piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-08-11 21:41:37+00:00): Naam van de fietsenmaker verwijderd van het hele industrieterrein

shop=bicycle toegevoegd + website.

Haal je zelf de shop=bicycle en name= van de adresnode Ploenstraat 11 na de verhuizing.

MVG
eggie
Verkehrsrot (2021-08-21 15:48:02+00:00): Der Seitenradweg an der B2 in der Ortslage Malchow existiert so nicht. Die Straße hat dort beidseitig Hochbord Rad- und Gehweg, nebeneinander, also getrennt.
kartograph (2021-08-21 16:31:17+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich erinnere mich nicht, dass ich einen Radweg/Gehweg entfernt hätte. Wenn dann versehentlich. Bezieht sich dein Hinweis hier auch auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2796361? Meinst du ergänzend, dass Rad- und Gehwege hier direkt an der B2 eingetragen werden sollten und nicht als separater Weg?
kartograph (2021-08-21 16:37:58+00:00): Sehe ich das richtig, dass der Fußweg durch Grünstreifen und Radweg von der B2 getrennt ist, also "Gehweg|Grün|Rad|Bordstein|B2|…" (symmetrisch)?
user_2066394 (2021-08-29 21:21:38+00:00): https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=98&error=130523585
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-11 23:48:41+00:00): I'm disappointed.
you edited in Finland and in Spain just to create a big bounding box surrounding half of the Europe.
Please, for now, don't edit in 2 places.
ramil (2021-08-12 03:47:23+00:00): Hello.
This was clearly not my intention. 
Didn't know that using this app "streetcomplete" would create this kind of changeset combination... 
But I need to ask why you are disappointed, what difference this makes?
Where this box can be seen elsewhere than when opening this changeset?
And maybe someone should mention this to the app developer, I am sure this could be prevented in the app, with some programming. 
From my part I can undo this if it is possible and makes any difference. Any idea how?
If you have time, tell me how it goes.
SekeRob (2021-08-12 06:40:13+00:00): SC tells the user to 'complete' where they are 'surveying', not where they were during the last vacation ;o). The nature of the beast is that it will come all edits of the same type consecutively i.e. surface and surface and surface. Set to auto save and map varying things and chances are things get split. When I use it I force reporting while on the move and even then same items get combined causing boxes villages apart. SC does so, level 0 editor does so too, so just don't is the advise and many will thank you who're only interested to see a history list end edit boxes that are relevant to their area.
cheers
ramil (2021-08-12 08:45:35+00:00): Good comment #SekeRob.
I already sent note to SC developer about the issue. 
But anyways, I promise to keep it local, one place at the time ;)
Thanks
westnordost (2021-08-12 09:46:52+00:00): Hey Ramil, author of StreetComplete here. You sent me an email about this. It's basically what SekeRob wrote:

StreetComplete quests should only be solved on-site. For editing on the computer, there are better (i.e. more efficient) tools. The app also tells you this when you try to solve a quest more than 50m or so away from your location and lets you confirm that indeed you checked it on-site.
This is to ensure that the data contributed with the app is of the highest quality: If you just checked something on-site, we can be sure it is this way, but if you just remember it (from your last vacation etc), you might misremember it, everyone might.

Now, in general, regardless of the map editor you use, it's not so good to group changes into one changeset that are geographically very far apart. Why? Because some people monitor a feed of changes in their area to help and resolve possible mistakes that are made by other (new) mappers. SekeRob maps in a small town on the east coast of Italia. Now, this changeset appeared in his feed, because it geographically spans so wide that it basically appears in everyone's feed in ~central Europe. This is because what changeset appears in whose feed is calculated not by the closest map data element changed, but whether the bounds of the changeset intersect with the area of interest - a simplification and performance improvement in implementation.

So for everyone who is notified of a new change in the area, it may take a moment to realize that after all, the changes are not relevant for his or her area, which is an inconvenience for those and thus should be avoided to be considerate of other mappers.

Cheers
Tobias
ramil (2021-08-12 10:18:35+00:00): Can this be undone? :(

Just testing the app. And for my defense i know the place very well...
mickul (2021-08-12 11:40:57+00:00): It can't, but hey, it's not big deal, just small, one-time inconvenience for other mappers. Thank you for your contributions and keep going! Greetings from Poland ;)
SekeRob (2021-08-12 12:58:39+00:00): It IS a deal when confronted with these a dozen times a day, and 90% always seem to come from the same corner on this planet. Maybe this could be made a talking point at the local chapters of OSM contributors. A permanent footnote on every wiki page. "Map Local in a session, map within your borders. U Too!"
westnordost (2021-08-12 12:59:52+00:00): Hey Ramil, sorry if it came across as rude, I just wanted to explain it in detail. I also think it is no big deal

Cheers
Tobias
neo-plan (2021-08-13 15:35:47+00:00): Знака может и нет, но есть чёткий круг дороги с неким подобием клумбы внутри.
ZooM (2021-08-13 16:46:18+00:00): Без знака - это 3 (или 4) Т-образных перекрёстка. "Клумбы" уже нет (завалено строительным мусором). Нужен мораторий на изменения, до окончания строительных работ.
neo-plan (2021-08-13 17:32:34+00:00): Работы запланированы на следующий год. Будет выравниваться линия улицы Дзержинского с Железнодорожной.
marc__marc (2022-08-29 13:52:56+00:00): Hello
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972377899
can you check if it's done ?
take care that the start date is start_date
while the estimated date for the end of the work and therefore the moment when the tags are changed is opening_date
Regards,
Marc
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:07:33+00:00): I don't think it is done yet
Larmax (2021-08-12 08:02:23+00:00): Hi, why did you remove the footway? There seems to be a sidewalk there based on Turku orthophoto.
ramil (2021-08-12 08:16:43+00:00): It has been removed with works still going on.
Larmax (2021-08-12 09:03:01+00:00): Is it being removed permanently or is it going to be rebuilt?
ramil (2021-08-12 09:19:45+00:00): The sidewalk I removed is already planted grass. The street and the other side are being finished. I try to get some photos... Passing there everyday...
Larmax (2021-08-12 12:09:17+00:00): Ok, no problem then. A better changeset comment would've clarified why the footway was deleted, ie "sidewalk has been removed/demolished"
ramil (2021-08-12 13:24:59+00:00): Ok thanks
https://westnordost.de/p/54116.jpg
map per (2021-09-19 11:36:09+00:00): Hello jemm,

are you sure thaz this really is a marina? I was there and the peir looked unused and shoaled. 

Best wishes
map per
map per (2021-10-02 07:24:25+00:00): I deleted the marina (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972380484)

Best wishes
map per
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-02-04 16:05:59+00:00): Você colocou que essa via é pavimentada e não é! Segundo: voce nomeou esta via toda como Estrada Faz El Shadai, como se toda esta via fosse apenas de uma fazenda, que não é também. Terceiro: o nome Faz abreviado, não deve ser assim. estou desfazendo algumas coisas aqui
iWowik (2021-08-12 07:12:02+00:00): День добрый!

Заметил несколько ошибок в ваших правках
Характерный пример:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972381730

1) Вы пишете addr:street=Сельская


А Сельская что?: Аллея, набережная, линия или может площадь?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

2) Вы пишете addr:housenumber=1б
А принято писать в номере заглавную букву
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.9D.D1.83.D0.BC.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.BE.D0.B2

3) Вы пишете name=1б
Не надо писать номер дома в виде его названия. Это же вовсе не название дома или , к примеру, магазина в нем расположенного
Kirilll_B (2021-09-07 19:05:39+00:00): После стольких правок я понял как смотреть комментарии к ним... стыдно.. Огромное спасибо за рекомендации. Исправлю.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-08-13 08:39:33+00:00): Ciao Michele. Se gli edifici hanno delle parti in comune, perché tu li disegni staccati? Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109538272
kogutowicz-mano (2022-12-28 11:51:24+00:00): Szervusz! A 25 kV nem túl valószínű. A környéken 11 kV a középfeszültség, és az alállomásnak a vasúthoz sincs köze. Honnan származik az információ?
Digilazarus (2022-12-29 11:30:04+00:00): Szervusz! Valóban igazad lehet, most utánanéztem a lehetséges forrásomban (MAVIR Üzemi Szabályzat melléklete, 2018), és nem találtam benne semmit, amit így érthettem volna, így hibás gépelés (vagy egy MÁV alállomás értékének téves másolása?) lehet részemről, elnézést. Jó, hogy kiszúrtad!
Digilazarus (2022-12-29 11:36:20+00:00): Most javítottam 11 kV-ra, ez a 25-nél tényleg nagyobb valószínűséggel igaz aztán majd megpróbálom leellenőrizni.
jeslop (2021-08-12 08:08:01+00:00): Hola Luis, gracias por colaborar con OSM. El hórreo se debe mapear según lo indicado en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Caracter%C3%ADsticas_que_generan_dudas_en_España#H
Lo cambio para que veas como queda. 
Saludos.
bxl-forever (2021-08-15 11:32:43+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.

There is something a bit strange about the small building here, which is part of your changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243540436/history

amenity=event_venue
+ the name suggests it is a warehouse to store dangerous goods.

Is that the real name of the place where they hold events?  I fear we may be mixing two different kinds of things here, but maybe you have some information about what it really is nowadays.

What do you think?
JhowieNitnek (2021-08-15 13:41:11+00:00): It is indeed the name. It was a warehouse when it was still a railyard but now it's a conference center but still with the same name.
bxl-forever (2021-08-15 18:12:02+00:00): OK, good, then.
brianboru (2021-08-12 15:01:22+00:00): Please stop what you are doing until you know better. You have deleted a section of the River Corve and removed many relations that were were a result of a day's work. I shall probably revert this entire edit
brianboru (2021-08-14 09:02:38+00:00): No responsefrom you so changeset reverted
kartonage (2021-08-14 09:34:51+00:00): Hej,

it seems you duplicate already existing buildings creating them at the exact same position.

Please don't do it. It serves no purpose and creates more work for others to clean it up.

Thank you.
user_17724595 (2022-12-16 21:41:43+00:00): Why did you rename 'Parrish Street' to '=='?
archpdx (2021-08-12 05:53:30+00:00): Really appreciate you taking the time to add all these addresses in North Bethany and the ones in River Terrace a couple months ago
tguen (2021-08-12 06:10:22+00:00): We're lucky to have ODbL data from Metro. Importing it is a good way to kill a couple hours when I'm bored. :)
RedAuburn (2021-08-12 00:06:27+00:00): #FixingStIves
RedAuburn (2021-08-12 00:47:42+00:00): Turns out the name is Harbour Beach, so added it in another changeset
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-12 03:34:54+00:00): Hello again,

The correct tagging for driveways is highway=service and service=driveway. You've added a lot of these kinds of features as residential roads which is not correct.

Searching driveway in the iD editor will bring up the preset for you when you're tagging.

Have you checked out the OSM wiki yet? It's a great resource that might help you a lot with how to tag things correctly:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
CRD_Oni (2021-08-12 03:49:54+00:00): Hey there! 

Thank you for reaching out. This is the first time I am using the service. I will review the wiki and see how to tag things more accurately. Any other suggestions are welcome. 

John
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-12 04:02:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM, John!

Thanks for your reply and for being open to feedback!

Another suggestion I have is to square up your buildings. In iD, you can select a feature and press the "Q" key on your keyboard to do this. 
Alternatively, you can right-click a feature and then select the relevant square button that pops up. 
Take your time doing this, it's a little extra effort but accurate buildings look so much better.

Are the paths you've added between houses publicly accessible? If they aren't, I'd suggest marking them as private. I'm also not sure if they'd all actually be considered paths based on imagery - are they all actively designated and used pathways or are they just places you could possibly walk through (like any open space?)
CRD_Oni (2021-08-12 04:15:46+00:00): I did see the "Square area" option. I will work on retagging everything and squaring tomorrow. The pathways listed are how the parish/town get back to the waterway back there to clear it out and do maintenance. Its one reason we dont have a fence, let me know if there is a tag that would work better that you know of. Thanks for the feedback and I can continue working on this area hopefully.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-12 05:12:40+00:00): Hmm, I'm not sure regarding the pathways. Personally, I probably still wouldn't add them unless they were clearly visible.

You could walk through a field to access a stream but it doesn't make the whole field a path, if you get what I mean?

If they're on private property, at minimum, I'd definitely set access restrictions, because the way it reads at the moment, they're openly accessible. OSM is used by a lot of hiking apps, so you probably don't want to give people the wrong impression.
CRD_Oni (2021-08-12 13:52:17+00:00): I have gone back in and made the changes we talked about, driveways, etc. Also, I have marked the pathways private just for clarification for hikers, per your recommendations. Thank you for your help!
Lee Carré (2021-08-12 01:37:25+00:00): How's this an improvement, precisely?

The tags you removed from the building (relation) do actually apply to the building.

PoI nodes are used either when something is very small, is a feature within a building (short of doing proper indoor mapping) or as a quick & dirty method of marking something significant (e.g. because its host building hasn't yet been added).

Replacing building-tagging with node-tagging makes little sense.

Also, what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
KheOps (2021-08-14 02:05:31+00:00): The building contains a bit of private housing too, not all of it is dedicated to hosting guests of the hostel. As far I remember guidelines, in such case the tags should be given to a node placed within the building, close to where the access is. Also, it wasn't tagged as a hostel, among missing tags. I hope this clarifies the improvement I claimed to do. If not, feel free to either revert all the changes or keep the discussion going — with less hostility though.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-12 03:31:53+00:00): Hi, 

You're adding a lot of natural water circles (such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972413110)

These actually appear to be pools, which have their own tagging scheme, leisure=pool (found in the iD editor by searching "pool")

You've also added small sections of grassland in a location that appears to be maintained... grassland is typically used for natural grassland areas such as the Prairie or the Plains of Mongolia.
zluuzki (2021-08-12 06:55:10+00:00): You created node #9.000.000.000!
Nice! www.osm.org/node/9000000000
adiatmad (2021-08-12 07:05:51+00:00): \ (•◡•) /
Nicely done!
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-15 11:39:31+00:00): Congrats!
unfortunately, you only used hashtag changeset comments.
it would been great if you commented
"Added more buildings"
or something similar.
ivanbranco (2021-09-19 07:16:36+00:00): Hi aharvey,

what's the meaning of disguised=yes to this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972413605 ?
aharvey (2021-09-19 09:16:35+00:00): There were a bunch of pot plants and other material put there so it was not obvious there was a path here, probably the nearby resident placed these here to disguise the legally accessible path. If you didn't know there was a path (and didn't see the sign) you'd think you were walking into someones backyard.
Kovoschiz (2021-08-18 03:57:10+00:00): 1. Please don't simply add `railway=*` to non-existent features. This is vandalism. 
2. This is going to be a `=rail`, not `=subway`. The historic compromise was using `route=subway` (instead of `=train`) on `railway=rail`.
MxxCon (2021-08-12 03:17:17+00:00): Hello.
Please note that Organic Maps app doesn't show the current live map. Every once in a while they update map database file and release it for download.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109542646
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 21:55:34+00:00): Good changeset, just a few things I want to point out:

- If you map a building and there's already an address node on it, you can copy the tags from the old node to the new building, and delete the node. This is preferred for simple buildings like houses.
- The cemetery probably shouldn't be connected to the house building there.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109542699
branmevans (2022-09-05 02:12:03+00:00): Deleting all of the way and nodes have removed the history. This can lead to problems of not know what is changed. Also most issues can be fixed with out having to delete nodes. In the process pf deleting things it appears that newer campus updates were removed. I advise to be careful with mass deletions in the future and to leave a comment if something looks different. A lot of the information and unconnected ways were from local surveying of the area.
cserpell (2021-08-12 20:57:56+00:00): Hola Gustavo!

Gracias por los cambios, mejoré tu cambio de la siguiente forma, para mejorar la calidad:

- Coloqué tilde a "García".
- Marqué como solo sentido hacia el norte el lado oriente de la calle.
- Alinié los objetos a las calles y objetos ya existentes. Es importante ser consistente con lo que hay alrededor.

Cualquier cosa, no dudes en contactar a la comunidad OSM en telegram @OSMcl o en la lista de correos y facebook que aparecen en www.openstreetmap.cl .

Saludos,
felipeeugenio (2021-08-12 13:22:59+00:00): Estimado, cuando elimine nodos para dibujar poligonos se puede conservar la información. Revisando el nodo y el poligono, hay información que simplemente se perdió. O está obsoleta? por favor cuidado con esas cosas.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109543157
aifuenzalidag (2021-08-12 13:40:28+00:00): Hola Felipe, estuve revisando como modificar un punto a un poligono, pero no logré realizar ese cambio, por lo que hice el borrar y crear nuevo elemento. Voy a revisar bien la info que me comentas, para no cometer errores.
Baloo Uriza (2021-08-12 16:23:57+00:00): This one's good-ish.  Adjusting corners to line up would be ideal when using RapID to pull in building outlines, since it's often a little off.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109544106
angys (2021-08-12 11:28:53+00:00): Hello, do you want to add school into osm?
Vulcanodong (2021-08-12 09:40:39+00:00): 即将拆建 再建设的土地使用 construction的tagging并没有问题,不要看界面的翻译 要看tagging的定义
user_11435438 (2021-08-15 11:19:44+00:00): 那这个就是brownfield，您可以再了解下其它标签
ftrebien (2021-08-12 15:08:33+00:00): Acredito que possa ter sido um engano, mas você excluiu as duas quadras finais da Gomes Jardim e também a via motorizada da Alcides da Cunha. Na realidade, as duas se interceptam. Essas vias tinham o material da superfície já mapeado (paralelepípedos), e a Gomes Jardim tinha o limite de velocidade também mapeado (30). Por favor, restaure essas informações.
RPG Tesouros D'Orixá (2021-08-12 20:07:22+00:00): Boa tarde
Obrigada pelos teus comentários e observações. Estamos trabalhando com a maior rapidez possível para conferir maior fidelidade à nova estrutura arquitetônica do local, entretanto, haviam inúmeros pontos soltos e outras estruturas de áreas equivocadas. Ao suprimir algumas informações, outras declinaram mas criamos backups com os dados anteriores e assim poderemos refazê-los.
TD8WbsJi (2022-06-11 19:41:18+00:00): Der Kastanienweg existiert vor Ort nicht. Auch im Bebauungsplan kann ich ihn nicht als Vorsehung finden. Ist noch bekannt, woher die Info kam?
zstadler (2022-02-22 12:56:12+00:00): הי,

בעדכון הזה תיקנת את המעבר של סינגל הנוקדים על יד כפר הנוקדים ועכשיו הוא לא עובר בשביל שמסומן ירוק:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300173791

האם גם הסימון הירוק עבר?
Tsur Halamish (2022-02-25 06:25:05+00:00): אין לי מושג לגבי הסימון הירוק.
כשרכבנו שם התרכזנו רק בשילוט של האופניים
zstadler (2022-02-25 11:30:48+00:00): תודה
zstadler (2023-04-13 08:29:05+00:00): אתה בטוח שיש סימון של מעבר חציה כאן?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9000206824

אני לא רואה סימון כזה בתצלומי הלווין של
OSM
וגם לא ב 
https://www.govmap.gov.il/?c=225884.38,579484.59&z=10&b=1

אם זו סתם צומת, אין צורך לציין highway=crossing
iWowik (2021-08-12 07:19:08+00:00): День добрый!

Я вам уже писал про ошибки
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109462724

У вас опять 
addr:street=Промышленная

Ну как догадываться людям, а особенно программам
Промышленная это что?
Промышленная аллея, Промышленная набережная, Промышленная линия или может Промышленная площадь?
iWowik (2021-08-12 08:39:15+00:00): А что  это за объект?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972440828
Prot (2021-08-12 08:47:29+00:00): Это заброшенная АЗС, есть фото. К какому типу зданий отнести не знаю.
iWowik (2021-08-12 11:38:34+00:00): Навскидку abandoned:building=yes 
Ну и abandoned:amenity=fuel
ivanbranco (2021-08-22 09:40:28+00:00): Hi afnn,

what the point of the x:-2021=* tags if nothing had changed? I would expect a surface=* tag together with surface:-2021=* tag, meaning that this year the surface changed. But this way looks like nothing changed, and every year you should remember to change all the tags you used to -2022 ecc.
afnxn (2021-08-23 04:35:38+00:00): Hello. I've found the only way to write information of life cycle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts
x:-2021=* means that x was * until 2021
Baloo Uriza (2021-08-12 16:21:40+00:00): Spur 30 is one of the Texas secondary highways, which is third level.  It's not a particularly well travelled route, so I don't really think upgrading it was particularly warranted.  In general if there's two highway=* values that could apply, the lower of the two is probably the better option.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109548272
Joseph R P (2021-08-12 17:00:11+00:00): If it is a secondary route, shouldn't it use secondary tags then, or at least from where it was tagged as trunk to the next highway ramp?
Baloo Uriza (2021-08-12 17:14:59+00:00): US would be primary, the main state highways would be secondary and secondary state highways tertiary.
Joseph R P (2021-08-13 01:16:15+00:00): That doesn't look like the case though since just above this location is TX 152 tagged as primary, and exploring the rest of Texas many of the other main state highways are primary and Farm-to-Market roads (which are usually secondary or minor roads) are secondary.
Baloo Uriza (2021-08-13 02:21:18+00:00): The US in general suffers from upward classification creep in general, but Texas definitely has a pretty severe case of it.  Good rule of thumb is if there's multiple possible classifications, the safest bet is the lowest sensible option.  Most people and routers don't really care about nitpicking at the low end, but on long distances, how the high end gets classified matters quite a bit for more rapid elimination of lower quality routes.