piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ethan Colley (2023-05-14 04:37:53+00:00): Gday Woodpeck, "Ruby's Knoll" (should be Rubys because of the apostrophe rules in mountain names in Victoria so I've gotta change that as well) appeared in a map issued to Timbertop students (myself included) in 2018. I can't recall the name of the map or the publisher but part of the map included something relating to 'rogaining'. In regards to where the name's from, I would assume that it is related to one of the original families of the Timbertop region (i.e. Klingsporn, Barclay, Lovicks). Hope that provides some sort of information! :)
woodpeck (2023-05-14 20:14:15+00:00): Problem is, it's now the school wanting it removed so if all we have to go on is "I remember it from a map I was given but I don't remember what that map was or whether indeed it might have been copyrighted" then I fear we'll have to remove it altogether.
Ethan Colley (2023-05-25 03:09:31+00:00): Ah ok, will do.
streckenkundler (2022-06-22 16:53:37+00:00): Hei,

ein (anscheinender) Bug in iD hat hier der Sache einen Streich gespielt. User Öreg arbeitet auschließlich mit iD. iD hat aber die Unschönheit bei bestimmten Aktionen Linien zu trennen, ohne daß der User es will oder mitbekommt. Das ist hier passiert. Hier geht es um die Trennung der Waldbereiche: außenherum ist alles Laubwald und nur der innere Bereich ist (fast) reiner Nadelwald/forst. Ich kenne die Ecke ganz gut. Ich hab das mal revertet und die Geometrien so wiederhergestellt, wie es gedacht und ursprünglich erfasst wurde...

Das ist auch sehr schön auf den CIR-Luftbildern Brandenburgs zu sehen.

Sven
Layft Greater (2024-02-24 08:26:15+00:00): This is a shop
Frans S (2022-06-29 10:32:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122719028
EZRouting (2022-06-22 16:29:46+00:00): #Ezrouting
Diacritic (2022-06-23 09:04:15+00:00): Hi Ethan.

Thanks for your contributions. Would you mind sharing your sources for this change? I cannot find any official reference to this track name, or some of the other names you've added recently.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122719610
Ethan Colley (2022-07-20 15:55:07+00:00): G'day. Unfortunately I've been unable to track down an online copy of the official Timbertop Map that is handed out to students (as I was a past student) and information regarding these tracks and the surrounding region exist only on this hardcopy map. I'll keep you informed if I can find a copy or if it's uploaded online :)
GinaroZ (2022-06-24 14:29:09+00:00): I've removed the address data from the building as it was already tagged on the address nodes :)
mcliquid (2022-06-27 15:32:40+00:00): Hallo marrio, hast du zu der Baustelle eine Quelle mit Informationen zu start_date und construction=*?

Zumal der "name" nicht für die Klassifizierung verwendet wird.
Schaust du dir das bitte nochmal mit einer nachvollziehbaren Quellenangabe an? Danke!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Ahighway%3Dconstruction
mcliquid (2023-01-01 16:29:54+00:00): Gibt es hier nach einem halben Jahr etwas neues?
literan (2022-08-07 20:35:19+00:00): и зачем на proposed исправили?
трасса вовсю строится

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972567495
Woazboat (2022-08-02 15:23:13+00:00): Hi, I think your import has a few problems. A ton of locations are tagged as `place=farm`, which is clearly incorrect and sometimes duplicates already present information (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9839367685)
Woazboat (2022-08-02 15:25:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2399403377 this also isn't really a `natural=bay`
NKA (2022-08-02 16:05:53+00:00): I reviewed it once more now and it seems ok. The farm names are actually name of farms (although some of them may not be productive farms anymore).

In the case of your first example, "Sørland" is both the name of the hamlet and the farm, so not really a duplicate.

For the second example, feel free to change to any tag you see fit. It was not part of the import - I just tried to modify the original incorrect tagging, which was place=locality.
Woazboat (2022-08-02 17:02:48+00:00): Hmmm, I can't see anything on the aerial images that looks like a farm or farmland but I could be wrong.

In other places there's nothing left ( e.g.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9839367684) which is why I retagged it to place=locality. 
abandoned:place=farm would probably be better if there really was farm there at some point, but I didn't think of that at the time. place=farm is supposed to be for farms that are still in use, so I don't think it's the correct tagging for cases like this.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2399403377 should simply be merged with https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7828912
dcapillae (2022-06-22 17:41:51+00:00): "ha cambiado"
kepivar (2022-08-24 09:46:10+00:00): highway=primary is too high
Tyran (2022-10-31 19:46:49+00:00): Moin wilkis!
Im Verlauf der Oyther Straße hast du ein Tag hinzugefügt bzw. abgeändert:
cycleway:both	track
vorher wars:
cycleway	lane

Dort ist ein Radfahrstreifen installiert und ich habe ihn, wie im Wiki beschrieben, mit lane beschrieben?
Warum die Änderung?
Wenn du fragen zu meinen Änderungen hast, schreib mir einfach...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

MFG Tyran
wilkis (2023-01-08 20:57:26+00:00): Hallo Tyran,

habe dies wieder korrigiert.
Das war mein Fehler, ich habe dies in der App StreetComplete falsch mitgedacht.
Allerdings habe ich den Schlüssel cycleway:both:lane (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:cycleway:lane&uselang=de) hinzugefügt.
segubi (2024-08-11 10:50:00+00:00): Ich (bzw. josm) stolpere gerade über die role=route_marker in der Relation "Schnapsidee und Herrengedeck", das ist eigentlich nicht definiert, im Wiki gibt es nur die Rolle guidepost. Diese Rollen sind allerdings sowieso nicht unumstritten, es gibt auch eine Haltung, die Wegweiser nicht in die Routen mit aufzunehmen.
Da es sich bei den von Dir markierten Nodes komplett um "information=guidepost" handelt, habe ich es hier geändert. (Vermutlich gibt es noch andere Relationen, die das betrifft?).
DeFra85 (2024-08-14 09:05:36+00:00): hej hej, es gibt schon einen deutlichen Unterschied zwischen Guidepost und Route_marker.

Guidposts sind die dicken Pfäle mit Fahnen dran, die Entfernungen angeben und die einzelnen Routen ausweisen: https://asc-images.forward-publishing.io/2021/5/7/4e393ab8-8bf5-4ed8-87a2-294a6c741ace.jpeg?w=1024&auto=format
Route_marker dagegen geben im Prinzip nur an, dass IRGENDEINE Route oder mehrere dort entlang führen: https://www.radverkehrsnetz.nrw.de/images/Zwischenwegweiser.gif

Deshalb finde ich es schon zur Orientierung wichtig WAS da an der jeweiligen Ecke steht
segubi (2024-08-14 18:16:25+00:00): Nein, darum ging es nicht. Es geht darum, dass die ROLLE "route_marker" nicht vorgesehen ist in einer Relation.  Natürlich sind information=route_marker und information=guidepost zu unterscheiden.
Ich halte es aber auch nicht für sinnvoll die route_marker in die Routenrelation mit hineinzunehmen, zumal sie nicht einmal ein Routenlogo tragen. Das ist auch keine Information, die irgendwie ausgewertet wird.

Und wie gesagt, die Objekte mit role=route_marker waren sämtlich guideposts, also richtige Vollwegweiser. Vermutlich war es eher ein Versehen. Inhaltlich stimmen wir ja überein.
DeFra85 (2024-08-16 18:18:45+00:00): Ah okay. Dann schmeiß doch einfach alle route_marker, die als fälschliche guidepost aufgeführt werden raus.
Natecgroup (2022-06-22 17:52:02+00:00): گروه ساختمانی ناتک فعالیت خود را به طور غیر متمرکز از بهار سال 1383 در اصفهان آغاز نمود. این گروه در حال حاضر به عنوان بهترین شرکت دکوراسیون داخلی اصفهان و اولین گروه معماری داخلی آکادمیک در اصفهان مشغول فعالیت است همچنین دارای نماینده اجرایی در  تهران و بندرعباس می باشد.
mcliquid (2022-12-06 10:47:34+00:00): Hi, du musst bei Gebäuden (building) kein area=yes setzen. Das wird bereits impliziert :)
Kwatrecht (2022-12-06 16:01:09+00:00): Danke, stimmt. War ein Versehen, wenn ich kopiere :)
Dawid2849 (2022-06-22 21:49:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2990167
GerdP (2022-10-26 06:37:10+00:00): Hi! 
You changed network=rcn to network=lcn for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10578103
I think the old value was correct, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:network#Besonderheit_bei_Fahrradknotenpunktnetzwerken
I've changed it back to rcn here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128066602
martianfreeloader (2022-12-05 11:03:56+00:00): Hi Jaka!

You tagged sidewalk=both on Cesta dveh cesarjev. https://www.osm.org/way/327500693

However, last time I was there (which is a while ago), there was no sidewalk on neither side; just a soft shoulder.

This is also the case on 2020 aerial imagery. Has the situation changed in the meantime or should we correct this?
Jaka Kranjc (2022-12-05 11:20:45+00:00): The road famously got rebuilt last year ...
martianfreeloader (2022-12-05 11:44:10+00:00): Nice! And apparently even with infrastructure for those weirdos called "cyclists"! :-)
JAAS (2022-06-24 00:10:01+00:00): Dear KDavey1228,

First of all, THANK YOU for your contributions to the OSM map through HOT.

I would like to offer my help and provide you with some tips in order to improve your edits a bit while doing such a needed endeavor. We've all been there, starting something new to us, and getting some guidance in time is always worth it, specially as one is at the beginning of it!

Please count on me. I can gladly help you out.

Sincerely,

Jorge /
OSM username: JAAS
_______________________________

Estimad@ KDavey1228,

Primero que nada, GRACIAS por su contribución ingresando datos en el mapa de OSM para HOT.

Quiero aprovechar a ponerme a la orden y ofrecerle algunos consejos para mejorar un poco la loable labor que ha hecho. A todos nos ha tocado iniciarnos en cosas nuevas y nunca caen mal algunas guías, especialmente al empezar!

Por favor cuente conmigo. Con gusto le apoyo.

Atentamente

Jorge / 
OSM username: JAAS
waterced (2022-06-23 09:53:15+00:00): Bonjour! Avez vous vu sur place? Lorsque j'y suis passé, j'ai juste noté que des travaux récents avaient été achevés. Il paraitrait logique que la continuité de la route soit aussi passé en double sens, (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190613745 ), mais je n'en suis pas sûr, l'imagerie aérienne n'est pas à jour.
imagoiq (2022-06-23 18:25:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement, j'ai fait la modification un peu vite. Je passe souvent là, mais j'ai un petit doute, je vérifierai sur place la semaine prochaine.
Дымков Артём Денисович (2022-06-22 21:11:42+00:00): Мэр Москвы подписал указ о создании возле Посольства США площади Донецкой Народной Республики и изменении адреса самого посольства: https://www.1tv.ru/news/2022-06-22/431729-territoriya_vozle_posolstva_ssha_v_moskve_stala_ploschadyu_donetskoy_narodnoy_respubliki?. Если Вы знали об этом, напишите пожалуйста, почему Вы отменили мои правки в этом месте
literan (2022-06-23 06:08:25+00:00): почему я их отменил, я написал в комментарии к вашей правке, которая пришла вам на почту
Дымков Артём Денисович (2022-06-23 10:21:15+00:00): «Также, не надо проставлять выдуманные адреса зданиям. Никто адреску не менял там пока». Между прочим, о смене адреса сказано даже на сайте мэра и правительства Москвы: https://www.mos.ru/news/item/108720073/. Самое главное: «Посольство США в России получило новый официальный адрес. Теперь дипломатическая миссия располагается по адресу: Российская Федерация, город Москва, внутригородская территория муниципальный округ Пресненский, площадь Донецкой Народной Республики, дом 1, строения 1–9…старые адреса объектов аннулировали»
literan (2022-06-23 13:14:39+00:00): это другое дело. Адреса в Москве присваивает не мэр, а Департамент городского имущества, с занесением в адресный реестр. 
https://www.mos.ru/pgu/common/doc.php?id=7700000000172940767

На вчерашний вечер в реестре красовались старые адреса.

Это уже достаточное основание для смены адрески. Но границы площади от балды рисовать все равно не надо. Оставьте точкой.
AvantaR (2022-06-22 19:40:35+00:00): Paczkomat LGR02N, nie LGR08M.
felipeeugenio (2022-06-22 23:14:31+00:00): Hola
es Ugenia o Eugenia?
saludos
InsertUser (2022-06-26 22:57:23+00:00): If possible please try to save between editing widely spaced areas. A large number of people can get notified with big bounding boxes if the bounding box crosses  the area they pay attention to.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-25 11:32:57+00:00): Hello SamVanDyke,
You've added data based on "local knowledge" in the San Francisco bay area, various places around Los Angeles and Las Vegas.  Whilst some people do have excellent memories, your use of this as a source does seem to push credibility somewhat.  Are there any other sources that you are using?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
habi (2022-06-22 20:38:31+00:00): Die genaue Lage im Gebäude müsste noch vor Ort geklärt werden.
adrianojbr (2022-06-23 02:29:39+00:00): Olá, pedroagdf! Muito boas suas edições. Apenas uma observação quanto ao telefone que deve ser no padrão +55 XX XXXX-XXXX (com algumas variações dependendo do mapeador: usa ou não hífen, etc.). Abraço!
IsaiasMdP (2022-06-29 13:13:11+00:00): Bonjour Christophe,

Avec la mise à double sens de ce tronçon de la rue Sarrette en impasse, la bande cyclable a été effacée. J'ai donc supprimé l'élément qui n'existe plus sur le terrain. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010244554

Bonne continuation

Isaias
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 20:04:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2552554731/history

Have you meant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcar_rental here?
jmapb (2023-03-20 00:51:42+00:00): Good question! Looks like I may have changed my mind halfway through, from shop=car to amenity=car_rental.

This is a place that mainly deals in long-term car leases. The customer doesn't ever own the car, but may keep it for years. It's functionally like shop=car, but legally more like a rental.

Haven't found any discussion of this topic in the mailing list, forums, or wiki. But taginfo shows a few uses of service:vehicle:leasing=yes, so I've tagged that along with shop=car.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 06:12:39+00:00): amenity=car_rental is rather for short term car rental (few days) while leasing (for years or months) is rather treated similarly to buying but with different legal structure and built-in loan

I asked on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dcar#leasing-only https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dcar_rental#Leasing to confirm it
RicoElectrico (2022-06-29 16:26:53+00:00): Cześć, trzeba też oprócz bramy dodać atrybut dostępu na fragmencie drogi.
filips95 (2022-07-04 20:31:48+00:00): Cześć, zgodnie z sugestią dokonałem zmian w tej edycji: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123206870
blackboxlogic (2022-09-19 13:33:13+00:00): Hi, seems like you're tagging individual strips of parking spots inside parking lots instead of tagging the whole parking lot. That's more detailed but it's not what I'd expect from the tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
Which describes spots along roads, not individuals sections of a parking lot.
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-06-24 03:49:57+00:00): a carris metropolitana não foi implementada na margem norte, a edição deve corresponder à realidade, peço então que corrijas a informação que alteraste.
FasterTracker (2022-06-24 04:08:30+00:00): Saudações!

Como o utilizador DiogoBaptista98 referiu a Carris Metropolitana ainda não entrou em operação na região que mapeaste a nova rota (Lote 1). Podes ler no comunicada da TML que a operação da Carris Metropolitana na região foi adiada para 2023. ( https://www.tmlmobilidade.pt/en/comunicacao/noticias/carris-metropolitana-avanca-em-almada-seixal-e-sesimbra/ )


Sublinho que a filosofia do OSM dá prioridade ao que existe no terreno. Daí o consenso da comunidade relativamente à Carris Metropolitana é mapear as rotas quando efetivamente estiverem em operação plena.

Se quiseres falar com a comunidade sobre esta questão (e não só), podes fazê-lo através do canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa ( https://t.me/OSMPortugal )

Cumprimentos, FT
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:24:04+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
Glassman (2022-06-23 17:02:46+00:00): #TIP: traffice signs are tagged as traffic_sign=maxspeed + maxspeed=25 mph. Or better is to add maxspeed=25 mph to the street.

Can you review your edit and update it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122729589
Glassman (2022-06-23 17:03:07+00:00): #TIP: traffice signs are tagged as traffic_sign=maxspeed + maxspeed=25 mph. Or better is to add maxspeed=25 mph to the street.

Can you review your edit and update it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122729589
Coloradohusky (2022-06-25 03:37:37+00:00): It's one of those traffic signs that shows you your speed as you're driving by, and flashes if you're going too fast (however, nowhere on it does it state the speed limit is 25 MPH) - is traffic_sign=maxspeed still what I should do?
Glassman (2022-06-25 16:18:40+00:00): I think you want highway=speed_display See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_display for more information.
Trevor_1 (2022-06-22 21:26:45+00:00): *The NearMap imagery is more recent.
Glassman (2022-06-23 17:08:15+00:00): #TIP: Instead of adding the address to the street, just place a node on top of the house with the address information. 

I removed the address info from the street.

Let me know if you have any questions. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122730100
Glassman (2022-06-23 17:08:15+00:00): #TIP: Instead of adding the address to the street, just place a node on top of the house with the address information. 

I removed the address info from the street.

Let me know if you have any questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122730100
rab (2022-06-27 18:47:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666502520
 not a residential area!
what is apple doing here?
LeNetsi (2022-06-28 20:56:16+00:00): Hi rab! Thank you for pointing this out, I went ahead and reclassified the road to service, have a good day!
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:18:25+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
mariotomo (2022-06-25 19:32:49+00:00): hola, bienvenido a OSM, gracias por pedir "revisión" de la contribución.

lo que podrías mejorar es en el uso del campo "name" para describir el objeto. este es un error de los más comunes entre los nuevos maperos.

yo creo que deberías poner la extensión del conjunto, poniéndole etiqueta de community_centre. si es un conjunto confesional, quizás podrías buscar entre place_of_worship, o como uso religioso de la tierra.

los edificios con función de dormitorio, no sabría. puedes buscar en el wiki, o preguntar en la comunidad.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
Minh Nguyen (2025-11-05 08:42:55+00:00): Reverted in changeset 174229200: short_name is for conventional abbreviations (e.g., AP abbreviations). USPS/GPO state codes go in ref.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-31 17:02:12+00:00): reverted
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-07-14 18:02:25+00:00): vias removidas!
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:20:01+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
Commodoortje (2022-07-02 04:18:50+00:00): Goedemorgen Teek,
Wacht (weer) even met editen, het gaat niet goed namelijk.
Je verwijdert (wellicht onbewust) veel landuse vlakken weg.
Dit is het 2e grote gebied waar je alle landuse verwijdert. 
Je weet ongetwijfeld dat je kleine gebieden kunt verbeteren, en gelijk aan kunt passen naar de juiste landuse.
Ik vraag me af waarom je deze werkwijze weer inzet.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/yakp4xmok8v638k/2022-07-02_06-17-43.jpg?raw=1
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-06-24 03:55:13+00:00): linhas de autocarro são criadas a partir de relações inseridas nas vias já existentes, nunca criando uma nova linha para uma carreira, por isso peço que revejas a wiki de como o fazer e que revertas a tua edição
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:21:14+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
Leo Slager (2022-06-23 10:41:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.