piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2022-07-31 20:17:08+00:00): mi sugerencia es de no llamar a un edificio "edificio" sino nada más su nombre. si dicen "nos vemos en el edificio de ingeniería geológica", pues diría yo que el edificio se llame "Ingeniería Geológica". y luego pues por supuesto habrá el nombre oficial.
en otros campus, he visto que los edificios tienen nombre propio, y ofrecen espacio a los institutos, que también tienen nombre propio, y que edificio e instituto hospedado pueden bien tener nombres diferentes.

(según la página wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/YouthMappers_UMSA_Bolivia, iban a tener un mapathon el 27 de julio. habrá pasado algo?)
aTarom (2022-07-12 05:46:16+00:00): Hola, iba a corregir el "starts" a "stars", pero viendo que queda el website del colegio en el hotel
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711603644/history
y al no conocer qué es hotel y qué es colegio prefiero no tocar nada y comunicártelo en este changeset.
Saludos y gracias por editar
dcapillae (2022-07-12 07:24:06+00:00): Corregido. Gracias.
willkmis (2022-07-11 22:28:35+00:00): Hi, it looks like you renamed this residential neighborhood as "Red Zone", did you mean to do that? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/900319284
JeremyDChicago (2022-07-11 22:39:15+00:00): Yes. This was a request by Hollywood Park, a partner of Arrive/Flash. There is an accompanying email to Mapbox explaining these changes.
willkmis (2022-07-11 22:54:04+00:00): So has the residential area (I mean, the walled area along Renaissance Way, Medici Ln, etc.) been demolished? If so, the houses should also be deleted. I'm thinking you might have accidentally marked the existing sub-division as a parking area, but I have not personally been to the location to check.
JeremyDChicago (2022-07-11 23:01:57+00:00): I believe it's called the Red Zone because they don't want people to park there. I don't have any links to provide since all my sources are emails to and from the client; I am doing this for my job. If you have questions I can provide you an email address if you want proof of what I am saying, but I am doing this with an accompanying email to Mapbox.
willkmis (2022-07-11 23:13:48+00:00): On Sofi stadium's website (https://www.sofistadium.com/parking-information/), the Red Zone appears to be on the site of this construction area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893989427, directly south of where you added it, which, again, appears to be a sub-division, not a parking lot. Can you clarify if this is where you meant to put this feature?
JeremyDChicago (2022-07-11 23:18:54+00:00): I think you may be right; that's my bad. We only got screenshots of the area around the venue but only portions, not the whole area so it is easy to miss.
d1sr4n (2022-07-18 17:15:07+00:00): Спасибо за правки
eggie (2025-10-02 08:18:41+00:00): Dag martin, Wanneer je een fietspad verwijderd.. en dat kan zal bicycle=use_sidepath toch aangepast moeten worden?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2025-10-02 08:22:41+00:00): typo verwijdert
Aangepast https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=172737486
eggie (2025-10-02 08:24:45+00:00): Kennelijk niemand opgevallen..  Routeert al drie jaar niet meer :)
emvee (2025-10-03 05:31:47+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Goed gevonden! En bedankt voor het oplossen, ja, dat was duidelijk fout gegaan.

Even gecontroleerd met brouter en nu opgelost voor de fiets. Verder gekeken naar GraphHopper en die is nu ook goed maar gek genoeg OSRM/Vahalla willen helemaal niet de kruising over, fiets/voet/auto, vreemd.

Martin.
eggie (2025-10-03 05:37:22+00:00): Hoi... van alle kanten? Zal straks nog eens kijken .

Groet..
eggie
emvee (2025-10-03 05:49:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=52.380629%2C4.646093%3B52.379729%2C4.646377

Zo had ik ook met mijn fietsroute in Utrecht, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171640716 maar daar was het duidelijk wat er fout was.
emvee (2025-10-03 05:51:40+00:00): Ja, probleem met OSRM/Vahalla lijkt een algemeen probleem te zijn.
emvee (2025-10-03 05:56:37+00:00): Okay, probleem gevonden, dat was een browser problem en is nu opgelost.

OSRM/Vahalla willen niet via de fietspaden, net nog wat bijgewerkt maar dat zal het niet oplossen en is niet zo erg.
eggie (2025-10-03 06:14:27+00:00): Aan de zuidzijde had ik gisteren nog bicycle=use_sidepath toegevoegd. Die ontbrak daar. Wellicht is die update nog niet doorgevoerd. Even van mn mobiel. .. dus nog niet 'echt' gekeken.
user_8101879 (2022-07-19 00:54:04+00:00): Hi,

about your fixme in the relation 175775, I will suggest to you to create 2 boundary=administrative relations, one for Remsenburg, the other for Speonk, as place=hamlet, and add them to this relation as subarea relations (and remove the 2 subarea nodes when you will have created the 2 subarea relations).

Or look at what I have done to this relation (version 13) and if you think the 2 boundary relations are not necessary and my changes are ok for you, just delete the fixme.

My opinion is that the 2 relations is the best solution but do what you want.

Best regards
ke9tv (2022-07-19 01:55:29+00:00): Would need three relations, one for each hamlet, and one for the Census Determined Place (because that's the one with a tabulated population, a FIPS code, and so on.)  I'm happy to leave just the CDP boundary for now.
brainwad (2022-08-26 10:45:18+00:00): Hi, this edit was just wrong. The Langstrasse tunnel has bike lanes now. Please don't answer questions in StreetComplete without visiting in person and checking the current state.
Fred and the Map (2022-08-28 14:53:41+00:00): Hi brainwad, yes, this was indeed a bad edit. I'm sorry. I only noticed this week that the lanes have changed and haven't had the time to fix it here (again), yet. I took this route daily for a long time and was certain that this was the traffic situation here when I made the edit. 
Lesson learned: Things change. I'll _always_ make sure to check the current situation on site before editing. Fortunately, this was only one of at most 10 edits that I made without checking if my knowledge was still up-to-date.
Thank you for fixing it!
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-15 03:24:31+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139895342
user_14547832 (2022-07-16 23:06:57+00:00): This is not how you add a Service road.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-15 03:24:32+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139895342
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
Frans S (2022-08-26 11:31:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random 
Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I'm surprised by the precision with which you mapped.
You follow the shape of the trees over a building partially hidden under trees. Assume that a building usually has a strictly rectangular shape. Extrapolate and map it accordingly. This way you can map a building with 4 or 6 nodes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123493792
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:47:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-15 03:24:33+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139895342
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-15 03:24:34+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139895342
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-15 03:24:35+00:00): Reverted by DWG for vandalism

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139895342
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
Note_Fixer (2022-07-11 23:07:49+00:00): electric poles moved on to private parking lot to match road route.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
user_14547832 (2022-07-16 23:08:41+00:00): It looks like someone has damaged Allen's boundary using Esri's World Imagery.
ovruni (2022-07-11 23:44:20+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han retirado varias etiquetas building sobre vías que tienen esta estructura sin motivo aparente, por lo que he restaurado estas etiquetas.
Saludos
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:02:04+00:00): ok
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2023-08-11 00:48:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139727968 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to creating edits not based on any source but the users phantasy. Vandalism.
mariotomo (2022-07-12 00:02:32+00:00): :+1: next step, learn JOSM. ;-)
Rick Morales (2022-07-12 17:11:10+00:00): Hahaha, yeah I know, but like I said before. I don't like it because it's not easy for me to understand, but the worst part is that it hijacks the control of  the other apps in my computer. All of a sudden to open a simple GPX file I have to do it through JOSM, and I can't find my other apps unless I do a deep search, :-|   BTW, te quería mostrar algo. Te lo mando en otro mensaje.
mariotomo (2022-07-12 18:28:43+00:00): try to install GPS-prune.
mariotomo (2022-07-12 19:41:04+00:00): »it hijacks the control of the other apps in my computer« is that Windows? or do you use your computer?
willkmis (2022-07-12 02:26:25+00:00): Hi, not sure what your source was for this change, but I go through this area frequently and this area is a signed bicycle dismount zone. See also https://ucla.app.box.com/v/UCLA-Bike-Map. I've corrected this way here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123495910.

Best,
Will
Clarke22 (2022-07-12 22:08:59+00:00): OK.  There are contradictory maps on the UCLA website.  See the link at bottom of https://transportation.ucla.edu/getting-to-ucla/bike vs the Bike Map link which is deeper into the website.  Can you post a picture of the dismount zone sign and its location?  The Dismount Zone map was also included in at least two UCLA Transportation blogs this year.  I haven't found any other references to an expansion of the zone.  
 The bike lane on Westwood Plaza is not really an option for most *potential* riders, even with the 20 mph speed limit.  There is too much traffic, especially buses (trucks?) with no physical separation.  And then sharrows in the loop with buses, cars, including constant drivers unfamiliar with the area, dropoffs, uber, etc.  People will stay on the sidewalk when not crowded as they need to, and 100 extra meters of dismount adds up.
willkmis (2022-07-13 02:18:48+00:00): Here is the sign: https://imgur.com/a/Hl2w0A4. It's on a lamppost right next to this bench: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9301030872.
Clarke22 (2022-07-13 03:59:12+00:00): Cool, thanks willkmis
Enock4seth (2022-07-12 21:29:52+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you please clarify how you came up with all these 'ghost' buildings?
Alifo Ruth (2022-10-14 11:27:32+00:00): Sorry it  was a mistake. Thanks for the notice. I would not happen next time
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
SpeedMcCool (2022-07-19 18:02:03+00:00): Hi MissieJ,

The Minnesota Highway Reclassification Project, initiated to bring MN in line with new American trunk highway standards, found that US 12 from the Twin Cities to I 29 in SD is highway=trunk. I'll refer you to the guidance here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Minnesota/Minnesota_highway_classification

Please undo this change by reelevating US 12 to trunk status through western MN and refrain from further changes to the trunk network without consulting the wiki first.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 11:00:41+00:00): reverted
Supaplex (2022-07-13 05:32:02+00:00): Hi NotRedArroyo,

Could you explain what is your edit means? It does not fit any satellite image.

Dennis Raylin Chen
Data Working Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123496059
MxxCon (2022-07-13 19:07:17+00:00): Hello.
Do you know if this business completely shut down or just having problems with their website?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123496223
notnotnotyourfriend (2022-07-13 20:23:00+00:00): I do not.
MxxCon (2022-07-13 19:09:33+00:00): Hello.
Are phone numbers for both of these locations remained the same?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123496361
juliencherry (2022-07-14 03:38:34+00:00): Good question, I visited the delis to get their new phone numbers and updated them
LeifRasmussen (2022-07-12 04:04:22+00:00): You can't tell if these are gone without also looking at terrain data to see if any trace of the changed terrain exists.  Abandoned railroads are very useful to have in OSM, even if the tracks are removed because it's not about the tracks, but about the corridor that still exists and still feels like a railroad corridor.  I use this data a lot and don't like it getting deleted for no apparent reason.
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-12 04:10:40+00:00): There is reason.  And it is apparent.  there are no traces remaining in satellite data or on the ground.

If we are going to go based on terrain data for what we used to be there, are we then going to start mapping former woods, old river paths, long-gone road alignments?  What about all those new land areas that used to be underwater but soil was added and it is now above water?  Would that be "ocean=razed"?

I argue that old road alignments are useful.  It will still feel like a road corridor.

As for the razed woods, idk, housing projects don't feel like woods, anymore than non-existent rails feel like railways.  But I guess we should get started doing all those razed woods, razed meadows, razed roadways, razed buildings and razed trees.
LeifRasmussen (2022-07-12 04:13:27+00:00): OK, I see what you're doing, and I agree with it.  I had experiences in the past with people deleting 10s of miles of abandoned railroads that were still obvious, and thought that was what was going on here.  The segments you are removing are obviously completely gone, and should be removed.
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-12 04:24:16+00:00): Yes, exactly.  Thanks for understanding.  Only the ones that go through houses, buildings, roads etc. where it is clear there is nothing left.

In areas with thick trees where I am not sure, I am leaving the razed railways since it is possible they were left to rot and decay.

I definitely see the value in keeping abandoned rails.  For example, we have some near where I live that are clearly abandoned and have been for decades.  But the rail is mostly there, ties are there, just overgrown. Visible on satellite imagery, and would be useful for SAR or others to know there is are still rails there.
gabro00 (2022-08-13 11:09:26+00:00): Szia! Biztos 50km/h a sebességhatár a híd ezen szakaszán a felújítást követően?
JJIglesias (2022-07-12 04:04:42+00:00): Gracias por hacer la prueba y NO dejar el elemento de prueba creado en el Mapa.
Te enviamos un correo directo con algunos consejos de edicion, si gustas familiarizarte rapidamente te recomendamos visites learnosm.org

Saludos

JJ
literan (2022-07-12 18:18:02+00:00): зачем вы упорно плодите дубли ресторанов?
Wilmer Osario (2022-07-12 12:57:38+00:00): ¿Por qué marca las calles de los barrios con la etiqueta [access=no]?

Siguen siendo calles de acceso público por lo que ésta etiqueta es indebida. Solo se usaría en caso que hubiese alguna barrera física que impida que un vehículo transite por allí, como por ejemplo, un portón.
JesseFTW (2022-07-13 13:42:50+00:00): Thanks for adding these! It's always good to see more power plant info on the map, including links to the EIA codes.
jqngarcia (2022-07-13 09:36:10+00:00): Se ha retirado la información personal, no es conveniente que esté en OSM
John Kastner (2022-07-12 13:27:46+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you clarify a few things about your edit for me? You've added this apartment where there is already an apartment building by a different name mapped. Is there a separate apartment  operating here alongside the previously mapped one?

The name of the apartment also seems like it may be referencing some individual's apartment home. It is generally not acceptable to add this sort of personal information to OpenStreetMap. 

Based on these observations, I intend to delete the apartment node you added. Let me know if I am mistaken about anything.
osmviborg (2022-07-12 05:34:52+00:00): Hej. Undlad venligst at rette i adressepunkterne. Opret gerne separate POI'er.
mittys (2022-07-12 05:40:59+00:00): Hej, det skal jeg nok undlade at gøre.
Beklager
osmviborg (2022-07-12 05:54:30+00:00): Du kan læse mere om håndtering af adressepunkterne her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS
kolasau (2022-07-12 04:46:42+00:00): right tag is #mbx_linters_spain
jonorossi (2022-07-14 11:16:58+00:00): Nice work! Fixing the map by changing the real world.
b-holdet (2022-07-12 05:52:27+00:00): Hej mitty,

Det er ikke så godt at du ændrer i adressepunkterne. De bliver helt automagisk rettet fra AWS, så dine fine ændringer bliver overskrevet.

Du skal hellere oprette apoteket som et separat punkt (POI). Det ska ligge ved adressepunktet, men ikke oven i. Evt. kan du lægge adressedata ind i dit nye POI, så det kan findes af diverse navigationsmidler.
mariotomo (2022-07-12 19:36:37+00:00): thanks! Rick was alerted and advised to fix this, but he's not a JOSM user, so he asked me, and I could not find the errors, since you had already fixed them.
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama/15678
gscholz (2022-07-13 08:46:22+00:00): Thanks for this information Mario,
today I fixed some more details here. A person called "A. Rodriguez" has left his name there and the "drainage_divide" should possible be a relation too:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/611876336/history 

Guido