piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mga_geo (2021-03-10 06:32:33+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai utilisé les données GTFS en opendata pour compléter les différents éléments du réseau.
Il y a souvent des divergences entre ces données, les données des sites web, les données des dépliants papier, l'affichage sur les arrêts, l'affichage sur les bus ...
Étant à distance je ne peux pas privilégier les affichages !
Dans ce genre de cas lorsque je suis un "local", je contacte l'opérateur pour signaler l'anomalie, photo à l'appui.
Bonne journée
Marc
PS : réponse tardive car je ne suis que rarement derrière un clavier depuis le début du mois
trial (2021-03-10 19:44:18+00:00): Bonjour, je supposais effectivement pour l'origine des données. C'est un peu comme d'autres jeux de données, quand on leur aura expliqué que la majuscule n'est pas obligatoire et les signes diactriques pas facultatifs...
Et quand les fiches de l'opérateur sont plus corrects que leur GTFS, on leur dit RTFM ? ;-(
maxerickson (2021-02-12 16:19:14+00:00): The pieces should be tagged building:part and not building.

building:part=school is a valid tag.

(I was looking as I replied to your comment).
treestryder (2021-02-20 17:21:32+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMapping!
Is this the name on the sign or building that someone would see from the road? Otherwise, the use of tags like old_name or alt_name might be appropriate.
ELSafeRoutes (2021-02-23 14:13:55+00:00): Hi! This is the name currenly on the sign. The Marble school will be located there (and named on the sign) until construction of the new Marble building is completed (some time this summer). Will remove the name when Marble moves out.
treestryder (2021-02-23 17:52:18+00:00): Perfect. Just wanted to make sure.

I see a lot of new and one-time mappers adding/changing creative names, unaware of best practices.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. =) 

Take a look at the Michigan Wiki page, we have started to informally meet each month.
gscholz (2021-02-16 06:11:05+00:00): Hi fgp789,
this changeset had destroyed two boundary relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-87.44251&lat=12.74084&zoom=10

Please watch out what you are doing. If you deal with relations I recommend to use JOSM as this editor shows error messages if you try to upload broken relations.
Kind Regards
Guido
fgp789 (2021-02-17 14:03:35+00:00): Thanks, I did not realize those mistakes! I´ll install JOSM to check error messages.
ivanbranco (2021-02-12 16:49:38+00:00): Ciao Mtech79,

il tag parking_space=* si utilizza con gli amenity=parking_space, quindi va tolto. Il tag area=yes è superfluo. Il nome mi sembra descrittivo. La rappresentazione come multipoligono non è necessaria. 

L'edificio a fianco dalle foto aeree sembra squadrato, per squadrare un'area puoi cliccarci sopra e poi premere Q sulla tastiera da iD.

Se hai domande falle pure, se so risponderti lo faccio volentieri.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-13 15:25:11+00:00): Ciao. I landuse non devono avere il nome della borgata/frazione/paese. Inoltre, non devono essere attaccati ad altre feature come le strade. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99186315
literan (2021-02-12 17:09:25+00:00): а там именно кафе, со столиками и официантами? просто под этой маркой обычно фастфуды с кофе на вынос
neo-plan (2021-02-12 20:04:58+00:00): Помещение со столиками и на вынос тоже есть.
literan (2021-02-13 12:34:48+00:00): ясно, тогда, конечно, кафе. добавил cuisine=coffee_shop
takeaway=yes
Futur3r (2021-02-12 17:10:21+00:00): Pour l'aller qui va au portail des jardins, tu peux utiliser highway=service pour toute les voie d'accès.

T'as mis un traffic_calming sur un trottoir.

Et la "boulangerie" comme à la maison, existait déjà, il fallait simplement déplacer le POI
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99186604
mariotomo (2021-10-08 18:02:04+00:00): hola. whenever you have time to (virtually) come back to Panamá, would you mind reviewing your highway=track, at least those in residential areas? maybe also those connecting villages?
as said elsewhere: map according to function.
if in doubt, ask the local community.
Trevor_1 (2021-10-09 14:21:43+00:00): Ok got it
Trevor_1 (2021-10-09 14:22:47+00:00): Don't you think these roads here should be track roads? Espescially the ones without houses?
mariotomo (2021-10-09 14:34:02+00:00): my interpretation of mapping according to function is that Roads connecting settlements to each other and to the main road network are not "track". Moreover, here in Panama, roads that have been designed to serve agriculture and logging are closed for other traffic, and only very occasionally manage to develop as part of the road network.
mariotomo (2021-10-09 14:35:58+00:00): In short, if it looks like "track", and it connects settlements, it better be tagged as unclassified unpaved.
mariotomo (2021-10-09 14:38:31+00:00): If it bears no sign of 4wheel traffic, maybe path. Do try to get comments from local people in the group.
Trevor_1 (2021-10-09 14:58:21+00:00): Ok
nitro_expander (2021-02-12 18:14:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8418710819
lol duplicate , I just added the building XD
mueschel (2021-02-18 12:36:48+00:00): Hi,
are the nodes you added here destination signs?
Could you use one of the established tagging schemes for this? E.g.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
danieldegroot2 (2021-02-12 17:41:23+00:00): Hey there,

If you are unsure how to tag an object, please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
You can also start learning OpenStreetMap at https://learnosm.org/ (some information may be outdated).

You have made numerous changesets where you have used incorrect tagging for residential areas and mapped places as areas instead of nodes. Also, you should not use capital letters when tagging unless adding a name.
mariotomo (2023-08-18 05:57:21+00:00): ciao, se hai ancora modo, puoi confermare che la "meridiana del campus" sia una meridiana vera e propria, funzionale, e non solo un oggetto artistico? se così fosse, potresti aggiungere i campi amenity=clock, display=sundial, e support forse ground?
Alexey Vazhnov (2021-02-13 16:33:12+00:00): The name is too long.
Tag healthcare=optometrist is probably wrong.
eggie (2021-02-12 17:53:56+00:00): Oke.. Het eerste pad.. Je splitst het wandelpad op twee plaatsen. Daarna verander je highway=footway in highway=steps  Dan krijg je een trap.
Succes,
eggie
gradypark86 (2021-02-15 03:47:53+00:00): 你好，变更集：99188792中哈尔滨西站西广场附近丽江路修改有误，将新地图改回了老地图。目前半圆形道路已通车数月，详细情况可查看Google earth此处卫星图。
timmito (2021-02-13 12:03:40+00:00): Hallo, description ist nicht für Werbung gedacht, bitte entfernen oder entsprechend anpassen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description?uselang=de

Ist die ganze Birkenstraße 20 ein Laden? Wenn nicht, dann ist es besser den Laden als einzelnen Punkt einzutragen.
Marcussacapuces91 (2022-01-06 12:58:34+00:00): Tous les names ont des espaces en préambule
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 09:41:08+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
Mostly looks good, just a couple of things.
The turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12103516 only has one member, but seems to be not needed as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12308049 seems to cover that.
I think that first one can just be removed then, I'll let you do that, unless you want me to?

Also, there are quite a few no u-turn restrictions here, the wiki suggests:
"Don't map turn restrictions that are the default for a given jurisdiction and are not signed"
and
"A no_u_turn restriction relation is primarily useful if the from and to members are distinct ways".
So unless there are specific signs, then I would say these aren't needed.
bxl-forever (2021-02-13 09:36:10+00:00): Hello,

Are you sure of the new maxspeeds?

Contrary to popular belief, not 100% of streets in Brussels switched to a 30-kph speed regime in January.  There are exceptions.

I spotted the C43 signs with 50-kph myself along Route de Lennik/Lennikse Baan.
For Joseph Wybran, official Brussels data confirmed this street would keep a 50-kph regime.

What is the source of your information?
Glassman (2021-02-13 00:37:51+00:00): #TIP: The building outline should just cover the roof of the building. Can you fix this store? Also I'd tag the building as building=retail
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99189709
tony_hny (2021-03-10 11:43:26+00:00): Hi Hibrida Jaya, welcome to OSM. The roads you added here do not exist in any imagery, so I’m going to remove them. Let me know if they are planned to be constructed. If you want to map imaginary things, there is another project called OpenGeoFiction: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenGeofiction 

Hai Hibrida Jaya, selamat datang di OSM. Kota yang Anda tambahkan di sini tidak ada dalam citra apa pun, jadi saya akan menghapusnya. Beri tahu saya jika direncanakan untuk dibangun. Jika Anda ingin memetakan hal-hal imajiner, ada proyek lain bernama OpenGeoFiction: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenGeofiction
gileri (2021-02-12 19:03:50+00:00): Merci pour cette correction !
MKnight (2021-02-12 19:17:44+00:00): Moin, mich würde interessieren, wie Du das gefunden hast, zufällig, oder über ein Tool?

Ich frage, weil ich es etwas komisch finde, dass es bisher nicht in der osmose-liste war.

Die: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/errors/?country=germany_thueringen&item=0&level=1,2,3
FvGordon (2021-02-12 19:49:16+00:00): Mit dem OSM-Inspector ( http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry , nur die beiden "self intersecting ways" angekreuzt) finde ich diese Fehler. In der Anfangszeit des Editors iD wurden Landflächen öfters rechteckig gemacht, die ich damit gefunden und dann mit JOSM reverted hatte.
tux67 (2021-02-13 13:02:35+00:00): Hi - Welche Fehler? Und ja .. die Gebäude gibt's - sowohl auf POKS als auch vor Ort. Wenn du deine CS hochlädtst, wäre eine Angabe über deine Quellen sehr wünscheswert.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99190233
MartinKausO (2021-02-14 09:19:04+00:00): Hallo tux67.
Die Angabe des Fehlers steht bei mir in meiner Ansicht des changeset mit drin:"resolved:crossing_ways:building-building". Wie ich darauf komme, dass es das Bebäude rechts neben Hausnummer 26 nicht geben könnte? Ich sehe da nur auf einem niederländischen Luftbild was. Die anderen Luftbilder zeigen dort m.E. einen Autostellplatz. Ich habe ja nicht bestritten, dass es das Gebäude gibt, denn schließlich hast Du es ja erst vor einem Jahr gemappt...
Gruß
tux67 (2021-02-14 16:40:35+00:00): Danke für's prompte feedback .. die Bilder aus NL sind hier die aktuellsten. Auf den NRW DOPs sieht man an dieser Stelle auch nicht viel wegen des Schattens. Die von iD eingefügten Tags sieht man hier in omcha nicht - es werden Quelle und Änderungssatzkommentar angezeigt. 
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99190233
arte2002 (2021-02-13 20:29:22+00:00): Hola, el sendero del Pic del Frare es erróneo cruza una pared vertical de 50 m.
Your Village Maps (2021-04-18 21:35:06+00:00): I *do* hope that all of these recent tags ref=I 80 Alt are signed (which I think would be strange). If they are *not* signed and it's only *on paper* then the key should be changed to unsigned_ref.
Stretch Longfellow (2021-04-19 14:39:25+00:00): They are signed! Nebraska started signing these about 10 years ago; far as I know it's the only state to have an alt Interstate system to this degree. Sometimes it is just the regular Interstate shield with an ALT banner over it, but in many cases they actually have special signs and sometimes it's even better signed than the actual route. There are even a few cases (N 27th St in Lincoln, the old Matzke Hwy near Seward) where it doesn't even follow a state or US Route.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-13 13:09:20+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non usare le immagini satellitari di Bing perché non sono ben allineate. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99190864
agvvkg (2021-02-14 09:00:44+00:00): Grazie. Due osservazioni:
1. Opentreetmap consente solo feedback di correzione tra utenti. a dritto allo scopo, ma deprime l'esperienza utente di chi offre contributi occasionali negli scarsi ritagli di tempo, e deve imparare. Le persone preferiscono essere incoraggiate; estendere la comunità di entusiasti è il modo più divertente per mappare! Riassumendo: un grandissimo grazie a chi come te fornisce suggerimenti!!!
2. Grazie ancora x il suggerimento; in questo specifico caso le immagini ESRI non sono aggiornate come Bing.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-14 09:09:24+00:00): Ciao. Invece delle Bing puoi allora usare la Maxar che sono le più aggiornate. Però anche queste non sono allineate perfettamente (ma mai come le Bing). Puoi comunque riallinearle manualmente usando la fuzione "Offset delle immagini" in iD: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#iD Ciao, Andrea
user_5359 (2021-02-12 19:51:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is your meaning of the tag Street=residential ?
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 10:07:01+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit, it looks good to me.
It would really help others to understand what you'd mapped if you put a more detailed description, i.e. what did you update and why?
Allison P (2021-04-18 00:59:24+00:00): The street names haven't been posted yet though, and it hasn't been subdivided yet.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 10:18:29+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
As well as cycleway:left:oneway=yes I think you also need cycleway:left=(something), depending on what it is.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 10:21:36+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change. It looks good, but you've used a non-standard value for the cycleway. There's only one other use of buffered_lane in the UK. Perhaps track would be better?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Cycle_tracks
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 10:22:44+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change. It all looks good to me.
Swic (2023-05-29 19:47:42+00:00): Hey, how comes the Chemin des Vaches (899948044) is a private way ? The GR is using the path, can we switch it to public ?
Axelos (2023-06-08 14:13:11+00:00): Hello,

This is an error, the restriction only concerns vehicles.
Photo January 2021: https://broman.fr/divers/temp/osm/photos/DSCN0318.JPG

I have corrected https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899948044

Thank you !
user_5359 (2021-02-12 20:05:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/148370737: What ist the meaning of the tag roof:shape=g
Yod4z (2021-02-12 21:30:47+00:00): Sorry iD not completed my inscription.

Corrected
pio2_122 (2021-02-13 09:58:00+00:00): Dla pewności - czy ten plac zabaw jest zamykany na klucz, który mają tylko mieszkańcy tych bloków? (to by odpowiadało dodaniu znacznika access=private)
Panicz89 (2021-02-13 10:30:14+00:00): Na pewno jest furtka z zamkiem. Nie widziałem też , aby dzieci z sąsiednich bloków bawiły się tam, więc z dużym prawdopodobieństwem moge stwierdzić, że jest to zamykany placyk zabaw.
pio2_122 (2021-02-13 10:30:58+00:00): Wszystko jasne, dzięki :)
VitalieS (2021-02-13 00:09:01+00:00): Bună,
Punctele șterse par ar fi alimentare sau magazine / baruri de prin sat, nu locații inexistente sau domicilii cu date personale.
De exemplu:
Î.I. Gavriluță Raisa
Î.I. Busuioc Rodica
etc, etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99193148
hector-395 (2021-02-12 20:41:31+00:00): Connected golf ways accordingly within the relation in order for the landuse to display properly.
chris66 (2023-03-22 08:09:33+00:00): Hi,
auf welchem Luftbild ist dieser Baum zu sehen? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8419055492

Ich sehe da ne Ruine :-)

Grüße
Chris
dx125 (2023-03-22 08:52:41+00:00): Moin,
wenn du solche von mir verursachten nicht beabsichtigt unkorrekten Objekte findest, dann bitte einfach korrigieren.
Manchmal finde ich selbst solche Sachen, zum Beispiel Hausruinen, wo ich dann aber feststelle, dass es tatsächlich keine Ruine sondern ein Baum ist. Und wer hat's falsch gemappt? Ich.
Ich bin halt etwas Detail-verliebt und manchmal auch etwas verpeilt. Insel-begabt mit gelegentlichen Ausfällen.
Ein ständiger Kampf um Perfektion, der mir nicht vollständig gelingt, aber ich arbeite daran ;-)
landfahrer (2021-02-24 21:41:52+00:00): please change the landuse tag from relation 12308597
brianboru (2021-02-25 15:17:02+00:00): Thanks -fixed
andrewwiseman (2021-05-14 00:47:51+00:00): Hello. Regarding the motorway construction here, I don't see any changes in any of the public imagery in areas such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728131840 and around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6814916022 , so I do not believe this motorway should not be routable for users yet. Do you have another resource that shows it is currently open? Similarly for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753713412 and the nearby links, these do not seem to exist yet either. According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction these tags should be switched so they are highway=construction, construction=motorway_link. 

Hola. Con respecto a la construcción de la autopista aquí, no veo ningún cambio en ninguna de las imágenes públicas en áreas como https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728131840 y alrededor de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/ 6814916022, por lo que no creo que esta autopista no deba ser enrutable todavía para los usuarios. ¿Tiene otro recurso que muestre que está abierto actualmente? De manera similar, para https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753713412 y los enlaces cercanos, estos tampoco parecen existir todavía. Según https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction, estas etiquetas deben cambiarse para que sean highway = construction, construction = motorway_link.

Gracias.
abakus_uploader (2021-02-12 23:32:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
InsertUser (2021-02-12 21:44:12+00:00): Actually adding a building passage, forgot to update the changeset comment.
user_5359 (2021-02-13 05:43:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6977541761/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
SK53 (2021-03-20 14:55:32+00:00): Please can you not tag tertiary roads with the ref tag: doing so causes endless confusion for people using OSM-based satnavs who will never see signage for them. The consensus of the UK community is to use admin_ref for internal highway authority references such as these C-road numbers.

I haven't looked in detail at which roads you have moved to tertiary, but internal HA references are not necessarily a good guide to what fellow mappers may see on the ground. For instance it's inconsistent to have Boyn Hill Road as tertiary and not All Saints Avenue (a consensus held over 16 years that these were just broad residential roads).

Also FOI requests are not necessarily admissable info in OpenStreetMap (they do not imply a copyright waiver).

Regards,

Jerry
olo81 (2021-02-12 22:39:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771961598

Jeszcze punktowo przyklejone, ale na dole tą drogę serwisową trzeba połączyć z chodnikiem teraz jest jeszcze przypięta do terenu. Ciągi piesze łączymy na końcach z drogami i tak jak tu jeśli droga kończy się przy chodniku. 
Łączenie obszarów z budynkami też chyba nie jest najlepszym pomysłem ale musiał bym się zorientować czy tolerowane to jest. 

Widzę że chyba podczas rozłączania zrozumiałeś jaki pieprznik powoduje łączenie obszarów z drogami :D Najgorsze że przy tworzeniu relacji i cięciu dróg można łatwo przypadkiem pociąć obszary. A rozłączanie to masakra, jeszcze ty w ID edytujesz to tam może być jeszcze gorzej.
blackboxlogic (2021-02-13 19:52:00+00:00): I'm wondering why you've changed this street name (do you have a reference for the new name)? I'm changing it back to what the Maine Department of Transportation says it is. (see https://www.maine.gov/mdot/postedroads/map/)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99195855
blackboxlogic (2021-02-13 19:57:01+00:00): Also.... I'm curios what lead you to change this name?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99195855
VLD151 (2021-02-16 17:47:57+00:00): Hi Blackboxlogic, 
Thank you for reaching out. I was checking for profanity and the Tiger 2019 data gave me an incorrect name of Dockman. Please let me know if you have further questions about this change.
Jami
blackboxlogic (2021-02-16 18:13:53+00:00): Thanks for mentioning your reference. I don't see a street sign which is disappointing. It seems this is a good use for the alt_name tag (which I'll add adding with a note). To leave a paper trail, here's an article about the parking garage on the west of the street, naming it the "Dickman Street Garage": https://web.archive.org/web/20200224175014/https://www.centralmaine.com/2020/02/23/study-recommends-augusta-charge-hourly-for-downtown-water-street-parking/
Frans S (2021-07-20 14:25:39+00:00): Hello Manuel. Thanks for mapping here
A remark, Please tag highways in non residential areas as "residential" 
Preferred tag is "unclassified'or higher, added with surface= unpaved when there is no asphalt or similar.
Best regards
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-03-21 14:28:21+00:00): você deixou toda essa via: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906093915 como ponte :D
user_5359 (2021-02-13 04:47:05+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
ACCESS_TYP	Public Access
COUNTY	Salem
CREATED_DA	2017-10-21T00:00:19.000Z
DSGNTN_DAT	2015-01-23T05:00:00.000Z
ENCMBRNC_T	Statute or Constitutional Provision
FEATURE_SO	Survey with coordinates
FEE_SMPL_N	Union Lake Wildlife Management Area
GISACRES	51.06086075
LAST_EDITE	2018-10-25T00:08:49.000Z
MANAGED_BY	Division of Fish and Wildlife
MANAGETYPE	S
MUNICIPALI	Pittsgrove Township
OBJECTID	13767
OWNER	New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
OWNERTYPE	S
PAMS_PIN	1711_3002_26
PCLBLOCK	3002
PCLLOT	26
PCL_MUN	1711
PRGRM_ENCM	Encumbered
PRIMARY_US	Wildlife Management Area
SHAPE_Area	2224202.1973532764
SHAPE_Leng	7808.8196231945367
STATCODE	21.0
fid	13767
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
see https://www.osm.org/way/906680269
Sal Mangiafico (2021-02-13 13:07:51+00:00): I think I have this all cleaned up...  I deleted the small parcel with the bad tags, as it isn't really useful.  I added the appropriate tags to the other areas.

New changesets 99204150 , 99204112
eggie (2021-02-12 22:14:35+00:00): Dag Sterfan... Wannerer een restaurant stopt blijft het adres gewoon bestaan. Dan svp alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99196587

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-12 22:18:50+00:00): Je hebt de volkstuin uitgebreid maar nu ligt wel bos en volkstuin als vlak op elkaar.
Best lastig al die landuse. 
eggie
eggie (2021-02-12 22:36:11+00:00): Er lag zoveel dezelfde landuse op elkaar dat ik e.e.a. heb aangepast. De adresnode heb ik hersteld.
MVG
eggie
GhostOfSparta (2021-02-13 07:31:56+00:00): Szia. Szerintem rossz templom misrerendje lett társítva az objektumhoz. Ha jól láttam Szada település Szent János temploma lett rögzítve.