piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jmapb (2019-01-09 03:03:34+00:00): I like to keep the map and the database as simple as possible, so I'll prefer to add the POI (shop/restaurant/etc) tags to the building itself -- IF, big if, it's the sole tenant of the building. I tagged the post office at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248179013 this way, for example. But in NYC this is rarely the case -- most buildings have multiple tenants. If a building has a separate residential entrance, or multiple commercial units, then I'll generally use a node for the POI.

Similarly with addresses -- if a building has only one address, then the address tags go on the building. If it has more than one, then we use nodes for the various addresses, ideally located near the entrance in question.

This is the addressing method that was used during the NYC building shape import that happened in 2013, so it's best to follow that standard. In Brooklyn it was also decided in most cases to tag the addresses with house number, street name, and zip code only -- the zip code and geographical location both unambiguously put the address in Brooklyn NY USA, so it's not necessary to add the city, state, and country fields. Saves a little time.

Another shortcut is that when placing a POI node in a building that has only one address, there's no need to add the address tags to the POI at all. It will inherit from the building it's in. Though some people do like to add the extra tags anyway. See https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/48735/address-information-in-poi-and-building for a discussion of pros and cons.

Happy mapping, jmapb
viloan (2018-12-31 18:31:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abrensch (2019-01-06 14:41:39+00:00): Hallo,

ich hab' das hier zurueckgesetzt, oneway auf dem Stück kann fast nicht sein, weil dann könnte der unterirdische VErkehr aus Norden nicht aufgenommen werden, und es passt auch nicht zum Sat-Bild.

Gruiss, Arndt
Apexsys (2019-01-06 16:05:13+00:00): Vielen dank, war nicht so ersichtlich, auf StreetComplete. Oder ich hab gepennt ^^
tux67 (2019-01-01 12:07:43+00:00): ? Das hab' ich doch im letzen CS Kommentar zu dem Thema verlinkt?
Auf den Link klicken und lesen .. 
Hundeschule / Reitschule
	Knoten oder Punkt Fläche oder Gebiet
animal=school
school_type=dog/horse
name=*
network=* 	Bemerkungen:

    network=* - Verband dem sich die Schule angeschlossen hat (BHV, BVZ)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65920767
simon484 (2019-01-02 14:51:57+00:00): wenn ich das atraction = animal wegmach wird es zur Linie . Vielleicht kannst du das eintragen ?
tux67 (2019-01-03 07:23:24+00:00): ein area=yes dazu macht es wieder zur Fläche. Hat die Hundeschule, die da trainiert einen Namen?
tux67 (2019-01-03 07:24:27+00:00): bzw. nicht alle renderer scheinen diesen Tag schon anzuzeigen. Bei Osmand klappt es.
Ali Zangeneh (2019-01-01 03:06:32+00:00): دوست عزیز لطفا هر خطی رو که میبینید تبدیل به جاده نکیند ! اگه هم از کوئری استفاده میکنید کار درستی نیست که بدون اینکه یک محدوده رو ببینید تغییرش میدید
ceyockey (2018-12-31 20:21:45+00:00): To the west of Mount Pulaski, Illinois, in rural area.
maraf24 (2019-01-03 20:03:42+00:00): Kolejny duplikat.
Usunąłem.
Firefishy (2019-01-01 15:17:38+00:00): Awesome Edit! Detail greatly appreciated. Any more greatly appreciated.
joost schouppe (2018-12-31 21:51:25+00:00): For more info about the preparations, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Municipality_Fusions
L'imaginaire (2019-01-01 12:48:12+00:00): awesome!
Константин Гам (2019-04-15 16:00:55+00:00): Пожалуйста не мапьте не побывав на местности, а также разберитесь со статусами дорог в осм, вы сломали навигацию на половину колпино!
AlexLetov (2019-04-15 17:12:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. Буду признателен за указание конкретных ошибок. Какие именно дороги сломали навигацию в Колпино наполовину.
Спасибо!
Константин Гам (2019-04-16 07:41:22+00:00): Их названия в описании пакета правок...
На местности финляндская имеет не такой статус... а оборонная ну вопиюще, она одностороняя и местная...
tarta (2019-01-22 19:07:21+00:00): O que é esse JERI? é alguma imgagem de satelite nova?
Lokai (2019-01-01 09:32:50+00:00): Hallo bei OSM,

gib bitte die Telefonnummer International an.

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone

Ciao
ndm (2019-01-01 01:32:40+00:00): Should you be added to the users on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org /wiki/Amazon_Logistics ?
kleroux (2019-01-02 17:17:16+00:00): It looks like I should! I'll get myself added there. Thanks.
tux67 (2019-01-01 12:08:32+00:00): Fehler bei OSMCha .. Feature overlaps with existing features ..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65922626
simon484 (2019-01-02 14:54:11+00:00): Was heißt dass ?
tux67 (2019-01-02 17:13:15+00:00): Heisst, daß du deinen "Park" mitten in das Multipolygon der Kleingartenanlage gesetzt hast. Der ist jetzt erstmal wieder raus. Ist dieser "Park" öffentlich zugänglich? Wenn müsste das Mulipolygon angepasst werden - aber solange nicht klar ist welchen Status diese Fläche hat und du nicht weisst wie das geht würde ich's erstmal so lassen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65922626
Frans S (2019-01-01 09:49:20+00:00): Hallo Jan.  Bedankt voor het mappen hier.
Je hebt een goede opmerking over de Mapbox image. Zeker meer gebouwen. Weet je hoe je de offset aanpast in ID editor? 
Onder Background settings zie je helemaal onderaan de mogelijkheid om je offset aan te passen.
Succes en groeten
Frans S (2019-01-02 10:34:00+00:00): Hi, as discussed in a PM
over 800 buildings not squared
Warnings, 5 crossing building/highways
100 crossing buildings
wrong tagging 5
untagged ways
viloan (2018-12-31 22:31:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-01-01 19:01:24+00:00): I'm cleaning up your telenav:action tags.
highflyer74 (2019-01-02 18:29:19+00:00): Hello!

Will that be changed back at some point and will you take care of it?

Usually the OSM live database is not the place to change data to "to avoid data processing issues" as this is not a testing environment. That should be done with local data on your computer.

A short feedback is appreciated.

All the best to you!
LeifRasmussen (2019-01-02 19:05:28+00:00): Sure, I'll revert this later today. I originally thought that adding the name=* tag was a good idea, but later found that OsmAnd rendered the name of the area:highways, cluttering up the rendering. This changeset, though, is tagging for the renderer, as I now see.  OsmAnd should change, not osm. I'll revert this.
highflyer74 (2019-01-03 08:08:00+00:00): OsmAnd is usually quite nice in using a lot of OSM features in their app, in this case it probably should be rendered optionally (haven't checked if there is a switch for that). Navigation across areas is still not really established anywhere, so most people stick to using the established ways to map roads. I don't envy you guys over there having to clean up TIGER import though ;-) Greets from across the pond!
pio2_122 (2019-01-06 22:32:50+00:00): Brawo, właśnie usunąłeś punkt z nazwą miasta...
maraf24 (2019-01-07 12:11:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26378871
tomhukins (2019-01-21 09:49:35+00:00): Hi, thank you for helping to improve the map.  You had already added Saporitalia in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6175090786 so now there are two restaurants with the same name mapped in almost the same place.  You might want to tidy this up.  Also, as you suggest in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1634102 you might want to remove the information about "Goode & Wright" from the surrounding way if it's gone.

Please let me know if I can help with any of this.
christiaanb (2019-01-21 10:09:59+00:00): Thanks Tom. I managed to delete all the tags but couldn't figure out how to delete the point: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=6175090786#map=19/51.51801/-0.20714
tomhukins (2019-01-21 10:33:26+00:00): Hi, from the link you sent I assume you're using the iD editor.  You can click on the node, then either click the delete key on your keyboard or right click and select the icon.
christiaanb (2019-01-21 10:43:52+00:00): Ha, great, thanks again for your help
tomhukins (2019-01-21 12:28:59+00:00): Thanks again for helping to improve the map.  I've made an extra change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66502923 to remove the one remaining node and combined its information into the surrounding way.
chnav (2019-01-02 10:39:37+00:00): Пожалуйста не вноси фиктивные данные.
Supaplex (2019-02-06 14:33:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:39:02+00:00): This changeset is not problematic.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:23:47+00:00): I'm reverting the way to the version before this changeset, because it seems to have been tagged correctly before. access=permissive is wrong here as well, I think.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:41:51+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:25:46+00:00): Separately reverting because you seem to have unintentionally attached the restaurant to the slip road.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:41:49+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:42:36+00:00): * I already reverted this changeset about 15 minutes ago, sorry. The above
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:42:43+00:00): comment was incorrect
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:40:22+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset separately because the node was previously in alignment with the other nodes of the motorway link.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:41:47+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:41:45+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset.
jc86035 (2019-02-11 16:33:21+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset.

Additional issue: Since the road is at-grade and the bridge has the appropriate layer tag, layer=-1 is not necessary here.
nevw (2019-01-02 04:43:29+00:00): highway=path is more suitable than highway=footway away from towns where the surface is not concrete or asphalt. 
I expect most mappers would liken highway=footway to those sidewalks and paved footways in townships.
nevw (2019-01-02 04:45:37+00:00): highway=path is more suitable than highway=footway away from towns where the surface is not concrete or asphalt. 
I expect most mappers would liken highway=footway to those sidewalks and paved footways in townships.
nevw (2019-01-02 04:49:11+00:00): oops, posted twice.
Here is a section from the Australian Tagging Guidelines 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Bush_Walking_and_Cycling_Tracks
garethdenyer (2019-01-02 09:51:48+00:00): my apologies...  I'll change to highway=path.  I will also need to correct some other ones that I recently added.  Thanks for pointing this out.
Sanniu (2019-01-02 08:18:10+00:00): You are wrong here, there IS a road into construction site, please revert
Heinz_V (2019-01-20 10:14:12+00:00): Here you deleted a road. I made corrections. Take care that this error doesn t happen again.
Greeshmag (2019-01-21 05:43:15+00:00): Actually Where is the mistake?
geoaria (2019-01-02 16:12:04+00:00): در صورت ترسیم معابر یکطرفه ، ورودی و خروجی مسیر ها را مشخص کنید مسیر یکطرفه ترسیم کرده اید که از هیچجا ورود ندارد. با  osmi خطای شما شناسایی و اصلاح شد. مزاقب باشید ترسیم به این صورت به جز اختلال در امر مسیریابی فایده ای ندارد
geoaria (2019-01-02 16:13:47+00:00): حتما قوانین osm را مطالعه و سپس به ادیت نقشه بپردازید. اشتباهات شما بسیار زیاد است. خواهشمند است تا زمانی که روش ترسیم نقشه را نیاموخته اید ترسیم نکنید
jmapb (2019-01-04 02:54:09+00:00): Hi Elinorzag -- this changeset seems to have removed all tagging from these two buildings. Can you check? Thanks, jmapb
jmapb (2019-01-06 17:34:15+00:00): Hi Elinorzag -- please take a look at this problem. Otherwise I'll be inclined to revert this changeset before it gets overtaken by other changes and difficult to revert. Thanks, jmb
jmapb (2019-01-07 20:06:09+00:00): Reverted in changeset 66107808. Elinorzag, please feel free to comment or message me to discuss what you're trying to do here. Offhand I don't think a multipolygon is needed here; in fact I'm not sure it's even appropriate to tag either of these buildings with name=Google's NYC HQ as these are buildings with many diverse tenants.
Supaplex (2019-02-23 19:51:44+00:00): Shifen Old Street is duplicated 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219150987
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65927657
Jakka (2019-01-01 09:51:30+00:00): Impasse nom officiel ? Il y a des restriction traffic ?
H2O-Hony (2019-01-01 11:25:17+00:00): Pour la ruelle en impasse, c'est un accès vers un garage prolongée par une partie piétonne donc public.  Il y a un poteau côté Meuse pour empêcher le transit.  Il n'y a pas d'accès vers une habitation.
Mon dessin représente une première partie carrossable complétée par une partie piétonne.  OK? Correct?
Merci de m'informer si j'ai mal dessiné.
Jakka (2019-01-01 18:57:59+00:00): bien dessiner. "accès vers un garage" mieux utiliser highway=service voir info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
Supaplex (2019-02-23 20:15:33+00:00): duplicated 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450771065#map=17/24.17825/120.64591
Supaplex (2019-02-23 20:16:19+00:00): duplicated
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560332944
Supaplex (2019-02-23 20:16:51+00:00): duplicated
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6292763386
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-18 15:18:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148822076 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some anti-Mormon vandalism and other rubbish
zors1843 (2019-01-01 09:52:55+00:00): You could use :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=playground. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
PupInGear (2019-01-01 09:46:44+00:00): ** Packard Plant
Baloo Uriza (2019-01-01 18:31:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65939487 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.
_-_-_-_ (2019-01-01 10:31:08+00:00): Dit ziet er niet helemaal correct uit, zou ik eens een GPS-track maken van de wandelpaden hier? een nauwkeurigheid van ~3m moet dan wel kunnen in iedergeval.
eggie (2019-01-01 11:47:15+00:00): Kun je altijd doen, maar het is al ingemeten. Wanneer dat goed is gedaan is een gps track minder nauwkeurig. 
Maar ook de BGT is niet altijd te vertrouwen. :)
De rendering loopt nog achter hier. Wanneer je de humanitarian-layer zou bekijken zie je dat het al anders is. 
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-01 11:55:35+00:00): Ctrl-F5 wil ook nog wel eens helpen om sneller te laten renderen.
confusedbuffalo (2019-01-03 13:11:14+00:00): This, or possibly other edits of yours here recently seem to have affected this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2255290
As I don't know the area very well, can you fix it?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:12:32+00:00): Hello!

You used
amenity=event_venue
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6176208228/history

Have you maybe meant
amenity=events_venue
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
escada (2025-04-29 08:42:24+00:00): It's a typo. feel free to fix it.
Unfortunately, I can't spend much time on OSM at the moment.
mavl (2019-01-01 10:51:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 65875392, 65876055, 65878015, 65878035, 65878040, 65878073, 65878133, 65882831, 65882845, 65882904, 65882912, 65882921, 65882924, 65884282.
chnav (2019-01-03 15:53:42+00:00): Поясните что это за отношение и где найти подтверждение существование такого сложного автобусного маршрута под названием "ОБВ".

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9172518
chnav (2019-01-04 07:13:45+00:00): Судя по невнятному объяснению на форуме https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=732143#p732143

данное отношение содержит все дороги, по которым имеется движение общественного транспорта. Это фиктивный автобусный маршрут, который должен быть удалён. Смотрите статью в вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Отношения/Отношения_не_являются_категориями
chnav (2019-01-04 07:14:43+00:00): REF: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9172518
chnav (2019-01-04 11:15:58+00:00): Fake bus route deleted, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Отношения/Отношения_не_являются_категориями
wille (2019-01-03 14:20:21+00:00): Well done! Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65929863
gileri (2019-01-01 15:55:59+00:00): Bonjour,

access=private puis motorcar=yes veut dire que l'accès est privé pour tous, sauf pour les voitures, pour qui l'accès est public.

Je crois que la seule manière d'indiquer que c'est un accès privé uniquement pour certains véhicules c'est de faire :

access=no
motorcar=private
bicycle=private
...

Ou sinon plus simple, un simple access=private seul vu que la très grande majorité des véhicules peuvent le traverser, quitte à rajouter un maxheight=* ou autres restrictions physiques.
Anakil (2019-01-01 16:18:52+00:00): Bonjour LiP'tiFouineu,

Merci de tes contributions, juste quelques points à faire attention : Le landuse (i.e. l'utilisation du sol comme "zone résidentielle" par exemple) ne doivent pas avoir d'autre tag que celui du landuse (donc pas d'addresse) et ne doivent si possible pas se superposer. Il faut aussi éviter de faire plein de petit polygone de landuse côte à côte qui ont exactement les mêmes attributs (landuse=residential ici), il faut en faire un gros qui englobe la zone car comme le nom l'indique il s'agit juste d'indiquer une "zone résidentielle" contrairement à une zone agricole… 

Sinon, il faut donc éviter de tagger l'addresse sur autre chose qu'un bâtiment ou un point isolé (si jamais un bâtiment contient beaucoup d'addresses (comme un immeuble), on peut mettre des points d'adresse un à côté de l'autre). Voir le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr 

D'ailleurs, il ne faut pas hésiter à regarder le wiki si on doute de ce que veut dire un tag (ou attribut), il est généralement disponible dans plusieurs langues (au moins en anglais, et souvent en français,...). 

Si tu as des questions, n'hésites pas à demander à la communauté belge via un des contacts possible (réseaux sociaux, e-mail ou chat Riot (ou IRC) : voir la liste ici https://openstreetmap.be/contact.html

Bien à toi,
Anakil
LiP'tiFouineu (2019-01-03 17:50:29+00:00): Bonsoir Anakil,

Merci beaucoup pour ton aide précieuse. Après mes modifications, j'ai reçu quelques pointeurs d'aide également.

Je vais vérifier ce que j'ai fait et adapter suivant tes recommandations.

Merci encore

Li P'ti Fouineu
gscscnd (2019-01-01 14:00:23+00:00): Do bardziej szczegółowego otagowania możesz wykorzystać https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhunting_stand
gscscnd (2019-01-01 14:00:56+00:00): Opis zestawu zmian nie pasuje do zawartości
gscscnd (2019-01-01 13:56:25+00:00): Zamiast name=Paśnik ustaw coś z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfeeding_place
Dynamikum (2019-01-01 13:19:41+00:00): Hallo Dirk,

bist du sicher, dass es ein Fußweg (Schild mit Zeichen 239) oder nicht doch engl. path, allgemein für Weg.
Fußweg ist eine eigene Klasse innerhalb highway.

Gruß

D.
dirkschoen (2019-01-02 18:31:56+00:00): Hatte ich nicht bemerkt. Jetzt müsste es stimmen.
shogun (2019-01-02 07:32:57+00:00): dieses stück der Straße ist keine Einbahnstraße.
das ist die zufahrt zum Friedhof die Einbahnstraße beginnt dahinter https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/6jIAzWRkgHgbCt_sCwORKg
BC168 (2019-01-06 23:40:49+00:00): Quelle für diese Änderung? Ich bezweifle, daß der höchste Punkt der Halde mitten im Horizontobservatorium ist, denn da geht es zur Mitte hin sogar ein paar Treppenstufen runter.
Hjart (2019-01-01 14:09:38+00:00): Bemærk at hvis man må cykle på en sti, skal den enten tagges highway=cycleway eller have et bicycle=yes/designated. Hvis den kun er tagget highway=path, bliver den rangeret meget lavt i cykelrouterne. Nissedalstien kan også med fordel tagges motor_vehicle=no: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/bNXdEnQXlD6ewQQSKnA4_Q
czubi (2019-01-02 15:50:24+00:00): Hallo,
noch einmal meine Bitte die Gebäude nicht überlappen zu lassen und ordentlich zu verbinden. Wäre schön wenn du hier mal ein kurzes Statement reinschreiben würdest damit deine Mitmapper erkennen können das du den Hinweis gelesen hast. Danke
czubi (2019-09-11 16:41:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6166884993
Bitte name=* nur für Eigennamen verwenden.
Die Höhe von Schornsteinen gehört nicht dazu, die kannst Du ggf. mit height angeben
czubi (2019-09-12 12:20:25+00:00): man_made=water_works ist doppelt. einmal am gelände und einmal am gebäude
Wiesel-01 (2019-09-12 13:36:25+00:00): habe es gelesen und achte künftig doppelt drauf
czubi (2019-09-12 13:40:22+00:00): Ok. Danke für die Rückmeldung! Wenn du Fragen hast immer gerne. Einige Sachen musst du noch selber einbessern. Einige habe ich schon gemacht.
Grüsse und fleißiges Weitermappen.
Wiesel-01 (2019-09-12 13:57:17+00:00): Dankeschön
marcoSt (2019-06-04 10:43:33+00:00): Hello kujaw,
I have a question because of this street: Aleja Marszałka Edwarda Śmigłego-Rydza in Lodz. Do you know if the construction has completed, yet? If not, when will it be ended? Thanks a lot.
1200562 (2019-06-05 16:55:54+00:00): Zamknięte / Closed
1-2 yrs.