piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2019-05-31 14:54:03+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I made a few amendments to your tagging to better meet OSM practices. Also added a few things.

Regards Bernard.
Aleksa M (2019-05-31 18:45:56+00:00): Next time when you edit, please be sure not to update terrible wavy roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5210062 . That road was absolutely fine prior to your editing. You don't have to mess up the whole intersection in order to add some oneway tags. It's ok, I will fix everything, but please be more careful and thorough.
maraf24 (2019-05-31 17:22:24+00:00): Wycofane.
Supaplex (2019-08-09 16:32:30+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
iWowik (2019-06-24 22:11:42+00:00): Собюлюдайте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о языке:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Be:Belarus:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8B_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%96%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9E

Не вынуждайте другйх участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
pantufla (2021-02-12 08:50:02+00:00): Hola Wilmer, quizás deberíamos borrar este cuadrado gigante que así sólo no ayuda mucho. Así podremos dibujar las áreas vegetadas de otra manera. Qué dices?
Wilmer Osario (2021-02-12 12:09:10+00:00): Bien, estoy de acuerdo.
SomeoneElse (2019-07-03 18:50:07+00:00): Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693742010 actually exist?
trigpoint (2019-05-31 14:34:25+00:00): Hi
You seem to have created a very large changeset that does little other than add bicycle=yes to the A49. Any other changes are hidden behind this mass of pointless tags. Bicycle=yes is not needed as if router doesn't want to route a bike down a UK trunk road arguably its a bug with that router and that should be fixed rather than tagging for the router in OSM.
Cheers Phil
Pete Owens (2019-05-31 17:43:28+00:00): OSM default for what it classes as "trunk" roads (which is different from UK definition) is "unknown".
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-02 06:03:47+00:00): #test #failed ?

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-18 14:34:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83745132 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Saudi Arabia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82081785 for more info
Leo Slager (2019-06-02 13:43:02+00:00): review_requested:
goed gezien die spelfout.
En op een éénrichtingsverkeersweg is de toevoeging :forward niet per se noodzakelijk. Dat heeft alleen nut (cq moet) op een tweerichtings weg.
Supaplex (2019-08-09 16:32:46+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2019-05-31 17:06:41+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended your opening hours to suit OSM best practice.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-12 10:06:28+00:00): Hello,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693750876 a valid ferry?  It doesn't look like one.
Best Regards,
Andy
sannkc (2019-06-04 00:37:19+00:00): Just to clarify, Flyer Place is the residential subdivision name.  These can be found in the official city property records.  For example, 6016 Fyler: https://dynamic.stlouis-mo.gov/citydata/newdesign/data.cfm?Handle=14763260140  (Refer to the section titled "Legal Description").
erikstl (2019-06-04 01:09:59+00:00): Just to clarify my point, however, the City of St. Louis, in practice doesn't operate on these subdivision names. The city is broken down into neighborhoods (this area is Lindenwood Park, for example). 

I understand that there are subdivision additions that were created, but, /in practice/ they are not used.
sannkc (2019-06-04 23:54:45+00:00): From what I've seen with other cities (NYC, Chicago, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh, Milwaukee), the neighborhood designations you have in mind are most often mapped in OSM as administrative boundaries.  No one has done that yet for St. Louis.
sannkc (2019-06-11 02:16:11+00:00): The official neighborhood boundaries/names have now been added for St. Louis.  Hope they check out okay. If you notice any errors, feel free to let me know.
mehdiabrash (2019-09-14 14:22:56+00:00): My address is changed
Allison P (2019-06-02 06:31:01+00:00): I've noticed a similarly named account- https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ISTC_GIS. It seems like both are in use. Using multiple accounts does not violate the rules, but I want to verify if both accounts are real. Is there anyone I can contact to verify this account?

Also, this changeset seems odd to me. I drive through this intersection often, and though my memory is not very good, I don't remember any construction happening here. Are you sure your data is up to date? Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Thanks,
        Reid Pelton
SK53 (2019-06-23 10:14:30+00:00): Please try & keep changes made with maproulette to what is in the description, or expand the changeset comment so that it is explanatory (e.g, adding brand tags using iD presets). It's difficult to assess exactly what you've changed with such a sparse and inaccurate comment.

Additionally you have changed leisure=youth_club to club=yes which removes information. Please do not follow iD's preset suggestions without thought, particularly in an area with active mappers who may well disagree with decisions taken by the authors of iD (who have recently removed some of their more controversial validations: https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/2267)

Additionally mass updates like this make it rather harder to find real changes when doing ground surveys. I use Vespucci which highlights objects not edited for a while. This type of edit means that it looks as though someone has recently checked things, when in fact it's a someone not in the area. For instance you edited HSBC, but actually the name changed to HSBC UK months ago, and I may have missed this if I had not been explicitly looking for it.

By all means do some other changes, but preferably in separate changesets from the Maproulette challenge. This is particularly useful in cases where local mapping convention might be at odds with what iD sees as the convention. (None particularly in this case, most changes genuinely seem to be from less-well used to more widely used tags: artwork to artwork_type, barrier=entrance to entrance=yes etc, but there are certainly others).

I'd also avoid adding healthcare tags on doctors & dentists etc. These are not widely used by consuming apps & add noise to local changes).


Jerry
jambamkin (2019-06-23 21:07:14+00:00): Hi Jerry, 

Thanks for the detailed feedback, I'll take on all your hints. The MapRoulette single changeset thing makes a lot of sense.

It does seem that I'm the perfect individual to be on the wrong side of the iD preset controversy; confident enough to to go ahead and make changes but new enough to think that the developers of the /edit part of the project should be making it possible for people to apply suggested edits in good faith and not do anything controversial. The healthcare thing in particular takes me by surprise, It seems very careless on iD's part. I know better now.

I don't follow your Vespucci/HSBC example are you suggesting I should not make any edits to an object if I'm not going to make 'all' the edits?

James
SK53 (2019-06-24 14:11:07+00:00): Probably a sensible thing is to check actual UK usage of a tag (e.g., heathcare: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/healthcare). The basic problem with healthcare is that it never gained traction (similarly with education) and has never really been tested in real-life (e.g., by a ward-by-ward mapping of a large hospital). I see no harm in adding the tags *providing* you are editing it for other reasons (something I'll do with brand:wiki* tags).

The overall problem with doing updates to POIs when mapping remotely is that it can give other mappers a false perspective that an area has recently been checked by someone. This is particularly true if one is in the field with Vespucci as it highlights POIs un-touched for a certain time (typically a year). It's probably not so critical in Nottingham because when re-surveying I usually like to check each POI, but I certainly pay *more* attention to those outline in pink.

It is also true that an obviously out-of-date area conveys information to someone using OSM data (e.g., a Lloyds-TSB is probably a good sign not to trust information on local pubs). This is why the current "Ghosts" listing encourages people to go & visit places because it is likely that far more things need updating.

Jerry
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-31 15:20:36+00:00): Thanks!
yellowsoar (2019-05-31 15:22:23+00:00): And the rest too. XD
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70812578
whb (2019-08-08 11:58:03+00:00): Offensichtlich Unsinn.
ma-rt-in (2019-08-08 13:20:53+00:00): Dann mal schnell weg damit, weil das ist echt kappes.
anilredd (2019-08-13 11:12:31+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for bringing this up. pddondet has left the organization, hence I am responding on this changeset on his behalf.
We agree that the highway tag should be given as foot path rather than pedestrian. 
As the road represents a footway, the editor wrongly assumed it to be a pedestrian (as it conveys a similar meaning to footpath) and gave a wrong highway classification. 
we will take this up as a learning and implement them in our future editing.

Regards,
Anil.
anilredd (2019-08-13 12:13:54+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the bringing this up. pddondet has left the organization, hence I am responding on this changeset on his behalf. 
The editor has seen a board with no motor vehicle access at the entrance and changed mv access = no. He missed on checking the access to residence.
Its a miss from our end and we accept the mistake. We will ensure that this does not repeat and improve our editing from further edits.

Regards,
Anil.
Bonix-Mapper (2019-09-04 20:35:26+00:00): GUSTAVO GUAZZELLI NANNI,

Apenas para verificar, o nome que você deu a este prédio é real?

Caso ainda não participe, temos dois grupos no telegram para mapeadores brasileiros:

1- https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade
2 - https://t.me/osmsp

Até mais.
Bonix-Mapper (2019-09-04 20:37:15+00:00): Ah...

Estou me referindo ao "mijódromo" mapeada na PUC-SP.

Até mais.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-31 17:30:22+00:00): Hello brownsc and welcome to OpenStreetmap.
You've added a number of dubious features such as 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693758430 .  Some have already been removed and people have asked you about others (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7624691 ).  Please do reply; if you don't we'll have to remove them.
Best Regards,
Andy
brownsc (2019-05-31 23:06:50+00:00): Sorry I'm new and was experimenting to find a way to make the map calculate trans-oceanic routes by starting from the nearest valid connection instead of simply saying "no way to calculate," but I still don't know how to use the features very well, my apologies
SomeoneElse (2019-06-01 07:50:04+00:00): Thanks brownsc.
Any data that you add to openstreetmap.org is shared with everybody, so only add a ferry (or a motorway!) between two places if you know that a regular ferry service actually exists there.
If you'd like any help about whatever it is that you're trying to do you could try asking at https://help.openstreetmap.org/ .  Do any of the other ferries and connecting roads need to be removed?  I'm thinking of examples like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446428559 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693649913 ?
Best Regards,
Andy
brownsc (2019-06-01 13:12:58+00:00): Petropavlovsk-Korsakov is a real route and is operated by SASCO. The others no, except Dakar-Recife which is a common human trafficking route, but I don't believe that's what you're looking for here. Is there a way I can make my own sandbox edits that don't affect everyone else's maps?
brownsc (2019-06-01 13:59:15+00:00): Oh yes also the Cartagena ferry is real
SomeoneElse (2019-06-01 14:00:19+00:00): > except Dakar-Recife which is a common human trafficking route, but I don't believe that's what you're looking for here. 

No, it's not a ferry.

There is a test database at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ which you could add whatever data you wanted to, but I'm not aware of a router than uses that as input data.  Depending on what you actually want to do, it might be worth asking at help.openstreetmap.org.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-06-01 14:08:41+00:00): > Oh yes also the Cartagena ferry is real

Can you update the real ones with what info you know and then delete the others that aren't?

Best Regards,
Andy
Dimacn (2019-06-02 02:49:09+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение карты. Но не следует использовать тег leisure=park для обозначения благоустроенных дворовых территорий - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите добавленный вами парк отдыха.
Supaplex (2019-05-31 17:35:49+00:00): Duplicated
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3867798199
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70812855
Tómas Ingi (2019-05-31 16:37:32+00:00): Hi brownsc,

Do you have a source for the ferry going between Iceland and Greenland? As far as I'm aware, no such service exists, but if you could provide a source it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Tómas Ingi
brownsc (2019-05-31 23:06:31+00:00): Sorry I'm new and was experimenting to find a way to make the map calculate trans-oceanic routes by starting from the nearest valid connection instead of simply saying "no way to calculate," but I still don't know how to use the features very well, my apologies
KingKratos (2024-07-16 01:29:04+00:00): None Of these building are mapped right
dieterdreist (2019-06-03 16:30:15+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM. Please do not spam the tags, we are collecting geographic information, the description you provided was way to marketing speechy. I noticed your edit because you deleted the building where you business is in. I have now restored it, please be careful.

Cheers,
Martin
5m4u9 (2019-06-03 03:01:15+00:00): rest_area son para los autos, qué se quiere informar? un area de descanso (hierba desbrozada) en el camino?
Allison P (2019-05-31 20:52:59+00:00): Thanks for adding more tags. I cleaned them up a little bit and added a new feature, let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-31 19:28:06+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70815017
eggie (2019-05-31 17:17:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

*( Prullenvakken hebben normaliter geen name=Prullenbak Westland. Graag die namen verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
Sharpq (2019-05-31 17:41:41+00:00): Is goed, was al verbaast dat er namen bij 'moesten' ik bewerkte namelijk uit de app OsmAnd.

Moet ik ze opnieuw toevoegen (de prullenbakken)? Aangezien ik ze nu niet meer zie staan.
eggie (2019-05-31 18:08:17+00:00): Die app's willen dat je van alles invult, maar dat is niet nodig. De prullenbakken staan er gewoon. De rendering is vandaag traag. F5 en in=uitzoomen wil wel eens helpen. 
Deze humanitarian layer is vaak sneller   https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70814437#map=19/52.04288/4.56853&layers=H
Succes verder,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-31 17:24:45+00:00): Namen svp verwijderen
ndm (2019-05-31 23:29:02+00:00): The change in Bristol is wrong and doesn't match the changeset comment!

Maybe this should all be reverted -- validator is throwing up stuff that should be fixed locally (or at least in smaller changesets).
JulienBalas (2019-06-03 08:10:11+00:00): Hi
sorry for having introduced some errors.
I've reverted the changeset.
Can you tell me what was wrong in Bristol ?
Best regards
ndm (2019-06-03 09:09:31+00:00): I'm not a fan of large changesets. When I looked with achavi there was a change that made a building detached that should be connected in Bristol - which wasn't reflected in the comment. If you're having trouble finding the issue in your change so will other mappers. Other changes might have been ok - but very hard to tell.
eggie (2019-05-31 17:24:22+00:00): Graag naam prullenbak fietspad verwijderen
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-05-31 17:39:03+00:00): Alle namen van de prullenbakken heb ik inmiddels verwijderd.
Bedankt voor je bijdragen.
MVG,
Eggie
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-31 19:30:30+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70815017
brownsc (2019-05-31 23:08:00+00:00): Sorry I'm new and was experimenting to find a way to make the map calculate trans-oceanic routes by starting from the nearest valid connection instead of simply saying "no way to calculate," but I still don't know how to use the features very well, my apologies
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-31 19:29:03+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70815089
brownsc (2019-05-31 23:07:42+00:00): Sorry I'm new and was experimenting to find a way to make the map calculate trans-oceanic routes by starting from the nearest valid connection instead of simply saying "no way to calculate," but I still don't know how to use the features very well, my apologies
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-04 09:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-02 06:04:09+00:00): #test #failed ?

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Константин Гам (2019-07-04 14:26:53+00:00): А вы уверены что на тропе вдоль невки установлен знак "Движение на велосипеде запрещено"?
ghostofc (2019-07-04 16:08:35+00:00): такого знака там точно нет, но есть нюанс -- западный выход настолько узкий, что протащить там велосипед трудно
Константин Гам (2019-07-05 08:07:08+00:00): Так обозначьте ширину! Рулетка в помощь.
Это позволит выбирать пользователю может он проехать или нет с помощью своего навигатора.
ghostofc (2019-07-05 15:02:59+00:00): Да, хорошая идея, спасибо за совет.
ghostofc (2019-07-11 01:19:23+00:00): Добавил ширину.
mavl (2019-12-04 09:01:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-04 09:01:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
sovereign_ch (2019-05-31 21:12:47+00:00): Was jetzt? "dog=yes" oder "dogs=yes"?! Korrigiere das bitte, sonst wische ich demnächst mal mit dem Stahlbesen drüber. Danke
richlv (2019-06-05 14:31:17+00:00): Hi, this changeset has removed a lot of map data. For example, here footways, fences and all other detail has been deleted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/57.09902/22.96025&layers=N .
Example deleted footway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692284646/history .

What happened in this edit?
richlv (2019-06-20 20:32:38+00:00): Hi, have you had a chance to look into this topic?
I have also sent you a personal message, please check it at your convenience.

On the note of communication, are you subscribed to the Latvian OSM mailing list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv ? If not, it would be great to join there, we could discuss all the detail.
richlv (2019-07-06 16:31:02+00:00): Hi arcth, have you had a moment to check this topic?
arcth (2019-08-12 21:19:48+00:00): Hi,

most buildings and highways around Lamiņi were displaced by 20-30 metres to match unaligned sat images. There was quite a lot of other issues including forests and cemeteries tagged as parks, broken route relation, randomly placed tree rows, etc. I could have deleted the footway and some other features by mistake while trying to sort these out.

Concerning the fence, on the sat images it is neither circular nor centred at the watertower.
richlv (2019-08-13 14:55:38+00:00): Thank you for the response and all the map improvements, it's now much more clear what happened there.

Perhaps it is worth leaving a comment such changesets to see whether the original mapper can improve the situation themselves, and to avoid miscommunication.

I see that most of the detail has been re-mapped, I hope it is of much better quality now.
Enock4seth (2019-06-06 03:14:52+00:00): Welcome. "Added Cafe" is better changeset comment
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
eggie (2019-05-31 18:55:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Beter niet de adresnummers veranderen in OSM. Alle adressen zijn import vanuit het kadaster. Vaak liigen die adressen op een hoopje op elkaar.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-31 19:02:08+00:00): Het is inmiddels aangepast door een andere mapper
mavl (2019-12-04 09:01:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].