piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
seattlefyi (2022-10-04 15:31:21+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the helpful edit! I just randomly saw your change, and went ahead and expanded the "NE" to "Northeast" (which is the norm) and also added that to the street nearby. Thanks again!
clayjarhan (2022-10-04 16:09:44+00:00): Here in Albuquerque, the city is divided into four quadrants, and all streets have NE, NW, SE, or SW at the end of the name.  I would understand it'd be a norm to fully type out the abbreviations elsewhere, but here in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, it is norm NOT to expand the abbreviations because they are on every street name.  Would it be all right to follow the local convention, or is the full expansion of abbreviation more encouraged on OSM?
clayjarhan (2022-10-04 16:10:39+00:00): I now see that NE/NW/SE/SW are not used in abbreviated form on OSM for Albuquerque.  Please ignore my comment above.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-22 16:58:55+00:00): Ciao. Il sentiero 8 era già presente (in parte) nella relazione 11519295. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 12:13:32+00:00): è giusto anche questo (una piccola parte in mezzo soltanto, ma c'era), ho unificato le relazioni, grazie.
nevw (2022-10-04 20:04:28+00:00): Hi, this is already mapped   
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297738564#map=18/-41.45708/147.14352
nevw (2022-10-04 20:08:52+00:00): I have reverted this duplicate mapping
mavl (2023-06-21 16:01:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
eggie (2022-10-05 10:33:33+00:00): Dag Will   De zelftap staat al ingetekend.
Zelfbediening hoort niet op de kaart. 
Loods als naam hoort niet op de kaart.
Iets beschrijven doe je niet met name=...

Voor een boerderijwinkel is een aparte tag. Kijk steeds in de wiki.
Ik haal de namen even weg. 
Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfarm


MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-05 10:41:36+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine
Aangepast aan wiki..

De naam melktab is al twijfelachtig.
Wanneer het de naam is oke..  wanneer je iets beschrijft de naam verwijderen. 
Maar even kijken of het rendert.
shop=farm is ook nog een mogelijkheid. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-10-05 10:43:43+00:00): Wanneer het niet rendert dan shop=farm
vending_machine=yes
vending=milk
eggie (2022-10-05 14:04:35+00:00): aangepast
Richard (2022-11-08 09:16:30+00:00): Hi - what's your source for the Hallaton-Horninghold path allowing bikes? This is a public footpath (or at least it was when I lived nearby!) and so bikes aren't permitted unless by explicit permission of the landowner.
user_5359 (2022-10-06 06:57:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/changeset/127003258 (one of seventy objects). What is the meaning of the foreign tags
Commune = MUSUSA
Quartier = Katwa
Salle = Alpha-job
X = 756301
Y = 10754
Z = 1768
? What is the source of this information?
ququruzka (2022-10-07 16:57:35+00:00): Будь ласка, не перейменувуйте вулиці іншими мовами, окрім української. 
наступні подібні зміни будуть розцінені як вандалізм і ваші дані будуть видалені. 
значення в тегах name=* і nam:uk=* 
повинні  бути однаковими .
ququruzka (2022-10-21 10:46:46+00:00): Чекаємо відповіді
Sander H (2022-10-04 17:51:17+00:00): Please don't trust BRT background map too much on the BAG viewer (it might be correct, but isn't always), road name was correct based on NWB data (which was based on BAG according to the source there).
Someone already reverted your change.
VLD548 (2022-10-10 10:44:41+00:00): I agree. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:27:16+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127133617
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:27:41+00:00): Hi.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
bxl-forever (2022-10-04 19:52:18+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for providing the full name and some tags.

I added a link to the etymology: it might help in case other mappers would believe it is "Jacques" instead.

I saw in your latest contributions that you are filling the postcodes and cities names on objects.  I want to inform you this is not necessary in most countries (e.g. Belgium) because those are already obtained through existing zones.  And on this object, no address is necessary at all because the POI is located within a building that has a single address.

Hope this helps.  Happy mapping!
AlexBrd (2022-10-05 10:27:36+00:00): Hello, 
Thank you for your comment and the link.  Ok, I didn't know for the adresses on POI and post codes, thank you also for the info:) 
Have a nice day!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-24 16:17:43+00:00): Hola, has creado varios puntos personales en el mapa. Este mapa no está destinado a eso. Los borré.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 05:28:01+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_5359 (2022-10-07 06:55:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/264552980. what is the meaning of the tag lorry = no?
angys (2022-10-07 07:14:59+00:00): It is not accessible by lorry
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-05 08:56:25+00:00): w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127036035 jeszcze dodałem obszar całego budynku (building:part potrzebują zawsze obszary building=*)
Dodko (2022-10-08 22:03:16+00:00): značka
branch=Drogéria je nesprávna, treba vymazať.
Peter Bremer (2024-12-25 18:11:03+00:00): Med denne update ble det fjernet både avvikende åpningstider, og lenker til nettsider slik at det blir vanskelig for bruke å sjekke åpningstider. Håpløst!
LockOnGuy (2022-10-05 23:47:25+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, again, please, do not delete the Arabic names entirely!         
in this changeseset you changed the 'name' from Arabic to Kurdish, In Erbil it is okay to change names to Kurdish since most of speakers speak Kurdish more than Arabic but you should've also moved these Arabic names to name:ar instead of removing them entirely...      
Here you did it to: node 7772647685 node 7049901385 node 6628535585 node 5695825424 node 5607190004
eggie (2022-10-05 06:49:58+00:00): Dg Floris.. Je pad eindigde op de landuse grass ipv op de weg. 
Dat routeert niet. 
Dus goed inzoomen.
Ik heb het pad doorverbonden naar de weg. 
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127006982

MVG
eggie
Dodko (2022-10-08 22:06:06+00:00): branch=stavebniny 
je nesprávne

shop=convenience je pre bežný malý obcchod s potravinamy

použite
shop=trade
trade=tiles

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dtrade
bxl-forever (2022-10-04 23:15:35+00:00): Hello,

After your edit, now there are two buildings with the number 42 here, causing validation issues. :-(
Duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358624659

I suggest you would review your change and remove the bad one.
vbombaerts (2022-10-05 07:01:56+00:00): @bxl-forever : Done
eggie (2022-10-04 18:48:51+00:00): access=no aangeven op het Doornhagervoetpad  is niet correct. Het zal access=private staan mits ook aangegeven middels een bord art 461 wvs  
Evt soms met foot=permissive als er toch gewandeld mag worden. 

Wat is je bron dat je weet dat dit pivate is? Er lopen hier wandelroutes.
Floris de Jong (2022-10-04 18:54:04+00:00): Hier heb ik ook gelopen. Is een privéweg naar de boerderij links aangegeven. Boer was niet blij dat ik er liep.
eggie (2022-10-04 19:00:36+00:00): Oke.. wanneer het staat aangegeven dan kun je access=private (ipv =no)aangeven.
Gelukkig had hij geen hond. :)

gr eggie
eggie (2022-10-05 06:53:46+00:00): Ik heb private getagd...  Er zijn routeplanners die access= no trouwens negeren, want dat wordt om de haverklap ten onrechte getagd. 
Kennelijk iets van editor iD

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-04 18:45:44+00:00): Floris.. Wat is je bron dat je weet dat hier geen pad is?
In de BGT omtrekgericht zie ik gewoon een pad.
Graag reactie want anders draai ik zulke zaken terug middels revert.
Het pad is toegevoegd door een Zeer ervaren mapper.
Graag reactie
eggie
Floris de Jong (2022-10-04 18:53:07+00:00): Ik heb hier afgelopen week gewandeld en er is hier geen pad te zien. Dit pad had ik namelijk in mijn wandelroute opgenomen. Dus in levenden lijve gecontroleerd.
eggie (2022-10-04 18:58:50+00:00): Oke... duidelijk.. Dan zal het zijn dichtgegroeid. De toevoeging was van 2017-08-09 00:2
Bedankt voor je reactie
eggie
eggie (2022-10-04 18:06:07+00:00): Hoi Klaas. denk niet dat 't klopt. Dit was al de recente import van de nieuwbouw van het clubhuis.
Het gebouw is in werkelijkheid kleiner.
Een luchtfoto is schuin genomen en kun je ook niet gebruiken om iets uit te lijnen. Ik zal het gebouw weer uitlijnen conform het Kadaster.
Overstekende dakdelen staan nooit in het Kadaster. Daar gaat het dus om het maaiveld. Daar staat het gebouw. Je zou wel bv die trappen kunnen intekenen.
gr eggie
eggie (2022-10-04 18:08:45+00:00): Het clubgebouw heb ik weer hersteld. 
paar keer ctrl-F5 voor het effect.
_klaas (2022-10-04 18:28:06+00:00): Bueno
eggie (2022-10-04 18:12:02+00:00): Inderdaad beter..
gr eggie
eggie (2022-10-04 18:17:29+00:00): Floris  Geen apden verwijderen waar wandelrouterelaties over lopen. Die in nu onderbroken. En er ligt wel meer dubbel hier. Ik ga dat eerst even herstellen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-04 18:24:34+00:00): route 15-16 hersteld..en wat dubbele tracks verwijderd. 

Je hebt ook de eigenschappen van de track verwijderd. Moeten die niet opnieuw worden toegevoegd
tracktype= grade?
surface=.. ?
eggie (2022-10-05 06:55:25+00:00): Die dubbele (gearceerde lijn)  lijn was getagd als brug?
eggie (2022-10-04 18:38:26+00:00): Beste Floris...  access=no is bijna altijd fout.
Dat hoort hier access=private te zijn. Kijk je nog een keer?
eggie
eggie (2022-10-05 06:56:51+00:00): aangepast naar private ipv no
eggie (2022-10-04 18:30:46+00:00): Floris...  Je tekent de paden dubbel in. Net of je je potlood niet van het papier haalt en gewoon nog een keer over het lijntje tekent. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127007739

Routeren doet dat niet. 
eggie
eggie (2022-10-04 18:34:30+00:00): De dubbele wegen en niet alleen daar op dat hoekje verwijderd. Check svp goed wat je hebt gedaan. Inzoomen en kijken, want anders wordt de kaart er echt niet beter van.
MVG
eggie
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-10-06 00:07:15+00:00): o parque de estacionamento 1100902292 foi marcado de forma errada de building=yes, por favor corrige, cumprimentos
aselvadeasfalto (2022-10-06 10:26:26+00:00): Ainda me estou a habituar ao JOSM... Corrigido! Obrigado.
hvalentim (2022-10-08 08:25:25+00:00): Continua a mapear partes de edifícios (e.g. varandas) como edifícios separados.

"Don't tag for the renderer

Here are some negative examples in context to buildings:
- building parts as distinct objects to structure the rendered picture"

Cf.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
aselvadeasfalto (2022-10-12 16:42:10+00:00): Olá hvalentim, obrigado pelo escrutínio.
Tenho-me focado em definir ao máximo a geometria de edifícios, deixando para o futuro o preenchimento de atributos, por mim ou qualquer outro editor. Os elementos em consola são uma particularidade da construção corrente desta época e zona, pois a sua expressão dimensional ultrapassa a sua insignificância tipológica; o problema é conciliar o seu traçamento à etiquetagem existente, e depois de algumas experiências ainda não alcancei uma solução definitiva. Ler artigos da wiki que apenas dizem o que não fazer não me adianta. Preciso de tempo e espaço para lhe dar uma resposta mais completa, assim como fazer rectificações, pelo que publicarei dentro de dias uma entrada no meu Diário detalhando tudo.
Abraço,
Selva
hvalentim (2022-10-15 09:07:47+00:00): Bom Dia,
Os edifícios, em particular, são uma área muito sub-trabalhada no OSM. O seu interesse por e o enorme trabalho que tem feito na área, mormente na margem sul, é obviamente de grande mérito.
Não obstante é importante ter presente que a etiqueta building deve ser reservada para o conjunto do respetivo "footprint/outline" (seja do conjunto simplificado do seu perímetro).
Os detalhes (partes) que compõem o edifício devem ser mapeados/descritos integrados numa relação usando o esquema 3D(1), de modo a ser adequadamente renderizados pelos serviços/plataformas que o suportam (2).
Tendo começado a usar o JOSM, há alguns plugins que podem interessar ao seu trabalho, se ainda não os explorou (3):
•	 Tracer 2. “Traces buildings and other shapes from a map” (tenta identificar/desenhar automaticamente o perfil do edifício a partir da distinta cor do respetivo telhado).
•	Kendzi3D. Ajuda na criação da relação entre as partes do edifício e exibe/simula o resultado do desenho 3D de um edifício.
•	CADTools. Ajuda a afinar as geometrias/formas.
•	ShapeTools. Idem.
•	Areaselector. “Allows selection of areas in a layer and automatic creation of a way as polygon. Built to ease mapping of building from background layers.”
•	BuildingGeneralization. “Allows the user to correct angle of buildings to 90 degrees, and aligns all loaded buildings to nearest road.“
•	ColorPlugin. “Provide functionality for Josm users who want to put 'color' attribute for roof and walls of the buildings”
•	ShapeTools
•	BuildingsTools. “Tools for drawing buildings”.
•	Indoorhelper. Gives assistance for the mapping process of indoor OSM building data. Includes a validator and a mappaint style for indoor-data.
•	
Em suma, quem queira investir no mapeamento detalhado dos edifícios , deve, sugiro, ter presente que o openstreemap não é o openstreetmap.org – é uma base de dados que admite distintos esquemas para distintos fins e gerando distintas interpretações/renderizações - e inteirar-se de dois esquemas complementares usados para os descrever: 1) o para a volumetria dos edifícios (em 3D) e 2) o para o “Indoor Mapping”, i.e., para a a descrição da repartição interna do espaço dentro de um edifício (5). Ao invés de tentar encaixar tudo no esquema base (de vocação bidimensional, restrito ao nível do building=*) e de se orientar pelo resultado consoante observado no openstreetmap.org.
(1)	Cf.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
(2)	E.g.: https://osmbuildings.org & https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=38.6965731&lon=-9.2029796&zoom=17
(3)	Cf.: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Plugins
(4)	https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Kendzi3D
(5)	https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping & https://openlevelup.net/?l=0#20/38.69590/-9.19339

Cump.s
H. Valentim
aselvadeasfalto (2022-10-25 16:48:48+00:00): Ena pá, tanta coisa! Obrigado pelos recursos. Alguns já conhecia, outros terei que experimentar. Vou passar uns tempos sem conseguir mexer muito no mapa e só daí é que poderei retomar onde parei.

Abraço,
Selva
lyctkel (2023-11-12 16:35:05+00:00): Hi cOSMografix,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3833829735 looks unusual.
You used waste_basket:position=green.
Did you mean colour=green or waste_basket:position=overground?
Regards,
lyctkel
cOSMografix (2023-11-13 20:29:49+00:00): Hello lyctkel
I don't know.
According to the history this data comes from version #1 by JLZIMMERMANN
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3833829735/history
I only confirmed the presence of 
-amenity waste_basket via StreetComplete
check_date 2022-10-04
Regards.
Bruno
lyctkel (2023-11-13 20:41:23+00:00): Hello cOSMografix,
sorry for my error. I'll contact JLZIMMERMANN .
Regards,
lyctkel
JLZIMMERMANN (2023-11-14 15:41:49+00:00): hello it's the same than for fire_hydrant 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fire_hydrant:position
lyctkel (2023-11-14 19:42:49+00:00): Hello JLZIMMERMANN,
sorry, I was not aware of this value for fire_hydrant:position . I had perceived green as a colour and thought it was a typo.  Thanks for the message.
JLZIMMERMANN (2023-11-15 13:40:11+00:00): you're welcome ;-)
pukkun (2022-11-03 07:28:28+00:00): 愛名緑地北部の三角形の調整池を消した理由はなんでしょうか？復活しても良いでしょうか？復活させます。
postown (2022-11-03 07:36:51+00:00): 私は調整池を消していません。いじったのは道路部分のみです。
万が一、誤って消えてしまっていたのであれば、復活して頂ければ幸いです。
pukkun (2022-11-03 07:52:22+00:00): ご丁寧にすみません。"943235981、第2版"だと思うのですが、iDで消えたウェイの表示方法が難しくてわかりません、なので、もし間違って指摘していたらすみません。
了解です。初心者なので復活方法が不明なため再描画します。道路作成ありがとうございます。とても助かります。
rarad74 (2022-10-04 19:21:02+00:00): Salut. Editarile tale sunt vizibile pentru toata lumea. te rog sa nu mai scrii notatii ce nu au legatura cu harta pe harta. Multumesc.
eggie (2022-10-04 18:55:13+00:00): Beste Choebs

Welkom bij OSM.. Zou je willen aangeven waarom in deze kledingwinkel een bushalte is?
In deze straat is ook verder geen busroute.
Bij welke busroute zou deze bushalte horen?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-05 07:41:34+00:00): bushalte voorlopig verwijderd
user_5359 (2022-10-06 06:48:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/895066039. What is the meaning of the tag Naming = Consistency?
(Inactive) Buddy-the-Elf (2022-10-06 15:04:38+00:00): Good morning! Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The data has been updated with the proper tagging!
Glassman (2022-10-09 01:30:16+00:00): From the imagery it looks like there is three levels of road, ground level, a middle level and the upper level for the Lewis and Clark Highway. Or am I not reading the imagery correctly? The way the roads cross seems wrong without there being multiple levels. Can you review your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127011295
eggie (2022-10-05 10:23:00+00:00): Dag Xander.. De consensus is om voor een korte periode niet highway=construction te gebruiken.
Dit gaat over goeie een week weer open.
Gebruik dan de consitionaltagging.
Even een voorbeeld  access:conditional=no @ (2021 Jan 20-2021 Apr 3) 

MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2022-10-05 10:36:06+00:00): Dat moet zijn: april 2023 !
:-)
eggie (2022-10-05 11:36:38+00:00): Het was even een voorbeeld .. niet de tagging
Maar ik zie nu dat het inderdaad april is volgend jaar.

We laten het maar op construction staan.  :)
jfd553 (2024-07-18 16:35:52+00:00): a multipolygon natural=wood (Relation: 6300380) was replaced by landuse=forest. Is there a difference between this multipolygon and the surrounding “forest” ones?
Viajero Perdido (2024-07-18 16:47:44+00:00): Hi.  I mapped much of the forest/wood in western Alberta originally.  At first I was marking it all as natural=wood, but came to realize that landuse=forest was likely more appropriate.  It's all managed forest in some sense, logged, replanted, ...

So when I revisit an area such as here, I've been switching the tagging, unless it's within a park where logging etc. is unlikely.  (The old CanVec imports were all natural=wood, but that doesn't mean anything.)

The distinction is subtle enough, that I know of no renderers that show the two styles differently.

In the case of Cache Percotte Forest, it's demonstration/training forest with a sign to that effect at the entrance.  I was camped in it when an enforcement training exercise formed around me.  I was a surprise to them (it wasn't focused on me), so I agreed with their polite suggestion I'd sleep better if I'd moved camp elsewhere.)
jfd553 (2024-07-18 21:33:54+00:00): Sin problema :-)
Viajero Perdido (2024-07-18 22:31:50+00:00): PS, nobody thought to ask me if I had a random-camping permit (I do).  Enforcement, hah.  :D
eggie (2022-10-05 10:20:33+00:00): warnings:impossible_oneway:highway

Dag Xander.. Het lijkt me niet correct wat je hebt gedaan. Het geeft ook foutmeldingen 

Wanneer een weg zo kort is afgesloten wordt het ook afgeraden om zo'n wegdeel op construction te zetten. Ove iets meer dan een week is de weg weer open.
Je kunt een tijdelijke afsluiting ook taggen met
consitionaltagging
Bv
access:conditional=no @ (2021 Jan 20-2021 Apr 3) 

Pas je het svp aan?

MVG
eggie
XanderN (2022-10-05 15:39:00+00:00): Beste eggie, alle straten grenzend aan de Wielingenstraat (ten zuiden hiervan) blijven tot zeker april 2023 afgesloten voor al het verkeer, niet voor alleen 1 week.
eggie (2022-10-05 15:54:36+00:00): Klopt.. ik was te snel met mn reactie..
Dit kan wel op construction voor die periode.
Die conditionaltag was gewoon als willekeurig voorbeeld bedoeld.
Groet..
Eggie
Bi Bim Bap (2022-10-23 21:42:45+00:00): to mikro to sprawdzasz osobiscie? bo na zaliwskiego jakies hece widze, 16 i 18 polaczone podworka, stoczkowska 7 ma podwojne wejscie z tylu a tam jest jedno i to z boku, stoczkowska 9 zrobiles oddzielnie driveway a oddzielnie footway jak tam jest jedno podworko, przychodnia nucleus dawno temu wyniosla sie na kobielska...
Bi Bim Bap (2022-10-23 21:49:52+00:00): stoczkowska 5 to nie ma ogrodka na calosci podworka tylko obskurny smietnik i trzepak za trafo, co ty z ortofoto lecisz z mikro?
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-24 14:20:56+00:00): Przechadzam się po mapowanych terenach no ale przecież nie będę komuś do domu wchodził. Nucleus dalej informacje wiszą więc nie wiedziałem że się przenieśli. Połączone podwórka to tak z orto mi wychodzi i z ukośnych.  7 na ukośnych widziałem że jakieś dwa od tyłu ale jak wiesz lepiej to poprawię/popraw. 9 okej, do zamiany
Bi Bim Bap (2022-10-24 16:09:33+00:00): ja bym radzil nie dodawac czegos czego na 100procent nie ma pewnosci bo wprowadza w blad.
o a jeszcze oznaczasz kazde podworko jako ogrodek a tu zwykle sa rozdeptane dzikie trawniki a nie zadne ogrodki...
nic na sile, nie?
Bi Bim Bap (2022-10-24 16:14:25+00:00): a w ogole to jedziesz chyba z ortofoto a co z granicami posesji i zarysami budynkow z geo? ortofoto nie jest na 100pro dokladna szczegolnie na plotach czy murach w granicy posesji
Bi Bim Bap (2022-10-24 16:19:57+00:00): ejj a co na stoczkowskiej 15 robi farmland? kilka grzondek warzyw to jeszcze nie farma chyba, co tam jest?
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-24 17:33:08+00:00): Cóż. Ogródki i inne rzeczy na terenach prywatnych to chyba jest tak mało istotna rzecz, że nikogo w błąd nie wprowadzi. Budynki są zaimportowane pluginem plbuildings z danych BDOT więc obrysy ich są prawidłowe. Dodatkowo sprawdzam ilość pięter i przeznaczenie oraz dodaję building:part gdzie robi to różnicę. Co do farmland no to jak ktoś tam coś uprawia to uznałem, że dodam. Można podyskutować na discordzie lub na forum o takim zastosowaniu tego tagu.
ElliottPlack (2022-10-06 20:30:13+00:00): Nice catch! so the one part of Walther is still closed?
user_5359 (2022-10-22 10:57:41+00:00): Hallo! Bitte Sieh Dir den Weg http://www.osm.org/way/61302291 nochmal an. Was ist die Bedeutung von dem Tag sidewalk: = separate?
Langlaeufer (2022-10-22 18:33:15+00:00): Das bedeutet das die Fußwege separat eingezeichnet sind.
user_5359 (2022-10-22 19:05:05+00:00): Aber dann ohne Doppelpunkt oder mit left/right Postfix
Langlaeufer (2022-10-22 19:50:06+00:00): Okay Doppelpunkt  ist ein Tippfehler aber rechts links ist vollkommen überflüssig
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-05 13:49:33+00:00): Ciao. La highway=track parallela al Naviglio d'Ivrea aveva il tag access=private ma e' stato cancellato in questo changeset. Pero' ci sono i cartelli che specificano che il transito anche pedonale e' interdetto salvo autorizzazione. Tale tag deve essere quindi ripristinato. Bisogna sempre seguire le restrizioni legali di transito e non basarsi sull'uso tipico (o altro). Ciao, Andrea
Polarbear-repair (2022-10-05 19:17:23+00:00): Danke für die neuerliche Korrektur.
Gibt es denn inzwischen ein Schild an dem Platz?
impiaaa (2022-10-05 19:22:38+00:00): The website seems to indicate that this location is part of the normal Chick-fil-A brand, but you've tagged it as "not:brand:wikidata=Q491516", to indicate that it is not. Which is correct?
Akiba220 (2022-10-05 20:16:13+00:00): I got an error popping up when I tried to enter Chick-fil-A as the business name. It suggested the tag which is currently in use. I will try to see if I can change it.
Akiba220 (2022-10-05 20:21:09+00:00): I went ahead and removed this tag from the listing.