piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RicoElectrico (2021-11-23 11:02:21+00:00): Hej, czy Żabka zajmuje cały budynek?
Cascafico (2021-11-24 09:18:19+00:00): Ciao,. Per capire la situazione: l'edificio non è più una scuola (visto che ci sono ristorante e panificio), ma permane il nome "Scuola elementare", giusto?
Cascafico (2021-11-24 09:20:27+00:00): Correggo.. non avevo visto l'ultima versione dove hai rimosso amenity e name. Scusa.
gion274 (2021-11-24 16:03:55+00:00): figurati!...nessun problema. Ciao
Larmax (2021-11-23 13:16:27+00:00): Hi, those areas are marked with living street signs on the ground, not pedestrian area ones
laflovver (2021-11-23 13:23:29+00:00): Hello Larmax.
I have not deleted roads with highway = living_street tag.
but I decided to mark the territory as highway = pedestrian because this road can be mapped by a polygon and shows that there is a priority for pedestrians. but if I'm wrong, then I will return everything to its place of course.
Larmax (2021-11-23 13:31:30+00:00): On itäinen rantakatu I guess that makes sense since there's hardly any cars on it and they are banned for most part, but on the area surrounding the church there are a lot more cars and you can even park along the edges of it
laflovver (2021-11-23 13:43:24+00:00): yes, I see parking spaces around the church. What do you think is better to return highway = living_street or add parking spaces?
Larmax (2021-11-23 13:50:00+00:00): I'd say it should be tagged as highway=living_street anyway since highway=pedestrian should only be used on roads/areas where driving isn't allowed or is strictly limited.
laflovver (2021-11-23 13:55:41+00:00): ok then i revert the changeset. 
Thanks for paying attention to this.
laflovver (2021-11-23 14:10:41+00:00): I got the idea to use the place = square tag there. but it's too late))
DressyPear4 (2021-11-22 20:22:22+00:00): Olá, essas vias existem ou são apenas planejadas?
Não há traços gps que indicam que no local tem vias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114103277
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:39:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
trigpoint (2021-11-22 17:48:58+00:00): Just wondering why you have joined the boundary of the business park to the centreline of the restricted byway, which is outside the fence?

Cheers Phil
Robert Whittaker (2022-01-21 09:58:35+00:00): In this changeset you seem to have edited https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1281726035/ to change the brand tags from Budgens to Co-Op, but have left the name as Budgens. Can you confirm if the store has changed to a Co-Op, or are there perhaps two different stores in that building?

(It's not a suitable source for OSM, but I see that both chains list a branch at 24 University Way on their websites: https://www.budgens.co.uk/our-stores/wharley-end and https://stores.welcome-stores.co.uk/bedfordshire/bedford/24-university-way.html .)
Antimuonium (2022-01-21 10:46:36+00:00): Budgens has been replaced by Co-op last September or October. The post office is located in Co-op. Sorry, I forgot to change the name as well. This should be done now but feel free to edit the element as well since I am not very familiar with OSM yet.
martinst (2021-11-22 18:16:33+00:00): Bitte keine Wege in OSM löschen die physisch vorhanden sind und korrekt ausgezeichnet waren.
martinst (2022-01-13 22:20:32+00:00): Wiederhergestellt in Changeset: 116126912
Frans S (2021-11-23 10:07:31+00:00): Hallo Johan. Bedankt voor het mappen op dit project.
Ik zie dat je paths gewijzigd heb in Tracks.
Het is altijd lastig de juiste tag te gebruiken. Kijk daarom ook naar de staat en de breedte van de trace.
Als je de definities bekijkt in de WIKI african highways  zie je dat de tag track hoofdzakelijk bedoeld is voor toegangswegen/paden naar landbouwgebieden 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Korte toegangswegen afleidend naar dichtbij gelegen woningen die goed zichtbaar zijn van een weg hoeven niet gemapt te worden.
Ook is het de bedoeling paden en wegen waar mogelijk, aan elkaar te koppelen om zo een netwerk te vormen.
in IDeditor kun je de breedte van een weg bepalen ( handig om onderscheid te maken tussen een pad en een weg door deze toetsencombinatie te gebruiken:

Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.
Vriendelijke groeten
Frans
Nearby0051 (2021-11-26 15:28:21+00:00): Looks good :)
Thanks for your edit

I have modified the phone number to a more standardized value and simplified the opening hours 

Congrats on making your first edit!
Have fun mapping
mapperue (2023-09-05 06:34:51+00:00): Do tagov sa nevpisujú rôzne vymyslené hodnoty ako tu flag:type="štátna_zástava". Všetky dostupné hodnoty sú popísané na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dflagpole.
Ak sa jedná o štátnu vlajku, tak sa používa tag flag:type=national.
julcnx (2026-06-16 04:03:28+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
rarad74 (2021-11-28 20:50:14+00:00): Hi. Please pay atention around Satu Mare if you can , because some user deleted all clc data around the town and it seems no one has noticed so far. Thanks. I reverted the edit.
ArleneC (2021-11-29 16:55:26+00:00): Thank you for the information about this area. I appreciate it.
vulasala (2021-11-23 06:35:55+00:00): Hi Ranti Sophia,
Trust you are doing well. I have fixed the validation errors.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114105753
aceman444 (2022-02-13 13:37:59+00:00): Fúra je lokalna firma, co vysypava smeti z kontajnerov?
simon-rada (2022-02-13 13:53:36+00:00): v podstate áno
ottwiz (2021-11-24 21:53:20+00:00): Igazából jónak tűnik, jól ismerem szerencsére a környéket, de mintha nekem úgy rémlene hogy a Rózsa utca és a Görgey által határol parkocska az magánterület lenne, le van kerítésezve, legalábbis mikor 2020-ban az UMSZKI-ba jártam még a covid előtt, így tapasztaltam. Persze azóta lehet, hogy a kerítést felszámolták.
ottwiz (2021-11-24 22:03:44+00:00): Ja bocs nem :D csak a járdákat berajzoltad, de a kerítést majd én berajzolom mert ugyanis egy része a parknak az a társasház része
HVGY (2021-11-27 13:25:46+00:00): Szia! Igen, van ott egy kerítés. Amit átvezettem rajta valójában nem azt célozta. Eddig a SPAR (szemből nézve) jobb oldalán volt egy utca, kihajtó. Az elmúlt bő fél évben felújítótták a Rózsa utcát és a kihajtást áthelyezték a bal oldalra, a korábban ott lévő parkolót átvágták a füves részen és így kereszteződés lett ott. A jobb oldalon ugyan ezt visszafelé, azaz megszűnt a kihajtás és füvesítettek. Ennek értelmét én annyiban látom, hogy így távolabb került a kihajtó egy ottani zebrától és lámpás kereszteződéstől, korábban ugyanis szinte lehetetlen volt balra kihajtani, de legalábbis nagyon körülményes volt. Az átalakítással "hagyományos" kanyarodási feltételek teremtődtek balra is. A szerkesztegetések, beleértve a zöldfelület átalakítást is ennek az áthelyezésnek a következménye.
ottwiz (2021-11-27 13:30:05+00:00): Á, most már értem. Köszi, amúgy pont azért néztem ezt meg mert ott volt a review_requested=yes a changesetben és akkor már így rálestem. Erre mondjuk pont nem emlékeztem hogy ott az autósoknak szívás volt a kijövetel, a SPAR-ba ugyanis nem mentem soha, hanem az OBI melletti SPAR-ba mentem amikor kellett menni
HVGY (2021-11-27 13:36:31+00:00): Nincs mit. A kihajtás régen gyakorlatilag a pirosnál álló első autó oldalával volt kb. egy vonalban, szóval egyszerre kellett figyelni a zebrát, a jelzőlámpát és persze a vagányokat jobbról és balról... nem lehetetlen, de biztosan sokan nem szerették és egy jó közlekedésmérnök is könnyen felismerhette a kockázatokat. A streetview-n most még érzékelhető. Lehet, az újdonságokról  legközelebb egy fotót is teszek fel valahova, úgy még szemléletesebb lenne...utána olvasok, mi a szokás fotódokumentációs "survey" ügyben itt az osm-en.
orthocircular (2022-08-29 18:41:47+00:00): Hi Tkbonesdir! I'm looking at helping map this area, and I'm wondering about way #665523513, the newly built section to the south. It's a residential area labeled as "The Villages, Florida" however the city of "The Villages" (relation #1240329) seems to be a much larger border that cuts halfway through this area. Do you know if the boundaries or names for these areas has changed?
Allison P (2022-08-29 19:34:45+00:00): Also, not all features need a name. "Foot Path" is just a description of the feature. The name should just be left blank.
orthocircular (2022-09-11 05:36:47+00:00): Tkbonesdir, way #817955240 and its new connected way #1093503220 are marked as golf cart = no however I wonder if they should be?
Tkbonesdir (2022-09-11 22:08:25+00:00): Hey, orthocircular, I sent you a message. I'm almost positive that is Foot Path only. If you zoom in on that section on Bing, you will see that there are sections for Bikes and Golf Carts on the actual road 28.821691, -82.024206
user_2066394 (2021-11-23 01:03:14+00:00): Ist das ein separater Gebäudeteil, der sich vom Rest des Gebäudes unterscheidet (z. B. Anzahl Stockwerke oder Dachform) bzw. einen eigenen Zugang hat?
PaB Solutions Inh Martin Kropp (2021-11-23 09:14:58+00:00): Dies ist ein separater Gebäudeteil mit einem eigenen Eingang.
Die Stockwerkzahl und die Dachform ist Identisch da es sich um ein Gebäude handelt. Der Zugang zu den angegebenen Flächen befindet sich rechts hinter dem Briefkasten von der Straße aus gesehen.
stigar (2021-11-22 16:50:24+00:00): Bugg i Go Map!! verkar göra att gamla CS-kommentarer dyker upp.

Korrekt text här: Trappa.
trigpoint (2021-11-22 17:39:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004645242 can hardly be described as farmland, scrub going back to nature is the best definition I can come up with since I walk it regularly. 

Cheers Phil
miche101 (2021-11-23 10:17:07+00:00): Hi,

mit der Änderung ist so einiges kaputt gegangen. Ich hab auch nicht verstanden was du da genau versucht hast einzutragen. Hab mich dazu entschlossen die Änderung rückgängig zu machen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114133263

Gruß Miche
adiatmad (2021-11-23 01:47:47+00:00): Halo Ribly Assidiqi, selamat datang di OSM.
Apakah bangunan yang Anda modif itu semuanya retail?
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abuilding%3Dretail)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114106140
SHARCRASH (2021-11-22 16:55:38+00:00): + corrected route relations according new elements
abakus_uploader (2021-11-22 23:32:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2021-11-22 23:32:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
vulasala (2021-11-23 06:17:35+00:00): Hi PTLT,
Trust you are doing well. I have fixed the validation errors.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114106748
Frans S (2022-04-06 13:05:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Pleas tag highways not as Footway, use the tag Path. Also connect paths/roads to each other where traces show they should continue.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114107833
Tomas_J (2023-07-01 13:28:51+00:00): Ahoj, sem (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1834739713) si doplnal wikidata tag. Preco si nedoplnil aj wikipedia tag? Pytam sa preto, ze ich teraz doplnam, tak aby som neurobil nieco nespravne... Dik.
vojtechzaboril (2023-07-02 09:36:05+00:00): Ahoj, Wikipedii jsem neřešil, pro můj účel stačila WD, klidně doplň.
elsy1 (2021-11-23 16:46:56+00:00): سلام، منبع شما برای تغییر نام این خیابان ها چیست؟ در نقشه شهرداری هیچ کدام از این اسم ها وجود ندارد!
kapazao (2024-05-06 11:09:59+00:00): Hola, por favor comprueba bien el etiquetado de los elementos y revisa imágenes a pie de calle siempre que sea posible para evitar añadir embalses ficticios como estos.
Se han corregido a zonas de matorral.
Un saludo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-29 01:50:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114341892 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping in Scotland and Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5480 .
ivanbranco (2021-12-01 10:02:43+00:00): Hi Jaredphi,

why you merged a place with a highway=traffic_signals? I don't think is a good idea.

Also you put two values in the place tag place=town;county. Is this a town or a county?
ivanbranco (2021-12-01 10:03:37+00:00): I'm talking about this: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/362410231/history

(here the previous node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6645014258/history )
Enock4seth (2021-11-24 20:47:18+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for helping to map. Kindly pause any changes for the time being as your recent changes especially starting from this one have damaged a lot of stuffs already.
Enock4seth (2021-11-24 20:48:06+00:00): For getting started, LearnOSM https://learnosm.org/en/ is a good resource for learning how to map. Please take a look
elvisplatini (2021-11-23 09:50:45+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai testé ce matin la passerelle que je voulais supprimer : elle existe bel et bien °~°. Bien cachée, et pas du tout indiquée (ceci n'excuse pas mon erreur, bien sûr). 
Pourriez-vous, s'il vous plaît, annuler ma suppression (je n'ai pas utiliser JOSM et son plugin d'annulation, j'ai effectué directement la modification sur le site). Là aussi, je vais apprendre.
wkdgs (2021-11-23 14:40:35+00:00): Hi,

zunächst einmal Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Der "name"-Tag ist eigentlich nur für Eigennamen gedacht, nicht für Beschreibung.

Das Einweihungsdatum könntest du z.B. über den Tag "start_date" angeben (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:start_date).

Die Beschreibung "Kriegerehrendmal" könntest du in einen ""description"-Tag packen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description). Falls das aber tatsächlich der Eigenname ist oder es so genannt wird, kannst du das auch im "name"-Tag lassen.

Gruß
winkeldings
wkdgs (2021-11-23 14:36:59+00:00): Hi,

kannst du auch direkt den "lit=yes"-Tag an den durchgehend beleuchteten Straßen hinzufügen? Dann ist das direkt miterledigt.

Gruß
winkeldings
HB2016 (2021-11-23 15:46:03+00:00): N'abend,

ist erledigt! :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:43:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Dave Venables (2021-11-22 21:54:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368490546 already mapped
abakus_uploader (2021-11-22 23:32:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kawino85 (2021-11-22 19:39:08+00:00): Please leave a note at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101390024 to avoid even more wrong mapping in future.
ivanbranco (2022-01-08 20:33:40+00:00): Hi Geoloiko,

there's a tag already for wash houses: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dlavoir
PolyDunami (2021-11-22 19:37:48+00:00): w5256150 was called Abbott Road. Whatcom County's Parcel Viewer titled it Powell Place.

w5262136 is Gulf View Crescent, and Aerial Imagery suggests that there's no continuance between Broughton Lane and Powell Place. Currently, I've named w1005387935 as Gulf View Crescent as well, though it may just be part of Powell Place.

w5257814 and w1005387938 seem to share the same road name of Walters Lane.
PolyDunami (2021-11-22 21:28:25+00:00): As for w636594798, this building just across the border was drawn over distorted imagery and had to be corrected.
Luzandro (2021-11-23 12:45:12+00:00): Hi,

your new tracks overlap with ways that have existed for years: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005389409/#map=18/47.83620/16.02500
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114111972
PacerCZ (2021-11-24 09:08:55+00:00): Hi, you are absolutely right. Unfortunately, my editor had showed no continuation of the track and therefore I did it. I am going to repair the problem.
Luzandro (2021-11-25 11:38:07+00:00): thx. As for your clearcut areas: the wiki says, "If there is vegetation present, add a suitable tag such as natural=scrub for bushes, shrubs and very small trees (transitional scrub) or landuse=meadow for grasses and herbs (transitional meadow)." At first I wasn't totally sure, what to think about this myself, but in the end I think it's a reasonable suggestion, as "clearcut" doesn't really tell enough about the current condition.
PacerCZ (2021-11-25 20:32:16+00:00): Thx for the remark. I have allways had the same problems with clearcuts. The fact is, that principially is for me some clearcut anyway something other as bushes or meadow. Ussually is there at first the real clearcut, later grass and then bushes. And the whole time may be there the symbol for clearcut, otherwise should we that follow and soon change. I do not know what the best solution is.
Mashin (2021-11-24 20:57:40+00:00): though some of the service roads look more like service=parking_aisle
cserpell (2022-01-13 01:06:39+00:00): Please be more careful, you deleted a main road in the city.
xronos (2021-12-24 16:14:06+00:00): А почему удалили name со входов в метро?
mini-me (2021-12-24 16:33:54+00:00): Там должно быть название выхода, а не станции https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dsubway_entrance#How_to_map
xronos (2021-12-24 16:44:24+00:00): понял. Однако. На мапник этот public_transport=stop_area релейшн обрабатывает неправильно. И как следствие станцию рисует сильно не в том месте, где она в городе расположена :(

Попробую что-нить конструктивное сделать со своим рендером
user_5108541 (2021-12-27 10:10:55+00:00): Зачем Вы вернули автобус №1 на Строителей?
literan (2021-12-28 11:00:42+00:00): вы серьезно накосячили в этой правке, случайно утащили объекты https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114095618

пришлось отменить вашу правку.
автобус тогда поправлю чуть попозже
literan (2021-12-29 20:40:09+00:00): исправил
Enock4seth (2021-11-24 20:49:19+00:00): Only 's' as a changeset comment is bad, and doesn't say anything about what changes you have made. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Enock4seth (2021-11-24 20:50:11+00:00): Space character as a changeset comment is bad, and doesn't say anything about what changes you have made. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Nighto (2021-11-29 12:35:20+00:00): Olá DressyPear4, qual a fonte para o nome da subestação? Não consegui achar em outra fonte. Obrigado.
DressyPear4 (2021-11-29 13:30:53+00:00): Usei a nota que tinha ali
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2349781
Nighto (2021-11-29 13:41:53+00:00): Vendo imagens do Street View (não para copiar um eventual nome, mas para verificar a existência de placas) não consegui ver nada, assim como não encontrei nenhuma referência online. Acredito que a nota possa ter sido vandalismo (já que o nome em questão é de um youtuber que gera alguma polêmica), mas pode ser só um falso positivo mesmo.
Geaquinto (2021-12-01 01:12:32+00:00): Conjunto de alteração revertido
TheSwavu (2021-11-29 09:43:11+00:00): Hi,

Something has gone wrong here. You've put a railway in the middle of the Coral Sea.
sjk23 (2021-12-13 20:05:38+00:00): ahaha sorry, not really sure what happened here!
batyrmastyr (2021-12-09 10:39:53+00:00): Кажется вы в этом исправлении растянули территорию города Дзержинск до размеров одноимённого городского округа, хотя сам населённый пункт далеко не настолько большой. Вот, например, один из выездов из него: https://yandex.ru/maps/972/dzerzhinsk/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=43.509644%2C56.241704&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=71.529355%2C0.000000&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=43.507871%2C56.241710&panorama%5Bspan%5D=113.813244%2C60.000000&z=17
Felis Pimeja (2021-12-09 22:14:27+00:00): Ага. Граница населённого пункта устанавливается не въездными знаками, а генеральным планом. А по действующему генплану граница города почти повторяет границы городского округа.
Felis Pimeja (2021-12-09 22:15:28+00:00): Но кажется я забыл загрузить вторую часть чейнджсета, где вырезал границы деревень в составе ГО. Буду исправлять ))
Felis Pimeja (2021-12-10 01:42:43+00:00): Внёс правки. Закончил с границами:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114765156
Mashin (2021-11-24 20:53:16+00:00): Hi,
just a question. Is this a new extension of the trail?
The original trail terminates south from there:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3776993


And that is what CFPA website still shows 
https://www.ctwoodlands.org/blue-blazed-hiking-trails/blue-blazed-hiking-trails-interactive-map
mcccxxv (2021-11-24 22:17:38+00:00): Yes, it seems like it. I was surprised by the same. I was just there on 13 November 2021, kept following the clear blue blazes, all looked very new, nice path.
Mashin (2021-11-25 03:09:55+00:00): Awesome, more things to map!
I added your stretch to the exiting relation.