piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PierZen (2018-01-21 19:30:56+00:00): See modifications in changeset 55631686.  The forestry industry covers vast areas  north of Quebec. Cuts on relatively small areas and the trees left are to contribute to the natural regeneration. Forest regeneration is at various stages and we cannot map such non permanent information. Plus images are often up to 10 years with no economic interest to revise imagery.
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 10:53:01+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55425615
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:26:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Minh Nguyen (2018-01-14 10:17:01+00:00): This changeset comment should be: Added lane counts, turn lanes, lane change restrictions, parking aisles, sidewalks, crosswalks, traffic lights, buildings; micromapped Sharonville Community Center & nearby parks; corrected forest to woods; disconnected woods from roads
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:16:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
BCNorwich (2018-01-14 18:15:52+00:00): Hi, the area can be leisure=park and at the same time the landuse tag can be landuse=village_green. In fact the name says it all!
Regards Bernard
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:55:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
dgitto (2018-01-14 15:16:16+00:00): Can you please use more specific changeset comments? "edits" means nothing. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments.3F
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 10:52:32+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55426167
user_5359 (2018-01-16 21:07:53+00:00): Hello, short question to your changes of way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363617847 : Why did you add the value of keywebsite also as contact:website? And why did you add contact:website3=http://www.arabbatn.com ? This website doesn't exists.
bxl-forever (2018-08-26 11:18:54+00:00): Hello,
Are you sure this is the official name for this path?  I think that "Cité Jourdan - Jourdan-Wijk" is an informal name given by some residents, but the official name here is "Parc de la Cité Jouët-Rey - Cité Jouët-Rey park"
What do you think?
SunCobalt (2018-10-04 12:25:23+00:00): Du hast bei den im Folgenden aufgelisteten Objekten den regulären im Wiki dokumentierten Tag `wikidata` gelöscht. Ich möchte Dich um Info bitten, warum Du mit einem regulären Account und verschleiernden Changeset-Kommentaren diese Löschungen vornimmst. 
(OSM ID, Typ, User, wikidata-value, changeset)
21412516 , node , Nakaner , Q12809602 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55426424
25601842 , node , Nakaner , Q324780 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59958932
27464973 , node , Nakaner , Q821332 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59506120
33640346 , node , Nakaner , Q538828 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59918580
43502740 , node , Nakaner , Q322795 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59918580
108112922 , node , Nakaner , Q568019 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59958932
117367378 , node , Nakaner , Q15107313 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60441216
222286144 , node , Nakaner , Q323697 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59958932
349315911 , node , Nakaner , Q801411 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59918580
482840686 , node , Nakaner , Q438795 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55433654
676625175 , node , Nakaner , Q800997 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59958932
1453621778 , node , Nakaner , Q325146 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54905533
2700123206 , node , Nakaner , Q801320 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62427547
2821118193 , node , Nakaner , Q324771 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59918580
2922270819 , node , Nakaner , Q17310439 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59918580
3041262555 , node , Nakaner , Q323662 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59918580
3060765256 , node , Nakaner , Q800422 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55386236
3175310450 , node , Nakaner , Q735335 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59958932
3175312889 , node , Nakaner , Q2289576 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55337388
3230528172 , node , Nakaner , Q800993 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59958932
4247176265 , node , Nakaner , Q678650 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56657982
4371485220 , node , Nakaner , Q801152 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59958932
5073053972 , node , Nakaner , Q14906377 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59918580
Nakaner (2018-10-04 18:25:03+00:00): Die Ergänzungen des wikidata=*-Tags sind alle durch nyuriks im Rahmen eines automatisierten Edits erfolgt, der nicht diskutiert wurde.
SunCobalt (2018-10-05 06:29:25+00:00): So geht das aber nicht. Entweder setzt die DWG das zurück, oder meinetwegen auch Du mit deinem Spezialaccount, oder man lässt das. Für solche Aktionen  sind diese dedizierte Accounts schliesslich da. Wenn man an den Tags interessiert ist, kann man sich nach einem Revert daran machen, die Löcher zu stopfen. Wenn Du mal hier mal da über Monate verteilt etwas löscht und die Löschungen auch noch verschleierst, ist das Vandalismus. 
Weitere Löschungen in dieser Art und Weise werde ich nicht akzeptieren.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:21:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
DaveF (2018-01-14 12:40:56+00:00): Hi
Adding layer does work as Garden & Park are rendered with the same colour. This needs to be noted on OSM Carto's github page.

Also, I don't think the ruin should have amenity tag as that implies it's a working church. ruins=church, maybe?
DaveF (2018-01-14 13:16:52+00:00): https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3022#issuecomment-357510876
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:31:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:33:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
CRCulver (2018-02-20 19:03:18+00:00): What is your source for the names of shops in Bădeni? There is no sign outside these shops with a name.

Also, when tagging shops, you do not have to write "Magazin" in the name field. That is already indicated by shop=convenience and only creates clutter.
BCNorwich (2018-01-21 09:22:03+00:00): Hello, I was wondering why you've drawn a park over a residential area, a mistake? Also the footways don't look logical not joining properly, one a duplication of a service road. Then another drawn over the houses. 

Has the area recently been redeveloped?
Regards Bernard
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:56:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
DD1GJ (2018-01-14 12:57:38+00:00): Revert 55426823 55426444 55426391 , Pokémon-Vandalismus

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
highflyer74 (2018-01-14 15:03:40+00:00): Moin!

Nur als Tipp: Bei einer Toilette innerhalb eines Einkaufszentrums muss keine Adresse erfasst werden. Oder möchtest Du da einen Brief hinschicken...? ;-)

Gruss aus HB!
highflyer74 (2018-03-24 12:07:28+00:00): An dieser Toilette hängt auch nach 2 Monaten noch eine Adresse. Ich entferne sie jetzt. Denke bitte daran, dass OSM ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt ist, in dem die Mapper miteinander kommunizieren. Du mappst hier nicht allein...
liamrocker (2018-03-24 12:24:21+00:00): Moin! Hatte dich nicht so verstanden, dass die Adresse wieder entfernt werden soll. Ist doch nur Zusatzinfo, stört doch keinen. Aber ok.
highflyer74 (2018-03-24 13:45:38+00:00): Entschuldige bitte den etwas rauen Ton meinerseits, das war so nicht beabsichtigt. Es ist auch tatsächlich kein "Muss", generell bekommen aber nur Dinge wie Gebäude oder POIs addr.* Daten verpasst. Viele Leute geben z.B. auch Briefkästen addr:*, weil dort eine Adresse draufsteht. Diese gehört aber wiederum in ref=*. Insofern kann ich immer empfehlen, für jeden Kleinkram das Wiki zu studieren. Langfristig machen nur "schön" formatierte Daten OSM besser :-) Gruss aus HB!
user_177389 (2018-01-14 10:51:42+00:00): Hi,
such relations like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7901341 are not a boundary.
user_177389 (2018-01-14 11:57:50+00:00): Now its a boundary, but such relations can not have address tags - especially addr:street and addr:housenumber can not include a bigger area with different addresses.
user_177389 (2018-01-14 11:05:05+00:00): Hi,
such relations like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7901341 can not have address tags - especially addr:street and addr:housenumber can not include a bigger area with different addresses.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:37:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 10:52:11+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55427180
matt_ellery (2018-01-14 22:30:30+00:00): Hi Dan, did you mean to remove ways 540057208 and 540057209? They were mapped recently by michaelinredhill so I would be surprised if the waterways didn't exist any more.
matt_ellery (2018-01-18 12:11:17+00:00): No response so I've undeleted them in changeset 55548041.
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 10:52:04+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55427203
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 10:51:56+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55427218
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 10:51:49+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55427234
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-01-17 16:19:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55526026 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, nonexistent objects].
Omegatherion (2018-01-15 00:19:08+00:00): Die Radwege nur eintragen, wenn diese seperat geführt werden. zB wenn ein Grünstreifen zwischen Fahrbahn und Radweg existiert. Dann den oneway=yes nicht vergessen um Geisterfahrten zu verhindern.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:11:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-01-17 16:19:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55526026 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, nonexistent objects].
highflyer74 (2018-01-17 15:00:59+00:00): Hi there!

Could you please check this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553017382? It is full of non-OSM tagging which should be removed. In case there are more of these objects you added, please make sure to clean them up.

Thank you!
baradam (2018-01-18 00:49:47+00:00): Hopefully I got all the non-osm tags cleaned up. Thanks for bringing these to my attention.
rurseekatze (2018-01-15 12:13:43+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55427380