piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-06-14 22:17:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
praeteritum (2022-08-07 05:04:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124583216.
praeteritum (2022-08-07 05:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124583212.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-07 02:04:40+00:00): Why did you delete the route relations, instead of finding their names?
restored.
robert (2018-08-05 15:01:59+00:00): Did you mean to remove "Glamis Court" in this edit? It broke a match against the OS Locator dataset: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=962521
GinaroZ (2018-08-05 16:25:11+00:00): Hi, yes I did. The road was added in 2008 but in all of the aerial imagery available it's not visible. In the latest Bing imagery from May 2017 it looks like it's part of a new school.
woodpeck (2018-06-15 07:53:21+00:00): Es ist zu unterscheiden zwischen dem Namen eines Gebäudes und dem Namen eines Geschäfts, das das ganze Gebäude oder den Teil eines Gebäudes innehat. Die allermeisten Geschäftsgebäude haben gar keinen Namen, und dann taggt man oft sowas wie name=Migros direkt an das Gebäude. Wenn aber das Gebäude einen Namen hat, und das scheint mir hier der Fall zu sein (unter Architkten zumindest ist der Namen "Feldpausch-Haus" offenbar ein Begriff: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theo_Hotz "Seit dem Ende der Achtzigerjahre errichtete Hotz mit ... dem Feldpausch-Haus ... Bauten frei von historisierender Nostalgie.") dann sollte man den Namen des Gebäudes im name-Tag des building=*-Objekts haben und den Namen des Geschäfts in einem separaten Objekt, was ja in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/693318563 gegeben ist. Langer Rede kurzer Sinn, ich denke, hier hat d_berger recht: Dieses Gebäude heisst nicht "PKZ Woman". Zwar ist nicht von der Hand zu weisen, dass das Gebäude auch als Bekleidungsladen eine gewisse Bekanntheit hat ("Der Flagship-Store an der Zürcher Bahnhofstrasse ist das grösste Schweizer Modehaus überhaupt" behauptet die Webseite), aber ich denke, im Vergleich zu der bauhistorischen Bedeutung muss die gegenwärtige gewerbliche Nutzung hintanstehen.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-06-20 03:35:03+00:00): revertido. usuário criou vias umas sobre as outras. por favor, faça da maneira correta.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-06-20 03:34:30+00:00): revertido
eggie (2018-06-15 05:27:40+00:00): Dag Schoenenreus... Dit lijkt me een keurige correctie. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-06-15 05:28:55+00:00): Wat je nog wel kunt doen is de bron  source=3shapes veranderen in bv source= local knowledge of pedok achtergrondfoto.
Josef73 (2019-03-23 10:32:10+00:00): Hallo, gibt es den Fotograf in Rostock in der Rungestraße 16 noch?
Josef73 (2019-03-23 10:32:32+00:00): Node 601440245
seattlefyi (2018-06-17 06:17:00+00:00): Thanks for the edits! It was great that you didn't just delete the old node. In the iD editor you can select "All Tags" and delete or replace incorrect tags one at a time. I merged your new node with the existing node, and cleaned up some of the tags. Thanks again.
Omnific (2018-06-17 16:37:37+00:00): Hey, just for future reference, map apartment complexes as residential landuse if it's an area and not just one building. Otherwise, the whole area shows as a building. Good edits though.
skquinn (2020-01-22 23:31:41+00:00): Re: Ascension NXT -- shop=psychic does appear to be the best fit based on the shop's website. Please note shop=yes no longer shows up on the default OSM Carto layer.
viloan (2018-06-15 00:37:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2019-03-28 03:43:40+00:00): Hi,

Node 5691927269 .... has a name=100 bull ridge road... that looks like an address ... but it will not be used .. because it does not have the correct tags.
Hjart (2018-06-15 07:52:34+00:00): Du fik ikke lavet anbragt noder alle steder hvor stierne krydser hinanden. Dette har jeg fikset.
ralley (2018-06-16 10:35:32+00:00): Description is wrong, this was actually Wairoa rural not just Bartlets
mueschel (2018-06-16 16:50:22+00:00): Hi,
could you check this area? It has many strange tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8383011

Jan
rivermont (2018-06-15 03:20:21+00:00): Intended title: Consolidate residential property parcels from Fresno County GIS import into large residential landuse.
rivermont (2018-06-15 03:20:28+00:00): Intended title: Consolidate residential property parcels from Fresno County GIS import into large residential landuse.
keithonearth (2018-06-16 06:10:36+00:00): Awesome, thanks!
rivermont (2018-06-15 03:36:44+00:00): Intended title: Consolidate residential property parcels from Fresno County GIS import into large residential landuse.
user_5359 (2018-06-15 14:26:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
McRegt (2018-06-15 04:34:56+00:00): This is the fix for separating the footway from the zoning node. See feedback 59841260.
eggie (2018-06-15 05:35:44+00:00): .. en dan zou van dat gebogen wandelpad nog af moeten footway=sidewalk, want het is geen trottoir. 
en is die aanvulling nog steeds een bug in iD. Volgens mij als je voor wandelpad kiest komt die extra tag niet mee.
De meeste ervaren mappers gebruiken editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2018-06-15 05:38:38+00:00): De node heb ik wel net losgemaakt van de landuse.
McRegt (2018-06-15 08:34:59+00:00): Check, ik ga die editor vanmiddag eens bekijken.
yumean1119 (2018-09-26 16:11:02+00:00): はじめまして。主に岡山県でOSMの編集を行っているyumean1119といいます。
三重県内を詳細にマッピングされているようで感服しています。

ところで、伊賀コリドールロードをはじめとして、広域農道として建設されたとみられる道路をhighway=secondaryとタグ付けされていることを発見しました。現在のタグ付けの指針では、これは専ら主要地方道ではない都道府県道(基本的には3桁の番号のもの)に用いることになっており、市町村道や広域農道で2車線ある道路はhighway=tertiaryとすることになっています。(下記を参照ください。)特に異存がなければ、タグを修正させていただきたいと思いますが、よろしいでしょうか。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging
yumean1119 (2018-10-04 18:28:00+00:00): 次の道路について、地理院の標準地図タイルで三重県道ではないことを確認した上でタグを修正しました。
・伊賀コリドールロード
・グリーンロード
・北勢南部広域農道(フラワーロード)
・中南勢広域農道(ビーフロード)
・農免農道
machGoGoGoさんの折角のマッピングを無に帰すようなことになってしまい恐縮ですが、マップの正確性を高めるためにやむを得ずこのような処置をとらせていただきました。

もう一点追加。変更セットのコメントがすべてfixだけになっていますが、これでは編集の意図が分かりにくくなってしまいます。より具体的な記述、例えば「三重県津市の道路を編集」を心掛けるとよいでしょう。wikiの「変更セットの良いコメント」も参考にしてみてください。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%89%E6%9B%B4%E3%82%BB%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%AE%E8%89%AF%E3%81%84%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88
muzirian (2018-06-16 10:16:51+00:00): You have moved a highway and changes doesn't look true to any imagery sources.Can you check and revert?
Halloween123 (2018-08-14 13:27:54+00:00): I have reverted it.
Thank you.
aharvey (2019-10-11 01:01:29+00:00): You've added this tag to every node of the way, it looks like you've used select all in JOSM. Could you please fix this?
maraf24 (2018-10-04 21:58:25+00:00): "it will not render on the map."
Why not? It is at map creator's discretion to render place=country.
Howpper (2018-10-06 03:09:33+00:00): Because it is an unrecognized country.
maraf24 (2018-10-06 18:19:02+00:00): Ok, but how renderers know about this fact?
Is the tag place=country you used reserved for unrecognized countries?
user_5359 (2018-06-15 14:10:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
letihu (2019-03-05 10:24:16+00:00): Die Kreuzungen mit anderen Wegen und Wasserwegen sollte noch verbessert werden.
Hier z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194916492/history#map=16/52.8582/7.6378
mavl (2019-07-21 06:41:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-06-15 07:53:45+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! You asked for a review of this, so here it is.

It's great too see businesses add details. We don't really use "descriptions".

*but* you've one beginner mistake, you added the details to a road! This way/line ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23578413 ) is the R139 road. What's right is to add a point where your shop is, and add those details there (and then remove the details from the road). Am I making sense?
freebeer (2018-06-15 10:35:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59870819 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus spamvertisement spammy spam, thanks rorym
sportszonedirect (2018-06-15 10:44:18+00:00): Hi rorym, sorry for the mistake. I will try to fix it this end. Eric
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-06-15 11:11:35+00:00): @freebeer I don't think it's fair to (repeatidly) call it spam. It's an honest mistake from a new user. 2/3 of the tags entered weren't spam, and were useful contact information if added to a shop. description tag shouldn't really be in OSM, but there are 1,100,000+ entries of that already.

Cut the new user some slack.
freebeer (2018-06-18 05:45:29+00:00): Yes, you are absolutely correct.  My trigger-happy response was due to this `newbie' mistake being repeated dozens of times in the US (and more around the world) by SEO spammers looking to get their client's names on the map, rather than honest individuals.  Here the street name was not changed, which should have clued me that things were different, had I looked closely.
The revert was a quick way to restore the road back to normal, since one would have to create a new POI in any case starting anew (you can't really transfer useful tags added in error to the road to something else trivially), the idea to restore anything damaged like the name.
As nearly all I do nowadays relates to improper advertising, I too often get mistakes made by individuals mixed in with the SEO spammers who have never replied to these changeset comments, and as it's obvious from this exchange that this is decidedly not the case, and I withdraw my form-letter accusations reserved for true abusers.
As I do not see anything yet added to the map after taking a short break, nor evidence of anything being added, is there something I can do to help add the business appropriately at the correct address?
eggie (2018-06-15 07:07:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-15 07:09:49+00:00): Dit is een correcte edit. Leisure=park als losse "cover". 
mapse verder..
woodpeck (2018-06-15 07:56:08+00:00): Hallo, ich habe diesen Editwar in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59861459 kommentiert. Würde Dich aber bitten, auch bei Meinungsverschiedenheiten mit anderen Mappern respektvoll umzugehen und bei Uneinigkeit Dritte hinzuzuziehen (Forum, Mailingliste o.ä.) statt einfach "EOT" und "ich habe recht" zu schreiben ;)
eggie (2018-06-15 08:54:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-15 08:24:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-15 08:27:36+00:00): Probeer concreet commentaar bij je edits te zetten svp. je hebt twee wegen verwijderd . ben je je er daarvan bewust
eggie (2018-06-15 08:30:36+00:00): Ik heb de wegen op de parkeerplaats hersteld.
eggie (2018-06-15 11:20:28+00:00): Het zalencentrum was als zodanig ook al getagd, maar wanneer het de naam van het gebouw kan dit wel zo blijven.
tuxayo (2018-06-15 12:16:03+00:00): Salut, un bout de la rue d'Aix est en doublon.

Sur la Rue Francis de Pressensé je fais un passe de validation et ça à détecté ça aussi ^_^

Les deux morceaux de rue ne sembles pas avoir de relation. Donc peut importe lequel je supprime c'est bien ça?
FrançoiseR (2018-06-15 12:40:53+00:00): Bonjour, oui bien sûr tu peux en supprimer un. Ce matin JOSM s'est planté en cours d'édition (j'ai jamais vu ça), espérons qu'il n'a pas fait d'autres doublons lors de la reprise. 
J'ai découpé la rue pour rendre compte du bout de piste cyclable sur la place, et d'ailleurs je réalise qu'il faudrait changer le nom de cette portion de voie...
tuxayo (2018-06-15 20:25:02+00:00): Ok merci je vais corrige le doublon de rue! :)
tuxayo (2018-06-15 20:26:18+00:00): > espérons qu'il n'a pas fait d'autres doublons lors de la reprise. 

Apparemment oui :P

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59872879

Vive le validateur, du coup c'est même pas un soucis à corriger. (imagine chercher à la main dans la liste des objets du changeset suspect...)
Kachkaev (2018-08-04 22:20:15+00:00): Привет, спасибо за правки в Октябрськом! Я заметил, что контуры домов немного не совпадают с очертаниями зданий на спутниковых снимках и уточнил их. Ещё добавил недостающий тег у пары зданий и починил разрывы в линиях.
Вот моя правка: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61363072

Если будет желание отметить границы территорий вокруг домов, а не сами здания, для этого применяется тег landuse=residential: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
letihu (2018-06-22 07:08:34+00:00): Beim Abtrennen von Grünflächen sollten die Wege z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28035917/history
aber mit den anderen Straßen verbunden bleiben ;-)
SirKingIke (2018-06-22 07:24:47+00:00): Danke für deine Korrektur!
berndw (2018-06-15 08:28:56+00:00): Natürlich nicht Oberkassel, sondern Niederdollendorf ;-)
Vinzenz Mai (2022-11-11 08:11:26+00:00): Hallo,

bei dieser Relation handelt es sich um den Bahntrassenanteil des Wendelinus-Radweges, der ebenfalls als Relation erfasst ist und unwesentlich länger ist. In meinen Augen könnte diese Relation gelöscht werden.

Beste Grüße, Vinzenz
eggie (2018-06-15 08:32:55+00:00): Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse. Je edits zullen worden teruggezet. 
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
eggie (2018-06-15 08:37:42+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #59868419 

Ik zal je een welkomstmail sturen per PB. Svp geen landuse omtaggen naar een functie.. zie uitleg hierboven.
eggie (2018-06-15 08:34:19+00:00): Ook de surfacetag van deze changeset kan er weer af. Een Leisure=park geeft de functie aan en de landuse ligt daar al onder.
eggie (2018-06-15 08:39:37+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #59868402

wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. Wat is je motief voor deze acties?
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
BCNorwich (2019-01-18 09:34:48+00:00): Hi, your building all have to be tagged building=yes for them to have meaning in OSM database. The tag name=Edificio has no meaning to the database and is ignored by most if not all rendering software.

Regards Bernard
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:45:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Conormap (2018-06-28 11:20:55+00:00): What is the reason for the series of non-existant highways leading onto pedestrian areas around the town?

While I understand that some see OSM as primarily functional for routing, etc. it should also serve as a map that can aesthetically guide people, as traditional maps did. Isolated pedestrian areas are highly relevant to this and can be responsible for confirming a location is that which they're now in, due to distinctive shapes, etc.

I think there was a rise of third-party utilities that provided collective OSM goals, such as highlighting highways that don't connect to the the wider highway network and incentivising users to make them connect. I understand the logic but I think the incentive has overlooked the damage this causes to certain map uses and may misguide those reading a map. For example, I've seen highways drawn to pedestrian areas at junctions that were dangerous to cross and may well have frustrated anybody relying on that way in the belief that the map showed actual features of the junction.

I have also seen it stated the OSM is ultimately a collection of connected highways and any isolated highways fails in this goal. Personally I believe this is nonsense. How would this equate with wanting to map old mountain tracks that are highly useful to hikers but have long worn out their connection to the existing road network? I believe they should be mapped but any ways drawn to suggest a link to main roads or paths would be misleading and may endanger hikers. Etc. It made sense in the beginning of OSM but has matured to the point that it is far more nuanced now.

Apologies if this is a bit long-winded but I've seen so many pedestrian areas linked to roads by non-existant paths or highways and usually it's done to prioritise routing (without actually helping it much) and causing damage to traditional map reading techniques. I'm happy to be corrected.
Geofreund1 (2018-07-04 19:41:12+00:00): Every router relies on a contiuous graph from the starting point to the destination. This is the reason, why quality assurance programs like Osmose request to connect parking areas or  pedestrian areas  to streets. This should be done for footways  by connecting to highway=crossing (and not anywhere on the higway) if appropriate.
Since the OSM Project does not provide any maps (data is put into a database only), the renderer has complete control what it likes to show on the map. So in your case it might suppress any "stub" highways which are only put in for routing reasons in order not to congest the map. But again: this is dependent on the renderer`s behavior.
So please feel encouraged to be more active and correct things you find improper or wrong. But be aware that other mappers will correct you, too.
Conormap (2018-08-01 15:23:36+00:00): I understand your point Geofreund and did mention similar as reasoning I'm familiar with. I also understand the drive to fulfil and correct as best a routing system as possible. But one of my points was that it is a flawed goal that came from an archaic principle of OSM that was once pertinent but it has outgrown (that all routes must connect. See an example above for just one reason that is not realistic as a map becomes more mature). Routing is incredibly important but it is not the only functionality of a map. Forgive me if I'm repeating myself but the ability to visually read a map has significant worth in itself. I'm not questioning whether one is more important than the other but suggesting that bettering one aspect should not harm, disintegrate or molest another. Creating highways that do not exist is harming the visual reading of a map, no matter what size they are.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:52:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:58:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:29:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].