piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
adrianojbr (2016-07-30 12:41:47+00:00): olá, flávio. blz? nesse changeset vc apagou o supermercado schmidt do mapa em itapema. esse mercado fechou? o prédio não existe mais? abraço.
aaronsta (2016-07-28 12:13:47+00:00): Road previously classed as trunk as it was deemed a "dual-carriageway". While this road section is a dual carriageway this is not a classification of Main Roads (MRWA) Beyond Safety Bay Rd and Kwinana Freeway intersection the road is no longer a road with Control of Access. If the logic of “being a dual-carriageway” is used then beyond Safety Bay Road it should be classed as a trunk road. Sometimes it is not appropriate to use the statutory road classification. As a result this section of road is a motorway as it has some limited access aspects to it.
aceman444 (2020-11-10 13:50:41+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za info. Ale objekt (tu skolu) neoznacite za nefunkcnu tym, ze jej to napisete do nazvu (a najlepsie na kazdu budovu). To ziadna aplikacia (a ani cudzinci) nepochopi. Je potrebne deaktivovat znacku amenity=school, lebo ako vidite, dodnes sa javi ako funkcna skola. Zmenim to teda na disused:amenity=school, ako ste to mali urobit.
5m4u9 (2016-07-29 06:11:51+00:00): En la rotonda, el área verde es más correcto definir como césped (landuse=grass) o quizá jardín si hay flores (leisure=graden)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434360533
literan (2016-07-28 13:09:05+00:00): Правильно не tunnel=yes (это для полноценных транспортных туннелей), а tunnel=building_passage
user_5359 (2016-07-28 17:31:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add more detail information about your business. Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
Sergey Bronnikov (2016-08-06 16:17:50+00:00): В чем проблема?
literan (2016-08-07 20:19:09+00:00): в том, что вы поставили точки магазина напитков и туалета прямо на футбольном поле. Как могут сосуществовать эти сущности?
Sergey Bronnikov (2016-08-07 21:06:38+00:00): На самом деле не весь овал это футбольное поле (или вы может видели овальные футбольные поля?) там где стоят мои точки это площадка с турниками (http://imgur.com/a/f3QXi). А администритивное здание с туалетом и магазином напитком находится правее.

Тем не менее, вы все еще считаете, что нужно молча откатывать всё, что вам не понравилось?
literan (2016-08-07 21:46:21+00:00): Учитывая, что 25% правок из maps.me мусор, и 95% пользователей этой программы не отвечают на сообщения, т.к. авторизованы через соцсети - да, считаю, что мусор, внесенный через эту программу следует молча откатывать, не тратя время, которое можно потратить на совершенствование карты, на разговор со стенами. Перейдем к делу: где конкретно находится здание с магазином прохладительных напитков и туалетом? можете поставить заметку в этом месте (раз уж вы поставили эти точки не в том месте, где они находятся фактически)?
Sergey Bronnikov (2016-08-08 08:21:16+00:00): 
План выглядит так - http://imgur.com/a/4btc2
Позднее тогда отмечу.
literan (2016-08-08 09:52:59+00:00): Да, по плану мало что поймешь. Если не сложно, скорректируйте тогда и форму футбольного поля, беговых дорожек, чтобы, действительно не было овалов (как пример - http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.82806/37.32556 )
user_5359 (2016-07-28 17:27:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t add a address node to the middle of street. Please move him to the right side of the street.
infeeeee (2025-09-28 11:15:06+00:00): Szia!

Mi a forrásod erre a névre? Egyesek nagyon le akarják törölni.
Térképszerkesztő (2025-09-30 13:11:13+00:00): Szia!

Az 57/2013. (XII.21.) önkormányzati rendelet tartalmazza a nevet, tehát használatban van és az e-közmű is hoz rá találatot.
infeeeee (2025-09-30 13:14:33+00:00): Köszi!
Op'tRad (2025-07-20 13:32:11+00:00): Hello Mr. Gray,
Changed the 'historic' tag again.
If you look for a tag, just type 'osm tag boundary stone' - or whatever else.
I changed this myself because you were very long inactive. Greetings, Werner
bkil (2016-10-25 17:31:39+00:00): Thanks for your great efforts. Could you please fill in your profile page or write a blog entry so we can know a bit more about you?
trigpoint (2016-07-28 14:02:58+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Please could you provide some more information, like what its the site of.

Thanks
chnav (2017-03-01 03:22:17+00:00): Здравствуйте, в этой правке вы исправляли границу Казахстан-Россия. Вы пододвинули значимую точку из текста Соглашения на 900 метров, что недопустимо.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2309910815

Также вы рисуете границу извилистой линией, хотя если следовать тексту документа - это прямые отрезки. В документах четко указано - прямой отрезок или вдоль полевой дороги или вдоль русла реки, поэтому вольная трактовка тут недопустима - нельзя рисовать вдоль проселочной дороги, если в Соглашении о госгранице говорится "по прямой".
Также контрольно-следовые полосы (если видимы на спутн.снимке) не являются точным положением линии границы: КСП являются _преградой_ и могут находиться как на территории одной, так и другой стороны.

Пожалуйста смотрите историю правок и контактируйте с местными маперами прежде чем вносить такие значительные изменения.

chnav
DUGA (2021-05-27 23:13:24+00:00): It makes no sense, fixed:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434371180#map=19/39.69497/-78.87849
muralito (2016-07-28 19:55:09+00:00): Antonio, no serian bus_stop lo que quisiste agregar
Graf Westerholt (2017-03-18 12:14:55+00:00): Das Elisabeth-Krankenhaus ist jetzt mehrmals eingetragen, als Fläche, als Relation und als Gebäude.

„Befindet sich das Krankenhaus auf einem Gelände und besteht aus mehreren Gebäuden ("Krankenhaus-Campus"), wird nicht jedes Gebäude einzeln als "Krankenhaus" ausgezeichnet. Stattdessen wird das Areal als Fläche mit dem Tag amenity=hospital ausgezeichnet und der Name sowie alle anderen möglichen Angaben werden ebenfalls hier angegeben. Die einzelnen Gebäude können mit dem Tag building=hospital gekennzeichnet werden.“

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=hospital

Wäre schön, wenn du es berichtigen würdest.
EdLoach (2016-07-28 15:42:35+00:00): Hi. I noticed your edit and thought maybe you'd like to also set "Allowed Access" to private as well as (or perhaps instead of) the name. This will cause the "P" shown on the standard rendering to be paler than public car parks.
BCNorwich (2016-07-30 05:42:25+00:00): Removed the name=Private from two car parks. They may be private but there is no suggestion that they are officially or otherwise named "Private". Also added access=private tags.
SHARCRASH (2016-10-18 20:23:42+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remarqué que vous avez changé le tag de ce sentier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405395258/history
Or Footway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway 
implique un chemin avec une structure à surface plane strictement réservé aux pédestres (sauf précisions) alors que Path 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath s'applique à des chemins pédestres particuliers (sentiers, chemin non spécifique pour cyclistes piétons et chevaux, etc) Il est impératif de suivre ces références sinon les personnes sont induites en erreur lorsqu'ils regardent une carte qui prend en compte ces détails. Merci de votre compréhension!
SHARCRASH (2016-10-18 20:25:00+00:00): Aussi, aucun besoin d'ajouter foot=yes si le chemin est de base destiné aux piétons. Logique! ;)
Alecs01 (2016-07-28 18:51:45+00:00): Hi, "Outlet" is probably the correct spelling rather than aytlet/Autlet; a car dealer inside a brand new hotel building looks strange too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4325331390 can you explain what did you mean?
GerdP (2017-08-28 09:39:21+00:00): Hi!
I stumbled over a few ways with highway=motorway_junction. I started to change them to motorway_link but now I wonder why you changed BR-277 from trunk to motorway. The sat images clearly do not show a motorway with separate lanes. See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence
chfranca (2017-08-28 13:50:11+00:00): Olá, eu segui as recomendações do projeto de mapeamento de rodovias do Brasil. Se houver erros, por favor, fique a vontade para editar.
Radek Dobiáš (2016-08-14 21:28:54+00:00): Dobrý den,
budovu co tu stála než byl nově vytvořen objekt 434395806 jsem označil jako zdemolovanou podle skutečného stavu. Co mělo za smysli budovu odstranit a doplnit nově? Díky za vysvětlení.
JandaM (2016-08-15 06:28:58+00:00): Dobry den,
 dekuji za dotaz. Omlouvam se ale ke zmene na existujici budovu nedoslo zamerne. Snazim se opravit data v OSM pomoci budov z RUIAN. V OSM je momentalne spousta posunutych a nepresnych budov coz je pro me pouziti docela velky problem.
Nektere budovy maji chybne stare pretrasovani. Jine jsou obkreslene z Bingu - ty jsou uplne nepouzitelne (nesedi pozice ani tvar).

Prosim muzete doplnit TAGy tak jak maji byt. Zjistil jsem ze budovu je pretrasoval bez historie coz normalne nedelam.
  Dekuji
   Martin
Radek Dobiáš (2016-08-21 12:15:36+00:00): Martine, děkuji vám za vysvětlení. Držím palce v další práci s OSM. Hezký den
Radek
Supaplex (2016-07-28 16:44:21+00:00): 這是牛排店還是旅館？
kreuzschnabel (2017-09-27 07:30:39+00:00): Lässt sich das ford=yes an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60207306 noch spezifizieren oder ist das über die gesamte Länge eine Furt?
whb (2016-08-06 08:20:48+00:00): Der Name ist nur der Name (keine Beschreibungen oder Adressen):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Danke!
Refrigerator (2016-08-06 12:21:27+00:00): Im Neuenheimer Feld ist Gebäudenummer eigentlich Teil des Namens. Oft wird auch nur die Nummer für ein Gebäude verwendet.
http://www.studentenwerk.uni-heidelberg.de/en/node/245
http://www.geog.uni-heidelberg.de/lageplan.html
http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/md/studium/imstudium/ankunft/lageplan_inf.pdf
Beim größten teil der Daten im Feld habe ich nicht die Nummer hinzugefügt, sondern die eigentliche Nutzung des Gebäudes (Institut für soundso)
whb (2016-08-07 09:18:37+00:00): Nein, das stimmt nicht.
Zwar ist "INF #" in seltenen Fällen Teil des Eigennamens, wie bei dem einen oder anderen Wohnheim (z.B. "INF 129"), aber meistens ist dem nicht so.
Die "Chirurgische Klinik" heißt sicher nicht "Chirurgische Klinik INF 106, INF 110 - 112", das "Heizkraftwerk Heidelberg" heißt sicher nicht "Heizkraftwerk Heidelberg INF 530 - 531".
Ebenso:
"Medizinische Klinik INF 410"
"Kinderklinik INF 430 , INF 470"
"Kopfklinik INF 400"
"Frauen- und Hautklinik INF 440"
Diese Liste ist nicht abschließend.

Das ist hier auch schön ersichtlich:
https://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/fileadmin/Gesamtklinikum_CD/Anfahrtsplaene/Lageplan_INF.pdf

Auch in dieser Liste enthält keiner der Namen "INF #":
https://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/gebaeude/plan_frame.php
Refrigerator (2016-08-08 10:56:43+00:00): Bei den Kliniken und den Gebäuden wie Heizkraftwerk oder KITAs seh ich ein, dass es Quatsch ist xD 
Allerdings wissen viele Leute nicht, dass INF für Im Neuenheimer Feld steht.
Da wäre es doch gut, wenn bei einer Suche nach INF # auch was angezeigt wird. 
Kann man dass dann wenigstens in den Alternativen Namen oder so reinschreiben ?

Im Feld ist es auch oft so, dass in einem Gebäude mehrere Institute drin sind.
Soll mann dann alle Namen in den Name tag schreiben und mit Komma abtrennen, oder was soll man da dann machen ?
kartler175 (2016-11-01 11:03:43+00:00): Bei Änderunngen von Straßeneigenscheafte keine neuen Wege zeichenen, sondern bestehende Abschnitte ändern. JOSM-Validator nicht ignorieren.
Jan van Bekkum (2018-01-14 09:24:37+00:00): The Hotel Mirador was already in place. The one you added is a duplicate on top of the campground that I added. Hotel Mirador provides camping services in its yard.
Supaplex (2016-07-28 16:47:09+00:00): 這是周遊各駕訓班的成果嗎XDD
Kagami (2016-07-29 01:30:46+00:00): 你答對了
Alecs01 (2016-08-12 11:59:28+00:00): What is that? please note your edits go directly to the OpenStreetMap database
TrickyB (2016-07-28 16:13:56+00:00): Incorrect title, should be 'adjusting usage of Broxted Solar Farm Footpath'
TrickyB (2016-07-28 16:13:23+00:00): Incorrect title, should be 'adjusting usage of Broxted Solar Farm Footpath'
BCNorwich (2016-07-30 05:59:05+00:00): Also you now have two highways along here. Neither of which join to the end of what is named Hall Road. My information shows this section also to be named Hall Road which continues to the cattle grid to the east.
DaxServer (2017-04-06 12:32:37+00:00): To-Update: It's actually "బొర్రా గుహలు"
TFTD (2019-10-01 15:17:26+00:00): Ist dieses Wegsegement echt so vohanden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302754881#map=16/47.1594/10.2489&layers=N
FrischLuftWege (2019-10-27 16:53:19+00:00): Definitiv nein
Supaplex (2016-07-28 18:06:44+00:00): 讚！增加很多商家
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-07-29 05:43:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice: You forgot to add any information to your ways.

If you need help: You are welcome.
schleuss (2016-07-28 18:03:17+00:00): So quick! Thanks for cleaning up these.
Fanny IRM-ED (2020-07-27 04:02:52+00:00): Hi Kathy Sinai, I've change the unspecific highway tag as residential highway. Thank you
woodpeck (2016-09-03 20:47:48+00:00): This changeset looks very similar to a number of semi-automatic changesets by contributors working for Facebook that have been reverted because of low quality and a process violation (imports must be discussed before they are performed). Can you explain the process by which you extracted these ~ 8500 ways from DigitalGlobe, and why every way has only two nodes?
IlBano (2016-09-14 10:06:45+00:00): Hi Fredie.
While fixing things highlighted by Osmose I saw this changeset of yours which in my opinion has several problems. Just to name a few which I discovered:
- natural=* and landuse=* sharing nodes with highways. When you map for example a natural=grassland it's an error to extend the area over an asphalted highway (see way 434482135)
- overlapping landuse. You mapped an area with grass and inside the same area you put another polygon marked with landuse=industrial. How can the same area be both at the same time ? (see ways 434483053, 434483333)
- node with nonsense names. See node id 582930277 for instance. In this case you copied something from CTR Lombardia in a wrong way. "E N U T A A G R I C O L A P I R O C C O" in name tag resembles Italian, but it is not. Moreover why did you re-use a node of the boundary ?
- way 391988734 was a man_made=wastewater_plant that you changed tolanduse=industrial. Moreover you marked a node of this way with man_made=wastewater_plant and disused=yes. Why this ? Did you personally surveyed it in order to tell that it is no more used ? As I live locally I can tell you that this plant is still up and running
- way 434483022 was marked as landuse=retail and name="Grecchi". You cannot use a landuse to mark the presence of a specific business and use its name for the area. Name should be added on a building or on a node which better details what "Grecchi" is selling. In the same place there are also other businesses with other names
- way 402533257 was an area=yes that represented Piazza Arnaboldi. The parking was tagged though a node that you deleted. You transformed the area with a tag parking=yes, and you extended also it over the street where there's no parking. What's wrong with the way of mapping that you found before applying your changes ? Your parking "transformation" also applies to other ways that you deleted and replace with yours (402533256, 402533245 and 402533250 replaced by this generic rectangle 402533246)
- you deleted a lot of waterway=ditches which are still present on the field

I appreciate some of the modifications you made, but evidence say that in my opinion you don't have the required local knowledge to apply several of the changes you did, and in my understanding there's a lot of work to be done in order to set thing properly.
I will discuss this changeset in the local OSM mailing list and I'll evaluate to propose a revert since it appears far more easy to apply it than to look at every single change.

I hope you can understand my point.

Regards
user_5359 (2016-07-29 05:40:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: You forgot to add any information to your ways.
msevilla00 (2016-07-28 22:38:29+00:00): You added an other node it seems is not correctly tagged and no add information to OpenStreetMap. Please, check it, correct it and/or remove it.
msevilla00 (2016-07-29 08:17:53+00:00): I removed it for you. Cheers
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-07-29 01:07:22+00:00): Não precisa colocar o nome semáforo.
Marych_ (2016-08-01 14:52:20+00:00): Добрый день
Вы поменяли
Школа №253 - Колледж
Детский сад №494 - семейная поликлинка

А где тогда находятся 
Школа №253 
Детский сад №494
можете уточнить?
StefanB (2016-08-13 07:57:59+00:00): Res želiš da se pride razgledovati avtobus japonskih turistov? :-)
msevilla00 (2016-07-29 08:18:56+00:00): I also removed this node.
Cheers
user_5359 (2016-07-29 05:45:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed the high importance of a description: name only object’s are useless! I recommend the side http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a
t_ja (2016-07-28 21:02:41+00:00): Ahoj, preco si zmenil http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66339111/history a http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66338824/history z highway=track na road? Podla http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Droad sa pouziva vtedy, ked nie je zname, o aku cestu sa jedna. Kedze vies, ze to nie je polna cesta, musis aj vediet, aka cesta to je. Dalej si kvoli kusku lesa zmazal kompletne celu dolinu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112828961#map=14/49.3483/18.5705). Ak potrebujes zmenit len cast "landuse", treba existujucu plochu zmensit a do vzniknutej diery zakreslit novu plochu, napr. les. Prosim, poopravuj si tie chyby.
mavl (2016-07-29 16:51:30+00:00): В OpenStreetMap очень мало адресных данных. Большое спасибо за их добавление. Только к этому времени сложилась традиция по их заполнению. Например, буквы в номерах используют большие (19А, но не 19а). Правильно назвать улицу нужно «улица Гагарина». Общее правило: «улица Пушкина», но «Пушкинская улица». Это всё делается в целях единообразия, чтобы карты любых населённых пунктов выглядели одинаково. Эти недочёты я уже поправил. Возможно, вам будет интересно, что ещё можно обозначить количество этажей в здании тегом building:levels (например, building:levels=1).  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building:levels  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
ANAT01 (2016-08-02 16:10:51+00:00): Ок! Большое спасибо за исправления!
manings (2016-08-23 07:06:11+00:00): This is the last changeset that touched this forest multipolygon relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1299756/history


All members of the above relation don't have roles (inner/outer).
Владимир К (2016-07-29 11:25:41+00:00): Вы пытаетесь привлечь внимание коммунальщиков?
Владимир К (2016-07-29 11:39:40+00:00): Не нужно писать точки в конце названия. Зачем вы их ставите?
Tomas Straupis (2016-07-29 07:06:31+00:00): Šiukšlių konteineriai neturi pavadinimo :-)
Piskvor (2016-07-29 17:02:54+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41113938

Hello, OSM is a public database, please don't use it for personal notes; also, primary language in Prague is not Chinese.
Koun (2016-07-28 20:18:29+00:00): Erreur libellé groupe de modification : Belle-Ile (56) et non Montfort/Breteil (35)
simon04 (2016-07-31 07:43:37+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/642871
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-09-03 18:46:39+00:00): http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=181496455 - ulica Moniszki, gratuluję...
Tomas Straupis (2016-07-29 07:13:52+00:00): crap.me rubbish change in Vilnius reverted.
Derick Rethans (2016-07-29 09:13:05+00:00): Hammersmith is nowhere *near* here. Reverting this.
Walter Schlögl (2016-07-28 20:18:54+00:00): falls das eine Kirche ist, bitte als building=church erfassen, andernfalls besser als amenity=community_centre, arts_centre, ...
simon04 (2016-08-01 13:13:38+00:00): Wolltest du mit dir selbst eine Diskussion beginnen? ;) Oder bezieht sich der Kommentar auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40798222
mavl (2019-04-08 17:04:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
kartler175 (2016-12-03 23:15:34+00:00): Der 31. August ist längst vorüber. Was ist jetzt mit dem Abbiegeverbot?
sdoerr (2016-07-28 21:31:49+00:00): This isn't Kinshasa!
trigpoint (2017-01-18 19:11:26+00:00): Please see comments on note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/650624
The spelling does not match OS Opendata Locator or local tradition.
Thanks Phil
ACS1986 (2017-01-19 09:47:38+00:00): By bizarre coincidence I stopped at the premier inn next door earlier in the year and noticed the Dutch spelling at the time. Unless it has been changed Kopje is the spelling on the road sign
mapper999 (2016-07-29 18:25:14+00:00): Hi, the correct tagging for fire hydrants is emergeny=fire_hydrant not amenity.
mavl (2019-04-08 17:04:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-08 17:04:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-08 17:04:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
pfg21 (2016-09-08 08:27:43+00:00): Откуда появляется приписка (Южный) ??
В каком источнике они так обозначаются ??
Trockennasenaffe (2017-08-07 08:03:02+00:00): Ich verstehe den Hintergrund dieser Änderung nicht. Auf dem Haltestellenschild steht eindeutig Endstraße, siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.7971209713787&lng=6.155210679206577&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=nTVs0t0FlLviJF-KNR2-JA
Athalis (2016-07-30 11:06:31+00:00): s/westlich/östlich
FTA (2016-07-30 00:01:19+00:00): Hi there,

This is a *huge* amount of data added. Can you please provide some information about where you got this data? Is it licensed for use with OpenStreetMap? Is this from a company?

Best,
Ethan aka FTA
Hjart (2016-07-31 17:10:49+00:00): Ethan. A related post is https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Chetan_Gowda/diary/39149 (same user responsible for the data)
CrowdAtlas (2016-08-02 16:51:18+00:00): Ethan, Hjart, thank you for flagging out the quality issue.  The changeset is based on machine learnt roads using licensed DigitalGlobe high resolution data.  http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=55220
We have a manual curation process, but had new challenges recently as we move toward major cities in Egypt.   We are fully committed in improving the quality of the submitted roads to OSM standard.  But if you think a full revert is the best solution here, we'd be happy to provide all changeset ids as well.   Moving forward, we will dial down the algorithm and focus on major roads.  We'd love to collaborate, and hope we could work together to improve our approach.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-02 16:59:30+00:00): @CrowdAtlas presumably you represent Facebook?  As you suggested in http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=601445#p601445 I'd definitely suggest discussing an import of this sort with the wider OSM community, and the talk mailing list is probably the best way to reach them.
As well as in Egypt there were significant problems in Thailand http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54648 ; I'd definitely try and get this process right before you try importing 10k ways in each changeset (as has happened here).
Even if a revert isn't immediately needed a list of the relevant changesets would be useful for QA purposes.
Best Regards, 
Andy
CrowdAtlas (2016-08-02 19:27:51+00:00): Andy, apologies for not introducing myself.  I'm Yin from Facebook, who works on the machine learning algorithm for road improvement.  Thank you for your advice.  All our Thailand edits have been reverted and we will not submit any new road anywhere until we get the process right.  By talk mailing list, I assume you meant talk@openstreetmaplorg.  I'll start a thread there with our list of changesets.  Thanks.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-02 19:29:35+00:00): @CrowdAtlas yes, that's the one - thanks.