piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2022-04-24 16:17:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.

Please write change comments describing what you changed.
Jarek 🚲 (2022-05-01 19:05:23+00:00): Hello,

Please do not add points without local knowledge and/or in-person survey. You added Bobacha in wrong location, at a time when it was not yet open. It soft-opened yesterday at 1660 Queen W. I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120432576
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-01 23:03:24+00:00): @PopeyePopcord what was your source for this edit?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:47:31+00:00): Local knowledge
SomeoneElse (2022-05-02 22:03:31+00:00): Local knowledge over what timescale?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 22:17:37+00:00): about a week ago
Jarek 🚲 (2022-05-03 00:14:24+00:00): ah if you're a local we should hang out sometime!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_3022894 (2022-04-27 18:14:09+00:00): Hi Streetview247,
darf ich dir einen  kleinen Hinweis geben? Die Bahnsteige in Solingen Hauptbahnhof sind ja gemappt, mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054256925 hast du ein linienförmiges Duplikat erzeugt, welches so nicht erforderlich ist. Ich weiß nicht, ob dir diese Art des Mapping eventuell irgendwo anders begegnet ist und du eventuell deshalb darauf gekommen bist das so zu machen?

Wie gesagt die Bahnsteige in Solingen Hbf sind ja gemappt, nur eben als Fläche statt als Linie, was auch völlig okay ist.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
user_3022894 (2022-07-06 08:10:51+00:00): Die Außenlinie von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228210055 brauchst du ebenfalls nicht extra als Bahnsteig mappen, da bereits ein Multipolygon existiert.

Zugegeben ist das Ganze natürlich nicht so easy zu durchschauen so einfach auf den ersten Blick, aber wie gesagt, es bedurfte hier absolut keiner Änderungen.
streckenkundler (2022-04-23 19:17:59+00:00): Sag mal, wann begreifst du die Zeilen der Sperrung deiner vorherigen Inkanation:

[Zitat]     Hallo,

    leider hast Du Dir die kurzzeitige Sperre in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5897 nicht zu Herzen genommen und in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119920384 wieder “F-Land” in OpenStreetMap eingetragen.

    Bitte respektiere, dass für “F-Land” in OSM kein Platz ist.

    Viele Grüße
    Frederik Ramm
    OSMF Data Working Group
    Ticket#2022041010000075
[/zitat]
user_15630563 (2022-04-23 19:21:50+00:00): Haben Sie hier nicht mitgelesen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120020885
streckenkundler (2022-04-23 19:32:17+00:00): Du hast dich spätestens jetzt selbst verraten! Am Tage deiner 7-tägigen Sperrung deines vorherigen Accounts https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5922 hast du dich neu registriert und munter weiter gemacht.  Gerade das trägt vor allem in dieser Situation nicht zu einer sinnvollen und vertrauensbildenden OSM-Arbeit bei. Im Gegenteil. Leider! :(

Auch jetzt noch mal:  Lass diese Fake-Land-Geschichte sein!
user_15630563 (2022-04-23 19:36:38+00:00): Also, wie gesagt, ich kenne diesen Naturaufnahmen nicht und weiß auch nichts von einer Sperre. 
Ich habe von F-Land nur mitbekommen und dachte es wäre eben eine gute Idee das hier auf dieser Karte hinzuzufügen.
Auch bei dem vorhin geschriebenen Link von mir wurde ja von anderen mitgeteilt das ich das eben als leisure=garden markieren soll.  - Habe ich gemacht.
CurlingMan13 (2022-04-24 09:42:29+00:00): Can you elaborate on what was done?  Putting "xx" is not really appropriate for changeset comments and doesn't really help when trying to figure out what you did or why.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
village (2022-05-22 12:30:59+00:00): Du hast beim "umtaggen" von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8267228311 'parcel_pickup=yes' vergessen. Ich hoffe, nur an dieser Stelle. Hab's mal nachgetragen: https://osm.org/changeset/121316059
SomeoneElse (2022-04-23 23:58:39+00:00): Sorry it's another world-spanning changeset.  These changes were genuinely worldwide.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user4816003805 (2022-04-27 19:59:04+00:00): I wouldn't necessarily delete address nodes, even if they duplicate information contained in the building.
Sometimes it makes it easier to tell the relative location of different entrances.
Using separate address nodes also allows you to tag individual features with values like "wheelchair=no".

Some places use separate address nodes, some just tie it to the building. AFAICT, there's no hard rule one way or the other.
SekeRob (2022-05-03 09:45:50+00:00): Repaired turn rule you broke. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120103110
SekeRob (2022-05-03 09:47:54+00:00): The correct link to the change is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120492867
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
silversurfer83 (2022-04-24 15:20:38+00:00): Hi, ich sehe, du scheinst recht neu zu sein und hast erste Änderungen gemacht. Ich kann aus dieser Änderung jetzt nicht erkennen, was genau du da in die Datenbank eingetragen hast. Soll es eine Bank sein? Oder möchtest du eine Fläche als Park kennzeichnen?
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120103749
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Yuxian (2022-04-25 13:01:20+00:00): Hi Teek,

Some of your recent edits have features that are already tagged on the map. The wind turbines that you added here, were already mapped before.
Don't forget to check whether something is already on the map, or merge your new features with the existing ones.

Have a nice day!
Yuxian
Lyon-St-Clair (2022-04-25 08:09:52+00:00): Please, read this text on Legilux, Rue Ermesinde and Rue du Charly are now N10 parts : https://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2021/12/15/a878/jo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
CurlingMan13 (2022-04-24 09:31:43+00:00): If possible, please upload the changes before moving onto a new geographic area.
gscholz (2022-04-27 04:33:35+00:00): Hi Awo,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-73.25027&lat=-39.80934&zoom=18

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120104498

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-23 21:40:12+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado etiquetas como Altura, Equipamiento, Tipo, las cuales no son etiquetas que utilicemos en OSM. Por lo que las he retirado, por favor revise la documentación sobre edificios en la wiki [0] [1] Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla en el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad peruana.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels
Saludos
ovruni (2022-04-24 07:48:01+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado por diferentes zonas de Lima ediciones similares a la suya, lo que sugiere que existe en curso un conjunto de ediciones organizadas sin seguir las directrices de edición organizada. [0] Por favor comunique a la persona u organización encargada para que se ponga en contacto mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
VictorIE (2023-04-04 13:58:15+00:00): Hi,

Confused house numbers on this terrace: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054283181
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Sirius T Bontea (2023-02-22 22:05:31+00:00): Refinement of map vectors using updated aerial photography of completed roundabout from:

https://msdis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=5490021931814fd9a64ba6f1468fa9f0
ovruni (2022-04-23 22:06:30+00:00): Hola Silviopalomino, le he escrito anteriormente sobre los textos en conjunto de cambios y sobre el retiro de la etiqueta de mercado, pero parece que ha vuelto a suceder en este conjunto de cambios, por lo que lo he revertido.
Saludos
Vladislav Konoplev (2022-04-27 10:22:11+00:00): Hi! May I know on the basis of what reliable sources did you map this relation?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120106089
🇨🇿 Roman Horník (2022-04-27 17:22:51+00:00): Hi, I have mapped these objects based on much more reliable, accurate and up-to-date data than that offered by, for example, RÚIAN for buildings. I have verified the reliability and accuracy of the source several times, for example by comparing it with a cadastral map. I usually edit only the geometry of objects, not their attributes. Is the geometry of the mentioned objects in disarray?
aceman444 (2024-10-21 20:37:27+00:00): A aky je to teda zdroj, ked nie RUIAN ani kataster? Mali by ste ho uvadzat na kazdej sade zmien.
martien-176 (2022-04-24 15:56:38+00:00): Hi Nabillad, you requested a review of your mappings. The buildings look good, corners are square and the footprints are well traced.One remark: you deleted a few buildings and retraced new ones in place of them. It would be better to move these old buildings to the right spot. Deleting features should if possible be avoided.  Thanks and please keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120106267
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-24 07:47:31+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado por diferentes zonas de Lima ediciones similares a la suya, lo que sugiere que existe en curso un conjunto de ediciones organizadas sin seguir las directrices de edición organizada. [0] Por favor comunique a la persona u organización encargada para que se ponga en contacto mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
MxxCon (2022-04-24 04:24:24+00:00): Hello.
What kind of business is this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120106801
Blest 1 (2022-04-24 04:53:48+00:00): It is an archery range and pro shop.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120106801
drivec (2022-05-11 02:49:42+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.