piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2022-10-24 19:44:24+00:00): Z tej dopravnej znacky Cesta pre motorove vozidla vyplyvaju zo zakona nejake obmedzenia tak je potrebne to oznacit. Myslim, ze osadenim tej znacky spravca cesty rozhodol, ze je to "high performance or high importance road" a predpokladam, ze musi splnat nejake parametre kedze napr. "musi byt mozne ist na rovine minimalne 60km/h", takze lubovolnu pochybnu cestu tym asi oznacit nejde.

Ano momentalne CPMV znacime highway=trunk+motorroad=yes (pre vyjadrenie obmedzeneho pristupu pre inych ucastnikov). Je to tak aj na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk , aj ked mozno este z minulosti (kedze vyznam znacky sa v zakone parkrat menil). Ak mate iny navrh skusme to prebrat na fore, kedze takych ciest je viac.
Carto_Graph (2022-10-24 20:49:19+00:00): Дороги куда-то исчезли?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-24 09:27:14+00:00): Hi, welcome!

Just a test edit?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
adiatmad (2022-10-24 09:31:10+00:00): Your edits look great. But it will be better to avoid adding a generic name i.e name=Building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106508994) & (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106508993). Maybe you want to check this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
mego_map (2022-10-24 07:11:42+00:00): Hello osamafayek;
I noticed you edited some streets in the old satellite images like "Bing aerial imagery" and "Maxar Premium Imagery" which is the most updated.
This led to you deleting some links and aligning ways in the old images, also you  moved a node away in "Al Fath Street" which made a way sharp angle in the streets
could you recheck this area and fix these issues?
Link for the node you moved far away :
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/7575422032
Link for the street you removed:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1102798873
Regards
mego_map
tsp15 (2022-10-31 17:17:57+00:00): Nie dodawaj śluz rowerowych, w miejscach których ich nie ma.
tastrax (2022-11-20 03:35:43+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
rhtb0 (2022-10-24 09:06:51+00:00): 여기는 진짜 공원도 아닌데 공원이 맞나요? 그냥 사유지입니다.
rhtb0 (2022-10-24 09:18:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124676235
사유지를 공원으로 표기하면 어떤 방문객이 계속 와서 안전상의 문제가 있고 도난이 한 건 더 발생했고 최근 방문객이 이 지도를 보고 온 사례가 있습니다.
rhtb0 (2022-10-24 09:19:12+00:00): 지도에도 존재하지 않습니다.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-24 11:06:13+00:00): Change reverted. Please do not change classification without local knowledge.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Langlaeufer (2022-10-24 09:39:17+00:00): Wenn ich das richtig sehe, hast du die alte Brücke wieder eingezeichnet. Ich habe jetzt anhand der neueren Luftbilder die neue Brücke eingezeichnet. Der Tracktype der neuen Wegeanschlüsse müsste noch nachgetragen werden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127982193
Langlaeufer (2022-10-24 10:33:53+00:00): By Langlaeufer
about 1 hour ago
Hier nochmal zur Verifikation: Das ist die neue Brücke https://www.geobasis.niedersachsen.de/?x=9.9401&y=52.2147&z=14&m=lglnDop
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127982193
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-24 09:26:24+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127987451
Supaplex (2022-10-25 06:15:51+00:00): 請用測試站 https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
OpenStreetMap 是不少大網站如 Facebook、Apple、Mapbox 在使用，請依據現況繪製
dadavid (2023-03-30 13:24:37+00:00): Hallo, 
du hast hier aus der DB Lounge, die als Cafe getaggt war (amenity=cafe) einen Unterstand/Wartehäuschen) gemacht (amenity=shelter, shelter_type=public_transport). 
Die anderen DB-Lounges in Deutschland sind auch als Cafes getaggt, und ich denke das hat so auch seine Richtigkeit, denn aufgrund der Bewirtung etc haben sie ja eher Cafe- als Wartehäuschencharakter, hier lohnt auch wieder ein Blick ins wiki ;)
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1t8g
Gibt es etwas, was die Nürnberger DB-Lounge da unterscheidet oder findest du das Tagging generell besser? Starte dazu gerne eine Diskussion im Forum! 
Um aber bei einem einheitlichen Tagging zu bleiben würde ich dein Changeset vorerst zurücksetzen; wenn es im Forum einen neuen Konsens gibt können wir das gern wieder anpassen :) 
Liebe Grüße
Langlaeufer (2022-10-24 09:40:24+00:00): Hier nochmal zur Verifikation: Das ist die neue Brücke
https://www.geobasis.niedersachsen.de/?x=9.9401&y=52.2147&z=14&m=lglnDop
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127982487
Langlaeufer (2022-10-24 10:33:45+00:00): sorry, der Kommentar war für die andere Brücke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127982487
ivanbranco (2022-10-27 18:49:39+00:00): Ciao Juliana,

il tag wikipedia mi sembrava corretto prima.

Inoltre qual è il significato di questi tag?
operator=Juliana 20tab
operator:en=Matteo 20tab
operator:wikidata=Paolo 20tab
MarcoR (2022-11-23 17:57:47+00:00): Ho corretto il valore del tag wikipedia con changeset 129291922 .
Buon mapping,
Marco.
HellMap (2022-10-24 10:44:41+00:00): Hi! I'm pretty sure the intention of `country=lv` was to specify which country's flag is on the flagpole. And this does in fact appear to be the correct tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dflagpole#Tags_to_use_in_combination; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:country). Regardless, flagpoles don't have addresses, so this correction is wrong. I notice you have made other similar corrections like this, for example this consulate (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10058957494/history), which is just completely wrong as you merged represented country with the address. Please review all your recent country tag corrections.
HellMap (2022-10-26 10:32:31+00:00): Hello? Are you going to fix your edits?
HellMap (2022-10-29 09:31:49+00:00): Since you are not replying but still actively editing, I have reverted this changeset.
nevw (2022-10-24 07:46:04+00:00): Hi, this is a public map. It seems likely you are mapping personal detail pertaining to GG on the map. Should I delete it?
nevw (2022-10-24 14:50:20+00:00): I have reverted as I expect these are just personal edits which don’t belong on a public map.
ivanbranco (2022-10-27 18:46:46+00:00): Ciao poporni,

non sono sicuro questa modifica sia corretta. I tag type=restriction si usano nelle relazioni solitamente, non nelle way. 

Penso si debba usare qualcosa del tipo motor_vehicle:conditional=* invece di restriction:conditional
PT-53 (2022-10-24 08:32:24+00:00): Hallo SirEdward,
diese Eingaben sehen sehr nach Spaß-Eingaben aus. Ich habe diese daher wieder zurückgesetzt.
Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
SirEdward (2022-10-25 20:01:16+00:00): Hey nein meine Freundin wohnt in der 32 und hat 2 in den Boden eingesetzte Pools .. würde deshalb um das hinzufügen der Gewässer im Sinne der Map bitten.
PT-53 (2022-10-26 06:27:06+00:00): Hallo SirEdward, 
ich bin gegen die Erfassung von privaten Pools (Privatsphäre !).
Grüße
osmviborg (2022-10-24 08:00:10+00:00): Når du tegner en vej/track gennem en gårdsplads, så del vejen op, og tag stykket over gårdspladsen 'access=private'.
aceman444 (2022-11-13 23:55:09+00:00): Absolutely wrong fix! 'country' tag was correct for embassy/consulate, but probably needed to contain CF for Central Africa.
"addr:country" is address of the house, not of the diplomats source country. "DE;CF" for address of the house looks like nonsense.
highflyer74 (2022-11-14 05:59:18+00:00): Another map roulette challenge gone wrong? This needs to be stopped I guess.

@googlenaut: schau dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:country an. Für diplomatische Vertretungen ist country=* korrekt.
HellMap (2022-11-15 12:50:57+00:00): For info, I mentioned this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127982997 to no response. Most of the changes in this #countryTag batch were incorrect.
highflyer74 (2022-11-15 13:00:16+00:00): Thanks for the info. I'll send a PM in German language according to the users locale settings and try to trigger a response.
highflyer74 (2022-11-15 13:06:19+00:00): Oh, I just realised: a 0 hour block was issued already, so he/she should be aware. As the block ended a couple of days ago, I hope the user will show some kind of reaction.

Apart from that: does anyone know if the relevant MapRoulette challenge is still active? I am not too familiar with MR.
googlenaut (2022-11-18 08:27:15+00:00): there were some issues on tagging flagpoles in front of embassies. the MR challenge demand to change their country values into ISO 3166-1 alpha 2 code. I thought this demand was proven before putting it into a challenge. Sorry for this.
aceman444 (2022-11-18 08:42:22+00:00): googlenaut, this is nothing about flagpoles. ISO 3166-1 alpha 2 is correct for 'country' tag so why have you removed it here and converted to non-sense "addr:country"?
You answer does in no way relate to the posted question.
googlenaut (2022-11-29 12:39:07+00:00): ok, no flagpoles here, but there were some in other countrys. wonder why its so important, cause embassy is disused anyway.
HellMap (2022-12-01 14:35:14+00:00): It's important because there remain almost 40 other edits from the same 
batch that had incorrect changes. And even after a month and multiple messages, you still have not fixed them.
googlenaut (2022-12-05 09:49:41+00:00): unable to pick 40 edits among 22.700 others.
silversurfer83 (2023-05-27 08:08:38+00:00): Maybe you work too fast?
Most of the tools like osmose or maproulette rely on autmated results to show "errors". But these errors all have to be checked manually and your speed is rather high. Maybe slow down a bit and check each change thoroughly. 

And please react to comments. They are an important part of quality control at OSM.
divulmappeur (2024-01-27 11:43:34+00:00): Merci pour cette contribution insolite. Je fais des recherches concernant la présence de cette voie ferrée à cet endroit, avez-vous par hasard des informations à ce sujet ?
Merci
milet (2022-11-01 12:31:03+00:00): Hallo,
du hast mit dieser Änderung "access=no" an der Straße ergänzt. Das würde alle nicht explizit freigegebenen Fahrzeugarten verbieten (also auch Busse, LKWs, usw.) und ist so natürlich nicht korrekt. Ich habe deshalb die Änderungen wieder rückgängig gemacht.
Mehr zum Thema "access-Regeln" kann man z.B. im Wiki nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access?uselang=de
Gott liebt Sie! God loves you! (2022-11-01 14:58:26+00:00): Guten tag,
vielen Dank für Ihren Hinweis.
Nun, wenn ich "Motorfahrzeuge" auf "yes" stelle, impliziert dies meines Verständnisses nach auch die von Ihnen genannten Fahrzeugarten. Also ist für mich logisch, dass ich "Alle" auf "no" stelle und "Motorfahrzeuge" auf "yes". Was sagen Sie dazu?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Moritz Vonier
traveleditor (2022-10-24 08:19:02+00:00): Thank you for your hard work!
NorthCrab (2023-01-08 09:13:20+00:00): Proszę nie używaj polskich wartości jak "asfalt"
532910 (2023-10-08 13:45:33+00:00): откуда инфа что 8752560908 это Шаверлэнд?
kate_rocketdata (2023-10-09 06:47:03+00:00): Добрый день!
По информации от компании Шавэрлэнд 12 месяцев назад по данному адресу была точка продаж Шаверлэнд.
532910 (2023-10-31 15:19:04+00:00): Так, и что?
Допустим это правда: по данному адресу была компании Шавэрлэнд. Это что, повод удалить другую компанию?
532910 (2023-10-31 15:20:13+00:00): Будте добры, проверьте все ваши остальные правки, где вы удаляете или изменяете существующие компании подобным образом.
kate_rocketdata (2023-11-01 08:27:40+00:00): Добрый день!
По данной точке 8752560908 - это был ребрендинг компании Евро Кебаб, который мы изменили на Шаверлэнд.
Помогите разобраться,что вы имеете в виду под удалением другой компании?
Karthoo (2022-10-30 06:02:03+00:00): Thanks for cleaning up! Unfortunately these edits made it into my OsmAnd data and led me into a dead end...
nikospag (2022-10-31 15:24:00+00:00): Thanks for your nice comment :)
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Stalker61 (2022-10-24 08:32:20+00:00): Вот скажи мне честно.
Нафига курочить замапленный по bing-у НП по кривому maxar-у. Все объекты вылизаны с привязками уже до тебя.
Stalker61 (2022-10-24 08:33:13+00:00): Есть обновления, добавляй с учетом уже имеющихся данных.
desk77 (2022-10-25 03:17:35+00:00): Эти объекты уже отсутствуют в этой местности. Зачем их оставлять?
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-25 05:57:44+00:00): Žemėnaudos nereikia bandyti braižyti pagal vaizdelį ar tai, kur pagal kelių metų senumo nuotrauką buvo pasukęs traktorius :-) Tai visi išsikišimai, užlankstymai ir pan. yra ne tik nereikalingi, bet jie ir blogis. Prie Slabados išvaliau žemėnaudos duomenis. Šiaip klausimas, kiek naudingi yra visi mikro juostelių sužymėjimai, tai tik spėjimas iš ortonuotraukos, žemėlapyje prideda tik triukšmą. Nors dėl jų kategoriškai negaliu sakyti, ten jau skonio reikalas.
DaanLT (2022-10-25 06:46:51+00:00): Na taip gražiau atrodo :)
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-25 07:09:15+00:00): Čia kaip kam :-) Jei žiūrėsim iš kartografinės pusės, tai pikselių makalynė yra didžiausias blogis - ji nesugeba iškomunikuoti absoliučiai jokių žinių žemėlapio naudotojui. Jei kažkas nori pikselių faršo - jungiasi ortofoto ir džiaugiasi. O žemėlapio paskirtis yra perduoti vieną ar kitą informaciją.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-25 07:10:49+00:00): Tuo labiau, kad nesikeičia ten tose vietose žemėnauda kas metus priklausomai nuo to, pravažiavo traktorius ar nepravažiavo ir kur pravažiavo ;-)
DaanLT (2022-10-25 08:12:35+00:00): na jo nesikeičia kas met, pasistengsiu nesmulkinti labai, dėsiu pagal tai ko daugiau aplink yra :)
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
user_5359 (2022-10-24 11:42:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2022-10-24 09:21:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback 'k Zie dat je het al aangepast heeft aan de juiste format voor construction...  Het lijkt me oke zo.

Wanneer er nog helemaal niets te zien is kun je ook highway=proposed met proposed=path gebruiken.
Je het de straatnamen aangepast. Neem aan dat je een goede bron hebt gebruikt. De voorgaande mapper A67 A67 is wel een ervaren infrastructuurmapper. Ik weet niet wat zijn bron was? 

Op de kruising Bosanemoon -Kamperfoelie liggen een stukje de wegen op elkaar geplakt. Dat routeert niet goed straks.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-24 09:23:28+00:00): Hier is iets fout gegaan.  Je Kamperfoelie loopt verder de hoek om over de Bosanemoon.
eggie (2022-10-24 09:23:48+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127985539
eggie (2022-10-24 09:30:13+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan.. Sept 2022
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=24-10-2021&loc=51.41275%2C5.375501%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-10-09&acqid=20221009_105653_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1

Wanneer er daadwerkelijk gebouwd wordt kun je vast import van woningen en adressen aanvragen op het 'nieuwe'forum van OSM in het draadje BAG import verzoeken.
Anders is het wachten op periodieke import. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43


Mapse
eggie
andyonthewings (2022-10-25 10:47:49+00:00): 天唐背包 is no longer in business, that's why I prefixed "disused:" to the 
"tourism" tag.
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
johantiden (2022-10-26 09:46:49+00:00): Hej!

Den här landuse=residential har gått sönder:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14725396

Det saknas gräns på västra sidan
eggie (2022-10-24 09:36:00+00:00): Spelling Koekoeksbloem klopt niet
conform de data van de BAG
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Wilgenroosje%20veld&resultOffset=0&objectId=0861100000431176&geometry.x=154081.17501538&geometry.y=380245.90601411&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0861010000431178
eggie (2022-10-24 10:44:04+00:00): Spelling aangepast... Duplicated way verwijderd
johantiden (2022-10-26 09:41:57+00:00): Hej! 

Du har lagt till en parkering (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106527289) fast det redan fanns en parkering där (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490164085). 

Du har också taggat en nod i hörntet som parkering (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4823441239)
eggie (2022-10-24 09:41:02+00:00): Even als voorbeeld BAG import aangevraagd
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/104
groet
eggie
johantiden (2022-10-26 09:51:48+00:00): Hej!

Här överlappar två gångvägar varandra:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/818508724
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/818508733#map=19/59.33862/18.25285
TheRealBatch_PostNord (2022-10-27 06:47:34+00:00): Hej!

Redigerade annat i området men inga stigar vad jag kommer ihåg. 
Jag har åtgärdat felet nu.
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-10-24 13:29:24+00:00): Hallo jannisbingobär123 und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Vielen Dank für Deine Eintragung! Es würde mich freuen noch weitere Beiträge von Dir zu sehen. Gerade im Heidekreis wird jede Unterstützung gebraucht!

Ein kleiner Fehler ist aber in Deiner Eintragung: Kirchboitzen hat keine Straße die "Kirchboitzen" heißt. Weil die Postanschrift sich aus Ortsname und Hausnummer zusammensetzt, wird auch kein Straßenname bei der Adresse eingetragen. Dafür gibt es den Tag "addr:place=Kirchboitzen". Leider zeigt der Onlineeditor iD diesen Eintrag nicht in seiner Eingabemaske an. Das muss man weiter unten unter "Eigenschaften" per Hand hinzufügen.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-10-24 13:30:38+00:00): P.S.: Habe ich jetzt korrigiert.
audtr (2023-06-29 13:25:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3756626
tntchn (2022-10-24 09:07:25+00:00): 非匯入資料，原有的路徑是來自 changeset(46715417) 的舊資料，該區域已於2020年由海洋委員會公告。其東界為距離海岸線50公尺處，因為海洋委員會原有的海岸線圖資品質不穩定，而且海岸線是經常變動的資訊所以只是參考海洋保育地理資訊圖台的資料大約繪製，而不使用匯入的資料（其實我也沒找到opendata能夠匯入）
maro21 (2022-10-29 14:14:49+00:00): Czyli te adresy z literami nie są używane w tym bloku?
Jesli tak, to powinno być na adresie source:addr=survey, bo takiego adresu nie ma w źródle, które podałeś.
Dawid2849 (2022-10-29 14:35:07+00:00): Ja zamiast disused:add: bym dał raczej old_addr:, choć być może jest to błędne.
Mordechai23 (2022-11-02 09:36:53+00:00): tak, powinienem był zmienić source po zrobieniu ctrl+c ctrl+v ;) poprawiłem na survey
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-19 18:34:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130460516/history has access:psv = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using psv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/psv/&***/access%3Apsv/
Belseybob (2022-10-26 09:18:34+00:00): Thank you - I can't argue with any of that. And thank you for alerting me to Map The Paths. I'm already using StreetComplete and Vespucci while out and about. Now I will have another way to annoy my wife while walking....
gurglypipe (2022-10-26 09:35:09+00:00): No worries. Note that you can get the MapThePaths overlays directly in the ID editor by enabling ‘Public Rights of Way’ in the ‘Background Settings’ pane, if that helps.

It’s good to have hobbies! Happy mapping :)
ivanbranco (2022-10-27 18:34:49+00:00): Ciao Roberto, benvenuto su OSM!

Ora però c'è un nodo chiamato Hotel Edelweis dentro ad un edificio chiamato Hotel Edelweiss. L'albergo occupa l'intero edificio? In tal caso possiamo spostare i tag sull'edificio e lasciare il nodo solo per l'indiriizzo.

Buon mapping :)
Roberto1985 (2022-10-28 12:10:38+00:00): Ciao, si, l'Hotel occupa tutto l'edificio.
Ti ringrazio della precisazione, purtroppo non sono ancora in grado di fare queste modifiche
ivanbranco (2022-10-28 14:29:53+00:00): Grazie della risposta ho sistemato :)
bxl-forever (2022-10-24 13:02:18+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for having surveyed it.
Until this weekend, there were rumours that this part of the new traffic scheme would be postponed.
It’s good that the new traffic signs are there.
(I was about to go there to survey it today or tomorrow, but since you did it, it will save me time.)
0xc4 (2022-10-24 13:15:26+00:00): Hi :)
I did not survey it, i followed the announces from the press and the commune from this morning so if you are in the area, it might still be a good idea to double check 👍
0xc4 (2022-10-24 13:17:23+00:00): No need in the end, signs and paint are indeed there 🥳
https://twitter.com/Lanomadesed/status/1583096165108588544