piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
canfe (2021-05-30 15:27:50+00:00): Andando oltre nella via Google si vedono vecchie targhe marmoree con Carlo.
Bel mistero
osmviborg (2019-09-10 19:54:11+00:00): Please don't touch the address nodes.
felipeeugenio (2019-09-11 20:23:52+00:00): por favor no poner nombres genericos. solo nombre real
mavl (2019-12-21 16:04:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78713278, 78715571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
archie (2019-09-10 20:18:06+00:00): Hej, Den källa du anger här (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499139505), är den inte upphovsrättsligt skyddad? Jag har alltid utgått från det.
Riggwelter (2019-09-11 10:33:18+00:00): Att använda Lantmäteriets kartdatabas för att verifiera en vägs sträckning och/eller ortsnamn berörs inte av upphovsrättslagstiftningen. Vidare är Lantmäteriets öppna geodata numer fria under CC0, se https://www.lantmateriet.se/sv/Kartor-och-geografisk-information/oppna-data/
archie (2019-09-11 10:56:01+00:00): Ja, det är självklart att det är fritt att använda  den källan du angav för verifikation, men det är väl en skillnad att hänvisa till den som ursprung (källan). Är det helt säkert att https://kso.etjanster.lantmateriet.se/ omfattas av "Lantmäteriets öppna geodata"? Jag bara undrar, för det skulle ju förenkla editeringen en hel del.
Riggwelter (2019-09-11 11:41:25+00:00): Å ena sidan kan man använda taggen source=* för att visa att man lagt till metadata, d.v.s. geodata (i.a.f. enligt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source). Man kan också använda taggen source=* för att underlätta verifikation, vilket också är möjligt enligt samma artikel på wikin (och vilket är det sätt jag har valt att använda det på). Möjligen skulle man kunna utveckla angivandet av källa genom att skriva "Source: map survey via https://kso.etjanster.lantmateriet.se/", om man vill försöka klargöra att det inte i första hand är metadata, utan kartrekognoscering. Jag tror inte att jag sett någon detaljdiskussion kring det någonstans. Ett exempel på öppna geodata från LM är ju att vi numer kan använda vissa topografiska kartor som bakgrund då vi ritar, och det är ju positivt!
viloan (2019-09-10 18:25:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
tux67 (2019-09-11 07:55:51+00:00): Habs ein wenig nach Osten verschoben (siehe Mapillary) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=t_cEvWjwajD0p4ct-dpnJQ&focus=photo&lat=51.376762&lng=7.207991&z=17
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74325067
jonrellim (2019-09-10 18:33:05+00:00): Deze 'verbouwingen' gaan in fases uitgevoerd worden, dus de buslijnen worden ruim een jaar omgeleid. voor precieze lijnroute zie https://reizen.keolis.nl/nl/twents/lijnen/4061 en https://reizen.keolis.nl/nl/twents/lijnen/4064
km2bp (2019-09-10 18:36:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/km2bp/traces/3060444 + Dodanie zdjęć   http://openpoimap.org/?map=various&zoom=16&lat=52.14466&lon=15.40362&layers=B00FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFF
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
mavl (2019-12-21 16:04:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78713278, 78715571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
ma-rt-in (2019-09-11 09:04:20+00:00): Hallo,
warst du vor Ort und hast geprüft, ob es den Laden noch gibt. Manchmal kann das nicht mehr aufrufen einer Website sowas bedeuten.
vg
hendrik-17 (2019-09-11 16:49:14+00:00): Moin ma-rt-in,

nein, ich war in diesem Fall nicht vor Ort.
In der Regel verzichte ich dann auch darauf, Änderungen an Objekten vorzunehmen, von denen ich nicht genau weiß, ob und wie sie noch existieren. (In der Versionshistorie würde das sonst evtl. so aussehen, als ob das Objekt zum Zeitpunkt meiner Bearbeitung noch sicher existiterte.)

In diesem Fall habe ich den Website-Tag aber trotzdem entfernt, da er dem Anschein nach auch schon zum Zeitpunkt des Hinzufügens nicht zu diesem Laden zu passen schien. (https://web.archive.org/web/20181125060022/http://www.sultans-kebap.de:80/)

Aber ich gebe dir Recht, besser wäre es gewesen, den Laden vor Ort zu überprüfen.

Beste Grüße
hendrik-17
hendrik-17 (2019-09-28 20:33:19+00:00): Hab's vor Ort überprüft, der Laden existiert noch.
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
mavl (2019-12-21 16:04:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78713278, 78715571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
tux67 (2019-09-11 07:41:08+00:00): Hi Hoppala,
sieht gut aus - nur würde ich statt website=... das tag contact:facebook verwenden.
(Soll ich das ändern oder möchtest du?)
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74325826
BCNorwich (2019-09-11 08:01:42+00:00): Hi, It looks like you have deleted a lot of service roads and footpaths in this changeset, as well as making your amendments.
You might want to revert and start again, need help reverting please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2019-09-10 20:35:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mavl (2019-12-21 16:04:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78713278, 78715571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Frans S (2019-09-11 10:07:02+00:00): Hello Soray,
Thanks for mapping here.
A remark.  After you mapped highways you mapped also Farmland areas. (not required on this project) If you do so, Please do not let the nodes connect to the highways. This gives always an error. 
GPS driven Navsystems cannot handle  this,
Best regards
Frans S (2019-09-11 10:16:25+00:00): Hello Soray
Another issue. Please do not tag roads in the field  of farm areas as "unclassified""  Track or service should be a better tag. I change them
Best regards
mueschel (2019-09-17 09:36:01+00:00): Hi,
I found a few ways with strange tags like this one - could you check and fix this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723566775
ChristianA (2019-09-22 06:22:51+00:00): Hej. I was travelling last week so I could not fix it then. But now it seems you have solved it; thanks.
user_5359 (2019-09-10 20:39:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
tux67 (2019-09-11 07:22:15+00:00): Hi ivvpw,
du hast beim Hochladen des Changesets keine Quelle angegeben (wäre immer wünschenswert) - ich nehme an die Löschungen und folgenden Änderungen basieren auf eigener Ortskenntnis?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74326576
trailschneck (2019-09-11 10:59:24+00:00): Ja. Ich wollte die Wege eigentlich lang laufen. Aber da war leider nichts was auch nur annähernd nach Weg oder Pfad aussah.

Gruß Siegfried
tux67 (2019-09-11 14:42:07+00:00): ok, danke & Gruß Stephan
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74326576
Martin Borsje (2019-09-10 20:03:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2019-09-11 15:49:10+00:00): Dankjewel!
BCNorwich (2019-09-11 08:04:57+00:00): Hi you are deleting fairways and bunkers. Is this intentional or inadvertent?
Regards Bernard.
Duggiedrop (2019-09-11 09:29:45+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Yes I am completely redoing this course as I was the one who originally mapped out the course and want to improve it..
this however will take me a few days. please feel free to add the service roads back in? - I am only working on the course (tees, greens, fairways, bunkers, cartpaths)
thank you :)
Frans S (2019-09-12 08:18:00+00:00): Hi,
A request. Here, and other places Landuse areas are mapped.
When you later map highways along the borders try the nodes not to snap to those areas. These are errors as you might know
Best regards
TourenbikerFKB (2019-09-12 08:43:34+00:00): Du hast in Bracht an der Schule und an der b3 in Marburg eine Kamera zur Videoüberwachung gemappt (man_made=surveillance). Kann es sein, dass du eigentlich einen Blitzer (Geschwindigkeitsüberwachung) meinst? Die werden mit highway=speed_camera) gemappt + maxspeed=xx. Der Blitzer ist in Bracht schon vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2&node=6786540785#map=18/50.91649/8.84546

Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass es vor der Schule in Bracht eine dauerhafte Videoüberwachung gibt. Deshalb frage ich.
KarmaCleaner (2019-09-11 11:30:18+00:00): you (Trieste OSM team, Roberto Dipiazza, now radac) retagged elements ignoring previous comments and reverts
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74327619
simulator1 (2019-09-10 21:56:08+00:00): Dobro ste ucrtali.
Zanima me postoji li i dalje parking na mjestu gdje se nova cesta spaja sa starom?
Lijep pozdrav.
user_5359 (2019-10-31 08:54:57+00:00): Hello! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. (example: Farmer Bank)
mavl (2019-12-21 16:05:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78713278, 78715571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Seandebasti (2019-09-10 22:37:28+00:00): schön gemacht :)
gscholz (2019-09-28 07:29:40+00:00): Hi,
this changeset has left over traces of a no longer valid relation (8857848):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.10068&lat=-17.66566&zoom=17

Are you going to fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2019-09-28 07:30:35+00:00): Here is the corresponding achavi link:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74328027
5m4u9 (2019-09-30 19:30:58+00:00): I fixed this error, sorry
KarmaCleaner (2019-09-11 11:24:51+00:00): Any particular reason for deleting way 41734177?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74328233
L'imaginaire (2019-09-11 07:12:41+00:00): Mooi! Ik was die optie nog niet tegengekomen, maar past hier inderdaad perfect.
viloan (2019-09-10 20:29:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
muralito (2019-09-11 18:48:02+00:00): Hola Cacha21.

Por favor, tene cuidad con los cambios que hagas con los limites. En este dejaste sin cerrar los limites y es bastante malo para los que usan el dato si queda abierto, porque por ejemplo no se puede calcular que es adentro y afuera de una ciudad o departamento.
muralito (2019-09-11 18:56:13+00:00): Por otra parte, el admin_level es una propiedad de la relacion del limite, no de cada via miembro. Esto es ademas importante cuando el limite lo es en varios niveles a la vez.
Sanniu (2019-09-16 07:20:17+00:00): Hi, you edit looks unfinished - the roads are not connected, left line without any tagging. Can you, please, fix this, as you seem to have local knowledge?
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
iWowik (2019-10-15 18:34:05+00:00): Приветствую вас на проекте, я вижу, что вы рисуете домики, и даже с адресами.
Иногда адреса не легко найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?
Галина Малина (2019-10-15 19:08:20+00:00): Здравствуйте, да скажу.В публичной карте есть все адреса. https://egrp365.ru/. А иногда очень редко встречается)))

Спасибо.
iWowik (2019-10-17 17:20:01+00:00): Спасибо за ответ, Но ни egrp365.ru, ни публичная кадастровая карта не является разрешенным источником в OSM
Галина Малина (2019-10-17 18:33:45+00:00): Добрый вечер!
Это же не плагиат Google и Яндекса. 
Я прочитала права, насколько я поняла в России нет не одного разрешенного источника?!
Пакет удаляете или что теперь делать?
Спасибо.
iWowik (2019-10-18 19:30:06+00:00): Из разрешенного есть генеральные планы поселений, районов и т.д.
В паре областей еще какие-то информационные системы открыли.
Можно смотреть панорамы Яндекс, только изображения, а не наложенные сверху адреса. 
Есть такой источник адресов, как ФИАС, но там нет координат.
Ну и адресные таблички путем обхода.
Галина Малина (2019-10-18 19:51:12+00:00): Спасибо большое за полезную информацию.
В следующий раз учту.
Спасибо)))
mavl (2020-02-21 03:55:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
user_11166885 (2020-07-04 18:25:59+00:00): Il percorso non è raggiungibile.
abrensch (2019-09-21 08:07:47+00:00): Hallo Jasmin,

an diesem Stück der B312 hattest Du has "highway" tag und damit faktisch die Bundesstrasse gelöscht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379448426

ich hab das repariert.

Gruss, Arndt
JPSPL (2019-10-09 12:25:48+00:00): Hallo Arndt, 

das tut mir sehr leid. War keine Absicht. 
Vielen Dank fürs repaieren. 

LG Jasmin
DaveF (2019-10-17 16:33:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM
FYI
I reverted your duplicate Lea Green station as there should only be one per station.
KarmaCleaner (2019-09-11 06:18:38+00:00): You replaced correct place=square with a bigger pedestrian area crossed (as april 2019) by a secondary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74328893
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
mueschel (2019-09-12 08:03:12+00:00): Hi,
you used two new tags here - 
maxspeed:articulated_hgv and maxspeed:motor_car. They are not used in other places. 
These should be 
maxspeed:hgv_articulated and maxspeed:motorcar

But, the tag for articulated hgv is not actually needed, these are a sub-group of  hgv and covered by their maxspeed tag.

Jan
GhostEye (2019-09-12 14:00:11+00:00): Hello Jan, 

Thank you for sharing your expertise. I will be sure to keep this in mind for future editing. 

Best Regards,

Danielle
TravGW (2019-09-11 12:07:18+00:00): I know people love their guns but I'm not sure I'd tag a shooting range as a place of worship just yet. You can tag a shooting range as a sport pitch and add shooting as the sport.
Kostik (2019-09-11 05:40:13+00:00): You delete languages, change the name of your choice. In my opinion this is vandalism.
kartler175 (2020-03-24 10:03:38+00:00): Bitte Adressen bereinigen: https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/#16/51.9016/10.5128/osm-dupes
Eine Adresse existiert nur einmal weltrweit!
ma-rt-in (2019-09-11 09:13:46+00:00): Hallo,
zu deiner Info: Habe deinen Änderungen angepasst, da dein taggingen falsch war.
vg
Yabba (2019-09-11 15:05:38+00:00): was war falsch?
VG
Wulf4096 (2019-09-14 18:17:23+00:00): Hallo Yabba,
du kannst die Änderungen z. B. unter
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74329789
und https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74343179 sehen.
BG.
MiroJanosik (2019-09-11 07:33:44+00:00): Hello, why deleting the 3 sidewalks? I think according the satelite images they are present at the place from where you deleted them.
  Miro
cikicaki (2019-09-11 08:10:57+00:00): sidewalks not connected to tertiary road, not useful for routing
MiroJanosik (2019-09-11 08:15:09+00:00): But still, they are there in reality. Also routing is not only use of OpenStreetMap data, if it would be then we could delete all non-road data, right?
kayle (2019-09-11 08:17:34+00:00): Why delete and not add connection sidewalk -road?
cikicaki (2019-09-11 08:24:55+00:00): adding better than deleting but these particular sidewalks add not "useful" information
MiroJanosik (2019-09-11 11:50:58+00:00): Useful for someone, not useful for someone else. This way you could oppose adding streams, parks, trees, parking lots (I don't need parking lots as pedestrian).

Please, keep sidewalks on the map where they really are, some pedestrians find it helpful.

A mozeme prepnut aj do slovenciny.
 Miro
MiroJanosik (2019-09-16 12:39:23+00:00): Reverted in 74529880, 74530165
szydzio (2019-09-17 06:03:09+00:00): Ta ulica to jednak Modrzewiowa.
freebeer (2020-01-04 03:54:22+00:00): hi,
can you review your change here which is pointed out by https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2045621 ?
clearly something was added or moved in a place it should not have been.
thanks
SpencerJaquish (2020-01-07 22:36:47+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out, freebeer! Looks like we accidentally adjusted the geometry without intending to do so. We'll be sure to look out for this in the future :D
AndresDuhour (2019-09-22 18:36:39+00:00): Estimado, junto con el cambio de la interpolación numérica ha cambiado los nombres de las calles, los mismos estaban siguiendo un criterio de "Calle Nro - Nombre" en toda la ciudad y barrios. Por un lado, los números forman parte de la nomenclatura visible en la ciudad, y por otro lado, esa estructura permite mantener una uniformidad en toda la ciudad, incluyendo las calles que aún no tienen nombre que son numerosas en muchos barrios. Me parece adecuado que se pueda mantener el formato de nombre que le mencionaba. Lo comenté en el grupo de telegram de OSM Argentina donde intercambiamos sobre los criterios de nomenclatura. ¿Cuál es su opinión? supongo que no cambia en cuanto a los aportes que pueda hacer en el tema de interpolaciones. Pero además se generan conflictos porque numerosos comercios están etiquetados con el formato que le mencioné.
Saludos! Andrés
argenos (2019-09-23 20:07:03+00:00): Hola Andrés. El objeto de la edición como Ud dice fue centrarme en la interpolación numérica que tenía una carga parcial y muy defectuosa ya que no contaba con la información del nombre de la calle en los puntos de numeración. Al observar los nombres que siguen el criterio que Ud menciona me doy cuenta que desconozco la fuente de esta información. En los archivos públicos de la provincia de buenos aires figuran los nombres sin los números. Estuve en la zona en los últimos días y la señalización urbana (carteles, etc) no poseen en absoluto el esquema que Ud menciona. Teniendo en cuenta además que el objetivo primordial de un mapa es que se pueda encontrar facilmente una dirección deseada realicé los cambios que Ud menciona tenieno como regla dejar el esquema existente es decir "calle nro - nombre" con el tag alt_name. 
Por supuesto, no creo ser el dueño de la verdad. Por lo que escucho sus comentarios. Un saludo cordial.
user_5359 (2019-09-11 04:26:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description (with defined values) of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one a free text description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. I have delete your name only information.
GinaroZ (2019-09-26 21:34:24+00:00): Hi, is this a signed route?
Ralphie Raccoon (2019-09-26 22:15:30+00:00): Hi,

As far as I'm aware, there is currently no physical signage. I haven't personally surveyed any of the route at this time, so I can't say for sure. The Cycling UK website contains the full route.
GinaroZ (2019-09-27 10:14:19+00:00): I'm wondering if it should even be in OSM then if it's not signed on the ground. Or at least it should be tagged as state=proposed like some other routes so that renders differently.
Ralphie Raccoon (2019-09-27 12:29:14+00:00): I understand your concern. I'll argue my case for keeping the route, and you let me know your thoughts.

Routes that aren't physically signed on OSM aren't unusual. The North Coast 500 in Scotland for example, hasn't yet or has only recently started to sign parts of its route (bureaucracy and finances hold these things up) despite being established since 2015. Many more routes are only partially signposted, with some sections having no signage at all.

As I mentioned, as I have not personally surveyed any part of the route, so I cannot confirm or deny the presence of physical signage. It may well exist on some portions of the route.

The Great North Trail is certainly noteworthy, it's been mentioned in several UK news articles, and the route is freely available from a well established cyclists touring club. They also mention some work on acquiring permissive access on some parts of the route, so it's not been completely created out of thin air.