piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-27 21:54:30+00:00): todas tus ediciones han sido eliminadas. son puntos personales con nombres de personas, no de empresas.
Rainero (2022-07-23 09:29:42+00:00): Hallo StegoStadtführer, ich habe den Teil dieses Änderungssatzes revertiert, in dem der Eingang Schärfengäßchen 2 auf die Gebäudekante zwischen Galeria Kaufhof und dem Gebäude Zeil 112-114 verschoben wurde. Das war sicher ein Unfall beim Editieren.

Viele Grüße,  
Rainer
DaveF (2022-07-23 13:45:58+00:00): Hi
Please don't adjust or split the Cotswold AONB relation. It's location is officially set.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:00:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
eggie (2022-07-22 21:51:25+00:00): Beste Bosuil, maar daarom is het hier toch geen Verboden Toegang  access=no
Combinaties met access=no en andere accesstags zijn bijna altijd fout. 
...
bicycle=yes en foot=yes hoef je niet toe te voegen aan wegen Dat is default. 
Hoe zit het met de toegang voor motorvoertuigen hier?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-22 22:21:26+00:00): Even gespiekt. Het paaltje moet getagd worden als barrier=bollard  Dan zal het niet meer voor motorvoertuigen routeren.
access=no zal ik verwijderen. 
Dat is een bord Verboden Toegang algemeen.

Een paaltje zal ik aanpassen met moped en mofa=yes omdat die er wel langs mogen. De rest is default.
Hier wat info hoe een paaltje te taggen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
MVG
eggie
Bosuil112 (2022-07-23 09:17:56+00:00): Ik heb geprobeerd om het paaltje zo vast te leggen.
Kan ik ook een foto bijvoegen?
Bosuil112 (2022-07-23 09:19:46+00:00): Motor voertuigen kunnen er niet langs. Er staat aan beide zijden en bord dood lopende weg.
eggie (2022-07-23 09:23:57+00:00): Oke... Helaas kun je geen foto's toevoegen.
Wanneer de situatie nog zo is als ik in Straatkijk zie dan hoort het getagd te worden zoals ik het had aangepast

Dit waren je edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123966595

Je hebt nu barrier=bollard verwijderd en zal het niet meer werken in OSM om een motorvoertuig tegen te houden. 
Wanneer het een paaltje is valt het ook niet onder de noemer van traffic_calming. 
...traffic_calming =?  houdt geen auto's tegen.  Dat is bv een hump of een table Zie wiki traffic_calming.

'k Denk dus dat het paaltje weer terug 'moet'. 

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2022-07-23 09:25:34+00:00): Dus.. even om te helpen..
De regel
traffic_calming=yes weg

en weer toevoegen
barrier=bollard

Doe je het zelf?
Bosuil112 (2022-07-23 09:50:10+00:00): Ik zal het proberen.
Bosuil112 (2022-07-23 10:03:04+00:00): Het lukt mij niet.
Bosuil112 (2022-07-23 10:05:15+00:00): In beide bermen staan betonnen duplo  blokken midden in asfalt een ijzeren klap paal. In oktober wordt het asfalt rood.
eggie (2022-07-23 10:13:30+00:00): Je moet in editor iD kiezen na selectie voor "Alle tags zichtbaar". Dan kun je regels toevoegen en/of verwijderen.
Probeer maar.
Ik kijk straks wel.
eggie (2022-07-23 10:14:16+00:00): Lessen iD en JOSM 

https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/
eggie (2022-07-23 11:32:56+00:00): Het paaltje...  nu inklapbaar en de betonblokken heb ik toegevoegd.
No problem.

MVG
eggie
Bosuil112 (2022-07-23 11:43:58+00:00): Bedankt,
Ik ga de handleiding bekijken zodat ik veranderingen die ik tegenkom kan invoeren.
Groeten,
Evert Jan.
mueschel (2022-08-09 10:40:37+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag 'addr:streetr' on this building and another one. Could you check & fix this?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304953594
harg (2022-08-09 14:39:47+00:00): Thanks for the note. I fixed them both,
confusedbuffalo (2022-07-25 11:03:55+00:00): What's happened with the postcode on this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080646373 ?
(Also, it would help other mappers if you could leave more detailed changeset descriptions, possibly also including the source of your data. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments )
Happy mapping!
The Orkney Map (2022-07-25 11:47:24+00:00): Thanks, I have altered the postcode. All addresses are checked with the  Royal Mail listings and with OSG (the Royal Mail takes priority), and with both the current Ordnance Survey map online (via Canmore) and historic 25 inch to the mile maps via the National Library of Scotland. I also use Google Streetview, my own eyes and ears (I live on Orkney) and my partner's knowledge (she reads meters across the County). Street names are checked against the Orkney Islands Council listing. All this means that there are a significant number of AKA's on the Orkney Map - which is necessary for first responders, delivery people etc. This is a lot of information to paste in each time I save changes! I will try a shortened version. (The Orkney Map)
All the best
Mark
woodpeck (2022-07-25 12:42:44+00:00): Dear Mark, sadly all but one of the sources you mentioned are protected by copyright. You cannot use any Royal Maps product, OSG, the Orkney Islands Concil listings or the current OS maps to contribute anything to OpenStreetMap, and anything you have derived from these data sources must be removed again or else OpenStreetMap could be liable to copyright violation claims.

Historic NLS maps are ok to use, and of course personal knowledge and own observations are fine. But anything copied from these other sources must not remain in OSM.

Will you be able to unpick your past contributions and remove what is not allowed for us to have? If you cannot, then unfortunately we would be forced to remove all data that you have contributed. We would very much like to avoid that!

Cheers     
Frederik Ramm (OSMF Data Working Group)
woodpeck (2022-07-25 12:44:42+00:00): oops, I meant to write "Royal Mail" not "Royal Maps".
The Orkney Map (2022-07-25 15:53:47+00:00): Oops. Luckily, I have only used that form of words today. I have re-edited all the various things added today (I hope). 
I can confirm that I have been along these roads in the last couple of weeks and have talked to local people to check house names etc.  In addition, I have visited a number of these places etc. with my partner when she is reading meters. In order to read the meters you need to know where you are going - and this means using all the data services you mentioned (other than the historic OS stuff). Unfortunately, there are often errors in all of these sources hence the need to triangulate. 
The reason I started putting material on OSM is that mobile signals are poor in Orkney and - thus - data sources like OSG and Royal Mail are not available. Those that are - like Google are pretty useless for the granular detail. As the maps are downloadable on OSM this means that people like first responders, delivery people and meter readers can have the data they need on demand. 
All the best
Dr Mark Smith (The Orkney Map)
woodpeck (2022-07-25 17:53:22+00:00): Mark, just to be very clear on this - copyright tops the potential of saving lives for first responders or any other laudable use case you can find. If it comes from Royal Mail, it does not go into OSM full stop, no matter how useful for a first responder or anyone else. We don't copy it, we don't "triangulate", we don't use it at all. We haven't invented these rules but we are going to play by them. Even if it is a data source that *could*, given a mobile phone signal, be used freely in some other app or on some web site - still not something we may add to OSM. And regarding "that form of words", we are not about words, we're about data. If there is any name you have added that does not come from a sign or an out-of-copyright map but instead from a copyrighted source, then you must remove that name again. When push comes to shove, we at OSM must be able to demonstrate that we haven't illegally copied the data, and "I've talked to the locals" may work for a handful of names but becomes strained when it is used as an explanation for hundreds. So please, again, have a think about any data you may have been added from copyrighted sources not only today, but over your course of contributing to OSM, and remove all of it. Please do take this seriously because if doubts remain, OSM must err on the side of caution rather than risk violating copyright.
The Orkney Map (2022-07-25 23:41:29+00:00): Just to be clear on this. I am using Royal Mail postcode finder to check post codes and to see how they spell house names. I am looking for confirmation - it is not my first port of call. After all, I can just click on the map on UK grid reference finder and be given a code. However, there is a duty of care on the part of contributors to OSM - we need to validate the information. Does this breach OSM's interpretation of legitimate use with regard to UK copyright? 

I use OSG in a similar way. In towns and villages, I walk along streets, take pictures, and note numbers and names. You only need to talk to locals in these settings when something isn't obvious. I do one street, estate or small area at a time. I will not map an area or island that I have not been to and spent time in. (There is an exception to this - small remote islands. Here I have asked locals to check the map).

In more remote areas and islands I have driven around and noted details etc. There are only around 8000 properties in Orkney and there are various local individuals who are very knowledgable about their areas. Alongside this, there are plenty of other different locally published sources that help map the areas. Some islands have near complete listings of their properties. 

I have also been helped by local community development trusts and community councils. When I get towards finishing an area I ask them for their comments and corrections. It was one of these trusts that highlighted the problems experienced by first responders. 

I have worked on this project for around two years - and could devote a lot of time to it as I was freshly retired. As you can see, I have had access to a lot of raw and firsthand data. It is a duty of care that largely takes me to OSG, Royal Mail and current OS maps etc. It would be shoddy and irresponsible not to check. 

Mark
LockOnGuy (2022-08-17 23:01:27+00:00): Hi BaghdadiMapper, please take a look of what you did to Corniche Street (W275586601), see the left part of it near Dilal Sq. 
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=123957129     
or:    
https://osmcha.org/changesets/123957129/    
Thank you for your edits but please be careful next time. Regards.
LockOnGuy (2022-08-17 23:20:59+00:00): apparently the other end is dragged too, I'm fixing it now.
BaghdadiMapper (2022-09-19 17:05:59+00:00): Thanks
Dodko (2022-07-23 06:30:58+00:00): Táto budova nemá adresu 185, nemá ešte žiadnu adresu.
185 je číslo parcely.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/806862/185?pos=49.128907,20.856636,19
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
emersonveenstra (2022-07-26 13:39:08+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080649552 isn't tagged right. I don't think there's 3 lanes that go both ways, and `turn:lanes` is not supposed to be an integer. Would you mind fixing it?
michiganguy123 (2022-07-31 20:48:15+00:00): Hi, I've removed that tag and removed the turn lanes tag, I'm not sure how to properly mark a center turn lane
emersonveenstra (2022-08-04 22:43:03+00:00): I did it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124499439, i had to split the way because the center turn lane eventually became a left turn lane, but center turn lanes are just `lanes:both_ways=1` and `turn:lanes:both_ways=left`
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
rayleigh1 (2022-08-26 09:20:12+00:00): Hey there, please don't add non-existent features. Those bus stops were already mapped in correct places. I've reverted your changes.
Belle Haven Mapper (2022-07-23 03:18:08+00:00): The stop-sign is correct, but recently this intersection has changed significantly. There is some additional verbiage that might be useful to capture, but I'm unsure if there is an existing method to do it.

NPS has a diagram and discussion about this intersection.

https://www.nps.gov/gwmp/learn/management/southern-george-washington-memorial-parkway-safety-study-next-steps.htm
Joseph R P (2022-07-23 22:51:48+00:00): I've mapped the redesigned intersection by holding my phone up to the computer, which had an image of the planned design pulled up on the screen, and roughly traced the new slipways and added the new stop signs. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123992324
Belle Haven Mapper (2022-07-25 02:24:56+00:00): Looks great. Thanks for updating the whole intersection and all your contributions.

Hopefully some year the NPS will get the money and we'll get to remap this as a roundabout with a pedestrian bridge.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
maraf24 (2022-07-23 13:43:54+00:00): Już jest przejezdna?
rsoltys (2022-07-23 14:15:33+00:00): Otwarcie 4  sierpnia
https://youtu.be/0eFfKSI5Rgk
maraf24 (2022-07-23 20:46:29+00:00): To skąd ta edycja? Nawigacje OSM już zaczęły prowadzić tędy kierowców.
Allison P (2022-07-27 03:06:19+00:00): addr:city should not be in all caps. Please correct this here and on all your other edits.
Allison P (2022-07-27 03:46:01+00:00): Also, addr:city is supposed to be used for the postal city, not necessarily the city the address is in. So these should be listed as San Pedro, not Los Angeles.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
LockOnGuy (2022-08-15 23:25:45+00:00): Why did you change the name of Al-Hasakah (node 572568688)?        
You changed the 'name' tag from Arabic to Kurdish, while almost no one even the Kurds in this city speaks it.       
The majority of the city are Arabs followed by Assyrians then Armenians then the Kurds which is very very small minority.           
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Hasakah#Demographics
Please don't change this again.
Allison P (2022-07-27 03:29:02+00:00): Please provide a source for El Puerto Restaurant. I can't seem to find any evidence it exists from an online search. I don't see it on street-level imagery either.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:28:43+00:00): I live in the area and the restaurant is opening in the next few days. It is replacing an old restaurant that moved from there. Will a website with my personal pictures work for the description? Or will the tag have to wait until it can be seen in what ever allowed map we can use for verification. I was told we could not use 3rd party platforms like Google Maps or Bing Map.
Allison P (2022-07-27 20:31:29+00:00): Yes, but you should be tagging your changeset with your sources, rather than waiting for questions. It would be great to link to that. Of course 
you cannot copy from other platforms that don't explicitly permit OSM usage. It is copyright infringement.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:42:08+00:00): So I should tag the source as “me I live here”? I am getting very inconsistent messages from mods about what a “source” is. So technically I’m waiting for someone to point these out to see what I did wrong and how I can stay consistent. This whole area I live in was severely under tagged and outdated.
Allison P (2022-07-27 20:53:32+00:00): Yes, "local knowledge" is a very common source tag. It was probably just another user that gave you that info. Every edit has a source. Technically you don't have to tag it, but then people can question you about it. Also, people will not treat "local knowledge" as unquestionable. If other sources seem to make it improbable people will want to verify.

Yes, many businesses are missing. OpenStreetMap is reliant on surprisingly few contributors, at least in the US. It got its start in the UK and is most popular in Germany.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:55:55+00:00): Ok great. Good to know.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
hsc666 (2022-07-23 09:36:17+00:00): Hallo LarryB1234 und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe mir Deine Änderungen angesehen und habe den Eindruck, dass Du hier einige Sachen beschädigt hast bzw. falsch eingetragen hast. Befindet sich der Kodi nicht mehr vor Ort? Du hast daraus einen Verein für karitative und humanitäre Aktivitäten gemacht, der denselben Namen tragen soll wie ein Geschäft, welches sich angeblich um die Ecke befinden soll - allerdings in einer nicht existierenden Hausnummer. Nebenbei hast Du auch eine Bus-Relation beschädigt. Um hier aufzuräumen, verrate mir bitte, was sich hier wo *wirklich* vor Ort befindet!

VG
hsc666
hsc666 (2022-07-30 21:27:12+00:00): Friendly reminder.

Wenn Du Deine Änderungen nicht erklären kannst oder möchtest, werde ich den ursprünglichen Zustand wiederherstellen.
hsc666 (2022-08-04 10:52:36+00:00): CS reverted due to lack of response
gscholz (2022-07-27 05:59:18+00:00): Hi elC0mrade,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-37.50560&lat=-7.61781&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123958744

Can you please fix this? Btw. this is a very typical error if you use ID, you can avoid such errors if you use JOSM.
Kind regards
Guido
hsc666 (2022-08-04 10:53:06+00:00): CS reverted due to lack of response (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123958603)
Joske1020 (2025-11-03 10:47:12+00:00): is #564319192 niet bebost? (zie kaart: https://natuurenbos.be/sites/default/files/2023-07/Kaart_Ryckevelde.pdf)
eggie (2022-07-23 08:29:42+00:00): Hoi Wrt  Prima om zaken toe te voegen, dat drive_through kennen we niet in Nederland.. Wel in de USA.
Daar gaat flappentappen en post veelal met de auto.
Het heeft geen meerwaarde om dit toe te voegen.
Je zou bv wel operator=PostNL kunnen toevoegen. 

Wel concreet commentaar bij je uploads svp.
MVG
eggie
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-07-31 17:29:27+00:00): Hi, I see you've added many bicycle=yes tags. Please use bicycle=designated if it's a bicycle or a combined bicycle/pedestrian path. Keep in mind that cycling on sidewalks and footways is against the law in Estonia and bicycle=yes should not be added to them.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-07-31 17:37:07+00:00): Also I don't see the point of changing highway=path to cycleway on combined bicycle-pedestrian paths. This road is both for pedestrians and cyclists. Most data consumers will treat them the same, but cyclosm will draw them differently. iD editor does prefer highway=cycleway, but it doesn't make it the only correct way.

I don't care much which tagging scheme is used, but I think it's better to keep changes to a minimum.
Perdolique (2022-08-01 12:45:44+00:00): According to wiki the bicycle=designated means there should be a special sign that allows using a bicycle, but there are some places where the sign or mark on the ground doesn't exist, but the road itself is just designed for both types of transport, legs and two wheels (around 2 meters wide) and it widely used by cyclists. But some apps like Komoot or Garmin for some reason are trying to avoid those roads because it's just marked as a footpath without any bicycle allowance. That why I was added bicycle=yes for a few obvious places. I understand that probably the best way is to ask the local government to add some signs or so to allow bicycles officially, but I guess the OSM map should reflex the reality at the first. Btw, I will check today maybe there're signs that I could miss and bicycle=yes might be changed to designated. Just note, the final decision to do that was the navigation improvement to avoid roads when obvious bicycle roads exist and reduce danger. The thing of how it will be visually marked in different app should be the second thing I guess. 🤔
Nakaner (2022-07-27 15:23:11+00:00): Hi,

OSM is a community project. Reviewing other mappers' changeset is an important part of improving OSM. Could you please use descriptive changeset comments when you upload your changes? "updates" does not describe what you change and is likely wrong if your changeset only creates new objects but does not modify any existing objects.

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards

Michael
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
eggie (2022-11-01 11:12:52+00:00): Hoi  

Je pad eindigde op een grens ipv op een pad.

Voorlopig hersteld, maar dat pad loopt dwars door een aantal afrasteringen.
Wellicht weet jij hoe het zit?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-01 11:16:01+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123960297
eggie (2022-11-01 11:25:57+00:00): Ik heb het pad iets verlegd zodat het via de hekdoorgang loopt en uitkomt op de kruising. 
Up to you verder. 

Groet
eggie
Geim (2022-11-01 17:05:58+00:00): Deze track is niet verhard: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432924121#map=19/52.68676/7.01854
Ik heb e.e.a. aangepast
Geim (2022-11-01 17:18:49+00:00): Dit pad bestaat niet. Langs de hele Vossendijk staat aan beide zijden een hek. Wat voor gegevens gebruik je dat je tot deze conclusie komt? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080670196/history#map=17/52.67611/7.01572
Ik heb het gewist.
eggie (2022-11-01 17:24:27+00:00): Het steeds maar weer toevoegen van paden ook wanneer die paden dwars door een woud van hekken lopen en 
die kennelijk te zien zijn op een luchtfoto  geeft schade aan de kaart. Het is nu verschillende malen aan de orde gesteld zonder dat er een reactie terugkomt.

MVG
eggie
❤️‍🔥 (2022-08-01 11:04:38+00:00): Hi, is this newly opened path accessible from the public cycleway, or from the marina, or both?
CarstenHansen (2022-08-02 06:05:31+00:00): Hi Kyle, sorry for the delay. The path is finished and accessible from the marina, but there is a temporary barrier in place that prevents access from the public cycleway.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-08-03 04:59:47+00:00): awesome, thanks for your reply!
felipeeugenio (2022-07-23 22:16:26+00:00): Hola Sergio
Por favor no usar nombres genéricos y menos pegar las canchas a las calles.
saludos
MxxCon (2022-07-24 16:09:03+00:00): How do you find these duplicate nodes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123961134
b-jazz (2022-07-25 03:14:06+00:00): I use OSM Inspector from Geofabrik: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi. I know that KeepRight has a similar feature, but doesn't update as frequently as Geofabrik's QA tools. KeepRight is at https://www.keepright.at.