piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
adiatmad (2021-11-15 00:49:48+00:00): Halo Pamungkaassony. Semoga sehat selalu.
Anda menambahkan tag highway=yes (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1001989939) yang tidak ada di Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113724733
SmartFinn (2021-11-13 15:32:18+00:00): У этой линии уже есть название, оно указано в отношении. Значение которое вы указали - названием не является.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113724771
FUZZY_42 (2021-12-08 09:14:24+00:00): Тогда стоит то, что указанно в отношение продублировать в name, name:uk, name:ru, name:en, а то нигде не рендерится название этой опасной зоны бывших и потенциальных боевых действий.
eggie (2021-11-13 12:52:51+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht. De info samengoevoegd met de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
user_12625593 (2021-11-13 18:48:40+00:00): Beste Pelleke, je hebt nu iedere garagebox getagd als 'garages', dus meervoud. Dat is van toepassing als het één gebouw met een aantal garages is. 
Dat is hier niet het geval. Dit moet volgens mij 'garage', dus enkelvoud zijn. Pas je het aan?
Ser9ei (2021-11-13 15:14:06+00:00): living_street подразумевает foot=yes. Не надо указывать это отдельно. Изучите табличку со значениями по умолчанию: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Russia
Требуется указывать лишь те модификаторы доступа, которые не соответствуют значениям по умолчанию.
Sovushka (2021-11-24 21:08:58+00:00): Понял, спасибо.
Ser9ei (2021-11-13 15:09:32+00:00): Во-первых, там уже есть дом 6 ниже. Определитесь, где же он всё-таки.
Во-вторых, пожалуйста, читайте вики перед внесением правок.
Тег name предназначен исключительно для наименований: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
СНТ Медик - это не addr:street. Для этого есть addr:place: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
addr:city указывать избыточно для объектов внутри адм. границы, так как эта часть адреса наследуется из соответствующих границ.

Наименование СНТ не надо вешать на проезды. Как обозначить СНТ, читайте тут: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dallotments

Если не удаётся в чём-то разобраться, то всегда можно спросить в телеграм-чате @ruosm. Чем раньше начнёте читать вики и спрашивать, тем меньше ошибок потом придётся исправлять.
pesec (2021-11-16 05:15:25+00:00): Зачем нужно обозначать ограничения для движения на закрытой прилегающей территории?
Имеют ли они место быть и обозначены соответствующим знаком?
Если это запрет проезда, то должен быть блок, шлагбаум...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-13 10:29:37+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113466749, 113466767, 113466784, 113466815.
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 100732213, 100732226, 100732233, 101418892, 101418898, 101418907, 101418910, 106991656, 107761693, 107761745, 107761751, 107761784, 107761787, 107778088, 107778089, 107778112, 107778125, 107778128, 107781646, 107781656, 107781659, 107781661, 107781691, 109462861, 109462864, 99406291, 99406292, 99406294, 99406343, 99406354, 99601812, 99601822, 99601841, 99602070, 99602080.
ChehrehBargi (2023-05-18 16:19:26+00:00): سلام
در سَردَر موزه این شهر نوشته شده "موزه نقده" و شما نام آن را به موزه سولدوز تغییر داده اید. این نام می تواند در تگ old_name استفاده شود. تگ name برای نامی است که در تابلو یک محل درج می شود.
ChehrehBargi (2023-05-18 16:20:37+00:00): Above the museum of this city is written "Naghadeh Museum" and you have changed its name to Sulduz Museum. This name can be used in the old_name tag. The name tag is for the name that is inserted in the board of a place.
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 100732213, 100732226, 100732233, 101418892, 101418898, 101418907, 101418910, 106991656, 107761693, 107761745, 107761751, 107761784, 107761787, 107778088, 107778089, 107778112, 107778125, 107778128, 107781646, 107781656, 107781659, 107781661, 107781691, 109462861, 109462864, 99406291, 99406292, 99406294, 99406343, 99406354, 99601812, 99601822, 99601841, 99602070, 99602080.
mueschel (2021-11-15 11:09:19+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you're part of a larger group of people working  on a common project. Please make sure you and your team leader follow the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I found many different misspellings of a undocumented "structure number" tag. 
Please make sure you're only using only those tags that are available as presets in your editor or are documented on the Wiki.
mueschel (2021-11-15 11:09:14+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you're part of a larger group of people working  on a common project. Please make sure you and your team leader follow the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I found many different misspellings of a undocumented "structure number" tag. 
Please make sure you're only using only those tags that are available as presets in your editor or are documented on the Wiki.
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 09:08:17+00:00): 您好，MikesonZhang

想必在这个地方，您曾经有过一段可能快乐可能悲伤痛苦的会议，我们对此深表遗憾，并祝您能早日走出往日的记忆。

但OSM是一个反应现实中要素的地方，因此虽然这可能是一个感人的故事，我们也不得不清除掉后面的这段后缀。还望理解。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-13 11:02:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 113703578, 113703780, 113707163, 113709034, 113709205, 113714312, 113714797, 113723268, 113723570, 113723818, 113723929.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-13 12:45:09+00:00): Nodes accidentally moved to null island removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113729037 .
ivanbranco (2021-11-14 13:39:30+00:00): Hi Roy,

you're adding weird tags, you added stracter number, stractur enamber,
structer colour, structer number, structur number, structure number, Structure Number, structure Number, structure NUMBER, structure number, structurenumber and so on.

What' the meaning of this tag? Seems like a ref code to me. Maybe you can fix all the different tags you added with a ref=* one instead?
mueschel (2021-11-15 11:09:37+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you're part of a larger group of people working  on a common project. Please make sure you and your team leader follow the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I found many different misspellings of a undocumented "structure number" tag. 
Please make sure you're only using only those tags that are available as presets in your editor or are documented on the Wiki.
mueschel (2021-11-15 11:09:30+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you're part of a larger group of people working  on a common project. Please make sure you and your team leader follow the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I found many different misspellings of a undocumented "structure number" tag. 
Please make sure you're only using only those tags that are available as presets in your editor or are documented on the Wiki.
mueschel (2021-11-15 11:09:22+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you're part of a larger group of people working  on a common project. Please make sure you and your team leader follow the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I found many different misspellings of a undocumented "structure number" tag. 
Please make sure you're only using only those tags that are available as presets in your editor or are documented on the Wiki.
ivanbranco (2021-11-14 13:41:06+00:00): Hi TjipitoWhk,

please don't add "building" as name for the building. The nature of the element is already described with building=yes. Can you fix it?
user_13980615 (2021-11-13 11:22:49+00:00): 补充：同时删除了正门前的两个名为“卧龙岗”的观景点，因为已有区域标识的“卧龙岗”
mueschel (2021-11-15 11:10:02+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you're part of a larger group of people working  on a common project. Please make sure you and your team leader follow the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I found many different misspellings of a undocumented "structure number" tag. 
Please make sure you're only using only those tags that are available as presets in your editor or are documented on the Wiki.
Joopvdl (2022-01-15 20:56:09+00:00): Op 13 juli 2021 heb ik het gebouw (way 285356657) tussen 8A en 8B op de James Cookweg in Venlo verwijderd aangezien deze gesloopt is. (changeset 107931358)

Op 13 november 2021 voeg je het gebouw weer toe (way 1002005115) met de "demolished:building" tag.

Wat is de gedacht hier achter? Het lijkt mij vrij onoverzichtelijk worden als we elk gebouw wat ooit verwijderd is gaan toevoegen op de kaart.
JanWandelaar (2022-01-16 07:51:02+00:00): Dit gebouw staat nog steeds in de BAG als een bestaand gebouw. Om te voorkomen dat ik het per ongeluk weer toevoeg (het stond als ontbrekend gebouw gemeld), staat het nu als demolished in OSM. Als in de BAG het gebouw als gesloopt gemeld wordt, kan dit verwijderd worden.
mueschel (2021-11-15 11:09:34+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you're part of a larger group of people working  on a common project. Please make sure you and your team leader follow the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I found many different misspellings of a undocumented "structure number" tag. 
Please make sure you're only using only those tags that are available as presets in your editor or are documented on the Wiki.
mueschel (2021-11-15 11:09:27+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you're part of a larger group of people working  on a common project. Please make sure you and your team leader follow the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I found many different misspellings of a undocumented "structure number" tag. 
Please make sure you're only using only those tags that are available as presets in your editor or are documented on the Wiki.
mueschel (2021-11-15 11:09:24+00:00): Hi,
it looks like you're part of a larger group of people working  on a common project. Please make sure you and your team leader follow the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

I found many different misspellings of a undocumented "structure number" tag. 
Please make sure you're only using only those tags that are available as presets in your editor or are documented on the Wiki.
DeKaN (2021-11-14 10:49:57+00:00): Please split your changesets in future changes for covering a smaller area
juminet (2021-12-03 20:36:47+00:00): Bonjour Jacques,

Je dois dire que je ne suis pas d'accord avec ces changements. Le tag "coulour" doit être celui de la couleur de la balise. Plus important encore, le tag "osmc:symbol" doit suivre des règles précises, et en le transformant de la sorte, on ne rend plus correctement la balise ni sur hiking.waymarkedtrails, OsmAnd, ou hiking.osm.be. En particulier la troisième valeur de osmc:symbol doit être dans ce cas-ci "blue_rectangle", càd que la balise principale est un rectangle bleu.

Qu'en penses-tu?

Julien
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-15 08:55:21+00:00): Hi Kenno3000, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Kenno3000 (2021-11-15 12:08:35+00:00): yes just a test, i would like to delete it. I can't work how to you yet
eggie (2021-11-13 13:30:23+00:00): Dag Wilco..   Verbind de eindnodes van de onderdoorgang met de gebouwomtrek.

MVG
eggie
Wilco_VR_IJsselland (2021-11-13 17:45:05+00:00): Als het goed is zijn ze gekoppeld..
Voor mij ook een beetje nieuw om in JOSM te werken..
Kiek maar eens of het goed is.
Thanks voor de aanvulling
eggie (2021-11-13 17:59:36+00:00): Yep...  Dat is 'm!

Groet,
Eggie
woodpeck (2021-11-13 20:23:52+00:00): Sieht aus als ob das ein Fehler war. Ich stelle die Edits wieder her.
woodpeck_repair (2021-11-13 20:29:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113744245 where the changeset comment is: voreiligen Revert von Edits des Users Sunflyer19 revertiert
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:43:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
eggie (2021-11-13 13:04:34+00:00): Je vraagt feedback..
Ziet er goed uit.
bicycle=no op een wandelpad is al default.
Dat hoeft niet.
Staat er een bord verboden voor ruiters.
Editor vraagt of je van alles wilt invullen, maar dat is meestal onnodig.
MVG
eggie
Nakaner (2021-12-04 16:39:54+00:00): Hallo,

welchen Sinn und Zweck haben denn bitte die folgenden Objekte?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002018472 (Landnutzung war schon erfasst und v.a. viel detaillierter)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002018471 (der Radweg führt durch Häuser?!)

Viele Grüße

Michael
uwe-shwbl (2021-12-05 14:48:38+00:00): Hallo Michael,
Danke für den Hinweis.
Da habe ich wohl unbeabsichtigt Objekte gedoppelt und das beim Hochladen nicht bemerkt.
Viele Grüße
Uwe
cyton (2021-11-13 20:47:54+00:00): Ah, yeah sorry
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113729222
Paul The Archivist (2021-11-21 01:29:11+00:00): Hi, this change is incorrect, the spelling of the tag should be handrail:centre as I originally mapped it. OSM uses British English for tag spellings, not American English. I will revert. Thanks.
mueschel (2021-11-21 09:24:32+00:00): In general you are right, but in this particular case the American spelling is used. I have no idea why, but these are the statistics:

handrail:centre : 0 cases
handrail:center : 6154 cases
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/handrail:center
Paul The Archivist (2021-11-23 00:30:35+00:00): Yes, but the Taginfo statistics are meaningless when people other than the original mappers are changing it just in an attempt to standardize tags. I can't see any reason why this should have the American spelling, I think someone just made a mistake on the wiki! Pretty much every other tag with the word 'centre' uses this spelling eg leisure=sports_centre. I intend therefore (unless there is a good reason otherwise) to continue using this spelling. Thanks, Paul.
mueschel (2021-11-23 08:22:48+00:00): It's not just the Wiki - there's also a preset in JOSM and one renderer that claims to use this tag.
Paul The Archivist (2021-11-24 19:25:38+00:00): The preset has presumably been copied from the wiki, and is probably part of the reason why the 'center' spelling (which I consider incorrect in an OSM context) has become established rather than following the standard OSM convention. It's a relatively low usage tag and using the American spelling will cause confusion when other much more common tags eg leisure=sports_centre use the British English spelling. If you were to change any tags, it should be the ones with the 'center' spelling.
mueschel (2021-11-24 19:48:06+00:00): Well, the Wiki and Presets can be corrected. If you do that, I'm perfectly fine in changing tags to the then-documented spelling. Before that it just doesn't make sense to have two tags, one with a uncommon spelling, but documented and used - and one unknown, undocumented, seldomly used with the correct spelling.
Paul The Archivist (2021-11-24 21:24:20+00:00): At the moment I don't have the time for the hassle of putting together a proposal to change the spelling, and it wouldn't be right to do it without discussion first on the Tagging mailing list. I've already spent a ridiculous amount of time discussing this with you when I could be doing some actual mapping, and don't want to spend any longer on this. It's not a particularly essential tag when there is already a handrail:left and handrail:right, so who really cares if there are two spellings? I personally am not though going to add tags which are an error, when I do the work in surveying and mapping this in the first place.
kawino85 (2021-11-17 21:02:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Leo Slager (2021-11-14 13:31:35+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Hier is het eea fout gegaan.
Met de verplaatsing van het gras heb je ook het water dat daar aan vastgekleefd was verschoven.
Stel voor dat je deze changeset revert en de weg opnieuw los maakt maar dan zonder al die andere vlakken te verschuiven. ;-)
Leo Slager (2021-11-14 13:31:49+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113730061
eggie (2021-11-14 13:36:48+00:00): Hoi Leo
Ik kijk even...
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-14 13:40:28+00:00): reverted my own changeset by changeset #113763185
eggie (2021-11-14 13:44:03+00:00): Bedankt Leo voor de tip.
De landuse heb weer losgemaakt van de Zilverreiger. Of die wegen in aanleg er al echt zijn geen idee. Op Sat dataportaal zie ik niets. 
Gr eggie
trial (2026-02-11 21:26:13+00:00): Salut, sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5069915, Best-Est c'est intéressant (*) mais je pense que tu voulais dire Brest-Est ;-)

(*) mais on appele ça Saint-Marc ;-)
trial (2026-02-11 21:26:36+00:00): *appelle*
trial (2026-02-11 21:31:05+00:00): Et sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002025350, l'usage est de ne pas mettre d'abréviations : 
destination=Brest;Le Relecq-Kerhuon
zorglubu (2026-02-12 12:49:12+00:00): Pas de souci pour corriger, mais il semble que j'ai juste mis ce qu'on voit sur la route :-)
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=48.383536&lng=-4.3727724&pKey=308942523945524&x=0.40447495013504153&y=0.43556272512083605&zoom=0.35064050618500014&focus=photo
trial (2026-02-12 14:10:34+00:00): Je sais, tu remarqueras que je n'ai pas dit le contraire, j'ai dit que la convention était de mettre le vrai nom en entier dans OSM, c'est à dire le nom de la destination, PAS (nécessairement) ce qui est indiqué sur le panneau(*). Tout comme ce n'est pas parce que sur le terrain on a une Rue V. Hugo qu'on ne met pas Rue Victor Hugo dans OSM (mauvais exemple sans doute, le nom est assez court).
https://www.google.com/maps/@48.298865,-4.5564126,3a,15y,207.55h,86.66t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sq3MnyWejiejWcYNe6R42cQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D3.338962281571213%26panoid%3Dq3MnyWejiejWcYNe6R42cQ%26yaw%3D207.5514600350214!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDIwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D serait Camaret-sur-Mer, pas Camaret. Désolé pour la soruce, c'est juste pour illustrer.

(*) on en a parlé sur le forum en particulier @Penegal a été convaincu : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/defi-maproulette-correction-de-la-casse-majuscule-minuscule-des-destinations-routieres/37011/8
Penegal (2026-02-12 14:26:55+00:00): Je confirme les arguments de trial : on utilise le nom complet, même s’il est abrégé sur les panneaux. C’est contre-intuitif, certes mais l’idée, notamment, c’est que beaucoup de logiciels de navigation vont prononcer le nom… ce qui est difficile à faire avec un nom abrégé : bon courage pour faire deviner au logiciel que, mettons, « St. Mars la P. » se prononce comme « Saint-Mars-la-Pile ». ;-)
zorglubu (2026-02-12 17:31:13+00:00): Oui. Vous avez complètement raison ! Le but n'est pas de décrire un panneau mais d'indiquer la destination.
Penegal (2026-02-12 18:01:51+00:00): Décrire un panneau complètement serait infaisable, et pas forcément pertinent ; en revanche, on peut indiquer les symboles (autoroute, monument historique, port…) avec `destination:symbol=*`, les couleurs d’arrière-plan avec `destination:colour=*` et ainsi de suite.
eggie (2021-11-13 14:43:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mgn2016 (2021-11-13 14:55:33+00:00): Dankjewel. De tip "beperk jezelf" zal ik ook ter harte nemen. Mijn bijdragen heb ik gedaan via StreetComplete, en dat is best verslavend.
eggie (2021-11-13 15:08:28+00:00): Hoi Mgn

Houd je vooral niet in.
Die beperking geldt meer voor de reguliere editors als iD en Josm.
Veel plezier met mappen..
Eggie
Leo Slager (2021-11-13 23:21:37+00:00): Please do not use 
maxheight=below_default
And not on a node.
Put maxheight:signed=no 
and on the way !
mgn2016 (2021-11-14 09:30:35+00:00): Thank you for correcting me. But while I do understand the point you're making, I am not sure how I could have prevented this, as I have only answered a StreetComplete quest.

As it happens, this is an exit only (for cars that is, residents can enter it on foot). So max-height does not really apply here, and there is no sign. So I have tried to answer it accordingly. Apparently, this resulted in a maxheight=below_default on a node.
Leo Slager (2021-11-14 12:59:51+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
I understand why you did it.
Leo Slager (2021-11-14 13:09:08+00:00): Accordingly with the entrance on Van Halewijnlaan I changed maxheight to 2 meter.
SekeRob (2021-11-13 14:53:05+00:00): Thank you for letting every mapper know between Leeds and Napels. Why parkings near Nottingham and something in Italy is in the same edit set we do not want to know. It just should not be and could have been saved on a site by site basis to only tell the local folk.

Thanks in advance for doing that the next time.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-13 18:30:26+00:00): @SekeRob  I suspect that what's happened here is that OsmAnd is set to only upload chnangesets at certain times - perhaps the author of the change doesn't have active SIM card data in both Italy and the UK (OsmAnd is a mobile phone editor, of course).
Muhmaker (2021-11-14 07:43:18+00:00): Moin, mir ist aufgefallen, dass du manchmal mit unsichtbaren Inseln in Gewässern zu kämpfen hast. Ich denke das hat damit zu tun, dass hier die Gewässerfläche aus Sicht des Renderers doppelt definiert ist. Einmal als Eigenschaft des gesamten Multipolygons und einmal als Eigenschaft nur des outer-Objekts. Soweit ich das verstehe gehören die Eigenschaften der "größeren" Fläche an das Multipolygon und nichts an das Outer-Objekt. Die abweichenden Eigenschaften der inner-Objekte werden dann vom Renderer erkannt und anders dargestellt. Bitte vorsichtig sein wenn du bestehende "einfache" Wasserflächen in Multipolygone umbauen willst. Bereits eingetragene Eigenschaften wie Name oder Wikieinträge oder ähnliches sollten dann natürlich an das neue Multipolygon übertragen werden
DeFra85 (2021-11-15 21:22:41+00:00): Okay, wenn ich das jetzt richtig verstanden habe muss das outer-Objekt einfach eine eigenschaftslose, geschlossene Linie sein. Und die nachträglich erstellte Relation als Multipolygon ist der eigentliche See.
Richtig???
Muhmaker (2021-11-16 06:21:54+00:00): Genau. Die Insel ist hier jetzt auch sichtbar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113730902
user_14250389 (2021-12-27 10:48:48+00:00): 你好，請不要用ref來代替name

雖然渲染出來的效果上是一個方框中帶著名稱，很好看，但是請不要為了美觀而這樣做。道路名稱需要填在name中，ref中只可以填S101，G32這樣的代號。

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339141682

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/759379999

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757643926

這三條路我已經幫你改正（ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115419812 ），貴地其他圖徵還需您自行檢查，感謝理解。
blackboxlogic (2021-12-14 02:35:54+00:00): Your wikidata link pointed to something on the other side of the country. It's been fixed already, just a reminder to check your work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113731557
Lejun (2021-12-14 10:42:26+00:00): My bad, thanks for pointing it out!
philippec (2021-11-13 17:24:58+00:00): Antwerpen Marnixstrat 14 aed, mapillary aub.
stijnh (2021-11-19 07:24:16+00:00): new mapillary is added
philippec (2021-11-21 15:59:07+00:00): Gefixt.    Dat is dan nr 1276.   Bovendien hebben we nu de Marnixstraat in beide richtingen.  Ik vermoed dat er in Antwerpen een aantal op komst zijn, maar ik vind er niets over.
Ik ben wel bang dat er nu een dubbele adresnode is, maar dat is mijn specialiteit niet.
eggie (2021-11-13 18:55:51+00:00): Hi kawino please decrease your mapping area.
Please add proper comment with your uploads.
What do you mean with Hoogeind, Helmond ?
Greetz,
eggie