piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Irma IRM-ED (2021-07-09 03:10:22+00:00): Xin chào ff5722!
Cảm ơn bạn vì số hóa đã được thực hiện. Có cây cầu nào ở một số điểm xung quanh sông mà bạn chưa vào không?
Vui lòng kiểm tra https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/664652043

Chúc bạn lập bản đồ vui vẻ!
ff5722 (2021-07-09 09:54:09+00:00): Yes it's possible that a bridge was missing
Irma IRM-ED (2021-07-12 03:34:58+00:00): Thank for the confirmation, as a remote mapper it will be very helpful for the local mapper's contribution to fix this issue
Happy Mapping !
Irma IRM-ED (2021-07-12 03:35:24+00:00): Thank for the confirmation  ff5722 , as a remote mapper it will be very helpful for the local mapper's contribution to fix this issue
Happy Mapping !
mavl (2019-02-25 17:24:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
aceman444 (2020-03-29 08:13:18+00:00): Zdravim, preco ste ponicili kaplnky v Marianke a stupave? Preco ste poodstranovali amenity=place_of_worship a podoplnali nemyselne nazvy name=Kaplnka? Na Kalvarii pri kostole v Stupave ste preco odstranili religion?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-27 11:10:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110335556 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some historic MAPS.ME personal markers in Thailand.
AlaskaDave (2020-08-28 00:30:25+00:00): Hello,

You have added many wilderness_huts in this area. I think you are using that tag incorrectly. A wilderness_hut is located in wild country, usually accessible only on foot, is free and has sleeping facilities and sometimes even a fireplace or stove. Please read the description in the Wiki. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut

The huts you mapped are in towns. Why did you choose to map them that way? Are these places actually home stay guesthouses?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-27 11:10:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110335556 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some historic MAPS.ME personal markers in Thailand.
GinaroZ (2019-01-23 15:24:49+00:00): Hi, are you trying to add an address in this edit? Because number 9 is already mapped on the building.
Andreea Bnc (2019-01-23 17:07:01+00:00): Hi,

Yes, i have tried to add another point with the same address because if I try to search for directions from this point to another I can not find a route.
AlaskaDave (2020-10-23 12:08:58+00:00): These are NOT wilderness huts. Please read the Wiki for a definition of wilderness hots.

I deleted them.
tux67 (2019-01-21 13:03:44+00:00): wenn du das demolished:building benutzt, dann muß das building=yes weg und:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291914418
hier ist mit building und building_1 was ganz schief gelaufen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66457344
aceman444 (2021-05-02 18:39:31+00:00): Zdravim, preco odstranujete z kaplniek amenity=place_of_workship? Ak je to funkcna a pouzivana kaplnka, tak to je aj miesto uctievania. Alebo mate info, ze tu tie kaplnky opustene? Zo snimok Bing asi tazko, rovnako ako tam nemozete vidiet nazvy, ktore pridavate. Uvadzajte pravdive zdroje Vasich zmien.
mapperue (2021-05-03 05:03:07+00:00): Zdravím, tagy a zdroj sú doplnené.
tux67 (2019-01-21 13:01:06+00:00): Schau doch bitte mal das location tag an .. so ist das nicht gemeint:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:location?uselang=de
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66457596
Warin61 (2019-01-22 08:14:09+00:00): Hi
Way: 664664565 is a dead end. Don't see that on satellite views. Are you certain that Way: 664482493 is not a more correct representation? Next - you say cutting .. yet both look to be on the same level as teh road beside them -Victoria Parade. Next the have no connection with the cross street Clarendon Street ...

Way: 664651646 has no tag .. what is it?
LakatosVL (2019-02-18 10:08:30+00:00): Hi,
please can you answer to warin61 question.
Thanks
aceman444 (2021-05-04 00:06:48+00:00): Zravim, zase bez zmysluplneho zdroja a podla coho je Exercicny dom v Marianke funkcnym klastorom?
Aleks-Berlin (2019-01-22 08:14:44+00:00): Hi dintrans_g,
please write wikipedia="es:Abc..", see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:wikipedia#Ejemplos

Gracias from germany, Alex
Andrea Musuruane (2019-01-20 11:41:57+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta su OSM. I tre segmenti che hai inserito non hanno tag e probabilmente dovrebbero essere riuniti in un'unica way. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Map_Features Ciao, Andrea
mavl (2019-02-25 17:24:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Leo Slager (2019-01-22 11:20:03+00:00): Door het verkeerd opknippen van de rotonde bij Lexmond zijn alle routerelaties van de buslijnen beschadigd.
Heb zelf geen ervaring met Potlatch, maar heeft die soms last van het "dikke vinger syndroom". De knip wordt namelijk niet gelegd op de node waar de wegen samen komen, maar juist op de naastgelegen node.
Leo Slager (2019-01-22 11:21:05+00:00): Rotonde weer op de juiste manier opgeknipt en alle routerelaties zijn weer gerepareerd :-)
Leo Slager (2019-01-22 11:22:56+00:00): Hier zie je je wijziging.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66459089
nilodo (2019-02-16 16:06:25+00:00): Dank voor de reparatie, maar weet je zeker dat dat door mijn handelen komt? Ik heb **niet** geknipt, alleen bestaande segmenten van tag veranderd.
Ik zie dat er in dec 18 aan de rotonde gesleuteld is.
Niet om me er onderuit te kletsen, maar als je gelijk hebt, dan zou het in Vianen ook fout moeten zijn, daar voert deze weg bijna over het busstation ...

Hoor van je, F.
Leo Slager (2019-02-16 18:10:24+00:00): Ben eens dieper gaan graven in de historie van die rotonde. Op de een of andere raadselachtige manier ben je er in geslaagd om het kwart van de rotonde uit te breiden met een vierde segment.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66459089
Eerlijk gezegd heb ik geen flauw idee hoe dat in Potlatch mogelijk is, want het oorspronkelijke driekwart van de rotonde is er ook nog en dat overlapt dan waardoor alle routes verbroken waren.
Het lijkt er dus op dat we het raadsel niet op kunnen lossen.
eggie (2019-02-16 19:24:53+00:00): Het is volgens mij een "bug" in potlatch2 die af en toe optreedt. Soms heb je opeens twee losse eindjes als twee wegen elkaar tegenkomen op een eindnode en op rotondes zie ik wel meer eens een verdubbeling. 
Ook bij eigen edits. 
Eigenlijk best een goede reden om de validator van JOSM te gebruiken. 
Gr Eggie
nilodo (2019-02-16 20:05:30+00:00): Ja maar, ja maar, ik heb niet geplakt of gecombineerd. Slechts de highway teruggezet op secondary. Op 24 dec heeft Sint E7 drie van de 4 rotonde-segmenten [N,W en zuid] gecreeerd ...
Leo Slager (2019-02-16 22:38:49+00:00): Die changeset van Sint E7 laat geen fouten zien. Bovendien werden de routerelaties niet als beschadigd gemeld.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65750351
Gelet op de waarnemingen van Eggie moet de "schuld" dus bij de gebruikte software worden gelegd. Mijn eerste bericht was ook zeker niet bedoeld om een "schuldige" te vinden, maar ter leering ende vermaeck. 
Overigens kan ik je reactie begrijpen want zo voelde ik mij ook toen mij de eerste de beste dag werd verweten een multipolygoon beschadigd te hebben, terwijl ik daar niet eens in de buurt was geweest. :-)
gscholz (2019-01-23 05:28:03+00:00): Hola,
this changeset detroyed two boundary relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-75.98558&lat=-0.12544&zoom=10

I have allready fixed that but how can this happen? Don't you use JOSM?
Saludos
Guido
FreedSky (2019-02-08 13:07:00+00:00): 搞事
abakus_uploader (2019-01-19 23:30:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kuhni74 (2022-10-04 15:08:21+00:00): Kommt "alt_name=Klausgraben" für den Annagraben vom Klausgrabenviadukt bzw. den beiden Klausgrabentunneln, oder gibt es noch eine weitere Quelle dafür?
gebux (2022-10-04 17:08:47+00:00): Der Alt-Name kommt aus der Beschreibung in Rudi Gamsjägers
Canyoningführer von 2000.

Beschreibung Zustieg:
Den Wanderweg ln Richtunq Gösing qehen bis zum Annakreuz.
Dort links abzweigen auf den Klauskogel, Höhe 985 m und vom
höchsten Punkt sehr steil über felsdurchsetztes Waldgelände in den Klausgraben absteiqen
kuhni74 (2022-10-04 17:29:29+00:00): Vielen Dank! Handelt es sich um "Rudi Gamsjäger: 20 Canyoningtouren in der Ötschergruppe und im Gesäuse"? Im Internet kommt da irgendwie wenig. War das im Eigenverlag?
gebux (2022-10-05 11:43:46+00:00): Das war im Eigenverlag, Rudi Gamsjäger war ein Canyoningguide aus der Gegend.
kuhni74 (2022-10-05 13:25:37+00:00): merci!
Jakka (2019-01-19 18:18:54+00:00): op dit gebied staan daar woningen op ? landuse=residential https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251801726
mavl (2019-01-24 06:31:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66591396 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2478].
oseveno (2019-01-24 18:06:59+00:00): Verdwenen zonder opmerking?
flohoff (2019-01-21 11:49:01+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier die fläche zwischen Süd und Nördlichem Teil mal getrennt um die komplexiität der Fläche zu reduzieren. Und die Straße ist ja keine Weide.

Was du dir nochmal ansehen könntest ist das am See Wald und Wiese sich überlappen.

Das kann eigentlich nicht sein. Entweder das ist eine Viehweide (meadow) oder ein Wald (forest). Beides gleichzeitig kann das ja nicht sein.

Flo
pio2_122 (2019-01-19 18:38:56+00:00): Adres Niemierzyńska 31 nie istnieje. Został usunięty z SIP wraz z rozbiórką budynku.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-20 00:10:07+00:00): Hi!
The correct way to tag a tennis court is:
leisure: pitch
and
sport: tennis
Try to avoid using descriptive names on OSM :)
Hjart (2019-01-19 19:41:50+00:00): I have removed this. Recent (from last spring) SDFE aerial imagery shows bare fields and the quarry extending into the old runway (as seen on Bing imagery)
jan_olieslagers (2019-01-19 19:50:56+00:00): Thanks for information. However removing is not the right approach: we could go on and on, me adding it and you removing - no good. I will re-add, but with proper tags of disused and closed. This will also avoid the field showing up in the map - an important concern for some, though myself don't really care. 
Feel free to discuss further, perhaps directly at karlchen9@skynet.be.
Kind regards!
Karel
jan_olieslagers (2019-01-19 19:54:49+00:00): And if you will kindly excuse the "schoolteacher" style: next time please first discuss, before removing. Sincere thanks in advance!
Karel
Hjart (2019-01-19 21:37:56+00:00): You don't care whether a closed airstrip shows on the map or not? That makes me suspect you're not really a serious mapper.
Note that I also prefer to keep discussions like these in the open.
jan_olieslagers (2019-01-19 22:00:31+00:00): Thank you sincerely for discussing openly, and for voicing your suspicion.

There is even some truth to it: I am not primarily concerned about the presentation of the map; my first concern is to have a correct, complete, and historically sound database of geographical information - aerodrome information more specifically. Allow me to remind you our edits do not directly affect the map! They affect the database, and from the database is constructed the map. But the database serves a multitude of other purposes, too - you might be surprised to see how many applications consult the database directly, to do all kinds of different things with it, often very specialised.

So while I agree we should not enter data into the database that makes the map incorrect, we do should take care to first and above all have a correct and complete database. Compromise may help a lot! In this particular case, using the disused: tags seemed a fair compromise to me, because on the one hand they keep the relevant information in the database, on the other hand they do not show up on the map with the present rendering mechanism.

The key phrase in all this discussion is "do not map for the renderer": we should not base our edits on their effects in the published map. By the way, there is much annoyance among mappers of aeronautical information (there are but a few across Europe, I have been in touch with several, over the years) that the renderer only has one way of displaying aerodromes, which means it will apply the same presentation to a busy international airport as to a rural recreational aerodrome. There has been some effort to get several levels of aerodrome to be recognised and handled by the renderer, but with no success so far.

I hope I have convinced you of my seriousness :) and remain very much available for further discussion!

Kindly yours,
Karel ADAMS
Haacht, Belgium.
atcomapper (2019-01-20 05:25:16+00:00): OSM is not a historical map. If you wish to create a map of historic airfield (which is absolutely interesting; I am an aviator myself) - OSM is NOT the place to do it. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features
eggie (2019-01-19 20:14:36+00:00): Dag Martin,

Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Ik zie dat onze routespecialist DvdHoven de fietsroute en knooppunt 19 weer heeft hersteld.
Probeer je aantal veranderingen klein te houden in één upload. Met editor iD kun je eigenlijk niet iets veranderen aan fietsroutes.
Ook vlakken die zichzelf doorsnijden (selfintersecting ways) rendert niet goed meer. Je kunt dat goed zien in achavi dat lijnen zichzelf weer tegenkomen.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66460498
Alles ligt weer recht nu.
MVG,
Eggie
Jakka (2019-01-20 07:44:59+00:00): deze meadow lag al binnen een gebied meadow.... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664689719
Jakka (2019-01-20 07:47:54+00:00): Zijn één of meerdere huizen ? We tekenen best exact individuele grond contact vormen. Zo moet er later niets aangepast worden.
sergeybe (2019-01-19 19:05:15+00:00): Сам пил несколько раз без кипячения и последствий. Знаю больше двух десятков людей, которые пили и не отравились. Данные изменения подтверждают, что вода чистая: http://rodnik-crimea.ru/Tds.html
В начале июня вода примерно 7-8 градусов, это говорит о том что вода не из поверхностных слоев.
kräckel (2019-12-14 20:26:58+00:00): Hi Rene,
relation 9235582 https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?relation=9235582#map=18/49.66248/6.22126 - from to roundtrip 
?
Happy mapping bye Kräckel
Supaplex (2019-01-20 02:25:06+00:00): 加個維基百科的連結吧，別只有維基數據
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66461281
Supaplex (2019-01-20 02:32:27+00:00): 而且，其實加了維基百科連結，就會自動加上維基數據的ID
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66461281
sergeybe (2019-01-19 19:17:32+00:00): Вода питевая. Сам не пил, но во многих отчетах читал что чистая:
http://neizv.crimea.ua/Rodnik1/Ak_chokar.html
johantiden (2020-05-12 08:09:11+00:00): Some ways are "closed forever". Shouldn't we delete them or re-tag as abandoned or similar?
DaveF (2019-02-09 17:36:45+00:00): Hi
This is purely a subway line so should be railway=subway. 'tunnel' & 'layer' are the tags used to define whether it's subterranean.
The adjoining lines are shared so should have railway=rail & subway=yes. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dsubway

Could you change them back please?
DaveF (2019-02-09 17:44:15+00:00): If OSMAnd fails to render it adequately then please contact them to ask to amend their render rules.

Cheers
DaveF
Hjart (2019-01-19 21:41:26+00:00): Note that the airstrip is not just "disused". It's completely gone. Like in nothing left.
jan_olieslagers (2019-01-19 21:59:08+00:00): Hm, that is confusing. In a previous message you stated the runway was slowly being taken over by overgrowth and by the quarry - which sounded quite realistic. Now you tell me there's nothing left of it? That is quite a different thing.

If there is really nothing left, I think the historical:aeroway=runway and historical:aeroway=aerodrome would be most appropriate. there is an article somewhere in the OSM wiki about "life-cycle management" which points all of this out - but honestly, I have found few people attach so much importance to such minor differences. There is however nothing wrong with perfectionism! :)

Karel
Hjart (2019-01-19 22:21:01+00:00): I did state that this was "bare" (probably a "danism" though) fields. What I meant to say is that this is now farmland with no trace left of any airstrip.
Open iD (which will automatically select the most recent imagery for the area) here and you'll see what I mean.
jan_olieslagers (2019-01-19 22:33:56+00:00): OK, very well, and I can understand the "danism" aspect. I stand by my suggestion to tag then with "historical:aeroway" , and be assured of my support and sympathy. Meanwhile, someone saw fit to tag with "removed:" which seems to me utter nonsense :(
Regards,
Karel
Hjart (2019-01-19 23:18:04+00:00): "removed" makes good sense to me. The airstrip obviously was removed.
If you can marking it "removed", or anything to that effect, in your sources would make good sense too.
atcomapper (2019-01-20 05:22:25+00:00): For the sake of keeping the discussion in one place, I will quote what I replied to jan_olieslagers in a private message:

"Because “Former Airstrip at Bodilster” is NOT the name of this place, just like “Closed Netto” is not the name of a building that used to house a Netto store. Unless there is a signpost on site, or locals commonly use a specific name, then an area simply has no name, and none should be defined. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_describe_things_using_name_tag

The disused prefix is used for objects “that are in a reasonable state of repair but which are currently unused” (quote from the wiki). Since the runway has been physically removed, saying that it is in a reasonable state of repair is wrong. The removed prefix is commonly used in Denmark for objects that have been permanently removed. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:

Besides, OSM is not a place to map historical features. Only current features that exist and can be verified if you go (physically) to the place in question should be mapped. The only reason to keep the runway in the database (with the removed tag) is to prevent someone from adding it again by mistake as long as it is still visible in some aerial imagery (although, if you use updated imagery of Denmark, it is already gone). When aerial imagery is updated, the runway should be removed completely. Again, OSM is a map of current features, not a historical map. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features"
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-07 01:20:16+00:00): I just want to say, thank you for adding the website.

While it may not exist anymore, it certainly kept my search history clean. haha.
nereocystis (2025-03-07 03:37:16+00:00): Oh no!
Thanks for the comment
SimonPoole (2019-01-19 21:21:32+00:00): Proper comment should have been source: Gebäudeadressen des Kantons Bern © Amt für Geoinformation des Kantons Bern; description: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canton_of_Bern_Address_Import; comment: edited city, edited street

Source is the above mentioned cantonal data and ESRI clarity.
tux67 (2019-05-13 15:03:59+00:00): Die links zum Denkmal waren kaputt ...
Harald Hartmann (2019-01-26 11:34:48+00:00): reverted:
1. automated edit ohne vorherige Diskussion/Ankündigung
2. Biberau mittlerweile obsolet
3. dieses addr:suburb, da sag ich mal nix zu.
PS: und ach ja, wenn du schon osm-suspects genutzt hast, wieso hast du dann Tellerhammer bei dieser Aktion vergessen
Harald Hartmann (2019-01-26 11:42:37+00:00): reverted:
1. mechanical/automated edit ohne Ankündigung/Diskussion
2. Biberau ist obsolet
3. addr:suburb ... da sag ich jetzt mal nichts zu

PS: und wenn man schon osm-suspects nutzt, wieso vergisst man dann den Ort Tellerhammer?!
BeKri (2019-01-26 14:25:48+00:00): Servus Harald,
Danke für's nachfragen VOR dem revert, gehört eigentlich auch zum guten Ton, aber ich vergass,
dass ich da "in DEIN Revier" pinkel.
zu 1: sehe ich nicht so.
zu 2: schön das DU es dann ins korrekte
"Schleusegrund" geändert hast ...
ach hast Du nicht ? warum ?
zu 3: statt nicht zu sagen einen besseren Vorschlag machen ?
zu PS: ich erhebe keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit, bin aber sicher, das Du das korregieren wirst.

Mit Bezug auf Deinen Kommentar bei FahRadler: Keine Ahnung, wie DU auf die Idee kommst, andere Tools als "irgendwelche angeblichen "Fehlerlisten" " abzutun, Tatsache scheint zu sein, das es in der Gemeinde Schleusegrund viele viele OrtsTEILE gibt.
Wo gehört ein OrtsTEIL hin ?
Mit Grüssen und nicht vor Ort derBeKri
Harald Hartmann (2019-01-26 15:31:59+00:00): Es mag die Gemeine Schleusegrund wohl administrativ geben und in ihr administrativ in der Tat wohl Ortsteile ... aber addr:* richtet sich zumindest in Deutschland nach dem Karlsruher Schema und nach diesem bzw. allgemeiner Auffassung werden dort "postalische" Adressen erfasst. Schleusegrund wirst du aber postalisch nicht finden - klar du wirst recherchieren und mir Gegenhalten, dass die von dir und auch schon anderen geänderten Ortsteile durchaus noch unter Biberau zu finden sind ... aber Biberau findet nicht mal mehr im allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch Anwendung, also habe ich mich dazu entschlossen einfach nur die normalen Ortsnamen zu verwenden.
PS: Nur zur Info: mit der Benutzung von osm-suspects hast du den Hinweis bestätigt:
"
Diese Website analysiert den OSM-Datenbestand auf MÖGLICHE (!) Adress-Fehler. Das heisst NICHT, dass es sich um TATSÄCHLICHE Fehler handelt.

Jeder sollte sich im Klaren darüber sein, dass Änderungen ausschliesslich nach genauer Prüfung vorzunehmen sind.

Wenn der Sachverhalt nicht zu 100% klar ist, ist auf Änderungen zu verzichten und lieber einmal mehr wie zuwenig im Forum oder einer Mailingliste nachfragen.

Bitte respektiert die Arbeit anderer Leute, man kann immer in den Changeset-Kommentaren nachfragen, warum die Adresse so und nicht anders getaggt ist.
"

PS: Deshalb finde ich schon ein bisschen anmaßend dann einfach her zu gehen und einfach mal hunderte Objekte im Stil eines automated/mechanical edits, und search&replace ist nichts anderes, zu ändern.
Akkurator (2019-01-23 00:57:02+00:00): Danke, dass du deinen Edit von vor 10 Monaten korrigiert hast :-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57955113
opendcc (2019-01-22 13:19:19+00:00): Hello,

there is guest house in Moosburg, Burgermühlstr. 33; what is the source and purpose of this edit, please explain. Thank you.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-19 23:47:51+00:00): Please only add real businesses and parks to OSM, further you have added several nodes and areas that are not parks - Such as "Christmas Tree Farm"
Please review the OSM wiki carefully before making further changes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
SomeoneElse (2020-02-09 20:34:35+00:00): Hello Danicgx,
Can you explain why you deleted so many houses in this changeset?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-09 20:34:39+00:00): Hola danicgx
¿Puede explicar por qué eliminó tantas casas en este conjunto de cambios?
Atentamente,
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de trabajo de datos de OSM.
This Is A Display Name Desu (2019-01-20 01:46:08+00:00): 明明巴士公司通告話962C東行會改行中環灣仔繞道，點解要改劃成用龍和道轉添華道出？
This Is A Display Name Desu (2019-01-20 01:51:35+00:00): 而且機場巴士A12去咗元朗係乜事？