piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
RodrigoVi (2021-02-15 13:49:43+00:00): lanes:backward et lanes:forward se utilisent si le nb dans un sens différent de autre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:lanes#Voies_dans_les_diff.C3.A9rentes_directions ; avec lanes=3 : lanes:backward=2 et lanes:forward=1 ok sinon dedans https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32450476 inutiles
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
p0wertiger (2021-02-12 03:01:01+00:00): zanim ponownie ktoś zmieni na proposed - owszem, ogłoszono ponowny przetarg, ale już widać wycięte drzewa na trasie, wg opisu GDDKiA prace przygotowawcze już zostały rozpoczęte
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-24 11:02:11+00:00): w takim przypadku warto też zmienić proposed=trunk na construction=trunk

zrobiłem to

(jak masz ochotę inne wykryte problemiki poprawiać - zapraszam na https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/ )
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
eggie (2021-04-25 05:09:07+00:00): Nu ook een bijdrage in Nederland.. daarom Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Warin61 (2021-02-13 08:05:36+00:00): Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.79121&lat=-32.92262&zoom=18
mueschel (2021-02-13 09:39:36+00:00): Hi,
there is no need to tag parking conditions to each and every parking_space. It's sufficient to have this information on the amenity=parking once.

Btw, if you want to use tags like parking_space:condition:3:time_interval and have this information used by anybody, you might want to write a proposal for that.
Warin61 (2021-02-15 05:05:36+00:00): Read all of the proposal for parking_space to aid your understanding.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=629318
Warin61 (2021-03-17 06:35:45+00:00): No attempt to fix the  errors... I'll delete then.
PlaneMad (2021-02-12 15:41:27+00:00): Please check the streams, most of them are not following the topography and are crossing over mountains which are impossible. 

Please enable the OpenCycleMap background layer in Id to get contour details for reference. If you need help, please join the telegram group https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99143594
Glassman (2021-02-13 00:32:57+00:00): From the imagery it appears that Van Ry Blvd is divided, if that is true, then the road should be drawn as two oneway streets.

BTW - adding new roads was one of the things that attracted me to OSM. Show how much power you have.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99143709
mueschel (2021-02-13 09:37:03+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag 'addr:kavel' here. What does it mean and how is it different from the housenumber?
EvertS61 (2021-02-13 20:18:15+00:00): Hi,
"Kavel" is the dutch word for "Lot". "Lot" numbers are originally assigned when the project is under development. When the project is completed and most of the lots have been built on, it can take years, for some projects, before the Government assigns official names to the roads. Only when that has happened the Department of Urban Planning and Development (ROP in Curaçao) will assign the house number which is different from the lot number. So until that moment arrives, homeowners have to use their lot number as their address. (i.e. La Quinta Villas kv.137.) In the meantime, this neighborhood has had the road names placed and assigned a couple of years ago, but many homeowners have to personally present at the Dept. to recollect their house number and pay a fee. Since many have used the lot number for years (in the case of LQV almost 20 years) as their address and have their utilities and everything else registered on that address, they don't see the urgency of recollecting their new house number. This is only the case when the house changes of ownership or is rented to a new family. When they try to apply for utilities and change their address in the civil register it will require them to register with the street name and house number, in which case the owner of the house has to present itself to recollect the number of the house and pay the fee at the Dept. of the Urban Planning and Development. Many homes keep both numbers affixed to their fence or mailbox, since many entities, acquaintances or companies still use the "older" lot number address. For this reason, I decided to add both the house number and the lot number. Hope it's clear. Kind Regards.
mueschel (2021-02-17 18:05:23+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the explanation. I think 'ref:kavel' would be more appropriate here. You could also use the international 'ref:plot' (which is already in use in the UK).

Btw, you also added some 'kavel' tags, it would be nice to be consistent and have only one key for all of them.
EvertS61 (2021-02-18 03:49:19+00:00): Hi,
I will correct those inconsistent "kavel" tags. I think I'll use ref:lot which is more commonly used here in addition to "kavel.
Glassman (2021-02-13 00:34:33+00:00): #TIP: If there is no adequate tag for a building, I just use building=yes. The other option is to tag it with the majority use.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99144141
pio2_122 (2021-02-12 07:48:18+00:00): OSM to nie miejsce na prywatne notatki.
Do wycofania.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99144281
abakus_uploader (2021-02-12 23:32:19+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Glassman (2021-02-13 00:35:41+00:00): #TIP: There is a tag for the website, just add website=https://hemlockstate.com.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99144503
mapper377 (2021-02-12 04:49:50+00:00): Also edit another power line that runs close to the 138 kV line being edited because the other line was overlapping the 138 kV line in some places.
user_5359 (2021-02-12 05:59:38+00:00): Hello (again)! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Specially if you misspell the key to Name.

Please create also a change set comment, which describe your work.

Add react on the comments on your changes.
R0bst3r (2021-02-18 10:37:43+00:00): Hallo Hofmann Bus,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe noch einen Tipp:
* Da du viel mit Relationen arbeitest, empfehle ich dir die nutzung des JAVA Desktop-Editors JOSM https://josm.openstreetmap.de/
Er vereinfacht nicht nur die Arbeit mit Relationen durch einen eigenen Relationeneditor, sondern prüft auch gleich auf Fehler. Leider sind dir bei deinen letzten Bearbeitungen einige unterlaufen. Nicht schlimm, Fehler macht jeder zu Beginn.
Zur Einführung empfehle ich dir ein Tutorial Tutorial https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/2/23/Osm-tutorial.pdf oder den Beginners' guide auf wiki.osm.org. Dort findet man auch Anleitungen zu allen Themen. Ansonsten wird einem unter forum.osm.org gerne geholfen.
Viel Erfolg noch und nicht entmutigen lassen!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99146808
Sowa1980 (2021-02-12 23:33:28+00:00): Просим Вас прекратить механические импорты на  на весь мир или значмиельную территорию!!!
Можно как то более компактнее, в пределах Города села и так далее!

+Технически я понимаю проще Вандалить не каждый проверять такие правки будет.
+ технически мы не можем не одну твою правку доступными всем техническими средствами просмотреть не JOSM ни osmcha ни чем.
+ пакеты которые ты не закрываешь по дням, накидываешь все в один потом дубликаты получаются объектов приходится все заново править.

 Объясни откуда ты берешь данные на всю страну и механические правки свои . По чему данные наборы не выложены для проверки, где согласие от локальных участников региона, на импорты твои?

По чему после твоих изменений происходит постоянные удаление существующих объектов , а в частности, названий улиц постоянное. примеры:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478649396/history#map=16/54.5433/100.6311
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875330961/history

Долго будет продолжаться этот вандализм и массовые импорты не согласованные не с кем?

Просим предоставить тебя на каждое изменние как ты требуешь с других участников проекты, на все пакеты правок накрывающию пол земного шара.

97545810 Комментарий от iWowik 19 дней назад
Есть данные с упомянутых табличек?

Также Вы сами подтверждаете фак,т что вы навмеренно вводите людей в заблуждение прекрываясь свой вандализм ложными данными. Оправдывая свои механические правки на пол страны рассылаете ложную информацию. О соглашениях и голосованиях их небыло !!!

95383823 Комментарий от iWowik 19 дней назад
соблюдайте, пожалуйста принятое в OSM соглашение о наименовании.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Не вынуждайте других частников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать.

Комментарий от iWowik 17 дней назад
По поводу голосования.
Шли, как минимум, активные дискуссии на форуме. Их результат и закреплен в статье вики.

Комментарий от Sowa1980 18 дней назад
По поводу ссылки не нашел на странице где бы были указаны , результаты голосования на которое Вы не однократно ссылаетесь, также не видел что бы информировал , кто то о проведение голосование за это.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98094024#map=3/54.06/65.39
Комментарий от Miroff 18 дней назад
Такая опция есть: выделяешь объект, нажимаешь Ctrl+Alt-Shift+U "Upload selected" и выгружаешь. А вот что действительно неудобно, так это работать с объектами на площади в половину страны.
iWowik (2021-03-17 09:18:36+00:00): Sowa1980, я уже отвечал на подобные вопросы в том числе и в тех правках, комментарии из которых вы тут цитируете.

Но, возможно, вы не читаете или, или не пытаетесь понять.
С огромным удовольствием вам еще раз отвечу:
- Мне не всегда удобно дробить пакеты исправлений, поэтому некоторые пакеты имеют широкую географию. Такие пакеты не запрещены в OSM.
- К тому же они формируются не территориально, а тематически, и их так удобнее обрабатывать.

Я понимаю, что работа с используемыми вами инструментами на моих правках доставляем вам неудобства.

Могу посоветовать вам не только теребить меня, для уменьшения географии правок, а, в первую очередь, авторов инструментов.
Так как, усовершенствованный ими инструмент позволит вам более удобно работать не только  правками iWowik, но и многих других мапперов. Так что это более плодотворный подход к проблеме.
dpolovinkin (2025-01-04 14:51:10+00:00): buildings which you added here are just plain incorrect (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906434051) will delete them all and remap
dpolovinkin (2025-01-04 14:59:08+00:00): the same here... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906434094...
seav (2021-05-08 15:56:33+00:00): Tip: When splitting a closed coastline that also has a place=island/islet tag, don't forget to create a multipolygon relation for the island and transfer the island-related tags from the split coastline ways to the relation.

See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12688075
GOwin (2021-05-08 23:46:09+00:00): Thanks for catching it ! It seems that I missed JOSM's validation warning for that.
mueschel (2021-02-18 12:18:55+00:00): Hi,
the key 'variable_message' doesn't exist anywhere else. What does it mean?
Kovoschiz (2021-02-19 12:13:59+00:00): Really? I know that `traffic_sign=variable_message` is used.
mueschel (2021-02-19 12:29:47+00:00): There is this tag to define the type of message:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/variable_message_information

But in this case it seems that traffic_sign=variable_message would be the appropriate one.
amnesty box (2021-02-23 14:40:20+00:00): What are you trying? Your changes had to be deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99403214
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:44:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
abakus_uploader (2021-02-12 23:32:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
dieterdreist (2021-11-16 23:18:15+00:00): Hi, I have just noted that you removed the courtyard name with the comment "correct wikipedia notation" 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27591708/
user_5359 (2021-11-17 03:36:22+00:00): Hi, the main reason why I became aware of this church was quite correctly noted in the change set comment.I have deleted without the additional tag "man_made=courtyard" senseless name in the process, because I probably did not assign the correct priority (have interpreted version 3 as the cause) to the timid hint 13 years ago in the note of version 2 from you.
dieterdreist (2021-11-17 13:23:18+00:00): Understood. I would not see the name without a typological tag as “senseless”, but rather as incomplete and waiting for someone to amend it. As long as it isn’t wrong we should keep information, even if it is still incomplete or will be filtered out by most current data consumers because it presents the information in a way that is hard to consume or make sense of
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:41:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Hans Thompson (2021-02-12 17:41:15+00:00): These are verified roads and trails. If they are private then they should remain and be tagged as private property.  It is also visible by aerial imagery.   They should not have been removed. 

Please refer to the article on the osm wiki here on what is acceptable to map:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:41:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Dino Michelini (2021-09-02 16:23:34+00:00): Se il lavoro serve ad alimentare Infomont almeno mettetevi nel CAI d'accordo (alias standardizzate) su cosa scrivere nel "name" avete una pagina discussione (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT_talk:CAI), purtroppo da troppi anni, vedo solo confusione, come questo name; alcuni esempi: "Sentiero+ref" o la sua permutazione "ref+ Sentiero", "CAI+ref", "ref", "ref+Sentiero ...", "Strada...", "Variante di collegamento...", "Sentiero attrezzato...", "Località A - Località B - Località C", "Anello di...", "Perimetro...", "red and white stripes", "ref+on white red flags", Raccordo sentiero+ref - Raccordo sentiero+ref".
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-17 15:15:02+00:00): Bonjour,
ce commerce utilise-t-il vraiment l'ensemble du batiment ? ou le batiment est utilisé pour d'autres fonctions (appartement, autre activité, ...) ?
De plus vous n'avez pas ajouté d'attributs pour définir ce qu'est ce commerce ? Vous avez "juste" mis son nom.

Début d'échange pour accompagner votre arrivée dans OSM, bienvenue !
Bonne journée
captain_tapas (2021-02-22 07:11:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vos observations.
La boutique occupe tout le rez-de-chaussée et au dessus il y a des logements (inhabités pour ce que j'en sais). Je n'ai pas su trouver comment rajouter des attributs (c'est un salon de beauté), je vais regarder ça de plus près.
Bonne journée
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-22 07:15:23+00:00): Bonjour,
une réponse, merci :) 
Dans le cas d'usages multiples comme vous le décrivez je vous "conseille" de faire dans ce cas plutôt un "Point" et si vous cherchez Salon de beauté, vous trouverez les attributs adéquats.
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions !
Bonne carto
canfe (2022-05-15 09:12:48+00:00): L'edificio vicino alla farmacia Marafante ha SOVRAPPOSTO un cortile. Un po' come se fosse messo sul tetto.
Gli edifici in questo caso si mappano con una relation.
Ti chiedo di interrompere la tua opera di mappatura e chiedere consigli a mappatori esperti e della zona. Diventa difficile correggere tutto.