piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-09-19 19:58:59+00:00): Nou.. ook een typo  :) Reddingbrigade>Reddingsbrigade
user_4493657 (2022-09-21 17:46:58+00:00): Hi. Are you sure that an underground pedestrian crossing has been built in this place?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096085767
Yog Sot (2022-10-14 10:16:12+00:00): Not 100% sure, but very likely not a built crossing, just a way to pass along the stream. 
This is based on strava heatmap
I will be making a local vission at some point
Aim311_ (2023-11-02 17:48:46+00:00): Tunel i ścieżkę usunąłem z powodu niezastania takiego połączenia w terenie.
Yog Sot (2023-11-03 01:33:04+00:00): a strumień płynie przepustem/tunelem czy linia kolejowa jednak tworzy most?
Nie było okazji sprawdzić
Aim311_ (2023-11-06 10:56:41+00:00): W przepuście jest woda i 0,5 m prześwitu. https://postimg.cc/gallery/9wYTSts
Aim311_ (2023-11-06 10:59:52+00:00): Może dane GPS zostały zebrane kilka, kilkadziesiąt lat temu, przed modernizacją linii kolejowej?
Yog Sot (2023-11-09 20:19:21+00:00): aha, czyli to typowy przepust, bo czasami przepływ wody łączony jest z przejściem dla zwierzat i wtedy człowiek tez może przejść. 
Była przebudowa linii tak jak mówisz.
Patchanka (2022-09-21 12:29:44+00:00): bonjour
j'ai remis le bâtiment car vous l'aviez supprimé en même temps que le resto. On est d'accord que le bâtiment est toujours là ?
coucor64 (2022-09-26 14:07:48+00:00): bonjour,
désolé pour cette bourde, effectivement, le bâtiment est toujours là.
user_5359 (2022-09-22 19:22:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1096089715. what is the meaning of the tags
FAA:LFSN = 50870.69*A
aa = AK16
?
Necessarycoot72 (2022-09-24 08:51:25+00:00): Oops aa is supposed to be faa. FAA:LFSN is The FAA's Landing Facility Site Number. it's mostly used in the FAA facility database. You can read it about it on the wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Daerodrome
Necessarycoot72 (2022-09-24 08:53:50+00:00): Plus, FAA:LFSN acts like a unique identifier for all airports and helipads in the US. even ones that dont have a faa designation
gscholz (2022-09-20 06:32:45+00:00): Hi filippo1974,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=13.54190&lat=41.28343&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126393536

Can you please fix this?

You may educate yourself about how to edit hiking routes properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-09-28 08:08:29+00:00): Hi filippo1974, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
ivanbranco (2022-12-07 12:31:57+00:00): Hi Brendan,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078178317/history

shouldn't it be "marked" if it's a zebra?
danieldegroot2 (2025-10-30 10:43:41+00:00): This has since been resolved. It is clearly unmarked (also based on Mapillary), so zebra tag was removed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134944551
SomeoneElse (2023-05-14 22:32:57+00:00): Alas, the "East Riding" added as a subarea to the traditional county of Yorkshire here is the wrong one, it's the modern unitary authority https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/88083 , noth the old Riding which https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56150279 would be on the boundary of.
ptarac (2022-09-24 17:34:52+00:00): Proszę uzupełnić, ewentualnie podać w komentarzu, informacje o dokładnej lokalizacji np: piętro, przy wejściu, korytarz, przy pokoju nr. Dziekuję :)
mcoval (2022-09-24 19:54:34+00:00): Parter - wewnątrz budynku, obok wejścia.
ptarac (2022-09-25 13:57:29+00:00): Dziękuję za informacje. Uzupełniłem.
rarad74 (2022-09-20 07:07:22+00:00): Salut. Incearca Everydoor. Este peste vespucci atata ca usurinta in folosire, cat si ca interfata.
szjozsef (2022-09-20 07:14:13+00:00): o sa incerc, dar nu am avut ptobleme cu Vespucci, chiar imi place :)
szjozsef (2022-09-20 07:19:07+00:00): mda, e mai grafic, dar aparent mai prostut..
la anumite obiecte nu stie de valirile implicite si vrea sa adaug o cheie oarecare, care doar umfla harta cu date priprietati adaugate in plus (care in mod normal au valori implicite)
rarad74 (2022-09-20 07:29:44+00:00): Ai mult mai multe posibilitati de a edita proprietatile cladirilor si a poi-urilor. Iti sugereaza toate tagurile posibile. Sunt adaugate inclusiv toate metodele de plata existente acolo unde doresti sa adaugi anumite carduri de plata acceptate. Si Adresele pe cladiri se pot adauga destul de usor.
dam74 (2025-05-04 07:34:24+00:00): bonjour,
pourquoi avez-vous changer le nom du fournil par "Molière" ? car le propriétaire ne semble pas de cet avis
merci
jlgnt (2025-05-04 07:50:48+00:00): Bonjour,
Oups ! Erreur en effet, j'ai corrigé !
jlgnt (2025-05-04 07:51:01+00:00): Merci
MxxCon (2022-09-21 06:44:18+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you mapping here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126394398
DeSchu (2022-09-21 07:11:53+00:00): Hi, as written in the name.
It is called a skybridge. A bridge between two buildings. Very famous for tourists and a nice photostop. It is in the staple street. 
Do you suggest another tag instead of viewpoint?
Frans S (2022-09-21 10:53:44+00:00): Hello. See my comment on another changeset .
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126394538
Frans S (2022-09-21 14:37:04+00:00): Hello. I reviewed a number of your changesets and in general you left some issues. Per changeset I commented them to you.
Best regards
Another point. Please collect mappings' till you want to stop or have been finished on a task before uploading them
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126394617
maraf24 (2022-09-19 21:18:42+00:00): Nie wygląda to na centrum przetwarzania, ale właśnie na biurowiec.
Poza tym nie zauważyłeś, że robiąc tę zmianę zniknął tag budynku. To jest akurat pułapka, którą edytor iD zastawia na początkujących - trzeba tam ręcznie kliknąć i przywrócić budynek po zmienieniu rodzaju POI. 
Właściwy tag tutaj to office=company.
eggie (2022-09-20 07:34:53+00:00): Beste Mark.. Op een fietspad hoort geen bicycle en foot=designated..
en we zetten op reguliere wegen en paden geen oneway=no
Alleen soms bij parallelfietspaden om =yes mappen te voorkomen.

Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-20 07:41:14+00:00): designated van voorgaande mapper verwijderd.
Wellicht wel eens nuttig om uit te zoeken welke klasse fietspaden hier lopen. NL:G12a?
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
Syl (2022-09-20 10:23:56+00:00): Bonjour, on voit sur l'image aérienne qu'il y a un chemin piéton sur le parking. Il a été supprimé depuis ?
Syl (2022-12-09 15:32:34+00:00): Bonjour, après vérification sur place j'ai annulé votre modification et remis le chemin.
Frans S (2022-09-21 10:21:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Do not add name tags to buildings like rural building. 

* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395290
Frans S (2022-09-21 10:23:09+00:00): Hi. Another issue.
* Overlapping buildings drawn.
You draw buildings over each other. Don't !
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395290
AntMadeira (2022-09-21 10:21:50+00:00): Olá, _Noahhhh_.
Sê bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap.

Vi que adicionaste nomes nos nós de saída da A 13, porém, os nós não têm nomes. Quando muito, pode (e deve-se) adicionar os destinos nas saídas (ligações). Este é um erro comum cometido um pouco por todo o lado, mas assim ficas já a saber e evita-se este tipo de erros no futuro. Irei reverter a ta edição, mas que isso não te impeça de participar na edição do maior mapa livre do mundo!
Qualquer dúvida, estou a dispor, seja por mensagem ou no canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa de OSM:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
eggie (2022-09-20 07:51:27+00:00): Als voorbeeld een aanvraag ingediend voor BAG import van scholencomplex. We tekenen gebouwen niet zelf in. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=872256#p872256
Een school wordt getagd met amenity=school op de adresnode.
Het schoolterrein als landuse=education. Dit is momenteel een item op het forum. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-20 07:52:23+00:00): Maar overigens netjes ingetekend.
MarkJeronimus (2022-09-20 17:29:22+00:00): Wat is het punt van de tutorial die ik moest volgen na aanmelden (wat alleen maar gaat over toevoegen van dingen) als bijna alle data van automatische bronnen komt en er alleen nog maar bijgeschaaft hoeft te worden? Ik heb nog nooit van BAG gefoord en was door niks (behanve jou) naar de forums en zelfs maar de wiki verwezen .
MarkJeronimus (2022-09-20 17:31:38+00:00): Toen ik begon te mappen had ik zo veel lol dat het me niet lukte om te stoppen. Daarom was mijn eerste changeset zo groot. Met zoveel regels en bronnen om mee rekening te houden, die alleen een veteraan mapper allemaal uit zijn hoofd kent, is alle lol er af.
eggie (2022-09-20 18:29:11+00:00): Hoi.. gewoon doormappen Fouten maken is niet erg.
Er zijn nu eenmaal regels nodig vastgelegd in de wiki .. anders blijft er niets van de kaart over.
Elke veteraan begon ooit als starter. We proberen nieuwe mappers alleen maar te helpen. Alles achter iemands rug herstellen helpt ook niet.
Dus probeer plezier in mappen te houden. Vraag aan medemapper of je het goed doet. Straks kun je zelf starters helpen.
De BAG is de database van adressen en gebouwen van o.a. het Kadaster.
Gebouwen en adressen worden geïmporteerd.
Ooit was er ook een import van de landuse. De 3dshapes. Die is achterhaald.in 2007 was er een import van de basis van het wegennet via een donatie van AND.
Please don't shoot the validator.
Groet
Eggie
MarkJeronimus (2022-09-20 19:00:10+00:00): Verbeter graag acter mijn rug om (zoals de school). Ik leer beter van voorbeeld dan van teksten. Ik ben erg slecht/traag in lezen.
elkueb (2023-01-12 08:32:44+00:00): Hi,

it seems to work rather badly ;)

According to: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway

"Hint: if the waterway starts as a stream and becomes larger, then use the tag of the largest waterway (e.g. river). This is purely informational, the stream members still need their own waterway=* tag. " :(
IknowJoseph (2023-01-17 19:23:28+00:00): Think I've resolved that now. Thanks for the help.
Noen (2022-09-21 19:49:16+00:00): Hei og velkommen til Openstreetmap!
«abandoned» er ikke et helt beskrivende engelsk ord her, det flere steder ingen spor igjen etter det historiske sidesporet til Mesna.
Er du interessert i å legge til historiske jernbaner, og det er det flere som er, anbefaler jeg varmt å lage en konto hos søsterprosjektet Openhistoricalmap (https://openhistoricalmap.org), hvor du kan bruke samme redigeringsverktøy som i Openstreetmap.
Natfoot (2026-03-07 08:04:09+00:00): these lines are better suited for Open Historical Map. If the line or right of way is obliterated by buildings or roads it has no reason being on Open Street Map.  if the right of way or line can be seen in the ground that is exceptionable by me but by many other mappers that is still historical.
Frans S (2022-09-21 14:44:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).

Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395471
Frans S (2022-09-21 14:51:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395471
Dimitar155 (2024-09-07 20:41:21+00:00): Здравей Пламен,

Това май не е точно претоварна станция (като https://www.osm.org/way/1314044631). Предполагам че тук се събират кашони за рециклиране?

Поздрави,
Митко
plamen (2024-09-10 10:41:20+00:00): Събираха някакви боклуци, но не си спомням вече. Ако имам път натам, ще погледна.
plamen (2025-02-09 07:39:54+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=986615793375087
Dimitar155 (2025-02-11 10:57:47+00:00): Мерси!
Frans S (2022-09-21 10:14:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key .
I reviewed the majority of your mappings and the all show the same issues I reported to you on other changesets.
Please be more accurate in your mappings.






Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395562
Frans S (2022-09-21 14:31:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395642
Frans S (2022-09-21 10:58:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, do not connect nodes of buildings to a road or other features.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395681
Frans S (2022-09-21 15:00:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You hardly squared a building. Please do not map other objects like the ones you mapped as courtyard.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395828
Frans S (2022-09-21 14:56:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395861
Frans S (2022-09-21 14:56:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395912
Frans S (2022-09-21 10:41:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points which are valid on all your mappings.
Your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395928
Frans S (2022-09-21 14:28:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub. Here you mapped a piece of land as a building



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395937
Frans S (2022-09-21 14:54:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126395973
spelledwrongdotuk (2022-09-20 09:23:52+00:00): What imagery did you us? The bing street view here is 7 years out of date and I can't find a mapillary image with a good enough view to confirm this doesn't exist.
PhysicsArmature (2022-09-20 09:35:51+00:00): My apologies, I will conduct a ground survey and report back before 5:30AM Central Time
PhysicsArmature (2022-09-20 10:46:03+00:00): @spelledwrongdotuk
I have toured the site. I can confirm that no SOS phone was present. I could not record as night time imagery is not allowed or if it is, is not useful.
PT-53 (2022-09-21 06:59:52+00:00): Hallo Hunsbuckel,
Du hast diesen aufgegebenen (?) Weg 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096127707/history
neu eingezeichnet. 
Für diesen wird im OSM-Inspector ein Fehlerhinweis "Hidden non-operational tagging" angezeigt:
- https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.77967&lat=47.60127&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes%2Cnonop_confusion_on_ways

Ursache ist das falsche / veraltete Merkmal
- disused=yes
Richtig wäre dieses zu löschen und das Merkmal
- highway=track
abzuändern auf
disused:highway=track
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Hunsbuckel (2022-09-21 11:29:49+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe das jetzt mal entsprechend geändert und werde beobachten, wie sich die Routing-Software und Kartendarstellung von Komoot und OutdoorActive dort verhält.
Leider habe ich die Erfahrung gemacht, dass dann sichtbare Abzweige nicht als solche gewertet werden und man somit fehlgeleitet wird.
Der Weg ist ja sichtbar, nur stark zugewachsen und führt nirgends mehr hin, wenn man nicht über Felsen im Bachbett klettern will. Habe ich gemacht, ist aber nicht zu empfehlen... ;o)
Hunsbuckel (2022-09-22 19:31:11+00:00): Kommando zurück, denn mit disused:highway=track wird eine Linie erstellt und gar nichts in der Karte gezeigt!