piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
mariotomo (2022-05-20 22:41:11+00:00): hola. con esta edición borraste toda la información relativa a la Basílica Menor Jesús Nazareno de Atalaya.  voy a mejorarlo, pero cuidado las próximas veces, gracias.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98133091
Roadsguy (2021-02-06 18:23:35+00:00): Do you have a source for these turn restrictions? Having driven this stretch of road, there is no signage indicating these turn restrictions, and to restrict left turns would certainly defeat the purpose of the median breaks that are already mapped.
DUGA (2021-02-07 17:35:21+00:00): Hello, can we talk in Slack? I'm very confused with the changeset interface and I could not figure out which one you mentioned with issue.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
DaveF (2021-01-25 19:35:15+00:00): Hi
Do you have local knowledge for these edits?
It's unclear from your ambiguous comment "I have fixed a mistake" Please be more detailed, here & when closing a note.
datendelphin (2021-01-26 19:25:37+00:00): Zubringerdienst ist "destination" oder "delivery", "designated" ist fast das Gegenteil, Strasse speziell für diesen Transport Typ :)
dippeling (2021-01-26 20:00:50+00:00): Hola! Reingefallen bei den englischen d-Wörtern. 😩
FraukeLeo (2021-03-26 19:41:11+00:00): Hallo GeoRobJ, bitte nicht einfach ohne Ortskenntnis aus veralteten Luftbildern abmalen. Das Gebäude zu https://osm.org/way/899947514 ist seit Jahren abgerissen und wurde daher aus den Daten gelöscht. Du hast es wieder eingetragen. Schade um die Mühe :)
user_5359 (2021-01-25 17:18:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of the address node https://www.osm.org/node/596458635, because you move him more than 100 meter.

If you need help to corrected: You are welcome.
rskedgell (2021-01-25 17:34:14+00:00): Thanks for fixing this. It might have been helpful if you used a changeset comment other than "I have fixed an event" or had left a comment when you closed https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2037161
user_12328418 (2021-04-22 17:42:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2633255
Kannst du es bitte überarbeiten?
user_5359 (2021-01-26 20:02:42+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/26292518: What is the meaning of the key mame?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-01-26 21:51:29+00:00): this is probably a bug. I've got resolve it!
user_5359 (2021-01-27 16:28:19+00:00): Please also a look on http://www.osm.org/way/26537210: bname?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-01-27 18:48:08+00:00): corrected
marczoutendijk (2021-01-25 20:04:51+00:00): Can you explain the meaning of your changeset comment "a"?
Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Nielkrokodil (2021-02-01 20:06:07+00:00): Ich habe für die Covid-Teststation den Tag geändert nach dem aktuellen Proposal dazu: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/healthcare%3Dsample_collection
Bathyscapher (2021-02-02 12:52:24+00:00): Sehr gut, danke!
Carnildo (2021-01-26 08:01:42+00:00): Please don't abbreviate street names.  It's easy enough for a computer to construct an abbreviation if it needs to save space, but it's impossible to go the other way.  (For example, should "St" be expanded to "Street", "State", or "Saint"?)
Dimacn (2021-01-27 06:33:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Карта OSM - это карта существующих в реальности объектов. То что вы добавили подпадает под вандализм и будет отменено.
mariotomo (2021-01-29 20:12:29+00:00): hola Gabriel, bienvenido a OSM.
gracias por contribuir al mapa.
ten en cuenta que otros maperos ven tus ediciones y que es buena práctica explicar cuál fue el enfoque de cada conjunto de cambios.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
consulente_finanziario (2021-02-02 17:46:40+00:00): Il tracciato in questione è oggetto di una segnalazione agli organi competenti per violazioni anche perchè pericoloso. La traccia va cancellata perchè non conforme alle norme di OSM. Invito l'autore a provvedere immediatamente anche per evitare che OSM venga citata dai Provvedimenti relativi delle Autorità cosa che andrebbe a danno dell'intera Comunità di OSM.
loretrango (2021-02-04 17:18:43+00:00): ma chi sei? :)
Consulente finanziario?
consulente_finanziario (2021-02-10 21:49:08+00:00): e te chi sei ?
consulente_finanziario (2021-02-10 21:53:07+00:00): anzi, non me lo dire chi sei ...
Lo scoprirà chi di dovere chi sei. Io ti dico che nell'interesse tuo , della comunità dei mappatori e della credibilità di OSM, faresti meglio a cancellare la traccia. Poi fai come ti pare.
Saluti
consulente_finanziario (2021-03-24 14:51:13+00:00): salve , sono di nuovo io.... non so se hai seguito le evoluzioni su facebook; in ogni caso ti aggiorno. 
Non c'è solo il Comune di Prato ad essere chiamato a dare spiegazioni su questo pseudo itinerario (pseudo perchè non esiste il Sentiero fisico o quanto meno non esisteva prima della sistemazione della segnaletica abusiva) e l'abuso non riguarda solo la segnaletica. Il Gruppo Autogestito anonimo s'è dileguato/trasformato in qualcosa di ben diverso .... insomma il fatto che sia stato formalizzato un esposto ufficiale , che gli Enti chiamati a rispondere sono più di uno, che in gioco ci può essere ben oltre che qualche segnaletica, ribadisco l'opportunità , nell'interesse della Comunità OSM , di cancellare questa traccia ancor prima che le autorità si esprimano eventualmente per la "chiusura" e prima che qualcuno si faccia male (il che complicherebbe enormemente la posizione di tutti i "Promotori" della Ovest - ripeto alcuni si sono già ravveduti. In un gioco classico gioco all' italiana di scaricabarile sei sicuro che nessuno per difendersi da accuse importanti non vada affermando che il corresponsabile della pubblicità della Ovest sia il Contributors OSM? Credi che nella Comunità ci siano persone che ti sosterrebbero in una eventuale diatriba investigativa importante?
ToniE (2021-01-25 17:12:14+00:00): Sorry, meinte: 

MVV Bus 452: check/fix nach Fahrplanwechsel

Münchner Verkehrs- und Tarifverbund GmbH (MVV); GTFS vom 10.12.2020
eggie (2021-01-25 17:21:47+00:00): Beste  Comitatus

Hier klopt iets niet.
Dit zijn je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98135979

De track is getagd als zijnde surface=paving_stones  en de bijbehorende tracktype=grade1
Je hebt er nu surface=gravel van gemaakt. Dat is niet te fietsen...
en bij gravel hoort tracktype=grade2
(half verhard)
Goed fietsbaar is wel fine_gravel

De vraag is wat is het nu?
Straatstenen of grof gravel? Dat is nogal een verschil.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-25 17:26:40+00:00): Wanner het dus gravel is tracktype=grade2 taggen

En gravel in OSM is wel heel erg grof
Is het geen fine_gravel  Dat is goed fietsbaar met een normale fiets.
eggie (2021-01-25 18:40:17+00:00): reverted by changeset #98139411

Je hebt verder niet meer gereageerd. Dit is een fietsroute en die zou niet meer goed routeren met jouw tagging gravel.
De route is gewoon bestraat. De voorgaande mapper is een lokale mapper.
Je geeft zelf aan prima te fietsen, waarom de weg dan omgetagd naar gravel? 
MVG
eggie
Comitatus (2021-01-25 19:08:03+00:00): het is een gravelpad (fijn), alleen eerste 10m zijn bestraat.
eggie (2021-01-25 19:11:42+00:00): Oke..  Dan pas ik het even aan, want er loopt een fietsroute hier en die kun je niet splitsen met een simpele editor als iD.

Dan gaat de routerelatie stuk. 
Je moet straks maar even kijken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-25 19:17:52+00:00): Fietsroute gesplitst,..
Aangepast eerste stukje tracktupegrade1 = paving_stones  De rest tracktype=grade2 surface = fine_gravel
De fietskaart (OFM)  zal het als goed fietsbaar behandelen. 

Bedakt voor je reactie,
eggie
eggie (2021-01-25 18:08:32+00:00): Beste Bert,

In OSM zijn van die regels.
We hebben adresnodes en gebouwen. Die zijn import vanuit de BAG
Beter niets aan die gebouwen veranderen. 
Er wordt periodiek geupdated. 
Dat gaat fout als je zelf gaat aanpassen. 
De adresnodes zijn belangrijk voor de vindbaarheid. We taggen geen adresinfo op de omtrek van het gebouw. 
Een luchtfoto vertekent. Die kun je niet gebuiken om de vorm aan te passen. 
De BAG ziet het als één gebouw met twee adressen.
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit het beste doorgeven aan het Kadaster. Dat kan middels een terugmelding via deze site
Doe je het zelf?
Kennelijk heeft het Kadaster evt wijziging nog niet verwerkt.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=oude%20deventerweg%203&resultOffset=0&objectId=0262100000008724&geometry.x=221023.45359945&geometry.y=469838.25075057&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0262010000006594
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-25 18:20:30+00:00): De duplikaat adressen heb ik wel even  verwijderd. Dat hoort niet conform regels binnen OSM. Er zijn immers adresnodes. 
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Woazboat (2021-05-23 00:03:50+00:00): Servus, 

so ein alleinstehender/schwebender name=* Tag sollte bitte nicht für 'virtuelle' Punkte ohne dazugehöriges Objekt verwendet werden. Für Namen die einen Ort benennen aber nicht direkt einem Objekt zugeordnet werden können kann in manchen Fällen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality verwendet werden. Das finde ich hier aber auch nicht wirklich passend da dies vermutlich kein (lokal) bekannter und von Ansässigen regelmäßig so genannter Punkt ist sondern nur eine Beschreibung einer geographischen Eigenschaft die auch einfach aus der Geometrie berechnet werden kann. Ich würde den name Tag hier deswegen entfernen.

lg
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:56:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
DUGA (2021-07-25 21:06:07+00:00): Is there any better way to handle that Reddy Branch Stream Valley Unit 1?

It makes the entire area a huge mess here.
ElliottPlack (2021-07-26 02:05:18+00:00): Probably can merge them all into one area. I imported that data almost ten years ago. I bet MNCPPC has a better naming system now.
ElliottPlack (2021-07-26 02:32:05+00:00): https://mcatlas.org/parks/?find=P42&extent=-8583510.4524%2C4740197.8213%2C-8568624.3411%2C4753946.9318%2C102100
ElliottPlack (2021-07-26 21:34:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108646867#map=14/39.1834/-77.0549

I've performed the merge. Lots of the residential and school areas now overlap the park, because I got the latest park boundaries in the process. Those should be corrected, e.g. move residential area so it doesn't overlap the park. Consider the park boundaries authoritative straight from MNCPPC
Cascafico (2021-01-26 09:42:39+00:00): Nel documento http://www.cvne.it/allegati_vari/circuito_enemonzo_rev2013.pdf
 la larghezza runway dichiarata è 40 metri. Non sapendo se è possibile utilizzare queste informazioni, direi di attenerci al valore misurabile sulle dalle foto aeree, cioè 22 metri... in ogni caso stima più prudente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98136519
Fypsi (2021-01-25 17:40:17+00:00): Are you kidding us? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98136681
martinst (2021-07-03 06:30:31+00:00): Hallo, wieso hast Du sämtliche Tags von Weg 871672724 entfernt?
Und wieso beim relativ flachen Weg 871672723 sac_scale=demanding_alpine_hiking gesetzt?
user_6584176 (2021-01-25 18:12:48+00:00): This area is a de facto part of China and should follow China naming conventions, English language should not be in the name tag.
Add on name:en=*
kapazao (2021-01-25 21:33:16+00:00): Hola, es mejor que dejes una nota en https://www.openstreetmap.org activando la capa de notas. Así no se va a ver y es incorrecto añadir un nodo para esto.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98136859
fjavier_gr (2021-01-25 21:52:16+00:00): En la Wiki, y desde siempre, se ha usado esa etiqueta para indicar que hay algo que arreglar en la zona. Puedes verlo aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:fixme
Si a lo que te refieres es a ponerlo en la vía, en lugar de fuera de ella, lo hago así, porque a veces se eliminan nodos al cambiar la forma y puede pasar desaparecido.
kapazao (2021-01-25 22:19:49+00:00): Fixme se usa para decir que un elemento necesita corrección. En este caso esa nota no tiene sentido para ese nodo en concreto.
Lo que quieres poner es más una nota que una etiqueta fixme.
Si es algo que falta siempre indícalo con una nota porque así no está bien y ya te digo que no lo va a ver casi nadie.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Notas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98136859
fjavier_gr (2021-01-25 23:51:14+00:00): Ok, se puede poner:

note=fixme
fixme= lo que sea.

Así incluye las dos etiquetas.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:41:40+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
VictorIE (2022-01-23 05:34:03+00:00): Hi,

Is this a duplicate of the adjacent road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899965276#map=16/53.3204/-9.0146&layers=N
danieldegroot2 (2025-10-30 10:16:11+00:00): Hey Victor,

Though this changeset is 4 years old, based on Mapillary (and the similar usernames), this path is a duplicate of the road.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899965275
seems to be incomplete to the north and part of that end has a separate service road running along it.

Both should be checked if tags can be merged / they are tagged correctly as well.
ie. I don't think informal applies. (they likely just meant 'rural path')

I didn't check any other edits.

Regards,

Daniel
marczoutendijk (2021-01-26 10:13:06+00:00): DWG revert by:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98160572

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-26 08:24:02+00:00): Ciao e benventuo su OSM. Su OSM i nomi delle strade si inseriscono sempre con la prima lettera maiuscola. Quindi "Via..." e non "via". Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-26 08:25:21+00:00): Inoltre, non usare le immagini satellitari di Bing perché non sono ben allineate. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-26 08:28:13+00:00): Ciao. Se il negozio non c'è più, devi cancellare anche i tag shop=hairdresser e phone=... Non basta cancellare il tag name. Lascia però i tag addr:* (il numero civico esiste sempre). Ciao, Andrea
eggie (2021-01-25 18:00:57+00:00): Dag Comitaus,
Netjes gedaan..
Moet het geen highway=path zijn?
Een track is bv bedoeld voor vierwielvoertuigen of een dubbelspoor bij MTB.
Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Mountain_biking

MVG
eggie
abakus_uploader (2021-01-25 23:32:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2021-01-25 18:24:51+00:00): Beste Comitatus.
Dit is echt niet correct. De naam van een MTB route hoort op de raltie van de route. Het is niet de straatnaam.
Heb je een reden om niet te reageren?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-25 18:29:03+00:00): Tracktype grade 1 is beton of asphalt  Klopt dat wel hier?
Is het wel een track   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track?uselang=nl

highway=path 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath

MVG
eggie
Comitatus (2021-01-25 19:05:36+00:00): Uh nee het is een mtb-track dus onverhard bospad.
eggie (2021-01-25 19:10:10+00:00): Oke  Dit zijn je laatste edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98137307

tracktype=grade1 dus verwijderen
en van highwat=track maak je highway=path
Dan de naam verwijderen. Die hoort op een routerelatie. Die kun je later toevoegen.
Zie ook de info die je hebt gekregen hoe mtb paden te mappen.
surface=ground is uiteraard goed. 
Ga je zelf aan de slag?
MVG
eggie
Comitatus (2021-01-25 19:17:10+00:00): Ik ga het zelf proberen te fixen. Dat is uiteindelijk beste leer methode, wil namelijk in toekomst meer mtb routes toevoegen gezien ik daar de gpx vaak wel van heb, zo dat de kaart up2date blijft.
eggie (2021-01-25 19:20:39+00:00): Oke.. up to you..

Het beste kun je overschakelen naar editor JOSM
Dan kun je ook routerelaties bewerken zonder dat de editor (iD)  de fout in gaat.
Route relaties inleggen met iD gaat wel, maar zodra je iets gaat veranderen is de route al weer stuk. 
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 Mocht je hulp nodig hebben laat maar weten.
MVG
eggue
Comitatus (2021-01-25 19:25:14+00:00): Oh, zie je reactie nu pas. Als goed is heb ik het al veranderd. Maar de JOSM krijg ik een error op.
eggie (2021-01-25 19:31:07+00:00): Misschien 'moet' je eerst even JAVA installeren?
bxl-forever (2021-01-26 09:55:19+00:00): I fixed your vending machines.
Do not fill name text boxes for such objects.  If you want to tell what the device is about, fill the description text instead.
But amenity=vending_machine + vending=parcel_pickup is normally self-explaining for apps using the data.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-26 08:32:33+00:00): Ciao. Attenzione che hai inserito una strada con una parte in comune con il landuse (highway=unclassified
+ name=Strada del moglietto) che era già presente ed ora risulta duplicata (highway=track+ ..). Moglietto in maiuscolo. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-26 08:33:19+00:00): Ciao. Hai un inserito un nodo, ma non hai specificato nessun tag. Ciao, Andrea
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Supaplex (2021-01-26 02:58:20+00:00): 不好意思，你重覆畫了路徑，覆蓋到既有的人行道。如果有缺漏路徑再補上去即可，或是補上單車通行的標籤。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98137968
Supaplex (2021-01-26 03:00:24+00:00): 另外 OpenStreetMap 是公共的資料庫，不是拿來畫私人通勤路線。如果要自己用的，請用諸如 Google My Maps 或是 uMap 之類的產品
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98137968
opctpe (2021-01-26 03:05:45+00:00): 不好意思，因為在分享安全的通勤路線，還不熟編輯界面
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
zuicz (2021-01-26 09:08:39+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś ten obszar? Planujesz go dodać znowu?