piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ZeLonewolf (2020-09-05 17:52:02+00:00): Thanks guys, I think I've got it squared away now!
ZeLonewolf (2020-09-12 00:18:26+00:00): Folks: I've started a wiki page specifically to document Cook County issues.  Please feel free to contribute thiere: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Illinois/Cook_County
literan (2020-09-08 10:26:18+00:00): так-то велодорожку лучше отдельной линией нарисовать. А если она совмещенная с пешеходной - то теги другие будут
nevw (2020-09-04 07:29:46+00:00): Hi, 
you appear to have deleted a building mapped by another mapper though it still appears to exist on the satellite imagery that I used, enclosed another area as a retail building with zero building levels?, though it appears on satellite imagery to be a yard. 
You have also included another node in the middle with no primary tag to describe what you are entering such as shop=car_parts or something more suitable.

I suggest you use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700
or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with more suitable tags.
MattMan32571 (2020-09-04 04:47:35+00:00): I wish you would stop it I have added grass to my neighborhood like 5 times now and you keep deleting it your seriously pissing me off
DUGA (2024-11-23 14:06:39+00:00): Yellow sign is not legal. Do not map.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5311859/history#map=19/39.432262/-76.828026
user_8466505 (2020-09-04 03:45:51+00:00): Nice job! Keep up the good work at Amazon!
Thanks, 
TheAdventurer64
amitbish (2020-09-07 11:00:26+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for the appreciation. Looking forward to contribute more. Happy mapping.

Regards,
amitbish
Robert46798 (2020-09-09 19:26:01+00:00): kein review_requested - Tippfehler
Warin61 (2020-11-09 08:54:23+00:00): When you add an area inside another area that conflicts between the two, that conflict needs to be resolved. Here you have added a scrub area inside a tree area. It cannot be both trees and scrub. 
The tree area can be made into a multipolygon relation and the scrub (and water) area added as an inner to that new relation.
mueschel (2020-09-05 17:11:46+00:00): Hi,\could you explain what a 'walking road' is? This tag is not used in any other place.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844139140

Thanks!
Rohit Khati (2020-09-05 17:38:42+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for the comment. In our local area, walking road is similar to unpaved road. I will make sure to use proper tag now on.
Warm regards.
rab (2020-09-04 18:33:55+00:00): Please chose a more recent project with active validation. No one will fix your crooked and overlapping building footprints here
woodpeck (2020-09-04 07:45:34+00:00): This house already had  a driveway mapped. Now it has two. Why?
akalohri (2020-09-04 05:19:03+00:00): #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
aachso (2020-09-09 14:35:27+00:00): Hello Sjwim, welcome to OSM!

It looks like you meant to connect this path to Schneebergweg, but it's only "floating" above it, with no connection to that road.

See this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7874494845

You can fix this in the iD editor by trying to move the node a tiny bit. It should then snap to the road and change its color from white (unconnected) to grey (connected).

Thanks!
naveenpf (2020-09-22 10:16:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90396046
eggie (2020-09-04 08:14:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
aharvey (2020-09-04 12:43:13+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:note is for other mappers, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description is for end users of the map, What you've placed in note seems better fit for map users to be aware of hence better to use description.
Is "Campground Clearing" really the name, or is it just a description? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
b0ssi (2020-09-14 13:04:44+00:00): Great, thanks for letting me know about note vs. description - that comment was meant for the end-user indeed, I'll correct it.

Re: Name - I didn't remember it had an actual name when I created it but remembered that I've read that it's called "The Jungo" since then, so I'll fix that as well, cheers.
olehz (2020-09-04 09:05:02+00:00): What does it mean "alignment"?! What is the criterion for doing this? YOU IGNORE GPS TRACKS. I'm rolling back your "improvement"
ValleDeLecrin (2020-09-05 15:22:48+00:00): Hi olehz, thanks for pointing out the offset here. I’ve downloaded OSM GPS traces and will offset Maxar to those and make any necessary fixes to my previous alignment.
olehz (2020-09-05 16:43:03+00:00): In mountainous regions, any satellite imagery has significant distortion. Please do not move roads that have already been adjusted using GPS-tracks.

At the moment, Lightcyphers and Apple decided that Maxar is an absolute truth and are making hundreds of bad improvements: road shifts ignoring GPS-tracks or marking bridges/tunnels where they are not exist. Thoughtless fixing of the automatic validator error only increases the fakeness of the map ((
ValleDeLecrin (2020-09-08 18:14:28+00:00): Thanks for letting me know about your concern, I really value the local mappers' edits and will make sure to check the GPS traces for future edits.
skyper (2020-09-04 09:20:49+00:00): Hi limmmoh

Where is the hashtag?
Where is the identification of the company?

Why are you just continuing editing and telling your boss to comply to the Guidelines first?

As I showed you the Guildlines, it should be no problem for you to check, if all points  covered.

skyper
limmmoh (2020-09-07 13:09:30+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for posting your queries. This edit has been reviewed . Since #hashtag  is not part of our system yet this has not been marked as wrong edit. In case of data  issues or road connection issues review team will ask us correct the data. We correct it back within 24 hrs. 

Regards,
limmmoh.
user_5359 (2020-09-05 08:01:09+00:00): Hello! I revert your modification (adding a phone name)
user_5359 (2020-09-04 19:13:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Jo Cassel (2020-09-15 15:35:12+00:00): Mist, hatte mir fest vorgenommen, demnächst die Rundwege 1+2 in Riede anzulegen, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Jo_Cassel/Schlosspark_Riede "ohne Rundwege 1 und 2" - jetzt sehe ich, da ist mir jemand zuvorgekommen ;-) - habe mich mal begnügt, die description-Tags zu ändern...

Grüße Jo
canfe (2020-09-04 12:31:40+00:00): Perché hai mappato delle strade inesistenti??
canfe (2020-09-07 13:37:26+00:00): Chiedo scusa ho confuso una macrorelazione con una strada.
Tutto a posto.
skfd (2020-09-08 10:03:50+00:00): привет! подьездный входы ето entrance=staircase, думаю main ето единственный главный 😊 а вообще красивый мапинг!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90399192
AlexRiabtsev (2020-09-08 11:30:56+00:00): привет, staircase уже исправил. Благодарю!
abakus_uploader (2020-09-04 22:42:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
katpatuka (2022-04-20 06:03:29+00:00): Merhaba Nesim, https://osm.org/way/844176359 civarında ki yerleşim yerinde bütün evler _çalı_ olarak görüntüleniyor - düzeltme imkanın varsa sevinirm :)
Polarbear (2020-11-01 19:13:50+00:00): Fussweg 336921505 böswillig entfernt,
Straßengeometrie verfälscht.
 Fussweg im Luftbild gut erkennbar!
 
Repariert
skquinn (2020-09-05 02:07:55+00:00): I can survey for the presence of a gate next time I'm out here (probably next Tuesday or Wednesday; I work in the general area).
user_8466505 (2020-09-05 03:55:31+00:00): Will you detail it?
majumdea (2020-09-07 12:32:46+00:00): Hi ,
Thanks for the proactive update. Happy to learn from community .Happy mapping !!
Regards,
Majumdea
naveenpf (2020-09-16 03:00:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90400997
user_8466505 (2020-09-04 09:36:03+00:00): Hello UnSpell,
Thank you for adding this place to the map! At OpenStreetMap, we appreciate people like you who add places to the map, especially in detail. Keep it up!

TheAdventurer64
compdude (2021-02-07 06:18:17+00:00): This stretch of US 6 appears to be a super-two (undivided 2 lane road with interchanges). Per agreed-upon consensus in the US community, this can and should be tagged as a trunk road. I know you made this change five months ago, but I just noticed this now. Would appreciate if if you changed it back, thanks!
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:32:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90401838
dieterdreist (2021-11-21 00:19:28+00:00): Salve, ho notato che hai cambiato il percorso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488627565 da footway in pedestrian. Da anni noto che ci sono mappatori a Venezia che eliminano qualsiasi differenziazzione dei percorsi, taggando tutto come pedestrian. Vi chiedo di non farlo, questo percorso come tanti altri non sono strade pedonali, sono percorsi stretti pedonali. In questo caso estremo, non si passa neanche o forse appena con un passeggino, pedestrian non è giusto per questo tipo di percorso.

Ciao,
Martin
dieterdreist (2021-11-21 00:21:18+00:00): Tra altro ne abbiamo già parlato tre anni fa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50453873
Frans S (2020-10-18 10:33:39+00:00): Hello Crazy_mathi .Thanks for validating this task. 
Lots of squaring.!
Please pay also attention on overlapping buildings. 
They will be reported by the validating tool 
They also pops up when you use the inline Map paint style.
I corrected 10 of them
Best regards
crazy_mathi (2020-10-21 00:23:00+00:00): Thanks Frans!
berndw (2020-09-04 19:10:24+00:00): Hallo RWE2

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap
Du hast in diesem Changeset von der von mir erfassten erfassten Fläche die Eigenschaften entfernt, besser wäre gewesen die Fläche korrekt als Wohngebiet, wenn fertig, zu bezeichnen.
Ausserdem hast Du willkürlich place-nodes gesetzt, die aber wohl eher Gebäude sein sollen, oder? 
Über die korrekte Nutzung von place-nodes findest Du etwas in diesem Wikibeitrag
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling
Wäre schön, wenn Du denn lesen würdest ;-)

BTW, Stell bitte vor Änderungen an Wegen und Flächen die Hintergrundbilder auf ESRI um, Taste B drücken in iD, diese Bilder sind besser positioniert.
Für Fragen stehe ich gern zur Verfügung

Weiterhin viel Spaß bei OSM

Bernd
skyper (2020-09-04 11:08:15+00:00): Ground source?
Identification?
Hashtag ?

Please, ask your chef if it is not wise, to stop all mapping action meanwhile, and tell me the answer

Just read the wiki and your own page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_Logistics

When are my questions answered?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Amazon_Logistics

Why did your instructor not tell you?

Why do you break your own rules?
Why does neither your reviewer nor your instructor tell you to comply to the rules?
Please, ask them and tell me the answer.

skyper
vissushm (2020-09-07 13:39:37+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for your response. We are in the final stages of discussion. Once we reach a consensus will update the same by 11/09. 
Regards ,
vissushm
SHARCRASH (2020-09-04 08:33:16+00:00): + new elements
b0ssi (2020-09-04 08:50:25+00:00): Length of comment was limited: Woolwich Wharf is currently undergoing upgrades and Clark Point is being used instead (according to staff, at least by the F8, but assuming by all applicable). I tried to not accidentally drop any relationships while refactoring, please let me know if you notice I did. There were (and still are) a few redundancies, mainly due to: Consolidated vs. dedicated lines (see the big knot in front of Circular Quay), but also, I suspect, due to edits over time not fully replacing obsolete connections/relationships, ending up with a mix of ambiguous and often partial routes (that end in the water!). I might definitely be missing a larger convention that should be used here (which is mainly my question), so please correct me wherever needed, and would be interesting to see if there are thoughts/plans to consolidate which paradigm is used.
b0ssi (2020-09-04 08:57:11+00:00): Another point to consider: The names of most ferry-route map-lines are named after the two wharves they connect. This starts to become ambiguous and confusing when map-lines are shared between ferry-lines. Also, they way they are written (and used) implies direction, while ferries ping-pong along their routes w/out stops changing I believe (def. might be wrong here - please correct if so).
aharvey (2020-09-04 12:46:39+00:00): ping @Maradona11 not sure if you're interested in these changes, you can inspect in osmcha, eg https://osmcha.org/changesets/90403765 plus another change today at https://osmcha.org/changesets/90411239
Maradona11 (2020-09-05 07:06:04+00:00): Hi,
back in 2018 we (TfNSW) mapped the ferry routes/paths based on "relation approach" instead of "single line approach".  More background on this and reasoning: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2018-August/012011.html

Relations have not been mapped correctly for some time.  We plan to update the relations to reflect all ferry services on the harbor very soon.

Regarding naming.  This is a tricky one working with relation approach.  Would really like your thoughts how this can be solved.

Also happy to discuss and questions or concerns you might have regarding  the mapping of the ferry route/paths.
b0ssi (2020-09-14 12:59:49+00:00): Thansk @aharvey and @Maradona11 for your thoughts & input. @Maradona11, I'll leave the ferry lines be if you say you will update the whole network soon.

Re: Names: I agree, it's tricky. Naming atomic sections according to the two immediate wharves they connect could be confusing as it might look like each segment is a separate ferry line that travels only between those to direct neighbor wharves. Using the name of the line won't work if ferry lines are unified into single map-lines (through relations).

If space on the map allows, I would say that having separate, dedicated map-lines per ferry-line (with a single relation each) would make the map clear and unambiguous to read, but it might get very crowded around the central harbor region, defeating the purpose. Nonetheless, that's the format I would argue is superior as you can see which ferry line is going and stopping where, just by looking at the visual map. Any alternative would abstract the representation, taking away this ability. Most important though is to use a consistent approach across the network to be clear and unambiguous.

That's just what comes to my mind thinking about it, which doesn't mean that there might be a better solution though! So please accept this as an idea, but go ahead if you, or anyone in the community has more experience with this or would like to discuss an alternative approach.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 12:21:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406133192/history has shop = agricultural_machinery that was added in this edit
Maybe shop=agrarian agrarian=agricultural_machinery would be better tagging? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=agrarian

Or maybe this shop value should be documented at OSM Wiki?
SHARCRASH (2020-09-04 08:58:10+00:00): + new elements
eggie (2020-09-04 09:54:31+00:00): Dag Steven.. het gebied van je edits is zo groot geworden omdat je een hondenuitlaatveld hebt vastgeplakt aan de landuse=residential van Veenendaal. Beter zo'n vlak loshouden.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90404562

Je voegt weer adressen toe aan gebouwen. Dat is echt niet correct. Gebouwen en adresnodes apart houden. Import Kadaster.
De Calvijnschool was al getagd door mij op de adresnode. Niet dubbeltaggen op het gebouw zelf. 
De namen van het gebouw afhalen en van de adresnodes. De naam op het terrein is voldoende. 
De adresgegevens van het terrein halen bij Aan de basis. Er zijn alleen adresnodes. De naam aan de Basis kan van de adresnode af.. even als de amenity=school. Er is nu een schoolterrein.
Best lastig allemaal die regels binnen OSM.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-04 09:57:09+00:00): Een andere mapper heeft vanalles al aan elkaar geplakt. Laat dat hondenveld maar.
eggie (2020-09-04 10:00:08+00:00): Het is dus steeds een keuze... of de adresnode.. of het gebouw ..of het terrein krijgt de amenity=school + name=.... school
In dit geval het terrein.. dus de dubbele info verwijderen. De adresinfo op de nodes kun je intact laten
Succes
eggie
skyper (2020-09-04 09:06:14+00:00): Hi

How can I see from this changeset that is is one of an employee of Amazon logistics as required by the Guidelines.

Did you read the Guidelines?

skyper
limmmoh (2020-09-07 13:11:28+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your response. Currently our review mechanism doesn’t check for #tag for any CS. For any map related issue, the reviewer/instructor does send it back. We are in the final stages of discussion and will update the same very soon.

Regards,
limmmoh.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:36:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90405036
Polarbear (2020-11-01 19:24:27+00:00): Du hast hier u.a. die Zufahrt zu einem Hammergrundstück so verkürzt, dass es nicht mehr erreichbar ist. 

Repariert.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:59:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90405481
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2020-09-04 11:20:07+00:00): Please don't delete the grass we've added. Bing or ESRI aerial photos are misaligned and outdated here. We use precise aerial photo from the city of Drummondville which 5cm/pixel.
kartler175 (2020-09-08 09:13:32+00:00): If you really want to do such micro mapping then please do not map differnt areas with the same key on the same land area 
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823987916 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823994417 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823989620
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2020-09-08 09:27:38+00:00): The problem is we don't see these problems in the Id editor. These ways are not even multipolygons. What is the problem exactly?
user_2066394 (2020-09-04 09:41:27+00:00): Da sind doch noch Nebengebäude?
Rei9800 (2020-09-04 19:42:16+00:00): Stimmt. Habe ich ergänzt.
skyper (2020-09-04 09:52:23+00:00): Where is the identification of the company visible within the CS?
dyellak (2020-09-07 12:23:43+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for your response. We are in the final stages of discussion. Once we reach a consensus will update the same by 11/09 as communicated in the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. 

Regards,
dyellak.
mavl (2020-09-04 15:36:56+00:00): Добрый вечер. Похоже на ошибку:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844214501
pesec (2020-09-06 14:03:41+00:00): исправлено
eggie (2020-09-04 10:04:51+00:00): Tip... Je voetpad langs de Djept eindigt in het niets. 
Meestal worden trottoirs niet gemapt, maar opgenomen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=right/ left. both of none
Wanneer er een groenstrook is worden trottoirs wel ingetekend.
Goed routeren doet het allemaal niet.. probeer maar eens de straat over te steken. Je krijgt dan omwegen.
Echter consensus over trottoirs is er niet.
MVG,
Eggie
sander314 (2020-09-04 15:58:16+00:00): Hoi Eggie, 
Ik zal tzt dat trottoir weghalen.  Het ging me toch eigenlijk om de verbinding met het fietspad. 
Bedankt voor al je hulp!
Sander
Sovxx (2020-09-14 18:48:00+00:00): Bonjour, je n'arrive pas à voir si c'est ce changeset qui en est à l'origine, mais une partie de la N6 a disparu (!). https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90406678#map=17/48.66614/2.51149
Savez-vous ce qui cloche ? (sinon je remettrai le segment)
Sylvain 🌶 (2020-09-15 14:36:48+00:00): Aucune idée. J'ai ré-ajouté le tronçon manquant.
Merci pour votre retour
mueschel (2020-09-05 14:57:58+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging of these buildings?
Most of them have a tag that looks like a mistake:
ref = City of Melbourne 

And there are other with a tag like this:
ovlhgt_ahd = 7.3
Is this supposed to be 'height'?
MowgliB (2020-09-05 21:26:17+00:00): Thank you for picking this up! I had expected JoSM to catch those when I did validation. I'll jump in and fix.
tastrax (2020-09-09 00:14:31+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
MowgliB (2020-09-09 02:25:17+00:00): Thanks for letting me know, I wasn't sure what I should do with the 1800 numbers.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 00:55:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90407290
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:44:41+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！