piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-01-12 17:21:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Tomas Straupis (2017-01-13 07:49:14+00:00): Atšaukti neteisingi pėsčiųjų, dviračių ir automobilių kelių perklasifikavimai.
Commodoortje (2017-01-13 11:37:52+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-13 11:41:10+00:00): Is er een reden dat de perziklaan acces=no heeft meegekregen? Of is dit per ongeluk gegaan. 
Als je wat hulp wil laat het gerust even weten.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465406500
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ztaoqk21j2yc4dh/2017-01-13_12-39-22.png?raw=1
Zwelgje (2017-01-13 13:45:37+00:00): Bedankt voor je reactie. Ik heb het aangepast en meteen weer wat geleerd.
Fijn weekend!
mavl (2017-10-14 15:29:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52924532 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45077372].
mavl (2017-10-14 15:29:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52924532 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45077372].
EdLoach (2017-01-12 17:15:10+00:00): Hi Chris, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm going to change Green Lane back to a track, which is what it is physically. It also has the designation=public_footpath tag on it to mark that it is a public footpath - I'm not sure how clear that is in iD editor that you used. Any questions let me know. Best wishes. Ed
mavl (2017-10-14 15:29:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52924532 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45077372].
BCNorwich (2017-01-12 18:15:38+00:00): Hello there, your mapping of the three fields  is very imprecise as to be almost valueless. Could you please make good these areas, you can zoom right in so as to very accurately map field boundary's.
Commodoortje (2017-01-13 08:56:52+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-13 09:01:09+00:00): Ik zag dat je een stukje hebt toegevoegd zonder de daarbijbehorende eigenschappen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465411065
Ik heb het voor je aangepast. Je zou hier kunnen lezen welke eigenschappen je aan een weg kunt geven.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen#Wegen
Probeer je beginnende edits klein te houden, en vraag evt om hulp op het forum als je het niet meer weet.
mavl (2017-10-14 15:29:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52924532 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45077372].
Rom1 (2017-01-14 20:48:41+00:00): Bonjour, c'est bien d'avoir corrigé ton erreur de tag source mais il faudrait également prévoir de restaurer le tag source initial.
mides (2017-01-14 22:22:42+00:00): Bonsoir, pas de souci on y travaille. Une erreur a été faite il faut assumer maintenant. Par contre, cela risque de prendre un peu de temps et l'on garde espoir que vous fassiez preuve d'un peu de compréhension. Et pour  terminer, je n'ai pas le souvenir que l'on ait gardé les cochons ensemble pour que vous vous autorisiez à me tutoyer. Les valeurs se perdent ! Bien à vous,
mides (2017-01-15 09:12:42+00:00): Bonjour, 
normalement tout est rentré dans l'ordre et nous restons bien évidement à votre disposition si vous étiez amené à constater une erreur non corrigée de notre part. 
Cdt,
Rom1 (2017-01-16 09:58:21+00:00): Je m'adresse à tous les contributeurs de la même façon donc il ne faut pas s'offusquer outre mesure. On est tous à égalité dans OSM. Quoiqu'il en soit, merci pour les corrections.
mides (2017-01-16 16:08:09+00:00): Ma
Cybereric (2018-06-28 17:39:08+00:00): Bonjour, 
Ce point est cartographié "place=neighbourhood". Il désigne donc bien un quartier celui de l' "Île Mabon" (du nom de l'ancienne île).
Il ne s'agit pas du tout du "Square de l'Île Mabon" qui est représenté lui par le polygone >>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104559390
Le renommage était donc inutile.
Alecs01 (2017-01-13 16:55:00+00:00): Grazie e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, ho aggiunto amenity=theatre che il tag che descrive i teatri, e i contatti indicati sul sito http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtheatre
mavl (2017-10-14 15:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52924532 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45077372].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Patrick Etomet (2017-01-13 19:28:12+00:00): These are some of the errors that new mappers keep uploading to the map that we need to keep track!
If you know of someone new please don't forget to get close to them so as to minimize such errors......
I think I have a lot of work here!!!
mueschel (2017-01-13 12:10:15+00:00): Hi,
could you check the spelling of tags? I found 73 ways with the tag "intermitant" which should be "intermittent".

Cheers, Jan
maraf24 (2017-01-13 10:04:51+00:00): Numer uchwały powinien być w source:name lub w komentarzu do zestawu zmian, a stara nazwa w old_name.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
eggie (2017-01-19 20:59:17+00:00): Wim hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.53603/4.75655
kruist een footway een path zonder verbindingsnode. Even ter lering ende vermaak. Verbeter jij? Wanneer er geen blauw rond bord staat moet het trouwens highway=path zijn.. geen footway. groet, Egbert

http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?zoom=19&lat=51.53617&lon=4.75681&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
fietswim (2017-01-19 22:41:32+00:00): Klopt, heb ik gewijzigd.
BCNorwich (2017-01-19 19:10:40+00:00): removed fiction
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:35:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-14 15:29:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52924532 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45077372].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:27:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:26:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-14 15:29:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52924532 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45077372].
lcat (2017-01-12 15:40:41+00:00): Привет. Да, это есть административная граница поселений по их генпланам. А admin_level=10 это что? По вики даже что-то ниже городского района
fserges (2017-01-12 15:47:30+00:00): Наверное мы как-то неправильно поняли друг друга. Внутри поселения (admin_level=8) могут находиться населённые пункты (у нас обычно их мапят как admin_level=10). "Крутые Выселки" (НП) находятся в составе "Комсомольского СС", поэтому физически не могут быть admin_level=8 (объекты одного admin_level не могут иметь общих внутренних точек). Я предположил что на карте отмечена граница НП (по генплану) и понизил до разумного значения (т.е. admin_level=8). Если это не граница НП, то тогда что это за граница? Спасибо!
lcat (2017-01-12 16:38:18+00:00): Да, действительно, не обратил внимания, что сельсоветы уже 8 уровень. Тогда не имею никаких претензий)
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:01:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:25:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:25:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:25:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:25:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
RSergei (2017-01-12 18:58:05+00:00): Весело тебе пришлось... Такое творчество откатывать..
mavl (2017-01-12 19:05:30+00:00): Так это ж не я откатывал. Это всё скрипт Фредерика, который работал часа полтора, а ещё перед откатом полчаса скачивал пакеты правок. Весело будет участнику читать более 2000 электронных писем с уведомлением о комментарии к пакетам правок.
diskmanti (2018-01-22 14:53:00+00:00): pershendetje. tag e perdorura nga ju nuk jane te plota. Cfare lloj biznesi eshte kjo pike
user_5359 (2017-01-12 21:03:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Really residential highways with maxspeed 120 mph (193 km/h) ?? Please give a source of this value!!
diskmanti (2018-09-19 06:42:37+00:00): cfare lloj amenity eshte? ke shenuar vetem emrin
MrYadro (2017-01-12 17:19:58+00:00): Hello RussianMaus are you aware that Automated edits should be discussed and approved. And source of you automated edit has to allow commercial use of that data.
RussianMaus (2017-01-12 17:59:54+00:00): What exactly your plaint is about?
I used JOSM with autogenerate plugin to map some lakes. Only issue i see there that there is a lot of nodes.
greengo (2019-03-03 20:44:42+00:00): Which church is located in this amphitheater? It appears to be a public space not affiliated with any religious organization. There are no churches listed as being on the Seattle Center grounds according to http://seattlecenter.com
eggie (2017-11-28 20:45:05+00:00): Tip: Je hebt hier van een tertiary weg een residential gemaakt. Een andere mapper heeft het later weer verbeterd. De binnenstraten zijn residential. De doorgaande wegen meestal niet. Probeer in je edit te laten zien wat je hebt gedaan.
GinaroZ (2017-01-12 19:20:17+00:00): Hi, just to let you know that gates need to actually be part of a road or path for them to work properly. 
If you move the gate node slightly it should highlight a node on the road, allowing you to drop it onto that node.
munkiepus (2017-01-13 10:53:25+00:00): cool thanks, i have move the gates onto the road properly, cheers
h264x (2017-07-25 10:00:25+00:00): Why did you decide to remove address and house number in this "fix"?
Snusmumriken (2017-07-26 06:57:16+00:00): The address of Svartmangatan 9 was already mapped since before and we don't want duplicates. I also added a relation that associates Knackeriet to that address.
h264x (2017-07-26 11:45:27+00:00): Good point! Thanks for responding.
Mike Baggaley (2017-01-14 18:45:11+00:00): Hi Andy, U10633 does not seem like a valid name for way 107127842. Were you intending it to be the ref?

Cheers,
Mike
Mike Baggaley (2017-01-14 18:47:44+00:00): I also notice ways 138609531, 144783725 and 144783731 have similar errors (U4047 and U3071).

Mike
andyfrizzle (2017-01-14 23:31:14+00:00): Mike, These are unclassified county roads in Northumberland that I am adding to OSM.
The U1063 is the road number as classified by Northumberland County Council. The road numbers can be checked against the Northumberland Adopted Highways Map at http://map.northumberland.gov.uk/adoptedHighways/

Andy Frizzle
Mike Baggaley (2017-01-14 23:43:10+00:00): Hi Andy, no problem with the numbers, but they need to go in the ref field, not the name field. I think there are 7 instances of your changes putting them in the name field - the 4 previously mentioned plus ways 202029240, 465437434 and 465437953.

You can view them at URLs of the form http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107127842

Cheers,
Mike
andyfrizzle (2017-01-14 23:58:11+00:00): Mike,
I will amend the records, but I cannot see where to enter the 'ref=U1063' data when editing the map. Let me know how to do this and I will amend the records.
Andy
andyfrizzle (2017-01-15 00:23:59+00:00): Mike,
I now understand how to input the ref field.
I will amend the other records.
Thanks for the input and assistance.
Andy.
GinaroZ (2017-01-12 19:26:16+00:00): Is this path actually a cycle path, i.e. a designated shared use path or is it just a pavement?
munkiepus (2017-01-13 10:52:45+00:00): it is designated shared use cycle path
munkiepus (2017-01-13 10:55:56+00:00): annoyingly it doesn't extend all the way to the end of Russell road and abruptly stops where i have ended it, cyclists have to then use the road, It's a double width pavement with a median marker, it's designated mixed use. The council is currently discussign plans to exend it
GinaroZ (2017-01-13 12:57:23+00:00): Ok. What you will need to do though is connect it to the roads. At the north end, just extend the path at right angles. And where it crosses Roseburn Maltings, double click on the path so it creates a node, then move that node to join onto Roseburn Maltings.

With the tags, you need to remove access=no, and horse=no isn't really neccessary. I think cycleways are assumed to be bicycle=designated (and possibly foot=yes/designated) but you can add those if you want.
segregated=yes (if it has a line down the middle)
smoothness and width are also useful tags
munkiepus (2017-01-13 13:53:07+00:00): cool i have updated as you suggested, i dont have the width measurement just now but can go out and get it soon
Marych_ (2017-01-13 06:03:50+00:00): Уважаемый springtrapony 
Вы присвоили дороге
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239837945#map=17/41.37620/69.30243
статус residental
Она реально предназначена для сквозного проезда через квартал(навигаторы поведут через нее)?
Если только для подезда к домам, то нужно понизить статус до
living_street
или
service
springtrapony (2017-01-13 18:19:51+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/18086349 <- первая версия дороги, как и последующие (ваша правка также присутствует), содержат тег residential
Ее лично не видела (в правки входило лишь присоединение дорог service)
Marych_ (2017-01-14 04:43:13+00:00): Вопрос вы местный, эта дорога что из себя представляет?
pyram (2017-01-12 21:29:40+00:00): Hallo ElliottPlack,
excuse me for asking, but I think this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6875247#map=14/38.4456/-75.9702) is never a giant camp site. It seems to be a wetland. Maybe a Copy/Paste-Error?
ElliottPlack (2017-01-12 21:33:11+00:00): Hey Pyram, it is covered by a lot of wetlands, but the land is owned by a massive christian youth camping organization: https://tudorfarms.younglife.org/Pages/default.aspx
ElliottPlack (2017-01-12 21:33:35+00:00): I only learned of it when trying to figure out what those crazy triangles are for
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:24:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:24:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:25:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
FahRadler (2017-09-06 18:00:37+00:00): thats no roundabout!!!
-> a kind of turning loop
Verdy_p (2017-09-06 18:52:55+00:00): where, I've looked at all of them individually, may be there's some invisible signs that could say the opposite
Verdy_p (2017-09-06 18:53:35+00:00): Exceptions to this is extremely rare in France.
FahRadler (2017-09-09 09:30:37+00:00): i´ve been there, that a turning loop
Verdy_p (2017-09-09 10:04:30+00:00): such comment in not useful if you don't specify "where"
SomeoneElse (2018-03-15 00:12:59+00:00): @Verdy_p is this another mechanical edit?  Maybe if your change was in a smaller geographical area and not a whole country you wouldn't have to ask "where" when someone asks about the validity of an object in it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:25:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)