piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wibr (2016-08-17 21:40:27+00:00): De wijziging betreft een voetpad tussen Asbreukerhoek en Heersenkampweg
Mocht deze uitbereiding een wijziging van een van beide wegen hebben veroorzaakt dan is dat niet de bedoeling. 
Dit is mijn eerste toevoeging/wijziging aan osm, het is natuurlijk niet de bedoeling dat de integriteit van de kaart in het geding komt!
Commodoortje (2016-08-17 21:43:16+00:00): Het was niet mijn bedoeling om een nieuwe mapper af te schrikken, nu ik mijn reactie nogmaals lees kan dit wel xo overkomen, welkom op OSM Wibr
ijsb (2016-08-17 22:18:27+00:00): wibr, je had de Heersenkampweg veranderd  van 'gewone weg' naar 'pad', maar ik nam aan dat die classificatie 'pad' bij je toevoeging hoorde. Ik ben zo brutaal geweest dat aan te passen, maar voel je vrij om verdere verbeteringen te doen.
wibr (2016-08-19 18:57:41+00:00): Prima, Heersenkampweg is 'per ongeluk' aangepast
eggie (2021-04-07 18:38:54+00:00): Dag Rik.. Nu weer edits in Nederland.. daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Tchiller (2016-09-23 11:53:52+00:00): You have constructed a circular river here. It is flowing into both directions. For river areas please take a look on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/River
Thanks.
Hjart (2016-08-14 13:42:01+00:00): This was due to a Maps.me translation error
Durko_freemap (2016-08-15 06:44:07+00:00): Zdravim Robert, to cislo 122 je cierne alebo cervene?(http://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov) a to cislo 48 nieje vobec na budove? Lebo teraz je to nespravne otagovane, na zaklade Vasej odpovede to budem vediet skorigovat (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3120468907). Vdaka za odpoved. Durko
Róbert Medviď (2016-08-16 09:35:18+00:00): Pridelené súpisné číslo domu je 122. II. dom od nás má napr. 120. Čísla na tabuľke zatiaľ nemáme.
Durko_freemap (2016-08-16 11:41:13+00:00): vdaka, adresu som upravil
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
GerdP (2017-08-23 14:10:47+00:00): Hi!
Please review:
highway=grass is not widely used, I assume you meant highway=footway + surface=grass?
Stefan de Konink (2017-08-23 16:25:13+00:00): Nope, it is a routable surface, not a footway.
GerdP (2017-08-23 16:28:31+00:00): So maybe highway=service ?
Stefan de Konink (2017-08-23 16:36:31+00:00): No, highway=grass.
GerdP (2017-08-23 16:40:13+00:00): Well, the highway tag is used to map the importance of the road, not the surface.
Why do you think that you have a special case here?
Stefan de Konink (2017-08-23 16:50:24+00:00): Because there is no road.
Stefan de Konink (2017-08-23 16:54:00+00:00): The hole purpose of having added these tags is the ability to route pedestrians over the camping place. Hence the highway tag is used on surfaces which form a graph. The highway=grass is not rendered. Don't do any harm, in the database, and should have been implicitly followed, sadly the OpenStreetMap routing suggestions do not map implicit things, thus they must be made explicit.
GerdP (2017-08-23 17:03:52+00:00): Sounds somehow crazy. A way that is not a road and should not be displayed as road should still be used like a road?
Stefan de Konink (2017-08-23 17:08:46+00:00): Exactly. The surface is a field of grass used for camping. While passing the surface in the middle moving to another campingfield is a highway activity. Don't want to render it on the map, do want to route over it.
GerdP (2017-08-23 17:11:22+00:00): What router supports this mapping?
Stefan de Konink (2017-08-23 17:14:33+00:00): OpenTripPlanner, RoutingKit, probably any router that can be configured to use tags.
GerdP (2017-08-24 07:08:56+00:00): So you tell the people who arrive at the camping to install this software and configure it just to find something like a trampoline? I can't believe that. 
Besides that I still think that the highway tag should not be used here.
SomeoneElse (2017-08-24 14:56:27+00:00): For info - "highway=grass" hasn't exactly troubled the scorers at taginfo:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=highway%3Dgrass .  It's only used in this one location.
Stefan de Konink (2017-08-24 19:50:29+00:00): I honestly don't care what you think. You are not familiair in the area, have not micromapped it, and the tagging is part of the openstreetmap database, and has not been used in rendering profiles.

I don't care about scores too. It seems you are only trying to formalize tagging, but don't come with solutions for routing in these situations.
GerdP (2017-08-25 05:16:25+00:00): A possible alternative may be highway=virtual 
It is also undocumented and not often used (64 times) but at least more self explaining,
and I think it is used for the same purpose.
Stefan de Konink (2017-08-25 12:32:24+00:00): Thanks, this is a good suggestion. I would be happy to use it.
Allroads (2018-09-20 16:36:16+00:00): In the world of cross country rally roadbook riding riding a straight line between two points, waypoints,  is HP with C, (french) Horse Piste, (englisch) Off track, (spanisch) Fuera de pista, then you riding on compass, C, CAP (french), bearing (english), rumbo (spanisch). The line should be named: off_track and have a CAP, bearing. There is no trailvisibility, when not used often, trail_visibility=no.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
7tonin (2026-05-06 10:28:44+00:00): Salut,
cette note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5237965
concerne un chemin ajouté par dessus d'autres. Je pense que tu as une image assez claire de ce lieu, et donc que tu pourrais réagir convenablement à la note.
Durko_freemap (2016-08-15 06:23:27+00:00): Zdravim Robert,
amenity=parking_space len doplna hlavny tag amenity=parking (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space), upravte to prosim Vas. Vdaka Durko.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:27:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:28:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:28:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:28:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
womped (2022-01-14 11:32:24+00:00): Hallo Nautic, das ist jetzt schon einige Zeit her, aber in diesem Änderungssatz hast du einen Node erstellt aus dem ich nicht ganz schlau werde: 

leisure=track
name=3000m Brandbach
sport=running

Kannst du dich noch erinnern, was das ist?
mavl (2019-05-03 16:28:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:28:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
rza31 (2016-11-11 17:41:32+00:00): Hallo kreuzschnabel,
für Umzugsfirmen gibt es http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Dmoving_company. Ist diese Firma am richtigen Ort?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4349825465
Jojo4u (2016-08-14 19:45:49+00:00): Hallo WKOSM, ein tunnel=culvert benötigt trotzdem noch layer=* - meist layer=-1. Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437160076 
Bitte überprüfe deine Änderungen diesbezüglich nochmal.
WKOSM (2016-08-15 10:33:58+00:00): Meine Entscheidung keinen layer=-1 zu verwenden beruht auf /wiki/Waterways; zitiere: "Where a river or stream goes under a road, railway or similar ..., or alternatively tag the watercourse with layer=-1 and tunnel=yes or tunnel=culvert ..."

Also layer=-1 nur mit tunnel=yes!

Die deutsche wiki/DE:Waterways verdreht dieses und ist meiner Meinung nach falsch. 

Mit welcher Begründung benötigt ein =culvert layer=-1?
Jojo4u (2016-08-15 19:16:10+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine Antwort. Auch ein tunnel=culvert muss auf wie jedes Feature korrekt mit layer=* getaggt sein wenn darüber ein anderes Feature (z.B. ein Weg) führt. Keep Right bemängelt genau dies gleich nebenan: http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=78042023

Wie du auf der deutschen und englischen Wikiseite von tunnel=culvert sehen kannst wird dort kein layer=* impliziert. Außerdem steht dort "Use the tag layer=* as usual for tunnels." Auch bei der Wikiseite von tunnel=* steht "most tunnels should be tagged with layer=-1 or another suitable negative value (exception: tunnel=building_passage)."

Bei taginfo steht zu tunnel=culvert dass zu 83% ein layer=* dazu steht (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=culvert#combinations)

Ich habe die Wikiseite etwas umformuliert so dass es nicht mehr so ambivalent interpretiert werden kann.

LG Joachim
WKOSM (2016-08-16 08:23:25+00:00): Gehen wir einen Schritt zurück und betrachten nur layer=*

Wer braucht den tag:layer?
Welchen Nutzen bringt der tag:layer?
Jojo4u (2016-08-16 18:32:09+00:00): Oh ich weiß nicht ob ich das in dieser Länge diskutieren möchte. Auf der Wikiseite zu layer steht einiges dazu und wer mehr darüber diskutieren möchte kann dies im deutschen Forum oder auf der Mailing Liste tun. Layer wird immer verwendet wenn zwei Features sich überlappen, insbesondere auch bei tunnel=* und bridge=*

LG Joachim
seav (2017-03-19 08:05:23+00:00): Hi! What is this under-construction bridge? Are there any news reports for this?
mavl (2019-05-03 16:28:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-03 16:28:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:25:10+00:00): This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:25:16+00:00): This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:24:53+00:00): This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:24:59+00:00): This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:24:42+00:00): This is a MAPS.ME personal marker. Likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
Colin Smale (2016-08-14 22:12:48+00:00): What is the intention with "ref:hectares"? Firstly, it has nothing to do with a "ref" in the traditional sense and a tag such as "landarea=*" might be a better fit. Secondly there is no need to record the area in OSM as it can be calculated from the geometry.
alexkemp (2016-08-14 22:16:22+00:00): This is an automated response: sorry, but I'm too busy mapping too be able to spare the time to respond to you. Thank you for your interest in my mapping. -Alex Kemp
Lightsider (2016-09-21 10:17:01+00:00): - Where does the information about the village nodes in SW Burkina Faso (e.g. node # 3841367490) come from? 
- Are you sure they are villages (and not hamlets) 
- What do you mean by the "capital" and "admin_level" keys?
Verdy_p (2016-09-21 11:03:31+00:00): All populations come from the 2012 general population survey, finalized and officialized for the municipal elections that toook place after that.
There's a complete PDF listing all communes/departments and their member "villages" (official term) or "secteurs" (only in capitals of departments/communes and a few other towns which had more than 10 000 inhabitants when they were officially subdivided, a few ones are still subdivided even if their population have decreased) with their finalized population: A "secteur" may belong to only one town or city (and also in a single arrondissement, in the two special cities of Bobo Dioulasso, and Ouagadougou).

The electoral file is the most up to date source of population (as opposed to the older file published in 2012 by INSD which contained **preliminary** results, the electoral file is finalized and has been officialized).

For now there's not been any newer figures published.

capital=* indicate the minimum level at which a place is the capital of an admin boundary. This is documented.

admin_level=* is used to distinguish villages from departments/municipalities. Note that a "city" or town is not always an administrative unit and not at admin_level 8 by itself when it is subdivieded into "secteurs".

Look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Burkina_Faso/subdivisions

and its separate subpage for municipalities (all of them are départements, they are also communes but there are 3 kinds of communes; and there's a single commune by department, with the same name, but whose territorial compentence is limited to only the urbanized areas with permanent residents, but does not cover the rural parts of the department with transitory populations, as this space is managed by the national state represented locally in the département):

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Burkina_Faso/communes
Verdy_p (2016-09-21 11:18:55+00:00): Note: There's been recently an update for the municipal elections in May 2016, but for now it's not integrated. I'll need to check where there are changes since 2012:

- Arrêté n°2013-0021/MATS/SG/DGAT/DOAT du 08 mai 2013 ;
- Arrêté n°2013-0022/MATS/SG/DGAT/DOAT du 08 mai 2013 ;
- Arrêté n°2013-000051/MATS/SG/DGAT/DOAT du 09octobre 2013 ;
- Arrêté n°2013-000055/MATS/SG/DGAT/DOGCA du 22 octobre 2013 ;
- Arrêté n°2013-0048/MATS/MIDT du 19 août 2013 ;
- Arrêté n°2014-0007/MATS/SG/DGAT/DOGCA du 07 février 2014 ;
-Arrêté n°2014-0009/MATS/SG/DGAT/DOGCA du 27 février 2014 ;
- Arrêté n°2014-0016/MATS/SG/DGAT/DOGCA du 25 avril 2014 ;
- Arrêté n°2014-0035/MATS/SG/DGAT/DOGCA du 01 septembre 2014 ;
- Arrêté n°2015-0028/MATDS/SG/DGAT/DOGCA du 27mars 2015 ;
- Arrêté n°2015-00130/MATDS/SG/DGAT/DOGCA du 21 juillet 2015.
- Arrêté n°2015-00139/MATDS/SG/DGAT/DOAT du 22 juillet 2015.
Verdy_p (2016-09-21 14:20:25+00:00): Final note: the list of communes is not fully dimilted by borders.
There are no open geographic data available at this time for their limits except descriptions: it is important to geolocate all villages listed in these documents in order to estimate boundaries (the list of villages allows recognizing some natural borders for departements, but note that these borders are still not the borders of municipalities that are smaller.
These borders however should be helpful to help geolocalize many things. But will still need to be imporved over time. Their precision is not decimetric like in Europe, but within about 500 meters in rural areas. We'll see later if a cadastre is implemented and published ut it will mostly concern first the urban areas of communes and for now the best open geographic sources are aerial imageries, where we can locate roads and rivers and most tracks, but not within forests (but there's not a lot of dense forest in Burkina, except in the East, and they are almost not cut by any administrative borders, most often defined along rivers).
martinst (2022-02-21 08:41:40+00:00): Bitte bei name=* nur Eigennamen eintragen, Sitzbank ist keiner.
Владимир К (2016-08-17 14:05:37+00:00): вы если номера полностью расставили, то линии интерполяций надо бы убрать :)
Commodoortje (2016-08-16 07:50:52+00:00): Het is niet de bedoeling om een huis de naam van de straat te geven.
Ik heb vanuit de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) de contouren herplaatst
SomeoneElse (2016-08-14 21:17:33+00:00): Just for info, I reverted the node drags in the previous changeset here but left https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434932382 as you left it.
I think it's all OK now, but it would do no harm for you to check :)
user_870861 (2016-08-16 21:17:02+00:00): bonjour,
petit signalement de way exactement dupliques (voir mon blocage)
http://dev.osmose.frontend.dirif.info/fr/map/#zoom=17&lat=49.0632430&lon=2.1850794&item=1230&level=1
imagico (2016-08-15 07:51:47+00:00): Hello NolwennC,

Google Earth data may not be used as a source for mapping in OSM, please revert your edits based on that and in the future use only allowed sources - JOSM will offer you several well usable options for this area.
NolwennC (2016-08-15 10:49:27+00:00): Hi imagico,
Sorry for that.
I thought that using GE image and doing my-self some extraction of information from those will not fall under their copywrite issue. 

However, being new to OSM I am not sure how to edit just my previous changes. Any suggestions ?
Thanks in advance,
imagico (2016-08-15 11:01:00+00:00): There is a reverter plugin in JOSM that allows you to revert your changesets:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

If the different changes modify the same features you need to make sure you revert them in reverse order, the latest one first.  If you are unsure how to do this you can contact the data working group who are experienced with reverting larger edits:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
NolwennC (2016-08-15 11:09:22+00:00): Thanks, I will have a look at it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-08-26 15:13:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41714811 where the changeset comment is: revert Google Earth sourced data in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41449985
mavl (2019-05-03 16:28:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Commodoortje (2016-08-16 07:19:24+00:00): Volgens BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) zijn de door u de aangepaste adresgegevens onjuist.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=7414AG&objectId=0150100000021079&geometry.x=206675.77968125&geometry.y=476415.45016549&zoomlevel=14&detailsObjectId=
dvdhoven (2016-08-17 13:12:24+00:00): Changeset gereverted. Nummers zijn nog steeds aanwezig
mavl (2019-05-03 16:28:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
EneaSuper (2016-08-15 10:24:06+00:00): C'è un campo sportivo sul tetto dell'istituto, è mappabile?
bubix (2016-08-16 08:00:37+00:00): il carcere o la scuola?
EneaSuper (2016-08-16 10:22:28+00:00): Nella scuola, quello carcerario l'ho appena controllato e risulta come carpenteria, è certamente un errore! O.o
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
Math1985 (2016-08-14 19:01:02+00:00): Hartelijk dank hiervoor!
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:44:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:45:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:45:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:45:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 06:34:04+00:00): Hello!

What you meant by shop=company in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4350073799/history ?

Have you meant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dcompany ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-14 09:29:53+00:00): Thanks for the fix!

Should the same be done for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4350073086 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4350073065/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4350073062 ?

Or are these a different case?
mavl (2019-05-09 10:45:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:45:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933
mavl (2019-05-09 10:45:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.  
Reason: «Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud» is an incompatible copyrighted source.  
  
Please, see:  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60664933