piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2017-03-04 14:30:59+00:00): Hallo ulrichg,

vor drei Monaten hatte ich einen deiner Änderungssatz kommentiert, dir einige Fragen gestellt und dich gebeten, keine Verkehrswege mit Grenzen zu verbinden. Leider hast du die Fragen nicht beantwortet. Im Gegenteil, du hast sogar einfach weitergemacht und mich ignoriert.

Ich möchte dich daher noch einmal bitten, meine Fragen zu beantworten. Auch bei diesem Änderungssatz interessiert mich sehr, warum du die Quelle am Ostufer der Lauter gemappt hast, wo doch die Gewässerfläche der Lauter auch zu Deutschland gehört (aber auch zu Luxemburg).

Solltest du dein Mapping fortsetzen und mir keine Auskünfte erteilen, sehe ich mich genötigt, deine Änderungssätze der letzten Monate zurückzusetzen und/oder eine Sperrung deines Benutzerkontos zu beantragen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2017-03-04 14:31:54+00:00): Das war damals dieser Änderungssatz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43760177
MKnight (2017-02-01 16:58:11+00:00): teilweise revertiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45721310 (überlappende Linien ohne Tags)
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-14 17:01:29+00:00): Hi, you've mapped a lot of cars in this edit. I'm afraid we don't map cars in OSM, they tend to move around ;)
Vincent de Phily (2017-02-01 12:41:23+00:00): See also discussion in http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/483610
majkaz (2017-02-01 15:17:31+00:00): Ahoj, můžeš prosím ty změny dát do samostatného bodu zájmu? Jsou přidané na adresní bod, ten by měl zůstat tak jak je.
Díky.
letihu (2017-02-03 09:14:18+00:00): Sehr gut, dass du Geschwindigkeiten getaggt hast.
Bitte achte darauf, das die Wege weiterhin miteinander verbunden sind.
Ein Routen ich sonst schwer möglich.
Dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98668467/history#map=19/51.22556/9.30172&layers=N
hatte keine Anbindung mehr.
letihu (2017-02-03 09:17:48+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/285465420/history
waren ja sogar alle Wege voneinander getrennt.
iD lässt leider solche Fehler zu. Mit JOSM passiert das nicht.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-03-27 21:04:28+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Marie. Je viens de remarquer que ce changeset contient plus d'une centaines de voies non étiquetées... Saurais-tu nous dire de quoi il s'agit ? Un travail en cours ? Une copie d'écran pour un aperçu: http://i.imgur.com/XbQbqgm.png
majkaz (2017-02-01 15:15:32+00:00): Ahoj, co je s tím přestěhováním? Podle mě tam sice není okresní ředitelství (už je jen krajské na Plavské), ale obvodní oddělení tam pořád ještě zůstává. Nebo se něco změnilo i v tomhle?
surveyor54 (2017-02-01 14:56:29+00:00): revert because the work is very inaccurate, the most tags you use do not match with the aerial image or are illogical
eggie (2017-02-01 17:22:10+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM
"
Ik zie dat je al 20 edits hebt gezet in korte tijd. Wees voorzichtig in het begin en verbouw niet heel de kaart. 
Begin met simpele edits en plaats een tekst erbij waar wij wat mee kunnen. Het is zo onduidelijk wat je doet.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
surveyor54 (2017-02-03 08:41:10+00:00): Hallo,
ich verweise noch einmal aud diesen Kommentar:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45474800
Es ist doch nicht Sinn und Zweck, dass andere user deine Fehler korrigieren müssen.
Gebäude wird mir building=yes getagt
und nicht area=yes

Gruß
surveyor54
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
eda_n (2020-11-05 23:27:00+00:00): leaf_type/leaf_cycle=mixed kane sens per nje pyll apo bashkesi pemesh por jo per peme individuale :  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leaf_type
Nese je dakort do i heq per gjithe Tiranen keto dy atribute pemesh.
mueschel (2017-02-04 15:02:17+00:00): Hallo,
hier ist etwas schiefgegangen, die Wege habe alle keinerlei Tags. Kannst du da nochmal drüberschauen?

Gruß, Jan
Supaplex (2017-02-04 18:56:16+00:00): 這條怪怪的
員集路一段2巷;員集路三段538巷
freebeer (2018-06-11 12:59:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59741382 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info shelter spam
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
eggie (2017-02-01 17:18:07+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM."

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Wees voorzichtig in het verwijderen van edits n.a.v. opmerkingen op de kaart. Die zullen in het veld gecontroleerd moeten worden.

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-01 17:56:23+00:00): The name of the way is really "empty place"?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364000409
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-01 17:55:21+00:00): Hi JJ KIM, welcome to OSM. I guess in your changeset is something wrong. Why did you delete the service way[1] and mapped two ways without further tags[2]?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464445124/history
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471108992 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471108991

For more details see: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45717250
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
tomhukins (2021-12-06 15:23:46+00:00): Hi, I noticed this is tagged with the name "Woolsone" but I suspect it should be "Woolstone"
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
samely (2017-02-03 19:36:19+00:00): Hi sody134, thanks for contributing to OSM, you made a great job, I just deleted some wrong features and re-tagged ways.

Regards,
Eliane
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
streckenkundler (2017-02-01 15:34:06+00:00): Why do you record not your changes to the Forum or the mailing list? I miss a list of proposed changes since changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44987328

All massive changes on trees are not discussed!!!
FrViPofm (2017-02-01 17:20:29+00:00): Hi,
I've been very active in the past on mailing lists, mainly in French, but also in English, a pity, never in German.
But I'm a little tired of talking today : what can I do with that : https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958

It seemed to me obvious that normalizing the names in e.g. the bad import of Bucarest (All names in capital letters : QUERCUS ROBUR -> Quercus robur), or in an other bad import (QRo -> Quercus robur), or this other one (genus=Quercus, species=Robur -> Quercus robur) decreasing the number of variants of the same species (quercus robur, Quercus Robur, quercus_robur, Q. robur... -> Quercus robur; Tilia x europaea, tilia x europaea, Tilia X europaea, Tilia europaea, tilia europaea, tilia europea, Tilia Europaea, T. europaea, TILIA EUROPAEA...  -> Tilia × europaea; Coconut, coconut trees, Coconut palm, cocos nucifera, cocos nuciferra, Cocos Nucifera... -> Cocos nucifera; names given in Japanese, Korean -> species:ja, species:ko and normalized name in species) would strengthen the database, and make the species tag a little more useful. And there is still too much to be done.

Mechanical ? Oh, yes ! I just have written a little script in python that eliminate the normalized forms from all the values of the species tag. It does not even sort this list. All is hand made : searching the web, downloading the objects, changing the values, uploading. A very, very big job...
If it had been mechanized, it would certainly have been much more verbose in the comments.

OK, those minor changes (one tag affected, often one letter, only) affect sometimes numerous points, and all over the world..
OK, I have grouped the upload at the beginning with very few explanations (it seemed to me so obvious : see http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2130090721/history or http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2828044480/history ).

I've been blocked. OK. I accept it.
Some changesets have been reverted by Stereo_repair, saying : "Reverted mechanical edit..." referring to a German discussion. Let me say that he worked stupidly. Look at, for example, in this changeset : http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45691307 , the history of http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3546927/history 
Or http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/521397711/history ... It is obvious that the changeset was not mechanical... And that some asked for a revert a little to fast. And that Stereo did it without more sight.

No discussion ? Where is the discussion I could take part before blocking ? Before reverting ? Witch mail ?
Easy to say what is wrong... Did somebody noticed the improvement of the database (I cant understand the German) ?
I'm tired now...
streckenkundler (2017-02-01 21:03:31+00:00): Good evening...

Ok, the child fell into the well... (german proverb).

Also I have great interest, that the plants name are correct. Your idea was very good.
Let us sort it. 
First of all: please write the changes that you've written here, also o a new site in a table at the OSM-WIKI with corresponding links. Please document any future changes to this page.
Send a link to the site to the mailinglist and the best here and to me.
Least a please to changesetcomment:  write here exactly the content: e.g. 
change "quercus robur, Quercus Robur, quercus_robur, Q. robur... to Quercus robur" or similar.

Supplementary:
Here a change which I have problems:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2130264647/history

In the history we have the genus Platanus but we don't have the species platanus × hispanica. We have only the name:it. In my opinion a local name is not enough for the species-Tag

Finally the name with the following pages should be reconciled:
http://www.ipni.org/ipni/plantnamesearchpage.do
and/or 
http://www.theplantlist.org/
These should also be documented with a link to the main-site.

Strictly speaking, the name should be written always with name author: e.g. Platanus × acerifolia ( Aiton ) Willd.

Thank you for your comment. We get it already on the right track.

Sven
FrViPofm (2017-02-01 21:33:33+00:00): My mistake may come from :
species:it =Platano comune

and https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platane_commun that say : Platanus ×hispanica

But also https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platanus gives : Platanus acerifolia (Aiton) Willd. - platano comune
FrViPofm (2017-02-01 21:38:03+00:00): And more : in the Bologna import, the (usualy) 3 letters value of species tag is an abbreviation of the binomial name. So Pla = *Pl*atanus *a*cerifolia = Platanus × hispanica
Stereo (2017-02-02 17:35:48+00:00): Bonjour FrViPofm,

Si tu veux, on peut parler en Français et/ou en privé.

I'm delighted to see that a conversation has begun. Your massive edits aren't a bad idea, and I hope that you won't let the DWG's block discourage you.

You *must absolutely* discuss these massive edits first, especially to avoid this kind of mistakes.

Please get in touch with the DWG when you're ready to do that, and we'll be happy to unblock you.

Happy mapping,

Guillaume
streckenkundler (2017-02-02 20:39:19+00:00): Good evening  FrViPofm.

I think it is quite important that you write the documentation. That brings peace and others know what you've done. Is it not more.

The genus Platanus....

I think the genus Platanus seems to be a very specific genus with various errors in the names of plants. 

There are recovery sayings between http://www.ipni.org/ipni/advPlantNameSearch.do?find_family=&find_genus=Platanus and http://www.theplantlist.org/1.1/browse/A/Platanaceae/Platanus/

At the moment, I think  Platanus acerifolia (Aiton) Willd. is the accepted name. Synonym names are  Platanus hispanica Münchh.	 or  Platanus × hispanica Mill. ex Münchh. or Platanus hispanicus Münchh. 
You can see the names on the website-links. 

But i'm not really sure what make the taxonomists.

Finally, it shows the general problem of the name. I don't see a real solution. One can however use a name and set a link to wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q161374
e.g. species:wikidata=Q161374

greetings,

Sven
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 11:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45852519 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Commodoortje (2017-02-01 16:52:56+00:00): Hallo en welkom op OpenStreetMap!
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken. Het is de bedoeling dat de werkelijkheid in kaart wordt gebracht. Ook een Pokemon speler kan waardevolle data inbrengen, mits deze voldoen aan de werkelijkheid. Uw edit zal gecontroleerd worden op vandalisme en zal om deze reden teruggedraaid kunnen worden.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-02-01 16:54:10+00:00): Revert due to Pokemon vandalism
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45721277
Mocht je vragen krijgen neem dan even contact met me op.
eggie (2017-02-24 13:31:05+00:00): Stoopy,

Je zet in hoog tempo landuse=grass om in leisure=park. Een echt park ligt als een deken over de landuse heen. Veel details gaan zo verloren en zijn een verarming voor de kaart. wat is de reden dat je dit doet?
eggie (2017-02-24 13:52:38+00:00): Je laatste drie changesets heb ik teruggedraaid. Je zet het fietspaden om naar voetpaden. Wil je meer weten dan kun je gerust reageren.
eggie (2017-02-24 15:12:30+00:00): De situatie bij het Oranje Bastion heb ik aangepast net als de nieuwe situatie aan de Rembrandtlaan.
Je hebt ook goede edits gedaan. 
Het pad achterlangs de plas bij de watertoren is bij mijn weten gewoon een fietspad. De fietspaden hier heb ik een tijd geleden al aangepast na survey. 
Wanneer je niet zeker bent van je edits neem dan svp contact op met de voorgaande mapper.
Echte parken kun je gewoon los over de landuse heenleggen en het park vervolgens een naam geven.
eggie (2017-03-04 10:56:38+00:00): Beste Guinness, 
Er staat wat commentaar op je edits van de laatste dagen waarbij de toch de landuse=grass weer omzet in Leisure=park. Het Park Achter de Hoeven heb ik als voorbeeld weer opnieuw getagd.
Het is al eerder gezegd.
De Leisure=park ligt als een deken over de landuse=grass heen. 
De wandelroute langs de Donge had je de tag highway verwijderd. Die heb ik als highway=track er weer opgezet. Nu was hij helaas verdwenen van de kaart.
OSM is een samenwerkingsproject. Join the forum and introduce yourself. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
yurasi (2017-02-07 14:51:45+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. The highway=footway isn't visible with Bing imagery satellite. I've deleted this. 
Greetings.
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
literan (2017-02-02 13:01:22+00:00): отлично, теперь другое дело!
Stereo_repair (2017-02-04 10:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45800694 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
samely (2017-02-02 19:38:00+00:00): Hi On Top, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around and found an island trace, can you please fix this, and add the relation to the existing street?

Regards,
Eliane
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-13 19:04:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48656854 where the changeset comment is: Revert HourOftheWulf imports/mechanical edits after multiple complaints from Dutch community, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1347
Stereo_repair (2017-02-04 09:53:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45798879 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 12:08:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45853882 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Commodoortje (2017-02-01 16:45:57+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-02-01 16:51:28+00:00): Kijk nog even naar je changeset
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45718560
Kun je uitleggen wat je wilde doen?
Er staan namelijk een aantal wazige edits in, vermoedelijk zijn dit vergissingen die per ongeluk opgeslagen zijn.
sebastic (2017-02-12 12:43:43+00:00): De name tag voor de woonplaatsgrens relatie is gecorrigeerd.
Stereo_repair (2017-02-04 10:08:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45800694 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 04:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45838308 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-07 02:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45854666 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
Stereo_repair (2017-02-07 03:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45872554 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
mavl (2019-01-03 16:08:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:10:54+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
mavl (2019-01-03 16:08:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
eggie (2017-02-01 17:31:14+00:00): Beste Fuipig,
In editor ID zit een hardnekkige fout. je krijgt bij een highway=footway gratis footway=side_walk erbij. Dat laatste kun je het beste weghalen. Dat is alleen om aan te geven dat er voetpaden langs een autoweg lopen. 
Klik op de link voor reactie
Martin Borsje (2017-02-01 17:51:37+00:00): Beste Fuipig

Welkom op OSM, maar je blijft Pokemon edits te doen die niet of niet geheel met de werkelijk overeenkomen, wil je dit niet doen en je eerst verdiepen in OSM.

Je wijzigingen zullen teruggedraaid worden.
Commodoortje (2017-02-01 20:36:55+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
PT-53 (2017-02-04 09:07:38+00:00): Hallo Wandermagie,
Du hast bei Deiner Namens-Eintragung versehentlich das Attribut historic=wayside_shrine gelöscht. Ich habe das Attribut wieder eingetragen, da ein Name-Eintrag alleine nicht ausreicht.
Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-05 19:19:53+00:00): Hi dlebauer, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
dlebauer (2017-02-05 20:22:47+00:00): Sorry - 

I removed one polygon at this site in Changeset #45839090 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45719251

Does that change revert this one? Or could you please delete? I'll look at the dev server, thank you.
Stereo_repair (2017-02-04 09:53:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45798879 where the changeset comment is: Reverted mechanical edit of species tag to trees after complaints to DWG, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=628958
mavl (2019-01-03 16:08:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
GinaroZ (2017-02-02 23:33:56+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've removed the unconnected footpaths that you added.
For sidewalks that are attached to the road, you are probably better tagging them as sidewalk=left/right/both on the roads.
Also, if you do add paths in the future, make sure they are connected at one or both ends :)
majkaz (2017-02-01 17:25:37+00:00): Ahoj,
nebylo by lepší ty chodníky u ulic jen označit na cestě ulice tagem sidewalk=left/right/both?
Jsou momentálně k ničemu nepřipojené, takže pro pěší navigaci nepoužitelné.
Nemyslím tím ty, kde to jde parkem nebo výrazně jinak než ulice, ale klasické chodníky jen oddělené obrubníkem.
Baloo Uriza (2017-02-01 17:55:08+00:00): This park does not exist.  Please don't vandalize the map.
Baloo Uriza (2017-02-01 17:55:26+00:00): Names are not descriptions.
Baloo Uriza (2017-02-01 17:56:15+00:00): Do more of this, where you added something that exists.
mavl (2019-01-03 16:08:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-03 16:08:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
FreedSky (2017-02-09 08:14:54+00:00): 服了你 车站名称你搞什么