piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Stefan@MUC (2021-06-03 19:36:32+00:00): Was ist an der Description und Note von Jonathan Grundmann in Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367800762/ falsch? Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung der ursprünglichen Inhalte.
user_2066394 (2021-06-03 19:59:20+00:00): fix Tagging, very long name/description/note, Quelle war #osmi
Stefan@MUC (2021-06-04 11:30:46+00:00): Kannst du bitte in vollständigen deutschen Sätzen antworten? Ich verstehe nicht, was du mir sagen willst.
user_2066394 (2021-06-04 11:35:04+00:00): OSM Inspector ist dir ein Begriff?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
Unterrubrik Tagging, dort dann
very long name/description/note
Stefan@MUC (2021-06-04 11:50:52+00:00): Das erklärt, wie du den Node gefunden hast. Das erklärt aber nicht, was denn nun an der Information falsch war - das ist meine ursprüngliche Frage. Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description darf die Description bis zu drei Sätze umfassen. Der von dir entfernte Text war ein und eineinhalb Sätze.
user_2066394 (2021-06-04 11:53:51+00:00): "Längere Informationen sollten per Referenz zu einer Webseite oder Wikipedia bereitgestellt werden."
Stefan@MUC (2021-06-04 11:58:36+00:00): Richtig, eine Information länger als drei Sätze soll anderweitig bereit gestellt werden. Die eingetragene Information war aber nicht mal halb so lang wie die Maximallänge - und sie hätte auch gekürzt statt komplett entfernt werden können. Ich bitte also um Wiederherstellung der Einträge.
user_2066394 (2021-06-04 12:00:31+00:00): Gut, dann holen wir zurück.
dieterdreist (2021-06-05 13:42:00+00:00): +1 für revert. Die Inspector Karten sind ja super, aber nicht immer ist alles falsch was dort hervorgehoben wird. Die maximale Länge von description tags wird über die API m.E. ausreichend limitiert.
dieterdreist (2021-06-05 13:44:52+00:00): keine description ist sicherlich schlechter als eine zutreffende die etwas länger ist (aber noch im 255 Zeichen (bzw. etwas weniger wegen Sonderzeichen) limit bleibt)
user_2066394 (2021-06-05 14:44:03+00:00): Im zweiten Blick war die Bearbeitung tatsächlich eher fragwürdig. Ich setz das mal zurück.
Stefan@MUC (2021-06-05 17:49:12+00:00): Vielen Dank! Ja, bei Bedarf kann man ja kürzen bzw. verfeinern - aber ganz ohne inhaltlichen Grund anzugeben einfach zu löschen ist schlecht.
philippec (2020-12-17 10:43:55+00:00): Minderhout aed, was de positie niet precies ?
Hoe hebt u het verbeterd ?
philippec (2020-12-19 19:54:12+00:00): Gebruik dan zeker het GRB om het juist te zetten.
pyrog (2020-12-18 17:51:21+00:00): Bonsoir Gérald

Merci de rajouter les n° de rue :)

Mais il vaut mieux le mettre sur un nœud ou se trouve réellement la plaque (entrée, boite aux lettres…)

Cordialement,
Yves
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95965999
Reeniz (2020-12-17 01:34:06+00:00): Source?
MxxCon (2020-12-17 04:28:17+00:00): Hi. Please consider submitting your edits as smaller changesets, so that if there's ever some mistake that needs to be undone, only that part of your edit would be affected. Additionally, it makes it easier to figure out what exactly your changes did. Rather than a bunch of different edits to buildings and roads all over the place grouped into one big changeset.
Also when adding business POI, perhaps consider putting it at the business' entrance rather than middle of a building its in. Makes it easier for people to figure out where exactly they have to go..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95966026
Chronoshift (2020-12-19 06:37:44+00:00): Hey, I just saw your comment now. Sorry about that, I will make my changes smaller next time.
user_5359 (2020-12-17 04:40:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
philippec (2020-12-19 19:50:59+00:00): Open bare bibliotheek hoogstratem

Gelieve juist te schrijven.
Thierry1030 (2021-08-01 15:44:50+00:00): this part is registered as 'Rue de Hal - Hallestraat' while the rest of this long street is called 'Bd de la Deuxième Armée Britannique' ... isn't that an error?
bxl-forever (2021-08-01 19:05:33+00:00): Hello,

It depends what kind of error we are talking about.

I bet the error is when municipalities have a long street and give it a different name for the part in the middle, this is certainly confusing for everyone.

But OSM data looks correct to me: the name of the ways matches UrbIS reference maps and it apparently matches street signs too.
Thierry1030 (2021-08-01 20:48:46+00:00): ok, thanks for the explanation!
culipabe (2021-02-20 19:14:51+00:00): @fixme Haltestelle Christianstraße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8235914433): Laut Aushang (seit Dez 2019) halten hier an Schultagen zwischen 13:07 und 13:20 die Linien 9654, 9613 und 9614 nach Weilheim, Großweil bzw. Bernried. Entsprechende Abfragen auf reiseauskunft.bahn.de zeigen, dass das wohl immer noch aktuell ist.
b-jazz (2020-12-19 18:59:46+00:00): Hey there Brody. Thanks for contributing to OSM. Your changes are appreciated by those of us in the community and the many others that won't even realize that work people like you have put in.

I wanted to correct a mapping thing that I've seen you do in a couple of places though so that the mistake doesn't continue. If you look at a cul-de-sac (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885699737 for instance) there is only one cul-de-sac there and you have made each driveway connecting to that cul-de-sac it's own cul-de-sac, which is incorrect. There should only be one cul-de-sac node at the center. And the road shouldn't draw a loop around it since there isn't anything physically on the ground that would force that path. The way it was originally drawn was correct (though I'm not sure the focal node was actually labelled a cul-de-sac as it should be).

Would you like to clean this up yourself or leave others like myself to do it for you? I'm happy either way.
voschix (2023-10-28 17:56:47+00:00): What is the source of this data?
gscholz (2021-01-24 08:33:59+00:00): Hi Skinine,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations for Imbuia and Ituporanga:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-49.48110&lat=-27.47312&zoom=12

Can you please fix this?

As I see, you are using ID as OSM editor, I strongly recommend to switch to JOSM if you are going to edit relations. JOSM shows error messages when you try to upload messy relations.

Kind regards
Guido
user_5359 (2020-12-17 04:48:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add more information! Two examples:
https://www.osm.org/way/688256725/ : Why has this building two names or exist there two business (which type)?
https://www.osm.org/way/686550275: the key restaurant (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:restaurant?uselang=de) needs an additional key (like tourism=hotel). If you want describe a restaurant please use amenity=restaurant.
MKnight (2020-12-17 09:57:47+00:00): Moin, willkommen bei OSM.

Namen sollten auch wirklich einer Benamung entsprechen, ich habe sie wieder entfernt.

Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Alex_457 (2020-12-20 13:30:20+00:00): Hi, I'm going to remove the name from this road. The road does not have a name and names should not be used to describe things. The description: tag should be used for that. See the wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
ivanbranco (2020-12-17 12:35:52+00:00): Ciao DelvecchioSimone12 5 96,

ti avevo già risposto al tuo primo changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95739795) ma non mi hai risposto, noto che stai continuando a modificare i nomi delle vie mettendole in minuscolo quando devono essere tenute in maiuscolo (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions). Posso chiederti poi perché hai tolto il tag building a questo edificio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521066558 ?
felipeeugenio (2020-12-17 12:21:33+00:00): Estimado. Buenisimas las ediciones. Sin embargo por favor seguir las guías de la wiki para los nombres de los caminos, ya que está usando nombres genéricos.
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name)

está invitado a la comunidad en el chat de Telegram si desea mayor información y aclarar dudas (https://t.me/OSMcl).
Saludos cordiales
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95968222
trichocereus (2020-12-17 13:53:36+00:00): Listo, tags corregidos segun sugerencia de wiki de no poner nombres si no existen.
felipeeugenio (2020-12-17 13:56:12+00:00): Buenisimo, gracias por sus aportes.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:19:31+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:19:19+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
user_5359 (2020-12-17 19:46:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question tyo your entires: What ist the meaning of the tag geobc=yes?
Evan_bcgov (2020-12-17 21:10:44+00:00): It was for a group activity we were doing. We put the tag in so that we could see how many buildings we edited/created.
user_5359 (2020-12-18 04:20:44+00:00): Please don’t do it. Did you know https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Evan_bcgov ?
ironmatic1 (2021-01-15 23:13:34+00:00): Did you really delete all the lines marking abandoned/disused RR right of way/track? The abandoned tag is meant to mark out where railway track once was if the right of way is still visible.
Natfoot (2021-07-18 05:40:28+00:00): Hi there ironmatic,
I messaged you through Open Street Map. If you login and check your messages you will see my message. I am an active railroad contributor and can answer any of your question. Check my profile for other resources.
Frans S (2020-12-19 11:18:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for  mapping here.
A question. Why did you add layer=1 to a road? This tag is to be used at f.e. a bridge crossing a river to indicate that it passed the water on a higher level and not crossed the waterbody itself as a ford.
Your mappings themselves are rather accurate but lacks the squaring.
Also do not follow the tree lines where a building is partly hidden by trees. Extrapolate the roofline.
I send you a PM with more mapping info.
Best regards and keep mapping
abakus_uploader (2020-12-17 23:31:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Kovoschiz (2020-12-17 03:08:33+00:00): Need to know what kind of construction works, as in whether this section will be permanently closed. OSM doesn't record "temporary" (eg <3 months) events directly.
MEMEME_wong (2020-12-17 03:13:26+00:00): I think is permanently closed. As the path became part of private land now, with gate stopping people from entry. The private land is not showing up on Google Satellite image now.
mariotomo (2020-12-22 18:38:29+00:00): bonjour.  j'ai un doute, j'ai utilisé Maxar comme base, et, puisque on manque d'alignement GPS, je l'ai utilisé aussi pour la position des éléments. peut être une idée, de mentioner les valeurs pour aligner les différents chartes bases (Esri/Maxar/Bing).
vetah MOHAMED EL MOCTAR (2020-12-22 22:41:46+00:00): Veillez utiliser images d'ESRI, Merci pour la contribution
Dimacn (2020-12-17 05:34:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. 1. Старайтесь не удалять существующие объекты, а редактировать их до актуального. Можно даже превращать один тип полигона в другой. 2. Чтобы отмеченные полигоном здания имели реальные размеры и пропорции, используйте пожалуйста следующий приём. Обрисовываете крышу, выравниваете прямые углы командой, потом сдвигаете полигон на фундамент.
user_5239402 (2020-12-17 03:34:47+00:00): 안녕하세요 바뀜집합의 글을 꼭 적어주시기 바랍니다. 왜냐하면 다른 지도 작성자가 귀하가 한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있도록 해주는 예의 입니다. 변경 세트 주석을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 한 일과 그 이유가 당신의 일이 아니다"라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을하고있는 프로젝트에 적합하지 않습니다!
오해를 피하고 실수를 신속하게 수정하기 위해 – "Bing에서 몇 집을 추적했습니다"라는 변경 집합 주석이있는 편집이 50 개의 식당을 삭제하면 이것이 실수 였음이 분명한 반면 "음식점 제거 지난주 설문 조사에서 문을 닫은 것으로 나타났습니다. "는 정당한 이유로 이러한 식당을 삭제하려는 의도가 있음을 분명히 보여줍니다.
왜 당신이 무엇을했고 당신의 출처가 무엇이 었는지 설명함으로써 편집의 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁 을 방지 합니다.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-17 14:56:38+00:00): Dzięki za domapowanie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885748389 - miałeś zswój ślad czy z Stravy czy skąd to miałeś?
eBin (2020-12-17 15:15:56+00:00): Z osm.org, też jest trochę śladów
nevw (2020-12-17 10:50:02+00:00): Hi
I notice the Casa Nostra Motel is listed as being on Nebo Road but Nebo Road is not one of the streets that are adjacent to it on the OSM
TheSwavu (2020-12-18 10:49:06+00:00): According to the QLD Base Map the street out front is called Nebo Rd. Appears that the problem is the road name (and duplicate tagging of the motel).
nevw (2020-12-18 23:56:08+00:00): The Bruce Highway through Mackay has old_name as Broadsound Road. 
The Basemap has part of the Bruce Highway through Mackay as Broadsound Road and part as Nebo Road.
I opted to add alt_name=Nebo Road as depicted in the Basemap and left the old_name and name tags as is.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-18 21:16:44+00:00): Please don't mistag roads for any reason.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Problematic_mapping/golf
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-18 21:17:36+00:00): wrong changeset/user probably.
sorry
silakshm (2022-02-22 09:05:36+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing the feedback. Please feel free to report such errors.

I'm looking forward to learn more from you. Thank you again, always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
silakshm
blackboxlogic (2020-12-25 23:34:36+00:00): FYI you deleted "Harvest Lane" (WAY: 826293287) and put "Dawe Road" (WAY: 885770421) in its place, but this is definitely Harvest Lane. I've fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95978788
sunaman (2020-12-29 03:19:10+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for informing about this area, Apologies for the wrong addition of road name. Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy Mapping!

Regards,
sunaman.
Intobesa (2020-12-17 06:09:20+00:00): This is a temple for the monks that I am
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:12:12+00:00): Some of the service roads added have an access of value of "customers`" (notice the backtick `). This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
iggujja (2021-02-16 09:43:11+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for looking into the edit, I've made the necessary changes in the changeset(99346586). Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
iggujja.
opencarpatia (2020-12-29 01:28:00+00:00): Добрий день. Прошу негайно припинити бездумно вности зміни. Ваші зміни виглядають як вандалізм. Виправте їх негано, поки вони не потрапили з періодичними оновленнями людям на навігатори! Зробіть це перед тим як продовжувати вносити будь які нові зміни.

(1) Тут до прикладу нема і не може бути ніякого броду!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8236543175/history

(2) А ТУТ ПРОШУ НЕГАЙНО ПОВЕРНУТИ МІЙ ВНЕСОК СТОСОВНО ЯКОСТІ ПОКРИТТЯ ДОРОГИ ЯКИЙ ВИ ВИДАЛИЛИ:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885776284/history

(3) Даний відрізок дороги не є просто "ВУЛИЦЕЮ", він є частиною дороги рівня "TERTIARY". Тому ви не можете понижувати його статус до рівня "ВУЛИЦЯ"!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885776284/history

(4) Якість дороги яку ви тут вказали як "horrible" є повним абсурдом. Цей участов був перевірений мною позавчора - там лежить асфальт ХОРОШОГО рівня якості.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/872880305/history
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2020-12-29 18:07:17+00:00): Why did you delete so many areas on the map?
Frans S (2020-12-17 10:01:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. Your mappings are not that accurate and squared as required .
Please be more accurate and square each rectangular building.
I copy you a document on a PM with more info
Best regards and keep mapping
Jasmine Ahn (2020-12-17 10:17:17+00:00): Okay thank you, I will be using Q and further read up on how to map taller buildings
Frans S (2020-12-19 09:27:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Just a remark. Please let nodes of buildings not snap to other features like roads. 
See also the Issues on the triangle in iDeditor
Best regards and keep mapping
zorglubu (2020-12-17 21:03:13+00:00): Bonjour, merci d'avoir participé à l'amélioration de la carte et bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap.
Surtout continuez :-)
timmito (2020-12-17 15:04:07+00:00): Hallo myway, wie lautet denn die Hausnummer? Wenn die Hausnummer 8-10 lautet, dann sollte es auch so eingetragen sein. OpenStreetMap ist eine Datenbank mit Geoinformationen, wie diese angezeigt werden, hängt von der jeweiligen Karte ab. In der Standardkarte wird keine Hausnummer angezeigt, da stattdessen der Name des Gebäudes angezeigt wird.
zorglubu (2020-12-17 21:00:01+00:00): Bonjour et merci d'avoir contribué à améliorer la carte. Bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap !
seewäldler (2020-12-17 21:05:05+00:00): Hallo Rolani_Design
hier scheint ein bischen etwas schief gelaufen zu sein: Eine Fläche ist 3 Meter hoch, der Verkaufsautomat ist aus dem Haus an eine Flächenumrandung geklebt die gleichzeitig shop, Apfelplantage und Gebäude ist, Flächen haben Namen anstatt ihr Verwendungszweck. Schaust du dir das noch einmal an?
jalaska (2021-02-16 15:30:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding to the trail network. However, please check the OSM Wiki for guidelines on who to add routes to the map. If they (for example a cycling way) are running along an already existing road, you do not "draw" another segment for the cycleway along the road, but add this as a tag to the road or as a route itself, running along this road for part of the whole cycleway. Also note that you should avoid snapping your ways to powerlines for example. If you have questions, don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks and happy mapping!
kapazao (2022-01-24 07:36:48+00:00): Hola, ¿puedes dar información o alguna referencia sobre esta gasolinera (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885800060)?
Supongo que será para las máquinas quitanieves o vehículos de la estación, no una gasolinera para que la gente en general reposte.
Es necesario detallar más esto.
Un saludo
DD1GJ (2020-12-17 10:53:53+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Die Änderungen haben Auswirkungen auf Kartenwerke von hoher Qualität, Leider entsprechen die Einträge nicht so ganz den Geplogenheiten. Auf einer Apfalplantage ist bestimmt keine Hühnerzucht und kein Zoo-Fachgeschäft. Von dem "Campingplatz" ist auf den aktuellen Luftbildern nichts zu sehen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Für private Kartenspielereien gibt es https://umap.openstreetmap.de/de/
tesp (2020-12-18 12:25:56+00:00): Hei, voisitko olla muuttamatta teiden käyttöoikeuksia tällä tavalla? Nyt tie näyttää suljetulta (access=no yleensä tarkoittaa suljettua tietä) ja pyöräily ei kartan mukaan ole sallittua, mikä ei vastaa todellisuutta.
aharvey (2020-12-22 03:57:23+00:00): That name was already added as alt_name. I've seen schools with multiple signs some say Primary some say Public School so there is no right answer. If you want to swap this based on a survey that's fine, but best to keep the other name as alt_name and not have both name and alt_name the same.
aharvey (2020-12-22 03:57:49+00:00): PS. Could you point me to this map roulette challenge, I couldn't find it.
aharvey (2020-12-22 04:09:47+00:00): found it https://maproulette.org/challenge/15439 not sure why it didn't come up in searches
radiotrefoil (2020-12-22 04:10:22+00:00): Whoops, yeah that was a mistake. I'll fix it. The challenge id is 15439.
Frans S (2020-12-19 12:57:48+00:00): Hello. . Thanks for mapping here 
I reviewed your mappings and have some remarks.
Please be more accurate in your mappings and square all rectangular buildings. 
You overlooked some buildings. (brown roof)
See also the info I send you by another PM
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2020-12-17 08:51:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
OrDal (2020-12-17 10:58:01+00:00): Hi.
Why have you changed all these villages to towns? Beit Inan, Qattana, Beddu, Bir Nabala, Beit Hanina: all these places are villages not towns.
Also, Kafr Aqeb is praticly part of jerusalem, and you indtend to map it separatly it should be village, not town.
Also, Beit Hanina  in Jerusalem is not called "the new". this should maybe be under description tag. The same for village of Beit Hanina: "The original" should be under description tag, not part of the name.
OrDal (2020-12-17 10:59:30+00:00): *if you intend
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-17 12:20:40+00:00): oh, ok so, I was following the attached map.

But then,  you are correct, light blue "Type C" is practically a village. I was going with the assumption that they're towns. But as I reviewed Rafah and Khun Yunis, I realized that. 

With regards to Beit Hanun, that attached 2019 map shows "Beit Hanun Al-Balad", and I'm pretty sure "Beit Hanun Al-Jadid is within J-1, ie Jlm municipality. So it seemed to me that they're shown differently, officially. 

Kafr Aqab, I wonder why it's not in J-1. On the one hand it's in Jerusalem municipality.  On the other,  it's on the Ranallah side of Qandaliya checkpoint, and practically separate from Jerusalem.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-17 12:24:30+00:00): *qalandiya
LySioS (2021-07-05 19:53:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez apporté une modification au chemin Bas de Margelet. Il y a un conflit car le chemin est maintenant en doublon.
De plus, vous avez utilisé le tag highway=residential alors que ce n'est pas approprié à cet endroit.
Pouvez-vous corriger vos modifications.

Cordialement,
L
SiiG (2021-07-06 10:24:07+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces vérifications.
Nous avons corrigé la valeur du paramètre "higway".
Par contre, nous ne constatons aucun doublon. Il existe bien, sur la commune de Gaujac, une voie nommée CHEMIN DE MARGELET et une voie nommée CHEMIN BAS DE MARGELET (cf. http://carto.siig.fr/adresse).
Bien cordialement.
LySioS (2021-07-06 12:00:48+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour la correction. Le doublon est en fait 2 portions de voies qui se superposent : voici les liens des deux voies en question :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753143610#map=16/44.0826/4.5576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885812916#map=18/44.08422/4.55850
Comme ils ont 2 valeurs highways différentes, je vous laisse le corriger avec la bonne.

De plus, le chemin de Margelet est toujours en residential.

Cordialement,
SiiG (2021-07-06 12:19:04+00:00): La correction a été apportée. Le chemin n'est plus dupliqué. Et nous avions pourtant bien modifié la valeur du paramètre "highway". Peut-être faut il un temps de temporisation pour que la mise à jour soit prise en compte sur le serveur OSM ?
LySioS (2021-07-07 20:51:50+00:00): Rebonjour,
La base de donnée OSM se met à jour dès l'envoi des modifications. Par contre, la génération des tuiles (le rendu visuel) met plus de temps à se faire.
Vous avez bien modifié le highway du chemin BAS de Margelet, mais la valeur du "chemin de Margelet" est toujours résidential.
SiiG (2021-07-08 07:01:15+00:00): Rebonjour,
La valeur du Chemin de Margelet est "résidential" car deux entrées de propriétés sont numérotées sur ce chemin : les n° 901 et 1505.
LySioS (2021-07-15 11:46:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne partage pas votre point de vue sur la valeur residential. Je soumets ça à d'autres avis sur le forum de manière à être sûr de bien qualifier ce chemin.
Bonne journée