piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
syntex (2020-12-01 07:12:49+00:00): But the village of Dadivank won't be in the Nagorno-Karabakh. The soviet border of the NKAO will be applied there, which I have drawn correctly. And Azerbaijan is already there.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-01 07:21:40+00:00): I know. but my understanding was that due to the proximity of the village to NKAO borders, it was supposed to remain under Russian Peacekeeper forces.

As per Russian MOD, the village itself and the church are under Russian peacekeepers. The Church yard itself is already labelled in OSMas under Russian Forces.

The village is specifically marked on this Map, and is within Peacekeeper borders
http://eng.mil.ru/en/russian_peacekeeping_forces/infographics.htm
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-01 07:28:46+00:00): Wait, do we have confirmation about Azerbaijains being in the village? or simply along the highway?

I saw video of Azerbaijanis in the village of Baglipaya. so that particular change is confirmed.
syntex (2020-12-01 07:31:52+00:00): Yes we have. Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NordR65hxZI
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-01 07:35:25+00:00): ok thank you. I also just found an Armenian source confirming the handover, and talking about "church officials having contact with Russians on the other side of the line, etc etc)

Do you mind redrawing the border here?

And another question that's to explore, is it only the monastery that's under Russian protection? or the entire village?
syntex (2020-12-01 07:42:42+00:00): The village is empty. The only Armenians remain in the church.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-03 15:52:03+00:00): What do you make of this particular twitter thread?

https://twitter.com/301_AD/status/1334518166798610434?s=20
syntex (2020-12-03 17:19:59+00:00): He told (the Armenian in the video), that around the monastery Azerbaijani soldiers are present, so i think that leaving the monastery territory as a military area on the map is enough. There must have been an agreemnet between Putin and Alijew about the presence of Russian soldiers there. But legally the status for now is clear - this is Azerbaijani teritorry, there will be no Armenian exclave, they can visit that place only because of the russian forces that stay there.
aweech (2020-12-01 15:24:38+00:00): Hi,
I reviewed this edit, and I am just commenting to clear up the confusion about relations. When you added the subdivision to the Wellsville relation with the role `inner`, that's saying that the subdivision is _not_ part of Wellsville. So the correct thing to do is to not have the subdivision in the Wellsville relation at all. Data consumers can tell that it is part of Wellsville because it is within the geographic bounds of the city. By analogy, you can look at the boundary line for Wellsville itself. It's not an `inner` member of the Cache County relation, and data consumers can tell that Wellsville is in Cache County from the coordinates of the nodes. I went ahead and fixed the mistake.

Thank you for your contributions!
mateov (2020-12-02 18:24:55+00:00): According to Michigan legislation this naming only pertains to the part of M-5 "extending from the interchange of highways I-96, I-275, and I-696 east to the intersection with M-102." http://legislature.mi.gov/doc.aspx?mcl-250-1054
Can you please change to reflect this?
BigKev97 (2023-07-09 16:50:13+00:00): Now it says "Haggerty Connector".
sabre23ts (2020-12-01 16:01:00+00:00): Nice update using Andro Vespucci editor. ;-)
kucai (2020-12-02 01:32:47+00:00): bikin tension jugak pakai vespucci ni, tapi the best available yet. Bila banyak nak repair (tengok nama jalan dalam kawasan kilang), kerja2 potong n cantum jalan mmg menduga iman.
osmviborg (2020-12-01 05:46:10+00:00): Steder hvor et hvert spor af banen er fjernet er det ikke normalt at tegne strækningen.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground
user_5359 (2020-12-02 15:27:24+00:00): Hello! There is no necessary for writing a language code after phone:mnemonic. Because you have only number and the big ASCII letter (you can't type 1-877-XINH-ĐẸP you type always 1-877-XINH-DEP)
Minh Nguyen (2020-12-02 16:52:18+00:00): The store posts signs with both spellings (also on their website). I realize it’s unusual; however, mnemonics may or may not be typeable anyways. (It isn’t uncommon for a pnemonic to be too long for a phone number, for instance.)
osmviborg (2020-12-01 05:38:52+00:00): runway som område er ikke dagens standart. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Drunway
mueschel (2020-12-05 14:45:14+00:00): Hi,
what does 'petroglyphs = yes' mean? This tag is not used in any other place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879504682
Allison P (2021-07-20 18:54:16+00:00): These roads were demolished years ago, and I removed them previously, but you seem to have added them back.
abvincen (2021-07-21 10:59:30+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the wrong addition of roads, I've missed to check the latest aerial imagery. I'll ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
abvincen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95076609
mavl (2020-12-01 15:44:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это пакет правок меняет номер дома на "134К1". Такое обозначение не соответствует соглашению, которое действует в России. Рекомендуется указывать "134 к1".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
Frans S (2020-12-01 11:39:28+00:00): Hi.
A remark.
Please do not map small residential areas between roads. They ought to consist out of a district, villages or complete towns.
about highways,  Local highways in towns needs to be tagged as residential.
Unclassified is for outside town and rural areas. Please read the wiki about that |
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Also applicable here.
Best regards
Frans S (2020-12-01 11:27:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
I reviewed your work and am sorry to say that your work is inaccurate. You collect multiple buildings and tagged them as 1 building.  Sometimes rather inaccurate.
See my PM to you how to improve your mappings
Best regards
user_5359 (2020-12-02 15:44:32+00:00): Hello! Why did you use website:local instead of simple website?
CoyKoi (2020-12-01 21:57:11+00:00): Hi Elfoniok thanks for the edits, it's very useful to have these paths on the map!

Just a note that it seems you accidentally dragged a an address node (53B Gulf View Road) across the road to a different location. No drama - this is an easy mistake to make, and I've reverted it already.

When you submit your changes and are writing the changeset comment, you can have a look at the list of changes at the bottom of the panel, to double check that your changes were all intended.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95077861
Elfoniok (2020-12-02 07:12:31+00:00): Thanks, honestly I actually saw the change set and I noticed that something is not right and that I probably drag something accidentally. That is why I asked for review because I didn't know what I have done and how to fix it. For example one change was "residential area modified" but I didn't know what kind of modification that was or how to fix it? Is there any documentation about that?
CoyKoi (2020-12-02 09:06:21+00:00): OK cool, thanks for flagging for review.
If I look at the changeset in OSMCha (follow the link in my first comment) I can see that you added an extra node on the boundary of the residential area - an insignificant change. This is the node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8181757139

Another tip is to use the "Highlight changes" feature in the editor (Map Data -> Style Options -> Highlight Changes) to see where you have made edits.

I agree though that sometimes it is difficult or impossible to know exactly what was changed, before submitting. Then once published, in OSMCha you can see full details
user_8722718 (2020-12-01 16:47:19+00:00): thanks
ralley (2020-12-01 06:49:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits but this changeset has multiple issues:  You have removed the building tag and added an area tag to a building which is not how buildings are tagged in OSM; you have used a long hand description tag instead of amenity=doctors; you have dragged an address node onto the road way; phone numbers should use ITU-T E.164 format (use a leading +64, drop the leading 0); Saint should be expanded rather than abbreviated St.  Please see the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ for guidance on OSM mapping.  Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95079081
Prusaker (2020-12-01 06:56:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584756340/history
В д.Костевичи сделали нормальный автомобильный мост? Там пешеходный мост, хотя на спутниковых снимках кажется, что это  дорога для автомобилей.
olo81 (2024-03-17 15:47:55+00:00): Poprzednia nazwa była poprawna. Zestaw zmian wycofany.
AnkushB (2020-12-01 06:10:11+00:00): Ugh, unable to remove hashtags. THis was accidental
Taksine (2024-09-11 14:40:24+00:00): 你应该把中文写上name的，这里是中国，name只能写中文，不能写英文（name只有英文没中文的除外）
DaxServer (2021-01-22 13:35:41+00:00): Hi. I would say this is an unclassified highway and not a residential highway. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95080564
CurlingMan13 (2022-12-29 18:14:59+00:00): These buildings are not all 12 meters tall, and they aren't traced very well.
mavl (2020-12-01 15:47:32+00:00): Hello. This changeset corrects nothing. What do you want to correct?
Piskvor (2020-12-02 09:04:05+00:00): Opět přetagováno z reálného stavu, proč? Revert.
marwit79 (2021-05-12 14:56:22+00:00): Hallo,
ist bei der Aktualisierung von Bushaltestelle 2638083720 etwas mit den Koordinaten passiert? Diese liegt jetzt direkt auf der Schiene, lag vorher direkt am "Großen Sandweg". Dies scheint nicht richtig zu sein ... bitte prüfen.
Gruß marwit
Tomasz Herud (2020-12-01 19:11:57+00:00): Hej, czemu temu CPR nadałeś nazwę? Raczej czegoś takiego się nie praktykuje poza sytuacjami kiedy dawna ulica z nazwą staje się CPR.
Omega933 (2020-12-01 19:14:09+00:00): Dzięki za informację, usunę zatem nazwę.
mavl (2020-12-02 03:17:23+00:00): Hello. This changeset fixes nothing. What do you want to fix?
user_2066394 (2020-12-01 10:25:02+00:00): Speziell bei der Kindertagesstätte hätte man die bereits eingezeichneten Gebäude auch einfach miteinander verbinden können.

In dem Zusammenhang ggf. auch interessant:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part
Cartographer10 (2020-12-01 11:57:43+00:00): Bedankt voor de snelle correctie. Je hoeft dat kleine stukje niet als highway=footway te tekenen. Je kunt gewoon de highway=path doortrekken tot aan de weg. Ook heb je de toegangsrechten (access=no en foot=yes) niet op die kleine stukjes gezet.
Carto'Cité (2021-01-08 09:42:32+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette contribution.

Est-ce que Val Parisis Emploi est une agence Pôle Emploi, ou un service fourni par la collectivité type "Maison de l'emploi" ? Cela peut permettre d'affiner les tags :-)

Je me demande également si ce node est placé précisément : ce service se trouve-t-il dans le local de la Maison de services au public de la gare (pièce indoor voisine), ou dans le local situé entre les toilettes et la boutique Relay ?

Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoTransilien
-ckb- (2021-01-22 13:51:49+00:00): Hallo willisturm,

betreffend dieses changeset muss ich dich zu Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669493565) etwas fragen: Ich wohne in der Nähe und habe das Gebäude "grob" mit GPS eingemessen, und eben mit "notes"  bzw. "fixme" versehen. Die tatsächlichen Gebäudeumrisse waren bestimmt zu 95% in Ordnung. Nun aber sehe ich dass du die Konturen von basemap nachgezeichnet hast. Das enstpricht definitiv nicht der Realität. Beim bing-Luftbild sieht man auch schon die Baugrube.

lg
-ckb-
vasony (2020-12-05 16:45:52+00:00): Kedves Kabóca!

Sikerült letörölni jó pár utca highway=track cimkéjét, ezekkel megszűntek mind utcák. Mi volt módosítás célja?
Ha ezek burkolatlan lakóutak, akkor highway=residential szükséges helyette a surface= érték mellett.

Tamás
Kabóca (2020-12-05 17:11:09+00:00): Kedves Tamás!
Nem tudom, hogy ezt hogy sikerült, sajnálom. Alapvetően surface, maxspeed és oneway adatokat töltök. 
Megnézem, amit tudok, javítom.
Kabóca
Kabóca (2020-12-05 17:37:02+00:00): ...módosítottam a Katalin út, az Ágnes utca és a Boglárka út egy szakaszát: highway=residential.
Visszanéztem, az adatok módosultak, de a térképen nem jelenik meg. Itt megállt a tudományom - van esetleg tipped, mi lehet a probléma?
Köszönöm
Kabóca
vasony (2020-12-05 19:17:15+00:00): Nekem jónak tűnik, még nem frissült biztos.
a többit visszaállítottam és átírtam amelyiknek volt neve.
Kabóca (2020-12-05 20:38:34+00:00): Köszönöm! Tényleg fogalmam sincs, ez hogy sikerült :) A többi szerkesztésemnél - úgy látom - nem történt ilyen.
!bm (2020-12-01 12:56:21+00:00): Hallo PTR-Berlin,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

Sieht soweit korrekt aus – evt waren die veränderten Kacheln (tiles) noch nicht neu geladen. Zudem wird es bei osm-carto (Hauptkarte openstreetmap.org) blaßblau gerendert, da access=private. 

Davon abgesehen soll man ja auch gar nicht für den Renderer taggen – siehe OSM-Grundlagen, zB https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

--besteGrüße!bm
p*b (2020-12-01 17:54:26+00:00): Hallo und danke für deine Antwort.
Ich wollte auch gar nichts taggen, hatte mich nur gewundert, dass im Editor die Zuordnung "parking" ein kleines dunkelgraues Auto-Icon hervorgerufen hat und kein P. 
Anscheinend dauert es immer ein Weilchen, bis neue Einträge oder Änderungen vollständig übernommen und angezeigt werden... Inzwischen sieht es auch so aus, wie ich es entsprechend der anderen Parkplätze in den KGA haben wollte. 
Ich will ja selbst nichts verpfuschen. 🙂
Gruß und schönen Abend noch!
aceman444 (2020-12-20 00:23:46+00:00): Please stop with these random changes. How can there be a park in the middle of a roads junction?
surveyor54 (2020-12-01 09:05:09+00:00): CS-Ergänzung: Name entfernt.
Sanniu (2020-12-02 08:57:36+00:00): The https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879593276 have no tags. Can you, please, add appropriate tags?
A67-A67 (2020-12-02 22:24:46+00:00): Je hebt hier alleen fietsstroken toegevoegd aan de weg. Aan het commentaar te lezen, zijn de fietspaden ook niet meer aanwezig. Dat is echter niet aangepast met deze wijziging.
Gys de Jongh (2020-12-03 00:55:12+00:00): Dat klopt A67
Bij de Berlicumseweg staat een infobord met de mededeling dat deze weg "gerationaliseerd" wordt in opdracht van St Michielsgestel en dat het in Oktober 2020 klaar is. Het fietspad aan de N kant is helemaal weg. Het fietspad aan de Z kant is slechts hier en daar weg en ik zie er geen systeem in. Er liggen stukken asfalt langs de weg en er staan nog waarschuwingszuilen. Ik wacht even met het weghalen van de fietspaden tot alles echt klaar is.
Gys
A67-A67 (2020-12-03 14:20:34+00:00): Dat klinkt logisch. Ik heb de routes naar de rijbaan verlegd, zodat het weghalen van de fietspaden gemakkelijker wordt.
Gys de Jongh (2020-12-03 15:09:25+00:00): Thx A67
Ik fiets er regelmatig langs. Als het stof is neergedaald zal ik de fietspaden ook op Osm verwijderen. Het wegdek is (was) heel erg slecht door de vele boomwortels. Fiets je er zelf wel eens langs trouwens ?
Lee Carré (2021-11-30 16:46:17+00:00): Why delete & re-add, with no significant changes (to geometry or tagging), instead of simply modifying the existing outline?
OffTheChart (2021-12-06 11:07:57+00:00): I vaguely remember (FFS this was some time ago) having problems editing this one.
It's correct now, so why are you wasting our time worrying about it?
Lee Carré (2021-12-06 17:45:22+00:00): “why are you wasting our time worrying about it?”

Not worrying, or wasting time (attempting to understand why, rather than assuming). However:
▪︎http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
▪︎“having problems editing this one” sounds like you found a bug in Potlatch which would've been better reported & fixed rather than worked-around with data-mangling.
Lee Carré (2021-12-06 18:00:42+00:00): Besides, since I prefer surveying, the weather isn't all that inviting lately for doing such (without unreasonable hindrance).

It's not like I'm trawling through all historic changesets; just happening upon ones which are relevant to what I was checking at the time. I think I discovered this set during my efforts re http://www.osm.org/note/2657861
Lee Carré (2022-03-13 19:09:26+00:00): http://www.merchantsquare.je/
Lee Carré (2022-03-13 19:50:42+00:00): http://www.lemasurier.co.uk/news/proud-present-merchants-square-new-development-centre-st-helier/
Lee Carré (2022-03-13 20:04:38+00:00): http://www.camerons.je/projects/current/all/project/bath-street-re-development
Lee Carré (2022-03-13 20:09:23+00:00): http://www.camerons.je/news/article/bath-street-re-development
Sanniu (2020-12-02 13:49:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/879594974 has no tags. Can you, please, add appropriate tags?
user_5359 (2022-01-16 08:25:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
pza (2020-12-09 08:40:31+00:00): I wonder if natural=wood or natural=scrub is more appropriate for this?  There is no grass, it's not recreational, not maintained as a park, etc.
su ch (2020-12-09 11:15:47+00:00): thanks pza, I have amended to natural=scrub
Patchanka (2021-03-29 16:55:45+00:00): bonjour
je crois qu'il y a un chiffre en trop dans le n° de téléphone que vous avez indiqué. Pouvez-vous regarder ça ?
merci d'avance
LucieALO (2021-03-30 07:20:32+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci, c'est corrigé. 
Bonne journée
VA00 (2020-12-19 17:56:28+00:00): Betonowe płyty dziurkowane, rów, bariery, ale nie grassland.
eggie (2020-12-01 10:38:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


review.. 
Zoals je zie heb je nogal wat schade veroorzaakt aan de kaart.
Waarschijnlijk soor schuiven met de kaart in editmodus
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95087787
Kijk hier hoe je een school toevoegt in OSM
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool

MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-12-01 10:42:45+00:00): reverted by changeset #95090219
Je edits zijn teruggedraaid. Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2020-12-01 10:49:18+00:00): Deze afdeling stond al vermeld op deze plaats.. alleen name= bevatte het adres ipv de afdelingsnaam. 
....aangepast
mavl (2020-12-02 03:13:04+00:00): Hello. This changeset corrects nothing. What do you want to correct?
R0bst3r (2020-12-09 14:21:11+00:00): Hallo 2-B,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95087993
PT-53 (2020-12-01 12:34:28+00:00): Hallo H-GT,
warum hast Du das Merkmal
lcn=yes
an diesem Wegabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25013914/history#map=19/48.22559/9.54894
gelöscht?
Das gleiche an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205700485/history

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-12-13 10:28:00+00:00): Keine Antwort / Reaktion. Schade
Merkmal lcn=yes wieder eingetragen.
Nakaner (2020-12-01 12:20:19+00:00): Hallo,

könntest du bitte aufhören, systematisch bei allerlei Blaulicht-Objekten addr:country=* und andere offensichtliche Tags zu ergänzen? Das Land ergibt sich aus der Verwaltungsgrenze von Deutschland.

Viele Grüße

Michael
MitjaJez (2021-12-20 21:51:18+00:00): This relation should be deleted since it's historical element that does not exist any more. We must follow On the Ground Rule! So it's OK to map ruins of railway but not what does not exist any more.
Use openhistoricalmap.org for this.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule
bxl-forever (2020-12-01 18:14:45+00:00): "Chemin des Serres": I couldn’t find a data source with it, and couldn’t find a Dutch translation either.  I gather you live not far from there, maybe there is a sign somewhere.
Thierry1030 (2020-12-01 19:16:27+00:00): I based myself on this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2446924
but I will check one of these days ... I live close to Josaphatpark ...
mavl (2020-12-01 15:48:47+00:00): Hello. This changeset corrects nothing. What do you want to correct?
jpennycook (2020-12-01 17:40:06+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for fixing the bicycle access on that section of bridleway - I have no idea why I set it to "no" in the first place.

Jon
mueschel (2020-12-04 12:17:27+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "width:lane"? Dieses Tag gibt es nicht.
Meinst du cycleway:width ?

Gruß
Jan
user_70413 (2020-12-05 08:17:36+00:00): Hallo, schön dass du den Fehler entdeckt hast und ja, das meinte ich. An diesem Radweg auf der Straße wollte ich eigentlich auch nichts ändern, er machte jedoch Probleme beim Hochladen und dann habe ich kurzerhand die bisherigen (falschen) tags in nochmals falsche tags abgewandelt. Sorry
b*k*
tux67 (2020-12-01 14:03:28+00:00): Wenn nicht das ganze Gebäude NUR für den Laden ist, würde ich vorschlagen den Laden auf einen separaten Node im Gebäude zu Mappen und nur die Adressdaten am Gebäude zu belassen. Öffnungszeiten Hinweis siehe Kommentar DHL Shop.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95089721
AirforceOne (2020-12-01 14:48:15+00:00): The whole building is a rural shop, providing breakfast, food, beverages and much more.
Additionally, they offer DHL parcel services.
tux67 (2020-12-01 14:50:13+00:00): ok, thanks for the feedback and the changes
tux67 (2020-12-01 14:00:24+00:00): Hi, Opening Hours müssen bei OSM in englisch sein:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de

hier hilft:
https://openingh.ypid.de/evaluation_tool/
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95089871
AirforceOne (2020-12-01 14:44:58+00:00): I appreciate the hint and the provided links.
Opening hours corrected to English.
Patchanka (2026-05-14 17:56:28+00:00): bonjour @LucieALO

j'ai l'impression qu'il y a un gros couac sur l'emplacement de cette ferme. Leur site indique "350 Chemin du Hiton à Pey" et ici c'est 382 Chemin du Hagna à Bénesse-Maremne !

Le commentaire de changeset lui, indique "Benesse les Dax" !

J'ai l'impression que tout s'était un peu mélangé, non ? 

Je pense qu'elle est vers là : https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=43.620473&mlon=-1.1927411#map=12/43.6711/-1.2188
Patchanka (2026-05-14 17:57:48+00:00): mince voilà le bon lien : https://osm.org/go/b~4IafgB-?m=
LMJpro-PALO (2026-05-26 07:53:00+00:00): Bonjour Patchanka, Effectivement! L'exploitant a déménagé à Pey il y a déjà 3ans. Merci. J'ai fait les modifs. Ils font toujours de la vente à la ferme mais le lieu de vente n'est pas connu, j'irai voir .
Patchanka (2026-06-11 17:54:04+00:00): cool, merci <3
InfosReseaux (2021-02-14 21:11:09+00:00): Bonsoir Cantece,

Bravo pour cet énorme travail dans la zone, les descriptions sont super complètes et c'est impressionnant.
Nous travaillons en ce moment sur les poteaux électriques et il y en a un certains nombre d'identifiés autour de Thoméry. Serait-ce possible d'y ajouter le tag operator=Enedis s'il vous plait ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France#R.C3.A9seaux_de_distribution

Ils pourrons ainsi être pris en compte sur cette plateforme : https://enedis.openstreetmap.fr

Bonne soirée
François
Frans S (2020-12-01 11:10:31+00:00): Hi John.
A request. 
Please try to avoid connecting nodes of buildings to each other. Keep the Ctr key down when you map close to another building
Best regards