piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 04:10:10+00:00): I actually visited there
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 04:10:25+00:00): It is an apple orchard and so much more
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Danchev (2022-06-12 10:33:29+00:00): If you want to get e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052577939 rendered to have to add natural=coastline !
Dimacn (2022-04-18 09:37:10+00:00): Несколько замечаний. 1. Не нужно удалять уже существующие объекты с карты, нужно просто их редактировать до актуального состояния. 2. Название улицы  должно быть таким: Клубный переулок. Пожалуйста придерживайтесь соглашения о наименовании улиц в OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
PT-53 (2022-05-08 06:31:37+00:00): Hallo pd8JUHyoPJ,
Du hast diese "Nur geradaus-TR" 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14049931/history
neu erstellt.
Das Abbiegen nach rechts auf diesen Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753577925/history
wird bereits durch das Merkmal
- onewway=yes
unterbunden. Deine TR ist daher unnötig.

Diese "Nur geradaaus-TR"
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14049928/history
braucht es auch nicht, da dies
-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59827517/history
ja ein Path ist und KFZ dort gar nicht fahren dürfen.
Das gleiche gilt für diese TR:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14049930/history

Löscht Du die "unnötigen" TRs wieder?
Fragende Grüße

Gefunden mit broutersuspects:
- http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=17/8.39036/49.39701&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json
pd8JUHyoPJ (2022-05-09 05:31:00+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Rückmeldung.
Das 'Nur geradeaus' beinhaltet das 'Kehrtwendeverbot' über die Sperrfläche/Insel an diesem Punkt und ist m.E. deshalb nicht überflüssig.
zu 2: Das 'Nur geradeaus' beim Pfad ist natürlich Blödsinn - das hab' ich geändert. Dort ist jetzt nur noch ein 'Kehrtwendeverbot'.
Bin für solche Rückmeldungen immer offen - es ist immer schnell mal was übersehen...
Grüße Rolf
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
DP24PH (2022-04-20 09:16:25+00:00): Hello, and thank you very much for contributing to OSM. However, the only deficiency is to refrain from naming the "[Operator] Cellsite" and instead, use the tag operator=Globe Telecom/Smart Communications/Dito Telecommunity. This will prevent further clutter on our mapping.


Paul/DP24
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-18 04:49:57+00:00): Street name was never Johnson, the street sign says Joynson Crescent
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
mweper (2022-04-18 12:11:41+00:00): Hola. Creo que en este caso lo más correcto debería ser 
amenity=language_school + language:en=main

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dlanguage_school
Jungfrau9 (2022-04-20 06:30:24+00:00): Hi mweper, Thank you for your suggestions and for making the changes. Happy mapping!
mweper (2022-04-20 10:48:10+00:00): It's no bother. Sorry for the impatience for the changes made. I tried to wait in case you did it, but impatience got the better of me.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
gscholz (2022-05-11 04:48:23+00:00): Hi lferreyra,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Municipio de Villa Nueva":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.25369&lat=-32.43126&zoom=14

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119838462

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse (2022-04-20 11:32:20+00:00): Camino Mozarabe?  
Shome mishtake shurely...
Kyle Gates (2024-10-03 00:31:34+00:00): It's actually a level C road, accessible only to the landowners with keys.
Josef73 (2022-09-18 18:30:06+00:00): Hello, can you chenk the value of the tag opening_hours ? Thanks.
nyampire (2022-09-21 04:46:59+00:00): Hello Josef73 and kitakai,
Thank you for your editing and comment!
I've normalized the "opening_hours" using the validator. Probably this could be acceptable. Please check it :)

>kitakaiさん
OSM編集ありがとうございます。
「開店時間（opening_hours）」のタグの記載方法が違っているよ、というコメントがあったので、僕の方で直してみました。
木曜日定休で、他の日は「11:30-15:00, 17:30-22:00」で営業する、というかんじです。
休日の情報が無いなー、と思っているので、もし情報があればOSM編集いただくか、このコメントでお知らせください。

Happy Mapping！
Josef73 (2022-09-22 19:16:36+00:00): @nyamire looks good, thanks.
GOwin (2022-04-18 08:19:22+00:00): Thanks for adding these cell towers.

Instead of adding "Globe Cellsite" as a name, which strictly isn't true. You  might want to specify the other attributes: MNC, MCC, gsm:cellid , if you know them.


You can add the tower's operator (e.g. a third-party, other than Globe)
DP24PH (2022-04-20 09:25:56+00:00): ADDENDUM: In this case, as per our (OSMPH) suggestion, operator=*; MNC=515; MCC=02/03/05/66 for Globe/Smart/Sun/Dito respectively; and gsm:cellid=*.


Paul/DP24
BCNorwich (2022-04-18 06:35:23+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You inadvertently dragged a solar panel 300m and joined it to a fence.
I've restored its position.

Regards Bernard.
GrahamET (2022-04-18 08:29:46+00:00): Thanks Bernard, I must be having a bad morning.
hopet (2022-04-18 05:55:48+00:00): Accidentally forgot to add description. Based on MTB mapping of horse trails (bridleways).
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SekeRob (2022-04-19 09:27:47+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you're leaving featureless lines behind. E.g https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36711314 is a building. Also something that looks like footways and a self intersection on a parking lot. Fixed, but as for the footpath right top of the parking, a guess. Please check.

ciao
Đuro Jiří (2022-04-19 11:34:30+00:00): Parcheggio Lidl stato ampliato tre-quattro anni fa. Per questo motivo questo edificio stato demolito. Stato rimosso anche marciapiede,una panchina (che sono rimosso qualche giorno fa) e anche una fontanella (che non stata mai mappata sul OSM).
SekeRob (2022-04-19 11:48:16+00:00): Buildings removed should be tagged as razed:building and possible have a note added, so other mappers know not to remap or retag. There's also abandoned:xyz and disused:xyz for items no longer there. Then they'll not render but a dotted line will appear in the edit view. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119903309 as to the what I did.

ciao
Đuro Jiří (2022-04-19 12:26:05+00:00): Ok, questo non lo sapevo, prossima volta lascia una nota. chiedo scusa
eggie (2022-04-18 17:09:14+00:00): Dag World.. Het fietspad komt nu uit op het Marktplein. Mag je er soms wel fietsen?
Nu stokt de fietsroute... Welke uitzonderingsborden zijn er geplaatst bij het voetgangersgebied?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119839783
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-18 17:15:32+00:00): Het gedeelte rond het gemeentehuis heb ik van bicycle=yes voorzien..  Alleen woensdag zijn de regels anders..
Gr eggie
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
algot (2022-04-18 08:55:39+00:00): Добрий день.
unpaved це більш загальний тег чим ground. Навіщо ви виправляєте уточнюючий тег ground на більш загальний unpaved?
flohoff (2022-09-14 11:56:53+00:00): Moin,
ich hab hier 2-3 kleine anmerkungen.

Der linke Poller ist nicht auf dem weg sondern nur unverbunden in der Luft.

Dazu sind da tonenn an sehr seltsamen tags drauf.

Wir famgen mal mit "access=yes" an - Damit sind alle anderen access tags makulatur weil du gesagt hast ALLE dürfen.

Bei den ganzen access tags ist weniger mehr.  Ein typischer pömpel verhindern ja mehrspure fahrzeuge, und ein Rad-/Fußweg der auch mit den Blauen Lollis so markiert ist lässt die eh nicht zu.

Also reicht meist ein foot=yes/bicycle=yes 

Alles andere ist über. 

Flo
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
martien-176 (2022-04-18 18:00:38+00:00): This looks well mapped and fixed. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119840689
A67-A67 (2022-04-18 13:18:28+00:00): Hi,
There is no sign with 100 km/h (sign A1-100) at the start of the sliproad, only a sign start motorway (sign G1). This is what you probably verified.

Your interpretation of these signs is wrong. After sign G1 the speed limit is 130 km/h, see RVV art 21a: https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3:c:BWBR0004825&hoofdstuk=II&paragraaf=8&artikel=21&z=2021-07-01&g=2021-07-01

Only on the main carriageway of the motorway is a sign lowering the speed limit to 100 km/h. 

These situations have been discussed extensively. I know it's counterintuitive, but it's the correct interpretation of the traffic signs, verified by Rijkswaterstaat.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 09:11:28+00:00): Changing `=bus` to `=bicycle` doesn't make sense.
Diana IRM-ED (2023-01-02 09:01:07+00:00): Hai PraKH,
Your edit looks so awesome, I'd like to inform you that I found this highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1052604896) has crossing issue with the waterbody.   
Does this highway cross the river without a bridge?

If you have any suggestion, please let me know.
Thank you for your understanding. Happy mapping!
ScantLeopard336 (2022-04-18 07:38:50+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Please note that opening hours must be input in a specific format. Using a standardized format allows your hours to be displayed properly across all maps. It would be much appreciated if you do not keep reverting other mappers attempting to correct this mistake.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en
trail_runner86 (2023-02-06 08:16:58+00:00): Hi,
I can see Loy Canyon Trail is connected on Strava and USGS Topographic Maps.
Could you help me understand why you edited it as not connected?

Thanks,
Frans S (2022-04-25 14:29:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Use the correct Imagery. Maxar P instead of Bing.

E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.

I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119841913
BeKri (2022-04-18 07:39:15+00:00): Servus Geofreund1,
kleiner Hinweis
(ja nicht als Kritik zu verstehen)
für Sachsen-Anhalt gibt es einen Luftbildlayer

Sachsen-Anhalt, LVermGeo, Orthophoto (20cm)

die sind aus meiner Sicht lagegenauer und vorallem besser entzerrt.

happy tagging
derBeKri
Geofreund1 (2022-04-18 17:23:29+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
frohe Ostern noch nachträglich.
In dem von dir zitierten Kartenausschnitt sehe ich zwischen Sachsen-Anhalt, LVermGeo, Orthophoto (20cm) und Esri überhaupt keinen Unterschied? Da wird sich offenbar aus derselben Quelle bedient. Bing hat dort ein ziemlich schlechtes Luftbild, irgendwie verwaschen.
Was die Lagegenauigkeit anbelangt: wie bestimmt man die eigentlich? Da müsste es doch eingemessene Referenzpunkte geben?
BeKri (2022-04-19 08:08:50+00:00): Servus nochmal,
Zitat: "zwischen Sachsen-Anhalt, LVermGeo, Orthophoto (20cm) und Esri überhaupt keinen Unterschied"
da muss ich Dir Recht geben, es geht eher um Bing.
Konkret ist es mir an diesem Gebäude aufgefallen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052616507#map=19/51.14373/12.00017
Durch die "gekippten" Bilder in Bing sieht es so aus, als ob das Gebäude im Norden mit dem linken zusammengehört, dabei ist da eine Einfahrt dazwischen.
Habe es korregiert: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119844185

Zur Lagegenauigkeit:
ich richte mich grundsätzlich nach den Strassen, die ja meist vorhanden sind. unter umständen passe ich diese noch an den neuen Bildern an oder nehmen einen "Mittelwert" in dem ich durch verschieden Hintergrundbilder "durchblätter".
Habby  tagging
derBeKri
Miladpanahi (2022-04-18 07:40:56+00:00): پرده سرای دنیا
BCNorwich (2022-04-18 08:21:11+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

First, is there a physical presence of the company here? Can the public visit? Is it an office? Is it an online business?

Features added to OSM must be verifiable as per OSM guidance:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

Also none of your tags are presented as required by the OSM database. 

Thus I think your duplicated POI should be removed or amended

Regards Bernard.
Okahkonen (2025-03-07 06:58:27+00:00): Landowner's opinion does not override constitution => Access is public
mueschel (2022-04-24 10:13:29+00:00): Hi,
what does 'adv_motorcycle' mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
Oliwally (2022-04-24 21:21:18+00:00): Hi mueschel,
Yes, I realized that it was a bit unusual. Stands for Adventure Motorcycle - on road / off road motorcycles. Is there perhaps a better tag for this or is it perhaps possible to submit a new one to the system? The track seems almost too narrow for Four Wheel Drive, but fine for motorcycle.
V-Li (2022-04-18 10:02:51+00:00): Hallo, kann es sein, dass du mit drei Punkten die Unterscheidung zwischen Stoppposition und Wartebereich meinst? Hast du vielleicht ein konkretes Beispiel, welche Haltestelle davon betroffen ist?
Freies Radikal (2022-04-18 16:34:15+00:00): Hallo, ich meine so etwas hier (Lindestraße, Aschaffenburg):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21259580
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9407403963
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9407403964
Die Renderer machen einen tollen Haltestellenhaufen daraus.
Freies Radikal (2022-04-18 16:35:32+00:00): Mir ist bewusst, dass das Richtungshaltestellen sind. Aber drei ist eine "Richtung" zu viel.
V-Li (2022-04-20 04:55:40+00:00): Die Wartebereiche sollten überarbeitet werden
1. Option:
wie in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop#Haltestellenbereich_.28Stop_area.29  beschrieben auszeichnen

2. Option das highway=bus_stop entfernen, denn es steht schon ein public_stransport=platform dran.

Schau dir mal die Bushaltestellen und Wartebereich um den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7972887756 an.
user_10241830 (2022-04-20 05:08:48+00:00): Hallo,

die bisherige Praxis, Bushaltestellen lediglich als Punkt auf der Straße zu markieren, ist veraltet. Langfristig sollen alle Bushaltestellen mit einem Punkt je Fahrtrichtung am Ort des Haltestellenschilds erfasst werden.

Für Bayern haben wir glücklicherweise einen Import, den wir für diese Zwecke verwenden können.

Der Punkt auf der Straße kann als sogenannter "stop position" wiederverwendet werden, der die Bushaltestelle mit der Straße verknüpft: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position 
Idealerweise ist hierzu das highway=bus_stop zu entfernen (damit der Punkt nicht mehr als eigene Bushaltestelle erscheint) und der Punkt orthogonal zur Haltestelle auf der Straße zu positionieren (sowie ein zweiter Punkt für die Gegenrichtung anzulegen). Wie eine solche Haltestelle am Ende aussehen sollte, sieht man am Beispiel dieser Relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13606936
TheSwavu (2022-04-28 09:24:36+00:00): Hi,

This changeset broke the turn restriction: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7928160

I'm not sure I understand what keep right didn't like about this, but it was a valid turn restriction.
JoaoMMartins (2022-04-28 10:01:54+00:00): Thanks for fixing it, it seem more like a disconnect between KeepRight expectation, as it does not seem to account for two way separating into two ways. It's error is about the angles between the physically separated road and the two-way road. KeepRight also flags this road separation as a possible error, for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10100350

To remediate this we can flag these as false-positives in KeepRight and hope they start handling this better.
UggiePM (2022-04-18 09:46:32+00:00): correction: The edit was for the Railway Walk.
bob3bob3 (2023-01-03 12:53:13+00:00): Just checking something. I drove around the Kwolyin camping area back in 2019 (see Mapillary imagery) and it all looked like service roads rather than paths. Have they closed the campsite off to vehicles? I was about to add the roads. tnx