piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2017-04-07 17:09:55+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast leider den bereits existierenden Eintrag für das Restaurant übersehen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4692617945) Ich habe deshalb Deinen Änderungssatz zurückgenommen.
DD1GJ (2017-04-06 19:41:56+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 (vermutlich am Wochenende) verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-07 06:37:19+00:00): Hi  olivmi,

Is there any reason behind the modification of the name of the bridge from Gäubahn to Stockerbachviadukt?

Regards,

Upendra.
EneaSuper (2017-04-07 06:19:58+00:00): In cosa consiste?
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-04-07 06:34:23+00:00): Qualcuno per sbaglio aveva ruotato di circa 90° l'area di Piazza Matteotti con tutte le strade attaccate creando visivamente un bel casino. Fortunatamete mi sono accorto che il problema era solo la rotazione e con Josm l'ho risolta in un minuto
EneaSuper (2017-04-07 07:24:36+00:00): Capito, grazie :o
mavl (2017-04-15 08:23:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
kreuzschnabel (2018-01-23 20:09:50+00:00): Hinweis: Abbiege- und Einfädelspuren werden nicht als separate Ways gemappt, sondern per turn:lanes=* an den Way getaggt. Separate Ways bitte nur bei baulicher Trennung (d.h. mindestens Leitplanke).
lkw (2018-01-24 20:49:14+00:00): Das mache ich mittlerweile richtig.
kreuzschnabel (2018-01-25 07:48:03+00:00): alles klar, dann weiter so :) viele wissen es halt nicht, mappen munter drauflos und ein Navi kann dann raten, auf welchem der drei parallelen Ways es sich denn jetzt befindet.
datendelphin (2017-04-06 18:35:39+00:00): Hi

Why did you remove the bridge tag?  Two roads are crossing there without an intersection, so one of them must be either a bridge or a tunnel.

Also, please use meaningful changeset comments. In this changeset you didn't add anything, you changed geometries, and removed the bridge tag. For example write: improved geometry of the green and of the track.
user_3216889 (2017-04-06 20:02:50+00:00): Welkom op OSM

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-06 22:14:48+00:00): Wanneer je de luchtfoto van de bing 2011 omwisselt voor de kadaster pdok 2016 kun je al veel meer zien. Leisure park heb ik even veranderd in landuse = village_green. Parken worden als cover over de landuse heengelegd. best lastig hier.
De url voor de pdok 2016 is 
http://whoots.mapwarper.net/tms/{zoom}/{x}/{y}/Actueel_ortho25/http://geodata.nationaalgeoregister.nl/luchtfoto/wms?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=Actueel_ortho25&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}
Je kunt nog beter overstappen naar JOSM.. daar zit die foto al ingebakken.
JulSeb (2017-04-07 07:00:18+00:00): HenkL en eggie, dank voor opmerkingen/aanpassingen
SHARCRASH (2017-11-20 08:53:37+00:00): Hi! You created this inaccessible path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485193584/history Is it really not accessible even by foot? Can you give a description, please?
danny__kay (2017-11-20 19:05:15+00:00): Hi Sharcrash,
you are right.  I've altered the designation.
Regards,
Dan Kelly
SHARCRASH (2017-11-23 14:29:54+00:00): Thanks for the reply. Further more, if you ever walked that track, isn't it connected to this path http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39666540 , since it goes to the same direction?
danny__kay (2017-11-24 14:41:24+00:00): Hi Sharcrash,
I looked on geoprtail.lu and they don't show the paths joining, so I guess that's right.
SHARCRASH (2017-11-24 14:51:04+00:00): OK i had hoped you were there. I had been a logn time ago and stayed on the main path. Sometimes Geoportail.lu is not faithful to reality. I had occasions where i had to add a "note" tag to let contributors know that Geoportail is incorrect and they should not copycat wrongly.
user_3216889 (2017-04-06 20:10:34+00:00): Gelieve geen naam toe te voegen aan een playground, tenzij er een bordje bijstaat met die naam (name enkel voor officiële namen, niet voor functies/specificaties).
Een specificatie van het 'speelobject' kun je eventueel toevoegen met playground=xx;
zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
Maar meestal doen we dat niet, omdat er vaak meerdere objecten vlak bij elkaar staan, en ook het soort object nogal eens aan verandering onderhevig is (en dan moet zo'n verandering ook weer door iemand opgemerkt en in OSM verwerkt worden).

Dus in de praktijk vrijwel altijd enkel: leisure=playground.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
arcanma (2017-04-08 14:47:26+00:00): *Consigli per nuovo utente* Il nome="Officina Meccanica" è generico, se si tratta di un'officina di riparazione auto l'etichetta è shop=car_repair, per altri tipi di officina vedere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:craft.
(Es. craft=metal_construction)
Polarbear (2017-07-07 21:21:13+00:00): Hallo, was ist das denn für ein seltsames MP-Gebilde, dem du den Namen "Neue Wiesen" gegeben hast?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4709806
Der Name basiert offenbar auf einem Objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28361276/history in v.3 von 2008, als es noch 4,7 qkm Hochgebirgsvegetation (natural=fell) war. Das MP ist erst 2015 dazu angelegt worden, im nördlichen Teil als durchgängige Fläche, im südlichen Teil der Untergrund unter Wegen unter Aussparung der Felder. 

In den Luftbildern 2009-2016 sehe ich aber immer Ackerfurchen auch im nördlichen Teil. 

Der eigentliche Stadtrandpark "Neue Wiesen" ist hingegen nur 12 Ha = 0.12 qkm gross. http://www.berliner-zeitung.de/park-ist-zwoelf-hektar-gross--neue-wiesen--in-karow-nord-eroeffnet-16590338 - kurioserweise ist dieser eigentliche Park aus dem Monster-MP als 'inner" ausgespart.
emvee (2017-07-08 07:07:16+00:00): Hi Polarbear,

Reading German is not really a problem for me but writing takes much more time, so excuse me for answering in English.

The Berliner Zeitung article indeed gives the name "Stadtrandpark Neue Wiesen" to the 12 Ha = 0.12 qkm area but it seems to me more than the park is called "Neue Wiesen", see for example https://www.verden.de/regional/gebiete/baugebiet-neue-wiesen-900000001-20680.html?titel=Baugebiet+Neue+Wiesen

The only thing I did was indeed moving the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28361276/history to the MP as the areas did overlap.

If there is better information on what the limit is of "Neue Wiesen" I would be good to update the openstreetdata; reverting the change will not improve things I think.
Polarbear (2017-07-08 10:28:10+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. The Verden link you provide refers to a town in Lower Saxony, about 350 km away from Berlin! This is completely unrelated. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/60942472
As the newspaper about the park opening in Berlin-Karow cites the organisers to have the name adopted from a regional landscape name in undisclosed historic maps, I checked a map archive reaching back to 1860, where no such naming could be found. 
The general problem with mechanically "fixing" things, including modernising the MP tagging style, is that it propagates mapping mistakes, and gives them a new and current "paint". Often mistakes were made by inexperienced mappers, and fixing them should dig into the roots of the problem and not just adjust the tagging style. 
In the specific case, I'll resolve the MP and map the 12ha park appropriately, derived from local information.
emvee (2017-07-08 11:32:46+00:00): Hi Polarbear,

Yes, the link to the Baugebiet Neue Wiesen was an error, but doing some more searching I think the Neue Wiesen in Berlin is not only the 12 ha park, see for instance http://www.stiftung-naturschutz.de/fileadmin/img/pdf/Kleine_Anfragen/S17-13193.pdf:

"LSG  42  Neue  Wiesen, 
Verordnung  zum  Schutz  der 
Landschaft  der  Neuen  Wiesen  im  Bezirk  Köpenick  von 
Berlin vom 3. April 1995, GVBl. S. 237, 76,52ha"

While I make errors for sure I think this was not an mistake, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28361276/history#map=14/52.6036/13.4991 clearly show that the whole area was called "Neue Wiesen" before this change.

Based on your comment I agree that likely not the whole area is called "Neue Wiesen" but probably it is good to contact @osmwandl because he/she added the name to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28361276 eight years ago. 

Would be good to see what was the area when he made the change but I can not find a tool to do that (http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=737385 is erroring out) It might be also good to contact other users that edited way 28361276 after that (@hagax, @Schisch, @g0ldfish, @Papalinux, @Verkersrot, @atpl_pilot, @geozeisig and @anbr as the edited the way and might know more.
Polarbear (2017-07-08 19:15:56+00:00): LSG 42 Neue Wiesen is again a mismatch, it is in Berlin's district of Köpenick, mapped here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35282169
The object in discussion is half in the district of Pankow, half in the state of Brandenburg, county Barnim.
emvee (2017-07-08 21:27:55+00:00): After I wrote my last reply I did read this Dutch article https://www.trouw.nl/home/waarom-je-in-berlijn-eenvoudig-onvindbaar-bent~ae8e2be7/, eight Berlinerstraße and minimal two "Neue Wiesen's. Based on that I will stop searching for information on "Neue Wiesen" in Berlin. ;-)

Wat about the rest of the previous reply I wrote? It is good fun to find errors but in the end it would be good to agree on how to solve the problem you flagged.
Polarbear (2017-07-15 17:13:44+00:00): Fixed in CS 50309693, no response from the original mapper.
emvee (2017-07-16 07:46:21+00:00): Thanks for checking and fixing!
!bm (2021-04-29 21:55:11+00:00): I have stumbled upon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4090028 (and thus this changeset) tagged w/ natural=wood (amidst landuse=forest) and name=Referenzfläche – I doubt this to be correct. 

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2644552 (same as here in German)
emvee (2021-05-01 07:42:27+00:00): I did react in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2644552 but this is once more a side effect of moving the name tag from the outer way to the relation.

If you are sure things are incorrect and know how to correct it, please do so.
arcanma (2017-04-08 14:33:41+00:00): *Consigli per nuovo utente* Forse highway=service è più appropriato rispetto a highway=unclassified. Il name="Strada privata" non è corretto, per identificare la strada come privata aggiungere access=private se è possibile accedervi solo con il permesso del proprietario, access=permissive se la strada è privata ma è accessibile senza particolari permessi, access=destination se l'accesso è riservato ai residenti. Vedere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access
DoDoMR (2017-04-06 20:08:52+00:00): Könntest _Du bitte erläutern, was sich hinter Deinen Änderungen verbirgt?!
Die von Dir eingetragene "Sprachschule" ist in OSM bereits enthalten. Dieses würde ich daher wieder rausnehmen.
Ein Hostel "meine house" existiert m.W. in Marburg nicht - könnte es sein, dass es sich hierbei um Deine eigene Wohnung handelt, die über entsprechende Portale (z.B. "airbnb") vermietet wird?!
BeKri (2017-04-07 00:13:28+00:00): Dahinter verbirgt sich ein typischer Maps.me Eintrag mit viel Blödsinn.
Ich lösche sowas kommentarlos.
DoDoMR (2017-04-07 04:33:25+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis - habe erst hinterher gesehen, das Maps.me dahintersteckt. Die notwendigen Korrekturen habe ich bereits vorgenommen.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
5m4u9 (2017-04-15 03:15:20+00:00): hola \o. volviste a cambiar la jerarquía de calles/avenidas sin debatir. la carretera internacional a sacaba como calle residencial de barrio? no tiene mucho sentido.

revertí los cambios.
arcanma (2017-04-08 14:12:07+00:00): Il nome "Edificio" non serve, c'è letichetta building=yes. L'etichetta name va utilizzata per il nome proprio dell'oggetto
DD1GJ (2017-04-06 19:41:05+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 (vermutlich am Wochenende) verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Lori Longmire (2017-04-06 19:52:12+00:00): #amm
DD1GJ (2017-04-06 21:58:35+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 (vermutlich am Wochenende) verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
DD1GJ (2017-04-06 21:58:05+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 (vermutlich am Wochenende) verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
ndm (2017-04-06 23:00:20+00:00): Is this copied from the website -- they have a "warning" notice:

"This entire site © BM Services and UKMotorhomes.net. If you wish to reproduce any information published here, including copying to online discussion groups or forums, please make a request via our contact form. Information reproduced without our express permission is an infringement of copyright and we may take action against anyone so doing. Direct links to our pages are welcome."
chillly (2017-04-07 11:36:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail. Your park tagging is a bit confused. You have added conflicting tags to a single area. If there is a park tag that. If there is some woods too draw another area (maybe inside the park) and tag that as woods, and so on. Natural tree is for a single tree, not a an area. An area would be natural woods.

If you need any help, please feel free to ask
BeckyLBillings (2017-04-07 17:20:21+00:00): I apologises for any mistakes I have made. going to get rid of some things. is there anything I can watch that would help? the tutorial is not that bad but it doesn't exactly go into detail.
chillly (2017-04-07 17:32:32+00:00): Don't apologise, OSM can be tricky to understand at first. 

It's a long time since I started, so I'm not sure what there is for beginners. Have a go, mistakes can be corrected. Don't be afraid of changing your own work. If it all goes really badly I will remove your stuff for you to start again, but I doubt it will come to that. 

In general, everything has one main tag, ( such as natural, landuse, building, highway ...). Things can have names, but not all need them. Don't use the name to describe things (a common beginner mistake). Join up roads and paths. Don't join areas (such as a park) to a road alongside of it - they are separate. Zoom in to draw things as accurately as you can. 

Have a go - we welcome new mappers and expect a few mistakes while you learn. 

One problem though. You can get hooked, it is addictive.
chillly (2017-04-07 17:48:42+00:00): I have had http://learnosm.org/en/ recommended to me for beginners.

Hope that helps.
eggie (2017-04-06 22:16:37+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-06 22:17:33+00:00): Henk was me voor :)
user_3216889 (2017-04-06 21:13:25+00:00): Welkom op OSM

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Vriendelijke groet,
Henk L.
user_3216889 (2017-04-06 21:17:02+00:00): Als de weg 'eigen weg' is heeft het meestal geen naam, of staat er een naambord?
Zo nee, dan name=*** verwijderen. Verder OK.
nammala (2017-06-12 04:21:37+00:00): Hi Margarita,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have added area over buildings which is not appropriate. Make sure you add valid data on map. OSM is the real map of the world the data we add should be ground truth.

Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
ndm (2017-04-06 23:00:27+00:00): Is this copied from the website -- they have a "warning" notice:

"This entire site © BM Services and UKMotorhomes.net. If you wish to reproduce any information published here, including copying to online discussion groups or forums, please make a request via our contact form. Information reproduced without our express permission is an infringement of copyright and we may take action against anyone so doing. Direct links to our pages are welcome."
p3et (2017-04-08 10:00:08+00:00): Thanks for the hint. I'll ask them for permission.
trigpoint (2017-04-08 12:56:07+00:00): The mapping of these also feels wrong. They seem to be existing car parks, so the tag should (if allowed, although there is a pretty big notice saying it must not be copied) be added a tags to the existing objects. However the site uses google maps which makes the data incompatible with OSM even if permission is given by the website.
Unless you have actually visited these places and confirmed that overnight parking is allowed I feel that this should be reverted.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
unsungNovelty (2017-04-07 07:21:57+00:00): Hi Ryan Crappa,

Welcome to the OpenStreetMap world :)

I can see that you have added a lot of building=residential by tagging multiple buildings. There are two ways to tag these buildings as residential. One is to map/trace each building individually and tag each of them as building=residential. The second is the easiest way you can draw the a boundary covering all the buildings and then tagging them as landuse=residential, I have correct the data using the second method. Going forward you can do the same too if you find it difficult to map buildings individually. If you want some guidance on mapping, you can always comment on this changeset or direct message me. I will be more than happy to help :)

You can also go through this beginners guide which will give you a better perspective about OpenStreetMap - http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/.

Happy mapping,
Nikhil Prabhakar
daganzdaanda (2017-04-10 16:50:15+00:00): Hallo Druschi, willkommen bei OSM!

Danke, dass du hier Details ergänzt!
Bei der Glaserei hast du es aber zu gut gemeint: Die ist jetzt drei mal in den Daten. Kannst du die drei Punkte zusammenfassen? 

Für einen Rahmenladen gibt es shop=frame ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dframe ), für eine Glaserei wäre craft=glaziery gut ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:craft%3Dglaziery ). Das kann man gut an einem Punkt kombinieren. Wenn die Glaserei hier nicht produziert sondern nur verkauft, könntest du auch shop=glaziery nehmen, kombiniert wäre das dann shop=frame;glaziery

Im Wiki findest du fast immer einen passenden Tag, und wenn nicht, dann frag im Forum nach: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Wenn maps.me an seine Grenzen kommt, probier doch mal iD oder besser noch JOSM als Editor. Danke nochmal, und viel Spaß beim mappen!
literan (2017-04-07 14:03:28+00:00): Лечебный центр это не больница, вроде (да и задвоили вы amenity)
literan (2017-04-07 14:04:12+00:00): ну и industrial вы некорректно нанесли, включив туда двор дома 5 и тротуары.
literan (2017-04-07 14:08:22+00:00): и по поводу дома 7 - там что, действителньо стройка началась? три недели назад ничего не было. В любом случае, вы тут в стройку включили и тротуары, что тоже неверно
literan (2017-04-07 14:11:32+00:00): а здесь зачем было вешать (задублировав саму церковь) amenity=place_of_worship на территорию, включающую в себя гараж, туалет и магазин? Зачем с НИИ глазных болезней было убирать теги НИИ и больницы? Откачу.
althio (2018-01-20 07:47:24+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/47521228
Alexander-II (2017-04-11 03:17:08+00:00): Хватит вандалить. Продолжите - вас ждет бан. Займитесь полезным, а не деструктивным.