piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
xChAoSx (2018-01-08 13:08:25+00:00): I am a new here on OSM so I'm not yet familiar with things here. To further explain my self; Regarding the naming of puroks, I'll qoute the sentences from [this section](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions#Administrative_boundaries)  of Philippine's Mapping Convention; "Do not add Sitio on the name, i.e.: name=Duluhan, not name=Sitio Duluhan, except when "Sitio" is very vital to the name and commonly used.
Puroks are usually numbered, and the "Purok" prefix is mainly vital to the name and prevents confusion with numbered barangay, so, it should be included.". As what you've read in the last part, that is my reason why i included "purok" in the name. Moving on to the 'purok=hamlet' issue, apart from the response of the OSMph facebook page, it is also stated [here](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions/Local_government) in the convention summary table that sitio/purok should be tagged with 'place=hamlet'. On to the 'designation=*' tag, it was never mentioned in the [local mapping convention](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions) nor in the [key:place](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place) page of using said tag as combination. As for my opinion, why use 'designation=district/barangay/purok/sitio' when there is a more appropriate/recommended 'place:PH=district/barangay/purok/sitio'. Also check the taginfo of both tags.
GOwin (2018-01-08 15:14:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM @xChAoSx! It's good to know that you're checking out the documentation for the tagging convention and practices.

First of all, the barangay/purok/sitio qualifers are unnecessary when objects are tagged properly, and boundary polygons are available. (Boundaries for most PH municipalities are already available in OSM, lower than these, it's spotty.) The use of barangay/purok/sitio are only **vital** especially if they are numbered (i.e. Barangay II-A, Purok 7, Sito 12), otherwise the map rendering will be littered by Barangay X, Purok Y, Sito Z that may not add much value to the map. If you ever use maps on smaller devices or mobile, you'll have a better appreciation why it makes sense to keep this as short and simple as possible. In this case, "San Francisco" should be sufficient. 

OpenStreetMap is a global project, local mapping conventions and practices are defined by the community. It's also  a free-tagging system, and mappers are free to propose and define their own tags, and (nominally) subject to community acceptance.

The "designation" tag is a mature, globally accepted tag to "record the legal classification of an object." Are sitios and puroks legally recognized in the Philippines? Yes! Therefore, this makes "designation" a valid tag to describe an object. It doesn't affect the rendering, one way or the other (at least, at present) and is more simple than all these place:PH=* or admin_type:PH tags being used. 

Sitios and puroks are not administrative entities, and IMO, is inappropriate for use with admin_type:PH

Your use of is_in is also incomplete. Define it like:
name = San Vicente
official_name = Purok San Vicente
designation = purok
is_in:village = Baluan
is_in:city = Gen. Santos City
is_in:province = South Cotabato

This way, the Nominatim search engine can place their hierarchial connections correctly. Optionally, you may add other tags like *:PH=*, but it doesn't affect the way the object is rendered on the map.

is_in:province is largely unnecessary, if you can onfirm that the municipality has a (correct) boundary polygon. 

If you are interested in polishing your OSM skillset, check out self-paced learning modules from https://learnOSM.org. Keep mapping!
GOwin (2018-01-09 01:48:46+00:00): Correction:
is_in:city = General Santos
xChAoSx (2018-01-09 05:42:57+00:00): It feels good to be enlightened. Thanks for your help, I will fix my edits when i got time.
viloan (2018-01-06 15:33:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
peppeBA (2018-01-06 16:45:15+00:00): Grazie "delle spine". Ho anche imparato (io camminatore) cosa vuol dire single track per voi mtb. Salutoni
frosm (2019-06-05 13:28:26+00:00): bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191157290
qu'est ce que c'est ?
ce n'est pas l'incinérateur vu que celui-ci est juste contre. du coup on y fait quoi dans ce silo ?
viloan (2018-01-06 15:41:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
literan (2018-01-07 12:58:21+00:00): Здравствуйте! не надо, пожалуйста, от балды назначать статусы дорогам. Они назначаются не для красоты, а согласно их значимости в дорожной сети, согласно соглашению: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification Ваши подобные правки придется откатить.
Johnny Carlsen (2019-02-06 04:49:42+00:00): I was doing some photo mapping in this area and noticed that you added what looks like a Kasikorn Bank but you named it Thai Farmers Bank Plc. I am not too familiar with Thai banks, is this the same thing?, Is the current naming correct, or did the bank change?

You can see their sign in this photo (on the right):
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/uMRDeF1SrDHJUN1-M3pKyA
fkMohr (2018-02-11 19:00:16+00:00): Version #42 war die richtige.
alo8 (2018-02-11 20:03:32+00:00): Sollte jetzt passen...
maraf24 (2018-01-07 22:09:29+00:00): @Krzysztof Krajewski: Spoko, wszystkie adresy są ok i działają, gdzie mają działać.
abakus_uploader (2018-01-08 06:51:11+00:00): Krzysztof przepraszam za kolegę Maraf24, który wprowadził Cię w błąd. Adresy z takim tagowaniem w szczególnych przypadkach nie będą działały prawidłowo w geokoderach używanych przez oprogramowanie Państwowej Straży Pożarnej - wiem bo ja je napisałem. Maraf - zanim posniesiesz krzyk, że skoro nie działają to geokoder jest źle napisany - spróbuj napisać chociaż jeden a będziesz wiedział dlaczego tak ma być
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-01-08 08:47:05+00:00): @Krzysztof: Kolega maraf24 wprowadza w błąd, podobnie jak przeglądarkowy edytor iD.
Znacznik addr:street= nie powinien występować łącznie ze znacznikiem addr:place. Jednak nie ma problemu, poprawiłem adresację punktów, które dodałeś.
maraf24 (2018-01-08 15:06:03+00:00): @abakus_uploader: Jakim cudem przez tyle lat działał Ci ten dekoder prawidłowo? Czy wiesz, ile jest adresów tak otagowanych w Polsce? Naprawdę nie umiesz napisać dekodera, który by sobie radził z takim prostym przypadkiem?
@Zbigniew_Czernik: Czy wiesz, ile sam utworzyłeś punktów adresowych z tym kodowaniem, które teraz uważasz za błędne? Jak to jest, że dopiero 2 tygodnie temu się zorientowałeś, że coś z tymi adresami jest nie tak?
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-01-08 15:09:36+00:00): Chłopie, weź się ogarnij. Nigdy w życiu nie tworzyłem adresów z jednoczesnym występowaniem addr:street= i addr:place=
Coś Ci się pokiełbasiło.
maraf24 (2018-01-08 15:17:32+00:00): Czy jedynym sposobem dyskutowania jaki znasz to zaprzeczanie?
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-01-08 15:32:28+00:00): Tu nie ma o czym dyskutować.
maraf24 (2018-01-08 16:11:54+00:00): To nie dyskutujmy.
Krzysztof Krajewski (2018-01-14 00:12:57+00:00): Dziękuję za poprawki ;) Generalnie chciałem zobaczyć po prostu jak działa OSM.  Pozdrawiam!
abakus_uploader (2018-01-14 09:35:26+00:00): Cześć Krzysztof. Przepraszam, że nasze spory przeniosły się na twój changeset. Mam nadzieję że samo mapowanie się spodobało i będziesz gościł częściej. Jakbyś miał jakieś pytania to pisz - chętnie pomogę.
Pozdrawiam
eggie (2018-01-06 16:24:10+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Ik kijk even naar je edit, want het is niet helemaal goed gegaan. Probeer info op de adresnodes te zetten en niet op het gebouw zelf. Ook krijgen gebouwen niet nog eens een adres.
Ook heb je geprobeerd het gebouw nog een keer over te tekenen. Dat is ook niet nodig.
eggie (2018-01-06 16:34:29+00:00): De info staat nu op de kadaster adresnode. De door jou verwijderde kadasterinfo van het gebouw staat er weer op.
De oneigenlijke overtrek heb ik verwijderd.
eggie (2018-01-06 16:38:13+00:00): Middels PB contact gehad.
Cyclono (2018-01-07 12:02:26+00:00): Hi John, thank you for the contribution. I drew the service road as I thought cars could drive through when the gates were open. That small street is closed for any access. It has some historical value I think. Whether it is a footpath or a service road, I am not sure.
redrace (2018-01-08 12:27:18+00:00): HUHU
Schönen Dank für das Ändern der Rufnummern! :-)

Schöne Grüße
chihchun (2018-01-06 16:48:28+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55215320
SafwatHalaby (2018-01-07 23:27:23+00:00): You changed "Rima" to "Prima" in English, but the name is still "rima" in other languages. Which one is correct?
BenoitMenez (2018-01-16 17:01:44+00:00): In my opinion there should only be English and hebrew. The hotel does not advertise in other languages. i can confirm that the English name starts with a P, so in other languages it also should.
avm (2018-01-09 07:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55285293 where the changeset comment is: Revert non existing parks
chihchun (2018-01-06 16:47:46+00:00): 您好，地址不需要加上 No.
chihchun (2018-01-06 16:47:52+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55215898
avm (2018-01-09 07:51:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55285289 where the changeset comment is: Revert non existing parks
rurseekatze (2018-01-11 13:56:06+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55215956
avm (2018-01-09 07:50:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55285268 where the changeset comment is: Revert non existing parks
Gumeg (2018-01-16 10:15:45+00:00): Добрый день! Сейчас есть МУ МВД Балаковское (а не ГУВД). Кроме того одна точка полиции уже была отмечена, я удалил дубляж.
SafwatHalaby (2018-01-07 23:31:59+00:00): Hi. You've changed major relations without discussing with the local community. This should have been discussed first.
zstadler (2018-01-23 09:55:29+00:00): Specifically, what is the justification for
- Changing the role of Ramalla in the West Bank relation from "admin_center" to "label" 
- Changing the role of Jerusalem in the Israel relation from "admin_center" to "proclaimed_capital"
zstadler (2018-01-29 16:32:31+00:00): Hello Павел Гетманцев,
.
Tomorrow will be a week since I've sent you a message. It is already more than 3 weeks since the first message about this changeset.
.
I'm planning to revert the changes related to Ramalla and Jerusalem tomorrow unless I hear from you.
zstadler (2018-02-01 07:31:41+00:00): Reverted
avm (2018-01-09 07:50:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55285264 where the changeset comment is: Revert non existing parks
Tomas Straupis (2018-01-07 10:02:16+00:00): Pėsčiųjų šaligatvis, kuris yra tiesiog kelio dalis (be fizinio atskyrimo, kelios plytelės šalia kelio) atskiru vektoriumi nežymimas. Priežastis: tai neduoda jokio naudos nei žemėlapiuose, nei maršrutizavime, bet paprastai stipriai padidina kelių tinklo sudėtingumą ir klaidų skaičių. Tokius kelius vėliau tvarkant arba ištriname arba pridedame papildomą žymą footway=sidewalk ir tada pagal tą žymą ignoruojame tokius kelius visuose įmanomuose taikymuose.
Plačiau Lietuvos pėsčiųjų takų žymėjimo susitarimai:
https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/P%C4%97s%C4%8Di%C5%B3j%C5%B3_keliai
Pranske (2018-01-07 16:57:57+00:00): Supratau, pasitaisysiu, ateityje žinosiu
avm (2018-01-09 07:49:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55285234 where the changeset comment is: Revert non existing parks
SafwatHalaby (2018-01-07 23:34:34+00:00): Hi, you've changed a neutral name into a slightly disputed name without discussing with the local community.
streckenkundler (2018-01-07 15:34:22+00:00): Hei,

eine riesengroße Bitte! 

Verändere und arbeite mit iD nach Möglichkeit Niemals administrative Grenzen... iD ist dafür äußerst ungeeignet, gerade wenn man frisch anfängt. Dazu bitte stets JOSM nehmen und dann stets darant achten, daß der Ring der Grenzrelation geschlossen ist... Das erfordert auch etwas Einarbeitungszeit.
Es ist jetzt kein Beinbruch, aber mangels Kenntnisse in dem Gebiet habe ich im Forum mal gebeten, daß sich das ein anderer mal anschaut...

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=679219#p679219

Danke,

Sven
eggie (2018-01-06 19:18:46+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Jakka (2018-01-06 19:33:30+00:00): Is the location of this ATM really there on the border of the water without any building ???
zors1843 (2018-01-08 14:36:46+00:00): Misplaced or unexisting.  Removed
eggie (2018-01-06 19:24:25+00:00): Dag Rufio, Je maakt op het Europaplein zelf adressen aan. Vaak zijn BAG adressen al aanwezig op de kaart en kun je beter daar gebruik van maken. Het is soms even zoeken. Dit om te voorkomen dat adressen 2x in de data staan. Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-01-06 19:52:39+00:00): Coolblue was al een keer getagd op de adresnode. De info heb ik overgezet op de BAG node. Het nummer van de fitness ligt in het riedeltje rechtsonder. Dat hoor je eigenlijk te gebruiken. Ga je dat zelf doen?
rufio64 (2018-01-07 12:29:57+00:00): Goed punt, dat had ik niet door, ik heb het aangepast!
zors1843 (2018-01-07 07:06:43+00:00): Hi,
Voor het intekenen van gebouwen gebruik je als achtergrond beter de "Belgium AGIV/GRB Flanders" laag, i.p.v. de luchtbeelden.
Alecs01 (2018-01-06 17:53:54+00:00): Ciao, non togliere il tag highway=pedestrian per favore, indica che si tratta di un'area pedonale
francesco abbadini (2018-01-06 20:03:25+00:00): ok grazie!
zstadler (2018-01-23 09:12:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members says the "subarea" role is "Optional, disputed and redundant".

Why did you decide to add such members?

The same question applies to your changesets
http://osm.org/browse/changeset/55220079
http://osm.org/browse/changeset/55220132
http://osm.org/browse/changeset/55220494
http://osm.org/browse/changeset/55220584
http://osm.org/browse/changeset/55220880
zstadler (2018-01-29 16:33:33+00:00): Hello Павел Гетманцев,
.
Tomorrow will be a week since I've sent you a message.
.
I'm planning to revert this changeset tomorrow unless I hear from you.
zstadler (2018-02-01 07:31:34+00:00): Reverted
fkMohr (2018-01-19 16:14:30+00:00): Wenn ich es richtig sehe, wurden meine Routen-Berichtigung wieder rückgängig gemacht. Der Weg verläuft jetzt wieder so, wie vor vielen Jahren. Das habe ich als Wegemarkierer des Taunusklubs mit dem Forstamt und dem Rhein-Taunus-Klub abgesprochen. So ist inzwischen auch markiert. Lediglich die alten Markierungen sind noch nicht entfernt worden. Daher bitte ich meine Einträge vom Herbst 2017 wieder herzustellen.
alo8 (2018-01-19 18:34:28+00:00): Danke für die aktuelle Information. Verlauf habe ich entsprechend auf die neue Streckenführung zurück korrigiert.
JJIglesias (2018-01-06 23:57:53+00:00): Excelente Edicion. Gracias
user_5359 (2018-01-06 20:20:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Not every object in a park as an address. Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.Please also notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead.
Treestar (2018-01-07 07:34:56+00:00): Whoops, sorry, noted.  Since the address option was there I thought it needed to be added to all. 
I don't understand the part about using key is_in though.
user_5359 (2018-01-07 07:42:00+00:00): The key is_in comes from a time, when the boundaries are not covered everywhere. He is not liked because he offers hardly any structure, but better than assigning an address to an object, that can't receive letters.
FredrikLindseth (2018-01-06 23:18:37+00:00): Var ikke fontenen en rektangulær sak? Gikk forbi i mørket hin dagen. Kan tegne den som et område og tagge den med natural=water, water=pong, amenity=fountain så vises den som fontenen på Ole Bulls plass etc
xqus (2018-01-07 09:13:38+00:00): Den er avlang,og formet som et lyn, på en måte. Deler av den er veldig smal.
Min GPS er ikke nøyaktig nok til å få den 100% riktig, men det skal være ganske bra slik som det er nå. Har tagget den slik som du foreslo.
viloan (2018-01-06 17:57:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
fkMohr (2018-02-10 17:31:58+00:00): Guten Abend,
vor drei Wochen hattest Du beim Taunusklubweg 5 Deine Änderungen nach meinem Hinweis zurückgenommen.
Erst heute bemerke ich, dass beim Taunusklubweg 14 ebenfalls die von mir vorgenommenen Änderungen (Fußweg über Aussichtspunkt) zurückgenommen wurden. Ich habe die Strecke selbst so markiert, weshalb ich um Wiederherstellung bitte.
In diesem Fall bleibt die alte Markierung entlang der Straße zwar noch erhalten (wo Radweg & Nordic-Walking-Strecke verlaufen), doch der Fußweg sollte so markiert sein, wie ich es vorgenommen hatte.
Gruß Friedo
alo8 (2018-02-10 21:14:36+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ist revertiert. Gruß alo8
fkMohr (2018-02-11 17:29:28+00:00): Das kann ich leider nicht sehen; denn derzeit ist nach wie vor Version #65 (von vor einem Monat) aktuell. Bitte auf die v64 zurücksetzen. Der Fußweg verläuft über den  seinerzeit auch neu verzeichneten Aussichtspunkt oberhalb des Bahnhofs und somit westlich des Neufville-Turms.
alo8 (2018-02-11 20:04:06+00:00): sollte jetzt passen...
fkMohr (2018-02-10 18:14:17+00:00): Version #67 war korrekt; leider weiß ich nicht, wie man diese wieder aktivieren kann. Die aktuelle (#68) ist schon lange nicht mehr richtig. 
Ich habe den Weg selbst markiert.
fkMohr (2018-02-10 18:19:03+00:00): Hab mich bei den Versionsnummern vertan:
v67 ist falsch (wieder ältere Führung),
v66 ist richtig (so aktuell in der Natur).
alo8 (2018-02-10 21:13:17+00:00): revertiert auf v66
alo8 (2018-02-11 15:25:18+00:00): @fkMohr: Die Taunusklub Routen 15,21,26,29 laufen in OSM südlich der Bahnlinie d.h. nicht an der Burg vorbei. Ist das nach deinem Wissen so korrekt oder gab es da auch Änderungen?
fkMohr (2018-02-11 16:09:46+00:00): 15 & 21 sind richtig dargestellt, allerdings schon nördlich der Bahn; nur diese zwei laufen noch zwischen B455 und Bahn.
26 & 29 wurden ganz verändert & kommen hier nicht mehr vorbei; sie wurden im Abstieg vertauscht, so dass der gegenläufige Teil entfällt.
Zu Weg 26: v73 war richtig, die derzeitige v75 ist völlig falsch (v74 weiß nicht, wie ich die anschauen kann).
Zu Weg 29: v43 ist falsch, v42 ist von mir und dürfte dann stimmen, doch die wesentlichen Änderungen waren schon vor acht Monaten. Seinerzeit wurde ich von Mapper Kreuzschnabel eingewiesen; die Änderungen wurden auch begründet.
alo8 (2018-02-11 17:03:15+00:00): Weg 26 und 29 habe ich entsprechend angepasst auf v74 / v42.
alo8 (2018-02-11 17:04:21+00:00): Hier eine Übersicht über alle Taunusklub Routen in OSM:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/unr
fkMohr (2018-02-11 18:57:28+00:00): Bei Weg 26 ist derzeit immer noch v75 von vor einem Monat aktuell (richtig war 73, 74 sehe ich nicht).
Auch bei Weg 29 ist weiterhin v43 von vor einem Monat aktuell (sollte dann 42 entsprechen).
Änderungen sind doch normalerweise gleich sichtbar.
alo8 (2018-02-11 20:03:52+00:00): sollte jetzt passen...
Carnildo (2018-01-08 08:28:05+00:00): Is there a reason why you've duplicated a number of existing roads?  A changeset comment of "#msftbusinessapps" isn't very informative.
SafwatHalaby (2018-01-07 23:40:07+00:00): Why was the Wiki tag removed?
Антін Сартенченко (2018-01-15 08:24:17+00:00): При наличии тега ‘wikidata’, наличие десятков тегов ‘wikipedia:<lang>’ не имеет смысла.
zstadler (2018-01-23 08:37:52+00:00): The wikipedia tags are not forbidden or replaced by the wikimedia tag.
zstadler (2021-07-11 22:38:13+00:00): Restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107799825
dudka (2018-01-21 20:52:02+00:00): треба виправити мультиполігон http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7881162#map=19/48.64122/26.02823
Athalis (2018-01-07 00:23:40+00:00): I fixed the name tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55225302. Looks like a bug of MAPS.ME
gendy54 (2018-01-06 23:23:20+00:00): Si tu es sur place, pense à rajouter l'accessibilité handicapé (tag wheelchair) et éventuellement les horaires d'ouverture. Tu peux utiliser cet outil d'Adrien Pavie qui génère la synthaxe http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/