piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SHARCRASH (2021-10-08 10:29:43+00:00): Hi! I noticed you deleted this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93197889 I believe you didn't make it in purpose, so please be careful.

Also i noticed you added this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/928252718 but with access=no + other specific mobilities. Key "access" is for all no exception, no need to add more then (i removed already the extra useless tags). Please, can you tell me why you tagged it as "access=no"? 

Last time i asked you a question related to illogical access combinations, you didn't answer. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73803020 Please be responsive, hence cooperative, otherwise it is badly seen. Thanks for your comprehension!
SHARCRASH (2021-10-08 10:33:53+00:00): Sorry wrong link about deleted way, it was this original way deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33224777/history which then i merged with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386174547 since they have equal tags.
NieWnen (2021-04-09 18:20:46+00:00): Jest ok
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102638671
!bm (2021-04-09 18:01:54+00:00): Hallo Der_Kartograf,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

Beachte bitte OSM-Grundlagen – ganz allgemein[1] und im konkreten Fall: Name ist nur der Name – nutze name=* nicht, um Dinge zu beschreiben [2].

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben

Fehler entsprechend korrigiert.

--besteGrüße!bm
eggie (2021-04-09 12:03:47+00:00): Hi XRH

What is your intention removing XR from OSM?

Greetz,
eggie
marczoutendijk (2021-04-09 13:26:40+00:00): User blocked for vandalism:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4887
eggie (2021-04-09 13:28:15+00:00): reverted by changeset #102646726
Becky Candy (2021-05-12 16:51:03+00:00): Great mapping ,Thank you  for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102639044
marczoutendijk (2021-04-09 13:26:32+00:00): User blocked for vandalism:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4887
eggie (2021-04-09 13:27:54+00:00): reverted by changeset #102646702
eggie (2021-04-09 12:12:13+00:00): Hi XRH  Why deleting an office=ngo from OSM again? 

Greetz,
eggie
marczoutendijk (2021-04-09 13:25:59+00:00): User blocked for vandalism:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4887
eggie (2021-04-09 13:27:28+00:00): reverted by changeset #102646681
literan (2021-04-09 16:12:38+00:00): не надо выдумывать свои правила. Здесь все замаплено согласно вики.
rbuffat (2021-04-09 14:37:46+00:00): Hallo Lirum Larum
Bevor du weitere Wanderwege erstellst, könntest du bitte meinen Kommentar in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102354565 durchlesen?
lg rene
WalthamCity (2022-10-29 13:07:57+00:00): I’m here on the ground and this playground doesn’t seem to exist. Has it been removed?
WalthamCity (2022-10-29 13:19:47+00:00): There is a new large playground elsewhere in the park which I have just added to the map. This one must have been removed. I will delete it.
Parzelle13 (2021-04-13 02:11:37+00:00): Wurde die Schranke abgebaut?
literan (2021-04-09 16:09:04+00:00): в адресных тегах должно быть просто Перхушково (аналог названия на контуре place, опоясывающем населенный пункт)
Руслан Т (2021-04-12 07:39:15+00:00): Добрый день! 

Поправил.
Спасибо!
Frans S (2021-04-26 12:57:57+00:00): Hello Henk.
Please use tags 'service" only on private or industrial road. See relevant wiki,
Here. higway =residential is better
Best regards
blackboxlogic (2021-04-13 15:56:08+00:00): Oh hi, looks like I came back just after you and changed this back to trunk without realizing you had just changed it. I was trying to follow the advice in the wiki that a roundabout highway tag should be the "highest" of the roads that feed it and I think trunk is "higher" than primary. What do you think?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102643020
Kai Brühne (2021-04-15 08:45:10+00:00): Hi, I changed it to primary, because most routing apps for bicycles seem to strictly avoid trunk roads and this roundabout is part of the East Coast Greenway. I didn't know the rule, so let's leave it to trunk, of course, and you have already solved my problem by setting bicycle=yes. Thanks, Kai
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102643020
blackboxlogic (2021-04-15 14:59:56+00:00): I didn't know that Trunk excluded bikes until I asked about your change in slack. It makes me want to review all "trunk" and make sure they have bicycle=yes, foot=yes where needed.
frodrigo (2021-04-09 12:38:02+00:00): Salut. Juste pour te dire que tu n'es pas obligé d’envoyer les objets un par un au serveur. C'est même mieux de les envoyer par groupes en particulier par localisation ou thématique. Ça permet aux autres d'y voir plus clair dans les listes de changements.
4004 (2021-04-15 13:36:22+00:00): тот же мог аргумент
Rico557 (2021-04-16 06:05:42+00:00): А тут - гора.
bbmiller (2021-04-14 18:07:15+00:00): FYI these new Sleeping Bear areas that you added should get added to the larger Sleeping Bear relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/812810#map=13/44.6879/-86.1013
Brian562 (2021-04-14 18:17:35+00:00): I hadn't thought to do that, thanks!

Is this the correct? Setting up relations can be tricky for me
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102946379#map=14/44.6720/-86.1014
bbmiller (2021-04-14 18:52:15+00:00): Yeah, relations aren't the most straightforward thing. You're close, the only thing to do still is to take the tags off of the individual ways that you added to the relation. That way the information is only entered once.
Becky Candy (2021-05-12 17:01:47+00:00): Great mapping, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102645065
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 12:49:07+00:00): Hi,

bei Telefonnummern bitte das internationale Format nutzen (also "+49 40 123...", also nicht "+49 (0)40 123...") und bei Öffnungszeiten bitte keine deutschen Tage, sondern "Th" statt "Do" zum Beispiel.
Habs hier mal korrigiert.

Grüße
Hauke
Patchanka (2021-04-09 15:17:04+00:00): bonjour
une bonne pratique quand vous ajoutez un escalier serait de le relier à un chemin ou une route.
En effet, s'il n'est relié à rien, jamais un GPS pourra nous proposer de prendre cet escalier !
C'est valable pour tous les types de highway (routes, pistes cyclables, chemins piétons...)
Je viens de rajouter un chemin piéton qui rejoint la rue.
Bonne soirée
Nathan OT Terres de Chalosse (2021-04-09 15:53:14+00:00): merci pour vos précisions
mueschel (2021-04-15 13:55:01+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Could you explain what these nodes represent? 
Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.
PT-53 (2021-04-10 05:40:43+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
Du hast an diesem Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147309100/history
das Merkmal
building=yes
gelöscht und dafür das Merkmal
landuse=garages
eingetragen. Das ist falsch. Landuse=garages wird für ein größeres Garagen-Gelände verwendet. Dort ist aber nur ein Garagen-Gebäude.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=garages?uselang=de
Berichtigst Du Deine Änderung wieder?

Fragende Grüße
eggie (2021-04-09 13:38:30+00:00): Dag Sagittarius..
Wellicht https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross
historic=wayside_cross

Een man_made=cross is meer een enorm kruis op een berg.

MVG
eggie
Dodko (2024-02-13 20:12:28+00:00): Slovo ulica do názvu ulíc nedávame
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/NEJlJhUbhWA/m/QZgF71ZpBwAJ
miguel111 (2024-02-13 20:41:09+00:00): Je to jediná ulica v MI ktorá má v názve slovo ulica. Oficiálny názov je "Ulica pri duši" podľa VZN MU Michalovce. Čiže aj ľudia v OP majú zapísané so slovom ulica. Pohľadajte si  a preštudujte si oficiálne názvy ulíc na stránke MU MI.
Dodko (2024-02-13 20:53:28+00:00): A pritom každá ulica by mala mať slovo ulica v názve, budeme potom v navigáciách zakaždým písať slovo ulica? Alebo v jednej obci áno v druhej nie? Niekde majú nové ulice s názvom ulica a staré nechali bez.
Preto sa dohodlo že sa to nebude dávať, aby nebol chaos pri hľadaní.
miguel111 (2024-02-13 21:01:53+00:00): Je to jediný špecifický prípad v MI, keď  sa rozhodlo , že slovo "Ulica" je súčasťou názvu. Ostatné tabule ulíc majú tiež v názve ulica, ale nie sú už súčasťou názvu ulice.
Dodko (2024-02-13 21:15:43+00:00): V Trnave má 296 ulíc v názve slovo ulica, majú byť teda takto pomenované v OSM?

Ako bude človek vedieť kedy má hľadať so slovom ulica a kedy bez a čo Levice kde si zmysleli dať pred názov ulice skratku Ul.?
https://mylevice.sme.sk/c/5965066/doklad-s-nespravnou-ulicou-moze-byt-podla-policie-neplatny.html

Ako by si zapísal Bardejov kde nedávajú za bodku medzeru a majú takéto oficiálne ulice?
29.augusta
9.mája
Astrová ulica
B.S.Timravy
J.Grešáka
Klinčeková ulica
Kpt.Nálepku
M.V.Miškovského
Nám.arm.gen.L.Svobodu
Sv.Jakuba
T.Ševčenku
tak to potom majú ľudia aj na občianskom.

Zvolenčania rovnako neovládajú pravopis a vytvorili ulice
1.Mája
9.Mája
A.Bernoláka
E.M.Šoltésovej
J.Jesenského
miguel111 (2024-02-13 21:35:55+00:00): V MI ovládame pravopis a tiež mame presne definované znaky pre každú ulicu, ktoré sa musia úradne používať. Žiadne iné skratenia mien ani rozpisovanie mien sa nepoužíva. Napr. "Alex. Markuša". Musíte písať ako stroj, presne bodky, medzery, veľkosť znakov. V tom jedinom prípade "Ulici pri duši" s veľkým "U" berte tak, že v súbore znakov pre označenie tejto ulice je slovo "Ulica".
Dodko (2024-02-13 21:42:48+00:00): Takže aj túto ulicu Ľudovíta Pavla https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009637660 treba premenovať na Ulica Ľudovíta Pavla?
Dodko (2024-02-13 21:50:57+00:00): Máte tam aj tieto ulice
Ulica Ferdinanda Alexu
Ulica Michala Slávika
Dodko (2024-02-13 21:53:25+00:00): ešte som našiel jednu
Garbiarska ulica
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974421732
miguel111 (2024-02-13 22:00:50+00:00): Skontrolujem ich zajtra podľa oficialneho zoznamu ulic. Zrejme budu zle.
miguel111 (2024-02-13 22:38:55+00:00): Všetky sú nové ulice. Ešte som ich ani nezaregistroval. A skutočne to majú aj ony oficialne v nazve. Bohužiaľ. Tak sú zapisane do katastra a taky sled znakov pre oznacenie sa bude pouzivat. Viď ZBGIS.
miguel111 (2024-02-14 06:16:34+00:00): Vzhľadom na to, že nejaký nový človek čo rozhoduje o názve ulíc začal porušovať 40 rokov starý zaužívaný princíp, navrhujem to označiť klúčmi takto: "name=Ľudovíta Pavla" a ešte katastrálne označenie "official_name=Ulica Ľudovíta Pavla".  Bude to každému jasné ako to je.
Kľuč s názvom "official_name" som použil už v minulosti pri všetkých uliciach, ktoré som ja označoval.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
user_5359 (2021-04-10 06:38:20+00:00): Hello!  You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this (and others) change set. 
CODEAS	61410112
CODEZS	614101
EDITE_PAR	OMS BENI GIS TEAM
EDIT_DATE	2018-12-29
FIABILITE	HAUTE
NOMAS	RUGHENDA
NOMZS	KATWA
NOMZSAS	KATWA-RUGHENDA
OBJECTID	842
PAYS	RDC
POINT_X	29.3210640957
POINT_Y	0.108563840463
PROVINCE	NORD KIVU
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning (!) of the keys.
See https://www.osm.org/way/928259030,
https://www.osm.org/way/928259024,
https://www.osm.org/way/928309331
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
ottwiz (2021-04-09 14:07:15+00:00): I also used Bing to add some roads that couldn't be seen from the trees.
ottwiz (2021-04-09 14:07:26+00:00): (bing imagery you know)
Tolstoi21 (2021-04-09 14:51:02+00:00): Hei, kiitos lisäyksistäsi karttaan, mutta mm. Lauttasaarentiellä kulkevia pyöräteitä EI pidä merkata omiksi viivoikseen, koska ne kulkevat Meripuistontien risteyksen jälkeen länteen päin Lauttasaarentien kanssa samassa tasossa pyöräkaistoina eivätkä erillisinä pyöräteinä. Tämä on siis ihan merkittävä tieto, joka olisi hyvä säilyttää. Eli pyörätiet ovat jo kartan datassa Lauttasaarentien tiedoissa "cycleway=lane"-tagilla. Peruskartta ei valitettavasti näytä näin tagattuja pyöräkaistoja erikseen, mutta pyöräkartassa ne näkyvät. Ja se, että pyörätie kulkee tien kanssa samassa tasossa kaistana eikä rotvallilla erotettuna pyörätienä on tärkeä tieto säilyttää, ja imaistaan juuri tuolla "cycleway=lane" -tagilla.
sutsisatsi (2021-04-09 14:53:56+00:00): Kiitos erinomaisesta huomiosta Lauttasaarentietä koskien!
sutsisatsi (2021-04-09 15:05:55+00:00): Cycle path-merkinnän voi myös tägätä cycleway:lane tai cycleway:track, joten jospa vain laittaisi pyöräkaistoihin tuon lane-tagin? Selkeyden vuoksi noiden pyöräkaistojen olisi kai hyvä näkyä erikseenkin – onko haittaa jos sama tieto löytyy sekä ajoradan että pyöräkaistan tiedoista?
Tolstoi21 (2021-04-09 15:20:17+00:00): Hei, ja kiitos kysymästä! Valitettavasti näin ei kannata menetellä. Tai suoraan kysykseen vastatakseni: on selvää haittaa, jos kartalla on merkattuna useaan kertaan teitä tai kaistoja, joita on todellisuudessa olemassa vain yksi. On tosiaan harmi, ettei peruskartta ota renderöinnissään huomioon noita pyöräkaistoja, mutta on tärkeää, ettei karttaan lisää dataa vain jotain renderöijää tai kuvaustapaa silmälläpitäen. cycleway=lane Lauttasaarentien highway-viivassa kertoo siis jo, että tiessä kiinni kulkee pyöräkaista ja uuden viivan lisääminen sitä varten tuottaisi dataan uuden haamutien, jota luonnossa ei ole. Huomaathan, että esim. juuri tuo pyöräkartta (jonka saa esiin tuosta "karttanäkymä"-lehdestä oikeassa laidassa) osaa piirtää pyöräkaistat näkyviin ja jokainen pyöräreitittäjä osaa ohjata pyörät ajamaan pyöräkaistaa pitkin. Eli ei uusia haamupyöräteitä vain peruskarttakuvaa varten. Peruskartta ei voi millään ottaa piirtoasetuksissaan huomioon kaikkia mahdollisia tageja, vaan optimoi piirtoaan yleiskarttaa varten. Siksi OSM datasta voi piirtää omilla preferensseillään karttoja, jotka ottavat eri tageja huomioon, ja on tärkeää, ettei samoja teitä piirrä useaan kertaan. Pyöräkaistojahan löytyy Helsingistä aika lailla, esim. Mechelininkadulta ja Jätkäsaaresta.
sutsisatsi (2021-04-09 16:19:33+00:00): Kiitos, kun avasit asiaa – poistin nämä viimeisimmät pyörätielisäykset.
ToniE (2021-04-09 14:28:17+00:00): ... ist nicht "963 Leutstetten" ...
VictorIE (2021-04-10 09:04:14+00:00): Hi,

Does the R407 now go via Millennium Link Road?
jmkie (2021-04-11 22:35:03+00:00): Presumably this is the routing, but the new signage pointing to this section of Millennium Link Road explicitly has this road reference hidden under temporary grey paint. Possibly pending legal update. https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=116842910&postcount=4266
and video at https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=116860992&postcount=4268
user_3022894 (2021-04-09 14:22:27+00:00): Ach, und das historic=monument des ehem. Bahnhofs Alstätte passte ja wohl auch nicht. Ist als "name" am Gebäude vorhanden, ich denke, das ist okay so.
Horza (2021-04-09 16:15:33+00:00): Thanks for the contributions but most of these buildings are square/rectangular. You can use the square tool in iD (click on the building then press Q, or right-click then click the thing that looks like a square from the menu) to improve your mapping of these
Patchanka (2022-08-12 15:18:29+00:00): bonjour
on est d'accord que ce point ne correspond pas à un parc qui s'appellerait "point photo" ?
Patchanka (2022-08-12 15:23:09+00:00): oups excusez moi celui-ci a été supprimé. C'est celui là : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4788782716
Kha_nam (2021-04-12 09:27:39+00:00): Hi chenjiajun
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 36684799
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102789941
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102650879
Ludhiana (2021-04-09 14:40:05+00:00): Do you know how to straighten building outlines? Press "Q" on a rectangular building.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
aweech (2021-04-09 18:12:01+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edit, as you requested, and I think it's mostly good. One mistake I found was that you added some building tags in weird places (like on the gas station relation), but those were a quick fix.
Happy mapping!
sdoorex (2021-04-16 16:23:09+00:00): Thanks for the review and feedback, that's quite helpful.  I see what you mean about the tags on on your edit.
IlBano (2021-04-24 17:17:15+00:00): Ciao voschix.
In questo changeset hai rimosso la way che consentiva di immettersi su Corso Sempione arrivando da Via Gemona (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536455326).
L'incrocio è effettivamente cambiato in questo modo, oppure è stata una rimozione fatta per errore ?

Grazie

IlBano
impiaaa (2021-04-21 18:14:18+00:00): Please don't draw a building if a building is already there. Please merge the node to a building you draw instead of leaving the node separate.
impiaaa (2021-04-21 18:19:28+00:00): Reverted with changeset 103358880
jtracey (2021-04-09 16:09:06+00:00): If you don't mind me asking, where are you getting all these addresses from? The postcodes in particular are usually pretty hard to find, and Canada Post is pretty litigious against people/orgs who import them from their DBs or derivatives.
iindigo (2021-04-09 17:04:20+00:00): I manually pull the addresses from City of Kitchener's website from some of their data portals. Not confident enough to try importing data.
Postal codes are tricky - for businesses I use the postal code they report on their website/Facebook. For residential addresses I look up an address on the street using the Canada Post "Find a Postal Code" page. Postal codes are the same for each side of a street/area so it's one or two per street. This page says that it's permitted for "limited" personal/business use, and since I'm only looking up one of the addresses I figured that counted as "limited." But if you know better please let me know and I can not do so in the future. I just started editing a little while ago and it's been a good way to kill time so I'm learning.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
ottwiz (2021-04-09 15:37:52+00:00): The farmlands and some landuses isn't 100% done!! just i'm gonna write a midterm exam so i can't finish it on the fly.
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 19:02:58+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier als Namen "Leeres Schuldgebäude" getaggt. Das hieße so aber, dass die Schule in "Leeres Schulgebäude" umbenannt wurde, was ja unsinnig ist. Die aufgegebene Nutzung von etwas kann man meist mit "disused:..." als prefix von etwas setzen. Hier wäre also "disused:amenity=school" passend. Das Gebäude an sich hat ja keine weiteren tags, daher habe ich das Gelände auf den obigen tag geändert.

Grüße
Hauke
Fabian Hevessy (2021-04-09 15:06:18+00:00): Apparently part of my changeset description was cut. Here's the part that's missing:
This edit was based on in-person observations as well as the following document:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210409150427/http://www.comune.luino.va.it/media/429307/PGT20_OSS_26_MAGAZZINI-GENERALI.pdf
user_5359 (2021-04-10 16:53:01+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
COD_VIA=30151367807
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning(!) of the keys.
If this is a internal, italian reference number please use ref:IT:cod_via
ivanbranco (2021-06-01 15:46:54+00:00): Ciao LuSirto, cosa significa il tag addr:city=#N/D ?
sorcrosc (2021-06-13 02:11:44+00:00): È ovvio che si tratta di un import mal fatto e la cosa più grave è che non si cita la fonte, cosa essenziale per il rispetto di qualsiasi licenza aperta, ammesso che lo sia.
dktue (2021-04-10 11:02:26+00:00): Hey, im Wikimedia-Commons-Tag der Buswendemöglichkeit fehlt noch das "File:"-Prefix im Value. :)
dadavid (2021-04-10 11:10:06+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, 
fixed in osm.org/changeset/102693131
NieWnen (2021-04-09 18:30:27+00:00): Warto napisać co się modyfikuje, a nie ile.
Co do serwisu, można wrzucić "Auto Leo" w nazwę, bo podejrzewam, że o to chodziło, a nie o operatora
wiki operatora: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:operator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102653868
gonnzo (2021-04-12 11:42:55+00:00): Le bâtiment va être remplacé par un autre beaucoup plus grand.
Rainero (2021-04-09 16:12:31+00:00): Hallo steven schindler,
schade, daß du nicht auf CS-Kommentare antwortest, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102502936.

Hier nun leider wieder so ein leisure=park, das keines ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107275002

Daher nochmal meine Bitte um Kommunikation mit anderen, die bei OSM mitarbeiten.

Außerdem beschreib bitte im CS-Kommentar, was darin geändert wurde, damit andere nicht vorher/nachher vergleichen und raten müssen, was wohl die Intention dabei war. "Leichte Änderung" ist einfach nichtssagend.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Luzandro (2021-04-10 04:57:58+00:00): Hi,

tracktype was originally intended for tracks. You can also use it for highway=service, but even better would be surface or even smoothness.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102654290
fdemmer (2021-07-03 11:22:45+00:00): Thank you! I fixed it.
Kovoschiz (2021-04-10 03:48:15+00:00): `highway=corridor` is older, inconsistent with `highway=*` + `indoor=yes`
DD1GJ (2021-04-10 23:21:57+00:00): gelöschten Rettungspunkt AS-2030 wieder hergestellt:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4322776524/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
NieWnen (2021-04-09 18:33:38+00:00): Jest ok.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102655282
Kovoschiz (2021-04-10 03:51:42+00:00): This is a path of exit. It only rejoins the original roadway for a short section.
NieWnen (2021-04-09 18:35:42+00:00): Jest ok.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102655373
ivanbranco (2022-01-07 13:46:48+00:00): Hi CaseyIvanW,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8612028829/history

do you know if this place have a name? If it doesn't we could add noname=yes
mueschel (2021-04-12 13:56:22+00:00): Hi,
you used several keys here that are not used in any other place - what do they mean?

  Karta Łodzianina = yes
  diet:veger = yes
  discount:citycard = yes
  ŁOT = no

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Also, our database in case sensitive, all keys have to be in lower case (with
very few exceptions). Please have a look to the OSM Wiki to find out which tags are in use.