piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alphensebezorger (2021-01-19 21:20:09+00:00): Hallo CartoKees,
In de BAG Viewer zie ik deze adressen nog wel staan (zie https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/#?searchQuery=1859200000844845). Loopt de BAG Viewer dan achter op de actualiteit, of heb jij een andere verklaring? Gebruik je de BAG plug-in voor deze update?Het lijkt trouwens wel zo te zijn dat de postcode verwijderd is bij de BAG Viewer.
Groetjes, Alphensebezorger.
CartoKees (2021-01-20 18:51:27+00:00): Hallo Alphensebezorger,
De BAG viewer heeft gelijk. (En is eigenlijk ook altijd actueel). Ik vond het al zo raar dat 2 garageboxen geen adres zouden hebben. Ze zijn teruggezet.  De WMS laag is mijn bron voor de ingetrokken adressen. Tot nu toe was dat goed gegaan.
CartoKees
mini-me (2021-01-17 21:44:44+00:00): Без пояснений мы имеем остановки с одинаковым названием на маршруте, что не нравится ни мне, ни османду )
Также, в 99% случаев такая запись избавляет от необходимости создавать рядом две остановки с разными названиями
yuryleb (2021-01-18 20:32:16+00:00): Так на табличке остановки написано, а это первый источник для name. Помещайте "полное" описание в description, например, и научите османд его показывать тоже.
mini-me (2021-01-18 22:58:31+00:00): Нет смысла жертвовать удобством только ради соответствия name и надписи на табличке. А добиться изменений в приложении, у которого 1.8k открытых issues... у меня нет такой суперсилы.
hvalentim (2021-01-21 16:22:54+00:00): Bing aerial imagery is often misaligned!  For any given spot you should always compare more than one source of aerial imagery. Also, where available, compare with and give preference to the national network of survey_points (Rede Geodésica Nacional). In Matagosa you messed the existing work.
hvalentim (2021-01-21 16:33:27+00:00): Additionally you broke relation 8254930
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
hvalentim (2021-01-21 16:36:03+00:00): And connected steps with a wall. In your experience do staircases usually end in walls?
kcpels (2021-01-21 16:47:35+00:00): Hi, I've been editing (mostly adding to) this area for months and it's the first time I've gotten either good or bad feedback - I hope I didn't screw anything up too badly. Seems to me that all your comments relate to the miradouro do cristo rei at matagosa, which indeed did not align with the Bing image. What are other sources of aerial imagery I could use for the future? Furthermore, as I've been to the miradouro multiple times in the past month, the arrangement of monuments was out of place which is why I was editing those points. In the future I will not disturb the survey points. As for the relation, I'm guessing that was the trail Grand Rota de Zezere, which was inaccurate to the path of the trail in reality and I thought I fixed but apparently not - i deleted the erroneous part and added new trail with the relation, not sure where I went wrong there. Finally, as for the stairs ending at a wall, this does not seem a major issue to me (the stairs to the miradouro do end where the wall begins), and I got an error before saving my changes when they were not connected. Thanks for your feedback and I hope to not create such errors in the future.
hvalentim (2021-01-22 09:56:19+00:00): More reliable all around sources of aerial imagery are "ESRI World Imagery", "Ortofotos 25 cm - Portugal Continental - 2018 (DGT)" and "Ortofotos 50cm - Portugal Continental - 2004-2006 (DGT)". Also, consider switching from iD to a more capable editor such as JOSM.
Relation 8254930 is this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8254930
kcpels (2021-01-22 12:01:17+00:00): Obrigado
eggie (2021-01-17 21:39:27+00:00): Dag Gettie.. Hier lijkt iets niet helemaal goed gegaan.
Aan de westzijde is toch al de natuurbegraafplaats aangegeven.
Is dit een uitbreiding?
access=no wil zeggen Verboden toegang. 
Je mag hier dus kennelijk niet komen.
Denk beter niet beginnen met access=ni
Wel kun je vehicle (of bicycle) = no toevoegen.
Vdrder een valk op een ander vlak geeft problemen met de redering. Dat is als starter nog lastig op te lossen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-17 21:46:33+00:00): access=no verwijderd
paden losgemaakt van landuse
augxcgrwxo (2021-01-18 06:39:47+00:00): @Literan, доброе утро! Хотел уточнить, есть ли у вас возможность отменить удаление здания, которое находилось в координатах 55.89222,37.59668? Я увидел что сейчас его нет на карте, но на местности под деревьями там находится 1 этажная постройка непонятного назначения.
literan (2021-01-18 11:30:55+00:00): вообще, проще заново нарисовать, чем искать его ID... Сейчас отрисую

На том месте, где это здание было нарисовано, на снимке ничего не было.
Jarek 🚲 (2021-01-18 13:36:52+00:00): FYI bounds of this neighbourhood are already mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677481104 so I deleted the node
eggie (2021-01-17 21:42:17+00:00): Beste op een highway=footway hoef je niet aan te geven dat je er niet mag fietsen of met een auto mag komen. Dat is default.
access=no betekent Verboden toegang Hier mag dus helemaal niemand komen?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-17 21:54:16+00:00): access=no verwijderd...
nodes vastgemaakt aan omliggende wegen. het zou anders niet routeren.
Correctie straatnaam naar Leeuwerikstraat. 
mvg
eggie
karson_ (2021-08-06 14:30:31+00:00): Hi, your edits at Coyote Creek GC have a lot of issues. You marked driveways as golf cartpaths, clearly wrong. You also overlapped exclusive landuses. A fairway cannot overlap a putting green or the rough, etc.
karson_ (2021-08-06 14:32:57+00:00): + the buildings you added were very low quality. You need to trace every contour of the roof line. Not just a rectangle. Buildings use 90 degree angles, you also failed to square the buildings.
Map-Peter (2021-01-19 22:43:03+00:00): Hallo petzmcpetz, 
 
willkommen bei OSM! :-) 
 
Die Tankstelle mit den Namen "Citti Tank" ist bereits in OSM vorhanden ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654807952 ). 
Deshalb habe ich "name=Citti Tank" gerade wieder vom Gebäude entfernt - siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names . 
 
Den "ideditor:walkthrough_progress" hast du, wie jeder oben sehen kann, leider nur begonnen, aber nicht abgeschlossen. 
Das sollte jeder neue Mapper komplett durchlaufen bevor er loslegt. 
 
Ich empfehle dir außerdem: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite 
 
Solltest du mal ein Frage haben, schreibe mir einfach - ich bin oft hier. 
 
Gruß Peter
literan (2021-01-18 18:13:53+00:00): с чего вдруг скворечник стал туристической достопримечательностью?
solenoid jam (2021-01-20 06:52:43+00:00): Может быть по тому что он сделан очень хорошо, и на него показывают пальцем?
Вообще субъективно он так и воспринимается, как какая-то ВАУ-штука в определенном месте.
literan (2021-01-20 10:25:29+00:00): т.е. туда возят группы туристов посмотреть на скворечник? если будет пруф на столь неординарное утверждение, я готов согласиться.
solenoid jam (2021-01-20 11:43:24+00:00): А экскурсии не критерий.  В то же время критерием может быть например художественная ценность объекта расположенного в публичном пространстве. Форма и материалы домика однозначно говорят о том что он создавался не как функциональная коробка с дыркой, а как эстетический объект привлекающий внимание людей пришедших в парк.
Впрочем, я не настаиваю на том что это достопримечательность, у меня за этот объект сердце не щимит. Я отметил так, если угодно можете убрать тэг, нет смысла спорить. 
Сам убирать тэг не готов, ибо мапить вопреки собственной добродетельности это вандализм.
literan (2021-01-20 11:49:36+00:00): критерии указаны в вики, и это - "интересно туристам". Всё.
amadvance (2021-01-18 17:39:24+00:00): Ciao Cortix,

Ho visto che hai tolto l'attributo MTB:scale dal sentiero 727. E una cosa intenzionale ?

Ho fatto quel sentiero l'anno scorso in MTB e la scala di difficoltà mi pare adeguata. 

E' un problema se la rimetto almeno nei tratti di sentiero che ho fatto ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nZuazedZmk

Ciao,
Andrea
Cortix (2021-01-18 17:57:55+00:00): Ciao, volevo alzare la difficoltà ma poi mi sono dimenticato... Non vorrei che sia fuorviante e alcuni principianti si mettano a farlo soprattutto in discesa. Non è affatto banale... Ciao, sistema pure il pezzo che hai fatto ma alza di uno step la difficoltà.
amadvance (2021-01-19 07:03:16+00:00): Fatto. Ho aggiunto due bei pezzi a difficoltà 3. Ma tieni presente che per la maggior parte la difficoltà è 2. Non bisogna neanche eccedere in quanto va classificato la difficoltà prevalente e non quella massima.
Cortix (2021-01-19 09:37:42+00:00): Ok, va bene 3 così la maggior parte si scoraggiano a farlo...
DressyPear4 (2021-01-20 21:06:14+00:00): Olá, tente não grudar tantos pontos nas vias,
fica muito difícil ter que ajustar depois,
py_berrard (2021-01-18 19:52:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Les commerces n'ont pas de raison d'être séparés des bâtiments.
J'ai donc annulé ces changements.
mariotomo (2021-06-05 16:39:18+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-80.26355&lat=8.63425&zoom=8

(evidencia como estas calles forman una "isla" pues no están conectadas a la carretera principal.)
mariotomo (2021-06-05 16:41:01+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-80.36091&lat=8.53222&zoom=17&opacity=0.52
(sorry, te pasé el enlace anterior)
compdude (2021-02-15 02:06:00+00:00): Clearly looks like a trunk to me.
vorpalblade (2021-01-22 18:50:41+00:00): In one of your later changesets, I made a comment about squaring items that should be square. I've done it for this building.

Thanks for your contribution,
vorpalblade
vorpalblade (2021-01-22 18:48:58+00:00): Thanks for this. I just checked and none of the new roads are in current aerial imagery. :(

Anyway, I've added the addresses.
vespax (2021-01-22 18:51:44+00:00): Brand spanking new roads they just built.
eggie (2021-01-17 22:49:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-18 14:39:55+00:00): Je vraaht om een review.. Lijkt me correct zo. Een track kun je nog wel voorzien van een tracktype.
Zie wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-18 22:39:35+00:00): Ik heb lokale mapper Commodoortje even om advies gevraagd.
Die weet vast wel van de hoed en de rand hier. 

MVG
eggie
Glassman (2021-01-18 06:49:57+00:00): Tip: tagging a driveway as private is kind of redundant since we consider driveways as private by default. Though tagging them shouldn't be a big issue.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97655218
Glassman (2021-01-18 07:01:36+00:00): Tip: Unclassified is the designation of a residential road typically found in rural areas. Because OSM was started in England we use their road classification system. If it's not a public maintained road, it could be classified as a service road.

FYI - The county shows the road on the southside as South Road. The road heading north is Harbor Reach Drive. If you can verify the names can you update OSM? Let me know if you need any help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97655399
seattlefyi (2021-01-17 23:23:31+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for editing! I see that you've added foot=no to the street here, but from imagery there appears to be a sidewalk alongside the street, so that doesn't appear to be correct, and should be removed. Can you please explain your change? Thanks.
EricMuk (2021-01-17 23:40:58+00:00): There is a construction company on the north side of 121st St SW.   Trucks are filled with raw materials - gravel, rock, dirt - stored on the site.  Large commercials trucks use this road continually during the business week.  Pedestrians should be very cautious if they chose to use this street during these times.
vorpalblade (2021-01-22 18:45:55+00:00): Thank you for using a fairly recent aerial imagery for your edits.

Another editor (JOSM) has access to 2019 and 2020 aerial imagery as well, but the learning curve is a bit steeper. The newer aerial imagery isn't available in iD (the editor you used) for technical reasons.


Anyway, your edit looks pretty good. About the only comment I have (right now) is that you should probably square up items that are supposed to be squarish. In iD, I believe the keyboard shortcut is `q`. All it does is make all the angles 90 degrees (although I _think_ it may also do 45 degrees).
mariotomo (2022-05-20 23:25:34+00:00): hola. cuidado con la ortografía pues el nombre es Sabanagrande todopegado.

para las próximas: puedes apoyarte a https://www.inec.gob.pa/archivos/P3551Nomenclatura.xls

gracias!
Pavelfantik (2021-01-18 15:46:18+00:00): с таким тегом школа исчезла с карты
4004 (2021-01-18 16:15:01+00:00): ну можно на здание теги повесить? сам тег то правильный
Pavelfantik (2021-01-19 18:40:54+00:00): больше нравится на территории. я за старый тег
4004 (2021-01-19 18:46:18+00:00): на тызенгауза уже давно этот тег, он все же правильный - это же не общеобразовательная школа
ndm (2021-01-18 20:11:42+00:00): You're removing/changing stuff that was carefully surveyed on foot -- at least check on Mapillary before modifying things -- will revert items as necessary (again).
ndm (2021-01-21 19:38:48+00:00): Your edit broke two major cycle routes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1318928
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5479822

Please fix if you can. If not see if I can.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
xronos (2021-01-18 11:45:19+00:00): Что значить: "Знаки не согласованы ни с кем" ?
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-18 02:29:02+00:00): هذا التحرير غير صحيح ولا وجود لهذا المكان في الواقع
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-18 07:56:59+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97678676

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious