piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Volker Fröhlich (2018-12-03 19:59:31+00:00): Du hast auch ein Gebäude gelöscht, das von mir mit einem Fixme versehen war mit eben der Frage, ob es existiert. Nachdem Du es im Changeset-Kommentar nicht erwähnt hast, möchte ich Dich auf diese Alternative zum Löschen hinweisen, die in diesem Fall vielleicht günstig gewesen wäre (vorausgesetzt das Gebäude gab es jemals): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
farmio (2018-12-03 20:35:32+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das ehemals eingezeichnete Gebäude gab es jedoch nie. Hier sind lediglich landwirtschaftliche Maschinen abgestellt.
Volker Fröhlich (2018-12-03 20:36:08+00:00): Alles klar, danke!
will_p (2018-12-01 12:50:48+00:00): Hi,
Are you sure it's correct to add a business name here? This is a residential address and I've never seen any sign of a public facing business here. When this has been discussed in the past, the general view has been businesses run from residential addresses should not be added unless they are clearly public facing in some way.

The same point applies here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79436901
Again a residential address. This business has a website but it does not mention this address, suggesting it's not public facing. The website indicates that the business sells food from a van. 

OSM isn't intended to be a business directory. If businesses aren't verifiable on the ground or are mobile they usually shouldn't be included.

Sorry to find fault! You are doing an excellent job of keeping things up to date, but sometimes it is necessary to raise concerns.

Cheers,
Will
Dave Venables (2018-12-01 13:27:31+00:00): Hi Will,

This is your locality and you are a much more experienced mapper so I am happy to learn from your comments and experience.

As I’m sure you can tell I took the details from the Food Standards Agency http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/1009710/ and http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/454468/ with a view to improving the Erewash  https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/district-18.html percent of nodes/ways with a postcode and percentage of FHRS establishments matched. Postcodes were  taken from FHRS, from neighbouring buildings or from the code-point open centroids. Postcode percentage should be above 95% tomorrow (I’m not taking credit as you did the hard work years ago) with little reason why it could not be improved even further.

I’d previously added a residential business address in Long Eaton https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316311595 to clear a note from the owner https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1171707 requesting this.

Is the “Ladybird House” addr:housename (that was already on the Pudding House caterer way) still correct?

I can remove the business names you mention leaving just the fhrs:id values.

Thanks,

Dave
will_p (2018-12-01 17:12:30+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for removing those names. Some local authorities do seem to include the home addresses of businesses when perhaps they shouldn't. These seem to be administrative addresses, rather than the primary location where the businesses operate. For example, I have come across the home addresses of market stall holders a few times in the past. Others are mobile caterers, ice cream men and so on. I don't think there's any problem with adding the fhrs:id with a note.

There are definitely more FHRS IDs and addresses that could be added in Erewash, but when you get to the last 5 or 10% you do need to be a little more careful, because you do tend to be left the more difficult or problematic ones, which have deliberately been left until last.

I do make a lot of use of FHRS data myself, although I've been busy with other things recently and as I'm sure you can appreciate keeping things up-to-date is a never ending task. 

In answer to your other points:
I only added the addr:housename "Ladybird House" in September and it was correct then (based on a sign outside).

The business you added from the note in Long Eaton does look a bit suspect, but I think it's more borderline than the cases I raised above, because the owner asked for it to be added and the address is shown prominently on the business website. I'd definitely have a look on ground before considering whether it should be removed.

Cheers,
Will
chnav (2018-12-01 14:58:00+00:00): Здравствуйтен, объяснгите причину удаления данных аэропорта Тараз. У нас принято ИСПРАВЛЯТь данные, а не удалять. Вы удалили рулевые дорожки и т.д. Пожалуйста не делайте так больше. Если каждый новичок будет сходу удалять данные и перерисовывать заново - карта всегда останется помойкой. Всё удалённое - восстанавливаю.
chnav (2018-12-01 15:00:28+00:00): Ва\ши данные, которые дублируют существующие ранее, будут удалены. Уважайте труд предыдущих картографов.
chnav (2018-12-01 15:06:20+00:00): Please NEVER delete objects in database but rather edit it. You disrespect work of previous mapper by deleting and re-mapping objects from scratch. If you continue this practice it'll be a reason for report to Data Working Group. Thanks.
joshbaumgartner (2018-12-03 01:27:18+00:00): Thanks, my mistake
Nmxosm (2018-12-02 10:42:44+00:00): Hallo Bernhard Ffm,

ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, weil sie nicht den in OpenStreetMap üblichen Regeln entsprechen.

Du hast das bereits bestehende Willemer Häuschen auf die Straße verschoben, obwohl es sicher neben der Straße stand, wo es auch vorher platziert war.
Außerdem hast du einen Weg erstellt, den es so nicht gibt (ich kenne die Stelle). Es gibt keinen Grund meines Wissens keinen Grund, den Fußweg dort mit der Straße zu verbinden. Außerdem ist "Unterführung" in OSM kein name, sondern eine Beschreibung (siehe https://wiki.osm.org/DE:Names). Tatsächlich wäre dort auch wenn überhaupt noch nicht die Unterführung sondern erst im Gebäude.

Bei Frage melde dich bitte.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
Bernhard Ffm (2018-12-04 09:12:00+00:00): Hallo Nmxosm,
danke für die Rückmeldung. Ich bin noch am üben. Habe die "Änderungen" über die Einführungsseite gemacht und ging davon aus, dass diese nicht tatsächlich in die OSM eingehen.
Grüße 
Bernhard Ffm
Tomas Straupis (2018-12-01 16:38:58+00:00): Rašant adresą, puiku būtų pridėti ir gyvenvietės pavadinimą vardininko linksnyje, pvz. addr:city=Karveliškis
aceman444 (2025-03-25 10:21:47+00:00): Dakujem, ale tato skola uz bola zakreslena ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297449152 .
user_1470980 (2018-12-01 13:44:10+00:00): Hallo Luzandro,
ich stelle fest, dass im Osten von Österreich tatsächlich geringer aufgelöste Luftbilder zur Verfügung stehen. Durch das von Dir systematisch praktizierte Überzeichnen der Dachfläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651503771 enstehen in OSM Strukturen welche bei später verfügbaren besseren Luftbildern, ein komplettes Neu Zeichnen erfordern würden, und das wird sich vermutlich niemand mehr antun. Schaut man sich das Basemap Äquivalent im Vergleich an, https://i.imgur.com/L7Ig4M3.png so sieht man was ich meine. Ich gehe davon aus, dass Du für eine organisierte  professionellen Mapping Initiative arbeitest, sofern ich mich hier irre bitte um Einspruch. Deine Arbeitsweise versiegelt unser Projekt, und zwingt OpenStreetMap gegenüber der basemap in eine systatisch mindere Qualität. Daher schadet Deine Arbeitsweise OpenStreetMap nachhaltig. Ich fordere Dich daher auf, entweder deine schädliche Arbeitsweise einzustellen, oder unser Projekt zu verlassen. Grüße Johann
Luzandro (2018-12-01 13:59:52+00:00): Geh doch dem User imagic auf die Nerven, der die ursprüngliche Version angelegt hat, die ich hier bearbeitet habe
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/184871167
Und ich habe noch nicht vor dein nächstes Opfer zu sein, das von deiner Verhaltensauffälligkeit genervt das Projekt verlässt
user_1470980 (2018-12-01 14:08:08+00:00): Hallo Luzandro,
Du gehst nicht auf meine klar beschriebenen Argumente ein, ich bitte Dich lediglich Dein Mapping Verhalten geringfügig zu ändern. Sofern Du das wie einige andere User strikt verweigerst, muss ich davon ausgehen dass Du mit Deiner Arbeitsweise einer Direktive folgst. Organisierte Mapping Aktivitäten erfordern eine besondere Beobachtung, da solche einen großen Einfluss auf unser Projekt haben. Grüße Johann
freebeer (2018-12-01 14:19:18+00:00): Translation into english:  SHAPE UP OR GET THE FECK OUT.

This is no way to address a community member; if you have a legit beef then let the DWG handle it rather than making repeated threats over the past weeks.

And this for the minor sin of tracing roof outlines from available legal imagery, which appears to be common worldwide for obvious reasons.

Divert your anger to the HOT mappers whose buildings barely match reality, and by comparison a roof outline unless done to HOT standards in austria is hardly worth ruffling feathers about, much less frothing at the mouth.  Or to maps.me users who get amenity categories totally wrong or place multiple nodes for the same amenity, none near the actual location.

I hardly see adding missing buildings as suspicious of an unspoken sponsored agenda as who benefits?  The competition?  Hardly.  Commercial organised mappers who have gotten involved with OSM seem to be entirely concerned with the road network - telenav, lyft, amazon, microsoft to name a few, or mapbox and their outsourcers, with other interests, to name a few I am familiar with.

Enough from my side.  It gets tedious to repeatedly read these repetitive and increasingly rabid rants about a trivial violation of the wiki guidelines, and demands to leave, like above, are the sort of de-motivation that OSM can do without for non-vandalism.

By the way, I have exclusively drawn roof outlines in my mapping, even when I got a view through a Dachfenster in hurricane country that the roof overlapped the actual building by 1,6 metres.  Your tone is like threatening the banhammer if someone fails to square their outlines, for which Frans S among others can be seen politely chastising HOT mappers on a regular basis, never escalating.
Gppes (2018-12-02 12:06:05+00:00): Saetze wie dieser "Deine Arbeitsweise OpenStreetMap nachhaltig. Ich fordere Dich daher auf, entweder deine schädliche Arbeitsweise einzustellen, oder unser Projekt zu verlassen. " gehen einfach ueberhaupt nicht. Bitte beim Umgangston aufpassen!!!
user_1470980 (2018-12-02 13:21:09+00:00): Hallo freebeer, entschuldige meine überspitzte Reaktion. Danke für den Einblick in Deine Arbeit im Umgang mit HOT. Dort hat man es sicher mit vielen Volunteer Mappern zu tun, Mapper die vermutlich jeweils nur kurz an unserem Projekt mitarbeiten. Qualität Sicherung in Bezug auf HOT ist daher wohl  mit einem Kampf gegen Windmühlen vergleichbar. Ich denke, dass Dir in Regionen wo Du selbst Dachflächen ergänzt hast, niemals so hoch qualitative Luftbilder wie uns in Österreich zur Verfügung standen. Mich beschäftigt in Österreich das Verhalten professioneller User, welche trotz sehr hochwertige Luftbilder und tausenden eingebrachten Gebäuden beständig nur minderwertige Arbeit einbringen, und hierzu auch auf keinen Kommentar reagieren. Grüße Johann
freebeer (2018-12-02 22:37:18+00:00): Grüezi Johann,
Just to make it clear to all, i should have written
``Summary of the last sentence above, translated into raw english:''  usw

This was *not* directed at you or to anyone, but was meant to alert non-german-speaking readers or others who might have dismissed this changeset commentary.

If it came across to you or to anyone else differently, please accept my apologies.  i only re-read what i wrote once, making it twice as long, and posted hurriedly in an attempt not to re-read again and make it three times as long.

Also, for clarity, i am in no way related with HOT or any other organised mapping.  i am a volunteer, and have never been paid or otherwise compensated (other than being in the community, and using osm on my garmin) for my mapping, not that it matters.  i have expanded my quality checking to include most countries of the world in a small way, all with their own issues, to take the place of the active mapping i used to do.

The areas i have added typically have had Bing aerials at zoomlevel 20, distorted to make it appear one is directly above all buildings or looking down chimneys.  Also Mapbox, with slightly better resolution if degraded now, and the range of ESRI coverage up to native zoomlevel 22 (23?) where mapping individual small asphalt roof tiles is possible.  That probably corresponds to the Kanton Basel-Land 10cm imagery i also used.  I have been unable to find out the native resolution of the different imageries listed, aside from BL.

I understand how frustrating it is, when editors default to the new Bing imagery with up to 10m offset and with a native zoomlevel of something like 17 if not worse, totally unsuited for mapping details and offering no incentive to new mappers to add quality.

In my limited mapping of austria, i was not that impressed with the aerial imageries, but that may because my editor does not support WMS services directly.

Reading the raw editor-layer-index source in hopes of getting a clue, i find nothing for the tiris orthophotos, and for Wien i see max-zoom of 19, which is the point where i would not even try to map accurately.  the same z19 applies to the basemap.at ortho images.  even z20 Bing looks tiny after i have a house almost filling my screen from esri somewhere in florida, i believe, or connecticut, in the usa.

Ah, VoGIS offers 10cm im Ländle, i'd be happy mapping from that.  that is the standard i expect, or better (5cm).

there really is no reason for me to write all this, other than dispel the misconceptions you or others may have of me as you have expressed above.

i hope to have clarified things.

carry on.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:21:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
GOwin (2018-12-05 03:26:13+00:00): Please avoid using the `hamlet` tag to add names near features. Add the name direclty to the features themselves, if necessary.

Hamlet tag are used for small settlements.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
literan (2018-12-01 18:59:33+00:00): Добрый день. Подскажите ,вы эти названия сами придумали?
_And_ (2018-12-02 05:22:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. "Центральная" всем местным известна под таким названием. "Рябиновая" -- все, знающие лес, понимают о чём речь. "Весёлую" почему-то так зовут полтора десятка велосипедистов (по участку в Страве). Также использовал несколько устоявшихся в кругу семьи названий.
literan (2018-12-02 09:30:52+00:00): тогда я перенесу это в тег loc_name
Jakka (2018-12-01 13:20:09+00:00): cette exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345065461 mieux utiliser/comparer avec image picc ns dessinons le contact avec le sol Les image pur aérienne donne impressions fautive. Vos changer "building=house" en "building=yes" pas de maison ?
Jakka (2018-12-01 13:22:14+00:00): Celui ci vous prenez le parking avec...345065459, v3
BCNorwich (2018-12-01 14:41:12+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to point out that the war memorial is already mapped (Node: 365776926  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/365776926). Thus your new node is duplication and ought therefore be removed.

I've now added a description, inscription and website.

Regards Bernard.
aboutDereham (2018-12-01 15:21:05+00:00): Thanks Bernard - this view you referred me to is a much better view than the one I was trying to edit when it appeared that it said "grass area" and nothing else. Thanks for the correction.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
DaveF (2018-12-15 17:29:22+00:00): Hi
If areas such as residential ones, don't include an inner area they shouldn't be added to a relation but mapped as normal polygons.
Supaplex (2019-02-06 16:08:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Mazda05 (2018-12-04 12:04:34+00:00): прокуратура на Кулиева 16
juminet (2018-12-11 20:15:47+00:00): Bonjour Cyril Roucoux, 

Bienvenue sur OSM! Je vois que vous avez nommé plusieurs maisons en "maison". Ce n'est pas nécessaire et plutôt déconseillé par la communauté. Le tag "name" est requis lorsque la maison a vraiment un nom, ce qui est plutôt rare. Eviter aussi de mettre des infos privées dans OSM (par ex. Roucoux House), les données sont reprises au travers de centaines d'applications.

Happy mapping!

juminet
zors1843 (2018-12-01 13:27:19+00:00): Hi,
Please do not enlarge a building with the surroundings (garden, swimming pool,...)
Kind regards
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
zors1843 (2018-12-01 17:32:33+00:00): You changed an administrative boundary into a river.  I corrected it.
GOwin (2018-12-05 01:55:42+00:00): Maayo!

You seem to be particularly interested in local schools, would you need any more assistance on this?

Ideally, changeset comments should describe the changes you made so that future editors can understand your edits better.

You need to tag the grounds as a school, and not as a separate node/point.

Buildings normally has squared corners, while yours edits try to follow the rooftop shapes, hence the angular sides.  When mapping buildings, what we're really after are building footprints, and tracing rooftops allow us to, more or less, determine that.

I'll modify this changeset and you can review it yourself, to see how we conventionally do it.

If you have questions, or concerns, please do not hesitate to task. We have various channels you can try if you have questions, or wish to know more local mappers: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/PH/channels
GOwin (2018-12-05 01:59:54+00:00): ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5821688/49485045-4443f800-f874-11e8-9cc5-8366ac4a67fd.png)

This image shows how "squared" buildings should look like. The two buildings you did earlier (red outline) still show the angular edge where you traced the rooftops, which we don't usually trace as-is.
Chetan_Gowda (2018-12-02 12:46:48+00:00): Hi Thanks for contributing to OSM. 

There are lots of roads added, changed existing road names and also added large building like one here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651518621. Your changeset comment "pwd road" doesn't sense a lot. Can you bit more elaborative? 

Thanks!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
iz11 (2018-12-08 11:29:16+00:00): Szia!
A Szentendrei-Duna‬ multipolygonja eltűnt a térképekről.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/187129/history
A waterway=river tag nem jó ide, az eredeti waterway=riverbank volt a helyes.
zsolt d (2018-12-08 13:52:53+00:00): Köszönöm a segítséget. Valamit jól elrontottam... Most végigmentem a Szenendrei-Duna ág összes síkidom-vízfelületén, és mindet waterway=riverbank -ra állítottam. Kérlek, nézz rá! Így most jó lett?
iz11 (2018-12-08 22:06:32+00:00): A hibát javítottad, de szerintem csináltál felesleges dolgokat.
Elég lett volna csak egy tag-et módosítani a fent is belinkelt multipolygonon.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/187129/history
A waterway=river helyett waterway=riverbank, már jó.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank
A folyókat felületként multipolygononnal ábrázolni két módszer van:
1. csak waterway=riverbank 
2. natural=water és water=river együtt 
Mind a 3 tag-et egyszerre használni felesleges, de nem okoz hibát a térképeken, pl:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/186277/history

Mai, szerintem felesleges módosításaid, (csak 1-1 példa, légy szíves az összeset keresd meg te): 

Szentendrei-Duna‬
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/187129/history
megjavult, de natural=water így már nem kell

Ma a Duna fő ágát is módosítottad:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/186286/history
Most 3 tag van egyszerre.

Ezekre a vonalakra semmilyen tag nem kell, multipolygon részei, ott elég taggelni.
Tudom, daModdin kezdte el 6 hónapja.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207590286/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386935967/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593037437/history
iz11 (2018-12-09 01:02:39+00:00): Új szigeteket is hoztál létre, néhány példa:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653558802
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653558803
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653558804
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653558805
Mindet bele kéne tenni a Duna helyi multipolygonjába, inner szerepekben.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples
iz11 (2018-12-09 02:31:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/187129
A boat, canoe, motorboat, ship korlátozásokat nem itt kell megadni.

„Restrictions go on the central way tagged with waterway=river.”
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=riverbank?uselang=en
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].