piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_2066394 (2021-04-16 20:55:33+00:00): Wie kommt man aktuell z. B. zur Frühlingstraße 30?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/398160467
canfe (2021-04-18 07:14:54+00:00): Source_ref a cosa corrisponde?
Silco (2021-04-18 07:38:38+00:00): E' il codice CAI della sezione
canfe (2021-04-18 07:54:05+00:00): Secondo me è allora solo ref.
In tutta Italia mettete source?
Silco (2021-04-18 08:10:16+00:00): Si, souce:ref è la codifica prevista  dalle regole riportate nel Wiki dedicato al CAI https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI
canfe (2021-04-18 11:26:49+00:00): Credo che la cosa possa generare confusione. C'è un tag praticamente identico.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source_ref
canfe (2021-04-18 11:40:43+00:00): Ho scritto nella wiki in merito.
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-16 20:14:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 101791119, 101793529, 102936883, 102954381, 102954681, 102998366.
francians (2021-04-16 21:42:38+00:00): Grazie per il contributo e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!
Verifica le etichette, ci sono 2 building=bunker e 4 way senza etichette. Correggiamo il tipo di edifici (building=yes).
A presto
Francesco
francians (2021-04-16 21:46:00+00:00): Grazie per il contributo e benvenuta su OpenStreetMap.
I civici vanno messi su un nodo a parte che rappresenta l'ingresso, regola solo per l'Italia...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l.27Italia
A presto
Buona serata
Francesco
molibar (2021-04-17 06:16:08+00:00): Grazie, allora provo a rifare aggiungendo il nodo se riesco.
francians (2021-04-17 06:41:12+00:00): Perfetto 😉
portalaventura (2021-04-16 20:31:57+00:00): Boas-vindas Pedro Bade, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
redd (2021-04-25 15:48:55+00:00): Hi Rudi,
bitte stets einen Kommentar angeben, und nicht das Feld leer lassen. 
Zudem bitte auch die Quelle angeben, wie z.B. survey, local knowledge. 
Warum ist der Weg in diesem Fall nun als impassible getaggt worden? Ich frage wegen Nachvollziehbarkeit.
gruss,
redd
RudiIV (2021-04-25 20:13:05+00:00): Hallo Redd. Danke für den Hinweis. Werde in Zukunft es immer ergänzen. In der Regel bei mir Survey. Hier habe den Pfad so getaggt da ich ihn nicht gefunden hatte. Aber den Ausschlag gab ein Eintrag auf Komoot. Danach hab ich das Attribut gesetzt. Hast du einen anderen Eindruck von dem Pfad?
Gruß Rudi
RudiIV (2021-05-01 14:18:35+00:00): Hallo redd 
War heute mal vor Ort. Ich denke das war mal ein Rückeweg der aber mittlerweile wieder zuwächst. Ich habe jetzt das Attribut von Highway=Path auf Track geändert. Und von impassible auf horrible. Tracktype grade 5 passt meiner Meinung nach. Gruß Rudi
AgusQui (2021-04-17 04:53:17+00:00): Even though it is approved, the massive change is not correct.
colgza (2021-04-17 13:55:55+00:00): Okay, I will now stop attempting such mass edits.
colgza (2021-04-17 14:02:41+00:00): Should I reverse the change set?
AgusQui (2021-04-17 17:37:43+00:00): Yes. Changes must be made by local communities. It's going to take time, meanwhile you have to ask the different renderers to update.
AgusQui (2021-04-17 17:42:55+00:00): Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
colgza (2021-04-17 17:51:51+00:00): I actually made these edits manually, so I did not think to read through the Automated Edits Code of Conduct.
colgza (2021-04-17 17:53:46+00:00): I was just about to put a list of my own changesets into http://revert.osmz.ru/, but then I realized that I would be making the same mistake again. I would be rashly performing mass edits.
colgza (2021-04-17 17:56:11+00:00): The following is a list of changesets I was going to reverse:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103079524
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103079910
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103079869
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103080117
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103079656
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103080197
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103080458
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103080401
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103080369
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103080692
colgza (2021-04-18 14:50:27+00:00): This conversation has been referenced here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103064361
SomeoneElse (2021-04-18 19:02:36+00:00): Hi colgza,
If you want the DWG to help with a revert, drop a mail to data@openstreetmap.org
Cheers,
Andy
aweech (2021-04-17 18:29:00+00:00): Hi,
I've been seeing you add landcover here in the Fishlake area as it comes across one of my RSS feeds, and I just want to say thank you for all of your contributions in this area! It's some great stuff!
mottiger (2021-04-18 13:59:47+00:00): Hi there,
after mapping in India for a couple of years and setting up some maproulette tasks, I did some maproulette tasks in this region of the world. I was amazed that the quality of the imagery was so good (I am not used to this kind of quality) so I decided to map some natural=wood features.
Cheers
Reinhard12 (2021-04-18 12:35:54+00:00): Hallo Carsten, die Erfassung der Verkehrsinsel war doch gut so, nur die Busroute musste noch verlegt werden. Jetzt ist es schlechter als vorhor (Ampel fehlt, Haltestelle kaputt).
Gruß
Reinhard
Mannyy (2021-04-18 18:42:16+00:00): Von der Wasserstr. bis Auf dem Alten Kamp ist radfahren auf dem Gehweg (entgegen der Fahrtrichtung) erlaubt per "Radfahrer frei".  Dies gilt auch auf der Zufahrt nach Vonovia. Daher kann ich deine Änderung nicht nachvollziehen.
BS97n (2021-04-18 18:52:37+00:00): Ah, das ergibt dann auch Sinn. In cyclosm wurde der grüne Streifen nur in der Zufahrt angezeigt. Vermutlich, weil es dort nicht von cycleway:right=lane überlagert wird, sondern nur cycleway=lane (+bicycle:lanes) getaggt ist. Nur auf dem kurzen Stück dargestellt, sah das für mich jedenfalls wie ein Fehler aus. Als ich dann im vorbeifahren Stadteinwärts nur VZ 239 gesehen habe, fühlte ich mich darin bestätigt.

Dabei habe ich die Gegenrichtung überhaupt nicht bedacht und auch nicht angesehen.
BS97n (2021-04-18 18:59:26+00:00): Ganz richtig war es dann vorher aber trotzdem nicht. Wenn ich Stadteinwärts Nur VZ 239 gesehen habe, müsste der Bürgersteig nicht als sidewalk:right:oneway=no, sondern als sidewalk:right:oneway=-1 erfasst sein.

Ich passe das erstmal so an, schaue aber in den nächsten Tagen noch einmal genauer nach.
Mannyy (2021-04-19 08:16:33+00:00): Irgendwo in dem Streckenbereich ist noch ein Mappingfehler den ich noch nicht gefunden habe. Wenn du dir den Streckenverlauf mal vollständig anschaust.
https://routing.openstreetmap.de/?z=16&center=51.459261%2C7.238402&loc=51.457724%2C7.238123&loc=51.462737%2C7.233832&hl=de&alt=0&srv=1
Beide Richtungen müssten gleichermaßen möglich sein.. Ich vermute den Fehler im Bereich der Brücke A448. Solltest du fündig werden, bitte gerne eine Info an mich.
BS97n (2021-04-19 10:33:42+00:00): OSRM hängt immer ein bisschen hinterher. An der Brücke selbst war ich gar nicht dran.
Wenn es nächstes Wochenende nicht funktioniert, ist es wohl ein Fehler.
Vielleicht kommt OSRM aber auch nicht mit sidewalk:rigtht:oneway=-1 zurecht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 23:36:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105114877 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
joost schouppe (2021-05-18 12:56:55+00:00): looks good to me
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103081021
archpdx (2021-04-16 21:18:08+00:00): Spelling error in changeset comment, should say 'Mapped Gabbert Butte Nature Park'
abakus_uploader (2021-04-16 22:32:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Robert Whittaker (2021-05-09 08:38:52+00:00): Could you check the postcode of "KW17 2BB" for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931591884 ?

According to the centroids in Code-Point Open, KW17 2BB is located on Sanday not Westray. Perhaps the postcode should be KW17 2DD instead. See https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/KW/KW17/2/#2BB and https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/KW/KW17/2/#2DD
AgusQui (2022-02-28 21:50:12+00:00): el tag mail, como indica la wiki, se usa para indicar una línea principal: un ferrocarril con mayor tráfico y mayor velocidad que los ramales, a menudo de doble vía y/o electrificado, puede ser de alta velocidad, generalmente más largo que un ramal.
Esta definición no se corresponde con el ramal a Guido.
AgusQui (2022-02-28 21:50:25+00:00): main, no mail
mariotomo (2021-04-17 19:31:24+00:00): hola Braulio.  sería mejor poner la extensión, por cuanto aproximada, del cementerio, y marcarla como "landuse=cemetery".  la "amenity=grave_yard" está para cementerios asociados a iglesias.  que no sea relativo a una religión, puedes dejar la etiqueta "religion", o usar el valor inglés "none".
mariotomo (2021-04-17 19:42:28+00:00): sería este? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103115692
zmdaubs (2021-04-22 22:28:46+00:00): ???
map per (2021-04-29 14:46:05+00:00): Hello martianfreeloader,

this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/856232343) is neither a living_street nor a highway=pedestrian. It's a road that only busses (and taxis) are allowed to drive on. What about making it a highway=service?

Best wishes
map per
ich-ich-ich-ich-ich-ich (2021-04-29 18:57:24+00:00): Hi map per!

Yes, I think that's a good solution. It would be consistent with similar cases in
Zurich https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141054357
and Zagreb https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85449197

Others use "unclassified":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84668913
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/594209438
martianfreeloader (2021-04-29 19:26:28+00:00): Sorry the above comment was my alter ego :-)
map per (2021-04-29 19:37:10+00:00): I guess service, residential or unclassified woud all be fine
martianfreeloader (2021-04-29 20:25:18+00:00): Done.
Marco Garcea (2026-03-26 12:28:24+00:00): C'è un errore nella descrizione automatica: Il percorso escursionistico 124 parte da Bivio Strada Polsi nel comune di Orvieto (Umbria) e arriva a Casello San Giorgio.
In realtà siamo in Calabria e il comune di riferimento non è Orvieto ma San Luca.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-16 23:00:33+00:00): See also comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101460429
eggie (2021-04-17 05:28:52+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,

Tip.. Alleen een naam levert niets op in OSM. Je zult dan een combinatie moeten maken met shop= ?  craft, art ? 

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop#Art.2C_music.2C_hobbies

Zie ook Eigen bedrijf toevoegen 

https://www.onosm.org/ 

en 

 

https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/11/46.87897/8.23975 

 

En video Lucien 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6edDUi1o9RA 

 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-17 05:33:41+00:00): Voorlopig shop=hobby toegevoegd
eggie (2021-04-17 10:08:08+00:00): De 'verkeerde' vermelding in Mapbox staat los van de data van OSM.
Dat zal op een andere manier moeten worden opgelost.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-04-16 23:00:39+00:00): See also comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101460429
Gyrwa (2021-04-17 21:41:06+00:00): I am using the prow_ref format suggested by https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/oxon/
eggie (2021-04-17 05:19:55+00:00): Tip..
Die aparte parkeerplaatsen kunnen inderdaad zo, maar dan in combinatie met een groter vlak amenity=parking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space#When_not_to_use_amenity.3Dparking_space
Er wordt nog volop gebrainstormd over hoe parkeren langs de weg te mappen.
Zie ook parking:lane  en parking=street_side in de wiki.
Gr eggie
Iain I (2021-05-10 16:42:29+00:00): Isn't costco the large building to the south of this?
ToniE (2021-04-17 10:07:57+00:00): Servus rialex,

weißt du zufällig, zu welchem Verkehrsverbund die 9xxx-Busse gehören?

AVV, RAB, ...

network=Augsburger ...

network=Regional ...

Kennst Du PTNA? https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/

Viele Grüße,
Toni
rialex (2021-04-20 12:35:50+00:00): Hi Toni,

der Landkreis Dillingen gehört mit Ausnahme von Wertingen zu keinem Verbund. 

Nein kannte ich noch nicht. Danke für den Hinweis.
rialex (2021-04-20 12:42:35+00:00): Betrieben werden die Linien aber von RAB/Schwabenbus.
ToniE (2021-04-20 12:52:10+00:00): Danke,

ich glaube die Auswertung DE-BY-RAB bei PTNA behandelt auch keinen Verbund sondern eher den Betreiber RAB.

Man sieht's an der Liste der 'network'-Werte, die zulässig sind:

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-RBA-Analysis.html#networkdetails
os-emmer (2024-10-06 18:02:06+00:00): Hi bob3bob3,
I think you added this emergency=ses_station here originally:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189586983
Is it a station of the Queensland State Emergency Servcie? Do you know the name of the place? I can't find much on the internet.
bob3bob3 (2024-10-06 19:56:01+00:00): Hi os-emmer. This has sent me on quite an interesting search. The shed has a sign "Ilfracombe Joint Emergency Services" that includes the SES emblem. See the co-sited rural fire brigade Facebook photo set at https://www.facebook.com/ilfracomberuralfirebrigade/photos 45 approx frames down. The same shed has been upgraded from my 2021 Mapillary imagery where the sign is not readable.

I found a web note too that QLD legislation stops publishing station contact details, so online lists that might include an address have seemed to have been removed from the web.
os-emmer (2024-10-07 16:17:08+00:00): Thanks for the quick answer about this old changeset. Unfotunatly I can't access the pictures you linked to. But I found your mapillary pictures:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-23.488431249057072&lng=144.50855866951997&z=17.059982210472704&focus=photo&pKey=909248219654699&x=0.7393638063455327&y=0.5077163566828469&zoom=0.8297872340425534

So if I get you right it is unclear if there is just a fire station that is somehow connected to the SES or if there are a fire station and a SES station next to each other. Is that correct?
bob3bob3 (2024-10-07 18:07:41+00:00): The QFES/QFRS fire station and SES are in the same building. Both services are often co-sited and/or very close in smaller communities

Judging by the Facebook photo they are fully shared, so there is no actual building division. It may be best to change to a single building way and add/change to a node each for the fire station and SES. There are actually 3 emergency services logos on the sign. SES, QFRS and probably QFES.

The Mapillary images are quite old and not very clear!
os-emmer (2024-10-08 19:19:11+00:00): My understanding of the connections between fire fighting and the SES is very limited. If you feel confident that there is a fire station and a SES-station sharing a building than mapping them as seperate nodes in the same building sounds good.
francians (2021-04-17 05:43:14+00:00): Grazie per il tuo contributo!
Suggerisco di usare il name solo quando scritto esplicitamente (parcheggio Via Prezzo) e di fare i cancelli usando un solo nodo, così non bisogna modificarli per collegarli alla strada.

A presto
Francesco
Glassman (2021-04-17 00:07:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103084166
Glassman (2021-04-17 00:08:08+00:00): #TIP: if the building just contains one business you can just add the name and type of business tag to the building outline.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103084166
Glassman (2021-04-17 00:14:08+00:00): #TIP:  Instead of a descriptive name, use an appropriate tag. You can find more information on the wiki, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dswimming for information on how to tag a splash pad.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103084227
Glassman (2021-04-17 00:15:22+00:00): #TIP: Is the birthing center offered in the adjacent building, then you can just add a node to the center of the building. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103084300
user_5359 (2021-04-17 04:02:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your object please have a look on: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare%3Dmidwife
user_5359 (2021-04-17 03:57:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
BCNorwich (2021-04-17 07:05:17+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

On its own a name tag isn't much help to anyone and the description is not rendered so that's no help either. Is Wheatfields the name of the end house or the area? Also, do you have more of the property address available?

Regards Bernard.
PS I tweaked the pub tags and the pub outline.
user_11418917 (2021-04-17 22:21:33+00:00): Part of this changeset has been reverted due to spam. dont add spam again.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 23:52:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108549522 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some allegedly google-source changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105322114
syntex (2021-05-23 15:31:34+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś sąsiedztwo Tarki?
YacoobPL (2021-05-23 15:36:30+00:00): Omyłkowo, dziękuję za czujność!!!
syntex (2021-11-03 01:12:00+00:00): Dopiero teraz przeanalizowałem te zmiany i większość jest błędna. Po co przesuwałeś te punkty? W większości były one w dobrych miejscach. Taką Dąbrówkę Grzybowską przesunąłeś o 4 km od miejsca gdzie faktycznie się znajduje!
Rogoyski (2022-10-08 17:16:23+00:00): To samo z Brzezinami. Już w changesecie 83384639 tłumaczyłem, że to jest błąd. W ogóle utożsamianie punktu place=* z obszarem MSI (nawet noszącym tę samą nazwę) jest nieuprawnione. Obszar MSI opisujemy granicami i tyle. Punkt place=* nie jest etykietą dla obszaru MSI. I tak samo jak stolica kraju nie musi znajdować się w środku, tak osiedle nie musi znajdować się w środku obszaru, który bierze od niej nazwę.
Graciel (2021-12-30 22:27:33+00:00): Error
ZeLonewolf (2021-05-01 16:31:15+00:00): Hi, this change broke a city boundary:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10090463
portalaventura (2021-04-17 01:47:39+00:00): Boas-vindas Davizinho2021, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
DressyPear4 (2021-04-18 21:58:40+00:00): Olá, por que deletar as tags da rota de ônibus?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103085462
5m4u9 (2021-04-19 20:32:07+00:00): todo bien con las ediciones, pero las áreas de escuelas tienes que elegir el que diga "terreno de escuela" y no solo "edificio de escuela"
porfiriopaiz (2022-04-19 03:50:25+00:00): Hola ALEJO93.

Cuando agregues información, los nombres de los elementos deben ir en letras minúsculas. Únicamente la primer letra del nombre propio del primer elemento debe ser letra mayúscula.

Saludos y gracias por tu contribución.

Porfirio
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-13 10:32:11+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão criadas por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12591559

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12591560

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas (possuem uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essas restrições?
anderfo (2024-05-06 12:36:11+00:00): I changed mtb:scale = "mtb:scale:imba=2" (!) to mtb:scale:imba=2, but the original tag may have been set by someone without proper knowledge of these tags, so I hope some locals can verify the value...
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-13 10:34:15+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão criadas por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12591621

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12591623

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas (possuem uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essas restrições?
Scout Jens (2021-12-06 15:00:17+00:00): Der große Gebäude rechts sieht für mich eher aus wie ein Reitplatz. Warst Du vor Ort? Grüße, Jens
fx99 (2021-12-06 15:31:11+00:00): Da haben wir wohl beide teilweise recht. Nach Anschauen von Bing, Maxar und ESRI ist das im östlichen Teil ein Gebäude (Bing mit Schatten, Maxar Giebellinie sichtbar, ESRI fehlt) und der westliche ein Reitplatz.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 12:36:48+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!