piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mgpx (2021-10-10 20:16:08+00:00): Újabb infók az S+-ról:

Az S+ jelzés a Cartographia 2001-es kiadásában még szerepelt. A terepen a jelzések öregek, az alábbi állapot látszott 2021. augusztusában:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qb5eFIgiQZVr-Mcy2T16QWv98DK6E7MW
A völgyoldal jelentős részén kivágták az erdőt. Az OSM-en a megmaradt felfestések közötti szakaszokon a ma létező szekérutakon van a jelzés, de a kivágott fák és az elcserjésedett terület miatt nem egyértelmű, hogy ez volt-e az eredeti nyomvonala.
Mátrakeresztesnél a nyomvonal téves az OSM-en. Nem a galyatetői országúton, hanem mellette, a Kékesi úton megy (vagy ment), ahogy az a Streetviewn is látszik:
https://goo.gl/maps/6zzHAC7MyXG6vb8z5
joost schouppe (2021-10-13 07:43:57+00:00): Zijn de privé-borden hier weggehaald dan?
bxl-forever (2021-09-12 15:19:45+00:00): Fixed by changeset 111100826
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111100826
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:49:55+00:00): Thanks
MxxCon (2021-08-24 23:18:53+00:00): Hello.
Should 'Ideal Vitamins' be tagged as fitness_centre or "shop=health_food"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110189304
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-08-25 02:32:23+00:00): porque retirou as vias internas da auto viação?
henriquewf (2021-08-25 10:44:02+00:00): Porque, no meu entendimento, não existe uma via interna específica e delimitada para tráfego.
i2004 (2021-08-24 23:43:42+00:00): te afirmo que ya se habilito la circunvalación de san salvador
serock (2021-08-25 04:53:01+00:00): Hola, si busque info y corregí todo el tramo habilitado de la RN18, que va desde la RN14 hasta el Arroyo Sandoval.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YaB-N_WJCA
Gracias y Saludos !!!
Glassman (2021-08-25 00:31:56+00:00): Since the Icicle Ridge Trail is made of of segments of highway=path, I don't believe the ref=1570 is needed. However having it doesn't cause a problem. If the trail is marked at 1570 then it's appropriate to add the ref number.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110190342
TJ_B (2021-08-25 15:41:28+00:00): @glassman- thank you for the comment. I am new to OSM and don't totally understand. Is it that the Icicle Ridge Trail is segments of one highway=path and they all share ref=1570 and therefore all the segments do not need it added to them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110190342
Glassman (2021-08-25 18:48:36+00:00): So it's more complex. Icicle Ridge Tail is built as a relation. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9314594. The relation contains the ref tag so it's not needed on individual segments. BTW - I noticed that the first segment that connects to a parking lot in Leavenworth was missing from the relation so I added it. 

Most trails don't require a relation. This trail only needs it because its part of a local network. 

Then there is the big trails, like the PCT that is so large it's made of relation segments. For example here is the north US end of the PCT https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1322978
TJ_B (2021-08-27 15:35:28+00:00): thanks for the explanation. I obviously have a lot to learn about how features are organized in OSM.  It seems really different then ArcGIS.
Glassman (2021-08-27 16:30:47+00:00): That's a big understatement! The wiki can certainly be helpful although at times confusing. Best thing I can suggest is to join us on slack. osmus.slack.com. We have plenty of people that use ArcGIS in their jobs and might be better at explaining things that I am as a QGIS user.
Frans S (2021-08-28 14:54:18+00:00): Hello Thanks for mapping here.
Precise mapped.
just a remark.
Tag buildings allways as building=yes

Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Best regards
literan (2021-08-25 20:55:13+00:00): не совсем понимаю, зачем надо было удалять (мульти)полигоны газонов здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973627076#map=18/55.64450/37.33108

и здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973627074

https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#110191133
Kerkiq (2021-08-27 21:58:27+00:00): Действительно, в чем была проблема этих полигонов? Я их добавлял, что я не так сделал?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
eggie (2021-08-24 20:07:32+00:00): Lijkt me oke..De aansluiting en het fietspad heb ik uitgelijnd conform de BGT omtrekgericht
MVG
eggie
x58 (2021-08-24 20:00:40+00:00): forgot to add source:survey
tekim (2021-08-29 17:51:39+00:00): Hello, thanks for the edits.  

What is the meaning of layer=1 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361995745?

This implies that the whole building is raised off the ground, which isn't the case.

Perhaps you were trying to indicate the number of levels or floors in the building:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110191867
brendan77 (2021-08-29 19:42:58+00:00): I was trying to indicate that the bank is above the drive through. Should I have changed the layer of the road?
tekim (2021-08-29 19:57:05+00:00): Thanks for your reply!

Ah... ok, I understand your intent now.

I would map the drive through separately, tag as building=roof.  I don't think you need a layer=* tag on it, as it is assumed that the roof is off of the ground except for its supports.
hackthemap (2021-09-07 14:56:22+00:00): Hey jodd :)

Danke für die ganzen Ergänzungen in diesem Changeset!
So wie ich das cycleway Tag verstehe sollte cycleway:both nicht einen anderen Wert haben wie cycleway, sondern wenn dann ihn ersetzen.
(Das derzeitige cycleway:both=no impliziert eigentlich ein cycleway=no und ist im Konflikt mit cycleway=opposite)
Die eindeutige Variante, die inzwischen bevorzugt wird so wie ich das Wiki verstehe, wäre dann cycleway:both=none um klar zu machen, dass keine physikalische Infrastruktur vorhanden ist und um zu betonen, dass dies in beide Richtungen der Fall ist die benutzung von "both".
Für die legale Freigabe in Gegenrichtung reicht dann der Tag oneway:bicycle=no

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:both?uselang=en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway?uselang=en

VG
hackthemap
jodd (2021-10-29 20:25:35+00:00): Hallo hackthemap :-)

Bin leider erst jetzt dazu gekommen, mir deinen Hinweis anzuschauen. 

Danke! Ich bevorzuge auch das Tag oneway:bicycle=no für die Freigabe von Einbahnstraßen für Radfahrende. Ich hatte mich allerdings nicht "getraut", das "cycleway=opposite" zu entfernen, da im Wiki hier (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite) steht, dass cycleway=opposite und oneway:bicycle=no auch gemeinsam verwendet werden können.

Ich verstehe aber deinen Punkt mit dem Widerspruch zwischen cycleway=opposite und cycleway:both=no. Das hatte ich übersehen. Habe cycleway=opposite daher entfernt.

VG jodd
hackthemap (2021-10-29 21:34:13+00:00): Hey jodd! :) ja verstehe deine Bedenken, aber glaube inzwischen für mich persönlich, dass der cycleway=opposite tag hautpsächlich aus einer Zeit kommt als es oneway:bicycle=no noch nicht gab und die physikalische Infrastruktur mit der legalen Freigabe zu mischen doch eher unschön und unintuitiv für Mapper und Datenauswerter ist, aber ich verstehe, wenn evtl noch nicht alle den Tag auswerten.
Danke fürs Anpassen! Habe den Kommentar auch nur zur besseren Sichtbarkeit in die Note kopiert, bzw falls jemand anderes etwas dazu sagen kann, sollte keinen Druck aufbauen oder ähnliches falls das so rüber kam! :)
Danke nochmal für die Eintragungen und Anpassungen!

VG hackthemap
DressyPear4 (2021-08-25 11:27:35+00:00): Olá, não é correto sobrepor linhas, selecione o ponto, vá em ferramentas e escolha dividir caminho, depois é só ajustar as informações de cada linha
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110192356
Jonas Lindahl (2021-08-24 20:35:58+00:00): Hi Archie,

It seems as if you have modified my change of the road Vaseliden based on "ortfoto". However I built the road and the source I reported for it is RTK GPS with cm accuracy.

I built the road and the previous road no longer exist.

Br,
Jonas
archie (2021-08-24 20:54:07+00:00): I think you should have a look at the latest change.
Jonas Lindahl (2021-08-24 21:04:59+00:00): Thanks, it now looks correct. As for the small access road (highway=service), your suggestion was actually ok, but Vaseliden is correct now.
literan (2021-08-25 20:51:17+00:00): названия улиц пишутся целиком - Московская улица

Исправлю.
Linda89 (2021-08-30 15:54:14+00:00): спасибо за пояснение ошибки. и за исправление косяка)
julcnx (2021-08-25 01:31:37+00:00): Hello Marco, please kindly use Maxar or ESRI instead of Bing which has outdated imagery in Northern Thailand. Some of the buildings you added do not exists anymore. If you can, please also combine multiple edits in the same area within the same changesets so it is easier for others to review. Just curious, what has adding farming huts to do with a Malaria program? Best, Julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110192623
kartonage (2021-08-25 15:17:04+00:00): Hej,

you are still duplicating buildings. Please stop it.

Thanks.
keithonearth (2022-09-20 19:47:15+00:00): I'm deleting this ice cream parlour in the middle of the forest.
JoeGrim (2021-08-24 20:39:59+00:00): I meant from where it diverts from the West Branch of the Laramie
aachso (2021-08-24 22:30:53+00:00): Hi,

I don't think this is correct. You can't just infer the maxspeed from parallel roads.

Regarding Bushof: Peterstraße and Kurhausstraße have an explicit limit of 30 km/h, but they're not in a 30 km/h zone. So the limit of 30 no longer applies after making a turn. Technically there is no limit other than the general city limit of 50, although I don't think it's realistically driven by bus drivers due to lots of pedestrians walking around this bus terminal.

Regarding the service road near Stiftstraße: I only mapped one part of the way as 10 km/h, because there's a sign at that position. I don't think there's an explicit limit between that sign and (the large) Heinrichsallee.

(Btw I don't think the maxspeed of 30 is correct for the part of Stiftstraße between Heinrichsallee and Heinrichsallee, but that's not part of your edit)
aixbrick (2021-08-25 16:12:19+00:00): Moreover bus:forward on Friedrich-Wilhelm-Platz is unnecessary because it's not an oneway road. "bus=yes" is perfectly adequate.
ATS_Alpenregion (2022-03-25 10:08:31+00:00): Hallo Norbert59, ich trage gerade Informationen über für Räder gesperrte Wege zusammen - ich kann leider nicht nachvollziehen, woher Du die Info zur Wegsperre für den Weg bezogen hast? Ist hier ein Verbot beschildert?
aachso (2021-08-24 21:48:53+00:00): Nice catch. There is in fact a sign that permits left turns for busses, I must have forgotten to add it.

bicycle and bus should be separated by a semicolon though (not comma).
aweech (2021-08-25 00:15:40+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I see that you have been focusing on buildings across NH, so I wanted to give some tips on mapping them. We try to map the bases of buildings, not the roofs. Most buildings have right angles, and the editor that you are using has a few tools to help you draw correct angles. When you select a building and press "q", it will fix the angles. Or you can right click on the building and press the button that looks like a square. Also, the Bing aerial imagery isn't great in a lot of places. I recommend using Esri World Clarity, Esri World, or Mapbox imagery when tracing buildings.

Happy mapping!
somebody839 (2021-08-26 14:06:02+00:00): How do I change from Bing to Esri/Mapbox?
aweech (2021-08-26 14:22:50+00:00): While in the editor, go to the sidebar on the right and press the Background Settings button (the one that looks like three pieces of paper stacked on top of each other). That opens a menu with a whole bunch of options for background imagery.
Jakka (2021-08-29 08:46:08+00:00): Pour ajouter des "building" (maison/house) utilise layer pic pour ajouter correctement la forme ....
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110194829
user_1566574 (2021-08-28 09:31:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Je rajoute mon grain de sel : Il serait préférable de remplacer les attributs building=yes par demolished:building=yes, plutôt que de supprimer le bâti. Si quelqu'un venait à faire un import cadastral, le bâtiment serait de nouveau ajouté, et cette fois sans l'historique.

+ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Pr%C3%A9fixe_cycle_de_vie

Merci de votre contribution !
PT-53 (2022-05-06 16:36:48+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
Du hast diese Zufahrt 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976135924/history
unvollständig eingezeichnet und fälschlicherweise mit diesem Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38915585/history
an diesem Knoten
-https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9033400180/history
verbunden. Das ist aber nur eine Zufahrt in das Obergeschoß dieses Gebäudes
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342531047/history

Bereinigst Du das oder muß ich das machen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-05-07 09:14:40+00:00): Hallo EinEngener, 
ich habe heute Deine "Verbesserungen" verbessert !
felipeeugenio (2021-08-25 14:53:23+00:00): hay que agregar amenity=restaurant o fast_food.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110195968
gordo anorexico (2021-08-25 18:11:16+00:00): Dale, gracias.
jcarlson (2021-08-27 13:23:25+00:00): Cleaning up boundary relations is a task too often overlooked. Thanks for doing this kind work!
Javier Sanchez (2021-08-27 07:13:32+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM.

As you request for review, let me give you this recommendation: please use separate changesets for different locations.

You should have saved the edit of the pharmacy before moving to edit in Kabul.

The resulting changeset span over half of the world and is shown in the feeds of a lot of people who are looking for changes in their region.

Regards
dvdhoven (2021-08-25 06:12:05+00:00): Ik heb bussen omgelegd
eggie (2021-08-25 06:50:34+00:00): Goed om feedback te vragen. 
De wegrichting heb ik op sommige stukken omgekeerd.. oneway=yes toegevoegd .. De routering gaat anders over de verkeerde rijbanen.. 
De busroutes heeft Dick al omgelegd zie ik. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-25 06:55:48+00:00): Verbindingsnode Oversteek Stationsplein toegevoegd met fietspad..  Maak altijd een verbinding met kruisende wegen. 
Je eigen edits.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-25 07:07:29+00:00): oneway=no verwijderd van zuidelijke fietspad..  
Aan de belijning is te zien dat het geen eenrichtingsverkeer is.
eggie (2021-08-25 07:21:22+00:00): Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110196509
Derkades (2021-08-25 08:29:00+00:00): Bedankt voor alle feedback!

> Maak altijd een verbinding met kruisende wegen. 
JOSM gaf geen waarschuwingen, goed om te weten dat ik het zelf ook moet controleren

> De wegrichting heb ik op sommige stukken omgekeerd.. oneway=yes toegevoegd
Ik was er duidelijk niet helemaal bij, je hebt helemaal gelijk ja
eggie (2021-08-25 08:32:12+00:00): No hard feelings 😀
eggie (2021-08-25 08:35:15+00:00): Verder heb ik de juiste G11 fietspad tagging conform de wiki toegevoegd.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-25 06:21:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-25 21:34:55+00:00): Hi Hannah,

Welcome to OSM.

I noticed you added your house here. You should avoid adding personal ownership information as OSM is a public map and not a residential directory.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
serock (2021-08-25 00:06:05+00:00): Hola, le mande varios mensajes por privado y por acá, usted hace muchas modificaciones que “NO” son reales, tunes, autopistas, bajo nivel, etc. Si pudiera usar algún medio de comunicación para aclarar las cosas seria muy bueno, por que el tiempo que usted emplea en hacer sus modificaciones, otros usuarios tiene que perder de su tiempo para restaurar sus cambios y esto no es una guerra de modificaciones, esto es un proyecto comunitario donde hay normas que cumplir y "castigos" para otorgar.
Le dejo un link para que mire, saludos !!!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina#Contacto
Tomas Straupis (2021-08-25 05:15:58+00:00): Atstačiau sugadintą dviračių ir pėsčiųjų tako žymėjimą. Kai takas skirtas abiems, tai tada nededam nei highway=footway, nei highway=cycleway, o bendrinį highway=path ir greta pridedam foot=designated bei bicycle=designated. Plačiau čia: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
MindaugasS (2021-08-26 00:23:43+00:00): Supratau, ačiū.
Marmanvii (2021-08-25 00:10:23+00:00): Aprendiendo a usar JOSM pase a borrar unas restricciones en unas avenidas, lo arreglo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110197706
lonnez (2022-08-05 03:15:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution! Though it looks like you set one of the foot paths as a bench. I fixed it, but wanted to let you know. Also, please avoid personal information added to the map, e.g. "Hannah's House".
tekim (2021-08-25 21:40:19+00:00): Thanks for the further edits. A meadow in OSM is "an area of land primarily vegetated by grass plus other non-woody plants, mainly used for hay (meadow) or for grazing animals (pasture).",  the area you tagged as a meadow is might be better tagged as landuse=grass.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110198191
eggie (2021-08-25 06:30:34+00:00): Hi ASD

This was a duplicated address.. not an official BAG address.
I deleted the node.
Gr eggie
ASD020 (2021-08-25 09:15:18+00:00): Hi eggie,
Thank you for pointing this out and fixing it. I will read the pages you linked before I continue.
Gr ASD
kartonage (2021-08-26 15:46:34+00:00): Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

it seems like you have tagged buildings as "industrial" although they look more "residential" from aerial imagery. Are you sure that these buildings are in fact industrial?

Best regards
lectrician1 (2021-08-25 01:57:21+00:00): WOWSERS
Mundilfari (2021-08-25 03:04:40+00:00): :). This is a never-ending project...
Chris Lawrence (2021-08-26 17:45:11+00:00): Please be more careful in merging features - the roundabout at US 19/GA 26 was split into segments for a reason (to ensure relations were contiguous).

Also, please stop promoting residential streets and dirt roads to primary/secondary w/o verifying importance in field.
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-27 02:39:07+00:00): Hi @Chris Lawrence.  Regading "promoting residential streets and dirt roads", I don't see any of that in this changeset.  If you could comment on the changeset that has the problem, it would be more helpful for the community to understand where there might be a problem.
txemt (2021-08-27 03:14:28+00:00): I'm only promoting streets and dirt roads based on Georgia DOT's functional classification site https://itos.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=962a2591f91a4303aeafe016ba8db96b and the OSM wiki for Georgia in regards to functional classification https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Georgia_(U.S._state)
Minh Nguyen (2021-08-27 07:11:54+00:00): Hi, you spotted a very outdated line on the wiki that was added back in 2009, before the U.S. community had really coalesced around any best practices for road classification. I think it just got overlooked in the years since. I’m sorry it wound up causing confusion.

In general, a state DOT’s functional classification system can be a useful starting point for road classification in OSM. However, it needs to be taken with a grain of salt, in part because the internationally developed highway=* key has values that don’t align with HFCS.

The longstanding U.S. standard for OSM road classification isn’t strictly tied to any DOT classifications: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Road_classification . (You may be interested in a recent proposal to refresh the standard: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Highway_classification .) There’s also a separate key, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:HFCS , that allows you to indicate the functional classification regardless of any other considerations.
txemt (2021-08-27 11:54:34+00:00): I understand that the page may be from 2009, but it's still out there as a solid piece of instruction for Georgia. If I were editing in Texas or Alabama, I wouldn't use that reference, I'd use the reference for that specific state. I also don't believe it has caused any confusion. I did some research before starting on this project. I found that wiki, found a good source for classification of roads within the state, and I set about doing it. I have found the only roads classified in the state are Principal Arterials. Everything else is just a "I think this road will be this level of highway." 

 I've read the proposal, but it's just that....a proposal. I've also read the wiki discussion on trunk roads. I've also had a long conversation about functional classification with TxDot back when I was editing for another GPS app and the person in charge of that state. I wanted to get a better understanding of how it worked, how it was decided a road gets the classification, as well as how they determine updates and when they do updates. It was a very eye opening discussion.

I've also stated somewhere, every state will have anomalies within their system. Dirt roads may be classed as something they shouldn't be classified as, at least to the untrained eye, but each DOT has a reason for classifying the roads they classify.
Chris Lawrence (2021-08-27 17:36:07+00:00): @ZeLoneWolf: This changeset contains a good example of the functional classification problem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110312893. See also e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108454959.
txemt (2021-09-01 14:50:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Txemt#State_of_Georgia
MapSpot (2021-08-25 18:31:56+00:00): Hi Kevo. Thanks for adding more natural terrain detail for river.

Just wanted to note that waterway=riverbank is now considered a deprecated tag for river areas, despite still being a present in JOSM. Since all of Canada's rivers now use natural=water and water=river for river areas, I'd suggest you use those tags to future-proof your work and keep everything consistent with the national standard.
MapSpot (2021-08-25 18:33:37+00:00): It also isn't necessary to add a name=* tag for river areas if there is already a waterway drawn though it that has the name. That way the same POI isn't named twice.
Kevo (2021-08-25 18:56:04+00:00): Ah shoot, thanks for the heads up.  Maybe my JOSM isn't up to date with the tagging changes.  I'll take a look with overpass turbo to try and find/fix the issues.
MapSpot (2021-08-26 02:01:34+00:00): Aw no problem. Already fixed the four riverbank tags from yesterday. They're easy to spot because they stick out like a sore thumb in Canada on TagInfo: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/waterway=riverbank#map

JOSM has still been slow to adopt the new tagging presets, so it's hardly your fault. For more info on the global phasing-out of waterway=riverbank, there's a wiki page for it here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization