piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
clay_c (2022-06-11 00:57:39+00:00): I'm glad you're trying to make things better, Avasquez. And I apologize for my accusatory tone earlier.

It's good to hear that Upland will stop using labels from OpenStreetMap at some point. Hopefully that will reduce the incentive for people to make edits that don't align with reality. In the meantime, I appreciate your effort in helping quality-check edits coming from Upland members.

As for the content of this particular changeset: we have a principle "one feature, one OSM element". This parking lot point was added 14 years ago, but it should have been removed when the parking lot area was drawn around it. Any additional information about this parking lot should go on the area instead of the point.

Though I'm curious why you added that the lot costs "25 upx" to park there. As far as I know, "upx" is not a currency accepted anywhere outside of a video game. Unless it's possible for a person to drive their car to this lot in real life and pay UPX to park there, I don't think that sort of information belongs on OSM.
Avasquez369 (2022-06-11 01:23:02+00:00): Okay Zelonewolf, So basically you are saying nothing will change on your end. Volunteers are allowed to disrespect people, as they choose. That's fine... Please note, that your non-profit foundation is owned by an organization that seems to think they have a say so on how their volunteers act.
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-11 01:45:07+00:00): If you are interested in the OpenStreetMap Foundation (which isn't "owned" by anyone), you can read more about it here:

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/
Avasquez369 (2022-06-11 02:32:06+00:00): Hi Clay-c, to be honest, being new to the upland game, I saw many title changes taking place in the metaverse, I was told it can easily be done on OSM. Being new to OSM I thought it was okay, foolishly I didn't think of reading the rules and so I happily thought I could add titles, as I pleased. Once I found out I couldn't. I stopped adding iconic people's names and locations without identification. I did apologize, but even that was not good enough. After thinking about it, I figured by simply adding a page and explaining the rules and regulations of OSM,  could help both Upland and the OSM community. Believe it or not, I thought, both websites can help each other. And, I thought by adding the a discord page would enlighten Upland owners of the problem and maybe impose strict rules not to make any changes to OSM.  

Okay, UPX is a token used by uplanders to buy and sell properties (NFTs). I know it was silly to add upx, but I honestly thought it was a fun thing to do, in turn illustrating my ignorance of the OSM rules.  Please note, in upland, a player can not own parking lots, unless it has an address, and even then it is shown in upland as a buildable lot, not a parking lot. I figured it would be clever and funny to add upx as the excepted parking fee, but, there is no way to collect any tokens for a parking lot.  To the best of my knowledge, Upland has no intentions of adding parking lots,  because players are building rental units on everything with an address.

Yes, having a name on a property can increase the value and saleability of their properties. But unlike me, as of late, players don't understand that titles will soon be worthless anyway. 

Stay professional.
Avasquez369 (2022-06-11 02:38:27+00:00): Zlonewolf, well then, someone is acting like they own the OSM domain. 

Here is a copy of their email. 

Merci d'avoir contacté le département Abuse de Gandi.net

La société Gandi SAS prend très au sérieux les plaintes qui lui sont soumises et reste très active dans sa participation envers les activités illégales sur Internet.

Nous mettons tout en œuvre afin de vous apporter une réponse dans les meilleurs délais.

Le département Abuse

----

Thank you for contacting the Abuse Department of Gandi.net.

We take abuse complaints seriously and process them with due diligence. As an active player in the fight against spam and illicit activities on the internet.

We will examine your case in detail and will do our best to give you a reply as soon as possible.

Gandi Abuse team
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-11 02:48:08+00:00): Gandi is simply a domain name registrar. See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name_registrar

They have nothing to do with the operation of OSM or OSMF.  They provide the service of connecting domain names to IP addresses.
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-11 02:49:29+00:00): If you are looking to register a complaint, that can be directed to the Data Working Group, who can be reached at data@openstreetmap.org
Avasquez369 (2022-06-11 02:54:37+00:00): Being no owners or governance, means volunteers can run ramped, is this correct? If so, You must really be hurting for volunteers, to allow his actions to continue. Okay, I'm done.
MxxCon (2022-06-11 05:11:46+00:00): Look at the timeline of events. It's all public, timestamped and easily auditable. You made numerous incorrect or low quality edits. I commented on them educating you about your mistakes. For each comment you received email notification about it. Yet you ignored them, didn't reply to my messages as the norm in this community and continued to make incorrect edits. How should that be interpreted if not intentional disrespect to the OSM? You then went back and tried to again edit fixed data to suit your personal needs in an external game.

Furthermore, in this very changeset you explicitly admitted that you knowingly and intentionally added wrong payment= tag to this parking lot node because you thought it was funny. How is this not vandalism?!

In changesets 121395223 and 121911028 you straight up spam changeset comment that you are selling NFTs!

In changeset 121792082 you gave incorrect names to tennis courts even though documentation explicitly states that name tag is not to be used as description https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions. You used iD editor to make those edits. In it next to "name" field(and every other tag) there's a button "i". When you click on it you get an explanation of that tag with a link to a more detailed documentation page which also explicitly states that name= tag is not intended as description.

In changeset 121911028 you even accused me of being a racist! How is that not disrespect?!

And now after all this you sent a complaint email to osm's registrar?! What you've done is equivalent to not liking a price you saw in a supermarket, running outside, seeing a phone number on a dumpster in the back and calling that recycling company to complain about the supermarket! 🤯🤦‍♂️
Avasquez369 (2022-06-11 09:10:20+00:00): Mxxcon, You want to continue.  Do you think I would sit here and explain my actions if I intentionally vandalized OSM? 

It's obvious that you are butt hurt because I sounded you on your rude treatment towards me. Now that I manned up to my mistakes, you should man up to yours by apologizing.  

Question; Is there a procedure that volunteers can go through to delete one's profile? If You and the other volunteers feel I deserve to be deleted, after my explanation, so be it, but, I ask to do so by going through the proper procedures, not name calling, and reacting out of anger.  I am starting to believe that maybe you aren't a racist based on your record, but, rather you may have a kiss of narcissism, especially IF, you can't confess to what you are obviously doing. 

You, being a volunteer for 10 years, I wonder if other volunteers in your group feel the same. If so, You may consider retiring. 

That said, I'm not sure why you and the other volunteer feel that Non-profit organizations and their volunteers are immune to lawsuits, then daring me to start one. That was not my intention, i was only warning you that could be a possibility. Do OSM and whoever pays the bills a favor, google that as well. Your admitted discriminatory focus toward one group of people, (Uplanders) is not good for OSM, or Upland in general. 

In ending, If I am not banned, feel free to delete all my entries as you suggested, and let's start over while I learn OSM system.  Meantime if allowed, I prefer someone else, less sour, to review my entries because, at this point, it's obvious your hate toward uplanders and me, can't be controlled. 

Oh, to the other volunteer, thank you, for letting me know where to file a complaint.  What I did,  does not, and should not excuse your response and how you treat an entire group of people.

No need to respond to me, submit your case to the OSM review board (if there is one) to let the chips fall where they may. I'm good either way.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-11 10:47:39+00:00): @Avasquez369 Re "Do you think I would sit here and explain my actions if I intentionally vandalized OSM?" - reading from the bottom of the list at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=16066706 upwards, you have been asked politely not to add things that don't exist in the real world to OSM, then slightly less politely, then been accused of vandalism.    I have summarised that at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6057 .  We'd love you to continue adding things to OpenStreetMap, but please - only add things that really exist in the real world, not fantasy parks around "Bobby Fischer's childhood home" or a parking charge in a fantasy curency on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243955837/history .
As you've seen, your fantasy additions so far have been removed from OpenStreetMap (and I've asked questions about a couple of others) 
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Avasquez369 (2022-06-11 16:28:03+00:00): Hi Andy, I'm still a little confused after reading your user Block summary, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6057 you left out much of Mxxcon's, rude statements and called the ones you left, 'slightly less politely' But regardless, in every reply you included, I was polite and illustrates my ignorance of what can be posted.  To be fair to me you should not have excluded the rude mockery made by Mxxcon that led to this thread, and this thread as well. Do I smell a conspiracy here?

Anyway, In this thread, I explained that his actions could possibly jeopardize OSM someday, including the careless dare to start legal action and stating an uneducated statement that a non-profit foundation can not be sued.  Besides blocking, If you haven't already, please remove all my 22 requests or direct me to a link that will teach me how to remove them, (It's obvious that I don't know how, after deleting things I didn't intend to on Olvera Street, boy if I recall, that was my first screw up that became worse). Anyways I will remove those that were approved, then I will close my account.
 
It is obvious that you have no intentions of changing or disciplining the way your volunteer discriminates against a group of people.

PS: You do have some very kind, understanding, and polite volunteers in your group. You should thank them and give them a big hug for me.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-11 17:14:31+00:00): > Do I smell a conspiracy here?

No.  It is not OK to "politely" add things that do not exist to OpenStreetMap.

> If you haven't already, please remove all my 22 requests 

I will check what is left and will remove them.

> It is obvious that you have no intentions of changing or disciplining the way your volunteer discriminates against a group of people.

You have already been cc:ed on a number of comments that I've made which makes it abundantly clear that that statement is untrue - presumably you are hoping that casual readers here will not be aware of those.
willkmis (2022-06-01 15:41:13+00:00): Hi. Please do not use the name= tag to describe features. Instead, you can use tags, such as sport=tennis in this case.
MxxCon (2022-06-04 03:27:58+00:00): Vandalism by upland editor. This edit should be reverted.
Larmax (2022-06-03 13:01:10+00:00): Never heard of those names, typos shouldn't be included in the name tags
user_2066394 (2022-06-09 13:15:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9385466398
Passen
name=*
description=*
material=*
zu *=wayside_cross ?
Stephan van Helden (2022-06-09 13:35:09+00:00): Gute Frage. Das war vorher historic=stone, und ich habe es auf wayside_cross geändert, weil es eigentlich ein Sühnekreuz ist und vom BLfD auch als solches geführt wird.
Stephan van Helden (2022-06-09 13:37:34+00:00): Hier ein Bild von dem Objekt:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_ClbVzhQewfsdXHagF1QifUWDURJfElb/view?usp=sharing
Marc Schütz (2022-06-09 19:45:31+00:00): historic=stone finde ich passender, kann man auch mit stone_type=conciliation_cross ergänzen.

Ist im Wiki hier dokumentiert, mit sehr ähnlicher Abbildung:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dstone

Unter wayside_cross stelle ich mir normalerweise was größeres vor; die Funktion/der Zweck ist ja auch ein anderer (Sühne vs Volksfrömmigkeit).
Marc Schütz (2022-06-09 19:52:36+00:00): Der Stein ist i.Ü. beim BLfD in der Gemarkung Priesendorf geführt, liegt hier aber auf Eltmanner Gebiet. Wahrscheinlich verläuft die Grenze in Wirklichkeit näher an der Straße (vgl. auch die Feldwege), das wollte ich aber mangels Quelle nicht anpassen.
Stephan van Helden (2022-06-10 12:29:14+00:00): Stimmt, die Grenze ist falsch eingezeichnet - übrigens auch in der Normalansicht und in den niedrigeren Zoomstufen der Topo-Karte im BayernAtlas. Und auch das Sühnekreuz ist als Kreuz 35 m weiter südöstlich eingetragen:

https://geoportal.bayern.de/bayernatlas/?lang=de&topic=ba&catalogNodes=11&bgLayer=atkis&E=622896&N=5531478&zoom=14&layers=d0e7d4ea-62d8-46a0-a54a-09654530beed&crosshair=marker

In der größtem Zoomstufe der Topokarte sieht man aber, dass die Grenze direkt am Straßenrand verläuft und dass das Sühnekreuz südlich davon (also auf Priesendorfer Gebiet) liegt:

https://geoportal.bayern.de/bayernatlas/?lang=de&topic=ba&catalogNodes=11&bgLayer=tk&E=622896&N=5531477&zoom=15&layers=d0e7d4ea-62d8-46a0-a54a-09654530beed&crosshair=marker

Habe es jetzt in historic=stone, stone_type=conciliation_cross geändert und exakt an die im Denkmalatlas genannte Stelle gesetzt.

Danke für die Hinweise!
Stephan van Helden (2022-06-11 12:12:33+00:00): Die Gemeindegrenze ist übrigens in OSM korrekt eingezeichnet; entspricht exakt der Grenze, wie sie im offiziellen Datensatz "Verwaltungsgrenzen / Gemeinden" eingezeichnet ist. Dieser Verlauf passt aber überhaupt nicht zu den Grenzen der Flurstücke - sieht man schön hier (lila: angebliche Gemeindegrenzen, rot: wohl tatsächliche Gemeindegrenze): https://geoportal.bayern.de/bayernatlas/?lang=de&topic=ba&catalogNodes=11&bgLayer=tk&layers=bf9ff4ed-62c7-4935-9318-d5251108acc3-layer-gemeinden_verwaltungsgemeinschaften_gemeindefreie_gebiete_flaeche&E=622914&N=5531508&zoom=13&crosshair=marker

Ich frag mal meinen Kontakt beim BLfD ...
user_5359 (2022-06-03 06:00:44+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5348766599. What is the meaning of the tag building_maintenance = yes ?
aTarom (2022-06-03 06:04:43+00:00): Hi, to fix key "craft_1"="building_maintenance"
http://servar.es/asistum.php
it's another way?
user_5359 (2022-06-03 06:13:56+00:00): Hello! Maintenance was indeed rarely mentioned. Theoretically, two different values can be listed with semicolons for one key (craft=builder; building_maintaince).
aTarom (2022-06-03 06:18:58+00:00): Not found at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft
searching...
aTarom (2022-06-03 06:20:26+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1iZ8
Perfect you are right, i will change soon, thanks.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-06-21 06:54:25+00:00): Welcome
Why were these ways deleted even though they already exist!
If you deleted it because it is not accessible, you can add a access=* tag on the roads to restrict access to it, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-06-21 06:54:30+00:00): Welcome
Why were these ways deleted even though they already exist!
If you deleted it because it is not accessible, you can add a access=* tag on the roads to restrict access to it, see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-06-21 06:57:08+00:00): Sorry, do you have certain information that this place was demolished within the rehabilitation project of Jeddah?
Bolt019 (2022-06-21 10:57:29+00:00): Hello Abdullah,

Thanks for your time in reviewing the edits made.

Upon realizing that the newly added roads are inside a Military polygon (which we generally don't create inside restricted areas), I have deleted the road created by me, no existing data is modified or deleted.

Your comments are considered on high precedence and will ensure similar errors are not repeated hereafter.

Thanks again and happy Mapping !!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-06-22 17:12:22+00:00): Aha, thanks for the clarification, and thank you very much for your efforts in mapping the missing roads.
Regards
willkmis (2022-06-06 00:38:20+00:00): Hello, this changeset appears to have broken the ordering of the member ways of the bus route relations along Centinela. Please use caution in the future so as to keep the ordering of the ways in the relations correct when splitting road segments.
willkmis (2022-06-06 00:39:52+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121998984
kmarkish_lyft (2022-06-06 11:36:28+00:00): Hello willkmis!
My name is Kate, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Many thanks for paying attention to this and fixing the broken relations order. We have already found the issue thanks to you and we will obligatorily fix it as soon as possible. I apologize for any inconvenience these changes may have caused.  
Best regards, Kate
willkmis (2022-06-06 18:38:04+00:00): Great, thank you for the prompt response!
Allroads (2022-06-02 06:05:44+00:00): Als je er vehicle=no op zet is het gesloten voor alle vervoersvormen behalve foot en horse, dus de fietser kan er niet langs, routering neemt een omweg.
celsius11 (2022-06-02 06:26:07+00:00): It is changed. I hope it will going now.
user_2066394 (2022-06-15 20:14:07+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
Radiumoxid (2022-06-24 07:14:57+00:00): Danke
wireguy (2022-06-06 19:56:56+00:00): bgo_eiu, this change breaks relation 12747684 Ednor Gardens-Lakeside. Hillen Road at East 33rd Street.
wireguy (2022-06-06 20:00:58+00:00): also broken is relation 12772323 Coldstream-Homestead-Montebello. where harford Road ends being dual carriageway
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-06-07 02:26:14+00:00): fixed, thank you
ElliottPlack (2022-06-03 14:25:37+00:00): Please hold off on making these sorts of ramp classification edits. Speaking as DWG here. The convention is that the highest level of classification, ie motorway, is the type of ramp to use. Motorways are special in that they imply limited access, and a multitude of things that other classes do not. Data consumers know this. This is an area that needs more discussion before implementation.
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-03 15:34:38+00:00): Normally, ramps both to and from a higher classification road would get the higher classification.  The usual convention would be that all of the ramps show in this changeset bounding box ought to be motorway_lenth.  At least, that is my recollection of how it works.

Does the wiki say otherwise somewhere?
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-06-03 23:16:19+00:00): I did not intend for these edits to be disruptive and sorry to have caused any confusion. I am not sure where I have misunderstood something or what the "correct" way to map these now; this is not something I came up with but just was doing on the basis of what I read on the wiki and what is done elsewhere on the map in Maryland (various parts of Prince George's County are mapped like this). There is wording on the wiki like "They take the highest classification they go to," which I thought specifically was saying that they belong to the road they connect to rather than come from. I didn't notice this last time I looked, but the two picture examples actually show two different methods of classifying them which seems like a contradiction worth clarifying somehow. 
The one on top shows links classed based on the highest road they come from, the one on the bottom shows them classed based on the highest they go to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link

I was also under the impression that while motorways themselves have access implications, links do not necessarily. The wiki is not clear on this and just says that situations like this are "rare" (rare in Europe I'm guessing) so as far as that goes I would think data consumers would just have to be conservative until there is a clear guideline. These particular ramps do not share the same access restrictions as the motorway, as is evidenced by the cross walks going through them, both on "to" and "from" ramps. If it really is the case that links also imply the same access restrictions, then don't these (and most of Baltimore's) "to" ramps need to be downgraded as well? I'm not actually sure how data consumers would be able to tell for example, that the northbound "to" ramp from Cold Spring  (I actually had a conversation with someone at Baltimore DOT a couple months ago about school zone signage in highway ramps - there's a small possibility there could be more of that in there near future. And a different conversation with someone from at Bowie city govt last year about the sidewalks they're planning on building along some stretches of motorway link once the apartments planned for Melford Blvd are built.)
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-06-03 23:18:11+00:00): Sorry, I didn't finish a sentence. I wish changeset comments could be edited. About the Cold Spring ramp - the northbound one to I 83 which has a sidewalk in it school zone signage in it that I had to walk across and even in to get to school. I don't know where data consumers would be finding out about that stuff, that's still a motorway link because it's a "to" ramp
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-01 05:00:08+00:00): :O

Looks like you dragged a node and a note finally caught it.

Node: 147775677

I've resolved it.
user_2066394 (2022-06-14 22:12:49+00:00): Der Hydrant ist etwas gewandert:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9767329145
Shaun das Schaf (2022-06-01 17:39:38+00:00): Hallo erolfr,

wenn Fahrräder entgegen der Einbahnstraße erlaubt sind, genügt es den Tag "oneway:bicycle=no" hinzuzufügen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:oneway:bicycle

Der Fahrradstreifen kann durch "cycleway=opposite_lane" angegeben werden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite_lane

Ein separater Radweg braucht dann nicht eingezeichnet zu werden.

Ich habe das noch korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
dpolovinkin (2023-10-17 08:16:53+00:00): а подскажите, что за автошкола ТИР которую вы добавили? там есть автошкола Тур, это опечатка? :)
Reisinformatiegroep (2022-06-01 07:29:46+00:00): Hoi Jeroen,
Ik begrijp dat je de gehele set hebt terug gedraaid. In het vervolg gebruik ik naast Id wat voor mij makkelijker werkt dan Josm de pdok viewer er naast want deze is nog duidelijker zie ik.
Sorry voor het verkeerd mappen ik zal in het vervolg beter opletten en vaker de viewer gebruiken.