piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Carto'Cité (2018-10-30 13:46:18+00:00): Bonjour Drallibor,

Tu es sûr que ce tronçon (pas raccordé à une de ses extrémités) n'est vraiment plus une piste cyclable et que le vélo n'est que "permissive" alors qu'on est sur un itinéraire cyclable ? Je me permet la question parce que les photos Mapillary 360 ici sont relativement récente et montrent encore une piste cyclable. Merci d'avance si tu as le temps de me répondre.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Drallibor (2018-10-30 14:34:16+00:00): Bonjour,

oui actuellement la piste est encore matérialisée, mais la mairie de Chelles est en train de le transformer en stationnement automobile pour l'école des Tournelles.
J'avais positionné le tag "bicycle" à "permissive", parce que le passage des vélos est "toléré"
Par contre je ne vois pas de relation avec un itinéraire cyclable dans le secteur alentour.
Damien d'Opti'vélO
Glassman (2018-10-17 23:10:23+00:00): You called it a park but didn't add the park tag, leisure=park. Do you need help?
KyleStorck (2018-10-18 19:03:14+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. It is called "South Norway Hill Park" but it is not like a traditional park with open space and facilities. It is a traditional wooded space with a couple unofficial trails. How do you recommend I modify it?
Glassman (2018-10-18 22:06:55+00:00): If you open it up in the editor, Select the wood area outline, then on the lower left hand side where you see the name = South Norway Hill Park, below that is tags, Just add a new tag leisure=park. Now the polygon will be both a park and a wooded area. 

Thanks for getting back to me.
eggie (2018-10-17 21:42:08+00:00): Dag raymond.. Is dit niet gewoon een brandgang. Een highway=service is meer voor vierwielvoertuigen als auto's.
Je kunt het taggen als highway=path
en om te voorkomen dat je via brandgangen wordt gestuurd in routeplanners zet je het op access=private.
Is dit wellicht een brandgang?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-18 07:16:49+00:00): omgezet in highway=path, access private
angys (2019-05-25 12:54:58+00:00): Can you retrace the raod by using Esri Imagery?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-20 21:07:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77344099 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets which contain objects from an incompatible source.  Attempt to contact the mapper failed; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63486159
clay_c (2018-10-23 19:37:17+00:00): Hi rhoover! The tags you're adding are all helpful, though it seems that some of the building outlines you've edited have lost their `building=yes` tag. Could you go back and make sure they're all marked as buildings, and also that their names are properly capitalized?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63623354
Leo Slager (2018-10-17 23:38:30+00:00): Dubbele lijnen en tags verwijderd.
Bedrijfs-gegevens niet op het gebouw taggen maar op de adresnode van het kadaster.
Ik heb eea gecorrigeerd
kartonage (2018-10-18 03:29:25+00:00): Es steht im Prinzip schon im Namen, dass es sich hierbei nicht um eine Werkstatt handelt. Den Import bitte einstellen und bitte wegen den mangelhaften Daten melden bzw. die unbedingt nötigen Fragen bezüglich dieses Imports beantworten. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Import/Guidelines)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-20 21:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77344099 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets which contain objects from an incompatible source.  Attempt to contact the mapper failed; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63486159
mavl (2018-12-25 00:14:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
SHARCRASH (2018-12-16 09:44:11+00:00): Why did you put this as "smoothness=impassable"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566105212/history
perquise (2018-12-30 14:46:09+00:00): Because I went there on my bike and I could not pass (starting about 100m from the southeast corner).
SHARCRASH (2018-12-30 15:23:15+00:00): Ok thank you for the response. But be aware that "impassable" value means that the highway is impassable for all kinds of vehicle... not only for one means of mobility. Each value of the smoothness limits more and more some vehicles.
oba510 (2018-10-18 06:22:04+00:00): This change doesn't seem quite correct. The intersection is so wide that vehicles turning right from Posen onto Ordway never actually enter the roundabout - the ways were connected at the same node intentionally to reflect that fact. The sidewalk tags also got (very slightly) messed up here.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-20 21:07:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77344099 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets which contain objects from an incompatible source.  Attempt to contact the mapper failed; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63486159
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-18 05:41:41+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas, nes buvo ištrinti geri objektai (pvz. takai sodyboje) ir neteisingai perklasifikuoti keliai bei danga.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
chnav (2018-10-18 09:46:08+00:00): Объясните причину удаления парковых дорожек. Они отчетливо видны на всех спутниковых подложках, включая Sentinel-2 от конца сентября. Пожалуйста прекратите удалять валидные данные.
Правка откачена.
Филиппок (2018-10-18 16:32:17+00:00): Я не знал как назвать ,не буду же как то каждую лужайку называть , это только на кладбище участки обозначены.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Glassman (2018-10-17 22:34:50+00:00): Check out the wiki page on climbing for help adding climbing information into OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Climbing. I bet if you get on the talk mailing list, you'll find others interested in this sport. I'll send you more info on OSM as well as a how we communicate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63624797
yaugenka (2019-01-12 23:01:14+00:00): Привет! Позволь спросить, что это?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635433862
ChehVlad (2019-01-14 06:55:09+00:00): биологический заказник местного значения
yaugenka (2019-01-16 12:58:03+00:00): спасибо! дополнил.
Yury Yatsynovich (2019-01-17 13:53:35+00:00): Откуда у вас сведения о нём? В списке заказников от Минприроды (www.minpriroda.gov.by/uploads/files/Zakazniki.docx) он не значится
ChehVlad (2019-01-17 14:39:22+00:00): Кадастровая карта 
СОАТО 7258903003
Yury Yatsynovich (2019-01-17 17:33:44+00:00): Поставлю под сомнение актуальность данных на указанной странице кадастровой карты: статусы заказников на ней (районного и областного значения) не соответствуют действующим статусам (республиканского и местного значения, согласно Закона о ООПТ от 2018 г.), а также отсутствуют сведения о некоторых действующих заказниках (пример,"Соколиный"),которые содержатся в выше указанном файле Минприроды
Yury Yatsynovich (2019-01-17 17:36:39+00:00): (имелась в виду эта страница http://nca.by/rus/geosystem/partition/preserves.txt)
Glassman (2018-10-17 23:08:48+00:00): Tip - you can square building by selecting the outline then type an "s"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63624868
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-20 21:08:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77344099 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets which contain objects from an incompatible source.  Attempt to contact the mapper failed; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63486159
Glassman (2018-10-17 22:47:02+00:00): Can you add a tag to classify Worx's business? Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63624973
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
Glassman (2018-10-17 22:36:11+00:00): This also needs a tag amenity=cafe. Can you add it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63625093
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-20 21:07:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77344099 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets which contain objects from an incompatible source.  Attempt to contact the mapper failed; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63486159
glglgl (2019-01-14 16:26:52+00:00): Hier ist dir glaube ich was mit dem schwarzen Punkt passiert; ab diesem Änderungssatz waren alle Elemente doppelt in der Relation. Ich habe sie soeben mal glattgezogen (soweit möglich in einer Reihe, Duplikate raus, sofern es keine Stichwege sind).
Lokai (2019-01-15 14:16:14+00:00): Ich kann das nicht nachvollziehen. Wo genau? Bitte PN
Glassman (2018-10-17 22:25:01+00:00): I went ahead and deleted the park you added. This isn't really a park, even though it may be called a skateboard park.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63625210
GerdP (2018-10-18 08:11:35+00:00): Moin! Schau bitte noch mal auf den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635440976 
Ist mir wegen highway=p aufgefallen,sollte wohl eigentlich ein geschlossener Weg mit highway=pedestrian sein?
Matthias Frank (2018-10-20 19:47:05+00:00): Hallo Gerd,
Highway=p war natürlich ein Fehler von mir. Habe es wieder auf pedestrian korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis, Grüße von Matthias
Casey_boy (2018-10-22 10:47:11+00:00): Thanks for reverting this (now the bridge is open again). I hadn't been able to get round to it.
John-O (2018-10-23 16:47:17+00:00): No problem. Some other user(s) had partially reverted it and I thought I should do the rest
iandees (2018-10-17 21:24:14+00:00): Thanks for adding to OSM! Did you mean to move the "ARCpoint Labs of Golden Valley" instead of creating a new point? Does ARCpoint not exist anymore?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63625274
Glassman (2018-10-17 22:39:43+00:00): The building was connected to the high voltage power line. I disconnected them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63625278
abakus_uploader (2018-10-17 22:30:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
LLlypuk82 (2018-10-20 22:39:19+00:00): Приветствую. Вы уверены, что все отмечаемые дороги у вас по трекам gpx? У меня есть подозрение, что вы что-то путаете (например, со спутниковыми снимками)
А поэтому прошу аккуратнее относиться к полевым/лесным дорогам, где один раз (а то и один) несколько лет назад проехал трактор. Если не были сами на местности и не видели этих дорог, то лучше воздержаться от их внесения.
LLlypuk82 (2018-10-20 22:41:21+00:00): один-два раза проехал трактор — мифическая дорога, исчезающая уже в этот или следующий сезон, а у вас тут целая сеть дорог получилась: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/55.2638/30.4504
LLlypuk82 (2018-10-20 22:46:07+00:00): я там был лично совсем недавно и поэтому обратил внимание на несуразную сеть, возникшую из ниоткуда

а ведь у вас на каждой правке якобы все по gpx-трекам дороги, прошу более обдуманно отнестись.
kindose (2018-10-21 07:39:20+00:00): Добрый день, да несколько дорог было нанесено со спутниковых снимков, я их почищу и впредь буду только на свои треки gpx ориентироваться
Glassman (2018-10-17 22:29:59+00:00): To tag a building or road under construction use the from object=construction so in this case it would be building=construction. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Construction for more info. 
We also don't use descriptive names. So name="under Construction" should be remove. Can you fix these?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63625399
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-20 21:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77344099 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets which contain objects from an incompatible source.  Attempt to contact the mapper failed; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63486159
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
Glassman (2018-10-17 22:31:17+00:00): Should this be a highway=service   service=alley?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63625612
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76239545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible edits following a report to the DWG.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66845301 (no reply from mapper).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-11-20 21:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77344099 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets which contain objects from an incompatible source.  Attempt to contact the mapper failed; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63486159
flohoff (2018-10-18 16:44:36+00:00): Hi c-we
ich habe auf dem Territory parkplatz den name in den Operator verschoben. name ist wirklich für Eigennamen und der Parkplatz heisst ja nicht so sondern ist der Kunden?Mitarbeiter? Parkplatz der Territory-CTR. Das access=private kann man dementsprechend auch noch verfeinern ggfs auf customer.

Flo
Cyclono (2018-10-25 19:17:47+00:00): Hi Pptje, 

Deze maashavenplein, is het een heel gebied of een route?
eggie (2018-10-25 19:46:31+00:00): Wanneer dit een voetgangersgebied is ontbreekt area = yes.. Nu lijkt het of er een pad omheen loopt. De stukjes groen en de fietsenstalling kunnen als inner in een multipolygoon worden opgenomen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Cyclono (2018-10-25 20:25:54+00:00): Ik heb de area=yes gedaan en de relaties inner en outer goed gezet. Het zal nu moeten kloppen
mariotomo (2019-09-05 18:06:18+00:00): Hola, es uno de tus primeras contribuciones a OSM, cierto?  no deberíamos poner información personal en la base de datos.
viloan (2018-10-17 21:45:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GinaroZ (2018-10-17 22:12:27+00:00): Thanks for adding the cycle path, saw construction photos on fb. I've marked it as lcn=yes to complete the route to Kilrenny. Did you notice if there was a path alongside the road here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/908836830
mountainmonkey (2018-10-25 11:10:53+00:00): No sorry, I didn't have time to go down Windmill Road.
mariotomo (2019-09-05 18:06:09+00:00): Hola, es uno de tus primeras contribuciones a OSM, cierto?  no deberíamos poner información personal en la base de datos.
mariotomo (2019-09-05 18:06:01+00:00): Hola, es uno de tus primeras contribuciones a OSM, cierto?  no deberíamos poner información personal en la base de datos.
kartonage (2018-10-18 03:46:38+00:00): Die Domain ist nicht mehr aktiv und auch sonst sieht es eher nach Insolvenz aus, scheint als würde es Magross nicht mehr geben. Und wenn, dann war es sicher nie eine KFZ-Werkstatt.
literan (2018-10-18 15:35:05+00:00): why did you deleted multypolygones of building parts? It's vandalism. Reverted. Please do not delete features that you do not understand
enotramone (2018-10-18 16:36:28+00:00): Please, can you explain the problem? What was the problem? Where I can read about «multypolygones of building parts»?
literan (2018-10-18 19:58:12+00:00): problem is: there were 3d-mapped buildings with parts of different heights. and you deleted this. wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon  Building parts, like other objects, may be mapped with polygones, and with multipolygones. Here you can find examples of building mapping (in Russian, but the images are good): https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/6804/51351719.14/0_a4c49_b0c6d619_orig
enotramone (2018-10-19 09:15:11+00:00): OK, now it's clearly understandable, I didn't know, thanks for explain!
kartonage (2018-10-18 03:36:09+00:00): Im Mercedes-Benz-Werk werden Autos hergestellt. Es ist ziemlich unwahrscheinlich, dass es diese Werkstatt in dieser Art hier gibt. Und wenn bin ich mir ziemlich sicher, dass das Tagging entsprechend angepasst werden sollte, da es sich um ein privates Gelände handelt.
DD1GJ (2018-10-18 08:14:01+00:00): Glasnost bedeutet Offenheit und Transparenz, was wir aber bei Deinen Edits bisher vermissen. Welche Datenquelle(n) verwendest Du? Warum trägst Du Autowerkstätten ein, die Du anscheinend überhaupt nicht kennst?

Beantworte diese Fragen hier bitte bis morgen Abend, ansonsten werden alle Deine Eintragungen wegen unklarer Datenherkunft und mangelnder Qualität gelöscht. Falls Du diese Nachrichten ignorierst und weitermachst, wird dein Account vorläufig gesperrt.
mariotomo (2021-09-06 17:09:12+00:00): hola Laura Patricia. te animas a volver a mapear para OpenStreetMap? tener personas en el lugar es indispensable para todas características que no se aprecian de las fotos aéreas. cordialmente, MF.
abakus_uploader (2018-10-18 22:30:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2018-10-18 22:30:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2018-10-18 22:30:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Glassman (2018-10-17 23:32:23+00:00): The housenumber should be a separate tag from the street. For example addr:housenumber=123   addr:street=West Main Street. Can you fix this as well as the others?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63627474