piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
geow (2025-01-05 17:57:21+00:00): Ja, ist korrekt, so wie vom Kollegen erfasst. Dort steht tatsächlich ein Vz 239. Der Weg selber ist nach baulicher Ausführung und Zweckbestimmung eindeutig ein lawi Wirtschaftsweg, deshalb meine Änderung path -> track.
Happy map-fully new year :-)
Geo-Tobi (2025-01-05 18:47:30+00:00): OK, dann passt's natürlich. Danke dir. Ebenso
segi (2021-04-08 06:33:27+00:00): Zdravím. Odkiaľ ste zistili že daný vrchol má názov Muflóní?
eggie (2021-04-06 21:25:32+00:00): Yep.. dat is 'm
ToniE (2021-04-07 16:52:26+00:00): Servus RanJener

willkommen bei OSM.

Bei OSM wird nur gemapped, was tatsächlich existiert. Bürgerentscheide, die noch nicht umgesetzt, ja noch nicht einmal stattgefunden haben, werden in OSM nicht gemapped.

Sorry.

Gruß
Toni
ToniE (2021-04-07 17:05:44+00:00): Sorry, habe das nicht ganz gut verstanden.

Es geht darum die existierende Brücke zu erhalten, der Name ist "Walder Bruckerl"?

Als source ist der Zeitungsauschnitt allerdings problematisch, das vermutlich mit einem Copyright versehen und daher nicht als Quelle tauglich - ja sogar tabu.

Ich habe das Bruckerl mal anders gemapped.

Wenn du Bürgerentscheide auf einer Karte zeigen willst, so bietet sich 

https://umap.openstreetmap.de

an. Probier's mal aus, da kannst du "Bürgerentscheide" darstellen, die als solche in OSM nichts zu suchen haben.
 
Gruß,
Toni
RanJenner (2021-04-07 17:55:53+00:00): Hallo Toni,

vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis! Tatsächlich habe ich eher nach einer Möglichkeit zur Darstellung gesucht, wie du sie mir geschickt hast. Ich lösche dann einfach meine Daten (inklusive der Quelle) aus dem Datensatz raus. 

Danke nochmal für deine Info!

Beste Grüße
Jan
ToniE (2021-04-07 18:34:00+00:00): Servus Jan,

Ich glaube, Ich habe schon alles aufgeräumt  und die Brücke anders gemapped.

Gruß
Toni
eggie (2021-04-06 21:28:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Tip.. Nog even construction=residential verwijderen. Dat is  een specificatie.


MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Andrascino (2021-04-06 21:39:25+00:00): Hallo Eggie, bedankt voor het welkom en de feedback. Ik zal proberen niet te veel te verknoeien, want nu wilde ik alleen dit ene nieuwe wandelpad toevoegen.
eggie (2021-04-06 21:42:05+00:00): Prima.. eens was iedereen beginner moet je maar denken. Laat je niet weerhouden door wat kritiek :)
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2021-04-06 21:31:55+00:00): Hier heb je je pad vastgeplakt aan een hoogspanningskabel van 150000 V
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruikens tijdens tekenen.
Ook zit je pad vastgeplakt aan het water.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102433328
Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-06 21:35:08+00:00): Heb even wat losgemaakt .. tevens de brug van de oever
mapse
eggie
eggie (2021-04-06 21:37:43+00:00): Nog een tip.. Wanneer een pad een andere weg kruist.. maak dan een verbinding middels een node.
Andrascino (2021-04-06 21:45:03+00:00): Sorry, het was niet mijn bedoeling om de elektrische kabel met de weg te verbinden. Bedankt voor de tips!
eggie (2021-04-06 21:48:10+00:00): Op zich wel knap 😀

Het is een onhebbelijkheid van editor iD.
Veel mappers gebruiken liever editor josm.
Andrascino (2021-04-06 21:56:38+00:00): Oké, dat ga ik ook bekijken.
eggie (2021-04-06 21:58:15+00:00): editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2021-04-06 21:51:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback..
In OSM krijgen gebouwen geen adresinfo. Die is al aanwezig middels de adresnodes. Je kunt het adres dus beter verwijderen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-06 21:56:09+00:00): ... en dat we geen adressen koppelen aan de building_shape is dus een gevolg van consensus. 😀
Zie link naar het forum van osm. Dat is de plek van de consensus
eggie (2021-04-07 09:05:33+00:00): De adresinfo heb ik van de gebouwomtrek verwijderd. Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
praeteritum (2022-07-31 02:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124286684.
praeteritum (2022-07-31 01:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124286665.
praeteritum (2022-07-31 01:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124286514.
praeteritum (2022-07-31 01:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124286618.
praeteritum (2022-07-31 01:02:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124286309.
praeteritum (2022-07-31 01:46:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124286590.
stefanct (2021-05-27 23:15:40+00:00): Was ist die Idee hinter dem description-Wert auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110521477 Der ist zur Anzeige an Enduser gedacht, macht hier aber nicht wirklich Sinn auf einer Straße.
stefanct (2021-05-27 23:21:39+00:00): Ah, du wolltest das von Tiris/der Basemap abmalen, aber da stand schon ein anderer falscher Name :D Beides stimmt nicht, diese Straße hat keinen Namen. Bitte sowas nicht von der Basemap abmalen.
Horza (2021-04-08 17:03:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/924644155

I thought the waterway:riverbank tag was getting retired?
MapSpot (2021-04-08 18:57:33+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/15UJ

@Horza  It pretty much already has been retired, in the US at least. Judging by the overpass query, this seems to be the only use of the waterway=riverbank tag present in the country.

This changeset definitely did more good than harm, but it might be worth changing the river area tags back to natural=water + water=river for consistency's sake.
praeteritum (2022-07-31 00:59:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124286262.
praeteritum (2022-07-31 01:45:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124286566.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 23:52:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108549522 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some allegedly google-source changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105322114
Allison P (2021-04-07 17:22:12+00:00): If you don't mind my asking, do you work for the county's GIS department?
tux67 (2021-04-07 07:42:04+00:00): Hi, das Datum würde ich so angeben, wie hier beschrieben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:start_date
Wenn du eine Frage hast vielleicht den Review Requested Knopf benutzen und .. immer das Source feld beim Upload.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102434874
Neuwessi11 (2021-04-07 09:51:18+00:00): Mahlzeit!
Den Review-Requested-Knopf habe ich beim iD bisher noch nicht gefunden; muss ich nochmal suchen gehen. Und es tut mir leid - grundsätzlich finde ich den iD um Längen intuitiver als JOSM, was schon mit dem Herunterladen der Daten beginnt. 
Vielen Dank für den Link! Allerdings steht da sogar drin, dass man den start_date-key nur für die Historie , nicht aber für zukünftige Daten verwenden soll.
Im angefragten Fall habe ich via OsmAnd Live gerade gesehen, dass es zumindest dort für diesen Fall mittels access:conditional sehr gut funktioniert.
Gruß,
Neuwessi11
tux67 (2021-04-07 11:49:33+00:00): Hi,

das Start Date hatte ich nur mangels eines besseren Beispiels für die korrekte Datums Dokumention verlinkt. Natürlich hat der key start_date an sich eine andere Bedeutung. 
Das Osmand Live das richting auswertet wäre für mich erst klar, wenn es am 26. Mai von no auf yes switched.
btw. du bearbeitest ja schon mal desination lanes - kennst du dieses Tool zu validieren:
https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinationsign/example/index.htm
Passed dazu gibt es auch eine Sandbox:
https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/destinations/example/sandbox.htm#country=DE
Gruß
tux67
Neuwessi11 (2021-04-09 22:19:06+00:00): Nein, kannte ich noch nicht. Vielen Dank!
Allerdings habe ich zu diesem Thema die Wiki-Seiten versucht, richtig zu verstehen und mir insbesondere die Beispiele sehr zu Gemüze geführt, so dass ich davon ausgehen kann, dass ich da bisher nichts verkehrt gemacht habe. Aber "wissen" ist immer noch besser als "davon ausgehen" ...
Gruß
Neuwessi11
grelus (2021-04-20 21:26:53+00:00): droga rowerowa wzdłuż Towarowej jest czynna? jeżeli tak to chyba trzeba zdjąć tag acces=no
wrobelwroblasty (2021-04-20 21:58:17+00:00): Droga jest czynna, zaraz zdejmę tag dzięki za info
praeteritum (2022-07-30 17:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124277304.
praeteritum (2022-07-30 17:35:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124277076.
Kev153 (2021-04-08 15:35:55+00:00): nope, da ist keine fußgängerinsel.
no pedestrian island at this place.
mueschel (2021-04-07 09:11:19+00:00): Hi,
there are 22 "payment:linepay" tags which seem to point to the same payment scheme. Could you check that as well?
Mxdanger (2021-04-08 21:46:30+00:00): Thanks for letting me know, I've gone ahead and updated those aliases.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102591366
DressyPear4 (2021-04-07 10:48:48+00:00): Olá, uma rotatória não é considerada como link
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102435387
MakeItBetter (2021-04-21 01:14:36+00:00): In your "greenway redos" you are destroying the Cycle Route relations that several of us have worked to maintain and update. For example, see Relation: McAlpine Creek Greenway (10384554). Please fix those you have removed.
Furdrien (2021-04-20 11:56:25+00:00): Bonjour Soulive !

La RN 1 sur entre les PK 11+1030 et 13+0445 est t'elle vraiment déclasser sur place et de façon administrative ? 

Bien a Vous !
Furdrien
Souleiman Asff (2021-04-20 14:10:25+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui effectivement la route a été déclasser. La cartouche D78 est désormais présente sur cette section et c'est visible sur google street view depuis juillet 2020.

Bien à vous,
Soulive
Furdrien (2021-04-20 20:04:43+00:00): Je vous dit cela car je n'ai pas encore trouvé l'arrêté ministérielle  précisant le déclassement de la RN 1 sur cette section et donc administrativement la RN 1 existe toujours et est toujours gérer par la DIRIF !
Mais il est vrai que si sur place les cartouches et Pk ont été changé vers la RD 78 et de le Dpt du 95 
le changement de la clé ref=N 1 en ref=D 78 est possible !

Bien à Vous !
Furdrien
Polarbear-repair (2021-05-13 21:23:44+00:00): Hi marc__marc,
you added a sport=* tag here. 
According to the wiki:
"The sport=* tag is used to identify one or more sports which can be played within or on some physical feature."
There is certainly no tennis being played within the club house.
And again you removed the building type.
marc__marc (2024-08-30 10:21:56+00:00): Hello,
what alternative key do you envisage? it's a classic key sequence club=sports sports=*.
It's also used by shop=sports and describe in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ashop%3Dsports
I think https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport needs to be improved to describe this use case, I'm going to talk about it on the tagging list to get more opinions.
Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
user_5359 (2021-04-07 04:27:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/2300363209 over 100 meters, please check the position.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103663230 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:35:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103663230 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still problematic.
DressyPear4 (2021-04-07 10:25:46+00:00): Sério que vai começar a vandalizar o mapa?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102436011
trial (2021-04-13 18:35:05+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu sur OpenStreetMap.
Je vois que vous avez ajouté un 21 au bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69951917/history
Or le 21 existe déjà (c'est l'autre bâtiment).
De plus vous nommez deux bâtiments pareils, je suppose que vous voulez créer une résidence, c'est bien ça ? Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10060749 comme exemple dans le coin.
Gauvain_Boiche (2021-04-15 17:50:02+00:00): Bonjour,
En effet, c'était mon intention ! L'ajout de point-adresses n'était pas la bonne procédure ?
C'est encore un peu sybillin, et les procédures sont très complètes.
trial (2021-04-19 20:15:41+00:00): Je réponds par MP, ce sera moins sybilin ;-)
impiaaa (2021-04-07 14:33:41+00:00): Hi! While I appreciate the enthusiasm, you should really follow the [Import Guidelines](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) before importing anything. The local community has a few imports in progress, and a few imports planned—including street lamps! Join one of the [Code for San Jose](https://www.meetup.com/code-for-san-jose/) meetings some time and we can help you get the import ready for proper approval.
Tygunn (2021-04-07 15:18:54+00:00): Hi,
I should have made my commit message more clear.  This is by no means a mass import of data, but a small trial run I was looking at.  I converted the San Jose open data streetlamps locally to see how the data looks; this small import is primarily aimed at judging what would be involved in making use of that data set.

The raw coordinates of the streetlights are often quite misaligned from their actual location and each street lamp required manual re-alignment using aerial imagery.  It is also not uncommon for the lights to be obscured by foliage.  Finally, there seems to be quite a number of lights which are missing (though the larger fixtures dataset likely has them if the fixture is colocated on a non-city owned pole).

In any case, manually aligning the lamps to their location is tedious and I would estimate it would take in the 10s of hours to re-align the entire data set.  

I'll likely revert these changes as a result.
ZeLonewolf (2021-04-17 13:52:48+00:00): Hi, this change broke the Fort Lauderdale boundary polygon.
txemt (2021-04-18 02:38:36+00:00): I’ll look at it and fix it in a day or two. Although, I may need a little more background/info.
ZeLonewolf (2021-04-18 03:17:54+00:00): Sure, you can see the gap in the border if you look here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/117955#map=15/26.0834/-80.1883

Unfortunately there is a known issue with iD where this occurs sometimes (see: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8286)
PolyDunami (2021-04-07 00:05:20+00:00): The 388 bus route was added in this changeset.
PolyDunami (2021-04-07 00:07:43+00:00): Data from TransitDB was used in this changeset.
3ngineer (2021-04-07 07:19:46+00:00): Thanks very much for adding this. You'll notice I made some minor changes: the EB route was missing a single way near the end. Operator and network tags were swapped. I added route master as well.
3ngineer (2021-04-07 07:28:49+00:00): Within 24hrs, it should appear on maps, and then you can also check if the route is valid, such as with this tool: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ and change the dropdown menu from "geometry" to "Public transport routes".
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
rthik007 (2021-04-09 11:40:53+00:00): Hi shabbyliao,
Based on the surrounding area classification of road WAY: 926913133
has changed by other user, Kindly refer to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102458464.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102436595
blackboxlogic (2021-04-08 03:09:58+00:00): My home town! This monument used to be town-center before the town expanded north east.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102436661
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:35:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103663230 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 10:48:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103131686 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
!bm (2021-04-07 21:03:40+00:00): s Anm zu / analog https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97014419
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-09 22:08:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102672593 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-09 22:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102672593 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
Richard (2021-04-08 14:28:51+00:00): Hello - could you tell me what evidence you have that cycling is permitted on this path?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:37:24+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 16:21:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103279281, 103272291, 103282399, 103275191, 103277328, 103280981 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comment, newer edits still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-04-13 02:06:06+00:00): Hi Grace,

Welcome to OSM!

The majority of features you added in this changeset don't appear to exist in the real world. This includes The Country Cottage (r), Harrison Woods, Mahmoud Pond and Lee Park among others.

Are you able to explain what you were trying to do here?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-17 12:33:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108158212 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.