piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iccaldwell (2015-01-26 20:20:20+00:00): Welcome to open street map.

Did you mean not to connect the path to  Penhill Crescent? It look to me it should be connect and  Penhill Crescent need to be extended and share a node with your path.

Ian
rickmastfan67 (2015-02-24 06:54:26+00:00): I'm sorry, but I'm going to be reverting this changeset.  This is very clearly setup as C/D (collector–distributor) setup here and what you changed to a 'motorway' are truly 'motorway_link' ways.  These aren't mainline lanes, and don't deserve the main tag.  I didn't touch any of your speed limit edits to these ways.  The 'upgrade' has been reverted in Changeset 29060533. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29060533
SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 03:02:11+00:00): If there's a discussion to be had about making this section of the A595 secondary rather than primary (like Oxford High Street) it needs to be made on talk-gb or similar, really.
5m4u9 (2015-01-22 06:56:49+00:00): Hola, buen nivel de edición!

no es útil el nombre repetido de cada árbol de la ciudad, existe el campo "note o  notas" para esto que se sabe que es pero no cómo hacerlo.

Luego, alguien puede sabiendo el genotipo, la especie y follaje corregir de una. 

Gracias por el aporte ;-)
5m4u9 (2015-01-22 07:07:00+00:00): Pienso que editas las paradas de buses para crear y mostrar un mapa de estas... pero hay algunos tips (consejos) que pueden servirte de la experiencia en cochabamba.

Una parada de bus consta de a) el lugar donde para el bus "parada" ej: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3201986224 y b) el lugar donde espera el psajero o "plataforma". ej: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3201986225. En OSM ambos forman un punto de parada y en el ejemplo sería es https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4220719

Cada "punto de parada" puede estar  añadida en la ruta de cada bus y formará la parada de bus. 

Para no aburrir lo que se puede hacer es esto: http://www.öpnvkarte.de/?lon=-66.19143&lat=-17.37543&zoom=13&layers=TBTTT
MikeN (2015-01-22 13:04:55+00:00): Hi, The Rock River was set to landuse=industrial, which doesn't seem to apply to the entire river?
HubMiner (2015-01-22 23:08:52+00:00): Thank you for catching this, reverted back to "riverbank".
HubMiner (2015-01-22 23:14:19+00:00): And fixed again: changed to "river".
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-14 16:41:36+00:00): Está utilizando la etiqueta incorrecta, este tipo de etiqueta es highway=milestone. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3303589240
CloCkWeRX (2016-11-19 09:45:17+00:00): I don't see much GPS activity for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323574984 ; do you know if its accurate? Do you have any more information on the construction?
ToniE (2015-01-22 13:05:45+00:00): Hallo Carina09 und herzlich willkomen bei OSM.

Dein erster Eintrag wird komplett wenn Du noch

shop=books

hinzufügst.

Mehr dazu unter

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dbooks

Viele Grüße und noch viel Spaß bei OSM,
Toni

N.B. "buch&töne=Buchandlung buch&töne" ist nicht notwendig.
Math1985 (2015-01-22 09:58:43+00:00): Bedankt, goed werk!
Eberth (2015-01-22 16:36:49+00:00): Hallo wiedergaenger,

ist die von Dir eingezeichnete Verbindungsstraße (highway=residential) zwischen Kastanienweg und Lindenstraße nicht ein Fußweg (highway=path)?

Thomas
kerosin (2015-01-22 20:25:54+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis - habe es korrigiert. Ist natürlich ein highway=path
UIMA (2015-01-22 12:10:01+00:00): Telefonnummer und Öffnungszeiten hinzugefügt
UIMA (2015-01-22 12:14:36+00:00): Autohändler und  Restaurant
SomeoneElse (2015-02-05 19:01:58+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323621785 has a name and address, but no other sort of tag to help the rendering software that creates maps to say what it is.  The part of it's that's building could have a "building" tag added - from the imagery it looks like there's also a service road into it to be mapped too.

Hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.
Raluca Puichilita (2015-02-20 13:50:01+00:00): Thanks for pointing it out! It's been taken care of as of now :-)
kartler175 (2015-06-06 08:42:17+00:00): JOSM meldet doch solche Fehler beim Hochladen?
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch60=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=49.11802&lon=12.29728&zoom=15&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C70

bitte vervollständigen.
KatharinaKot (2015-01-22 12:21:30+00:00): neues Wohnhaus
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-01-09 13:36:36+00:00): Moin highpotential,

die Änderung ist schon älter, aber was soll der folgende Knoten mit step=yes sein?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3304056436

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
aceman444 (2015-01-22 20:46:20+00:00): Nie su tu teraz parkoviska 2 na sebe? Mne kresli v zltej oblasti dve P-cka. Ak niekto zakreslil parkovisko ako oblast, tak uz nemusite davat parkovisko ako bod. Aha, ved aj tu oblast ste zakreslili Vy :) Vsetky tie nove znacky (ako fee a operator) dajte rovno na tu oblast.
*Martin* (2015-01-22 16:37:10+00:00): Ahoj Toliman

Prosim uvadzaj zdroj udajov a popisy ku tvojim changesetom.

Dakujem.
Durko_freemap (2015-01-23 14:04:59+00:00): Ahoj, prosim Ta zosulad nazvy ulic, tu si opravil na Mudroňa, ale v smere na ulicu československej armády je ešte nazov Murdoňa. Ktory nazov je spravny? dik
Veszett Roka (2015-01-22 14:57:07+00:00): corrected the traffic direction (one way street) of Posa Lajos utca, Budapest
gileri (2015-01-23 13:03:01+00:00): Je viens de passer devant les arrêts de tram et bus du palais de justice, et je confirme que les arrêts sont nommés de la sorte :

Palais de Justice - Mairie du 3ème

De plus dans OSM il faut éviter au plus possible les abréviations, donc la forme '3ème' prends le pas sur '3e'.

Si vous souhaitez le corriger vous-même allez-y, sinon je le ferais ce WE.
b_mortgat (2015-01-23 15:05:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Sur le plan du réseau TCL lignes fortes que l'on peut trouver à l'adresse http://www.tcl.fr/Me-deplacer/Plans-du-reseau les arrêts « Palais de Justice - Mairie du 3e » et « Bachut - Mairie du 8e » sont ainsi nommés ainsi que sur les autres plans du réseau « officiels ».

Les noms des arrêts ont été probablement revus lors du passage à la nouvelle signalétique. Il est vrai que les noms apposés aux arrêts eux-mêmes n'ont pas été nécessairement corrigés. 

On peut néanmoins rappeler que la règle d'abréviation des ordinaux en français est : 
* 1er / 1re
* 2e, 3e, 4e, et ainsi de suite
Les graphies 1ère, 2ème, etc. sont incorrectes. Voir http://www.langue-fr.net/spip.php?article239 à ce sujet.
Shoden (2015-01-22 15:59:37+00:00): Deleted non-existent western section of road.  The remaining section that connects to NW 1771st Road is a private road that dead ends at the top of the hill.
Rogehm (2015-04-04 06:57:58+00:00): Sorry, hier ist kein Krankenhaus, nur ein Ärztehaus. amenity geändert auf auf doctors
SK53 (2015-01-29 23:44:17+00:00): Please dont use landuse=industrial for oil fields! This is not what the tag is intended for. Only use this for discrete installations within the area (see the example I have mapped just outside Esperanza, Santa Cruz).
Colin Smale (2015-04-13 11:21:00+00:00): should this still be part of the Ireland relation? according to wikipedia "With effect from 31 March 2014, the UK and Ireland published EEZ limits which resolved any disputes over the ownership of the islet"
Govanus (2015-04-15 19:38:46+00:00): The United Nations has the following deposit:-
http://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/IRL_2014_Order86.pdf 
I think that may go south of the Rockall site.
I think that Ireland was not so intreasted in the land than the waters around for future mining.  I think the UK had the strongest claim on the land but other places in the old Viking empire wanted in on any oil or gas, so it became under debate for some years but if the eez in this submission goes south then take the claim off on OSM.
I find OSM stuggles with sea boundries a lot {look at gibralter vs spain} probably as its increasingly global wiki system and if boundries on land can sometimes be disputed boundries in the sea are even more so poorly universaly recognised until the treaties get signed.
Another confusion is that EEZ's and the newest international law of the sea are still only several decades inforce so old notions are still being tested by conflicting ones.
Eventually most places with overlaps will have signed demarcation treties like the one worked out in the north sea, so people can be comfortable.  The south china sea might sea it dealt with by war though first.

So if you find the lines in the above miss it change it.  I'd just left n the quandry as I'd not found a good enough answer at the time from the UK's foriegn office website.
Colin Smale (2015-04-15 20:01:44+00:00): that document shows that Ireland does not put Rockall within its EEZ. Rockall is 57+N and the northernmost point in the Irish act is 56+N so Rockall cannot be covered. Do you agree that it can be taken out of the Ireland relation now?
Govanus (2015-04-16 14:16:57+00:00): I read your confirmation after making the change last night.  I'm looking at adding the council boundries to it.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-05 18:44:39+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

What actually is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323676422 ?  Is it a field boundary, or something within the field?
Graf Westerholt (2017-02-05 06:52:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7831657 Bei Parkhäusen trägt man nicht building=yes ein. building=yes ist ja unspezifiziert. Spezifiziert wäre es building=multi-storey, was aber schon über parking=multi-storey angegeben ist. Also daher kein building=yes. Steht auch nicht im Wiki, dass dabei building=yes angegeben wird. Karten wie Mapnik oder OsmAnd zeigen bei building=yes dann keinen Parkplatz an.

Ich habe es korrigiert.
pyrog (2022-04-26 09:00:25+00:00): Bonjour,

La syntaxe opening_hours:* utilisée dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323689094 n'est pas correcte.

Il faut utiliser opening_hour=Mo-Fr pour indiquer que c'est ouvert en semaine, ou mieux, indiquer les horaires du matin et de l'après midi.

Par exemple :
opening_hour=Mo-Fr 08:00-12:00, 14:00-18:00

Cordialement,

Yves
chillly (2015-01-27 12:36:50+00:00): The document you quote has no licence info in it, so that means it is copyright. Do you have a licence or written agreement to use this data?
M!dgard (2015-01-22 21:56:32+00:00): *source=survey 2015-01-22; Bing
:p
aceman444 (2016-07-02 21:01:09+00:00): Zdravim, preco ste vymazali cislo cesty (ref) na way 47474416 (k zel. zast. Ladice)? Ta cesta je dodnes vedena ako cesta 3. triedy s cislom 1616. To ze podla vas je nehodna sa volat cestou tretej triedy, ale len 'service', je jedna vec, ale to cislo nebol asi dovod mazat.
Draktor (2016-07-03 12:15:06+00:00): Stalo sa to nedopatrením. Ďakujem za upozornenie. Cesta je v celej dlze uz spravne oznacena.
aceman444 (2016-07-03 14:59:53+00:00): Dobre, som rad, ze len nedopatrenim. Ale ja som to potom opravil (nechal som service, ale pridal ssc:class co pouzivam ak naozaj cesta nedosahuje prislusne kvality, len je tak oznacena), vratil naspat to ref. Ale to cislo malo byt len na tom kratkom useku ako som to urobil, nie po celej dlzke az k budove. Ano, je to patologicky pripad, cela cesta III/1616 ma mat len 70 metrov a konci "v poli". Po Vasej uprave to zase nie je dobre. Mozem to teda vratit spat, len ak ste tam boli (survey) ci nahodou tu cestu nevylepsili a uz mozeme dat highway=tertiary namiesto service.
Draktor (2016-07-03 15:55:01+00:00): Ok, vratte to späť. Bol som tam nedávno a tá cesta je stále v pôvodnom stave ako pred rokmi.
robert (2015-03-05 01:55:12+00:00): Are you sure about this edit? It disagrees with Ordnance Survey Locator which thinks it's called Tun Lane only south of the bend: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=810890
"Westoff Lane" has now disappeared.
ChehrehBargi (2019-08-20 19:23:37+00:00): جناب عزیزقناد؛ دایره گردش برای انتهای کوچه‌ها پیش بینی نشده است. جهت نمایش میدان های کوچک می باشد.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-05 18:57:33+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3304949376 with a "name" tag but for anything to understand what it actually is in the map data you'll need to add some other sort of tag too - such as "building".  Also, if the name isn't really "Stone Cottage built 1861" (but that's just a description of what it is) you don't need to make up a name for OSM.
saintam1 (2015-01-23 11:09:43+00:00): I'm surprised by this -- according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#admin_level (if you scroll down to "Bulgaria"), admin_level=2 is for national borders. We had a lengthy discussion about admin_levels recently on the Bulgarian forum (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=462119) and Sofia was set to admin_level=8 deliberately.

But maybe we're missing something. Where does the rule come from that capitals have to be admin_level=2? It's kind of odd since it's clearly a smaller entity than provinces, which in Bulgaria are admin_level=6.
lucadelu (2015-01-23 11:21:04+00:00): I tried to unify all the national capitals of the World. Most of them (about 180 capitals) had admin_level=2 because the city is primary the capital of National Borders and after most of the times also the capital of Region and Municipality.

If the Bulgarian community think that admin_level = 8 is the right solution please revert my changeset, but I hope that you can understand my purpose.

Regards
Luca
saintam1 (2015-01-23 12:16:50+00:00): But the capital itself is not part of the national borders? Oh, I'm confused by all this. You're probably right. I'll leave it at admin_level=2, and we'll need to discuss it some more on the BG forum I think.
lucadelu (2015-01-23 13:01:11+00:00): Yes, but it should also be part of borders with admin_level=8
Polyglot (2015-01-24 18:11:59+00:00): Hoi,
Zou je er iets aan hebben als ik een filmpje maak van hoe ik deze route zou omzetten naar 'versie 2'? (gewoon op basis van de informatie die in deze relatie aanwezig is, zonder terug te vallen op data van Connexxion)
Polyglot
trigpoint (2015-01-26 15:34:32+00:00): Please can you confirm that this is a verifiable business, i.e. if I walk along Tyn Y Maes will a see a signs saying Wicanspirit Designs. Your website has neither a phone number or address which make this look like a 'work from home' business'. OSM is not a business directory but a database of observable/verifiable facts.
naoliv (2015-02-04 19:00:42+00:00): lucadelu, what exactly is the purpose to include an admin_level on the city node?
Brasilia is part of 3 relations, all of them with a proper admin_level (2, 4 and 8).
Is there any specific software that doesn't understand this info from the relations?
lucadelu (2015-02-05 07:42:53+00:00): Hi naoliv, I added it because I try to obtain the capitals all over the world and most of them (about 180) had admin_level=2, so I decided to add it also to the missing one. This tag could be really useful for people with my same request.
I know that relations should solve this problem, but query the relations all over the world is quite complicate.
If you think that my change was wrong please revert it, but in this way our database will be less solid than now.

Regards
Luca
SomeoneElse (2015-02-05 17:08:23+00:00): Wouldn't a more robust approach be to look for the admin centre of the country relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/59470 ?  If you're relying on capital=yes on a node, I suspect that you might get false positives.

Actually - it's probably worth asking on the help site what current "best practice" is.
lucadelu (2015-02-06 09:35:20+00:00): Yes it should be better to check in the country relation, but if you have to query all the countries in the world could be really a hard and long work.
I checked my commits and I added 24 missing admin_level=2 for country capital. The countries should be around 193 so for my point of view the "best practice" is to add admin_level=2 to country capitals.

my2cents
Luca
naoliv (2015-02-06 10:30:57+00:00): Note that "best practice" != "easier path" :-)
The problem is that it's adding a duplicated information.
Also, if somebody looks directly at this node they will only see an incomplete admin_level representation (2, while it's also 4 and 8).
All the major applications/tools support relations.
You should be able to do something about this with overpass or another query tool.
For example: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/7wq (it needs to be refined to only return the admin_centre nodes, however)
lucadelu (2015-02-06 10:42:11+00:00): Thanks for you example of overpass-turbo but it doesn't work because it is returning also the node of label (also this is a duplicate information ;-) )
SomeoneElse (2015-02-06 10:48:03+00:00): A general comment - if you're extracting data from somewhere where data is continually being added and deleted, and you need to change the way that it's labelled to support the way that you're extracting it, you're probably Doing It Wrong.  The problem with that approach is that people will not see the benefit of the extra labels that you're adding, and will not add them to new things that would otherwise qualify, and will remove them from old things.  Hence my suggestion to ask at the help site for best practice.
naoliv (2015-02-06 11:20:16+00:00): label isn't duplicated. It could be an unwanted object/data for your case, but it's not duplicated.
Anyway, your query with only admin_centre: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/7wt
Next time you could try the help site, lime SomeoneElse said or wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL
Adding admin_level=2 to the node really isn't the solution.
carciofo (2015-09-18 09:34:03+00:00): Hola Iván, la etiqueta highway=motorway no aplica a vías en Colombia (véase http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia#Etiquetas_de_rutas_en_Colombia). Estas vías tienen una definición específica restringida en OSM y bajo esa definición este tipo de vías no existen en Colombia (aún si se les llama coloquialmente "autopistas"). Por favor edite la prioridad de las vías con etiqueta highway=motorway de acuerdo a los criterios de red vial primaria, secundaria o terciaria según sea el caso. 
Cordial saludo.
emacsen (2015-01-23 14:04:58+00:00): What's the source for this changeset? Looking at some of the objects, like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71918123 it says it's an abandoned bridge, but I can't see an abandoned bridge in the bing imagery.
RussNelson (2015-01-30 06:50:59+00:00): That's why the bridge is marked "abandoned", not "dismantled". The bridge has been removed, but if you go there, you'll see that the abutments are still in place.
RussNelson (2015-01-30 06:54:05+00:00): Oh, and to help you understand these changesets marked "railroad crossings", I am going through a list of NY crossings that I downloaded from the FRA website, one by one.  There are 12K crossings and I'm on crossing 9000. Many of them are disused private crossings, which I am ignoring.
emacsen (2015-01-30 12:10:29+00:00): You might want to add that to the source for the changesets- right now it just says bing.
RussNelson (2015-01-30 13:52:49+00:00): It's only a "source" in the hearsay sense. No intellectual property is being copied.
5m4u9 (2015-01-23 06:33:13+00:00): Es sencillo, opening_hours=24/7 (todo el día) o Mo-Fr 08:00-12:00,14:30-18:30 (horario oficina) o Sa 19:00+ (19 en adelante) ....existe también service
ianlopez1115 (2015-02-01 14:49:31+00:00): As much as possible, please do not delete nodes tagged with entrance=main, as it is used locate the exact or approximate main access points of buildings, etc. Not only that, do not add redundant details (like what happened to the St. Peter's College Seminary edits)
Nakaner (2015-01-27 20:25:48+00:00): Wenn der Weg physikalisch vor Ort existiert, ist das kein Grund, ihm highway=* wegzunehmen. Warst du vor Ort oder schreibst du nur (legalerweise) aus einer Verordnung ab?
Nakaner (2015-01-27 20:27:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323763933
Nakaner (2015-02-02 13:00:41+00:00): Mangels Reaktion werde ich in Kürze die Wege wiederherstellen und sehe mich genötigt, diesen Changeset als Vandalismus einzustufen.
Wychuchol (2015-02-03 08:45:35+00:00): Der Weg existiert zwar, soll aber nach Idee des Biosphärengebiets wieder in den ursprünglichen Waldzustand versetzt werden. Daher ist abandoned hier angemessen. Infomier dich mal über das Biosphärengebiet...
Nakaner (2015-02-03 19:31:09+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=29936
GUFSZ (2015-02-16 13:23:38+00:00): Wie ist es eigentlich zu sehen, dass Infomaterial über das Biosphärengebiet eingearbeitet wird. Verstößt das unter Umständen nicht gegen die selbstauferlegten Quellennutzungsbeschränkungungen von OSM.
Nakaner (2015-02-16 14:18:52+00:00): Texte von Verordnung sind gemeinfrei. Karten von Verordnungen sind gemeinfrei, wenn im Text erwähnt wird, dass die "Karte Bestandteil der Verordnung ist". Dennoch sollte nicht einfach ein Weg gelöscht oder mit abandoned:highway=* getaggt werden, bloß weil irgendeine Verordnung ihn als "aufgegeben" brandmarkt. Solange er existiert, bleibt er in OSM. We map what's on the ground.
Владимир К (2018-11-05 16:30:16+00:00): )))))))0)0)))000
ваши названия со смайликами вы сами придумали?
rab (2015-01-23 23:28:46+00:00): Hallo,
hast du etwa ein no_right_turn in die Hubertstraße gemeint?
http://map.comlu.com/?zoom=16&lat=51.46593&lon=7.07519&layer=Mapquest%20Open&overlays=FTT
Diese Beschränkung ist allerdings schon doppelt vorhanden. Josm könnte dir da mit dem eingebauten Validator weiterhelfen.
tunnelbauer (2015-01-23 10:58:22+00:00): Hallo,
ich glaube nicht, dass der Hundeabrichteplatz ein leisure=sports_centre Tagging verdient... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre
MikeN (2015-01-23 12:24:05+00:00): Hi, Thank you for the edit.  Please clarify why ways were removed from the trail relation, and what is meant by removing trail highlighting.
Ryan112233 (2015-01-23 13:31:14+00:00): Hello.  Thank you for your message.  I thought taking away the highlighting of Jones Gap and Rainbow Falls trails would better serve to conformity of the rest of the trails in the Mountain Bridge trail system (as none others are highlighted).  If you disagree then my apologies.  I certainly do not mean to step on any toes here.
MikeN (2015-01-24 03:09:59+00:00): Hi - I like your idea to make the trails in the Mountain Bridge trail system look more similar.   Some trails are set as highway=path (dashed line) and others as highway=footway(dotted line).  Bicycle permissions are set separately, so either path or footway could be used.   The Hiking documentation on the OpenStreetMap Wiki tends to favor path, but some editors have different presets.
  In OpenStreetMap, trails are split to show features such as slope, hiking SAC Scale rating, and bridges. relations are used to identify all segments as part of a single named trail.   Those features can then be automatically highlighted on a map.  Having a relation can also show trail markers that match the physical trail markers in the future.
  What type of map were you looking at which showed the trails as highlighted?

  Regards,
 
  Mike Nice
Ryan112233 (2015-01-25 10:33:31+00:00): Good morning.  Thank you.  The map that shows the highlighted Jones Gap Trail and Rainbow Falls Trail is the "Cycle Map".  Interestingly the other maps (standard, transport, mapquest, humanitarian) do not.
MikeN (2015-01-29 02:37:33+00:00): Hi - We have been adding the relations to all the trails in the area; here is a link to the hiking map.  They will appear on the next iteration of the Cycle map in the next 2 weeks.    http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=13&lat=35.11326&lon=-82.59994&hill=0