piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-03-02 13:31:22+00:00): Duidelijk... 
Wanneer jullie echt serieus werk willen maken en foutloos willen mappen kun je het beste overschakelen naar editor JOSM.
Daat kun je als transparant de BGT omtrekgericht als achtergrond zetten. Daar zijn al die tafels en chicanes precies te zien. Ze zijn immers allemaal ingemeten
Zie:
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg

Succes,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2020-03-03 09:12:23+00:00): Dag Rudy,
Het commentaar bij de changeset is zo wel erg nietszeggend. Graag zo concreet mogelijk, dus in dit geval bijv "verkeersdrempel toegevoegd"
kimono japanese language center (2020-03-02 17:40:25+00:00): Kimono japanese language center
aceman444 (2020-03-02 19:28:10+00:00): Dobry den, aku nemocnicu ste tu pridali? Ziadnu plochu nevidim. A klastor je uz nefunkcny, len historicky? Z wiki stranky to jasne nie je a Vy zase neuvadzate ziadny zdroj.
Petr Fukátko (2020-03-03 09:18:37+00:00): Dobrý den.
Byly přidány tagy building=hospital k jednotlivým budovám nemocnice.
Ze stránek https://www.milosrdni.eu/ (a stejně je to uvedeno i na wiki) je zřejmé, že byl objekt původně klášterem. Jelikož je v místě dnes nemocnice, tak se historic=monastery zdá jako správná volba.
aceman444 (2021-05-13 21:12:02+00:00): Zdravim, a preco by malo byt pridane building=hospital, ked je to v budove byvaleho klastora? Teda budova stavebne nevyzera ako nemocnica. Ked nieco funguje ako nemocnica, este neznamena, ze je to aj stavebne nemocnica a ma tam byt building=hospital.
Mamutinka podobnych zmien porobila po Slovensku viacero a ocakavam, ze ich poopravujete.
aceman444 (2021-05-13 21:14:19+00:00): Okrem toho, preco by mal byt byvaly klastor zaznaceny bodom, ked uz bol znaceny na budove, co je presnejsie?
Nemocnica je znacena samostatnou plochou ako budova klastora, cize k ziadnemu konfliktu nedochadza.
Petr Fukátko (2021-05-20 06:25:22+00:00): Dobrý den.
Současné značení mi přijde víceméně správně. Situaci jsme řešili před rokem a co si vybavuji, tak to, že se zde nachází nemocnice, nebylo v mapě nijak značeno.
To, jestli by v tagu building mělo být hospital nebo monastery, je asi otázkou názoru. Mně přijde, že je lepší mít v tagu building současnou funkci budovy(tedy hospital) a v tagu historic mít uvedený původní funkci budovy(tedy monastery). Ale uznávám, že se na to někdo může dívat jinak.
Petr Fukátko (2021-05-20 06:28:10+00:00): Co se týče druhé poznámky, tak zde už nedokážu přesně zjistit, na co reagovat. Bod už v mapě není. Nemůžu než souhlasit, že plocha pro klášter je lepší než bod, pokud je nemocnice značená samostatnou plochou. Ale zpětně už posloupnost toho, jak změny v mapě vznikly, dohledat nedokážu.
Petr Fukátko (2021-05-20 06:31:34+00:00): Na změny uživatele Mamutinka co se týče nemocnic se podívám. Ale chtěl bych upozornit, že si stojíme za tím, že doplnit nemocnice tam, kde chybí, a to na základě veřejně dostupných zdrojů - například webových stránek samotných nemocnic - nepovažujeme za chybu. Je to podle nás hodnotný příspěvek do OSM.
RicoElectrico (2020-03-02 23:04:07+00:00): Witam, rozumiem że intencją było nadanie nazwy ulicy. Proszę być bardziej ostrożnym przy edycji, bo została zmieniona geometria kilku obiektów - między innymi jeden z budynków został zamieniony w koło nakładające się na inne budynki oraz teren oczyszczalni został przyciągnięty i przyklejony do drogi:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=81683300

Wycofałem tę edycję poza zmianą nazwy ulicy.

Edytor iD ma samouczek, naprawdę warto go przejść. 

W razie pytań zapraszam na polskie forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 13:19:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7254856153/history has access:motor_vehicle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using motor_vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well?
user_5359 (2020-03-02 19:27:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-03-03 10:52:36+00:00): Bom dia,

Já solicitei que comunique ao seu professor para contactar para nunocapelocaldeira@gmail.com há uma série de edições que não estão a cumprir com as regras da comunidade do OpenStreetMap. 
Esta edição foi removida, no OpenStreetMap não se elimina elementos, modifica-se. Você eliminou edificios que já estavam no OSM desde 2015 e voltou a criá-los na mesma edição. Por favor leia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history e peça ao seu professor para contactar para o meu email.

Cumprimentos,

Nuno Caldeira
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-02 23:33:08+00:00): Why did you delete the 11 storage tanks w484713031 and following? Visible in Bing which you cite, as well as in 
Agreeable they are not buildings, but that is not a reason to delete them.
 
Restored / tag adjusted / 12th added.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-02 23:33:55+00:00): ...as in Maxar.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-02 23:20:13+00:00): You added a nice wastewater plant that is visible only in Maxar, not yet in Bing or Esri. 
No problem with that, but you maliciously deleted a basin that is very visible in the Maxar image!

The rest of your changeset is an undiscussed mechanical edit for eroding established amenity tags, unplausible deletion of man_made=works, and adding unplausible landuse values to buildings.

Partially reverted, wastewater plant kept.
eggie (2020-03-02 16:21:05+00:00): Hi brbrb  You changed the official name into the webaddress name?  Why?
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-02 16:21:48+00:00): You are sure?
brbrbr_nl (2020-03-02 16:53:40+00:00): The camping itself uses the name with dashes.
eggie (2020-03-02 17:02:39+00:00): Okay..thanks for reply.. 
Gr eggie
gabro00 (2020-04-22 17:37:06+00:00): Szia!
A fixme=check house number azért került a házakra, mert ebben a formában invalid címek. A wiki szerint kellene eljárni, vagyis:
"Több bejáratú társasház esetén ha a címek különböznek, az egyes bejáratokat jelöljük entrance=main ponttal és a pontos címmel." - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Jel%C3%B6l%C3%A9si_p%C3%A9ld%C3%A1k
Spush (2020-04-22 19:00:24+00:00): Buildings with multiple house numbers
Separate the numbers by commas (e.g., 11,13,15) or semicolon (e.g., 11;13;15). Currently comma version is more popular. But the default separator for multiple values in OSM is the semi-colon. On the tagging@ mailing list it was proposed to use the default, as well.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
gabro00 (2020-05-13 09:35:54+00:00): Az elejét lehagytad: "There is currently no global consensus on this. Here are _some_ possibilities..."

Ha létezik magyar változat, akkor az az irányadó. Egyébként ez az egybe címezés azért se jó, mert ilyen hosszú házaknál (pl.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108393089) a két cím közt akár 100m is lehet.
Spush (2020-05-13 19:35:54+00:00): Ok. Értem. Kösz. Sorry.
rhtb0 (2022-10-29 13:55:44+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지합니다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할겁니다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있습니다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않습니다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있습니다.
Paul_012 (2020-03-28 23:51:44+00:00): This edit deleted most of the Chiang Mai - Lamphun border. I've reverted the mistake, but please be more careful next time. Also, I note that you mentioned Google in the changeset source. Unlike Bing, which has licensed their imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap, Google has no compatible licence and neither their imagery nor map may be used as a source.
user_10215874 (2020-06-20 14:07:16+00:00): I check the google map bussiness to check their province or  Municipality registry in the market place to see if they are in the Lamphun province or Chiang mai province and
user_10215874 (2020-06-20 14:07:35+00:00): ok
:I
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:36:08+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
rhtb0 (2022-10-29 13:55:38+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지합니다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할겁니다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있습니다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않습니다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있습니다.
rhtb0 (2022-10-29 13:55:32+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지합니다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할겁니다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있습니다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않습니다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있습니다.
DP24PH (2020-03-02 15:48:35+00:00): Note: This covers the following regions: NCR, CALABARZON, Bicol, Eastern Visayas, CARAGA, and Davao Regions. DLTBCo, JAC, Philtranco, MetroExpress P2P bus routes are hereby reviewed and enhanced.
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:36:15+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
RusFox (2020-03-02 22:08:20+00:00): Привет! Что это за правка такая? Зачем вы сломали дорогу? Если нечаянно, ремонтируйте все обратно :)
RusFox (2020-03-02 22:10:04+00:00): Очень рекомендую использовать вот эту программу для редактирования OSM https://josm.openstreetmap.de/
eggie (2020-03-02 16:16:53+00:00): Beste Kofmev.. het lijkt me geen goed idee om zulke zaken op de kaart van OSM uit te proberen. Overigens stond dit stukje weg foutief op highway=residential. 
Dat had de voorgaande mapper gedaan. Het is geen woonwijk... dus dat klopt ook niet. 
Ik heb het weer teruggezet naar de voorlaatste tagging highway=unclassified.
Het is nu weer goed getagd.
Het lijkt me zinloos om een klein stukje weg in een langer wegdeel op tertiary te zetten. 
De doorgaande route tertiary is de Schuttersweg. 
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. 
MVG,
Eggie
rhtb0 (2022-10-29 13:55:25+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지합니다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할겁니다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있습니다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않습니다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있습니다.
rhtb0 (2022-10-28 08:25:10+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지합니다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할겁니다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있습니다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않습니다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있습니다.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-24 20:45:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144421131 where the changeset comment is: Reverting allegedly Google-sourced changes prior to redaction.
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:36:22+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
ortho_is_hot (2020-03-03 00:34:20+00:00): G'day GIID,

Others have pointed out issues with your data contributions to the OSM project (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81463420 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81581902) and you have continued to add incorrect data to the project.

You do not need an individual market for each entrance, there are other tags you can use. Additionally you have introduced your own proprietary, unexplained tagging schemes that are not documented.

I, and others, are of the opinion that such changes should be reverted soon. If you wish to experiment with the OSM data stack then there are other software solutions that you can use rather than compromising the map for other users.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot
aharvey (2020-03-04 04:06:57+00:00): I've removed the marketplace tag from each of these nodes and converted them to ref=.
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:36:31+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
eggie (2020-03-02 16:26:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het kadaster en precies ingemeten. Het is beter om daar niets aan te veranderen en gebouwen in gebouwen te gaan tekenen. 
Adressen en gebouw-updates kun je het beste doorzetten via een verzoek op het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-02 16:34:56+00:00): In de BAG data is er nog niets over te vinden. Je zou dus een terugmelding kunnen doen naar het Kadaster via deze site. .. zodat het in de administratie van de BAG verwerkt kan worden.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=gruttershof%2032&resultOffset=0&objectId=0344200000013630&geometry.x=136475.69260034&geometry.y=456566.31116164&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0344010000015855

Doe je dat zelf? 
De import is altijd éénrichting BAG>> OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-02 16:49:19+00:00): Wellicht kunnen de Bagimporteurs even kijken?
 https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=779194#p779194
Mediot Rijbewijskeuringen (2020-03-02 17:32:17+00:00): Hoi Eggie, 
Even voor de duidelijkheid, zijn alle bovenstaande berichten voor mij bedoeld? Ik had net al even reactie naar je gestuurd via berichten. Excuus dat ik over de bestaande bebouwing heen heb getekend. Wist wel dat t niet direct doorgevoerd zou worden en dat ik reactie zou krijgen. Mijn vraag is dan ook, hoe dan wel? Er is wel meer niet helemaal correct op de kaart. Maar dat heb je mij bij deze uitgelegd. Ik zal het via het kadaster aangeven.

Groeten Stijn
eggie (2020-03-02 19:11:58+00:00): Stijn,
PB net verzonden naar je.
Het BAG team heeft net iets aangepast. Je moet maar eens kijken.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=779221#p779221

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-02 19:14:57+00:00): Het is aangepast naar kadaster data.
Je kunt de geïmporteerde adresnodes die allemaal links liggen naar de goede plek slepen.
Het Kadaster ziet het als één pand, maar dat geldt voor appartementen ook. 
Op gebouwen zelf staan nooit adressenn. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=81694001
eggie (2020-03-02 19:18:40+00:00): Wanneer de naam moet renderen dan nog een tag toevoegen. Zit hier daadwerkelijk een arts dan amenity=doctors  Is het alleen een kantoor dan office=yes. Je zult zien dat de naam dan zichtbaar wordt.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-03-02 19:19:20+00:00): aanvulling. Die info combineer je dan met adresnode 34?
eggie (2020-03-02 19:41:33+00:00): Adresnodes verplaatst
eggie (2020-03-02 19:45:30+00:00): office=yes toegevoegd..
Mediot Rijbewijskeuringen (2020-03-03 21:29:25+00:00): Ik ga die info proberen te combineren met node 34. Zit daadwerkelijk een arts, maar ontvangt geen curatief bezoek. Dus mensen kunnen niet komen aanlopen, dus waarom geen doctor dan? ;-)

Wat vreemd blijft. De overkant heeft wel weliswaar slorige  opdeling in apartementen. Dan zou dit 1 geheel moeten zijn toch? De nummers moeten ook aan de ingang staan met zn allen en dus niet op de ruimte zelf? 

Afgezien van de bebouwing mag ik verder wel dingen als een zomers druk bezochte aanlegsteiger aangeven?
Mediot Rijbewijskeuringen (2020-03-03 21:32:29+00:00): Als het goed stond ie al aan 34 gekoppeld
eggie (2020-03-03 21:54:51+00:00): Klopt.... Dat had ik al eerder gedaan. 
Je kunt office=yes vervangen door amenity=doctors Dat geeft een dokterssymbool. 
Succes,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-03 21:56:18+00:00): De adresnodes kun je gewoon verplaatsen. Het Kadaster gooit die soms allemaal op een hoopje en dan is het een hele uitzoekerij.
ToniE (2020-03-02 16:25:05+00:00): Halo baconian,

der Name war nicht verloren gegangen, sondern absichtlich vom landuse=resitential gelöscht worden.

Es ist üblich, Ortsnamen an sogenannte Place-Nodes zu mappen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/893264089), nicht an (irgendwelche) landuse.

Die landuse stimmen zudem in der Regel nicht mit den Gemeindegrenzen überein (admin_boundary, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/935150).

Viele Grüße
Toni
baconian (2020-03-02 16:31:56+00:00): Hallo Toni, Danke für die Erklärung! Es gibt aber keinen Knoten für "Reuth", oder habe ich es übersehen?
ToniE (2020-03-02 16:34:12+00:00): Sichtbar u.U. nicht in jeder Zoomstufe, aber der ist hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/893264089
baconian (2020-03-02 16:38:22+00:00): stimmt!
Danke. Habe den Namen wieder entfernt.
tux67 (2020-03-03 10:54:33+00:00): Hi nochmal.
gleiche Kommentare wie bei changeset 81676486. Zusätzlich war hier der Weg auf dem Tankstellengelände mit layer=-1 in den Untergrund verlegt. Mit einem layer=1 am roof und covered=yes für den Weg unter dem Dach ist das nicht notwendig.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81689341
vanagaudi (2020-03-03 11:52:30+00:00): Ja, aufgrund dessen, dass ich den Weg unter dem Dach mit "tunnel=building_passage" gekennzeichnet habe, wird im iD der Layer -1 für den Weg vorgeschrieben. Ich denke, dass iD hier ein generelles Problem hat, denn auch bei Gebäudedurchfahrten sollte der Gebäude- und der Wegelayer die gleiche Ebene besitzen.
Aus den Wikis bin ich nicht ganz schlau geworden, aber den Vorschlag, Roof mit "layer=1" und den Weg darunter mit "covered=yes" zu beaufschlagen, halte ich für gut. Da werde ich meine Prozedur entsprechend abändern.
Vielen Dank nochmal für die Hinweise.
Helmut
tux67 (2020-03-03 13:30:55+00:00): Gerne ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81689341
Adam Franco (2020-03-05 19:08:54+00:00): Hi @eaboyce, thanks for editing OpenStreetMap and welcome to the community of editors!

I haven't been to this site and the satellite imagery doesn't show this road yet, but if Gin Lane is primarily an access road to the distillery, then it should be categorized as a "Service" road, likely with type "driveway". Due to historical reasons in the British road network, the "Unclassified" road level is actually for roads that are *more* important than residential. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Roads for details.

Let me know if you have any further questions and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81689600
aceman444 (2020-03-02 19:23:43+00:00): Zdravim, podla coho ste zmenili budovu na building=hospital. Odkial viete, ze je konstrukcne postavena ako nemocnica? To ze je na pozemku/areali nemocnice nic neznamena.
Petr Fukátko (2020-03-03 09:00:59+00:00): Dobrý den. V budově sídlí Kardiologie. Viz. stránky nemocnice. Dle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhospital je toto tagování správné, konstrukční původ budovy není relevantní.
jmapb (2020-03-02 19:28:05+00:00): Hi Laida42, thanks for adding this. Does Chilis on Wheels serve ready-to-eat meals, or is it more of a way to get free packaged food?

If the main thing is free meals, it's probably better to tag it social_facility=soup_kitchen rather than social_facility=food_bank.

J
Tefexus (2020-03-12 16:12:45+00:00): In meinen Augen ist diese Fläche  kein Park. Hier stehen lediglich ein paar einzelne Bäume auf einer gepflasterten Fläche.

"Ein Park ist eine meist städtische, öffentliche Grünfläche, die zur Erholung dient, z.B. Stadtpark, Kurpark. Die Park-Landschaft ist üblicherweise gestaltet und bietet oft einen Wechsel von offenen Rasenflächen, Baumgruppen, Sträuchern, Spiel- und Sportflächen. "
Enock4seth (2023-05-11 11:42:12+00:00): this is some years ago but mapping every tiny path as a residential road from afar is completely useless and doesn't help anyone. kindly avoid this types of mapping if you don't know.
cagefreecowboy (2023-05-11 15:13:12+00:00): thanks for the feedback, it's very helpful. i apologize in advance for having made similar edits to other areas.
ma-rt-in (2020-03-03 09:58:06+00:00): Hallo,
bitte bei start_date dieses Format verwenden: YYYY-MM-DD
vg
marc__marc (2020-03-09 16:55:54+00:00): pour l'utilisation possible sans carte c'est authentication:app
par contre, chargemap n'autorise pas à de copier ses données, point 4 https://fr.chargemap.com/about/cgu
il faut par conséquent retirer les 2 infos venant d'eux si elles ne sont pas disponible sur le site web.
d'ailleurs le site web doit etre celui de la borne, pas un site web générique de toutes les bornes d'un réseau
Cordialement,
Marc
!bm (2020-03-02 23:18:24+00:00): Hallo janolezab!
Da ist ja auch addr:inclusion=potential dran. In den öffentlichen Daten (Geoportal Berlin / Berlin Adressen) wird sie jedenfalls geführt. Praktisch, Parkplatz mit eigener Adresse.
--besteGrüße!bm
trigpoint (2020-03-02 19:43:46+00:00): Hi Brian
Mapping farmland as large multipolygons makes future detail mapping of farmland, such as tagging as arable, pasture or meadow, or adding boundaries much harder for other mappers.

This subject was discussed on talk-gb last December and the consensus was that farmland is better mapped as individual fields. Several mappers having come to that conclusion independently.

The thread is at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2019-December/023889.html

Cheers Phil
brianboru (2020-03-04 10:32:24+00:00): Hi Phil

Happy to help you in overcoming any difficulties with multipolygons in Herefordshire as and when you want to map individual fields

Regards

Brian
kapazao (2020-03-02 22:56:49+00:00): Hola, ¿por qué creas la calle de nuevo encima de la ya existente?
Con haberla editado era suficiente. Es correcto que es Calle Séneca, pero lo has hecho mal creándola encima de la que ya había, por lo que hay 2 calles en el mismo lugar.
Ya lo he arreglado yo, no hay problema.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81700803
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81691800
mikkolukas (2020-03-20 22:47:19+00:00): The railroad did never cross over the rod.
The road is crossing over the railroad.

The structure seen on aerial photos, was the foundation (bottom) of the bridge.
Aleksa M (2020-03-02 22:02:02+00:00): #vandalism #editwar
Jordi MF (2020-03-05 00:17:59+00:00): Hola,

Gracias por intentar mejorar los datos de OSM. Sin embargo, desde la comunidad española de OSM, hemos visto que has mapeado algunas zonas como parques que no lo son según los criterios de la wiki de OpenStreetMap. Por favor, lea la wiki y, si tiene alguna duda, consulte con la comunidad a través del canal de Telegram o de la lista "Talk-es".

Muchas gracias y buen mapeo.

Jordi