piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2020-02-23 23:32:42+00:00): I see. I think that may have been a JOSM thing. I don't recall making the relationship for those roofs. I did change some of the tagging on the bus stop to be a bit more accurate but I agree it's not quite up to snuff. I've been meaning to ground survey the area and make it a bit more kosher. I have learned a bit more about relations since and I'm practicing on some simpler stuff like parking lots/parking spaces. If I get  to this before you do, I'll make sure to do it properly.
Adamant1 (2020-02-23 23:43:18+00:00): No worries. It happens. I dealt with the stuff at the bus terminal at least.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-02 13:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 81679210, 81682323 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more political edits between Armenia and Azerbaijan .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3528 for more information
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-22 15:58:31+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81348835
hannaklimovich (2020-02-25 05:59:29+00:00): Hey ProjetoJosm! Better way to map roads is adding new features and tag it as highway=track because there are roads for mostly agricultural uses (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway). Please do not add tag highway for landuse borders, such roads do not connect with each other. Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81236921
GerdP (2022-07-06 13:22:20+00:00): Moin!
Ich bin sehr damit einverstanden, die Adressen auf addr:place umzustellen, aber warum hast Du das nicht für alle gemacht? Im Moment finde ich noch 13 Objekte (im Norden) mit addr:street=Bauerschaft Düngstrup. Wenn ich die auch auf addr:place umstelle, dann bekomme ich für die Nummern 24 und 25 doppelte Adressen. Weisst Du zufällig, welche da nicht zu Düngstrup gehören? Beide sind recht weit weg vom
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-22 16:00:38+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81348869
Polarbear (2020-02-20 02:23:44+00:00): How would you know from the source you gave that the area w774742894 is used for logistics?
Further, you just drew the landuse over an existing one. How did you judge that "industrial" was not correct?
Polarbear (2020-02-20 02:10:35+00:00): Why did you delete the two buildings w117339913 and w117339885 ?
They are visible in Bing, Maxar, ESRI currently, and in the local governmental imagery "ACTmapi June 2019". 
 
How do you use "Japan ortho" in Australia?

(buildings restored)
eggie (2020-02-19 22:21:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
trigpoint (2020-02-19 23:39:09+00:00): Should the landuse have changed here, also the road does not connect.

Cheers Phil
dzidek23 (2020-02-20 19:15:33+00:00): Hi, I have tried to use the Vespucci editor and it is a bit of a pain. I'll correct this once I'm back home. Need to get the name of this street as well.
user_5359 (2020-02-20 05:03:13+00:00): Please understand and follow: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
user_5359 (2020-02-20 05:03:19+00:00): Please understand and follow: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
pesec (2020-02-20 04:36:39+00:00): Кому и зачем нужна эта информация с заборами?
eggie (2020-02-19 22:25:09+00:00): Dag GhR  Wellicht de regel amenity = school weghalen. De naam zou dan op het gebouw kunnen als deze nog in gebruik is.
MVG,
Eggie
_GhR_ (2020-02-20 15:33:25+00:00): N.a.v. je suggestie heb ik de naam en een notitie aan het gebouw gekoppeld en 
de node 'school' verwijderd.
eggie (2020-02-20 16:16:13+00:00): Prima... Ik heb building=house specifiek toegevoegd omdat het nu een woonbestemming heeft. 
MVG,
Eggie
BCNorwich (2020-02-19 20:20:33+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You added number 18 to the whole terrace block which can't be right as there are about 15 houses there. So I've removed the number. If you can accurately pinpoint the position you could place a POI there with the single house data. Or better still map all the houses in the terrace. Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
Polarbear (2020-02-20 00:57:07+00:00): Klaus, how did you gain the knowledge that the spillway w697254178+w697254170 etc is not intermittent, so you removed that tag?
Waterway=spillway is marked as deprecated in the wiki; thus you created a regression from the better values. 
By what measurements did you change the stream into a river, and whet is the source of the name you added?
Polarbear (2020-02-20 01:08:14+00:00): The potential name of the stream and the character of the industrial landuses can be found in Google maps, did you copy them from there?
Polarbear (2020-02-20 01:22:17+00:00): Why did you remove the forest tag from the Shawnee State Forest? Looks very much like woods to me.
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-20 03:20:02+00:00): reverted in #81247616 with the reason:
US: revert cs 81238459, too many mistakes, undeclared sources, tagging regression
Klaus Schwer (2020-02-20 05:21:35+00:00): The name is from USGS:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/60795244/74896413-7fa4e680-5394-11ea-9514-b11ffa454ac0.png
Polarbear (2020-02-20 11:48:11+00:00): Your image shows a snippet of an unnamed map, for which the copyright situation is unclear. You must not copy from other maps, unless there is specific permission to do so.
phidauex (2020-02-20 17:36:08+00:00): Hi Polarbear, you may not be familiar with US map sources, but the snippet is clearly a USGS quad topo, which is released in the public domain by the US government and is fully license compatible with OSM.

Of course that doesn't address the other tagging changes - sounds like some cleanup is needed for tag consistency.
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-20 21:16:14+00:00): Thanks phidauex, you're right with the PD status. The problem here was that the map was not mentioned in the changeset's source tag and presented retrospectively in the form of a snippet, uploaded to github without attribution. 
As USGS has plentiful products, specifically naming the "USGS Topo(graphic Map)" would have been helpful as well.
Polarbear (2020-02-20 02:42:25+00:00): w554107835: "landcover=grassland" ergibt keinen Sinn, da Land nicht durch Land bedeckt ist. 
landuse=grass, landcover=grass, oder auch beides...
gefixt.
Klaus Schwer (2020-02-20 05:30:25+00:00): Sorry, war ein Fehler.
trigpoint (2020-02-19 23:27:52+00:00): Hi, thank you for the addition, however I am wondering why have you added the Wash Stones as residential road?

Cheers Phil
maraf24 (2020-02-24 13:55:17+00:00): operator, brand i network to nie są synonimy.
maro21 (2020-02-25 00:22:27+00:00): nie napisałem, że to synonimy
maraf24 (2020-02-25 09:50:09+00:00): Jednak usuwałeś brand.
Przy niektórych bankomatach operator różni się od brandu.
maro21 (2020-02-26 01:22:25+00:00): Ujednoliciłem tagowanie bankomatów we Wrocławiu.
Polarbear (2020-02-20 00:35:24+00:00): Klaus, 
bitte lösche keine Objekte, um sie leicht verändert neu zu zeichnen (hier: w45131677 -> w774756713). JOSM bietet dir viele Werkzeuge, um Objekte zu verfeinern. 
Die Geschichte der Datenobjekte ist für Qualitätskontrolle und Nachvollziehbarkeit wichtig. 
Warum hast du die 3 Gebäude gelöscht, ich kann sie sowohl in Bing als auch Maxar noch sehen?
Was bedeutet "Vale Europe"? Benutzt du andere Quellen als die angegebenen?
gfdklgdldsfgkgfd (2020-11-30 13:47:54+00:00): Sacré boulot !
eggie (2020-02-19 22:29:35+00:00): Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Heb je rekening gehouden met de fietsroutes . Die zullel nu zijn onderbroken.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81239920#map=18/51.50648/4.27974&layers=C
De hoofdrijbaan staat op slt met access=no Dat zal vast niet kloppen. Ook zie ik hier opeens dubbele banen? 
Ik kijk even verder.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-02-19 22:40:22+00:00):  reverted door Wijzigingenset #81241886
eggie (2020-02-19 23:01:03+00:00): Marcel.. kijk altijd even op de fietskaartlayer of er fietsroutes lopen. In zo'n geval eerst even hulp vragen op het forum. 
Zo kennen we ook wandel- en OV routes. 

De situatie even doorgespeeld aan DvdHoven.  ..  Zal even afwachten.. anders pas ik het zelf wel aan.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-19 23:32:42+00:00): Marcel.. Op de BGT zie ik een middenberm. Waaruit bestaat die? Kun je daar gewoon overheen rijden?
eggie (2020-02-20 08:31:59+00:00): De fietsroute is verlegd naar de hoofdrijbaan vanaf de Randweg  tot de Zoombaan door onze route-expert DvdHoven.
De fietspaden die er na de revert weer weren heb ik net verwijderd. In het noordelijke stuk heb ik ze omgezet naar footway (Kan ook worden opgenomen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan) en in het zuidelijke stuk zijn de parallelfietspaden opgenomen in de hoofdrijbaan met cycleway=track  anders zou de fietsroute losliggen van de fietspaden. Op fietskaarten zie je dan wel een parallelfietspaden lopen. 
Verder op het noordelijk deel cyclestreet=yes toegevoegd. 
Alles routeert in ieder geval weer.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-20 13:25:00+00:00): Begreep uit andere bronnen o.a. Fietsersbond dat het zuidelijk deel ook fietsstraat wordt.. Die tagging  cyclestreet yes maar gelijk meegenomen en cycleway=track (parallelfietspaden verwijderd)
Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-02-19 22:31:25+00:00): Een fietsstraat is gewoon open voor autoverkeer en dan tag je gewoon cyclestreet =yes  op de hoofdrijbaan.
Een cyclestreet zal niet nog eens fietsstroken hebben. 
Ik kijk even verder..
eggie (2020-02-19 22:41:08+00:00): reverted door  Wijzigingenset #81241865
eggie (2020-02-19 22:48:55+00:00): De twee changesets waar je met de beste bedoelingen de fietsstraat hebt proberen in te tekeken heb ik teruggedraaid. Dit is geen beginnerswerk. Dit routeerde allemaal niet meer. Er liepen ook via de voormalige fietspaden knooppuntroutes 12 -79
Die kun je niet zomaar onderbreken.
Ook stond de weg op slot voor iedereen met access=no.. Dat kun je vergelijken met verboden toegang. 
Eerst zul je dus een plan moeten maken hoe je de fietsroutes gaat omleiden. Geen beginnerswerk. 
Die fietsroute moet dan een andere role krijgen. Best ingewikkeld stuk zo.
Ook met een simpele editor als iD kun je geen fietsroutes verleggen. Waarschijnlijk heb je ze niet eens gezien.
Die routerelaties zijn essentieel voor een goede routering.
Even zo laten... dan kijk ik hier later wel naar of laat het aan de fietsrouteexperts over.
Vraag ook van te voren hulp op het forum of aan dick van den Hoven die over de fietsroutes gaat.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. 
Zo ben ik benieuwd of hier echt gescheiden rijbanen liggen met een middenberm?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-19 22:57:47+00:00): Ik heb de nieuwe situatie even doorgespeeld aan de fietsroute-expert.
Even niet zelf aan beginnen. De routes "moeten" intact blijven en het moet natuurlijk wel gewoon blijven routeren. 
Gr eggie
zstadler (2020-02-22 18:31:41+00:00): Another case of duplicate node in way :-(

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.78084&lat=33.12604&zoom=18&overlays=duplicate_node_in_way
hatul (2020-02-22 21:37:48+00:00): fixed
Leo Slager (2020-02-19 23:08:31+00:00): Dag CaptainWaifu,
Je vraagt om een review:
In NL worden de gebouwen en adressen rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. Beter dus om gebouwen niet zelf van vorm te veranderen.
Voor de import van een gebouw kun je een verzoek doen in het forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=777913#p777913
dat geldt dus voor de nieuwe gebouwen mar ook voor de Emma school !
eggie (2020-02-19 22:33:29+00:00): Een sportclub voeg je toe als
club=sport
sport=korfball
Vaak worden sportclubs ook wel als leisure=sports_centre getagd. Daar rendert dan wel de naam.
eggie (2020-02-19 23:05:43+00:00): Er is hier al een leisure=sports_centre dus club = sport enz. toevoegen.
eggie (2020-02-19 22:34:29+00:00): Bij een school tag je de regel
amenity=school. dan zal ook de naam renderen.
Gr eggie
maraf24 (2020-02-27 17:26:55+00:00): To jest Planet Cash, ale on jest obrandowany jako bankomat BPS. Trzeba stanąć tuż przed  nim, by odczytać faktycznego operatora.
maro21 (2020-02-27 23:02:34+00:00): Tak, wiem, widziałem te bankomaty. Ich zarządcą jest Planet Cash, ale właścicielem BPS. Gdzie to wpisać, do brand= czy owner=? I też nie wiem czy to ma być "BPS", "Grupa BPS", czy jeszcze inaczej.
maraf24 (2020-02-29 14:05:04+00:00): Pasuje brand lub network, sądzę że BPS jako nazwa wystarczy.
NIe pamięam, by te sprawy dyskutowano na forum, może warto by było się zapytać?
maro21 (2020-03-01 23:16:46+00:00): Dałem jako brand=.
Syl (2020-08-17 19:53:16+00:00): Bonjour, je ne comprends pas la correction qui a été apportée à ce chemin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773806624/
dpolovinkin (2023-08-16 18:11:28+00:00): hi! really wondering, why addresses are standing on the street instead of buildings? kinda strange
E de Wit (2020-02-20 17:52:59+00:00): Dag mtb-er,

Met deze edit heb je per ongeluk twee gebouwen verschoven en het adres van van der Schaaf er dubbel in gezet.

Ik zal de boel wel eventjes wijzigen, dan is een revert ook niet nodig.

-E de Wit
mtb-er (2020-02-20 18:37:38+00:00): Hallo E de Wit,

Dat was zeker niet de bedoeling. Ik heb dit met een mobile app gedaan en ging eigenlijk best wel moeilijk (slechte reactie app) in tegensteleling tot de PC programmas. Dus dat doe ik maar niet weer.
Dank voor de reactie.

Groet,
Ronald
Adam Franco (2020-03-09 13:56:06+00:00): Hi Cody, thanks for contributing to OSM! Please note that areas (such as parking areas) are not routable,  so when the paths are disconnected from the service road, hiking/biking directions will try to rout around this area and won't be able to connect through.

To fix this, extend the service road all the way through the parking area so that it connects to the paths at the trailhead node. Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/43.84997/-73.05758

An alternate way to achieve this if the trailhead is a little back from the parking area would be to extend the service road through most of the parking area, then add a little stub of path connecting the trailhead to the service road in the parking area.

Happy mapping!
Adam
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81241983
Cody Williams (2020-03-09 18:57:10+00:00): Thanks for the heads up, I'll connect the service road and trailhead through the parking. I was unaware routing did not consider areas with multiple connected paths as "routable".
phidauex (2020-03-09 20:41:08+00:00): Thanks for updating - routers may someday allow for routing across an area, but there are subtle challenges that have kept it from being supported so far. Parking lots and pedestrian plazas and outdoor malls are the most common case where routing across an area could be useful.
Adam Franco (2020-03-09 20:42:40+00:00): Looks good now. :-) While there may be some routing applications that can navigate over areas, connecting linear highway=* ways ensures the best compatibility.
StephaneP (2022-10-03 15:38:03+00:00): Salut !
J'ai supprimé une partie des voies de services que tu avais créées sur l'A71 pour les zones de stationnement près des téléphones d'urgence. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126944302

Ca ne pouvait pas être une voie séparée puisqu'il n'y a pas de séparation physique avec l'autoroute, et il y a un tag adapté à ce genre d'infrastructure : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Demergency_bay

J'imagine qu'il y en a d'autres à supprimer.

A+

Stf
chachafish (2020-03-08 16:58:20+00:00): Howdy. Welcome to OSM and thank you for your additions to openstreetmap. In this changeset it looks like you deleted the leisure=golf_course area and associated tags for the Littleton Golf Course. Did you mean to do this or perhaps you did accidentally? Thank you :)
H3GGERS (2020-03-08 17:06:23+00:00): Yeh, I did that purposefully but i'm fine if the change is reverted. I'm currently going through and updating all the golf courses in my area, primarily so that i can take the data in OSM into a course designer program and recreate the course. I noticed that if the course is splined around the bounds it tends to mess up the import and that its cleaner if the rough, fairways, bunkers and putting greens are all splined individually.
chachafish (2020-03-08 19:20:57+00:00): Okay, thanks. Yeah, it will need to be reverted in order to retrieve the leisure=golf_course areas and so that we can maintain the changeset histories. I appreciate the work you're doing, however. Just FYI, some of the edits you've created don't quite comply with the OSM wiki pages concerning golf courses. For example, holes don't normally have names. Take a look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole  Also, "Littleton - Hole 2 - Rough" wouldn't be a name. Littleton wouldn't be used in any event since the parts of the golf course will all exist within the confines of the leisure=golf_course area. "Rough" wouldn't be stated either since this is a description, not a name. "Hole 2" would not be a name, but a ref. The ref would simply be "2". I believe a good example of a correctly mapped golf course is in the link below - if you want to take a look. Have fun with the mapping :)  https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/39.78759/-105.04851
muralito (2020-02-20 01:52:43+00:00): Hola.

Lo que mapeaste son salidas de descansos al costado de una ruta, que es algo que no existe en Uruguay.

¿Que fue lo que quisiste mapear?
IgnacioCerisola (2020-02-20 02:12:48+00:00): Hola. Lo que quise agregar fue el Area protegida Playa Penino que es parte de los humedales del Santa Lucía. Creo que etiquete area de descanso porque no es estrictamente una playa, si bien también lo es. Es un excelente lugar para picnic. Pero si, tienes razón, no es lo que se conoce en el mundo como área de descanso.
user_5359 (2020-02-20 05:09:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
muralito (2020-02-20 01:43:38+00:00): Hola.

Te comento que lo importante que tenga nombre es el elemento amenity=school que es el que representa la escuela.

El building=school representa el edificio en si mismo, y solo le pondria nombre si es que lo tiene. Conozco pocas que nombren los edificios.
muralito (2020-02-20 01:44:41+00:00): Como ejemplo, si vos ves este mismo cambio detallado mas abajo, el simbolo de escuela aparace sin nombre.
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-28 21:29:24+00:00): This CS has been reverted in 81607692  with the comment:
DE: revert unreasonable removal of amenity tags in #81243225
ohiomapper (2020-02-20 09:12:09+00:00): Already on map, removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81262999
viloan (2020-02-20 00:25:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
woodpeck (2020-02-20 14:23:06+00:00): Addition of "man_made=works" named "PBM" is not sufficiently explained by "source=maxar, bing" (the name is not visible on imagery) - is this from local knowledge, or from another source?
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-20 21:27:06+00:00): In this case, Klaus had transferred the tags incl the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5777157026/history which was subsequently deleted. 
In such a case, I usually write in my CS comment "node->campus" or similar, and preserve the de-tagged node in a corner of the new outline for better editing transparency.
Supaplex (2020-02-20 05:18:56+00:00): 這位置在廣場裡，請問題在地下嗎?
74xin (2020-02-20 05:29:01+00:00): 我是用相對位置來判斷的，實際位置是在復興南路二段171巷底，遊樂場的左下方，屬於成功國宅37棟的1、2樓。廣場應該是在頂好超市下方區塊  行人天橋、噴水池那一區塊。以上提供參考。
Glassman (2020-02-20 17:25:31+00:00): Tip: square buildings by selecting the outline, then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81245469
Glassman (2020-02-20 17:27:19+00:00): I reviewed your edits. They all look great. Just remember to square buildings before uploading. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81245923
aaronsta (2020-04-20 06:14:21+00:00): Hi steerage250,
Thanks for your edit.
Please refrain from doing mistaken edits. If you do not know what you are doing please do not do it.
You changed the name on multiple occasions undoing the work of others, to replace it with a mistaken edit.
You changed the road name to "Darkin Kojonup Road" which is a clear misspelling. The town "Darkan" is nearby. You also provided survey & GPS as your data source. Most people are locals or attended the with an onground survey would not make such a obvious mistake. The correct spelling is "Darkan-Kojonup Road" (note the use of the dash). You also added the "surface=metal" tag which the road does not appear to be a metal bridge to me, or have a metal surface.

Traditionally these roads did not have names the roads were informally known as the Darkan Road or the Kojonup Road (for the same road) depending on which direction you travelled. When road naming was formalised the two were combined to make "Darkan-Kojonup Road". Subsequently this road was named as "Collie Changerup Road". 'Darkan-Kojonup Road" can be thought of as a placeholder name for when the road is unnamed. See this image:
https://images.es.landgate.wa.gov.au/mapsheets/M0252330IIINE.jpg

While there may be signs saying "Darkan-Kojonup Road", this is not the official road name. As it is signed you can add is as "alt_name=Darkan-Kojonup Road" (which I have done).

Cheers,
aaronsta (2020-04-20 06:24:15+00:00): Just to add to this the road name "Darkan-Kojonup Road" applies to multiple roads connecting through to Darkan, including some roads which have since been removed / closed. The reason for the name change is due to a change in road alignment.

In certain situations the tag "old_name=*" should be used (but this is not it).

"Darkan-Kojonup Road" is made up of the following Roads:
Collie Changerup Road,
Magini Road
Old Collie Road
Moodiarrup South Road
Darkan South Road
Darkan Road

Have a look on the map and you can see the old road alignment, for the newer section of Collie Changerup Road (north of Magini Road) it >never< had the name Darkan-Kojonup Road.