piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2019-06-29 08:37:50+00:00): Hallo b*k*,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz diese Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4168946/history mit type=multipolygon neu angelegt, welche dann von kartler175 auf type=site abgeändert wurde.
Im OSM-Inspector wird ein Hinweis "ways_without_tags" angezeiugt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.46421&lat=47.85555&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways,ways_without_tags
Ich meine, daß für das Sportgelände gar keine Relation erforderlich ist, sondern die Merkmale am Umriß eingetragen werden sollten.
Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380420692#map=17/48.15175/9.62292
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
user_70413 (2019-07-02 10:10:38+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
habe das Sportgelände entsprechend geändert. Weiß auch nicht mehr, warum ich das damals als MP angelegt habe. Vermeide eigentliche MPs so gut es geht.
Gruß Bernhard
tuxayo (2014-11-06 16:26:43+00:00): ERREUR sur les infos du changeset après une fausse manip à l'upload.
description: FR:Marseille: 6me: Boulevard Notre-Dame: Ajout numéro 72 + ajout relation associated street
source: survey + cadastre 2014
Nakaner (2014-11-28 20:15:06+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27098350. Siehe auch http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=28216
SomeoneElse (2014-11-12 10:31:38+00:00): I notice that you've joined a footpath and bridleway here.  What is the source for this?  The footpath was "source=npe", meaning that it was copied from an old map.  Are you sure that it still exists?
Rub21 (2014-11-17 18:44:43+00:00): hello, I fixed it, i think it doesn't exist the footway, the data is from 2009 and the images bing are more recently
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26849654
SomeoneElse (2014-11-17 18:55:44+00:00): Thanks - the data for the footway's actually from around 1950, not 2009! (it's source=npe).  I'll close http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/236762 and create another one the other side of Hungerhill Lane, suggesting that a survey is done there.

In situations such as this it's really not helpful to edit OSM to try and "fix" errors - they need an on-the ground survey, and one way of targetting where to survey is where QA sites list errors.  Hiding these errors from QA sites makes it more difficult to correct the data _properly_.

I would definitely suggest using OSM notes in situations such as this.
RichC13 (2019-09-22 13:38:29+00:00): Is this discussion still open? I have been here on the ground and the (green) stretch of footpath Hungerhill Lane - Nottingham Road is a narrow bridleway between hedges. It links to the footpath and bridleway as shown at the S end.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-22 22:31:26+00:00): Hi RichC13 (and welcome to OSM!),

Yes, people who've commented previously on this changeset will get emailed any new messages added.  It sounds like the edit is OK.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2014-11-12 10:28:13+00:00): Would it be possible to use a more communicative changeset comment than "modified railway"?  There are 5 ways in the changeset, and they're all railways, so "modified railway" doesn't tell anyone anything.

Useful information would include details of the survey that you performed prior to the edit, other data sources used, etc/
Nakaner (2014-11-28 20:14:55+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27098350. Siehe auch http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=28216
wiedergaenger (2014-11-07 09:00:12+00:00): testig
GerdP (2015-10-27 19:05:28+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=tour is rather unusal
and doesn't inform about the used vehicle. It is also not understood by the renderer.
The comment mentions a "mountain footpath",
so I assume they are all highway=path
See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
Please try to provide more info, e.g. if bicycle traffic is allowed.
peternik99 (2015-10-29 06:28:51+00:00): Actually I needed a tag that will not be rendered, because these are paths that I intent to survey in the future. I have a special mkgmap style that displays them as red-white lines on my Garmin GPS map. If you think that this is a problem I can delete them.
GerdP (2015-10-29 08:31:51+00:00): reg. Garmin: I prefer to load planned tour data as gpx files (track, not route) . You can give them different colours, I use that to separate between "done" and "to-do".
Reg. OSM : If you think that these ways may not exist in reality, yes, please remove them or change the highway tag to a note which you can still identify in mkgmap style. Make sure to update the data when the survey is done. OK?
peternik99 (2015-10-29 08:43:29+00:00): OK. I will check at them and delete or re-tag as needed.
GerdP (2015-10-29 08:45:20+00:00): great :-)
dieterdreist (2015-11-18 21:29:03+00:00): suspicious changeset. Contains a lot of deletions.
trigpoint (2014-11-07 09:17:04+00:00): Is there really a sign saying 'Boothby Road shared use path', sounds more like a description than a name.
GerdP (2022-08-01 15:23:04+00:00): Moin!
Ich kann hier keine Brücke erkennen:
https://www.osm.org/way/311448087
Ich denke aber, dass ich etwa 3 m östlich da ein Rohr sehe, also sind die Seen wohl eher mit Dükern verbunden?
letihu (2022-08-01 20:05:37+00:00): Ja, dass stimmt. Vor 7 Jahren war ich nicht besser. Dann bau den See und den Weg mal um ;-)
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-06 23:53:57+00:00): Proszę:
a) kalibrować podkład Binga lub rysować z Geoportalu,
b) poprawnie adresować budynki w miejscowościach bez nazwanych ulic: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-06 23:55:00+00:00): c) nie rysować budynków większych niż są w rzeczywistości.
5m4u9 (2014-11-07 06:32:42+00:00): Thanks for contributing! Every saturday we meet on HackLab (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2710181931) and helps all to use/contribute OpenStreetMap. You are wellcome!
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:55:22+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311461949
has no tags. What is it?
nomisonson (2017-03-27 11:02:33+00:00): Changed it, according to bing satellite maps i think it is a greenhouse
flohoff (2014-11-07 17:54:19+00:00): Hi,

ich würde es preferieren wenn auf den roundabound/junctions keine refs und names sind. Das sind refs und names des KREISVERKEHRS nicht der Straße. Der Kreisverkehr ist ja nicht die eine Straße sondern die Kreuzung. 

Hier in D mag das unüblich sein aber in UK haben Kreisverkehre typischerweise eigennamen und refs die nicht denen der Straßen entsprechen. 

Auch wenn JOSM den Weg des Kreisverkehrs ohne ref/name als Fehler meldet.
flohoff (2014-11-07 18:00:35+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout

"A roundabout should only be tagged with name=* if the junction itself is named independently and differently from the roads crossing it. "

Dasselbe sollte für ref= gelten da es sich ja auch auf die Kreuzung nicht den Weg bezieht.
Nakaner (2015-06-30 15:48:11+00:00): Warum hast du die S 3 Hattigen (Ruhr) Mitte–Oberhausen Hbf mit service=regional getaggt? 20-Minuten-Takt (bzw. 30 Min. am Wochenende), dichte Haltestellenabstände und das Nichtabwarten von Anschlüssen (Prinzip einer S-Bahn) rechtfertigt für mich service=commuter. (Ich habe das zufällig entdeckt)
drolbr_mdv (2015-07-01 06:18:11+00:00): Wenn das Service-Tag mal ordentlich dokumentiert (mindestens auf wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:route=train und wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:service) und diskutiert wird, hänge ich nicht an bestimmten Werten.

Eine Anschlussbindung gibt es übrigens in NRW-Nahverkehr grundsätzlich nicht mehr, und 20'/30'-Takte, oft auch durch parallele Linien, sind eher die Regel als die Ausnahme.

Auch das "S" im Namen ist Marketing, keine technische Abgrenzung. So ist z.B. die RB47 nach S7 bei gleichem Angebot umbenannt worden, und die RB25 wird in Köln als S-Bahn behandelt.
Nakaner (2015-07-01 17:19:27+00:00): Ja, eigentlich hast du Recht. Die Abgrenzungen sind schwammig. Es gibt S-Bahn-Linien (z.B. S 5), deren Wagenmaterial man komfortabel nennen kann (Grinsekatzen), und RB-/RE-Linien, deren Wagenmaterial eher die Bezeichnung S-Bahn (BR 425/Quietschie) verdient hätte, z.B. RE 8 Mönchengladbach–Koblenz.

Ich werde daher nichts an den Routen ändern und habe eine Diskussion auf meiner ToDo-Liste notiert.
Jward101 (2014-11-08 14:27:04+00:00): Nice one barbatalice.  Keep mapping your area!
mavl (2014-11-07 14:03:41+00:00): Нельзя обозначать биатлонное стрельбище как leisure=pitch. Это ни в коем случае не спортивная площадка.
mavl (2014-11-07 16:04:35+00:00): Биатлонное стрельбище в Заводоуковске переобозначено:

biathlon:targets=30
description=Биатлонное стрельбище
landuse=shooting_range
shooting=biathlon
SomeoneElse (2014-11-13 17:56:16+00:00): A loading gauge wasn't set on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60163882/history but now is following merge with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311506937/history .  Is it correct?
luschi (2015-01-06 01:05:17+00:00): level=1 und level=2 auf den hier von dir bearbeiteten Wegen ist falsch.
Bitte lesen und richtig stellen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level
rickmastfan67 (2014-11-16 10:24:42+00:00): With relation 4171452, are you sure that's a 'no left turn' and not a 'no U-turn' restriction?  Just doesn't seem to be correct to me.
abbafei (2014-11-16 21:04:19+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up! changed it.
lezurdis (2014-11-07 12:07:31+00:00): Bem vindo ao OSM :-)

Não sei se estas a vontade em português por isso vou continuar em francês.

La classification highway=road est une classification temporaire, à utiliser uniquement lorsque l'on dessine à partir des images aérienne. Ce n'est donc pas une classification valide pour qualifier une route.
La classification la plus faible pour une route carrossable c'est justement highway=unclassified

- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=road

- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=unclassified

Donc la classification n'est pas correct sur :

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124365641/history

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136183508/history

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136183507/history

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168286029/history
berndw (2014-11-07 16:38:27+00:00): Mit diesem Changeset hast Du zum zweiten Mal den Wald unsichtbar gemacht.
Bitte etwas mehr Vorsicht.
Ich werde das jetzt noch mal fixen
HoSp (2014-11-07 17:31:31+00:00): Uuups, aber dort ist doch 'ne Kiesgrube ...
Hab ich wohl was falsch gemacht.
Werd' ich nicht mehr anfassen. Sorry!
berndw (2014-11-07 17:52:28+00:00): Es geht nicht um die vorhandene Kiesgrube, sondern darum das Dein verwendeter Editor Potlatch bei Multipolygon-Relationen aufgeschmissen ist ;-)
Versuch doch mal JOSM
Nur ein Tipp
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-23 21:22:13+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/130807730/history has MP=10.43 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
tbicr (2024-02-24 21:43:05+00:00): hey, in this changeset `MP =10.43` changed to `MP=10.43` as trailing whitespaces looks invalid for keys

`MP ` key where added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21899770
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-25 05:47:24+00:00): Oops, asked there
trigpoint (2014-11-07 10:28:38+00:00): Have the waste bins and memorial been removed here, you have ddeleted a lot of stuff. Why?
Please add meaningful changeset comments
EdLoach (2014-11-07 10:54:04+00:00): Selina93 - I'm going to undo this changeset as it also includes the Norwich place node, and undeleting isn't something that is easy for new editors. I hope you don't mind. If the other items have actually been removed and need deleting I'm afraid it means you'll need to do them again, though, sorry.
EdLoach (2014-11-07 10:59:33+00:00): I have left the Guildhall Undercroft mosaic node that you added though.
maning (2014-11-07 16:51:06+00:00): Just to point out that some of the buildings I created here based on ARC's survey point gpx maybe too small for the average building size.  Will update this later.  SOrry for that.
naoliv (2014-11-07 11:29:00+00:00): Glauco, procure utilizar sempre o nome completo da rua. Por exemplo, coloque "Rua Dalto" ao invés de abreviar para "R. Dalto"
Glauco Silva (2014-11-07 11:40:52+00:00): Ok. Já ajustei!

Obrigado!
SomeoneElse (2014-11-17 13:32:28+00:00): Is "Greno Wood (Nature Reserve)" really the name of this?  If it is actually a nature reserve, perhaps a leisure=nature_reserve tag would make sense?
CloCkWeRX (2016-01-08 02:43:45+00:00): There's a couple of routing errors with this one; like http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=71074868 - could you take a bit of a look?
SomeoneElse (2014-11-13 18:02:30+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98459676/history was not previously cutting=yes but now is as a result of a merge with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32945834/history .  Is this correct or does this change need undoing?
SomeoneElse (2014-11-13 19:29:52+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98459702/history was also not previously cutting=yes but got merged into http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98459611
SomeoneElse (2014-11-13 19:30:37+00:00): Similarly http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98459718/history
mentor (2014-11-11 02:14:25+00:00): Hi,

These edits seem to be tests or imaginary. Please be aware that your edits are taking place on the sole live map which is relied upon by many people for real life tasks.

I have gone ahead and removed them.
*Martin* (2016-07-13 20:32:19+00:00): Ahoj. Ked pridat nejaku amenity na budovu ako bod, tak uz prosim ta tu budovu netaguj rovnako lebo potom je to 2x. Opravujem.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-18 20:34:27+00:00): Er - was the deletion of the "Lindsey Trail" in this changeset deliberate? (see http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3297503 )
SomeoneElse (2014-11-18 20:36:56+00:00): Ah!  I see.  It got merged into http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3297504
jumbanho (2014-11-08 12:12:10+00:00): Nice Work!  Welcome to OSM.
marc__marc (2020-05-06 09:12:18+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3172448342
what's the meaning of the safety=life_bouy ?
Regards,
Marc
kevjs1982 (2020-05-06 09:22:44+00:00): It's a life ring, changed to emergency=life_ring
marc__marc (2020-05-06 09:32:27+00:00): thanks
marc__marc (2020-05-06 09:44:34+00:00): this one too https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3172448311 ?
benediktg (2014-11-07 16:11:15+00:00): war noch nicht eingetragen
eggie (2020-02-23 22:01:25+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog  .. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
gormur (2021-09-24 11:12:13+00:00): Lenge siden, men husker du hva du mente med å tagge Problemveien med note=two separate lanes ?
Turleder'n (2021-09-28 20:07:03+00:00): Regner med at dette allerede sto der da jeg gjorde endringer. Mulig at dette gjalt i første omgang kun den delen av veien ved Gaustadalléen. Problemveien ble jo forandret flere ganger ila. de siste årene. Kommentaren kan fjernes.
SammysHP (2014-11-30 08:52:31+00:00): Moin, schau dir mal bitte http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/165083 an. Vielleicht kann die Note jetzt geschlossen werden.
iWowik (2014-12-04 07:24:36+00:00): Вы когда place на точке НП меняеете, не забывайте поменять и на границе
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1300412827
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114918163
SomeoneElse (2014-11-18 10:51:43+00:00): It'd be really helpful if you could use a changeset comment that's a bit more meaningful than "Fix".  With a deleted relation, there's no bounding box stored with the changeset, so it appears both "nowhere and "everywhere".

In this case how about something like "deleted right turn restriction after checking that you are allowed to turn right here" (or whatever you actually did)?
naoliv (2014-11-07 17:10:12+00:00): arabez, apesar de já existir essa área residencial, o uso dela não é muito correta.
A cidade não é composta 100% de área residencial, mas também possui área comercial, industrial, áreas de lazer, gramados, etc.
jakub-- (2014-11-24 16:37:53+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for your contributions! For future reference, please use the "Area" tool for tracing buildings rather than "Line". You can classify them as just "Building" to start with. Regards, Jakub.
Minh Nguyen (2014-11-09 05:27:00+00:00): No need to name the soccer field “Soccer Field”. Choosing the “Soccer field” option in iD adds a “sport=soccer” tag to the area. Although the main map doesn’t do anything special with “sport=soccer”, various alternative maps do. For example, once it updates to include your edit, the French OSM map at <http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=18&lat=39.38774&lon=-84.42123> will superimpose the layout of a soccer field.
Minh Nguyen (2014-11-09 05:28:46+00:00): Oh, wrong link. Here’s the soccer field: <http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=19&lat=39.38808&lon=-84.43523>.
mikolajpopielarz (2014-11-07 17:30:08+00:00): ..
lezurdis (2014-11-08 14:34:07+00:00): Viva e como é o teu primeiro changeset seja bem vindo !
Reparei que há neste changeset um way duplicado e sobreposto :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311573814
Já colocaste a rua por completo aqui :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98835849

Por isso penso que podes remover o way 311573814. Se ainda não estás confortavel com o processo de edição e prefires que eu faço é só deixar-me uma mensagem.

Se pretendias fazer outra coisa (como por exemplo partir a rua em 2 bocados) é só deixar-me uma mensagem e tentarei ajudar-te do meu melhor.
raito (2014-11-07 17:39:55+00:00): oops.. Wrong changeset comment. Correct: #26619938
lezurdis (2014-11-08 14:46:14+00:00): Olá (novamente),

Tenho uma pergunta porque acho um bocadinho estranho que a rua :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98835900

Seja de dois sentidos quando mesmo ao lado há um bocado em sentido único (oneway=yes)
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286439779

Normalemente uma rua fica com o mesmo sentido de um cruzamento até o proximo cruzamento.

E também parece-me que Andre leva um é e escreve-se André.
sdoerr (2014-11-10 20:54:49+00:00): Don't forget to change your changeset comments when you upload a new changeset!!!
sdoerr (2014-11-10 20:55:09+00:00): Don't forget to change your changeset comments when you upload a new changeset!!!
py_berrard (2019-08-18 22:38:01+00:00): pharmacie au mileu de la rue à placer correctement : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3172728732
mcld (2014-11-08 21:00:36+00:00): Hi Roger - thanks for your edits! I'd just like to point out that this long East-West road is not a "track" - if you zoom out in the aerial imagery you can see it's a moderately significant part of the road network. I'll tweak the tagging of this road. Thanks!
fabienVM (2014-12-12 19:42:33+00:00): Bonsoir.

Concernant les bretelles d'autoroute allant vers saint Grégoire, as-tu des infos sur les voies cyclables/piétons existantes ? 
En regardant le tracé sur place ce matin, elles semblent disparaître à terme.
djakk (2014-12-13 17:26:39+00:00): Salut, non pas d'infos ! J'espère qu'il y aura toujours une liaison cyclable pour faire Saint-Grégoire - Montgermont … 
Par contre je me demande si la bretelle existante sera fermée ? J'espère car ce qui bloque pour sortir d'Alphasis le soir, c'est le rond-point à 5 branches … dont une est l'actuelle bretelle. Sans ça ce projet n'a vraiment aucun intérêt ! X-(
trigpoint (2014-11-08 08:06:28+00:00): It is very unlikely that your business is located in the middle of the road, please place a node where your office/factory is physically located.
emacsen (2014-11-09 12:19:38+00:00): Paul,

Welcome to OSM! It's really great to have a new contributor on board.

Can you explain this changeset though? It appears the last 3 changes you've made (including this one) consist of nothing but a blank node.

Maybe if you explain what you were trying to do, I could help.
os-emmer (2024-02-22 16:46:51+00:00): Hallo hendrik-17,
du hast hier vor sehr langer Zeit mal ein emergency_service=mountain eingetragen. Was ist das? Wäre emergency=mountain_rescue vielleicht besser passend?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236631570
hendrik-17 (2024-02-22 17:43:28+00:00): Moin os-emmer,

dabei handelt es sich um eine Station der Bergwacht (siehe https://www.bergwacht-schwarzwald.de/wir-helfen-ihnen/ortsgruppen/muenstertal/uebersicht).

Das Tag emergency=mountain_rescue gab es damals noch nicht, inzwischen ist es im Vergleich zu emergency_service=mountain wohl wesentlich verbreiteter und auch besser dokumentiert.

(https://taghistory.raifer.tech/?#***/emergency/mountain_rescue&***/emergency_service/mountain und https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/emergency=mountain_rescue/emergency_service=mountain)

Zwischenzeitlich wurde die Bergrettungswache als Node mit diesem Tagging neu erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4834761574/.

Das veraltete und redundante Tag habe ich deshalb entfernt.

Habe das ganze aber (leider) schon länger nicht mehr vor Ort überprüfen können.
Insbesondere wäre interessant, ob die Malteser-Rettungswache (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236631572) noch existiert und die Gebäudeaufteilung noch stimmt.

Beste Grüße
hendrik-17
os-emmer (2024-02-22 18:16:41+00:00): Hallo hendrik-17,
danke für deine schnelle und detaillierte Antwort. Mit einer Vor-Ort-Kontrolle kann ich leider nicht dienen. So wie es jetzt ist, ist aber wenigstens der aktuellste bekannte Stand mit dem aktuellen Tagging-Schema erfasst.
MCDA (2014-11-08 01:03:05+00:00): I dont understand why this is tagged as commercial, these are agricultural buildings.
mcld (2014-11-08 20:35:25+00:00): Alex, thanks for your edits! A bit of feedback: I wouldn't use "track" for a road in the middle of town connecting a building to the main road. I've tweaked the road to be "residential".

More info about road tagging: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
MCDA (2014-11-08 01:02:03+00:00): Why is this tagged as an area, when it is a farm yard building of some sort?
dieterdreist (2015-11-18 21:08:28+00:00): this is a changeset consisting mostly of deletions of small wooden areas. Even after a year no alternative has been presented, so I consider this vandalism.
emacsen (2014-11-09 12:17:15+00:00): StefanR, welcome to OSM. It's great to see you editing so frequently. Could you please, when you hit Save in your editor, add a helpful comment about the change that you've made?

This will help other editors see your work and also, you can see their work based on their comments.
swun (2014-11-08 00:08:53+00:00): DRC, Baraka, #hotosm-task-748 #MissingMaps
swun (2014-11-08 00:25:59+00:00): #hotosm-task-748 #MissingMaps
U20 (2014-11-08 20:48:27+00:00): 道路の脇に置くのはplatformが正解です。
道路の脇にstop_positionを置かないでください。
swun (2014-11-08 00:24:26+00:00): #hotosm-task-748 #MissingMaps
swun (2014-11-08 00:23:56+00:00): #hotosm-task-748 #MissingMaps
swun (2014-11-08 00:22:43+00:00): #hotosm-task-748 #MissingMaps
Alan (2014-11-08 02:04:04+00:00): Hi Kurez! Thanks for tracing all those houses! After you've traced a shape, there is a tool in iD that helps you rectangularize the shapes.
Alan (2014-11-08 02:22:39+00:00): Although now I see that those are some really weird shaped houses. Not much we can do for some of them.
CloCkWeRX (2016-01-08 02:44:44+00:00): Ditto http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=71070414
woodpeck (2015-02-18 21:03:24+00:00): This changeset adds houses with a large number of very specific tags, including the name of an occupant and the number of livestock owned. This is very unusual content for OSM. Can you provide details about the project - was there some kind of consultation with the OSM community or did someone experienced with OSM suggest to add this data?
Nirab Pudasaini (2015-03-11 06:18:24+00:00): This is mapping work done by someone from Nepal Red Cross. This is not from census data , it looks like some kind of community survey done by Nepal Red Cross Society. This changeset has lots of useful information, but yes there are some tags that raise privacy concerns. It could a case of mapper not being aware of the privacy concern. This issue has been communicated to Nepal Red Cross. Will update you when we hear back from them.