piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
evo_evz (2017-11-06 08:02:16+00:00): I chose a good one for my first go! Yeah I finally figured out that I needed the from, via and to relation. You don't seem to be able to configure a mandatory restriction using the diagrams I sent you in the screenshots, only prohibitory restrictions.

I ran into problems configuring the to relation on the Kingsway because that segment of the Kingsway, when highlighted, continued both left and right. After you fixed it up I noticed you must have split Kingsway at that point because it is now split.

So I had a go at the other southbound left turn only and tried to split the Kingsway but instead of splitting I disconnected it which has caused the Kingsway to disappear in the diagram when selecting the node. I merged them together but the Kingsway still does not appear. Sorry mate might need your help again.

I'll get there just need a bit more training. If you know of good video tutorials let me know. I believe I could make good contributions so they would be helpful. Going to download JOSM and learn how to use it well. Many thanks.
aharvey (2017-11-06 09:31:41+00:00): No worries, try this guid https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/adding-turn-restrictions/. http://learnosm.org/en/ is also a good entry point for guides.

Yeah I had to split the way to add the turn restriction. Definitely try JOSM it's much better for relations. There you can fix up the southbound on Willarong relation. PS. you've duplicated the node so you'll need to fix that up in josm.
evo_evz (2017-11-06 20:08:45+00:00): I cleaned up that southbound left turn only rule into Kingsway. It looks just the same as the one you did opposite in regards to the relations. Have a look please if you don't mind. I'm not convinced it's correct because the one you did opposite is reflected in the diagram with a blue arrow where you can turn left and red arrows straight through and U Turn. The one I did heading south does not reflect the Left Turn Only rule in the diagram like yours does and no matter how much I toggle them the arrow wont go blue.
aharvey (2017-11-07 22:33:24+00:00): Getting closer... currently you have the members correct but spread across three relations for the left turn only each with a different member, but you need one relation with three members.

Try JOSM, it's much easier when working with relations and turn restrictions.

These are the 3:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7713776
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7712221
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7707282

but it should only be one like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7707084

https://ibb.co/hg20iG
evo_evz (2017-11-08 07:47:56+00:00): Finally! Ok I have used 7712221 which was the to relation for all members. 7713776 and 7717282 should be deleted. I'm pretty sure it's correct now but you better check my work. Thanks heaps for your help.
aharvey (2017-11-08 10:12:52+00:00): Looks fine, good job! There's plenty more missing turn restriction in OSM that are just waiting to be added.
evo_evz (2017-11-08 23:39:42+00:00): Great. It took a while but I got there in the end! Anything I see wrong driving or hiking around will be corrected. Thanks again.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-04 10:57:11+00:00): Hello. Your edits don't make any sense. Please stop editing and contact me if you need help. There are no roads here.
Russ McD (2018-10-27 13:50:19+00:00): Way 538104523 - Hi Alexandra Teixeira... I'm reaching out to you too ... just wondering why when you added this rather important Link road/U turn on the 103, that you ignored the other one next to it, which is equally as important.
In fact, while you were there, you say you are keen to improve the map, so is there any reason why you didn't draw the bridges on the 103, where your link road passed under.  Or delete the residential road that clearly can't connect to a bridge in mid-air. Or just make an attempt the draw the 103 along its correct lines.
It's just such a half arsed job, Im afraid, but dont worry .. the Thai mappers are working overtime to fix the Facebook cavalier mapping.
Russ McD (2018-10-27 13:55:05+00:00): I have fixed this now, so don't fret.
chrislybaer (2017-11-05 14:16:44+00:00): Hallo felkel1982,
Gibt es einen Grund dafür, dass du aus diesem Teilstück den ref-Tag rausgelöscht hast?
viele Grüße,
Chris
felkel1982 (2017-11-05 15:23:55+00:00): Ganz einfach, die Strassenbezeichnung verdeckte die ganze Straße. Was bringt einem der Name, wenn man die Straße nicht sieht.
PT-53 (2017-11-06 09:55:42+00:00): Das ist natürlich ein sehr gewichtiges Argument und zeigt wieder einmal Dein (nicht vorhandenes) Qualitätsbewußtsein.
Nach dem Neubau der Ortsumfahrung dürfte die Zollstraße keine Kreisstraße mehr sein und wohl eher als unclassified einzustufen sein. Dazu sollte man aber Ortskenntnisse haben, um das abschließend Beurteilen zu können.
highflyer74 (2017-11-06 10:21:59+00:00): @Felkel1982: Schau Dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice an. Da findet sich unter "Beim Attributieren nicht danach richten, was der Renderer daraus macht" die Erklärung für unsere Kritik.
highflyer74 (2017-11-06 10:28:32+00:00): @felkel1982: Interessant könnte für Dich auch folgendes sein: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments, da Du leider prinzipiell keine CS Kommentare schreibst. Das ist gegenüber Deinen Mit-Mappern nicht nett und wird immer wieder zu Rückfragen führen.
aceman444 (2017-11-25 22:48:42+00:00): Dobry den, cesta 538104826 nie je urobena dobre. Nemozete nakreslit novu cyklotrasu ponad uz existujucu cestu. Treba upravit vlastnosti existujucich ciest, ak sa tam odporuca vjazd cyklistom (napr. bicycle=designated). Alebo ak tam len vyznacili cyklotrasu, treba existujuce cesty doplnit do relacie (ale napr. Ponitrianska cyklomagistrala tam uz je).
Ak vybudovali samostatny cyklopruh, ktory je oddeleny od cesty ci existujuceho chodnika, potom mozete urobit samostatnu cestu (ciaru) ale nie presne identicku s existujucou, ale vedla nej. To ste vsak neurobili. Prosim opravte, inak budem musiet cestu 538104826 celu vymazat.
aceman444 (2018-06-15 20:25:22+00:00): Kedze bez odpovede, tak som cestu odstranil.
dmdak (2017-11-04 11:25:55+00:00): Hallo Correctmapper.
Da habe ich mich wohl auf eim Terrain begeben, ohne sich richtig auszukennen. Du hast recht, ich bin ein blutiger Anfänger. Und ich nehme es nicht böse, sondern bin dankbar für die Tipps und die Links... 
dann habe ich doch noch einiges zu lesen, bevor ich loslegen kann...
dmdak (2017-11-04 11:26:54+00:00): Viele Grüße aus Odendorf... ;o)
pitscheplatsch (2017-11-04 10:29:28+00:00): Hi geo_roads, is it correct, that this changeset is a revert of the following changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53473439 ?
geo_roads (2017-11-07 00:39:21+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch. Yes, these changes were made to fix problems with changeset 53473439. arugula3 added these buildings twice so I removed the extra ones.
Omegatherion (2017-11-05 11:17:55+00:00): Ich bezweifel, dass die Fahrradständer eine Adresse haben. Bitte löschen.
dermontag (2017-11-06 09:48:34+00:00): Da hast Du wohl recht, habe ich gelöscht
Omegatherion (2017-11-05 11:15:26+00:00): Wenn die nicht öffentlich zugänglich sind, sollte der Node gelöscht werden.
Nakaner-repair (2017-11-05 16:39:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53533087 where the changeset comment is: Revert two changesets by Maria_5555 which contain deletions of landuse areas because the project coordinator wanted buildings to be mapped. #hotrepair
pitscheplatsch (2017-11-04 10:38:56+00:00): Hi Maria_5555, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings which have been mapped by a different contributor yesterday? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53492704
Maria_5555 (2017-11-04 11:03:34+00:00): hi pitscheplatsch, off course! The reason is because in the task it was asked to only map residential areas and especialy not to map seperate buildings. Also because Frans S requested this too in the comments. I only tried to help, since there was a high request of validators in this task, but maybe it's better i'll stay mapping for the time being..
Nakaner (2017-11-04 11:14:31+00:00): Hi Maria_5555,

we usually call the deletion of features which exist on the ground "vandalism". Our usual response is a revert of the changeset. I am going to revert this changeset for that reason.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2017-11-05 16:39:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53533087 where the changeset comment is: Revert two changesets by Maria_5555 which contain deletions of landuse areas because the project coordinator wanted buildings to be mapped. #hotrepair
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-04 11:03:36+00:00): This edit is a bit better than most of your edits. You have added valid buildings. Thanks.
bxl-forever (2018-09-29 06:44:08+00:00): Hello,
This is a strange edit and many values you inserted into the database seem either misguided or made up.  I fear I might have to revert them.  My recent surveys almost always contradict those. 
Are there really 65 kph speed limit signs in Brussels on some roads, seriously?
Arma IRM-ED (2021-04-20 05:58:34+00:00): Hi, Oreg. Thanks for your mapping.

Please have a look at this highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/538115664). I think that's not a highway, it's a canal. So, I have deleted it.

And I also modified this highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/538115665).

If I did wrong, please let me know. Let's discuss it. Thank you.
Carnildo (2017-11-04 06:18:30+00:00): I've re-tagged the shooting range using standard tags, so it'll show up on maps.  Does it have a name?
mbethke (2017-11-09 15:39:36+00:00): Hi,
thanks for your additions to OSM! Do you think you could find out the names of the places you added? It would help with searching.

cheers,
Matthias
CloCkWeRX (2017-11-27 03:58:09+00:00): Aitken Boulevard is visible now on Esri imagery at zoom 19, appears to be dual direction road
Chetan_Gowda (2017-11-06 06:39:42+00:00): Hi distomen, 
I have lot of turn restrictions applied to this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499051553/history, are they really exists on the ground? 
Thanks,
Chetan
ditsomen (2017-11-06 14:52:03+00:00): The road is blocked by a fence that is not accessible from outside from Jackson Hwy orfrom Canbrerra Way. It is in an apartment building and there is no access. 
Many times i order delivery and they attempt to go that way having to go around many streets to exit. It should not be connected from both sides as its a parking lot.
user_5359 (2017-11-04 11:14:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better descrption of your business please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmusic_school.
woodpeck_repair (2017-12-04 09:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54322536 where the changeset comment is: revert all 'Zowie Polie' edits because of continued vandalism.
lleung (2017-11-09 05:41:59+00:00): man_made=tower 是塔，子类型包括通信塔、暸望塔、灯塔、钟楼等等（见https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:type）。你将高层建筑的类型修改为“塔”不太合适。
compdude (2017-11-19 07:52:53+00:00): Please stop adding false data to the map. If  this continues, you WILL get banned.
DannyMcD (2017-11-10 20:06:26+00:00): This edit appears to have broken the 162 bus route relation.
The problem is that if you
1. download a way into JOSM without downloading any referring relations
2. split the way
Any referring relations will only contain one of the split ways, not both.  For a route relation, this will create a gap.

This is a known bug in JOSM (see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/4142).  I only found out about it after breaking several relations myself (including the Canada relation).

By the way, this sidewalk tagging is great.
zzptichka (2017-11-10 21:57:35+00:00): Ah that's what's happening. I see.
I think I broke a few routes in Kitchissippi as well.
I'll keep an eye on it in the future. Thanks for the heads up.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:29:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:50:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:18:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:04:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:38:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:49:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
pitscheplatsch (2017-11-04 10:32:28+00:00): Hi Mộng Cầm, welcome to OSM. This changeset contains some ficitve data. Could you please revert it? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53495036
user_6328178 (2018-02-03 09:36:35+00:00): Please consider remove Way #538135582 with leisure=park tag, as it is not a park based on local knowledge.
TheSwavu (2018-10-27 07:01:24+00:00): Is there any particular reason why you felt the need to delete Werri Beach?
mavl (2018-12-25 19:53:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:38:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-11-04 11:11:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:58:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:47:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Something B (2018-10-14 22:36:55+00:00): Здравствуйте, Александр!
 Для помещений, где люди оставляют свою верхнюю одежду (если это тот случай), больше подходит amenity=cloakroom https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcloakroom искомая линия http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202773397
С уважением, 
Something B.
Alexander-II (2018-10-15 08:58:52+00:00): Привет!  

Ух, ты! Гардеробная. Спасибо, что рассказали про такое тег.
Something B (2018-10-15 09:09:55+00:00): Пожалуйста :-)
mavl (2018-12-25 21:13:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:58:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:50:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:23:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:04:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:35:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:46:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:10:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:09:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:49:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:40:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:08:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:38:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:21:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].