piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitfire (2021-11-14 07:28:31+00:00): Hallo Talpmas,
bis Du sicher, dass Weg (249270272, v2) eine Garage ist. Vom Umriss ist das bestenfalls ein (building=shed).
Bitte nicht jede StreetComplete Frage irgenwie beantworten.
E de Wit (2021-11-14 10:53:01+00:00): Allereerst welkom, er is om feedback gevraagd (review_requested=yes).

Ik heb de naam en website een klein beetje gewijzigd naar hoe het op de website van de school aanwezig is.
website = https://deklaeter.nl/
name = Obs de Klaeter

Verder alles in orde, veel plezier met het aanbrengen van de volgende wijzigingen.

-E de Wit
BVR66 (2021-11-14 15:22:09+00:00): Dank.
muralito (2021-11-14 00:51:29+00:00): Hola. Hay que tener ciertos cuidados cuando se mapean etiquetas que pueden ser sensibles como la de lgbtq=friendly porque nunca sabes quien puede usar el mapa y que uso podría darle, por ejemplo conviertiendolo en un objetivo de agresiones, siendo contraproducente al objetivo que entiendo buscas. ¿consultaste al hotel si le interesaba que le publicaras esa característica?
damianbenente (2021-11-14 07:45:26+00:00): El hotel lo especifica en la descripción de su perfil de Instagram
pitfire (2021-11-14 06:33:16+00:00): Hallo Talpmas,
bist Du sicher, dass die Garage jetzt Hs. 161 ist. Hs. 161 ist 2 Garagen weiter Richtung Norden. Das Gebäude ist definitiv eine von drei Garagen.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.75642543&lng=7.09122545&z=17&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=4027378990654530&x=0.49412613300194497&y=0.5454976405246768&zoom=0
Ser9ei (2021-11-14 20:15:15+00:00): Если вы вешаете тег horse=no - это значит запрет на проезд для всадников. В каком виде такой запрет реализован?

Вы убрали tracktype=grade5, но не поставили ничего в замен. Это деградация данных. Если вы точно знаете, что это не grade5, то поставьте правильное значение взамен.

source=gps на линиях указывать не надо. Вносите источники в соответствующее поле к пакету правок.
k127 (2021-12-06 11:07:09+00:00): Hallo ru50,

ich habe mir erlaubt, von deiner Bearbeitung die Baumreihe vom Bach zu trennen.

Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114614050

Beste Grüße
k127
ru50 (2021-12-06 18:58:16+00:00): Hallo k127, 
kein Problem. Kannst du natürlich verbessern.
Viele Grüße 
ru50
eggie (2021-11-13 20:46:46+00:00): Hi Nederehein,

Helmond?

Good changeset comments

    Main article: Good changeset comments

A good changeset comment should concisely and adequately describe an edit. You should do this out of courtesy to your fellow mappers, to avoid misunderstandings, and get mistakes fixed quickly. It makes your edits more valuable. It may even help you when you look back at your edits in the future. 

Greetz,
eggie
Sinus Pi (2021-11-16 11:43:33+00:00): Czy możesz zacząć opisywać swoje edycje? "." niewiele mówi...
RicoElectrico (2021-11-16 14:12:40+00:00): Cześć, proszę o przeczytanie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments gdzie jest wymienionę parę dobrych powodów, dlaczego trzeba dobrze opisywać swoje edycje.
lasica1982 (2021-11-16 19:38:14+00:00): OK, będę. A najczęściej jedynie koryguję przebieg ścieżek i czasem dodaję nowe, ustawiając okno przeglądarki z edytorem OSM jako pół-przezroczyste, a pod nim (jako tło) włączam tzw. heatmap Strava czyli informacje o tym którędy przemieszczają się ludzie (głównie sportowcy): https://www.strava.com/heatmap#12.00/21.01170/52.22970/blue/all
lasica1982 (2021-11-16 19:41:00+00:00): Dodam, że po zalogowaniu się na strava.com, heatmapa wyświetla się w dużo lepszej jakości i można ustalić przebieg uczęszczanych leśnych ścieżek z dokładnością do około 2-3 metrów, podczas gdy na zdjęciach lotniczych zazwyczaj zupełnie ich nie widać
Sinus Pi (2021-11-16 19:53:45+00:00): Spoko, każdy sposób mapowania jest dobry - chodzi jednak tu nie o precyzję Twoich edycji, lecz o brak ich opisu. Jakbyś dopisał "korekta ścieżek leśnych na Aninie wg heatmapy Strava" byłoby doskonale.

A swoją drogą heatmapy bywają zwodnicze, bo jeśli w okolicy są jakieś zabudowania czy gęste zadrzewienie, to sygnały GPS miewają regularne zakłócenia i odbicia, przez co trasy się wykrzywiają. Polecam do mapowania przy pomocy śladów GPS dodać jeszcze warstwę LIDARową typu ISOK - na niej ścieżki wychodzą często przepięknie czytelne, gdy zdjęcia lotnicze do niczego się nie nadają.
Sinus Pi (2021-11-16 20:17:05+00:00): A, zapomniałem, że w edytorze iD nie ma domyślnie ustawionego lidaru. Proszę bardzo zatem, oto link gotowy do wklejenia do ustawień "własnej warstwy" tła:

https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/wss/service/PZGIK/NMT/GRID1/WMS/ShadedRelief?VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=Raster&CRS={proj}&BBOX={bbox}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&TRANSPARENT=FALSE&FORMAT=image/jpeg&styles=&uniq=4557
lasica1982 (2021-11-16 20:30:35+00:00): Dzięki, nawet nie wiedziałem że można ustawić LIDAR jako tło, a faktycznie jest bardzo pomocne
Sinus Pi (2021-11-16 20:48:35+00:00): Gdybyś zamiast iD używał JOSMa, to miałbyś jeszcze łatwiej - tam jest lidar domyślnie do wyboru, jak i granice działek i obrysy budynków, a można też dodać lidar w wersji nie cieniowanej, a "dynamicznej" (ISOK Dyn Hipso) - gorzej widać plastyczność rzeźby, ale lepiej obszary idealnie płaskie, jak dna bagien czy jezior.
Muhmaker (2022-06-27 10:34:55+00:00): Du hast hier einen way ohne Eigenschaften hinterlassen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002129117 Was sollte das denn mal werden?
flohoff (2022-06-27 10:44:04+00:00): 
Uppala - Jau - Ein track ist da - ich habs mal korrigiert und noch schöner gemacxht.
E de Wit (2021-11-13 20:23:33+00:00): Aanvullende documentatie ten behoeve van naamgeving (name & alt_name):
1937: Terschellinger volksleven (Jaap Kunst), p 205
1940: Sil de strandjutter (Cor Bruijn), p 277
1967-03-21: Leeuwarder Courant, p 13, Natuurmonumenten overschrijdt de 63.000 leden...
1967-08-30: Friese koerier, p 5, Fochteloër Veen 2 maal zo groot
eggie (2021-11-13 21:19:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip .. Houd het gebied van je edits klein svp.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-13 21:24:56+00:00): Dag Avatar
1x per week?

Boomberglaan 81
Gegevens Brievenbus

Openingstijden en lichtingstijden
Ma t/m vrij
17:00
AvatarTeam (2021-11-15 20:45:11+00:00): Deze brievenbus wordt op maandag na 17 uur geleegd inderdaad.
eggie (2021-11-15 21:01:53+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.. bedankt voor je reactie.
Eggie
RicoElectrico (2021-11-13 22:09:28+00:00): Cześć, w OSM nie kasujemy drogi tylko dlatego, że jest prywatna. Ustawia się po prostu prywatny dostęp. Zresztą jest widoczna na zdjęciach lotniczych - i tak jest szansa, że po skasowaniu ktoś to narysuje od nowa, co w przypadku narysowanej drogi już ustawionym prywatnym dostępem raczej nie nastąpi.
Ser9ei (2021-11-14 20:11:42+00:00): bicycle=yes для highway=footway является значением по умолчанию. Не надо вешать этот тег отдельно.
ygcgjp5 (2021-11-14 21:18:28+00:00): Ar tikrai visos šiame bei kituose pakeitimuose peržymėtos aikštelės yra realios automobilių stovėjimo aikštelės, o ne tiesiog daugiabučių kiemai?
ygcgjp5 (2021-11-14 21:35:50+00:00): Ko gero geriausia būtų sutarti kiemų žymėjimą talk-lt liste, nes kol kas gaunasi keli variantai...
PovilasDew (2021-11-15 15:31:26+00:00): Pažymėjau kaip parkavimo erdves kiemuose,  kuriose kiemo infrastruktūra leidžia sklandžiai parkuoti. Skiriasi nuo parkavimo aikštelės ar parkavimo erdvės nes neturi parkavimo ženklų ir statyta berods ne parkavimui.

Vengčiau žymėti visokias parkovkes pievose/purve, ir vietose, kur parkavimas trukdo tr. priemonių prasilenkimui, nebent nurodo ženklinimas.
ygcgjp5 (2021-11-15 18:11:02+00:00): Ačiū už paaiškinimą.
blackboxlogic (2021-11-14 12:37:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
I made a few changes after reviewing your edit:
* I deleted the residential land use area because it was attached to the roads, included a forest, avoided houses for some reason, and overlapped other land use areas.
* I removed the name "camp" from the address you added. Name is more of "what does the public call this thing" than "what do you call this thing".
* I changed your driveway from a road to a driveway.
* I removed the "name=driveway" from your driveway. Again, maybe you call it that, but that isn't it's public name.
* I deleted an address node farther south that has the same address details as the one you added, assuming the one you added is more accurate.
Let me know if you have any questions or if you think I messed something up. -Alex
StC (2021-11-14 08:34:22+00:00): Bonjour,
avez-vous noté que vous avez retiré les tags du noeud Le Touvier, et ainsi cassé un itinéraire de rando ? Plus de détails sur la page wiki FR:Node Networks.
St.
Mega2000 (2021-11-14 16:33:00+00:00): C'est corrigé.
StC (2021-11-14 17:09:23+00:00): Merci !
alessandrocarmeli (2021-11-19 15:06:14+00:00): il contrario: network=Trieste Trasporti e operator=TPL FVG !!!!!
MitjaJez (2021-11-24 21:53:33+00:00): Explain this more. TRIESTE TRASPORTI S.P.A continue driving buses, right? So TRIESTE TRASPORTI S.P.A is operator. On the other side TPL FVG scarl is group (TPL FVG è la società) that mange lines - this menas manage network, so TPL FGV is new name for network.

TPL FGV does not have busses it cannot be operator.
damjang (2021-11-25 10:28:48+00:00): "TPL FVG è la società fondata dalle aziende di trasporto pubblico locale del Friuli Venezia Giulia" and "TPL FVG è il consorzio che gestisce il Trasporto Pubblico Locale". But TPL was founded to gain EU founds. For me both network and operator have to be Trieste Trasporti. Please move the discussion to talk-it mailing list too see what other thinks of this, if needed.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-11-28 13:00:04+00:00): no, per giusto tpl fvg è la società fondata che includeva le ex TT, ATP Gorizia, bus di Udine e Pn. I network restano uguali: non sono cambiati i mezzi, pensiline ecc...
damjang (2021-11-28 16:23:14+00:00): Ne ni tako, TPL ni označena nikjer, torej ostaja network in tudi operator, vsaj po moje.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-11-28 16:48:39+00:00): In realtà tpl è segnato: sui bus, sito tr, schermi ecc… come puoi vedere dalla prima fase del link lo dicono anche loro che dono i nuovi operatori. È a tutti gli effetti il nuovo operatore della regione. https://tplfvg.it/it/lazienda/chi-siamo/.
MitjaJez (2021-11-28 21:16:26+00:00): Na tablah na postajakiščih ni nikjer navedeno Trieste Trasporti, sicee je le link www.triestetrasporti.it poleg www.tplfvg.it
Table SO dvojezične, na spletni strani je samo v ital. Torej imamo tudi official_name:sl
MitjaJez (2021-11-28 21:31:12+00:00): Zakaj bi torej network ostal Trieste Trasporti, če je vse prevzel TPL FGV?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-11-28 23:40:42+00:00): sulle fermats e sui bus si!
alessandrocarmeli (2021-11-28 23:47:41+00:00): Il metwork rimane uguale. Come gia detto prima, altrimenti la linea 1 sarebbe la stessa a trieste, gorizia, ud e pn. Ma in realtà sono quattro linee totalmente diverse. Se il network rimane uguale non ci sono conflitti con le linee preesistenti degli ex operator.
MitjaJez (2021-11-29 06:33:34+00:00): > Il metwork rimane uguale.
To ne more biti tvoja odločitev, ampak mora odločitev podati OSM skupnost!
Z moje strani lahko ostane Trieste Trasporti, čeprav bi se s prevzemom TPL FVG-ja veljalo razmisliti o poimenovanju Trieste (Tržaška).
alessandrocarmeli (2021-11-29 09:27:31+00:00): Non mi sto appoggiando alla mia proposta, ma a ciò che dice la wiki
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-15 08:53:43+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113772645
Arun Ganesh (2021-12-31 15:43:30+00:00): Dear Sherbet,
are you fixing waterways without checking their existence?
SherbetS (2022-01-04 00:57:15+00:00): I try and check the existence of every waterway I edit with the imagery. If you found one that I incorrectly changed, please send it to me.
AlexSpritze (2022-10-05 10:32:23+00:00): "Linde" sollte als Art und nicht als Name hinterlegt werden.
habi (2021-11-19 09:53:14+00:00): Ciao Manuel

Die Lizenzbedingungen zur Nutzung von geodienste.ch zum Aufdatieren von OpenStreetMap ist nicht immer klar und muss von Fall zu Fall abgeklärt werden.
Hast du das gemacht, d.h. die relevanten kantonalen Nutzungsbedingungen hier gefunden und geprüft?

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
manuelfux (2022-03-08 12:25:22+00:00): Hoi Habi

Die Daten des Kanton Berns sind als "Frei Verfügbar" klassiert und dürfen für private und gewerbliche Zwecke verwendet werden, sofern die Quelle angegeben ist. Siehe auch hier: https://geodienste.ch/pdfs/BE/av/WMS/agi-dv-nutzungsbedingungen.pdf

Grüsse aus Interlaken
Manuel
eggie (2021-11-23 07:27:55+00:00): Hi Bierplatz.. Why deleting all the landuse in this area?
What do you mean with fixing?  No landuse here?
Your edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113747795

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-11-23 07:38:11+00:00): reverted by changeset #114127256
due deleting a huge area of landuse. Union européenne - SOeS, CORINE Land Cover, 2006.
MxxCon (2021-11-14 05:47:01+00:00): Hello.
Please note that bike lane is already mapped here as a separate way, as such it shouldn't be tagged again on this road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113747885
Feltault (2021-11-14 05:53:23+00:00): Apologies! Will note going forward. Thank you for adjusting.
Lee Carré (2021-11-13 23:28:26+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2583497
Tesla (2021-11-14 09:43:18+00:00): Откуда информация о названии улицы? Все ваши правки с данными из закрытых источников будут удалены комитетом.
Dimitar155 (2021-11-22 22:04:56+00:00): Здравей suricatus1,

Изглежда че случайно си преместил точки от https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439598934. Ако не си сигурен дали някоя точка е свързана с друг обект можеш да натиснеш Ctrl+Shift+D за да свалиш всички пътища, които са свързани с нея.

Поздрави,
Димитър
suricactus1 (2021-11-22 22:31:20+00:00): Здравей, Димитър,

Благодаря за поправката. Да, опитвам се да изтегля всички свързани обекти, но специално за тази редакция отне адски много време и ударих няколко участъка "през просото", което дава и отражение. Като цяло трябва да се избягва използването на административни граници за какъвто и друг обект, защото административните граници са продукт на административно решение, а не на реални обекти.

Благодаря за забележката, не знаех тази клавишна комбинация.

Поздрави,
Иван
SomeoneElse (2021-11-14 00:54:18+00:00): See this help question for more details:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/82553/overpass-turbo-and-taginfo
archpdx (2021-11-14 00:13:09+00:00): Please keep in mind that OpenStreetMap is relied upon by a variety of services and is most definitely not a playground. Before you make any more test edits you should read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
user_8101879 (2021-12-01 16:39:38+00:00): Sorry to answer so lately : yes, you are right. The problem was that there was bad data in OSM (a relation without node/way so it was impossible to see it in ID). It was the first time I found this kind of bad data and I was not sure to be able to fix that. But I was ready to do some "tests" to try : I used level0+ID to solve it (I didn't find how to solve it only with level0, first time I used it). For more informations, you can read this 
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/82553/overpass-turbo-and-taginfo

Besrt regards
chris66 (2025-01-23 08:24:17+00:00): Hi, zur Info: Mel's Cafe ist geschlossen.
Larmax (2021-11-14 07:44:02+00:00): Moi, palautin osan changesetistä, jossa  landuse kiinnitettiin teihin, joka on käytössä olevien käytäntöjen vastaista ja aiheuttaa vain haittaa muille kartoittajille. + Mikset selitä/kuvaile tekemiäsi muutoksia cs:n kommentissa?
gscscnd (2022-06-01 13:52:11+00:00): Cześć! Czy możesz sprawdzić <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121804057> (wizualizacja: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/361113299)? Nazwa parku została zmieniona w ramach jakichś porządków.
a5ary (2021-11-15 10:31:49+00:00): 編集お疲れ様です。
このエリアで駅ナンバリングをnameに入れておられますが、これは一般的ではないと思います。（「【ＯＭ０４】」という表記）
駅ナンバリングに関して明確なルールがあるか軽く調べましたが、私の方では確認できませんでした。一例ですが、refが使われている場合があります。個人的にはこちらの方がデータとして自然な形かと存じます。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/280474943
archie (2021-11-14 01:04:04+00:00): Hallo, unterlasse es bitte die name-tags der Busshaltestellen zu ändern. Die sind schon richtig getagged. Es gibt in der wiki einen Eintrag für ÖPNV in Schweden; dort kannst du dies nachlesen. Wieso kommst übrigens dazu solche Änderungen vorzunehmen, wo du doch offenbar die lokalen/nationalen Gegebenheiten nicht zu kennen scheinst?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 23:38:32+00:00): extraña diferencia entre name e name:es
q_un_go (2022-04-04 08:45:54+00:00): In BK Schulzentrum Steig 4
skyper (2022-04-05 14:37:41+00:00): Alle Linien der 7240?
Glassman (2021-11-14 03:31:02+00:00): I'm confused. Why did you name the river in the relation as Columbia River 2, when the waterway is the Columbia River?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113750326
badenk (2021-11-14 04:35:05+00:00): Hi Mr. Glassman:

I made some changes to the Columbia River at Mica, including relations.  I noticed that there were two relations, IIRC, the second was just a "Waterway", to which I added the name "Columbia River".  Subsequently, when applying relations to the ways I had built, there was some confusion and errors, as I noted there were then two "Columbia River" relations, the second with a note, "Columbia River:  non-navigable part".  I then appended a "2" to its name to segregate and identify the two relation names.

Ideally, the second should be a subset of the first, or they should be mutually exclusive.  Having two relations with the same name for the same way is confusing, and maybe you could suggest a more appropriate name?

thanks,
Baden
Glassman (2021-11-14 22:50:13+00:00): Have you considered a super relation of the two parts? Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Super-relation.

Can you fix relatively quickly? The name Columbia River 2 is obviously wrong.
badenk (2021-11-17 02:00:14+00:00): Hi Mr. Glassman:

I think there are several items which need to be considered here:

- I do not see the relation names actually being rendered anywhere.

- The relation names do not seem to be identical to the legal cartographic name.  Looking at the Trans Canada Highway as an example, there are relations and super relations.  A relation name is "Trans-Canada 1 (BC eastbound:  mainland)", and the super relation name is "Trans-Canada 1 (BC, AB, SK, MB) (super)"

- Ideally, as you suggested, relations and a super relation might work, but the super relations have problematic rendering, as the example above can illustrate.

- I am not exactly sure what "Navigable" term's utility is.  I searched and found that there is some basis in an U.S.A. maritime law for waterways which are accessible to seagoing vessels.

- Pasco appears to be a upper limit for this activity, but the Columbia River and reservoirs are continuously navigable by commercial vessels from Grand Coolee Dam to Revelstoke, and separately on Revelstoke and Kinbasket reservoirs.

- I looked at the Mekong River for some guidance, and the entire waterway is under one "Mekong River" relation with many different national way names along its length.

- The Mekong lower reaches have an additional unnamed relation with the sole tag "navigable=yes".

- Perhaps the easily implemented and politically correct proper fix would be to rename the upper river relation "Columbia 2" to the unambiguous and distinct native name "swah'netk'qhu".  This would be much less confusing than "Columbia 2".  {;-)

thanks,
Baden
Glassman (2021-11-17 03:40:48+00:00): Baden,
I'm coming around to your way of thinking. I was looking at the Mississippi. There is a section named Upper Mississippi River (even though it's not the upper section. What caught my eye was the assigning roles to the various segments. We could have navigable and non-navigable. 
BTW take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2183776 - its the US formal marine route M-84.
badenk (2021-11-20 03:02:06+00:00): Hi Mr. Glassman:

I looked at the Mississippi, and the lower section has "ship=yes", but that does not signify much on:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Water-based_transportation

As for 'navigable', I like to refer to "The African Queen".  {:-)

Perhaps you might be inclined to change the Columbia relation name(s) to something you consider appropriate.  I have no qualms, save that they are unique.

thanks,
Baden
OddlyAngled (2021-11-14 15:09:39+00:00): if it's not too much work could you move the hours into an opening_hours tag? this is the standard machine readable tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113751221
user_11609320 (2021-11-16 04:05:43+00:00): yeah, I will. I was tired. sorry about that
OddlyAngled (2021-11-16 14:29:27+00:00): no problem at all. what I should have mentioned is that opening_hours has a special way of encoding opening hours so various apps can parse it. I updated the tags to use this formatting in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113854567 please take a look at make sure I didn't screw them up, thanks again!
user_11609320 (2021-11-17 03:16:46+00:00): oh, I see what you mean. I will put it in the future the 24 hour format when I add the time to other libraries. Not sure why I didn't think about putting it that way. That makes sense from an international application perspective
OddlyAngled (2021-11-17 15:54:21+00:00): yep, the actual format is sort of peculiar and specific to OSM. I use a plugin for jOSM that does it automatically but you can read about the details here if you're interested https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
ivanbranco (2022-01-07 20:55:51+00:00): Hi DENelson83,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1628579351

something happened with the place value here, can you check it out please?
DENelson83 (2022-01-07 21:01:31+00:00): Yeah, that should actually be "natural"="isthmus".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=isthmus
kawino85 (2021-11-17 17:11:08+00:00): Is this no longer military?
NM$L (2021-11-18 15:43:12+00:00): Yes. Now it's sure there are 4 xiaokang villages in Lagyap, 3 of which are in disputed area. And it is the last one Chinese xiaokang village in Lagyap called Basanglong(巴桑隆).
Diacritic (2021-11-15 07:07:23+00:00): Hey Supt,

In this edit you've seemed to reverted most of the changes made by another editor in changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/113587813.

While there isn't a strong consensus, the wiki does seem to suggest that "roundabout flares" should me mapped as a single node, rather than splitting the way: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Roundabout_Flares.

I've raised this on the talk-au mailing list now for their POV, but I'd suggest checking out the history of an element. :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113751342
Supt_of_Printing (2021-11-15 09:34:02+00:00): Hi Diacritic,

The other editor had reverted most of the work that I had previously done on that roundabout. I notice that the link you referred to re roundabout "flares" was really only talking about small roundabouts. This one is a medium to larger one of a similar size (but different shape) to the adjacent one just across the bridge. I also noticed how the link shows to do roundabouts with the split for the approach and departing islands starting/ending at the white lining rather than at the physical island itself, which is the way I have always done islands and medians.

Why do I get the feeling you are stalking me?

Regards,
Supt.