piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zstadler (2020-09-14 15:11:54+00:00): Hello BMM994,

In this edit you have added a lift gate at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3662190430

However, this node is not part of any road and it's not clear what is it gating.

Could you put it on the relevant road or delete it if it is not known?

Thanks!
lezurdis (2015-07-30 20:42:00+00:00): Sendo que este conjunto de alterações está "(sem comentário)" não sei o que pretendias fazer como alteração.

Não vejo aqui nenhuma melhoria, pelo contrario a separação das vias para a saída já não se situa ao inicio da faixa para sair mas uns 30 metros antes :

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3521762225

Assim a saída está colocada antes da sinalização indicando a saída !

Isto não tem nenhuma realidade física, é por isso que peço a tua autorização para eu poder fazer o revert deste conjunto de alteração.
b-jazz (2018-11-11 20:25:09+00:00): There is already a defined track road for part of these snowmobile gps-tracks(?). You shouldn't be adding a way where one already exists, should you?
Thundercel (2015-08-01 12:25:36+00:00): Olá Ricardo,
o Rio Negro é membro de algumas relações boundarys.
Ele foi alterado neste changeset, mas as relações não foram ajustadas para essa alteração, ficando assim duplicadas.
GerdP (2015-10-24 10:35:38+00:00): please review:
most of the way 361786049 is not visible
in Bing or Mapbox. Where did you find it?
rene78 (2015-10-24 10:37:59+00:00): Strava Heatmaps. Please see link above. Highly recommended to use.
GerdP (2015-10-24 11:28:17+00:00): I see. Is it possible to use them in JOSM as well ?
rene78 (2015-10-25 10:49:02+00:00): Yes, the wiki page says this:
"The Strava heatmap has been added to the JOSM presets, and can be activated through the preferences. (Imagery)"
GerdP (2015-10-25 10:56:12+00:00): thanks, you are right, I did not scroll down enough in the list :-(
If I got that right they show
gps data collected by pedestrian or cyclists only, not motor_vehicles.
So reg. way 160032017 the tag
might be highway=path instead of 
highway=unknown?
rene78 (2015-10-25 11:01:18+00:00): Could be. Even though joggers and cyclists are also exercising on paved roads. I guess this should be checked by a local.

But feel free to change it to "path", anyway.
GerdP (2015-10-25 11:31:48+00:00): okay, will do that later. Why do you think that path implies unpaved? The wiki says
"highway=path is a generic path, either multi-use or unspecified usage, open to all non-motorized vehicles. The path may have any type of surface."
maraf24 (2017-11-02 19:32:14+00:00): source=knowledge? Z pewnością nie.
naoliv (2015-08-01 12:06:23+00:00): Ricardo, outra coisa. Quando já tiver caminhos definindo todo o traçado do rio (como já existia nesses locais), só precisa reaproveitá-los e colocar a tag de rio neles.
mitidi (2015-08-03 22:23:01+00:00): Sim, eu não tinha pensado nisso, mas faz sentido. Devo apagar o rio que eu criei e botar a tag de rio na divisa RJ-MG ?
naoliv (2015-08-03 22:27:21+00:00): Eu já arrumei a divisa.
Geralmente já existe algum caminho definindo a fronteira nesses locais (algumas vezes um pouco grosseiro). Só precisa ajustá-los ao traçado do rio e aproveitar o mesmo caminho, só adicionando waterway e name quando for o caso.
GerdP (2015-12-01 15:41:36+00:00): Hi there!
I've changed maxspeed=2 to lanes=2. OK?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183556081
Константин Гам (2018-10-25 13:50:16+00:00): Вы уверены что за тропе установлен знак "Движение на велосипеде запрещено"?
MnemanRUS (2018-10-26 18:27:16+00:00): Знаков там естественно нет. Узкие тропинки на которых невозможно ехать на велосипеде. Сейчас ситуацию не знаю прошло мого времени.
Константин Гам (2018-10-27 12:25:16+00:00): Тогда зачем ставить теги про legal access...
ширину написать в соотв.тег и норм
naoliv (2015-08-01 11:40:54+00:00): Ricardo, nesses rios que você criou você acabou duplicando vários caminhos que definem a separação entre o RJ e MG.
Precisa tomar cuidado ao mexer nesses tipos de relações.
GerdP (2015-10-23 07:47:04+00:00): please review:
highway=gate on nodes
3657219258 and 3657219255
It seems one node is obsolete, the 
other seems to be a barrier=gate?
RicoElectrico (2016-12-29 23:05:51+00:00): Mógłbyś powiedzieć czym jest ta Osada Witoldówka? Nic nie mogłem znaleźć na jej temat.
Владимир К (2016-07-22 06:29:21+00:00): А почему вы удалили перевал вот с этой https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/428943022/history#map=19/43.97153/39.94147&layers=D точки?
Владимир К (2016-07-22 06:34:31+00:00): Всё, увидел новую точку. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/445850045
Я пожалуй уберу tourism=information в отдельную точку
AndersAndersson (2015-07-23 08:16:51+00:00): Jag ändrade tillbaka Ulvshyttan från village till hamlet igen. Ulvshyttan har ca 100 invånare, alltså är det en hamlet.
Se t.ex.:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
och:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-se/2013-April/002056.html
och:
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sm%C3%A5ort
Zagor (2015-07-23 19:28:30+00:00): Ja, du har rätt. Min tanke var att skilja mellan den större ytan Ulvshyttan och de små hamlet:ar som finns inom samma yta. Men rätt lösning är väl kanske snarare att nedgradera de existerande hamlet:arna.
AndersAndersson (2015-07-23 20:24:40+00:00): Jag håller med om problemet. De ställena är väl dock för stora för att vara isolated_dwelling och det bor folk där så det är ingen locality. Hamlet är nog det minst dåliga valet.
Får man in population går det ju att i framtiden rendera kartan med hänsyn till det.
boneco (2015-07-22 23:21:42+00:00): Não esqueça de atribuir um valor as vias que você cria, você acabou esquecendo dessa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361797318 e dessa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361797317
SomeoneElse (2015-07-29 20:37:34+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Just letting you know that the name of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361799047/history might be misspelt - it's currently "Ampitheatre" but the usual spelling is "Amphitheatre".  One other thing - you've set the "name" of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361799051 to "Field (Minster Sch)".  It's already described as grass (tagged internally as "landuse=grass") so it's clear what it is; if the name isn't really "Field" you don't need to give it that name just so it appears on the map - software that decides how it appears on a map will already know it's grass and will be able to use that information.  Also, if you want, you can draw the outline for the school grounds around the whole site and just have the bit in the middle described as a building.
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this...
UnionStreetMedia (2015-07-22 21:27:52+00:00): Cemetery does not exist
UnionStreetMedia (2015-07-22 21:28:26+00:00): No plans for future cemtary
Peilscheibe (2015-07-23 08:54:31+00:00): Wenn das eine Art Second-hand-Laden ist, könnte man auch shop=second_hand setzen.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-18 06:54:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37912228 where the changeset comment is: reverted fictional mapping in Venezuela after author didn't reply to inquiries made in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37531169
seattlefyi (2015-07-23 01:53:59+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits! They look pretty good!

I have just one comment: The node now named INRIX used to have addr:unit=300. Now it has addr:unit=Suite 400. This node nearby also has addr:unit=400. (http://www.osm.org/node/3333004051). 

It looks like we have two 400s now. Do you happen to know which one should be 300?

Thanks again for editing!
Buskape (2015-07-23 15:25:45+00:00): Thanks for the feedback and question.

The one I put suite 400 is the one related to INRIX.

INRIX also occupy Suite 300 on the same building, however Suite 400 is their official address.

Having said that, we have 2 options: either remove the Suite 300 or keep it, not necessarily related to INRIX to avoid confusion.

Make sense?
seattlefyi (2015-07-24 00:10:44+00:00): So I went ahead and made a few changes: 1) renamed the duplicate 400 to 300 (no Inrix tag). 2) renamed Suite 400 to just 400 (Inrix tag still there). 3) Took the Inrix name off the building outline, since there are probably other businesses in the other units. 4) I left the combined 100;200 you made, though I would personally avoid using multiple values separated by semicolons very often. I don't think many apps parse for multiple values.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 09:55:22+00:00): Hello!

You used
mtb:scale:uphill=2;4
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336546159/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale:uphill=3
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
literan (2015-07-23 09:57:07+00:00): Эх, а что же вы тег name= не ставите.... На половине рендереров название не показывается.
tomhukins (2015-07-23 11:49:57+00:00): Hi, Derick.

You added three trees on the north side of New King's Road between Munster Road and Eddiscome Road.

My photos from Tuesday show a building site here running alongside the pavement with no trees there.  I wonder if the trees should be somewhere else.
Derick Rethans (2015-07-23 13:39:02+00:00): You're right. I added those from Bing, but now you mention it I do remember a construction area there. Feel free to remove them! (Also, so many more things to add!)
tomhukins (2015-07-23 13:53:36+00:00): I'll remove them in my next edit if you haven't beaten me to it - I've also still got lots more to add..
Skippern (2015-07-22 23:41:35+00:00): Toninho, quando voce apagou o rodovia proposta voce quebrou o relação do BR-484, esse e o trecho proposta do BR-484, mesmo se nao ha planos certo para iniciar obra ou autorização do IBAMA, deve fazer parte do relação. Vou restaura-lo.
Skippern (2015-07-23 00:09:56+00:00): Restaurado no changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32815000
naoliv (2015-07-23 00:13:30+00:00): Toninho, evite apagar objetos no mapa que possam parecer estranhos ou errados. Na dúvia é melhor perguntar antes de apagar ou modificar.
Nakaner (2015-08-03 21:41:26+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33083687

Die Europastraßennummer ist schon als int_ref=* erfasst.
Nakaner (2015-08-03 21:42:02+00:00): Außerdem ist OSM kein Ort für "Experimentelles". Dafür gibt es die Dev-API.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-16 13:52:05+00:00): What you wanted to express by adding shop=restaurant to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333931786/history ?
kaharman (2023-02-21 03:07:55+00:00): Yeah, that's wrong. I forgot what I have done, it's 7 years ago. Should be no shop.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-21 19:49:01+00:00): Thanks for a fix!
manof25 (2015-07-23 15:18:51+00:00): Yes I have been into this store and, unfortunately like some other Waitrose stores, there is no customer toilet or cafe in the Southsea branch.
GerdP (2015-10-15 13:42:54+00:00): please review, 
way 344892887 now has the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;track
dolphinling (2015-07-23 05:41:37+00:00): I'm local to this area and have never heard these names used. Additionally, I could find no references to them online. I asked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32629120 for any more information about them, but got no reply.
dolphinling (2015-07-23 05:54:05+00:00): Spear Street is definitely tertiary, and the geometry changes at Quarry Hill road match neither the (best available) VCGI imagery nor Bing imagery. The mistagged geometry additions near the Sheraton weren't really worth making the revert more difficult to try to save.
czubi (2019-05-11 10:41:43+00:00): heist der Fluss wirklich "Bachschleife II" ?
czubi (2019-05-11 10:42:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361834343#map=19/50.85100/10.96343&layers=CN
_torsten_ (2019-05-11 12:28:15+00:00): Öhm ... keine Ahnung, wo ich das damals herhabe. Wir haben den Radweg geplant und den Bau betreut. Vermutlich daher. Ich weiß es nicht mehr.
czubi (2019-05-11 12:31:13+00:00): Nur um sicherzugehen. Du meintest mit Bachschleife (II) wirklich den FLUSS und nicht den RADWEG?
czubi (2019-05-11 12:35:15+00:00): ok. Vielleicht hab ich auch ein Denkfehler. Bach, nicht der Komponist, sondern das Gewässer. Dann könnte es ja hinhausen. Die Straße heißt ja auch An der Bachschleife. OK, ich nehme alles zurück und behaupte das Gegenteil ;-)
zimba (2015-07-24 13:14:49+00:00): Hallo, der champingplatz war schon eingezeichnet (als flaeche). Bitte immer aufpassen, ob etwas schon vorhanden ist. danke!
mavl (2015-07-23 18:10:29+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Деревни Увал больше нет в Тюменской области. 1 ноября 2013 года она вошла в состав Ивановки.
Закон Тюменской области от 1 ноября 2013 г. № 82 "Об объединении, упразднении населенных пунктов Уватского муниципального района Тюменской области и внесении изменений в отдельные законы Тюменской области"

http://www.google.ru/url?url=http://admtyumen.ru/files/upload/%25D0%2597%25D0%25B0%25D0%25BA%25D0%25BE%25D0%25BD%2520%25D0%25A2%25D1%258E%25D0%25BC%25D0%25B5%25D0%25BD%25D1%2581%25D0%25BA%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B9%2520%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B1%25D0%25BB%25D0%25B0%25D1%2581%25D1%2582%25D0%25B8%2520%25D0%25BE%25D1%2582%252001.11.2013%2520%25E2%2584%2596%252082.pdf&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&sa=U&ved=0CB0QFjACahUKEwjwoe_o6PHGAhUG7nIKHd-TBJI&usg=AFQjCNGsFL3_1OY6tZ6_FylXLj9JZ0Pdtw
flohoff (2015-07-23 15:26:39+00:00): Hi Ramirez,

du hast in diesem changeset leider ein paar kleinere fehler. Zum einen hast du Bei hausnummer 167 einige nodes mit dem umliegenden landuse residential verbunden. Dann solltest du für das einzecihen JOSM nehmen und das tracer plugin. Sonst machen wir die arbeit doppelt weil die Häuser nicht annähernd da sind wo sie wirklich sind.

Ausserdem solltest du die Hausnummern nicht als 148d-f eintragen. Es ist nicht klar wie man d-f auflöst so das die Hausnummer wirklich nur als string 148d-f aufzulösen ist. Besser ist es 3 nodes zu setzen mit 148d 148e 148f - im Liegenschaftskataster NRW das wir nutzen dürfen ist das auch so.

Flo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072610 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:26:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072580 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:24:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072578 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:24:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072577 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
xmd5a (2015-07-23 10:12:54+00:00): addr:street должен быть такой же как и name самой улицы, иначе поиск в навигаторах работать не будет
Gumeg (2016-08-02 15:05:37+00:00): Откуда данные по Табунному и Сурочему? На чистом поле практически точки. Поставил на точки place=locality
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-26 00:35:46+00:00): Nie "Sienkiewicza" tylko "Henryka Sienkiewicza".
Pozdrawiam
village (2015-09-09 18:30:14+00:00): ich würde diesen Punkt wieder löschen, denn es gibt http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316089708 mit viel mehr Informationen und vollständiger
Владимир К (2016-05-06 15:24:13+00:00): что вы имели ввиду под access=no на тротуарах?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:24:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072576 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
utack (2015-12-26 11:07:05+00:00): On
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333931786
You have amenity=fuel and shop=restaurant.
Maybe it makes sense to add a node over the building with amenity=restaurant and leave the amenity=fuel for the building?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:24:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072563 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Allison P (2021-02-14 02:02:03+00:00): Are you sure this is an ice road? It seems more likely to be a low-quality TIGER road.
MarkusHD (2015-10-13 18:53:27+00:00): Ein "springy" (Einzelwippe/Federwippe) ist etwas anderes als die beiden Geräte, die hier stehen. Ich kenne die richtige Bezeichnung weder auf deutsch noch auf englisch, sodass ich absichtlich einen ungültigen selbst ausgedachten Wert eingesetzt habe. Ich habe keine Ahnung, welches Wort ich eingeben sollte, um etwas passendes zu finden. Auch bei einem Online-Händler für Spielplatzgeräte konnte ich nichts finden.
Polarbear (2015-10-13 19:48:51+00:00): Mal ein Foto machen und gleich nach wikimedia/commons hochladen, dann können wir nach dem Namen suchen. 

Hier habe ich kürzlich eine Holzplatte mit mehreren Spiralfedern drunter gesehen, auf der man wie auf einem Trampolin hüpfen konnte, ist es sowas?
MarkusHD (2015-10-13 23:25:09+00:00): Nein, der Federmechanismus besteht nicht aus einer Spiralfeder, sondern eher aus einer Schenkelfeder ähnlich wie bei einer Sicherheitsnadel, aber nur mit 3/4 statt 1,5-facher Windung. Das mit dem Foto werde ich bei Gelegenheit machen, beim Stöbern in entsprechenden Kategorien auf Wikimedia Commons habe ich auch nichts passendes gefunden.
MarkusHD (2015-10-16 08:41:35+00:00): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sprungwippe_Oberderdingen_Hinter_dem_Hof.jpg
Polarbear (2015-10-16 11:04:59+00:00): Aha. Das führt zu einer Definitionsfrage, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:playground#Springy
Polarbear (2015-07-23 11:22:58+00:00): changeset comment was meant to read: "OSM: fix typo (missing e)"
BeKri (2016-01-30 13:24:48+00:00): Hallo (Thomas ?),
bezüglich Deiner Eintragungen
Josef-Kaiser-Straße=Spielstrasse
und dem "Zoo" gibt es 2 Notes.
Willst Du Dir das ev. ansehen ?
Danke und habby tagging ... derBeKri
zarl (2016-06-09 06:15:48+00:00): Der "Zoo" entpuppte sich als kleiner Stall für irgendwelche Tiere, vor Ort waren bei meinem Besuch allerdings keine zu sehen. Ich habe die Grösse ans Luftbild angepasst und den Eintrag abgeändert zu building=shed.
zarl (2016-06-09 06:23:27+00:00): Evtl. meinte Thomasmueller den Schaukasten vorne am Zaun (Haderner Weg): der zeigt getöpferte Hasen...
Tara Santaana (2015-07-23 18:47:41+00:00): Be were
Polarbear (2015-07-23 11:43:58+00:00): changeset comment was meant to read: OSM: fix upper case
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072557 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Marián Kyral (2015-08-03 07:51:52+00:00): Ahoj,
díky za příspěvek do mapy. Jen nevím, proč jsi přidal do adresy obytného otevírací hodiny. Pokud je v daném domě nějaký obchod nebo služba, je potřeba vytvořit odpovídající bod zájmu a přidat otevírací hodiny na něj. Například https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2106742076

Díky,
Marián
Florek89 (2024-02-14 21:28:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361886031/history

Wiem, że robione 8 lat temu, ale jakby było to zrobione niedawno to bym po prostu poprawił, a w tym wypadku napiszę, bo tak śmieszniej XD.

addr:housename=Srebrna 8

Tu jest błąd XD
Dawid2849 (2024-02-15 12:35:17+00:00): I jeszcze w name jest ta sama wartość xD
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:23:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072556 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:23:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072554 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072551 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
zimba (2015-07-25 13:34:20+00:00): Hallo,
Wenn das die einzigen Hausnummer des Gebaeudes ist und das Gebaeude eh schon als Flaeche eingetragen ist, kannst du die addr:... Tags auch direkt ans Haus haengen statt einen extra Node zu erstellen, schaut dann schoener aus, und es heisst ja auch "Haus"nummer.

lg
mavl (2015-07-23 18:16:22+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Деревни Родина больше нет в Тюменской области.

Закон Тюменской области от 04.05.2005 № 377 "Об объединении населенных пунктов в форме присоединения поселка Кирсарай, поселка Первомайск и деревни Родина к селу Уват Уватского района"
golyanitskiy (2015-07-23 18:13:52+00:00): спасибо, откатил
golyanitskiy (2015-07-23 18:19:24+00:00): в следующий раз надумаете править отношения, затрагивающие огромные территории - подумайте, а не напортите ли вы чего, юный падаван, зарегистрированный 16 апреля 2015 года
golyanitskiy (2015-07-23 18:41:42+00:00): а пока рекомендую ознакомиться с валидатором http://wowik.000space.com/routes/ - так уж получилось, что до вашего прихода мы каким-то чудом додумались о единой схеме обозначения ref и name
Tatoshka (2015-07-23 18:54:01+00:00): Вечер добрый! Что не так? Добавил название автодороги. Саму трассу не трогал не двигались.
На будущее если уж так хочется показаться невьебенным красноречивым тролем, иди с малолетками пизди на лавочке, там ты будешь в статусе.
d1g (2015-07-24 04:41:51+00:00): Tatosha, очень жаль что некоторые участники считают культивируют моду кидаться на новичков.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Автодороги

В России прямо сейчас отмечено большинство маршрутов. Тот же Самара-Волгоград: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/309416

Трасса называется не "Самара - Волгоград", обратите внимание на оф. источники и их дату.

Если у вас есть предложения как можно переобозначить и что - предлагаю начать тему на форуме т.к. эти изменения будут касаться всей страны, а не только 30 дорог которые вы успели изменить за вечер: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21
d1g (2015-07-24 04:43:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_names - названия за 2010-2013 года
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:23:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072544 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Rafael Barbosa (2015-07-23 12:50:33+00:00): Mudança de sentido na Rua Afonso Vaz. A algum tempo só é permitido entrar nela através da Raposo Tavares.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072542 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072540 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072539 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
GerdP (2015-10-19 15:09:28+00:00): please review way 260288775,
I've changed it to highway=residential,
but the name might also be wrong
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072538 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072537 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072534 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source