piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2016-08-28 13:54:14+00:00): Hi ridixcr,

thank you for fixing this multipolygon. :-)

You caused a conflict with my revert I am currently doing.

Instead of blindly (as blind and stupid as a bot) fixing "erros", I have a look at the object history before fixing an error. That's why I found this changesets, had a deeper look at them and decided to revert the whole bunch (an therefore reduce the number of errors).

See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39517002

Best regards

Michael
PlaneMad (2016-08-31 17:27:38+00:00): Hi Nakaner, could you please be more clear with what the issue is with the changeset? Was the multipolygon not fixed?
Nakaner (2016-08-31 18:26:57+00:00): Hi PlaneMad,

you fixed the multipoygon which was broken. That's the good thing. Thank you.

Unfortunately, you did not have a look at the history of this relation. That's a problem you share with your workmates. If you had took a look at it, you would have found that it is part of an broken import which uploaded large number of unclosed ways with natural=water (not even being part of a multipolygon). (I found this import when I tried out To-Fix https://twitter.com/Nakaner/status/769144181646295041)

If you look at the history before fixing something, you can easily distinguish an iD changeset which brake a multipolygon from an import uploading garbage. The first one needs to be fixed manually, the second one should be "repaired" by a revert.

Best regards

Michael
mikelmaron (2016-08-31 18:32:17+00:00): Whatever the situation on the map, whomever is in a conversation, saying things like "blind and stupid as a bot" is completely uncalled for. 

I have to assume, you wouldn't say something like that to someone's face. Take the same kind of basic courtesy from real life to interactions online. We are all still people here, working together on the map, and respect is paramount.
PlaneMad (2016-08-31 19:54:25+00:00): Michael, this was uploaded 3 months ago by an experienced Canadian mapper with a proper comment and source mentioned, and the data aligns with the imagery. 

If this is really a broken import, we should be working to create systems that can catch this much earlier on. If you could be more constructive in your approach, that will help focus on the real issues and try to find a solution together.
gormo (2016-08-26 09:02:22+00:00): Hi, wenn du die Waldwiesen nach Bing neu zeichnest (Danke, Danke!), dann setz doch auch das source-Tag an der Wiese um, auf Bing.
volker g (2016-08-26 10:29:14+00:00): Hi gormo, vielen Dank für den Hinweis, das hatte ich vergessen. Ich hoffe, dass ich alles richtig geändert habe.
Gruß volker
Supaplex (2016-08-25 18:19:44+00:00): 有店名嗎?
nammala (2016-08-26 04:04:47+00:00): Hi global system,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.May I know the reason behind deleting the farmlands which exists.

cheers,
krishna
global system (2016-08-26 11:12:28+00:00): Hello,
we are redoing this area, and was very poorly designed, will be remaking more correctly.
nammala (2016-08-26 12:44:01+00:00): Thanks

Happy mapping
user_5359 (2016-08-25 18:24:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! You forgot to add any information to your node.

If you need help: You are welcome!
RKPC (2016-08-25 18:31:41+00:00): Palladium Dr, Kennesaw, GA 30152 is not listed on any map!

Please add and update map
user_5359 (2016-08-25 19:23:11+00:00): Done. The update of the map needs some time.
user_5359 (2016-08-25 18:23:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
Alexander-II (2017-03-13 01:56:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы в этой правке создали мультиполигон, который не замкнут https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6529338 Исправьте, пожалуйста, или удалите, если он не нужен.
anderfo (2023-05-11 10:17:17+00:00): Hi,
I can see this road was tagged 6 years ago, but anyway: 
Is it correct that it is forbidden to cycle here (bicycle=no), or is this just a confusion between access tags and something else?
There is also a conflict between your tags access=no (no access for anyone) and foot=yes (access on foot). The foot=yes tag is usually implicit for paths/trails like these so you should only use it if there's reason to believe that it is forbidden to walk here.

In general, all these tags (access, bicycle, horse and foot) are only about access. The bicycle tag is not about e.g. how suitable a bike is on this trail. That is given by other tags like mtb:scale and class:bicycle:mtb :) 

I see that someone has removed the access=no and bicycle=no tags recently, but maybe you could have a look and see if you've used those on other paths as well.

Anders
Commodoortje (2016-08-26 07:53:59+00:00): Hoi Jos,

Per ongeluk heb je wat schade aangericht in OSM, wil je hulp hebben om dit te corrigeren, laat dit dan even weten.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263704014
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263704118
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
literan (2016-08-26 13:29:12+00:00): задвоил est-cafe, откатываю
literan (2016-08-26 13:29:04+00:00): задвоил, откатываю
user_5359 (2016-08-25 18:23:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight for better description
hafoe (2018-08-15 19:50:20+00:00): die Lage des Polygons Kollie/Goldhai ist falsch- viel zu groß -real Kollie nur knapp SO von Braunlage- Goldhai gibt es nicht sondern Goldbach
j-wills (2016-09-30 10:58:41+00:00): И как тут работается ?
EinKonstanzer (2016-08-25 20:01:54+00:00): Ist das noch Gelände der Bundeswehr? Das ist die Frage. Die Nutzung - oder nicht Nutzung ist etwas anderes. Also ev. nur ein military=disused hinzufügen.
Siehe auch: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dmilitary
Nanashi_de (2016-08-25 21:29:11+00:00): Die Wehrbereichsverwaltung hat das Gelände an die BImA, zwecks Konversion und Verkauf, abgetreten. Nachdem die Verkaufsbemühungen eingestellt wurden, ist das Gelände weiterhin im Besitz des Bundes und gehört nun zur BImA - Abteilung Bundesforst. Die Bundeswehr hat mit dem Gelände nichts mehr zu tun.
southglos (2016-08-25 20:51:56+00:00): This duplicates an existing school mapped as a relation (one polygon, two relations, one for each of the schools sharing this site); I'll copy across any new info (e.g. phone number) to the existing relation and delete this new object.
Rinaldum (2016-08-26 13:31:19+00:00): y a il vraiment un casino en pleine forêt ?
The RedBurn (2016-09-25 08:45:30+00:00): Ça m'étonnerait fort.
Voir aussi http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/678950 à propos de la 1ère modification de l'utilisateur.
RitterR (2016-08-28 17:04:02+00:00): Dodałeś drogę, która dopiero powstanie, a według twojej edycji jest już przejezdna.

Prośba na przyszłość o weryfikację wprowadzonych zmian, ponieważ działamy na żywej mapie.

Dodatkowe info gdzie widać, że droga nie idzie po linii prostej
http://wzdw.pl/wp-content/uploads/zamowienia/Dokumentacja%20projektowa_0.zip
RitterR (2016-08-28 17:05:15+00:00): Zastanawia mnie po co robią tą drogę, skoro wybudowano nową, wokół fabryki.
mapper999 (2016-08-25 20:47:27+00:00): Für die grauen Kästen gibt es übrigens inzwischen http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet
Nakaner (2016-08-25 20:58:47+00:00): Willst du damit sagen, dass man_made=telephone_exchange und communication=outdoor_dslam veraltet sind? Wenn man mit Vespucci mappt, dann hat man keine Lust, erst im Wiki nachzuschlagen. Da verwende ich die Tags, die ich auswendig kann und die in den Vespucci-Vorlagen (das sind dieselben wie JOSM) enthalten sind.

Die grauen Kästen, die mir dort gestern und heute begegnet sind, waren alles Kabelverzweiger und Outdoor-DSLAM der Telekom oder Kabelverteiler der Stadtwerke (sowie heute ein Schaltkasten einer Lichtsignalanlage).
Nakaner (2016-09-14 19:49:53+00:00): Ich habe jetzt, soweit möglich, man_made=street_cabinet noch ergänzt. Nur bei Kabelverzweigern der Telekom habe ich es nicht getan. Würde ich da man_made=street_cabinet + street_cabinet=telecom taggen, geht die Information verloren, dass es ein KVz und kein Outdoor-DSLAM ist. Deshalb lasse ich dort man_made=telephone_exchange stehen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42157629
Tchiller (2016-09-23 11:48:33+00:00): Those 3 new parking places are missing an access to some street. Thanks!
user_5359 (2017-10-08 17:33:57+00:00): Hello: Question to petco shop  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4366789563) Is the operator ref 218 or 280 (see https://stores.petco.com/ny/glencove/pet-supplies-glencove-ny-280.html)?
*Martin* (2016-11-21 19:45:26+00:00): "dakujem" ze si, slusne povedane, "rozdrbal" kopu turistickych a cyklistickych relacii. prosim prestan pouzivat editor iD ak fakt nevies ze co robis! Pokusim sa to revertnut ake uz tam vidim kopu konfliktov :-(. Prosim daj si tu namahu a nastuduj si nieco o relaciach a prestan bezhlavo spajat useky ciest. Dakujem.
dbf_ (2016-08-25 20:38:23+00:00): Пожалуйста, не используйте функцию "Добавить место" для своих личных заметок - эти изменения попадают на карту ко всем пользователям. Для этих целей используйте закладки: https://maps.me/ru/help#bookmarks
Спасибо!
dbf_ (2016-08-25 20:37:21+00:00): Пожалуйста, не используйте функцию "Добавить место" для своих личных заметок - эти изменения попадают на карту ко всем пользователям. Для этих целей используйте закладки: https://maps.me/ru/help#bookmarks
Спасибо!
Sprat98RUS (2016-08-25 20:18:30+00:00): gps error
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-08-26 07:15:01+00:00): Госснаб это название улицы?
если занимаетесь ремотом то можете добавить на точку shop=car_repair
а в description= поисание (В вашем случае моторист?).
robert (2016-08-25 20:49:56+00:00): If this is your home, I think you've misunderstood the purpose of OpenStreetMap. It's a globally editable, shared map. In the same way Wikipedia is a collaboratively edited encyclopedia. Not a place for personal waypoints.
user_5359 (2016-08-26 13:41:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building! Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
Carlos Brys (2016-08-26 19:44:12+00:00): No se debe incorporar información personal al mapa. 
El nodo será borrado
SomeoneElse (2016-10-15 15:16:08+00:00): I see that wsay22 is active again in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42918731 and others.  If you'd like any action from the DWG (a message, a block, whatever) just let us know by an email to data@osmfoundation.org .
Cheers,
Andy
Zartbitter (2016-10-16 19:03:29+00:00): Thanks for your information. But at the beginning this mapper was contacted by me, by others, got blocked... Every contact resulted in using another, newly created account and doing more bullshit. I'm counting about 15 old accounts. So I just watch this user and fix it when it is necessary.
DaveF (2018-08-03 00:43:04+00:00): Hi
I'm cleaning up 'C' class roads refs so they don't render. (discussed on Talk:gb)

A while ago you added ref= C114 which conflicted with the existing admin:ref tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120451345/history
 Are you able to double check to see which is correct? 
Ta
DaveF (2018-08-03 14:02:06+00:00): Doh! Replied to my own changeset.
mapper999 (2016-08-26 08:51:08+00:00): Eine Burschenschaft ist wohl keine rund um die Uhr geöffnete Touristenattraktion? Ich habe das Tagging angepasst, bitte nicht wundern, falls die Einrichtung in einigen Karten nicht mehr auftaucht.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-08-25 21:26:56+00:00): Co "istnieje"? Proszę dodawać sensowne opisy do zmian, w przeciwnym wypadku mogą zostać one wycofane.
Commodoortje (2016-08-26 07:18:33+00:00): Hi Marcin,

What does "haga :)" mean?
Alecs01 (2016-08-26 16:06:38+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, which kind of attraction it is?
highflyer74 (2016-08-31 10:16:57+00:00): Hello!

Can you help me with what maxditch=* is? Is this probably a typo? maxditch=* is not used anywhere in the world yet...

All the best,

highflyer74
Natsuyasumi (2016-09-01 05:22:41+00:00): Hi,
Od course it was a typo, it's supposed to be maxdraft=*. I just made a mistake in JOSM scheme. I'll try to fix it when i can.
highflyer74 (2016-09-02 18:41:17+00:00): Hello and thank you for your reply. I just came along and fixed it for you. Have a nice evening!
BCNorwich (2016-08-26 05:57:44+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The building you named is a group of sheds in back yards. I am pretty sure they are not named and in any case there is no need for name:en tag to be used. It's likely that this changeset would be reverted if you can't offer an explanation and verification. Regards
Derick Rethans (2016-08-26 09:18:08+00:00): BCNorwich, the Bing imagery could be outdated though. I have fixed the duplicate name/name:en : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oaOJSTbA4bAWGtaI4K4xyvcwQLndEYtumyAbi9H8ZAE/edit?usp=sharing
Edwin Hamelink (2016-08-25 23:01:15+00:00): Kan iemand me helpen?  Ik wil de adressen 2K t/m 2Z aanpassen in Rozenpark 22 t/m 42. Krijg het niet voor elkaar.
Commodoortje (2016-08-26 06:22:50+00:00): Edwin,

Allereerst welkom op OSM, natuurlijk willen we je helpen. 

Om het begrijpelijk te maken heb ik een topic op het OSM forum aangemaakt, waar stap voor stap je handelingen besproken worden en uitgelegd.
Je kunt aanhaken in dit forum door te registreren op dit forum. Dit kan door je OSM inloggegevens te gebruiken hiervoor.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Commodoortje (2016-08-26 07:07:13+00:00): Het hiervoor aangemaakte topic is 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=605796#p605796

Ik stel voor om je 3 changesets terug te draaien en stap voor stap met hulp weer op te bouwen.
Edwin Hamelink (2016-08-26 08:00:57+00:00): Ja, draai maar terug. Ik zal een nieuwe poging doen. Het is overigens geen nieuwe straat die ik heb aangelegd. Ik wilde de adressen van Rozenstraat 2k t/m 2z aanpassen in Rozenpark 22 t/m 40. Het is een beetje bizarre situatie. Ik woon dus daar in de straat. Gemeente heeft onze adressen al gewijzigd, terwijl er nog gesloopt moet gaan worden. Huurhuizen worden nog deels bewoond, tijdelijke verhuur. Vanaf volgend jaar gaan ze gefaseerd slopen en komt er nieuwbouw. dan krijgt ook de rest van het stuk straat tussen Kerkhoflaan en Geraniumstraat de nieuwe naam Rozenpark. Omdat de vindbaarheid van ons adres nu zo slecht is dacht ik zelf de kaart te kunnen aanpassen.
Commodoortje (2016-08-31 07:33:12+00:00): Ik heb een aantal correcties doorgevoerd, en heb niets teruggedraaid.
Wel heb ik de naam Rozenstraat omgezet naar Rozenpark thv 22t/m42.
.
De omschrijving van al je changesets hebben dezelfde tekst
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Edwin%20Hamelink/history#map=16/51.3317/3.8288
Wil je de changesets in de toekomst beter omschrijven? 
Mocht je vragen hebben kun je altijd contact opnemen.
nammala (2016-08-26 03:49:40+00:00): Hi Aseri,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your edits seems good but no need of multiple editions for the same building. I am going forward and reverting the changeset.
cheers, 
krishna
Carlos Brys (2016-08-26 03:01:21+00:00): Se borró la edición del usuario Paola81 por no ajustarse a la política de publicación de datos reales y verificables en el mapa.
Para este tipo de ediciones se recomienda usar http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
iWowik (2016-09-05 07:34:48+00:00): Ваши правки стоитло бы откатить.
Вы выдумали дробные угловые номера, а их нет в природе! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207361068

Там ровно два разных номера, а не один и не три! Не надо подгонять под схему associatedStreet то, для чего она не работает или вы не умеете сделать, чтобы правильно работала.




Исправте за собой
gpstracks (2016-08-26 04:59:41+00:00): Please review this changeset.

Way 439080949 is duplicated
(way 439080270)

Thank You
Igorzo (2016-09-01 21:19:22+00:00): now addressed the problem of when I created the path, I had to realize the tracking 2 times because the page is not loaded. As you can delete one track since they are identical?
Omegatherion (2016-09-03 06:23:42+00:00): Bitte verwende aussagekräftige CS-Kommentare!
Wenn du den Radweg seperat einzeichnest, müssen die entsprechenden Tags von der Fahrbahn entfernt werden.
zarl (2016-09-03 09:00:37+00:00): Bitte beachte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren für die grundsätzliche Entscheidung, wo ein Radweg separat eingetragen werden sollte. Wir mappen ja nicht für den Renderer, die Informationen sind in diesem Fall wohl besser als Teil der Fahrbahn einzutragen, also lösche den Radweg einfach wieder und ergänze im Zweifelsfall die Informationen am bestehenden highway. Das macht auch die Wartung für andere Mapper einfacher.

Hier findest du etliche Argumente, warum für uns alle gute Changeset-Kommentare wichtig sind: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Bitte stelle Qualität vor Quantität. Schlecht dokumentierte/erläuterte Änderungen werden eher revertiert.
smarties (2016-10-03 23:04:24+00:00): Mein lieber Omegatherion, das setzt dem Fass die Krone auf. Du hast mir meine Arbeit komplett gelöscht was Vandalismusm ist. Ich habe Dir etwa 20 E-Mails, Nachrichten usw. zukommen lassen von denen Du genau 8 beantwortet hast indem Du einfach nur ein und den selben Link ohne weitere Worte beantwortet hast. Alle anderen Nachrichten hast Du vollkommen ignoriert. Du stellst Behauptungen auf und wünscht Dir Dinge die in der Community so nicht beschlossen wurden. Also melde Dich auf die zahlreichen Nachrichten die ich Dir gesandt habe und beantworte meine Fragen. Smarties
Omegatherion (2016-10-04 07:49:50+00:00): beantwortet in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42417902
zarl (2016-10-04 07:50:12+00:00): Also wenn du "von der Community beschlossene Dinge" anerkennst und für wichtig betrachtest, solltest du dir Gedanken machen, ob sinnvolle Beschreibungen deiner Edits im Speichern-Dialog vielleicht Teil dieses Prinzips sind.
Siehe vielleicht doch mal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
nammala (2016-08-26 03:43:56+00:00): Hi Aseri,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your edits seems good but no need of multiple editions for the same building. I am going forward and reverting the changeset.

cheers,
krishna
5m4u9 (2016-08-26 06:22:19+00:00): gracias por editar y mejorarlo!

hay un contribuidor que lo movió y ya no pude seguirle los pasos...
Alecs01 (2016-08-27 09:35:33+00:00): Cambiato in shop=dairy, dovrebbe essere il tag che ha più senso
user_870861 (2016-08-28 13:54:39+00:00): hi,

- there is a lot of exactly duplicated ways between this changest ant this other http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41704675

- there is a lot of exactly duplicated ways in this changest. 

duplicated = the 2 ways had exactly the same geometry (not necessary the same nodes) AND both ways had exactly the same tags
scai (2016-08-28 16:06:32+00:00): Hi. Not sure what way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439086230 should represent but the coastline tag is definitely wrong (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline). I removed it.
user_870861 (2016-08-28 13:55:51+00:00): hi,

- there is a lot of exactly duplicated ways between this changest ant this other http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41704320

duplicated = the 2 ways had exactly the same geometry (not necessary the same nodes) AND both ways had exactly the same tags
user_870861 (2016-08-30 12:43:39+00:00): you can see issue 
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=2415&item=1230&class=1
scai (2016-08-29 15:46:39+00:00): Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439087191 had the tag natural=coastline which is wrong since this is no coastline. I removed it for you.

Also this way is a duplicated way since way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228440876 already exists. Please try to fix this.
scai (2016-08-29 15:48:48+00:00): There are even more ways with wrong natural=coastline tags. I will try to fix them all.
scai (2016-08-29 16:01:07+00:00): Or is this an undiscussed import? I better don't touch anything further.
mrsid (2016-08-30 08:56:26+00:00): Gidday, this import was using the LINZ2OSM tool.
This specific import is documented here:
http://linz2osm.openstreetmap.org.nz/workslices/create/layer_in_dataset/168/

Cheers friend!
scai (2016-08-30 09:15:29+00:00): In this case this tool is obviously broken since it creates wrong coastlines and duplicated ways. It should not be used any more until getting fixed.
user_5359 (2016-08-26 13:34:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you mean Bel Air, Los Angeles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bel_Air,_Los_Angeles) ? This isn’t a church and is mapped for more as a year (see http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150976696).

If there is an other meaning, please answer. If you willn’t answer, I will delete this entry.
user_5359 (2016-09-18 05:01:05+00:00): I have revert your changeset.
muralito (2016-08-27 02:36:02+00:00): Hola. ¿Que es Casa Roel?
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:19:12+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:18:41+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:18:28+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:18:13+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:17:46+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:00:53+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
pfg21 (2016-08-26 08:02:45+00:00): В адресе должно присутвовать наименование полностью совпадающее с именем улицы, т. е. улица Машиностроителей
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166119418
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:00:38+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:00:27+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:00:14+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:00:03+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 13:59:50+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2019-12-25 01:39:44+00:00): Hello im Riyadi from Hotosm. i working on mapwithai malaysia road mapping. i've come crossing in this area. i wonder why did you add building in the multi polygon? its make crossing warning multi polygon did you mind to explaining? 


thank you. happy mapping.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 13:59:36+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 13:59:00+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. They surely aren't post offices, but the address information may be useful.
user_5359 (2016-08-26 13:25:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A Bank withe the name House? Can you show we the website of this bank?
morryis (2016-08-26 06:33:02+00:00): Da scheint eine private Notiz zu sein, ich revertiere daher die Änderungen