piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-02 16:25:19+00:00): it was Persian Gulf and that name come from Persia And now the official name in most of the countries surrounding the Gulf is "Arabian Gulf" not "Persian Gulf" see:

name on the official maps in Saudi Arabia and from an official government website: https://www.gcs.gov.sa/en/productsandservices/products/publicmaps/pages/official-map-of-the-kingdom-of-saudi-arabia.aspx

and official maps in UAE from an official government website:
https://u.ae/-/media/4BDAEA7E82FB4B8AAAE9D70A2E4D88A1.ashx?db=master&amp;la=en&amp;vs=1&amp;ts=20171018T1537576451

and official maps in Oman from an official government website:
https://www.nsaom.org.om/lndex.php?inc=downloads/maps
https://www.nsaom.org.om/arabic/downloads/jpg/Satellite.jpg

and official maps in from kuwait an official government website:
https://www.moo.gov.kw/about_kuwait.aspx

and official name in bahrain from an official government website::
https://www.bahrain.bh/wps/portal/aboutBahrain_en

and official name in Qatar from an official government website:
https://portal.www.gov.qa/wps/portal/about-qatar/aboutqatar

and see the name from Official website of Gulf Cooperation Council:
https://www.gcc-sg.org/en-us/Pages/default.aspx
uffeg1 (2021-01-04 16:29:56+00:00): This is the Arabian Gulf according to history and the peoples surrounding it from everywhere.
uffeg1 (2021-01-04 17:02:03+00:00): This is the Arabian Gulf according to history and the peoples surrounding it from everywhere.
SomeoneElse (2021-01-04 23:01:37+00:00): Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  If anyone's considering changing the name of this relation I'd suggest discussing it more widely, perhaps on an international mailing list such as https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk.  It's also worth noting that most of the languages on http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=9326283 use some variation of "Persian Gulf" rather than "Arabian Gulf"
Best Regards,
Andy
ABDULLAH AL WERFALLI (2021-01-05 21:33:06+00:00): The official name is the Arabian Gulf. Most of the countries that overlook it are Arab. Most of the inhabitants of the regions in Iran that overlook the Gulf are of Arab origins
Mahdi Nameghi (2021-01-06 05:18:19+00:00): This is PERSIAN GOLF. according to histories and any resources. please do not use other names.
Mahdi Nameghi (2021-01-06 05:26:14+00:00): *PERSIAN GULF
kiaraSh-Q (2021-01-06 12:40:21+00:00): Hello
this is for Andy
I don't think there's any need to discuss about it! the name of this gulf is Persian Gulf as it's been always.
Most of IRAN's neighbors are Arabian countries and it doesn't mean they can change the name of this country, or some parts of this country, or even one part of this country to another name.
All of that countries that are trying to change the name of the gulf are smaller than one province of Iran and their population is lower than one city of Iran. They are mostly very small and new countries and some of them are city-countries. Iran's coast line along the gulf is longer than all of their coast lines along it.
We don't say "it is Persian Gulf" because we are bigger or more than them, we say it because it is.
And we don't say it must be Persian Gulf because it belongs to us(but they do), we say it is Persian Gulf because it's its name and as I mentioned it has been always.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-06 13:40:10+00:00): Persian Gulf not part of Iran to force people to that name ! and if want the name according to histories then name Iran Persia, the Persian Gulf was the name of that gulf and now the most of countries around it name it "Arabian Gulf"
MahsaMoghadas (2021-01-06 13:52:42+00:00): @ abdullah abdulrhman 
In such cases, the sources that we are likely to come across are historical sources and references Not political or governmental. 
Historical revisionism including distortion and falsification of historical records are considered deception and fraud. 
There are too many references that everyone can find at digital libraries, databases, and even google that the name of this gulf is the Persian Gulf. 
With the greatest respect for our Arabian neighbors and friends
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-06 14:41:05+00:00): The historical name has changed in most countries and officially, and I explained this in the previous comment, and if you want to use it, use it specifically on your language on the tag "name:fa" and if you want to use historical name but it on the tag "old_name"
MahsaMoghadas (2021-01-06 15:06:52+00:00): The historical name means that is the international name (written in all textbooks). We cannot just change any name based on the gray literature in our home countries.
Mostafa Ahangarha (2021-01-06 15:08:00+00:00): old_name is usable when there is a new name. The official name of this Gulf is Persian Gulf and if Arab Nationalism demands brain washing for next generation, they can do it in the text book. But your wish cannot change historic facts

Don't mess up with Persian Gulf. Spend your time on something more useful.
dval (2021-01-01 10:42:23+00:00): Hi, Energizer1986! Вы здесь удалили дорогу класса service. Не велика, конечно, потеря, но какая-то дорога здесь проглядывается всё-таки, может быть стоило переклассиф. её в трэк, например. Также вы добавили участок земли как резиденшиал. Думаю, это неверно, поскольку в Вики написано следующее: "Земельный участок, принадлежащий жилым частным или многоквартирным домам". Этого здесь нет. Есть здания, где люди проживают временно. Эти здания как раз не помешало бы нарисовать. Также вы не включили участок в мультиполигон с ролью inner, поэтому на нём сейчас виден лес. Думаю, правильнее было бы просто не трогать границу промышленной зоны в этом месте.
Energizer1986 (2021-01-01 10:59:51+00:00): трак вместо сервис нарисовал. пожалуй, вы правы. Насчет резиденшинал. пожалу
Energizer1986 (2021-01-01 11:04:40+00:00): пожалуй неверно. Но это выделяет место проживания наглядно. Мультиполигон я чуть подкоректировал, очень приблизително. Главное что понятно это производсвенная территория. Подробнее нет особого желания рисовать. Есть более интересные дела.
03142 (2020-12-30 19:02:43+00:00): https://pasteboard.co/JHmhXfB.jpg
نقشه راه ها
many852123 (2020-12-31 01:34:28+00:00): These images are made by your mind and have no validity
03142 (2020-12-30 19:02:55+00:00): https://pasteboard.co/JHmhXfB.jpg
نقشه راه ها
many852123 (2020-12-31 01:34:21+00:00): These images are made by your mind and have no validity
mueschel (2021-01-02 10:48:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

- These edits look like some group mapping activity. Please point the organizer to our guidelines: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

- Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data. Tags like 'condition of building = O' or 'building condition = M' are useless because they are not documented.

- buildings are usually rectangular and don't have odd angles - please use the 'make square' feature of your editor

- name of objects should be just the actual 
name, no descriptions like 'γενική κατοικία' or 'κ'.
mavl (2020-12-31 08:13:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.
Напишите, пожалуйста, вы получили от росреестра разрешение на использование его данных в OpenStreetMap?
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-01 18:38:45+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96685935
mueschel (2021-01-02 10:47:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

- These edits look like some group mapping activity. Please point the organizer to our guidelines: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

- Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data. Tags like 'condition of building = O' or 'building condition = M' are useless because they are not documented.

- buildings are usually rectangular and don't have odd angles - please use the 'make square' feature of your editor

- name of objects should be just the actual 
name, no descriptions like 'γενική κατοικία' or 'κ'.
chris_huggins (2020-12-30 21:27:32+00:00): Hi Robert. No need for the fixme tag here. I set the access tags based on the signage on the ground which is a ‘no vehicles’ sign  (one of these https://images.app.goo.gl/RyQM3SAz3SRtZLqE9) at the southern end at the point of the bollards.
Robert Whittaker (2021-01-16 12:45:49+00:00): Many thanks.
ualios (2022-06-28 14:14:16+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro del nome di questa strada, oppure lo hai preso dal vicino toponimo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42767542
opendcc (2020-12-30 20:09:41+00:00): Da ist jetzt ein Knoten in die Wege reingekommen, ich mußte das zurücknehmen. Was wolltest Du eintragen?
stein2147 (2021-01-02 11:05:14+00:00): Die Wegeführung hat sich 2020 geändert. Es wurden teils neue Wege angelegt
opendcc (2021-01-02 11:38:38+00:00): Ja, dann aber bitte ohne die Linien zu verknoten und sich selbst überkreuzen zu lassen.

Der Feldweg von der Mü26 nach Osten, der geht jetzt weiter? Bis an den Rand des Rotholzes?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-12 22:45:03+00:00): fake mapping? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/890245666
Warin61 (2021-08-27 07:20:25+00:00): Relation 12114121 is not closed. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.43335&lat=-36.76260&zoom=12

Suggestion: do NOT chose existing boundaries for other unrelated features for these tree boundaries. Doing so means any changes to these other things may (will) break the tree relation - thus making more work.
breno-au (2021-08-29 04:06:32+00:00): Thank you for reviewing my changeset. Relation 12114121 is now closed/fixed.

I thoroughly agree with you and am attempting to remove natural multipolygons from administrative and other boundaries. It's a massive project though as there's been a lot of historical use on OSM to share these ways in the early days.

One approach which I started 8 months ago was to break down the one massive natural=wood multipolygon into more manageable pieces. Even after segmenting the beginning of the southern section in my edit, the massive poly still stretches hundreds of kilometres from the Vic border to Bondo SF. Having such a large relation is difficult to work on and is easily broken at a macro scale.

My edit was not to untangle natural=wood cover from adminstrative boundaries just yet, but rather break down the massive relation first, then untangle the two components later at a local level.
Warin61 (2021-08-29 08:42:48+00:00): If you go back in history .. those tree areas were even bigger... I have broken them up into smaller ones .. still large but there is other stuff to do. 
Good luck with it.
Warin61 (2021-09-02 07:31:38+00:00): Note relation 12114121 is borken, and now being rendered as treeless. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.51986&lat=-36.69353&zoom=11
breno-au (2021-09-06 09:48:06+00:00): Thank you for reviewing my changeset. This relation has now been fixed.
Warin61 (2021-09-07 05:07:38+00:00): Yay, confirm fixed.
Reza Babri (2021-01-02 05:20:35+00:00): سلام
درمورد محل چهارتپی یه کم شک دارم. به نظرم میرسه که ممکنه شمالتر و نزدیک قله ابیدر باشه.
لطفا چک کنید و درباره محلش مطمئن بشید. اگه جی پی اس زده باشید که مطمئنتره.
اگر احیانا مشخص شد که محلش همینجا نیست، این نقطه رو پاک نکنید. فقط اسمش رو حذف کنید.
Reza Babri (2021-01-02 05:27:29+00:00): این تگ
natural=cliff
برای ثبت دیواره استفاده میشه. به نظر میرسه که اینجا منظور شما دیواره نبوده. اگر منظورتون دهلیز بوده از این تگ استفاده کنید:
natural=couloir
syntex (2020-12-31 14:41:24+00:00): Highway=service jako area? Nie spotkałem się z czymś takim
Mariusz 2M (2021-01-06 22:19:09+00:00): Gdzieś to zauważyłem i zacząłem stosować - ładnie się renderuje, nie wpływa na routing.
felipeeugenio (2020-12-30 22:18:56+00:00): Estimado
por favor usar la letra Q para cuadrar las estructuras.
saludos
mueschel (2021-01-02 10:49:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

- These edits look like some group mapping activity. Please point the organizer to our guidelines: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

- Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data. Tags like 'condition of building = O' or 'building condition = M' are useless because they are not documented.

- buildings are usually rectangular and don't have odd angles - please use the 'make square' feature of your editor

- name of objects should be just the actual 
name, no descriptions like 'γενική κατοικία' or 'κ'.
Frans S (2021-01-02 09:27:01+00:00): Hello. A remark
Please read my comments a few days age and improve your mappings.  Do not collect multiple buildings and map it as a single building.
corfede (2021-01-02 18:42:11+00:00): Ciao Andrea, non sono per niente convinto che questa antenna possa essere taggata come tower, mi sembrava più adeguato il vecchio tagging man_made=mast, come descritto sulla wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast) l'antenna in questione è perfettamente riconducibile a quella in foto (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Mobile_phone_base_station_2010_12_30_165211_PC304165.jpg). Anche il tag tower:construction=Palo è certamente sbagliato, al massimo potrebbe essere "freestanding" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:construction). Cosa ne pensi? Ciao, Federico.
Andreag00 (2021-01-02 18:48:50+00:00): Ciao Federico, grazie della segnalazione, ho appena cominciato a contribuire a OSM, quindi non sono proprio esperto nella differenziazione tra i vari tag. Concordo con ciò che mi hai fatto notare, se vuoi procedi alla correzione, altrimenti faccio io e sistemo anche le altre due che ho modificato.

Diciamo che l'immagine del tag mast porta un po' in confusione, infatti, IMO, sembra riprodurre più un carrato (a causa delle due strutture di supporto ai lati) che un palo freestanding.
corfede (2021-01-03 16:30:48+00:00): Ciao Andrea, grazie per la risposta e per per la correzione che hai già fatto. Più imporante ancora del tag construction (che hai modificato in freestanding) è però il tag man_made, che dovrebbe riportare "mast" e non "tower" come prima delle tue modifiche. Grazie ancora, Federico.
Andreag00 (2021-01-03 20:58:53+00:00): Ciao Federico, ho modificato il tag da tower a mast. Però guardando semplicemente il pin come viene presentato in mappa trae un po' in inganno. Infatti io avevo inserito il tag tower in quanto non presentava strutture di supporto laterali, proprio come la BTS in questione.

Non so se sei d'accordo, ma l'immagine del tag mast per un mast freestanding non ha molto senso visto che mostra strutture di supporto laterali che questo tipo di mast non hanno.

Buona serata, Andrea
corfede (2021-01-04 07:11:48+00:00): Ciao Andrea, non ci avevo fatto caso, però quello che conta è la wiki di OSM, dove come hai visto ci sono tutte le spiegazioni per ogni tipo di tagging ufficiale, con anche foto di esempio. Magari l'icona che hanno scelto per il rendering non è molto felice, oppure diciamo che è generica.
marc__marc (2023-04-24 22:17:41+00:00): Hello,
date:source -> source:date
Regards,
Marc
Reza Babri (2021-01-02 05:51:56+00:00): میزان خرابی یک ساختمان رو میتونید با این تگ مشخص کنید:
building:condition=*
برای انتخاب مقدار مناسب برای این تگ به توضیحات ویکی اپن استریت مراجعه کنید.
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-01 18:42:53+00:00): Hi paudibazar, welcome to OSM.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Reza Babri (2021-01-02 06:01:23+00:00): توجه داشته باشید که این تگ
natural=rock
برای تگ صخره مشخص در محیط غیر صخره ای به کار میره. اگر در این منطقه صخره های متعدد وجود داره یا محیط کلا سنگیه، این تگ کاربرد نداره. 
در اون صورت شاید  بنا بر پوشش زمین این تگ رو بشه استفاده کرد:
natural=bare_rock
البته توضیحاتش رو حتما مطالعه کنید تا برای اون منطقه تگ درست رو انتخاب کنید.
ALu68 (2020-12-30 21:47:05+00:00): Hallo jonidorsch, willkommen bei OSM.

Wenn Gebäude abgerissen worden sind, aber auf den Luftbildern zu sehen sind, sollte man die Gebäude Umrisse und die Adressen nicht entfernen.
Zum einen könnte ein anderer User es wieder einzeichnen, da es ja auf den Luftbilder zu sehen ist, zum anderen können die Daten für ein neues Gebäude wiederverwendet  werden.

Happy mapping. Andre


Hier etwas zur Einarbeitung in OSM
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:removed:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:razed:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Revert changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96692229
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111752715
Frans S (2020-12-31 15:22:48+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping here.
Hello. Thanks for mapping here.not accurate enough and not squared.
Please map each building individually and do not collect a number of buildings mapped as 1 building.
Since there are so many collections of buildings mapped as 1 building I have to revert your mappings.
On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-01 18:38:57+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96685935
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-01 18:39:52+00:00): Hi Titanium80.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Reza Babri (2021-01-02 04:38:53+00:00): سلام آقا محسن
چند نکته درباره ثبت قله دیوچال بگم
1- مطالب تبلیغاتی و شخصی تو اپن استریت ممنوعه. منظ.رم توضیحاتی است که درباره صعود زمستانی نوشتید.
2- ارتفاع قله رو اصلاح کردید اما منبع ارتفاع و دست نزدید. این تناقض داره. یا باید مقدار ارتفاع رو برگردونید به عدد قبلی یا باید منبعی که به کار بردید رو توی تگش اصلاح کیند.
mueschel (2021-01-01 11:53:17+00:00): Changeset reverted. Boundary already existed.
mueschel (2020-12-31 09:35:34+00:00): Hi,
please stop adding more and more images to this node. OSM is not a gallery.

You could create a category on Wikimedia and add only the link to the category to OSM.
mueschel (2021-01-02 10:47:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

- These edits look like some group mapping activity. Please point the organizer to our guidelines: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

- Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data. Tags like 'condition of building = O' or 'building condition = M' are useless because they are not documented.

- buildings are usually rectangular and don't have odd angles - please use the 'make square' feature of your editor

- name of objects should be just the actual 
name, no descriptions like 'γενική κατοικία' or 'κ'.
ALu68 (2020-12-30 21:50:47+00:00): Wenn du den Namen änderst, dann überprüfe auch die anderen Angaben, z.B website

Keys werden in englisch angegeben, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:cuisine?uselang=de
afghanische;international --> afghan;international
Frans S (2020-12-31 10:14:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here 
Please map buildings individually , not as clusters. 
See this document with more info about mapping
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mappings
Yunkers (2020-12-30 20:24:27+00:00): Wrzucona przez Ciebie ustawa mówi o nadaniu kategorii drogi wojewódzkiej jednak nie wspomina o nadaniu jej numer 669. Widzę w historii, że ten numer został już kiedyś wycofany przez lokalnego mapującego. Jesteś w stanie podać źródło potwierdzające numer drogi?
szalona_entropia (2020-12-31 10:43:33+00:00): Oczywiście https://edziennik.bialystok.uw.gov.pl/WDU_B/2020/4167/akt.pdf
Yunkers (2020-12-31 17:11:10+00:00): Dzięki za źródło, tylko czegoś nie czaję. Wg uchwały droga 669 biegnie "DROGA 8 – DROGA 676 /przejście przez Białystok ul. Narodowych Sił Zbrojnych, od ul. Gen. Franciszka Kleberga do ul. Aleja Jana Pawła II". Nie ma nic o Alei Niepodległości. Dałeś właściwą uchwałę, czy ja źle czytam?
szalona_entropia (2021-01-01 14:31:18+00:00): Aha, po prostu ja się nie przyjrzałem, a raczej dostrzegłem tam zapisy których nie ma :P

Nie zmienia to faktu, że to jest DW669: https://www.bialystok.pl/pl/dla_mieszkancow/fundusze_unijne/realizowane/okresprogramowania20142020/budowa-dw-669-w-bialymstoku-na-odcinku-od-skrzyzowania-al-jana-pawla-ii-z-ul-narodowych-sil-zbrojnych-dw-676dw-669-do-ul-ciolkowskiego-dw-678.html
Yunkers (2021-01-01 19:22:28+00:00): Takie se to źródło, obawiam się że zaraz ktoś lokalny zmieni, albo pojawią się notki. Zobaczymy czy ktoś zareaguje.
Swic (2023-06-09 09:54:08+00:00): Hey there,
Do you know why this path is tagged ACCESS=NO ? 
Looks like IGN 1:25000 shows a path we can use. 
Thank's
philippec (2020-12-30 20:31:35+00:00): Wegverbinding voor hulp.
De brandweerkazerne is wel verhuisd.
Ik denk dat de bediening van de lichten vanuit de kazerne gebeurde.
Het zou natuurlijk kunnen dat het nog gebruikt wordt.
charl3s (2021-01-25 13:09:53+00:00): Moim zdaniem ta droga w OSM powinna być oznaczona jako secondary, mimo, tego, że utraciła status wojewódzkiej.
szalona_entropia (2021-01-25 21:00:14+00:00): To zmień z powrotem.
ALu68 (2020-12-30 21:51:55+00:00): Hier bitte auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:cuisine?uselang=de korrigieren.
TheNet1996 (2020-12-31 09:01:58+00:00): Hallo,
bitte auch korrekte Tags für opening_hours verwenden. Der Sonntag wird mit "Su" getaggt und nicht "So".
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de
Danke & Grüße
Mike
literan (2021-01-01 13:34:24+00:00): тогда логично access=private (который ограничивает доступ для всех) заменить на motor_vehicle=private
Tomas_J (2025-08-31 19:00:01+00:00): Zdar. Obecné názvy (převis) se do name nedávají.  Patří to spíš do description.
Tomas_J (2025-08-31 19:01:55+00:00): ...to samé pro název "sklepy*  - do name nepatří.
s8evq (2020-12-30 21:31:56+00:00): Dag JosV, bedankt voor je bijdragen en je vele werk in het toevoegen van adressen in deze streek. Het was nodig! Maar toch een vraag: waarom voeg je nu overal nodes toe met de crab-import tool, in plaats van de gebouwen zelf met de GRB import tool? Is dit niet verloren werk?
Stereo (2021-03-15 00:51:18+00:00): Hi! I'm not familiar with mountain range relations and don't want to break anything, but it looks like your multipolygon could be one way. Also, the Ardennes region of Luxembourg is only North of the Sure.
Florimondable (2021-03-15 18:27:43+00:00): Hi, me either, how the multipolygon could be oneway ?

About the Ardennes region of Luxembourg, the relation is about the mountain range, so it’s a topological-geological geography not a political border. Though I’m not an expert at all about the border of this mountain range.
eggie (2021-04-04 13:44:24+00:00): Hi Joseph..

This edits give no sense. All over the place tourism=attraction?

For what use?
greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-04-04 13:56:52+00:00): reverted by changeset #102272614
ALu68 (2020-12-30 22:20:54+00:00): Diese Namen sind sinnfrei - Beschreibungen sind keine Namen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names

Verkehrsinsel: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland
FrankOverman (2021-03-26 19:30:08+00:00): Welke 32 attractions zijn dit, hier in de Loonse en Drunense Duinen?
eggie (2021-04-04 13:56:07+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #102272543

Lawyers, attractions and pharmacies all over Europe
tastrax (2021-01-09 00:10:36+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers