piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2018-07-09 20:50:19+00:00): Звенигородское шоссе? вот здесь: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605579011/history#map=16/55.6228/37.0184&layers=N ? Вы уверены? оно всю жизнь было Петровским. А интерес такой, что я слежу за дорожным строительством в Московском регионе, особенно к западу от Москвы.
QuinMelori@ (2018-07-10 08:28:41+00:00): Тото и оно !! что петровским и а не звенигородским до моей правки
alexey_zakharenkov (2018-07-14 23:02:28+00:00): Специально проехал по Петровскому шоссе - как было по одной полосе в каждом направлении, так и осталось.
QuinMelori@ (2018-07-15 10:54:05+00:00): ( значит меня ввели в информационное заблуждение. Поправлю взад. На неделе сам лично прокачусь.
literan (2018-07-15 11:47:33+00:00): QuinMelori@, ехать необязательно :) Есть свежее видео с дрона, там видно, что реконструкция этого участка не касалась: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGNEdU6CSlM
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-07-08 10:49:34+00:00): Looks good
gscscnd (2018-07-06 14:49:00+00:00): Nie miało być addr:housenumber?
joost schouppe (2018-11-18 12:52:02+00:00): Looks good. I did limit the height restriction to where the sign is. And I also added the directional priority and the maxweight.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60466658
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-12 15:49:29+00:00): Jeśli dalej w Łodzi działasz - dasz radę może https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3353568 sprawdzić?
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-07 05:49:25+00:00): Hi GlenCut, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting service ways, which are visible in the satellite imagery? Thanks.
GlenCut (2018-07-09 12:28:05+00:00): Hello - no one verified that these are indeed service ways.  Most are driveways that are not accessible to the public. Some are just driveways to someones house.  Some are logging roads that are impassable to anything but a motorcycle or skidder.  Many are gated.  They are private property or non accessible property.  They also are not consistent, thousands are missing or incorrect.  They appear to have been added through an automated process.  The census data has an incredible amount of incorrect road data in our area - We just went through the LUCA process with the Census, in which thousands of incorrect roads were either removed, renamed, relocated, added, etc...  The same holds true with roads data from NYS GIS office.
user_5359 (2018-07-08 04:37:16+00:00): Welocme to OSM! Please use the 24h notion for your opening hours.
Anakil (2018-07-06 20:50:34+00:00): Merci pour ta contribution, j'ai simplifié le tagging des "autorisations d'accès" en utilisant les accès implicites de chaque type de chemins (path ou footway) ce qui donne la même chose que ce que tu avais taggés, sans pour autant avoir des tags supplémentaires. Tu peux voir les valeurs implicites sur le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Belgium . Exemple : Par défaut une "footway" (chemin piéton) ne contient que l'accès pour les piétons (à moins qu'indiquer autrement)... 

Ce que tu avais fait était bon, mais juste redondant par rapport aux valeurs implicites (par défaut). :-)
eserte (2019-01-18 19:58:14+00:00): Mehr Infos zur Steganlage: https://www.berliner-woche.de/wilhelmstadt/c-bauen/alte-steganlage-wird-abgerissen_a197599
Minh Nguyen (2018-07-06 17:56:01+00:00): Thanks for your help with destination tagging! Please note that Ohio State Routes are tagged in the format “SR 123” rather than “OH 123”, as described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio/Map_features#Numbered_routes
andreis_telenav (2018-07-10 05:21:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the feedback. I'll pay more attention next time. Best regards.
Zartbitter (2018-07-06 17:41:20+00:00): Hallo, hat es einen bestimmten Grund, warum du dem Parkplatz alle weiteren Attribute, wie z.B. access oder surface, genommen hast?
Discostu36 (2018-07-06 18:13:23+00:00): Hab ich in die site relation übertragen. Oder ist das falsch?
Zartbitter (2018-07-08 08:10:04+00:00): Die Relation habe ich übersehen. Aber dann müsste das amenity=parking auch vom way weg, weil es ja schon auf der Relation ist.
Discostu36 (2018-07-08 08:34:08+00:00): Ok, d.h. der Way kommt ganz weg? Mir fällt jetzt erst auf, dass site=parking gar keine Fläche für den Parkplatz vorsieht. Wird der dann übrhaupt gerendert?
Zartbitter (2018-07-10 06:23:41+00:00): Nee, der way muss natürlich bleiben! Den brauchst du ja für die Relation. Aber die Attribute, die an die Relation verlagert wurden, dürfen nicht auch noch auf dem way liegen. Hier hast du ja sonst zwei Parkplätze in den Daten. Ob das gerendert wird, weiß ich nicht. Aber wenn du dich entschließt, alles in eine Relation zu packen, dann muss es auch konsistent sein bzw. bleiben. Wir mappen ja nicht für den Renderer, der sich laufend ändert. Alternativ kannst du dich auch fragen, ob es überhaupt nötig ist, jede kleinste Beziehung der Objekte untereinander auch zu mappen.
Discostu36 (2018-07-10 06:28:09+00:00): Darüber denke ich auch gerade nach. Im Gegensatz zum Parkplatz Steindamm/Schiffbrücke sind hier die Einzelparkplätze ja nicht verstreut, sondern alle innerhalb des klar definierten Bereichs. Vielleicht ist es echt am schlausten, die Relation zu löschen. Muss da nochmal in mich gehen.
user_5359 (2018-07-06 14:50:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag area=yes without any more information is useless. What do you want to achieve with your entry?
PT-53 (2018-07-07 05:08:44+00:00): Hallo Riedstreuner,

Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz mehrere Hydrantren neu angelegt. Leider hast Du dabei auch den Schlüssel Name verwendet.
Ich denke daß Hydranten keinen Eigennamen (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name) besitzen.
Wie Hydranten richtig und vollständig eingetragen werden kannst Du hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency=fire%20hydrant?uselang=de.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an und löscht die falsche Namen-Belegung wieder ?

Danke und Grüße
PT-53 (2018-07-15 04:50:44+00:00): Hallo Riedstreuner,
berichtigst Du noch die falsche Name-Belegung ?
Danke und Grüße
PT-53 (2018-07-23 05:30:48+00:00): Hallo Riedstreuner,
da Du bisher leider keine Reaktion gezeigt hast, habe ich heute die falsche Namen gelöscht.
Grüße
Zsolt Medgyesi (2018-07-18 15:17:41+00:00): Hello,
úgy tűnik, hogy ezzel a change-set-el valami nem stimmel, mert több pontot is duplán vitt fel. Megoldod, vagy segítsek?
Kösz
zsolt d (2018-08-20 15:49:37+00:00): Szia!
Segítséget megköszönném. Nemrég más is jelezte, hogy egy mentésemben az épületek duplázódtak. JOSM-el szerkesztek, abban nem tudom, hol lehet kontrollálni, hogy vannak-e egymást fedő elemek az adott szerkesztésben, vagy mentésben. Valami mentési bug okozhatja szerintem.
abakus_uploader (2018-07-06 22:31:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-07 05:50:06+00:00): #vandalism ?
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-07 05:51:43+00:00): see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60468769

#vandalism
kapazao (2018-07-07 12:40:13+00:00): Te has cargado todo lo que había en la población y alrededores. Por favor, deshace los cambios y añade poco a poco lo necesario.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60468769
Alecs01 (2018-07-07 14:08:17+00:00): Acabo de revertir los cambios aquí: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60490030
geoaria (2018-07-09 14:54:56+00:00): در ویرایش های خود بیشتر دقت کنید و از رسم بدون مطالعه قوانین نقشه خودراری کنید . خطای شما توسط osmi‌شناسایی و اصلاح گردید
SomeoneElse (2018-07-29 10:12:18+00:00): Hello - can I ask you about your changes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604774286/history ?  It looks, to me, like an entirely fake feature.  In your change here did you verify that it actually existed?
aceman444 (2019-05-04 13:21:53+00:00): Zdravim, v com spociva toto "cistenie tagov"? Preco je odstranenie tracktype=grade1 na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5073099 prinosom? Ta znacka nevyzerala nadbytocna. tracktype nemusi byt nutne len na highway=track, precitajte si wiki.
FishDoctor (2019-05-04 18:16:53+00:00): Zdravim. Pripadalo mi to tam nadbytocne. Je to servisna cesta, asfaltka. Vid https://www.google.sk/maps/@47.912965,18.0093446,3a,75y,312.47h,78.91t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sC4vLy001p18OCO-4qxEz2w!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo2.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DC4vLy001p18OCO-4qxEz2w%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D143.26352%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656

A presne ako si napisal, vacsinou sa to pouziva pri highway=track. A aj na wiki sa pise, ze sa tracktype pri inych cestach pouziva vacsinou pri " in less-developed places where many main roads are unpaved.", co si nemyslim, ze je uprostred mesta.
aceman444 (2019-05-04 19:04:31+00:00): No neviem, zato ze je to asfaltka este to nemusi byt 'service'. highway=service je to nahodou teraz, lebo som to ja kedysi zmenil. Ale ked si pozriete historiu, bolo to predtym highway=track (a predtym zase 'service'). Takze asi to nie je jednoznacne. A ked to niekto zase zmeni na 'track', to tracktype by tam bolo uzitocne.
FishDoctor (2019-05-05 07:46:21+00:00): Ked to niekto zmeni na track, tak by mal definovat aj tracktype. Ale mylim, ze lesna alebo polna cesta z toho uz nebude. Je to v zastavanej oblasti a pokracuje to pekne vyasfaltovanym cyklochodnikom.
Andrea Musuruane (2018-07-07 12:55:45+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Faccio fatica a capire l'etichettatura che hai usato: highway=footway + footway=sidewalk. Ovvero un marciapiede. Però non vedo la strada principale. Puoi chiarire? Grazie, Andrea
Andrea_1993 (2018-07-07 13:21:24+00:00): Ho corretto l'etichettatura; avevo erroneamente segnato un sentiero pedonale con un marciapiede
Andrea Musuruane (2018-07-08 08:35:08+00:00): Ciao. c'erano ancora due percorsi sovrapposti. Ne ho eliminato uno. Prova a vedere se va bene così. Ciao, Andrea
Supaplex (2018-07-06 14:17:30+00:00): 跟這邊的資料
http://ptx.transportdata.tw/MOTC/v2/Bike/Station/Kaohsiung?$top=3000&$format=XML
有什麼差別呢?
user_101460 (2019-03-27 15:58:41+00:00): こんにちは。nogajunと申します。
Miyachiさんの書かれている地図で、いくつか気になる点があったので書きます。

地図の下絵には、bingではなく「国土地理院 全国最新写真」か「国土地理院 電子国土基本図」を使ってください。
bingには数m単位の誤差があるのでbingを元に書くと全部ズレてしまいます。

大歳神社を書かれていますが、エリアと道路(way)は、くっつけないでください。
OSMのルールでは、道路は道路の中心に書くのでエリアとくっつくことはありません。

交差している道路は、道路同士をくっつけてください。
こちらは逆に道路同士がくっついていないので、交差点ではなく重なった道になっています。交差点で曲がれる道路はノードを共有するようにしてください。

以上、よろしくお願いします。
Andrea Musuruane (2018-07-07 12:58:14+00:00): Ciao, i percorsi 605636988 e 605636987 sono sovrapposti. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea_1993 (2018-07-07 13:01:50+00:00): Ciao, grazie per avermelo segnalato. Come faccio a specificare che è un ponte senza creare una traccia sograpposta?
Andrea_1993 (2018-07-07 13:15:01+00:00): *sovrapposta?
Andrea Musuruane (2018-07-08 08:26:46+00:00): Devi spezzare il percorso in tre. Due percorsi che conducono al ponte e il terzo percorso è il ponte stesso. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2018-07-07 12:59:13+00:00): Ciao. Il percorso 60469204 (una track) è sovrapposto a un footway che hai creato in precedenza.
mueschel (2018-07-12 10:53:24+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way? 
The tag "ref:fr:" looks like a mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605638611

Cheers, Jan
eggie (2018-07-06 15:05:16+00:00): Dag Kardoen.. Je hebt van de outer multipolygoon nu drie outers gemaakt. dat is wat ongebruikelijk. Misschien per ongeluk?
eggie (2018-07-06 20:36:51+00:00): MP hersteld.
viloan (2018-07-06 14:31:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-07-06 15:07:22+00:00): Dag Kardoen.. Op een fietspad hoef je niet aan tegeven dat er fietsers mogen rijden.. Ook auto's zijn per default uitgesloten.
eggie (2018-07-06 15:10:30+00:00): bicycle=dismount allen gebruiken bij korte stukjes. Bv een trap met fietsgoot.. of een steiger naar een boot. Soms een korte onderbreking in een fietspad. Hier hoort het niet behalve als er een bord staat: fietsers afstappen.
footway=sidewalk hoort hier niet. Haal je dat er af? 
Wanneer je hier mag fietsen dan gewoon bicycle=yes.
Groet,
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2018-07-07 13:01:03+00:00): Ciao, il percorso 605643226 è senza etichette. Ciao, Andrea
felipeeugenio (2020-05-04 17:00:02+00:00): Hello
Hardly tracks these trails
Did you went there?
robram2004 (2020-05-04 17:08:19+00:00): Hello, I think not.
But I was using tracks from strava to draw.
I rode in SF pass and another chilean roads.
felipeeugenio (2020-05-04 17:20:43+00:00): Ok, Please be careful in the north of Chile. It is pure desert, and the fact that some guy walked through somewhere doesn´t mean that there a road there. Hardly a path.

regards
robram2004 (2020-05-04 17:25:54+00:00): ok. 
Thanks.

Best regards from Brazil
Palolo (2023-01-17 15:21:42+00:00): Are there really 11 different pet shops in the Burigi village? A pet shop is a shop that sells special food for dogs and cats as well as toys or fish to keep in an aquarium.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-07 05:44:01+00:00): ?
d_berger (2018-07-07 12:10:21+00:00): Der knappe wiki-Eintrag zu Tag:railway=funicular scheint davon auszugehen, dass eine Standseilbahn nur Stationen an den Enden hat. Wenn ich die Einträge zu Tag:railway=station, Tag:railway=halt und Tag:railway=stop vergleiche, dann ist 'station' und 'halt' immer _neben_ den Gleisen zu verwenden, 'stop' hingegen _immer_ auf den Gleisen; was wiederum dem Eintrag unter railway=funicular widerspricht. Unter PTv2 ist das um einiges klarer gelöst, PTv1 produziert hier ein unnötiges Problem.
captain_slow (2018-07-07 13:24:39+00:00): Da müsste dann wohl mal die ganze Seilbahn Rigiblick überarbeitet werden. Und auch die Polybahn und die Dolderbahn, die haben die Station- bzw. Halt-Nodes auch jeweils auf den Gleisen.
Soll ich dieses Changeset trotzdem mal revertieren? Denn es ist schlussendlich ja korrekter so wie es vorher war.
d_berger (2018-07-11 09:55:23+00:00): Bin durch mit der Überarbeitung, Db konnte ich als 'railway' problemlos auf PTv2 und railway=stop korrigieren; bei SR und PB gibt es das Problem, dass funicular nicht als Routentyp vorgesehen ist; hab es jetzt mal bei station für die Endpunkte und halt für die Zwischenstationen geändert.
captain_slow (2018-07-11 10:10:54+00:00): Vielen Dank!
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
user_5359 (2018-07-07 16:42:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:27:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:48:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:38:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:26:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:27:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 14:00:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-23 07:55:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
goedegazelle (2018-07-07 15:41:36+00:00): De wijziging in de Eglantier is onterecht. Er wordt ingrijpend verbouwd maar de contouren zoals die op BAG staan komen niet overeen met de (huidige) realiteit. De wijziging van Autopalace (Molenmakershoek) is daarentegen wel terecht. De rest van de wijzigingen kan ik helaas niet controleren.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:50:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:27:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:46:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:52:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:47:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].