piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Aalbers69 (2022-04-29 06:56:42+00:00): Nevw - I've made a started untangling the landuses from the road network nodes. Not sure whether I'm on the right track with these changes but at least some of them are not connected anymore (welcome suggestions).
nevw (2022-04-29 07:37:25+00:00): Thanks, it can be a big task.
santamariense (2022-04-23 16:27:44+00:00): Olá. Estive revisando sua edição. Parece estar tudo OK. Fique a vontade para perguntar sobre qualquer dúvida que tenhas.
Participe do grupo OSM RS no Telegram: https://t.me/osmrs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120092872
VictorIE (2022-04-26 08:09:07+00:00): Hi,

Could you look at this https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14069375 There are three multipolygons, when there should probably be only one.
web_c (2023-06-12 14:58:26+00:00): Good morning clay_c,
I am part of the group that worked on the Pioneers Park and other related areas to the two major reservoir areas in west Houston. I would like to know on what basis you decided to overwrite a significant portion of our work, and on what measures you utilized.
clay_c (2023-06-12 15:36:00+00:00): Hi web_c,

I was going off accepted practice as documented on the wiki [1]. A detention basin is dry most of the time, and periodically filled up with stormwater. Most of the parks within the Addicks and Barker Reservoirs are flooded after heavy rains and close down temporarily. This implies that the basin area should include the parks.

The City of Houston was the source for the reservoir boundaries as originally mapped. Hurricane Harvey has raised some questions about where the true northern and western boundaries of the reservoirs are, but if anything, it should include a *larger* area as a result. For the parks to be excluded, there would need to be some sort of elevation-raising project to ensure they aren't flooded when the rest of the reservoir is, and I haven't found anything online about such a project.

Is there anywhere where I can read about the findings from your meetup group (for example, a user diary entry or an online discussion thread)? If not, could you summarize what happened in the local meetup?

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:basin%3Ddetention
user_2066394 (2022-04-24 10:34:47+00:00): Den ursprüngllichen POI hätte man weiterverwenden und aktualisieren können,
sockenfresser (2022-04-24 18:10:42+00:00): Hm, ich dachte die Tatsache, dass es komplett anderes Geschäft ist spiegelt eine Löschung und ein Neu anlegen am besten wieder.
sockenfresser (2022-04-24 18:11:41+00:00): Gibt es dazu eine Guideline oder sowas?
user_2066394 (2022-04-24 19:52:09+00:00): Guideline wäre, die Versionsgeschichte zu erhalten.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Dawid2849 (2022-04-24 08:27:09+00:00): natural=hillock? Moim zdaniem lepiej użyć natural=hill
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:natural%3Dhill
maraf24 (2022-04-26 21:32:31+00:00): hillock używam dla wzniesień, hill do gór i wzgórz.
Aczkolwiek granica jest tak płynna i nieokreślona na wiki, że w praktyce nie robi mi różnicy jaka wartość zostanie użyta i zapewne nie jestem konsekwentny w tagowaniu.
dgitto (2022-04-26 18:06:06+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2022-04-26 18:09:14+00:00): Cosa è l'Old River?
è mappato col solo nome. dunque non risulta nulla, solo un edificio (c'è un attività commerciale o qualcosa di simile?)
Tropeabiz (2022-04-26 18:16:55+00:00): Buonasera, trattasi di una attività: villaggio residence.

Da principiante, non sono riuscito ad apportare le modifiche, in quanto la piattaforma mi ha riportato degli avvisi che non sono riuscito a sistemare.
user4816003805 (2022-04-27 20:03:06+00:00): Yeah, I think that's fine. Nobody really maintains a consistent history anyway.
If somebody really wanted to see what was there before, they'd use an Overpass Turbo query to get historical data.
Eifelkobold! (2022-04-24 20:17:53+00:00): Guten Abend,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du in deinem Änderungssatz nicht mehr existierende und bereits als solche getaggte Gleise wieder hinzugefügt hast. Ich habe deine Änderungen daher mit Änderungssatz 120137890 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120137890) zurückgesetzt.

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
julcnx (2022-04-24 15:15:31+00:00): In the future, please kindly consider splitting your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120095086
totera (2022-04-28 18:42:56+00:00): Attenzione, all'incrocio di due strade ci deve essere un nodo in comune!
emvee (2022-04-23 15:51:03+00:00): Not only because there is cyclestreet=yes but also because there is bicycle_road=yes
SekeRob (2022-04-23 17:07:16+00:00): Buildings on pedestrian areas are invisible in Carto Standard unless made inner to the area. Mapped the post office building on St.Peter's square, never wanted to appear. Roofs OTOH show because they are on layer=1 these days.

cheers
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-25 19:56:13+00:00): please, dont add personal info, only public info
ivanbranco (2022-10-29 23:11:58+00:00): Hi WABOWE,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054228900/history

what's the source of this edit? The changeset says the imagery used is Bing but the quality there isn't good enough to recognize such feature.
alester (2022-04-25 16:08:36+00:00): I see you're adding relations for various sections of The Great Trail around here. The trail had already been mapped, so these new relations seem to duplicate what was already there. Can you explain what these new relations are intended to add?
niggi_over9000 (2022-04-25 16:25:16+00:00): Hello! To be rendered correctly at hiking.waymarkedtrails.org the trail needs to be mapped as a hiking route as well. That's why I am adding them a second time as hiking trails. I am happy to discuss other methods, if that works as well!
alester (2022-04-25 17:00:43+00:00): Thanks for clarifying. The overall TGT relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10038690) already specifies that it's both a hiking and bicycle route, so it could be that the waymarkedtrails.org site just doesn't process that correctly.

One thing I noticed is that most of the relations you've added on Vancouver Island almost exactly duplicate the route relations for the various regional trails (e.g. Sooke Hills Wilderness Trail). A better solution might be to include those relations as sub-relations of a parent one. At the very least, a new hiking-specific route relation should probably mirror the existing bicycle one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13256756) as closely as possible, rather than break the hiking one up into various artificially-named relations.

There likely is some room for improvement with the relations for TGT. However, things got a bit messy a while back when someone else made some large-scale changes to the TGT mapping, so I think this would need to be discussed with the Canadian OSM community first. Now that things have settled down a bit, we might all be able to come to an agreement on a better way to handle things.
niggi_over9000 (2022-04-26 15:16:56+00:00): I decided to use the trail sections that are used at https://tctrail.ca/explore-the-map/ because they will be displayed as single sections in the Waymarkedtrails map: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=10038690&type=relation
Some sections have specific values - for example a special description (e.g. Nanaimo River Interim Bypass Connector) or a different website.
I also added these relations as sub relations of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10038690

Happy to discuss some more ideas!
niggi_over9000 (2022-04-26 15:19:58+00:00): Also to add, that https://openstreetmap.org/relation/4781170
and
https://openstreetmap.org/relation/8272468
were already part of the parent relation when I started mapping the new parts.
Enock4seth (2022-04-23 22:47:17+00:00): thanks for mapping, may be check offset against data existing data around this area. Bing seems to have best alignment but old.  So aligning  Maxar to Bing before new data would be very helpful. Merci :)
streckenkundler (2022-04-23 16:42:36+00:00): Ohhhh.. du bis ja fleißig! :)

Der User itchybellybutton hat mir Fotos von einer Reihe von Wegweisern zugearbeitet... Das werde ich auch mal einarbeiten... Da sind auch Ergänzungen vom Knotenpunktnetz mit dabei...

freut sich Sven
klnkengi (2022-04-23 17:26:04+00:00): Hallo Sven, 

ich habe Fotos von diesen 3 Wegweisern gemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9670230431
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9631607317
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9688030386
Wenn Du willst, kann ich sie Dir gerne auch schicken. 

Mit Hilfe dieser Fotos und Mapillary habe ich jetzt also so gut es ging die Radrouten angepassst. Das stimmt wahrscheinlich noch nicht zu 100 %, aber es sollte schon mal besser sein als vorher. 

Unter anderem fehlt jetzt bei einigen Routen der Abschnitt zwischen Knotenpunkt 37 und Jahrtausendbrücke. Die 7-Seen-Tour muss auch irgendwie anders verlaufen, denn rund um die Steintorbrücke gibt es keinerlei Radwegweisung (zumindest habe ich keine gesehen) und am Knotenpunkt 20 ist sie auch nicht in diese Richtung ausgeschildert.

Wenn Du also mit Hilfe weiterer Wegweiser noch mehr anpassen kannst, gerne :)
user_5359 (2022-04-23 16:59:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/9687159114 over 100 meters, please check the position.
szydzio (2022-05-27 15:18:26+00:00): Hej! Sporo tych punktów na Sadowej opisanych jako "source:addr	gugik.gov.pl", choć w bazie GUGiK-u ich nie ma... Skąd wiadomo, że takie punkty będą nadane ?
julcnx (2022-04-24 15:15:38+00:00): In the future, please kindly consider splitting your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120097515
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2022-04-24 16:36:18+00:00): Thank you for your message, it's a good point regarding reviewing.
I'll keep it in mind.
Joseph R P (2022-04-26 19:31:43+00:00): Why did you upgrade Dorsey Hotel Road to primary and change its name to 'Pennsylvania ave'?
fkv (2022-09-01 15:24:39+00:00): Was soll denn dieser Name bedeuten? Ein Amt für Weihnachtsdekoration, ist das ein Tippfehler?
Robot8A (2022-09-01 17:37:27+00:00): Kein Fehler: https://kurier.at/chronik/wien/tor-aus-ma-2412-steht-jetzt-auf-dem-wienerberg/401042935 ;)
Robot8A (2022-09-01 17:47:25+00:00): https://www.wien.gv.at/presse/2020/09/24/tor-aus-ma-2412-nun-auf-aussichtspunkt-am-wienerberg
fkv (2022-09-01 18:17:49+00:00): Ok, dann hab ich mich also geirrt, als ich es als Kunstwerk getaggt habe. Ich hab schon oft so Durchblickfenster gesehen, die eine schöne Aussicht verdeutlichen sollen. Dass dieses Tor die Fans einer Fernsehserie ansprechen soll, auf die Idee bin ich nicht gekommen.
goaned (2023-09-25 21:24:39+00:00): aber "Weinachtsdekoration" ohne "h" an der vierten Stelle ist schon ein Tippfehler, oder? Zumindest ist in den verlinkten Artikeln nichts von diesem Tippfehler zu sehen.
Robot8A (2023-09-26 07:29:34+00:00): Ja, es ist ein Tippfehler. Deutsch ist nicht meine Muttersprache und ich habe es falsch geschrieben. Es ist jetzt korrigiert. Danke
highflyer74 (2022-05-26 07:07:25+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Beim Mapping von Indoor Features sind hier einige Geometrieprobleme entstanden. Teilweise sind Dinge miteinander verbunden, die nicht miteinander verbunden sein sollten und umgekehrt.

Versuche bitte auch, gerade Linien nur zwischen zwei Nodes verlaufen zu lassen und die Dinge rechtwinklig zu mappen (Taste Q). Generell würde Dich der Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) auf viele Umstimmigkeiten hinweisen und Dir ermöglichen, die Qualität zu verbessern.

Viele Grüße!
krusefahrer (2022-04-23 17:16:56+00:00): Hi RollTide,

are all these streams mapped from imagery?
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2022-04-23 22:51:32+00:00): The comment above was made by a sockpuppet whose only purpose is to harass other users with unnecessary changeset comments as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Sockpuppets and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15298403&commented . For everyone else interested in this project, everything in osmus-tasks-248 and all future project phases like this utilize a combination of aerial imagery and USGS topo and 3D maps (not all streams are easily visible off the aerials but clearly visible in the 3D/topo maps)
ZeLonewolf (2022-04-24 01:18:56+00:00): Sock puppet documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Sockpuppets
multimodaal (2022-08-06 14:23:58+00:00): Hoi, je had dit pad weer opengezet, maar een andere mapper had 'm de dag daarna weer dichtgegooid:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/255427380

Je bent meer dan welkom iom in onderstaande link aan te geven wat volgens jou de huidige situatie in het veld is:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120112988

Thx!

 asis van
robert_da16 (2022-05-21 11:28:41+00:00): I'm puzzled as to whether the contraflow nature of cycle is correctly represented.  Komoot seems unaware of it (routing westbound riders via King William St).  It may be that Komoot is using an an out-dated version of OSM. But its worth checking the tags for the cycle lane to make sure its shown as westbound contraflow .
robert_da16 (2022-05-21 11:31:45+00:00): Clarification to avoid confusion :
"I'm puzzled as to whether the contraflow nature of cycle lane in Nevada Street  is correctly represented."   ........ etc
RedAuburn (2022-05-21 12:43:58+00:00): Ah good catch! I've updated the tagging to correctly mark it as contraflow :)

Fixed in this changeset:
https://www.osm.org/changeset/121280785
marconius (2022-04-24 15:58:28+00:00): Ou est-ce que vous avez trouvé le projet pour l'extension du boul de souvenir? A: je suis presque certain que ce projet n'existe plus dans le cadre du Schéma d'aménagement et de développement révisé (SADR). B: ce trajet figure comme un voie disponible dans mes directions.

Je vais l'enlever, mais si il y a un vrai projet d'extension,  s'il vous plaît citez-le. merci
Martin868 (2022-04-25 09:29:00+00:00): Je l’avais déjà mis proposed. Ça aurait pu rester comme ça car c’est pas visible. Ce qui etai pas acceptable c’est que ca avait été ajouté comme si la route existait et elle existe pas, même pas en construction. Mais la il est enlevé… c’était pas nécessaire.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 17:27:02+00:00): realigned roads to match satellite imagery shown in ID editor
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-23 19:24:23+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha retirado la etiqueta de mercado amenity=marketplace y se han modificado nombres sin motivo aparente, por lo que he restaurado los valores anteriores. Por favor ingrese un texto en el conjunto de cambios de tal modo que el resto de la comunidad pueda entender en que han consistido los cambios. Puede ver mayor información en la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjunto de cambios. [1] Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla en el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad peruana. 
Saludos
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
SekeRob (2022-04-28 07:40:23+00:00): Hi,

what are there tourism=information.... information=guidepost? Please add the information type.

The cascade needs to be part of a line i.e. if you know the route of the fosso delle Farfalle, please add.

cosa ci sono tourism=information... information=guidepost? Si prega di aggiungere il tipo di informazioni.

La cascata deve essere parte di una linea, quindi se si conosce il percorso del fosso delle Farfalle si prega di aggiungere.

grazie
SekeRob (2022-09-02 06:40:15+00:00): Hi

As a reminder, do yuo have an answer for me so the issues can be fixed?

MTIA

Come promemoria, hai una risposta per me in modo che i problemi possano essere risolti?

MGIA
Wessmanu (2022-09-02 07:15:26+00:00): La cascata era asciutta. Immagino che lo sia gran parte dell'anno. La cascata si raggiunge con un breve percorso a piedi lungo il quale ci sono dei cartelli esplicativi (informativi) della zona, dato che e' dentro una zona naturalistica. Ho inserito i dati tramite la app maps.me che non mi consentiva di aggiungere altro.
SekeRob (2022-09-02 09:10:49+00:00): Grazie

appl i info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125687697 incl i fosso.

ciao
马陵秋月 (2022-04-24 02:34:24+00:00): 默认是amenity=driving_school，可以渲染。您修改的amenity=driver_training无法渲染，请核实。
Lepuse (2022-04-24 03:11:56+00:00): amenity=driving_school适用于室内设施，室外训练场使用amenity=driver_training是更恰当的标签。由于西方国家此类设施较罕见，因此该标签暂未得到广泛支持（仅OsmAnd支持渲染），我们需要更多使用以争取渲染支持。
user_5359 (2022-04-24 11:10:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look http://www.osm.org/way/783009325. What is the of the tag 余杭汽车驾驶员培训中心 = 广信驾校? Did you mean name = 广信驾校?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
abakus_uploader (2022-04-23 22:31:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MxxCon (2022-04-24 04:05:50+00:00): Hello.
Do you have more info about this feature? Its name would be highly helpful.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120099722
kw-ny (2022-04-24 18:32:44+00:00): It's an art installation with "birds" like motive, using silver metal, just to look pretty on an otherwise concrete round object.  ALthough there was some water damage to the art installation and it's kind of half-complete now (it's damaged)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120099722
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Honey Fombuena (2022-04-23 20:34:40+00:00): Hello! Please correct the capitalization of the fast food name. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120099872
Vivek Dumre (2024-02-10 12:56:30+00:00): Noted with thanks
Honey Fombuena (2022-04-23 20:33:36+00:00): Hi! Thanks for mapping. Please change the name with the correct capitalization. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120099925
Cartographer10 (2022-04-23 18:13:05+00:00): Oeps verkeerde omschrijving. Moet zijn "toevoegen parking:lanes en parkeren"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
rmikke (2022-05-20 23:00:58+00:00): Hej :)

Według CSIOZ (rejestru aptek Ministerstwa Zdrowia, aktualizowany codziennie) tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9688351316 nie ma i nigdy nie było apteki. Czy można tam realizować recepty? Czy jest tam jakiś widoczny napis APTEKA?
rmikke (2022-05-20 23:13:07+00:00): Dobra, nie było sprawy. Szukałem pod adresami przy ulicach na "O", na "S" i na "L", a trzeba było szukać na "A" :)
ovruni (2022-04-23 19:26:39+00:00): Hola Silviopalomino, el valor para la superficie aquí es concrete. Puede encontrar mayor información en la documentación sobre la clave surface [0]
Saludos
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:surface
habi (2022-08-19 12:18:15+00:00): You've tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054250438/ `access=no`, are the steps really generally closed?
whb (2023-08-06 13:44:15+00:00): Guten Tag!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9688378054

Wahrscheinlich sind es 10 Schließfächer mit je einer Steckdose drin, welche gemietet werden können (für 1 Tag, 1 Woche, 1 Monat oder 1 Jahr):
https://www.bikeandridebox.de/order/booking

Viele Grüße
whb
Leo Slager (2022-04-24 12:25:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2022-04-24 12:29:47+00:00): Dit lijkt erg veel op vandalisme.
Ik overweeg de changeset te reverten.
Graag een reactie.
Leo Slager (2022-04-24 13:06:11+00:00): Bij de beide firma s in Zeist heb ik het eea toegevoegd.
aixbrick (2022-04-25 08:20:12+00:00): Hallo,
viel hilft viel ist bei den Zutritts-Berechtigungen leider nicht so gut. Bitte setze nur die Berechtigungen, die aufgrund einer Beschilderung nötig sind. Hilfreich ist dabei https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/. Wenn z.B. Motorfahrzeuge mit Ausnahme landwirtschaftlicher Fahrzeuge verboten sind, dann ist das motor_vehicle=agricultural. Alle anderen Berechtigungen müssen (und sollten) nicht gesetzt werden.
Gruß
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
38446 (2022-04-24 15:44:41+00:00): Danke fürs Ergänzen der fehlenden Straße! Habe noch die Oberflächeninformation hinzugefügt und die Linie von der Wiesenfläche getrennt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120101314
geo-d (2022-04-23 18:42:22+00:00): Änderungskommentar muss heißen:
Für Bus 463 Check Haltestellen und Tags (Source: Münchner Verkehrs- und Tarifverbund GmbH (MVV), Feed-Version 2022.0215.1822)
Für Geschäft: Name geändert (Source: survey)
krusefahrer (2022-04-23 18:49:36+00:00): Are "stone corals" really a farmyard?
ChristianB77 (2022-04-23 19:25:42+00:00): I'm going off of this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:farmyard%3Dstockyard Stone Corrals are a very useful reference point in the mountains here, and they do fit the definition of a Stockyard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.