piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2020-10-15 20:06:09+00:00): hola Emilce.  seguramente te habrán comentado tus asesores y compañeras: en iD existe la manera muy sencilla para que los edificios resulten rectangulares.  en la realidad, casi todos los ángulos de las casas son rectos.
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
las esperamos en el grupo Telegram, o en el forum osm #61.
mariotomo (2020-12-04 15:45:07+00:00): una inquietud: qué es el "Club GIS4SCHOOLS"?  gracias.
mariotomo (2020-11-25 19:30:44+00:00): estás en un proceso de aprendizaje, cierto? si quieres ayuda, estamos a toda disposición.  me confirmas tu interés por seguir mapeando?
mariotomo (2020-10-15 20:05:40+00:00): hola María.  seguramente te habrán comentado tus asesores y compañeras: en iD existe la manera muy sencilla para que los edificios resulten rectangulares.  en la realidad, casi todos los ángulos de las casas son rectos.
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
las esperamos en el grupo Telegram, o en el forum osm #61.
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 03:58:36+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM. I reviewed your changeset and determined that can be IMPROVED. You added a pitch and didn't add its associated tags. https://bit.ly/2T8zXIR. I don't understand the reason for the hexagon area.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92286091
bikingaround244 (2022-01-27 17:48:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857624939/history 

I am going to shorten the length of the steps you added here
Rainero (2020-11-19 11:01:40+00:00): Hallo betz_kai,
du hast den Straßennamen Blumenstraße in Zuhause geändert. Das war sicher ein Versehen, oder?
Dann würde ich die Änderung wieder rückgängig machen.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
eggie (2020-10-11 09:36:43+00:00): Dag Stijn,

In principe gebruiken we de BAG adresnode om op bij te taggen. 
Nu komt het adres 2x voor. 
Kijk je nog even?

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-11 09:38:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Christouf0676 (2021-02-21 10:27:21+00:00): J'ai l'impression qu'à Sospel l'avenue de la République https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151095889 et les alentours on souffert de ce changeset (je peux tromper...)
gendy54 (2021-02-22 11:13:55+00:00): En effet, y a eu du déplacement de rue par inadvertance.

Je corrige ca à midi.

Donat
gendy54 (2021-02-28 08:56:09+00:00): Le contributeur qui avait fait une boulette a corrigé ;)
Christouf0676 (2021-03-01 19:48:24+00:00): merci bien
sorcrosc (2020-10-11 02:41:00+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto. Ti faccio notare che le restrizioni di accesso si utilizzano solo quando ci sono cartelli di divieto. Per i sentieri puoi comunque utilizzare etichette che ne indicano la difficoltà, visibilità, tipo di superficie, ...
Se un sentiero fisicamente non esiste forse è meglio eliminarlo proprio (capita che qualcuno inserisca tracce che ha percorso anche se non c'è un sentiero permanente).
 
Lorenzo
Amerigo D (2020-10-12 14:20:05+00:00): Ok, grazie dei consigli. Il sentiero in questione di fatto non c'è più ci si ritrova tra le zolle arate.
eggie (2020-10-11 09:31:54+00:00): Dag Stijn,
Je info heb ik samengevoegd met adresnode 21c
In OSM maken we niet zelf nog een keer adressen aan. Je had hier 12c aangemaakt. Denk een vergissing?
Anders hoort het bedrijf ergens anders. 
Je edits

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92286687

MVG,
eggie
Stijn Rogiest (2020-10-11 09:58:41+00:00): Hoi eggie

Dat was inderdaad een vergissing. 21c is het juiste adres. Bedankt om dit aan te passen.

Mvg Stijn
mosstreet (2020-10-11 08:21:58+00:00): La edición es terrible, no lo corrigió, arruinó el mapa, la carretera, si cometió un error hay botones para regresar al menú.
porfiriopaiz (2020-10-11 08:28:45+00:00): Unfortunately I had to revert this changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92286826

Since it breaks the existing data, in addition it also breaks the relations for public transport routes:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92286826

Please feel free to re-add your contribution, but being careful not to break existing data. This is the object you should edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628361893

I share the keys and the values ​​that you must add to the object in order to make your contribution effective again:

addr:full=Cocina de Doña Haydee Carretera a Masaya, 1c al norte
amenity=cafe
building=yes
cuisine=coffee_shop
internet_access:fee=no
internet_access:ssid=LA TOSTADERIA
internet_access=wlan
name=La Tostadería
opening_hours=Mo-Su 07:00-23:00
outdoor_seating=yes

Thanks for your contribution.

Polite as usual, the OSM Nicaragua QA Team.
mariotomo (2020-10-15 19:50:02+00:00): Hola Karen, que bien que sigas mapeando.  te hago un apunto sobre los senderos cubiertos, como en el caso del edificio Way: 857637229.  se trata de dos building, conectados por un path, con `covered=yes`.  es muy común en instalaciones como las escuelas.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-10-11 09:38:14+00:00): Hallo matapiet,

bitte bei Namen (name) nur echte Namen eintragen und keine Beschreibungen. Hierfür gibt es den Schlüssel description. Besser noch wäre es die Objekte über den Tag zu beschreiben: Z.B. Scheune: building=yes -> building=barn. 

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Hier gibt es eine Übersicht der Gebäude-tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building

Gruß Roger Wilco
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-11 13:51:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92302317 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some more Pokemon Go-vandalism (including deleting stuff) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3983 .
PT-53 (2020-10-11 07:03:32+00:00): Hallo RicoSc,
"Walzmühle (Lager)" und Walzmühle(alte Säge)" u.a. sind keine Eigennamen.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Ich habe die Einträge auf Description abgeändert.
Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-11 13:51:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92302317 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some more Pokemon Go-vandalism (including deleting stuff) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3983 .
PT-53 (2020-10-11 06:55:26+00:00): Hallo  RicoSc,
Adressen gehören an die Gebäude und nicht an die Hoffläche.
Ich habe das entspr. berichtigt und die Gebäude noch anhand Maps4BW angepaßt.
Maps4BW kann man im Editor im Menür Bildmaterial-Einstellungen am rechten Bildschirmrand einblenden.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW
Schau Dirs mal an.
Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-11 13:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92302317 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some more Pokemon Go-vandalism (including deleting stuff) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3983 .
user_5359 (2020-10-12 03:10:16+00:00): Why don't you use the standard keys but put a hash sign (#) in front of them?

Pourquoi n'utilisez-vous pas les clés standard mais mettez un signe dièse (#) devant elles ?
FoeNyx (2020-10-17 18:27:39+00:00): Une erreur d'inattention probablement, désolé. Sur quel(s) élément(s) est-ce ? (j'ai tenté une recherche par Overpass Turbo, mais je ne le(s) retrouve pas)
FoeNyx (2020-10-17 18:29:35+00:00): Sorry I was probably distracted, on which element(s) is it ? I tried to find it back with overpass turbo but failed to find it :(
user_5359 (2020-10-18 04:48:51+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30965967/history (as example)

Veuillez consulter le site https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30965967/history (à titre d'exemple)
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2020-10-11 13:09:57+00:00): Hi ☺
This is quite a large changeset. Consider adding a changeset comment (see guidelines here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ).
matthiam (2020-11-29 13:36:28+00:00): @Mordechai23, it seems that the field (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857648116) 
needs to be updated because it was prepared for a construction of a housing      
(https://www.temporary-url.com/DE6D7). matthiam
maro21 (2021-04-23 20:43:13+00:00): matthiam: fixed: https://www.osm.org/way/934453706
ZeLonewolf (2020-10-13 03:26:45+00:00): Hello, this change broke the boundary of Naperville.  It is now an unclosed polygon.  Are you able to fix this problem?
lectrician1 (2020-10-13 03:47:10+00:00): The boundary originally shared nodes with the Modaff Road Way next to Springbrook Prairie. I had disconnect it temporarily from the road in order to edit some of the road's tags since I could not select the road without selecting the overlaying boundary in iD. I edited the tags and then returned the boundary back to its original position, however, I may have split it or deleted it in the process of doing so. I cannot find the other part of the boundary that should be along Modaff Road anymore. I cannot fix it.
lectrician1 (2020-10-13 03:55:11+00:00): Fixed
ZeLonewolf (2020-10-13 03:56:03+00:00): I have corrected the boundary.  Please do not leave boundaries broken in this way as it breaks data consumers that use this data.  I strongly recommend using JOSM rather than iD for non-trivial edits.
A67-A67 (2020-10-10 23:58:43+00:00): Bij verbindingswegen gebruik je niet het wegtype van het wegdeel zelf maar het hoogste van de twee wegtypen dat deze weg verbindt. In dit geval is het een verbindingsweg tussen een trunk (autoweg) en secondary (secundaire weg), dus dat wordt een trunk_link (verbindingsweg van/naar autoweg).
JeroenvanderGun (2020-10-11 12:44:10+00:00): Ik begrijp je bezwaar tegen "secondary_link", dus ik heb er nu "secondary" van gemaakt. Nu klopt de logica van "trunk_link" wel, maar heeft de "trunk_link" ook de juiste lengte.
A67-A67 (2020-10-11 13:02:53+00:00): Alleen trunk betekent autoweg, trunk_link is een verbindingsweg van of naar een autoweg. Die hoort gewoon door te lopen tot de kruisende weg.
Eventueel kun je met de tag motorroad=yes de exacte afbakening van de autoweg op de verbindingsweg aangeven.
JeroenvanderGun (2020-10-11 19:07:09+00:00): Ik ben even in de regels voor links gedoken, maar zoals ik het lees is het niet de bedoeling om plaatsen waar je mag lopen als motorway_link te markeren:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link#Special_considerations_for_motorways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link#Other_situations

Ik zal wel het tunk_link-gedeelte hier omzetten naar motorway_link, want die overgang is niet relevant voor toegangsrestricties.
A67-A67 (2020-10-11 19:28:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/1/16/This_table_highlights_how_you_connect_different_types_of_highway%2C_based_on_the_type_of_the_highway._.png
A67-A67 (2020-10-11 19:31:25+00:00): Deze tabel staat op de pagina over highway_links. Daarop is te zien dat een verbindingsweg tussen een trunk en secondary een trunk_link is. 

Een andere manier om te zien wat de consensus over een bepaald onderwerp is binnen OSM, is door te kijken naar de manier waarop vergelijkbare situaties in kaart zijn gebracht. In dit geval zie je bijvoorbeeld dat (vrijweg) alle op- en afritten in Nederland op dezelfde manier zijn getagd: de gehele op- of afrit is motorway_link of trunk_link. Het wegtype verandert niet bij het verkeersbord begin/einde auto(snel)weg.
Glassman (2020-10-12 20:20:08+00:00): Tip: Try to draw the outline of the roof to help people identify buildings. From the imagery, these building doesn't look much like the image.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92290042
Glassman (2020-10-12 20:22:03+00:00): Sometime using different imagery can better clarity. Use the layers icon on the right hand side of the editor to select different imagery.
aweech (2020-10-11 13:37:16+00:00): Hi, what did you mean by placing a minor/unclassified road in Jaffrey? I couldn't find anything through aerial imagery, is it new construction?
!bm (2020-10-11 07:20:07+00:00): Hallo Aleloading,
willkommen zu OSM! #ReviewRequest:

Vermutlich ein Versehen, aber zur Klarheit erwähnt: POI wie Geschäfte und Unternehmen gehören nicht an die Gebäudeoutline! (Auch wenn man das leider oft sieht). Außerdem jedes Feature nur einmal mappen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element

Geändert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92293589

--besteGrüße!bm
PT-53 (2020-10-11 06:32:15+00:00): Hallo  Knarvel,
"Anlage 4508, Mast 259" ist kein Eigenname. Ich habe diese Ergänzung daher wieder gelöscht.
Bitte beachte:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Grüße
Knarvel (2020-10-11 08:24:05+00:00): Aus og Wiki-Seite: " Es zählt, wie die Objekte "draußen" genannt werden." und das is wirklich nur eine Mastnummer wie auf dem Mastschild zu lesen ist. Werde mir aber weiter von diesen Sache fernhalten, beschäftige mich lieber mit Sinnvolleres.
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:08:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92290630
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:18:53+00:00): It looks like you accidentally added a building on top of an existing building. I fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92290660
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:09:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92290688
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:10:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92290698
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:10:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92290725
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:10:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92290747
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:12:01+00:00): Tip: typically at each node a pole is added. They can be spotted from their shadow. Place the node at the base of the pole.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92290801
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:15:07+00:00): Tip: when adding crosswalks, use a node to mark the curb ramp or lack of a curb ramp along with tactile_pad=yes if there is one.  See https://www.snowandsnow.us/articles/Mapping-Sidewalks-iD/ for instructions I wrote a while back.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92291047
samito22 (2020-10-11 03:40:22+00:00): أيها العابث المشاغب الذي يحذف تعديلاتي مع عدم وجود خطأ أو عبث مني ..ولي مئات التعديلات والإضافات على الخريطة وأعلم جيدا الخطأ والصواب ..ومحطة الشرق الأوسط أكثر من كونها محطة فنحن من عشرات السنوات وهي ملتقى لنا ولكثير من الكشاتة ...وهي من المعالم المهمة والبارزة جدا على طريق رفحا سامودة ...والمقصود من إضافتها كـ موضع مع وجود اسمها كمحطة هو الرغبة في ظهورها على مستوى أعلى لمتصفحي الخريطة ...فوجودها كمحطة فقط لايظهرها عند تصفح الخريطة إلا على مستوى (500م) وأقل في الوضع الافتراضي ..وإياك ثم إياك أيها المشاغب أن تمنح لنفسك الصلاحية بالعبث في اجتهادات الآخرين وإضافاتهم التي قد يخفى عليك فائدتها او الحكمة منها ...والحذف يكون فقط عند الخطأ الظاهر الواضح البين الذي لا شبهة فيه ..مع أملي الكبير وثقتي البالغة بتحكيم عقلك ورجوعك عن عبثك بتعديلاتي ..وتقبل تحياتي لك ولكل مجتهد
saudotb (2020-10-13 09:05:24+00:00): مرحبا اخ samito 
أوضح لك أن الحذف صحيح لعدة أسباب. 
1- الإضافة فئتها غير صحيحة وهي عبارة عن محطة بترول وانت أضفتها كنقطة موضع.
2- المحطة مسجلة سابقاً واسمها صحيح الشرق الأوسط وفئتها صحيحة.
تبريرك ان الاسم يكون بشكل أوضح وأعلى ما يسمح لك بتغيير نظام الموقع وتصنيف النقاط، واذا اردت ذلك بإمكانك مراسلة مطوري الخريطة التي تسنخدمها بإقتراح تعديلك في برنامجهم اما ما يخص الخريطة فالفئات واضحه وليست قابله للعبث من الجميع. بسبب أن الخريطة مستخدمة في أكثر من برنامج ملاحة ومواقع طقس عالمية.
كما أرجو منك حذف النقطة للأسباب السابقة 
تقبل ردي بصدر رحب
!bm (2020-10-11 07:40:25+00:00): Hallo niklas_152,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM! 

oneway=no ist in Abwesenheit von *=yes stets impliziert, die explizite Angabe sollte nur in Ausnahmefällen erfolgen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#oneway_.3D_no  

Im Fall der BulgarischenStr kann man das evt noch gelten lassen, obwohl eine Sackgasse natürlich keine Einbahn sein kann.

Entsprechend zurückgesetzt in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92293889

--besteGrüße!bm
niklas152 (2020-10-11 07:53:07+00:00): Hallo !bm,

danke für das Feedback!
Tatsächlich habe ich nur in StreetComplete ( https://f-droid.org/packages/de.westnordost.streetcomplete ) die Fragen zu oneway bekommen und daher ausgefüllt - aber dann werde ich das zukünftig nur noch für den positiven Fall machen.

Grüße, niklas
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 04:47:23+00:00): Thank you for adding information to OSM.
I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD.

The most common method of mapping villages is with a node placed at the center. For the size of your ways they look like place:hamlet. Villages are around 1000 pp.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92291539
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-11 10:06:53+00:00): I'm happy to be corrected but iirc the gaps in the cycleway have a no bicycles sign (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Bxx3KlNCnPhQox2pDQA59Q). Although I wouldn't be surprised if that was just during construction to improve safety for workers. If there is no explicit signage in the other direction then the tagging looks good.
aharvey (2020-10-11 10:55:29+00:00): The bottom no bicycles sign is no longer there, only the top two, I have Mapillary captured, but won't get a chance to upload it for maybe a week.
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-11 11:01:47+00:00): No worries just wanted to confirm, updated imagery will be very useful
tastrax (2020-10-12 10:34:09+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
azakh-world (2020-10-11 18:47:16+00:00): Why do you remove railway=station tag from subway stations? E.g., node 6469414578.
Hervé TUC (2020-10-12 04:09:16+00:00): Because as my understanding, with PTv2 you don't need this anymore, I reserve it for train stations; and use public_transport=station and subway=yes for the subway stations.
azakh-world (2020-10-12 07:43:44+00:00): PTv2 is not acknowledged by all mappers. You will have a right to remove railway=station tag if the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation tag is deprecated by the community, not earlier.
parsd51 (2020-10-11 07:36:53+00:00): Hej osmviborg

Hvad er dine kilder til vejenes færdiggørelse?

Hilsen
parsd51
osmviborg (2020-10-11 08:44:30+00:00): Survey https://imgur.com/a/6bFq8gW
parsd51 (2020-10-11 09:05:59+00:00): Tak, jeg havde lige fundet dronebillederne fra september i år.

Jeg ville skrive safe-con.dk i kilder. Survey for mig er “on location”, ikke internet survey.

﻿Hvis der ikke er nogen kilde og andre kigger på luftbilleder forår 2020, tilbagefører de måske vejene. Ligesom med bygninger og nye/gamle luftbilleder.
osmviborg (2020-10-11 09:14:19+00:00): Ortofoto er fra foråret. Jeg tror de fleste vil være bekendt med at tiden ikke har stået stille siden april måned og at konstruktionsarbejdet er tilendebragt.
parsd51 (2020-10-11 09:21:37+00:00): Ja, det kan du ha’ ret i :-)
dval (2020-10-11 15:42:07+00:00): Hi, Energizer1986! Вы переквалифицировали участки дороги Кытлым-Павда. Я сам хотел (но не успел) переклассифицировать кытлымскую половину в анкласс. (когда-то, кажется, так и было), но мне не понятно, зачем было ставить трек на павдинскую половину, поскольку это одна дорога Кытлым-Павда. Чем вы руководствовались?
Energizer1986 (2020-10-11 15:48:11+00:00): Прямая дорога Кытлым- Павда от Павды до газопровода в довольно плохом состоянии.На тракторе норм. на машине нет. все фактически кому надо ездят в объезд через Каменку. А вот после газопровода там более менее.
Energizer1986 (2020-10-11 15:54:29+00:00): Так как местные это и так знают. А вот приезжие нет. Прокладка маршрута в навигаторе в первую очередь идет по нормальным дорогам. И если надо просто проехать. то лучше чтоб машина не встряля посреди леса изза того что дорога на Кытлым проложена напрямую,  а ехала по плохонькой, но дороге в объезд
dval (2020-10-11 19:37:40+00:00): Ваши рассуждения нарушают правило ОСМ: "highway=track не обозначает "качество" дороги, её покрытие, наличие выраженной колеи. Тег не предназначен для указания разбитых, узких, не имеющих покрытия дорог и дорог, передвижение по которым может быть затруднено!". Если дорога плохая, то на нее надо навешать теги проезжести и состава/материала поверхности. У меня на этом участке стояли интермидиэйт (ближе к Павде) и бэд (дальше). Пожалуй, сейчас я поставил бы везде бэд или верибед (как-нибудь проверю ещ раз). Именно на это должны реагировать навигационные программы. Есть прямая дорога Павда-Кытлым, и она должна на всем протяжении проклассифицирована одинаково. Проезд до Кытлыма через Каменку или Карпинск к дороге Павда-Кытлым отношения не имеет.
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:20:04+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92292641
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:19:44+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92292662
Glassman (2020-10-11 23:20:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92292710
Zimbabadoo (2020-10-11 06:44:49+00:00): added building
Ahras (2020-10-12 13:50:08+00:00): Hello,

You have completely deleted all the Amazigh names, you have also deleted the French names with your changes. It's clear vandalism.

Please read the following wiki page, before you start editing further: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism

I'm going to come back to all of your change sets that include vandalism. Further acts of vandalism will be reported to the Data Working Group (DWG).

Greetings.
user_10059623 (2020-10-12 14:00:54+00:00): هدإ من روعك،
إطلع جيدا على تفاصيل التسمية وستجد أن التسمية البربرية للمنطقة مازالت محفوظة.
ما فعلته هو أنني صححت الاسم من 'تشدة" إلى "تاشودة" الاسم الصحيح.
إضافة إلى أن تاشودة منطقة عربية والأصل هو كتابة أسماء المناطق بلغة أهلها.
كفاك من التهديدات الفارغة
شكرا
marc__marc (2023-05-09 23:41:56+00:00): Hello,
I didn't understand the change
unattended, in this context, is a vaccant area
so a disused:shop=unattended mean it was an vaccant area, not anymore :)
I suppose it'sn't the meaning you want but maybe disused:shop=yes
Regards,
Marc
demon_box (2021-07-15 13:35:38+00:00): ciao, a S.Antonio di Nave la parte destra dell'edificio l'hai taggata come chiesa anch'essa ma non è così, quella è la foresteria. procedo io alla correzione. grazie, buon mapping
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 04:42:31+00:00): Thank you for adding information to OSM.
I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD.

El Key:operator seguramente no es 1. Si no sabes la información no lo etiquetes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92293555