piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2019-08-27 18:40:29+00:00): Hello Ganesh,

access = destination is also fine for me.

Regards Georg V.
gseethar (2019-09-03 11:16:03+00:00): Hi Georg V,

We have stopped giving private to the segments (Like the ones entering the Gas station or parking - which can also be used as a Via segment). However we are still not able to confirm whether it is right as per OSM regulations to give Access=Destination. We are working on this. Will update once we have clearer picture.

Regards,
Ganesh
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
bxl-forever (2019-09-03 09:23:36+00:00): Hello,

You seem to have been making several changes at once on the map, mostly diplomatic offices.

I wish to inform you that your changes are triggering multiple validation issues on the map; you could see an example here: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#username=RudolpheDeer&zoom=15&lat=50.84517&lon=4.38478&item=5060&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=

It’s cool you want to improve the map, but I must inform you that the naming conventions for international institutions—especially in a multilingual city—is really tricky.

Would you please be so kind as to explain the intended changes.  What did you actually mean to update?  Does it come from a community recommendation?
trial (2022-01-12 12:28:59+00:00): Hi brl-forever, I was about to ask  Glenn Plas on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64118720

There is a challenge on MapRoulette to add French names to embassies, and we use colloquial names, not long names) 

I've 2 questions: 
target=BE,LU,EU => then EU isn't it?

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/223463598
now name=alt_name:fr - alt_name:nl
should we use the long names (bilingual long names are long long names but I don't want to decide for Belgians) or move the long names for official_names?
Glenn Plas (2022-01-12 23:00:17+00:00): Hi, the OSM-BE consensus has always been for bilingual "FR - NL" for streetnames and other names.  With space dash space in between them.  We don't use the alt_names afaik, it's been a consensus between our both communities and has no political influence.  I'm not sure I understand what is meant with colloquial names, I understand the word but I fail to imagine a real life example here.
bxl-forever (2022-01-13 00:07:43+00:00): My comment was written more than 2 years ago.  As I recall, the problem with validation was that the `name` tag didn’t match some translations because one had been simplified and not the other.

In bilingual Brussels, Osmose expects `name` to match the concatenation of `name:fr` and `name:nl`.

Some names were simplified, e.g. replacing "Ambassade van de Republiek Haïti" with "Ambassade van Haïti" whereas `name:fr` and `name:nl` were not changed accordingly.  That was the problem I noticed, and which we still have to clean up.

The `target` key can accomodate multiple values.  target=BE;LU;EU should be fine.  (Notice the semicolon as a separator.)
Glenn Plas (2022-01-13 00:13:09+00:00): I remember that problem now indeed.  Didn't notice the reaction on your initial comment was 2 years apart bxl4ever :)

I've written a program to analyse that, but I stopped using it since the accents on capitals at the time I didn't acount for and an official street name from Brussels was impossible to get, they still don't put accents in Urbis database afaik on capitals, but it can probably be adapted quickly to just check embassies instead of streetnames like I did at the time.  We can discuss this in matrix channel and coordinate the effort.
trial (2022-01-13 11:27:08+00:00): Glenn, https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/master/plugins/Name_Multilingual.py#L37 already dose the job: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#users=trial&zoom=18&lat=50.814966&lon=4.35126&level=2&tags=&fixable=&item=xxxx&issue_uuid=67de56a4-2944-605c-e469-e361711ca94b
Glenn Plas (2022-01-13 14:43:15+00:00): Ok, thanks .  I know it detects it, but I'm talking about a program I wrote that detects it and fixes it automatically in an JOSM xml osm file automatically, it actually works already, just not made for embassies.  But don't worry, it's besides the scope of the topic.  The detection is easy.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
viloan (2019-08-23 16:00:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-08-23 16:02:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Constable (2019-08-24 09:51:32+00:00): Ciao, occhio che con questa tua modifica (https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=73674988) hai corrotto tutta la relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1329800 , che adesso infatti non viene più mostrata come area "verde" sulla mappa principale. Fai attenzione a quello che modifichi prima di salvare.
Cerco di correggere
Grazie, ciao!
Rataplan1 (2019-08-24 14:44:14+00:00): Grazie a te
non mi ero accorto.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
muralito (2019-08-24 11:39:26+00:00): Esto no esta correcto.
"Ruta 63 y Ruta 64" en todo caso va en addr:full

Para el addr:street va solo una de las dos, la del acceso.

Y como en los casos no urbanos, no llevan addr:housnumber.

No se de donde lo estan sacando, si es tema de error de datos o del proceso de importacion...
muralito (2019-08-24 11:36:47+00:00): el "km" lo pondria como "addr:km" por ser componente de la direccion. habria que ver de documentar esa etiqueta.

lo que es claro es que ninguna direccion rural tiene que llevar housenumber.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
muralito (2019-08-24 11:31:43+00:00): Probablemente erroneo el addr:street y no llevan housenumber.
muralito (2019-08-24 11:33:57+00:00): Habria que revisar si lo que esta mal son los datos o el proceso en estos casos de direcciones rurales, pero algo no se ve bien.
Palolo (2019-08-27 13:49:36+00:00): Please make sure to trace the buildings accurately. A tin roof will likely have square corners.
felipeeugenio (2019-10-19 12:19:37+00:00): Estimado. El tag building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo. ya fue corregido. saludos
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
muralito (2019-08-24 11:27:30+00:00): Los repetidos sugieren que algo no está bien.

Todos esos puntos con el mismo addr:street" dispersos por varias vialidades también sugieren que hay algo erróneo.

El addr:street tiene que corresponderse uno a uno con la vialidad de acceso al predio.

Es la vialidad que hay que tomar para ir a esa dirección, por eso no puede dispersarse por varias vialidades como pasa acá.
edathy (2019-08-24 18:43:19+00:00): Your tracings are very inexact and therefore have been removed: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73702196
flohoff (2020-05-23 18:55:24+00:00): Moin,
ich habe das hier mal wieder korrigiert. Die Rentruper Straße ist nicht gesperrt für LKW sondern Anlieger frei für LKW. Damit ist das ein hgv=destination.

Das motor_vehicle=designated habe ich auch entfernt. Macht ja bei Straßen keienn Sinn.
Ach ja - Schilder alle bei Mapillary auch sichtbar.

Das Land und Forstwirtschaft frei bei den Schildern schenke ich mir mal. 

Garthoffs wissen das und der Rest macht da ja glaube ich keine Landwirtschaft mehr.

Flo
felipeeugenio (2019-10-19 12:19:02+00:00): Estimado. Gracias por sus aportes. Algunas Observaciones:
Los nombres de calles tienen que ir con su nombre oficial. Nada más.
Moví el nombre de la parcelación parea crear un barrio, pero mezclar ambos es incorrecto.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
FraMauro (2019-08-27 14:06:44+00:00): Attenzione, prima di una modifica così pesante consiglierei un confronto con l'utente / gli utenti responsabili di quanto fatto prima.
In particolare in questo caso i dati da te cancellati sembrano essere potenzialmente da fonte *più* affidabile delle immagini satellitari!
user_5359 (2019-08-24 04:34:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Are you really a museum? According to the website you are rather a shop for clothes
art@cootersplace (2019-08-24 14:45:19+00:00): Our new Pigeon Forge location, which is relocating from Gatlinburg, is a Dukes of Hazzard Museum with a very successful gift shop.  We advertise locally as a museum which most accurately represents us as a local point of interest.  The museum portion of our building, in which we are constructing a detailed replica of Cooter’s garage from the show, will house replica vehicles and memorabilia from the Dukes of Hazzard and is free admission.  At all of our current locations, we host guest appearances from cast members of the tv show and other events for avid fans.
user_5359 (2019-08-24 15:19:51+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. I have included part of the explanation in the key description.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Akkurator (2019-08-26 00:34:55+00:00): Lieber OSMchecker,
warum hast du den geplanten Tunnel schon wieder gelöscht?
Wurde die Planung inzwischen aufgegeben? Ich habe davon nichts mitbekommen.
Grüße,
Akkurator.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
liz1337 (2021-09-13 10:27:46+00:00): Ich glaube, hierbei handelt es sich um einen Fehleintrag. Vor Ort ist lediglich eine Anhöhe mit einer Wiese, die möglicherweise ein Treffpunkt ist, aber keine Mikronation.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
iWowik (2020-01-19 11:20:12+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики и вносите адресную информацию.

Обычно номера домов не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, где вы их берете?
datendelphin (2019-08-24 13:16:36+00:00): Das fee=no beim Zugerland stimmt nicht, der Parkplatz kostet
Evzhcl (2019-08-24 13:36:46+00:00): Jaein. Für die recyclingstation muss man zwar ein Ticket lösen, jedoch reicht die kostenlose Zeit locker um zu entsorgen.
datendelphin (2019-08-24 15:17:29+00:00): Haha jein ist wohl das richtige. Dass der Parkplatz nur zum entsorgen ist, weiss der Kartennutzer ja nicht. Und die 15 Minuten Zeit, um das Center wieder zu verlassen ohne zu zahlen, sind auch nicht offiziell.
Frans S (2019-09-03 07:42:27+00:00): Hi Daryosh
See my previous comment about image and squaring and tagging 
best regards
Basstoelpel (2020-02-11 10:09:04+00:00): Buildings in this changeset do not match with aerial images.
sdicke (2019-08-24 12:30:09+00:00): Why? Is there any reason to remove harmless tags with no wrong information?
PT-53 (2019-08-24 13:25:12+00:00): Hallo sdicke,
lies dir mal diesen forum-Beitrag durch:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62480
Grüße
Mond00 (2019-08-24 17:19:29+00:00): Der Einntrag wurde auf der Osmose Webseite als veraltet angezeigt, daher ging ich davon aus das dies so stimmt. 
Beispiel aktuell in Bochum noch vorhanden: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=17&lat=51.490138&lon=7.196313&item=9002&level=1%2C2%2C3&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&tags=&fixable=josm

Wenn ich den Link von PT-53 richtig verstehe, können die EInträge weiterhin gelöscht werden oder?
user_5359 (2019-08-24 04:30:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
atomwaffen (2019-10-03 20:15:19+00:00): Hi The Dude,

please investigate https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/717724673 and neighboring buildings: No built structures, just final product storage (probably shingles).

Kind regards
chilledfrogs (2019-08-23 18:56:53+00:00): There is a discrepancy in the street name between Rue de la Plage and Rue Bastaraud...
user_5359 (2019-08-24 04:28:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
Rhyknowscerious (2019-08-26 14:10:07+00:00): The addresses are very strange here. 1090 S Parker Rd is the official address for the property but its main office physically located on S Quince St. The node is correctly placed although the office street address makes it not seem that way.
user_5359 (2019-08-26 14:30:42+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. However, the point is also outside all the buildings shown in the aerial photograph. I was once so free and entered most of the buildings in question.
Rhyknowscerious (2019-08-26 22:34:50+00:00): Sorry, I can't figure out how to show aerial photographs to double check the building locations. I also don't see any building outlines on the view that I am able to see now.
user_5359 (2019-08-27 04:24:44+00:00): Hello, If you use the editor iD (in the browser) you can switch the aerial images. Use the fourth icon (layers) and switch from Bing to Mapbox).
viloan (2019-08-23 18:50:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Leo Slager (2019-08-24 01:21:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
CENTRALHUB (2019-08-24 04:00:26+00:00): Hi, 

It's recommended to check http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2018/ before importing any data automatically. Town, township and subdistrict are changing frequently in China. It's necessary to check the newest version of the administrative code. For example, 魏庄镇 is transformed to 魏庄街道. Here is a list of town-level unit in Fengqiu:

蒲西街道办事处
蒲东街道办事处
南蒲街道办事处
蒲北街道办事处
魏庄街道办事处
丁栾镇
樊相镇
恼里镇
常村镇
赵堤镇
孟岗镇
满村镇
苗寨镇
张三寨镇
方里镇
佘家镇
芦岗乡
武邱乡
河南长垣起重工业园区管理委员会.

I saw you are making change in other location in Henen, please ensure applying the newest admin data.

Thanks
CENTRALHUB (2019-08-24 04:01:05+00:00): Typo: that's the list for Changyuan
katpatuka (2019-08-24 07:14:21+00:00): Thanks - didn't know about the 2018 link. From time to time I had cross-checked names at the old 2013 link at http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2013/ ...

Since I cannot read, write or speak Chinese my only reference is wikidata and zhwiki - the latter sometimes seemingly not being up-to-date...
katpatuka (2019-08-24 07:29:19+00:00): I see that you've created two new 魏庄街道 nodes, the second one tagged with place=suburb - is the latter intended as label for a relation?

Don't know how the Chinese osm community prefers to tag all 街道 - up to now I've been using place=town - would you say place=suburb is more appropriate?
CENTRALHUB (2019-08-28 21:03:32+00:00): I don't feel there is any perfect standard in Chinese community. I also feel the OSM classification (city/town/village/suburban/quarter/neighborhood) is not fitting the situation in China. Personally I will apply an "isolation" rule:
For subdistrict (jiedao): if it's part of a city urban area, I use quarter. If it's isolated from the urban area, I will use town.
For district (qu), if it's part of a city urban area, I use suburban. If it's isolated from the urban area, I will use city.
And I use "Village" and "Neighborhood" in OSM for the smallest admin unit in China (cun/village and shequ/community).
But anyway, if we can tag the admin code or the admin level +admin type(china_class) for all admin units, we can improve it easily once we come up with a good standard. But the problem is that we even don't have good community standard for these tags...
katpatuka (2019-08-29 05:43:18+00:00): You're right! ;) The Chinese administrative system is really strange and additionally seems to change too often: counties are becoming cities and later districts; townships becoming towns and later subdistricts the more urbanization increases. Chinese community is still in development I guess...  ZhWiki is way behind compared with http://www.stats.gov.cn data - at least in urban areas in Henan (example 涧西区). Me not capable to speak or write Chinese is moving pages in zhwiki and fixing wikidata... ;) https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:用户贡献/Katpatuka and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Katpatuka )
Glassman (2024-12-09 23:39:31+00:00): Do you remember where you got the name, Alice Hotel, for the building on the corner of S King St and Maynard Ave S? DWG received a report that it should be Alps Hotel. The hotel is tagged properly as a node. I'm guessing the building was once the Alice Hotel.
Omnific (2024-12-12 02:13:46+00:00): I was probably out walking the area, but there's a real possibility some note I made as I was walking got autocorrected and I unintentionally used that.
Glassman (2024-12-12 02:49:20+00:00): There is a business Alices's Floral Designs there which does seem to imply the building may have been named Alice. I'm going to ask a friend that frequents the area if he knows or can find out.
wls3 (2019-08-23 19:31:59+00:00): I'm sorry; why do you keep removing the Description tag?  I can see if it was an SEO thing, but it's not.
AnonymousAlligator (2019-08-23 19:55:53+00:00): I tend to be a bit overzealous about deleting description tags, sorry.

Some of your descriptions in the past have been a bit too advertisy, like (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73231862). According to the wiki, OpenStreetMap data needs to be objective and verifiable.

Thanks for bringing this up, I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes :)
skquinn (2022-08-23 04:39:58+00:00): To me "full line of" is where it starts to become ad copy/marketing. Once you take that out, to me it seems like it's all objective.
wls3 (2022-08-23 22:23:41+00:00): Then skquinn, you're more than welcome to take it out bro.  Knock yourself out. ;)
skquinn (2022-08-24 01:37:37+00:00): Done, see changeset 125293656
wls3 (2022-08-25 00:07:38+00:00): LGTM.