piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Graf Westerholt (2017-05-10 06:00:48+00:00): Du hast bei diesem Parkplatz http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29131430 einen Namen eingetragen. Steht der Name auf einem Schild am Parkplatz oder sonst irgendwo offiziell, dass das der Name des Parkplatzes ist? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491957210 muss man immer bezahlen? Normalerweise muss man nur tagsüber bezahlen. Du könntest noch parking=* ergänzen, opening_hours=* (meistens 24/7), access=*, check_date=*, maxstay=* und in description=* die Gebühr schreiben.

Ebenso hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315182666 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29131430 und wenn die kostenlos sind, dann fee=no.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parking
Isolator (2017-05-17 07:38:20+00:00): Hallo, die Frage nach dem Namen ist berechtigt. Da ich es nicht weiß, habe ich ihn entfernt, aber eine passende Bemerkung hinterlassen.
Ambush (2017-05-07 20:29:00+00:00): А улицу добавить к дому? ))
Shinobi V (2017-05-07 20:31:41+00:00): Щя добавим😊
Commodoortje (2017-05-08 03:06:12+00:00): Hoi Oebe,
Ik heb een paar kleine verbeteringen aangebracht.
Hier kun je zien welke:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48489182
.
Standaard toegangsbeperkingen kun je in deze tabel aflezen.
foot=yes op een footway is daarom overbodig.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Ambush (2017-05-07 21:58:44+00:00): Нужно было удалить магазин (я его уже удалил). А ты удалил кафе :(
Commodoortje (2017-05-08 02:54:26+00:00): Ik heb de 2 nodes samengevoegd naar 1 POI.
Ook heb ik de website toegevoegd.
Commodoortje (2017-05-08 02:57:35+00:00): Openingstijden aangepast. Een handige tool hiervoor is:
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48489119
R0m0l (2017-05-08 10:10:59+00:00): Ik zal proberen meer van deze bijdragen te leveren omdat veel motorrijders daar gebruik van maken.
AgusQui (2017-05-29 03:10:58+00:00): Hola Dani Gutierrez, acá: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2830515106#map=19/-34.63917/-58.36074 agregaste como que es la última parada del 64 ¿en la parada del bus turistico? ¿no parará del lado de enfrente?
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-13 07:39:18+00:00): Jeśli dodajesz obiekty takie jak https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.51642&mlon=21.99165#map=19/52.51642/21.99165 to warto dolinkować je do istniejącej sieci chodników/dróg (dodałem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491979486 by to rozwiązać)

Bez tego wyszukiwanie trasy nie potrafi ich wykorzystać.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-13 07:42:43+00:00): I drugie - jeśli jest kościół bez swojej strony w Wikipedii/Wikidanych to nie dodawaj tagu Wikipedia linkującego do parafii.

Jeśli chcesz to można je dac na kościele w postaci operator:wikipedia i operator:wikidata lub dać na obiekcie parafii (pewnie będzie to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:boundary%3Dreligious_administration ).
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-13 07:43:45+00:00): Z samego kościoła można linkowac z użyciem tagów wikipedia/wikidata jeśli jest artykuł o samym kościele, np https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ko%C5%9Bci%C3%B3%C5%82_Marii_Panny_w_Legnicy
Commodoortje (2017-05-08 02:46:26+00:00): Deze wijziging begrijp ik niet helemaal.
cafetaria is een fast_food volgens mij, geen cafe zoals je ervan gemaakt hebt.
Kun je dit uitleggen?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:amenity
Fast-Food restaurant
Plaats waar klaargemaakt (warm) eten kan worden gekocht. Onder deze categorie vallen Snackbars, Cafetaria's en afhaalrestaurant zoals pizzeria, chinees enzovoort.
R0m0l (2017-05-08 10:13:47+00:00): Klopt het is geen cafe maar een cafetaria.

Sorry voor de verwarring er stond dacht ik eerst fastfood en dat wilde ik aanpassen in cafetaria.

Dat was dus niet goed.
Commodoortje (2017-05-08 10:37:27+00:00): Ga je het herstellen?
R0m0l (2017-05-08 10:54:26+00:00): Ja ga ik doen.
eggie (2017-05-07 21:57:00+00:00): removed  name:nl  Leidseplein 火车站5/2/1
neuhausr (2017-05-08 20:24:41+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! Is there a particular reason you added the landuse=recreation_ground tag to the whole park? It seems redundant at best.
kayle (2017-05-09 06:36:23+00:00): Ahoj, prosím ťa čo sú tieto body?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4840537177
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4840537176
Sú to turistické značky čo sú na stromoch a podobne?
https://www.google.sk/search?q=turisticke+znacenie&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwit6LnbmOLTAhXFfxoKHY-6CzcQ_AUICigB&biw=1214&bih=955
.
Lebo man_made=survey_point je skôr pre geodetické body http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point
Ďakujem
olehz (2017-06-19 08:23:52+00:00): навіщо вносити неактуальні історичні дані?
Constable (2019-07-09 10:40:57+00:00): ciao, in riferimento a questo ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366837225/history ) tratto di sentiero da te modificato; era prima etichettato come sentiero sterrato, adatto a cavalli, mtb e pedoni. É giusto averlo conferito in ciclabile asfaltata con nome "Sentiero Valtellina"?
Il nome è a prescindere superfluo perché nel caso andrebbe dato alla relazione del Sentiero Valtellina, non a tutti i tratti che lo compongono. Il mio dubbio però riguarda la vera esistenza di questa "variante" tra l'Adda e l'altro tratto parallelo di sentiero Valtellina.
Confermi che questo tratto esista, sia asfaltato e faccia davvero parte del sentiero Valtellina?
grazie
Eros93 (2019-07-09 19:15:24+00:00): Ciao, nel tratto da te indicato (ad est della SP4 dirA) c'é solo un percorso del Sentiero Valtellina. E' così da molti anni, corre sopra l'argine ed è asfaltato. Non mi risulta essere affiancato da altre stradine/sentieri, certamente non c'è nient'altro con asfalto.
Non ricordo più com'era la situazione quando ho fatto la modifica, ricordo solo che avevo aggiunto dei tratti mancanti della pista ciclopedonale.
Constable (2019-07-10 15:57:09+00:00): ok grazie, provvedo a rimuovere il tratto doppio quindi, visto che non risulta visibile ne sulla heatmap di strava, ne sulle immagini aeree.
grazie!
Constable (2019-07-10 16:00:39+00:00): Rettifico; credo sia più corretto riportarlo alla versione precedente la tua modifica ( https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=48486558 ), era etichettato come sentiero per cavalli.
Grazie, ciao!
mueschel (2017-05-08 18:59:16+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - e.g. you added several buildings with the tag "builing" instead of "building".

Cheers, Jan
BCNorwich (2017-05-08 06:28:01+00:00): Confusing with two different names. Can you confirm the change to Co Op Local?  I've put a note on OSM asking for local confirmation of change.
trigpoint (2017-05-10 17:01:53+00:00): Hi, please could you explain why you have removed the name from this school?
Thanks Phil
adventure1 (2017-05-10 18:48:32+00:00): Duplicated data cluttering map. There is a school pinpoint within the school grounds. This entry is the school grounds one.
Many thanks for querying :)
trigpoint (2017-05-10 19:15:45+00:00): Hi, the correct place to tag a school is on the grounds. Nodes are seen as a poor way to tag large areas. There was a successful project 
There was no additional node however, there was a bus stop, which you have added school tags to. I believe that both these changes should be reverted. 
Cheers Phil
smaprs (2017-05-08 00:19:02+00:00): Legal!
ika-chan! (2017-05-14 04:35:05+00:00): I don't know what is the idea behind this changeset since you haven't left a changeset comment. Where you upgraded a secondary road, I think that the new road may be yet another "high-quality" provincial road like Karditsa to Larissa.
JayCBR (2017-05-14 19:43:04+00:00): i dont think this road is an upgrade to ΕΠ1, it should be separate as an unofficial national highway (it is designed to link A2 to Edessa).
ΕΠ1 can be secondary, following its original route
JayCBR (2017-05-14 19:44:27+00:00): i also think Karditsa - Larissa should be trunk because it would serve as a link between Larisa and A3
ika-chan! (2017-05-15 11:05:08+00:00): I disagree with Karditsa - Larissa being trunk because the Thessaly government refers to this as a (albeit high quality) provincial road and I did my research on that (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Greece/National_Road_Network#Not_National_Roads). There is no evidence that it has changed, the same is the case for the ΕΠ1. If you are saying that all provincial roads should be secondary, then I should personally stick to that rule. Again, let me think about these before you jump ahead.
OffTheChart (2017-05-08 07:55:25+00:00): The roads inside the gates are known by the Gate Numbers, so it wasn't incorrect as it was. If this doesn't render on the map I will revert your changes. Will you ***PLEASE*** consider adding new detail rather than meddling with existing features?
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-08 09:14:18+00:00): Hi if the roads inside are known by the gate numbers then I stand corrected. It would be useful if you added a note to say that this is the case as this is extremely unusual. However, roads should only be named with the name tag if that name is one which would be used outside the local area (i.e. would be expected to appear in an index of road names). If the name is only locally used it should go in the loc_name field.

It is also incorrect to add data just so that it appears on the standard OSM rendered map, so you should not make a change based on that. We are contributing to a database, not a map. The OSM renderer is just one of a whole variety of renederers of the data. If you feel a feature should be rendered by the standard renderer, then you need to take it up with the rendering team, rather than attempt to work around it.

Attempting to correct errors is not "meddling". A database that is continually having c**p added is not as useful as one which has less data, but is more accurate. I note that the number of traces I have added is getting on for 10 times yours and each of these has had significant detail added.

I see no reason for you to be offensive in your comments.

Regards,
Mike
OffTheChart (2017-05-08 12:55:54+00:00): I've put a lot of effort into the Jersey part of OSM, as I live here and actually know the island and its quirks. My aim has been to produce a map that is useful in its standard presentation. It's frustrating that there have been several instances of things changing and affecting this state of affairs, and it always seems to be **YOU** doing it. I'm not interested in a 'database', just the standard map. If my work is not appreciated, then I will no longer contribute. I merely wonder why your considerable talents can't be more usefully employed in many other areas of the world, rather than making our corner of the world's map worse?
AgusQui (2017-05-09 05:16:03+00:00): Hola LauCalfa, bienvenida a OpenStreetMap, lamentablemente tuve que revertir todas tus ediciones ya que, entre muchos otros problemas, generaron que desaparezca el Río de La Plata. Por favor ten más cuidado con tus ediciones, si no sabes que es algo investiga en la wiki de OSM o consulta con el resto de la comunidad. Creo que el principal problema es que no viste que casi todo en este sector está mapeado con relaciones, que son algo complejas para principiantes. 
Por favor indica cual serían los límites de la reserva así te ayudo a arreglarlas. Respecto a tu comentario "todavía sigo dudando", tienes que saber con certeza antes de corregir algo, sino déjalo como está.
Cualquier duda consúltanos y te ayudamos: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina
Josef73 (2020-03-16 20:09:56+00:00): Hello, can you check the opening_hours? Thanks.
RachBLevine (2020-03-16 20:53:22+00:00): Hey @josef73 you might want to call the shop / a hotline. Hours for a lot of places have changed due to local pandemic responses.
HubMiner (2017-09-26 02:31:13+00:00): Hi, you created a few nodes west of this one, with no tags.  Are these OK to delete, or you are planning to do something with these?
schadow1 (2017-05-08 01:32:01+00:00): Good work for correctly tagging buildings to its type and not its name. However what is still in correct is tagging a building with a landuse. The landuse tag is used to tag a larger area that is used as commercial, etc.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse
I'll be fixing these latest changesets by removing the buildings with landuse tags.
schadow1 (2017-05-08 01:41:10+00:00): fixed
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48488452
BCNorwich (2017-05-08 06:37:40+00:00): There is a hotel at that address (to the south) but not in the middle of the river, unless you've booked a water bed and it's slipped its moorings. Anyway this node remove as obviously a mistake.
Jothirnadh (2017-05-08 09:20:56+00:00): Hi zsolt d,
I came across this changeset while reviewing all global changesets in OSM changeset analyser (https://osmcha.mapbox.com/48489012/). I can see that you added `man_mage=cutline` tag for highway's. Did you do it with local knowledge? If so can you check the existence of these highways as they seem to be imagery drawings for me.

Cheers,
Jothirnadh
zsolt d (2017-05-08 23:15:34+00:00): Hi Jothirnadh,
It was a mistake. I corrected, thanks.
Best regards,
zsolt d
Christophe33 (2017-05-08 03:06:54+00:00): mauvais nommage du groupe de modifications
compdude (2017-09-20 02:04:23+00:00): Is there a reason you made part of Cave Creek Road a cycleway, or was that a mistake?
Dr Kludge (2017-09-25 14:18:15+00:00): compdude, it was an obvious mistake.  Is there any reason that you could not fix it if you already noticed the problem?
BCNorwich (2017-05-08 06:41:52+00:00): Postcode presentation corrected
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-26 07:31:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48992034, 48991550, 48992768, 48992498, 48992250, 48991347, 48991791 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and un-discussed data uploads (shop=TD)
nammala (2017-05-08 07:15:28+00:00): Hi あお＠ポケGO,

Noticed that you have added park over the buildings. Could you please confirm the edit. Please add data which is on the ground.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:31:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:18:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-05-08 11:23:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок есть некоторые недочёты:  
1. Улицу лучше всего назвать как принято в OSM «Николаевская улица», а не «улица Николаевская»;  
2. Эта улица (дорога с названием) не должна выходить за границу населённого пункта;  
3. В пределах населённого пункта дорога класса track большая редкость (обычно они в лесах, которые находятся в пределах населённого пункта, но здесь такого нет). Обычно если такие дороги не являются улицами (residential), то они являются проездами (service).
nammala (2017-05-08 07:31:07+00:00): Hi PuperzenWalter,

OpenStreetMap is the real map of the world. Please make sure you add valuable data not fictional data. Noticed you adding wetland over buildings.

regards,
nammala
eggie (2017-05-08 07:26:50+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48492002
Gebouwen worden tegenwoordig direct vanuit de BAG geïmporteerd.
Dien even een aanvraag in op het forum onder het draadje Verzoek BAG import met deze hyperlink erbij. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48492002#map=18/53.00008/5.94568
eggie (2017-05-08 07:32:34+00:00): De adresgegevens horen op de adresnode ivm zoekslagen routeplanners  en niet op het gebouw, maar na import zal zit vanzelf gecorrigeerd zijn. 
Inlog forum is zelfde als je osm account.
ligfietser (2017-05-08 10:18:01+00:00): Lourens, ik heb het gebouw en twee  adressen geïmporteerd. Graag zelf de tags op de juiste adressen zetten, nu staat er alleen nog maar een naam op het gebouw.
Hb- (2017-11-19 17:44:16+00:00): This isn't a natural resource but 100% artificial. I'm going revert this change.
eggie (2017-05-08 07:31:00+00:00): highway=service was correct getagd. De naam erop klopt natuurlijk wel.
LourensHengst (2017-05-08 08:12:37+00:00): de naam klopt, bron pdok.nl
user_3216889 (2017-05-08 14:06:33+00:00): Sportcentrum niet aangeven met een punt, maar als een omtreklijn om het geheel aan velden, gebouwen, parkeerterrein (niet vastmaken aan bestaande punten/lijnen!).
Oefenveld links en parkeerterrein lopen deels door gebouw heen; goed inzoomen om dit aan te passen.
Parkeerterrein heeft vast geen eigen adres en huisnummer.
LourensHengst (2017-05-09 05:52:12+00:00): Henk,
Ik heb het parkeerterrein ontdaan van de naam (terecht). één punt zit nog vast aan het sporterrein, is dan de actie verwijderen en opnieuw plaatsen?
Het sportterrein loopt door het gebouw heen, kan ik knooppunten toevoegen?
user_3216889 (2017-05-09 07:21:17+00:00): Punt losmaken door selecteren en dan op D drukken.
Punt toevoegen door op een lijn dubbel te klikken.
Dalkvist (2017-05-08 08:18:18+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 
Gångområdet finns redan runt hela arenan, den gråa ytan med svart kant på kartan. Det är en relation som består av flera andra segment, https://osm.org/relation/3268935
Är det bara södra delen som du taggat som är upphöjt eller är det hela området runt arenan?
Andreas Hermansson (altsaxen) (2017-05-08 18:49:49+00:00): Hej! Tack för svaret! Anledningen till att jag la till gångområdet var att OSMs vägbeskrivning inte ville korsa området, den la istället rutten runt hela Friends Arena via Råsta Strandväg och Evenemangsgatan. Det gick inte heller att lägga ett avslut eller start på vägbeskrivningen mitt på Putte Kocks plats. Tänkte att problemet kanske kunde vara att området inte var inlagt som gångväg. Anledningen att jag bara la in södra området är att det östra/nordöstra området till del är parkering, antog att det skulle läggas in på annat sätt. Har du förslag på hur det kan göras annorlunda? Är helt ny på att redigera, hoppas att jag inte sabbat något.
Dalkvist (2017-05-09 08:37:35+00:00): Tror att de flesta vägbeskrivningsprogrammen har problem att hantera ytor generellt.
Jag är osäker på hur man löser det bäst, fråga gärna på https://help.osm.org/ tror att det är störst chans att det är någon som vet där.
Andreas Hermansson (altsaxen) (2017-05-09 09:52:55+00:00): Ah ok, så kan det ju absolut vara. Tack för hjälpen! Jag återställer området så länge (tar bort det jag la till).
mavl (2019-01-19 16:46:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
eggie (2017-05-08 08:08:23+00:00): Please check your contribution. You are sure the (money) bank is situated in the middle of the road?
eggie (2017-05-08 08:15:39+00:00): reverted.. no moneybank here.. not even a bench.
pabsan (2017-05-09 18:09:00+00:00): El proyecto de la VARIANTE DE TORRELLANO está aprovado por ADIF a través del ministerio de fomento en 2010, (https://vimeopro.com/user13110272/lav-levante/video/49587799)  donde la linea de cercanias realiza el trazado expuesto en el mapa.
dsaneus (2017-05-09 22:24:44+00:00): Hola,
efectivamente ese es uno de los muchos proyectos para nuevas líneas de ferrocarril entre Alicante y Murcia.
Actualmente no se sabe con exactitud cuál va a ser el trazado definitivo de la Variante de Torrellano, si es que finalmente se lleva a cabo. Por eso, sería mejor esperar a que se empiece su construcción para incluirla en el mapa.
Si de verdad crees necesario incluir esta línea, sería conveniente utilizar la etiqueta railway=proposed para que no aparezca en el mapa como si estuviera en servicio.
De todos modos, para que entre en servicio (si es que entra), quedan unos cuantos años.
Un saludo.
~dsaneus
CloCkWeRX (2017-05-08 12:58:25+00:00): Any chance the rug place is "Hali Rugs" rather than Rugs Hall?
Qwertii (2017-05-09 07:37:20+00:00): Yeah looks like it is, You can see how I got the two mixed up though https://i.imgur.com/KynzHHX.png
BCNorwich (2017-05-08 11:01:38+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
On it's own a name does not give any information to the public. So I've taken the liberty of adding to your POI.
Regards Bernard
Dalkvist (2017-05-08 09:39:46+00:00): corridor do not have good support among the routers nether osmand, mapzen, or graphhopper are using it. It is not wrong just to tag them as footway instead
Aneqrs (2017-05-08 18:44:43+00:00): Thanks for the suggestion!
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-12-22 08:46:29+00:00): Hallo. Was heißt diese Node ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4841250133#map=19/49.04147/8.40448 ) "Batschka"? Und dieses Way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492064899 )? Es hat kein Tags.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-05-22 19:31:30+00:00): Jaki cel był tej zmiany? http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=692621774
rmikke (2017-05-25 09:57:44+00:00): A addr:postcode nie jest przeznaczone dla budynków (adresów), a dla ulic/miejscowości należy używać postal_code=* ?
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-05-25 10:22:12+00:00): Jak dla mnie postal_code nie ma uzasadnienia i jest niepotrzebnym robieniem zamieszania.
Jame Thomas (2017-05-08 09:00:19+00:00): Tagondaing
Endres Pelka (2017-05-20 09:46:24+00:00): May you please state CLEARLY what you're trying to map? You just keep spamming this area with meaningless named objects, and writing the same garbage in comments and diary.
ma-rt-in (2017-05-08 09:27:21+00:00): seit wann hat ein Briefkasten einen Namen?
aledec (2017-05-08 09:31:10+00:00): tut mir Leid, habe es falsch gemacht, aber wusste nicht, wie man es löschen könnte...
ma-rt-in (2017-05-08 09:40:49+00:00): 1. nutze bitte den id/potlach oder am bsten JOSM.
2. bitte schau nach der richtigen Position der Objekt, der Briefkasten habe ich gelöscht, da er a fehlerhaft war und b nicht korrekt positioniert.
Hjart (2017-05-08 10:33:20+00:00): Bemærk at de separate cykelstier her havde betydning for routing og at jeg sandsynligvis vil blive nødt til at rulle denne ændring tilbage
UffeKousgaard (2017-05-08 10:40:48+00:00): Du kan læse nærmere her: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning.
Der er tale om almindelige cykelstier anlagt parallelt med en vej, som ikke skal tegnes særskilt.