piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2017-08-06 20:11:00+00:00): Hi,
you added many very strange tags here and on other restaurants. Please have a look to the Wiki to see how objects are tagged in OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513151990
DiningRoomHours
DriveThruHours
EnglishApplicationUrl
HasDiningRoom
HasDriveThru
ImageUrl
Latitude
Longitude
OpenDate
ShowSeparatedHours
SpanishApplicationUrl

Second, where is all this data from? You give "bing" as source in this changeset which can't be right. Please be careful when adding external data to OSM and always check if the license of this data is compatible with ODbL.

Jan
mneko (2017-08-06 20:21:05+00:00): I'm trying to follow the instructions on http://maproulette.org/ui/metrics/433
i might have misunderstood it
mueschel (2017-08-06 21:50:48+00:00): I don't think they meant to copy all the data from there. You can have a look how other restaurants of this chain are mapped:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qQe
mneko (2017-08-07 14:09:40+00:00): OK, I think I corrected the ones I broke
mueschel (2017-08-08 18:29:35+00:00): This looks good. *thumbs up
RicoElectrico (2017-08-05 19:47:21+00:00): Cześć, trochę nie wyszło Ci dodanie linku Wikipedii. Nie wskazałeś języka. Powinno być:

wikipedia=pl:Park Środula Okrzei
stimoroll (2017-08-06 10:44:06+00:00): Podziękował.
damjang (2017-10-04 12:20:20+00:00): Scusa, ma si mappa la realtà e non cose inventate: "Terreno di Gioco",  non significa niente in questo contesto, ed anche con la G maiuscola...: il nome è solo sloveno come scritto sulla placca presso il campetto:
https://www.slosport.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/255-MemorialSavoUsaj2017_2dan.jpg
Ti prego di correggere come era prima. Grazie
Piskvor (2017-08-06 20:54:18+00:00): Dobrý den,
 vysílač je otevřený pro veřejnost každý den, ale pouze jednu minutu po půlnoci? To se mi zdá dost nepravděpodobné.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-05 22:18:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51764077, 51763240 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mass removal of 'oneway=yes' on roundabouts performed by user Grauer after seeing this flagged on Osmose; after complaints from the Dutch community the user asked DWG to help with revert.
keithonearth (2017-08-05 20:19:21+00:00): I failed to update the source tag, yet again. This did use Bing, but also used Mapbox for sections.
adrianojbr (2017-08-22 22:06:06+00:00): carlos, nem todo retorno circular é rotatória, especialmente quando uma via passa pelo meio, como nesses casos: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265787850
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503298680
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196220194

abraço.
Carlos Brys (2017-08-23 11:09:23+00:00): Adriano, muchas gracias por la aclaración.
Lo voy a tener en cuenta.
Etiqueté los rotornos como rotonda, porque OSMOSE lo indicaba así.
Un abrazo
eggie (2017-08-06 05:50:30+00:00): PB met Welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-08-06 06:03:44+00:00): Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
De naam die je hebt gegevens kan wellicht beter op een note=
Ik heb deze wijzigingen teruggezet.

Het is zaak juiste de landuse in te vullen. Leisure park is de functie en is hier niet van toepassing. Er is al veel schade ontstaan door het verwijderen van landuse en het omzetten naar park.
Leisure park is een transparant die los over de landuse heen ligt. (net als residential.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
eggie (2017-08-06 06:15:56+00:00): Ik heb je wat geholpen. De landuse is hersteld.
svp niet de landuse of Leisure vastmaken aan wegen. Dat heb ik losgemaakt. Dat geeft problemen als een andere mapper iets gaat verschuiven.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust. In het begin volgen we de startende mapper.... ook om te helpen.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-06 00:19:41+00:00): Cześć,

amenity=food_court nie pasuje tutaj. Patrz:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfood_court

Ja dałbym po prostu amenity=fast_food i cuisine=vietnamese
literan (2017-08-06 21:50:49+00:00): Здравствуйте! Скажите, а какой смысл в добавлении на здания тегов addr:city и 
addr:country, если в России используется сокращенная система адресации https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.A1.D0.BE.D0.BA.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.89.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.8F_.D1.81.D1.85.D0.B5.D0.BC.D0.B0.2C_.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.B7.D1.83.D0.B5.D0.BC.D0.B0.D1.8F_.D0.B2_.D0.A0.D0.BE.D1.81.D1.81.D0.B8.D0.B8_.D0.B4.D0.B5-.D1.84.D0.B0.D0.BA.D1.82.D0.BE ??? Получается, что никакой пользы нет, зато бесцельно завышается объем базы данных.
gladi2001 (2017-08-07 05:48:46+00:00): Добрый день!
Поддержка наследования названия города  из тегов полигонов хоть и заявлена в различных конвертерах, в том же osm2mp, но работает, скажем так, в одном случае из трех. Особенно в случае когда дома входят в мультиполигоны районов и иных административно-территориальных единиц в крупных городах. Особенно если эти города являются субъектами РФ (Мск, СПб, Севастополь). В этом случае действительно крайне желательно иметь заполненные теги addr:city для получения однозначко корректного результата после конвертации данных osm в mp.
Кроме того, часто приходится сталкиваться в той же Москве с ситуацией, когда в тег addr:city вносится названия муниципальных районов города (Марьина роща и т.д.). Это неверно. И так же было исправлено в одной из правок.
Заполнение тега addr:country, пожалуй, действительно избыточно и не несет практического смысла. Более заполнять не буду.
literan (2017-08-07 10:57:14+00:00): "работает, скажем так, в одном случае из трех" - можно пруфлинк? все, чем пользуюсь я (глагне, османд, мапсми) - все работает. Наверное, это проблема кривых рендереров, но мы же не должны мапить под рендерер, верно? И самое главное: для массовых автоматических правок требуется предварительное согласование с сообществом. Можно ссылочку на это согласование/обсуждение?
literan (2017-08-07 11:16:17+00:00): Давайте переместимся в форум, я поднял там тему: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=658466#p658466
gladi2001 (2017-08-07 11:59:44+00:00): Конкретный адрес который помню - Мясницкая 35.
osm2mp его ну никак не хотел определять CityName. Адресов таких хватало в Москве и в Минске.
В тегах addr:city встречаются, например (вырезка из скрипта, который подпиливает mp файл после конвертации:
Красносельский район
Мещанский район
Москва, район Хорошёво-Мнёвники
Москва, район Щукино
Обручевский район
Останкинский район
Под конкретный рендерер, безусловно, ничего подгонять не нужно, и вредно это.
Обсуждения не было. Да и как то об этом, если честно, не задумался.
Хотя, пожалуй, действительно логично такие вещи предварительно обсуждать.
Давайте тогда откатим эти изменения.
Но по МСК osm2mp точно криво определяет CityName при конвертации в польский формат.
gladi2001 (2017-08-07 12:07:44+00:00): P.S.
Попытался написать сообщение на форуме, но чего-то не получилось...
literan (2017-08-07 12:31:04+00:00): а что пишет форум? вы там зарегистрированы? нужна регистрация...
Alexander-II (2017-08-07 13:57:48+00:00): Для новичков там премодерация сообщений. Пока не одобрят, сообщение не появится.
saikabhi (2017-08-07 06:23:41+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. You have added a park node. Can you recheck this?

Thank you
Abhishek
Alexander-II (2017-08-07 08:39:39+00:00): Обе ваши правки откатываю. Смысла в них нету никакого.
S-zation (2017-08-06 22:26:00+00:00): Can I ask for a reasoning for your mass demotions/promotions of road classes?  You changed PA-611 to primary when it has been listed as a trunk route for 6 years.  What's even stranger is that you left the northern portion in Warrington as a trunk road.  I feel that PA-611 is on par with PA-309 (also a trunk road) and is a more major route than other Pennsylvania state routes it intersects (like 263 and 132).  Mapbox uses this data and you shouldn't demote major roads without discussion on OSM forums.
You also promoted many smaller residential roads to tertiary (which may be fine), but you only partially promoted the road while leaving other sections residential.  You also made the entrances to shopping centers tertiary class and a car wash service road(?!) tertiary classes when they should have been left as service roads, driveways, drive-throughs, etc.
Lastly, when you were changing these entrances, you left the PA-611 line jagged.  iD and JOSM include line straightening tools that you should use.

I've also noticed that you have been making similar road demotion/promotion changes throughout the northeast.  Are these being discussed with anyone?

Please make edits and in the future, PLEASE add a comment on what you are changing.
S-zation (2017-08-10 21:38:43+00:00): I reverted this in 51014800.  I reviewed some roads you changed in 51015531.  Blair Mill Road and Dresher Road are higher traffic and should be tertiary.  I also made some of the roads in shopping centers unclassified/minor.
MKnight (2017-08-06 19:13:27+00:00): Moin,
Du hast hier ein childcare über einen bereits seit Ewigkeiten  bestehenden Kindergarten gemappt, welche der beiden Versionen ist die richtige?
MKnight (2017-08-06 19:20:58+00:00): Selbes Problem in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50873065
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50873044
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50873036

Ich vermute es gibt irgendeine Challenge oder so? Sinnvoll sind die Änderungen jedenfalls nicht.
j1scad (2017-08-08 15:28:06+00:00): ergänzt werden sollten die Kindergärten als (Frei-)Fläche, deshalb "Kindergarten" statt "Kinderbetreuung"
hab es korrigiert
kykuka (2017-08-18 15:02:38+00:00): Hallo Zusammen,
die Änderungen sind mir soeben auch aufgefallen. Zwei Anmerkungen von mir.

a) Die Unstimmigkeit das hier zunächst amenity=childcare benutzt wurde, rührt offensichtlich aus der iD-Editor Vorlage.
Die Vorlagenbezeichnungen des iD-Editors lauten im Englischen:
Preschool/Kindergarten Grounds 	für „amenity=kindergarten“
Nursery/Childcare 			für „amenity=childcare“
Die Vorlagenbezeichnungen des iD-Editors lauten im Deutschen:
Kindergarten 				für „amenity=kindergarten“
Kindertagesstätte/Kinderbetreuung 	für „amenity=childcare“

An welcher Stelle werden diese Vorlage-Beschriftungstexte definiert?
Ich wäre froh wenn diese angepasst werden würden, ggf. angelehnt an die wiki‘s.:

Wiki-Übersicht
English:
„amenity=kindergarten“   https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten
„amenity=childcare“   https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=childcare
Deutsch:
„amenity=kindergarten“  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten
„amenity=childcare“   keine deutsches wiki-Seite verfügbar 

Gibt es Vorschläge dafür? 

b) Derzeit ist bei diesen CS-Änderungen immer noch etwas ungünstig gemappt, weil gegen die Regel „Ein Objekt eine OSM Definition“ (One feature, one OSM element) verstossen wird, siehe wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:One_feature,_one_OSM_element

j1scad, magst Du dazu (b) noch etwas ändern?

Viele Grüsse
k.k.
saikabhi (2017-08-07 06:21:00+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Parks should only be named with name=* tag for official names. You can also draw the area of the park and tag it with leisure=park. Please make these changes

Thanks
Abhishek
gscholz (2019-04-20 06:43:41+00:00): Hi Gilmar,
thsi changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate segments:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-53.07376&lat=-29.78938&zoom=17

Can you please fix this?

Guido
manoharuss (2017-08-08 06:31:06+00:00): Hi Vi Saez,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. 

May I suggest going through http://learnosm.org/en/ to quickly get started on understanding OSM tagging schema and common mapping practices.


Thank you. Happy Mapping!!!


Regards,

Manohar
jorge_o (2017-10-18 18:06:36+00:00): Hola Nico: ¿Cuál es la justificación para eliminar la relación "Zona de Restauración y Protección Ambiental del área de Recarga del Manantial de la Mintzita"?
NicoVargas (2017-10-18 18:12:03+00:00): Hola Jorge. Básicamente es que la información incoporada no es un área natural protegida aún, sino que fue un documento que se publicó el DOF como propuesta, pero no se llegó a aprobar por temas relacionados al parecer con consulta a los ejidatarios de la zona. No sé cómo habrá estado, pero bueno. Por eso se quitó. Un abrazo
jorge_o (2017-10-19 00:57:27+00:00): Gracias Nico:
ya veo el problema
Abrazo
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2018-09-13 05:34:44+00:00): I have been regularly walking pass this coordinate along the west side of Bowonniwet temple for several months now (at night time), and yet I could only spot the regular BMTA bus stop and a small 30 km/h speed limit sign around there.

Is this intended for representing a ground-visible bus stop or terminus for Giant Ibis service? If it is, what shape or color should I look for, and does it appear only in a specific time of day?

Thank you.

P.S. Note that an actual Giant Ibis Transport office is mapped as a travel agent shop on Tanao road, ~60 m down south.
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=13.75952&mlon=100.49910&zoom=19>
de vries (2017-08-24 10:54:36+00:00): Hi Grauer, Can you elaborate why you removed the oneway tags from the cycleways around this roundabout? https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.49992&mlon=6.25936#map=19/52.49992/6.25936
Grauer (2017-08-24 16:57:04+00:00): Hello de vries,

Please at first. I won´t distroy datas. The ideas behind my change set is to make the database better. Junktion=roundabout implied oneway=yes. 

The information i refer to is http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout 

In the case for your Netherlands community the changes are a no go, do you have any idea to create a query in leaflet. If it is a no go, I will reverse the changes.

Best wishes.
Grauer
de vries (2017-08-26 21:45:44+00:00): Hi Grauer,
as you may be aware, your actions have been discussed on the dutch forum and on multiple of your changesets. 
The problem is that you didn't follow the guidelines for automated edits and in the process deleted some useful information. (cycleways are not always oneway, so explicitly tagging this is useful.)
So I suggest that you revert this edits.

Happy mapping!
de vries (2017-08-26 21:47:04+00:00): (cycleways *at roundabouts* are not always oneway, so explicitly tagging this is useful.)
Grauer (2017-08-28 04:36:40+00:00): Hello de vries,

I thing I have the solution. JOSM, Overpass API. Junction=roundabout; oneway=null; User=Grauer.

I will do it the next days. But it takes time.

All the best.

Grauer
de vries (2017-08-31 08:18:57+00:00): This seems like a complicated revert, so if you're not sure what you're doing, you better contact the DWG. They are really good at reverting stuff.

have a nice day!
Grauer (2017-08-31 17:13:40+00:00): Thank you for the advice. I contact the GWD.

In the meantime I thing I know what I am doing. Or is there a new reason to search for a problem? I hope not. 

I am searching in JOSM with the overpass API

[out:xml][timeout:25][bbox:{{bbox}}];
(
  node["junction"="roundabout"]["oneway"!~"."];
  way["junction"="roundabout"]["oneway"!~"."];
  relation["junction"="roundabout"]["oneway"!~"."];
);
(._;>;);
out meta;

and the filterplugin in JOSM my datasets and map it step by step. That takes time, but punishment must be. 

If you found a new mistake, please be so kind and give me a note.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-05 22:18:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51764077, 51763240 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mass removal of 'oneway=yes' on roundabouts performed by user Grauer after seeing this flagged on Osmose; after complaints from the Dutch community the user asked DWG to help with revert.
de vries (2017-09-06 18:28:34+00:00): Thanks Grauer, Thanks woodpeck_repair.
TheSwavu (2017-08-06 06:28:27+00:00): Hi, I've notice you've misspelt Mirri.

See:
http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/di/2016-29/current/pdf/2016-29.pdf
nm7s9 (2017-08-12 14:08:14+00:00): Hi, 

When I surveyed this area the street signs (plural) said "Mibri Close".

However when I saw that I was altering what you had tagged, I checked "LPI NSW" ACTMAPI and ACT disallowable instruements and they both said "Mirri" and the latter document elaborated that Mirri is "native dog, or Dingo".   Therefore I have now put name=Mirri and alt name "Mibri". Hopefully search engines will find both.

My reason for surveying new districts is so that prospective new home buyers can find how to get to prospective allotments. Therefore Mirri is best but an alt of Mibri so they don't get too confused when they get there.

PS some time ago, I drove all roads in the act and found about a dozen instances where the street signs were incorrect. I e-mailled the act gov about these and within 2 months, all signs had been corrcted :-)
aharvey (2017-08-29 11:44:06+00:00): It was accepted practice in OSM to map what's one the ground https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground. So if the street sign says Mibri Close and the legislation says Mirri Close, then we map name=Mibri Close, and put Mirri Close in one of the alt names and not the other way around.
TheSwavu (2017-08-29 20:53:01+00:00): This is Canberra. Good practice is to put in the correct name and report the spelling error to:

https://www.accesscanberra.act.gov.au/app/forms/fixmystreet

;-)
nm7s9 (2017-08-30 02:58:16+00:00): While surveying Canberra and parts of NSW, I came accross numerous cases where the street signs on opposite ends of a street had different spellings. How should I tag this case, and no, I'm not going to split the street in half and tag them differently :-)

I also found one case (since corrected) where the one street sign had different spellings on the front/back(McKivat/McKivatt Close in Gordon ACT) . In another case (Medhurst Crescent, Crace, if I remember correctly), it took them 3 tries to get the street sign correct.

The only solution is a silly one where we have multiple ,equal precedance, tags for name that would encompass the correct legal names, in however many languages as appropriate and also any mispellings that may be on the ground.  Then search engines, or navigators could be more certain of giving users the correct info.

PS - thanks for the link to fixmystreet. I have reported the problem.  Therefore I can now claim (almost with a straight face) that the incorrect signs are now a temporary fixture and should not be tagged :-)
nm7s9 (2017-08-30 03:02:37+00:00): PS - on my report I couldn't pinpoint the issues on their maps precisely, because they use Google maps and are badly out of date. (Doesn't even have the new suburb).
gds (2017-09-01 10:29:34+00:00): Dear antal, why did you delete node 4961913838 ?
it had some information in it, that is not there now...
antal (2017-09-01 15:22:52+00:00): Dear gds, thanks on pointing it out. I did not copy tags to area feature I used instead of node. I have created a node again, please check it.

With appologies,
antal
anonym33 (2017-08-06 05:30:09+00:00): Dort ist kein Lift und auch keine Piste.
Es gibt aber eine Skiroute, welche von der Talabfahrt nach Celerina abzweigt und nach Samedan führt.
gileri (2017-08-06 10:15:39+00:00): Oups j'ai pas été explicite, c'était des exemples de valeurs que j'ai donné pour les valeurs d'accès.
Par exemple :
motor_vehicle=private
ou
motor_vehicle=destination
ou
motor_vehicle=delivery
Si une combinaison de ces tags est nécessaire, ça peut s'ecrire comme ça :

motor_vehicle=private; destination; delivery

Des exemples d'usage en France sont disponibles ici :

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.fr/keys/access#values
eggie (2017-08-06 06:38:59+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-08-06 06:45:05+00:00): Scholen en kinderdagverblijven worden heel divers gemapt. Wanneer je de info op de adresnode zou zetten is adresinfo en instelling info gekoppeld. Net als bij de apotheek.
Doe je dat zelf?
pietergommers (2017-08-06 20:40:51+00:00): Peuterspeelzalen sttaat er niet als zodanig in, dus heb ik iets gekozen wat er het meest in de buurt komt. Ik dacht dat ik hem hetzelfde had gekoppeld als de apotheek.
eggie (2017-08-06 20:45:43+00:00): Dit was je edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50875754
Amenity childcare staat op het gebouw niet op de node.
eggie (2017-08-06 21:03:47+00:00): Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.77222/4.67222

een voorbeeld van een peuterspeelzaal/kinderdagverblijf.
amenity=kindergarten
dgitto (2017-08-07 05:43:36+00:00): Sarà, ma io il serpentone lo vedo disallineato di 20 metri nella parte a sud. Ma con cosa è allineato? non mi sembra con bing
Gio94 (2017-08-16 15:17:40+00:00): nei livelli Stadard e Mappa Ciclabile ora è corretto
dgitto (2017-08-16 15:41:20+00:00): Il disallineamento lo misuro nei dati grezzi ovviamente, non parlo di rendering. Comunque ti chiedevo su che ortofoto ti sei basato. Perché hai scritto bing, ma non corrisponde. Per Messina abbiamo il layer regionale 1:2000 che è perfetto. E il vecchio pcn2006 altrettanto, che usano tutti per correggere il più aggiornato Bing.
Appena ho tempo allineo un po'di strade
oormilavinod (2017-08-08 04:52:55+00:00): hey  DimaMashnikov!!  welcome to OSM. appreciate you interest in mapping.  I observed that you have pulled a road accidentally causing bad angled roads. I have corrected the errors happy mapping !!
eggie (2017-08-06 09:03:25+00:00): access=during shopping hours. Is dat een aanvaarde tag die uit de wiki komt?
eggie (2017-08-06 09:06:01+00:00): 'k Zie dat het al een tag is van een voorgaande mapper. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50876439
Goede aanvullingen zo!
pietergommers (2017-08-06 20:42:00+00:00): De precieze openingstijden kon ik niet vinden. In het vervolg zal ik deze niet invullen.
eggie (2017-08-06 20:48:05+00:00): Een weg met bepaalde openingstijden gaat anders. Dat is met conditional. 
Kijk even in het forum. Daar is net een draadje over geweest.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
manoharuss (2017-08-07 05:20:08+00:00): Wanted to flag that you have also deleted wikidata, wikipedia and population tags to this feature while adding the pl translation.

Best,

Manohar
literan (2017-08-07 13:16:31+00:00): зачем вы удалили область landuse=residential? Без какого-либо обоснования. Откачу.
manoharuss (2017-08-07 05:17:57+00:00): Hi keivan,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. I have observed that in this changeset you have changed `place=locality` features to `place=city` features for the Shariati Square and Taleqani square. Can you change them back to the locality. The city of Mashhad is already mapped.

Thank you,

Manohar
Bicyclst (2017-09-04 21:48:54+00:00): Die Werkfeuerwehr ist nicht im Wohnheim!?
VARVAR8 (2017-08-10 17:57:21+00:00): Навіщо змінювати назву дороги на невірну? Вона ніколи не була Т-20-06
Warin61 (2017-08-07 22:45:26+00:00): Hi,
I think you  are mapping the buildings? This is done from the roof outline and they are tagged building= See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building 

The name=* is not used to describe an object - that is a no no. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Landuse=residential is used for larger areas - at least a block. I am lazy and use it to map a much larger area - at least several blocks.
CloCkWeRX (2017-08-08 03:55:37+00:00): I've cleaned up a few of these - thanks for the effort, and welcome to OSM! 

You might be interested in using the 'square' tool in ID to make neater outsides, you can access it via right clicking or using 'S' as a shortcut key.

As others have said, if you type 'House' into the search box on the upper left, you'll get the right tags for a Building (rather than the name)
oormilavinod (2017-08-08 04:48:57+00:00): hey Rossendale Gary welcome to OSM, great yo see your passion for mapping. But during the process I think you have duplicated  way and each on of them have a different route relation. I think it would be best if you could look into it. and resolve this issue way id - 79401704. happy mapping