piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ahtojää (2022-07-27 20:27:58+00:00): I have not admitted anything. I fixed the error you had found in my edits using the OSM wiki as a source. 

I see that it is important for you to defend your own point of view about this marking method, but it is important for you to realize that the OpenStreetMap map is used by others and it is created according to the principles of the community. The community includes others besides you. Please show respect to others - just not try to force everyone to agree with your own opinions.

I have also reported you to defend myself, to report you of once again trying to create edit wars and the offensive tone in the discussions. I myself will refrain from this activity, which you yourself repressed in this case as well.
Ahtojää (2022-07-27 20:43:57+00:00): None of the statements you made in your message 2022-07-27 20:20:37 UTC are true, but rather your own thoughts.
archie (2022-07-27 22:55:19+00:00): It's a bit tragic:

a) in your argument in your last before the last comment you are acknowleding what I am saying all along; you are in for changing correct tagging; that's your business, 

b) you seem to be unaware of what an edit war is.
archie (2022-07-28 16:10:13+00:00): Please do let me supplement this case w the cs in which you were vandalising (vandalism = because it took other mpppers time and effort to restore the orig data). So that we know what we are talking about:

a) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101877215

b) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99671779

c) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99672241

d) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101874492 

e) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100832540 

f) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101843824 

g) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118911848 

i) https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120782789 
This cs wasn't appreciatet by an other mapper either; take a look att their comment on your "fix"-cs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/736830291.
SomeoneElse (2022-08-01 16:45:50+00:00): Hello Haisuli, hello archie,
First things first, "bicycle=designated; foot=designated; highway=path; surface=paved" and "bicycle=designated; foot=designated; highway=cycleway; surface=paved" are both perfectly valid for this sort of link used by people on foot and on bicycles.
Changing one to the other isn't a "fix" (and it is always better to use more meaningful changeset comments than just "fix").
Likewise, changing one to the other isn't "vandalism" either - but changing values back and forth is just pointless.
Best Regards,
Andy (from the Data Working Group)
highflyer74 (2022-08-03 06:33:39+00:00): Moin! Hier scheint einiges im Argen zu sein:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=12.14503&lat=54.09157&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Vielleicht kannst du das noch verbessern. Viele Grüße!
HMT-HRO-MaMe (2022-08-03 06:35:48+00:00): Danke, ich schaue es mir Ende der Woche noch einmal an! :-)
HMT-HRO-MaMe (2022-08-12 06:23:12+00:00): Ich hatte jetzt gar nicht mehr groß drauf geachtetet, aber entweder sind die Fehler bei meinen Edits schon verschwunden, oder jemand hat mir dabei unter die Arme gegriffen :-)
DD1GJ (2022-07-28 10:41:43+00:00): Wäre das Sonnenstudie nicht eher https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dtanning_salon ?
holzi26 (2022-07-28 11:14:52+00:00): Hi, das würde auch gehen. Wenn man bei der Punkterstellung in der Suche "Sonnenstudio" eingibt, erstellt er es per default mit beauty=tanning. Ich weiß nicht was dann besser ist?
DD1GJ (2022-07-29 10:03:36+00:00): shop=beauty ist eher in Richtung Schönheitssalon mit Kosmetik- Fachpersonal. leisure=tanning_salon ist dann der "Supermarkt" mit zahlreichen Kabinen. Falls Personal anwesend ist, dann hauptsächlich zur Aufsicht und Reinigung.

Die vorgeschlagenen Default-Werte liegen leider manchmal etwas daneben.
holzi26 (2022-07-29 11:23:34+00:00): Ok, ich habe es mal geändert.
eggie (2022-07-27 14:08:44+00:00): Beste mm  Op een wandelpad (highway=footway) mogen geen tweewielers komen. Is het wellicht een highway=path?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-27 14:11:50+00:00): Ik heb er highway=path van gemaakt.
Wanner er een G7 bord staat dan is het een footway.
MVG
eggie
mmdlvw (2022-07-27 15:58:41+00:00): Er staat geen G7 bord. Helemaal goed zo. Dank je.
Sandal man (2022-08-10 16:29:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081790406
Gracias por tus ajustes al OSM pero no entiendo esta relación.
Building?
Saludos Jan
RicoElectrico (2022-07-27 22:54:03+00:00): Cześć, edytuj proszę jeszcze raz obiekt - bo nie ma informacji, czym on jest.
oswa (2022-07-27 14:40:49+00:00): Bitte auch daran denken die Radweg Tags an der Straße auf cycleway/sidewalk=seperate bzw. bicycle=use_sidepath zu aktualisieren!
oswa (2022-07-27 14:43:11+00:00): Sonst sind die Wege doppelt enthalten. Besten Dank!
Langlaeufer (2022-07-27 18:49:30+00:00): Habe die Tags an der Straße angepasst
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124140279
oswa (2022-07-28 07:48:11+00:00): Sorry, mein Fehler, natürlich 'separate'...
Patr1k_P (2022-07-28 10:01:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28286691

hello, I changed this footway to a path, because the city footway is mostly asphalt, and it doesn't look like that in this case...you have to be careful and study it

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
RicoElectrico (2022-07-27 22:56:16+00:00): Hej, powiesz jak można wyznaczyć wysokość wzniesienia z ortofotomapy tj. zdjęć lotniczych?
gnysek (2022-07-27 23:41:36+00:00): Miało być "geoportalu" a nie "ortofotomapy" ;)

https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/o-geoportalu/aktualnosci/-/asset_publisher/HCHq0YGNRszn/content/24-06-2019-wysokosc-terenu-dowolnego-miejsca-w-polsce-do-odczytania-w-geoportalu#
yawfle (2022-07-28 01:37:03+00:00): Hi. Why are you changing the number of lanes to incorrect values on short sections of road in seemingly random locations?
yawfle (2022-07-28 01:53:58+00:00): Ok, I see now that the edit reflects the existence of a turn lane for that length. Doing this for one side of an intersection and not the other seems somewhat random, though.
emanueli_telenav (2022-07-28 04:50:43+00:00): Hello,
I do that where I found inconsistent information between lanes and turn lanes :)
Best wishes, Emanuel!
yawfle (2022-07-28 06:33:36+00:00): I'm sorry, I should have commented on this edit:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124138415
That's the one that I noticed first. The street was tagged as having 2 lanes (I don't know why) and you changed one side of the intersection to 5, without changing any other part of the road, or even the other side of the intersection. It just made me curious about how these edits were being instigated.
emanueli_telenav (2022-07-28 06:40:07+00:00): We have an internal tool that found inconsistent lane information on some segments and we try to correct those.
Have a nice day!
jojjas (2022-09-27 08:18:43+00:00): Are the location of these benches really correct? Some appears to be in the middle of forest.
highflyer74 (2022-07-29 11:36:53+00:00): Hello!

Just for info: many of the tags you add (e.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565824344) are not used anywhere else on the planet and thus will not be of a lot of help to anyone.

Maybe you can improve the situation by using more established tag combinations.

All the best!
Kovoschiz (2022-08-01 07:45:39+00:00): How about doing some research first? 
~800 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/bollard=flexible elsewhere --- I suggested `installation=` to `cycle_barrier:installation` exactly to overcome this problem. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/separation was `protection=` before. The `=not_required` prevents users from showing what's at the edge for their safety when there's nothing in parallel. 
Dozen of https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=hazard=incline and https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=hazard=slope variations. Curiously the proposal didn't handle this. Maybe because `hazard:bicycle=` is better, however this is already on a `=cycleway`. And you can complain there  is only 2 `hazard:bicycle=incline`. 
I discussed how to handle different `inlet=kerb_*=` in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Inlets_proposal#What_about_kerb_grate_without_opening_in_kerb? by using `kerb:inlet=` where this situation illustrates the issue of handling a mix of them. 
Two-sided kerbs and gurad rails were raised in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:kerb#"Double_sided"_kerbs and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:barrier%3Dguard_rail#Tagging_guard_rails_with_two_"inner"_sides where `two_sided=yes` was said not common for the latter yet. `sides=` is already used in `advertising=`. It's possible to have 3, 4, and more sides. 
And I don't have time to draw every `=fence` and `=bollard` out. It's the same as `kerb:*=`. 
If you have a "more established" solution I'd love to know.
highflyer74 (2022-08-01 08:29:45+00:00): Hi there and thanks for your feedback!

"I don't have time to draw every `=fence` and `=bollard` out" is probably what will render the effort you put into it useless as no data consumer will be able or willing to interpret that many tags on a single way.

Anyway, it was just a hint. You are of course free to do so. Enjoy :-)
Kovoschiz (2022-08-01 10:19:41+00:00): Unfortunately Carto doesn't render `=bollard` line yet. As a side note, `=kerb` was removed too. 
Another issue here is they are used to separate two directions besides other, meaning the `=cycleway` have to be splitted as well. Sometimes they are spaced widely that a bike can easily pass through, unlike the case on roads for cars. The gain in functionality and  usability is more limited to roads. So I'm not going to do this yet.
x58 (2022-07-27 13:29:36+00:00): forgot to say "source: survey"
eggie (2022-07-27 14:03:37+00:00): Beste Dirk.. Dit doet helemaal niets in osm.
Kijk eens in de wiki bij mooring=...
De name= tag alleen maar gebruiken als iets een geografische naam heeft.
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-07-27 14:04:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mooring
Dirk Klinkenberg (2022-07-27 14:29:07+00:00): Thanx Eggie,

Het is voor mij allemaal nieuw, dus ben op zoek hoe ik relevantie geoinfo kan toevoegen voor ons havengebied zoals haven- en kadenamen, bolder- en ligplaatsnummers. Ik ga er in duiken!
gr Dirk
eggie (2022-07-27 14:55:28+00:00): Mooi.. Kijk vooral naar de tagging die met de vaarkaart te maken heeft.
Dus steeds even de wiki raadplegen. 
Dus de tags die zichtbaar zijn in https://www.openseamap.org/index.php?id=openseamap&no_cache=1

en de vaarkaart
https://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=17&lat=53.17414&lon=5.41273&layers=BFTFFFFFFTF0FFFFFFFFFF

Succes,
eggie
eggie (2022-07-27 14:59:18+00:00): Nog wat leesvoer.. Hier zit een hele wereld achter.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Marine_navigation
philippec (2024-02-01 22:42:41+00:00): Is dat misschien die ijzeren paal in de winter ?
philippec (2024-02-01 22:42:45+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.136423563430185&lng=2.681806416420386&z=19.099705897030915&pKey=472739533792228&focus=photo&x=0.39012823960659476&y=0.5395154378896535&zoom=1.187178472497032
tomdevinck (2024-02-04 13:56:22+00:00): dat is de douche https://www.google.com/maps/@51.1363671,2.6818583,3a,48.8y,20.18h,73.35t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sbZGc0DuRj9OUK3i4LNcN1g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DbZGc0DuRj9OUK3i4LNcN1g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D33.92096%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu
philippec (2024-02-04 17:28:43+00:00): Maar het drinkwaterfonteintje bestaat wel echt en is recent, of wordt weggehaald in de winter ?
philippec (2024-02-04 17:35:37+00:00): Dat naast een vuilbak voor hondenstront zetten is ook niet erg smakelijk.
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-29 17:08:32+00:00): Hi kquinn,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
skquinn (2022-07-29 17:41:56+00:00): This was from MapWithAI, for some reason it didn't tag properly. I have caught it mistakenly dropping off the MapWithAI source before but apparently missed this one.
Владимир К (2022-07-31 09:04:11+00:00): тоже откатил
Lancelotance (2022-07-27 14:10:42+00:00): 上面写不下了，全文在这里：
根据江永县交通运输局于2022年7月25日发布的文件做出更改（https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bnhoxLCF8iA9Uq6mhRz0EQ  ）；具体内容如下    
（1）1路取消“两馆两中心”站点；（2）1路“水务局”站点改名为“水利局”；
（3）2路“煤炭公司”站点改名为“城中市场南”；
（4）3路新增“虎山角”、“人民医院”、“江永一幼”站，同时其运行区段：永桃路口至幸福路口、永回路口至环城东路路口取消；增加运行区段：永桃路口至永回路口、幸福路口至环城东路路口段。
（5）1、3路共用站点“武装部”站改名为“芙蓉学校”站（注：由于一个站点不可能同时存在两个正式名称，而现实中的江永县武装部与江永县芙蓉学校位置较为相近，故依据《中华人民共和国测绘法》及《中华人民共和国保密法》，确定该站点的名称为“芙蓉学校”，并增加标签"alt_name=武装部"。）
Lancelotance (2022-07-27 14:11:40+00:00): 另外，这里"source"一栏的网址多了一个空格，正确的网址是（https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bnhoxLCF8iA9Uq6mhRz0EQ ）。
maraf24 (2022-07-27 17:38:35+00:00): Wycofałem-brak podstaw dla takich zmian.
iWowik (2022-07-28 07:44:56+00:00): Не ломайте пожалуйста адресацию, не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки за вами исправлятьили откатывать
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58369468
Jakka (2022-07-28 06:37:08+00:00): Enkel een straat waar enkel voetganger en fietsen door mogen ? geen bromfietsen a b geen speed_pedelec geen enkel voertuig voor naar woningen/gebouwen te komen ?
AdmiralAndromeda (2022-07-28 10:51:18+00:00): Ik kijk het na de volgende keer dat ik er langs kom
Mannivu (2022-07-27 14:38:31+00:00): Ciao, grazie per le modifiche! Tuttavia, sarebbe utile avere un commento al gruppo di modifiche più preciso di "Aggiornamento 27/07/2022", descrivendo la modifica (strade aggiunte/modificate/eliminate, nodi aggiunti/modificati/eliminati, ecc.) per facilitare la comprensione agli altri utenti.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124144469
Alexmol (2022-08-02 19:58:50+00:00): Hi.
Why did you delete the mobile phone antennas  nodes ?
I have checked personally and they exist.
gscholz (2022-07-28 05:50:10+00:00): Hi enekorga,
your recent changesets have again created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-2.03452&lat=42.75958&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this? To avoid such errors just from the beginning I recommend to use JOSM instead of ID.
Kind regards
Guido
tastrax (2022-07-28 13:04:31+00:00): Good to see more buildings being added. You can also be more specific in their use by tagging as detached house (if a standalone residence). You can also merge address nodes to the building by selecting both and using the C key in the ID editor.
CrazyKim117 (2022-07-29 13:08:05+00:00): Wow, It is really great feature to merge addresses nodes to the building! So handy and save my time! Thanks tastrax.
berndw (2022-07-30 13:24:51+00:00): Hi

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge.

Deine Änderung des Namens hat mich darauf aufmerksam gemacht, daß diese Straße bisher falsch als Ortsstraße hw=residential eingestuft war.
Ich habe den Weg jetzt auf hw=service;servise=parking_aisle also einen Parkplatzweg herabgestuft.
Den Namen habe ich an die Parkplatzfläche verschoben, das entspricht auch offiziellen Daten.
Die anderen Änderungen habe ich nicht überprüft, ich gehe davon aus, die sind korrekt.

Ansonsten weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen.
Bernd
complete_gth (2022-08-02 20:23:18+00:00): Moin, du hast einige Gebäude von building=yes zu landuse=commercial geändert, das ist so nicht ganz Richtig. Du könntest building=commercial und die umliegende Fläche als landuse=commercial taggen.
Wenn du dabei Hilfe brauchst kann du mich fragen oder im Wiki bei landuse und building nachschauen.

VG complete_gth
aseidel (2022-07-28 07:23:01+00:00): Liebe ToniLeffers,
bitte bei Sonderwegen (hier: gemeinsamer Rad-/Fußweg VZ240 entlang der K24: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173828966) immer auch das VZ ergänzen (traffic_sign=DE:240) und die Schilderstandorte zusätzlich als Punktobjekte erfassen, wie auf unserer LGMaps-Projektseite beschrieben. Danke! :-)
#LGMaps
aseidel (2022-07-28 07:30:31+00:00): Liebe ToniLeffers,
bitte beim Key incline=* darauf achten, dass nur die Werte up oder down (Linienrichtung beachten) gültig sind. Bei diesem Weg bitte korrigieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298994955.
Danke! :-)
#LGMaps
trigpoint (2022-07-27 15:21:19+00:00): I would probably go with access=yes  for the gates. Pedestrians can certainly go that way, especially those with dogs but in reality anyone can open the gate and avoid the cattle grid.

Cheers Phil
ohmanger (2022-07-27 15:49:30+00:00): Good point, I'll update them.
JJIglesias (2022-07-27 17:20:46+00:00): Saludos. Al crear edificaciones te sugerimos q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click  derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.
Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-07-27 17:23:11+00:00): Saludos. Al crear edificaciones te sugerimos q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click  derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.

Tampoco se conectan o se montan las Edificaciones a las vias Adyacentes, son elementos totalmente distintos y creas un error  en el mapa, en este caso varios errores.

Por favor visita learnosm.org antes de seguir editando con errores.

Gracias
JJ
ma-rt-in (2022-07-27 15:44:55+00:00): Moin
Papier bei der SAGA?

vg
findichgut (2022-07-28 03:38:02+00:00): Moin,
ja!
VG
emersonveenstra (2022-07-27 15:31:14+00:00): Hi,

Please don't delete and recreate things like tee boxes and bunkers, just drag the individual nodes to modify the location if necessary
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124146247
Mashin (2022-07-27 21:26:45+00:00): Hi thanks for editing. Just a couple of questions. Why is it necessary to remove coastline tag from islands? Wiki says that it belongs there (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=coastline).
And what does is_in:island=island tag mean? I don't see it anywhere documented.
JJIglesias (2022-07-27 17:36:14+00:00): Saludos. Al crear edificaciones te sugerimos q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.

Te sugiero q empiecen mapeando edificaciones aisladas o grandes.

Por favor visita learnosm.org 

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-07-27 17:39:50+00:00): Saludos.

No tienen que borrar las edificaciones q hagan para entrenamiento, les sugiero q empiecen con edificaciones aisladas o grandes, y que las escuadren bien, y asi se va aprendiendo. En este momento mas q agregar edificaciones es importante agregar los nombres de las calles que falten y corregir la geometria de las mismas.

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-07-27 17:48:38+00:00): Varios detalles: 
a) Los Lotes NO SON Construcciones, por lo tanto son Areas y No edificaciones.
b) No se coloca nombre: Casa, Lote, Edificio a NADA q no tenga Nombre propio.
c) Los Lotes son un tema legal y de Catastro y Generalmente No los ponemos en el mapa, solo las construcciones o edificaciones se colocan.

Por favor visita learnosm.org

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-07-27 17:43:45+00:00): Saludos.

No tienen que borrar las edificaciones q hagan para entrenamiento, les sugiero q empiecen con edificaciones aisladas o grandes, y que las escuadren bien, y asi se va aprendiendo. En este momento mas q agregar edificaciones es importante agregar los nombres de las calles que falten y corregir la geometria de las mismas.

Gracias
JJ
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
JJIglesias (2022-07-27 17:52:17+00:00): Saludos.

No tienen que borrar las edificaciones q hagan para entrenamiento, les sugiero q empiecen con edificaciones aisladas o grandes, y que las escuadren bien, y asi se va aprendiendo. En este momento mas q agregar edificaciones es importante agregar los nombres de las calles que falten y corregir la geometria de las mismas.

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-07-27 17:58:23+00:00): Saludos. Al crear edificaciones te sugerimos q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.

Por favor visita learnosm.org

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-07-27 17:51:33+00:00): Saludos

Si la casa q editastes era un negocio, entonces ta no es una casa, es una edificacion comercial, y un shop=forniture.

Favor visita learnosm.org

Gracias
JJ
VictorIE (2024-04-03 10:36:13+00:00): If "The Lake" is an informal name, then loc_name=The Lake can be used.
danieldegroot2 (2024-04-03 14:10:50+00:00): Discuss with the relevant mapper, or leave a map note, please.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292187915/history/1
gscholz (2022-07-28 05:50:17+00:00): Hi enekorga,
your recent changesets have again created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-2.03452&lat=42.75958&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this? To avoid such errors just from the beginning I recommend to use JOSM instead of ID.
Kind regards
Guido
GerdP (2023-04-01 09:17:46+00:00): Moin!
Die Lage des Radweges am Knotenpunkt 10 in Hagstedt war tatsächlich falsch, aber durch diese Änderung wurde sie noch "falscher" ;)
Der (sehr schmale) Weg verläuft direkt am Buswartehäuschen vorbei, dort steht auch das VZ 240. Habe das noch mal verbessert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134372822
Filip009 (2022-07-31 20:21:48+00:00): Načo je dobré robiť takéto cestičky? Routovanie tadiaľ aj tak nenaviguje. Jediný prínos vidím v tom, že keď sa prechádzam po poli, tak keď si vizuálne pozriem mapu, tak viem, kde viem prejsť na druhé pole. Ale príde mi to zbytočné. Či? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081838773
PavolG (2022-07-31 20:28:53+00:00): Trafil si presne... ;)
Niekto využije prechody medzi poliami, niekto vyuzije routing po lese, niekto využije opening hours na obchode a niekto zas bezbariérový ostrovček MHD... A pritom su to stále dáta v osm
Filip009 (2022-07-31 20:30:35+00:00): Okej, beriem :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-10 13:50:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9915086742/history has shop = fruits that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=fruits ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only fruit then maybe extra tag like greengrocer=fruit would be better? If they sell also vegetables then https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=greengrocer is definitely better.

shop=greengrocer is far more widely used and supported and does fit even if only variety of fruits is sold.

But maybe another shop tag would fit better? Maybe shop=farm? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=farm )