piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_1566574 (2020-01-13 20:12:33+00:00): J'ai du avoir une erreur sur Osmose alors que je débutais (et j'ignorais cette norme). Ce sera corrigé, merci.

(Dans la même logique, on ne dit pas non plus « Mairie de Pontarlier » ?)
Truchin (2020-01-14 07:45:31+00:00): Vi.
Pour les mairies, c'est un peu différent je crois. Le nom correspond plutôt à ce qui est inscrit sur le fronton. D'ailleurs, quelques fois la mairie s'appelle "Hôtel de ville".

Thomas
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:11:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5852249712/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
mueschel (2018-09-02 17:47:16+00:00): "place = peninsula" is used 200 times, why not to use this quite common tag instead of a new one 'locality:type' is not used in any other place.

Jan
Essin (2018-09-21 17:25:52+00:00): I just reverted to a previous tagging without considering how established it was, but you're right, place=peninsula is a better syntax. I've changed it again.
ma-rt-in (2018-08-24 08:31:18+00:00): siehe CS 61939767
Minh Nguyen (2018-08-23 21:37:42+00:00): Technically, “Huỳnh Phi Long” is a homophonic translation, not a calque. Apologies for the mixup.
AlaskaDave (2018-09-20 10:14:01+00:00): Hi,
I'm interested in why you created a dual carriageway for the Richardson Hwy in Delta Junction. IIRC, it is not divided; the lanes are only separated by yellow lines.

AlaskaDave
sinspawn (2018-09-20 15:46:02+00:00): Hi Dave,

Thanks for the inquiry.  I would like to preface my answer with that I am new to OSM and I am happy make adjustments if I have erred.

I changed the highway because it is a 5 lane road and it didn't seem like a single line did it justice.  

When I find the time, I am trying to make improvements to my town on OSM as it looks kind of bleak.

But please, if I did that incorrectly let me know as I will change it back.  I thought I was doing it correctly when I made the change.

Thanks.

Sinspawn
AlaskaDave (2018-09-21 00:24:29+00:00): First off, let me welcome you to OSM. We desperately need more OSMers in Alaska and I was happy to notice some other stuff you have mapped. Hetting back to the question at hand:

There is some precedent for tagging the way you chose to do it but generally, if a highway doesn't have a divider, a grass strip or concrete barrier of some sort then it is not a dual carriageway. Google shows that section of the Richardson as a dual carriageway but I think that's incorrect.

I would tag it as lanes=5, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=2, turn:lanes:forward=left (or backward). The forward or backward refers to the direction the OSM way is drawn.

I do a ton of work in Alaska (I live in Homer during the summer, and Thailand in the winter), and it's good to see someone else working in the state I love.

If you want me to help change that section to use the lanes scenario, let me know and I will do that.

Cheers,
Dave
AlaskaDave (2018-09-23 02:24:13+00:00): Hi again,
After reviewing the newest imagery, I do not see any section having 5 lanes in Delta Junction. There are short sections of dual carriageway on both Alaska & Rich Hwys where they meet south of the main run through town but those are very short, and are legitimately tagged the way they are. But just north of that junction the two highways merge into one and it becomes a 4-lane highway through town. The tagging then should be lanes=4, lanes:backward=2, lanes:forward=2
TheSolarGuy (2018-09-13 17:49:20+00:00): Oh now, I don't know what I've done else!
Rostyslav_ua (2019-02-21 11:54:41+00:00): Прохання не розміщати рекламу на загально доступних стоянках!
Pikse (2018-10-23 07:29:40+00:00): This changes place type "hamlet" to "village" for Viti and Vääna-Jõesuu. This makes tagging and display of different types of settlements in Estonia inconsistent (see comment for changeset 59667566). I think this should be changed back to "hamlet". The same about Suurupi (n110266371).
viloan (2018-08-23 23:11:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
TreeTracks (2021-06-27 07:55:51+00:00): Hi David, lovely mapping around Armidale! I've added the amenity=toilets tag to a suite of buildings that you tagged as building=toilets in Armidale (and one in Dunedoo) as, without the amenity=toilets tag they do not display the toilets icon in OpenStreetMap. All other toilets in NSW have the amenity tag too. However, I haven't added one to this toilet at Harris Park as I wasn't sure if you meant to indicate that the toilet was now disused. It has the tags: building=toilets and disused:amenity=toilets. If it's still open it would be good to remove the disused:amenity tag. Thanks for your fantastic mapping, it's a pleasure to see Armidale in such detail in OSM.
aharvey (2018-09-09 03:51:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!

Regarding this change of name from "Access Trail" to "Barrenjoey Lighthouse Track", I added "Access Trail" as that is what the path was signposted as when I visited. Where did you find the new name?
MargaretRDonald (2018-09-19 03:01:13+00:00): It is the name given by the locals (of which I am one). In fact it is the original tramway track laid for a royal visit (Edward?) early in the 20 th century, which then became the 4-wheel drive access track for the lighthouse men and their families, and now after much money could be traversed by any vehicle, but only national parks vehicles are permitted.
aharvey (2018-09-19 03:09:51+00:00): Thanks for the reply.

I've ensured Access Trail (as signposted) is still preset by placing it in the alt_name tag.
MargaretRDonald (2018-09-19 03:20:11+00:00): Excellent (and thanks for caring) It's Sydney's answer to Mt Fuji, a religious trek.
DannyMcD (2018-08-24 23:12:41+00:00): Hi Heather,
Could you avoid deleting the railway=abandoned tag?  It is still applicable for former rail lines like this one.  The combination of railway=abandoned and highway=path is a good way to search for rail trails.
SimonPoole (2018-09-05 09:42:17+00:00): Reverted in #62305214 vandalism removal
SimonPoole (2018-09-05 09:41:36+00:00): Reverted in #62305197 vandalism removal
SimonPoole (2018-09-05 09:40:58+00:00): Reverted in #62305172 vandalism removal
SimonPoole (2018-09-05 09:39:43+00:00): Reverted in #62305148 vandalism removal
SimonPoole (2018-09-05 09:39:08+00:00): Reverted in #62305109 vandalism removal
SimonPoole (2018-09-05 09:38:16+00:00): Reverted in #62305092 vandalism removal
jc86035 (2018-08-24 03:49:04+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've moved the new object to its correct position and made some other changes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61938507).
DUGA (2022-07-24 15:51:26+00:00): What kind of shop is there?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5852580674#map=19/40.59612/-76.40974
BCNorwich (2018-08-25 17:44:08+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you've tested how to add things to the live worldwide OSM database. This is a database from which folk all over the world render all sorts of maps including for emergency purposes. Thus it is regarded as incorrect to add fiction, there are other places for fiction and testing.

Fortunately I noticed that your additions were fiction and have removed them. No harm done. 

If you need help adding features to OSM please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Colin Smale (2018-08-25 20:43:17+00:00): The denomination should be Roman Catholic, as tagged in the node (which you deleted). Please be careful not to lose information!
Colin Smale (2018-08-25 11:29:08+00:00): What makes you think that it can't be both a riverbank and part of the coastline at the same time? I think both are correct here. It is indisputably a riverbank, and by the usual definition (tidal high water mark) it is also part of the coastline. They are different concepts, and I think you misunderstand the definition of coastline. Please undo these edits.
keithonearth (2018-08-28 02:53:44+00:00): The ways that were traded as `waterway=riverbank` did not trace the same outline, nor were they continuous with each other, just random sections of water. They did not even trace the bank, for the most part, just random mid river areas. 

There is no reason for this river to be traced as seashore, with random sections to be additionally traced as riverbank.

Even if the river was acutely mapped with both riverbank and coastline ways this would break the "one feature, one OSM element" approach.

I'm quite confident that this edit is an improvement.
Colin Smale (2018-08-28 07:27:44+00:00): Hi Keith, thanks for your reaction. I should have made it clearer in my first comment that it's the coastline that is the problem, not the riverbank. If you have tidied up the riverbank tagging, that's great, and thanks for that. But you have unilaterally adopted a different paradigm regarding the coastline in a tidal river.
Your coastline cuts across the mouth, whereas in most cases the convention in the UK is that the coastline continues to the tidal limit, which in this case is Totnes Wier. I know it is a bit of a controversial subject, but a change like this should really be discussed, especially when you are a visitor from another continent! The Dart is now out of step with other rivers in the area (check out the Tamar, Exe, Teign) although I admit Salcombe Harbour is also shorted. Whether your coastline edit is an "improvement" or not, is subjective...
keithonearth (2018-08-29 16:39:07+00:00): When I said that I was confident that this edit was an improvement, I was referring specificity to this changeset this discussion area is for.

As for my edit that removed the coastline and added riverbank tags from the riverbank, I'd say the case isn't as clearcut, but I'll discuss that change its discussion area.
keithonearth (2019-03-20 07:37:08+00:00): It is probably worth pointing out that I posted a question on help.osm.org about this: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/65629/should-riverbanks-be-tagged-as-naturalcoastline
aharvey (2018-08-25 00:20:06+00:00): Hey I changed this to just cycleway=lane as I can see bike lanes on both sides at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=uYPm2IS5vAvhMykbyxRyrQ&focus=photo if it's changed since then (Map 2018) please say so.
jakecopp (2018-08-28 13:57:01+00:00): Thanks very much, I checked again today while cycling and that's right.
Larmax (2020-05-14 12:20:06+00:00): Mikä on toi cycleway Ropopolun kohdalla, joka ei johda mihinkään?
scratera (2018-08-24 21:00:22+00:00): sarebbe meglio shop=electrical
3vivekb (2018-09-02 19:30:27+00:00): Though it seems odd this import has many deletions, they are good deletions since the previous import added too many crossings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61939757
ma-rt-in (2018-08-24 08:31:05+00:00): Hallo,
schön das du einen EInstieg in JOSM machst. Jedoch ist mir bei deinen Änderungen aufgefallen, das du Gebäude löschst und sie dann versetzt neuzeichnest. Bitte tu dies nicht, sondern trenne vllt den Weg des Gebäude auf und zeichne ihn dann neu. Das hat den Vorteil das die Chronik erhalten bleibt, was sehr wichtig ist.
Warin61 (2018-08-25 07:47:58+00:00): Hi,
You are creating a number of errors..  for example in this change set 
Relation: RI Mangrove (8589561)
has an intersection between the multipologon ways ..
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.25738&lat=-27.65014&zoom=10&opacity=0.67

As I recall most of these errors are similar - ways crossing themselves.
utack (2019-01-31 23:27:15+00:00): Diese runde "Tonne" gehörte doch zum Gebäude?  
Oder hab ich mich da getäuscht
Ninjoh (2018-11-24 23:59:08+00:00): Hier ligt helemaal geen veerooster, toch? Ik ben hier redelijk bekend, en naar mijn weten ligt er over de hele lengte van deze dijk geen enkel veerooster, wel een paaltje, aan het begin richting Tolkamer.
jaap de vries (2018-11-25 11:17:05+00:00): Een tijdje terug aangemaakt omdat een nieuwe mapper uit Zevenaar dat aangaf en hier inderdaad een veerooster ligt.
Ninjoh (2018-11-25 14:49:42+00:00): Vreemd, ik zal als ik tijd heb eens even langs fietsen om te checken. Bedankt voor de info!
Ninjoh (2018-12-02 14:11:17+00:00): Volgens iemand anders die hier vlakbij woont lag hier een jaar of twee geleden inderdaad een veerooster, maar is dit inmiddels weggehaald. Heb zelf nog niet de tijd gevonden om even langs te rijden.
Fischkopp0815 (2018-08-24 08:13:47+00:00): Hallo, 
schön,dass Du hier Hausnummern einträgst. Leider hast Du nicht die zugehörige Straße in addr:street angegeben. addr:housenumber UND addr:street ist das Minimum für eine nutzbare Adresse. Kannst Du das noch ergänzen? Das gilt auch für Deine anderen Änderungen auf Nordstrand seit gestern
puma_86 (2018-08-24 09:20:54+00:00): Alles klar, ist erledigt ;-)
pyram (2018-08-24 08:27:53+00:00): Danke fürs korrigieren (ist mir etwas peinlich, dass ich hier das falsche "to" eingetragen hatte):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1433772
scratera (2018-08-24 21:04:11+00:00): va bene highway=path ma aggiungerei anche un sac_scale=alpine_hiking altrimenti potresti trovare gente che lo vuol fare con i mocassini....
vssms (2018-09-12 05:28:18+00:00): ;
agpath (2018-08-24 06:15:36+00:00): Changes in Hjärup. (Note was wrong)
Alecs01 (2018-08-24 07:14:16+00:00): Those are buildings, not "stadiums", please re-add the builing tag and delete the leisure one. One feature, one element https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element. Are they five stadiums there? If we got a single stadium, we should only have a single leisure=stadium object
stadiaarcadia (2018-08-24 08:29:08+00:00): Allright, I will change it. Is "stadium building" also fine? That option is also available.
stadiaarcadia (2018-08-24 08:33:20+00:00): I've re-added the building tags. You're right about this.
Alecs01 (2018-08-24 07:12:27+00:00): This is a duplication: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5853039355 please delete it
stadiaarcadia (2018-08-24 08:34:48+00:00): I removed it.
Baloo Uriza (2018-08-29 03:31:39+00:00): Seems like you removed this stadium's detail with a lower detailed version, mind moving back to what you had before you changed it, then collect the three grandstands as a relation for the stadium?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61941478
ToniE (2018-08-24 07:05:41+00:00): Hallo, und willkommen bei OSM.

ich habe ein paar Erweiterungen hinzugefügt:

shop=beverages, wodurch "Getränkemarkt" aus 'name' raus kann.

Der Orterer wird hier in der Gegend lediglich mit name="Orterer".

Viele Grüße und viel Spass noch
Toni
Warin61 (2018-10-04 01:14:47+00:00): Hi,

The Cascase Rock to MacLaren Point path overlays several roads .. not good. Are there 'tracks' or 'paths', are motor vehicles allowed along them or not??? 

In short .. don't overlay one thing with another where they are in fact the same at that point. 
If you want the route to show up then make a route relation and incorporate the segments into the route.
aharvey (2018-08-24 23:39:03+00:00): If the track exists on the ground, it should be in OSM. If it's not specifically designed for foot traffic, you can use the lower class highway=path or if it's specifically for bicycles use highway=cycleway.
Ben Carroll (2018-08-24 23:43:50+00:00): Yep - I get that, but given the nature of the 'track' with local kids working on it and coming down it at very high speed, I didn't think it was safe as many end-users of OSM data see foot paths and cycle paths as much the same.
aharvey (2018-08-25 00:07:43+00:00): I've reverted this to bring back the objects since you noted the path does actually exist on the ground. Likely you'll want to downgrade it to highway=path
SK53 (2021-11-12 19:07:07+00:00): Hmm, it would have been better to check with me. The footpath is closed ("gating order") not  open.
Mike Baggaley (2021-11-13 18:07:40+00:00): Hmm, perhaps you shouldn't have put foot=yes then. My change had no effect on the resultant access.
Tim Couwelier (2018-08-24 12:18:35+00:00): For the sake of completeness - the anonymous comment was mine.
mueschel (2018-08-29 06:45:39+00:00): Hi,
schau bitte mal nach diesem Knoten,  '21=1' ist wohl ein Fehler.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/291770980

Gruß, Jan
ma-rt-in (2018-08-29 08:23:50+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Ist korrigiert.
lg
mattchn (2018-09-09 20:45:19+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62434553 
This changeset breaks a lot of important trails.
frosm (2018-08-24 19:48:17+00:00): bonjour et bienvenu sur openstreetmap
je vous invite à expérimenter le tutoriel pour découvrir comment ajouter le tag décrivant que c'estune maison d'hôte.
ce serrait aussi une bonne chose d'ajouter un moyen de contact (site web, téléphone) et positionner l'élément au bon endroit car il se trouve pour le moment hors de tout batiment
Frans S (2018-09-26 13:36:35+00:00): Hi,  I am reviewing this task and noticed that you map buildings oversized. Please follow the outlines of a building as precise as possible
Thanks
abrensch (2018-08-25 06:17:04+00:00): Dass der Anschluss nach Süden noch highway=construction ist ist Absicht?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
abrensch (2018-08-28 06:24:16+00:00): Hab den Anschluss nach SÜden dann mal entsperrt
Jose Luis Infante (2018-08-24 13:06:15+00:00): Hola,
gracias por tus contribuciones, aunque lamento tener que echar atrás esta edición, ya que no se puede utilizar los datos de Google ni Google Maps (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F). 
Te recomiendo que a la hora de editar edificios utilices los datos del Catastro, que se pueden utilizar sin restricciones.
Para esto, cuando estás editando puedes elegir mostrar los datos del Catastro en el menú de opciones de la derecha del editor (y elegir Catastro).
Un saludo!
SK53 (2018-09-04 16:20:25+00:00): I'm afraid this is a huge mess. You have added a vast number of pedestrian highways in a stadium, which is incorrect and probably tagging for the renderer. These are presumably banks of seating. I doubt that you got this information from anywhere other than the website of the stadium or some other copyright source. Even a stadium hopper is not going to sit in every bank of seating. As others have said: your edit rate is too high for your level of understanding of some OSM concepts with the result that you are inadvertently removing good data and replacing it with data which may not be compatible with OSM. The very large number of edits may make life too hard to restore data you deleted and keep your edits. 

You obviously have a specific project in mind: as SomeoneElse has said you need to add something on your profile about a) your goals & project; and b) sources of information you are using.
bhousel (2018-09-04 17:07:33+00:00): FWIW, I think what stadiaarcadia did here is pretty great and I have no issue with it.  I agree it would be nice to say more about it's source.  But numbered seating sections just as public as things like numbered parking lots or numbered train platforms?  e.g. even if they take this information from the stadium's website, it seems ok for inclusion in OSM.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-04 17:36:59+00:00): Hi, the first row was already included. It was a pedestrian way already, probably because you can walk over the stairs at the lines. I added the missing second and third rows (with the numbers between 200 and 350). I saw that various other stadiums (look at the large Canadian stadiums for example) also used the lines this way, so it's probably okay. By the way, you can also see the lines at Bing.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-04 17:40:14+00:00): I am done with all my stadium edits by the way. I'm going to check all my edits for errors, most of my edits which contained errors have already been reverted/adapted. Please give me a little time to improve / revert some of my edits. Only a small amount of my edits still contain errors, I will fix those soon.
SK53 (2018-09-04 18:10:20+00:00): I have no problem with micromapping details of stadia, for instance adding numbered areas of seating/rows etc, but they are not routable pedestrian areas. I have changed these to stadium=seating (no idea if the tag is in use, but seems sensible, and keeps the information) and altered the name to ref. 

The polygons could be used with building:part to enable modelling of the stadium as a simple 3D building.

An aside for @bryanhousel: as I wrote this wikipage (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Section) some years ago I'm definitely in favour of the basic idea.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-04 18:25:54+00:00): Thanks bhousel and SK53 :)
SK53 (2018-09-04 19:13:19+00:00): I'm not sure of the  best way to map gangways & stairs in the stadium. Probably use highway=footway (not pedestrian) and highway=steps. If these are a large area use area:highway=footway or steps in conjunction with a routeable way (steps in particular may be wide with many handrails to provide safety from crushes. I would only map the actual circulation routes (not the way to individual seats. For internal circulation inside the stadium indoor=corridor etc. For much of this very detailed micromapping it may be sensible to use domain specific tags, e.g., stadium=*. The logically completion point is when all seats are mapped.
stadiaarcadia (2018-10-08 07:08:55+00:00): I've fixed stadium areas at the MetLife Stadium, but you've made those invisible now. It took me a lot of effort to fix those, I saw that same style at numerous other stadiums. Can you please make those squares/areas visible again?
SomeoneElse (2018-10-08 15:48:19+00:00): @stadiaarcadia - above you ask "Can you please make those squares/areas visible again?"  The answer is yes, but you're going to need to find a custom renderer to show the data.  There are 4 map styles visible on osm.org.  There's the "standard" one (which I presume that you're talking about), and also ones designed to show cycling, public transport and humanitarian features.  The standard map style is a general map style and is developed over at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/ .  It doesn't tend to show "micromapped" features of any sort; that's not really what it is for.  If you'd like some help creating a rendering that shows this data there are lots of people that can help, but we'd need to know a bit more about what it's for first (do you want map tiles for a "slippy" web map?  Some sort of vector tiles for use within a mobile phone app?  Something else?).
In https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619381259/history it looks like you tried to add these as pedestrian streets.  This was wrong - the areas concerned are surely _not_ pedestrian streets and shouldn't be mapped as such.  By the way, what was your source for the numbers here such as 327 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619381259/history ?  Under what licence was that source made available?
Best Regards,
Andy
stadiaarcadia (2018-10-08 17:55:46+00:00): I didn't start with those squares, I finished the missing ones. Somebody else started with the squares and the numbers, I've added the missing squares.

Can you also check this stadium:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=bmo%20field#map=19/43.63322/-79.41859

It's probably also wrong. Here the same: I didn't add those squares, I just added the missing ones.