piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OptikalCrow (2022-05-17 02:58:42+00:00): Hello dufekin,

Could you explain why you are tagging these areas as leisure=park? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14067094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14067093
SomeoneElse (2022-06-19 12:15:38+00:00): Hello dufekin,
Following on from Marc's message above, please do reply to the questions above, and to a number of others at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=30521 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of the Data Working Group
dufekin (2023-08-29 00:20:49+00:00): Those are public lands (government-owned areas) that don't seem to fit in any other category.  It's not easy to find them now that they've been deleted, but a more appropriate tag for the first might be boundary=water_protection_area if that's official, and the map shows it nowadays.  The second area is airport authority property, but the university, not the airport authority, owns the airport, and most of the area lies across the street from the airport, so I wasn't sure how to classify it.
OptikalCrow (2023-08-29 00:40:55+00:00): Protected public lands can be tagged as boundary=protected_area with the appropriate protect_class=*. 

leisure=park implies there are leisure activities to be found there, that the public can visit freely. Applying it to other parcels just to force it to show up on the renderer is bad practice (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer) 

Regarding the airport property, I don't know what the best practice would be here. I would lean on either not mapping it or combining it with the surrounding landuses. Again, not everything needs to be rendered on the base map so putting a tag that doesn't accurately describe what's there just so that bit of land fills in a certain color is not good practice.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
windkraft-os (2022-04-22 20:49:26+00:00): Bitte gib einen Beleg, dass hier eine Eno 152 errichtet wurde
berndw (2022-04-24 10:13:46+00:00): Hallo

Könntest Du bitte die Quelle für die Namensänderung nennen?

Ich glaube kaum, dass das Luftbild diesen zeigt.

Da dieser Park früher mal ein Friedhof war, würde ich den Namen des Friedhofs eher als name_alt in Verbindung mit historic=graveyard als korrekt ansehen.

Wie siehst Du das?
Norman Spirit (2022-04-24 23:04:22+00:00): https://www.vg-linz.de/tourismus/sehenswuerdigkeiten/stadt-linz-am-rhein/martinskirche.html

Agreed & done.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
gscholz (2022-04-24 07:12:13+00:00): Hi LLAQWA,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-78.51167&lat=-1.12214&zoom=18

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120070034

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-04-27 04:29:12+00:00): Hi LLAQWA, 
this error still exists, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-05-03 04:27:40+00:00): Hi LLAQWA, 
due to missing response I have reverted this changeset. The error is fixed now.
Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ivanatora (2022-04-23 06:25:43+00:00): Тази промяна вдига доста червени флагове:
- окръжността с landuse=industrial - съществува ли физически такава окръжност (ограда?), или е сложена просто да изглежда красиво на картата?
- името (name=...)на landuse=industrial трябва всъщност да е description таг
- сградата вероятно не е amenity=studio, а man_made=tower + уточняващи тагове

За тагването на ретранслаторни станции, антени и друго радио-разпръсквателно оборудване може да видиш https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Telecoms#Communications_Tower
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ivanatora (2022-04-23 06:25:10+00:00): Тази промяна вдига доста червени флагове:
- окръжността с landuse=industrial - съществува ли физически такава окръжност (ограда?), или е сложена просто да изглежда красиво на картата?
- името (name=...)на landuse=industrial трябва всъщност да е description таг
- сградата вероятно не е amenity=studio, а man_made=tower + уточняващи тагове

За тагването на ретранслаторни станции, антени и друго радио-разпръсквателно оборудване може да видиш https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Telecoms#Communications_Tower
ivanatora (2022-04-23 06:24:43+00:00): Тази промяна вдига доста червени флагове:
- окръжността с landuse=industrial - съществува ли физически такава окръжност (ограда?), или е сложена просто да изглежда красиво на картата?
- името (name=...)на landuse=industrial трябва всъщност да е description таг
- сградата вероятно не е amenity=studio, а man_made=tower + уточняващи тагове

За тагването на ретранслаторни станции, антени и друго радио-разпръсквателно оборудване може да видиш https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Telecoms#Communications_Tower
ivanatora (2022-04-23 06:24:14+00:00): Тази промяна вдига доста червени флагове:
- окръжността с landuse=industrial - съществува ли физически такава окръжност (ограда?), или е сложена просто да изглежда красиво на картата?
- името (name=...)на landuse=industrial трябва всъщност да е description таг
- сградата вероятно не е amenity=studio, а man_made=tower + уточняващи тагове

За тагването на ретранслаторни станции, антени и друго радио-разпръсквателно оборудване може да видиш https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Telecoms#Communications_Tower
ivanatora (2022-04-23 06:23:24+00:00): Тази промяна вдига доста червени флагове:
- окръжността с landuse=industrial - съществува ли физически такава окръжност (ограда?), или е сложена просто да изглежда красиво на картата?
- името (name=...)на landuse=industrial трябва всъщност да е description таг
- сградата вероятно не е amenity=studio, а man_made=tower + уточняващи тагове

За тагването на ретранслаторни станции, антени и друго радио-разпръсквателно оборудване може да видиш https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Telecoms#Communications_Tower
user_5359 (2022-04-24 15:06:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on your tree import. Your notation with
taxon:genus = Acer
taxon:species = Acer platanoides
taxon:species:en = Norway maple
isn't the standard notation. Please use the version without the prefix taxon:, see
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:taxon,
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:species,
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:genus
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-04-25 23:57:53+00:00): Is this not valid? The wiki page for Key:taxon suggests similar tagging. I can change it though since I see that genus and species are more common
4004 (2022-04-24 00:00:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29125625 https://ggptk.by/ "
Адрес
230026, г. Гродно, ул. Славинского, 7
"
Austrianton (2022-04-25 01:20:04+00:00): Something went very wrong here. A mass deletion over this large of an area is highly indicative for either something going wrong with the editor or vandalism.

What happened here?
friedrice428 (2022-04-25 05:00:16+00:00): I was checking something in Europe, then forgot to delete some nodes I made that weren't meant to be uploaded and mapped in Indonesia
Austrianton (2022-04-25 21:03:16+00:00): Ok that explains it.

Please make sure to avoid change-sets that cover such a large area in the future, as that both sets off quite a few alarm bells and spams local editing history feeds, thereby making it harder to find edits in areas.

Happy future mapping
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-22 22:31:24+00:00): This was never Peter Robinson Court, i drove down here to see that the street sign read Water Leaf Crt
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
watmildon (2026-01-19 22:53:42+00:00): I am updating population tags and I stumbled into this edit setting the population to 1. Which is very amusing.
stlmapper74 (2026-01-20 00:41:43+00:00): I must have added the tag and forgot to fill it out lol!
user_6471069 (2022-04-22 22:39:26+00:00): Coś poszło nie tak, wycofałem te zmiany.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
syncronic (2022-04-25 18:20:45+00:00): Der Kreisverkehr ist schon seit 10 Jahren im Bau
ChrisFromRV (2022-04-25 18:49:56+00:00): Auf bing maps sieht es noch nicht danach aus...
PT-53 (2022-04-26 08:19:28+00:00): Hallo Chris,
dort finden in der Umgebung definitiv Straßenbaumaßnahmen statt. Auch wenn am Kreisel selbst derzeit - vielleicht -  noch nicht genaut wird  (wie alt sind die Bavaria-Luftbilder ???) , würde ich das als eine zusammenhängende Baumaßnahme sehen und den Kreisel auf construction setzen.
Bitte nimm Deine Änderung wieder 
zurück!
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-04-26 13:44:03+00:00): Hallo Chris,
Diesen Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120071667
hast Du übersehen. Bitte Änderungen ebenfalls zurücksetzen.
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-04-26 13:46:01+00:00): PS:
Diesen Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054093989/history
 ebenfalls noch überarbeiten.
Danke
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
csomerville (2023-03-17 04:21:58+00:00): The changes from residential ➜ tertiary do not seem to match classification criteria. I'd like to suggest reverting highway classification changes made in this changeset. Let me know what you think. Happy to discuss in more detail.
Trevor_1 (2023-03-18 16:20:02+00:00): How do they not match the criteria?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-22 23:25:41+00:00): Hola Javvvier Mendozzza, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se ha agregado la etiqueta con clave "Zonificación", la cual no es una etiqueta que usamos en OSM, por lo que las he retirado. Puede encontrar una lista de etiquetas que utilizamos en la wiki de OSM [0]. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla en el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad peruana.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Map_Features
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-22 23:29:55+00:00): Hola Silviopalomino, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado la etiqueta con clave "Paraje", la cual no es una etiqueta que usamos en OSM, por lo que la he retirado. Puede encontrar una lista de etiquetas que utilizamos en la wiki de OSM [0]. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla en el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad peruana.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Map_Features
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
ovruni (2022-04-22 23:32:31+00:00): Hola Javvvier Mendozzza, en este conjunto de cambios también se ha agregado la clave Zonificación, la cual no es una etiqueta que utilicemos en OSM, por lo que la he retirado.
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
DeFra85 (2022-06-22 17:20:21+00:00): Hey, bei der Route "Schnapsidee und Herrengedeck" fehlt die Verbindung vom Startpunk am Steinhagen ZOB zur Mühlenstraße.
Fehlte die bei dir auch schon?
segubi (2022-07-04 08:49:30+00:00): Entschuldige die späte Reaktion. Ich mache alles nur nach den Beobachtungen vor Ort und weiß daher nicht, wo der offizielle Startpunkt ist. Es gibt aber keine Ausschilderung vom ZOB aus. Nach der Broschüre https://www.erfolgskreis-gt.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Land/Radfahren/Ziehen_Sie_doch_mal_wieder_Kreise_/Schnapsidee_und_Herrengedeck/Schnapsidee_und_Herrengedeck.pdf ist der Startpunkt der Parkplatz an der Brinkstraße. Am nächstgelegenen Wegweiser (https://openstreetmap.org/node/9689698680) finden sich KEINE Routeneinschübe für die Route. Insofern spiegelt im Moment die Relation die tatsächliche Situation glaube ich, ganz gut wieder.
DeFra85 (2022-07-06 17:14:57+00:00): Hey, dass der Wegweiser am ZOB mittlerweile die Straßenseite gewechselt hat habe ich auch erst vor kurzem bemerkt. 
Ich hatte dem Verantwortlichen im Steinhagener Rathaus damals geschrieben und der meinte Startpunkt sei jetzt der ZOB bzw. die neue “Mobilitätsstation“ und der Marker war auch dort.
Aber beim Umstellen des Wegweiser haben sie wohl den Marker entfernt. Am Wegweiser an der Mühlenstraße, Ecke Stettiner fehlt dieser Richtung ZOB jedoch AUCH! Ob es jetzt wohl ein Rundweg ist?
Ich werde mal wieder im Rathaus nachfragen was derzeit Phase ist und ggf. darauf hinweisen, dass deren verschiedenen Internetseiten dann auch entsprechend aktualisiert werden sollten.
DeFra85 (2022-07-06 17:18:38+00:00): Ach, kann es sein, dass es an der Bushaltestelle “Gasthof zur Horst“ eine kleine Lücke in der Relationen gibt?
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-26 19:46:32+00:00): Do not change valid roadways to cartpaths.  This is not correct and has been reverted in part or full.
4004 (2022-04-23 22:31:18+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
а название вы хотели убрать?
drivec (2022-05-10 22:13:52+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
ovruni (2022-04-23 00:45:59+00:00): Hola Javvvier Mendozzza, este conjunto de cambios al igual que los anteriores se han agregado etiquetas que no son las que utilizamos en OSM, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-24 07:47:09+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado por diferentes zonas de Lima ediciones similares a la suya, lo que sugiere que existe en curso un conjunto de ediciones organizadas sin seguir las directrices de edición organizada. [0] Por favor comunique a la persona u organización encargada para que se ponga en contacto mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada