piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
geow (2016-12-23 19:08:10+00:00): Hi Christian, danke für das Feedback. Ich denke inhaltlich ist hier alles gesagt. 

Bitte versuche zu akzeptieren, dass wir Steigspuren und sogar weglose Abschnitte wiki-konform in OSM erfassen können. 

Deine Einschätzung bzgl. dieser Wegführung ist widersprüchlich zu Netzwolfs Angaben, die vertrauenswürdig und vor allem aktueller sind. Bei der momentanen Schneelage lässt sich das leider nicht überprüfen.

Netzwolfs Beiträge in dieser Diskussion waren sachlich und nachvollziehbar und keineswegs arrogant. 

Frohe Weihnachten 
Klaus
Carlos Brys (2016-11-19 14:13:21+00:00): Cambio la etiqueta del tipo de nodo, porque no existen cañanas alpinas en Formosa
La paso a tourism=chalet
user_5359 (2016-11-19 13:46:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 12:15:53+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Supaplex (2016-11-19 13:52:51+00:00): 有名稱嗎？
Supaplex (2016-11-27 19:06:43+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-11-19 13:47:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 12:16:40+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
naoliv (2016-12-13 11:30:25+00:00): O que é esse monte de objeto que você inseriu?
Geogast (2017-01-01 21:12:37+00:00): é um problema conhecido mapeando com MAPS.ME: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits#Wrong_Tagging
Geogast (2017-01-05 12:54:20+00:00): outra duvida que tenho: me parece que todos estes POI virão de uma fonte, não de investigação nos lugares. É preciso ver si a fonte (caso tiver) é legal.
naoliv (2017-01-05 13:19:02+00:00): É bem estranho mesmo.
Igual o changeset #39627841
Será que tem como importar dados dentro do maps.me e depois enviar ao OSM?
Me parece difícil a pessoa digitar no celular tantos dados dessa maneira.
Geogast (2017-01-05 13:22:06+00:00): olha só:
https://ruas-brasil.openalfa.com/microrregi%C3%A3o-de-alto-teles-pires/alojamento
Geogast (2017-01-05 13:23:50+00:00): o camping (bem abaixo nessa pagina) tambem esta, veja changeset 40122080
Geogast (2017-01-05 13:25:36+00:00): Ah, parece que confundi ovo e galinha: na pagina diz que são dados vue vem de OSM, não ao contrario
Carlos Brys (2016-11-19 14:18:01+00:00): Cambie el nodo de punto a "negocio" y completé algunos datos desde la pagina web
nyuriks (2017-03-02 07:32:10+00:00): Hi, i corrected some tags from this patch, especially n3276552767,n3276552770,n3276552771 -- but there is still a minor problem -- these are the only wikimedia_commons tags that use a search url instead of a proper Commons title like category:* or file:*. Could you change wikimedia_commons tag on these nodes to a category or an image? Or if they don't exist, lets delete those tags. Thanks!
Hjart (2016-11-19 17:22:24+00:00): Som uerfaren har du selvfølgelig ikke bemærket det, men de fleste af de cykelstier/baner var i forvejen markeret med et "cycleway=lane/track" på selve bilvejen. Dette kan ses på blandt andet vores cykelkort, der kan vælges i menuen til højre på siden her: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/55.6485/12.5408&layers=C. Når du laver cykelstier vil det som oftest være en god ide at læse https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning.
Jeg kommer nok til at rydde op efter dig idet de cykelstier du har lavet alligevel ikke er korrekt forbundne til resten af vejnettet.
Bortset fra det, velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
chemichael (2016-11-19 17:38:15+00:00): Der er blevet konstrueret nyt vejanlæg der bl.a indklyderer en selvstående dobbeltrettet cykelsti ved Aau-Cph. Det var integreringen af denne der blev baggrund for den ekstensive optegning.
Hjart (2016-11-19 17:49:45+00:00): Hvornår er dette nye vejanlæg lavet og hvorfra og hvortil går denne nye dobbeltrettede cykelsti? 
Efter min vurdering vil det være bedst at slette hovedparten af de cykelstier du har lavet.
Hjart (2016-11-19 17:51:46+00:00): Bemærk at de luftfotos vi her i DK PT tegner efter er fra foråret 2016.
chemichael (2016-11-19 17:55:51+00:00): Vejanlægget blev udbygget efter sommeren 2016. Det er nu færdigt.
chemichael (2016-11-19 18:04:16+00:00): Der er, for størstedelen af cykel-infrastrukturen en adskillelse mellem bil-vej og cykel-vej med kantsten, det er derfor jeg har kategoriseret dem som 'designated' fordi de er enkeltstående i sin forstand.
Hjart (2016-11-19 18:07:51+00:00): Hvori består vejanlægget? Jeg kan se nogle barrierer på dette billede fra sidst i august: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ytW5hIekZWHaC5592q_0tg
chemichael (2016-11-19 18:14:22+00:00): Det er dens linjeføring jeg har forsøgt gengivet på kortet. Men der er også fodgængerovergang der mangler at tagges for.
Hjart (2016-11-19 18:14:36+00:00): Er der blot en kantsten mellem bilvej og cykelsti tagges bilvejen normalt bare med et "cycleway=track" (sådan som de var det i forvejen).
Hjart (2016-11-19 18:17:02+00:00): Er der bare en malet stribe eller kantsten eller en smal rabat mellem bilvej og cykelsti opfatter vi dem normalt som en samlet vej.
chemichael (2016-11-19 19:06:15+00:00): Den seneste kommentar var god, det er ikke beskrevet i wiki'en så detaljeret: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstier#Cykelstier_i_Danmark
Hjart (2016-11-19 19:10:45+00:00): Super at du finder ud af det :-)
Hjart (2016-11-19 19:21:26+00:00): Som meget erfaren OSM mand er jeg en stor tilhænger af "KISS princippet": https://ing.dk/blog/kiss-princippet-135905, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle. Laver vi vores data alt for komplekse, som i dette tilfælde ved at tegne separate cykelstier, bliver de hurtigt alt for uoverskuelige og så sniger der sig nemt fejl ind, der gør vores data/kort mindre funktionelle end ønskeligt.
Hjart (2016-11-19 19:29:24+00:00): Der er selvfølgelig tilfælde hvor det kan være ønskeligt at tegne separate cykelstier, men hvor vi kan slippe af sted med at bruge cycleway=* er det som oftest at foretrække.
gpstracks (2016-11-20 21:02:44+00:00): Buongiorno.
Non le sembra strano che il nome di un insediamento contenga una cifra?
Nelle tre versioni precedenti non risulta.
Le spiacerebbe ricontrollare il changeset?

Grazie
user_5359 (2016-11-19 13:59:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 12:17:25+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
GerdP (2017-09-23 08:21:00+00:00): Hi!
You added some additional ways for cycleways in this area, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454491139
Did you notice that the major roads
 were already tagged with 
cycleway=lane ?
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366922037
BCNorwich (2016-11-24 09:32:03+00:00): Hi and welcome to the worldwide OpenStreetMap database.
Your three recently mapped POI are complete fiction so I have reverted the changesets. Everything added to the OSM database must be verifiable on the ground and the is nothing verifiable at these three positions. Please feel free to map the address on your website as this looks genuine. Regards
jc86035 (2016-11-19 15:24:16+00:00): Is this section of the road bus/taxi only?
小智智 (2016-11-20 03:52:56+00:00): The section with highway=tertiary should allows all vehicles (except tourist buses) inside, and the service roads should allow only franchised buses.
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-19 20:21:13+00:00): #pleasereview 
- Many unconnected highway objects.
- Way without tags
SomeoneElse (2016-11-19 14:24:07+00:00): Hello, GioalbaF
What is an "amenity=tourism" supposed to be?
In order to see how statues are mapped, you can use taginfo:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=statue#values
Best Regards,
Andy
GioalbaF (2016-11-19 14:30:44+00:00): This is just a viewpoint where you can see all over the town of Sant'Angelo.This is known as "the statue of St. Michael"
Best Regards
SomeoneElse (2016-11-19 14:33:24+00:00): Thanks - is it actually a statue?  If so, I'd map it as a statue (perhaps in addition to the viewpoint).

Note that the tag https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=tourism is almost never used - those 37 will be mistakes.
GioalbaF (2016-11-19 14:35:16+00:00): no it is not a statue was only named by the municipality because the place where will be built a statue
SomeoneElse (2016-11-19 14:39:12+00:00): Ah - OK.  I'd definitely delete the amenity=tourism tag though.
Also - normally things in OSM have capital letters for proper names, so perhaps "Statua di San Michele"?
Supaplex (2016-11-27 19:05:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
PT-53 (2016-11-20 13:56:42+00:00): Kommentar und Quellenangabe ?
mueschel (2016-11-20 14:18:02+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way? 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325331151
The tagging seems to be wrong.
Cheers, Jan
pyram (2016-11-19 14:23:16+00:00): Sicher, dass sich zwischen den Hausnummern 2 und 4 jetzt nicht mehr Nummer 3, sondern 112 befindet?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/317466778/history#map=19/51.33872/12.38707
Und: Was soll uns "martin" als Fehlermeldung sagen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/788239
Supaplex (2016-11-19 15:09:05+00:00): 煥民新村的範圍沒那麼大，119巷62弄那邊是另外的聚落
AkuAnakTimur (2016-11-19 14:53:44+00:00): The nonexisting street: was it confirmed through observation?
Alexjohnson95 (2016-11-19 15:06:16+00:00): Yes, me and a friend were looking to get to the Malaysian Tourism Centre via this street however it is gated off and has carparks in its place.
The only way to get to the centre was walking around the bank via the main roads as you cannot go straight through where the road in question should be.
AkuAnakTimur (2016-11-19 16:25:17+00:00): Thank you very much! Please refer here to see changes that have made: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43803890. The map in MAPS.ME would probably take longer time to update.
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-19 20:24:47+00:00): #pleasereview 
- Many unconnected highway objects.
- Maybe wrong deleted highways?
- Nodes without tags

See: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43800757
Chetan_Gowda (2016-11-24 07:11:16+00:00): Hi NANDJO, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You can learn editing by using this http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/.
d1g (2017-04-10 08:37:29+00:00): сколько лет и у кого займёт детализация https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454510071/history?
santamariense (2016-11-19 16:40:57+00:00): Saberia informar o nome da clínica?
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 16:29:44+00:00): You really will have to fix that bug which causes things to be moved to null island before the negative App Store reviews start rolling in!
GioalbaF (2016-11-21 18:34:41+00:00): Unfortunately. We have already sent the new version that corrects the errre Apple Store.
Thanks for the tip
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 18:37:56+00:00): Thanks for fixing, anyway!
GioalbaF (2016-11-21 18:48:57+00:00): Duty! we map the world!!! :)
Supaplex (2016-11-27 19:05:33+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
joost schouppe (2016-11-20 12:09:17+00:00): Pouquoi est-ce que vous avez suppimé cette maison?
Asteliks (2019-11-06 00:54:09+00:00): Dlaczego oznaczyłeś miejsce ochrony osiedla jako policję?
andrewblack (2016-11-22 06:27:06+00:00): Rochester is not in kent
Colin Smale (2016-11-22 10:20:24+00:00): For most purposes it is counted as Kent. For local government it is in Medway and outside the jurisdiction of Kent County Council, but if you stop 100 people in Rochester High Street and ask them "are we in Kent?" I expect 99 of them would say yes.... You will have a hard job to convince people that Southend is not in Essex, or that Torquay is not in Devon, or that Leicester is not in Leicestershire.
Osm1980 (2016-11-30 06:07:27+00:00): شما از چند تگ همزمان استفاده کردید که این اشتباه است
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-19 20:54:31+00:00): #pleasereview 
- Many not right-angled building
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43802576
jc86035 (2016-11-19 16:06:56+00:00): railway=tram_stop is probably a bad idea for the stop positions, causes rendering mess. Maybe better just to use railway=stop
小智智 (2016-11-20 03:54:58+00:00): I am going to put this issue to the mailing list and see what's the community concensus
jc86035 (2016-11-20 13:53:35+00:00): So I guess the consensus is to tag only the stops as railway=tram_stop and not have railway=halt/station? It seems sensible, if not for the fact that the system is fully bidirectional.
d1g (2016-11-19 20:54:41+00:00): Хамство в личных сообщения не делает вам чести.

Ваше поведение - омерзительно http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Etiquette

Все правки landuse без знаний местности будут откатываться до начала хоть каких-то обсуждений.
d1g (2016-11-27 23:16:54+00:00): Что стало с ЖБК-1? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310526623/history
dr&mx (2017-04-10 06:36:10+00:00): а что с ним стало?
dr&mx (2017-04-10 06:36:44+00:00): на чем основаны ваши предположения о незнании местности?
d1g (2017-04-10 07:37:58+00:00): Почему вы срашиваете? Вы же такой знаток всего на свете?!!

Ваши внеземные правки. OpenStreetMap это проект по описанию планеты Земля.
Omegatherion (2016-11-26 18:21:03+00:00): Bitte kein Mapping für eine Karte. Der TÜV ist nur einer von mehreren Mietern im Gebäude und schon garnicht heißt das Haus so.
dolphinling (2016-11-21 14:58:29+00:00): Hey, just letting you know this change seems to have put some strange names on a few towns. I undid the changes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43848768), which also undid the hostel that you created here.

I wasn't sure if the hostel was supposed to be there (aerial photography showed a bunch of trees and no nearby buildings that looked like a hostel to me) but if it was, sorry about that and feel free to add it back.
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-19 20:18:42+00:00): #pleasereview 
- Many unconnected highway objects.
- not right-angled building
aceman444 (2023-06-20 11:56:03+00:00): Zdravim, aky je zdroj takehoto nazvu chodnika?
Alexander-II (2017-01-18 03:03:20+00:00): Акведук уже есть на карте Стамбула и отмечен как линия. Откатываю этот пакет.
literan (2016-11-20 12:51:34+00:00): привет! обрати внимание на правку http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=43821179 - правильные теги для арок. covered=yes вообще не стоит использовать, он для другого
Bob (2016-11-20 12:15:03+00:00): Wurde die Haltestelle an der Gießereistraße wieder abgebaut? Das wäre sehr verwunderlich, denn vor kurzem war sie noch da.
kakoon85 (2016-11-20 18:19:13+00:00): Hallo Bob,
also ich fahre die Strecke eigentlich relativ regelmäßig, ich würde mir auch eigentlich einbilden alle Haltestellen bis zur meiner Ausstiegshaltestelle (Geisweid) zu kennen. Diese Haltestelle ist mir zuletzt nicht mehr aufgefallen. Außerdem ist sie nicht in der Haltestellen-Datenbank auf der VWS-Homepage enthalten und auf dem Streckenplan der R10  steht die Haltestelle ebenso nicht mehr drauf. Ich werde in der nächsten Zeit nochmal genauer darauf achten und sie ggf. wieder aufnehmen, bin mir aber eigentlich sicher, dass es sie nicht mehr gibt...
Grüße
kakoon85
SK53 (2017-02-01 20:19:16+00:00): Please dont map individual occurences of Epipactis palustris. This is not appropriate information for OSM. Additionally this uses a tagging scheme which does not follow the well-established conventional tags for plants in OSM and natural=wetland is incorrect also. Plant distributions are much better recorded using the pre-existing databases (FloraWeb for instance in Germany).
user_5359 (2016-11-20 09:22:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: Closed shops are marked with disused.
Carnildo (2016-11-19 20:05:59+00:00): The "name" field should only be used for the name of the object, and nothing else -- computers don't understand that a suffix of "(Closed)" means that a gas station is closed, and so it will still show up in searches.

The customary way to indicate that a business has been closed is to stick the "disused:" prefix on the tags that no longer apply.  For example, this gas station would be "disued:amenity=fuel", "disused:fuel:diesel=yes", and if the name has been removed from the signs, "disused:name=Conoco".
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-19 20:40:16+00:00): #pleasereview 
- Wrong mapped ways
- Maybe wrong deleted ways?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43806547
amarrington (2016-11-19 21:00:13+00:00): Are you using correct imagery provided by the hotosm taking manager description? Everything I changed is correct and up to date.
amarrington (2016-11-19 21:01:21+00:00): #usecorrectimageryandsquarebuildings
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-19 21:36:05+00:00): Thank you very much for your overall positive feedback. I mapped the missing tracks, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447729706#map=19/-1.08747/34.51865 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447714388#map=19/-1.08949/34.51344 #HappyMapping
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-19 20:36:23+00:00): #pleasereview 
- Many deleted ways
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43806942
user_5359 (2016-11-20 09:25:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

The key traffic ist used to notice the amount of traffic (low, high) or speed of traffic (slow, fast).
Andreeeee (2016-11-21 17:11:32+00:00): Zrusme tam aspon "access=private", hm? Miesto toho tam mozme dat motor_vehicle=forestry...
Mirecnet (2016-11-21 23:15:12+00:00): Mozes to tam pridat,. Ale preco chces zrusit  "access=private" ? Jedna sa o sukromnu cestu Meskych lesov. Vjazd na ne vyzaduje zvlasnu povolenku.
Andreeeee (2016-11-22 06:26:36+00:00): Primarny dovod je ze sa to blbo renderuje (nejaka tenucka ruzova ciara ktoru ani nevidno)...

Inak nechcem moc zachadzat do pravniciny, Slovenske lesy ale su vacsinou verejne pristupne, aj ked oficialne "patria" nejakemu podniku. Mozno access=permissive by siel, ale podla mna staci zakaz motorovym vyzidlam... 

Podla popisu access=private je skor pre prijazdove cesty k sukromnym objektom. Keby sme to brali tak striktne, museli by sme oznacit vsetky polne a lesne cesty, a lesy ako private... :)
Mirecnet (2016-11-23 14:46:48+00:00): Zbytocne to riesis. Su to sukromne cesty Mestkych lesov. Tak to mam aj na povolenke pre vjazd. To, ze su to tenke ciarky na OSM ? Zapnui si Freemap.sk. Tam su to vsade chodniky, cyklo chodniky...
Andreeeee (2016-11-23 17:53:15+00:00): Dal som si tu pracu. Ziadna sukromna cesta to nie je:

https://kataster.skgeodesy.sk/Portal/sk/Detail/ParcelE/1369443785

https://kataster.skgeodesy.sk/Portal/sk/Detail/ParcelC/1412448052?map=true

je tam zakaz vjazdu motorovych vozidiel, to je vsetko. Takych zakazov je vo vsetkych horach plno... Takze ak nenajdes lepsi argument, zmenim to.
Mirecnet (2016-11-23 21:21:27+00:00): Tak cumim, aku si si dal robotu. Vyrazil si mi dych :) Je to nepriestrelny argument...zmen tu cestu na Malino. Som rad, ze si sa na to pozrel a dal si si tu robotu skor, ako si nieco zmenil.
Mirecnet (2016-11-23 21:44:04+00:00): Len nechapem na akom zaklade to mesto RK prehlasilo za svoju lesnu zvaznicu a vybera poplatky za vjazd. Nemoze to mat v najme suktomna firma Mestke lesy a je to teda aj tak sukromna cesta ? Zislo by sa napisat na Meske lesy a na Mestky urad Ruzomberok. Napises ?
Mirecnet (2016-11-24 05:18:21+00:00): Dokument vlastnictva
https://kataster.skgeodesy.sk/EsknBo/Bo.svc/GeneratePrf?prfNumber=7085&cadastralUnitCode=853801&outputType=pdf
Vlastnik: Slovenska republika
Spravca: Lesy Slovenskej republiky,š.p., 
Najomca: Mesto Ružomberok,
Andreeeee (2016-11-26 07:54:28+00:00): Fuha, to sa nejak komplikuje :) Povedal by som ze tam nie je ziadna znacka "zakaz vstupu", ani "sukromny pozemok", takze by som ostal tak ako to je (zmenil som to nez som nasiel notifikaciu v emaili dnes...). Ale keby o to slo, ani jedna z organizacii hore nie je sukromna firma...

Mozno by sa tato diskusia mala presunut na nejake OSM forum, hadam ze nie sme jedini s takym problemom...
Mirecnet (2016-11-27 23:10:43+00:00): Napisal som...cakam na odpoved.
Mirecnet (2016-11-28 19:38:04+00:00): Ahoj, odpovede (ludia co kreslia OSM) nejdes v tomto Freemap fore uplne dole: https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!msg/osm_sk/U7uNkxu3hQU/3EVxMOLoBgAJ.
Andreeeee (2016-11-29 18:51:13+00:00): Dik ze si sa toho ujal! Tak to vyzera ze je to teda v zasade ok tak ako je to teraz? Cesta na malino IMO nemusi byt track, vsak sa to asi primarne pouziva na dopravu do strediska? Ale z mojej strany je hlavne ze ten access neni private, prinajhorsom aj ten track prekusnem .-) A mozno napisem na OSM, nech zmenia rendering nech sa to trochu viac normalnej ceste podoba, nez blatenej polnacke (ked je to grade1) :)
rab (2016-11-19 19:03:06+00:00): Hi,
I just compared the Mapbox background image to standard bing. It appeares that it is exactly the same image, with a different processing, plus a significant offset. Could you confirm this? (same cars at the same position)
regards
Ralf
keithonearth (2016-11-19 19:21:59+00:00): oops. I forgot to update the source field in JOSM, this was done with BC Mosaic imagery.
keithonearth (2016-11-19 19:22:12+00:00): Oops. I forgot to update the source field in JOSM, this was done with BC Mosaic imagery.
XxROBOTICSxX (2016-11-19 20:16:29+00:00): I am a local who drives these roads everyday, that is why I felt it necessary to ensure these roads are up to date and accurate.
Wynndale (2016-12-11 18:11:59+00:00): Where do the names for landuse polygons come from and are you happy the names apply to the boundaries of the polygons?
ccityplanner12 (2017-06-16 18:18:42+00:00): Local knowledge as I lived around there.
XxROBOTICSxX (2016-11-19 20:17:12+00:00): I am a local who drives these roads everyday, that is why I felt it necessary to ensure these roads are up to date and accurate.