piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-07-07 14:09:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
jqngarcia (2020-07-07 09:19:03+00:00): Bon Dia:
Si vols millorar la visibilitat de la teva edició, caldria que possis el tipus de edifici que has mapejat, com building=industrial.
Així es visualitzaà en Carto.
Salut i Mapes, JQN
Jose Luis Infante (2020-07-07 10:50:41+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva edició, sobretot per què no és gaire habitual afegir fàbriques. Cal que ho revisis, ja que duplicar el mateix element com un punt i com un àrea no és correcte. El més correcte seria deixar l'àrea i esborrar el punt.
Tot i així, com diu JQN, etiqueta'l com building=industrial, i esborra area=yes.
Pots afegir més informació, com man_made=works i product=furniture (i product=machinery a l'altra edició), i dades de contacte, com l'adreça o el telèfon/web/email.
Salutacions!
ACarlotti (2020-07-11 16:16:33+00:00): Should the individual ways now be tagged as "railway=construction" and "construction=rail"? This would then cause them to appear on the main rendering on the website (similar to how the line from Bletchley towards Bicester is currently shown).
R0ckhopper (2020-07-12 08:20:53+00:00): Yes they should, sorry wasn't sure if changing the tag would do that or not. And didn't know how easily to change all the individual ways (at least for Phase 1 not 2A or 2B) to construction. 

There should be an updated dataset following Royal Assent (minor changes such as longer tunnel in a few places). I can request this if someone else can upload it to OSM.
GinaroZ (2020-07-07 14:53:02+00:00): It's obviously not a tunnel but does the path connect across the road to the garden centre?
Traddles (2020-07-07 15:00:07+00:00): That's what was so bizarre about a tunnel being shown. There is no aid to crossing this busy road. Not even a traffic island. Hence, OSM now reflects the situation on the ground.
RicoElectrico (2020-11-03 12:58:45+00:00): Cześć, podobno to już jest inny sklep - sprawdziłbyś?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2406122

Dzięki!
InsertUser (2023-10-09 11:36:37+00:00): Do you have a source for this name? the website linked indicates that it is for a different park.
TomJeffs (2023-10-09 11:51:21+00:00): I think I made a mistake, thanks for highlighting it. I'm unable to correct it for a few days.
user_11452467 (2020-07-07 11:16:12+00:00): Hi KarmaCleaner.
Why have ripristinated our chengeset?
Frans S (2020-07-10 16:51:15+00:00): Thanks for your mapping efforts on this project.
 validators review  mappings of a mapper to check if the mappings are in accordance to the HOTSM quality standards.
From the 284 buildings you mapped on several tasks 227were reported as Inaccurate mapped and not squared.
A further look learned me that your mappings are a bit sloppy.
This frustrates the job of validators who have to correct all these mappings. It cost so much more time to correct them rather than map them correct in 1 session.

An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S (2020-07-07 14:08:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
Luzandro (2022-07-26 09:47:09+00:00): Hallo,

bitte bei Flurnamen etc. aus der basemap etwas skeptischer sein. Abgesehen davon, dass die Position nicht ganz stimmt, ist das Maibründl keine locality, sondern diese Quelle hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/695430090/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87642312
ma-rt-in (2020-07-10 06:07:03+00:00): Hallo,
wenn du schon die Status der Brücke von Baustelle zu Weg änderst, dann bitte auch das construction=* nächstes mal entfernen.
vg
aceman444 (2020-09-11 20:43:06+00:00): Removing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6394289254 seems to be a mistake, you merged a bus platform with a stop_position which now does not match the roles in the bus relations. Anyway, the nodes should not have been merged. Please fix it.
aceman444 (2020-09-11 20:51:56+00:00): I fixed that node and made it a platform on the neighbouring footway, but there are other stops to fix at that bus station. I added a note.
balint36 (2020-09-11 21:21:36+00:00): Yes, I've merged because there are only stop postitions in the bus station.
aceman444 (2020-09-12 19:38:21+00:00): But then they can't have the role 'platform' in the bus relations. They would have to have 'stop' role. But 'stop' nodes are optional in bus relation, 'platform' are more important for the bus relation to work. So basically having only stop_position nodes and no platforms on a bus stop is useless. I see that bus station only has stop_positions, but then it should be converted to also have platforms, not removing platforms.
balint36 (2020-09-12 23:00:41+00:00): I mean there are only stop postitions IRL. Originally I set the role to 'stop' in the relation, then later somebody changed it.
aceman444 (2020-09-13 14:50:33+00:00): Then there would be no place for people to wait for the bus (the platform), then what use would there be for the bus to stop there and of the whole bus station. A bus relation with only stops would be invalid and useless in public transport schema 2. See also e.g. relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9599208 where all bus stops have the platform role and only the Autóbusz-állomás (at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7650790999) would be with 'stop' role.
LorenzoStucchi (2020-07-08 08:51:07+00:00): Ciao,
Benvenuto nella community di OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap non è solo una mappa ma è un gruppo di persone che contribuisce puoi entrare in contatto con la comunità usando diversi canali, in questa mappa li trovate tutti riportati. https://openstreetmap.community/

Ciao e ancora benvenuto in OSM,
LorenzoStucchi
fghj753 (2021-04-11 21:11:18+00:00): Tere / Hello,

Since you seem to be local mapper, do you mind revisiting this changeset area regarding those fixme-tags on trees? After consulting with other mappers, I think correct tag should be man_made=planter instead of natural=tree.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dplanter

Also, i don't know how accurate or up to date imagery is, but best imagery choice in this scenario (iD and recent changes) is Estonia Cadastre layer. However, new survey might be needed, because aerial images were taken during lockdown.
Zipperok (2021-04-12 06:43:20+00:00): Thanks for the comment.
I will go to this place shortly (this week) and check again.
eggie (2020-07-07 11:26:35+00:00): Welkom bij OSM
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnodes.
MVG,
Eggie
limmmoh (2020-07-07 09:22:53+00:00): Added a Driveway according to Private Maxar Imagery
user_11115677 (2020-07-07 20:41:33+00:00): landuse=forest für ein Gewerbeobjekt?
müllers (2020-07-08 15:54:14+00:00): Hallo soilinvestigator83, 
danke für den Hinweis. Vermutlich (???) war "landuse=forest" bereits eingetragen. Durch eigene Unaufmerksamkeit beim Ergänzen von Daten wurde diese Eintragung nicht korrigiert.
Nochmals vielen Dank + eine schöne Woche 
müllers
boldtrn (2022-10-03 07:53:29+00:00): Is there actually a a sign forbidding motor_vehicles on that road?
HaStMe (2022-10-03 07:59:06+00:00): Yes, as written in my comment - I took a picture to ducument
HaStMe (2022-10-03 07:59:48+00:00): But I know people are ignoring it...
boldtrn (2022-10-03 08:14:14+00:00): Ok, thanks for the clarification, I just couldn't find any other information on this closure, so I was wondering.
HaStMe (2022-10-03 11:14:30+00:00): I guess you want to follow the ACT Italy, right? If: I followed the road on my second trip and it worked without any issues.
Nevertheless: The sign exists
HaStMe (2022-10-03 13:22:06+00:00): I guess you want to follow the ACT Italy, right? If: I followed the road on my second trip and it worked without any issues.
Nevertheless: The sign exists
boldtrn (2022-10-03 13:52:46+00:00): Thanks, it was reported in our forum:https://forum.kurviger.de/t/osm-kartenfehler/7497
ika-chan! (2021-03-12 06:06:20+00:00): You need to be careful not to just merge ways: there are lots of ways with lighting data and those without, and most editors do not give warning about merging ways with lighting data and no lighting data.
trigpoint (2020-07-07 09:38:38+00:00): The names you are adding appear very odd, what sources are you using?

Cheers Phil
xJuji_x (2020-07-07 09:44:56+00:00): What are the names ment to be
trigpoint (2020-07-07 10:18:44+00:00): Most houses don't have names, but if they do it will be on a sign. Otherwise the name/housename field  should be left unpopularited.
Normally just the addr:housenumber field is populated with just the number.

Cheers Phil
BeKri (2020-07-08 22:56:35+00:00): Cool ;-)
Das wollte ich auch schon umsetzen ...
Es wird wohl noch viel zu tun geben ;-((
BeKri (2020-07-08 22:58:19+00:00): Geht gleich weiter ...
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/muenchen-jeans-kaltenbach-insolvenz-1.4961226?reduced=true
user_2066394 (2020-07-09 09:48:10+00:00): vom mapping her nur ein präfix, wirtschaftlich natürlich ein desaster. mal schauen wie das weitergeht
Владимир К (2021-05-30 20:38:41+00:00): очень много ошибок. используйте валидатор JOSM, почитайте вики
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-13 14:49:19+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7691231250 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3177640 ?

Dalej to istnieje?
Jean-Marc Liotier (2020-10-23 10:18:21+00:00): Tous ces magasins sont enregistrés en tant que office=government - c'est évidemment une erreur. En outre, ils sont tous en majuscule - ce qui est également une erreur.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87647513
chnav (2020-08-24 15:25:11+00:00): Теги для дома исправил, колледж и описательное название удалил.
DaveF (2021-10-28 14:49:06+00:00): Hi
What is South Bristol Way cycle relation?
Is it official? I can find no online references to it.
Is it sign posted or is it just a collection of shared pavements you've put together?
slowtux (2022-02-20 21:55:34+00:00): Hallo,
finde keine Hinweise dafür, das Ort und PLZ falsch waren. Büscherheide ist zwar ein OTeil von Bad Essen gehört meiner Meinung aber postalisch zu Preußisch Oldendorf.

mfg
Gregor
Frans S (2020-07-07 14:00:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-08 10:58:45+00:00): Hello.  A remark. I asked you to map more accurate! Please take your time to map properly.
See my remarks other changesets.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87649472
sovereign_ch (2020-07-08 20:16:30+00:00): Was ich überhaupt nicht ausstehen kann, sind solche verlogenen "Ja, mach' mal"-Änderungen, die irgendwelche Apps vorschlagen. Ich weiss nicht, ob ich dir empfehlen soll, einen Augenarzt aufzusuchen, oder SVG und SSV zu lernen. Bis zum spezifisch gemappen Punkt ist _keine_ Einbahnstrasse. Und survey ist IMO schlicht gelogen (oder du bist ein extrem unaufmerksamer und entsprechend schlechter Autofahrer).

Sorry, not sorry. Cheers
itos (2020-07-17 08:58:21+00:00): Es ist noch schlimmer. Ich habe mehrere Jahre an der Brahmsstrasse 16 gewohnt und ich habe im Wissen um die Einbahnstrasse die Liegenschaft mit dem Motorfahrzeug immer in Richtung Einbahnstrasse verlassen. Das Schild auf Höhe Ausfahrt der Tiefgarage Brahmshof ist ja präsent. Kartiert habe ich auf Höhe Brahmsstrasse 6, das Schild Einbahn vor Augen. Ja ich hätte nochmals zur Albisriederstrasse zurückgehen sollen, doch für mich war die Situation klar.

Inzwischen habe ich mich überzeugt, dass die Einbahnstrasse erst erst auf Höhe Ausfahrt Tiefgarage Brahmshof beginnt. Das hätte man mir aber auch mit etwas weniger Getöse mitteilen können.

Viel Dank für die K orrektur, stephan
sovereign_ch (2020-07-19 23:12:28+00:00): Sorry für das Getöse, ich hatte dich als (nur-)Ostschweizer Mapper auf dem Radar, und in diesem Fall "nochmal einen", der (halb-)blind irgendwelchen stupiden Tools vom Sofa aus folgt. Tritt gehäuft in Zürich auf, wo gerne auch Expats mappen möchten, die keinen Schimmer von Strassenverkehrsgesetz, Signalisationsverordnung oder überhaupt CH-Rechtsordnung und lokalen Usanzen haben, sondern "einfach mal machen".

In Zürich ist "improveosm.org" ziemlich unbrauchbar, da Urmütter und Urväter garantiert kein Navi am laufen haben, um aus "ihrer" Garage zu fahren. Aus vielen Sammelgaragen darf gegen die "gefühlte Richtung" ausgefahren werden. Und die 99.9995% Navi-Nutzer sind nur Garant für technische false-positives.

Zudem haben wir immer wieder besonders intelligenzgesegnete Sofamapper, die explizite oneway=no wieder rauslöschen, weil es gegen deren Weltbild verstösst. Verstösst wiederum gegen meine Stadtzürcher Logik, dass eine Strasse abseits der Hauptachse _nie_ selbstverständlich twoway ist.

Tut mir leid, dass ich dich als vernunftbegabten Mapper etwas angefahren habe. Gibt leider zu viele, die nur noch das "Sync-Button"-Drücken in iD oder das "suggested autocomplete" in StreetComplete kennen, und mehr Schaden anrichten, als helfen.

LG, S.
user_6110846 (2020-07-09 13:00:24+00:00): не можна видаляти 
треба disused:shop=haidresser писати
user_6110846 (2020-07-09 13:02:21+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:disused:
ququruzka (2020-07-09 14:37:06+00:00): грамотей, читай викивнимательно.

"Используйте префикс пространства имён disused: на тегах, которые относятся к объектам, находящимся в пригодном для использования состоянии (или требующим незначительного косметического ремонта), но которые в настоящее время не используются. Например, пустующие или заколоченные пыльные магазины или неиспользуемые автостоянки. "
там уже другое заведение.
user_6110846 (2020-07-16 14:50:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2841395934
о так треба спитай спільноту
VictorIE (2020-07-11 12:51:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. :)

When mapping highway=stop, it's good to make sure that the node is part of the way that represents the road. That way, routing software know to include it.
Heinz_V (2020-12-03 07:26:28+00:00): Most of the ways which you created here are useless.
Jordi MF (2020-07-08 18:09:28+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for your contribution. However, in this changeset you made a mistake. It's not right to write the reference of the road in the "name" tag. So, I deleted it. The reference of the road (CV-755) must be written only in the "ref" tag.
Regards,
Jordi
user_5359 (2020-07-07 20:14:59+00:00): Hello! For better description of your business please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare (see Carti Cancer Center) .
ToniE (2020-07-07 11:17:20+00:00): Hello branib,

Are these roads really open to the public?
I doubt, I've seen signs that access is limited to taxis and ... but not for all.

By removing 'access=no', you opened these roads for all kind of traffic - 'psv=yes' is superfluous now, simply saying "anyone can use this and also public service vehicles'.
ToniE (2020-07-07 11:22:12+00:00): On June 30th, I've seen here (and have photos) a sign which denies access to all kinds of vehicles. I unfortunately cannot see the "exceptions" below the sign - photo quality is poor.
branib (2020-07-20 05:51:25+00:00): Hi ToniE,
Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies for the delayed response. I have mistakenly modified the access tags. Thanks for the quick correction. I will make sure to perform my future edits very carefully with all the available resources. Once again, thanks for clearly explaining the issue and making the necessary changes. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks&Regards,
branib
akalohri (2020-07-09 07:08:03+00:00): #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
ndm (2020-07-07 22:48:40+00:00): A large segment of administrative boundary seems to be added to the South Bristol Way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106446518#map=15/51.4335/-2.6318) was this intentional?
zuicz (2020-07-15 11:45:35+00:00): Czy piesi też mogą się tędy poruszać?
zuicz (2020-07-15 11:46:14+00:00): Dobra, już znalazłem artykuł na ten temat ;)
Lalilalulalam (2020-07-16 05:08:23+00:00): Nawet w temacie masz "rowerów i pieszych" (:
zuicz (2020-07-16 09:32:26+00:00): Racja, ale oznaczone było jako sama droga rowerowa ;)
abakus_uploader (2020-07-07 22:30:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
pio2_122 (2020-07-09 11:18:15+00:00): Skąd informacja o takim zamkniętym odcinku?
Ja znalazłem taką informację https://www.facebook.com/161771391067455/posts/711055339472388/ - a więc od wysokości budynku z nr 95 do nr 68
Źródło, które podałem jest dość wiarygodne i logiczne. Mógłbyś zatem poprawić zamknięty odcinek wg niego?
Z góry dziękuję!
Kalooo (2021-09-09 13:12:24+00:00): In germany, just because there is a bicycle lane does not mean that cyclists are not allowed to use the roadway. There are many exceptions, such as multitrack vehicles, unacceptability of the bicycle lane, closed formations, etc., so bicycle=no should not be used.
4x5 (2021-09-09 14:10:22+00:00): The presence of a cyclepath does not necessarily imply that cycling on the parallel road is not allowed. Thus, "bicylce=no" should only be used if cycling is explicity not allowed = if sign 254 "Verbot für Radfahrer" is present.  https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Zeichen_254_-_Verbot_f%C3%BCr_Radfahrer,_StVO_1992.svg
DP24PH (2020-07-10 08:17:45+00:00): Change log: Metro Manila Skyway Stage 3 tweaks on completed partial concrete pouring and layering correction

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Kindly comment down here.

Much love,

DEARPAUL24
Frans S (2020-07-07 12:16:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the objcect is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In Josm keep the Ctrl key down
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
ID`s (2020-07-07 12:24:58+00:00): Найс!
kuhni74 (2021-06-07 15:43:26+00:00): Die "cliffs" sind als Umhüllende der Felsregion statt als die Abbruchkanten eingetragen - das ist meines Wissens nicht der Sinn der Sache, oder?
SKald (2021-06-11 11:35:59+00:00): Nein, sind sie eigentlich nicht... Kennst Du die Türme dort?
kuhni74 (2021-06-11 16:44:41+00:00): Ich kenne sie nicht direkt, aber die "cliff"-Linie ist tw. auch am Fuß der Felswände eingezeichnet statt an der oberen Abbruchkante - halt eher "rundherum".
SKald (2021-06-11 18:32:40+00:00): Woraus schliesst Du das? Luftbild? Dann würde ich erst mal einen Lokalaugenschein empfehlen...
Die betreffenden Wände sind fast senkrecht und auch keine Steilküste, sondern Zapfen resp. Türme. D.h. da gehts bestenfalls um wenige Meter zu einer "Abbruchkante", die für sich schon bei diesen Geländeformen mE so gar nicht existiert, resp. keinen praktischen Wert hat, ganz abgesehen davon, dass ich kein, für OSM verwendbares, Höhenmodell kenne, dass dafür genau genug wäre.