piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
❤️‍🔥 (2021-02-04 07:06:11+00:00): the building name is signposted on-the-ground as Te Wharau o Tāmaki / Auckland House. It is the largest of many Auckland Council offices across the region. 

I would suggest naming the building Wharau o Tāmaki / Auckland House like the other offices (e.g. https://osm.org/way/380531534, https://osm.org/relation/3774811, https://osm.org/way/23906750)

If you think splitting the tags makes sense that sounds great. I'm not sure what the best way of tagging it is
NyanSten (2021-02-04 09:33:31+00:00): I agree. In this case, the building should be Auckland House and Auckland House should be either on a building:part or on a node. However, l was just checking it OTG now and only the tower should be a building, the rest is just a roof.

You can fix it if you want, or I can do it tomorrow.
NyanSten (2021-02-04 09:34:23+00:00): Correction: the building should be Auckland House and Auckland Council should be either …
Glassman (2021-02-04 18:59:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98672828
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-02-04 12:50:09+00:00): Ayrton, aqui você desenhou umas vias bem fora do que estão na realidade por exemplo essa:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903620843 , talvez porque voce utilizou uma camada desatualizada. No editor de mapa você olha no menu a sua direita, o 5º botão lá se chama configurações de fundo, lá você pode selecionar a camada Maxar que está mais atualizada. Obrigado.
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:09:17+00:00): #TIP: Opening hours are expressed as Mo-Su 07:00-15:00. Can you fix the opening hours tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98672881
DressyPear4 (2021-02-05 14:57:27+00:00): Olá, esse tipo de edição não se adequa ao osm, para isso use o 
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:11:00+00:00): #TIP: the road leading into the park is likely a service road. Unclassified are basically residential roads found in rural areas. If you agree this should be a service road, can you change the tags?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98673124
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:12:05+00:00): #TIP: These are usually tagged as landuse=quarry instead of industrial.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98673653
Sanniu (2021-02-04 16:37:30+00:00): Hello
It look like you added only empty lines over existing road network. Is this added by mistake?
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:13:56+00:00): #TIP: Each building should be mapped separately. You could change from building=yes to landuse=retail to fix the problem. Otherwise you'll end up with a really big building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98674026
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:14:32+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by just selecting the outline then type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98674158
aweech (2021-02-04 20:08:23+00:00): Hi,
What was your reasoning for deleting the driveway on Taft Street in this edit? Driveways are included in OpenStreetMap.
wambag (2021-03-06 11:13:29+00:00): Typically I only include private residential driveways when there is ambiguity as to which street the driveway comes off or it is long and/or serves two properties. Otherwise, if you draw one driveway, don't you then have to draw all driveways?
aweech (2021-03-06 16:32:03+00:00): Deleting other people's work (that's valid and with proper tags) isn't great. It was an Amazon Logistics added driveway, and they actually added it back in the intervening weeks, so they must have really wanted it. 

As for the idea of "if you draw one driveway, don't you then have to draw all the driveways", that's one of those things where it's helpful to remember that the database is a community project, and that everything doesn't have to be done all at once. You like to align roadways, and that's great. I like to map waterways and do TIGER clean-up, and that's great. There's a mapper in the Upper Valley who does go around mapping every driveway in neighborhoods, and that's great. Eventually, a mapper who likes adding driveways will come to Nashua and fill in the gaps :)
wambag (2021-03-08 07:44:53+00:00): If you like waterways, try mapping Salmon Brook in Nashua, especially where it crosses under Main Street. I worked with it a little, not sure if I got the spillway or the culvert located correctly. Also, its course as mapped is badly misaligned in places, and the brook and its tributaries cross roads and other features without bridges/tunnels.
aweech (2021-03-09 23:22:24+00:00): I spent some time with Salmon Brook and its tributaries. It did look like the polygons downstream of Main Street hadn't been touched much since the NHD import, so now those are much better. Unfortunately I couldn't find any resource that might reveal the exact path of the culvert under Main Street. I did remove a few points underneath the new park because curved culverts are not very common, so I think it's more likely that it's a bunch of ~25 yd pipes with angled joins. But otherwise the path you drew seems perfectly reasonable. Feel free to adjust the polygons of course as you map. Trying to define the edge of a river like this is always fuzzy since it varies so much over time. There's even a new island in the river that isn't in the oldest imagery.
user_5359 (2021-02-04 04:37:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please.
jleedev (2021-02-04 14:00:30+00:00): Why was this trailhead deleted? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8001839083
boopington (2021-02-05 03:22:54+00:00): is that what i deleted? my bad
jleedev (2021-02-11 22:02:50+00:00): Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98935376

It goes without saying that you should be more careful.
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:18:26+00:00): #TIP: if the path is paved, it's probably should be tagged as highway=footway. A path is more like a unpaved trail you'd find hiking.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98675793
ovruni (2021-02-04 04:24:54+00:00): Hola AnaisMarcos, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado una vía a track, sin embargo en la documentación de la etiqueta menciona que son caminos para fines agrícolas o carriles forestales. Hay mayor detalle en la sección "Cuándo usar highway=track y cuándo usar otro valor" de la documentación https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Saludos
AnaisMarcos (2021-02-04 05:59:01+00:00): Ok, disculpe y gracias.
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:21:34+00:00): #TIP: save the address tags as a node. The address is likely to stay the same.

Did they actually remove the building? If it's still there, just remove the Red Robin tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98676467
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:21:59+00:00): Same comment as prior one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98676545
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:23:02+00:00): #TIP: Instead of deleting the building then redrawing it, just change the tags. This save the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98676928
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-04 21:38:16+00:00): Would this technically be a driveway instead of an unclassified road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98676953
compdude (2021-02-15 01:54:57+00:00): Again, why is this primary? At first glance, this looks like a trunk to me.
nevw (2021-02-04 06:33:34+00:00): Hi
the tag highway=rest_area is used for parking areas along highways, mostly with facilities like shelter, toilets, water. I have deleted that tag from the internet access in the shopping centre.
andi9876 (2021-02-09 01:20:33+00:00): del
andi9876 (2021-02-09 01:19:03+00:00): deleted
Dimacn (2021-02-13 18:08:57+00:00): У вас критичные ошибки в статусах дорог. Пожалуйста изучите классификацию дорог в OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
Miroff (2021-02-13 12:13:23+00:00): Добрый день! В этой правке вы понизили статус дороги с tertiary на service. Вместе с паромной переправой это дорога обуспечивает связь между долиной Чулышмана и Артыбашем. Поэтому она не может быть ниже tertiary. Обратите внимание что в OSM статус дороги не зависит от ее покрытия и состояния, только от того какие объекты она соединяет. Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с принятыми в сообществе соглашениями и исправьте то, что вы поменяли в этой и соседней правках https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification
user_5359 (2021-02-04 16:41:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your objects please have a look on http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shop (see https://www.osm.org/way/894383240)
Dimacn (2021-02-13 18:03:26+00:00): Пожалуйста, скажите, почему вы изменили статус дороги? Вы знаете где используется highway=service ? Пожалуйста изучите сначала классификацию дорог в OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
tastrax (2021-02-20 22:56:38+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:34:05+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98680727
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:35:04+00:00): Why did you remove the city and state from the address? The state isn't really needed but the city is the postal city which isn't always the same as where it's located.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98680904
pesec (2021-02-05 04:23:46+00:00): Что вы хотели показать данной правкой?
Здесь точка пошива одежды?
Это название магазина?
Где тогда само здание?
abakus_uploader (2021-02-04 23:31:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-02-04 10:17:49+00:00): Hello Chiricahua. According to the osm wiki residential roads serve as an access to housing, without function of connecting settlements. This road is obviously a direct connection of the village of Toril to the greater road network. Further this road also connects to the villages of Libuak, Cogon, San Antonio so tertiary seems to be the appropriate classification.
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-02-04 10:26:20+00:00): Same goes for way 903660336. While it might be difficult to assess from aerial imagery alone, on the ground this is clearly a tertiary road.
Chiricahua (2021-02-05 22:42:33+00:00): Hi Timmy_Tesseract, Thank you for pointing this out, and after further review I agree with your suggestions. I’ve updated these roads to tertiary.
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-02-16 23:11:26+00:00): Good day ruthikdhoni, 

Ways 487023332, 666813290, 871160306 and 871160306 are all very rough unpaved road sections that are barely passable by cars. Tertiary really doesn't seem like the right choice. 

Way 173057391 on the other side connects the barangay proper of Kilate to the greater network and should therefore be tagged as tertiary according to the Philippines mapping conventions. 

Assessing the classification of roads can be difficult from aerial imagery alone. Before up- or downgrading please check way histories to see if existing classifications might have been sourced from on the ground surveys.
user_11498075 (2021-02-17 05:51:00+00:00): Hi Timmy_Tesseract,

Thanks for the info
Please I have doubt that can tertiary end on unclassified plz check this way 105874155
and made the above corrections
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-02-17 18:38:15+00:00): Thanks for the revert. Tertiary roads transitioning to unclassified are very common, especially in mountainous areas. Usually there is a lot of traffic from villages downwards towards the city, but almost no traffic to the farms further uphill or to villages that are on the other side of steep river valleys.
TheNet1996 (2021-02-06 09:01:36+00:00): Servus abgolo,
willkommen bei OSM und Danke, dass du die Karten mit verbessern möchtest.
Eine kurze Frage: Woher stammt der Name "Wiesenbergele"? Ist der Weg tatsächlich so ausgeschildert? Im offiziellen Straßenverzeichnis der Stadt Augsburg konnte ich den Namen nicht finden.
Danke & Viele Grüße
Mike
abgolo (2021-02-06 09:34:49+00:00): Ich weiß, dass der Weg nicht mehr beschildert ist, seit der Bahnhof umgebaut wurde. Früher hieß der so und war auch mit einem Schild versehen. Meine Großeltern und meine Mutter haben ganz in der Nähe gewohnt und meine Mutter hat mir den (früheren) Namen bestätigt.
daganzdaanda (2021-02-14 22:36:15+00:00): Hi, 
für ehemalige Namen gibt es noch ein besseres Tag: old_name=*
Manchmal könnte auch "lokaler Name" loc_name=* gut passen, wenn z.B. viele Leute den Namen noch benutzen, obwohl er nicht mehr ausgeschildert ist.
Beides wird auf der Standard-Karte leider nicht gerendert, aber die Suchfunktion findet auch diese Namen.
TheNet1996 (2021-02-19 18:26:22+00:00): Hallo zusammen,
ich präferiere auch den Tag old_name=* zu verwenden, da vor Ort keine entsprechende Beschilderung (mehr) vorhanden ist.
Viele Grüße
Mike
abgolo (2021-02-20 12:14:53+00:00): Danke Euch, ich habe den Weg jetzt mit old_name hochgeladen.
Glassman (2021-02-04 19:31:27+00:00): Can you explain why you removed the buildings instead of just adding a landuse around the complex?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98682368
CaptainCrunch (2021-02-06 22:22:18+00:00): Hallo jochen_a,
Danke für deine Mitarbeit, du hast ja einige Wege ergänzt. Als name= hast du aber etwas eingetragen, das jeweils nicht der Name des Weges sein dürfte, sondern eher einer Wanderroute. Diese Information (Weg gehört zu einer Route) solltest du in einer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route zusammenfassen (im Fall eines Wanderwegs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route%3Dhiking) und das name-Tag des einzelnen Wegabschnitts unverändert (leer) lassen.
Viele Grüße,
Cpt Crunch
eggie (2021-02-04 07:02:14+00:00): Please don't change buildings in OSM
Don't look at the roofshape. That's not the right spot.
All buildings are import from the Dutch Kadaster.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-02-04 06:55:27+00:00): Guy,

Kijk niet naar de dakvorm..  Alle gebouwen zijn ingemeten en geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) 
Een luchtfoto vertekend. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-04 06:56:57+00:00): Voeg access=private of customers toe svp.
MVG
eggie
Hjart (2021-03-19 14:54:33+00:00): Please note that there's really no point in intrically mapping around the growth in the river here. That's not where the riverbank actually is.
Annobon (2021-03-23 09:29:16+00:00): Hi Hjart, thank you for the feedback! I took a look at the Terrain shadow map here and can see some of those areas where I aligned to vegetation. I’ll make those fixes, thanks again!
abakus_uploader (2021-02-04 23:31:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mariotomo (2021-05-26 19:05:25+00:00): hola. espero sigas mapeando, no te he visto más en los log ni en el grupo … te comento aquí en forma de saludo y de sugerencia: el edificio 903677822 es muy probablemente un https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_breeding.  etiquetarlo en más detalle mejora la utilidad de OSM.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-04 14:56:43+00:00): Please check that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903219716/ is Area 1E, not Site 1E1.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-04 14:57:09+00:00): `is_in:*=` is not deprecated when there's not `boundary=administrative`
StefanHRT (2021-02-04 08:52:05+00:00): Hallo klnkengi,
Ich hatte mich bzgl. des Weges auch gewundert, aber der ist in der offiziellen Route des Senats drin. evtl. ein Pausenpunkt/Sightseeing? Hier ist einmal die offizielle Route des Senats als Upload in OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/StefanHRT/traces/3564569 Gruß
klnkengi (2021-02-04 17:17:47+00:00): Hi, das halte ich tendenziell für einen Fehler in der offiziellen Route. Vor Ort ist jedenfalls nicht erkennbar, dass dieser Weg zur Radroute gehören soll. Viele Grüße
StefanHRT (2021-02-04 17:37:20+00:00): Ok, denn Sorry, das ich es beim Abgleich mit einbezogen hatte. Achso, habe eben mal versucht mehr rauszufinden, aber im Flyer ist da auch nichts richtig erkennbar außer eine Markierung. Vielleicht wirst Du ja daraus schlauer. https://www.berlin.de/sen/uvk/_assets/verkehr/verkehrsplanung/radverkehr/radrouten/tr1_westspange.pdf Gruß
klnkengi (2021-02-04 19:18:36+00:00): Alles gut. Dier Markierung im Flyer kennzeichnet m.E. nur die Abschnitte, auf die sich die Kilometer-Angaben beziehen. lg
StefanHRT (2021-02-05 09:22:39+00:00): Ah ok, Danke für die Aufklärung. Gruß
Ebrahim Nejati (2021-02-04 07:57:24+00:00): You have an unclosed multipolygon in your changeset. Please change it accordingly.
NFZANMNIM (2021-02-04 07:59:10+00:00): Thank you for noting this. I am doing Landuse around Shadegan in stages, so I'll fix that in my next set of edits.
osmviborg (2021-02-04 08:56:33+00:00): Hej. I kommunes verden er den sydlige del af vejen allerede nedlagt, den er ikke længere navngivet. Den nordlige del hedder stadig Ny Harløsevej, hvilket også er adressen på bla. gården. Den planlagte vej der går vest om gården kommer til at hedde Præstedamsvej. Jeg har rettet din opdatering, der var også et par generelle fejl.
Lars Christensen (2021-02-04 09:09:09+00:00): Hej, 
Når man kommer fra Hillerød og skal til den sydlige del af Skævinge, så bliver man af GPS'en ledt af den vej forbi gården. Som lokalkendt ved man at man skal fortsætte ligeud og dreje senere. Men bruger man kort, så bliver man ledt denne vej. Derfor ville jeg gerne lave en rettelse. Evt. således at der er en midlertidig spæring evt?
osmviborg (2021-02-04 09:15:02+00:00): Vejen er tagget med 'access=no'. Der går en tid før det rammer navigationprogrammer der bruger OSM data som kilde.
marc__marc (2022-09-01 21:50:48+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2622093705
quel source avez-vous utilisé pour étendre la route à cet endroit ?
les 2 changeset renseigne Bing et cadastre mais encore aujourd'hui ni Bing ni le cadastre ne montre un route jusqu'à cet endroit.
Cordialement,
Marc
bkr (2021-02-08 22:33:15+00:00): Hi,
Willkommen auf OpenStreetMap, und danke, dass du die Gedenkorte eingetragen hast. Ich denke aber, sie sind nicht ganz richtig getaggt. Das was du verwendet hast (place of worship) ist eher für Kirchen uä gedacht. Ich denke passender ist historic=memorial.
(Da es hier aber unerwünscht ist, Dinge "aus der Ferne" zu ändern, würde ich das ungerne machen, sondern vorschlagen, dass du es änderst.)
!bm (2021-02-10 22:21:51+00:00): Hallo PeterPeterson10367,
hallo bkr,

auf den angegebenen Websites findet sich nur bei einem ein Hinweis auf einen anscheinend inoffiziellen(?) Gedenkstein, der 2018 sofort wieder geschändet und entwendet wurde. Ist da nun irgendetwas Verifizierbares vor Ort? Da abgesehen von getaggten website=* nicht angegeben: Gibt es evt weitere Quellen/Belege für Mahnmale/Kunstwerke, um ein passendes Tagging abzuleiten?

--besteGrüße!bm
!bm (2021-03-10 21:53:29+00:00): Mangels Antwort und aus (hier wie im Cs) genannten Gründen revertiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100803136
Luzandro (2021-02-11 19:27:52+00:00): Hallo,
zu allgemeinen Fragen wirst du im Forum wohl mehr Leute erreichen: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=89
Deine Frage dürfte auch abgeschnitten worden sein, ich verstehe zumindest nicht, was gemeint war
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98688909
Margue_2 (2021-02-14 08:42:46+00:00): Danke. Hat mir schon jemand beantwortet. Aber es kann jetzt sein, dass ich das "Schließen" der Diskussion nicht ordnungsgemäß schaffe. Falls du das in dem Fall machen könntest, wäre ich dankbar.
UNGSC-cronoser (2021-02-04 08:12:17+00:00): it's related with changeset 3857608 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/3857608#map=17/-3.47452/28.71784
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:51:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
4004 (2021-02-08 00:26:54+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правки.
поставил точку блок
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Mex (2021-02-04 09:37:53+00:00): Should this be a driveway?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98691145
mounicb (2021-02-05 11:28:08+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have misinterpreted the highway tag and added a service road. Thanks for the headsup. Please find the changeset (98764433) for the suggested modification. Always happy to learn from the community.
compdude (2021-02-15 01:54:23+00:00): Can you please make more descriptive changeset descriptions? I have absolutely no idea what this means. It really doesn't take that long....