piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jgon6 (2018-03-01 18:38:09+00:00): By the way, you have tagged this node it looks like this is a house you used to live in. The tagging you used is not appropriate for a house. Houses should generally not have a name tag, and a house is very much not an industrial location. A better way to map this would be to trace the outline of the house and use tags that actually describe the location.

Some tags that would probably be right might include:

building=house
addr:housenumber=***
addr:street=*********
addr:zip=*****

And of course, change the star symbols with appropriate values.

Anothger thing I see is that you re-used the same changeset message on a couple different changesets, it helps other mappers know what you have done when you use a new descriptive comment each time.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56761021
user_5359 (2018-03-01 07:24:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street and house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
jgon6 (2018-03-01 18:40:49+00:00): Are you sure that this is where a marathon is located? I know there is a gas station up a block, but I'm not super familiar with this part of town, so I don't know what brand it is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56761153
jgon6 (2018-03-01 18:47:32+00:00): In this changeset, you added an area tagged place=neighbourhood. This is good, but you gave it a name that only applies to you, a name tag needs to be the actual name of something. If this is actually a neighborhood here, then it should be tagged with the right name. Also the outline could use some work as well. if the neighborhood doesn't have a distinct boundary it can be added as a node in the center of it. If any of this doesn't make sense, or you aren't sure how to fix this you can respond to this comment and I'll try to help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56761239
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 11:35:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324843520/history has r=Finland key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
dremdau (2024-02-20 12:37:47+00:00): Looks like it's a mistyped ref=* tag mixed with the value of is_in=* tag. It's not needed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 18:03:00+00:00): I will remove it then
user_5359 (2018-02-28 17:25:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I didn't just revert your changeset because of technical errors. A route is not drawn as a new element, but is a collection of existing path (segments) and points in an OSM object of type relation. An example is a busline as a relation. But for a one-time event, we do not accept this information. However, this information can still be displayed on an OSM map, in which this track is shown as additional information on the map.
user_5359 (2018-02-28 17:14:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
johnny_1982 (2018-02-28 23:17:09+00:00): Hallo Assai,
willkommen bei OSM. Hier ein paar Anmerkungen zu deinen Arbeiten in Braunschweig.
1.) In diesem Changeset veränderst du unter anderem diesen Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565098330
Du änderst die Eigenschaft "lit"  von dem Wert "yes" auf den neuen Wert "lit=yes". Sicherlich ein Bedienfehler. Wenn du im Editor auf "lit" klickst kommst du zum Wiki. Hier sind die gültigen/sinnvollen Werte aufgelistet. 
2.) Bei neuen Wegen fügst du die Eigenschaft level=0 hinzu, beispielsweise hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565103750
Das ist unnötig. Schau dir bitte die Erläuterung für level an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:level?uselang=de
Ggf. meinst du layer statt level. Dies ist aber auch nur dann nötig, wenn Wege übereinander liegen (Brücken, Tunnel, etc.)
GerdP (2018-10-16 08:12:40+00:00): Hi! I wonder if highway=underwater_way
could be replaced by abandoned:highway=track
or destroyed:highway=track?
jgon6 (2018-03-01 18:54:55+00:00): Bparnin, Thank you for added this bank to the map. I see you are new here, so I want you to know it looks good. I see your boulding outline is a little skewed, to fix this there is a function in the editor that will let you make an area "square". This will make all the corners of the building be nice 90 degree angles. All you need to do is right click on the outline, and you will get a menu, choose the icon that looks like a square. That will make you boulding look a lot better.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56761598
user_5359 (2018-02-28 17:11:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
user_5359 (2018-02-28 19:15:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building! And be honest: The most of the residential building are "My House"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-10 15:14:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102703272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers in Saudi Arabia.
user_5359 (2019-12-07 09:11:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the difference between ATM=1 and atm=yes (the standard tag)?
PierZen (2018-03-04 16:43:55+00:00): Generic Imagery Source. To Specify the image used would facililitate monitoring by other contributors.
*Martin* (2018-03-01 08:18:55+00:00): Ahoj. Pri tejto zmene si poskodil budovu. Prosim oprav to.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56762693
sam96x (2018-03-01 09:54:05+00:00): Dobrý deň, smiem vedieť o ktorú budovu sa jedná? Ďakujem.
*Martin* (2018-03-01 09:59:22+00:00): V tom linku co som poslal to pekne vidno. Posunuli ste bod https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/872408450 budovy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73607902.
eggie (2018-02-28 22:11:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-02-28 22:24:43+00:00): Zo klopt het inderdaad beter.
Bij het nieuwste woonapartement aan de Campanula heb ik vorige week wat aangepast, maar het is nog lang niet actueel. Wellicht kun je daar al iets aanpassen.
FredrikLindseth (2018-02-28 18:01:48+00:00): This was suposed to be "Moved a path" and source "Strava heatmap and note88169"
user_5359 (2018-02-28 19:10:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a coastline and one node with only the name=House. Please have a look on the tagging of a building.
Nakaner (2018-03-01 21:46:09+00:00): Hallo JannissOfficial,

du hast um eine Sichtung gebeten. Hier ist mein Kommentar:

Auf Basis welcher Grundlage hast du die Nummer der B 6n geändert? Wann hast du die Strecke zuletzt befahren. Ich möchte dich um eine zeitnahe Antwort bitten. Andernfalls reihst du dich in die Galerie derer ein, die in die B6n-Falle getappt sind. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56764169
Nakaner (2018-03-01 21:56:59+00:00): Nachtrag: Bitte sieh von weiteren Änderungen an der B 6n ab, da ich all deine Änderungen an dieser Strecke voraussichtlich morgen wieder zurücksetzen werden, wie ich es schon einmal getan habe (es sei denn, du kannst belegen, dass deine Änderungen gerechtfertigt sind). https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51301060
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56764169
Nakaner (2018-03-02 16:37:14+00:00): Hallo JannisOfficial,

da du über die Diskussion im Forum den dortigen Thread gesehen hast, gehe ich davon aus, dass dir mittlerweile bekannt ist (wurde im Thread diskutiert), dass OSM der On-the-Ground-Regel folgt (zum Nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Dinge_so_kartieren.2C_wie_sie_in_der_Realit.C3.A4t_sind). Dein Verweis auf einen Wikipedia-Artikel trägt nichts zu Sache bei. Dort kann ich keinen neuen Informationen entnehmen.

Ich werde daher deine Änderungen vorerst zurücksetzen. Du bist eingeladen, dich im OSM-Forum zur Sache zur äußern.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:23:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
scratera (2018-03-01 06:05:54+00:00): al crm io io aggiungerei amenity=recycling e poi operator=Dolomiti Energia e  recycling_type=centre
ciao paolo
scratera (2018-03-01 05:42:53+00:00): la tettoia io la segnerei come building=roof 
ciao
eggie (2018-02-28 22:31:57+00:00): Dag PW Vermeer,. Vaak zijn (brom)fietsers uitgezonderd van eenrichting. Is dat ook hier het geval. Dan graag toevoegen
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:moped= no   (indien van toepassing)
Graag reactie
eggie (2018-03-02 14:38:25+00:00): Top!... bedankt voor je actie en reactie.
scratera (2018-03-01 18:48:17+00:00): una precisazione landuse=retail si usa per un'area di negozi...in questo caso io metterei piuttosto amenity=animal_shelter come da https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_shelter
ciao paolo
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
chnav (2018-03-03 06:41:30+00:00): Несмешно. Вы продемонстрировали всей стране что нашей карте доверять нельзя т.к. любой дебил может написать что угодно. http://m.ngs24.ru/news/more/53603441/
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
AlexanderF (2018-03-11 12:08:35+00:00): Hallo ENT8R,
hast Du Dir das vor der Änderung vor Ort angeschaut oder nur anhand einer Note geändert?
Ich glaube nämlich, dass die Änderung nicht korrekt ist.
ent8r (2018-03-11 14:42:37+00:00): Das habe ich anhand einer Notiz, die von einem StreetComplete-Nutzer erstellt wurde, geändert. Ich kann mich gerade nicht mehr daran erinnern, ob ich auch noch Mapillary zur Überprüfung genommen habe... Wohnst du zufällig hier in der Nähe und könntest das überprüfen?
Das wäre sehr nett. Viele Grüße, ENT8R
AlexanderF (2018-03-12 18:38:02+00:00): Ja, ich werde mir das mal in den nächsten Tagen etwas genauer anschauen.
ent8r (2018-03-12 19:42:33+00:00): Super. Dankeschön!
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
roptat (2018-03-01 13:21:36+00:00): Salut !

j'ai remarqué que tu mettais toujours les numéros de téléphone avec le +33 (bien !), mais que tu laissais le 0 devant le numéro. Le format international correct est +33 2 ..., sans le 0. Le numéro n'est pas accessible depuis l'étranger avec le 0. J'ai corrigé (il y a une analyse osmose pour ça :)), mais je signale pour que tu puisses rentrer la bonne valeur directement la prochaine fois. Merci pour ton travail !
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
5m4u9 (2018-02-28 21:06:30+00:00): hola, gracias por añadir los edificios y la sede social, mejoré la sede social para ser visibilizada como sede social
JJIglesias (2018-02-28 23:05:13+00:00): Saludos Gustavo
Si bien en las imagenes (por su baja precision) las edificaciones pueden verse distorsionadas (No es una vista totalmente vertical), en la vida real no lo son. y generalmente son bastante cuadradas o rectangulares, para evitar que salgan como "locas" las imagenes, lo que se hace es una vez dibujado la edificacion la marcas y aprietas el boton derecho de tu mouse y sale un desplegable con un cuadrito si lo aprietas la edificacion se pondra con angulos rectos que es como esta en la vida real, tambien puedes apretar la S y sucedera lo mismo.
Gracias 
JJ
nyampire (2018-03-02 03:10:03+00:00): Hello kent1D.

I found you are fixing place=city which population under 1,000,000 to place=town.
Please kindly stop your editing for a while.
And please tell me about your motivation and the wiki page you are referencing.
(AFAIR, there is a page about place classification related to population, but I could not find)

Currently your edit could be treated as harmful without any notice to community. (e.g. talk-ja Mailing list or some other platform)
Your edits are pretty broader and possibly could be treated as a semi-mechanic edit.

Best,
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
SomeoneElse (2018-03-12 22:10:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba
Glassman (2018-02-28 23:57:34+00:00): An animal hospital should be tagged amenity=veterinary
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dveterinary for more info.
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
SomeoneElse (2018-03-12 22:10:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba
eggie (2018-02-28 22:18:50+00:00): Dag Simon . je hebt van de residential road Campanula een rij bomen gemaakt. Ik pas het even aan. 
Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56766923
eggie (2018-02-28 22:25:44+00:00): Van de bomenrij weer een highway=residential gemaakt. Wellicht een vergissing?
eggie (2018-02-28 22:50:04+00:00): Dit was mijn changeset http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56769755
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-02 03:51:38+00:00): No abbreviations in addresses.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56766940
DannyMcD (2018-02-28 20:12:07+00:00): The City of Ottawa addressing data doesn't have unit numbers for buildings in Accora Village, but they are visible on the ground.
SomeoneElse (2018-03-12 22:10:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 57126162 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a trail map in Manitoba
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-02 16:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56825836 where the changeset comment is: Revert changes of ref=* and highway=* (B 6n to A 36) because it has not been proved yet that the signs along the road have been changed. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=687493#p687493
mueschel (2018-03-01 07:24:44+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - you uploaded a large amount of rectangles that don't seem to belong into the OSM database.
Could you check that?

Cheers, Jan
eggie (2018-03-01 07:27:03+00:00): De name=Esdoorn heb ik er af gehaald. Er zijn maar weinig bomen die een eigen naam hebben.  De naam heb ik toegevoegd als species=Acer pseudoplatanus
Zie ook: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
Simon Harinck (2018-03-02 19:16:52+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Het wijzigen van de weg van de Campanula in een bomenrij was inderdaad een vergissing. Ik had niet eens door dat ik dat had gewijzigd.

Ik probeer de 4e boom er bij te plaatsen.

Bij de nieuwe appartement gebouwen is inderdaad nog e.e.a. te verbeteren. Maar het terrein is ook nog niet helemaal ingevuld. De werkingang is in ieder geval nu niet meer bruikbaar en zal ook dicht gemaakt worden. De balkons heb je er bij het nieuwste hoge gebouw er goed bij getekend. Maar die zijn ook bij de andere gebouwen aanwezig.

Ik zal nog na gaan kijken of de nummers kloppen.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Simon Harinck
Simon Harinck (2018-03-02 19:21:54+00:00): Hmmm, de 4e boom zie ik wel als ik de editor opstart. Waarom zie ik hem niet buiten de editor?
Simon Harinck (2018-03-02 19:23:47+00:00): Trouwens, bedankt voor het nakijken.
eggie (2018-03-02 21:48:22+00:00): Dag Simon,
Dat je de 4de boom niet ziet komt door de traagheid van de rendering van deze kaart. De fietslayer duurt zelfs weken.
Beetje in- en uitzoomen dan komt de boom wel tevoorschijn. Twee bomen zaten geplakt aan dat stukje grasveld. Die heb ik losgemaakt. Dus dan begint de renderingstijd opnieuw.
De balkons heb ik niet getekend. Alle gebouwen worden geïmporteerd vanuit de data van het Kadaster. Kennelijk staat het nieuwste appartementengebouw anders in de BAG.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=campanula&resultOffset=0&objectId=0505300000012080&geometry.x=105457.34540307&geometry.y=423237.86358923&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0505300000012080
Waarschijnlijk zijn de uitstulpingen toch iets wat op de begane grond aanwezig is.
De nummering wordt ook door het Kadaster ingevuld en dat gaat zeer willekeurig.  Sommige kadasters leggen gewoon 30 adresnodes bovenop elkaar. 
Verzoeken voor huizenimport loopt via een verzoek op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. Een speciaal team houdt zich daarmee bezig.
De Colijnstraat is dan aan de beurt.
gscholz (2018-04-08 08:17:08+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created several overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-73.11674&lat=-36.77566&zoom=17&opacity=0.77

Can you please fix this?

Saludos
Guido
wille (2018-05-16 10:52:54+00:00): Oi, Leonardo!

Tudo bem? Obrigado por suas contribuições ao OSM! Nessa edição você acrescentou muitos nomes de rua em Juazeiro do Norte. Qual foi a fonte dos dados que você utilizou?

Por favor, em futuras edições, evite abreviar quaisquer termos nos nomes das ruas como R., Av., Tv. Só abrevie se você não souber o que significa uma parte do nome.

Obrigado!!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56767868
naoliv (2018-05-16 12:43:49+00:00): Leonardo, de onde você obteve o nome dessas ruas, por favor?
Packa72 (2018-02-28 21:42:20+00:00): I inadvertently put fences onto the Blackbrook area of Taunton which are obviously wrong as they straddle roads. This was the result of trying to drag the mouse using an icon other than the hand icon, I believe. I would like to undo these changes.
cleary (2018-05-14 07:49:44+00:00): Hi Spjaquish, I was trying to locate the source for the name given to the road. The data for Toolebuc Middleton Road states source:name=data.qld.gov.au  However I am unable to find where this information is in one of the limited datasets for which we have been given permission. I need some data on other Queensland roads and would find it useful if there is an approved source for such information.  When I surveyed this area about five years ago, the road appeared to be private and not for public use - information about which Queensland roads are public roads would also be helpful to me in making other edits.
spjaquish (2018-05-14 15:14:24+00:00): Hi Cleary,

Regarding your comment on the source of the name for Toolebuc Middleton Road, after looking into data.qld.gov.au I realized that I had accidentally applied the road name to the wrong segment. I have corrected this mistake and OSM should now reflect Toolebuc Middleton Road as the portion of this road going from NW to SE. Thank you for identifying this mistake and if you have any addition questions please let me know! 

Regards,

Spencer