piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_7581226 (2020-12-19 21:16:45+00:00): Hallo Negreheb, noch einmal bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/886106156 in Version #1 handelt es sich um ein bisher in OpenStreetMap noch nicht eigezeichnetes neues Gebäude. Erkläre mir bitte folgendes. Mir ist aufgefallen dass die Stadt Salzburg Deine primäre Mapping Region ist, und dass Du offenkundig aktuell Zeit genug findest, jeden einzelnen Edit von mir genau zu analysieren. Wie ist es möglich, dass ich in wenigen Tagen in Deiner Stadt!, viele viele neue noch nicht gemappte Gebäude vorfinde, die du selbst offenkundig bei Deiner eigenen Arbeit in OpenStreetMap bisher links liegen gelassen hast. Nun da ich solche Gebäude Mappe, versuchst Du mit allen Dir zur Verfügung stehenden Mitteln, meine Arbeit zu behindern. Ich bin nun wirklich ein erfahrener OpenStreetMap Mitwirkender, was um Himmels Willen stellst du erst mit den anderen Jungen OSM Mitwirkenden an, welche ebenfalls versucht in zaghaften Anfängen  an OpenStreetMap mitzuwirken. Du kannst kaum eigene Mappingarbeit in OpenStreetMap vorweisen, Du kommentierst, und kritisierst aber mit Vorliebe die Arbeit andere OpenStreetMap Mitwirkender. Wie viele Neulinge hast du hierbei mit Deinen Inquisitorischen Forderungen nach unerfüllbarer Qualität verschreckt, und so von einer weiteren Mitwirkung in OpenStreetMap vertrieben. Du bis für mich ein ganz übler Lobbyist der OpenStreetMap in seiner Entwicklung permanent schweren Schaden zufügt. Grüße Johann.

Hello Negreheb, again at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/886106156 in version # 1 is a new building that has not yet been drawn up in OpenStreetMap. Please explain the following to me. I noticed that the city of Salzburg is your primary mapping region and that you obviously find enough time to analyze every single edit by me. How is it possible that in a few days I will find many, many new, not yet mapped buildings in your city !, which you yourself have obviously left behind in your own work in OpenStreetMap. Now that I have such a building portfolio, you are trying with all the means at your disposal to hinder my work. I am now really an experienced OpenStreetMap contributor, what on earth are you going to do with the other young OSM contributors, who also tried to participate in OpenStreetMap at the beginning. You can hardly show your own mapping work in OpenStreetMap, you comment, but you prefer to criticize the work of other OpenStreetMap contributors. How many newcomers have you scared off with your Inquisitorial demands for unattainable quality, and thus driven away from further involvement in OpenStreetMap. You until, for me, a very bad lobbyist permanently inflicts serious damage on OpenStreetMap in its development. Greetings Johann.
osmviborg (2020-12-18 20:09:16+00:00): If you insist in splitting building polygons, make sure you transfer all the tags from the original polygon to the new ones. 
'building=apartments'	
'building:levels	=4'
owiecc (2020-12-18 20:13:38+00:00): I noticed that and I don't think that all the buildings were four floor (esp. the one on the south). I will pop by there and check.
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-09 21:51:00+00:00): Ein Footway kann nicht bicycle=designated haben. Bitte um Prüfung und ggfs Korrektur.
woodpeck (2021-04-28 14:00:19+00:00): It appears that in this changeset you have created a number of buildings on top of existing tennis courts. Can you have a look and repair? e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/886309952
mariotomo (2021-12-28 19:44:04+00:00): hola, todavía mapeas? te acuerdas porqué le pusiste "layer=-1" al "plaza universal"?
Frans S (2020-12-26 14:02:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A few issues.
you used the wrong imagery. See the instructions. Read here how to change it
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
and please map more precise and square the buildings you map.
See the PM I've send you with more info
Best regards and keep mapping
PT-53 (2020-12-19 07:47:18+00:00): Hallo  Stefan Karl,
in welchem Zusammenhang stehen Deine Änderungen in diesem CS zum "Main-Donau-Bodensee-Weg" ?
Ich kann hier keine OSM-Daten zum "Main-Donau-Bodensee-Weg" finden.
Fragende Grüße
Stefan Karl (2020-12-19 17:52:11+00:00): Hallo PT-53, 
Main-Donau-Bodensee-Weg ist der Hauptwanderweg 4 des Schwäbischen Albvereins. In OSM eine Superroute mit der Relation "HW 4 (Ulm - Friedrichshafen)" (2281020) als Member, die ich mit dem Changeset bearbeitet habe. 
Die Änderungen an den anderen Relationen sind durch das Splitten von Wegen entstanden.
Gruß, Stefan
PT-53 (2020-12-19 17:56:18+00:00): Hallo Stefan,
Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Grüße
Lokai (2022-01-08 06:06:34+00:00): Servus Uwe,

ich habe mit overpass turbo nach dem tag von dir gesucht.

Auf die Schnelle habe ich noch die Spitalstraße in Edenkoben gefunden. Dort ist desination zwei Mal getaggt.

Gruß
uwe-shwbl (2022-01-08 11:54:06+00:00): Hallo Lokai,
ja, das stimmte auch nicht; hab's korrigiert.
Und vielen Dank für den Tipp "overpass", das hatte ich bis jetzt noch nicht auf dem Schirm.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-18 20:57:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 95880188, 95880704.
Vinber-Pro (2020-12-19 10:01:41+00:00): Salut,
si possible on garde majuscule de la première lettre et minuscule ensuite. C'est corrigé ici :)
merci pour les ajouts
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96090743
นเรศวร (2020-12-18 21:20:43+00:00): I really don't understand the large bounding box: What has changed at https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/886309431 ?
Negreheb (2020-12-19 10:58:54+00:00): Und auch hier, Gebäude gelöscht und neu gezeichnet statt einfach anzupassen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147465932 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162879994
user_7581226 (2020-12-19 15:45:45+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis,
Lg Johann
santamariense (2021-02-16 00:54:41+00:00): Olá lucasfpiaui,

Decidir o que pode ser considerado e o que não pode ser considerado uma motorway é motivo de altos debates dentro da comunidade. 
Convido você a participar do grupo de Telegram sobre Classificação de Vias para tirar dúvidas e debater o assunto. https://telegram.me/osm_classificacao_vias

Esta rodovia que tu reclassificou como motorway tem algumas conexões em nível (sem rampa de aceleração), além do que não tem continuidade (está picotada) e nem está enraizada numa cidade de grande porte. O que a impediria de ser motorway.

[]'s

santamariense
Vinber (2020-12-19 14:20:35+00:00): (English below)
Bonjour,
il vous a été demandé :
- des commentaires plus explicites il y a 2 ans (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67034350),
- des explications sur le fait de modifier un point dont vous ne connaissez pas la réalité (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93437642), ces retours a un état antérieur étant fait plusieurs fois,
- vous en avez été informé par message privé,
- rien ne change,

Pouvez vous répondre, réagir svp ?

Bonne cartographie (les données sont faites par les interactions entre les humains !)

English :
Hello,
you have been asked :
- more explicit comments 2 years ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67034350),
- explanations on changing a point that you do not know the reality of (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93437642), these returns to a previous state being made several times,
- you have been informed by private message,
- nothing changes,

Can you answer, please react?
Good cartography (data are made by interactions between humans!)

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
yvecai (2020-12-20 07:02:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour les raquettes, c'est plutôt piste:type=hike. 
Salutations, 
Yves
jkronegg (2020-12-20 18:27:10+00:00): Bonjour Yves, 
piste:type=hike est mis automatiquement lorsque l'on choisit le type "Snowshoeing / Winter hiking trail". Mais il me semble important de faire la différence entre les parcours "raquettes" et "promenade". En effet, je m'occupe de la maintenance des pistes de ski à St-George et cela fait une différence : si des marcheurs se baladent sur la piste, cela produit de gros trous qu'il n'est pas possible de boucher avec la dameuse et la neige fond beaucoup plus vite. En revanche, si c'est des promeneurs en raquettes, l'impact sur la piste est beaucoup moins grand. Par ailleurs, certains sentiers sont explicitement réservés aux raquettes, tandis que d'autres sont aussi autorisés aux marcheurs.
Qu'en pensez-vous ?
Meilleures salutations,
Julien
yvecai (2020-12-20 18:37:37+00:00): C'est juste que sur certains way, j'ai vu piste:type=nordic;snowshoes, c'est Id qui taggue comme ça ? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885318871#map=0/46/6) 
J'avoue que dans ce cas, c'est compliqué vue les pistes raquettes sont sensées être piste:type=hike + piste:grooming =backcountry et les pistes piétons piste:type = hike + piste:grooming = classic.
Alors si elles sont communes avec une piste de fond et son damage, ça se complique. 2 ways séparées est sûrement la solution la plus simple.
jkronegg (2020-12-27 20:35:19+00:00): Non c'est un tagging manuel (mais il est bien reconnu, p.ex. par OpenSnowMap.org).
Merci pour la suggestion d'utiliser 2 ways, c'est effectivement une bonne solution lorsque les types de préparation sont différents.
yvecai (2020-12-28 10:05:45+00:00): Alors je peux assurer que Opensnowmap ne prend pas en compte la valeur 'snowshoe', vu que Opensnowmap, c'est moi :-) Mais par contre, il prend bien en compte la valeur 'nordic' quand on taggue piste:type = nordic;quelque-chose.
Salutations, 
Yves
jkronegg (2020-12-28 22:01:27+00:00): Ah, oui, effectivement, c'est une erreur de ma part. J'avais pris comme chemin de test https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/881766962#map=16/46.5228/6.2662 qui est taggé comme "piste:type=nordic;hike;snowshoe" et comme il est affiché sur Opensnowmap, j'ai pensé que c'était en raison du "snowshoe" (en réalité c'est en raison du "hike"). Il me semblait avoir vu que le "piste:type=snowshoe" était un type officiel, mais je n'arrive plus à retrouver la référence (j'ai du me tromper). Du coup je vais modifier les tags que j'ai mis en "hike" et suivre votre conseil de faire deux ways lorsqu'un seul way ne permet pas de représenter la réalité du terrain.

Merci beaucoup pour votre travail sur Opensnowmap. J'adore!
Serait-il possible d'utiliser l'image http://www.opensnowmap.org/?zoom=17&lat=46.51867&lon=6.26092&layers=snowbase&marker=false&marker=true pour remplacer la vieille carte des pistes de notre station de ski https://www.stgeorge.ch/f/activites-tourisme-loisirs/ski-alpin/plan-et-etat-pistes-alpines.asp ? (avec la mention "Données (c)www.openstreetmap.org & contributeurs ODBL, et www.opensnowmap.org CC-BY-SA." bien sûr)
yvecai (2020-12-29 07:45:01+00:00): Pour la carte, oui, c'est possible. Je peux aussi sortir une image de plus haute résolution, il suffit de me passer une copie d'écran de l'emprise voulue à webmaster_at_opensnowmap.org
Vous pouvez aussi mettre l'ancienne carte sur skimap.org pour la postérité :) 
Salutations, 
Yves
Natsuyasumi (2021-02-22 00:02:42+00:00): Hi! It seems that you have also mistakenly marked roads in this changeset as not for use by any motor vehicles (e.g. cars, busses; via the motor_vehicle=no tag).

I went ahead and fixed that, please be more careful next time :)
eagleeye666666 (2021-02-22 00:13:33+00:00): upps. thank you. accidently removed the wrong tag. I was working just with the editor removing the tags, so caught the wrong line :/
JeroenvanderGun (2020-12-18 23:37:56+00:00): Zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96093937#map=16/51.9782/4.1255&layers=N
melaniegaiagps (2020-12-18 22:02:43+00:00): Correction:  4,392 meters not 439 meters.
domeqasz (2025-02-16 19:32:38+00:00): 👎
eagleeye666666 (2025-02-19 16:34:12+00:00): dobrze ze naprawiles. wtedy mialem do celu ustawic ze nie jest dla rowery. Wtedy sie pokazowalo sie tego jako trasy do pokonanie na rower.
SomeoneElse (2020-12-18 22:14:59+00:00): It's worth expanding on "source" here I think.
From west to east, the roads into Hazelwood Castle are clearly signed as bridleways on the A64, and look very much like service roads.  I've not walked these.
Chantry Lane South I asked about on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75215036 .
The south end of Old London Road I last walked abou 40 years ago, but I really don't believe it's a tertiar now.
The north end is a bit odd - I have walked that, a couple of years ago, and the public bridleway on the track/service road starts sooner than OS OpenData StreetView suggests.
Weedling Gate into Stutton and on to Mille Lane really is a tertiary.
There are fixmes on some of these that still need checking, 
These edits were actually prompted by a series of iffy looking road classification changes that prompted comments including https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91934236 .  No reply, hence me changing those back, but with this changeset it's a bit more complicated than that, hence this extra comment.
Gazer75 (2021-01-22 22:40:12+00:00): Please stop adding a big box with residential for Austrepollen. There is no such thing. Austrepollen is a road name and a bay, not a residential area.
Jarovr (2021-01-23 08:08:23+00:00): I live in this village, so I think I know very good what the name of this residential area is.
Gazer75 (2021-01-23 11:05:04+00:00): That doesn't change the official fact that there is no residential area or village name in Kartverket data. If you feel there should be then complain to them.
Gazer75 (2021-01-23 11:07:31+00:00): Residential areas are also used as lancover for just that, a built up residential area, not for making a big random square over other landcover types like you do.
Gazer75 (2021-01-23 11:10:58+00:00): The hamlet is actually called Mauranger in Kartverket data. https://www.norgeskart.no/#!?project=norgeskart&layers=1002&zoom=14&lat=6697662.11&lon=18986.49&sok=mauranger&markerLat=6697662.110554731&markerLon=18986.487201736483&panel=searchOptionsPanel

https://stadnamn.kartverket.no/fakta/281363
Jarovr (2021-01-23 18:13:16+00:00): First of all. I live in the village Austrepollen. There are several villages in the region Mauranger. Kartverket has put the name Austrepollen in the bay, because the name means «the east bay». It is like the city York which means also «bay» (old name Jorvik). It still refers to the village/city that situates in the bay. My point is that when you are in the hamlet/village Austrepollen, it should say so in Snapchat and other apps that used Openstreetmap as a source.
Gazer75 (2021-01-23 18:17:25+00:00): Complain to the municipality and/or Kartverket if you feel its wrong. We kind of have to follow the official data if OSM is to be taken serious by gov. agencies and more.
Gazer75 (2021-01-23 18:29:39+00:00): Best option we can do in OSM for cases like this would be to add a node with place=hamlet + name=Mauranger + alt_name=Austrepollen. The node would then be put at the SSR location for Mauranger at the intersection between fv49 and fv500.
Jarovr (2021-01-24 20:33:59+00:00): Hello. Yes, I need to write a note to Kartverket that Mauranger is wrongly put in some of the ratios of the map. If you zoom out long enough you can see that Mauranger cover more villages. Interesting about the node you are writing about, is that possible to do? How could it be fixed that Austrepollen is main name in the square I have made, and that Austrepollen is a hamlet/place in the region of Mauranger? How would the alt_name be presented?
Gazer75 (2021-01-24 20:57:17+00:00): It would be just like the farm names in the area basically. A point on the map. 

How maps and apps choose to use an alt_name or loc_name depends on them. Usually i would say Mauranger as that is the main name. 

Places are not really defined as areas in OSM, but rather as points on the map. One reason for that is that there is no defined area legally or physically on the ground, and it would just lead to arguments and tagging wars.

A hamlet is just above a farm  in OSM, but below a village, so it will display sooner on maps that support the distinction. Village really should have some amenities like a store and a school. When working on an import of SSR I think the community landed on using hamlet for places defined as "bygdelag" in SSR.
Jarovr (2021-01-24 21:40:55+00:00): A couple of months ago I wrote to Kartverket because the farm name "Gjerde" was put in SSR as hamlet, and not farm name. They changed that, but instead they have put the regional name "Mauranger" as a hamlet name, which is wrong. Austrepollen they have put as the name of the bay and name of the road, and NOT as the hamlet name. Which makes things difficult when other apps and maps take their information from one layer or the other. When I use Snapchat and want to put the location, it still says Gjerde because I guess OSM haven't updated from Kartverket yet, that it is just a farm and not a hamlet. I don't know how to put alt_name or loc_name.
Gazer75 (2021-01-24 21:46:32+00:00): I think maybe Snapchat uses a 3rd party supplier of data. Someone told me it might be Mapbox, and they update their data from OSM very rarely these days as they wanted oversight to avoid bad data.
So even if we do a change in the map it might take months or years. I've seen maps in media based on OSM from Mapbox that are very old. Like on nrk.no and VG and so on.
Jarovr (2021-01-24 21:56:18+00:00): Yes, you are right. Mapbox delivers online map solutions for Facebook and Snapchat, which is again based on OSM. So a change in OSM will lead to a change in Mapbox and again to Snapchat. Even if it takes some time, it is worth a try? Would you help me with this?
Gazer75 (2021-01-24 22:02:17+00:00): I'll add a place node at the intersection that uses Austrepollen as main name and Mauranger as alt name. Please contact municipality or and/or kartverket and make a case for name change or something for this. For a name change I believe the municipality has to do it. If you gather more people in the area and contact them as a group it might help. I believe private person can only request name change of a farm they own.
Jarovr (2021-01-24 22:09:12+00:00): Ok, yes thank you. I am going to do that. I am currently working with GISLine and a project with local place names and also I am in the board of Mauranger bygdalag (regional organization), so I will make a case through that.
achillachill (2020-12-25 12:34:53+00:00): Same as https://osm.org/changeset/96263432 (https://osmcha.org/changesets/96263432)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96092569
SomeoneElse (2020-12-18 22:36:36+00:00): See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10807044 for other comments.
Negreheb (2020-12-19 10:57:49+00:00): Hier auch wieder Häsuer mit History gelöscht um sie dann einfach neu einzuzeichnen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96955285 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97666376 zum Beispiel.
user_7581226 (2020-12-19 15:46:00+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis,
Lg Johann
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-01-10 00:30:14+00:00): Reverti esta edição, Lucas voce nao deveria ter excluido isto.
portalaventura (2020-12-19 23:06:17+00:00): Você verificou cada lombada pra saber se, de fato, são faixas elevadas de pedestre, para alterar de hump para table?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96093506
AntMadeira (2020-12-20 00:06:51+00:00): Olá, portalaventura.

Todas as lombadas alteradas neste changeset tinham em comum ter sido alteradas por mim, por conseguinte, estavam erradamente etiquetadas com bump, em vez de table.

Cumprimentos,
António.
Gustavo22Soares (2021-01-12 01:11:25+00:00): olá amigo só para ter certeza você está adicionando Unidades de saúde da família??o famoso postinho?? se sim a tag correta é amenity=clinic
healthcare=clinic
DiogoBaptista98 (2020-12-21 03:08:45+00:00): tenha mais cuidado da próxima vez, tenha em atenção que todos os pontos se unem e estão conectados.
JeroenvanderGun (2020-12-18 23:37:46+00:00): Zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96092017#map=15/51.9627/4.1589&layers=N
ToniE (2020-12-19 11:52:39+00:00): Hi,

zur Frage/fixme

"An welcher Platform hält der Bus am Halt Penzberg, Bahnhof?"

scheinen die GTFS-Daten auch nicht wirklich weiter zu helfen, oder gibt es an der angegebenen Position 26 eine Haltestelle?

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/single-trip.php?feed=DE-BY-MVV&release_date=&trip_id=14.T0.19-374-s21-1.15.R

Gruß,
Toni
ToniE (2020-12-19 12:00:37+00:00): Vielleicht hilft das hier bzgl. der Frage der Fahrt durch Beuerberg?

N.B. Die online-Angebote des MVV für *Regionalbusse* (nur für diese) dürfen wir für OSM benutzen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen/Transportation/MVV-GTFS

    "Die von uns öffentlich zur Verfügung gestellten Fahrplandaten für den MVV-Regionalbusverkehr dürfen für OSM genutzt werden."

    "Die von uns angebotenen GTFS-Daten stehen unter der Creative Commons Attribution License (cc-by). Als Quellenangabe notieren Sie bitte: "Münchner Verkehrs- und Tarifverbund GmbH (MVV)" sowie das Datum des Abrufs. Die Daten aus unserem GTFS-Feed dürfen ausdrücklich für OpenStreetMap verwendet werden. In diesem Fall genügt es, im Source-Tag als Herkunft die Münchner Verkehrs- und Tarifverbund GmbH (MVV) und die Versionsnummer des Feeds anzugeben."

Gruß,
Toni
ToniE (2020-12-19 12:01:22+00:00): Hilft dieser Link? Sorry hatte vergesen C&P zu machen ...

https://efa.mvv-muenchen.de/index.html?itdTime=0856&itdDate=20201221&language=de&name_origin=Wolfratshausen%2C%20Wolfratshausen&name_destination=penzberg&itdTripDateTimeDepArr=dep#trip@origdest
dmo84 (2020-12-19 16:15:33+00:00): Ja, ich bin mir nur nicht sicher, wie zuverlässig diese Daten sind.
1) Die Routenführung in Beuerberg wurde bisher anders gemappt.
2) An der Haltestelle Roche Haupttor ist die Darstellung korrekt - deckt sich mit der Info an der Haltestellt
3) Am Bahnhof bin ich mir eben noch unsicher. Da ich aber die Tage eh dort vorbeikomme, werde ich das verifizieren
ToniE (2020-12-19 17:17:59+00:00): Na ja, zu 1): ist drchaus möglich, dass die OSM-Route durch Beuerberg falsch ist.

3) prima. Die Positionen lauf GTFS weichen manchmal von OSM ab, ohne dass man (ich) weiß, was korrekt ist - ich kenne mich dort halt nicht aus. Manchmal hilft dann mapillary.com aber die Bilder gibt es nicht für "überall".
eggie (2020-12-19 07:29:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Gazer75 (2020-12-19 20:13:03+00:00): Why keep changing this from official plans? The final road will be imported from NVDB when its done anyway.
Otenkiya (2021-02-02 13:26:17+00:00): 猪ノ鼻道路開通に伴って、いつ現道が国道から県道へ移管されたのですか？　開通時点（12/13)では現道の移管が行われていないのは確認しています。
aharvey (2020-12-22 03:43:07+00:00): hi for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319518760/history you can just delete the construction tags and add the landuse, eg landuse=residential tag
Warin61 (2023-02-14 04:46:48+00:00): Hi,
The DCS base map says that there are 2 Rural Fire Brigades here;
Oak Flats and Wollongong Headquarters... 

But the DCS base map is confused - upto 4 Rural Fire Services here in this locality when zoomed out! So maybe these are in addition to your entries?????
JBMD (2023-02-14 06:58:00+00:00): There's 3 brigades/services here: Oak flats RFB, Illawarra Support RFB, and Ilawarra fire control. Wollongong headquaters doesn't exist and I'll remove it. 

In addition Oak flats is W of the support brigade so I'll move that too
Warin61 (2023-02-14 09:39:35+00:00): Thanks. 
I add the extras after the above message .. 
I'll be checking the lot of NSW fire stations and brigades once I'm through doing this 'housekeeping' .. that will take a while. I'' make 2 lists of what OSM has and compare that with the official lists .. then I'll work on the discrepancies (both any missing and any extras).
mueschel (2020-12-21 17:45:17+00:00): Please check your changes here - there is a huge amount of errors shown in JOSM. Please fix them and don't ignore them before upload.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2020-12-21 17:50:32+00:00): thank you, and will be fixed and you can see my last edits that i did fix some of them and the other will be on next upload