piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
lutz (2022-10-01 07:32:47+00:00): Ich habe noch nie einen Reverter verwendet, 
meine Änderungen sind alle mit der Hand gemacht, 
und jedes Objekt wurde überprüft.

Übrigens habe ich den 'Eigentümer' in diesem Änderungssatz 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125086307

kontaktiert, und es wurde trotzdem weiter gelöscht!

Seltsam finde ich, das bei einer Challenge, wo Anwender mit Punkten "belohnt" werden, 
nicht besser Recherchiert wird, ob die Wiki-Aussagen tatsächlich zutreffen, 
hier wurde einfach blind umgemappt.

Grüße von Lutz

I have never used a reverter, 
my changes are all made by hand, 
and every object has been checked.

By the way, I have the 'owner' in this change set 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125086307

contacted, and it was still deleted!

I find it strange that in a challenge where users are 'rewarded' with points, 
it is not better researched whether the wiki statements are actually true, 
here was simply blindly mashed over.

Greetings from Lutz
antonr (2023-03-15 12:38:15+00:00): Udfra (gamle) Mapillary-billeder ligner dette i høj grad en highway=footway, ikke en service: Jeg kan se både cykling-forbudt-skilt og en pullert (barrier=bollard) på https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2893740040872742. Midt på, hvor der krydses en lille have/park, bliver det endda til en grus-sti.

Jeg vil overlade til dig at rette, hvis du har opdateret lokalkendskab.

Mvh
antonr (2023-03-20 17:07:09+00:00): Jeg har rettet.
eggie (2022-09-17 09:17:37+00:00): Hoi.. je vraagt om een review..
Wanneer er staat aangegeven dat het een privegebeuren is dan access=private.. Staat er niets dan dat weglaten.
..foot=permissive is oke.. 
Dat zal altijd routeren.. 
Wanneer access=private wordt getagd is bicycle=no overbodig.
Mvg
Eggie
Dodko (2022-09-17 11:32:31+00:00): Nepridávaj značku amenity=place_of_worship kým si o nej neprečítaš načo slúži
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
tu je napísané čo sa používa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126208512
Dodko (2022-09-17 11:32:03+00:00): Nepridávaj značku amenity=place_of_worship kým si o nej neprečítaš načo slúži
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
tu je napísané čo sa používa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126208512
Mammi71 (2022-09-26 07:46:58+00:00): Hallo migath,
ich hatte Dir zu Deiner Frage, passend zu dieser Änderung, im Forum noch eine Antwort/Nachricht hinterlassen:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/im-sommer-rasenflache-im-winter-eisweiher-wie-mappen/2708/4?u=mammi71
Vielleicht kannst Du Dir. das noch einmal. ansehen.
Langlaeufer (2022-09-26 19:03:43+00:00): water=stream ist auch unpassend
Stream heißt Bach.
Langlaeufer (2022-09-26 19:06:23+00:00): ich würde water=pond (Teich) vorschlagen
Mammi71 (2022-09-27 06:08:41+00:00): Die Frage ist doch: wird die Fläche nur für das Eislaufen geflutet oder dient sie auch zu anderen Jahreszeiten als Regen- bzw. Hochwasserrückhaltebecken. Dann wäre landuse=basin die bessere Wahl.
maciek-szn (2022-09-17 09:06:45+00:00): Ta zmiana została wycofana. Budynek posiadał już prawidłowy adres.
Proszę również o wprowadzanie prawidłowego opisu zestawu zmian. Kropka nie jest prawidłowym opisem.
maciek-szn (2022-09-17 09:04:59+00:00): Ta zmiana została wycofana. Po pierwsze tory tramwajowe przerobiłeś na drogę. Po drugie tag „construction” oznacza, że droga jest w budowie. Ta droga nie może być w budowie, skoro nawet nie został rozstrzygnięty przetarg na jej budowę. Prawidłowy tag to „proposed”, ale akurat planowana droga jest tam od lat naniesiona.
Proszę również o wprowadzanie prawidłowego opisu zestawu zmian. Kropka nie jest prawidłowym opisem.
maciek-szn (2022-09-17 09:04:28+00:00): Ta zmiana została wycofana. Tag „construction” oznacza, że droga jest w budowie. Ta droga nie może być w budowie, skoro nawet nie został rozstrzygnięty przetarg na jej budowę. Prawidłowy tag to „proposed”, ale akurat planowana droga jest tam od lat naniesiona.
Proszę również o wprowadzanie prawidłowego opisu zestawu zmian. Kropka nie jest prawidłowym opisem.
LySioS (2024-02-13 21:29:25+00:00): bonjour Lejun,

Je tombe sur quelques adresses que tu as rajoutées sur Canet, j'ai l'impression que tu les as intégrées à l'aveugle (points mal placés, points incohérents). il faut vraiment prendre le temps de faire les choses bien, surtout qu'ici il n'y a pas encore de base adresse certifiée. C'est du temps gagné sur le jardinage derrière.
Merci
Lejun (2024-02-15 17:36:02+00:00): « À l'aveugle » oui et non, j'ai simplement fait une intégration à partir des données FANTOIR. Donc après oui, y a sûrement des limites à la qualité des données par rapport à un relevé terrain propre
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-03 07:11:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10031047141/history has shop = استیل that was added in this edit
shop=استیل ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
Anon-4 (2022-09-17 08:13:11+00:00): La revisión es necesaria ya que no tengo certeza absoluta de si todas las calles que he marcado como peatonales lo son. Estoy bastante seguro, pero tendría que comprobarlo.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:03:47+00:00): These are not tents. There are buildings for special ceremonies that are held for 2 weeks a year. These buildings are constantly for this purpose and have specific names and uses. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:27:41+00:00): @ChehrehBargi You shall not add a descriptive name on object. The specific tag is enough to explain what this is. read here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#:~:text=Do%20not%20use%20name%3D*%20if%3A            
You can not add name=toilet on objects. there is tags for such things.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:41:25+00:00): I have added everything that was written on the board there. Descriptive name not added. For example, I have written toilet 1. This was the title of the toilet that had a number.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:45:45+00:00): read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#:~:text=Do%20not%20use%20name%3D*%20if%3A
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 06:06:02+00:00): It is also said here that we must record what is written on the board. So my registration is still correct.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:36:52+00:00): No, you should add regular names that are not descriptive, like you can add "Louis Rossmann Repair Store" or only "Louis Rossmann" and have the repair store tag in, but not only "Repair Store" in name tag.        
We can not have "toilets" in name tag. stop arguing, if you keep arguing like this and do not understand I'm not going to be bothered to reply again.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 17:15:06+00:00): OK. I understand your words from the beginning and according to Wiki I tried to register the signs on the map. Our discussion ends here.
God bless you
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:05:29+00:00): The names of these places were registered according to the board. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:26:29+00:00): @ChehrehBargi You shall not add a descriptive name on object. The specific tag is enough to explain what this is.  read here:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#:~:text=Do%20not%20use%20name%3D*%20if%3A
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:42:56+00:00): I have recorded everything that was written on the sign of that place exactly and with its own numbering. I have not described.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:48:26+00:00): Read the link.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 06:04:29+00:00): I read it and it does not violate my work. My writings and edits are not against the rules. We are obliged to record everything that is on the boards of places and streets. We cannot write what we like according to our own taste.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:33:34+00:00): First of all, you used alien text, in name. We do not read it or understand what it saying, even it is not translatable!         
You added it as a memorial, base on my local knowledge this is only a regular building and not a memorial.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 17:09:51+00:00): you are right. Here is a glass chamber that shows the overall structure of this complex on a smaller scale and is called a maquette in English. So I also registered there as a monument.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 17:11:26+00:00): I think it is in Arabic: ماکیت
Lejun (2022-09-17 08:41:52+00:00): Le gros du travail a été fait, il reste des retouches à faire avec la précision des adresses et une mise à jour des noms de rues
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:03:33+00:00): These are not tents. There are buildings for special ceremonies that are held for 2 weeks a year. These buildings are constantly for this purpose and have specific names and uses. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:26:02+00:00): @ChehrehBargi Hello, I have correct the names you added from wrong alphabet to the correct one.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:38:40+00:00): I have added the names that were on the board of that building, and you completely deleted, for example, the name of the office and the name of the bathroom.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:42:08+00:00): You can not add name=toilet as a name for this object! read here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#:~:text=Do%20not%20use%20name%3D*%20if%3A
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:46:17+00:00): no I had written toilet 1. The same was written on the top of the door.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:48:03+00:00): Here in this changeset I have corrected the wrong grammar that you added. What is your complain about this changeset?
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 06:01:33+00:00): You have corrected in three cases and I thank you very much. But in the next three cases (الجناح رقم...) on the sign above the building, "سویت" is written, your registration in this case is contrary to what is written on the top of the building itself.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:30:23+00:00): The word you put is meant for the Iranians when they visit so they understand, the word you used is not in Arabic, I put Arabic as it's the main language.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 17:04:09+00:00): I will not interfere further. Whatever it is, it's your country. But please register in such a way that both Iraqi and Iranian are comfortable
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 17:05:03+00:00): Of course, if you have noticed, I also used the Iraqi language as a base and then added the Persian language
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:05:42+00:00): The names of these places were registered according to the board. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:25:07+00:00): @ChehrehBargi You shall not add a descriptive name on object. The specific tag is enough to explain what this is.  read here:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#:~:text=Do%20not%20use%20name%3D*%20if%3A
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:44:45+00:00): Every phrase that was written on the building, I have recorded the same in the map. The item I added is not a description, but I have seen and recorded it from the name of the building.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:47:00+00:00): You can not add descriptive names on 'name' tag. read the link, I'm not going to repeat myself if you don't understand.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 05:58:11+00:00): You do not understand what I am saying. If we do not name it, the type of use of the building will not be determined. I have not given a descriptive name. I have recorded the word that was written on top of the building.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:28:40+00:00): > If we do not name it, the type of use of the building will not be determined     
We shall never add descriptive names such as "name=property management" it should be tagged as office=property_management .   
Every WC have the word WC on them, should we add the word WC in name? no. read the provided link.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 17:02:07+00:00): I will not insist more. My attempt is to help everyone edit the map, of course, for the communities that want it. Therefore, I will not bother myself and you by prolonging the speech.
God bless you.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:04:09+00:00): These are not tents. There are buildings for special ceremonies that are held for 2 weeks a year. These buildings are constantly for this purpose and have specific names and uses. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:05:09+00:00): The names of these places were registered according to the board. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:39:11+00:00): I have added the names that were on the board of that building, and you completely deleted, for example, the name of the office and the name of the bathroom.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:41:37+00:00): You can not add name=toilet as a name for this object! read here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#:~:text=Do%20not%20use%20name%3D*%20if%3A
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 05:55:53+00:00): The name I gave had a number, so it can be registered as the name of that building. It was written on the board: Toilet number 1
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:26:28+00:00): Read comments again.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 16:56:28+00:00): Dear friend
I read and I won't bother you or myself any more. Unfortunately, our words have been drawn into arguments and debates.
finish
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:02:47+00:00): These are not tents. There are buildings for special ceremonies that are held for 2 weeks a year. These buildings are constantly for this purpose and have specific names and uses. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:23:13+00:00): @ChehrehBargi read changeset comment and read this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don’t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:37:00+00:00): Written: Put what is on the ground into the map
I have also seen that place closely. It is a building and not a tent. It is not temporary. It is constantly used for one task, but for a limited time: 14 days a year
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:37:52+00:00): 14 days a year = temporary
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 05:53:52+00:00): no Temporary means: its location should change - its structure should be temporary, such as tents and scaffolding - it should be rented (dedicated to several tasks during the year).
that the religious places that I have recorded do not have any of the conditions of being temporary, but are permanent. It is a solid building. Open regularly for part of the year. Its location does not change. It has a specific name. It is not dedicated to several jobs and is only for one job.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:26:03+00:00): 1 week a year = temporary    
And it is not confirmed to open in same location each year. We are locals, we know. you are from another country, you don't know as you don't see them each year like us.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 16:54:51+00:00): Dear friend
Unfortunately, our words have been drawn into arguments and debates.
Many pilgrims lose their companions on this route, and recording fixed buildings and their names, as well as the numbers of electric poles for easier addressing on the map, could have played a significant role in finding lost pilgrims. Of course, I followed the rules of the wiki. But you don't allow it. I will not bother you or myself any more. I hope you will be successful and proud. I entrust you to Imam Hussain (peace be upon him).
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:06:39+00:00): These are not temporary tents, but buildings, specially for special events that are held for 2 weeks a year. These buildings are constantly for this purpose and have specific names and uses. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:15:24+00:00): @ChehrehBargi, please don't map temporary objects. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don’t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:49:34+00:00): These are not temporary. I have seen all this up close. All are permanent buildings for religious use. They are not residential or private houses. They are open only 14 days a year. They are closed on the rest of the days
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 19:04:11+00:00): Building that is closed for all of the year and only open for 1 week or 2 is temporarily, you should map is as building=yes only.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 05:47:50+00:00): A building that is regularly open at certain times of the year and operates for a specific purpose (has only one user) and has a separate name cannot be said to be temporary. Even if we want to act according to your word, you have violated your word because you deleted the entire building and did not even leave it as building = yes.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:24:35+00:00): 1 week a year = temporary
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 16:50:56+00:00): Dear friend
Unfortunately, our words have been drawn into arguments and debates.
Pilgrims lose their companions on this route, and recording these fixed buildings and their names, as well as the numbers of electric poles for easier addressing on the map, could have played a significant role in finding lost pilgrims. Of course, I followed the rules of the wiki. But you don't allow it. I will not bother you or myself any more. I hope you are successful and proud and under the protection of Imam Hussain (peace be upon him).
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:07:43+00:00): These are not temporary tents, but buildings, specially for special events that are held for 2 weeks a year. These buildings are constantly for this purpose and have specific names and uses. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:21:57+00:00): @ChehrehBargi please don't map temporary objects that only open 1 week a year.     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don’t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:51:18+00:00): These are not temporary. I have seen all this up close. All are permanent buildings for religious use. They are not residential or private houses. They are open only 14 days a year. They are closed on the rest of the days
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 19:03:42+00:00): Building that is closed for all of the year and only open for 1 week or 2 is temporarily, you should map is as building=yes only.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 05:47:28+00:00): A building that is regularly open at certain times of the year and operates for a specific purpose (has only one user) and has a separate name cannot be said to be temporary. Even if we want to act according to your word, you have violated your word because you deleted the entire building and did not even leave it as building = yes.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:24:24+00:00): 1 week a year = temporary
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 16:46:34+00:00): Dear friend
Many pilgrims get lost on this route. My goal was to record these fixed locations and their names as well as the number of power poles for easier addressing on the map. Of course, I followed the rules of the wiki. But you don't allow it. I will not bother you or myself any more. I hope you are successful and proud and under the protection of Imam Hussain (peace be upon him).
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:08:22+00:00): These are not temporary tents, but buildings, specially for special events that are held for 2 weeks a year. These buildings are constantly for this purpose and have specific names and uses. You have ruined my efforts in change packages 126289353 and 126289362 and 126289165 and 126288821 and 126288860 and 126289205 and 126289375 and 126289381 and 126290421 and 126290035 and 126289402
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:21:33+00:00): @ChehrehBargi please don't map temporary objects that only open 1 week a year.    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don’t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:52:34+00:00): @LockOnGuy،
These are not temporary. I have seen all this up close. All are permanent buildings for religious use. They are not residential or private houses. They are open only 14 days a year. They are closed on the rest of the days
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 19:03:00+00:00): Building that is closed for all of the year and only open for 1 week or 2 is temporarily, you should map is as building=yes only.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 05:46:46+00:00): A building that is regularly open at certain times of the year and operates for a specific purpose (has only one user) and has a separate name cannot be said to be temporary. Even if we want to act according to your word, you have violated your word because you deleted the entire building and did not even leave it as building = yes.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:23:57+00:00): 1 week a year = temporary
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 16:44:43+00:00): Dear friend
Many pilgrims get lost on this route. My goal was to record these places and their names, as well as the number of electricity poles, for easier addressing on the map. Of course, I also followed the rules of the wiki. But you don't let it. I will not trouble you and myself any more. May you be successful and be protected by Imam Hussain (peace be upon him).
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 19:01:37+00:00): @LockOnGuy, you removed a medical center run by Iran for the Red Crescent. You also ruined my efforts in changepacks 126289353, 126289362, 126289165, 126288821, 126288860, 126289205, 126289375, 126289381, 126290421, 126290035, 12628129402, and 12628129402.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 19:05:22+00:00): This clinic are temporary here for a week and then closes, it shall not mapped.       https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don’t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-18 05:41:57+00:00): Does this clinic have other users during the rest of the year or is it closed altogether?
If the clinic in this building is rented and is dedicated to another business during the rest of the year, you are right. Otherwise, it must be registered.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 06:06:27+00:00): It is temporary, temporary things should never be mapped. stop spam commenting.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-19 16:39:08+00:00): My words are not spam.
But due to the issue getting off the main track and the discussion becoming repetitive, we will end here.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:13:18+00:00): The name of this street is written on the signs on the electricity poles. You have a problem with Hosseini's Arbaeen ceremony. You have ruined my efforts in changepacks 126289353, 126289362, 126289165, 126288821, 126288860, 126289205, 126289375, 126289381, 126290421, 126290035, 12628129402, and 12628129402.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-17 18:20:47+00:00): @ChehrehBargi read changeset comment. We do not have names for residential roads in Iraq, only numbers.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-17 18:59:22+00:00): @LockOnGuy So why are the streets named? There is a sign for this alley. Official board