piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
goltapan (2020-09-11 17:55:32+00:00): Hi Skyper, 
Thanks for looking into my edit. I have edited based on the imagery which was slightly offset. I have modified the roads as per your suggestion (change set: 90771290 ). I Genuinely apologize for the miss from my end. I have added service roads based on point data and Building looks like commercial/Industrial entity (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice) . Do you think it should be a driveway? I would be happy to know your view on this.
skyper (2020-09-12 12:35:23+00:00): Hi

The best aligned imagery concerning angles is Esri. It is usually the one with the least offset, as-well. Maxar and Bing are most of the time newer but of less quality. Additionally there is Maps4BW for building outlines and names, house numbers and more, which is quite accurate. But all that is written on the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Freiburg_im_Breisgau#Luftbilder_.2F_Hintergrund

As I already wrote in German, but your translation software seems to be not suited for longer sentences, in my opinion, all these service roads are more or less only driveways. Note, "driveway" in OSM has a bit different meaning than the common meaning in the US. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway

As they all lead across private ground, at least access=permissive is appropriate.

The ways on the west-hand side, might be even no service roads at all and amazon won`t need them as there is no address at all and the man_made=work has the entry on different sides but not from the east.

Cheers skyper
goltapan (2020-09-14 11:05:38+00:00): "hi skyper, 
thanks for the detailed explanation. we are talking with DWG to take a long term decision. We will be happy to implement the changes whatever that benefits the larger community, but want to make sure it is accepted by all the community members. In the past few community members informed us not to add access information to driveways. Once DWG members inform us the corrective action, will inform it to the all the community members and get it implemented as well. Thanks again for the suggestion"
John_mapper (2020-08-19 06:01:02+00:00): Hallo Segubi, warum hast du hier die Tags lcn verändert? Das Knotenpunktnetzwerk bezieht sich doch nur auf das Stadtgebiet Bielefeld, also ist es ein lokales Netzwerk, also lcn nicht rcn...
siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:network?uselang=de#Radverkehrsnetze

Gruß, John
segubi (2020-08-19 08:36:38+00:00): Nachdem in der Mailingliste owl diesbezüglich noch keine ganz definite Entscheidung gefallen war, habe ich entlang der Routen, die ich ergänzt habe, sukzessive die Knoten geändert, um sie im Rendering sehen zu können. Das ist aber nur temporär gemeint - natürlich muß das gesamte Knotenpunktnetzwerk Bielefeld einheitlich sein, und ich sehe es tatsächlich auch als lcn.
Sinnvollerweise müßte der Renderer für cycling.waymarkedtrails korrigiert werden. Da scheint auch eine Anfrage schon erfolgt zu sein.
Grüße, Sebastian
streckenkundler (2020-08-19 14:04:08+00:00): Hallo Zusammen,

Auch wenn ich da keine Gebietskenntnisse habe, möchte ich zum Thema Knotenpunktnetzwerke auch aufs Forum verweisen: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31239 Da ließt auch Peter Elderson mit, der maßgeblich das Tagging vorantreibt... Grundsätzlich sehe ich persönlich keine Notwendigkeit, bei Fahrradknotenpunktnetzwerken nach rcn und lcn zu unterscheiden, für mich ist solch ein Netzwer mit allen Elementen immer rcn. Das sieht man, wenn man dann mal zusammenhängende Netze betrachtet: https://experimental.knooppuntnet.nl/de/map/cycling.
Dann sei noch auf https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/networks/de/rcn verwiesen. Im Zweifelsfall mal im Forum meiden, warum euer Netz nicht angezeigt wird, oder Peter Elderson anschreiben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Peter%20Elderson

Sven
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:37:35+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:36:24+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:08:50+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 10:34:30+00:00): لماذا تم حذف العناصر التالية:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12rE
user_5239402 (2020-08-18 10:44:16+00:00): 제발 24시간 영업 같은 내용을 이름에 쓰지 마세요 그런건 지도의 가치가 없습니다
user_5239402 (2020-08-18 10:47:45+00:00): (매매)같은 내용을 쓰지 마세요 당신때문에 지도가 훼손됩니다
Frans S (2020-10-20 10:32:30+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:35:38+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:09:12+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
Andrea Musuruane (2020-08-29 08:06:25+00:00): Ciao, puoi commentare i changeset in italiano. Lo scopo è far capire ad altri mapper, in genere nelle tue vicinanze, cosa stai facendo. I changeset sono fatti per inserire più elementi insieme. Pertanto puoi fare il commit di più di una modifica per volta. Inoltre ti consiglio di non usare le immagini aeree di Bing perché non sono ben allineate. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Ciao, Andrea
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:34:15+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:33:46+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:33:24+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:32:16+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 05:09:32+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
aceman444 (2020-08-26 21:35:12+00:00): Hi, description of the changeset sounds totally nonsensical, but the tag changes themselves seem good, thank you.
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:31:07+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
abakus_uploader (2020-08-18 22:44:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:29:57+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
dieterdreist (2025-08-03 18:07:44+00:00): Kommen die multiplen motorroad Werte hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838172117/history/1#map=10/14.7742/74.2243&layers=N evtl. vom mergen von highways mit inkompatiblen Eigenschaften?
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:29:30+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
pyrog (2026-07-20 10:13:08+00:00): Hi,
Could you fix this traffic sign?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7822829935

Best regards
Tomas Straupis (2020-08-19 06:07:15+00:00): Grąžinau žiedui oneway=yes, nes *_link kelių interpretacijos (ar tai vienpusis, ar ne) skiriasi skirtinguose produktuose - todėl geriau aiškiai parašyti.
ygcgjp5 (2020-08-19 09:24:57+00:00): Keičiau ne dėl link, bet dėl junction=roundabout, nes pasak OSM wiki ši žyma ir taip numano oneway=yes. Ar tikrai jos reikia?
Tomas Straupis (2020-08-19 11:20:33+00:00): Na jas pradėjom dėlioti tada, kai kažkur užtikom, kad be oneway=yes softas nesusigaudo, kad čia vienpusis. Reikėtų iš naujo patikrinti visus taikymus: online routerius, OsmAnd, Garmin, jei visi gražiai važiuoja be oneway=yes - galima būtų nuimti...
Leo Slager (2020-08-18 15:07:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:29:03+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:28:41+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
user_2066394 (2020-08-18 14:07:49+00:00): building=yes und die Adresse gelöscht?
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:27:01+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:25:48+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
tastrax (2020-09-07 10:58:33+00:00): This POI looks to be in the wrong location to me. Could you check it please
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:24:13+00:00): Hi,
These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:23:50+00:00): Hi,
These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
ndm (2020-08-18 14:48:00+00:00): You are adding names based on BCC pinpoint which has large copyright ordnance survey attribution - how have you checked that your changes are compatible with open data and the obdl licence used by OpenStreetMap?
PRICEWECA (2020-08-18 14:54:28+00:00): I have called both the council and the highways authority to determine the actual recorded name of the road and cross referenced this with the data on pinpoint and locally held information including business records and council tax information.
ndm (2020-08-18 15:37:59+00:00): That’s great, but if they use Ordnance Survey data to get the names and that O/S data isn’t compatible with obdl then all your changes will have to be revoked.

If you check this at the start there may be less rework.
ndm (2020-08-18 15:43:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_OpenData
PRICEWECA (2020-08-19 07:23:48+00:00): So, just to clarify. You are disputing the editing of the name of a road that is 
1) obviously the name of a road;
2) published as a name of a road in several open data sources;
3) has been confirmed as the name of a road by BCC who are the highways authority for the area and whom have also confirmed that it is open data- as it is the name of a road?:
4) would be beneficial for people visiting both a hospital during a pandemic and to find bus stop to get to a supermarket as they could track to it?

On the ground of the ordnance survey data- which is not the data I have chosen to use. 

Additionally the name of this road has been complied in BODS which I access and maintain for the area.
ndm (2020-08-19 10:55:53+00:00): Yes.

You’re a new editor adding names to roads that don’t have signs - certainly the Clifton Down edit - and mentioning BCC pinpoint as a source which has copyright Ordnance Survey all over it. Or asking colleagues and not knowing how they got their data.

You can’t copy from other maps or data sources which aren’t compatible with obdl - whatever the circumstances. 

Plus weca has made some dubious edits around Bristol bridge that at least initially messed up a lot of routing for all motor vehicles - not just cars.

It’s great that you’re adding stuff to Osm but you need to follow the licensing and not use copyright data sources - or give the misleading impression that you might be doing so. I’ve had some of my edits questioned but I can always refer to an open data source, e.g. a photo I’ve taken.
PRICEWECA (2020-08-19 11:07:12+00:00): I am an old editor from Bristol with a new login to match my job change. I would appreciate it if you did not refer to the work done by other members without considering that I have also been trained to do this.

The highways agency, BCC, have confirmed that both of these edits are acceptable and are classified as open data. Considering that they, not OSM, hold  the responsibility for this I am at a loss as to why you are querying it. Also, as this data is on several open data platforms, including BODS, as previously mentioned, I have substantiated it with a source.
ndm (2020-08-19 11:20:52+00:00): Well I’m not trained - but I do check osm edits around Bristol - it might have been less contentious to link to Bristol open data website rather than mention bcc pinpoint. Glad to hear you’re an old editor - so I hope you and the other weca editors will be filling in the mapping commercially details on your profiles soon.

Have fun mapping.
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:23:09+00:00): Hi,
These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:19:39+00:00): Hi,
These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
Leo Slager (2020-08-18 15:18:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2020-08-18 15:20:48+00:00): Dag almah,
Lokaal op de eigen computer kun je natuurlijk van alles uitproberen, maar het is niet de bedoeling om zoiets te uploaden naar de server.
Alle wijzigingen komen direct op de kaart en zijn wereldwijd voor iedereen zichtbaar.
ik verwijder dit even.
Leo Slager (2020-08-18 15:23:10+00:00): reverted with my changeset 89583434 
Als je serieus verder wilt mappen, ben je natuurlijk van harte welkom.
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:19:13+00:00): Hi,
These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
Dodko (2022-05-21 14:07:47+00:00): Chodník pre chodcov sa značí značkou
highway=footway
a nie
name=Pedestrian passageway

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58990376/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
yadathot (2020-08-19 04:16:17+00:00): Hi,
These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
yadathot
RicoElectrico (2020-09-04 08:02:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2334516  - chyba już otwarta?
Olga | Yanosik (2020-09-04 10:58:40+00:00): Przejezdność jest jednak most nadal tymczasowy. Zmiany naniosłam.
Rainero (2020-08-19 21:52:20+00:00): Hallo DennisHeim,
woher stammen diese Adressen? Vor Ort existieren teils nicht mal die Häuser.
Viele Grüße,
Rainer
DennisHeim (2020-09-02 10:04:27+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
ich habe die Adressen aus einer Veröffentlichung der Stadt Landsham eingetragen. Da gab es auch noch mehr, ich wollte es aber nicht übertreiben.

Falls so etwas nicht gewünscht ist, dann gerne wieder löschen.

Beste Grüße,
Dennis
Rainero (2020-09-03 19:09:09+00:00): Hallo Dennis,
danke für die Rückmeldung. Wenn du einen Link zu den Adressen hast, wäre das mal interessant. 
Vor einigen Wochen gab es schon mal einen Edit hier, bei dem die Adressen aber aus dem Bayernatlas übernommen waren, der für OSM aus Lizenzgründen tabu ist.
Dein Edit hatte nun exakt denselben Inhalt, weshalb ich nachgefragt habe. 
Die meisten dieser Adressen existieren vor Ort (noch) nicht, weshalb ich den Änderungssatz zurückgesetzt habe, aber den jetzigen Status im Neubaugebiet eingezeichnet habe und auch die Handvoll tatsächlich ausgeschilderte Adressen.
Viele Grüße,
Rainer
josmougn (2020-09-13 15:52:57+00:00): salut Jean-Marc
quand tu contribues regarde s'il n'y a pas une note à fermer en même temps. C'était le cas du P vélo La Hacquinière. Finalement qu'elle soit restée ouverte m'a permis de voir que tu as oublié d'indiquer le nombre de places. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1990459
A +, José
kapazao (2020-08-19 06:51:28+00:00): Hola, ¿el asadero ha sido sustituido por la clínica dental?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89575832
Wynndale (2020-08-19 06:23:38+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and have a good time mapping. Is the local authority map out of copyright, or has it got a licence we can use without breach of copyright? Also, you mapped the name extending into Richmond Park, is that intended?
IbnMusa (2020-08-20 21:43:13+00:00): Not sure - it's used on the "You are here" -style maps physically located at the entrances to the Common. And it should end at the gate - will sort that out.
tastrax (2020-09-09 00:07:48+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
DD1GJ (2020-08-18 22:13:15+00:00): Hallo, was willst Du mit dier Änderung erreichen?

 Die Gebäude in Solingen wurden anhand amtlicher Unterlagen perfekt eingeeichnet. Der Knoten des Imbiß liegt jetzt außerhalb des Gbäudes. Das Gebäude hat jetzt einen völlig unnötigen Namen und eine falsche Gebäudehöhe.
Parzelle13 (2020-08-19 07:54:31+00:00): Etwas sinnvollere Kommentare wären auch nicht schlecht.
johndoe (2020-08-19 00:31:37+00:00): Hallo,
Du bist gerade dabei, bestehende Busrouten grundlegend zu zerstören !!!
Eine Busrouten-Relation hat einen bestimmten Aufbau, den Du unbedingt einhalten mußt !!!
Im Übrigen ist iD nicht dazu geeignet, Relationen zu bearbeiten !

Gruß
johndoe
Leo Slager (2020-08-18 23:47:12+00:00): Beste Jonrellim,
De editor iD is volkomen ongeschikt om routerelaties te bewerken.
Alle nieuwe wegen die je invoegt, worden achter aan de route geplakt.
Het resultaat is dus een route die op meerdere plaatsen onderbroken is.
De 4 routes van bus 61 en 64 repareren heeft mij circa drie kwartier gekost.
Als je serieus met routerelaties aan de slag wilt, dan wil ik  je dringen adviseren om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM.
Of vraag hulp aan een ervaren mapper voor dit soort wijzigingen.
jonrellim (2020-08-19 01:05:21+00:00): dat was mij niet bekend, ik kopieerde enkel wat ik zag bij de al bestaande route relaties van de buslijn. ik zal dit voortaan aan anderen over laten.
habi (2020-08-18 13:39:02+00:00): As per the instuctions on the task:

- Please accurately outline all the buildings you can find. The outline should be for the full size of the building even if it is partly covered by trees in the imagery.
- After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners.

Please only add non-squared buildings if they really are of skewed shape in the imagery, otherwise please frequently use the Q key in the editor.

Have a good day!
Badojo (2020-08-18 15:55:34+00:00): Pozdrav,
prema svim važećim zakonima i statutima Đurđenovac nije grad pa tako i na OSM-u ne bi trebao biti označen kao grad. Istina je da nije tipično ruralno selo, ali je činjenica da nema status gradskog naselja
Xariuss (2020-08-18 19:23:30+00:00): Pozdrav,
engleska imenica 'town' ne označava grad ('city'). 'Town' je veće lokalno središte, obično s urbanim elementima. U hrvatskom jeziku bi definicijom najviše odgovarao općinskom središtu.
'Village' (selo) je manje naselje s dominantno ruralnim elementima i stanovništvom zaposlenim u primarnom sektoru. 'Hamlet' je zaseok, manje selo.

Na karti je jasno istaknuto da se radi o administrativnom tipu općine, ali prema tipu naselja i definiciji u engleskom jeziku, Đurđenovac nije 'village' (selo).

Ne treba, stoga, miješati englesku nomenklaturu za TIP NASELJA s hrvatskom nomenklaturom za TIP JEDINICE LOKALNE SAMOUPRAVE. Ovdje se nedvojbeno radi o kategorizaciju po ključu tipa NASELJA.

Lp
Badojo (2020-08-18 19:32:50+00:00): To nema veze, na službenoj hrvatskoj OSM Wikipediji nalaze se pravila o određivanju tipa naselja. Pošto je Đurđenovac naselje sa ispod 100.000 stanovnika i nema status grada ispravno ga je označiti sa place=village
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hr:Kreiranje_gradova_sela#Dodavanje_i_ozna.C4.8Davanje_gradova_i_mjesta_na_karti)
Badojo (2020-08-18 19:39:02+00:00): To što je Đurđenovac u pravom životu možda gradić ne znači da se na OSM-u ne može označavati sa 'village' pošto 'village' ne znači da je selo nego znači da nije gradsko naselje.
mariotomo (2020-11-04 15:04:34+00:00): "ab Emelia" es el nombre así como está en la portada, o la abreviación/simplificación que le pusiste.  y si es una abreviación, quién lo va a mejorar?
mariotomo (2020-11-04 15:04:14+00:00): "Mdto Anita" es el nombre así como está en la portada, o la abreviación/simplificación que le pusiste.  y si es una abreviación, quién lo va a mejorar?
Alexey Lukin (2020-09-06 18:32:21+00:00): Dear mapper,
In your edits of railway tracks near North Station, you've incorrectly applied a tag "covered", which results in rendering of on-surface railways as tunnels. Also, the tunnels of Green Line have slightly departed from their geographically accurate locations. Would you like to fix these issues or let me do it?
Alexey Lukin (2020-09-06 20:26:58+00:00): I went ahead and corrected the alignment of Green Line tunnels as well as the "covered" tag of commuter rail and platforms. Note that "covered" means "under the building", not "has a canopy".
iD-w (2020-09-11 03:24:31+00:00): Got it, thanks! I wasn't sure if it was common practice to split up "area"-type transit platforms like those into 2 separate "areas" (1 covered, 1 uncovered) and then have both of them added into the relation. In any case, I was at the waiting area a few days ago and discovered that the tracks indeed extend much further (i.e., southeast-bound) into the building than I first thought, so I will take a stab at re-positioning the Level-0 tracks, rooms & corridors more accurately (and keeping the Green/Orange rails as-is).