piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
saudotb (2021-03-01 07:37:25+00:00): تصنيف الأنهار مبالغ فيه للغاية بالنسبة لهذه الوديان. قد يكون النهر مناسباً للأودية الكبيرة مثل وادي حنيفة بالرياض وغيرها
The classification of rivers is very exaggerated for these valleys. The river may be suitable for large valleys such as Wadi Hanifa in Riyadh and others
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-01 08:41:33+00:00): هذا مخالف للموجود في الويكي والمتفق عليه وأنا أنظر لهذا التعديل وبهذا التوقيت (في نهاية الشهر) نظر الريبه وذلك لأنكم لا ترغبون أن يكون هذه المجاري المائية موجودة في التحديث القادم لخرائط السعودية على أوسماند وبالتالي لا يتعارض مع خرائطكم الخارجيه الخاصة والموجودة على تطبيكم:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.rahal.team
وأرى أن هذا الفعل هو استكمالاً لعمليات  التخريب السابقة والتي حصلت في وقت سابق مثل:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95712777
saudotb (2021-03-01 11:27:22+00:00): مرحبا اخ عبدالله
فهمت من كلامك ان عندك مشكله مع اشخاص ولم افهم موضوع نهاية الشهر.!!
الخريطة لها فئات صحيحه والاوديه التي وضعتها فئتها الصحيحه stream وليس نهر هل يقارن مثلا نهر النيل او حتى وادي الرمه (بشعيب) ، اضافه إلى انك مجتهد في الخريطة ولكن اسمح لي أن اقول بشكل خاطئ ، في السابق فتحت مناقشه
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98556006#map=10/23.2065/42.4688
ولو كلفت على نفسك قليلاً وشفت التعديل عرفت ان النقطتين مكرره وسقط سهواً كتابتها في الوصف.
نصيحة محب لا تحاول تفتح نقاشات وتنفر الرسامين فالجميع يرغب في أن تصبح خريطة بلده بالشكل الجيد.
انظر إلى هذا الرسم الخاطئ المضاف مؤخراً فكرت في ازالته ولكن في نفس عرفت انك ستفتح مناقشه !! فتركتها حيث ااني لا احب ذلك فسوء الرسم لا يحتاج إلى توضيح أكثر مما هو عليه
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100031939#map=16/25.8400/49.8359
واسمح لي اخيرا اتمنى انت ترسم معي الطرق وتصححها حيث أن اغلبها غير مرسوم ويوجد به اخطاء كثيره بالإضافه إلى ادراج مواقع الخدمات المهمه مثل المستشفيات والمحطات والسوبرماركت وغيرها فهي من يحتاجها المستخدم
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-01 13:02:09+00:00): لست بمنفر كما تقول، ولو كنت صادقاً ولست عضوا في "فريق رحال" الذين يقومون بحذف المجاري المائية وبعض المناطق الطبيعية التي على الوسوم:
"natural=scrub"و "natural=wetland" و"waterway=river" و "waterway=stream" وغيرها وقد قمت أنت بحذف مناطق معهم موسومه بالوسم "natural=scrub" وفي خلال نفس الفترة التي كانوا يقومون فيها بحذف الأماكن الأخرى وقمت بها في التغييرات Changeset التالية:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/91786610
https://osmcha.org/changesets/95727335
https://osmcha.org/changesets/95712777
https://osmcha.org/changesets/95065827
https://osmcha.org/changesets/94811385
https://osmcha.org/changesets/94738246
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-01 13:05:21+00:00): أيضاً طبقا للويكي الخاص بالوسم waterway=stream :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream
فإن الوسم ينطبق على الشعبان الضيقة جدا وغيره يكون على الوسم waterway=river، اقرأ العبارة التالية في الصفحة:
(the commonly accepted rule for OpenStreetMap is that a stream can be jumped across by an active, able-bodied person).
SalehR7 (2021-03-01 15:49:36+00:00): يسوي يسوقها علينا هالطعس ؟
والله مشكلة
SomeoneElse (2021-02-28 21:16:03+00:00): Hello fifa2020,
"Return data deleted by hossein132" isn't a good changeset comment.  The population for this place has been changed to and fro between 7828 and 15000 for many revisions, yet the source of the population (allegedly amar.org.ir ) and the date (allegedly 2018) have not changed.  The 7828 figure seems to date from 2006, so is likely incorrect, but what page on amar.org.ir  has the 15000 figure?  If you can't provide a source we may need to have to change it back.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-02-28 21:16:43+00:00): سلام fifa2020 ،
"بازگشت داده های پاک شده توسط hossein132" نظر خوبی در مورد تغییرات نیست. جمعیت این مکان برای بسیاری از تجدید نظرها بین 7828 تا 15000 تغییر و تغییر کرده است ، با این حال منبع جمعیت (گفته می شود amar.org.ir) و تاریخ (ظاهرا 2018) تغییر نکرده اند. به نظر می رسد رقم 7828 مربوط به سال 2006 باشد ، بنابراین احتمالاً نادرست است ، اما کدام صفحه در amar.org.ir دارای رقم 15000 است؟ اگر نمی توانید منبعی را ارائه دهید ، ممکن است لازم باشد آن را دوباره تغییر دهیم.
با احترام،
اندی
vaccine (2021-03-02 09:11:31+00:00): Hi Lone wolf,

IMHO it's a little bit childish to run a mechanical changeset just to remove the old "created_by" tags and then calling it "Fixing geometry errors". This sounds innocuous ...

Please learn about 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F

Best wishes,
Mr. vaccine
vaccine (2021-03-02 09:40:17+00:00): Please don't remove duplicated nodes through "blind validating" when the underlying NHD data is outdated and geometrically wrong. This is a case for manual cleanup: Be inspired by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ELadner/history great work in the Mississippi delta.
ZeLonewolf (2021-03-02 13:21:20+00:00): Hello Mister Vaccine,
I've been working hard over several days to clean up river issues in SC.  As you know there's quite a mess in the data set and I've been doing my best to try to sort it out.  Overlapping geometry, features that don't match imagery, stream objects in the middle of rivers, etc.  The wetland mapping seems to be especially problematic.  In any case, if there is an area that you think I've mangled or needs particular attention I'd be happy to put a special focus on it.
Carnildo (2021-03-01 05:27:57+00:00): The "Maxar Premium" imagery is slightly newer than the default "Bing" imagery in this area, and shows that a driveway you deleted actually exists.
bas57 (2021-03-01 15:03:13+00:00): Hi Carnildo, How do I go back and look to see what I have delete?

  Thanks
Carnildo (2021-03-01 21:35:49+00:00): There are a number of changeset viewers.  I prefer Achavi (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100156889), but OSMCha (https://osmcha.org/changesets/100156889/) is also popular.
Rainero (2021-03-01 21:22:39+00:00): Hallo lberges,
bei diesem Edit ist die PLZ-Grenze 83329 kaputt gegangen, d.h. die Linienabschnitte waren nicht mehr in der richtigen Reihenfolge.
Der iD-Editor hat nicht den besten Ruf zur Bearbeitung solcher Grenzrelationen, daher ist Vorsicht angesagt.
Ich habe in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100230705 die Reihenfolge der Linienabschnitte richtiggestellt.
Und noch eine Bitte: schreib doch etwas aussagekräftigere Änderungssatzkommentare; das macht es anderen Mappern leichter zu verstehen, was geändert wurde und was die Intention dabei war. 
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:comment
und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Servus,
Rainer
TheRimos (2021-04-02 03:30:27+00:00): Av. Victor Andrés Belaunde. Se debe considerar una avenida transitable
eggie (2021-02-28 21:52:06+00:00): Tip 
Wel netjes maar.... 
Maak van die aparte vlakken gewoon een groot vlak als amenity=parking
Het ziet anders blauw van de P's.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking

mvg
eggie
janwillem99 (2021-02-28 22:05:55+00:00): Yes heb het gedaan
eggie (2021-02-28 22:14:42+00:00): Top!
SomeoneElse (2021-03-01 20:16:23+00:00): Hello fifa2020,
"Edit roads" is still not a good changeset comment.  Please explain what you have changed and why.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-03-01 20:16:27+00:00): مرحبًا fifa2020 ،
لا يزال "تعديل الطرق" تعليقًا غير جيد للتغييرات في المجموعة. يرجى توضيح ما قمت بتغييره ولماذا.
تحياتي الحارة،
آندي
farshid20 (2021-03-02 21:39:00+00:00): Hello. I corrected the sabotage on the map and uploaded it.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-02 21:50:58+00:00): "Hello. I corrected the sabotage on the map and uploaded it." is also not a good changeset comment.
hossein132 (2021-03-03 15:26:05+00:00): Previously blocked and re-created the account.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4628
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4703
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4706
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4781
farshid20 (2021-03-04 15:05:27+00:00): User hossein132 tries to deceive you and tries to destroy the communication roads by overcoming himself in the game
Jrachi (2025-05-15 17:10:11+00:00): Ciao.
Il nome in piemontese che hai inserito non ha un nome ufficiale in italiano?
O si tratta del nome dialettale del comune, Azzano d'Asti?
mga_geo (2021-03-01 07:18:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis surpris par la création du rond-point, je ne le vois pas sur l'imagerie.
La bretelle d'accès à la D700 n'est plus raccordée à la rue Marcel Proust, c'est normal ?
Marc
P JDB (2021-03-01 11:03:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui normal. C'est le dernier cadeau de M Ecobichon aux automobilistes. Il a été construit au second semestre 2020. La Bretelle que vous évoquez va être déconstruite. (pour l'instant elle est déconnecté et barrée par des plots). De même la sortie directe du parking de l'hopital est construite, mais pas encore en service.
PJDB
mga_geo (2021-03-01 18:05:45+00:00): Bonsoir,
Il ne me reste plus qu'à remettre en place le trajet de quelques lignes de bus ...
Marc
P JDB (2021-03-01 18:26:42+00:00): Désolé, mais je ne maîtrise pas trop ces modifications :-(
Est-ce vous qui avez remis tout le réseau TUB d'équerre depuis quelques mois ?
mga_geo (2021-03-01 20:19:22+00:00): Les relations transport sont maintenant ma principale activité sur OSM. Elles sont assez fragiles et j'essaye de leur faire suivre les évolutions.
Oui, j'ai sévi sur le réseau TUB.
Marc
felipeeugenio (2021-03-01 15:09:00+00:00): Por favor no pegar parques a las calles.
gracias
aceman444 (2022-02-09 09:31:05+00:00): Zmenili ste len nazvy ulic, ale adresy nie, takze vsetky su teraz vyhodnocovane, ze chyba ulica na ktoru sa odvolavaju...
Jose Riha (2022-02-09 13:23:57+00:00): a co napr. historia tohto objektu? je to adresa a bola expandovana:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8018301435/history
aceman444 (2022-02-09 15:30:05+00:00): No tak, asi sa niektore expandovali a niektore nie. Lebo stale narazam na vela adries co zostali addr:street="Nám. " . Dalo by sa to dokoncit? Dakujem
Jose Riha (2022-02-17 16:12:39+00:00): no ja som ich cez overpass prave moc nenasiel. co som nasiel je napr. tento uzol: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3228681153#map=19/48.42723/17.79628

lenze tam je problem ten, ze ho nenaslo kvoli chybajucemu addr:housenumber (preto nebol zahrnuty do hromadnej zmeny)
Jose Riha (2022-02-17 20:45:05+00:00): uz netreba (chyba aktualizacia budov - teda objekty typu way)
aceman444 (2022-02-17 22:39:14+00:00): Hej, napr. v Petrzalke ich je dost.
eggie (2021-03-01 06:35:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedback.. Om te voorkomen dat brandgangetjes gaan mee routeren in gps en routingapps is het soms verstandig om access=private toe te voegen.
Behalve natuurlijk als het doorgaande routes zijn. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2021-03-01 04:34:57+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912190941
Hamhock666 (2021-03-01 17:04:47+00:00): Hello, I would assume you mean the `massgis:*` tags? Those are from a state import into OSM from almost ten years ago. I think they can be removed, but I often don't in case they are useful to another mapper (eg. massgis:PUB_ACCESS).
user_5359 (2021-03-01 17:28:50+00:00): The key massages:PUB_ACCESS four values Y, N, L, X see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/massgis:PUB_ACCESS#values . I am sure that these values can be translated into access.
Frans S (2021-07-15 09:19:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
You are a very new mapper.
You mapped this area as a hospital.
Is this local knowledge?
Best regards
willisturm (2021-05-19 12:05:42+00:00): Hi Kartograf,
The tag highway=traffic_sign is not required for place-name signs, traffic_sign=city_limit is sufficient.
Have a nice day.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2021-05-19 20:43:57+00:00): Ok, I will see on it.
user_11418917 (2021-03-01 19:54:25+00:00): Can you show us proper documentations states and back your claims? Otherwise I will revert. Thank you.
NFZANMNIM (2021-03-01 20:19:06+00:00): Article 4 of Iraq's constitution

"The Arabic language and the Kurdish language are the two official languages of Iraq.
The right of Iraqis to educate their children in their mother tongue, such as Turkmen,
Assyrian, and Armenian shall be guaranteed in government educational institutions
in accordance with educational guidelines, or in any other language in private
educational institutions."

source: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Iraq_2005.pdf?lang=en
user_11418917 (2021-03-05 15:07:08+00:00): @NFZANMNIM      
Wrong. Read here:     
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Iraq
NFZANMNIM (2021-03-05 15:44:03+00:00): The wikipedia link cites the same article of Iraq's constitution. 

This is from the link you sent me.

"According to the Article 4 of the Constitution, Arabic and Kurdish are the official languages of Iraq, while three other languages: Turkmen, Syriac and Armenian, are recognized as minority languages. "
Note_Fixer (2021-02-28 23:12:27+00:00): Note 2558435
acres1nvented (2021-03-02 10:01:30+00:00): Out of interest, would highway=tertiary be a more appropriate tag for the areas of TCR you've classed as highway=service? This is a route that is heavily used by cyclists as well as just buses, and has much traffic outside of hours, so classifying it as just a busway, even with the new restrictions, feels odd to me? Interested to hear your thoughts as TCR is in a fairly niche category of bus gated but large roads
Note_Fixer (2021-02-28 23:30:40+00:00): Note 2558436
MxxCon (2021-03-02 07:03:02+00:00): Hello.
Please note as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone, digits of phone numbers should be separated only by - or space. Round brackets ( ) should not be used. 👍
mrarrarr (2021-03-02 12:42:38+00:00): Thank you! Just updated.
jonorossi (2021-03-02 01:21:09+00:00): Hi, I don't believe the hazard=yes tag you've added to a section of the cycleway makes sense. "yes" doesn't mean anything. This tag "is intended to tag hazards that are explicitly declared by posted signage and/or government declaration".

I don't recall anything other than road crossings that could be a concern there, and crossings have their own tagging.

Take a read of the wiki for more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hazard

Jono
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:50:41+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 00:13:58+00:00): Note 1590189
elsy1 (2021-03-02 08:45:23+00:00): سلام شما نام جاده هارو از علویجه به علویچه تغییر دادید  توضیحی برایا نجام اینکارتون دارید؟
elsy1 (2021-03-02 08:47:14+00:00): لطفا سریع تر تمام اشتباهات رو تصحیح بفرمایید.
farshid20 (2021-03-04 15:05:49+00:00): بله سپاس
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 00:25:39+00:00): Note 1984062
skquinn (2021-03-01 00:37:42+00:00): Thanks, good work.
gendy54 (2021-03-01 00:36:20+00:00): Bonsoir Rémi,

Je tombe par hasard sur tes changeset. Il serait préférable de faire un changeset plus global que pour chaque PEI.
gendy54 (2021-03-01 00:38:11+00:00): J'en profite aussi pour te dire que l'aide de Google Street View n'est pas autorisée. C'est un point hyper important. Il ne peut servir que très épisodiquement.
Nous disposons de données ouvertes pour les PEI sur le 34.
gendy54 (2021-03-01 00:40:22+00:00): Pour ajouter les PEI, passe par http://www.osmlab.fr/OSM/odin/ qui est fait exprès. Nicolas Moyroud qui est contributeur dans le coin et qui travaille chez les pompiers a mis à dispo les données.
sander79 (2021-03-01 09:30:20+00:00): goede morgen,

we hebben nu 2x een amenity=fire_station. Zou je dat kunnen samenvoegen ?
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 00:51:51+00:00): Note 2353751
user_5359 (2021-03-01 04:41:38+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys. 
I change Building (to building) and Landuse (to landuse), but HUERTA? 
Also the combination building and landuse is unusual.
syntex (2021-03-01 10:50:17+00:00): Again?
lasagna (2021-07-12 18:23:56+00:00): Hello,

I was surprised to see that you changed the operator and substance tags of Bay Division Pipeline No. 4.
I didn't expect this water pipeline to end up used for a different fluid.
What is your source for this change?

Thanks
ArielCal (2021-07-12 18:34:29+00:00): This is a water pipeline https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887619156#map=13/37.4476/-122.2347

If I changed that then it was an error.
lasagna (2021-07-12 19:41:55+00:00): OK, I'll change it back.
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 01:08:18+00:00): Note 2360412
Note 2272496
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 01:20:53+00:00): Note 2270161
eggie (2021-03-01 06:41:28+00:00): Feedback :
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam.  

Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse. 

Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665 

We tekenen dus de landuse isn. bv 
landuse=grass en waar een boom staat natural=tree op een node.
leisure=park gebruiken we alleen voor echte parken en is een losse transparant die de functie en naam duidt.

Een klein stukje groen valt niet onder de definitie van een park in OSM. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-01 06:52:59+00:00): Even als voorbeeld omgezet naar landuse
janwillem99 (2021-03-01 09:53:51+00:00): Ah helder, en mijn complimenten voor hoe gedetailleerd het is gemaakt.
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 01:31:44+00:00): Note 1849428
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 01:36:53+00:00): Note 2286753
Kovoschiz (2021-03-01 04:09:16+00:00): Is it very hard to understand a `=pier` is different from a `=quay`?
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 01:55:42+00:00): Note 2235438
NeisReview (2025-04-05 16:52:48+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164528767
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 02:02:27+00:00): Note 1629252
Hans Thompson (2021-03-01 17:07:05+00:00): nice edit!
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 02:09:39+00:00): Note 2122014
Note 2122026
Note 2122027
Anton Khorev (2021-03-01 16:03:51+00:00): Hello.  
Why did you delete these objects? Are they outdated?
（自动翻译）
你好。
为什么删除这些对象？ 他们过时了吗？
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 02:16:56+00:00): Note 913910
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 02:25:40+00:00): Note 1583407
PT-53 (2021-03-01 07:48:44+00:00): Hallo wermark,
Du hast das Flußbett der Donau in Scheer von
waterway=riverbank
abgeändert auf
natural=water + water=river.
Warum?
Es gibt 2 Tagging-Methoden, wobei waterway=riverbank wesentlich öfters verwendet wird, insbesondere auch bei der Donau innerhalb Baden-Württemberg.
Bitte nimm Deine Änderungen wieder zurück.
Grüße
wermak (2021-03-01 16:03:23+00:00): Der iD-Editor schlägt diese Variante vor. Habe es erstmal wieder geändert.

Schöne Grüße
PT-53 (2021-03-01 17:34:43+00:00): Hallo wermark,
danke für Deine Rückmeldung und Rücksetzung der Änderungen.

Der Editor ID ist - leider - dafür bekannt, daß dessen Entwickler sich öfters nicht am Wiki orientiert und seine eigenen Vorstellungen als Vorlage in ID einbaut. Man sollte deshalb nie blind den Vorschlägen in ID folgen sondern sich zuvor selbst im Wiki informieren. 

Grüße
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 02:44:35+00:00): Note 2559875
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 03:03:12+00:00): Note 1262508
VictorIE (2021-04-25 02:01:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531388909 Mapped as building and land use
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 03:10:50+00:00): Note 1016508
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 03:16:11+00:00): Changeset: 100164608
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 03:23:17+00:00): Note 1789963
user_5359 (2021-03-01 04:06:12+00:00): Hello! Please check the key ele of the lake: two different values?
Note_Fixer (2021-03-01 03:28:29+00:00): Note 257675
ScottWalkerAU (2021-03-01 04:08:33+00:00): Looks good, but the lanes count is now off
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100164991
TheSwavu (2021-03-01 11:09:17+00:00): Also the north bound lanes are oneway in the wrong direction.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-03-01 11:12:11+00:00): Ah can't see direction on OSMCha apparently. I'll fix it up for them.
skquinn (2021-03-01 03:59:53+00:00): Oops, Reno, not Carson City
voschix (2021-03-06 15:11:38+00:00): This changeset made four islands in the River Adige invisible on the map:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354900135/,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355179237/,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706332903/,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355301401/
voschix (2021-03-06 15:16:49+00:00): Furthermore, the River Zero ("Fiume" Zero in Italian) now has a different name on the river centre ("Fiume Zero") and on the riverbank ("Fluro Zero") - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912239873/
Dimitar155 (2021-03-06 15:51:38+00:00): Thanks for telling me about these mistakes. I've just fixed them. The only thing that I didn't fix is the first island that you mentioned since it wasn't visible on any imagery. I've also spotted another mistake which I will try to fix now.
Dimitar155 (2021-03-06 21:22:59+00:00): It looks like the fixes have rendered. You can see them here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100541944
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100544331
user_8101879 (2022-06-10 15:17:47+00:00): It looks you don't understand the differences between a waterway relation (a collection of not closed ways) and a multipolygon (a collection of closed ways) : you destroy a lot of good tags to put bad ones. maybe you should read the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway
Best regards
Dimitar155 (2022-06-10 18:48:11+00:00): Thank you for pointing it out @Fred. I've looked through part of this changeset and I see some broken things. I will try and fix them.
Dimitar155 (2022-06-10 20:03:13+00:00): I've fixed a few broken relations. It seems like you have dealt with most of the mistakes. Let me know if there is anything else that is wrong.
Best regards,
Dimitar
user_8101879 (2022-06-11 15:01:28+00:00): Good work.
Best regards
Fred
Anton Khorev (2021-03-03 11:45:22+00:00): Landuse on a non-closed way:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912248426

iD's warning tag "warnings:mismatched_geometry:area_as_line" is likely about this way
Anton Khorev (2021-03-03 13:10:07+00:00): same here:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88174255
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-19 05:11:15+00:00): Hello p_ravalika, 
Your edit looks awesome.
I modified the geometry of this object (Way 912252616)(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/912252616) based on Maxar's image because it is crossing with the waterbody.
If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.


Thankyou
Strubbl (2021-03-09 20:42:10+00:00): Hallo crossgolf_rebel,

um Wege auf privaten Grundstücken zu markieren, sollte man den Tag access=private nutzen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dprivate 

Genau dafür ist er da. Die Wege zu löschen ist nicht gut. Sie sind offensichtlich auf den Satellitenbildern zu sehen. Das heißt irgendwann wird irgendjemand diese wieder einzeichnen. Es ist hilfreicher diese Wege eingezeichnet, aber als privat markiert zu sehen. Desweiteren kann man Zäune und Tore auch einzeichnen.

Bitte mache deine Änderung rückgängig.

Gruß
Strubbl