piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
letihu (2019-11-05 19:50:45+00:00): Warum sind denn die Fußwege
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6504534095/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692827024/history#map=17/53.38056/11.58960&layers=N
an mehreren Stellen mit dem Wasser verbunden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6504534089/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6504534154/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6504534155/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6504534095/history
letihu (2019-11-05 20:06:57+00:00): Hier leider auch:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6504534109/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2415988915/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-27 18:37:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70671523 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-27 18:37:26+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 70671512.
Carnildo (2019-05-30 04:04:19+00:00): This edit appears to have left a gap in the Milk River when you deleted way 95334308.  Was this intentional?
kadircelik (2019-05-27 19:34:30+00:00): haha burayı tam ben de  düzeltiyordum ve yüklüyordum ki Josm conflict verdi :D benden önce davrandın
Chris Fleming (2019-05-27 21:49:51+00:00): Thanks for signing up and fixing this!

Please let me know if you have any questions.
frosm (2019-05-27 20:14:20+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
pour une bonne contribution, n'hésitez pas à décrire le pourquoi de la modif
décrire "première contribution", ca tout le monde peux le constater :)
par contre deviner si le bout de la côte effacé est une erreur ou pas, c'est utile :)
skquinn (2019-05-27 22:34:30+00:00): Please split this into multiple changesets for each region next time. There's no reason for the bounding box to include the entire continental US.
baptistemm (2019-05-28 06:23:18+00:00): Ok, dully noted.
gendy54 (2019-07-27 18:56:25+00:00): Salut Baptiste,
Je ne comprends pas la raison de ce changement massif de typographie. Les règles de typo sont claires: il ne doit pas y avoir de majuscule (cf Wikipedia entre autre).
gendy54 (2019-10-06 18:16:08+00:00): Salut Baptiste,
Tu m'as oublié? ;)
baptistemm (2019-10-08 05:57:00+00:00): Salut, oui j'avais oublié.

En fait j'avais regardé les différentes typographies et j'étais tombé sur avec et sans majuscule avec le même ratio si je me rappelle bien. Par soucis de cohérence, j'avais choisi d'uniformiser en prenant la forme avec majuscule sans savoir qu'il ne fallait pas de majuscule (peux-tu me fournir un lien vers cette règle).
lmagreault (2019-05-29 08:48:41+00:00): access=private pour le parking plutôt que access=no qui me paraît un peu sévère ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70673549
Howpper (2019-05-27 20:52:03+00:00): According to wiki, this is a valid access tag.
LeifRasmussen (2019-05-27 21:17:58+00:00): According to national standards, bicycles are *only* allowed on interstates in some few cases where using that interstate is the *only* way to get from one point to another without a huge detour (such as 100 miles).  Bikes (and mopeds, horses, etc.) are not allowed on most interstates.  
I think that bicycle=no might be better fit than bicycle=discouraged, but it doesn't matter too much.  Choose whatever you think is most appropriate.
LeifRasmussen (2019-05-27 21:20:33+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-motorized_access_on_freeways
Wikipedia states that in Washington, bicycles can use interstates wherever they are not specifically banned.
Carnildo (2019-05-28 21:11:27+00:00): There's a specific ban on bicycles on I-90 heading eastward from the Geiger junction near Airway Heights, but I don't know how far east it extends.
Frans S (2019-05-31 17:33:36+00:00): Hello Gianluca. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark Buildings should be tagged as  building=yes.  not as landuse=yes or landuse=house
In general.  I will change them
Best regards
aquarix (2019-05-27 23:16:45+00:00): Hello,
it would be nice if you could split your changesets into smaller regional changes. One change should not exceed one country. In this case it ranges over three continents and one ocean. Please remember that in the future. Thank you very much.
Regards aquarix
trial (2019-05-28 08:23:07+00:00): you're perfectly right. That's what I usually do. For me, normally one country is already too much.
eggie (2019-05-27 21:39:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Alle begin is moeilijk. Probeer geen wegen aan bv de residential van pannerden te plakken. 
No een tip. footway=sidewalk hoort niet op die voetpaden.
Trottoirs die parakllel langs wegen lopen worden niet apart gemapt, want ze routeren niet goed. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-27 22:03:00+00:00): De residential heb ik losgemaakt van de wegen en het trottoir van de Doornenburgseweg verwijderd. 
paden die je aan de landuse hebt geplakt heb ik losgemaakt.
Eigenlijk zal je van je paden de tag footway=sidewalk nog moeten verwijderen.
Dit waren je edits.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70675267
skquinn (2019-05-29 11:41:24+00:00): Eek. No idea why the bounding box on this one is so damn big.
freebeer (2019-05-29 12:20:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132157675 v22

you touched it.
(and the others)
mariotomo (2020-09-27 15:32:41+00:00): hola.  ojalá todavía tengas interés en el mapeo del país.  te invito a comunicarte con el resto de la comunidad, pues sí hay una comunidad panameña de maperos!
Константин Гам (2019-05-27 23:38:05+00:00): Делая свои уточнения пожалуйста не пренебрегайте правилами осм.
NINO = name is name only
TOG = truth on the ground

Больше информации для новичков проекта вы найдете здесь:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
eggie (2019-05-27 21:41:55+00:00): Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot. Beperk je tot een straat. Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op.
Geef concreet aan wat je doet.  
Probeer je eerst in te lezen voordat je verder mapt.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-05-27 21:44:20+00:00): Je tekent een gebouw over andere gebouwen heen. Kinderdagverblijf de Boefies
Waarom is dat?
Gebouwen zijn allemaal import vanuit het Kadaster.
Gebouwen krijgen geen adres en worden niet zelf ingetekend.
eggie (2019-05-27 21:45:54+00:00): Ik zie hier te veel schade en edits die niet kloppen . Ik zet je bijdragen terug, want ze komen niet met de werkelijkheid overeen.
eggie (2019-05-27 21:52:16+00:00): Een schoolterrein tag je op een vlak met amenity=school en niet nog een keer met een building=school. dan zie je een heel gebouw over alle andere gebouwen heen. Adresnodes zijn al aanwezig op gebouwen. 
Je loopt wat hard van stapel en daardoor ontstaat er schade. Begin met één ding toe te voegen en sla dan op. Nu gaan ook je goede eits verloren bij revert.
Wanneer je vragen hebt kun je gerust reageren.
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-27 21:54:22+00:00): reverted door  Wijzigingenset #70675878
eggie (2019-05-27 22:15:26+00:00): PB contact
eggie (2019-05-27 22:20:52+00:00): Het kinderdagverblijf kun je gewoon bijtaggen op de adresnode.
trial (2019-06-09 19:10:52+00:00): Je propose de supprimer le fixme : vu la taille et l'unicité du site sur le terrain c'est de toute évidence des sanitaires (toilettes et douche) et non amenity=sanitary_dump_station.
Je suis de plus pour mettre 2 amenity, shower et toilets plutôt qu'un toilets=yes. C'est ce qui se fait en général dans les campings.
frosm (2024-08-30 10:02:45+00:00): c'est fait
Dmytro O (2019-08-21 08:25:30+00:00): Please consider sidewalk=both/right/left on highway=* instead of drawing new roads. It simplifies maintenance and does not introduce weird intersections where (for routing) you have to join sidewalks on both sides of the road

For details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
Dmytro O (2019-08-21 08:26:38+00:00): If you bother about how map looks like in browser - it is just the question of rendering. AFAIK map developers are working on it
Dmytro O (2019-08-21 09:29:50+00:00): Regarding routing: https://ibb.co/C9GYgD1
Dmytro O (2019-08-21 10:15:42+00:00): Few more: https://i.postimg.cc/h4whPvr9/Sidewalks-Routing4.png
CC_Simon (2019-05-30 11:53:14+00:00): hello，Did you delete the bridge layer？
香園圍公路
CC_Simon (2019-05-30 11:54:31+00:00): in the past
CC_Simon (2019-05-30 11:54:55+00:00): coz i cant find the data
Kovoschiz (2019-05-30 15:49:27+00:00): What do you mean?
Kovoschiz (2019-05-30 15:51:54+00:00): They are still there, no?
Kovoschiz (2019-06-26 17:36:28+00:00): @ZIV OSM I know now. There's a de facto edit war between you two: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70614348. I restored your `man_made=bridge`s for now.
Arnebius (2019-06-12 10:27:43+00:00): Poza dodaniem numeru adresowego, proszę dodawać również nazwę miejscowości do adresu.
Luuuddooo (2020-01-06 20:00:40+00:00): Hello,
I switched back the stream name to "Le Gardon".
The stream named Baravon seems to be a little in the south: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488752271
Dimacn (2019-05-28 10:42:35+00:00): Вы удалили тег building со здания. Или это уже не здание?
PaulMorel (2019-05-28 20:57:35+00:00): I've always wondered, what exacly IS the best practice for strip malls like this? Would separate areas/building footprints for each business be better than individual points?
DannyMcD (2019-05-29 16:04:00+00:00): I used to favour separate areas for businesses, but it becomes a real mess, and it is much more time-consuming.  So I generally just add points now, unless it is easy to separate the footprints based on aerial imagery.
atomwaffen (2019-05-27 23:06:53+00:00): .. and update the tagging of some wastewater plants.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-21 01:48:12+00:00): observed while investigating
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
 
- malicious removal of wood tag from protected forest, clearly showing wood
- deletion and drawing again some water features
- malicious deletion of other water features
 
partially restored
Allison P (2019-05-28 18:28:25+00:00): This reverts an addition with its source listed as Google.
Dimacn (2019-05-28 10:46:50+00:00): Вы некорректно оформляете дворовую территорию. 1. Ваши линии деревьев вообще не к месту. Нет смысла во дворе рисовать лес. 2. В name пишем только официальные названия https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  3. Не следует использовать тег leisure=park для обозначения благоустроенных дворовых территорий. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  3. Пожалуйста исправьте.
Dimacn (2019-07-30 17:53:06+00:00): Ваш пакет правок отменён. Причина: были добавлены несуществующие ряды деревьев с "дикой" геометрией, был добавлен парк-точка во дворах жилого дома.
dieterdreist (2019-05-28 16:39:44+00:00): Hi, I have noticed you have changed quite some crossing=zebra to an undocumented tag (crossing=marked). Can you give me a hint what is the idea behind this?
Thank you,
Martin
freebeer (2019-05-28 16:52:39+00:00): i am disturbed by this too, as it seems information of importance both for pedestrians and drivers, is being lost to the validator.  that may not be relevant everywhere in the world.

for me, a zebra crossing is a special legal concept and is different from a marked non-zebra crossing - whose status probably also means something.

are you manually making these changes and choosing to delete the zebra/pelican/whatever info to match your circumstances?  there seem to be far more changes here than would apply to a manual fix-up, and i'd hate to see this applied to parts of the world where it matters.

thanks.
Allison P (2019-05-28 17:35:30+00:00): Yes, this was all from the validator. The validator automatically suggests changing crossing=zebra to crossing=marked and can do this completely automatically. It's possible the changeset tags for what issues were fixed is broken. Anyway, I didn't know about this controversy regarding certain tag changes, so I will turn off issues regarding "outdated" tags. Also, I don't think the tag crossing=zebra means much to Americans; I've only heard it being referred to as a marked crosswalk. I don't really see the difference or what data is being lost, but I'm not sure why iD would suggest that change. I'll make sure the validator avoids doing that in the future. The changes are automatic, too; I didn't see how they were different so at the time the tag change seemed fair to me.
Allison P (2019-05-28 17:40:03+00:00): One more thing: I didn't notice the validator changing crossings besides zebra, and I didn't even know there were different crossing types named after different animals. The problem is that they don't make any sense for most people in the US, since we have different names. I personally don't have separate names for each type of crossing, and I don't know of anyone who does. I think it's a bit questionable that this was included in iD if it's nowhere near agreed upon.
DaveF (2019-05-28 17:42:50+00:00): This, & other iD 'validations' are very worrying 
The correct tagging for crossing with painted white stripes is:
    highway=crossing
    crossing=uncontrolled (if it hasn't any vehicle restricting lights)
    crossing_ref=zebra

I note this was performed in around 30 seconds. I don't use iD. Is it possible to collect data together for a mass edit similar to how it can be done in JOSM?
dieterdreist (2019-05-28 17:43:54+00:00): Thank you for replying. To be fair, I have seen some gorgeous "outdated tags" improvements in iD recently (referring to wikidata integration when you add a chain name to a shop in the name tag you will get suggestions to auto-add brand and wikidata tags for this brand, really cool), but there are controversies (currently discussed on talk and tagging mail list) with the crossing tags and eventually more, so turning them completely off may get you rid of some cool stuff as well, just be careful and when in doubt, reluctant ;-)

Have fun mapping!
Cheers,
Martin
Allison P (2019-05-28 18:25:36+00:00): I'll go through the list manually from now on and fix other kinds of tags but leave the crossings be. I'm not usually an on the ground mapper because my area is very suburban and there's nothing useful to map here so I haven't really familiarised myself with the tagging for features that can only be determined from being on the ground or looking at 360 photos. My usual area is very inactive so I almost never get feedback on my edits.
Allison P (2019-05-28 18:34:18+00:00): @DaveF, this changeset wasn't that quick. I opened up JOSM while working on this changeset to revert something else that I knew the validator couldn't fix.

iD is very inefficient; I'm not an expert coder but since changesets can't be saved in files I think it's stored in memory; but since sites can't directly do that the end result is JOSM barely slows down after making tens of thousands of changes and iD locks up after around 1000 on even the most high-end consumer computers. Thus many changesets are necessary for what can be done in one on JOSM.
dieterdreist (2019-05-28 18:42:23+00:00): I can understand you're astonished about the publicity, it is because you have been featured on the talk mailing list ;-)  
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-May/082575.html
Allison P (2019-05-28 19:25:08+00:00): Well, I suppose it did have to come up at some point. Most of the details are accurate, but I do actually run editing sessions in tandem sometimes. I also am familiar with using JOSM, but I prefer iD most of the time because it's easier to use. My changesets took significantly longer than what people were saying; 30-60 seconds was the time it took for the changes to be uploaded and the changeset closed (as iD does automatically)
freebeer (2019-05-28 20:06:27+00:00): hi reid,
thanks for your feedback about how tagging applies to you locally.  i just spent the last hours reviewing the osm wiki entries for tagging crossings to see how things currently stand.  then i got lost trying to catch up on the discussion this month on the tagging list where i tuned out before a conclusion was reached, that seems to be vaguely related to the marked crossing change here.

if i understand you, and it also appears crossing=zebra may also be an iD addition the authors now want to backpedal, the way the road is marked, be it zebra stripes, parallel lines, dotted lines ... makes no legal difference in your mapping area, which appears to what the iD developers are going on, while the wiki page as well as the linked wikipaedia page points to other parts of the world with significant differences, and i am unsure if the zebra value in osm data merely outlines the physical difference, or if it can also be a guide to routers.

which means your edits here probably have not damaged the map, but definitely would be likely to do so in much of the rest of the world, where the zebra info will get lost (rather than the current suggestion of _ref that iD is not using in addition to an undocumented tagging apparently from the mailing list, but then again after not even half the now 78 page index, i again glazed over once more)

this is of course for the iD developers to address, but as they have outright rejected the mailing lists and wiki pages, i'm not holding my breath about this item as it seems to be a candidate needing manual review against aerials and by country, not to automate.

i noted i was unable to automagically create such a zebra crossing in potlatch 2, and i can't guess how many of the numbers on the list i saw thrown about originate in iD and are inaccurate.

thanks for your understanding.
Zverik (2019-05-29 08:18:30+00:00): Hi, you have added barrier=kerb to highway=crossing nodes, and with that you seem to have introduced quite a few routing issues. Like, a barrier on a pedestrian crossing is the same as a barrier on a road, and thus you've marked some non-existent barriers on Manhattan streets. Was that a well-thought decision?
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-28 16:27:43+00:00): Hello! Would it be OK for you to split future edits into more parts, in other words save more often?

This edit edits 618 objects at once.
Allison P (2019-05-28 17:37:07+00:00): For sure! The validator catches so many different issues that this changeset was made in like five minutes, so I'm already saving pretty often, but it made my high-end PC start to freeze up, and others have expressed that it's difficult to see what changes have been made.
Pietrofù (2019-05-28 15:04:05+00:00): #hotosm-project-5742 #TanzaniaDevelopmentTrust #womenconnect #youthmapperswomenconnect Karatu missing buildings
Geogast (2021-08-04 17:15:27+00:00): Olá! Faz um bom tempo te escrevi pelas faixas de ônibus na Av. Atlântica. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71261923 No fim de semana passado passei novamente por ai. O que eu vi foi que as partes onde a faixa de ônibus são segregadas das faixas comuns são pouquissimos metros; quase nada. IMHO, isso não justifica desenhar as faixas de ônibus por separadas.
Geogast (2021-08-04 17:31:56+00:00): só para completar: Na Avenida Teotônia Vilela é a mesma coisa: Não há faixas de ônibus segregadas em praticamente nenhum lugar.
Pietrofù (2019-05-28 15:03:45+00:00): #hotosm-project-5742 #TanzaniaDevelopmentTrust #womenconnect #youthmapperswomenconnect Karatu missing buildings
M!dgard (2019-05-28 00:24:05+00:00): The source of maxspeed=10 is survey.
mapman44 (2019-05-28 23:09:42+00:00): Thanks for adding that street. Just a note: the number of lanes should be added only if the lanes are actually marked with lines on the street.  It's not a big deal but one that I messed up in my town. I had half the streets marked when I saw what OSM Wiki says about it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70677549
mapman44 (2019-05-28 23:06:31+00:00): It's good practice to provide a little more information in your changeset comments. For example, you could have said "Updates to driveway at Fox Hollow Elementary School." That just helps other mappers understand just what you changed. Keep up the good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70677608
Pietrofù (2019-05-28 15:03:22+00:00): #hotosm-project-5742 #TanzaniaDevelopmentTrust #womenconnect #youthmapperswomenconnect Karatu missing buildings
Supaplex (2019-08-09 16:21:46+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-28 05:12:03+00:00): Hi wastatehorsepark, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped highway paths in this area? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70677856

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
Frans S (2019-05-28 11:48:58+00:00): Hello Skylev. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. I noticed that you mapped building also with the tag area=yes. That is wrong. Just tag a building as building=yes.
And... Don't forget to square the buildings you've mapped.

Thank you and keep mapping
DaveF (2020-03-28 18:50:09+00:00): Hi
Do you know what the local_ref tag which you amended at this station refers to?

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/454194172
Djminisite (2020-03-29 22:16:20+00:00): off the top of my head no - i think its erroneous from the original data import - if anything it should be the platform number for that side of the station?
44Calvados (2019-05-28 10:14:25+00:00): An diesem Ort befindet sich eine Kneipe mit Namen: Wurm.
Geöffnet 7 Tage die Woche ab 11:00
URL: www.gasthausWurmsb.de
vectro (2024-06-08 02:59:12+00:00): Do you mind if I ask why these roads were marked as private? I don't see any signage to that effect.
aharvey (2019-05-28 04:14:55+00:00): Hey I noticed you deleted the barrier I just added at https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/6505084855.

I surveyed this Sunday and the block was there, did you notice it was removed in the last two days?
rivermont (2019-06-08 17:54:45+00:00): Hi Aglis, please check the ways that you are editing. Many of the rivers are duplicates of rivers that I drew almost a year ago. Many small canals or streams are also tagged as rivers, which is incorrect.
Aglis IRM-ED (2019-06-10 01:19:06+00:00): hi rivermont, thank you for your review. i actually work in easten area from this changset. so, i dont working on the issue that you review. its been other contributor. you can fix it kindly. thank you.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-04-06 04:14:47+00:00): halo bang. i little bit modify (uglue/remove) way/234179851 due error twice segment. but don't be worried. i keep the original one. 
thank you
Allison P (2019-05-31 06:29:15+00:00): The name tag is not for describing a feature. Please leave it blank for features that don't have names, such as the swimming pools in this changeset or carports you have mapped previously. Thank you!
GeraldHe (2019-07-12 07:44:55+00:00): Im Bezirk Perg läuft ein Projekt, bei dem die Daten vom BEV händisch mit jenen von OSM abgeglichen werden. Abweichungen werden dokumentiert und im Herbst an die Gemeinden rückgemeldet.
Unser Projekt macht diesen Massenimport nichtig - deshalb werde ich dieses ChangeSet reverten.
user_1470980 (2019-07-12 10:48:50+00:00): Wenn ich Euch irgendwie behilflich sein kann, lasst es mich bitte wissen. Tipp: Adressen in notes umwandeln. Sobald Euer Projekt abgeschlossen ist, helfe ich gerne beim sauberen entfernen der Import Daten. Lg Johann