piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
morenuts (2021-09-12 14:23:41+00:00): Jeg fandt det rigtige navn. Det er den her. https://goo.gl/maps/n3UZR9BptdHr2PNX9
archie (2021-09-12 14:46:46+00:00): Fint! Ändrar du navn och placera gärna noden i den byggnaden som är den rätta för restaurangen. Tack!
bingo (2025-10-06 10:46:22+00:00): deine Änderung ist zwar schon ein paar Jahre her, aber ich bin den E1 dieses Jahr an dieser Stelle gelaufen und deine Verlegung entspricht nicht dem tatsächlichen Verlauf. Der ursprüngliche Verlauf ist immer noch der aktuelle Verlauf laut Wegmarkierung.
RicoElectrico (2025-02-25 16:07:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4179342

Choć nie byłem w stanie tego potwierdzić na żadnym podkładzie jak lidar, archiwalna i aktualna ortofotomapa.
ndm (2021-09-14 10:28:10+00:00): You are changing items that are carefully surveyed - the road signs in Bristol have postcodes on them - that’s what the postal code on the road is signifying - it should be what is signed, I.e. BS9.
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-14 18:38:46+00:00): Ok, that seems to me like a partial postcode though and therefore much less useful than a full postcode
ndm (2021-09-14 22:36:50+00:00): Roads (ways) don't really have full postcodes - buildings on opposite sides can often have different full postcodes.

I'll revert.
SK53 (2021-09-15 12:14:38+00:00): Worth noting that in some places road signs will have a full postcode (providing the road is short enough to only have one). Quite common in Nottinghamshire, and perhaps elsewhere.
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-15 16:43:54+00:00): And that's why I thought it would be reasonable here as that's sometimes the case near me too and all houses on both sides have the same postcode here.
As an aside, I've used postal_code:left and :right where postcodes are different on each side

> Roads (ways) don't really have full postcodes
They don't really have part postcodes either, so I'm not sure what utility that information has, whereas a full postcode could be routed to (if that was all that was known), rather than considering all buildings with the postcode.
ndm (2021-09-15 22:45:27+00:00): If you edit roads in the City and County of Bristol and change postal_code then you need to move the signed value to an appropriate tag (signed:postal_code). Or just use addr:postcode if you really want to have the whole postcode somehow associated with the road. Otherwise there will be a loss of surveyed information and the changeset will likely get reverted.
eggie (2021-09-11 15:21:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2021-09-11 13:37:09+00:00): adjacent to Tyne Tunnel - tidying up after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110823595#map=4/62.07/12.06&layers=H revert.
Thierry1030 (2025-01-25 13:44:05+00:00): volgens deze note zou hier geen doorgang meer zijn > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4601408
Kevo (2021-09-11 21:56:06+00:00): Please stop marking the 401 areas under construction as open - they are not open.  You should only map things that exist and these do not exist yet.
Frans S (2021-09-12 10:01:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Be more accurate and square the buildings

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111063408
GerdP (2022-05-02 08:56:06+00:00): Mein Router sagt, ich kann da lang fahren.
Ist die Brücke tatsächlich noch (oder wieder) mit dem Rad befahrbar?
UdoR (2022-05-02 14:10:20+00:00): Nein derzeit ist keine Brücke vorhanden.
GerdP (2022-05-02 14:14:29+00:00): Dann werde ich mal das bicycle=yes entfernen.
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:10:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
SomeoneElse (2021-09-27 18:18:13+00:00): Whatever the source of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981991478 is it is not Bing (which is what the source tag of this changeset suggests).  Bing has 5 adjoined buildings of a different shape; this changeset just https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981991478 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981991481 .
We would need to know the source of the data to ensure that the licence under which it was made available was compatible with OSM.
SomeoneElse (2021-09-27 18:18:17+00:00): مهما كان مصدر https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981991478 ، فهو ليس Bing (وهو ما تقترحه علامة المصدر لمجموعة التغييرات هذه). يحتوي Bing على 5 مبانٍ متجاورة ذات شكل مختلف ؛ هذه التغييرات فقط https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981991478 و https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981991481.
سنحتاج إلى معرفة مصدر البيانات للتأكد من أن الترخيص الذي تم توفيرها بموجبه كان متوافقًا مع OSM.
user_11418917 (2021-09-27 19:22:47+00:00): Please read my last comment here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111668407
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:11:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
Minh Nguyen (2024-12-18 23:44:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160372474 moves this information back to the original Marion County relation; see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/incorrect-indianapolis-city-limits/122928
J-MUC (2022-05-05 08:32:02+00:00): Hello andrewpmk,

I see you are active in this area, e.g. quite recently added a note related to Palladium way. While working on that note, I saw that OSM has Palladium Way and a service road from Dundas Street to the car poll parking area running in parallel.
Would there be a way for you, based on local knowledge, to sort this out and consolidate the two ways into one (which seems to be more realistic)?
Thanks!

Kind regards,

J-MUC
J-MUC (2022-05-08 15:18:34+00:00): Hello,

My earlier comment is now obsolete. Some CSs were reverted, removing the duplication. Just joined Palladium Way to existing parking access path coming from Dundas Street, avoiding the duplication.
Street names and highway types to be sorted out eventually, once the Jersey barrier gets removed, allowing passage on Palladium from Northern part of Palladium Way all the way to Dundas Street.
meinmap (2021-09-11 22:28:04+00:00): Grazie ancora per avermi corretto gli errori e per avermeli spiegati
emvee (2021-09-11 15:01:21+00:00): Iets vreemds gebeurd in deze changeset, ben het aan het nakijken...
emvee (2021-09-11 15:14:15+00:00): Hoe het precies gebeurd was is me niet duidelijk maar probleem gerepareerd in changeset 111066595
Ben Dezar 2 (2021-09-12 16:12:41+00:00): To takie się uliczki na MOP-ach daje?
adamsc (2021-09-13 10:56:32+00:00): Drogi na MOPach to highway=service a nie motorway_link
literan (2021-09-13 19:43:55+00:00): "Пресса", "Мороженое", "Чулки-носки дешево", "Разливное и бутылочное пиво" и т.п. это не названия. Не стоит вносить текст с вывесок в поле name

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE 

см. тут и ниже
Larmax (2021-09-11 16:38:44+00:00): Hei, paikalla oli jo rakennus, miksi lisäsit sen päälle toisen?
plahti (2021-09-11 18:58:23+00:00): Parkkihallissa olevat väylä (vasemmanpuoleinen) oli tarkoitus saada  piiloon. Tuo "rakennus" on autojhallin betonikansi. Säädin myös leveleitä ja layereitä, ei auttanut.
Larmax (2021-09-12 08:30:52+00:00): OSM:ssä on käytössä "Don't tag for the renderer" -käytäntö: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer Eli vaikka parkkilahllin väylät näkyvisivät mielestäsi väärin, karttalle ei tulisi lisätä mitään ylimääräistä niiden piilottamiseksi. Se, että väylät näkyy on karttarenderöinin (tässä tapauksessa carton) ongelma, ei itse karttadatan.
mueschel (2021-09-13 09:58:24+00:00): Hi,
"alt_housenumber" is not used in other places.
There's a rather common way to tag alternate addresses using
addr2:housenumber

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr2%3Ahousenumber#chronology
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Mike Baggaley (2021-12-06 16:04:21+00:00): Hi, way 775601796 has been tagged as a river, but it seems unlikely to be one to me. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
DaveF (2022-01-26 04:49:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775601796/history
Please revert.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-15 15:17:10+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,

warum verwendest du immer nur das generische Changeset-Kommentar "Verbesserungen"?

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
Shaun das Schaf (2021-09-15 08:58:49+00:00): Hallo ChriMaMo,

auf diesem Straßenabschnitt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173411328 waren bereits vor deiner Änderung für beide Fahrtrichtungen getrennte Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen eingetragen ("maxspeed:backward=100" und "maxspeed:forward=70").

Du hast jetzt eine allgemeingültige Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung gesetzt ("maxspeed=100").

Weißt du was davon jetzt stimmt? Es sollte immer nur entweder "maxspeed" oder "maxspeed:forward/backward" genutzt werden, nicht beides zusammen.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
ChriMaMo (2021-09-15 09:17:20+00:00): Hallo,
Auf dieser Strecke gilt 100kmh.
Wohne hier und fahr die Strecke öfters.
Bin neu hier, und hoffe, dass ich es richtig eingetragen habe. 
Es gilt definitiv 100 km/h. 
Gruß
Christian
Shaun das Schaf (2021-09-15 09:48:45+00:00): Hallo Christian, danke für die Info.

Bitte entferne dann noch die beiden Tags "maxspeed:backward=100" und "maxspeed:forward=70", damit auch wirklich nur das von dir gesetzte "maxspeed=100" ausgewertet wird.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
stigar (2021-09-11 23:52:36+00:00): Hur menade du här? bicycle=yes och horse=yes är väl knappast implicita i highway=path?
archie (2021-09-12 00:16:28+00:00): Inte det? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Interpretation. Då får du vara konsekvent och ange motorcar=yes, motor_vehicle=yes, , hgv=yes etc vid highway=unclassified m m.
stigar (2021-09-12 06:55:21+00:00): Tack för länken!

Ingressen säger "Note that explicit tagging of access repeating what following tables imply may be still useful. For example bare highway=path may mean either "surveyed and all defaults apply" or "mapped from LIDAR, not surveyed, may be private". In contrast highway=path + foot=yes + bicycle=yes is more clear what is its meaning."

Den beskriver att vad som står där är "fallback behavior" när ingen information ges. Inget förbjuder mer information.

Här är det definitivt användbart för att skilja från en enkel skogsstig, som i praxis bara taggas highway=path.
iey6Om7C (2021-09-11 16:31:49+00:00): За́мок в промзоне, серьезно? :)
user_125718 (2022-12-03 20:03:32+00:00): Hallo momabebra,
es ist ja gut, daß du so viel landuse mappst, aber natural=grassland (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982018794) gibt es nicht in Berlin, daß sind natürliche Landschaften, wo das Klima zu trocken ist, so daß sich dort höhere Pflanzen wie Bäume nicht entwickeln können.

Für angelegte oder entstandene kleine Grasflächen ist es deshalb besser diese mit landuse=grass oder wenn es größere natürliche Wiesen sind (da sollten dann zumindest höhere Gräser wachsen, weil sie meist nur selten gemäht wird), mit landuse=meadow zu taggen. Würden natürliche Weisen gar nicht gemäht oder wenigstens von Busch- und Baumbewuchs freigehalten, würden sie über lange Zeit mit Sträuchern und Bäumen zuwachsen.

Gruß
Fabian
user_125718 (2022-12-04 01:33:27+00:00): Das Problem hat sich als generell erwiesen und wird im Forum diskutiert:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/das-grasland-von-berlin/6313
Allroads (2023-01-31 15:40:35+00:00): Hoi Jeroen,
Ik kom er achter dat overtaking:agricultural=yes niet klopt.
Want het zegt, dat agricultural wel mag overtaken bij yes, dus inhalen, verkeersbord F1 met onderbord uitgezonderd tractorsymbool, zegt juist dat alle andere de tractor mogen inhalen.

verkeersbord F3
overtaking:hgv=no zegt juist, dat de vrachtwagen niet mag inhalen, Alle andere mag iedereen inhalen.
Hoe het dan wel moet daar twijfel ik over.
Belangrijkste is dan overtaking=no
Wat dan voor het onderbord, dat is de vraag.
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.411838113&lng=4.935683012&z=17

overtaking=no,maar dan moet de except nog worden uitgedrukt.

Bij restriction hebben we een except key 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=715383#p715383
JeroenvanderGun (2023-01-31 20:13:59+00:00): Je hebt technisch gelijk, maar ik ken ook geen alternatieve tagging en praktisch zal elke dataconsument wel snappen wat er met overtaking:agricultural bedoeld wordt.
JeroenvanderGun (2023-01-31 20:16:14+00:00): except bij Relation:restriction slaat ook op het voertuig waarvoor het verbod wel/niet geldt en niet op een ander voertuig in de omgeving.
Allroads (2023-01-31 22:19:43+00:00): Als het niet correct is, kunnen we het beter verwijderen, dacht ik, ik had het ook zo gezet totdat ik echt over na ging denken ...

ik dacht nog aan
overtaking=no @ (except;agricultural) of zoiets, dit is niet correct, een conditional is het ook niet, bij zo'n toevoeging zal dan de werking voor andere wel goed gaan? de overtaking=no voor de andere onwerkbaar maakt, dat vroeg ik mij af. Dat wil je niet.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qQ0
Zat te zoeken bij except in de value bij een highway.
Zie dan vooral een note, fixme, description met except in de omschrijving.
Misschien is dat beter met een note.
zag
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352397703
restriction=no_left_turn + except=bus
zou die + werken, vroeg ik mij af

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239853325
traffic_sign:forward = PL:B-2,"except taxis"

Lastig.

overtaking:except=yes @(agricultural)
? 

Ik het wel zo iets beter een note, of verzonnen nieuwe tag dan een verkeerde.
Allroads (2023-02-01 00:37:21+00:00): Zocht nog op except in de key
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80431199
parking:lane:both:except=bus
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53208883

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7126667
maxweight:except = psv

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579798186
parking:condition:right:except = residents

Nederland
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7126667
except=bicycle
JeroenvanderGun (2023-02-02 20:15:04+00:00): Ik zie op taginfo dat overtaking=agricultural soms wordt gebruikt; dat lijkt me op zich een prima oplossing.

Ik was overigens niet de eerste die overtaking:agricultural=yes gebruikte, dus waarschijnlijk kun je de tagging op meer plaatsen verbeteren.