piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yaugenka (2017-10-06 16:22:39+00:00): Not quite. It would be correct if the area of Bialkiški was outside Astraviec. Astraviec would then consist of two separate polygons like in this example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1996913.
But Bialkiški is within Astraviec, i.e. one polygon is within another and this will cause a technical error when the area of Astraviec is calculated.
So it is actually redundent to define any relation between Bialkiški and Astraviec, because Bialkiški area is already within Astraviec one.
But if you wish you can add Bialkiški relation (not the line) to Astraviec as "subarea" as it is done for regions within country http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/59065
although we don't practice this for settlements in Belarus.
yaugenka (2017-10-07 20:20:52+00:00): I have fixed the alt_name*s of Гудогай by myself and submitted a request to our state authority to provide the name of the official act according to which the names were officially changed.
Jay May (2017-10-09 11:12:01+00:00): O.K. To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised they are not even aware that those 2 villages have slightly different names ... I'm pretty confident their answer will be very interesting to read.
yaugenka (2017-10-13 16:13:10+00:00): Here is there answer
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bwqmq6xk-oieRzJfRThiUWNaOURLY3Q3SXFfRW82ZGJEVXUw
They say that the addressing system (which includes the registry) was formally launched in 2012 and the villages have always been named in the registry as "п. Гудогай" and "д. Гудогай" and that the names "Станция Гудогай" and "Малый Гудогай" never existed in the registry.
That means the names on the signs contradict the law and are incorrect.
SomeoneElse (2017-10-13 18:49:21+00:00): However, the law doesn't affect how we generally map stuff in OSM - it's what's on the ground that matters.
Don't just take my word for it, either - here's an answer to a similar question elsewhere: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-October/017990.html .
yaugenka (2017-10-13 19:10:11+00:00): I understand the on the ground rule and do not insist on changing the name right now but they may and are likely to correct the sign soon. Is anyone going to travel there from time to time to track the change for the map to stay up to date?
SomeoneElse (2017-10-13 19:30:26+00:00): > Is anyone going to travel there from time to time to track the change for the map to stay up to date?
To be honest, it's how I keep stuff up to date where I live.  Obviously (as Canadians on OSM lists point out regularly) that's less applicable to places with a significantly lower population density, such as Belarus: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.POP.DNST?year_high_desc=false .
Jay May (2017-10-13 19:58:47+00:00): I will be there in a week or two.
About what you mentioned above on the ground rule regarding India: English has been chosen despite being a minority language because it is a language that is displayed in every roadsign, no matter the language of the province. Same for Ireland or the non-Brussels bilingual “facility communes” like Sint-Genesius-Rode, Enghien, Mouscron, Visé, etc - at least one of the two languages on roadsigns appear on the OSM main tags. Belarus is abiding by that only for commercial and street names in some towns (jekhor explained me each municipality chooses which language to display on streetsigns), but not at all regarding toponyms. As I told from the very beginning, my aim is to reflect the names exactly as they appear, no matter the language 
Following the answer Yaugenka got, the mess in those names is even bigger than I thought... with name mistakes, reverted villages, etc.. I’ve seen somewhere close to Ashmiany a notification that the Poviaži village is reverted with some other one,and I corrected a lot of Belarusian names after having had a look at my dashcam videos... How do you guys manage not to get lost?...
yaugenka (2017-10-13 20:33:54+00:00): Imagine your need to make a business trip to this village and got a ticke to "п. Гудогай" - that is the name which is used in all documents and on the web. So you search for that name on the map but don't find any because on the map it is named "Станция Гудогай" instead.
Jay May (2017-10-14 10:38:54+00:00): ...and then they arrive on-spot and see „Станцыя Гудагай” written in Belarusian, which makes them really wonder what exactly is wrong with those names ... Neither the language, neither the full name correspond. „Что сделать...”
SomeoneElse (2017-10-14 11:24:35+00:00): For info, there's a widely-used tag for the "official name" of places: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/official_name .
yaugenka (2017-10-14 11:37:39+00:00): What is the sense of introducing one extra tag when 99.99% of names correspond to official ones and the remaing 0.01% is a 	neglect of the authorities who did not change the sign properly?
SomeoneElse (2017-10-14 11:40:20+00:00): Feel free to corretc me with actual numbers, but my impression so far is that a _very high percentage_ of names in OSM in BE don't match the names on the signs.  One of the arguments put forward was that they are official names.
yaugenka (2017-10-14 11:43:44+00:00): >my impression so far is that a _very high percentage_ of names in OSM in BE don't match the names on the signs.
Can you give some examples apart from "Гудогай" where the names mismatch?
SomeoneElse (2017-10-14 11:55:11+00:00): Well, the DWG was sent lots of photographs of roadsigns and placenames in BE that in OSM are mapped in RU.
yaugenka (2017-10-14 12:16:46+00:00): We are not talking about the use of languages here, are we? This discussion is only about the correspondence of signs to official names. Both russian and belarusian names are official.
Jay May (2017-10-16 05:53:16+00:00): I wouldn't say "What is the sense of introducing one extra tag when 99.99% of names correspond to official ones". Given the number of wrong names I corrected on the Belarusian soil, I would say up to 80% of the names do correspond .Let alone the language question - many times the name in Russian (appearing on OSM) and the one in Belarusian (appearing on-spot) differ so much that this only confuses people, including native Russian-speakers.
About the "official_name" tag: there is also an "official_name:ru" tag.
yaugenka (2017-10-16 07:59:48+00:00): >I would say up to 80% of the names do correspond
Please provide examples of the 20%.
Jay May (2017-10-16 11:50:19+00:00): I've changed so many of them that now I won't remember everything :) Those Belarusian toponyms I had to change were mainly names with "-ызна" finishing with "-ына" in reality and the other way round (a lot of them), Янава called Янова officially (and other such names with "o" and "a" reverted). Sometimes one village has two orthographs (Валейкішкі on roadsigns / Валэйкішкі on bus stops), sometimes a word forgotten at the beginning of the name (Станцыя Ашмяны was previously shown as Ашмяны AFAIR), names finishing in "-оўцы" shown on OSM with "-аўцы". So yes, there is quite a high number of offsets between the official name, the ground name and the OSM name, which makes the map totally messy.
Anyway, this post from another DWG guy https://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2014/01/17/edit-wars-in-openstreetmap/  says it clearly: "(...)OpenStreetMap relies (...) on primary sources of contributors visiting an area and editing OSM to reflect what they see. Secondary sources are considered inferior and many OSMers use the derogatory term armchair mapping in reference to using these sources. Because of this, when a conflict arises, the person who visits the location is going to be given deference over any other source, even officially published government data.(...)"
Which means those "official_name" and "official_name:ru" tags would be more than useful in such cases. And which also means, if I understand well, ground truth prevails, which we were not abiding by so far in the case of this specific country.
yaugenka (2017-10-16 17:03:18+00:00): >Янава called Янова officially.
The first one is in Belarusian the second one is in Russaion. So you are mixing languauges here.
>names with "-ызна" finishing with "-ына" in reality
Provide exact examples please.
>Валейкішкі on roadsigns / Валэйкішкі on bus stops
Are you saying that you are putting settlement names from bus stop signs?
>names finishing in "-оўцы" shown on OSM with "-аўцы"
Provide exact examples please.
Road–Runner (2017-10-03 00:53:24+00:00): Die zwei Linien vom Kreisverkehr auf die Autobahn sind eigentlich falsch. Es gibt hier nur eine straße (mit 2 fahrspuren halt).
eggie (2017-10-02 15:16:32+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
user_5359 (2017-10-02 17:13:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
arcanma (2017-10-02 16:57:25+00:00): Salve, per inserire il dato della profondità potresti guardare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Dcave, se conosci lo sviluppo interno puoi inserire il tag ele=* al punto più basso, il nodo inserito riguarda solo il punto di ingresso. Riguardo invece al tag access=customers significa che si può visitare a pagamento? In tal caso aggiungere anche fee=yes e se conosciuti gli orari di apertura Grazie
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-10-03 06:11:41+00:00): per la profondità puoi usare il tag "depth" normalmente usato in campo marino.
Cascafico (2017-10-02 15:34:40+00:00): vedi se c'è qualche etichetta per definire  l'associazione:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility
cocio (2017-10-02 15:41:08+00:00): si adesso cerco. ma non so mai come definirla. tra lo spirituale ed l'economico :-)
cocio (2017-10-02 15:43:53+00:00): non è proprio sociale di quel tipo, sono coris di formazione, dove li trovo?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-11-28 14:28:57+00:00): Não se cola áreas com vias como fez aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529502376/history
Ropino (2018-02-12 21:29:51+00:00): Hi,
das eingetragene Restaurant 'Zauberblume'
ist hier falsch eingetragen.
Bitte die Position korrigieren und bitte gleich noch den Straßennamen richtig schreiben. Danke.
user_5359 (2017-10-02 17:11:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Pease read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar_repair : Could we add a tag shop=car_repair to" Mr. Tire Auto Service Centers“?
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 08:35:25+00:00): Hello wward. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519661461
you have tagged
`playground:climbing_frame` instead of more common
`playground:climbingframe`, right?
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=playground
geoephemera (2017-10-11 02:41:01+00:00): Yes. Thank you for catching that.
mavl (2017-10-02 18:47:10+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 48163470, 48163952, 48164204, 48189379, 48189450, 48189524, 48189781, 48190984, 48191452, 48191907, 48192526, 48193571, 48193979, 48222796, 48222997, 48223041, 48223073, 48225246, 48225614, 48225790, 48226683, 48226815, 48323334, 48323411, 48332700, 48332857, 48333216, 48335433.
Aggregaat02 (2017-10-06 21:23:03+00:00): changeset reverted http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52694935
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-04-16 02:03:30+00:00): [Canlalay, Biñan, Laguna] add bakeries and gas station
Aggregaat02 (2017-10-06 21:23:36+00:00): changeset reverted http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52694900
GerdP (2017-10-03 06:02:45+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the ways with highway=crossing like this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529511129
It should be tagged highway=footway + footway=crossing
and it should share a node wiith the major road. This shared node is tagged highway=crossing and maybe more tags like crossing=uncontrolled.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
You added layer=0 to many footways with tunnel=yes. I assume they are not tunnels, instead they are covered=yes.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
The tag layer=0 is not needed as it is the default. 
Hope this helps and happy mapping!
Topol65 (2017-10-03 20:54:52+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out! I have fixed these tags.
GerdP (2017-10-04 06:48:46+00:00): Thanks! See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52615712
where I changed the mapping for one footway. At this place it is not a sidewalk but a crossing, and it is not covered:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529882006
Always make sure that the node with highway=crossing is shared by the footway and the major road. The JOSM validator warns you where this is wrong, e.g. here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5143483206
Topol65 (2017-10-04 20:27:04+00:00): Thanks
Supaplex (2018-01-19 23:14:37+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2017-10-02 18:51:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the footpath with the existing highways.
Aggregaat02 (2017-10-06 21:24:18+00:00): changeset reverted http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52694850
Vas111 (2023-08-25 18:22:29+00:00): The speed limits on the highway off-ramps are in yellow, meaning they are advisory, therefore they should be added under maxspeed:advisory, while maxspeed stays the same as the adjoining road
DD1GJ (2017-10-03 06:42:45+00:00): Revert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52571545
DD1GJ (2017-10-03 06:42:26+00:00): Revert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52571545
glglgl (2017-10-04 12:35:25+00:00): I wonder what makes you think there is a café in the middle of the ocean?
SomeoneElse (2017-10-05 20:03:07+00:00): It's not the user's fault - it's a bug in POI+.  See https://github.com/davidchiles/osm-poi-editor-iOS/issues/12 .
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-07 09:39:56+00:00): Super że dodałeś! Ale lepiej by wikipedię dodać jako "wikipedia=pl:Boża Męka" a nie "wikipedia:pl=Boża Męka"
mavl (2017-10-03 16:24:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок добавлены улицы для домов микрорайона, хотя принадлежность к микрорайону уже была указана в тегах addr:place. Все изменения в этом пакете правок полностью отменены.
DD1GJ (2017-10-03 06:37:09+00:00): Hallo raibach2, willkommen bei OSM. im Gegensatz zu ein paar anderen Bundesländern dürfen die amtlichen hessischen Karten nicht für OSM genutzt werden. Ich habe daher alle Diene Änderungen mit Bezug auf die Liegenschaftskarte zurückgesetzt, damit es keine Urheberrechtsverletzungen gibt.
raibach2 (2017-10-04 16:02:56+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ,
ich hoffe das dies ein Mißverständnis ist. 

Ich wohne in diesem Ort und habe die Änderungen (Hausnummern) durch direkte Überprüfung vor Ort vorgenommen. Auch die Korrekturen der Hausumrisse sind aufgrund von vor Ort recherchen und Abgleich mit der Bing Underlay-Karte erstellt worden (Da steckt richtig Arbeit drin!) Zur Verifizierung dieser selbst erstellten Daten habe ich mir die offentlich zugänglichen (!!) Daten des geoportals hessen ausgedruckt (auf Papier!)  und diese nur manuellen Überprüfung (nochmal: der voher selbst erstellten Daten) genutzt. Somit sind dies selbst erstellte Daten. Ich bitte daher die Löschung rückgängig zu machen.
raibach2 (2017-10-04 16:12:48+00:00): Hallo DD1G1,

bei der Überprüfung der Lösung ist mir auch noch aufgefallen dass auch Änderungen die gar nichts mit den Geodaten der Liegenschaftskarte zu tun haben (z.B. Bushaltestelle und Abfallkontainer) mit gelöscht wurden.
Der Hinweis auf die Liegenschaftskarte war ein Fehler von mir. 
Frage: gib es eine Möglichkeit, dass ich die gelöschten Daten einlese und ohne den Bezug auf die Liegenschaftskarte wieder hochlade (noch mal von Vorne fange ich auf jeden Fall nicht mehr an!).
Nakaner (2017-10-04 19:16:24+00:00): Hallo raibach2,

dein Änderungssatzkommentar lies leider keinen anderen Schluss zu, als ihn zu revertieren.

OSM hat das Ziel eine weißere als weiße Weste in Sachen Urheber- und Datenbankschutzrecht zu haben. Daher sehen wir halbseidene Aktionen wie das Abgleichen mit einem ALKIS-Auszug und das Notieren der Abweichungen darauf als rechtlich inkompatibel an. Siehe dazu auch ein kürzlich veröffentlichter Beitrag vom OSM-Urgestein Richard Fairhurst auf der Mailingliste Talk (abrufbar unter https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-October/079065.html).

Ich weiß, das ist hart, aber so ist das leider. Auf der Einführungsseite, die du nach dem Bestätigen der Mailadresse zu Gesicht bekommst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome): "Ausserdem ist es wichtig, nichts von anderen Quellen (auch nicht aus Papierkarten) zu kopieren, da OpenStreetMap das Urheberrecht sehr ernst nimmt." Das ist die Kurzfassung der Vereinbarung für Mitwirkende, der jeder Mitwirkende zugestimmt hat. https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms

Viele Grüße

Michael
raibach2 (2017-10-04 21:31:18+00:00): Hallo Michael,
akzeptiert!
Wie kann ich jedoch die nicht urheberrechtlich (und versehentlich im gleichen Changeset übertragenen Daten) wie z.B. die Korrektur der Bushaltestelle, Bezeichnung von kommunalen Gebäuden, Abfallcontainern usw wiederherstellen.
Dies ist eine technische Frage.

viele Grüße
Jürgen
DD1GJ (2017-10-05 06:05:20+00:00): Hallo Jürgen,

danke für Dein Verständnis. Die von mir durchgeführten Reverts Deiner 3 problematischen Änderungssätze kannst du unter dem folgenden Link nachverfolgen: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52585507

Den Container kannst Du auch als einfachen Punkt neu anlegen, bei dem Namen einer Bushaltestelle wird die Richtung nicht mit angeben, bei Der Feuerwehr fehlte noch ein amenity=fire_station. Das neue Luftbild von Bing hat derzeit einen Versatz, so dass großflächige Verschiebungen nicht sinnvoll sind. Vergleiche mit anderen Luftbildern, insbesondere DigitalGlobe Standard, sind hilfreich.

Technisch wäre ein Wiederherstellen und gezieltes Hochladen einzelner Objekte mit JOSM (Reverter-Plugin) möglich, aber bei den wenigen Objekten geht das neu von Hand schneller und ist sicherer.

Weitere Informationen findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
eggie (2017-10-02 18:50:25+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd.
Geen adressen op gebouwen zetten. Die zitten al op de adresnode. Svp ook geen adressen zelf maken op nodes. Even zoeken naar de adresnode.
GHelieve geen BAG adresnodes te veranderen. Die kadaster BAG nodeszijn er echt.
eggie (2017-10-02 18:59:25+00:00): De tag van het gemeentehuis staat al op de kaart. Graag weghalen. Die eetgelegenheid graag op de adresnode taggen.
De adresnodes bij het station zijn allemaal verdwenen. Zal een BAG update aanvragen.
Het adres dat je hebt veranderd graag weer terugzetten. Die node moet toch ergen in de buurt liggen. Probeer ook niet te veel edits in één changeset te zetten. Het is ook beter over te schkelen naar een volwassen editor. mapsme is niet zo geschikt.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
eggie (2017-10-02 18:47:15+00:00): Dan dus motor_vehicle=no   (Er van uitgaande dat motorvoertuigen verboden zij)
Staat er echt geen wit bord met rode rand, want dan is het access=no
(en niet permissive... Dat is voor eigen weg en routeert gewoon.)
oneway:bicycle=no (dan mogen fietsers tegen het verkeer in)
Mits je oneway=yes erbij zet. 

... en hoe zit met met mofa en moped? :)
Mooi oefenproject.
user_5359 (2017-10-02 18:28:39+00:00): Sorry: I forgot to save the deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5143044867 (no tag and useless changeset comment)
indigomc (2018-02-20 18:14:28+00:00): Please  follow guidelines when classifying roads. Thanks.
borishag (2017-10-04 10:12:51+00:00): Hallo Mapper,

Warom heb je de geolocatie veranderd van de node van Trekpleister?
B Hageman, Editor AS Watson stores
chachafish (2017-10-09 17:18:20+00:00): Hello, Inked, thank you for your contributions to the map. I noticed with a number of your edits you have deleted work others have done and replaced it with your own. That's not quite the way to do things. If you need to change previous work, you can change it, but not delete it. In this case you could have simply changed the sidewalk into a cycleway. Here's something you may want to read: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
user_5359 (2017-10-03 06:52:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.

If you need help: You are welcome!
user_5359 (2017-10-03 06:51:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Water#Drainage following the links.
Nakaner (2017-11-11 20:11:59+00:00): Hallo Halbtax,

danke für deine Aktualisierung in Wankdorf. Leider hast du beim Taggen der Gleise mit railway=construction nicht an die Routenrelationen gedacht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529536954 wird von zahlreichen Routenrelationen genutzt, die jetzt über ein in Bau befindliches Gleis führen und dadurch in valide sind. http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=7.46570&lat=46.96662&zoom=18&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes

Könntest du das bitte berücksichtigen? Danke.

Mir ist es aufgefallen, weil die ICE-Linie Interlaken Ost–Kiel jetzt quer durch Deutschland als schwarze Linie gerender wird.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Halbtax (2017-11-28 19:15:09+00:00): Danke für deinen Hinweis. Ich habe die Relationen nun von den nicht-benutzbaren Gleisen entfernt. 
Leider bin ich zurzeit nicht in der Lage zu erruieren, wie die betreffenden Linien aktuell und ab kommenden Fahrplanwechsel geführt werden. Dementspprechend haben die Relationen jetzt eine Lücke. Es ist eben wesentlich einfacher den baulichen Fortschritt  zu beobachten als den Fahrweg für jede dieser Linien herauszufinden. 
Gruss
Kiekin (2018-02-07 12:22:56+00:00): Quad-Safari-Usedom soll ein Museum sein?
OpenOrbit (2018-02-09 14:13:15+00:00): Nein wie sie unschwer erkennen, es ist kein Museum. Es war kein passendes Motiv vorhanden, um die Örtlichkeit entsprechend zu markieren. Es soll nur gefunden auf der Karte gefunden werden, was bislang seinen Zweck erfüllt. 
#Button gerne abändern#
Constable (2017-10-03 16:49:05+00:00): Hi, I'm writing you about this service road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529543233
Are you sure there are two separate lanes going from via Stabilini to the parking lot? According to what I can see on the satellite imagery it looks to me like just one road, two cars wide, that goes into the parking, but there's nothing separating those two lanes. I'd then map it as a single way, without the oneway tag but with the lanes=2 tag
What do you think?
Thanks
KrK (2017-10-03 18:28:44+00:00): Hi,
you're right, there's no physical barrier between the lanes, only arrows painted on the street. Feel free to change it.
BR
Constable (2017-10-04 06:44:46+00:00): perfect, thanks for your super quick answer!
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 08:38:14+00:00): `Mapillary` should be lowercase
`mapillary`
mavl (2017-10-03 16:31:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок заменяет одно название микрорайона на другое, а также удаляет тег addr:place. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
user_5359 (2017-10-03 06:48:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please verify the changed description of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5143754134
eggie (2017-10-03 07:29:25+00:00): Volgens mij heb je nooit een officieel welkom ontvangen. Bij deze per PB.
Let wel op dat je geen landuse aan de wegen plakt. Het zuidelijke bos bv zit geplakt aan het pad. Dat kan problemen geven bij verschuivingen. Maak je het zelf los? De G-toets in JOSM...
BlackstoneI (2017-10-03 07:41:38+00:00): Je had mij in mei al een keer verwelkomt. Ik ben er van bewust dat het onhandig is meerdere landuse de zelfde node te laten gebruiken. Daarnaast gebruik ik ook al JOSM. Ik zal kijken of ik het op kan lossen. Echter zit er in dit gebied nou eenmaal heel veel aan elkaar geplakt.