piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_8898764 (2021-04-27 15:30:03+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Ze zijn er nog bezig en de straat ligt nog wel goed open. Het duurt zeker nog wat weken of maanden. De Oosterlaan is inmiddels wel aangesloten maar nog niet vrijgegeven.

Begrijp ik het goed dat het wat lastig is voor routes? Het kan ook best dat de construction ervan af gehaald wordt. Mensen vinden hun weg wel via de omleiding. Het stationsplein is inmiddels wel opnieuw ingericht, maar nog niet vrijgegeven of officieel geopend.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Marcel
eggie (2021-04-27 15:59:57+00:00): Oke  duidelijk.. Met dat probleem van die wandel routes zou ik niet te veel zitten.
Volgens mij zijn de wandelrouteexperts bezig daar iets op te vinden zag ik laatst op het forum.

Het staat nu terecht nog op construction. 
Bedankt voor je reactie
eggie
chlenix (2021-02-09 16:50:52+00:00): Используйте для слоя Ukraine - Mykolaiv 2018 смещение 9.64,8.13 . Весь город под это смещение проверен.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98988743
chlenix (2021-02-09 16:54:05+00:00): Используйте для слоя Ukraine - Mykolaiv 2018 смещение 9.64,8.13 . Весь город под это смещение проверен. Не работайте по нулевому смещению
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98988743
canfe (2021-02-10 09:43:38+00:00): Se non ha intenzione di diventare un mapper ma solo posizionare la sua attività c'è:

https://su.openstreetmap.it/
Per tutto il resto può rispondere qui.
maraf24 (2021-03-04 09:38:36+00:00): Ta aleja naprawdę ma być taka szeroka?
Mordechai23 (2021-03-04 11:50:46+00:00): Nie wiem o co dokładnie pytasz, ale w wielu miejscach wg projektu ma być pas zieleni między chodnikami a jezdnią aż 7 metrów, a szerokość przekroju się wacha na całej długości tak od 20 do 40 metrow
maraf24 (2021-03-04 18:28:45+00:00): Dzięki, o to mi właśnie chodziło w pytaniu.
maraf24 (2022-01-12 09:10:18+00:00): Gdzie jest dostępny ten projekt budowlany i jaka była na niego licencja (w kwestii użycia w OSM)?
Mordechai23 (2022-01-12 09:39:33+00:00): wszystkie te projekty biorę z publicznie dostępnych materiałów dla uczestników przetargu ze strony spółki Wrocławskie Inwestycje.

Jaka jest ich licencja? Nie mam pojęcia, wzmianek o warunkach użytkowania nie widziałem
maraf24 (2022-01-19 09:39:49+00:00): Google Maps też są publicznie dostępne.
Wypadałoby link podać, bo potem nie ma jak sprawdzić ani przebiegu ani tego, co dziwnego budują. Poszukam na stronie WI.
Mashin (2021-02-09 19:27:50+00:00): Hey David, what is going on with West Rock Park? Now the main section is split into 3 parts. Some outer parts are overlapping probably causing it not to render. And as far as I know there is no  West Rock Ridge New Haven Park.
literan (2021-02-10 16:31:25+00:00): на снимке видно, что площадка не такая широкая
pardthemonster (2021-03-10 01:05:43+00:00): This edit has renamed the entire river area of the Huron River from Ann Arbor to the North end of Dexter as Barton Pond.  Please revisit edit or let me know if you need assistance.
wolfgang8741 (2021-03-10 04:12:19+00:00): Oh no! I didn't realize this happened, working in ID editor and thought it split near Brokaw Nature Area since highlighting doesn't load unless you zoom out. Would love help in correctly splitting the river area to demarcate the transition from reservoir to river as separate namable shapes.
pardthemonster (2021-03-10 11:25:08+00:00): I believe this is corrected now per Changeset 100775070.  Please make sure that still meets your previous intent.
wolfgang8741 (2021-03-11 20:17:41+00:00): Thank you, that does appear to resolve the error correctly.
canfe (2021-02-10 09:41:02+00:00): parking_aisle non è un valore di driveway.
Non si possono mischiare ed intercambiare i tag coi valori.
In realtà non si capisce bene che funzione abbia quest'area.
chlenix (2021-02-09 17:51:47+00:00): не согласен, считаю что разделять их необходимо по размеру, и социально-экономическому значению и использованию в адресации (принцип вложенности). ОСМ не историческая карта. В чем по-вашему разница между Широкой Балкой и Лесками, или между Кульбакино и Ракетной Рощей?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98990458
Rainero (2021-02-10 22:57:12+00:00): Hallo reiserausch,
bei diesem Edit ist wohl etwas schiefgegangen, an dieser Stelle ist nicht die Riesebyer Straße in Eckernförde.
Falls es sich um eine Firma oder ein Geschäft handelt, bitte angeben, um was für eins. Private Namen sollten nicht in Openstreetmap eingetragen werden. Das betrifft auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98925651
Falls Hilfe beim Zurücksetzen der Einträge benötigt wird, sagt Bescheid.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Rainero (2022-02-12 09:15:11+00:00): Revert mit CS117313632, da keine Antwort und offensichtlich falsche Adresse.
Palolo (2021-02-09 19:14:30+00:00): Thank you for helping map this part of Tanzania. Please take the time to accurately map each building. The Project instructions show how to make square corners on the buildings.
aixbrick (2021-02-09 17:07:53+00:00): Dies betrifft folgende Changesets: 98982925, 98983594, 98987163
TelloCaA (2021-02-09 17:24:33+00:00): La tienda cerró hace unos días.
pantufla (2021-02-15 11:30:37+00:00): hey thanks, but the buildings in these areas are primarly stilt houses that tend to be on the river flow.
eggie (2021-02-09 18:06:51+00:00): Tip

Je kunt beter PDOK actueel op de achtergrond zetten voor Nederland.
In editmodus rechts klikken op die drie laagjes en dan kiezen voor PDOK actueel.
MVG
eggie
muzirian (2021-02-10 11:42:20+00:00): Hi please dont add personal information in map, also add comments about the changes made as changeset comment
SomeoneElse (2021-03-14 13:19:52+00:00): Are you sure that the things that you've edited here really do exist?  You're tidying up after someone from Iran here who just seems to be engaged in a bit of fantasy mapping in a well-known "micronation".
Please don't just blindly follow where "OSM Inspector" leads - ask yourself "is this thing that I'm editing - in this case "Customs of Molossia" (also with name in Persian) actually likely to exist as is?
b-jazz (2021-03-14 18:15:07+00:00): Nope, I'm not sure. This looked sus from the very first minute I came across it. I left a note on one of the changesets and didn't hear back so I thought it would be best to at least make the topology consistent and hope that someone else with local knowledge could come back and do proper removals. I will continue to map in this manner, so we'll have to agree to disagree.
hsc666 (2021-02-10 11:30:26+00:00): Du hast für den Friseur einen Knoten aus einer Straße in der Nähe von Idar-Oberstein benutzt und damit eine Straße durch's ganze Land verlegt :-O. Hab das inzwischen wieder korrigiert, den Laden müsstet Du aber neu eintragen, falls gewünscht.
totosm (2021-02-10 12:07:04+00:00): Hi Danke fürs reparieren und sry für die Umstände. Das war natürlich nicht so gedacht.
den Laden habe ich jetzt neu angelegt.
canfe (2021-02-11 18:49:14+00:00): Il nome non può essere un nome generico ma proprio. Come "Garibaldi" e non descrittivo dell'oggetto. Sennò la panchina avrebbe nome "panchina".
canfe (2021-02-10 09:28:26+00:00): L'edificio non è squadrato. va squadrato ccol tasto Q
L'edificio non penso abbia come nome Gruppo Alpini, bensì sia sede.
Pertanto mettere un punto con le caratteristiche della sede, così se cambia si sposta semplicemente il punto.
canfe (2021-02-10 09:32:46+00:00): Il parcheggio va connesso alla strada, se è "a filo" senza cordoli usare parking=street_side
TheBestIdea (2021-02-09 18:21:53+00:00): 20 mph, that is
deuzeffe (2021-02-27 18:24:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez créé une précision sur la voie montante de la rue Turgot réservée aux bus et véhicules de service et l'avez séparée de la voie descendante, même si la séparation n'existe pas sur le terrain (pas de terre-plein central, sauf sur une toute petite partie en bas de la rue, comme vous avez dû le voir sur la BD ortho). Pourquoi pas.
Je ne sais pas si vous avez fait attention aux alertes de votre éditeur qui a dû vous indiquer qu'il y avait des pb avec le nombre et le sens des voies de la rue Turgot et que toutes les lignes de bus qui passent par cette voie réservée passent en sens interdit sur l'autre voie ?

Comment peut-on réparer ça sans reprendre une à une la 20aine de lignes de bus qui passe par là ?
deuzeffe (2021-03-17 20:40:34+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai corrigé votre modification erronée.

Vous serait-il possible de préciser davantage le contenu de vos éditions en commentant vos changeset avec une formule plus explicite que "maj" ?
SHARCRASH (2021-08-13 09:45:18+00:00): Bonjour! De nouveau moi la personne qui questionnait votre position sur OSM du gué romain de Reilandermillen proche du pont en bois. J'ai été sur le terrain, il a fallu que je longe tout le ruisseau à partir du pont pour finalement le trouver qu'à peine quelques mètres du parking Reilandermillen comme je l'avait suggéré grâce au images LIDAR. Comparé à votre position initiale il y a une différence de 60m. Photo: https://drive.google.com/file/d/19emWDHUrbLR4Mcx6bgCiRFaWmjirQ1Va/

Après ça, êtes vous aussi sûr que l'époque de construction du gué est romaine? Avez vous une source officielle ou est-ce une hypothèse personnelle (qui peut être aussi officielle si vous êtes archéologue)?

Merci également pour votre contribution récente de la cave voûtée à Paaschent. J'y ai également précisé la position et ajouté d'autres éléments tel que escaliers, sentiers, etc.

Bien à vous,
S.
micheleOSM3 (2021-04-07 18:52:22+00:00): I had contacted the operator of the "Cammino Celeste" months ago, who told me that "Iter Aquileiense" is an old name, even the symbol "IA", I don't think that's what the operator would want.
Maybe you should contact him.
Cascafico (2021-02-10 08:20:30+00:00): Per cortesia, mi puoi citare il chiarimento via twitter e gruppo OSM? credevo non si assegnasse il nome ad ogni singola way; questo precedente significa dover modificare centinaia di way in tutta Italia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98995645
alesarrett (2021-02-10 08:35:57+00:00): Consiglio inoltre di usare la mailing list ufficiale di OpenSteetMap in Italia, talk-it (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it) per discutere e concordare su pratiche di mappatura visto che, al contrario di Telegram, permette di ritrovare e fare riferimento alle discussioni. Se ci sono regole concordate, sarebbe utile inoltre riportarle nelle corrispondenti pagine del wiki (dopo averle discusse).
alessandrocarmeli (2021-02-10 09:30:16+00:00): È il gruppo della comunità italiana di OSM (non metto il link poichè è privato)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98995645
kapazao (2021-02-10 11:33:04+00:00): Hola, estás duplicando elementos. Si la zona de una residencia ya tiene todos los valores necesarios no hay que copiarlos en los elementos interiores. Los edificios simplemente se etiquetan con lo necesario del edificio, alturas o nombre propio si lo tuviera. En estos casos no se debe hacer así, ya lo revierto.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98995701
kapazao (2021-02-12 12:46:50+00:00): Corregido https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99176875
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98995701
eggie (2021-02-09 19:38:14+00:00): Dag Eddy,
Die landuse=forest hoort op de relatie en niet op het vlak zelf.
Verwijder landuse=forest  Open de relatie en tag daar landuse=forest

Zet op de inner natural=water
Probeer je het eerst zelf?

De inner raagt altijd wel de landuse of watertag  De outer nooit. Die hoort op de relatie dus.

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-02-09 19:38:36+00:00): type raagt > draagt
Edmundus (2021-02-09 21:37:10+00:00): De relatie heb ik opnieuw gemaakt. Nu minder foutmeldingen. Maar de tag die het gebied beschrijft ontbreekt nog. Ik kom er niet achter hoe/waar ik die beschrijving kan aanbrengen.
Met vriendelijke groet van Eddy.
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-22 15:05:55+00:00): Salut,
tu sembles avoir ajouté des éléments avec building=yes dans des bâtiments (par exemple ceci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905562504 dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472154715).

Pour les diverses activités, il est préférable je pense de faire des noeuds ou alors si ceux sont des activités vraiment séparées avec des pièces spécifiques, tu peux partir sur l'indoor (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:indoor), mais qui vont poser d'autres questions !

à plus
Bobos-Seven (2021-02-25 14:11:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce sont effectivement des activités séparées avec des pièces, des intervenants et un accès extérieur spécifique.
Que préconise tu, l'emploi d'un étage ?
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-25 14:19:31+00:00): Non, peut-être simplement des points, sans tag building pour éviter que les analyses qualité hurlent :)
Bobos-Seven (2021-02-26 09:49:59+00:00): Bonjour
Ok, Modifiés en points
trigpoint (2021-02-10 19:24:36+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone very very wrong.

There was nothing wrong with the boundary type of this relation yet you have changed it to boundary=boundary then to boundary=administrative in changeset 98997377.

This the ceremonial boundary of Shropshire, it has no administrative function.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_counties_of_England

This edit is damaging to OSM data, I am therefore reverting your changes to this boundary. 

If you need help understanding what the various versions of Shropshire are then please ask. I live here.

Cheers Phil
BCNorwich (2021-02-11 08:32:43+00:00): Many more problems with your mapping (to many to list individually). If you read this be advised that Way: Cranbury Park (361428234) is a meadow used as farmland but termed as parkland, part of the Cranbury Estate. Tagging as leisure=park indicates the land is used as a leisure area which it certainly is not as far as the public are concerned.
BCNorwich (2021-02-11 08:41:15+00:00): Same incorrect tagging, Way: Cranbury Park (305485942) is not leisure=park (it's not a public leisure area). It's landuse=residential, it's named Cranbury Park because it is private parkland, part of the estate. There is a great difference between a park and parkland. Please stop incorrectly changing tags.
BCNorwich (2021-02-11 09:03:21+00:00): Again Way: Cranbury Park (108474826) incorrectly tagged as leisure.
user_5359 (2021-02-10 15:14:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/292242386/history.What is the meaning of roof:shape=1?
googlenaut (2021-02-10 21:44:13+00:00): upps! 
thx for replying.
it's a skillion!
googlenaut (2021-02-10 21:47:12+00:00): source is Norge Ortho and photo.
ndm (2021-02-09 21:48:03+00:00): Looks like the salon was added twice and some roads got dragged about a bit - will try to fix.
Emilydean01 (2021-02-09 23:30:06+00:00): Thank you
ftcat (2021-02-20 10:53:44+00:00): I see you have tagged outline of the reservoir with a fix me. Note satellite imagery in this part of the world can be many years out of date. This reservoir was completed 2 years ago and with the rains this year it is probably close to full but I have not visited it recently. Problem with HOT projects is they are mapping the past and not current situations.

You also state that multipolygons are not necessary for dams or reservoirs, they may not be necessary but they work well as you don't have ways over lapping each other. Furthermore a reservoir is made up of the water body and the dam wall that holds back the water, ideal situation for a multipolygon don't you think? I notice you have mapped some reservoir outlines very precisely, the levels of these reservoirs will fluctuate greatly throughout the year and from year to year, most of them in this area are for irrigation projects and since it only rains from November to March they will be empty by October of the next year and may not fill fully in the coming years. Have a look at the same reservoirs with different imagery and you will see what I mean.
OttoR (2021-02-25 21:19:13+00:00): Hi Ftcat,
With regards to the reservoir; this was the reason why I tagged it with a fixme. Could not validate it from imagery (as outdate) but also could not find any only reference to the project being finished.

With regards to the mapping of dams and reservoirs; the agreed way to map these globally is to map the outer line of the inundated area as much as possible. When it occurs that for extended periods of time the reservoir is not full you use the tags intermittent and/or seasonal.

With regards to the use of multipolygons:
1) it is not the purpose to minimise the amount of ways overlapping.
2) it is far complexer for people to edit (as you need knowledge of how to manage multipolygons)
3) it makes for complex items in the database. The road is now mapped as a dam and as water. which is also incorrect as the road is not a waterbody.
4) the road and the water do not touch; often there is a tunnel underneath or some part of the road is actually a bridge where the dam is more a weir type of structure.

Although I am not in favor of the usage to combine the dam as a line and the road as one; I know this is common practice. The reservoir ends at the dam and therefor shares a line with the dam and the road is actually behind the dam; or the dam is mapped as an area and the reservoir might share a line, and the road is on top of the dam.

If you want to map them together; still connect the several lines to make editing much more simple en clear what tag belongs to wath item. And to use a mulitpolygon makes it uncessarily complex to edit if there are changes to the road or the dam.

The purpose of multipolygons are to ensure that two polygons that belong to the same structure can be mapped as such. E.g. a patio in the middle of the building; or a serie of lakes that together form a landmark. e.g. "The Panama canal" you could theoratically create a multipolygon existing of the several locks on both sides of the continent, the lakes and riverways that connect the locks. They did not do it this way and only added the waterway canal as multipolygons to show that it is a series of waterways belonging to the same structure.
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-16 11:35:43+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cet ajout,
je trouve que c'est une bonne idée que l'association souhaite libérer des données relatives aux diverses oeuvres exposées.
Par rapport à votre apport, je me permet de signaler que la description semble être un copié collé, mais qui ne rentre pas le champs est limité à un nombre de caractère et se doit de rester trés descriptif.
Si il est réellement important pour vous de décrire les dimensions, il y a des attributs pour cela, à creuser. Les latitudes et longitudes ne sont pas nécessaires car vous avez positionné géographiquement l'oeuvre justement.
Au plaisir de discuter de tout cela !
Bonne journée
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-09 22:33:53+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thanks for adding this. It's best to keep things separate though. Since this postbox isn't in the middle of the road (I assume), can you make a new node, not connected to the road, and tag the postbox on there?
eggie (2021-02-09 21:00:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedback.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de reeds bestaande adresnode. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
segi (2021-02-09 21:15:05+00:00): Ahoj,
si si istý úpravou tej železničnej trate? lebo na okraji cesty ju ju posunul mimo násyp
https://ibb.co/fXWcBy0
radokado (2021-02-09 22:05:32+00:00): Opravoval som to podľa starých máp a nemal som ten podklad na ktorom si to ukázal. Akú vrstvu podkladu na to používaš? Opravím to.
segi (2021-02-10 15:22:02+00:00): Pozerám že upravuješ cez iD editor. Podlož si to Freemap.sk Outooor mapou. Už je do nej zapracované tieňovanie z DMR5.0 takže už sa dá aj tam editovať podľa toho tieňovania.
Je to však zatiaľ iba pre západné Slovensko.
Jose Luis Infante (2021-02-15 18:08:21+00:00): Hola,
una pregunta: ¿todos los pasos de peatones de esta edición no tienen semáforos?
Los que tienen semáforo deben ser crossing=traffic_signals.
Un saludo!
ooosssay (2024-07-27 21:45:06+00:00): Hello! Please remember that copyrighted info from Google Street View can’t be in OSM. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/660763396) I have removed some tags.
c3112n (2021-02-19 13:10:18+00:00): Die Gemeinde Somborn wurde während der Gebietsreform damals zwischen Bochum und Dortmund aufgeteilt.
Ein Teil von Somborn liegt in Bochum, ist aber kein richtiger Stadtteil, sondern ein Teil von Langendreer, weshalb es hier auch mit place = neighbourhood eingetragen war.
c3112n (2021-02-19 13:11:51+00:00): Bzw. ist [place = neighbourhood] das, was man nehmen sollte.
Bienson (2021-03-12 03:48:44+00:00): Alles klar!
ottwiz (2021-02-09 20:46:50+00:00): The changeset comment would be that I wanted to split up forests and aligned some roads, but I have many many conflicts during deletion because for now I delete one part of the forest out there (which will be redrawn once just because i want to split it up and it takes a lot of time)
orthocircular (2025-06-29 18:26:28+00:00): FYI I've taken to referring to food cart pods as "food courts" since they basically are just outdoor slightly ad hoc food courts. I'll leave the landuse=retail areas you started but I want to make them more obvious and searchable for food, moreso than the name of i.e. a business plaza and landuse that often won't show up in maps or searches.
ottwiz (2021-02-09 20:53:27+00:00): I had a lot of conflict during deletion, i deleted a huge forest area (which will be redrawn once but i deleted it because i splitted up forest areas, just i didn't have time to split that part (the part is between WV 3 and WV 99) . I also added some lanes with their names from TIGER Roads. I hope i didn't cause any more conflicts as of now (because JOSM warned me about a dozen)
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-10 11:38:29+00:00): à une sortie terrain à Gastes :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98999614
Soniacdt40 (2021-02-10 12:45:27+00:00): Oui, entre 2 averses ! :-)
PlaneMad (2021-02-12 03:55:49+00:00): Due to the mountain slope, its impossible that there is standing water at this location. Please explain what you meant by snow lakes?
NativeMapper (2021-02-12 18:02:44+00:00): You can see in the image, water is available in the area.
PlaneMad (2021-02-12 03:52:54+00:00): Is there a reason, the glacier was tagged as a lake? reverting now as there does not seem to be any evidence of this happening.
PT-53 (2021-02-15 08:17:59+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905602314/history
ist mal wieder eine Linie ohne Merkmale.

Da Du ja zwischenzeitlich JOSM nutzt: JOSM enthält einen Validator / Datenprüfer, der beim hochladen einen entspr.Hinweis anzeigt.
Den Validator / Datenprüfer kannst Du über Menü Bearbeiten > Einstellungen > Datenprüfer einstellen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:JOSM/Guide#Validator

Grüße
PT-53 (2021-02-15 08:35:47+00:00): Weitere Info zum JOSM-Validator:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Ich nutze den Validator nur "beim Hochladen". Dann werden auch nur Hinweise zu Objekten, die man selbst bearbeitet hat, angezeigt.
PT-53 (2021-02-21 08:04:03+00:00): Hallo EinEngener, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2021-02-28 07:14:04+00:00): Hallo EinEngener, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch reagieren würdest. Oder muß ich eine Sperre gegen Dich beantragen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2021-03-10 08:11:42+00:00): Hallo EinEngener, 
nachdem Du leider immer noch nicht reagiert hast, habe ich heute diese Linie gelöscht.
Grüße
osmer120311 (2021-02-12 07:02:39+00:00): Congrats with #99000000 changeset!
gscholz (2021-02-14 09:12:17+00:00): Hi belenortigoza_,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-56.03968&lat=-25.45318&zoom=16

Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido