piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SK53 (2020-03-07 20:51:39+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Yes Ruislip Woods (as you describe) is a National Nature Reserve, so can be added as a leisure=nature_reserve. See MAGIC (there is an open data set for NNR): https://magic.defra.gov.uk/MagicMap.aspx?chosenLayers=nnrIndex,backdropDIndex,backdropIndex,europeIndex,vmlBWIndex,25kBWIndex,50kBWIndex,250kBWIndex,miniscaleBWIndex,baseIndex&box=504338:187878:511071:191141&useDefaultbackgroundMapping=false. 

My Aunt used to live very close to the woods.

Jerry
Wisdom!! (2020-03-05 11:44:39+00:00): Hi, hope u like motorway, but i think motorway does not and should not have any roundabouts like this, its a kind of freeway only passing through the outskirts of the city, unlike the way you have assigned it in a city
andrewwiseman (2020-03-05 22:55:08+00:00): I agree with Wisdom!!, I don't think this should be a motorway per the OSM highway guidelines
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
Timmy_Tesseract (2020-03-21 01:58:19+00:00): This specific segment of the davao coastal road is not even under construction yet. May I ask what led you to upgrade it to tertiary?
flohoff (2025-02-26 12:24:22+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier die Hausnummer der Mühlheimer 18 in Hegelstraße 2 geändert - Die Montessorischule behauptet aber immer noch in der Mühlheimer 18 zu sein - Ausserdem sagt das ALKIS NRW das auch das dieses Gebäude die 18 ist.

Jetzt gibts einen Note eines Users:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4641570

Ist das vielleicht ein Fehler?

Flo
MKnight (2020-08-20 10:10:55+00:00): Moin,
Du hast hier an living_streets maxspeed=30 angefügt. Das kann SO nicht korrekt sein.
Deranderelalala (2020-08-20 13:43:47+00:00): Hey,
ich bin neu dabei und mache deswegen vielleicht noch Fehler, die bald nicht mehr auftreten. Kannst Du mir erklären, was daran nicht stimmen kann? In diesem Ort ist nämlich tatsächlich ein Tempolimit von 30km/h.
MKnight (2020-08-20 15:22:55+00:00): Moin,
in living_streets gibt es kein explizites maxspeed, sondern es gilt Schrittgeschwindigkeit (die ist auch nicht explizit festgelegt).
Wenn da eine Geschwindigjeit ausgeschildert ist, dann können es keine living_streets (so genannte "Spielstrasse") sein.
Deranderelalala (2020-08-26 12:36:58+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis und die Erklärung! Ich habe das angepasst.
MapMakerGal (2020-03-05 17:21:35+00:00): Buenas, has eliminado este nodo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1459284623/history#map=19/43.37255/-8.38250
Que era de la parroquia.
Bmrf1974 (2020-03-05 17:36:05+00:00): Hola, si es un error. Voy a ver si lo recupero. Gracias
MapMakerGal (2020-03-05 17:42:03+00:00): Si quieres lo hago yo, como veas :)
Bmrf1974 (2020-03-05 17:43:14+00:00): Si, mil gracias.
MapMakerGal (2020-03-05 17:44:52+00:00): A ti por la comprensión!
tastrax (2020-03-22 03:07:04+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM - Cheers
Jordi MF (2020-03-05 18:20:32+00:00): Hola,

Gracias por mejorar los datos de OpenStreetMap. He visto que has añadido centros culturales en forma de nodos en OSM. Sin embargo, no has añadido la etiqueta que especifica qué tipo de centro cultural es (museo, centro cultural, etc.). He añadido la información para La Bohemia y para el IVAM-CADA Alcoi. (tourism=museum). Ten en cuenta que esta información es importante cuando añadas cualquier Punto de Interés en OSM. Si no, aunque hayas añadido el nombre y la dirección, las aplicaciones que usan los datos de OSM no sabrán si ese Punto de Interés se trata de un restaurante, un museo o lo que sea.

Muchas gracias y buen mapeo.
Jordi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
Frans S (2020-03-23 16:25:12+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping here.
A request. Please map buildings individual. Do not cluster a group of buildings and call it 1 building
Best regards and keep mapping
mikkolukas (2020-04-09 01:09:42+00:00): Bortset fra at det er forkert brug af railway=light_rail

For at være railway=light_rail, skal der være aktive jerbaneoverskæringer og afskærmning fra anden trafik. Så snart den indgår i blandet trafik er det railway=tram.
mikkolukas (2020-04-09 01:28:29+00:00): Have been corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83275997
Warin61 (2020-03-06 06:43:34+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM!

That is a nice try at mapping some detail in the parking area! Very good, but it can be better.  

First the areas mapped as leisure=park? Not really a park is it? More like grass, so landuse=grass .. unfortunately ... OSM has some inconsistencies and this is one, grass is not really a land use but there we are ... OSM uses it. 

Next problem. The way in which th enorthern and southern grass areas are mapped. The way intercepts itself. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.52591&lat=-38.58893&zoom=18. What you can do is map one of them as a simple small rectangle, then copy and paste it to the other areas. 

Next problem. The parking area should not include the grassed areas .. as they are not used for parking. 

A simple node with amenity=parking is what most beginners do. Well done for doing more! Don't worry about the details too much, the above suggestions should take care of them.
andrewwiseman (2020-03-05 22:58:39+00:00): Hello. I don't believe this should be a motorway. Motorways are only roads with controlled access, which means there should be no at-grade intersections or roundabouts:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway
Users have pointed this out to you before: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62660268#map=10/40.5724/44.8645
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79723444
andrewwiseman (2020-03-05 22:59:39+00:00): Here are some regular intersections, for example, which would suggest it is not a motorway https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/40.17546/44.50013
MapMakerGal (2020-03-05 17:26:44+00:00): Grazas polos teus cambios. Son bastante bos, o único que non está ben é que este nó non pode levar parénteses:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1776517292/history
Os nomes de vilas e aldeas non levan parénteses, grazas.
MapMakerGal (2020-03-05 17:27:13+00:00): PD: Xa foi eliminado, non te preocupes :)
eggie (2020-03-05 12:36:29+00:00): Hi... in that case remove oneway: bicycle and moped=no

Gr Eggie
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-03-06 00:07:00+00:00): boa noite, os elementos no OpenStreetMap não devem ser eliminados, deverá eliminar as etiquetas e deixar o elemento. Este elemento já estava no OSM há 11 anos, a sua edição pura e simplesmente fez com que deixasse de existir, retirando a posibilidade de verificar o histórico do elemento.

Edição revertida
BikePC (2020-03-06 16:23:27+00:00): De tags bicycle=no, horse=no en motor_vehicle=no zijn overbodig op een highway=footway, tenzij er expliciet officiele verkeersborden staan. Beetje zinloos dit micro-mappen op een voetpad op prive-terrein.
PS. horse=no staat ook op de voetpaden NO van het kentalis gebouw. Kunnen ook weg, tenzij er een expliciet verkeersbord staat, hetgeen ik betwijfel.
literan (2020-03-17 11:18:24+00:00): нет, это не поможет. Тег неверный стоял - railway=stop вместо railway=halt
user_242798 (2020-03-05 13:35:51+00:00): OSM HISTORY:
1. highway=motorway_link (default: bicycle=no)
2. highway=trunk (default: bicycle=no)
3. highway=trunk + (bicycle=no) (default)
4. highway=trunk -/- (bicycle=no)
5. highway=primary (default: bicycle=YES)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions
https://i.postimg.cc/28Ygmd2w/highway-mororway-link-bicycle-no-highway-trunk-bicy.png
Summarized:
1. DELETING NEEDLESS TAGS (which is also needless and risky!) 
2. ERROR Changing into [highway=primary): MISSING ACCESS TAGS.
3. RESULT: ERROR ON THE MAP (bicycle is yes by default).
redd (2022-09-01 18:39:48+00:00): Hi mitubato,
thanks for your contributions to Openstreetmap!
Can you have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778552139 again, please?
There you mixed the area=yes into the roof shape.
Thanks,
redd
aceman444 (2020-09-06 18:09:15+00:00): Zdravim, tu prelozku uz realne stavaju?
Lebo ako zdroj uvadzate ESRI a Bing, ale na tychto snimkach nie je nic vidiet a uz vobec nie cislo buducej cesty (68).
A prosim trochu zmysluplnejsie popisy zmien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn . Dakujem
Michpet (2020-09-07 03:45:53+00:00): Ano cesta je vo vystavbe, mapove podklady su staré.
aceman444 (2020-09-07 20:22:43+00:00): Dobre dakujem. Trochu som Vam to opravil, hlavne napr. cislo cesty sa dava do znacky 'ref', ako ste mohli skopirovat z existujucej cesty 68.
Kovoschiz (2020-03-05 19:32:28+00:00): Ok look, I'm not saying you are wrong, but we can satisfy both aspects at the same time. However, this can be further debated for main line leading to Expressway only (ie not links).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81824625
Kovoschiz (2020-03-05 19:35:39+00:00): Eg for the very long Airport Rd leading to North Lantau Highway only
Kovoschiz (2020-03-05 19:37:31+00:00): Same outstanding issue that can be discussed as /changeset/81824625
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81825246
eggie (2020-03-05 16:33:04+00:00): Je hebt railway=station veranderd in railway=stop
Wat is een stop?
De voorgaande mutaties waren van jezelf. 
Denk niet dat het klopt zo.
Dit waren je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=81825275
Kijk nog eens een keer of kijk bij een ander station hoe het zit.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 16:36:20+00:00): Hier kun je zien hoe het was toen het nog correct getagd was.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=78281475
eggie (2020-03-05 16:43:19+00:00): Je zou Maarten Deen eens moeten vragen
In Barneveldt heeft medemapper wvdp het inderdaad ook zo getagd. 
Zal Maarten even vragen om te kijken.. 
MVG,
eggie
Maarten Deen (2020-03-06 06:37:35+00:00): Ik vind er niks mis mee. public_transport kan geen station zijn, daar is stop_position de correcte waarde en railway=station zou ik voor het stationsgebouw reserveren, niet voor de plek waar de trein stopt.
Maar dat is wel dubbel met de PTv2 mapping.
eggie (2020-03-06 08:51:17+00:00): Oke Maarten.. bedankt voor het checken. 
MVG,
Eggie
jpennycook (2020-03-05 14:39:29+00:00): Hi.

Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778558452 (the short link between the two roads) - I'm not familiar with the area, but looking at aerial imagery it looks like there's also a similar link road that allows vehicles to turn left from Henley Road to Caversham Park Road as well.
To keep it simple, I'd probably tag it as highway=tertiary or highway=primary_link; oneway=yes; lanes=1; surface=asphalt; lit=yes; maxspeed=30 mph.  I think it's probably safe in this case to leave the name field blank.

Jon
user_11166885 (2020-07-11 19:56:30+00:00): Non credo che un "non cancellare" possa impedire una modifica. Pet tanto ciò essendo una mappa "libera" ognuno può modificarla e sentirsi libero di farlo.
user_10474167 (2020-07-11 21:04:02+00:00): Ma io lo ho chiesto perchè più di così non si puo fare ed impoedire il revbert
user_11166885 (2020-07-11 21:09:18+00:00): Ok, però prima di rilasciare eventuali commenti sei pregato di rileggere attentamente il testo da te scritto.
eggie (2020-03-05 16:24:09+00:00): De tijden weet ik natuurlijk niet als "buitenstaander" , maar de manier van tagging klopt wel zo.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 16:25:51+00:00): ... tenminste als het specifiek over vrachtwagens gaat.
Rudy_VR_IJsselland (2020-03-05 17:06:14+00:00): Het gaat om voertuigen die ter plaatse moeten komen als er alleen een incident is in die straat. Niet om er gewoonlijk doorheen te navigeren omdat het een kortere route is
alphensebezorger (2020-03-05 17:24:23+00:00): De tag motor_vehicle=designated (afkomstig van een eerdere wijziging) lijkt me niet correct. Dat zou betekenen dat deze weg door alle auto's gebruikt mag worden. Welke borden en onderborden staan hier?

De meeste gemeenten staan alleen voor bevoorrading auto's/busjes/vrachtwagens toe in dit soort winkelgebieden tijdens venstertijden. Dan krijg je een tag als:
motor_vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (Mo-Sa 5:00-5:15), maar dan met de juiste tijden. De tag emergency=yes lijkt me prima, als de hulpdiensten inderdaad de aanwezig paaltjes kunnen passeren.
eggie (2020-03-05 18:00:09+00:00): Dat motor_vehicle=designated niet klopt hebben we nu verschillende malen al opgemerkt en proberen te verbeteren.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 18:31:43+00:00): 
De bollard in de Kerkstraat staat ook op motor_vehicle=designated.. Klopt dat wel?  In de Diezerstraat heb ik die tags verwijderd.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Rli
eggie (2020-03-05 18:34:39+00:00): In Deverter zie ik nog een motor_vehicle=designated tag http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Rlj
eggie (2020-03-05 18:58:41+00:00): Ook aangeast.. Je kunt die overpass gebruiken om te kijken waar al emergency=yes is getagd. Via de assistent maak je een query en dan klik je op uitvoeren. Verkeerde tagging kun je ook zo opsporen.
Rudy_VR_IJsselland (2020-03-06 09:03:21+00:00): eggie, bedankt dat je de aanwijzingen geeft. begrijp ik nu dat het straatdeel van de Diezerstraat nu goed staat zoals het moet en jij deze aangepast hebt, en de bollard nog aangepast moet worden waar motor_vehicle=designated  verwijderd moet worden. Alle begin is moeilijk, daarom is jullie commentaar ook erg waardevol
eggie (2020-03-06 09:32:22+00:00): Dat stukje Diezerstraat heb ik motor_vehicle al verwijderd. Maar nog niet alles staat op emergency=yes.
Je kunt het best die overpass gebruiken. maak een query emergency=yes  klik op uitvoeren. Dan kun je zien wat je nog moet doen. 
Denk ook de aanwijzingen van alphensebezorgen even goed bekijken. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 09:35:19+00:00): Zie http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Rms

Even op uitvoeren klikken. 
Dan zie je wat je nog moet doen.
aachso (2020-03-10 04:03:08+00:00): Hi googlenaut,

die building:parts sind alle vom Umriss der Kirche (building=church) getrennt. Teilweise sind sie innerhalb, teilweise außerhalb des Umrisses. Hat das einen speziellen Grund? Die Bäckerei Nobis ist anscheinend auch nur mit einem building:part verbunden, aber nicht mit dem Umriss.
googlenaut (2020-03-10 19:38:47+00:00): fixed!
eggie (2020-03-05 15:42:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 15:45:26+00:00): review.. Lijkt mij prima zo.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 15:48:45+00:00): Om het echt te laten werken zul je de highway=pedestrian ook moeten voorzien van emergency=yes  Dat is hier nog niet gebeurd.
Eggie
*abq* (2020-05-04 18:54:09+00:00): Hi Schoschi,
nein, diesen gerade eingezeichneten Abschnitt der Loipe gibt es nicht. 
VG Reiner
schoschi (2020-05-07 11:25:43+00:00): Hallo @*abq*, welchen Abschnitt von welcher Loipe meinst Du denn? Die meisten Abschnitte bin ich die Tage vor der Bearbeitung selbst gefahren, nur wenige habe ich anhand der offiziellen Website gemappt. 
Grüße aus Freiburg, Georg
*abq* (2020-05-07 16:20:41+00:00): Hi Georg,
der hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778566432
Du hattest da ja bei dem auch angefragt. Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass da keine Spur verläuft, die wäre auch gegenläufig auf der aufsteigenden Stübenwasenspur. Wie du selbst schreibst, der wirkliche Verlauf ist auf der Abfahrt der Stübenwasenloipe weiter westlich. Die Karte auf der Webseite ist falsch.
Habs grad geändert in OSM
VG Reiner
schoschi (2020-12-12 23:15:57+00:00): Hi Reiner / @abq, war jetzt nochmal da und weiß wieder, welcher Abschnitt das war - einer der wenigen, die ich damals nicht selbst abgefahren bin, weil ich da keine Loipe gesehen habe. Danke für Deine Korrektur! Georg
조수미 (2022-07-13 21:52:43+00:00): Hi TZ,

has the admin boundary once followed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778552475 ?
Dinamik (2020-03-06 02:43:43+00:00): Здравствуйте! Предложенная Вами схема тегирования (места расположения непосредственно светофоров обозначаются highway=traffic_signals, а пересечения автомобильных дорог не регулируемом перекрёстке не обозначаются) не является традиционной.

На регулируемых перекрёстках обычно на пересечениях автомобильных линий ставятся highway=traffic_signals, на пешеходные переходы (точки пересечения пешеходных дорог с автомобильными) - highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_signals.

На пешеходных светофорах вне перекрёстков или пешеходных переходах со стоп-линией (которые, фактически, отдельными пешеходными светофорами и являются) используются highway=traffic_signals + crossing=traffic_signals (на пересечениях автомобильных дорог с пешеходными).
RusFox (2020-03-06 09:12:49+00:00): Не то чтобы нетрадиционная, тут скорее неверная в корне. Потому что она перестает быть полезной и для водителей, и для пешеходов.
Вот тут есть хорошие примеры тегирования перекрестков https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
jambamkin (2020-04-04 17:09:39+00:00): Hi Djiminisite, you have added power generation tags to this residential road way/31916940. Was that intentional? I've not seen these tags used this way before.
Djminisite (2020-04-04 19:24:51+00:00): Accidental! Removed them - thank you
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-03-05 21:26:03+00:00): Boa tarde,

justifique sff estes parques que adicionou. Parecem ser jardins e não parques como você classificou.

Aguardo resposta antes de remover.
joaommx (2020-03-06 20:02:31+00:00): Boa tarde Nuno,

Guiando-me pela wiki do OSM um parque é, "an area of open space for recreational use, usually designed and in semi-natural state with grassy areas, trees and bushes."

Portanto exactamente o que aqui existe, um espaço verde planeado mas num estado semi-natural com relvados, árvores e arbustos.

Um jardim segundo a mesma wiki é, "a distinguishable planned space, usually outdoors, set aside for the display, cultivation, and enjoyment of plants and other forms of nature."

Algo um pouco mais vago que a definição de parque - acreditando que possa existir até alguma sobreposição - mas claramente dedicado à mostra, cultivo e apreciação das espécies vegetais, que não será tanto aqui o objectivo primordial destes epaços.

Um bom exemplo de um jardim (versus parque) parece-me o jardim mais formal que existe a nordeste deste bairro nas instalações dos Missionários da Consolata de Lisboa.

Cumprimentos
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-03-06 20:04:52+00:00): Essa lógica não faz sentido algum. Quem gere o parque e qual o nome do parque?
joaommx (2020-03-06 20:49:54+00:00): O que não faz sentido, Nuno?

O parque, sendo um espaço verde não estruturante localizado nos Olivais é gerido pela Junta de Freguesia dos Olivais. Não tem nome que se conheça.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-03-06 20:56:08+00:00): Forneça um link da junta onde isso está sff.
joaommx (2020-03-06 22:11:14+00:00): "A Freguesia dos Olivais tem uma área de espaços verdes de 101 ha dos quais 65 ha são da sua responsabilidade a manutenção.

Os restantes 36 ha correspondem aos espaços Verdes estruturantes cuja responsabilidade de manutenção é da CML:

[Lista de espaços verdes estruturantes nos Olivais]"

https://www.jf-olivais.pt/espacos-verdes/
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-03-06 22:16:03+00:00): Aí tá, é um espaço verde, que dê acordo com a wiki é um jardim e não um parque. Os parques têm outras infraestruturas
joaommx (2020-03-06 23:26:26+00:00): Nuno, vamos lá ver, tanto um jardim como um parque são espaços verdes, esse seu argumento não serve para distinguir os dois conceitos. Jardim e parque para si podem significar coisas diferentes do que o que foi a minha interpretação, mas eu estou-me a guiar pelas definições do OSM. E guiando-me por essas definições este espaço corresponde ao "park" e não ao "garden".

Aguardo esclarecimentos sobre as razões porque considera que este tipo de espaço deve ficar registado como garden e não como park.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-03-06 23:30:59+00:00): Recomendo que volte a ler o que está na wiki. Cirurgicamente você selecionou o que lhe interessava. Leia o resto do artigo e rapidamente perceberá que espaços verdes em redor de apartamentos não são de todo parques, nem no OpenStreetMap, nem em Portugal.
joaommx (2020-03-06 23:48:59+00:00): Tendo lido o artigo completo de park com mais atenção percebo agora que conceito é usado para espaços com um uso diferente do que supunha e regra geral a uma escala diferente, inclusivamente podendo os jardins estar inseridos dentro de parques.

No entanto agredecia que da próxima vez fosse mais construtivo. Entendo que para alguém que edita tanto o OSM questões destas possam ser aborrecidas de gerir, mas durante praticamente toda a conversa nunca se dignou a explicar a sua posição e pôs inclusivamente em causa a minha boa vontade dizendo que escolhi seleccionar o que me interessava daqueles artigos quando me limitei a copiar as definições encontradas como introduções de ambos os artigos. Fica o conselho para futuras interações com editores mais inexperientes.
luisforte (2020-03-07 00:02:22+00:00): Viva, na minha opinião estas áreas não são parques nem jardins. Nem as estruturas autárquicas as consideram como tal. Servem basicamente de embelezar a estrutura urbana. Diria que são áreas verdes urbanas, normalmente classificadas como landuse=village_green
b0ssi (2020-03-05 14:49:58+00:00): There are two picnic area markers here, but both are denoting the same picnic area - should they be combined into one (rather than having two redundant markers with the same name)?
aharvey (2020-03-10 07:15:17+00:00): Generally if they are the same picnic grounds you'd just have one OSM element, ideally an area covering both. If they are distinct enough to be considered different you could have two, but in this case I'm not sure. If you've been there on the ground and you reckon it's just one you can delete one and extend the area to cover both.
b0ssi (2020-03-11 05:41:43+00:00): Great, thanks for the clarification. I haven't been exactly in that corner recently, but if I come around next time, I'll take a look and update the entries here.
eggie (2020-03-05 15:50:52+00:00): Beste Stijn alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster en als zodanig precies ingemeten. Het is beter dus gebouwen niet te veranderen van vorm.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 15:57:41+00:00): Kijk nooit naar de dakranden.. Luchtfoto's zijn schuin genomen. Deze changeset wordt teruggedraaid.
eggie (2020-03-05 16:08:53+00:00): reverted door  Wijzigingenset #81830284
eggie (2020-03-05 15:52:34+00:00): leisure=garden met  name=prive terrein hoort niet in OSM thuis.
Stond er nog niet op wordt niet door andere lokale mappers begrepen.
eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 16:08:30+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #81830277
user_7130456 (2020-04-04 15:19:15+00:00): 你这纯xjb改，三圣花乡什么时候是城镇了，明明4A级景区