piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber (2021-05-11 12:26:53+00:00): Le numéro de téléphone semble être un numéro perso, le site web ne répond pas, est-ce que le nom  est également le nom d'un élève ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104490874
Keima (2021-05-11 16:59:28+00:00): Ressemble très fortement à une blague, annulé par 104526039.
Vinber (2021-05-11 12:28:31+00:00): Stade ajouté en doublon, bijouterie ....
plus une liste sans fin ci-dessus d'avertissement dont il n'a pas été tenu compte
Keima (2021-05-11 18:54:37+00:00): J'ai supprimé le stade en doublon
Vinber (2021-05-11 15:01:09+00:00): Vous semblez avoir déplacé des passages piétons à rennes vers l  rue pierre lefeuvre, annulation
Keima (2021-05-11 13:50:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette information était déja présente dans la base de données (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3204926589)
Je l'ai donc supprimé (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104504495).
==
Hi,
This information was already present in the database (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3204926589). 
Therefore I remove it (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104504495).
Vinber (2021-05-11 12:23:07+00:00): Bonjour,
la boulangerie semble être hors des murs, suprenant.
Au regard du nom de votre compte, pourriez vous décrire plus précisément votre profil, classe, lycée, ...

Pour rappel https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt

Cordialement

PS : envisagez vous de faire quelques choses vis à vis des modifications en cours (par exemple ici peut-être des données personelles : https://osmcha.org/changesets/104490874/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22SNT_Cezanne_jgaltier%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22SNT_Cezanne_jgaltier%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104491499
frydzio (2021-05-11 07:51:39+00:00): Skąd nazwa "park szlaku Ziemi Łukowskiej"? W dokumentach przetargowych pojawia się nazwa "Skwerek >>Kępa<<" https://ugserokomla.bip.lubelskie.pl/index.php?id=323&p1=szczegoly&p2=69526
charl3s (2021-05-11 08:48:31+00:00): https://lgdrazem.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ZALACZNIK-15-Przedmiar-SEROKOMLA-dzialka-1223-1.pdf

Miałem tę nazwę jeszcze poprawiać, bo nie wiem jak to nazwać
freeExec (2021-05-16 08:34:14+00:00): Мост восстановили или тупо под валидатор?
user_2066394 (2021-05-11 09:46:13+00:00): Da ergeben sich in der Folge Adressduplikate.

Die Garagen benötigen keine Hausnummer.
Ronny Stiffel (2021-05-11 09:49:15+00:00): OK.
user_2066394 (2021-05-11 09:55:16+00:00): Ist der umgezogen?
B14CK313 (2021-05-14 13:36:40+00:00): Ja, ist jetzt bei der Auffahrt auf die B300 (Daimlerstraße)
Asteliks (2021-07-02 19:11:02+00:00): Duży ten landuse uwaga Dawida ;P
szydzio (2021-07-05 06:41:22+00:00): Mówimy o https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8388122 ?
Asteliks (2021-07-05 07:02:36+00:00): Sii
szydzio (2021-07-05 07:41:05+00:00): No, istotnie, trochę duży ale zasadniczo poprawny. Chcesz go jakoś dzielić ?
Asteliks (2021-07-05 07:54:32+00:00): TBH ja bym zostawił ale Dawid się z niego śmiał. Napisałem na discordzie żeby się odezwał
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-11 08:47:20+00:00): What is the source of your data? As there are no open datasets containing forest names.
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-13 05:25:56+00:00): Will you be able to remove all of your illegal changes (not only forests) by yourself or do you need help from DWG?
Jay May (2021-05-13 08:56:06+00:00): 1) In 2012, before I started living in Lithuania, I've got a present: a paper map representing all protected areas, but also a couple of forests (not all). I got the approval of the person that gave it to me, that worked in a related institution and that allowed me to use that data as I had already created an account on OSM.
2) Most of the names of the forests can also be found on (usually wooden) roadsigns on the spot. 

I've just contacted the DWG for their opinion on the matter, as I've started using this map only very recently (it's too big to use it every day). We will see what they answer. If they ask me to remove something I will. If not, we will see.
Tomas Straupis (2021-05-13 09:24:08+00:00): Protected area information is in STK cadastre (which is also not opened yet) and it does not include forest names. Forest names come from MK, which is owned by other organisation which is so far pretty against any type of opening, I doubt any person (even working in that institution) can somehow overrule official stance on the status of that dataset. Signs of forests are way too vague to be able to tag a POLYGON with a forest name, just like city limit signs are pointless in mapping admin boundaries.
(BTW if by "2012 protected area map" you meen an ortophotographic map with yellow points for POI's then that map is VERY outdated/unusable)
Jay May (2021-05-13 12:40:07+00:00): You might be right, but let's wait for their reply.
woodpeck (2021-10-09 20:49:11+00:00): Jay May, you must observe copyright when contributing to OSM. The DWG is not the institution that decided where copyright applies; it's the laws of the place where the map was published. Usually maps will have a copyright notice. If they don't then the law usually assigns copyright nonetheless. Copyright usually expires a given time after the death of the author; for institutional publishers, copyright expiry rules might be different. It is your job to research that and to specify proper sources when uploading your data. If you receive special permission from the map publisher or a legal representative, get that in writing and upload it somehwere where others can see.
Jay May (2021-10-09 21:39:24+00:00): Dear woodpeck,
I just wrote you a PM. I already wrote with one of your fellow guys from the DWG about that back in June, but I didn't follow up because one of my loved ones passed away and because I had to spend 3 months abroad due to work.
All the rest of the info will be in PM. Thank you.
Tomas Straupis (2021-06-09 14:49:44+00:00): What was the answer from DWG regarding illegal data uploaded? Including this one. Or should I contact them?
Jay May (2021-06-09 15:03:01+00:00): Who told you this data is illegal?
For the forests, it is already arranged.
Jay May (2021-06-09 15:04:00+00:00): ... and actually this specific one, as far as I remember, was taken on the spot.
Tomas Straupis (2021-06-09 18:21:27+00:00): I told you the data you've used is illegal. OK, I will contact DWG directly.
Jay May (2021-06-09 18:23:09+00:00): The DWG did not give me any instructions to delete anything so far, but they gave me other instructions (that I will keep between them and myself, and that I am already complying with).
Anyway, I won't have the physical possibility to verify what I marked manually as "seen on the spot" nor what the DWG asked me to additionally verify until the end of the summer (I am constantly on business trips) and I barely have the time since mid-May to edit anything on OSM. 
As a preventive step, if your concern is REALLY the legality of such data (and not, once again, personal animosity), I'd suggest you to delete the names of forests except the ones at the very border with Latvia (I am referring to the ones that touch the border). 
I also recall having edited something close to Belarus. For most of those forests, either I saw the names somewhere on the spot, either I recall local people calling them like that (for which a "loc_name" tag can always be added, but I am awaiting confirmation from the DWG if I should do that).
I also remember having seen a couple of forests marked on the spot with specific names between Eišiškės and Pirčiupiai, but I forgot to mark them. I quoted their names somewhere, but these notes are somewhere at my home.
eggie (2022-12-17 07:46:45+00:00): Hi Panosprof..

Please don't shift the map in editmodus all over Europe. This may harm the map..

Greetz,
eggie
Panosprof (2022-12-17 11:31:19+00:00): Hi eggie,

I'm sorry I didn't realise I couldn't move around in edit mode. I'll be careful next time.

Best,
Panosprof
OsmAnd_Pieter (2021-05-11 15:32:49+00:00): did you change the location of the recycling container?  please go an look at the spot yourselve. I have used the new location 50 meter south 1 month ago.
bxl-forever (2021-05-12 14:44:07+00:00): Hello,
Oh, that’s interesting.  I thought you might have moved the node by mistake because I found it in changeset 104433598 about something unrelated.
Indeed, the change must have been very recent, then.  Latest Mapillary pictures have the former location.  We’ll keep your change, then.
archie (2021-05-11 09:00:45+00:00): Hej, varför har du placerat noden med beach långt ute i vattnet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8720913517)?
Patrik Bäckander (2021-05-11 10:21:14+00:00): Tack för tips. Har korrigerat nu.
archie (2021-05-11 12:38:41+00:00): Varför flyttade du noen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4332539677/history) med namn och tagg för Rävnäsbukten på land?
joost schouppe (2021-05-11 12:06:42+00:00): Tout me parrais bien
mattian (2021-05-11 09:40:02+00:00): Buongiorno Luca e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!
Non riesco a capire la creazione dei due nodi "Piazza Loggia" e "Corso Zanardelli" con descrizione "Capienza 20". Cosa mappano questi due nuovi nodi?
ravali_78 (2021-05-17 07:47:47+00:00): Hi JackP11,
I have found overlapping building polygon with footway and edits was done by Quang Huy Ku.Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104604033.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104498752
streckenkundler (2021-05-11 09:50:43+00:00): Hei,

das gibt es schon: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3799219463 war nur von der Lage her nicht gut. CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104502860

Sven
user_5239402 (2021-05-11 09:29:47+00:00): ??
spiregrain (2024-10-16 16:03:53+00:00): Are you still in the area?  HAve these two been completed?
Harry Wood (2024-10-18 10:30:59+00:00): Yeah live pretty nearby. It's still in construction. Taking a while! but starting to look like it might be finished soon. I suppose I could try to have a guess at where the new building is now within the construction area.
spiregrain (2024-10-18 10:54:32+00:00): In changeset 158044871, I've jsut added planning refs (P2018/2269/FUL) to the three sites.

If you look up that ref on the Islington portal (https://planning.agileapplications.co.uk/islington/search-applications/ ) you can see what was planned back in 2018, and pick through revisions since.   Not sure you can just 'trace' these.  But there are floor plans and elevations available that you can compare what what's visible on the ground.
limes11 (2021-05-11 16:33:54+00:00): Hallo, 

über diesen Weg verlaufen Wanderwege. access=private ist demnach fragwürdig. Bezieht sich das Verbot auf Fahrzeuge?

Viele Grüße, Limes
NoName8383 (2021-05-11 16:44:19+00:00): Hallo und danke für die Rückfrage,

dieser Abschnitt ist Teil eines Privatgrundstückes (siehe Flurkarten beim Grundbuch- und Vermessungsamt) und somit liegt es im Ermessen, was der Eigentümer gestattet. Demnach ist der Weg grundsätzlich als privat zu behandeln. Gegenwärtig ist er (noch) nicht abgesperrt.

Gruß
Jakka (2021-05-11 10:00:32+00:00): "opening_hours:covid19"="same"
better to repeat the opening_hours
Also the type of creditcard that can be used
YannickXIII (2021-05-11 10:56:11+00:00): bancontact, visa and mastercard are accepted. I don't know how to add this to the store.
For the opning hours : I d'ont understand: what should I do ?
It's opened tuesday to friday 9h30 to 18h and saturday 9h30 to 17h.
Thank you
Jakka (2021-05-11 11:27:29+00:00): "opening_hours"="Tu-Fr 09:30-18:00; Sa 09:30-17:00"
"opening_hours:covid19"="Tu-Fr 09:30-18:00; Sa 09:30-17:00"
j'ai ajouter ;)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8719543456
user_5359 (2021-05-12 04:06:25+00:00): Hello! What is the menaing of the tag ANAN=1? See http://www.osm.org/way/434143606 (one example)
nona mostafa (2021-05-17 06:47:50+00:00): Hello user_5359,
Sorry, it was upload by mistake
thank you for your comment, and sorry for the late reply.
regards
nona mostafa
tux67 (2021-05-11 10:42:53+00:00): Hallo Jürgen Vorwerk,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Du hattest ein review requested. Grundsätzlich sehen die Ergänzungen ok aus. Solltest du allerdings nur nach Luftbild mappen, dann ist Bing die denkbar schlechteste Quelle in der Gegend. Du solltest die NRW oder NL Orthos nehmen. 
Wenn du andere Quellen nutzt, dann solltest du auf jeden Fall beim Upload das Source Feld befüllen. .. local Knowledge oder gpx track .. je nachdem was passt. 
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
Vinber-Pro (2021-05-11 17:02:39+00:00): Bonjour,
pour les horaires, il faut simplement renseigner la partie "code" et pas tout le lien vers yohours.
Si besoin, tu me dis !
Bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104502607
eggie (2021-05-11 10:21:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  produce		live_animal lijkt erg ongebruikelijk. 
Je hebt het grsaland omgezet naar akkerland. Weet je dat zeker? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-11 10:25:35+00:00): Wanneer het weidegebied is kun je het beter taggen met landuse=meadow ipv farmland
Gr eggie
Ytrog (2021-05-11 10:32:08+00:00): Ah dank je. Goede tip. Ik bedoelde dat er voornamelijk koeien (en ezels) staan.
eggie (2021-05-11 10:47:43+00:00): Oke.. dan dus =meadow... maar wellicht kun je het wel helemaal opnieuw indelen. Leuke klus.
eggie
Ytrog (2021-05-11 11:04:13+00:00): Zeker leuk 😄
literan (2021-05-11 16:08:33+00:00): Не совсем понимаю, зачем уже указанное в тегах contact: дублировать в теги website и phone. Также не понимаю, зачем название магазина "Новая заря" дублировать в теге operator https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/7370160392
VlIvYur (2021-05-17 17:14:23+00:00): contact: проглядел что уже есть.Название магазина никак не связано с компанией,которая торгует в этом магазине,её имя и указано в operator.Хотя надо было ещё перенести name в brand
eggie (2021-05-11 10:28:07+00:00): Dag Ytrog.. 

Alle begin is moeilijk. 
In OSM taggen we bij op de adresnode en anders gewoon een node aanmaken. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek.
MVG
eggie
trial (2021-05-15 08:17:07+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap, j'ai corrigé de lake en pond le lac Pont Person (c'est ou c'était un étang). est-ce définitif ? pour le moment j'ai mis intermittent=yes.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/47.84605/-3.38393&layers=N
claireapp (2021-05-19 07:01:04+00:00): Oui c'est définitif, même la rivière qui l'alimentait a été déviée.
trial (2021-05-19 10:57:15+00:00): https://www.lorient-agglo.bzh/actus/toutes-les-actualites/actualite/news/effacement-de-letang-de-pont-person-a-cleguer/ (en plus je l'avais lu par le passé !)
Dans un premier temps j'ai mis "vase" mais peut-être peut-on le décrire dès à présent comme prairie (Cf. imagerie Maxar). A priori il manque la passerelle pour passer d'un côté à l'autre.
eggie (2021-05-11 10:31:23+00:00): Probeer plakken van obkecten  te voorkomen . Het huis zit nu vastgeplakt aan de landuse.
Alle gebouwen zijn directe import van het kadaster. Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit aan het kadaster doorgeven
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=boerkampweg%2031&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=1773010000000720&objectId=1773100000011309&geometry.x=205716.68799743&geometry.y=482625.59399978&zoomlevel=7

MVG
eggie
Ytrog (2021-05-11 10:46:33+00:00): Ow aha dat wist ik niet
grawal (2025-11-19 17:43:49+00:00): Ciao, vedo che in questo changeset, hai nominato 232 il percorso 145610932. Normalmente ammesso che sia corretto-ma dubito- andrebbe inserito nel campo ref. Dove hai attinto questo dato?
itasterix (2025-11-20 08:48:56+00:00): Ciao, il dato arriva dai miei occhi che vedono i cartelli che indicano i sentieri, visto che giro spesso in zona.
eggie (2021-05-11 10:33:33+00:00): Dit kun je ook doorgeven middels een terugmelding aan het kadaster.
Doe je dat zelf?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=boerkampweg%2031&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=1773010000000720&objectId=1773100000011309&geometry.x=205703.24799743&geometry.y=482806.78577554&zoomlevel=7
MVG
eggie
maro21 (2021-06-27 13:45:46+00:00): To jakieś nowe rondo?
Bąbel (2021-06-27 22:48:48+00:00): ?? zlikwidowano. Od kiedy?
Bąbel (2021-06-27 22:49:59+00:00): Ja przez to rondo jechałem. Gdy mnie Yanosik przeczołgał manowcami.
Bąbel (2021-06-27 22:56:50+00:00): ***W ramach realizacji zadania na odcinku około 900 m wzmocniono i poszerzono konstrukcję drogi powiatowej, wybudowano obustronne ciągi pieszo-rowerowe, chodniki, zatoki autobusowe, miejsca parkingowe i zjazdy oraz elementy odwodnienia drogowego. Opracowano także plan nasadzeń zastępczych. Początek modernizowanego odcinka stanowi nowo wybudowane rondo na zbiegu ulic Wilczyckiej, Cyprysowej i Rzecznej, natomiast koniec to rejon istniejącego skrzyżowania z ulicą Wrocławską. W ramach przedsięwzięcia wykonano również przebudowę oświetlenia ulicznego wraz z budową oświetlenia z oprawami LED przy przejściach na rondzie.
Bąbel (2021-06-27 22:59:20+00:00): PRZEBUDOWA ULICY WILCZYCKIEJ ZA 6 MLN ZŁOTYCH
eggie (2021-05-11 10:35:20+00:00): Hier wat info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dfarm_auxiliary

Up to you
gr eggie
Ytrog (2021-05-11 11:03:15+00:00): Top
user_177389 (2021-05-12 16:31:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset #104584195 - several destroyed boundary relations restored.
pitscheplatsch (2021-05-13 11:19:11+00:00): Hallo TiHack,

vielen Dank für deine Änderungen und Aktivitäten bzgl. des Eintragens von Hydranten bei OpenStreetMap.

In deinen letzten Änderungen ist mir aufgefallen, dass du einige #what3words Beschreibungen aufgenommen hast. Ist dir die folgende OSM Wiki Seite bekannt? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:What3words

Danke & Viele Grüße,
Pascal

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
TiHack (2021-05-13 12:11:59+00:00): Hi Pascal, 

mir war der Artikel nicht bekannt. Vielen Dank für die Information. Ich werde es in Zukunft beachten und keine weiteren what3words Einträge vornehmen und die bereits angepassten Änderungen wieder rückgängig machen und die Einträge entfernen. 

Viele Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2021-05-13 14:03:31+00:00): Prima, vielen Dank für deine Antwort und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen!
Mastrick_Mapper (2021-05-11 10:11:29+00:00): Correction only updated road layout. Did not include houses in this changeset.
eggie (2021-05-11 10:39:35+00:00): Dag Ytrog.

Wanneer het de naam is van het gebouw dan is het oke.. wanneer het de naam is van het bedrijf dan op de adresnode bijtaggen en ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dprinting

gr eggie
eggie (2021-05-11 10:40:16+00:00): office=company kun je dan bijvoegen op de adresnode  .. craft wordt niet zichtbaar op de kaart.
eggie (2021-05-11 10:44:21+00:00): Als voorbeeld even alles op de adresnode gezet ter Leering ende Vermaeck
incl phone en website..
Dus geen bedrijven op de gebouwomtrek zetten.
gr eggie
Paavobave (2021-05-11 20:24:14+00:00): 👍
eggie (2021-05-11 10:37:13+00:00): Dag Ytrog

Het kan zo wel, maar beter is het om op de adresnoxde bij te taggen. Dan is adres gekoppeld aan de info.

Mapse,
eggie
حبيشان (2021-05-11 14:33:57+00:00): Please revert the change of Arabic Name of the gulf let the Arabic name for Arabs. OpenStreetMap not site for history and historic names.
user_11418917 (2021-05-11 16:44:31+00:00): @حبيشان I just reverted his vandal edit.               
This is his 7th account I believe, OSM blocks him and he made new accounts just to do this edit.            
The problem is that he not just the general name tag that should be left in peace but he change the name:ar tag too! and that's a big problem.         
He's doing this for the past week! every day! I'm sick of it. I just can't monitor this everyday! I really hope to stop this edit war spam vandalism thing! I'm done! 
Currently I'm monitoring some cities for new spam and low quality edits. I'm just done! this have to be end!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104505170
user_11418917 (2021-05-11 17:12:06+00:00): Just added the Persian name as an alt_name to try stopping the vandalism edits. lets hope this edit war ends...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104505170
literan (2021-05-11 16:04:29+00:00): access=no это когда никому нельзя перемещаться. Не думаю, что по улице в коттеджном поселке запрещено перемещаться его резидентам и их гостям. Откачу правку.
Kovoschiz (2021-05-17 10:32:05+00:00): Please don't upload test edit. This is vandalism.
eggie (2021-05-11 11:07:49+00:00): Dag M-  
Alles is lastig in het begin.. 
Kijk even hier. Dan zie je wat je hebt gedaan
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=104505421

Je pad eindigt op de landuse forest. Dat routeert niet, het moet op het pad eindigen. 
Een ander wandelpad zit geplakt aan het bos. Dat gebeurt al snel met editor iD  Gebruik de linker alttoets bij intekenen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-11 11:13:28+00:00): pad even  losgemaakt van landuse en doorverbonden met highway=track
gr eggie
iandees (2021-05-11 13:37:00+00:00): Hi! I'm a little worried that the map you're sourcing these changes from is old. The Graduate Hotel changed away from a Radisson Hotel several years ago. Also, the building name changes you made are incorrect in a few spots. Can you share what map you looked at for these changes?
kondokum (2021-05-12 13:11:58+00:00): Hi Iandees,
Thanks for providing the feedback. I made the edits based on the following source (https://gustavus.edu/mlc/ISLHHS/ISLHHS/UMN_Maps.html) from the university website. We got feedback from our delivery partners that few of the building names were missing in this university, hence using the map provided by the university I tried to update the building names. Do let me know if this is not accurate. I will make sure to correct my edits.

Regards,
kondokum
iandees (2021-05-12 13:17:06+00:00): That map is from 2010. Please use the official campus map here: https://campusmaps.umn.edu/
eggie (2021-05-11 11:11:03+00:00): Tip wanneer het een picnictafel is .. Dan leisure=picnic_table ipv tourism=picnic_site

Up to you.. 
eggie
SomeoneElse2 (2024-05-01 11:58:31+00:00): As with many of your other edits, you'd managed to duplicate an existing feature (now a footpath, formerly a railway) in the wrong place, possibly because you have never actually been there and are relying on poor quality aerial imagery.
I've corrected this example of the problem in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150746211 but there are many others along this line.
Mauls (2024-08-06 14:12:09+00:00): As with the other edits you’ve commented on, this was from over 3 years ago. I’ve taken the advice on board quite some time ago. I’m not sure what purpose repeatedly making this exact same point on quite old edits serves?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-25 14:06:39+00:00): Probably because data damage remains unfixed?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-25 14:10:37+00:00): And "but there are many others along this line" is a polite suggestion to you to fix this damage.

So to be more specific: I am asking you to repair this problem, and to delete railway lines you added to OSM that nowadays are utterly gone without any traces.