piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:43:15+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks.
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:43:59+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks.
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:44:48+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks.
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:45:22+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks.
bhousel (2017-03-25 19:47:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Владимир К (2017-03-29 07:36:02+00:00): Подобные комментарии в названии неуместны
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:46:02+00:00): 
Dear, please stop add banks.
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:46:50+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks.
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:47:32+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks
andi9876 (2017-03-26 10:23:53+00:00): no viewpoint there, deleted
Spanholz (2017-03-24 10:11:45+00:00): You have connect streets and footways. Only then they will be used for routing.
Benny Goodman (2017-12-19 23:34:19+00:00): Hi nevw,

I'm wondering how it's possible to create a new, extremely wrong farm multipolygon while doing a maproulette cleanup task?

Just kidding,
but I'm still interested in the reason.

Greetings,
Benny
nevw (2017-12-20 06:30:09+00:00): Mate, that's too long ago for me to remember. You can put them duplicate segments back if you wish  :)
Greetings for Christmas and New Year.
nevw (2017-12-20 09:00:52+00:00): Hi Benny
I had a look in Josm, then reverted the changeset, then used the JOSM Validator on the polygon and found the problem was at this position…

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3kbk3wkhox14hzz/self%20intersect.png?dl=0

I then un-did the revert (back to what Map Roulette did to it) and saw that Map Roulette split off that small polygon and converted the 2 polygons into a multipolygon, which seems the best way map things that have seperate polygon bits. I think a few other small polygons could also be treated in the same way. If you zoom in really close on those you can see that they don’t intersect and have a small gap between the lines so that the Map Roulette routine did not detect an error.

I have not saved anything doing this so all should be ok.

 regards
Nev
Spanholz (2017-03-24 10:16:13+00:00): I wouldn't map sidewalks seperately. This only adds complexity and residential streets imply sidewalks in my eyes. 

Have a look at this example what happens when footwalks are not connected to streets: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=mapzen_foot&route=43.06227%2C-86.23101%3B43.06206%2C-86.23155#map=19/43.06239/-86.23226
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:48:22+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:48:57+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:49:41+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks
pitscheplatsch (2017-03-24 12:51:54+00:00): Hi martinmbaihaqi. May I know the reason behind deleting so many buildings in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47113972
woodpeck (2017-03-28 21:50:36+00:00): You have aligned this one island with Bing imagery, but the three nearby islands were horribly out of sync with imagery and you haven't even made an attempt to repair them too. Why the focus on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
James Millar (2017-03-30 02:43:25+00:00): I found this island through a MapRoulette challenge, I’m part of a small group who are attempting to improve the alignment of these islands using MapRoulette and JOSM.
SomeoneElse (2017-04-18 10:15:59+00:00): Hi James.
There have been worrying changes such as this elsewhere; you simply can't rely on Bing imagery where it might be offset (which is anywhere that you don't have something else to corroborate it).
Can you explain who the "small group" are?  
Your profile doesn't say anything about who you are or who you work for.  OSM is a community - we need to communicate with one another to get stuff done.
Best Regards,
Andy
James Millar (2017-04-19 02:09:13+00:00): Hi Andy,
We also use Mapbox, and by using a combination we can usually make improvements to these islands regardless of potential Bing offset. Alternatively we make the decision to not make any edits in an area (we do this often). Can you point me to some of the worrying changes? I can always fix them if you let me know. 
Thank you for the comment,
James
SomeoneElse (2017-04-19 07:58:14+00:00): Re "worrying changes", you can see a discussion with comments at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/imagico/diary/40759 .
Also, you're saying "we" again.  Who exactly are "we"?
Best Regards,
Andy
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-26 09:59:42+00:00): Ah thanks for fixing that up, and welcome to OSM!
woodpeck (2017-03-28 22:07:47+00:00): You have moved the nodes making up this island http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224776118 but neither Bing nor Mapbox imagery actually are good enough to even see that island. Your source specification ("Bing") must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
Kate Diaz (2017-03-30 02:22:06+00:00): You are right, I should not have moved the nodes making up that island. It is simply not visible in Bing or Mapbox. Please observe that I made these edits 6 days ago, and since then I have avoided making similar edits when no imagery is available. I certainly won’t any more. I am finding these jagged islands through a MapRoulette challenge, and I wanted to improve each island as much as possible. I see now that these good intentions can introduce errors to OSM.
manoharuss (2017-03-24 05:34:47+00:00): This relation is now broken https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6579950
manoharuss (2017-03-24 05:51:03+00:00): Hi AragonChristopherR17Z,

I understand a large relation is manageable by splitting it into smaller relations. But the bay area relation here seems broken. May I suggest using JOSM for easier manipulation of relations. I understand that you have created these relations in the first place and maintain the relation. But the ways in the relation currently do not roles, the outers are not closed. I can definitely help you sort this bay area into a nice single relation that can be easier to be maintained over time. Let me know what you think.

Thanks,
Manohar
Warin61 (2017-03-28 05:19:14+00:00): Fixed multipolygon 7102520. The ways should not touch ... Also added landcover=grass tag.
WoodWoseWulf (2017-03-28 08:40:35+00:00): Thank you as always for proofing :)
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
Jothirnadh (2017-03-24 20:57:31+00:00): A turn restriction is only valid if it has `from`, `via` and `to` members given in the relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction). You forgot to add `to` in this case. I fixed it but wanted to let you know of this :)
mavl (2019-01-19 16:43:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
mavl (2019-01-19 16:43:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
eggie (2017-03-24 07:58:33+00:00): Ja.. dat kon beter highway=service blijven. 
In het begin volgens wij startende mappers. ook om te helpen als ze op problemen stuiten. Verstandig om met mappen in osm op dit parkje te beginnen.
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
eggie (2017-03-24 08:13:16+00:00): Wellicht kan die adresnode 6t nog naar het overgebleven gebouw.
eggie (2017-03-24 08:19:58+00:00): Je kunt ook via het forum van OSM gebouwen laten importeren.. dan staan de officiële BAG info erop. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Kies voor Verzoek BAG import en zet de hyperlink erbij. Inlog account is identiek aan OSM account.
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
tux67 (2017-03-25 10:08:01+00:00): Hallo TomaszPrus,

da ist wohl was schief gegangen. Du hast einen leeren Punkt angelegt, der wieder gelöscht wurde.

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden: 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 
Gruß 
Stephan (tux67)
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf 
Wichtig auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
AkuAnakTimur (2017-03-24 08:12:45+00:00): Thanks for your edit. However, "Selamat Datang" is definitely "Welcome" in the Malay language. It's okay, later I will remove the name but not the place.
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:50:14+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:50:44+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks
Владимир К (2017-03-24 10:55:36+00:00): к сожалению, уже отмечена 5 дней назад.
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:51:22+00:00): 
Dear, please stop add banks
emergency99 (2017-03-24 11:09:03+00:00): I don't think that this is correct mapping. The cameras are cameras, bit that is not their name! Please undo this.
andi9876 (2017-03-24 16:52:00+00:00): Dear, please stop add banks
highflyer74 (2017-04-07 10:01:00+00:00): Moin smarties!

Danke für das Hinzufügen der Adressen. Sei bitte so nett, die Adressen am Gebäude zu belassen und sie nicht auf Adress Nodes zu setzen. Wir haben in Bremen das Übereinkommen, daß Adressen an das Gebäude getaggt werden, da dieses die Adresse innehat. Sollten sich mehrere Adressen am Gebäude befinden, bekommen die verschiedenen Eingänge die Adresse.

Danke!
smarties (2017-04-07 20:03:10+00:00): Hallo Oliver,
Du hast eine E-Mail von mir erhalten mit der Antwort.


Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Stephan
aka smarties
emergency99 (2017-03-24 11:09:37+00:00): I don't think that this is correct mapping. The cameras are cameras, bit that is not their name! Please undo this.
literan (2017-03-24 12:27:25+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо вам за правки. Вот этот пруд https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482433148 я вырезал из леса (внес в мультиполигон леса с ролью inner) ибо ведь из воды деревья не растут ))
PiaHurricane (2017-03-24 12:31:17+00:00): Спасибо! Я, признаться, еще не разобрался с водоемами. Почитаю вики
literan (2017-03-24 12:34:40+00:00): Ну, это касается не водоемов только, а объектов вообще. Чтобы сделать объект с дыркой (например, здания школ такие бывают), надо сделать мультиполигон. Вот здесь подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_-_%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BD
literan (2017-03-24 12:35:38+00:00): чтобы их легко делать в редакторе JOSM, ставьте плагин RelToolBox
emergency99 (2017-03-24 11:09:48+00:00): I don't think that this is correct mapping. The cameras are cameras, bit that is not their name! Please undo this.
tux67 (2017-03-24 21:25:37+00:00): Hi jalei,

referring to Google maps is not a legal source wiithin OSM.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Please get data from an open source.


BR
tux67
jalei (2017-03-25 07:30:20+00:00): Thanks tux,
I will delete the change and look for another source.
Sorry for that mistake!
tux67 (2017-03-25 09:19:27+00:00): No problem, thanks for your efforts to contribute ..
andi9876 (2017-04-02 16:08:06+00:00): Dear, please stop add attractions.
Basstoelpel (2018-04-11 08:35:01+00:00): Moin salix01,

hier (und an mindetens einer weiteren Stelle) hast Du wohl ein falsches addr:street eingetragen. Aufgefallen ist das nur, weil auf https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/map#15/52.4400/9.5671/osm-wrongcity-wrongstreet-outsideplz-dupes Duplikate erscheinen. Magst Du das bitte korrigieren?

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
salix01 (2018-04-11 08:53:35+00:00): Hoppla, zu schnell beim mappen gewesen.
Danke für den Hinweis!
SHARCRASH (2017-03-24 14:08:51+00:00): Please make sure you are using the right tags for every element... Check the Wiki! Tracks are more adapted for rural zones since these ways are often unmaintained (no asphalt, partially or if asphalt they are dirty, have stones left by tractors, etc). They can also be flat and compacted, check tracktype description in Wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
SHARCRASH (2017-03-24 14:13:18+00:00): I corrected already. But please check the Wiki since you have been contributing in OSM for a long time. Thanks!
tux67 (2017-03-25 20:26:11+00:00): Hi Qendrim Rexha,

this clinic was already mapped and your additional entry has been removed.

BR
tux67
MKnight (2017-03-24 18:47:07+00:00): Die outline von 7026968 hat level=1 da stimmt irgendwas nicht.

f4map zeigt garnix an, warum hab ich gerade nicht rausgefunden.
osmkreisre (2017-03-27 06:57:10+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, das wird noch einmal überprüft. Das Problem der fehlenden Anzeige ist bekannt, möglicherweise sollten alle Level-Relationen gelöscht werden und nur ein Gebäude getaggt werden?
MKnight (2017-03-27 09:27:54+00:00): Ich glaube building an die outline statt in die Relation könnte schon reichen.
osmkreisre (2017-03-30 11:05:36+00:00): Ja, da hat ein Tag in dem eigentlich schon vorhandenen Gebäude gefehlt. Es sollte nun wieder angezeigt werden.
Ist die Ordnung der Stockwerke als Relationen überhaupt sinnvoll?
MKnight (2017-03-30 13:50:30+00:00): Gute Frage, ich zumindest blick da nich durch ;)
osmkreisre (2017-03-30 14:11:32+00:00): Leider ist das mit dem Indoor Mapping auch nicht allzu einheitlich geregelt, deswegen wurde versucht, sich an bestehenden Beispielen zu orientieren. Eine reine Angabe der Level-Ebene der Räume ist wohl ausreichend zur Zuordnung. Die Relationen wurden nur vorgenommen, da verschiedene Grundrisse bei den Stockwerken bestehen.
osmkreisre (2017-03-30 14:13:05+00:00): In der nächsten Bearbeitungsphase (in zwei Wochen) werden dann die Relationen wohl rausfallen und nur noch rooms, areas und corridors übrig bleiben.
Nakaner (2017-03-31 08:23:55+00:00): Hallo osmkreisre,

entnehme ich deinen Kommentaren, dass du nicht aus eigenem, privaten Antrieb in OSM editierst? Falls ja, dann mache das bitte auf deiner Benutzerseite kenntlich. Bitte denke daran, dass ein Benutzerkonto nur von einer einzigen Person benutzt werden sollte.

Viele Grüße

Michael
osmkreisre (2017-04-12 12:49:31+00:00): Die Daten wurden im Rahmen einer Praktikumsarbeit erfasst, also durchaus selbstmotiviert und dienen keinem anderen Zweck als der möglichst genauen Erfassung des Bereichs. Dabei wurde sich in der Umsetzung ganz den Richtlinien von OSM untergeordnet. Die Bearbeitung wurde bisher auch nur von einer Person durchgeführt, dass nicht der private Account genutzt wurde hat den Hintergrund, dass dadurch zukünftig die getätigten Bearbeitungen intern leichter nachvollzogen werden können.
osmkreisre (2017-04-12 12:54:47+00:00): Allerdings macht eine Kennzeichnung des Hintergrunds des Kreises Recklinghausen durchaus Sinn. Auch die Beschränkung auf nur eine Person pro Account kann in Zukunft umgesetzt werden.
emergency99 (2017-03-24 11:10:07+00:00): I don't think that this is correct mapping. The cameras are cameras, bit that is not their name! Please undo this.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-03 02:17:43+00:00): essa balsa ainda existe?
kartler175 (2017-04-08 21:48:09+00:00): Please connect highways with highways, not highways with lanuse boundaries: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=mapzen_car&route=45.5724%2C-73.7682%3B45.5731%2C-73.7669
OSM is not Corel Draw for maps.
poornibadrinath (2017-03-24 19:22:41+00:00): Hi Maci5741, 
  I came across your edits and noticed you have added leisure=park tags for all the nodes and also natural=water for swimming pools. Please refer to the correct way of tagging features on OSM before you map. Here's a guide to help you: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags. Leisure=park tags are added to a polygon and not on nodes and swimming pools are tagged as leisure=swimming_pool and not natural=water. It is always good to recheck before adding the features on OSM. Happy Mapping :)
Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
emergency99 (2017-03-24 11:10:18+00:00): I don't think that this is correct mapping. The cameras are cameras, bit that is not their name! Please undo this.
emergency99 (2017-03-24 11:10:30+00:00): I don't think that this is correct mapping. The cameras are cameras, bit that is not their name! Please undo this.
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
emergency99 (2017-03-24 11:11:20+00:00): I don't think that this is correct mapping. The cameras are cameras, bit that is not their name! Please undo this.
emergency99 (2017-03-24 11:11:47+00:00): Also goes for escalators!
Geofreund1 (2019-04-30 16:45:38+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe,
du hast in Poppenweiler zwischen Hochberger Straße und Südstraße einen Weg (?) eingezeichnet, allerdings ohne Tags. Um was für einen Weg handelt es sich da?
Peilscheibe (2019-04-30 17:15:16+00:00): Oh, ein vergessener Weg. Das ist ein Fußweg, habs nachgetragen. Danke fürs finden.
eggie (2017-03-24 15:31:32+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-24 15:37:08+00:00): Let er even op dat leisure=park los over de landuse grass, forest, village_green hoort te liggen. Leisure  geeft de functie aan. landuse hoe het eruit ziet. De landuse van de geïmporteerde 3dshapes "moet" dus behouden worden en het park met naam er los overheen gelegd worden. De voorgaande mapper heeft voor een deel die "fout" al gemaakt.
eggie (2017-03-24 16:11:08+00:00): Er zaten wat goede edits bij. daar hebben we wat aan. De "parken" heb ik aangepast. Ook de vorm van het water van de Aamseplas.
De tuin en dat zgn Kalmoeslaanpark is verwijderd. Wat is de bedoeling van je edit? Pokamon?
Graag reactie.
In het begin volgen wij beginnende mappers. Er is hier genoeg serieus werk te doen. Aan al die parkjes en grote speeltuinen die er niet zijn hebben we niet zoveel en geeft schade aan de kaart.

Daarom: Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
mapper999 (2017-03-24 18:45:43+00:00): Hallo diehills,
bitte beachte, dass name=* nur für Eigennamen gedacht ist. Für die genauere Beschreibung von Baumsorten gibt es beispielsweise species=* und genus=*.
Viele Grüße, mapper999
diehills (2017-03-27 20:37:05+00:00): Hallo mapper999,
danke für deinen Hinweis, Ich werde das in Zukunft berücksichtigen.
Da habe ich aber auch mal gleich eine Frage.
Ich habe es schon öfters gesehen das auf Gebäuden ein zusätzlicher Punkt mit der Adresse gesetzt wurde. Wie sollte man hier vorgehen. Ich habe bisher immer die Adresse am Gebäude eingetragen.
Viele Grüße, diehills
mapper999 (2017-04-02 13:30:53+00:00): Hallo diehills,
ich persönlich trage die Hausnummern auch lieber am Gebäude ein, es kann aber Fälle geben bei denen Punkte praktischer sind, z.B. bei unterschiedlichen Adressen im selben Gebäude. Viele Grüße
mavl (2019-01-19 16:43:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
tux67 (2017-03-24 21:18:55+00:00): Hallo Jannik112,

könntest du deine Changesets bitte genau bezeichnen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_.C3.84nderungssatz-Kommentare
Gruß
tux67
richlv (2017-03-27 12:18:36+00:00): hi there and thank you a lot for the improvements :)

maybe you can take a look at these steps here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429780132 .
can they be connected to the nearby road - maybe by a footway or a path ?

that would be great to do, as disconnected ways cause issues for routing engines.
thank you again for helping osm :)
HatemBA (2017-03-25 12:05:37+00:00): Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0
RobJN (2017-03-31 19:25:28+00:00): You can use the strava display to see where people are commonly walking:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava#Global_Heatmap
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
mavl (2019-01-19 16:43:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
eggie (2017-03-24 16:39:03+00:00): Alleen nu zit er bos in het water. 'k Zal eens kijken.
Het is beter om het land van het water te scheiden.