piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscscnd (2021-04-07 15:03:54+00:00): 1. Unikaj tworzenia zestawów zmian obejmujących tak duży obszar.
2. Na przedszkolu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927113101) brakowało tagu amenity=kindergarten (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=kindergarten). Poprawione w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102491643>.
3. <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element> — usuń albo <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8394194861>, albo <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927113104>.
4. name=Rynek było zbędne na <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493120732>, ponieważ rynek jest już opisany na <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7239353>. Poprawiłem w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102492087>.
5. Nie prowadź highway=* po krawędzi building=*. Poprawiłem w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102492260>.
impiaaa (2021-05-05 00:26:13+00:00): The bounding box was accurate before you changed it. Reverted in changeset 104150179.
abakus_uploader (2021-04-07 22:31:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
G_P_J (2021-05-14 08:27:59+00:00): Cześć, postaraj się używać znacznika addr:place zamiast addr: city przy dodawaniu adresów w miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic.
mueschel (2021-04-11 10:41:22+00:00): Please watch out for the correct spelling. I fixed many "messsage" tags in the past days/weeks.
GOwin (2021-04-11 11:30:29+00:00): Thank you for helping me fix what I missed.
hauke-stieler (2021-04-16 21:58:14+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier die "Hoppe Tief- und Leitungsbau GmbH" eingetragen, allerdings ohne jeglichen top-level tag wie z.B. craft=builder oder so.
Wo hast du zudem die Info her, dass die hier sind? Unter dem Namen finde ich nämlich eine Firma unter ganz anderer Adresse.

Grüße
Hauke
Wirbel_75 (2021-04-17 08:47:51+00:00): Hallo, ich arbeite bei der Firma. Wir haben das Grundstück gekauft und werden es in Zukunft bebauen. Dann werde ich weitere Ergänzungen hinzufügen. 

Gruß Wirbel
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 11:03:38+00:00): Ah alles klar, Infos aus erster Hand, sehr schön :D
spiregrain (2021-04-07 11:09:21+00:00): Thanks for adding this service road.  Is there a reason it goes through the fence instead of going through the gate?
jgopatho (2021-04-08 11:55:16+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have missed modifying the gate with respect to the service road. Thanks for the heads up. Please find the changeset: 102561491 for the suggested edits. Always happy to learn from the community.
spiregrain (2021-04-08 12:25:22+00:00): Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-08 23:57:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106060517 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
mueschel (2021-04-08 15:58:44+00:00): Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - it's "toilets:num_chambers", not "toilets:number_chambers".
Peter Agenga (2021-04-09 08:21:01+00:00): I ran the validation tool and the tag was approved by JOSM …unless there is something else
mueschel (2021-04-09 08:29:08+00:00): There is no such "approval" implemented in JOSM. 
JOSM only checks for a few well-known tags and if you added something that looks very similar (and even this check fails regularly).
Peter Agenga (2021-04-09 10:16:34+00:00): I have noticed the same thing, I can see you made the corrections on my behalf already should I proceed to go through all my uploads to cross-check maybe?
mueschel (2021-04-09 10:21:03+00:00): I changed a few, but not all of them. Here are the remaining ones:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/15Wf

I can do the changes in the next days.
Peter Agenga (2021-04-09 11:37:42+00:00): Ok thank you...I will follow up on the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-08 23:57:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106060517 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
eggie (2021-04-07 10:34:28+00:00): Dag Dragonfly  Je kunt in zo'n geval de node verwijderen. Dat heb ik nu voor je gedaan.
MVG
eggie
Becky Candy (2021-04-21 11:32:28+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end,thank you mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102473730
woodpeck (2021-04-18 11:45:34+00:00): In this changeset you have added a trunk road in a rural location. This is an error. Please repair it.
Buraddo (2021-04-07 13:54:28+00:00): Hello
Administrative boundaries were imported from official sources (from ANCPI). Have you found conflicting information? Does this zone appear in Nușfalău in offical documents (like property deed or lang registry)?
Sylv3st3r (2021-04-07 19:22:47+00:00): Hello,
No, I did not found.
Sorry for that mistake.
Buraddo (2021-04-08 09:58:40+00:00): Changeset reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102551602
Cascafico (2021-04-22 07:19:43+00:00): Ciao,

ho visto che hai editato la way... io la cancellarei. Controindicazioni?
fabiotofy (2021-04-08 06:18:12+00:00): è dal 2015 che l'ISTAT ha imposto di inserire le lettere degli esponenti dei civici senza barra ed in minuscolo. Perché hai riportato i numero fuori standard ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102475055
Cascafico (2021-04-08 07:52:48+00:00): Immagino abbia riportato ciò che è scritto sul cartello. 

anonymousosm, grazie per l'inserimento, metto comunque in formato standard. Se hai occasione di inserire altri civici, usa la barra solo per un eventuale interno numerico e preferibilemente le lettere in muniscolo.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Polarbear-repair (2021-04-08 11:11:26+00:00): What is the source for these edits?
eggie (2021-04-07 11:15:30+00:00): Dag Artjen..

Het pad is netjes ingetekend. Op de luchtfoto is er overigens niets van te zien, maar als lokale mapper zul je van de hoed en de rand weten neem ik aan.
MVG
eggie
Artjen (2021-04-07 12:23:18+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Dit betreft een van twee nieuwe paden. 
De twee paden die ik zojuist heb toegevoegd heb ik op tweede paasdag zelf gewandeld. 
Aan de slijtage te zien wandelen daar vaker mensen. 

Groet,
Arjen
wireguy (2021-04-07 12:00:58+00:00): This building's campus has some other parking_entrance(s) that were missed (another 5-6?).  The building to the north has a wrong layer tag.  And what is the road attached to the building next to the road you changed?
Dmithry (2021-04-07 13:43:30+00:00): wireguy, Thanks for your note, another parking entrance has been added and the building tag has been changed to the north.
eggie (2021-04-07 14:38:36+00:00): Dag Artjes.. Lijkt mij correct zo
gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-10 12:55:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102697351 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some it-must-be-a-primary-if-it-is-a-back-street-in-my-village mapping in Saudia Arabia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4896
FraukeLeo (2021-04-08 11:32:11+00:00): Hallo Pakun, was genau steht hier? Ein frei nutzbares Haus zum Übernachten oder doch nur ein Wetterschutz-Unterstand? Bitte nur das mappen, was wirklich da ist. Die zwei "Wetterschutzhütten" nebeneinander hier wirken etwas eigenartig :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dshelter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut
Pakun (2021-04-09 06:08:24+00:00): Vielen Dank, löschen wohl vergessen. Ich habe die Fehlerhafte Hütte nun gelöscht und die Richtige (Shelter) erweitert. :)
FraukeLeo (2021-04-09 08:50:56+00:00): Alles gut :) – die alpine_hut und wilderness_hut fallen halt auf :) Zweite Frage: Heißt das Teil wirklich "Wetterschutzhütte" mit Namen? Ins name-Feld sollten nur richtige Eigennamen, keine Beschreibungen.
Pakun (2021-04-09 10:39:55+00:00): Tatsächlich heisst das dort Wetterschutzhütte Welterod  "Eishecke". Ich habe das eigntlich auch als Name so eingetragen. Es gibt ein Schild dort und werde mal genau nachsehen und das prüfen.
Pakun (2021-04-09 10:46:15+00:00): Ich bin natürlich sehr froh über die Wertvollen Hinweise. Ich werde mehr auf die Begrifflichkeiten und die Korrekte Verwendung achten. Danke. :)
Puxan (2021-04-07 15:09:41+00:00): Good job, remember to square the buildings. Buildings with more than 4 sides can also be squared.
Keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102476698
eggie (2021-04-07 13:41:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

feedback  
Elk begin is moeilijk. 
Je hebt met je bijdrage nogal wat schade veroorzaakt aan de kaart.
De trap bij de Kraanpoort ligt nu helemaal anders. 
Een gemeenteperk is een gebouw geworden met tag restaurant.
Hotel Dux is geen hotel meer maar een restaurant en nog een keer hetzelfde adres is een restaurant met een hele andere naam.
Wat was je bedoeling.
Ik draai dit even allemaal terug.

je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102476813
MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-07 13:46:23+00:00): Reverted by changeset  #102487907

Graag voorzichtig met de kaart en één ding tegelijk veranderen.
Adressen zijn uniek en al aanwezig op de kaart. Niet opnieuw aanmaken. 
Goed inzoomen en niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-07 15:05:50+00:00): De bistro heb ik even toegevoegd op jouw verzoek. 
Het adres staat op het hotel. 
MVG
eggie
Puxan (2021-04-07 15:12:30+00:00): Good job, the buildings shouldn’t be glued to each other even though they’re very close together. If you get closer to the image you can draw the buildings without them sticking
Keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102476982
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Frank-79 (2021-04-07 11:21:03+00:00): wollte einen neune Weg einzeichnen, hab wohl etwas falsch gemacht und weiss gerade nicht wie ich das hier ändern kann
Rainero (2021-04-07 13:36:20+00:00): Hallo Frank-79,
da hast du versehentlich einen Punkt eise Weges im Parkfriedhof ins Wohngebiet verschoben.
Ich habe das im CS 102486726 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102486726 rückgängig gemacht.
Danke fürs Melden und viel Spaß beim Mappen,
Rainer
Puxan (2021-04-07 15:17:37+00:00): You may not have noticed, but you have drawn one road over another.
Keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102477891
Puxan (2021-04-07 15:22:57+00:00): Nice job. Buildings should not be attached to the boundaries of residential areas. Remember to square the buildings, buildings with more than 4 sides can also be squared
Keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102478183
Puxan (2021-04-07 15:26:04+00:00): Nice job. Buildings should not be stuck on roads. Remember to square the buildings, buildings with more than 4 sides can also be squared
Keep mapping

An interesting page to map Africa https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot/West_African_HOT_Mapping_Tips 
https://learnosm.org
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102478577
FraukeLeo (2022-04-19 17:03:21+00:00): Hallo Pakun, du hast hier zwei Abbiegebeschränkungen eingebaut (die Relationen unten in der Liste). Frage 1: Sind die wirklich vor Ort so ausgeschildert? Ich sehe nämlich in beiden Fällen rein vom Luftbild keinen Grund dafür, aber kann ja sein. Frage 2: Ist dir bewusst, dass die so, wie du sie gemappt hast, allen Fahrzeugen das Abbiegen verbieten, also zB auch Radfahrern?
Pakun (2022-04-20 06:38:00+00:00): Guten Tag FraukeLeo,
Schwierige stelle, hier ist nur das befahren durch Landmaschinen zulässig ansonsten Verkehrszeichen 250. Es kräht dort kein Hahn danach wenn dort Radfahrer den Weg befahren, wenn dort aber Landmaschinen unterwegs sind werden Radfahrer dann auch mal übersehen. Das VKZ 250 bezieht auch Radfahrer mit ein. Ich passe dies an und mache es übersichtlicher erstelle ein Ausnahmen für Landmaschinen.
FraukeLeo (2022-04-20 07:36:16+00:00): Danke für die Antwort! Pass es aber bitte an die Realität an und nicht an mein Gemecker :) und auch nicht daran, wonach ein Hahn kräht oder nicht, oder ob Radfahrer da übersehen werden können (das können sie überall). Die Frage ist nur, was hier ausdrücklich erlaubt oder verboten ist. Deshalb frag ich ja nur, wie es in Wirklichkeit aussieht :)

Zeichen 250 ist einfach "vehicle=no" am Way. Beziehungsweise "vehicle=agriculture" für Zusatzzeichen 1026-36. Da brauchts keine Abbiegebeschränkung (und wenn, dann würde man sie aus allen drei Richtungen brauchen), das berücksichtigen alle Router auch so.

Andererseits steht momentan "access=destination" am Way, also "Anlieger frei", inkl. PKW, LKW und Radfahrer. Insgesamt steht in den Daten also jetzt "Anlieger dürfen hier durch, aber nur, wenn sie von links oder rechts kommen, nicht geradeaus von Welterod aus". Ist das der tatsächlich vorhandene Sachverhalt?

Ich finde, dass Abbiegeverbote nur da hingehören, wo sie explizit beschildert sind, ansonsten machen sie nur Ärger :)
Pakun (2022-04-20 12:23:29+00:00): Hallo, 
Ich bin über jedes Hilfreiche "Gemecker" dankbar. :) Hier ist es wie gesagt schwierig. Ich passe es der Realität genau an.
Es handelt sich hier ja um 2 Revisionen. Richtung Lipporn ist die Strasse L333 / K97 tatsächlich sogar durch Große Steine gesperrt. Zwar für Anlieger Frei aber eben versperrt ich habe es mal als Sackgasse eingefügt.
Ich werde folgendes tun. Ich werde die Schilder nun noch einmal Live ansehen und dann der Tatsächlichen Situation anpassen. Dann werde ich es auch ausreichend Editieren (aus allen Richtungen).
FraukeLeo (2022-04-20 13:05:51+00:00): Alles gut :) wenn da Steine rumliegen, ist das jedenfalls keine normale Kreuzung mehr. Du kannst gern auch Fotos machen und irgendwo hochladen. Oder hast du Mapillary? Dann haben sogar alle was davon.
Pakun (2022-04-20 13:08:45+00:00): Hallo ich habe bei Knoten 348115528 Die Abbiegevorschriften ganz herausgenommen. Im Grunde kann man dort einfahren die Zufahrt wird erst ab beginn des Schotters eingeschränkt. Daher ist hier kein direktes Abbiege Verbot nötig.
Russ McD (2022-03-16 02:36:02+00:00): Way: 927152074 & 927152075
mudigonda_1 .... what the heck are you doing ?
At the Mae Rim PTT, you have drawn these ways without checking properly.  It might look like a road in your efforts to flood the map with anything you can find, but these are bad edits.
...971  goes through a gate, has a barrier to stop cars and motorcycles, as it then runs across a pedestrian shopping area.
...075 is the pedestrian area, where people walk safely behind steel bars.  Its a pedestrian pavement !!   
But yet you chose to add as a road, and connect it to the highway.  Can't you see this from aerial images ?
I wish you would check local photos and stop wrecking the CM map with junk data.
You can imagine my concern when I passed the PTT in a pickup truck, and my GPS then directed me through a gap in the shops, and across the pedestrian area.  For a Grab vehicle to do this, the publicity would be terrible.  Just how much more incorrect ways have you added ?
I have corrected your mistakes - please be more careful, or better still, stop mapping.
mudigonda_1 (2022-03-17 14:32:29+00:00): Hi Russ,
Trust you are doing great.
The Road connectivity seems to be a possibility based on the available Esri World Imagery then (April 2021) and we didn't have any street-level imagery to support it. However, Maxar imagery 2022 confirms otherwise. 
We thank you for bringing this up and making the edits as per the reality.

Thanks,
Karthik
Russ McD (2022-03-18 00:55:55+00:00): Thank you for your very polite response - but the fact remains that even from only aerial images, the proximity to the bldgs and the parked cars should have put some doubt into the fact that this was not a road.  Please share this with all Grab mappers and be more careful in the future.
Rgds. Russ
mudigonda_1 (2022-04-18 11:17:26+00:00): Hi Russ,
Thanks for your feedback.
TravGW (2021-04-07 16:23:44+00:00): Why the sudden need to delete these driveways? As far as I can tell these are valid driveways and should not have been deleted.
Puxan (2021-04-07 15:34:23+00:00): I am reviewing the mapping. Inadvertently you have drawn a road segment on an existing road.    
An interesting page to map Africa https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot/West_African_HOT_Mapping_Tips 
https://learnosm.org
keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102479948
hauke-stieler (2021-04-16 22:02:49+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier den einen Parkplatz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234944335) etwas seltsam verformt, war das Absicht?

Grüße
Hauke
szczesal (2021-04-17 13:06:48+00:00): Hi,
das war wohl nicht beabsichtigt. Ich hatte hier eher den südöstlich gelegenen Parkplatz mit Zufahrt bearbeitet. Gruß
Alexander
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 13:09:41+00:00): Alles klar, hab ihn wieder rechteckig gemacht.

Grüß
Hauke
Oguzhan Er (2021-04-14 14:05:11+00:00): building overlapping with another one
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102480675
Becky Candy (2021-05-12 07:59:33+00:00): Great mapping, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102480983
Becky Candy (2021-05-12 07:59:34+00:00): Great mapping, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102480983
Puxan (2021-04-07 15:39:32+00:00): Buildings should not usually be glued together, unless they share the same wall as is the case with buildings in cities. The program tends to paste them when they are very close, to avoid this, try to bring the image closer. Alright, keep mapping. Joaquim
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102481075
mariotomo (2023-08-28 19:32:58+00:00): hi. I find this changeset revising why and who changed Clayton Norte as commercial area. the changeset comment did not suggest the change. please help reviewers with better changeset comments. What is the reason for such change? are there more similar edits in this changeset? I'll check, but your feedback would be highly appreciated.
mariotomo (2023-08-28 19:45:04+00:00): hi again. I see that I was among the editors who had touched this Clayton Norte in the past. I do not recall why I tagged it this way nor why I did not include all of the Ciudad del Saber in the relation.
mariotomo (2023-08-28 19:47:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227711466/history
eggie (2021-04-07 13:49:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback.. Kleinigheidje.  Een brug niet met de oever verbinden, maar er iets overheen laten steken. 


MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Cristoffs (2021-04-08 20:33:12+00:00): Cześć! Nazwy alternatywne opisuje się inaczej proszę sprawdź na wiki. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy)
julcnx (2021-08-07 16:21:55+00:00): Please refrain from adding residential roads inside a religious site. You must use service for roads with any private property/facility/estate. If you are not sure, please do not add/tag. thank you https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102482038
karike_s (2021-08-20 04:35:28+00:00): Hello cmoffroad,

Trust you are well. Thanks for reviewing the data. We will make sure to follow the policy for the rest of the scenarios.

Thank you!
julcnx (2021-08-20 04:43:37+00:00): Thank you, feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the new minor road classification directives in the official Thai wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102482038
user_5359 (2021-04-08 04:30:47+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning (!) of the keys. See https://www.osm.org/way/927160741
xenopus (2021-04-08 08:53:44+00:00): Hi user_5329,

I've just been splitting an old way: The meaningless keys have been at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/626966456/history before and originate from user hsaavedra (inactive) – https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5063233 !
mariotomo (2021-05-01 21:08:48+00:00): hsaavedra is author to various such changesets here in Panamá. In my opinion clearly imports. This one mentions the national geographic institute: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69545350/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 15:26:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120411671/history has amenity = church that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=church? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship - if you meant christian church then then it is taggable by amenity=place_of_worship religion=christian.
Cascafico (2021-04-16 09:02:10+00:00): Credo questa way sia da rimuovere: duplica praticamente tutte le geometrie già presenti in osm.
Becky Candy (2021-05-12 16:08:39+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102482509
Cascafico (2021-04-07 14:38:09+00:00): Typo in source:date, pls read 2021. Sorry.
mmekala (2021-04-09 10:38:08+00:00): Used Bing aerial imagery instead of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102484068
wireguy (2021-04-07 13:37:09+00:00): Hi RackDaddy, welcome to osm!   How is deleting a road 'fixing' it?   It seems to be a real service road added by an Amazon, probably to help in deliveries.   Can you recheck?
RackDaddy (2021-04-07 17:03:05+00:00): I made a few changes to Lane Way as well as removing the service road.  It's actually just a parking lot for the laundry place.
wireguy (2021-04-07 20:14:09+00:00): But they added it for assistance.   Maybe add highway=service, service=parking_aisle (or driveway).   You could outline the parking area and add amenity=parking to show customers they don't need to park on street.