piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mweper (2015-01-01 17:53:47+00:00): Aquí un ejemplo: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3581543

En la relación tiene que haber 3 miembros (from, device, to).
Los miembros from y to tienen que estar sobre la carretera y el device en donde se encuentra el radar (generalmente a un costado).
Si el radar tiene efecto en ambas direcciones, se crean 2 relaciones.
Si necesitas ayuda contactame por MP.
emacsen (2014-12-31 20:37:23+00:00): This is a great changeset. In the future, could you add a source and a comment to changesets?
eugenebata (2014-12-31 20:55:42+00:00): Yes, FIT's campus map was used.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-01 22:14:08+00:00): A couple of nodes in here need a "main tag".  What are https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3262388733 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3262386995 best described as?  Some sort of shop or office, or something elese?
AlanLevy (2014-12-31 20:47:19+00:00): Ignore the commit comment, that relates to a different edit. This building is two halves with a single common entrance. One half is Colleges nursery and the other half is the community centre.
mavl (2015-01-02 10:54:11+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Большая просьба при добавлении адреса указывать полный адрес (номер дома + название улицы/название микрорайона), а не только номер дома.
Неполный адрес бесполезен для адресного поиска.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-04 09:16:07+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1191523849 really a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319789929 since they're in the same building? Where does http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1191523856 fit in?
CrimsonCaribou (2015-01-06 09:29:13+00:00): You make a good point, I had not noticed the two point nodes. Correction made.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-06 09:51:25+00:00): Thanks - I've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/297043 since a resuarant and a convenience store within a supermarket seems unlikely.  I'll probably get the chance to walk past here a couple of times in the next couple of months; other people may get the chance sooner.
CrimsonCaribou (2015-01-06 09:59:00+00:00): I added the supermarket tag - but i've swapped it back to retail building to allow for the resteraunt.
emacsen (2015-01-01 01:52:23+00:00): Can you explain what this changeset is? You're changing a ton of objects.
eugenebata (2015-01-01 01:57:26+00:00): Added some MTA Bus stops in the Upper West Side; added Lincoln Center driveway by the front facade; straightened some roads that should not have been as bent in some areas.
emacsen (2015-01-01 13:30:13+00:00): That's awesome. Could you add that stuff to the changeset comment (when you hit Save). Right now it just says "Fixed rendering error" on your changesets.
johnny_1982 (2015-01-01 00:27:29+00:00): Parts of the S101 are closed. New road built. (Been there in summer 2014.)
Warin61 (2023-03-08 01:57:58+00:00): Hi,
Way: 319796961 tagged natural=water, I have added intermittent=yes. However I question if the tag natural=water is all that 'good'? The DCS Base Map shows 'Land subject to inundation' and I think that here is a flood plain ?? Yes, I know OSM does not have a tag for that yet.. but there is a proposal... Thoughts?
cleary (2023-03-08 05:38:26+00:00): Hello Warin
Looking back, I think the Bing imagery that I used must have shown the area completely covered in water with no sign that it was intermittent. Now however it is clear from various imagery sources that the area is not always covered with water, so I agree with adding the intermittent tag.

The accuracy of mapping water areas in the DCS Base Map seems variable in different areas and I think satellite imagery can also be helpful. Accurate tagging really requires knowledge of how much water lies in the area and for how long. To me it is a matter of judgement and additional information can inform further judgement. Please feel free to modify the tags if you think it appropriate,

In regard to "floodplain", I think that is unlikely here. I am an amateur and still learning, but floodplains seem to me to be areas where the water is flowing and eventually drains from the surface, albeit leaving the sub-soil quite soaked. I think the area that we are looking at here is sort of basin that fills with water - an endpoint where water fills until it soaks in or evaporates - like the nearby Lake Altiboulka. The difference seems to be that Aktiboulka gets more water and is filled or partially-filled most of the time.
cleary (2023-03-08 05:45:44+00:00): Sorry that was submitted before I finished editing it. The other thing I wanted to add is that I am not familiar with the "landform" tag.

As I said, I am still learning. I have studied a lot of satellite imagery, I have visited many of areas I have mapped (where they are accessible to the public) and I have consulted the NSW DCS Base Map. Much of my mapping relies on judgements and I am comfortable where a more knowledgeable person is able to improve my contributions.

Regards
Warin61 (2023-03-08 09:56:30+00:00): I'm using 'landform' tag like landcover and landuse. So for things like cliffs peaks .. The 'natural' tag is used for both land forms and land covers .. and is use for both natural things and man effected things.. so to me the tag 'natural' does not make much sense. 

Floodplains vs lakes.. like you said .. water remains in lakes .. so I think they are deeper than a floodplain. Lot of 'estimations' going on - we do the best we can. The landform tag has few uess so I am fairly confident that what it says is what it is rather than being a tag for the render. I have used it for dry swamps. The numbers tell me that most (90%?) 'natural=mud' in Australasia is dry swamp ...

I am trying to map the 'new' National Park area to the north - done tracks and water features - named creeks, reservoirs and bores and a few missing lakes (at least to the DCS Base Map).
Warin61 (2023-03-08 10:05:57+00:00): Oh .. just found this

https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/directory.pdf
cleary (2023-03-09 05:15:16+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I'll look further at the landform tag - I do recall that reservoirs used to be tagged as landuse but the majority view was to change to natural=water+water=reservoir. While water is a naturally occurring substance, it did seem to me that reservoirs were more appropriately regarded as landuse. However whatever classifications we have, there will always be grey areas or overlap.

Thanks also for the link to the directory of wetland areas- I have browsed but will go back and read more thoroughly.

Thanks again. I appreciate your good mapping in rural areas.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-12-28 19:33:30+00:00): It looks like during this changeset, several points along Welch Creek road were dragged, resulting in errors on Viste Grande Road and others.  See http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=27834216  

Could you check into this?
ricomundy (2015-12-30 18:06:44+00:00): Thanks for noticing. Yes, using the Strava heat map to smooth roads sometimes does, this. I have fixed those other road connections now.
GerdP (2015-10-30 10:42:46+00:00): please review: 
the tag highway=closed is rarely used.
Bing shows a normal narrow road.
I guess highway=path, bicycle=yes,foot=yes
matches here? 
Please check also way 230965713:
Bing seems to show a barrier=fence around the turning_circle, so bicycle=yes seems to be wrong. Or is Bing out-dated?
GerdP (2015-11-05 10:37:35+00:00): please review my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35098770
sommerluk (2015-01-08 10:49:48+00:00): Thanks!
Stteffanos (2015-01-01 10:14:16+00:00): This road appears with no name on OpenStreetMap
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 15:30:19+00:00): hello! In unlikely case that you remember this place or can visit it again...

What kind of products are sold at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3263050295/history ?

Would it be well described by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dconfectionery ?
Fischkopp0815 (2017-09-29 05:21:02+00:00): Ich finde das content=manure  am landuse=farmyard eher überflüssig. 

https://dict.leo.org/englisch-deutsch/manure
 
Ein Bauernhof enthält Mist, schon klar

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319833506
GerdP (2015-10-12 16:30:37+00:00): please review:
way 319845369 has invalid
tag highway=footway;path
and also other tags have combined
values. Is this tunnel really part of a cycle
way?
GerdP (2015-11-14 16:28:11+00:00): Please review my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35309955
Nakaner (2015-02-01 21:18:45+00:00): Findest du nicht auch, dass cycleway=shared und cycleway:right=lane etwas widersprüchlich ist? :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186854315/history
mh9000 (2015-01-01 13:37:38+00:00): Straßenbau abgeschlossen
wotzit07 (2015-01-01 14:25:26+00:00): Unnamed road
robert (2015-01-01 14:38:03+00:00): You haven't tagged this way as a road, so it doesn't represent anything specific. You've got to select the way and use the buttons on the left (underneath "search...") to assign "tags" to the way.
wotzit07 (2015-01-01 14:23:17+00:00): Wrong name
JohnDoe23 (2015-01-03 02:14:11+00:00): Ist diese Straße auch für Fußgänger und Radfahrer gesperrt? Laut den momentanen Straßenattributen dürfen nur Anlieger diese Straße betreten und befahren. Meines Wissens nach gibt es diese Beschilderung in Deutschland aber gar nicht. Gruß

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access#Werte
*Martin* (2016-08-23 14:30:39+00:00): Hello Gobftald

As you have used forbidden source (Google) your changes will be reverted.
Supaplex (2015-01-01 15:52:50+00:00): pubic_transport=stop_area好像是用在relation上面，把一地數個站牌包起來
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public%20transport=stop%20area?uselang=zh-TW
streckenkundler (2019-04-19 13:18:45+00:00): Hei,

die WMS-Dienste Brandenburgs (z.B. von http://isk.geobasis-bb.de) dürfen in OSM nicht verwendet werden. Bei Verwenden dieser Dienste liegt ein Lizenzverstoß vor. Solche Daten müssen aus den OSM-Beständen vollständig entfernt werden. 

Meldung an DWG erfolgt.

streckenkundler
oderplantscher (2019-04-21 17:45:46+00:00): Die fraglichen Hausumrisse wurden durch Bing-Sat-Umrisse durch abzeichnen ersetzt.
streckenkundler (2019-04-22 09:31:06+00:00): Danke. Damit sollte das nun sauber sein...

Grüße,

Sven
Megachip (2017-09-18 23:01:20+00:00): Why this is tagged with admin_level 7 but "includes" relations with admin_level 4 and 6? Also it is a bit confusing why only parts of Noord-Holland and Flevoland belongs to AMA/MRA, cause most of the sources tells the whole provinces belongs to the AMA/MRA (e.g. https://www.amsterdameconomicboard.com/en/amsterdam-metropolitan-area or https://www.metropoolregioamsterdam.nl/pagina/20161229-over-mra)

Are metropolregions administrative units?
sebastic (2017-09-18 23:10:57+00:00): Because the metropoolregio is made up of municipalities (admin_level=8) and provinces (admin_level=4), it replaces the "plusregio" (admin_level=6).

For details of admin_levels in The Netherlands see:

 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=administrative#11_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries

The metriopoolregio is a kind of administrative unit, but in the same way as provinces, municipalities, and cities (woonplaatsen).

Further discussion of metropoolregios should be down on the Dutch forum:

 http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Megachip (2017-09-20 17:08:57+00:00): Thanks for fast reply. Sadly I do not understand dutch very well. Started a german discussion about it: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59788 
Im thinking about thinks like boundary=economic(al) cause the response of nominatim confuses, how can higher regions belonging to one lower region (and this sometimes only half).
sebastic (2017-09-20 17:53:20+00:00): English is fine on the Dutch forum as well, pretty much all Dutch people speak it unlike German.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 16:28:56+00:00): There seem to be two "Ilkeston & Heanor Delivery Office" now - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319875408/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268091207/history .  Does that make sense?
Walter Schlögl (2015-01-22 17:30:13+00:00): One is the building, the other one is the area around the building. If someone else can find a better solution, please feel free.
M!dgardAutomated (2015-01-05 13:22:26+00:00): Accidentally done with my M!dgardAutomated account instead of M!dgard
Jose Riha (2015-02-13 20:55:46+00:00): co je to kapor3?
trigpoint (2015-01-01 19:40:03+00:00): Bing imagery suggests there are sveral roads missing in this area, would it be possible to add them please.
trigpoint (2015-01-01 19:39:16+00:00): Is this a real shop/office with signs making it clearly identifiable to passer by?
Work from home businesses have no place in openstreetmap unless they are verifiable, osm is not a business directory/
Ahmed64 (2015-01-01 20:30:27+00:00): hi, the business has a shopfront and can be verified with the likes of google street view / google plus account.  https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/ProtectPC.co.uk/@53.743802,-2.468587,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x487b9fb9d7582113:0xa95d0dbb8dc007fd
trigpoint (2015-01-02 11:14:56+00:00): In that case you should add shop=computer to the node.
It would be really good if you could use your local knowledge to add other detail to the map, missing roads are the obvious one, but other shops, schools ould be really good. The area looks very blank at the moment.
Thanks
Ahmed64 (2015-01-02 11:48:35+00:00): Thanks will do.
I'm not sure if you could point me in the right direction, I'm new to openstreetmap, any chance you could summarise how I could amend changes, the tools are something I'm unfamiliar with.
rab (2015-01-02 10:44:32+00:00): Mit Potlatch turn lanes bearbeiten geht meistens daneben
rab (2015-01-02 10:56:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21283447
Kannst du mir mal erklären wie man hier in Zukunft linkks abbiegen soll?
Das Changeset werde ich heute Abend reverten!
user_72483 (2015-01-02 15:50:30+00:00): Danke für den Revert!
Warin61 (2018-10-11 01:15:19+00:00): Hi,
The tag landuse=scrub I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
udaykiran3 (2019-07-23 08:31:25+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the

"way 287594070
way 287593907
way 287594154
way 287593882
way 287593866"

classified as 'unclassified' and residential. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
WanMil (2015-01-02 13:42:31+00:00): Hi, Du hast die Anschlußstelle Cloppenburg-West gelöscht (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251044703/history#map=17/52.84368/8.02604). War das aus Versehen oder gibt es die Auffahrt nicht mehr?
cadsauxk (2015-01-05 22:43:25+00:00): Any particular reason why these two nodes were deleted?
dbusse (2015-01-07 06:27:57+00:00): Both points where on exact same location causing keep right to generate an error (very sharp angle i think). Also both points did not enhance geometry of the underlying way. Cant find any harm done with this changeset.  Hope its OK. If there is something i overlooked i can revert it if you want.
cadsauxk (2015-01-07 15:49:54+00:00): Thanks for clarifying, just wanted to understand what had been done and why.
kayle (2015-01-28 08:05:43+00:00): Ahoj, poprosim ta ak nie je cislo pridelene nedavaj addr:street. Mas tu na par domoch zadane addr:street=* (miesto nazvu hviezdicka)
Dakujem
Tantum (2015-02-20 09:39:38+00:00): Nazdar, mohol by si mi povedat ako mam mapovat adresy ked ulica nema nazov? zda sa, ze ked dam len cislo domu a obec v ktorom je tak sa mi na mape zobrazi cislo ale vyhladat ho neviem.

Napr. Kosuty 51

Diky moc
kayle (2015-02-20 09:42:22+00:00): pridaj ešte addr:place=Košúty viď napr. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/48.7638/18.5725
Tantum (2015-02-20 10:17:07+00:00): diky moc, funguje to. Viem to nejak hromadne aplikovat na viac budov? alebo ich musim update-ovat po jednom?
kayle (2015-02-20 10:25:31+00:00): Pozeram ze to upravujes cez iD, tam to asi nie je mozne, JOSM (http://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ma moznost vyberu podla filtra. Stiahnes oblast obce, stlacis ctrl+F a zadas "addr\:city=Košúty" (bez uvodzoviek) a oznaci vsetko s takym addr:city. Uz len naraz pridas vsetkym bodom/cestam addr:place a upload
Tantum (2015-02-20 10:38:26+00:00): Diky moc, hodne si mi pomohol ;)
kayle (2015-02-20 10:47:40+00:00): Ak by si mal nejake dalsie otazky, mozes sa pytat aj na sk skupine http://groups.google.com/group/osm_sk/
Tantum (2015-02-22 18:38:49+00:00): nazdar kayle - sorry, ze sa pytam tu ale na sk skupine trva nejaky cas kym mi odobria konto a nieco sa stalo co by som potreboval riesit urgentne.

Update-ol som vsetko ako si mi poradil a do vcerajska bolo vsetko Ok no dnes viem vyhladat len mizivu cast adries a neviem preco. 

Napr.: kosuty 50 mi vyhalda ale kosuty 51 uz nie..aj ked tagy su uplne rovnake

co by si poradil pls?
Vincent de Phily (2015-05-13 14:24:37+00:00): Is the place=region node (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3264138716) supposed to be a locality, or is it just a mishap that should be deleted ?
Dafo43 (2015-05-13 17:09:16+00:00): It was a typo. I deleted the node now given that the old road will be completely replaced by the motorway.
tms13 (2015-01-13 12:44:34+00:00): This outline appears very badly aligned, compared to OS OpenData and confirmed by my personal traces.  Please can you revert this change?  Thanks.
Andy_W (2015-01-13 13:11:14+00:00): The reason why I made the change was that the original was badly aligned with bing aerial imagery.  Are you telling me that you have independant GPS location information that suggets that OS OpenData is the best source?
tms13 (2015-01-20 08:47:50+00:00): Yes, my visits there (including a transit of the natural arch) corresponds much better with the OpenData outlines than with Bing aerial.  I can probably dig out my track logs if you need to see them.
tms13 (2015-01-20 08:50:44+00:00): I've noticed poor alignment of aerial photography in other places - most notably on steep slopes such as this zig-zag ascent west of Torridon: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/57.55422/-5.54483
Andy_W (2015-01-20 11:52:27+00:00): If the OS OpenData is more accurate then I have no problem with reverting my changes.  The bing imagery is quite poor in places.
I have no experience of reverting changes, do you want to do this or should I give it a try?
tms13 (2015-01-20 14:21:23+00:00): It's not something I've ever done.  It would look better done by you (to make clear it's not a hostile action!).  If I were doing it, I'd start with the Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback - is that any help?
Andy_W (2015-01-20 14:51:51+00:00): No problem, I asked just in case you had done it before.
Might need to grab JOSM, but anything perl'ish is usually my favourite.
Leave it with me.
Andy_W (2015-01-27 21:31:59+00:00): All my changes should now have been reverted.
mavl (2015-01-02 12:34:37+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Ваши изменения границы заказника «Ново-Таповский» отменены. Также граница этого заказника была немного уточнена.
Граница была нанесена на основании постановления правительства Тюменской области от 11 ноября 2009 г. № 316-п.

Ваши изменения не увеличили точность этой границы, а уменьшили её.
dkiselev (2015-01-02 12:59:42+00:00): Специально я границу вроде и не правил, извините если где-то зацепил.
mavl (2015-01-02 13:50:55+00:00): Ничего страшного. Были удалены несколько точек из-за чего граница спрямилась.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-01 23:12:25+00:00): Hi, 
In this changeset you have removed "deciduous" and added "broadleaved" to objects such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154600188/history .  This assumes incorrectly that deciduous trees are necesarily broad-leaved, which is not the case.  See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larch which says "Although a conifer, the larch is a deciduous tree and loses its leaves in the autumn".

Also, it looks very much like a mechanical edit - where was it discussed beforehand?  Some of the objects changed don't seem to have been changed beforehand, and perhaps an OSM note would have been a better way to proceed.  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204041143 for example has a waterway=stream tag, which is presumably in error - a non-mechanical edit would have picked this up and added the stream tag(s) correctly.
Med (2015-01-01 23:19:58+00:00): Hi,

I just followed the instructions after the deprecation of "wood". More precisely I am doing edits following this table: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/leaftype#Features.2FPages_affected . That being said, I initially thought the same as you.

Otherwise, I only touched the wood tag, nothing else, so it is not surprising that stream remains.

Cheers,

Med
SomeoneElse (2015-01-01 23:24:27+00:00): You haven't done what is suggested on that page.  That suggests that on new objects  "type=deciduous should be migrated to leaf_cycle=deciduous".  You've done something entirely different - added a "leaf_type" key based upon information about the leaf cycle.
Med (2015-01-01 23:29:40+00:00): I did not understand that page that way. To me "old tag" just refers to the deprecated tags and the "new tag" what should be used instead. It makes a direct link between wood=deciduous and leaf_type=broadleaved. There is no indication of a link between wood=deciduous and leaf_cycle=deciduous. I guess because that information actually should have been tagged as type=deciduous. I think that section should at least be clarified.
Med (2015-01-01 23:36:36+00:00): Note that if you want to revert all those changes, feel free. I have seen other changes similar to mines though, so I think this point really needs to be clarified.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-02 22:39:08+00:00): OK; I'll revert on that basis.

As to how to go forward, any mechanical edit will need to be discussed as per http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy .  Where there's no change to the meaning, I'd be surprised if there was opposition (e.g. X=deciduous to leaf_cycle=deciduous).  Where someone has mapped wood=deciduous it may often have been a synonym for "broad_leaved", but you can't assume that.  In some cases you may be able to ask the original mapper or importer - there probably aren't 441 pages of ways that need to be dealt with individually.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-03 21:10:16+00:00): FYI I've looked at a few of these locally to me and updated the ones that definitely are deciduous and broadeaved.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-07 09:16:32+00:00): For info, at the weekend I went and had a look at this area:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/6SY

and it turns out that things are _much_ more complicated than how I had previously mapped it. There are at least four groups of "planting type" there (old-growth broadleaved deciduous on the SSSI, planted-for-forestry pine in neat rows, some "odds and sods" mixed deciduous between the pine plantings, and some areas that are virtually heathland).  I'll have a go at updating over the next week or so, but it's complicated.
d1g (2015-03-17 04:02:33+00:00): В принципе, если адресация явно ошибочная была на Танкистов, то со спорных домов её есть смысл снять. Попытался продолжить исправления здесь: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29532347
Víctor L (2017-01-26 05:36:33+00:00): El límite entre Córdoba y San Luis (a la altura de la RN188) entre Casimiro Gómez y Chamaico, ¿no está ubicado 1 km. al oeste? 
Mi duda surge porque el arco de entrada entrada a la provincia de San Luis (por RN188) esta a esa altura y existe un cartel que dice Provincia de San Luis para el que va hacia el oeste (ver: https://goo.gl/maps/RvzK1bcE76n y https://goo.gl/maps/D99dUnP7DY32). Lo mismo observo con este mísmo límite (aunque limitando con Córdoba) en la RN7 y RN8 (aparece idéntico al dato de Google Maps).
mweper (2015-01-02 01:23:05+00:00): Perfecto!. Yo añadiría mayor distancia del miembro from al device, para que tengan tiempo de frenar.