piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2022-02-24 05:09:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the OSM key for a road is highway. Please ntice also you paint the ways over existing ways. I found also a lot of duplicate buildings in your area. Did you load the data before you draw?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
eggie (2022-02-24 08:14:49+00:00): Dag Noud...
Beter niet schuiven met de kaart met editor iD.. Dat kan soms flink verkeerd gaan door onbedoelde verlaatsingen van objecten.

leisure=swimming_pool uitsluitend gebruiken voor de bak met water.

Gebruik leisure=sports_centre met sport=swimming.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre

en zie ook voor de bak met water.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117789727

Mapse
eggie
Noud Speijcken (2022-02-24 08:47:39+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Bedankt voor de feedback weer. Heb ik dan toch iets verschoven? Ik zag dat het zwembad op de kaart niet met de imagery matchte, maar ben daar vanaf gebleven. Ik heb toen in de commit gekeken of er iets anders in stond dan de twee nieuwe nodes en de tags en toen dat niet zo was vond ik het veilig, is dat niet zo?

Ik had de zwembad tag op de "Kaartelementen" wiki opgezocht, daar staat het advies dat ik gebruikt heb. Maar als ik dan naar de tag wiki zelf ga zie ik inderdaad "water area only". Dus die is eigenlijk alleen maar nuttig als het een buitenbad is (anders zit er als het goed is een sports_centre omheen)?

Groeten,

Noud (nickname was nog van lang geleden).
eggie (2022-02-24 09:05:18+00:00): Yep.. goed gezien...  Voor een buitenbad of een privezwembad.

Het is in het begin allemaal rijstebrij, maar als je langer bezig bent dan zit de kennis uiteindelijk in je 'hoofd'.  
Vooral in het begin is de wiki raadplegen belangrijk.... en ook de wiki wordt nogal eens aangepast.

Je hebt niets verschoven. 
Schade ontstaat als je iets selecteert met de linker muis en dan gaat schuivem met diezelfde muisknop. 
Wanneer je doorzet kijk dan eens naar de beter editor JOSM  voordat je te veel went aan editor iD.

In josm schuif je met de rechtermuis en selecteer je met links. Aan JOSM zul je toch niet ontkomen. Beter direct schwitchen.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

Maar up to you..
eggie
Noud Speijcken (2022-02-24 11:34:16+00:00): Ik heb het zwembad gefixed in 117802310.

Ik heb al wat tutorials gekeken van JOSM en een eerste HOT actie ermee gedaan (117789119). 

Voor tagging is voor nu iD handiger, voor de andere dingen ben ik met JOSM aan het oefenen.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 06:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123420275.
Lee Carré (2022-02-24 12:08:19+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
eggie (2022-02-24 07:47:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
WoodWoseWulf (2022-02-24 02:26:30+00:00): Hi!
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034648283 as a park - it looks like some kind of structure? Maybe a covered pavilion or some kind of sports pitch? I'm not sure if park would be the best way to describe it.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-25 20:08:48+00:00): Hi 
Service roads should not be deleted for parking lots since parking lots are not routable features. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117791347
user_5359 (2022-03-18 12:01:22+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367682459. 
What is the meaning of the tags
Ambito=Estatal
CCT=15EPR0191E
CCT TV=15DP122065W
Tipo=Primaria
Did you know that there is a key to describe the country-specific school types?
school:<country code> (here school:MX) 

May I also ask you for support on the question of the meaning of CCT, CCT TM and CCT TV. Currently we have the following keys in the database. 
CCT (92) 
cct (35)
CCT T.M (4)
CCT TM (3)
cctv (12)
CCT TV (7)
CCT T.V (3)
CCT T.V (2)
mrpulley (2024-02-15 09:41:29+00:00): Could you confirm the source for the maxspeed change? Was it the NSW Speed data used in later edits?
Harsimranjit Kaur (2024-02-15 23:08:57+00:00): This was updated based on the information provided by someone local to this area.
mrpulley (2024-02-19 09:19:34+00:00): Can you provide some more info on this (as there are edits all over NSW based on information provided to you). How is the information provided? Is the information coming to you directly, or are you working for a company? Is this information being checked prior to uploading? Thanks.
Harsimranjit Kaur (2024-02-19 22:09:29+00:00): I work for a company and follow these steps before making any edits:

1. A person reports that the speed limit on a particular road segment is incorrectly recorded (e.g. 50 km/h), but they know from driving in that area that the actual speed limit is different (e.g.60 km/h) according to the posted speed limit signs.
2. Information is verified; if correct, it comes to me.
3. I download the latest speed data from https://opendata.transport.nsw.gov.au/ (NSW Speed Data) periodically.
4. I check if the claimed speed limit matches NSW Speed Data; if yes, I make edits in OpenStreetMaps. If not, no changes are made.
5.  If multiple people from the area claim a different speed limit than the one in the NSW Speed Data, and provide evidence such as picture of speed limit signs along with geolocation, I make edits in OpenStreetMaps.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-25 19:44:32+00:00): You changed the boundary of Grass Valley to a rail feature. I'm assuming this was a mistake.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117791429
ottwiz (2022-02-24 00:03:36+00:00): By the way, I fixed up some multipolygon problems like overlapping or unclosed way or "area=yes" on wooded multipolygons when it's not needed.
RunTrails (2022-02-25 02:23:12+00:00): Most of this is in the GW National Forest which is owned and managed by the Dept of Agriculture as actual wood crop. So you're free to split out the non-DoAg stuff as Wood if you know the land ownership. Otherwise I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish.
ottwiz (2022-02-25 07:59:31+00:00): Okay maybe you're right in this case but all of the taggings here, even in Shenandoah National Park and Jefferson National Forest is natural=wood.
(btw the fact we have landuse=forest and natural=wood is confusing)
The thing I'm doing is to reduce the amount of landuse=forest ways if it's unnecessary, to keep the numbers down in ohsome.org's dashboard calculator, since you can generate reports such as wood area by tagging (landuse=forest and natural=wood). Before this, WV had ~16-17 thousand km2 of natural=wood, ~1,5k km2 of landuse=forest tagged ways, relations. Now this 1,5k km2 has decreased significantly to around 400-500 km2 I assume which is great (since in JOSM i have a plugin for calculating ways - measurement)

I just like matching up the tagging. In my opinion, I only tag stuff as landuse=forest if it clearly shows that it's been under forestry like forests in Alabama(however I got told from asdfjkll that they're tagging everything there as natural=wood), or I know the exact border of the forest section, for example, in Hungary it's easy because we have named mountain ranges where we also associate the forest boundary with it so that is actually aligning to the forest boundary.
However, in the US it's not the same, because most of the forests are not touched and they're in massive amounts, even if they're operated by DoA or similar authorities. As I checked all over in Virginia, natural=wood is used everywhere, so this is why I changed the tagging. I hope now this makes everything clear.
(and I remember once being told to use natural=wood but that was waaay back in 2020)
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-24 10:21:46+00:00): Ciao. Cos'è l'edificio che hai inserito? E' una cappella? E' un pilone votivo? Il name non è corretto perché è descrittivo. Il tipo di edificio è generico e dovrebbe essere specificato meglio. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117791786
ehsan shaabani4 (2022-02-24 01:05:52+00:00): https://www.ehsan-shaabani.ir/
ehsan shaabani4 (2022-02-24 01:07:12+00:00): https://www.instagram.com/ehsan_shaabanii/
kyy0602 (2022-02-24 00:55:08+00:00): *Centre on Barton
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-24 07:24:06+00:00): Damn you fixed that trail access just before I discovered it lol.
Anyways keep up the good work in the area.👍
AngocA (2022-02-27 23:19:02+00:00): Modificaste solo un segmente de la calle 85. Pero debería ser consistente con toda la avenida, o si no es como tal una avenida, entonces, que toda la Calle 85 se le quitara. No solo una parte.
SekeRob (2022-02-24 10:47:11+00:00): Hi,

You saved this change set which produced 2 warnings. 1) 2 nodes top of each other without connecting them and a line without tags. Added the unmaintained way value but if it is truly a sentiero than it needs to be changed to path (stretta). The way also crosses a stream, presumed to be a 'ford'. Can not see in imagery if there is a bridge but highly doubtful. The corrections you find in Change Set https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117806141

ciao.
kylor (2022-02-24 02:08:21+00:00): I totally admit I completely buffered the spelling on this.
indigomc (2022-04-18 08:36:52+00:00): Please do not removed valid information. Use 'English' (you mean the Latin script) may be standard practice but you need to retain the existing data. Please change these in future to name:ml if you fell it necessary, but deleting it is against policy.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:31:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:31:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
gscholz (2022-02-25 05:25:20+00:00): Hi Dartmouthmapmaker,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-63.70621&lat=44.70305&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117794294

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
SomeoneElse (2022-02-27 11:09:22+00:00): Hello again Mikhail1412,

As mentioned many times previously, there are still questions for you to answer at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2055614 .
Best Regards,
Andy
mavl (2022-05-20 15:30:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-02-24 05:23:54+00:00): Hello! Please notice we use the twenty four hours notation.
Frans S (2022-02-27 09:32:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please tag all buildings as building=yes.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117796186
BCNorwich (2022-02-24 08:02:10+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and well done for your first edit of the database.

I'd like to point you to some info intended to guide OSM editing:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness   this page implies the test for smoothness=impassable is that no 4WD vehicle can proceed. Clearly not the case here as the track shows evidence of vehicular use in the imagery. The tag tracktype=grade5 describes to surface and thus the probable surface smoothness as detailed here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype   I would have thought bikes designed for off-road use (which this is), would have no problems.  Thus I've removed that tag. 

I've reinstated the bicycle tag as bicycle=designated, cycling is a legally designated form of access on this track. It's a byway open to all traffic, BOAT.

Please don't be deterred from editing, there's just a lot to it.

Regards Bernard.
Richmarg (2022-02-24 08:25:41+00:00): Thanks for this. It’s my first edit so grateful for general advice. 
However, despite it’s BOAT status it’s very doubtful if any 4D vehicle could use it in it’s present condition. I’m not sure what imagery you’re referring to, Google Earth, or similar? I’ve just looked, imagery dated 22/04/21, where I agree it looks well used. On the ground however it’s very different (regretting I didn’t take photos).
Two problems arise for me.
As a public right of way I’m not sure what is expected from a BOAT. Perhaps you can advise further? But it should be signed as a minimum and it isn’t. I’ve reported this omission to Cambridgeshire CC, not that I’m expecting them to do much about it.
Secondly, and more importantly for cyclists, I am attempting to remedy this track being suggested by cycle travel (https://cycle.travel) as a viable cycle route. 
Now that you’ve removed the tag, I’m not sure how I can do that. Any advice gratefully received.
BCNorwich (2022-02-24 10:28:26+00:00): Hi, First while fresh in my mind, as of 7th Dec 2021 (last cycle-travel data update), this track was described by them as  "rough unpaved trail Docking's Lane", depending on your point of view that's correct. So folk using the track would now its probable condition in certain conditions. You can add notes to sections of a route in cycle-travel but I don't know if the note is visible/accessible to other users. (I've now added surface=grass as cycle-travel takes surface into consideration.)

A Byway Open to All Traffic is legally what it says, a highway open to all forms of traffic no matter the condition of the highway. The track can be seen in the Bing, Maxar, Esri, and Mapbox imagery. If a 

Whats can legally be expected of a public RoW is described under the section "Maintaining and protecting public rights of way" here:- https://www.gov.uk/guidance/public-rights-of-way-local-authority-responsibilities#maintaining-and-protecting-public-rights-of-way   Though what you find on the ground is often a very different matter. Your reporting to the council is commendable, I wish you luck!

Discouraging a way is subjective and not really something that can be accurately described in OSM. This way will likely be very different in the summer. Anyone might easily use it one day but not the next.

Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2022-03-08 09:53:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9531519145. What is the meaning of the tag PSGC_code=074623009? Did you mean something like ref:PH:...
chaelo86 (2022-03-09 08:27:35+00:00): Yes
chaelo86 (2022-03-09 08:46:54+00:00): I'll update the tags
felipeeugenio (2022-02-24 18:10:50+00:00): Hola. Es un lugar para alojarse este?
mavl (2022-05-20 15:31:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
felipeeugenio (2022-02-24 18:11:26+00:00): Hola. por favor no usar nombres descriptivos. saludos
Fidosup (2022-02-24 18:43:31+00:00): Hola Felipe, que tal.
Si, es  Alojamiento.
Estaba intentando que las indicaciones entre 2 puntos me llevara hasta allá por el camino indicado. Ya que indica entrar por Camino al Volcan y en realidad no es posible, por lo que estaba intentando que tomara la ruta correcta. Pero al parecer sigue sin hacerlo.
felipeeugenio (2022-02-24 18:52:23+00:00): Hola. ok. Tienes que esperar. no se reflejan inmediatamente los cambios. En todo caso si estás usando un navegador, ya es un asunto de éste.

Me dices que el camino por el Camino al volcán no es posible porque no se puede. Es porque la conexión no existe(porque si se ve en el satelite) o porque hay un portón y hay que dar la vuelta? yo puedo arreglartelo, pero necesito que seas especifico.

no mapeamos para que se llegue a los lugares de una manera, se mapea lo que hay en terreno. Ahora, si el camino es privado por un lado puedo agregar eso.
saludos
Fidosup (2022-02-24 18:56:23+00:00): Gracias Felipe por tu respuesta. Es porque por el camino hay un murallón... No hay paso hacia el camino de acceso a los Domos. Solo se puede acceder desde el Norte.
felipeeugenio (2022-02-24 19:00:25+00:00): el murallón es una barrera jersey (de esas que hay en la carretera) y no te puedes ni salir del camino?
o puedes entrar a ese predio y luego no tienes como pasar?
felipeeugenio (2022-02-24 19:02:54+00:00): dale a una mirada con el editor para que veas como lo dejé y me dices si interpreté bien.
saludos
Fidosup (2022-02-24 19:09:55+00:00): En el punto de conexión dentro del cuadro seleccionado, hay un portón de acceso privado de los departamentos. No es público. De ahí hacia el sur es el acceso a los Domos, y es el único acceso, ya que aparece una salida hacia Camino al Volcan casi frente a los Domos, que no existe, ya que haí hay un murallón continuo, ya que eso es parte del condominio que da a camino al Volcan que es cerrado.
felipeeugenio (2022-02-24 19:24:40+00:00): vale. revisa como lo hice y me cuentas
Fidosup (2022-02-24 19:45:21+00:00): Felipe, revisa por favor lo que modifiqué. Eso es en la práctica. Muchas gracias.
Fidosup (2022-02-24 19:47:39+00:00): Vi lo que modificaste con Map Data seleccionado, y lo edité según lo que hay. Revísalo por favor. Muchas gracias.
felipeeugenio (2022-02-24 19:55:51+00:00): vale, quedó bien.
saludos
Fidosup (2022-02-24 19:57:45+00:00): Muchas gracias. Un abrazo.
user_12328418 (2022-03-17 16:36:45+00:00): leisure=park no2 ist ein falscher Wert:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
eventuell ist name=park no2 richtig - mit richtiger Rechtschreibung - und wenn er so mit Schild ausgezeichnet ist.
legofahrrad (2022-04-10 21:22:53+00:00): Hallo FreiTal,
meinst du wirklich, dass dich hier in Indien jemand auf deutsch verstehen wird? 😅
Beste Grüße aus Deutschland! :)
yellowsoar (2022-03-24 15:23:31+00:00): Please use life cycle prefix for POI editing instead of deleting it.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Lifecycle_prefix_.28.3Cstatus.3E:.3Ckey.3E_.3D_.3Cvalue.3E.29
mavl (2022-05-20 15:30:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-02-26 07:10:46+00:00): Hello, Why did you add the tag AAAAAAAAAAAAA? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034699395/history ?
asibwene_ImportAccount (2022-03-08 07:03:12+00:00): sorry that tag was added unintentional 
thanks for solving that..!
user4816003805 (2022-03-22 17:17:48+00:00): Nice job adding the statues.
Also surprised no one had added it. =)
For the Pappy statue, I think you should probably use "subject:wikipedia" rather than "wikipedia", as the Wikipedia article is about the subject, not the statue itself.
An example of this distinction would be https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2496738466
madcartographer (2022-03-23 07:43:29+00:00): Hey, appreciate the heads-up! You learn something new every day with the OSM community :) Tagging is now fixed.
Warin61 (2022-02-25 07:36:34+00:00): Hi,
This is where you could have added a gate and the tag access=private to the western side of this track.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-24 07:31:53+00:00): Did you mean to add this barrier in Germany.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9531600808
Lee Carré (2022-02-24 12:07:43+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Within OsmAnd, you can selectively upload changes. Doing so by region whom reduce the size of changeset bounding boxes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SekeRob (2022-02-24 20:16:23+00:00): san Mauro o San Mauro ;?
ivanbranco (2022-02-24 22:24:04+00:00): Inoltre non è un duplicato di questo place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3924012841 ?
Emanuele C96 (2022-02-25 13:52:46+00:00): Ciao, è l'unico nome che ho trovato con cui è possibile denominare la zona, al contrario di quello precedente che era sbagliato 
In alternativa sarebbe forse più corretto togliere il nome da questo punto e considerarlo "accorpato" a San Mauro
mavl (2022-02-24 09:19:02+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted. There is no so country in this place.
tom_yorados (2022-02-24 19:11:42+00:00): Hi,
bitte vergib immer einen kurzen Kommentar, der Deine Änderungen beschreibt.

Viele Grüße
aweech (2022-02-27 02:26:38+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I reviewed your edit, as you requested, and it looks like this building was demolished when the traffic circle was built.
canfe (2022-02-24 09:30:11+00:00): But now the parking lot has a strange shape compared to the one I drew: it has a nonsense "needle".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117799890
mirikaaa (2022-04-27 13:49:02+00:00): Hi, canfe! Thank you for writing about this issue. "needle" already fixed, mapping was done based on Bing aerial imagery. In the future, we will be more attentive to such edits and expand our knowledge of mapping. Best Regards,Mapbox.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117799890
eggie (2022-02-24 08:01:13+00:00): Dag jhnijman,
Daar is nog veel werk aan de winkel.
Het wordt wel beter zo. 
Ik heb de brug weer losgemaakt van het water.. 

Het voetpad heb ik via een trap laten lopen naar de Archangel. Je zou het als voorbeeld kunnen gebruiken voor andere bruggen. 
De eindnodes van het wegdeel zitten nu vast aan de man_made=bridge. 
Onder de brug ligt gewoon een watervlak.

Mapse,
eggie
DENelson83 (2022-03-03 07:10:20+00:00): Let it be noted that I personally object to giving more than one name to a single point on the sea.  I may not be able to get anyone to agree with this, but it is my own personal objection.
Josef73 (2022-07-01 19:49:33+00:00): Befindet sich der Defi im Haus? Dann bitte die Koordinaten anpassen. Danke.
kakiremora (2022-03-30 16:45:21+00:00): Witam,
Czy "otwarcie" ulicy Jana Pawła II było zamierzone? Ulica nadal ma tag construction.

Pozdrawiam
adas (2022-03-31 08:03:36+00:00): tak, zamierzone. Droga otwarta juz. Usunąłem ten tag.
eggie (2022-02-24 09:52:16+00:00): Welkom bij OSM...

Alleen een naam zal niet doen in OSM. Ook de aard van het bedrijf bijtaggen.
Eigen bedrijf toevoegen 

https://www.onosm.org/ 

en 

 

https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/11/46.87897/8.23975 

 

En video 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6edDUi1o9RA 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-24 10:18:42+00:00): De tagging heb ik aangevuld/ phone/website/openingstijden/ ..  zodat het straks rendert.
MVG
eggie
mavl (2022-05-20 15:30:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-24 10:36:44+00:00): 1. Don't use `highway=` directly on not yet existing features
2. More descriptive changeset comments please
bxl-forever (2022-02-25 00:25:58+00:00): Hello,
How is "capacity:cargo_bike=1" calculated?  It’s not immediately apparent when looking at the pictures.