piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-08 02:26:08+00:00): سلام ضمن خسته نباشید، جایگاه سوخت گاز که ویرایش کرده بودید، جزئیاتی هم افزوده و بهسازی شد.
Dimacn (2020-06-30 12:25:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. можете объяснить что за  парк отдыха на частных участках? В OSM допускаются только реальные объекты. Трава с деревьями - это ещё не парк отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите добавленные вами парки отдыха.
SomeoneElse (2020-06-30 00:46:46+00:00): Oops - I don't think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821197408 is such a ong bridge is it?
Mike Raust (2020-07-02 16:01:05+00:00): Hi Trav,

have you deleted the tracks because of too low quality?
→ https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87310281
TravGW (2020-07-02 19:09:49+00:00): I normally try to fix or adjust them. In this case it was not worth the effort to all of them.
Frans S (2020-07-10 09:15:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I reviewed your mappings on this task
Please be more accurate in following the outlines of a building and square all rectangular buildings. (44 out 104 were not proper squared)

An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
SGorskiy (2020-06-30 04:25:17+00:00): На каком основании вы удаляете существующие здания? От куда источник адресов?
literan (2020-06-30 17:42:37+00:00): opening_hours ntu это тег для POI. Для дорожных объектов такой условный доступ корректнее обозначать через conditional (кстати, его поддерживает Osmand). В частности, здесь подойдет такой тег 

access:conditional=no @ (Mo-Su 00:00-06:00,22:00-24:00) + bicycle=yes +
foot=yes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Исправлю
literan (2020-06-30 17:42:53+00:00): ntu=это
ynx (2020-07-01 19:21:44+00:00): Не знал. Спасибо!
literan (2020-06-30 17:34:22+00:00): не тот тег взяли. Исправил.
Max-Kritic (2020-07-02 08:03:06+00:00): Bonjour, Tu peux voir tes erreurs sur http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#username=Eric-Chambly

Il y en a beaucoup (> 500). Surtout des parkings inaccessibles faute d'être connectés à la voirie.
Nakaner (2020-06-30 12:19:48+00:00): Hallo,

heißt der Container wirklich "Altglas"? Ich bezweifle das. Bitte erfasse nur einen Namen, wenn das Objekt auch einen Eigennamen hat. Siehe dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Bezug: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26938587/history

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87311690
Flurps (2020-06-29 23:05:06+00:00): Good first edit (I'll pretend eh)

Way could be better aligned (More northerly, less diagonal) (Use the ESRI/City of Cape Town imagery for these areas); Tagging of incline removed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87311778
Frisbeelee (2020-08-08 08:55:20+00:00): The thing is, this isn't just a north-south line. You could walk due east from grove walk. It's an open space. There are even parking spaces on both roads. It's an open area not easily defined by a path
Frisbeelee (2020-08-08 08:56:01+00:00): You could even walk north-east straight to Grove Avenue
Flurps (2020-08-11 21:37:42+00:00): I'm gonna side with you, far more local eye :) I just see it when driving past these days.

Maybe we go with a pedestrian area thing, since it is an area with odd features and the area would help define it. Will give it a ponder in the next while.

(Lived along Huggon like 10 years ago; Thought the sidewalk that went along Grove connected through in a straight line towards the Bowwood+Cavendish intersection. Think your path is far better for the general case!)
felipeeugenio (2020-06-29 20:31:19+00:00): Estimado. La letra Q sirve para cuadrar los polígonos.
Los está dejando todos chuecos.

Saludos
gileri (2020-06-29 20:25:13+00:00): source=survey
Peilscheibe (2020-06-30 06:59:04+00:00): Hallo Dani Delfin,

willkommen bei OSM. In diesem Changeset hast Du mehrere existierende Objekte gelöscht, bei anderen Objekten zutreffende Attribute entfernt. Gehwege die Du separat eingetragen hast, waren bereits als sidewalk an der Straße erfaßt. Separat tragen wir das in der Regel nur dann ein, wenn der Gehweg baulich getrennt ist und/oder es komplexe Anschlußsituationen gibt.
Der edit ist weit unter dem Qualitätsstandard, den wir bisher in Stuttgart entwickelt haben. Ich habe die Änderungen daher rückgängig gemacht.

Bitte schaue Dir die Hilfeseiten zu OSM an um zu verstehen, wie OSM funktioniert und wie man welche Daten einträgt. Hier ein paar Links dazu:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/help
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap
http://learnosm.org/de/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Wenn Du Fragen hast, hilft die lokale Community immer gerne weiter.
Die Stuttgarter OSM-Community findest Du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stuttgart/Stammtisch
http://lists.openstreetmap.de/mailman/listinfo/stuttgart
Ich stehe für Fragen auch immer zur Verfügung.
Grüße, P.
Dani Delfin (2020-06-30 21:28:26+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe,
danke für deine Rückmeldung.
Da ich erst seit gestern OSM benutze, war ich tatsächlich zu voreilig mit umfangreichen Änderungen. Daher bin ich dankbar, wenn jemand, der mehr Erfahrung hat, nochmal drüberschaut. ;)
Jedoch war das Zurücksetzen der Änderung z.B. des DEKRA-Komplexes nicht unbedingt notwendig, da ich da nur die ganzen einzelnen Gebäude, wie sie in OSM dargestellt sind, zusammengefasst habe. Die Sache mit den Fußwegen war mir gar nicht aufgefallen, danke für den Hinweis.
Muss tatsächlich noch viel lernen.
Grüße Dani Delfin
5m4u9 (2020-06-30 22:56:44+00:00): hola ale, gracias por actualizar los cambios de sentido de vías en LA Paz ;-)
bielebog (2020-07-22 07:47:16+00:00): Ist der Mast https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/807736711 tatsächlich wegen der WKAs umgesetzt worden?
bielebog (2020-07-22 08:07:25+00:00): Den von flohoff annotierten Graben nördlich des Huchtgrabens hab ich mal wieder anhand der gelöschten Nodes rekonstruiert. Generell ist es sinnvoller, nicht eine vorhandene Geometrie umzunutzen (Bachlauf->Huchtgraben), um ein neues Objekt zu erstellen. Wobei der Huchtgraben ja auch schon vorher in OSM existierte.
user_10799485 (2020-07-22 09:17:46+00:00): Hallo Bielebog, was soll ich mit dem Mast gemacht haben? Den kenne überhaupt nicht und habe nicht berührt. Sagst Du mir bitte noch mal genau wo der Huchtgraben ist. Ich habe hier kürzlich mehrere kleine Gewässer, die hier in der Karte im nichts endeten an die nächst größeren Gewässer der Realität entsprechend angebunden.
bielebog (2020-07-22 20:55:03+00:00): Hallo Der Wilderer, 
den Mast habe ich durch Revert dieses Changesets auf dem Objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88367412 wieder an seine alte Position verfrachtet. Der betreffende Teil des Huchtgrabens ist die westliche Verlängerung dieses ways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311791958
Auf Openstreetmap.org (und *.de) kannman auch nach Objekten suchen.
Prima ein Changeset analysieren lässt sich bspw. mit dem Tool achavi: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87313512
VictorIE (2021-12-30 13:50:46+00:00): Hi,

Is the name here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821234435 actually "2nd Terrace"? Is there a name plate or perhaps people call it "2nd Terrace"?
severance (2021-12-30 19:22:35+00:00): Hello,

I'm not sure, I add buildings here when I do visualisations the number of the building doesn't show up when I download it, on google maps its called Dernish Ave
MMN-o (2020-07-06 09:57:12+00:00): Tack för att du noterar när saker är färdigbyggda! :)
TheTylerS (2020-06-29 22:28:27+00:00): Source should be Maxar Standard Imagery (-1.13; 2.63), Strava
pza (2020-06-30 02:22:38+00:00): I made some further revisions to remove some more A4 tags in changeset 87318725.  I realised after submitting that I reverted your removal of A4 on way 385523796 which is currently named Western Distributor.  I would have thought that way, and also way 650388086 (which probably should be renamed to Western Distributor??) should have the A4 tag.  Before we make further changes, is there somewhere we can get a definitive source for this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87315727
Ausmeerkat (2020-06-30 02:39:46+00:00): I've previously tried and failed to find a definitive source of NSW route number paths. The closest I've seen is https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/documents/roads/using-roads/alpha-numeric/sydney-map.pdf which is too low-res to help much in this case. If you go by the signs, the Bradfield Highway is "To A4" southbound; the first actual A4 sign doesn't appear until under the Pyrmont Bridge (https://www.google.com/maps/@-33.8709852,151.2033023,3a,75y,204.17h,76.31t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s4N6nWdvuZu3DC0K6rfX1PQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192). So my guess is that A4 starts at around the south end of the bridge, but it's hard to be sure exactly where.
Ausmeerkat (2020-06-30 02:43:44+00:00): BTW it was also tricky to decide exactly which ways should and shouldn't have the M1 tag at the north end of the bridge. Technically it probably shouldn't be M1 until the tunnel has emerged, but all the signs say M1 as soon as you're off the bridge, even when in lanes you can't access from the tunnel.
Ausmeerkat (2020-06-30 02:57:30+00:00): This isn't a reliable source, but FWIW this resource claims A4 ends at "Bradfield Hwy & Cahill Expressway, Millers Point" : http://www.ozroads.com.au/NSW/RouteNumbering/Metroads/4/met4.htm
pza (2020-06-30 10:39:13+00:00): In addition to this, there is also an A4 route relation (see 3161722) which needs to be fixed, I guess to be consistent with what ever is decided on the road ref tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87315727
pza (2020-07-13 23:08:45+00:00): I have removed some more ref=M1 from some other lanes in changeset 87945182.  I did notice on my morning drive that the Cahill Expressway exit is indeed marked as M1 when after coming off the bridge. I would have thought the sign should read "To M1".  I'm really not sure if we should be tagging the eastbound part of Cahill past circular quay as M1.
Ausmeerkat (2020-07-14 05:43:45+00:00): Yeah I've noticed the same on the sign and I believe it to be a mistake - the M1 follows the tunnel, so the elevated Cahill Expressway can't be M1. 
I did actually find an authoritative source on route numbers: https://portal.spatial.nsw.gov.au/portal/home/item.html?id=9bfc5c6f6e354e7aa22a8565f173bd83#visualize . You need to zoom in and click on the segments to see the metadata. That absolutely answers the M1 question, but it still leaves me confused about A4. First, the now-bypassed Parramatta Road (newly signposted as A44) still shows A4 in this data, so it may not be current. On the eastern side, the data shows A4 ending at the western edge of the Anzac Bridge, implying neither the Anzac Bridge or Western Distributor is A4. But - if you zoom in far enough for the map to change to greyscale, it show A4 shields along the Anzac Bridge and Western Distributor all the way to the south end of the Harbour Bridge (i.e. what's now in OSM). So I'm not sure which of those should be considered correct. The latter is definitely closer to the signage on the ground.
pza (2020-07-14 22:46:27+00:00): As you point out the data is clearly wrong and/or out of date. The link you sent uses the LPI NSW Base map at lower zoom levels, but falls back to the ArcGIS World Topographic Base Map when you zoom in, which is where you see the A4 shields. The ArGIS base map is very ordinary for Australia so shouldn't be trusted (and I'm sure has copyright issues if we do reference/copy).

I think the OSM maps are in a sensible state now - largely consistent with the road/lane markings. It is also logical from a "route" perspective, in that the A4 starts at the point immediately south of the on/off ramps, which coincides with where "name=Western Distributor" starts.  Maybe the govt has a better consistent source somewhere, but OSM is meant to map what's on the ground, not what the Govt thinks is right.  That's my 2c anyway.
lakedistrict (2020-06-30 17:27:10+00:00): Thanks - resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1900452
5m4u9 (2020-06-30 22:51:39+00:00): hola, gracias por mejorar la senda.
abakus_uploader (2020-06-30 22:31:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2020-06-30 04:47:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better desciption of your object please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shop
camelCaseNick (2020-07-01 11:38:09+00:00): Hey,
Wikipedia has no article Achiwuib. Is en:Achiwib and the corresponding Q4673804 not about this place? Those seem to match.
(And the link at name:source here does not mention Achiwuib.)
CamelCaseNick
Glassman (2020-06-30 05:32:53+00:00): Can you provide some source that these are not parks? Some of the notes describe the areas as a park.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87317748
Adam Schneider (2020-06-30 05:58:51+00:00): The link I provided in the "source" field talks about it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park

"The goal is to harmonize tagging of 'parks' in the USA with OSM's definition here by better tagging areas in the USA now denoted as leisure=park with other, more appropriate tags, such as leisure=nature_reserve, boundary=national_park or boundary=protected_area."

There is more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands
Glassman (2020-06-30 15:29:10+00:00): Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. For specific areas that were tagged as leisure=park, what source do you have to say they should be tagged as something else? For example, Doug's Beach in Washington. I originally added the area. Another mapper changed it to leisure=park. That mapper is a former state employee that is familiar with the area. I trust his judgement. He's done some great work adding features in Washington State.
Adam Schneider (2020-06-30 15:46:55+00:00): I've been to Doug's Beach. It has a very small "park"-like area along the river, but most of it is rugged and wild. For others, it's pretty obvious from aerial photos whether or not an area has been landscaped and made into a "park."
Glassman (2020-06-30 17:15:22+00:00): I can't speak for Oregon but in Washington, only two state parks have areas set aside as natural area. Before making wide spread changes, I would suggest contacting the prior mappers about your proposed changes. You can find a number of mappers on Slack. slack.openstreetmap.us.
Adam Schneider (2020-06-30 18:02:08+00:00): I'm going to go with the guidance in the OSM wiki, which is unambiguous in saying that only manicured (abd usually urban) landscapes should be tagged as parks.

The only question, I think, is whether state parks like Doug's Beach should be nature_reserve or national_park.
Frans S (2020-07-02 13:12:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please pay more attention on squaring your buildings with the Q key. Your mappings are quite accurate but needs often squaring.
Best regards
vojtechzaboril (2020-08-17 08:59:44+00:00): Dobrý den, stačí místo nesprávné tagu highway=primary použít highway=constructiton (neboť OK je již ve výstavbě) a construction=primary (popř. secondary, tertiary).
Pozor také na nesprávnou hodnotu lanes=*
V
Kovoschiz (2020-06-30 09:07:10+00:00): Is the foundation somehow covered up, or is it filled with vegetation?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87319923
ystsoi (2020-06-30 09:39:27+00:00): According to the user, the path was damaged, probably due to a typhoon. Also, many barbed plants have grown. He spent over an hour finding ways out, and his friend had an accident at a place filled with moss.
Kovoschiz (2020-07-04 11:37:37+00:00): I changed it to a `abandoned:highway=path` first. By "user", are you working on an app, website, or any service?
ystsoi (2020-07-04 12:45:51+00:00): I see. Yes, he is a user of the Hiking Trail HK app.
SK53 (2022-08-23 15:41:22+00:00): I dont know if you can remember if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24016687 looked like a track? It does on aerial images, but I merely drove past last time I surveyed in Kneeton.

I plan to change the first bit to track for now.

Jerry aka SK53
◪ Jarv (2022-09-02 21:44:51+00:00): I can't remember that one & haven't been in that area since 2020 before I started my camera achieve.
jmapb (2020-06-30 18:24:06+00:00): Thanks, great to see the new bridge is open. I connected the Boiceville parking area service road to the trail and added the missing parking areas. I also tried to standardize some of the tags across the various rail trail sections.
tastrax (2020-07-01 03:42:56+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
PT-53 (2020-06-30 15:11:04+00:00): Hallo Sammelmütze,
welche Verbindung besteht zwischen den von Dir gelöschtem Adress-Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2600554792/history
und Deinem CS-Kommentar
Corrected "duplicate_ways" (OSM Inspector) ?
Fragende Grüße
Sammelmuetze (2020-07-03 06:10:45+00:00): Keine.
Gruss
eggie (2020-06-30 07:47:11+00:00): Hi komoot,
Some problem now here....
This is an official cycleroute 18-21
It's even a cycleway

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87325037?xhr=1

Perhapos only the track is access=private?

Please reply,

Eggie
Validator Dutch Community
Access Claims (komoot) (2020-06-30 07:50:50+00:00): Hi Eggie, thanks for validating that! Apologies, we should've confirmed that more thoroughly, please update it accordingly. We will inform the land owner.
eggie (2020-06-30 07:54:36+00:00): Oke.. thanks
Please revove access = no from the highway = unclassified at both sides.
The access=no on the track is perhaps okay.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2020-06-30 07:55:12+00:00): typo   :)  please remove....  etc. 
Thanks for reply
eggie
eggie (2020-06-30 08:02:27+00:00): At the unclassifieds is also a hikingroute.
In this matter two routerelations are blocked.
ralley (2020-06-30 07:38:22+00:00): Hi, whats the source for this being a regional park?  It doesn't appear in the Auckland Council list at https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/parks-recreation/Pages/search-index.aspx
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87325378
ChookMan (2020-07-03 23:01:53+00:00): Source: 

https://data-aucklandcouncil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/02f8f2fea2224b70896122de4d1943fe_42?geometry=174.686%2C-36.978%2C174.803%2C-36.954
ralley (2020-07-04 01:16:52+00:00): Thanks for confirming that.
eggie (2020-06-30 07:51:52+00:00): In such a case we tag access=private
Greetz,
eggie
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-02 18:53:01+00:00): Hello,

Apologies for the delayed response, as our team has changed since these edits were originally made.

Thank you for raising this point and for the corrections that were applied.
eggie (2020-06-30 07:50:43+00:00): Please consider your access=no

A cycleway.. access=no?
Access Claims (komoot) (2026-06-02 18:52:44+00:00): Hello,

Apologies for the delayed response, as our team has changed since these edits were originally made.

Thank you for raising this point and for the corrections that were applied.
UW Maddie (2020-09-02 13:02:29+00:00): every feature added from bing bird's eye imagery are completely deleted
UW Maddie (2020-09-02 13:06:00+00:00): the reason i deleted them was because use of bing bird's eye is not allowed here due to licensing concerns
PT-53 (2020-06-30 07:08:29+00:00): Hallo SLMapper,
Dein Source-Link funktioniert nicht.
Ich erhalte eine Fehlermeldung 404.
Bitte überprüfe Deinen Link.
Grüße
SLMapper (2020-06-30 20:02:20+00:00): Danke. Scheint das source feld (oder alle felder) erlauben nur 256 Zeichen. Habe das jetzt mit tinyurl gelöst.
damjang (2020-07-02 19:20:16+00:00): Ciao Giovanni! Non è vero, Prebeneg è sia in italiano che in sloveno, questo dal 17. dicembre 2017. Vedi https://ilpiccolo.gelocal.it/trieste/cronaca/2017/12/18/news/prebeneg-si-riappropria-del-nome-d-origine-1.16255355 e https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/PYQYLk91KXH-8W7ujVDmEQ
Supaplex (2020-07-16 13:07:33+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Bert Araali (2021-05-17 16:29:37+00:00): Can you please explain why this changeset changed the international border between DRC and UG and why you are doing mass deletions ?
Bert Araali (2021-05-17 16:30:47+00:00): Project 8886 seems not to exist on HOT website. Please explain what you did in the changeset comment.
Cascafico (2020-06-30 10:16:12+00:00): sembra sia stato OK dalla sua creazione, nel 2014:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/272966979
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87329239
user_5359 (2020-06-30 07:54:05+00:00): Hello! Please use mix case characters for the name value, use standard key and DON'T add any private information like pincode to a building.
Mammi71 (2021-02-18 17:15:09+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe,
von Privatgrundstück auf residential zu schließen halte ich für sehr gewagt. Selbst Maps4BW weist nicht das ganze Grundstück als Wohngebiet aus.