piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigpoint (2015-10-30 13:34:37+00:00): I have reverted this change.

I suspect that the problem was with the app rather than OSM data. It is always worth checking routing issues using the routers available on the main osm site. OSRM for example did not have an issue with the bridge.

Are you using the lastest version of the app? Is all of your map data updated? 

I am a little surprised the app took you on a 20 mile detour if the bridge was an issue, as I would expect it to route through the village.

I have added tourism=wilderness_hut to the bothy, it is ok to map multiple things in the same changeset, but good practice to keep routing issues in separate to adding tourism features.

If you still have issues, let us know and we can try to get to the bottom of the problem.
Kelvin Hill (2015-10-30 09:32:19+00:00): This was the addition of Hinckley Road Cemetery.
Kelvin Hill (2015-10-30 09:33:36+00:00): This was the addition of the Solar Farm and resulting adjustment of the adjoining residential area.
Kelvin Hill (2015-10-30 09:34:39+00:00): Fine tuning of Solar Farm boundary.
Kelvin Hill (2015-10-30 09:35:20+00:00): Addition of new residential development area.
Kelvin Hill (2015-10-30 09:36:33+00:00): Addition of Virtual Trader business and amendment of church details.
trigpoint (2015-10-29 18:36:11+00:00): Please add meaningful changeset comments, this is the 6th with the same name and only the first involved Hinckley Road Cemetary.
Kelvin Hill (2015-10-30 09:18:05+00:00): Sorry, I clearly missed that part of the tutorial. I apologise unreservedly.
Kelvin Hill (2015-10-30 09:37:25+00:00): This edit was a revision to church details.
AsgerFrank (2015-11-11 11:53:38+00:00): Har ikke meldt noget til fvst, men rettet/oprettet dem i osm. 
Forkerte koordinater hos fvst på Kafé 93, Nordborg (navnelbnr70324206) (200m fejl).
Juventus Pizza, Frederiksborg (navnelbnr530916) forkert i Borgen Sø., hvor Castillo & Co i virkeligheden er (200km fejl).
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-11-11 12:08:20+00:00): Fint,
jeg tagger rettede maddsteder med
fvst:fixme=wrong location in FVST

Jeg har skrevet til FVST og gjort dem opmaeksom paa det. De kan se alle rettelser paa:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/cd9

Jeg vil senere lave et vaektoj, der viser hvor OSM koordinater adskiller sig fra FVST's for at finde fejl i OSM eller maaske at opdage restauranter, der flytter (jeg er ikke klar over de saa kan beholde deres navnelobenr) og saa er det vigtigt at vide om vi har rettet fejl i FVST.
AsgerFrank (2015-11-11 13:05:15+00:00): Åh ja, så havde jeg alligevel set det før, i http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Restauranter_og_Smiley_kontrolresultater
- men minde-forvekslede det med som vi efter lignende princip bruger ois:fixme til adressepunkter.
Papa Schlumpf (2015-10-31 12:58:09+00:00): Da besteht keine Verbindung
ratrun (2015-10-31 16:36:27+00:00): Falls wirklich keine Verbindung besteht, dann setzt bitte ein noexit=yes auf den östlichen Endknoten. Laut Bing Lufbild sollte aber zumindest eine Verbindung mit dem Fussweg bestehen. 
Wenn der östliche Ausgang für Taxis gesperrt ist, dann sollte wohl das westliche Ende verbunden werden, sonst hängt diese Strasse ja in der Luft.
Papa Schlumpf (2015-10-31 16:52:17+00:00): Es ist absolut schlechter Stil, Bing als Vorlage zu benutzen! Was vor Ort ist, ist wichtig. Also: selber hingehen und anschauen und nicht einfach planlos ändern und behaupten.
malenki (2015-11-02 20:02:37+00:00): In diesem Changeset hast du das place-node des Ortes gelöscht und place=village an das landuse=residential geschrieben. An sich ist das laut Wiki nicht  verkehrt – aber hier man könnte denken, dass die Eckhofstraße nicht zum Ort gehört, weil der Name am Gebiet die Ausdehnung festzulegen scheint.  
Probleme mit place= an Flächen bekommt man spätestens, wenn ein Ort aus mehr besteht als einem Wohngebiet (Gewerbegebiet, Friedhof etc). ;)
Karsten Natebus (2015-11-02 20:23:30+00:00): Hallo, Du hast Recht. Das könnte so interpretieriert werden. Ich würde hier eher jetzt noch den Ort erweitern. Der bisherige Grundriss wurde ja von Bing adaptiert. Mittlerweile gibt es in der Eckhofstraße etliche Neubauten und sollten somit zum Ort gehören.
malenki (2015-11-02 20:58:29+00:00): Aktueller als Bing zu sein ist immer gut – aber man muss achtgeben, dass nicht jemand Gutmeinendes das wieder "repariert". ^^
Baloo Uriza (2015-10-29 17:09:37+00:00): Correct comment for changeset would be "Update on I 35/OK 9 at Norman"
cadsauxk (2015-11-01 01:39:12+00:00): Essa Praça 3452, não seria a continuação da Avenida Sebastião de Brito? Veja aqui porque estou perguntando: http://www.bhtrans.pbh.gov.br/portal/page/portal/portalpublicodl/funcionalidade/noticiasedestaques/maisnoticiasv2?p_pagina_atual=4&p_pagina_inicial=1&p_pagina_final=10
Vítor Dias (2015-11-03 10:23:33+00:00): Gerald, segundo o BHMap - http://bhmap.pbh.gov.br/BHMap/ - o nome é Praça 3452. Abraços!
cadsauxk (2015-11-03 11:55:22+00:00): Esse trecho inteiro da rua chamar "Praça 3452" é muito estranho. Segundo a BHTrans  na descrição "Rua Álvaro Martins, entre Rua Orozimbo Nonato e Av. Sebastião de Brito" dá a entender que a Rua Álvaro Martins cruza com a Av. Sebastião de Brito, o que não ocorre com o nosso mapa.

Qual a condição de uso do BHMap?
Vítor Dias (2015-11-03 12:03:50+00:00): Gerald, achei e mandei um e-mail com cópia para você, pois no site do BHMap não se especifica nada sobre uso dos dados.
muralito (2015-11-04 14:47:56+00:00): liceo es amenity=school
college es para educacion post secundaria
muralito (2015-11-04 14:49:58+00:00): los niveles que se dictan en cada lugar se pueden describir con las etiquetas 
isced:level
Departamento de Geografía - MIDES (2015-11-04 15:05:57+00:00): Buena información. Gracias!!
Departamento de Geografía - MIDES (2015-11-04 15:07:12+00:00): No se tiene los niveles que se dictan, pero es bueno conocer la forma de registrar esa información.
MKnight (2017-01-07 14:57:01+00:00): wheelchair yes oder no auf dem Theatercafe? 
Auch sollte der poi nur einmal da sein.
MKnight (2017-02-09 14:44:42+00:00): scheint behoben.
MarcoR (2021-05-27 13:17:00+00:00): Ciao! Questo parco sembrerebbe un test e non un oggetto realmente esistente. Che ne pensi se lo elimino?
Davide Cuturi (2021-05-27 13:28:18+00:00): ciao Marco,
in realtà non è un test, quello indicato è una villa di una persona il cui nick è Ricixxx; però sono d'accordo che può essere cancellato
Davide Cuturi (2021-05-27 13:29:39+00:00): anzi, per fare prima l'ho cancellato io
MarcoR (2021-05-27 13:32:07+00:00): Grazie sei stato velocissimo :) Buon mapping!
Davide Cuturi (2021-05-27 13:34:20+00:00): grazie Marco, 
buon mapping anche a te!
yuryleb (2016-01-12 15:55:08+00:00): Почему удалили название? В РГИС сейчас лакуна на этом месте, но 2-3 года назад эта дорога определенно была обозначена как Конюшенный переулок
Pavel239 (2016-01-12 16:08:34+00:00): Теперь это не Конюшенный переулок. Раньше, возможно, была ошибка.
yuryleb (2016-01-12 18:11:59+00:00): Не похоже было на ошибку, вполне типичный случай - Конюшенный переулок подходил с двух сторон к Конюшенной площади, как, например, Итальянская улица к площади Искусств
species (2015-10-31 14:05:15+00:00): is there a cycleway in opposite direction?
laimer83 (2015-10-31 16:10:03+00:00): Yes, there is a cycle way in opposite direction, same as Maygasse 29 up to north. I wil try to add this attribute, please check whether it is fine for you
laimer83 (2015-10-31 16:14:10+00:00): I have no added the admission for bicylces
species (2015-10-31 16:41:02+00:00): Thanks, perfect! :-)
GerdP (2015-10-30 08:17:21+00:00): please review way 377508298:
the tag highway=unclassified;residential
is invalid. 
This problem is likely to happen with iD,so take care or maybe use another editor, e.g. JOSM.
GOwin (2015-10-29 19:46:58+00:00): The following tags may be more approriate (and specific)
landuse=orchard
crop=strawberry
hadw (2015-10-31 11:06:17+00:00): Is the official name for this area of land really "Strawberry and Vegetable Farms"?  It sounds like a description and names should never be used as a description.  You should use proper meta-data for that.  Remember that the map is the data; it is not the standard rendering, and you should never map to obtain a particular rendering.

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

I think the name in version 13 is more plausible, but still the rule is to follow what is signposted on the ground.  If this is an anonymous collection of farms owned by the University, it should have no name, but could have an operator tag.

Even if there is a sign saying "to the strawberry and vegetable farms", you should decide whether that is just a description, rather than a name.
Hawkeye (2016-02-13 19:52:30+00:00): Hi Neil, I think we should keep this a cycleway. if it's a broad path, suitable for cycling then cycleway should apply. I think highway=footway + bicycle=yes is more suitable where the path is narrow and no signage. technically you can cycle on any path. But best to distinguish between small, narrow paths and wider thoroughfares. let me know what you think. I've revert some changes to the paths in Livingston. but we can discuss further.
kongktd (2015-10-29 19:12:09+00:00): Could not identify the round objects next to the building. I assume it is fence.
DaveLakowski (2015-10-29 20:58:28+00:00): Hi there, great that you are surveying here. I think it is a good idea to keep the legal footpath route as people are entitled to use it and perhaps add the new way as an alternative.

Cheers
DaveLakowski
Neil Bauers (2015-11-01 15:15:18+00:00): OK - I'll put it back.
Baloo Uriza (2017-08-16 04:05:22+00:00): refs are not names.
GerdP (2015-10-30 08:19:58+00:00): please review way 377534368:
the tags 
highway=unclassified;secondary
surface=asphalt;paved
are invalid, the tag 
history=Retrieved from v3
should probably be source=Retrieved from v3 ?
GerdP (2015-10-31 07:51:39+00:00): I've tried to fix it, see 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34986806
And sorry about the history tag, I though it was historic. Just learned that I can ignore the history tag.
GerdP (2015-10-30 07:44:21+00:00): please review way 377477931:
the tag highway=construction;residential
is invalid, I guess you meant
highway=construction
construction=residential 
I've changed it to that.
Nakaner (2018-02-21 15:46:45+00:00): Hallo,

in diesem Änderungssatz hast du die ursprünglich als alt_name=* getaggten "komischen" Namen wie "Nordwestknoten Breitenweg Abfahrt" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23188610) in name=* verschoben, das zuvor nicht getaggt war. Sind die Namen überhaupt vor Ort ausgeschildert oder nur mehr oder minder verwaltungsinterne Bezeichnungen, die sonst keiner kennt?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Glassman (2015-10-31 16:35:04+00:00): We don't usually put people names on houses unless they are historical names. You might want to remove it if it contains personal information. Addresses are okay.
Alan (2015-10-29 21:40:59+00:00): 👍
malenki (2015-11-02 19:00:35+00:00): Hallo ranger07,

du hast in diesem Changeset den "Fuchsbrand" zum "Ungerhof" umbenannt¹. Maps4BW kennt den Hof aber als "Fuchsbrand".²  
Da du keinen Kommentar zu der Änderung geschrieben hast, frage ich auf diesem Weg nach.

Viele Grüße  
malenki

¹ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2540945654/history  
² http://malenki.ch/d/2015-11-02_195526_scr.png
GerdP (2015-10-30 17:01:24+00:00): please review node 3809224524:
highway=ele
opening_hours=Mo-Fri
What is meant here?
SomeoneElse (2015-10-30 20:23:47+00:00): Based on is location, I wonder if it's a hospital entrance door that's only open during the week?
GerdP (2015-10-30 21:05:53+00:00): yes, maybe with an elevator close to it
pmailkeey (2015-10-30 22:45:43+00:00): Yes indeed. Closed evenings and weekend presumably for security. It's not a publicly advertised entrance.
GerdP (2015-10-31 05:37:46+00:00): okay, the elevator is a
highway=elevator, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Delevator
The time maybe:
opening_hours=Mo-Fr 08:30-20:00
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
will_p (2015-10-30 10:03:18+00:00): You have added the postcode NG2 3AA to Nottingham Mail Centre. This appears wrong to me, because the mail centre is in the NG9 postcode area. I don't doubt mail for the postcode you added is processed here, but it is certainly not the postcode of the mail centre itself.
Guy (2015-10-30 20:19:39+00:00): This is a Boots PO Box number for the mail centre: whether it should be the Boots site at "Thane Road West" I don't know. According to doogal.co.uk the postcode (PC) is at the mail centre. Mail centres often have multiple PCs, I would expect this one is NG9 nxx (if it is in NG9) where n is the PC sector number and xx are two PC unit letters that are the same (typically used for mail centres). Happy to have this removed but the ground truth is that mail will go to this office even for Boots sited nearby
SK53 (2015-10-31 15:45:48+00:00): Please dont add postcodes which dont have real geographical content to such buildings. There are probably hundreds of postcodes co-located at this building, none of which correspond to the postcode for the building. By adding such postcodes you will make it very difficult for people who use postcodes for routing, or for identifying post code districts, areas and sectors. I wrote extensive notes about this issue here http://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/british-postcodes-on-openstreetmap.html. (For reference Boots main postcodes are in postcode area NG80, but please don't add these either).
SK53 (2015-10-31 16:07:23+00:00): Thinking about it, I suspect that NG2 1AA is a postcode associated originally with the Pennyfoot St location (or possibly even Station Street), which has been parked at the delivery office instead of being reused.
chillly (2015-10-31 16:27:12+00:00): doogal.co.uk is not a valid source for OSM. He releases his CODE as PD (not really possible in the UK but still ...) but copyright remains on all other content.
Richard (2015-10-31 16:34:37+00:00): doogal.co.uk is a direct interface to Google's geocoder data. See (for example) http://www.doogal.co.uk/ShowMap.php?postcode=OX7%203PH, open up the web inspector in your browser, and look at all the requests to maps.googleapis.com. This data can't be used in OSM.
zool (2015-11-01 07:25:38+00:00): dear Guy, I write on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group. This discussion has been sent our way due to concern over data derived from the Google API (via doogal.co.uk) potentially being added to OpenStreetMap. As Richard points out above, this data can't be used within OSM. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F for more detail on this topic.

There are other, open-licensed sources of UK postcode data that you can use, for example http://uk-postcodes.com/ which provides data with the Open Government License (formerly the Ordnance Survey Open Data License).

Please don't use the Google Geocoder or related services when editing OpenStreetMap.
SK53 (2015-10-31 16:02:37+00:00): I very much doubt that the security guard checkpoint at the entrance to the Boots site has its own housenumber. Furthermore the Nottingham City Council GIS (which contains all Nottingham addresses) doesn't have any entry for "1 Thane Road". I'd be interested to know what your source was for this information.
smaprs (2015-10-30 13:15:24+00:00): Já estava mapeada corretamente a área com os nomes "Parque Farroupilha" e "Parque da Redenção"
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 12:15:24+00:00): What does "tag cleanup" mean?  It looks like you've removed some tags here (such as to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344084405/history ).  Even if the previous tag didn't match what was on the ground, it's only polite to explain to the previous mapper (perhaps by a changeset comment) what the problem was, and what they should have mapped it as.
smaprs (2015-11-06 23:28:14+00:00): Já existe Parque Marinha do Brasil
smaprs (2015-11-06 23:51:42+00:00): Deslocou a parada de ônibus e a plataforma
smaprs (2015-10-30 12:47:52+00:00): Olá Francieli. A etiqueta "opening_hours" deve seguir o formato conforme descrito em "http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en-US". Caso contrário não é reconhecida pelo sistema. Quando você tiver alguma dúvida, busque no wiki a etiqueta (tag) ou chave (key) , e obterá as informações prórprias. Att.
user_8466505 (2020-10-29 05:07:30+00:00): Only one more day before the anniversary of these buildings on OpenStreetMap!
smaprs (2015-10-30 01:39:08+00:00): Francieli, por favor, tenha cuidado ao editar coisas que já estavam corretas:
- a catedral é católica, não "jewish": http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377552995/history
- a Igreja das Dores está totalmente bagunçada: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377552150/history - este corpo de bombeiros estava com endereço certo; agora você colocou errado: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348682998/history - o shopping já estava correto, esta área que você adicionou não tem sentido : http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376475155/history
- esta igreja não pode ser em Porto Alegre, pois está em Recife, Pernambuco: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377553087/history

É possível que tenham muitos outros erros em suas edições.
Não há condição de revisar todos.
Por favor revise suas edições e daqui para a frente tenha mais cuidado.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:37:34+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
smaprs (2015-10-30 01:39:48+00:00): Francieli, por favor, tenha cuidado ao editar coisas que já estavam corretas: 
- a catedral é católica, não "jewish": http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377552995/history
- a Igreja das Dores está totalmente bagunçada: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377552150/history - este corpo de bombeiros estava com endereço certo; agora você colocou errado: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348682998/history - o shopping já estava correto, esta área que você adicionou não tem sentido : http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376475155/history
- esta igreja não pode ser em Porto Alegre, pois está em Recife, Pernambuco: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377553087/history
É possível que tenham muitos outros erros em suas edições. 
Não há condição de revisar todos. 
Por favor revise suas edições e daqui para a frente tenha mais cuidado.
smaprs (2015-10-30 03:01:56+00:00): Olá Priscila, não existe esta tag para cuisine. verifique as disponíveis em http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine?uselang=en-US. Verifique o nome correto da rua, tal como está no mapa.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:37:30+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
smaprs (2015-10-30 03:26:45+00:00): Olá jsouza, bem vindas suas contribuições. Porém necessita que revises: como padrão no OSM os nomes devem ser colocados diferenciando Maiúsculas/minúsculas, e com acentuação. A Paróquia Pão dos Pobres já possuía dados; não se deve duplicar.
smaprs (2015-11-06 00:29:47+00:00): Já existe o "Boteco do Joaquim" (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3798868945/history). Qual está certo?
SomeoneElse (2015-11-19 18:07:37+00:00): Hi - just spotted "Orage EE" at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3809342910 - I'm guessing that that should be "Everything Everywhere" or "EE" now?  I doubt there's any "Orange" branding left and if there is it'd be "Orange" not "Orage" :)
trigpoint (2015-12-14 18:16:10+00:00): I have removed the tags from the duplicate cinema created in this changeset, the tags had been added to a car park node and dragged inside the building distorting the parking aisles.
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35951470
I also find it unlikely that there is a sign on the cinema that says Swansea Odeon
Константин Гам (2016-08-16 10:26:14+00:00): Пожалуйста давайте нормальные комментарии к правкам карты.
Также обратите внимание, что у созданного вами салона красоты есть название - и его и нужно указывать, а не перечень услуг.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:37:24+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
trigpoint (2015-12-14 18:21:08+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3809356669 really a single shop?
I suspect they should be mapped as two separate nodes, a boots that sells bikes would be a real one off. Boots should be tagged as shop=pharmacy, not chemist
GerdP (2015-10-31 07:05:11+00:00): please review way 313285301:
the tag highway=footway;path is invalid,
please correct it. This problem is likely to 
happen with iD, so take care ;-)
Polarbear (2016-07-01 23:38:00+00:00): Please do not map turn lanes as separate highways. That is only used when they are physically separated. In the case of Richard-Wagner-Platz, you even created implausible turn:lanes constructions that confused routers, probably by copy/pasting values. 

The place has been fixed now, and the fictive right-turn shortcuts have been removed as well.

Please use meaningful changeset comments.
Swen Wacker (2015-11-01 19:37:58+00:00): Hallo m-f-p,

schön, dass Du Dich bei OpenStreetMap engagierst und die Datenbank verbesserst.

Damit Karten- und Navigationsprogramme die Datenbank "lesen" können, ginbt es ein paar wenige Regeln, die wir beachten. Dazu gehört unter anderem, dass wir einen Namen nur angeben, wenn das wirklich der Namen und nicht etwa die Beschreibung ist  ("Mülltonne" oder "Weide" sind keine Namen in diesem Sinne).

Beste Grüße

Swen
Supaplex (2015-10-30 11:29:50+00:00): 那現在是空地還是工地？
yuan3156 (2015-11-02 06:13:40+00:00): 那塊是重劃區, 市政府正在整地. 目前是一塊大工地
CloCkWeRX (2019-06-07 05:51:10+00:00): With the woolworths, do you happen to know which one is the right one? See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1804159
olede4 (2015-10-30 21:57:12+00:00): Нет, взлётная полоса совсем не такая.
olede4 (2015-10-30 21:57:58+00:00): Или перепутан тег "тропинки"? :)
TrulsBekk (2015-10-31 23:37:17+00:00): Please ovoid making intercontinental changesets.
holgerd (2015-11-01 08:51:34+00:00): thanks for your feedback, here is the status on this: https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap/issues/29
GOwin (2015-10-30 07:58:03+00:00): what is the license of use by which you acquired your DPWH shapefiles?
afffff (2015-10-30 08:05:55+00:00): I requested it through my office last year. Is it not allowed to use it here? If not, please delete my changes.
GOwin (2015-10-30 08:34:34+00:00): The "request" may not be enough for that purpose. We never got public domain data out of DPWH, especially shapefiles so this is possible not compatible with OSM license.
GOwin (2015-10-30 08:38:29+00:00): Revert completed. See 34966793
ianlopez1115 (2015-10-30 12:35:44+00:00): I think that there might be a typo in node 3809597504 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3809597504). Also, kudos for the use of the level tag (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level)
seav (2015-10-31 06:10:02+00:00): Note: Eurotel still exists. Dream Hotel is a separate entity (a motel) located behind Eurotel.
GerdP (2015-11-01 08:37:25+00:00): please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357469948
You have merged the attributes of two different ways, I guess you just wanted to connect it to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9010307 ?
GerdP (2015-11-09 14:24:37+00:00): Are you sure that the merged road is 
named River Side Drive ?
Kirbert (2015-11-10 00:32:33+00:00): No!  I was just cleaning up a mess on the map, disjointed roads shown that clearly did not correspond to the roads shown on the satellite photo.  But it's a weird road, to be sure, looking as though it doesn't actually connect to GA 37.  I guess I should have added a note for someone on the ground to confirm the roads and road names.
GerdP (2015-11-10 17:47:25+00:00): reg. the name: I am not a local, so I can't say. The original tags said Norris Street
for the longer part of the current way.
The tiger tags still show both variants, so yes, please add a note and I'd try to contact Richard , the initial mapper:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Richard