piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
emergency99 (2016-05-17 12:22:49+00:00): Sadly, I do not know maps.me. But if you use an editing function, tgen the nodes will always be posted... But I really have no clue how to put private pins on the map. 

Nevertheless, be careful what you save on this app. There seem to be a lot of problems with users of this app accidently changing stuff..

Thanks,
em99
lakedistrict (2016-12-02 17:48:44+00:00): What is the line/way that you've added ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372635979 )? It has a source tag but nothing else.
geri-oc (2020-02-02 08:54:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1343360

Bin gerade darüber gestolpert. Vielleicht access=* in motor_vehicle ändern?
Routing
Gruß Gerd.
uvi (2020-02-02 16:23:33+00:00): Hallo Gerd, an den Zugangsbeschränkungen hatte ich seinerzeit und vor allem auch in diesem Änderungssatz keinerlei Änderungen vorgenommmen. Der "Fehler" ist also nicht von mir. An einigen Wegen (z.B. hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82670592) hat der "Fehlermelder" auch schon selbst Korrekturen vorgenommen.  
Du kannst da gern weiter machen. 
VG Uwe
Mahir Goska (2016-06-04 23:14:28+00:00): Kubati
Chetan_Gowda (2016-05-27 12:22:15+00:00): Hey @wondogenet, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM is free editable map and you con contribute more by adding right information to it. Seems like you've deleted lot of roads in this changeset. It'd  be better not delete others work when they put lot of their time in mapping. :)

http://osmcha-django-staging.tilestream.net/39329264/

Cheers,

Chetan
mavl (2016-08-07 12:26:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы изменили название остановки (тег name). Похоже, что вы хотели указать адрес. Для указания адреса испльзуются теги:  
addr:street  
addr:housenumber  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
Hjart (2016-05-15 12:47:53+00:00): Hej
Velkommmen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag indtil nu.

Vær opmærksom på at du under "baggrundsindstillinger" til højre kan vælge ortofotos fra Geodatastyrelsen, som er fra foråret 2015 og dermed nyere end standard billederne fra Bing.
jkw_mammut (2016-05-15 13:01:58+00:00): Tak for info :)
Er Geodatastyrelsens billeder de nyeste man kan få?
Jeg kan se at Google Earth er opdateret for nyligt.
Hjart (2016-05-15 13:11:52+00:00): De er de nyeste vi må bruge. Vi har explicit tilladelse til at bruge de billeder der er mulighed for at vælge i vores redigeringsværktøjer. Med Google Earth ramler vi ind i noget copyright, så det holder vi os langt væk fra når vi redigerer OSM.
Når vi skal lave nye veje der endnu ikke er med på tilladte ortofotos, så kører vi en tur på dem med en gps og bruger de spor til at tegne efter i stedet
R0bst3r (2016-05-17 14:39:12+00:00): Please use defined keys. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
john86 (2016-05-20 20:08:47+00:00): Die 3 Haeuser 18, 18a und 19 sollten irgendwie mit einer Notiz versehen werden, warum die Strasse _nicht_ Kiefernweg ist. Andere Mapper (mich eingeschlossen) waeren sonst leicht versucht, dies anzupassen!
s0mik (2018-09-06 13:05:54+00:00): А чего за монумент то?
marczoutendijk (2016-05-16 11:48:10+00:00): Is dat een publieke telefoon?
Lees ook de welkomstmail die ik je stuur.
matt_ellery (2017-08-16 22:37:56+00:00): Hi Rikki, do the footpaths follow the path of the service roads mapped in this changeset or are they actually separate?
Durko_freemap (2016-05-16 07:09:01+00:00): Zdravim Vierkuska,
1. ten obecny urad opravte prosim na amenity=townhall (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dtownhall)
2. nieje nutne pridavat name typu name=pošta, tag ako taky uz toto vyjadruje
Vdaka za opravy. Durko
frosm (2020-03-18 14:27:17+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418298852/history
vous avez renseigné cette borne comme étant gratuite. l'opendata dit qu'elle est payante, pourriez-vous vérifier ?
SomeoneElse (2016-07-18 20:39:57+00:00): I suspect that you might want to split at least 2767188 in here, since even the browse page for it http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2767188 times out!
Matthieu Gaillet (2016-07-19 10:33:45+00:00): That's a known issue, but as far as I know that's the only side effect of having very long relations. As you saw the EV12 is already split in multiple parts and I don't think it's really feasible to further split it.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-19 11:06:15+00:00): I just wanted to give you a heads-up - at some future JOSM upload it will break and the relation will become "mysteriously empty".
Matthieu Gaillet (2016-07-19 13:03:56+00:00): That would be a josm bug ;-)
literan (2016-05-16 13:44:35+00:00): вандалим? а по рукам?
bilderhobbit (2016-05-16 10:39:54+00:00): Sowas kann passieren wenn man im Josm einen Node markiert hat und der Ausschnitt verschoben wird. Der letzte Bearbeiter einer von war Mentz.
glglgl (2016-10-11 14:29:24+00:00): FYI: Ich habe einige der hier entstandenen Relationen mal in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landkreis_St._Wendel eingetragen.
FahRadler (2016-10-11 17:41:38+00:00): Sehr schön.

Jetzt fehlen halt noch ein paar...
glglgl (2016-10-12 14:52:53+00:00): Und einige der vorhandenen sind sehr vage, weil ich nur den ungefähren Verlauf kenne oder mich an Indizien entlanghangele, gerade im Bereich HOM, Blieskastel, Mandelbachtal. Falls du da genauere Daten hast, wäre das klasse…
olo81 (2020-01-05 03:35:02+00:00): Cześć! 
Zaznaczyłeś tamy na potoku i się zastanawiamy czy to nie pomyłka?
Na skaningu laserowym tam nie widać. Może chodziło o przepust, albo jeszcze coś innego?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-19 10:53:38+00:00): hello!

sorry for bothering about ancient edit - but maybe you still remember or visit this place...

Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3993550
White_Rabbit (2017-12-09 10:53:33+00:00): Ho notato solo ora il cambio da ref=SPVII a ref=SP7 che hai fatto in provincia di Brescia. Non mi convince: i cartelli segnano tutti SPVII. Mi sono perso qualche nuova convenzione della comunità italiana?
Alecs01 (2017-12-09 12:06:58+00:00): Ciao, c'è qualcosa qui http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:ref#Indicazioni_specifiche_per_l.27Italia e c'era uno strumento ad hoc di correzioni errori ora non più raggiungibile https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/41550819/OSM/Errori_in_Italia_Grp/index.html e qualcos'altro qui sui numeri romani/arabi http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:name non ho una forte opinione in merito devo dire, il numero arabo mi sembra meglio perchè più facilmente leggibile da un software rispetto ad un numero romano (che è composto da lettere), ci può stare anche un'eccezione però se la strada è sempre indicata in quel modo, sai per caso se c'è un motivo particolare?
White_Rabbit (2017-12-11 09:31:31+00:00): Anche io trovo il numero arabo più leggibile, sia da un software che da un umano, ma provando ad immedesimarmi in un umano che sta usando OSM per viaggiare, preferirei una corrispondenza fra la mappa e il territorio. Da una rapida occhiata su it.wiki mi pare che questa situazione sia unica in tutta Italia: le altre province che ho controllato usano solo numeri arabi. Forse ci sono ragioni storiche. Comunque anche l'unica fonte "ufficiale" che ho trovato usa le cifre romane.
White_Rabbit (2017-12-11 09:32:16+00:00): http://www.provincia.brescia.it/sites/default/files/allegati/documenti/3694/carta_viabilita_per_sito_internet.pdf
Alecs01 (2017-12-11 20:58:13+00:00): Vedo, mi sembra di notare che anche le altre provinciali con numerazione romane sono così anche in OSM, come questa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147544707 ci sta come caso particolare, se la numerazione ufficiale e i cartelli la indicano così. Modificala pure tu come era prima, puoi anche creare la relazione "route=road" per unire i vari tratti tra di loro. Ciao
user_5359 (2016-05-15 16:18:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Exists in the building "FNB BANK" a financial institution?  Please add amenity=bank.
gallseife (2017-02-05 17:08:16+00:00): In`s 'name' tag gehören die offiziösen Straßennamen, nicht irgendwelche Funktionsbeschreibungen.
chillly (2016-05-18 19:35:19+00:00): Not sure understand the point of adding name:fr=* which is exactly the same as name=*. Surely software should just fall back to name=* tag.
trial (2016-05-18 19:55:29+00:00): it is *not*, in French you have hyphens, not blanks as separator.
For alt_name:fr, it's because the alternative name is also valid in French. There is a subtle difference between I don't have the name, use the default one and this is correct in your language.
trial (2016-05-18 20:00:29+00:00): And yes, [coalesce](http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/functions-conditional.html#FUNCTIONS-COALESCE-NVL-IFNULL) does the job, except in some case.
Let ave a IT/FR/EN preference. The user on a dynamic map would see the one with hyphens because the name:it is not given, not the name.
chillly (2016-05-18 20:07:18+00:00): I seem to have hit a raw nerve, judging by your terse answer. I now see the hyphens. I'm so sorry for diverting you from whatever it was that you were doing and working you up into a lather.
trial (2016-05-18 20:25:16+00:00): No, it's good to question (especially as you did it very politely). And the discussion for having the same name in different languages equal to the default language is perfectly valid. We had it on [talk-fr]... and I thought as you BTW ;-). But the case of multiple user language preference was raised.
xmd5a (2016-05-16 18:40:52+00:00): А вы подумали что будет если каждый пометит могилу своей бабушки? OSM не место для личных вещей.
AlbertP (2016-05-15 21:23:37+00:00): Should have been done with my main account AlbertP
user_5359 (2016-05-16 13:49:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the meaning of tourism=viewpoint: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint . I can't see any viewpoint on the aerial image! Please delete your private entries.
freeExec (2016-05-16 08:47:10+00:00): А что убрали метеобудку?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2069412047
golyanitskiy (2016-05-18 17:57:39+00:00): Не обратил внимания, что эта старше была, там еще есть (в том месте, где она на самом деле), но можно и вернуть https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2992095108/
freeExec (2016-05-19 07:25:03+00:00): А, ну если дубликат, тогда фиг с ней. Теги вроде одинаковые.
dieterdreist (2023-02-22 10:58:53+00:00): Hi, I noticed you have created ways with access=private, for example here: way 418338778
This tag means that the way is not generally accessible. But these ways (some of them) are part of hiking relations, so the tag seems likely to be in error, do you remember why you set it?
Cheers,
Martin
IIVQ (2023-02-23 15:22:09+00:00): Hi.
This is strange, I can not remember why I made this edit. In fact, I can not remember ever having been in this area, so I don't know why I changed or even created these ways.
I would be ok with you removing the access=private.
dieterdreist (2023-02-24 11:06:26+00:00): it is strange, because the from the history of the nodes it is clear that you not only created the way (as it would be possible e.g. by splitting an existing way), but you actually drew this way and added the access-tags, likely you did so after a ground survey.
Cheers,
Martin
poornibadrinath (2016-05-16 08:17:18+00:00): Hi, @Radu Pantan
building=yes tags should only be used on the polygons and not on individual nodes. there is some excellent documentation about learning to edit on OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
Radu Pantan (2016-05-16 10:12:20+00:00): Ok, thanks!
Kengaru (2017-03-13 10:11:02+00:00): Привет. А откуда взяли название мыс Броневой? Я не нашёл ни в одном доступном мне источнике.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-05-16 14:03:52+00:00): Hi @joaquin nandez, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You are free to contribute to OSM unless you don't add some fiction buildings, roads. I see all your edits are in sea. Can you take some time to read OSM wiki and practice good editing. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide. Thank you :)
brendan714 (2016-05-18 16:13:09+00:00): Would be helpful if you tagged these ways as needing repair before deleting them entirely. Refinding the data is sometimes very hard / impossible. We are working to fix all the raw tracks but would appreciate tagging of tracks we've missed. Thanks!
Hjart (2016-05-15 19:54:47+00:00): Hvad jeg typisk gør i den situation er at tjekke hvad nogen af de andre routere siger til en strækningen, som f.eks. http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.3263%2C10.2776%3B55.3151%2C10.3026. Jeg oplever ind imellem at Osmand vægter klassificeringen af veje forholdsvist højt og da Store Markvej. kun er "unclassified" kan det sagtens være grunden til at Osmand vælger at fortsætte ad Assensvej indtil Klemmeløkken, der er klassificeret som tertiary. 
Jeg måler Store Markvej til at være ca 4.5 m bred og vil mene det for en landevej er nok til at klassificere den som tertiary og dermed øge chancen for at Osmand bruger den. (jeg gider ikke tertiaries der er så smalle at begge biler skal trække ud i grøften når man møder en modkørende)
MicDK (2016-05-16 08:19:09+00:00): Jeg oplevede i praksis en omdirigering via Klemmeløkken/Assensvej i stedet for den langt kortere rute via Store Markvej.

Fint at du har sat bredden ind, jeg har sat 80 km/t ind som hastighedsgrænse og belægning som asfalt. Jeg er dog enig i, at der er tale om en mindre vej, hvor to biler kun lige netop kan mødes (4-4½ m bred).

Så må vi tjekke i næste opdatering af Osmand, om det har den ønskede effekt. 

Osmand er dog stadig langt bedre end andre navigationsapper - f.eks. Google Maps som dirigerer én på en større omvej via motorvejen syd om Odense.
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:53:33+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418363838
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 13:20:32+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50227164
highflyer74 (2016-05-17 09:42:01+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

In JOSM buildings can be made rectangular by selecting them and pressing "q" on the keyboard. That is a good help when adding buildings. Also, the the key "building" is only added to the building itself and not to the nodes the building consists of. Also it is advisable to add a changeset comment and tell others the source of the data when uploading new or modified objects.

If you have any questions, you can have a look at the OSM Wiki, the OSM forums or mailing lists.

Happy mapping!
Blackbird27 (2016-05-17 11:30:36+00:00): This looks like import of some kind of GIS data, there is no buildings there only fields and farmlands, will report this changeset as act of vandalism on forum and let others revert changes.
highflyer74 (2016-05-17 11:34:10+00:00): Ok, thank you! Unfortunately I did some editing in the NW part of the changeset already, as I initially did not see the size of the affected area. That of course makes reverting more complicated... See you!
Blackbird27 (2016-05-17 11:36:59+00:00): No problem it still could be reverted with popper tools, you changes will be deleted as well.
dudka (2016-05-17 11:52:30+00:00): I've removed buildings and nodes created in this changeset.
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39374735
Noen (2016-05-16 16:51:27+00:00): De ser ut til at alle bussholdeplassene du la til finnes i OpenStreetMap fra før.
Det kan være fordi kartet (i MAPS.ME) ikke oppdateres like ofte som databasen.

De blir nå fjernet igjen.
Barbulescu Constantin Ionut (2016-05-15 21:06:46+00:00): Modified and created the buildings from Crisan town, modified some roads and rivers lines, also riverbank and town border. All the buildings have now straight corners and are aligned to the road (as the case).
R0bst3r (2016-05-16 20:53:31+00:00): Hallo Moloko77,

das hier ist als ATU Filliale getaggt. Du hast es als Mercedes-Benz benannt. Was stimmt den nun?

Gruß, R0bst3r
R0bst3r (2016-05-16 20:53:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25879679
user_5359 (2016-05-16 13:14:36+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ich habe mir erlaubt Deine Änderung zurückzudrehen, da es keine so großen Häuser gibt, in dem noch Straßen und weitere Häuser existieren.
zarl (2016-05-17 07:38:35+00:00): Was bitte ist ein DNF?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418378953
zarl (2016-09-01 08:24:11+00:00): Jetzt erledigt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41843317

Herzlichen Dank für die konstruktiven Beiträge.
user_5359 (2016-05-16 13:16:16+00:00): Nochmals willkommen! Welche Bedeutung haben bei Dir Gebietseingrenzungen (area=yes) ohne Beschreibung (und eine Abkürzung im Namen ist keine Beschreibung!)?
zarl (2016-05-17 07:44:14+00:00): Geofreak16 scheint den Editor iD auszuprobieren, im Bing Luftbild ist an dieser Stelle nichts zu sehen, was hier sinnvoll als area zu mappen wäre. Ich halte das für revertierbar. Seine komplette osm Historie erscheint mir als source=Langeweile.
zarl (2016-09-01 08:02:51+00:00): Ich habe das jetzt gelöscht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41842956
marczoutendijk (2016-05-16 11:50:06+00:00): Wat heb je precies gewijzigd?
Zie ook de welkomstmail die ik je gestuurd heb.
datendelphin (2017-06-26 15:41:21+00:00): Hallo Zugersee
Danke für das Erfassen des neuen mountain bike trail. Ich hab mal etwas das wiki angeschaut, weil ich "cycleway" nicht so optimal finde. Ich denke üblicherweise wird das als path getaggt. Wäre das ok wenn ich das umtage?
Grüsse
Michael
Lokai (2025-12-20 19:14:42+00:00): Hallo,
 eine Frage zu diesem alten CS. Der Gipfel des Ebersberg östlich von Schwarzenbach. Ich konnte einen Ebersberg weiter südlich auf amtl. Karte finden. Bei den Hochspannungsleitungen.

Dann noch der Webersberg, in der amtl. Karte ist eine andere Höhe angegeben.

Liegen hier Fehler vor?

Gruß
L.
Lokai (2025-12-21 15:22:01+00:00): Hat sich erledigt. Die Daten wurden von mir geändert. Die GPS Höhe entsprach der der amtl. Karte. Zudem hast du die Gipfel nicht urspr. eingetragen.
Lokai (2025-12-24 10:41:21+00:00): Eine(!) Karte habe ich gefunden, bei der der Ebersberg woanders liegt, die große Mehrheit und die Uraufnahme sind sich einig. Auch gibt es einen Flurnamen. Hier ist die eine Karte wohl nicht korrekt.
smyje846 (2016-05-15 23:19:39+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan #別府市 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
vasony (2016-07-29 10:28:59+00:00): Szia!
Van valami oka, hogy visszaírtad a régi nevére az utcát amit az önkormányzat megváltoztatott?
Tamás
Rumcajsz (2016-07-29 10:37:30+00:00): Szia!
Bocsánat! Nem is emlékszem, hogy nevet adtam volna neki, ha igen, akkor elnéztem valamit.
Zsolt
vasony (2016-07-29 10:40:18+00:00): OK, akkor visszaírom a Tolsztojt
Schukla (2016-05-15 23:48:56+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan # #別府 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
Schukla (2016-05-15 23:47:01+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan #??? source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
Schukla (2016-05-15 23:49:19+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan # #別府 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
smyje846 (2016-05-15 23:20:01+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan #別府市 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
Sampk48 (2016-05-15 23:49:17+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan #別府市 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
Sampk48 (2016-05-15 23:48:46+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan #別府市 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
Sampk48 (2016-05-15 23:48:24+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan #別府市 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
Schukla (2016-05-15 23:48:00+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan # #別府 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
Jaime Folkard (2016-05-16 00:01:00+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan #別府市 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
Schukla (2016-05-15 23:48:37+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan # #別府 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
Sampk48 (2016-05-15 23:47:24+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan #別府市 source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
harrison42 (2016-05-15 23:52:40+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan  source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
harrison42 (2016-05-15 23:51:31+00:00): #hotosm-project-1800 #crisismappersjapan  source=GSImaps/ort #uotagogis2016
nigelgoulstone (2016-05-15 23:49:22+00:00): 1
Laura Flannery (2016-05-16 00:24:47+00:00): #uotagogis2016
Laura Flannery (2016-05-16 00:24:23+00:00): #uotagogis2016
Laura Flannery (2016-05-16 00:23:59+00:00): #uotagogis2016
Laura Flannery (2016-05-16 00:22:53+00:00): #uotagogis2016
marcioaguiar (2016-05-17 11:42:51+00:00): Olá, Raí! Obrigado pelas contribuições.

Só algumas observações:

- Não é recomendado mapear prédios e localidades utilizando a mesma linha de uma via.
- A via de ligação Craíbas - Folha Miúda é de acesso público e não "permissive".
- Para mapear o destino da via utilize a tag destination=Folha Miúda, por exemplo. Não se coloca essa informação no nome da via.

Abraço
poornibadrinath (2016-05-16 07:34:48+00:00): Hi, @Olimpia Copancenaru. Building=yes tags has to be applied on a polygon and not on individual nodes. There is some excellent documentation about learning how to edit on OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
user_5359 (2016-05-16 13:37:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154082383 ? I think you add the some hotel. Please delete your entry as doublet.
The Filbert (2016-05-16 03:39:37+00:00): Also corrected street names
trigpoint (2016-05-16 11:46:48+00:00): Hi, something has gone a little wrong here.
Notes were left by a local mapper to indicate things that need a survey.
The nodes you have deleted contain more information than that of the business, there is address data there too which remains valid when the premises are taken over and it also maintains history. 
The note on the lamplighters specifically says it is now a restaurant so that is what the node should become. The note indicates that a passing mapper needs to look at the new name.
I am reverting this change.
highflyer74 (2016-05-17 12:28:20+00:00): Hello!

Just to let you know: when you tag substations you can tag the voltage by using only one key (voltage=*) and then as the value the different voltage amounts from highest to lowest, separated by a ";". That makes tagging easier for you and also fits the recommendation in the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsubstation).

All the best and happy mapping!
kudomenagi (2025-11-11 13:54:12+00:00): OpenStreetMapに情報を追加してくださりありがとうございます。ご登録いただいた情報の修正をしたため、ご連絡いたしました。

実はプライバシーに配慮するため "do not add the names of inhabitants to dwellings (住民の名前を住居に追加してはならない)" というルールがOpenStreetMapにはあります（出典：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_private_information）。おそらくtakkkkenさんご本人の判断の上でご自宅に自身のお名前をつけられたのだと思います。しかし、本当にご本人の同意の上で個人情報が登録されたかどうかを、他のOpenStreetMap利用者からご確認することが難しいため、上記ルールが定められております。

誠に勝手ながら、編集履歴を辿りにくくするため、ご自宅を一旦削除した後改めて追加いたしました。もし、ご不明点や問題点がありましたらご連絡いただければ幸いです。
pdxrider (2016-05-16 05:51:10+00:00): I am a bit troubled by the kinds of edits you're making. I appreciate that fact that you're adding turn lane data here, but you're adding the wrong data to most places. Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5869287 has lanes=0, then lanes:forward=0 (but lanes:backward=2). Zero total lanes doesn't make sense. Do you understand how to add lane data appropriately?
Alecs01 (2016-05-16 18:29:41+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! hai inserito un hotel che ha nell'indirizzo via Palmanova, ma posizionato lungo via Feltre, riusciresti a spostarlo nella posizione corretta (o correggere l'indirizzo)? grazie
user_599436 (2016-05-17 12:32:18+00:00): This way looks like it got disconnected from other roads during this edit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20144871
Endres Pelka (2016-05-18 13:57:39+00:00): Das einzige, was Sie im "K in Lautern" geändert haben, ist der Name völlig in Großschreibung. Das macht wenig Sinn und ist auch nicht korrekt, ich korrigiere es gleich. Warum machen Sie das? Ich habe schon zwei von Ihren Changesets kommentiert, Sie haben nie geantwortet! Zeigen Sie welche Verantwortung für Ihre Edits, sonst werden Sie gemeldet.
Jake Meyers (2016-05-19 05:20:42+00:00): #PeaceCorps
Jake Meyers (2016-05-19 05:20:02+00:00): #PeaceCorps