piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2016-07-22 19:33:58+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Here you've added some houses to the middle of the Atlantic ocean, which seems unlikely - I've removed them.
Please also do use meaningful changeset comments - "Actualizar informacion" does not say anything about what you added.  If you are importing data, please also read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import .
Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
Best Regards,
Andy
Hola y bienvenidos a OpenStreetMap!
Aquí hemos añadido algunas casas a la mitad del océano Atlántico, lo que parece poco probable - que les ha quitado.
Por favor también hacer uso de los comentarios del conjunto de cambios significativos - "Actualizar información" no dice nada acerca de lo que ha añadido. Si va a importar los datos, lea también http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n .
Cualquier pregunta, por favor no dude en preguntar!
Atentamente,
Andy
ThiagoPv (2016-07-26 17:12:03+00:00): Boa tarde Erick, tudo bom? Estou analisando seus changesets após a observação de um colega mapeador sobre alguns detalhes em uma de suas edições na Barra. Em especial nessas alterações que fez no Terminal Paralímpico eu havia editado em 15/7 e deixei exatamente como  o trânsito está funcionando na região mas observei que em sua edição você inseriu os seguintes erros:
- alterou o acesso da rotatória superior, onde os carros que vem da Salvador Allende e reativou a pista que estava sendo usada antes;
- retirou o status de construção da pista dos BRTs que chegam e saem do terminal sentido Santa Cruz;
- apagou as pistas com status proposed que estavam conectadas na Avenida Djalma Ribeiro (Barra Bali).

Portanto irei solicitar a reversão desse changeset. Sugiro que participe dos grupos brasileiros do OpenStreetMap no Telegram para tirar dúvidas e debater sobre melhorias nos mapas, evitando dessa forma que essas coisas ocorram.

https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade
https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte
https://telegram.me/osmrj (grupo carioca)
Erick Araujo (2016-07-26 17:49:26+00:00): Thiago, perdão meu amigo, eu me baseei na imagem do satélite, vou pedir para participar dos grupos e com isso erros desse tipo não devem se repetir, desculpas novamente.
naoliv (2016-07-26 18:39:50+00:00): Erick, caso tenha interesse de tirar dúvida, aprender algo ou falar sobre alguma outra coisa, temos vários meios de comunicação (por lista de e-mail, fórum, Telegram, etc):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
MKnight (2016-08-02 18:32:50+00:00): Kannst Du "Mitte März" und Sommer etwas präzisieren?
Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
nemo-xx (2016-08-03 06:45:25+00:00): Das Problem ist, dass die Öffnungszeiten nicht fest sind und je nach Wetter und Saison spontan angepasst werden. Kenne die Hütte selbst von mehreren Besuchen und kenne auch das mit den flexiblen Öffnungszeiten. Eine Webseite dazu: http://www.outdooractive.com/de/imbiss/schwaebische-alb/wasserfallhuette/1637359/
Der Kommentar zu den Öffnungszeiten hilft aber vielleicht wenigstens dem einen oder anderem es richtig einschätzen zu können.
MKnight (2016-08-03 09:22:26+00:00): März-Oktober ist ja schon mal deutlicher, die Regel dafür wäre:

Mar-Oct: Mo-Su,PH 11:00-16:00+ "Kernzeit, Wetterabhängig"; "Oder auf Anfrage"

Korrigierst Du das?
nemo-xx (2016-08-03 19:36:13+00:00): Öffnungszeiten geändert - bin mal gespannt, wie das z.B. in osmand oder maps.me rüberkommt (dauert aber)...
MaestroGlanz (2022-03-09 09:44:09+00:00): Should the chapel in Traunstein really have tourism=attraction as a separate node?
GinaroZ (2016-11-18 22:58:32+00:00): Hi, I notice walls like this http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432584884 have a name and place tag on them - surely some mistake?
rob_michel (2016-11-25 12:05:52+00:00): Hi, thank you for spotting this and letting me know. I must have picked up the tagging info from one of the area polygons! Had a quick scout around to find any others and think I picked them all up. I have made the amendments with some improvements I am currently working on in the area.
All the best,
Rob
naoliv (2016-08-04 01:40:08+00:00): Is this "Pokemon" a real place or it's a virtual place from Pokémon GO game, please?
Baimbekka (2016-08-04 06:34:36+00:00): Real place.  A gift shop called Pokemon Center at Osaka Station.  I forgot I had my settings on to send the change to everyone.  My bad.
naoliv (2016-08-08 12:08:00+00:00): Do you know if it's the same places as this one? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4328301119
They are very close to each other and the name is also very similar (oneis "Pokemon Center" and the other one is "pokemon centre")
mueschel (2016-09-04 13:30:51+00:00): Hi,
this changeset added many ways with strange tags, none of them is a common OSM tag. Could you check them and tag them with meaningful keys?
Jan
Prof Müller J (2016-09-04 13:58:13+00:00): Thank you, that was an un-intentional import of borders of forest management zones. I will delete this changes and continue by following the OSM procedure of data import.
Kind regards,
Joachim
Prof Müller J (2016-09-05 20:09:58+00:00): could you please guide me how to withdraw this changeset?
mueschel (2016-09-05 20:20:44+00:00): Do I understand correctly, you want to delete all data from this changeset, including all 22000 nodes? This is a bit tricky because the changeset is huge. I know there are some experts in the german OSM forum who know how to deal with that.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-05 20:22:45+00:00): I can revert it if you like (I now have lots of practice reverting changsets too large to download!) - just let me know (to avoid two people trying to do it at once).
Prof Müller J (2016-09-06 09:55:49+00:00): Dear Andy,
yes, please kindly revert it. I was not aware, that I imported more than  the Mawne River Reserve (which I reverted myself). 
Thank you and kind regards,
Joachim
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-09-07 00:14:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41967657 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of Mawne Forest reserver (on request).  See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40953903
SomeoneElse (2016-09-07 10:27:47+00:00): Hi Joachim,
Hopefully all is OK now.  It might be worth checking a sample to make sure that there aren't any remaining issues - the OSM API was "playing hard to get" about midway through the revert.
Best Regards,
Andy
Prof Müller J (2016-09-07 12:05:28+00:00): Dear Andy,
thank you very much! As far I can see, there are no "remainings". Meanwhile I do understand, why it is important to strictly follow the OSM procedure for data imports.
Cheers, Joachim
Viajero Perdido (2016-07-22 16:29:54+00:00): Also source=local knowledge
SomeoneElse (2016-07-22 22:14:01+00:00): Hello Prof Müller,
The tags on http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6431022 look very strange indeed.  Typically tags like these are removed from data before it is uploaded to OSM.  Presumably it is an import from the source listed in the changeset comment?  Under what licence was the data provided?  Did you discuss the import first as per http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
Best Regards,
Andy
Prof Müller J (2016-07-23 15:04:50+00:00): Dear Andy,
I do apologize for importing without learning about the procedure. Thank you for your comment and your advice. I immediately started now the procedure. I already asked World Resources Institute for permission. to use the data (free download) on OSM. I also registerd to the mailing lists and will start the discussion. I would understand when data would be removed - or should I remove it myself? However, the borders of the Mawne Forest Reserve are very important for our work in the neigbouring villages.
Kind regards,
Joachim
SomeoneElse (2016-07-24 09:50:57+00:00): Thanks Joachim - let's wait until you get a reply from the data source, and until people have had a chance to comment on the data.  I'd expect that at least some of the tags would need to be removed (e.g. "SUPERFICIE=0"), but let's wait to check that the data source is OK licence-wise before doing anything else.
Best Regards,
Andy (on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group)
Prof Müller J (2016-07-25 09:41:28+00:00): Dear Andy, I got following reply from WRI:

Dear Professor Joachim,

Thank you for the interest on Cameroon Forest atlas data. These data are shared under free license: Creative Commons (CC-BY-4.0).
For specific use on publications under special platforms like OSM, you can cite the source. Since, the data are being updated regularly, if you need a special statement that authorize you to display some information on OSM platform, please get in touch with our colleague Thomas Maschler in copy of this Mail. He is based at WRI Headquarter at Washington DC, and is in charge of data publications of all the Congo Basin countries atlases ( Cameroon, Congo Brazzaville, DRC, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, RCA). Please, find the links that can be helpful for your activities in other Countries’ atlases in the table below:
Table skipped
Best regards


Duclaire Mbouna
Coordonnateur National - Cameroun
World Resources Institute
UICN-WRI BP : 5506 Yaoundé
WRI.org
SomeoneElse (2016-07-25 10:07:13+00:00): Hi Joachim,
Thanks for your reply.  Unfortunately I suspect that CC-BY-4.0 may have incompatible attribution requirements: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility .  What I suspect that you'll need to do is ask for explicit permission for use in OpenStreetMap.  People on the imports list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports or the legal-talk list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk may be able to help with how to go forward from here.
Best Regards,
Andy
Prof Müller J (2016-07-25 13:23:45+00:00): Dear Andy,
WRI was responding promptly and positive, see answer below. However, by the current communication with the WRI.staff in Cameroon, I came to know that the status of the Mawne River Forest Reserve just recently changed to "Forest Management Unit" and I have to figure out, whether this still justifies to be included to OSM. Furthermore the borders have been sligthly adjusted together with the status change. That means that - if ever - the latest data should be imported. So I would prefer to remove the data, I have uploaded - or should better you do this? Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I learned a lot by your advice.

Thank you and kind regards  
Joachim

Here the answer of WRI:
>Dear Joachim,

Our forest atlases are already listed as potential data sources for OSM

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_Datasources#WRI_Forest_Atlases

The corresponding data share agreement can be found here

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:WRIdataShareAgreement.png

Best,

Thomas
SomeoneElse (2016-07-25 13:30:10+00:00): You can remove it if you like, or if you'd rather than I did I don't mind removing it - just let me know.
Prof Müller J (2016-07-26 13:25:53+00:00): Dear Andy,
I have deleted the imported data. May I contact you here in this thread, incase I would import new data?
Kind regards, Joachim
SomeoneElse (2016-07-26 13:47:51+00:00): Thanks - I'll get emails if you comment here, so that's as good a way as any if you want to talk to me.
I'd ask via the imports list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports about any imports though - people there will have more experience of doing imports than me.
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-11-09 19:37:43+00:00): Super że dodałeś drogę dla rowerów, jest jednak drobny problem - zerkniesz na http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/777742 ?

Obstawiam że problem został spowodowany przez interfejs iD, chciałbym ustalić co autor miał na myśli by poprawić problem w iD i na mapie.
user_5359 (2016-07-22 19:00:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t add a address node to the middle of street. Please move him to the right side of the street.
Euskirchener (2016-07-22 19:20:45+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Kurz zur Erklärung: Du hast mit der App „Maps.me“ eine Bearbeitung gemacht. Diese Änderung ist bei OpenStreetMap in die Datenbank eingetragen worden und du hast dir dadurch einen OSM-Account erstellt. Wie ich sehe, hast du als Inhaber dein Fotogeschäft bei OSM eingetragen. Soweit so gut. Meine Verbesserungsvorschläge: es kann noch die Faxnummer und die Öffnungszeiten eingetragen werden. Bei den Öffnungszeiten gibt es allerdings eine bestimmte Syntax, wie man das formulieren muss. Wenn du noch nicht sicher bist, wie man das macht, kann ich das auch übernehmen. Was aber viel wichtiger ist: Die Adresse. Da ist im Moment nur die Postleitzahl eingetragen. Da sollte aber noch mindestens Straße, Stadt und Hausnummer dazu. Spreche das mit mir ab, wer von uns die Verbesserung übernimmt. Und dann noch ein Tipp: solltest du Interesse haben, neben dem Eintrag deines Geschäftes noch weitere Beiträge zu OpenStreetMap zu leisten, rate ich dir von der Benutzung der App „maps.me“ ab. Die Bearbeitungsfunktion dort hat nur eingeschränkte Möglichkeiten und das Kartenmaterial ist nicht auf dem aktuellen Stand, sodass häufig Fehler damit passieren. Melde dich dann hier in der Diskussion zurück, damit ich benachrichtigt werde!
Gruß, CorrectMapper
Euskirchener (2016-07-22 19:27:36+00:00): Ach und kleiner Nachtrag (war mir vorhin nicht aufgefallen): es ist genau das passiert, was mit dieser App leider häufig passiert: Du hast ein Duplikat erstellt! Der Fotoladen war doch schon auf der Karte eingetragen! Du hättest anstatt einen neuen Eintrag zu erstellen einfach den bereits vorhandenen überarbeiten müssen! Ich werde mich auf jeden Fall um die Beseitigung des Problems kümmern. Du gibst mir die nötigen Informationen.
user_5359 (2016-07-30 14:53:19+00:00): Die Dublette ist jetzt entfernt worden.

Falls Dich das Thema OSM weiter interessiert: Am 16. August ist wieder ein Bonner OSM Stammtisch: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bonn/Stammtisch

Viel Spass mit OSM!
Владимир К (2016-12-08 10:04:43+00:00): что за лестница?
derredu (2016-07-22 20:06:59+00:00): Hallo tripeng.
Was bedeutet "th" ?
tordans (2019-05-04 17:55:30+00:00): Hallo @anbr, du hast hier an vielen Stellen sowohl einzelne Bäume als auch "tree_row" eingetragen. Mein Verständnis ist, dass es ein entweder-oder ist. IMO sind die einzelnen Bäume sinnvoller, dann kann man auch die "ref=123" (Schild am Baum) eintragen. Ich würde bei Gelegenheit anfangen die Tree-Rows dort zu entfernen, wo Einzelbäume eingetragen sind.
Viele Grüße
RemiBovard (2017-01-16 15:26:32+00:00): Please do no translate main name but use attribute `lang:xx` for translation. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names
GOwin (2016-07-23 00:25:27+00:00): Are geoMapTool edits moderated by GeoThings?
Владимир К (2016-07-26 11:55:01+00:00): на парковку наверно amenity=parking надо довесить?
chnav (2016-07-23 08:24:12+00:00): Привет, у нас общественная карта и не место для персональнх точек. Пожалуйста если хотите улучшать карту то ставьте правильные теги, а не автобусные остановки в горах.
user_5359 (2016-07-23 05:07:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice You add „Kalustyan’s“ to the wrong building.
*Martin* (2019-05-29 16:50:55+00:00): Cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263138315 je sukromna na peso no nie pre bicykel? Lebo to tie tagy vravia.
*Martin* (2019-05-29 16:52:41+00:00): Podobne https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316067083. Tie access tagy su dost divoke. Aka je tam prosim dopravna znacka? Teda podla tagov ich tam bude asi viac.
Mirecnet (2019-05-30 14:17:59+00:00): Pred rokom bolo tri mesiace zakaz chodit na bajku a aj peso pre kalamitu. Mozno v tom case to bolo tagovane. Je tam teraz natiahnuta nova asfaltka a dolina je uz plne otvorena. Treba to opravit.
Mirecnet (2019-05-30 14:21:20+00:00): Turistov aj cyklistov vykázali z Jánskej doliny
https://myliptov.sme.sk/c/20804518/turistov-aj-cyklistov-vykazali-z-janskej-doliny.html
*Martin* (2019-05-30 15:29:57+00:00): No praveze tagy nevravia o zakaze bicyklovania. Hovoria ze:
- standardny vstup je povoleny len vlastnikovi (kto je vlastnik?)
- bicyklom tam smie ist kazdy
- zakaz vjazdu motorovym vozidlam (ani "vlastnik" nemoze)
- zakaz vjazdu autam (zbytocne, kedze je to pokryte vyssie)
- zakaz vjazdu motorkam (zbytocne, kedze je to pokryte vyssie)
- zakaz vjazdu vozidlam (od bicykla po kamiony)

Takze celkom zaujimava kombinacia.
Commodoortje (2016-07-23 15:45:07+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert. POI was al aanwezig. Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
RoterEmil (2017-12-14 09:48:07+00:00): Hallo, ich habe den Eintrag "Zuhause" soeben entfernt. Bitte keine privaten Einträge bei OSM machen, sondern nur Daten von "öffentlichem Interesse". Nur so kann die Datenqualität bei OSM erhalten bleiben und davon profitieren auf lange Sicht alle, auch Du :)
Danke und schönen Tag Dir :)
Piskvor (2016-07-25 08:53:39+00:00): Not an attraction. Reverted in 41006063.
30303020 (2018-05-19 13:05:06+00:00): Hey,
did you mark your home in this edit?
Nakaner (2018-03-06 08:37:41+00:00): Hallo sct06595,

du hast vor über einem Jahr hier ein paar Bänke ergänzt und bist deiner Quellenangabe zufolge vor Ort gewesen.

Benutzer DD1JG und ich haben Zweifel, dass die Änderungen des Benutzers kingmojoe der Realität entsprechen. Es handelt sich um einen Spieler von Pokémon Go. Diese Leute sind dafür bekannt, alles, was grün ist, als Park (leisure=park) zu erfassen, weil dann die Pokémon-Viecher dort auftauchen (siehe auch http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/)

Könntest du mit deiner Ortskenntnis bzw. deinen Erinnerungen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56898623 kommentieren?

Im Voraus vielen Dank für deine Mithilfe.

Viele Grüße

Michael
5m4u9 (2016-07-23 07:47:49+00:00): este era el usuario quien cambio los ref's?

en tus cambios hay un error en los ford's. No es necesario añadir al comenzo y al final si el vado es más que un nodo, si es una vía cortar el pedazo y ahí añadir ford=yes.
Allroads (2016-08-28 13:03:55+00:00): The fords, where on the way, before then you do not make, fords on node!!
JJIglesias (2016-08-28 13:07:49+00:00): Fords could be perfectly being done in Nodes. Ford Nodes produce a Proximity alarm in the GPS. Segments DO NOT. how this are off-road roads Drivers needs warnings of the Fords. That's why the nodes are marked in that way.
BsRgds JJ
Allroads (2016-08-28 14:48:22+00:00): This is wrong. Basic rule OSM. Do not tag for the render.
Only 1 node allowed on a ford, better to use only on a way, is describes the situation better, you see also how long a ford is. A better gps or application could understand the data. Such things should be solved in GPS or application.
JJIglesias (2016-08-28 15:21:14+00:00): Hi Gerald
 
However the Rivers in our areas are depicted as a line, in deep they are NOT physically, mostly of the rivers require to be drawn as Riverbank the Ford Nodes still work fine once those riverbanks will be drawn in a future.
 
About the GPS Brands it Happen as well with Garmin (eTrex, Nuvis, Zumos, Montanas, Monterras, etc) also with OSMAND+, or MAPS.ME ; other brands could not use OSM data.
BsRgds JJ
marczoutendijk (2016-10-24 18:02:19+00:00): Wat is Dikke Ans?
marczoutendijk (2016-10-26 19:10:55+00:00): Geen reactie van je en na deze gebruikersopmerking:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/757071
Zal ik je toevoeging weer verwijderen.
Supaplex (2016-07-23 16:21:58+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
user_5359 (2016-07-23 05:16:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding the cinema. Can you please add the new streets in this area, too?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:29:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:29:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.