piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-05-11 20:31:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
OttawaHiking (2019-08-19 03:41:05+00:00): Hello. In the park relation there are two very similar outer ways 507025219 and 689335542. This cannot be right. Only one of the two is expected there. Which one would you pick? Both of them are not so good as per park's website the park occupies 525 hectares but measuring it with either of the two ways gives a larger area.
frosm (2019-05-15 23:51:28+00:00): Bonjour,
la position du loueur de voiture en plein milieu des pistes est fantaisiste.
pouvez-vous le mettre à sa bonne position ? à défaut je le supprimerai
BCNorwich (2019-06-12 17:55:54+00:00): Hi, regarding Way: 686353074 the tag incline=steep is not recognised by OSM. You need to have a value for incline as mentioned in this link :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-06-17 06:44:36+00:00): No response so I've changed tag to a description=steep incline.
Megachip (2020-03-08 09:33:24+00:00): Nur leider braucht nominatim diese "veralteten" Tags immer noch um korrekt aufzulösen :(
streckenkundler (2020-03-08 10:50:23+00:00): Das Problem ist, daß im is_in teilweise hoffnungslos veraltete und nicht mehr stimmende Angaben drin stehen. 
Bei der Grenzdichte, die wir hier haben, sollte is_in obsolet sein. Vergleiche Wiki.. In Josm wird Is_in als veraltet geführt. Im Übrigen ist die Frage, ob die noch vorzufindenen is_in-Werte, die Kommagetrennt sind, überhaupt zulässig sind. Laut Wiki müssen sie Semikolongetrennt sein... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in

Sven
Martin Borsje (2019-05-12 05:47:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
rubasov (2019-09-02 04:49:49+00:00): A napokban (2019-09-01) jartam a Dregelyvar-Saferkut kozotti turistauton. Ezen a szakaszon csak a piros kereszt jelzest lattam felfestve (nagyon frissnek latszott). Zold jelzest viszont egyet sem. Nehol voltak szurkere lefestett jelzesek - nem tudtam kivenni, mi volt a szurke festek alatt.

Nemreg ota szerkesztem az OSM-et, ugyhogy gondoltam eloszor kerdezek: Jo otlet-e kivenni a most bejart szakaszt a Zoldutak 1 relaciobol?
mgpx (2019-09-02 09:35:43+00:00): Ez a módosításcsomag kettébontott egy relációk által érintett útszakaszt, így technikailag revíziózta azokat, de a nyomvonalukat nem változtatta. A zöld út jelzést én sem láttam ezen az útszakaszon.

Pár jelzésrendszer már a tervek alapján felkerült az OSM-re, hogy a felfestés befejezése előtt is be lehessen járni GPS-szel, pl. a Mária-utak. Valószínűleg ez is így került ide, esetleg Dömcsinél rá lehet kérdezni.

Én egyéni gerillaakcióval nem kezdeném ezeket leszedegetni, hátha használja valaki. De a levlistára be lehetne dobni, hogy mit gondol az OSM közösség, meddig őrizgessük a tervezett de végül fel nem festett útszakaszokat.
rubasov (2019-09-02 11:13:00+00:00): Koszonom, igy mar ertem, hogy ez meg csak tervezett turistaut. Akkor semmikepp nem torlok belole. Akkor esetleg 'proposed'-nak lehetne megjelolni?
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-12 07:01:23+00:00): #test #failed ?

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70147997

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
PT-53 (2019-05-19 11:15:25+00:00): Hallo GarryX3D,
Du hast diese Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37777648/history mit access=no voll gesperrt.
Ist dort eine Baustelle?
Wo gibt es Infos dazu?
Fragende Grüße
GarryX3D (2019-05-19 12:37:36+00:00): Hallo PT-35,

Info etwas versteckt unter
https://www.oetigheim.de/pb/2592343.html

Neuer Radweg entlang des Gewerbegebietes an der alten B 36
 
Die Arbeiten zur Schaffung eines Radweges entlang des Gewerbegebietes an der ehemaligen B36 laufen auf Hochtouren und liegen voll im Zeitplan. Aktuell wird der Unterbau für die Fahrbahn eingebaut. Die Maßnahme wurde in das Förderprogramm für die Anlage kommunaler Rad- und Fußverkehrsinfrastruktur nach dem Landesgemeindeverkehrsfinanzierungsgesetz (LGVFG) aufgenommen und wird zu 50% vom Land Baden-Württemberg bezuschusst. Damit wird der langersehnte Lückenschluss entlang der alten B36 für Radfahrer endlich realisiert.
Offizielle Terminangaben habe ich keine, habe die Sperrung vor Ort letzte Woche aufgenommen.
PT-53 (2019-05-19 14:07:25+00:00): Hallo GarryX3D, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Wie lange etwa wird die Sperrung dauern?
Fragende Grüße
GarryX3D (2019-05-19 19:56:36+00:00): Wie gesagt habe ich noch keine offiziellen Angaben. Die Absperrung sah frisch aus und ich konnte noch keine Bauaktivitäten erkennen - daher rechne ich mit 3-6monatiger Sperrung.
PT-53 (2019-05-20 05:56:26+00:00): Hallo GarryX3D, 
Ich bin über das Tool QS Fernwegenetz
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14  /  
http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=15/8.2438/48.8832&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json
auf die Baustelle aufmerksam geworden.

Ich werden den Hinweis - beim nächsten auftauchen - für 6 Monate ausblenden.

Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-11 22:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70148669 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-11 22:37:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70148669 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-11 22:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70148669 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
finelyrefined (2019-05-11 22:21:38+00:00): Comment revised.
smaprs (2019-05-11 23:53:07+00:00): Good. Also nice if you can add its "website=*"
Dimacn (2019-05-12 13:24:25+00:00): Спасибо за улучшение карты OSM. Но к вам есть пара замечаний. 1. В name пишем только официальное название, а не описательные характеристики. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  2. Дворовая территория - это не парк отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста исправьте.
Dimacn (2019-05-12 13:26:54+00:00): 3. Вы ошибочно удалили со здания школы тег building=school  Оно что, перестало быть зданием. Пожалуйста верните.
Constable (2019-06-22 16:25:18+00:00): Hi there,welcome to OSM!
We have a note pointing out a name you added might be incorrect, could you please have a look here https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1821342 and give us a bit more details about your edit?
thanks!
b-jazz (2019-05-13 19:01:29+00:00): Are you aware that the boundaries for Steger and Crete are now overlapping and intertwined on the map? There are some places that are in both counties/cities(?) and some that are in neither. Check around node 387582757 for an example.
I have no idea what it should look like so I'm hesitant to fix it. Hopefully you know better.
sannkc (2019-05-14 06:02:11+00:00): Thanks for pointing those out.  I hadn't spotted them yet, but it appears to be the same kind of problem that I was working on earlier, for the cities to the west.  It seems like either the TIGER data was a bit faulty, or perhaps just not precise enough for all the twists and turns that these Chicagoland cities have made to their boundaries.  I'll look into it and see if I can make some improvements.
sannkc (2019-05-17 01:37:02+00:00): Updates now completed (changeset #70339468).
b-jazz (2019-05-17 03:33:12+00:00): Thanks @sannkc!
viloan (2019-05-11 22:32:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-11 22:37:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 70148178, 70148180, 70148182, 70148187, 70148192, 70148195, 70148196, 70148222.
santamariense (2019-05-12 00:47:05+00:00): Olá! Não existe mais aquela ponte/pinguela na Rua Nova Prata, em Santa Maria?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70148910
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 00:26:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70149719 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 00:26:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70149719 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
chachafish (2019-06-06 17:16:33+00:00): Hello, there are some untagged lines inside the Saint Anne's Episcopal School, school grounds. Did you mean for these lines to represent something? Thanks.
DaveF (2022-07-04 14:02:35+00:00): Hi
You've tag a few waterway=yes in this area. Any idea what type they are it would be great if you could get them to render.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jR5
TravGW (2019-05-12 00:27:57+00:00): If I'm reading your description correctly, you are saying your house floods on a daily basis. Is this correct? Are you saying when the tide comes in, the water rises high enough to reach the road? What about your pool that is under construction? Will dirty bay water spill into it on a daily basis or is it an above ground pool?
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:05:31+00:00): The pool, I keep trying to delete.    But it won't me.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:55:38+00:00): Pool is something that will be above ground.  But I have to do some other improvements prior.    Hence why I originally had it as a construction area.
TravGW (2019-05-12 00:30:49+00:00): Why is the park now a wetland? Is it no longer suitable for use as a park? If it is a wetland then no one use the baseball fields or the playground or any other open grassy area due to all the mud and the park should be deleted.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:03:54+00:00): The park is in the 100 yeard flood plane, it is located on waterfront property on Brackish waters..   You can have more uses than one for areas...    Google Chesapeake bay.     The watershed and wetlands covers a ton of Maryland....
TravGW (2019-05-12 00:33:47+00:00): I see you've also added grass to your wetland. It would be better if you used one of the wetland tags as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:01:17+00:00): How do you get wetlands and grass to work together?    It is a salt marsh wetland area.    Not sure how to classify grass as well.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:09:08+00:00): It would be based on Tidal yes.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:57:47+00:00): The outdoor patio by the pier.   If you play ingress, you can see it clearly.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:58:13+00:00): The pond area.   I can show you on my facebook.   Plenty of pictures when I created it.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:59:44+00:00): wetlands use should be allowed on all waterfront property in maryland.    

Grass should be allowed on residential properties where grass exists...
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 02:08:33+00:00): Go to baltimore county zoning.   You can see  see the property is broken down into 2 lots.   Lot closest to the water has the same classification as the park.   Making the ground use on the property also being park although it would be considered a private park on each residence....
SomeoneElse (2019-05-12 10:48:35+00:00): @abriel0322 County Zoning is pretty much irrelevant for OSM.  There's a huge difference between "might flood every now and again" and the sorts of wetland you've been trying to map it as.  It's clear from "If you play ingress, you can see it clearly" above that you're just mapping things here for a game.  Please don't do that.
As I've said numerous times by email already, try and put yourself in the mind of other people looking at your edits.  If what you do fails the verifiability test and looks like you're just mapping for Ingress, your changes will be reverted.  It doesn't matter how many times you try and make the changes; they'll keep on being reverted.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 10:52:40+00:00): I can't help ingress has a more up to date satellite feed.  Yes it can be seen there.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 10:58:11+00:00): Yes the yard floods depending on the rain, tides, etc...wetlands all water front deals with it on a regular basis.     How is it my fault, you guys aren't familiar with water front property and classifications.  Zoning maps they are being using to identify the school grounds.   Why are you saying they they can't do the same with private residences and private parks?
SomeoneElse (2019-05-12 11:03:35+00:00): So does mine, but it's not "wetland"!

Again, as I've said in emails too numerous to mention, saying things like "you guys aren't familiar with..." will simply ensure that you edits get reverted every time.  If you're happy to keep banging your head against that particular brick will, carry on - all that'll happen is you'll get a headache.  If instead you want your changes to stay in OSM, you have to ask yourself "how would someone else map this" and "what should I say so that it doesn't look like I'm just mapping for Ingress/Pokemon Go/whatever".
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 11:04:14+00:00): Google the Chesapeake bay.   @someone else, you were provided with documentation and picture proof.  You could map my property with everything, but choose not to do anything and instead be a pain and watch everything be in a constant reverting loop.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 11:07:02+00:00): All of maryland waterfront property is considered a wetland....     not just mine.    It should be fixed....    as well as if it has grass it ahould be allowed.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 11:14:05+00:00): Travgw his profile even says he does things for pokemon.  How am i doing anything wrong.  Its my property that i am updating.  Just because i spent more on my yard then most to have things to enjoy.  It should be allowed to be update on OSM when they exist....
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 11:24:50+00:00): @someone you have the picture proof of everything on the property...    So why aren't you put the things...   

You have the proof of what is considered to be a wetland by the chesapeake bay...   So how are you arguing it isn't a wetland?   

Just because you guys can't have it, doesn't mean it is wrong and I can't.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-12 11:41:18+00:00): > Just because you guys can't have it, doesn't mean it is wrong and I can't. 

Like I said before, you can carry on like this and your updates will fail to stay in OpenStreetMap, or you can take a step back, try and look at things from the point of view of other people.  It's up to you.
LeifRasmussen (2019-05-12 11:48:31+00:00): Floodplains should not be mapped as wetlands - there is a proposal for mapping them here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/floodplain
TravGW (2019-05-12 13:14:45+00:00): Where does it say I've added to the map for Pokemon? The only place where I talk about Pokemon is in my changesets when I'm reverting bad edits.
TravGW (2019-05-12 13:19:47+00:00): >"The outdoor patio by the pier. If you play ingress, you can see it clearly."

The only time ingress has satellite imagery when you are viewing the intel map or adding a portal. This that why you have tagged the cannon and flag pole? Are you trying to add them as portals? That won't work. Anyone reviewing potential portal candidates will see they are on private property and immediately 1 star them.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 14:35:12+00:00): If the park is clearly drawn as highlighted in the baltimore county zoning map.  They would be allowed.  But seeing it, gives you proof you needed.  They can be viewed on the intel map.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 14:38:04+00:00): Trav check your profile.
viloan (2019-05-12 00:27:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 00:26:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 70148997, 70148999, 70149002, 70149008.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 01:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70150015 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 01:05:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70150015 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
scai (2019-10-04 10:52:12+00:00): Hi Crumbleman,

cycleways have to be connected to the rest of the road network. Otherwise routers can't use them. I fixed this for you by adding missing connections.

Regards
Alex
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:18:00+00:00): Why was actual things that exist in real life deleted?
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:17:25+00:00): what was cleaned up?   And why was actual things removed?  Just because the satellite is out of date since I owned the property.
iandees (2019-05-12 01:31:40+00:00): You added parking spaces where driveways are, so I converted them back into driveways. Also, footways are designated paths for foot traffic, not grass.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70149981
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:37:15+00:00): It's not just grass...     I understand what a walkway is.    I have one for access to the pier.    It's not my fault the satellite field is older than 2015.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 01:38:20+00:00): PM me your email address.  I will send you picture proof....
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 01:05:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 70149825, 70149828, 70149835.
viloan (2019-05-12 01:17:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 01:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70150180 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 01:35:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70150180 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
viloan (2019-05-12 01:34:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 01:35:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 70150113, 70150115.
literan (2019-05-14 17:48:55+00:00): добрый день. Не надо, пожалуйста, рисовать кладбища внутри другого кладбища. Для секторов можно использовать тег cemetery=sector. Исправил
norD79 (2019-05-14 19:00:09+00:00): Большое спасибо. Хотел, но не догадался как. Век живи, век учись
mavl (2019-05-12 04:59:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70151251 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-05-12 04:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70151251 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-05-12 04:59:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70151251 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].