piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AymOSM (2015-02-16 19:59:19+00:00): Habe den HS sicher nicht mit Absicht verschoben, bin vermutlich beim Herumschieben der Karte auf den zugehörigen Weg und HS gekommen. Werde künftig vorsichtiger sein, danke für den Hinweis!
VG Ay
surveyor54 (2015-02-17 09:04:57+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-16 22:23:52+00:00): Kuźwa, mógłbyś nie psuć granic administracyjnych? Nie ogarniasz tematu i rysujesz jakieś farmazony.
cartinus (2015-04-20 16:13:19+00:00): Why do you tag both tracks of a dual tracked railway line with lanes=2 and tracks=2, when both tracks are mapped? To me this means that there are now four tracks according to OSM, which is of course not true in reality.
Reclus (2015-02-16 10:42:35+00:00): Warum in aller Welt werden korrekt und sinnvoll gesetzte Tags gelöscht?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:noexit

So hast du auch noch zusätzliche Fehlermeldungen von Keep Right erzeugt, da Keep Right nahe an anderen Wegen endende Wege anmeckert.

http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?lat=51.41639&lon=7.27543&zoom=19&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
peter9999 (2015-02-16 16:10:58+00:00): War ein Versehen, das ich bereits rückgängig gemacht habe.
Hjart (2015-02-16 08:11:09+00:00): Er Uglestien virkelig steps/trin/trapper?
chlor (2015-02-16 10:16:09+00:00): 5m af stien ved Hareskovvej er trapper, resten er asfalt. Kørestol er noget besværlig at få hen over.
Hjart (2015-02-16 10:39:47+00:00): Ok, tak for svaret. På GDS kan asfalten ses, men på grund af bevoksning ud mod Hareskovvej kan det ikke ses om der er asfalt hele vejen. Jeg har ændret stykket, så jeg ikke kommer i tvivl igen :)
robert (2015-02-16 01:09:20+00:00): May I suggest the historic=castle tag for this?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcastle
tosky (2015-02-16 00:22:03+00:00): Benvenuto! Mi raccomando le maiuscole (per Via):
Via del Sole
Via Selva
ecc
(non sono sicuro per le maiuscole in "Via due casette")
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-02-25 06:08:26+00:00): Does the bicycle repair station really charge money?  If so is it really a shop, or a standalone 24/7 outdoor repair stand?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-22 18:18:24+00:00): I'm guessing that the extra "g" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108048515/history is a typo?
will_p (2015-02-22 18:53:35+00:00): Yes, a typo. Now corrected.
robert (2015-02-16 01:06:44+00:00): You haven't tagged these (presumably) buildings, so OSM doesn't really know what they are. As far as OSM's concerned they're just generic areas.
You need to select the areas and then choose a tag from the menu on the left hand side of the screen.
4rch (2015-02-20 13:50:52+00:00): Hi, please take a look at the following boundaries:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4525204
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4525209
Both boundaries are invalid and you seem to be the last editor
ulrichm (2015-02-20 14:03:55+00:00): Many thanks. Both have been corrected!
dsr15 (2015-02-16 01:56:01+00:00): pedestrian path
naoliv (2015-02-20 00:29:52+00:00): LucFreitas, toda instituição de ensino superios (Faculdade, Centro Universitário, Universidade) é amenity=university no OSM. Isso inclui os Institutos Federais que possuem cursos superiores.
amenity=college é destinado apenas para escolas de nível técnico (ou cursos profissionalizantes).
naoliv (2015-02-20 00:30:16+00:00): *superior (errei ali no "superios")
LucFreitas (2015-02-20 00:52:05+00:00): Está corrigido, naoliv. Obrigado por me avisar.
naoliv (2015-02-20 00:54:15+00:00): Tem esse também: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3353320656
:-)
LucFreitas (2015-02-20 00:58:08+00:00): Só uma observação: o JOSM algumas vezes confunde o usuário com a tradução (o que aconteceu aqui). Vou sugerir a comunidade a tradução.
naoliv (2015-02-20 00:59:06+00:00): No JOSM eu arrumei isso. Acho que só vai sair a correção na próxima versão estável dele.
LucFreitas (2015-02-20 01:15:36+00:00): Agora sim, os dados estão corrigidos (me confundi no último envio). Novamente, obrigado.
naoliv (2015-02-20 01:19:00+00:00): Se ver alguma outra coisa errada no JOSM, dá um aviso pra gente corrigir.
Abraço!
LucFreitas (2015-02-20 01:24:51+00:00): Ok, naoliv.
Abraço!
rickmastfan67 (2015-02-25 05:38:43+00:00): abbafei, to be honest, I'm not sure that most of these changes should have been made.  I-279 is clearly a bridge over Reedsdale Street, thus, I don't think qualifies for the 'covered=yes' tag.

On the wiki page itself for the 'covered=yes' tag, it says "When should NOT be used:

    on a highway passing under a bridge, where the path of the under-passing highway may be accurately assumed."

That's pretty much the entire case here for all of your changes in this changeset.  I would recommend a full revert of this changeset.
shravan91 (2015-02-16 04:42:04+00:00): The comment for changeset is : Fixed an unconnected major road
FraukeLeo (2020-10-15 07:19:44+00:00): Tach Ole! Ich hab die Namen mal wieder weggenommen. Namen von Wanderrouten gehören nicht als Namen an die dazu gehörenden Wege, wenn nicht wirklich die Wege selbst so heißen. Die Route ist schon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3846554 erfasst.
shravan91 (2015-02-16 06:26:17+00:00): The comment for the changeset is : "fixed unconnected major road"
maraf24 (2015-03-30 11:45:22+00:00): Zdecydowanie wolałbym, by błędy z keeprighta dotyczące przecinania się rzek i dróg nie były likwidowane na jedno kopyto - jako przepusty.
Akurat tutaj była kładka.
Supaplex (2015-02-16 10:30:09+00:00): hi 你好
一般補習班是標amenity=prep_school，而不是amenity=school
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-02-23 19:48:23+00:00): Is Banaweer bicycles a bicycle shop, or a 24/7 bicycle repair station?  Seems like a shop!
Sarvihepo (2015-02-24 07:25:19+00:00): I thought it was more appropriate to tag it as a repair station, perhaps one could tag the nearby showroom as a shop or tag the backside garage as both...
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-02-24 07:37:21+00:00): How about two nodes.  One for the shop/showroom, one for the bike repair.
Hjart (2015-02-16 11:57:55+00:00): Har du noget med kommunen i Haderslev at gøre?
GIS Haderslev (2015-02-16 13:07:20+00:00): Je det har jeg. Jeg har boet i kommunen og arbejder med GIS under Teknik og Miljø udvalget
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-23 18:20:48+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3954958 ?
Klumbumbus (2015-02-17 23:06:45+00:00): Hallo,
du hast die Gornsdorfer Straße von highway=unclassified zu highway=tertiary geändert. highway=unclassified bedeutet nicht, dass die Straße unkategorisiert ist, sondern es bezeichnet Ortsverbindungsstraßen mit niedriger Bedeutung, was hier der Fall ist. siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=unclassified

VG
Klumbumbus
_al (2015-02-17 08:05:47+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge!

Kleiner Hinweis: einen Hydranten taggt man mit [emergency=fire_hydrant](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant).

Weiterhin viel Spaß mit OSM!

Servus, Andreas
Warin61 (2018-12-04 03:16:48+00:00): Hi,
On Ways  328539700, 328539699, and in another change set 2 more ways as well you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
Marabu_Too (2018-12-05 07:24:31+00:00): I think it's debatable which description would be better; driving past, the areas looked to me to have a hedge like purpose, so I tended towards "landuse"; but, as it's perfectly possible to argue for "natural" as well, I have made the changes.
dudka (2015-02-16 14:03:48+00:00): what actions have been done by your script? did you describe your script anywhere?
Spaudikas (2015-02-22 07:49:53+00:00): script rules is based on published rules of xybot. Additionally script corrects some errors having codes 220,360 from keepright.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-22 09:34:52+00:00): @Spaudikas Mechanical edits (especially wide-ranging ones like this) do need to be discussed with the community first.  See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/603 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/604 .
salix01 (2015-02-16 12:46:17+00:00): Habe mir erlaubt den way #328549098 wieder rauszunehmen, da er doppelt war in der Relation "Steinhuder Meer"
jotpe (2015-02-16 15:57:02+00:00): Kann man machen. Aber wenn, dann alle addr:* Tags auf den Eingang verschieben. Gruß Johannes
robert (2015-03-05 02:05:43+00:00): Did you mean to switch the name= on Passmore Edwards Court to an addr:housename=? This has broken a match: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=907839
Mike Baggaley (2015-03-06 00:17:25+00:00): oops, I think it should be OK now
Nakaner (2015-03-15 09:52:25+00:00): So ein Poller (oder auch Tore oder Cattlegrids) müssen Teil des Weges sein und nicht als lose Nodes daneben liegen. Sonst haben sie keinen Einfluss auf das Routing.
GOwin (2015-02-16 13:16:25+00:00): Sorry about the large bbox. Made a correction in another area, while doing another from somewhere else.
friedl (2015-02-16 17:03:02+00:00): Hallo gosausee,
Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass du auf Grund von Konflikten meine gestrigen Änderungen wieder gelöscht hast.
Dennoch:
1. Bei addr:city halte ich "Kirchdorf am Inn" für viel passender (wird auch in sämtlichen Firmenanschriften verwednet).
2. Bei ein paar Adressen glaube ich, dass meine Gebäudezuordnung richtig ist und nicht die von geoimage.at.
Hjart (2015-07-13 04:48:40+00:00): At fjerne amenity=recycling fra en genbrugsplads er da vist ikke det mest heldige "fix"
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-16 23:36:14+00:00): Przypominam o poprawnych schemacie tagowania adresów: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-16 23:36:59+00:00): "314 B" -> "314B" (bez spacji).
maraf24 (2015-02-17 00:01:17+00:00): opening_hours=Mo-Fr 05:00-19:00; Sa 08:00-13:00

Dokładnie tak - po angielsku, z zerem i w jednym tagu a nie dwóch.
Adam_Piszczek (2015-02-17 21:41:37+00:00): dzięki za informacje
radekkaba (2015-05-20 20:04:46+00:00): Mógłby kolega podać, jakieś źródło tych "rewelacji"? Łącznik (i przebudowa ul. Staropoznańskiej) właśnie został prawie wybudowany w takiej geometrii. Jedynie ciągi piesze i rowerowe przy ul. Staropoznańskiej uległy korekcie względem pierwotnego projektu.
mmahmud (2021-01-31 05:54:41+00:00): Hi, none of the imagery are showing that this road exists or crosses the river. Can you confirm?
Here is the way link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48636945#map=15/-4.7553/17.5612
NickJOB (2021-01-31 18:07:29+00:00): Hi, as far as I can see from the history of the way, I didn't create it, I just changed the tag from highway=road to highway=unclassified to be more in keeping with highway tagging in this area.
The actual geometry was drawn by user:moyogo in 2010.
I can't be certain about this case exactly but in 2010 there were still a lot of areas in this part of the country that didn't have high-resolution imagery available so it seems quite likely to me that this should probably now be updated to the new imagery.
Hope that helps you!
mmahmud (2021-02-01 13:21:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for responding. I will follow up with the person who created the road and update accordingly.
rasmusv (2015-03-02 18:44:43+00:00): Hej Niels. Jeg har ændret den sekundære til tertiær. Jeg kommer der en gang imellem og der er intet som peger på det her stykke her ref=155 og derved er en større kommunevej. Se også http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/313172
zstadler (2018-01-25 07:54:46+00:00): Hello WillRock41,
.
By the way, in this 3-year old changeset you have added "access=no" to this section of King George street, Jerusalem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230894177
.
I assume this street is open to pedestrians and bicycles, so I changed it to "motor_vehicle=no". Please let me know if this is incorrect.
.
Thanks,
Ze'ev
zstadler (2018-01-25 08:01:51+00:00): Is it also true for these sections:
.
King George street
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88829902
.
Strauss street
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4722262
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313735825
.
Yehezkel street
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134936374
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273011359
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273011364
?
GerdP (2015-11-13 16:34:51+00:00): please review:
It seems you wanted to create a 
type=multipolygon relation, but something went wrong.
See my changes to fix this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35288112
Witzkito (2015-02-19 11:43:31+00:00): Hola Hernan!!

¿Que paso por acá? La rotonda esta, se construyo hace poco, pero es muy pequeña como para trazarla completa.

Saludos!!
Hernan (2015-02-19 13:33:37+00:00): Hola!
Si, la borre, pero la volví a poner como estaba enseguida. Lo que le cambie es la dirección de circulación, porque en Argentina suele ser en sentido contrario a las agujas del reloj y estaba en sentido a las agujas del reloj. Pero la rotonda sigue estando. El sentido era correcto como estaba?
Saludos
Witzkito (2015-02-19 19:02:45+00:00): No, tenes razon, es anti horario como en todos lados. No me percate de ello.

Gracias!!
Hernan (2015-02-19 19:13:58+00:00): Gracias a vos :)
sagar falke (2015-02-16 15:09:53+00:00): its a small canal which meets the wardha river
MKnight (2016-03-16 20:33:28+00:00): Die Treppe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261594401 führt ins Leere.
patzi (2016-03-21 11:26:09+00:00): jetzt ist sie verbunden
scruss (2018-01-26 21:40:49+00:00): What was your source, please? If this was an import of the Edmonton data, its licence isn't approved for use in OSM
scai (2015-02-16 18:15:15+00:00): Hi Lulau. Schön, dass du fehlende Gebäude eingetragen hast. Der Schwarzburger Hof ist nun leider doppelt eingetragen. Löschst du den einzelnen Punkt? Es reicht, wenn die Merkmale am Gebäude stehen.
dktue (2022-02-03 14:45:45+00:00): Hallo, ich habe gesehen, dass Du tatsächlich bereits von langer Zeit den Autobahnabschnitt ("ref:section") erfasst hast.

Kennst Du schon
http://autobahnkilometer.bayern
? Dort tauchen Deine Abschnitte nämlich auf. :-)
emacsen (2015-02-17 12:49:00+00:00): Congratulations on your first edits to OSM!
Hjart (2015-07-15 06:55:27+00:00): Please be aware that roads and paths must be properly connected as explained in fig. 5 here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1
mstriewe (2015-06-26 19:17:23+00:00): Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3354499940 in this changeset is tagged with "bicycle=d". What does that mean?
DnaX (2015-07-01 14:28:14+00:00): Was an error. Now I correct with bicycle=designated.

Thank you!
seabound122 (2015-02-16 21:08:18+00:00): Well, thanks for removing my edits that weren't "from testing an app".
malenki (2015-02-16 21:32:37+00:00): Sorry if I removed valid data. I could restore it if you would you explain why OSM needs e.g. in total 12 nodes with "name=Mexico City" and nothing else?

And if all these changes are made with  	from a new user who registered yesterday and uses Pushpin iOS – what else one could assume?
Peter Dobratz (2015-05-11 14:30:59+00:00): What prompted you to change this?  Please check the OSM history on objects before making changes like this.  Send a message to the person making the change before undoing their work.
I made the edit to call this SW 14th Avenue and I was just riding by this area on my bike the other day and I happened to take a picture of the SW 14th Ave street sign.
Ryan_Peterson (2015-05-11 14:48:03+00:00): Sorry Peter, should have consulted with you/looked at the history.  I was looking for mismatched names (between the city and OSM)   It just seemed like an odd transition for a single street to change 3 times  in one corner so I thought it may have been a mistake.  Anyways I will change it back since you have actually verified it.  Once again sorry about this.
Peter Dobratz (2015-05-11 15:10:03+00:00): I took a break in my bike ride over the weekend to walk around the area starting on SW Gibbs St walking from SW 12th Ave and continuing up the hill.  Somewhere in the bend of the road there's a street sign which shows the "corner" of SW Gibbs St and SW 14th Ave.  There are a few houses which actually have addresses on SW 14th Ave and some Water facilities which have addresses on their signs of "3423 SW 14th Avenue" and "SW 1th Avenue & SW Marquam Hill Road".  When I get a chance later this week, I plan on editing this area in detail and I might change the exact point that the road transitions names.
Ryan_Peterson (2015-05-11 15:22:17+00:00): I took a look in streetview ,just because I was curious.  I was able to find the sign- If you are driving away from OHSU on Gibbs, its right on the corner after you pass the “The Hill House” and before the water facilities
Peter Dobratz (2015-05-11 21:47:38+00:00): I updated the map data around here.  Based on the street signs I think it makes sense to have the road transition from Gibbs to 14th to Marquam Hill Road.  The only odd thing is the house at 3326 SW Marquam Hill Road, which is only accessed via 13th Avenue:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344368432
robert (2015-02-16 19:34:16+00:00): Good start - keep it up. All v. useful additions.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-17 10:07:35+00:00): Just wondered - is there perhaps a typo here at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3354591529 ("Buckminser shop" without a T in "Buckminster" with one)?
Nakaner (2015-02-18 13:43:48+00:00): Kannst du mir mal bitte erklären, warum du bei der Haltestelle Durchlacher Tor/KIT Campus Süd den Haltestellen-Node als wheelchair=limited getaggt hast? Die Station ist teilweise barrierefrei, weshalb wheelchair=no schlicht und einfach falsch ist. Siehe auch das wheelchair:description=*-Tag an diesem Node. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3244816169 Ich habe es korrigiert.
Nakaner (2015-02-18 13:45:29+00:00): Außerdem wäre ich über eine Erklärung erfreut, warum du die Bahnsteige an dieser Haltestelle mit wheelchair=yes getaggt hast. Sollte ich keine Begründung von dir erhalten, werde ich auch diese Änderung revertieren.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 16:15:43+00:00): Hello!

You used
man_made=Quay
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328644871/history

Have you maybe meant
man_made=quay
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
ratrun (2015-02-17 18:42:36+00:00): This change looks very suspicous. You seem to be a new user. Do you mind if I revert your change? I can't believe that they moved the primary road into the sea.
Hjart (2015-02-17 11:22:48+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at tegne bygningerne på og overføre tags til dem
jotpe (2015-02-17 05:00:32+00:00): Das ging flott. Vor Ort auch geprüft?
Hjart (2015-02-17 11:33:34+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at justere på disse og lave diverse tilføjelser. Bemærk at der i forvejen var cycleway=track tags på selve bilvejen, hvilket gør at der kommer dobbelte cykelstier på cykelkortet, hvis ikke de fjernes når der laves separate cykelveje. Til folk der mapper cykelstier i Danmark anbefales det at læse http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning.
Hjart (2015-02-17 11:47:04+00:00): Du kunne måske forsøge dig med "havecenter"?

Nu har jeg kun meget begrænset erfaring med iD (webeditoren), men i JOSM er man ikke bundet af forudbestemte tags og kan endda opfinde sine egne.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-02-23 20:01:35+00:00): Is Spiele a bicycle shop with repair, 
or a 24/7 free bicycle repair stand?
gabe1986 (2015-02-24 03:38:55+00:00): Is a bicycle shop with repair
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-02-24 04:36:39+00:00): The bicycle_repair_station tag is for standalone, free, 24/7 repair stands.  Use shop=bicycle plus repair tags for a shop.
gabe1986 (2015-02-25 16:58:01+00:00): Thanks. I've already made this change.
emacsen (2015-02-16 22:05:01+00:00): Eurgene,

You're making huge numbers of massive changes. Please make meaningful changeset comments on these changes so that others can follow what you're doing.
Osm1980 (2018-08-09 16:37:51+00:00): salam be jaye neveshtan ertefa dakhele parantez dakhele tage name az tag ele estefadeh konid chon dakhele parantez neveshtan too tage name eshtebah ast
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=peak?uselang=en
maraf24 (2015-03-13 12:16:15+00:00): Spotkałem się już z drogami zamkniętymi dla ruchu wszelkiego, które były redundantnie otagowane jako access=no + motor_vehicle=no. 
Ten changeset otworzył je dla pieszych.
Wydaje mi się, że lepiej było dać FIXME.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-13 12:51:28+00:00): ale konkretny przykład jakiś?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-13 15:45:37+00:00): chodzi mi o to, czy jest jakieś konkretne miejsce w którym popsułem, czy tylko opierasz się na opisie changesetu?
maraf24 (2015-03-13 18:02:37+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293933129
Teren wodonośny z zakazami wstępu. 
Fakt, że tagowanie nie było najlepsze, bo powinno być jak teraz dałem access=private, ale chyba też nie było błędne?
Wcześniej miałem też przypadek highway=residential (to chyba inny changeset zmienił, komentarz miał podobny) mający motor_vehicle=no, który po rozpoczęciu remontu wyłączyłem poprzez access=no. Fakt, że lepiej było dać highway=construction (i tak potem dałem), ale też droga ta była przez jakiś czas tylko ogrodzona płotkami a nie fizycznie w remoncie.
I dlatego uważam, że takie drogi z usunietym access=no należałoby dodatkowo oznaczyć - fixme czy uwagą - by można je było łatwo odnaleźć zweryfikować.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-14 00:59:37+00:00): Hmm, ale czy teraz ta droga 293933129  jest otagowana poprawnie? Bo po mojej zmianie, nie mogły na nią wjeżdzać rowery i samochody (ale mogli np. piesi), a teraz to nie wiadomo kto może. Jeśli piesi tam mogą wchodzi to dodałbym tam foot=yes.
maraf24 (2015-03-14 09:01:19+00:00): Teren jest oznaczony jako niedostępny dla każdego za wyjątkiem posiadających zezwolenie. Nie wiem jaka jest moc prawna tego zakazu, bo teren nie jest ogrodzony. 
Zastanawiam sie teraz, czy tagi highway=unclassified i access=private się nie gryzą. Drogą unclassified to ona była 10 lat temu, teraz jest chyba formalnie drogą wewnętrzną wodociągów i powinien być to service.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-14 12:08:50+00:00): Chyba tak, highway=service byłby odpowiedniejszy z racji przeznaczenia tej drogi jak i małej rangi tej drogi. Co do access=private - po przedstawieniu sprawy myślę, że teraz jest ok.
Pozdrawiam
Baloo Uriza (2015-02-17 04:26:03+00:00): Reverting this change as it's brigning nothing to the table.  Check the wiki for the right way to do whatever it was you were trying to do.
kayle (2015-02-17 08:59:53+00:00): Ahoj, ako prvé vitaj v OSM. Jedna otázka na križovatku ciest 590 a 501006 s miestnou komunikáciou. Aktuálne to je ako by išla miestna komunikácia stredom. Podľa bing podkladu to vyzerá na obyčajnú križovatku bez ostrovčekov. Pýtam sa ako to je v skutočnosti, slo by posunúť spoj 590 a 501006 aby sa tam dala pripojiť miestna komunikácia. Odbočovať by sa dalo a nebola by tam  komplikovaná križovatka
kayle (2015-02-17 09:06:05+00:00): A ešte jedna vec, prosím ťa, keď ukladáš zmeny na mape, vyplň text čo si upravoval/pridával. Lepšie sa v tom potom dá orientovať. Ďakujem.
tulci (2015-02-17 09:12:15+00:00): Ahoj, mas pravdu, tie ostrovceky tam skutocne nie su. Pre taketo riesenie som sa rozhodol po tom ako som krizovatkou prechadzal a odbocil z 590 od Studienky na 501006. Pri povodnom zakresleni ma navigacia posielala rovno do domu naproti krizovatke. V skutocnosti ide jednu velku asfaltovu plochu, kde sa zbiehaju 4 cesty a je tazke spravne urcit jeden jediny bod v ktorom sa stretavaju tak aby vyhovoval navigacii zo vsetkych smerov. Pevne verim, ze toto zakreslenie zapricini, ze navigacne pokyny budu presnejsie.
tulci (2015-02-17 09:13:01+00:00): Diky za upozornenie, budem pri komentovani zmien doslednejsi.
PT-53 (2021-11-04 11:06:01+00:00): Hallo MrWebber,
ich bin auf dieses Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250027931/history
gestoßen, das Du mit
name=Calambau
versehen hast.
Was soll das sein?
Fragende Grüße