piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
ovruni (2022-10-11 14:40:58+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios al igual que en otros se han agregado varios edificios no existentes, por lo que he revertido los conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
KhoraKavat (2022-10-11 07:25:01+00:00): Редактирование города Спасска-Дальнего
ovruni (2022-10-11 14:39:53+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado un objeto que tampoco es visible desde las imágenes aéreas, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
DaveF (2022-10-12 12:55:05+00:00): There is already a railway station:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12710092
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-11 07:33:47+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=29.772152%2C-81.925427%2C16.70
Pedja (2023-02-27 11:57:36+00:00): Ako menjaš nazive ulice moraš obavezno da proveriš i uskladiš tag ref:RS:ulica

Ovde si ostavila staru vrednost taga koji pripada drugoj ulici.

Da li si negde proverila nazive ulcia pre izmene jer u zvaničnom RGZ registru ulica ne stoji ovako kako si ti upisala?

#needconfirmation
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Jillis inactivE (2022-10-16 17:12:54+00:00): Svp even kijken naar https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3401272, volgens mij zijn de fietspaden aldaar niet vrijliggend, zoals ze nu ingetekend zijn.
Geim (2022-10-16 17:15:06+00:00): Hoi,
Je hebt hier een vrijliggend fietspad getekend: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102800146#map=18/51.95655/5.57690
Zou je eens naar deze opmerking willen kijken? En als het daadwerkelijk een vrijliggend fietspad is, verwijder dan ook even de cycleway=lane van de weg er naast (en plaats de nodige use_sidepaths)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
ivanbranco (2022-10-11 09:57:36+00:00): Come già spiegato in questi changeset:
1. changeset/125725641
2. changeset/126223614
3. changeset/126837986 
4. changeset/126882774

devi smetterla di aggiungere edifici come nodi. In un changeset successivo a questo ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127342915 ) hai pure mosso i nodi: potevi eliminare il tag building in quel frangente, ma non lo hai fatto comunque. Qui trovi una query Overpass se vuoi sistemarli: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mEp

Per favore leggi qua: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments
"Update" non è un buon commento al changeset, non aiuta gli altri utenti a capire cosa hai modificato. Puoi utilizzare commenti come "spostato albero", "aggiunto negozio", "sistemata strada" per far comprendere agli altri utenti cosa hai modificato.

Come già spiegato qua:
1. changeset/125536413
2. changeset/126997695
3. changeset/127233296
il campo "name" va utilizzato solo per i nomi propri. "Area parcheggio" è un nome descrittivo e non va bene: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10090297124
Inoltre i valori dei tag sono per convenzione in minuscolo, quindi "fee=no" e non "fee=No".

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10088758525
La regola in Italia è di mappare i numeri civici senza separatore e con l'esponente minuscolo, quindi "addr:housenumber=17b" e non "addr:housenumber=17 / B", "5bis" e non "5 Bis" ecc.
PasqualeD (2022-10-11 11:30:49+00:00): Ciao!! Lo sai che hai ragione ti ringrazio per i tuoi preziosi consigli, dato che le mappe sono aperte puoi aggiustare tu se vuoi, io cerco di fare del mio meglio, un saluto, P.
Cascafico (2022-10-11 20:54:50+00:00): Ciao Pasquale,
ho dato un'occhiata anch'io ai tuoi edit, ma mi pare che everydoor non sia adatto per questo tipo di survey. Avrebbe senso mappare edifici come nodi  se ti trovassi in una zona non mappata, non ci fossero immagini aeree e fossi di fretta. Ma non è così. In questo modo generi duplicati di edifici e raddoppi il lavoro, nel senso che costringi altri mappatori a riprendere in mano gli oggetti, spostare i tag dei building, indovinare i tipi di negozi ed uffici.

Inoltre ho notato molte inconguenze: un negozio al pian terreno di un condominio non è un building e metterci il building:level=1 non significa definire il piano a cui sta il negozio.

Matera è una città che si merita di essere mappata bene: i tuoi sopralluoghi sono importanti: falli con criterio. Ti consiglio di mappare solo gli indirizzi, perchè hanno un valore notevole.
PasqualeD (2022-10-11 21:55:53+00:00): Grazie mille per i preziosi consigli!
ovruni (2022-10-11 14:26:31+00:00): Hola, aquí se ha agregado un edificio ficticio, por lo que lo he retirado.
Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
pio2_122 (2022-10-11 10:34:05+00:00): Please map the landuse separately from the roads, as this makes it difficult to edit the geometry of these objects.
Note that other landuses in the area are not connected to roads. Thank you in advance.
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-10-14 17:47:12+00:00): Большое спасибо за то, что пишете понятные комментарии к своим изменениям!
Seva-snz (2022-10-18 18:03:54+00:00): Стараюсь) вот довелось снова побывать в Башкирии, решил немного улучшить карту, чем смог
DeFra85 (2022-12-07 09:44:55+00:00): Hej hej, wie wäre es wenn wir ref:name_signposted= hier auch einfach in name= ändern, wie bei den etlichen anderen Wegweisern auch. Edman92 ging es ja glaube ich nur darum das keine "Adressen" oder so im ref= sind
Muhmaker (2022-12-07 11:47:47+00:00): Hi. Ursprünglich wollte ich mal davon weg, "name" für die Wegweiser zu setzten weil ich das unpassend finde. Aber ich akzeptiere inzwischen, dass es hier überwiegend so gehandhabt wird. Konkret hier bei den Wegweisern mit Namen "Rosenhöhe" und "Senne, Waterboerstraße" wollte ich vermeiden, dass in einer Suche nach diesen Begriffen zu viele irreführende Treffer auftauchen. Ich war irrtümlich davon ausgegangen, dass Rosenhöhe ein Berggipfel ist. Die Suche danach liefert alles mögliche. Also zählt mein Argument dort auch nicht mehr wirklich. Bei der Suche nach der Straße wäre es natürlich schön, ein eindeutiges Ergebnis zu haben. Aber wenn du name unbedingt einheitlich haben willst mach ruhig. Ich mag mich mit diesem Thema eigentlich nicht weiter auseinandersetzen
DeFra85 (2022-12-08 20:50:50+00:00): Ansonsten ist mit schon ref_name= über den Weg gelaufen. Aber das scheint auch irgendwie nicht passend zu sein, oder? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ref_name
Muhmaker (2022-12-09 07:58:51+00:00): Ja finde ich auch unpassend hier. Das kenne ich eher von Bushaltestellen. Damit kann der Unterschied in den Namen vor Ort und den "offiziellen" Namen in den elektronischen Fahrplaninformationssystemen dargestellt werden. Ist aber auch dort alles andere als vollständig und systematisch erfasst nach meinem Eindruck. Wie gesagt ist mein Interesse an den Namen hier nur sehr gering. Mach wie du magst
DeFra85 (2022-12-10 23:18:20+00:00): Danke dir auf jeden Fall, dass du unterwegs warst und die Infos gesammelt hast
Frans S (2022-10-14 10:51:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127342919
AnuradhaRajanayake (2022-10-14 14:45:22+00:00): Hi Frans S, Thank you for your comment and the shared materials.  I apologize for my mistakes. I'm trying to re-correct it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127342919
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
user_5359 (2022-10-11 08:34:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.
joost schouppe (2022-10-17 12:28:23+00:00): Wat bedoel je precies met "voor één keer op de lijn"? De AED hangt aan de muur, dan plak je die toch altijd vast aan de lijn?
philippec (2022-10-17 13:45:43+00:00): Ik weet dat dat de algemene opvatting is, maar voor mij is dat onhandig.  Ik heb er al veel over geschreven.
Hier hangt ze binnen de omtrek van de kolommen.
philippec (2022-10-17 13:51:51+00:00): Strictu sensu zou ze hier zelfs aan de binnenkant van de lijn hangen.
bxl-forever (2022-10-11 22:57:26+00:00): Hello,

Good first edit, thanks!
MxxCon (2022-10-12 05:36:13+00:00): Hello.
Shouldn't this be alt_name:etymology:wikidata tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127343949
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:03:53+00:00): That is maybe a batter way of tagging
Snusmumriken (2022-10-11 11:11:04+00:00): Hej

Jag tror att building=transportation vore mera passande. Rådhuset är ju ingen tågstation utan en tunnelbanestation
ghost_07 (2022-10-11 12:00:39+00:00): Sure will fix
nyampire (2022-10-13 03:33:09+00:00): OSMへようこし！
編集をレビューしました。よく描けていると思います。
ぜひこの調子で、いろいろなものをマッピングしてみてください。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127344264
Rico557 (2022-10-12 07:16:11+00:00): Короткий номер уже не действует?
BCNorwich (2022-10-11 13:43:45+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if these roads are really two thousand five hundred metres wide? The Maxwidth is in metres so if it's two and a half metres wide it's tagged as 2.5 (two point five metres). Could you check them please?

Regards Bernard.
DLP Planning (2022-10-11 13:46:29+00:00): Hi Bernard, 
I didn't mean to do this, was tryingto find a way to add a weight limit on the roads so was testing out methods. Any idea on how i do this??
BCNorwich (2022-10-11 16:05:33+00:00): Hi, The tag for weight limit is maxweight=??? It's not included in the drop-down menu of the iD editor, you have to type it in.  

It looks like all these roads had the width tag added, it would be best to revert the changeset. Would you like me to do the revert for you?

Regards Bernard.
DLP Planning (2022-10-11 16:10:32+00:00): Hi Bernard, yes please as didnt mean to do it. Thanks
BCNorwich (2022-10-11 16:30:50+00:00): OK the changeset is reverted back as it was. 
Glad to help, Regards Bernard.
mueschel (2022-10-22 11:07:40+00:00): Reminder: Please improve your QA. I'm fixing misspelled tags by Grab employees on a almost daily basis.
joshjryan (2022-10-12 18:15:03+00:00): @kolasau I had intentionally removed that section of road (changeset 124945536). It has been dug up and permanently removed as part of the project widening I-25.
https://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2020/07/01/interstate-25-frontage-road-fort-collins-close-permanently/5352334002/

You are the third person "fix" the change that I made, based on old imagery.  Do you have any advice on how I can make sure this change does not continue to get undone?
kolasau (2022-10-17 07:47:05+00:00): Hello, joshjryan, thank you for the information, here is reverted changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127654422 Maybe check this to solve the problem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127344720
nyampire (2022-10-13 03:32:10+00:00): OSMへようこそ！ 編集をレビューしました。
とてもよく描けていると思います。ぜひこの調子で、いろいろなものを編集してみてください。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127344923
ovruni (2022-10-11 14:25:11+00:00): Hola, el uso de nombre esta destinado unicamente a objetos con un nombre en particular, no para descripciones. [0] Por otra parte se ha retirado la etiqueta de edificio sin motivo aparente, por lo que he restaurado el objeto.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
redd (2025-11-30 23:16:09+00:00): Hi MegaStar112,
beim Schützenhaus ist leider das building=yes verlorgen gegangen. Das habe ich nun wieder ergänzt.

Grüße

redd
Noen (2022-10-11 14:14:53+00:00): Hei!
Sykkelfeltet i Kristoffer Aamots manglet ikke. Men det er tagget med «cycleway:both=lane» istedenfor kun «cycleway=lane», som redigeringsverktøyet iD ignorerer.
Se https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9212
crumou (2022-10-12 10:29:49+00:00): İlgili bilgilendirme için teşekkür ederim hocam. Okul arazisinin tamamı Mehmet Sinan Dereli Ortaokulu Olarak mı geçiyor yoksa Türkan Dereli İlkokulu ile ortak mı kullanılıyor?
Frans S (2022-10-17 11:43:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127347582
V-Li (2022-10-11 14:11:54+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe nicht alle Stops geprüft, aber bitte grundsätzlich nicht für das Rendering mappen (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer).  Falls die ganzen Bussteige wirklich ordentliche Wartebereiche sind (wie am ROB in Aschaffenburg), dann ist es ok.
mapper65363 (2022-10-12 11:05:22+00:00): Danke für die Anmerkung. Das man nicht für das Rendering mappt, war mir bekannt. Den Änderungssatz habe ich aber gemacht, da highway=bus_stop laut Wiki auf den Bussteig gesetzt werden soll und dies nicht der Fall war. Da aber keine Bushaltestellensymbole auf der Karte sichtbar sind, wenn der Bussteig als Linie eingezeichnet wird, habe ich diese auf Flächen geändert, da es sehr sinnvoll ist, wenn die Haltestellen eingezeichnet sind. Alle geänderten Haltestellen haben dabei Bussteige, die klar als solche erkennbar sind (Buskap, Unterstand, etc.) und daher als Fläche eingezeichnet werden können.
V-Li (2022-10-12 11:27:48+00:00): Ok, dann bin ich zufrieden. Vielen Dank für die viele Arbeit im Aschaffenburger Raum.
V-Li (2022-10-17 07:23:35+00:00): Und jetzt muss ich doch noch einmal hierauf zurückkommen.  Osmose wirft für deine Änderungen viele Warnungen (z.B. osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=xxxx&level=1%2C2&tags=&fixable=&bbox=8.9325714%2C49.8814732%2C9.205513%2C50.0694808&zoom=16&lat=49.9758036&lon=9.1627619&level=2&tags=&fixable=&issue_uuid=32cfb0d9-1904-139a-358d-456900a7247d) und ich habe mich noch einmal eingelesen.  bus_stop sollte keine Fläche sein, Wartebereiche können mit platform ausgewiesen werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop#Bushaltestelle_(Bus_stop)
mapper65363 (2022-10-18 07:44:15+00:00): Wird korrigiert.
spod (2022-10-11 20:50:55+00:00): Why have you removed the addr:country=GB tag? Is there a purpose to it?
Paul Berry (2022-10-12 06:25:57+00:00): Overtagging. It's not needed and only about a third of the address in the area had it anyway.
spod (2022-10-12 09:08:38+00:00): Where was the discussion before you made this mass edit, or where has the UK community agreed and documented that the address:country tag is "not needed"? If it has been agreed by the community, then I have no real problem with it. But if not, then it's not a very valid edit.

A mass edit, removing the tag from 1/3 of the addresses in a large area, should have been discussed by the community first, and followed the code of conduct here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Did that happen? I can't see anything in the talk:GB mailing list.

It would also be great if you could amend the changeset comment so it actually describes what you have done "Remove addr:country=GB", rather than "Address corrections" (which implies that the addresses were 'incorrect', when what you seem to have actually done is just remove information).
Paul Berry (2022-10-12 09:48:31+00:00): Reverted on changeset #127404106.
Paul Berry (2022-10-12 09:58:13+00:00): Thanks. You're right to call out the mass edit. I'll raise the issue in the proper way.

My reasons were: I don't think the tag adds any information, the country code might be better represented as UK anyway, and these tags themselves mostly originated from fhrsid imports in the first place.
spod (2022-10-12 10:38:16+00:00): Thanks a lot. I couldn't find any info about the addr:country tag in the UK-specific discussions/wiki, so not sure if there is community consensus in the UK. 

Personally, I'm a bit wary of edits that just delete stuff based on an idea of "making the data tidier/smaller". There's a lot of 'duplicated' info in the database that could be rationalised (in different ways depending on your viewpoint!), but I think it's more productive to add things!
ovruni (2022-10-11 14:22:55+00:00): Hola, he restaurado el nombre, como le he comunicado anteriormente ya existe el otro nombre en el valor alt_name.
Saludos
Frans S (2022-10-12 15:16:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* You mapped highways through buildings. This is impossible! And an error. 
I comment in another message on the way you tag highways here.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127348638
Frans S (2022-10-12 15:18:33+00:00): Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
You tag an ordinary street as a motorway !
A street as wide as 8 mtr as a path !
Tips 
Connect nodes of highways to each other to achieve a road network which can be used by satellite navigation systems. (these cannot deal with a gap between 2 pieces of roads)

Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.


Tagging of highways:
 
 African countries:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries

Other countries:
 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127348638
nurdafur (2022-11-24 16:24:43+00:00): Hallo pingsler

Du hast in diesem Changeset diesen Wegweiser zugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10091768838/history
Name=Am Wegweiser erscheint mir etwas seltsam. Zudem gibt es keine Zuordnung des Wegweisers. Ist er für Radfahrer, Fußgänger oder etwas anderes?

Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
user_233180 (2022-11-24 21:29:22+00:00): Hi,
das ist so ein historischer Wegweiser. (https://fotos.verwaltungsportal.de/mandate/fotos/woelfersh_wegweiser_p1120780.jpg)
Meiner Erinnerung nach habe ich den nur an die richtige Position geschoben, nicht erstellt :-)
Wo der Name herkommt, ist mir auch nicht ganz klar. Werde ich mal entfernen.
Grüße!
eggie (2022-10-11 10:37:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Normaal gesproken taggen we bij op de bestaande adresnode.
Altijd lastig als twee bedrijven een zelfde adres delen. Ik heb je bidrage samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tanonin (2023-10-29 14:36:12+00:00): Attention les numéros de rue étaient déjà présent sur les batis
tlconrd (2022-10-11 09:58:51+00:00): Regional Parks is responsible for the creation, operation and maintenance of 22 miles of trail with four phases of development. Phase I and II are complete; Phase III and Phase IV are in design and development. Phases I and II are open and comprise 7.5 miles of trail starting at Waterman Avenue behind in San Bernardino to the Riverside County Line.