piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:19:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072431 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:19:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072429 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
GerdP (2015-10-16 07:52:04+00:00): please review this and many more changesets in this area:
tags with prefix addr: should not be used 
for highways, please use the corresponding 
tags with prefix is_in:
zarl (2016-05-10 07:51:48+00:00): Hi Glücki,

einerseits gibt es gute Gründe, um die eigenen Changesets zu kommentieren:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments#Warum_sollte_ich_.C3.84nderungssatz-Kommentare_nutzen.3F

Und ganz konkret hast du hier Pfade in Tracks umgewandelt, ohne dich aber um dazugehörige tags wie tracktype zu kümmern. Die vorherigen Mapper haben sich da eher an im Wiki hinterlegte Konventionen ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Eigenst.C3.A4ndiger_Weg ) gehalten und die Wege als Pfad eingetragen.

Viele Grüsse,
Zarl
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:19:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072428 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
GerdP (2015-10-26 10:42:41+00:00): please review Humbert Road:
way 363784911 was tagged  
highway=tunnel 
I've corrected that to highway=tertiary
Why do you think that it  is a tunnel?
The covering way 308522383 is tagged 
bridge=yes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:19:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072427 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:19:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072426 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Carto'Cité (2021-12-28 14:10:46+00:00): Bonjour Ploucman007,
Un contributeur a repassé des chemins que tu avais explicitement décrits comme interdit (et pas inaccessible c'est très différents) aux vélos : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108560056. Je l'ai questionné pour savoir s'il s'agissait d'une erreur à l'origine ou si les règles avaient évoluées. N'hésite pas à nous renseigner sur ta connaissance du terrain. Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Nighto (2015-08-26 19:02:24+00:00): Marcio, vc visitou esse shopping in loco? Sabe dizer se tem bicicletário? Obrigado!
Sds, Arlindo
Thundercel (2015-08-26 19:50:56+00:00): Olá Arlindo! Fui a esse pequeno shopping no inicio deste mes de ago/2015 para na loja AutoGlass trocar o parabrisa do meu carro que havia trincado. Não observei se tinha bicicletário.
Nighto (2015-08-26 20:03:40+00:00): Beleza. Caso você o visite novamente, poderia reparar nisso por gentileza? Existe uma lei municipal que obriga shopping centers a terem bicicletários, mas é difícil visitar todos para verificar do seu cumprimento. Obrigado :)
Thundercel (2015-08-26 20:28:22+00:00): Confesso que não espero visita-lo novamente já que fui levado a ele devido a um sinistro ocorrido com meu veículo. De qualquer forma ficarei atento para esse tipo de observação.
Nighto (2015-08-26 20:29:11+00:00): Tá certo. Obrigado mesmo assim :)
vint (2015-08-04 08:00:29+00:00): чувак, может я чего не понимаю, почему ты убрал residential ? вроде в wiki нет правила, что нельзя residenial ставить на place. а с residential mapnik рисует карту красивее как-то, особенно на zoom==9,10,11
freeExec (2015-08-04 08:23:41+00:00): Мы не рисуем для красоты, а вносим корректные данные, заливка всех и вся сереньким явно не корректна. Хочется серенького, пожалуйста, но выглядеть это должно вот так http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/54.7418/49.2160
vint (2015-08-04 09:01:59+00:00): ok, согласен
Mashin (2015-08-03 19:44:34+00:00): Again, You drew building on top of another building. 
I fixed it for you.
mueschel (2024-05-11 18:39:45+00:00): Hi,
it's a long time since, but this road got a strange 'maxweight_1' tag. Could you check that?
Coilans (2024-05-11 20:54:52+00:00): Hi, 
You are right, something is not correct here. I don't know which maxweight of the 2 is correct but it's close by to where I live so I will go and check on site when I get a chance. Thanks
Coilans (2024-05-13 21:47:56+00:00): Hi, 
I have checked and the maxweight is 19t. It's now corrected in the map.
Thanks
zimba (2015-08-04 15:46:07+00:00): Hey Olaaf,

Die Editoren koennen Polygone rechteckig machen (im iD: Shortcut "S"). Verwende das bitte wenn moeglich, die Haeuser die du eingezeichnet haben schauen naemlich noch aus wie Kraut & Rueben.

lg
Mashin (2015-08-03 18:58:44+00:00): Hi,
I don't see how this geometry has been corrected. You just drew new buildings on top of already existing building.
btw: what is special about the newly drawn parts that they have to be separate buildings?
Sei Han (2015-08-07 14:04:15+00:00): I'll edit 100 Tower Parkway so that the Ashmun St buildings and the Tower Parkway building don't overlap. They're physically the same building, but they're quarantined and have different addresses with different entrances.
Jojo4u (2015-10-15 19:12:14+00:00): Ich würde gern die meisten noch vorhandenen path/designated/designated Wege im Park Villa Berg um die designated berauben. Der einzige Weg mit DE:240 an beiden Enden ist der Leinsweg. 
Dieses Schild (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3679166315) könnte auch für den folgenden Weg stehen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3679166315), aber der endet perverserweise in einem Fußweg, kann also nicht sein ;)
Mashin (2015-08-03 18:07:29+00:00): Hi,
and thanks for contributing. 
1) Are you sure that address of this location is 41 Sachem Street?
2) amenity=university is used to tag whole area of universities. Yale already has it's area tagged. I would suggest deleting or retaging.
Sei Han (2015-08-07 14:16:56+00:00): Hi Mashin, 
Yale University officially has this area marked as 41 Sachem Street, although there is no longer a building here. If I recall correctly, this area used to house the Pierson-Sage Power Plant a long time ago. For university usage, the area here is marked as 41 Sachem St. I'll retag the area. Please let me know if this area needs further edits.
zimba (2015-08-04 15:56:14+00:00): Ähm... nur weil hier das "access" Tag fehlt, sollte man nicht gleich rumlöschen, sondern sich informieren wies richtig geht: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

-> Weg wieder hinzugefuegt mit den richtigen Tags

lg
schmidler (2015-08-05 09:21:02+00:00): Ähm ... nur weil da jemand mal auf meinem Grundstück spazierengegangen ist möchte ich die auch verbotene Möglichkeit nicht auf OpenStreetMal veröffentlicht haben. Das Löschen hatte also seinen Grund.

Bitte mach Deinen Eintrag wieder rückgängig!
zimba (2015-08-07 12:43:52+00:00): Nein, hier wird nichts geloescht. Das die strasse wirklich dort ist, hast du gerade eben noch einmal bestaetigt, und dieses faktum koennen wir eintragen, unabhaengig davon, ob es dem grundstueckseigentuemer jetzt passt oder nicht.

Auch ist die strasse mittlerweile mit den passenden zugangstags ausgestattet, kein Router wird dort jemanden versehentlich durchschicken.

Wir mappen z.B. auch firmengelaende oder militaerische sperrbezirke, in denen auch niemand spazieren gehen sollte. Einfach weil sie dort sind, und wenn sie jemand eintragen will, dann darf er das.

Es ist wahrscheinlich auch gar niemand auf deinem grundstueck herumspaziert, sondern es wurde von luftbildern abgemalt. Willst du dich auch bei Bing oder Google beschweren, weil man die strasse auf ihren satellitenbildern erkennen kann?
Mashin (2015-08-03 18:54:27+00:00): Hi, 
you just drew a building over a part of existing building. + Your newly drawn building is less precise. Can you please fix that?
Mashin (2015-08-03 18:52:27+00:00): Hi,
you just drew a building over a part of existing building. Can you delete the overlapping part?
joost schouppe (2019-07-13 09:00:46+00:00): Jo, you seem to have created this way as a connection between Mouzaïve and Laforêt. It is mapped as unclassified, but it's actually just a gravel forest track IMHO (after having driven it, I wouldn't recommend normal drivers to go there). Do you remember why you classified it as "unclassified" and not "track"?
Mashin (2015-08-04 05:36:19+00:00): Hi,
sport center not correctly tagged as amenity=university.
Mashin (2015-08-04 07:13:24+00:00): Smilow field center is the building next to the are you tagged. 
Fixed.
Mashin (2015-08-03 22:04:31+00:00): Hi Sei Han,
Temple Medical Center Building is already traced in OSM. It is the larger building you drawn your new building into. 
Please always double check that the object is not already in OSM before you upload.
naoliv (2016-02-01 11:58:41+00:00): Seandebasti, don't join/glue the landuses to the highways.
naoliv (2016-06-09 12:42:24+00:00): "Ingaí" é nome alternativo da Fazenda Angahy?
anderfo (2015-10-07 10:49:30+00:00): Hei,
hvor egnet er denne stien med sykkel, egentlig? Det ser ut til å være mye myr. Jeg vil foreslå å bruke class:bicycle:mtb for å angi hvor egnet den er med (terreng)sykkel.

Anders
barlind (2015-10-07 11:12:07+00:00): Hei,
Jeg skjønner godt at du er skeptisk siden det ser ut som den går gjennom myrer på kartet.

Jeg har bare syklet stien en gang sommeren 2014 (vestover) og vil si at den hovedsaklig er fin og tørr og ikke utmerker seg hverken positivt eller negativt. Det ser mye verre ut på kartet enn i virkeligheten. Noen korte partier nærmere Breidsethovda (lengst vest) kvalifiserer kanskje til en negativ class:bicycle:mtb, men det kan jeg ikke ta på stående fot.

Forøvrig er den merket av Hemsedal turistkontor og en del av sykkelturen "Fanitullvegen rundt" (http://ut.no/tur/2.7880/). Strekningen mellom Trettestølane og Breidset (ikke tegnet inn på OSM) er hovedsaklig myr og lite egnet for sykling og jeg vil tro det er den det refereres til som myr i turbeskrivelsen.
bagis (2015-08-03 19:44:27+00:00): I made an error in the comment, it should have pointed to note #391892.
mueschel (2015-08-04 19:59:56+00:00): Hi Kelerei,
on some ways north of Laingsburg you added access:hgv:lanes keys - I changed that to hgv:lanes which is the usual way to tag vehicle dependent restrictions (compare http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access).

Cheers & Happy Mapping,
Jan
Kelerei (2015-08-24 13:19:32+00:00): Hi Jan,

Thanks for fixing my mistake.  I've gotten it right before -- this should teach me not to do things when I'm half asleep.  (:

--K
eggie (2017-09-10 20:09:25+00:00): Eén edit jaren terug.. daarna nuttig werk voor 't HOT-project. Ik stuur je alsnog een welkomstbericht per PB.
maraf24 (2015-09-27 13:30:46+00:00): Autostrada Sudecka- to jest nazwa oficjalna? 
Bo w Zieleńcu EMUiA sugeruje, że nazwa oficjalna to Zieleniec, co by pasowało, skoro to dzielnica Dusznik.
TERYT to potwierdza.
jacek_zwik (2015-09-27 19:37:18+00:00): Wiesz tą nazwę widziałem na innych mapach, przewodnikach oraz https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droga_wojewódzka_nr_389.
Opis większej części drogi sudeckiej (po niemiecku) znajdziesz tutaj
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudetenstraße. Można ją wrzucić pod nazwę alternatywną (dodatkową) nie będę miał pretensji.
maraf24 (2015-09-27 20:22:21+00:00): Zaczekam jeszcze na import adresów w Dusznikach-Zdroju, wtedy się okaże czy faktycznie ulica musi się nazywać Zieleniec.
user_599436 (2015-08-04 02:34:23+00:00): You've removed the building=roof tag from the pavilion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156742493 and changed the amenity=shower tag to amenity=toilets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2455446190) thereby duplicating this feature: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156742494. If these acts were not intentional, could you please correct them when you get the chance?

Also, features that have been duplicated such as Brae Loch Inn, Oneida Savings Bank, Buyea's True Value, Cazenovia Public Library can be consolidated once all the relevant tags are copied from the old feature to the new one.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Nidron (2015-08-03 20:20:40+00:00): Fuck det syns ju inget!
ToeBee (2015-08-04 23:21:27+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. That was a pretty respectable first edit! I've been mapping in Manhattan, KS for a few years now and keep an eye out for new users in Kansas. 

I see you added a lot of businesses but didn't include names on most of them. What's up with that? :)

Also, I'm guessing you are using Internet Explorer? If you click the "Edit" button in another browser it should launch a newer editor that is (IMO) even easier to use. Just an FYI.
Mashin (2015-08-04 05:33:25+00:00): Hi,
are you sure that this is now called Schwarzman Center?
All I can find is University Commons.
Mashin (2015-08-04 07:22:38+00:00): According to this, Schwartzman Center opens in 2020. 
Reverting.
http://news.yale.edu/2015/05/11/landmark-gift-alumnus-stephen-schwarzman-establish-first-its-kind-campus-center-yale
naoliv (2015-08-03 21:34:05+00:00): A Vila Bananal e a Vila Alegria não existem?
Emsanator (2015-08-04 07:19:38+00:00): Please English comment
Hedaja (2015-08-04 07:29:43+00:00): sry was just a very small area in Germany.
I accidentially delete a wrong turn restriction and corrected my mistake. I think the changeset got that big because I previously corrected some typos.
Hedaja (2015-08-04 07:41:16+00:00): ok I found the problem.  The changeset number got cut off because I copied the '#' too and reverted the wrong changeset. (Now I understand why I couldn't revert the deleted Relation xD)
I think I fixed it now.
Hjart (2015-08-06 11:28:56+00:00): Pga en routingfejl (2 stier der endte meget tæt på hinanden har jeg ændret det grønne område mellem Lodsvænget og Markvænget. Vær opmærksom på at praksissen med at forbinde diverse polygoner med vejnettet (highway=*) øger risikoen for uheldige fejl på vejnettet plus gør det sværere at tjekke for og rette disse fejl.
bbmiller (2015-09-04 19:08:46+00:00): "Do not know flow" is cute, but we probably don't want to go making up names for things. ;-)

FYI if you switch the background imagery in iD to "USGS Topographic Maps," you can often get the names of rivers and lakes from there.

Lastly, I think this particular waterway is more properly categorized as a drain (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain) and sure enough, that's what the USGS topos name it. (I've already updated the name and tagging, this is just for future reference.)
Kalosze (2020-11-12 00:17:42+00:00): Wygląda na to, że jest bałagan z adresami we wsi Brzeziny. Wg geoportalu powiatu myszkowskiego 
https://sip-mapa.powiatmyszkowski.pl/opegiekamap/ 
adresy powinny być inne.

Dodatkowo dublujemy agroturystykę "Zacisze":
A. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4867143068
B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833673010

Powinna znajdować się ona pod adresem Brzeziny 1. Chyba, że mają dwie lokalizacje, w co wątpię. Lokalizację B odwiedziłem osobiście i potwierdzam, że Zacisze jest przynajmniej tam.
5m4u9 (2015-08-04 02:39:21+00:00): Bienvenida! Gracias por contribuir al mapa de todos...

En general hay algunas cosas que te equivocaste, cuando tengas tiempo corrígelas:

* Nombre de calles, sin la zona y con el formato "Calle 15"

* Mayúsculas, procura no usar las mayúsculas salvo para la primera letra o cuando sea una sigla.

* Sentido calles, si puedes ayuda marcando que calles son de doble sentido o simple

Pregunta si tienes dudas :)
tekim (2015-08-04 03:26:41+00:00): Nice job on adding land cover in RMNP!
joelholdsworth (2015-08-04 20:41:30+00:00): Thank you - it's great to hear from a local mapper. I recently moved here from London and I'm finding that adding detail to the map is a very helpful way to gain familiarity with the area.

The polygon I have added here is extremely coarse - I have done much finer work in the Bear Lake area by tracing Bing, but because it isn't really possible to do the whole outline in a single sitting, I have added this polygon as a place-holder.

Please feel free to add detail. I find the JOSM Improve Way Accuracy tool particularly effective at doing this. Also if you have any ground knowledge, that would be particularly useful because it can sometime be hard to delimit natural=wood, natural=scrub and landuse=grass.

I have been mostly using segmented-outline multipolygons to add these areas, so that adjacent land-cover areas can share segment ways in their outline.

Finally, you seem to be an experienced mapper, and I was wondering if you had any knowledge about the labelling of National Forests in the US. They all seem to have been labelled with landuse=forest - but this is incorrect because this tag implies implies that the whole area is a managed forest, and Mapnik renders it as a massive green blob - which obscures any more detailed land-cover information. I believe US National Forests should be labelled with boundary=protected_area;protect_class=6. But it appears that these tags are not rendered at all. It's strange because I would expect it to be rendered similarly to boundary=national_park. Are you aware of any discussions about the correct tagging of National Forests?
tekim (2015-08-04 21:28:50+00:00): Hi Joel,

Welcome to Colorado USA!  We certainly could use more mappers.

> Please feel free to add detail.   
I already have ;-)  BTW, thanks for respecting my existing work around the old ski area at Hidden Valley.

> The polygon I have added here is extremely coarse
That is the way to do it, start coarse and add detail... unlike what I did at Hidden Valley.

>  I find the JOSM Improve Way Accuracy tool particularly effective at doing this.    
Yes, JOSM, and the Way Accuracy Tool are outstanding! I am in the process of trying to learn how to develop plug ins for JOSM.  

> Also if you have any ground knowledge,  
Are you familiar with Mapillary?  I have started adding photos to Mapillary for RMNP.  For example: http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Y_ramljQYRLjUaJ-NL4jQg/photo  Also, there is a JOSM plugin for Mapillary.  

> ...labelling of National Forests in the US
There has been endless debate on the US mailing list about this.  I don't agree with it, but the current practice seems to be to use all of the tags that you mentioned on each National Forest. National Forests in the US are "managed" but they are not necessarily "forested" and even if they are forested, they may not be managed for timber, but rather for livestock grazing, mining and various forms of recreation (in some cases the trees that exist have little commercial value). Many of the ski resorts in Colorado are on National Forest lands.  The National Forests are no more protected - and in some ways less protected - than private property. To further complicate things, there may be Wilderness Areas within National Forests that *are* protected.  By law there can be no motorized or wheeled vehicles, and no permanent structures in these areas.  Finally, National Forests have "private in holdings" - that is private land, but over which the National Forest Service has some jurisdiction.
joelholdsworth (2015-08-04 23:35:46+00:00): > thanks for respecting my existing work around the old ski area at Hidden Valley.
Of course! That's high quality data.

> Are you familiar with Mapillary? I have started adding photos to Mapillary for RMNP

Oh that's cool. I didn't know about that one. I will try it out.

> I am in the process of trying to learn how to develop plug ins for JOSM.

That's really cool. Do you have any ideas that you're planning to add?

I would love to make plugins also, but I have so many other projects on the go, I can't really afford the time.

I was wondering if there was some opportunity to do some semi-automated mapping with machine vision algorithms powered by OpenCV. The Bing imagery is so much more readable round here - because of Colorado's less crowded cities. I've been thinking that it might be possible to do something with woodland recognition.

Also a simple flood-fill Bing imagery would be helpful for areas of a single color or texture.

>There has been endless debate on the US mailing list about this. . I don't agree with it, but the current practice seems to be to use all of the tags that you mentioned on each National Forest.

Ugh - that's pretty brain-dead. I think I would want to raise that issue again. I probably shouldn't have changed the tagging of the Roosevelt National Forest without agreement, but trying to map the area around the Cache-la-Poudre river over a giant green blob of supposed trees is nonsense.

At some point I think I'll submit a patch to the rendering rules so that boundary=protected_area shows up - even having a copy-paste of the rendering of boundary=national_park would be preferable to what we have now.
5m4u9 (2015-08-05 01:46:08+00:00): El caso de las imprentas es interesante. Se deben mapear como:

shop=copyshop + service:prepress=yes + service:press=yes porque diagraman e imprimen. 

En los cafés internet se podría poner service:print=yes si permiten impresiones de baja cantidad...
gorogoro (2015-08-11 12:23:10+00:00): ...a tomarlo en cuenta.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-19 21:15:20+00:00): Hello! Just spotted you've edited http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176772112/history recently.  I suspect that the tags on it are as a result of a previous editor "experimenting" - I added a changeset discussion to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31365796 asking about it.  If you can tag it properly ("highway=highway" is surely wrong) that would be a great help.
GerdP (2015-11-05 10:27:52+00:00): please review my changes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35098518
luiswoo (2015-08-04 08:22:58+00:00): насыпь отмечается как насыпь, а не обрыв
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:embankment
luiswoo (2015-08-04 08:37:27+00:00): статья старенькая, осмарендера уже давно нет...
кроме этого http://opentopomap.org/#map=15/47.19948/39.72781 нормально насыпи ни кто не отображает, вроде.
thermo_nuclear (2015-08-06 04:30:27+00:00): оставить или поставить embankment? Использование natural=cliff я подсмотрел здесь http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.33785/40.26127
luiswoo (2015-08-06 07:22:48+00:00): дело в том, что насыпь если верить генштабу несколько продолжительней на этом участке. не грех и тег заменить на более общеупотребительный.
В josm можно подключить WMS сервер http://91.237.82.95:8082/ там минимум пять слоев генштаба. Возможно в потлаче можно подключить подобную ссылку http://91.237.82.95:8082/?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=genshtab250m&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}  в ознакомительных целях, не  уверен
gsa (2015-09-13 09:04:43+00:00): This looks very strange.
ma-rt-in (2015-08-04 19:29:31+00:00): in deinen vielen Änderungssätzen hast du viele Fehler eingebaut.
alexsavi (2015-08-04 19:45:57+00:00): Ich würde diese sehr gerne korrigieren, bin ganz neu hier. Habe die Koordinaten von geoinfo Rlp übernommen.
ma-rt-in (2015-08-04 20:02:20+00:00): Am bsten liest du dir den hier mal durch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap

Dann nicht einfach Daten vom geoportal übernehmen. Ich sehe diese Portal eher als Hinweis, zum Beispiel für Straßen. 
Kommst du hier aus  der Gegend?
Corbax (2015-08-04 05:39:06+00:00): En reconstrucción.
rene78 (2015-08-05 22:17:07+00:00): you can find your gps verification here:
http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=MAPNIK&map=15.73/100.3112/5.3514
dpc1991 (2015-08-06 00:12:58+00:00): Thank you. I take it would be reflective of the cycle lane?
Sei Han (2015-08-04 20:21:00+00:00): Hey Mashin, thanks for alerting me to my improper edit. How could we reattach this building to Silliman College? I've been trying to figure this out...
EugenyN (2015-08-04 10:33:27+00:00): я бы в name писал "АЗС №423". т.к. распространённое сокращение. в гугле АЗС - 15 400 000,  полностью - 547 000
EugenyN (2015-08-04 10:33:59+00:00): кстати "Автозаправочная станция" - тоже сокращение :)
EugenyN (2015-08-04 10:37:16+00:00): а есть ещё агзс