piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
KartoGrapHiti (2022-03-21 15:31:50+00:00): Es gibt die vorgezogenen Linien die rechts von der Fahrbahn liegen und die nicht nach links aufgeweitet sind, sondern nur die Breite eines Radstreifens haben:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=378938120557047
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1218120495308574

Und es gibt die Linien, die vor der Linie des Autoverkehrs liegen, also auch nach links aufgeweitet sind, so dass sich Linksabbieger, aber auch Geradeausfahrer dort frontal vor den Autos aufstellen können (ARAS):
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=359218596035271
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=476605293426923

cycleway=asl beinhaltet beide Typen (ARAS und Nicht-ARAS).
KartoGrapHiti (2022-03-21 15:33:29+00:00): Ich sehe aber gerade, dass ich irgendwann übergegangen bin, ARAS als cycleway=asl + asl=aras einzutragen. Das erscheint mir tatsächlich sinnvoller. Ich ändere das.
mueschel (2022-03-21 16:25:30+00:00): Hm, deine ersten Beispiele würde ich nicht als asl erfassen. Solche verschobenen Haltelinien gibt es ja auch sehr häufig bei "normalen" Spuren, z.B. um Platz für Abbieger zu schaffen.
iandees (2019-11-15 13:24:26+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77128568
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76757434
iandees (2019-11-15 13:28:33+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77128786
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76757802
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
parsd51 (2019-11-07 15:49:57+00:00): Hej osmviborg

Såvidt jeg ved er parkeringvejene under layer 1 bygningen (og ud derfra) der stadig.
Brownfieldet (IKEAs gamle lager) skulle være åben p-plads og være åbnet i sommer. Jeg checker det næste gang jeg kommer forbi.

Hilsen 
parsd51
osmviborg (2019-11-07 16:07:58+00:00): Lidt svært at vide at det også er et P-hus. Det bør angives på en eller anden måde, en note f.eks.
parsd51 (2019-11-07 16:16:28+00:00): Ja, det er ikke nemt at se. Det eneste er at bygningen er tagget layer 1, så en note lyder fint.
osmviborg (2019-11-07 16:19:20+00:00): Jeg har ændret brownfield til parkering og angivet indgangene til p-huset. P-pladsen kan ses på skråfotos.
parsd51 (2019-11-07 16:22:54+00:00): Det lyder fint. Jeg synes også vejene under bygningen skal være der, nogle af dem er gennemkørsel til p-pladsen bagved.
osmviborg (2019-11-07 16:28:59+00:00): Har lavet en tunnel gennem bygningen og tilføjet en note. Hvis der skal ændres mere på det, så bliver det dig :-)
parsd51 (2019-11-07 17:21:45+00:00): P-pladsen nordpå var også forbundet. 
Hvorfor genskaber du ikke, det af dig slettede vejnet under bygningen?
Jeg antager det var fint som det var. Jeg kunne ikke umiddelbart se nogen fejl ved det.
osmviborg (2019-11-07 18:30:10+00:00): Det er præcis den nordlige jeg har lavet som en tunnel. Den sydlige gik gennem den nu åbne p-plads.
parsd51 (2019-11-07 18:42:39+00:00): Der var også en gennemføring til p-pladsen på Hagedornsvej siden. Det er derfor jeg spørger hvorfor du ikke genskaber, det af dig slettede vejnet under hele bygningen?
osmviborg (2019-11-07 19:02:42+00:00): Værsgo.
parsd51 (2019-11-07 19:15:47+00:00): Det er ikke mig der har slettet et eksisterende vejnet, som nogen har brugt tid på.
pangoSE (2019-11-09 13:04:26+00:00): Hej. Jeg synes det er en god tommelregel at være vældigt forsigtig med revert-funktionen. Har nogen slettet noget som kunne have forbedrets i stedet så er det ikke altid så let at genskabe som fx på wikipedia. 
Jeg ønsker at du osmviborg med din anseelige osm erfaring at dømme efter dit antal redigeringer anstrenger for at imødekomme parsd51s ønsken. (jeg har ikke kigget på ændringshistorikken overhovedet for øvrigt).
Nogen reaktion på det?
mvh
pangoSE
osmviborg (2019-11-09 14:15:09+00:00): Jeg agter ikke at genskabe noget der ikke var korrekt tegnet. Hvis der skal tegnes vejnet indenfor bygninger så må wiki'en følges https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging
parsd51 (2019-11-10 21:25:07+00:00): Hvorfor skriver du ikke det og hvori det forkerte består, når jeg spørger?
Det var såvidt jeg kan se tegnet rigtigt, jeg antager du mener tagingen.

Det er for mig ikke inden i en bygning, det er åbent, så jeg ser det mere som en surface (parking=surface) under bygningen. Bygningen er layer 1, der er ikke bygning på layer 0, OSM mæssigt set. En tunnel=building_passage er hvor der er vægge (evt. forretninger/beboelse) på hver side i samme niveau som gennemkørslen. Det er ikke casen her. Se evt. wiki.

For mig tilføres der meget værdi med vejene under bygningen, idet det kan være svært at finde rundt og komme rigtigt ud ad de mange veje ved navigering. Det er væk nu.

For mig kan der godt sættes level på, jeg synes bare det er overkill ifht situationen, med mindre der mappes rutning på 1. sal. I øvrigt er Jysk stadig i den del af bygningen der vender mod IKEA.

Jeg vil gerne at det bliver diskuteret, så vi finder den bedste og mest afbalancerede løsning. Der kan gøres en masse for at afspejle virkeligheden, men genskabe den kan ikke lade sig gøre, det forbliver en model, så jeg synes det skal gøres så simpelt som muligt. For mig ville det være bedst med et fælles grundlag, så alle har samme lokale kendskab, det kan bare ikke lade sig gøre.
user_5359 (2019-11-07 18:30:57+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wieso hast zur Straße auf der ganzen Länge eine Flußüberquerung eingetragen? Habt Ihr ein Wasserrohrbruch?
gendy54 (2019-12-09 21:51:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Le tag n'était pas adapté. Il s'agit d'une place piétionne. 
J'en ai profité pour l'embellir un peu ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76759080
DressyPear4 (2019-11-07 16:21:33+00:00): Olá, evite grudar áreas com vias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76759587
trigpoint (2019-11-11 12:46:19+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.

This is not a public residential road, but a private driveway. Please could you correct it.

Cheers Phil
ansukess (2019-11-12 06:35:11+00:00): Hi trigpoint,

Thanks for looking into my edit. It was an honest mistake. Made the necessary changes .please refer change set (76941589).Please let me know if any further changes are to be made, Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
ansukess.
DressyPear4 (2019-11-07 16:15:36+00:00): Olá, "square=praça" "pokemon" são tags inválidas, e se o local não pussuir numero, deixe em branco mesmo, "s/n°" está errado.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76761055
The Controller13 (2019-11-07 14:24:06+00:00): ဈေးတံတားသစ်၊ မြေပုံတွင်မပါသေးသည့် ၂၀၁၉ခုနှစ်အတွင်းက ဆောက်လုပ်ပြီးစီးခဲ့သည့် ပြည်တော်သာရပ်ကွက်နှင့် လှည်းကူးဈေးအားဆက်သွယ်ထားသည့် ငမိုးရိပ်ချောင်းကူးတံတားသစ်အားထည့်သွင်းပါသည်၊ ကြိုတင်အားဖြည့်ကွန်ကရစ်အမျိုးအစား ကားသွားလမ်းနှစ်လမ်းပါရျိသည်။ ကုန်တင်ကားကြီးများမှအပ ကားငယ်များဖြတ်သန်းသွားလာနိုင်ပါသည်။
The Controller13 (2019-11-07 14:29:08+00:00): ပြည်တော်သာ(၆)လမ်းအမည်နှင့် အချက်အလက်များထည့်သွင်းပါသည်။
viloan (2019-11-07 14:44:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
nevw (2019-11-08 04:16:30+00:00): You appear to not have a physical presence at the location you have mapped your business to. I have not been able to confirm your physical address details. Please add these to your listing and place your business at that location.
user_5359 (2019-11-07 17:18:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! We write the names of the objects with mixcased Letters. Short question: All of your nodes with Uppercase names are declared as shop = catalogue. Also the Subway (normally a amenity=fast_food). Can you please check this?
The Controller13 (2019-11-07 14:49:47+00:00): လမ်းနှစ်ခုပြတ်တောက်နေသည့်နေရာအား ဆက်သွယ်ခြင်း၊ လမ်းအမည်နှင့်အချက်အလက်များ ထပ်မံထည့်သွင်းပေးခြင်းတို့ပြုလုပ်ပါသည်။
The Controller13 (2019-11-07 14:54:20+00:00): ပြည်တော်သာ(၈)လမ်းအမည်နှင့် အချက်အလက်များ ထပ်မံထည့်သွင်းပါသည်။
The Controller13 (2019-11-07 14:57:57+00:00): ပြည်တော်သာ(၉)လမ်းအမည်နှင့် အချက်အလက်များ ထပ်မံထည့်သွင်းပါသည်။
kreuzschnabel (2019-11-07 18:45:05+00:00): Congratulations – you just shifted parts of London by 3352.6 km to the East all across Europe :)
Richard (2019-11-07 18:51:49+00:00): I suggest maybe using a proper editor like iD instead of JOSM which is well-known for breaking data like this

<runs away very very fast>
kreuzschnabel (2019-11-07 18:54:41+00:00): The nodes shifted coincide with the corners of newly mapped buildings. This looks like a faulty mechanical edit or something like this to me.
kreuzschnabel (2019-11-07 18:55:06+00:00): Viewed in an improper editor: [url=https://ibb.co/Rb8Ztrt][img]https://i.ibb.co/Rb8Ztrt/Screenshot-20191107-194840.png[/img][/url]
maxbe (2019-11-07 18:55:10+00:00): and parts of Oslo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6228745
kreuzschnabel (2019-11-07 18:55:46+00:00): sorry: https://ibb.co/Rb8Ztrt
kreuzschnabel (2019-11-07 19:02:05+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76773501
Richard (2019-11-07 19:03:04+00:00): Thanks \o/
freebeer (2019-11-10 09:27:46+00:00): this changeset (that i missed at the time, due to Having A Real Life™, whatever that is) is being discussed elsewhere, and what caught my eye is:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/108172/history

this shows an old node, long since deleted, and improperly brought back from the dead with this changeset.

i've also seen this behaviour with an improbable number of changesets in iran that recycle deleted nodes, adding rubbish tags such as gamification.  i have not kept track of all these, but my recent memory is they appear to be from a legit version of josm, whether faked or from a malware plugin.  i seem to remember analysing earlier gamification instances claiming to be from the bogus josm 1.6, but my dementia appears to be growing exponentially every day i awaken.

i just thought i'd mention this.  no real reason.  carry on.
kreuzschnabel (2019-11-10 12:49:30+00:00): If only Юрий Семенович could tell us what exactly has been done in JOSM within this changeset (plugins used etc.), the culprit could be hunted down.
maxbe (2019-11-10 13:15:01+00:00): perhaps we need a translator to ask him...
The Controller13 (2019-11-07 15:00:58+00:00): ပြည်တော်သာ(၁၀)လမ်းအမည်နှင့် အချက်အလက်များထပ်မံထည့်သွင်းပါသည်။
DressyPear4 (2019-11-07 16:10:10+00:00): Esses são os nomes das vias?
Outro detalhe é que nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76764608
DD1GJ (2019-11-07 19:55:53+00:00): Hallo Engin, herzlich willkommen bei OSM. Es ist schön, dass sich die Landesstelle für Straßentechnik entschlossen hat, die Umleitungsstrecken anhand der amtlichen Daten zu pflegen.

Ein kleiner Verbesserungsvorschlag: Nimm zukünftig die bearbeitete Umleitungsstrecke in den Änderungssatzkommentar mit auf, also z.B. "Anpassung U 23 (A 8) gemäß offiziellem Verlauf #LSTBW", dann ergibt sich ein besserer Überblick.

Ergänze Deine Benutzerseite https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/LSTBW%20Engin%20%C3%96zlem bitte noch um den Hinweis, dass es sich um einen dienstlichen Account der Landesstelle für Straßentechnik Baden-Württemberg handelt. Nicht jeder kennt das Kürzel LSTBW.

Viel Spaß mit OSM und viele Grüße
Joachim
The Controller13 (2019-11-07 15:23:22+00:00): ပြည်တော်သာ(၁၁)လမ်းအားထပ်မံထည့်သွင်းခြင်း၊ အမည်နှင့်အချက်အလက်များဖြည့်စွတ်ခြင်း၊ ဈေးတံတားသစ်နှင့်ဆက်သွယ်ခြင်းတို့ပြုလုပ်ပါသည်။
hackthemap (2019-11-11 23:05:54+00:00): Hi lukfunk :)

Thanks for your many contributions to osm!

In this and maybe in other changesets you tagged a cyclelane as an own way. This is not right and difficult for routers to interpret. It also doesn't capture that it is not an extra track but a lane on the road. If there is no curb or seperation between the cycle lane and the main road, it should be tagged as an attribute of the road, as one can switch to the main road any time and make a turn for example.
When not to use highway=cycleway: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#When_not_to_use

How to tag cycle lanes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Also, could you tell me which imagery you used? I'm interested in using it, too and if it can be freely used for osm? :)

If you have any questions, feel free to answer here or per direct message!

hackthemap
dx125 (2019-11-12 06:36:30+00:00): http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?lukfunk
Da steht gerade:
"Contributor has been deleted"
???
zorae (2019-11-12 07:23:27+00:00): Sorry about the incorrect tagging of cycleways! I will fix it promptly.

I run a private tile server that serves a combination of Esri, Maxar and Bing imagery.

I have certainly not been deleted :)
zorae (2019-11-12 10:48:08+00:00): I have now resolved all the issues related to my incorrect use of cycleways.
DressyPear4 (2019-11-07 16:02:30+00:00): O nome estava correto, você só adicionou uma tag inválida.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76766100
hackthemap (2019-11-12 11:37:37+00:00): aeroway=helipad should only be applied to the actual helipad, not an area which contains a helipad somewhere
see here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway=helipad?uselang=en-US
2 helipads are already mapped inside, if there are more, those can be mapped with additional points or areas
Fnordson (2019-11-12 11:40:16+00:00): Alright thank you. 
I did that through maproulette and it wasn't quite clear.
hackthemap (2019-11-12 11:56:00+00:00): You're welcome!
yeah, I assumed so, because of the maproulette tags in the changeset :)
hackthemap (2019-11-13 08:20:32+00:00): Are you changing that or should I?
Fnordson (2019-11-13 11:14:23+00:00): Mh, I just did and I reverted it to "hospital" but I still see 3 "H". Why is that?
hackthemap (2019-11-13 12:53:27+00:00): The 3 individual "H"s are from the individual helipads that are mapped correctly. The aeroway=helipad tag on the whole hospital was wrong and is now removed, so that is done correctly! :)
Or what did you mean?
Fnordson (2019-11-13 13:08:23+00:00): But there are only 2 Landing pads. 
https://www.bgu-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/Dateien/bgu-frankfurt/PDF/Weitere_Infos/AnflugInfoRTH_2014.pdf
I also don't see the 3rd one anymore. Maybe it came from what I did.
hackthemap (2019-11-14 15:08:51+00:00): Oh yes, sorry! If you did not remove anything else than the tag on the whole BG Unfallklinik, then the 3rd "H" was probably from the rendering of the whole BG Unfallklinik as another helipad.
So I think everything is correct now :)
Fnordson (2019-11-14 16:06:39+00:00): Yes, that would make sense. 
Thank you :)
hackthemap (2019-11-14 16:09:10+00:00): You're welcome! :)
gendy54 (2019-12-09 21:44:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76766251
The Controller13 (2019-11-07 15:37:28+00:00): ပြည်တော်သာ(၁၁)လမ်းအား ဈေးတံတားသစ်မှတဆင့် ကမ်းနားလမ်းနှင့်ချိတ်ဆက်ခြင်း၊ မြို့မဈေးရုံများ၏ ဧရိယာအားပြန်လည်ပြင်ဆင်ခြင်းတို့ ပြုလုပ်ပါသည်။
The Controller13 (2019-11-07 15:39:51+00:00): လမ်းအမည်နှင့်အမျိုးအစားထည့်သွင်းပါသည်။
dmlu (2019-11-07 15:45:36+00:00): Hi, did you check the latest geoportail.lu imagery?
pangoSE (2019-11-07 15:53:34+00:00): No, I missed that. What a nice source! Now I updated 2 reservoirs with the right tags. Thanks for the heads up :)
dmlu (2019-11-07 15:56:50+00:00): Awesome :) Thanks for the contribution!
pangoSE (2019-11-07 16:01:40+00:00): If you would like to help me fix water tags in other places see  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pangoSE/diary/391133
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-17 17:02:12+00:00): Hi pangoSE, this gives the impression of a mechanical edit. 
Could you tell us about your review methodology, decision criteria, and why you added "source:lake" to each object, instead of the changeset?
pangoSE (2020-03-19 06:45:16+00:00): Hi Polarbear. Correct, this was done before I was aware of the mechanical edits process and disadvantages. I personally find it valuable to be able to distinguish between different bodies of inland water. It should probably be reverted until a mechanical edit is agreed upon.
Because of the validation fixes the revert is probably best done by removing the tags only and not reverting the whole changeset.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-19 09:15:11+00:00): Hi pangoSE,
just to understand what you were doing - which are the validation fixes you talk about?
What does "Review by So9q" mean in your "source:lake" tagging?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9653990 looks more like a pond than a lake?
pangoSE (2020-03-19 13:07:20+00:00): I realized half way in that 1) the definition of pond/lake is subjective on the wiki. Thus the whole idea of discerning lakes from other waterbodies is moot as long as the definitions are crap. "A pond: a body of standing water, man-made in most cases, that is usually smaller than a lake." This is impossible to work with for me. 
You can delete the source:lake, the validation fixes was only related to the multipolygons of some lakes.
pangoSE (2020-03-19 13:10:10+00:00): IMO pond should not be mapped because it is not observable on the ground. A lake defined as a water body completely encased in land is observable on the other hand. The hard part of this quest to tag lakes was to handle all the improperly tagged waterways, reservoirs, etc in e.g. Balkan.
pangoSE (2020-03-19 13:16:57+00:00): FWIW I agree that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9653990 looks more like a pond. But it could have been a lake that was shaped by humans and thus not "man-made" completely.
pangoSE (2020-03-19 13:17:25+00:00): I just started a tagging discussion of how to define a pond in an observable way.
gendy54 (2019-12-09 21:44:09+00:00): Parfait
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76766722
sskalyan (2019-12-28 12:36:37+00:00): Hi,

Adding right only restriction in this case is redundant.

thanks,
Kalyan.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76766766
gendy54 (2019-12-09 21:43:12+00:00): La croissanterie n'étant pas un supermarché, j'ai changé le tag en fast-food, qui est plus adapté.
Attention également à la typographie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76767095
ndm (2019-11-07 22:43:14+00:00): If you select a building and press q -- I think that should straighten it up and "square" the edges.
GrooveBox (2019-11-08 09:29:25+00:00): In my defence I didn't add these houses. I just added house numbers! I've straightened them up anyway.
ndm (2019-11-08 19:55:43+00:00): My bad -- still they look nicer now :-)
user_5359 (2019-11-07 17:05:34+00:00): 
Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/50795416/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.
acubens71 (2019-11-07 17:24:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Il ne faut pas ajouter d'informations personnelles du type "maison de xx" dans openstreetmap.
user_5359 (2019-11-07 17:00:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Hjart (2019-11-07 18:55:24+00:00): Please do not include the imported danish adress nodes in buildings.
GBS Sidhu (2020-11-06 12:43:05+00:00): What does verification by "So9q" mean?
user_5359 (2019-11-07 16:49:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=commercial. Please use building=commercial.
FvGordon (2019-11-09 18:30:01+00:00): With Parkhaus 303 it looks like you have uploaded some levels multiple times, because I found the following ways of the north west spiral on top of each other, using the same nodes:
Level 2: 742978846, 742643120
Level 3: 742979579, 742967403, 742979267
Level 4: 742979685, 742979701, 742967354, 742979738
Level 5: 742979900, 742979974, 742979989, 742980023
Level 6: 742980124, 742980195, 742980160, 742980094
Since they all were uploaded with the same changeset, I think there was something wrong with your editor.
Also the staircases are duplicate in the same manner as the ways above.
Can you please repair this?
didier2020 (2019-11-11 10:51:33+00:00): hi,there is something wrong with yours changeset,
there is multiple duplicated way (exactly same geometry and exactly same tags)
like 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742979880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742980009
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742979986
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742979926

issues detected with osmose
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=germany_baden_wuerttemberg_stuttgart_regbez&item=1230

Can you repair this ? 
Thanks
Carto'Cité (2019-12-10 10:12:26+00:00): Bonjour :-)
Tu as mis le tag cycleway=yes sur ce tronçon suite aux travaux. C'est plutôt du lane vu ton commentaire, mais je me demande s'il y a une bande cyclables des 2 côtés et je ne le vois pas sur tes photos. Te souviens-tu s'il y a une bande de chaque côté ?
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
SomeoneElse (2019-11-21 22:41:14+00:00): Hello,
Your changeset comment here says "Fix Walmart Supercenters which are not shop/supermarket #maproulette"; can you explain how that relates to the actual changes made?
Best Regards,
Andy
Jakka (2019-11-07 20:44:59+00:00): La Capsule c'est le bar a bière ???
Glassman (2019-11-07 21:24:33+00:00): Instead of access=no, I think you want access=private. Access=no means no traffic is allowed, even the owners of the property. I'll change it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76769855
Wulf4096 (2019-11-13 09:20:57+00:00): @b-jazz,

your bot removed a line break from the "description" tag. Could you fix that bug please?

@abakus, b-jazz-bot did not add/modify the address. Please consider adding automatic changeset comments only in those cases, not when only unrelated changes were made to an object.