piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
iandees (2021-10-24 23:56:44+00:00): What is your source for these changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112917360
SpeedMcCool (2021-10-25 00:06:03+00:00): @iandees

The book "The street where you live : a guide to the place names of St. Paul." An archive copy can be found here: https://archive.org/details/streetwhereyouli0000emps/

I've been adding these to support the OpenEtymologyMap project at this address: https://www.dsantini.it/etymology/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112917360
iandees (2021-10-25 00:10:10+00:00): Gotcha, thanks for sharing. Looks like a neat project.
ElliottPlack (2021-11-23 14:28:28+00:00): Hi there, these roads are closed/removed, so they don't need to be edited.
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
user_115918 (2021-10-24 20:06:01+00:00): Thanks!
arvdk (2021-11-02 06:53:38+00:00): Maar bij 'White' staat ook gewoon Masha op de ramen. Hoe zit dat dan?
user_12625593 (2021-11-02 08:12:03+00:00): Hoi, dat weet ik dan ook niet. Nr 152 wijzigt blijkbaar nogal vaak van bestemming .. volgens KvK zitten er drie bedrijven zelfs.
Is dit nu dan een dependance van Masha?
arvdk (2021-11-02 10:15:14+00:00): Ja dat denk ik. Ik rij hier 2 keer per werkdag langs, ik kan eens aanbellen? Ik zie op oude Mapillary 'White' op de gevel staan. Dat is nu weg, dus die zal vast vertrokken zijn.
arvdk (2021-11-03 08:08:13+00:00): Ik heb gisteren iemand van Masha gesproken. "Masha café & restaurant" (nr 188) heeft niets te maken met "Masha Deluxe" (nr 152). Die heeft een andere eigenaar en is geen café of restaurant, maar een af te huren feestgelegenheid (partycentrum). Opent ergens volgend jaar.
user_12625593 (2021-11-03 08:16:17+00:00): Ok, lekker verwarrend... ik zal de vermelding van White er in ieder geval weer af halen.
user_12625593 (2021-11-03 08:17:00+00:00): Goed bezig trouwens :-)
user_12625593 (2021-11-03 09:25:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113322384
arvdk (2021-11-03 09:52:12+00:00): Bedankt, en bedankt :D zo houden we elkaar scherp ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-06 17:22:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393619789/history has vv=Roccheto key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Andrea Del Sarto (2024-03-06 23:07:35+00:00): HI,
it was a typo. I corrected it with the right tag.
thanks for the tip
Colin Smale (2021-10-24 19:18:09+00:00): Hi! I know you are new to OSM, but can you please try to get into the habit of leaving meaningful changeset comments? No need to state what you are editing (that is obvious) but some background as to why, plus your sources, would be a good start.
Thanks, and happy mapping!
Colin
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
eggie (2021-10-24 21:17:19+00:00): Dag Marein..

Tip..
Eigenlijk beter niet access=yes gebruiken icm met andere accesstags.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112918438

Dan die regel gewoon weghalen. 
vehicle=no is voldoende om alles met wielen te stoppen. 

MVG
eggie
Marein (2021-11-15 19:08:32+00:00): Dank je eggie, ik heb de tags nog eens verbeterd! Klopt het nu?
eggie (2021-11-15 19:11:20+00:00): Hoi..zal straks even kijken...
eggie (2021-11-15 19:29:09+00:00): Lijkt me wel oke...   mits je er natuurlijk mag lopen...  :)

MVG
eggie
archpdx (2021-10-24 20:25:04+00:00): Hi,
It looks like you created a duplicate gate in this changeset. I've removed this. Also, most keys, with the exception of the few (description, note, fixme) only allow certain values. "One way only-out of field" is not a valid value for the foot key, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot
Ars-UA (2021-10-24 20:12:24+00:00): Давно закрылся. Обещают в этом здании сделать технический музей.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-11 20:19:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996127533/history
Hoi A127,
De tag natural=Tuinen van Eden is volgens mij onjuist. De key natural=* beschrijft andere zaken.
Bedoelde je misschien name=Tuinen van Eden?
Groet,
Marc
A127 (2021-12-12 21:34:55+00:00): Dag Marc,
Bedankt voor je reactie.
Absoluut, dat moest inderdaad name=Tuinen van Eden zijn. Ik heb het bij deze gecorrigeerd.
eggie (2021-10-24 20:08:11+00:00): warnings:close_nodes:vertices 	37
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 	4
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	3
warnings:disconnected_way:highway

Look above KM,

Why so many edits in one changeset? 
Shifting the map in editmodus will harm the map.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112919393
	Hofplein 29  ?  Moved to an other location.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-10-24 20:14:19+00:00): You are deleting addressnodes from BAG import.
Addresses should not be deleted!
The buidlingshape is not the place for address-replacement
It's against the convention of mapping buildings in the Netherlands. 
Please reply,
eggie
eggie (2021-10-24 20:33:59+00:00): Addressnode Hofplein 29 restored.
Please use this node for additional info and keep the buildings clean.

Greetz,
eggie
km2bp (2021-10-24 21:21:32+00:00): Address 29 is the hotel, I merged it with the building and added the missing contact details and my own photos. I accept your attention and I will pay for the addresses. What wrong is not me. regards!
eggie (2021-10-24 21:58:38+00:00): Hi km,
It's the consensus using the addressnodes.
In other countries it's maybe different.
All addressnodes are the result of Kadaster import.
Gr eggie
km2bp (2021-10-24 22:05:51+00:00): 👍😊
JeroenHoek (2021-10-25 06:36:26+00:00): There is a lot of funny business going on in this changeset that feels wrong. If you must use image=*, at least upload your photos to a platform that allows for free licences like Wikimedia Commons, and obviously, release those images under a permissive licence. A bunch of links to copyrighted pictures on a Google service goes against the spirit of OpenStreetMap.

I'm also a bit confused by some of the nodes you moved (despite them being right where they should be), and the removal of a historic=memorial from a memorial bust.

I'm strongly considering reverting this changeset to prevent the damage from lingering.
eggie (2021-10-25 07:06:12+00:00): addr:city	Leeuwarden	
addr:housenumber	92	
addr:postcode	8911BN	
addr:street	Zaailand	
amenity	pub	
food	yes	
name	Het Wapen van Leeuwarden
Same problem...  Duplicated info at the addressnode  and building.
No addressnode anymore? 
I did'nt check all the buildings. 
eggie
eggie (2021-10-25 07:09:04+00:00): addr:city		Leeuwarden
addr:housenumber		7
addr:postcode		8911DE
addr:street		Noorderplantage
building	yes	yes
image		https://photos.app.goo.gl/Q2vMBHpsu8EHFUJb7
name		Pier Pandertempel
operator		Historisch Centrum Leeuwarden

No addressnode anymore..  Info only at buildingshape
eggie (2021-10-25 07:36:27+00:00): Hi km2bp,

Please restore the addressnodes and copy all the info to the nodes. 
Fletscher Hotel, Wapen van Leeuwarden and 	Pier Pandertempel .
Greetz,
eggie
E de Wit (2021-10-25 08:00:31+00:00): Whilst I do appreciatie mapping missing art and adding (I'm assuming your own) images, I'd suggest adding them to wikimedia like JeroenHoek suggested, this way the unknown license problem on openpoimap is sorted as well.

Apart from the aforementioned issues this changeset contain a lot of small things that pose a problem:

Only an image on a line made part of an MP:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996129669
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996129672
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8531434
Duplicated murals:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9198185221
Art called "Untitled":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8977923649
Images both on adressnode as wel as on the building itself:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3066728771
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3066729576
Image taken from the back of the Pier Pandertempel doesn't really reflect the real building, which is a shame because it can be easily photographed from the front:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302429218
Image on a split waterway part with questionable value:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431423147

I just skimmed through so there's probably more, so I can understand JeroenHoeks consideration of a revert, which would be a shame for all the good things being part of this changeset.

I hope you enjoy(ed) your stay here :)

-E de Wit
JeroenHoek (2021-10-25 10:29:06+00:00): I've fixed some of the issues not related to address nodes. The Neushoorn-complex might need a BAG-reimport; something is not quite right there.
E de Wit (2021-10-25 20:06:46+00:00): I went through the changeset and changed quite a bit:
Removed images with people unblurred
Removed images from residential buildings
Removed images that already have an image or wikidata added
Removed images from signs (information boards) and random lines
Removed duplicate murals
@JeroenHoek:
Reimported multiple BAG buildings and adresses, inluding The Neushoorn-complex

This may sound worse than it actually is, many images from art (like murals / statues) are all still there.
E de Wit (2021-10-27 18:15:22+00:00): Images of private homes, people unblurred, images of random signs and images representing photographed objects inaccurately have all been added again without further discussing it with the community:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113006116

Very strongly leaning to reverting this complete changeset.

-E de Wit
salvoconducto (2021-10-24 20:03:50+00:00): I would straighten the buildings before upload by pressing "Q".
eggie (2021-10-24 20:50:03+00:00): Please don't touch and harm routerelations by splitting ways.

I fixed the hikingroute..


You promised before...

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66623



NKA wrote:

    Please stop splitting highways and other OSM objects! You are making it incredibly difficult for other users to maintain the highways and other objects. You could add a separate unconnected node with the image instead.

    Or stop adding this crap to OSM altogether ...

 

I understood the suggestions. I did not know that dividing roads into sections is wrong. From now on, I will only add photos to monuments, graffiti sculptures and buildings.   Please do not withdraw my changes as it will take away my motivation to create OSM
km2bp (2021-10-24 21:13:13+00:00): I keep my promise and do not divide roads into sections. It only adds photos and objects based on the GPS track   Check edit history better
eggie (2021-10-24 21:32:45+00:00): Oke.. In this case the route was not connected anymore with the ref node.
You created a new construction here at the junction. 
I fixed it.. No problem.

Greetz,
eggie
km2bp (2021-10-24 22:03:28+00:00): 👍
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-11-17 08:19:19+00:00): dou conta de destruição de trabalho e rotas associadas na praça josé fontana, agradeço mais cuidado. cumprimentos
Reino Baptista (2021-11-17 10:14:13+00:00): Bom dia.
Lamento o sucedido. A minha intenção é sempre melhorar o mapa. Deverá ter sido um descuido pois a zona é muito complexa. 
Podes, p.f., dar algum detalhe daquilo a que te referes. 
Obrigado.
eggie (2021-10-24 21:20:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.
Ik heb de info overgezet. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-24 21:24:47+00:00): Dag nodiesel

De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode.
phone in osm format omgezet  met +31
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-24 21:26:17+00:00): Info verplaatst naar adresnode
gr eggie
APneunzehn74 (2022-06-06 19:18:22+00:00): Hallo, diese Wege mit dem Namen Verboten, die heißen doch nicht wirklich so. Denke der Name kann weg?
Gruß Andreas
czubi (2021-10-25 15:37:25+00:00): Glashütte steht auf disused, ist die Bar wieder in Betrieb?
Animyos Fox (2021-10-25 15:49:44+00:00): @czubi Gestern waren zumindest auf der oberen Terrasse Leute, ich war aber nicht drin.
user_14250389 (2021-10-29 08:46:20+00:00): 妹妹畫的真的很棒！這麼大的工作量，辛苦啦！可以不用這麼仔細的，只要勾出大致輪廓即可。
（畢竟水位還是有可能隨空照圖拍攝之日期而改變，描繪出的形狀也會變化。那顯然是沒有必要緊隨著去修正的。）
總之，感謝小妹你對北京地區開放街圖之圖資的貢獻！
ramthelinefeed (2021-11-14 20:40:15+00:00): Everything has an address, my friend ;) 

The addresses for all Lambeth's parks are given on the Lambeth Council website
confusedbuffalo (2021-11-15 20:58:53+00:00): Some people would think that as you can't send post to parks they aren't 'addressable', but whatever, feel free to amend.
ramthelinefeed (2021-11-15 22:48:46+00:00): Well yes, you can't post letters there. But all land is owned and has an address on the Land Registry (well, unless it's very special and secret ;)
seewäldler (2021-10-25 16:29:13+00:00): Hallo spaetzlesdrucker
Hier geht doch der Bäcker Weber (jetzt Markdorfer Straße 62) rein, so lange die dortige Filiale renoviert wird?
spaetzlesdrucker (2021-10-25 17:53:31+00:00): Davon hatte ich auch gehört, kenne aber keinen Zeitpunkt, wann der Umzug stattfinden soll. Auf jeden Fall ist der Weber jetzt noch am alten Ort und Café Stock ist definitiv Geschichte.
maraf24 (2021-10-27 21:35:56+00:00): Opisz co poprawiasz, a nie "small fix". To nic nie znaczy.
Arcijz (2021-10-30 12:06:52+00:00): Nepiekrītu veiktajām izmaiņām - reiss 3050 iet pa Torņa un Kanaviņu ielām, lai nogādātu skolēnus Alūksnes novada vidusskolā un atsevišķi reisi iegriežas arī Sīļu dārzkopības kooperatīvā, reisi uz Kapsētu parasti arī uzbrauc līdz Kapsētas pieturai pie Alūksnes Lielajiem kapiem. Kā arī 3051. reiss aizbrauc līdz Tālavas ielas galam ar krustojumu uz Pullāna dārziņiem, kur ir piemērota vieta, lai autobuss apgrieztos braukšanai atpakaļ. Šie autobusu maršruti ir kartēti pārvadātāja mājaslapā https://www.marsruti.lv/LSA/#aluksne/
Maris33 (2021-10-31 10:40:44+00:00): Labdien!
Maršruti tika veidoti balstoties uz Autotransporta direkcijas un mājaslapā 1188.lv esošajiem datiem. Maršruts uz Sīļiem iespējams ir sezonāls, tāpēc nav pieejams un šobrīd nekursē. Veikšu labojumus
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
archie (2022-08-20 07:50:19+00:00): Hej, Du bytte uppgifterna här (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3186279162/history) till Handelsbanken. Det var inte bra. Affärsbankerna i Sverige äger tillsammans bolaget Bankomat AB, vilket bolag ÄGER och driver uttagsautomaterna.
archie (2022-08-20 08:10:26+00:00): Du har dessvärre gjort det på andra uttagsautomater också (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112922108). Du har tom satt namn på den. Ett tips från en insider: Uttagsautomater har inget namn. Även den här ägs och drivs av Bankomat AB. Förresten skulle jag avråda från att helt lita på wikipedias uppgifter ang bankomater.
magol (2022-08-20 09:37:30+00:00): Jag minns inte denna ändring, och förstår inte hur jag tänkte. Uppenbarligen blev det fel. Pinsamt.
archie (2022-08-20 10:07:28+00:00): Nej, då. Ingen fara. Det står ju bankens namn som marknadsföring på den. Man kan nog inte förutsätta att allmänheten känner till interna ägarförhållanden m m. Jag meddelade dig bara så du vet varför det bör ändras. Det var ingen förebråelse.
DaveF (2022-07-24 00:07:34+00:00): Are you sure about this hole?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996151051

There appears to be a tee/worn grass/fairway for it to the South East.
watmildon (2023-03-09 05:05:10+00:00): Stumbled across this changeset doing a quick edit in the area. Looks great! Good work.
BubbaJuice (2023-03-09 05:16:04+00:00): Thank you.
VictorIE (2022-05-07 19:43:30+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9198375485

You seem to have mapped this as a glacier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=glacier?uselang=en-GB
Magoo (2022-05-07 21:44:39+00:00): thanks, changed it to Moraine, does it need anything else?
mueschel (2021-10-26 13:55:46+00:00): Hi,
is "communication:2" a mistake or intentional?
DUGA (2021-10-27 12:47:31+00:00): Thanks for checking it. To be honest I have no idea why this happened because 2 is not a valid option for communication type. I’m not even sure how this was added in iD.

I’ve removed it.
ToniE (2021-10-25 07:54:31+00:00): Hi diskostu,

sidewalk=separate bedeutet, dass sie in OSM als separate Ways gemapped sind, was hier nicht der Fall ist.

Hier wäre sidewalk=both korrekt.

Gruß
Toni
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
SomeoneElse (2021-10-25 15:52:19+00:00): Hello,
I think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380542099 might have got extended here which added a spur to the IOW coastal path.
I've snipped it off in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112953889 .
Best Regards,
Andy
CjMalone (2021-10-25 21:19:15+00:00): Nice one, I extended the sidewalk to a more accurate point, I guess that's what caused this. Kinda surprised JOSM didn't warn me about it.
mini-me (2021-10-25 08:17:45+00:00): Не надо менять maxspeed=RU:urban на 60 если нет знака
Patchanka (2021-10-25 15:39:24+00:00): bonjour
je vois que vous avez ajouté un nid de cigogne. J'en ai moi-même ajouté quelques uns ces derniers temps dans les Landes mais s'agissant de poteaux placés volontairement par l'homme, j'avais utilisé man_made=nesting_site qui désigne un support "non naturel".
Wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dnesting_site
La requête Overpass : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cmZ

Concernant le nid que vous avez ajouté, est-il sur un lieu "naturel" (comme un arbre, etc) ? 

Patchanka, 
amatrice de nids d'oiseaux
Bobos-Seven (2021-10-25 15:48:50+00:00): Bonjour Patchanka,

Concernant les nids des Barthes, ce sont bien tous des arbres (chênes) naturels qui ont été préservés car porteurs d'un nid.
je vous remercie pour votre vigilance
eggie (2021-10-25 06:00:42+00:00): De dubbele vermelding heb ik weer verwijderd.
Kijk even op een reguliere computer voor het effect.
Paar keer ctrl-f5
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-25 05:56:40+00:00): Dag nodiesel,

De huisartspraktijk was hier al toegevoegd.
De dubbele vermelding heb ik verwijderd.
Een paar keer CTRL-F5 maakt de cache van je browser leeg. Dan zie je pas wat je hebt toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-25 05:58:08+00:00): Beste nodiesel,
De huisartspraktijk staat nu 2x vermeld.
Ik zal je toevoeging verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-25 20:41:11+00:00): Hi km,

Why duplicated tagging at building and addressnode?
addr:city	Groningen	
addr:housenumber	110	
addr:street	Herman Colleniusstraat	

image		https://photos.app.goo.gl/F6yT4qJHHh7MvP81A
source	BAG	BAG

Please have a look again.
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112923497
Greetz,
eggie
km2bp (2021-10-26 17:37:34+00:00): The reason is very simple.
People are looking for addresses, not building outlines
I place photos so that I want to give others something like Street View.
I have 2 examples for you. 

1) Only address 380  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3114454459
2) Building connected to an address in a country where it is allowed   https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372874709   

In the Netherlands, I am only a guest and that's why I ask you to check my editions so as not to violate the local rules of creating maps
Regards Km2bp
BAGgeraar (2021-11-08 14:44:58+00:00): Ha jonrellim, over tijdelijke afsluitingen is al veel discussie geweest. Wellicht het beste om dit voortaan met access:conditional = no@<datum> in te voeren in plaats van access=no.
Zie bijvoorbeeld https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63629 en https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63254
eggie (2021-11-08 15:54:54+00:00): Ik zal hier even access=no verwijderen anders hebben we een gemankeerde kaart en 10 nov is ook al bijna.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-08 15:58:43+00:00): access=no verwijderd. Het zal voor twee dagen geen zin hebben om nog conditionaltagging toe te voegen.
access=no is eigenlijk bijna altijd 'fout'. 
gr eggie
jonrellim (2021-11-09 08:28:49+00:00): Aha oke, ik deed acces=no om zeker te zijn dat route planning deze weg overslaat. Als je namelijk de weg op construction zet gaat hij ook automatisch naar acces=no. Na 10 november gaat de andere kant ook nog op de schop.
eggie (2021-11-09 09:16:53+00:00): Oke Jan, maar highway=construction is dus ook niet correct behalve als de weg voor vele maanden dicht gaat en/of de situatie anders terugkomt. 

Voor een week zou ik gewon de boel zo laten.. een periode van weken kan dan met conditionaltagging..
Zomaar een voorbeeld:
access:conditional=no @ (2021 Jan 20-2021 Apr 3)
MVG en bedankt voor je reactie
eggie
jonrellim (2021-11-09 14:43:19+00:00): Ik snap het. Reden waarom ik het wel doe, ook voor werkzaamheden van een maar weken, is omdat koeriersbedrijven vaak OSM data wel elke dag actualiseren om route planning uit te voeren. Zo kan de automatische planning er mee rekening houden dat een weg dicht is. Ik weet alleen niet zeker welke tags ze interpreteren en welke niet. In ieder geval bedankt voor je hulp!
eggie (2021-11-09 15:36:05+00:00): Advies.. echt niet doen. De verschillende routingapps kunnen als de de osm tagging ondersteunen rekening houden met conditional tagging. 
De routers zullen zich moeten aanpassen naar de consensus binnen osm.
Het voorkomt ook dat wegen soms nog maanden op slot staan en gebruikers die jaarlijks een kaart downloaden voor gps zitten dan niet met een mankeerde kaart.
Gr eggie
user_5589 (2021-10-27 08:53:27+00:00): I warned you about doing this again. You did it again.

Data Working Group it is.
DaveF (2021-10-27 10:28:04+00:00): data, “ат”openstreetmap“ԁοт”org

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
SomeoneElse (2021-10-30 10:08:05+00:00): Hello DaveF,
You've changed natural=sand to surface=sand on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996018658/history here.  In https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course it actually says "Recommended to also tag with surface=sand or natural=sand", so I don't understand on what basis you are making the "sand" changes here?
As you've suggested at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112997540 a more general discussion of this tagging makes sense; perhaps talk-gb would be a good place to start since these changes of yours have been restricted to GB.
Best Regards,
Andy