої зміни по М-06 скасую, дякую

Намагатимусь в подальшому не допускати таких помилок.
philippec (2021-02-22 22:54:18+00:00): Geveltuin Bonheiden.  Ik begrijp de beschrijving niet.
philippec (2021-02-22 22:54:30+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gHr6kCQJapVWncg3OEe-gg
hoserab (2021-02-19 22:24:11+00:00): Hello Mahsa,

This building was demolished last year, it no longer exists. I deleted it from the map three days ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99408157). I have summarily deleted it from the map again. Please note the age of the aerial imagery you are using for reference; it is sometimes out of date.

Thanks
RicoElectrico (2021-02-19 21:52:33+00:00): This edit was undiscussed with the Polish community. I reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99618902 . Please cease these mass edits done without community approval (use https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 to discuss it beforehand).
skyper (2021-05-12 01:22:51+00:00): Salli L1nu53
Auch hier die Frage nach "shared_lane" und "cycleway:lane=pictogram".
Z.B https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30246825

Was willst Du ausdrücken?
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
okwithmydecay (2023-02-01 12:56:47+00:00): Whilst cycling through here, I noticed that the proposed one way has now been introduced
MacLondon (2023-02-02 00:14:16+00:00): Although there's a kind of one-way is in play around here, it's only due to 'no entry' signs rather than actual one-way signs.

e.g. One-way signs were put in for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997686334 but the rest of Wellington Row (as with the 'false one-way' for motorists on Colombia Rd) is only 'no entry'.

This is all complicated by the Mayor of Tower Hamlets wanting to rip out the changes made around here.
aquarix (2021-03-12 17:57:44+00:00): Hallo 9ix,
mir ist aufgefallen, dass du in diesem Changeset an drei Stellen die beiden Streckengleise verklebt hast. Ich nehme mal an das war keine Absicht deswegen habe ich das auf die Schnelle mal repariert.
Siehe Changesets 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100923609
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100923894
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100924058
Gruß aquarix
9ix (2021-03-13 21:12:28+00:00): Dank Dir!  :-)
eggie (2021-02-19 21:10:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. Feedback: De info heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode. Dat zou eigenlijk met de andere winkels ook kunnen. 


MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
gscscnd (2021-02-20 08:50:32+00:00): Do kilku domów raczej highway=residential.
Jan'ek (2021-02-20 10:35:05+00:00): Podjazd do miejsca zamieszkania lub przedsiębiorstwa to:  "highway=service + service=driveway". A "highway=residential" - nie znalazłem w opisie.
gscscnd (2021-02-20 10:47:14+00:00): Tak, ale tutaj mamy drogę (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908899999), która prowadzi do kilku gospodarstw. highway=service ujdzie ale residential moim zdaniem byłoby lepsze.

Jeśli chodzi o opisy w edytorze iD, to highway=residential to „Droga lokalna” w grupie „Pozostałe drogi”.

Zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dresidential> i <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dservice>.
Jan'ek (2021-02-26 20:01:09+00:00): Wnioskuję, że droga do więcej niż jednego domu to raczej highway=residential i niezależnie od długości i nawierzchni. Już miałem zapytać o nazwę ale "name" w opisie jest opcjonalne - to ma sens.
gscscnd (2021-02-26 20:41:13+00:00): Jeżeli droga nie ma nazwy, to można dodać tag noname=yes. Najlepiej sprawdzić to na miejscu.
Jan'ek (2021-02-27 20:20:00+00:00): Już poprawiłem, jest tam tabliczka miejska, że też Główna 82-96.
Przy okazji mam pytanie: ostatnimi czasy wchodzę na mapę z "samotnymi" adresami http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy/#11/50.2250/18.6129  i koryguje zazwyczaj błędy w niepełnej nazwie dróg lub adresów. Chciałbym wiedzieć jak działa ta strona i kiedy jest odświeżana by sprawdzić rezultaty poprawek.
gscscnd (2021-02-27 20:41:07+00:00): Zajrzyj na <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=812004#p812004> (6 postów). Jak to działa jest opisane w pierwszym poście: <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=389016#p389016>.
hoserab (2021-02-24 23:06:15+00:00): I have rolled back all of the road tagging here, once again. Your reclassifications were incorrect. Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Calgary#Road_tagging_guidelines for more information, and please desist making more of these changes until you have had a chance to more thoroughly review what these classifications actually mean.

Please note that if you are unsure about your changes you can mark them for review by more experienced contributors by clicking the "I would like someone to review my edits" checkbox.

Thanks
Friendly_Ghost (2021-02-20 19:57:11+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your contributions. Could you please make your buildings rectangular? Thank you in advance.
TonyMTB (2021-02-22 16:06:36+00:00): Пожарных гидрантов тут нет и не было.
dvdhoven (2021-02-20 07:31:52+00:00): Ik heb de sortering van rcn route 09-34 en rwn route 13-18 hersteld.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2021-02-20 08:37:04+00:00): Beste Multichill  Kijk eens naar editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710     

Dan kun je wel veilig  wegen opknippen.    

 In de fietskaartlayer kun je o.a zien of er routerelaties lopen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.4160/4.6508&layers=C

Met editor iD zullen keer op keer de routes ondanks alle goede bedoelingen venield worden. 

MVG
eggie
multichill (2021-02-20 11:34:38+00:00): Dank voor het oplossen.
Misschien moet ik daar maar eens naar kijken.
eggie (2021-02-20 11:37:38+00:00): Zeker doen.. Overigens heeft Dick van den Hooven het opgelost. Die heeft er dagwerk aan.
Mvg
Eggie
DressyPear4 (2021-02-21 20:17:50+00:00): Olá, áreas genérias não devem ser adicionadas no mapa.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99617272
Larvikite (2021-02-19 21:16:25+00:00): Hi. I made a mistake. This path does in fact exist. Please ignore this Changeset!
parsd51 (2021-02-20 15:18:56+00:00): Hi

Good you flagged it.
I have reverted the changeset.

Greetings
parsd51
b-holdet (2021-04-22 13:09:11+00:00): Why is this point created in the water?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8439312396
osmviborg (2021-04-22 13:50:47+00:00): Er det ikke her det er galt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495963816
b-holdet (2021-04-22 13:54:21+00:00): Jo, men er punktet med cykelstien opstået fordi området er forstørret og dermed fulgt med ud i vandet
mtmail (2021-04-22 15:30:09+00:00): Could have happened when I created https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12339920 The relation is very big and hard to edit. I'll fix it.
mtmail (2021-04-22 17:15:03+00:00): Fixed with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103423074 but the map takes a long time to display the changes.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-20 19:16:25+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good. It would be good to confirm if the part of the old runway still in the airport area is now a taxiway.
datendelphin (2021-02-20 09:03:38+00:00): Also path ist etwa das selbe wie footway. footway wäre foot=designated, also das blaue Fussgänger Schild. Wobei das aber nur von wenigen mappern beachtet wird.
tobh (2021-02-20 09:09:41+00:00): Ok. Soll ich es wieder auf Path ändern? Ich hatte es erst als path und dann doch auf footway geändert, da die anderen Wege gleicher Art in der Gegend footway sind (ursprünglich war es unmaintained tracks, was falsch ist)
tobh (2021-02-20 09:12:55+00:00): Zur genaueren Beschreibung: Es ist ein Trampelpfad der als Wanderweg ausgewiesen ist und es hat ein Verbotsschild für Fahrräder.
datendelphin (2021-02-20 09:18:28+00:00): Das passt so, keine Sorge. Wollte das nur kurz anmerken als ich das changeset sah, die path/footway redundanz ist immer etwas verwirrend.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-23 23:19:05+00:00): please dont add personal information
RicoElectrico (2021-02-19 21:52:16+00:00): This edit was undiscussed with the Polish community. I reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99618902 . Please cease these mass edits done without community approval (use https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 to discuss it beforehand).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
ALu68 (2021-02-22 22:02:36+00:00): Sat-Thu: 0800-1400 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8439302156 see here the rules for opening hours: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
marc__marc (2021-03-09 06:18:40+00:00): Bonjour,
les arbres ont une plaque avec toutes les informations ? woaw c'est super !
Cordialement,
Marc
defuneste (2021-03-09 06:49:07+00:00): Hello, 

Non malheureusement mais j'habite à trois rues et je vais au parc juste au bout de la rue. 

Les données viennent du services des espaces verts et je les importe quand j'ai le temps à la main en verifiant que c'est pas ultra mauvais (ce qui est possible). 

J'ai décris la moulinette de donnée ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Les_arbres_de_la_ville_de_Saint-%C3%89tienne

Bonne journée
RicoElectrico (2021-02-19 21:52:39+00:00): This edit was undiscussed with the Polish community. I reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99618902 . Please cease these mass edits done without community approval (use https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 to discuss it beforehand).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
RicoElectrico (2021-02-19 21:52:44+00:00): This edit was undiscussed with the Polish community. I reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99618902 . Please cease these mass edits done without community approval (use https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 to discuss it beforehand).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
dvdhoven (2021-02-20 07:08:58+00:00): Ik heb rcn route 22-23 hersteld. Door het werken met ID is het risico groot dat routerelaties stuk gaan.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
ALu68 (2021-02-22 22:00:22+00:00): See here the harbour features: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Harbour
gscscnd (2021-02-20 08:53:57+00:00): Zaktualizuj maxspeed:type. Ograniczenia do 60 zostały zniesione?
felipeeugenio (2021-02-20 17:46:12+00:00): Hola Alonso. En el sector de Minas del Prado hay claramente un sector que es forest. hasta se ven los caminos de las forestales. Si quieres dedicarte a esto tienes que aprender la diferencia. Por favor revisar la zona de Concepcíon. En la cordillera de Nahuelbuta se han hecho cosas interesantes. Hasta el momento estás dibujando plastas para rellenar sin el menor detalle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99618798
felipeeugenio (2021-02-20 17:48:18+00:00): Hola Alonso. por favor dime que esto no lo hiciste después de que me preguntaste si acaso esto era scrub. Es demasiado grande, no hay caso de que sea solo una cosa. 
Lo que tienes que hacer, para no perder el tiempo dibujando cosas que después están mal y terminas encariñándote, es dedicarte a, por ejemplo, scrub. Y mapeas solo eso. en partes pequeñas. Luego de eso das una pincelada de otra cosa. Pero esto está definitivamente mal.

Por favor vuelve a revisar Telegram. hay maperos que quieren ayudarte, pero tienes que poder de tu parte.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99618798
marc__marc (2022-08-02 21:44:00+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8439381102
pourriez-vous vérifier la position de cet arbre ? faut-il le bouger hors du batiment ou a-t-il été abatu pour laisser place au batiment ?
Cordialement,
Marc
defuneste (2022-08-02 21:54:32+00:00): Bonjour, Je ne suis pas sur place mais j'irais verifier mi aout et corrigerais au besoin! Merci!
 Le tag leaf_cycle=deciduous and evergreen peut aussi être attribué pour un genre donné (et pas une essence) et donc à ce niveau un genre peut avoir les deux (ex Quercus ilex et Quercus robur).si ce n'est plus bon il nous faut corriger le wiki.
ZeLonewolf (2021-04-01 23:34:50+00:00): Are you aware that you added a building in California to a water relation in New York? :)
skifans (2021-03-08 19:39:15+00:00): Hi,
Do you think this is better with the highway tag? The old Bridleway ford is not visible or passable at all today. It isn't possible to cross the river here apart from on the stepping stones, even though it is an official PROW it is in no way useable.

I've seen a few places elsewhere which had just the designation tag without the highway tag and thought that sounded reasonable. Examples:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299983292

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238892290

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304639980

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356914963

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356914956

Or maybe an abandoned:highway or disused:highway might be appropriate? That said I'm still not sure either of those are great as it isn't really visible.
skifans (2021-04-20 19:52:48+00:00): Removed tag in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103292687
highflyer74 (2021-05-07 11:37:09+00:00): Moin!

In diesem Änderungssatz hattest Du das "Biotop Steinrieden" als Relation hinzugefügt. Es kommt hier zu Problemen, da Landuses aneinander liegen, die eigentlich keiner Relation bedürfen (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.79567&lat=52.76641&zoom=18). Ich würde das gern verbessern und brauche von Dir die Information, ob es sich dabei um ein Schutzgebiet handelt und wenn ja, welcher Art. Dann würde man es komplett anders erfassen.

Melde Dich gern direkt hier im Changeset. Danke!
highflyer74 (2021-05-18 12:48:30+00:00): Moin! Ich hatte Dich hier vor knapp zwei Wochen angeschrieben, aber leider noch keine Antwort bekommen. Könntest Du Dir obigen Text einmal anschauen, und mir kurz Rückmeldung geben? Danke!
NGL-engel (2021-06-01 12:05:18+00:00): Hallo highflyer74, 
   ich hatte leider in der letzten Zeit meinen Maileingang etwas vernachlässigt und darum deine Mail nicht gelesen, sorry. 

Zum Thema, es handelt sich um eine privat angelegtes Biotop. Eine kleiner Teich (Tümpel), davor eine Wiese die oft vom Teich überschwemmt wird. An drei Seiten ein Gebüschstreifen mit Bäumen.
Ich denke nicht das es ein offizielles Schutzgebiet ist, aber es steht ein kleines Holzschild dran. 

Ich hoffe das hilft Dir weiter, ansonsten nochmal melden (ich werde meinen Maileingang im Auge behalten)

Gruß, NGL-engel
...und nochmals Entschuldigung wegen der verspäteten Antwort
Pollux17 (2021-03-14 14:57:06+00:00): Ciao vedo che sei un nuovo mapper, benvenuto su OSM! Sono contento che la val Brembana stia ricevendo un maggiore interesse

Ho visto che hai fatto delle aggiunte a Lenna che potrebbero avere qualche problema di tag, per la precisione queste
Pollux17 (2021-03-14 14:57:19+00:00): 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908919535
Mi sembra difficile che a Lenna ci sia uno zoo, forse altri tag andrebbero meglio

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908919534
Qui bicycle=designated è già sottointeso da highway=cycleway, si può togliere

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908919532
Questo è più un dettaglio, il nome del parco è un nome ufficiale/usato dalle persone o è stato solo aggiunto perchè descrittivo? Il nome non è obbligatorio, specie per piccoli parchi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8439435695
Questa panchina è su un punto che è parte di un percorso, sarebbe bene separarli

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908919529
Questo percorso si sovrappone a un bordo del parco, non è necessariamente sbagliato ma solitamente una migliore rappresentazione si ha mettendolo di poco dentro al parco
mueschel (2021-02-20 10:09:24+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!

you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.
Would you mind checking these tags and change them to documented ones? Let us (e.g. on the forums) know if you need help!
ALu68 (2021-02-22 21:48:29+00:00): Hello MVKhaled,

It is not just done by adding a comment like <<Tag Corrections (Please add these Tags as they are needed for technical details of an airport) >>

I have no doubt that the information is very important, but OSM is not the place to dump the data here.

For example "runway Length = 1200 Metres &
runway width = 30 Metres" are assigned to the runway, but in OSM syntax and not as free text https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Drunway

1. Read the wiki
2. Respect the rules of OSM.
Sammyhawkrad (2021-02-20 04:45:33+00:00): Only the building outline is to be mapped and tagged as building, don't include the compound of the building.

Review the edits you've made so far and keep this in mind for future edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99619403
aceman444 (2021-02-27 21:29:24+00:00): Hi, there is no shop at the road you placed this at (it is a private road to an underground parking). Also, you say alcohol delivery, but added a supermarket. So this looks quite wrong, what did you mean to add?
PartymakerSK (2021-02-28 07:50:13+00:00): Hi, yes there is private roud to undergroung parking, and at this parking we park our fleet for alcohol delivery and we have also storage. Im owner.  you can check www.donasac.sk
And  Yes sorry for add supermarket icon, i dont find shop icon. Change it please.
aceman444 (2021-02-28 12:44:14+00:00): Dakujem za info. Parkujete priamo na tej ceste, ci v tom podzemnom parkovisku? A kde mate ten sklad? V tom podzemnom parkovisku od byvalym Kyjevom? Mozu tam ludia nejako prist vyzdvihnut zasielku, alebo im objenavka z eshopu bude vzdy dorucena? Inak obchod s alkoholom je shop=alcohol ale vydajna je shop=outpost. Opravim to len mi skuste doplnit tie informacie. Dakujem.
PartymakerSK (2021-02-28 14:00:08+00:00): Parkujeme v podzemnom parkovisku a tam máme aj sklady v priestoroch Kyjeva.  Patrí nám ja LUNA BAR.  Vyzdvihnut objednávky k nám chodi kurier WOLT a Bolt (pre nich je to hlavne nech nás nájdu) .  A máme aj vlastných kurierov, ktorí to vozia.
aceman444 (2021-02-28 22:20:23+00:00): Dakujem. Ked si tam bezni zakaznici nemozu prist nieco kupit, nemalo by to byt v OSM ako 'shop'. Moze to byt sidlo firmy, alebo ako hovorite 'sklad' ale to velmi zaznacit nejde (ked je to len miestnost, nie cela budova). Ale nieco teda vyskusam.

Predpokladam ale, ze Wolt a Bolt sa s kazdou firmou dohodnu na presnych suradniciach a nemusia patrat po mapach. Inak potom na https://www.donasac.sk/contact mate nespravne orientacne cislo aj PSC, aspon inak ako ste dali do OSM.
marczoutendijk (2021-11-30 15:34:28+00:00): Hi,
You have here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778553724
farmland tagged with the name "Pond". Is that correct?
If there is a pond at that spot, then
natural=water + water=pond is all you need.
b-unicycling (2021-11-30 21:07:05+00:00): I'm following up on it with the owner of the land.
marczoutendijk (2022-10-24 13:30:52+00:00): Did you reach a conclusion yet?
b-unicycling (2022-10-25 11:31:54+00:00): No, sorry.
b-unicycling (2022-10-25 11:34:40+00:00): It looks like the stream is going through it and there might be a pond, so I've retagged a few things.
DareDJ (2023-08-23 09:46:52+00:00): It looks that name: "Dagbaple" is wrong for this village.
Can someone with local knowledge confirm this please?
map per (2021-03-30 06:36:54+00:00): Hello RunTrails,

although the Historical Park (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6077602) is called "park" it isn't a leisure=park in OSM and shouldn't be tagged as such.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark for the OSM definition of leisure=park.

Best wishes
map per