piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
scruss (2016-10-17 21:02:30+00:00): but it hasn't received the national talk-ca approval or had approval from the main Imports list, as required here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_5_-_Import_Review . Also, it's an import from a non-dedicated account, which is not allowed.
Nakaner (2016-10-17 21:38:20+00:00): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2016-October/007416.html
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:04:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:04:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
AlaskaDave (2017-03-28 08:47:07+00:00): I can not find any references to the Dr Suess House at this location. Can you tell me how you located this place?

All the items I found in a Google search seem to be near Willow, on the north side of Willow Creek
Spanholz (2017-03-28 09:12:50+00:00): I got the rough location from somebody on reddit who was there. But I have looked at the area and found the real house a bit south of it. 

Already changed it to correct location. Thanks for correcting me. :)
AlaskaDave (2017-03-28 09:30:26+00:00): Yes, I found it too. But we're both trying to correct it at the same time LOL

it's here:
62.03923364985006, -150.08611523313525

Can you hold off for a moment to let me upload my changes and we'll see if there's any disagreement.
AlaskaDave (2017-03-28 10:08:43+00:00): Okay, we did it!

Keep on mapping!
highflyer74 (2016-10-12 07:27:45+00:00): Hello Fred!

I noticed you added some information to OSM which is good. Please always keep an eye on the tags which are already present on a object and on objects around it. In this case https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2807912159 there was quite a mix up... This used to be an information board tagged with several tags (as in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dinformation). Some of that tagging was still left, while at the same time a shop has been added to the same node (by the way shop=Warenhaus is no valid OSM tagging ;-)).

I fixed the tagging (opening_hours=*, shop=* etc) and removed the name=Deutsche Bank from the building itself.

If you would like to continue mapping, I can really recommend using JOSM as an editor. This gives you much more editing comfort and protects the mapper from accidentally destroying things.

All the best,

Oliver
SomeoneElse (2016-10-11 07:49:04+00:00): Oops - you've added a bar in the middle of the Atlantic here.  Can you please re-add it where it actually exists?
Supaplex (2016-10-10 17:14:21+00:00): 寧夏夜市重覆了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396410905
indigomc (2017-02-20 06:45:41+00:00): Hi Naveen. Can you please say what the 108 in the name of this temple mean? Thanks, user indigomc.
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:54:19+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-12-01 17:28:52+00:00): 請不要加入現地不存在的事物
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:04:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
rab (2016-10-10 17:24:15+00:00): Hi, I did some further mapping, based on your additions. Could you please check this ways for correctness?
Thanks in advance
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446872618
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373509780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446872619
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4440939158
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:04:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
Gumeg (2017-06-10 17:39:54+00:00): для геометрии травы source=чятик ? :)
Владимир К (2017-06-12 06:14:55+00:00): это очень странно. потому что траву я рисовал по фотке, памяти, и куску трека. и не помню чтобы писал такой источник раньше. и на более ранних правках его нет(если бы я забыл его поменят с прошлой правки). и при этом вроде недавно писал такой источник :/
Gumeg (2017-06-13 10:56:53+00:00): Копипаста..
Кстати газоны сейчас видны с Мэпбокса и Бинга, чуть можно подправить. 3 дня назад это место смотрел по актуальности снимков как раз.
Commodoortje (2016-10-11 15:42:34+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
(Onbewust) heb je:
► 2x de beautyshop op OSM geplaatst.
► 2 verschillende telefoonnummers, inmiddels heb ik op de website de (vermoedelijk) juiste laten staan.
► De overgebleven poi heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnote
►ik heb beauty=nails toegevoegd
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:03:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
Vulcanodong (2016-10-11 11:57:04+00:00): 被高速公路替代的普通国道应该以次要道路进行标注
Olek (2016-10-15 22:19:42+00:00): Witam serdecznie,
wygląda na to, że omyłkowo usunął Pan utworzoną przeze mnie drogę łączącą rondo w Srebrnej-Dąbrowie z ulicą Działkową w Srebrnej. Nie ma jej jeszcze na zdjęciach lotniczych/satelitarnych, ponieważ została ona utworzona niedawno, na potrzeby dojazdu na budowę (prowadzoną na południe od ul. Srebrna Ostoja).

Będę wdzięczny za wycofanie tej zmiany.
Pozdrawiam,
Aleksander Mielczarek
Pan_Teofor (2016-10-17 10:15:08+00:00): Dzień dobry
Znalazłem drogę którą rzeczywiście usunąłem, ale nie wiem jak cofnąć wprowadzoną zmianę.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-11 07:23:01+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It's not necessarily a problem if Merlin Close is in two parts with the same name - if a road has other tags that vary along its length (perhaps if the speed limit changes) then that'd be entirely normal.
In this case the only difference seems to be the "postal_code" - if that's the same for both parts of the road you can merge them.
In Potlatch 2 (the editor that you are using) click on one way, control-click on the other, look at the "tags" at the left to see what's different between the two and if you're happy to merge them click the "chain" at bottom left of the window.
By the way (and I know these were added a couple of years ago by someone else) there's no need to add tags such as "foot=yes" for a residential road - it's pretty much assumed.
Best Regards,
Andy
trigpoint (2016-10-10 17:15:13+00:00): What is in the place of Costcutter?
SomeoneElse (2016-10-11 07:32:25+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
The last time that I was the there, the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211936795 was just Croxton Lane (according to the sign in Harston).
The changeset comment says it's to "make turn by turn navigation work".  What app or device is having a problem with not giving turn directions when the road name remains the same?
Cheers,
Andy
Iroch (2016-10-11 11:01:23+00:00): Hi, I am new to this so I will bow to superior knowledge...the device I was using was a garmin 810 following a gpx track created using strava, I get no turn notification for the junction coming from Harston, you are correct the road should not have brackets after 'Croxton Lane' - please advise or change back to what is the proper way. It could just be my device and not the map. Like I say I am new to this and could just put this down to learning.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-24 18:05:14+00:00): Thanks - I've changed them back so that the names in OSM match the names on the ground.
Last week I would have said "I don't see this problem with a Garmin nuvi", but just a couple of days ago did notice the same problem down in South Wales.  I don't know how to fix it, unfortunately.
alphensebezorger (2016-10-11 17:49:42+00:00): Hallo michieldejongh,

Naar aanleiding van het forum keek ik eens wat rond bij Oudenbosch. In de Vaartweg ontdekte ik een rare zigzag.
Zo te zien is in deze changeset de hele Koestraat (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7239225) ongeveer 50m naar het oosten geschoven. Dat zal wel niet de bedoeling zijn geweest? Ik neem aan dat je het zelf kan terugdraaien, laat het anders maar even weten.

Met vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.
micheldejongh (2016-10-11 18:50:40+00:00): Hallo Alphensebezorger,
Dit was inderdaad niet de bedoeling. Ik heb de data hersteld. Bedankt voor het melden, het was me nog niet opgevallen.
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Michel de Jongh
trigpoint (2016-10-10 16:31:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. This is a very odd name and location for a viewpoint, please could you explain?
trigpoint (2016-10-10 17:52:46+00:00): The location of this cafe looks a bit odd, I would expect it to be in one of the buildings rather than on the pavement.
Cheers Phil
pieleric (2016-10-12 14:00:20+00:00): Hi,
When you duplicate a way, make sure to connect every street to that way. Otherwise, it looks like the road crosses every street without allowing to turn.

You can see the errors it creates here:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=15&lat=34.23448&lon=108.87604&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C191%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C220%2C20&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1

Thanks!
mueschel (2016-10-13 10:44:22+00:00): Hi,
you used the word 'schol' twice in the tagging of this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446863267
Did you mean 'school'? Btw, is the source you give on the way compatible with OSMs license?

Jan
highflyer74 (2016-10-12 12:40:25+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

Du hast hier ein paar Objekte mit area=yes als einzigem Tag erstellt. Was hat es damit auf sich? Nach dem Satellitenbild scheint es sich um Gebäude zu handeln.

Noch ein Tipp: Wenn Du Gebäude zeichnest, geht dies mit dem Editor JOSM und entsprechendem Plugin sehr viel einfacher. Da lassen sich auch Reihenhäuser leicht erstellen. Dies gleichmäßig von Hand zu machen, ist nur schwer möglich und kostet viel Zeit.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
EneaSuper (2016-10-12 14:24:41+00:00): Ottimo lavoro! :)
rab (2016-10-10 17:23:14+00:00): Hi, I did some further mapping, based on your additions. Could you please check this ways for correctness?
Thanks in advance
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446872618
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373509780
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446872619
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4440939158
Leather-Bags|Rickshaw-Journey (2017-04-18 20:43:06+00:00): https://www.rickshawjourney.com/
Tomas Straupis (2016-10-11 10:42:49+00:00): Kas čia per ref žymos?
Jei čia kažkokie techniniai ar vietinės reikšmės laukai, tai reikia arba trinti lauk, o jei jie realiai kažkur naudojami, tai bent jau perkelti į kokią nors kitą žymą, tarkim „ref:lt:KAZKAS“.
Goffredo (2016-10-10 22:56:16+00:00): Ciao, scusa la domanda, ma sei sicuro della posizione? io me lo ricordavo sull'altro lato della strada....
vbmanu (2016-10-13 09:18:45+00:00): Io sono abbastanza sicuro. Tu eri sicuro della posizione quando lo hai aggiunto? Di solito è buona norma fare un sopralluogo ed essere certi delle modifiche che si apportano per evitare che altri mappatori debbano correggere nuovamente
Goffredo (2016-10-13 11:28:30+00:00): Beh, esserci stato è sufficente? poi, può essere che mi sia ricordato la posizione errata, se sei sicuro meglio così. La collaborazione è la natura di OSM. Non commento i changeset perché voglio impormi, ma solo perché ho dei dubbi, tutto qui. E posso benissimo sbagliare, come pare in questo caso.
vbmanu (2016-10-13 11:35:34+00:00): Bene così. Questo è lo spirito giusto. Buon lavoro
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:04:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
martinum4 (2017-08-25 20:03:49+00:00): Hallo,

ich hätte für die Zukunft eine Bitte, die Sperrstreifen und Inseln nicht mehr als Spuren erfassen, sie sind nicht regulär befahrbar, daher auch keine Spuren. Ich habs jetzt hier mal geändert...
martinum4 (2017-08-25 20:08:14+00:00): Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.79865/10.22168 hab ich mal exemplarisch die Spur an den Verkehrsinseln aufgeteilt, so kann man es auch manchen wenn man möchte, sieht evtl. etwas ordentlicher aus...

Schöne Grüße

Martin
Smiljan_02 (2017-09-03 08:51:03+00:00): Hallo Martin,
war jetzt einige Zeit nicht im Lande.
Einbahnstraßen gibt es dort aber auch nicht, für Verkehrsinseln gibt es den Key traffic_calming=island , aber viele Wege führen zum Ziel.

Grüße
Senni
mueschel (2016-10-14 10:45:20+00:00): Hi,
the road names here look rather strange - Clarkia Dr, followed by Hibiscus Dr, and again Clarkia Dr - could you check that?

And, this node has a strange tag: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4441060895   "2 = 4 Hibiscus Drive"

Jan
mueschel (2016-10-12 14:34:10+00:00): Hi,
just a comment on destinations in different languages: According to the wiki, languages are added as 'destination:lang:en', not just 'destination:en' 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details

Cheers, Jan
plamen (2016-10-12 19:42:37+00:00): OK, agree, thanks.
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
Osm1980 (2016-10-28 10:09:20+00:00): تگ nameفقط برای اسامی به زبان فارسی است
و برای اسامی انگلیسی از تگ name:en استفاده میشود
Samadi (2016-10-28 17:05:16+00:00): متوجه کامنت نمی شوم
Osm1980 (2016-10-28 20:13:34+00:00): لطفا بیان به آدرسه تلگرامم
@osm1980
fkv (2017-10-15 23:27:11+00:00): Bist du sicher, dass die Straße komplett asfaltiert ist? Bei meiner Bearbeitung (2012) hatte ich extra einen Wegpunkt aufgenommen an der Stelle, wo der Asphalt endete.
Rudolf Mayer (2017-10-16 08:17:21+00:00): Sorry, ja, der allerletzte Teil ist anscheinend unbeabsichtigt mit reingerutscht, der ist nicht asphaltiert; habe das korrigiert, danke für den Hinweis
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:03:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
GerdP (2018-10-16 14:13:05+00:00): Hi! Please use one of the lifecycle prefixes instead of the unusual highway=demolished for
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432979568 and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444346202
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Maldor (2016-10-17 19:31:04+00:00): Bad Change, Sorry. Did not verify all of the details
Florek89 (2021-11-29 16:54:02+00:00): Trochę późno, ale w Izdebnie dałeś bardzo dużo szklarni, które w rzeczywistości są na przykład stodołami
RitterR (2016-10-11 21:53:39+00:00): Cześć, Zacząłeś dodawać granice administracyjne w Gryfowie Śląskim, ale jeszcze ich chyba nie skończyłeś, bo nie są zamknięte. Przeniosłem tag admin_level do relacji, bo tak przyjęte jest w Polsce.
chris2map (2016-10-23 08:49:10+00:00): Dies ist kein Parkhaus sondern ein Parkplatz an der Oberfläche.
Der Name des Parkplatzes ist "Adenauerstraße" (gemäß Beschilderung) oder auch "Konrad-Adenauer-Parkplatz".
ulmtuelp (2016-10-18 19:54:10+00:00): Hier haben alle Gebäude die Hausnummer 0!?
Stadtteil (Pretzien) kann in addr:suburb geschrieben werden, in addr.city dann nur noch Schönebeck.
spaceman02 (2016-10-18 21:13:46+00:00): Natürlich haben sie nicht wirklich die "0". Aber ich habe erst einmal die Gebäude aufgenommen (vorher war hier noch gar nichts eingezeichnet).
Die Hausnummern werden in der nächsten Zeit sicher auch noch kommen.
Das mit addr:suburb wusste ich bis vor kurzen nicht. Wird sicher auch noch geändert.
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:04:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
BCNorwich (2016-10-11 05:40:15+00:00): Change-set reverted!
Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately your first addition to the OSM database went a bit wrong it inadvertently altered existing data and added a road haphazardly through buildings. Therefore I have reverted those alterations for you. I would suggest you read up a bit before your next go at adding/altering the live worldwide database from which many maps are compiled.

Regards Bernard
scruss (2016-10-17 19:13:42+00:00): Hi Denis - how are you getting address points from Bing imagery?
DenisCarriere (2016-10-17 19:54:51+00:00): @scruss The address points are from the City of Ottawa open Data portal, they have already been imported by another user.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446837025
And building footprints are from the StatsCan building project.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada#Crowdsourcing_buildings_with_Statistics_Canada

The Bing source was used to make sure to align any buildings and verify if the points & buildings matched.

The source is added to the building tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=45.28274&lon=-75.75808
scruss (2016-10-17 20:07:47+00:00): Hi Denis - the StatsCan import has no documentation, data links or community import buy-in. So it can't yet be proceeding, can it?

Also, there are address nodes with source=bing, not just buildings.

You must use a dedicated account to import data, too.
DenisCarriere (2016-10-17 20:12:18+00:00): Well I wasn't importing data, I was cleaning the existing data and merging address points to buildings.

Some of the buildings were drawn via Bing.

Some of the address nodes with source=bing were added by other users, I simply merged them into the buildings.

The project is being driven by the local OSM Ottawa group and many emails have been passed to the OSM Canada mailing list, sorry if you weren't following it.
scruss (2016-10-17 20:14:47+00:00): I am following it, closely.  There are no docs, no process and no discussion.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-10-11 01:07:23+00:00): Hej, bardzo Ci zależy, by integrować obrysy z adresami? Trochę mi to zaburza wyłapywanie, które gminy wymagają aktualizacji adresacji...
Warin61 (2017-05-16 08:46:25+00:00): Part of a river... 

Moved - to discover already in OSM .. deleted.
contrapunctus (2016-10-11 14:01:45+00:00): Hey there! Glad to see another person working on Delhi. Please consider using more descriptive commit messages - makes life easier for us all :)
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:03:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
user_5359 (2016-10-11 17:24:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset, because  I didn’t believe that a footway is oneway way and a footway hasn’t the name of the object, he gives access to.
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:03:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:03:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
Warin61 (2017-05-16 08:40:56+00:00): Looks like the front of someones yard!! 

Source?
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:04:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:54:49+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
user_5359 (2016-10-11 17:14:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This area is smaller as a residential building :)
user_5359 (2016-11-22 17:58:31+00:00): I have deleted this entry.
oba510 (2016-10-11 05:25:33+00:00): It looks like, over multiple changesets, you've deleted several streets and at least one path in this area that are clearly visible in Bing/USGS imagery.  Was that intentional?
DD1GJ (2016-10-11 07:01:15+00:00): Hallo psychoburg, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. In diesem Changeset hattest Du wohl versehentlich zuviel gelöscht wie z.B. die südliche Bahnhofstraße und einige Hydranten sowie der Post das Gebäude weggenommen.

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=42790783

Ich habe diese Löschungen aufwändig wieder hergestellt, so dass die anderen Änderungen erhalten geblieben sind. Potlatch oder iD sijnd für solch dicht gemappten Gebiete suboptimal. Wechsle bitte zu JOSM, da gibt es Warnungen, bevor Du, wie geschehen, Relationen zerstörst.

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AWikiStart

Wurde die Sparkasse wirklich geschlossen?
psychoburg (2016-10-11 14:40:08+00:00): Moin , alter Falter, habe die Maus nur angefasst und unser hydrant in der Lindenbreite war weg.  Das war echt schon ganz schön sensibel . Sry erstmal dafür !!! Mit der Sparkasse sage ich mal jain 🤔 . Sie Sparkasse selber gibt es nicht mehr . Es wurden die mitarbeiter im Landkreis verteilt . Von aussen ist es auch nicht mehr sichtbar das es dort ein Bank war oder ist . Das einzige was da noch ist sind die Geldautomaten und der Terminal.  

Danke nochmal 
Psychoburg
DD1GJ (2016-10-11 21:47:03+00:00): Gern geschehen. Ich habe gerade noch die Sparkasse wieder hergestellt und einen Geldautomaten daraus gemacht.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
psychoburg (2016-10-11 21:52:22+00:00): Super danke , muss mich hier echt erst einmal bisschen einfuchsen. Weiss auf alle fälle das ich da nicht nochmal hin gehen werde :-) Ist das dann hier auch irgendwie bei Google maps gespeichert oder wie läuft das hier alles. Zum besispiel mit unserem Haus ( Lindenbreite 18 ) gibt es ja in maps nicht bzw die Hausnummer 18 ist ganz woanders.
DD1GJ (2016-10-11 21:58:40+00:00): Google und OpenStreetMap sind zwei Paar verschiedene Stiefel. Lies Dir am Besten folgendes Tutorial durch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
rene78 (2016-10-11 07:10:54+00:00): Great job :) Good to see the Malaysian community grow!
muralito (2016-10-11 11:22:04+00:00): Mas cuidado con los cambios por favor.  Borraste el agua del Cuareim.

Los parques y demas elementos no van pegados a las calles. La callle representa el medio de la calle. Los elementos van dibujados hasta donde llegue el predio.
PabloNLM (2016-10-11 16:36:52+00:00): Ok. ¿En qué parte le borré el agua?