piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
freebeer (2018-02-22 16:39:48+00:00): Ciao Constable,
Why did you bother to revert (incompletely) most or all of changeset 56560765, which basically I reworked to merge it and the pre-existing data to form a properly-shaped park area with decent footpaths?
This revert, which should have failed, instead has left a weird park outline, and the additional orphan nodes I added to refine the path outlines, neither of the originals matching the latest Mapbox images.
Sorry I only cleaned half of this user's awful edits before I crashed following my editing session, intending to attack the golf park and the like today.
Not that I'm complaining, it's just that https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56577878#map=19/37.59107/-120.95524&layers=ND looks pretty weird now.
grazie...
Constable (2018-02-22 17:22:25+00:00): damn, sorry for that, that was not on purpose, I didn't see you already cleaned up this mess.
Well, I could easily restore the park I guess, let me give it a try and I'll be back in some minutes.
Constable (2018-02-22 17:27:58+00:00): Your version of the park is back, thanks for your message!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:05:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
kartonage (2018-02-22 15:27:10+00:00): Hey erantr1, 

you haven't answered to my last comment and again have changed a few streets without giving a source. Some of these oneways don't seem right to me.

Without a source and given some of these changes combined with your usual mapping area I am lead to believe that some of these changes are based on imagery alone (or something else)? 

Hope you can give some clarification.
erantr1 (2018-02-22 16:31:20+00:00): Hey!
Sorry for not replying, but I did revert back my change in Marktstraße so now it's once again a single way.
As for the 1-ways changes I've made, they came from a field test.
All the best.
kartonage (2018-02-22 17:00:17+00:00): Alright, thanks! This helps me understand these changes. I was mainly curious after the Marktstraße change. :)
Cheers.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:14:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:47:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
GOwin (2018-02-24 11:37:24+00:00): Hi @SEASALT.

I recently noticed your contributions to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Thank you! Kudos for using OpenStreetMap's to create a better map of your community. 

With regard to this particular edit, the  "camp site" tag is not necessary since you already tagged this object as a beach resort. The convention in OSM is: one feature, one element.

If you want to add details, you will have to create the appropriate feature for each, and not just lump them as one.

If you have any questions at all, please feel free to get in touch. You might be doubtful about a particular tag, or would like to clarify their use. Or perhaps, you have ideas you want to flesh out  to improve your neighbourhood map. Or maybe  just want to know more about Openstreetmap.  

There's this concise tips page for Philippine contributors: https://telegra.ph/Awesome-OSM-Tips--Tricks-01-28

Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: https://telegra.ph/OpenStreetMap-LoCo-channels-in-the-Philippines-02-15

Welcome and best regards, in behalf of the OSM contributors' community
GOwin
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:26:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-22 13:22:35+00:00): Se ne sta parlando in ml. Purtroppo stanno aumentando i vandali. L'unica cosa da fare è commentare i loro changeset e segnalarli sia in ml che al DWG (Data Working Group).
Probabilmente è un utente di pokemon go che non si rende conto che viene utilizzato anche nei soccorsi OSM e vandalizzare la mappa significa mettere a rischio vite umane. Ora non ho un PC sotto mano, verificherò dalla cronologia chi ha vandalizzato la mappa.
TheMapper1987 (2018-02-22 14:07:15+00:00): Ti ringrazio per la risposta, purtroppo ho notato tantissime modifiche assurde (piazze intere diventati parchi ed edifici o strade diventati parchi) e le sto rimodificando una ad una. La prossima volta seguirò il tuo consiglio di segnalare l'utente.
Constable (2018-02-22 14:52:59+00:00): ciao, quasi sicuro questo è un problema legato a pokemon go, da quando il gioco usa la nostra mappa ci siamo riempiti di giocatori/vandali/cheater o bari, chiamali come vuoi, che aggiungono parchi e pozze d'acqua ovunque, perché lì è dove compaiono i pokemon.
Non stare a diventare pazzo, usa qualche strumento tipo https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/ per tenere sotto controllo le modifiche che avvengono nella tua zona, quando danni sono troppi tieni conto che esiste una mailing list dove si discute, anche di questo genere di problemi.
Registrati, partecipa, segui e se hai bisogno scrivi, trovi di sicuro qualcuno pronto a darti una mano.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Nel frattempo cerco di capire quale altro edificio è diventato parco e chi dobbiamo ringraziare.
Ciao!
Constable (2018-02-22 14:56:23+00:00): il soggetto problematico è https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mauro%20Lepore

Qua puoi vedere gli oggetti che ha modificato e che dopo il suo passaggio nessuno ha più toccato:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/wpz

Ci sono almeno due piazze diventate parchi.
TheMapper1987 (2018-02-22 14:57:11+00:00): Ciao a te! grazie mille per le informazioni! 
L'utente che ha modificato di tutto a Napoli è Mauro Lepore, ho tracciato tutte le sue modifiche e riportate alla normalità (edifici, zone pedonali, e così via)
Constable (2018-02-22 15:02:58+00:00): Ciao, ho visto grazie, per il lavoraccio.
Quando noti cose sospette cerca di entrare in contatto con il mappatore in questione, lascia un commento positivo ad una delle sue modifiche, guarda come risponde e a quel punto decidi come andare avanti. Non è quasi mai buona cosa aggredire, perché poi quelli che devono rincorrere per sistemare siamo noi che alla mappa ci teniamo davvero.
Gli ho scritto, vediamo se mai risponderà.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56041187
Se hai tempo, nei prossimi giorni passa dal suo profilo per vedere se continua a far danni.
Ciao!
Constable (2018-02-22 15:07:03+00:00): scusa se ne approfitto ma se sei della zona puoi controllare questo passaggio pedonale?
la geometria mi sembra a dir poco sballata
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240441285
Sembra comunque che sia colpa di una modifica di due anni fa, non del nostro amico https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=36882003
Se riesci correggi tu per favore
grazie
TheMapper1987 (2018-02-22 15:24:34+00:00): Ci penso io appena sono in zona. Non preoccuparti
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-22 17:15:07+00:00): Perfetto! Segui i consigli che ti ha già dato Constable. Per non impazzire ti consiglierei di fare il revert. Solo che non credo che sia possibile con id. Con JOSM c'è il plugin revert che reverta l'intero changeset.
TheMapper1987 (2018-02-23 11:52:31+00:00): Riguardo la geometria del passaggio pedonale: quello indicato dovrebbe rappresentare i sottopassaggi della linea metropolitana (Linea 1 e Linea 2) delle stazioni di "Museo" e "Piazza Cavour". In effetti non credo la geometria rispetti la realtà ma non so nemmeno come confermare la reale geometria (ho provato a cercare online una mappa della stazione e delle varie uscite con rispettivi sottopassi ma non ne ho trovate).
Christopher (2018-03-25 18:36:38+00:00): Hallo,
du hast den Way 9831835 von Kolumbastraße in Glockengasse umbenannt. War das absichtlich wg. Umbenennung durch die Stadt oder versehentlich? Denn die Häuser in der Straße haben noch ihre ursprünglich Adresse mit Kolumbastraße. Die Häuser hätten dann eine neue Nummer bekommen müssen, da diese Nummern schon an anderer Stelle vergeben sind.
Christopher
Raymond (2018-03-25 18:44:11+00:00): Hallo Christopher, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Da habe ich einen Fehler gemacht und soeben mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57515183#map=19/50.93866/6.95399&layers=N korrigiert. Auch das kleine Stück westliche Brückenstraße.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
PT-53 (2018-02-22 14:46:17+00:00): Hallo Gerold,
das sehe ich anderst (gem. Darstellung in Maps4BW und Geportal-BW).
2. Anfrage an Gemeinde ist bereits raus.
Grüße
PT-53 (2018-03-07 09:18:46+00:00): Antwort der Gemeinde Königseggwald:
>> Sehr geehrter Herr ,
der Straßennamen der Zufahrt zum Brühlhof heißt Brühlhof.
Der Marktplatz ist keine Straße sondern ein Platz. <<
Änderst  den Marktplatz wieder ?
Gerold (2018-03-07 16:02:46+00:00): erledigt
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
user_5359 (2018-02-25 09:03:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I am sorry, but a "very popular spot" isn't the definition of a park. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark. And I can't see any green area on the different aerial images. I assumed the natural=beach is a better description.
theperfectool (2018-02-25 10:20:59+00:00): It's a municipal park that encompasses a traffic circle( that has an informational placard and local wildlife sculpture), a parking lot, city restroom, city bike rack and the end of the spit pedestrian trail.  There are local native plants planted in the traffic circle as well as salt marsh between the parking lot and beach. It's hardly just "a very popular spot". The city of homer has it listed as "end of the road park". The above fits the wiki definition you suggested, please take another gander at it would you?
user_5359 (2018-02-28 08:18:43+00:00): I apologize for the late answer (because of illness). 
Quote beginning 
A park is an area of open space provided for recreational use, usually designed and in semi-natural state with grassy areas, trees and bushes. Parks are often but not always municipal.
End of Quote 
I see only a very small part of the leisure with this feature. But in the end, the local OSM mapper has to decide how this should be done.
theperfectool (2018-03-02 12:54:29+00:00):  How does one view leisure exactly? What part of free time DID you see there? - I'm unaware such a feat by looking at a map or don't understand your meaning. 
 If you'll pull up a map of the area at dawn and dusk you'll see all the park patrons that like to view one of the best sun rises/sets in the area. You're afforded top notch panoramas of kachemak bay right from your vehicle. 
 If you can look at aerial shots during any given warm summer day you'll find the park abuzz with fishermen, as it's the best beach fishing in the area. 
-It's a well known/well used park, but it's not on the open street map.
theperfectool (2018-03-02 12:56:34+00:00): All of this still fits your description/definition you quoted to the letter.
user_5359 (2018-03-02 13:40:14+00:00): But in the end, the local OSM mapper has to decide how this should be done.
theperfectool (2018-03-02 15:34:18+00:00): So you're just trolling me then? I don't think osm would appreciate that. I'm not going to respond further to this. -where's that report button?
user_5359 (2018-03-02 16:15:29+00:00): We have enough problems with Pokemon registrants. I stand by my opinion that none of the aerial photographs show a park. But I don't stick to my opinion, I accept your argumentation! You want to complain about that? 
By the way, you can make complaints at Data Working Group (not before you have read the whole text), which you can find in the Wiki.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
MiroJanosik (2018-03-13 09:45:48+00:00): Ahoj
 tie tagy si pridal nespravne, prosim skontroluj a oprav si to.
  Miro
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
abakus_uploader (2018-02-22 23:37:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Carlos Brys (2018-02-27 10:03:18+00:00): Modifiqué algunas de tus ediciones:
Quité el nombre y la clasificación de varios negocios y los pasé a un nodo (de preferencia, los datos no van el el edificio).
Los nombres de los negocios no llevan la descripción (farmacia, verdulería, etc)
Rectifiqué la cuadratura de los edificios.
No es aconsejable dibuhar los edificios unidos a las líneas de interpolación de la numeración de las casas.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].