piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Skippern (2015-01-27 15:06:01+00:00): Bom dia, e bem vindo ao OSM. Feliz ver que tem mais gente que interessa ao melhorar nosso mapa.

Sou um voluntario que monitorando edições no Espírito Santo.

Infelizmente não vejo seu contribuição util. O nó que você coloquei não tem informação que pode ser verificado além de ser localizado errado.

Nós deve ter um atributo explicando o que e, no este caso, isso e um loja, bar, restaurante, escritório, oficina, casa?

Este informação deveria ser colocado com os etiquetes certas dentro a casa certo, que ja tem no mapa no ambos lados da rua. Se contorno da casa e errado, concerta-lo.

Se voce tem conhecimento no local pode também ajuda ligar as escadas com ruas, adicionar trilhas onde tem, ou muito mais

Grato
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-02 02:39:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 30706685, 30705742, 30707787, 30707005, 30706320, 30708240, 30708754, 30707415 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
kreuzschnabel (2018-10-24 17:29:11+00:00): Hallo Elofos, es ist schon ein paar Jahre her, aber wo bitte hast du das minspeed=60 her? Davon ist nichts beschildert, und die Kraftfahrstraße verlangt (ebenso wie eine Autobahn) lediglich, dass die Fahrzeuge darauf 60 km/h fahren *können* müssen, das heißt aber nicht, dass man nicht langsamer fahren darf. Ich nehm das mal da raus.
 
Davon abgesehen stehen foot=no / bicycle=no / horse=no schon in den Defaults für Kraftfahrstraßen, da ist es überflüssig, das noch mal einzeln dranzutaggen :)
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-02 02:39:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 30706685, 30705742, 30707787, 30707005, 30706320, 30708240, 30708754, 30707415 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
salix01 (2015-01-28 05:57:42+00:00): Hallo,
sind die ways 24484230 und 267748946 versehentlich gelöscht worden? Dann könnte ich sie wieder nachtragen.
Viele Grüße
Olaf
letihu (2016-12-02 20:57:13+00:00): Die Straße hat maxspeed 100 und hier ist ein 30-Schild getagt. Ein Wert kann nur richtig sein ;-)
SomeoneElse (2015-02-05 19:27:20+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I notice that you've added a couple of roads - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324771788 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324771670 .  However, these did already exist, so there are now two "old Park Road" and two "Old Park Avenue".  Would you like me to delete the duplicates?
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-02 02:39:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 30706685, 30705742, 30707787, 30707005, 30706320, 30708240, 30708754, 30707415 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Jojo4u (2015-02-02 16:15:04+00:00): Hello H-GT,
why should way 319482081 be "primary" and have ref "B 239"? Both does not make sense to me since it's clearly a primary_link and it does not belong to the route "B 239".
lubosb (2015-01-30 15:21:33+00:00): Hi Johnny,

in this changeset you have taged all roads as highway=secondary,  but they looks like highway=residential.

Please, take a look on wiki description:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential

Thank you!
GerdP (2015-10-07 11:05:27+00:00): I guess this was meant to add a name
iinstead of setting
highway=Heritage Place ?
I'll change it that way.
Luis36995 (2015-11-16 14:26:08+00:00): You are right it was meant to be a name = Heritage Place
thanks for your correction.
GerdP (2015-11-16 14:45:25+00:00): OK, thanks for your feedback :-)
4rch (2015-02-05 12:02:40+00:00): please do not merge this river. The river is split because it is part of some administrative boundaries which got damaged now.
javiii (2015-01-27 18:22:56+00:00): Caminos de acceso a la colonia
javiii (2015-01-27 18:22:40+00:00): Caminos privados de la colonia
javiii (2015-01-27 18:22:25+00:00): Restaurante y sala de fiestas para eventos
javiii (2015-01-27 18:22:02+00:00): Edificios comerciales
javiii (2015-01-27 18:21:27+00:00): Bar de copas
javiii (2015-01-27 18:21:10+00:00): Bar de copas
javiii (2015-01-27 18:20:55+00:00): Nuevo meson
didier2020 (2015-01-28 19:34:06+00:00): importer des batiments c'est bien, regarder s'il y en a pas déjà c'est mieux ... non ?
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=13&lat=44.0511136942087&lon=4.01982479876925&item=0
Nakaner (2015-05-19 13:42:59+00:00): Why did you add lanes=* to railway track? Don't you know the difference between a road and a pair of rails? AFAIK NS does not use rubber wheels like metro in Paris. :) Please fix this.
James Fahlbusch (2015-01-27 19:15:12+00:00): Added the Area to the Fisherman's Wharf Breakwater (was previously a line). It is a significant structure designed prevent waves from entering the Fisherman's Wharf area
Piotr Kuriata (2015-01-27 19:19:04+00:00): Ulica Moniuszki łączy się z Kozielską.
Hjart (2015-01-29 10:24:08+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at ændre i et par parkeringspladser ved Bryggeri Skovlyst. Dels fordi jeg foretrækker at diverse polygoner holdes adskilt fra vejnettet (highway=*) (jeg retter et meget stort antal fejl rundt omkring, hvilket er meget nemmere på den måde) og dels fordinavigationsprogrammerne ikke betragter amenity=parking som en del af vejnettet
bocaj52 (2015-01-29 19:51:31+00:00): Hej Hjart, 
Det helt ok. jeg var lidt i tvivl angånde navigering om P området skulle ramme vejen for at kunne guide der ind. Men kan se at vejen bliver ledt gennem P området, snedigt.
Jeg fik ikke svaret din første besked angående GPS sporet. Indtil videre har jeg kun brugt sporene som underlæg, via lag. Da sporet typisk fører hjem til mit hus igen, da jeg tracker på løbeture.
mvh. Jacob
Hjart (2015-01-29 20:03:04+00:00): Forstår godt med ikke at bryde sig om at vise alle og enhver hvor man bor :). Jeg uploader selv masser af spor, men klipper altid de dele fra der er for tæt på mit hjem.
bocaj52 (2015-01-30 07:31:57+00:00): Jeg er stadig lidt af novice hvad angår teknikken bag det hele, så det må jeg lige kigge lidt nærmere på..
Hjart (2015-01-29 08:37:02+00:00): Kan du lægge de gps-spor du tegner efter op, så vi andre har mulighed for at vurdere om stierne ligger korrekt?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-26 21:45:10+00:00): Hej!
Ktoś się skarży na brakujący junction=roundabout... http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/387180
Hjart (2015-01-28 10:50:48+00:00): De meste af det her bør vel være path i stedet for residential (villavej)
Henrik PS (2015-01-28 20:18:59+00:00): Det har du ret i. Det er nu justeret
skyper (2015-01-28 17:18:10+00:00): Hey deproHarry

Schön, dass Du Dich um die Freiburger Radweg kümmerst.

Deine Relation der lcn=yes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4525010) ist jedoch eine Sammelrelation und wird in OSM abgelehnt. Dazu gibt es einiges im Forum bzw auf den Mailinglisten.

Das gleichzeitige Löschen von lcn=yes an den Linien ist dabei noch gravierender. Hiermit brichst Du wohl so einige Auswerter.

Bitte setzte Deine Änderungen wieder zurück und diskutiere vor solchen Löschungen mit der community oder zumindest mit ein paar aktiven Mapper_innen in der Gegend.

Danke und Grüße skyper
Firefishy (2015-08-03 21:45:28+00:00): Awesome job mapping Barberton!
Liebe das Rad (2021-09-14 05:49:06+00:00): Privatgelände eines Vereins. Zutritt nicht erlaubt.
MKnight (2016-04-09 10:05:00+00:00): Ohne die Löschungen schönreden zu wollen, aber da is reichlich Mist dabei,
Beispiel:
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=18&lat=53.117221&lon=12.890056&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&item=&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=

Ich bezweifle, dass die Gebäude tatsächlich so aussehen.
MKnight (2016-04-24 08:32:30+00:00): Bin gerade dabei Deinen "Vandalismus" nach Bing und Stichhaltigkeit zu korrigieren"
robert (2015-01-28 01:03:25+00:00): I fixed this a bit for you:
1. opening_hours actually uses a specific syntax http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
2. cuisine isn't really a general description field - I think it's clear enough what most cafe's cuisine is.
3. You managed to create three POIs on top of each other (including one place of worship)

Anyway, a useful addition. Keep mapping.
Wild Bytes Cafe (2015-01-30 01:34:39+00:00): Thank you. I am an enthusiastic young entreprenuer trying to get the word out.
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-28 06:03:22+00:00): I'm curious, but what's your justification for upgrading Constitution to trunk from primary?  PA-65 on the other side of the river is the more important highway in this area (and was already tagged as trunk), and I think it even has a higher speed limit as well than PA-51 here.
Uniplex (2015-01-28 13:00:16+00:00): Hello,
The section of PA 51 which I have upgraded to Trunk contains an area that has a speed limit that is 45 and 55 (between Monaca and South Heights).
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-28 16:51:14+00:00): Speed limit isn't always a reason for upgrading to trunk from primary.  You have to look to see if the segment of trunk you're adding has a logical start/end points.  IMO, this doesn't.  It ends at 2-lane segments on each end.  While it is about 8 miles long, thru traffic is way better served over on PA-65 (hence why it was trunk already and PA-51 was primary).  On PA-65, it is 4 lanes all the way from Pittsburgh to Rochester (PA-51 isn't), is divided practically the entire way (PA-51 only has this small area), and is the preferred thru route here.

We don't want to be confusing routing engines here with 2 trunks on each side of the river, especially when one of them shouldn't be one.

So, I recommend that PA-51 be put back to primary like it was before.  But I also recommend that you add in speed limits where they are missing on PA-51 that you know of so it can help out the routers on having accurate times based off the speed limits.
rickmastfan67 (2015-02-11 02:03:02+00:00): I'm sorry, but I'm reverting the part of this changeset that edited West Carson Street.  It is still one-way inbound to Pittsburgh till the construction project is over. http://www.dot.state.pa.us/penndot/districts/district11.nsf/D11Secondary?OpenFrameset&Frame=main&src=WestCarsonSt?OpenPage
muralito (2015-02-13 00:12:12+00:00): Leonardo:
Si no tiene o no sabes el nombre, dejalo sin nombre, pero no le pongas "Verduleria", eso ya es el shop=greengrocer
muralito (2015-01-29 20:07:56+00:00): Habria que advertirles a los responsables de la vialidad para que eliminen la salida pirata. 

Esto va a saltar como error en los controles de calidad, porque nada se podria conectar a un motorway que no sea un motorway_link. 

¿Confirmaste que esta ahi o mapeaste solo por la foto?
muralito (2015-01-29 20:09:34+00:00): Lo mismo con las que pusiste unos kilometros antes.

¿Al poner eso ahi, no estas de alguna forma promoviendo que se usen esos accesos piratas?
Víctor L (2015-02-05 15:46:33+00:00): Eso habría de decirles a los responsables de la concecionaria (Cincovial).
Creo que importante advertir al conductor (que lleva GPS) que ahí hay una salida que no está señalizada. Estos tipos de salidas (huellas), son usadas por lo general por peones rurales. Lo mismo sucede en varias de estas salidas que hay en el tramos Campana-Rosario, que hay hasta puestos de ventas (que son clandestino obviamente y que muchos accidente ya causaron a causa de los automovilistas que estacionan mal o se detienen repentinamente).
Enviando esto a Cincovial, a lo mejor se ponen las pilas y comienzan a cercar el autopista (como toda carretera de este tipo tiene que tener).
Víctor L (2015-02-05 15:48:48+00:00): Lo mapee por la foto, pero pude corroborar  que está ahí. Viajo frecuentemente a Río Tercero y paso por ahí.
Víctor L (2015-02-05 16:10:42+00:00): Perdón, unas correcciones. Ese tramo pertenece a Caminos de las Sierras y cuando voy a Río Tercero no paso por ahí, sino que lo hago cuando voy a Córdoba Capital.
muralito (2015-02-05 16:52:20+00:00): Entiendo, pero si el acceso no esta permitido legalmente, ¿ no habria que etiquetarlas con "access=no"?
Víctor L (2015-02-05 16:54:43+00:00): Ahh!!! Eso no lo sabía!!!
Víctor L (2015-02-05 16:56:58+00:00): Se me había pasado esa herramienta. Ya está solucionado. Veré las demás (incluso las que coloqué en la autopista Campana Rosario.
muralito (2015-02-05 17:35:46+00:00): Bien! Son cosas impensables en los paises desarrollados, pero de esa manera queda mapeada algo mejor la realidad local, la huella esta en OSM porque existe, y el access=no porque es algo no permitido de usar.
gjermv (2015-02-02 12:17:50+00:00): Hi, I think what you have done here must be wrong. This is in the middle of a residential area, and no shequ or seven eleven here. Maybe it should be somewhere else?
Peter Dobratz (2015-02-05 06:45:11+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  I've been doing a bunch of editing around Hillsdale.  Let me know if you have any questions.
Chris Fleming (2015-01-28 10:59:09+00:00): There is one additional step that needs to be done, and that's removing the tags from the outer, so that just the relation is tagged....
luschi (2015-05-19 20:36:38+00:00): Anhand deiner letzten Änderungen sehe ich, dass du layer=-1 bei Bäche wieder rückgängig gemacht hast. In Südtirol sind leider noch etliche deiner layer=-1 vorhanden.
Viele konnte ich schon ändern. Bitte sieh doch hier noch mal nach, da du am besten weißt wo du überall layer=-1 gesetzt hast.
lg
dieterdreist (2016-01-18 11:43:21+00:00): the comment for this changeset is not sufficiently explicit and does not tell anything about what was done, why it was done. See here for help how to make your changeset comments more useful: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
user_599436 (2015-04-05 19:57:34+00:00): May I ask what source was used to verify this edit?
andygol (2015-04-05 21:28:48+00:00): @zeromap, thanks for your attention about this issue. I made changes concerning it.  You may look at them in changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30001584. I drew roughly the park boundary. If you have an accurate information of the boundaries of the park, could you fix it?
Best regards, andygol.
user_599436 (2015-04-05 21:33:32+00:00): Thanks for your recent edits. But what source did you use for the name of the park?
andygol (2015-04-05 21:36:01+00:00): Name was taken from here - https://cicero.recdesk.com/recdeskportal/FacilitiesReservations/SkywayPark/tabid/4011/Default.aspx
user_599436 (2015-04-05 22:13:48+00:00): Thanks again. If you would like to comment further, please do so here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/zeromap/diary/34691
Nakaner (2015-04-06 18:57:23+00:00): Could you please make https://github.com/mapbox/map-feedback/issues/315 public? Or has OSM become a private project?
lxbarth (2015-04-07 14:49:21+00:00): The link you're referencing ( https://github.com/mapbox/map-feedback/issues/315 ) was posted mistakenly. It clearly doesn't make sense to share links that can't be accessed by the public.

Feedback on maps appears as a submission form - see here: https://www.mapbox.com/blog/map-feedback/

With such a submission form comes an expectation of privacy that I want to take very, very seriously. For instance, some users submit personally identifiable information, such as their name together with their address. Some feedback is about the app the map is embedded in, or map design rather than OpenStreetMap data.

This is why as a general policy we don't open the feedback note directly to the public - but we're trying to write an as descriptive changeset comment as possible.

It is tempting to change this policy at least for feedback we can "safely deem to be appropriate to publish" and which is applicable to OpenStreetMap. We've started collecting map feedback more systematically just in the beginning of this year. I'd like to get a better sense of what feedback we're receiving before deciding whether or not to adjust this publication policy.
wwhide (2015-01-28 08:53:12+00:00): Note: the hiking trail is accurate on 4 gpx passes and some of the aerials, Bing aerial is stretched out on the west end causing aerial and osm to not match visually.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
Warin61 (2016-07-04 23:28:43+00:00): Hi
Way: 324958533 looks like sport=soccer to me rather than sport=soccer?
fischhonig (2015-03-28 08:50:43+00:00): Beim Neuanlegen von diesem Weg hast du die Wanderwegrelation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3654395 unterbrochen, bitte zukünftig etwas mehr Sorgfalt ;)
Durko_freemap (2015-01-28 11:42:21+00:00): Zdravim chochmo, vdaka za aktualizaciu mapy, potrebujem Vas vsak upozornit na to, ze ulica Polna nebola zviazana s tou nepomenovanou ulicou, poprosim Vas pre buducnost o doslednejsie nadvazovanie. Uvedenu vec som opravil.
Nakaner (2015-02-01 21:13:23+00:00): Läuft dazu schon das Planfeststellungsverfahren? Ansonsten empfinde ich das als sehr früh, um es in OSM einzutragen.
GarryX3D (2015-02-02 21:33:39+00:00): Es ist eine Planung und ich sehe keinen Grund warum sie nicht als solche eingetragen werden sollte. Jeder sollte die Möglichkeit habe zu sehen wo etwas (ernsthaft) geplant wird.
Nakaner (2015-02-02 21:46:58+00:00): Am Schwarzwaldbasistunnel wird auch geplant, wenn auch nur auf ganz ganz ganz kleiner Flamme. Trotzdem ist dieser nicht gemappt.

Zitat vom Bundesverkehrswegeplan: "ABS/NBS Badische
Schwarzwaldbahn, Neutrassierung Gutach – Villingen inkl. Schwarzwald-
Basistunnel Gutach – St. Georgen, Vmax 230 km/h" http://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Anlage/VerkehrUndMobilitaet/bvwp-uebersicht-vorhaben-schiene.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

Wie viele Bahnprojekte sind denn in Planung, bei denen eine Umsetzung nicht absehbar ist? Wenn du unbedingt geplante Strecken auf einer Karte haben möchtest, dann nimm bitte die ORM-Tiles als Hintergrund und lege mit Leaflet deine eigenen Daten darüber.
GarryX3D (2015-02-02 23:07:02+00:00): Sorry, der Schwarzwaldbasistunnel ist schon etwas sehr weit her geholt, da wird die nächsten 30Jahre kein Zug durchrollen. Für die Dammerstocker Kurve sehe ich durchaus Potential dass da schon zeitnah zur Eröffnung des Rastatter Tunnels die ersten Züge rollen.
*Martin* (2015-01-29 08:34:30+00:00): Ahoj Spagy

Prosim nezabudni pomenuvat svoje changesety.

Dalej, pre cesty na parkoviskach pouzivaj highway=service + service=parking_aisle.

Tiez odporucem prejst z online iD editora na profesionalny JOSM.

Dakujem
*Martin* (2015-01-29 08:37:17+00:00): http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
Spagy (2015-01-30 21:56:47+00:00): Ahoj Martin,
ďakujem za upozornenie už som to upravil.
JOSM som už začal používať nedávno.
*Martin* (2015-01-31 08:03:20+00:00): Super, vdaka. V pripade akychkolvek otazok kludne pis do nasho fora na osm_sk@googlegroups.com.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-06 00:14:56+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Presumably https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235892533 isn't all building, but instead it's the area within which there is a supermarket building (and car park, and other bits and pieces)?  If so, it would make sense to have a go at drawing the buildings in separately and removing "building=yes" from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235892533 .  Also, there's a bit of a dogleg at the south end, which is partly caused by the supermarket sharing nodes with the road.  It's actually easier to not have landuse sharing nodes with roads (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51511086 next door).

Anyway, hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.

Cheers - Andy.
joost schouppe (2016-12-02 07:55:25+00:00): I have no idea how that happened, but you marked several nodes as a subway entrance. Fixing now.
skyper (2015-01-28 17:17:18+00:00): Hey deproHarry

Schön, dass Du Dich um die Freiburger Radweg kümmerst.

Deine Relation der lcn=yes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4525010) ist jedoch eine Sammelrelation und wird in OSM abgelehnt. Dazu gibt es einiges im Forum bzw auf den Mailinglisten.

Das gleichzeitige Löschen von lcn=yes an den Linien ist dabei noch gravierender. Hiermit brichst Du wohl so einige Auswerter.

Bitte setzte Deine Änderungen wieder zurück und diskutiere vor solchen Löschungen mit der community oder zumindest mit ein paar aktiven Mapper_innen in der Gegend.

Danke und Grüße skyper
SomeoneElse (2015-02-05 19:54:59+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I notice that you've added an office building to OpenStreetMap:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3316697921

However, in order for things to know that it's a solicitors office, you're going to need t tag it as "office=something".  "somthing" probably depends on whether you see yourself as a type of lawyer or not.  This list of how things are tagged elsewhere in the UK may help:

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=solicitor#values
trigpoint (2015-01-28 14:27:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
I see you have added highway=road, that is normally only used if you have no idea what it is, it is better to use one of the other values if you have been there and know what it actually is.
It is also not good to delete and redraw things, as with the station inn, it is better to just add the name if it is missing.
If you need any help, just ask.
BTW The Robin Hood isn't mapped, is it still open?
luschi (2015-02-28 13:39:02+00:00): Für Kiosk gibt es ein extra tag...habe das berichtigt
AsgerFrank (2015-02-01 09:33:07+00:00): Jeg tror det skal være Dampskibs Pladsen, selvom jeg ikke bryder mig om orddelingen, særskrivningen.
Sådan står det i alle adresserne hos ois.dk, og i kommunens anmeldelse til danmarksadresser.dk (med den sære undtagelse her, at "kort over adresser .pdf" siger Dampskibspladsen. Den anden fil med billede "kort.docx" kan jeg ikke åbne.) 
Jeg kender ikke vejskiltet.
AsgerFrank (2015-02-11 18:46:27+00:00): Lagde cykelturen forbi, skiltningen siger Dampskibs Plads, har rettet.
Hjart (2015-02-11 21:58:33+00:00): Jeg tror jeg kun havde set den der pdf på danmarksadresser.dk, så tak :)
AsgerFrank (2015-10-29 11:48:59+00:00): Blot for en ordens skyld, idet jeg trykfejlede i forrige kommentar: der står stadig Dampskibs Pladsen på skiltene.
trigpoint (2015-01-28 18:26:11+00:00): What is the source of these names? 
I have never seen a field with a sign with a name on in Leicestershire.
If surveying ROWs. boundaries such as hedges/fences and stiles/gates are far more useful than small areas of landuse.