piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vorpalblade-kaart (2019-07-05 14:22:47+00:00): > Greek translations are useless, since the local name is already greek.

I did not translate the name tag to Greek. I copied the name tag to the name:el tag, but only if there was a name:* tag as well. (I initially did this regardless of a name:* tag, but I felt that was too much data churn).

> Please use nothing more than what you see on street signs, which is
> Prefix=*
> name=*
> int_name=*

That is exactly what I did. I didn't add prefix=* (is that even an accepted tag?), but I did add name=name:el=<Greek name on sign> and int_name=<Non-Greek name on sign> (name:el was usually only added when there was another name:* tag on the object).


Here is why I added name:el tags that were the same as name tags:

I add name:el tags partly as a hint to the data consumer (in Greece, I could probably get away with not adding that tag, since they use the Greek alphabet, which looks nothing like Latin characters), but I do consider it best practice, when a name:* tag exists, to make certain that the data consumer knows what language the "name" key is in. It also ensures that if someone comes in and "translates" the name tag (e.g., "Οδός" -> "Street"), the name:el tag will still exist and be used until someone comes along and fixes the translation changeset.

For the record, I used https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization when using this tagging scheme. In the example, they had the default name as "name" and then the same name in "name:de" (since this is on the sign, it is still valid). This strongly implied (to me) that when a name:* exists, the name value should also exist on one of the name:* tags. In Greece, this was name:el.

Furthermore, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Greece follows the same general scheme, which indicated that name:el was optional. At the time I wrote this reply, the naming convention was:

    name=* and (optionally) name:el=* name in Greek ("Οδός" is omitted) e.g., "Σταδίου", "Ελευθερίου Βενιζέλου".

    int_name=* transcribed name e.g., "Stadiou", "Εleftheriou Venizelou", "Plateia Eleftherias", (ISO 843).

    name:en=* (optional): translation of the property only. (names must not be translated) eg. "Πλατεία Ελευθερίας" is translated to "Eleftherias square" and not "Freedom square".

    old_name=* (optional): old Greek name; e.g., "Πανεπιστημίου".

In short, if you do not like the tagging scheme I used (where I added name:el tags when a name:* existed), please change/clarify the wiki.

If it helps, I just went through the all of the ways that I modified in this changeset, and someone came in after me and changed many of the name:* to int_name (most of the name:* were name:fr tags, and I don't read French, which is why I didn't touch them). The name:el tags are still valid, so I am not going to remove them, but I wouldn't have added them if I knew for certain that the name:fr tags were really int_name tags. I would have just changed the name:fr to int_name.
TZorn (2018-11-14 12:13:25+00:00): Hi glimap, you have mapped the new service road on top of the existing footway. Now there are two ways in the same place. The right approach would have been to split the existing way and turn the Northern section into a highway=service. Please correct your edit in that respect.

I also encourage you to make adgustments to the geometry in line with the surrounding. You seem to have shifted some nodes based on the Bing aerial while the reminder of the surrounding was based on a better aligned image (e. g. Esri). The ways are now mispositioned in respect to the other ways and buildings.
tux67 (2018-11-14 09:15:45+00:00): turnining this footway into a highway=service would mean this can be accessed by cars and other motor vehicles. Looking at your mapping pattern it looks like you are only doing armchair mapping bases on sat images. If this is correct I urgently woudl ask you to check with local mappers BEFORE any unclear changes are submitted!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64460068
kayle (2018-11-19 06:04:24+00:00): Ja len pre istotu, preklad v iD editore nie je dobrý a označenie "poschodia" by mal byť správne "podlažia".
Takže prízemný dom má 1 podlažie a sedemposchodový má 8 podlaží.
Leo Slager (2018-11-13 23:47:25+00:00): reverted due to vandalisme
nevw (2018-11-29 05:49:18+00:00): Reverted based on other edits, Yuzu resaurant shifted to wrong position, now corrected.
Luzandro (2018-11-14 07:51:11+00:00): Hallo patenthalse,

ich bin auch kein Freund davon, private Gärten einzuzeichnen, aber prinzipiell ist es nicht zwingend falsch, es sollte nur entsprechend mit garden:type=residential und/oder access=private deklariert sein

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

Gerade so Fleckerlteppiche mit nur vereinzelten Gärten kann man mMn. aber auch löschen.
patenthalse (2018-11-18 20:28:06+00:00): in dem fall waren in königstetten ein paar gärten, wo über meherere parzellen und häuser hinweg einfach ein "garten" geklotz wurde.

wäre es wenigstens sauber gemacht, wäre es ja diskussionswürdig (ich mache es sicher nicht, würde es aber nicht löschen). 

lg
tux67 (2018-11-14 09:10:32+00:00): most likely it has been mapped with exactly this intention. do you have any local knowledge - if not this CS should be reverted
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64460656
tux67 (2018-11-16 08:55:12+00:00): Hi, any comment before this get's reverted?
glimap (2018-11-16 08:59:47+00:00): Hi. Revert it! Sorry for the inconveniance
tux67 (2018-11-16 09:09:14+00:00): ok, just ensure you also come back to the other changesets with comments from the community.
tux67 (2018-11-16 09:19:09+00:00): reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64557912
kartonage (2018-11-17 17:52:42+00:00): Hallo PEAL1993, 
danke für das Hinzufügen von Gebäuden. Kleiner Tipp für die Bearbeitung mit dem iD-Editor: bei ausgewähltem Objekt kannst du das Objekt mit 's' rechteckig machen. Hilfreich bei Gebäuden, da diese ja meist doch rechteckig sind.

Schöne Grüße
freeExec (2018-11-14 08:06:34+00:00): На проезд в депо вы указали неподходящий тег, а проезд там и так есть. Плюс унесли куда-то дерево. Поэтому вашу правку я отменяю.
RicoElectrico (2018-11-13 23:47:40+00:00): Z tego co wiem i tak na razie craft=* się nie wyświetlają na domyślnej warstwie. Spytaj Kocia.
daniel_solow (2018-11-14 15:47:42+00:00): Hi I noticed your fix of several boundaries across the country. If you have a chance can you also look at the following relations? I moved them and I don't know how to fix the holes I've created inside JOSM. The validation tool is not very forgiving. Thank you for your contribution to Long Island administrative boundaries!
South Valley Stream :174400
Woodmere:174931
Valley Stream:174399
kartonage (2018-11-15 07:08:06+00:00): Hey there WiktoriaGieron,

thanks for contributing. Unfortunately I have stumbled upon lots of overlapping errors with your added buildings. (https://image.ibb.co/jKjVC0/dublin-Wiktoria-Gieron.png) As you can see the buildings overlap, not representing their real life positions correctly. Which is unfortunate because someone else, me in this case, eventually will have to go through all of these buildings again. (Since everybody's busy this can take months/years usually) While quanitity is good, it's not much worth without quality. OSM is not a competition to draw the most, quality is valued a lot more. And I have seen buildings from you that were perfectly fine. So I hope you can invest a little bit more time and focus in quality the next time around. I, and subsequently the data users, would appreciate it. Thanks
If you have questions or need help, feel free to ask.

Best regards
Frutiger (2018-12-04 08:13:23+00:00): Curtin Ave West does not join on to Remora Rd.
abakus_uploader (2018-11-14 23:30:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-11-13 23:54:36+00:00): Grotendeels gemapt, maar als iemand het nog specifieker wil mappen, is dat van harte welkom.
AgusQui (2018-11-18 03:28:01+00:00): las calles urbanas de importancia se clasifican como tertiary segun nuestra convención
GidonW (2018-11-28 16:20:30+00:00): very funny :)
Mobilités Montpellier Méditerranée Métropole (2018-11-19 08:53:40+00:00): Dear Denis Feurer,

It seems that you feel concerned about cycle infrastructures. Here are a few comments :
1. cycleway are defined by traffic signs and marking, from a regulation point of view. As soon as none exists, this way could be tagged as footway :https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/644034301
However, this could be temporary and it may be interesting to keep "bicycle=yes". In the same time, your tags this will help us improve road marking.
2. When there is still road marking but no traffic sign, we would like to keep highway=cycleway. 
This is the case for this way between Rue Daru and Rue Brueys : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133732029
We can imagine an "infrastructure fixme" tag so that you can add something like "traffic sign missing"
Feel free to answer and comment this post.

Emmanuel
Denis Feurer (2018-11-19 11:43:56+00:00): Dear Emmanuel,

I'm very pleased to have this exchange! I'm all the more excited when knowing that updates may help Montpellier 3M in their work! I would also be pleased to have direct exchanges, if needed/interesting. How do Montpellier 3M uses/contributes to OSM ? Do you draw new bike ways when installed ? Do you follow changes and if so, how and what for ?

My concern is that OSM would reflect reality, so that we can provide accurate data to new users. It is particularly important to avoid having people puzzled by a wrong map and sent to dangerous places. For instance the beginning of the Cours Gambetta is a place where I would not go by bike with my children, would you ? Personally I go on the other side.

More specifically, with your comments :
1. Your remark makes sense. Though if there are no traffic sign nor road marks, other users (e.g. pedestrians) cannot know that cyclists may come: it can lead to dangerous situations. Then, if the road marks were not restored as soon as the road work ended, we can picture out that it will last long enough to justify a map update.
2. Totally agree, and the tag "construction", associated with a human-readable remark may favorably be used when cycle ways are not finished/maintained.

Denis

P.S : to update the map, I look at this kind of rendering :
http://amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/montpellier_34172/facilities
as compared to this kind of recommendations :
http://voiriepourtous.cerema.fr/IMG/pdf/amenagements_cyclables2_cle014378.pdf
Warin61 (2018-11-14 07:10:12+00:00): Hi,

Re Way: Tallawong Station Parking (618483697).
The parking area does not extend out to the road nor the cycleway. It has a smaller area and ideally should be mapped as such. I have reduced it accordingly.
BCNorwich (2018-11-14 08:17:46+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
To comply with OSM best practice I've replaced your area tag with building=yes, now the feature shows as a building. I also added your website.

Regards Bernard.
freeExec (2018-11-14 08:11:52+00:00): Про арки в домах: уровень -1 в данном случае не указывается. тип туннеля стоит уточнить как tunnel=building_passage
Himké (2018-12-22 00:45:45+00:00): What did you do to Christ Church Cemetery?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2018-12-22 01:15:29+00:00): Its called a mistake making a boundary
freeExec (2018-11-14 08:15:17+00:00): Вы продублировали объект (теперь их как бы два), теги уже стоят на территории. На здание стоит добавить адрес.
muralito (2018-11-15 02:44:06+00:00): Hola. ¿Que criterios estas usando para reclasificar estas vias?
mavl (2019-07-21 11:51:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:51:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:51:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:51:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
ejont (2019-04-05 19:03:29+00:00): I've fixed the road deleted here
ejont (2019-04-05 18:59:45+00:00): I've fixed the road deleted here
GeoJess (2020-08-06 20:28:32+00:00): Hi 丁莹0106140217,

Thanks for all of your contributions to OSM! I noticed in this area: 28.24290/113.07628 (way: 644203342, for example) that a lot of the blocks are tagged as buildings. I believe the proper way to use this tag is to draw each of the individual buildings and tag them as building=yes, according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building.  Let me know if my message is unclear and if there is any way I can help.

Regards,
Jesspher
MerlinPendragon (2018-11-14 20:46:23+00:00): Hey, this area has been undergoing a significant amount of construction over the last year or so, and part of that construction was the connecting of of E 16th Ave to N High St.
tmadhuli (2018-11-16 06:50:44+00:00): Hi MerlinPendragon,

Thanks a lot for the update. The edit was made per the resources available in OSM. As you suggested the resources might have been outdated due to new constructions in the area.
Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
tmadhuli
Bickendan (2018-11-15 06:51:46+00:00): This change needs to be reverted. See Changeset: 64421203. 
Falk Road no longer crosses WA 500, and the ERSI 2017 data is no longer accurate.
datbrahm (2018-11-15 08:32:57+00:00): Hi Bickendan,

Thanks for your update. As per your recommendation I have reverted the connecting segment between Falk road across WA500 and Northeast Falk road.
Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Datbrahm
marc__marc (2019-07-31 09:01:20+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631066866
what's the meaning of static_caravan=boxcar ?
Regards,
Marc
Arlo James Barnes (2019-07-31 19:54:13+00:00): Like a static caravan (or as we call them locally, mobile home), it is a structure that was designed to be transportable but has now settled to a presumably final location; in this case, that structure used to be a refrigerated boxcar.

Here it is:
https://storage11.openstreetcam.org/files/photo/2019/5/2/lth/1436886_dd77b_9.jpg
marc__marc (2019-08-23 07:45:26+00:00): Hello,
thanks for the reply.
what did you mean with "used to be a boxcar" ? tag describe the current used as a shop+gallery
Arlo James Barnes (2019-08-24 18:02:37+00:00): Yes, that is all true. As you might be able to tell from the image, the structure is a large wooden box that used to be on rail wheels insulated so that food could be transported by rail. It was then abandoned somewhere, and then the current owners fixed it up and turned it into a small gallery space that sells art, books, and other items.
Arlo James Barnes (2019-08-24 18:04:34+00:00): Oh, I see your changes. Mostly an improvement, thanks, but the boxcar is no longer refrigerated, so it's actually `air_conditioning=no`.
marc__marc (2019-08-25 22:04:02+00:00): thanks for you reply.
another user thinks that a boxcar isn't a  container and therefore building=boxcar is mabe better than building=container container=boxcar
building:material=wood is maybe also a good idea.
Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse (2019-09-01 11:11:35+00:00): "building=boxcar" sounds good to me, if that's what it was originally built as.  
Best Regards,
Andy
eggie (2018-11-14 07:51:44+00:00): Denk dat die hele naam old_name Scheltema er wel af kan.
ejont (2019-04-05 12:49:01+00:00): I restored a part of SH236 that was deleted here
nikhil5 (2019-03-01 06:02:30+00:00): "Hi  pujisilalahi,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 644256118 way 644256119 way 507525334 classified as 'Unclassified'.However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,the area seems to be residential.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-07-20 17:28:58+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other mistagging for POI in changeset:

https://osm.org/changeset/186073633
DUGA (2021-03-28 00:04:39+00:00): Please do not use Bing imagery to add low quality building areas.
DUGA (2021-03-28 00:06:46+00:00): Please also review your changeset before submitting it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/182750330/history
Piskvor (2018-11-14 10:54:53+00:00): Super :) V takovém případě je vhodné i smazat tag construction= , respektive přenést jeho obsah do tagu určujícího objekt (tj. tady do building= )
Isolator (2018-11-14 09:00:51+00:00): Shit. Der Weg ist doch da. Man sieht ihn aber nur von oben kommend. Ich werde ihn wieder einzeichnen.
Vulcanodong (2018-11-14 08:16:24+00:00): 甘孜州交警支队最新通报，11月14号凌晨三点至四点，因白格堰塞湖洪峰经过巴塘县竹巴龙乡和苏哇龙乡，造成当地金沙江大桥冲毁，318国道竹巴龙段部分路基冲毁，路面大面积塌陷，道路完全中断
osmviborg (2018-11-14 08:53:12+00:00): Hvis du mener det er nødvendigt med en vej ind til transformatorstationen, så skal du sætte en låge (barrier=gate) i hegnet der er rundt om området. Der er jo ikke offentlig adgang til området.
DUGA (2021-04-06 14:32:36+00:00): Few of your edit have been reverted because they are not valid.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/644294345#map=18/37.65532/-77.43545
SomeoneElse (2020-06-18 19:56:21+00:00): Hello,
This change removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8692684 and the adjacent islands as inners from Morocco.  Are you sure that this is correct?  It would suggest dual administration (as is effectively the case with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perejil_Island to the west), whereas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alhucemas_Islands suggests that this is not the case here.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-06-18 19:56:37+00:00): Hola,
Este cambio eliminó https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8692684 y las islas adyacentes como interiores de Marruecos. ¿Estás seguro de que esto es correcto? Sugeriría administración dual (como es efectivamente el caso con https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perejil_Island al oeste), mientras que https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alhucemas_Islands sugiere que este no es el caso aquí.
Atentamente,
Andy
mavl (2018-11-14 16:35:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника вы взяли адресные данные.
Martin Borsje (2018-11-14 18:42:22+00:00): Dankjewel :-)
klimpetje (2018-11-14 18:45:29+00:00): We leren iedere dag weer wat bij. 👍🏼
Martin Borsje (2018-11-14 18:55:00+00:00): Ja, er is nog heel wat discussie hoe een fietsstraat te mappen. In België heeft het een wettelijke status, in Nederland niet. Je mapt terecht V(max)=80 en dat op een fietsstraat! Er staat overigens wel een bord met adviessnelheid 25 km/h. Rare jongens die verkeersambtenaren...:-)
Goed beschouwd betekent het bord fietsstraat in NL dus geen donder. Misschien wordt dat ooit beter.
Groet
eda_n (2018-11-14 09:06:29+00:00): Pas sur de l’écriture des horaires  d'ouverture. Le glacier est ouvert 7/7 de 13h-19h d'octobre à mai et de 13h-00h30 de juin à septembre.
atcomapper (2018-11-14 11:14:58+00:00): There is no sign with speed limit here, so I removed the 30 km/h limit you added
UMR_Passages (2018-11-21 13:22:57+00:00): Correction, il s'agit de la suppression d'un arrêt de bus.
arvdk (2018-11-14 21:15:41+00:00): Thanks, I was already wondering why it didn't show up. Wasn't in the position to use JOSM so no proper validation...
Robert46798 (2018-11-15 07:59:07+00:00): Hallo Commander Chaos,

ich habe das auch nicht exakt im Kopf, aber mit Blick auf dieses Bild (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.12609437759966&lng=11.638191919773817&z=17&pKey=wOBj6s75TVTjPqpUZA1pWg&focus=photo) würde ich erst einmal bedingt zustimmen. Der mittlere Teil sieht historisch aus, der Rand eher wie eine "Rekonstruktion". Ich denke das sollte man sich noch mal vor Ort anschauen.

Es gibt auch noch diesen Tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcitywalls Das Wiki ist, was die Verwendung der beiden Werte angeht, nicht ganz eindeutig. Es gibt auch Differenzen zwischen EN & DE. Am Fürstenwall sind einfach beide Werte eingetragen. Das würde ich wahrscheinlich auch so machen. Nur müsste man dann genau schauen wo wirklich eine historische Stadtmauer steht. Den Teil würde ich dann als Stadtmauer eintragen. Der Rest wirkt für mich zu sehr nach schnöder Betonwand.

Viele Grüße,
Robert

PS: Bei über 450 Änderungssätzen solltest du wirklich über den Wechsel des Editors nachdenken. Ich kann dir JOSM empfehlen. Er wird von den Meisten verwendet die viel bearbeiten. Die Oberfläche ist nicht so schön und es gibt eine steile Lernkurve, aber die Möglichkeiten sind deutlich größer als bei iD. Hier ein gutes Tutorial: https://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf
Commander Chaos (2018-11-15 18:55:30+00:00): Hallo Robert,
gut zu wissen, dass bei OSM zwischen normaler "Citywall" und "historischer Citywall" unterschieden wird. Und ja, auf dem einen Bild sieht mir das auch so aus, als wäre die Betonwand mit historisierenden Elementen dekoriert.

Danke für den Tipp mit JOSM, ich werde mir das mal bei Zeiten in Ruhe anschauen. Allerdings hatte ich mit der Webbasierten Bearbeitung wenig Probleme.

Schöne Grüße,
Marvin
cadsauxk (2019-09-15 20:20:47+00:00): Olá colega, por favor não converta vias para track, obrigado.
Alecs01 (2018-11-19 19:58:24+00:00): Ciao Paola, sei sicura della posizione? il civico 21 di quella via è più avanti https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2419130548 lì c'è il numero civico di via Arese https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4552082062
AkuAnakTimur (2018-11-14 09:52:59+00:00): Kawasan macam ni... garden.

Cuba bayang, leisure=park ni tempat tumpuan orang ramai datang bila-bila masa

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=garden
Fahmi Repro (2018-11-14 10:07:58+00:00): nk tukar apa ni??
Fahmi Repro (2018-11-14 10:10:00+00:00): ok dh tukar, grass & trees
AkuAnakTimur (2018-11-14 09:51:27+00:00): Grassland ni senang cakap, macam tempat lembu ragut rumput. Rumput panjang-panjang.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=grassland
Fahmi Repro (2018-11-14 09:54:13+00:00): yg ni tmpt anjing kucing selalu berak, Tmpt lembu kuda kmbing tak usik lg..hehehe
shaikh solaiman (2018-11-14 13:21:10+00:00): @GerdP this is a industrial area ..and that's why we are using service tag to classify  this. And the imagery we  are using is Map box, in that imagery  i cannot see more road to continue . if you have please connect it.
GerdP (2018-11-14 13:36:43+00:00): Yes, OK. Next time watch out for the typo.
atcomapper (2018-11-14 11:10:07+00:00): Du skal passe lidt på når du trækker i kortet for at bevæge dig rundt. Her var du kommet til at trække enden af Sortemosevej helt op til Hareskov Kirke og dermed oprettet en lang vej der gik tværs igennem en masse huse
atcomapper (2018-11-14 11:07:19+00:00): Bemærk venligst at navnefeltet kun skal udfyldes, hvis objektet har et faktisk navn. "Sportshal v. Kildegårdsskolen" er ikke et navn, men mere et beskrivelse af objektet.
Goumoutch (2018-11-14 09:55:38+00:00): Pas sûr de commenct décrire le fait que c'est un magasin qui est spécialisé en vente de chocolats, thés, café et cadeaux. Du coup j'ai mis 4 fois shop pour chacun de ces produits. C'est bon?
maraf24 (2018-11-14 20:50:30+00:00): Proszę nie umieszczać w OSM fikcyjnych obiektów.
Bar usunięty.