piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-10-17 10:54:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Tall building is mapped incorrect. Map the rooflines and move the whole to the footprint.
See this picture
https://drive.google.com/file/d/19jmTiY4TvG8chxZbpWgB6Zv5_Iq5eOL8/view?usp=sharing




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127321216
Strubbl (2022-10-10 19:39:05+00:00): Änderungen ausgehend von Salzburg vorgenommen
willkmis (2022-10-11 11:59:54+00:00): I've added construction: prefixes to the route relations you added here for the Aviation-Westchester portion of the K line to indicate they're not operational routes. Since they were otherwise tagged the same except for opening_date, most data consumers wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the operating and not-yet-open portions.
user_2066394 (2022-10-11 15:26:01+00:00): 17 ist gut aus der Hüfte :-D
map per (2022-10-12 10:11:39+00:00): Ja, hauptsache die beiden Treppenteile haben zusammen 25 Stufen
user_2066394 (2022-10-12 10:49:33+00:00): Im unteren Abschnitt sind das 13, im oberen Abschnitt bräuchte man dann  rechnerisch und gezählt 12.
map per (2022-10-12 20:31:21+00:00): Die Treppe ist ja zweigeteilt, weil ein Teil der Treppe im Tunnel liegt. 
Vier Stufen sind im Tunnel, der Rest ist nicht überdacht (survey), habs entsprechend korrigiert
user_2066394 (2022-10-12 20:42:56+00:00): Einwandfrei
habi (2022-10-10 19:54:31+00:00): Sorry for the big changeset area, had an issue with OrganicMaps authentication to OSM…
InsertUser (2022-10-13 07:27:38+00:00): The original mapped address what's meant to be what's on the sign (GL1 2XG) as of the original upload date. Addr tags are generally for postal addresses when differey and this one is non-geographic hence being on the node and not the building. This change will cause wrong delivery.
eastender (2022-10-14 15:10:12+00:00): Thank you for the comments. I have found that PO Box addresses are not often mapped in OSM, but when they are mapped, they invariably exist at the delivery point. It seems wrong and misleading to use addr: to map a PO Box Address at a location that isn’t the delivery point (in this case mapping a Gloucester delivery point in Cheltenham). Also, in this particular case, the postcode of GL1 2XG appears to be an invalid postcode, albeit the court advertises this postcode as part of its PO Box address. However, I take your point about map users possibly viewing this node and not appreciating that the court has advertised a PO Box address for its address to receive post. So, I have revised the note tag to orient it towards map users and to echo the PO Box address, albeit I still think the postcode is wrong.
InsertUser (2022-10-14 20:26:08+00:00): Cheers, I have a picture of the sign so might add an `addr:full` too as that is mentioned on the wiki for unusual addresses and specifically mentions mismatched postcodes. The only issue is that the full correspondence address needs an update for the new monarch.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-10 11:02:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36901365/history has office = 6 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
ainki (2025-12-10 11:44:13+00:00): Hi! This being over 3 years old changeset I can only speculate that I probably tried to change the building key to office but accidentally added it as a new tag and the 6 was prefilled on JOSM value field.
ainki (2025-12-10 11:50:58+00:00): I have now removed the office tag from the object.
MxxCon (2022-10-12 04:56:53+00:00): Hello.
Could you please explain why did you map that this bus stop has tactile paving? As far as I know none of MTA stops do.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127322647
MxxCon (2022-10-12 04:57:55+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag these crosswalks as having crossing islands when satellite imagery doesn't show such?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127322648
Aim311_ (2022-10-10 23:15:08+00:00): Siemasz Maksiu. Omyłkowo przesunąłeś węzeł, wobec czego geometria dróg na parkingu uległa zepsuciu. Mógłbyś poprawić?
Frans S (2022-10-13 11:57:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127323781
iandees (2022-10-10 22:34:43+00:00): Hello! Thanks for adding information to the map. Please take the time to enter a useful comment when you submit a changeset. This helps people understand the changes you're making.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127324686
haavee (2022-12-01 21:04:10+00:00): Siehe die geänderten Relationen, maxspeed=60 wurde hinzugefügt aber das stimmt nicht! Bitte entfernen.
Negjana (2022-12-04 12:40:28+00:00): Hallo! Ja da ist mir ein Fehler passiert, hab die Tags wieder entfernt!
ssundell (2022-10-17 17:54:33+00:00): En ole ihan hirvittävän ihastunut tähän, että metsäautoteitä muutetaan service-tyyppisiksi, kun esim. Wikin sekä englannin- että suomenkielisissä piirto-ohjeissa nuo on nimenomaan mainittu esimerkeiksi highway=track-merkinnälle. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Suomi/Piirto-ohjeet

Samoin tuo tracktype on nähdäkseni ihan hyödyllistä tietoa. Jos se ei pidä paikkaansa, sen voi toki korjata, mutta suora poistaminen tuntuu tiedon hukkaamiselta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127325191
Albe_ (2024-05-23 18:05:44+00:00): Olen samaa mieltä, highway=track sopii paremmin kuin service.
dododont (2024-05-23 22:15:45+00:00): Minä taas olen sitä mieltä, että highway=track on varsin epäonnistunut tyyppi, eikä sitä pitäisi käyttää kuin traktoriurille. Mutta en saa tälle kannatusta, joten mennään sitten enemmistön mukaan. Road ei tarvitsisi tracktype-selvennystä, mutta track:lle se on aivan välttämätön.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
DUGA (2023-02-19 17:36:26+00:00): Who told you this is a government office?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046935701#map=19/41.83631/-75.86407
BáthoryPéter (2023-02-22 10:46:36+00:00): Szia! Ehhez az átépítéshez mi a forrásod? A feltöltéskor megadott Bing műholdképen még nem látszik, interneten pedig nem találok róla hírt. 
A Fakopáncs utca nem ér ki a főútig?

Azért is kérdezem, mert épp a környéken rajzolok és nem szeretnék véletlenül régi állapotot visszaállítani.
Keedav (2023-02-22 19:39:20+00:00): Helló, Halápon lakom, és igen a Fakopáncs utca már nem ér ki.

2022 márciusán készült el a 48-as számú főút felújítása, melynek része volt a halápi becsatlakozások megszüntetése.
https://www.dehir.hu/debrecen/harmincezer-hajdu-bihari-varta-elkeszult-a-48-as-fout-felujitasa/2022/03/30/
BáthoryPéter (2023-02-23 21:03:51+00:00): Köszi a választ!

Nem volna kedved Halápot felházszámozni? Én most rendbe raktam a környéken a felszínborítást (erdők, szántók, tanyák, stb.), de helyismeretem nincs. Pedig biztos ezer apróságot fel lehetne még rakni a térképre.
Ha van kedved hozzá, szívesen segítek.
LeJoshMont (2022-10-10 22:21:16+00:00): This was not a node point of a residential home address. Not sure why it carried over my note from my last edit.
Scottie0001 (2022-10-10 23:56:51+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I would like to make you aware that each changeset should be made in one country or one city to reduce the size of the changeset. You can find further information in the below link:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
ChehrehBargi (2022-10-13 05:20:04+00:00): سلام
کاربر @sgalaxya71silver
چندیدن بار این کار را تکرار کرده اید. از اتصال این کوچه تصاویر مپیلاری هم اضافه کرده ام. اتصال این کوچه به خیابان دارای محدودیت است. اگر باز هم ثبت مرا خراب کنید مجبورم گزارش کنم.
باسپاس
ChehrehBargi (2022-10-13 05:25:49+00:00): Hello
User @sgalaxya71silver
You have repeated this several times. In change packages 125030617, 125982029, and 127326421, you have ruined my registrations and I have returned them again. I have also added pictures from the connection of this alley. The connection of this alley to the street is limited. If you ruin my registration again, I will have to report you.
Thanks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-10 23:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127327041 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some recent edits by joserrg12 following their refusal to engage with the community. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks. Depending on discussion, more reverts may be needed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-10 23:09:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127327041 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some recent edits by joserrg12 following their refusal to engage with the community. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks. Depending on discussion, more reverts may be needed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-10 23:09:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127327041 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some recent edits by joserrg12 following their refusal to engage with the community. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks. Depending on discussion, more reverts may be needed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-10 23:09:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127327041 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some recent edits by joserrg12 following their refusal to engage with the community. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks. Depending on discussion, more reverts may be needed.
PT-53 (2022-10-12 07:45:50+00:00): Hallo Morpheus0209,
Du hast in den letzten Tagen in diesem und anderen Änderungssätzen mehrere POIs mit jeweils dem Merkmal
amenity=clinic
neu angelegt:
- https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mGC
Das sind doch nicht alles eigenständige Kliniken sondern nur Abteilungen / Einrichtungen des ZFP, oder ?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-10-23 06:56:22+00:00): Hallo Morpheus0209, 
ich würde mich noch über eine Antwort freuen.
Grüße
Morpheus0209 (2022-10-23 08:15:50+00:00): Hallo ja das ist eine Klinik aber alles selbstständige Abteilungen die nichts mit einander zu tun haben. 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen und einen schönen Tag
PT-53 (2022-10-23 09:15:05+00:00): Hallo Morpheus0209, - amenity=clinic
steht für eine "Klinik" und nicht für Abteilungen davon.
Da es also in Bad Schussenried nur eine Klinik (das ZfP) gibt, sollte in OSM auch nur ein Eintrag mit
- amenity=clinic
vorhanden sein und nicht mehrere.

Die verschiedenen Abteilungen können mit den verschiedenen Fachbereichen einer Universität verglichen werden. Diese werden auch nicht jeweils als Universität eingetragen.Wiki:Siehe
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Duniversity

Abgesehen davon dürfte clinic wohl falsch sein. Clinic steht in OSM für  "Einrichtungen zur ambulanten oder teilstationären Betreuung"
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dclinic

amenity=hospital dürfte wohl eher passend sein.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dhospital

Das neuere healthcare-Schema ist detailierter und besser skalierbar.
Schau Dir das mal an:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:healthcare

Grüße
PT-53 (2022-10-30 09:16:26+00:00): Hallo Morpheus0209, 
überarbeitest Du Deine Engaben noch oder soll ich diese einfach löschen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-11-06 07:58:16+00:00): Keine Reaktion mehr.
Schade
falsche Verwendung amenity=clinic gelöscht
Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-10 23:06:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-10 23:09:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 127326567, 127326657, 127326729, 127326746, 127326793, 127326855.
mariotomo (2022-10-11 14:21:33+00:00): hola. te olvidaste mencionar la fuente de esta información. en el pasado, contribuiste trazas Mapillary.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-16 11:23:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127611592 where the changeset comment is: Removing some made-up names. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6452
leile2 (2023-09-08 00:04:41+00:00): يا ابو بشار ليش ما انت لي مثل ما انت لغيري وليش ما انت تدور بعدي مثل ما انت تدور لغيري الله عيجعلك الجذم الله يجعلك جذم على ما انت تنكر وعلى ما انت تخونني وعلى ما انت دخدعني ودخدع كل من دريبك وعلى ما انت حالي على الناس كولهم وشوعه عليا ألعن واقبح وأشطن من الشيطان الرجيم
leile2 (2023-09-08 00:05:46+00:00): يا ابو بشار الله يجعلك الجذم عليك وعلى من خلفوك
Diacritic (2022-10-11 10:34:43+00:00): Hi Ant!

Thank you for your contributions.

Unfortunately, the license for MetroMap is incompatible with OpenStreetMap's license, and it cannot be used when contributing to OSM.

Specifically, Terms of Use (https://metromap.com.au/documents/Aerometrex_Data_Licence_Agreement.pdf) states "You may incorporate data extracted from the Products in documents 
(e.g. project deliverables, reports, maps, brochures and other 
printed or Digital material) for any purpose as long as these 
documents are not offered for resale to third parties or otherwise 
distributed to third parties for monetary value. To avoid doubt, you 
may use such data extracted from the Products in perpetuity after 
the expiry of any licence to the Products, provided that such use 
remains in accordance with the terms and conditions contained 
herein.

We try and keep the list of valid sources up to date here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources

Dian.
AgusQui (2022-10-13 04:29:18+00:00): estas poniendo mal el valor de diameter, no puede ser 300 o 400 metros
AgusQui (2022-10-13 04:30:49+00:00): no dije nada, acabo de leer la wiki que indica que es milimetros, no metros
Zalitoar (2022-10-13 07:08:36+00:00): Yo pensé lo mismo hasta que leí la wiki jaja
ڕاستی (2022-10-11 22:21:49+00:00): برا لەبەر چ ئەو ژمارانەی سەر شەقامەکانت سڕیوەتەوە؟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127330628
LockOnGuy (2022-10-12 00:03:17+00:00): Hi, read the changeset comment. Those are not street numbers, these are district numbers only without the alley number.      
I’ve sent a message 2 weeks ago, read this: https://i.ibb.co/Vpvf06Y/2-FA630-CD-6-FA4-43-F3-9-A20-151-B8961590-D.png
LockOnGuy (2022-10-12 00:08:51+00:00): Here is the text in the picture if someone want to translate:        
     
مرحباً،

بخصوص طرق اربيل، لاحظت انك قمت باضافة الكثير الكثير من اسماء الطرق الغير مكتملة. بحيث تقوم بكتابة رقم المحلة فقط بدون رقم الزقاق. اتوقع انك قمت بذلك لعدم توفر رقم الزقاق لديك، ومن الممكن اضافته لاحقاً حسب رأيك اتوقع.

ولكن هذا يعتبر خطأ كبير جداً. ولاسباب كثيرة جداً، وسوف اذكر بعضها:

1- بعض المواقع تقوم بجلب اسم الطريق الذي يضاف لاول مرة ولاتقم بتحديثه بعدها في المستقبل. وهذا الشيء للاسف واجهناه في بغداد مثلا مع خرائط ابل، 
مثلا هذه الشوارع في خرائط ابل التي تعتمد على بيانات الشارع المفتوح تظهر الزقاق فقط: 
https://i.ibb.co/CWCZTbc/image.png 
رغم تحديثها للمحلة والزقاق في خرائط الشارع المفتوح: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4387378 
وتطبيقات اخرى ايضا تعتمد على بيانات الشارع المفتوح.

2-وجود رقم المحلة فقط في الاسم الخاص للشارع يجعل من الصعب للمحررين معرفة الشوارع التي لاتحتوي على رقم الزقاق لاضافته وجعله كاملاً.

3- وجود رقم المحلة فقط سوف يجعل الطريق الغير مكتمل لايظهر في الادوات التي تعطيك وتظهر لك الشوارع الغير مكتملة باسم. وبذلك لانستطيع معرفة الشوارع التي ليس بها رقم زقاق باستخدام الادوات. 
مثل: 
http://qa.poole.ch/ 
وغيرة مثل ريسولت ماب انمابد و اوفرباس توربو و كيب رايت و اواس موس وووو

4-وجود رقم المحلة فقط في الاسم الخاص للطريق يعتبر خاطئ حسب قوانين الشارع المفتوح. الخاصة بالاسم، حيث ان هذا الاسم الغير مكتمل سوف يكون مكرر بالمنطقة كلها ويعتبر سبام او ك اسم وصفي وليس اسم واقعي للطريق.

سؤال وجواب:

مالحل؟ 
الحل هو ازالة الاسماء الغير مكتملة نهائياً من الاسم العام.

اذا كيف يمكننا ابقاء رقم المحلة في حال الشخص كان يعرف رقم الزقاق فقط؟ 
من الممكن ان نقوم باضافته ك note=district xxx 
حيث ان تاك النوت هو مخصص كملاحظة للمحررين

لماذا لا نقوم باستخدام تاك addr:district بدل تاك النوت؟ 
لان هذا التاك غير مخصص للطرق. ويمكن استخدامه في النقاط والمساحات فقط. يمكنكم مشاهدة Used on these elements 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:district

مارأيك؟

تحياتي
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-09 15:17:41+00:00): Hi, 
you have a broken relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14573688 
can you fix this?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-10-28 22:43:34+00:00): At least one of these is wrong. Please check again. Or I can correct if you're not in the area.
isopeanut (2022-10-29 18:08:50+00:00): Please do, thanks for catching it.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
adrianojbr (2022-10-11 16:56:14+00:00): Olá, Caconog!

Por ser redundante, não há necessidade de incluir landuse=education junto com amenity=school. Um bom uso para essa etiqueta é quando há várias escolas no mesmo terreno, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#V%C3%A1rias_escolas_em_uma_mesma_parcela.

Além disso, para o mapeamento de escolas no Brasil, foi aprovada uma padronização conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Mapeamento_brasileiro

Abraço!
Caconog (2022-10-11 17:16:42+00:00): Boa tarde Adriano!
Vou corrigir posteriormente, eu utilizei o exemplo "Única escola em uma única parcela" da wiki, que no desenho explicativo citava o perimetro da escola com amenity e entre parenteses landuse... vou ajustar conforme aprovado brasileiro
adrianojbr (2022-10-12 13:37:18+00:00): Pois é, tem dessas coisas. Realmente o desenho pode dar a entender o que você fez. Mas lendo a documentação de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:landuse%3Deducation fica mais claro que amenity=school já implica a outra, não sendo necessário adicionar.

De todo modo, é o de menos.

Abraço e bom mapeamento!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.