piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archie (2022-06-28 01:41:32+00:00): Får jag lov att fråga; varför raderade du ett skogs-mp med 132 medlemmar (https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=120220769) jfr (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9767759/history) för nu två månader sedan?
När man tittar på det av dig  raderade skogs-mp så slås man av hur väl avgränsat det var; på tre sidor av kabelledningsgator och mot öster av skogsbryn mot E22. Mycket lätt att hantera. Outers närmast självklara, återstod bara att sköta inners ordentligt. På vilket sätt i hela fiden var det en "konstig konstruktion" (din kommentar till ändringarna/raderingen)? Att det finns skoggsområden inom skogsområden är dessvärre inte så ovanligt, men då ser man bara till att infoga dessa som "inners" om det rör sig om en annan skogstyp än det omgivande skogs-mp eller i annat fall raderar man dessa skogsområden av samma slag (tårta-på-tårta). Du har förstört en - om än inte perfekt - skogsyta med en blank yta och har börjat med att rita in många små skogsområden som helt saknar naturliga gränser mot varandra. Detta sista är sannerligen att göra en "konstig konstruktion" samt att göra framtida editering besvärlig.
Skinfaxi (2022-07-14 18:39:08+00:00): Vi har väl inte som mål att göra kartan bunt utan att har bra information. Rör man sig ute i marken märker man att det data sällan stämmer - och här kan Du läsa hur föränderingen i skogsbruket få sitt nedslag även i media https://www.dagensvastervik.se/nyheter/e/123079/vaxande-trend-med-att-plantera-tallskog-fordubbling-i-de-sodra-skogarna/

Man kan alltid diskuterar hur mycket energi man lägger att reparerar multipolygoner med 128 medlemmar och om det är en fördel att det är någrant avgränsad mot en nu nedgrävd elkabel. Även i elnätet - även här händer det mycket som man förutom att man ser det ute i naturen också kan läsa om i media https://via.tt.se/pressmeddelande/eon-investerar-drygt-150-miljoner-i-vimmerby-och-hultsfred?publisherId=1035173&releaseId=3324084

Men om ett skogsskifte har 128 medlemmar och bör har minst en dussin till är det ohanterligt och onnödigt komplicerad. Visst förstör man inget med flit, men ibland är det helt enkelt lättare att raderar och göra nytt.
Skinfaxi (2022-07-14 18:41:32+00:00): Men om man är ute och rör sig i den omeråde märker man ju bara att det t.ex. finns ett "hål" i en ledning. Utan att vi invänta mera aktuellt bildmaterial kan man inte avgöra om man nu har stött på en liten passage med en ny nedgrävd kabel för att t.ex. förbereda för anslutning av en vindpark eller om det har plockad ned hela ledningen på en längre sträckan. Därför låter jag dom elledingar i regel vara orröda.
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-29 17:03:22+00:00): Hi Mihaja,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
Leo Slager (2022-06-27 11:25:50+00:00): Hier heb je de landfill over de andere landuse heen getekend.
Op de kaart is de landfill nu dus begroeid met bomen.
ik maak even wat correcties.
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:55:07+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Leo Slager (2022-06-27 11:10:57+00:00): Dit soort aanduidingen horen niet thuis op de kaart.
Deze changeset wordt verwijderd.
pio2_122 (2022-06-27 08:19:25+00:00): *with highway=cycleway.
user_3022894 (2023-03-19 21:43:23+00:00): Hallo BKKart,

hierzu habe ich eine Frage. Und zwar verstehe ich ehrlich gesagt nicht, weshalb "bike_ride=yes" hier nicht gegeben sein sollte.

Die Definition von "bike_ride" ist luat OSM-Wiki: "Kennzeichnet einen Fahrradparkplatz in der Nähe einer ÖPNV-Haltestelle."

Das ist hier definitiv gegeben.

Dabei ist es unerheblich, um welche Art von Fahrradparkplatz es sich handelt, also ob es ein Fahrradparkhaus, eine abschließbare Box, ein Ständer mit Unterstand oder nur eine Abstellanlage im Freien ist. Ebenso ist unerheblich, ob ein Entgelt erhoben wird oder nicht.

bike_ride zeigt lediglich die Verknüpfung zu einer ÖPNV-Haltestelle an. Mehr nicht.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
MxxCon (2022-06-28 03:37:10+00:00): Hello.
Please note that name is NOT a description tag, as such business location description shouldn't be part of its name. For that we have address and "branch=" tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122897103
RicoElectrico (2022-06-27 12:55:05+00:00): Czy pieszy może przejść z jednej strony na drugą? Są tam jakieś bramy? Zawsze otwarte?
yabadabadu (2022-06-27 13:03:42+00:00): Nie ma tam przejścia dla pieszych, w części jest wybrukowane kostką Bauma, a część jest wybetonowana.
Jako tako, piesi mogą się poruszać, można to traktować jako droga dojazdowa do posesji.
Jest tam wolny dostęp.
RicoElectrico (2022-06-27 14:51:13+00:00): Ok, chciałem po prostu się upewnić, że nawigacja może bez problemu poprowadzić przez dziedziniec kamienicy.
RicoElectrico (2022-06-27 14:51:21+00:00): (mowa o pieszych)
yabadabadu (2022-06-30 05:20:04+00:00): Tak, jak najbardziej można tamtędy chodzić.
confusedbuffalo (2022-07-22 18:52:33+00:00): This isn't a greyhound stadium. Tags removed
gscscnd (2022-06-28 06:13:33+00:00): Za dużo zbędnych relacji. Zobacz wizualizację: <https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#122898189>.
user_8101879 (2022-07-03 12:50:22+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14299370 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:54:48+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Leo Slager (2022-06-27 11:14:04+00:00): Ook deze changeset wordt verwijderd.
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:54:30+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
literan (2022-06-27 17:07:25+00:00): не понимаю, зачем вы случайным образом в разных местах ставите теги пешеходных переходов?

откачу еще раз
Leo Slager (2022-06-27 11:18:26+00:00): De aanduiding nestkasten is niet de naam van dit bos. Dat wordt dus weer verwijderd van de kaart.
Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van verdere wijzigingen.
Probeer je eerst in te lezen in de materie. Het lijkt allemaal zo eenvoudig, maar er zit een geografische database achter de kaart met een heleboel regeltjes over hoe iets te mappen.
Als er vragen zijn, stel ze gerust, op het forum of middels een bericht aan ondergetekende.
Patr1k_P (2022-06-30 12:16:43+00:00): cesta bola zbytocne zmazana, stacilo upravit tagy...nabuduce sa snazte zachovavat historiu objektov (nemazat objekty ale ich upravit)
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:54:10+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:53:47+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:53:27+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:52:45+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
user_5359 (2022-08-12 14:14:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1073812984/history. What is the meaning of the tag itat = XGG? Did you mean iata instead of itat?
UWJ (2022-08-12 17:35:06+00:00): It means iata. I corrected this. Thanks! :)
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:52:27+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Ualik (2022-06-28 14:11:12+00:00): Вы лес сломали. Сами поправите или мне поправить? Через четыре часа поправлю если вы не исправите.
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:51:57+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Msiipola (2022-06-28 12:29:24+00:00): Ingen kommentar?
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:51:41+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:51:22+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
ivanbranco (2022-10-02 19:57:20+00:00): Hi Christina,

you added a lot of elements with hashtags as name, such as here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1073826783/history

Could you check it out and try to to fix it please? 

Good mapping!
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:51:02+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:50:24+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:50:06+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:49:41+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:49:24+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
RicoElectrico (2022-06-27 11:57:59+00:00): Poproszę o trochę więcej informacji czym jest ten obiekt, by go poprawnie zaznaczyć. Prywatny park? Chyba nie :)
RicoElectrico (2022-06-27 12:24:57+00:00): W internecie brak informacji o takim miejscu, wskazana jako zarządca osoba ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9850131744/history ) nie jest też właścicielem żadnej firmy. 

Jedyną poszlaką jest to, że na aktualnych (ale niskiej rozdzielczości) zdjęciach z Sentinela widać, że pewnie coś jest rozkopane: https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2L2A&lat=50.00340170500102&lng=20.257480144500732&zoom=16&preset=1_TRUE_COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=20&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2021-12-01%7C2022-06-27&atmFilter=&showDates=false
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:49:07+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:48:48+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:48:33+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:48:09+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:47:27+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:47:09+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:46:48+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Osmonde (2022-08-08 23:18:54+00:00): Hi the imagery you are using is out of date and does not represent the current layout of streets. 

Please revert all of your edits to Wellington crescent and associated footpaths, these have all be updated via GPS survey. 

And please use English commit messages when editing in North American regions.
gscholz (2022-06-28 04:34:13+00:00): Hi cammorinigo29,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.64224&lat=-27.33683&zoom=15

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122904646

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Adam_Piszczek (2023-02-12 20:50:28+00:00): Szlak tak przebiega ?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2758704#map=18/50.04334/19.51316&layers=C
Raczej nie .
VA00 (2023-02-13 06:14:49+00:00): Ja wtedy jechałem wschód-zachód i widziałem znaki szlaku więc go dodałem. Wydawało mi się dziwne, że zamiast iść prosto robi ,,dzióbek'' więc zostawiłem też poprzedni przebieg. Szlak był w ostatnich latach wielokrotnie zmieniany, a znakarzom nie chce się kasować starych znaków. Wypadałoby go przejechać na tym odcinku, co pewnie wkrótce zrobię, chyba że będziesz szybszy :-)
Adam_Piszczek (2023-02-13 08:54:51+00:00): Byłem wczoraj,szlak idzie w lewo od Źródła jak ten dzióbek.
VA00 (2023-02-13 09:38:19+00:00): Mówisz, że jest oznakowany tędy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185584500 ?
Adam_Piszczek (2023-02-13 10:09:00+00:00): Nie tak
VA00 (2023-02-13 11:16:56+00:00): Sprawdź czy teraz jest dobrze.
Adam_Piszczek (2023-02-13 11:30:45+00:00): Ok
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:46:11+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
jeslop (2022-06-27 12:23:46+00:00): V1LLORA, ¿cómo puede una vía ser primero río y a continuación camino? El dibujado que realizas en general no parece muy fiable, no es verificable, y además insistes en no responder a la cuestiones que te plantean https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11625447. 

La mayor parte de. los cambios que has realizado hoy serán revertidos, ya que no queda claro ni su realidad (¿tres restaurantes en una fábrica?, ¿la mayor parte de los restaurantes de la zona son de sushi?) ni su origen.

Sería de agradecer alguna explicación o el contacto con la comunidad local en caso de necesitar ayuda.

Saludos

Jesús López | OpenStreetMap Foundation | Data Working Group
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:45:47+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:45:27+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:45:10+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:44:49+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
miche101 (2022-06-27 16:15:10+00:00): Dankeschön fürs eintragen :)
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:44:26+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:44:05+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
MxxCon (2022-06-28 03:43:54+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change this from roundabout to circular?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122906071
Emey_lyft (2022-06-28 09:31:19+00:00): Hello, MxxCon.
	My name is Ruslan, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for paying attention to this. 
	According to the articles about roundabouts https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout and circulars https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular in OSMWiki, we assume that
the tag “junction=roundabout” is used only on road intersections where traffic on the roundabout has right of way, 
and 
the tag “junction=circular” is used only on road intersections where traffic on the junction does not have complete right of way.
	In one of the segments of our road ring (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276545921#map=19/40.56907/-73.86755), we have a "yield" regulatory sign and a "give way" road marking for drivers who ride on the ring, which means that our junction does not have complete right of way.
	These attributes of a circular intersection we can see in Bing Streetside
https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=40.569197~-73.867809&lvl=17&dir=238.365&style=x&v=2&sV=1, Bing Aerial Imagery, Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta. Also exactly at this point OSM already has a "yield" (highway=give_way) sign at the node. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/278222634).
Please correct me if I’m missing something, I will be happy to discuss further. 
Best regards, Ruslan.
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:43:30+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:42:55+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:37:56+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
Snalla (2022-06-29 12:42:14+00:00): I accidentally uploaded changeset comment from the previous task. Correct upload comment for this task is  Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
user_16124416 (2022-07-01 18:01:54+00:00): I am editing the map as a hobby, I do not have professional competence. It means that properly corrected error correction warnings in Turkey and Turkish origin countries are not valid in Germany. I did it in good faith and I have no intention of harming any map service. I learned how to filter iD's alerts afterwards. I read the guides quite well, but that's something I learned later with experience. Good day, my response is a little late. Thank you for reverting. <3
Snalla (2022-06-27 12:28:18+00:00): Comment given was wrong. Correct comment is Fixing keepright impossible angles logical issue #MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122906994
Adamant1 (2022-12-15 05:12:05+00:00): Hello. It looks like you screwed up a bunch of shop tags with this changeset and added a ton of unnecessary, clearly wrong tags to things. For instance you changed a motorcycle repair shop to a bicycle shop here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9808568290/history which is clearly wrong. 

You also pointlessly added amenity=bicycle_repair_station to a bunch of POIs that clearly aren't bicycle repair stations, like with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9808378956/history

In this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9808898003/history you added to shop=music to a music school. Which I assume is wrong. 

I'd appreciate it if you reviewed your edits in this changeset and fixed the ones that are obviously wrong, which appears to be most of them. Or just revert the edit outright. 

Thanks, 

Adamant1
Anil Basnet (2022-12-15 06:22:11+00:00): I checked out the points. The tagging were mixed up as mapping was done using JOSM. In JOSM, those tags were not rendered so it got mixed up. It was not intentional. Thanks for flagging. Please you can make corrections.
Adamant1 (2022-12-15 06:27:26+00:00): That's fine. Things happen. I corrected a few of them earlier. That's all I'm doing though. It's your responsibility to fix your own mistakes.
Anil Basnet (2022-12-15 07:17:07+00:00): Yes, I know, that's my responsibility. I always correct my mistakes myself once I know about them. I just mentioned you to correct them as you were in the process of correction. If you don't want to, leave them, I will correct them.
Adamant1 (2022-12-15 10:31:42+00:00): No worries. I wasn't trying to say you don't correct your own mistakes and normally I'd help you fix it, but I'm pretty busy with another project right now. I've fixed plenty of miss tagged stuff around here before here though. 

Not to say your responsible for it, but HOT mappers can make a lot of mistakes sometimes and it can get old  cleaning up after them. A lot of them won't respond to messages either. Let alone will they correct things. So I appreciate that your willing to do both. 

Anyway, happy mapping.
hatul (2022-12-17 18:28:33+00:00): אני מבין שזו אנדרטה, אז צריך לתייג אותה נכון ולכתוב מידע רלוונטי.
maraf24 (2024-03-26 15:49:14+00:00): Wszystkie te odcinki istnieją i stanowią połączenie dla rowerów i wózków.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406502375
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406502378
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406502377
user_8101879 (2022-07-03 12:49:19+00:00): Hi,

the relation 12653994 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards
sorcrosc (2023-01-02 23:12:30+00:00): Questo percorso pedonale è mappato con un limite di velocità di 1 km/ora. È corretto? Ci sono cartelli che lo indicano?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1073784668
Grazie in anticipo
Frans S (2022-06-27 13:15:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.
You overlooked some buildings as well.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122909108
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Niiepce (2022-07-01 15:10:16+00:00): Ich würde hier für die Spielplatzanlagen nicjt place=square verwenden. Ich habe es korrigiert. :)
Endres Pelka (2025-09-18 18:05:05+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours