piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marc__marc (2020-11-06 23:37:29+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202062123
what's the meaning of class=4 ?
it's about the smoothness ?
class key was depreciated in 2006, can you please try to find a more explicit key  ?
Regards,
Marc
GerdP (2024-07-14 05:07:34+00:00): Moin!
Diese Grenze https://www.osm.org/way/202123677
hat wohl mal zu einer der Relation gehört oder hätte zu einer gehören sollen?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-01-17 09:24:54+00:00): Hi! You've added name=Athlone to all the little piers at Athlone (e.g. this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202136127 ). Is that accurate? Is the name of that pier "Athlone"?
JoergB (2017-01-17 19:11:20+00:00): Hi rorym, I'm not sure if this is the right name. If you have a better you can modify it
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-01-18 08:54:28+00:00): I'm not local, so I'm not sure if they have a name. I'm half tempted to delete them, since I think those little piers wouldn't be named.
JoergB (2017-01-18 11:00:31+00:00): I'm also not local. If you like you can delete them.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-13 15:14:34+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=818750#p818750 ?
pangoSE (2018-08-11 09:13:48+00:00): Föreslår att denna raderas eller flyttas till där gymnasiet finns i stan
GerdP (2015-10-29 20:05:52+00:00): please review node 490231135:
highway=narrow is only used here.
Is this a barrier=choker?
escada (2015-10-30 04:14:51+00:00): no, it has to be narrow=yes, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:narrow
GerdP (2015-10-30 06:38:49+00:00): ahh, I se, thanks for the feedback.
The tag narrow=yes is to be used with ways, not a single node. Bing doesn't show enough info to decide that, do you know where the narrow part starts/ends?
escada (2015-10-30 06:56:36+00:00): I'll try to have a look later on. I have to dig into my notes from that day. Perhaps I just drop it, as I think now that lanes=2, lanes=1 is a better solution (or whatever the number of lanes is before and after the narrowing)
BTW, we can use AGIV aerial images in Flanders, which are more recent and have a better quality.
GerdP (2015-10-30 07:02:49+00:00): okay, thanks, also for the info reg. AGIV.
Always better to have different pictures,
no matter which one is better, as long as both were taken at different times of the day (shadows) and year (leafes, snow, etc)
Polarbear (2017-01-13 17:05:16+00:00): Hi, what does the tag "bicycle:spandex = dismount" mean on node 245035075 and 2121620166 ? I know Spandex as a material to wear, but not as a kind of bike?
Peilscheibe (2015-03-23 22:29:41+00:00): there seems to be some offset to the GPS traces in this changeset. Please consider background image distortion and align them to the GPS traces prior to editing.
6l20 (2019-07-02 20:18:17+00:00): Este camino es falso, despues 3200 metros no es possible de seguir asi. Yo vivo en Pomasqui y puede ayudar si quiere.
6l20 (2019-07-02 20:19:36+00:00): Yo hablo del camino 202194082
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-18 02:49:44+00:00): Hi, Dymo12, I have changed the classification of these roads (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/202228774 

and 

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/202228624) to be track. Thank you
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-02-19 02:34:17+00:00): Hi Dymo12,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/202228734) based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you, happy mapping!
Basstoelpel (2019-03-08 16:51:06+00:00): Hi benilde93,

I can see in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202278437
only a substation, not a power plant. Do you have any knowledge that this in fact is an oil fired power plant?

Baßtölpel
eggie (2021-07-29 06:14:15+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.
Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
BladeTC (2016-05-16 23:20:07+00:00): Alguns objetos estão sem tags, como este https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202296057 Poderia dizer do que se tratam?
Stahlmann (2024-12-12 13:57:47+00:00): Was hat es mit dem Punkt name:VOX00068 auf sich?
Stahlmann (2024-12-12 13:58:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410647149
AndjelaS (2019-02-27 11:19:56+00:00): Dear aezaiwiu,

Do you agree to remove the tag foot=yes because there exists a tag access= permissive and indicating that it is permissive, so foot can’t have a value yes, because it leads to error reporting logical issues in Osmose as 3220 access: Including car, horse, moped, hazmat and so on, unless explicitly excluded?

Regards,
AndjelaS
TheSwavu (2019-02-28 00:27:43+00:00): The access tagging is correct. What it is saying is:

1. All classes are permissive (ie: till the owner says no).
2. Except foot, which has a legal right to access (owner can't say no to foot traffic)
3. Except motor vehicles which don't have access (owner says no). Also prevented by defaults for highway=path.

The problem is going to be with Osmose not correctly parsing the tags.
Dakon (2021-04-02 21:26:49+00:00): Du hast hier railway:signal:main=ne5, railway:signal:main:form=light hinzugefügt. Ist das Absicht oder mittlerweile überholt? Es gibt insgesamt 5 Stück davon in OSM, alle von dir.
rurseekatze (2021-04-03 10:46:29+00:00): Ja, das ist Absicht. Bei den Signalen handelt es sich um spezielle H-Tafeln mit blauem Zusatzlicht, die bei Zugleitbetrieb das Ausfahrsignal ersetzen. Siehe https://www.dampflok7.de/signale/08_ne_signale.php?web=7&db=8.

In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102230758 habe ich das Tagging mal etwas überarbeitet: Das railway:signal:main=ne5 habe ich zu railway:signal:main=DE-ESO:ne5 aktualisiert, ein railway:signal:main:function=exit ergänzt und die Zustände mit railway:signal:main:states=blue;flashing_blue angegeben (habe keine offizielle Bezeichnung für diese Signalbegriffe herausfinden können).

Ich weiß nicht, ob die Signale in der Realität überhaupt noch stehen, da die Eifelquerbahn seit 2013 nicht mehr befahren wird (soll in Zukunft eventuell wieder reaktiviert werden).
RicoElectrico (2023-11-09 19:24:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2217090 - is the name correct?
MittaaDK (2016-01-09 19:24:34+00:00): Hej bør dette stykke vej ikke navngives Sandvejen eller angives som vej mellem parkeringspladser?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27280686
Spectrokid (2016-01-09 19:36:17+00:00): ja, indkørsel eller parkering.  Servicevej behøver ingen navn.
MittaaDK (2016-01-09 21:13:07+00:00): Ok jeg sætter til vej mellem P-Pladser :-)
dieterdreist (2017-05-24 11:27:04+00:00): this edit adds the "tourism=attraction" tag to every single hall in the auditorio, which doesn't seem reasonable. Maybe the Parco della Musica as a whole might be considered an attraction (but within the Roman setting I am not even sure if it is).
Aury88 (2016-03-15 10:08:09+00:00): sei sicuro che via G. Tiepolo (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19748251) sia a senso unico? dalle foto aeree sembra avere il doppio senso di circolazione (ed è abbastanza larga sembrerebbe per il doppio senso di marcia).
ciao
wolfbert (2025-06-01 12:14:51+00:00): Hallo, ist zwar schon lange her, aber vielleicht bist Du ja noch in der Gegend. Ist der Törlweg aktuell Wohnstraße, 20er, 40er, ...?
dee_ksha (2019-07-17 16:56:28+00:00): Hi matx17,

Trust you are well, while working on Langkawi we came across "way 138096746", which are marked as tertiary wherein it needs to be changed to residential.Please look into this share your thoughts.

Thanks in advance.
matx17 (2019-07-18 07:19:23+00:00): Hello dee_ksha,
just change it to what you see is correct. I was there 6 years ago.
Greetings matx17
Johnbo (2019-01-11 12:56:10+00:00): No encuentro ninguna referencia al cambio de nombre del Puente Tablas a "Puente Tablas (Galapagar)". ¿A qué se debe?
GerdP (2015-11-30 13:35:54+00:00): Hi there!
What was meant with 
lanes="Sidewalk Joly Cut Bridge" ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202695433
redsteakraw (2015-11-30 15:04:53+00:00): This looks like the bridge name, I fixed it and added the bridge:name tag.  I war not the one that added this and this was probably a mistake or someone that wanted the name to be there and didn't know what tag to use.  Thank you for spotting the error.
GerdP (2015-11-30 15:07:54+00:00): OK, thanks for the feedback :-)
MichalP (2016-02-11 14:47:22+00:00): hi, this changeset removed various data from chopok ski resort (piste names, dificulty), added some incorrect data (some of the ski slopes). why? what was the source?
Anton Lavrov (2016-02-11 15:02:40+00:00): Hi Michal,

The source was local knowledge (I skied there).

I don't think I actually removed anything, at least intentionally.

I split some runs into relationships, so some segments may be w/o names because they belong to route relationship which has name. Difficulties should be assigned per segment anyway.

What exactly added slopes/runs do you think are incorrect?
MichalP (2016-02-11 17:06:17+00:00): hi, I was afraid of an armchair mapper... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49356595 (name, difficulty and other freeride zones), or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202740744 (slightly off, probably just gps error)
Anton Lavrov (2016-02-12 16:11:08+00:00): I see what you mean now - indeed I removed piste:name, piste:difficulty and piste:type for freeride zones. I don't remember now why I did that, but probably my reasoning was that there's no well-defined piste there, it's just a big area where many downhill lines exist. How do you think these should be mapped? Is there a commonly used approach?

I didn't ski this road with GPS, I mapped it using Bing images. You're welcome to correct it if you have GPS track.
aceman444 (2020-02-23 23:43:58+00:00): Next time also please preserve the accented characters in local names, which were already mapped correctly but you rewrote those characters removing accents, which was quite unnecessary (like name=Lúčka -> name=Kosodrevina - Lúcka). I have fixed it now.
Piskvor (2021-03-09 17:12:59+00:00): Ahoj, není ten kostel nějakej renonc? Podle ortofota to vypadá na zahradní domek, a klánovickej kostel je o pár ulic vedle...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202805283#map=19/50.09988/14.68611
Petr Dlouhý (2021-03-10 05:07:34+00:00): Ahoj,

kreslil jsem to už před 8 lety z katastrální mapy. Pravděpodobně to bude nějaký omyl.
MichaOSM (2015-03-24 15:28:47+00:00): Hallo Obelixx,
gibts die Hochspannungsleitung so noch?
Ich sehe sie in Bing so nicht?
Obelixx (2015-03-25 12:05:01+00:00): Als ich die Leitung einzeichnete, war noch eine andere Version von Bing aktuell!
MichaOSM (2015-03-26 10:35:30+00:00): Alle klar, danke für die Info!
Ich werde mal bei Gelegenheit mir das genauer ansehen, wo die Leitung jetzt genau langgeht und sie "neu verlegen"
Fuss-im-Ohr (2022-07-29 12:31:37+00:00): Wäre ein Verbessern der Links nicht Zweckmäßiger?
Das Löschen ist mir leider jetzt erst aufgefallen
Gruss Jürgen
Jano John Akim Franke (2022-08-01 12:15:19+00:00): Ich verstehe nicht ganz welche Links vor 9 Jahren gelöscht wurden.
Bitte genauer erklären.
Fuss-im-Ohr (2022-08-01 18:17:22+00:00): es lässt sich in der Historie nachvollziehen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171571174/history

Gruss Jürgen
Jano John Akim Franke (2022-08-01 19:38:12+00:00): Die Historie hatte ich mir angesehen, aber nun verstehe ich was gemeint ist.
In diesem Changeset wurden einige für die gesamte Pipeline gültige tags von den Einzelsegmenten (wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171571174) in die Gesamtpipeline-Relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/216254) verschoben. Damit wurde Redundanz abgebaut, das tagging für die gesamte Strecke normiert und die Internationalität der Benennung auf der gesamten Strecke verbessert.
Es ist also keine Information verloren gegangen. Dadurch kann auf Wikipedia, z.B. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transalpine_%C3%96lleitung die gesamte Pipeline vollständig dargestellt werden statt nur einige Segmente mit Unterbrechungen.
Warin61 (2018-06-13 01:08:05+00:00): Hi,
An old entry .. but a question on it. 
Relation: 2723199
  Tags: 
    "landuse"="forest"
    "type"="multipolygon"
    "source"="Bing"
Near Laurieton. Is this simply a collection of trees .. or is it used for timber like a state forest? Given the source is bing I'd say it is a collection of trees, rather than used for timber production.
Peter W34 (2018-06-13 02:59:32+00:00): Hi Warin, Looks like a wooded area but not used for timber production at the moment. It is hard to tell whether it is managed as a forest. I would have kept the tags from the previous mapper.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-18 02:49:46+00:00): Hi, Dymo12, I have changed the classification of this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/202994666) to be track. Thank you
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-09-21 02:51:43+00:00): Hi Dymo12. I changed the classification and geometry  of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/202994671). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
Anisa IRM-ED (2020-11-03 08:19:40+00:00): Hi, Dymo12, I have changed the classification of this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/202994757) to be a residential road and geometry of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-16 08:40:36+00:00): What is the source of data used in this import? What is its copyright status?
NonnEmiliaService (2021-01-16 18:39:32+00:00): Al tempo i dati provenivano dal portale della regione Emilia-Romagna: https://geoportale.regione.emilia-romagna.it/catalogo/dati-cartografici. La regione aveva dato un permesso esplicito per OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Emilia_Romagna.2FEmilia_Romagna_region

Ma ora il dataset non è più disponibile... A posteriori fu un import totalmente sbagliato: per me si potrebbe anche procedere al revert.
A parte qualche tentativo seguente di aggiustarlo non dovrebbero essere state fatte modifiche conflittuali.

Automatic translation in english:

At the time, the data came from the portal of the Emilia-Romagna region: https://geoportale.regione.emilia-romagna.it/catalogo/dati-cartografici. The region had given explicit permission for OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Emilia_Romagna.2FEmilia_Romagna_region

But now the dataset is no longer available... In retrospect it was a totally wrong import: for me it could also be reverted.
Apart from some subsequent attempts to fix it, no conflicting changes should have been made.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-22 11:30:39+00:00): "for me it could also be reverted." - do you want me to make a revert?

As you are author of this edit, I can make this revert if you want.
Maisonave (2019-01-06 15:11:30+00:00): Owners:
David Maisonave
Yaritzie Maisonave
tastenmensch (2015-02-25 19:51:50+00:00): Finde HOstel bzw Hotel hier unpassend. Es handelt sich doch hier um ein betreutes Wohnen wo monatliche Mietzahlungen fließen und nicht um ein paar Tage?!
Shmias (2014-12-28 13:00:39+00:00): Dieses eine Gebäude heißt "bing"?
ivss_xx (2018-02-21 23:33:15+00:00): The way 203213980 is left as an untagged line not belonging to any relation. Which boundary is it supposed to be?
cdavila (2018-02-22 14:55:19+00:00): I'm sorry, but I can't remember about that changeset which is 5 years old. If you are a local mapper, perhaps you can check on the ground what this way belongs to.
user_5359 (2016-11-18 09:20:05+00:00): Hallo Dein Eintrag ist ja schon etwas länger her, aber hast Du etwas dagegen, dass wir den Schützverein mit club=sport, sporting=shooting (wie jetzt üblicher ist) kennzeichnen?
SXSPM (2016-11-18 21:15:35+00:00): That is fine with me.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 12:13:05+00:00): Done!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-06 15:40:23+00:00): is this road really oneway? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203305238/history#map=18/5.71420/-73.53382
PlaneMad (2017-10-20 10:53:17+00:00): Amazing work!
GerdP (2015-10-28 14:45:35+00:00): please review 
way 123769835,way 123769832
The tag highway=steps_area is only 
used here. Maybe 
amenity=bench fits better? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbench
Or is it some kind of barrier?
GerdP (2015-10-29 18:35:16+00:00): please review:
It seems that the highway=control tag is only used here. I think your idea is no longer "work in progress" ?
pyrog (2020-08-28 11:55:45+00:00): Bonjour,

Les lignes 20kV se targuent en power=line

J'en ai corrigé certaines dont :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203407413/history

Cordialement,

__
Yves
FajrAl (2025-10-18 14:45:30+00:00): Semua titiknya tidak benar. Beberapa sudah dihapus sih.
pravenya (2019-04-25 16:47:23+00:00): Hi Raniedwianugrah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the nodes from node 316161472 to node 316161162 and way 341411453 classified as 'Primary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Motorway'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
*Martin* (2015-06-28 16:28:34+00:00): Ahoj Sano

Cesta toho okruhu sama seba niekolkokrat krizuje bez spolocnych bodo. Vyzera to ako surovy import z GPS. Mozes to pls opravit?
*Martin* (2015-06-28 16:29:18+00:00): Jo, a daj tomu pls highway=piste ak v lete tam ziaden chodnik nie je.
laznik (2015-06-28 17:19:43+00:00): No, bola to dobra fuserina :-(
Je to opravene. Neviem ci ma vobec zmysel vkladat do osm taketo efemeralne bezkarske trate, pretoze vacsinou to funguje tak, ze su upravovane jednu - dve sezony a potom s tym "nadsenci" seknu. Info na stranke organizacie ktora to upravovala je 2 roky stare [skarching.wbl.sk] . Ale na druhej strane, ktokolvek to moze vymazat ked to tam uz nie je...

vdaka za upozornenie.
freeExec (2015-01-29 10:11:53+00:00): Слишком много нас. пунктов необосновано понижены в статусе. Откатить.
iWowik (2015-01-29 10:55:21+00:00): По-видимому точки НП и границы НП имели различный place.
freeExec (2015-01-29 11:01:41+00:00): Не, пяток, что я исправил не имели контуров.
frafra (2018-02-10 15:55:31+00:00): Bici e radici risulta essere dalla parte opposta della strada; ho provveduto a correggere. Grazie per i nuovi nodi! (ed attenzione a non esagerare col maiuscoletto ;-) )
DressyPear4 (2022-10-27 04:31:13+00:00): Olá, atenção ao fazer importações.
Você acabou adicionando várias tags inválidas para o osm
pir1 (2015-06-27 08:01:27+00:00): Добрый день, а там реально канава посреди дороги?
b108 (2015-06-29 10:23:27+00:00): Добрый! Где именно? :)
pir1 (2015-06-29 21:15:35+00:00): Не знаю как дать ссылку, в этом пакете правок 26 линия.
b108 (2015-07-03 07:30:44+00:00): Это дренажная труба, поправил её теги! http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203480971
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-02-26 09:02:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203535534

What is supposed to be represented by this object?

It has no tags specifying what is this.
stevea (2020-02-26 17:22:03+00:00): It was a poorly mapped imported polygon.  I have deleted it as such.  Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
frosm (2018-06-16 20:55:42+00:00): Bonjour,
qu'est-ce que c'est exactement l'incubateur ? un incubateur d'entreprise ?
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-05 06:31:29+00:00): Hier wurde PSV=official gesetzt. Mal davon abgesehen, dass official ein stark veraltetes Tagging ist und stattdessen designated verwe set werden sollte, ich kann mir keine Beschilderung mit PSV=designated vorstellen. Ist PSV=yes gemeint? 
Allerdings: es darf dich eh jeder reinfahren, da es keine Beschränkung gibt. Somit überflüssig, oder?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4682975
Sandal man (2021-04-24 11:36:37+00:00): Hi Felixi, do you have the source from this drain?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203713746/

Regards Jan
hee243898 (2022-07-12 07:59:38+00:00): Would it be fine to remove Vaihela restaurant from Salavainen island? The restaurant's actually on another island and has now been placed there.
Plenz (2022-07-14 20:20:20+00:00): Yes of course. The restaurant/hotel is on Vlkuanmaa.
BCNorwich (2017-08-02 15:05:36+00:00): Deleted duplicated wood Way: 203731195
pangoSE (2019-11-08 18:34:34+00:00): Hej!
Jag hittade den här relation 8220689 som verkar vara en stor samling adresspunkter. Vilken nytta har den?
pangoSE (2019-11-08 18:34:54+00:00): Relationen har skapats i detta cs.
sendelbach (2019-11-08 19:21:07+00:00): Relationen du nämner ovan innehåller alla adresser med postadress Sundsvall.
pangoSE (2019-11-08 19:32:26+00:00): Hej, tack för svar.
Var kommer datan ifrån? Vilken nytta har vi av den? Kan samma data erhållas med en overpass sökning?
Det er första gång jag träffer på en sådan här relation. Kan du länka till en wikisida där det står varför vi har sådana?
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 12:29:08+00:00): Hello Jmarcos,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203784775 was changed here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it is an area that you are familiar with, then source=local_knowledge would be the tag to use.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 12:29:40+00:00): Olá Jmarcos,

Espero que não se importe que eu pergunte sobre algo adicionado ao OpenStreetMap 8 anos atrás. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203784775 foi alterado aqui com uma tag "source = Google Maps" nele. Na verdade, não podemos usar isso como uma fonte no OSM porque a licença do Google não permite que seja usado aqui. Se for uma área com a qual você está familiarizado, source = local_knowledge seria a tag a ser usada.

Cumprimentos
Andy Townsend, em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados da OSM
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-14 11:04:38+00:00): O co chodzi  z tym note=TODO w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33720193/history ?
Nakaner (2015-04-16 15:12:53+00:00): Könntest du bitte diesen beiden Signalen ein besseres Tagging geben? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/84673880/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2139008231/history
rurseekatze (2015-04-17 18:04:32+00:00): Die beiden Tafeln sind rechteckig mit weißem Hintergrund und dem schwarzen Schriftzug "Halt für Zug- und Rangierfahrten". Die Tafeln scheinen einmalig zu sein und sind nirgendwo definiert. Deshalb fällt mir im Moment kein geeignetes Tagging ein.
Nakaner (2015-04-17 19:30:39+00:00): Ich glaube wir brauchen ein Tagging für "Hinweisschilder aller Art" (flapsig ausgedrück "Blech gewordene Anweisungen"). Ich habe erst gestern bei der AVG so ein Exemplar entdeckt. "Bei Überholungen hier anhalten, zur Signalanforderung vorfahren." oder "Bahnübergang freihalten" oder "Schrittgeschwindigkeit!"                                                                           

Zum Beispiel railway:signal:note=<Text>.
SomeoneElse (2021-08-13 10:18:09+00:00): Hello CesarFD,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag to the road here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here.
Is it somewhere that you are familiar with?

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2021-08-13 10:18:30+00:00): Hola CesarFD,

Espero que no le importe que le pregunte sobre algo que se agregó a OpenStreetMap hace 8 años. Agregaste una etiqueta "source = Google Maps" a la carretera aquí. En realidad, no podemos usar eso como fuente en OSM porque la licencia de Google no permite que se use aquí.
¿Es algún lugar con el que esté familiarizado?

Atentamente
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de trabajo de datos de OSM
CesarFD (2021-08-13 10:31:47+00:00): Hi.

Err... wow, that was eight years ago, I can't remember why I did edit this nor why this tag was used. In fact I can't recall what this place is.

Sorry. If the edit can't be used I guess it can be removed or edited accordingly.
SomeoneElse (2021-08-13 11:46:14+00:00): Thanks - I've re-edited based on what I can see in the Bing imagery in http://osm.org/browse/changeset/109625906 .  If you can add more with local knowledge, please do!
Klumbumbus (2018-09-22 18:42:22+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1534483, WebatlasSN sagt auch die 14. Kommst du dort mal wieder vorbei zum prüfen?