piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2020-09-30 18:28:14+00:00): That road clearly exists and is marked as private. In OSM we believe in adding verifiable features. This road appears to be such a feature. I reverted your deletion. 

If you can document the road doesn't exist anymore then it can be removed. 

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91733182
pio2_122 (2020-09-30 18:08:32+00:00): Już pisałem o tym, że obręby ewidencyjne to nie do końca granice miejscowości.
Tu dowód, że to nie tylko moje zdanie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2339710

Tych zmian nie będę jeszcze wycofywał, jednak w przypadku kolejnych gmin będę zmuszony takie edycje wycofywać. Nie chcę tu niczym straszyć, jednak nie będę miał innego wyboru. Jak wyżej wspomniałem nie jest to moje widzimisię - jeśli obręby ewidencyjne byłyby identyczne z granicami miejscowości import tych danych dla całej Polski byłby już dawno zaplanowany/zrobiony (wcześniej podałem wypowiedź jednego usera na ten temat)...
syntex (2020-09-30 19:03:09+00:00): Ale to w takim razie kto zna te mityczne "prawdziwe granice miejscowości" ?
pio2_122 (2020-09-30 19:04:51+00:00): Jest na to odpowiedź w wyżej podlinkowanej uwadze: "Generalnie wsie jako takie nie mają prawdziwych granic administracyjnych (tj. traktowanych tak jak granice gmin, powiatów, województw).

https://www.prawo.pl/samorzad/granice-administracyjne-wsi,77193.html"
syntex (2020-09-30 19:07:41+00:00): Działając tą logiką, powinno się wszystkie takie granice z osm usunąć co dla mnie jest absurdalne. To w takim razie część może mieć dodane a reszta nie?
pio2_122 (2020-09-30 19:27:43+00:00): I znów cytat z tamtej uwagi: "Znajdziesz wiele gmin w Polsce, gdzie nie ma szczegółowych granic, nie sądzę żeby był to błąd. Kiedyś (zgodnie z powyższym artykułem) ludzie rysowali granice wsi z EMUiA na podstawie okręgów ewidencyjnych, ale nie wiem na ile są one wiarygodne i sensowne." (@RicoElectrico)

Podpinając się do ww. wypowiedzi uważam, że nie należy dodawać nowych granic w ten sposób. A w przypadku już dodanych granic, trudno określić, czy są "wiarygodne i sensowne" - stąd, według mnie, usunięcie takich granic nie jest w cale absurdalne; to przebiegi niektórych z tych granic są kompletnie oderwane od rzeczywistości... Inną opcją jest też weryfikacja, czy wszystkie adresy pokrywają się z obrębami ewidencyjnymi - wtedy sądzę, że takie granice można by warunkowo zostawić.

Podsumowując: wcześniej dodanych granic nie można uznać za prawidłowe i oficjalne granice miejscowości. Nie zauważyłem, aby było ustalone jakieś jednolite stanowisko w stosunku do nich - stąd na razie nikt ich nie rusza... Z pewnością, nie warto mnożyć takich przypadków przez dodawanie nowych pseudo granic - to akurat było uzgodnione na forum.
syntex (2020-10-06 18:41:12+00:00): masz link do tej dyskusji na forum?
pio2_122 (2020-10-06 18:42:15+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=776390#p776390
syntex (2020-10-06 18:49:47+00:00): No tak, ale tu jest mowa jedynie o imporcie danych z EMUiA. Ale przecież prawnie te granice nie istnieją, to czego to ma być import? I jeśli oni je znają to dlaczego nikt poza nimi nie wie jakie są te granice? I dlaczego nikt nie ma do nich dostępu?
Dimacn (2020-09-30 05:46:49+00:00): При редактировании вы не соединили дворовые проезды в точке https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7956533780
Cebderby (2020-09-30 00:43:04+00:00): Can you reverse the false connection at node 5613999532, it was very carefully set as connecting the bridge and elevated ways to the lifts and NOT the platforms.
Also the reason that plat 7 track was set as siding was that no passenger services ever stop there (unless something has changed)
regards Cebderby (Clive)
Rovastar (2020-09-30 01:00:10+00:00): Oh i didn't realise that there was a platform running throughout. I'm sure I have seen at some point trains going from plat 7 track. I don't think they were frequent but some.
ma-rt-in (2020-10-02 06:45:23+00:00): Hallo,
wie kommst du darauf, das an den Weg ein Zeichen 260 => motor_vehicle=no steht?
Vor Ort warst du scheinbar ja nicht.
vg
Majofan (2020-10-02 07:10:14+00:00): Hallo,
Ich habe das wohl verwechselt mit dem Zeichen 255, das steht ja an jedem Eingang der Sandwege.
Ich ändere das gleich
VG
ma-rt-in (2020-10-03 11:57:31+00:00): Zeichen 255? Was steht den wirklich an diesen Wegen?
ralley (2020-12-11 03:15:21+00:00): The restaurant exists already, you may have been using an old map
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91733907
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
opencarpatia (2020-12-31 00:41:24+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution. However, please do not waste your time fixing waterways in Ukraine if they are imported by VARVAR8. He did this without confirmation with community. In current example, if you just have a look at aerial Maxar image - you'll clearly see there are no waterway here at all, and it is marked as going over buildings & backyards:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=829301092#map=19/49.23029/23.18066
B_KSL (2020-12-31 03:30:25+00:00): Hi. Yes I have noticed. At that time I corrected waterways on the Polish side and on the occasion also in neighboring areas of Slovakia and Ukraine. Some errors at the border were the result of not very good imports from Polish colleagues. Mostly simple technical errors. So I have "corrected" some non-existent streams, often without even looking at the pictures. When I noticed some "interesting inventions" (like streams flowing in circles and other you mention), I gave up. However, you will find some other things I have touched, like broken relations, intersecting lines or areas. As mentioned, just technical issues, with no try to check for reality. Great that you delete nonexistent one and improve other errors. It seems to be cleaner in the area
opencarpatia (2020-12-31 21:17:16+00:00): Hi, thanks again for help. All that warnings & issues have to be finally resolved *somehow*, but different options are available. I just didn't want you to spent time on wasted items. Right now I am ignoring everything from this user b.c personally don't see the way how to get rid of listed issues without total rollback & proper re-import (if any).

The biggest problem though is that now end users can not trust to the waterways data. And obviously mapping of new objects is an issue.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:30:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
michaedz (2020-09-30 02:51:50+00:00): Apologies for using internal terminology on OSM, the correct comment for the changeset is "Added driveways from Sexton Road and Orchard Avenue".
Warin61 (2026-03-04 04:33:05+00:00): Hi,
Why have you marked Charters Towers Aerodrome as military? 
It was constructed for military purposes .. but now? 
Looks like it is controlled by hte local council - they collect landing fees & charges... 
https://www.charterstowers.qld.gov.au/Services/Facilities-and-services/Airports-airstrips
Cebderby (2020-10-02 13:01:58+00:00): Area of woodland deleted on west side of southern lake.  Was this intentional? Are you going to replace these deletions?
DD1GJ (2020-09-30 06:48:16+00:00): Hallo fleisswolf,

danke fürs Mitmachen aber der Jugendclub ist bereits seit einen halben Jahr vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7370129986/history

MAPS.ME ist leider nur eingeschränkt für OSM-Eintragungen geeignet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Cebderby (2020-10-02 12:58:31+00:00): In this changeset you deleted a significant area of woodland and also dragged/merged a node marking the square part of the car park in to a triangle, please revisit and correct these matters, and use meaningful changeset comments so that your edit intentions are understood
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
DerHexxer (2021-08-10 15:13:27+00:00): Dear ZeLonewolf,
why is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357470644/history straight in the river?
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-11 01:32:56+00:00): Hello and welcome again to OpenStreetMap!  This particular historic district is based on the former location of a mill which sat along that river.  Though I agree that putting it directly in the river is probably not the right location, so I've moved it a few meters south to where descriptions have the mill ruins.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
TheSwavu (2021-02-16 02:04:42+00:00): Hi,
Historic areas are protect class 22 not 5. If something is IUCN cat V in Australia they'd be listed on CAPAD, which neither of these are.

Thanks.
ZeLonewolf (2021-02-16 02:13:09+00:00): Great, thanks.  Is the Australian usage of protect_class documented somewhere?  I've been attempting to track and maintain global usage of protect_class on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:protect_class, and there isn't a lot of detail on Australia.  Some of the more obscure values like 22 aren't terribly widely used.
TheSwavu (2021-02-16 04:11:09+00:00): They are documented on the page you linked to. However I noticed that someone has replaced protect class 1 with 1a and 1b. These were never a thing and only appeared when people tagged incorrectly. 

In general AUS is no different to anywhere else. A conservation area managed to a IUCN Category is 1 through 6 (and we have permission to use a national dataset of these, so you can just look them up). If it's a conservation are without an IUCN Cat then 7. Historic areas 22. Catchment protection areas 12. Then the rest are pretty rare. There are some class 24 but a quick look suggests these are incorrectly tagged. Some no fishing areas tagged 14. And two "character preservation" districts in SA which are 29 because that's the closest class to what they do.

Everything in protect class 1 to 7 also gets a leisure=nature_reserve because....OSM
ZeLonewolf (2021-02-16 04:24:34+00:00): So there's actually no such thing as IUCN Category I -- there is only Ia and Ib -- protect_class=1 was an OSM invention.  Of course mappers simply used 1a and 1b if that's what the IUCN category was.  We've been working to slowly eliminate protect_class values outside of (1a,1b,2-6) in the United States and we've got pretty broad consensus here to replace them with plain English tagging.  We recently finished removing protect_class=27, for example, replacing it with an ownership= tag instead.  No-fishing areas tagged fishing=no, and so forth.  We felt that the plain English was more useful to everyone and that there was no point in a classification system that didn't have global meaning.  Anyways, happy to collaborate any time on protect_class issues, and if any more detailed information comes up on on Australia-specific usages, feel free to shoot it my way!
flohoff (2020-09-30 08:19:34+00:00): Moin,
ich hab gerade diese routingänderungen gesehen. Die sind dadurch verursacht das auf "Am Eichhof" jetzt ein "maxspeed=100" ist - Das ist rechtlich richtig - Nur - 100 fahren kann man da defakto nicht. Deshalb lasse _ich_ das auf den ganzen Wegen ausserorts die maxspeeds zu taggen. Das macht echt das routing kaputt weil die dann "vermeindlich" schneller werden. Zumindest ist das tagging so.

Ich hab da jetzt mal noch ein lanes=1 getagged um dem router zu sagen das das "schmal" ist - OSRM/OSMAnd halbieren dann die angenommene Geschwindigkeit. Vielleicht hilfts. Kriege in 2-3 Stunden dann eine neue Auswertung.

Grün ist alt - Rot ist neu. Nach OSRM kürzer und schneller geworden.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=84288,267222#51.79397,8.46788,13z
flohoff (2020-09-30 11:01:14+00:00): Hat geklappt - die routen sind zurück geschwenkt:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=267243,267372#51.78996,8.42293,16z
thetornado76 (2020-09-30 17:04:11+00:00): Dann scheint lanes=1 einen größeren Einfluss zu haben, als width=4.
Ok gut zu wissen.
flohoff (2020-10-01 08:23:44+00:00): Bei OSRM kommt das penalty im default car profile erst bei <= 3m 

  if width <= 3 or (lanes <= 1 and is_bidirectional) then
    width_penalty = 0.5
  end
canfe (2020-10-01 09:03:15+00:00): Ho notato che hai creato un po' di landuse ma che gli hai anche attribuito un nome.
Il nome va alla frazione o paese, non al landuse.
Il nome va sulla relazione che definisce il livello amministrativo (confini).
Se vuoi ti do una mano a correggere...
nevw (2020-09-30 09:01:30+00:00): Hi
wondering why you have deleted many of the tracks that were marked private in the National Parkbut left other private tracks untouched. They are very evident and obviously still used by NP and probably also by emergency services staff.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 14:01:15+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
WoodWoseWulf (2020-10-01 12:17:51+00:00): Hi Joseph!

Is this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853099020

Supposed to be a parking lot? At the moment you have it tagged as a grassy green park. 

You're also using a lot of capital letters, is that intentional?
calcium990 (2020-09-30 04:01:31+00:00): Please refer to official source at: http://parramattalightrail.nsw.gov.au/map/parramatta
Sosha1996 (2021-07-24 17:06:04+00:00): لطفا از قلم فارسی برای تگ‌های این مدلی استفاده نکنید.
Sosha1996 (2021-07-24 17:06:40+00:00): منظورم maxspeed ۹۰ هستش.
NM$L (2020-10-01 15:22:28+00:00): 加油
kenuser (2020-10-05 05:03:01+00:00): 謝謝
Supaplex (2021-04-16 14:01:48+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
abakus_uploader (2020-09-30 22:31:14+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Bert Araali (2021-03-06 19:08:38+00:00): Could you please use the correct tag for roads. It should be highway=*, not road=*. Are you part of a team making these edits in Sri Lanka ?
Regards, Bert Araali
Ruminda12 (2021-03-07 03:05:48+00:00): Hi
Thanks for the information i will correct it for sure .
thanks
ruminda
Bert Araali (2021-03-07 15:33:59+00:00): Thank you. Will be appreciated. Could you also engage the other members of your team to do the same ?
Endres Pelka (2020-10-16 14:38:32+00:00): Warum entfernen Sie public_transport=platform von den Bushaltestellen?
PT-53 (2020-09-30 06:18:49+00:00): Hallo vishlav,
Du hast diese Hauszufahrt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853183833/history
neu eingezeichnet und als Track klassifiziert. Das ist falsch. Hauszufahrten und auch die Straße bis zur Hauszufahrt sind mindestens vom Typ Service.
Bitte ändern.
Grüße
vishlav (2020-10-01 02:48:04+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. we have added the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853183833 as track since it is leading to the farm land and having similar pavement of the track road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127743337. We are happy to improvise our editing quality with the help of your local knowledge. We have changed the track to driveway, PFB changeset 91793856. Thanks for your valuable inputs and always happy to learn from the community
PT-53 (2020-10-01 06:14:00+00:00): Hallo vishlav, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Die Änderung dieser Hauszufahrt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853183833#map=19/48.09602/9.94389
ist in Ordnung.
Die Änderung / Anpassung dieses Weges
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127743337/history
 steht aber noch aus. Eine Hauszufahrt (Service) kann nicht an einen Feldweg (Track) angeschlossen werden. Dieser Weg muß aufgesplittet werden und das Stück von der Landstraße bis zum Hof auf Service hochgestuft werden. Der Rest des Weges bleibt Feldweg.
Grüße
vishlav (2020-10-01 06:48:06+00:00): Thanks for the response. PFB changeset 91804600 for the suggested modifications. I will make sure to incorporate your suggestions in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the community
PT-53 (2020-10-01 06:54:19+00:00): Hallo vishlav, 
ich habe diesen Wegabschnitt 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853617904/history
ebenfalls noch entspr. angepaßt.
Grüße
ququruzka (2020-10-01 16:58:53+00:00): cool ! good work!
user_11418917 (2020-09-30 18:22:53+00:00): Your change is wrong. This is a major highway called "سريع محمد القاسم"
It's motorway not primary road.
Here are some pictures: https://imgur.com/a/spLBoMz
Please revert your edit or fix it.
MurchisonPromontory (2020-10-01 04:12:50+00:00): Hi lockdownguy, I like your username! I didn't think it is a motorway because there are intersections where roads directly access the highway, for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831198679. According to OSM guidelines, motorways are only accessed by ramps: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway. I do see that it is a very important road. It seems like since its limited-access we should classify it as trunk. What do you think?
user_11418917 (2020-10-01 11:01:39+00:00): Hi There! 
Well this exit "https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831198679" is not official. before the war there was no exit here. you can still see it with google maps satellite since they still use old pictures: "https://www.google.com/maps/@33.3630479,44.3913166,120m/data=!3m1!1e3" 
Its the most important road the the east side of Baghdad. Speed limit is km/h (2nd fastest road in baghdad after the airport road which is 140km/h)
I didn't want to the remove the "unofficial exit" since its there and people are actually use it.
In the iraqi docs its called "طريق محمد القاسم السريع" which is "السريع" to "speed".
Honestly I don't know what to think about it.
lots of roads are classified wrong in Baghdad though. but about the one we are talk about its definitely a "motorway" according to my local knowledge, but if you see like it can't be done like that due to the unofficial exit, well the Trunk is the 2nd best thing.
Thank you!
MurchisonPromontory (2020-10-02 18:16:09+00:00): Thanks for updating the map with your local knowledge. I changed it to trunk since that fits the OSM guidelines a bit better with the unofficial exit. Thanks again, and don’t hesitate to reach out!
user_11418917 (2020-10-02 18:22:46+00:00): Thank you! Wish you all good and have a great day!
Bogomil Shopov - Бого (2025-10-02 06:00:25+00:00): the buildings should be areas, not points. Can you fix that please?
kirichkov (2025-10-02 09:02:56+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out. I'll get to work!
Larmax (2020-09-30 08:24:04+00:00): Tuo rakennus ja nuo polut tuskin ovat tuon muotoisia.
jaap de vries (2020-09-30 06:53:30+00:00): zie ook het bag terugmeldings bericht https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/#?geometry.x=201157.88204674&geometry.y=356631.82219062&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0957100000270846&objectId=0957100000305919&detailsObjectId=
HansWürstchen (2020-09-30 10:32:41+00:00): Hallo Urs
Prüfe doch bitte nochmal Deine Änderungen im Bereich Bastweg/Panoramaweg, Deine GPS-Daten scheinen in diesem Bereich sehr ungenau zu sein, dort gibt es ca. 30 Tracks die die Wege und Kreuzung weiter Südlich zeigen, ich hab auch noch zwei die dies ebenso zeigen, ich halte es für unwahrscheinlich das die alle falsch sind.
MfG!
nurdafur (2020-09-30 11:04:41+00:00): Hallo Hans
Danke für den Hinweis.
Da könnte mir tatsächlich ein Fehler passiert sein. Da mein GPS dort anscheinend ungenau war, möchte ich dich bitten, dies anhand deines genaueren Tracks zu korrigieren. Oder du sagst mir, wo ich die Tracks von dieser Kreuzung finde, dann passe ich das selber an.
Liebe Grüße
HansWürstchen (2020-09-30 12:02:06+00:00): Ob mein Track wirklich genauer ist vermag ich nicht abschließend zu beurteilen, jedoch verläuft er mit den öffenlichen GPS-Tracks an dieser Stelle weitestgehend identisch grob in der Mitte, die könnte man dort somit als Referenz nutzen. Zu meinem Track müsste ich jetzt noch den "Korrekturtrack" heranziehen, muss ich jedoch erst suchen, dann kann ich genauere Aussagen zur Kreuzung machen.
nurdafur (2020-09-30 12:47:06+00:00): Wahrscheinlich war der letzte Stand vom Mapper https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/klnkengi richtig. Ich werde also wieder diesen Stand erstellen.
Hevał (2020-10-01 11:20:08+00:00): Hi! Goran

Your changes will be visible for everyone so don’t add your own house as “wilderness_hut” please, if you want to recognize your house on the map simply add it as one of your favorites 

-haval