piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jarek 🚲 (2018-07-16 19:30:09+00:00): Hello,

Is this a joke?

Does Telenav do QA?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8095700 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8095686 "Lane South West Lisgar" when it should be "South Afton West Lisgar" after your scheme
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26103731 "Lane North Alma eAST Dufferin"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8095682 "Lane North Queen East Northcore" which should be Northcote
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462584208 "Lane East dufferin South Stonehouse" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149593024 "Lane North WQueen west Markham" capitalization, spelling
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10187164 "Lane North WQueen west Markham" capitalization, spelling
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22788372 "Lane 1 South dundas West Euclid" capitalization, not to mention there isn't a Lane 2 so why Lane 1?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22795625 "Lane South dundas West Manning" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8099875 "Lane East Crowford North Adelaide" spelling, it's Crawford
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30840826 "Lane East Portland south Queen" inconsistent capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118626499 "Lane East Bathurust North Wolseley" spelling
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83327382 "Lane East Ohara North Maple Grove" spelling, the avenue name is "O'Hara"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81139241 "Lane North Queen East Ohara Avenue" spelling, use of "Avenue" inconsistent with your other format
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81139375 "Lane 2 S Dundas E Palmerston" suddenly inconsistent format - why? because you copied from the "note" from initial CanVec import?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81139255 "Lane E Brock S Earnbridge" same
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146987567 "Lane North Dundas West ritchie" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26140020 "Lane North Dewson west ossington" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26140018 "Lane South Hepbourne West ossington" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23225347 "Lane North Dundas east Golden" capitalization
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26103808 "Lane SWest Dufferin South Florence" what is "SWest"

This is why we prefer to have local mappers do mapping! Your company is making a bad name for itself through these edits. Why are we doing QA for you? Why should I fix it for you rather than revert these descriptive names wholesale?
lorandr_telenav (2018-07-17 11:33:10+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for drawing my attention to the mistakes, those were some of my first edits. I corrected them all and I also looked around the area. The source I used was Geobase Roads.
Thank you for your message,
RoterEmil (2017-01-01 12:50:47+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM,
I found your camping_site-adding in Berlin. According to this webpage http://www.reisemobilstation.com/index.php/en.html the camping-site is closed for exactly one year.
Can we delete this camping-site?

bye
geodreieck4711 (2016-12-30 09:15:03+00:00): wenn man mit Multipolygonen nur so um sich wirft, sollte man gefälligst auch wissen was man tut. Offensichtlich fehlt dir das Verständnis von korrekten Multipolygonen.
Du kannst nach 24 Stunden immer auf z.B.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.99539&lat=50.27393&zoom=11 deine Fehlkonstruktionen begutachten.
Habe mir die Freiheiheit genommen, das zu korrigieren.....
ild_inr (2016-12-29 14:50:17+00:00): s
user_7622 (2017-07-25 19:26:10+00:00): Hallo Aalen1

Du warst der letzte, der den man_made=adit 'Tiefer Stollen' ein paar Meter neben der fast gleich getaggten Einfahrt der Bahn (und damit dem Mundloch) angefasst hat. Meiner Meinung nach könnte der südlichere der beiden Punkte doch weg, oder?
Aalen1 (2017-07-28 22:30:45+00:00): Hallo 
Du hast recht!
Es gibt da nur einen Eingang!
Grüße 
      Aalen1
ElliottPlack (2016-12-29 18:37:11+00:00): Thanks for the hard work! Most people don't use the older riverbank tag anymore, so I usually convert them when I see them. The natural = water and water = river scheme is more flexible because it supports access tagging, such as boat = no.
ElliottPlack (2016-12-29 18:42:41+00:00): The other issue is that these riverbanks are all just overlapping polygons, not relations, so you cannot have an island or show any relationships. I can fix it for ya and show the difference.
ElliottPlack (2016-12-29 18:44:44+00:00): Sorry my apologies, you were using the water scheme correctly, the marley creek portion has the riverbank portion. Just looking at the data now.
trigpoint (2016-12-29 18:04:38+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Shiprow 15 is a very odd name for a hotel, however 15 Shiprow is the address of the Ibis which is already mapped. I have removed your duplication as it is in the wrong place
kreuzschnabel (2019-04-23 14:15:55+00:00): Tach, bitte bei opening_hours immer ans „PH off“ denken, wenn feiertags zu ist. Nach deinem Tagging hätten die Läden gestern offen gehabt :)
Cachologe (2019-04-23 14:24:55+00:00): ok, werd's mir merken.
Frans S (2019-10-09 16:48:25+00:00): Hello Jasper

There are new features in iDeditor which helps to improve the quality of your work.

Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu? When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it.
Please read these articles about correcting work and offset ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
PT-53 (2016-12-30 10:00:42+00:00): Hallo pretzel12,
Du hast jetzt 3 verschiedene Objekte in einen Node zusammengepackt. Das ist falsch. Das sind 3 ganz verschiedene Dinge und sollten auch getrennt getaggt werden!
Das Kreuz steht doch z.B. nicht auf der Sitzbank.
Grüße und einen guten Rutsch
geodreieck4711 (2016-12-30 09:19:19+00:00): wieder ein nicht korrektes MP....

Ein inner darf sich nicht mit dem outer überschneiden oder deckungsgleich sein....
Jakka (2016-12-29 20:33:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93064538#map=13/51.1703/5.1849
het gebied residential zou ik geen naam geven daar er al een admin boundary is aangemaakt. Je genereert 2X de naam Balen
maraf24 (2017-01-03 15:55:40+00:00): Zastanawiam się nad polskimi skwerami, gdy mapowałem place jako place=square we Wrocławiu i doszedłem do wniosku, że to są jednak inne obiekty. Prawie zawsze daje się je zmapować jako leisure=common/park/grass i place=square jest wg mnie wówczas zbędny jeśli nie błędny.
Sam tylko raz użyłem go dla skweru, gdy nie miałem innej opcji: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448641708

Myślę, że trzeba by doprecyzować, co uważać będziemy za place=square :)
kocio (2017-01-03 16:07:36+00:00): To już omawiajmy na forum, dobrze? =}
Hjart (2016-12-29 19:48:28+00:00): Jeg har rullet denne ændring tilbage idet jeg i mellemtiden havde rettet data her og Maps.me's offlinedata derfor ikke længere var aktuelle.
aceman444 (2021-03-07 22:12:22+00:00): Zdravim, ak zakaz vjazdu do arealu bani, tak nie 'permissive', ale 'private'. A ked 'vjazdu', tak 'vehicle=', potom nemusite davat vynimku na 'foot'. 'vehicle' zahrna aj bicykle, tie ste ale povolili, tak snad je to na tej informacnej tabuli tak uvedene. To zachovam.
muralito (2016-12-30 01:03:03+00:00): Daniel, un alpine_hut es un refugio en las montañas. No existe en tal cosa en Uruguay.
¿Que fue lo que quisiste mapear?
mueschel (2016-12-31 14:30:03+00:00): Hi, 
could you check this node?
The tag 'pl:Sieruciowce =administrative' looks like a mistake.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31519348

Cheers, Jan
Władysław Komorek (2016-12-31 16:05:30+00:00): Fixed.
Jakka (2016-12-29 20:27:27+00:00): Kleine update volgens wikilijst.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:BelgianChainStores:D
Alecs01 (2017-01-06 13:14:29+00:00): Please do not add personal information to the map, thanks.
jn0 (2016-12-30 17:06:44+00:00): "Sberbank" again. Why???
Commodoortje (2016-12-30 07:20:13+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-30 07:20:31+00:00): Inmiddels kleine aanpassing verricht
canfe (2022-08-01 10:17:36+00:00): Noto che in zona hai mappato parecchi muri di cortile, ma in modo molto approssimativo.
Come mai? Poi hai smesso.
Da cosa è nato questo "progetto" poi non finito?
smaprs (2016-12-29 22:25:58+00:00): Thank you, and sorry
MarcoR (2017-03-18 17:47:26+00:00): Why did you changed place=square to highway=residential + area=yes ; according to wiki highway=residential shouldn't be used on areas¹

¹ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential
AdVerburg (2017-01-26 09:31:46+00:00): motorroad=yes houdt in Nederland in dat voetgangers, fietsers, landbouwverkeer, vee enz. er niet op mogen, en auto's wel. Het is dus overbodig om die tags erbij te zetten. JOSM klaagt daarover, dus toen ik aan busroute 20 bezig was heb ik die (overbodige) tag weggedaan.
M.v.g. Ad Verburg
Bonix-Mapper (2017-01-03 05:12:30+00:00): Olá,

Se o horário de funcionamento é de segunda a sábado o correto seria :
openning_hours=Mo-Sa 10:00-22:00
marc__marc (2021-03-19 06:56:09+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1656945781
je ne comprend pas les tags d'accès :
c'est une entrée pour tout le monde ou que pour les employés ?
parce que si c'est pour tout le monde, cela me semble sans intérêt et confus d'ajouter le nom de toute les compagnies pouvant l'utiliser
Cordialement,
Marc
simon_geovelo (2021-03-22 14:13:23+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est effectivement sans intérêts . Je viens de supprimer les tags.
Simon de Geovelo
Basia | Yanosik (2017-01-30 09:37:53+00:00): Cześć, zauważyłam, że utworzyłeś POI Mc'Donalds obok już istniejącego dokładnie takiego samego POI. Czy możesz zweryfikować która lokalizacja jest poprawna i ewentualnie usunąć jednego z fastfood'ów?
rickmastfan67 (2016-12-30 18:01:33+00:00): Pretty sure PA-8 shouldn't be classified as 'trunk' north of PA-28.  Should stay as 'primary' IMO (except for the freeway section right around the PA-28 interchange of course).
Alecs01 (2016-12-30 12:55:34+00:00): How can exist a viewpoint here? Please do not spam the map this way
opendcc (2016-12-29 19:28:13+00:00): +1
trigpoint (2016-12-29 19:19:37+00:00): Please remember that OSM is a public database, it should not be used for personal markers
GerdP (2017-10-14 09:53:29+00:00): Hi!
Please review unusual tag highway=historical on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462621213 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/441835222
Sat images don't show a highway, so they either existed a long time ago or maybe never?
In the first case I suggest historical=highway or highway=razed, in the 2nd case I think the ways should be removed.
GerdP (2017-10-14 09:54:40+00:00): oops, sorry, meant historic=highway
Palolo (2023-02-13 22:13:33+00:00): Do you have more information about Ngome kuu ya Tsunami yenye kasi Zaidi - CCM?
maraf24 (2017-01-02 23:54:06+00:00): Zniknął Plac Teatralny. W sensie nazwy.
To celowe?
kocio (2017-01-03 01:34:09+00:00): Tak, poprawiałem tagowanie na prawidłowe, a nie pod renderowanie. Po przekroczeniu 2000 użyć place=square szykuje się renderowanie nazw placów jako takich (a nie chodników czy uliczek parkingowych): https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2203
maraf24 (2017-01-03 12:17:52+00:00): To chyba jednak nie wyklucza dodawania nazwy do dróg, nawet jeśli są tylko dla pieszych?
Są  3 możliwości dla drogi idącej przez plac: ma ona nazwę placu, ma własną nazwę, nie ma nazwy. Jak jest oficjalnie tutaj ?
kocio (2017-01-03 12:23:05+00:00): Nie wyklucza, oczywiście, ale to by było w przypadku, gdyby plac był pieszy, a tak to jest tylko kawałek chodnika wchodzący w skład placu. Drogi parkingowe nie mają zwykle nazwy i tu też nie widzę uzasadnienia poza tym, żeby się wyświetlała nazwa - akurat pozostałe ulice na tym placu mają inne nazwy, choć w ogólności bywa różnie.
RicoElectrico (2017-01-03 12:35:07+00:00): A plac jest w TERYT?
kocio (2017-01-03 12:37:46+00:00): Nie mam pojęcia - nie przyszło mi nawet do głowy tego sprawdzić.
maraf24 (2017-01-03 15:24:41+00:00): Plac musi być w TERYT, bo ma on  punkty adresowe. 
Nazwa drogi była tu potrzebna, by mrówki nie wyskakiwały. Ale place=square też się do tego nadaje, trzeba by tylko go uwzględnić w kodzie.
RicoElectrico (2017-01-03 15:41:36+00:00): No nie wiem, w końcu przekonanie konsumentów danych do używania addr:place też spaliło na panewce :/
RicoElectrico (2017-01-03 15:42:03+00:00): A potem będzie jakie to OSM do dupy, bo nawi nie poprowadziła :P
kocio (2017-01-03 15:56:25+00:00): Z tym tagiem jest dobrze - nie dość, że szybko rośnie sam z siebie: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2203#issuecomment-245501660 i nie ma konkurencji, to jeszcze Włosi się właśnie biorą za to mocno: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-January/077290.html . Obrys placu jest tu: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462597687
RicoElectrico (2017-01-03 16:17:19+00:00): To może zawczasu powiadomić zainteresowanych z prośbą o implementację?
kocio (2017-01-03 16:20:18+00:00): Nie rozumiem, ale może przejdźmy już z tym na forum, bo to ogólny problem, a nie kwestia jednego placu, dobra?
maraf24 (2017-01-06 22:49:14+00:00): A tymczasem problem się rozwiązał...z mrówkami jeszcze nikt nie wygrał ;)
trigpoint (2016-12-29 19:27:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, thank you for your edit however are you sure it is a park, imagery suggests a school to me.
xWolfeBlitz (2016-12-29 21:03:46+00:00): Hiya yea its a park, there is a nursery there aswell but mainly its a public park
trigpoint (2016-12-29 21:51:06+00:00): Thank you, keep on adding to OSM.
Coalisland looks rather empty, there must be load of stuff to add. Schools, pubs, shops and stuff
literan (2016-12-30 12:30:22+00:00): Почитайте определение service=driveway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway Здесь этого и близко нет.
Josef73 (2023-05-12 04:43:31+00:00): Hello, can you please check the value of the tag opening_hours. It has to be in English. Please look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Thanks
GinaroZ (2016-12-29 20:22:00+00:00): Hi, never got round to adding the cliff so thanks for doing that. 
In case you're unaware, it seems like the Bing imagery tile covering this area is out of alignment. The OS Streetview data however aligns with GPS traces.
So if you've moved the parking/water to match with Bing, it's probably not correct.
FraserKp (2016-12-30 07:51:34+00:00): Hi there - thanks for the heads up. I did tweak the parking slightly based on bing but it looked pretty much aligned to the imagery already - but will check the OSSV data for sure to make sure. The main thing I didn't get resolved was the building geometry - Deep Sea World itself obviously mostly sits underneath the car park so not sure how best to represent this - the building mapped as-is is only a tiny portion of the place itself.
eggie (2017-02-26 09:51:41+00:00): Ik heb dat Fort de Roovere waar je de toponym in park hebt omgezet nu veranderd in place locality area yes en de naam. Mee eens? Het is meer een bos gebied. 
Groet,
eggie
AdVerburg (2017-02-26 11:32:23+00:00): Mee eens.
Mijn hoofdreden voor de verandering was het wegwerken van toponym, in combinatie met de naam (groot) zichtbaar op de kaart krijgen.
Maar de definitie van park in de wiki geeft "open green area", dus jouw oplossing is beter.
Groetend, Ad
eggie (2017-02-26 11:43:20+00:00): De naam zie je wel op de OFM, maar niet in de Mapnik. Een echt goede oplossing weet ik ook niet. Groet...eggie
marczoutendijk (2017-02-26 13:43:09+00:00): En de toponym is ook mistig in het gebruik en rendering:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56641
eggie (2017-02-26 14:13:00+00:00): Klopt..Discussie heb ik gevolgd. . het is nu ook een place=locality.. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44766664#map=19/51.52888/4.29985
Ook geen succes.. 
Van mij mag die hele voormalige toponym eraf. De naam van het fort staat immers  apart getagd.
Een park is het niet en je hebt alleen maar kans dat iemand er bv landuse =forest van maakt.
We moeten eigenlijk een tag hebben die de naam wat groter laat verschijnen en ook de lading dekt.
marczoutendijk (2017-02-26 15:28:46+00:00): Die toponym is een heel oude AND import en die klopt voor geen meter. Hij loopt dwars over allerlei andere landuses, wegen en gebieden heen. Dat ziet er voor mij niet echt functioneel uit en dekt de lading totaal niet.
eggie (2017-02-26 15:55:49+00:00): Ik haal 'm weg. Het fort is immers toch benoemd.
M!dgard (2017-01-09 10:15:52+00:00): Het residential landuse heeft zo af en toe een punt gemeen met wegen. (http://osm.org/go/0EhxPjUwn?m=) Het overlapt ook deels met water terwijl de contouren mooi zouden moeten aansluiten. (http://osm.org/go/0EhxibJ_X?m=)

Dit lijkt me een verandering die moeilijk is om met iD deftig te doen, JOSM is beter geschikt. Ik ben van plan het wat op te kuisen, maar ik vind niet waar die multipolygon waar je het over had verwijderd is. Weet jij dat?
Imergis (2017-01-09 10:25:31+00:00): Hallo M!dgard,

Je hebt gelijk, ik had deze polygonen wat netter willen intekenen, maar iD heeft daar wat beperkingen. Zelf ben ik niet vaardig met JOSM. Fijn dat je deze lijnen wat wilt verbeteren.

Helaas weet ik zelf ook niet wanneer en door wie de betreffende ‘corrupte’ multipolygoon is verwijderd. Ik zag in Mapnik dat het centrum van Brugge verkeerd renderde, dat was voor mij de aanleiding om dit te ‘repareren’.

Succes, en nogmaals dank voor de actie!
 JWvA (osm@imergis.nl)
M!dgard (2017-01-09 10:27:59+00:00): Dag JWvA

Bedankt voor de snelle reactie! Ik zal dan handmatig de lijnen verbeteren, vertrekkende van de huidige situatie.

Groeten,
M!dgard
M!dgard (2017-01-09 10:59:04+00:00): > Helaas weet ik zelf ook niet wanneer en door wie de betreffende ‘corrupte’ multipolygoon is verwijderd.

Dat komt doordat hij nog niet verwijderd was. :p
Met http://osm.org/changeset/45023270 heb ik dat net gedaan.
marcknj (2016-12-30 23:15:41+00:00): the motorway is open?
ValdrinGashi (2016-12-31 13:53:41+00:00): Yes, since 31.12.2016
Alecs01 (2017-01-05 13:56:14+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, the Arena is already on the map, please do not duplicate existing objects, thanks
dbf_ (2017-01-06 13:59:37+00:00): Добрый день,
просьба не использовать надписи ЗАГЛАВНЫМИ буквами в именах объектов.
Tomas Straupis (2016-12-30 08:52:34+00:00): historic=memorial is not suitable for tagging absolutely anything.
And bearusian names/descriptions should go to name:be and description:be tags.
New information was added not taking into account existing information, so duplicates have been created in some instances.
paleshukgeo (2016-12-30 09:29:47+00:00): I apologize. I did not have time to edit. I will make these changes in the near future. Thank you.
Alecs01 (2017-01-06 13:13:59+00:00): Please do not add personal information to the map, thanks.
literan (2016-12-30 11:30:50+00:00): Уважаемый Maxim Raykhrud, не надо обозначать дворы парками. Парк - это парк, а двор - это двор.
Maxim Raykhrud (2016-12-31 03:04:32+00:00): Хорошо, но что вы тогда предлагаете для обозначения зеленых зон? Тег Wood, используемый многими, явно еще более некорректен, так как предназначен для лесов. Если я не ошибаюсь, park предназначен как для полноценных парков, так и для скверов: "You might possibly mark a very small park with a node, but even for small parks it is more useful to draw in an area."
literan (2016-12-31 13:30:05+00:00): тег wood это не тег для лесов, а тег для любой древесной растительности. Да, именно его используют для отображения древесных насаждений - в лесах, парках, вдоль дорог, в дворах. Если насаждения кустарниковые - используют natural=scrub
literan (2016-12-31 13:30:52+00:00): а тег leisure=park используют для обозначения использования территории, в данном случае - для организованного отдыха.
Tomas Straupis (2016-12-30 08:53:41+00:00): Incorrect change of tagging. Reverted.
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:51:17+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462662631
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 13:19:37+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55426854
Carnildo (2016-12-29 23:07:31+00:00): Thanks for adding to the map!

A tip for better mapping: if a path meets a road, make sure the two are connected (the connection will show up as a grey dot in the editor).  This lets routing software know that it's possible to get from one to the other, and use the path when finding walking directions.
Warin61 (2018-10-10 04:07:02+00:00): Hi,

For Way: 462659048 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
Scrub is not a 'landuse', in OSM the tag to use is 'natural=scrub'.
rickmastfan67 (2016-12-30 18:02:46+00:00): Pretty sure PA-8 shouldn't be classified as 'trunk' north of PA-28.  Should stay as 'primary' IMO (except for the freeway section right around the PA-28 interchange of course).
Roadsguy (2016-12-30 19:26:15+00:00): I was planning on having PA 8 marked as trunk up to Butler, because it's part of the NHS and has relatively high traffic counts, and even the occasional interchange. However, if this goes against common practice, I'll change it back.
rickmastfan67 (2016-12-31 06:18:55+00:00): Well, I would have agreed with you on this if PA-8 had been built like US-22 is between I-76/I-376 & the freeway section before I-99.  But since the only divided segments seem to be around only major intersections, and the only interchanges it has are with PA-28, I-76, the partial one @ Bakerstown Rd, & the road to Alcoa in Butler, I personally honestly don't see it being worthy of the 'trunk' tag.  I've personally traveled along PA-8 & US-22 in both of the mentioned areas and can see major differences between the two that can justify the 'trunk' for US-22, but not for PA-8 IMO.
Владимир К (2016-12-30 09:21:22+00:00): вы хотели адрес добавить?
dan980 (2016-12-30 11:16:05+00:00): Occhio agli errori:
1. i nomi delle vie vanno sempre nel formato nome+cognome. Era corretto Piazza Antonio Gramsci
2. i numeri civici  sul lato ovest della way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354954538 sono in ordine progressivo 1-2-3-4-5-6-7. Chiaro indizio che si riferiscono ad una piazza, non ad una via. 
3. Sei proprio sicuro che nella strada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225797845/history si a presente una targa con scritto “Via del vecchio tabacchificio”? Nel PUC di Arborea non risulta, e nel sito non si trovano delibere relative a una tale intitolazione.
4. In Italia, ai sensi delle norme vigenti, i numeri civici vanno collocati sui punti della pubblica viabilità di accesso diretto o indiretto agli edifici. Se l’edificio è direttamente sulla via, i civici vanno sul muro (accesso diretto). Invece se una casa ha un cortile con un muretto, i numeri vanno sul cancelletto/apertura, non sulla porta (accesso indiretto). Es. Via Benedetto Croce, Via Luigi Einaudi 62
pyram (2016-12-30 15:42:31+00:00): 1. Maybe, but you cannot see it on the ground.
2. Maybe, but then there was a wrong sign to confuse the visitors ;-)
3. Yes. I added what I have seen on the ground!
4. Sorry, but I do not have know this. I have seen the adresses near the entrances (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3581987994) and I think it's helpfully to add the adress, where it can be found.

Some of the imported adresses doesn't exist in reality.

So I learned, OSM in Sardinia is a copy of official data - not what's the reality :-(
I wasted my spare time to add most of the street names in Arborea.
Excuse for helping.

pyram