piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_3022894 (2025-03-16 16:28:06+00:00): Hallo Anna Catarina,
danke für deine Nachricht.
Das weiß ich ehrlich gesagt nicht, weshalb dort diese Darstellungsweise gewählt worden ist. Ich kann dir nur sagen, wenn du dir die vollständige History der beiden Ways anschaust, dann siehst du, dass nicht ich Ersteller der Ways bin, sondern es war Mentz. Und falls du die noch nicht kennen solltest, kann ich dir dazu sagen, die machen so einige komische Dinge für ihre Fahrplanauskunft usw. und so fort.

Meiner Erfahrung nach bringt es nicht viel, mit denen zu diskutieren, teilweise wissen die selber nicht, was sie tun. Zumal das schon 10 ahre ehr ist. Von mir aus kannst du gerne wieder einen Way d'raus machen.
LG
Gazer75 (2016-12-23 13:10:35+00:00): Please don't alter roads that have already been improved with data from Kartverket and/or NVDB. Unless you use an industrial grade GPS, or the road have changed significantly, data from Kartverket will always be better quality.
Alan Bragg (2017-04-30 20:12:36+00:00): This building has no width. Seems to be a shop but I cannot define it with the imagery.
Nice mapping in this area.
keithonearth (2016-11-11 04:05:22+00:00): Hi wentworth4, thanks for your edits. From what I've seen they are good. 

Also, I was wondering if you'd be willing to leave more meaningful edit summaries. For example "adding address". Or "retagging bus_stop as bus_station" which is, as best as I can figure, what this edit did. 

I think it'd be helpful if you used more informative edit summaries.
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 21:35:55+00:00): #UNC_Colorado  #GEOG100
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 21:39:57+00:00): #UNC_Colorado  #GEOG100
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 21:53:08+00:00): #UNC_Colorado  #GEOG100
mueschel (2016-10-23 11:52:51+00:00): Moin,
ich habe gerade dieses Tagging an vielen Nodes gefunden: 
frequency:mo-fr06-20=2
frequency:mo-fr20-01=0
frequency:sa20-01=0
frequency:su20-01=0
Diese Tags sind neu.
Was hälst du stattdessen von einem Tagging mittels
service_times für die Zeiten an denen die Haltestelle bedient wird
interval:conditional für die Angabe von verschiedenen Intervallen (wird ohne conditional schon 500 Mal benutzt)
Solche Informationen würde ich aber auch eher an die Buslinien-Relation taggen und nicht an die Haltestelle.

Btw: Bist du dir sicher, dass die Quelle unter einer passenden Lizenz steht?

Gruß, Jan
q_un_go (2016-10-23 12:53:21+00:00): Hallo,

was die Tagging-Vorschläage angeht: OK. Kann ich ändern.
Auf die Relation würde ich es nicht setzen wollen, weil die Linienrelationen im RVF zu stark aggregiert sind, als dass es darüber darstellbar wäre. Beim Taggen der Haltestelle bekommt man dagegen eher einen Überblick, wenn auch nur sehr grob, wie oft da etwas vorbeifährt. no,
irregular, school, 120, 60, 30 und 15+ schweben mir da als Kategorien vor. Das lässt keine großen Rückschlüsse auf den Fahrplan dahinter zu, aber gute auf die ÖPNV-Anbindung. 

Das mit der Lizenz kläre ich noch.
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 21:55:24+00:00): #UNC_Colorado  #GEOG100
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 21:58:17+00:00): #UNC_Colorado  #GEOG100
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 22:28:05+00:00): #UNC_Colorado and #GEOG100
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 22:27:41+00:00): #UNC_Colorado and #GEOG100
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 21:57:26+00:00): #UNC_Colorado  #GEOG100
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 22:00:11+00:00): #UNC_Colorado  #GEOG100
demon_box (2018-02-01 12:32:57+00:00): Ristorante "Al Lago" letteralmente in mezzo alla strada...?? Curioso ;-)
L'ho rimosso.
ciao
pacman541 (2016-10-27 08:49:06+00:00): лучше сделать вот так:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:place%3Dlocality
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 22:27:11+00:00): #UNC_Colorado and #GEOG100
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 22:44:10+00:00): #UNC_Colorado and #GEOG100
Alexandra44 (2016-10-22 22:47:12+00:00): #UNC_Colorado and #GEOG100
Warin61 (2018-11-21 00:17:12+00:00): Hi,
This is the 'Story Trail' .. a small section of the 'Bundian Way'.
I have renamed it. 
And made a route relation for the Bundian Way ... it uses the existing roads .. hopefully some one wil walk the path (off the roads) and update OSM with a gps track.
See https://www.edenmagnet.com.au/story/3817139/edens-bundian-way-story-trail-on-track/

And also https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=9027903&map=10!-36.8002!149.0683
Warin61 (2017-12-27 21:30:06+00:00): Hi,
I think Macpherson Street may now be open?
SK53 (2016-10-23 14:35:28+00:00): You have removed all tags from this way when as your note says it is only partially closed to motor traffic. You should have merely added motor_vehicle=no to the way. Here's the notce http://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/extra/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=64595&p=0
SK53 (2016-10-23 15:50:11+00:00): I'm reverting this edit as it is clearly an incorrect representation of the Gloucs Highway document and worsens information for everyone except drivers turning off the A-road
literan (2016-10-23 13:14:02+00:00): Не надо вандалить на карте. Ваши правки же все видят
Михаил Лебедев (2016-10-24 02:19:25+00:00): Что то не понял в чем предъява ?
literan (2016-10-24 09:32:17+00:00): в том, что вы название кафе, видимое пользователям, заменяете на "Надо посетить". Все еще непонятно?
user_5359 (2016-10-23 15:30:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Drental , too!
user_514683 (2016-10-24 15:25:48+00:00): 你好。欢迎光临OSM。请问这条线是什么？在OSM都应该有tags。就是告诉我们是什么东西的信息。所以请告诉我是什么为了我加tags或者你也可以自己加tags或者应该删掉。谢谢。

Hi. Welcome to OSM. Could you tell me what this line is? In OSM every object should have tags to let us know what the data represents. Please let me know what it is so that I can add the tags, or you could add the tags yourself, or it will have to be deleted. Thanks.
user_514683 (2016-10-23 08:09:46+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the additions. Just a small remark regarding "快客 Quik"; names are almost always only in Chinese. If there is an English name too, this should be added as the English name but the name tag shouldn't be English and Chinese mixed together. I'll split it up for you.
Happy mapping.
highflyer74 (2016-10-27 06:10:04+00:00): Moin Jörg und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist.

Hier ist ein bisschen was durcheinander gelaufen... Da liegen jetzt zwei Straßen fast übereinander. Kannst Du da bitte noch einmal drübergucken?

In Ermangelung von Satellitenbildern wäre es auch gut, wenn die Lage der Straße durch mehrfaches Abfahren + Tracken per GPS verifiziert werden könnte. Jetzt ist die Lage vermutlich nur geschätzt, oder?

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
muralito (2016-10-23 14:22:09+00:00): Ivan:

Los elementos no llevan nombres descriptivos. El estacionamiento se etiqueta perfectamente con amenity=parking, y si efectivamente tiene un nombre, se le agrega. Si no, no hace falta y no se recomienda.
muralito (2016-10-23 15:05:50+00:00): El acceso "solo a camiones" se describe con 3 etiquetas
access=no (nadie tiene acceso)
goods=yes (si acceso a camiones livianos)
hgv=yes (si acceso a camiones pesados)

Las mismas 3 etiquetas pueden usarse para estacionamientos, calles, etc.
GerdP (2017-08-29 06:31:38+00:00): Hi!
You have mapped a few highway=private here. This is not widely used. I assume you meant highway=service + service=driveway?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rjG
Zverik (2016-10-24 13:19:36+00:00): Hi, you have deleted parts of the coastline with this and maybe other edits. Please be careful next time.
user_514683 (2016-10-23 08:05:43+00:00): Does this supermarket definitely not exist?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_514683 (2016-10-23 08:03:46+00:00): Oh yeah, forgot to fix this myself. Thanks.
mavl (2018-11-01 17:03:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
Supaplex (2016-10-23 17:39:16+00:00): 有名稱嗎?
lcoreyl (2016-11-18 23:25:51+00:00): Wan-Hsiung Bar
Osm1980 (2016-12-16 09:39:57+00:00): bashgah badan sazi tagesh eshtebahe benazaram
richlv (2016-10-23 12:59:34+00:00): the shops you added here looked very suspect and i removed them.
if there indeed are shops at those locations, please re-add them and specify the names, too :)
mavl (2018-11-01 17:02:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
zors1843 (2016-10-23 06:38:35+00:00): Part of Dieweg is oneway.  Is that right ?
arnaudpn (2016-10-23 06:39:59+00:00): No that's not right. The Dieweg is two ways from the start here @Ringlaan down to the train station.
zors1843 (2016-10-23 06:42:40+00:00): Thanks
Müszi (2016-11-27 11:43:40+00:00): Szia!

A nyereg (Kereszt-nyereg, bár sose hallottam ezt a nevet) szinte 300 méterrel arrébb van, áthelyeztem.

A Golgota-sziklákat is mindig Krokodil-sziklák néven hallottam emlegetni (a formája miatt, csak mostanra benőtte a bozót, nem látszik). Honnan származik az általad beírt név?

Tudtommal a Golgota-rét is arrébb van (N46.66203 E22.63726 körül), arról mit tudsz? Amit te berajzoltál, az inkább egy meredek sziklafal.

A Boga-kerítés pont szerintem fölösleges, látom, hogy a sziklafal objektumba is beírtad a nevet.

A Nagy Phaeton-körút nevet töröltem az ösvényről, az OSM wiki szerint csak akkor szabad nevet beírni egy útnak, ha az hivatalos formában megjelenik (pl. utcanévtábla).

-- 
Szia: Zsolt
Gardster (2016-10-25 12:24:32+00:00): Hi! Why do you remove this points?
Tomas Straupis (2016-10-25 12:43:33+00:00): Strange edits using bad editor - maps.me
Provide more info when adding objects and they will have a higher chance to stay.
Gardster (2016-10-25 13:40:16+00:00): Remove changes, based on editor type is not good practice to maintain community around open maps. You can at least write to the author and ask to fix tags you don't like or to add information you want to see.
Tomas Straupis (2016-10-25 13:46:09+00:00): And this is what we did and do. Unfortunately more than 50% of maps.me edits are total rubish, remaining 40% are problematic and only 10% are more or less ok. And almost nobody from maps.me users bothers answering, so we finally stopped even trying to contact maps.me users.
Tomas Straupis (2016-10-25 13:47:15+00:00): And our resources are limited, so this is what we must do to keep up with our QA process.
Gardster (2016-10-25 14:14:08+00:00): Do you represent some company to talk about any "yours" QA process? 
By the way: no one maps.me user breaks coastlines or multipolygons. JOSM users are break them often. And this is not a reason to remove all JOSM edits.
Tomas Straupis (2016-10-25 18:19:35+00:00): We have a QA process in Lithuania for Lithuanian OSM community. We have a specific coftware written for that etc. We are doing it in organised way for more than 5 years now.
It is very fortunate, that mapsme does not have more possibilities to edit, as it would have been an even larger disaster than it currently is.
trigpoint (2016-10-24 16:45:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4460064889 looks very odd, it is named as a Rugby Club, but tagged as a post office. What is it?
catdreamer (2017-10-20 12:49:37+00:00): 請問柯子林茶莊後面是指游泳池嗎?(照英文說明是這樣)
BodyAny (2017-10-22 11:50:10+00:00): 是的，有一個天然的河可以游泳，也有更衣空間。
catdreamer (2017-10-24 08:33:33+00:00): 不妨改成
「柯子林野溪戲水池」或是「柯子林野溪游泳池」之類的名稱
Red Kobold (2016-10-23 08:14:44+00:00): North of the burn is still part of Ceres. The correct tag for Bridgend is place=neighborhood. Could also have Gladney and New Town.
wambacher (2016-10-23 08:30:51+00:00): Hi Dewi, i know about the long discussion for that import. You state the permission has be sent to you (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue#One-Time_Imports), but we can't find a copy or link on the project wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_Infrastructure_Features_in_Surabaya) on in contributors (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors)

Please stop this unless you give us access to the permission.

regards
walter
user_5359 (2016-10-23 15:24:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I don’t think this is a artwork. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Supaplex (2016-10-23 17:32:29+00:00): 這家有店名嗎?
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2016-10-24 13:31:24+00:00): Hallo gserb,
warum hast du in der Relation 6640378 type=superroute in rype=route_master geändert?
Superroute sollte nach meinerm Verständnis des Wikis genau das richtige sein - siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:superroute.
Viele Grüße
gsperb (2016-10-24 14:05:49+00:00): Hi
Ich habe die nicht geändert sondern angelegt. So angelegt wie ich bisher alle anlegte und wie auch alle mir bekannten angelegt waren.
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2016-10-24 16:38:13+00:00): Hm... also ich kenne bisher nur Beispiele bei denen für die Überrelationen type=supperroute oder type=route haben, aber eben nicht type=route_master (das ist eher für punlic_transport- oder Fahrrad-Relationen). Bei Autobahnen wird offenbar letzteres verwendet: hier ein Beispiel: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20738
Auch im entsprechenden Wiki-Eintrag zu deinem verwendeten Tag-Wert (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route_master) finde ich keinen Hinweis darauf, dass man ihn so verwenden sollte.
gsperb (2016-10-24 21:09:17+00:00): Den Eintrag habe ich auch gelesen. Sogar das das es route_master eigentlich offiziell nicht gibt bzw. es keine anerkannte Relation ist.
Weshalb aber funktioniert es dann und hat sogar ein eigenes Icon?
Doch a) wo ist der Unterschied zu public_transport und b) wenn, dann müssten wir alle auf superroute umstellen.
Nenn' einen Vorteil und ich bin dabei. 
Nur weil es irgendwo steht ist keine absolute Begründung zumal zu anderen Themen (grad' bei public_transport) in unterschiedlichen Abschnitten ziemlich Gegensätzliches steht. Je nachdem wo man gerade liest.
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2016-10-25 19:06:09+00:00): route_master ist für den öffentlichen Verkehr und Bundesstraßen werden jedoch hauptsächlich von Individualverkehr (also nichtöffentlichen Verkehr) genutzt. Also wäre der Vorteil, dass es einfach nicht mehr falsch wäre ;-) Und ich bekomme bei meinen Auswertungen mit putr deshalb nicht mehr ständig Fehlermeldungen.

Wie gesagt, finde ich sonst auf Anhieb auch keine Bundesstraßen oder Autobahnen die so getagt sind wie du es gemacht hast.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Germany/Bundesstra%C3%9Fen
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2016-10-25 19:11:34+00:00): Das eigene Icon ist eben für route_master-Relationen von z.B. Bus-, Straßenbahn- oder Zuglinien.

Es ist leider manches tatsächlich widersprüchlich im Wiki, aber wofür type=route_master da ist, ist klar genug auf der Seite definiert (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route_master).
BCNorwich (2016-10-24 09:24:17+00:00): Hello, can you state the purpose of this "blook line"? What is it, what is it for, is it verifiable? You have added it to the OMS live database and I can see no reason for it. Thanks.
BCNorwich (2016-10-24 09:32:32+00:00): Hello this "line i9n bow" that you have added to the OSM database does not contain enough information to be of any use. Unless you can expand on it, or explain it then it should be removed.
Apirnus (2023-05-01 09:21:16+00:00): Saw fix me tag on it when this change was added. No, it is not disused at all. Kaitseliit is using it, Kaitsevägi is using it for training all year round. This area maybe could be changed to military usage but it is definetly not abandoned or disused.
Jan Olieslagers (2023-05-01 09:50:11+00:00): Thanks! But are they using _for_aviation_ ?  checked, and could not even find it any longer in the AIP nor in the VFR guide, so it would seem that _as_an_aerodrome_ it is more disused than ever.
Apirnus (2023-05-01 10:12:41+00:00): No, it is not used for aviation per se altho I know at least one trial of landing on it in modern times few years ago which ended not so well for the plane... Anyway, its used more for ground troops training rather than for aviation. Whole area is used not for the purpose of aviation but for other things.
Speed limit on the roads is 50km/h per Kaitseliit Lääne Malevkond web page and whole area is restricted so that for use you need to ask permission from Kaitseliit. Of course none of the civil people ask it and just go hang out around there.
Jan Olieslagers (2023-05-01 10:47:32+00:00): Thanks again, I already updated the entry. Observe that I also replaced "military=yes" by the standard "landuse=military", that will have its effect upon rendering.
Would you have more details about the trial of landing that ended "not so well"?
Kindly,
KA
Apirnus (2023-05-01 11:06:40+00:00): Yes, searched for it a little. Its estonian language but references I think could be found even more so. 
Landing happened on the year 2015. A10 planes landed and there were some damages to at least one plane because the landing track is in severely bad condition besides all the debris on the track. You wont find any info on what really went wrong but at that time I was serving and it happened to be where these planes situated so the story reached even to us mere military mortals that during landing one of the plane wheelbase got little damage from all those bumps and debris on the landing track. Of course media will say everything went good and fine but it didnt went exactly 100% perfectly and it was expected knowing the severe condition of the landing track.

https://www.err.ee/550483/usa-rundelennukid-maandusid-kiltsi-lennuvaljal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT24t1_Q9Gk

Hopefully the landing track will be somewhat updated or maybe it already was because during year 2017 there were plans on fixing at least some of the landing track for small planes. Full length of the track is 2,5km. Planned fix was about something of 800m. Havent been there for a long while, dont know much more besides few years back of the stuff.
joost schouppe (2017-03-31 18:17:04+00:00): Dit stukje (way 449045836) lijkt mij geen tertiary, maar gewoon residential. De naam ontbreekt ook. Of is het een speciale situatie?
Van Heddegem Roeland (2017-04-01 06:33:49+00:00): Hoi Joost, ik kan het mij niet zo goed herinneren. Ik heb daar gelopen, daar ben ik zeker van...
Van Heddegem Roeland (2017-04-01 06:38:20+00:00): Ik weet het terug. Toen ik daar passeerde was het een opgewaardeerde​ veldweg. Dat leek me wat overdreven voor residential.
wambacher (2016-10-23 09:29:03+00:00): Hi Dewi, did you read my comments?
wambacher (2016-10-23 09:41:38+00:00): Hi Dewi, you MUST respect the import guidelines. beside the missing permission you have to use an extra account like Import_surabaya and use proper chaneset comments.
It is quite shure that all your work will be reverted.
BeKri (2016-10-23 17:45:39+00:00): BOA Dauen hoch !
Man kann mit Ärtzme tatsächlich was vernünftiges beitragen !
Scheint also doch zu gehen, wenn man es richtig macht, Danke !
L'imaginaire (2016-10-25 20:59:53+00:00): Dag Martin, welkom bij OpenStreetMap en bedankt om de kaart te verbeteren! Een kleine opmerking om je wat verder op weg te helpen: je hebt café Den Buro twee keer op de kaart gezet, één keer als café en één keer als bar (zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbar#Similar_tags voor het verschil). Ik heb een beetje opgekuist, zodat er geen dubbele vermelding meer is. Ik heb de naam ook veranderd naar Den Buroo, dat is de naam die ik op het web terugvind. Als je zelf nog vragen hebt, dan vind je zeker meer info via een van de kanalen vermeld op deze site: http://osm.be/nl/community
trigpoint (2016-10-24 16:47:03+00:00): Please only add a website if the place has its own. Links to booking sites should not be added, I have removed this link.
Commodoortje (2016-10-24 03:02:39+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Je hebt 2x highway=rest_area aangebracht op OSM. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area
Dit zijn rustplaatsen langs autosnelwegen.
Bedoel je misschien dat er picknick tafels staan?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
gileri (2016-10-24 20:47:03+00:00): Hello, are you sure this building only has one level ? Usually those have 2+.

Also, the tag building:levels=* should go on the building outiline, not the adress note.
gileri (2020-03-22 09:39:18+00:00): Fixed : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82478060
dieterdreist (2016-10-24 08:27:35+00:00): please stop adding fictious places and features into OpenStreetMap. You are vandalizing the database.
user_6110846 (2017-11-13 21:29:03+00:00): Настоятельно просим воздержаться от безобразия подобного с рекой
user_6110846 (2017-11-13 21:31:45+00:00): Большая Каменка . Река делит на Украину и Россия. Заменят украинский на русский ето устраивать войну редагирований . Здесь надо бьіло перетегировать на английский  ( международній формат или двух язычие ) Этим продемонстрировано чт о в 2016 был украинофобский подход
user_6110846 (2017-11-13 21:32:13+00:00): Как хорошо что в 2017 году его уже нет .
rene78 (2016-10-23 14:15:38+00:00): Camp sites? Are you sure?
zstadler (2016-12-21 09:32:18+00:00): Hi Eric,

This change introduced an error in the Area B multipolygon:
.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=35.20144&lat=32.41343&zoom=16&overlays=touching_rings,ways
.
As a result of this, Area B is longer shown on the Israel Hiking and Biking maps.
.
It looks like this is not the first time such a change is applied. The previous was in 2014:
.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=25905849&zoom=16&lat=32.41334&lon=35.20228&layers=B0TTTFT#map=16
.
Can you elaborate on the reasons for this change so we can discuss ways to implement your goals while avoiding multipolygon errors.
.
Thanks,
Zeev
eric22 (2016-12-21 10:07:21+00:00): I made this change in an effort to reduce or eliminate the shapes with "errors" on OSM Inspector, to make it easier to spot genuine information errors. Now that I know that this particular change is a problem for the Israel Hiking map, I won't touch it again.
zstadler (2016-12-21 13:21:15+00:00): Thanks!

It seems like OSM inspector still complained about "touching rings" after your edit. Maybe it would complain no matter what we do with this X-shaped geometry...
eric22 (2016-12-21 13:59:22+00:00): Yes, that is my conclusion too.
zstadler (2016-12-21 17:53:37+00:00): By the way, OSM Inspector says that "touching rings" is not necessarily an error...
karsbehr (2020-06-17 17:21:49+00:00): Hi Chrishase, müsste man die Knoten, die mit entrance=yes gemappt sind, nicht mit door=yes taggen? Siehe "Simple Indoor Tagging" im Wiki. LG Karsten
km2bp (2016-10-24 16:24:11+00:00): Droga wewnętrzna która utworzyłeś Ta z zakazem wjazdu. https://goo.gl/maps/HRvggwTj9JS2  Po pierwsze częściowo jest jednokierunkowa . A po drugie dlaczego przechodzi przez budynek ?  Pozdawiam.
km2bp (2016-10-24 16:26:45+00:00): Może to jest  myjnia samochodowa ? Niestety nie ma mnie w ZG i nie jestem w stanie tego sprawdzić .
topolpavel (2016-10-24 17:29:45+00:00): Faktycznie, tam jest zakaz od strony Jana z Kolna, już poprawiłem. A ta droga wewnętrzna na terenie pks przechodzi przez budynek (drzwi garażowe z obu stron), być może to warsztat z kanałem, myjnia lub cokolwiek innego