piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:46:57+00:00): reverted
ID`s (2020-02-12 14:07:49+00:00): Что-то не помню я напротив 8-го дома подъездной дороги. Максимум пешеходная дорожка. Там же остановка.
user_5359 (2020-02-12 15:11:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2020-02-12 11:23:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Tip: Gebouwen worden in OSM niet zelf ingetekend of aangepast, maar geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. dat kan middels een verzoek in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. Dan komen de juiste Kadastergegevens op het gebouw. Kennelijk is hier iets "verbouwd".
Een verzoek kun je hier doen https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog identiek aan OSM account.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-12 11:29:48+00:00): Is er bij nr 57 een nieuw gebouw gekomen?  Of heb je wellicht naar de dakrand gekeken. Dat vertekent enorm en een luchtfoto kun je niet gebruiken om een gebouw aan te passen.


De kadaster info https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=bosch%2057%20budel&resultOffset=0&geometry.x=169466.78272967&geometry.y=364473.61214526&zoomlevel=7&objectId=1706100000056659&detailsObjectId=1706010000010455
Hier kun je ok een terugmelding doen als iets niet klopt.

Gr eggie
eggie (2020-02-12 18:42:37+00:00): De BAG importeur heeft het gebied van een update voorzien. Svp niets aan gebouwen veranderen. Ik zie dat het gebouw in het midden weer naar de data van het Kadaster is hersteld. Wanneer de uitbreiding wellicht een overkapping is kan deze apart ingetekend worden als building=roof.
Klopt het dan nog niet dan een terugmelding naar het Kadaster svp.
MVG,
Eggie
Jan Wilts (2020-02-12 13:00:16+00:00): Waar zat de fout? Ik heb geen warning van JOSM gehad....
Leo Slager (2020-02-12 14:34:11+00:00): Dag Jan,
In dit geval zit de fout bij het opknippen van de rotondes.
Hier kun je dat zien:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=5.80134&lat=53.19998&zoom=13&overlays=ptv2_routes_,ptv2_routes_valid,ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
De oorzaak ligt erin dat JOSM het opknippen van een rotonde niet correct kan verwerken in de routerelatie. Het ontbreekt aan voorgaande en volgende wegen zodat de volgorde niet bepaald kan worden.
Eigenlijk zou je voor het opknippen van een weg moeten kijken welke routerelaties er lopen. Na het opknippen van de weg moet er tenminste 1 van de 2 busroutes gerepareerd worden omdat de wegen niet in de juiste volgorde staan.
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:25:32+00:00): Hi, access=no.Why?
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:47:57+00:00): reverted
mavl (2020-02-17 16:09:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81124906 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3502].
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:24:45+00:00): Hi, access=no. Why?
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:48:52+00:00): reverted
abrensch (2022-01-19 12:37:24+00:00): Hallo Vrifox,

die zweite Abbiegebeschränkung scheint mir unplausibel:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10704446
vrifox (2022-01-19 14:31:39+00:00): Hallo abrensch, 

ich wohne weit weg und die Änderung ist zwei Jahre her; deshalb kann ich es nicht mehr nachvollziehen.
zstadler (2020-12-03 11:44:27+00:00): נראה שיש כפילות, אך לא זהות, בין
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771864439
שנוסף כאן ובין
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/749765728
שנוסף קודם לכן
hatul (2020-12-03 15:54:21+00:00): המקור של 749765728 הוא בקובץ ישן יותר של רט״ג ולכן כנראה בטעות הוספתי את השמורה פעמיים. אני מציע למחוק אותו.
הייתי מוחק בעצמי אבל iD לא מאפשר למחוק אלמנטים גדולים כאלה ואין לי פה JOSM.
zstadler (2020-12-05 04:52:13+00:00): מחקתי
Thibaultmol (2020-02-13 11:50:42+00:00): Welcome to Openstreetmap! I just wanted to quickly mention that making changesets that cover such a large area are very inpractical to review. Please don't make your changesest larger than atleast 1 country
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:24:06+00:00): Hi, you tagged some tracks and paths with access=no. Why?
andi9876 (2020-02-15 13:49:41+00:00): reverted
MitjaJez (2020-02-23 15:13:06+00:00): Na kakšni podlagi je vnešen rečni kanal?
taxi301 (2020-02-12 22:24:20+00:00): dobrze że reagujesz , poprawiłem obrys kościoła , jest po obrysie budynku według geoportalu , trawniki są oddalone od budynku około 0.5m. pomiędzy budynkiem drobny kamień , chcesz mapować pytaj albo tu lub jako prywatną wiadomość na emaila
VARVAR8 (2020-04-03 11:28:40+00:00): Чому пішохідні/велопереходи не мапиш за правилами (не теґуєш)?
VARVAR8 (2020-04-03 11:38:10+00:00): Велодоріжку не потрібно дублювати. Вона вже існувала на тому місці спарена з пішохідним переходом:
bicycle=yes
crossing=uncontrolled
footway=crossing
highway=footway
aharvey (2020-02-12 23:09:16+00:00): Hi Hb-, there has been concern raised at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2020-February/013619.html that this data isn't able to be determined reliably by Bing and ESRI imagery and concerns that some of this information may have come from non-free sources. Are you able to confirm here what sources of information this changeset used? Did you refer to https://www.ddmrb.org.au/ for the location of the fence?

Many thanks,
Andrew Harvey
Data Working Group
aharvey (2020-02-17 04:10:02+00:00): Thanks for explaining the background of this edit. I think it's okay if you see a photo or read a book which hint you to look at a particular area in OSM that might need updating, however it was pointed out that the fence is not visible on imagery, so how are you determining the exact geometry to use?
Hb- (2020-02-17 17:39:52+00:00): > it was pointed out that the fence is not visible on imagery,

I could see the surroundings of that special fence on long parts. The contrary opinion – invisible fence – is also correct but luckily only for smaller parts.

Please take notice from the fence edit I made the day before. It was based on the knowledge that the fence must be somewhere at the border. 

The first try was the border crossing at Collins gap with an already mapped cattle grid, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7205341210. But the aerials showed only some 20 m of fence south of the buildings.

The first crossing where Mapillary showed the rabbit sign was the Border Road near Killarney, see source of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7205325473. With other Mapillary photos the fence situation on that crossing became clear.  I was able to map the fence 3.5 km eastwards and 15 km westwards.  And then I stopped mapping because of lacking visibility of the surroundings of the fence in the aerials.  

The LPI NSW Aerial for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7205341210 shows the problem clearly.  With todays training it is clear that fence is 71 m further up North from this node and that the last segment I mapped was a private fence.

The next day I found the "Rabbit Fence" Road and that lead to the Granit Belt Drive near Cotton Vale.  Again good On the Ground image https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=i3QCjdFP4wrPeQvf6IEs2w showed the fence.  The next farm to Northwest also had a cattle grid on the driveway so it became clear on which side of the road the fence is.

Unfortunately I did not map all those minor points with the first upload. After writing this reply I will add the clues used for mapping and come back to this when ready.

I therefore hold the position that either the fence itself or at least its surroundings are visible on large parts.


>so how are you determining the exact geometry to use?

I did not mapped the 'exact' geometry, I mapped a guess where the fence probably would be.

Currently nobody knows where the fence is.  We only have the data from the agricultural department (Thanks Mike!).  But this data makes the problem even worse.  Because on small parts of my guess are better than their data.  It seems to good to be only a guess. 

As the Lineage descriptions history tells, the data was made in 2008 with Garmin GPS (5-10 m accuracy) ???? and in 2013 'updated' using Aerials from 2013.  

So the agricultural department did the same that the other fence mappers and I did. They mapped aerials.  

Unsurprisingly the results are very similar.
Hb- (2020-02-26 22:57:08+00:00): As said, I added some sources on the fence mapping to the OSM. After downloading https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10703889 the relation and it's members the sources are easily selectable with  this JOSM search query: 
(child (type:relation id:10703889) OR child (child (type:relation id:10703889)))
trigpoint (2020-02-12 13:04:32+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Most of your edits seem to involve copying information from websites. Do you have specific permission to copy from these sites.

The geographical spread of your edits suggest you are not using local knowledge and the address for this one suggests you have placed it in the wrong place.

Please could you confirm your sources and permissions obtained.

Cheers Phil
rskedgell (2020-02-12 15:38:47+00:00): The T&Cs for the site used in the website=* tag for these edits seem pretty clear that this use of their copyrighted data is prohibited.
https://www.chefonline.co.uk/terms-and-conditions
DeBigC (2020-02-15 10:33:44+00:00): @alex_murray51 please dont add nodes to straight lines when drawing buildings
SHARCRASH (2020-02-12 12:15:15+00:00): + new element
Dave Venables (2020-02-12 16:37:36+00:00): I was going to remove or merge this due to duplication of existing way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219950852 for Shapla Spice but can see it has been removed already. If you have acceptable sources for the extra information the existing way can be updated - details in existing way from the Food Standards Database that does not include opening hours or phone.
kratal (2020-06-03 16:00:13+00:00): Hi, in dem Änderungssatz wurden für Teile des Radwegs 98 Zugangsbeschränkungen für Fussgänger gesetzt. Aber für Radfahrer ist der weg offen. Ich vermute, dass auch Wanderer da das ganze Jahr durchdürfen. Betrifft z.B Weg 45195906
Polarbear (2020-02-12 12:24:53+00:00): source: mapillary for street perspective, names and housenumbers
skyper (2020-02-13 14:14:41+00:00): Hi Seebärius,
please, stop changing only "FIXME" to "fixme" on objects you do not edit otherwise. This just raises the version number of objetcs without reason.
See e.g.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9873992/history

"FIXME" is not deprecated !
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme

Thanks skyper
Seebärius (2020-02-17 06:04:46+00:00): Thank you for the update!
viloan (2020-02-12 13:36:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2020-02-12 14:51:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
breno-au (2020-02-14 23:51:50+00:00): Hi @Davideous, if you walk past John Street there is definitely barriers there. For more info see https://www.moreland.vic.gov.au/about-us/projects/road-and-drainage-projects/john-street-brunswick-east---trial-road-closure/
breno-au (2020-02-14 23:54:24+00:00): Would you kindly revert. Thank you.
Davideous (2020-02-16 16:25:13+00:00): I watched the Moreland Council meeting. The "trial" has been extended until July. A lot of locals and a Councillor are against it. Change it if it becomes a permanent closure. It may not become permanent.
Davideous (2020-02-16 16:28:00+00:00): The entire park is soon to be re-modeled finally. But until then it should stay as is. I believe.
matthewsheffield (2020-02-21 22:59:41+00:00): That person was me. OSM should reflect "on the ground truth". At the moment you can cycle along John Street, but not drive. Driving directions would be wrong without a cycle barrier there, but cycle directions correct, as it would route a bike through a cycle barrier. That's the point of cycle barrier nodes. Being able to change the map for relatively short periods weeks/months is also one of the benefits of OSM.

Please revert.
Davideous (2020-02-22 12:18:45+00:00): Sorry. But I do not know how to revert a change. Help search did not help me.
breno-au (2020-02-23 01:07:15+00:00): Re-implemented vehicle barrier to match on the ground truth. Done. Thanks both.

This will particularly help with GPS routing, particularly with hundreds of residences about to move into EBV. No need to route them down John Street, only to be blocked by the barrier.

If the vehicle barrier is reviewed by council mid-year, and if the determination is to remove the vehicle barrier, then it is very easy to edit once it's physically gone from the street. Until that possibly happening, it's best to match what's physically there on the ground.
Kovoschiz (2020-02-13 12:05:53+00:00): This is an editor software (iD) problem, not "vandalism". `highway=track` means agricultural or forestry road, which the 林道 here fits. Still, if you want to consider changing its classification, you should add a `surface=paved` in lieu of `tracktype=grade1`.
Kovoschiz (2020-02-13 12:06:39+00:00): The "unmaintained track road" misnomer is a well-known controversy.
Jeffrey Friedl (2020-02-14 01:37:27+00:00): Thanks for the info. I'm not familiar with the controversy you mention (pointers would be apprecaited), but in this case it's not a forestry road. It's a road rode, for normal cars doing normal things. I was literally there yesterday.
Jeffrey Friedl (2020-02-14 01:45:27+00:00): Please note that「林道」simply means "road through a forest", though in a certain context it can indeed mean "forestry road".  Some  林道 are scenic toll roads.
kellerk (2020-02-12 15:20:58+00:00): I wanted to add a clearcut in the forest, but unfortunately it cleared the whole forest. Can somebody help please ?
kellerk (2020-02-12 15:35:41+00:00): I can't revert using RevertUI - Job 2786
see error message below:
Reverting changesets: 80909709
Comment:
User: kellerk
Added: 12.02.2020

Status: system error
Error: 'Response' object has no attribute 'code'
viloan (2020-02-12 14:20:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kellerk (2020-02-12 15:23:06+00:00): I wanted to add a clearcut in the forest, but unfortunately it cleared the whole forest. Can somebody help please?
flohoff (2020-02-13 15:31:02+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier den changeset gesehen und bin mir da nicht ganz sicher. Name ist ja wirklich ein Eigenname somit auch alt_name. loc_name ist ein name der nur lokale bedeutung hat. Und wenn ich mir die names hier ansehe - IMHO solle das in ein ref oder loc_ref - "Gebäude 2" als ref oder so. Denn es ist eigentlich kein Eigenname oder?

Und ich halte auch loc_name hier für richtiger.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80911572
Falk_L (2020-02-24 17:49:35+00:00): Moin,
an Ihren Eingängen sind die Gebäude sind mit "Gebäude <n>" gekennzeichnet. Als alt_name würde ich die Bezeichnungen Vorschlagen die auf einer Übersichtskarte am Hochschulgelände aufgeführt sind. Als Beispiel wäre es für Gebäude 1: name=Gebäude 1, alt_name=Haupteingang, Bibliothek, Audimax
flohoff (2020-02-25 12:01:40+00:00): Das ist aber kein "name" - Das wäre es wenn das die "Luise-Hensel Halle" oder "Otto-Graf-Lambsdorf-Saal" wäre. 

Wenn die Nummeriert sind sind das "referenzen" und damit gehören die in "ref" nicht in "name".

name ist wirklich für Eigennamen.

Flo
Falk_L (2020-02-25 16:50:48+00:00): Guter Einwand. Die Gebäude sind Nummeriert. Auf den Schildern am Eingang steht am auffallendsten "Gebäude <Nr>" oder nur "<Nr>" und darunter die Fachbereiche/Institute die im Gebäude Räume haben. Die sprechenden Namen (z.B. Hauptgebäude) sind im Vorlesungs- und Raumverzeichnis der TH OWL aufgeführt. Sie stehen nicht aussen am Gebäude. Beide Namen werden im täglichen Gebrauch gleichwertig verwendet. Wie wäre es mit

name=Hauptgebäude
alt_name=Gebäude 1
ref=1

Kannst du mir einen kleinen Hinweis geben wich ich die ref (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref) korrekt verwende.
flohoff (2020-02-26 10:28:36+00:00): In ref würde ich nur die nummern schreiben. Also sowas wie ref=1. Die Beschreibung was da drin ist würde ich in "description=" hinterlegen. Mit name hat das ja nichts zu tun.

Wenn jemand dann einen Campus plan machen wollen würde würde der dann die Description rendern.

Flo
flohoff (2020-02-26 10:29:01+00:00): Und das das ganze die Technische Hochschule OWL ist sollte ja über den Campus outline gegeben sein
literan (2020-02-12 16:35:06+00:00): Добрый день. Не надо удалять корректный тег crossing=uncontrolled с переходов
Pippi Dissertation (2020-02-12 15:26:56+00:00): Is this addition ok? I have named the reputable sources and the data is understandable to all. Let me know if this is not contributing appropriately to the OpenStreetMap.
Allison P (2020-02-12 17:29:14+00:00): If a tag needs to have multiple values, they should be separated with semicolons rather than slashes. Since edifice_height is an undocumented tag, it would be helpful to create a page on the OSM wiki explaining what it means. While it would be incorrect to delete it, it would clear up confusion for other mappers.

Thanks,
Allison P
freebeer (2020-02-13 06:00:35+00:00): I'm a bit concerned about the admissibility of your source for OSM, as mentioned in the multiple comments to your earlier changeset, in that the best I could get from a search was an abstract describing the paper, and the feeling it was behind a paywall or something, but I wasn't motivated to search thoroughly on an inconvenient Handy.  Mention is made of a website-to-come, but I found no details.

Can you provide a link to the terms under which the derived database may be used?  While the data may be extracted from open sources like SRTM, OSM operates in a region where collections of data are under copyright protection, so that a large- (or small- ) scale import or copying of this data into OSM could be problematic, given that OSM allows and encourages use far beyond educational or research purposes.

I'd be more than happy to see that the data is available under a compatible licence for any sort of use, and I just wasn't able to find that statement.  thanks
Carnildo (2020-02-14 19:54:11+00:00): Is "edifice_height" the same thing as topographic prominence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topographic_prominence)?  If so, there have been intermittent efforts to establish the tag "prominence" for that, and I recommend using it rather than something completely undocumented.
multichill (2022-03-26 18:57:31+00:00): Are you sure this is not used? I see a time table at https://www.ter.sncf.com/medias/PDF/nouvelle_aquitaine/Affiche%2023%20Limoges%20Brive_MAJ_08_02_tcm78-217207_tcm78-233172.pdf
viloan (2020-02-12 15:47:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
archie (2020-02-12 16:28:09+00:00): Hej, jag har ändrat name. Det finns regler ang name, se: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
eggie (2020-02-12 18:27:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Ik heb even office=company toegevoegd. 
Alleen een naam doet niet veel in OSM.

MVG,
Eggie
Albers Advies (2020-02-13 07:37:08+00:00): Dank voor jouw reactie, de aanpassing en het welkomstbericht. Ik ga de informatie doornemen en bij vragen zoek ik hulp op het forum.
Vriendelijke groet, Guido
englu (2020-06-16 08:23:34+00:00): According to Polish Geoportal data and the latest measurement Skopiec elevations is 718.6. Please do not change it to 724 - this value is incorrect.
mueschel (2020-02-15 11:23:40+00:00): Hi,
I found several ways with a 'ZS' tag - this is not used in any other place, what does it mean?

Thanks!
🚂🚂🚂 (2020-02-14 03:05:23+00:00): Warum verklebst du eigentlich Landuses mit Straßen?
Pathumthani (2020-02-15 02:23:07+00:00): Antwort hast Du per Message bekommen!