piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wandelloeffel (2018-02-22 08:10:51+00:00): Hallo,
großartig, dass hier mal der 'disused'-Tag verwendet wird, weil das Kellemann-Cafè mal eine Apotheke gewesen ist. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/959704845)
Die URL, die für die Apotheke angegeben ist, hat allerdings nichts mit dieser Apotheke zu tun. Sie führt zur Website einer (eher zweifelhaten) Versandapotheke in der Schweiz. Ich lösche sie daher mal aus den Angaben.
user_5359 (2018-02-07 18:30:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I reverted your change set.
Jason Harrison (2018-02-10 00:25:58+00:00): Edit is bad

Please see the above comment.  OpenStreetMap welcomes additions/edits of features that exist in real life.  

Consider reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers 

---

#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA 

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56155913
user_5359 (2018-02-07 18:18:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards /debit_cards.
For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
andrewwiseman (2019-07-12 19:19:27+00:00): Thanks for mapping - make sure to zoom in though, that road already existed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
cadsauxk (2018-02-24 19:58:34+00:00): Oi Heliton

a Rua Euler virou inteira de mão única? Segundo a BHTRans é entre Riachuelo e Itororó.

http://www.bhtrans.pbh.gov.br/portal/page/portal/portalpublico/Temas/Noticias/BHTRANS-implanta-4%C2%AA-e-ultima-etapa-de-melhorias-na-regiao-d

você pode confirmar isto por favor?

origado
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
user_5359 (2018-02-07 19:24:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of your node! I can't see any building nearby the node.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
maraf24 (2018-02-09 21:36:56+00:00): Poprawnie: Józefa Kojzara
Skąd wziąłeś tego księdza i Ludwika?
http://www.rowien-folwarki.zory.pl/dzielnica/znani-z-dzielnicy/jozef-kojzar-1876-1967/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
user_5359 (2018-02-07 19:28:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! We draw a river as line. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway and follows the links to the detail pages. 
I assumed you mean waterway=riverbank.
Mohsin Islam (2018-12-03 06:30:55+00:00): Hello @Xish Xehman Bangladesh 
thanks a lot for your contribution ...but i don't know this ,your contribution not continues
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:18:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:18:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
geoaria (2018-02-11 10:30:32+00:00): در هنگام ترسیم مسیر ها به اتصال آنها به مسیر اصلی  دقت کنید تا یک مسیر به اصطلاح جزیره شکل نگیرد. خطای شما توسط osmi‌پیگیری و رفع گردید
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:18:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
viloan (2018-02-07 18:47:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-02-07 18:48:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
geri-oc (2018-02-08 07:37:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358658685
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358658643
Bitte kontrollieren: building-house=yes ist falsch.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29022581
Diese Fläche kann raus, da schon die gesamte Fläche als Ackerland als Multipolgon vorliegt. Eventuell auch bei Flächen darauf achten, ob eine Straße über ein Feld geht oder nicht doch besser rechts und links der Straße endet.

Gruß Gerd
etron770 (2018-02-08 08:21:39+00:00): Die Fläche war schon drin, die Gebäude waren noch nicht vorhanden. Ab wann wird ein Teil als Siedlungsfläche gekennzeichnet? Nur Orte oder auch Aussiedlerhöfe bzw Einzelhäuser?
viele Grüße Knut
p.s Danke für die Hilfe - sage bitte gleich  wenn ich dich zu viel Frage
etron770 (2018-02-08 08:27:15+00:00): "Building-house" und Wert  "yes" wird mir aber mit JOSM zur Auswahl angezeigt. Was sollte Deiner Meinung nach dort stehen?
geri-oc (2018-02-08 08:30:32+00:00): Di Fläche dann löschen, weil jetz Ackerüber Acher liegt - siehst du auch an der dunkleren Färbung.
Hallo Knut,
was eine Wohnfläche ist, kannst du als landuse=residential eintragen. Sollte es ein Bauernhof sein dann *=farmyard. Da du JOSM verwendest, kannst du unter Vorlagen -> Vorlagen suchen nutzen. Meist kommt dann schon das passende.  

Vielleicht schreibst du bei Fragen ein PN - dann lassen sich Fragen detailiert durch dazwischenschreiben beantworten. Du kannst auch das Forum nutzen.
Gruß Gerd
geri-oc (2018-02-08 08:48:00+00:00): building-house wird deswegen angezeigt, weil du es schon einmal verwendest hast. Zeichne einen Umriss und gehe einmal auf Vorlage -> Vorlage suchen -> Building - dann werden dir viele Möglichkeiten angeboten - z. B. Neue WIKI-Tags - Gebäude

Wenn du building als Wert eingibts wird dir in engl. vieles unter dem dropdown Pfeil angezeigt, leider auch was du einmal falsch geschrieben hast. Am besten ist es auf den Wert (building) rechts unter Merkmalen klickst und F! drückst, dann kommst du zu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building

Empfehlenswert:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:JOSM/Guide

oder

http://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf

PS: Mit STRG+F öffnet sich (auch im Wiki) ein Fenster, wo du deinen Suchbegriff eintragen kannst.
geri-oc (2018-02-08 07:19:48+00:00): building=*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Geb%C3%A4ude

Wenn es ein Einfamilienhaus ist: building=house
(building-house=yes raus)
mueschel (2018-02-09 09:38:26+00:00): Hi,
this import seems to have gone wrong. 3600 buildings have many foreign tags which shouldn't appear in the OSM database like these:
Corp=Bardolph
LandUse_Ty=Residential
OBJECTID=13974
Shape_Area=2750.87390396
Shape_Leng=283.434877206
Tall=No
Township=Macomb Township

Could you fix this? Second, can you point me to the Wiki page documenting this import?

Jan
wiuhighwayman (2018-02-09 16:19:27+00:00): Hi Jan,
I figured out the issue -- I imported a shapefile in JOSM and didn't clean out the fields, which came in as these extraneous tags. I have fixed this issue (deleted and recreated) and will update the other uploads that have the same problem. Thanks for catching the issue.
Chris
chachafish (2018-02-26 02:51:14+00:00): Greetings. I'm no expert on imports and please correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you required to create a dedicated user account for an import? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
wiuhighwayman_import (2018-02-26 03:33:47+00:00): Yes, thank you chachafish. Meant to do that and then spaced it until your comment arrived. Using the dedicated account now.
chachafish (2018-02-26 03:50:07+00:00): Cheers! :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-02-08 11:51:31+00:00): I am curious, how you used Bing and Esri aerial images to verify that it is used as place of worship?
Cascafico (2018-02-14 09:56:45+00:00): Bella notizia! Credo qualcuno abbia già aggiunto la cycleway... è permesso pèassare anche a piedi?
Constable (2018-02-07 20:18:25+00:00): ciao, guarda però che questo non è tutto un edificio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88700934
Per favore cambia il tag in landuse=* oppure ricalca bene l'edificio
Grazie
osm_fede (2018-02-08 09:03:00+00:00): Ho solo cambiato il tag in "edificio industriale", in effetti ho visto che era meglio usare landuse.
Provvedo a ricalcare l'edificio effettivo.
Constable (2018-02-08 09:18:23+00:00): Grazie!
demon_box (2018-03-18 17:22:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88301614

hai cambiato da building=yes a building=hotel ed è perfetto ma non ho capito perchè hai eliminato tourism=hotel, questo deve rimanere, grazie
osm_fede (2018-03-19 12:42:16+00:00): non me ne sono accorto, grazie
mariotomo (2021-05-04 15:37:42+00:00): hola. sigues interesado en OSM? quieres apoyo para mejorar tus prácticas?
muralito (2018-02-09 01:08:02+00:00): Hola Jade, creo que borrar nodos de direccion para ponerlos en un poligono de un comercio no es conveniente. A primera puede parecer inofensivo o hasta bueno, pero luego colaboradores con poca experiencia ven que cierra un comercio y borran todos los datos, incluyendo la direccion que se perderia.

Saludos,
M.
JadeHeart (2018-02-10 00:04:03+00:00): Hola Muralito, 

Tiene razón. Creo que seria mejor si la dirección y el polígono del POI son separados. Voy a hacer estos cambios. 

Gracias
Myazyk (2018-02-07 19:50:30+00:00): Рекомендую долучити до меж села присілок Сіде у південній частині та інші окремі хати
avm (2018-02-07 22:06:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56162733 where the changeset comment is: Revert non-existent parks (greenfield, gardens, etc) - Pokemon?
avm (2018-02-07 22:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56162726 where the changeset comment is: Revert non-existent parks (greenfield, gardens, etc) - Pokemon?
avm (2018-02-07 22:06:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56162719 where the changeset comment is: Revert non-existent parks (greenfield, gardens, etc) - Pokemon?
avm (2018-02-07 22:05:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56162713 where the changeset comment is: Revert non-existent parks (greenfield, gardens, etc) - Pokemon?
mueschel (2018-02-09 09:36:19+00:00): Hi,
this changeset contains many ways which do not have any actual OSM-related tag and seem to be imported from some external source.
E.g. this http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/559523299
Could you explain the meaning and state what the source is?

Jan
naoliv (2018-02-09 21:00:20+00:00): Francysko, talvez você estava usando a camada de faces para nomear as ruas e enviou sem querer esses objetos?
FrancyskoMarkes (2018-02-10 18:04:36+00:00): Bom, eu utilizei esta camada de faces que foi disponiblizada no grupo do OSM Brasil. Pois esta cidade Chaval, não contém a camada de setores urbanos do IBGE. Mas caso esteja incorreta ou não de acordo, peço que me corrijam e desfaçam essa edição.
FrancyskoMarkes (2018-02-10 18:06:54+00:00): Poxa me desculpem. A camada faces foi junto.
mueschel (2018-02-11 14:02:50+00:00): Alright, I removed those lines in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56264248

Jan
FrancyskoMarkes (2018-02-12 12:58:22+00:00): Obrigado por corrigir esse erro. Prestarei mais atenção na próxima edição.
user_5359 (2018-02-07 19:52:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A stream, who is flow in a circle?? Did you mean natural=water, water=lake? Please read the wiki on wiki.osm.org.
user_5359 (2018-02-08 05:34:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. And we use the key landuse for great objects as one property.
Commodoortje (2018-02-09 11:48:45+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61284
DD1GJ (2018-02-07 22:57:38+00:00): Revert 56159241, Pokémon-Vandalismus, Friedhof noch in Betrieb
DD1GJ (2018-02-07 22:58:14+00:00): http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:15:18+00:00): Hi juanpoke10, welcome to OSM.

Please only map what's on the ground. Don't add fictive map data, that's #vandalism ! Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56159258
abakus_uploader (2018-02-07 23:31:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
JayTurnr (2018-02-20 01:23:08+00:00): I assume Naptan import data is important?
Mike Baggaley (2018-02-20 07:41:21+00:00): Hi Jay, NaPTAN data is an import of public transport data from https://data.gov.uk/dataset/naptan and should be on a node at the position of the bus stop. Not sure how the data ended up on this way.

Regards,
Mike
multimodaal (2018-11-24 15:03:24+00:00): Dit is een schadelijke undiscussed mechanical edit op meer dan 1.700 ways. In strijd met https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Hierbij is data verloren is gegaan en zijn wegen die in het echt toegankelijk zijn (en waren in OSM) dat nu niet meer zijn na verwijderen foot=yes (bijvoorbeeld in combinatie met access=no of access=private). 

Graag herstel. Zie verder 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56160591#map=9/52.5780/5.1031

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-02-27 18:05:54+00:00): Note cases like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266904074/history

Removing foot=yes where access tag is presents results in damage of data.

It is a pity that this edit was not reverted sooner.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-02-27 18:17:03+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67626563 (hopefully no new damage was caused) in accordance to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
alphensebezorger (2019-10-06 10:14:10+00:00): Hallo Martin,
Ik kwam toevallig dit voetpad tegen waar nu volgens OSM niemand gebruik van mag maken: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519021183/history.
Zo te zien is er in deze changeset iets misgegaan waardoor de ooit nutteloze tag access=no nu ongewenste gevolgen heeft. Kun jij proberen te achterhalen of er meer van dit soort gevallen zijn, en deze voetpaden op OSM weer openstellen voor publiek?

Bedankt, Alphensebezorger.
Martin Borsje (2019-10-06 10:24:47+00:00): Hoi

Bedankt voor je opmerking

Op een toegankelijk voetpad behoort natuurlijk niet access=no te staan!

In het verleden hebben enkelen highways gemapt door te starten met bijvoorbeeld access=no (dan zet je de weg voor iedereen op slot), dan highway=footway (maar is dan nog steeds afgesloten voor iedereen dus ook voetgangers) en dan foot=yes.

Dit moet dus getagd worden als highway=footway (een tag nodig dus)

Ik heb dit in een aantal gevallen hersteld en mogelijk hier vergeten de access=no eraf te halen. Ik heb dat nu gecorrigeerd. In voorkomende gevallen kun je dat natuurlijk ook zelf doen.

Martin
alphensebezorger (2019-10-06 10:34:44+00:00): Bedankt voor het herstellen van dit geval. 
Ik hoopte eigenlijk dat jij een handige manier kon verzinnen om de andere voetpaden uit deze changeset te controleren op vergelijkbare problemen. Kan dat misschien met JOSM, of anders overpass?

(Als het me alleen om dit voetpad was gegaan, had ik het inderdaad zelf hersteld en hier geen reactie ingetypt.)
Alphensebezorger
multimodaal (2018-11-24 15:03:54+00:00): Dit is een schadelijke undiscussed mechanical edit op meer dan 800 ways. In strijd met https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Hierbij is data verloren is gegaan 
Graag herstel. Zie verder 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56160591#map=9/52.5780/5.1031

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
user_5359 (2018-02-08 05:32:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please search on page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for the best description of your shop.
multimodaal (2018-11-24 14:49:38+00:00): Dit is een schadelijke undiscussed mechanical edit op meer dan 1.800 ways. In strijd met https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct 
Hierbij is data verloren is gegaan en zijn wegen die in het echt toegankelijk zijn (en waren in OSM)  dat nu niet meer zijn na verwijderen foot=yes (bijvoorbeeld in combinatie met access=no of access=private). 

Voor zover waarde van foot in tussentijd niet is teruggeplaatst of verbeterd (permissive ipv yes), is deze changeset teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64845766

Zie bijvoorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88010524/history ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508371523/history ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376836104/history

Ook is in andere gevallen informatie over rechtsgrond van openstelling zonder lokale kennis verwijderd; foot=yes beoogt immers aan te geven dat een pad openbaar is, in tegenstelling andere waarden zoals foot=permissive of foot=customers.    

Dit blijkt bovendien niet de enige vergelijkbare grootschalige schadelijke edit, zie bijvoorbeeld ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56160165 
(ca 1.750 wegen ) en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56160412 
(ca 850 wegen)

Graag herstel van de gesloopte tags in bovenstaande en overige wijzigingen, dank alvast. 

Zie verder https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64585
Martin Borsje (2018-11-24 15:10:09+00:00): Mea culpa, maar een changeset reverse van 10 maanden geleden zal niet eenvoudig meer gaan....
Martin Borsje (2018-11-24 15:11:22+00:00): Een foot=yes op footway is echt dubbelop.
Martin Borsje (2018-11-24 15:12:58+00:00): En je zegt dat je de changeset hebt teruggedraaid, dus een heilloze zaak lijkt me zo...
multimodaal (2018-11-25 12:28:24+00:00): 1: zoals uitgelegd volgt foot=yes in OSM niet _per definitie_ uit footway, is dus (helaas!) niet dubbelop. Footway is immers NIET gedefinieerd als "only for ways the public where official, legally-enshrined right of access" (OSM-definitie van "yes"íin teremen van access). Een footway kan ook access=permissive hebben.

Zie oa ook   https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=727116#p727116 en eerdere discussie daar.

2. Revert is wel mogelijk na deze tijd als je handmatig tags op de betreffende wegen terugplaatst, na eerst de wegen te hebben uitgesloten die in de tussentijd al wel weer een waarde voor foot=* gekregen 

3. Ik heb alleen deze changeset (56160591) teruggedraaid en dan alleen voor het foot=yes betreft in die gevallen waar dat niet in de tussentijd is verbeterd.

Het verzoek ziet op de overige, nog niet herstelde tags en met name op de overige gelijksoortige changesets, waarvan ik er toevallig twee ben tegengekomen, maar ik weet niet hoeveel meer er nog zijn. 

Als je dat niet zelf kan doen, dan zou ik het waarderen als je een link naar de changesets plaatst in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64585

Daar zal ik ook verder inhoudelijk reageren.