piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ma-rt-in (2019-06-13 09:25:29+00:00): Hallo,
und auch hier hast du leider sehr viele Fehler eingebaut. Der einfachhalber werde ich dieses CS nun zurücksetzen. Bitte achte auf deine Änderungen! 
vg
ma-rt-in (2019-06-13 09:27:23+00:00): Mit CS 71210275 ist diese CS zurückgesetzt!
TravGW (2019-06-12 22:44:31+00:00): Is this house really a park?
Frans S (2019-08-14 15:24:42+00:00): Hello  I reverted this changeset.
Your mappings are so inaccurate that is cost more time to correct your mappings rather than mapping them from scratch.
Best regards
maraf24 (2019-06-13 17:29:04+00:00): Skrzyżowanie autostrad?
Palolo (2019-06-26 03:57:02+00:00): Thank you for helping map Tanzania. Please note that we need to map the buildings accurately and with square corners. The instructions show how.
rene78 (2019-06-16 00:48:05+00:00): The problem now is, that people get 3 results, if they search for a hostel in this region. I personally think one node with all relevant tags at the entrance of the hostel is sufficient.
rene78 (2019-06-16 00:48:30+00:00): ...3 results for the same entry...
Thonixx (2019-06-19 08:32:10+00:00): Thanks for the input, I will correct it right away.
Frans S (2019-07-08 14:12:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. After reviewing of your mappings I have a few remarks
1. Tag buildings only as building=yes.
2. Map as precise as possible. Your mappings are far oversized and not squared. Use Maxar Imagery instead of ESRI. Much recent and better to map from
Best regards and keep mapping
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2019-06-17 09:36:10+00:00): Können wir es bitte einfach bei landcover=grass belassen? Wir haben in der Umgebung zwar noch einiges an landuse=grass Flächen, aber in der Regel ist das nicht die eigentliche Landnutzung, sondern es ist zB. hier eigentlich ein gewerbliches Grundstück, auf dem einige Flächen nicht versiegelt, sondern mit Rasen bepflanzt sind, und nicht Flächen deren primärer Sinn es ist als Gras-Anbaufläche zu dienen (und selbst dann wäre landuse=meadow in der Regel passender).

Insbesondere die Kombination:

landuse=grass
landcover=grass

ergibt so überhaupt keinen Sinn ...
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2019-06-17 09:43:52+00:00): Unter anderem haben wir dadurch jetzt wieder jede Menge landuse-Overlaps auf dem Gelände :(

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=landuseoverlap-owl&layer=overlap#52.00809,8.51465,16z
John_mapper (2019-06-18 17:22:23+00:00): Hallo Hartmut,

habe da nur das Vorgehen gewählt, dass auch Geoinfo3BI am Kesselbrink angewendet hat... Wie geht man sonst damit um? Ist ja eigentlich auch keine Fläche die als Industriefläche genutzt wird, sondern eher ein privater Park...
Palolo (2019-06-14 21:17:58+00:00): Thank you for helping map Tanzania. Please read the instructions on how to make square corners on the buildings. Also please turn on the Maxar Premium Imagery to see additional buildings that need to be traced.
MKnight (2019-11-01 14:34:15+00:00): Moin, zur Info, auf Luftbild "Sachsen unverarabeitet" kann man die Linienführung mittlerweile gut sehen.
compdude (2019-06-13 03:04:24+00:00): Congrats, your test worked! But this road is not supposed to be a motorway (that tag is for freeways) so I'm going to change it back to how it was.
viloan (2019-06-13 01:00:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
stevea (2019-06-14 11:22:02+00:00): Very pretty work!
robert (2019-06-20 20:24:51+00:00): Are you _sure_ it's ClarAnce Gardens? OS Locator seems to disagree https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=181411
Peter Newman (2019-06-23 19:56:03+00:00): Hi Robert,

I'll admit I didn't walk up to that specific street, but I did grab a photo of one of the maps in the surrounding areas as I wanted to add the name of a friend's block on there:

https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOAaTXeb4cEJqpNoISoON7NfNV4_2PB3s72O6sujxgLRX8my3Sa8PtnhA3CqAmZOQ?key=ckl2T2lhSlpuNThrYk5hSTFEeVNoZ2xwYjhSTjhB

I might be able to get them to wander past and double-check, but given that potential typo exists twice on the map, I'd be somewhat inclined to trust it.
robert (2019-06-23 22:10:24+00:00): We really shouldn't use other maps as our sources due to copyright concerns - so we tend to go by what signs say IRL.
Peter Newman (2019-06-23 22:20:51+00:00): That was a sign IRL, when does a sign become a map? Is a multi-directional signpost acceptable? Would the key from that map be acceptable for spellings at least?

I guess I need to find some fancy assistance stuff to run on Android to aid gathering such info when I'm out and about.
robert (2019-06-24 01:00:23+00:00): Some people use mapillary and quite like it.
acres1nvented (2021-08-16 15:01:09+00:00): I checked on the street sign on the ground and it's definitely Clarence with an e, I have fixed it. I find those estate maps are often not 100% accurate.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-06-13 21:58:20+00:00): hello, a levada is not a stream. it«s a canal and add usage=irrigation. please fix, take care
flylow (2019-06-29 17:13:59+00:00): Did not change/add any stream except Ribeira do Seixal in this changeset.
viloan (2019-06-13 02:05:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
fititnt (2023-04-22 23:49:25+00:00): Olá! Reparei aqui que estas novas torres de alta tensão (como esta https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6543785992)  são uma duplicada de torres te alta tensão em volta (como esta https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8420710912) que já tinham sido mapeadas meses antes.

Poderia por favor rever ?
fititnt (2023-04-23 00:11:50+00:00): Ok, também fiz um comentário no changeset do @Basstoelpel em <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99218695>. Caso queira pode comentar lá ou aqui.

E reparei (diferente do meu primeiro comentário) que na verdade você que tinha adicionado os nós primeiro.
BigKev97 (2023-08-11 00:59:34+00:00): ¿Can you please explain it in english so I can understand it? Thank you.
fititnt (2023-08-11 01:15:19+00:00): Hi! It was about repeated items from 2 users, but it already was solved by @Basstoelpel on <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99218695>.

That you! No new action is necessary. The resolution was commented on the other changeset.
yumean1119 (2019-06-14 03:17:03+00:00): Hello. Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing to HOTOSM projects!

I don't know what the hashtag #cisco_japan means, but it is obviously unsuitable for a name tag.

Using name=* tag to describe things is not a good idea. You can see about this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

I would be happy if you can fix the problem. Thank you in advance.
yumean1119 (2019-06-14 08:35:40+00:00): Checked your changesets #71242006 and #71242051. Everything looks fine. Thank you for your quick response!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
blackboxlogic (2021-02-27 17:21:29+00:00): This (and other edits in the area) have put the tag "land_area=admistrative", which seems like a mis-pelling of "administrative". Please let me know if this was on purpose, if you can fix it, or if you'd like help fixing it.
See an example of one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9683876/history
See a bunch of them: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/14eX
Dartmouthmapmaker (2021-02-28 03:57:15+00:00): could be a spelling mistake
Dartmouthmapmaker (2021-02-28 04:06:42+00:00): fixed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
Supaplex (2019-06-13 16:07:31+00:00): 有一棟建築，黏到消防栓和紅綠燈了
JOSM有Filter功能，可以過濾掉編輯時不會不應碰到的東西，請善加利用
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71201060
Supaplex (2019-06-13 16:09:04+00:00): 有一棟建築黏到消防栓和紅綠燈，需要修正。
另外，JOSM有filter功能，能夠過濾掉編輯時不會不應碰到的東西，請善加利用。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71201060
Supaplex (2019-06-13 16:10:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696802509
這邊圍起來的地方，至少四棟建築吧，確定只有一棟嗎
另外，也有偵測到建築互相重疊的狀況
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71201060
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
chachafish (2020-03-06 19:08:21+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap. There are a number of address errors in this changeset. Could you go back and correct these? Thank you :)
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-104.95053&lat=39.64587&zoom=15&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-06-13 15:30:41+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Allroads (2023-10-26 02:11:08+00:00): Hello, you deleted duobike?

Why, on that location is permitted a "duofiets" this is on a footway.

Someone did express that.
Maybe there is a better key.

Special this mobility duo bicycle is permitted.

It is  a subcategory of bicycle.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=536164684059516
Next to is a track with C15 trafficsign prohibited bicycle.

A late reaction, I just saw it today.
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-13 20:22:38+00:00): Hi Alekseykun1, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several residential roads and buildings? Thanks. For me, this does look like vandalism.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71202968

#Vandalism 
--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
Aleksandr211097 (2019-06-14 05:00:20+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch.
Do not worry. What I delete, I safely restore with the correct delineation and addresses. Thank you for understanding .
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-14 05:20:51+00:00): I really hope, that you don't redraw more or less the same objects. Because this deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-07 00:37:12+00:00): Hello TheSebik,
I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 7 months ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6544055856/history was added with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.
If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-21 21:30:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79878446 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71203357 for context.
user_5359 (2019-06-15 04:53:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your change set because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
yellowsoar (2019-06-13 15:36:11+00:00): 請停止使用國土測繪中心(NLSC)的空照圖描圖：
http://wmts.nlsc.gov.tw/wmts/PHOTO2/default/EPSG:3857/{zoom}/{y}/{x}
因為授權並不相容 OSM 所使用的 ODbL
AndersAndersson (2019-06-13 18:24:59+00:00): Vad är Svallbäcken? Bara av nyfikenhet.
tunapeter (2019-06-14 07:22:43+00:00): Området/parken kring Svallbäcksgatan kallas för det i folkmun
Galbinus (2019-11-15 14:46:31+00:00): Hallo MrWebber, die als geplant eingezeichnete B66N  wurde meiner Meinung nach deutlich zu früh eingezeichnet, da es meines Wissens noch keine konkrete Trassenplanung gibt. (Es fehlt leider auch jegliche Quellenangabe.) Vgl. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66742 zum Thema, ab welchem Planungsstand eine Straße als proposed in OSM eingetragen werden sollte.
Daher sollte die eingezeichnete geplante Straße wieder aus den OSM-Daten herausgenommen werden. OSM wird sonst von massenweise geplanten Straßen die nie realisiert werden, überflutet.
MrWebber (2019-11-18 14:03:36+00:00): Quellen ergänzt.
SHARCRASH (2020-02-03 00:03:38+00:00): Hi! There is a specific scheme for educational features: building=school for the school's buildings and amenity=school for the school's grounds. What you tagged is the building. Please see OSM's Wiki for the right tag schemes adopted by the community. Gonna correct this.
SHARCRASH (2020-02-03 00:03:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54230523/history
SHARCRASH (2020-02-03 00:04:46+00:00): Also, avoid to connect building to tags with the highway key.
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-13 20:22:15+00:00): Hi Alekseykun1, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several residential roads? Thanks. For me, this does look like vandalism.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71205759

#Vandalism 
--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
Aleksandr211097 (2019-06-14 05:01:07+00:00): Do not worry. What I delete, I safely restore with the correct delineation and addresses. Thank you for understanding .
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-14 05:20:59+00:00): I really hope, that you don't redraw more or less the same objects. Because this deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
aharvey (2019-06-13 11:56:17+00:00): I've reverted your changes for a second time now, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71181899
Pieter Vander Vennet (2019-07-05 22:41:45+00:00): Hey Bxl-forever,

While there definitively is something round in the middle... This is _not_ a roundabout. The thing behaves more as crossroads with a central island + there are no 'roundabout' signs
Pieter Vander Vennet (2019-07-05 22:42:24+00:00): I've removed the roundabout tag for now, but I would even opt to 'straighten' the roads there as that is more realistic.
bxl-forever (2019-07-05 23:28:00+00:00): If you surveyed the place recently, I suppose you must be right.  Either UrbIS 2018 aerial imagery was misleading—it really looks like a roundabout—or the place was rearranged quite recently.
oneway=yes around the central island anyway?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2019-07-05 23:28:57+00:00): I've passed there last week - and yes, the oneway is needed.
bxl-forever (2020-08-10 12:33:19+00:00): Someone "fixed" this and set junction=roundabout again.
I reverted it and added a note tag explaining the issue.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-08-17 11:47:14+00:00): I've thrown in an additional 'not:junction=roundabout' and reinstantiated the oneway
Basstoelpel (2019-06-19 16:34:38+00:00): Please be more carefull when re-tagging existing objects. A power line is not a river.
jodd (2022-02-06 23:11:37+00:00): Hallo Nmxosm,
die WC-Anlage https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5692293432 ist meiner Meinung nach öffentlich zugänglich (wenn ich mich richtig erinnere gegen Gebühr). Du hast die Toilette mit access=customers versehen. Warum denkst du denn, dass es eine Kundentoilette ist?
Danke für eine kurze Rückmeldung :-)
VG jodd
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2021-12-16 22:05:19+00:00): Hi,
Warum hast du den Gehsteig (way/588542531) zu einen Geh- und Radweg geändert? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4118143581541659 zeigt da einen lupenreinen Gehsteig.
BG Robert
eriosw (2021-12-18 10:16:24+00:00): Da dies vor 2 Jahren war kann ich mich nicht mehr genau daran erinnern. Ich bin den Weg damals abgefahren.
Ich weiß nur dass es im Bereich der Landesstraßen getrennte Rad- bzw Rad/Gehwege gibt und diese teilweise auch schmal sind. Falls meine Änderung nicht passt bitte richtigstellen. LG
Galbinus (2019-10-02 11:31:04+00:00): Die geplante Neubaustrecke B55/B1/Ortsumgehung Erwitte bei OSM einzutragen war aus meiner Sicht noch nicht sinnvoll, da die Trassenführung noch gar nicht fest steht - vgl. https://ortsumgehung-erwitte.de/
und https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66742
osmviborg (2019-06-13 09:01:10+00:00): Men ikke adressen. Genskabt.
eggie (2019-06-13 09:22:08+00:00): Tag Flassi,

Es ist schon mehrmals gesagt. Es handelt zuerst um die landuse und nicht nu um die funktion.
Jetzt is wieder die Landuse geändert in leisure =park und leisure=playground wie voriges Jahr. Weshalb?  PokemonGo?
Grüss,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-13 10:01:08+00:00): Zum Teil die Landuse zurückgelegt. Bitte nicht Landuse umtauschen für leisure=park. 
Und leisure=playground auf leisure playground hinzufügen. . 
Bitte kein parkedits auf diese Weise. 
Eggie
Flassi (2019-06-13 11:07:06+00:00): Tag Eggie,

bitte gebe mir doch die genaue Informationen zu deiner Kritik. Unten stehen doch die "Linien" mit entsprechender Nummer. Warum nutzt du diese nicht für entsprechende Kritik?

Jetzt weiß ich leider nicht, worauf du dich genau beziehst.

Ich habe gestern eine Tour durch Dinxperlo gemacht. Da ist mir das eben aufgefallen. Auch die Spielplätze, die ich hier hinzugefügt habe, existieren in echt und waren hier nicht markiert. Warum  gibt es dann die Funktion ein Spielplatz hier hinzuzufügen, wenn dies letztendlich doch nicht gewollt ist?? Und ja, Änderungen gibt es 'fortlaufend' und Spielplätze 'kommen und gehen'. Daher sollte man auch Spielplätze entfernen, wenn es diese nicht mehr gibt.

Bitte gebe mir genauere Informationen worauf du dich beziehst. Eine Gegenüberstellung von meinen 'falschen' Vorschlag und einem richtigen Vorschlag, wäre ich auch sehr dankbar. Zum Beispiel ist Welinkbos auch ein Park - so auch markiert. Es ist eben auch ein Park.

Liebe Grüße,
Flassi
eggie (2019-06-13 11:54:19+00:00): Hi Flassi,
In Julianastraat gab es ein Rasen. Das heisst Landuse. Die Spielplatz war schon auf OSM anwesend. Jetzt habe ich den Rasen besser hinzugefügt und die Spielplatz auf einem Node markiert.
Nicht alles ist Spielplatz. Und nichtSpielplatz auf Spielplatz legen. Das gibt ein Fehlermeldung. 
Das Park 700 Bomen war gut. leiure =park ist eine Decke auf dem Landuse.
Leisure=park ist ein grüne Transparent. 

Spielplatz  het Grotenhuis war gut. Es ist kein Rasen nur Spielplatz. Das habe ich nicht geändert.
Der Rasen am Beggelderdijk hatte die Landuse Rasen. (grass)  Das ist wichtig. 
Jetzt habe ich die Landuse neu hinzugefügt. Dein Park ist nog immer da. 
Es ist eine Decke über den Landuse.
Beim Anholtseweg habe ich den landuse repariert. Jetzt könst du vielleicht nog eine Decke darauf legen Leisure =park vielleicht mit Name. 
Die letzte zwei Jahren gibt es immer problemen mit "mapper" die Landuse (forest, grass, scrub)  umtauschen für Leisure = park.
Das hat mit PokemonGo zu tun. Deswegen habe ich auch gefragt: Was ist dein Motief?
Bei OSM Dutch Community halten wir Parkedits unter der Lupe.
Hier ein Beispiel von einem Parkedit... http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
Grüss,
Eggie





.
viloan (2019-06-13 08:52:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse (2019-06-28 12:48:33+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain why you've added motor_vehicle=yes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168699662 ?  It didn't look like that tag was valid based on when I was last there.  Also you've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696854736 as service road, which it isn't really - it's just an agricultural track.  You've also added no access or designation tags to that which doesn't really help anyone trying to access it.
Best Regards,
Andy