piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Silva1989 (2021-08-07 17:39:59+00:00): Hello, and thanks for commenting.
Are you talking about those instances where multipolygon outer lines touch each other?
I can go ahead and begin addressing those issues, do you think that would be worth the effort? I guess it's important to have the data on a way that makes it easily manageable so, having those lines touching each other makes it easier on a low-experience user to disconnect nodes and build a new polygon for instance, and that could be done without dealing with multipolygons. On the other hand, is there an advantage on taking up such an endeavour besides the reduction on the number of lines?
Filip009 (2021-08-07 18:50:53+00:00): I´m talking about each line. When you use multipolygon, you will have just one way and give it a role (outer or inner). Look at my edit here (I reccomend to look at it in JOSM) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109113371 I think it is looking better, you move just one point on one way and you move with two multipolygons. In my opinion, editing of landuse is only for at least amateur mapper. I think than new mapper will start with adding some POI and then continue with roads and only after he have some experience he will do something with landuse. If he will do some mistakes, like he will draw many new lines and you will see that, you can write him under his changeset and tell him how to do that correctly. If you will need help with mutlipolygons feel free to write me DM and we can make some call on some other platform. (Sorry for my English, is not the best :D)
gscholz (2021-08-15 06:59:24+00:00): Hi Mahesh Gandla,
your buildings are of a very low quality. They do not have a rectangular shape, are mostly to big, stick together even they are clearly separated, have duplicate nodes etc.

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-90.92166&lat=15.48869&zoom=11&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Please urgently improve your mapping style.
Kind Regards
Guido
aklopau_kontur (2021-12-27 11:31:45+00:00): Hi AhmadHB.
Thank you for your contributing in OSM.
I can't find any information about population in source that you mention (isna.ir)
Could you be more specific about the source? I would like to add information about the population in Iran but cannot find any good source yet.
Thanks.
SHARCRASH (2021-08-04 17:19:59+00:00): Proofs: 
● Imagery + GPS Heatmap in deleted state https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wX049ZQueffa0IahpDtJyNMedfvqvBHQ , Imagery + GPS Heatmap in restored state https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Slz26zZc6M-FldCLdUCX1P8Som67BSDN 
● GPS file from 2021.08.02 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z493K-ikgzETAJEUxry6v8qp0IuaH8gM 
● video on way 690602860 + scrubs 690602859 here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SuIwEDTAQDRPDD5D8XBzv4n9n5B8dMSJ
SHARCRASH (2021-08-04 17:30:34+00:00): ●  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471608525 which was deleted (see history v4) leads to hiking structures: path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471608525 and handrail https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970422020 and serves as alternate path up to path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471608530
Paavobave (2021-08-04 17:41:53+00:00): Hi, paths should be removed only if not visible in the field. Tag "access=private" would is the right solution for this path.
Fuuga (2021-08-05 07:39:35+00:00): The problem is that if they are visible, routing software shall make autorouting thru the privat area. It's not a path on the private coutyard, it's coutyard.
dentonny (2021-08-28 07:44:10+00:00): Ik ben er van de week eens langsgeweest. Het fonteintje is wel stuk en ik weet niet of er plannen zijn om het te maken. Er is nogal veel 'overlast' daar rondom...
alester (2021-08-04 18:01:39+00:00): Highway 4 officially starts at the 19 interchange, and this is supported by the signage, so it shouldn't be extended as far as the Rupert Road roundabout.

The section of road between Rupert Road and Highway 19 is officially named "Memorial Avenue", though the signage seems to be inadequate.

The "Alberni Highway" name is carried by Highway 4A, so only the part of Highway 4 west of the 4/4A intersection (Coombs Junction) should carry this name. The section from Coombs Junction to Highway 19 may actually be "Memorial Avenue" officially based on some sources, but "Route 4" signage at the EB exit 60 intersection contradicts this, so I've given it the generic name "Highway 4" to match other highways in BC.
stefanct (2021-08-04 19:43:57+00:00): Hi,
bitte nur Objekte mit name taggen, die wirklich einen "offiziellen" Namen haben. "Kläranlage" ist kein solcher, sondern eine Beschreibung. Letztere könnte man mit dem Key description hinterlegen. In diesem Fall wäre es aber viel besser, den richtigen Tag zu verwenden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwastewater_plant bzw. building=industrial, wenn das Klärwerk mehr als nur das Gebäude ist.

Die Webseite vom HFC scheint tot zu sein BTW.

LG
jcarlson (2021-08-05 14:30:35+00:00): Hey there! Thanks for making so many great additions to the map!
One bit of advice: I see you're using the iD editor. iD is a fantastic tool, but it can often lead to objects being snapped to one another that shouldn't be. Some of your landuse additions got snapped to Plainfield's administrative boundary. In general, admin boundaries shouldn't snap to anything but other admin boundaries.
In iD, you can open the Map Data menu and turn boundaries off, and that will prevent you from accidentally editing boundaries.
Happy Mapping!
jcarlson (2021-08-05 14:33:01+00:00): PS - I'm already working on fixing those boundaries, so no worries.
aweech (2021-08-04 21:49:08+00:00): Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. I was able to confirm from other sources that the trail from Guardsman Pass was posted as closed for re-vegetation. However, I was not able to confirm that you can no longer walk around the east side of the lake to continue on to Lackawaxen Lake. I did read that dogs are not allowed within 100 feet of the lake, so maybe you wanted to add the tag "dog=no". I restored the trail around the east side of the lake.
zyphlar (2021-08-06 20:24:37+00:00): Hi there, this is a dangerous edit, I have fixed it but Baker Avenue's sidewalk does not have a pedestrian crossing with HWY 101; it's a bridge. This edit would basically have people's GPSes assuming that there's a pedestrian crosswalk crossing 7 lanes of interstate, which isn't the case. I've changed the elevated segment of sidewalk to be a bridge to correct this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109283174
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109160765
GerdP (2023-02-26 18:59:56+00:00): Moin!
Sehe ich das richtig, dass die Radrouten, die z.Z. noch über die K 217, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27645812 
verlaufen, eigentlich auf den neuen Radweg gehören?
Romwriter (2023-02-27 13:08:19+00:00): Von der zuständigen Behörde ist das wohl so gewünscht. Allerdings habe ich etwas Mühe, das ernst zu nehmen: Auf dem Weg von Tecklenburg nach Deichshausen beginnt linksseitig ein Bürgersteig, der mit einem (entgegen Ziffer III.9 der Verwaltungsvorschrift zu §§ 39 bis 43 StVO) links vom Bürgersteig stehenden, kaum erkennbaren Vz 240 als benutzungspflichtig beschildert wird. Ein Grund gegen die Fahrbahnbenutzung ist dort nicht erkennbar. Da versucht die Behörde, Radfahrer mitten in einer Linkskurve (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2630625428) diagonal durch den Gegenverkehr zu schicken? Fahrrad-Wegweisung gibt es bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2630625428 nicht, deswegen bin ich unsicher, an welcher Stelle die beschilderte Radtour von der Fahrbahn auf den Radweg wechseln soll. Ich habe das in dem Changeset nicht angefasst.
GerdP (2023-02-27 13:17:59+00:00): Ich bin nur drauf gestoßen, weil da ein bicycle=use_sidepath an der Fahrbahn hängt. Kenne mich aber nicht aus in der Gegend. Ich mappe momentan die Radrelation im Naturpark Wildeshauser Geest und da bin ich u.a. auf die Kleeblattroute Lemwerder gestoßen, die nicht mehr ganz OK ist. Vielleicht kannst Du da ja mal nachschauen, wie die im Norden genau verläuft? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1177169
Romwriter (2023-03-05 14:16:58+00:00): erledigt, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133326921
GerdP (2023-03-05 14:20:13+00:00): Danke!
VictorIE (2024-05-11 07:28:18+00:00): Salut,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5534141615

power=18 ?
fgouget (2025-02-27 10:33:44+00:00): Bonjour,

Je n'ai fait que changer le champ website. Le champ power=18 était déjà présent avant mon changeset donc je ne sais pas ce qu'il signifiait. Depuis la valeur a été transférée dans charging_station:output ce qui semble plausible.

Cordialement,
bxl-forever (2021-08-05 10:36:19+00:00): Thanks for spotting this.  I also fixed the name on other parts of the road and on houses all at once.
Baloo Uriza (2021-08-05 16:37:53+00:00): This is clearly a bad edit.  I 40 is not the name of this road, it's the ref, and it was already tagged.  The name is signed regularly along this section and the source:name=* tag clearly indicates when it was renamed.  See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Also was this surveyed as having actually been changed on these segments for the speed limit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109161511
Kyler Williams (2021-10-27 16:27:44+00:00): Yes this has been surveyed. I have 30 trucks that run these roads daily as well as myself. And this is Interstate 40 in Oklahoma. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_40
Baloo Uriza (2021-10-27 18:02:53+00:00): Cool!  Perhaps you can consider getting some trucks equipped with cameras for Mapillary?  The image recognition they perform feeds the Osmose tool which can quickly identify new changes for mappers.
DressyPear4 (2021-08-04 22:00:59+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta.
Da maneira que estava antes é o correto.
Fiz as correções.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109162134
mariotomo (2021-08-04 21:03:24+00:00): indeed: you're mapping Bing, which is hugely out of date.  please check with the community and if you still have time it would be hugely appreciated if you would redo using Maxar, or undo.
mariotomo (2021-09-12 14:04:22+00:00): I reverted this, in 111097930
Dawid2849 (2021-08-04 20:03:58+00:00): Cześć. Twoja zmiana zniszczyła rondo Pamięci Ofiar Wołynia i galerię handlową, więc ją wycofałem. Proszę, bądź bardziej uważny co robisz.
zluuzki (2021-08-04 19:49:41+00:00): Please fix theese warnings. I did not even touch 95% of these objects.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-08-05 02:07:47+00:00): Hello VietCoCute, welcome to OSM! Hope you are doing well.
Is this park many or just one?
**
Xin chào VietCoCute, chào mừng đến với OSM! Mong là mọi việc đều ổn.
Công viên này có nhiều hay chỉ một?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109162767
VietCoCute (2021-08-06 11:27:31+00:00): Hi, sorry for the mistake . There is just one park and I already edited it. Thank for the review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109162767
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-08-06 12:14:57+00:00): Thank you for your reply.
No problem at all. You have a good starting point. Keep go on.
Cheers
eggie (2021-08-04 20:13:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback : Wanneer er bord staat voor voetgangers verboden heb je het correct getagd.

De Penitentiaire Inrichtingen  zijn al getagd hier op de vlakken  en die tagging name=Penitentiaire Inrichting op de gebouwen  kunnen beter weg, Ik heb ze maar vast verwijderd. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-08-05 02:07:42+00:00): Hello VietCoCute, welcome to OSM! Hope you are doing well.
Is this park many or just one?
**
Xin chào VietCoCute, chào mừng đến với OSM! Mong là mọi việc đều ổn.
Công viên này có nhiều hay chỉ một?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109163025
VietCoCute (2021-08-06 11:45:08+00:00): Hi, sorry for the mistake . There is only one park and I already edited it. Thank for the review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109163025
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-08-06 12:14:56+00:00): Thank you for your reply.
No problem at all. You have a good starting point. Keep go on.
Cheers
mariotomo (2021-08-04 20:44:44+00:00): hola y buenos días.  seeing your changeset count, I'm surprised you have trouble with mapping inside towns.  we have enough to do mapping isolated buildings, in rural areas, most valuable when they are in flood-prone areas, which is anywhere along a river here in Panamá.  you're very welcome to help us there.
mariotomo (2021-09-12 14:20:04+00:00): possibly completed the review in changeset:111098608
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
ottwiz (2021-08-04 20:34:51+00:00): + Reclassified County Roads based on their connection and tagging scheme.
mariotomo (2021-08-04 20:39:39+00:00): hi. very useful and very welcome.  only please do consider Maxar, it's generally newer than Bing and where Bing is newer, Maxar is still sometimes preferable.  do check with the community.  we meet on Telegram, or in forum #61.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:34:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
MxxCon (2021-08-05 00:47:39+00:00): What addresses? Where? Added to where? Adjusted how? Based on what? Your changeset contains almost 1000 changes and covers 4 continents. It couldn't be split up into smaller, more geographically-specific changesets?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109163841
Dr Kludge{import} (2021-08-05 04:41:45+00:00): Yeah! I download two objects where I mixed up the a relation number for a way number.  I made sure that the two items I touched else where were left as the way they were.  Next time I will save the file and remove the opps.   All the real changes are in central Phoenix AZ off 19th Avenue.
Dr Kludge{import} (2021-08-05 04:43:08+00:00): Here are the two way numbers if you want to check them out.  8413310, v12
7639947, v2
pitscheplatsch (2021-08-06 09:09:14+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109145106
MxxCon (2021-08-05 00:51:42+00:00): Hello.
Please elaborate how did you update roads?
Also, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109164146
ika-chan! (2024-06-06 04:31:02+00:00): Will the Kaart team please be more careful when reclassifying junctions with motorways? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370309020 needs to be primary_link, because non-motorway traffic can turn south from Marathonos westbound to Nikou Milisi southbound.
user_10241830 (2021-08-05 04:26:09+00:00): Hallo,

nur so aus Neugier (nicht als Kritik verstehen): gibt es eigentlich irgendeinen Grund, wieso dieser Zuglauf an der Grenze aufgeteilt und als zwei getrennte Linien erfasst wird, obwohl es sich um einen durchgehenden Zug handelt? Dass der Zug auf tschechischer Seite anders heißt als auf der deutschen Seite, ließe sich ja lösen, siehe die grenzüberschreitenden Linien nach Frankreich. Gibt es da irgendwelche zwingenden technischen oder sonstige Gründe, dass dieser Zug in OSM nicht als ein durchgehender Zuglauf erfasst werden kann?
marcoSt (2021-08-05 09:29:00+00:00): Hallo eiskalt-glasklar,

Das frage ich mich auch. Ich habe diese beiden Streckenteile nur so vorgefunden und ergänzt. 

Mein Tagging-Stil wäre das nicht. Ich hätte die Bahnlinie in einem Stück gemappt, die jeweiligen refs, networks, operators + die Namen in den jeweiligen Ländersprachen hineingepackt und gut ist. 

Habe ich schon des Öfteren bei Buslinien, die verschiedenen Netzwerken angehören und verschiedene refs besitzen, gemacht. siehe https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html,  https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-RBO-Analysis.html und https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-VLK-Analysis.html. 

Auch bei den Flixbuslinien, die ich gemappt habe, habe ich immer den Namen in der jeweiligen Landessprache ergänzt, in der der Bus hindurch fährt oder eine Haltestelle besitzt.

Also von meiner Seite sehe ich keinen Grund dazu, die Strecke nicht einem Stück zu taggen.

Vg Marco
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
aweech (2021-08-04 21:59:50+00:00): Hi,
The amenity=bank tag is for full service bank-like businesses with tellers and lending agents. You might be thinking of the amenity=atm tag. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Datm for more information.
bevalim (2021-09-04 20:14:16+00:00): Ok, got it, will use amenity=atm instead
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
martinst (2021-08-04 21:41:27+00:00): tracktype=* macht bei highway=path keinen Sinn, siehe OSM-Wiki.
Könntest Du das verbessern?
lumapu (2021-08-04 21:48:32+00:00): klar, ist schon geschehen, danke für den Hinweis!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:34:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SK53 (2021-08-04 22:13:09+00:00): Accidentally used, old changeset description. This was adding the house Afallon on S side of river. It was the former minister's house (on older maps called Blaen-Dyffryn), but Afallon on the post-WWII 1:10560, which is it's current name & the name when my mother lived there 1941-4 (ish).
MrMoehritz (2021-08-09 08:19:51+00:00): Hallo Jschi,
wilkommen bei OSM. Super erster Edit!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:34:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
ovruni (2021-08-04 23:09:07+00:00): Hola, el uso de la etiqueta de nombre se encuentra destinada para objetos que tienen un nombre particular, no para nombres genéricos o descripciones. [0] Por otra parte, los puestos de periódico en la calle se etiquetan como kiosk [1]. La etiqueta newsagent se encuentran destinadas a locales dentro de un edificio que principalmente venden revistas y periódicos. [2]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dkiosk
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:shop%3Dnewsagent
eggie (2021-08-05 04:05:21+00:00): Dag Guus..
Tip.
Gebruik de bestaande adresnode om op bij te taggen.
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2021-08-05 11:10:25+00:00): Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
mueschel (2021-08-08 14:05:36+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
you used many tags here that are not in use in any other place. Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.
felipeeugenio (2021-08-05 13:23:50+00:00): Estimado.
El tag biulding es para las estructuras, no para la parcela completa. Y por favor no usar nombres. Le está diciendo a todo internet quien vive ahí
ivanbranco (2021-08-17 20:39:19+00:00): Hi Anna, 

I don't understand what are you trying to describe here, montain=mountain is not a valid tag. Are you trying to add a peak named Öneberget Östersund? in that case you could add a node natural=peak+name=Öneberget Östersund in the highest point of that area.
DressyPear4 (2021-08-05 09:47:12+00:00): Olá, se for visível pode ser mapeado.
Nesse caso você pode adicionar "access=private"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109167974
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-08-05 22:32:30+00:00): changeset revertido.