piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2020-04-15 08:52:37+00:00): Hi,
you added a tag twice on several POIs:

type:FR:FINESS = 500
type:FR:finess = 500

The first one is the correct spelling. I just fixed a few of them.

Cheers
Jan
BCNorwich (2020-04-14 14:19:41+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You in part made a duplicate highway with the footpath. I've removed the duplicate section and tagged the short residential section as a PRoW.
Regards Bernard.
StreetFan (2020-04-14 15:42:20+00:00): Hi Bernard, I'm new to this and haven't found my way round yet. Because of the way it was shown before, many people drive here trying to find a way to the Pavilion, whereas it is a dead-end and mostly private property.  The footpath leads there, but there is no vehicular access. There is a private drive running part way beside it that was wrongly labelled as part of Essex Gardens.
Regards, Bruce
BCNorwich (2020-04-14 17:01:50+00:00): Hi Bruce, I accept your reasoning. But as the way was mapped and tagged anyone using OSM data derived map or routing would not be guided up there to the Pavilion as there was a footpath (pedestrian access only) section to restrict going onto the park. So anyone doing as you say would be acting against what OSM data shows. OSM data must be ground truth data, not data presented to give a personal desire.
Actually I think there is a barrier on this way before it joins the path on the edge of the park. But from the Bing image I can't quite make out what it is.
archie (2020-04-14 12:35:24+00:00): What is the source of this - well let me call it fancyroad - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791761019?
archie (2020-04-14 12:37:02+00:00): This residential highway, where did you get the idea? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791761012
archie (2020-04-14 12:38:34+00:00): This road is on no other map. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791760997
archie (2020-04-14 12:39:27+00:00): Which source for this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791760990?
archie (2020-04-14 12:40:21+00:00): Where is this road in reallity? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791760993
archie (2020-04-14 12:42:05+00:00): I think this cs is pure vandalism.

Source for this "road" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791761022
marczoutendijk (2020-04-14 14:24:45+00:00): Blocked by DWG:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3606

archie: can you revert?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
archie (2020-04-14 14:42:38+00:00): Yes I will revert the two last ones (from today).
Minasome (2020-04-14 20:30:51+00:00): thanks for your update :)
archie (2020-04-14 12:44:41+00:00): This is gross vandalism.

Source for this "highway" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791763151?
archie (2020-04-14 12:51:30+00:00): Tell me that this is not vandalism.

What's the purpuse of those "highways":

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791763145

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791763147

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791763146

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791763148

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791763144
marczoutendijk (2020-04-14 14:24:31+00:00): Blocked by DWG:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3606

archie: can you revert?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
archie (2020-04-14 14:47:18+00:00): Yes I will revert the two last ones (from today).
eggie (2020-04-14 12:52:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-14 13:02:26+00:00): Dag DG,
Als lokale mapper zul je wel weten of de weg toegankelijk is voor regulier verkeer. In 2014 is de weg op motorr_vehicle=no gezet en later door een ervaren mapper op destination. 
De weg gaat dus nu weer routeren voor Jan en Alleman. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-14 13:06:03+00:00): motor_vehicle=yes is trouwen default en hoef je niet te taggen.
eggie (2020-04-14 13:06:40+00:00): trouwen?? > typo  trouwens  :)
fabiotofy (2020-10-16 10:32:48+00:00): Ciao, stavamo facendo delle verifiche allo stradario di Ronchi dei Legionari ed il Comune (ufficio anagrafe e ufficio CED) disconoscono il nome della rotonda come "Piazzale Veronica Gambara". Dove lo hai reperito ? Perché non vi sono tabelle esposte. Grazie
Soleilsoleilsoleil (2020-04-14 12:42:45+00:00): Bonjour, ceci est un test! C'est Gaëlle, de l'IFAID.
Vinber-Pro (2020-04-14 15:33:17+00:00): cela marche :)
bernardo60 (2021-02-01 06:32:09+00:00): Sorry, this "missing link" you added, does not exist. My friends got stuck in that area with their mountain bikes looking for a way to cross the river. Quite an adventure. It has been corrected meanwhile.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83535517
LoloForest (2021-02-02 00:56:36+00:00): Hello bernardo60. Thanks for the message. I see you added a stream in this location [https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-8.49388424059405/115.15354566442973] and updated the roads. I also went through and looked at other roads along the waterway to see if there are other similar issues and didn’t spot anything. Thank you for the additions to the map and for letting me know.
trigpoint (2020-04-14 13:14:34+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. 

Thank you for your edit however I am always a  bit concerned when a new mapper begins by deleting a large number of existing objects.

Please continue to map, but try to add new objects and please look at and consider the warnings generated by the editor, such as crossing buildings.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2020-04-20 18:24:38+00:00): No response and based on later edits I have reverted this.
BCNorwich (2020-04-14 14:22:55+00:00): Duplication is removed
iandees (2020-04-14 17:14:22+00:00): Looks great! Thanks for adding this connection.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83535667
Leo Slager (2020-04-14 13:56:34+00:00): Your changeset covers a far to great part of the world.
Please make changes in a little area, upload the changes and move to an other part of the world.  Please do not move the map when in edit-modus. You may damage the map without you noticed it.
eggie (2020-04-14 14:29:04+00:00): reverted by changeset #83540643
eggie (2020-04-14 14:30:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Svp je edits voorzien van concreet commentaar en svp stoopen met in hoog tempo van alles aan de landuse te veranderen. ees je svp eerst goed in .. Dan weet je wat we van startende mappers verwachten.
MVG,
Eggie
skfd (2020-04-14 15:33:26+00:00): Привет! Мне кажется стоить добавить номер телефона или адрес сайта 😀
FuseR (2020-04-14 20:08:07+00:00): Я добавил )))
Vinber (2020-04-14 20:24:40+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier 1 / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Cas particulier 2 / Si vous êtes un commerçant et que vous souhaitez voir apparaître votre commerce dans OpenStreetMap et donc également sur Ça reste ouvert, Qwant Maps, ... 1 lien ressource : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop 

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-04-14 20:24:32+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier 1 / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Cas particulier 2 / Si vous êtes un commerçant et que vous souhaitez voir apparaître votre commerce dans OpenStreetMap et donc également sur Ça reste ouvert, Qwant Maps, ... 1 lien ressource : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop 

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-04-14 20:24:15+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier 1 / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Cas particulier 2 / Si vous êtes un commerçant et que vous souhaitez voir apparaître votre commerce dans OpenStreetMap et donc également sur Ça reste ouvert, Qwant Maps, ... 1 lien ressource : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop 

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
sanchi (2020-04-14 13:38:33+00:00): Hola. 
Puedes decirnos cómo has hecho para introducir los datos de tus ediciones en OSM. Tienen bastantes errores que con una edición normal no sucederían y no se ha tenido en cuenta lo ya existente.

Un saludo.
sanchi (2020-04-14 15:11:50+00:00): Por favor contesta a este comentario antes de seguir editando.
mupifa (2020-04-15 10:48:28+00:00): hola, perdon, son datos desde el catastro, editando con josm
sanchi (2020-04-15 11:30:18+00:00): ¿Cómo has pasado los datos del catastro a JOSM?
mupifa (2020-04-15 20:01:15+00:00): con el plugin de import dxf
sanchi (2020-04-16 09:05:12+00:00): Buenas

Es lo que parecía por eso te preguntaba antes de hacer nada. Los procesos de importación llevan un procedimiento para evitar cometer errores masivos. Tienes más información en la wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n

En este caso a parte de no haber seguido el procedimiento se ven varios errores claros. Primero se han importado todas las geometrías sin comprobar lo que significan. Por ello se han subido partes de edificios como si fueran edificios enteros. Se han duplicado múltiples nodos en las diferentes intersecciones de edificios. El propio validador de JOSM salta más de 2000 errores de este tipo. No se ha tenido en cuenta lo que ya existía anteriormente en la zona. Edificios encima de edificios, no mantenimiento del historiasl, edificios encima de calles... No se ha comprobado si los edificios que se han añadido existen realmente.

En el caso de catastro en la comunidad de OSM España tenemos ya pasado todo el procedimiento de importación y estamos ya realizando importaciones controladas en varias zonas. Por aquí tienes toda la información del proceso
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Catastro_espa%C3%B1ol/Importaci%C3%B3n_de_edificios/Gu%C3%ADa_de_importaci%C3%B3n
Te podría ayudar sin problema para preparar la importación de La Fregeneda si quieres realizarla. Puedes ver otros pueblos de Salamanca ya importados como Peñaranda de Bracamonte y ver los resultados que se consiguen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/341429

En cuanto a esta importación errónea me temo que debemos revertir todos los cambios realizados ya que son erróneos y dejarlo como estaba antes. Por lo que procederé a dejarlo como estaba antes.

Saludos.
Frans S (2020-04-19 11:05:03+00:00): Hello Abdica212
Thanks for mapping here 
Please take (another) look at the instruction page how to tag highways.
You tag track on an thoroughgoing going road and tag residential as access to a single dwelling in a rural area.
I corrected them
Best regards and keep mapping
Britzz (2020-04-14 20:12:07+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ... via ces commentaires ou les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra
Par ailleurs, vous aviez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : êtes-vous sûre d'avoir bien situé les magasins ? la photo aérienne ne montre pas de bâtiments à cet endroit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83536815
DELAS EMILIE (2020-04-14 20:36:58+00:00): Bonjour,
Il me semblait que le bâtiment était représenté pas le carré marron. Pour les trois commerces crées, ils existent bien.
C'est mon coup d'essai
Britzz (2020-04-15 07:17:10+00:00): Oui vous avez raison, je m'étais, à tort, fié à une photo aérienne trop ancienne ; vous avez raison, votre ajout est bon.
Bonne poursuite dans OSM.
Britzz (2020-04-14 20:07:55+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ... via ces commentaires ou les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra
Par ailleurs, vous aviez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est OK.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83537593
Andrea Musuruane (2020-04-16 06:32:42+00:00): Ciao. Sei sicuro che la chiesa abbia un numero civico associato? Perché le chiese sono una delle poche cose che per normativa non hanno un numero civico. Comnque, il numero civico deve essere inserito come nodo in corrispondenza dell'accesso (cancello, porta, ecc) e non sull'edificio. Ciao, Andrea
Geomark srl (2020-04-16 15:27:43+00:00): Il numero civico che ho indicato è quello relativo all'ufficio parrocchiale, allora per correttezza posso vedere di modificarlo e inserirlo come nodo all'altezza del cancello. Grazie
Andrea Musuruane (2020-04-16 15:31:08+00:00): Perfetto. Grazie a te! Andrea
BCNorwich (2020-04-14 14:27:55+00:00): Hi, This was correctly tagged and only needed amending to suit your new info. I've corrected the parking tags to show it as an enclosed area for patrons.
Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-04-14 16:34:46+00:00): Hi, Please don't delete and redraw an area when it only needs for the original area to be amended. This action loses all te OSM history associated with the originally mapped feature.
Regards Bernard.
oapalfruit (2020-04-14 17:20:05+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Understood, apologies. 

Thanks for letting me know.

Regards
Britzz (2020-04-14 20:00:25+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ... via ces commentaires ou les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra
Par ailleurs, vous aviez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est bon, mais pourquoi layer=-1, ce serait plutôt =0 et dans ce cas pas besoin de l'indiquer explicitement, vous pouvez ne pas enregistrer de layer du tout.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83538026
eggie (2020-04-14 15:15:59+00:00): Sportvelden intekenen is prima.. Maar erover heen ligt ook al een leisure pitch. dat heb ik nu veranderd in sports_centre. Anders zie je een pitch in een pitch. Omdat de grote overkoepelende pitch in de knoop lag renderde die niet meer groen. Het zal zo wel weer netjes renderen.
Eggie
BCNorwich (2020-04-14 14:32:56+00:00): Changed tagging to building which it is.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-04-16 06:27:21+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Ho notato che hai aggiunto il tag motor_vehicle=yes a Via Vittorio di Sambuy. Ovvero che è possibile passare con un mezzo a motore in quella strada. Questo è già un valore di default, non è necessario specificarlo (come foot=yes, bycicle=yes, ecc). Ciao, Andrea
Geomark srl (2020-04-16 15:34:17+00:00): Grazie per il benvenuto, non mi ricordo di aver aggiunto quel parametro, io ho semplicemente unito le due vie, probabilmente era presente in un tratto di via ed è stato inserito nell'unione, non ho controllato tutti i parametri presenti. Per correttezza vado a rimuoverlo. Grazie per la precisazione
Andrea Musuruane (2020-04-16 15:45:30+00:00): Hai ragione. Sono stati uniti due tratti differenti di strada. E' stato ereditato anche il tag surface=compacted: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dcompacted Ciao, Andrea
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 18:11:37+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?  Надеюсь в преть Ваши правки будут менее глобальными. Согласовывайте импорт  и перетегирование с местным сообществом. В противном случае будет откачено
Спасибо за понимание.
eggie (2020-04-14 14:38:18+00:00): je bedoeling zal ongetwijfeld goed zijn , maar het is niet correct om zo water op landuse in te tekenen. dat hoort netjes ingebed te worden in het grasland. 
Bij de stukje bos zie je bv de bomen door het water schijnen. Dat moet dus op een andere manier worden opgelost. 
Je kunt wel op een veilige manier sloten intekenen op een lijnelement waterway=ditch  Dan zie je ook een sloot. Wanneer je meer ervaring hebt kun je het ook in het grasland leggen zodat water en gras/ bos zijn gescheiden.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-04-14 15:50:55+00:00): Het water heb ik hier uitgesneden uit de landuse. Je moet maar eens kijken.
Sloten als waterway=ditch op een lijn gaat ook en is niet zo lastig. Dat andere komt wel. 
MVG,
Eggie
GeoJess (2020-11-23 22:31:10+00:00): Hi  Ségolène Chaptal,

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. It seems like you may have added a profane word to way 791802195. Unless that is the building's actual name, I would recommend for you to please remove the profane name tag.

Thanks,
Jesspher
czubi (2020-04-19 11:26:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7402291045#map=19/51.05499/11.37162&layers=N
Ilmtal-Weinstraße?
eggie (2020-04-14 14:24:55+00:00): Beste... Zou je de moeite willen nemen om je uploads te voorzien van commentaar. 
MVG,
Eggie.
eggie (2020-04-14 14:26:53+00:00): Het si echt niet correct om overal water op het land te mappen. De kaart is zeer kwetsbaar en in hoog tempo van alles toevoegen geeft schade aan de kaart. het gebied van je edits is veel te groot.
Helaas reageer je niet op eerdere waarschuwing. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-04-14 15:11:41+00:00): Ik heb water water uitgesneden als voorbeeld.
Gr Eggie
kartler175 (2020-04-26 08:41:56+00:00): Warum wurde die Linie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135685792 ohne Berücksichtigiung der zugeörigen Relation gelöscht?
skfd (2020-04-14 15:37:15+00:00): Привет! Стадион мы обычно имеем виду большую штуку типа "Старт" или "Олимпийски". А ето сопртивная площадка -- leisure=pitch 😊
Reibert (2020-04-15 16:45:25+00:00): Спасибо, буду знать :)
dmlu (2020-04-14 16:49:00+00:00): Hello,
I noticed you have been modifying a LOT of airports across the globe (and in multiple changesets).
Is this a mechanical edit that was discussed somewhere? What datasource was used to compare the IATA codes?

-> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

dmlu
alester (2020-04-14 17:01:58+00:00): Rather than simply deleting these tags, it would have been better to convert them to better ones where possible. For example, it appears that a lot of these had their ICAO code tagged under the IATA key, so the key just needed to be changed. While they may have been incorrect IATA codes, they were correct codes of some kind, but now you've deleted them entirely. That isn't an improvement.
dmlu (2020-04-14 17:04:06+00:00): Example of a IATA / ICAO mixup: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6439888118/history
VolkerKrause (2020-04-14 17:07:22+00:00): Hi,

these changes merely clean up syntactically invalid IATA codes, ie those not consisting of three upper-case letters. The changes themselves were done manually, although the list of errors was the result of code consuming this data. ~150 cases in total, not all submitted yet though, the remaining ones need closer review (e.g. swapped keys rather than wrong values as such).

I am very sorry if I didn't follow the right procedure for applying those changes, and I will most certainly refrain from further changes until this is clarified. It just seemed more useful to improve things upstream rather than just ignoring this in code.

Volker
VolkerKrause (2020-04-14 17:50:45+00:00): So, how to proceed from here? Should this  changeset as well as the similar #83546052 be reverted?
alester (2020-04-14 19:53:48+00:00): It's up to you. You can either revert all of the changes and then make the necessary corrections, or keep the data as-is and add back any data that had been removed but can be made correct.
dmlu (2020-04-14 21:12:19+00:00): It could also make for a very interesting MapRoulette challenge ;)
VolkerKrause (2020-04-15 15:25:17+00:00): Changeset 83600172 should fix changeset 83546052 by adding FAA codes that were previously wrongly tagged as IATA codes. There are two other patterns in those changes I did not revert/fix: (1) FAA codes in the IATA field, but also already set in the FAA field (2) IATA codes derived from (also syntactically wrong) ICAO codes by dropping the first letter. In case (1) I'd say the deletion of the IATA tag is correct, and in case (2) it does not constitute an information loss while improving the data quality of the IATA field at least (I haven't touched ICAO syntax errors at all yet). Verifying the FAA codes on the FAA website found one that was changed (way 316984088), I updated that accordingly.

I hope I didn't cause even more damage and this matches what you had in mind. If so, I'd do a similar fix for this changeset. Sorry again for the trouble, and thanks for your help!
alester (2020-04-15 15:40:39+00:00): One example that I saw still hasn't been fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1042023589
In that case, a valid ICAO code had been incorrectly tagged in the IATA field, and then subsequently deleted entirely by you. This hasn't been fixed by your latest changeset. This is the kind of thing that needs to be restored, as well as any others in a similar situation. If you aren't sure whether the code is a valid ICAO code or not, I would suggest that restoring the IATA tag as it originally was would be preferred, since the data would then at least be present and someone else can later fix it as necessary. At the very least, some placeholder tag like airport_code=* could be used in order to retain the data.
VolkerKrause (2020-04-15 15:49:08+00:00): Right, but please note that the above mentioned fix was for the second changeset (83546052), not for this one (83540929). The issue you mention is part of this changeset, and therefore not addressed yet. I just thought it would be prudent to verify first I was on the right track before going over all changesets.
VolkerKrause (2020-04-16 15:19:00+00:00): Changeset 83656249 re-adds those removed codes that are actual ICAO/FAA codes for this changeset. What remains now are 5 cases where the codes turned out to be Canadian or Mexican local airport codes. For those I am unsure how to correctly re-add them, using "ref" or the above suggested "airport_code" tag?
dmlu (2020-04-17 20:30:45+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for addressing the "issue" in such a proactive manner and not just reverting everything! I would not use airport_code, as this tag is not used at all [1]. Using the ref key would be better suited, as this tag is widely used :)

[1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=airport_code