piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Stereo_repair (2017-02-07 03:18:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44987328, 44989084, 44989472, 44989662, 44989933, 44990051, 44990179, 44990281, 44990366, 44990469, 44990616, 44990684, 45040465, 45040697, 45040731, 45040788, 45041095, 45633283, 45646161, 45649120, 45656403, 45700970, 45701029, 45701107, 45701138, 45701165, 45701228, 45701308, 45701357, 45701408, 45701521, 45701571, 45701790, 45701858, 45701910, 45701959, 45701984, 45702009, 45702038, 45702071, 45702086, 45702116, 45702143, 45702171, 45702200, 45702253, 45702305, 45702397, 45702431, 45703011, 45703178, 45703216, 45703237, 45703308, 45703384, 45703539, 45703586, 45703625, 45703678, 45717513, 45718130, 45718178, 45718518, 45718562, 45719310, 45719424, 45725092, 45725196, 45726116, 45726199, 45726261, 45726372, 45726433, 45726484, 45726543, 45726607, 45726670, 45726755, 45726831, 45726988, 45727112, 45727213, 45727283, 45727384, 45727444, 45727504, 45727576, 45727655, 45728478, 45728636, 45728769, 45728776, 45728883, 45729056.
ineiev (2017-02-09 10:17:13+00:00): The data tags pointed to village data; now they point to municipal unit (сельское поселение) this village is the centre of. I'd expect the new tags on the relation of the municipal unit rather than on the village.
nyuriks (2017-02-09 10:37:59+00:00): Sorry, my mistake, fixed. Thanks for catching it!  Please take a look at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/Wikidata_OSM_questions -- see if we can come up with some overall guidelines for wp/wd tags. And see if you can help with https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/OSM_disambigs - there are tons more of the disambigs there. Thanks!
ineiev (2017-02-09 15:17:09+00:00): Gorgeous! I will volunteer for your work if you find people to proofread my Russian www.gnu.org translations :)
nyuriks (2017-03-02 04:01:10+00:00): heh, i'm not it for sure - i haven't written in it for 20+years :)
Stereo_repair (2017-02-07 03:33:01+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44987328, 44989084, 44989472, 44989662, 44989933, 44990051, 44990179, 44990281, 44990366, 44990469, 44990616, 44990684, 45040465, 45040697, 45040731, 45040788, 45041095, 45633283, 45646161, 45649120, 45656403, 45700970, 45701029, 45701107, 45701138, 45701165, 45701228, 45701308, 45701357, 45701408, 45701521, 45701571, 45701790, 45701858, 45701910, 45701959, 45701984, 45702009, 45702038, 45702071, 45702086, 45702116, 45702143, 45702171, 45702200, 45702253, 45702305, 45702397, 45702431, 45703011, 45703178, 45703216, 45703237, 45703308, 45703384, 45703539, 45703586, 45703625, 45703678, 45717513, 45718130, 45718178, 45718518, 45718562, 45719310, 45719424, 45725092, 45725196, 45726116, 45726199, 45726261, 45726372, 45726433, 45726484, 45726543, 45726607, 45726670, 45726755, 45726831, 45726988, 45727112, 45727213, 45727283, 45727384, 45727444, 45727504, 45727576, 45727655, 45728478, 45728636, 45728769, 45728776, 45728883, 45729056.
nevw (2017-02-07 11:52:37+00:00): I had to fix the Percy Isles National Park multipolygon boundary yesterday. 
I think you may have done an edit here too.
I not sure if it is correct, but will be ok for now.
nevw (2017-02-07 11:30:49+00:00): I think you may have broken the Heathcote-Graytown National Park multipolygon with this edit. You appear to have tried to shift or delete a part of the boundary of the park to line up with a road or something.
The park boundary came from  http://parkweb.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/315679/Park-note-Heathcote-Graytown-National-Park.pdf
You should leave these alone unless you have more correct information about the gazetted boundary. They don't necessarily align with trees, roads or even other adjacent boundaries but may be gazetted from time to time with new boundaries
Do you want me to try reverting the changeset to fix it or able you able to  correct it?
nevw (2017-02-08 09:56:20+00:00): I have added the correct boundary for Heathcote-Graytown National Park without reverting your changes.
nevw (2017-02-07 11:35:53+00:00): This edit also appears to have broken the same Heathcote-Graytown National Park multipolygon relation.
nevw (2017-02-08 09:57:09+00:00): I have added the correct boundary for Heathcote-Graytown National Park without reverting your changes.
nevw (2017-02-07 11:39:44+00:00): This edit seems to have had same effect on the Heathcote-Graytown National Park multipolygon relation.
nevw (2017-02-08 09:57:45+00:00): I have added the correct boundary for Heathcote-Graytown National Park without reverting your changes.
nevw (2017-02-07 11:42:38+00:00): again same problem with Heathcote-Graytown National Park mp.
nevw (2017-02-08 09:58:10+00:00): I have added the correct boundary for Heathcote-Graytown National Park without reverting your changes.
Qwertii (2017-02-07 07:45:49+00:00): Woah, how did you add so much so fast?
andygol (2017-02-08 12:40:12+00:00): Hey, astrangel! 
I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ?
Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
portalaventura (2017-02-07 13:30:46+00:00): Ola gabrielpxavier! Verifique essa edicao. Voce adicionou informacoes de um ponto de interesse na rua, inclusive alterando o nome da rua que voce mesmo havia corrigido em changeset anterior. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37017144/history

Aproveito para convida-lo para o grupo de telegram da comunidade OSM no RS: https://t.me/osmrs
smaprs (2017-02-09 14:40:51+00:00): Restaurado
Warin61 (2017-03-16 04:32:12+00:00): Wetland relation 6955233 has errors... you have 
2 ways tagged as outer ways .. that is the outside of the wet land ... yet one of them lies inside the other .. so which is the outer and which is the inner of the wet land ??? 

Or are they both wetland???? I don't know. 
Way: 440320931 lies along side the river 

Way: 440690095 incorporates Way: 440320931 inside it and extends to the road.. 
..
WoodWoseWulf (2017-03-16 20:38:46+00:00): Thank you so much for bringing this to my attention, I must have had a brain fluff or something while editing. I've fixed it now.
chillly (2017-02-09 11:36:20+00:00): Where was this mass edit discussed?

Undiscussed mass edits must be reverted.
parukhin (2017-02-09 17:12:17+00:00): Hi, chillly.
No, these edits were not discussed.
Where can i find definition for "mass edit"?
chillly (2017-02-09 17:24:55+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
parukhin (2017-02-09 18:10:31+00:00): No, these edits not Automated edits.
Why do you think I use bots or scripts?
I manully edit opening_hours tags or use JOSM quality checks to fix typo, weekdays name in local languages etc. and review my edits before uploading.
See for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463305182/history
SomeoneElse (2017-02-10 01:26:38+00:00): Unfortunately some information has been lost, for example from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465154598/history - that used to say "Opening times dependent on custom" but now someone looking at the shop would think it had fixed opening and closing times.
parukhin (2017-02-10 04:57:54+00:00): Add to description https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465154598
yurasi (2017-02-14 22:49:22+00:00): Hi Ruby Reah Angulo.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added tag oneway =yes to an extensive road. ¿Are you knowledgeable of this area? ¿Are you certain?
mavl (2017-10-12 16:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
mavl (2017-10-12 16:03:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
Zverik (2017-02-07 08:54:46+00:00): Привет!

Проверяем текст сообщения.

Это длинный абзац, чтобы переполнилось поле. Обратите внимание: безопасность работы в программе Apple Mail можно гарантировать только в том случае, если ее версия 3.1 и выше, и если она установлена на компьютере под управлением Mac OS X 10.5.1 и выше. Если версия Apple Mail 3.0 или ниже, или если версия операционной системы Mac OS X 10.5 или ниже, то использовать ее небезопасно. Рекомендуем установить почтовый клиент более новой версии.

Ilya
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
apm-wa (2019-03-16 18:02:00+00:00): Changing this from a node to a way, and tagging as a farmyard instead of "information"
Владимир К (2017-02-07 14:17:40+00:00): К сожалению, дубль. Удаляю.
mavl (2019-01-14 16:41:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
mavl (2017-02-07 16:42:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок, возможно, ошибка, потому что был добавлен тег access=no, который запрещает доступ для всех абсолютно (но некоторым доступ при этом разрешён bicycle=yes, foot=yes).  
  
Например:  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472867026/history  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:Key:access&uselang=ru
pesec (2017-02-08 08:24:35+00:00): Принято. Изменил на permissive.
Странно, что не допускается ограничение по физическим параметрам, что, на мой взгляд, является определяющим.
mavl (2017-02-08 16:08:06+00:00): Ограничения по физическим параметрам есть, например:  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxheight  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight:physical  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxwidth  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:width  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxweight
pesec (2017-02-09 04:25:06+00:00): Спасибо за подсказки.
Zverik (2017-02-07 15:24:58+00:00): Эх, я там машину когда-то чинил.
dac (2017-02-07 18:32:10+00:00): Не то слово... Я там и техосмотр неоднократно проходил... Все течет, все изменяется.
alesarrett (2020-06-14 05:27:55+00:00): Ciao Freiheit28, non capisco l'utilità di questa relazione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6955402
È un errore e si può modificarla in una semplice way che rappresenta l'edificio, oppure ha un qualche significato?
calfarome (2017-02-07 15:45:06+00:00): Sat_Taehyun. May I know the reason why did you delete this "natural=wood in this changeset?. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45877713 , according to the imagery  exist  a natural = wood. The correct edition would have been to improve to the  imagery satellite.
eric_ (2017-02-07 08:53:22+00:00): The name of this place is The Hebrides, not "The Doric". The latter is next door and already mapped.
Alexander-II (2017-02-07 11:50:11+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap. В поле name принято указывать лишь имена собственные, для описания объекта следует использовать тэги. Также обратите внимание, что правильно номер дома выглядел бы как: 2 с10
Я поправлю.

Подробнее можно почитать в вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-11 10:04:48+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45879341
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-11 10:07:22+00:00): Hi Charles Bourree, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-03-06 09:12:36+00:00): Na litość boską... skrót od "numer" to "nr", a nie "nr.". Prawidłowa notacja jest bez kropki.
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 10:30:53+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
eggie (2017-02-07 10:31:24+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Over scholen mappen zijn de meningen verdeeld. Ik kijk even naar deze edit, want de kaart wordt nu wel heel erg donker.
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 10:35:19+00:00): Ik zag dat je op de nieuwe polygon de tag building=school had gezet.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45878628
Dit is niet juist, ik heb het voor je aangepast naar amenity=school
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45881270
Hier kun je lezen wat je nog meer zou kunnen aanvullen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 10:37:07+00:00): Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve.
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
eggie (2017-02-07 10:38:25+00:00): Het moet inderdaad als amenity=college getagd worden. Je was me net voor, want ik kon niet uploaden. 'k Hoop dat kjw dit leest.
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 10:41:03+00:00): pas maar even aan, op dit moment staat het als amenity=school
eggie (2017-02-07 11:13:32+00:00): aangepast
user_3216889 (2017-02-07 14:53:36+00:00): Volgens de NL-wiki voor OSM is college alleen voor hoger onderwijs (geen uni):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:How_to_map_a:S.

Dit is echter middelbaar onderwijs, dus volgens mij is amenity=school juist.
eggie (2017-02-07 15:08:38+00:00): Wellicht heb je gelijk. In de Nederlandse situatie zie ik VO scholen  en ROC's en AOC's altijd als college. Bij school krijg je ook meer zo'n basisschoolsymbool. Forum?
eggie (2017-02-07 16:33:02+00:00): zie forum: school of college? 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=630573#p630573
andygol (2017-02-08 12:09:57+00:00): Hey, 솔지사랑하니! 
I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ?

Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-11 10:08:36+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45878818
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 22:57:42+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:02:23+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57093
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 12:53:10+00:00): Je hebt (per ongeluk) nu dubbel ingebracht.
adres en school
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269644283
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47477315
Ik heb het inmiddels aangepast.
De renderer zal pictogrammen tonen op die gebieden, dus is er geen noodzaak om elk deeltje van het gebied dubbel in de database te zetten.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice#E.C3.A9n_object.2C_.C3.A9.C3.A9n_OSM-element
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-11 10:08:51+00:00): revertes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45878666
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-11 10:07:45+00:00): revertes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45878425
andygol (2017-02-07 09:32:09+00:00): Hey, madjidf!
I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ?
madjidf (2017-02-08 12:53:48+00:00): Hey Andygol,
I really don't know whether the custom imagery meets those requirements or not. The custom imagery has been provided by some other people in the community we have to facilitate our contributions to the OSM map.
andygol (2017-02-08 19:51:02+00:00): madjid, could you raise this issue among other community members?
madjidf (2017-02-10 10:30:54+00:00): I have  raised the issue in our community, but nobody gave a proper answer whether the custom imagery meets those requirements or not. But now what you recommend to solve this problem?
andygol (2017-02-10 11:09:32+00:00): According to http://www.avval.ir/tos you need to ask permission from First Book for using their map for mapping. 

You need to apply to the First Book in order to get permission to use their map for mapping in OSM, and you should refrain from using their map until you get permission from them.

In the meantime, You need to try to make survey on the ground together with the other member of your mapping community and create best map; find other free sources of information.

Best regards,  
andygol
madjidf (2017-02-11 15:36:34+00:00): Hey ,
Many thanks for all your advice.  I will refrain from using First Book map, but in the meantime, I asked First Book to get permission for mapping they told me if requested from OSM directly for permission , they will appraise it.
Here you can find their mailing address. 
Info@avval.ir 

Best regards 
Fadaee
mueschel (2017-02-08 11:39:35+00:00): Hi,
you used the key "Village tract" on many objects - this is not a defined tag in OSM. What is its purpose?

Cheers, Jan
Олег Самуйлов (2017-02-08 12:32:26+00:00): Hi,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Village_tract
Cheers
mueschel (2017-02-08 14:55:47+00:00): Ah, I see.
The key you used doesn't fit well into the usual tagging schemes.
What is used quite often are keys like
is_in:township    or
is_in:ward

I didn't find some established tagging of village tracts right now. So, I would suggest for your purpose:
is_in:tract   or
is_in:villagetract

Note that there is no space in the key.

Cheers, Jan
gileri (2017-02-07 20:32:21+00:00): Bonjour,

Je pense que le tag highway=pedestrian ou highway=footway est plus adapté pour le passage couvert près de l'amphitéatre 3000 et pour le chemin bétonné. Pour la section avec du sable/gravier c'est cependant plus envisageable, mais je pense là aussi que highway=pedestrian/footway serait quand même plus adapté.

highway=path semble plutôt utilisé pour les chemins peu aménagés dans les bois par exemple.
ryra6453 (2017-02-08 06:52:21+00:00): Bonjour
Présence d'un panneau C115 voie verte 
au niveau du pont  W Churchill.
d’après le wiki :  path + motor_vehicle=no
et dans la pratique le passage sous les bâtiment est partagé aussi piétons ,cyclistes .
La plateforme de bus est interdite aux vélos.
gileri (2017-02-10 21:25:59+00:00): Le tag highway=footway+bicycle=yes est tout aussi valable ici.

Pourquoi pas l'utiliser sur la partie bétonnée et highway=path pour la partie sableuse ?
Dans les deux cas les restrictions piétons/vélos/autres véhicules sont exprimables.

J'ai du mal à concevoir que un trottoir en centre-ville soit mappé de la même manière qu'un chemin non aménagé dans les bois.
Bernhard W (2017-12-01 20:25:31+00:00): Bitte keine korrekt eingetragenen Adressen löschen, z. B. beim Eiscafe Venetia in Mannheim-Feudenheim http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3240696674
wegavision (2017-12-01 21:27:20+00:00): Da haben wir verschiedene Auffassungen. Meiner Meinung nach reicht die Adresse des Gebäudes. Auch weil POIs regelmäßig auf ihre Richtigkeit überprüft werden sollten, und es da auf Übersichtlichkeit ankommt. Daher lieber die POIs schlank halten, damit man sofort sieht, ob die Telefonnummer oder die Öffnungszeiten noch stimmen. Aber wie gesagt, das ist nur meine Meinung, man kann gerne die Hausnummer wieder hinzufügen, am besten mit Deutschland, Stadt, Stadtteil, PLZ etc.
Bernhard W (2017-12-01 22:15:13+00:00): Abgesehen davon, dass ich gegen das Löschen von korrekten Daten bin: Im angegebenen Fall hat das Gebäude keine Adresse.
Mike Baggaley (2017-02-08 22:32:16+00:00): Hi, is "Bowring Park entrance" really the name of the road that leads towards Bowring Park car park? It sounds more like a description.

Regards,
Mike
Andrew Heaton (2017-02-09 09:10:58+00:00): You're correct, my mistake. I've removed the 'name' now.
highflyer74 (2017-02-08 09:38:11+00:00): Moin Edding!

Was ist denn DAA? Irgendwie fehlen da entscheidenden Tags...

Gruss aus HB!
highflyer74 (2017-02-24 14:17:17+00:00): Hallo Edding!

Es ist jetzt mehr als zwei Wochen her, daß ich diesen CS kommentiert habe. So bitte so nett, hier auch mal kurz zu antworten, bzw. den von mir angesprochenen Punkt zu bearbeiten. Da Du in der Zwischenzeit weitergemappt hast, gehe ich davon aus, daß Du meine Nachricht gelesen hast...
highflyer74 (2017-02-24 14:22:14+00:00): Noch einmal ich. Es gibt in diesem CS insgesamt drei "DAA" Punkte. Auch fiel mir auf, daß Du bis jetzt noch auf keinen einzigen CS Kommentar anderer Mapper geantwortet hast. Ich möchte Dich darauf hinweisen, daß OSM ein kollaboratives Projekt ist, das nur durch Kommunikation zwischen den Teilnehmern funktioniert. Deshalb wird erwartet, daß man auf Nachrichten, die einen erreichen auch antwortet.
bison166 (2017-12-04 09:09:22+00:00): warum dieser doppelte Eintrag ??
highflyer74 (2017-12-04 09:19:16+00:00): Moin bison, welchen meinst Du denn genau? Der User antwortet leider nicht und einige problematische Änderungen wurden bereits wieder entfernt. Gruss aus HB!
bison166 (2017-12-04 09:26:28+00:00): moin highflyer74,
ich meine das :
Knoten: Thies • Fernseh-Hifi-Sat-Hausgeräte-Service (4670972656)
Ich entferne das jetzt.
Gruß aus VER
highflyer74 (2017-12-04 09:30:03+00:00): Danke Dir!
pnorman (2017-02-26 02:17:47+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-11 10:10:25+00:00): Hi fxschmidt, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
barigela (2019-03-19 17:12:25+00:00): Hi SimonWalduck,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 472931512 classified as 'tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Unclassified'. As of now making necessary changes.
Please suggest if it is otherwise 

Thanks in advance.
dsaneus (2017-02-07 15:36:53+00:00): Someone please revert this changeset
robgeb (2017-02-15 08:26:13+00:00): changset reverted
Dinamik (2017-04-14 20:51:40+00:00): Здравствуйте! Пожалуйста, не удаляйте статусные части из названий объектов водной среды. "Формальный" тип объекта не определяет его название (например, водоём может называться озером, прудом, морем, болотом, ериком и т. д. вне зависимости от типа происхождения).
Зелёный Кошак (2017-04-14 22:11:39+00:00): ПНХ, дюнямик.
Dinamik (2017-04-17 05:08:46+00:00): Здравствуйте! Прошу Вас дать пояснения по существу вопросу. 

P. S. Если необходимо передать название моего ника русскими буквами, используется, пожалуйста, сочетание "Динамик".
srividya_c (2017-02-08 05:44:40+00:00): Hi T mohan,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I think you have deleted a wood cover in this changeset where its clearly visible in Satellite imagery. Is there any reason behind deleting this?

Happy to help.

srividya_c
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-11 10:11:16+00:00): Hi JOSEMAR LEANDRO DA SILVA, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?