piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
abrensch (2022-02-10 16:30:36+00:00): Hallo geo-d,

hier ist aber jetzt ein Loch in der Tegernseher Strasse:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159491262

Schaut Du mal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
geo-d (2022-02-10 18:12:39+00:00): Hallo Arndt,

vielen Dank für Deine Rückmeldung. Das Problem besteht bei der Fahrtroute gemäß des GTFS-Datensatzes der Münchner Verkehrsgesellschaft, die über die (unterbrochene) Straße führt. Die Fahrtroute in der OSM-Relation führt über die Tramtrasse parallel zur Straße und ist somit nicht von der Unterbrechung betroffen. Ich werde demnächst die Situation vor Ort anschauen (Welche Route stimmt? Gibt es diese Baustelle noch?).

Viele Grüße

geo-d
geo-d (2022-02-12 18:46:14+00:00): Survey-Rückmeldung:
Baustelle existiert nicht mehr, Fahrtroute der Busse war in OSM korrekt dargestellt und im GTFS-Datensatz fehlerhaft.
Gruß
geo-d
Frans S (2022-02-04 11:02:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
Please solve the issues iDeditor shows before you upload your mappings. 
you map highways to a settlement but forget to connect them to each other 
Best regards and keep mapping
ottwiz (2022-02-03 22:50:35+00:00): Hey RunTrails, I want to say that Bing has way newer imagery in the area which is on the quality as Esri World Clarity(or maybe better regarding resolution), and I checked the landcover to the newest Bing 2020 imagery (according to the metadata it was taken during summer of 2020, I checked in JOSM), and there's some wood cut down since 2011(Esri World Imagery Clarity is that really old). Also, there is the lower quality NAIP from 2020 if good quality Bing imagery is not available. 

If you're still working on the area, then please realign the landcover to either Bing or NAIP imagery.

Another thing, I'd recommend using JOSM for mapping forest landcover, it's usually much faster to do it.

Oh yeah, I don't know if you heard about the OSM US Slack community, but if you haven't, then please consider joining it, so if there is an issue or information, it's easier to communicate there: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

But otherwise, you're doing an awesome work! Keep it up! Just please consider my suggestions.
RunTrails (2022-02-04 01:57:03+00:00): I see splotches here and there of missing forest in Mapbox and the other ESRI but my POV is that unless it's clearly a new farm field or housing development I'll assume it was just lumber farming and will grow back.
Also I've had bad alignment experiences with Bing so I rarely look at it unless desperate.
ottwiz (2022-02-04 07:14:00+00:00): Alright, I see. Yes, I can agree on the bad alignment part. In West Virginia it's weird. In Summers County it has a bad alignment compared to NAIP, but in Mingo County it has a really good alignment. It varies a lot.
ottwiz (2022-02-04 07:15:18+00:00): Another thing i'd consider adding though later: inner residential/farmyard polygons where it's clearly visible that it's not a forest.
ottwiz (2022-02-04 08:22:32+00:00): "Another thing i'd consider adding though later: inner residential/farmyard polygons where it's clearly visible that it's not a forest."
Oh, OK, I noticed that you already started. Nice. I also helped you out a bit at parts but not at the whole
SomeoneElse (2022-02-04 08:34:34+00:00): Hello Andy Parton and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
Please don't just use the changeset comment "Solar Mountain Gaming - Golf Edits" every time - in more detail what you are actually doing.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for details.
Best Regards,
Andy
fabiotofy (2022-02-04 07:08:10+00:00): MTB non può essere il nome del tracciato. Piuttosto se vuoi indicare la sua percorribilità in bicicletta sfrutta i tag "mtb:scale" dove quì trovi la guida al loro utilizzo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:mtb:scale
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116981756
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
SekeRob (2022-02-04 09:34:56+00:00): Hi

Please pay attention to the roles of small areas in large areas. Here changed a dozen+ in the forest from outer to inner. You recognise this in ID Editor when the trees show inside the grass and bare rock for instance. Try it out and alternate the forest role on a grass patch from inner to outer to inner. Bare rock will show as light gray if tagged correctly.

cheers.
ToniE (2022-02-05 15:55:26+00:00): Servus Jona124

es existieren nun noch 2 Route-Master für die C13.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/DE-Bahnverkehr-Analysis.html#light_rail_C13

Viele Grüße,
Toni
Klumbumbus (2022-02-12 13:34:42+00:00): Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117321573 (zweiten route master gelöscht und beide Richtungen nun in einem router master)
Jordi MF (2022-02-03 22:49:46+00:00): Quería decir "área de acera...".
lapushkin (2022-02-03 22:58:36+00:00): Нормально ли перечислять в ключе craft значения через запятую? Если нет, то что с этим делать? Там на вывеске написано: «Ремонт одежды и обуви».
user_5359 (2022-03-14 11:21:30+00:00): Hallo! Wenn der Secondhand-Shop jetzt wieder raus ist, könnte man dann den Tag 	second_hand=yes doch ebenfalls entfernen, oder?
juhbi (2022-03-14 11:36:59+00:00): Ja, allerdings… habe ich gerade mal gemacht. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
ma-rt-in (2022-02-08 17:55:19+00:00): Hallo,

warum hast du die operator zusatz tags entfernt an node 26342789 ?

vg
sundew (2022-02-09 13:46:02+00:00): Hallo Martin!
Ganz einfach: ich halte diese von dir so genannten Zusatztags beim Operator für redundant und überflüssig. Es braucht keinen Direktlink vom Operator ins Wiki. Das sollte vielmehr über einen auf den Objekttyp bezogenes brand (z.B. brand=Deutsche Post-Briefkasten oder brand=Nordbrief-Briefkasten) plus ggf. brand:wikidata=* erfolgen. Ähnlich wie bei Parcel-Locker z.B. brand=Amazon-Locker. Mehr nicht! In den Wikidata selbst steht dann die Weiterverlinkung auf die Operator-Wikiseite...
Aber unabhängig vom Taggingschema halte ich es für bedenklich, dass derzeit etliche Leute mit ihren Apps unterwegs sind und einfach Objekte - ohne sie wirklich zu kontrollieren - mit Tags vollspammen. Es wird kein check_date gesetzt/aktualisiert, es werden an vielen Stellen keinerlei Korrekturen an Leerungszeiten, Referenzadressen etc. vorgenommen. So geht das einfach nicht.
Bei Objekten, die ich seit vielen Jahren regelmäßig vor Ort prüfe, gestatte ich mir somit, bei der jeweils nächsten Kontrolle unnötigen Wildwuchs zu beseitigen. Ähnliches hast du ja in der Vergangenheit auch mit Bushaltestellen getan, richtig?
LG M.
Glassman (2022-02-04 03:15:49+00:00): Thanks for adding the woods to OSM. I've been putting off working on adding woods so I'm glad to see you step forward. Now only a few hundred million more square miles to go :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116983368
platypii (2022-02-04 21:33:59+00:00): :-) washington should be green
lapushkin (2022-02-03 23:08:45+00:00): Всё же град Московский — это микрорайон, а не город в составе Москвы, который указывается в адресе. Что, кстати, с этими городами делать? city=Москва, place=город?
Joseph R P (2022-02-04 06:46:49+00:00): Hello, me and my fellow Virginians are currently figuring out what exactly the trunk destinations of Virginia should be and are adding/removing places on the list: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Virginia/Trunk_destinations. You're welcome to share any feedback on the Wiki.

I retagged SR 606 back to trunk as it connects South Riding to Ashburn, Sterling, and Herndon.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-04 07:37:41+00:00): Ciao. Gli edifici presenti sono stati tutti importati dagli open data della Provincia di Biella. Vedo che li hai corretti tutti in modo molto molto approssimativo e sicuramente peggiore di quanto erano prima. Disegnare edifici è difficile, contrariamente alla comune credenza. Ripristinerò la situazione originaria. Ciao, Andrea
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 115525296, 115533351, 115535954, 115565234, 115628064, 115635250, 115636440, 115637117, 115692473, 115694571, 115695558, 115734985, 115735673, 115736765, 115737885, 115738302, 115776102, 115777314, 115817241, 115853463, 115901083, 115928642, 115928769, 115970432, 115971697, 116047069, 116047703, 116050485, 116052019, 116054124, 116054432, 116055258, 116055424, 116055496, 116063114, 116133267, 116182303, 116202365, 116202672, 116203080, 116203232, 116207232, 116207715, 116230401, 116232961, 116233382, 116235073, 116235403, 116236595, 116271400, 116271460, 116272916, 116315686, 116315776, 116324803, 116327701, 116327710, 116343941, 116413443, 116414464, 116415089, 116417650, 116419746, 116421018, 116423706, 116426034, 116453954, 116489316, 116540857, 116542753, 116543747, 116546542, 116548096, 116549963, 116553894, 116571553, 116606219, 116608653, 116617540, 116619941, 116621562, 116660391, 116661709, 116663611, 116664266, 116665699, 116666832, 116668020, 116669671, 116672204, 116677003, 116764276, 116765249, 116767303, 116767783, 116768044, 116769454, 116769789, 116770612, 116771144, 116772037, 116772246, 116774303, 116775385, 116776157, 116777370, 116779540, 116780772, 116781577, 116794484, 116795327, 116801323, 116801467, 116803112, 116803132, 116805615, 116806627, 116808557, 116808795, 116811392, 116812360, 116845587, 116848539, 116849379, 116855230, 116860016, 116861486, 116861775, 116864058, 116907810, 116909943, 116910628, 116911687, 116913723, 116917799, 116918328, 116919093, 116922008, 116940708, 116941106, 116941222, 116941552, 116941744, 116942158, 116943097, 116943372, 116944123.
Andrew Kvalheim (2022-02-16 16:26:57+00:00): Thanks for tagging this. I’ve moved the drinking fountain back to its original location. There some external tools that help to see where it was:

- https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/5739943927
- https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/5739943927
catdreamer (2022-02-17 04:43:11+00:00): 登山口建議標示highway=trailhead，另官方已有立石命名登山口，不宜再另增名稱
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-04 02:31:38+00:00): Please respond to your blocks on other accounts before attempting edits
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116985511
user_5359 (2022-02-06 17:56:15+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/relation/13757807. What ist the menaing of the tag TKG Norwichtown Commons LLC = City of Norwich?
jnighan (2022-02-06 18:07:45+00:00): Fixed!
Diacritic (2022-02-04 03:36:56+00:00): Hey Immortal Boredom!

Thanks for the edit around the McClelland Drive area! 

I noticed the way that you've modelled the roundabout at McClelland and Skye means that traffic from the forestry area can't go onto the roundabout; they would be forced to turn left. Would you be able to link the road with the roundabout junction?

It has also left a traffic island node sitting on it's own that can probably be deleted. :)

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116986338
phidauex (2022-02-04 03:54:17+00:00): Hi, I see you are working on highway classifications in CO. If you would, take a moment to review the trunk proposals on the CO wiki to see what has consensus and is still up for discussion. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Colorado/Highway_Classification
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 115525296, 115533351, 115535954, 115565234, 115628064, 115635250, 115636440, 115637117, 115692473, 115694571, 115695558, 115734985, 115735673, 115736765, 115737885, 115738302, 115776102, 115777314, 115817241, 115853463, 115901083, 115928642, 115928769, 115970432, 115971697, 116047069, 116047703, 116050485, 116052019, 116054124, 116054432, 116055258, 116055424, 116055496, 116063114, 116133267, 116182303, 116202365, 116202672, 116203080, 116203232, 116207232, 116207715, 116230401, 116232961, 116233382, 116235073, 116235403, 116236595, 116271400, 116271460, 116272916, 116315686, 116315776, 116324803, 116327701, 116327710, 116343941, 116413443, 116414464, 116415089, 116417650, 116419746, 116421018, 116423706, 116426034, 116453954, 116489316, 116540857, 116542753, 116543747, 116546542, 116548096, 116549963, 116553894, 116571553, 116606219, 116608653, 116617540, 116619941, 116621562, 116660391, 116661709, 116663611, 116664266, 116665699, 116666832, 116668020, 116669671, 116672204, 116677003, 116764276, 116765249, 116767303, 116767783, 116768044, 116769454, 116769789, 116770612, 116771144, 116772037, 116772246, 116774303, 116775385, 116776157, 116777370, 116779540, 116780772, 116781577, 116794484, 116795327, 116801323, 116801467, 116803112, 116803132, 116805615, 116806627, 116808557, 116808795, 116811392, 116812360, 116845587, 116848539, 116849379, 116855230, 116860016, 116861486, 116861775, 116864058, 116907810, 116909943, 116910628, 116911687, 116913723, 116917799, 116918328, 116919093, 116922008, 116940708, 116941106, 116941222, 116941552, 116941744, 116942158, 116943097, 116943372, 116944123.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Glassman (2022-02-04 17:14:44+00:00): #TIP Try not to connect none related features. In this case the tennis court with the power line. I went ahead and removed the connection
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116987389
Glassman (2022-02-04 17:17:35+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion. Save and upload your edit before moving to a more distant location.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116987856
Dimacn (2022-02-04 06:19:51+00:00): 1. Не надо удалять существующие дороги, чтобы тут же на этом месте нарисовать новые. Ваш переулок Пионерский. Нужно просто редактировать существующие дороги, если они неправильные. 2. Не надо рисовать новые дороги поверх существующих, тем самым дублируя одно и тоже. Вы задвоили улицу Ленина. 3. Не надо придумывать названия дорогам и тропам, если их нет. В случае если это не улица и автодорога не имеет официального названия, поле Название (тег name) не заполняется. 4. Пожалуйста придерживайтесь соглашения об оименовании улиц в OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог   Т.е. должно быть: Торговый переулок
Glassman (2022-02-04 15:12:57+00:00): An unannounced import is against our community standards. I'm a big proponent of importing addresses but they must be discussed with the community first. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Please stop doing any more imports.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116988663
Natfoot (2022-02-08 03:16:10+00:00): Glassman is wonderful to work with on imports. Thanks for following the directions given so that we may include these changes. Please leave a comment here and Find the Slack, or Discord server in my profile for community communications.  
Kind Regards, Nat
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116988663
Robert Gash (2022-02-08 03:30:14+00:00): Aside from "didn't ask permission" objections, can anyone please cite a concern with the actual data in question?
Natfoot (2022-02-08 04:21:28+00:00): As put forth in the guidelines this is not the place to discuss the "concern with the actual data" The process that is laid out in the import guidelines is where this discussion is supposed to occur. 

MY understanding is that the "did't ask permission" is a paper trail for the licensing and understanding so that we don't have licensing or other issues from the owner of the data. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Document_your_import
It is also my understanding that guidelines are put in place so that rouge imports don't mess with existing data. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Thank You for your understanding and getting involved. Please get started with the guidelines and open a Potential Data sources here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Discuss_your_proposed_import
Glassman will likely reply tomorrow with better detail that I don't know about as this process is not something I do regularly. 

If you have further questions for me,  you can reply here, message me directly through OSM, find me on Slack or the Discord Server. 

Kind Regards, Nat
Glassman (2022-02-08 13:57:48+00:00): One of the goals of the import guidelines is to insure that the imported data is licensed appropriately to be brought into OSM. According to Jefferson County, the address points are licensed as cc by 4.0 which is incompatible with OSM's ODbL license. Ideally the data should be CC0 (public domain.) A work around is to get permission from the county for the data to be imported into OSM. That basically entails documenting email from the county on the wiki.

The actual data brought in looks great and is much needed. We just need to make sure that it meets the communities guidelines.
Allison P (2023-12-30 06:49:01+00:00): Any update on this? I'd also like to point out that the data has not been processed appropriately, with road suffixes and directionals not being spelled out
watmildon (2024-09-03 04:54:52+00:00): This data all appears to be originally licensed under CC4.0 which is, sadly, incompatible with ODbL. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

Unless Robert has gotten explicit permission from the original source, this should be reverted.
Omnific (2024-10-17 16:16:00+00:00): The data is actually licensed under ODbL, *not* CC4.0: https://gisdata-jeffcowa.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/b3654c5205da4e05b5e63f3d04b0ebc1/about. Someone also went through and expanded the street names. Seems good now.
watmildon (2024-10-17 19:40:15+00:00): Ah yes. Sorry for not following back up on this. 

User Glassman reached out and got their license updated. I did the name expansion shortly thereafter.
5m4u9 (2022-02-05 04:17:44+00:00): porqué borrar la cancha deportiva? la idea es saber qué campos deportivos hay aparte de la infraestructura que lo cubre.
mavl (2022-02-04 15:39:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет дорогу прямо поверх уже существующей дороги. Это ошибка. Если на местности одна дорога, то и на карте должна быть одна дорога. Дубликат дороги удалён.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-10 17:33:05+00:00): building=apartments ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116990362
3ngineer (2022-02-11 01:33:19+00:00): It looks like it's already fixed, thanks to that user. Ya I must've had those tags on my clipboard somehow and pasted them by accident?
literan (2022-02-05 22:13:49+00:00): на территорию вуза теперь свободный доступ для всех, включая на авто?
Gleban (2022-02-06 18:48:02+00:00): в точках входа/въезда доступ на территорию ограничен (турникеты, шлагбаум). Ставить ли на каждый объект внутри территории access - это открытый вопрос, т.к. вики однозначного ответа не нашел. А если создавать в дальнейшем навигацию внутри помещений, там тоже необходимо устанавливать access?
literan (2022-02-06 20:22:46+00:00): конечно, ставить. Ведь я со стороны не могу там свободно перемещаться

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

"Note that access tags mark legal status of territory and barriers and warning signs are only physical reflections of restrictions in area."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
"Common use is for objects with restricted access such as road where only some may drive. For example, adding access=private marks a driveway (tagged as highway=service + service=driveway) as restricted - for example because it is behind a gate. "
b-holdet (2022-03-14 20:23:41+00:00): Hvor har du denne placering fra?

Jeg kan ikke finde nogen kilder der skriver at "Museum Østjylland" ligger i Maltfabrikken.
kortgodt (2022-03-14 20:30:31+00:00): Maltfabrikkens hjemmeside. Ellers tag et besøg derinde det er både spændende og lærerigt.