piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Arnaud Champollion (2022-06-11 14:16:55+00:00): Bonjour,
L'impasse n'a jamais disparu, voir l'historique https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306072671/history#map=18/44.08849/6.15627
Simplement, lors de la dernière édition par une classe de l'école de Champtercier, que j'ai accompagnée, et qui est venue contribuer sur la zone cette année, elle est passée de "rue résidentielle" à "sentier" sans que je ne souvienne de la raison (probablement une erreur).
Je note que votre dernière modification ne rétablit pas la qualification d'origine (rue résidentielle) mais en donne une nouvelle (voie d'accès) ; à voir ce qui est le plus pertinent.
Danchev (2022-06-09 15:40:10+00:00): Hi,
who at university is responsible for your mapping?
Arnaud Champollion (2022-06-11 14:22:59+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai l'impression qu'il y a une confusion entre le nom et la qualification ("terrain multisports").
Sur Openstreetmap, le "nom" désigne le nom propre (par exemple "Stade Jean Rolland"). La qualification de l'objet doit être portée par d'autres attributs.
Par ailleurs, il me semble sauf erreur que ces deux terrains sont exclusivement des terrains de tennis, c'était le cas lors de notre passage à l'automne 2021 en tout cas.
gscscnd (2022-06-09 20:33:40+00:00): 1. Nadal wydaje mi się, że zamiast spur powinno być yard.
2. siding nie powinno obejmować całego <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295354069>. Północna końcówka za ostatnim rozjazdem (przed płotem) to spur lub yard.
3. tourism=theme_park oczywiście ma tutaj pewien sens, ale jednak głównie chodzi o stację, więc bardziej pasowałoby mi tourism=attraction.
user_6920396 (2022-06-09 21:11:37+00:00): A wiadomo na jaką prędkość maksymalną przystosowany jest szlak kolejowy Stanica - Rudy - Paproć - Stodoły?
gscscnd (2022-06-09 21:19:25+00:00): Ja niestety nie wiem, ale być może ktoś związany ze skansenem mógłby Ci pomóc.
eggie (2022-09-07 19:18:46+00:00): Dag Hidde.. Dit soort wijzigingen zijn niet te controleren. Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus  levert vaak schade op door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van obkecten met alles dat er aan vast zit.
Wat je allemaal hebt gedaan is nauwelijks na te gaan.
Beperk je gebied to bv een straat.
MVG
eggie
HiddeV22 (2022-09-07 21:00:56+00:00): Nee, dit was niet zo handig nee, ik zal het in de toekomst anders doen.
eggie (2022-09-07 21:03:23+00:00): Oke Top!
Groet
Eggie
ElliottPlack (2022-07-26 20:02:02+00:00): Hi there. Elliott here with OSM Data Working Group. Another user deleted this data here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123738022#map=15/32.0176/-81.1839 . Do you have it on good authority that the edits here do exist?
davegis (2023-04-17 13:28:15+00:00): The new warehouse in reality is there on good authority. I drive by it everyday and see surveyors and workers getting it ready to open.
kapazao (2022-06-10 19:07:01+00:00): Hi, are you sure that this is amenity=water_point?
It does not seem to be that inside a house, could you check it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122172692
Cristian Valls (2022-06-11 16:36:47+00:00): Yes, it's correct. It's in the house's wall.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122172692
Frans S (2022-07-13 13:09:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Mostly the buildings are small and rectangular. No fancy layouts.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122172712
Frans S (2022-06-29 11:53:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122172838
user_5359 (2022-06-15 13:55:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/137638795. What is the meaning of the tag toboggan = no?
gscscnd (2022-06-09 20:24:00+00:00): name na <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068268865> jest zbędne, mamy już <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2993963457>.
ivanbranco (2022-06-09 17:34:00+00:00): Hi pmc_

please note that the correct value in OSM is place=neighbourhood and not neighborhood :)

good mapping!
pmc_ (2022-06-09 18:37:22+00:00): thank you! it's easy to forget to use the british spelling
Frans S (2022-06-29 10:17:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.






Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122174152
Cristoffs (2022-11-17 18:24:21+00:00): Las był tu już wcześniej. Co chciałaś dodać?
Frans S (2022-06-28 10:28:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Mapping of roads is not a part of this project. But, if you map roads, don't forget to tag them properly. See this wiki 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Best regards
Frans S (2022-07-16 08:18:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions). You very often map buildings twice or more of their size.

Check if there is a shadow visible next to an object. 
If not, is there a trace of human activity (walking, lighter color of the ground). If not, it certainly not a building.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122174371
Frans S (2022-06-29 10:19:46+00:00): Hello. See my previous comment on your mappings.  
Your mappings are a bit oversized and not squared.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122174393
Kovoschiz (2022-06-09 17:11:55+00:00): `bus_bay=left` is the correct tag. It is not a bus lane, nor a bike lane. Don't count it in `lanes=` either. `cycleway:left=share_busway` is not correct here, or anywhere in HK.
Patrickov (2022-06-12 16:37:44+00:00): Replaced with something else.  The signs there asked cyclists to dismount so re-pathed to reflect the regulations there.  The resulting short stretches is the ridiculousness on the part of the related authorities but if the structures are like that so be it.
goldenkingohfive (2022-06-15 18:17:12+00:00): Hello! I'm glad your interested in cycle infrastructure here in Fort Wayne! If you would please check over https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway on the wiki.
The correct way to map on road cycle way would usually be via tags unless there is a physical barrier like cement blocking the cycle way fro the main road. For the time being i will try and update tags on roads and remove the cycle way ways where needed. If you have more questions or anything else feel free to reply to this message or dm me. have a nice day and thank you for you contribution!
Frans S (2022-07-11 15:07:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please do not oversize the mappings. Often you map them 2-3 x the size!
Frans S (2022-07-19 15:04:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
You overlooked most of the buildings here.
Just tag a building always as building=yes



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122174719
kepivar (2022-08-25 10:49:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
alyaa_hossam (2022-06-12 11:04:40+00:00): Hello alain2003;
I noticed you removed some ways that already exist in the new satellite image, We edited these ways and updated them according to the last image we used in "Maxar SecureWatch 2021-11-24"
I Reverted the highways you removed as it was
link for ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725818154/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/567959596/history
Regards
alyaa_hossam
alain2003 (2022-06-12 12:42:10+00:00): Hello,
Sorry for that,last time i visited the area was back in december 2019,and there was nothing.
best regards
alyaa_hossam (2022-06-12 13:58:09+00:00): Hello alain 2003;
Thank you for your response, Happy Mapping!
Regards
alyaa hossam
ivanbranco (2022-06-10 19:58:01+00:00): Ciao Edo,

anche qua hai aggiunto tre ref:mise identici.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992682147/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855780633
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2361536395/

I ref:mise sono codici univoci e identificano un solo benzinaio.
EdoBoo (2022-06-14 08:06:32+00:00): Non saprei, io ho preso quelli che mi suggeriva OSMOSE (è la prima volta che aggiungo questa tipologia di dati). In ogni caso il 2° e 3° sono lo stesso distributore (uno è il punto, l'altro l'areale), per il primo non saprei. 
Se sai come sistemare fai pure, io non so dove prendere questi dati.
Frans S (2022-06-30 11:34:36+00:00): Hallo. Bedankt voor het mappen in dit project.
Even een opmerking. Je hebt een paar  lichte plekken als een gebouw gemapt. 
Dit waren geen gebouwen. Let op de aanwezigheid van een schaduw. Die laat zien dat een object zich boven de grond bevind. Ook de sporen rond een object, lichtere grond, wijzen op een bebouwd object.
Vriendelijke groeten
user_5359 (2022-06-12 17:40:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/780300502 (one of three ways). What is the meaning of the tag liyt = yes? Did you mean lit=yes?
voschix (2022-06-13 07:39:37+00:00): fixed - thank you
mariotomo (2022-06-10 01:44:09+00:00): more than "adding details", this is part of a larger reorganization action where administrative centres tagged as "hamlet" are raised to "village".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122175743
Cristoffs (2022-11-17 18:21:54+00:00): ale .... jak to? Znaczy go nie ma, a chcesz by tam był? Nie rozumiem ...
mariotomo (2022-06-10 01:43:37+00:00): more than "adding details", this is part of a larger reorganization action where administrative centres tagged as "hamlet" are raised to "village".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122175850
literan (2022-06-14 18:20:51+00:00): временное не мапим (тем более неверными тегами)
GinaroZ (2022-06-09 22:17:05+00:00): Any particular reason why you added the bicycle restrictions? As it already has access=private
NickBroon (2022-06-10 10:49:40+00:00): To try and prevent cycling routing like this: https://www.cyclestreets.net/journey/81943587/
that gives direction straight through the cargo area of the airport.
GinaroZ (2022-06-12 20:19:11+00:00): That is surely a problem with CycleStreets rather than the tagging though, as the OSM website routers manage fine: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=55.9554%2C-3.3419%3B55.9481%2C-3.3603#map=15/55.9424/-3.3435
GinaroZ (2022-06-21 15:28:20+00:00): This was raised with CycleStreets: https://twitter.com/OSMScotland/status/1535219713114005506 - basically your end point was geolocated to the private roads, whereas if the end point was the terminal it wouldn't have used the private roads!
Frans S (2022-06-30 14:02:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Rectangular buildings, not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122176099
Frans S (2022-06-30 14:03:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Rectangular buildings, not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122176099
Frans S (2022-07-23 13:04:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
You overlooked many (small buildings)




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122176105
Cristoffs (2022-11-17 18:25:48+00:00): Dlaczego opisałaś zmiana własciciela. Zmieniłaś tylko rodzaj sklepu.
Frans S (2022-06-15 10:13:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
You mapped with an offset of appr 5 mtr. Did you alter something on you imagery?

E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.

You mapped a number of traces which are actually no buildings. Please check if there is a shadow next to your object. if Yes, probably a building, above groundlevel. if not. don't map it. 





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122176276
Frans S (2022-07-05 08:57:11+00:00): Hallo Lianne. Bedankt voor het mappen . Een paar opmerkingen.
Een gebouw identificeren is niet altijd gemakkelijk, Kijk of er een schaduw aanwezig is. Geen schaduw, meestal geen gebouw. Ook helpt het als er een pad in de buurt is of dat de grond rondom het object belopen is.Je hebt hier 4 objecten als een gebouw gemapt. Jammer. Geen gebouw dus.
Je ziet ook wel omheinde gebieden. (vee corral) meestal duidelijk omdat er aan beide kanten van een muur(haag) een schaduw te zien is.
Succes met mappen.
vr groeten
felipeeugenio (2022-06-09 21:51:57+00:00): Buena. Tienes alguna tarjeta de la cancha con un mapa? busqué en internet y no encontré nada.
saludos
Daniel Bräuning (2022-06-23 18:15:33+00:00): Hola, si te puedo enviar una que tengo aca! donde te la envio?
felipeeugenio (2022-06-23 18:18:21+00:00): buena, gracias
felipe.edwards@gmail.com

saludos
francians (2022-06-09 19:39:50+00:00): Ciao,

Grazie per il contributo.. la way che hai aggiunto non ha etichette! Puoi verificare?

Grazie mille
Buona serata
Francesco
Frans S (2022-07-20 14:47:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122176995
Glassman (2022-06-12 22:02:21+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. One suggestion - since it's not a actual dog park, you could tag the area landuse=grass - that way it won't show up as a dog park.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122177024
Cristoffs (2022-11-17 18:20:35+00:00): Prosze opisuje swoje zmiany troszkę "bardziej" ;-)
VA00 (2022-11-19 16:52:56+00:00): Proszę przetłumaczyć komentarz na polski :-)
Frans S (2022-07-12 11:36:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122177113
The_Nickname (2024-01-01 21:00:35+00:00): Hallo ulp,
danke für deinen Beitrag!
Ich habe den POI nochmal geupdated, also ein paar Infos ergänzt und den Öffnungszeitensyntax angepasst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9807014731/history).
Falls du vorhast weiterhin ab und zu zu OSM beizutragen kann ich dir StreetComplete(https://streetcomplete.app) oder/und EveryDoor(https://every-door.app) empfehlen, ersteres ist DIE Spazierengeh-App schlechthin und gut für (Wieder-)Einsteiger geeignet. EveryDoor oder etwa Mapcomplete könnten aber auch für interesse sein, falls du bei deinem POI noch weitere Details hinzufügen möchtest.
Ich hoffe du hattest ein gutes Jahr und willkommen (zurück) bei OSM, zögere nicht mir(auch wenn ich noch kein Experte bin) oder anderen Mitgliedern der OSM-Community fragen zu stellen, wenn du welche hast.

MfG Nick
Frans S (2022-06-22 10:15:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping .
Please map round buildings more in according to their size
You map buildings with a diameter of 6 meter or more, despite they are just 3 meter in diameter.
Best regards
Glassman (2022-06-12 22:02:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. I noticed you fixed the landuse in a subsequent edit!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122177383
Frans S (2022-06-29 09:32:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.

Link to a picture of these mappings:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FJRDS2w4wGWh85vKs4CBGTirtnc_JIOE/view?usp=sharing



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122177631
Glassman (2022-06-12 22:08:17+00:00): I'm surprised that Railroad  Avenue doesn't allow bicycles. Can you verify the restriction?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122177702
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-09 23:47:14+00:00): Hello,

There doesn't appear to be a park here, this looks like it's someone's private front yard.

We define parks in a particular way on OSM:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
radhe_nash (2022-06-10 06:06:01+00:00): I mistakenly uploaded this change. Can you help in reverting this ?
Frans S (2022-07-13 10:09:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122177903