piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-09 08:29:56+00:00): Is this import discussed anywhere? Please, include link to discussion in changeset tags.

Note that url:en tag is utterly useless as it points to file at your computer.

Please, fix addresses at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/41.07997/-85.25510
Indianamap_imports (2018-05-10 15:36:33+00:00): The address that is supposed to be in the url:en tag is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Address_import_for_Allen_County_Indiana

What are you saying is wrong with the addresses at the link you provided?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-11 07:35:47+00:00): Addresses are mapped as nodes next to buildings instead as nodes placed at buildings.

It is necessary to move all of them.
jgon6 (2018-05-12 15:20:30+00:00): Mateusz, I agree that the addresses being mapped on the buildinging is better. but that does not mean it is the only way they can be mapped. To quote the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses

Addresses can be tagged with addr:housenumber=* and the other addr:* keys. Tags can be added to :

* isolated nodes
* nodes that are parts of building polygons ( = entrance=*s )
* building=* polygons
* on polygons representing the perimeter of the site.

The map in this area has very few building outlines rightnow, it's not like Europe here in the US. While I agree it's a good end goal to have all the buildings mapped with addresses on them that is a long ways off from happening. On top of that, the map has always been working on incrementally improving, it's not like mapping is an all or nothing thing.
cyclist789 (2026-07-30 07:38:03+00:00): Kan det bekræftes, at vandløb way/353276079 findes? Jeg kunne godt mistænke, at vandet løber væk derfra i begge retninger. Så jeg ville fjerne det lille vandløb og markere vandløbet sydøst for det med flow_direction=unknown.
eggie (2018-04-29 21:16:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-04-29 21:20:39+00:00): De naam staat ook op het gebouw. Dat hoort eigenlijk niet. Het is de naam van het "bedrijf."
eggie (2018-04-29 21:24:27+00:00): naam van gebouw gehaald.. office toegevoegd aan node
maraf24 (2018-04-30 14:04:41+00:00): Te kółeczka to nie są parki.
eggie (2018-04-29 21:17:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
hsc666 (2018-04-30 19:36:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58565127 where the changeset comment is: Revert fictional parks added to cheat Pokémon Go. Edits on OSM must match the reality on the ground! https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/04/01/tips-pokemon-go-2
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-24 08:17:52+00:00): "Żadnych śladów." - w takim razie usuwam też historic=ruins (jest to dla ruin które mają jakąś wartość historyczną, nie dla już nieistniejących ruin)

Wielkie dzięki za sprawdzenie.
Anazaar (2018-06-24 13:22:29+00:00): Przeoczyłem te  historic=ruins 🤔
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-24 20:03:21+00:00): Nie ma żadnego problemu, jeszcze raz dzięki za sprawdzenie w terenie :)
viloan (2018-04-29 21:29:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
hsc666 (2018-04-30 19:36:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58565127 where the changeset comment is: Revert fictional parks added to cheat Pokémon Go. Edits on OSM must match the reality on the ground! https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/04/01/tips-pokemon-go-2
Akkurator (2018-05-21 12:35:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496280868:
Warum bekommt dieser kleine Anwohnerparkplatz ein toilets:wheelchair=no?
Es gibt hier kein Gebäude, keine Toiletten, nur ein paar kleine Büsche. Nach dieser Logik könnte man jeden Parkplatz mit toilets:wheelchair=no taggen.
errezz (2018-05-21 15:27:55+00:00): Ich habe auf wheelmap.org keinen Punkt gesehen, wie mit Orten ohne Toilette umgegangen wird. Und da die App nur die Möglichkeit des ja und nein bietet (rückgängig machen geht auch nicht mehr) empfand ich das als passendere Option
Akkurator (2018-06-01 02:12:26+00:00): Orte ohne Toilette bekommen einfach kein toilets Tag.
Dass wheelmap bei jedem Minipopelparkplatz nach Toiletten fragt, ist ein wheelmap-Problem und sollte am besten einfach ignoriert werden.
Akkurator (2018-06-01 02:37:37+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=700849#p700849
geri-oc (2018-07-01 13:05:27+00:00): @errezz: Also ich verstehe nicht, dass du Fehler der APP nicht löschst (editierst doch auch mit JOSM). Auch sollte man wheelmap über die Probleme berichten.
errezz (2018-07-01 13:37:27+00:00): Mein PC verkraftet JOSM nicht wirklich. Ich kann das ändern wenn ich auf der Arbeit einen Slot Zeit finde...
Akkurator (2018-07-01 13:45:16+00:00): Die Kleinigkeit, um die es in diesem CS geht, habe ich längst gefixt. MMn keine weitere Aktivität erforderlich.
Jolesh (2020-08-29 06:00:06+00:00): Die Öffnungszeiten des Steinmetzes scheinen korrekt zu sein. Man kann das gut mit https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ überprüfen.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-05-01 13:24:02+00:00): Vias foram desconectadas nesse changeset http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-55.89926&lat=-13.07926&zoom=14&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-05-05 19:39:53+00:00): revertido, usuário não corrigiu os erros nem respondeu.
magacima (2018-05-05 21:07:01+00:00): As vias foram conectadas
viloan (2018-04-29 22:23:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
seav (2018-05-16 05:36:07+00:00): If the highway is not actually *currently* being constructed (or is still in the proposed state), marking it as highway=construction is not appropriate.

Even then, only the sections that are being constructed should be marked as highway=construction and not the whole highway.
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-06-19 20:26:40+00:00): I'll be redoing this, with the Skyway-C5 section only marked as constructed. The rest will be marked as proposed for now.
Ale_Zena_IT (2018-04-30 07:20:26+00:00): Ciao, come puoi vedere da questa foto https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=R9W1yBFZnTqkwoujOIKqNg&lat=44.4074921197292&lng=8.975240946615031&z=19.813238187168576&focus=photo il limite lì è ancora 50. Il limite di 60 inizia molto più avanti (sino all'incrocio con Via Isonzo è 50 intervallato da 30)
I-76 (2023-06-09 18:56:01+00:00): viewpoint should not be named
maxerickson (2018-05-06 20:15:30+00:00): Hi-

Please do no add fake data in an attempt to manipulate Pokemon Go. This is vandalism and will be removed.


Thanks,

Max
adrianojbr (2018-05-06 15:55:21+00:00): essa lavoura pertence ou é administrada pela prefeitura?
Wynndale (2018-05-01 07:41:20+00:00): You used the tag landuse=wood instead of natural=wood or landuse=forest. You also need to remember that OSM data is used by a variety of search, routing and other applications, not only maps, and they will try to interpret anything that you put in the name tag.
DD1GJ (2018-04-30 18:36:44+00:00): Hallo baumeister22, ich habe den neuen Park wieder gelöscht und vom alten das Gebäude-Tag entfernt, das du fälschlicherweise im Januar gesetzt hattest. Verwende bitte aussagekräftigere Kommentare der Änderungssätze.
TourenbikerFKB (2018-04-30 19:03:34+00:00): und noch eine Bitte: der Neubau nebenan (Badener Str. 2) hat sicherlich keinen solchen windschiefen Grundriss. Wenn du im Editor den Umriss markierst und die Taste "s" drückst, wird er rechtwinklig
jonorossi (2018-05-07 11:20:21+00:00): Hi, what is the source for your waterways data? I've noticed over the last several months you've added quite a lot of good stuff to waterways right across the Redlands, much better than my guessing using local knowledge and looking at patterns of trees. However I am a little concerned that you aren't acknowledging the source of the data as I can't imagine you are surveying this amount and most is on private property.

I'd also like to point out the two fords you've added to "Teesdale Kinross Fire Line" in Redlands Track Park are wrong, both have culverts, the western one is huge and always has water so couldn't be missed if surveyed.

I'm still learning, but is there a reason you've created fords as points rather than using a node of the path/waterway?

Jono
jonorossi (2018-05-15 11:26:07+00:00): Hello again, did you see my comment?
B22789 (2018-05-28 23:36:22+00:00): Hi Jonrossi. I don't have a source for the waterways data; it's most just closely looking at satellite imagery and other maps to see how they relate. This means I can occasionally get this wrong, as you have mentioned above. I sometimes put fords as points as I have seen it done like this elsewhere on OSM, though I have tended to make them a way recently. Sorry for the late response, as I am a fairly infrequent user.
jonorossi (2018-05-29 16:39:36+00:00): Guessing there is a ford where there could be a culvert or bridge isn't ideal, you shouldn't map something just to hide the warning message about a highway and waterway crossing if you can't determine what is there from aerial imagery.

I had no problem with fords as nodes especially for small fords, it is actually suggested on the wiki for fords to be a shared node between highway and waterway as they are the same layer; the strangeness I saw was that you created a separate standalone node (referred to as a "point" in iD) which wasn't part of either way.
B22789 (2018-05-31 00:33:10+00:00): In future I won't tag fords/culverts where the satellite imagery doesn't support said observation or if I do not know the area. I'll keep your advice as to how to map fords as well, and will map them as single nodes on a waterway/trail/roadway in future.
jonorossi (2018-05-31 04:26:11+00:00): Thanks
sannkc (2018-04-30 19:57:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  I reviewed your changeset and made a few adjustments to the campus grounds. There were a couple of places where the area boundary cut through nearby houses or didn't follow the edge of the road, so I cleaned those up. The eastern side may still need some adjustments, because the online CMU campus map doesn't show the actual property line of campus, so I had to do some guesswork there.  Also, I changed the state abbreviation to MO, since MS is for Mississippi.  Anyway, it's great to see someone mapping the CMU campus.  Hope to see more changes in the future!
felipeeugenio (2018-05-04 18:07:32+00:00): Estimado
1) Porqué cambió los nombres de los pasajes a Uno, Dos, Tres, si estaban 1, 2 y 3. Que es como sale en el cartel? de donde está sacando la información?
Extrañamente están igual en google.
2) los techos de estacionamiento o de bombas de bencina se dibujan building=roof. Shelter es totalmente otro concepto
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-05-02 18:54:50+00:00): Olá Diogo bem vindo. Agradeço que corrija a categoria de leisure=garden  e elimine o "nome"="terreno de cultivo privado adjacente a uma casa privada". Caso contrário alguém procurará por "jardins" e irá aparecer essa categoria e são propriedade privada. Os nomes que atribuiu não existem, logo não devem ser chamados como tal, o que você adicionou como name, é uma descrição. Recomendo uma leitura da wiki do OpenStreetMap. Agradeço que corrija, caso contrário terei de fazer rollback ao changeset.

Cumprimentos,

Nuno Caldeira
marcoos69 (2018-04-30 10:18:18+00:00): Nie za szerokie te zmiany? W opisie jest Poznań, a zmiany są w Łodzi?
viloan (2018-04-30 02:02:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DUGA (2021-05-15 23:32:46+00:00): Please carefully read wiki before adding waterways.

Your previous edit damaged the map.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8257094#map=18/39.70971/-78.56730
eggie (2018-04-30 07:16:44+00:00): Hoi.. het is gebruikelijk dat tunnel=culvert wordt getagd op een waterway=...   meestal ditch. Dus niet op een gesloten polygoon.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream
Dan zul je dus dat natural=water moeten opknippenen tussen de vlakken een waterway=ditch maken met tunnel=culvert. 
tunnel=culvert "mag"dus niet op een natural=water (vlak)
Gaat je dat lukken dat opknippen?
eggie (2018-04-30 07:29:37+00:00): Opknippen hoeft niet zie ik al. Bij Windsingel 23 heb ik een voorbeeld gemaakt. In de wiki staat niets over layer=-1. Ikzelf doe het altijd wel.
Josm geeft een foutmelding bij die culverts op vlakken. Onwaarschijnlijke tagcombinatie.
lvstee (2018-04-30 13:44:47+00:00): Dank je wel voor het voorbeeld, ik begrijp wat je bedoelt! Echter zit ik even te twijfelen aan hoe realistisch een greppel is voor deze situatie. De sloten zijn allemaal zo'n 4 meter breed en zo'n 1,5 meter diep. De duikers die hier onder de wegen door lopen zijn vrijwel hetzelfde in formaat, misschien 3 meter over de breedte, maar het zijn halve duikers, alleen de bovenkant is van steen en golfplaat. Na even googlen kom ik op een 'vaarduiker' uit. Past een greppel/ditch hier wel bij? Of moet het misschien toch niet als duiker getagd worden?
lvstee (2018-04-30 13:46:03+00:00): Je kan namelijk met een boot makkelijk door de duikers heen, dus het is begaanbaar gebied. Ik weet niet of dit wat aan de situatie veranderd.
eggie (2018-04-30 15:22:15+00:00): Dat zijn van die twijfel gevallen.. Gewoon doen wat je het beste vindt. Het is net bij viaducten en tunnel.. Daar kom ik soms ook niet uit. 
Volgens mij rendert waterway=canal breder dan =ditch
Even gespiekt.. Zelf vind ik het toch meer een brug.  Ik ga voor brug :)
lvstee (2018-04-30 17:43:11+00:00): Ben er net nog even langs gefietst om extra te controleren hoe ze eruit zien. De duikers zijn toch iets minder breed dan ik dacht, zo'n twee meter doorsnede denk ik. Heb gelijk even foto's genomen bij Pyronhof 5 en 1 om te vergelijken met een brug (eerste foto is de duiker, tweede is een brug). Hier de foto's: https://imgur.com/a/znfR7xG
Ik denk dat misschien voor waterway=canal gaan de beste optie in dit geval is.
eggie (2018-04-30 19:17:23+00:00): Wel serieus bezig!
2. is duidelijk... 1. twijfelgeval. Ik pas :).. en zelfs daar twijfel ik over... Toch eerder duiker. Er zit geen echt zichtbare  constructie boven.. grond en dan de straat. 
Ook door een duiker kun je met een kano. In het verleden trok ik me liggend in m'n kano wel door soort ronde duikers heen onder de dijk door in de Biesbosch.
lvstee (2018-04-30 21:49:05+00:00): Nee klopt, het is gewoon een tunnel die helemaal bedekt is met gras en planten, niet echt een brug dus. Ik ga denk ik maar gewoon de waterway tag aanpassen naar canal, ik vind het namelijk niet helemaal kloppen om er een brug van te maken met een greppel. Thanks voor je hulp!
user_5359 (2018-04-30 09:35:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-30 03:21:27+00:00): Might doublecheck your geometry on the track, doesn't seem to line up with what is visible on aerial.  Also, name=* isn't for descriptions.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58541293
user_5359 (2018-04-30 09:34:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a short look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking for a better description of a parking area.
GOwin (2018-05-01 08:32:49+00:00): Hi @Airborne90.

We've recently noticed the edits you've been doing in the CdO area. Thank you for your map contributions, and helping the community make a better of map your favorite neighborhoods.

There's this concise tips page for Philippine contributors: https://telegra.ph/Awesome-OSM-Tips--Tricks-01-28

Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: https://telegra.ph/OpenStreetMap-LoCo-channels-in-the-Philippines-02-15

If you have any questions at all, please feel free to get in touch. You might be doubtful about a particular tag, or would like to clarify their use. Or perhaps, you have ideas you want to flesh out  to improve your neighbourhood map. Or maybe  just want to know more about OSM.  

Welcome and best regards, in behalf of the OSM contributors' community
/[GOwin](https://t.me/GOwin)
Markus366 (2018-05-01 22:58:53+00:00): Hallo,

mit diesem Changeset wurden einige tags gelöscht. Leider geht der Grund dafür aus deinem Changeset-Kommentar nicht hervor.

Bitte erläutere deine Absicht hierzu.

Markus
amilen (2018-05-08 20:51:22+00:00): Hallo Markus366,
das stimmt. Nicht nur das, ich hatte hier im CS-Kommentar sogar auch verpasst, zumindest generell mal zu erwähnen, dass teilweise place Nodes geändert wurden. 
Wie im anderen Änderungssatz-Diskussionskommentar erwähnt (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58570872) habe ich auch hier die openGeoDB Eigenschaften zum grössen Teil von ein oder zwei place Nodes entfernt. Es gab zu diesem Thema einige Kommentare in einem alten osm-Forum-Thread, siehe: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=17293.   
Ich schliesse aus Deiner Nachfrage und vermute mal, Du möchtest diese openGeoDB-Tags erhalten. Warum?  
Viele Grüsse  
Amilen
viloan (2018-04-30 04:26:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
gebux (2018-04-30 16:35:14+00:00): Hallo JM82, 
warum veränderst du bereits gemappte Gebiete um Wohnhäuser herum auf landuse=grass? Ich habe mich etwas in Österreich und den umgrenzenden Ländern umgeschaut und habe keine Gegend gefunden wo das so gehandhabt wird ('deine' Bezirke mal ausgenommen)
JM82 (2018-04-30 17:07:52+00:00): Hallo,

Ich habe bei Hausnummer 42 die Fläche vergrößert, da sich hier eine Grasfläche (zwischen Äckern befindet). Ein einzelnes Haus ist wohl kaum ein "Gebiet, das überwiegend mit Wohnhäusern und Wohn-Geschäftshäusern aller Art bebaut ist; auch für Wohn- und Mischgebiete vorgesehene Baugebiete" (Zitat OSM-Wiki)
Gleiches für die Hausnummer 41. 
Sonst habe ich bei den übrigen beiden Flächen den Tag "surface" = "grass" ergänzt, was ja auch richtig ist, denn um die Häuser herum wächst Gras (im Gegensatz zu den vielen Äckern im Umland).
gebux (2018-04-30 17:36:52+00:00): An der Kreuzung Geisterbrückenweg/Goggitschweg  schaut es aber schon so aus als ob das Areal ein Gebiet ist das überwiegend mit Wohnhäusern bebaut ist. Beide Landuses wurden von dir umgetaggt. Mir ist schon klar das man für beide Varianten argumentieren kann. Wenn ich auf der Karte landuse=grass mit Gebäuden sehe, denke ich aber eher an eine Wiese mit Stall/Schuppen anstatt eines Privathauses + umliegenden Garten. Und wenn ich mir die Häufigkeit der Kombination Landuse =residential+Gebäude versus landuse=grass+Gebäude anschaue hat sich die residential-variante klar durchgesetzt.
JM82 (2018-04-30 18:10:59+00:00): Ich möchte mit dem Tag "landuse" = "grass" nur zum Ausdruck bringen, dass eben hier Gras wächst, wie auch das Wiki beschreibt "Allgemein eine innerörtliche Fläche, auf der Gras wächst". Ich möchte damit keinesfalls die unmittelbare Verwendung beschreiben, also wie das Gras verwendet wird: ob hier eine Wiese vorhanden ist, auf der ein Landwirt Kühe hält, ob das Gras eigentlich ein Rasen ist usw.
Die vielen landuse = residential stammen in der Südoststeiermark offenbar aus Zeiten, als niemand die Gebäude mappen wollte oder konnte bzw. aus (halb-)automatischen Imports vor vielen Jahren. mittlerweile sind Gebäude vorhanden, die ebenso klar getaggt werden können und sollten (z.B. Wohngebäude, Einfamilienhaus usw.), wodurch die Nutzung erkennbar wird und in diesem Fall (bitte nicht allgemein verstehen) der "residential" tag 
Bedingt durch die massive Zersiedelung in dieser Region, ist es mMn schwer, bei ein paar wenigen Häusern ein "Gebiet" zu argumentieren, im besonderen, wie im Wiki festgehalten.
Wenn du meinst, residential ist hier besser, dann kannst du natürlich den Tag wieder ändern.
Warin61 (2018-05-02 21:43:41+00:00): Hi,
The relation 584484312 carries a name ... but no physical or administration features ... What is it?????