piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
de vries (2017-12-02 09:57:19+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. 
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. 
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54264694
de vries (2017-12-02 09:56:59+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. 
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. 
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54264694
de vries (2017-12-02 09:57:04+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. 
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. 
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54264694
de vries (2017-12-02 09:57:08+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. 
The reason for this revert is that you apparently aligned all buildings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. 
After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG) and a more recent and better aligned imagery (PDOK)
Here is my changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54264694
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-08-15 12:00:39+00:00): Why private toilets were marked as public ones?
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-08-16 14:14:48+00:00): OK, this is a 3 year old inactive throwaway account with 24 edits.
Nakaner (2015-09-01 20:06:19+00:00): Ich habe das Signal auf Ks-Hauptsignal umgetaggt. Fornsbach hat, anders als die restliche Strecke von Stuttgart Hbf bis Ansbach H/V-Signale, überall Lichtsignale, Formsignale nur in Fichtenberg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3058864319/history

Eine Deutschlandpass-Tagestour hat mich heute dort vorbeigeführt.
Mauro1985 (2014-11-05 21:59:01+00:00): Relazione multipolygon con due outer per un edificio semplice. Perché?
Mauro1985 (2014-11-05 22:02:14+00:00): Le service aisle esistono su osm da tre anni, il parcheggio da due mesi. Com'è che il parcheggio non contiene le stradine?
turepalsson (2021-02-07 15:46:34+00:00): Lite sent, men: Öh, va?!
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 10:13:01+00:00): Hello mikehuang10023

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap many years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20254413 was edited here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM (and your changeset comment suggests that you may well have local knowledge here).

If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
Grass-snake (2024-07-13 20:07:23+00:00): Привет, заметил что в Крыму Вы отметили много троп и указали числовой name. Подскажите, такие названия на самом деле существуют? Возможно ли заменить их на ref?
Антон-1983 (2024-09-16 16:40:19+00:00): Да. Это оффициальные номера туристических троп. Можете купить карты по горному Крыму для туристов - там они все нанесены.
Антон-1983 (2024-09-16 16:47:38+00:00): https://map-1.ru/207830.html
Ray McGrath (2016-07-04 08:43:46+00:00): Carrowntomush and Ardcloon townland boundaries as shown, are incorrect.  Carrowntomush eastern boundary is drawn too large. Ardcloon northern boundary ia drawn too small, it's western boundary extends further north to the south of Cloonfane townland.
DaCor (2016-07-04 08:54:15+00:00): It's entirely possible I traced it incorrectly. I will review and come back to you with an update. Thanks for highlighting
Ray McGrath (2016-07-04 10:47:53+00:00): Very good.  Also, may I suggest updating the townland boundary of Lurgan townland, in Addergoole civil parish, located immediately south of Carrowntootagh and Cloonagh townlands.  There are in fact two Lurgan townlands, each bordering one another, back to back, west to east.  Lurgan 'west' is situated in Addergoole civil parish and Lurgan 'west' is in Dunmore civil parish.  The boundary of each begins on the southwestern corner of Carrowntootagh and extends south. Many Thanks.
Ray McGrath (2016-07-04 11:01:25+00:00): Apologies, my last explanation was misleading.  Here is what is should have read:  Lurgan 'WEST', is part of Addergoole civil parish and Lurgan 'EAST' belongs to Dunmore civil parish.  The boundary of each begins at the SOUTHEASTERN corner of Carrowntootagh, extending south.
Ray McGrath (2016-09-22 21:17:05+00:00): These updates have yet to occur, Sep. 2016
DaCor (2016-09-22 21:46:24+00:00): Apologies Ray, just in the process of moving (and selling) homes at the moment. Will have a look as soon as I can
pangoSE (2021-05-14 21:07:58+00:00): Hej :)
Det här är en wilderness hut eftersom den har en kamin. Se bilder här: https://www.facebook.com/groups/vindskyddinorden/permalink/1410763239272575/?__cft__[0]=AZXyDp50_dpj-zZCfHS_5ZhnULYo46vVfYBr6Zjc0Vc8FnafQpKdqEAjWsUXbQXVyA_ix0KSnIzmVZ94izpS_Oex4c40PV0JvBYWTV7Qrxo_vRYrU1E6MvwWTyTjfd9DaYGaG3a7E0PAIjdgCiHpZ0dpFEZzUmzzHsnP0nv_83x2pVnjGv4ljgxn7D13Px9ef18&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R
vill du fixa det?
pangoSE (2021-05-14 21:14:34+00:00): glöm frågan, jag fixade och la till mera data utifrån bilderna
eggie (2019-07-15 15:25:57+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
GerdP (2015-10-22 07:49:59+00:00): please review: the tag 
highway=pass seems to describe ways which should be tagged highway=service,service=parking_aisle ?
I've changed it to that, hope I got right.
Is the area enclosed by way 258615367
really also amenity=parking?
cadsauxk (2015-02-08 21:30:42+00:00): Reacertando de novo o trevo, vários nós estavam desconectados.
Sanderd17 (2016-01-17 16:34:05+00:00): Het is een eindje geleden dat ik nog in centrum WRB geweest ben. Is het pad achter Westvlees verdwenen? 

Zie http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172510889 http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/dNA
Polarbear (2017-03-23 22:53:48+00:00): Hallo, was du hier way 301907882 in bing siehst, ist eine bewirtschaftete Ackerfläche, also landuse=farmland, gut an den regelmässigen Traktorspuren zu erkennen. natural=grassland wird für natürliche, unbewirtschaftete Graslandschaft verwendet. 
Korrigiert.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-27 20:21:14+00:00): To skrżyżowanie jest przekombinowane: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3060864883
Pójdzie do uproszczenia.
muralito (2017-10-27 18:29:52+00:00): Agustin, podes revisar este cambio que hiciste pasando de service a residential si son correctos, que por la imagen aerea no parece que pasara un auto por ahi.
AgusQui (2017-10-27 21:39:47+00:00): Ni idea porque hice ese cambio, lo pasé a footway, nunca anduve por ahí, parecen pasillos
jardin (2016-12-24 18:10:50+00:00): en face l'hopital c'est une citée Larbi Kouider
naoliv (2015-04-01 19:08:07+00:00): LDiego, porque você alterou a rodovia para trunk?
Jojo4u (2015-11-11 22:10:59+00:00): Hallo tsempi, bist du sicher dass die Kreuzung Stuttgarter Str./Am Wasserturm richtig ist? Da scheinen einige Verbindungen zu fehlen. Schau's dir bitte nochmal an.
Gibt auch eine Notiz dazu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/467027

LG Joachim
Mammi71 (2015-07-10 20:57:00+00:00): Sorry, hier sind einige Änderungen misslungen:
- Aufzug Bahnsteig 2+3 an der falschen Stelle und wenn man sich die Detailmühe macht, die Treppenöffnungen zu mappen, sollte man die Verhältnisse vor Ort genau kennen und auch exakt mappen. Diese Änderungen hier sind kein Abbild der Realität.
- Anbindung Aufzug an den Bahnsteig 1 falsch. Der Aufzug hat an der West- und Ostseite Türen, nicht direkt zum Bahnsteig
- Aufzug an der östlichen Unterführung sitzt unter dem runden Dach und nicht mitten auf dem Weg, Treppen und Wege, deren Lage vorher halbwegs genau waren sind jetzt durch den eingefügten Aufzug verschoben.

Mammi
Peda (2014-11-02 12:36:17+00:00): Sehr schön, dass du die Parkplätze so detailiert gemappt hast. Sollte man nicht auch noch den Behinderten- und den Mutter-Kind-Parkplatz jeweils gesondert taggen? Und irgendwann sollten wir auch noch sauberes Indoormapping machen.
DinnaF (2018-09-13 12:23:34+00:00): The way #19400367, v4 Is a PRIVATE driveway. This is NOT a service road. This is NOT open to any public for any reason.
freebeer (2018-09-18 20:23:21+00:00): and just two days ago it was correctly re-tagged to be a private driveway:

   Edited 2 days ago by andrewpmk
   Version #5 · Changeset #62648285

Tags

   access  private
   highway service
   service driveway
.
there is no reason to have deleted it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19400367/history
DinnaF (2018-09-19 03:46:34+00:00): The public seems to believe it's a road because GPS has it on a map. I own it and do not want it on any public map, there's my reason.
ybon (2014-12-18 18:18:22+00:00): @malcolmh, why are you still removing "harbour:category" tags to put your parasite tags inplace (seamark:harbour:category)?
cadsauxk (2014-12-25 20:55:10+00:00): O código da rodovia deve ser colocado campo ref e não deve ser repetido no campo nome. Quando for mapear vias de terra é interessante também incluir a descrução da superfície pelo campo surface com valores como unpaved ou ground.

Corrigido em
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27696344
ToniE (2017-06-08 12:01:58+00:00): Hallo Dominik,

ich hätte eine Frage zum Way "Vordersteig (29224694)"

sollte man oneway:except=bicycle nicht durch cycleway=opposite ersetzen?

"oneway:except" gibt es übrigens nicht, wenn, dann sollte es "oneway:bicycle=no" heißen.

Danke und Gruß
TOni
SomeoneElse (2018-01-15 10:09:22+00:00): I'm guessing that the shoe shop https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276871620/history isn't inside a phone box - presumably there's a phone box one side or other of the shop?
fitzsimons (2018-01-15 11:23:41+00:00): It's too long ago to remember much about this edit. The phone box is the one next to the postboxes at the DO. I can't see a shoe shop inside it. Are you seeing something I'm not?
SomeoneElse (2018-01-17 21:49:08+00:00): I was looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276871620 which has tags "shop=shoes" and "booth=KX100" on it.  Maybe http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=276871620 shows the change clearer?
fitzsimons (2018-01-17 22:22:54+00:00): Well spotted. I see what you mean. Hopefully all sorted now.
eggie (2017-10-24 08:29:08+00:00): Opnieuw welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:37:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125258120/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
Dakon (2015-06-24 16:42:16+00:00): Du hast bei einigen Gleisen electrified=contact_line durch =no ersetzt, aber power:type overhead nicht entfernt. War das ein Versehen?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-08-22 13:59:56+00:00): caminhos sem tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302114105/history
Nakaner (2015-07-31 18:33:22+00:00): Kann das Signal wirklich nur Vr 0 anzeigen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1758142241/history
Nakaner (2015-07-31 18:37:14+00:00): noch so ein Exemplar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1758142241/history
mapper999 (2015-08-01 08:24:19+00:00): Keine Ahnung. Eventuell auch noch vr1 oder vr2
Da hätte ich vielleicht noch ein fixme dran hängen können.
b-unicycling (2022-08-26 10:05:29+00:00): If you remember, what "stile=g" refers to, could you specify or delete the "stile=g"? You seem to have done a lot of hiking, good on you!
dudone (2022-08-26 19:00:24+00:00): Changed to gate.  Seem to have got my fingers in a muddle so most of these stile=g should be barrier=gate.
Shernott (2015-07-19 09:36:31+00:00): Hi Mathieu,

access=no would block any kind of access, including pedestrians and horses, which would then have to be allowed explicitly too (like you did with bicycle=yes). A much simpler way is to use a more specific block: motor_vehicle=forestry. Fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32729267

Cheers,
Shernott
mathieuS (2015-07-19 19:38:27+00:00): Thanks !
Shernott (2015-07-19 09:36:49+00:00): Hi Mathieu,

access=no would block any kind of access, including pedestrians and horses, which would then have to be allowed explicitly too (like you did with bicycle=yes). A much simpler way is to use a more specific block: motor_vehicle=forestry. Fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32729267

Cheers,
Shernott
mathieuS (2015-07-19 19:38:21+00:00): Thanks !
rivermont (2019-08-17 16:26:31+00:00): Hi anjbe,
Can you verify that there are (or were) actual spikes at the exit to the campground (https://osm.org/node/3064367385)?
According to note 381519 routers cannot get out of the campground because of this.
Thanks,
Will
pettydisagree (2019-08-17 20:08:47+00:00): I’m certain that if I put the tag there that the spikes were physically present.

Spikes are a common one‐way barrier. Why can’t a router handle them? Does it need more tags, or different tags?
rivermont (2019-08-17 22:25:11+00:00): Frankly it seems fine to me; both OSRM and GraphHopper on the main site can route past it just fine.
It could be that the access tag added a couple months after the note was open actually solved it.
I'll close the note, hopefully there's no more problems.
Thanks
werner2101 (2018-01-14 09:59:32+00:00): Strange relation type. is there a pipeline parallel to the road? Is ward_7 the name of the pipeline?
kreuzschnabel (2017-03-20 08:17:27+00:00): Du hast in diesem CS im Gewerbegebiet westlich Wolfskehlen die T-Kreuzung zur Y-Kreuzung umgebaut. Sieht die jetzt wirklich so aus, oder war das ein Versehen? Ich hab mal wieder auf Verdacht eine T-Kreuzung draus gemacht. Siehe auch http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/933901
jEmqo (2017-03-24 19:35:57+00:00): Ja, die Kreuzung wurde derart umgebaut. Bitte wieder zurückändern und in Zukunft zweimal überlegen, bevor Du auf Verdacht ungesehen Changesets rückgängig machst.
kreuzschnabel (2017-03-24 20:17:55+00:00): Ich habe keinen ganzen Changeset rückgängig gemacht, nur einen Node verschoben. Nach bestem Wissen zurückgebaut (ein Revert wäre natürlich einfacher, aber mein Reverter spinnt gerade). Was mich vor allem stutzig gemacht hat, waren die harten 45°-Knicke beidseits in der Oppenheimer Straße. Das sah mir ganz nach einer verunglückten Node-Verschiebung aus. 

Hast du GPX-Aufzeichnungen vom aktuellen Verlauf? Auf dem Server ist an GPS-Tracks nur die alte Kreuzung zu finden. 

Den separaten Radweg an der Oppenheimer Str. nach Osten hab ich deshalb entfernt, weil er da schon als cycleway=lane an die Straße getaggt ist. Entweder separat oder getaggt, aber nicht beides. 

Wahrscheinlich hab ich am Wochenende mal Luft, um mir die Stelle anzuschauen. Sorry nochmal für den Fehlumbau!
kreuzschnabel (2017-03-25 17:36:01+00:00): Ist ab sofort perfekt.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-26 11:04:58+00:00): Taka relacja: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4019705 nie ma sensu. Po pierwsze, żadna nawigacja nie poprowadzi w lewo, ponieważ Aleja Piłsudskiego jest jednokierunkowa, a po drugie ta relacja jest zrobiona nieprawidłowo, więc i tak nie miałaby szansy zadziałać.
nyuriks (2017-10-15 02:29:42+00:00): Доброго времени, я удалю https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4020329 - relation не надо использовать как категорию (представьте все mcDonalds в одном rel). Я поставлю name:etymology:wikidata/wikipedia на все обьекты.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-03-14 11:59:42+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1709836 ?
tordans (2019-01-05 13:37:53+00:00): Hi Krille, der Weg von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302321860#map=19/52.47097/13.44434 müsste IMO in mehre Teile geteilt sein mit "Hausdurchgang" in der Mitte. Ich würde ihn aber eher löschen, da wenig Relevant an der Stelle. Was meinst du?
Krillle (2019-01-08 16:33:03+00:00): Hey tordans.

Danke, dass du fragst, bevor du etwas veränderst.

Ich meine: Löschen sollte man vorhandene Daten grundsätzlich nicht. Auch wenn du sie selbst nicht für relevant hälst, weißt die nie, für wen sie das aber vielleicht doch sind. 

Also entweder einfach lassen, oder aber verbessern. 
Der Weg geht an dem Remisen-Haus rechts vorbei. Der Durchgang wäre also nur zur Straße hin.

Viele Grüße, Christian
Alan Bragg (2016-08-29 10:24:04+00:00): What is this way without tags?
Alan Bragg (2016-08-29 21:00:07+00:00): I'm finding these ways that appear to be gps tracks converted into ways without tags.
Can they be deleted?
chimani (2016-08-30 14:22:04+00:00): Hi Alan, Feel free to edit anything you see will improve the map. I can't recall exactly the history there but my novice OSM skills may have contributed to some of this poor data.
Asteliks (2021-03-19 10:02:48+00:00): Pewnie już nie mapujesz ale zaryzykuję. Widzę że na wielu drogach dodałeś bicycle=yes przy czym w międzyczasie infrastruktura została rozbudowana i równolegle do dróg powstały drogi rowerowe a zgodnie z kodeksem ruchu drogowego, jeżeli w kierunku, w którym jedzie rowerzysta wyznaczono drogę lub pas dla rowerów, to ma on obowiązek korzystania z nich. Co efektywnie oznacza bicycle=no dla drogi po której poruszają się samochody. Jest to ważne z punktu widzenia nawigacji. Jakbyś mógł się za to zabrać to byłoby genialnie ale jeżeli nie to ja się za to później zabiorę
Владимир К (2015-12-23 06:20:25+00:00): ТСЖ нужно прописывать в operator, а не в название
Eebie (2015-03-28 19:29:05+00:00): Vandaag reeds ik over de N2 richting Hasselt. Dat is altijd rechtdoor. Aan het kruispunt met de Hasseltsesteenweg 
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302359472/history) stuurde OSMAND mij rechtsaf, de Hasseltsesteenweg op, de rotonde rond en dan terug naar de N2. Ik wilde dit even nakijken en corrigeren maar het is nogal ingewikkeld getagd met die relatie. Gelieve na te kijken? 

Groeten,

Erik
escada (2015-03-28 19:44:09+00:00): Ik zie feitelijk niks verkeerd aan het kruispunt. Heb nu ook een verkeerslicht gezet op de Hasseltsesteenweg. Misschien dat OsmAnd het verkeerslicht op de N2 zo zwaar bestrafte dat de omweg beter was ?

Ook osrm geeft de route volledig rechtdoor: http://osrm.at/bzj (zelfs voor de wijziging)
de vries (2017-12-02 10:44:14+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. The reason for this revert is that you apparently alligned all builbings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG).; #here is my cangeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54265838
de vries (2017-12-02 10:44:24+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. The reason for this revert is that you apparently alligned all builbings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG).; #here is my cangeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54265838
user_5359 (2023-04-04 18:15:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/302387348. Is there an difference between your step_number and step_count (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:step_count)
MichaelCollinson (2023-04-05 06:08:29+00:00): No, the same. Thanks for pointing it out. I have now changed it.
de vries (2017-12-02 10:44:16+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. The reason for this revert is that you apparently alligned all builbings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG).; #here is my cangeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54265838
de vries (2017-12-02 10:44:19+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. The reason for this revert is that you apparently alligned all builbings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG).; #here is my cangeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54265838
de vries (2017-12-02 10:44:47+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. The reason for this revert is that you apparently alligned all builbings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG).; #here is my cangeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54265838
sorbovit (2017-10-22 22:23:02+00:00): Czy ulice Jagodowa i Kwiatowa istnieją na pewno? Ze zdjęć ortofoto wynika, że Kwiatowa na odcinku Olkuska-Jagodowa powinna być oznaczona co najwyżej jako track - o ile istnieje. Podobnie Jagodowa na odcinku od Kwiatowej do Jurajskiej wygląda na co najmniej podejrzaną. A w ogóle wg ogrodzieniec.e-mapa.net Kwiatowa to odcinek Jagodowej, Olkuska to Wierzbowa i viceversa. Nazewnictwo poprawiłem, reszta do weryfikacji w terenie, bo ta kontrola to coś słabo wypadła.
de vries (2017-12-02 10:44:54+00:00): Hi, I've partly reverted this changeset. I've only reverted building nodes that had you as last editor. The reason for this revert is that you apparently alligned all builbings with Bing imagery, which has a huge offset. After reverting I checked the data with the official data source (BAG).; #here is my cangeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54265838
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-02-28 05:44:15+00:00): Does operator:type=private mean that these toilets are not available to a passerby?  Could this be re-tagged to access=private?
Hjart (2014-11-20 12:10:00+00:00): Har du gps-spor for cykelstien som du kan lægge op? Vi andre sætter pris på ihvertfald til en vis grad at kunne vurdere ændringers validitet.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-03-07 13:40:44+00:00): Hi. In this changeset you added exactly the same buildings as you did in ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25264593 ). they are exactly on top of the others! How did you manage that? I've deleted these new overlapping buildings in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46652417
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-09 16:57:20+00:00): Salut,

la contrainte de conversion que vous avez créée:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12581902

(Interdit de revenir sur la même route / no_u_turn) Est-ce une restriction signalée (y a-t-il un signe "monde réel" correspondant)?

Les restrictions du type interdit au retour sur le même itinéraire ne sont pas nécessaires, sauf si elles sont signalées sur le terrain.

Les restrictions inutiles créent plusieurs problèmes, tels que des difficultés lors de l'édition des membres et un rendu incorrect des noms sur la carte en raison, entre autres, de microsegmentation.

Pour mieux comprendre, consultez cette discussion sur le sujet:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

Et les alertes au tout début du Wiki sur les restrictions de conversion:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Pourriez-vous évaluer et, le cas échéant, exclure cette restriction?
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-10 16:05:11+00:00): Bonjour,

veuillez ignorer le message concernant les restrictions de conversion que j'ai envoyé.
brightj (2022-11-11 16:45:27+00:00): Why is it called "West of Tower Wall" if … it's east of Tower Wall?
syntex (2021-02-19 12:30:10+00:00): Nie sklejaj w przyszłości obszarów zagospodarowania z drogami
dieterdreist (2016-07-05 14:18:53+00:00): fontana di trevi is a world famous fountain, what it surely is not, is a reservoir landuse.