piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2022-01-22 11:19:36+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that you used many tags here that are not used in other places. Please make sure you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor. This is the only way to make sure that every user and every application can make use of the data properly.

It seems that you are a group of people working together? Please make sure the leader of the effort is aware of the Organised Editing Guidelines of OSM:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
user_5359 (2022-01-23 07:34:31+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Danke für Deinen Eintrag. Bitte lies Dir auch die entsprechende Wiki Seite https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator durch.
user_2066394 (2022-01-21 16:36:54+00:00): Ist er dort eingetragen/vorbereitet?
XimeX (2022-01-23 12:39:37+00:00): Hier auch noch ein kleiner Hinweis zu colour=blau:
Werte sollen immer auf englisch sein. Also statt "blau" bitte "blue" verwenden
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-22 18:16:43+00:00): Hey NANDJO,

Feedback; The building you mapped seems inaccurate. Try using Maxar -which seems to be the best imagery to use here- and zooming in as far as needed to see what you are mapping. Map the roof outline -don't include walls or shadows-.
You can always move individual, multiple or all nodes, rotate, or undo if you make a mistake. Be sure to again square the building after adjusting it.
If you are able to see the grey area on the right of the roof, this may be a wall. If you think so too, you can move the whole roof outline down the wall to the surface. It doesn't have to match the rotation or size of the wall; in order to map the surface outline you may need to survey the building -I assume you aren't able to do this-.

If you need more help, contact your/a community. You can also find communities here:
https://openstreetmap.community/

Regards,

Daniel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-01-21 14:20:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... 
Kijk even hier hoe dat op te lossen.
Het is een wandelpad.. dus het geheel zal al niet routeren voor fietsers. 
Maar goed .. wanneer je naast je fiets wil lopen.. dan kun je de maten bijtaggen. 


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dcycle_barrier

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2022-01-23 07:10:16+00:00): Please explain the meaning of the keys used and why information without OSM meaning has been taken over. Other keys already have different OSM keys. Please enter the values in such a way that they are not only usable for your HOT project.

Veuillez expliquer la signification des clés utilisées et pourquoi des informations sans signification OSM ont été reprises. D'autres clés ont déjà des clés OSM différentes. Veuillez saisir les valeurs de manière à ce qu'elles ne soient pas uniquement utilisables pour votre projet HOT.
Lee Carré (2022-02-01 20:15:48+00:00): I happened to be passing by, recently. So, had a closer look.

The changes (from what I gather of the previous geometry) reflect reality; the minor way does join the major way, via a gate.

Ironically, however, the way (and arguably the gate, too) are very much disused. Both the way & gate are overgrown (weeds & brambles). The gate is perma-locked, rusted, disintegrating, and generally neglected.

In future, naming which road(s) or giving other location clues in your changeset comment will help local mappers.
DianaDemchuk (2022-02-03 06:58:26+00:00): Thanks a lot for the clarification! I added new tags to the road and made it abandoned. New Changeset  https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/207462713
Lee Carré (2022-02-04 10:28:53+00:00): 👍
I'll take a look at that changeset shortly.

Glad to help. Thanks for giving my island some much needed attention. There's only a few locals contributing, and a vast amount yet to do.
Lee Carré (2022-02-04 10:33:01+00:00): Thanks for the pointer to that history review tool. Didn't know about that one 🙂.

For future (easier) navigation: http://www.osm.org/changeset/116948247
Dimitar155 (2022-01-23 08:22:55+00:00): Защо си премахнал пътя между село Брънеците и село Копчелин? Ясно е обозначено, че е в лошо състояние и е маркиран като "unmaintained track road", което се отчита от софтуерите за навигация.
Herman Lee (2022-05-03 14:33:20+00:00): Can you explain the circles in your changesets?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:08:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
user_13980615 (2022-01-22 06:12:34+00:00): 修正：范围应为狼山东麓、南麓
ma-rt-in (2022-01-23 16:23:21+00:00): Hello znouz,

I have reverted your changes to the border in the Moselle. Your changes were simply wrong. The Moselle forms a common border area. In other words, there is no clear demarcation of the territory.

Where did your intention to place the border in the middle of the river come from?

Greetings
znouz (2022-01-23 17:36:54+00:00): both Google maps and TomTom show border at the river centre, street view at this location shows signs where the border is
in OSM A13 ends at the border (bridge centre)
https://www.google.com/maps/place/49%C2%B028'44.9%22N+6%C2%B022'03.6%22E/@49.4794168,6.3682032,18z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x262aeb07e43e4e5c!8m2!3d49.47913!4d6.36766

what makes you think that border in on Luxembourg side?
ma-rt-in (2022-01-24 06:10:42+00:00): Google, in whatever form, is strictly forbidden to use, as otherwise their copyright is infringed. 
Using TomTom as a source is also not really good. Just because it is shown on their maps does not mean that the data is correct.
Here is a link to Wikipedia, where you can learn more about the border area: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemeinschaftliches_deutsch-luxemburgisches_Hoheitsgebiet
znouz (2022-01-24 08:58:57+00:00): unfortunately this is not answer to my question - what makes you think that border in on Luxembourg side?
ma-rt-in (2022-01-24 18:12:43+00:00): The border of Rhineland-Palatinate is on the left side of the Moselle (downstream) and that of Luxembourg on the right side of the Moselle. The basis for this is Article XXV of the Vienna Congress Act of 9 June 1815 with its formulation " Les rivières elles-mêmes, en tant qu'elles forment la frontière, appartiendront en commun aux Puissances limitrophes. " translated => "The rivers themselves belong in common to the bordering powers, in so far as they form the frontier."
znouz (2022-01-24 18:42:39+00:00): but in that case road links (and other features) attributed as being in Luxembourg are not in Luxembourg

and why isn't border sign at the border?
ma-rt-in (2022-01-24 18:51:43+00:00): I don't understand your first question. 

About the border sign: They don't always have to be right on the border. I know many places where the border sign is offset from the border by several metres to 100 metres.
znouz (2022-01-24 18:56:44+00:00): here is one example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445536696#map=19/49.47914/6.36755

this link is not in Luxembourg
ma-rt-in (2022-01-24 19:00:18+00:00): What exactly do you want to tell me with that? Should the road section be in Luxembourg or not?
Especially since all bridges that span the common border area are maintained by both countries.
znouz (2022-01-24 19:17:51+00:00): I thought I made myself clear

if a feature is not within border, then it cannot be attributed as if it was
ma-rt-in (2022-01-25 13:51:23+00:00): So you have moved the border so that objects can be clearly assigned to a state, ignoring the actual circumstances?

I don't think that would be helpful in the OSM sense.
Erdrandbewohner (2022-01-25 15:04:46+00:00): "From Apach, the Moselle has formed a condominium over a length of 36 km since 1816, a joint German-Luxembourgian territory for which the distribution of responsibilities has been regulated in an agreement since 1976. The International Moselle Society, founded in 1957 initially to finance the expansion, administers the navigation fees and the costs of operation and maintenance to be covered from them." https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosel#Verwaltung (in German)
NieWnen (2022-01-21 13:41:14+00:00): source += survey
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-19 16:17:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023311124/history - są tu jakiekolwiek ślady tych torów?
user_5359 (2022-01-23 07:10:41+00:00): Please explain the meaning of the keys used and why information without OSM meaning has been taken over. Other keys already have different OSM keys. Please enter the values in such a way that they are not only usable for your HOT project.

Veuillez expliquer la signification des clés utilisées et pourquoi des informations sans signification OSM ont été reprises. D'autres clés ont déjà des clés OSM différentes. Veuillez saisir les valeurs de manière à ce qu'elles ne soient pas uniquement utilisables pour votre projet HOT.
mueschel (2022-01-22 11:19:43+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that you used many tags here that are not used in other places. Please make sure you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor. This is the only way to make sure that every user and every application can make use of the data properly.

It seems that you are a group of people working together? Please make sure the leader of the effort is aware of the Organised Editing Guidelines of OSM:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2022-01-22 11:19:40+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that you used many tags here that are not used in other places. Please make sure you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor. This is the only way to make sure that every user and every application can make use of the data properly.

It seems that you are a group of people working together? Please make sure the leader of the effort is aware of the Organised Editing Guidelines of OSM:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
4004 (2022-01-24 01:37:04+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
все классно, очень детально, одна мелочь - даты пишутся в iso формате (ГГГГ-ММ-ДД)
BPTT (2023-11-30 19:02:34+00:00): I'm very curious about your source for the Overlook Park neighborhood boundary. Could you share it? Thanks!
1998alexkane (2023-11-30 21:30:51+00:00): I don't see an Overlook Park, do you mean Overlook Farms? If so, I didn't draw it unfortunately, I was just the last person to touch it ;)
user_5359 (2022-01-23 07:06:06+00:00): Please explain the meaning of the keys used and why information without OSM meaning has been taken over. Other keys already have different OSM keys. Please enter the values in such a way that they are not only usable for your HOT project.

Veuillez expliquer la signification des clés utilisées et pourquoi des informations sans signification OSM ont été reprises. D'autres clés ont déjà des clés OSM différentes. Veuillez saisir les valeurs de manière à ce qu'elles ne soient pas uniquement utilisables pour votre projet HOT.
user_5359 (2022-01-24 10:06:02+00:00): Please explain the meaning of the keys used and why information without OSM meaning has been taken over. Other keys already have different OSM keys. Please enter the values in such a way that they are not only usable for your HOT project.

Veuillez expliquer la signification des clés utilisées et pourquoi des informations sans signification OSM ont été reprises. D'autres clés ont déjà des clés OSM différentes. Veuillez saisir les valeurs de manière à ce qu'elles ne soient pas uniquement utilisables pour votre projet HOT.
ToniE (2022-03-03 10:12:02+00:00): Servus,

"E7" ist leider wieder aus dem "Angebot" der MVG verschwunden. Im GTFS vom 2022-03-01 nicht mehr drin.

Gruß,
Toni
marcoSt (2022-03-03 19:12:47+00:00): Ich hab mal auf der MVV-Seite geschaut. Dort gibt sie noch, siehe https://efa.mvv-muenchen.de/ttb/mvv_220E7___H_s22_1.pdf.

Bei der MVG steht, dass der Trum-Shuttle bis auf Weiteres nicht fährt, siehe https://www.mvg.de/services/freizeittipps/mvg-museum/anfahrt-oeffnungszeiten.html#intro.

Wahrscheinlich was lang anhaltendes Vorübergehendes wegen Corona und Co. ;-)
marcoSt (2022-03-04 11:38:14+00:00): Trotzdem gibt es noch einen Aushangfahrplan für diese Tramlinie: https://www.mvg.de/aushangfahrplan/E7_R_MVG_2.pdf. Komische Geschichte. :-|
ToniE (2022-03-04 11:47:04+00:00): Hmm, nun gut, es gibt auch andere Linien *V, ... die nicht in GTFS sind, aber als PDF existieren - lassen wir's drin.
mueschel (2022-01-22 11:19:54+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that you used many tags here that are not used in other places. Please make sure you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor. This is the only way to make sure that every user and every application can make use of the data properly.

It seems that you are a group of people working together? Please make sure the leader of the effort is aware of the Organised Editing Guidelines of OSM:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2022-01-22 11:19:46+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that you used many tags here that are not used in other places. Please make sure you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor. This is the only way to make sure that every user and every application can make use of the data properly.

It seems that you are a group of people working together? Please make sure the leader of the effort is aware of the Organised Editing Guidelines of OSM:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
FrankOverman (2022-01-21 20:11:40+00:00): Ik word gevolgd ;)
Hi Eggie, ik zet meestal deze tags erop:
oneway=yes
cycleway=opposite
Maar ik zie dat je er 3 tags aan wil besteden, ook voor mofa en moped.
Dan is er nog heel wat aan te passen in the Big NL ;)
eggie (2022-01-21 21:20:13+00:00): Hoi...
Nee.. ik volg niemand.. wel de discussies hier
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions?c=Netherlands#7/52.093/5.180
Wanneer ik niet zeker weet of moped ook uitgezonderd is laat ik die cycleway=opposite staan.., maar ik had even gespiekt dus aangepast naar de nieuwste tagging. 

Maar dat aanpassen is iets van de lange adem.  Alleen als ik het bij toeval tegenkom pas ik het aan.
Op het forum loopt een draadje. Daar was meen ik het voorstel het allemaal in één keer aan te passen. dat gaat dus niet, want je weet niet welke tweewielers uitgezonderd zijn.
cycleway=opposite werkt ook gewoon nog.

Er zal wel ergens een preset zijn om het simpel aan te passen. 
Zie even dit draadje.. 
We zijn niet voor automatic edits..  
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65612

De wiki schijnt ook bijgewerkt te zijn.

Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-01-21 21:24:31+00:00): Ter Leering ende Vermaeck.. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:cycleway
....................
cycleway =opposite 	way 	Verouderd, gebruik dit niet meer in Nederland

Gebruik voor wegen met éénrichtingsverkeer voor auto's, maar tweerichtingsverkeer voor fietsen liever oneway:bicycle=no, eventueel in combinatie met oneway:mofa=no en oneway:moped=no.
user_5359 (2022-01-23 07:05:24+00:00): Please explain the meaning of the keys used and why information without OSM meaning has been taken over. Other keys already have different OSM keys. Please enter the values in such a way that they are not only usable for your HOT project.

Veuillez expliquer la signification des clés utilisées et pourquoi des informations sans signification OSM ont été reprises. D'autres clés ont déjà des clés OSM différentes. Veuillez saisir les valeurs de manière à ce qu'elles ne soient pas uniquement utilisables pour votre projet HOT.
stillhart (2023-10-19 22:23:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9437122271

isn't this an emergency_bay? I think there are no normal stops along umfahrungen.
ivanatora (2022-01-22 08:27:39+00:00): На каква база е преместена триангулачната точка 1264552824? 
Тези са импортнати от официален списък с GPS координати и би трябвало да са доста точни.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-23 15:22:22+00:00): Триангулационната точка е върната на първоначалното ѝ място в промяна 118826345.
JensTyller (2022-01-21 15:01:15+00:00): Kirken officielle navn er Gethsemane Kirke, men kirken bliver brugt under andet navn. Med andre ord, så er det officielle navn mere navnet på bygningen, end på kirken.

Kirken hedder ukirke og det er det navn der skal figurer på visualiseringer.

Jeg ved dette, da jeg er præstekonen til den pågældende kirke.
b-holdet (2022-01-22 06:59:31+00:00): Jeg har rettet navnet til "uKirke" (store og små bogstaver), som ser ud til at være det navn der bruges

https://folkekirken-vesterbro.dk/ukirke
muralito (2022-01-21 19:58:27+00:00): Si es futuro, hasta que no se pueda usar no se puede marcar como ruteable...
eggie (2022-01-21 15:47:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Lijkt me oke als dit veranderd is.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jaap de vries (2022-02-11 13:34:01+00:00): Ik weet niet of je het weet maar het fietspad wat je hebt aangepast nabij de Pietersbergweg, loopt ietsjes verder en sluit pas aan bij de kruising van de Paasberg en dus na de zebra.
Tilia_J (2022-02-12 19:30:55+00:00): Volgens AHN en BGT was deze al correct gepositioneerd.
jaap de vries (2022-02-14 07:19:47+00:00): Dan zit er een fout want nu fiets je dan tegen langsparkeervakken aan die regelmatig vol staan. Als je bekend bent, zie je duidelijk de tegels liggen die als fietspad in gebruik zijn. Pas het even aan, want ik zie dat veel mensen hier bijna op geparkeerde auto's op knallen.
Tilia_J (2022-02-14 10:23:39+00:00): Ik was inderdaad stomverbaasd over het feit dat er geen "normaal" einde van het fietspad was.

Rode tegels heb ik niet gezien toen ik hier tijdje terug met de auto langs reed.

Ik ging voor het einde enkel uit van het G13 verkeersbord.
jaap de vries (2022-02-15 08:02:06+00:00): Ik zie dat je in het park Hartenstein de grasmat hebt aangepast, nu loopt ie ook dwars door de oude mavo en het restaurant. Gebruikte je hier ook de ahn en bgt?
Tilia_J (2022-02-15 15:31:08+00:00): Zie comment onder https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117335681

Deze situatie was al zo vóórdat ik de grasmat aangeraakt heb.
Famlam (2022-01-25 18:57:47+00:00): Dag dvdhoven, foutje waarschijnlijk, maar volgens mij ben je een bron vergeten, zij het survey, zei het een site met de routes erop ;)
mkarau (2022-02-07 04:24:59+00:00): Your Edits are incorrect. You used Aerial imagery, and I used the most up to date GPS traces that actually represent the new road patterns. Please Revert.
mkarau (2022-02-07 04:25:18+00:00): Your Edits are incorrect. You used Aerial imagery, and I used the most up to date GPS traces that actually represent the new road patterns. Please Revert.
wireguy (2022-04-05 12:26:19+00:00): Ram,
way 232228511
way 1023342244

both seem to both be in Herne Hill relation causing the boundary to not be closed.
 I think you can remove the way 232228511 (fence) .
ramthelinefeed (2022-04-05 13:47:20+00:00): Ah! Yes - thanks that had been baffling me - can you fix it? 
(All these boundaries change in May 5th 2022 by the way - complete new set of wards! I've mapped two of them so far... lol)
wireguy (2022-04-05 13:56:35+00:00): corrected.
ramthelinefeed (2022-04-05 15:42:55+00:00): well played, sir! :)
user_2066394 (2022-01-21 15:48:23+00:00): Jetzt überschneiden sich die Gebäude.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part
Max Janguru (2022-01-21 15:49:52+00:00): die gehören beide zum Umspannwerk
Max Janguru (2022-01-21 15:55:34+00:00): Überschneidung wurde behoben danke für den tipp!
user_2066394 (2022-01-21 16:40:27+00:00): Technisch sind es 3 Gebäudeteile, wichtig wäre der Link gewesen :-)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part
eggie (2022-01-21 16:32:26+00:00): Je bedoeling is vast goed, maar oneway=no is default op alle wegen. We voegen dat alleen toe als je bang ment dat een andere mapper oneway=yes gaat taggen. Bv op een tweerichting fietsrotonde og een tweerichting fiets parallelpad.
Eggie
eggie (2022-01-21 16:37:12+00:00): reverted by changeset #116439206

Ik draai het toch even terug..foot en bicycle=yes hoort hier overigens ook niet . Dat is ook default. Actie van voorgaande mapper.
.. maar niet de moed opgeven :)

Gr eggie
eggie (2022-01-21 15:54:59+00:00): Beste Marina Kats  Hier heb je wegen verwijderd van de kaart. Waaom. Ook wegen die over Eigen en/of prive terrein lopen kunnen op de kaart en krijgen de accesstag permissiove en/of private mee.
Je hebt met deze actie ook de wandelroute Oosterscheldepad - 03 - Wissekerke-Colijnsplaat  onderbroken.. . Waarom is dat? 
Die wgen zijn er toch.. 
Je editshttps://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116436681

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-21 16:02:02+00:00): Adressen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster...  Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit aan het Kadaster doorgeven. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=veerhaven%203%20kats&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=1695010000002523&objectId=1695100000005410&geometry.x=51354.21&geometry.y=399465.30200042&zoomlevel=7

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-21 16:08:34+00:00): Reverted by changeset #116437899

De wandelroute is hier mee hersteld. 

Alles staat hier op permissive en/of private  / of verboden voor alles met wielen.
Svp geen wegen verwijderen van de kaart.
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-22 11:12:52+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3058742 ?

http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=116436719
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-22 11:13:29+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej edycji?
eggie (2022-01-21 15:58:07+00:00): De wegen die je hebt verwijderd stonden netjes op vehicle=no

Waarom dan verwijderen?



Kennelijk conform de bebording. De voorgaanmde mapper is een ervaren en lokaal bekend. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-21 16:04:31+00:00): reverted by changeset #116437840

Je edits zijn teruggezet.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
Mannivu (2022-01-21 17:44:19+00:00): D'accordo per "table", ma se l'attraversamento pedonale c'è ancora (non lo so, effettivamente, ma domani dovrei passare in zona) togliere highway=crossing è errato
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116437112
Micael Camozzi (2022-01-22 12:37:26+00:00): Ciao, errore mio, ora ho ripristinato highway=crossing. Grazie
Mannivu (2022-01-22 13:54:37+00:00): Tranquillo, era per sapere :)
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-02-04 05:49:33+00:00): لماذا تصر على هذا التعديل الغير صحيح، جميع العمليات يمكن عكسها وتصحيحها من جديد لذا نرجوا منكم عدم فعل ذلك
user_5359 (2022-01-23 07:15:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023347348. What is the meaning of the tag
Deep = House
Mix = 2021
?
UNGSC-cronoser (2022-01-26 15:13:41+00:00): it was fixed, thank you.
tguen (2022-01-21 20:40:52+00:00): It's not, according to https://tools.usps.com/find-location.htm?location=1377444#

I see a sign with this name on Bing Streetside, but those images are from 2014.
tguen (2022-01-21 21:03:49+00:00): Oops, I didn't see your source link, or that you used the official_name tag. Disregard.
eggie (2022-01-21 16:23:11+00:00): Zeker weten ? Een watermolen? 


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwatermill

Of bedoel je gewoon zo'n tjasker?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwindmill
man_made=windmill
windmill:type=tjasker

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:windmill:type

Kijk je nog even?
gr eggie
Cartographer10 (2022-01-21 16:30:32+00:00): Tis zo'n ding maar weet even niet of er naast man_made=windmill nog een aparte subtag voor is: https://i.imgur.com/RVLu3MP.png