piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2020-01-07 10:47:11+00:00): Hallo Andi,
Du hast schon wieder Straßen in separate  Ways aufgetrennt, obwohl keine bauliche Trennung im OSM-Sinn verliegt. Auch hast Du bei Deiner Auftrennung die dort in OSM eingetragenen Busrouten überhaupt nicht berichtigt. So geht das nicht!
Ich habe Deinen Änderungssatz daher wieder vollständig zurückgesetzt.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-01-06 21:08:58+00:00): Boas contribuições Andril!. Feliz 2020, qualquer dúvida contacte
pio2_122 (2020-01-06 16:02:14+00:00): Komentarz o treści "nic" stoi w sprzeczności z tym co zawiera ten zestaw zmian...
maraf24 (2020-01-06 17:21:05+00:00): Zmiana prędkości na liniach kolejowych - ciekawe na jakiej podstawie?
user_5359 (2020-01-06 16:39:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please? I know that you are working with StreetComplete, just asking the house number is unfortunately a "feature" of this tool.
korolenok (2020-01-08 15:27:36+00:00): Hi!
Not sure about the existence of this monument (NODE: 7107665991)
Could you please clean it up?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79254457
Hb- (2020-01-08 19:13:38+00:00): I saw it on TV! Thanks for your remark. I changed the tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7107665991 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79353006
korolenok (2020-01-09 13:54:50+00:00): Does this mean that you need to put on the map all the news happening in the world?
The node was removed from the map
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79254457
visage (2020-01-11 19:07:38+00:00): This is a single road. Why do you feel that splitting it up like this is the best option?
CanalBelt (2020-01-13 23:11:06+00:00): Hi visage. I split the road because it is physically separated: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways. I've changed it back to a single road with an added turn restriction since that seems to be the preferred modeling in South Africa.
visage (2020-01-14 09:25:06+00:00): Thanks for the update.
I agree with the divided roads convention but in this case it is a bit of a grey area since the road is only physically separated at the access control booms.
The new update looks great.
Thanks for all of the work!
ajf3934221 (2020-01-06 21:56:19+00:00): Hallo! Auch hier ist doch aus dem Baum keine zweite Grillstelle geworden?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79254843
ajf3934221 (2020-01-06 21:57:40+00:00): Hallo Hier hast Du den Baum in das Haus eingebaut, diesen habe ich wieder an seinen Platz geschoben.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79254890
pangoSE (2020-01-15 08:16:40+00:00): Välkommen till OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79255032
ajf3934221 (2020-01-06 21:54:43+00:00): fehlte eben nicht, habe diese Dublette wieder entfernt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79255153
eggie (2020-01-06 17:01:17+00:00): Dag hamaryns,
Je hebt oneway=no toegevoegd.. Dat hoeft niet. Dat kan dus er weer af. oneway=no tag je alleen als je bang bent dat iemand oneway=yes gaat taggen. Denk aan parallelfietspaden.
oneway:bicycle=no "moet" ook weg. 
(Dat betekent eenrichtingsverkeer.. uitgezonderd fietsers) nvtp hier. 
Net als de fixme.
Doe je het zelf?
Dit waren je edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79255195
MVG,
Eggie
frosm (2020-01-06 16:05:11+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
est-ce une route résidentielle ? si oui quel est son nom ?
ou c'est une voie de déserte pour le batiment qu'elle longue ?
bonne continuation
Carto_Ferret (2020-04-14 00:01:43+00:00): Hello FDO44, thank you for mapping! I noticed on some highways you have been adding access=no and yet there are some vehicles present in ESRI World Imagery or OpenStreetCam (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/747368027, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459155101, & https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756327495). Based on the following OSM guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access), access=no restricts access to all users without another access tag like foot=yes. I am curious if you have any information to indicate that these roads are now closed to all traffic?
frosm (2020-01-06 16:12:51+00:00): bbonjoru et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
pour la longue liste des activités sportive, plut'ot qu'une description, il existe l'attribut sport (avec les valeurs en anglais hélas, je ne sais plus par coeur si l'éditeur propose une liste traduite)
pour le site web, renseignez le dans l'attribut website :)
pour les heures d'ouverture, cliquez sur le i pour voir la documentation, cela vous ouvrira la page du wiki qui propose un éditeur graphique dans la section "voir aussi"
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Bonne continuation
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-04-03 03:44:15+00:00): I don't know where did you get that Romulo Highway (Route 55, or PH-55 in the way you say it) is moved to Ninoy Aquino Avenue in this edit. The DPWH still assigns that route to Romulo Boulevard, so I reverted it.
DP24PH (2020-04-05 21:30:53+00:00): Thank you very much for letting know about it, and I apologise for these dubious blunders that I have made in the previous edits 3 months ago.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-04-08 22:37:03+00:00): No need to say that, but why would you move Route 55 into Ninoy Aquino Boulevard?
DP24PH (2020-04-11 05:46:27+00:00): Because of editing blunder that I have made, and moved by mistake.
flohoff (2020-01-07 12:42:18+00:00): Moin,
warum hast du das haus "An der Kiliankirche 6" von eienm building=yes zu einem area=yes gemacht? 

Ist das keine Gebäude mehr?

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79255907
flohoff (2020-01-07 12:43:07+00:00): Und das mit dem verschieben von dem Baum an der Wegetalstraße in den Hinterhof verstehe ich auch noch nicht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79255907
clangohr (2020-01-08 08:29:11+00:00): Guten Morgen auch das war nicht meine Absicht. Wollte keine Änderung ausführe.
Gruß
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79255907
mueschel (2020-01-07 19:37:15+00:00): Please make sure you don't upload your internal QA markers('dupe') to the OSM database!
cxc (2020-01-08 08:01:37+00:00): can you be clearer?
I can't understand where I have to correct
thank you
mueschel (2020-01-08 08:55:15+00:00): Hi,
it was this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1764349975/history
I already removed the tag 'dupe' you added yesterday.
cxc (2020-01-08 09:00:16+00:00): oopppss ....
sorry, I don't understand where it comes from ....
many clicks, too many ...
thank you
cxc (2020-01-08 09:06:46+00:00): sorry for the question
but what do you mean by QA markers?
a personal tag?
mueschel (2020-01-08 09:17:06+00:00): As I understand it, this 'dupe=n1234523' tags are from some kind of validation tool used by mapwithai and Kaart.
I don't know why this ends up as a tag on nodes, but in all cases I found the mapper didn't add it manually and wasn't aware of having added this tag.
frosm (2020-01-06 16:32:24+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
je ne comprend pas le sens de votre modif concernant l'ajour d'un point supplémentaire pour votre gite.
est-ce que le gite concerne les 2 batiments ? est-ce que les 2 batiments ne sont qu'un seule batiment ?
par ailleurs, le nom du point semble est pour moitié une description.
par ailleurs quel type de gite est ? l'un des 2 renseigne une maison d'hote (ce qui implique que vous etes sur place) l'autre renseigne un chalet/meublé à louer (sans votre présence donc)
Gîte Chaneü (2020-01-08 18:11:07+00:00): Bonjour, oui le gîte concerne les deux batiments, nous sommes un gîte d'étape et de séjour, nous sommes sur place l'été et l hivers nous sommes ouvert uniquement sur réservation. 
Je voulais mettre un point pour être plus visible. Le petit batiment c'est notre épicerie-bar. Merci de valider ces informations.Cordialement. Mme Jacob
mueschel (2020-01-07 18:09:22+00:00): Hi Hendrik,
1232 of these trees have a "spieces" tag instead of "species". Could you have a look?

Thanks!
freeExec (2020-01-10 07:22:50+00:00): Не нужно писать в имя дополнительную информацию, там только имя. Изменения отменены.
Syl (2020-06-22 07:56:28+00:00): Bonjour, l'arrêt Vallée est introuvable sur le terrain, il y a bien un arrêt de la STAR proche mais aucune mention d'Illenoo ou de BreizhGo. Peut-on le supprimer ou le fusionner ?
mga_geo (2020-06-22 12:01:55+00:00): Cet arrêt est indiqué sur la ligne 121 de BreizhGO : https://www.breizhgo.bzh/itineraires-et-horaires/horaires-ligne?form_id=bz_line_schedule_form&operator=ILLENOO1%7C19&line=4576&destination=2&date=2020-06-22
Syl (2020-06-23 11:54:35+00:00): Ok, j'ai donc supprimé l'arrêt inexistant et copié le tag ref:FR:illenoo sur l'arrêt préexistant.
G1asshouse (2020-01-10 07:48:07+00:00): Is this the correct capitalization of a business' name for OSM? The wiki for "key=name" wasn't clear in relation to business name representation. The strip mall's billboard and the business' awning both show "bok a bok". The business' website also stylizes their name with all lower case.
Adamant1 (2020-01-10 09:00:54+00:00): Hi G1asshouse (interesting? name). The rule of thumb with brands is usually to follow the one the ground rule by going with what it is on the places sign. In this case, it seems to be lower case. 

Although, in a lot of other locations with this brand it isn't. For instance if you look at the store fronts on their websites location page the ones that are Bok Bok Mediterranean are in capital letters. 

https://www.bokbokchicken.com/locations/

Although, there it lacks the A in the middle. Which makes me think it might actually be different brands. Which is probably why the person was confused about the capitalization. I think that's confirmed by the fact that this is bok a bok #4. My guess is also that the social media links are wrong. Check the Yelp page. I'm guessing its for the correct brand and should be saved, but everything else linked to isn't and shouldn't be.
Adamant1 (2020-01-10 09:06:30+00:00): Let me correct that. Everything is correct. The user just confused this with https://www.bokbokchicken.com/ But then they kept the A. So, I don't know. I'll probably create a name suggestion index entry for both of them so hopefully this doesn't happen again.
Adamant1 (2020-01-10 09:27:30+00:00): Btw, there's a not: namespace tagging scheme for tagging what something isn't. In this case it would be not:name 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:not:
seattlefyi (2020-01-10 18:33:30+00:00): Yes, this is a local chain, with the 'A'. I went to the Seattle business's own website, and they even have it multiple ways there. I picked the one that appeared most often, and most official, and fits with normal convention. Yes, it's lowercase in their logo, but I think while the spelling on logos can be authoritative, the capitalization is often just for the logo and not how they refer to themselves (e.g. Amazon & Facebook (lowercase) and Potbelly Sandwiches (all caps)).
Adamant1 (2020-01-11 00:41:13+00:00): Alright then. Like I said above, usually we go with what's on the actual store sign for brand names, but your local and I rather deffer to that in this case. Even if I think its wrong. Its not like it matters that much anyway. It might be different they were large national chain, but with only four restaurants it doesn't really matter. Although, it would be good if all the places at least were spelled the same way. So if you feel like renaming the other ones to match this one if you haven't already that would be good. I assume they are all in Seattle.
G1asshouse (2020-01-24 09:04:15+00:00): Thank you both for your thoughts. Thinking about all of the points made, I agree that there isn’t a locally based reason to keep a lowercase spelling of the business name. The global uniformity of OSM data is of more importance in this case. (Adamant1 – "G1asshouse” is inspired by the Billy Joel album “Glass Houses”.)
lann (2020-02-05 06:30:21+00:00): Sur les noeuds 1993044370, 1993044366 et 7112686367 c'est quoi le tag node ?
ça donne des erreurs dans keep it right : https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=76&error=133341373
Libre à Quimperlé (2020-02-06 10:16:24+00:00): C'est une erreur.J'ai mis à jour les adresses 12 et 14 mais le tag node ne devrai pas être là.Je suis en cours de mise à jour des adresses sur Quimperlé.Merci de m'avoir signaler le problème.Je vois que c'est pour l'instant la seul adresse qui pose souci.J'ai supprimer le tag node.Je corrrige mes erreurs avec http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/
lann (2020-02-06 18:45:23+00:00): Merci de ton retour.
Oui osmose c'est bien pour les erreurs.
J'utilise également Keep it Right parce que ça donne d'autres types d'erreurs
Encore merci
4004 (2020-01-12 20:59:47+00:00): здравствуйте Елизавета. сомневаюсь, что дома там и правда замки белоснежки или золушки (у них вообще не было замков, кстати). что вы хотели нанести?
4004 (2020-01-12 21:05:20+00:00): reverted in 79487591
stefanct (2020-06-04 13:14:04+00:00): Hi Radu, ich habe bemerkt, dass du sehr oft in deinen Edits den name-Tag falsch verwendest, so wie hier. Der name-Tag dient zur Benennung von Dingen, die einen eindeutigen Namen haben, *nicht* der Beschreibung oder Kategorisierung (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name), da sie keine zusätzliche Information betragen. D.h. "Picknick" oder "Aussicht" sind nicht OK und sollten entfernt werden (und noch wichtiger: nicht weiterhin hinzugefügt werden ;). Es wäre toll, wenn du deine Änderungen der Vergangenheit korrigieren könntest.
LG
Vinber (2020-01-08 08:47:46+00:00): Hello,
thanks for your contributions. But please don't delete addr:housenumber, because we lost the informations.

For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6032672723

12 is lost.

if you want, you can copy node then let 7 in adress number and let's only beauty shop inside building.

Regards
Vinber (2020-01-08 08:52:54+00:00): Sorry I didn't look hard enough, it's ok you duplicate node !

My bad
RodrigoVi (2020-02-18 10:38:27+00:00): no problem! 
It's better to dissociate address and poi; addr:country and addr:city are useless.
Sorry I didn't answer before: sick
Jo Cassel (2020-05-03 07:44:10+00:00): Hallo Dirk!
Dass dort renaturiert wurde ist klar,
aber kann es sein, dass Du mit deinem OSM-Rückbau per iD die Wanderwegsrelation zerschossen hast?

https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=18!51.3159!9.4494

Gruß Jo
celsius11 (2020-05-03 15:39:53+00:00): erledigt
ndm (2020-01-06 22:04:24+00:00): This looks like it needs to be reverted -- should be using ESRI clarity as specified in the Bristol wiki entry -- previous data was a better fit to the middle lane.
Mike Parfitt (2020-01-07 11:01:01+00:00): Please give an example node where the gps tracks are inconsistent with my positioning and I will investigate further.
Mike Baggaley (2020-01-08 09:52:57+00:00): Hi, when adding prow refs, please do not also add them in the name field, just use the prow_ref field. If a way has no name, just leave it blank.

Thanks,
Mike
user_5359 (2020-01-06 19:13:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A highway restarea inside of a building? Really?
freebeer (2020-01-07 07:29:29+00:00): unfortunately this is the mapper's first and only edit so far, so it's not clear if their background is in a country where maps.me sees high usage and an Autobahn amenity is frequently abused to tag a park-bench or similar.  with no user description, hard to tell.

or a completely different common maps.me issue.
mueschel (2020-01-08 12:03:48+00:00): Please make sure to add street names using the proper 'name' tag. Take care when doing copy and paste!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283791569/history
felipeeugenio (2020-01-10 17:51:31+00:00): Thanks.
ndm (2020-01-06 22:02:09+00:00): This probably needs reverted -- a motorway juntion tag has been deleted -- and roads should really be split where they are physically separate.
Mike Parfitt (2020-01-07 10:46:52+00:00): Which node held the motorway junction tag ?  I'm happy to fix that.
Mike Parfitt (2020-01-07 20:49:02+00:00): Reinstated the 3 valid tags on node 309474.
southglos (2020-01-07 22:02:43+00:00): Just noticed this one too.  I don't think the southbound carriageway should be split so early - they're not separate parallel roads, it's just one road with lane markings, and it's possible and legal to change between the two halves right up until just before the physical split.

I'd be inclined to put the junction back where it was, and tag the run-up to the actual split with turn:lanes=left|through|through
Mike Parfitt (2020-01-08 12:13:20+00:00): By marking the boundary between the motorway and the off-lane the Highways Agency is encouraging drivers to think ahead and get themselves positioned.  Many take this hint, moving outwards as soon as the dashes start.  Some don't and put themselves and others at risk by swooping from the overtaking lane into an off-lane at the last possible minute.  By matching the OSM ways to the road markings, navigators and satnavs can provide better positioning advice to drivers.
southglos (2020-01-08 13:58:45+00:00): A laudable aim, but that's deliberately mis-mapping things for the benefit of satnav prompts.  If we start splitting roads whenever we want drivers to get into the correct lane, we'd have an absolute chaos of parallel ways all over the place.  You'd not suggest splitting every roundabout approach into multiple separate roads, would you?

We should split the road at the point it actually becomes two - I'd say where the solid white line starts just before the physical split (i.e. where it was).  The prompts for satnavs should come from a turn:lanes tag on the stretch beforehand.
Mike Parfitt (2020-01-09 15:09:34+00:00): No, it isn't a mis-mapping.  It is reflecting how things really are on the ground.  Check the gps traces.  What I have done is to reflect actual usage and road markings.  I will revert my changes if you can show me the section in the Road Traffic Act which says something equivalent to "when an exit taper is provided (a widening lane seperated from the ongoing carriageway by a dashed white line) drivers must not use this lane until the dashed white line is replaced by a solid white line"
southglos (2020-01-09 15:51:06+00:00): That's not what I'm arguing at all.  I'm arguing that in OpenStreetMap we don't normally split roads unless they're physically separated.  The stretch of road before the exit slip is a single piece of road, with three lanes, with the lane 1 marked up as being for the exit.  It's not two separate roadways; there's no physical barrier between lane 1 and lanes 2 & 3.

The fact that lane 1 is the lane to be in for the exit slip should be represented with a turn:lanes tag, not by splitting the road into two parallel ways.

If you'd advocate splitting roads like this, the correct lane to be in for this exit is actually signed all the way back from half-way down the M4 exit slip, here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=kQwq2jnZsbizH0QlpU3w2A&focus=photo - why not split the lane out all the way from here?  It would be an unholy mess.

I'm not disagreeing that lane 1 is for the exit, I'm not disagreeing with the GPS traces, I'm just saying that the convention in OSM is to split ways based on physical separation, not just on white paint.

"How things are on the ground":  https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=ztnEcQVRmeVlVdm6EKQFIA&focus=photo - to me, that's a three lane motorway with lane 1 having a different destination to lanes 2 & 3, not two physically separate parallel roads.

The turn:lanes tag is for exactly this kind of situation:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn
Mike Parfitt (2020-01-10 22:16:00+00:00): Your statement that "I'm arguing that in OpenStreetMap we don't normally split roads unless they're physically separated" is too grand a claim.

Your statement that "We should split the road at the point it actually becomes two - I'd say where the solid white line starts just before the physical split (i.e. where it was)" is contradictory, because the solid white line starts about 150-200 metres before the physical split.
SomeoneElse (2020-01-10 23:47:44+00:00): (apologies for barging in here, but someone not in the edit history PMed me about it).
Generally speaking "in OpenStreetMap we don't normally split roads unless they're physically separated" is normally correct - where roads are split into lanes they'd normally just be one road with lanes tagged on them (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Turning_indications_per_lane etc.)
Maybe mention it on talk-gb to get a wider set of opinions including from people familiar with the area - which I'm not?
Best Regards,
Andy
Mike Parfitt (2020-01-14 08:55:54+00:00): Topic raised in talk-GB as similar motorway junctions will crop up elsewhere.
Adam Franco (2020-03-11 06:11:30+00:00): Hi waderoe, thanks for your contributions to OSM. I'm not sure if this was intended, but this driveway got added to a "site" relation which doesn't have much effect. You should probably remove the relation. Here's more info on site relations: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:site&uselang=en-US
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/79260777
km2bp (2020-01-07 17:30:02+00:00): Mapa idealna aż miło popatrzeć. Ja zwiększam dokładność mapy w swym mieście  poprzez przypinanie do obiektów na mapie wszelkich informacji na ich temat znalezionych w sieci w pierwszej kolejności oficjalna strona WWW  potem Wikipedia a następnie informacje ze stron typu Foto-polska, Polska na fotografii, Wieże ciśnień w Polsce  ( Każdą z nich polecam bo to kopalnia wiedzy o mieście lepsza niż Wikipedia) Ale to nie wszystko  linkuję też blogi podróżnicze i krajoznawcze ,  Własne zdjęcia Artykuły z gazet albo filmy na YouTube nawet do tak mało znaczących obiektów jak przejazd kolejowy   https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2309862145  Pozdrawiam i życzę owocnego Nowego Roku w zwiększanie dokładności mapy. Nie traktuj mego komentarza jako przechwałkę tylko jako inspirację. Wszystko wyjaśniam w tym filmie. https://youtu.be/FGANRXZWiYM
webdruide (2020-01-08 14:06:40+00:00): Hallo Galbinus,
Das das ein Bewirtschafteter Wald ist, ist nur zum Teil richtig. Von Hidessen die Lopshorner Allee bis zur abknickenden Vorfahrt, weiter auf der Stoddartstr. bis zum ersten Parkplatz aufd der rechten Seite ist es ein Naturschutzgebiet. Ein Hinweisschild befindet sich am Parkplatz, an der lopshorner Allee und ein weiteres bedfindet sich auf dem Parkplatz Stoddertstraße. Bilder vom Naturschutzgebiet mit GPS Koorodinaten kann ich als Beweis vorlegen. Auch liegen dort umgefallene Bäume, die dem Verrotungsprozess unterliegen. Bitte dieses wieder korregieren.
Gruß webdruide