piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-09-24 10:17:11+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111638385
Frans S (2021-09-24 10:14:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped.
Did you alter the offset of the imagery? most mappings are a bit offset.
 Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111638422
Frans S (2021-09-24 10:16:31+00:00): Hello. About the offset
You are mapping on the Bing Imagery.
Please change to Maxbox !!
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111638422
Frans S (2021-09-24 10:12:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111638590
archie (2021-09-24 10:11:30+00:00): Vad bra det blev!
djazzy (2021-09-24 10:35:43+00:00): Tack :)
ftcat (2021-09-26 06:00:36+00:00): Hi,

Be careful of using a shortcut such as 'Q' in JOSM to square off buildings. If the building is circular, many are in Zambia, they will end up as a straight line
Frans S (2021-09-24 10:11:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111638798
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
VictorIE (2021-09-27 17:24:17+00:00): Hi,

What does this represent?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986621470
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
vulasala (2021-09-27 04:50:28+00:00): Hi LucianIelciu,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 985508743 from service to residential, as the path giving access to multiple rooftops.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111639642
Supaplex030 (2021-09-24 12:37:28+00:00): Hallo Bufonto,
was die Angaben in der von dir angegebenen Quelle bedeuten, wurde hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108971648) in der Diskussion von StefanHRT vor zwei Monaten doch eindeutig erklärt: In den Grünanlagen sind jeweils nur EINZELNE Wege zum Radfahren freigegeben, nämlich diejenigen, die zu Beginn, am Ende oder zwischendurch eine entsprechende Beschilderung haben. Alle anderen Wege sind nicht fürs Radfahren freigegeben, da es sich um eine geschützte Grünanlage (mit dem "Tulpenschild") handelt. Deine Änderungen hier und in der Umgebung sind daher falsch und ich muss sie rückgängig machen. (Mit der Ausnahme hier, dass die West-Ost-Verbindung von "Am Rehwechsel" kommend durchgängig fürs Radfahren freigegeben ist, siehe hier: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=178860387357733)
Supaplex030 (2021-09-24 12:41:37+00:00): P.S. Das da natürlich trotzdem alle mit dem Fahrrad langfahren, ist davon völlig unabhängig.
Frans S (2021-09-24 13:51:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. You  mapped just 1 building here.  Oversized and not squared

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111639709
Frans S (2021-09-24 13:08:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
PLease map more accurate and square the buildings

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111639735
4004 (2021-09-26 23:08:19+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
в другом направлении все еще 50?
Artsiom_Bor (2021-09-27 09:44:12+00:00): Добрый день. В двух направлениях 60
4004 (2021-09-27 12:18:07+00:00): ок, поменял на том же участке
maro21 (2021-09-29 15:07:29+00:00): Żabka jest na rogu i już jest na mapie.
aceman444 (2022-03-15 21:15:20+00:00): Zdravim, prosim nedavajte na kazdy chodnik footway=sidewalk. To znamena len chodnik popri ceste, nie krizom cez park ci vnutroblok. Dakujem.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-09-25 20:44:43+00:00): Moin thetornad076,

hier hast Du aus dem Briefkasten ein Briefmarkenautomat gemacht. Zudem mit name=Deutsche Post. Kannst Du Dir das nochmal ansehen, bitte?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4007349581

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
thetornado76 (2021-09-26 17:07:37+00:00): Hallo Roger,
da habe ich mich in der Auswahl verklickt. Danke für den Hinweis. Habe es gerade korrigiert
maro21 (2021-09-29 15:08:33+00:00): Nazwy piszemy wielką literą.
Dolf Andringa (2021-11-28 07:19:37+00:00): This is absolutely wrong. This is a tiny hiking trail, not a secondary road. Please stop marking this road like that please it gives completely the wrong impression. The majority of people, except for the ones living in the sitios in the mountains even know this trail exists. It is not passable by anyone except the best trail bikes and people on foot, and going from valencia to santa agueda an Pamplona is much faster along the coast through tanjay. Please stop marking this road wrong, i keep correcting it and people who don't know the area keep messing it up
rah_em (2021-11-30 04:01:10+00:00): Hi  Dolf Andringa,

Thank you for bringing this to me about the hiking trail. But, I have modified the alignment of the highway as per the latest satellite imagery in this changeset and the classification “highway=secondary” was created by some other mapper in 2020 with multiple versions kindly refer: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/838405630 and Let us know if you have any questions.

Happy Mapping
Rahem
Bakhadir (2021-10-04 08:10:43+00:00): Кошелер атамалары переводланбайды. 
мысалы: Oq oltin ko'shesi рус тилинде "улица Белое золото" болмайды. "улица Ок олтин" болады. name:en те де солай, Oq oltin street болады
philippec (2023-09-15 19:50:11+00:00): Middelburg Helm drinkwater
Wat is dat allemaal ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.499148588544&lng=3.6105969186664&z=17&pKey=1178062606096316&focus=photo
philippec (2023-10-04 01:29:15+00:00): Ik zal in het vervolg uw fouten met hoop van juistheid  zonder overleg verbeteren.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=22/51.49918/3.61067
Pieter Vander Vennet (2023-10-05 10:46:16+00:00): Hey Filip, er waren wel degelijk twee waterkraantjes daar - jammergenoeg niet te zien op Mapillary maar wel op Google Streetview: https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4990857,3.6106079,3a,15y,194.86h,84.08t/data=!3m11!1e1!3m9!1sAF1QipPWcZtN1MujrgA7F1JWR-LBb7riWmqpxccd5zZ7!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipPWcZtN1MujrgA7F1JWR-LBb7riWmqpxccd5zZ7%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya174.80296-ro-0-fo100!7i4608!8i2304!9m2!1b1!2i49?hl=en&entry=ttu
Ltrlg (2021-09-24 11:12:01+00:00): Étrange, ce imagery_used=Cadastre, c’était la BDOrtho. Pas que ça change grand chose, vu que je ne l’ai pas utilisé, mais étrange.
maro21 (2021-09-29 15:10:01+00:00): The shoe shop is already on the map. This shop is vacant.
Pikse (2021-10-03 12:06:18+00:00): Tee ja oja, mis ristuvad eri tasanditel, ei peaks olema punktiga ühendatud, vt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer.

Näiteks neil joontel ei peaks olema ühist sõlme: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855506729
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47094859
Frans S (2021-09-24 13:31:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate mapping . your mappings are far oversizen. Squaring the buildings

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111642641
Frans S (2021-09-24 13:10:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
most buildings are rectangular. Please square them
Yards, (light spaces without shadow) don't need to be mapped as a building

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111642666
Frans S (2021-09-24 15:27:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the buildings
Be more accurate

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111643252
Frans S (2021-09-24 15:24:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square all buildings
Be more accurate
Do not connect buildings with their nodes

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111643293
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 10:55:44+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on Bing aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
maro21 (2021-09-29 15:13:35+00:00): Please limit your edits to one country. One changeset = one country.
BCNorwich (2021-09-24 13:51:11+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the tags addr:housename=328 and name=328 Hawthorn Drive as they don't conform to OSM tagging practice. Neither tag is a house name.

Regards Bernard.
Ser9ei (2021-09-25 21:50:36+00:00): Не надо назначать hw значения bicycle=yes
horse=yes. Это подразумевается по умолчанию без лишних тегов. Следует назначать только запрещающие тэги. Если по дороге нельзя проехать на велосипеде или лошади, то теги bicycle=no horse=no имеют смысл. В противном случае они просто увеличивают объём базы, не добавляя смысла.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111645179
Frans S (2021-09-24 15:29:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
nearly all buildings are rectangular. Please square all buildings as well.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111645454
rskedgell (2021-09-24 19:46:52+00:00): Presumably these four shops have closed permanently, is the building being redeveloped?
Владимир К (2022-02-07 08:54:12+00:00): Добрый день!
внести не получилось, не на том объекте указано. работать нигде не будет
Владимир К (2022-02-07 09:36:31+00:00): поворот налево при проезде откуда куда?
Павел552 (2022-02-07 09:43:05+00:00): Запрещен поворот при движении по ул 60 лет ВЛКСМ в сторону ул Чапаева. На перекрестке 60 лет ВЛКСМ - 9 мая поворот налево запрещен.
Владимир К (2022-02-07 11:48:02+00:00): отметил
Otenkiya (2021-10-02 02:10:08+00:00): 報告
ウェイ: 国道22号 (50827347)の分断により、リレーション: 国道22号 (2191283)に分断が発生、修正済み（リレーションに変更がなくとも、ウェイを分断した場合は、ルートが途切れることがありますので注意願います）。
skyper (2021-10-11 11:09:34+00:00): Hello Viki_travel_weak

You did not remove the relation nor fix it.
Please, always take a look at the history of the objects. These relation were broken in CS 77471652 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77471652) and never restored.
Simply deleting is the wrong action as these relations need to be fixed.

Please, take a look at all the relations you changed the last month and fix them, thanks.

Would be nice if you inform me after your are done and, please, tell your team about the problem. Thanks a lot.

Regards skyper
skyper (2021-10-11 11:11:30+00:00): #REVIEWED_BAD
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-21 09:43:26+00:00): hi skyper! this is a well-known issue for us, so we stopped mapping restrictions until we figure out this technical problem. thanks for mention! best regards.
wireguy (2021-09-24 15:38:59+00:00): Hi Juliamichael8, welcome to OSM!   Pools usually don't have names, or personal information, so I removed it.   I also shaped it a bit and added a few houses.   Keep mapping!
skyper (2021-10-11 11:12:33+00:00): #REVIEWED_BAD

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111646166
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-21 09:52:12+00:00): Hello skyper,
I answered in other comments, duplicate information:
Enough time has passed since these edits, and I am sure that our work process will fix everything that we have broken over time. Thanks your mention. 
Thanks viki_travel_weak
skyper (2021-10-11 11:15:03+00:00): #REVIEWED_BAD

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111646166
skyper (2021-10-13 12:49:45+00:00): Hi Viki
Sorry, I was wrong in this case.
This was never a valid turn restriction.
Take care
skyper
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-21 09:54:14+00:00): Hello skyper
Yes you are right! thank you very much for your support!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
wireguy (2021-09-24 13:10:01+00:00): Hi Jbb, welcome to OSM.  Thanks for adding a house.   I made some corrections, take a look.   The outline of the house should be the footprint of the building, not the whole property. Houses don't usually have names, so use the addr:street and addr:housenumber fields for information.   There's more information in the wiki.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
abakus_uploader (2021-09-24 22:33:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
WoodWoseWulf (2021-09-25 20:27:52+00:00): Hi Jbb5775,

OSM typically works on the idea of "one feature, one OSM element."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

As this school is already on the map as an area, it doesn't need to also be added as a point. 

I have moved the grade information you added onto the older, existing area and have removed the point.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Futur3r (2021-09-24 14:08:10+00:00): Bonjour,

c'est une voie ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111647369
Futur3r (2021-09-24 14:08:36+00:00): Vous auriez de la documentation dessus pour confirmer ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111647369
Michal Jantar (2021-09-24 15:29:11+00:00): https://www.camptocamp.org/routes/57988/en/falaise-de-la-colombiere-fanfoue-des-pnottas that's the route. But map on camptocamp is not exact (looks like there are coordinates of end of the route, not beginning). 

After we finished route we were passing around start of the route and i saved gps coordinates.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.