piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
ivanbranco (2022-10-05 19:55:25+00:00): Ciao geggella, benvenuto su OSM!

Un appunto riguardante gli alberi, il tag name=* si usa solo per i nomi propri, non per descrizioni o altro (in questo caso la specie/genus). Quindi il campo name=* va lasciato vuoto. Volendo puoi usare species:wikidata o genus:wikidata, così diventa subito chiaro a chiunque utilizzi il database che albero sia anche se non conosce l'italiano. Se hai domande fai pure!

Buon mapping!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
cartofy (2022-09-22 13:50:51+00:00): Hello
Welcome to OSM! I see that you've been editing buildings across the map and that's a great start. However, I've noticed that even though you have been using Bing Maps as the imagery, your buildings do not match the imagery. Have you read the guidelines about drawing buildings? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling
If not, please do. I also noticed that your buildings are snapped to roads. When you do this, then that is incorrect. Roads never touch buildings in real life, do they? They go under or above maybe but do not touch buildings. Please go through the beginner's guide to OSM before making any further edits: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Also, I noticed all of your changeset comments say "newedit". That is not a descriptive changeset comment. You should always describe what you are editing, why you are editing, etc. Please read through https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments to understand how to add meaningful changeset comments.

Remember that OSM is a community effort, and is used by millions of people, companies and organisations worldwide so it is important that your contributions are meaningful. If you are not sure of how to proceed, please approach the OSM India community https://community.osm.be/resources/asia/india/
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
nlehuby (2022-09-24 08:58:34+00:00): Bonjour,

les modifications apportées sur les bus ne me semblent pas très claires : a-t-on vraiment un arrêt de bus Marquis avec juste à côté à moins de 5 m un autre arrêt de bus nommé Plessis ?
Quelles lignes passent à ces arrêts ? La ligne de bus crée (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14609446) n'est pas assez détaillée : s'agit-il de la ligne 6, de la 5 ou de la 30B ?

Merci
Aradrin (2022-09-24 09:18:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui, il y a bien deux arrêt avec des noms différents l'un à côté de l'autre (2 panneaux séparés du côté pair, 1 seul panneau du côté impair).
L'arrêt sur la ligne 30B est appelé Marquis, l'arrêt sur la ligne 6 est appelé Plessis. Il semble qu'il y ait un arrêt de la ligne 5 appelé Marquis quelque part, d'après le site de Transdev, mais je n'ai rien trouvé sur place.
J'y étais en début d'été, mes photos sont assez imprécises mais c'est que je pu en tirer.
nlehuby (2022-09-24 16:29:13+00:00): ok, merci pour les infos ! J'ai complété les infos de la relation créée pour indiquer qu'il s'agit de la ligne 30B https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14609446
t_ja (2022-09-22 19:00:53+00:00): Ahoj,
aky je zdroj tejto zmeny? Na danom mieste si urcite nebol, lebo by si vedel, ze pred tvojou zmenou to zodpovedalo skutocnosti. Na Ortofotomozaike taktiez nie je vidiet, ze by koncil vlek az pri chate - lebo nekonci.

Preto ma vazne zaujima, na co je dobre takto "domyslanie" si dat...
LanovkarJ (2022-09-23 06:37:22+00:00): ahoj, původní záměr byl jen změnit tag, k tomu posunutí došlo zřejmě omylem.
velice se omlouvám a přeji pěkný den.
skyper (2023-02-14 19:29:30+00:00): Hallo RxFreiburg,
warum änderst Du denn `sidewalk:right=separate` zu `sidewalk=both`? Wenn Du angeben willst, dass auf der linken Seite auch ein Trottoir existiert wäre `sidewalk:left=yes` der richtige Tag.
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
lololailo (2022-09-22 13:34:32+00:00): Eliminadas partes de una edición poco precisa del Castillo de Alhama https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111018795
Añadidas torres, puertas, aljibes, escaleras, acceso peatonal y acantilado al Castillo
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-22 13:30:03+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=30.389744%2C-86.479183%2C15.90
somix (2022-09-22 19:01:16+00:00): Hi. It's better to use Latvia - orthophoto LVMGEO imagery, rather than Bing
parsd51 (2022-09-23 15:42:36+00:00): Hej 

Vil du fortælle mig det forkerte i cycleway=no?
Som jeg forstår dokumentationen fortæller det at der ikke er en adskilt cykelsti eller en markeret del af vejen. 
Ud fra anden tagning er cykling stadig tilladt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway=no

Bemærk at OSM er en database over faktiske forhold, som ikke skal tilpasses diverse fejl i navigationsprogrammer.

Hilsen
Per
habi (2022-09-22 20:27:18+00:00): Mersi fürs Erledigen!
Frans S (2022-09-22 14:43:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126506053
PT-53 (2022-09-22 15:06:53+00:00): Hallo Säsäsä,
was ist denn die Quelle für Deinen Gebäude-Eintrag?
Fragende Grüße
Säsäsä (2022-09-22 18:32:13+00:00): ich war da und habe genau dieses Haus besucht. Die eingetragene Größe passt sicher nicht, da im Satellitenbild alle grün gefärbt ist. Vor 50 Jahren war das Haus übrigens auch schon da. Einfach mal vorbeigehen.
Gruß Säsäsä
PT-53 (2022-09-23 13:49:41+00:00): Hallo Säsäsä, 
ich bin heute dort vorbeigefahren und habe - ab dem Haus. Nr. 23 bis zum. Geb. 35/1 - Bilder angefertigt und bei 
imgbb hochgeladen. Hier die Links dazu:

https://ibb.co/dfWC22Q
https://ibb.co/6HNrTXq
https://ibb.co/8BLmXtD
https://ibb.co/LRDcRTC
https://ibb.co/j6sZFWM
https://ibb.co/xfQxdTv
https://ibb.co/3kcHn6D
https://ibb.co/VqDg9gr
https://ibb.co/Z2wVVCr
https://ibb.co/2F9CYFX
https://ibb.co/Bc8SJGF

Ich kann dort, wo Du das Gebäude eingezeichnet hast, keines erkennen. Du mußt Dich da irgendwie vertan haben.

Grüße
Säsäsä (2022-09-23 15:40:48+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
Du hast recht, ich hab mich durch den veränderten Parkplatz und meine Gps-Aufzeichnung beirren lassen. Das Haus, um das es ging ist #25. Habe meinen Eintrag gelöscht.
Vielen Dank, Säsäsä
PT-53 (2022-09-23 16:00:57+00:00): Kein Problem.
Grüße
Frans S (2022-09-22 14:41:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126506407
Tsu-Yi Su (2022-09-22 14:49:02+00:00): Thank you very much for the feedback and reminder! I will make sure to be more careful the next time.
DressyPear4 (2022-09-22 18:56:39+00:00): Olá, não delete vias sem corrigir a relação, essa rota de ônibus agora ficou com um buraco.
Se tiver duvidas peça ajuda para alguem da comunidade
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126506460
DressyPear4 (2022-09-22 18:57:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14310017
LockOnGuy (2022-09-22 16:02:32+00:00): Thank you! keep up the good work!
Casey_boy (2022-11-29 16:46:17+00:00): Hi, 
With regard to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/647893109 I would recommend using the historic=battlefield tagging scheme: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dbattlefield

I think it would also be useful if you included the source you used. It's not clear what battle happened there without it.

Thanks.
Casey_boy (2022-11-29 16:46:57+00:00): Apologies, that should be https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6478931096
Casey_boy (2022-11-29 16:50:37+00:00): Ah, I see you only edited the node (changing date to note) rather than creating it. I'll post on the original changeset.
طائر الجنوب (2022-12-22 17:52:45+00:00): احسنت استاذ
Nawfal85 (2022-12-23 18:03:17+00:00): مشتاقين ابو علي
fndoder (2022-09-25 19:51:45+00:00): Вопрос про https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204622212

Улицы этой нет в реестре улиц города, на местности нет ни одного дома с адресом по ней.

Я сомневаюсь, что нужно возвращать ранее удаленный тег name.
Глеб (2022-09-25 19:55:04+00:00): убрал
Frans S (2022-09-22 14:57:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
You mapped just 1 building here.
2 issues:
The black line on the left is the shadow on the ground. Don't include it in your mapping.
On the right, the white part is a part of the wall and shouldn't be included in the mapping as well.
If you want to map accurate, the roofline need to match the footprint. 
You could also map the annex.
Best regards



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126506917
Frans S (2022-09-24 08:49:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Just 1 issue here. You let the residential area cross 2 buildings. You can avoid those issues when you run the validation tool and solve these issues before you upload your mappings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126507251
Frans S (2022-09-22 14:35:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
I reviewed nearly all your mappings, they show the same issues as described below.
Please do not upload every single mapped building. Collect a number of buildings before uploading them.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126507351
chiho_kang (2022-09-23 10:46:24+00:00): source: http://hangulize.org/
It is a site that automatically translates Ukrainian into Korean according to the Korean law on how to write Ukrainian in Hangul.
danieldegroot2 (2022-09-25 10:19:50+00:00): addr:housename "Market Gate Apartments" sounds like a name or description.
Frans S (2022-09-22 14:38:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126508024
user_2066394 (2022-09-22 15:23:00+00:00): Vermutlich eher parking=surface statt paeking=street_side für den Parkplatz?
Patr1k_P (2022-09-24 18:32:45+00:00): este co sa tyka toho prestahovania, nabuduce sa snaz zachovavat historiu objektov, takze treba sa snazit upravovat, presuvat a podobne...zmazanie a nasledne vytvorenie noveho nie je moc dobry koncept
Frans S (2022-09-22 14:58:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126508666
Frans S (2022-09-22 15:19:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.

* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126509066
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Rogoyski (2023-05-04 21:32:04+00:00): Znaki give_way mają tutaj sens, skoro jest sygnalizacja świetlna?
Tetryk (2023-05-07 19:03:14+00:00): Moim zdaniem mają swoją wagę bo odwracają pierwszeństwo na rondzie jak nie działają światła.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
citrula (2023-09-19 20:14:57+00:00): Hello,
How did you choose whether to add bicycle=designated to ways? I have a particular question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/562379216/ , which is marked as 'designated' without any signage indicating such, and would be quite hard to bike down
pkoby (2023-09-19 23:30:37+00:00): I based tags for cycling on Austin's dataset of bike infrastructure. Any trails denoted as cycling-allowed I tagged as bicycle=designated. However, on-the-ground is better than armchair, so feel free to adjust as necessary.

Is the Canyon Creek Nature Trail actually access=private, though? That would suggest that no member of the public could use it, and a web search (and the city database) would suggest otherwise.
citrula (2023-09-20 01:54:35+00:00): At each of the trailheads there is a map which indicates the trails are residents only. The park itself is owned and managed by the city of Austin, but the trails are on a greenbelt which I believe is owned by the HOA.
citrula (2023-09-20 01:55:11+00:00): The map board looks pretty new so the access rules might have changed recently.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-22 15:16:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, you did not square any building with the Q key.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126509437
Lejun (2022-09-23 09:45:09+00:00): Ha, you were quicker than me. Thanks for the job!
aceman444 (2023-01-08 16:38:34+00:00): Zdravim, napad dobry, naozaj ako hrad ma byt oznaceny cely areal s hradbami. Ale naco do multipolygonu, a kvoli tomu rozsekat vseky budovy a hradby? Vy multipolygony zjavne milujete, ale je to teraz neprehladne a lahko Vam to niekto narusi alebo prerusi spojitost nejakymi upravami po obvode. Kludne to mohlo byt riesene jednou suvislou ciarou po obvode. Tak ako je Kralovsky palac.
Britzz (2022-12-27 21:24:38+00:00): Attention à ne pas rajouter des adresses quand elles existent déjà. Sur ce changeset vous avez créé https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10045242724 alors que https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/706245856 est pré-existant et plus précis ("entrance" ajouté)
Branko Kokanovic (2022-09-23 16:22:45+00:00): iz nekog razloga je ova izmena potrgala liniju 77 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2648176), tj. obrnula je redosled way-eva u relaciji (neki sa pocetka su otisli na kraj). Ispravio sam u https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126555649, ali ako znas bilo sta sto si neobicno radio ovde, javi. Jurimo koji je ovo bug u iD-u!
Badojo (2022-09-23 16:31:48+00:00): Pa popravio sam članove jer koliko se ja sjećam prvi član 77 prema Zvezdari  je bio (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526501620) a ja sam dodao ovu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526501585) što ima više logičnog smisla u odnosu na poziciju platforme. Jedino sam valjda zaboravio poravit redosljed članova u relaciji
Badojo (2022-09-23 16:36:29+00:00): Ali to se odnosi samo na taj jedan way pa ne znam zašto bi ID odjednom mjenjao više njih
Branko Kokanovic (2022-09-23 16:57:27+00:00): stavio je taj tvoj novi i jos 5-6 njih posle njega skroz na kraj. Ima neki bug tu, ali hvala - mozda ovo pomogne iD maintainer-u da provali sta je. Sad znamo da mora da se menjaju way-evi u relaciji da se nesto cudno desi!
zstadler (2022-11-23 17:18:58+00:00): Hello Yitzchak,

In the future, please avoid using the "name" tag as a summary of other tags.

In this edit, the "operator" and "colour" tags weer used to form the "KKL red" name.

Thanks,
Zeev
Yitzchak M (2022-11-23 17:56:12+00:00): Hi Zeev,

Understood!

Yitzchak
RolandHUN_Mapper (2022-09-23 15:41:27+00:00): Sistem osiguranja kvaliteta je ukazao na neispravne oblasti. Popravio sam ovo.
Zdravo. Roland
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
zstadler (2022-09-24 13:02:06+00:00): Hello Yitzchak,
"KKL red" and "KKL black" are not appropriate values for the ref tag
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref

Please avoid the use of tags in order for something to show in a given map or another.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer
Vizelren (2022-09-23 12:31:47+00:00): В соответствии с указом Губернатора Псковской области от 16.05.2022 № 72-УГ с 01.06.2022 Администрация Псковской области переименована в Правительство Псковской области.
Hufkratzer (2022-09-23 12:29:04+00:00): Hi, ich habe den Ponyreitplatz als pitch umgetaggt, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz
GinaroZ (2022-09-29 21:43:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding these details. I've fixed the "Sat"->"Sa" here. If you are doing surveys it's worth turning on the map notes layer https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/56.3966/-3.4446&layers=N to see if there's any notes you can help resolve in Perth.
Ferrocarriles de México (2023-08-01 20:38:37+00:00): Aquí cambiaste parte de lo que no es autopista a autopista. Fíjate en http://gaia.inegi.org.mx/mdm6/ antes de etiquetar a una autopista.