piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner-repair (2018-02-05 11:06:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56081583 where the changeset comment is: Revert deletions by beate11111 because no proper reason was given.
Nakaner-repair (2018-02-05 11:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56081583 where the changeset comment is: Revert deletions by beate11111 because no proper reason was given.
user_5359 (2018-02-05 05:30:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short Hint: Booth relation aren't necessary (Only one member).
user_5359 (2018-02-05 06:22:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
Glassman (2018-02-05 03:50:25+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56071190
Glassman (2018-02-05 03:50:38+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56071288
BCNorwich (2018-02-05 07:20:30+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I have amended the tags, removed advertising and re-positioned your POI.
Glassman (2018-02-05 03:50:49+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56071355
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-06 01:20:22+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56071485
Nakaner-repair (2018-02-12 08:47:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56286122 where the changeset comment is: Revert Pokßémon Go vandalism. Park was drawn with less care and the user is a sockpuppet.
freebeer (2018-02-08 02:57:03+00:00): This does not look like a Park, but the grass lawn of an apartment complex with perhaps a playground in the centre.
It looks very much like Vanderlismus to me.
I have not found any search results for `Sidlung Ruhrfeld Park', verrrry strange
DD1GJ (2018-02-08 07:26:29+00:00): Reverted. This account is a sock puppet for https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Daniǝl Gott Wettǝr/history , who has already been noticed by vandalism.
user_5359 (2018-02-05 05:25:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building / shop nodes, not of the highway or property.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-02-10 15:28:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56242953 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some priapic doodles near Ashford
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-02-10 15:28:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56242953 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some priapic doodles near Ashford
HubMiner (2019-09-22 06:19:39+00:00): Greetings! Would you mind checking the hours for the park, looks unusual:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546264816

Thanks!
midnightcomm (2019-09-22 13:59:16+00:00): Sure, it looks like 06:00-22:00 is the actual times open. I'll have to wait until by a real computer, unless someone beats me to it.

Good catch
HubMiner (2019-09-22 19:27:45+00:00): Thanks! I'll take care of it.

BTW, OsmAnd does decent job for simple text edits, assuming you have that state installed...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-02-10 15:28:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56242953 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some priapic doodles near Ashford
ramrom (2019-02-28 01:53:23+00:00): "Hi DiahW,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 558667100 way 558667099 classified as 'Track'. However, going by the aerial imagery none of the imagery is supporting to give connectivity.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
sujatha_1 (2019-03-07 07:29:25+00:00): "Hi ikopanjirukmana,


Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 558678322 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residencial'.
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
ikopanjirukmana (2019-03-11 05:07:05+00:00): Hi sujatha_1,
sorry for late respon. I agree with you, those ways are residential. i only change the geometry of those roads
Carlos Brys (2018-02-13 12:45:16+00:00): Estimado  Victorloco
Gracias por tus aportes al mapa de OSM.
Lametablemente muchas de tus ediciones estaban mal etiquetadas o eran inconssistentes, por lo cual tuve que eliminarlas o corregirlas.
No se deben colocar nombres propios en las ediciones, y sería deseable que explicaras mejor la edición en lugar de escribir un cimple "me gusta".
sujatha_1 (2019-03-07 06:28:36+00:00): """Hi adiatmad,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 188009952 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'path'.
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."""
sujatha_1 (2019-03-07 07:25:40+00:00): "Hi adiatmad,


Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 159913561 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'path'.
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
adiatmad (2019-03-08 04:19:39+00:00): Hi sujatha_1

I agree with you, those ways are residential. I think local mapper should know better, but happy mapping on OSM!

Thanks.
zzptichka (2018-02-05 19:37:50+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56073682
ravalim (2019-07-05 06:16:59+00:00): Hi Yeni Primasari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Yogyakarta, I have come across the way 368571167 , way 368571166 , way 368571165 , way 509754313 , way 368571173 , way 368571172 , way 368571171 , way 368571170 , way 552021842 , way 368571169 and way 204541190 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential' 

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.
Yeni Primasari (2019-07-08 03:07:07+00:00): Hi ravalim,

I agree with you the ways classified as 'residential'. Thank you for correcting the data.
user_5359 (2018-02-05 06:26:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Hernan (2018-02-05 11:12:14+00:00): El nodo que modificaste no es el de la plaza, sino el de la población entera. La plaza ya se encontraba marcada. Para aprender sobre OSM y como editarlo, por favor lee en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-06 01:17:41+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56074428
freebeer (2018-02-06 01:50:23+00:00): Not quite, Paul.
Georg removed the coloured road lettering, but it wasn't a complete revert -- the parking lake remained intact to be scribbled on again, and the removed parking aisles (lake isles?)  weren't restored.
That Guy then built on that a second time, but I suspect the DWG may get involved with a full revert of all three changesets.
Maybe I should, instead of sleeping Real Soon Now
freebeer (2018-02-06 01:52:03+00:00): Sorry, nevermind, I should read everything first
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-06 02:11:56+00:00): It happens, but yeah, this guy's DWG fodder if he keeps it up.
freebeer (2018-02-06 02:22:56+00:00): I see, you added the aisles anew as v1 by hand.
I was worried I was imagining things, or that the summary below can be easily fooled, as apparently object histories can be fooled in this web interface by a Vespucci user.
Sorry...
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-06 14:46:22+00:00): No problem.  It was faster and easier to quickly redraw than work out a series of conflict resolution on a revert to restore those lines.
ioanam_telenav (2018-05-22 13:16:36+00:00): I've noticed that you have changed the access of the roads only on one side. Aren't they both with access=yes? Also, does the bridge has its own name? Isn't it called "South 1st Street"?
user_5359 (2018-02-05 06:32:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
user_5359 (2018-02-05 11:27:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 . Please read also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
user_5359 (2018-02-05 06:38:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
punya_man (2019-02-28 03:19:00+00:00): "Hi adiatmad,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 511618252 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to a residential area and also we can see that there is a connectivity as well.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-02-28 03:29:12+00:00): Helloo

Your characteristic are correct but I suggest to keep it as unclassified due to tagging manual in Indonesia. Please kindly check it again on wiki.
Happy mapping on OSM!

Thanks.
freebeer (2018-02-05 09:14:05+00:00): Hallo that,
Note that what you are doing is considered vandalism.
OpenStreetMap is a serious project that sees wide usage, probably by the very agency whose car park you've chosen to desecrate.  As such, with thousands or millions of data consumers relying on OSM to deliver factual and accurate data, you risk being banned from the project for this behaviour.
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-06 01:15:01+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56075455
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-06 01:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56102135 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obscene changeset.
user_5359 (2018-02-05 11:21:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you for first entry. I must correct some keys and values (please verify the entries).
Please read  also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
user_5359 (2018-02-05 10:49:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards.
snigdhap (2019-02-27 05:57:45+00:00): "Hi  Riyadi Wibowo,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 500296601
way 500296600 classified as 'Secondary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Industrial'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
Riyadi IRM-RV (2019-03-11 07:42:40+00:00): hi snigdhap. thank you for information, it's should be mistake. i change in to residential roads, its more reasonable.because its connecting into several house
Constable (2018-02-05 17:25:30+00:00): same here, this is already mapped as a church https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498096405 , you only had to add the name:ru tag with the russian translation.
Alecs01 (2018-02-05 20:04:15+00:00): Hi, is this a private home or anything else?
user_5359 (2018-02-05 11:13:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to booth nodes.
user_5359 (2018-02-05 11:13:58+00:00): If you need help: You are welcome!
user_5359 (2018-02-05 10:44:26+00:00): Hello, it isn't necessary to add an area, if this a member of a multipolygon relation.
JesseFTW (2018-02-11 07:19:28+00:00): Ah, thanks -- this was my first multipolygon, so I wasn't sure what did and didn't need to be done.
tux67 (2018-02-05 09:20:56+00:00): Hallo Eukoba,

_beide_ POIs haben bereits existiert. Die zusätzlichen Informationen habe ich den bestehenden POIs hinzugefügt und die doppleten POIs wieder entfernt. Bitte in Zukunft bestehende POIs erweitern und nicht Neue anlegen. Wenn Fragen dazu sind, bitte hier im Änderungssatzkommentar antworten.

Gruß
Stephan (tux67)
user_5359 (2018-02-05 10:40:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! It is not yet discussed in OSM whether opening_hours defines the accessibility by telephone or the office hours (on site), but if a change is desired, a look at the documentation is recommended: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours.
Independently of that, thank you for adding and maintaining(!) the entry.
bhavani1 (2019-03-07 03:52:09+00:00): "Hi Armasari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 484477221 classified as 'Track'. However, going by the aerial imagery it seems residential.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
user_5359 (2018-02-05 11:12:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed (wrong building ). Please found your corrected entry https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5389558576
user_6110846 (2018-02-05 08:53:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Креслення_під_рендер  При створенні полігоні в  У вас порушення Ландух резидентіал треба обмальовувати власне де забудова   якшо як у с. Нескучне іде хата а за нею довгий лан поля то лан поля то вже ландуз огороди/грядки landuse=alotments Якщо у селі хати на далекій відстані одне від одного то оті дерева треба вирізнити natural=wood якшо то сад то landuse=orchard   Я не місцину але маю сумнів , що за роки давності фото усе було забудовано .    Не позначайте там де лан поля хати    Дотримуйтесь правила про рендер
下り専門 (2018-02-05 11:00:30+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56077140
下り専門 (2018-02-05 11:01:18+00:00): はじめまして。OpenStreetMapへようこそ。レビュー希望が付いていましたので見ました。このエリアのBing衛星写真は低品質なためトレースの際にGPSログに合わせてずらす必要があります。 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nyampire/diary/36310 地理院の「電子国土基本図（オルソ画像）」が正確で位置合わせ不要なのでお勧めします。編集時に右メニューの背景画像設定から「Japan GSI ortho Imagery」を選びます。
user_5359 (2018-02-05 11:01:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
punya_man (2019-02-28 04:30:02+00:00): "Hi armasari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 447137926 classified as 'primary' which is ending on teritiary as it is incorrect as high priority will never end on low prioitiy.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
Constable (2018-02-05 13:51:58+00:00): I think you should have merged those two hospitals as having it mapped as a area does help understanding which buildings are part of the hospital. I'm going to fix it up then.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1290069
nikhil5 (2019-03-01 05:06:49+00:00): "Hi armasari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 558720219 classified as 'Unclassified'.However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,the area seems to be residential and this should be marked as residential road.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:52:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
Jose Luis Infante (2018-02-05 20:03:52+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56077820
Jose Luis Infante (2018-02-05 20:04:01+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56077992
simon04 (2018-03-14 17:00:05+00:00): Die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7982560 hat ohne `via`-Knoten keinen Sinn.

Warum wurde https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31774332 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2589452 eingefügt. Bitte aufpassen: die public_transport-Relationen sind eine heikle Angelegenheit; es wurde exakt definiert, welche Elemente in die Relation gehören und welche nicht, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
Владимир К (2018-02-06 06:42:10+00:00): дубль уже существующего?
sergeybe (2018-02-07 03:41:30+00:00): Похоже этого пользователя надо банить. Не понимает человек ничего.
Владимир К (2018-02-07 06:20:38+00:00): а по-моему просто не до конца разобрался. Но если считаете нужным, напишите в DWG
sergeybe (2018-02-07 06:29:01+00:00): Я ему популярно объяснил почему гору нужно оставить название Козырек, а он опять изменил. По моему он не хочет вникать ни в топонимику Крыма, ни в в то как данные править в OSM, а перешел к вандализму и выдумыванию названий.
eggie (2018-04-10 19:27:39+00:00): De info heb ik naar de BAG adresnode verplaatst. 
Merged info with official addressnode.. please don't add addresses. 
Greetz, Eggie
geri-oc (2018-02-08 07:28:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32892458 
name="Laibischbach (Verlauf annähernd wegen Wald)" ist kein name=* 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
Das kann in description:de=* - da kann es jeder lesen, der den Bach als Daten lädt. Als Hinweis für Mapper gibt es noch note=*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description
eggie (2018-02-05 10:07:48+00:00): Hi Wilsberg.. Dieser track war völlig verklebt mit dem Parallelrack der Buitenring entlang. Ich habe den Duplicate entfernt. Vielleicht können Sie es nochmals nachsehen. 
War die alte Situation vielleicht doch recht mit der Kurve?
wilsberg (2018-02-05 10:29:29+00:00): hallo eggie,
danke für die Korrektur (habe da noch keine Erfahrung).
Ich bin über die neue (alte) Gaiabrücke über den Buitenring mit dem Fahrrad gefahren und habe einen gegenüber der eingezeichneten Brücke unterscheidlichen Track erhalten. Von daher wollte ich die Brücke und die Zuwegung entsprechend ändern.
Ich hoffe das ist der korrekte Link zum Track:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wilsberg/traces/2587049
Gruß
Norbert
eggie (2018-02-05 11:27:13+00:00): Oke Norbert... Ich habe  jetzt deinen Tracklog benutzt. Das muss gerade klappen . :)
Renderung dauert eine Weile
Grüss aus Holland
Eggie
nikhil5 (2019-03-01 03:44:08+00:00): "Hi  DiahW,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437490374 classified as 'Residential'.However, going by the aerial imagery,none of the imagery is supporting to give connectivity.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
Rachowice88 (2018-02-05 09:06:25+00:00): Zatem proponuje landuse recreation grounds. Chyba najlepiej opisze to miejsce

Pozdrawiam
ts_kanth (2019-03-06 13:53:11+00:00): Hi Anisa berliana

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 500551937 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
anisa berliana (2019-03-13 03:12:54+00:00): @ts_kanth 500551939, v2 i agree this way is residential but 500551937, v2 this way is unclassified. thanks for reviewing.
Alexander-II (2018-03-27 14:17:29+00:00): В результате всех ваших метаний: 56051946, 56052115, 56052185, 56079102 — у объекта https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6210577 появилось два тега:  
- note=выявленный объект культурного наследия https://data.mos.ru/opendata/530/row/2959975  
- old_name=Ресторан «Альпийская роза»

Это верная информация? Они все еще нужны на этом отношении?
Vadiм (2018-03-27 15:47:15+00:00): Всё верно. Может подскажете как описать с помощью heritage? Добавлю wikidata.
BCNorwich (2018-02-05 18:45:00+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your addition of a node only did not contribute any meaningful data to OSM. I have taken the liberty to draw the building and add descriptive tags from the website. I hope that's OK, if anything needs altering please go ahead or ask via these comments for help.
Regards Bernard.
PS If you want to add more features to the map and need help please just ask.
ChehrehBargi (2019-05-23 08:08:39+00:00): بعضی از راه های فرعی، دو کوچه دارای نام را به هم متصل می کنند و نامی ندارند. این مسیر نیز متصل کننده بوده و اسم فلسطین مربوط به خیابان متصل شونده به میدان باکری می باشد.
دقت بفرمایید
kiaraSh-Q (2019-05-23 09:28:39+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز و خسته نباشید
چنجست من مربوط به مواردی که شما ذکر کردین نبوده و شما روی چنجست اشتباهی کامنت گذاشتین، لطفاً بیشتر دقت بفرمایید و اول بررسی بکنین که تغیررات مربوط به چه چنجستی هست هست و بعد روی همون چنجست کامنت بذارین.
ممنون از اینکه ژرف می اندیشید و توجه میفرمایید.