piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:20:56+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_2066394 (2020-08-19 13:15:21+00:00): Gibt's da einen Zeitraum für die Bauarbeiten?

Eintrag mit :conditional würde sich anbieten.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions
landini (2020-08-19 13:24:48+00:00): Keine Ahnung!

Ich wollte da heute mit dem Fahrrad durchfahren, was nur auf illegale Weise ging. 
Die graben dort im ganzen Viertel. Wie lange das dauert weis ich aber nicht.
stephankn (2020-09-06 07:35:53+00:00): way 838534871 is a service road to the hospital, not a tertiary highway. I fixed it for you.
zorglubu (2022-03-08 09:33:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez fait plusieurs corrections de tracé sur des autoroutes, qui ont été refaites dans l'autre sens par d'autres utilisateurs. Et je pense qu'ils ont raison.
Les sorties/entrées d'autoroutes sont mieux représentées par les outils de navigation comme Osmand ou OM, en mettant le nœud de jonction au point où les voies se séparent définitivement (l'extrémité du trait continu).
voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Examples

Par exemple, lorsqu'il y a une voie d'accélération/décélération sur une autoroute à deux voies, on ne garde qu'un seul "way" avec lanes=3 et on ajoute des turn:lanes et éventuellement des maxspeed:lanes

Bien cordialement.
petrovsk (2022-03-08 13:47:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Je prends note de vos remarques et j'appliquerai la clé turn à la prochaine occasion, il est temps de mettre à jour mes méthodes de cartographie.
Cordialement.
zorglubu (2022-03-08 14:32:53+00:00): Merci :-)
Martin Borsje (2020-08-20 05:02:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
trigpoint (2024-08-06 08:51:55+00:00): Hi
This edit has gone a little wrong. Maxspeed:hgv in Scotland is 40 mph, not 50.

Please ensure you are aware of which country you are editing in.

Cheers Phil
user_11435438 (2020-08-22 09:03:55+00:00): Hi, the way you created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838541931 is not guideway, it is just normal BRT
Seandebasti (2020-09-08 06:46:03+00:00): ok thanks, I just indicated there is a route of something what is not mapped. what is BRT?
user_11435438 (2020-09-08 09:37:18+00:00): BRT is bus rapid transit, it means bus dedicated road.
GinaroZ (2020-08-31 17:39:47+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
I've had to revert this changeset as you've misaligned these features. The Bing imagery is slightly offset from the so that needs to be taken into account (you can adjust the offset in the background layer options).
mueschel (2020-08-20 07:30:48+00:00): Could you please explain what you did with this relation?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11518936/history

Somehow you removed all the members and most of the tags and replaced them with some numbers.
ottwiz (2020-08-22 11:03:20+00:00): actually local knowledge, because my friend surveyed it
VA00 (2020-08-19 13:09:23+00:00): Nie można sobie ot tak zmieniać przebiegu szlaku w OSM. Skoro znaki kierują w zarośnięty odcinek, to trudno. Zimą jeździ się tędy zapewne bez problemu.
Adam_Piszczek (2020-08-19 15:24:49+00:00): Problem w tym że tam znaków nie było że jest szlak tylko na osm
Adam_Piszczek (2020-08-19 15:26:27+00:00): Do bani z tym oznakowaniem,znak czerwony a brak tego pomarańczowego kto tak znakuje że tego znaku w terenie nie ma tylko czerwony na słupach.
Adam_Piszczek (2020-08-19 15:29:02+00:00): Jest według https://malopolska.szlaki.pttk.pl/mapa-pttk-malopolska to kto to ma zmienić?już zmieniałem inny i jest prawidłowy.
Adam_Piszczek (2020-08-19 15:29:51+00:00): Proponuje ci się tam wybrać to nawet zimą nie przejedziesz.
Adam_Piszczek (2020-08-19 17:22:28+00:00): OSMapa-SZLAKI chyba jest nie aktualne z tym szlakiem na tym odcinku bo UMP ma tam tak jak pttk przebieg na tym odcinku,podkład szlaków właśnie mam osmapa-szlaki na garminie i tu jest problem https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/50.03667/19.56283&layers=C a co do oznakowania jak powyżej pisze.
VA00 (2020-08-19 19:45:44+00:00): Szlak był zmieniony ok. 2 lata temu. Na innych niż OSM portalach na 100% jest błędny przebieg. A są znaki na ul. K. Wojtyły w Mirowie?
Adam_Piszczek (2020-08-19 20:40:33+00:00): W końcu to jaki kolor tego szlaku czerwony czy pomarańczowy? bo nigdzie tego pomarańczowego nie ma ,jak już to tylko czerwony na słupach,a co do tego to tam są same krzaki,zarośla i zamiast jechać to rower trzeba nieść bo trekkingiem nie ma mowy o przejechaniu zarośla na wysokość człowieka brak znaków że tam szlak jest to w 100 % przebieg zły,a co do koloru to na ul .Windaka Zalas też czerwony znak to gdzie pomarańczowy?,coś nie tak.Czyli piszesz że jest błędny co inne mapy to czemu pttk ma tak właśnie?Nie sprawdzałem na ul.K.Wojtyły bo się wpakowałem w te zarośla.
Adam_Piszczek (2020-08-19 20:44:11+00:00): Tu coś jest https://www.google.pl/maps/@50.0350357,19.56328,3a,32.6y,153.8h,91.16t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s3XXDFlVy7DG-wc7kc76kFQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 
Porażka większość znaków zanika nikt tego nie odnawia.
Adam_Piszczek (2020-08-19 20:58:06+00:00): A co do tego jechałem od Rajska i skręciłem na ul.Piaseczna co tam nawet oznaczeń nie ma a według szlaku z mapy.
Adam_Piszczek (2020-08-19 21:35:50+00:00): https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=2758704&map=17!50.036!19.5648
VA00 (2020-08-20 06:20:28+00:00): waymarkedtrails to jest OSM, tylko inaczej renderowany. Niestety, większość szlaków rowerowych i pieszych wygląda podobnie. Brak oznakowania, chaos i drogi nieistniejące lub nie do przejścia. Kolor pomarańczowy jest formalnie zabroniony przez PTTK nie bez powodu - myli się z czerwonym. Spotykałem już rowerzystów, którzy w niego skręcili w Rudnie będąc święcie przekonani, że jadą szlakiem Orlich Gniazd do Krakowa. Ten pomarańczowy i tak jest po solidnych poprawkach całkiem niedawno, więc jestem zdziwiony, że już znaków nie ma. Podejrzewam, że są pochowane za roślinnością. Dlatego osobiście wolę robić tego typu eksploracje zimą...
Supaplex030 (2020-08-20 12:36:15+00:00): Du hast hier ein paar Büsche mit "natural=scrub" gemappt - das ist aber nur für die "Landnutzung" vorgesehen. Für alleinstehende Büsche gibt es "natural=shrub" :)

Hab es schon geändert.

(siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshrub)
tordans (2020-08-21 04:20:59+00:00): Danke fürs Korrigieren!
muchichka_s (2020-08-19 15:12:01+00:00): Відмінив ці зміни
Dave Venables (2020-08-19 13:24:54+00:00): One Friar Gate Square
AWaltrick (2022-10-23 02:23:00+00:00): boa noite Eric!
Corrigi o traçado da via para o local correto, onde existe acesso para deslocamento de veículos.
Martin Borsje (2020-08-20 05:00:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2020-08-20 05:01:37+00:00): Je hebt nu de nieuwe weg niet laten aansluiten aan de voetgangersweg. Ik heb dat gecorrigeerd
Greoet
osmviborg (2020-08-19 15:22:04+00:00): The routes are now changed and the bridge is removed.
marc__marc (2024-10-05 18:03:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Si tu as des infos sur cette zone, on a 3 jardins étrange :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654560688
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69224036
c'est du indoor ou sur le toit ?

soucis 2 il traverse le lycée https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/829922072
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/829927510
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3531674703
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/829928916

Cordialement,
Marc
Carto'Cité (2024-10-07 13:17:21+00:00): Aucune idée. Dans ce secteur je ne suis jamais passé que sous terre, dans les level négatifs.
Antoine.
Frans S (2020-09-09 12:54:39+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular shape. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
DressyPear4 (2020-08-19 20:13:25+00:00): Revertido, vandalismo!
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:44:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89639378
DressyPear4 (2020-08-19 20:13:31+00:00): Revertido, vandalismo!
DressyPear4 (2020-08-19 20:13:39+00:00): Revertido, vandalismo!
DressyPear4 (2020-08-19 20:13:17+00:00): Revertido, vandalismo!
SomeoneElse (2020-08-23 10:49:30+00:00): Hello DressyPear4,
Rather than just saying "Revertido, vandalismo!" I'd try and understand what the user is actually trying to do here.  I've done that at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3851 (but obviously it's better if the local community comments as their Portuguese will be better than mine/Google's).
A new user deleting lots of things _might_ be vandalism or they might just be trying to create a map that shows only one thing, or think that they are experimenting in an editor sandbox,
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-08-23 10:49:57+00:00): Olá DressyPear4,
Em vez de dizer "Revertido, vandalismo!" Eu tentaria entender o que o usuário está realmente tentando fazer aqui. Eu fiz isso em https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3851 (mas obviamente é melhor se a comunidade local comentar, pois o português deles será melhor do que o meu / do Google).
Um novo usuário excluindo muitas coisas _pode_ ser vandalismo ou pode estar apenas tentando criar um mapa que mostra apenas uma coisa, ou pensar que está experimentando em uma caixa de areia do editor,
Cumprimentos,
Andy
Frans S (2020-10-19 08:51:32+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them
From the 180 buildings you mapped in this area 177 were not fair mapped and squared.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
at next sessions

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-10-13 12:30:35+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Supaplex (2020-08-19 18:52:18+00:00): 不好意思，你有些資料的來源來自其他網站，像是同樣是地圖網站的 Google 地圖，或者是 Walker land 網站。這些網站資料版權都屬於他們的，並不相容 OpenStreetMap 的授權。

另外資料也可以與既有資料重覆，沒有好好檢查重覆狀況。

如果資料有問題，只能回退處理，直到釐清授權狀況。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89641048
SomeoneElse (2020-08-19 15:33:29+00:00): As requested many times before, please, please use more descriptive changeset comments rather than just "fixed relations".
Was the relation wrong because it was broken (e.g. it was a multipolygon that was not closed, or had geometry that was invalid in some other way), or was the geometry calid but it covered the wrong area?
Whichever of these problems it was, please explain what the problem was and how you fixed it.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_8334278 (2020-08-19 15:51:27+00:00): made northbrook, northbrook, made , unincorporated.  unincorporated, seperated deerfield, from unincorporated.
SomeoneElse (2020-08-19 15:55:46+00:00): Er, what?
user_8334278 (2020-08-19 15:58:11+00:00): changed boundaries to match tiger web,added
hidden unincorporated ares.
SomeoneElse (2020-08-19 15:59:50+00:00): Thanks - is there a URL that other people can use to look at the tiger web source used here?
user_8334278 (2020-08-19 16:05:53+00:00): https://tigerweb.geo.census.gov/tigerweb/
SomeoneElse (2020-08-19 16:07:36+00:00): Great - thanks!
jumbanho (2020-08-19 17:48:17+00:00): Thumbs up, you used the census data!
pio2_122 (2020-08-19 14:59:55+00:00): Wystarczy dodać punkt, a nie rysować budynek w budynku :/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89641140
UW Maddie (2020-09-02 12:58:47+00:00): use of bing bird's eye is not allowed so all features that are based on its imagery are deleted
UW Maddie (2020-09-02 13:10:05+00:00): bird's eye is not allowed here because of not having the proper licensing, so i deleted the features that used it to follow rules
smootheFiets (2021-02-01 09:28:32+00:00): Hoi welout,
Ik zie dat je wat paden in en naast het NAM-park heeft ingetekend. Heel goed! Daar wordt de kaart beter van. Alleen een vraag over de tags: je hebt de meeste paden getagged als highway=footway, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838584221 zelfs met bicycle=no. Dat betekent dat je hier niet _mag_ fietsen. Klopt dat wel? Bij het pad hierboven ben ik onlangs geweest, toevallig, en ik had de indruk dat ik hier met mijn dikke-banden-fiets wel overheen mocht. Tenminste heb ik nergens een bordje G7, C14 oid gezien. Ik heb het daarom aangepast naar highway=path (staat by default open voor voetgangers, fietsers, ruiters, ...).
Bedoelde je misschien dat het pad voor de meeste fietsers niet geschikt is? Daarmee ben ik eens. En daarvoor hebben wij het tag smoothness (ik heb hier smoothness=bad van gemaakt).
Graag hoor ik wat je hiervan denkt. En als je nog meer ongemappde padjes vindt, zie ik ze graag verschijnen :)
Groetjes, smootheFiets
welout (2021-02-01 15:42:19+00:00):  Er staan inderdaad geen borden. Maar ik heb ooit de beheerder gesproken van het park en die was niet blij met fietsers op de wandelpaden. Ook zijn veel paden zgn. 'laarzenpaden' maar daar heeft OSM geen officiële optie voor dacht ik.  Vandaar dat ik het zo heb ingesteld.
smootheFiets (2021-02-02 09:23:25+00:00): Ik snap wat je bedoeld. Maar op OSM hebben wij de afspraak "map what's on the ground" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice#Zet_het_op_de_kaart_zoals_het_werkelijk_aanwezig_is
Als de beheerder ergens zichtbaar uitdrukt dat fietsen op onverharde paden niet gewenst is (door een expliciet bord of door tekst op die borden aan de ingang, waar ook staat wanneer honden aan de lijn moeten enzovoort), dan wordt het een echt voetpad. Tot dan is truth on the ground dat je er mag fietsen.

Laarzenpaden: daarvan heb ik ook smoothness=bad gemaakt, geloof ik. very_bad zou ook een optie zijn, daarover twijfelde ik, Heb jij een voorkeur?
welout (2021-02-16 12:39:04+00:00): Duidelijk. smoothness=bad op sommige plekken en verybad op andere plekken. Het hangt eigenlijk ook wel wat van het seizoen af. In de late lente, zomer, en begin van de hersfst is het prima te doen. Maar daarna wordt het blubs. Hoe dan ook, ik ga mn best doen met de andere paden! :)
PT-53 (2020-12-02 07:41:26+00:00): Hallo bigbug21,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diesem Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7826353349/history
ein Hinweis "nonop_confusion_on_nodes" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.70473&lat=48.52928&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=node_with_short_or_long_key,way_with_short_or_long_key,nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways

Sollte da nicht statt
railway=crossover + construction=yes die Kombination
railway=construction + constriction=crossover
verwendet werden?
Siehe Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction?uselang=de

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-12-13 10:21:16+00:00): Hallo bigbug21, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
bigbug21 (2020-12-13 11:44:23+00:00): Melde mich.
PT-53 (2020-12-13 12:25:47+00:00):  "Melde mich." ???
bigbug21 (2020-12-14 20:01:55+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
ich war ein paar Tage nicht in OSM online, habe dir gestern eine kurze Wasserstandsmitteilung geschickt und das ganze nun korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
Peter
PT-53 (2020-12-15 07:19:49+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung und die Berichtigung.
Grüße
MatiasLavik (2020-08-19 15:28:12+00:00): Forgot to mention: this is a "gang-og-sykkelvei" - a road made for pedestrians AND bicycles. There is a barrier preventing cars from entering the road (and the road sign prohibits it as well).
Halbtax (2020-10-15 16:34:18+00:00): Hi
what is the source of your maxspeed tagging. According to my information the tagged value was not was not approved by Swiss authorities.

Greetings
JJJWegdam (2020-10-15 17:37:54+00:00): Hello,
The tag that was used doesn’t exist. I simply replaced it with one that does. For the maxspeed tag, it is sufficient that a track section was designed for a certain speed (check OSM in China for example). If the Swiss authorities make a decision on a new speed limit later, we should change the maxspeed tag at that time (but not before that) in my opinion.
Best regards
Halbtax (2020-10-16 18:38:38+00:00): Hello,

I don't think we should mix any design-maxspeed with an actual approved maxspeed. The maxspeed tag indicates the actual approved maximum speed (Otherwise, many freeways would have a maxspeed in the range of 250). I think mapping is about collecting verifiable data. If we don't have a value for a particular tag, we don't use that tag. So it is clear that the value is currently unknown. Data quality suffers if unverifiable assumptions are used instead. 

For the subject of "tags doesn't exist", I like you to have a look at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_remove_tags_that_you_don.27t_understand an for the "proposed:maxspeed" at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix.

Best Regards
Tomas Straupis (2020-08-20 05:37:11+00:00): Change reverted. iD is offering nonsense changes - never listen to them and try NOT to use iD.
Frans S (2020-08-21 10:56:23+00:00): Hello.
Do not use the hashtag @ Cognizantindia here but use the project hashtag
Also do not add a name to a building with that hashtag
Best regards
Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
user_2066394 (2020-08-19 16:19:23+00:00): Technisch eine sehr lange Bank.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=89643894
Parzelle13 (2020-08-19 19:43:28+00:00): Lösch es einfach. Ich glaube nicht das Go Map-Nutzer CS-Kommentare mitkriegen.
Ich hab noch nie darauf eine Reaktion erhalten.
user_2066394 (2020-08-19 19:49:34+00:00): Ist mir auch grad aufgefallen, hatte da schon mal was kommentiert.
Ist bereinigt.
parsd51 (2020-08-19 17:47:00+00:00): Hi

Please check openstreetmap.org before making a change.
The one is already there.

Greetings
parsd51
user_5359 (2020-08-20 04:45:00+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag telephone = minor_line on a building?
martingggg (2020-08-20 16:41:51+00:00): It's obviously an editing error. I also see a duplicate node and way. I'm happy to fix those errors. Thanks a lot.
bobwz (2020-08-24 16:17:22+00:00): Greetings, TZLNCTV. Could you share your source for the classification changes to the roadways in this changeset? Some of these changes, like the ones to Windy Ridge Parkway or Cumberland Boulevard do not match the Georgia Department of Transportation for these roads.
bobwz (2020-09-01 15:38:05+00:00): I didn't receive a response to this so I'll be working to revert these changes to match road classification provided by the Georgia Department of Transportation.
ftcat (2020-08-21 09:58:24+00:00): Hi,

You are making many many errors with stream directions, even with streams going over ridges and guessing their courses. It takes a great deal of time to correct them and even then I am not sure they are correct.
uliwanne (2020-08-21 11:01:21+00:00): Sorry, can you show me two of this errors!
ftcat (2020-08-21 13:40:23+00:00): Hi uliwanne,

this stream, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814141015#map=15/-14.2283/29.2725 is flowing in the wrong direction. and this one,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809503182#map=17/-14.41701/29.29458, is going over a ridge.

Sometime back I changed all the streams in this area to intermittent and seasonal as they don't always flow but had not changed the directions but have since come back to have a more detailed look and have found many that are flowing in the wrong direction or a link between 2 systems has been assumed and the link is across a ridge. If you use more than one image source such as Bing and Maxar as well as OpenTopoMap for contours you can see these errors. Also the larger roads run along the watersheds so this can give a hint as to direction of flow. At this point along way 429605612, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429605612#map=16/-14.4311/29.1998 I deleted a stream that joined across the watershed. Sometimes you have to zoom right in and examine the imagery carefully to see the water courses.
chlenix (2020-08-19 21:03:01+00:00): good
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89644910
Frans S (2020-08-21 14:57:39+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are below par.
Not accurate at all. 
Please correct your mappings on Task 1000
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
serock (2020-08-19 16:34:38+00:00): Hola emiigon, ya le envié mensaje por los changeset y por mp, pero sigue duplicando las vías, si tiene una duda puede consultar en el foro o enviarme un mensaje, saludos.
Tomas Straupis (2020-08-20 05:42:29+00:00): Nereikia skubėti keisti esamų žymų, dabar teko gerą gabalą atstatyti atgal, tarkim https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580169355 tikrai nėra highway=path, o yra taip kaip ir buvo pažymėta highway=footway, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622075422 dabar pakeista į iš principo neteisingą variantą, kur kelias footway, bet bicycle=designated. Darželių žymos išmėtytos tarp plotinių ir pastatų objektų, tenka rinkti į vieną vietą. Ir toliau yra panašių tokių blogų pakeitimų. Tai geriau būtų susipažinti su žymėjimo taisyklėmis, pasitarti su kitais ir tik tada po truputį keisti.
JustinasT (2020-08-20 09:31:33+00:00): Ačiū, eisiu skaityt dokumentacijos :)
WoodWoseWulf (2020-08-19 23:32:57+00:00): Hi TexanRogue and welcome to OSM!

Do you have more information about Woods Park? There doesn't appear to be anything at this location, and I can't find any information on a park by that name existing anywhere near here.

The other park you added seems to be over a house - did you add it in the correct location?

If you're interested, the OSM wiki has a great page on parks and how to map them:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark