piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2019-07-01 23:09:50+00:00): dag CNugteren,
Alle begin is moeilijk, Er moesten ook nog wat dingen worden verwijderd van de aangrenzende wegen en de brug zelf.
Oa Construction= kan verwijderd worden.
motorvehicle=no is niet meer van toepassing.
ik heb wat aanvullende wijzigingen doorgevoerd, zodat alles weer routeert.
CNugteren (2019-07-02 19:06:18+00:00): OK, bedankt, ik heb het gezien. Hopelijk gaat het de volgende keer wel in 1x goed :-)
Glassman (2019-07-02 00:08:54+00:00): The Walmart is already tagged. Can you fix your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71795215
user_5359 (2019-07-02 04:45:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. Also the Survival InnNode is a duplicate object (see the building)
DressyPear4 (2019-08-19 20:12:31+00:00): Revertido
Leo Slager (2019-07-01 18:57:38+00:00): Je gebruikt de Bing luchtfoto als achtergrond. Die ligt in NL vaak enkele tientallen meters verschoven ten opzichte van de werkelijkheid.
Het is beter om de pdok 25 cm luchtfoto's te gebruiken.
Leo Slager (2019-07-01 19:06:55+00:00): Als de editor iD zo een waarschuwing geeft, is het de moeite waard om even te onderzoeken wat je fout gedaan hebt.
In dit geval waren de 4e en 5e steiger aan de O-zijde niet met de doorgaande steiger verbonden, en routeerden niet.
ik heb het gecorrigeerd.
thijssu (2019-07-01 19:25:30+00:00): Oke bedankt
Glassman (2019-07-02 00:11:45+00:00): Question - is there a coffee shop inside of a burger king?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71795938
Sandgirl456 (2019-07-02 16:35:30+00:00): There is not. I thought I had moved the Newsroom coffee shop to it's actual location before adding the Burger King. I'll double check.
opendcc (2019-07-04 03:31:15+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und viel Spaß. Bei Taggen verwenden wir Attribute an den Objekten, um festzulegen, was es ist: also z.B. Highway=primary ist eine Bundesstraße. Das wird aber nicht als Name hingeschrieben, sondern eben der Straßenname ('Lindenstraße'). Ich vemute mal, dass die Straße nicht wirklich 'Abgabe Gartenabfälle' heißt, oder? Wäre nett, wenn Du das noch anpassen könntest.

Viele Grüße Wolfgang
Leo Slager (2019-07-01 19:15:11+00:00): Hier gaan verschillende dingen fout.
Probeer je in de wiki eerst in te lezen door bijvoorbeeld op te zoeken hoe je een highway=footway voorziet van de juiste tags.
In dit geval is foot=yes overbodig, een footway mag alleen door wandelaars gebruikt worden en dat is dus default.
access=yes suggereert dat ook alle andere verkeersdeelnemers daar mogen of kunnen komen en dat is niet het geval.
ik verbeter het even.
Leo Slager (2019-07-01 19:18:31+00:00): footway=sidewalk kan hier niet gebruikt worden. Het geeft aan dat er naast de rijbanen voor het snelverkeer een trottoir ligt voor de voetgangers en dat dat niet middels een separate way op de kaart staat.
Leo Slager (2019-07-01 19:21:11+00:00): Je zou ook een gelijkwaardige situatie kunnen opzoeken op de kaart om te kijken hoe dat getagd moet worden.

We nemen je overig niets kwalijk.
Iedereen maakt beginnersfouten en wij zijn ook zo begonnen.
Als er vragen zijn, stel ze rustig op het forum of via een PB aan mij.
DUGA (2021-07-30 16:09:52+00:00): What ford is that?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1358578616/
Andrea Musuruane (2019-07-08 10:25:26+00:00): Ciao. Perdonami ma non capisco bene cosa è stato fatto in questo changeset. Dai tag sembra sia (almeno in parte) un revert. Grazie, Andrea
fayor (2019-07-08 13:53:05+00:00): Ciao, ho corretto la posizione di alcuni svincoli lungo l'A19 e l'A29 e aggiunto alcuni viadotti dove mancavano. 
Nessun revert, la dicitura nell'etichetta del changeset deriva (immagino) dal fatto che poco prima avevo fatto un revert (gruppo di modifica 71786052) e non ho chiuso Josm.
user_5359 (2019-07-02 04:42:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
eggie (2021-03-23 14:44:39+00:00): Beste Stroet,

Wat bedoel je met  Voormalige De Zwanenburcht. Als de school hier niet meer zit kan die vermelding toch weg?

Kijk je nog een keer?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-23 15:07:35+00:00): De school heb ik omgetagd naar Dorpshuis De Zwanenburcht
Het zal vast niet meer 'Voormalige ' zijn... 
Gr eggie
Ars-UA (2019-07-01 19:13:26+00:00): Инфа с сайта http://martrans.gov.ua
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-07-02 16:16:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69299082, 69300119, 69300708, 69301338, 69301927, 69302216, 69302980, 69304182, 69311778, 69337058, 69341077, 69341435, 69342046, 69343654, 69344576, 69345079, 69346265, 69347065, 69347356, 69347529, 69349053, 69366656, 69367703, 69369125, 69369213, 69372875, 69375508, 69376152, 69376753, 69377401, 69377799, 69378119, 69379070, 69379814, 69478947, 69479762, 69479805, 69479865, 69479889, 69479966, 69480034, 69480130, 69480144, 69480246, 69480292, 69480354, 69480370, 69480421, 69480434, 69480560, 69480711, 69480724, 69480750, 69480810, 69480836, 69480863, 69481602, 69481613, 69481719, 69481763, 69481794, 69481832, 69481860, 69481885, 69481958, 69481974, 69482140, 69482238, 69482385, 69482493, 69482734, 69482862, 69482975, 69483079, 69483216, 69483379, 69483611, 69483720, 69486321, 69486657, 69486787, 69486964, 69487167, 69487240, 69487342, 69487515, 69488663, 69490732, 69491116, 69491809, 69492093, 69492201, 69492412, 69492762, 69492883, 69492924, 69492979, 69493327, 69493991, 69494083, 69494185, 69514702, 69514795, 69515556, 69518478, 69518568, 69518646, 69521313, 69521410, 69521532, 69521633, 69525395, 69528784, 69528903, 69529457, 69530115, 69588265, 69588601, 69591066, 69591091, 69591223, 69591443, 69591613, 69591809, 69592096, 70032713, 70038523, 70062320, 70062385, 70062625, 70063617, 70063697, 70063912, 70064034, 70065067, 70065275, 70065794, 70067025, 70072188, 70072304, 70074916, 70077337, 70077443, 70097912, 70100686, 70100816, 70100909, 70101003, 70104812, 70104905, 70109425, 70110598, 70110698, 70111320, 70111920, 70112095, 70112398.
SomeoneElse (2019-07-03 08:03:39+00:00): Due to a complication in the way that the revert scripts work, the actual reverts to be done from here are actually in a series of earlier changesets with the same comment, and a series of later ones starting at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71830791 .
DaveF (2019-07-02 16:51:40+00:00): Are you sure this access was blocked up?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104932797
CycleStreets (2019-07-02 17:02:24+00:00): Yes, there was definitely only one entrance to the Healing Fields from that side, and a continuous fence.
Leo Slager (2019-07-04 23:30:31+00:00): Ook buslijn 56 is weer gerepareerd.
user_3216889 (2019-07-01 21:39:10+00:00): Goed werk!
viloan (2019-07-01 20:13:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Rps333 (2019-07-12 19:51:20+00:00): I believe it is now open. I just drove over it. Collected OSC and Mapillary imagery. will upload in the next 45 days or so
CartographicChels (2019-07-12 16:32:23+00:00): Hey AlexLabrada, 
Many of the trunk_link segments in this changeset are classified incorrectly. Could you please fix these, thanks.  -CartographicChels
DaveF (2019-07-02 16:41:43+00:00): Hi
What does ... (route) represent?
CycleStreets (2019-07-02 17:04:11+00:00): The best way I could think to represent the informal but well-established routes through these fields. I don't think simply calling them by the name of the field makes sense, but happy to change it to something else if you have a suggestion.
Gazer75 (2019-07-02 16:52:47+00:00): Please don't name houses like that. This is more like a description, not a name. It is also a very personalized thing and that should not be in OSM.
letihu (2019-10-23 20:05:32+00:00): Was könnte den dieses
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613504855/history#map=15/50.2680/7.0921&layers=N
große Multipolygon darstellen?
letihu (2019-10-23 20:07:44+00:00): Es ist natürlich eine Relation. Aber sie einen  Sinn?
viloan (2019-07-01 21:01:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
A67-A67 (2019-07-02 12:06:02+00:00): Hallo Ladung,
In deze wijziging verwijder je informatie over de beveiliging van treinrails. Dit was correct getagd. Waarom heb je deze informatie verwijderd?
JJJWegdam (2019-07-02 13:01:08+00:00): Good afternoon,
This changeset removed train protection tags from railways in Rotterdam. The tags (like railway:etcs) are described on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging.

Please roll back this changeset and try to redo it without removing these tags.

Thank you in advance
aceman444 (2020-11-05 23:20:53+00:00): I'm not sure how you found out on your mtb that the road in Lovinobana Uderina isn't a tertiary road and that it has no number. Please do not remove road classifications and numbering randomly. Thanks.
jancib (2020-11-06 09:22:33+00:00): well, looks it was my mistake, thanks for correction
baptistemm (2019-07-02 06:28:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention vous avez modifié des éléments aussi hors de France, comme https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6530437082 par exemple.
Nmxosm (2019-07-02 06:59:29+00:00): Hello, 

you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3243072071 from amenity=fast_food to amenity=restaurant. Having a look at the wiki and including local knowledge, I think that amenity=fast_food was the correct tag.  

Suspecting that this has been a mechanical edit, it would be appropriate to have a proper changeset comment (every edit somehow is an "update") and link the required discussion (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F). 

Please revert changes from amenity=fast_food to amenity=restaurant, if local knowledge hasn't been included.

Thank you.
Nmxosm

-----------------------------------

Bonjour, 

vous avez changé https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3243072071 de amenity=fast_food à amenity=restaurant. En regardant le wiki et en incluant les connaissances locales, je pense que amenity=fast_food était la bonne étiquette.  

Soupçonnant qu'il s'agit d'une modification mécanique, il serait approprié d'avoir un commentaire approprié (chaque modification est en quelque sorte une "mise à jour") et de relier la discussion requise (voir https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct et https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F). 

S'il vous plaît, revenez aux changements de amenity=fast_food à amenity=restaurant, si les connaissances locales n'ont pas été prises en compte.

Je vous remercie.
Nmxosm

Traduit avec www.DeepL.com/Translator
Nmxosm (2019-07-03 06:57:41+00:00): Hello,

please answer the questions above, otherwise I will consider this an undiscussed and harmful mechanical edit and thus revert it.

Greetings Nmxosm

------------------------
Bonjour,

veuillez répondre aux questions ci-dessus, sinon je considérerai qu'il s'agit d'une modification mécanique non discutée et préjudiciable et je la renverrai donc.

Salutations Nmxosm
Traduit avec www.DeepL.com/Translator
chabe01 (2019-07-03 09:33:52+00:00): Hello,

I changed the tags as I followed the suggestions of iD as you can see here : https://osmlab.github.io/name-suggestion-index/index.html?k=amenity&v=restaurant#pizza-hut

Chabe01
freebeer (2019-07-03 12:36:03+00:00): the iD editor is known to be offering bad or totally wrong suggestions for a number of things.  many are based on cultural differences from the us-based developers.

a chain like pizza hut can never be a restaurant as i understand it.  fast food or even junk food, yes.
baptistemm (2019-07-03 13:12:58+00:00): While I agree the change is controversial, the wiki article about pizza hut does not enforce fast_food https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Chain_restaurants_and_stores_guide#Pizza_Hut
Nmxosm (2019-07-03 15:55:26+00:00): I share the opinion that this is controversial and thus should be discussed the same as every other mechanical edit before it is done. In the German wiki for amenity=fast_food (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food) Pizza Hut is an explicit example for this tag. I don't want to enforce either of amenity=fast_food or amenity=restaurant, but I oppose the generalisation in this changeset as it completely ignores the decisions made by locals.

Greetings Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2019-07-05 07:49:40+00:00): FYI: I've asked in the German forum for someone to do the revert, as it is too complex for me: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66714
Zaffo80 (2019-07-01 22:18:48+00:00): The road between two fences placed across the route is closed.
La stada tra le due reti è chiusa.
BCNorwich (2019-07-02 06:43:04+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Judging from your changeset comment wouldn't the area better be described as an allotment?  Anyway both an allotment and a park should be depicted as areas rather than points.

Regards Bernard.
Joseph E (2019-08-13 01:48:44+00:00): VLD081, thank you for adding way 71801342 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71801342/history) - it looks nicely mapped, though not complete yet. Did you use the facebook RapidID program for this one? Just checking.
Joseph Eisenberg
Wamena, Indonesia
Jeff Underwood (2019-08-15 19:16:58+00:00): Hey Joseph,

The way you linked seems to be incorrect so I'm not sure which road you are referring to.

All of our mapping efforts in Indonesia are using RapiD data though. Of course there is human validating as well as hand drawing plenty of missed areas. After the initial mapping we come through using JOSM to run more validation checks and blend together our task squares which is what this changeset is.

If you would like to try RapiD yourself, you can go to mapwith.ai and choose one of the start mapping options.

Hope you check it out :)
-Jeff
Joseph E (2019-08-16 08:20:24+00:00): Sorry, I think I meant to ask about this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70095657/history (I've edited it, but it was new in this changeset).
Would it be possible to add a tag to changesets that are created with RapidiD? This changeset says "created_by=JOSM/1.5 (15155 en)" not RapidiD, and the changeset comment is "adjusted and modified existing ways and tags to better fit digital globe imagery" which isn't really correct, since a several new roads were added, and RapidiD isn't mentioned. But I thought I should ask, because the HOT/HDM guys here in Indonesia said that they were using "import=yes" on ways that were found by the RapidiD program. 

 Thanks for clarifying that this was the case. It looks like the geometry recognition is quite good! Too bad there isn't any automated way to pick the correct highway class - this is quite hard for humans too. 

Perhaps there could be a special changeset tag for things found by RapidiD? Putting the import=yes tag on the individual OSM ways isn't a great idea, since anyone can change these (like me - I was deleting them because they seemed wrong, since the changesets all said "from DigitalGlobe imagery", which isn't an import in the normal sense. I'm leaving them alone now that I know what they are). A special changeset tag, or at least something in the changeset comment, would make it clearer.
Jeff Underwood (2019-08-16 16:18:03+00:00): Still not the right way in the link :)

But perhaps you meant this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700956583/history ?

If that is the case, it was a version 1 because the RapiD based way was split during this clean up changeset to add a bridge.

Our initial changesets will have RapiD as the created_by tag. You can view an example of one here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73360105 .

After the data is uploaded in RapiD we clean up the area with JOSM as it works better for large scale cleanup and validation. Generally, this cleanup involves some splitting and merging so you might some version 1 features, but largely the work should be done in the RapiD changeset. So you will see changesets using both RapiD and JOSM spread throughout.

I agree that import=yes is a slight misnomer though. When we began this work a few years ago in Thailand, the concept of AI assisted mapping wasn't really well understood yet so we used the term import as it was the closest analog.  However, we consider it a fairly temporary tag that can be removed as people further enhance the data over time. It was just important that we properly marked our data for people to see exactly what was ours.

Thanks again for the feedback!
-Jeff
Joseph E (2019-08-18 13:59:57+00:00): Re: "we consider it a fairly temporary tag that can be removed as people further enhance the data over time"

Good to know. But I've gotten different advice from some of the HOT guys from Jakarta, Indonesia. They asked me not to remove the tags, even if I had edited the way and reviewed it, for at least the next few months, until their project is complete in November. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72632172 - last comment from Iko IRM-ED at the bottom.
Jeff Underwood (2019-08-23 21:27:25+00:00): Ah, I can talk to them and let them know that it's ok for community members to remove it when they do further editing. 

We run through our projects after completing all of the tasks and do cleanup on the whole area so keeping import=yes on a road will help us identify our work during that process, which is why they asked you to keep it for now. However, if you are happy with the road as is, feel free to remove the tag.

-Jeff
Glassman (2019-07-02 00:16:36+00:00): Tip: Square buildings by selecting the outline then type a "q"  to help improve the quality of OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71801456
datendelphin (2019-07-14 20:03:26+00:00): Du hast dich in der Richtung vertan. Ich nehme an du beziehst dich auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/994350
Die Notitz war wohl etwas ungenau eingezeichnet. Die Beschränkung auf 70 ist neu, das stimmt, aber von Zug in Richtung Luzern. Das war auch bereits eingetragen. Dieser Abschnitt ist immer noch 80. Hab ich in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72241340 korrigiert
Und die obligate Mahnung: geo.admin.ch ist praktisch immer eine Urheberrechtsverletzung! Für dieses changeset sicher nicht erlaubt.
elBlanco (2019-07-14 23:04:00+00:00): Okee danke für die Berichtigung
Glassman (2019-07-02 00:17:39+00:00): Tip: When outlining buildings, watchout for peaks. They look like they extend out, but only because the satellite is not directly overhead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71801541
TravGW (2019-07-01 23:50:13+00:00): Do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated.
Glassman (2019-07-02 00:23:11+00:00): Tip: check out different imagery - The house may show up there. Use the layer icon on the right side of the editor for available imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71801684
Glassman (2019-07-02 00:20:44+00:00): Landuse=residential is intended to cover the entire area, not just a house. Use building=house instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71801700
archie (2019-07-01 22:44:15+00:00): Du vet att det du håller på med är vandalism?
archie (2019-07-01 22:58:25+00:00): Var vänlig läs igenom hjälpsidorna ordentligt innan du raderar någonting som fortfarande finns på satelitbilderna. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sv:Beginners%27_guide
archie (2019-07-01 23:02:21+00:00): Beskriv i din kommentar vad du konkret har gjort, speciellt om du har raderat något och anledningen till att du har raderat något, tack.
Constable (2019-07-02 14:22:51+00:00): Hi there, "Mailand: Cornaredo" doesn't really tell much about your edit.
Could you please use proper changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thanks
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-07-02 01:38:38+00:00): can you explain why there's 3 lanes here? https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/499150145
flylow (2019-07-04 14:45:26+00:00): Maybe, I did change the wrong thing and I should have removed the `oneway=yes`, instead of adjusting the lanes. Something was definitely wrong with the tagging of the way.
marc__marc (2019-12-21 21:06:53+00:00): Hello,
thanks for the update.
can you draw the scope of the whole tourism=camp_site ? does it have 3 tourism=camp_pitch ? (you update one of them but not the 2 others)
regards
user_5359 (2019-07-02 15:12:58+00:00): Hello! Please notice the correct writing of the tag "torism=camp_pitch" is "tourism=camp_pitch". I will modify this (in one big update). Other comment: I am sure, that the name isn't "Hiker-Biker Campsite (approximate)". The name is "Hiker-Biker Campsite". You can add a key description with the value "position is approximate"
bhousel (2019-07-02 15:43:15+00:00): Oh, this looks like a bug in iD 2.15.3
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6608

I'll release an update soonish and we can cleanup all the misspellings.
HindmarshSquare (2019-07-08 04:13:33+00:00): Hi tastrax, I appreciate your effort of improving the Victoria Lake boundary. It looks like the imagery you cited here was low resolution which resulted in an offset from the more updated imagery. Can you take a look? Also, I think you met my co-worker Andrew Wiseman at the Red Cross mapathon at the State of the Map Oceania in Melbourne last year, does that sound familiar?