piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2019-01-11 09:47:12+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping. I am reviewing tasks in order to validate them.
A few remarks. Please do not tag buildings with name=building.  building=yes is sufficient. Please pay more attention to square the buildings you mapped. 
Best regards and keep mapping
Roshna0016 (2018-10-31 06:07:04+00:00): JPMC India (Bangalore)
flohoff (2018-10-31 09:10:58+00:00): Weil ich das zufällig mit geladen hatte:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4293687391

Warum hat das barrier=gate eine adresse? Und die tonnen an access tags verstehe ich nicht und die wiedersprechen sich auch.

Mit eine motor_vehicle darf ich da durch ansonsten ist das permissive? 

Ich denke die ganzen tags könnnen da alle komplett runter. 

Flo
freebeer (2019-05-13 21:08:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70209388 where the changeset comment is: fake maps.me bogus home castles with personal info
SomeoneElse (2018-10-31 08:16:26+00:00): Hello,
Would it be possible to use more meaningful changeset comments here?
"Back" doesn't really explain what was changed, the source of the change or the reason behind it.
Best regards,
Andy
flohoff (2018-10-31 09:08:02+00:00): Moin,
ich habe die Tore mal da hingeschoben wo sie im Luftbild zu sehen sind. 
Die waren ein wenig jeweils auf die beiden Straßen gerutscht.

Ansonsten alles gut.

Flo
abakus_uploader (2018-10-31 23:30:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Andrea Musuruane (2018-11-04 16:18:55+00:00): Ciao, mi sembra che Cornaley sia il nome di una località mentre Maria Ausiliatrice si riferisca a un luogo di culto. In OSM non mettiamo mai abbreviazioni, quindi come valore del tag name dovresti inserire "Chiesa della Madonna Ausiliatrice" (o analogo). Le località invece si inseriscono con il tag place. Maggiori informazioni sulla wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Map_Features Ciao, Andrea
HubMiner (2019-04-02 18:15:46+00:00): You really should tell the mapper if they keep making the same mistake. Thanks for catching this. :)
diskmanti (2018-11-01 11:14:26+00:00): vura re qe ke hedhur shume supermarket ne tirnae dhe te pergezoje. Te lutem te kesh me shume kujdes se cfare atributesh vendos per secilin supermarket, sigurohu qe ke vendosur te gjitha te dhenat e sakta dhe qe nuk ke bere ndonje dyfishim te pikave.
대왕판다 (2018-10-31 08:46:46+00:00): Hossein, please don't destroy the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8200747 again and again. When you change a boundary ( visualize it e.g. with https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64035487 ) you must add all new pieces to the relation.
Navid Hosseinzadeh (2018-11-05 15:30:32+00:00): سلام تغییراتی که دادین مرز ها رو خراب و ناقص کرده.
dcapillae_old (2018-10-31 07:30:32+00:00): He fusionado áreas de uso de suelo residencial. Estaban adyacentes unas a otras y se podían fusionar todas en un único elemento OSM.
mavl (2019-02-21 17:29:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Multi Pass (2018-11-01 10:18:26+00:00): Hello,
Just letting you know that the node you created for Burnie Primary School is redundant because the school is already represented by an area.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393065438
Any further details, such as address, should be added to the area instead.
Cheers,
Lee.
Multi Pass (2018-11-01 10:33:53+00:00): I noticed a few other school nearby were the same (some made by me a few years ago), so I have fixed them.
mavl (2018-10-31 16:36:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64051544 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source Yandex Maps].
osmviborg (2018-10-31 08:19:08+00:00): Please use "SDFE luftfoto" when editing in Denmark.
jaggededge (2018-11-01 08:13:05+00:00): I've used SDFE Imagery but unknowing added source as bing, thanks for the caution
Omnific (2018-10-31 15:41:37+00:00): Cheers, I'm behind.
ajf3934221 (2018-10-31 19:09:23+00:00): Hallo, solange die Hausnummern noch nicht feststehen fände ich es besser wenn die aktuelle Benennung (Haus 1, Haus 2, ...) erhalten bleiben würde. Diese entspricht der Internen Benennung innerhalb der Baustelle bzw. Wohnanlage. Dies erleichtert somit die Kommunikation. Von mir aus auch als loc_name oder ähnliches. 

Weiterhin sollte überlegt werden ob dieses Quartier den Namen Belle Vallee bekommen sollte? Bitte kommentieren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64037165
Negreheb (2018-10-31 09:27:11+00:00): Hallo iglat, 

die Öffnungszeiten sind leider für OSM nicht ganz korrekt - siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours . Es gibt aber ganz lässige Editoren, damit man sich die Syntax nicht auswendig merken muss, meine beiden Empfehlungen sind http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ oder http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?setLng=en - wobei ich ersteren lieber mag :)
jmapb (2019-05-08 16:04:03+00:00): Seriously? Why do I bother adding a fixme if you're just going to ignore it and delete it? Please communicate with local mappers, don't just override them blindly. Thanks, jmapb
eggie (2018-10-31 08:55:54+00:00): Top!
abakus_uploader (2018-10-31 23:30:21+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
pyram (2018-11-03 22:48:02+00:00): review http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=64038243 :
Hello jiyasen26,
thank you for contributing.
You changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455315311 to living_street ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway ) = "way for living streets, which are residential streets where pedestrians have legal priority over cars, speeds are kept very low and where children are allowed to play on the street."
And as oneway from north to south all way long (no vehicles from south to north allowed?). Are you shure?

Best regards
pyram
mavl (2018-10-31 16:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64051544 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source Yandex Maps].
dval (2019-03-08 10:41:15+00:00): Здравствуйте! Адреса по Шадринской есть, а улицы самой не видно. Желательно с этим разобраться разобраться. http://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-SVE/addr/3
AkuAnakTimur (2018-10-31 09:28:58+00:00): Playground ada tag khusus dalam OpenStreetMap

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=playground
Fahmi Repro (2018-11-14 04:39:40+00:00): yg ni patut tag park or playground?
Fahmi Repro (2018-11-14 04:40:11+00:00): or recreation ground?
AkuAnakTimur (2018-11-14 05:49:46+00:00): Kalau sekadar tempat lapang... petang-petang orang datang main, boleh kira recreation ground.

leisure=park kalau ada macam-macam, contohnya ada taman permainan sekali dengan lorong joging, court takraw/badminton, ada bangku, dan macam-macam.
osmviborg (2018-10-31 10:07:49+00:00): De bygninger du har flyttet ud mod Retortvej, og de nye du har tegnet, det er 5-6 meter for langt mod vest. Jeg ved ikke hvad du tegner efter, men det er ikke godt.
Jesper Mortensen (2018-10-31 13:49:14+00:00): Jeg tegner efter kommunens tegninger. Jeg er enig i, at grundlaget kunne være mere præcist, men vil alligevel mene at det er væsentligt bedre end de alternativer der er på nuværende tidspunkt. Du er velkommen til at flytte bygningerne, ellers gør jeg det når et bedre grundlag er på plads
osmviborg (2018-10-31 14:31:54+00:00): Jeg ser på 2018 ortofoto. Du kan selv se med her: https://servicelist.kortforsyningen.dk/show_sample.aspx?maptype=WMS&servicename=orto_foraar_temp&layerselector=true&screenmode=newwin
~Jhellico (2018-11-01 06:19:51+00:00): Навіщо видалені полігони шкіл?
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
rene78 (2018-10-31 10:14:26+00:00): start_date ist mit Sicherheit falsch. Vielleicht weiss das jemand und kann es korrigieren.
GerdP (2018-11-01 06:26:47+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed the way with typo highway=unclassfied , the correct spelling would be unclassified (two i). Anyway, the way was not connected to other roads, so I've downgraded it to track. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
陳沛丞 (2018-11-06 10:45:08+00:00): It's my misstake, I edited a road on JOSM but typing wrong then.
Thanks fo your correcting.
BladeTC (2020-03-06 21:52:33+00:00): Looks like your node/1 was deleted again, changeset #81743100.
SomeoneElse (2020-03-07 12:12:04+00:00): Thanks - I've commented at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81743100 already.  Node 1 has been lots of things over the years - see http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=1 - I'm sure it'll get resurrected at some point and used again (by accident or design).  If I remember correctly, the reason I reverted it in this changeset was that it was still part of a way, and that way was left extending from London to Scotland and back again.
Best Regards,
Andy
aceman444 (2019-02-14 12:54:36+00:00): Zdravim, prosim neprespisujte spravne znacenie priechodov crossing=uncontrolled+crossing_ref=zebra na nespravne crossing=zebra. Nicite presne udaje menej presnymi.
Dakujem.
pepeinvest (2018-11-01 07:04:18+00:00): pepe.srl
viloan (2018-10-31 10:30:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
yumean1119 (2018-10-31 16:34:19+00:00): Thank you very much for mapping for #hotosm-project-4908. I reviewed this changeset. Your mapping are great except for one thing: buildings should be  orthogonalized(squared). You can do it by pressing Q key in JOSM. Happy mapping!
yumean1119 (2018-10-31 17:39:00+00:00): I squared some of your buildings in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64054083
Next time, try to square buildings for yourself.
Aury88 (2018-11-18 18:41:18+00:00): come già spiegato nella versione precedente il fiume nel tratto in questione ha il nome disueri. a seguito del suo sbarramento il lago, come usualmente, assume i nome del fiume sbarrato da cui il lago disueri. la cosa è spiegata anche nella pagina wiki che hai rimosso con il tuo ultimo edit. quanto meno spiega il tuo edit quando rimuovi informazioni. ripristino
Aury88 (2018-11-18 19:38:52+00:00): aggiungo che mentre il nome "Fiume Disueri" è elencato tra i fiumi del sito "Difesambiente", "fiumi.com" oltre che a comparire sulla pagina wikipedia del fume Gela (ha anche una voce sua) del fiume della porcheria si fa accenno solo nella su citata voce, se ne fa cenno in maniera vaga nella zona di mazzarino (assieme alla vecchia denominazione più a valle nel territorio mazzarinese di "fiume di cassari") è in maniera più precisa come confine del "latifondo folosofiana" posto poco più a nord ...cioè tutti dati storici antichi e che fanno riferimento ad un altra area. gli unici che pongono li quel nome è una mappa militare risaputa contenere una infinità di errori in termini di nomi locali e comunque il cui utilizzo su osm non è consentito per problemi di licenza
aldoct (2018-11-19 07:48:41+00:00): Chiedo scusa per qualche inesattezza: il problema nasce per me in quanto tratto una quantità di dati notevole e spesso mi imbatto in mappatori, a dir poco, spericolati! Mi è sfuggito che i dati in questione siano stati inseriti da te che so essere preciso e documentato, In genere quando rilevo qualcosa che non mi convince inserito da qualcuno che conosco lo contatto, piuttosto che correggere. Per quanto riguarda l'intermittenza dei torrenti, essendo un dato aleatorio (stagioni più o meno piovose/asciutte) attribuisco il tag ai toponimi "torrenti", lasciando la continuità di portata ai "fiumi". Un'altra questione riguarda le fonti. Utilizzo come fonte ufficiale i toponimi delle IGM che mi risulta siano state le ultime ad essere verificate sul territorio; mentre le successive CTR sono zeppe di refusi. Per quanto riguarda la licenza di utilizzo, penso che il toponimo faccia parte del nostro bagaglio culturale: una volta acquisito studiando le IGM ritengo possa essere riutilizzato liberamente ...o no?
Grazie per la collaborazione e mi scuso ancora per l'inconveniente. Fammi sapere cosa ne pensi.
 Saluti, Aldo
Aury88 (2018-11-20 16:54:22+00:00): Ciao aldo;
 non devi basarti sul fatto che ho inserito io l'elemento, ma in generale se si tolgono tag e non ci sono evidenti errori, sarebbe meglio provare a contattare il mappatore precedente; a meno che tu non sia sicuro, con dati  di "prima mano", dell'informazione modificata/rimossa. per quanto riguarda l'uso delle mappe coperte da licenza alcuni la pensano come te, ma a quel punto non avrebbe senso avere le licenze se basta consultare una mappa coperta da copyright  per fare diventare le informazioni acquisite un bagaglio culturale personale e quindi liberamente ri-utilizzabile. il fatto è che quel bagaglio culturale lo hai acquisito da una unica fonte, non stai usando la mappa per rinfrescare un informazione acquisita per conto tuo. inoltre le mappe contengono errori alcuni involontari altri voluti. tutti questi errori sono spesso usati come prova di violazioni del copyright in quanto la fonte del dato diventa comprovata ed unica... e al giudice basta questo. 
lo scopo delle IGM era dare dei punti di riferimento alle forze armate, quindi non è detto che abbiano associato il nome corretto a brevi tratti del fiume se non era necessario un tale livello di dettaglio; inoltre non è detto che i nomi siano stati dati a seguito di un sopralluogo o se semplicemente non siano frutto, la dove non aggiornate, di un riutilizzo di vecchi dati (so di comuni in cui le mappe "aggiornate" avevano ancora in vari tratti i dati delle mappe napoleoniche). essendo quelle in oggetto aree non urbanizzate non so quanto possano essere ritenute corrette...come non posso esserlo ritenute le mie fonti (un po' di conoscenza locale, un po' di ricerca bibliografica e un po' di logica) quindi il problema rimane anche con la mia interpretazione.
ciao!
GerdP (2018-11-01 06:54:32+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped a small part of a highway here as highway=unclasswified. The correct spelling is unclassified but this road is rather a highway=residential. I've connected it to the next major road and also added some nodes in the north. Please review my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64068189
Hope this helps, happy mapping!
andrewwiseman (2018-12-11 00:37:48+00:00): Hi, i think you moved these roads by mistake. Please be careful.
flohoff (2018-10-31 11:41:11+00:00): Moin Anne,
in diesem changeset hasz du auf dem Gebäude ein amenity=child_care gesetzt. Das ist jetzt ein amenity in amenity. Das amenity=kindergarten ist schon da und umfasst das gesamte Gelände des Kindergartens. Auf dem Gebäude bedarf es keines amenities.

So long,

Flo
flohoff (2018-10-31 11:41:53+00:00): Ach ja - Und das building=kindergarten war schon richtig auf dem Gebäude. D.h. das Gesamtgelände amenity=kindergarten und auf den Gebäudeteilen building=kindergarten aber kein amenity mehr.

Flo
anne_1212 (2018-10-31 20:46:22+00:00): Ok. jetzt weiß ich auch, wo das von dir beschriebene amety=child_care sitzt... Ich hatte es auf der Karte gesehen, aber nicht mit dem Gelände in Verbindung gebracht. Danke.
Und auch gleich noch eine Frage: dann kommen Name etc. an das Gelände. Ist das richtig?
Und was passiert mit der Adresse, die üblicherweise ja auch am Gebäude ist? Sollte dann auch an das Gelände, damit die Relation von Adresse und Name erhalten bleibt?
Danke für ein Rückmeldung
flohoff (2018-11-01 11:24:57+00:00): 
Genau - der name kommt an das objekt mit dem amenity - Weil es ist ja der Kindergarten mit dem namen "XYZ" - Die Adresse würde ich auf das Gebäude und das amenity packen. Das ist nen bischen unschön im moment weil dann die adresse 2 mal existiert. Aber gut - so isses halt. Die Adresse wird ja von Amts wegen dem Gebäude zugeteilt eigentlich. 

Flo
GerdP (2018-11-01 06:37:30+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this changeset because of the typo highway=unclassifed. The correct spelling is unclassified (two i)
I think most of them are in fact highway=path or highway=residential and
some are not connected. A good sample for an unclassified road is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333507120 because it is the way to the next residential area.
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Hope this helps, happy mapping!
Omnific (2018-10-31 15:40:47+00:00): Yeah, I'm going to have to revert this too. This is on a church and in the completely wrong place.
eggie (2018-10-31 11:18:03+00:00): Dag Desmond.. ik zie dat je de BING gebruikt als achtergrond, maar deze ligt ernstig verschoven. Beter is het om de PDOK luchtfoto te gebruiken. Dat kan ook in editor iD. 
Nog beter is het om over te schakelen naar edtor JOSM, waar veel meer achtergrondmogelijkheden zijn zoals de BGT omtrekgericht.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       


MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-31 11:30:27+00:00): Het ligt overigens allemaal keurig op z'n plaats.
sergeybe (2018-11-07 03:29:45+00:00): Вы опять начали дубли делать на карте?
viloan (2018-10-31 10:55:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Владимир К (2019-10-28 08:15:24+00:00): Добрый день!
Пожалуйста, не используйте тег crossing=zebra 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing 
вот тут написано почему этого не надо делать.
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
kartonage (2018-10-31 15:15:38+00:00): Hallo tilsch,
versuchst du mit dem key/tag "historic=building" den Denkmalschutz auszudrücken?
Dafür gibt es etwas geeigneter das heritage-tag mit den passenden Untertags. Vielleicht kannst du es dir ja mal anschauen, das ist dann nämlich auch entsprechend detailiert und spiegelt die Informationen aus der Denkmalkarte besser wider.
//
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:heritage
//
Beispielanwendung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243911457

Bei Fragen gern nachhaken.

Schöne Grüße
tilsch (2018-11-01 14:46:58+00:00): Vielen Dank, das habe ich auch gesehen. Heritage ist komplex. Leider kann man nicht mal eben schnell taggen, dass etwas unter Denkmalschutz steht. Man muss immer wissen, wer es unter Schutz gestellt hat. Dann schaue ich mal nach auf der Denkmalkarte.
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:19:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
Andrea Musuruane (2018-11-04 15:42:47+00:00): Ciao. Che cos'è quest'area? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639674563 Ciao, Andrea
fantomharlock (2018-11-04 16:45:51+00:00): Ciao,
uno è un negozio di strumenti, l'altro un fabbricato, non so se casa o altro: ho sbagliato a tracciarlo, pensando che fosse il negozio, e poi l'ho comunque lasciato
Andrea Musuruane (2018-11-04 16:49:23+00:00): Se è un fabbricato allora lo devi indicare con building=yes e non con area=yes. Ciao, Andrea
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].