piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2016-09-24 19:20:13+00:00): W tym miejscu jest skrzżowanie a nie Osiem Misek.
dvdhoven (2016-11-03 06:56:52+00:00): Het is niet de bedoeling adresgegevens op de pandcontouren te plaatsen.
Binnen NL is afgesproken de adresgegevens op zogenaamde adresnodes te plaatsen. Deze worden vanuit de BAG geïmporteerd.
Ook het zelf tekenen van gebouwen is niet gewenst. Alleen in uiterste noodgevallen.
Gebouwen worden in NL vanuit de BAG geïmporteerd. Daarvoor is een plugin voor de editor JOSM beschikbaar. Alleen deze verkeert nog in een beta status.
Daarom is er een kleine testgroep mappers samengesteld, die de imports verzorgen.
Aanvragen voor imports kun je doen op het forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52973
Als men zelf gebouwen gaat tekenen en plaatsen, wordt het rommelig en valt er ook nauwelijks meer te controleren tov de BAG.
Het gebouw Linquenda Domus heb ik opnieuw uit de BAG geïmporteerd met alle adresnodes.
Het gebouw met adres 21 staat in de BAG op bouwvergunning verleend,
Die zal ik ook importeren, de plek die de BAG aangeeft is anders.
Eigenlijk worden panden met bouwvergunning verleend, niet geïmporteerd, behalve als buiten geconstateerd is, dat het pand in bouw of gereed is.
Het andere pand zonder adres en het pand met nummer 33 staan beide niet in de BAG
Als deze panden al wel in bouw of misschien gereed zijn, dan is het zinvol dit terug te melden aan de BAG ambtenaar van de gemeente.
Dit kan door een terugmelding te doen in de BAG viewer.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
aceman444 (2016-09-27 18:38:50+00:00): Zdravim, tie male kniznice nebudu nahodou toto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase ?
Peter Vojtek (2016-09-27 18:41:05+00:00): ano, to vyzera vhodnejsie nez amenity:library. zmenim to. vdaka za upozornenie.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-25 13:28:58+00:00): It's just spam; I'd delete it.
katpatuka (2017-01-27 13:29:03+00:00): thanks for editing the Cấm Sơn Lake :)
marczoutendijk (2019-07-19 13:58:11+00:00): Hi,
You have used place=place for Kelterplatz.
Maybe you meant place=locality?
See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Place
Jojo4u (2019-07-19 17:40:56+00:00): Thanks, I meant place=square and corrected it already.
eggie (2018-03-08 18:46:05+00:00): alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 05:35:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672785 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
mueschel (2016-09-29 13:01:52+00:00): Hi,
you invented the tag 'chimneys:colour' - we didn't have this in the database yet. I think the singular  'chimney:colour' is better. Would you mind changing this? In fact, the key 'chimney' already exists.
Jan
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:36:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42623136 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42402502, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Capello13 (2016-11-30 17:42:56+00:00): Bonsoir,
Le tag sport=paragliding est déprécié (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dparagliding), à la place il est plutôt conseillé d'utiliser sport=free_flying + free_flying:paragliding=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:sport%3Dfree_flying).
Capello13
SK53 (2016-09-24 17:08:46+00:00): Glad you've not only highlighted problem but worked out how to fix it. For obvious reasons things like this are not stuck out in front of new editors.

One other thing which can be done with these relations is add wikipedia tags of form "wikipedia=en:Mazini Region". These get properly parsed on this website so one can click on them. Mainly this is useful in case other mappers want to check up on a place they're not familiar with: its not meant as dynamic way to look at wikipedia. There are other uses, search uses parameters based on wikipedia articles to weight importance of places & wikidata could be used for things like population.
kickert (2016-09-25 06:26:08+00:00): Thanks for the insight.  Obviously changing major administrative area names is probably not something new editors should be undertaking, although I am glad to know the process, since it also works for smaller areas such as parks.
mueschel (2016-09-25 16:28:04+00:00): Hi Lexa,
I found several (~20) hydrants with a spelling mistake in the keys: 
fire_hydrant city
fire_hydrant housenumber
fire_hydrant street
All these should not have a space, but a ':' . Would you mind correcting this?
Cheers, Jan
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:14:55+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Carnildo (2016-10-14 20:47:47+00:00): The correct tagging for a geyser is "natural=geyser", not "natural=volcano".
user_5359 (2016-09-24 13:24:04+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kann es sein, dass Du beim Sperren des Dattelsieg für Motorfahrzeuge einen Punkt in den Wald verzogen hast? Ich halte eine solche Wegführung für unwahrscheinlich (bitte reinzoomen).
MuellerE (2016-09-25 06:15:07+00:00): Der heutige Weg ist ein alter Wirtschaftsweg der in zwei Serpentinen einen sehr steilen Abhang hinaufführt. Das gesamte Gelände ist bewaldet, sodass der Weg auf dem Satellitenbild nicht genau zu erkennen ist. Früher konnte der Weg mit kleinen landwirtschaftlichen Fahrzeugen befahren werden. Seit geraumer Zeit ist er durch Poller in der Straße für Fahrzeuge aller Art gesperrt und nur noch zu Fuß oder mit dem Fahrrad zu nutzen.
user_5359 (2016-09-26 10:28:48+00:00): Ich habe die Endpunkte des Straßenstück entsprechend mit barrier=bollard ( siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard ) gekennzeichnet.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:59:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mueschel (2016-09-25 16:30:36+00:00): Hi,
this changeset contains 26 ways with the key "cicleway'. Could you correct the spelling -> "cycleway"?

Cheers, Jan
sanjayb (2016-10-04 07:57:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622292 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42404292, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:58:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-16 19:37:50+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
dvdhoven (2016-09-24 18:48:02+00:00): Voor de tweede keer vandaag heb ik weer een bak correctiewerk gedaan.
Forward/backward gebruik je alleen als je 2 eenrichtingroutes hebt, niet bij een tweerichting route, want die wordt dan in 1 richting ontoegankelijk.
Dus forward/backward bij bijvoorbeeld 2 eenrichting fietspaden. Dan leg je eerst de heenrichting in, en daarna de terugrichting vanaf het splitspunt, dus tegen de rijrichting in.
Ook mogen er geen gaten in de routes zitten en geen volgordefouten

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Wippy (2016-09-25 06:13:31+00:00): Nou Dick, bedankt maar weer. Blijkbaar gaat het dus niet zo goed. Ik meende toch echt alles gecontroleerd op te hebben op gaten en volgorde, maar blijkbaar niet genoeg. Forward en backward wist ik niet: weer wat geleerd. Klopten de relaties dit keer wel? 
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Wilbert Steenweg
dvdhoven (2016-09-25 06:40:08+00:00): Hallo Wilbert,

Het is gewoon erg lastige materie.
Het duurt een poosje voor je het in de greep hebt.
De relaties klopten wel.
De meeste problemen waren het forward/backward en een paar gaten.
Verder had je een parkeerplaats in de route 58-66 opgenomen. (Raadhuisplein)
Daar kon je ook niet zoveel aan doen, Een andere mapper had die parkeerplaats op de weg geplakt en dan wordt het erg lastig om zo'n weg nog te selecteren.
Ik heb de parkeerplaats los gemaakt van de weg. Dit soort vlakken en ook de landuse vlakken moet je nooit aan een weg knopen.

Mocht je nog vragen hebben, stuur me dan gewoon een berichtje.
Ik weet ook lang niet alles, maar ik heb inmiddels wel de nodige ervaring.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:58:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Ars-UA (2016-09-24 14:23:06+00:00): Основное название name= должно быть на государственном языке (украинском), name:uk= - тоже украинский, name:ru= - русский. Остальные (английский, белорусский и т.д.) по желанию, но украинский и русский - обязательно. Я поправил https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4416309895#map=19/47.12751/37.50896&layers=D
ConsEbt (2016-10-11 17:07:19+00:00): Hello Rehan727, before we I start changing the E11 back to E 11 I'd like to ask why you think there is no _space_ between the E and the 11. 
Before I started changing E11 to E 11 I checked on wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_11_road_(United_Arab_Emirates)
I also think that the road signed show a space, else E and 11 would be on the same line.

Looking forward to hear your thoughts.
Cheers,
Consebt.
rehan727 (2016-10-12 14:11:47+00:00): Hi Consebt,
 
In OSM I found there were three ways of naming the highways.
 
a)       E-11
b)      E 11
c)       E11
 
I have changed names/references of many E-11 style highways to E11. The reason was that in voice prompts on Garmin this style was pronounced “East11” which is totally misleading. Also I could not find “- “ on any signboard or other maps. So a) is never to be used in my view. With “E11” the voice prompts are appearing correct in Garmin. I did not check the voice prompt with E 11 so cannot say if they will sound correct or not.
 
Regarding b) and c) I think the following
 
-The official signboards are showing both a combination of English ‘E’ and Arabic ’ ﺇ’ 
“E  ﺇ”
  11
and it is not clear if there is a space or not.
 
In Wikipedia there is a space in your link. Also in Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates#Highways this page does not show space so it depends on the person who contributed to the Wikipedia article. 
 
When I look at other maps I note that there is no space in google maps and bing maps. I cannot make a decision overwhelmingly in favour of either option b) or c)  however I am trying to following bing maps http://www.bing.com/mapspreview  and google maps style at present without space as I cannot find an official reference from RTA website.
 
Regards,
Rehan
Aleks-Berlin (2016-09-25 11:08:22+00:00): please do not use empty keys, like ""="text".
I fixed 2 buildings from this changeset. thanks, Alexander
EdLoach (2016-09-26 07:29:43+00:00): I'll blame the new version of Vespucci. Thanks for letting me know - I'll watch out for it happening in future.
carfog81 (2016-09-28 22:32:08+00:00): Esto es realmente un Refugio de montaña (alpine_hut)?
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-30 13:25:49+00:00): You added a tag: name:ar="fuck". Please don't do this again. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49104270
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
mavl (2016-09-25 05:43:27+00:00): Пакет правок добавляет персональную информацию. Изменения отменены.
Omegatherion (2016-09-25 14:07:11+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Omegatherion (2016-09-25 14:07:06+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Omegatherion (2016-09-25 14:06:47+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
opendcc (2016-09-24 19:35:41+00:00): Hallo,

die Fließrichtung geht gelegentlich durcheinander. Bitte noch korrigieren, Danke.
Omegatherion (2016-09-25 14:06:42+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Erelen (2016-09-24 23:08:59+00:00): Аккуратнее, пожалуйста. А то потом приходится убежавшие точки обратно возвращать: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=42413577
Supaplex (2016-10-08 16:51:06+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse (2016-09-30 12:46:05+00:00): Hi,
This is a changeset that covers most of the planet, and the changeset comment doesn't describe what you did.  Instead of saying "osmose errors corrected" if you were to say (for example) "joined two roads where it was clear that they did actually join", and used smaller changeset bounding boxes, people locally would be able to see what had changed where they were, and why.
Best Regards,
Andy
Geofreund1 (2016-09-30 17:27:43+00:00): I suppose this happend because Osmose does not group errors geografically. So if you do not look for every error where exactly it is located, it might happen, that you jump from one end of the world to the other.
So but anyway it was my mistake and should not happen again. I will also try to make the changeset comments more specific.
Omegatherion (2016-09-25 14:06:34+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Omegatherion (2016-09-25 14:06:09+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Omegatherion (2016-09-25 14:05:55+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Omegatherion (2016-09-25 14:05:42+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:38:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
joost schouppe (2016-09-24 17:12:05+00:00): Deleted your node, because the Event Brewery was already added 21 days ago - before your last map update it would seem.
It's also actually called "The Event Brewery", so no need for a name:en=* tag, name=* would be perfectly fine.
maxerickson (2016-09-24 17:46:22+00:00): @joost schoupe, MAPS.ME doesn't allow editing of the  name tag. See https://github.com/mapsme/omim/issues/4149

(I'm not entirely sure of what behavior to expect from each version of the app, but the user doesn't have a lot of control over which tag(s) it stores the name in.
jaakl (2016-09-25 07:30:42+00:00): Thanks! Maps.me now only allows adding name:lang names, which may be for purpose as there was issue of people putting Chinese names to name tag in Europe. And it updates maps with delay, so many redundant edits expected around SotM.
opendcc (2016-09-24 19:29:02+00:00): tunnel=buliding_passage? Ich habe es mal auf culvert geändert.

Servus Wolfgang
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:31:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552891 where the changeset comment is: reverts of further edits in India that were connected to the broken midhu ones
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:31:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552891 where the changeset comment is: reverts of further edits in India that were connected to the broken midhu ones
geri-oc (2016-10-16 15:28:18+00:00): "... amenity=public_building ist veraltet ! habs aber gelasen"

Warum? Dann doch bitte gleich berichtigen building=public.

Fehler oder überholtes kann man beheben, wenn man es bemerkt.
Gruß Gerd
geri-oc (2016-10-16 15:30:47+00:00): Warum diese CS-Beschreibung wenn du es doch geändert hast?
???
Aleks-Berlin (2016-09-24 18:19:57+00:00): opengeodb will have no updates in future (since 2008). some tags lost their need, e.g. :version :auto_update : sort_name :is_in (covers is:in) ==> cleanup these old tags
user_5359 (2016-09-25 06:59:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t use Google to add information to OSM!!
Stan Tomlinson (2016-09-25 14:07:31+00:00): Thanks for the welcome. Acknowledge that I shouldn't use Google. Why?
user_5359 (2016-09-26 10:36:20+00:00): If you know there is school and you use google to search the school homepage to add more information, it is fine.
If you see a building and use google maps to identify the object and then add this to OSM, it is forbidden.
For more details please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1

(or more faster): There are only two rules of OSM are:  a) don't copy from other maps and b) have fun!
Константин Гам (2019-06-16 18:55:54+00:00): Откуда тут футвей то?
Aleks-Berlin (2016-09-24 18:21:10+00:00): opengeodb will have no updates in future (since 2008). some tags lost their need, e.g. :version :auto_update : sort_name :is_in (covers is:in) ==> cleanup these old tags
user_5359 (2016-09-25 07:05:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Three entries with opening_hours=closed?? Exists these objects or not?
djescapes (2016-09-28 17:08:18+00:00): Yes multi-business property. Property listings
olehz (2016-09-25 00:08:19+00:00): у Львівській області за винятком кількох скель не існує нічого подібного, що можна було б позначити цим тегом. це все треба повидаляти, або замінити на natural=earth_bank - бо доходить до ідіотизму. в районі Сколе досі лишилась купа таких скель, а насправді там перепад рельєфу заввишки від сили 2 метри - http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=32425
Myazyk (2016-09-30 21:45:34+00:00): Видаляти не треба, бо там є обриви (не кам'яні, але ґрунтові). Тай тег не для скель, а для ярів, вроді

За цим лінком я вичитав таке: насколько я понимаю, сейчас ситауация такая:
имеем скалистый обрыв - обозначаем natural=cliff
имеем грунтовой обрыв - обозначаем natural=gully
если обрыв проходим (пологий) - не обозначаем никак

earth bank - це не насип?
djescapes (2016-09-28 17:10:58+00:00): La Casita Bonita Inn is OPEN! Booked until April 2017.
highflyer74 (2016-10-12 06:21:32+00:00): Hallo nochmal!

Auch hier noch kleiner Tipp: Der Parkplatz war hier als Node gemappt und mit name=Parkplatz getaggt. Ein fleissiger Mitmapper hat bereits korrigiert.

Bitte denke daran, daß name=* nur für Eigennamen verwendet wird. Die Funktion wird aus den anderen Tags ersichtlich (amenity=parking). Ich habe auch den name=* von der Zuwegung entfernt, denn diese haben meist keinen offiziellen Straßennamen, sondern stellen einfach nur einen Weg dar, der zu irgendetwas führt.

Viele Grüße aus Oberneuland!
Hjart (2016-09-24 20:45:29+00:00): Jeg har justeret dele af sporene her efter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava, som ofte er væsentlig mere pålideligt end enkelte gps-spor.
acsd (2016-10-09 08:42:59+00:00): Привет, после этой правки дворовые проезды отсоединились от улицы Строителей. Уже исправил, впредь будь осторожнее.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 05:35:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672785 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
bkil (2016-11-19 14:57:59+00:00): Hi. I'm delighted to see that you are also using the lunch tag. I have extended the wiki page. Would you be interested in giving some feedback on the discussion page?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lunch
Osm1980 (2016-10-14 06:47:34+00:00): منظورت از wineshopچیه؟
muralito (2016-09-26 13:53:48+00:00): El baldio de la Fac de Ciencias es baldio, no universidad. No importa que pertenezca a una univerdidad, sino la actividad que se hace.
guillermo_dangelo (2016-09-27 20:27:43+00:00): Ok, gracias.
matoori (2019-05-07 01:34:08+00:00): "Hi rlaurentinus,

Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 444186448
way 444186446
way 444186447
way 444834065
way 444186445
way 444186444
classified as un-classified. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

Thanks in Advance."
saintam1 (2016-09-26 12:16:26+00:00): Hello,

This seems to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4382262618 ?
muralito (2016-09-26 11:20:16+00:00): ¿Cerró esta sucursal del scotiabank?
guillermo_dangelo (2016-09-26 13:20:55+00:00): Exacto, cerró hace más de un mes.
Saludos.
muralito (2016-09-26 13:47:33+00:00): Que diferencia de prensa, dicen de cerrar alguna del BROU y sale en todos lados, cierra una privada y nadie se entera...
guillermo_dangelo (2016-09-27 20:26:39+00:00): Jaja, salado. Igual voy a chequear en la semana, porque creo que se mudaron cerquita.
hans-mueller (2016-10-27 18:30:16+00:00): Dort steht kein Max Bahr, sondern ein Bauhaus. Bitte mach Deine Änderung rückgängig.
derredu (2016-10-28 07:05:03+00:00): Stimmt, Danke für den Hinweis, revert durchgeführt
DaCor (2016-10-08 02:36:39+00:00): Hi Dara, you added the node with the physio but its currently loctated in the middle of the turning circle. Can you edit it to refine the location, or even better, draw the building its in and move the mode so it sits inside the buidling. Need help? Just respond here
zstadler (2018-04-24 09:50:24+00:00): Hello Mr Massri,
What is the source for these changes in the administrative boundaries of Jerusalem?
For example, the govmap.gov.il boundaries at
https://goo.gl/taHm8X
look like the boundary deleted in this edit, rather than the fixed boundaries.
Mr Massri (2018-04-24 12:48:36+00:00): Hi Zeev,
This is the source: http://www.mavat.moin.gov.il/MavatPS/Forms/SV4.aspx?tid=4&et=6&pl_id=6vCdEltSxBXolVWik2mbMkE6nFB9Ea509%2becrU2xZk5TQMOGU4%2fWV9g0v4dj6PfwbW0CIhH9CFot4R2XoEa0VSFSGd6fdTEd1iCM928%2bz08%3d
BTW, I see the boundaries were updated in this source since I've made this changes.