piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
os-emmer (2024-03-02 10:58:25+00:00): What you describe is tagging for the renderer:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

You added a tag not because it adds real world information but just to get a subjectivly nice map in your favourite renderer. That is not good practice. Please abstain from that practice.

Personally I do not think that life rings should be rendered on OSM-carto. I am not sure but I think even before my removal of amenity=emergency they where not rendered on OSM-carto. If we rendered every small and insicnificant object the map would be very crowded. Specalised maps like openseamap could render such objects. If you want them to render them you need to get in contact with the author of the renderer and ask them. If they decide to render them than thats fine.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2024-03-04 10:37:43+00:00): I've never heard or that however the page you’re referring to is useful. 
"...every small and insignificant object..." I wouldn’t describe something that can save a life in this way, not ever! Similar to defibrillators. 
Please Help me here, why on earth map something that does not show up? 
Why have tags etc.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Emergency_facilities_and_amenities
os-emmer (2024-03-04 16:14:56+00:00): I didn't mean that life rings are not important in general. They are just very small and not always interesting. But that depends on the use case of the data consumer.

emergency=defibrilator is also not rendered on OSM-carto. Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11304832734
It is the same with emergency=fire_hydrant. Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3798292277

OSM-carto, the default map you see on openstreetmap.org, is just one of many use cases of the OSM data. It is still important/usefull to map objects that are not rendered here. There is for example openfiremap:
http://www.openfiremap.de/?zoom=14&lat=49.46043&lon=11.11525&layers=B00000T
When zoomed in enough you see every emergency=fire_hydrant as a red dot.

So if someone wants to offer a map showing every emergency=life_ring they can do it pretty easily, if they are existent in the OSM-database.

I hope I was able to help you. If you still have any questions feel free to ask them.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2024-03-07 09:57:37+00:00): Thank you for the response. I had no idea the fire-map even exsisted. 
Understood.
olo81 (2022-08-16 12:43:38+00:00): nazwy opisowe do poprawy, najlepiej przenieść te nazwy do opisu. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
pio2_122 (2022-04-18 19:49:19+00:00): Wkradł się błąd. Zamiast dodania tagu "name:pl"="Szczecin Port Centralny", została zmieniona wartość tagu "name" na "pl:Szczecin Port Centralny".

Poprawiłem to.
BartekChom (2022-04-18 20:01:37+00:00): Aj, dziękuję, przepraszam.
Dodko (2022-04-18 14:13:38+00:00): Adresa sa nepridáva do bodu/node pokiaľ už existuje na budove/way.
Davileci (2022-05-29 22:08:06+00:00): Según Correos, en el tramo de la calle del Príncipe de Vergara desde el cruce con la avenida de Concha Espina hasta la calle de Pedro de Valdivia rige el código postal 28002 y no 28006.
Davileci (2022-05-29 22:18:43+00:00): Parece que se ha cometido el mismo error con más calles de la zona: añadir el código postal terminado en 6 en vez de en 2 como figura en Correos.
Iván_ (2022-05-30 22:20:49+00:00): Hola, 
he corregido los CP de la zona, 28006 estaba aplicado allí por error. Se trata como bien indicas del 28002.

Gracias
Un saludo
SLMapper (2022-05-29 14:55:02+00:00): Hallo, danke fürs eintragen. Das ist allerdings ein zusammenhängendes Haus. An der construction hing auch die Hausnummer, die du leider gelöscht hast. Ich habe die jetzt an einen Teil gepackt und die Teile nach Luftbild grob resized und verschoben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121663017
kapazao (2022-04-19 15:12:28+00:00): Si es circular, ¿no debería ser roundtrip=yes? :D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119832360
inode64 (2022-04-20 18:54:31+00:00): Yo hice la ruta circular en La Sagra, pero es una unión de 2 sendas diferentes.
Una la PR-A 321 y la otra la SL-A 299 que se unen en la cima de la montaña
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119832360
BCNorwich (2022-04-19 07:29:07+00:00): Hello There,
Unfortunately, you added the tag highway=service to a large forest area. I've now removed the tag. I think you did this inadvertently because the forest area was joined onto the highway. Joining areas to highway center lines is bad practice because it leads to mistakes like yours. I think I've unjoined the highways from forest areas.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-20 21:07:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121260282 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some implausible mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6004 .
eggie (2022-04-18 05:47:58+00:00): Dag Fris44  Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-17 22:39:30+00:00): NAAWI-OODENA MASTER PLAN
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
topolusitania (2022-04-17 22:50:24+00:00): Olá ecos da montanha
 O que pretendes dizer à comunidade quando digitas "XXX"? Será assim tão dificil escrever algo como "novos caminhos" ? Ou será que com tantas contribuições te esqueceste do que fizeste  ?
Cumprimentos
TL
mariotomo (2022-04-19 16:44:29+00:00): Hola Vidalys Rivera; recibas mi cordial bienvenida a OSM. hay todo un universo de comunidades OSM, y mucha información sobre cómo uno maximice su propio impacto en la comunidad. uno, quizás el principal para los que viven en un lugar, es cuidar los nombres. por favor revisa la escuela 1052532459, cómo se llama en realidad? ahora dices "United Schoold of" que no creo que esté bien, o sí?
el copia-pega de los edificios que añadiste no se ve muy bien. entra en alguna comunidad online para recibir apoyo como mejorar tu estilo.
renuevo mi bienvenida y espero volverte a ver mapeando.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
abakus_uploader (2022-04-18 22:31:00+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_2008655 (2022-04-18 06:34:57+00:00): サービスエリアは供用開始？
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user4816003805 (2022-04-27 21:00:54+00:00): FYI, you can also add tags like "opening_hours:signed=no" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:opening_hours:signed%3Dno) to show that the hours aren't posted. StreetComplete uses this to prevent prompting for hours where none are displayed.
For irregular hours, opening_hours can take comment strings like `opening_hours=Mo-Su "Irregular hours"` (https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo-Su%20%22Irregular%20hours%22).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 01:33:26+00:00): the street names i have added are not made up and are not copied from google, they are the actual street names in the correct places
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
zadarmokurla (2022-06-04 21:50:39+00:00): Przedszkole nie istnieje w tym miejscu, lol. Dziękuję za poprawę tego miejsca.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Frans S (2022-04-18 10:17:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
D: nodes of buildings linked/crosses to other buildings, fences  or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119834042
Dodko (2022-04-18 13:29:51+00:00): Ak je to lesná cestička
highway=path
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dpath
tak automaticky sa tam môže ísť pešo, bicyklom, koňom a auto má zákaz
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Slovakia

Preto tieto značky netreba nadbytočne pridávať.
access 	no
bicycle 	yes
foot 	yes
horse 	yes
motor_vehicle 	no
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
frosm (2022-07-20 16:15:46+00:00): Bonjour,
ERDF est devenu, sauf erreur, Enedis
Minotaure (2022-07-20 19:51:37+00:00): Bonjour. En effet l'acronyme a changé. J'ai pensé être au plus vrai en inscrivant ce qui est affiché sur les installations....
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_5359 (2022-04-18 05:53:11+00:00): Hello! A ref number isn't the name of a room.
NK Whitla (2022-04-18 06:21:36+00:00): Thanks for the info, I've just been doing it the way I was told to originally, and how I've seen others do it. What I put in ref is the room ID numbers, some of which begin with and/or have letters in them. Is there somewhere else to put the room ID's?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Der Bierpuncheur (2023-01-04 20:47:04+00:00): Good evening and bonne année à toi. Looking at this area, I saw w845752209 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845752209/history) which was originally a "highway=path" but was changed to a cycleway. Is this correct? Functionally, it would be inefficient and unsafe to cycle on this path, but before I change it, I could not determine if it is designated a cycleway officially. Can you help? Or should I tag it FixMe?
bxl-forever (2023-01-04 22:06:22+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for sharing thoughts here.  The change into a cycleway was in v2 of the object, not in my changeset.

That being said, I see a D10 sign here, which makes it legal to use this path, and intended as such by the local authorities.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=115889621114934
highway=cycleway + foot=yes + segregated=no seems to be a good set of tags in such a case.
(highway=footway + bicycle=yes + segregated=no is a synonym, it’s just a choice if we want to see it primarily as a cycle track or as a sidewalk; in this case I agree with highway=cycleway)

I don’t know this cycle track in great detail, it seems to be narrower on other places and probably impossible to use near the railway bridge:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=447370653824984

So, if you had planned to examine this, maybe you could inspect if there are different parts of it that should be treated differently.  In that case, split the cycleway and connect it to the main road if necessary.  Cycle routing seems broken on this point: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7890527540

If you were planning to survey here or spend some time fixing the map, your help would be appreciated.

One last thing: highway=path is a generic category that broadly says "something for pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders, and not for cars", typically version 1 of most objects, traced very roughly in the early days.  Then, when we bring more knowledge into the map, we usually change paths into something more detailed.

Happy mapping.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
BCNorwich (2022-04-19 06:49:42+00:00): Hi, Please don't add natural=sand to the bunkers. It is not as per OSM guidance. A bunker isn't a natural feature anyway, it's man-made with a surface of sand. A lot of bunker tagging has now twice been corrected.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-23 04:25:57+00:00): These roads don't match available imagery.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 22:03:31+00:00): i fixed it, thanks to Maxar Imagery