piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-07-23 20:53:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:54:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mikkolukas (2019-05-16 22:08:20+00:00): Lad venligst være med at slette hele veje, blot for at erstatte dem med tilsvarende veje. Det smadrer hele historikken for de enkelte ways/nodes.

I stedet, lav ændringer til de eksisterende ways/nodes.
ThomasA (2019-05-16 22:23:18+00:00): Nu er det nogle måneder siden, jeg lavede de ændringer, så jeg husker ikke, hvordan det gik til. Det lyder underligt, for jeg plejer ellers ikke at rende at slette veje. Iflg. min kommentar lyder det til, at jeg bare har tilføjet ændret tags på vejene, så jeg har svært ved at forestille mig, at jeg skulle have givet mig til at slette dem og så genoptegne dem. Kan det være en eller anden fejl, JOSM har lavet ifm., at jeg har tagget vejene?
mikkolukas (2019-05-17 00:56:57+00:00): Så trækker jeg lige kløerne lidt tilbage igen :D

Jeg ved ikke om JOSM kan lave den slags fejl :)
ThomasA (2019-05-17 06:44:48+00:00): Hvis jeg på en eller anden måde har slettet vejene, har det ikke været meningen, og jeg skal nok være opmærksom på ikke at gøre det sådan eller, om JOSM kan forårsage noget mystisk.
mavl (2019-07-23 21:06:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:56:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
viloan (2018-10-17 12:57:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-07-23 21:00:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
ndm (2018-10-17 22:16:39+00:00): True, but signage hasn't changed - please revert.
DaveF (2018-10-17 23:38:09+00:00): That maybe the new name of the company, but not the lettering of the signage. You've got ahead of yourself.
Welshie (2018-10-18 17:01:52+00:00): Reverted. operator has been set to Waitrose & Partners. 

There's some cases of franchised branches at some motorway service areas where the Waitrose is actually operator=Welcome Break
bison166 (2018-10-18 06:31:12+00:00): moin tyiori
danke für deine Mitarbeit bei osm. 
ein paar Dinge die mir aufgefallen sind :
- keine Adress tags irgendwo in die Botanik setzen, sondern direkt auf das Gebäude oder das Gebäude direkt mit der Adresse belegen
- unbedingt darauf achten, dass kein "landuse" mit Straßen etc. direkt verbunden wird, bitte korrigiere das bei Gelegenheit. 
Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
Omnific (2018-10-17 15:50:38+00:00): I have reported you to the DWG for instigating an edit war. We will let them make the final judgement. Thank you.
alester (2018-10-18 03:06:26+00:00): I don't understand why you would revert a reversion of a mechanical edit, based on that reversion being a mechanical edit? Do you even have any knowledge of what was happening here? The landuse of these areas was improperly removed, and should be restored. We'll see what the DWG does.
norcross (2018-10-18 17:12:14+00:00): Omnific, please stick to the truth: The original mechanical edit was done by me. And I'm sorry for it.

Then you've reverted my edit, kept the mechanical changes on substations, but restored a superfluous 'tagging for the renderer' (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Aman_made%3Dwastewater_plant&type=revision&diff=1664000&oldid=1639725 ). So the edit war was started by you. Understandingly it was reverted by another user, Benny Goodman.

That you now utilize the DWG to enforce your opinion just shows your unwillingness to discuss things. Is Washington State your private property?
woodpeck (2018-11-01 21:41:01+00:00): DWG here. Most of our members are thousands of miles away from Washington State so while we could just issue some more or less arbitrary rule, it would be much better for the project if you, the local mappers, could agree! From looking at the changes, I'd say that yes, norcross's initial edit was unwarranted and problematic as he himself agrees; Omnific's revert was ok but he's needlessly opened himself up for criticism by blessing some of the edits and reverting others where if the reason for a revert is "undiscussed mechanical edit" you can't keep half of it and revert the rest! Benny Goodman's revert of Omnific's revert has now restored the "norcross" state. Dropping landuse=industrial on the grounds that this is implicit for a water treatment plant is not something that should be done without a discussion on a relevant mailing list. Is there a chance for all of you to discuss this calmly in public? I think the landuse=industrial should be reinstated but, thousands of miles etc. -- by the way, many of these plants seem to violate https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only - I'm sure they are not named "wastewater treatment lagoons" ;)
sejohnson (2018-11-09 20:40:50+00:00): Hi! Tagging looks great, but your traces should align to the exterior of the building, rather than simply a box around the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63610263
pangoSE (2018-10-17 14:13:38+00:00): Bra jobbat! Välkommen till OSM.
Visst är det kul?
Jag reagerar på att du tog bort byggnaden och ritade om i stället för att ändra form bara eftersom det raderar historiken med 4 tidigare versioner.
Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
Mvh
Egil
PS: Gå gärna med i en Telegram-chat, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts
Finns även en specifikt för SE.
mavl (2019-07-23 21:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 21:03:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 21:05:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:53:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:47:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
kartonage (2018-10-18 16:26:10+00:00): Hallo Einar Ranie, 
danke für das Hinzufügen von Gebäuden. Kleiner Tipp für die Bearbeitung mit dem iD-Editor: bei ausgewähltem Objekt kannst du das Objekt mit 's' rechteckig machen. Hilfreich bei Gebäuden, da diese ja meist doch rechteckig sind.

Schöne Grüße!
mavl (2019-07-23 21:00:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:48:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 21:00:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:57:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:56:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:52:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
eggie (2018-10-17 13:45:49+00:00): Dag PJJvStrien,  Wanneer iets oneway=yes is geworden is het bijna altijd zo dat dit niet geldt voor tweewielers.
Je voegt dan toe oneway:bicycle=no
en ivt oneway:moped=no

De fietsroute routeert nu namelijk niet meer.
Graag dus actie of reactie.
Dit waren je edits   https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63610887

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-17 14:12:03+00:00): .. en is dit er al officieel door, want D66 heeft schriftelijk vragen hierover gesteld aan B&W?
Vestrin (2018-10-17 14:33:31+00:00): In de Julianastraat hingen er zakken over de borden. Die kunnen er dus elk moment afgehaald worden. De paaltjes zijn al geplaatst
eggie (2018-10-17 21:07:54+00:00): Oke.. dan zet ik even die accesstags voor fietsers erbij conform de rest van de Julianastraat west, want anders routeert het niet meer goed.
Graag nog checken als de zakken eraf zijn gehaald of het ook voor bromfietsen geldt. 
Het is wel zaak dat het blijft routeren. Er zit in OSM meer verborgen dan je op het eerste gezicht zou denken.
eggie (2018-10-17 21:09:55+00:00): Ik zie dat mapper A67 - A67 het al heeft aangepast.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
smaprs (2018-10-17 23:00:09+00:00): Olá Simone, bem-vinda ao OSM.  
Há algumas dúvidas com os pontos adicionados:  
natural=beach não vai em ponto;  
"leisure=park" vai na área, não no ponto.  
"Name" só para nome próprio; não se coloca "name=Plantação de Eucalipto". Pode colocar "floresta" para mato.  
E ficou adicionada a área do "parque à relação da RS-389 (já corrigi).  
  
Você queria adicionar algum parque novo?  
Podemos ajudar se precisar.  
Para mais informações veja as páginas de etiquetação:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Map_Features
mavl (2019-07-23 21:05:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:53:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:48:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:54:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:57:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:58:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:50:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 20:56:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2019-07-23 21:03:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
muramototomoya (2018-11-10 08:33:28+00:00): こんにちは。

この編集でbuildingウェイオブジェクトの各ノードにwikidata,wikipediaタグがつけられてしまっています。修正をよろしくお願いいたします。
LuxuryCoop (2018-11-11 04:06:43+00:00): wikidataタグがあるノードから、nameタグがないノードのwikidataとwikipediaタグを削除するつもりです｡JOSMでチェックした結果、全てのノードが名無しです。
LuxuryCoop (2018-11-11 04:10:46+00:00): 追加で､タグが二つのノードだけです。
LuxuryCoop (2018-11-11 04:12:28+00:00): https://imgur.com/NygGRq8
muramototomoya (2018-11-12 22:33:28+00:00): 対応ありがとうございました。
mavl (2019-07-23 20:48:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-18 00:11:08+00:00): maxspeed:type=US:urban is 100% useless, it's just not a thing.
eggie (2018-10-17 14:13:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-17 14:15:56+00:00): Goed gelukt, maar probeer svp niet te schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus. Dit levert vaak schade op.
MVG,
eggie
Leo Slager (2018-10-17 23:51:20+00:00): Prima, alle gegevens zijn netjes op de adres-node geplaatst.
mavl (2018-11-23 18:43:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64828864, 64826780 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source].
Leo Slager (2018-10-17 23:44:01+00:00): adresgegevens op een landuse is wel zeer ongebruikelijk. Kun je daar ook post bezorgen ?
Ik verwijder ze.
viloan (2018-10-17 14:10:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-10-17 14:18:02+00:00): Gebouwen zelf horen geen adres te krijgen. Die bevinden zich al op de adresnode als het goed is. Check dat even svp.
Eggie
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-31 11:04:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64041921 where the changeset comment is: Revert pseudo parks added by simon484
Leo Slager (2018-10-17 23:40:48+00:00): correct, de naam van het gebouw kan wel op het gebouw getagd worden. De adresgegevens waren al aanwezig op de adresnode die vanuit het kadaster wordt geîmporteerd.
GerdP (2018-10-20 08:24:20+00:00): Hi again! I fixed another typo
highway=residenta on 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202073668
aleksaJov (2018-10-22 00:08:56+00:00): Hello GerdP,

Thank You for fixing my typo errors from all changesets.

Regards,
Aleksandar
Leo Slager (2018-10-17 23:23:20+00:00): De gebouwen zijn door de gemeente netjes geregistreerd bij het kadaster.
Er zijn dus officiele adressen toegekend.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=149561.32997192&geometry.y=373130.70673218&zoomlevel=5&objectId=0770100000013738&detailsObjectId=0770010000005631
Deze changeset wordt reverted
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-06-20 09:35:22+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1819249 ?
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-23 13:25:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63796060 where the changeset comment is: j'ai revertee certaines choses
R0bst3r (2018-10-18 08:48:32+00:00): Hallo Vermessungsamt,
ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und folgende Anmerkung:
* Du solltest die Position deiner Poller nochmals prüfen. 
Ist der im Norden vielleicht zu nördlich? Er würde an der Kreuzung zum Feldweg oberhalb des Tennisplatzs mehr Sinn machen. Damit bleibt der Feldweg für landw. Verkehr zugänglich.
* Der südliche Poller steht inzwischen Mitten auf dem Parkplatz des Sportvereins. Steht der vielleicht leicht nördlich an der Zufahrt zum Vereinsheim?
* Poller sollten mit der Straße verbunden werden, eine platzierung auf oder daneben hat meines Wissens keine Auswirkung bei manchen Routern.
* Die Staße ist bereits mit access=destination getaggt und auch ein Schlagbaum ist eingetragen auf Höhe des Tennisclubs. Entspricht dies noch der Situation vor Ort?
Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63613653
PT-53 (2018-10-18 06:45:32+00:00): Hallo ppit,
Du hast diesen POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5993500262 neu angelegt. Da fehlt noch das entpsrechende Merkmal.
Schau Dir mal das Wiki zu shop=photo (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dphoto) und craft=photographer (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:craft%3Dphotographer) sowie diese Diskussion https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60957 an.
Da solltest Du das passende finden.

Ergänzt Du den POI noch entsprechend ?

Fragende Grüße
eggie (2018-11-14 14:52:59+00:00): Dag PJJ vStrien. Het is alleen onduidelijk of fietsers nu wel of niet op de Ruigendijkweg mogen/kunnen komen. 
MVG,
eggie
pyram (2018-10-19 14:05:11+00:00): Hi rimugu,

I tryed to fix duplicate nodes ( http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-108.26787&lat=30.28428&zoom=13&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way ). But I can't see a track on bing or find gpx data for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635070348
In addition, the track crosses the river several times without "ford = yes". Is the crossing possible there? With vehicles too?
rimugu (2019-02-07 15:52:32+00:00): Crossing is possible hiking, in some cases in four-wheelers, but not always. The path follows a know hiking route. If you wish to add fords and make the route specific, go ahead.
mavl (2018-11-23 18:43:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64828864, 64826780 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source].