piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
canfe (2024-01-28 07:33:00+00:00): Non mettere il civico associato al building.
... e magari rispondi.
Tomas Straupis (2020-06-11 06:42:09+00:00): Hello. Please do not follow advices of iD to change "deprecated" tags. Those incorrect advices are made by incompetent and authoritarian Bryan, not by OpenStreetMap community. I will revert the changes.
user_2066394 (2020-06-10 21:50:57+00:00): öffnungszeiten bräuchten noch das richtige format
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
BeKri (2020-06-11 11:37:14+00:00): noch falscher ;-))
"Do" ist deutsch hier ganz falsch
Bei Fr fehlt der Strich dazwischen
canfe (2020-06-14 07:27:07+00:00): La Pizzeria Corso Italia ha gli orari in un formato non corretto.
Consiglio di usare questo sito per ottenere la stringa corretta
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
mueschel (2020-06-11 07:54:09+00:00): Something went wrong with this import.

a) all the 9000 nodes got a "building" tag
b) all the ways have a huge amount of foreign tags that shouldn't appear in OSM
c) Your source suggests that this is an import of data - please read and follow the Import Guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mueschel (2020-06-13 09:40:07+00:00): I reverted this changeset for now. I tried to fix all the errors, but JOSM reported more than 5000 - just too many to get this solved in any reasonable amount of time.
abrensch (2020-06-15 13:03:21+00:00): Hallo user_6330,

sieht aus, als braucht diese Kreuzung nochmal bisschen Pflege:

Dieser Node hängt jetzt an so einem "Zipfel" der Badstrasse:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2638017971

Und diese Abbiegerelation scheint verunglückt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11191794

(Es gibt ohnehin kaum Abbiegerelationen mit "via" Way und keine Router, die sie auswerten, aber diese hier scheint auch sinnlos)

Schaust Du nochmal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
user_6330 (2020-06-15 14:12:45+00:00): Hallo Arndt,
- die Stelle der Node sollte jetzt passen.
- die Abbiegerelation ist tatsächlich so, wer von Osten her die "Abkürzung" über die Kapuzinerstr. (Bushaltestelle) nimmt, MUSS anschließend rechts in die Obere Marktstr. abbiegen.
Grüße, Mark
abakus_uploader (2020-06-11 22:38:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Nobiwichu (2020-06-10 22:15:17+00:00): Der JOSM-Validator zeigt eine Warnung: "leisure innerhalb von leisure". Es bezieht sich auf das Fußballfeld im Süd-Westen des Bereichs. Auf diesem Fußballfeld stehen zusätzlich zwei Basketball-Körbe. Sollte dies anders getagged werden?
A67-A67 (2020-06-10 22:21:31+00:00): Hier wordt deze wijziging teruggedraaid: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86155801.
A67-A67 (2020-06-10 22:22:02+00:00): Ik zal nu dubbel ingetekende zaken oplossen.
Frans S (2020-06-17 17:11:19+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here 
Please review your knowledge how to map and tag highways
You tagged a road which leads to farms as a tertiary highway. This tag is to be used for roads connecting villages with towns and have a through going function.
Here the tag unclassified was more suitable.
In the rural areas like here tagging residential roads is also not good.
See this document about tagging of highways.  
It says for Africa, but here you can use the same taggings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

Best regards and keep mapping
ma-rt-in (2020-06-11 09:16:14+00:00): Hallo,
die Wasserfläche benötigt hier keinen Name, das ist unüblich da bereits ein waterway=river dort liegt.
vg
tanonin (2021-10-19 15:57:29+00:00): /way/343462965
Smoothness excellent?
user_1566574 (2021-10-19 16:03:43+00:00): Ça l'a bien été à un moment... :')

J'ai ajouté ça sur beaucoup de chemins, si c'était à faire je ne le referais pas. J'ai arrêté de l'ajouter il y a quelques mois. Mea culpa.
rskedgell (2020-06-11 10:15:49+00:00): Please don't delete features which other users have mapped, tag them with service=driveway + access=private (or access=customers) instead, which will prevent routers from sending the public along those routes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
bubipz (2020-06-10 23:20:24+00:00): Faza I*
Laatikko22 (2020-06-12 16:17:27+00:00): Thank you.
user_5359 (2020-12-12 18:02:33+00:00): Hello! You are the original author of the tag golf="hole 9" see discussion in https://www.osm.org/changeset/86486643: Same question to you: Did you mean name="Golf 9"? Or is this a possible mistake?
user_5359 (2020-12-12 17:50:00+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/802256628/history: You add In version 4 to the tag "leisure" = "golf_course the tag "golf" = "hole 9". Did you mean name="Golf 9"? Or is this a possible mistake?
maraf24 (2020-12-12 17:57:24+00:00): I copied tags from this line: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814776187/history
Supaplex (2020-06-11 03:26:49+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86486670
Frans S (2020-06-11 10:18:14+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here 
I've send you a PM about mapping in genereal
You map also buildings in which you include the white spot, which is apparently the visible sidewall of a building which don't have to be included in the mapping as well as the dark shadow line next to a building
most rectangular buildings are strict rectangular, so 4 ,6 or 8 nodes are sufficient.
Don't forget to square each rectangular building with the Q key
Best regards and keep mapping
Glassman (2020-06-11 05:34:23+00:00): Instead of private for bicycle, foot, and horse I think you want no. Access private basically tells cars and trucks that this is a private road. The no tells pedestrians, cyclists, etc. that they are not welcome.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86487361
user_8334278 (2020-06-11 00:45:11+00:00): made correction to my new polygon driving range, road is not part of golf coarse this is a gas field road is there to service gas wells.
user_8334278 (2020-06-11 11:48:27+00:00): this is not flat it is a big mouton !
!bm (2020-06-11 12:45:16+00:00): Hallo ueberbewertet, zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

Ich habe deinen Eintrag überarbeitet in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86518437

--besteGrüße!bm
Remesse (2020-12-12 16:22:36+00:00): As a Wikidata object should always only be linked with a single OSM entity please don't add the same Wikidata ID to every "Muddy River" way, but rather create a relation.
user_8334278 (2020-06-11 01:37:14+00:00): edit based on site visit and trace.
Frans S (2020-06-18 12:01:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
A request.
Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas
Best regards
user_8334278 (2020-06-11 02:54:53+00:00): edit based on visit to site and trace and street-level image.
user_8334278 (2020-06-11 15:31:53+00:00): based on my on the ground trace, not bing
Frans S (2020-06-19 10:53:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please pay attention to the errors/warnings which show up on the issue triangle of the right hand menu.
Solve these issues if possible  before uploading your work

Here you connected the nodes of the roads to nodes of buildings. 
Never connect nodes of buildings to nodes of other features. like highways
Let highways never cross buildings as well. 
Navigation systems cannot handle these situations

Best regards and keep mapping
user_8334278 (2020-06-11 03:21:51+00:00): edit based on trace and walk.
bikingaround244 (2022-09-03 00:34:12+00:00): in this change set you added bicycles=no to Lansdowne St (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8648014/history#map=19/42.34738/-71.09775&layers=G) I have biked on this street plenty of times along with a lot of other people. There is no signs indicating that bikes are not allowed or anything. I am changing it bikes=yes.
Allison P (2022-09-03 03:11:34+00:00): If there are no signs at all, I don't think there should be any tag.
bikingaround244 (2022-09-03 03:36:45+00:00): that's cool with me just don't add bicycle=no please
user_5359 (2020-06-11 08:25:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.
trigpoint (2020-06-11 09:24:06+00:00): Hi, your mapping is a bit ambiguous here as you have placed the bollard on the connecting node between the road and cycleway.

Does the bollard prevent motor vehicles from accessing Wall Close or the cycleway. 

Do cyclists need to avoid the bollard?

Cheers Phil
jaravn (2020-06-14 02:35:05+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits, apologies , I have changed the unmarked crossing into bollard. we do not have enough resources to modify the cycle path. Reverting the changes and adding the bollard as per the available resources. Going forward, I will make sure, my edits will be in complete alignment with the ground data. thanks for the quick suggestion. always happy to learn from the community
Frans S (2020-06-17 12:09:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
I've send you a PM with more information
Best regards
user_5359 (2020-06-11 13:09:29+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
产权=用户
型号=S11
类型=柱变
维护单位=茄子河供电所
编号=富贵分北2支#05变台
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
Benjamin Muller (2020-06-14 20:31:31+00:00): The convention in MA has been to include the waterways within the municipal boundaries (see neighboring communities). I believe the MassGIS layer is just for aesthetic use?
ZeLonewolf (2020-06-14 22:07:57+00:00): Hi,
I've been using the GIS data (dated Sep 2019) at: https://docs.digital.mass.gov/dataset/massgis-data-community-boundaries-towns-survey-points

It states "This layer is the most accurate representation of Massachusetts' municipal (city and town) boundaries; this representation is based on the legislatively approved record of municipal boundaries."

Is there a different data source I should be using instead?
Rassilon (2020-06-14 22:31:15+00:00): I just finished updating all the admin boundaries in the state to conform to the 2019-09 MassGIS boundary lines a couple weeks ago. But yes, for boundaries that go over water we use a different data set. You can see those lines on the USGS Topo map. The wiki recommended setting up a separate boundary relation using the land_area=administrative tag if you want land-only borders.
ZeLonewolf (2020-06-14 22:52:36+00:00): I see now that one of the sets of polygons includes the over-water parts.  Thanks for pointing this out.  I'll work on putting that back.
notmyproblem1 (2025-06-21 19:59:38+00:00): perchè lo stop al contrario? mah
skfd (2020-06-11 11:13:47+00:00): Привет! iD к сожалению ставит тег shop=kiosk вместо building=kiosk. Я тоже использую building=kiosk для МАФов, но приходится руками а не из шаблона ставить )
JJIglesias (2020-06-16 22:24:15+00:00): Saludos, te he enviado un mensaje sobre el proposito del Mapa de OpenStreetMap, por favor leelo en detalle. El mapa nos beneficia a todos, pero tambien se puede estropear por cambios q aunque puedan parecer inocentes o sin mala intencion; pues afectan la calidad del mapa.
Saludos y espero q estes bien
att
JJ
tastrax (2020-06-13 06:39:44+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone and Fax numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
sinn156b (2020-06-15 04:03:37+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for pointing it out.
I learned a lot from what you said.
Cheers,
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-06-11 07:44:17+00:00): Dzięki za poprawę! Dzięki temu nie będzie musiało zgłoszenie czekać następne kilka lat aż ktoś inny mapujący się tam pojawi i zauważy uwagę :)

Gdybyś miał jakiekolwiek pytania/uwagi/problemy - śmiało pytaj się na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 (ten sam login) lub np. na grupie OSM na Telegramie
E de Wit (2020-06-11 07:33:05+00:00): Oh ja wandelnetwerk, ik zat nog met de fietroute langse De Skieding in m'n hoofd.
Ik zal beter op de tags letten om m'n fouten zoveel mogelijk te beperken.

Ik dacht dat ik het splitsen van rcn bij op- en afritten inmiddels wel onder de knie had met forward en backward...
dvdhoven (2020-06-11 08:48:27+00:00): Het is niet zo'n probleem hoor.
Ik zie het in knooppuntnet.nl verschijnen en repareer het even.
Nog even, mogelijk ten overvloede:
Bij forward/backward:
Eerst de heenrichting
Dan de terugrichting vanaf hetzelfde beginpunt, dus tegen de rijrichting in, maar wel zo getagd dat de rijrichting klopt.
Dat blijft voor mij ook altijd een lastige ook al heb ik het tich keer gedaan.
Ik kijk altijd naar de routelijnen in de route-editor, die geven heel goed aan of het fout of goed is.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
E de Wit (2020-06-11 11:48:31+00:00): Voorkomen is beter dan genezen. Gezien ik aardig wat kruisingen aan het splitsen ben zal ik het vast vaker tegenkomen.

Zeker niet ten overvloede, ik dacht dat het met de rijrichting mee moest worden geordend (met de klok mee of tegen de klok in) en niet vanaf het beginpunt.
Daar zit dan denk ik ook gelijk mijn fout.

-E de Wit
Vinber (2020-06-12 09:29:31+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).


Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Patchanka (2020-06-12 09:34:15+00:00): bonjour
Le tag : highway=bus_guideway ne correspond pas, s'agissant d'une "simple" voie de bus sans système de guidage. 
voir [cette page du wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway) et notamment la note en bas de page : "Attention: ne pas utiliser sur des voies bus classiques dédiés, dans ce cas plutot préférer highway=service access=no bus=yes."

Donc je serais d'avis de remettre highway=service
pio2_122 (2020-06-11 10:12:37+00:00): Jaki cel ma zmiana tagów landuse=basin na natural=water + water=basin? To, że wg iD jest to przestarzały, czy błędny tag nie jest zgodne z prawdą. Na oficjalnej wiki nie ma o tym ani słowa.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86502071
jmapb (2022-11-22 21:16:23+00:00): Hi Edward -- you tagged the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357581770 with wikidata item Q34855962 but this park already has Q7304317 (tagged on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13920588 ). Can you merge Q34855962 into Q7304317?

Thanks, Jason
SomeoneElse (2022-11-22 22:11:29+00:00): To add to ^^ this looks (at least in part) like a problematic import.  See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/merging-multiple-wikidata-tags/5839/8 for more details.
PT-53 (2020-06-11 12:13:50+00:00): Hallo turtlestreet,
anstelle des Merkmals Description könntest Du für die Firma das Merkmal craft=* verwenden. Dann könnte auch direkt danach gesucht werden.
Wäre
craft=tinsmith
das passende Merkmal?
Wiki Craft:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft
Wiki Tinsmith:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:craft%3Dtinsmith
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-06-21 06:22:22+00:00): Hallo turtlestreet,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Supaplex (2020-06-11 07:43:05+00:00): source: https://www-ws.gov.taipei/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMzczL3JlbGZpbGUvMTg5NzAvNjQyMDk2Ny8wMTEwMjM3OS1mZDllLTQwYWYtOGIwMC1lODEzNWFjOTNjMWUucGRm&n=6K6K5pu06Ie65YyX5biC5Lit5q2j5Y2A5Y2X5rW35q615LqU5bCP5q61NuWcsOiZn%2BetieWcn%2BWcsO%2B8iOWatOWutua3pue0gOW%2FteWckuWNgO%2B8ieS9j%2BWuheWNgOeCuuS%2FneWtmOWNgOS4u%2BimgeioiOeVq%2BahiCgxMDUxMjA35YWs5bGV54mIKS5wZGY%3D&icon=..pdf
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86502200
Sanniu (2020-10-08 08:44:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814859036 that you added crosses highway in arbitrary points without crossings.
Can you, please, fix that as you seems to have local knowledge?
matte (2020-06-12 22:31:50+00:00): l'attraversamento ciclabile era già stato inserito come `cicleway:left : opposite_lane` nella strada perché è proprio una pista disegnata sulla strada (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway) salvo nei raccordi all'angolo. Inoltre l'attraverso su corso vittorio non è separato rispetto all'attraversamento pedonale e non è collegato agli alberi in alto
raccoss (2020-06-17 09:22:32+00:00): Ciao. Non so se tu abiti in zona e puoi monitorare i lavori che stanno facendo sulla rotatoria ma, a parte l'errore dell'aver collegato la pista ciclabile con il viale alberato, non concordo con il parametro <cicleway:left : opposite_lane> in quanto la pista ciclabile che stanno facendo non è una semplice riga all'interno del mini-parcheggio sull'angolo della piazza, ma è  stato allargato il marciapiede e sono stati creati degli scivoli per facilitarne l'accesso. Dunque è fisicamente separata dalla strada e probabilmente il parametro più corretto sarebbe <cicleway:left : track>. Poi per essere superprecisi bisognerebbe anche evidenziare che il punto di salita sulla pista in corso Francia davanti al bar Jolly e il punto di discesa su Corso Vittorio si distaccano leggermente rispetto al tracciato della strada carrabile.
Penso che questa soluzione sia comunque migliore per l'uso di openstreetmap perchè il parametro che tu hai scelto non permette a chi non conosce la zona una visualizzazione utile per capire come si può attraversare quella rotatoria incasinata.
Noto inoltre che la rotatoria centrale di piazza Rivoli è ancora segnalata come parte di una ciclovia teorica, che doveva esser parte del fantomatico e utopico Biciplan di 10 anni fa.
eggie (2020-06-11 10:50:15+00:00): Hi,

Please confirm this is an place for specific use in tourism called drachten?

Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-11 14:38:30+00:00): reverted by changeset  #86522681
Map_HeRo (2024-05-24 16:52:45+00:00): Hallo Kantor Wehrbein, Du hast hier riesige zusammenhängende "Gras"-flächen gemappt, die alles beinhalten, was es an Grünzeug gibt: Gras, Weideflächen, Gebüsch, Baumgruppen und dazu noch ein paar Straßen und Feldwege.
Es ist eine irre Arbeit, diese Konglomerate zu entzerren und korrekt zu taggen. Bitte nur Flächen von überschaubarer Größe zusammenhängend mappen und vor allem keine Straßen und Wege mit den Rändern der Landuse-Flächen verkleben. Danke und Gruß Mikke.
totera (2020-06-11 21:52:37+00:00): Ciao, ti invito a valutare con un po' di attenzione le modifiche proposte da iD:
1) L'autostazione (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2480001) non è un edificio.
2) A parte i due estremi, questa strada (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35022740) è sul piano di campagna e non è un ponte.
3) Qual è l'utilità di sostituire la pagina su Wikipedia in italiano di un marchio italiano per un POI che si trova in italia (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/644161559) con quella in ceco?
damianeue (2020-06-12 12:44:33+00:00): Grazie per le puntualizzazioni, starò più attento
!bm (2020-06-11 11:53:44+00:00): Hallo maqbln, 

zunächst willkommen zu OSM! #ReviewRequestReply

1) Der Eintrag ist unvollständig – das Gebäude heißt sicher nicht "Berliner Flughafen Gesellschaft mbH", da fehlt zumindest ein office=company (oder spezifischer, s. Wiki) – und das auch nur, falls das Unternehmen das Gebäude alleine nutzt, andernfalls wäre ein node sinnvoller.
2) Was ist die Quelle für deine Änderungen? Aus den angebenen Orthophotos kann ich diese nicht ableiten. Bitte Quellen (source=*) stets (als Tag des Changesets!) angeben!
3) https://www.berlin-airport.de/de/global/impressum/index.php nennt nur Sitz in Schönefeld 

Bitte um kurze Rückmeldung! 

--besteGrüße!bm
maqbln (2020-06-12 13:42:16+00:00): Hallo !bm
Vielen Dank für dein Feedback & Hilfe!

Ich habe als Gebäudetyp building=commercial ausgewählt. Die Eigenschaft office habe ich ergänzt, und die name-Eigenschaft entsprechend entfernt. 

Das Gebäude wird von der BFG alleine genutzt. Die BFG ist eine 100%ige Tocher der Flughafen Berlin Brandenburg GmbH. Daher findet man auch als erstes den Bezug zur FBB, die ihren Sitz in Schönefeld hat. 

Einige Bilder bei Wiki-Commons zeigen auch auf den Sitz der BFG https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Flughafen_Berlin_Brandenburg_GmbH

Danke für Deine Geduld & ein schönes Wochenende
maqbln
!bm (2020-06-12 14:07:58+00:00): Hallo maqbln, 
ich sehe keine neuen Änderungen? Evt nicht hochgeladen/abgeschlossen? name=* wäre in Kombination mit entsprechenden Tag wie office=* etc nicht falsch, mit building=* alleine aber unvollständig.
--besteGrüße!bm
maqbln (2020-06-12 14:18:19+00:00): Hallo !bm,
ja, speichern sollte man das auch.
Grüße & schönes WE,
maqbln
trial (2020-06-16 16:09:32+00:00): Dans votre configuration d'utilisateur OSM, je vous (te) conseille de mettre en langues favorites :
fr-FR fr en en-US
Comme ça iD va parler français.
Ici "vétérinaire" est une description en française. iD râle, il a raison.
Car c'est un cabinet vétérinaire et non un truc qui s'appelle "vétérinaire" (sans majuscule).
Cliquez sur Terrains hospitaliers (ce que n'est pas un vétérinaire) commencez à taper vété et hop vous avez amenity=veterinary
 (supprimer aussi healthcare=hospital).
Les addr:city et addr:postcode sont inutiles et donc nuisibles (risque de se tromper) : en France on connait les codes postaux et les délimitations des communes.
Je disais ça comme ça mais en plus ici c'est le cas : la commune pour la poste c'est Guerlédan et non plus Mür-de-Bretagne qui n'est plus qu'une commune déléguée. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6837634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/358773
De plus un vétérinaire c'est plus un POI (point d'intérêt/point of interest), la tendance est de mettre un point à l'intérieur du bâti plutôt que sur le bâti.
Vous corrigez vos 10 modifs et me dites ici ou en message privé quand vous voulez que je refasse une passe ?
PuMa17 (2020-06-11 10:53:48+00:00): Sieht gut aus. Danke!
eggie (2020-06-19 19:30:23+00:00): Dag Martijn... Een fietspad dat op bicycle=no staat. 
Is dit tijdelijk of vervalt de tag highway=cycleway?
MVG,
Eggie