piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
segubi (2022-11-03 17:27:39+00:00): Es ist einfach eine Nettigkeit an andere Mapper, die Daten überarbeiten. Wenn eine Relation völlig ohne weitere Information herumschwirrt, muß man eben tatsächlich die History erst laden, um zu klären, ob die Relation Sinn macht oder nicht.

note ist für Informationen an andere Mapper, die ihnen die Arbeit erleichtern können, oder sonst von Relevanz sein können. Das macht m.E. immer Sinn, wenn etwas nicht auf den ersten Blick ersichtlich ist.

description beschreibt ein Objekt. Die History beschreibt ein Objekt nicht. Die Löschung der Tags könnte ja auch erfolgt sein, weil sie im engeren Sinn falsch gewesen sind. Die History beschreibt insofern gar nichts.

Die Changesetkommentare sind eigentlich obligat, man sollte NIE Daten hochladen, ohne wenigstens einen kurzen Kommentar im Changeset anzugeben (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz, und die Wikis zu den Tags)

Viele Grüße,
Sebastian
segubi (2022-11-03 17:32:08+00:00): ... sorry jetzt habe ich nicht so genau hingeschaut. Natürlich hattest Du einen Changesetkommentar angegeben. 

Hat mir nur nicht die Löschung der Tags erklärt. Und ich sage ja: Ich stimme Dir vollkommen zu. Aber die Realität ist ja nicht nur, dass es sich um eine beliebige Folge von Radwegen handelt, ohne jede konkrete Bedeutung, sondern um  einen bestimmten Typus von Radwegen. (Ich weiß nicht, wie es bei Dir in der Gegend aussieht, aber in Ostwestfalen gibt es verschiedene Generationen von Radwegenetzen, die nicht komplett abgebaut sind, aber auch keine Kontinuität mehr haben. Die waren bis vor kurzem noch in OSM als scheinbar komplette Routen enthalten, da ist es schon sinnig, wenn klar ist, was eine Relation überhaupt aussagen möchte.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-13 22:31:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2022-09-15 14:50:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention to next points:
This is a Building mapping project. Please focus on that.  btw, you mapped here a part of a road, tagged unclassified. This is at best a track.
Please read the wiki about tagging highways .



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126149217
Jolesh (2022-10-05 10:49:52+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1!
Tausend Dank fürs Mappen der Hausnummern :)
LG Jonas
Geofreund1 (2022-10-05 15:53:39+00:00): Gerne!
Happy mapping
Ha det bra
kuhni74 (2022-09-25 00:37:12+00:00): the address information should have been kept, I have restored it
Minh Nguyen (2022-09-13 19:44:38+00:00): I meant to say: name:was is for the name in the Washo language; use old_name for the former name
Frans S (2022-09-15 14:47:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped, however, not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126149890
Frans S (2022-09-15 14:40:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

 Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
I removed these mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126149906
Frans S (2022-09-15 14:41:30+00:00): Hello. Another point.
Tag area=yes is not a valid tag. See the course of Mapping in ID editor
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126149906
Frans S (2022-09-14 13:13:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
First: Please do not upload a single building at the time.

A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.  The majority is strict rectangular. Draw a building with 4 nodes. (6 with en extention)






Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126149907
Frans S (2022-09-14 13:13:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
First: Please do not upload a single building at the time.

A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.  The majority is strict rectangular. Draw a building with 4 nodes. (6 with en extention)






Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126149907
Frans S (2022-09-14 13:13:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
First: Please do not upload a single building at the time.

A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.  The majority is strict rectangular. Draw a building with 4 nodes. (6 with en extention)






Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126149907
Frans S (2022-09-14 13:13:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
First: Please do not upload a single building at the time.

A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.  The majority is strict rectangular. Draw a building with 4 nodes. (6 with en extention)






Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126149907
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-09-22 00:45:52+00:00): Jamieson Community Correctional Centre   replaced the whole CFB  Halifax relation  fixed the mistake
MxxCon (2022-09-16 03:06:37+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you create this feature?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126150095
JonnyCB13 (2022-09-16 09:07:26+00:00): Hi, I wanted it to be exportable via overpass-turbo.
JonnyCB13 (2022-09-16 09:20:27+00:00): I just noticed, the change of the coastline was accidental. The previous comment was refering to the water area.
MxxCon (2022-09-16 23:48:18+00:00): What kind of query are you using? what exactly do you want to export? From what I see all the water features in this area are already properly mapped. But in addition to this, you tagged this feature as multipolygon even though it's not a relation nor a multipolygon..
I'm thinking this should be reverted
JonnyCB13 (2022-09-17 10:54:14+00:00): Ok nevermind. Sorry for the inconvenience. If you think this should be reverted, feel free to do so, I just don't know how to do it.
JonnyCB13 (2022-09-17 11:01:33+00:00): Before you do so, can you tell me the difference between my area and the water area left of it?
MxxCon (2022-09-17 12:58:50+00:00): What are you trying to accomplish with your overpass query?
JonnyCB13 (2022-09-17 13:33:56+00:00): I want to export roads and water areas as gpx files to create a custom map as a poster. I was able to get the water areas to the west of my new area but to the east there was no area that I was able to create a query for. Thats why I created a new area with the same properties as the already existing area.
orthocircular (2022-09-22 19:57:22+00:00): The shortest answer to your question, as far as I know, is that you should probably query for natural=coastline and then join the coastlines together (maybe with a few extra fake lines added to your renderer afterwards just to make it work) to create oceanic polygons.

Separately, the waterway to the West is a relation of coastlines: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2389633 if we really wanted to make areas for the East River, Bowery Bay, etc, we can do so by adding the coastlines to a new relation with a couple inserted lines here and there to separate them out and close them, but it's probably not necessary.

We have a rule, don't tag for the renderer: if the map objects represent reality then the renderer should generally figure out how to process/display that. (We can't reasonably create a relation of every single coastline to form an ocean, and there is some OSM consensus about where to distinguish the mouth of a river versus the bays and ocean it goes into.)

See here for more: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Coastline
JonnyCB13 (2022-09-23 11:45:36+00:00): Thanks for the detailed answer and sorry for the inconvenience.
ElliottPlack (2022-09-22 15:28:42+00:00): Hello there. The DWG received a complaint about this mass deletion of trails. How can you be sure the data was copied directly from TF, and not the reverse? I see the the source for the trails included a GPX file as the source. Further, I can see there is evidence of trails there on Strava's heatmap, which is an allowable source for OSM. Therefore, they do not exist "only" in Trailforks, but also Strava. I find it unlikely that a trail in both of those sites does not actually exist on the ground, unless it was physically closed. In the case of a trail being physically closed, it is best not to delete and instead mark it as closed.

Additionally, I saw you'd changed a footway that was marked as no bikes/horse, to a path with those access restrictions lifted. The person that originally added that information, did they do that in error?

Please help us understand why these trails were all deleted en masse. In the future, if you think something "cannot be included in OSM", you should reach out to the DWG first, so we could avoid all of this.

Thanks,

Elliott Plack  
OSMF Data Working Group  
data@openstreetmap.org
BPTT (2022-09-22 15:34:49+00:00): Thanks. Now that I know about the Data Working Group, I will be sure to reach out in the future. I was under the impression that using data from Trailforks in OSM violated Trailforks' user license policies - is this not the case? Moreover, the pathways I removed were not simply inaccurate to ground truth, but they also crossed many other ways without intersecting nodes, and many ways simply do not exist at all.

Which footway in particular are you referring to?
Frans S (2022-09-15 14:35:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126150511
Frans S (2022-09-15 14:35:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
This is your very first mapping for HOTOSM !
You mapped multiple buildings as 1 building and connected it to another line.
Best regards



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126150611
Syl (2022-09-13 21:16:02+00:00): Bonjour, si ce sont des lignes électriques que vous essayez d'ajouter c'est https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:power%3Dpole pour les poteaux et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:power%3Dminor_line pour les lignes.
user_2066394 (2022-10-01 15:25:12+00:00): Da würde es Sinn machen, die Bearbeitung auf mehrere Changesets aufzuteilen.
Geographisch und inhaltlich schwer zu erfassen, was passiert.
Hungerburg (2022-10-03 08:58:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094334761 overlaps lots of other areas, this looks a very careless edit
DonRoPL (2023-04-17 09:04:57+00:00): Hey twill91,
fire_hydrant:ref ist not the correct tagging for a hydrant ref. the correct tagging is only "ref".
do you want to look at this again and correct it?
cheers
Warin61 (2022-10-19 23:13:45+00:00): Yet another self crossing way ...Way: 1094337103

Learn not to do this .. or you are going to leave many of them scattered around using maproulette.
risturiz (2022-09-28 15:53:32+00:00): Prueba de concepto -> https://github.com/Openstreetmap-LatAm/pow/issues/2
SomeoneElse (2026-01-04 21:27:16+00:00): I'm guessing that this might be a victim of the pesky "off by 1" error in the spreadsheet - This is allegedly "Micklefield" yet it is very near "Middlesmoor"!
Andy_W (2026-01-05 15:38:49+00:00): I agree this looks like Middlesmoor STW as Micklefield STW is close to the A1M south of Wetherby, but my involvement is "in passing". The original addition seems to have been made by OSM user Welshie (Changeset #117887694). I guess iD invited me to update old tags on the STW whilst saving other changes in the village.
SomeoneElse (2026-01-11 22:13:19+00:00): Thanks - I think that this one got missed because I think that people used the name in the overpass query when searching for data to fix!
SomeoneElse (2026-01-11 22:38:10+00:00): OK - I've confirmed the name "Middlesmoor" matches the coordinates in the current version of the import spreadsheet that Welshie used (the original had the off by one error in it).  I've updated the ref on the "real Micklefield" (which had the right name).  The one below that ("MIDDLETON QUERNHOW/STW	54.2012	-1.49001") hasn't been added to OSM yet.
orthocircular (2022-09-13 21:18:57+00:00): Hi there thank you for your submissions! FYI the parking aisle tag is only for those parts of a large parking lot where you only access them because you're trying to find a parking space. Major routes in/out/through a parking lot are simply plain service roads. I'll make this fix and thanks again!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126152100
orthocircular (2022-09-13 22:22:54+00:00): As you can see in my changeset https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126155487&relations=true I also connected the service road to the building and marked it as a parking garage entrance. Thanks again!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126152100
Natasha_Zhovner (2022-09-23 13:49:41+00:00): Hi! thank you very much for correcting.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126152100
Wilmer Osario (2022-09-14 18:25:53+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por aportar, pero está prohibido colocar información personal o privada en el mapa, como puede leer aquí:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Limitaciones_en_el_mapeo_de_informaci%C3%B3n_privada

Elementos como "Casa norelis palmar" no están permitidos porque atentan contra la privacidad de la persona que habita allí.
aceman444 (2022-09-24 06:22:27+00:00): Ach, popri zastavke Trhovisko cyklopruh ani parkovisko na ceste logicky nie je. Naopak, nove znacenie pokracuje az po Dulovo namestie. Okrem toho je novy cyklopruh aj na opacnej strane (smerom na sever), ale treba zistit presny usek. Taktiez lanes= pocita len pruhy do ktorych sa zmestia auta, takze to bolo treba zmenit na 1. Tie pridane *:lanes su asi OK, tam sa pocitaju vsetky pruhy.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-09 15:26:17+00:00): Hi, 
can you fix this relation 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14577251
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-25 12:49:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126614318 where the changeset comment is: revert deletions of private paths. please mark private paths as private instead of deleting them.
stoffldick (2022-09-14 06:08:03+00:00): @cbuehl Der Weg ist auf diesem kurzen Stück nicht geteert, sondern tatsächlich mit fine_gravel versehen. Man kann das sogar auf den Sat-Aufnahmen (Bayern80, Bing) recht gut erkennen. Ich hab diese Änderung daher wieder rückgängig gemacht. Der Startpunkt war ggf. um 1-2 m verschoben, auch das hab ich jetzt korrigiert.
mueschel (2022-09-17 12:27:55+00:00): This looks like an import of a huge amount of data.  You also added a strange tag to all of these objects: "FITOFISION"

This import does not seem to conform to our import guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
user_5359 (2022-10-24 10:22:12+00:00): I will roll back this record (and others if necessary) unless there is a justification for bulk import.
Richard (2022-10-14 22:55:32+00:00): Hello Sam,

You have significantly broken the map and made it worse for routing by your widespread retagging of minor roads as 'tertiary' without any supporting evidence. Could you say how you're planning to fix this damage?

Thanks!
Richard
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
bxl-forever (2022-09-13 22:31:41+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding more information, but please fix the address: it is not acceptable to write street names only in one language.  Street names must always match the official name (two languages in Brussels).

One more thing: if you add an address to a POI, only the street and housenumbers should be entered.  It is not needed to write the postcode and name of the municipality: in Belgium we have already drawn all the postcode zones and every point within a zone is automatically recognised with the correct postcode.  (Even better: if the POI is located within a building that already has an address, you don’t even need to fill the address, because it will "inherit" the one from the building automatically.)  Good time savers to know!
Badkarmat (2022-09-13 22:41:24+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for your comment. 
Address updated. 
(I reused the old tag of the previous restaurant without checking address details...) 
I've kept the tag tho because the restaurant doesn't have the same address as the rest of the building.
bxl-forever (2022-09-14 13:07:39+00:00): You are right, the mistake in the address comes from an earlier changeset.
bikingaround244 (2022-09-14 20:21:23+00:00): There is a separate cycle path here. It is not unreal it not the best but it is real and clearly marked.
aweech (2022-09-14 20:54:39+00:00): To duplicate what I said in the DM so you stop accusing me of ignore you:
Last I checked (sometime in August) that way I removed (and I have several times against remote mappers) is merely a bidirectional bike lane. We do not tag unprotected bike lanes as separate ways in OpenStreetMap. The bike lane on this part of the Arborway is tagged on the road way appropriately.
SzymonH (2022-09-16 06:32:31+00:00): Ten fragment jezdni powinien kończyć się najdalej w tym miejscu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9793127594 Przystanek będzie fragmentem jezdni Alei Niepodległości.
michalsochacki (2022-09-17 15:57:21+00:00): Racja, sprawdziłem dziś w terenie.
Poprawione, dzięki.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-16 06:20:14+00:00): Thank you! keep up the good work!
emersonveenstra (2022-09-13 23:44:27+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution to OSM! This relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14577542 is not a valid multipolygon, those should just be standalone buildings, there's nothing physical grouping them together
deprecatedbrain (2022-09-14 00:37:23+00:00): Thanks, I fixed that.