piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2018-12-23 09:34:52+00:00): Hola Benito,
my best compliments for the complexity of this construction. For my point of view it is not maintainable. Can you take over an approach to fix all the errors this construct has collected meanwhile:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-65.09188&lat=-16.53829&zoom=12

I recommend to make it simpler and maintainable as well at the same time.
Saludos
Guido
habi (2019-01-28 15:00:46+00:00): Why did you add yourself twice to OSM?
habi (2020-07-27 14:46:43+00:00): I merged both nodes together in Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88571891
Additionally, I added the Meyrin branch, too.
Happy lasering.
praeteritum (2023-01-01 04:06:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130737469.
praeteritum (2023-01-01 03:56:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130737423.
praeteritum (2022-12-31 21:10:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130733508.
Stereo_repair (2018-06-05 16:52:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59574943 where the changeset comment is: Merci de communiquer avec la communauté et de respecter le consensus actuel de tagging des transports publics. Ne pas mettre l'opérateur et la ligne dans le nom de l'arrêt.
praeteritum (2022-12-30 04:45:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130670821.
praeteritum (2022-12-30 04:42:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130670758.
GOwin (2018-05-31 08:09:39+00:00): Thank you for the information about street names.


When you have a few minutes to spare, try the browser-based editor called iD, to edit the map of your community. You may find it quicker and easier if you need to update a lot of information on the map.
Gerald Gomez (2018-05-31 10:56:52+00:00): ur welcome, sir! :)
i will see ur suggestion sir!
4004 (2018-05-31 18:58:55+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
вместо него другой магазин? если нет, надо снести точку
GilB (2018-09-10 19:54:33+00:00): Bonjour. 
J'ai supprimé vos modifications sur le nom des bâtiments parce que ce n'est pas la vocation d'OpenStreetMap de contenir ce type de données. Il s'agit d'informations privées.
Je pense qu'il s'agit d'une erreur. Ce n'est pas grave, j'ai corrigé.
Ce serait également de mieux de nommer vos modifications de manière plus explicite. Même si j'apprécie votre sympathie, ce sera mieux de préciser "Ajout Bar rue machin à Angers" ou quelque chose de ce genre.
Vous pourrez trouver beaucoup d'informations sur l'édition dans OSM dans les sites suivants :
https://learnosm.org/fr/
http://www.openstreetmap.fr/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
Et il y a probablement des contributeurs sur Angers, n'hésitez pas à les contacter.
(moi je suis juste de passage)
Merci en tout cas de contribuer à l'amélioration de la carte.
praeteritum (2022-12-29 05:42:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130627921.
praeteritum (2022-12-29 05:38:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130627882.
yumean1119 (2018-06-01 06:08:45+00:00): Thank you! I have moved some ferry routes to reflect the abolishment of Utaka Kokudo Ferry and might have caused problems. Your edits are so marvelous!
praeteritum (2022-12-28 07:35:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130586264.
GilB (2018-09-10 20:10:41+00:00): Bonjour. J'ai modifié votre contribution.
Il est préférable de créer un point pour indiquer un bar plutôt que le bâtiment entier.
C'est plus logique (tout le bâtiment n'est pas un bar) et plus simple à éditer ensuite.
4004 (2018-05-31 20:04:35+00:00): адрес на точки в здании можно не ставить (тем более если неправильно - улица и номера дома идут в разные поля)
eggie (2018-05-30 14:28:00+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo.. Een parking kun je trouwens ook als vlak mappen.
Probeer wel concreet aan te geven wat je doet. Kleine aanpassingen zegt niemand iets. Dus: "aanvullende tags parking toegevoegd" oid.
PT-53 (2018-05-30 15:54:43+00:00): Hallo OSM-Gang,
bei Deinen Eingaben hast Du leider - wohl versehentlich - eine Relation für eine Abbiegebeschränkung beschädigt. Ich habe daher Deine Eingaben / Änderungen zurückgesetzt.
Bitte beachte auch bei neuen Eingaben, daß Radarfallen keinen Namen haben.

Grüße und Willkommen bei OSM
PT-53 (2018-05-31 05:52:08+00:00): PS:
Wie man Blitzer richtig einträgt, kannst Du hier nachlesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
und
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:enforcement
Grüße
GilB (2018-09-10 20:17:47+00:00): Bonjour. J'ai corrigé votre contribution. 
Si vous voulez que les informations apparaissent sur la carte, il faut respecter la formulation des tags (ou chercher avec l'assistant de l'éditeur iD). 
Ici c'est amenity=bar. On peut indiquer des précisions avec le tag Description comme je l'ai fait.
Et si vous souhaitez savoir comment tagger les bars, consultez le wiki : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dbar
Maintenant le bar apparait sur la carte ;-)

Il est également préférable de créer un point plutôt qu'utiliser le point déjà défini pour l'adresse (pour simplifier les modifications ensuite).
eggie (2018-05-30 14:35:44+00:00): review: Dag JNijholt.. Probeer plakken te voorkomen van paden aan de landuse (grass) 
Tip; linker Alt toets vasthouden en ID plakt niet :)
Wanneer een pad een andere weg kruist dan alstijd een verbindingsnode maken anders kun je niet afslaan. Dat zou je nog kunnen doen. Verder de paden losmaken van de landuse. Eén pad overlapt het al bestaande pad een stukje. Je bent niet aan het eind verder gegaan. 
Kijk je nog even naar je edits?
Dit was je edit:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59400434
eggie (2018-05-30 17:28:35+00:00): Ik heb wat hersteld bij de paden in je wijk. Enkele heb ik losgemaakt van de gebouwen. De parallelvoetpaden (trottoirs) worden niet gemapt in OSM, want kunt overal zo de straat op stappen.
Wel kun je evt. op de hoofdrijbaan aangeven dat er trottoirs aan weerszijden zijn.
Verbindingen met andere wegen heb ik aangebracht. Toch graag een reactie dat je er nota van hebt genomen.
MVG,
Eggie
EricEukleide9 (2018-05-31 12:23:03+00:00): Ik heb er nota van genomen. Wel zie ik dat je een aantal paden hebt verwijderd, bijvoorbeeld bij het parkje, die er wel zijn. Ik zal dat met Alt even proberen. Bedankt voor je uitgebreide reactie.
eggie (2018-05-31 13:24:12+00:00): Oke... Hier kun je zien wat ik gedaan heb. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59405114
De paden bij het parkje zijn er nog steeds volgens mij. Het bos heb ik losgemaakt en wat opgeschoven. De parallelpaden heb ik wel verwijderd. Die mappen we niet.
eggie (2018-05-31 13:26:37+00:00): Even gekeken..De paden lijken weg, maar dat komt door de trage rendering. beetje in- en uitzoomen. ... of F5 wil ook wel eens helpen. :)
Bedankt voor je reactie..
zors1843 (2018-05-30 16:34:32+00:00): Komt niet overeen met de omschrijving van park in de wiki.
zors1843 (2018-05-30 16:33:31+00:00): Park Ophoven staat als node op private grond ?
Graag ook wiki over parken bekijken !
zors1843 (2018-05-30 16:31:09+00:00): Het gebouw heb je vervangen door een park.  Is dit correct ?
zors1843 (2018-05-30 16:30:02+00:00): De "school Ophoven" is bovenop de sporthal gemapt.  Bovendien komt de omtrek niet overeen met het gebouw.
Graag nazicht
l3BAM (2018-07-12 13:42:09+00:00): La voie tramway est encore en construction. 
railway=construction était plus adapté surtout que la mise en service est lointaine.
Pourquoi l'avez-vous enlevé ?
pitscheplatsch (2018-05-30 19:45:44+00:00): #test #failed
pitscheplatsch (2018-05-30 19:45:50+00:00): #test #failed
Alecs01 (2018-06-12 18:24:35+00:00): Ciao, non è un può esagerato place=town per Boccioleto?
popilen (2018-06-12 18:32:41+00:00): Ciao Alecs01, grazie per il commento, concordo, town è esagerato.
Il fatto è che prima il nome Boccioleto non compariva, sopraffatto da altri nomi minori vicini, così ho forzato per farlo apparire.
Ora lo ridimensiono, e vediamo se va a posto ...
popilen (2018-06-12 19:08:29+00:00): Fatto, l'ho riportato a "village".
Nei prossimi giorni, a sistema assestato, guarderò se appare nel giusto modo ...
Alecs01 (2018-06-12 19:43:18+00:00): Grazie della risposta, tieni sempre conto del principio "non si mappa per il rendering" :) ciao!
abakus_uploader (2018-05-30 22:30:53+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
praeteritum (2022-12-28 07:35:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130586237.
elotrojames (2019-06-02 17:04:09+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios de añadieron varios casinos. Soy de la zona de alajuela donde aparecen varios pero en el lugar no existen. ¿de dónde salen estos datos?
viloan (2018-05-30 14:35:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-07-15 13:50:32+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1455370 ?
praeteritum (2022-12-27 03:36:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130537951.
lakedistrict (2018-05-30 15:57:56+00:00): That would be because you've also edited the Morecambe Road/Owen Road junction in Lancaster in the same changeset, which is part of a load of other bus relations. You can visualise your changeset here: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59401119. Have a look at one of the Lancaster bus route relations to see what other tags you can add to the 881 relation.
skifans (2018-05-31 12:38:43+00:00): Ahh, is it where I have split the road which had caused them. That makes sense.

About the other tags, do you feel that this should be duplicated and have to/from tags added? If so is there an easier way rather then clicking through all of the roads again?
lakedistrict (2018-05-31 13:04:04+00:00): To add the other tags (for one direction) you just need to edit the tags on the relation - you won't need to click on every road again. Just zoom into any road section, click edit, click the road, scroll down to and click All Relations Bus Route Malham Tarn Shuttle, then add extra tags. Normally there would also be a route relation for the opposite direction and a route_master relation holding them together (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:route=bus and https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Relation:route) - this is fairly complex though and doing this in iD for such a long route would probably take ages. There are a few bugs in iD at the moment which make editing bus routes complicated, so feel free to leave the route relation as it stands if you like. :) Maybe send Lancaster mapper https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/John-O a message if you need any help.
hvzsr (2018-05-30 18:59:14+00:00): I got the comment wrong - it ought to instead say 'added buildings'
praeteritum (2022-12-27 03:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130537918.
abakus_uploader (2018-05-30 22:30:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
praeteritum (2022-12-27 03:33:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130537894.
praeteritum (2022-12-27 03:32:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130537885.
Rich1234 (2018-05-31 01:20:16+00:00): The nodes deleted from the townhouse buildings on Cameron Station Boulevard held address data for the individual units.  Mapper is new, so message sent asking them to undo what appears to be accidental deletion of map data.
FiftyNiner (2018-05-31 12:21:13+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. And apologies for the unintended changes. The reason I removed them was that there does not seem to be any other instance of that convention for associating address data that I have come across, nor have I seen that method described anywhere. I cannot seem to figure out the proper method for rolling back a change set. Can you provide some guidance or make the revision of this edit and the other one you commented too. Thank you.
freebeer (2018-05-31 12:45:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59428776 where the changeset comment is: Simple full revert by user request, address nodes deleted by mistake.  Loses two additional changes seen in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59401756 .  I will take a look at the second changeset and probably should have used Potlatch 1 here.
Rich1234 (2018-05-31 14:20:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM.  No worries, this is all part of the learning process.

> The reason I removed them was that there does not seem to be any other instance of that convention for associating address data that I have come across, nor have I seen that method described anywhere.

There are actually lots of instances of this convention in OSM, which just means you have not come across them just yet.  But they are there.

As for the description of this usage, see this OSM wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses

Note the list under the title "How to map addresses".  The nodes that you accidentally deleted where using the third bullet point method "nodes that are parts of building polygons" to represent the addresses of the units.

A better "fix" if you wanted to make one for these would have been to have replaced the single large building polygon with multiple, adjacent, building polygons each representing one unit, then move the address point tags onto those new building polygons.  Doing this replacement, however, is significantly easier in JOSM with the building or terrace plugin and the "Replace Geometry" tool from the utilsplugin2 plugin (this one allows for maintaining a maximum amount of edit history when making these sorts of changes).
FiftyNiner (2018-05-31 14:33:55+00:00): Again. Thanks for the guidance.
freebeer (2018-05-31 20:56:36+00:00): Sorry for forgetting to follow-up until now...
If you haven't seen, the unwanted losses in my revert are not difficult to replicate.
You changed the access of the pool at housenumber 650 to private, plus at 5757 you added a new private pool that I deleted for speed, presently appearing or disappearing by zoomlevel at the lower left of the orange box seen on the map to the right in this changeset discussion.
If it's not trivial for you to repeat that work, I can restore your original changes.
However, as part of the learning process, I would suggest you take the opportunity to use a different background in iD than Bing here, in the hopes one will be clearer or better to re-draw your new pool.  Without actually looking, my gut feeling is Mapbox will be a good choice.
.
As far as iD which I still avoid using, I agree that from those times I have to start it, the points and lines are too prominent and distracting if I want to study the background.
You can try the `w' command for a Wireframe style to make the map data less distracting.
If you want to see another presentation of the neighbourhood node in the car park the way I would see it, and can risk it, the obsolete editor Potlatch presents such a node as probably a green dot, with other functions like address nodes as pale blue, and pointless nodes as grey.
Potlatch also has a Wireframe style in a pull-down menu that I almost prefer, dispensing with the pale coloured lines that can obscure the background, rendering them as simple black, and minimally sized green squares.
There are other styles that differ in subtle ways intended for a particular focus in editing.
Of course there are a lot of deficiencies these days in Potlatch, but I bring it up as an existing alternative to the iD user interface, although probably JOSM can do everything there and more.
.
Anyway, sorry in my hurry to restore the address entrance nodes, that I undid your other work.  If you really want, I can restore those changes, although the additional work to keep your history intact seems not worth the effort if, as I suspect, your second attempt to draw the pool from a different background is far superior to the original.
.
By the way, the iD development occurs in a Github repository which is where an issue can be opened if you can suggest concrete improvements.  Before you get too nvolved with that, note that iD is a frequent culprit in bad edits where nodes get pulled to places they should not be and joined where they should be separate, perhaps in part to the same prominence that led you to delete the nodes as unwanted, misplaced, or whatever, so I would suggest if you intend to keep contributing to OSM as I and all of us hope, that you invest quickly into learning JOSM before investing too much into iD or its improvement.
.
Thanks for your contributions, and do not worry about having made mistakes, gave me something to do while de-scaling the loo as part of me OSM janitorial job.
Rich1234 (2018-05-31 21:22:27+00:00): Further to freebeer's "bing" statement, when I first started mapping, "bing" images were the best there were in ID.  But I've not used the "bing" images now for a very long time, because the "ESRI World Imagery" and "Mapbox Satellite" images in JOSM are of significantly better resolution than the Bing images ever were.  Both may be available in ID now, and if so, compare them to the Bing images (at least here in the NOVA area) and you'll see the quality difference immediately.
abakus_uploader (2018-05-30 22:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2018-07-13 14:33:30+00:00): Poprawiłem.
hvzsr (2018-05-30 18:59:00+00:00): I got the comment wrong - it ought to instead say 'added buildings'
hvzsr (2018-05-30 18:58:49+00:00): I got the comment wrong - it ought to instead say 'added buildings'
praeteritum (2022-12-26 04:45:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130499990.
user_5359 (2018-05-30 18:19:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of oneway=reversible (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#Time_conditional_restrictions). Exists these time conditional restrictions? Please add them.
HCM0031 (2018-05-30 18:56:13+00:00): Thank you!

I apologize, I was needing to update speed limits only- not sure why directional were changed..
user_5359 (2018-05-30 18:58:48+00:00): This value exists from version #4 (more than one year old). But I hope you can verify this value.
HCM0031 (2018-05-30 19:03:14+00:00): The speed limit changed from TxDOT on May 8th. Is this the value you are referring to?
user_5359 (2018-05-30 19:08:39+00:00): No, oneway=reversible.
HCM0031 (2018-05-30 19:32:28+00:00): I still see it as a one way going north but with the updated speed limit to 70. I must be missing something.
HCM0031 (2018-05-30 19:48:49+00:00): But- I cannot confirm the times for these directional changes, unfortunately.
woodpeck (2018-06-04 21:26:27+00:00): Dear Artifactor, please stop adding leisure=park to the Dothan Area Botanical Gardens. If you believe that tagging them as "garden" is wrong, please write a comment here and explain why.
hvzsr (2018-05-30 18:58:38+00:00): I got the comment wrong - it ought to instead say 'added buildings'
Rich1234 (2018-05-31 01:19:03+00:00): Changeset deleted the neighborhood node identifying "Shirlington".  Mapper is new, so message sent requesting they undo what appears to be accidental deletion of map data.
FiftyNiner (2018-05-31 12:30:53+00:00): This is the other edit you pointed out was incorrect. It was not clear to me at all that the point sitting in the middle fo the parking lot labeled Shirlington was a valid point. It seems like such a higher level point should not be visible at such lower levels. But that's probably not something I can have an effect on. It seems to be a bit of a UX issue. I would appreciate if you could use your experience to revert my edits since I have not yet figured out how to do that.   I have learned my lesson about making changes.
freebeer (2018-05-31 12:56:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59429254 where the changeset comment is: Trivial revert.  Welcome 1959er, what I guess you mean is a UX issue should be the editor-shows-all.  I suspect if you view the map with different renderers, it may appear more as you expect.
Rich1234 (2018-05-31 14:13:01+00:00): > It was not clear to me at all that the point sitting in the middle fo the parking lot labeled Shirlington was a valid point. 

Welcome to OSM, and this is all part of the learning process.

Yes, it is partly a UX issue.  ID (the editor you used) shows everything, and the OSM data model is such that "higher level" material is normally represented by tags attached to the basic elements (nodes, ways, and relations).  So for ID, it is always best to check and see what tags are attached to something before deleting it.  If it has a bunch of tags attached, that is an indication that it may have some significance.

With JOSM you can filter your view to hide things you don't wish to see at a given time while mapping.  ID (as of the last time I used it) does not have this feature.  But JOSM has a bit of a steeper learning curve (not too bad, but it is not as trivial to start with as ID).