piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ndm (2018-01-22 22:21:33+00:00): Not sure why this is an improvement? It's handy to have yogscast mapped as they run meetups in Bristol. The housename's already mapped. If you want to map the other building levels then please do so without disturbing what's already there.
Guy (2018-01-22 22:36:48+00:00): Replaced - back to Yogscast. Not sure it should be prominent here as they are one tenant among many in the site and the building name is actually *King William House* not Yogscast. Surely we should map for what is on the ground rather than one (of several) tenants?
ndm (2018-01-22 22:50:03+00:00): Must admit I wondered about that originally -- but then https://techspark.co/bristol-based-yogscast-share-how-to-reach-7b-views-on-youtube/ -- so that's why it has "level=4". I'll let someone else do the  whole multi-level mapping for the other levels :-)


If it's the building name, then surely it should be addr:housename.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-17 13:57:13+00:00): se é sem nome deixe-o em branco, não coloque "sem nome" no nome https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554991147
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
matt_ellery (2018-01-22 22:23:40+00:00): Nice, thanks!
belugabob (2018-01-23 20:18:44+00:00): matt_twam_asi - i have a question, that you may be able to answer.

The changes that I made seem to be only visible at certain zoom levels, with the origial path still being shown when zoomed out a little further - see these two links...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.08644/-0.20202

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.08670/-0.20023

Do I have to make the changes at various zoom levels, or am I missing something?
matt_ellery (2018-01-23 20:51:12+00:00): You only have to make the changes once - the different zoom levels render at different times. The full technical explanation is pretty long and I'm no expert on it, so I won't be able to help ;-) but the changes will show up eventually. It's unlikely to take more than a few days.
belugabob (2018-01-23 21:32:10+00:00): Ok, that kind of makes sense, thanks.

Will give it a while.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:47:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
MapGardener (2018-01-23 20:48:43+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55668289
user_1470980 (2018-01-24 17:18:07+00:00): Thanks, but I do not need reviews from Mapbox https://tinyurl.com/y97c6ey6
MapGardener (2018-01-25 10:33:22+00:00): Hi! Actually, I'm not from Mapbox, I just use their tool to state that a particular changeset has been positively reviewed. (I also don't use their tool for reviews because the satellite imagery is sometimes outdated) Since your changeset covers a large area and (at least for me) the correctness was not instantly obvious, I wanted to indicate that I have double checked the changes. By submitting a review, I intend to avoid duplicate work. Would it be fine if I directly post a comment when I review one of your changesets next time?
Regarding the linked changeset review I cannot say much because I don't know the area well. Sorry!
Best regards, Michael
Nakaner-repair (2018-02-11 23:56:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 56277501, 56277015, 56277682, 56275296 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and undiscussed address import/mass modification by user geocodec. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2018-February/009114.html. This also reverts some other bad edits which rely on versions uploaded by this import.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:46:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:52:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:00:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:59:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:58:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:00:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
literan (2018-01-23 10:31:34+00:00): нет такого парка: https://www.google.ru/search?newwindow=1&dcr=0&ei=yg5nWrq1Hse2sQG_2a2IAQ&q=%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA+%22%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B%D0%B5+%D0%94%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%22&oq=%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BA+%22%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B%D0%B5+%D0%94%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%8C%D1%8F%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3...5848.9503.0.9751.6.6.0.0.0.0.75.364.6.6.0....0...1c.2.64.psy-ab..0.2.119...0j0i22i30k1j0i67k1.0.nuuiiyrJ8kM Не надо вносить в базу выдуманные объекты, которых нет на местности. Будете упорствовать - будете заблокированы.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
eggie (2018-01-23 08:04:39+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2018-01-23 08:06:43+00:00): Je hebt hier een vlak gemaakt met de naam drink_water. Dat lijkt me niet goed. Ik zal wat aanpassen. Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-01-23 08:12:12+00:00): Wat was je bedoeling?
Een drinkwater tappunt zet je op een node.
brassica (2018-01-27 04:39:06+00:00): Bedankt voor de info. Het is nu gelukt de drinkwaterkraan toe te voegen. Eerder zag ik de node-optie niet, ik zal het vlak verwijderen.
brassica (2018-01-27 04:48:23+00:00): Iets makkelijker gezegd dan gedaan, ik vind de edit-knop niet. Wellicht kan iemand het vlak verwijderen?
eggie (2018-01-29 11:34:10+00:00): Dag yticaa... Dat vlak had ik al verwijderd. Bedankt voor je reactie
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:57:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mueschel (2018-01-24 11:46:04+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the key "payment:#only' on this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5355583622

It's not used on any other object.

Cheers, Jan
mavl (2018-01-27 15:55:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
viloan (2018-01-22 22:40:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:57:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
eggie (2018-01-23 07:31:20+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2018-01-23 07:35:51+00:00): Ik zie dat je gebouwen hebt omgetagd naar boerenerf. Dat is niet de bedoeling.
De kinderboerderij heb je ook van de tga ontdaan. Verder kruisen er wat vlakken over elkaar heen. Ik kijk even verder  naar je edit.
eggie (2018-01-23 07:58:45+00:00): De tag kinderboerderij heb ik teruggezet en de gebouwen hersteld. De kruisende vlakken heb ik aaneengesloten en waar het plakwerk niet nodig was bij het pad heb ik het losgemaakt. 
Niet te snel werk van andere mappers veranderen. Je kunt de voorgaande mapper ook inseinen. Bv geen kinderboerderij  of hertenkamp? aangetroffen en daarom verwijderd. 
Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-01-23 12:04:43+00:00): Middels PB contact gehad.
user_5359 (2018-01-23 04:54:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263822324 ? Your entry is a duplicate entry.
eggie (2018-01-23 07:38:00+00:00):  Het is niet gebruikelijk Leisure=garden te mappen in achtertuinen. Een barrier=hedge wordt meestal niet op een vlak aangegeven, maar op een way (lijn)
eggie (2018-01-23 07:54:58+00:00): De heg zou je kunnen mappen als natural=scrub  (bosschage)
De tuinen zou ik weghalen.
Graag concreet commentaar bij je edits. Verder aanvullingen zegt niemand wat.
user_5359 (2018-01-23 04:51:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
abakus_uploader (2018-01-23 23:33:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-08 12:38:12+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1419834 ?
Glassman (2018-01-23 06:35:27+00:00): I thought Pass Island was already part of Deception Pass Park but it doesn't appear to be. According to the state it should be part of the park. I wonder when it got removed.
R0bst3r (2018-01-28 19:18:43+00:00): Hallo dieterdreist,
als lokaler Mapper, der sich durchaus als Württemberger fühlt, find ich das löschen dieser Relation nicht besonders gut, da die Diskussion auf der Mailing Liste auch anscheinend keine lokalen Mapper mit einbezieht, find ich das schon etwas dreist. Ein Großteil der Mapper hier ist dort einfach nicht vertreten.
Was macht es für einen Sinn Württemberg zu löschen, aber Baden zu erhalten? Wir als nächstes der Limes gelöscht? 
Frag mal einen Badener, was er von Württemberger hält? Oder anders herum.
Badischer Wein, von der Sonne verwöhnt. Kenner trinken Württemberger. Selbst da trennt man.
Jedem Grenzgänger sind die Grenzen auch heute noch bekannt. So historisch wie gedacht ist das alles gar nicht.
Viele Grüße
R0bst3r (2018-01-29 08:02:54+00:00): Um es klarer zu stellen, hier wurde nicht nur die Relation Kgr Württemberg gelöscht, sondern auch die deckungsgleiche Region Württemberg! Landes-/ Kirchenverbände, Initiativen, Vereine und Unterregionen bilden sich daraus, z.B: Ost-Württemberg.
Zu vergleichen mit anderen ehemaligen Ländern wie z.B. Mecklenburg, welche als Bezeichner für Regionen bestehen bleiben.
OF0 (2018-01-29 09:56:36+00:00): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krautheim_%28Jagst%29?wprov=sfla1

Krautheim gehörte früher zu Baden, jetzt zum Hoheohekreis. Der TSV spielt immer noch in badischen Ligen, wie zum Beispiel der Kreisliga Buchen oder der Landesliga Odenwald. In der auch der SV Viktoria Wertheim und der VfR Gerlachsheim. Ich glaub' das löschen war nicht so gut. Daraus abgeleitete Grenzen sind noch in Verwendung.
Nakaner (2018-01-29 10:16:11+00:00): OSM ist ein Projekt für Daten der Gegenwart und nicht für historische Grenzen.
dieterdreist (2018-01-29 12:37:24+00:00): Ich bin auch Württemberger, zumindest bin ich dort geboren und habe dort jahrzehntelang gewohnt (inzwischen nicht mehr), eine gute "allgemeine" Ortskenntnis würde ich mir daher auch unterstellen.
Zu den Anmerkungen:
@R0bst3r Ich habe keine Relationen für Kirchenverbände, Iniitiativen, Vereine und Unterregionen gelöscht. Als "Region" würde ich "Württemberg" eher nicht sehen, Regionen wären z.B. Schwaben, Bodensee-Oberschwaben, Hohenlohe, Neckar-Alb, etc., dafür haben wir in OSM aber eigentlich auch keine ordentlichen Abbildungsmöglichkeiten.
@OF0 Für historische, längst verblichene Objekte gibt es in OSM weitgehend Konsens, dass sie nicht eingetragen werden. Wenn es "abgeleitete" Grenzen in Verwendung gibt, dann einfach diese eintragen. Genauso andere Dinge, die heute noch beobachtbar sind (z.B. gibt es in Baden mehr katholische Kirchen, in Württemberg mehr evangelische).

Baden habe ich nicht gelöscht, das können die Badenser selbst tun. Hohenzollern habe ich dagegen mit entsorgt, wollt ihr das auch wiederhaben?
OF0 (2018-01-29 12:53:06+00:00): Nakaner schrieb: [...] OSM ist ein Projekt für Daten der Gegenwart [...]

Wurde mit der Einführung der Lifecyclepräfixe nicht genau dieses Credo aufgegeben?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Insbesondere historic und removed meine ich damit.

[...] und nicht für historische Grenzen. [...]

Für abgerissene Gebäude, demontierte Bahnstrecken, geschossene Kneipen, ... aber auch nicht. Findet man trotzdem zu hauf. Das müsste dann ebenfalls alles, einschließlich des bereits erwähnten Limes, angegangen werden.
BAK365 (2018-01-29 13:56:13+00:00): Schade, dass ihr diese alten Grenzrelationen löscht - zumindest aus Schweizer Sicht. Wir haben noch gültige Staatsverträge mit unseren ehemaligen Nachbarn. Zum Beispiel diesen mit dem Grossherzogtum Baden (https://www.admin.ch/opc/de/classified-compilation/18540003/index.html). Von 1854, und noch immer in Kraft! Weitere finden sich hier https://www.admin.ch/opc/de/classified-compilation/0.13.html#0.132.
dieterdreist (2018-01-29 15:07:52+00:00): Die Staatsverträge sind gültig, weil es einen Rechtsnachfolger gibt.