piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marc__marc (2020-03-28 12:26:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour le retour.
Le fait d'être payant est décrit par fee=yes
access=customers décrirait plutôt le cas d'une borne réservé aux clients d'un hôtel ou d'un restaurant : si tu n'es pas client du POI, tu peux pas l'utiliser, indépendamment de payant ou gratuit.
Merci pour la correction de la ref, cela permettra à osmose de retrouver la correspondance, bien pratique.
Cordialement,
Marc
Mathias_ADAV5962 (2020-03-28 13:28:33+00:00): Oui en effet, je viens de me faire la même réflexion, je vais supprimer ce tag via jsom.
Mathias
Squizie3 (2020-03-24 01:45:14+00:00): Beste Jorisbo,
ik zie dat je ter hoogte van de Teniersplaats, Operaplein e.d. zaken als metro-toegangen toegevoegd hebt op basis van het GRB en luchtfotografie van 2015. Deze zone is echter volledig verbouwd en de wijzigingen die je gemaakt hebt zijn niet correct, ik had dit immers eerder al aangepast aan de nieuwste plannen die ondertussen reeds uitgevoerd zijn, en zal dus een aantal zaken terug moeten verwijderen. Probeer indien mogelijk altijd de meest recente luchtfotografie en plannen te gebruiken, al was het maar om even te checken of de beelden van 2015 (die meestal gedetailleerder zijn) nog correct zijn. In dit geval is op de recentste beelden immers goed op te zien dat er iets veranderd is.
Vriendelijke groeten,
Squizie3
Jorisbo (2020-03-24 07:17:05+00:00): Hallo Squizie,

Bedankt voor je aanpassing. Ik heb eigen foto’s en videobeelden gebruikt van 15 maart jongstleden. Kan natuurlijk altijd iets verkeerd overgenomen zijn.
Ik ga er vanuit dat je zelf gecorrigeerd hebt naar wat je denkt dat het wel moet zijn.

Gr Joris
.
HeidrichAttila (2020-03-21 19:35:19+00:00): a lényeget megcsináltam újra, a korábbi már nagyon sok mellékhatással járt, nem tudtam összefésülni a meglévő adatokkal
AndreaDp271 (2022-04-12 10:01:25+00:00): Troppi errori, perché le aree agricole coincidono con le strade? ma soprattutto perché hai segnato i semafori sulle aree agricole?
eggie (2020-03-21 20:20:00+00:00): Beste Itserik... Het gebied van je edits is wat groot. Ook geef je niet aan wat je edits inhouden. Wanneer wegen elkaar kruisen zonder verbindingsnode geeft dit foutmeldingen.
Je edits.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=82468605

De vebindingsnode heb ik even toegevoegd.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-21 20:45:35+00:00): Lijkt me oke.. 
.. met die heggen is momenteel iets geks aan de hand.
Je kunt alleen het lijnelement gebruiken en geen vlakken meer maken mbv combinatie area =yes
Er loopt een draadje op het forum over.
Wat leesvoer https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68585
Gr eggie
literan (2020-03-23 14:24:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Обычно вдоль дворовых проездов тротуары не отрисовывают. По правилам, пешеходы могут ходить по ним где вздумается (и имеют преимущество), а с отдельными тротуарами роутинг будет вести пешеходов до ближайшего пересечения
mrbaja (2020-04-01 07:03:26+00:00): Ok!
whb (2020-03-22 10:16:51+00:00): Wieso hast du die Adresse "Ortsstraße 35" entfernt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3275075487/history
eggie (2020-03-21 20:22:14+00:00): Kijk even hier hoe mtb paden te mappen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Mountain_biking
MVG,
eggie
YraFyra (2020-03-22 22:22:31+00:00): Hi
Is it really good to remove the playground info?
vogelfreier (2020-03-24 08:02:21+00:00): The playground is part of the park. The playground facilities are not distributed over the entire area as in this area.
With the two values Leisure= you don't get clear information if there is only the park or only the playground.
From drawing I got used to drawing parks/residential areas/grass areas right up to the streets, because there are different evaluations for the streets.
If the playground is there, then an extra area in the corner where it is.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
MacLondon (2020-04-17 01:44:43+00:00): Hi, I was wondering if the turn restriction at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10876648 should be "no_u_turn" instead of "only_u_turn"?
Davileci (2023-08-09 23:45:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto)
cronoser (2023-10-31 01:28:59+00:00): Hola David, gracias por la información, en su momento lo desconocía. Te animo a que los corrijas. Un saludo
pitfire (2021-12-24 07:50:55+00:00): Hallo Lukas,
Betrifft den Weg: "Weg: 783430188".
Kennst Du dich hier besser aus? 
Im Luftbild glaube ich einen Containerplatz für Grünabfälle vom Friedhof zu erkennen. Möglicherweise kann der eine Fusswegverbindung zum Friedhof vertragen?
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=18&lat=50.841682&lon=7.205926&item=xxxx&level=1&issue_uuid=6d6afeab-a8cf-80b9-1924-05b457d66a0f.

Ich glaube der "Weg: 315956027"
von "malcolm_23 " über das Gebäude ist unsinnig. 
Kannst Du dir ja mal anschauen.
Gruß pitfire
user_3022894 (2021-12-27 18:08:11+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
oh ja, definitiv. Da hast du Recht. Ich kenne die Gegend zwar nicht persönlich in- und auswendig, aber durch die Luftbilder von 2019 und 2021 konnte ich dann doch einige Kleinigkeiten im Wegenetz erkennen, die zu verfeinern waren.
(Unter anderem die von dir genannte Wegeverbindung).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315956027 scheint ja tatsächlich bis zu diesem einen Gebäude zu gehen, aber nicht weiter. (Habe zusätzlich die Hecke als Barriere eingezeichnet).

Habe wie gesagt das Wegenetz nun verfeinert; und wo noch was zu klären wäre sind fixme's gesetzt, sodass diese Punkte dann idealerweise Lokale beim nächsten "Rundgang" bearbeiten können.

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
:-)

Viele Grüße
Lukas
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-22 13:50:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82483629 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 for more information.
maro21 (2020-03-22 15:53:04+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej zmiany?
jonorossi (2020-03-29 14:37:24+00:00): Hi, you've changed the speed limit of Boundary Rd going westbound. You've changed it from 80km/h to 70km/h the whole length between Woodlands Dr and Taylor Rd, however it is 80km/h from Woodlands Dr until the top of the hill before going down to the roundabout, about half way between Kinross Rd and Taylor Rd. Could you please recheck your changes, I didn't review eastbound because I don't recall exactly where the signs are.
Jono
!bm (2020-03-22 00:21:55+00:00): Hallo derhady! 

Ich hatte dich bereits in Kommentaren (vor allem) zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82462555 darauf hingewiesen, weshalb ich deine Änderungen für Unfug halte und sie somit rückgängig mache. Dennoch hast du etliche davon hier (in Cs 82470914) erneut hinzugefügt. Antworten auf meine Fragen fehlen. 

Bitte unterlasse bis auf Weiteres sämtliche Änderungen in OSM und melde dich unverzüglich! 

Diese Nachricht ergeht sowohl per changeset-Kommentar als auch als OSM-Privatnachricht. Sollte sich dieses Miss- bzw Nichtverständnis auf diesem Wege nicht regeln lassen, sehe ich mich veranlasst, die Data Working Group (DWG) zu informieren.

--besteGrüße!bm
!bm (2020-03-22 00:31:30+00:00): Änderungen vollständig zurückgesetzt in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82472663
jptolosa (2020-08-12 19:29:37+00:00): Hola, es hidrológicamente incorrecto dividir un lago sólo porque se le conoce por un nombre distinto en cada país. A mí ya me han revertido por hacer esto mismo. Deberíamos llegar a un consenso que no sea basado en el render.
Hernan (2020-08-12 20:57:02+00:00): Estoy de acuerdo con vos, pero en su momento no se me ocurrio otra forma de mostrar ambosnombres en forma correcta. Si hablasemos distintos idiomas seria facilisimo, pero si no se me ocurrio otra forma de mostrar ambas realidades, porque si no la otra forma es usar ambos nombres con un guion, pero tampoco es correcta. Que te dijeron de hacer las veces que te lo revirtieron?
jptolosa (2020-08-13 01:11:37+00:00): Me dijeron que se trata de un solo lago y eso implica usar un solo (multi)polígono para representarlo.

Pero incluso en esos lugares donde hablan idiomas distintos, se colocan los dos nombres en name=* (por ejemplo name=Golfe du Lion / Golfo de León). En caso todos los lugares separan con / los distintos nombres. Creo que deberíamos hacer lo mismo y lamentablemente no podremos acompañar con etiquetas más especificas de multilengua.
Hernan (2020-08-13 10:09:32+00:00): Ok, lo haces vos o preferis que lo haga yo?
jptolosa (2020-08-13 21:14:25+00:00): Yo me encargo, no hay problema. Preguntan desde acá si estarías de acuerdo con que en los lagos compartidos se coloque la nomenclatura chilena primero. Esto debido a que resulta más intuitivo para alguien mirar el nombre utilizado por Chile del lado izquierdo y el utilizado por Argentina del lado derecho.
Hernan (2020-08-13 22:02:42+00:00): Si, no tengo problema con el nombre. No se si a alguien mas le importara, pero ya veremos si lo cambian o algo asi. Fijate en este lago que el borde del lago esta compartido con otra relacion de un area protegida, asi no se rompe. Si no luego lo reviso
gscholz (2020-04-17 04:30:40+00:00): Hi ramirezcesar,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.53683&lat=-25.43758&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

Guido
Enock4seth (2021-04-18 17:05:35+00:00): Could you please add a reference to where https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare:speciality=abortion for the facility?
opendcc (2020-03-22 05:54:49+00:00): Hallo,

laut Website der hhk:

"Nutzungsbedingungen dieser Website

Die Inhalte (Text- und Bildmaterial) auf www.hkk.de und im Kundenportal "meine hkk" werden den Nutzern ausschließlich zum privaten Gebrauch zur Verfügung gestellt. Jede gewerbliche Nutzung und Weiterverarbeitung der Inhalte dieses Online-Angebotes darf nur mit schriftlicher Genehmigung erfolgen."

Hast Du diese Freigabe. Dann bitte im OpenStreetMap-wiki hinterlegen. Danke.

Falls nicht, Änderungen bitte rückgängig machen. Siehe hierzu auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Legal_FAQ
meripb (2020-03-22 11:53:39+00:00): Hallo,

Ich habe es gemacht um dieses Projekt zu unterstützen: https://devpost.com/software/kapazitaetsmonitor#updates

Die Daten gehören nicht zu HKK, man darf die auch im Krankenhaus Website oder im Wikipedia finden.

Darf ich nur die Quelle ändern?

VG, María
frosm (2020-03-31 22:10:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6328064384
j'ai ajouté des infos opendata (réseau, propriétaire, ...) sur l'une de ces 3 bornes ayant le même nombres de prises que ce que vous avez renseigné.
est-ce que les 3 bornes sont du même opérateur/réseau ? si oui n'hésitez pas à me le dire et/ou à ajouter les infos sur les 2 autres, y compris la même ref.
Bonne conitnuation
user_1566574 (2020-03-31 22:15:33+00:00): Honnêtement, je ne maîtrise pas très bien l'intégration de ces infos.

Vous voulez les photos ?
frosm (2020-03-31 22:16:45+00:00): avec plaisir.
rien que me dire si c'est 3 bornes sont du même opérateur m'aiderait beaucoup
user_1566574 (2020-03-31 22:32:42+00:00): C'est «freshmile charge » pour les 3 effectivement, avec le même propriétaire (SYDED)  :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6328067685
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6328064383

Même chose pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7317206679

Et je ne me suis pas arrêté pour vérifier, mais celle-ci a la même apparence que celle dont tu t'es occupé à la Gare : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6841903209

Pour les photos, j'envoie ça en privé avec les explications (Twitter, email, autre) ?
andrewwiseman (2020-03-23 21:38:17+00:00): Hola. Muchos mapeadores han preguntado por qué está cambiando caminos como este a"track", pero nunca respondió: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3392. El wiki de OSM dice "No use track para representar calles sin pavimentar en áreas urbanizadas": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack. Estas deben ser residenciales.

Many mappers have asked why you are changing roads like this to track but you’ve never replied: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3392. The OSM wiki says “Do not use tracks to represent unpaved streets in built-up areas": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack. These should be residential.
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-22 14:17:10+00:00): Hi sokol15, welcome to OSM.

looks ok. #HappyMapping

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
stevea (2020-03-23 01:50:26+00:00): I politely disagree with the tag route=tram on BJWR.  It's a route=train, it simply happens to run on miniature tracks.  There are lots of these, they are trains, not trams.
stevea (2020-03-23 01:51:34+00:00): I think we leave passenger=local off of these, for sure.
Allison P (2020-03-23 03:18:01+00:00): Ditto for Disneyland Railroad and some amusement rides.
stevea (2020-03-23 05:04:47+00:00): Yes, while "amusement park" rail has yet to be fully fleshed out semantically (very well, very comprehensively), I'm 100% certain we don't do so with route=tram.  That's a particular thing (not this).  A tram might get passenger=local, but amusement park trains (like miniature trains in suburban parks, too), no, those don't get a passenger tag at all.  So, that's a good place to begin to "cleave these apart," but it isn't the whole conversation.
Dr Kludge (2020-03-23 13:45:16+00:00): I appreciate the passion of this change.  However, you edited out local knowledge.  I left comments about my last change in the hopes that other mappers would understand that my public transportation network is different.  I am removing your edits.
Dr Kludge (2020-03-23 13:46:03+00:00): A mass edit list this across a large area is never good!
clay_c (2020-03-23 17:22:32+00:00): Alright, I reverted the amusement park rides to route=train. The railway infrastructure ("subdivision") relations I reclassified as route=railway remain that way.
stevea (2020-03-23 17:30:36+00:00): Yes, that seems better; correct in both cases (underlying infrastructure as route=railway and "small" trains like miniature and amusement park are route=train, not route=tram).  Thanks.
clay_c (2020-03-23 18:01:15+00:00): Hi Dr Kludge,

I appreciate your work keeping Phoenix's light rail system up-to-date. I've addressed your criticisms of my changeset here. I left a comment on your changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82526320), which you have clearly read because you've already fixed one aspect of it (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82533802).

Could you please answer the rest of my questions? Is there something specific to Valley Metro that makes stop IDs more fit for the name=* tag rather than the ref=* tag? How come VMLR is mapped with "train" tags rather than "light_rail" tags as used on light rail lines in the rest of the country?
Adamant1 (2020-03-25 02:43:42+00:00): Looks like the roads are there on the Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta) images
eggie (2020-03-22 07:11:16+00:00): Dannox... Ziet er netjes uit. Zou wel natural=scrub loshouden van landuse=grass. Europalaan / Scheldehof
JOSM heeft er trouwens geen moeite mee. 
Gr eggie
Dannox (2020-03-22 09:46:35+00:00): Wat bedoel je? Dat er een heg tussen staat?
eggie (2020-03-22 11:36:43+00:00): Hoi.. Wat ik bedoel is dat je beter  geen vlakken op vlakken "moet"  mappen.
Dan kun je dat gras er beter omheen laten lopen net als bij die stukken bos. 
Eggie.
eggie (2020-03-22 11:44:59+00:00): Wanneer zo'n vlak aan de zijkant ligt van het grote vlak is het simpel. Je legt het gras er omheen. Wanneer een vlak middenin een groter vlak ligt wordt het lastiger. Zoals zo'n sportveld.
Op de standaardkaart zie je het veld, maar op afgeleide kaarten zie je vaak niets. (alleen het sportsymbool)  De truc is een multipolygon. Het gras is dan de outer en het sportveld wordt de inner. Met josm is dat een makkie om te doen.
Een eilandje in water wordt bv ook als mp relatie  gemapt anders zou je het niet zien op de kaart.
eggie (2020-03-22 11:55:09+00:00): Als voorbeeld even dat sportveld in een mp gezet. 
landuse=grass (de outer) staat nu niet meer op de polygoon, maar op de mp relatie. De leisure=pitch (inner) hoort gewoon wel op de polygoon van het veld.
Dannox (2020-03-22 13:01:37+00:00): Ahh heel erg bedankt! Wat betreft dat stuk bij dat hofje: Ben ik gewoon vergeten te veranderen nadat ik een scrub had toegevoegd. Ga ik nu meteen rechtzetten. En bedankt voor de mp! Wist ik niet
gscholz (2020-03-22 07:50:19+00:00): Hi "the magnate",
thanks for adjusting at least the highway type of the residential streets. The intersection error still persists:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-79.94841&lat=-1.79783&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

My impression is that the streets leading to this small village have the wrong highway type as well. Can you confirm this? Are those streets actually oneways? Seems very unlikely to me. Can you please check?

Guido
gscholz (2020-03-22 07:54:16+00:00): Hi "the magnate", 
my impression is the lecture of this introduction to OSM may help you:

https://learnosm.org/es/

Can you please read this?
Guido
dbaron (2020-03-22 01:42:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82473351 where the changeset comment is: Revert edit in which part of the edit was lost
jonorossi (2020-03-29 13:11:28+00:00): Hi, you've changed Pateman Parade to fully built, it isn't. Part is built but still fenced off and the last section isn't built yet. Marking it complete means routing will incorrectly direct people through there. I've fixed it and updated the check dates.
Jono
Coss a toin (2020-03-29 14:03:25+00:00): Hi Jono,

Thank you for letting me know, I mistook it for another street further down, my apologies. I am still new to this so please be patient with me 😅
jonorossi (2020-03-29 14:24:48+00:00): No problem. Welcome to the other side, the small group actually contributing.
ralley (2020-03-22 04:44:52+00:00): This is vandalims - there is no militray checkpoint here, removing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82473919
user_5359 (2020-03-23 17:48:06+00:00): Hello! Please check the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116735194 and the tag haigway = tertiaryincline=down.
ralley (2020-03-22 04:42:35+00:00): School zones are not tagged in OSM as they are not independently verifiable on the ground
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474230
ralley (2020-03-22 04:41:42+00:00): Why did you delete tyhe building for Mrs Wah Laundromat and leave the shop tag?  The building appears to be there in latest aerial imagery and deleting it without removing the shop is non-sensical
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474292
user_5359 (2020-03-23 17:45:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. a golf car path isn't highway=pedestrian (highway=track)
ralley (2020-03-22 04:38:37+00:00): Why are you deleting address nodes?  Also please dont create nodes with just the shop name, also add the type of shop, eg. amenity=restaurant etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474375
user_5359 (2020-03-22 05:47:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
ralley (2020-03-22 04:36:16+00:00): Why have you placed a cliff in the road (see aerial imagery)?  Also please don't put descriptions in the name field - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474434
kapazao (2020-03-22 14:18:16+00:00): Hola, se acordó hace tiempo que el etiquetado para el metro de Granada era tram y no otra cosa.
Puedes ver el hilo aquí: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Corregir-Metro-de-Granada-td5921307.html
Revertiré los cambios. Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474609
Jotaele_ (2020-03-22 14:25:44+00:00): Hola, perdona, no había visto el mensaje anteriormente. Por qué es más correcto etiquetarlo como tram y no como light_rail. No sería más adecuado esto último? Un saludo.
kapazao (2020-03-28 13:23:19+00:00): En el hilo que te he dejado viene explicado que lo acordamos porque era el etiquetado que más se acercaba a la realidad.
El hecho de que se le llame metro no quiere decir que el etiquetado que se usa en OSM para metro sea el idóneo.
ralley (2020-03-22 05:49:51+00:00): Please note: playgrounds are not parks, they are different entities; "Small Childrens Playgound" is not the name, it is a description and redundant.  An entity cannot be a cliff and steps, they would be two different ways tagged differently (and probably orthogonal)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474690
ralley (2020-03-22 05:40:18+00:00): According to the AC Park Extents data set the only park/reserve here is Alan Tanner Reserve which is already on the map. I'm deleteing the park named "Intersection of Dakota Ave..."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474788
ralley (2020-03-22 05:42:36+00:00): Thank you for your other corrections in this changeset - they are appreciated.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474788
Kateregga1 (2020-04-30 16:15:23+00:00): Always map buildings with square corners
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82474816
Kovoschiz (2020-03-22 06:13:58+00:00): 1. Don't use `leisure=pitch` for the whole site. It is only for the pitch. 
2. Aren't Aberdeen Sports Ground and Wong Chuk Hang Indoor Games Hall separate?
jc86035 (2020-04-26 11:42:28+00:00): I've reverted part of this changeset to fix an area which was split into four.
Kovoschiz (2020-04-26 15:24:02+00:00): Oh thx I guess. I was going to take a look some time.
mueschel (2020-03-23 11:18:34+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what this node exactly is? Maybe you have a picture to show?

Let's see if I can help to find the proper tagging for this!

Jan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-22 13:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82483629 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 for more information.
joeybab3 (2020-03-28 05:05:28+00:00): If possible could you describe some of your change sets in a little more detail than "edits"? It would help to verify and can help others continue editing the areas you are improveing.
christiandflores (2020-03-28 05:58:00+00:00): No, join Waze if you want to be that anal
mapman44 (2020-03-28 14:09:11+00:00): christianflores, good changeset comments are a basic good practice in OSM. Please review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82476394
joeybab3 (2020-03-28 17:28:32+00:00): It takes 2 seconds to type something other than “edits”, for example “in this change set I marked an entire sidewalk as a street crossing for some reason” or “in this change set I deleted some on the ground tagging from someone who just visited the area to confirm this is the right way to tag it”. I’m not asking for much dude, and I’m not being anal about it either.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-22 13:50:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82483629 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 for more information.