piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MacLondon (2019-01-29 18:01:46+00:00): Sorry for the long delay in replying, Mike.

I doubt these routes have names unlike e.g. the old named "quiet routes" in Waltham Forest. Both are shown in grey on https://www.enjoywalthamforest.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Mini-Holland-Overview-Maps-v26.jpg

The newer local network seems structured like a grid with east-west & north-south 'links' between the existing or new main routes. So these links might not be named if not part of some new named route.

On OSM, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9114441 is now tagged as a proposed route. This route is shown on a sneak preview of the digital map promised as part of the miniholland project as being part of a route labelled as C26. This might not be the official ref for that complete route as the map is not yet finalised.

The map doesn't include the old routes. See http://appliedwayfinding.com/projects/waltham-forest-mini-holland/ for detils. Photo of map is at http://appliedwayfinding.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Pages-from-WF_Masterplan_Final_spreads_01.04.2016-2.png

The route in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9114443 has been marked on the ground (with paint) as a cycle route for some time. I think road markings on Jewel Road are more recent so I extended the route along here.

Regards,
Mac
Carnildo (2018-12-17 07:44:35+00:00): #please-edit-in-smaller-pieces-or-use-a-meaningful-changeset-commment #or-both :)
alester (2018-12-18 02:05:09+00:00): Can you please explain what the source of your changes was? It seems like you changed some populations based on some unknown source, and incorrectly changed the place type of a few places.

...and I agree that meaningful changeset comments would be greatly appreciated.
#a #big #mess #of #hashtags #doesn't #tell #us #anything #especially #ones #that #are #seemingly #random #8532 #jhdks899
Geography Canada (2018-12-18 04:37:39+00:00): They're based on the 2016 Census. I will be more concise with my changeset comments in the future. I just run out of time and space. And the place types are all correct. What is "jhdks899"?
AkuAnakTimur (2018-12-17 12:27:47+00:00): For all R&Rs across PLUS:

Aren't they always "Kawasan Rehat"? Not "Kawasan Rehat & Rawat"?

See:

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/k4bKMenwfEQWqOBdcYiurw

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/qBCaHFwCjokYF4sxRtUgXw
angys (2018-12-17 12:40:10+00:00): Beacuse their website said “Kawasan Rehat dan Rawat” or R&R. If you wish to use Kawasan Rehat or Rest Area (not Rest and Service Area), I will update for it, thank you.
AkuAnakTimur (2018-12-17 13:20:48+00:00): Because that's what they say on signboards - on the ground rule (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule).

You can still name those as Kawasan Rehat & Rawat on alt_name tag
angys (2018-12-17 13:50:20+00:00): OK, but how about “Arah Utara” or “Northbound”?
AkuAnakTimur (2018-12-19 06:34:21+00:00): alt_name can handle that if you want.

alt_name = Kawasan Rehat dan Rawat XYZ; Kawasan Rehat dan Rawat XYZ Arah Utara / Selatan

That semicolon (;) is necessary to add another name.

If you also feel like doing it, include

short_name = R&R XYZ

(R&R is visible even from the signboards)

In real life, if you travel northwards, you won't go to the services on the opposite side of the journey.
angys (2018-12-19 07:08:15+00:00): OK, I will fix and standardize the naming later, thanks for your kindly reminder. (See your inbox)
angys (2018-12-20 06:03:17+00:00): And then may I add highway exit for each R&R
angys (2018-12-23 07:24:51+00:00): Hello did you see this?
AkuAnakTimur (2018-12-23 08:06:55+00:00): Don't need to tag highway exits. Because exit means you're going out from the expressways to enter another road.

You would eventually come back into the expressways from any R&Rs.
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:27:05+00:00): اینطوری اسم گذاشتن صحیح نیست. قبلا دلیلش رو توضیح دادم
literan (2018-12-17 20:45:08+00:00): для арок корректный тег tunnel=building_passage (tunnel=yes это для тоннелей под землей), соответственно, layer=-1 тут тоже не нужен. Исправил.
eggie (2018-12-17 07:10:06+00:00): Dag Aimee.. De officiële naam die rendert is Eetcafé Bram. name:nl=  wordt alleen buiten Nederland gebruikt (en in Friesland)  en zal dus niet renderen. 
Wellicht zul je nog iets moeten aanpassen?
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2018-12-18 00:24:05+00:00): geen reactie, dus tags alsnog aangepast.
chnav (2018-12-17 08:33:43+00:00): Пожалуйста не пишите в названиях кавычки и описательные слова "магазин". SHOP это и есть магазин. Спасибо.
chnav (2018-12-17 08:41:00+00:00): Пожалуйста не пишите в названиях кавычки и описательные слова "магазин". SHOP это и есть магазин. Спасибо.
aharvey (2018-12-17 23:34:15+00:00): Hi Sean,

Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor for details on how to tag indoor features, as a lot of these features are missing the required tags to give them meaning.

the level tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level is a very useful combination so that the result is viable in things like OpenLevelUp, eg https://openlevelup.net/?l=-1#19/-33.79724/151.18117

It would be better to go through the JOSM validator warnings which popup before uploading, it can fix things like duplicated nodes, warn you about untagged ways and other errors.

Are you absolutely sure all the features you deleted are gone now?

Also it's better to keep existing objects like https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/73149021 why was that deleted?

This is a pretty big change, and I can see you've tried to ensure the existing mapped shops like Big W, Woolworths. Maybe if you're going to do more, post the osm file first so we can review the import before it happens, which is best practice per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
aharvey (2018-12-17 23:38:16+00:00): I think we need to decide if it's worth continuing from this and cleaning it up, or revert it all and start again.
Warin61 (2018-12-20 07:01:14+00:00): Way: 655517620 has no tags, self crosses and has a duplicated node. 
way 655517376 dupliceted node ... and many more ...
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.74191&lat=-32.53565&zoom=16

Sorry Sean. 
Your just starting out. Suggest you do one simple floor/level .. and wait a few days to check that it draws no comment?
Warin61 (2019-01-01 02:37:56+00:00): Way 655517707 had duplicated nodes - fixed. Might lead to other problems elsewhere.

And no tags as to what it is... ??? parking area?
Warin61 (2019-01-15 22:39:42+00:00): Still many problems here. 

Sean .. look at https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.74092&lat=-32.53596&zoom=16&opacity=0.82

Try to fix these problems. 
Way 655517428 has no tag to say what it is.

For me and the others the simplest thing to do is delete the lot - leaving the shops. This won't change the map as the things that would be deleted are not rendering anyway.
Warin61 (2019-02-09 07:05:27+00:00): Add tag building=retail so shop=mall will render. 

You do need to add tags to those things that have no tags... 

---------------
I also added an enclosing way with landuse=retail ...
aharvey (2019-02-09 08:24:00+00:00): I'd also be okay with a revert of this import, due to the quality issues uncovered until they can be resolved.
gadgetguy (2019-03-09 08:11:58+00:00): You have to applaud the amount of work done and effort trying to map this out but I think its well over the top for the needs of OSM, I contributed to this area prior to the Overhaul of the site and was returning to make some minor changes to layout  obviously  its been replaced with this data which would be great on an architectural drawing but this isn't what people are after when looking at the map, Just knowing if there is a Coles in there is enough for most people, I agree with Warin61 that this should be put out to grass and re drawn
Warin61 (2019-03-09 08:28:37+00:00): I'd use what there is there as a basis for another go. Most of it is not rendered .. some of it has no tags. Certainly some of it will be useful. 

I'm not local so cannot help. Good luck to who ever takes it on.
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:26:11+00:00): روی خیابون اینجوری اسم نذارید صحیح نیست قبلا توضیحش دادم چرا
Warin61 (2019-01-15 22:47:42+00:00): Vicinity Centres... 
Tagged as a building

But also tagged as an office? 

So what are is it? 
A building - leave the office tag off
An office .. leave off the building tags. 

OSM guide is one feature - one OSM entry. 
Suggest you leave the building entry .. remove the office tag
Make a new node for the office and add its details there. 
If the building is for offices ... then building=office - see the OSMwiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building#Commercial
Warin61 (2019-01-25 05:05:47+00:00): No response.

Deleted name, office and level.
Something B (2019-03-11 21:42:15+00:00): Это детский сад, или что?
bye12 (2018-12-19 00:29:32+00:00): Imagery is out of date, you put a service road through a building
hkkollip (2019-07-10 11:28:26+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Thanks for reverting the changes. 

We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
hkkollip.
andergrin (2018-12-17 16:22:31+00:00): Це ворота в огорожі, чи просто початок доріжки, що проходить по території дитсадка?
literan (2018-12-17 20:48:30+00:00): Добрый день. Полигоны с единственным тегом area=yes равносильны полигонам без тега, поэтому я его удалю - непонятно, что вы этим хотели сказать.
SergZL (2018-12-17 21:26:50+00:00): Это первый этаж здания. Не было времени подумать над описанием и как правильно оформить, хотел позже к нему вернуться и закончить.
literan (2018-12-18 06:32:42+00:00): Понятно. В таком случае лучше писать note=описание на объект. Полигоны с единственным area=yes  массово новички обычно расставляют просто потому, что можно
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:25:04+00:00): روی خیابون اینجوری اسم نمیذارن. اسم تابلو رو باید وارد کنید.
Carnildo (2018-12-18 05:58:51+00:00): Was removing "surface=asphalt" from the south end of Iron Court intentional?
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
nevw (2018-12-18 02:48:15+00:00): Hi 
We normally make a relation and reuse a single way that is common to both areas with a common boundary. See how Blue Fig Creek Nature Refuge is mapped with a relation and the ways are split and the same way is used by Upper Austinville Nature Refuge and the Springbrook National Park relations.
nevw (2018-12-18 02:55:58+00:00): I notice this Austinville area and Bally Mountain Conservation Area Nature Refuge and not in CAPAD 2016, so I expect they will be in the 2018 edition due out in early 2019.
nevw (2018-12-18 05:43:56+00:00): I think it would be best to leave as is until/if it is included in CAPAD 2018 because it will have the gazetted boundaries.
ndm (2018-12-17 09:22:22+00:00): In bing the service road looks like it's drawn through parking spaces.
pattamaa (2018-12-18 10:18:55+00:00): Thanks for the update @ndm, we have corrected the alignment of the segments  as per your recommendation.   Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.
gurglypipe (2018-12-17 10:25:47+00:00): I think it should be at level=0, since it’s at ground level. level=-1 is underground. I’ll fix it up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65542514
gurglypipe (2018-12-17 10:28:18+00:00): Tweaked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65544904. I hope that’s OK. Thanks for your work on everything!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65542514
MapperTwo (2018-12-17 11:07:06+00:00): ok, never realised the subtlety of what the default setting did.
lentando (2018-12-17 14:08:03+00:00): Aber die kleinere Zufahrt von der Kirchhofstraße aus gibt es doch immer noch!

Sollte man die nicht bestehen lassen? Und stattdessen lieber noch ein barrier=gate und evt. opening_hours ranschreiben?
dx125 (2018-12-17 16:12:53+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe die alte Zufahrt gerade wieder hergestellt und das Tor ergänzt. 
Die Öffnungszeiten kenne ich nicht, aber dies kann man später noch ergänzen.
ndm (2018-12-17 09:20:27+00:00): This is 2 adjacent driveways, not one service road.
mvviveka (2018-12-17 15:44:04+00:00): Thanks for the update, ndm. made the edit  as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.
ndm (2018-12-17 09:56:17+00:00): Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655566640 is a loop?
jguthula (2018-12-18 14:09:20+00:00): Hi NDM,

Thanks for looking into our edits. Can I know what you meant by a loop in this case? Do you mean to split the road? From the Satellite imagery it looks like the complete segment belongs to one entity.

Do let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
ndm (2018-12-18 19:58:40+00:00): Checked Bing Streetside - looks more plausible than satellite imagery alone.
andergrin (2018-12-17 10:15:15+00:00): Відкотив зміни, бо є нове рішення міськради від 6.12.18, остаточна назва "Майдан небесної сотні", в транспорті просто ще озвучку не поміняли
Sergiy Kozyr (2018-12-17 10:27:49+00:00): Дякую за уточнення. Я орієнтувався по трамвайній озвучці.
Jakka (2018-12-17 09:53:06+00:00): votre ajout highway=stop correct ? highway n'a plus de definiton type de rue?
Jakka (2018-12-17 10:30:06+00:00): Je viens de corriger. un "stop" est toujours sur une "node" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378520342
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:17:30+00:00): تگ رو اشتباه وارد کردید تگ درست: barrier=entrance
mavl (2018-12-28 16:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65846485 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data].
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:17:24+00:00): تگ رو اشتباه وارد کردید تگ درست: barrier=entrance
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:17:05+00:00): تگ رو اشتباه وارد کردید، تگ درست: barrier=entrance
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:16:38+00:00): تگ رو اشتباه وارد کردید، تگ barrier=entrance وارد کنید
Rich1234 (2018-12-17 10:47:13+00:00): Your incorrect tag name and contents for opening hours has been deleted.

Feel free to add back a correct opening hours tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours for details on the correct tag name and the proper value syntax.
lanxana_imports (2018-12-17 18:13:29+00:00): Hola! Veig que ets nou a OSM i et volia comentar que en aquest cas no calia posar les dades de l’adreça a l’edifici, donat que aquesta informació ja està inclosa a la porta d’accés des del carrer Zamora. Estem fent la importació dels edificis a Barcelona i les adreces les posem a la porta d’accés, menys quan aquesta no és visible, hi ha dubtes o no en té (p.e. en edificis abandonats), que llavors es deixa en l’edifici fins que es pugui verificar. Si t’animes i coneixes bé la zona, ens pots donar un cop de mà corregint els errors que hi pugui haver, o afegir-te a la comunitat, de ben segur trobaràs projectes del teu interès: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Catalan

¡Hola! Veo que eres nuevo en OSM y te quería comentar que en este caso no hacía falta poner los datos de la dirección en el edificio, dado que esta información ya está incluida en la porta de acceso desde la calle Zamora. Estamos haciendo la importación de los edificios en Barcelona y las direcciones las ponemos en la puerta de acceso, menos cuando esta no es visible, hay dudas o no tiene (p.e. en edificios abandonados), que entonces se deja en el edificio hasta que se pueda verificar. Si te animas y conoces bien la zona, nos puedes echar una mano corrigiendo los errores que pueda haber, o unirte a la comunidad, donde seguro encontrarás proyectos de tu interés: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:12:32+00:00): فکر کنم اسم صحیح این پارک، پارک شورا باشه.
eggie (2018-12-17 09:59:30+00:00): Dag Lisanne.. In OSM Nederland worden geen bedrijfsnamen en adressen getagd op de buildingshape. Adressen zijn al aanwezig op nodes en daar graag op bijtaggen.
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2018-12-28 16:43:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65846485 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data].
ndm (2018-12-17 10:15:37+00:00): Surely some of these are parking aisles
jguthula (2018-12-18 14:54:16+00:00): Hi NDM,

Again thanks for looking into our edits. I totally agree to your point on some of the roads being parking_aisles in this changeset. From our previous editing experience we noticed a bit of disconnect on judging a parking_aisel. Just to make sure wrong information is not added to OSM, we asked our editors not to map parking_aisel, but to add the primary tag i.e., `highway=*` if they are clear with it. Again the main intention for taking this decision is to make sure wrong data is not added to OSM by our team members. 

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Jothirandh
ndm (2018-12-18 17:37:00+00:00): Thanks for helping to improve OpenStreetmap here in Bristol -- please ensure all edits are accurate and based on up to date information.

Best regards,
Neil

P.S.
This appears to be "organised editting" can you indicate the hashtag you are using and the wiki page you have set up, as per the organised editing guidleines: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/1/13/Organised_editing_guidelines_version_20180908.pdf
jguthula (2018-12-20 10:22:56+00:00): yes Neil, we are improving OSM data to improve delivery programs of Amazon. You can find more information of our team from the following wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_Logistics

Let us know if there any recommendations or suggestions that can improve our mapping process.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
532910 (2019-01-22 09:34:15+00:00): Во-первых это не "парковый дворик", во-вторых это не "лес", В третьих почитайте вначале вики, перед тем как портить карту.
eggie (2018-12-17 10:01:12+00:00): Nogmaals .. De namen horen niet op de gebouwen zelf, maar op de BAG adresnodes.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-17 10:19:46+00:00): Info naar adresnode verplaatst.. duplikaat adres verwijderd...
mueschel (2018-12-18 11:01:04+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong here. You duplicated already existing objects (now they are in the database twice) and added some strange tags like 

osm_way_id=531636707
other_tags="crop"=>"rice"

Please have a look and remove these duplicated tags.

Jan
mavl (2018-12-28 16:43:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65846485 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data].
Константин Гам (2019-02-14 09:38:44+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Вы сломали вело-роутинг, не надо так. Здесь НЕТ велопешеходной зоны БЕЗразрывной, пожалуйста отметьте все разрывы, иначе портиться приоритезация в маршрутах.
R0bst3r (2018-12-18 07:03:29+00:00): Hallo Paramida,
kurzer Hinweis zu place=* als area. Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244478306 ist das place Tag am landuse gewesen, indem du den name Tag gelöscht hast, hast du es namenslos gemacht. Du hast dafür einen node erstellt, jetzt sind es aber 2 places für Bühlhof.
Place kann man durchaus für kleine Orte an areas anheften. Nominatim tut sich dann ggf. leichter die Adresse zu finden, wenn es mehrere place Nodes in der Umgebung gibt.
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65544643
FredrikLindseth (2018-12-17 14:46:56+00:00): Hei Mr Selby og velkommen til OSM. Ser du har tegnet noen stier, men ikke gitt de taggen highway=path (sti) og ikke koblet de til de nærliggende stiene. 

Du må redigere veiene dine og legge til taggene highway=path på de og koble til de andre stiene. Ellers vil veien ikke dukke opp og ingen kan gå der.
blef (2018-12-18 12:16:01+00:00): Indication de la source erronée.  
Trans-Landes n'est pas concerné!  
Pas de source particulière ici, simple mise en forme des indications sans changements.
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:11:43+00:00): این طرز اسم دادن صحیح نیست. قبلا توضیح دادم چرا.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 23:10:26+00:00): این شکل نام دادن به خیابان صحیح نیست. قبلا توضیح دادم چکارش کنید!
4004 (2018-12-19 21:15:25+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты.
я думаю швейная мастерская все же не стала кафе?
4004 (2018-12-19 21:15:51+00:00): а, вижу откатили
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 14:28:45+00:00): تگ اشتباه دادید. اینجا محل سکونت نیست در نتیجه خیابان نباید این تگ رو داشته باشه!
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 14:25:28+00:00): برای رسم دوربرگردان از تگ highway=primary_link استفاده می‌شود. درواقع دو جاده بهم متصل میشوند به همین دلیل باید از تگ اتصال اسفتاده کرد.
eggie (2018-12-17 11:28:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-17 11:47:24+00:00): amenity =bank heb ik verwijderd. en ..omgezet in ATM aan de oostzijde.
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 14:24:06+00:00): برای رسم دوربرگردان از تگ highway=primary_link استفاده می‌شود. درواقع دو جاده بهم متصل میشوند به همین دلیل باید از تگ اتصال اسفتاده کرد.
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 14:23:08+00:00): برای رسم دوربرگردان از تگ highway=primary_link استفاده می‌شود. درواقع دو جاده بهم متصل میشوند به همین دلیل باید از تگ اتصال اسفتاده کرد.
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-02 19:52:43+00:00): Hallo Nikbeat01, 
ich kann mir nicht so recht vorstellen, dass das Haus "Kelllerband Grünheide" heisst?
eggie (2018-12-17 11:31:47+00:00): Nuttige bijdrage. Begin echter nooit met access=no  Dat is een totaalverbod voor iedereen. foot=yes is default op en wandelpad en hoef je niet te taggen.
MVG,
Eggie
Nietsnut (2018-12-17 11:47:40+00:00): Bedankt voor je opmerking. Ik heb e.e.a aangepast.
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 14:19:16+00:00): این طرز نقطه زدن صحیح نیست. باید بهش تگ بدید:
building=dormitory
abakus_uploader (2018-12-17 23:30:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 14:12:21+00:00): برای رسم دوربرگردان از تگ highway=primary_link استفاده می‌شود. درواقع دو جاده بهم متصل میشوند به همین دلیل باید از تگ اتصال اسفتاده کرد.