piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-11-06 22:35:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
muralito (2019-11-06 23:09:09+00:00): Hola. 

No pegues los perimetros de plazas, predios, edificios, etc. a las vias que representan los ejes de las calles.

Por ejemplo esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698489589 va como estaba antes que la cambiaras.

Solo muy pocos casos como alguna calle que termina exactamente en el borde de un predio como en un muro se dibujan pegadas en ese punto.
A67-A67 (2019-11-06 22:43:20+00:00): Hallo Dirk,

Nog een tip om het correct te krijgen. De buitenste weg (met de rol 'outer' in de multipolygon) heeft nog de tag building=yes. Als je die verwijderd, klopt het.
Glassman (2019-11-06 23:27:09+00:00): I removed the name from the driveway - we don't use descriptive names. Instead I added the housenumber to the house. I'm not sure of the city or zip so I'll leave that for you to add.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76724844
Glassman (2019-11-06 23:28:32+00:00): I should add that a 15mph speed limit on a driveway seems really fast :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76724844
Frans S (2019-11-09 09:30:13+00:00): Hello Jason, 
Because I invalidated a task from you I review more of your work.
We pay extra attention on new mappers work to see if they comply with the instructions and are of a good quality

Please map missing buildings visible on the MAXAR imagery. Please use the Maxar Std Imagery as the primary source. More recent and actual than the BING imagery and prescribed in the instructions
Your mappings are fair, don't forget to square the buildings with the Q key.
Why not map all buildings which are visible in the left down corner? Now other mappers have to go over this task again which still need to be mapped.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2019-11-07 15:26:07+00:00): Hello jnavarro_. Thanks for mapping on this project. You did a rather good job. We pay extra attention on new mappers work and advise if and how they can improve their mappings.
A few remarks. 
First. this is a building only project. Don't bother about  other objects like highways,
Please be as accurate as possible by following the outlines of buildings and do not include several buildings in 1 mapping.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gjraDKIuYKQ9c7asnOlA4ioeZDty195U
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
Frans S (2019-11-07 15:53:43+00:00): Hello Jason DiNapoli. Thanks for mapping here as well. A question. Despite the instructions you mapped with the Bing imagery (rather old. Maxar is much more recent and shows more buildings)
Did you select Bing imagery or came it as default. I am asking this because when I open this task in iDeditor the Maxar imagery has been  selected automatic. Thus the prescribed imagery.
Please let me know. 
Best regards
mikkolukas (2022-07-03 01:45:07+00:00): Don't put foot=no on crossings where it is actually allowed to cross.

On this highway it is for example perfectly fine to cross the larger road on foot:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10058305
GeoidDude (2022-07-05 23:53:24+00:00): Hello mikkolukas, Bulls_eye is currently not on our team so I will be responding on her behalf. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. This edit occurred before a conversation you had with a fellow team member about this topic in April 2020 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76508518). As a team, we are now aware of this issue and will refrain from making these edits in the future. Thank you for your feedback and have a great day!
mikkolukas (2022-07-06 03:50:44+00:00): Thanks for you kind and polite response! :)

Now my comment seems so harsh in comparison. It was in no way meant to be :)
Frans S (2019-11-09 09:31:52+00:00): Hello Jason.  Fine and accurate mapped.
Thanks
OrionX (2019-11-06 23:11:40+00:00): а также 76314434 и 76313080
OrionX (2019-11-06 23:13:26+00:00): и 76306919
mapatite (2019-11-07 22:50:14+00:00): Hello OrionX,

I have reached out to you about over complicating junctions in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65724130 but got no response. I noticed you reverted my edits with this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76725289#map=18/56.86604/35.91326. I will likely change it back to OSM policy unless you have a reason you are modeling it this way. Here are some best practices: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_for_the_renderer. You can also tag lane specific information on one way instead of digitizing multiple ways per the Lanes OSM policy: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes.

Thanks

Привет OrionX,

Я связалась с вами по поводу сложных перекрестов в этом наборе изменений: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65724130, но не получила ответа. Я заметила, что вы вернули мои поправки в этом наборе изменений: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76725289#map=18/56.86604/35.91326. Если у вас нет причин моделировать это таким образом то я скорее всего я поменяю это назад в соответствии с правилами OSM. Вот несколько рекомендаций: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_for_the_renderer. В соответствии с правилами OSM, вы также можете пометить информацию о конкретной полосе, а не оцифровывать несколько полос: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes.

Спасибо
OrionX (2019-11-08 06:56:40+00:00): Hello. The road junction is drawn correctly, as it exists in reality. Changing lanes is not a priority now. Any changes to this intersection are not required now. If there are any errors, I will correct them myself in the future. Please do not cancel the changes made by local OSM participants on the maps of Russia. Local participants OSM better know how the road infrastructure and road junctions in their hometown. Thanks.
pacman541 (2019-11-08 11:25:55+00:00): А разве линия 657415471 (поворот направо с Нового моста в Затверечье) должна пересекаться с линией 657415482 (прямой проезд по Комсомольскому проспекту от Нового моста) ?
OrionX (2019-11-08 12:07:19+00:00): Согласен. Исправил.
mapatite (2019-11-14 16:51:16+00:00): Hey OrionX,

When I edited that junction it was not my intention to cancel your changes, but rather to edit in a way that was consistent with global policy and best practices. I am more accustomed to seeing intersections modeled like this in Russia https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/18485000#map=18/58.52324/31.24993. Here, the turn lanes are not modeled using highway_links. This results in a less cluttered intersection, which still allows proper routing. The way this junction is modeled now introduces the need for multiple turn restrictions. For instance you are now able to turn left from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657415463 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35090230 and vice versa. I just wanted to give you context as to why I made those edits.
Frans S (2019-11-09 09:33:24+00:00): Hi Jason. Because you used the wrong imagery you missed several buildings which has been erected since the Bing imageries were taken. Further no comment. Good mappings
Frans S (2019-11-09 09:34:57+00:00): Fine mapping. removed farmland mapping
Best regards
SomeoneElse (2019-11-06 23:17:02+00:00): I was actually trying to see how much gets flooded _east_ of the Derwent but couldn't get that far because all access from the _west_ was flooded!
fred_eisele (2019-11-06 23:54:11+00:00): Help
I made some changes in this changeset that are incorrect.
In particular I converted a building to a parking lot. 724187554 
I also extended the parking lanes.
724436474 and 704645175
sskalyan (2019-12-28 13:08:38+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/727511169 this is not a drive thru,  please change it as parking aisle.

Thanks,
Kalyan.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76726172
Rashid86 (2019-11-10 10:41:18+00:00): Согласно постановление Атырауского городского акимата Атырауской области от 10 мая 2011 года N 705: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V11TA000142 проезд Керченский переименован на проезд Бурабай (вообще "Боровое" нету такого названия улиц в Атырау)
BigPastaDinner (2019-11-14 17:59:50+00:00): Hello RashidYandex,

Thank you for the information. I have corrected the name of this street. There are many street names that have not been updated including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118627833 which should be named проезд Бурабай instead of проезд Керченский according to http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V11TA000142. Do you plan to update the street names in Atyrau?
korolenok (2019-11-11 15:02:16+00:00): All bad names were reverted. Please do not make spam edits. If you don't stop doing this, I will be forced to inform the Data Working Group and your account will be blocked.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76726508
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2019-11-07 08:34:10+00:00): Du kan bruke "s"-tasten for å gjøre om markerte firkanta ting (som bygninger) til å ha perfekte vinkler. De du har tegnet hittil ser veldig "frihånd" ut ;)
MarlinMr (2019-11-07 08:35:54+00:00): Takk, skal bruke den litt mer
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2019-11-07 12:21:34+00:00): Den var visst endret siden jeg brukte iD sist. Det er 'Q' som retter ut hjørner nå :)
sskalyan (2019-12-28 13:01:52+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150809232 is this really a oneway? lane markings and yellow lines on the road are contradicting. 

Thanks,
Kalyan.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76726930
Frans S (2019-11-07 11:59:45+00:00): Hello Claire. Thanks for mapping here.
A few remarks. You tend to map clusters or blocks of buildings as 1 (big) building. Please map each building individually,
Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gjraDKIuYKQ9c7asnOlA4ioeZDty195U
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
Glassman (2019-11-07 06:45:29+00:00): The US doesn't have what OSM defines as living streets. They should be classified as residential. Can you make the change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76727061
davidm870 (2019-11-07 12:39:26+00:00): These are not public roads. They are on private property.I changed them to driveways. Does that work better?
Glassman (2019-11-07 18:55:20+00:00): That works much better, especially after looking at Bing Streetside. They look like driveways, even though the county has them in their database as unnamed. My guess is the county adds all street for 911 service.
Discostu36 (2019-11-07 12:05:50+00:00): Please try to upload your changes in more regional batches instead of including changes in RU and US in the same changeset.
literan (2019-11-07 12:38:45+00:00): Discostu36, maps.me uploads the changes automatically. You should better to write to developers of this soft
Chris_e (2019-11-07 00:58:07+00:00): Well done, Caroline. Keep up the good work!
stevea (2019-11-09 22:19:17+00:00): Fantastic work, Micah, thank you!
woodpeck (2019-11-07 19:25:30+00:00): Hello, please stop adding translations to features. The "name:xx" tag is to be used if the feature actually has an own name in that language. It is not for translations or transliterations!
Leo Slager (2019-11-09 01:26:40+00:00): Er is helemaal geen eenrichtingsverkeer
voor alle verkeersdeelnemers.
fietsers, bromfietsers en motoren kennen op deze wegen geen beperkingen.
oneway kan dus niet gebruikt worden.
Er is slechts een inrijverbod van 1 zijde voor motorvertuigen op meer dan 2 wielen.
Dat geef je dus aan met
motorcar:backward:conditional=
no @ (Mo-Fr 06:00-09:00)
En dat dan ook nog op een klein stukje van de weg waar het verbod begint.
Komende van de andere zijde zijn er geen verboden, dus kan ik overal op deze weg keren en terugrijden. Er is dus gewoon tweerichtingsverkeer.
Ook als bewoner kan ik in beide richtingen van huis vertrekken.
Leo Slager (2019-11-09 01:28:16+00:00): Alle oneway onzin is verwijderd.
Frans S (2020-01-03 15:18:11+00:00): Hello SushiNinja.
Please read the instructions before starting to map.
This is a building/highway only project.
Mapping  farmland is not one of them
Please keep that in mind
Best regards
Leo Slager (2019-11-08 00:31:28+00:00): Beide voorwaarden zijn gelijk:
yes 1600-1900.
Mi kan dat niet juist zijn.
1 van beide zou no moeten zijn.
Leo Slager (2019-11-09 10:33:50+00:00): onzinnige oneway tags zijn verwijderd.
Er is daar geen eenrichtingsverkeer.
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-09 17:28:57+00:00): Dan moet je maar beter Engels leren Leo.
"The main use is to allow traffic to go in different directions during rush hours in the morning and evening"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway=reversible
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-09 18:43:01+00:00): Graag wil ik ook reacties in het Nederlands of Engels zien.
We spreken geen Afrikaans in Nederland.
Leo Slager (2019-11-09 23:05:15+00:00): Dat is geen kwestie van kennis van het Engels, maar kennis van de NL wegenverkeerswetgeving.
Er is geen sprake van eenrichtingsverkeer, maar van een tijdelijk inrijverbod voor motorvoertuigen op meer dan 2 wielen.
En dus ook niet voor alle verkeer, zoals jij de zaak getagd hebt.
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-10 16:54:05+00:00): Als je er alleen uit mag rijden is er zeker wel sprake van eenrichtingsverkeer.
Leo Slager (2019-11-10 17:19:49+00:00): Het gaat hier niet om onze beleving maar om wat er feitelijk door de wegbeheerder aan maatregelen is afgekondigd.
Zo zou er bij het instellen van eenrichtingsverkeer onder meer ook gelden dat je niet mag keren op de weg en je hoeft als verkeersdeelnemer geen rekening te houden met tegemoetkomend verkeer.
Als ik van de andere zijde kom zijn er geen borden geplaatst, dus is het normaal tweerichtingsverkeer, mag ik keren en verder rijden. Ook vanuit een zijweg staan er geen borden, dus mag ik links en rechts afslaan.
Het is dus verkeerstechnisch geen éénrichtings-verkeersweg. Dat blijkt ook uit het ontbreken van de daar bij horende borden.
Er is alleen tijdelijk een gesloten verklaring voor motorvoertuigen op meer dan twee wielen. Voor alle andere weggebruikers zijn er helemaal geen beperkingen.
En de gesloten verklaring eindigt bij de eerstvolgende zijweg als daar het bord niet herhaald wordt.
Dat is het wettelijk kader dat wij zouden moeten taggen.
Dat kan dus niet met oneway= * want dat geldt voor alle verkeersdeelnemers.
Dat kan dus alleen met motorcar:forward:conditional= no @ (....)
Alle andere tags zijn onjuist of je gebruikt een foutieve syntax.
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-10 23:57:30+00:00): Zie: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=768500#p768500

Daarom heb ik de eenrichtingsverkeer dus ook niet voor de hele weg ingesteld.
Overigens moet je behoorlijk je best doen om te keren op het bruggetje.
Daarom moet je dus van te voren keren.
Warin61 (2020-03-07 07:20:22+00:00): Please revise your edits where construction=* has been left behind and the tag highway=construct has been altered.
viloan (2019-11-07 02:01:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
chnav (2019-11-07 05:23:50+00:00): Удаление валидных данных и перерисовка заново.
Использование карт Яндекс, гугл, 2ГИС и других запрещено. Соблюдайте правила проекта.
За неоднократное нарушение правил проекта учетная запись может быть заблокирована, а обход блокировки путем созданий новых учетных записей ЗАПРЕЩЁН.

Правка откачена полностью.
chnav (2019-11-07 05:23:57+00:00): Удаление валидных данных и перерисовка заново.
Использование карт Яндекс, гугл, 2ГИС и других запрещено. Соблюдайте правила проекта.
За неоднократное нарушение правил проекта учетная запись может быть заблокирована, а обход блокировки путем созданий новых учетных записей ЗАПРЕЩЁН.

Правка откачена полностью.
Jordi MF (2019-11-07 08:34:23+00:00): Hola,

Gracias por mejorar los datos de OpenStreetMap. Por favor, intenta seguir las indicaciones de la wiki y de la comunidad española a la hora de realizar cambios en los nombres de los topónimos. En varios casos has eliminado los nombres oficiales para cambiarlos únicamente en español. Si deseas añadir alguna traducción, existe la etiqueta name:es=*.

Por otra parte, tampoco es correcto eliminar playas enteras. La toponimia oficial indica que sí existe la Platja Nord de Gandia.

Por tanto, se realizará una reversión de los datos y se añadirán las traducciones pertinentes al castellano.

Saludos,
Jordi
user_5359 (2019-11-07 17:50:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
nevw (2019-11-07 05:27:25+00:00): Hi
I reverted this as you have placed the business on the roadway centreline instead of over the actual building you operarate from.
user_5359 (2019-11-07 16:42:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2019-11-07 17:54:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Are name=1 and 2 the house numbers (addr:housenumber)?
Leo Slager (2019-11-08 00:52:32+00:00): De bollard staat niet op de juiste plaats.
de woningen 20 en 22 zijn gewoon bereikbaar, dus de restrictions zijn niet juist.
De bollard is voorzien van de juiste tags, dus de restrictions zijn volkomen overbodig.
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-09 18:44:05+00:00): Nee, want de bollard kan omlaag staan en de borden geven alsnog een restrictie aan.
Leo Slager (2019-11-09 23:09:40+00:00): Of de bollard omlaag staat, maakt niet uit.
De retricties die zijn getagd, blijven dan gewoon geldig. En dus zal een navigatie-app daar geen route overheen tonen.
De situatie was door voorgaande mappers dus correct weergegeven.
En dat behoeft niet gewijzigd te worden.
Glassman (2019-11-07 21:18:38+00:00): The building you added is much bigger that what is in the imagery. Can you adjust to match the imagery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76733134
named_after_GZ (2019-11-11 07:39:23+00:00): Dear Umar, by changing roads' type, you are SPOILING the whole routing graph of a country so that many users would stop receiving map updates. Please switch the roads' type back, from 'motorway'  to 'residential street'
Glassman (2019-11-07 19:19:24+00:00): A turning loop is usually tagged for cul-de-sacs. This looks like a round-about. I removed the turing loop tag. Do you want to add the roundabout? Hint - the edit can draw a circle for you.
user_5359 (2019-11-07 17:32:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because you deleted a street and add your SPAM on the changeset description (instead to the database).
dval (2019-11-07 09:38:54+00:00): Hi, Stalker61! Не понятно, почему на дороге Ком.-Ун. стоит access=no.
Stalker61 (2019-11-12 19:49:17+00:00): Приветствую.
Ошкуй игрался. Завтра снесу. Движение открыто официально. Сам поинтересовался в дорожном департаменте.
abakus_uploader (2019-11-07 23:34:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2019-11-07 23:34:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!