piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2017-01-30 19:53:21+00:00): ID zet vermoedelijk automatisch
footway=sidewalk erbij. In werkelijkheid is er geen sidewalk, en is een bug in ID. Wil je hier in de toekomst proberen rekening mee te houden? Ik heb de tag inmiddels verwijderd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk
Владимир К (2017-02-03 10:02:59+00:00): Проверьте тут адреску, я поправил более менее
mavl (2017-10-13 18:23:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
Владимир К (2017-02-01 08:47:10+00:00): деревья лучше обводить по кронам, а не по земле где они растут
chnav (2017-01-30 18:39:34+00:00): Я нанес здание мотеля и мойку. Пожалуйста подождите обновления карт mapsme (по-моему раз в месяц) и не добавляйте больше рекламу, дублирование информации не требуется.
mavl (2017-10-13 18:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
Jojo4u (2017-01-30 22:11:36+00:00): Dear FrViPofm, I'm missing a detailed explanation of your edits regarding "species" which cover ten thousands of edits. Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct I would expect an entry on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/FrViPofm. Please consider stopping your work.
Miselajus (2017-01-30 22:53:09+00:00): Please choose smaller arears.  Lokal mappers should be able to regognize the objects you have changed.
Stereo_repair (2017-02-04 09:53:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45798879 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 04:30:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45838308 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 11:04:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45852519 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 12:08:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45853882 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-07 02:16:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45854666 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-07 03:18:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45872554 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
mavl (2017-10-13 18:24:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
mavl (2017-10-13 18:23:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
Alexey Vazhnov (2019-09-27 14:22:59+00:00): Мне показалось, что этот дом https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218331104 на улице Матросова — не 92, а 96. Поменял в правке https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74777616
trial (2017-05-04 10:53:48+00:00): Bonjour, encore moi, je vois que vous ajoutez des arbres en fonction de plans de construction ou de permis de construire. Ces objets ne sont là qu'à titre d'illustration et ne font pas partie des plans réalisés. Merci de ne pas polluer la base OSM par des données ne correspondant pas à la réalité, ni actuelle ni future. Si un jour un aménagement paysager a lieu, les plantations seront à ajouter. Pas avant.
trial (2019-06-13 10:30:26+00:00): corrigé
Alexey Vazhnov (2017-01-31 15:39:16+00:00): Откатил правку: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45688609
trial (2017-05-04 10:48:48+00:00): Si sur le plan de construction est écrit "Voie nouvelle", c'est qu'il s'agit d'une nouvelle voirie à construire. Pas qu'elle s'appelle ainsi.
Merci de ne pas ajouter de fausses informations.
trial (2019-06-13 10:29:00+00:00): corrigé
user_3216889 (2017-01-30 15:23:06+00:00): Voetpad zonder enige verbinding, miniem stukje grond omgezet naar 'park'. Onjuiste wijzigingen.
Revert middels 45654795.
eggie (2017-01-31 11:05:15+00:00): Hallo en welkom op OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken. Het is de bedoeling dat de werkelijkheid in kaart wordt gebracht. Ook een Pokemon speler kan waardevolle data inbrengen, mits deze voldoen aan de werkelijkheid. Uw edit zal gecontroleerd worden op vandalisme en zal om deze reden teruggedraaid kunnen worden.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
tomhukins (2017-02-01 19:17:36+00:00): Although your change fixed the "name", the "operator" retained the old, incorrect value.  I've fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45724788
pneff (2017-02-01 20:22:08+00:00): Oh thank you Tom, I had missed the operator tag entirely on this one.
ue0 (2017-01-30 13:16:03+00:00): *польскую :)
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:13:39+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
user_3216889 (2017-01-30 15:17:42+00:00): Teveel onjuiste/slordige wijzigingen.
Revert middels 45654643.
Karry (2017-03-01 07:55:59+00:00): Please, don't abuse OpenStreetMap, it is valuable community project!
Karry (2017-03-01 07:55:16+00:00): Please, don't abuse OpenStreetMap, it is valuable community project!
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:57:49+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Karry (2017-03-01 07:56:10+00:00): Please, don't abuse OpenStreetMap, it is valuable community project!
mavl (2017-10-13 18:23:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
user_3216889 (2017-01-30 15:14:49+00:00): Te veel onjuiste/slordige wijzigingen.
Revert middels 45654563.
user_3216889 (2017-01-30 15:09:55+00:00): Ten onrechte stukjes bos in park veranderd.
Revert middels 45654444.
mavl (2017-10-13 18:23:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
KempenNL (2017-01-30 13:35:38+00:00): Reverted due to wrong landusage
Gewijzigd naar http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45651899
naoliv (2017-02-14 13:28:29+00:00): Mapeiro, esse monte de restrição de retorno que envolve a própria via é desnecessário.
Uma restrição de retorno só faz sentido quando o caminho de origem e o de destino são diferentes.
Mapeiro (2017-02-14 14:09:53+00:00): É, as vezes eu coloco porque é só mais um clique no ID. Tem algum exemplo de uma restrição de retorno (U-turn?) que seja útil especificar?
Mapeiro (2017-02-14 14:10:22+00:00): Exemplo no mapa OSM, quero dizer.
naoliv (2017-02-14 14:40:03+00:00): Sinceramente nunca vi um caso no Brasil que envolva uma proibição de retorno que envolve a mesma via.
Por exemplo, aqui onde a PE-060 vira pista simples https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-8.37506/-35.03767 é um local correto para se mapear restrição de retorno envolvendo os dois sentidos da pista duplicada (a pessoa não pode virar de um lado da rodovia para o outro). A pista simples fica sem restrição.
Aqui também seria outro caso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370272279 onde uma restrição estaria correta (nesse caso em específico precisa quebrar esse caminho em 2 e mapear a restrição).
O único caso que vejo fazer sentido é se tiver uma ilha https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland no meio da rua, e essa rua estiver mapeada apenas com um caminho único.
Mas de toda forma, a restrição de retorno sempre deve envolver caminhos distintos, com algum tipo de separação entre eles.
mavl (2017-10-13 18:23:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
de vries (2017-01-30 13:53:01+00:00): hoi sereen666, welkom bij osm. Het lijkt er op dat je pokemon go probeert te beinvloeden door voetpaden en parken toe te voegen. zolang je alleen dingen toevoegt die ook echt bestaan is dit geen probleem. Maar je hebt een hoop fouten in je changesets staan. je heb bestaande landuses gewist en voetpaden over gebouwen getekend. ook betwijvel ik of alles pat jij als park gelabelt hebt wel echt een park is.
Ik ben bang dat al je wijzigingen tot nu teruggedraaid zullen moeten worden.

Lees hier hoe je op een zinnige manier aan de kaart kan bijdragen: https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-pokemon-go/
Als je vragen hebt kan je je tot het nederlandse forum richten: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
mvg
user_3216889 (2017-01-30 15:01:12+00:00): Te veel fouten in wijzigingenset.
Revert toegepast middels 45654214.
Commodoortje (2017-01-30 19:39:01+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
Cascafico (2017-01-31 09:29:56+00:00): Please, check on site before adding POIs
SomeoneElse (2017-02-02 00:01:49+00:00): Hello jseigneuret,
This changeset has been raised with OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group because it looks like a mechanical edit.
As described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct "The Automated Edits code of conduct must be followed at all times when performing Automated edits to the OpenStreetMap database".  The requirement for discussion is for a few reasons, including to allow people to suggest changes (if any are needed) and to allow data consumers to change the data that they look for.
Can you explain if this procedure was followed, and if so where it was discussed?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2017-02-02 00:02:09+00:00): Bonjour jseigneuret,
Cette modification a été soulevée avec OpenStreetMap Data Working Group parce qu'il ressemble à une modification mécanique.
Comme décrit sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Code_de_conduite_des_modifications_automatis%C3%A9es "Le code de conduite suivant représente un certain consensus partagé par ceux qui se préoccupent des éditions automatisées. Si vous ne pouvez pas ou ne voulez pas suivre ce code de conduite, veuillez ne pas faire tourner un bot ou faire de changement automatisée de grande échelle". L'exigence de discussion est pour quelques raisons, notamment pour permettre aux gens de proposer des changements (le cas échéant) et de permettre aux consommateurs de données de modifier les données qu'ils recherchent.
Pouvez-vous nous expliquer si cette procédure a été suivie et, le cas échéant, où elle a été discutée?
Meilleures salutations,
Andy Townsend, au nom du Groupe de travail sur les données d'OpenStreetMap.
jseigneuret (2017-02-02 07:57:06+00:00): Bonjour, cet édit a été fait avec une requête Overpass API et surement pas avec un BOT. Cet modification répond au condition d'intégration OSMOSE et n'est en rien une tache non réfléchi. J'ai fait deux requêtes pour mettre à jour les données comme défini ici
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals:direction. Les conditon requise sont: highway=traffic_signals + direction = forward dans un des cas et  highway=traffic_signals + direction = backward dans le dexième cas

Cette mise à jour a été faite avec une vérifications des points sur orhto photo et envoyé calque par calque depuis JOSM.

Merci de bien vouloir réintégrer cet édit.
Cordialement
SomeoneElse (2017-02-02 19:36:01+00:00): Donc vous n'avez pas discuté avec personne du tout? Https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Code_de_conduite_des_modifications_automatis%C3%A9es#Discuter_de_vos_plans dit: "Si vous planifiez de faire une édition automatisée, annoncez l'avant et parlez sur la liste de diffusion adéquate (une liste régionale, nationale, Ou internationale selon l'échelle de vos changements). "
jseigneuret (2017-02-03 11:14:27+00:00): Bonjour, cette discution sur la manière de tagué a été abordé en 2013. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2013-August/014582.html La page de traffic_signals a été mise à jour en 2016 et l'intégration à Osmose comme proposition d'intégration a été faite en cohérence avec cela. La mise à jour a bien été mesurée et vérifiée. J'aurais du, en effet, dire que j'allais m'occuper de mettre à jour le tag en question dont je suis déjà largement contributeur tous comme les highway=crossing... Pour moi la discussion sur la manière de taguer est actée et ce n'est pas un manque de respect que de mettre à jour un schéma. Le tag direction n'est plus proposé dans https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals. Il y a donc eu forcément discussion sur le sujet. Je peux cependant ajouter à mon journal cette intervention si cela s'avère nécessaire. Encore une fois, il n'y a pas d'automatisation sauf à rechercher des données pour les ajouter dans un calque avant traitement. Cordialement
SomeoneElse (2017-02-03 12:47:59+00:00): Bonjour,

> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2013-August/014582.html

Ce fil n'était pas de changer "direction=backward" vers "traffic_signals:direction=backward", et est venu à aucune conclusion (comme la plupart des discussions de liste "tagging").

Je ne comprends pas ce que "La mise à jour a bien été mesurée et vérifiée" signifie.

> Je peux cependant ajouter à mon journal cette intervention si cela s'avère nécessaire. 

Non, ce n'est pas suffisant. Https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Code_de_conduite_des_modifications_automatis%C3%A9es dit: "Si vous planifiez de faire une édition automatisée, annoncez l'avant et parlez sur la liste de diffusion adéquate". Vous ne l'avez pas fait.

Si vous ne le faites pas (ou si vous le faites et que les gens s'opposent à cette modification mécanique), ces changements seront rétablis.

Indépendamment de la façon dont une bonne idée d'un changement est, les gens comme les consommateurs de données doivent savoir sur un changement mécanique comme celui-ci. Si c'est une bonne idée les gens ne s'opposeront pas.
Meilleures salutations,
Andy Townsend,
mavl (2017-10-13 18:24:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
Fool2 (2017-01-30 13:35:22+00:00): is ok
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-08-04 04:56:10+00:00): I noticed this changeset in node1's history, and I personally think use node1 as null island is the best place.
Vincent de Phily (2017-01-30 15:29:08+00:00): Hurray for house numbers, and nice to see a Kilkenny mapper :)

Note you can also use http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet instead of http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:street . I prefer the former but opinions vary on which is best and you should at least be aware of the alternative.
tux67 (2017-01-30 14:12:14+00:00): Hallo misbi16,

willkommen bei OSM - prima, daß du mithilfst die loaken OSM Daten zu verbessern. Beim anlegen des Ärztehauses hast du das Tag amenety=parking verwendet, welches das ganze Objekt als Parkplatz mit Hausnummer ausweist. Für das Ärztehaus bräuchtest du ein Objekt mit den Umrissen des Hauses und ein separates für den Parkplatz.

Melde dich wenn du Hilfe brauchst. Gute Quellen sind auch das Wiki oder das OSM Forum.
Gruß
Stephan (tux67)
zors1843 (2017-01-30 19:49:27+00:00): Pokemon inspired ?
zors1843 (2017-01-30 19:50:06+00:00): More information please
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:13:32+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
user_5359 (2017-01-30 17:06:22+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
KempenNL (2017-01-30 13:38:12+00:00): Wijzingingsset 45650143 bevatte foutieve veranderingen. Wijzigingen omgedraaid. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45650143
mavl (2017-10-13 18:24:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
nevw (2017-01-31 04:47:27+00:00): I added traffic_calming=hump on Wellington Street just before Heddle Parade.
I added it just to the north of the junction. Hope this is correct side of intersection. I notice a node there with no tag, so thought that might be the correct spot.
BootROM (2017-01-31 04:50:11+00:00): Perfect, thank you. Am still new to this but hopefully I can help to fill in gaps for the new estates too.
mavl (2017-10-13 18:23:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
DaveF (2017-01-30 16:07:05+00:00): Hi
To check, is this way an emergency access? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464590688#map=19/51.37874/-2.32685

I saw a vehicle enter through the car park to get to the motor vehicle dept.
Spanholz (2017-01-30 14:59:32+00:00): Hi, 
openstreetmap.org is no playground, the data is used by many users and your changes are immediately visible for all of them. 
Your changesets have been reverted. 
Please refrain from doing such changes if future. Helpfull changes are always welcome! Thanks!
chippy (2017-02-12 21:45:17+00:00): You just deleted Node 1
chippy (2017-02-12 21:45:44+00:00): again
chippy (2017-02-12 21:46:48+00:00): Sorry, I mean, it had been deleted and restored previously :)
malcolmh (2017-02-12 21:58:44+00:00): You had created a duplicate of node 3815077900, which has been there since 2015.
SomeoneElse (2017-02-12 22:12:03+00:00): @chippy I don't think malcolmh created the duplicate - that was someone else trying to move an "important" node "somewhere important".  "node 1" has been on a few continents so far - I'm sure it'll get resurrected somewhere else at some point.  As for the NOAA buoy here - there has been no data from it for 45 days (see http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010 ). Either its minder left the administration with Barack Obama or it's sunk :)
chippy (2017-02-13 13:59:47+00:00): The history of node 1 indicates that it is frequently deleted and restored.

SomeoneElse: I did not say that malcolmh created the duplicate node. But malcolmh did delete Node 1 (as the only change) in this changeset which is the subject of this changeset discussion. 

I also don't think malcolmh was replying to me with the comment "You had created a duplicate" but if that was the case, that was an erroneous statement.
malcolmh (2017-02-13 14:18:42+00:00): I was replying to chippy! @chippy when you "restored" node 1, node 3815077900 was already in the database & had been since 2015. Therefore you had created a duplicate & that is why I deleted it.
SomeoneElse (2017-02-13 15:09:59+00:00): I'm just confused because it wasn't chippy that restored node 1!
malcolmh (2017-02-13 15:44:59+00:00): Sequence of events:
24/5/15: node 1 restored as a tree in DE
3/11/15: node 3815077900 created at 0,0
1/12/16: node 1 deleted
30/1/17: node 1 restored, this time at 0,0 - on top of node 3815077900. Later that day, I deleted it.

The mapper that has created this confusion is "glglgl", and his comment on changeset 45651079 suggest that he was just playing.
malcolmh (2017-02-13 16:06:44+00:00): Also, apologies to chippy, who I now realise was not the mapper who created the duplicate, only the mapper who raised the issue.
Geography Canada (2017-02-13 23:09:43+00:00): Node 1 used to be a tree in Passau..
mavl (2017-10-13 18:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52901900 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45647969].
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:13:22+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-30 17:18:50+00:00): Hi windstaff, welcome to OSM. You mapped many buildings in a previous changeset. May I know the reason behind deleting those buildings in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45652437