piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-12-05 22:04:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77981790, 77962512, 78003034, 77978188, 77993895, 77970472, 78006814, 77966863, 77968576, 78016990, 77964262, 77974397, 77951657, 77985042, 77998476, 78011603, 77965312, 78009193, 77958037, 77989512, 78015407, 78013657, 77971866 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Stephan van Helden (2023-01-14 17:18:22+00:00): Hi, du hattest die Eiche https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6245217595 als Naturdenkmal markiert, sie ist aber weder in der Liste des LRA noch in Fin-Web als solches geführt. War da ein ND-Schild drauf?
Stephan van Helden (2023-01-16 14:40:36+00:00): (Per E-Mail geklärt, ist wohl kein ND.)
kartonage (2019-01-30 04:41:25+00:00): Hi, wir mappen nicht für den Renderer und mappen Straßen als Flächen. Siehst du, dass es hier sonstwo so gemacht wird? Nein? Gut. Reicht schon, wenn du das unnützerweise für die die kleinen nichtflächigen Parkwege machst. Danke.
SpaLeo (2019-01-30 07:25:03+00:00): Natürlich sollten Straßen als Flächen gemappt werden. Das nennt sich micromapping. Das einzige, worüber man sich streiten kann, ist, ob Wege in einem Park pedestarian, pathoder footway sind.
SpaLeo (2019-01-30 07:26:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Micromapping
geoaria (2019-02-01 09:42:46+00:00): دوربرگردان در این مسیر با تگ primary_link می بایست ثبت شود
eggie (2019-02-18 09:19:26+00:00): Ha Ad.. 'k Heb weer natural = water toegevoegd aan de marina bij Goudswaard anders staat het allemaal droog hier. Dit ondanks dat JOSm dan protesteerd. Wellicht beter dan marina en water als aparte layer mappen. 
(Goudswaard)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80054/4.27780
Gr eggie
viloan (2019-01-29 19:38:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
MrKrisKrisu (2019-01-29 20:15:58+00:00): *Fahrplanwechsel 2018
Tomas Straupis (2019-01-30 06:12:23+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas. Prašome NEGADINTI duomenų.
highflyer74 (2019-01-30 07:53:06+00:00): Hello!

Could you please check the name of this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667018312. This should only be the road name and no other data.

Also ple
highflyer74 (2019-01-30 07:57:09+00:00): ase make sure to use proper changeset comments. Comments like "-22.6574402,-43.1417542,0" are of no help to your fellow mappers. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments to learn why. Thank you!

------------------------------------------------

Hola!

¿Podría por favor comprobar el nombre de esta calle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667018312. Este sólo debe ser el nombre de la carretera y no otros datos.

También asegúrese de usar los comentarios apropiados sobre el conjunto de cambios. Comentarios como "-22.6574402,-43.1417542,0" no son de ninguna ayuda para sus compañeros. Por favor, lea https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios para saber por qué. Gracias!
wambacher (2019-01-30 08:06:37+00:00): in short words: STOP THIS STUFF.
It is not correct to name streets like that.
freebeer (2019-01-30 10:37:34+00:00): nor is it correct to name streets as per the bad changeset comments, as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667014214 created by the changeset prior to this.

if such a road name is not known to you, then do not try to name it with such obviously wrong information.

i have seen a *lot* of these fake names when looking around mexico in past months.
mosstreet (2019-01-29 22:43:25+00:00): не нравиться парк, будет газон, лучше бы решил что с проездом там делать, у м. Сокольники, проезда нет, дорога есть.
literan (2019-01-30 07:03:53+00:00): А там дорогу разобрали полностью? Летом она просто перекрыта была (соответственно, на ней access=no стоит). Если разобрали, полагаю, исправить на highway=construction (потому что после окончания стройки метро ее восстановят)
zaizone (2019-04-16 15:00:21+00:00): Bonjour sfz37, je souhaiterais vous faire remarquer que certaines de vos contributions sont très similaires aux données de Google Maps :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6204352710
https://goo.gl/maps/BRk71Tq6XoT2
En effet, le nom est exactement identique : "Ste daoud freres autos", sans accents, sans majuscule. Réfèrons nous aux images présentes dans mapillary (source autorisée pour contribuer dans OSM) : 
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/s9HZ5OJAnQc3uzitLlOIFQ
Le nom écrit sur l'enseigne est "St DAOUD Fréres Auto" → il est écrit "St" et non "Ste", il y a un accent sur "Fréres" (l'orthographe correcte étant "Frères"), mais pas de "s" à "auto". J'en déduis que vous avez fait un copié-collé à partir des données de Google Maps...
zaizone (2019-04-16 15:20:25+00:00): Je suis désolé, mon idée n'est pas de vous dégouter d'OpenStreetMap, mais il faut que vous compreniez que les violations de copyright de Google Maps pourraient causer de sérieux soucis à notre projet. J'ai tenté de vous contacter préalablement afin que nous puissions faire les ajustements nécessaires...

Le plus simple serait surement que vous acceptiez de dialoguer avec moi, ou les autres membres de la communauté, afin d'évaluer la situation. De plus vous pourriez bénéficier de quelques bon conseils pour cartographier. Nous avons tous un peu appris des autres contributeurs ! 

En attendant de vos nouvelles, bonne continuation.
mapman44 (2019-12-12 02:37:06+00:00): Please do not attach areas, such as farmland, to streets or highways. The farmland does not extend to the center of the road and it makes editing the road much more difficult. Thanks.
gs3§zba (2019-02-08 17:56:33+00:00): Hallo Jaeger52, ich schlage vor, statt dem name-Tag das description-Tag zu verwenden. Außerdem solltest du vielleicht ein building-Tag verwenden (ich weiß ja nicht, was da genau in Ruinen liegt) und möglicherweise gibt der wiki-Eintrag für ruins noch eine gute Empfehlung zum passenden Tagging. Übrigens ist auch noch ein kleiner Schreibfehler drin. Beste Grüße.
eggie (2019-01-30 13:54:54+00:00): reverted door  Wijzigingenset #66771173
george1201 (2022-03-11 23:08:12+00:00): Macht "Mittelschmallen" als Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6245477790 einen Sinn? Das sollte doch eher ein Gebiet sein. Ist überhaupt irgendwo definiert, was "Mittelschmallen" überhaupt ist? Und wo befinden sich die anderen XXX-Schmallen?
Radboss (2022-03-12 22:54:38+00:00): Wenn für ein Gebiet die genauen Umrisse nicht bekannt sind, was in dem Kontext von Gemarkungen durchaus regelmäßig vorkommt, dann ist ein Knoten (node) nach einer Fläche (area) die beste Option. Insofern ist der Eintrag auf der Karte mE so durchaus stimmig.

Zu einem historischen Hintergrund des Namens oder weiterer lokaler Bezeichnungen in dieser Gegend habe ich jedoch keine weiteren Informationen.
george1201 (2022-03-12 23:12:25+00:00): Danke. Das ist eine akzeptable Begründung. Leider sind mir auch keine weiteren Infos zum "Mittelschwallen" bekannt.
Radboss (2022-03-14 22:27:04+00:00): Zu einigen der Gemarkungen sind mitunter nur die ungefähre Lage (Mittelpunkt) bekannt. Möglicherweise kann man über Archive und über den Namen selbst noch weitere Informationen gewinnen, für eine Einzeichnung in OSM sind die Daten aber mE durchaus ausreichend.
stevea (2019-01-29 21:59:17+00:00): What is your source for the lcn=15 route?  You might say "an on-the-ground sign" and I'd be OK with that.  Here is a map which does not show route 15:  https://www.marinbike.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Marin-Bike-Map-full.jpg
clay_c (2019-01-29 23:00:06+00:00): I wasn't the one who added lcn=15 to these routes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-29 21:25:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 66503430, 66503785, 66503942, 66704312, 66704727.
eggie (2019-01-30 13:54:30+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #66771084
Hypsicratea (2019-01-29 21:55:28+00:00): In the area with the removed residential roads, there are some dirt paths, and a bike path (that runs mostly parallel to Eastwick Drive but behind the houses). These would need to be tracked with a GPS and added in.
viloan (2019-01-29 22:03:54+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Carol Nunes (2019-01-31 21:48:27+00:00): ela será aceita ou tem algum erro?
naoliv (2019-01-31 21:49:56+00:00): As edições são aceitas diretamente.
Carol Nunes (2019-01-31 21:55:13+00:00): em relação ao tempo q elas demoram a aparecer no mapa?
naoliv (2019-01-31 22:01:37+00:00): Já são gravadas na hora no mapa.
O que pode acontecer é do servidor demorar um pouco para desenhar os objetos novos.
DressyPear4 (2019-01-30 10:52:25+00:00): Reverti o que foi deletado.
dikkeknodel (2019-01-30 19:01:32+00:00): Hi Suse41,

You always present your imagery used as Bing aerial and gpx data file. However looking at your entries it does not look like you actually had a gpx. May this be a comment you forgot to remove? Please try to always give correct source information as it helps others to interpret your contributions.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
Suse41 (2019-01-31 16:12:44+00:00): Hello, I'm not familiar with identifying imagery used. I didn't know this was something I needed to identify. Can you please provide more info? This is the first time I've been asked about this. Thank you
dikkeknodel (2019-02-02 12:11:23+00:00): Hi Suse41,

Whenever you hit the Save button in iD editor, on the left side of the screen a menu appears where you can enter information about the sources you used for the edits. 
I'm not too familiar with iD editor, since I use another editor myself, but most likely it automatically fills some fields based on the last values you used. 
However, every time you save, you should update these fields to reflect what you actually used.
Please have a detailed look there and familiarize yourself with how you should fill those fields correctly. 
A good way to get a bit more familiar is doing the iD walkthrough, which you can find via de ? mark button on the right side when you are in edit mode.
I hope this helps.
Cheers,
Raymond
joost schouppe (2019-02-05 15:55:50+00:00): Bedankt Brecht!
Ben je zeker dat het zone 50 is? Bijna alle wegen hier zijn zone 30, het zou me verbazen dat deze een uitzondering is (kan altijd natuurlijk).
Ik heb het stukje net ten westen ook gecorrigeerd, dit had nog de oude foute naam.
BrechtW (2019-02-05 19:27:52+00:00): Dag Joost
Het is inderdaad een zone 30, had ik over het hoofd gezien. Bedankt voor de review!
joost schouppe (2019-02-07 13:41:00+00:00): OK, ik heb het aangepast. Bedankt voor de bevestiging.
skyper (2023-04-25 15:53:27+00:00): Hallo Georg,
kannst Du Dir bitte nochmal das MP (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9277450) anschauen. Keine Ahnung warum das im Wiki so schlecht erklärt ist, aber bei MPs dürfen die Mitglieder keine gemeinsame Kanten haben. Im Zweifel nicht die Gebäude verwenden, sondern neue Polygone um die Gebäude einzeichnen.
Viele Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2023-04-25 15:56:40+00:00): Ah, trifft wahrscheinlich auch für die anderen MPs zu.
RicoElectrico (2022-01-10 14:01:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3004438
Adam_Piszczek (2022-01-10 18:28:59+00:00): Poprawione.
viloan (2019-01-30 00:30:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DigitalSciGuy (2019-01-30 00:47:35+00:00): Also added missing and corrected locations of crossovers.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-30 20:27:57+00:00): Hi, you've mapped some pretty private infomation in this changeset, I'd assume you don't want everyone to know where your home is on a public map... check out:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
Warin61 (2019-07-28 07:00:13+00:00): Hi,
You tagged way 667059306 as sport = picnic ... 'picnic' is not a sport... I have removed this tag. I have added the 3 individual pitches for each sport. 
For the 'picnics' I would suggest locating a more suitable area and adding a node with the tag tourism=picnic_site.

Keep mapping.
nevw (2019-01-30 02:29:19+00:00): Hi you need to add a tag to define what you are adding to the map, such as an office or trade or shop etc and you need to inform yourself on the correct way to do that, addr address tags are also required to be added to the building you operate from so the addition can be verified or it will be deleted.
nevw (2019-01-30 02:58:23+00:00): shop=car_parts is probably suitable.
Here is an example of a well mapped business...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6241442471
os-emmer (2025-04-25 17:15:03+00:00): Hello 🇨🇿 Roman Horník,
you added this object a long time ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6245794952. Can you maybe help me with these questions?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4715623
viloan (2019-01-30 00:58:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jmapb (2019-02-16 22:13:57+00:00): Hi, the address you've used is 124 2nd Ave but the node is located inside 122 -- is it possible the node needs to be moved?
jmapb (2019-01-30 03:00:37+00:00): Hi Shane-Lester 99, welcome to OSM!

It looks like you've added a building here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667064179 ) overtop of an existing building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241845016 ). This is considered a mapping error. It's probably better to just draw a node for St Johns and put it inside the existing building, rather than creating a new one. It would also be good to tag it with some basic info, like "amenity=college" and "website=https://www.stjohns.edu/campuses/manhattan"

I'd be happy to assist with this if you have any questions.

Thanks for your contributions, jmapb
jmapb (2019-02-27 14:46:53+00:00): Reverted in changeset 67617678, added St. John's as a node in changeset 67620408
SomeoneElse (2019-01-30 09:56:45+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please don't add things that don't exist just to try and "improve your chances" with Pokemon Go.  As you'll have noticed before, these always get noticed and always get changed back.  If you do have any questions about what it's OK to add to OpenStreetMap and what it isn't, you can send an email to data@openstreetmap.org for more help.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-30 10:06:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66764981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by a new user.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66756697 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-30 10:06:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66764981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by a new user.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66756697 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-30 10:06:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66764981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by a new user.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66756697 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-30 10:06:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66764981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by a new user.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66756697 for more details.
AlaskaDave (2021-04-25 03:12:34+00:00): Hi,

I've been working in the area of Fern Ridge Lake and have come across many of your edits from a couple of years ago. There are many landuse=farmlands areas and natural=wetland that are attached to highways and other things. This is a practice that I would discourage. The natural=wood or natural=wetland or various landuses DO NOT include any part of the highways that border them. 
Later on, when one is editing those areas to better align them with recent imagery, each of those duplicate nodes must be unglued before those edits can be finished.
Such edits require a huge amount of time.
Please refrain from doing this in the future.

Thanks,
Dave
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-30 10:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66765544 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppet changes made to try and evade a request to communicate.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2487 through 2491 and 2494
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-30 10:28:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66765544 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppet changes made to try and evade a request to communicate.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2487 through 2491 and 2494
geoaria (2019-02-01 08:49:57+00:00): مسیر مادی نیاصرم را پیاده راه کرده اید ولی مسیر یکطرفه باغ جنت را هم باید از حالت یکطرفه خارج می کردید . تا به صورت خطا در اُسمی گزارش نشود. مسیر باغ جنت را اصلاح کردم. وقتی مسیری را ادیت می کنید به تاثیرات آن تغیییرات بر روی مسیر های دیگر هم توجه کنید.
kartonage (2019-01-30 06:11:36+00:00): Hi,

in this changeset; that is spanning half a continent, you have removed several address tags in Berlin. Two things: Please use smaller/local changesets and also do not remove correct address information.
I have restored the addresses.

Thank you
nevw (2019-01-30 07:00:27+00:00): reverted due to shifting of way nodes
michalfabik (2019-01-30 16:01:56+00:00): Hi, there was nothing wrong with the data you deleted. I reverted your change. Please contact local communities before changing stuff in places you don't know.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-30 10:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66764981 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by a new user.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66756697 for more details.
Warin61 (2022-03-06 21:09:15+00:00): Hi,

This new Relation: San Remo Coastal Reserve (9278066) missed the preexisting Way: San Remo Coast Reserve (376043009) which is still present. 

Note the relation has been changed by mappers adding landcovers... so the park relation my not be accurate any more. 
I have re-closed the relation following a mapper editing paths...
michalfabik (2019-01-30 15:51:11+00:00): Hi, "bb" is a valid house number in Bosnia, surprising as it sounds. Please don't fix these.
mavl (2019-02-27 16:55:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2019-01-30 16:53:45+00:00): Hello 5XWarrior,
Please use meaningful changeset discussion comments when making changes.  Don't say things like "correct admin_centre" or worse (as here) no comment at all.  Explain what was wrong before, what you've fixed and what the source was.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
jmapb (2019-01-30 15:13:31+00:00): Hi -- This office is tagged with address 4910 but the node is placed in the building 4908. Is it possible that the node is positioned incorrectly?
eggie (2019-01-30 08:55:15+00:00): Dag rgh,
Scholen zijn altijd lastig. Je kunt ook gewoon op de BAG adresnode bijtaggen.
Dus alle info op de adresnode.  Nu heb je nog een keer een adres toegevoegd dat er al is. Dat is 1x te veel. 
Een basisschool krijgt altijd de tag amenity=school mee. Dat levert op veel kaarten ook een schoolsymbool op.
Dus amenity=school toevoegen!
Soms wordt het schoolterrein zelf als amenity=school getagd en staat alle info daar. Het is dus een keuze. Kijk je nog even?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-30 09:06:51+00:00): De BAG adressen op de apartementen en de school zijn allemaal Sint Martinusstraat. Of het één of het ander klopt niet.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-01-30 09:12:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
eggie (2019-01-30 11:37:48+00:00): De info heb ik even gekopieerd naar de adresnode.. amenity school toegevoegd.
Duplikaat adres verwijderd.  Nu zal de naam straks renderen.
Je kunt ook kiezen voor het hele terrein.
Gr Eggie
rghvdberg (2019-01-31 06:40:51+00:00): heb nog ff gekeken en nergens zie ik een bordje Johanneshof ..
Wel bordjes Sint Martinusstraat (met van die pijltjes met nummers)
eggie (2019-01-31 07:20:12+00:00): Oke... Pas je zelf de straatnaam aan?
Gr Eggie