piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
emacsen (2014-11-18 02:30:19+00:00): Has this import gone through the Import Guidelines as per: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_guidelines

I don't see a discussion on the imports list about it.

Tem esta importação atravessou as Diretrizes de importação como por: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_guidelines

Eu não vejo uma discussão sobre a lista de importações sobre o assunto.
lezurdis (2014-11-18 19:20:39+00:00): Their have been some discussion on the talk-pt mailing list, for example here :
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pt/2014-September/000925.html

But no proper "plan of action" as described in the import guidelines.
emacsen (2014-11-18 19:25:13+00:00): I see. That being the case, I think these changesets associated with this import need reverting. It would be best if ViriatoLusitano reverted these changesets.

Can you please agree to do that?
Colaborando en Software Libre (2014-11-18 03:15:03+00:00): Calle Cerro Mesa - Alumine
5m4u9 (2014-11-18 06:43:44+00:00): Carlos,

en esta edición has cometido algunos errores al crear la ruta del bus 270. 

Nunca se debe volver a dibujar vías que ya existen, las relaciones deben seleccionarse una a una a la relación y utilizar el tipo (forward, backward). 

En las rotondas debes partir las vías (circulo perfecto) y sólo seleccionar la parte que forma la ruta y no toda a rotonda.

He corregido lo que pude y creo que ahora está más o menos bien. Revisa la nueva relación aquí => http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4204592 

PD: En JOSM, debes instalar el complemento de relaciones, y otros. Si hay dudas vení al HackLab Cochabamba en el mARTadero y salís de las dudas cuando te explique cómo editar esto.

Gracias por añadir la ruta!!
py_berrard (2017-06-26 06:47:28+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1042496
4rch (2014-11-28 22:11:53+00:00): Hi mogeogis, please use meaningful changeset comments and state out your sources.
Does the coastline represent the condition after the construction is finished?
seav (2014-11-18 22:58:09+00:00): Hi ivet,

Instead of deleting the point, why don't you include the point into the way you are creating? Just move the point to one of the corners then draw the rectangle with the point as one of the corners. Then transfer the tags from the point to the rectangle afterwards.
KristenK (2014-11-19 00:45:31+00:00): (cross-contacted via OSM website messaging service)

Hello,

I just noticed the node (point) representing the location of Philadelphia was deleted in your subject changeset. I am writing to understand why the node was deleted. The node is used for map display by other OSM users and shouldn't have been deleted.

I am assuming the deleting edit was unintended. Since you're a relatively new person (one edit). I would like volunteer and revert the OSM edit for you. As courtesy I wanted to sync up with you beforehand. Hence this message.

Best,

Kristen
KristenK (2014-11-19 18:48:06+00:00): resolved with fellow user. some deduplication activity associated with node 158326597.
seav (2014-11-18 22:43:47+00:00): Hi Aileen,

Instead of deleting the point, why don't you include the point into the way you are creating? Just move the point to one of the corners then draw the rectangle with the point as one of the corners. Then transfer the tags from the point to the rectangle afterwards.
fndoder (2014-11-24 11:06:34+00:00): В теге name должны быть только имена собственные. "Котельная" - не имя собственное. Но, при необходимости, комментарии можно писать в тег descroption. Исправил. Просьба ознакомиться с документацией по тегирования в вики ОСМа.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-03 08:28:53+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313357371 seems to have no tags on it?  Presumably it should be railway=rail?
seav (2014-11-18 22:32:31+00:00): Hi Khym,

Instead of deleting the point, why don't you include the point into the way you are creating? Just move the point to one of the corners then draw the rectangle with the point as one of the corners. Then transfer the tags from the point to the rectangle afterwards.
Khym (2014-11-20 00:32:47+00:00): Hi Eugene,
Thanks for the suggestion.
Do I need to delete the tags of the original node after I transfer the tags to the new polygon?
seav (2014-11-20 23:34:16+00:00): Yes, please delete the tags. :)
Khym (2014-11-21 01:22:17+00:00): Thanks.
There are instances that there are both polygons and nodes on a particular feature. But these polygons do not have the tags the points have. What do we need to do? Copy the tags from the point to the polygon and delete the point after? Or delete the polygon and draw a new one using the point as the initial node? Thanks for the help.
seav (2014-11-22 06:15:30+00:00): In that case (there is both a point and a polygon already existing), just copy the missing tags to the polygon if there are any and then delete the point.

But, personally, I would merge the node into one of the nodes of the polygon so that the creator of the node is still credited in the existing data. This can be done in JOSM by selecting the node, then a node in the polygon and then pressing 'M' (for 'merge').
BushmanK (2014-12-26 01:52:08+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313360112 не требует указания name=
См. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
Totor (2025-02-06 05:05:51+00:00): Hi Manfred,
We are not supposed to add personal information (Family names of inhabitants...) to Openstreetmap.
Please save the locations on a printout or local file, and delete from OSM
manfred_otte (2025-02-06 05:53:18+00:00): Hi Totor,
I have no clue, how to safely delete content from OSM.
Totor (2025-02-06 10:34:35+00:00): Hi Manfred,
In josm, just download the area, select the point, check if the right point is highlighted, and if tags match what you expect. You can from the menu view the history, to see if anybody else edited the point. When sure, press the delete key.
Check if the result is ok and upload...
If in doubt, undo, or close without saving or uploading.
In this case that should be enough.
For other points or ways, you may need to also check if it is not part of a relation.
However if you want me to delete the points, let me know ^_^
SomeoneElse (2014-12-08 22:54:01+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3193341051 could do with a main tag if people are to have a chance of finding it.  Would it be an "office=charity" perhaps?
Nakaner (2014-12-03 21:30:57+00:00): Kannst du mir mal bitte erklären, warum du an folgendem Way auf ganzer Länge service=siding erntfernt hast? Das Gleis ist ein Überholgleis (selber mit eigenen Augen gesehen). http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286359721/history
Nakaner (2014-12-03 21:33:40+00:00): Das von mir genannte Beispiel ist kein Einzelfall. Siehe auch www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/35935125/history Das ist kein Einzelfall und kein Versehen!

Der Änderungssatzkommentar hat auch wirklich gar nichts mit dem Inhalt zu tun.
dieterdreist (2025-10-22 15:50:23+00:00): Mir ist aufgefallen dass hier place=village entfernt wurde: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8048230
cadsauxk (2015-02-06 11:43:09+00:00): Por favor não coloque descrições como "Eucalipto" e "Pinus" no campo "name". Neste campo devem constar somente nomes   próprios como "Floresta Negra" etc.  Sugiro mover isto para o campo "description".
fkv (2021-07-06 22:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 107522997 where the changeset comment is: 26863390 rueckgaengig; es ist absurd, sich bei so einem Edit auf eine Diskussion zu berufen, in der sich nicht mal die Mehrheit dafuer ausgesprochen hat
fkv (2021-07-06 22:29:43+00:00): Sorry, I made a mistake (wrong changeset ID) and already reverted my revert. Keep up your good work. :-)
cadsauxk (2014-11-22 14:15:36+00:00): Qual foi a alteração?
FHBGPS (2014-11-22 15:17:23+00:00): A Rua Maria Barbosa Cerqueira estava com o mesmo nome da Rua Roberto Geraldo de Freitas.
aceman444 (2014-12-11 17:09:42+00:00): Dobry den, tu je asi chybny popis sady zmien. Ziadnu bodovu ste nepridali, skor PSC zonu.
cadsauxk (2014-11-22 14:14:36+00:00): Porque apagou a Rua Mangaratiba?
cadsauxk (2014-11-22 14:22:22+00:00): edição revertida 26952693
FHBGPS (2014-11-22 15:18:41+00:00): Foi excluído apenas o trecho inexistente entre a Rua Copéia e a Avenida Itaituba.
cadsauxk (2014-11-22 17:12:41+00:00): Obrigado pelos esclarecimentos, já desfiz a reversão.
chillly (2014-11-18 13:24:35+00:00): The idea of the housename is to add  the name of the house, not everything. Use name for the business name (as you have), street for the street name, city for the place name and postcode for the postcode.

Usually IT folks try to be too rigorously structured, so this is a surprise :)
aceman444 (2014-12-11 17:13:47+00:00): Dobry den, a date tuto cestu aj do relacie alebo niekde uvediete ake je teda cislo PSC v tejto oblasti? Dakujem.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-03 21:41:07+00:00): I think that it might be worth having a look here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313401113#map=18/55.87926/-4.22511 .  That way overlaps with a siding http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118794897 but doesn't join it.  It's also tracks=2; but I'm guessing that that is redundant now?
Derick Rethans (2014-11-18 13:56:56+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for adding this cafe, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

It is really helpful for fellow mappers to fill in a comment when saving your edits, that way, we know what good things you've added! Please have a look at that for future edits.

cheers,
Derick
Derick Rethans (2014-11-18 13:55:13+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for adding this abbatoir. You have however not assigned a category, could you please add that through the editor?

It is also really helpful for fellow mappers to fill in a comment when saving your edits, that way, we know what good things you've added!

cheers,
Derick
Derick Rethans (2014-11-18 13:52:26+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for adding this shop. You have however not assigned a category (shop type), could you please add that through the editor?

cheers,
Derick
Derick Rethans (2014-11-18 13:52:51+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for adding this funeral service office. You have however not assigned a category (office type), could you please add that through the editor?

cheers,
Derick
Derick Rethans (2014-11-18 13:48:27+00:00): Hi,

I saw that you added a pub. Great! However, you mapped it as a restaurant with as cuisine "pub". But we usually map a "pub" with a specific category, that your editor (iD) also supports.

Beside that, it would be really helpful for others if you supplied a comment when saving your edits!

cheers,
Derick
Derick Rethans (2014-11-18 13:47:11+00:00): Is there a reason why you removed the name of this fast food place? 

It really helps if you fill in a change set comment when you click "save" in iD - then people know what you've been up to!
chillly (2014-11-18 14:20:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

I don't see why you have added garden in Arabic to a point in the recreation ground. 

Any edits you make are shared for everyone to see.
chillly (2014-11-18 14:15:31+00:00): Please don't add junk like this to the map. All that you add is visible to everyone - it's not a private version for you. If you explain what you were trying to do I'll help, if not then I'll remove this.
Derick Rethans (2014-11-18 13:50:28+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for adding address information to this restaurant. Could I please point out that we just tend to store the housenumber in the "addr:housenumber" field, and not in "housename"? Right now, you've also added "E London" to the housename, which is not correct either. If you want to store the city, please use the "city" field.

cheers,
Derick
chillly (2014-11-18 14:18:51+00:00): I don't see the point of adding garden in Arabic to a point in a recreation ground? Is there a garden there? Is there some Arabic feature there, or are you playing without realising your edits would be visible?
Derick Rethans (2014-11-18 13:59:04+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for adding this cinema, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Although you added the name, you did not map this as a "cinema". Can you please edit the feature again, and select the "cinema" category?

It is really helpful for fellow mappers to fill in a comment when saving your edits, that way, we know what good things you've added! Please have a look at that for future edits.

cheers,
Derick
5m4u9 (2014-11-19 05:23:00+00:00): Gracias por seguir añadiendo rutas de bus!.

Arreglé algunas pequeñas fallas en esta y las otras contribuciones. Recuerda que debes romper las vías o rotondas antes de añadir a la relación sino el ruteo estará mal. Luego, el nombre de la ruta debe ir de inicio a fin.
EdLoach (2014-11-18 17:54:15+00:00): I'm not entirely sure what you did in this changeset (you didn't include a changeset comment), but did you mean to call the large grass area Deadham Heath and also mark it as a village? Dedham Heath (the hamlet) is already mapped here: http://osm.org/go/0EHbd3d8
eggie (2020-09-03 20:30:54+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog wel welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
KnMoon (2014-11-18 15:53:47+00:00): 編輯時才發現山西路和陝西路都是Shanxi Rd.，「文心山西路口」和「文心陝西路口」都翻作Wanxi-Shanxi Intersection，沒問題嗎？
tanguero83 (2014-11-18 16:13:42+00:00): Gartenstraße currently double oneway from Invalidenstraße north to Bernauer Straße and south to Tiekstraße due to construction around Nordbahnhof.
tanguero83 (2014-11-18 16:11:34+00:00): Road currently open due to construction.
anderfo (2016-08-23 07:52:03+00:00): Hi,
I've noticed that you've moved many of the roads and houses in the Harbak area, in order to match it with Bing satelite photos. The intention was probably good, but please note that Bing photos are usually offset with everything from 20 meters to several hundred meters! Thus, I would advice you to use Kartverket N50 data (which has been released) instead, in order to correct all the offsets. I started correcting some ways but the correction job takes plenty of time (longer than drawing them in the first place). So it would be better if I stopped the offsets from appearing (or re-appearing)...
It is possible to shift the Bing data so that the offset is removed for a small area, but sadly the offset is variable, for example it depends on the altitude. The satelite photos are not orthorectified. 

Thus, if you remove the offset for one area, the data is completely offset in a different area. Here are some screenshots of similar trouble in Oppdal, although with smaller offsets: http://folk.ntnu.no/anderfo/files/temp/OSM/Bing/

In conclusion: Please stop using Bing as a data source, at least here in Norway, and use instead Kartverket N50 and/or Strava heatmap. If you wonder how to do that, have a look at this simple guide which I made a few weeks ago (in Norwegian): 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Mountain_biking#Redigering_i_JOSM.2C_mini-guide

Please ask me if you need help! (and you may of course write in Norwegian if you prefer that; I don't know whether you're Norwegian or foreigner)

Best regards, 
Anders Fougner 
Trondheim, Norway
Frans S (2018-08-07 17:17:56+00:00): Hello, During my validation scan I noticed that  you often maps your buildings oversized, Please follow the lines of a building precisely.
I notice not squared buildings as well, you map in JOSM I see.  Don't you use the Building tool ? See Plugins.  Very usefull.
cadsauxk (2014-11-22 14:11:44+00:00): Porque estas vias foram apagadas? A via está duplicada e por isto havia sido marcada como trunk no trecho duplicado.
Thundercel (2014-11-23 11:35:23+00:00): Visando corrigir roteamento na região a LMG-806 foi toda revisada dentro do seu traçado e áreas ao redor dela.
Quanto a rodovia duplicada ser Motorway, Trunk, Primary, etc, isso merece debate e na minha opinião levando-se em conta o objetivo da hierarquia que é o roteamento.
cadsauxk (2014-11-23 11:57:56+00:00): Você removeu a parte duplicada baseado em que informação? 

A via está duplicada e está confirmado pelo usuário amauri29 que inseriu esta informação pois ele passou pelo lugar. Eu sei porque eu perguntei para ele.

Sobre a segunda parte da sua resposta, sim concordo que cabe o debate, mas com quem você debateu isto? Você entrou em contato com os usuários que editaram este trecho antes de você?
Thundercel (2014-11-23 12:26:40+00:00): Revisei a rodovia segundo informações recebidas de um morador de Ribeirão das Neves que emprega o mapa COCAR que compilamos e disponibilizamos em nossos sites para GPS.
São tantas informações de correções que recebemos que necessito de tempo para resgatar o utilizador local.
De qualquer forma volto a citar que alteração de hierarquia de via que executo baseia-se no ajuste de roteamento para a área.
Agora me veio uma dúvida quanto ao trecho da rodovia duplicado e que foi por mim alterado para pista simples de sentido duplo.
Que trecho é esse? Quais as coordenadas dele?
Pergunto porque identificado o colaborador que reside em Ribeirão das Neves - MG irei questiona-lo sobre a informação e solicitarei video do trecho.
Thundercel (2014-11-23 16:10:23+00:00): Por gentileza,
pergunte ao amauri29, que diz existir trecho de pista dupla, se ele empregou no osm o mapa do tracksource como referência.
Cito isso porque o mapa tracksource tem alguns trechos dessa via como pista dupla quando não são. São de pista simples, mão dupla.
Infelizmente o desenvolvedor Tracksource do local evita empregar restrição de manobra e prefere empregar duplicação de via com o que eles chamam de viaduto real, que significa a não existencia de nós no entroncamento.
Collectors Cache (2014-11-27 15:55:56+00:00): payment:bitcoin=yes
trigpoint (2014-11-18 18:19:18+00:00): Is the path really signposted "The Back of the Avenue", it sounds more like a description.

The single residential area could be surveyed and split up. There are churches, shops and pubs that I can see which do not belong under landuse=residential
raggedrunner (2014-11-19 20:49:08+00:00): The path name was removed when it was realised this was not just a description, but a map label. Inexperienced user !
cadsauxk (2014-11-22 14:12:31+00:00): Qual foi a correção e porque houve vias apagadas?
Thundercel (2014-11-23 11:37:10+00:00): Criação de um novo viadutoe extinção de uma das linhas férreas com o consequente arruamento diferenciado na área.
derFred (2015-04-24 09:58:13+00:00): Hi Matinadi

in this changeset I saw this node: San Francisco (1242420252)

We are mapping in A Guarda. Nobody knows about  the node as menitoned above. 

What do you think, what we can do? Or you move it to the right place - or we delete it?

Keen to here from you.

derFred
matinadi (2015-04-24 11:43:30+00:00): Hi Der Fred. Sorry but i don't speak English.

El nodo se refiere a una importación que se realizó de los nombres de parajes del Mapa Topográfico Nacional del Instituto Geográfico, no es un población sino el nombre de una zona. (http://www2.ign.es/iberpix/visoriberpix/visorign.html?x=510978.5927&y=4637290.3987&zone=29&r=652&visible=MAPA_MTN25;)

De todos modos, si considerais que el nombre está mal, podeis borrarlo (We can delete it, if we ).
ToniE (2014-11-19 14:13:28+00:00): Hallo Bratananio,

die beiden neuen Relationen 4206728 und 4206728 sind überflüssig.
Es gibt die Bus-Relationen für den 162er bereits, diese sollten erweitert/korrigiert werden - das mache ich heute Abend mal.
Gruß,
Toni
emacsen (2014-11-18 19:34:43+00:00): Welcome to the project! These are some great edits!

One thing you could do to make them even better would be that when you hit Save, to add a little comment about what you did.
Brataan (2014-11-18 19:40:25+00:00): Hausnummer hinzugefügt
trial (2015-10-20 21:26:25+00:00): You seem to have added details on a non existing track / disused track.
Check http://www.sncf-reseau.fr/fr/projets-chantiers-ferroviaires/cartes/carte-interactive-reseau-ferre-francais for the current network (including track not currently open to the traffic)
Nzara (2015-10-21 17:45:48+00:00): Hey,
I was in that area about a year ago. Unfortunatly, I can not remember much details any more. If you have more actual or more precise information, feel free to apply corrections.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-18 20:37:19+00:00): Dlaczego zostało usunięte bocianie gniazdo? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2956204644/history
lezurdis (2014-11-19 13:24:39+00:00): Olá,
Alterei alguns objeto do teu changeset, parece-me que querias indicar que uma parte da rua era de 2 sentidos e que outra parte era de sentido único.
Tinhas desenhado uma rua por cima de outra em vez de dividir a rua em 2 partes e alterar o sentido de cada parte.

Podes ver e emendar se não estiver correto aqui :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98998352
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313459209
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98998273
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313550177
Nakaner (2014-11-28 18:08:05+00:00): Hat es einen besonderen Grund, weshalb du http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224373473/history mit usage=freight getaggt hast? Es gibt bloß usage=main/branch/military/industrial. Dass ein Gleis ein reines Gütergleis ist, wird über railway:traffic_mode=passenger/freight/mixed erfasst. 

Kennst du die JOSM-Objektvorlagen der OpenRailwayMap? Dort ist das alles richtig implementiert.
Nzara (2014-11-30 06:20:56+00:00): usage=freight entspricht der Beschreibung in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways. Es ist schon länger etabliert und gebräuchlicher als railway:traffic_mode=freight.  
Verwendungshäufigkeit: 
usage=freight : 9 471 Mal
railway:traffic_mode=freight : 5 119 Mal
SomeoneElse (2014-11-18 23:12:56+00:00): (continuing the changeset comment)

There are several routes signed down here; a Staffordshire Moorlands Walk is one, the Staffordshire Way is another.  It's not named either of those.
PanamaKate (2014-11-18 23:38:13+00:00): This area is not complete-please continue working on it!  Thanks!
PanamaKate (2014-11-18 23:41:26+00:00): This area is not complete-please continue working on it!  Thanks!
lyctkel (2022-06-28 16:13:24+00:00): Salut Stephixus,
à https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313499282 vous avez cartographié building=rr. Voulez-vous dire building=roof ?
Salutations,
lyctkel
---------------
Hi Stephixus,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313499282 you mapped building=rr. Did you mean building=roof?
Regards,
lyctkel
lezurdis (2014-11-19 12:59:34+00:00): Olá,
Queria dizer-te que alterei alguns objetos deste changeset, por exemplo tirei o POI Parque infantil do nó para colocar-lhe na área e tirei a função Café Restaurante dos nomes porque já sabemos que é um restaurante por causo do amenity=restaurant;
祥子酷酷 (2014-11-19 02:32:41+00:00): 用于测试ID的性能
Supaplex (2014-11-19 09:16:46+00:00): Hi Fosius Luminis
你合併汀州路一段造成公車路線253不正常了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4120936#map=15/25.0311/121.5121
同樣名稱的路會切開是為了畫公車路線，253會轉彎

OpenStreetMap 的大眾運輸地圖
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/25.0314/121.5105&layers=T

我今天稍晚會修好，之後要合併路徑注意一下，因為iD編輯器不會警告公車路線關係被弄亂
mueschel (2019-12-29 13:55:26+00:00): Hi,
could you check this village? Something went wrong with the name tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3195291032
flohoff (2014-11-19 14:10:25+00:00): Hi,
kann es sein das du nicht nur refs angepasst hast sondern auch jede menge topologien von Krezungen inklusive lands, placement etc?

Versuche da gerade schlau aus einigem zu werden.


Flo
mighty_eighty (2014-11-20 11:27:53+00:00): Hi flohoff,

korrekt. Habe größtenteils einige lanes, turn und einige placement Tags hinzugefügt. Hast Du zu einer bestimmten Kreuzung eine Frage oder generell zu den Tags? Habe das im Zuge der aktuelle Wochenaufgabe durchgeführt (siehe http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2014/11/wochenaufgabe-kw4748-fahrspuren-mit-richtungsangabe-erfassen/ ).

Gruß
m_e