piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
KévinS_ (2016-07-11 20:58:40+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je n'ai pas vu le nom indiqué sur place (je ne suis passé que très rapidement...), mais le voisinage semble désigner ce coin de verdure par ce nom-là.
Comme l'indiquent mes précédents changesets, je ne suis pas de la région, je n'ai malheureusement pas l'occasion de vérifier sur place, je repars demain. 
Cdt.
KévinS_ (2016-07-11 21:02:28+00:00): Complément : http://www.villerslesnancy.fr/fr/promenade-de-la-coulee-verte.html
Rom1 (2016-07-11 21:11:09+00:00): C'est effectivement le nom d'une promenade mais a priori pas le parc lui-même. Cela restera à confirmer... Merci.
Minh Nguyen (2016-12-01 20:27:11+00:00): This changeset replaced the Vietnamese name of this museum an the Italian translation. I fixed the issue in changeset 44096307.
Hjart (2017-07-10 23:52:36+00:00): Why do you want to tag it as stream only?
user_5359 (2016-07-11 19:02:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
ScratchBeat (2016-07-11 19:07:58+00:00): Thank you. I'm fairly new to the map system, slowly learning.
user_5359 (2016-07-11 19:09:16+00:00): No problem! If you any problem: You are welcome.
aceman444 (2016-07-12 18:09:22+00:00): Hi, are you sure the bus stop name contains the number 27 OR the bus stop is placed correctly? The address of Komenskeho 27 is more to the north of this position, above the junction of Komenskeho and 1.maja.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-23 21:12:36+00:00): Hello,
About a month ago on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40230192 I suggested that you really shouldn't make up names for footpaths just show they appear on map renderings such as OSM's standard map as part of a long distance footpath.  If a path is part of a long distance route, those maps that choose to show those will show it - please don't make up footpath names to make it show up elsewhere too.
Also, you've added an extra bridge here.  My recollection is that there is only one bridge at Hampton Court Bridge - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4864117 - and that currently has "sidewalk=both" and has the Thames Path long distance path running along it.
Has someone really built a second parallel bridge here?
Cheers,
Andy
letihu (2016-11-05 21:11:25+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4296236591/history
hat die defekte wheelmap app einen Fehler gemacht.
slodki (2016-08-13 17:47:33+00:00): Duplikaty w lokalizacji http://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=54.65534&lon=17.50037#map=17/54.65480/17.50449&layers=N
mavl (2016-07-11 17:29:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы изменили статусы дорог, но эти изменения не очень логичны. Статусы дорог должны меняться на перекрёстках или границах населённого пункта. Здесь же получилось, что статус trunk внезапно сменился на secondary. Сейчас статус secondary хорошо согласуется со статусами остальных дорог Тюмени.  
  
Когда этот участок станет частью восточного объезда, мы обязательно обозначим его как trunk. Поэтому предлагаю немного подождать со сменой статуса.  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
pesec (2016-07-12 03:55:00+00:00): Основное назначение правки было не в статусе дороги, а в ограничении скорости на ней. Участок находится вне населенного пункта как раз до съездов на этой развязке, однако навигатор ругается на превышение.
Что касается нагруженности и значимости, то основной поток грузового транспорта двигается по ней на ул.Домостроителей и далее.
mavl (2016-07-12 04:04:26+00:00): Ограничения скорости, которые вы добавили, остались. Мы вчера обсудили статус этой дороги с RSergei. Пока решили оставить как secondary. Вести trunk на Домостроителей и далее в город нет смысла.
Piskvor (2016-07-11 13:34:45+00:00): Ahoj,
ty edity v Praze jsou úmyslně, jen ve stejném changesetu spolu s HR? :)
(nic ve zlým: jen se mi občas takhle podařilo smísit něco, co jsem chtěl uploadnout, s ještě rozpracovaným editem úplně jinde - vyskočil mi tenhle edit v lokalitě "Praha" s názvem "Novalja", tak mě to zaujalo)
Měj se,
HPM
gorn (2016-07-12 03:45:47+00:00): To je pochopitelne chyba, vznikla amendnutim editu ktery jsem delal predtim. Hadej kde jsme byli na dovolene. No moc nevim jak to resit a neneapachat jeste vic skody ...
Piskvor (2016-07-12 09:28:11+00:00): No, pokud ta chyba spočívá jen ve dvou různých editech v jednom changesetu, tak se vlastně nic neděje - leda by to někdo chtěl revertovat en bloc.
iWowik (2017-05-25 16:42:47+00:00): Что-то у вас с кодировочкой в name пошло не так.
Поправьте
chnav (2017-05-25 17:08:32+00:00): Вернул name в оригинальное поле импорта (не моего), оставил name:en
freebeer (2018-06-10 18:32:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59718943 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam
frosm (2019-06-03 11:20:44+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4296327391
qu'est ce que c'est exactement ?
une sale communautaire qu'on peux louer, un peu dans le genre de la salle des fêtes ?
cela n'est visiblement pas une statue
emvee (2017-04-15 10:09:20+00:00): Hi Thoschi,

Thanks for your Ergänzungen Muttental but I noticed it likely broke quite some bicycle and Wanderweg relations.

I fixed some relations but some are still problematic, for example the Energiewirtschaftlicher Wanderweg, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3095572 and the Radverkehrsnetz NRW, Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2073184 over the Mühlenstraße

If possible, could you have a look at these relations?

Thanks,

Martin.
manoharuss (2016-07-12 08:12:46+00:00): Hi pohaham,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. But clearly the airport does not have these many doctors. This is a public map database you are uploading to and people who use OSM would see these unusable mistagged POI's. I am not sure what you were trying to tag. If these Points of interest are right but you tagged them wrong, it would be great if you can correct these yourself. If this is a mistake, I will revert these changes for you.

Best,
Manohar
ChangwooRyu (2020-05-09 20:31:47+00:00): They look like power switches(개폐기) or power substations rather than doctors.
Zverik (2016-07-12 16:02:54+00:00): Hi! Thanks for fixing the borders. You've broken a few coastline in the process. Please be more careful next time and pay attention to JOSM validation warnings.
de vries (2016-07-12 18:27:31+00:00): Sorry for that, did you fix it? if not can you point me to the problem? 
Thanks for noticing.
Zverik (2016-07-12 22:34:26+00:00): I've fixed coastline issues, so no worries. Not sure about the borders though.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-11 16:02:33+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Has the name of the bus stops here such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/502505060 really changed their name to "Bus Stop"?  It seems a very unlikely name to me.
I'd expect that the name would still be "Railway Station" because that's the location of the bus stop.
Please do be aware that any edits that you make through MAPS.ME are visible by everyone, not just you.
Best Regards,
Andy
Владимир К (2016-08-23 07:32:54+00:00): не понятно, а зачем это именовать? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242180193
Constable (2016-07-11 15:34:59+00:00): Termoveneta è seriamente il nome del benzinaio?
DavideAndreetta (2016-07-11 15:49:22+00:00): si
Constable (2016-07-11 15:57:11+00:00): ok, grazie
dieterdreist (2016-07-18 09:57:44+00:00): in this changeset there are 2 attractions mapped as 2 distinct playgrounds, better use one playground and add 2 attractions, see the wiki for details
mavl (2016-07-11 17:13:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавили на эту дорогу [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345924994] теги:  
access=no (доступ всем запрещён)  
foot=yes (пешеходам доступ разрешён)  
  
Это явное противоречие. Что вы имеете в виду?  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
Aviator24 (2016-07-12 11:03:43+00:00): Проезд для транспорта перекрыт!
mavl (2016-07-12 11:07:58+00:00): Тогда нужно обозначать, что доступ запрещён автомобилям, а не всем:  
vehicle=no  
foot=yes
Math1985 (2016-07-11 14:13:08+00:00): Bedankt, dat ziet er een stuk beter uit!
Supaplex (2016-07-16 03:50:04+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
pnorman_mechanical (2016-07-17 10:11:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40794881 where the changeset comment is: Restore paths, see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/50845/in-ontario-canada-are-forest-access-roads-that-are-use-at-your-own-risk-wanted-in-osm?
changchun_1 (2016-07-17 05:24:57+00:00): Puh was ist das denn, Wege total verschoben. Wege korrigiert mit Änderunssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40787340.
pnorman_mechanical (2016-07-17 10:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40794962 where the changeset comment is: Restore paths, see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/50845/in-ontario-canada-are-forest-access-roads-that-are-use-at-your-own-risk-wanted-in-osm?
pnorman_mechanical (2016-07-17 10:19:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40795025 where the changeset comment is: Restore paths, see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/50845/in-ontario-canada-are-forest-access-roads-that-are-use-at-your-own-risk-wanted-in-osm?
robinottawa (2016-07-11 21:08:40+00:00): You deleted forest access roads with a note saying "not public". I thought they were public. How do you/OSM define public?
pnorman (2016-07-17 09:48:36+00:00): If a path isn't accessible to the public it should still be mapped and not deleted. Access can be indicated with the access=no tag
pnorman_mechanical (2016-07-17 10:28:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40795140 where the changeset comment is: Restore paths, see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/50845/in-ontario-canada-are-forest-access-roads-that-are-use-at-your-own-risk-wanted-in-osm?
pnorman_mechanical (2016-07-17 10:22:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40795099 where the changeset comment is: Restore paths, see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/50845/in-ontario-canada-are-forest-access-roads-that-are-use-at-your-own-risk-wanted-in-osm?
SomeoneElse (2016-07-11 22:25:41+00:00): Hello,
You've deleted a road here as "not public".  If the road actually exists in some form, please don't do this.  Instead, use appropriate access tags that explain who's allowed to use it and when.
If you've got any questions please don't hesitate to ask!
Cheers,
Andy
pnorman_mechanical (2016-07-17 10:28:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40795247 where the changeset comment is: Restore paths, see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/50845/in-ontario-canada-are-forest-access-roads-that-are-use-at-your-own-risk-wanted-in-osm?
manoharuss (2016-09-05 06:14:18+00:00): Hi msyam,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping efforts are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that you have added numbers to POIs names. The name tag is to specify the name of the business or establishment, not numbers. It would be great if you can fix this or I would have to revert your changeset completely.

Best,
Manohar
SomeoneElse (2016-11-25 17:10:12+00:00): Hi Manohar,
Any thoughts about this one?
The names are clearly implausible, but it'd be great to try and find out what the user's trying to record here.
Best Regards,
Andy
manoharuss (2016-12-01 07:59:21+00:00): @SomeoneElse Thanks for your comment. Apologies for my late reply. I opened a ticket in Mapbox mapping repository to track cleanup of the user edits (https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/251) and put together a gist noting down my observations (https://gist.github.com/manoharuss/3491a33c1b163dc201a5962c26747fb3) for your reference. Would be great if you can take a look.

Best,

Manohar
SomeoneElse (2016-12-01 10:32:25+00:00): @manoharuss It looks like there's been no attempt to contact the mapper for 5 months?
Some of the edits seem plausible (the name of the petrol station here for example) some less so (the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4498784392 doesn't sound like a bank) so if no contact can be made a revert of implausible data would make sense - but try and contact them first.
manoharuss (2016-12-20 06:18:45+00:00): @SomeoneElse left a personal message to the mapper to encourage participation in this changeset discussion(https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/251#issuecomment-268164570). Have not received a reply yet. What do you suggest on next actions?
SomeoneElse (2016-12-23 20:21:18+00:00): The usual stuff to try now would be to try and find a local mapper forum, or even just a local mapper, and consider an Arabic translation of any message.  If that fails, I'd just revert it - on the balance of probability they're just personal markers.
Cheers,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-01-09 21:09:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45037169 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some numbered objects in Gaza (suspected personal notes).  All attempts to contact the mapper have failed.
manoharuss (2017-01-10 05:28:17+00:00): @SomeoneElse Thanks for cleaning this up
FTA (2016-07-18 03:52:36+00:00): HI there, I noticed you changed the name on the Falkland Islands relation. My understanding is that the predominant language spoken there is English. Was this change made in consultation with the local mapping community? Alternative language names are already included in those localized tags, in this case namely name:es.
Best, Ethan aka FTA with the Data Working Group

Hola, ha cambiado el nombre de las "Faulkland Islands". Mi entendimiento es que el idioma predominante hay Inglés. ¿Se consultó a la comunidad local en primer lugar? Nombres de los idiomas alternativos ya están incluidos.
Saludos, Ethan a/k/a FTA con el Grupo de Trabajo de Datos
manoharuss (2016-07-12 07:12:45+00:00): Hi kailashdhirwani,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I appreciate your mapping efforts. But you have added tourism=attraction, tourism=artwork tags to many amenities. I suggest you that when you are in doubt or didn't find the exact tag in the app, don't tag it as anything else. Check this out for exact tag for each amenity. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features

Let me know if you need any other help.
Best,
Manohar
kailashdhirwani (2016-07-12 11:25:27+00:00): dear

i corrected all amenities  later on  web.
please check it
manoharuss (2016-07-12 12:30:36+00:00): Hi kailashdhirwani,
I appreciate your reply. I have seen that still there are few nodes with `tourism=*` tags for many nodes. I appreciate your effort in adding POI's. Please take some time to look into the nodes you have created.

Best,
Manohar
kailashdhirwani (2016-07-12 12:41:11+00:00): Dear Manohar 
i agree with you i will defiantly change it  

i am using Maps.me app  it has limited poi tags.so that please allow me some time. i personally aware  about all poi.

please give some time.

Regards

Kailash
kailashdhirwani (2016-07-12 13:16:18+00:00): hi Manohar 

now all nodes are  updated with real and accurate names.

but if you find some error inform me

some are still with tourism tag. it are informative for tourist 
thanks


kailash
manoharuss (2016-07-12 13:23:50+00:00): Hi kailashdhirwani,

Great job updating your the POI's. Awesome mapping. Now the POI's you just created will be of use to another OSM user. Good job. Please continue mapping on OSM. If you need any help in mapping or seeking to learn more, I am always here to help. Make sure that your edits are tagged according to the OSM Wiki and update them as they change for better OSM user experience.

Best,
Manohar
kailashdhirwani (2016-07-16 04:51:18+00:00): halo , manohar
i am updating lots of poi(as i think) so please correct me if you find some wrong thing in it as a tourissam ,attraction...which i didnt corrected.. if possible.. please help me

i normaly correct all poi but if by mistake some of them will left than pleace point it out.

thanks

Kailash
Vladimír Slávik (2016-07-14 13:49:15+00:00): buggy changeset - node appeared elsewhere
maraf24 (2016-07-11 20:50:08+00:00): Po tej drodze wolno tylno konno jeździć? Chyba nie ma takiego oznakowania w Polsce.
12334363543 (2016-07-12 10:51:11+00:00): Tu można popatzeć http://konnoobszaraminatury.pl/szlak-wzgorza-trzebnickie/ - to jest szlak konny Wzgórz Trzebnickich
maraf24 (2016-07-12 11:02:06+00:00): Szlaki wprowadzamy całkiem inaczej:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Relation:route
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhorse
user_5359 (2016-07-11 19:12:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the streets next time.
highflyer74 (2016-07-12 12:54:51+00:00): Hallo Mark!

Bitte denke daran, möglichst keinen key mit "_" neu zu erstellen. Diese Keys werden nicht ausgewertet und sind somit kaum nutzbar. Meines Wissens nach sollte man verzugsweise key=value1;value2 etc. nutzen. Also die Werte durch ";" trennen. Auch ist wichtig, Keys und Values nur klein zu schreiben.

Auch wäre hier ggf. shop=tailor zusätzlich zum craft sinnvoll (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtailor)

Danke!
Peer van Daalen (2016-07-15 09:18:06+00:00): Der zwischen der Auto-Fahrbahn der Lütticher Straße und dem eigentlichen ausgewiesenen Fußweg (auf dem Radler ausgewiesener Weise fahren dürfen) befindliche Trampelpfad aus gestampften Sand zwischen den beiden Baumreihen aus der Zeit der französischen Besatzung unter Napoleon (1794 bis 1814 ), ist weitestgehend nicht mehr für Räder befahrbar. 
- 
Dieser sogenannte "napoleonische Sommerpfad" wird trotz Holzpöller und verwilderten Baumbestand als Parkfläche und Hundeklo genutzt und in Bälde bei Phase 2 der Umbaumaßnahmen auf der Lütticher Straße in Gänze verschwinden. 

http://tanoscederquist-lounge.blogspot.de/2014/11/die-lutticher-strae-5-teil-die.html
SomeoneElse (2016-07-11 20:49:31+00:00): Thanks for that - I went looking for this today to correct the tagging but taginfo couldn't find it!
naoliv (2016-07-11 17:18:51+00:00): Alexandre, geralmente não se utiliza nomes genéricos ou descritivos no mapa.
Por exemplo, se a viela não possui nome, basta deixar o campo em branco.
alexandresilva (2016-07-16 06:21:12+00:00): Obrigado por me falar. estou iniciando no openstreetmap ainda preciso pegar o jeito
valeu
naoliv (2016-07-16 10:51:32+00:00): Se você tiver interesse, dúvida ou alguma outra coisa, pode participar da comunidade através de lista de discussão, fórum, grupo no telegram, etc: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
letihu (2016-07-31 22:07:53+00:00): Die Gebäude sollte schon miteinander verbunden sein.
vramirez122000 (2016-07-13 04:26:54+00:00): Felicidades! Te graduaste a JOSM. Ahora tu productividad aumentará exponencialmente
SomeoneElse (2016-07-15 00:58:16+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
manoharuss (2016-07-14 06:05:59+00:00): Hi msyam,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You have given alphanumeric names to banks, attractions and sport shops. The number of attractions, banks and sport shops seem unreasonable. I would like to the reason behind this. This is a public map database and your POI's are visible to all OSM users. please reply.

Best,

Manohar
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-01-09 21:09:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45037169 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some numbered objects in Gaza (suspected personal notes).  All attempts to contact the mapper have failed.
streinger (2016-07-12 07:04:15+00:00): зачем же тег для грунтовок удалять, не все же хотят по ним ездить, в программах для навигации даже пункт есть- избегать грунтовок, а без него программа ничего не знает о типе покрытия. Если там асфальт положили или еще что-то, то нужно поставить другой, но не удалять же.
Shepot (2016-07-13 17:41:22+00:00): Удалил тег изза некорректного отображения улиц в программе ситигид (улицу както странно показывает и перестает прокладывать по ним маршрут!) Че за хрень незнаю видимо косяк в проге.
streinger (2016-07-14 10:57:26+00:00):  Osm то тут причем? Данный тег есть и наоборот удобен, у меня тоже улицы с тегом для грунтовок отображаются по другому и сразу на экране видно что там нет твердого покрытия и если есть возможность то лучше   объехать. По поводу что по ней маршрут не прокладывает нужно попробовать не на само здание метку поставить, а рядом со зданием на саму улицу и нажать проложить,   или  в настройках попробовать отключить пункт избегать грунтовок( если такой есть). На проекте рисуют для всех, а не под конкретную программу,  т.е. если у кого- то  что-то не работает нужно писать разработчику программы и у него спрашивать почему не прокладывает.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-13 12:36:14+00:00): Thanks.  I've also rejoined http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106343718/history to the cycleway again (it had become disconnected).  I presume the new access road to the car park is actually open now.  Have you been here recently?
arenevier (2017-03-06 03:47:08+00:00): There is no safeway here. There use to be a small grocery store, but it got destroyed.
pyram (2016-07-17 20:39:00+00:00): Bitte keine Postleitzahlen/Adressbestandteile an Straßen ergänzen. WIr haben in D flächendeckende PLZ-Gebiete, so dass es überflüssig ist, diese Information an anderen Objekten zu ergänzen - insbesondere an solchen, die keine postalische Adresse haben.
opendcc (2016-07-11 19:46:49+00:00): Hallo,

da wurde versehentlich die Stromleitung beschädigt - habs wieder repariert. Mit Strg-Z kann man was rückgängig machen.

Servus
FraSchaDa (2016-07-12 16:10:39+00:00): Sorry, soll/darf nicht passieren.
habe leider nicht gesehen dass ich da was verschoben hatte.
Franz
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-01-09 21:09:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45037169 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some numbered objects in Gaza (suspected personal notes).  All attempts to contact the mapper have failed.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-14 23:21:00+00:00): Acredito que a tag aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4296891785 deveria ser https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmilestone
AjBelnuovo (2022-07-14 23:28:21+00:00): Acho que na época não existia esta tag ou foi um erro mesmo . Corrigido
maxerickson (2016-09-25 03:43:22+00:00): The VA (The Department of Veterans Affairs since 1989, no longer the Veterans Administration) is separate from the DoD and cabinet level. Based on that, is the military landuse appropriate?
ElliottPlack (2016-09-25 20:28:01+00:00): Max, that is a great point. I think the area was already miltiary, so I left it that way. The facility is actually closed now, so even a hospital tag is not really appropriate. The roads in there are all private access, so I suppose we could just change the access restrictions to private, and then remove the military landuse tag. Optionally, we could replace it with brownfield.
maxerickson (2016-09-27 17:28:05+00:00): Yeah, I came across the site reviewing hospitals with no emergency tag and removed the amenity tag from the node after checking a bit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358244014

I think brownfield makes a lot more sense than military.
opendcc (2016-07-11 19:52:03+00:00): Hallo,

wenn sich ein Wasserweg und eine Straße kreuzen, dann braucht es entweder Brücke oder Rohr (culvert).

Servus Wolfgang
FraSchaDa (2016-07-12 16:08:54+00:00): danke für den Hinweis,
sollte jetzt passend sein.
Franz
trigpoint (2016-07-12 12:00:56+00:00): Hi Stan
Welcome to OSM, thank you for your additions around Leicester.
One small comment, I am guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430410552#map=19/52.61114/-1.15923 should connect to Harefield Avenue at its northern end? This is required to provide connectivity so that routers can direct you along the path.
Cheers Phil