piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adikso (2022-11-09 10:21:42+00:00): Problem polega na tym, że "proposed:" nie służy do składania propozycji, tylko wskazuje, że istnieją aktywne plany dodania tych konkretnych drzew. Przykładowo byłby jakiś już gotowy projekt ustalony na poziomie miasta.
kubahahaha (2022-11-09 12:01:55+00:00): Jest finansowanie, teraz we współpracy z mieszkańcami wybierane są lokalizację - wydawało mi się że to wystarczająco na proposed

https://lifeinkrakow.pl/w-miescie/5022,co-najmniej-sto-polamanych-drzew-specjalna-pomoc-dla-os-podwawelskiego
Adikso (2022-11-09 12:11:47+00:00): Bardziej by pasował umap do takich zastosowań, a proposed na OSM jak już zostanie ustalone w jakim miejscu.
kubahahaha (2022-11-09 12:16:07+00:00): Z formalnych rzeczy - jest jakiś harmonogram czasowy, określenie górnego limitu liczby drzew, osoby które to ogarniają.
Tutaj chcieliśmy zdigitalizować wybrane lokalizacje, które teraz oznaczone są na papierze. Nie znaczy to że na 100% dokładnie w tych miejscach będą drzewa- ale wydaje mi się że to już wystarczająco żeby zaznaczyć takie właśnie plany - które będziemy monitorować do zakończenia realizacji.
kwiatek_123 (2022-11-09 14:59:39+00:00): Jeśli wiadomo, że drzewa zostaną posadzone w wybranych przez mieszkańców miejscach (nie więcej), miejsca zostały ustalone wcześniej na papierze i jest opiekun, który będzie w razie potrzeby aktualizował położenia to ja nie widzę większych przeciwskazań aby do mapy je dodać jako proposed.
Matija Nalis (2022-11-11 17:47:19+00:00): Venko, potrgao si multipolygon i cijela šuma je nestala desetinama kilometara uokrug Ogulina. Vedran_V je popravio u slijedećim changesetima, ali bih te molio da nam se javiš na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/venkov-vandalizam/5299/4?u=matija_nalis oko tog i drugih problema sa tvojim kartiranjem, kako bi dogovorili kako da dalje surađujemo.
Venko (2022-11-14 13:16:07+00:00): mislim da je puko zbog edit wara koji je na njemu počeo, ja sam se odmsknuo i posvetio divljenju tzv "ispravcima Venkovog sranja - vandalism removal"
Venko (2022-11-14 13:25:59+00:00): I inače rendereri znaju imat problema s velikim multipoligonima, na zoom levelima 13 i iznad se čudno ponaša i onaj jugoistočno od A1
MxxCon (2022-11-09 10:25:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb looks to be quiet matching as well
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128659386
EnumMapper (2022-11-09 21:33:43+00:00): True. But if we have to choose between borough and suburb (without considering default carto rendering), I guess most people would prefer borough.
jmapb (2022-11-10 17:12:10+00:00): I've reverted this with changeset 128743390. EnumMapper, please discuss with the local community before changing one well-established accurate tag for another based on a guess. Thanks, J
EnumMapper (2022-11-10 20:10:18+00:00): OK. Thanks for letting me know.
mueschel (2022-11-24 11:00:34+00:00): Hi,
the tag 'moped_p' was replaced by 'speed_pedelec' a while ago. Could you check your edits for this?
vbombaerts (2022-11-24 12:43:04+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for pointing this error to me. It actually comes from the use of the JOSM RoadSign plugin where these values are still in use. Can you make it changed maybe ?
vbombaerts (2022-11-24 12:52:07+00:00): @mueschel Hi,
Thanks for pointing this error to me. It actually comes from the use of the JOSM RoadSign plugin where these values are still in use. Can you make it changed maybe ?
mueschel (2022-11-24 13:41:43+00:00): I left a note on the discussion page in the wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/RoadSigns
woodpeck (2022-11-10 16:16:38+00:00): What does "None-70" mean?
Carfran79 (2022-11-12 13:39:50+00:00): It was probably generated automatically on Monday I check
woodpeck (2022-11-15 14:17:36+00:00): I am not sure what you mean by "probably automatically generated". If this is a process that automatically uploads data to OSM without supervision then it needs to follow our data import guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
geoccitania (2022-11-26 18:53:53+00:00): Amic, grandmercé per ta contribucion a la Mapa occitana. Bensai que o sabes pas encara mai l’IEO a publicat lo promier GPS occitan amb OsmAnd. Trobaràs d’entresenhas sus la pagina Facebook Geoccitania. I a tanben de tèmas MapContrib per l’occitan ( de recercar  "oc " Amb l’espavi vueje!)  Amistats
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128659897
wolfbert (2026-03-02 10:33:46+00:00): Hallo, weshalb bekam der Pfad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114555963 hier layer=-1 (= Untergrund)?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-02 17:42:05+00:00): Kertemindegade is not motor_vehicle=no.

Motor vehicles just cannot enter from Strandboulevarden.

I have corrected it.
AsgerFrank (2023-02-03 12:45:06+00:00): BUT the length of Kertemindegade  still wears the tag motor_vehicle=no 
- must be anoverlooked mistake. Aerial image displays plenty of cars.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-02-04 21:27:29+00:00): Yes.
 I have removed the motor_vehicle=no
Lauxsin (2023-02-06 23:35:12+00:00): Hello, thank you for pointing this out and making the updated fix. Happy Mapping!
AndrewS (2022-11-11 03:02:48+00:00): Hi Mapper47,
I am wondering why this path was deleted. It may cross private land, but as the path exists and people use it then I would tend to follow the advice found here:   https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
 which suggests to mark the path as access=private. That way it is clear to mappers and users it is private.
Mapper47 (2022-11-11 13:35:07+00:00): Having read the information that you provided, I agree that this path should have been made acess=private rather than deleted. It was removed with the aim of preventing the public from thinking that they can use the path, but setting to private would probably be a better solution.
Hoàng Tuấn Việt (2022-11-13 01:33:57+00:00): Cho mình hỏi tại sao lại revert nhỉ?
Tommybara (2022-11-14 01:39:47+00:00): Hi bạn! Lý do mình revert là vì bản đồ bạn vẽ sai với thực tế. Mặc dù theo quy hoạch thì tương lai khu kinh tế Đình Vũ - Cát Hải sẽ tiếp tục lấn ra biển, tuy nhiên hiện nay thì chưa lấn ra hết mà bạn lại vẽ vào là sai.
mcliquid (2022-11-09 15:57:06+00:00): Hi, gerne mal durchlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:comment
marczoutendijk (2022-11-09 10:07:10+00:00): Hello,
In this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111642208
you used the name=building tag for an isolated dwelling.
That is not correct. 
I changed it and moved the node for the isolated_dwelling inside the group of houses.
But you should give a name to that isolated dwelling (name=building is not correct).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
ybungalobill (2022-11-09 17:18:55+00:00): why do you delete Lafayette Street and part of Coolidge Street?
elmorobike (2022-11-09 17:46:10+00:00): I deleted a drawn building error. I didn't delete Lafayette Street or Coolidge Street or at least not intentionally. I do recall removing a point on Main Street dropped in error while attempting to move the map. If that caused a deletion of a street...that action did not appear on my screen...then apologies. I did rename, per your request, the Dollar General. I also adjusted that roof/building footprint to hopefully better capture the building's footprint. As to your comment that "we don't...roof...", that is an impossible ask if all one has are satellite imagery at a nadir angle of which 99% or more of the image is the roof and not the building footprint. Hence, you're speaking as if someone has a picture of the building's footprint with which to draw from in addition to the roof line, which nearly 99% of the time is not the case with satellite imagery/remote sensing imagery. Additionally, you stated "use the street sign" in regards to one street...Gerard or Girard. I used the OSM existing street name on the OSM map to enter the name of the street. If there's an inconsistency with the street sign and the street name on OSM then by all means correct it, but insisting that the mapper find the street sign to confirm the already entered OSM street name isn't realistic for every case. 100% perfection is an admirable goal and when possible should be the target. It isn't, however, a realistic goal. Hence the request for validating. Is one to assume that you reside in VB, Maine? If so, I'm glad you're validating any entries. Going forward however, you may want to consider your audience and view them as adults who require context with any corrective language. Just stating "you're doing it wrong" is not entirely helpful. I'll, of course, listen to those comments but under advisement and I'll seek out other inputs before making adjustments. Hopefully, these comments provide you some insight into how others who are new to OSM seek to navigate within this community and correctly map in OSM and are not seeking to damage OSM's database with inaccurate information.
ybungalobill (2022-11-09 18:41:21+00:00): Hi elmorobike,

My apologies if I didn't communicate my points clearly. It's just that among a few welcome changes (mapping new buildings) you also made some that appeared like vandalism at a first glance. I'm sorry that I jumped to a wrong conclusion. Let's address some of the points one by one then.

That is a fact that this changeset of yours deletes the Lafayette and a portion of Coolidge Street. I understand that it could have been a mistake. In such a case I recommend that when you're about to upload your changes, you look through the list of the changes (it's at the bottom of the panel when you hit "Save"), and if you see anything unintentional there, you still have a chance to undo those. You can also refresh the page to discard your entire changeset and start from scratch.

"I did rename, per your request, the Dollar General..." note that I already renamed it to Dollar General, as well as addressed some other issues that I raised.

"Gerard or Girard. I used the OSM existing street name on the OSM map to enter the name of the street" The main problem with that changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128406564) is that you added a 2nd overlapping way on top of the existing Gerard Drive. Gerard Drive was already mapped, so it's not clear what you were trying to achieve?

"you stated "use the street sign"" -- I didn't ask you to use the street sign; and I do not live in Van Buren. Street level imagery of that area is publicly available for validation, however.

Re building footprints: the fact that you outlined roof lines suggested that it was an automated edit by a bot. Most aerial imagery is actually oblique, so we can easily see that a building has a rectangular footprint. I admit that this is nitpicking at this point.

HTH & Happy editing
elmorobike (2022-11-09 19:52:04+00:00): All of that commentary was extremely helpful. Thank you for taking the time to explain your perspective.
seattlefyi (2022-11-09 01:55:12+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits! Just a tip, one of the OSM mapping norms (there are many!) is to expand abbreviations in street names (Ln -> Lane, SE -> Southeast) since they can be hard to expand automatically. Also, should "Chesnut" be "Chestnut"? :-) Keep it up!
Chad Moran (2022-11-09 02:11:40+00:00): @seattlefyi you are 100% correct, will fix.

Regarding expansion... I know of tooling used that expects the "SE" "LN" if abbreviated this way from USPS/other jurisdictions.  What is the convention here for that?
seattlefyi (2022-11-09 16:19:47+00:00): I think it's considered up to the consuming software to process it. There is a list of conversions apparently used by the OSM Nominatum tool that looks actively maintained (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name_finder:Abbreviations) and paid services like smarty.com which validate these. Can follow up in a direct message.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-12-21 09:26:59+00:00): Hi, you added access=no to this bridge, are you saying that the bridge is completely shut to everyone?
❤️‍🔥 (2022-12-22 06:15:03+00:00): thanks for updating it :)
charles chilufya (2022-11-09 01:14:05+00:00): Hi Simarsingh, your mapping looks great, keep learning using ID and always when you are not sure of anything leave it to building=yes or visit the OSM wiki for more tagging's names. Great work, keep mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128662773
charles chilufya (2022-11-09 01:30:29+00:00): HI @tx2ny Great works here. however as i was just wondering after  looking at your works on project #hotosm-project-13440 #zambia-census #jpmc 128662775, i have noticed that trees, small hill has been mapped as  buildings,  some building were not squared well in rectangles using Q  the keyboard.  circled building mapped as squares ones. Try to revisit and check the work again too. Try all image but Maxer will do the job. a friendly message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128662775
seattlefyi (2022-11-09 01:44:51+00:00): Hi, for this church building, building=yes (which you added) is fine, but since the church is no longer open, you can add the "disused:" prefix to the key (as in "disused:amenity=place_of_worship") so we know it's no longer open. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
ovruni (2022-11-09 01:41:46+00:00): Hola Mayela Ore, he notado que varias áreas pequeñas se han agregado como si fuesen parques, desde la imagen aérea solamente se aprecian áreas de grass en esta zona. Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
seattlefyi (2022-11-09 02:03:33+00:00): Hi, looked at the houses you drew, and they look really good! Looks like you used the squaring tool, which is really helpful. Keep it up!
PolyDunami (2022-11-09 01:40:15+00:00): A construction zone was also added in this changeset.
Carnildo (2023-04-06 21:22:24+00:00): Is there a reason why you deleted the section of service road connecting Alpine to Linder Ridge?
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2022-11-09 07:43:27+00:00): Hello,
the tag "name" should be used if you know the real name of a street

Please, read this page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name , especially this part:

"Do not use name=* if:

  ....
    The feature is known by a generic term or description. Use a feature tag to indicate the type in a language-neutral, machine-readable way. You can also use description=* or note=* if other tags do not quite express what differentiates the feature from others of the same type."

Alessandro
rab (2022-11-09 16:31:26+00:00): the name tag is from the originally changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127581569

recently there have been many comments about poor mapping in this region:

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Somalia&d=30#11/3.1337/45.9174
YosemiteValley (2022-11-09 23:16:41+00:00): Hello Alessandro, rab is correct, I did not add the name tags to these highways. My edits pertained to the geometry of these highways. It looks like the edit that added the name came from this project: https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/13457
I hope that helps, happy mapping!
AngocA (2023-01-09 17:37:00+00:00): Hola, vemos que has hecho grandes cambios en el área. Sin embargo, algunos no creemos que sean válidos.
Por ese motivo, hemos creado un PoW: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128664993

Espero nos expliques tus cambios.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-11-09 17:42:35+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  

I took a moment to review your changeset here, and while your edit to the map looks good overall, it would be helpful if you could explain briefly in a changeset comment what you did here. A simple comment like "Added a building" would be sufficient.

You can read more about it on this Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I also recommend that you make your buildings rectangular by selecting them and pressing Q. You can find more shortcuts to improve your mapping at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts

Happy mapping and best regards,

Casper
ElliottPlack (2023-09-28 18:48:39+00:00): adjustments look good, thanks for the updates. Was just out there yesterday and noticed a few more.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
olo81 (2022-12-06 21:06:21+00:00): To nie jest śluza rowerowa!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10170655930

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Aluza_rowerowa
silversurfer83 (2022-11-09 18:38:03+00:00): Dear  Юрeц ,

Thanks for your contribution.
I'd like to ask you for two things:
One: Please comment in English, when not mapping in a Russian (?) speaking country
Two: Please keep your changesets geographically smaller. See here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Happy mapping
silversurfer83
osmviborg (2022-11-09 06:40:50+00:00): Cykelstierne var i store træk i forvejen tagget på Rødovre Parkvej, nu er der så dobbelt cykelsti. Følg gerne denne vejledning: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
vasony (2023-02-08 12:05:18+00:00): Kedves Szerkesztő!

Köszönjük a hozzájárulást a tűzcsapok ügyében, ha esetleg az átmérők is bekerülnének a tűzcsap táblákról, az szuper lenne.

Viszont a Reference (ref) mező a tűzcsap egyedi azonosítójára való, az ilyen "Sarkon, út melletti előkertben" típusú leírásoknak a Description mezőbe kell kerülnie.
De véleményem szerint nem feltétlenül szükséges ezeket megadni, a térképen való koordináta és a position mező már elárulja hol van.

Köszönettel, Tamás
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Piskvor (2022-11-14 10:28:20+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128882957 : original tagging was scarce but correct, this is a department located in a different building from the central office.
map per (2022-11-09 07:25:13+00:00): Sendling und Obersendling sind schon eher gleichrangig. Auf der Webseite der Stadt München [1] wird Obersendling auch als Stadtteil bezeichnet, was in München place=suburb entspricht. Hab Obersendling deshalb wieder zu place=suburb gemacht.
AndersAndersson (2022-11-09 19:43:05+00:00): Don't you think it would be better to tag the building with building=roof and eventually a layer=1?

Also the bulding and road shall not share nodes. You can not drive from the road up on the roof.
Misa_zumba (2022-11-10 08:11:53+00:00): Hi AndersAndersson,
Thank you for contacting me and for noticing that. You have a right, tag building=roof should be used when we map covered parts of the road.
On the contrary, they have to share nodes so we can explain the meaning of that intersection, for example, when you map garage enter, covered, building_pasage...
If you use layers to avoid map errors that is not good because that way you don't show the actual state of the map.
Actually, you can drive from the street on the top of the building roof.
59.9693094, 11.0068766 ;)
Misa_zumba
AndersAndersson (2022-11-10 21:02:37+00:00): This roof and the road are not connected. They should not share nodes.
The roof should have layer=1 since it is above the road.
A parking garage should of course share nodes with the road, but that is a different thing.
Misa_zumba (2022-11-12 20:56:35+00:00): No need for that.
As you can see on this link
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=61.0149642&lon=14.5384154&zoom=19&camera.theta=55.027&camera.phi=28.648
just turn off all "Display" and wait for that part of the map to be displayed.  
It renders perfectly fine when you add "building=roof" because implies that is above the ground. With tag "covered=yes" you explain that that specific part of the road is covered that's why they share the same node and don't make any problem on the map. It would be problem if you have "covered=yes" tag on a way and nothing above.
AndersAndersson (2022-11-12 23:53:02+00:00): To have something that is not connected IRL connected in OSM by nodes seems very awquard. What purpose would that serve? It gives a false impression that you could go from the forst to the second object. Which you can't.

The much simpler solution would have been to just add layer=1 to the roof here, and just leave (one single way) the way it was. What drawbacks do you mean that would have?
Frans S (2022-11-09 09:30:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.
Please do not upload just a single or few buildings at the time. Try to complete the whole task and upload them.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128671120
AndersAndersson (2022-11-09 19:40:47+00:00): Don't you think it would be better to tag the building with building=roof and eventually a layer=1?
AndersAndersson (2022-11-09 19:42:38+00:00): Also the bulding and road shall not share nodes. You can not drive from the road up on the roof.
Misa_zumba (2022-11-10 08:10:45+00:00): Hi AndersAndersson,
Thank you for contacting me and for noticing that. You have a right, tag building=roof should be used when we map covered parts of the road.
On the contrary, they have to share nodes so we can explain the meaning of that intersection, for example, when you map garage enter, covered, building_pasage...
If you use layers to avoid map errors that is not good because that way you don't show the actual state of the map.
Actually, you can drive from the street on the top of the building roof.
59.9693094, 11.0068766 ;)
Misa_zumba
euroPathfinder (2022-11-11 16:47:56+00:00): Hallo MobiWert,
vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag.

Die von Dir eingegebenen Werte für Öffnungszeiten passen leider nicht in das OSM Format. Du darfst nicht "Uhr" in das entsprechende Feld reinschreiben sondern nur die Zahlenwerte, siehe auch hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Außerdem ist es ungünstig wenn Du einen Punkt löschst und neu erstellst, bitte ergänze/überarbeite in Zukunft den bestehenden Punkt. Denn so sind durch Deine Bearbeitung Website sowie Telefonnummer verloren gegangen. Ich habe Deine Fehler behoben. Kein Problem, am Anfang macht jeder Fehler, einfach als Hinweis für zukünftige Beiträge :)

Beste Grüße und schönes Wochenende!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128671244
Ekeefoof (2022-11-13 15:21:54+00:00): Dieses Changeset enthält signigikante Fehler: z.B: Unterbrechung der Winnender Straße, nicht exisitierende bzw. redundante Fahrradwege
FraukeLeo (2023-05-31 10:46:54+00:00): Hallo Stubenkater, was genau soll aus https://osm.org/way/110325849 und Fortsetzung werden? path=track ist kein etabliertes Tagging.
Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (2023-06-14 15:51:31+00:00): Was schlagen Sie vor? Gerne können Sie das ändern, solange meine Relation weiterhin so besteht, wie ich sie angelegt habe.
FraukeLeo (2023-06-14 16:40:43+00:00): Wenn da ein Feld-Fahrweg ist, highway=track, wenn da ein Pfad ist, nicht für Traktoren gedacht, dann highway=path.