piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:04:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93083435
Frans S (2020-10-27 10:21:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93083642
Nzau (2024-01-13 21:07:16+00:00): Salut Zingeuner,

Je me suis permis de t'envoyer un message personnel au sujet de ton utilisation du tag source.

En espérant pouvoir échanger à ce sujet,
Nzau.
Glassman (2020-10-27 17:18:19+00:00): Tip: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93083899
VlIvYur (2021-10-07 17:24:31+00:00): Откуда данные по высотам домов?Есть стойкое подозрение что они получены путём умножения количества этажей на 3-что далеко от истины
fndoder (2021-10-09 19:28:22+00:00): Именно умножением на 3, да. С фактической ситуацией на местности не бьётся (сегодня проверял). Кстати, этажности добавленные пользователем nawernoe тоже левые (не сходятся с местностью).

Можно было бы откатить всю пачку пакетов правок. Но много времени прошло, конфликтов множество образуется.

Проще высоты выпилить, а этажности постепенно актуализировать.
syntex (2020-10-29 15:53:01+00:00): Z ciekawości, skąd ten numer węzła Przyczółkowa ?
Frans S (2020-10-27 10:06:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93084223
user_4493657 (2020-10-26 23:32:47+00:00): Cekcyn i okolice poprawki
Andrea Musuruane (2020-10-27 08:39:55+00:00): Ciao. Vedo che è stato spostato di diverse decine di metri il confine preso dai dati ISTAT tra Scopa e Guardabosone. Mi piacerebbe capirne il motivo. Grazie, Andrea
popilen (2020-10-27 23:24:45+00:00): La mappa catastale di Scopa posiziona il confine con Guardabosone sulla cresta, dai Denti di Valmala alla Sella del Badile.
Frans S (2020-10-27 10:02:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93084428
Karol_S (2020-10-27 21:25:36+00:00): Dzięki, właśnie zniknął z renderu po ostatnich edycjach i mi się coś nie podobało
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:04:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93084629
Frans S (2020-10-27 09:27:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93084827
Frans S (2020-10-27 09:33:19+00:00): Hi. Another remark. 
This is a building only project. Please focus on buildings.  
In this areas a trace like this should be tagged as highwy=path.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93084827
fndoder (2021-10-05 02:14:21+00:00): На заметку: обсуждение отката внесения фиктивных высот:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=842842#p842842

Если будут комментарии, прошу написать тут или в обсуждении на форуме.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-10-27 08:37:45+00:00): Ciao. Non mi piace molto l'idea di aggiungere un ? nel tag name delle località di cui non si è sicuri del nome. Forse meglio aggiungere un tag fixme o non mettere niente? Ciao, Andrea
popilen (2020-10-27 23:28:08+00:00): Il punto di domanda è provvisorio, lo metto per intendermi con gli altri collaboratori che stanno esplorando quella zona.
A chiarimento avvenuto oggi ho riposizionato i toponimi e tolto i punti di domanda
Frans S (2020-10-27 10:10:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.
Frans S (2020-10-27 10:14:47+00:00): iD Editor: Be aware that iD editor hides OSM features from view to enhance performance. There is a blue notice that appears at the bottom of iD Editor indicating whether OSM features are being hidden. Zoom in until no features are hidden before editing. This will ensure you are not duplicating existing mapping.
To be honest, You mapped nearly all buildings for the 2nd time, so duplicating existing mappings.
Please improve your mapping skills as well. Your mappings are rather inaccurate and not squared. 
See this document which might help to improve your mapping skills.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping

Best regards and keep mapping
PlaneMad (2020-11-02 17:53:01+00:00): Wonderful effort mapping all these villages.

Curious about the use of localised tags like `place:ta` . Any specific reason to add them?
Frans S (2020-10-31 15:05:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)
update 28 october 2020:  Project imagery should load automaticly at opening of a task.

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.
tordans (2020-10-27 06:04:43+00:00): Hallo! Kannst du mir bitte erklären, warum die die Daten gelöscht hast? VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93085703
engersd (2020-10-28 07:50:17+00:00): Das waren Adresstags a) ohne Objektbezug (Straße, Gebäude, etc.) und b) ohne Inhalt
tordans (2020-10-30 05:55:28+00:00): Hallo engersd, danke für die Antwort. Ich habe die Adressen jetzt wiederhergestellt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93268613). Die Straßen sind als highway=planned eingetragen und gerade im Bau. Die Hausnummern stammen aus dem Bebauungsplan (siehe source-Tag an den Nodes). Den Straßennamen habe ich leer gelassen, da mir noch nicht bekannt (vgl. Hinweis in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88401201). Das ganze ist ein Baugebiet und wird gerade aktiv bearbeitet. Gebäude stehen noch nicht; die Hausnummern stehen aber dort, wo die Flurstücke ausgeschrieben sind laut Bebauungsplan. – Es ist meiner Meinung nach völlig legitim diese Daten jetzt schon einzutragen und zu ergänzen, sobald neue Informationen verfügbar sind; ich werde es dann updaten.

Grundsätzlich ist meine Bitte, im Fall von Löschungen wie diesen vorab auf dem letzten Changeset ein Gespräch zu starten; der vorherige Mapper hat sich eigentlich immer etwas dabei gedacht, über das man sprechen kann, bevor man etwas löscht (oder auch nachdem man etwas gelöscht hat, als Rückversicherung).

Viele Grüße und weiterhin frohes Mappen in der Region! Es freut mich sehr, dass dort eine weitere Person aktiv ist! :-)
gscholz (2020-12-01 05:48:31+00:00): Hi qualhano,
your recent edits have left behind a significant amount of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-45.09590&lat=-9.95427&zoom=9&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you probably know not connected ways can not be used by routing software.
Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
martiensch (2021-03-21 10:03:51+00:00): Hi,

Which convention are you referring to? I am not sure why details like population are to be excluded from the place tag.

Regards,
Martien
ZeLonewolf (2021-03-21 12:47:11+00:00): Hi, the convention I was referring to was the fact that the place node and boundary relation were separate (I combined them).  You're right about the population tag, it looks from the wiki that it's supposed to be on the place node as well, and not just on the relation.  I just copied that over, so should be all set now!
Dimacn (2020-10-28 11:52:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Пожалуйста удалите текст из тега name
mueschel (2020-10-28 09:06:50+00:00): Hi,
you added two objects with a large number of foreign tags - could you check that?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8049003628
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864013294
user_5359 (2020-10-30 05:16:25+00:00): Hello! Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys. See https://www.osm.org/way/864013294 and https://www.osm.org/node/8049003628.
Shawn Noble (2020-11-02 02:50:47+00:00): Completely missed that in my cleanup. That was never meant to be published. That is very terribly formatted metadata in a format technically usable my the database. It is not meant for publication, and slipped my review process. I appreciate the quick action to correct it. I'm reviewing any edits I have made recently for similar errors, and will review my edit process to ensure I am following standards etc. as expected.
Frans S (2020-10-27 13:55:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here,
First. You use the Bing imagery. Maxar Premium is prescribed.
This is a building only project. So Look for buildings rather than  paths.
Btw. The path you mapped is actually a dry riverbed. I retag it.
Best regards
Frans S (2020-10-27 11:57:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93087188
iandees (2020-10-27 02:52:57+00:00): Do you know if anything replaced it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93087196
TaylorBreaksTheInternet (2020-10-27 12:32:38+00:00): Looks like a restaurant called como park grill took its place but that is also out of business. I might drive by this weekend to see what is going on.
TaylorBreaksTheInternet (2020-11-03 12:22:44+00:00): as of November 1st, 2020, this building is not occupied but available for lease.
karson_ (2020-10-27 12:49:57+00:00): Can you outline what exactly you are trying to accomplish? It seems you have made a large number of edits on this particular road, changing the tags each time.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93087389
Jeff Carroll (2020-10-27 12:59:09+00:00): I am very very new to OpenStreetMap mapping, or any other mapping.   What I'm trying to do is map the plan I work at to get directions for forklift drivers.  When I "save" the changes, I don't see them on the map.  All of those changes are my attempts at changing the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93087389
karson_ (2020-10-27 13:47:15+00:00): So a few notes:
1. I would recommend you stick with using the iD editor. This is the easiest to use and makes it hard to mess things up.
2. For imagery, it looks like Esri Clarity is the best in your location. In the iD editor, you can change the imagery you use by pressing 'B'. Select "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta".
3. If you are adding roads on the plant grounds, you should use the "service road" preset. The highway=service will indicate the priority (low) and will cause it to render on the map.
4. The map uses slippy tiles for rendering. As soon as you upload a changeset, the database will reflect the changes you made. This means a routing service would instantly be able to use added roads. It may take a few days for the rendered map to reflect changes you make.

Could you possibly try and further clarify your use case? You are trying to add the paths forklift drivers navigate around the plant? If they work at the factory then why do they need directions?
Jeff Carroll (2020-10-27 13:58:44+00:00): It's a 40+ acre campus with about 50 places people can store items during the manufacture process.  I want to place a tag by each location including the lat long coordinates, that will be written to our ERP system stating where this part was placed.  Then the next forklift diver can pull this entry up in the ERP system, click on the location entry and get directions to the item.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93087389
karson_ (2020-10-27 16:04:25+00:00): OpenStreetMap doesn't sound like the right application for your use case. Maybe Leaflet? You should make a post here, https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=10 . Ensure that you thoroughly describe all of the details involved. I am sure someone can give you a recommendation of a good way to accomplish what you want to do.
Jeff Carroll (2020-10-27 16:11:22+00:00): I am using Leaflet, but the map isn't updated with the plant information.  Thanks for the info, I'll post it on the forum and see what happens.
Frans S (2020-10-27 11:55:30+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.
Inaccurate and not squared buildings.
You overlooked round buildings.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-10-27 11:55:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93087409
Frans S (2020-10-27 11:51:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93087613
Frans S (2020-10-27 11:51:57+00:00): The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.
Not accurate enough and not squared.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93087613
nevw (2020-10-28 09:57:36+00:00): Hi
I reverted changeset 93087660 which broke multipolygon relation and added a golf sand bunker over a large part of Whitsunday Island and marine area.
TheMoneyTour (2020-12-15 20:32:18+00:00): Apologies I was working on a project. I meant to revert them.
Dimacn (2020-10-28 11:54:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Пожалуйста удалите текст из тега name
Dimacn (2020-10-28 11:49:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Пожалуйста удалите текст из тега name
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:01:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93089269
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:01:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93089269
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
Frans S (2020-10-28 10:22:28+00:00): Hi. Thanks for mapping here 
A remark. 
You only mapped rectangular buildings here.
Why did you map not all round buildings?
There are lots of round huts here to map
You forgot to round the triangles you have drawn by hitting the O key. 
See these picures for help mapping round buildings
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bb5HOnaEkQjmjoHv1dX2jbNhyJSKvKEz/view?usp=sharing
rtbk (2020-10-27 06:04:37+00:00): Thanks for Fixing up the Admin Boundaries.

With the church ground I thought i had done it right by putting in the gate, surrounded by a fence, with the multipolygon tagged with the denomination, landuse and religion.
I see that it is now throwing an error in JOSM. Are you able to look into that?
XaMi (2020-10-30 06:04:04+00:00): If private properties are mapped, it's highly recommended to add appropriate access tags. Please be aware of this in the future. In this case I've already added it.
ErraticThunder (2020-10-31 02:21:20+00:00): Hi XaMi,
Thank you for looking into my edit. I had made this edit based on the GPS traces of our driver partner. I could not find any evidence of this road being customers as it lacked street imagery and no evidence in aerial view. Thanks for adding access.  would be happy to learn from the community. 
Regards,
asnghpi
mueschel (2020-10-31 09:13:33+00:00): Hi,
could you explain this?
  charge = 0
  fee = yes
There is a fee, but it is 0?
gmckone (2020-11-03 03:08:18+00:00): Hi there. An account is needed and it could have a cost in the future but currently the re is no charge. What can you recommend I do to improve how EV chargers are tagged I have not found very good examples yet.  Eg people will want to know there is a j1772 plug etc. ( it is a level 2 quick charger)

Thanks for your help.