piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2018-02-01 11:00:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Het gebied van je edit is zo groot omdat je de Leisure park en een landuse grass vast hebt geplakt aan de residential van Putten.
Dit zal niet de bedoeling zijn, maar geeft wel ongewenste effecten bij verschuivingen. Ik kijk even naar je edits.
Dit was je edit. 
Zo'n Leisure park hoort helemaal los te liggen.

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55961631
eggie (2018-02-01 11:02:37+00:00): Je  bedoeling zal ongetwijfeld goed zijn, maar..
zo'n grasveld bij de Hervormde gemeente zal niet goed renderen als de "ways" over elkaar heenlopen. Ook hier zit van alles aan elkaar geplakt. Ik kijk er even naar.
eggie (2018-02-01 11:08:27+00:00): Park lig los nu. je hebt verder Daverlaarsgoed 27 verplaatst naar een vijver aan de Henslare. oorzaak is het schuiven van de kaart. beter is het om in een klein begied (straat0 iets te veranderen en dan op te slaan. Dus niet te veel edits in één changeset.
Ik zal het adres terugleggen.
eggie (2018-02-01 11:14:53+00:00): De landuse grass losgemaakt van de residential van Putten en de 'zelf kruisende wegen" opgelost.
De naam Putten van de Residential gehaald. Die staat al elders op een place-node.
eggie (2018-02-01 11:17:48+00:00): Adres ligt weer terug.
eggie (2018-02-01 11:20:30+00:00): Het principe om een park zo te taggen is prima. Je kunt plakken voorkomen door goed in te zoomen. Editor iD heeft de onhebbelijke eigenschap om overal aan vast te plakken. 
Wanneer je wilt doorzetten met OSM kun je het beste overstappen naar editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Succes verder.. laat svp even weten dat je nota van de feedback hebt genomen.
eggie (2018-02-01 11:35:57+00:00): surface=Hout_snippers is geen officiële tag binnen OSM. 
In de wiki kaarteigenschappen kun je zulke zaken vinden .. zie welkomstmail.
eggie (2018-02-01 11:38:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:surface
surface = woodchips
user_242798 (2019-04-02 13:49:04+00:00): Ik begrijp hier helemaal niets van!
Veerstraat:
[traffic_sign=NL:G11]
Onderbord:
maandag 13.00-18.00 uur
di t/m zaterdag 11.00-18.00 uur
vrijdag 18.00-21.00 uur ivm koopavond
koopzondagen zie www.gooisemeren.nl
(Voor zover leesbaar op Mapillary 2019-03-30, op dit moment nog niet beschikbaar?)
https://i.postimg.cc/qMkvR4s1/190330-141731-0.jpg
Wat betekent dit: gedurende deze tijden géén fietspad, of alléén gedurende deze tijden wél fietspad?
Op OSM staat het - achtereenvolgens - als: pedestrian, cycleway, residential, cycleway, pedestian.
[access=delivery] + motor_vehicle=yes@(conditional).
Dit betekent dat bicycle NOOIT toegang heeft (tenzij: delivery). Niet tijdens op onderbord vermelde tijden en niet buiten op onderbord vermelde tijden. En dat lijkt mij (zelfs als ik het niet begrijp) onjuist.
Taksine (2023-10-05 04:43:39+00:00): That's not a barracks, that's a school!
whb (2018-02-01 15:49:45+00:00): Zurückgesetzt, da Löschungen nicht plausibel.
eggie (2018-02-01 11:30:47+00:00): Dag EfmK... De plaatsnaam ontbreekt hier nog.
DD1GJ (2018-02-01 23:59:54+00:00): Ein Park direkt am Bahnsteig? Echte Parks zu Seen verwandelt!. Die Community verzichtet gerne auf Deine "Phantasie".

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Revert 55962758 55923092 55922914 55891040 55882173 55882146, Pokémon-Vandalismus
user_6110846 (2018-02-01 11:52:19+00:00): в откат
user_6110846 (2018-02-01 11:56:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Вікіпроект_Україна/Класифікація_доріг   зверніть увагу у кінці Саме відноше нн було правильне Ви зробили не вірно
ForstEK (2019-03-14 06:28:27+00:00): Hi! You had created many points with tag man_made=tar_kiln (6924!). Do you want to describe it means in wiki proposal?
xronos (2019-03-15 22:00:33+00:00): hi!
short answer: no
for the further reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta/Luokat
houtari (2019-04-21 21:27:00+00:00): Seems to be a lot of duplicates as well. I would appreciate if you could avoid adding these duplicates in the future. It generates a lot of unnecessary work to remove them.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-17 11:01:38+00:00): Hello,
This looks like an import - can you link to where it was discussed?  The page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta/Luokat just says "There is a need for a draft of some groups and the appropriate tags if the data is imported into OSM in due course".  Can you explain what e.g. "mml:class=45000" means?  Imports do need to follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines .
Best Regards,
Andy
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-20 14:05:52+00:00): I am planning to revert this import as undiscussed and not documented and introducing tags with unclear meaning.

If it was discussed and local community wants it to stay, please link relevant discussion and post to imports mailing list required by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-20 14:08:07+00:00): Also, what is the copyright status of imported data?
xronos (2021-01-20 16:32:02+00:00): > Also, what is the copyright status of imported data?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta/Luokat
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta/Road_Import_Stage1_Workflow
xronos (2021-01-20 16:42:37+00:00): > introducing tags with unclear meaning.
	
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta/Luokat
Tervahauta man_made=tar_kiln
https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tervahauta
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tervahauta
tar kiln (dry distillation oven, historically used in Scandinavia for producing tar from wood)
	
Are you guys so lazy that you can't be bothered to use the search?
SomeoneElse (2021-01-20 17:16:54+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny Given the response above, I'd say a revert is probably overdue!
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-20 18:20:20+00:00): "require third parties to provide the same information when granting rights to copies of dataset(s) or products and services containing such data and"

in https://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/en/opendata-licence-version1 in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta/Road_Import_Stage1_Workflow

Is it something that was reviewed to be compatible with ODBL? Can you link post on imports mailing list confirming this?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-20 18:21:51+00:00): > Are you guys so lazy that you can't be bothered to use the search?

Are you familiar with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Especially with parts that require you to document this info so others are not obligated to use search?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-20 18:29:43+00:00): Also, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Fi:Maastotietokanta ( needed due to https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ )
xronos (2021-01-20 21:58:09+00:00): l don't have a law degree to judge about licensing issues. My speciality is conversing shp data to osm xml format :) Try to ask the article creators https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Kenkku
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Alv 

It would be diffucult for me to write documentation cos my english skills is quite limited. But now you are aware about lack of documentation could you please do a favor for a community and fix the issue?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-21 10:22:41+00:00): 1) if licensing issues were not solved then import must not be done

2) has anyone asked local community whatever this import is desirable? If yes - please link where it was done

3) has anyone did required posting on imports mailing list? If yes, please link it

"It would be diffucult for me to write documentation cos my english skills is quite limited" - it can be in local language, local community can be and should be asked in a local language. And review of copyright situation also seems to require Finnish 

"could you please do a favor for a community and fix the issue?" - I am unable to do this, as I am unable to speak Finnish so I would be unable to either ask local community or review copyright situation.

Also, doing this is responsibility of whoever makes import anyway.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-21 10:23:16+00:00): "l don't have a law degree to judge about licensing issues." - that is why posting to imports mailing list BEFORE making edits is required and mandatory
xronos (2021-01-21 20:02:25+00:00): > if licensing issues were not solved then import must not be done
	
	I'm sorry, I maybe mistaken, but I thought if article was published and the tags meanings were explained the case is obvious to me. Moreover, some imports (from the same source) have been done before my actions 5 years ago! In my opinion, the time has approved correctness of our actions. I'm sorry if I'm mistaken.

> review of copyright situation also seems to require Finnish
	
	If you think the actions require Finnish why do you interfere? Sounds like it will be difficult for you to read the Finnish documentation? Why do you ask links to Finnish mail lists?
	
	Did you ask users 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Kenkku
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Alv 
	User Alv participates in finish osm mail list. Ask him, please.

> Also, doing this is responsibility of whoever makes import anyway.

	I accept full responsibility of my actions. The data is correct, in public domain since 2012. The imports have been proceeding at least 5 years.

> "l don't have a law degree to judge about licensing issues." - that is why posting to imports mailing list BEFORE making edits is required and mandatory
	
	It seems to me You are vaguely understanding what happening in Finnish OSM. I'm sorry if I'm wrong. Are you a private person, a moderator or a representative of the DWG? Are you an authorized person?

	Excuse me, this discuss is pointless for me.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-21 20:06:49+00:00): I am a private person that plans to revert this import unless you (or someone else) will fix missing documentation

Are you planning to do this? I am fine with waiting if you declare that missing things will be fixed and there will be some attempt to fix it.

> Excuse me, this discuss is pointless for me.

OK, I will not respond to other parts.
houtari (2021-01-21 21:19:49+00:00): As I see it - it's OK to incorporate this CCBY data by the finnish National Land Survey (NLS for short & Maanmittauslaitos in finnish) to OSM out of the license perspective. Some discussion about the licensing can be found here... https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2580#issuecomment-614603338
houtari (2021-01-21 21:24:37+00:00): However these other requirements regarding wiki and contacting the community haven't as far as I believe been performed. This page that has been refered to (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta) is just a general info page about NLS data. The page was created after NLS released their data under the CCBY open licence. It has a reference to an active road data import (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta/Road_Import_Stage1_Plan) but that is all actual import references I can find on that page. The page also contains the following instructions in finnish "Kysy siis muiden mielipidettä ennen kuin edes harkitset tietojen tuomista maastotietokannasta!" - which instructs the user to ask the community before even considering any import.
SomeoneElse (2021-01-21 23:41:36+00:00): Re "it is OK" above, the way I read https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2580 it's not clear that everyone commenting there think that it is yet OK (from a licence standpoint).  Also it seems odd to have only a .png of an email in that thread?
HSL_HRT (2021-01-22 06:33:54+00:00): I couldn't agree more. I would prefer the available waiver templates to be filled out and used by the data providers to issue these permissions instead of phone calls being presented literally or mail correspondences being referred to with screenshots. This would save us all from a lot of unnecessary speculations.
posiki (2021-01-23 14:50:21+00:00): Import of NLSFi data is widely accepted by Finnish OSM community: please read forum and mailist lists since 2012 (or even 2011).
Discussion has been also in Import mailing list on Jan 2012 (at least): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2012-January/001210.html.
There are another imports in Finland which you can revert, if you have eager to make reverts.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-23 15:00:51+00:00): > There are another imports in Finland which you can revert, if you have eager to make reverts.

Can you link this other imports? If they have at least the same problem as this one and are feasible to revert then I will do this.
 
----

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2012-January/001210.html

This imports thread merely announces then-upcoming change of NLS license.

----

If anyone will link 

- thread on Finnish forum or mailing lists with agreement that this import of
man_made=tar_kiln, mml:class=45400, man_made=tower etc is/was/will be desirable

- thread on imports mailing list about specifically this import

Then I can create OSM Wiki documentation page about this import
JRA2 (2021-01-23 16:21:59+00:00): The topographic database is also mentioned in the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Finland. The permission granted by NLS covers all NLS open data, including tar kilns.

When it comes to the tag I do not think it is unclear at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_kiln. What else could it be?
Hjart (2018-02-01 11:52:13+00:00): This place already had a tourism tag
viloan (2018-02-01 11:45:14+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_6110846 (2018-02-01 12:03:39+00:00): вертайте саме те що було Щоб не було островів       Щоб ункласифіед змінити на третіарі потрібно обговорити з форумом У нас зараз зменшілась кількість островів .А вже якшо поміняли то повіряйте чи OSM INSPECTOR чи валідатор dudka не показує  острови Якщ опоказує то вертайте , те що було
user_6110846 (2018-02-01 12:13:33+00:00): Я вам дав зразо к   як мапити межі села .Подивіться  у інших областях Київська Вінницька Одеська якшо Ви маєте сумнів Покажіть будь ласка мені джерело на підставі чог о Ви вперто ставите на ігнор загальноприйняту схему в Україні щодо меж села
user_6110846 (2018-02-01 12:16:10+00:00): якщо дорога перестала бути якимось c****** бо постанова внесла змыні то є тег пронього часто забувають old_ref
user_6110846 (2018-02-01 12:18:16+00:00): прочітайте правіла  Дорога між селами у даному випадку залишилась ункласифіед або третіарі І навіть якшо ви ставите резидентіал то навіщо --  хіба вздовж дороги є житлові хати ?
kartonage (2018-02-01 12:25:55+00:00): Hey there, the Fernsehturm Berlin is still a communication_tower (which should be apparent when looking at other communication tags). It's even an example over at the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower#Distinguish_between_other_kinds_of_communications_towers).
elgolfo (2018-02-01 22:39:46+00:00): Hallo Bastian,

folgendes Problem gibt's mit dem Changeset:
Die Linie die du gelöscht hast, beschreibt nicht den Damm und war auch nicht als Damm getaggt, sondern als Seezeichen und wies auf eine Untiefe hin.
Das mag auf openstreetmap nicht dargestellt werden, aber es gibt auch auf OSM basierende Seekarten auf den diese Info nun fehlt.

Habe dein Changeset daher in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55979887 revertiert und aktualisiert.

Grüße
Moritz
Touristinformation Wolgast (2018-02-02 08:04:28+00:00): Hallo Moritz,
vielen herzlichen Dank für Deine Korrektur. Das war so für mich nicht ersichtlich, aber das ist ja der große Vorteil wenn viele gemeinsam sich bei openstreetmap engagieren, so dass man voneinander lernt.
Viele Grüße
Bastian
elgolfo (2018-02-02 11:03:07+00:00): So sehe ich das auch. Die Lernkurve bei OSM ist ja doch etwas steiler ;)

Ein Kleinigkeit noch: bei der gelöschten Bahnlinie an der Peene-Werft[0]. Das habe ich auch revertiert und dem Weg das Tag abandoned:railway=rail gegeben, da es aus der Luft so aussieht als wenn sich der Streckenverlauf noch erkennen lässt.

Details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:abandoned:railway?uselang=de

[0]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182058543
Hjart (2018-02-01 21:20:15+00:00): Kastellet has been in OSM for a long time,  so to avoid duplicates I have removed this
Andrea Musuruane (2018-02-06 08:32:50+00:00): Ciao. I changeset dovrebbero avere un commento inerente alle modifiche fatte. Il defibrillatore era già mappato correttamente. Non si inseriscono i tag addr:* su oggetti che non siano numeri civici. Ciao, Andrea
polar7 (2018-02-02 13:05:31+00:00): Dzięki za uwagę,
Dodałam atrybuty w edytorze na stronie OSM, ale faktycznie nie widać ich.
Teraz edytowałam w JOSM. Powinno być OK.
abakus_uploader (2018-02-02 13:11:13+00:00): Cześć

Jak każdy projekt OSM też ma wady :)

Jakbyś miała pytania, problemy, cokolwiek - pisz śmiało.

Pozdrawiam
Jendrusk
aixbrick (2018-02-01 17:12:09+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
du hast den Straßennamen entfernt und einen Namen für die Grünfläche eingetragen. Woher stammen diese Informationen? Die Fußgängerzone ist Teil der Alexanderstraße und sollte auch diesen Namen tragen (darüber, ob der Verbindungsweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13871626 noch Teil der Fußgängerzone ist oder eher ein Fußweg kann man sicherlich streiten). Und bei der Grünfläche wäre es mir neu, dass diese tatsächlich einen offiziellen Namen haben soll - schon allein wegen der eher geringen Größe.
Gruß
aixbrick (2018-02-08 15:43:35+00:00): Hallo,
leider hast du nicht geantwortet. Aus diesem Grund habe ich den gesamten Changeset rückgängig gemacht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56186839), da weiterhin Zweifel bestehen, dass die von dir gemachten Änderungen der Realität entsprechen.
Gruß
BeKri (2018-02-03 09:35:57+00:00): Servus, da stimmt was ned ...
Bohl 5 gab es 2*, das südlich ist 3, hab ich geändert.
Schön, das Du bei der Donau-Lauchert-Schule den addr:hausname umgetaggt hast, aber was ist mit der Adresse ?
Unterrichten die wirklich auf der Strasse im Schlössleweg 5 ? und was ist mit dem Gebäude nördlich ? Das soll aber Bohl 5 sein .... (hast Du eingetragen)
Und wo soll Schlöösleweg 5 dann sein ?
Gruss der BeKri
PT-53 (2018-02-03 11:08:54+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
gem.Homepage ist die Adresse Schlössleweg 5, gem. Maps4BW gehört das Gebäude aber zur Bohl-Straße.
Du kannst gerne mal bei der Gemeinde anfragen, was denn nun stimmt.
Grüße
PT-53 (2018-02-03 11:13:31+00:00): Die falschen / doppelten Hausnummern  sind durch kopieren entstanden.
Jeder macht mal Fehler, auch ich. Deshalb nutze ich auch (fast) täglich die QS-Tools OSM-Inspector und OSMsuspects um falsche Zuordnungen und doppelte Hausnummern zu erkennen und zu bereinigen. Du warst heute halt mal wieder etwas schneller.
Grüße
BeKri (2018-02-08 00:11:03+00:00): Servus PT-53,
natürlich machen wir Fehler, wir tun ja was ;-)
Ich wollte halt auch etwas auf Deinen Post vor ein paar Tagen betreff keepright-fehler anspielen. Bei offensichtlichen Fehlern wäre es aus meiner Sicht einfach besser, die gleich selber zu erledigen, mach ich bei Dir letztlich auch so. Bei doppelten Wegen darfst Du mich natürlich "am Ohr ziehen". Gruss derBeKri
PT-53 (2018-02-08 09:55:52+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
aus Fehler kann man lernen. Von daher begrüße ich es, wenn ich auf eigene Fehler hingewiesen werde, die ich nicht selbst zeitnah bereinigt habe.
In diesem Sinne.
Grüße
SOSM (2018-02-02 12:20:49+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. 

Bitte keine persönlichen details in die Changeset Kommentare schreiben, wir können diese auch nicht auf einfache Art und Weise löschen.

Danke
literan (2018-02-01 23:51:40+00:00): еще раз будешь спамить - получишь блок. Откатил весь твой мусор.
felipeeugenio (2018-02-27 18:56:40+00:00): Hola 
Qué parque hay acá? está bien etiquetado?
saludos
viloan (2018-02-01 13:24:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Bonix-Mapper (2018-02-01 21:47:22+00:00): Guilherme Alvarenga,

Por favor, volto a pedir para apagar esta praça. 

O cemitério não é uma praça porque tem grama e árvores.

Você mesmo poderia apagar ou explicar porque está aumentando a área errôneamente  mapeada?

Abraços.
Bonix-Mapper (2018-02-06 23:56:55+00:00): Guilherme Alvarenga,

Você está lendo as mensagens que o sistema envia para o seu e-mail de usuário?

Esta área não é uma praça.

Você poderia remover a sua edição?
Bonix-Mapper (2018-02-09 23:27:22+00:00): Não vou mais esperar.

Você está ignorando as mensagens.

Vou remover todas as edições em que transforma cemitérios em praças ou cria praças onde não existem.
Bonix-Mapper (2018-02-16 05:03:45+00:00): Guilherme Alvarenga,

Alguma chance de você corrigir o mapeamento de um cemitério como praça?

Você poderia aparecer nos grupos abaixo para falar sobre esta edição. Parece que não está lendo seus e-mails.

- https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte

- https://t.me/osmsp
Geogast (2018-05-10 00:54:37+00:00): Já apaguei o objeto (parque)
Bonix-Mapper (2018-07-08 05:01:21+00:00): Obrigado.
Alexander-II (2018-02-02 14:18:47+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в ОСМ.  
Те переводы, что вы добавили в тег name:en= я откатил. Этот тег не предназначен ни для чего из: 1) переводов 2) трасклитератиций 3) траскрибций. Его следует использовать лишь тогда, когда у объекта существует название на другом языке, а не перевод. Более подробно можете ознакомиться в вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Russian_Federation
Constable (2018-02-02 10:03:10+00:00): ciao, grazie per le modifiche, per favore prima di salvarle aggiungi una breve descrizione di ciò che hai modificato/aggiunto, "Abitante della zona" non aiuta a capire le tue modifiche
Grazie, buona continuazione
Ciao!
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2018-02-01 14:23:24+00:00): Du kan markere bygningen og trykke på 'S' så får den helt rette vinkler.
FreedSky (2018-02-02 05:52:51+00:00): This sea area is actually controlled by China. There is no dispute whether it is one thing or the other. Actual control is one thing.