piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ambush (2017-09-12 09:45:25+00:00): Привет! 
Спасибо за правки.
С данными всё хорошо. 
Разве что addr:city указывать не обязательно, если объект находится в границах города. 

Успехов в картировании!
eggie (2018-01-14 17:17:21+00:00): Buiten Nederland begonnen met mappen en daardoor geen welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-09-11 11:45:28+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-11 10:34:07+00:00): Oke... succes verder
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-12 13:47:31+00:00): Hello AdriaanSP. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164436759 you tagged `name_francais`. Did you mean `name:fr`? (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization) #newkey
Øukasz (2017-09-13 21:15:49+00:00): added alt_name identical as name
ڕاستی (2017-09-24 20:17:59+00:00): From now I will fix that, thanks to warn me.
highflyer74 (2017-11-27 09:19:13+00:00): Moin! Ich bin gerade über ein paar von Dir eingezeichnete Häuser gestolpert, und habe festgestellt, daß viele von ihnen an einer Seite eine herausstehende Ecke haben. Auf den Luftbildern kann man gut erkennen, daß es sich jeweils um die Ecke des Dachs handelt, da die Bilder leicht schräg aufgenommen wurden. Bitte denke daran, daß wir in OSM ausschliesslich den Grundriss eines Gebäudes einzeichnen. Es wäre gut, wenn Du die Gebäude noch einmal anpassen würdest. Falls Du dabei Hilfe benötigst, lies Dir bitte einmal folgendes Tutorial durch, oder melde Dich bei mir. Danke! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
literan (2017-09-11 13:01:13+00:00): Добрый день. Увы, вы в этой правке сделали жуткий бардак, намешали в кучу заборы, дороги, дома. Пожалуйста, будьте аккуратнее, такие правки ни к чему. Откачу ее http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=51935981
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 12:57:49+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы уверены, что вот тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523690462/ именно парк, а не просто обычных московский сквер (с деревьями, лавочками и детскими/спортивными площадками) во дворе домов? Парк - это специальным образом обустроенное место, основное предназначение (использование) которого - рекреация.
Constable (2017-09-11 16:33:46+00:00): Ciao, i due laghi vicini all'aeroporto di Cameri credo che andrebbero etichettati come cave, non semplicemente come laghi
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dquarry
Confermi che siano due cave? sei della zona?
Øukasz (2017-09-13 21:18:05+00:00): changed correct wikidata tag to incorrect one
ڕاستی (2017-09-24 20:16:42+00:00): Why it is wrong I just replaced to Kurdish. It is wrong?
Øukasz (2017-09-24 22:08:52+00:00): please read carefully. you made a mistake with wikidata, not wikipedia tag.

it's better to have wikipedia tag in kurdish than english, but you have to learn what each tag is referring to. 

please don't change tags you don't understand.
mueschel (2018-04-22 10:14:45+00:00): Hallo,
3 Wegstücke haben jetzt zwei access:conditional tags, unter anderem dieser: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447013725

Welcher davon stimmt?
  access:conditional = no @ (Nov-May)
  access:conditional_1 = no @ (oct-may)

Gruß, Jan
Anton Khorev (2017-09-12 21:05:05+00:00): Если вы уверены, что ювелирный салон на Фонтанке, 92 работает, можете его снова отметить.
Табличка "ЧАСЫ РАБОТЫ ЮВЕЛИРНОГО САЛОНА" там уже давно висит, а сайт его давно не работает, признаков работы салона я не видел.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5099811352
VlIvYur (2017-09-13 18:30:14+00:00): Часы его работы не предполагают что я смогу попасть в него, даже если он работает
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-12 13:51:04+00:00): Hello Boggedy. At all the buildings you have edited, you add some new keys (Cork, Galway, Kerry, Mayo, and so on). What are these keys for? What are their meanings? Is this really public data? #newkey
eggie (2017-09-11 12:43:30+00:00): Je maakt van een doorgaande weg een voetpad. wat is k?
nm7s9 (2017-09-11 22:21:09+00:00): For Yoxford,
Google Street View shows a street sign that says Brevis Lane. Bing Maps also shows it as Brevis Lane (if you do a bing search for it).

I'm not sure we can use either of these, but at least there seem to be no active addresses on it yet. I guess it will have to be surveyed, at some polint.
freebeer (2017-09-12 14:01:38+00:00): Hi,
(excuse my kezb0ard problems)
Thanks, y0u have confirmed a text-only lynx br0wser search does n0t always return useful map results!  Interestingly, a search for Yoxf0rd and Houston returned only the same PDF I found from 2012.  Perhaps that was its planning name at that time?
Sadly, TIGERweb 2017 and Current show nothing, despite the range of time of the available imagery.
Nor do I get any useful go0gle results for Brevis Lane from here.
Westminster Village returns loads of realty listings for homes from 2016 and 2017 on a street not shown in 0SM, which is how I chose to repeat a search, this time seeking directions, which one listing gave.  There may be two variants of Wilthorne Gardens, with or without the Court.
Hmmm, n0w I cannot get any useful g00gle results apart from realty listings, from which I could pr0bably put address numbers 0n th0se 11 h0mes I added, using what I would think t0 be more precise search terms.  Is it just me, or has Thee Internet bec0me less useful f0r information?
I agree, I local survey is probably needed until updated TIGER data covers this new area. I won't bother to remove or correct my additi0ns, n0r will I object if someone deletes them.  They are based 0n my interpretati0n of multiple texts referencing this area, and not from anything graphical 0r pictorial.  (Perhaps I should st0p doing almost all browsing and searching with lynx, and join the 1990s?)
Thanks again f0r checking this.
eggie (2017-09-11 12:44:56+00:00): Je verandert het Sint Agnesplein in stadhuis???
eggie (2017-09-11 12:46:21+00:00): Wat is je bedoeling hier?
zstadler (2017-09-26 13:09:46+00:00): Hello,
.
Thanks for the update.
When you add a way to a landuse multi-poligon, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523721993, please add an "outer" or "inner" rone. Empty roles are no longer valid according to new OSM definitions.
.
Also, there is no need to duplicate the multi-polygon's "landuse" tag and add it to the way.
zstadler (2021-07-11 20:46:02+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52384588
eggie (2017-09-11 12:47:16+00:00): k?
eggie (2017-09-11 12:49:23+00:00): En nu weer Stadhuis?? 
Een straat heeft toch een officiële naam. Het heet hier toch geen Stadhuis?
eggie (2017-09-11 12:21:36+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
eggie (2017-09-11 12:32:46+00:00): Het is allemaal een beetje dubbelop zo. De info staat ook allemaal al op de BAG adresnode waar je ook het symbool van het museum ziet incl openingsuur. Adresnode 53 is denk ik per ongeluk verplaatst naar 55. Die moet dus terug naar gebouw naast 54. 
De officiële Friese naam moet eigenlijk zijn name=
en de Hollandse naam zou name:nl= moeten zijn. Dit dan op de node van het mueum.
Gaant u zelf wat aanpassen dan zet ik alleen nr 53 terug?
Museum Sloten (2017-09-11 13:57:08+00:00): Dank voor de feedback. Ik zou sowieso nog wat willen aanpassen, want wij zijn zowel vvv als museum in één gebouw, dus dat zou ik ook in de info willen onderscheiden. Maar dat lukt me nu even niet qua tijd.
adrianojbr (2017-09-15 01:11:29+00:00): olá. blz? não seria melhor usar múltiplos valores, separados por ponto e vírgula, para a chave voltage ao invés de usar voltage_1, como nesse caso: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500503115?
DressyPear4 (2017-09-15 16:59:13+00:00): Então, na wiki não tem nada parecido com esse caso, até pensei em separar em ; mas se fosse duas "voltage" em um único circuito.
Como são dois circuitos diferentes, resolvi separar por voltage 1 e voltage 2, não sei se está correto ou como mapear, então sempre deixo uma nota explicando.
adrianojbr (2017-09-15 17:24:50+00:00): claro, a nota foi boa ideia. mas não é recomendável usar o sufixo _1 para diferenciar tags, pois não é oficial e dificilmente terá alguma aplicação. por outro lado, na wiki, usar "ponto e vírgula", no caso da chave voltage, somente é mencionado para o caso de diminuição. é um dilema... mesmo assim, há vários usos (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=voltage#values a partir da página 4, especialmente) mara múltiplos valores que não parecem ser o caso de redução. como ambos estamos em dúvida, acho melhor deixar assim mesmo, até que alguém com mais experiência tenha uma solução melhor. abraço.
trigpoint (2017-09-14 12:46:54+00:00): What does GPB mean?
freebeer (2017-09-14 18:26:51+00:00): GRRRRREAT Pr*>pop<*thudKLONK*itish bounds...
Has anybody seen me teeth?
mueschel (2017-09-14 19:51:44+00:00): Sure... it was "currency:gbp", I wanted to fix it to capital letters... and mixed them up. Thanks for pointing out!
Jan
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-12 13:38:46+00:00): Hallo guidoknoop. Was bitteschön ist denn `winkelnr` bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2780049576 ? #newkey
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-12 13:39:39+00:00): Hello guidoknoop. Sorry, didn't recognized that you are nl. So, what is `winkelnr` at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2780049576 ?
guidoknoop (2017-09-17 19:37:22+00:00): Hi. I just copied it from another node. I'm not sure what it means.
kreuzschnabel (2017-12-25 14:28:51+00:00): In dieser Bearbeitung wurde ein Freileitungsmast fast einen Kilometer nach Osten geschoben, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1216511 Bitte aufpassen :)
kreuzschnabel (2017-12-25 14:31:44+00:00): Wurde das Ortsschild an dieser Stelle hinter den Kreisel versetzt? Derzeit gemappt auf http://osm.org/node/1624214330
Herr Sin (2017-12-29 19:43:53+00:00): Das Ortsschild ist nun nördlich des Kreisels.
mirror176 (2019-02-07 07:46:22+00:00): I couldn't find any left turn restriction from aerial and skimming some openstreetcam feeds so I removed it. If you know what lead to the conclusion of a turn not being allowed then please let me know so we can see if it was somehow relevant.
Minh Nguyen (2019-05-10 06:24:57+00:00): There’s nothing illegal about a curly apostrophe.
gendy54 (2017-09-11 14:12:16+00:00): merci de ta contribution.
Marcus Pearson (2017-09-11 13:14:47+00:00): #arup #arupdublin
Marcus Pearson (2017-09-11 13:15:18+00:00): #arup #arupdublin
DaCor (2017-09-27 02:51:13+00:00): Hi Eoin, you requested a review of your mapped feature. The house you mapped looks good. Feel free to add more features in your locality as we currently don't have many mappers in your area.
Marcus Pearson (2017-09-11 13:15:42+00:00): #arup #arupdublin
gendy54 (2017-09-11 14:15:00+00:00): merci de te contribution
Marcus Pearson (2017-09-11 13:16:01+00:00): #arup #arupdublin
Alexander-II (2018-04-13 21:45:42+00:00): Удалось за 7 месяцев наловить покемонов? Все правки откатываю.
Moiman (2017-09-11 17:06:01+00:00): Thanks for this and 
Hermia road. Good work.
Moiman (2017-09-12 12:58:38+00:00): Isn't the name of residential area Linttuhytti?
|Yucca| (2017-09-12 22:20:22+00:00): I thought so too, but in the city plan it says Hervantajärvi. You can also see it on the official map service of Tampere city.
Moiman (2017-09-13 05:53:48+00:00): I think it is reference to district Hervantajärvi and Lintuhytti is part of Hervantajärvi.

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hervantaj%C3%A4rvi_(kaupunginosa)

https://www.tampere.fi/asuminen-ja-ymparisto/rakentaminen/tontit/rivi-ja-kerrostalotontit/haettavat-tontit/lintuhytin-tonttien-asiakirjat.html
|Yucca| (2017-09-13 23:50:58+00:00): Changed it to Lintuhytti for now. Also realized that the other areas use a single point based name system, so it's in line with the other areas now too.
trapicki (2021-08-29 13:54:56+00:00): Mir scheint der Name und die Existenz dieses Gipfelpunktes sehr fragwürdig. Der Platz ist exponiert und wohl auch ein Aussichtspunkt wenn rundherum gerade Holz geschlagen wurde, aber wohl auch kein besonderer, wenn die Aussicht gerade 30° breit ist und zum Rabenwaldgipfel schaut. Der Punkt hat auch keine Dominanz/Schartenhöhe, also liegt in einer Neigung. 
Der einzige originale "Beleg", den ich finden konnte ist ein dort angelegter Geocache GC4BRQH gleichen Namens. Wenn es keine lokalen Gebrauch und besondere Bedeutung, keine Weghinweise, Gipfelmarkierung etc. gibt, meine ich ist der Punkt zu entfernen, weil die Benennung nur den Geocache und sonst nichts bezeichnet und irreführend ist. Ich komme aus der Gegend, mir wäre der Name nie untergekommen.
Aussicht, Lage, Geländeverlauf mit geoland.at und GIS Steiermark überprüft.
MMN-o (2017-09-11 16:33:14+00:00): Hej gunnar1m! Din kommentar till ändringsuppsättningen antyder att du använt en tredjepartskarta (med proprietär licens) som källa.

Det är som bekant, vilket upplyses om vid registreringen till OpenStreetMap, inte tillåtet att kopiera från andra kartor utan att dessa beviljar det - pga katalogskydd/upphovsrätt.

Det finns flygfoton att använda sig av genom de diverse programmen en kan använda för att redigera OpenStreetMap vilka har gett tillåtelse att kalkera/kopiera information. Detta inkluderar dock inte Eniro.

Tack för ditt engagemang och ändringar, men undvik gärna låsta källor som den du länkade till här .)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
BCNorwich (2017-09-22 06:23:24+00:00): Hello, there is no note on Green Gate passage.

Mapped as it is the footway is shown as going through a building, is this correct?  
If so is it a passageway through the building? |Which should be mapped accordingly, passage/tunnel.
Or a walkway that is part of the shop between a front and back entrance to the shop?
Or does the footway go between the two buildings exiting onto High Road via the gate?
There is some anomaly here!
Regards Bernard
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 20:00:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
Marcus Pearson (2017-09-11 13:16:09+00:00): #arup #arupdublin
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 20:00:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
Marcus Pearson (2017-09-11 13:16:18+00:00): #arup #arupdublin
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
Marcus Pearson (2017-09-11 13:16:24+00:00): #arup #arupdublin
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
rickmastfan67 (2017-09-13 07:10:34+00:00): Hello Silvertronica.  Unfortunately, this segment, while in the future will become I-87, isn't part of I-87 yet.  I-87 will be officially ending @ US-64 Business / NC-97's interchange at this time.

So, I recommend removing the I-87 lines from these two ways.

Here's a link to a news article about this.
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/traffic/article171521622.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 20:00:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
ToniE (2017-09-11 13:20:26+00:00): Sorry: Tippfehler:

Bus 178 wird zu Bus 179
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 19:59:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52337961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
Madmaks (2017-09-13 20:24:30+00:00): No i tu jest dylemat, bo import robiłeś z dwóch źródeł jednocześnie (iMPA i gugik) i w jednym było Janka, w drugim Ignacego. W dokumentach gminnych nie znalazłem jednoznacznej odpowiedzi, w większości dokumentów jest po prostu Krasickiego, w jednym chyba tylko znalazłem inicjał I - od Ignacego.
Madmaks (2017-09-13 20:31:08+00:00): Update: Właśnie wyczytałem, że np. w Radomiu ulica Janka Krasickiego idzie "pod nóż" w związku z ustawą dekomunizacyjną.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-09-14 06:20:46+00:00): Wiem, że Janek Krasicki idzie pod nóż w związku z dekomunizacją. Jednak w iMPA stoi jeszcze Janek, więc na taką wersję poprawiłem. Gdy się zmieni, to i w OSM można zmienić.
Madmaks (2017-09-14 06:42:15+00:00): W iMPA jest Janek, w GUGiK jest Ignacy. Według http://bip.skaryszew.pl/uchwala-nr-xiv-119-2011-z-dnia-30-grudnia-2011r-w-sprawie-w-sprawie-zmiany-uchwal-miejskiej-rady-narodowej-nr-9-60-z-dnia-11-maja-1960r-i-rady-narodowej-miasta-i-gminy-w-skaryszewie-nr-xxii-59-82-z-dnia-5-listopada-1982r-dotyczacych-nadania-nazw-ulic-na rację ma GUGiK i jest Ignacego. Poprawię.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-09-14 06:48:42+00:00): Ok, spoko. To, że adresy z gugiku dostały Ignacego, to i tak wynik pomyłki w skrypcie, który wszystkie adresy "Krasickiego" rozwijał do "Ignacego Krasickiego" (ten błąd został potem poprawiony). Ot, taka ciekawostka.
Zgłoszę, że mają błąd w iMPA.
Madmaks (2017-09-14 06:54:44+00:00): Ciekawostka jest taka, że w Geoportalu na warstwie PRG - Adresy widnieje "Ignacego Krasickiego" i w sumie to miałem na myśli pisząc GUGiK. Więc może skrypt w tym wypadku nie dodawał nic od siebie?
Ale dobrze, że udało się wyjasnić.
Sanniu (2017-10-05 12:12:50+00:00): You added ways not connected to anything, can you connect them there appropriate?
shahab0s (2017-11-12 19:56:45+00:00): سلام این مسیر وجود نداره
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523732510
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 13:35:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Тега crossing=zebra - это локальный тег для United Kingdom. Для всего оставшегося мира есть crossing=uncontrolled и он был указан до вашей правки. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
Алексей Мезенцев (2017-09-11 13:41:43+00:00): Спасибо за исправление. Буду теперь знать
gendy54 (2017-09-11 14:17:18+00:00): ok
mueschel (2017-09-11 20:14:25+00:00): Hi,
zwei Anmerkungen zu deinen Edits habe ich:
Häuser haben in der Regel rechte Winkel, bitte zeichne sie auch entsprechend. In iD, das Gebäude markieren und "S" drücken.
Außerdem gibt es jetzt hier einige Adressen doppelt und dreifach. Wenn du die Adresse an ein Gebäude setzt, dann kannst du den alten Knoten mit der Adresse durchaus auch löschen.
Gruß, Jan
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 13:26:51+00:00): Спасибо за исправления!
R0bst3r (2017-09-12 13:13:08+00:00): Hallo Luna2016,
ein kleiner Tipp, wenn du einen Hausumriss markierst und 'S' drückst, wird das Haus rechtwinklig. Das gleiche geht auch über einen Rechtsklick.
Sieht so dann schon viel besser aus ;)
Viele Grüße
gendy54 (2017-09-11 14:21:53+00:00): effectivement, ca parait mieux comme ca.