piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RSergei (2015-07-04 17:05:14+00:00): Ещё от себя добавлю, что добавляйте также название улицы к номеру дома. Согласно http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3 
Удачи в начинаниях. Если будут вопросы пишите в личку или на форум http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=71194
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
eggie (2021-05-04 19:17:00+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen... bijdeze alsnog  

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MKnight (2015-08-04 19:05:47+00:00): Mhh. Hier ist wohl einiges kaputtgegangen, der Relation fehlen etliche Teile.
Tchiller (2016-07-08 10:46:13+00:00): Ist hier kein Oneway mehr? Falls nicht, dann ist die Velospurangabe widersprüchlich. Vielen Dank.
zwis (2016-07-09 07:12:48+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Die Velospuren müssten vor Ort überprüft werden. Vielleicht komme ich gelegentlich dazu.
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
MKnight (2016-05-21 09:49:04+00:00): was soll denn extern heissen?
Hjart (2015-07-09 07:18:01+00:00): Bemærk at du i stedet for Bings kan vælge at bruge Geodatastyrelsens fotos (imagery), som generelt er  i højere opløsning og lidt mere akkurate og desuden optaget i foråret hvor det er nemmere at se stier mm under træer.
Self-Perfection (2015-07-03 13:12:31+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Вы этой правкой создали дорогу https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358311719, обозначенную как highway=residential.

Мне же кажется, что это слишком высокий для ней статус. ИМХО это типичный highway=service.

Вы руководствовались какими-то критериями, когда присваивали ей тег highway=residential?
Epolyanichev (2015-07-28 11:08:49+00:00): Согласен на статус highway=service
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-09-07 08:12:43+00:00): Hi Suki52,
I changed the classification of the road (way358311964) to be unclassified highway. I also made some changes around this changeset. Thank you.
literan (2015-07-07 09:39:30+00:00): контур был не замкнут
sabas88 (2015-07-03 13:21:55+00:00): Io lascerei l'alt_name come Via Sampierdarena per permettere le ricerche (comunemente è scritto nel modo 'storpiato')
EneaSuper (2015-07-03 17:13:17+00:00): Non hai tutti in torti perché purtroppo da problemi, ma sarebbe comunque errato.
Hai altre soluzioni?

E comunque il nome reale della via è quello di quando Sampierdarena era comune, divenendo quartiere è stato mantenuto per un po fino a quello attuale
sabas88 (2015-07-03 17:24:54+00:00): alt_name non appare sulla mappa e viene considerato comunque dai 'motori di ricerca' :-)
EneaSuper (2015-07-03 17:28:28+00:00): A perfetto, allora lo modifico subito! :D
Se ho problemi ti contatto in privato
Сергій Дубик (2015-07-03 14:41:27+00:00): Дякую за позначення! Доповнив дані — http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3632621135
ma-rt-in (2015-07-04 07:33:48+00:00): Was meinst du mit disused?
Joachim Moskalewski (2015-07-04 07:49:13+00:00): Geht es um den langen Weg den Hang entlang ("Römersteig")? Da war ich vor wenigen Tagen - da wird auf dem Pfad nicht mal mehr das Laub beseite getreten… der wird kaum mehr begangen, und um so weiter man zur Mitte kommt sieht man dem Weg an, dass viele die Einsteigen auch wieder umkehren. Stellen sind abgerutscht und müssen frei gesucht werden, Bäume liegen quer - und der Weg wird schon lange nicht mehr gerichtet (Stichwort Wegsicherungspflicht?). Durch nachrutschendes Gestein ist der Weg auch am Verschwinden. Ich habe dort nur ein "disused=yes" gesetzt - das "richtige" disused setzen wäre alle Werte auf "disused:*=*" zu setzen. Also so ne Art Vorstufe, damit andere die dort eine Tour (wie ich z.B. mit Mehrtagesgepäck) gewarnt sein können. Der Verbindungsweg danach wuchert massivst zu - den habe ich daher auf disused gesetzt. Schneidet den mal wieder jemand frei, wirds eben wieder geändert. Der Wegverlauf dort passte auch gar nicht zum Vorgefundenen - es gab z.B. keine Kehre nach oben, sondern nur nach unten…

…aber was ich mich frage: Warum steht da noch als "source" bei meinen Änderungen vergangenes von früherem mappen… habe wohl was übersehen…
Sebastian79 (2015-07-03 10:55:17+00:00): Kommentar passt nicht, hat der Browser von einer alten Änderung als Auto-Text hinzugefügt.
Hier besteht ein Problem mit der Routing Funktion mit Fahrrädern, die Strecke wird normalerweise vermieden - dabei ist diese auch mit Trekkingrädern sehr gut passierbar. Stattdessen wird man einen nahezu unpassierbaren Waldweg entlang geschickt.
calfarome (2015-07-08 19:44:53+00:00): Hi PlaneMad, there are many duplicate nodes in this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3632810452/history#map=16/11.9218/79.8129
PlaneMad (2015-12-21 10:48:33+00:00): Thanks, fixed here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36082512
Президент Ирака (2018-11-03 13:08:30+00:00): waterway=milestone и DISMAR=### некорректно или устарело
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Seamark_Objects
Skippern (2015-07-04 20:13:15+00:00): Como tribunal eleitoral e um órgão publico do governo, eu acho esse deve ter o etiqueta office=government, mas posivelmente pode ser office=lawyer + lawyer=notary também. Ja corrigi para escritório do governo, mas voce e livre a corregir se acho que lawyer=notary e melhor.
Swen Wacker (2015-07-05 15:19:23+00:00): Hallo,

schön dass Du Dich für OpenStreetMap interessiert. Wenn Du Fragen hast, dann wende DIch gern an mich, besuche mal unseren Stammtisch (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCneburg/Mappertreffen) oder geh ins Forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14. 

Heute habe ich eine Frage an Dich: Warum hast Du den Hydranten verschoben?
whb (2016-08-06 08:42:17+00:00): Sicher, dass die Bäckerei Tritsch mitten im Wald ist?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3633033593
SK53 (2016-03-10 15:35:44+00:00): As a non-Indonesian I do not know what hospital:type=C might mean. I would suggest using a longer string so that it is easier to relate to hospitals elsewhere.
flohoff (2015-07-03 17:57:43+00:00): Warum? Eigentlich erfassen wir doch auch Hauszufahrten - service=driveway ist doch genau dafür. 

Flo
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-16 07:43:48+00:00): hi, bigalxyz123. Your edit looks awesome.
I found the water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/358377418) crossing with the highway id 967466521, is there a bridge or embankment?
would you mind fixing this issue (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/142917565)? or let me know if there's any update on this area.
Thank you and happy mapping
skorasaurus (2015-07-22 21:54:32+00:00): thanks for the additional changes; I'm heading to Atwood Lake this weekend and hope to add a few more details. I considerably improved Carroll County after I spent a weekend there last summer.
eggie (2017-12-29 16:07:50+00:00): alsnog welkom gestuurd per PB
zorglubu (2023-07-29 09:10:20+00:00): Bonjour,

Je suis tombé par hasard sur ce nœud (et son voisin) : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3633148316

Je présume qu'il manque un autre attribut, mais aucune idée de ce que c'est. Tu t'en rappelles ?

Bien cordialement.
aytfadc (2023-08-04 16:38:06+00:00): il s'agit de la référence d'un indicateur, je suppose pour le suivi à partir d'un hélicoptère
Rovastar (2015-08-11 00:22:22+00:00): Not sure why you have reclassified this section of the A412 as a secondary road.
These are (in general) for the B roads.
I changed this back. Feel free to discuss
DrBazUK (2015-08-19 11:19:07+00:00): quite right, I'm not sure what I was doing with the reclassification and thought I had reverted most of them... guess I missed that one
JLOSM (2025-06-16 02:16:55+00:00): Hola, al observar en Imágenes aéreas de Esri Mundial, en este conjunto de cambios, quedaron quedaron algunas quebradas naturales iniciando en ascenso y luego cruzando un filo para descender por gravedad, que es lo que realmente funciona. Como esta por ejemplo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358393654#map=16/6.00607/-76.09558&layers=https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358393654#map=16/6.00607/-76.09558&layers=D.
Himké (2015-07-03 18:40:41+00:00): Road directions changed from default assumptions
GerdP (2015-10-31 09:41:02+00:00): Bitte prüfen:
highway=discussed ist sehr unüblich,
wenn highway=proposed (noch) nicht passt, besser gar kein highway=* tag verwenden.
Siehe auch 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-highway-that-doesn-t-exist-tp5857111.html
GerdP (2015-10-31 09:42:20+00:00): Die folgende Abfrage liefert die Wege:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/cnM
GerdP (2015-11-05 15:36:41+00:00): Noch keine Idee?
fndoder (2015-07-19 19:01:15+00:00): Для прежнего название есть специальный тег - old_name (old_name:en).
Перенёс старое название туда (пакет правок 32738818).
Nakaner (2016-02-05 00:04:54+00:00): Warum hast du das Gebiet von DR in DB umbenannt? Solange der Gemeinderat keinen entsprechenden Beschluss gefasst hat, bleibt der Name der DR, auch wenn es die Reichsbahn nun seit über 20 Jahren nicht mehr gibt.
stadtvermesser (2016-02-05 13:07:01+00:00): Weil die Stadtverwaltung Halle dieses Gebiet in ihrer amtlichen klein-/grossräumigen Gliederung so benennt, siehe: http://tinyurl.com/hmwhx4p
Nakaner (2016-02-05 13:39:12+00:00): Wir haben aber nicht die erforderlichen Rechte, Daten von dort zu übernehmen. Dort steht "© Stadt Halle […]".
chillly (2015-07-03 20:15:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM

You seem to have changed a service road into a tertiary road, which seems very unlikely to be right. I'm not sure what the parking change is to do. If you need some help you can reply to this comment or send me an OSM message.
garethpauljones (2015-07-03 20:20:10+00:00): Hiya. Now that the construction work has been completed on the replacement Moy's End Stand, a new road has been added (could be a service road) which runs into the football club but along the north stand to the car park behind the east stand. This car park has also been reduced in size to accommodate the housing development off Hawksbill Way. The new East stand is also larger.
chillly (2015-07-03 20:39:55+00:00): OK. I would suggest that the road is changed to a service road. The car park looks fine. 

Are you happy changing the road type?
garethpauljones (2015-07-03 20:41:39+00:00): Done - thanks for the help!
trasa_gd (2015-07-06 09:00:40+00:00): Hej, wiesz coś więcej. Zamierzałem tam podjechać i obejrzeć złoszenie (przy okazji mam interes "geocachingowy"). Oznaczony jest tunel a nie przejazd więc interesują mnie szczegóły.
przemas75 (2015-07-06 10:02:28+00:00): W tym rejonie ciężko będzie się przedostać, robią chyba jakąś mijankę w torowisku... Tunel w zeszłym tygodniu kompletnie zamknięty. Da radę przejść po torach, w okolicach starego dworca Wielki Kack - może od tego zakrętu Nowodworcowa (gdzie idzie droga polna na drugą stronę). Jutro będę najprawdopodobniej jechał tamtędy rowerem, to mogę dać więcej informacji jeśli chcesz.
Ale ogólnie bardzo słabo teraz wygląda ten rejon na rower, sporo ciężarówek, trochę ciężkiego sprzętu.
trasa_gd (2015-07-06 10:30:17+00:00): Zazwyczaj jeździłem rowerem od strony wiaduktu pod obwodnicą. Dzięki za pilnowanie zmian.
przemas75 (2015-07-06 10:36:52+00:00): Pod obwodnicą się da; póki co to tam zakopali chyba światłowód dla PKM (ale może też PKP), może być miejscami nierówno z tego powodu, ale też nie dramatyzowałbym - ile to potrzeba miejsca na kabel.
Tyle, że jest problem za obwodnicą w kierunku Wielkopolskiej/Chwaszczyńskiej. Ten nasyp kolejowy dość mocno poszerzyli i zdaje się pomiędzy tymi budynkami  przy Ornej (numery 85,87) może być ścieżka zlikwidowana. Nie wiem jak z tym dzikim przejściem przez tory (jest oznaczony jako ścieżka). Z daleka widać było, że ten nasyp jest dość bardzo długi.
trasa_gd (2015-07-06 11:14:06+00:00): Właśnie takie "dzikie" przejścia przez tory mnie zastanawiają. Jeśli są wyraźnie wydeptane, to je oznaczam. Tu jest inny przykład: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/54.41261/18.46655
rickmastfan67 (2015-08-30 14:39:48+00:00): I'm just curious, but why did you extend 'East Catherine Street' in this changeset to the west of the intersection of it with PA-601 (North Center Avenue)?  

Looking at the Tiger data, it shows it as part of 'West Catherine Street' instead.  Anyways, it should never have been extended to the west as a 'tertiary' highway past the intersection with PA-601.  It's clearly a 'residential' highway on that side of PA-601 when you look at Bing's imagery, and should have been tagged as such.  Also, when you look at the street grid here in Somerset, PA, you can easily see that 'Center Avenue' is where roads with the 'East/West' names change between those cardinal directions.
abel801 (2015-08-31 13:45:42+00:00): Thanks for the feedback, I realize that you are right so I modified the road with the proper name that TIGER shows me.
pnorman (2015-07-03 21:54:06+00:00): You seem to be adding data that is not map data. What is this data from?

OpenStreetMap is for geographic map data, not general drawing.

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
Hjart (2015-07-13 11:20:16+00:00): Jeg er ikke enig. Hvis de ud fra en pragmatisk synsvinkel må anses for primært at være cykelstier så foretrækker jeg at tagge dem som sådan.
Nakaner (2015-07-04 11:33:58+00:00): Dir ist klar, dass dieser Changeset über kurz oder lang revertiert werden wird? Oder kannst du eine schriftliche Nutzungserlaubnis für geoportal.de vorweisen?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-05 09:38:41+00:00): Kolego, proszę ręcznie nie przenosić adresacji na obrysy, ponieważ gubisz informację o źródle. Sugeruję rysowanie samych obrysów, a ich integrację z adresami zostaw komuś innemu.
Pozdrawiam
marcoos69 (2015-07-05 16:59:02+00:00): Początkowe budynki robione w ID parę dni temu faktycznie mogły mieć ten problem - ale już ostatnie zmiany w josm są robione z kopiowaniem wszystkich tagów z punktów adresowych (także żródło)
Xerberim (2015-07-03 21:49:50+00:00): Änderungen rund um das Voest-Gelände, hauptsächlich um das Routing durch geschlossene Tore zu verhindern.
FTA (2015-07-06 05:02:09+00:00): Nice to see some more people adding sidewalks ;)...I've been slowly working on filling them in on the far west side the past few months.
bleege (2015-07-07 01:13:52+00:00): Agreed!  I don't often have time to put houses in, but sidewalks are pretty quick to knock out.  Plus, anything non-car related is cool.  :-)
Xerberim (2015-07-03 21:51:47+00:00): Ergänzung des Fußweges über die Hafenbrücke ("Fahrverbot, ausgenommen unmotorisierte Fahrzeuge geschoben")
colt_cannon (2015-07-03 22:58:23+00:00): Added Joyces Dr.
philippec (2020-02-17 10:08:38+00:00): Brussel Basiliek Koekelberg is not a cathedral.   How is it possible that you make such mistakes ? , even more strange is that they last for four years.
Palolo (2019-10-14 16:54:42+00:00): Thanks for adding these lakes. The shapes on some are a little rough for a cartographer.
bluetable (2016-10-25 07:19:56+00:00): Hi etajin, I reverted the Hiroshima node (1590291928) back in its central location as per documentation.

I based my opinion on this text "position a node at the recognized centre of the place, which may be location of the […] central square" from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Nodes

My assumption might be false, I'll be happy to discuss about it. Freayd
Peter Dobratz (2015-10-07 21:56:39+00:00): I just walked by here and can't see a mailbox here.  If I can't figure out where the node was meant to be placed, I'll delete it.  As far as tagging in general goes though, I prefer to omit the name tag on mailboxes, but use the operator tag with a value of "United States Postal Service"
Peter Dobratz (2015-10-08 02:26:22+00:00): It was me that was confused about the mailbox location.  There is a mailbox here.
Rudolf Mayer (2015-07-07 11:23:31+00:00): I reverted your edits - this motorway is not yet opened, and thus shouldn't be marked as such.
If you really need one reason why people shouldn't be led on the motorway by their navigation devices just yet, then read this: http://www.aradon.ro/accident-cu-sapte-raniti-pe-autostrada-inchisa-pecica-arad/1547913
user_11166885 (2020-06-17 10:48:00+00:00): Il nodo Via Flavia 2128 Esiste davvero? Fonti? Via Flavia ha veramente così tanti civici?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-03 09:42:38+00:00): 2128 non appartiene a Via Flavia, ma a Santa Maria Maddalena Inferiore. Se non mi sbaglio corrisponderebbe alle vecchie tabelle dei civici bianche con scritta rossa.
fabiotofy (2021-10-04 06:16:24+00:00): Confermo, a Trieste esistono ancora degli edifici a cui non è mai stata aggiornata la toponomastica e sono rimasti con delle numerazioni, anche altissime (mille e passa) facente riferimento a delle località. Sono perlopiù edifici legati al mondo della chiesa o locali tecnici. Vedasi ad esempio tutti i civici di Trieste per "Località Città (vecchia)" oppure . Sono le tabelline bianche con le scritte rosse. I civici per la località S.M.M. Inferiore sono 52, ma ce ne sono anche 10 per la località S.M.M. Superiore.
RafalR (2015-07-04 15:55:55+00:00): Co to za linia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358480522 ?
Brian Reavis (2015-08-06 10:57:15+00:00): Please stop. A road being dirt does not make it a track. It's well developed (just not paved), maintained by the county, and has multiple residences on it. Even if it were a track, why not bother doing the rest? It's these sorts of edits that make OSM a mess. 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/iri6anxlu38tw1j/Screenshot%202015-08-06%2004.50.45.png?dl=0
boneco (2015-07-05 18:32:20+00:00): Boa tarde nitrofurano, gostaria de informar que a comunidade brasileira está removendo a tag landuse=residential que envolver toda a cidade, deixando somente aquelas que representam por exemplo bairros. 
Nesse caso, a way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358481176 não se faz necessário.
passar bem.
msevilla00 (2016-06-18 15:30:15+00:00): Hola,
La clave "comment" [1] solo se usa para los conjuntos de cambios (changesets) para los otros elementos debes usar la clave "description" [2]
1 - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:comment
2 - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Lo encontré al buscar ese mismo error en mis ediciones.
Un saludo
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:12:01+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358489946
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 11:59:53+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84959157
Basstoelpel (2018-04-11 13:32:52+00:00): Moin surftux,

hier hast Du scheinbar an einigen Gebäuden die falsche Straße zugeordnet. Das fiel mir bei https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/map#16/52.0804/10.2321/osm-wrongcity-wrongstreet-outsideplz-dupes auf. Magst Du das bitte korrigieren?

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
SomeoneElse (2015-07-07 09:14:59+00:00): The changeset source http://www.wainwright.org.uk/images/coasttocoast/route-amend-1-shap-abbey-la.jpg doesn't appear to be a valid source for OpenStreetMap (from the information contained in the image), but doesn't seem to have been used for most of the changes here?
kreuzschnabel (2015-07-07 11:11:41+00:00): You’re right. I didn’t copy any real features from the source given, I just adjusted the C2C route to it (since the route mapped in relation 12145 was using private roads, as stated in the source).
aseerel4c26 (2015-07-06 19:02:50+00:00): Ich habe den User per Mail angeschrieben und Hilfe angeboten.
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
naoliv (2016-01-13 13:11:14+00:00): From where did you take the street names, pleases?
FJRuizRuano (2016-01-13 13:16:11+00:00): From Google Maps
naoliv (2016-01-13 13:19:02+00:00): We can't use names from Google Maps or any other copyrighted source...
Did you include more names from Google in other places?
FJRuizRuano (2016-01-13 13:21:42+00:00): But has street names copyright?
naoliv (2016-01-13 13:25:08+00:00): Google terms/license doesn't allow any usage of their data - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F please.
They also have copyright easter eggs - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_Easter_Eggs
FJRuizRuano (2016-01-13 13:28:50+00:00): Oh! I didn't know that. I have just used Google Maps Names in this changeset. Should I do something?
naoliv (2016-01-13 13:31:36+00:00): Unfortunatelly they have to be removed from OSM.
I will contact the DWG (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group) and ask this.
It will be necessary to insert them again, using a valid source.
For example, in Brazil we have the IBGE layer with the street names.
FJRuizRuano (2016-01-13 13:50:37+00:00): Oh! I'm sorry for that. I will try to use other sources.
Than you.
naoliv (2016-01-13 13:55:07+00:00): No problem.
Thank you for understanding.
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-17 06:46:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32689429 where the changeset comment is: Remove edits by SMAPPINGPVT as they were based on the mistaken assumption that they were working on a private copy of the map.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-06 01:05:59+00:00): Well that didn't work.  I'll have to have a look in more detail about what is needed to have the name rendered on the largest of the outers only.
shura0 (2015-07-07 10:18:03+00:00): Привет.

Тег bicycle=yes означает возможность ЮРИДИЧЕСКОГО проезда, а не физического. Я полагаю все такие теги с тропинок можно убирать, проезд на велосипеде там не запрещен.
Skippern (2015-07-04 20:14:58+00:00): Parque deve ser mapeado como um area, e não como um ponto
Cowboy79 (2015-07-13 19:35:24+00:00): Ist das ein offizieller Name? Denn kurz vor Ende des Weges befindet sich die "Absperrstation Flugstraße". Das deutet darauf hin, dass es sich um die Verlängerung der Flugstraße handelt!
MfG
Stefan
DaveF (2015-07-04 17:31:45+00:00): Hi Snake Skin

There's an expression in OSM: 'Don't tag incorrectly to suit the renderer'.

For accuracyIf a KG is a KG then it should be tagged as such. If you wish an item to be visible in a specific render you should contact the person creating the tiles.

Cheers
Dave F.
Snake Sting (2015-07-07 17:06:52+00:00): Why don't kissing gates or stiles show up on OSM?  What I mean is when you zoom right it will tell you if you hover the mouse over the node but not as a symbol on the map like gates.  It would be very usefull for anybody on a bike knowing if there is a ton of stiles or kissing gates to leave bike and walk the route.  This has happened to me in the past and it was a nightmare lifting my bike over a ton of kissing gates.  They don't show on the Geocaching website and that is the same map I use on my phone.

I have stopped doing that now but why can't there be a symbol displayed like gates on OSM?