piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToniE (2021-01-28 11:05:38+00:00): Hallo haar24,

willkommen bei OSM.

Aller Anfang ist schwer, daher hier ein paar Tipps für Korrekturen.

addr:street=Blumenstraße

addr:housenumber=3

opening_hours werden in Englisch definiert, der Rest ist auch recht formal. PH meint Feiertage. Übersetzung in die jeweilige Landesprache bleibt den Tools vorbehalten.

opening_hours=Mo-Fr 08:30-12:00; Sa,Su,PH closed

opening_hours:covid19=We 15:00-18:00; Mo,Tu,Th,Fr,Sa,Su,PH closed

Man könnte das 'GmbH' noch aus 'name' rauslassen (Rechtsform nicht in Name), aber das ist Geschmackssache, oder man schreibt zusätzlich official_name=... GmbH

Bleibt noch die Frage nach office=company (allgemein) oder office=

Ohne office= wird der Eintrag auf den meisten Karten nicht erscheinen

Einen komplette Überblick findet man hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features#Amt_.2F_B.C3.BCro_.2F_Dienststelle_.2F_Gesch.C3.A4ftsstelle

Viele Grüße und viel Spass beim Mappen
Toni (aus Ottobrunn)
sabas88 (2021-01-28 22:24:56+00:00): Ciao,
in realtà esiste già la relazione del percorso escursionistico che bene o male ricalca l'acquedotto (ne ho percorso 14 km giusto domenica)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/27513
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:45:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Sanniu (2021-01-31 06:27:36+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!
You newly added access road is not connected to the rest of road network, thus make is not accessible for automatic rout algorithms. Can you, please, connect it to existing roads, where appropriate?
SekeRob (2022-09-23 08:22:09+00:00): Flagged by QA: Consider if you put restrictions on gates access=no, the ways to and after the gate also need to have their access adjusted or you create unroutable states. Not the first time.
damianeue (2022-09-23 08:27:45+00:00): Hi SekeRob, I created them because I (legally) entered the workinprogress zone and I tagged the internal ways that will become parking ways. I forgot to put access=no to the gates, will fix later.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
BCNorwich (2021-01-28 11:12:31+00:00): You are still duplicating sections of highway, please stop.
BCNorwich (2021-01-28 11:17:23+00:00): You've connected track Way: 900892148 to two streams without either a bridge or ford. You also connected track Way: 900892135 to a boundary line instead of the nearby highway Castle Lane.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-12 17:49:33+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99190065
As before, access may be impossible, but that's what access tags are for
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:44:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Nonexhudlix (2021-01-28 13:18:12+00:00): Hallo Daniel,

bitte achte darauf dass die Fußwege so mit den Straßen verbunden sind dass ein Routing möglich ist. So sind zum Beispiel tote Enden wie Punkt # 8371319794 wenig hilfreich. Auch ist ein Routing entlang der Kreuzung z.B. Knoten # 1245181680 so nicht möglich, da der Fußweg nicht mit der Straße verbunden ist.
Nonexhudlix (2021-01-28 13:19:47+00:00): Es überschneidet sich der Fußweg #901153425 mit dem Zaun #818461866 - bitte korrigieren. Danke.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:30:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Mammi71 (2021-01-28 17:47:32+00:00): Hallo Sonni1102,
willkommen bei OSM. 
Name ist ja klar, aber warum building:levels=0?
PaoloLombardi (2021-01-28 11:32:04+00:00): A tutti i mappatori CAI suggerisco di verificare di persona prima di apportare modifiche al disegno di tracciati su OSM perché forse il catasto CAI dispone anche di tracce vecchie ed obsolete. Grazie!
Basstoelpel (2021-09-05 06:27:45+00:00): Hallo RagTime_User, Photovoltaikanlage ist kein Eigenname. Kannst Du bitte endlich mal aussagekräftige Änderungssatz-Kommentare verwenden?

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
SomeoneElse (2025-02-10 17:54:21+00:00): Hello,
Are you sure that this shop is correctly located?
It seems to be in the middle of the footpath.
Best Regards,
Andy
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-02-11 07:41:59+00:00): Good morning,
Thank you for your alert. We've corrected the problem.

Best Regards
L'Equipe DB
ToniE (2021-01-28 11:59:20+00:00): Ebenso Danke. Habe noch zwei kleinere Korrekturen angebracht, die ich vergessen hatte zu erwähnen:

contact:phone=+49 89 ...

contact:website=https://...

'contact:*' ist gebräuchlicher auch wegen 'contact:instagram', 'cntact:facebook', 'contact:mobile' ... und '+49 89 ...' ist die gewollte Schreibweise.

Bei website fehlte das 'https://', was von Qualitätssicherungstools angemeckert wird.
trigpoint (2021-01-28 12:55:22+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM,

This edit appears to be rather incorrect, the marker was already correctly positioned on the hamlet and it seems very odd that you have moved it into a caravan park. This could be very misleading to map users.

I am reverting this edit.

Cheers Phil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
klnkengi (2021-02-02 23:05:05+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für die Vervollständigung der Radroute! Ich bin gerade dabei, die Mitglieder zu sortieren, damit z.B. auf waymarkedtrails.org das Höhenprofil richtig angezeigt wird. Dabei habe ich festgestellt, dass Du an den Stellen, wo die Route über Einbahnstraßen verläuft, in Richtung Norden "forward" und in Richtung Süden "backward" gesetzt hast. "Forward" und "backward" bezieht sich aber nicht auf "Hinweg" bzw. "Rückweg", sondern darauf, ob die Route in Richtung des jeweiligen Wegs verläuft (bei Einbahnstraßen also fast immer "forward"). Nur so werden die Pfeile in der Radfahrerkarte richtig angezeigt. 
lg
StefanHRT (2021-02-03 02:10:16+00:00): Hallo klnkengi,
Danke für Deinen Hinweis, da hatte ich dann tatsächlich einen Denkfehler. Ich werde dies umgehend kontrollieren und anpassen falls Du es nicht schon gemacht hast. Gruß
News General (2021-02-12 16:03:02+00:00): Antipolo 2nd district and whole Antipolo boundary please
SomeoneElse (2021-02-13 14:24:47+00:00): @News General - Asking for the things in the way that you have will not likely help.  What I'd suggest is that you subscribe to the local mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph and ask about it there.
Totor (2021-10-29 05:00:44+00:00): Hi again,
You may want to revisit this one too:
Cuenco avenue is completely offset compared to the GPS traces, and all wiggly after your edit.
https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=98295899
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98295899#map=18/10.35061/123.91309&layers=G
Regards,

Totor
AntelopeCliif (2021-11-04 00:17:37+00:00): Hi Totor, Thanks again for pointing this out! Just as the other changeset, I do see that Strava traces show some distortions in Maxar Premium imagery. I have now revisited this area and improved the alignment by using Strava.
Totor (2022-05-06 05:02:26+00:00): Great job !
highflyer74 (2021-05-07 17:25:45+00:00): Moin!

Sei so nett, Dingen nur Namen zu geben, wenn sie auch einen Eigennamen haben und nicht, um Dinge zu beschreiben. amenity=bench besagt bereits, dass es sich um eine Bank handelt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Danke und viele Grüße!
ironspock (2021-04-15 17:38:18+00:00): Hallo dx125,
der Bereich/Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345678519
ist nach meiner Meinung nicht korrekt. Die Gebäude Paracelsusstrasse 1,2 und 1a, sowie das Gebäude Ecke Paracelsus-/Forststrasse gehören definitiv nicht zur Klinik. Wahrscheinlich sind auch noch weitere betroffen.
Gruss ironspock
dx125 (2021-04-15 17:49:54+00:00): Moin ironspock,
danke für die Hinweise. Ich überprüfe gleich noch alles und bringe es dann in Ordnung. Ich hatte damals unter anderem die landuse:residential - Gebiete neu zugeschnitten. Und irgendwie sind dann da die tags vom Krankenhaus mit rein geflutscht, dass passierte beim Aufteilen oder Fusionieren... Leider habe ich es übersehen. Grüße
dx125
Johnbo (2021-01-29 10:59:38+00:00): ¡Gracias! Has añadido mucho más de lo que yo podía ver y echar en falta desde la autovía :)
UT93 (2021-01-29 22:35:00+00:00): Ich verstehe leider überhaupt nicht, was der Zweck deiner Eintragungen in OSM sein soll!
ivanbranco (2021-01-29 11:35:44+00:00): Hi,

this node doesn't have a tag who describes what it is. Should this node rappresent a school? In that case are you sure it's not a duplicated of the nearby Schulheim Langhalde?
eggie (2021-01-28 13:36:09+00:00): route =mtb toegevoegd aan relatie.
Even bicycle=yes toegevoegd zoland er geen mtb tags op de paden staan. Anders rendert het nog als reguliere  fietspaden. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-01-28 14:13:50+00:00): Waymarked Trails ligt stil met z'n rendering vandaag. Dus even afwachten.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
UT93 (2021-01-29 22:33:46+00:00): Ich verstehe leider überhaupt nicht, was der Zweck deiner Eintragungen in OSM sein soll!
bxl-forever (2021-01-29 10:08:01+00:00): I reverted this changeset.
Thierry1030 (2021-01-29 19:30:40+00:00): hello bxl-forever,
this is a new user that I apparently convinced to make an account :-)
can you tell me what was wrong with the changeset? I'm asking because I see that you reverted it.
thank you in advance!
bxl-forever (2021-01-29 21:10:49+00:00): In this changeset the user created a long footway along the path he/she had been walking.  This footway was duplicating existing footways or streets, and it didn’t look like a valid contribution to the map.  It was either duplicating existing information, adding wrong information (e.g. mistaking cycleway=asl for highway crossings) or just cluttering the map with incorrect connectors.
We regularly come across new users believing they can add some private stuff, not realizing they are actually editing a public database.  This is what it looked like.
I left a private message to the user.  I will be happy to provide help or guidance if necessary.
Thierry1030 (2021-01-29 21:39:57+00:00): ok thx for the info. 
I talked some weeks ago to the mobility service of Anderlecht in response to a road closure where we received some complaints from cyclists.
I asked them to add comments when roads would be closed for longer time or for other modifications in road network. I'm not sure if it's them, but I will send them an email to be sure ... :-)
UT93 (2021-01-29 22:34:45+00:00): Ich verstehe leider überhaupt nicht, was der Zweck deiner Eintragungen in OSM sein soll!
literan (2021-01-28 15:06:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Нет, это не терминал кривой и изогнутый, а снимки кривые (и так нередко бывает, увы, особенно с Maxar). Придется откатить правку.

Посмотрите на гуглоснимках или яндексе - везде терминал ровный.

И вот еще почитайте, пожалуйста, на всякий случай, если не в курсе: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков
ZinaidaZ (2021-01-28 16:02:54+00:00): Да, я в курсе о снимках, спасибо. Основной целью было исправить некруглый конец на круглый. Он круглый и на яндексе, и на гугле, и на бинге
literan (2021-01-28 16:14:19+00:00): переделаете? или мне? тут еще и дорожка вдоль этого терминала кривая..
ZinaidaZ (2021-01-28 16:28:58+00:00): Переделала, посмотрите https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98308109
literan (2021-01-28 16:33:06+00:00): неплохо, но дорога не смотрится, ее бы тоже круглой сделать )
ZinaidaZ (2021-01-28 16:38:30+00:00): ок)
!bm (2021-01-28 13:51:42+00:00): Hallo br4nnigan,

vielen Dank, habe es korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5105895219/history

--besteGrüße!bm
eggie (2021-01-28 14:38:33+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. 
Kleine aanpassing gedaan. De info samengevoegd met de reeds bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:33:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
ququruzka (2021-01-29 15:00:26+00:00): добрий день. 
ви би нге могли писати більш точніші коментарії до своїх правок ? 
"все" - це нічого не означає точно.
GerdP (2023-09-25 07:10:45+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich kann's leider auf meinem Foto nicht gut erkennen, aber für mich sieht es so aus, als ob man auf diesem Weg https://www.osm.org/way/280485708 mit dem Auto weiter zur B51 fahren könnte. Ist dort ein Schild oder sonst was, welches das verbietet?
ndm (2021-01-28 19:34:45+00:00): Thanks for adding 4 semi-detached houses in Bristol - very hard to see that when the changeset is so large - always good to save each local edit before the next one.

I'm going to tweak the Bristol houses slightly so that they share a joint wall and square them up -- there's usually a setting on editors to help with that.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
ftcat (2021-02-04 06:05:50+00:00): Hi Becky Candy,

This is not water but a seasonal wetland known in Zambia and Zimbabwe as a dambo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dambo, as you can see from the Wikipedia page they take many forms and are an important natural feature in Zambia. Very hard to classify with the existing OSM tags as during the dry season they are dry grasslands and burn with wildfires, showing up as black areas in satellite imagery, during the wet season, particularly very wet years, may be more than ankle deep in water and have a small stream running through them or to the edge of them. They may also have a shallow pool of water in the lowest point known as a pan, as these pans start to dry out the local villagers will plant vegetable gardens in them and around the edges of them, these are sometimes visible in the imagery. Dambos are very often found at the headwaters of many small streams and these streams only start to run once the dambos have become water logged so often only start running towards the end of the wet season such as now.
Rogoyski (2021-02-23 18:36:28+00:00): Harendy/Goryczkowa/Cyrhli/Czerowych Wierchów/Białej Wody/parafia w Grabowie: przecież tu nie ma żadnych "turning circles".
syntex (2021-02-23 19:36:11+00:00): Wiem, byłem tam. Już poprawiam, miałem okres, gdy dodawałem za dużo tych turning_circle.
Rogoyski (2021-02-23 23:22:43+00:00): Dzięki :)
HellMap (2022-09-08 22:25:29+00:00): Hi!

A piste route should not be multiple relations with different values, rather the `piste:xxx` tags should be on the paths/tracks (or dedicated piste ways).[1]

I merged the route into a single relation and moved the values onto the relevant ways in [2] The route covers the whole "ski track", but individual ways signify the actual difficulty. (iD doesn't render this, but JOSM does.)

One thing is that I did not move the `lit=yes` tag from one of the routes[3] to ways because I am fairly sure some ways in it were not actually lit. Plus, the other piste segments were not tagged for `lit` at all, yet sections are part of the same tracks/paths. This makes me doubt that we can assume they are lit. We probably need a survey for that.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=piste#Tags_for_the_associated_ways
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125959596
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11912487
DaxServer (2021-01-28 14:45:21+00:00): Revert from https://osmcha.org/changesets/91606413 and https://osmcha.org/changesets/91606468
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98301184
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-03-15 11:28:18+00:00): Hallo S_Torre,

Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/901206040 een hondenlosloopweide? In dat geval wordt dit beter aangeduid met `leisure=dog_park`. Ik heb dit alvast aangepast omdat dit op het eerste zicht zo lijkt te zijn, maar dat wil ik nog eens dubbelchecken met je.

Mvg, Pieter
DaxServer (2021-01-28 14:27:55+00:00): Revert from https://osmcha.org/changesets/91296719
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98301356
Carto'Cité (2021-02-22 16:57:29+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces ajouts. 
Je ne connaissais pas (ou re-découvre ?) le tag highway=corridor. Je pense toutefois qu'ici highway=footway est plus adapté, mais j'y ai ajouté location=underground. On peut bien sûr en débattre :-)
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoTransilien
benoitdd (2021-02-23 18:27:10+00:00): le corridor vient sans doute du schema indoor mapping, mais peut-être adapté uniquement à des surfaces? 
le underground semble toujours générer des erreurs d'intersections dans iD avec les éléments en surface, j'avoue atteindre mes limites de compréhension du la gestions des couches entre layers, levels et location.
Carto'Cité (2021-02-24 09:30:02+00:00): Je pense que tu atteins surtout les limites de iD. Pour des données complexes c'est pas mal de passer à JOSM. C'est un peu intimidant au début, mais on y prend goût puis on ne peut plus s'en passer :-)
Antoine.
spiregrain (2021-01-28 17:39:28+00:00): I always have to think quite hard about this one when it pops up on StreetComplete.  Like you've done here, I say "No" if the ramp is mapped separately.
rskedgell (2021-01-28 19:44:29+00:00): Yes, it could be worded it little better in the app to give ramp=separate as a more obvious option when there are nearby short ways with highway=cycleway|footway + incline=* 

Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98317186
spiregrain (2021-01-31 17:16:32+00:00): I've added this one - https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2543
chnuessli (2021-01-29 06:28:28+00:00): Guten Morgen, sicher dass diese Tags wie amenity und healtcare weg sollten? Lg Christian
Piz Pachific (2021-02-27 13:17:23+00:00): Sorry, erst jetzt gesehen. Ich habe diese Tags nur von den Gebäuden entfernt und auf die umgebende Fläche konsolidiert. Duplikate sind nicht optimal.
eggie (2021-01-28 14:53:12+00:00): Beste Coolmeesje.. Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus met editor iD.
Dit geeft vaak schade. 
We zetten in OSM geen adressen en bedrijfsinfo op gebouwen. Daar zijn de adresnodes voor. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-28 14:58:01+00:00): Beide macs staan nu 2x getagd op de kaart?
eggie (2021-01-28 15:08:51+00:00): Het adres Dordrecht Noord en de bedrijfsinfo heb ik van het gebouw verwijderd. Het was al hier  goed getagd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-28 15:24:57+00:00): Altijd goed om de boel actueel te maken.
Het water bij de Mac A16 heb ik even verplaatst en alle info maar meteen op de adresnode gezet.
MVG
eggie
Coolmeesje (2021-01-28 15:35:09+00:00): Het is inderdaad fijn om alles actueel te houden, nog fijner dat er altijd iemand is die wijzigingen controleert op de OSM-standaarden :-)
eggie (2021-01-28 15:41:45+00:00): Mooi...   'k Heb nog even die parkeerplaats aangepast na de reconstructie bij de A16 MAC. 
Ik gebruik www.satellietdataportaal.nl
18 aug 2020 is zonder wolken.
Links klik je op het kleine zwarte blokje.
Dan een vlak opentrekken op je scherm en dan onderin bij de verticale strepen een foto zonder wolken zoeken.  :)
De laatste foto s van 1 jan 2021 in deze regio. 
gr eggie
ququruzka (2021-01-29 15:00:14+00:00): добрий день. 
ви би нге могли писати більш точніші коментарії до своїх правок ? 
"все" - це нічого не означає точно.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
user_6110846 (2021-03-12 07:16:56+00:00): ти як мапиш школи перестань 1 дурницю робити 

а саме   наносити адресу школи на будівлі школи 

Адресу школи запамятай треба наносити  на увесь полігон школи лише 1 раз
Yalvex (2021-03-12 08:55:31+00:00): Привіт! В ОСМ Вікі, чомусь, навпаки написано робити.

"Адреса вказується на основній будівлі школи, у випадку наявності адрес в інших будівель на території школи, вони зазначаються на них відповідно."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#.D0.9F.D0.BE.D0.B7.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.87.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8F_.D1.88.D0.BA.D1.96.D0.BB_.D0.B2_.D0.A3.D0.BA.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.97.D0.BD.D1.96

Чи ви маєте краще джерело інформації по тегуванню?
user_6110846 (2021-09-24 15:10:11+00:00): інструкціі написані на п яну голову треба ігнорити
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.