piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 10:44:24+00:00): This one has happened before, and is tricky. The reason for not using `=motorway` is this is  not Tunnel Area, to conform to local culture, despite the norm elsewhere. Not using =`trunk` is because I don't want people changing them to `=motorway`, but still show this is restricted. 
I would appreciate if you say something more useful than "minor change".
FraukeLeo (2024-05-29 19:23:03+00:00): Hallo pd8JUHyoPJ, du hast am Kreisverkehr Abbiegebeschränkungen „nur rechts“ eingebaut. Das ist gut gemeint, aber unnötig, denn das ergibt sich aus der Einbahnrichtung des Kreisels sowieso. Bitte künftig darauf verzichten und Abbiegebeschränkungen nur da setzen, wo sie nötig sind.
pd8JUHyoPJ (2024-06-02 06:23:59+00:00): Hallo, bin mir da nicht so sicher, ob da nicht so manches Navi "am Ende der Straße wenden" sagt. Jeder vernünftige Fahrer würde das nicht tun - aber was passiert da beim autonomen Fahren? M.E. sollte da OSM "nur rechts" automatisch vorgeben - lässt aber "Wenden" zu. Das Problen tritt auch bei einer T-Kreuzung auf eine Einbahnstraße auf. Der Mensch sieht da ein geometrisches Objekt - das Navi sieht nur zwei Linien und einen Punkt als Kreuzung. Grüße Rolf
FraukeLeo (2024-06-02 07:29:44+00:00): Ein Kreisel bietet selbst eine so attraktive Wendemöglichkeit (einfach einmal rumfahren), dass kein Navi, das seine Sinne beisammen hat, eine Wendung direkt an der Kreiseleinfahrt vorschlagen würde, statt den Kreisel dafür zu nehmen.

An welche Navis denkst du denn in deinen Fallbeispielen? Zwar sagen Navis gern "bei der nächsten Gelegenheit wenden", wenn man von der Route abgewichen ist (eine berechnete Route hat höchst selten Wendungen drin), aber überlassen es dann sinnvollerweise dem Fahrer. Ich kenne kein Navi, das eine Wendung "auf dem Punkt" verbindlich vorgibt.

Wenn es für eine Abbiegebeschränkung keinen realen Nutzen gibt (weil es ohne sie ebensogut funktioniert), bin ich für das KISS-Prinzip: so wenig Komplexitäten in die Daten wie möglich, weil das immer Fehlerquellen bei der nächsten Bearbeitung sind.

Steht so auch im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction unter "Wichtig zu beachten" Punkt 2 :)
pd8JUHyoPJ (2024-06-02 08:08:34+00:00): OK - hast mich überzeugt...
FraukeLeo (2024-06-02 08:14:35+00:00): Du hast mich aber auch ins Nachdenken gebracht … aber ich glaube, solche Beschränkungen werden wir auch in Zukunft mit selbstfahrenden Autos nicht brauchen. Fahrende KIs treffen Entscheidungen nicht so simpel.
Frans S (2022-04-21 09:12:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.

You marked this task as complete mapped despite there are more buildings to be mapped.
Since you are a very new mapper, please just stop mapping when you arer ready and leave it to other mappers to complete and finish the task.

Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119978810
mavl (2022-05-20 16:02:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 10:31:13+00:00): Please don't upload your personal data. This is a public map data database.
iandees (2022-04-21 15:24:44+00:00): Thanks for changing the names here and coming back to expand Ln to Lane. Can you also expand the N to North, please?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119979204
Georg Essl (2022-04-21 15:37:38+00:00): Done. Thanks for letting me know.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:02:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Branko Kokanovic (2022-04-22 14:00:59+00:00): zamenio si granicu Kraljeva pogresnom granicom. Tacnije, koristio si granicu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929170531, a ja sam sad vratio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053955952. Cisto da ti kazem, znam da nije namerno, ali rekoh - mozda ti pomogne da provalis sta si radio:)
limes11 (2022-04-28 17:33:03+00:00): Revertiert. Das ist kein Eigenname des abgerissenen Gebäudes und hat hier nichts verloren.
Mudumala (2022-04-29 11:33:13+00:00): Hi Pertanian12,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this region, I observed that one of the ways such as way 1053515323 is created as Footway which is Isolated (Not having connectivity on either side of the way). Could you please verify and add connectivity if available as we are not able to verify from aerial imagery. If this footway is not connected to any road network, no one will be able to route through this. 

Regards
Rajeswari
mavl (2022-05-20 16:02:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_8101879 (2022-05-01 21:17:16+00:00): Hi,

what the name Eucalipytus means (way 575724849), this word is not found with Bing or Google.

Do you mean Eucalyptus ?

Best regards
tastrax (2022-04-27 04:11:51+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mavl (2022-05-20 16:02:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Jillis inactivE (2022-04-21 10:09:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3145499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3145500
Leo Slager (2022-04-21 15:16:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
user_5359 (2022-04-22 15:14:35+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the relation. Did you mean name:be-x-old instead of be-x-old? There are tweleve relation with this type of error.
Snalla (2022-04-25 11:03:43+00:00): Hi user_5359,
Thank you for identifying this. I have corrected all the 12 relations.
 Happy mapping.
Regards,
Snalla.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:02:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
MxxCon (2022-04-21 06:32:31+00:00): Hello.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description, the description field must never be used for advertising or promotional messaging. As such it's going to be removed. I also fixed up format of the phone number and moved relevant part into branch tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119982976
abakus_uploader (2022-04-21 22:31:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
johnarupire (2022-04-21 19:51:31+00:00): Hola Hanz, recuerda que siempre debes hacer un comentario sobre los cambios que realizas en el mapa. Hay varios conjuntos de cambios que no tienen uno. Por favor, revisa eso. Saludos.
literan (2022-04-21 18:34:32+00:00): теги bicycle=yes
foot=yes лишние. Почищу.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:02:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-04-22 15:35:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053534404. What is the meaning of this tags?
    taskId = 6
    taskIsSquare = false
    taskStatus = READY
    taskX = 157930
    taskY = 130133
    taskZoom = 18

Don't add any private working objects to the production database!
krusefahrer (2022-04-25 15:12:44+00:00): Dear Mr. Hiausirg,

why have you repeated the mistake at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52069713/history once again?
zluuzki (2022-04-25 19:06:38+00:00): What mistake do you mean?
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 10:08:19+00:00): 1. I don't you commenting at me first before reverting. Do you know how it's done 
2. Please don't confuse Expo Promenade and Golden Bauhinia Square. If you have a better idea of their extent, change it.
3. What is the purpose of breaking the `=multipolygon` up?
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 10:09:18+00:00): 3. You need to respect One Feature One Object. You should not break up a  facility or area by when it opens. Sub-areas should be used.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 10:10:14+00:00): 3. Also you have not handled the different theme areas here.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 10:36:25+00:00): 4. As I had told you, please don't use `highway=` + `construction=yes` in lieu of `highway=construction` + `construction=`.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 12:43:18+00:00): 5. It's `start_date=`, not `opening_date=`
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 12:43:57+00:00): 6. Please don't duplicate the feature on the relation's members
Kovoschiz (2022-04-21 12:49:34+00:00): 7. The west and east part are opened in stages as well, so this is a never-ending hole to dive in.
Mudumala (2022-04-29 11:31:15+00:00): Hi Ng_679_GEOG281,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this region, I observed that one of the ways such as way 1053536388 is marked as a path in between residential houses  and also added a tag as layer=-1, it is hard to verify this data via satellite imagery, but wanted to check with you the source of the edit and if the layer=-1 tag is intentional? Thank you!  . 


Regards
Rajeswari
abakus_uploader (2022-04-21 22:31:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
szydzio (2022-06-21 13:44:32+00:00): Hej! Nr dróg powiatowych wpisujemy do unsigned_ref. Prośba o niedublowanie nr dróg w tagu name i/lub ref.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:02:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
mavl (2022-05-20 16:02:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
abakus_uploader (2022-04-21 22:31:43+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gscholz (2022-07-07 05:33:39+00:00): Hi Heritiana10,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=48.04972&lat=-22.07888&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119987913

As you may know, not connected ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
luiswoo (2022-04-21 10:52:21+00:00): Нумерация домов

Номер дома (вносится в addr:housenumber=*) кроме цифр может включать буквы и другие символы. Корпус и строение дома следует указывать в формате "48А к2 с1 соор3 фл1" - дом номер 48А, корпус 2, строение 1, сооружение 3, флигель 1

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:Addresses&uselang=ru#.D0.9D.D1.83.D0.BC.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.BE.D0.B2
kschke (2022-04-21 11:07:36+00:00): спасибо, исправлю
hanchao (2022-04-22 08:06:42+00:00): 恶意删除数据。已回退
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120035685
chris66 (2023-02-08 07:35:00+00:00): Hi, deine Hausnummern im Lindenstieg weichen ziemlich von den amtlichen Hausnummern ab, wo hast Du deine her?

Grüße
Ropino (2023-02-08 08:57:56+00:00): Hallo,
da ich keine Hausnummern ergänzt/verändert habe, kann ich deine Frage leider nicht beantworten.
VG
user_5359 (2022-04-22 16:36:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053552201. You forgot to add any tag to this way!
nona mostafa (2022-04-28 09:52:27+00:00): Hello user_5359;
I fixed these issues in this area and added all highway tags on all streets.
Sincerely,
nona mostafa
abakus_uploader (2022-04-21 22:31:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Dimitar155 (2022-04-21 10:49:12+00:00): Здравей Боби,

Номерата на блоковете се записват като номер на улица, а ж.к.-то в addr:place (предполагам че си видял че съм добави този таг на блоковете). Евентуално ако блока има някакво име (примерно бл. Вихрен) името се записва в addr:housename. Оставам на разположение ако имаш някакви въпроси.

Поздрави,
Митко
hanchao (2022-04-22 08:01:54+00:00): 可以加上类型。比如建筑物，学校等等

你和小丽丽是一家的吧
Hunte (2022-04-21 08:51:51+00:00): Hi,
Das Restaurant gibt's nicht mehr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721894371
This Restaurant is closed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6721894371
hanchao (2022-04-22 07:50:33+00:00): 可以加上类型。比如建筑物，学校等等
user_2066394 (2022-04-24 15:50:22+00:00): Was ist mit den Zufahrtswegen passiert?
flo2154 (2022-04-21 14:18:37+00:00): Ist das denn richtig? Woher stammt die Information? Sollte "Baldham Dorf" nicht stattdessen von "addr:city" in "addr:suburb" verschoben werden?

Und müsste dann das gleiche auch für die restlichen Gemeindeteile gelten? Also z.B. Parsdorf: "addr:city=Vaterstetten, addr:suburb=Parsdorf"? Das erscheint mir falsch.
flo2154 (2022-04-21 14:19:39+00:00): Tut mir leid, ich habe in meinem dritten Satz die beiden Tags verdreht. Ich meinte: Sollte "Baldham Dorf" nicht stattdessen von "addr:suburb" in "addr:city" verschoben werden?
Ropino (2022-04-21 17:52:16+00:00): Hi, ich habe addr:city auf "Vaterstetten" gesetzt, weil sich dies u.a. durch die boundary/admin_level=8 ergibt.
+ die Webseiten:
https://www.vaterstetten.de/Willkommen/Vaterstetten-im-Ueberblick/Geschichte.htm?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldham
---
addr:suburb: 
Da habe ich zwischen "Baldham" und "Baldham Dorf" geschwankt und letztlich von den vielen vorhandenen übernommen+ passt dies auch zum place-node.
---
Das gleiche/ähnliche könnte man auch für weitere addr:city/suburb machen... 
...braucht halt alles Zeit und Lust. ;) 
VG Robert
kortgodt (2022-05-19 09:45:20+00:00): SÅ vidt jeg kan se er del af denne "eng" udlagt til skov hvilket også ser ud til at være tilfældet ud fra SDFE
paunofu (2022-05-07 00:37:45+00:00): Buenas noches,
voy ha revertir este conjunto de cambios pues has suprimido una parta importante de la relación de rutas de autobús
trigpoint (2022-04-23 20:21:44+00:00): This relation is for the adin area City of Leicester, yet you have added a large number of duplicates which simply say Leicester. There is no point adding duplicate name tags.

Please could you also use meaningful human readable changeset comments which describe what you have done so that the local community can read what you have done. A maaningless hastag totally fails at this.

Were these edits discussed withe the UK community?
Richard (2022-04-25 11:09:46+00:00): Indeed, this is just wrong: the "City of Leicester" administrative area is not the same as "Leicester".

@borovac, UK administrative boundaries and naming is really complex, and I'd suggest it's probably not the easiest thing to tackle from Serbia unless you have a full understanding of them. I wouldn't try to fix tagging of Serbian administrative boundaries!
borovac (2022-04-27 14:08:38+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your feedback.

@trigpoint I wanted to add different language names and mistakenly corrected wikidata. I see how some of the names can feel redundant having the same form. I reverted my changes so that they don’t make a confusion and will try to be more descriptive in my comments in the future.

@Richard I agree that UK boundaries can seem complex. It was not my intention to disrupt it in any way, but just to enrich it with additional information. I will refrain from adding any information to boundaries in the UK for now. As you mentioned, local knowledge is very important, so I will happily align my mapping to guidelines of the community. If you have some additional pointers or have recommendations on where to get more information, please let me know.
trigpoint (2022-04-28 12:02:32+00:00): Thank you for your reply, however you have not answered my question as to where these edits were discussed with the UK community, I would expect a minimum of a post to the talk-gb mailing list.

You do seem to be adding pointless duplicate name tags, which just adds clutter and makes it harder for unpaid mappers who look after their own local areas to spot the important tags, OSMs most valuable resource are these unpaid volunteers.

You don't need to add translated names where they don't differ from the main name tag, any computerised data consumer should be able to use the name tag if there is no language specific name.

What source are you using for these edits?

Cheers Phil
borovac (2022-04-28 14:06:25+00:00): Hi Phil,

Apologies for not responding. We regularly always contact the community prior to any editing, but due to a small miscommunication this was not done on talk-gb. We are correcting this issue now and are also communicating with members of OSM Data Working Group to reformat and add any missing information on our editing.

When it comes to names, we’ve used Wikipedia information and various sources for additional checks. We’ve had some community comments and as of yesterday stopped adding any names at all.

Hope this answers your questions and thanks for your comments.

All best borovac
SomeoneElse (2022-04-28 16:12:32+00:00): Hello borovac,
I know that you've already removed the data added here, but For the avoidance of doubt, you can't use wikipedia as a direct source of names as its licence is not compatible with OpenStreetMap.
You may, of course, be able to use whatever source wikipedia's data was copied from, if that licence is compatible.
Best Regards,
Andy
borovac (2022-04-29 11:40:45+00:00): Hi Andy,

Thanks for the clarification. Since we’ve seen a lot of possible misinterpretations, we’ve stopped adding different language names for now. If it’s ok with you, I, or some of my colleges may contact you directly in the future if we encounter any ambiguities regarding licensing or sources for OSM.

Thank you for your feedback!
All best Milan
skquinn (2022-05-24 19:29:11+00:00): Hi,

This isn't a physically separated left turn lane and so the addition of a secondary_link here was incorrect. I have reverted this change.
vrynkevich_lyft (2022-05-25 09:49:44+00:00): Hi, skquinn. 
My name is Veranika and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
Typically our team doesn't map turn lanes separately without a physical barrier. I made a decision to add this separate left turn for clearer guidance for drivers because there is one on the East Tidwell Road according to the proprietary imagery owned by Lyft, Mappilary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=523679259013151&focus=photo&lat=29.845525&lng=-95.391158&z=17) and Bing aerial imagery. But you are right perhaps this barrier is not significant enough to separate it with a link. Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause.
user_5359 (2022-04-25 18:56:56+00:00): Hello! Regardless of the fact that admin_level is actually only intended for political borders: the tag admin_level=1 is defined for cross-country constructs. Please reduce the value accordingly.
CPWeb-CEF (2022-04-26 09:49:16+00:00): Hello, I've changed to admin_level=3.
Thank you.
jleedev (2022-04-21 17:27:46+00:00): Baseball field is the entire area which is already mapped. This is the infield.
stadiaarcadia (2022-04-21 21:02:23+00:00): I've read the infield should look the same as the outfield. Both grass or both part of the sports field. Is there another way to fix this?
jleedev (2022-04-21 21:08:01+00:00): It would be OK to extend the grass multipolygon for all the grass that you see. However, there should be one leisure=pitch that includes the entire area, grass and sand without any holes.
stadiaarcadia (2022-04-22 07:52:45+00:00): I agree.
literan (2022-04-21 18:30:10+00:00): это не имя собственное шлагбаума. Не надо упорствовать, все равно будет исправлено на верный тег
BCNorwich (2022-04-21 13:03:30+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No need for the extra park POI, the name is on the park outline. I've made a few tweaks and squared up things.

Regards Bernard.
Strubbl (2022-04-21 19:41:19+00:00): Hi Moritz, with this changeset you deleted the addresses 74 and 76. Do you know where they are so that we can place them correctly?
Pink Duck (2022-04-21 12:23:40+00:00): Of note, Royal Mail have gone and changed their wording/definitions since I last checked, and lifted what may have been the mistaken text from before. So I no longer take issue with postcodes going on to polygons such as this, but do check buildings to avoid duplicate addressing.
Msiipola (2022-04-24 07:15:48+00:00): Här har du ändrat till residential, vilket måste vara fel. Dessa vägar är bara cykel/gångvägar. Inte bilvägar.
user_5359 (2022-04-22 15:20:40+00:00): Hello! Please don't overpaint existing buildings! Please always the key building.