piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osmviborg (2020-02-13 15:18:20+00:00): Den mast du her kalder 'Blåvand Radio', er en mast med en af Søværnets kystradarer på toppen. Se rettesæt 80964816 for placeringen af den nu lukkede Blåvand Radio. Se mere her: https://jv.dk/artikel/en-epoke-slutter-efter-105-%C3%A5r-bl%C3%A5vand-satellitstation-lukker
Hjart (2020-02-13 17:15:33+00:00): Ok, jeg fandt nogle underlige koordinater på WP og ledte efter et sandsyńligt hjemsted for dem. Jeg har endda tidligere rodet med det rigtige sted flere gange.
Anton Khorev (2021-01-31 18:57:21+00:00): Вопрос по сайт, аналогичный тому, что здесь:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93294165

Чем https://happylook.ru/ лучше по сравнению с https://happylook.ru/stores/spb/209/ , учитывая что ставится он на точку отдельного магазина, а не всей сети. Для сети целиком обычно и нет никакого осмовского элемента, хотя некоторые участники собирают отдельные точки в отношения. Да сейчас урл магазина поменялся, но со старого есть редирект на новый.
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-15 15:53:54+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81046777
fgouget (2020-02-19 12:47:11+00:00): Le changement de la place Castellane casse l'avenue du Prado :
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#item=1210&zoom=17&lat=43.285195&lon=5.383987&level=1

Je pense que le problème vient de ce que highway=pedestrian a été déplacé vers la relation, ce qui empêche Osmose de reconnaître que l'avenue du Prado est connectée à un highway. Il se peut que le routage soit également cassé.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-14 01:11:27+00:00): Thanks for fixing.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3453 for info.
Blueberry (2020-02-13 17:40:34+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenstreetMap. Si cet emplacement est occupé par un luthier, le tag approprié est "craft=luthier"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:craft%3Dluthier

Cordialement

Eric [Blueberry]
Kovoschiz (2020-02-13 16:08:52+00:00): Use `opening_date=` for future expected opening date, not `start_date=`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80962998
user_5359 (2020-02-16 12:17:39+00:00): welcome to OSM! We normally don't paint street areas but only an "imaginary" center line. When we draw a larger area, we use the tag area=yes, so that not the border is drawn but the whole area.
DaveF (2020-02-13 22:59:28+00:00): Hi
Why do believe this is a grave yard?
Richard (2020-03-26 23:17:21+00:00): Hi! Great to see the work you've been doing and thanks in particular for adding surface tags - these make a big difference.

I'd suggest you have a bit of a look at best practice elsewhere on highway classifications. highway=primary certainly shouldn't be used for unpaved county roads in the US - it's used for US routes and for the most important State routes. For unpaved roads you'll almost always want highway=unclassified, or highway=tertiary at a pinch if it's a very good quality one (but this is most applicable in the Midwest where there are few other roads).

Paved county roads could be highway=tertiary or highway=unclassified - a good road with a centreline is more likely to be =tertiary. 

Richard
WoodWoseWulf (2020-02-14 01:58:32+00:00): Hi umarkhan,

Welcome to OSM!

There's already a park at this location:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43315119
There's no need to duplicate it as a second park covering the same location. By chance, were you attempting to change the name or include it in the other park area just to the North?
viloan (2020-02-13 15:02:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
CRCulver (2020-02-21 09:42:32+00:00): Tourism=artwork is not a standard tagging for statues of historical figures in squares, and that is why I removed it.
maraf24 (2020-02-22 18:24:51+00:00): I can't see antything not standard here. Two main tags were used and both are valid.
CRCulver (2020-02-22 18:31:21+00:00): That the tourism=artwork and historic=memorial tags are not meant to be combined in modern OSM, is clear from how the most popular renderers have chosen to act. If tourism=artwork is not present, then they will show attributes of the memorial (i.e. whether it is a statue, bust, stone, etc.), but once you add tourism=artwork, then all that information is lost.

I have clicked around some major statues of historical figures in Europe, and they do not combine the tags, so your choice does seem nonstandard and IMHO deleterious.
maraf24 (2020-02-24 18:22:01+00:00): "That the tourism=artwork and historic=memorial tags are not meant to be combined in modern OSM"

Any sources corroborating this opinion? 

"is clear from how the most popular renderers have chosen to act. "

Renderers don't dictate how we tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

"I have clicked around some major statues of historical figures in Europe, and they do not combine the tags, so your choice does seem nonstandard and IMHO deleterious."

In OSM, we tag the reality. I mapped here modern sculpture (tourism=artwork) depicting historical person (historic=memorial) - https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pomnik_Boles%C5%82awa_Chrobrego_we_Wroc%C5%82awiu

It's perfect and coherent tagging - memorial attribute doesn't mix with artwork attribute i.e. "memorial" and "artwork_type". The other tags are shared as they should be.
CRCulver (2020-02-24 18:49:42+00:00): Please spare me the “we don’t tag for the renderer”. I have been an OSM editor for a long time now and I am well aware of that.

However, the behavior of the most common renderers is a perfectly valid guide to expectations of what "main tags" should and should not be mixed in modern OSM. There are many cases where a POI should not get more than a single main tag, and in the case of historic=memorial, memorial=statue community practice suggests that this tag already serves to fully describe the POI without the need for tourism=artwork (a tag that is used mainly for artworks that do not depict historical figures).

I don’t see why Wroclaw should have a tagging practice that sets it apart from other European cities.
maraf24 (2020-02-25 09:37:33+00:00): That's again tagging for renderer used as a argument.

You can start you own proposal to forbid using historic=memorial and tourism=artwork on the same node.
If you win the voting, I will change the tagging.
maraf24 (2020-02-25 12:35:06+00:00): "I don’t see why Wroclaw should have a tagging practice that sets it apart from other European cities."

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6753188758
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4428933478
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4747785544
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/737622860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4227011565
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3033585642
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6208663142
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2995416837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4418258887

You're welcome.
CRCulver (2020-02-25 16:24:33+00:00): As these examples were added by disparate editors, then the examples you link to are not in themselves convincing, as those editors could have simply thrown every seemingly valid tag at the node.

However, I see now that Vespucci does not overwrite tags when setting up a historical=memorial and then going on to choose tourism=artwork from the menu. That does convince me that this tags may be reasonably combined (though one may wonder why Vespucci does not automatically tag the POI with both tags if, as you claim, both are important.) Therefore, I will let both tags stand in future.

However, note that in several of your linked examples, artwork_type=statue is used to complement memorial=statue. Therefore, your tagging choice of artwork_type=sculpture ought to be changed. Indeed, the OSM wiki says, “If the work represents people or animals, you should use artwork_type = statue.”
maraf24 (2020-02-25 21:20:44+00:00): You're nitpicking.
And personally I think you can't stand being criticized. But it is not my problem.
CRCulver (2020-02-25 21:39:25+00:00): I can’t stand being criticized by people who do it rudely and brusquely because, as I said, you risk scaring off less-confident editors and newbies by doing this.
SekeRob (2021-10-08 19:02:41+00:00): Hi

May I ask what the meaning is of all these water taps. (Posting a change set without description is not very helpful). The reason I'm asking is that west of Pescara is a former waste dump, I've seen it grow, being covered over by plastic and ground and on the side there's some kind of gas driven plant was installed. On that waste dump there were too 50+ drink water taps mapped. Is that water in or out? I've got trouble understanding.

cheers.

PS drink-water, but no tag if its actually potable, or other tagging.
SekeRob (2021-10-17 11:50:43+00:00): Me again, got no answer from you. Visited the location. It's absolutely plastic/earth covered waste dump 'Discarica "Colle Cese" di Spoltore with a gas powered plant on the side... methane gas from the waste dump which leaves the question as to what these P1-P52 are. Any clue for me?
gileri (2020-02-13 20:28:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Quelle est la source pour ces modifications ? Cela m'étonne que tous les bâtiments aient changé de nom et fonction depuis ce changeset :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75581263
gileri (2020-03-15 13:21:17+00:00): Revert partiel ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82217191
Thierry P (2020-08-18 07:27:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Mes meilleures sources seront vos yeux si vous venez constater in situ, puisque suite à de très nombreux changements ces dernières années, peu ou pas de plans ont été mis à jour. Alors avant que vous constatiez les changements par vues satellite ou par doc archives dispo dans le domaine public, on aura perdu beaucoup de temps tous les 2 à "se battre" à faire et refaire.
(PS: concernant les fonctions des bâtiments, je n'aurai jamais dû faire un essai de rendu graphique sur l'ensemble de notre site, et avec des données aléatoires. C'était "stupide")
CRCulver (2020-02-13 15:43:05+00:00): Why have you reverted my changes here? These stairs are accompanied by a wheelchair ramp, and therefore ramp:wheelchair is the right tagging.
maraf24 (2020-02-13 16:15:58+00:00): That's not true.
CRCulver (2020-02-13 16:18:30+00:00): Yes, it is true, because I was just here three days ago and I saw this with my own eyes. The line rendered in blue on OSM.org is the ramp for the nearby stairs (with a handrail for wheelchair users). If you want people sent along the ramp instead of the stairs in routing scenarios, then one can tag the stairs ramp=separate, but nevertheless the stairs should be marked for accessibility for users who wish to determine how many highway=steps are accompanied by ramps.
maraf24 (2020-02-13 16:30:21+00:00): Yes, the blue line is the ramp. Thanks for acknowledgment.
The stairs don't have ramp bult into them and that's why I removed your tagging.
You can add ramp tags to the proper way i.e. the blue one.
ramp=separate is ok if you really need to count stairs with nearby ramp. It doesn't seem to be much popular tag though.
CRCulver (2020-02-13 16:35:23+00:00): Ramp=separate (like sidewalk=separate for roads) is an important tag to avoid StreetComplete users being prompted to fill in the tags on highway=steps. 

> You can add ramp tags to the proper way i.e. the blue one. 

Ramp:wheelchair would not be appropriate for the blue way because it is not a highway=steps. See the wiki entry.
maraf24 (2020-02-13 19:10:48+00:00): If you know the wiki why you added these tags here? This case is covered there by ramp=seperate and incline tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Ramp-separate.png
Blueberry (2020-02-13 17:32:53+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap ! Il est incorrect de mettre un tag "name=Maison de Léonie". J'ai corrigé ce point.
Bonne suite dans OSM ! 

Eric [Blueberry]
Luzandro (2020-02-16 10:14:24+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe das Feld wieder aus der Wasserlauf-Relation der Pinka entfernt. Ich habe dabei auch den Namen "Jabing" entfernt, da das wohl kaum der Name dieses einen Feldes ist.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80965411
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-15 15:40:41+00:00): Should be reviewed.
Luzandro (2020-02-16 09:59:37+00:00): Hallo,

du hattest hier mehrere fehlerhafte Flächen übereinander und ohne Eigenschaften hochgeladen. Ich habe diese wieder entfernt.

LG Andreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80965792
Blueberry (2020-02-13 17:30:01+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour votre première contribution dans OSM ! :) J'ai juste corrigé le tag "building=Maison" qui est incorrect. Les tags recommandés pour "building" sont décrits dans :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:building?uselang=fr
Sur vos 2 maisons ajoutées, j'ai mis le tag "building=house". 
Bonne continuation :)

Eric [Blueberry]
l3BAM (2020-07-14 13:58:07+00:00): Bonjour. En France, un cimetière municipal n'a pas légalement de religion spécifique même si la religion catholique y est souvent majoritaire. Il faudrait supprimer l'attribut religion.
sovereign_ch (2020-02-13 21:11:28+00:00): Auch wenn das Routing jetzt (für eine von ca. 18 Routen) stimmt: eine mobile Leitplanke zwischen den vier Spuren (auf 2+2 geteilt, in JOSM ist das Luftbild verfügbar), ist das nicht nicht Spurmapping anstatt Spurtagging? Ich überlege dies zu revertieren und wäre froh über unabhängige Meinungen. LG
-ckb- (2020-02-14 11:26:42+00:00): Hallo sovereign_ch,

Ich bin mir jetzt nicht sicher ob wir vom selben reden. Der von der angeführte Änderungssatz betrifft nur meine Änderung/Korrektur der von mir angeführten ptv2-Busroute. In dieser Relation war ein "Straßenstück" des ebenso "gemappten" rechten Fahrstreifens. Was eine "mobile Leitplanke" sein soll - mit dieser Definition kann ich leider nichts anfangen. Als Leitplanke verstehe ich eine bauliche Trennung zwischen den beiden Fahrbahnen. Egal was es auch sein soll: in der ptv2-Relation haben meines Erachtens nur die vorgegebenen Rollen etwas zu suchen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Public_transport). Eine Leitplanke fällt nicht darunter. Aber ich glaube nicht, dass dies dein Anliegen war.

Bezüglich "lanes" (vermute dass sind die einzelnen Fahrstreifen einer Richtungsfahrbahn) bin ich absolut unwissend - sprich: ich habe mich damit nie in OSM befasst geschweige "getaggt" und schon gar nicht "gemappt".

Also als absoluter Laie und Unwissender in dieser Angelegenheit würde ich sagen: diese Fahrstreifen wurden offensichtlich "gemappt" und nicht "getaggt". Aber nicht von mir bzw. nicht in dem von dir angeführten Änderungssatz.

Sei so gut und teil mit ob wir absolut von zwei verschiedenen  Sachen schreiben.

Glg
-ckb- (2020-02-14 11:37:15+00:00): Dein Anliegen dürfte wahrscheinlich folgenden Änderungssatz betreffen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80913808#map=15/47.4081/8.5927
sovereign_ch (2020-02-14 13:00:00+00:00): Ohje, du hast nichts falsch gemacht, tut mir leid wenn du dies so verstanden hast. In der Tat geht es um das vorgängige CS 80913808, welches den Fehler ausgelöst hat. Auf der Autobahn existiert mittlerweile eine schmale "Baustellen-Leitplanke" zwischen den Fahrspuren, die bei Bedarf innert zwei, drei Stunden wieder entfernt werden kann. Ich bin mir daher nicht sicher ob die Änderung mit der fixen Aufteilung in dieser Form korrekt ist und hab gehofft, du hast damit mehr Routine. Die vorher vorhandenen change:lanes-Attribute (Spurwechsel-Vorschriften/-Verbote) schienen mir passender. Sorry, für die Aufruhr und Grüsse.
-ckb- (2020-02-15 20:15:23+00:00): Als Aufruhr würde ich es nicht bezeichnen ;) !

Wie schon gesagt: betreffend lanes usw. bin ich absolut unwissend und da kann ich dir nicht weiterhelfen. Wenn sich aus der baulichen Gegebenheit vor Ort herausstellt, dass es sich dann um zwei baulich getrennte Straßen/Fahrbahnen handelt, dann finde ich zwei verschiedene Linien sinnvoll. Aber da ich die Situation vor Ort nicht kenne, will ich da kein Urteil sprechen ;) .

Am besten einmal fragen was kds_ch darüber denkt bzw. wie er argumentiert.

PS: ich nehme diese Diskussion jetzt dann zum Anlass mich einmal zur Thematik "lanes" einzulesen :)

lg
Luzandro (2020-02-16 10:05:01+00:00): Hallo,

dir dürfte hier ein Fehler unterlaufen sein, denn das Attribut "graben=Graben" ergibt keinen Sinn. Was wolltest du damit ausdrücken?
Ohne diesem zusätzlichen Attribut ist die Acker-Fläche redundant, da sie schon in einer größeren enthalten ist
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157266797

LG Andreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80966002
archie (2020-02-13 17:23:55+00:00): Hi, you have not been active for quite some years, Welcome back! What's the meaning of this edit?
SomeoneElse (2020-02-14 20:23:29+00:00): Hello Bluedabadee,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here - I wonder if you can help.  We've had some questions about recent edits in Sweden like this (there have been lots of them).  What's odd in your case is that your last edits were all 3 years ago in Cottingham in England.
Would it be possible to let us know a bit more about this edit - either comment here or email us at data@osmfoundation.org.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
BCNorwich (2020-02-15 13:05:43+00:00): Hi,
Sorry to trouble you but I think this changeset has somehow orthogonalised Way: Lonsdale (697650023) (a natural=valley). Please see here:- https://tinyurl.com/uzkv2y8
I can usually work out how to revert this situation but this one has me baffled, reverting the whole changeset does not revert that particular way. Could you have a look please.

Regards Bernard.
dudone (2020-02-15 13:25:47+00:00): Hi
Oh Dear.  It looks like I must have had this selected when I was orthogonalising a building.  I have also tried downloading a reverted changeset but it remains the same.

I must admit I wasn't looking for this feature as there aren't many valleys mapped in the Peak District.  I cannot find a rendering of it so try and do a copy.

I assume I will just have to draw the way again along what I think is the valley bottom from bing imagery.  It doesn't look to have many data points so I would assume it is a "sweeping brush" that has been used.

If you have any advice on what to do, this would be appreciated before I just redraw it as best I can.

Kind Regards

Dudley
BCNorwich (2020-02-15 15:31:11+00:00): Hello Dudley,
I've just spent an hour or so trying to get the original way displayed, then getting it into JOSM, then working it into a layer to upload.
It's not reverted but drawn again from the original data. A drawn out process that I now don't know exactly how I did it.
Regards Bernard.
dudone (2020-02-15 18:21:04+00:00): Hi Bernard
Many thanks for correcting this mistake.  I will try and be more careful in future.

Kind Regards

Dudley
mariotomo (2020-02-15 16:04:08+00:00): hola.  mira que la tienda Aizpurua ya la habías puesta en la zona.  tú mismo.
darksh1ne (2020-06-23 10:08:08+00:00): добрый день. Спасибо за маппинг этих сёл. У меня вопрос: зачем были удалены треки в районе реки и карьера? https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=80966578

Все удаленные объекты есть на местности. Если их не видно зимой, не значит, что их нет летом. Я откатываю эти изменения.
Atakua (2020-02-13 17:28:50+00:00): Hej! Välkommen till OSM och tack för ditt bidrag.
eggie (2020-02-13 17:00:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-13 17:38:34+00:00): Eigenlijk dus building=office
viloan (2020-02-13 16:36:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2020-02-13 17:51:43+00:00): Dag beewee.. Tip.. Je kunt het best deze naam op de adresnode nr 20 taggen en niet op het gebouw zelf.
Er zit ook een artsenpraktijk dus dan ook de tag amenity=doctors  Dat levert dan ook direct een symbool op.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-13 17:52:59+00:00): Eigenlijk een lastige.. er zitten zoveel disciplines..
MikeN (2020-02-14 02:41:11+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the buildings!  Normally the building will not have a name unless it is special, such as the "Keowee Care Admin Building" or the name is posted on the building itself.   If these are different neighborhoods, an area is drawn around the neighborhood and the entire subdivision is given the name, along with residential landuse.
GinaroZ (2020-02-13 17:03:20+00:00): I doubt this is scree https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411832336 - and please just move the wind turbine node next time instead of creating a new one
Klaus Schwer (2020-02-13 23:04:51+00:00): Hi Ginaro,

I am German and was not sure about how to tag it. In my language "scrub" would consist of larger bushes.
How would you call such a landuse? Obviously scree means something else in English – sorry for that.

Yours sincerely,
Klaus
GinaroZ (2020-02-21 14:45:31+00:00): It is difficult to tell what the landuse is from the aerial imagery.
It is definitely not scree though, so I have changed it to scrub :)
jomapefe (2020-02-14 20:11:23+00:00): ¿No , se puede crear una etiqueta nueva?
jomapefe (2020-02-14 20:11:58+00:00): Las que hay no me sirven