piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-07-31 11:39:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random .
Please read the instructions before starting to map
In this project we will only map roads.

Please remember to:

    Use Maxar imagery. This imagery is often more recent and higher quality compared to others on our mapping areas.

    Adjust imagery offset, if any. It may be possible to find already OSM data edited on other satellite imagery, especially Bing, which is an older imagery. Adjusting the satellite imagery offset is good practice.



This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124286247
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:00:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
JJIglesias (2022-08-01 00:23:04+00:00): Excelente ese cambio. Los Centros de Salud estan probremente localizados en el Mapa, su ubicacion precisa es de gran ayuda. Te sugiero leer estos dos items en la Wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclinic

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital

Saludos
JJ
clay_c (2022-08-31 00:05:36+00:00): network=US:TX:CTRMA:Express is not documented or supported by any software. Does this route truly have shields that differ from other CTRMA routes?
Trevor_1 (2022-08-31 02:07:32+00:00): Yes, it has "Express" at the top while the other CTRMA routes don't. https://images.app.goo.gl/5aXT5YL9dnTto5b18
clay_c (2022-08-31 12:00:08+00:00): Thanks for the context. Would you mind writing an issue on the Americana Github so we can get these supported? https://github.com/ZeLonewolf/openstreetmap-americana/issues
Trevor_1 (2022-09-01 00:36:17+00:00): Ok I'll do that
NorthCrab (2023-01-02 18:12:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5686764396/history
Czemu ta zmiana jest taka dziwna
mariotomo (2022-07-31 18:58:56+00:00): hola, para ayudarnos a ayudar, podrías considerar de comentar mejor tus conjuntos de cambios? por favor, gracias. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
Warin61 (2022-08-02 06:59:15+00:00): HI,

If you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124286949 and then click on each created way you'll find the ways that cross themselves .. eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1082476612
Warin61 (2022-12-29 04:52:20+00:00): I have now separated way  	1082604070 into 3 ... and these are now separate ways .. they don't cross themselves... 

I note that 'street lamp' should be used on a node ... I have add a discussion point on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dstreet_lamp#Ground_based_lights?
DareDJ (2022-08-02 10:02:34+00:00): Fixed broken relation: '3449346' in following changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124383290
gscholz (2022-08-01 06:00:47+00:00): Hi Santanaloba53,
this changeset has destroyed at least the boundary relation of "Mella" and "Enriquillo":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-71.43054&lat=18.18464&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124287235

Can you please fix this?

My impression of your recent edits is that you really don't not know what you are doing and what destructive consequences your edits have. I suggest to take a brake and start with a tutorial just from the beginning:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
DareDJ (2022-08-02 11:15:31+00:00): Fixed broken relation: '7153751' in following changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124386669
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Danggo Ricebox (2022-07-31 04:49:30+00:00): Noted
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
eggie (2022-07-31 07:10:21+00:00): Dag Pepijn..

Je hebt meerder adresnodes verplaatst.
Dat komt omdat je schuift met de kaart in editmodus. Dus beter niet in zo'n groot gebied de kaart bewerken.
Doe kleine stukjes tegelijk en dus in meerdere uploads.
Dit zijn je edits en kun je zien welke adresnodes zijn verplaatst.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124288485

Is name=Landschapspark  de naam van het park?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-31 07:11:51+00:00): Verder heb je een aantal adresnodes willekeurig samengevoegd.
eggie (2022-07-31 07:26:01+00:00): De adresnodes heb ik allemaal hersteld.
.. Dus svp niet schuiven met de kaart. Het komt omdat je per abuis een adresnode selecteert en dan gaat schuiven. Dan schuift de adresnode ook mee.
De paden in het park heb je omgetagd naar wandelpad (footway) Dat routeert niet meer voor fietsers nu. Is dat de bedoeling?
eggie (2022-07-31 07:28:32+00:00): Mag je niet fietsen langs het Defensiekanaal? Je hebt er een wandelpad van gemaakt. het was een highway=path Dus ook voor fietsers.
eggie (2022-07-31 07:38:33+00:00): Wanneer er geen G7 bord staat is iets een highway=path en geen footway
Een path routeert ook voor fietsers.
Staat er een bord 'Alleen wandelaars' dan voeg je toe vehicle=no.

Mag je er wel fietsen.. Dan voeg je toe bicycle=yes voor de duidelijkheid.
Dus de vraag is mag je er wel of niet fietsen.

Ik heb voorlopig de oude tagging highway=path teruggezet.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-31 07:49:23+00:00): Nog even verder gekeken. Je hebt zoveel aangepast in één changeset.
Dat watervlak was inderdaad geen meadow.. Speeltuintjes hebben in de regel geen naam. Dus daar de naam van verwijderen. 

Laat even weten hoe het met fietsen langs het kanaal zit.. Geen bord.. dan mag je er fietsen. 
Een G7 bord (blauwe bord met de wandelaar met kind)  dan niet.

Mapse
verder
pepijn7 (2022-07-31 22:39:13+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Sorry voor die adresnodes, daar was ik al bang voor, ik zal in de toekomst alleen kleine stukjes tegelijk aanpassen om dat te voorkomen.

Landschapspark is inderdaad de officieele naam van het park, er staan borden van de gemeente bij het park die het zo noemen.
De speelplaatsen hebben geen officieele namen maar zo noemen we ze hier in de buurt, maar het moet dus een officieele naam zijn?

In het landschapspark mogen alleen voetgangers komen, hier staan van die g7 borden. Ik dacht dat dit ook het geval was naast het Defensiekanaal aangezien het een wandelroute is, maar ik ben er vandaag langs gelopen en heb inderdaad geen borden gezien dus fietsen zal wel toegestaan zijn.

De twee natuurgebieden oostelijk van het kanaal zijn wel alleen voor voetgangers, er staan bij de ingangen naar dit gebied geen g7 borden, maar wel bordjes van staatbosbeheer o.i.d., waarop onderandere staat dat fietser en bromfietsers geen toegang hebben. Deze bordjes staan niet bij elke ingang maar het is duidelijk dat het voor het hele gebied telt.

Sorry voor fouten, ik zal proberen in het vervolg kleinere aanpassingen tegelijk te doen.
eggie (2022-08-01 05:01:07+00:00): Dag Pepijn... Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen.. OSM is best ingewikkeld in het begin.
Namen die iedereen gebruikt in de buurt kun je als loc_name invoeren. Dan is het niet de officiele naam.
De paden waar je niet mag fietsen zijn formeel highway=path. .foot=yes.vehicle=no ...
Maar met highway=footway heb ik geen moeite.
Het pad langs het kanaal is dan highway=path foot=yes bicycle=yes voor de duidelijkheid. Dat voorkomt dat iemand er weer een footway van maakt.
Up to you..
Veel plezier met mappen..
Eggie
eggie (2022-10-22 16:34:24+00:00): De Snipweg is geen fietspad.. hoe wonderlijk ook...  Ik heb deze teruggezet naar residential.
Er staat een paaltje bij de brug. het zal dus niet routeren voor auto's
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:00:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Szymson (2022-07-31 12:32:38+00:00): Gratuluję kolejnego wandalizmu i poprowadzenia jezdni po pasie zieleni, brawo.
4004 (2022-07-31 21:53:31+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
а почему это не офисы?
Timur Rossolov (2022-08-04 15:37:20+00:00): Пытался найти специальную отметку для телерадиоцентров, которых в ОСМ нету.
4004 (2022-08-04 16:41:42+00:00): ну, тут зависит, что понимать под этим понятием?
студия - вот https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:studio%3Dtelevision
вышка - вот https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:communication:television
под офис эти здания подходят в любом случае
Glassman (2022-08-02 20:07:59+00:00): #TIP: background imagery usually has different offsets. You can manually adjust the imagery using the background layer in the editor. It possible that the original imagery was also offset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124289529
Glassman (2022-08-02 20:09:21+00:00): #TIP: when adding multiple units, create a node for each individual unit. Place the node near the front door but inside of the building outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124289724
tg4567 (2022-08-13 14:49:08+00:00): I think "File:WK Heckstraße, Aachen-Eilendorf (3).JPG" should be added to the wikimedia_commons tag, not the image tag.
ArthurMcGill (2022-08-14 09:34:54+00:00): Hello,

I don't know where the problem is. I just exchanged an old picture (2019) for a new and better one (2022).

Great, Arthur
legofahrrad (2022-07-31 20:09:21+00:00): Moin!
Die Luftpumpe ist hier schon richtig eingetragen, daher habe ich dein Duplikat wieder entfernt. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9810591699
Viele Grüße!
Porfino (2022-08-04 16:48:24+00:00): Vielen Dank! Habe ich nicht gepeilt. :] Grüße zurück!
dentonny (2022-07-31 07:32:35+00:00): ID-bug:

https://www.geel.be/file/download/17938/856CAC6D7E242EF35C079082768241B0
https://www.geel.be/gemeentewegenregister
felipeeugenio (2022-08-01 18:31:24+00:00): Hola. Sus ediciones son por esas cosas para jugar a alguna app?
Las construcciones se dibujan en su línea base, no se hacen dibujos esquemáticos para rellenar sectores vacíos.
Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124291079
Supaplex (2022-07-31 12:39:49+00:00): 你好，

請問你加的資訊是否為公共場所，如果是個人的資訊，請用 app 的書籤功能，請別上傳上去。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124291278
felipeeugenio (2022-08-01 18:27:15+00:00): Estimado, por favor consultar con la wiki o la comunidad antes de hacer cambios. Voya  tener que reversar esto. todos los cambios son incorrectos. Una cosa es el edificio, otra cosa totalmente distinta esla naturaleza del recinto.
saludos y por favor no dude en escribir para hacer consultas.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124291365
Dino Michelini (2022-08-10 17:48:25+00:00): Ciao ti sei accorto che con la tua modifica fai passare dentro una chiesa una strada residentiale del centro storico?
user_5359 (2022-07-31 15:14:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/13913797. What is  the meaning of the tag ` = yes?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-09-16 01:08:14+00:00): Hey m2ts,

Ik heb de syntax van de openingsuren gefixed.

Je kan trouwens aan de slag met mapcomplete.osm.be/charging_stations als je oplaadpunten wilt mappen.

Mvg,
Pieter
Frans S (2022-09-24 10:33:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested.  A bit late, unfortunately. 
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124293359
Frans S (2022-09-20 11:57:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
your mappings are rather fair but misses the accuracy and are hardly squared. Please square each building with the Q key when it is a rectangular building.
Best regards
silversurfer83 (2022-07-31 19:27:33+00:00): Hi. Du hast ein Review angefordert.
Wenn der Weg wirklich nicht mehr da ist und nicht nur durch ein Tor oder einen Zaun abgesperrt, dann hast du alles richtig gemacht.
Sollte er doch noch da sein, ist löschen nicht die richtige Lösung. Dann wäre ein arbeiten mit "access=private" oder so besser.

-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124293549
Warin61 (2022-08-01 04:03:55+00:00): Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.62079&lat=-34.92119&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Warin61 (2022-08-15 00:37:55+00:00): From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

"multipolygon are used to represent areas (polygons), typically complex areas with holes inside, or consisting of multiple disjoint areas"
CloCkWeRX (2022-08-16 11:07:29+00:00): If you aren't actively surveying on the ground; in this area, don't delete buildings that you can *see in imagery*.

Revert your changeset and correct rather than delete.
Its not that hard to avoid being abrasive.
Warin61 (2022-08-17 08:36:19+00:00): You have made no attempt to fix the error .. and I have in the past done as you suggest by fixing your error .. getting tired of it .. with little to no response for you ... suggest you fix it rather than leave it for others to fix. Thank you. 
You will observe my normal response time ... it can be longer when I'm away, but I do respond especially when I'm mapping.
Warin61 (2022-09-09 12:03:45+00:00): The mapper has expressed views regarding this on an unrelated changeset of mine - Changeset: 124324306. 
I quote
"Combine this with your pattern of remote mapping in an area - again, based on what a validator says are the "rules";"

Not only a validator but also the OSM wiki - both of these quoted above. 

" deleting contibutions, and abrasive commentary... well that's not helping the local map consumers or contributors either."

I have in the past corrected your entries. However we all learn best by correcting our own errors. Your practice of ignoring comments while you continue to map ...  and then expecting corrections to be made by others ... thank you, but no. You are on the ground ... and best placed to detail the building... looks like a roof down the centre? 

In any case ... do not use a multipolygon relation where the outer ways are not disjointed, for reference see the wiki linked above.
jcr83 (2022-08-10 14:21:06+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez attribué le nom de "Ruisseau du Garret" à ce torrent :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162396208
Cela ne correspond pas à la carte IGN TOP25. Pouvez-vous vérifier s'il ne s'agit pas d'un erreur de votre part ? Sinon, quelle est votre source (il arrive que la carte IGN soit fausse) ?
Lulucmy (2022-08-12 19:34:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Je m'excuse, c'était une erreur de ma part. J'ai modifié de nouveau en suivant la BD Carthage : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124831628#map=15/44.2515/6.7521
PT-53 (2022-08-01 05:24:12+00:00): natural=scrub plus landcover=trees:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951667182/history

Ist das so schon gewollt?
user_2066394 (2022-07-31 14:57:28+00:00): Wie lange dauern die Bauarbeiten?
ginnyTheCat (2022-08-01 07:39:07+00:00): Ist leider nicht angegeben
geow (2022-08-02 20:18:26+00:00): Bis 26.08.2022 -> https://www.stephanskirchen.de/einseitige-sperrung-der-rohrdorfer-strasse
geow (2022-08-02 20:27:27+00:00): Unabhängig davon, dass aufgrund der kurzen Bauphase eigentlich keine Änderung nötig/sinnvoll war, würde ich foot=no und bicycle=no in jedem Fall wieder entfernen, da stadtauswärts nicht verboten...
user_2066394 (2022-08-02 20:32:50+00:00): +1 

@ginnyTheCat ggf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions
geow (2022-08-05 14:28:28+00:00): CS habe ich revertiert, einerseits aufgrund fehlerhafter Ausführung (s.o) und andererseits wegen der nur kurzen Dauer von 1 Monat. Für Kfz ist Umleitung beschildert, (Rad schiebende) Fußgänger kommen mit etwas Umsicht und Benutzung der Gehwege auch durch...
PT-53 (2022-07-31 18:08:11+00:00): Willst Du einen Editwar?
Kannst Du haben!
Fizzie-DWG (2022-08-01 02:26:37+00:00): Hi Eggs. Some concern, to say the least, has been raised concerning the mapping you have just done. As far as anyone can tell, this church does not exist! Do you have any form of proof that it is in fact there? Thanks.
alix_geovelo (2023-08-29 15:10:46+00:00): Bonjour
Je me suis permis de mettre à jour le tag construction suite à une note d'un utlisateur très récente, j'espère avoir bien fait ! Si ce n'est pas le cas, n'hésitez pas à me prévenir.
Alix de Geovelo
Nzau (2023-08-29 15:16:00+00:00): Merci Alix,

Tu as bien fait mais j'aimerais bien retourner dans le secteur pour y faire des images !

Bonne fin de journée et merci.
Carto'Cité (2022-12-13 11:47:51+00:00): Salut Nzau,
J'ai vu que tu avais mis bicycle=no sur ce chemin :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385504430
Je voulais voir avec toi si c'est une interdiction réelle ou simplement que c'est très peu cyclable. Si c'est le deuxième cas il ne faut pas mettre le =no mais plutôt ajouter des tags qui montrent bien que c'est peu cyclable (surfce, width, etc.)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Nzau (2022-12-13 14:00:21+00:00): En effet c'est plutôt que c'est compliqué d'y accéder en vélo il faudrait également que j'y retourne je vais enlever le bicycle=no.
Merci !
Carto'Cité (2022-12-13 14:19:22+00:00): Ok merci. J'ai enlevé le bicycle=yes qui porte à confusion mais le surface=dirt est déjà une bonne indication pour comprendre qu'il ne s'agit que d'un simple chemin.
Charles
Nzau (2022-12-14 20:33:10+00:00): Parfait merci
BCNorwich (2022-07-31 12:18:19+00:00): Hi, This looks very much like advertising. The point lacks in that it is situated in the street rather than at/in a building. The tags are far from OSM practice. The website and phone pertain to the agency not the premises. 
Thus I've removed the node.

Regards Bernard.
Jeremyj11 (2024-03-01 03:35:31+00:00): this place has closed / no longer exists
lyjjimmy (2022-08-01 03:09:23+00:00): Hi there, could you provide any prove on the new roads that you create actually exist? - JL
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124295896
DD1GJ (2022-07-31 11:43:38+00:00): revert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436231757
DD1GJ (2022-07-31 11:59:21+00:00): War falscher Link, richtig: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124299840
nevw (2022-08-01 00:45:03+00:00): Hi
the new roads you have added seem fictitious to me.
Could you explain your intent and give more information about the new ways you have added, thanks.
RicoElectrico (2022-08-02 15:45:45+00:00): Nazwa obiektu? Dane kontaktowe?
SzymonH (2022-08-28 20:12:41+00:00): Skąd Ci się wzięła częstotliwość napięcia w sieci trakcyjnej 20Hz? Parametr frequency właśnie za to odpowiada ;)
msor (2022-08-31 18:20:14+00:00): Ah słusznie, myślałem że chodzi o częstotliwość kursowania, bo chyba gdzieś obok też tak było zaznaczone.
DaveF (2022-07-31 13:31:44+00:00): No it isn't.
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.3952634,-2.3560358,3a,75y,187.35h,52.13t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5EyCl02FryOm5mrAc2KkqA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
MichaelMaggs (2022-07-31 13:59:42+00:00): Hi Dave, I believe my edit was correct. The Street View you linked to shows the Northernmost of the two parallel cul-de-sacs called Claremont Walk facing West, with houses on the right, and also on the right a driveway with garages towards the end.

The path is on the left, behind a metal fence and immediately next to a tall hedge. It departs from the left hand pavement approximately opposite the third of the terraced houses on the other side of the road, and doesn't go all the way up to Claremont Buildings/George's Road. The line of the path can (just) be seen in Google satellite view.  

The Southernmost cul-de-sac doesn't have Street View,  but that runs along the far (Southern) side of the hedge from the line of the path.

Perhaps this is trivial, but a walker looking for the path can't expect to find an entrance to it in Claremont Buildings/George's Road. You have to walk down the Northern cul-de-sac to see it.
DaveF (2022-07-31 15:22:04+00:00): There is a high kerb from the end of the fence to Claremont Blds, a clearly defined barrier.
The drop kerb is at the junction of Claremont Blds

You've erroneously attached the fence to Claremont Walk and detached the Western end of the path from the steps.

I walk these paths regularly.
MichaelMaggs (2022-07-31 16:56:25+00:00): On both occasions I walked the path, a few years apart, the map misled me into heading West down the Southermost cul de sac.  The way you have it now is at the very least highly misleading, but if you think there’s no way to improve it I’ll leave it to your far greater mapping experience.
DaveF (2022-07-31 20:20:19+00:00): Which map?