piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:20:56+00:00): Hello fedc. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523517995 it should be `gauge` instead of `gau`, right? #newkey #typo
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 14:09:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Какой музей вы хотели добавить на карту? Возможно он уже на ней присутствует.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:23:42+00:00): Hello GOwin. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523233221 what's the meaning of `added=a`, `but=areas`, `few=buildings,`, `has=been`? #newkey
GOwin (2017-09-12 01:02:55+00:00): Good catch! Definitely not tags, but it seems that I've inadvertently posted the task comment into the object. 

I'm revising it now. Thanks!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-12 14:04:49+00:00): Hello EzekieIT. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3563806110 you have tagged `addr:supercontinent=The Americas`. First `addr:supercontinent` isn't documented in the wiki. Second `The Americas` isn't in this list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supercontinents 
#newkey
Polarbear-repair (2017-09-15 16:24:18+00:00): After being blocked several times for adding fiction, the user EzekielT focuses on parodistic and in his opinion funny tagging, which however loads the database with nonsense, despite being told several times by the community to stop that.

The addr:* scheme represents the postal address of an object. 

Neither "addr:continent", addr:megalopolis nor addr:supercontinent are parts of postal addresses. Since the continent of an object can be derived in a geo-database as OSM, such tagging is unnecessary and spam. 

Finally, the review website 'yelp' is not a means of contact to the operation, i.e. contact:yelp:website is wrong. The tagging is not meant to be a link collection.
Geography Canada (2017-09-15 17:26:04+00:00): That is totally wrong, don't believe him. Stop following me, Polarbear! Leave me ALONE!
Geography Canada (2017-09-15 17:33:50+00:00): Your comments on the yelp tagging are dubiously important, at best. I never added fiction to OSM, you're speaking of an issue already dealt with over a year ago. I'm not using funny tagging! You're just trying to find ways to disapprove of me, and I've shown multiple signs that I don't want your attention. Please do NOT answer this comment!
Polarbear-repair (2017-09-15 17:41:22+00:00): Edits in OSM are peer-reviewed. 
Stop making personal allegations.
Polarbear-repair (2017-09-15 19:05:56+00:00): Repaired.
Geography Canada (2017-09-15 19:14:18+00:00): You were the first one making personal allegations, by insisting that I think my tagging is "funny", and that I focus on making "parodistic" (a world you seem to LOVE using all the time) contributions, even though I never said nor implied it (and it isn't true, it's a false statement). And also by believing that I added fiction, even though it was a misunderstanding (I was sourcing from Google and Wikipedia because no one had told me we weren't allowed to source from them). Also, I'm not the first one to use the key addr:continent, it's been used 252 times by 32 different users: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr:continent. And the fact that you're only picking on my edits seals my "allegations" as true (even though your comments are based on tiny things that no one commented on, and are not deemed important at all). And yes, edits on OSM may be "peer reviewed" but not as intensively as you are, raising "issues" that no one else thinks nor cares about (such as displaying sidewalk=both and individual footpaths beside). Besides, the way you talk doesn't sound "peer reviewed". Sounds more like "enemy reviewed", attacking me with negative comments that have nothing to do with the actual changeset (such as calling my contributions "parodistic" and "nonsense"). If you'd approached your complaints nicely, then you'd get a friendly comment back. But you've been aggressively mean since the beginning, showing no signs of friendliness at all to me. For example, you never use the word "please", and you keep calling my contributions "nonsense" and "parodistic" over and over again. It works like this: you treat me nice, I treat you nice, I treat you nice, you treat me nice. Don't just make a mean comment and expect a nice comment back. Just try to think how to explain my mistakes in a more friendly way, like most other contributors do :). Don't make allegations of what you think I'm doing without asking, it's better to ask me what I'm actually doing first.
eggie (2017-09-11 07:29:55+00:00): Oke  :)
Hjart (2017-10-12 10:31:09+00:00): Jeg har slettet nogle wiki tags på Køge Bugt-banen idet de i forvejen var angivet på  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7073835 Se også https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Link_Improvement_Project#Duplicate_tags_on_a_relation_and_its_members
mikkolukas (2017-10-13 22:26:42+00:00): Fino fino, ikke nogle jeg har haft noget med at gøre. Så længe lysten er der, er jeg i gang med at tjekke op på hele s-banen. har indtil videre bearbejdet strækningen fra Frederikssund til København H. Pt. sidder jeg og arbejder i kulissen med en overordnet refresh for København H
Hjart (2017-10-13 22:36:53+00:00): Det ser bare ud som om at det var dig der tilføjede dem her for en måneds tid siden:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46151248/history
mikkolukas (2017-10-15 22:26:22+00:00): Ahja, men blot fordi vi krydser ind over Frederikssundbanen. Så vidt jeg husker blot positionering af nodes og rettlese af 'voltage' så vidt jeg husker :)
mikkolukas (2017-10-15 22:27:40+00:00): Fredeikssundbanen/Vestbanen/Høje Taastrup-banen
naoliv (2019-01-19 20:55:46+00:00): Alemenezes, de onde você obteve os vários nomes de ruas que você inseriu no mapa, por favor?
Alemenezes (2019-01-20 16:10:54+00:00): Nas placas locais, tenho casa na R. Dr. Rubem Marcus Rocha, por que?
CloCkWeRX (2017-09-11 04:39:35+00:00): Landuse=residential is more appropriate, I've fixed this now
user_5359 (2017-09-11 17:40:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your area.
Владимир К (2019-03-31 09:43:05+00:00): Добрый день.
зачем вы изменили названия?
Владимир К (2019-03-31 09:44:45+00:00): откатываю полностью
nevw (2017-09-11 05:32:17+00:00): Would you care to elaborate why you deleted the poi with comment "delete useless Poi"
I don't see any sign that you are improving the map with updated or improved mapping for the area.
CloCkWeRX (2017-09-11 06:19:39+00:00): It seems like this should definitely be reverted; some of those appear to be useful internal POI.
nevw (2017-09-13 10:17:48+00:00): no response - reverted mass deletion of poi
marc__marc (2021-03-12 10:44:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5096742721
it's a diplomatic embassy or a private compagny ?
DP24PH (2020-10-10 02:55:57+00:00): Hello, Schadow1 Expeditions! This also solved the note 824278 from our local contributor (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/824278).


DP24
daganzdaanda (2017-09-12 16:09:37+00:00): Hi Tubk86, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I think that you want to add good information, but the way that you are doing this right now is not useful for anybody. 
Please read the wiki to check if you are using the tags correctly: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

For example, here is the description of the "addr:*" keys: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
So, please don't use addr:housename=a and addr:place=a.

More infos for starters: http://learnosm.org/en/

If you have any questions, please ask, OSM-Mappers are a friendly bunch! 
https://help.openstreetmap.org/
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/index.php
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-11-04 09:57:32+00:00): What is the meaning of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5096853069 ? Are there really so many houses in https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/10.82877/106.77815 region named "a" on street "a"?
user_5359 (2017-09-11 17:26:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
lleung (2017-09-13 15:48:10+00:00): 欢迎！
这次修改有几个问题：
1. 白云堡是属于居住区吧？为什么要将landuse=residential删除呢？
2. 请不要添加对别人无意义的信息（“黑客他家”）
n_near (2017-09-14 06:53:58+00:00): 1.没印象了，可能我不小心点错了吧
2.开个玩笑开个玩笑
n_near (2017-09-14 07:02:19+00:00): 不好意思
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-06-21 13:23:21+00:00): What is the meaning of information=duong22-tangnhonphu-1109 tag?
Владимир К (2017-09-13 06:36:53+00:00): кто такая воображуля?
Alexander-II (2017-09-13 17:36:11+00:00): Она почему-то из дома вышла. У нее в адресе дом № 100, а он чуть в стороне уже отрисован.
Владимир К (2017-09-14 06:52:04+00:00): автор как обычно игнорит. удаляю.
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:09:21+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2017-09-11 17:23:25+00:00): Weclome to OSM! I idn’t believe that "20765 Old Barn Trail, Interlochen, MI 49643“ is the name of the building. Can you please use addr:housenumner, addr:street, addr:state, addr:postcode instead?
Supaplex (2017-09-16 02:36:30+00:00): 公車關係裡，stop沒加role
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 15:34:34+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap.  
Пройду немого по ошибкам, которые вы сделали:
1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85660544/history Здесь вы указали в наименовании, что это магазин. Что неверно. Для указания, что это магазин существует тег shop=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:shop нужно выбрать подходящее значение. Поле name=* же используется только для имен собственных (названий), но не для описаний. В проекте осм объекты описываются через соответствующие теги. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
2) Иногда вы добавляете точки на полигон зданий, которые не изменяют при этом его формы и не содержат тегов. Например https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5097013714/history и https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5097013715/history
3) Точку с аптекой вы перетащили из здания куда-то во двор https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2159976344/history
4) С некоторых школ и детских садов вы удалил теги, что это школы и детские сады. При этом территории вокруг зданий не были обозначены школой/садом. А значит информация об наличии учебного заведения просто исчезла https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29008974/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29019273/history
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 15:39:38+00:00): Наглядно увидеть сделанные вами изменения можно по ссылкам: 1) https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=51927924 2) https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#51927924
user_5359 (2017-09-11 17:12:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
SHARCRASH (2017-09-11 11:09:07+00:00): Hello! This is very unlikely a way only being a cycleway. What about the access to the farm on the East side of that way... certainly not ONLY by bicycle! Logic! :) Allowed access for a certain type of mobility does not make the way necessarily that type of way. There are many access signs on the road CR103 with access restricted to vehicles except bicyles but that doesn't make all of them cycleways. The way you edited is mainly an unmaintained but solid small road (track grade1) for agricultural purposes. On the West side the signs even designate it as allowed to agricultural vehicles and rollerskaters. Before doing any edit you should make sure how the different elements have to be tagged according OSM's general agreement via the Wiki.
SHARCRASH (2017-10-03 05:24:31+00:00): You don't give a damn... right... I'll keep that in mind.
mgpx (2017-09-11 08:06:55+00:00): Szia,
ebben a módosításcsomagban a tájékoztató táblák nevét egy külső weblapra hivatkozva (source) írtad át. Kérlek vedd figyelembe, hogy külső forrás, beleértve a weblapokat is, csak akkor használható fel OSM célokra, ha ahhoz a jogtulajdonos írásban hozzájárult. Ellenkező esetben a felhasználás jogsértő lehet. Ha saját felmérésből származnak az adatok, az rendben van, akkor viszont a source mező maradjon "survey".
user_5359 (2017-09-11 16:22:06+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!  Es wäre schön, wenn Du noch die Namen der beiden Straßen ergänzen könntest. Und die Wellnessoase darf ruhig mit shop=beauty (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Sch.C3.B6nheitssalon) gekennzeichnet sein.
DK7080BE (2017-09-11 07:47:59+00:00): Linker du ikke til en eShop (resenbro-by.dk) ?
Hjart (2017-09-11 08:06:27+00:00): Hmm, jo.. Jeg overførte blot linket fra en eksisterende bynode og troede den var i orden. Sletter nu
eggie (2017-09-11 09:15:16+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
literan (2017-09-11 17:23:02+00:00): Добрый день. Почитайте, пожалуйста, о правилах использования тега name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.9D.D0.B5_.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.B4.D1.85.D0.BE.D0.B4.D0.B8.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.BA_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F.D0.BC_.D1.84.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.BC.D0.B0.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BD.D0.BE (не у каждого магазина есть название)
eggie (2017-09-11 08:06:53+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-11 08:10:06+00:00): Wanneer je het groen aanpast aan je survey of de laatste luchtfoto dan kun je de source=3dshapes veranderen in survey of kadaster pdok 2016. 3dshapes klopt dan niet meer.
eggie (2017-09-11 08:13:49+00:00): Hier geef je de paden een betere positie. Pas dan het commentaar aan zodat een andere mapper het begrijpt. Alles is lastig in het begin.
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
In het begin volgen we je edits om te helpen.
eggie (2017-09-11 08:15:05+00:00): Let even op dat de BING 2017 in Nederland er naast ligt. De kadaster pdok 2016 ligt wel goed.
R0bst3r (2017-09-12 13:34:28+00:00): Hallo Hugo Gold,
willkommen bei OSM.
Hier lief sehr viel schief. Bitte keine vorhandenen Punkte wiederverwenden, der Addresspunkt war wichtig, deshalb habe ich ihn manuell wiederhergestellt. Zudem hast du den Firmeneintrag ans Gebäude geklebt und verschoben, so dass das Gebäude mehrere nicht vorhandene Ecken hatte. Um einen Revert zu verhindern und deinen Eintrag zu retten, habe ich dies manuell korrigiert. 
Bitte Vorsicht bei zukünftigen Änderungen!
Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-11 08:21:32+00:00): Gdybyś miał uwagi czy pomysł jak zmodyfikować stronę z raportami by przerabianie było prostsze to daj znać :)
wmyrda (2017-09-11 08:24:35+00:00): Trudne to nie jest, ale dobrze by było jak by strona była generowana automatycznie i linki odnawiały się same. Początkowo gdy jest wiele do poprawiania powiedzmy co godzinę. Jak już się przez to przebrnie to i raz na tydzień wystarczy.
wmyrda (2017-09-11 08:26:02+00:00): w sensie obecnie pewnie jakieś 80% obiektów albo i więcej z grupy "OSM element with broken tag that should be fixed" już poprawiłem, a do pobrania i tak jest nadal każdy z nich.
wmyrda (2017-09-11 16:33:48+00:00): @Mateusz
W zasadzie to wydaje się że zakończyłem te najważniejsze grupy. Jak rozumiem pozostałe może ogarnąć skrypt tak?
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-13 08:00:12+00:00): Super! Jeszcze trochę przypadków zostało (w tym trochę takich które były do tej pory niezgłaszane, np brakujące relacje rzek).

Nowa wersja jest jak zwykle na https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Polska.html

Dodałem sprytniejsze zapytania - jeśli problem został poprawiony przez edycję OSM to obiekt nie powinien się pojawiać po poprawieniu.

Do tej pory gdy node 123 miał błędne wikidata Q42 to zapytanie było takie:

node(123);

i node 123 się zawsze pojawiał, również po poprawie

teraz jest takie:

node(123)['wikidata'='Q42'];

więc gdy wikidata zostało zmienione to przestanie się pojawiać (nie natychmiast, overpass ma opóźnienie - typowo rzędu kilku minut).

Miałem pomysł na poprawę wydajności by aktualizacja była częściej niż raz na kilka dni, ale wymaga to jeszcze dodatkowych modyfikacji.

W tym momencie zadania dla botów przestały się pojawiać i są ukryte.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-13 08:01:37+00:00): A, gdyby sprytniejsze zapytania nie były sprytne bo pojawiają się również po edycji - daj znać.

Tak samo gdybyś trafił na jakieś błędy lub miał pomysł na poprawki.
eggie (2017-09-11 09:04:55+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-11 09:08:39+00:00): Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je toevoegt.
guidoknoop (2017-09-11 10:20:38+00:00): Duidelijk, bedankt!
guidoknoop (2017-09-11 10:21:19+00:00): Grasveld toegevoegd
eggie (2017-09-11 10:31:48+00:00): Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
buy_osmand (2025-07-02 11:40:37+00:00): peace [Jay May](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jay%20May), there is a validation warning raised of "Tourism node attached to highway", i will only be able to proceed with my edits only when this is resolved.. i am choosing not to ignore any validation errors,  may i have your assistance in this? Terima kasih!

It's these 4 nodes,
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5097279852
2.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5097279853
3.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5097279855
4.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5097279856


right on the 
 Johor–Singapore Causeway, Woodlands
https://osmand.net/map?pin=1.4526275,103.76926#17/1.4508/103.7715
Jay May (2025-07-02 12:06:36+00:00): Hello. You are asking me about edits from 8 years ago ... and next 5 years ago, when I visited Singapore and Malaysia for the 1st time in 23 years ;) .... what exactly are you expecting from me?
ZZ29 (2017-09-11 17:21:36+00:00): Hi,
Did you deliberately removed this primary road (From Dinajpur to Fulbari)? This road does not exist anymore? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523214097/history
Ataur Rahman Shaheen (2017-09-11 17:52:14+00:00): Yes, there was overlapping road.
ZZ29 (2017-09-11 18:13:51+00:00): I'm not sure I understand. You removed a big part of the "R 585" road (just zoom to see a big "gap"), the road is closed?
Ataur Rahman Shaheen (2017-09-11 18:44:41+00:00): Unfortunately there was some problem with my JOSM application. When i zoom the area it did not show any gap. I uninstall my JOSM and then reinstall it and now it shows a big gap in the road. 
Now i fixed the gap.Sorry for my mistake and thanks a lot to you for pointing it.
BeKri (2017-09-12 12:38:19+00:00): Hüstel ....
2* 39;39a ... Nummernsprung ?
Adresse auf Hausecke
addr:city=5
Gruss derBeKri
didimosi (2017-09-12 17:04:52+00:00): Hallo, ist berichtigt.
Gruß Dieter
4004 (2017-09-14 10:51:00+00:00): fixed
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 12:47:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем вы в addr:city=* указали район города? Более того, в РФ действует упрощенная схема адресации, внутри полигона города указывать adrr:city=* не требуется
Поправьте, пожалуйста, за собой.
eggie (2017-09-11 10:19:40+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd. Changeset reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51931672
Mapper was zich niet bewust dat edits op de kaart kwamen.
eggie (2017-09-11 10:31:03+00:00): Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-12 14:00:20+00:00): Hello Gogla. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523644108 you have tagged `building:=yes`. Is it duplicate of `building=yes` or did you missed some information, e.g. `building:part.....`? #newkey
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 13:12:47+00:00): Вот здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523643085 указали номер дома в неверном формате. Правильно было бы addr:housenumber=1/8 c22 Подробнее можно прочитать в статье https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr#.D0.A2.D0.B5.D0.B3.D0.B8_.D0.B4.D0.BB.D1.8F_.D0.BE.D1.82.D0.B4.D0.B5.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BD.D1.8B.D1.85_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BC.D0.BE.D0.B2
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 13:13:18+00:00): То есть между номером и строением должен быть пробел.
gendy54 (2019-09-23 20:20:04+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour les ajouts. Attention à ne pas supprimer le tag building=yes ;) Je viens de les remettre.
Par ailleurs, rajouter la ville et le CP sur chaque objet ne sert à rien puisque chaque objet est déjà contenu dans une relation "commune" qui contient le nom et le CP.

Bonne continuation.
Alexander-II (2017-09-11 12:48:41+00:00): Аналогично и в этом пакете правок. "addr:city=Басманный" район не нужен.
eggie (2017-09-11 10:20:55+00:00): reverted.. geen prullenbakken maar aangewezen plekken voor vuilophaaldienst.
Wellicht staat er iets in de wifi of weet iemand op het forum het.
eggie (2017-09-11 10:21:37+00:00): wiki bedoel ik uiteraard.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features
literan (2017-09-11 12:30:38+00:00): приветствую. В тегах семейства name должны быть только названия, имена собственные, а не родовые определения, задаваемые тегами вроде "кофейня" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE В связи с этим вашу правку мне придется откатить
R0bst3r (2017-09-12 13:26:46+00:00): Hallo Gustav Hartung GmbH,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deinem Eintrag noch ein craft=plumber für Heizung- und Sanitär hinzugefügt, damit er auf der Karte sichtbar wird. Ein Node sollte immer ein Haupttag bekommen. Eventuell ist ein office oder shop Tag noch sinnvoll?
Viele Grüße
eggie (2017-09-11 09:41:15+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd. Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je edits inhouden svp.
eggie (2017-09-11 09:43:07+00:00): Niet de name=Brandgang  taggen svp. haal je het zelf weg?
eggie (2017-09-11 09:44:13+00:00): footway=sidewalk is een vervelende bug in editor iD. Graag weghalen. Er loopt imemmers geen trottoir aan weerszijde van de brandgang.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 10:44:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5097262022/history - what you mean by fixme=yes here?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-03 10:44:15+00:00): see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4691391
eggie (2017-09-11 09:46:29+00:00): sidewalk verwijderen svp.
RicoElectrico (2021-01-11 13:04:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2493893
eggie (2017-09-11 09:45:40+00:00): Graag concreet aangeven wat je edits inhouden. Aanvulling is niet duidelijk.
Dus: parkeerplaats ingetekend oid.
daganzdaanda (2017-09-12 16:11:43+00:00): Hi sax852, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I think that you want to add good information, but the way that you are doing this right now is not useful for anybody. 
Please read the wiki to check if you are using the tags correctly: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

For example, here is the description of the "addr:*" keys: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
So, please don't use addr:housename=a and addr:street=a. Just leave these values empty if you don't know them.

More infos for starters: http://learnosm.org/en/

If you have any questions, please ask, OSM-Mappers are a friendly bunch! 
https://help.openstreetmap.org/
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/index.php
eggie (2017-09-11 10:18:09+00:00): sidewalk graag verwijderen van footway.
aharvey (2017-09-11 23:58:40+00:00): You should only use one name in the name key.

You could use the alt_name key for an alternate name.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
eggie (2017-09-11 10:10:52+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd. Wat bedoel je met eigen omgeving?
eggie (2017-09-11 10:15:55+00:00): Commentaar kan bv zijn reshape forest. ..
Pas ook de source=      aan als je de 3dshapes veranderd. source=pdok luchtfoto 2016 od survey oid.
R0bst3r (2017-09-12 13:20:30+00:00): Hallo Fiddi,
willkommen bei OSM.
Bitte keine überlappenden Wege einzeichnen wo bereits ein Weg vorhanden ist. Ich habe den Fußweg aufgesplittet und den doppelten Abschnitt entfernt.
Viele Grüße