piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2024-01-02 09:51:23+00:00): en nog eentje
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145788978#map=17/51.55180/4.83455

Groet
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
AnnaCatarina (2024-10-19 10:08:10+00:00): Hello Martin,
can You check, why the lake Vitträsket is covered with forest and not excepted from the surrounding forest like Björnbergstjärnen? I do not get the clue, what is wrong with the tagging of the area.
Martin Långström (2024-10-19 16:22:57+00:00): I don´t know why. It looks correct, but it shows it wrong.
zluuzki (2022-04-18 17:31:12+00:00): Wrong account, sorry.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-25 22:03:03+00:00): Hola, Aquí la etiqueta de wikidata debe ponerse si trata sobre el monumento, cuando se va a poner el valor sobre la persona debe de ser subject:wikidata, lo mismo para wikipedia.
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SK53 (2023-09-09 14:12:39+00:00): Hi,

The paths over Frenni Fach look rather narrow for bridleways. Are these actually in use by riders?

Regards,

Jerry aka SK53
Guy Evans (2023-09-09 14:38:58+00:00): The way changed in this specific changeset is definitely a track (and a public bridleway).

The other paths over the Frenni Fach are not public rights of way.  They are of varying width.  As the ground is gorse/heather I'm not sure there is a minimum width needed for horses?  I'm not there often, but from memory at least some of the paths had evidence of horses.

Happy to be corrected.
SK53 (2023-09-09 16:44:08+00:00): Hi Guy,

Sorry if I tagged the wrong changeset: the public bridleway is absolutely fine. It's the paths mapped as bridleways through the heather that concern me. I presume this is open access land which is why there are now so many paths, but that doesn't confer automatic rights for riders. 

I'm not sure if there's a simple way to change these (short of going there and establishing which paths are suitable for riders). At present they allow walkers anyway, riders and cyclists will just have to be cautious. I'll ask around to see if anyone else has encountered this scenario (I've done a bit on a grassy common in Berkshire where some paths were mown for riders).

Unfortunately, although I have friends in the area it's a very long time since I visited.

Jerry
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-08 05:50:32+00:00): Hi, ein surface fine_gravel ist nach meinem Verständnis kein grade1.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131287715 Bitte um Korrektur.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 18:16:35+00:00): There is no such thing as Rue Tshakape, it was always Rue Tshakapesh according to the street sign that i read while driving through the community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 18:17:45+00:00): A lot of streets in Unamen Shipu were alien and incorrectly named, none of the street names matched the ones on the street signs.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
AndersAndersson (2022-04-19 21:09:06+00:00): Ett "s" för mycket?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1636250115
zvenzzon (2022-04-20 07:33:49+00:00): tack
Layft Greater (2024-08-30 06:04:49+00:00): Hello whatmeinfallible!

I was wondering why you have added two nodes both uncontrolled and traffic_signals crossings in like 1 meter from each other?

The problem is now solved

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9675112448
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8940645939
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
LaniusCollurio (2022-04-20 06:03:11+00:00): Ciao! Tutto bene? Ho qualche dubbio su questa aggiunta. Le vie dei casali di Zubiena non mi sembra abbiano nome. Credo siano tutti place. Mi sbaglio? (ho visto che tu hai solo corretto uno sbaglio, solo che prima di scrivere anche a Ivan volevo confrontarmi)
Andrea Musuruane (2022-04-20 07:26:49+00:00): Ciao. Io ho corretto solo perché la modifica fatta non era completa/coerente. Se ritieni che quanto inserito da Ivan non sia corretto, commenta pure il changeset  #119860457. Ciao, Andrea
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
silversurfer83 (2022-04-18 19:46:04+00:00): Hi there
are you sure that there is absolutely no trace of a path left? Or ist it maybe just hard to navigate it? If there is still a hint of a path, please consider retagging in the future before deleting. The Wiki has a lot of useful hints on how to tag paths that are barely there. 
My favorite is this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Hope I could help
happy mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
glamdring (2022-04-20 03:50:41+00:00): Hi urbanworkbench.  It looks like over the course of your edits you removed a lot of highway=track and highway=path tags from these ways.  Do you mind if I add them back in?  This area is not exclusively used for skiing, so having the large tracks mapped appropriately is good.  I did a bunch of work on the Nordic Trails a few months ago to get them into a workable shape, although there are a lot of tagging improvements (highway=path, bicycle=yes, foot=yes, mtb:scale:imba=___, etc.) and single track improvements that can (and should) be made to the area.  On a related note, for mountain bike trails, it is recommended to use highway=path, not highway=cycleway - see here for an explanation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

I'll add the missing tags back in a few days, unless there is some extra info that I am missing here (please feel free and inform me - I am always happy to learn!).

Thanks for working on the OpenStreetMap project!
highflyer74 (2022-04-19 09:23:36+00:00): Moin! Im Bereich der Sportanlage sind ein paar Dinge durcheinander geraten. Es gibt (unnötige) MP Relationen, wo sich Elemente selbst überschneiden und auch sonst recht viele nicht konsistente Linienführungen. Damit es nachfolgende Mapper leichter haben, würde ich empfehlen, immer darauf zu achten, dass die Linien nachvollziehbar verlaufen. Soll heißen: ich würde es vermeiden, dass sich Linien überschneiden, oder an einigen Stellen mit anderen verbunden sind, an anderen dann aber nicht. Auch ist unklar, warum der Weg im südlichen Teil durch diesen Zaun verläuft (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051014530).

Ich hab' ein bisschen dran herumgeschraubt und die groben Fehler (die nicht alle durch dich entstanden sind) gefixt. Vielleicht könntest Du beim Zaun nochmal nachsehen.

Geniesse die Sonne und Gruß aus HB!
osmsh (2022-04-21 19:42:09+00:00): Die Sportanlage wird derzeit noch erweitert, ich rechne mit baldiger Fertigstellung. Dann wird es neue/andere Wege hindurch geben, die dann nachtrage. Der südlich Weg ist durch einen Zaun (ohne Tor) endgültig versperrt. Es wird wohl nur zwei Zugänge geben, das sind die Lücken im Zaun (derzeit per Bauzaun verschlossen), aber es ist noch nicht klar, ob später public oder private access. Gibt dann auch neue Wege, die derzeit in Bau sind.
Mein Anliegen war eigentlich erst mal nur, den Zaun zu dokumentieren und den neuen Sportplatz (dessen Verwendung für welche Sportart mir noch nicht klar ist.)
nurdafur (2024-04-24 11:08:47+00:00): Hallo Andy

Ich bin beim auf die Karte schauen zufällig über eine Schutzhütte gestolpert. Du hast in diesem Changeset diverse Tags bei der Hütte am Hagen ergänzt. In der Note schreibst du da offene Schutzhütte mit Sitzbank.
Sollte die Hütte entsprechend nicht besser als amenity=shelter und shelter_type=weather_shelter oder ähnliches markiert werden?

Liebe Grüsse und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren
Urs
eggie (2022-04-18 19:35:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
DanGlover (2022-05-25 21:45:55+00:00): Hi Yorvik Prestigitator -

I checked this location back in April 2021, the K6 is still present but the post box and its brick pillar are gone (replacement box opposite Elmwood Close, just east). I can double-check at some point if you have more recent information but 99% convinced it had gone...

(This reminds me, I had a plan to add Historic England references to the K6s in the area.)

Dan
Yorvik Prestigitator (2022-05-26 01:06:52+00:00): hi Dan,
thanks for noticing this, yes, you are right, I have corrected it
DaveF (2022-06-27 18:45:32+00:00): Hi
Why have you deleted valid roller_coaster=track ways & replaced them with erroneous railway tags?
SherbetS (2022-08-24 20:19:47+00:00): do you know when the trail organization plans to build the link to the state road?
DLance (2022-08-24 23:03:26+00:00): Any updates are announced on their web site (https://www.cumberlandtrail.org/).  Although I see that updates on the site are sometimes delayed
DLance (2022-08-24 23:05:14+00:00): For the Graysville Mountain Trail, the latest information is here on the site:
https://www.cumberlandtrail.org/trail-segments/laurel-snow-segment/graysville-mountain-rma-section/
DLance (2022-08-24 23:05:39+00:00): The editor reports this: "Editors Note:  The trail is very close to TN 30 at this point. Please observe the End of Trail sign. Between the sign and RT 30 is private property pending further arrangements."
legofahrrad (2022-04-24 11:35:15+00:00): Moin,
damit Poller beim Routing beachtet werden können, sollten sie Teil des Weges sein. Daher braucht man dann auch nur einen Punkt, auch wenn es mehrere Poller in echt gibt. Falls du zusätzlich noch angeben möchtest, wie viele Poller existieren (z. B. 2 wie hier) kannst du an den Node auf dem Weg noch "count=2" anhängen. Der Key ist zwar nicht im Wiki dokumentiert, wird allerdings viel verwendet.
Viele Grüße, legofahrrad
Carto_Ferret (2022-04-18 19:30:05+00:00): Also used Strava to map footways.
GinaroZ (2022-04-18 20:59:22+00:00): I wondered whether to do that or mark it as private... (in the end I did neither!)
bxl-forever (2022-04-18 20:22:46+00:00): Hello,

Are you sure this is the real name for this place?

With such a name, it won’t take a long time before people would delete this, on suspicion of abusing the map for self-promotion.
Diabolo68 (2022-04-19 10:34:39+00:00): Hello,
This is the name I have on my invoice from Booking.
Should I modify or delete this point ?
bxl-forever (2022-04-19 14:35:41+00:00): Thank for this.  Indeed, it seems to be the real name, despite the "clickbait" impression it gives.
Well, we’ll keep it, and I’ll add a note on the POI stating it’s not a mistake: that might deter other mappers from ruthlessly deleting it.
Diabolo68 (2022-04-20 05:39:09+00:00): OK thanks
tuttiton (2022-04-19 23:23:02+00:00): Hello Halfdeaf007,
one way part of East Malcolm X street was disconnected from the Aurelis road after the latest construction on the site
see discussion based on the survey
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119520515
Please revert the change
baumann3141 (2022-04-20 02:47:45+00:00): Please revert your changes, previous edits were just done a few days ago and reflect reality. Aerial images are out of date. Please check before deleting/changing recent edits! Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119875729
Halfdeaf007 (2022-04-21 15:59:06+00:00): Sorry, about that. I went and revert the changes. So I  don't know for sure it got fix back to old one. Thank you and sorry!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119875729
tuttiton (2022-04-21 21:15:03+00:00): Not sure I understand, I still see the connection in iD editor. did you requested the reversion of the changeset? That's fine too but deleting the connection by hand would be enough, I'd say.
baumann3141 (2022-04-22 02:54:55+00:00): Yes it can be fixed easily, it's a very small edit. I don't see that it has been fixed yet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119875729
sanch3z (2022-04-18 20:01:43+00:00): Hallo,
mir ist aufgefallen, dass die Gehwege, die du einträgst, bereits auf den zugehörigen Straßen mittels sidewalk=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sidewalk) erfasst sind. Wenn du die Gehsteige separat erfassen willst, dann passe bitte den sidewalk-tag auf den Straßen an. Bitte achte außerdem darauf, dass die Gehwege mit den Straßen-Knoten verbunden sind, um ein sinnvolles Routing zu ermöglichen. Um Häuser abzuzeichnen würde ich die Bavaria (80 cm) Karte empfehlen. Die Satellitenkarte von Bing ist weder georeferenziert noch orthogonalisiert, was die Darstellung verzerrt.
sanch3z (2022-04-18 20:04:02+00:00): Außdem, bitte beachte die Warnungen vom OSM-Editor iD. Danke!