piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-10-09 10:48:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key 11 out of 53 mappings are not properly squared.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127222347
Frans S (2022-10-09 10:53:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
You did not tag  the building and the road.
I added them.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127222563
maciek-szn (2022-10-08 22:27:17+00:00): Wycofane ze względu na uszkodzoną geometrię drogi.
Frans S (2022-10-09 10:43:55+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. 6 out of 20 mapped buildings are not properly squared.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127222702
andergrin (2022-11-29 22:38:06+00:00): Добрий день. У нас немає ніяких свердлових. Видалено
Frans S (2022-10-09 10:42:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key.  100 out of 139 mapped buildings are not squared !
* Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127223324
jeverling (2022-10-09 13:06:08+00:00): Hi Fran, I appreciate your feedback! I'm sorry that my contributions didn't match the quality standards.
Just as an explanation, I made a lot of use of the Q key to make shapes rectangular, but when that resulted in the shape not matching the outline I saw on the imagery anymore I adjusted one or two edges to match what I was seeing more closely. In the future, I will put more emphasis on creating rectangular shapes over them matching the visible outline more perfectly.
Thank you for the link to the document, I will make sure to review it.

Thanks again and have a great rest of your Sunday!

Jesaja
SomeoneElse (2022-10-09 11:51:23+00:00): (all ones that I'd mapped)
Frans S (2022-10-09 10:38:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127223385
eggie (2022-10-09 07:15:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...   Je tagging van natural=wetland .. wetland	uitkijkheuvel heb ik omgezet naar 
tourism=viewpoint
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2022-10-09 10:14:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings in general well mapped but not squared.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127223905
SomeoneElse (2022-10-08 22:59:48+00:00): From survey 18/09/2022, tr9225b
Frans S (2022-10-09 09:40:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 

I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* The shadow of a building included in your mapping.
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127224104
ynnef (2022-10-10 22:57:05+00:00): I apologize for any difficulty this may have caused. This was among my first contributions, and I appreciate the honest feedback.
Frans S (2022-10-11 08:18:09+00:00): No Problem. It is important that the mappings are accurate. When we don't review new mappers work, we can expect many more "bad" mappings which has to be corrected.
A last point.
 Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping.
Ewen Hill (2022-10-08 23:21:42+00:00): Sources: 
Rail
https://twitter.com/DemeryUK/status/1578789556337643521?s=20&t=nfGoSCE_A1soVrbfQ8De1A 
Road:
https://twitter.com/OAlexanderDK/status/1578751246391185408?s=20&t=OKIz9q3XMvhNSeGutOrXHA
ika-chan! (2022-10-09 01:53:27+00:00): Hopefully, Maxar will provide imagery showing the points where the contraflow transition points.
CurlingMan13 (2024-02-05 02:52:18+00:00): You made a couple mistakes:

1) Do not partially overlap landcovers.

2) Do not leave slivers of areas to create "holes".

You should review the following webpage:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#:~:text=the%20building%20itself.-,Common%20mapping%20pitfalls,-Adding%20name%3D*

I have fixed this one time for you.  Please do not continue to submit changesets with these errors.
user_5359 (2022-10-10 06:47:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1102241529. Did this building two entries with different housenumber or is one new and one old?
cgsm (2022-10-14 08:05:58+00:00): For information on this, see http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73869
Frans S (2022-10-09 09:36:11+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
I reviewed 2 changesets.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127225706
Frans S (2022-10-11 09:15:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127225870
Frans S (2022-10-11 09:21:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
 Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. The majority of your mappings are not squared.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127226055
nevw (2022-10-09 11:26:04+00:00): Hi, the relation is not constructed properly here   
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.76921&lat=-27.09923&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways   
You may need to review how relations are formed on the osm wiki.
nevw (2022-10-10 02:53:28+00:00): A closer view
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.27068&lat=-27.52723&zoom=16
nevw (2022-10-10 07:54:35+00:00): this area is fixed
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-09 10:10:26+00:00): Hi!
Is there a reason you changed Brooker Creek Preserve to a park in this changeset? The original nature reserve tagging seems more appropriate.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 09:17:53+00:00): Czyli https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102250540 jest jednokierunkowa dla rowerów?
edc22 (2022-10-12 22:29:29+00:00): Oznaczyłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102250540 jako jednokierunkową dla rowerów ponieważ tuż obok zdecydowałem się oznaczyć osobno wyodrębniony odcinek ścieżki rowerowej jako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102250541 który również oznaczyłem jako jednokierunkowy (w przeciwnym kierunku). 
Geometria tych ścieżek rowerowych (wjazd z jednokierunkowej ścieżki na Dietla) mocno sugeruje, że właśnie w taki sposób odbywa się tam ruch rowerów.
To skrzyżowanie widać tutaj: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1072219593427784&lat=50.05218333333298&lng=19.942333333332954&z=19.62007021014196&focus=photo
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-12 23:14:47+00:00): dzięki za odpowiedź i link!

patrząc na https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=468188538559663&lat=50.052316666667&lng=19.942483333333&z=17&focus=photo to jest to pas rowerowy, a nie wydzielona droga dla rowerów, bez fizycznego oddzielenia (tylko farba)

bym jako kontrapas zaznaczył
edc22 (2022-10-13 21:31:33+00:00): Owszem, nie ma fizycznego oddzielenia pasa rowerowego od drogi. 
Natomiast ciężko mi było uznać, że droga i pas rowerowy tutaj są do siebie równoległe.
(zapis "jeśli biegną równolegle" w https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:cycleway )
Pas rowerowy znacznie tutaj zakręca więc uznałem, że jego zmapowanie osobno korzystnie wpłynęło na odzwierciedlenie geometrii ruchu w skali mikromappingu.
AkuAnakTimur (2022-10-09 01:59:34+00:00): ends near https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=5.635837~101.689877&lvl=17&dir=75.374&style=x&v=2&sV=1
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-13 09:20:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Just a remark. You changes the course of a road around a building, when the road should go straight.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127227896
user_5359 (2022-10-10 10:34:48+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10086084248. What is the meaning of the tags 
ADD_LOC = Y
CIV_NUM = 8873
STR_TYPE = Road
?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-10-11 01:43:44+00:00): Fixed
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
KonyPL (2022-10-11 10:32:57+00:00): Cześć, dlaczego usunąłeś obszar ulicy? Ja go trochę poprawiłem, ale był już wcześniej zaznaczony. Czy to niezgodne z konwencją? Moze w takim razie należy przynajmniej zaznaczyć parkingi?
B_KSL (2022-10-11 11:26:49+00:00): Której konkretnie ulicy (numer)? Tym zestawem raczej żadnego obszaru nie usuwałem. Istnieją dla obu objętych zestawem dróg
KonyPL (2022-10-11 12:17:12+00:00): Kaliska 81 Chociaż jak wejdę w edycję to widzę, że jest ten obszar. Nie widzę go tylko w widoku mapy hmm... On powinien być widoczny?