piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
julcnx (2021-08-07 16:26:18+00:00): Please refrain from adding residential roads within farming estate.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107949314
Ciro03 (2026-03-19 18:34:19+00:00): Hola. ¿De dónde se sacaron los nombres de las calles rurales?
Supaplex (2021-07-14 12:05:52+00:00): Reverted the boundary relation to its previous edition
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107978719
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107949760
manojkmohan (2022-02-10 02:14:21+00:00): This edit modified and did issues with boundary relations of Cherthala south & Kadakarappally Panchayaths. Pls care next time
manojkmohan (2022-02-10 02:14:33+00:00): This edit modified and did issues with boundary relations of Cherthala south & Kadakarappally Panchayaths. Pls care next time
julcnx (2021-08-11 02:48:18+00:00): There is no clear road on satellite, geometry overlays buildings. Likely not residential. Reverting change
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107950694
julcnx (2021-08-11 04:05:27+00:00): My apologies, I have used the wrong imagery. I still changed to service, as most likely within private land.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107950694
rthik007 (2021-07-15 03:41:37+00:00): Hi hojun1017,
fixed the geometry of secondary road way 199549912 as it was misaligned. 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108009158
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107951148
marczoutendijk (2021-07-14 10:02:42+00:00): Hello hn77,
Your changeset comment "ok" is not very helpful to other mappers. Please read te wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2021-07-14 17:18:22+00:00): User has been blocked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5225
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Russ McD (2023-03-19 08:03:39+00:00): arpit_a : Why did you add this way ? - It does not connect to the private road North, and is in fact the garden of a private house.  Are you #Grab remote people are inventing roads to get paid ?
I have changed it.
tux67 (2021-07-14 08:25:45+00:00): Hallo Rico2R
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Da die Straße auf dem NRW DOP nicht zu sehen ist, solltest du beim Upload bitte immer deine sonstigen Quellen mit angeben ..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107952119
maraf24 (2021-08-30 16:34:58+00:00): Te budynki były wyburzone ponad 10 lat temu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964197361
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964197360
tekim (2021-07-14 13:19:39+00:00): You are tagging side walks as bicycle=yes, but you don't cite a source to support this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107953012
tekim (2021-07-14 23:07:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550315563 certainly looks like a zebra crossing, yet you changed it to crossing=marked.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107953012
Russ McD (2023-01-23 01:44:45+00:00): kan_dala #grab : you have added a number of small service roads here, all of which cross the westbound highway and connect to the east.
This is poor tardy mapping and I hope you can review your other edits and correct, instead of us local mappers having to fix all the time.
I have fixed the ones I come across.
julcnx (2021-08-13 11:13:18+00:00): Please refrain from tagging agricultural tracks as residential
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107954868
nevw (2021-07-14 08:16:35+00:00): Hi
Cliff lines should appear on the osm with the triangles pointing to the low side. You appear to have drawn the cliff lines in the wrong direction and the ones you have drawn appear as crevices. Please search the wiki for more information on mapping these. Can you check if they need fixing as I expect you are trying to map steep sided rising rock formations.
nevw (2021-07-18 09:25:16+00:00): These are fixed now.
Tks
julcnx (2021-08-07 12:54:56+00:00): You added a road that does not exist. Please refrain from adding poor-quality changes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107955754
gscscnd (2021-07-14 11:04:18+00:00): Most został otwarty trzy dni temu — https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107778399 — u mnie mapa się odświeżyła krótko po tym zestawie zmian. Może masz stare kafelki w pamięci przeglądarki.
Smk___________ (2021-07-15 07:58:01+00:00): Hmm to sie poprawnie wyswietla na warstwie transport oraz openstreetmap. Na opencyclemap jest dziura.
gscscnd (2021-07-15 09:35:58+00:00): OpenCycleMap się dosyć rzadko aktualizuje.

Zobacz przy okazji CyclOSM (jako niezłą mapę dla rowerzystów, nie chodzi mi o problem z mostem).
Smk___________ (2021-07-15 09:41:20+00:00): Tak myślałem, zeby po prostu jeszcze poczekać. Dzięki.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-17 15:16:28+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937784599 really doesn't make any sense here.  You've added it as a country (admin_level=2) but without a name.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-07-17 15:17:18+00:00): Բարեւ,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937784599 այստեղ իսկապես իմաստ չունի: Դուք այն ավելացրել եք որպես երկիր (admin_level = 2), բայց առանց անունի:
Հարգանքներով
Էնդի
ToniE (2021-07-14 07:36:12+00:00): Oops, statt Untergeschoss die Gleise verbogen ... ist korrigiert
Vinber (2021-07-19 17:14:34+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue.

Si vous souhaitez décrire le fait que ce compte est utilisé par la mairie, vous pouvez ajouter cette information dans votre profil.

Cela ne sert pas dans le commentaire , et ce n'est pas parce que vous êtes la commune que cela donne confiance mais juste parce que vous le faites :)

Bonne cartographie
starsep (2021-07-14 09:57:53+00:00): Dzięki za pierwszą edycję! Dodałem adres email oraz cuisine=belarusian.
Zauważyłem, że godziny otwarcia się nie zgadzają z tymi na stronie - zweryfikuję to z właścicielem mailem lub odwiedzę lokal niedługo.
ravali_78 (2021-07-15 03:39:49+00:00): Hi Hữu Sơn,
I have fixed the alignment of dragged ways.Kindly check with way 897884353,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108009144.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107958867
SekeRob (2021-07-15 10:10:29+00:00): Hi,

I believe McDonald are never mapped with a location name, just McDonald's. Unfortunately I wiped my cloud photos used for mapping the facility but my recollection is there are 2 big totems outside, the much taller shouting 'McDrive'. The smaller has McCafé on it. If at all I think the area might be mapped McDrive, done so, and the building McDonald's, albeit your change did not take effect, it's still called McDrive ;P). Also added the drive-through tag as it's McDrive after all, the design of this location.

cheers.
starsep (2021-07-14 10:07:35+00:00): Zmieniłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107968633
cuisine=vegan;vegetarian na diet:vegan=yes oraz diet:vegetarian=yes

Aczkolwiek na oko w menu opcje wege są raczej ograniczone.
Postaram się też zgłosić do OrganicMaps, że opcje vegan/vegetarian są uznane za przestarzałe w diet.
Richard (2021-07-14 08:15:06+00:00): Aaargh, bugger, forgot to close one changeset before starting the next. Apologies.
Russ McD (2022-11-10 08:42:51+00:00): karolla_j
Thanks for adding Way: 964218917.  I tried to drive my car down it today - it is a FOOTWAY with three bollards in the centre.
Why can you GRAB editors not be more careful instead of adding everything you see without checking a streetview ??
I have fixed your mistake.
Supaplex (2021-07-14 12:35:32+00:00): 不好意見，你好像有重覆畫到既有建築的狀況，能否說明一下為何要再次繪製。如果是原先建築的問題可以修改既有建築
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107960480
literan (2021-07-19 16:15:43+00:00): и не будет
datendelphin (2021-08-21 13:30:20+00:00): Die Gelateria teilt aber das Gebäude mit dem Klo. Das wäre besser ein Punkt geblieben, und die Gelateria auch in den Umriss verschieben
julcnx (2021-08-11 08:28:06+00:00): please refrain from tagging agriculture tracks as residential https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107963144
mani_sh5 (2022-04-18 11:23:05+00:00): "Hi cmoffroad,
Trust you are well, Thanks for reviewing the data. We will make sure to follow the update for rest of the scenarios.
"
Thank you!
mani_sh5
eggie (2021-07-14 10:20:32+00:00): Dag jrebergen

Beet je twijfelgeval om de landuse=construction te verwijderen, want er wordt toch nog volop gebouwd? 
De construction heb ik ook maar van de wegen gehaald hier en wat uitgelijnd met de BGT. Die staan open.
Een update van de bebouwing kun je aanvragen via get forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Doe je dat zelf?

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Inlog identiek aan OSM account.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-14 15:33:44+00:00): BAG update aangevraagd op het forum.. Even als voorbeeld hoe zoiets gaat. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=835094#p835094
Gr eggie
luziferius (2021-07-14 09:24:33+00:00): additional source: survey
majkaz (2021-07-19 08:41:29+00:00): Ahoj,
v té stavbě ti zbylo dětské hřiště. Nebylo by vhodné ho smazat?
sokol15 (2021-07-19 10:34:37+00:00): To hřiště tam je, je nové. Ještě není zcela hotové, okolo je hlína a jezdí tam bagry. Ale kolotoč se zdál použitelný. Jde to otagovat jako construction=leisure? Nebo jak? Zatím jsem přidal access=no, což ale také není pravda, protože přístupu nic nebrání.
julcnx (2021-08-12 13:02:45+00:00): please refrain from tagging agricultural tracks as residential. Split the road into 2 segments when the first part is part of a residential area. thank you https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107965375
maraf24 (2021-08-10 17:39:03+00:00): A co ze zgodnością z orto?
Warin61 (2021-09-27 07:13:39+00:00): Hi,
There is no gate in this fence...
eggie (2021-07-14 10:07:22+00:00): Hoi,

Ik vernoed alleen dat die turning_circle
(straks?)  niet meer bestaat. wellicht is die nu nog in functie?
Op het noordelijke stukje fietspad ontbreken nog de conditionaltags.

Wanneer het gewoon een nieuwe situatie wordt en er hievoor nog geen wegen waren kun je wellicht beter
highway=construction
construction=cycleway

en 
highway=construction
construction=unclassified
 gebruiken

Bij bestaande wegen die tijdelijk zijn afgesloten gebruiken we wel de conditionaltagging. 

Up to you!
Eggie
abakus_uploader (2021-07-14 22:31:16+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Mevess (2021-10-13 09:12:05+00:00): Osmose m'indique que "national" doit d'écrire avec une majuscule, y'a t'il un endroit ou indiqué à osmose cette particularité ?
Syl (2021-07-16 16:49:49+00:00): Bonjour, il y avait déjà des toilettes très proches : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3983657495
Ce sont les mêmes ?
Syl (2022-02-25 18:15:05+00:00): C'était effectivement les mêmes, je viens de corriger.
aweech (2021-07-14 15:34:30+00:00): Hi,
In this edit, you abbreviated the directions in the address. These are fully spelled out in OpenStreetMap. Also, many buildings, including this one, have 90° angles at each corner. The editor you were using includes a tool to help make these square angles. You select the building and press the "q" button, or you right click it and select the option to square corners.
pabi12 (2021-07-15 09:42:30+00:00): Hi aweech, 
Thank you for your concern, I always use 'q' button after making bounding box and there was not expanded form of the address on OSM for this I left as it was available.
tekim (2021-07-14 14:13:03+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

This looks like someone's driveway, and indeed it is tagged as highway=service, service=driveway, in which case it is unlikely to have a name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107968018
felipeeugenio (2023-02-06 12:18:01+00:00): Hello. I have notices that there are several railways on the north of Chile that you have turn from rail to "abandoned"
That´s a tag for when the rails have been removed (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned).
As far as I know Tocopilla branch is still there and in use (barely) Do you have additional information or it is merely a mistake?
regards
eggie (2021-07-14 10:58:52+00:00): Dag Polleke,

Tip.. Gebruik de linker alttoets tijdens intekenen. Dat voorkomt al dat vastplakken aan de landuse forest e.d.
Dat is niet gewenst.
Paden die je laat eindigen op de landuse routeren niet. 
Zie hier je edits..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107970068

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-14 11:05:50+00:00): paden losgemaakt van landuse en doorverbonden met het wegennet.
gr eggie
Polleke2 (2021-07-14 20:50:41+00:00): Hallo eggie,
Dank voor je hulp!!
Ik zal er in het vervolg op letten.

MvG, Paul
eggie (2021-07-14 20:55:43+00:00): Paul.. Voordat je te veel aan die editor iD went.. kijk eens naar editor editor josm 

stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710     

Overigens is in josm de linker ctrl knop dan de toets om plakken te voorkomen. :) 

Mapse,
eggie
ralley (2021-07-14 19:47:58+00:00): You have tagged the roof as flat but from the LINZ aerial imagery it appears to be hipped whilst the adjacent roof is flat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107970691
SafetyIng (2021-07-14 11:15:26+00:00): How could this way be a track?
girinj (2021-07-16 11:36:27+00:00): Hello SafeyIng, 

Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the track road based on the satellite imagery and more over the segment is leading to a farm land and all the interconnecting roads are already tagged as track rods. Please let me know if there is any error with this road and let me know the scope of the modification.

Regards,
girinj
SafetyIng (2021-07-16 12:27:44+00:00): See at the Wiki for track..... 
"Roads used for access to permanent human settlements or facilities should generally not use this tag."

For more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
girinj (2021-07-23 08:59:17+00:00): Hi SafetyIng, 

Thanks for your response. In this scenario, I can find a road leading to human settlement and the pavement looks like the track which is shown in the examples of OSM wiki. Please look into the changeset(108433013) as per your suggestions. can you please guide on how to go ahead in these kind of scenario, can we prioritize the human settlement over the pavement(similar to track) of the road and create a service road. Please let us know your thoughts on this. Always happy to learn from the community.

 Regards
girinj
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
julcnx (2021-08-07 15:51:11+00:00): Please refrain from adding long service road based on imagery satellite without local knowledge. From satellite view, road main purpose is access to agricultural fields.
kan_dala (2021-08-30 12:12:37+00:00): Hi Cmoffroads,

Thanks for flagging and making the changes. We have added a service road as it was leading to the rooftops, refer to way 964265072.
 
Thank you Happy Mapping
julcnx (2021-08-07 15:54:02+00:00): please refrain from adding geometries without a clear path. In this occurrence, one end has noexit=yes and from satellite, there is no clear line going all the way
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-07-20 11:23:58+00:00): Hey guys! There are three item that have a odd key ```fixme:name:<lang>```, they are https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219614364 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2440289063 , and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7185830521

Using taginfo I only found 3 item have this tag, so I guess if they have a better way to describe.

Wish all the best！
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
user_5359 (2021-07-15 08:37:48+00:00): Hallo! Könntest Du Dir bitte den Wiki Artikel zu den Schlüssel wikipedia durchlesen und statt wikipedia:de="Text" zu wikipedia=de:Text wechseln? Danke!
HWRu (2021-07-16 16:49:15+00:00): erledigt! Danke für den Hinweis.
Lee Carré (2021-07-18 16:42:46+00:00): @trial

You already know exactly what I'm gonna say about the size of the bounding box, here 😉. Plus, the crystal-clear changeset comment, too 😁.
trial (2021-07-18 16:58:49+00:00): Indeed. I was fixing some naming errors found by Osmose (on telecom:medium=fibre, what else? ;-)), and I forgot to uncheck "reuse changeset". Yes the default value is stupid!
Lee Carré (2021-09-19 00:31:21+00:00): “forgot to uncheck "reuse changeset". Yes the default value is stupid!”

Sounds like this “Osmose Editor” needs a bug report filed against it. Does sound like a bit of a daft default.

Makes me more glad that Vespucci has sane defaults.
trial (2021-09-19 12:40:47+00:00): The bug report exists: https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-frontend/issues/142, got recently a big changeset made by Osmoqe, saw you got the notification too. Probably the reason why you added a comment to this changeset ;-)
Lee Carré (2021-09-19 16:11:19+00:00): Good to know re existing issue report. Thanks for the pointer to it; subscribed to notifications 🙂.

Yup, the bounding box just includes my jurisdiction. Yet another changeset adding to the overwhelming noise in the list of changesets when checking local activity.

See for yourself; zoom into Jersey, and then have the Web-UI display changesets within that viewport bounding-box. Most of them will be entirely irrelevant to the island (the noise exceeds the signal), and the majority of irrelevant ones are giant continent-spanning changesets. Sigh.

I'd mind less if they did actually make local changes, but they don't. Plus, in trying to use tools (like OSMCha) to filter out the noise, it ends of excluding the rare ones which are huge but do make local changes. So, lose-lose; screwed either way.

It really doesn't help when software itself contributes to the problem, not just newbies or carelessness.

Alas.
Lee Carré (2021-09-19 16:13:40+00:00): Also only noticed today that I took about 2 months to reply in this discussion. Sorry about that; recently started going through changesets which I commented on, for replies I missed. So wasn't aware until yesterday.

Got there eventually, though.
Lee Carré (2021-09-19 16:36:15+00:00): “big changeset […], saw you got the notification too. Probably the reason why you added a comment to this changeset 😉”

That, actually, is exactly what prompts me to comment on such changesets; because they appear in the list when viewing my island (yes, mine; I'm as local as it gets).

Ideally I'd comment on all of them, but I don't check daily. So some are missed.

This seems to be sensible in a few ways;
▪︎only the problem ones get negative attention (and often not just from me)
▪︎when problem changesets cease appearing in my ‘local’ list, then I'll have none to complain about in terms of irrelevancy (spanning my island without making any local changes)

Thus, it's self-selecting & self-limiting. When the problem goes away, so too will my nagging (for those making huge changesets; can't make any promises about non-locals making a mess of Jersey's data 😋).

For all the griping which some folks do (whining about failure to use non-existent filtering tools, saying that nagging newbies is fruitless) there have been enough times when attentive & responsive newbies have actually thanked me or others for pointing out the problem, and vowed to avoid it in future (and I've not seen any more changesets by them in my local list, since). So, the effect is non-zero.

Funny how the ‘use better tools’ crowd have the time to argue, but not to work on said better tools.

Anyway, enough ranting from me, for today 🙂.

I'll look forward to issue #142 being closed as fixed / resolved.
flohoff (2021-07-15 15:20:02+00:00): Hi,
just curious - Where does the access=private come from? Is there signage or physical barriers which prohibit from entering?

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107973670
borramou (2021-07-19 07:14:59+00:00): Hi flohoff, 

I have added the private access as the landuse and aerial view of the entity is a residential entity. Please feel free to improve in case of any updated information or let me know, I will make the changes. 

Regards,
borramou
flohoff (2021-07-19 12:32:53+00:00): Hi,
access=* something describes access restrictions either by phyiscal barriers e.g. a gate or some signage prohibiting entry. So unless one of the 2 exists i would abstain from tagging any superflous access restriction.

Flo