piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
karson_ (2021-09-03 17:28:47+00:00): It is very clear that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979190256 is not a bridge. Just a culvert. If using iD, Esri Clarity is usually the best imagery for rural US.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110668603
pasrijon (2021-10-26 12:00:20+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing the feedback.
Apologies for tagging the small portion as bridge=yes, I have made the necessary corrections in the changeset #112990621.
I'll ensure to not repeat such errors going ahead.
Thanks once again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
pasrijon
s8evq (2021-09-07 07:08:02+00:00): Klopt inderdaad, ik had het verkeerd gezien.
syntex (2021-09-04 14:21:40+00:00): Na ten moment nie są to żadne osiedla. Nazwy są błędne
eggie (2021-09-06 21:31:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip.. In OSM Nederland zetten we niet nogmaals het adres op de gebouwomtrek. Er zijn al adresnodes.
Dat is voldoende. De naam Mercator  I  staat nu 2x op de kaart.
Het adres zal ik verwijderen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
philippec (2021-09-03 13:45:37+00:00): Hasselt tankstation Bruno.  Kunt u de foto tonen in Osmand ?  En ik bedoel niet de foto in de buurt die toevallig de goede zou zijn.
dentonny (2021-09-03 15:17:53+00:00): Hallo,
Als je de mapillary bedoelt die ik getagged heb, die zie ik niet in osmand. Als dat uw redenatie is om de volledige URL te gebruiken ipv enkel de key dan lijkt mij dit eerder een issue dat osmand moet oplossen.
Ik voeg regelmatig de tags contact:facebook of contact:Instagram ook toe van zaken, en ook enkel het laatste stuk, niet de volledige URL. En dat werkt wel perfect in osmand, dus het moet voor hun niet moeilijk zijn om hun app te updaten.

Je kan eventueel via het AED thema in mapcomplete zelf een foto toevoegen. Dan wordt deze op imgur gepost en wordt de image tag gebruikt, dit wordt wel door osmand getoond.

Mvg
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:51:22+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:51:32+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках.

С уважением,
Энди
Hanan Tikveša (2021-09-03 10:55:10+00:00): Please create EACH changeset for EACH place.
this changeset edits 2 nodes.
it would be much more efficient if you created 2 changesets for 2 nodes.
blankmash (2021-09-03 11:02:22+00:00): This won't be more efficient, just more readable. And it depends both nodes are for the same company... so it makes more sense for them to be in the same changeset
maraf24 (2021-09-03 11:28:55+00:00): Do wycofania.
maraf24 (2021-09-03 11:26:12+00:00): Nie wygląda to na most.
maraf24 (2021-09-03 11:25:01+00:00): Skąd wiesz, że tu jest most?
Wygląda na przepust lub bród.
Исраилжан (2021-09-03 11:06:58+00:00): Прошу прощения под городом Талдыкорган
StefanHRT (2021-09-03 14:29:00+00:00): Hallo,
Das ist mir in letzter Zeit auch bei Komoot aufgefallen, das man immer öfter über solche Wege geroutet wird. Sofern noch nicht vorhanden ändere ich die Wege auf drive-through und Access customers ;)
4004 (2021-09-05 23:49:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47205515 service?
Prusaker (2021-09-06 05:45:43+00:00): Вроде же это заезд во дворы, и выглядит как заезд во дворы.
ivanbranco (2021-09-12 06:48:30+00:00): Hi Kristian,

vej=forward was supposed to be direction=forward?
danieldegroot2 (2021-09-03 19:54:04+00:00): Hey sab27,

"retagged two features mapped as building as natural=shrub"
Do not do this, please. If you are absolutely certain these objects were interpreted incorrectly -as buildings in this case-, correct their tagging where appropriate, but in the case of 'buildings' you should simply remove them.
Re-tagging/using objects as something completely different may be considered bad practice or even vandalism.

See a.o. the "Don't mix the history" section of the "Good practice" page on the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history#Don.27t_mix_the_history
^ Also, the above section on checking the history/source for which imagery was used

Sidenote: It seems both objects were mapped by the same user and are the only objects mapped in the changeset. You can check the changeset for more objects which may be wrong if there were any, but *more importantly* can send the user feedback or mention them on the HOT project's discussion section \ alert managers if any other changesets also do this.

Regards,

Daniel
sab27 (2021-09-03 21:49:42+00:00): Hi Daniel, 
thanks for the feedback, and I will definitely stop such retagging - I didn't realise it would be problematic and could even be seen as vandalism!! I adopted this practice when (at a time when I was a relatively new validator) I was told by a senior global validator that basically I should not delete anything, and in the case of phantom highways (where someone mistook say a field boundary for a path or track) should retag them as barrier=hedge rather than deleting them... So, I also applied this approach to phantom buildings... 

Interesting to read in the wiki that history should only be retained if the object is at the same location, because I was also told that outdated buildings should be "recycled" i.e. if they no longer exist, they should be dragged to wherever a newer building has to be added. And, if too many buildings are "left over", to combine them and then use the replace geometry tool! It never made sense to me, but I eventually gave up arguing against this and now participate in telling new mappers to recycle buildings... 🤦‍♀️ So, thanks for clarifying this and pointing me to the wiki page!

Regards
Sabine
ottwiz (2021-09-03 12:13:23+00:00): + for waterway I used the USGS topo maps to determine its route
george1201 (2023-05-20 21:21:54+00:00): Hallo wuff57,
du hast im Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9060137465 ein Wegkreuz neu eingetragen. Dazu gibt es jetzt den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3643643. Das Kreuz ist aber offenbar schon seit 12 Jahren in der Karte vorhanden. Nur nicht ganz an der richtigen Stelle. Am besten fände ich, wenn du deinen Knoten wieder löschen würdest und den anderen Knoten (mit der längeren History) an die richtige Stelle verschieben würdest. Oder was meinst du?
wuff57 (2023-05-21 08:18:24+00:00): Hallo george1201, vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Es sieht tatsächlich so aus, als hätte ich das bestehende Feldkreuz auf der Karte übersehen. Ich habe meinen Knoten gelöscht und den bestehenden entsprechend verschoben. Viele Grüße, Franz-Peter
aceman444 (2021-12-18 21:12:13+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za doplnenie, ze tu odbocku zase otvorili (zrejme pri prerabke zastavok).
Takato pasaz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979312064 nie je v OSM tunel, ale covered=collonade. A uz vobec nie layer=-1. Ked je to tunel (ako ta cesta 464435751 severne), tak tunnel=building_passage, ale stale bez layer=-1. Pozrite wiki. Dakujem.
Illio (2021-12-19 19:17:06+00:00): Vďaka za opravu.
Raf_de (2021-09-05 15:57:17+00:00): Hello wajde12,
I've noticed you have been drawing highways and steps that have been floating, or not connecting to any ways. You've also drawn some highways where we can't really see any evidence of their existence. Here are some examples of this,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979318511/history#map=19/31.86534/10.98328
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979404460/history#map=19/31.86534/10.98280 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979318349/history#map=19/31.86712/10.98708
I wanted to bring this to your attention so you can be more careful in your future editing so that the data on OSM can continue being as accurate as possible!
Happy mapping!
-Raf_De
Firefishy (2021-09-03 13:43:28+00:00): Ačiū!
Pink Duck (2021-09-03 13:14:39+00:00): Please avoid adding addr:postcode to the school area when there's a building=school present with it already.
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-03 13:40:46+00:00): The postcode had actually previously been added by someone else here.
I agree that it seems like duplication having tags on the building as well as the site outline, but I'm not convinced that it's wrong for the school's postcode to be added to the school outline
Pink Duck (2021-09-03 13:47:22+00:00): There's another tag postal_code that could be used, but addr:postcode is building-specific per UK Royal Mail deliverable addressing.
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-03 17:34:34+00:00): Hmm, I feel that postal_code is only for highways so I wouldn't like adding that.
Feel free to remove addr:postcode here
osmviborg (2021-09-03 13:12:16+00:00): Mange af disse vandhuller burde tagges 'intermittent=yes'. Dette her er bar mark på 2021 ortofoto.
osmviborg (2021-09-03 13:13:50+00:00): Også bar mark i 2018.
aupdk (2021-09-03 13:37:04+00:00): God observation, tak. jeg går dem lige over og sætter tagget. God weekend.
Zalitoar (2021-10-04 00:45:29+00:00): Gracias por agregar datos a OpenStreetMap Andrea celeste Romero Romero. Sugiero realizar algunas correcciones para que los mismos se ajusten a las convenciones de mapeo adoptadas por la comunidad OSM local. 

Por ejemplo, los nombres no deben estar en mayúsculas, se deben evitar las abreviaciones poniendo las palabras completas (en vez de "C 53" corresponde "Calle 53").

También, tomando como referencia los nombres de comercios y otros puntos de interés, parecen no coincidir algunas etiquetas con las que deberían ir: el caso de "POLLERIA Y VERDULERIA" está mapeado como shop=kiosk cuando debería ser shop=greengrocer para verdulerías o shop=butcher para carnicerías sumando butcher=poultry para el caso particular de carne aviar.

Podés consultar las convenciones locales de mapeo en el artículo "Reglas de mapeo" de nuestra Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina/Etiquetas 
o bien contactar a la comunidad para realizar todas las consultas que sean necesarias. Podés encontrarnos en Telegram, e-mail y otras redes sociales:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
Zalitoar (2021-10-04 00:55:35+00:00): En este conjunto de cambios corregí los nombres de varias calles y avenidas, puede servir de ejemplo para las demás correcciones que faltan:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112052697
edvac (2021-10-04 15:47:18+00:00): Hola, Andrea celeste Romero Romero:

Hemos recibido en el Data Working Group de la Fundación OpenStreetMap una queja formal sobre un gran número de conjuntos de cambios que estáis llevando a cabo, alrededor de 10 usuarios (incluyéndote a ti), en distintas zonas de la localidad de San Fernando del Valle de Catamarca, Argentina.

La queja es múltiple:

1. Uso de "addr:inclusion" en lugar de "addr:interpolation"
2. Uso incorrecto de "addr:interpolation=odd" en todas las vías, incluso en aquellas con numeración par
3. Algunos nodos cambian su addr:housenumber tres o más veces en el proceso.
4. Creación de duplicados de addr:housenumber

Asimismo, en general, el comentario que ponéis sistemáticamente ("minidigital") no es nada informativo de lo que estáis haciendo. Por favor, explicad brevemente qué es lo que hacéis en cada conjunto de cambios. En esta página wiki [1] se explica bien qué consideramos un buen y un mal comentario en un conjunto de cambios, y porqué es importante dejar buenos comentarios.

Por otro lado, y visto que estos 10 usuarios ponéis sistemáticamente el mismo comentario - "minidigital" - nos hace sospechar que ésta es una actividad de mapeo organizada. En ese caso: ¿habéis consultado las Directrices de Edición Organizada [2] y registrado la actividad en la correspondiente página wiki [3]?

Por último, en vuestros conjuntos de cambios no estáis dejando constancia de la fuente de datos que estáis utilizando para añadir direcciones a los diferentes edificios y cuadras de esta localidad. ¿Cuál es la fuente de datos que estáis usando?

Por favor, contestad a todas estas interrogantes y cualesquiera otras que se os envíen por parte de cualquier usuario, o nos veremos en la necesidad de pausar temporalmente esta actividad de mapeo hasta asegurarnos de que no se dañan los datos presentes en el mapa.

Un cordial saludo,

Rafael Avila Coya, en nombre de la OpenStreetMap Foundation, Data Working Group.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities

DWG Ticket#2021092310000089
j numminen (2021-09-03 13:29:47+00:00): Dear Joni, this changeset is too large as it covers large areas in Norway, Sweden and Finland. (I'm referring to the orange box that you see when you open this page: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110678398 ). Please edit a small area at a time. This might mean uploading a single node, if your next edit will be hundreds of kilometers away.

So, please finalize and upload your changes before moving far away. It will make the “History” panel easier to understand for all mappers who are monitoring their local areas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F#Large_changesets

Best regards, j
Joni Helminen (2021-09-03 14:14:32+00:00): Thank you, ill do that!
oh8mxl (2021-09-03 20:41:56+00:00): Joni, welcome to the team! Don't worry, we all need to learn things. I see you have a great attitude!
So, small things to learn: Please go to the changeset page mentioned in  j numminen's comment. Click on the following nodes: 9060275557 and 9060275559. You will see that they are just empty points, not connected to anything or have any tags. To see that -5559 node is not connected to the way you might need to open your Vespucci editor. Guess it's easy to create those inadvertly with a new editor. So, you can try if you are able to remove those empty nodes with your editor.  These are very small detail but good to learn to avoid when editing.
danieldegroot2 (2021-09-03 18:26:16+00:00): *and removed demolished building (actively removed).
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-09-05 21:02:31+00:00): شكرا جزيلاً لك ومرحبا بك في خريطة الشارع المفتوحة
PeterPan99 (2021-09-06 18:57:12+00:00): I visited here today and it is a "Tesco Express", not a full supermarket.  I hope that @Robert Whittaker will not object to my re-tagging it as such.
PeterPan99 (2021-09-06 19:02:54+00:00): I have failed to re-tag it as "Tesco Express" because the iD editor objects to this and suggests changing it back to "Tesco".  I left it as is, pending further research into brands / brand tagging / wikidata etc.
Robert Whittaker (2021-09-06 19:36:00+00:00): Thanks for checking the correct name on site. Looks like you've managed to re-tag it now. iD's "helpful" tag-upgrade suggestions don't always get it right, but if you look at the full set of raw tags you should be able to fix anything you need to. Sometimes there are other fields that need changing too to get rid of the suggestion, but they might not be the ones that iD is actually suggesting changing!
PeterPan99 (2021-09-06 21:45:38+00:00): Thanks.  I think I have got it right now.  I had to change the wikidata tag first, then iD stopped objecting.  However, changing the name to the full version "Tesco Milton Keynes Old Farm Park Express" caused it to suggest changing back to "Tesco" again (without the "Express").  BTW all this started from a certain "Survey Me!" tool flagging a possible mis-match!
Futur3r (2021-09-03 14:52:44+00:00): Bonjour,

vous pouvez spécifier le 'type de point d'eau',
drinking_water c'est uniquement pour l'eau potable.

Pour les type abreuvoir c'est amenity=watering_place et si l'eau est potable, utilisez drinking_water=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110678854
Futur3r (2021-09-03 14:55:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dwatering_place
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110678854
literan (2021-09-05 19:56:24+00:00): добрый день. Не надо, пожалуйста, исправлять тег crossing=uncontrolled на crossing=marked. Второй тег для России неприменим (у нас маркируются зеброй любые переходы - и регулируемые, и нерегулируемые).
Tomas_J (2026-03-03 14:05:06+00:00): Ahoj, na tejto ceste (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289106969) vidim na ortofoto z roku 2021 chodnik. Oznacil si ju ako sidewalk=no. Opravim. Daj, prosim, pozor, dik.
StefanHRT (2021-09-04 11:01:30+00:00): Bevor es durch den Titel zu Missverständnissen kommt, der Fehler liegt woanders (wie imCS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100247132 beschrieben). Stichwort "vehicle=no"
pinbox_a (2021-09-03 13:43:35+00:00): Прошу удалить эту правку, создалась по ошибке
Lee Carré (2021-09-03 17:07:10+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please. Especially when the set includes more changes than is described in the comment.
jonatortue (2021-09-03 17:18:12+00:00): All the changes are relative to that guest house (except the library, I made a mistake and forgot to save before sorry)
highflyer74 (2022-01-26 06:35:03+00:00): Moin Xxlfussel!

Nochmal ein Tipp mit eingebauter Bitte, Deine Mappingtechnik zu ändern:

Das Verbinden von Wegen mit Flächen wird von der Community als nicht empfehlenswert betrachtet, da es die Wartung der Daten erschwert. Hinzukommt, dass Flächen auch in Wirklichkeit nicht bis zur Mittellinie des Weges reichen. Insofern verschlechterst Du mit Deiner Technik die Datenlage.

Viele Grüße!
RicoElectrico (2021-10-08 16:32:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2885757
highflyer74 (2021-09-12 18:38:34+00:00): Hallo!

Mir fiel auf, dass Du recht viele Relationen erstellst, wo eine einfache Fläche ausreichen würde. Auch verbindest Du Wege mit Flächen. Beides ist nicht optimal, da es die Bearbeitung für nachfolgende Mapper erschwert und auch technisch nicht notwendig ist. Hat es einen bestimmten Grund, dass Du auf diese Art mappst? Viele Grüße!
Xxlfussel (2021-09-25 16:18:40+00:00): Wenn man die Flächen direkt an die Straße „tagt“, dann ist es aus meiner Sicht besser, wenn man dies über Relationen löst, als über Linie auf Linie. Nämlich so brauch der nächste Mapper viel länger, wenn sich etwas geändert hat, weil man „Punkt für Punkt“ die eine Linie von der anderen Linie trennen muss. Bei der Relation-Lösung muss man einfach nur die Relation aus der Linie löschen. Es erspart also viel Arbeit.
BCNorwich (2021-09-03 17:10:09+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reinstated the deleted objects. Please amend/correct existing mapped objects rather than delete and remap. Thus all history is maintained. I added your new info to the old slipway. Has the pier actually been removed?

Regards Bernard.
BSO Luke (2021-09-06 10:26:29+00:00): Hello Bernard,

Thanks for the help! I'll make sure not to delete things in the future.

In terms of the pier; Yes, it is gone now. The park grounds used to be maintained by the broads authority but this is no longer the case. The pier was dismantled along side this.

- Luke.
BCNorwich (2021-09-06 16:17:54+00:00): Hi Luke,
Thanks for getting back with the info, I had reinstated the pier but have now removed it. Need any help please feel free to just ask.

Regards Bernard.
sheldonelectric (2023-01-09 16:31:51+00:00): Hey LeonCR, traffic lights and stop signs need no direction when they are one a one-way street. It's redundant.
SomeoneElse (2021-09-03 14:38:11+00:00): Hello,
You created https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9060428918/history in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.  I'm guessing that perhaps you did it on a phone and the website you were using didn't have access to geolocation there or something?
Whatever happened, you probably want to add this wherever it really exists.
Best Regards,
Andy
aweech (2021-09-03 18:53:27+00:00): Hi,
I think that VT 113 from US 5 to the NH border should still be tertiary. I know state routes in VT should rarely be tertiary, but I think that this is one of those cases for a few reasons. It basically just goes to the bridge, the bridge itself is pretty sketchy, on the NH side it isn't a numbered state route, and Lyme village is quite small. It's important to have coherence at the border. Is it alright if we change it back?
A Hall (2021-09-03 19:02:19+00:00): Done. No objections. It's good reasoning
A Hall (2021-09-03 19:13:09+00:00): It's actually quite amazing how big a gap NH is ok with an 18 mile gap along route 10 without accessing US 5 nor I 91.
wkdgs (2021-09-03 16:03:48+00:00): Hallo,

ich hab mir deine Änderung angeschaut, da du angegeben hast, dass es nochmal jemand prüfen soll.

Dabei ist mir der Schlüssel "description" aufgefallen. 

Zum Einen sollte der Text dort kurz gehalten werden. Möglichst nur ein paar Worte oder kurze Sätze. So wie es aussieht wurde bei dir der Text sogar mittendrin abgeschnitten.

Zum Anderen sollte der Schlüssel nicht für Werbung jeglicher Form verwendet werden, sondern für kurze zusätzliche Karteninformation, die anders nicht ausgedrückt werden können. Auch detaillierte Preisinformationen o.ä sollten eher auf eine eigene Webseite ausgelagert werden und gehören nicht in den "description"-Schlüssel.

Nachlesen kannst du das hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description

Außerdem ist mir der Schlüssel "note" aufgefallen, in dem eine zweite Telefonnummer stand. Wofür ist die gedacht? Der "note"-Schlüssel ist eigentlich dazu da anderen Mappern Informationen zu hinterlassen.

Beide Schlüssel habe ich dementsprechend entfernt. Ansonsten sieht deine Änderung aber gut aus.

LG
winkeldings
wkdgs (2021-09-03 16:05:50+00:00): Eins noch. Die doppelten Infos und die Anführungszeichen habe ich noch aus dem "name"-Schlüssel entfernt.
Bodenseeprinz (2021-09-03 16:08:02+00:00): Hallo winkeldings,

Vielen Dank für die Unterstützung. Das war mein erster Eintrag. Alle Änderungen deinerseits sehe ich als korrekt an und verstehe die Begründung. Danke dafür.
wkdgs (2021-09-03 16:19:32+00:00): Und danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.
itchybellybutton (2021-09-04 08:54:45+00:00): Ich habe abschließend noch den Namen und die Notiz vom Haus entfernt, da die Information ja im Punkt der Ferienwohnung ist.
Bodenseeprinz (2021-09-04 08:58:02+00:00): Dankeschön!
DressyPear4 (2021-09-05 22:34:48+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta, antes estava correto.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110681145
wille (2021-11-24 19:54:10+00:00): Oi, Flávio! Uma sugestão: utilize a tecla Q depois de desenhar a área do bicicletário para fazer os ângulos terem 90º.

abçs,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110681247
SomeoneElse (2021-09-03 14:34:34+00:00): You've just deleted a NOAA research buoy from the Gulf of Guinea - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3815077900/history .  Was that deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy
Hanan Tikveša (2021-09-03 16:07:46+00:00): i restored the Atlas Buoy in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110685591
SomeoneElse (2021-09-03 16:28:45+00:00): Thanks
Gonéo (2021-09-08 10:09:43+00:00): Hello,

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=7&error=152839035 signale une faute de frappe sur "tennis" Je te laisse le soin de revoir ta modif ;-)
Bonne journée
benoitdd (2021-09-08 13:20:44+00:00): c'est corrigé :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-17 06:55:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979347091/history - is it supposed to be shop=vacant?
zluuzki (2023-08-22 06:21:16+00:00): yes, I think

-sorry for the late reply
SimonPoole (2021-09-04 09:46:15+00:00): Hallo insl, du hast recht viele Ladestationen eingetragen / umbenannt. Hast aber keine Quelle für die Änderungen angeben. 

Kannst du das noch nachholen? Danke.
insl (2021-09-04 10:02:59+00:00): klaro, mache ich. Habe nicht gemerkt, dass es das gibt - ist aber sinnvoll. Meistens ist es GoogleMaps / evpass Karte für Ladestationen. Muss allerdings noch herausfinden, wo ;) (und ob ich eine Liste meinder edits machen kann auch)