piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
StefanHRT (2022-04-09 14:29:12+00:00): Hey geozeisig, an dem cycleway wird sich nichts ändern, hatte auch cycleway zu path geändert was jetzt wieder cycleway ist. Obendrein werden cycleways definiert, die nicht einmal eine Radfreigabe haben (und Fürstenwalde arbeitet nun einmal offensichtlich mit Beschilderungen und Radfreigaben). Schade um das Radrouting was so nicht wirklich gegeben ist. VG
eggie (2021-12-05 07:42:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:11:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114618626 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with fantasy names and locations.
ivanbranco (2021-12-05 08:38:18+00:00): Hi JuanMelo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009138049

with this way and many more you added a lot of invalid tags, can you fix it?
user_5359 (2021-12-06 07:06:51+00:00): for all the other ways with the same keys see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1dNZ
JuanMelo (2021-12-06 23:34:16+00:00): hello, thanks for informing me. I have fixed the Tags. Please if you find more, do not doubt to let me know to make the modifications
canfe (2022-01-07 18:29:53+00:00): Il formato telefonico deve rispettare le regole di formattazione
notmyproblem1 (2025-05-31 09:29:39+00:00): Ciao! La colonnina di ricarica vicino Via Mario Morbiducci. ( nodo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9310961829/history ) non è esistente.
E' stata verificata da un altro utente, guarda immagini:
https://gotofiokoly.vercel.app/9.png

perfavore, prossima volta controlla sul campo, grazie :)))
jeawrong (2025-06-01 13:59:52+00:00): Lo so, avevo sbagliato posizione e stavo tentando di rimuoverla qualche giorno fa, poi distratto da altro.
attili1 (2021-12-06 09:09:11+00:00): Hi lingkungan18nadyana,

Trust you are doing well and welcome to OpenStreetMap. While mapping in Indonesia we observed that you have added a lot of building polygons which does not seem to reflect on the ground reality and should be avoided mapping on OpenStreetMap. We are reverting these changesets and please do not hesitate to reach out to us for any questions.

We know it’s often scary for a beginner to map in OSM, please visit the OSM beginner’s guide/learnOSM to learn best mapping practices. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide , https://learnosm.org/ or reach out to us for more questions. 

Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114562327
user_5359 (2021-12-06 07:12:34+00:00): Hallo! kleiner Hinweis: Die Geschwindigkeit kommt beim conditional maxspeed nicht in den Schlüssel.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:10:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114618626 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with fantasy names and locations.
literan (2021-12-05 16:57:09+00:00): и к чему это удаление части тегов без обоснования? верну пока
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-07 09:31:28+00:00): Ciao Luca, per le piazzole dell'elisoccorso dovresti usare emergency=landing_site: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it-piemonte/2019-August/000976.html Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114562796
voiden (2022-04-09 10:36:03+00:00): hei, setter utrolig stor pris på alle bidragene dine i bergensområdet. men jeg har litt kritikk mot disse endringene, helt konkret angående fortauene du har tegnet inn. 

det ser ikke ut som du har lagt inn fotgjengeroverganger, som betyr at ruteforslagene i reiseplanleggere blir helt feil. har selv opplevd dette når jeg har brukt entur i sentrum. om du ikke legger inn fotgjengeroverganger samtidig som fortauene er det faktisk bedre å la være. husk at vi lager et *nettverk* av veier. 

i tillegg ville det vært å foretrekke om du i tillegg til highway=footway tagget footway=sidewalk, men det er bare pirk. 

hilsen Vemund
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114562971
user_5359 (2021-12-05 15:09:25+00:00): Hello! Please check the position of the moved address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7143040948/history ! 

I remove your duplicate cinema entry (see ttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762397652)
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:31:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5497
user_11418917 (2021-12-15 08:50:49+00:00): Thank you! keep up the good work!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114563394
JhowieNitnek (2022-01-30 11:03:50+00:00): The image link doesn't work
Thierry1030 (2022-01-30 20:00:08+00:00): ok thx for mentioning. I will try to make a new picture in the coming days ...
arkriger (2022-01-10 21:04:53+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. 

The boundary=administrative -> Relation: Tshwane Ward 82 and Relation: Tshwane Ward 56 seems incorrect. These areas (polygons) are missing parts and appear broken.
SomeoneElse (2022-01-14 10:40:35+00:00): Hello,
I've extended https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268443105 back to it's previous length and re-added it to the two administrative areas https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3598544/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3598573/history , so they're now the same size and shape as they were before.
Thanks,
Andy
DD1GJ (2021-12-05 00:33:56+00:00): revert 114565051 114564953 114429683 114346743 114346652 114346523 , vandalism

Hallo Ralf Walgern,
da Du einige umstrittene Sachen mit Kommentaren in exotischen Sprachen gelöscht hast, habe ich alle Deine Änderungen komplett rückgängig gemacht. Die Commumity bespricht problematische Wege gerne offen mit mit Naturschutzbehörden, aber nicht mit anonymen Vandalen.
gscscnd (2021-12-04 21:19:50+00:00): Wartość tagu construction powinno odpowiadać docelowej wartości tagu highway, zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction>. Poprawiłem w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114566505>.
RaccoonFederation (2021-12-05 02:00:47+00:00): There are some duplicate Nodes in this changeset due to OSM Go! crashing during upload. I haven't sorted this out yet
RaccoonFederation (2021-12-07 10:10:17+00:00): Should be sorted now. Have manually removed duplicate nodes with changeset #114653220
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-12-04 20:26:19+00:00): This is a unilateral change, and the local communities have not fully agreed on it
user_11418917 (2021-12-04 21:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114566084 where the changeset comment is: Please do not unilaterally change or remove the names of this water body without prior discussion with the local communities and the DMG. This matter was already discussed before, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-June/086605.html
Ebrahim Nejati (2021-12-04 21:34:56+00:00): I don't know how you decided that my changeset was done without prior discussion? Have you even seen the provided link?

I am the person who created the thread you quoted "see". Is there anyone here willing to discuss the matter at all?
user_11418917 (2021-12-04 22:07:18+00:00): Hello Ebrahim Nejati,                         
When you send an email to the talk you should wait for a reply, you can not just say "if no one reply I will change it myself" no, this is not how it's done! you should wait for all communities to participate in the discussion if your point was valid. A matter in this size and scale should take time to discuss, you can't just change the name in few days if no one replied to your email. The DMG was clear with their message that the name should not unilaterally be changed.    
I can see that you have opened this case twice in the talk\mailing list, the first one concluded to leave the name in or have an A\B option, which all the Arabs from the 7 countries sourounding the Gulf accepted alongside with the DMG, while you never replied and abandoned the discussion.                                 
Therefore the name should not be unilaterally change or remove without prior discussion with the local communities and the DMG.                  
Best Regards.
woodpeck (2021-12-05 00:49:02+00:00): Yes, the matter was not given sufficient time. Also, "Recently OSM carto tiles has been blocked in Iran by certain ISPs" (quote from mailing list article) should never be a reason for any change in OSM because we cannot let national ISPs decide what to show on our maps.
Ebrahim Nejati (2021-12-05 07:49:23+00:00): What is the sufficient time and how could it be determined? I thought (and wrote in the thread) that exactly one week would be sufficient.

Also, does DWG have any take on this issue? I'm asking this from day 1 and still couldn't get a clear answer. 

Since when the current tagging has become the bilateral and de facto?

As far as I remember (and anyone can check) lockdownguy changed it from Persian to Arabian gulf without any prior discussion anywhere.
kapazao (2021-12-06 15:06:50+00:00): Ten cuidado con los cambios que hace en los cruces peatonales. Trata de simplemente mover los elementos y no borrar y crear de nuevo, que se pierde histórico y es absurdo.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114565478
Pipeton (2021-12-07 12:48:42+00:00): Los estaba intentando conservar, pero se ve que id no destruye el nodo y lo vuelve a crear si le das a extraer. A la próxima pruebo de alguna otra manera a ver si así sí se conserva.
maraf24 (2022-06-20 16:56:14+00:00): Hej
Coś się w tej sprawie zmieniło, bo Robotnikmajowy właśnie zmienił na S17 i trunk?
szalona_entropia (2022-06-20 19:57:32+00:00): Nic się nie zmieniło
marczoutendijk (2021-12-05 10:25:58+00:00): BH? What does that mean?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
st6132 (2021-12-05 14:48:37+00:00): Apologies. Thanks for sharing - will use in future mapping. Btw "BH"I've been using the same tag for all edits made to the Ballyhack Golf Club.  All of last nights edits were focussed on the fairways and bunker placements, ensuring they accurately match up with the sat images from bing. 
I use OSM data combined with lidar files to recreate golf courses for a PC golf sim game.
hatul (2022-03-10 10:37:04+00:00): למה השביל בין צפית לתמר הוא highway=track? אין שום רכב שיכול לנסוע שם.
zstadler (2022-03-10 15:01:35+00:00): החלקים שמסומנים כ track, הם אכן כך
hatul (2022-03-10 15:10:17+00:00): הם אומנם קצת רחבים אבל אין לשם גישה לרכב.
zstadler (2022-03-10 20:53:09+00:00): וזה מה שהמפה אומרת
Mashin (2021-12-05 04:03:51+00:00): Thanks for finishing the trail. 
Just a small thing, paths and roads should not be drawn on top of each other. If a path meets a road, that is the place where the path ends.

I fixed the two overlaps so all is good.
Mashin (2021-12-05 03:32:28+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for the edits. Though no need to add trail name on paths. It is already included in hiking route relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11974625
user_2066394 (2021-12-04 22:44:02+00:00): Waren das Wildkameras im Wald drin?
Roman Wilder (2021-12-05 07:28:31+00:00): Ja
HellMap (2024-06-21 21:17:28+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure there are culverts here like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009171133 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009171135 ?
HellMap (2024-07-02 18:29:34+00:00): Did not receive a reply from you, so I have removed these culverts.
LuxuryCoop (2021-12-04 23:57:50+00:00): source 태그의 링크에 접속할 수 없어 여기에 수정한 링크를 적어 둡니다.
https://www.data.go.kr/en/data/15067528/fileData.do
https://www.data.go.kr/en/data/3053832/fileData.do

첫 번째 출처는 국토교통부 자료이지만, 확인 결과 국토교통부에서 '측량'한 데이터가 아니라 각 지방자치단체의 데이터를 단순히 가져온 거라 국외 반출에 걸리지 않을 듯합니다.
기여해 주셔서 항상 감사드립니다.
LuxuryCoop (2021-12-05 00:34:31+00:00): +다만 혹시 모를 법적 문제가 있을 수도 있어서 저는 지방자치단체에서 직접 배포하는 데이터를 import합니다.
user_5359 (2021-12-05 14:34:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the booth relation! A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways).
DRTBYK (2021-12-05 18:25:28+00:00): Thanks for checking this for me. I "think" I've fixed the relationships now but would like another check. 

P.S, The Satellite imagery is old and does not show the lane barrier.
wireguy (2022-03-03 12:02:35+00:00): La Chaussiere, your source says Google.  You are not permitted to use copywritten maps as a source.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
The relation is also not passing josms validation checks.  It was not created correctly.  Please revert the changes.
philippec (2021-12-10 15:16:22+00:00): Schiplaken Hellebrug, wat achtergrond 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.982708100001&lng=4.5472896&z=17&pKey=620475532730312&focus=photo&dateFrom=2021-12-08&dateTo=2021-12-08
mini-me (2021-12-05 18:31:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1406106722
Это не название памятника, а надпись (inscription)
Ser9ei (2021-12-06 07:25:24+00:00): Что именно? Я просто добавил перевод. Если знаете название, то исправьте.
maraf24 (2022-01-16 17:28:10+00:00): Proszę nie rysować pasów na jezdni jako osobnych dróg.
maraf24 (2022-01-16 17:29:08+00:00): Zmiany wycofałem, zostały zrobione na podstawie nieaktualnych zdjęć.
Jeroen Fokker (2022-05-27 08:38:46+00:00): Obwohl die 65kV Valgrid Hochspannungsleitung noch sichtbar ist auf die Swissimage Luftbilder, wurde sie schon im 2020 rückgebaut. Ich habe daher die Strecke Ernen-Ulrichen nun wieder vom OSM entfernt, und den Anschluss ans Netzwerk bei Ernen nun entwas präziser in der Realität verkennt und dementsprechend eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121561612
mmayiiknyok (2024-10-23 15:44:25+00:00): This road that I mentioned above it's inside the boarder of Abiemnom lands, so suppose to be like that Abiemnom - Miyom road and not Ajackuc - Miyom road as you wrote.
Emilius123 (2021-12-06 23:06:29+00:00): bro, this city real?
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-06 23:09:26+00:00): Please stop this vandalism immediately.  The Data Working Group has been notified.
user_5359 (2021-12-06 07:09:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009186954: What is the meaning of the tags
Code =Town TillA
DisplayOnT=yes
GISID=257001
OBJECTID=9754
What is the license of this information?
maraf24 (2022-01-16 17:55:16+00:00): Tydzień przed czasem.
Akkurator (2022-02-17 17:29:00+00:00): Hallo m-gu-b,

du hast hier für einen ganzen Satz von Straßen das Tag operator=RAB gesetzt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:operator

Meines Wissens ist die RAB aber nicht Betreiber dieser Straßen. Sie baut sie nicht, unterhält sie nicht, räumt sie nicht, etc.
Das sind gewöhnliche öffentliche Straßen und die RAB ist nur ein Nutzer von vielen.

Wie siehst du das?

Grüße,
Akkurator
Akkurator (2022-02-21 22:59:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117703885
Akkurator (2022-02-22 15:25:40+00:00): und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117732416
Endres Pelka (2024-05-07 17:33:50+00:00): Zrewertowane w 151021386.
MxxCon (2021-12-05 04:10:13+00:00): Hello.
Could you please write more descriptive changeset comments? "ECCC" doesn't help anybody understand what you are editing.
Please see this article for more detailed explanation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 👍
grelus (2022-07-11 08:05:52+00:00): Czy to prawidłowa lokalizacja? Wygląda jak kopia kościoła w centrum miasteczka.
JayMontana36 (2021-12-05 00:03:45+00:00): Correction - 3550 Conner Street, McDonald's
user_5359 (2021-12-06 07:02:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009191397/history. Is this correction of the typo correct (see tle leading 19)?
sannkc (2021-12-07 18:19:24+00:00): Yes, it is.  Thanks!
jcarlson (2021-12-28 03:00:52+00:00): Nice to see all the lane attributes getting added, but are you by chance loading the features w/ an Overpass query? I ask because a bunch of route relations whose member ways you edited got broken, and I have done that very same thing with lane tagging and sparse editing in JOSM.
There's a way to modify your query to tell it to "recurse up relations" and get any relations that the downloaded features belong to, which would avoid this sort of thing.
jcarlson (2021-12-28 03:02:14+00:00): It's possible they were broken before you got to them, too, I didn't do a deep dive on the history. It just seemed similar to something I did in the past.
Mundilfari (2021-12-28 10:24:10+00:00): Hey there - any route relation in particular you have in mind? If you have an example I'll be more than happy to look into what happened.
I fixed the 59 relation which was quite messed up, but didn't review all other relations that may have shared points/segments with 59.
I still have some portions of IL59 left to lane-tag (further north); and I'm planning on doing the same thing for all IL state highways, including reviewing the relations themselves (I only did a handful of the shorter state highways so far, it can be quite tedious).

I'm not sparse editing though, I usually just download rather narrow rectangles along the route, mostly because I want to see a couple feet left and right - to do the lane tags on the first couple of segments of the crossing roads at major intersections too, and also to do turn restrictions and traffic lights where possible (also, the machine I am typically working on is powerful enough for sparse queries to not be nexessary for these types of edits most of the time).
jcarlson (2021-12-28 13:25:16+00:00): US 30 and 34 had a bunch of issues. 30 is fixed now, though, and I'll probably work through 34 today.
Sounds like they were broken before you got to them, then. The curse of being the last modifier, I suppose.
MxxCon (2021-12-05 03:55:18+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? https://parks.ny.gov/parks/shirleychisholm/details.aspx says that this park has biking trails and they even offer bike rentals.. Is that not accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114569473
hdevine825 (2021-12-05 07:58:08+00:00): I was at the park several hours prior to making this edit and the signage on site for the trails edited indicates no bikes. The trail around the perimeter of this peninsula allows bikes.

I'm not sure about the other peninsula, it was closed before I got there.
maraf24 (2021-12-07 21:16:16+00:00): W takiej sytuacji wskazane byłoby przenieść adres z węzła na budynek. Cześć narzędzi wówczas autoamatycznie przypisze adres z budynku do POI.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-12-05 03:31:02+00:00): Please do not add fictional features to OpenStreetMap.
felipeeugenio (2021-12-05 12:10:57+00:00): Alonso. Como hemos conversado varias veces, por favor no agregar datos si no estás seguro. El tema de la cantidad de habitantes o es del INE o por favor no lo agregues.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114570191
salve100 (2021-12-05 13:49:24+00:00): elimine la cantidad de habitantes que habia puesto hace unos meses,pero de igual forma gracias
felipeeugenio (2021-12-05 14:59:44+00:00): Gracias Alonso por tu respuesta.
Saludos
WoodWoseWulf (2021-12-09 23:16:26+00:00): Hi!
You have this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009206345 marked as a house. It looks like it might be water?
RussNelson (2022-01-16 00:33:24+00:00): Yes. Obviously I was working on both houses and ponds. Thanks for catching an correcting this!
Supaplex (2021-12-05 04:22:21+00:00): 加添Wikidata
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114571321
catdreamer (2022-04-29 10:43:32+00:00): 在編輯上萱源山又名庫魯山，又另外標了一個庫魯山，似乎不合理
joviho (2022-05-01 02:20:42+00:00): 請詳看(所有回覆最後一則)多年前公案即知原由︰
一瓶酒，一個點，一張地圖--探訪庫魯山80年之謎
https://www.keepon.com.tw/thread-94a8bff1-0fd8-e411-93ec-000e04b74954.html
PolyDunami (2021-12-05 04:23:43+00:00): The border crossing for Point Roberts was updated to include all lanes crossing through border control. Further scrutiny may be needed for the sake of accuracy.
archpdx (2021-12-10 01:36:31+00:00): Hi,
It looks like you forgot to close this wood multipolygon in this changeset so I fixed it:
https://www.osm.org/relation/8548682
erikp (2021-12-05 15:40:19+00:00): Zäune, Bäume ... sehr detailreich. Respekt für den Aufwand!
erikp (2021-12-05 15:40:29+00:00): gilt auch für die anderen edits
StefanHRT (2021-12-05 16:04:17+00:00): Danke, ich werte nach und nach meine 360°-Fotos in der Gegend aus ;)
Allison P (2021-12-05 06:55:16+00:00): Haha, yeah... when I first joined OSM parking lots were the primary thing I mapped. If you look at some of my old changeset comments, you can see me lose my innocence, hope, and will to live, in that order.
h551w (2021-12-05 07:25:08+00:00): And it looks like I'm well on my way to following along. There's still that slight hope that I must be operating on where maybe this will help people realize just how much parking they're drowning in, but an unfortunately more likely outcome of all this is probably just going to be a few Tesla owners who are slightly happier their car's summoning feature works slightly better :/
rab (2021-12-05 13:06:55+00:00): You have ingnored a lot of warnings before uploading :(
Rapid is not a tool for beginners.
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:01:49+00:00): Hello.
Please pay attention to square each rectangular building.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114573848
SomeoneElse (2021-12-06 09:22:16+00:00): Thanks - it's looking a lot more complete now!
I'm guessing the small gap at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1230368#map=18/53.34428/-1.32571 could also be added?
Cheers,
Andy
John Stanworth (2021-12-06 12:26:18+00:00): :) Well spotted Andy. Thanks. I’ll put it in now. Need to go and have a walk around the bit where it goes round Meadowhall before I can finish off the last corner. Thanks again. J
SomeoneElse (2021-12-06 17:58:23+00:00): Great - thanks!
eggie (2021-12-05 09:06:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  In OSM taggen we bij op de adresnodes. 
Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek. Nr 24 is een eindje verder. Dit is pand nr 22E
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-05 09:43:00+00:00): Alle info verplaatst naar adresnode 24
mvg
eggie
Ebrahim Nejati (2022-01-14 16:18:23+00:00): با سلام
دوست عزیز لطفا اطلاعات شخصی را وارد نقشه نکنید.
با تشکر
WoodWoseWulf (2021-12-09 23:15:19+00:00): Hi!
You have this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009244668/ marked as a canal. Is that correct? Looks like it might be farmland like the surrounding areas?
λnko (2021-12-05 09:48:06+00:00): 请注意！此道路在规划中为次要道路，所以不根据“S296”设为主要道路
Frans S (2021-12-08 15:00:09+00:00): Hello.
See my previous comments about accurate mapping and squaring of the buildings you mapped.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114576347
abrensch (2022-02-11 16:10:23+00:00): Diese Oneway-Abschnitte östlich der Brücke sind Absicht oder nur übersehen?

Gruss, Arndt
ma-rt-in (2022-02-12 09:35:46+00:00): Moin,

tatsächlich vergessen. Ist angepasst.

vg
woodpeck_repair (2021-12-05 10:53:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114577629 where the changeset comment is: Please do not fiddle with any of the name tags of the Arabian/Persian Gulf. If you feel a change is necessary, discuss on the talk list. DWG will then execute the change when a consensus has been reached.