piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2014-11-06 22:11:25+00:00): If http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288965624 is a Public Bridleway, then a "designation=public_bridleway" tag is the best way to indicate this.  See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Designation .  Of course, if its _name_ really is also "Bridleway" locally then it's fine to keep that as the name as well, but not if it isn't.
Michele Frascarelli (2015-09-20 14:19:48+00:00): Ma questa caverna che dimensioni ha? Frequento quel territorio da tempo ma non ne ho mai sentito parlare... Esisterà davvero?
SomeoneElse (2014-11-16 21:08:55+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3316367 really oneway=yes?  At the time that the Bing imagery was taken, it clearly wasn't (there are cars going both ways on it).
SomeoneElse (2014-11-07 21:06:40+00:00): This edit has broken the A17 / High Dike junction at Byard's Leap.  See http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/267402 .
sa-electronix (2017-06-02 19:58:00+00:00): ist Amtsstr hier richtig ???
sa-electronix (2017-06-02 20:00:21+00:00): Ich glaube das die Straßen welche du geändert hast vom namen her nicht stimmen.
Woher kommt die Information ?
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:27:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:29:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:27:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:29:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
tomhukins (2015-11-16 18:31:57+00:00): Hi, I notice you set the addr:housenumber as "1-5".  Given that Two Sisters are at number 3, this seems wrong.  Was this a mistake?
Nakaner (2015-03-28 18:20:20+00:00): Wie hast du denn die Weichennummer folgender Weiche in KA-Grötzingen ermittelt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1454668204/history Ich war am 9.9.2014 dort (einige Tage vor Inbetriebnahme) und habe von der Eisenbahnstraße aus mir die Nummer "1" statt "12" notiert. Ich habe es noch nicht geändert und überlasse dir die Entscheidung.
Nakaner (2015-03-28 18:27:53+00:00): Bei dieser Weiche ist es übrigens genauso. Ich habe "2" ermittelt, du 15. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1454668190/history
rayquaza (2015-03-31 08:03:40+00:00): Weiss ich jetzt nicht mehr, aber der Gleisplan der AVG stimmt mir zu. Ausserdem gibt es die Weichen 1 und 2 im Bf Grötzingen schon, wenn auch im DB-Teil.
sabas88 (2014-11-02 11:48:46+00:00): Manca il civico sull'ufficio postale!
Andria Tzedda (2014-11-02 15:26:36+00:00): hey dude, i just did it
sabas88 (2014-11-02 15:28:10+00:00): Good job, adesso ti mancano solamente tutti gli altri civici da inserire
wurzelknecht23 (2014-11-06 14:41:19+00:00): bla3
RicoElectrico (2015-09-19 20:36:24+00:00): Niestety rozróżnienie jest problematyczne, ale ja bym dał bardziej amenity=doctors - z uwagi na to że nie jest to duża placówka.
gormur (2015-03-19 19:57:10+00:00): Please note that 33 ways in this changeset had an empty key ("") with value "26871". I have put a fixme on those roads. Please review.
xtianetkti (2015-03-22 09:37:25+00:00): I don't know how this can append. This may came from previous map entries relocate by my way.
ubahnverleih (2014-11-10 21:05:03+00:00): ich glaube der Fußweg über den Elisabethplatz hat schon sinn gemacht. Abgesehen davon, dass Router bis jetzt nicht über Flächen routen können, wäre der Platz auch nicht mit dem restlichen Straßennetz verbunden. Und wenn es eindeutige Wege über Flächen gibt, sollten dann die auch eingezeichnet sein.
DemoLogin (2016-11-12 00:15:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310089694#map=19/59.87493/30.37862
Lokai (2022-04-24 06:34:38+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe Zeifel, dass die Quelle/Brunnen dort Hahnenbach heißt. Gibt es eine Quelle für den Namen?

Schöner Gruß

L.
Mauro1985 (2014-11-23 14:23:31+00:00): E questo perché è cancellato?
habi (2020-05-26 08:13:38+00:00): Ciao
The temple doesn't look round like that on any imagery available.
Should the round area mark the total temple area instead of being a building?
Have a good day,
Habi
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:09:57+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310129005
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 11:58:29+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107007911
mcld (2014-11-02 20:57:47+00:00): Good mapping! I've just validated this, all looks good.
mcld (2014-11-02 21:17:49+00:00): Hi Cat, thanks for your edits! I'm validating this now. Just one note: there are a couple of paths here which look like they meet the highway. I would therefore have connected the path to the highway - I think you probably chose not to because of the slight imagery offset with the highway. I've joined them up. Thanks
mcld (2014-11-02 20:36:24+00:00): Hi John - thanks for your edits! I just noticed that in this changeset, there are two bodies of water which are marked with water=* tags, but they also need to be marked with natural=water. I have made this change myself now, so no worries, just letting you know.
mathieuS (2015-09-28 16:16:44+00:00): If you happen to map in this area again, be extremely careful when using Bing imagery, because it is highly distorted here.
Martin Sauter (2015-09-28 16:43:49+00:00): That's what I realized, so I stopped mapping this area 11 months ago.
mathieuS (2015-09-28 16:58:06+00:00): Well, you can use the orthophoto provided by Cartoriviera, 2012. It is easily accessible in JOSM.
Martin Sauter (2015-09-29 05:58:56+00:00): That's obviously quite a difference, and Cartoriviera is probably more trustworthy than Bing here. Thanks.
emacsen (2014-11-03 01:05:49+00:00): This is a huge changeset that spans continents without a changeset comment that includes things like deleting schools?

What is the source that you're going off of on this changeset?
zimba (2014-11-02 12:33:50+00:00): Super Changes!

(Die Diskussionsfunktion ist mir nie aufgefallen. ;-) )
IdealChain (2014-11-02 20:34:16+00:00): Supergeil.
Durko_freemap (2014-11-29 20:13:17+00:00): Zdravim, ak sa ta ulica naozaj vola Hlavna, tak pouzite tag name=Hlavna, addr:street je nespravne. Dakujem
BushmanK (2014-12-15 19:43:29+00:00): Прочитайте, пожалуйста, вот эту статью внимательно и исправьте все за собой в соответствии с ее содержанием.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Names
SK53 (2016-01-20 16:38:56+00:00): You've added the Bury, Manchester & Bolton Canal in this changeset. However, I believe most of this no longer exists on the ground. For instance the section running through the N part of Moses Gate Country Park (i.e., N of Hall Lane) is now just a track. I think other bits of the canal may best be tagged waterway=disused_canal.
fgouget (2018-05-26 10:15:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans ce changeset vous changez la limite de vitesse de la Rue du Martinet de "50" à "50;90".
Or le champ "maxspeed" doit avoir une valeur numérique ce qui n'est pas le cas de "50;90". Aussi je ne comprends pas le sens de cette valeur. Pourriez-vous m'expliquer le pourquoi du changement ?

Merci,
SomeoneElse (2014-11-04 13:55:23+00:00): Thanks for spotting that part of Church Way isn't oneway.  I've changed the northern bit (see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26548723) to bicycle=yes rather than access=bicycle since "bicycle" (or foot, motor_vehicle, etc.) should replace "access" in access tags with the value being "yes", "no", or whatever.
ianlopez1115 (2014-11-03 13:37:05+00:00): should be "refine part of tertiary road". typos suck
Sanniu (2017-06-18 11:28:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76109075/ - is it כפר ערבי or כפר עברי?
Moovit Team (2017-11-21 14:34:12+00:00): it is כפר עברי.
Sanniu (2017-11-21 15:00:43+00:00): Fixed, thanks
alphensebezorger (2017-04-21 16:50:29+00:00): Hello frenz,
the two ways created in this changeset are tagged 'landuse=civic'. I can find any documentation on this tag. Maybe building=civic was intended for the buildings, but some landuse=* tag seems appropriate for these ways too. I know it has been a while, but can you remember what landuse would be fitting?
SomeoneElse (2014-11-06 21:49:11+00:00): Was http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310222652 actually surveyed?  Its relationship to the hedgerows along the way suggests perhaps not, and if not a fixme or a note at either end would be a good idea to get someone to survey it.  

Stuff added from NPE is usually rubbish (or at least in the need of surveying), and the fact that it gets flagged up on QA sites is good - it indicates that it's rubbish and needs surveying.  "Fixing" NPE stuff unfortunately removes that.
eggie (2020-05-03 10:31:45+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. wellicht kun je er je voordeel mee doen bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
os-emmer (2023-12-13 20:12:04+00:00): Hi amckenna_REACH,
it seems like you added a lot of notes in this area using the street=* tag. What does that mean? Is it a synonym for addr:street=*?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4025675
chriscross99 (2014-11-02 13:04:49+00:00): Company address (voipwerk GmbH) added.
Heinz-Gerrit (2014-11-28 08:03:58+00:00): Bahnueberfuehrung mit Hochstrasse es geht nicht in den  Siedlungsweg oder Bahndamm abzufahren!
frosm (2019-06-21 19:42:03+00:00): bonjour
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2975323024
que veux-dire parcelle=no ?
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-01 16:47:34+00:00): Ich hab an den kleinen Sträßchen (z.B. Kunstmeile) das access=destination in motor_vehicle=destination geändert (sonst hätte es auch für Radfahrer und Reiter gegolten). Heute war ich da spazieren und sah keinerlei Beschilderung, die den Verkehr irnkwie einschrönke. IMHO sind das ganz normale highway=unclassified, die dem Verkehr zur Verfügung stehen. Vielleicht war da mal eine Beschilderung, die jetzt weggenommen wurde?
neuhausr (2014-11-03 17:28:25+00:00): typos (nzme instead of name) in Ohare west bypass ramps
szali (2014-11-04 21:09:18+00:00): Szia! Véletlenül elhúztad az egész Csörnöc-Herpenyő patakot a helyéről. Revertáltam az elhúzást. (A JOSM szokott amúgy szólni, ha 20-nál több node-ot mozgatsz egyszerre.) Üdv, szali
*Martin* (2014-11-10 08:12:47+00:00): Ahoj Mirec. Týmto editom si zrejme poškodil aj nejaké polygóny a multipolygóny čo spôsobilo napríklad aj to, že v takmer celých Nízkych Tatrách sa prestali renderovať lesy. Ja som zatiaľ len nahrubo núdzovo opravil ten najväčši miltipolygón. Môžeš prosím opraviť spôsobené škody?
Ďakujem.
*Martin* (2014-11-10 19:26:59+00:00): Ahoj Mirec. Revertol som tento changeset kedze to bolo dost urgentne vzhladom na rozsah poskodenia. Prosim vykonaj znova uzitocne zmeny, ktore boli v povodnom zamere tohoto changesetu, ale prosim ta, pred uploadom na server ber do uvahy chyby a varovania hlasene validatorom v JOSM. Dakujem :-)
Durko_freemap (2014-12-16 22:50:11+00:00): Zdravim Spagy, chyba mi vo Vasom tagovani adries addr:streetnumber, prosim prestudujte si tento link http://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov, dakujem.
AgusQui (2014-11-08 05:08:15+00:00): Hola, que bueno que estas agregando paradas de bondis, pero fijate que lo estas haciendo mal, aqui esta la convencion para hacerlo: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Argentina/Transporte_p%C3%BAblico cualquier duda avisame y te ayudo, saludos
SomeoneElse (2014-11-07 21:42:31+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3156913797 really a place=locality?  OS_OpenData_StreetView have the north-south ridge feature marked as "The Ridge" - perhaps that's what you were referring to?
user_3022894 (2018-12-04 19:09:46+00:00): Hi,
ich wollte nur sagen, dass auf dem hier von dir geänderten Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55359615, bicycle nicht "designated" ist. Nirgendwo steht dort ein blaues Schild! Es ist einfach ein nur für Fußgänger und Radfahrer passierbarer Weg. Ich ändere die Werte daher auf "yes" um. Viele Grüße, Lukas
Art Penteur (2015-01-20 06:47:54+00:00): Le nœud 3156971837 (
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3156971837 ) est un bureau de poste dont le nom est entièrement en majuscule.
Cela est contraire à l'usage d'écriture des noms de lieux dans OSM (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Toponymes,_odonymes#Majuscules.2C_minuscules_et_trait_d.27union ) , où à l'IGN (http://education.ign.fr/sites/all/files/charte_toponymie_ign.pdf, section 4.9.1)

D'ailleurs ces bureaux de poste sont proposés à l'intégration via Osmose pour qu'un utilisateur humain puisse faire des contrôles et correction.

Dans l'avenir, merci de penser à corriger le champ "name" des bureaux de poste.

De plus, il y a aussi un bureau de poste décrit par la ligne ("way") 87643781
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87643781 . Il y a vraiment deux bureaux de poste dans ce village ?

Merci.
joedal-osm (2014-11-02 21:12:05+00:00): test
SomeoneElse (2014-11-07 22:02:33+00:00): What's the source of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3157054132 ?  It certainly doesn't look like Bing...
VictorIE (2021-11-04 15:27:33+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310292688

I'm wondering if the double name is deliberate. name="Kellswater; Kellwater". There are about 10 such instances. Might alt_name=* be an option?
Stephen_Co_Antrim (2021-11-04 18:24:02+00:00): It should be Kellswater throughout. I am not sure where the Kellwater comes from. I have never heard that form used, and I have lived within a fieldlength of the river for over 30 years.
Stephen_Co_Antrim (2021-11-04 18:24:32+00:00): It may have been a typo by me way back?
VictorIE (2021-11-05 04:10:15+00:00): "Edited about 7 years ago". :) I've corrected the name from Collin Road to the River Maine.
Stephen_Co_Antrim (2021-11-05 10:45:59+00:00): Thanks VictorIE
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-18 17:25:56+00:00): Zagadka - co z tymi torami jest nie tak? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168519112
Mauro1985 (2014-11-18 11:49:17+00:00): La tua modifica è di due giorni successiva a queste note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/262159 e http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/262160 
Se hai risolto il problema chiudile.
ViriatoLusitano (2014-11-02 12:28:54+00:00): Bom trabalho!
naoliv (2014-11-03 10:19:28+00:00): Teste
emacsen (2014-11-03 10:20:09+00:00): Test
ViriatoLusitano (2014-11-03 10:33:18+00:00): I confirm I recieved e-mail notifications for both of your comments.
lezurdis (2014-11-02 12:41:05+00:00): Nada a dizer, só queria ver como funciona esta nova função de discussão nos changesets. Desculpe pelo incomodo ;-)
CloCkWeRX (2015-08-17 03:37:37+00:00): This doesn't seem right at all: apartments and roads named all of the same thing?

If its a vanity suburb or similar community, it's better to draw a landuse=residential around it and name those.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-05 01:15:28+00:00): Hi, NguyenNguyen@TMA. I adjusted the primary road (way 156353673) based on Maxar Premium Imagery because it's newer than the others imagery. Please tell me if I'm wrong. Thank you
GerdP (2015-11-20 20:16:19+00:00): Hi there!
I found the tag surface=1 on a highway=trunk. Do you remeber
what you intended to map ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213716651
GerdP (2015-11-23 13:11:47+00:00): I've tried to fix it, see 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35529975
Durko_freemap (2014-12-17 16:01:26+00:00): Zdravim, vymazte cestu 310342065, pretoze je zakreslena na cestu 310342018, dakujem.
Paul Berry (2015-10-30 15:54:56+00:00): Really this shouldn't be marked as a secondary road but a tertiary one (except on the trunk sections). However it does allow the route to show up as being special in some way.
Vclaw (2014-11-04 00:46:42+00:00): You have mapped several forest tracks as highway=unclassified. These should be tagged as highway=track. The 'unclassified' tag is only for minor public roads.
ediyes (2016-12-13 21:36:27+00:00): Hola Annisa,

Yo pienso que en vez de usar building=residential para este área https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310367968/history sería mejor un landuse=residential?
Nakaner (2016-07-02 06:55:34+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz und andere vergleichbare Änderungssätze, in denen What3Words-Daten in OpenStreetMap hochgeladen wurden, wurden durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40434097 ganz oder in Teilen zurückgesetzt.

Zu Unerwünschtheit von What3Words in OpenStreetMap siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40434097
anderfo (2017-01-25 20:38:17+00:00): Hei,
jeg tror det er feil å gjøre om bydelsnavnene til nabolag. Jeg har derfor reversert noen av endringene (bl.a. på Moholt, Tyholt, Heimdal og Byåsen som er betydelig større enn nabolag).
Hvis årsaken til degraderingen var at de ikke er definert som "administrative bydeler", så tror jeg det er feil, slikt skal angis med bydelsgrenser. Stedsnavn er noe annet...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features#Places.2FSteder
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features#Borders

Anders
naoliv (2014-11-03 12:50:51+00:00): `teste`
SomeoneElse (2014-11-03 15:06:08+00:00): It's probably with revisiting this list looking for other issues too.  For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130305027/history is probably building=yes as well (the imagery certainly suggests so)
geoaria (2018-01-09 15:12:36+00:00): سلام
در ترسیم کانال آب مهدی شهر اشتباه هات متعدد وجود دارد. اتصال به مسیر های عبور خودرو اشتباه است. در هنگام عبور کانال از مسیر های پیاده و سواره یا باید از پل استفاده کنید یا از تونل. متاسفانه از هیچکدام استفاده نکرده اید.   اشتباهات شما در حال اصلاح می باشد . لطفا از ویرایش مجدد نقشه خودداری کنید
SomeoneElse (2014-11-19 00:26:19+00:00): What's been mapped here doesn't match my recollection from a month ago.  There weren't three parallel bridges here, only one (wide) one.  The path to the southeast was also not named "Tow path".

When were you last here?  Have things changed very recently?
richardbrinkman (2014-11-02 21:29:22+00:00): Nice micromapping of the busstation.
A few remarks however:
1. Try to avoid geometries without any tags. For the database they are just garbage.
2. Don't intersect two ways that are on different layers (footpaths (on layer 1) with the busroutes (on layer 0))
3. The footpaths are not really there. Also they are not connected to anything. How should the passengers walk from the busplatform to the train station? Better to use highway=pedestrian for the whole area.
4. avoid using a way (highway=service) within an area (highway=service) with the same tags.
5. have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_Transport#Buses on how to tag a busstation using the public transport schema (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport)
richardbrinkman (2014-11-02 21:37:25+00:00): Also check http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?zoom=19&lat=52.22167&lon=6.88937&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
Adrianod (2014-11-02 20:24:48+00:00): Hej! Ser att du har ändrat på korsningen Storgatan/V. Esplanaden med kommentaren "från väst till öst". Jag vet att man inte kan köra rakt fram över esplanaden, och det var inlagt på kartan redan med en turn-restriction.

I din redigering har du dragit upp Storgatan till Västra Esplanaden så den korsar två andra vägar utan att sitta ihop med dom, vilket inte är ok.

Var det något annat du försökte uttrycka med din redigering? Är det ok om jag ändrar tillbaka?
Gazer75 (2015-03-29 22:05:43+00:00): If you use special letters in names then make sure the streets match. No idea what the special sign is, but it's not available on any keyboard.
gormur (2015-03-29 22:55:27+00:00): Example?
Gazer75 (2015-03-30 05:29:00+00:00): All names with an apostrophe. You can find them using OSM Inspector. Using this apostrophe is creating problems imo. Only way to type it in Windows is by using ALT+0146 on the numpad. No GPS unit I have seen is capable of typing this as well. Yes, there is a difference between ’ and ' First one might be grammatically correct, but the latter can be typed by any keyboard and gps unit that I know of.
So far it looks like at least OsmAnd+ simply changes ’ into ' in their maps.
gormur (2015-03-30 08:56:46+00:00): This changeset only touched the addr:postcode, as the comment clearly says. Please comment on the original changeset.
Alan Bragg (2020-06-23 10:41:53+00:00): Is the "Arnold Trai" ferry route a snowmobile trail? If so the snowmobile tag is missing
aj_34 (2019-07-09 06:06:48+00:00): "Hi Catursp,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way 310448912 which is not supported by any of the resources, can we remove this way?

Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
seav (2014-11-02 13:41:51+00:00): Great job! (test comment)
Víctor L (2015-07-15 00:20:28+00:00): Me parece que el oratorio que está dentro del aeroparque, hace veneración a la Vírgen de Loreto (patrona de las fuerzas aéreas y de la aeronáutica) y no a la Virgen de Luján.
itineris (2019-12-03 18:20:32+00:00): Szia!

Tudom, hogy régen volt, de a sükösdi Hangyász utca nevének mi a forrása? Sehol sem találok rá hivatkozást, más térképek sem tudnak róla. A kocsibehajtó (szervizút) folytatásának tűnik, nem utcának.

Üdv:
Ákos
Takuto (2015-10-14 13:36:24+00:00): Привет. Посмотри пожалуйста переулок Резервный - там два дома 7А. Это правда или опечатка?