piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
patzi (2016-08-25 08:50:17+00:00): Ich habe es in dem Fall jetzt wieder auf die Fläche gesetzt, es ist insgesamt halt eine reine Wetterstation, und der Name ist in dem Fall auch Wetterwarte Göttingen siehe z.B. http://www.wzforum.de/forum2/read.php?31,3198823
Müszi (2016-09-18 12:42:45+00:00): Salut!

Ai schimbat tipul drumului care duce de la Gârda de Sus spre Ghețarul de la Scărișoara din highway=unclassified în highway=tertiary. În România highway=tertiary se folosește pentru drumurile comunale (DC), dar după cum știu, acest drum nu are număr (cu toate că este un drum asfaltat – am fost acolo de mai multe ori, ultima dată în 2016-09-04).

Dacă drumul are totuși un număr, ar trebui s-o indicăm pe hartă, dacă nu, să schimbăm tipul înapoi în highway=unclassified.

-- 
Zsolt
Self-Perfection (2016-08-15 22:51:42+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Что хотели отрезить в этой правке?

Мне кажется некорректным применять тег natural=spring к точке впадения какого-то тока воды в водоём.
MosKartograf (2016-08-18 15:33:49+00:00): Апеллирую к фото http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dspring
Пластмассовый каптаж в камне при сравнении с фото куда более весомый случай. Источники капитально оформленные, регулярные и даже не сезонные.
Andreas Binder (2016-08-15 18:04:17+00:00): Changesetkommentar sollte "Details nach Vorbeifahrt" heißen
literan (2016-08-16 15:58:25+00:00): Не надо исправлять в точке только имя, оставляя остальные теги от старого ресторана! Лучше не трогайте ничего, чем так - только усиливаете хаос. Напишите заметку, что здесь такой-то ресторан сменился на другой - другие качественно исправят.
GerdP (2017-08-26 09:08:34+00:00): Moin!
Mir ist aufgefallen, das Du gelegentlich Objekte mit highway=turning_circle wie dieses erzeugst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437345862#map=19/51.30286/6.59065
Passiert offensichtlich aus Versehen, aber vielleicht kannst Du mal drauf achten. Oder ist das doch Absicht?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rgv
mitchelllllllll (2016-08-15 18:27:47+00:00): De kaart is aangepast, opgeschoond en klaar om geprint te worden.
jeka p (2016-08-20 12:58:19+00:00): Hallo! ich war heute vor Ort - ich habe keine Schilder gesehen mit dem Verbot durch die Schützenstrasse zu fahren. Habe die access restrictions entsprechend gelöscht. Gewisse turn-restrictions habe ich auch gelöscht - die waren nicht mehr relevant.

Gruss,
Jeka
mausmaki (2016-08-23 17:27:42+00:00): Wegen des Umbaus war sie gesperrt, habe vergessen, sie zu entfernen.😁
Danke
literan (2016-09-19 17:11:24+00:00): hospital это больница с крупным стационаром. Амбулатория это doctors или clinic, возвращаю обратно
user_5359 (2016-08-15 19:24:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
spiculalinguae (2016-08-15 19:26:08+00:00): i don't know how to mark a peak/mountain, and your page does not offer instructions on how to do so.
richlv (2016-08-16 04:13:04+00:00): please note that the edits you make with the maps.me application are uploaded to a global, public database :)
you can have your own local favourite list by clicking on the 'star' icon ("save")
literan (2016-08-16 16:19:08+00:00): да что вы эти Океи плодите, уже третий раз добавляете
felipeeugenio (2017-05-02 15:50:42+00:00): Estimado.
Building es para las estructuras, no para los recintos. por favor no reversar los cambios. saludos y gracias por las ediciones
redrace (2017-05-13 05:16:40+00:00): HUHU
Magst Du das Maislabyrinth entfernen! Hier wächst jetzt Getreide!
Euskirchener (2017-05-13 10:00:52+00:00): Hi redrace, danke fürs aufmerksame Beobachten der Umgebung hier. Ich habe das Maislabyrinth vorerst entfernt (mit dem Lifecycle-Tagging habe ich die History der Fläche erhalten). Vielleicht entsteht dieses Jahr hier wieder ein neues. Da dort eine meiner Fahrradrouten lang vorbei führt, werde ich auch regelmäßig über den aktuellen Stand informiert.

Viele Grüße, CorrectMapper
Polarbear (2016-09-14 09:57:38+00:00): Hi, the abbrevation LGBT might not be well understood. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre#Target_groups and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/community_centre:for#values fore alternatives.
Polarbear (2016-09-15 09:18:10+00:00): cool, thanks for the fix.
Maanya (2016-08-16 05:54:43+00:00): Hey MAJID-N,

Your efforts in adding data into OSM is deeply appreciated. However, could you please let us know any reason behind you deleting the road in this area. 
Thank you very much.

Regards,
Maanya
AMDmi3 (2016-08-15 20:53:36+00:00): В названия улиц и addr:street не должно быть никакх приписок (типа "СНТ Дружба")
literan (2016-08-16 16:08:00+00:00): я просил не писать капсом, вы не слушаете. Откатываю.
Hjart (2016-08-15 20:52:04+00:00): Pas på med ikke at rykke ved adresser når du panner. Her har du fået rodet Elleygade ind i Kongegade 94.
Hjart (2016-08-15 21:01:28+00:00): Og der skulle stå Elleygade 21
Preben V Knudsen (2016-08-17 15:50:48+00:00): Ja det er ikke så godt - må se hvordan jeg for det lavet tilbage igen ....
Hjart (2016-08-17 15:53:17+00:00): Jeg har før med held brugt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Level0 til det
MKnight (2016-08-16 09:20:43+00:00): ich habe mal das tagging etwas konkretisiert und "name" entfernt. 

Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
Cavit (2016-08-15 21:00:08+00:00): Note that opening hours on their website are out of date.
letihu (2016-08-24 10:32:18+00:00): Schade, dass hier viele Nodes doppelt hochgeladen wurden. Josm ist wohl abgeschmiert ;-)
z. B. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4351742666/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4351742384/history
olvagor (2016-08-24 19:16:35+00:00): Ja, ist mir tatsächlich abgeschmiert und das mit den doppelten Punkten hab ich zu spät gemerkt. Hab versucht, die zu bereinigen aber nicht systematisch. Das hol ich mal für dieses Changeset nach, zumindest soweit das Plugin damit zurechtkommt.
olvagor (2016-08-24 19:24:58+00:00): Ich hab jetzt keine doppelten Punkte mehr gefunden, daher glaub ich, dass das schon gefixt war
letihu (2016-08-24 20:32:05+00:00): Ja, ich habe dort schon aufgeräumt ;-)
ivanbranco (2022-01-05 16:25:44+00:00): Hi olvagor,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4351742367

there's an invalid place value here, can you check it out?
Alecs01 (2016-08-22 10:25:29+00:00): Please do not create fake objects, this is a map of the real world
user_5359 (2016-08-16 16:02:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2553978256 ? I Think you node is a duplicate, please check this and merge the nodes (if necessary).
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-15 22:57:25+00:00): Não precisa dessa gambiarra toda hahahah
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-15 23:02:57+00:00): No waze essa rua Professor Nogueira é mão única em toda sua extensão do Norte para o sul.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-15 23:03:10+00:00): O que acha?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-15 23:15:23+00:00): Coloquei ela como mão única e tirei as restrições.
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-15 23:15:45+00:00): Se for mão única, não precisa da gambiarra. Esse cruzamento fica perto aqui de casa e amanhã vou passar por lá para conferir.
Tem outro cruzamento na mesma situação: Jovita Feitosa com Carvalho Mota.
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-15 23:16:26+00:00): Se for mão dupla, tem outra forma de fazer?
Eu ia escrever para a lista Talk-Br amanhã perguntando.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-15 23:21:07+00:00): Outra coisa, no Waze não existe nenhuma restrição na área desse cruzamento aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437376311/history

Tem certeza que tem aquelas restrições que vc colocou?
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-15 23:26:56+00:00): Eu passei por lá hoje e vi proibições de retorno, mas estava com pressa e não pude parar para ver qual era a rua. Talvez você consiga ver algo no Google Street View.
santamariense (2016-08-16 00:01:30+00:00): @Jakson Aquino. Não se pode extrair dados de imagens do Google Street View. Eles tem "todos os direitos reservados".
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-16 00:12:23+00:00): @santamariense. Obrigado por avisar! Mas não se preocupe porque eu moro próximo da região em discussão, embora não seja meu caminho habitual. Os lugares onde estou fazendo correções são por onde passo com frequência.
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-16 11:37:20+00:00): Estive há poucos minutos no cruzamento da Jovita Feitosa com Prof. Nogueira e confirmei que a Prof. Nogueira é mão única no sentido Norte-Sul no trecho que corta a Jovita Feitosa.
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-16 11:50:31+00:00): Da forma como está o cruzamento no mapa, o retorno é permitido, o que contraria a proibição de retorno no local. Eu tirei uma foto quando estive lá:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByMBQcSs9G7KUllSa1VqRi1lUUk
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-16 22:46:29+00:00): A restrição existe com a Professor Nogueira ou com a Carvalho Mota? Sim, tem jeito de criar as restrições sem precisar da gambiarra.
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-16 23:19:48+00:00): A restrição a retorno existe nos dois cruzamentos e nos dois sentidos da Jovita Feitosa. A diferença é que a Prof. Nogueira é mão única e a Carvalho Mota é mão dupla. Acho que a intenção dos engenheiros era evitar impasse entre quem estivesse saindo de uma das ruas e quem estivesse fazendo retorno na avenida.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-20 17:52:25+00:00): REtirei as gambiarras com Caravalho Mota tbm. Então quem pode passar nesse trecho é só quem vem da carvalho mota? Quem está na Jovita não pode entrar nele?
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-20 18:25:47+00:00): Quem em um sentido da Jovita pode atravessar as duas faixas em sentido contrário para entrar na Carvalho Mota, mas não pode entrar em nenhuma das duas faixas de sentido contrário (ou seja, fazer retorno). Pelo menos, essa é minha interpretação porque a placa é de "Retorno proibido" e não "Proibido curva à esquerda". Sem a gambiarra, as ferramentas de cálculo de rota (openrouteservice.org e maps.me) vão sugerir o retorno. Mas entendo que é melhor sem a gambiarra porque o mapa fica desenhado como está na rua.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-22 19:59:28+00:00): Criei essas 3 restrições:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6522691
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6522692
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6522693

Veja se te atende.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-22 20:00:44+00:00): Ao invés tbm poderia ter sido criada restrições do tipo proibido a esquerda.
Jakson Aquino (2016-08-22 22:09:47+00:00): Olhei as três restrições no iD. Elas são representadas por uma seta azul. Muito interessante! Mas não sei se entendi. Está parecendo que há restrição total de entrar na Jovita Feitosa e restrição parcial para entrar na rua perpendicular. O certo seria entrada livre na rua perpendicular e restrição de via apenas para entrar na  pista da Jovita quando vindo da pista da Jovita em sentido contrário. Não sei como fazer isso no iD.
mavl (2019-05-12 16:10:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:10:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:10:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:10:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:10:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:11:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:11:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:11:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:11:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:11:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-12 16:11:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-01-09 21:09:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45037169 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some numbered objects in Gaza (suspected personal notes).  All attempts to contact the mapper have failed.
Warin61 (2017-03-15 01:30:28+00:00): Opps "Slap Up Road" .. tagged a highway=stream ...corrected to highway=unclassified .. as per LPI base map.
Hjart (2016-08-16 04:49:48+00:00): Is adding duplicate info like this really necessary?
SomeoneElse (2016-08-16 18:37:42+00:00): Here you've changed the "name" key to be in Tigrinya (which makes sense if that's the majority local language) but you've also removed the "name:ti" key.  That may not have been deliberate - it can be useful where there are lots of names for a place in lots of different languages to have both "name" and "name:ti" (even if they're the same).  It doesn't make sense everywhere (where there are fewer names for example).
Geography Canada (2016-08-16 19:13:28+00:00): I didn't know if I should keep it since I added Tigrinya to the name= already.
Geography Canada (2016-08-16 19:15:23+00:00): I see. Should I return name:ti to the node?
SomeoneElse (2016-08-16 21:35:17+00:00): I'd add name:ti back here (to the same value as the name), yes.
Geography Canada (2016-08-17 15:31:27+00:00): Okay, I will.
pnorman (2016-08-18 23:12:41+00:00): There's been some discussion about this data in http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/677611 - could you add a comment over there?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44650611 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44650611 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
Supaplex (2016-08-16 04:04:52+00:00): 地址欄位錯了，addr:street只有街道名稱，請把門牌號碼放在addr:housenumber裡
Supaplex (2016-08-16 04:02:50+00:00): 畫重覆了，已經有了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3664655
muralito (2016-08-16 11:26:27+00:00): Osvaldo:

alpine_hut es para refugio las montañas. Probablemente lo que mapeaste va en otra clasificacion. Busca en http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:tourism a ver si no clasifica mejor en otra

"VISTA DEL LAGO" no es attraction, es viewpoint. Ver http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint
Kagami (2016-08-16 04:01:37+00:00): amenity=school不是整片都建築物，而是標示學校範圍，各別校舍請個別畫
Serpico (2017-06-17 15:20:11+00:00): Can someone check http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437395793 the way seems to go over paddy fields, river, residential landscape without anything matching on the ground, at least according to DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery
dhoni007 (2019-03-11 12:38:25+00:00): Hi DiorZ,

Hope you are doing well, while working on Jakarta came across your edits where duplicate roads are created
way 437490386
way 437395796
As there is unclassified road which is already correct as per the aerial imagery and other ways around, deleting the duplicate way.
way 437395796.
Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.
Carnildo (2016-08-16 04:05:07+00:00): Is this a ski lift, or a trail following a lift?  The usual tagging for lifts is "aerialway=chair_lift" (or other "aerialway=" tags for other types of lift; see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste_Maps#Ski_lifts)
naimon (2016-08-16 17:10:14+00:00): It's a trail following an old ski lift.
Olyon (2016-10-27 08:42:01+00:00): Je ne comprend pas pourquoi vous changez des routes de unclasified à tertiary. Les routes tertiary doivent être des routes assez importantes qui permettent de relier des villages entre eux. Souvent ce sont des routes départementales. pour les route moins importantes il faut utiliser unclasified
mueschel (2016-08-18 08:50:38+00:00): Hi,
I found a spelling mistake in 90 nodes:
addr:villiage -> addr:village
Can you correct this?
Cheers, Jan
Supaplex (2016-08-18 09:58:49+00:00): Hi Jan
I fix it
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41530312
Supaplex (2016-08-18 10:05:20+00:00): Miss way and relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41530483
Supaplex (2016-08-16 03:51:17+00:00): 那個，amenity=school不是整片都建築物，而是標示學校範圍，各別校舍請個別畫
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44650611 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2016-08-16 09:07:26+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your interest in OSM. It looks like you've added your address to OSM, that's great, we need more addresses. However you've categorised it as a hotel, which I suspect is not what you want. Are you open for business as a hotel? Do you want people to be turning up looking for a room to stay in? :) I've removed that tag (the `tourism=hotel`).

You also added a name of "My House". OSM is a global map, for everyone. A house should only have an name if it actually has a name, like for postage.

I've fixed up this change so that it's more sensible. If I did anything incorrect, feel free to change it back. Or chat here! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41485043
Colin Smale (2016-08-16 09:12:13+00:00): Alex, please remember that OSM is not your personal playground. Please engage with the community first if you want to suggest changes to the current way of working.
alexkemp (2016-08-16 20:31:32+00:00): This is an automated response: sorry, but I'm too busy mapping to be able to spare the time to respond to you. Thank you for your interest in my mapping. -Alex Kemp
SomeoneElse (2016-08-16 22:02:16+00:00): Hi Alex,
We (the Data Working Group) have had another complaint about "autoreplies" to changeset discussion comments.  Whilst it's perfectly normal that not everyone will be able to respond to every changeset discussion comment immediately, using an "autoreply" like this just makes it look like you're deliberately ignoring people.  Please don't do it.
As I suggested before, the talk-gb list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-August/thread.html is probably the best place to discuss GB admin level and place mapping.  It may be that you need a bit of time to reply (which is fine, life sometimes gets in the way) but please turn off the autoreply.
Best Regards,
Andy
alexkemp (2016-08-16 23:18:24+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse

I am deliberately ignoring The Maarssen Mapper, at this time. This individual is consciously trolling me and attempting to provoke undue responses. It's a very clever action by a questionable person. I need to have time to calm down & regain balance following a concerted attack, as explained previously.

Everyone else has respected my auto-responses.

The Maarssen Mapper has deleted my mapping without consultation and altered my former mapping, also without consultation. I understand that that is considered abuse by the DWG. None of that has provoked a response from me, so he has switched to making provocative comments to changesets.

There is nothing whatsoever that could be said in response to the opening comment. Ask yourself: “What would *I* say in response to a comment like that?”

Apart, perhaps, from asking for the The Maarssen Mapper to be given a cease-and-desist order, at this moment I have nothing to put to the talk-gb list.

I've formulated my evidence with the changeset prior to this one & will shortly be writing it up. Being able to express myself cogently takes me a long time - sorry about that. When complete, I will have something to say. Meanwhile, I've got yesterday's mapping to writeup, and a Diary entry to make.

I'll say something when I've got something to say.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-17 19:22:08+00:00): Alex,
No-one is "consciously trolling" you.  "Please engage with the community first if you want to suggest changes to the current way of working" is very sensible advice in all sorts of circumstances in OSM - there's a lot of latent knowledge, not all of it written down - for example I'd say that about half of all first posts to the "imports" list are met with exactly that response.
Best Regards,
Andy
poornibadrinath (2016-08-16 05:56:26+00:00): Hi Inayat Ur Rahman,
I came across your edits and noticed you have created guest houses and named them with years and the person's name. Guest houses are for travellers and they are used as a resting point. They cannot be named in personal names. Can you please explain whether these are real guest houses or are these normal homes. 
Best,
Poornima Badrinath
Commodoortje (2016-08-16 06:49:21+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik het pand ook geplaatst.
Als je iets toevoegd met MAPS.ME zoom dan genoeg in zodat dit de nauwkeurigheid ten goede komt.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
DD1GJ (2016-08-16 21:45:19+00:00): Auf Nachfrage: Geoportat diente nur der Planung zum Vorbeifahren. Punkte wurden wor Ort gesehen und dann gemappt.
LLlypuk82 (2016-08-16 22:58:46+00:00): индекс данного ОПС ничего никому не говорит (в отличие от других) и там не оказываются «классические» услуги почты (только международные посылки)
southglos (2016-08-16 10:38:46+00:00): Hi

Thanks for adding these footpaths, but may I make a suggestion on tagging?  I notice you've added name="PROW (public right of way)".  The 'name' tag should be the name of the object, not what it is (imagine if every hedge were labelled 'hedge').

So 'name' should be the name of the path if it has one, or empty if it doesn't.

Legal rights-of-way information can be held in the 'designation' tag; e.g. designation=public_footpath or designation=restricted_byway etc (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation for more options).

It's also a good idea to mention where all this info came from, too (are these paths you've walked and surveyed, or copied from an old NPE map, or guessed from aerial imagery?); either in the changeset's 'source' tag or in the changeset comments.

Cheers, and happy mapping!