piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Calistemon (2023-01-05 11:12:32+00:00): Manypeaks is defined as a "Localities (LGATE-234)" by Landgate, an agency of the Western Australian Government, which is what the Wikidata item is for (see https://nationalmap.gov.au/). This also aligns with the 2021 Australian Census (see https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/SAL50895) for the Manypeaks entry. The census ID for Manypeaks is SAL50895, which is one of the identifiers on the Wikidata item. The localities (being suburbs, towns or just actual localities, depending on LGA) are the sub-level to the Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Western Australia. Manypeaks is a sublevel of the City of Albany, one of 61 of those within this city (see https://www.albany.wa.gov.au/facilities/about-albany/moving-to-albany.aspx). The locality of Manypeaks covers 295.5 square kilometre. The Relation shows the boundary of this locality, the Node does not. If you go into There is a process ongoing of linking all these locality Relations with their relevant Wikidata on OSM to allow for the map showing the boundaries to be displayed at the relevant Wikipedia articles for all localities in Western Australia. Removing the Wikidata items from the Relation randomly undoes this process!
Frans S (2023-01-27 18:01:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. I have a remark about mapping a 'landuse=residential area."
It is common use to map and tag these areas when there are at least 4 buildings close together. Single buildings can be tagged with a single node tagged as place=isoleted_dwelling.
Best regards
BharatRV5avB6N (2022-12-12 10:44:01+00:00): This changeset should be counted in India as the location of bbox center is inside the country of India

I have not made any single change of elements in Pakistan yet as of time of December 12, 2022. 

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=13422783#5/28.902/82.859
tastrax (2022-12-13 00:04:58+00:00): Did you really mean access=no on Platform Peak track? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno
Dodko (2022-12-12 16:00:08+00:00): Namiesto
shop=supermarket
použite
shop=convenience

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dconvenience
NorthCrab (2022-12-11 08:43:55+00:00): Ten odcinek https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120949222/history bardziej wygląda na path niż footway. Można rozważyć zmianę kategorii.
NorthCrab (2022-12-11 08:44:53+00:00): Ten odcinek nie wygląda na track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946464086/history Service pasowało tutaj lepiej uważam.
:-} (2022-12-11 11:45:14+00:00): Znaczy,wcześniej poprawiałem ale ktoś zmienił.Postaram się zmienić
ivanbranco (2022-12-16 10:09:22+00:00): Ciao Canfe,

hai aggiunto lo stesso ref:msal a due farmacie: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1p8i

Le coordinate del dataset msal sembrerebbero indicare che quella corretta è questa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10252749842

l'indirizzo però è: Via Antica Dogana, 2/I in Frazione Quarto D'Asti
strada che però non mi risulta sia mappata in OSM. 

Tu hai qualche informazione in piu'?
ivanbranco (2022-12-16 10:12:08+00:00): https://www.facebook.com/farmaciadelpopolo.asti/

la loro pagina Facebook invece indica come indirizzo "via antica dogana frazione quarto inferiore, Asti, Italy", che sembrerebbe indicare l'altra farmacia come corretta, in quanto mappata vicino al nodo hamlet "Quarto Inferiore".
canfe (2022-12-18 09:11:18+00:00): E che c'erano un po' di farmacie tutte con le coordinate uguali in piazza Alfieri.
Ci son dovuto andare e ho sistemato un po'. Avevo dimenticato di cancellare quella in piazza Alfieri.
La farmacia è effettivamente  a Quarto. La via non c'è ma c'è lì vicino l'albergo Antica Dogana, pertanto...
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-11 08:17:18+00:00): proszę, odpowiedz na komentarze w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129944014
:-} (2022-12-11 11:48:20+00:00): Już jest
marczoutendijk (2022-12-13 18:45:51+00:00): Please read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
I have fixed your edits.
building=yes is all you need.
name=building is wrong
hanskuster (2022-12-11 08:43:57+00:00): Hallo,
sie haben den Radweg am Zollamt fälschlicherweise gelöscht.
Die Luftaufnahmen in dem Bereich sind veraltet.
Bitte um einen Revert.
vmicho (2022-12-11 18:39:22+00:00): Serwus. Welche genau?
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=129954729

Ich fahre durch Diepoldsau am Samstag wieder, ich kann ganze sache filmen un nacharbeiten.

LG, Michal
hanskuster (2022-12-11 20:10:34+00:00): Hallo Michal,
ich bin heute abend da vorbei gefahren und habe den gelöschten Weg nochmals aufgezeichnet. Ich habe ihn jetzt wieder eingetragen und noch weitere Details ergänzt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120953497#map=19/47.37778/9.66929
Du musst also nicht nochmals dort vorbeifahren, aber darfst es trotzdem, wenn du willst ;-)

Gruss, hanskuster
vmicho (2022-12-11 20:19:55+00:00): Aaaaah diese. Schaut aus wie es is nicht mehr dort.
Aber basemap.at ist trotzdem neuer dann ;)
silversurfer83 (2022-12-11 13:48:23+00:00): Hallo Werner,

kleiner Hinweis zu den Kontaktdaten:
Bei OpenStreetMap haben wir aktuell das Problem, dass die Menschen, die sich um den Editor, den du nutzt, kümmern (der heißt iD), nicht alle zu einem Objekt eingetragenen Daten auch immer gut sichtbar anzeigen.
So war bei Ver.Di schon eine Telefonnummer hinterlegt. Jedoch mit dem etwas neueren contact:-Schema. Das sah dann so aus
contact:phone=+4924788592
Dies siehst du aber nur, wenn du in der linken Spalte weiter nach unten schaust, im Bereich "Eigenschaften". Dort wird dir alles angezeigt, was zu dem von dir angewählten Objekt abgespeichert ist. Wenn dort schon Daten mit contact: abgelegt sind, brauchst du sie nicht noch zusätzlich bei iD einzutragen (zb. mit phone=932874583). Das wäre dann doppelt.
Die allermeisten Datennutzer kennen das System und erkennen die Telefonnummer, Webseite, ... trotzdem.


UND WEITERHIN BITTE ICH UM EINE REAKTION VON DIR. DANKE
Kovoschiz (2022-12-11 09:09:24+00:00): Please check guidelines and the status quo. Only Tunnel Area will be `=motorway`
Kovoschiz (2022-12-11 09:10:17+00:00): 2. Descriptive changeset comments please. This is not "minor".
willkmis (2022-12-12 02:12:13+00:00): Hi OrdinaryJosh,
As you might've seen from the history of these ways, this road has been the subject of some back-and-forth between trunk and motorway. It's been discussed in changeset comments (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117138915) and Slack discussions (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCN1KJ76U/p1641935550007600) within the past year. This segment that you changed is highly sub-standard for a freeway, with a speed limit of only 45 mph and tight curves. In addition, there are prominent Begin Freeway (EB, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9523487420) and End Freeway (WB) signs near the 4th St overpass, and the consensus among local California mappers is to have the beginnings and endings of highway=motorway segments correspond to the locations of these signs (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/Map_features). In light of these two on-the-ground facts, previous consensus has been to map this segment as highway=trunk + expressway=yes: despite whatever "official" freeway title it may hold, the actual road doesn't really fit the physical definition of highway=motorway. In light of that, I urge you to please consider reverting this change.
Best,
Will
tastrax (2023-02-03 05:28:26+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
olo81 (2023-05-10 01:48:21+00:00): nazwa opisowa, pytania w fixme
wywalone
geozeisig (2022-12-12 07:31:55+00:00): Hallo
du das eine Datensatz revidiert, bei dem ich einen Fehler korrigiert habe.
Es muss nicht fortification_type=fortification
sondern
archaeological_site=fortification

Das sollte korrigiert werden

Gruß Dieter
PT-53 (2022-12-12 08:03:57+00:00): Siehe hierzu die Diskussion im OSM-Forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/massenedit-von-site-type-zu-archaeological-site-diskutiert-und-abgesprochen/6577
chris66 (2022-12-12 10:52:45+00:00): @geozeisig Danke für den Hinweis, werde ich versuchen zu korrigieren.
geozeisig (2022-12-12 14:00:53+00:00): Auch dem neuen Forum fehlt es leider an Netiquette. Das ist nicht jedermanns Sache.
Ich empfehle die Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:fortification_type%3Dringfort
zur Hilfe zu nehmen.
chris66 (2022-12-12 16:35:48+00:00): Verstehe leider nicht was Du meinst.
geozeisig (2022-12-13 08:48:37+00:00): Kann man das nicht auf den Stand vor meiner ersten Änderung zurücksetzen?

also den Änderungssatz #129924698
chris66 (2022-12-13 11:37:47+00:00): Es sollte durch meinen ChangeSet
#129996263
nun alles wieder auf dem alten Stand (mit site_type=fortification) sein.
geozeisig (2022-12-13 15:19:35+00:00): Danke, ich werde das Thema erst mal in Ruhe lassen.
timmito (2022-12-13 04:47:14+00:00): Hallo osm-pt-account, warum hast du von junction=circular auf junction=roundabout geändert? Es ist kein Kreisverkehr-Schild vorhanden, der Verkehr innerhalb des Kreises hat nicht immer Vorrang, die U-Bahn hat Vorrang (Andreaskreuz). Meines Erachtens passt daher junction=circular. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Possible_misinterpretations Zur Situation vor Ort siehe beispielsweise: https://main-riedberg.de/unfall-zwischen-u9-und-lkw-am-riedbergkreisel/
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-12-13 22:57:45+00:00): Junction=circular denotes a circular lane that runs anti-clockwise.
timmito (2022-12-13 23:20:17+00:00): The circular lane runs anti-clockwise, but the traffic does not have always right of way. So it is junction=circular, no junction=roundabout.
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-12-15 17:02:33+00:00): Not always giving way on thw circular lane means junction=circular?
timmito (2022-12-15 17:36:05+00:00): Not alway right of way means junction=circular.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Possible_misinterpretations

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-12-18 12:01:05+00:00): Vehicles in the roundabout definitely have the right of way.
timmito (2022-12-18 13:03:12+00:00): No, the subway has right of way. There are saltire crosses with a stop line and signal system. That's why there's no rundabout sign.
osm-pt-account 😎 (2022-12-23 00:09:09+00:00): The route of the subway is regulated by a signaling system and therefore has nothing to do with right of way. Only the vehicles in the circle are relevant and they have the right of way.
timmito (2022-12-31 11:07:00+00:00): A subway is also a vehicle.

I startet a discussion in the german community: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kreisformige-fahrbahn-bei-der-u-bahn-vorrang-hat-roundabout-oder-circular/7425
eggie (2022-12-11 14:46:08+00:00): Dag Björn.. Volgens mij gaat het nu goed.
MVG
eggie
Kovoschiz (2022-12-11 13:58:54+00:00): Please refer to Tuen Mun -- Chek Lap Kok Tunnel. While Route 10 and main line with Tuen Mun Bypass is not opened yet, it is still a `=motorway` until the roundabout. (For it, even then there is an argument  to remain due to the Tunnel Road being a fork connecting with the roundabout)
Branko Kokanovic (2022-12-11 11:05:11+00:00): 👌
eggie (2022-12-11 11:03:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan.
Schuiven met de kaart kan schade geven. Je hebt Fluwijnstraat 32 ergens anders heen gesleept. 

Let op als je ergens mee gaat slepen dat de rest onbedoeld ook meekomt.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129956718

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-11 11:11:43+00:00): De wandelpaden svp niet aan de landuse vastplakken.. De adresnode heb ik hersteld
JurjenL (2022-12-11 12:12:08+00:00): Fluwijnstraat 32 inderdaad niet opgemerkt. Bedankt voor het corrigeren.
eggie (2022-12-11 12:37:05+00:00): No problem.
Het komt omdat je selecteert met de linkermuisknop ..maar ook schuift.
Veel plezier met mappen..
Eggie
blacx (2022-12-11 23:11:25+00:00): Es pot saber que fas?
eggie (2022-12-11 11:06:41+00:00): Jurjen .. Wanneer je er mag fietsen zal het geen footway zijn maar waarschijnlijk een highway=path. .. of er moet een bord staan fietsen toegestaan. 

MVG
eggie
JurjenL (2022-12-11 12:11:27+00:00): Hi, ik denk dat het officieel een voetpad is maar het wordt door gebruikt om ook doorheen te fietsen (en er staat geen epliciet bord wat het voetpad en/of fietspad maakt).
eggie (2022-12-11 12:38:35+00:00): Oke.. geen bord dan highway=path.. blijft lastig soms.
Gr eggie
jpennycook (2022-12-11 14:19:52+00:00): Hi.
The golf course was replaced with a country park several years ago:-
"The second phase, which includes the former golf club car park at Ively Road, opened in December 2019 and offers access to a further 27 hectares of natural land opened up on the eastern side of the country park." (https://www.rushmoor.gov.uk/southwoodcountrypark)

Jon
RpalmerAC (2022-12-12 13:26:15+00:00): Thank you!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-07 03:36:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085432685

surface=cailloux - have you wanted to mark https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpebblestone or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dgravel ?

Or some other standard surface value? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface (there is also page in French at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:surface )
Calistemon (2023-01-05 02:51:09+00:00): I'm not sure why the Wikidata item for the locality of Frankland River, Q5491115, was disabled in this edit. Looking at my sources (https://nationalmap.gov.au and https://maps.slip.wa.gov.au/landgate/locate/), the relation on OSM is the very same one as on Wikidata, the boundaries match on the maps. The connection between them seems valid. They are still linked as such on Wikidata but the unlinking on OSM now has “broken” the map on the English Wikipedia. I have relinked it.
TheSwavu (2023-01-05 03:09:27+00:00): This is the same problem. Q5491115 is the town. The relation is the bounded locality. I had already moved the wikidata item to the place node.
Calistemon (2023-01-05 11:32:35+00:00): Frankland River is defined as a "Localities (LGATE-234)" by Landgate, an agency of the Western Australian Government, which is what the Wikidata item is for (see https://nationalmap.gov.au/). This also aligns with the 2021 Australian Census (see https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/SAL50520) for the Frankland River entry. The census ID for Frankland River is SAL50520, which is one of the identifiers on the Wikidata item. The localities (being suburbs, towns or just actual localities, depending on LGA) are the sub-level to the Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Western Australia. Frankland River is a sublevel of the Shire of Cranbrook. The locality of Frankland River covers 1,391.9 square kilometre. The Relation shows the boundary of this locality, the Node does not. There is a process ongoing of linking all these locality Relations with their relevant Wikidata on OSM to allow for the map showing the boundaries to be displayed at the relevant Wikipedia articles for all localities in Western Australia.
eggie (2022-12-11 11:08:17+00:00): Geef concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. 
Dus toegangsweg aangepast naar wandelpad. 
MVG
eggie
VictorIE (2022-12-12 09:48:20+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3641671655

How come you have moved the buffers stops at Connolly Luas?

In general,  it isn't the done thing to have a single changeset that covers such a large area. Can I check what you have deleted?
VictorIE (2022-12-12 13:07:27+00:00): The shape of the Irish Rail Head Office in now incorrect.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254369231
oliver mr (2022-12-22 08:17:05+00:00): Hi Victor, apologies I'm a new user. I tried to revert with http://revert.osmz.ru/7984 but got an error.  Do you know another way to revert?
VictorIE (2022-12-22 08:37:27+00:00): I can ask someone to look at it. I think JOSM has the option.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-12-27 00:09:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130535199 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changeset following request at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129958453
SomeoneElse (2022-12-27 00:13:37+00:00): Hello,
The only two things that didn't revert cleanly were https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363539869/history which has been subsequently edits and since deleted, and the Luas Red Line relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3616737 , also since edited.
Is everything OK now?
Best Regards,
Andy
VictorIE (2022-12-27 07:51:46+00:00): Thanks. I've fixed the footway. The Luas relation can be fixed.
eggie (2022-12-11 14:37:01+00:00): Hoi tr

Lijkt me oke... Op het hek zou je ook nog access=private kunnen bijtaggen.

MVG
eggie
skquinn (2023-08-09 20:11:15+00:00): Hi,

Please do not use name=* for entering full addresses. The appropriate key is addr:full=*. Thanks!
limes11 (2023-05-09 22:19:21+00:00): Hi, 

du hast hier ein Restaurant mit "disused:shop=yes" ersetzt. Das ist schonmal sehr ungewöhnlich. Zudem hast das Hotel dutzende aktuelle Bewertungen. 

Sicher, dass es nicht mehr existiert?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9197870016/history

VG Limes
Grinbert 🙂 (2023-05-10 05:59:37+00:00): Als ich damals vorbeiging, wirkte es schon recht geschlossen. Aber vielleicht hatte ich mich auch von der Erscheinung täuschen lassen.
Nithinat S (2022-12-17 04:16:37+00:00): Hi BeckNoDa, as per the current wiki guidelines, I have reverted your major road classification upgrade. Feel free to reach out to the community if you have any questions or would like to participate in improving guidelines: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/th/53
BeckNoDa (2022-12-25 06:42:51+00:00): Hello, Currently, route 340 is a trunk road. So, route 347 in the section before the interchange in Bang Pahan can be trunk road and it also meets the condition that define in the guideline.
Nithinat S (2022-12-25 08:30:11+00:00): The 347 section from Pathum Thani to Bang Pahan is about 50 km long, so it doesn't meet the guidelines. The 340 can be trunk because it is longer than 100 km.
dcapillae (2022-12-11 14:07:37+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido. Es la tercera vez que añade el mismo restaurante (véanse conjunto de cambios 129946057, 129946263 y el actual).

Por favor, no añada objetos duplicados. Imagino que no es intencionado. Si se trata de algún malfuncionamiento de su aplicación, por favor, trate de solucionarlo.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
Leo Slager (2022-12-12 11:09:25+00:00): Beste Seat Ibiza,
Met de editor iD gaat dat helaas altijd fout. De nieuwe wegen en bushaltes worden dan achter aan in de relatie geplakt. Die wegen en haltes staan dan niet in de juiste volgorde en leiden tot foutmeldingen.
Als je serieus met routerelaties aan de slag wilt gaan, dan adviseer ik je dringend om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM.
Zie ook:https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
De routerelaties zijn weer gerepareerd.
Vonter (2022-12-11 12:00:52+00:00): Hello. I noticed that you have added a new node for the Krishnarajapuram station. There was already a way with the same tags (along with a few additional tags) mapped, so I think this extra/duplicate station is not needed and can be deleted. For reference, this is the original way object I'm referring to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104358047
Heinz_V (2022-12-11 15:48:15+00:00): The origional way, that you mention, is the station building, It should be tagged with building=train_station. All other railway station in India are mapped with a single node and that makes sense also in this case.
Heinz_V (2022-12-11 15:50:08+00:00): The ref-tag and the railway=station is not meant for the building and should be deleted.
skyper (2022-12-13 15:20:11+00:00): Hi ChillyDL,
hier hattest Du die Rolle "outer" gelöscht, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1839697.
Der JOSM-Validator hat mich gewarnt und ich habe es repariert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130040188
Grüße,
skyper
ChillyDL (2022-12-13 19:24:40+00:00): Oh, Mist - und danke fürs Aufpassen und Reparieren!

Hast du eine Ahnung, wie das passiert sein könnte? Ich hatte in JOSM gearbeitet und kann mich nicht erinnern, bewusst eine Rolle "outer" gelöscht zu haben ...
skyper (2022-12-14 12:41:44+00:00): Nee, keine Ahnung wie das passieren konnte. Kenne allerdings auch nicht Deine Arbeitsweise. Mir ist kein Bug bekannt und JOSM ändert keine Rollen automatisch. Eventuell im Relations-Editor unten auf den Knopf für die Rollen gekommen?
Die Fehler-Warnung sollte aber angezeigt werden, wenn Du die Tests nicht in den Einstellungen deaktiviert hast oder die Warnung bzw das Objekt in  Deiner persönlichen "ignore"-Liste ist.
Prusaker (2022-12-13 11:02:30+00:00): Есть мнение, что название "Паўднёва-заходні абход г.п.Мір" должно быть в official_name, но никак не в name. Согласно "принципам обозначения дорог в РБ" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Belarus:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%8B_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3) в name должно быть собственное имя дороги, а термин "обход г.п.Мир" всё же скорее не является собственным именем, а скорее неким официальным наименованием участка дороги.
tbicr (2022-12-13 11:23:20+00:00): вітаю, было дададзена https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129930765 , то бок ня мною, я `name:be` толькі дадаў
Prusaker (2022-12-13 11:27:25+00:00): Прашу прабачэння. Я не ў той changeset написаў.
user_6110846 (2022-12-12 05:14:58+00:00): https://andrushkivska-gromada.gov.ua/docs/1260940/
johsin18 (2022-12-13 12:50:50+00:00): Hi MaxieMalente,
the Novartis Pavillon has been added already more than a year ago (30m to the North).  AFAIK Maps.me has not benn receiving map updates for ages, so the map you saw is probably very outdated.  Please don't add missing features based on that outdated baseline.  I recommend the OrganicMaps app, which is a Maps.me clone with up-to-date maps.
I will delete the duplicate again.
johsin18
Alexmol (2024-03-01 23:52:09+00:00): Olá.
De acordo com as boas práticas do OSM a etiqueta name não deve conter descrições, como é o caso da "Cota XXX (NPA YYY)". Sugiro que essa informação seja movida para a etiqueta "note" e que na etiqueta "name" fique apenas o nome da albufeira.

Cumprimentos
Alexandre Moleiro
ReleasedBait (2024-03-02 12:19:50+00:00): Olá,
Concordo, neste changeset se bem me lembro, simplesmente mantive as tags existentes pré existente. Novo changeset a caminho.
Alexmol (2024-03-02 12:27:23+00:00): Olá, obrigado.
Pareceu-me ver mais do género, irei corrigir as que vir então.

Alexandre
user_6110846 (2022-12-12 05:15:07+00:00): https://andrushkivska-gromada.gov.ua/docs/1260940/
Matanya Maya (2022-12-11 11:38:51+00:00): #Tivontrails
eggie (2022-12-11 17:32:47+00:00): Dag Mark..
Wanneer het een plan is dan 
highway=proposed
proposed=cycleway

Dat zie je dan nog niet op de kaart.
Wanneer er daadwerkelijk al iets wordt aangelegd dan
highway=construction
construction=cycleway

bicycle=yes hoort niet op een fietspad. Dat is default.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-11 17:36:00+00:00): Ik heb de construction aangepast naar G11 fietspad conform de aansluitende paden.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-12-11 17:37:30+00:00): Wanneer het pad gereed is kan de fietsknooppuntroute omgelegd worden. Dat kan niet met editor iD, wel met josm.
MVG
eggie
NorthCrab (2022-12-12 04:56:46+00:00): Witaj, inscription na takim dużym obszarze wygląda na błąd. Co to inscription: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription Chyba lepiej w tym przypadku użyć description. Pozdrawiam!