piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DD1GJ (2017-11-11 08:24:12+00:00): Hallo, Du hast bei deinen gestrigen Änderungen jede Menge Adressknoten ersatzlos gelöscht und  damit wichtige Informationen zerstört. Ebenso hast Du Stolpersteine gelöscht. Da der Anteil viellecht richtiger Änderungen zu gering ist, werde ich Deine Lösch-Änderungssätze komplett zurücksetzen.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Stolpersteine
Nakaner (2017-11-12 11:28:52+00:00): @DD1GJ Ich habe mit OSMCha noch einen weiteren derartigen Änderungssatz gefunden und revertiert sowie weitere fragliche Änderungssätze gefunden und kommentiert. http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2578895
aceman444 (2020-11-28 16:39:49+00:00): Zdravim, ten nazov "Malé Krasňany BD5" na budove bol spravne, je to nazov budovy. addr:housename sa pouziva inak, na adresach v ramci budovy, ak si napr. tie prevadzky uvadzaju nazov budovy v adrese, a to je zriedkavo.
Russ McD (2018-10-23 02:24:27+00:00): Way 539731274 is a good example of the poor tagging by a member of the Facebook team:  
At the south end, arguably this is a gravel surface, then it deteriorates, until almost disappearing across fields in the mid -section. Later imagery shows it has now been ploughed over, and a detour MIGHT just get you through, but not in a car.
This is our Facebook legacy - roads like this all over Thailand that have not been revised, and navigation software will gladly send you down this in a car, only to end up in a muddy field.
This is an agricultural area and while the beginnings of the roads might look OK, please take the time to correctly show the mid-sections as tracks, hopefully averting real life navigational errors.
The changeset is described as "changed classification for consistency" ... hell, does that mean all tracks in this area have been changed to roads "for consistency" !!!
eggie (2017-11-11 20:06:17+00:00): perfect edit at the addressnode!
user_5359 (2017-11-11 11:49:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:11:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:11:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Nakaner (2017-11-14 09:53:51+00:00): Hi Salaamlogari,

you asked for a review, here it is.

You have created a very large building in this changeset which does not look like a building on satellite imagery. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539741011/history If it is a military camp, please use landuse=military instead. If the airport is not only used by military forces, copy the tags of the airport node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1042050735/history) and delete the airport instead (i.e. replace the node by a polygon).

The airport/camp polygon also has the tag office=political_party which seems to be wrong, too.

You used highway=living_street in this changeset but this seems to be wrong here. This tag is used for small streets in residential areas where cars only drive at walk speed or a little above. The roads on the airport are wider. Please use highway=residential for the major ones inside the facility and highway=service + service=alley for the minor ones.

One of your roads crosses a wall (it looks like a wall on the imagery). It's near https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5222329651#map=19/33.95180/69.05084. Could you please draw the road around the wall?

The following is not an issue caused by you but you could fix it while you are already editing in this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79398373 runs straight over the airport and seems to be a left-over of an old, bad import of bad data. Just delete it. It seems to be more a riverbed than a road.

Best regards

Michael
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:11:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Jay May (2017-11-14 19:20:28+00:00): Please rollback how this border checkpoint used to look.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:11:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:11:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:12:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
user_5359 (2017-11-11 08:49:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A lake doesn’t have an address. For location information you can use the key is_in (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in)
BaboucheVerte (2023-01-02 08:57:41+00:00):  5 years later ... corrected your fixme ! 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130777487
user_5359 (2017-11-11 08:44:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please write the street name to addr:street instead.
tonyf1 (2017-11-11 00:10:21+00:00): Hi. This looks like a duplicate of Node: Cabañas Rivendel (662450105)  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/662450105
tonyf1 (2017-11-16 01:50:18+00:00): No reply. Transferred wifi information to the older node. Deleted as duplicate in Changeset #53826178
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:12:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
Nakaner (2017-11-14 09:53:33+00:00): Hi Salaamlogari,

OpenStreetMap is not your personal drawing program (or Microsoft Paint). Please don't make draw funny things. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539746561 looks like a doodle.

Could you please delete it and draw the other runways properly?

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2017-11-14 09:58:51+00:00): Hi Salaamlogari,

I just forgot to mention that OpenStreetMap is a database project, no drawing project. We map features which exist on the ground. So please keep to the reality and don't edit the data just in order that something appears one the map as you want it to be rendered. That's why we do not map for the renderer. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Here is an example of such abusive mapping for the renderer: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53679588#map=18/33.91771/69.07546

Best regards

Michael
Salaamlogari (2017-11-14 15:34:34+00:00): yes ok
user_5359 (2017-11-11 11:42:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of the tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian ! Did you mean highway=footway ?
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:12:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-11-25 13:55:14+00:00): Não se deve colar áreas em vias como voce fez aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539130916
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:12:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
user_5359 (2017-11-11 08:41:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space! I believe you mean amenity=parking  .
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:12:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:12:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:56:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:12:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
user_5359 (2017-11-11 07:18:11+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Zur Kennzeichnung eines Gebäude verwende bitte building=yes anstatt area=yes.

Wenn Du Hilfe zur Korrekture brauchst, melde Dich bitte.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-11-11 07:53:48+00:00): Ergänzung: bei den "Zufahrtsstraße" fehlen die genauen Bezeichnungen (highway= und access=)
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:26:36+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/53680153
mavl (2018-12-25 20:01:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_6110846 (2018-03-15 07:04:35+00:00): Good Day 

Novoselytsia (from Relations )  is country Ukraine 

Please do not rename the Ukrainian country to Russia.

For Ukrainians, this is an insult
wambacher (2018-03-15 12:14:32+00:00): hi, i'm not shure what you are talking about.

i did not rename any relation (boundary) to exist in russia and don't want to do that. 

what i did: i'm fixing missing borders or borders with TECHNICAL errors, just by repairing them.

during that dayly task (see https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/projekte/internationale-administrative-grenzen/missing-boundaries) some mappers including me are fixing borders round the world. 

Usually i'm creating changesets on a country base ("fixing boundaries in china", "fixing boundaries in papua new guinea", "fixing boundaries in russia", "fixing boundaries in the ukraine", ...)

!! Sometimes i forget to close the old changeset when i switch to the next country !!

I think, this must have happened here, sorry for that :( 

walter/germany
mavl (2018-12-25 20:43:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:37:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:07:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:10:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:50:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:53:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:07:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:15:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
aceman444 (2022-01-15 23:16:38+00:00): Zdravim, zda sa, ze ulica Mlyny, ktorej nazov na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25300302 ste odmazali naozaj existuje podla viacerych zdrojov samotneho mesta. Dam to radsej naspat. Neuvadzate zial ziadny zdroj zmien, Bing a ESRI na nazvy to asi nebudu.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:32:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:25:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
GOwin (2017-11-12 00:16:12+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your edits, and welcome to OSM.

Kindly follow the service_times syntax as documented on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times

If you're so inclined, please join the local community exchange at fb.com/OSMph/community
KKS (2017-11-13 22:29:39+00:00): Привіт, якась херня на з'їзді з Італійського бульвару наліво на Середньофонтанську. По супутникам такого накату навіть немає, і подвійна суцільна. Та й по твоєму "радіусу" повороту якась хальура. 

Про оце мова - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539759756
Thunder08 (2017-11-16 22:53:50+00:00): По супутнику не видно, але там навіть тролейбусні проводи натягнуті і є працюючий маршрут тролейбусу, що використовує даний напрямок.

Знаків, що забороняють проїзд у даному напрямку я не бачив, а по Середнефонтанській у цьому місті не подвійна сплошна, а така: http://pdd.ua/ua/34/1.11/

Якраз для даного маневру.
Thunder08 (2017-11-16 23:07:07+00:00): Хоча. Знак - тільки направо там є, але тролейбус нібито їде то тому маршруту.
johnny_1982 (2018-01-22 23:18:34+00:00): This changeset adds a lot electronic shops. They obviously do not exist. Is there a reason for this behaviour? Maybe you do not understand, that you add object to a global map, visible for all users.
andi9876 (2017-12-10 08:40:44+00:00): Dear, no attraction there! Please stop add!
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 05:20:31+00:00): also in this changeset: edits to a convenience store in Alaminos, Laguna (address and internet access tags)
hadw (2017-11-12 13:37:03+00:00): Name appears to be incorrectly spelled.  As well as the name that looks like it should be Summer, Drive should not be abbreviated to Driv.  (Names should never be abbreviated to fit.)
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-11-11 05:01:34+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/32 for details
DENelson83 (2018-01-18 06:17:20+00:00): It looks like you have cut Great Central Lake up into three pieces.  Can you fix this, please?
Robert Copithorne (2018-01-19 18:22:04+00:00): Thanks for letting me know.  I'll look in to it and adjust as necessary.
DENelson83 (2018-01-19 19:23:10+00:00): Well, actually, I was able to quickly fix it, just a short time after bringing it to your attention.  Sorry about that.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-11-11 04:59:49+00:00): [San Pedro, Laguna, Muntinlupa, and Las Piñas] add various POIs and number of floor in most buildings
user_5359 (2017-11-11 08:35:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-11-11 05:02:02+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/32 for details
下り専門 (2017-11-11 10:31:12+00:00): こんにちは。この付近の編集レビューをしています。
道路と建物の位置をBing衛星写真にあわせらえているようですが、このエリアはズレが大きく正確ではないように見えます。
GPSログと合わせてみると地理院オルソ化写真(Japan GSI ortho imagely)が正確なのがわかります。
詳しくは以下を参照してください。

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nyampire/diary/36310

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Bing_%E5%9C%B0%E5%9B%B3#.E7.B2.BE.E5.BA.A6

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MAPconcierge/diary/36359

http://img01.hamazo.tv/usr/o/s/m/osmsenmon/2017-11-11s19.14.36.png

http://img01.hamazo.tv/usr/o/s/m/osmsenmon/2017-11-11s19.14.36.png
mavl (2018-08-15 16:19:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет несуществующий автовокзал. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
bhavyakota (2019-04-30 05:01:38+00:00): """                                                                               Hi dennisramadhan,

                               Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across way 539771747
   
                 classified as un-classified. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
                             As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

                                                                                        Thanks in Advance"
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 05:33:39+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
vam_002 (2019-04-23 05:48:03+00:00): "Hi  dennisramadhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 539772475 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Track'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
dennisramadhan (2019-04-23 09:53:05+00:00): yeah you are right. I've changed the tag, please check
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 05:40:16+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
GerdP (2017-11-12 09:14:51+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=unclassifiedth on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120574672
Looks like a highway=residential to me.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-12-27 15:31:21+00:00): [San Pedro, Laguna] revert renaming of United Better Living to a name of a subdivision inside it
user_5359 (2017-11-11 08:34:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
dgitto (2017-11-11 09:57:21+00:00): Ciao. Non si può mettere il numero civico sull'oggetto building, almeno in casi come questo. Infatti sul palazzo sono certamente presenti parecchi civici. Magari su più di una strada
dgitto (2017-11-11 10:01:08+00:00): i civici andrebbero mappati nel luogo fisico in cui si trovano (normalmente un ingresso)
vam_002 (2019-04-23 03:56:16+00:00): Hi  FickyAdityaRomansya,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 536951986
way 539777473
way 536951919
way 539777474" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'service'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 06:51:51+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
4004 (2017-11-11 20:10:47+00:00): спасибо за обновление карты!
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 07:06:50+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
Supaplex (2018-01-21 03:52:50+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。


編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features


由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。


台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/


Happy Mapping!
bhavyakota (2019-04-29 06:51:25+00:00):                                                                                  
  "Hi dennisramadhan,

Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 539779834
way 539779836
  classified as ""un-classified"". However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'. 
   As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

                                                                                        Thanks in Advance"
dennisramadhan (2019-04-29 07:00:57+00:00): you are right, I've changed the tag of those roads
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 07:18:55+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
majid1359 (2017-11-11 07:22:46+00:00): مدرسه نیست پاک شود
mavl (2018-12-25 21:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 07:27:51+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
mavl (2018-12-25 21:04:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].