piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
escada (2020-06-28 18:44:00+00:00): I passed over this road today. The construction works are done. I hope I changed all the tags back to the original (before the change to construction)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:48:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
javbw (2022-07-30 07:39:42+00:00): disconnected footways. needs repair.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:34:35+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
Rogoyski (2021-06-26 12:28:43+00:00): Ten bankomat już był w danych.
mavl (2020-03-01 16:14:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81647490 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3530].
user_5359 (2020-03-01 18:49:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the building http://www.osm.org/way/777237291: Did you mean building:levels=11 instead building:levelsl=11 ?
ma-rt-in (2020-02-29 21:04:28+00:00): Hallo,
du hast in deinem Änderungssatz dem Way 136134802 den Namen entfernt, bitte wieder ergänzen. Des Weiteren bitte ich dich einen passenden Kommentar zu deinen Ännderungen zu hinterlassen. Es ist sinnvoll, da andere dann wissen was und warum du jene Objekte bearbeitet hast.
vg
thal1982 (2020-03-01 05:47:43+00:00): Den Strassennamen hatte ich ausversehen gelöscht, ist wieder hergestellt.
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:34:42+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
olehz (2020-03-24 09:46:09+00:00): от на який біс ти лізиш і ламаєш те, що працює? ЛЕП у львівській області були в ідеально стані ще рык тому - nadoloni.com, нє тре прийти і почати вигадувати свої правила. один видаляє і перемальовує фейки, інший тегування своє вигадує. почитай спершу вікі перед тим як щось "покращувати"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
jawojx (2020-12-29 17:50:40+00:00): To skrzyżowanie ma zła organizację ruchu, te drogi nie są tak podzielone.
voltairovicz (2020-12-29 17:58:38+00:00): Nie rozumiem, co to znaczy "nie są". Które skrzyżowanie?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
Alecs01 (2020-02-29 14:02:31+00:00): Ho fatto il revert di questo changeset. Come ti ho già scritto in privato, non è corretto cancellare le fermate e sostiuirle con delle stazioni perchè si vedano meglio sulla mappa. Inoltre, vengono a mancare quelle fermate dalle relazioni dei percorsi. Non insistere, per favore.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
abakus_uploader (2020-02-29 23:38:21+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2020-02-29 12:34:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Een stukje fietspad heb je op slot gezet voor iedereen met access=no  dat graag weer verwijderen.
In principe nooit met access=no beginnen.
Het gedeelte van de werkzaamheden heb je ook op slot gezet met access=no. Hoe lang gaat dat duren. Wanneer het voor een paar weken is zou ik het niet op slot zetten.
Hoe lang gaat dit duren? 
Wanneer het langdurig is opgebroken kun je het omzetten naar highway=construction construction= residential

Wanneer het langer duurt en gebruik je conditional tags met een tijd.
bv access:conditional=no @ (2020 Jan 20-2020 Apr 3)

Kijk je nog even?
Bv 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-29 12:38:11+00:00): Ik zie dat mapper A67-A67 het al aan het aanpassen is volgens de afspraken binnen OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
GinaroZ (2020-09-22 17:55:00+00:00): Is this still a shop or is it vacant? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4161720029
drnoble (2020-09-24 11:57:16+00:00): From memory, it looked like there might be a shop but it wasn't clear in my photo. I had meant to go back and check but forgot, so have added a note to remind me or others.
mavl (2020-02-29 15:24:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет название "Горький".  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75377845  
  
Это магазин? Нет поясняющего тега.
anpk (2020-02-29 17:13:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это бизнес-центр там офисы.
muramototomoya (2020-03-15 14:18:38+00:00): こんにちは。
この編集でホテルを作成していただいておりますが、データソースを教えていただけませんでしょうか。本日(2020/3/15)に現地に行ったところ、この場所には建物が存在しておりませんでした。他の場所と間違っていないかご確認いただけませんでしょうか。ごく最近の編集であるため、念のため確認させていただきました。
user_2008655 (2020-03-20 08:58:11+00:00): とった
muramototomoya (2020-03-20 13:19:06+00:00): お返事ありがとうございます。
申し訳ありませんが、「とった」というのが何を意味しているのか分かりませんでしたので、追加で説明をお願いできませんでしょうか。

Thanks for your reply.
I'm sorry I couldn't grasp what you said. Could you explain what you mean?
javbw (2022-07-28 13:52:08+00:00): This changeset, like other mapping in the area,  is full of disconnected sidewalks and waterways. they should be connected or deleted. if they are not connected properly, they are useless ways merely decorating the tile renders, but not useful as OSM mapping data. 

I am repairing ways along the levees and a few sidewalks and other major ped footpaths in the area after cycling surveys. the others need repair. refer to Japan GSI layers for proper alignment and Maxar / Bing for new changes.
muramototomoya (2020-03-20 13:16:25+00:00): お返事ありがとうございます。
申し訳ありませんが、「とった」というのが何を意味しているのか分かりませんでしたので、追加で説明をお願いできませんでしょうか。

Thanks for your reply.
I'm sorry I couldn't grasp what you said. Could you explain what you mean?
muramototomoya (2020-03-20 13:18:34+00:00): I'm sorry I posted to wrong changeset. Ignore this.
user_2008655 (2020-03-20 14:16:05+00:00): Well, just ignore me, of course buildings near the re-opened Futaba station need more eyes from residents. The roads maybe ditto, as just looked up informations from METI: https://www.meti.go.jp/earthquake/nuclear/kinkyu/hinanshiji/2020/20200310.html
muramototomoya (2020-03-20 14:31:07+00:00): OK I would modify them.
By the way if you referred to METI documents, please write it to "source" tag. And please confirm those documents are available for OSM.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-07-13 16:10:52+00:00): hello, can you explain why you added on "name=North Sea / Nordsee / Noordzee / Nordsøen / Nordsjøen / Mer du Nord" when there's name:* in multiple languages? or alt_names.
Florimondable (2025-07-18 20:20:32+00:00): Hi, its the names of the North Sea.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-07-18 20:35:06+00:00): @florimondable on the same tag separated by "|" instead of separating them by language tag?
Florimondable (2025-07-19 19:21:02+00:00): Like in Belgium or Switzerland, Moroco, Algeria...
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2025-07-19 20:49:37+00:00): no sense at all your reply.
Koen VO (2020-03-07 20:15:43+00:00): Sinds wanneer is deze weg verboden toegang? Ik zie geen verbodsbord ter plaatse, dus volgens beheerplan Meerdaalwoud toegelaten.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-03-08 12:05:35+00:00): Oeps, ik had het foute paadje vast, ik heb het ongedaan gemaakt
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-29 12:46:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 81603742, 81603827, 81603989, 81604063, 81604087, 81604108, 81604327, 81604686, 81606005, 81606103, 81606126, 81606237, 81606753, 81606786, 81606827, 81607043, 81607050, 81607157, 81607212, 81610353, 81610363, 81610368.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-29 13:29:34+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81619543 and subsequent changes for manual fixes to some of the issues.
gormur (2020-03-09 23:49:09+00:00): Hei peet192
Ser du har slettet det midlertidige bybane-depotet. Men kan det hende at deler av gamle vossebanen også forsvant i dragsuget? Er skinnene fjernet fullstendig? De er mange som ville foretrukket å beholde litt jernbanehistorie og dermed heller byttet tagging til railway=disused/abandoned/razed.
Artiklene om nedlagte jernbaner i wikipedia bruker f.eks disse dataene.
abrensch (2020-03-01 08:46:33+00:00): Hallo Lokalfürst,

ich habe diesen Änderungssatz hier revertiert.

Du hast mal wieder Einbahnstrassen umgedreht.

Wolltest Du nicht schauen, welche Knöpfe Du in Vesprucci besser nicht drückst?

Gruss, Arndt
rab (2020-03-01 10:33:44+00:00): Hallo Lokalfürst, source_maxspeed könnte ich für dich hier ja generell vereinheitlichen. Laut Wiki müsste aber "source:maxspeed=sign" richtig sein.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
Lokalfuerst (2020-06-16 06:23:46+00:00): Arndt,
a)  Danke fuer die Korrektur re Einbahnstrassen !

b)  Was den tag source_maxspeed=sign alt. traffic-sign angeht, hatte ich auch recherchiert und gelesen, dass von einigen Mappern die kurze Version sign verwendet und empfohlen wird; nicht zwingend. Sign als kuerzere Version waere mir von der Syntax her sympatischer als traffic_sign. Hatte mich aber fuer traffic_sign entschieden, denn man koennte z.B. ein grosses Reklame-Schild oder aehnliches als sign deklarieren und solche, die mit dem traffic zu tun haben als traffic_sign. Das war der Grund fuer meine Entscheidung. Ich bin bis heute unschluessig, halte mich aber selbstverstaendlich an den allgemeinen Konsens. 
  Wenn die Moeglichkeit besteht, meine diesbezueglichen Eintraege zu vereinheitlichen, halte ich es fuer gut das zu machen.
Viele Gruesse
Gruss Lokalfuerst
Kovoschiz (2020-02-29 20:19:36+00:00): Hello，個水壩嘅數據已經有，睇唔到應該係Maps.me個apps問題？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81619852
Kovoschiz (2020-02-29 20:22:12+00:00): 我睇到個名有出喺條界到
eggie (2020-02-29 16:22:24+00:00): Hi .. I merged the info with official addressnode.
Eggie
mueschel (2020-03-07 19:23:27+00:00): Hi,
please explain these edits:

- what is the meaning of the ares? All don't have any meaningful tag
- what it the source of all this? This is important for legal reasons
- what is the purpose of this import?
- where was the import discussed and documented?
ParadoX_ZLWC (2020-03-16 00:28:30+00:00): 请不要抄袭有版权的地图，请认真阅读FAQ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ

（即使是抄了也别这么说出来啊
allen_dema (2020-02-29 14:05:24+00:00): Ich habe Wikis, Öffnungszeiten, addresen, Bezahl möglichkeiten und andere Kleinigkeiten hinzugefügt.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2020-05-12 22:12:09+00:00): Hvor kommer de 40 km/h Gammel Bregnerødvej fra?

Der er nu masser af Mapillary billeder.
Men jeg kan stadig ikke se nogen skilte.
Tntdruid (2020-05-13 05:27:38+00:00): Der er et skilt med det.

Mapillary er outdated.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2020-05-13 08:58:43+00:00): Du satte 40 km/h 30 august 2019.

Furesøs 360 graders mapillary billeder er fra 25. juli 2019 og 6 marts 2020.

Så Mapillary er ikke outdated. Har de sat et skilt op og pillet det ned nogle måneder efter?
Tntdruid (2020-05-13 10:06:27+00:00): Jeg kikker næste gange jeg kommer forbi der.
maraf24 (2020-03-11 22:32:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2714918392 has wheelchair=designated
but the only entrance https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7252846614 has wheelchair=no.
It's a little confusing.
CRCulver (2020-03-12 05:54:21+00:00): The main entrance is at the top of stairs without a wheelchair ramp. Therefore, I tagged it wheelchair=no.

However, the POI in general is wheelchair-accessible: at the foot of those stairs is a button with a wheelchair symbol that disabled visitors can press. I assume that they are then shown to an alternative entrance=yes somewhere else in the building, or staff come out of the building to serve them outside.

This same setup is found on many government buildings in Poland, I find it often on village post offices.
mavl (2020-03-01 04:22:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81635033 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3527].
trigpoint (2020-03-15 20:30:12+00:00): Hi, why have you added an embankment here?

Have you been here and observed this embankment as there are no embankments shown on the photo on wikipedia?

Also it seems rather strange to add the place name in brackets, we can work that out from the location.

Also not from your edit but the name should be Meini Hirion or tall stones in English.
Reino Baptista (2020-03-16 11:29:17+00:00): Dear Phil,
Please feel free to correct the name.

About the embankment
1. At the present there is no way to represent the specific format of a stone circle on OSM.
2. Some ancient maps represent stone circles with the same representation as OSM uses for embankment.
3. An embankment is also a disturbance on the the ground resulting from men interference.
4. The embankment is tagged on a different way then the stone circle.
5. I know this is as workaround, but is real close to the true on the ground and a good representation of the area covered by the stone circle, otherwise not existent.
6. If you don't feel comfortable with this explanation I will gladly remove the embankment.
RR
SomeoneElse (2020-02-29 22:21:39+00:00): Account for this should have been "SomeoneElse" not "SomeoneElse_Revert"
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:34:49+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-08-08 22:04:20+00:00): voce quebrou as estradas aqui nessa regiao em dezenas de pedaços, pq fez isso? dificulta muito a edição...
maraf24 (2020-03-12 08:27:21+00:00): Tu nie ma jednostki wojskowej.
*abq* (2020-06-05 10:51:29+00:00): Hallo Winfried, 
hast du die Wege, die du im Grätlewald eingetragen hast, überprüft (inklusive der eingetragenen Wegeigenschaften) oder ist das wieder nur eine Kopie von Maps4BW (so sieht es nämlich aus). 
Falls nicht, lösche sie bitte wieder umgehend.
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2020-11-22 19:37:35+00:00): Dzień dobry Artur525,
Czy zmiana budynku nr 98 na szkołę to przypadkiem nie jakaś pomyłka? Znam dobrze te tereny i wydaje mi się, że tam szkoły nie ma.
trigpoint (2020-03-15 20:53:45+00:00): What sources have you used here, what evidence is there that there is an embankment here. It would be a very unusual thing to find around a stone circle afterall.

Cheers Phil
Reino Baptista (2020-03-16 11:18:21+00:00): Dear Phil,
1. At the present there is no way to represent the specific format of a stone circle on OSM.
2. Some ancient maps represent stone circles with the same representation as OSM uses for embankment.
3. An embankment is also a disturbance on the the ground resulting from men interference.
4. The embankment is tagged on a different way then the stone circle.
5. I know this is as workaround, but is real close to the true on the ground  and a good representation of the area covered by the stone circle, otherwise not existent.
6. If you don't feel comfortable with this explanation I will gladly remove the embankment.
RR
trigpoint (2020-03-16 12:53:20+00:00): Reino
What you are describing is (mis)tagging for the renderer, which is an absolute no no in OSM. Please stop doing this.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

OSM is primarily a geographical database and your explaination is at best only true of the default renderer.

Mapping features such as this is best done by a survey, they are often indistinct and are certainly not something that can be armchaired from aerial imagery.

Also why do you assume what is inside the stone circle is different to that surounding it?

Cheers Phil
Reino Baptista (2020-03-16 13:46:11+00:00): OK
Nakaner (2020-08-31 12:09:56+00:00): Hallo,

der ICAO-Code ist nicht Teil des Namens eines Flughafens. Ich habe ihn daher wieder aus dem Namen entfernt. Der ICAO-Code war und ist mit icao=EDRF erfasst.

Könntest du bitte bei künftigen Änderungssätzen beim Hochladen einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar angeben? Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:34:56+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 14:01:30+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:35:03+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
olo81 (2020-07-25 11:11:20+00:00): Nie nazywamy dróg dojazdowych. Tak jak pisze w wiki nazywamy tylko te drogi które mają nazwę:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
gendy54 (2020-04-25 22:46:40+00:00): Bonjour Philomene,

Je me permets juste une petite remarque. Pense à mieux décrire les changements que tu fais: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Philomene (2020-04-26 07:29:23+00:00): Que dire d'autre? 
J'ai ajouté ça en février 2020 en passant devant, il n'y avait rien sur la carte.
Il faut dire quoi dans ce cas là?
gendy54 (2020-04-26 16:35:36+00:00): Je ne parlais de ce changement là en particulier, mais des autres également qui ont tous le même descriptif.
Par exemple: "Not in the map and revision with the cadastre and BD Ortho IGN" ou "ajout Feb 2020", ca n'apporte pas d'informations sur ce que tu as modifié.
Regarde le lien que je t'ai envoyé, il y a toutes les réponses.
A ta dispo si besoin ;)

Donat, alias gendy54
Philomene (2020-04-26 16:58:33+00:00): Merci de répondre à ma question.
Il  n'y a rien dans le lien que tu m'as donné à part "Un bon commentaire de groupe de modifications doit décrire de façon concise et adéquate une révision. Vous devriez le faire par courtoisie envers vos collègues cartographes, pour éviter les malentendus et corriger rapidement les erreurs. Cela rend vos éditions plus précieuses. Cela peut même vous aider lorsque vous repenserez à vos éditions à l'avenir. "
Je n'apporte AUCUNE modification. J'ajoute des éléments (point d'eau, commerce qui ne sont pas indiqué, et qui peuvent aussi changer) 
Donc non désolée, je ne vois pas ce que j'aurais du indiquer.

Et tu ne me le dis pas non plus....
Philomene (2020-04-26 17:13:40+00:00): "Not in the map" ça pourrait être bien , mais ce n'est pas forcément vrai : 
Parfois certains magasins se sont transformés, d'autres n'existaient pas....
Donc je repose ma question : comment dois-je commenter mes ajouts que je fais par groupe?
gendy54 (2020-04-26 17:47:23+00:00): Sur OSM, quand on parle de modifications, il s'agit de modification de la base OSM, que ce soit en ajoutant, en modifiant, ou en supprimant des objets.
Je pense que tu n'as pas vu le lien vers l'article principal où tu as des exemples: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Je pense que ce sera plus clair ;)
Philomene (2020-04-26 18:07:03+00:00): Yeapp
Mais le problème c'est que ce sont vraiment des commentaires fait pour des gens qui travaillent sur des datas (cadastres ou autre) ou sur un endroit précis.
Donc j'explique ma situation et tu me donnes la réponse : 
Je roule toute la journée en vélo. 
Je prends le temps de m'arreter pour noter sur mon appli téléphone ce qu'il faut ajouter/ corriger (parce que voyageant à vélo je sais combien c'est utile ) 
Je m'arrete le soir, j'envoie tout en une seule fois (je rappelle que je suis sous la tente en itinérance avec une connexion à pédale, donc pas le temps ni la possibilité de faire 50 envois) 
JE DOIS METTRE QUOI?
et promis la prochaine je le fais, mais juste là je ne vois pas....
gendy54 (2020-04-26 18:16:20+00:00): Effectivement, la situation est un peu complexe, mais la réponse sera plus facile. Je mettrais quelque chose comme: "Ajout des différents POI collectés en rando-vélo dans la journée".
C'est sûr que si tu ne fais pas de modifications homogènes (en terme de données et/ou d'emprise géo), je comprends que ce soit + difficile à conceptualiser.
Ne t'inquiète pas pour ce qui a été fait, c'est juste dans une perspective d'amélioration. Moi aussi ca m'arrive d'envoyer un changeset avec des mauvaises indications ;)

Bon voyage à vélo alors et merci pour toutes ces modifs pour les cyclistes.
Philomene (2020-04-26 18:19:19+00:00): Merci! Je note soigneusement et dès que je peux repartir sur mon vélo je ferais mes ajouts avec ce commentaire :D