piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
adrianojbr (2016-12-14 22:40:22+00:00): em conversa privado com o mapeador, concordamos em refazer as edições, o que fiz nesse changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44269248.
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:39:13+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:39:04+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
Polarbear (2017-08-22 20:44:42+00:00): Edeka-Märkte haben Eigennamen, die stehen auch draussen gross dran. 
Warum hast du bei "Edeka Kelz" das "Kelz" entfernt?
kreuzschnabel (2018-05-30 04:47:59+00:00): http://osm.org/way/305571390 is kind of a boardwalk adjacent to the street but not connected to it. I think it’s OK to be mapped as a separate way.
kayle (2016-12-05 05:45:36+00:00): Ahoj, len jedna poznámka. Je zvykom do name dávať vlastný názov objektu (ak existuje) a nie všeobecný.
A jedna otázka, sú dva novinové stánky vedľa seba? Najskôr bol upravovaný ten na chodníku a potom vytvorený tento nový bod.
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:38:41+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:39:43+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:39:34+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:39:20+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
user_5359 (2016-12-04 05:30:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have reverted your chnageset because you move a street crossing over other streets (picture exists).

Please try it again to add your information und ask for help if you have trouble!
EIjas (2016-12-04 19:27:51+00:00): Добрый день!

Что значит этот сдвиг точек* Реку Сестру вернул на место, но другое тоже выглядит странно.
luiswoo (2016-12-04 00:25:07+00:00): в этом здании компаний больше чем одна, их нужно отмечать точками.
Tubes (2018-09-28 15:36:03+00:00): What a shame: This is global vandalism, unreverted since 2 years.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-15 17:59:28+00:00): @Tubes: this changeset was not vandalism at all, these were valid additions of a new user. 
You maliciously deleted the features instead of refining them, and used the 'revert' as an excuse to maliciously delete more features and mechanically editing others.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-15 18:00:33+00:00): DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:39:55+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
yxoc (2017-06-25 19:49:07+00:00): Bonsoir, merci pour avoir réalisé les trottoirs sur les Champs d'Elysee ! Je me permet de vous indiquer une erreur que j'ai deja fait moi-meme dans le passé, et qui a la facheuse consequence de faire disparaitre tout un ilot du rendu : il ne faut pas mettre les tags highway=?, area=yes etc sur le way qui est la limite exterieure, mais seulement sur la relation multipolygone !

Cordialement -Ralf
Marco_T (2016-12-03 22:41:53+00:00): Scusa Andrea, sembra che hai modificato la mappa ad-hoc per un evento agonistico. La mappa viene mantenuta per fini di uso generale e non personale, neppure temporaneo. Inoltre hai sovrapposto sentieri a strade, duplicato percorsi....non mi sembra una buona mappatura. Osservazione fatta con spirito costruttivo eh..non prendertela.
jaap de vries (2016-12-13 08:35:26+00:00): wil je de postcode even veranderen in de juiste wijze ZONDER SPATIE.
jaap de vries (2016-12-13 08:41:20+00:00): wil je de postcode even veranderen in de juiste wijze zonder SPATIE dus.
highflyer74 (2016-12-05 13:56:31+00:00): Hallo!

Ich bin durch einen Tippfehler im Tagging auf diesen Changeset aufmerksam geworden. Insgesamt sind in diesem Bereich drei Blitzer gemappt worden. Sind es wirklich so viele? Normalerweise werden diese als Relation erfasst (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement). Bitte passe das Mapping entsprechend an. 

Danke!
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:40:12+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
m137 (2016-12-03 21:57:12+00:00): دبیرستان استعداد درخشان
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:40:04+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
Rodrigo Rega (2016-12-04 00:03:30+00:00): En este conjunto de cambios has cambiado etiquetas name que estaban en gallego a castellano. Siento comunicarte que esto es un error. Te pongo un ejemplo de como deberían etiquetarse correctamente los nombres:

name=O nome do lugar
name:gl=O nome do lugar
name:es=El nombre del lugar
sorting_name=Nome do lugar, O 

Como ves se ha de repetir el nombre tanto en la etiqueta name como en name:gl. En la wiki [1] puedes consultar más detalles de como se etiquetan los nombres.

Voy a proceder a revertir este conjunto de cambios. Espero que esto no te desanime a seguir traduciendo nombres, ya que es una información muy valiosa.

Gracias por tu trabajo, un saludo. 

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Ubicaciones
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-25 11:38:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246039927/history - czy ta droga ma nadaną nazwę "Piaski "Do Kasprzaka""?

Jak nie - to skąd ona się wzięła?
waldhans (2016-12-03 22:05:40+00:00): es ist gut genug, den Gehsteig als Attribut der Strasse zu mappen:  sidewalk=both/left/right/no;
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:40:22+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
waldhans (2016-12-03 21:59:32+00:00): ist da wirklich Fahrrad verboten? Glaube ich nicht!
highflyer74 (2016-12-05 13:56:05+00:00): Hallo!

Ich bin durch einen Tippfehler im Tagging auf diesen Changeset aufmerksam geworden. Insgesamt sind in diesem Bereich drei Blitzer gemappt worden. Sind es wirklich so viele? Normalerweise werden diese als Relation erfasst (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement). Bitte passe das Mapping entsprechend an. 

Danke!
dooley (2016-12-06 12:34:28+00:00): Hallo meridianeum,

bist du sicher, dass die Postleitzahl korrekt ist? Lt. OSM-eigenen PLZ-Grenzen befindet sich das Freizeitheim innerhalb der PLZ 71735 > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3378017#map=15/48.8685/8.9628 

Gruß, dooley
dooley (2016-12-06 12:37:36+00:00): Upps, grad gefunden, daher Nachtrag: Steht so auch auf der Website http://www.eberdingen.blackstar.de/index.php/kontakt (runterscrollen bis "Hausadresse")
aequator (2016-12-06 13:50:06+00:00): Hallo Dooley, 
tatsächlich ist es nicht ganz so einfach. Auf DER Website steht »Badweg 20«. Stimmiger ist allerdings »Weissacher Berg 1«, wie es hier steht: http://www.blackstar.de/Eberdingen/Site/kontakt.html
Viele Grüße
Carsten
dooley (2016-12-06 14:02:40+00:00): Hallo Carsten,

auf beiden Seiten ist als PLZ 71735 vermerkt. Das würde auch mit den OSM-eigenen PLZ-Grenzen übereinstimmen.  Du hast 71725 eingetragen. Tippfehler?

Grüße, Frank


Zum Straßennamen kann ich nix sagen ;-)
aequator (2016-12-06 15:04:23+00:00): Hallo Frank, 
Danke, 71735 ist richtig; hatte mich tatsächlich vertippt. 
Viele Grüße
Carsten
highflyer74 (2016-12-05 13:54:15+00:00): Hallo!

Ich bin durch einen Tippfehler im Tagging auf diesen Changeset aufmerksam geworden. Insgesamt sind in diesem Bereich drei Blitzer gemappt worden. Sind es wirklich so viele? Normalerweise werden diese als Relation erfasst (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:enforcement). Bitte passe das Mapping entsprechend an.

Danke!
skyper (2016-12-18 17:02:56+00:00): Keine Gebäude verändert, sonder Bäume ergänzt
skyper (2016-12-18 17:02:22+00:00): Keine Gebäude verändert.
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 11:16:51+00:00): Hallo John,
Je bent momenteel druk bezig met allerlei toevoegingen aan de OSM database, maar omdat je maps.me gebruikt gaat daar nogal eens wat fout.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

En lees ook zeker deze discussie:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=55534
skyper (2016-12-18 17:01:29+00:00): Keine Gebäude verändert !
user_5359 (2016-12-04 05:40:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. I have revert your changeset.
maraf24 (2016-12-04 10:47:46+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:40:35+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:40:44+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
praeteritum (2024-01-17 11:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146360239.
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:41:02+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
Bonix-Mapper (2017-12-01 01:36:30+00:00): Olá Zalitoar,

Não lembro se havia deixado o Edifício Itália na minha importação.

Gostaria de alterar a forma como os POIs foram inseridos.

Ao invés de adicioná-los a geometria da edificação incluir pontos para separar uma coisa da outra.

Se possível entre no grupo do telegram que usamos para discutir as alterações de São Paulo:

https://t.me/osmsp

Também temos um grupo mais geral para discutir diversas dúvidas:

https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte

Aguardo seu retorno.
Bonix-Mapper (2017-12-01 01:44:55+00:00): Correção: Não lembro como tinha deixado...

Acredito que o melhor é separar a geometria da edificação do POI sempre que possível. Principalmente em se tratando de uma edificação complexa e que pode conter diversos POIs nela.
Zalitoar (2017-12-08 15:59:48+00:00): Hola Bonix-Mapper!
Mi nombre es Gonzalo, soy de Buenos Aires. Disculpame que no escriba en portugués, por favor. Coincido con la idea de pasar los POIs o PDIs a nodos independientes, si querés seguimos hablando de esto en alguno de los canales de chat que me enviaste por acá.
Bonix-Mapper (2017-12-11 00:31:38+00:00): Hola,

Si usted mismo puede hacer el cambio, le agradezco.

Cuando es una cuestión sobre la forma de editar, busco primero conversar con el asignador original. El objetivo es llegar a un acuerdo.

Gracias por responder y disculpe el G traductor.
Zalitoar (2017-12-11 19:51:41+00:00): Bonix-Mapper, por favor, reveja a seguinte changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54548849
Teiron (2016-12-04 18:53:13+00:00): Witaj!

Prace (w sensie fizycznym w terenie) jeszcze sie nie zaczęły więc linie powinny mieć wartości: highway=proposed i zamiast klucza construction powinny mieć klucz proposed
Perimex (2016-12-05 01:00:31+00:00): Oznaczenie tymczasowe dla postu w w www.rynekInfrastruktury.pl, za około tydzień wykonam korektę do układu proposed
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:41:10+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
Commodoortje (2017-04-02 08:28:42+00:00): Per ongeluk heb je hier de weg onderbroken, routering is hier niet meer mogelijk door een route app gebaseerd op OSM data.
Mocht je niet weten hoe je dit kan oplossen geef dan een reactie op deze changeset.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/42736232
vussiewussie (2017-04-02 21:15:54+00:00): Kun je me even op weg helpen welk probleem er precies in welke weg zit want ik zie het niet?
Commodoortje (2017-04-03 22:14:53+00:00): In onderstaand plaatje kan ik het laten zien. https://www.dropbox.com/s/il7af8tlroy2xvb/2017-04-04_00-01-09.jpg?raw=1
Je ziet dat de 2 nodes aan de noordzijde niet met elkaar zijn verbonden. 
Ik heb het inmiddels voor je opgelost.
.
Ik werk zelf niet met ID, dus weet niet welke oplossing daar werkt.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:ID/Shortcuts
Ik zou je daarom het advies willen geven om na te denken om over te stappen naar JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
Commodoortje (2017-04-03 22:18:35+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47426575
alphensebezorger (2017-04-04 19:03:21+00:00): Volgens mij is de onderbreking van de rotonde niet in deze wijzigingenset ontstaan. (58176704, v4 en 350012362, v2 hebben allebei het betreffende punt als eindpunt.) Zou het kunnen dat de discussie bij een verkeerde wijzigingenset is gestart?
Commodoortje (2017-04-04 23:01:56+00:00): Inderdaad alphensebezorger, bedankt voor je interventie.
Hierbij mijn excuus naar vussiewussie.
De changeset waar het veroorzaakt is, is 47330212
.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/uheq6g0c9ko71lb/2017-04-05_01-00-37.jpg?raw=1
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:16:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 40786262, 43481235, 43547729, 43555459, 43559131, 43563430, 43742392, 43782824, 43785137, 43808513, 43823742, 43834776, 43897542, 43933100, 43933348, 43959804, 43960691, 43960872, 43960975, 43961030, 43961357, 43961424, 43961431, 43964692, 43964798, 43964876, 43965318, 43965431, 43977371, 44003156, 44004659, 44010671, 44010734, 44010961, 44011610, 44012408, 44012757, 44025559, 44025783, 44047780, 44065715, 44066072, 44067110, 44067476, 44067704, 44070529, 44070690, 44070779, 44071123, 44071222, 44071261, 44071760, 44071829, 44072112, 44072600, 44078397, 44115256, 44115677, 44115823, 44115872, 44115969, 44116089, 44116612, 44116803.
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:41:18+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
muesli13 (2016-12-03 22:20:43+00:00): Sorry, changedescription should be:
added new path and changed from bushland to park.
Warin61 (2017-05-06 23:25:49+00:00): relation  	6760414 residential .. shares a segment. I have removed the shared segment, combined the two remaining ways - thus making a simple single way .. and now deleted the relation! 
Try to keep things simple?
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footprint imports. Please adhere to import guidelines, and discuss BEFORE you import.
Osm1980 (2016-12-07 19:20:52+00:00): in tag gozaritoon eshtebahe:name 	نیلوفر - شهید قندی
MiroJanosik (2016-12-05 12:38:04+00:00): Ahoj, no nebol to najlepsi pokus. Vytvoril si polygon bez vlastnosti, ktory sa trochu prekryva s industrialnou zonou. Co si chcel vytvorit? Pomozem ti s tym.
MiroJanosik (2016-12-08 14:02:45+00:00): Nikto sa mi neozval, cestu som odstranil.
user_5359 (2016-12-04 05:56:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

I have changed this.
AaronAsAChimp (2017-01-19 19:19:32+00:00): In this changeset you changed a number of footways (sidewalks) to pedestrian streets. Specifically along Woodward near 9 Mile. Was this intended?
Konkon153 (2025-01-23 12:41:19+00:00): Hallo frink,
ich möchte kurz erfragen, wo damals die Information hergenommen wurde, dass im Straßennamen ein Tippfehler existierte (ich nehme an hierbei ging es um ...dieck/diek mit c oder ohne)
Freundliche Grüße
frink (2025-01-23 20:30:03+00:00): Hallo Konkon153,
die Änderung erfolgte auf Basis von https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/800465 mit zusätzlicher Prüfung der Anschriften der Anlieger.
Viele Grüße
Konkon153 (2025-02-17 08:43:43+00:00): Hallo frink,
danke für die Rückmeldung.
Nach längerem hin und her, hat das Amt Neuburg nun doch die Schreibweise ohne c bestätigt
ToniE (2016-12-04 14:05:57+00:00): Servus heilbron,

das ist tatsächlich eine 50 km/h Straße. Ich war am 17.11. dort und habe ein Foto mit dem entspr. Schild "30 Zone Ende" an dieser Position:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=48.12962&mlon=11.51884#map=19/48.12962/11.51884

Viele Grüße
Toni
heilbron (2016-12-05 20:08:36+00:00): Ich hätte schwören können (aus der Erinnerung) sowie aus den Aufzeichnungen eines Spaziergangs, dass auf der Siegenburger Straße in Richtung NW zwischen Breitacher Straße und Rüdesheimer Straße eine 30er-Zone beginnt.... Ich schaus mir vor Ort mal wieder an. VG! heilbron
ToniE (2016-12-05 20:59:09+00:00): Hi, das weiß ich auch nicht so genau, aber die Rüdesheimer Straße in diesemAusschnitt hier gehört nicht zur 30er-Zone.

Viele Grüße
Toni
skyper (2016-12-18 16:59:26+00:00): Das waren doch Bäume und keine Gebäude, wie im Änderungssatzkommentar angegeben.
blackadder (2017-07-16 21:30:30+00:00): I reverted this changeset as the road layout at Chester Way / Station Road has been changed. I had already updated it following a survey. The layout is much changed from BING
praeteritum (2024-01-16 12:12:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146321336.
carciofo (2017-01-06 14:53:05+00:00): Hi & thanks for your upload. In future, please take care to check beforehand if roads don't already exist before uploading GPX tracks in order to avoid duplicated/overlapping roads. Thanks.
user_5359 (2016-12-04 06:06:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is the name of the office Keler or Keller Williams Realty?
Hjart (2016-12-04 10:48:15+00:00): Måske det kunne være interessant for dig at køre http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kso en gang imellem?
Supaplex (2016-12-04 03:42:47+00:00): 原來一直標錯位置
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 20:16:41+00:00): Het adres van de kerk stond al op de zogenaamde adresnode. Die is zichtbaar op de kaart. Het is zinloos om dat nog een keer toe te voegen.
Ook de name:nl tag is overbodig, name=* is voldoende (maps.me fout).
Maps.me is een heel slechte editor voor dit soort details.
Ik heb de overbodige zaken verwijderd.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
raito (2016-12-04 09:57:26+00:00): correct description:
added roads and a building..
ToeBee (2018-01-19 05:21:17+00:00): Do you happen to remember details about this changeset? You mapped several barrier=gate objects like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4537155778 

Someone from that area contacted the Data Working Group complaining that their  Garmin was refusing to route through these gates. This person seemed to indicate that they were cattle grids, not gates. Of course their Garmin BaseCamp is also showing them as bollards, while mine just says "Land feature" so I'm still not entirely sure what is going on. But if they are actual gates along a road that is open to the public, they should probably have an access tag on them to indicate that routing software can go through them. Thoughts?
cleary (2018-01-19 07:37:28+00:00): There was definitely a gate when I went through there in approx December 2016. There were also quite a few gates on Joulnie Road and Sanpah Road and the northern section of Border Downs Road. It is not unusual to have gates on public roads in remote areas. Often local councils will construct cattle grids at property boundaries to replace gates but gates persist especially in the Unincorporated Area where there are no ratepayers to subsidise grid construction and the farmers prefer gates to discourage travellers. There were also gates on Waterbag Road which carries more traffic. Some routing software may avoid gates and an access tag could be added if it would assist routing. Personally I drive a road with gates once, out of interest, but am generally happy to avoid the gates if I can. There are many more gates on public roads in Queensland. So it is not a rare occurrence.
ToeBee (2018-01-19 20:02:54+00:00): So here's a neat trick. See this route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=-30.935%2C141.256%3B-30.916%2C141.249

Then switch from "Car (OSRM)" to "Car (GraphHopper)". Obviously different routing algorithms handle gates differently. And I also figured out some odd behavior in BaseCamp last night. That same trip will follow the GraphHopper route. But if you set the destination further north to where it MUST go through a gate because there is no other way, then it will suddenly be happy to route through ALL gates along the way and will take the OSRM path.

Anyway, thanks for the information. I'm still waiting on a response back from the person who complained about it to see if some of these gates have been converted to cattle grids or if an explicit access tag should be added. Considering the differences between routers, an explicit access tag is probably a good idea, regardless.
cleary (2018-01-20 04:57:31+00:00): I have now added access=yes tags to gates on public roads in this area (at least to those with which I am familiar).
TheSwavu (2018-01-22 03:39:07+00:00): I'd be more worried about the kind of person that would be driving around this part of NSW following a route provided by their GPS rather than knowing where they are going.
adrianojbr (2016-12-06 00:41:00+00:00): olüa, victor. que fonte você está usando para corrigir o sentido das vias em itapema?

há pouco tempo, eu corrigi várias vias com base em notícia publicada no site da prefeitura, conforme esse changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40845694
adrianojbr (2016-12-14 22:41:11+00:00): em conversa privada com o mapeador, concordamos em refazer as edições. o que fiz nesse https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44269248
maxerickson (2018-01-22 01:14:58+00:00): The boundary improvements here left hundreds of unconnected nodes, as if buildings were supposed to be uploaded but just the corners made it.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footprint imports. Please adhere to import guidelines, and discuss BEFORE you import.
Glassman (2016-12-04 06:08:22+00:00): I added tags to your two business so they will render and help search engines find the businesses.
user_5359 (2016-12-04 10:07:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I can’t see any park on the building (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark)
Supaplex (2016-12-04 08:42:51+00:00): amenity=cafe
Tomas Straupis (2016-12-04 12:18:05+00:00): CRAP.ME trash change reverted
ivanbranco (2021-12-19 19:37:42+00:00): Hi Papayaved,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/245649314

what's the meaning of place=no_village?
Papayaved (2021-12-20 06:16:02+00:00): I think, I did not want to delete object from the map but I did not find a correct location of this village
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:17:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
trigpoint (2016-12-04 10:14:16+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edit however when reversing ways it is good to also look at the other tags on the way you are reversing. This is particulary important when the way forms a boundary. We now have Wales on the left of this stream and England on the right. That is not right.
Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2016-12-04 14:12:31+00:00): In this case the tags are obsolete as they are defined as relations but when reversing way please to look at the tags to ensure they still make sense.
Cheers Phil
Bman (2016-12-05 15:47:50+00:00): @trigpoint - oops. Sorry. Thank you for cleaning that up after me.