piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-09-09 23:52:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2019-09-10 21:46:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2441162168
Duplicated
TravGW (2019-09-10 02:11:15+00:00): Oh no! Your house is under water! Do you need help with the flooding?
Leno$M (2019-09-25 04:48:57+00:00): Hola Cêsar. Te consulto sobre el Pasaje Carlos Gardel que agregaste en este conjunto de cambios ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723280987 )
¿El nombre se refiere al sendero solo en esa cuadra o al sendero entero en general? Yo estoy enterado que el tramo es por el entubado del Arroyo Concordia. Agradezco cualquier información
TravGW (2019-09-10 02:18:25+00:00): Are these apartments really under water?
TravGW (2019-09-10 02:22:25+00:00): More buildings underwater. Are you a Pokemon player? Please do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated.
noisi2000 (2019-09-11 10:38:54+00:00): Let's delete everything not in the Base map.
The wetlands are there believe me or not. What do you think from which source the rivers and streams receive their water after the snowmelt?
Anyway, I'm not in the mood for an editwar. Guard your spot and continue to distribute other mappers. I will not make any changes in this region anymore.
Warin61 (2019-09-11 11:27:21+00:00): Remote mapping these things is not easy. Form my view I see thing that have been labeled wetland .. and then a similar appearing area labels as scree IIRC. Others have comment elsewhere that there is no wetland on one place they know of that has been labeled wetland. 

There needs to be more care in your edits. The base map has at least some ability to be verified and has been based on data going back decades.
K0rtosh (2019-09-10 03:14:25+00:00): Buildings were tagged by mistake, as for the stuff you deleted, I guess I can laugh once satellite has updated. I work in real estate in that area
K0rtosh (2019-09-10 03:21:48+00:00): Curious question though, why would accidentally (or purposefully) flooding a house make me a Pokemon player?
Tindog (2019-09-10 03:27:25+00:00): I honestly have no idea what this conversation is about, but water type Pokemon are the most common type of Pokemon but only spawn near water. So some PoGo players flood there houses to increase their chances.
freebeer (2019-09-10 06:48:24+00:00): the pools added need to be permanent.  i deleted small inflatable pools seen in a different place than you mapped them.  i re-shaped a large above ground pool that was visible in two separate locations that by now could be permanent and excavated.  even if it stretches the osm standards of privacy and permanency, at least it could be seen to be real at least two times in the past six years or so.

the fact you had repeated problems with changing around your plumbing is, i must say, rather suspicious.  most people who make such an error get it fixed in one go.  someone drowning isn't going to reach for a hosepipe.
freebeer (2019-09-10 05:47:03+00:00): the natural=water tag does not belong on a swimming pool, as it is reserved for lakes and ponds, not backyard pools.
jmapb (2021-05-13 22:22:07+00:00): Hi, I'm working in this area and wondering if you remember adding the Hog Hollow Trail relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10021278) in this changeset. It was originally just a single member https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286813490 but that way was split in changeset 89749282 so the relation now also includes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839342870 . Thanks, J
will-i-am (2021-05-13 22:41:51+00:00): Hi J
Sorry but I don't remember the details.
Bill
jmapb (2021-05-14 01:07:58+00:00): Ok, I'm trying to track down the origin of this trail name. I haven't seen it signed or on many maps. It does show up on the DEC Delaware Wild Forest map https://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/lands_forests_pdf/recmapdwf.pdf but that seems to indicate a different trail ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286813485 ).

Anyway, no worries if it doesn't ring a bell, I'll figure out what I can. Thanks for the quick reply, cheers, J
VlIvYur (2020-11-22 13:16:07+00:00): Вы удалили существующий об'ект https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2562935972/history с контактной информацией, вместо этого добавив какой-то обрубок https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6784170797
Постарайтесь не делать так
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-28 20:43:41+00:00): Hallo edathy,
mit der Löschung von r3158329 hast du keine Verbesserung geschaffen, vielmehr hast du die member-ways nicht beachtet und nur den Landuse gelöscht. 
Repariert.
ralley (2019-09-11 08:34:37+00:00): Hi there, when adding nodes instead of putting the information in the name like "Freedom Camping Self-Contained 3 nights" can you please just put the actual name in that tag and put the other info in seperate tags, e.g. "fee=no" and use the description for anything else.  Thanks.
ralley (2019-09-16 18:54:28+00:00): Updated tags
aharvey (2019-09-10 14:40:10+00:00): I believe it's common practice not to name link roads (Denham Street), this is also noted at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary_link, because in this case the link road is not really part of either road.
ortho_is_hot (2019-09-10 23:48:08+00:00): I had presumed that because it was a slip lane it would be considered part of the road, but yeah taginfo has only 11% name=* usage on tertiary_link. Thanks for pointing that out
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-09-10 07:18:57+00:00): Откат правки.
Отрисовка по устаревшим снимкам.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-12 12:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74392300 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some more unlikely mapping in USA.  Attempts to contact the mapper have failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3157
aweech (2019-09-10 17:35:34+00:00): Hi, what is your source for this information?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74288626
aweech (2019-09-11 19:21:25+00:00): Hi, this looks like PoGo vandalism. Can you prove it's not?
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-09-10 07:11:59+00:00): Откат правки.
Неправильная адресация.
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-09-10 07:11:13+00:00): Откат правки.
Неправильная адресация.
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-25 03:02:12+00:00): Hi Abruzzzo, 
could you please explain why you deleted a large landuse relations, leaving the member ways orphaned? 

Refining landuse would have been good, blunt deletion is vandalism.

As other editors have meanwhile removed some of the untagged ways, restoring the relation is complicated.
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-09-10 07:09:52+00:00): Откат правки.
Неправильная адресация.
richter_fn (2019-09-10 05:30:03+00:00): http://www.pravo.gov66.ru/media/pravo/47_Qrhf6dW.pdf
richter_fn (2019-09-10 05:30:19+00:00): южная граница - примерно.
JustinPLain (2019-09-10 23:55:21+00:00): "Used to tag an area of water. The type of water body can be specified with water=*. Note that despite key name it is also used for artificial structures like moats, basins of a wastewater treatment plants, canals etc."

natural=water from the official OSM wiki, there is no reason why fountains and other artificial bodies of water shouldn't have the tag. Yes, it's a bit counter intuitive, but I've looked at references from SLC, NYC, and LA, and many fountains and pools have the tag
freebeer (2019-09-11 00:34:22+00:00): i see you just joined osm yesterday, so you would be unaware of the recent controversy of expanding the use of natural=water and redefining subcategories away from landuse and the like.

my editor displays these pools without subtags as lakes.  in order to be categorised as pools, they need an additional water=whatever subtag, if there is such a thing.

the principle is everything in osm should fit into a single top-level category, which as far as i know is still leisure=pool (used to be amenity= years ago).

i would not use other use of the tag as a reliable guide - there is a lot of pokémon mis-tagging about.
Sawan Shariar (2019-09-12 18:29:08+00:00): Same comment
streckenkundler (2019-09-10 07:53:22+00:00): ALKIS darf in Brandenburg nicht genutzt werden. Es gibt keine Lizenzfreigabe seitens des Landes Brandenburg!

streckenkundler
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-09-10 07:08:59+00:00): Откат правки.
Зданий не существует.
RSergei (2020-01-08 07:16:40+00:00): Добрый день. Вопрос по Поддубровному. Что значит МКЖД №8?
Sawan Shariar (2019-09-12 18:26:45+00:00): Hi Tayef, Thank you so much for your humanitarian work and contribute in OSM. A bit problem with your work. The buildings are overlapped. Need to be more careful to draw. I able to correct it but you need to see this. One more thing to inform you that Maxar Standard Imagery is the updated imagery. Please use it for remote draw. By the way Thank you again.
milet (2019-09-10 11:36:42+00:00): Hallo,

die korrekte Beschreibung für Treppen wäre:
highway=steps
incline=up (bzw. incline=down)

siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dsteps
tdiesel (2019-09-10 13:00:09+00:00): Du hast natürlich Recht, danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte ohne Nachzudenken den Vorschlag von iD übernommen. Den Fehler habe habe ich eben korrigiert.
NotJim99 (2019-09-23 07:26:02+00:00): It's not that they were demolished. They were never built in the first place due to the housing crash in '08.
sskalyan (2019-09-26 13:47:52+00:00): Hi NotJim,

Thanks for the info. I misjudged the scenario from the aerial images.

Regards,
Kalyan.
user_5359 (2019-09-10 15:23:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
freebeer (2019-09-11 07:12:25+00:00): hi faceb00c, please enlighten me, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723322852 what should `im' mean?

'uf düütsch macht koi Sinn, so-there PT-53 (off-topic for this, sorry, i shall seek more punishment)
Jeff Underwood (2019-09-11 14:38:40+00:00): Hey freebeer,
Looks like our import=yes tag got partially deleted on this one. I corrected it.

Do you have your overpass queries shared somewhere? They seem valuable for our own QA processes.

Thanks,
Jeff
freebeer (2019-09-12 14:46:05+00:00): thanks jeff, i'm not sure why i was unable to grok that obvious expansion, other than i was in desperate need of sleep at the time, and well aware of it when posting.  for which i am ashamed.

this was actually pointed out by the OSM inspector instance i carry out worldwide, with too many false positives.  here's a simplified link to where i fell asleep before making it over to western europe:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=123.74205&lat=-3.77236&zoom=5&opacity=0.66&overlays=node_with_short_or_long_key,way_with_short_or_long_key

as i note, it needs a whitelist to exclude the accepted `to' and `pk' or `kp', i forget which, it's all french to me or army duty peeling spuds.
Jeff Underwood (2019-09-13 18:38:11+00:00): Thanks for the info!
Rom1 (2019-09-11 07:05:52+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette première contribution mais elle reste très perfectible : des établissements sont créés en doublon de ceux déjà existants dans la base et pour la plupart, la position n'est pas en lien avec un bâtiment. Bonne continuation tout de même !
Carto'Cité (2024-01-14 11:44:52+00:00): Bonjour Régis,
J'ai enlevé bicycle=designated et foot=designated sur ce way : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723324313
J'ai ajouté une référence à une photo Mapillary sur laquelle on voit le way et il n'y a aucune signalétique qui le justifie à ce que je vois. Selon ce que je sais et vois des pratiques, il faut réserver les *=designated aux éléments qui ont une signalétique explicite. Même ce passage est clairement fait pour les piétons et probablement les cyclistes, il n'y a pas d'élément pour le justifier et le droit d'accès au path est suffisant. J'ai aussi ajouté le tag surface par contre qui lui témoigne du côté cyclable et marchable.
N’hésite pas si tu as des questions ou des remarques :)
Charles
mueschel (2019-09-10 13:18:21+00:00): Hi, you added several objects with a tag "man_made_feature" - this is not a common tag and is not documented. Please have a look to the Wiki to find a tag that is appropriate for these objects.
Thanks
Jan
dekatherm (2019-10-15 14:41:12+00:00): Please be careful with multipolygons: If you cause a hole, the whole area is not rendered anymore.
PT-53 (2019-11-09 15:23:51+00:00): Hallo jojokant,
bei dieser Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/720166577/history
ist noch das Merkmal construction=residential gesetzt.
Hast Du ausreichende Ortskenntnisse und kannst sagen, ob dort noch eine Baustelle ist oder ob die Straße vielleicht schon fertiggestellt und für den Verkehr freigegeben?
Fragende Grüße
jojokant (2019-11-10 20:16:41+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
die Straße wurde zwischenzeitlich fertiggestellt.
Gruß
jojokant
xogalla (2019-10-20 22:01:43+00:00): Ist der Main-Donau-Kanal eher als water=river oder water=canal zu taggen?
rop77 (2019-10-21 06:59:29+00:00): Der Main-Donau-Kanal nutzt hier das Flußbett der Altmühl. Er wurde zwar begradigt, das wurde die Altmühl aber auch über ihren gesamten Verlauf.
Ich denke "river" sollte passen.
Nördlich von Beilngries ist das Bett komplett künstlich, da ist es ein Kanal.

Gruß, Ronny
abakus_uploader (2019-09-10 22:30:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
rkurzawa (2019-09-10 23:59:56+00:00): Temporary Rd between Brookfield St and Beauchamp Drive has now been demolished with preparation for housing to be built on the land.  Please do not reinstate.
mariotomo (2019-11-28 20:21:37+00:00): hola.  why the change?  is it significantly different than other side streets in the area?  when I visited the place, I would say not.
bunty_6 (2019-12-03 05:22:49+00:00): Mariotomo,
hello. I see your point here. I misread the function of these roads when editing in Marrakesh. I will change these back to service.
mariotomo (2019-11-28 20:28:17+00:00): hi. here again, what's the reason behind the change, and why is this 'pedestrian', while the change in Marrakech you chose 'footway'?  some time ago I tried to open a discussion on making things more uniform all over Moroccan medinas.  but it ended there.
bunty_6 (2019-12-03 05:32:37+00:00): I will return these ways back to service. I agree there should be more documented guidelines for minor ways in the Moroccan major cities.
mariotomo (2019-12-03 15:32:32+00:00): if you want to raise the point again, at talk-ma@openstreetmap.org, it might fall on better ears this time.  there's people from Apple map there now.  according to me, the point to make is: enforcement by law vs most common use vs enforcement by physical impossibility: e.g.: a road which is 80cm wide, it has no bollard at its entrance, or has it, implicitly?

otherwise: consider the width key.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width

thank you for your feedback, and happy mapping.  :-)
mariotomo (2019-11-28 20:30:00+00:00): hi.  do you want to post about this, on the moroccan talk mailing list?  your edits look like different proposals.
bunty_6 (2019-12-03 05:27:24+00:00): No, tagging them as alleys as fine, but it would be useful to also add motorcar=no to the alleys that are too narrow for cars.
glglgl (2019-09-11 09:41:43+00:00): I fixed the relations which you modified here. They were missing (at least) a segment each.
gnoye (2019-09-11 12:22:18+00:00): Could you explain a bit what I did wrong? I'd like to learn from my mistakes.
Thanks
Regards.
Gilles
glglgl (2019-09-11 12:27:11+00:00): Essentially, you removed a line (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31295376) which was part of several boundary relations. This affected many administrative levels, including the country level Ruanda/Tanzania.
Hjart (2019-09-10 10:41:47+00:00): Pga tidligere diskussion med tysk mapper (se historik) har jeg valgt at kalde denne her til live igen
sba-dk (2019-09-10 11:58:45+00:00): Helt ærligt, det kan da ikke være rigtigt at vi tillader denne type barnagtige kommentarer. Hvad bliver det næste: ”Danmarks mærkeligste Vej” eller ”Danmarks grimmeste Hus” ? 
I øvrigt er der intet lokalt belæg, fx en info-tavle, så det kan da aldrig være en description-tag Jeg har slettet igen.
/sba-dk
aixbrick (2019-09-10 10:32:13+00:00): Hallo,
Kaiserplatz Aachen: Auf den von dir geänderten Straßen dürfen ausschließlich Busse fahren. Warum also die Änderungen? Vor Ort gewesen?
Gruß
aixbrick (2019-09-17 16:02:16+00:00): Leider hast du nicht geantwortet, daher habe ich die Änderungen mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74589455 rückgängig gemacht.
L'imaginaire (2019-09-10 18:32:32+00:00): Dag Thibault,
Altijd leuk om een nieuwe mapper in de buurt te zien! Fijn dat je extra info aan de apotheek hebt toegevoegd.
Alvast één tip: in een naam-veld zetten we normaal gezien niet waarover het gaat, dus de Pharmacy / Apotheek kan je hier weglaten (en dan moet je het naam-veld ook niet meer vertalen). Dat het een apotheek is, blijkt uit andere velden.

Groetjes en blijf vooral mappen! Ik probeer ook eens naar jouw andere wijzigingen te kijken.
Thibaultmol (2019-09-12 20:04:44+00:00): Goed punt! opgelost https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74407836
L'imaginaire (2019-09-12 20:38:19+00:00): ok!
gpstracks (2019-09-10 17:16:10+00:00): Hi.
Why did you delete an existing track?
IlBano (2020-01-21 22:20:42+00:00): Ciao,

in questo tuo secondo apporto ad OSM hai editato il multipolygon che rappresentava l'Ospedale Sant'Agostino trasformando l'area occupata dagli edifici in un parco e cancellando gli attributi precedenti.
Confido che tu non stia facendo vandalismo su OSM, pertanto ti chiederei di indicare che cosa volevi rappresentare effettivamente.

Grazie

Ciao
SomeoneElse (2020-10-18 12:11:21+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723349298 was offset relative to the imagery.  You can see the correct east-west alignment by looking at the road to the east on OS OpenData StreetView.
Best Regards,
Andy
bdevek (2020-10-19 07:36:54+00:00): Hi Andy,
Thanks for the feedback. Apologies for the miss from my end, I will take care of this detail in verifying all the imageries to ensure road alignment  in my future edits. Happy to learn from community.
Regards
bdevek
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-11 13:26:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75566632 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some doodles and other fake data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75482205 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3204 .
L'imaginaire (2019-09-10 18:39:12+00:00): Ziet er goed uit.
L'imaginaire (2019-09-10 19:30:38+00:00): Ik zie dat het gebouw van Maene aan de oostzijde iets te ver is getekend. Daardoor ligt de weg ernaast ook iets te veel naar het oosten. Je kan in de editor de laag "AIV Vlaanderen GRB" aanzetten om te zien hoe de Vlaamse overheid het gebouw heeft ingetekend. Dat is meestal erg nauwkeurig, terwijl de juiste contouren soms moeilijk te bepalen zijn met luchtfoto's alleen.
L'imaginaire (2019-09-10 19:34:18+00:00): Zou het trouwens kunnen dat de weg rond de zaak wel voor klanten toegankelijk is en niet enkel voor privé-gebruik is?
Thibaultmol (2019-09-12 20:09:05+00:00): Ah, goeie tip, merci!
Het is inderdaad zo dat klanten het mogen gebruiken. Op wat moet ik het dan instellen?
(of moet ik het type weg 'highway' ook veranderen naar iets anders?)

En als die kaart van de overheid het meest klopt, is het dan de bedoeling dat alle gebouwen die inderdaad niet correct staan volgens die map lichtjes verplaatst worden naar de juiste plaats volgens die kaart?
L'imaginaire (2019-09-12 20:56:35+00:00): access=customers
Alle mogelijke waarden worden hier beschreven: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Wat de gebouwen betreft: we zijn de data van de Vlaamse overheid aan het gebruiken om gebouwen in OSM toe te voegen. We doen dit niet zomaar 'blindelings' (de Vlaamse overheid maakt ook wel eens een foutje), maar hebben hiervoor enkele afspraken en een workflow opgesteld, meer info via https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AIV_GRB_building_import

Ik heb een deel van Ruiselede al op die manier gemapt. De rest zal nog wel volgen, is het niet door mij, dan door een andere mapper.
marc__marc (2021-02-20 15:11:36+00:00): Bonjour,
Je cherche de la documentation sur boules=breton afin de compléter le wiki, quel est sa particularité par rapport aux autres variantes ?
Cordialement,
Marc
DiaouligRu (2021-02-21 21:31:16+00:00): Bonjour,
La pratique de la boule bretonne se retrouve, pour schématiser, dans une bande verticale centrée sur le Morbihan et les Côtes d'Armor. La boule bretonne se pratique sur une allée possédant des fonds à chaque bout de l'allée. Suivant les usages locaux, des bandes sont disposées ou non sur les côtés. Les boules utilisées à l'heure actuelle sont en résine (http://laboulebretonne.free.fr/?p=3946). La boule bretonne se pratique sur une allée de fins gravillons qui permettent de jouer à roule. Il est souvent interdit de jouer à la pétanque dans les allées de boule bretonne (risque de détérioration des allées). La présence de clubs de boules bretonnes donnée ici (http://laboulebretonne.free.fr/?page_id=162) donne une représentation assez fidèle des endroits où l'on est susceptibles de trouver des boulodromes publics, ou bien dans des bars ou chez des particuliers. Voici un exemple de règlement pour le jeu de boule bretonne : http://laboulebretonne.free.fr/dev/?page_id=167. Voici une vidéo plus parlante : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgCNXBccNlk&ab_channel=LSEIWebTvSport.
Par ailleurs, on retrouve en Bretagne des jeux de boules plombées un peu plus spécifiques et moins communs.
Salutations,
Jean-Marie
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-20 12:24:44+00:00): Hi Nikola K,
the name you added to the area is clearly wrong, the Schlossplatz is at a different place. 
What source do you use for your edits, as clearly a place name cannot be visible from aerial imagery?
Nikola K (2020-03-20 12:59:45+00:00): Hi, I'm honestly not sure what I was editing 6 months ago but this is obviously a mistake. I might have more edits open at the same time and just inserted the wrong name. Sorry.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-20 13:53:58+00:00): I have fixed the naming issue. 
Leaves open the question what your source of the name was?