piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-08-25 12:15:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings very sloppy and not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123839940
Frans S (2022-09-03 11:47:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123839985
Frans S (2022-08-28 09:54:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
H: Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123839995
Gustavo22Soares (2022-10-15 17:57:14+00:00): é o banco do aquaman??? hahahahah
Frans S (2022-09-14 10:06:02+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
This project is mend to map buildings and residential areas. No land use objects. It makes no sense to map these. It only appears on your task.
Other issues:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
Best regards
Frans S (2022-08-31 13:52:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123840488
jc86035 (2022-07-20 09:31:58+00:00): Penfold Park is already drawn on the map as an area, so it's not necessary to separately add it as a point.
Kovoschiz (2022-07-20 15:33:50+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163970357
ivanbranco (2022-07-22 22:20:35+00:00): Hi divaddivag,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9899334049/history

something went wrong with this place=* value, could you check it out please? :)

good mapping!
divaddivag (2022-07-23 05:42:29+00:00): Oups!!! Corrected now. Thanks. 

 David
JanW_ (2022-09-27 14:14:32+00:00): Diebstahlmeldung vom 14.6.2022, Es wird sich um Ersetz gekümmert, Standort wird evtl. verlegt werden
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-29 14:27:10+00:00): Just to confirm: have you meant gravel by selecting in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128119581 "kies" as the description?
angys (2024-08-08 18:07:23+00:00): May I know the source for you to add this bus stop with name?
opendcc (2022-07-20 10:52:07+00:00): Siehe hierzu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dschool
d.h. das Gebäude sollte schon noch da bleiben ... habs korrgiert
rhtb0 (2022-07-20 10:09:06+00:00): 안녕하세요
그늘막, 화장실, 관중석 같이 지물에 그런 이름들을 넣지 마시기 바랍니다. 그런 이름들을 넣으면 검색할 시 수 많은 결과들이 나와서 찾기가 어렵습니다.
오픈스트리트맵 위키에서도 "사물을 설명하기 위해 이름표를 사용하지 마십시오, 이름 칸에는 해당 지물의 명칭만 적어 넣어야 합니다. . 범주, 유형, 설명, 주소, 참고 사항("20xx년 완공 예정" 등)과 같은 부가 정보를 포함해서는 안 됩니다.  이름이 아닌 정보가 있다면 해당 정보는 오픈스트리트맵에 이름으로 넣으면 안 됩니다. 이름 외의 부가 정보는 해당 정보를 나타내기 위해서 만들어진 다른 태그에 넣으세요."라고 적혀 있습니다. 
일반 지도에는 지물이 무엇인지 구분이 잘 가지는 않지만 설명하기 위해 이름을 적을 필요가 없습니다. 범례 탭을 누르면 지물이 무엇인지 알 수 있습니다.

이러한 편집은 자제해 주세요. 부탁드립니다.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EC%9D%B4%EB%A6%84
rhtb0 (2022-07-20 10:09:29+00:00): '다중 다각형 Baldo Forest': 실제 이름에는 나와 있지 않은, 개체의 유형이나 오픈스트리트맵 용어를 사용하면 안 됩니다.
'서울 교대역', '대구 교대역': 동일한 이름이 여러 개 존재하더라도 이름을 구분하기 위한 수단을 이름 태그에 넣어서는 안 됩니다.
'폐쇄된 펍(해체 예정)': 이름 태그에서 개체를 설명하지 마세요. 이러한 상황에는 description(설명) 태그와 old_name(옛 명칭) 태그를 사용할 수 있습니다.
경부고속도로 부산 방향 차로': 원래는 하나지만 오픈스트리트맵에서 분리되어 나타낸 개체에 별도의 명칭을 붙이지 마세요.
rhtb0 (2022-07-20 10:10:45+00:00): 그늘막만 검색해봐도 수 많은 이름을 가진 지물들이 많이 나옵니다. 
이 지도의 본질은 오픈스트리트맵을 처음 볼 때 나타나는 '표준 레이어'를 편집하는 것이 아닙니다. 지리 정보 전반을 편집하는 것이고 이를 다양한 방식으로 나타낼 수 있습니다.
GOCHIDA (2022-07-20 11:56:34+00:00): 우선 불편하게 해드려 죄송합니다.

님 말씀대로 이름태그에 설명성 내용을 달지 않아야 한다는 것은 알고 있었습니다. 그럼에도 이름란에 넣은 것은 저는 딱 지도를 봤을 때 보이는 것이 중요하다 생각해서 입니다.  
축구장, 게이트볼장, 테니스장 등 각 지물을 선택해서 그려 넣었을때.. 정식명칭이 없는경우 각각의 지물 이름을 굳이 넣을 필요가 없는데도.. 이름을 넣은것은 지물보기를 하지 않는 이상 이것이 축구장인지, 게이트볼장인지, 테니스장인지 지물보기를 하지않는한 지도를 보고는 한눈에 알수가 없어서 그렇게 한것입니다. 
원칙대로 설명태그에 넣으면 그것이 무엇인지는 화면상에서는 나타나지 않으니까요. 지물보기를 해서 그것이 무엇인지 알게 되는 것이 상당히 불편하다 생각했기 때문이죠.

님께선 지물보기를 해야 저 곳이 연주무대인 것을 안다면 불편하지 않으신가요?

그리고 보통..검색할 때 그늘막을 검색하여 그 곳을 찾는 사람이 몇이나 있을까 싶기도 합니다. 

제 변명아닌 변명에 불편하셨다면 죄송하고요.. 우선 님의 지적에 대해서는 너무 감사 드리고 님 말씀처럼 이름태그에 설명성 내용을 금지하는것이 원칙적 룰인 것이니... 앞으로는 정식명칭이 없는 곳엔 이름태그는 사용하지 않도록 하겠습니다.
rhtb0 (2022-07-20 12:52:31+00:00): 이름을 넣은것은 지물보기를 하지 않는 이상 구분하기 어렵긴 합니다. 그렇지만 표준 레이어에만 구분하기 여럽지만 같은 데이터를 사용하는 다른 지도는 쉽게 알아볼 수 있습니다. 지물을 설명하기 위한 이름들은 사실 필요가 없습니다. 지도가 난잡해지기도 하고요, 중복 이름을 가진 지물들이 많이 생깁니다.
rhtb0 (2022-07-20 12:57:54+00:00): 예를 들면 스포츠 시설만 구분해 주는 지도도 존재합니다. 오픈스트리트맵 데이터를 활용해서요. 오픈맵에 접속하면 바로 보이는 지도는 직접적으로 표시되지 않는 지물들이 많습니다. 표준 레이어는 기본적인 정보들만 나오지만 다른 지도에서는 잘 나옵니다.
Carto'Cité (2022-12-19 14:44:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Je remarque que tu as retiré le bicycle=yes de ce chemin :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804333104
En soi c'est une bonne chose car ce tag n'a normalement aucune influence puisque c'est un tag qui concerne le droit d'accès et non la cyclabilité et que pour les highway=path, il s'agit de la valeur par défaut. Mais je me demande si tu ne l'as pas enlevé pour préciser que ce chemin n'est pas très cyclable. Dans cas, il ne faut surtout pas jouer avec le bicycle=yes/no/etc. mais bien avec les surface=*, width=*, segregated=yes/no (que j'ai ajouté), smoothness=*. C'est très courant de confondre le droit d'accès et la cyclabilité et malheureusement cela donne lieu à beaucoup de contributions erronées. N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu as la moindre question.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Taksine (2023-10-02 14:22:51+00:00): 呃，place=neighbourhood不是这么用的吧
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-29 16:48:25+00:00): Hi Dwaalgast,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
Dwaalgast (2022-07-29 17:03:41+00:00): Hi Pascal. 

I map onto the maxar sattelite images supplemented by research on older sattelite images. (I do not map onto these images, but can then better recognise elements on the maxar images).

Best,
Dwaalgast
Warin61 (2022-07-20 23:41:18+00:00): Hi,

Some issues with the muilti polygon relations... 
Example barrier wall
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14370733#map=19/-32.07845/115.75251

With an outer way of 'barrier wall' https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079995163

The way says every thing inside it is a barrier wall.

The relation says not everything inside it is a barrier wall.... as mapped by the inner https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079995164

The inner of the relation is also tagged barrier wall too 
So .... that is  very confusing!!!? 

Are there 3 walls ... 2 walls or 1 wall ???
Amin Fozdar (2022-07-21 00:06:37+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reminding me of this. Yes, I noticed that I did something confusing and incorrect with that wall relation thing, but after that I found a better way to do it, but never got around to fixing that one. I will fix it now, thanks.
highflyer74 (2022-07-25 10:44:04+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Kannst Du bestätigen, dass das gesamte Gebäude von der Zahnarztpraxis genutzt wird und dort kein Wohnraum oder andere Einrichtungen sind?

Anbei noch ein paar Links, die noch schlauer machen ;-)

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße aus HB!

PS: Falls Du Lust hast, schau mal heute Abend auf unserem monatlichen Bremer OSM Treffen vorbei: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Community
Malte006 (2022-07-25 12:34:49+00:00): Moin Highflyer74 und danke!

Von der Straßenseite aus sieht es so aus, ja. Aber es könnte sein das es von der Seite noch einen anderen Eingang gibt. Falls das so ist könnte es auch sein das es noch andere Räume in dem Haus gibt. Wenn ich das nächste Mal in der Gegend bin gucke ich mal. Oder bist du grad eh in der Gegend und hast Zeit mal zu gucken?
Danke für die informativen Links!
Beste Grüße
Đuro Jiří (2022-07-21 14:56:35+00:00): Scusa ma l'hai cancellato Via Carso (solo ultimo pezzo). L'ho riparato (anche il parcheggio) solo a memoria. Andrò a controllare nei prossimi giorni.
ukrtvr (2022-07-21 15:07:19+00:00): Vai, ma vedrai che parcheggio e giro strada intorno alla aiola non c'è più. E tutta una unica piazza pedonale. Oppure puoi guardare questo video https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1055400412041568
Đuro Jiří (2022-07-21 15:11:43+00:00): Sembra che hai ragione, stasera vado lì.
ukrtvr (2022-07-21 15:14:55+00:00): Vai, è molto bello, io sono stato li questo weekend. Dopo sistemi tu?
Đuro Jiří (2022-07-21 15:19:54+00:00): Si, faccio io.
JeroenHoek (2022-07-20 12:07:10+00:00): Sehr gut; aber für Änderungen in den Niederlanden schreiben Sie bitte den Kommentar auf Niederländisch oder Englisch. Damit ist das für andere regionale Mappers auch etwas einfacher zu begriffen.
sjproost (2022-07-20 13:18:24+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich versuche nächstes Mal daran zu denken.
Sarogun351 (2022-07-20 10:20:29+00:00): Translated: There is one complete building, but no 2 separated
YomanNH (2022-07-21 09:21:41+00:00): Cześć,
z jakiego powodu zmieniasz ciągi pieszo-rowerowe na highway=footway?
luk452 (2022-07-21 10:29:20+00:00): Cześć, dziękuję, że zwracasz uwagę. Zasugerowałem się (1) konkretyzowaniem oznaczenia rodzaju ścieżki i (2) tymi ogólnymi informacjami o różnicy między cycleway i footway tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway (cycleway jest tu pokazana jako część ulicy, a nie chodnika).

Po Twoim komentarzu trafiłem jednak na tę stronę (zwykle używam OSM po angielsku): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery i widzę, że błędnie oznaczam CPR jako highway=footway.

Jak rozumiem, w przyszłości i dla tych zmian najlepiej używać jednak ogólnego path?

Czyli najlepiej dla krakowskich CPRów (z pionową linią) używać tagowania takiego: highway=path + segregated=yes + foot=designated + bicycle=designated + surface=paved + cycleway:surface=asphalt + footway:surface=paving_stones?

Co robić z CPRami z pozioma linią?
YomanNH (2022-07-21 12:04:27+00:00): Dzięki za odpowiedź.

Właśnie w takich przypadkach jest problem, że nie jest to ani footway ani cycleway, dlatego najlepiej oznaczać to jako ogólne highway=path i później wskazać szczegóły poprzez foot=designated + bicycle=designated.

CPRy z pionową linią opisuje się właśnie tak, jak opisałeś (oczywiście mogą być przypadki, że surface będzie nieco inne), a te z poziomą linią mają segregated=no + surface=asphalt lub paving_stones (lub coś jeszcze innego), natomiast cycleway:surface i footway:surface nie stosuje się.
luk452 (2022-07-21 12:34:51+00:00): Chyba poprawiłem już to co tutaj zmieniłem. Przy okazji mam pytani, czy sidewalk też unikać i używać path, czy w przypadku sidewalk nie ma problemu i wystarczy oznaczyć rowery jako designated (jeżeli jest CPR)?
YomanNH (2022-07-21 14:24:34+00:00): Jeśli coś jest ciągiem pieszo-rowerowym, to powinno to być zawsze highway=path. Ja w takich przypadkach nie dodaję footway=sidewalk, bo według wiki stosuje się to w przypadku highway=footway. Jednak gdy jest już utworzony path i ma footway=sidewalk, to raczej nie usuwam tego tagu.
cserpell (2022-07-20 13:53:40+00:00): Muy buen aporte! Voy a preguntar en el grupo de telegram si es correcto etiquetar las letras así (Bienvenidos a La Calera)
Big Frank (2022-07-20 19:01:03+00:00): Gracias cserpell, lo unico que me dio la seguridad de hacer eso fue que así lo hicieron en el cartel de Hollywood en California.
cserpell (2022-07-20 20:30:37+00:00): Efectivamente, aunque ahí las letras sí son esculturas volumétricas, en cambio en el caso de La Calera son trazos en el cerro, no esculturas, por eso me entra la duda.
Big Frank (2022-07-20 20:54:04+00:00): Si observas imagines de las letras de cerca se puede observar que si es una estructura, no están pintadas al suelo, por lo menos desde mi punto de vista si debería estar categorizado de esa forma.
felipeeugenio (2022-07-21 20:24:14+00:00): Hola. Voy a consultar esto con otros maperos. Revisé el cartel de Hollywood. no puede estar bien como está dibujado. Es una sola escultura. Quizas se puede hacer una relación. O hace un tag para un todo. No puede ser que cada letra sea una atracción turística.

por lo pronto te pido por favor unirte al chat de la comunidad en Telegram en el link https://t.me/OSMcl. que es donde se conversan todas estas cosas.

saludos
Big Frank (2022-07-21 20:49:21+00:00): Yo ya estoy en ese grupo, no te parece que cada letra cuente como una escultura?
felipeeugenio (2022-07-21 21:48:45+00:00): Hola. Cuál es tu nombre en el chat? que bueno que estás.
Respecto del tag a usar. no me parece para nada. pero es una opinión y la verdad es que no me imagino en este minuto cómo hacerlo.
Por lo pronto, está apareciendo esto como 10 esculturas distintas, cada una como una atracción turística. Eso me hace ruido.
felipeeugenio (2022-07-21 22:46:56+00:00): Además, para ser sincero, no es lo mismo mundialmente el cartel de hollywood que el de la calera. Por muy estructuras que sean las de la calera, no es lo mismo que una obra de arte.
Hay un tag que es man_made que puede calzar con esto. voy a revisar cuando tenga un minuto
felipeeugenio (2022-07-21 22:48:15+00:00): En todo caso está bien que ha hayas revisado en otras partes del mundo. esa es la actitud. No estamos criticando tu edición. Solo que hay dudas como las ha habido con muchas cosas a lo largo de los años. No pasa nada grave.
Big Frank (2022-07-21 23:04:26+00:00): Entendible, soy BIG FRANK en telegram.
NieWnen (2022-08-01 16:11:17+00:00): Zmiana wycofana (124354055)
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-01 16:53:32+00:00): proszę, nie rób takich testów

tak, te dane się zapisują
silversurfer83 (2022-07-21 14:29:41+00:00): Hi,
diese Änderung zieht sich einmal quer von der belgischen Küste bis nach Polen hinein. Daher meine kleine Bitte: Bei StreetComplete bitte die Änderungen hochladen, bevor ein neues Gebiet bearbeitet wird, so dass die Änderungssätze geografisch kompakt bleiben :)
Weiter frohes Mappen
-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123844986
silversurfer83 (2022-07-21 14:29:44+00:00): Hi,
diese Änderung zieht sich einmal quer von der belgischen Küste bis nach Polen hinein. Daher meine kleine Bitte: Bei StreetComplete bitte die Änderungen hochladen, bevor ein neues Gebiet bearbeitet wird, so dass die Änderungssätze geografisch kompakt bleiben :)
Weiter frohes Mappen
-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123844986
Frans S (2022-08-01 10:09:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123845097
Load Mate (2022-07-20 11:07:17+00:00): LOADMATE offer manual trolley, beam trolleys, chain hoist trolley, geared trolley and push trolley. Contact us on 9687614356 for more detail.
archie (2022-07-20 11:07:28+00:00): Grüzzi! Die Tagg-Kombination name	=Risebo+place=hamlet ist eine Angabe über Ortschaft usw die aus offiziellen Quellen stammt und gelegentlich von schwedischen usern aktualisiert wird. 
Diese Taggs stehen nicht zu deiner Disposition. Du hast zum wiederholten Mal diese Taggs für deine privaten poi angewand. Bitte unterlass dies.
NieWnen (2022-08-01 16:11:13+00:00): Zmiana wycofana (124354055)
legofahrrad (2022-07-31 20:59:56+00:00): Moin und vielen Dank für den Eintrag zu OpenStreetMap.
Die Änderung scheint ein wenig merkwürdig, da das Gebäude jetzt die Information trägt, null Geschosse zu haben. Normalerweise haben Gebäude mindestens ein Vollgeschoss und ein Dachgeschoss. Wie sieht es hier aus?
Außerdem sollte beachtet werde, dass hier keine Eigenschaft für eine Firma ergänzt wurde. Häufig ist ein "office=company" passend. Weitere Infos gibt es im OSM Wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite
Bei Fragen nicht zögern, gerne hier einfach einen Kommentar verfassen.
Viele Grüße!
user_2066394 (2022-07-20 15:17:52+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2123510215
Die Hausnummer hat es verzogen.
user_2066394 (2022-08-12 08:41:56+00:00): zurückgeschoben
NieWnen (2022-08-01 16:11:04+00:00): Zmiana wycofana (124354055)
pyram (2022-07-22 20:55:42+00:00): Hallo Bodo Kubrak,

schön, dass Du hier mithelfen willst.
Eine Namensänderung auf Verdacht sollte man aber nicht machen. Die Kirche hier hatte eigentlich schon den richtigen Namen: https://www.bistum-eichstaett.de/glaube-und-leben/wallfahrtsorte/mettendorf-st-anna/
( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239729905/history )
Oder hast Du hier so vertiefte Ortskenntnisse, dass Du dem Bistum widersprechen könntest ;-)

Gruß
pyram
Patchanka (2022-07-20 12:01:55+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue
merci pour l'ajout du point d'eau, bien utile en cette saison !
Une petite remarque, je pense que vous avez par erreur modifié le poteau incendie qui est juste à côté. Vous me confirmez que ce n'était pas volontaire ?
Tony PIRES (2022-07-20 12:55:29+00:00): en effet, ce n'était pas volontaire, il est toujours la
Patchanka (2022-07-22 06:59:22+00:00): ok j'ai fait la petite correction.
Merci pour votre ajout et votre réponse. N'hésitez pas à faire d'autres contributions :-)

Si besoin de plus d'infos :
- le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Page_principale
- le forum https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

bonne journée
MxxCon (2022-07-20 17:36:20+00:00): Hotel changed name and branding and downgraded a star, yet kept the phone number?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123846370
PropertyVIEW® (2022-07-22 06:57:06+00:00): Yes, correct.
d1sr4n (2022-07-25 16:36:50+00:00): Y a-t-il une bonne raison de faire de changesets ce géant ? Je dirais que plusieurs packages plus localisés seraient plus préférables...

Il y avait des erreurs de géométrie autour de Syktyvkar, je les ai corrigées du mieux que j'ai pu.
iWowik (2022-07-29 08:56:38+00:00): 1) 180e Meredian en Tchoukotka
2) Je vais réparer Syktyvkar
Puxan (2022-10-15 09:52:56+00:00): Hola, veo que has añadido una fuente a la calle Ses Moreres de Maó. Me temo que la fuente que has añadido es la misma que ya estaba en el mapa, pero a unos 10 metros de distancia y que está en el mapa desde el 2014. Creo que lo suyo sería eliminar la fuente que has mapeado y desplazar la antigua al emplazamiento actual.  Espero tu respuesta sin modificar nada. Un saludo, Joaquim
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123846501
ansuta (2022-10-15 15:02:09+00:00): ¿Como te va? Así es. Usando Osmand no vi la otra fuente y por eso la puse. El lugar correcto es donde la puse yo. Para cercionarme estoy mirando las fotos de fachada y coíncide el lugar. No te preocupes, borro la mía y la otra la pongo donde la puse yo.
Saludos
Puxan (2022-10-16 08:38:14+00:00): De acuerdo. Gracias. Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123846501
user_2066394 (2022-07-20 15:26:51+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.

Die Proportionen der beiden Hälften passen?
jtracey (2022-07-20 22:01:52+00:00): This seems like the tagging was correct before? There are 3 lanes, one forward, two backward, one of which is a bus lane. Reverting.
emanueli_telenav (2022-07-21 08:27:16+00:00): Thank you for your information.
Yes, that was my mistake. Sorry about that.
Do you have any free local data to improve OSM map?
Best regards, Emanuel.
Pioko (2022-09-11 20:13:24+00:00): Jakie jest źródło informacji o tym, że szlak ten nazywa się Niebieskim szlakiem rowerowym? Gdzie się zaczyna i kończy?
Pozdrawiam
hetmantom (2022-09-11 20:40:31+00:00): Oznaczenia na drzewie na tym szlaku są naniesione niebieski kolor lini z rowerem/
Pioko (2022-09-12 05:47:04+00:00): Dróg nie nazywamy nazwami szlaków, które przez nie przebiegają. Do tego celu służą relacje. Jeśli dostępne są informacje na temat całego szlaku, proszę dodać ten szlak do tej drogi jako relację, a nie jako jej nazwę.
eggie (2022-07-20 15:57:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. (Je commentaar: Eenrichtingsfietspad is in werkelijkheid tweerichtings fietspad ) Maar het was hier toch correct getagd met oneway=no ?
Waarom dat dan veranderen?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-20 16:07:02+00:00): oneway=no heb ik weer toegevoegd. We doen dat om te voorkomen dat een medemapper oneway=yes gaat toevoegen aan dit soort fietspaden.
Gr eggie
GunSmoker (2022-08-16 20:32:33+00:00): А что вот с этими тропинками случилось?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47505556#map=18/56.84175/35.76665
eggie (2022-07-20 16:02:45+00:00): Oke  
Scherp.... Goed gevonden.. Dat routeerde niet meer correct

Hier heb ik foot=no ook verwijderd.. bicycle=yes is al default.. Dat hoef je niet te taggen. 

MVG
eggie
skyper (2022-07-26 15:24:07+00:00): Hi jospyck
I think you missed the correct and oldest object, the area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220410672)? If you try to tag individual constructions, please, take at look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground.
Cheers skyper