piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dieterdreist (2026-07-14 10:11:46+00:00): Hi, I noticed you left this object without an addr:housenumber tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026841505/history
user_2066394 (2022-07-14 23:38:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078667078
Im nördlichen Teil an sich auch nochmal andere Dachform bzw. Gebäudeteil?
zflow (2022-07-15 06:35:55+00:00): Ja, ist ein Versuch die Dachformen gemessen an osmbuildings korrekt darzustellen. Es handelt sich dabei tatsächlich um zahlreiche angrenzende Einzelbauwerke.
porfiriopaiz (2022-07-17 05:51:11+00:00): Hello  erickdeoliveiraleal,

Could you please stop doing what you are doing by removing and changing the position and tags of bus stops?

You just deleted 4 bus platforms and moved a couple of these into converting them to stop positions, what is the point of doing this?

What do you mean by "personal POIs"?

Please provide an explanation on what you are trying to accomplish with this.

I will have to revert this changeset.

Regards,
Porfirio
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-17 13:13:35+00:00): Good morning. Sorry, it was a bad edition. thank you for pointing out.
marczoutendijk (2022-07-16 19:33:30+00:00): Waarom map je hier een barrier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077537739/history
en haal je die 4 dagen later weer weg?
Waarom verwijder je een path:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/810427138/history
zonder overleg?
JeroenvanderGun (2022-07-18 10:09:42+00:00): Ik zag dat je in deze changeset hier de recent door mij toegevoegde operator=Rijkswaterstaat weer had weggehaald. Neem aan dat dat per ongeluk was, heb het weer hersteld.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123755602
PT-53 (2022-07-16 05:40:24+00:00): Hallo Helmuth,
Diese Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078674792/history
hat noch (?) keine Merkmale und ist auch nicht Mitglied eines MP
Grüße
Peter
seichter (2022-07-16 18:59:42+00:00): ergänzt
MxxCon (2022-07-15 04:17:01+00:00): Based on your photo this seems more like a pop-up covid testing facility or an urgent care office rather than a medical laboratory?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123628526
Corey Kosak (2022-07-15 05:14:45+00:00): It's a walk-in lab location. There are lots of these in the greater NYC area (from both LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics), and yes, they do have the vibe of an urgent care clinic.

I'm surprised at your question, so maybe this is not the norm where you live? I'm not sure I exactly understand your question, but to be clear, it's not a "lab" in the sense that it is a central laboratory for blood testing with a lot of machines and stuff. Rather, it's a retail walk-in center staffed with technicians whose purpose is to draw blood, take urine samples, perform employee drug testing, that kind of thing.

For example, when I have my annual physical, my doctor doesn't draw my blood himself. Instead he writes up an order and tells me to go find a LabCorp or Quest office to get my blood drawn and tested.

If it helps, if you were to go to labcorp.com and "search for a walk-in lab location near you" you could find this very location I'm referring to here: (screenshot)  https://i.imgur.com/1TziflF.png

Hope that helps!!
MxxCon (2022-07-15 05:18:52+00:00): I'm in Brooklyn.
I thought that healthcare=laboratory wasn't intended for publicly accessible locations, but I was wrong. According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare%3Dlaboratory your edit is fine.
Corey Kosak (2022-07-15 05:23:00+00:00): Ah, ok. BTW I didn't even add that tag myself. It was filled in for me by the web editing tool when I told it the node was a LabCorp.
MxxCon (2022-07-15 04:23:28+00:00): Generally roads inside of public cemeteries have "access=permissive", ie anybody is welcome unless you get kicked out.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dpermissive. And often it's also "bicycle=no", although maybe not in every case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123628544
larryv (2022-07-15 05:06:29+00:00): Thanks! The roads were already tagged this way when I began working on them, but I decided to fix them later to keep the changeset focused. "Permissive" makes sense.
emersonveenstra (2022-07-15 01:00:32+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to delete a node from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/647539401 and drag the pharmacy node to there?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123628616
user_5359 (2022-08-30 18:10:53+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/relation/14354022. Please notice admin_level=2 is reserved for a country. the lower level is for bigger object (like a Continents). 
Please correct this value
MxxCon (2022-07-15 04:27:43+00:00): If you know the location of each section, you could consider mapping them as well like in this cemetery https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1067214883
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123628793
larryv (2022-07-15 05:09:24+00:00): Oh neat, I didn't know this was a thing. I think I *will* map the sections, then.
AjBelnuovo (2022-12-16 00:44:21+00:00): Qual é a fonte do nome da via ?
tarta (2022-12-16 01:04:50+00:00): Boa noite. Lembro de ter usado a camado do IBGE no JOSM, esqueci de marcar a tag source E a camada hoje não está disponível no JOSM(não encontrei aqui em um a busca rápida)
AjBelnuovo (2022-12-16 01:35:25+00:00): Então terá que fazer algumas correções, já que não é permitido abreviações no OSM.
tarta (2022-12-16 11:22:11+00:00): Não encontrei nesse changeset abreviações, poderia citar, por favor?
AjBelnuovo (2022-12-16 12:04:08+00:00): Av. Pastor Jonas Teles da Silva;
R.Maurício Fonseca Pereira ;
R.Pastor Walter Donald
tarta (2022-12-18 12:27:22+00:00): Então AjBelnuovo, como você deve ter visto, essas edições que inseriram nomes com abreviações não foram feitas por mim, em uma eu só editei a mesma via em algum outro momento no passado(Pastor Jonas Teles da Silva), em outras eu nunca editei(Maurício Fonseca Pereira e Pastor Walter Donald)
tarta (2022-12-18 12:29:22+00:00): Relacionando isso à pergunta inicial, eu não sei de onde vieram esses nome, não sei a fonte, é preciso perguntar a quem editou para saber se está de acordo com as Políticas da Comunidade.
Não vou alterar nada porque não sei dessas respostas.
AjBelnuovo (2022-12-18 12:34:01+00:00): Ok. Vamos aguardar .
RicoElectrico (2022-07-15 00:02:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3211553 - chyba Twoja uwaga, do zamknięcia? :)
Frans S (2022-08-19 15:16:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
You mapped quite a lot of fictional buildings. Pieces of farmland and woods as a building. Please be sure you map buildings. See the advices at the end of this message.
I had to revert your wrongly mapped objects.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123629210
ZeLonewolf (2022-09-04 01:16:00+00:00): Hello,

Are you able to fix the border of Anna, TX?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6601316
user_8101879 (2022-09-04 13:50:18+00:00): Hello,

what do you want exactly ? Because the relation is ok (not broken) : http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=6601316.

In this changeset I just removed ways with a beginning on the outer borders and with a end nowhere : 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123629364, I didn't changed the outer borders.

My note in the comment of this changeset is a sort of "fixme", feel free to improve this relation if you want.

Best regards
ZeLonewolf (2022-09-04 16:01:41+00:00): Never mind, it's good, I was looking at an old QA output. Sorry for the false alarm!
gscholz (2022-07-18 05:55:32+00:00): Hi "canto do gallo",
this changeset seems to make no sense at all despite of being vandalism. Please educate yourself about this topic:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-07-18 05:55:58+00:00): BTW, I have reverted it.
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
foxox (2022-07-15 12:19:27+00:00): *Media
user_14547832 (2022-07-15 02:52:01+00:00): That Changeset is not that large..
felipeeugenio (2022-07-15 15:37:34+00:00): Hola Alonso. Porqué borras edificios perfectamente visibles en las fotos satelitales? Los demolieron?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123631191
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-09 17:20:43+00:00): Reverted
just_another_mapper (2022-07-15 03:52:05+00:00): Seems I hit the changeset word limit. That last sentence was meant to say "between cycleway & shared crossing".
InsertUser (2022-07-15 20:12:42+00:00): Cadastral parcels not used of course, surprised an overlay responding only with an error was included in the list.
drnoble (2024-12-09 20:35:48+00:00): Hi, these cables are marked as 33kV, but this article [1] states they are 66kV. Curious if you have a better source, or if they should be changed?
Cheers, Donald

[1] https://www.offshore-mag.com/field-development/article/14071989/jdr-adapting-power-cables-for-hywind-tampen-floating-wind-farm
Gazer75 (2024-12-10 23:58:39+00:00): Most articles quotes 33kV that I could find. Maybe that is just the internal cabling while the cables to the platforms are at 66kV.
drnoble (2024-12-20 13:05:54+00:00): Cheers, looked into this a bit more and perhaps they were planing 33kV, as this is on some pages as you say, but changed to 66kV during hte design phase. The Equinor page also states 66kV, so I've updated it.
https://www.equinor.com/energy/hywind-tampen
Gazer75 (2024-12-20 13:09:53+00:00): It is most likely 33k internally and then transformed to 66kV for the cables to the platforms. No wind farm I know use more than 33kV from each turbine due to size of equipment. The generators are often 690V and then a transformer at the base ups this to 33kV.
drnoble (2024-12-20 13:21:33+00:00): The Guide to a Floating Offshore Wind Farm states "Array cables are typically rated at 66 kV. In the next few years, array cable voltages are expected to increase to 132 kV."

https://guidetofloatingoffshorewind.com/guide/b-balance-of-plant/b-1-cables/b-1-1-array-cable/
Gazer75 (2024-12-20 13:26:59+00:00): Cable rating and actual operating voltage is not the same. I believe they landed on 33kV to avoid having to do heavy modifications on the platforms. Space is already limited for power handling. It seems they landed on JDR Cable Systems to provide these 66kV cables. They are designed to break if there is a problem with the mooring of the turbines to avoid pulling on the rest.
Gazer75 (2024-12-20 13:29:46+00:00): Only way to know for sure is to contact Equinor directly, but I'm not sure they would respond to such a question.
felipeeugenio (2022-07-15 15:37:08+00:00): Alonso. En cuanto a los dibujos de las casas, borraste todas las que estaban bien hechas y agregaste casas mal hechas. Tu sabes que no son solo un edificio continuo. Son varias casas pegadas. Por favor reponer las casas cómo estaban.

Revisa ciudades Europeas para que veas como están dibujadas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123632744
felipeeugenio (2022-07-15 16:01:10+00:00): Ahí dejé dibujado algo un poco mejor dada la calidad de las fotos
schueszel (2022-07-17 08:43:21+00:00): Moin,
betreffend Objekt 79670762, B76 Schleswig - Eckernförde:
wäre es nicht besser gewesen, wegen des separat eingezeichneten benutzungspflichtigen Radwegs die B76 mit "bicycle=use-sidepath" zu kennzeichnen?

VG

Jan
thetornado76 (2022-07-17 19:14:30+00:00): Hallo Jan,
Gute Frage. Ich habe beide Varianten bisher als gleichwertig angesehen. Nach erneuten Studium des Wiki ist aber bicycle=use-sidepath wohl die bessere Variante bei benutzungspflichtigen Radwegen. 
Gruß Daniel
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-15 13:33:38+00:00): please, dont use bing to realign images, bing is misaligned. use maxar layer.
Supaplex (2022-07-15 07:49:43+00:00): Hi 您好：

請問這辦公室是用原先的 Visa 辦公室嗎?如果不是不應該直接改原先 Visa 辦公室的節點
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123636820
馬來西亞觀光局 (2022-07-15 08:13:00+00:00): 對不起, 那就還原VISA TAIWAN.  我再另設馬來西亞觀光局. 謝謝告知.
ndm (2022-07-15 18:40:19+00:00): Have they removed the metal marker?
Bramble (2022-07-16 10:01:03+00:00): Sorry, I didn't see it. I'm happy to put it back - or you can?
Apologies for my error. I was reacting to it being a Viewpoint, which I didn't understand as it comes out as very significant when printing a map of Bristol centre.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
eggie (2022-07-15 07:59:40+00:00): Beste Werner..  Houd er svp rekening mee dat je geen wegen kunt splitsen met editor iD met routerelaties. Die gaan allemaal stuk.
Dit kan alleen met editor JOSM.
Dit splitsen levert alleen maar schade op.
Schakel svp over op editor JOSM.
Daar heb je een relatie-venster en kun je alle routes achteraf nog even checken.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-15 08:23:50+00:00): Routerelatie N9 hersteld
eggie (2022-07-15 08:25:22+00:00): Tip.. En... wanneer je gaat splitsen met JOSM dan ook steeds op één plaats tegelijk.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
user_2066394 (2022-07-15 09:56:09+00:00): Bergbahnen?
SekeRob (2022-07-15 13:13:09+00:00): Ciao

Capacità di ricarica? In genere 2 auto, ma anche essiste con 4.

Grazie
nubifer (2022-07-15 15:58:08+00:00): Ciao, il problema che a volte il numero delle prese non coincide con quello dei parcheggi, e, peggio ancora, alcune colonnine Enel X anche se hanno due prese erogano solo su una per volta. Come capacità di ricarica che si intende? le prese o i parcheggi?
SekeRob (2022-07-15 16:21:08+00:00): Mi credo che il parcheggio sia un buon indicatore. Esistono diversi tipi di colonne incl. colonne con 2 prese ma diverse o simili a wiki "Fornire il numero di veicoli che possono essere caricati contemporaneamente attraverso il tag capacità = * sarà il prossimo tag più utile."
La località Ferri ha 3 colonne, parcheggio giallo, ma nessuna segmentazione d'accordo miei telecamera ;o)
nubifer (2022-07-15 16:44:03+00:00): Ecco, prendendo ad esempio proprio la stazione di via F. Ferri ( https://nextcharge.app/map?lang=it&station=OCPI-130-EVOS_thing6907&provider=Enel%20X&location=42.349655,14.179265 ) ci sono tre colonnine con due prese ciascuna (una tipo 2 ed una tipo 3A) per un totale di 6 prese, ma in quello spazio a disposizione di auto al massimo ne entrano 4 (le foto su nextcharge le ho fatte io). Che ci mettiamo come capacità? 6 prese? 4 posti auto? 3 dal momento che quel tipo di  colonnina supporta una presa in carica alla volta?
SekeRob (2022-07-15 17:02:23+00:00): l più basso dei due, 3 come numero di ricarica simultanea..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
eggie (2022-07-15 16:30:30+00:00): Dag Ken,
Wanneer dit woonstraten in aanleg zijn is het oke.
Ik heb de straatnaam van de kruising gehaald en construction=residential toegevoegd

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123638272

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
arvdk (2022-07-15 07:43:31+00:00): A few things went wrong when uploading... I'm currently fixing it in a new changeset.
arvdk (2022-07-15 07:49:37+00:00): Hopefully, everything is fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123639327
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
adreamy (2023-10-13 04:49:49+00:00): Tags should only represent properties.
Do not use tags for descriptions.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
mini-me (2022-07-15 10:17:17+00:00): Во-первых, у вас половина полей заполнена неправильно. Смотрите справку:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:cuisine
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone
итд.
Во-вторых, вы указали адрес Петровский 24 к1, а точку поставили на соседнем 22 к2
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
literan (2022-07-17 20:05:11+00:00): добрый день. корректный тег для точек подъездов - entrance=staircase
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
ma-rt-in (2022-07-17 16:17:06+00:00): Hallo,
die Verwendung von tracktype und highway=path hat leider keinen mehrwert, versucht bitte surface und smoothness zu ergänzen.

vg
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
syntex (2022-07-20 19:28:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077417940 Tu na pewno jest droga?
PanWanek (2022-07-20 19:32:20+00:00): Tak, właśnie powstaje i jest już przejezdna.