piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VA00 (2023-03-25 05:28:36+00:00): Myślałem, że zarządza tym Nadleśnictwo?
Adam_Piszczek (2023-03-25 16:03:35+00:00): Może to zmieniłem
drivec (2022-05-10 22:16:38+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
porfiriopaiz (2022-04-09 22:50:19+00:00): Hello,

There is a missing tag on stop sign that you added when closing on of my notes.

Please read the official documentation on how to map stop signs in a properly way:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop

Polite as usual,
Porfirio
george1201 (2022-06-02 22:23:32+00:00): Ist bei den Straßen in diesem Gewerbe/Industriegebiet die Zuweisung highway=residential eigentlich passend? Im OSM-Wiki steht dazu "wird für Anliegerstraßen benutzt, die Siedlungsgebiete erschließen". Hier siedelt doch keiner. Das sind doch eher Zufahrtswege zu den Firmen, also highway=service.
Scout Jens (2022-06-03 04:45:18+00:00): Das ist eine gute Frage. Ich würde diese im Forum stellen oder nach entsprechenden ähnlichen Fragen dort suchen. Wenn ich diese neu erstellen würde, dann vermutlich als undefinierte Straße?
george1201 (2022-06-03 21:42:44+00:00): Danke, guter Hinweis. Dann probier ich das mal.
abakus_uploader (2022-04-08 22:32:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
endzi_0 (2022-04-09 10:38:28+00:00): Na wsi nie ma ulic więc pole z nazwą ulicy zostało pozostawione puste
porfiriopaiz (2022-04-08 19:02:26+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OSM.

Could you please, when adding new elements, try to not use all uppercase letters in names?

This should be:

Hospital Regional Nuevo Amanecer

Regards,

Porfirio
JUAN CARLOS CLEY (2022-04-08 19:06:16+00:00): Thank you very much for your recommendation.

Juan Cley
porfiriopaiz (2022-04-10 04:53:31+00:00): Hello Juan,

Thank you so much for the quick response and the actions taken on this.

Happy mapping!

Porfirio
b-jazz (2022-04-13 01:43:15+00:00): Hi Ginger Lover,

Thanks for helping to improve OSM by adding golf courses. The community appreciates it.

I was hoping I could reach out to you and correct the way you are working around bunkers that are in the middle of fairways or roughs. Check out https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050335102 for an example. You are tracing around the "outer" feature, and then making this kind of cul-de-sac where you come towards the bunker and surround it before continuing back out to the enclosing feature.

What you really want to do is combine two different ways (outlines) by creating a "multi-polygon". It is very simple to do. Just draw and tag the inner bunker, and then with a new way, draw the outer fairway/rough and tag it as well. Then select both of those features at the same time by holding down the shift key and clicking each. Then either press "c" to combine/merge them, or right click on either selected why and look for the big "+" in the pop-up panel and select it to merge them both into a multipolygon.

If you have any questions or run into any problems doing this, please reach out and let me know and I'll help you out. Thanks!

Happy Mapping.
Ginger Lover (2022-04-14 11:44:35+00:00): Thanks for your input!  I will try that out the next time I run in to this again.
Allison P (2022-04-08 22:20:30+00:00): Missed a spot! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/642764046
Joseph R P (2022-04-09 17:05:55+00:00): Whoops, thanks for pointing that out. I've just fixed it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:11:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
MxxCon (2022-04-09 04:33:01+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "Manhattan" is not a city name. It is "New York". Additionally, "Manhattan" is not supposed to be part of the street name.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119480567
MxxCon (2022-04-09 04:34:33+00:00): Additionally, DIG is not a food court. iD editor has a preset for DIG which you should've used to set all the correct tags.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119480567
gagnon12 (2022-04-09 08:39:57+00:00): Corrected, sorry about that
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
aTarom (2023-03-18 16:30:20+00:00): Hola, Josepvc,
gracias por editar,
no es correcto Senda de Alex en mtb:name?
veo que me has revertido el "name", por qué lo añades de nuevo?
El objetivo es tener la base de datos ordenada para saber que nombres son tradicionales, oficiales, locales, idiomáticos, de actividades de grupos...
Dime si el nombre es o no es del colectivo mtb, y así evitar una guerra de ediciones
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013510280/history
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-30 09:53:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120377830 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some apparently fictional mapping in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5940 et al.
map per (2022-08-07 08:59:16+00:00): Hallo redweizn,

surface sollte hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506131327) meines Wissens nach eher compacted oder fine_gravel sein. surface=gravel wird nur für sehr große Steine / Schotter verwendet.
(Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface#Unbefestigte_Oberfl%C3%A4che)

Viele Grüße
map per
Cristoffs (2022-04-09 11:45:23+00:00): Proszę opisuj dokładniej swoje zmiany.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-30 09:53:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120377830 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some apparently fictional mapping in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5940 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-30 09:53:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120377830 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some apparently fictional mapping in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5940 et al.
PT-53 (2022-04-13 06:21:03+00:00): Hallo ChristopH,
nach Deinen Landuse-Überarbeitungen werden jetzt in keep right mehrere Hinweise "mehrere Punkte an einem Fleck" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=47.73514&lon=9.25304&zoom=19&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=1&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C20

Landuse- und Highway-Knoten sollten nicht übereinander liegen und auch nicht miteinander verschmolzen werden. 
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
ChristophH (2022-04-18 21:24:41+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

hab es in mal mit Changeset 119878779 behoben, hoffe Keepright ist nun glücklich.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-30 09:53:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120377830 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some apparently fictional mapping in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5940 et al.
highflyer74 (2022-04-09 07:47:39+00:00): Hi there!

I noticed you deleted some lines on the golf course here that where tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole.

Could you give some information on why you did that? Your CS comment "edit" does not really tell anything (please take note of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice).

Thank you!
highflyer74 (2022-04-14 06:40:36+00:00): Hello again!

A couple of days ago I wrote the above comment. So far I have not received any reply.

Could you please give some feedback concerning the deletion?

Thank you!
A67-A67 (2022-04-10 19:22:38+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt de waterstructuur beschadigd door het verwijderen van correct ingetekende waterwegen. Daarom teruggedraaid.
eggie (2022-04-10 19:41:51+00:00): Dag P  Wanneer de naam Tuinhuis is dan is het oke, maar wanneer alleen de functie tuinhuis is dan hoor je het niet als naamtag te gebruiken. 
Zier hier wanneer wel of niet name= ...  gebruiken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-10 19:45:44+00:00): Dag P  Je vraagt feedback.. Wanneer het geen bouwterrein is kan het uiteraard weg...  Maar iets is altijd wat... dus wat zou je hier kunnen invullen?
landuse=grass? landuse=industrial? Een parkeerplaats? 
MVG
eggie
Vleesman (2022-04-19 14:55:06+00:00): Hi, het bouwterrein is inderdaad erg veranderd, maar alsnog staat er een terrein van 50 bij 50 meter
eggie (2022-04-19 15:13:02+00:00): Hier zou het gras netjes ingetekend kunnen worden en dan houd je het terrein in het midden over. 
gr eggie
A67-A67 (2022-04-10 19:22:06+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt de waterstructuur beschadigd door het verwijderen van correct ingetekende waterwegen. Daarom teruggedraaid.
iandees (2022-04-08 20:19:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Building polygons should match the outline of the building, not the property boundary. I think you might be mapping something else here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119483259
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse (2022-04-08 20:23:57+00:00): Hello,
You claim to have used Bing Maps Aerial for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050381099 , but this building clearly isn't visible on that imagery.  
What did you use as a source?
Best Regards,
Andy
A67-A67 (2022-04-10 19:21:21+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt de waterstructuur beschadigd door het verwijderen van correct ingetekende waterwegen. Daarom teruggedraaid.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
NicoSa (2022-06-23 05:43:15+00:00): Guten Morgen Moritz,
ich habe gestern versucht den Weg südlich als auch nördlich der alten Bahnstrecke zu passieren. Es ist für Radfahrer als auch für Fußgänger Aufgrund einer Vielzahl umgestürzter Bäume völlig unpassierbar. Schau dir das mal an und ändere den Access bitte.
rik_ (2022-06-23 07:38:24+00:00): (Ich bin zwar nicht angesprochen, aber vielleicht als kurzen Einwurf: die Passierbarkeit (physisch, nicht rechtlich) hat nichts mit `access` zu tun, sondern ggf. eher etwas mit `smoothness`, `hazard` o. Ä.)
NicoSa (2022-06-23 07:44:00+00:00): Ja, entschuldige.
Das meinte ich auch.
Danke Rik
elgolfo (2022-06-24 08:37:18+00:00): Habt ihr euch eigentlich abgesprochen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3236938

Ich schau mir das bei Gelegenheit mal an.
datendelphin (2022-04-17 11:07:16+00:00): I think it's time to remove this residue. That project was voted on and rejected.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Leo Slager (2022-04-08 23:02:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Pprasath (2022-04-09 18:53:23+00:00): Thank you, Sounds good
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-04-09 18:49:17+00:00): Dag Pprasath..

Een outdoor_seating hoort bij een cafe/reataurant.. Dat zal hier niet het geval zijn.
Ik heb er een picnictafel van gemaakt.
MVG
eggie
Pprasath (2022-04-09 18:52:44+00:00): Hi

Great, thanks, I'm new here so didn't know the difference.
eggie (2022-04-09 18:58:02+00:00): Gi .. You may changes the other  outdoor_seating north of the tabletennis?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating

and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table
I'm not sure it's a picnic.. Up to you. :)
Greetz,
eggie
Pprasath (2022-04-09 19:03:06+00:00): I can change it to Bench, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=bench. 
it is a circular bench imo
eggie (2022-04-09 19:03:29+00:00): In case it's not a table tourism=picnic_site is also possible
Pprasath (2022-04-09 19:07:44+00:00): There is no table, only seating so I believe bench suites best : https://i.ibb.co/C8CLBbQ/Screenshot-2022-04-09-210630.png
eggie (2022-04-09 19:10:34+00:00): Sure .. Up to you!
eggie
Blckmgic (2022-04-08 20:32:06+00:00): Correction, no website phone, got in the habit of it autofilling lol. Local real estate information.
Allison P (2022-04-08 21:24:52+00:00): This is definitely not a historic=manor. Also, the description tag is not for advertising, it is for objective feature descriptions. OSM is not for real estate listings. "Dolo Estates" (which is actually "The Dolo Estate") does not belong in OSM. You can add the address tags and the start_date to the building, but everything else should be discarded.
Blckmgic (2022-04-08 22:27:30+00:00): Alright I wasn't sure what to put it under. I typed in estate and that was the closest thing I saw.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
opendcc (2024-09-04 08:38:02+00:00): Bei Kahlschlag, der wieder aufgeforstet wird, bleibt m.E. der Landuse auf forest. Die Fläche wird weiterhin zur Holznutzung verwendet.
k127 (2024-09-09 20:43:33+00:00): Hi, auf welchen way beziehst du dich hier?
opendcc (2024-09-10 04:12:58+00:00): Die 'scrub' nördlich der A3. War da mit dem Rad unterwegs und da wird wieder aufgeforstet.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.