piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_11418917 (2021-09-27 18:52:51+00:00): Dear Andy,         
Please read what I wrote in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111668407             
Can we please discuss this in one changeset so it's easier to others to follow-up? you pick the way if you want to continue this discussion.         
Regards.
literan (2021-09-25 11:55:40+00:00): задублировали тег детского сада (стоял на территории, вы поставили еще и на здание), плюс зачем-то снесли тег здания со здания.
Frans S (2021-09-25 08:36:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square all  the rectangular buildings.
A White spot means mostley the reflextion of the sun in a metal clad roof. Just map it as a rectangular building


FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111670438
opendcc (2021-09-25 05:05:39+00:00): Werter Herr Paletti, dieser Changeset wurde reverted. Grund: wie schon mehrmals erklärt: nicht einfach Daten löschen, sondern in neue Relationen übernehmen. Leider war da bisher nichts konstruktives von Ihnen hier zu sehen. Ich habe mittlerweile den Teil Alzweg aus dieser (wieder restaurierten) Relation übernommen. Weitere Abschnitte kann ich (oder jemand anders) machen - wenn er/sie/es dafür Zeit hat. Das geht aber nicht, wenn die Daten _vorher_ gelöscht werden. Ist das so schwer zu kapieren??
Frans S (2021-09-25 08:37:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111670475
Frans S (2021-09-25 08:34:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the buildings you map.
Do not oversize a building.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111670508
mariotomo (2021-09-25 02:03:00+00:00): hola. thank you for helping OSM in Panama. please be just a bit more verbose with your changeset comment? like verb/object/details?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111670675
mariotomo (2021-09-25 02:04:11+00:00): "completed the tag for metropolitan railway platforms" ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111670675
kornad (2021-09-25 06:17:12+00:00): Cześć,
Jak już zmieniasz kategorię danego ciągu drogi to rób to dokładnie. W ciągu całej trasy, którą zmieniłeś zostawiłeś kilka odcinków dróg z poprzednią kategorią.
czebureks (2021-09-25 18:57:38+00:00): Cześć,
dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi, poprawiłem.
edfungus (2021-09-25 01:51:44+00:00): *west not east. oops
John Hawkinson (2021-09-25 02:00:12+00:00): err, actually 15 Wedgwood. Typo in the description, data is correct, sorry! I am new to this.
Frans S (2021-09-25 08:32:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the buildings
A clear white spot is often the reflection of a metal clad roof. Map it as a rectangular building.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111671474
Frans S (2021-09-25 08:31:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the buildings you map.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111671537
KingKull2112 (2021-09-25 02:57:55+00:00): Thank you
MxxCon (2021-09-25 03:01:06+00:00): 👍🙂
Frans S (2021-09-25 08:30:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Do not include yards into a mapping. Square each rectangular building.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111671657
aweech (2021-09-25 20:54:18+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edits, as you requested. What you did looks great. At one point you asked whether addresses go on garages, and your decision was correct; addresses do not go on garages when they're a separate building from the main house. Let me know if you have any further questions.

Happy mapping!
WoodWoseWulf (2021-09-25 20:22:08+00:00): Hi madiener,

Welcome to OSM.

You changed this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214635080/history house to a park, so I changed it back for you.

Best,

Wood
catdreamer (2021-10-03 12:28:54+00:00): 請勿用tourism=viewpoint標示路徑里程碑
Frans S (2021-09-27 12:41:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111673016
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:43:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
user_1566574 (2021-09-30 12:38:41+00:00): Attention à ne pas supprimer ce que l'on ne connaît pas, ici un objet enregistré dans la base Mérimée et mis à disposition par le Ministère de la Culture 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/4422268889

Je me charge de le restaurer, zen ;)
2p2m (2021-10-01 07:09:22+00:00): Merci !
Sur ce coup-là, j'ai longuement hésité, mais je ne vois vraiment pas ce que c'est, surtout planté à cet endroit...
Глеб (2021-10-30 09:11:33+00:00): you've broken oneway street
Obsi (2021-09-26 17:20:19+00:00): Onko wikissä virhe tai epäselvyys? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type=changing_rooms
cimzy (2021-09-27 04:45:57+00:00): Nähtävästi ovatkin laavuja. Hölmöä vaan piirtää karttaan 6 laavunkuvaa, kun  ne ei sellaisia ole. Tuota en löytänyt kun yritin kaivaa wikiä. Muutetaan takaisin laavuiksi :)
Obsi (2021-09-28 08:27:17+00:00): Tämä kai virallinen laavu tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type=lean_to
Jospa nuo kuvakkeet joskus muuttuisivat paremmiksi.
cimzy (2021-09-28 09:39:23+00:00): Jep, kartassa kaikki shelterit vaan on samanlaisia :/ viisaampi nyt tuon wikin käytössäkin, löytyyhän sieltä kun yrittää
seewäldler (2021-09-26 08:36:51+00:00): Hallo simson166
zumindest von Seewaldseite hat dieser Weg kein blaues Fußwegzeichen, steht von der B30 aus eines? Wahrscheinlich wäre eher eine Anpassung des tracktypes nach 4 oder 5 für einen track passender?
simson166 (2021-09-26 10:13:14+00:00): Hallo Seewälder,
ich war soeben nochmal Vorort. Von der B30 ist der weg mit Verkehrszeichen 260 (Verbot für Krafträder) verseht. Ab der häste des Weges (Koord 47.66334/9.51014) nicht mehr zugänglich (Umgestürzte Bäume und Bewuchs). Ich denke deshalb, dass sogar Tracktype 5 auch nicht angewendet werden kann.
simson166 (2021-09-26 10:15:03+00:00): Ups! soll heißen: Ab der hälfte des Weges...
seewäldler (2021-09-26 13:39:41+00:00): Hallo simson166 
Den Weg selber bin ich schon länger nicht mehr gelaufen, ich kenn nur den Blick hinein von dem Weg aus, der dann im Zirbelweg endet. Dann sollte aber trotzdem eine Kombination aus track, tracktype und eventuell noch smoothness und trail_visibility zusammem mit track besser passen als ein footway, weil der Weg ja gerade nicht mit Zeichen 239 als reiner Fußweg ausgeschildert ist.
simson166 (2021-09-29 15:24:31+00:00): Hallo Seewälder,
unter Berücksichtigung der Maping Vorgaben laut OSM-Wiki und trotz der Beschilderung (Straßenseite). Sollt hier folgen Eintragungen angewendet werden:
-	highway: path (statt highway: footway oder track (weniger als 2m breit).
-	Smoothness: impassable (Keine bereiften Fahrzeuge).
Wäre es für dich in Ordnung?
Grüße
SekeRob (2021-09-25 06:55:13+00:00): source:name too and onewway=no tags gone. 2 lane default IS bi-directional.
eggie (2021-09-25 07:26:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Noobiemapper (2021-12-23 17:22:08+00:00): Hi there, can you provide a source for changing the name of the cemetery?

Thanks!
Noobiemapper (2021-12-23 17:23:06+00:00): Apologies - it appears the node name was incorrect, but the area name was correct; I will update the name of the area.
Ltrlg (2021-09-25 07:40:31+00:00): source += Cadastre
fabiotofy (2021-09-28 06:07:44+00:00): grazie per la modifica e benvenuto. Riesci però a cambiare il nome anche nel primo piccolo tratto della via? E' un segmento a parte, che quindi va rinominato anch'esso con altro opportuno edit. Grazie. Via Luigi Romagnoli (way number: 246838751)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111676380
fndoder (2021-09-25 22:13:08+00:00): Просьба писать комментарии к пакетам правок, так как иначе другим участникам проекта сложно понять, что именно поменялось.
Frans S (2021-09-25 08:26:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please be more accurate. You map also outside the buildings and include yards or auxillary buildings.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111677024
6b6279 (2021-09-25 08:17:26+00:00): Should've probably linked their homepage as a source

https://suevia-ka.de
TimeVod (2021-09-25 08:30:15+00:00): Hi Lee,
did you know that you may straighten buildings by pressing the key Q? Currently they are very imprecise.
Robert Whittaker (2022-07-17 07:01:05+00:00): This changeset was created by the StreetComplete app. It says you were doing the AddOpeningHours quest, but rather than add any opening hours, the edit has removed the amenity=restaurant, name=Giggling Squid, and other tags from the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/289136763/history . Presumably, you said in the app that the place was permanently closed / no longer existed.

Looking at https://www.gigglingsquid.com/restaurant/bury-st-edmunds/ and https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/1113999 it seems that the Giggling Squid restaurant may still be operating. So I'm wondering if were those tags removed by mistake? Do you know if the restaurant is still there?
tsekhmister_k (2021-09-25 08:50:38+00:00): Отрисованы реки Ченчерь и Морковичи в Казанском районе Тюменской области согласно спутниковым снимкам и топографическим планам (http://retromap.ru/). Согласно топопланам, на большей протяженности эти реки являются пересыхающими, кроме участков, перекрытых дамбами вблизи населенных пунктов. Реки занесены в ГВР и ГКГН.
Прошу проверить правильность отрисовки пересыхающих участков и разливов вблизи поселков.
mavl (2021-09-26 15:52:05+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
  
    > Прошу проверить правильность отрисовки пересыхающих участков и разливов вблизи поселков.  
  
Я посмотрел этот пакет правок. Если под правильностью отрисовки понимать выбор тегов, то теги использованы правильные.  
  
Только тег intermittent=no можно не указывать. Это значение по умолчанию. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent  
  
Если под правильностью отрисовки понимать точное отображение местности на карте, то не знаю.  
  
    > согласно спутниковым снимкам
  
Спутниковые снимки можно использовать.  
  
    > согласно ... и топографическим планам (http://retromap.ru/).
  
Другие карты использовать нельзя. Можно, только если есть специальное разрешение для уточнения OpenStreetMap или лицензия на карту совместима с OpenStreetMap.  

Я зашёл на сайт http://retromap.ru  
Не нашёл на нём ни лицензии, ни условий использования. Это означает, что этот сайт нельзя использовать. Подробнее:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:FAQ
PT-53 (2021-09-26 08:43:18+00:00): Hallo Fyodor Shevchenko,
Du hast an diesem Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406738487/history
die Merkmale
- building:levels=1
- roof:levels=2
ergänzt.
Hast Du da schon das richtige Gebäude ausgewählt?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2021-10-10 10:30:27+00:00): Hallo Fyodor Shevchenko, 
schaust Di Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Glassman (2021-09-25 10:56:22+00:00): Normally you don't see a highway=unclassified between two tracks. If you didn't know, the term comes from the UK, where OSM started and basically means a rural residential road. This doesn't look like it fits. Can you review this edit?
ejain (2021-09-26 09:56:41+00:00): Should it be highway=track? But that shows as "unmaintained track road" in iD, which doesn't seem quite right as this road, while a bit rough, is a maintained road...
Glassman (2021-09-26 18:15:11+00:00): The sections of Thornton Lakes Road from Hwy 20 to your section are tagged as track which implies that it's only suitable for 4WD vehicles. My guess is that it all should be labeled as unclassified if you believe a passenger car could safely use it to get to the trail head.
ejain (2021-09-27 05:40:59+00:00): "suitable" = "most passenger cars can make it to the trailhead (with a bit of care)", or "any passenger car can make it"?
Glassman (2021-09-27 22:04:52+00:00): NPS seems to show it as a road ending about where you show the parking lot. See https://www.nps.gov/noca/planyourvisit/maps.htm. I'd go with unclassified. BTW NPS has open data at https://irma.nps.gov/Portal/. You might get some good info there.
ejain (2021-09-28 08:54:13+00:00): I just made the entire length of the road "unclassified". Hadn't realized that this road was split into several parts when I updated the road ending at the trailhead. Glad that someone is paying attention!
EneaSuper (2021-10-13 12:19:37+00:00): Ciao, credo sia il caso di creare multipoligoni, data la presenza di edifici e campi sportivi.
Tomas Straupis (2021-09-25 12:00:21+00:00): Labas. Dviračių takus atskirais keliais pridedame tada, kai jie yra fiziškai atskirti nuo automobilių kelio - gal tvorele, gal bent metru žolės. Dar vienas dalykas - vietose, kur dviračių takas kerta gatvę - būtinai turi būti bendras taškas (priklausantis ir dvirtakiui, ir gatvei).
Tomas Straupis (2021-09-25 12:07:37+00:00): Atsargiau su pakeitimais, nereikia skubėti. Šitam pakeitime vien neteisingi keitimai - nuo tako nuimta highway žyma, ant pievos ribos uždėta traffic_bumb žyma. Pakeitimą atšaukiau pilnai.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
SomeoneElse (2021-12-18 10:56:14+00:00): Hello 1Jude Babalola and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
If something doesn't have a name, or you don't know what it is, you don't need to create one.  I'm guessing that you don't know what the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986884077 actually is?
Best Regards,
Andy
osmviborg (2021-09-25 10:55:58+00:00): Hvis navnet ikke er officielt, så brug gerne tagget 'loc_name=*' https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
abakus_uploader (2021-09-25 22:32:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Mastrick_Mapper (2021-09-25 16:15:22+00:00): Changeset Comment: Wellgrove Road alignment.
RicoElectrico (2021-12-07 15:07:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2961848
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 12:28:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840814045/history has roof:type = gabled that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:18:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
Buraddo (2021-09-25 11:35:20+00:00): Hello,
What do the points you have added represent?
Please do not add personal markers to the map, those edits are public and points should have meaning for the map.
maro21 (2021-09-29 15:15:39+00:00): Tu już Wrocław ;)
kocio (2021-09-29 17:29:36+00:00): No wiem, zorientowałem się za chwilę i reszta już powinna być dobrze. :-)
₩arren (2021-09-26 23:12:34+00:00): Pavement goes over train tracks with Wellington Street south bridge, Does not intersect train tracks at all.
Константин Гам (2021-10-15 16:32:13+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Пожалуйста внимательней при добавлении данных, вы добавили дубли. Давно уже существуют в OSM: Окей в Купчино и Пятёрочка на Гашека.
Tom Chups (2021-10-15 17:43:10+00:00): Прошу прощения, ошибся. Буду внимательнее проверять. Спасибо что исправили.
kubahahaha (2021-09-30 23:52:35+00:00): Dlaczego błędnych? Artykuł na Wikipedii opisuje dokładnie ten budynek
pk jakub (2021-10-01 04:15:04+00:00): Kościół był podpisany jako cerkiew, mimo iż jest to kościół katolicki. Artykuł na Wikipedii dotyczy świątyni, ale położonej w drugiej Malawie na Podkarpaciu.
kubahahaha (2021-10-01 09:15:54+00:00): Faktycznie. Usunąłem w takim razie jeszcze raz, bo w międzyczasie bot dodał ponownie (usunąłeś link do Wikipedii, ale nie do Wikidata), już powinno być ok.
A67-A67 (2021-09-29 22:22:22+00:00): This changeset overwrites the correct network name 'West-Brabant' to 'Arriva'. Arriva is the operator, not the network. I've reverted this incorrect change.
Frans S (2021-09-27 14:08:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A request.
Please do not connect buildings together with their nodes. Assume all buildings are reparated,
Best regards.
osmviborg (2021-09-25 13:03:31+00:00): Her går du noget ud over hvad der er meningen med description tagget: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Ib36372 (2021-09-25 13:35:13+00:00): Hej,
Beklager hvis jeg har foretaget andre ændringer end “name= Præstegårdsheden” fra “name=Kongerslev Hede”. 

Oplysning hentet fra: https://denstoredanske.lex.dk/Pr%C3%A6steg%C3%A5rdsheden
Og fra informationstavlen ved indgangen til heden.
b-holdet (2021-09-25 17:43:58+00:00): Jeg kan se at området nok skal rettes lidt i forhold til SDFE Stednavne

https://sdfekort.dk/spatialmap?mapheight=846&mapwidth=1925&label=&ignorefavorite=true&profile=sdfekort&selectorgroups=stednavne+dhm&layers=theme-dtk_skaermkort_daempet_daf+theme-stednavne_daf&opacities=1+1&mapext=566105.1067249273+6303945.195117876+568735.1846173449+6305097.224028043&maprotation=
literan (2021-09-26 21:40:01+00:00): это не МКАД