piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ndm (2021-01-02 20:15:45+00:00): I've unglued the boundary relation you connected to the service road -- maybe a filter would help in the future.
ssohila (2021-01-04 14:02:35+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have overlooked the boundary and made the connection. thanks for improvising my edits. i will take this as a learning from the community and make sure it follow it in my future edits. always happy to learn from the community
Dimacn (2020-12-29 06:05:33+00:00): Скажите, каким образом ваша детская площадка оказалась https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889426744  оказалась  поверх (или вместо) жилого дома? Пожалуйста исправьте.
Frans S (2020-12-30 15:09:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. 
We welcome you as a new mapper.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather inaccurate and not squared.
Please read attached document to improve your mappings.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
Dimacn (2020-12-29 06:18:30+00:00): Вы бы лучше проезд к дому нарисовали, вместо никому не нужного газона.
Dimacn (2020-12-29 06:09:05+00:00): Почему ваш газон оказался поверх дворового проезда? В реальности газон не растёт на асфальтированной дороге. Пожалуйста исправьте (и не соединяйте газон с осевой линией дороги)
Ludhiana (2021-03-25 16:05:21+00:00): Hi Fluffy,

you have been using outdated imagery (probably Mapbox). https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92081157 has updated the region with Maxar and then you came and made it outdated again. Good job!
Glassman (2020-12-29 17:05:06+00:00): Tip: when removing a closed business, leave the address tags so they can be reused for the next business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96573278
mavl (2020-12-29 16:47:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок переименовал "улицу Мира" в "Мира улицу". В OpenStreetMap есть соглашение о названиях российских улиц, по которому нужно использовать название "улица Мира".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
user_5239402 (2020-12-29 07:18:26+00:00): 안녕하세요 
오픈스트리트맵에 오신것을 환영합니다 
"."보다 좀더 유용한 댓글을 작성해주세요.
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:40:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. just a few buildings not squared. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96574531
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:37:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please be more accurate . Buildings with an extension should be mapped as it is. Please do not oversize your mappings as well

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96575070
radiotrefoil (2020-12-29 06:51:38+00:00): Yeah I think leaving as single nodes rather than ways would be much easier unless someone is prepared to trace catchment areas (which in turn are difficult to define). One example is that the Jamison Valley (way 889441951) and Kedumba Valley (not included in your edit) are part of the same larger valley, I suppose they are separated by Sublime Point Ridge but who really knows.
Joseph E (2020-12-29 07:52:36+00:00): This is an excellent example of why mapping valleys as rough areas is not verfiable to be true or false. Take a look: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889441949#map=12/-34.7340/150.5808&layers=C - is this mapping the floor of the valley, or the top of the hills on each side, or somewhere midway up the slopes? Why does the vally stop just before the reservoir to the left instead of continuing downstream further? It is not possible to get local people to agree on if a valley is only the flat area at the bottom, or if it includes part of the surrounding hills, or goes all the way to the top of the ridge. It's also usually not possible to decide where it ends on the open side, in this case where river flows out.
Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/889441951#map=12/-33.7948/150.3553&layers=C shows similar problems - why doesn't it cross the river/reservoir to include the part just across to the south? How far up the hills should it go? 
Instead if you map a node at the center of each of these valleys, that can be confirmed to actually be in the valley. Cartographers can use the contour lines or a DEM (digital elevation model) to estimae the size of the valley more precisely than these rough sketches, if needed for label placement for example.
- Joseph Eisenberg
radiotrefoil (2020-12-29 07:58:08+00:00): On further inspection, GNB has provided fairly rigid descriptions of valley bounds (example for way 889441951 is https://proposals.gnb.nsw.gov.au/public/geonames/d8218040-81e9-4828-aff8-e0db1d2797ad)  -generally bounded by easily identifiable features such as escarpments and ridges, a lot of which already have existing ways. In this case perhaps they should be mapped as a multipolygon?
Joseph E (2020-12-29 08:13:05+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not like Wikipedia, where “facts” are based on things that have been published by authorities, and “original research” is a no-no. We map what actually exists in the real world, and “original research” by surveying locations in person is our gold standard. 
The problem with description in the link is that it depends on definiting the size and location of a number of other named features, e.g.: "bounded by Kedumba Walls along the east, the cliffs south of Wentworth Falls, Leura and Katoomba, Narrow Neck Plateau and Ruined Castle Ridge to the west and along the south by Mount Solitary and a line from The Col to Kedumba Pass.” While a cliff can be pretty well defined by a line and some ridges can be mapped as lines, a plateau can get very iffy unless it is surrounded by cliffs. And then we have "a line from The Col to Kedumba Pass” which is arbitrary. If you visit the area in person, will all the locals agree on how to map this?
radiotrefoil (2020-12-29 08:37:23+00:00): Whilst the GNB descriptions aren't the best, it is unlikely that there will be on-ground indicators to where a valley starts and stops (I say this as a local who went down into the Jamison and Kedumba valleys 2 weeks ago). Agree that we can do better than an arbitrary straight line between The Col and Kedumba Pass; but there is a well-defined ridge line that fairly clearly separates the catchment areas that roughly follows a straight line. Not saying all the valleys here can be mapped in this way, clearly it has to be looked at case-by-case. Alternatively, yes they could simply be mapped as points, but that's no fun and being ambitious in mapping is part of the spirit of OSM that you mention. I suggest to start off, we at least try mapping Jamison Valley bounds as a multipolygon - to me it looks pretty straightforward. I could have a crack at it and link the changeset here.
aharvey (2020-12-29 09:06:38+00:00): RE point v area if one really don't have any clue on the bounds then agreed best to map as a point (eg. Hunter Valley I'd only be guessing for an area as I don't have enough local knowledge), it's just than where possible an area conveys much more information, about size and rough extent, this helpsfor cartography (knowing rough size and extent for label placement) and reverse geocoding (where am I type queries).

RE GNB. Great suggestion, that's a solid source as a reference to help refine the boundaries more precisely. I'm neutral to either a way or relation. Either way it can be defined by the ridge. With a way it can share nodes, with a relation it can be a member.

RE. Kangaroo Valley, absolutely you can argue if it should it cover just the "floor" or extent up to the ridge or cliff tops. That's a whole separate discussion worth having. But for now as a first pass just so we have something in OSM instead of nothing, either options or anywhere in between is good enough and better than nothing in my opinion.

Sure I get the argument that placing a node puts in in the right valley of the DEM, and then a program could choose to follow that point out from the valley floor, but I'm not sure if that's foolproof.

Still I appreciate the comments here and discussion raised.
aharvey (2020-12-29 09:17:19+00:00): > We map what actually exists in the real world, and “original research” by surveying locations in person is our gold standard.

While I 100% agree with this and frequently argue for this approach. If community standard and expectations change, then this might not always hold true and it's fine for the community to agree to situations where this doesn't or can't apply.

Marine Parks have been mapped around Australia and these are not verifiable (nothing exists to mark their bounds or names on the high seas) but there are enough stakeholders and mappers who want to see these mapped and work to map them based off government sources.
radiotrefoil (2020-12-29 10:01:54+00:00): Here's the relation for Jamison Valley I've come up with. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12107413
Joseph E (2020-12-30 05:43:39+00:00): Re: Marine Parks. Like protected areas on land, these are legal entities which only exist because a government says that they do (though on land there might be some signs at main roads entering the area), so it is somewhat reasonable to resort to government documents or databases to map them. This means that the data in OpenStreetMap about marine parks or any protected area cannot really hope to improve on the government database, but at best it might immitate it. Similarly local administrative boundaries are also defined by the government and often not very visible on the ground, but at least we usually have an official source to add them.

Toponyms like the names of villages or valleys or mountain ranges are different: they are created by local people due to human’s cultural desire to give names to places. They are not defined by a government, but by how people use the name. We can’t import and area from a government database because there is no official boundary.
aharvey (2020-12-30 06:28:55+00:00): I understand that, but I still think there is no harm and a lot of benefit to OSM containing our best effort of mapping the extent of these valleys based on both local knowledge and government sources.

Do you have any specific concerns about the Jamison Valley after it was refined in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12107413 if you can raise specific points or issues with this one then we can try to work through them.
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:34:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 

Rather inaccurate mapped and not squared.
Never let a node of a building snap to other features like highways. Mapping roads is not a part of this project.
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96575367
DENelson83 (2021-02-06 06:17:12+00:00): It looks like you inadvertently broke the boundary between the Town of Comox and Electoral Area B with this changeset.  I have gone ahead and fixed that.
dval (2020-12-29 09:57:10+00:00): Hi, atbagautdinov! Вы нарисовали ручей, но почему-то не закончили его на линии реки (не берега). Это упущение, поскольку сеть водных объектов должна быть связана воедино. Просто довести ручей до области,ограниченной линией берега недостаточно. Кроме того, неверная практика объединять точки центра реки/ручья с её/его берегами, а у вас это присутствует. Также, если вы рисуете ручей/реку, пересекающие дороги, но надо сразу как-то обозначать, что есть в месте пересечения: калверт (туннель под дорогой) или мост. У вас этого нет. Кроме того, уже скорее всего писал вам ранее, неверная практика проводить линию границы жилой зоны по центру дорог. У вас этого много. Бывают моменты, когда это затрудняет редактирование и поиск ошибок. Читайте Вики, старайтесь делать так, чтобы ошибок, неясностей и недоработок было меньше, не больше. На Серов страшно заходить, сколько здесь всяческих несуразностей...
user_5359 (2020-12-29 08:08:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
Taluk=Kollam
district educational officer=Kollam
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
user_5359 (2020-12-30 18:01:32+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/way/889445628. the key type is reserved for the description of relation. Did you know the key lanes: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lanes?
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:32:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors. Just 1 remark. Square each rectangular building.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96576377
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-16 00:06:19+00:00): Reverted (due to misusing StreetComplete for guessing), partially (due to edit conflicts).

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96926703
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-16 00:05:24+00:00): Reverted (due to misusing StreetComplete for guessing), partially (due to edit conflicts).
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-16 00:04:08+00:00): Reverted due to misusing StreetComplete for guessing. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96926703
user_5359 (2020-12-29 07:55:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:30:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and rather accurate, but not squared. 
You mapped a piece of road but did not tag it. 
And, very important, never let a road cross a building. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96577164
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 10:56:14+00:00): لماذا تم حذف العنصر التالي
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12s0
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:26:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors. Just a remark . Square each rectangular building !
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96577339
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:24:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96577629
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-16 00:03:42+00:00): Reverted due to misusing StreetComplete for guessing. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96926703
user_5239402 (2020-12-29 07:22:06+00:00): 안녕하세요 
오픈스트리트맵에 오신것을 환영합니다 
"심슨"보다 좀더 유용한 바뀜집합 댓글을 작성해주세요
태안정보자 (2021-08-07 07:11:28+00:00): i got it i thought comment as a indication of my existence. i thought since it is just simple adding behaviour i don't need to right exact implication sorry
okilimu (2020-12-29 06:41:03+00:00): Kommentarkorrektur: in Herdorf wurden die Gebäude gezeichnet, nicht in Betzdorf
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:23:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mapping are inaccurate mapped  and not squared. Don't include more than 1 building in a mapping
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96578117
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:21:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96578235
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-16 00:01:32+00:00): Reverted due to misusing StreetComplete for guessing. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96926703
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:19:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96578295
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-16 00:00:12+00:00): Reverted as guessing. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96926703
user_5359 (2020-12-29 11:02:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

By the way your business exists more than a year in OSM
Damnit (2020-12-30 07:37:37+00:00): Доброго дня.
А кадастровые границы деревень-то Вас чем не устроили? Я тут мучаюсь, с генпланов их достаю..
lenux (2020-12-30 08:55:21+00:00): Доброго дня, если я правильно помню правки, то там получалось  несколько полигонов на одну деревню (один кадастровый и один фактический), что в целом некорректно.  (в том числе и по валидаторам)
На мой взгляд кадастр сам по себе в осме не актуален, так как принцип осма: Истина на земле.  (так как его границы снова опять же физически не определишь на земле)
И для обозначения деревни - полигона с границами landuse=residental + название НП с place более чем достаточно.
Дискуссию готов продолжить в случае необходимость.
Damnit (2020-12-30 09:08:47+00:00):  [landuse=residental + название НП с place] - в общем-то спорно, да и выглядит не очень аккуратно. Как минимум границы (кадастровые) визуализируются на земле указателями на дорогах и не совпадают с жилой зоной. По границам place=* конверторы строят ограничение скорости на дорогах. А жилая зона landuse=residential - это собственно участок застройки, по вики. Т.е. для частного сектора - забор. Для городской - придомовая территория (опять же кадастр). В конверторах ни на что не влияет и служит для украшения. Так что я бы разделял по возможности эти полигоны.
user_5359 (2020-12-30 20:41:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is  the meaning of the key DEO?
mariotomo (2021-12-28 20:00:30+00:00): ya hace un año, seguramente no te acuerdas, pero es que está un edificio marcado como casa subterranea. building=house; layer=-1.
voy a mejorarlo.
Владимир К (2021-06-30 16:43:10+00:00): Добрый день!
а почему здесь access=private?
user_11418917 (2020-12-31 19:08:41+00:00): Removed. Please don't add spam again.
Alan Bragg (2021-07-22 10:30:18+00:00): osmc:symbol not matching symbol= on relation 12107000
Not trying to be picky, just curious based on slack discussions.
Mashin (2021-07-22 19:15:09+00:00): it has `symbol=White rectangle`, which should be described as `white::white_stripe`. At least some sites render it correctly..

I am in contact with Sarah and Nop and looking for solution for two color blazes.
muchichka_s (2020-12-29 09:48:11+00:00): Ви name:de не виправили. Чи ви робили не повний revert?
user_6110846 (2020-12-30 06:53:09+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70977
chnuessli (2021-01-14 09:33:52+00:00): Hallo Ulrich. Ich habe mir erlaubt deine Impftags wieder rauszunehmen auf dem Node des Reisezentrums und das Impzentrum separat erfasst, dies vorallem um die Unterscheidung zu ermöglichen was Impfzentrum ist und was nicht. Ich hoffe, dies ist in deinem Sinne. Gruess Christian
mavl (2021-01-14 17:43:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 97508399, 97505597 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97427780].
Jrachi (2020-12-29 10:17:22+00:00): Ciao danilo!
Questo percorso è stato rilevato da me, il percorso è stato approvato dalla regione, ed il ref:REI è EVBAZ002000C. E non
EVBAZ00200C0.
ika-chan! (2021-02-19 03:33:00+00:00): I am very concerned about how you are tagging toll roads in Greece. A toll road does not simply end at the toll booth, but instead at the point where the first toll-free slip road merges. Also, you have not responded to any of my past changeset comments, as well as others: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9221753
Frans S (2020-12-29 10:17:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
Just 1 remark. Please don't include trees etc in your mapping. (1 occasion) and do not include the shadow next to a building.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96583810
aharvey (2020-12-29 09:38:01+00:00): GNB designates this as a pass. Instead of tagging this as a generic unpopulated place name (locality), I think that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mountain_pass is a better tag, indeed that's how I've tried to map passes and helps data consumers looking to find named mountain passes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96583917
radiotrefoil (2020-12-29 10:06:55+00:00): Whoops, yeah I keep forgetting to add that tag to passes. I'll keep it in mind. Cheers