piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-04-15 11:55:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E: All Rectangular Buildings you mapped are not fair squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular. 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113371937
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:12:42+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-04 18:22:17+00:00): Please check added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:12:53+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:13:02+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:13:12+00:00): Added buildings
user_2066394 (2021-11-22 11:34:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256869467
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256869472
Beide Gebäude haben jetzt die Hausnummer 17
user_12500175 (2021-11-22 13:26:00+00:00): upps , Danke fürs Anmerken habs korrigiert
jleedev (2021-11-04 15:28:43+00:00): So all of these neighbourhoods don't have names?
marczoutendijk (2021-11-05 12:56:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5428

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Erick tamba (2021-11-04 18:17:23+00:00): Buildings added
limes11 (2021-11-04 17:52:28+00:00): Hi, 

likely oneway? Ein hw=secondary mit lanes=2? Was ist das für ein QA-Tool?
Hoffe nicht, dass oneway=no jetzt an alle highways dieser Art getagged wird. Cheers!
skorasaurus (2021-11-04 19:30:41+00:00): thanks for editing although it is still closed until next week according to https://www.ideastream.org/news/clevelands-opportunity-corridor-will-open-to-traffic-next-week
Supaplex (2021-11-05 05:08:10+00:00): 建議不要移除批次匯入的地址，因為是在台灣戶政系統是存在的，如果知道實際位置可微調
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113374800
sammuell (2021-11-16 22:45:38+00:00): Thanks for this. Sylabics aren't used in the Western Arctic (as well as Cam Bay and Kugluktuk), so Latin script is the proper way to render them
Supaplex (2021-11-05 06:17:21+00:00): 如果客家人的聚落應該叫屋吧
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113375474
MatchaHatesGoogle (2022-10-06 09:24:24+00:00): Hi, I've noticed a lot of bad data in imports from your account around my area in Georgia. Do you have a link to where this/these imports have been discussed?
zluuzki (2022-10-06 10:12:30+00:00): The buildings were manually reviewed and thus, the edit dosen't need discussion. The assumption that a lot of the data is bad, is not true. I may have made a mistake here and there, but all in all the quality is very good.
skfd (2021-11-05 13:06:34+00:00): Привет!
Все name:XX теги хорошо бы переносить в old_name:XX, а в идеале в old_name:XX:1950-2021. Иначе Номинатим поиск не сможет искать по истории.

Что бы не фиксить ето все на каждом отрезке можно создавать associatedStreet отношение.

Спасибо!
skfd (2021-11-05 16:10:44+00:00): Еще советую разбивать переименование на несколько чейндж-сетов (для каждой улицы).
CoyKoi (2021-11-05 23:37:03+00:00): Hi skgrange,
This LINZ building outlines dataset is currently being imported through a process documented on this wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/New_Zealand_Buildings
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-18 04:42:30+00:00): مرحبا بك، الصحيح وضع كل اسم حسب اللغة في خانة مستقلة، وقد قمت بهذا التصحيح ومرحبا بك في خريطة الشارع المفتوحة
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-18 04:38:01+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
mueschel (2021-11-06 14:26:44+00:00): Please stop these edits. Google images are not an allowed source for edits in OSM!
omid_kheiry (2021-11-06 18:43:47+00:00): Hello I am changing my resources
omid_kheiry (2021-11-06 19:27:09+00:00): Hi, I no longer use Google images and I use mapbax images
mueschel (2021-11-13 11:23:08+00:00): I reverted this changeset due to the license issues.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-07 18:11:29+00:00): Ciao. Come hai rilevato le dimensioni di questa rotatoria? Avresti dovuto inserire il tag junction=roundabount (che specifica appunto che è una rotatoria), classificarla come highway=primary (dato che tale rotonda fa parte a tutti gli effetti della SS26 che non può avere "buchi" ad una classificazione inferiore) e soprattutto renderla tonda usando l'apposita funzione dell'editor. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113377006
jguddas (2022-01-03 22:24:49+00:00): Hey geohans,
ich kann auf den Bing Satellitenbildern vom 16. November keinen Parkplatz erkennen.
Ist das alles richtig so?

Happy Mapping
Jakob

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3536175190#map=17/52.32739/9.71686
geohans (2022-01-04 19:05:26+00:00): Hallo Jakob,
danke für den Hinweis. Der Parkplatz dort war ein Versehen. Ich habe ihn entfernt. 
Gruß Hans
user_2066394 (2022-01-05 13:04:17+00:00): Der Parkplatz ist versehentlich gewandert:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/3536175190
HedgiePT (2021-12-09 20:16:46+00:00): Viva,

Reparei que, na Linha do Vouga, colocaste um limite de 20 km/h entre Águeda e Sernada e 10 km/h entre Oliveira de Azeméis e Espinho-Vouga.

Isto parece-me ser em erro; da última vez que fui a Sernada (em setembro) a velocidade ainda era de 50 km/h (a sul da estação), e o documento que usas como fonte também indica apenas <= 50 km/h.

Sabes se a realidade no terreno é diferente?

Cumprimentos.
mavl (2021-12-14 16:26:55+00:00): Здравствуйте, AzurRu.  
К сожалению, причина замены тегов санатория осталась непонятной. Комментарий к пакету правок "1" ничего не сообщает полезного. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены полностью или частично.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure%3Dresort  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
ovruni (2021-11-04 22:11:36+00:00): Hola, aquí tambien se ha cambiado un nodo de bus_stop a stop_position en Virú, dejando las etiquetas de bus_stop en el nodo anterior. También se ha eliminado el nodo por Guardia Republicana perdiendose las etiquetas del mismo, por favor primero copiar las etiquetas antes de eliminar el nodo.
Saludos
KirillB (2021-11-05 08:26:32+00:00): For additional info see comment to my Changeset: 113326961 (I described procedure there). I hope that fellow mappers will check the comment first, before they decide to move objects to non-offset maps...

Here I want to add that I made a new offset in the region of Wasbüttel only for the Mapbox satellite map, as there is already existed good offset for Bing (named "Isenbüttel"). I also want to emphasize that new offset for Mapbox and existed for Bing matched very well (positions of the roads, streets and other objects are almost the same) and it gave me some additional confidence for fürther map improvement
streckenkundler (2021-11-04 20:09:56+00:00): Hei,

versuche mal anstelle von Bing besser die Esri-Luftbilder zu verwenden. Bing hat einen extem üblen Versatz. Die Esri-Luftbilder entsprechen hier in Brandenburg denen der offiziellen... 

Im Forum ist das auch gerade Thema...
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74172

Die Daten des LGB dürfen auch direkt genutzt werden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

Für das Einbinden in iD bitte Beitag im Forum betrachten und/oder selbst durchwurschteln... ich persönlich kenne iD nicht.

Die Qualität gibt aber einen echten Mehrwert!


Grüße,

Sven
SekeRob repair (2024-09-07 08:17:13+00:00): Hi,

I'm working on splitting the 330+ member forest MP and came on a strip tagged as shooting range https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/999225263 which goes across an area with buildings on it. Is it a shooting pitch or maybe a cutline area for zip lines.?

Ciao
Taktaal (2024-09-07 08:32:25+00:00): Yeah thats a 300m rifle shooting range with the club house at the south and electronic targets in the north.
SekeRob repair (2024-09-07 15:23:19+00:00): WOW, electronic projectiles certainly won't hurt lest the Eidgenossen have advanced to the star wars weaponry level ;o)

Thanks for the reply.
Taktaal (2024-09-07 15:31:22+00:00): No, the bullets are real, but the targets report the results electronically so it doesn't matter if the targets are located in the middle of the forest. Tom Scott made a video about a similar range once if you're interested https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h1s6S4kotE
philippec (2021-11-28 21:09:07+00:00): Lichtaart Spar aed.
De plaatsing en de beschrijving waren verkeerd.  Ik heb het verbeterd.
bxl-forever (2021-11-04 21:14:52+00:00): Don’t bother too much with address tags: the POI is located within a building which already has an address, therefore it inherits those tags automatically.  People who search for this store would have been given the correct address anyway.
ma-rt-in (2021-11-06 09:43:54+00:00): Hallo,
ich finde es ja gut das due den Mexikoring neugemappt hast, aber warum altes löschen und dann neu machen. Die History ist somit hinüber, zudem war bereits der großteil korrekt nach Hammburg DK5 gemappt und nicht nach luftbild, den durch das Luftbild hast du einen Versatz in den Daten.
Also bitte nutze alle Quellen und nicht nur die eine in Hamburg.

vg
SHARCRASH (2021-11-05 11:23:54+00:00): notes 2601195 2601190 2601191
SHARCRASH (2021-11-05 11:22:22+00:00): Note 2601194
cytryn (2021-11-04 18:59:32+00:00): O co chodzi w tym zestawie zmian?
starsep (2021-11-05 08:35:23+00:00): Czy ma to związek opracowaniem planu miejscowego[0]?
W obecnej formie barrier=yes do wycofania moim zdaniem. Być może do przetagowania z innymi tagami lub zmianę na relację?
[0] https://architektura.um.warszawa.pl/-/jaki-plan-miejscowy-w-otoczeniu-fortu-mokotow-i-wygledowa-czesc%C2%A0i
cytryn (2021-11-06 19:23:29+00:00): Czy takie rzeczy to się w ogóle mapuje? (zakładając, że faktycznie chodzi o mpzp)
starsep (2021-11-07 17:26:41+00:00): Myślę, że teoretycznie możnaby rozważyć mapowanie - aczkolwiek niezbyt widzę jakieś zastosowanie. Na szybko nie znalazłem nic takiego w OSM.
Zrobiłem revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113489487
W obecnej formie zmiana się nie nadaje i tylko wprowadza dezorientację. Być może do przywrócenia jeżeli dowiemy się czego to dokładnie granica i w związku z tym jakie powinno być tagowanie.
aceman444 (2022-09-25 12:51:49+00:00): Zdravim, aj tie semafory na Panonskej ceste na krizovatke s Labutou ulicou ste zistili z Wikipedie (odkial nesmiete nic kopirovat)? A este ani po roku nefunguju (su vypnute), kedze Labutia je stale nepristupna vo vystavbe. A Vy ste ich zadali ako funkcne. Zase zmeny bez rozmyslu a uvedenia legalneho zdroja?
vojtechzaboril (2022-09-25 12:54:47+00:00): Dobrý den, zdrojem semaforů Wikipedia určitě není. Nejspíše jsem to zakreslil z Ortofota. Ale opravdu si nepamatuji všechno co jsem dělal před 7 měsíci.
V
aceman444 (2022-09-25 13:31:21+00:00): No na Orotofoto je vidiet, ze ta Labutia je zablokovana, takze mat tam aktivne semafory by nemalo velmi zmysel. Ak odhadujete existenciu a funkcnost semaforov podla tych par tienov, ktore su na Ortofoto mozno vidiet, neviem ci je to spravny postup.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-07 11:50:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533927825 - czy to na pewno sklep przede wszystkim z alkoholem?

Nie jest to czasem zwykły spożywczy?
Mammi71 (2023-10-23 22:19:55+00:00): Hallo misterXY-BM,

warum hast Du die Tedinginsel und weitere Objekte erst gelöscht und dann wieder neu eingetragen? Löschen und neu Eintragen ist eine nicht gern gesehen Praxis in OSM.
user_1566574 (2021-11-08 15:21:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vos ajouts !

Cependant, attention, vous avez ajouté des objets déjà existants :
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9225082933 → https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90748517
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9225082934/ → https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90750849

Je me charge de la correction.
Merci à vous et bonne semaine ! :)
ralley (2021-12-01 18:25:25+00:00): This changeset added names that appear to be personal.  Do you have evidence of these being the common on the ground names?
aleph_null (2021-12-12 19:47:41+00:00): I think some of the named houses might be holiday homes. Those can be captured with tourism=chalet, right? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dchalet
Neil Richard (2021-12-12 19:59:17+00:00): Cheers for the comments guys,
Not  so much personal names, more local names, by which I mean names that the locals would know these houses/baches by

they are not all tourist baches.

Some of them have formal name signs and some don't

happy to revert the change

I also wanted to mark the lost boat as a point of interest for explorers as it is almost lost and hard to find in the rushes.

I was keen to add some detail to my hometown, but happy to revert the changes if you don't think appropriate
aleph_null (2021-12-18 21:19:54+00:00): If you’re local then you’re a much better authority of how the place should be named then we are :)

If some of the names are directly based on a family’s name that’s living there then it might be better to not map them (mostly for their privacy, but also because they might move away and then the map becomes incorrect). Also, the names should be verifiable: signage is ideal, “common knowledge” can also be OK (if I ask a random local, do they know the name?).
Tomas Straupis (2021-11-04 20:06:43+00:00): Laba diena. O privažiavimą prie pilkapynų/upės paskutiniu metu kaip nors pagerino? Nes kaip jis anksčiau atrodė, niekaip netempia iki highway=unclassified.
krizas (2021-11-05 10:31:33+00:00): Sveiki, praėjusiais metais nužvyravo tą atkarpą, dabar visai neblogai atrodo. Didesnį klausimą kelia atkarpa nuo Mikališkių iki sankryžos prieš Sidaronis, bet kadangi tai pagrindinis kelias link Sidaronių km., siūlyčiau palikti highway=unclassified.
Tomas Straupis (2021-11-05 16:29:46+00:00): Ačiū už info! Na jei nužvyravo iki pilkapių, tai ir iki sankryžos reikia palikti unclassified, vien dėl hierarchijos. Ačiū už info ir sėkmės!
wireguy (2021-11-29 19:39:45+00:00): turn restriction has multiple 'from' values relation 943164
Lee Carré (2021-11-05 10:44:01+00:00): ▪︎Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
▪︎what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments — fixed them how?
▪︎how did you derive cuisine type from Bing? If imagery, I don't see how (and in that case it shouldn't be source but imagery_used), if copying from Bing maps; surely that's a copyright violation?
user_8466505 (2021-11-06 00:12:17+00:00): Hello Lee Carre,

Thanks for reaching out. Regarding the large boundary box and the cuisine type, I was converting cuisine=boba to cuisine=bubble_tea. The reason why Bing is listed as a source is that Bing Imagery was on at the time of the editing. I apologize for the large boundary box and will work on fixing that in future edits.

Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
Lee Carré (2021-11-06 21:49:51+00:00): “Bing Imagery was on at the time of the editing”

Then add the imagery_used changeset key.
danieldegroot2 (2021-11-05 10:04:52+00:00): Hey Fabrizio,

Note, there's bussinesses along here, as well as one gate having access=yes. It is unlikely to be private.
Did you survey this? If so, how is the access signed?

Regards,

Daniel
FabrizioFerrari (2021-11-05 12:51:01+00:00): Hey Daniel, 
I was there and the gate was close. No signs around. But probably you are right is a parking for a gym. 
In this case probably a "permissive" is better choice? 
Sorry I'm still learning how to contribute! 
Regards, Fabrizio
user_3022894 (2023-01-03 18:59:33+00:00): Hi EinKonstanzer,

hier an der Hüttenstraße (Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/999259879) fehlt jetzt den Gleisen aber noch das bridge=yes-Tag, oder?
VG Lukas
EinKonstanzer (2023-01-04 19:31:44+00:00): Hi Lukas, das habe ich im Eifer des Gefechts dann wohl vergessen. Also Ja. Kannst du gerne machen... EinK
user_3022894 (2023-01-07 15:21:35+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die schnelle Antwort!
Danub3 (2021-11-20 11:47:11+00:00): This changeset "spilled" relation 10642520 (natural=wood) on several areas where there should be no forest.
puustain (2021-11-22 14:07:55+00:00): Tuohan on helppo korjata: piirrä alue, jonka et halua "metsittyvän", tagaa se oikeaksi maastotyypiksi ja lisää se multipolygoniin inner-rooliin. Ei se sen vaikeampaa ole...
geoaria (2024-01-02 17:11:05+00:00): تخریب شما در نقشه اصفهان بی حد و وصف است . دست از تخریب نقشه اصفهان بردارید.
ovruni (2021-11-04 22:43:18+00:00): Hola Moises Galvan, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han agregando nombres como descripciones (montaña, mercado, etc), lo cual esta desaconsejado. Los nombres solamente deben de ir en objetos que tengan uno en particular. Tambien el uso de la etiqueta building se encuentra destinado solamente a edificios individuales y en caso que considere que un objeto pueda coregirse como una calle, mueva los elementos, no los elimine para crear otro en su lugar. Para cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad 
Saludos
ovruni (2021-11-04 23:30:17+00:00): El canal de telegram de la comunidad es https://t.me/osmpe . Información sobre los nombres como descripciones las puede revisar en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones , además los nombres van con mayuscula solamente en la primera letra de cada palabra https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may.C3.BAsculas
Sobre la etiqueta de edificios puede encontrar en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
Saludos
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-11-08 11:49:12+00:00): Remember to review all proposed edits - https://osm.wikidata.link/ has several known cases where it proposes to add invalid matches (see https://github.com/EdwardBetts/osm-wikidata/issues )
kjon (2021-11-14 09:51:39+00:00): thanks for your reminder. I think these changes are fine.
felipeeugenio (2021-11-04 23:12:07+00:00): Impecable. Me caben un par de dudas respecto de si usar el tag name en los edificios, pero quedó bastante bueno.
Ese natural=rock qué es? dudo que haya una piedra gigante ahí. Qué quisiste decir?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113386172
BlogCraft (2021-11-05 00:39:29+00:00): Efectivamente hay una piedra gigante en esa esquina del condominio, mide casi 3 pisos de altura. De ahí el nombre del condominio.

Con la vista 3D de Google Maps se alcanzan a ver las dimensiones.
https://www.google.com/maps/@-33.3646445,-70.4947411,38a,35y,180h,39.26t/data=!3m1!1e3

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2021-11-05 00:46:36+00:00): ok. saludos
Strubbl (2021-11-04 21:12:36+00:00): siehe https://sz.de/1.5453454
literan (2021-11-05 17:08:46+00:00): кавычки в имени лишние
ovruni (2021-11-04 22:26:38+00:00): Hola Ovniruna, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha eliminado una vía sin motivo aparente. Previamente esta vía había sido eliminada por el usuario Moises Mollenido también sin motivo aparente en el conjunto de cambios 113369966.
Saludos
fabiotofy (2021-11-05 07:07:18+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto! Sarebbe interessante capire se anche il resto della numerazione civica per Via Ronchiate è corretta oppure no. Vedo che vicino al tuo civico 21 vi è ora un 9/4... probabilmente sarà da correggere. Grazie e buon divertimento!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113386966
Ridolfo Paolo (2021-11-05 07:49:56+00:00): Certamente, posso verificare la numerazione di tutta la via.
Supaplex (2021-11-06 03:02:31+00:00): 請問為什麼要刪除行政邊界呢?除了動到六個里之外，還有中山區、大同區以及兩個立法委員選區邊界
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113387519
Tesla (2021-11-05 07:18:51+00:00): Продолжаете копировать названия улиц из закрытых источников? Я не верю что вы рассмотрели название улицы Шкільна на спутниковой съемке.
Cartographos (2021-11-05 22:20:22+00:00): Κυρία Βαρβεράκη, κατά τις αλλαγές σας χαλάσατε έναν δρόμο στο ύψος της Ακαδημίας. Καταλαβαίνω ότι δεν έγινε επίτηδες και σας καλωσορίζω στην χαρτογραφική μας κοινότητα, αλλά σας παρακαλώ να είστε πολύ προσεκτική την επόμενη φορά. Αν χρειαστείτε κάτι, μην διστάσετε να επικοινωνήσετε μαζί μου.
◪ Jarv (2021-11-05 19:20:58+00:00): Hi Florent,
This edit appears okay to me.
the access=no is only really the one that matters here, with the additional note.
Florent Delannoy (2021-11-06 10:09:01+00:00): Thanks Thomas!
Glassman (2021-11-05 02:33:47+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Sorry about getting the drive though lanes backwards. And I spend a lot of time stopping for coffee!

BTW - you can also add your website if you have one. Always good to get hits on it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113387896
skyper (2021-11-06 12:13:02+00:00): Hallo MaHuReute
Willkommen bei OSM
An der Hauptstraße war noch die nächtliche Geschwindigkeit mit `maxspeed:conditional=*` eingetragen. Leider zeigt iD diesen Tag nicht mit Feldern an sondern nur in der Liste aller Merkmale.
Habe es mal entfernt.
Grüße skyper
Georgesy (2021-11-06 14:32:06+00:00): Danke
ovruni (2021-11-04 23:25:27+00:00): Hola, en sus conjuntos de cambios ha colocado información que no se relaciona a los cambios realizados, por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
cserpell (2021-11-05 18:13:26+00:00): ¿Pavimentaron toda esta calle?
BraixenAxl (2021-11-05 18:39:01+00:00): Sip, hace poco terminaron. Pavimentaron por la construcción del condominio Raíces de Quilpue
cserpell (2021-11-05 18:43:07+00:00): ¡Muchas gracias por la información y los aportes!

Hace un tiempo te escribí por si querías unirte a los canales de comunicación de la comunidad (telegram / lista de correos / facebook).

Saludos,
Ropino (2024-01-04 14:39:43+00:00): Hi,
was für eine Art Straße soll das sein?
construction=highway 
highway=construction
Jetzt hat ein StreetComplete-Nutzer diese für "fertig gestellt" erklärt und nun haben wir:
"highway=highway"
Das macht nicht wirklich Sinn.
VG
steamtrain25 (2024-01-04 14:48:43+00:00): Wie man hier (https://www.gateway-gardens.de/assets/img/pages/lage/1.svg)sieht, soll dort eine Kurve zur B 43 gebaut werden, wieso ich damals Highway genommen habe, weiß ich ehrlich gesagt nicht mehr. Die ersten 30 Meter(?) der Straße inkl. zukünftiger Bushaltestelle wurden bereits fertiggestellt. Daher hatte ich die Straße als in Bau angegeben. War allerdings jetzt schon länger nicht mehr dort, den aktuellen Stand kenne ich nicht.
Rilack (2021-11-04 23:01:25+00:00): BMEEOFTAMM1 - SNP5U6
Tomas Straupis (2021-11-05 07:11:42+00:00): Nereikia klausyti JOKIŲ iD patarimų „taisyti pasenusį“ žymėjimą. Dabartinis žymėjimas yra geras, iD siūlo neteisingą žymėjimą.
ovruni (2021-11-04 23:33:53+00:00): Hola, por favor de persistir con este tipo de ediciones que pueden ser consideradas como un acto de vandalismo. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Vandalismo
neuhausr (2021-11-05 16:53:18+00:00): Hi, I noticed you removed the periods from a bunch of things near U.S. Bank Stadium. This seems to be an error according to local sources. For example, Metro Transit includes the periods in the light rail stop name online:  https://www.metrotransit.org/imap/0/56330  And on the U.S. Bank Stadium's media page, it includes the periods: https://www.usbankstadium.com/connect-with-us/media-information  Would appreciate if you can fix these please. Thanks!
iandees (2021-11-05 19:44:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113424219
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-11-05 03:01:08+00:00): edição revertida