piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VA00 (2020-03-20 06:27:13+00:00): Może lepiej to  oznaczyć po prostu jako wąwóz natural=gully
pan_borsuk (2020-03-20 14:20:52+00:00): to rzeczywiście dobra propozycja 👍
i tak to jest raczej miejsce dla wtajemniczonych bo nie ma na razie żadnego połączenia od zamku.

patrzę na cieniowanie na geoportalu i ta ścieżynka którą wtedy wyznaczyłem idzie idealnie dnem właśnie takiego gulliku ;) i rozgałęzia się w dość wyraźnym miejscu #zwrotakcji
robert (2018-11-17 16:01:06+00:00): Please do not move road ref=s to within the road name. Allow the renderer to make a decision about this. Someone's going to have to come and undo all of this now.
JayCBR (2018-11-17 19:39:47+00:00): V5 etc its a part of the name, you cant see one without the other

the correct tag is loc_ref because its not a national road ref..the only problem is nobody can see it
robert (2018-11-17 19:58:26+00:00): Whether to show it or not is the render's decision. I've seen plenty of people refer to MK roads as just their name, "Grafton Street" etc.
mavl (2019-02-23 16:34:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
CRCulver (2018-11-09 02:39:50+00:00): Hello Mihai, I see that you have returned to OSM editing, but you still are not providing any sources for your edits. For example, what is the origin of all these Romanian-language names for Bulgarian cities? If you cannot provide a source, I am afraid I will have to revert your recent changes.
SomeoneElse (2018-11-10 09:47:29+00:00): @Mihai Mandea Yes - we will need to revert at least some of your edits unless you can provide sources.  
For previous questions that the community has asked you see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4648211 .  See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mihai%20Mandea/blocks .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2018-11-10 09:47:53+00:00): @Mihai Mandea Da - va trebui să revenim la cel puțin câteva editări dacă nu puteți furniza surse.
Pentru întrebările anterioare pe care le-a cerut comunitatea, http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4648211. Consultați și https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mihai%20Mandea/blocks.
Toate cele bune,
Andy Townsend, în numele Grupului de lucru OSM privind datele.
maraf24 (2018-11-09 22:36:58+00:00): Na pewno w dyskusji na forum nie padł taki wniosek, tym bardziej, że w ogóle nie zostało tam wspomniane, że chodzi o stary most.
Istnienie secondary równoległej do trunk nie ma sensu.
Anakil (2018-11-09 12:26:23+00:00): Bonjour debonra,
Merci de ta contribution ! Juste un petit conseil : essaye d'ajouter le nom de rue (et potentiellement le code postal) quand tu ajoute une addresse à un bâtiment (et donc, ne pas se limiter au numéro). Car en Belgique, une adresse a toujours besoin de ces 3 éléments (avec le numéro) pour être complète. ;-)

Happy mapping,
Anakil
OpenStreetMap Belgium
debonra (2018-11-09 14:21:48+00:00): Je suis un petit cours sur OSM. Je pense que dans la 2ème session de ce cours, j'apprendrai comment grouper des maisons dans une même rue. Si la rue change de nom, il ne faut pas changer l'adresse dans chacune des maisons... :-)
mavl (2019-02-23 16:34:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
viloan (2018-11-06 13:17:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-11-06 14:31:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-11-06 14:37:27+00:00): Op een voetpad hoeft geen extra tag bicycle, motor_vehicle=no en ook niet footway=sidewalk. Die tags kunnen eraf. Van het fietspad heb je een onverhard pad gemaakt. Dat routeert wel voor fietsers, maar niet van harte, want er is geen surface tag surface=? paved, asphalt oid.
Staat hier geen bord fietspad? Je zegt zelf dat het een fietspad is? Dat is ook default voor voetgangers.
eggie (2018-11-06 14:48:16+00:00): Het fietspad dat je hebt verwijderd is een Verplicht fietspad
highway=cycleway
moped=no
mofa=yes
traffic_sign=NL:G11
sidewalk=left
Ik zal de tags herstellen. 
Mocht het bord verplicht fietspad zijn weggehaald dan hoor ik het graag.
De tag voetpad links zit dus opgesloten in het fietspad zelf. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-06 14:56:06+00:00): 'k Zie op de laatste luchtfoto van aug 2018 dat het voetpad aan de noordkant ligt en dat de tuning_circle ook aangepast is. Ik pas nog wat aan.
abakus_uploader (2018-11-06 23:30:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Stalker61 (2018-11-06 15:20:23+00:00): Ваша правка удалена из-за копирования адресов с яндекса, что прямо запрещено в osm
ff5722 (2018-11-06 19:34:17+00:00): Why did you delete it? It was closed down?
Mia Liou (2018-11-06 13:43:33+00:00): 這裡是新開的路，可能還會變動，但舊路已經不見了，應該要刪掉。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-11-15 08:04:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64516990 where the changeset comment is: Reverting unsourced edits around Bulgaria.  All attempts to contact the mapper have failed
Anakil (2018-11-09 11:57:29+00:00): Bonjour jfonda,

Merci de tes contributions, juste une petite erreur (ou oubli): tu avais dessiné la chapelle sans mettre d'attributs ("tags") sur le polygone (et tu avais mis l'information chapelle dans le nom sur un point à côté). J'ai corrigé le tout en plaçant l'information sur le polygone du bâtiment directement. ;-)

Happy mapping
Anakil
OpenStreetMap Belgium
Stalker61 (2018-11-06 15:14:40+00:00): Ваша правка удалена из-за копирования адресов с яндекса, что прямо запрещено в osm
Stalker61 (2018-11-06 15:14:26+00:00): Ваша правка удалена из-за копирования адресов с яндекса, что прямо запрещено в osm
Howpper (2018-11-06 13:53:29+00:00): Put relation around Lake Pend Oreille
mavl (2019-02-23 16:34:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Leo Slager (2018-11-07 18:06:33+00:00): Zoek even in de wiki naar de definitie van een park, dan zul je zien dat iets zelden een park is volgens de definitie die OSM hiervoor gebruikt. Het wordt ook vaak misbruikt om het spel PokomonGo te beînvloeden. Parken liggen bij ons dus onder een vergrootglas.
Ik verander het even in landuse=grass.
Dus dat is wat je op de grond ziet.
Leisure=park ligt daar dan als een doorzichtige deken over al die landuse heen en geeft dan de functie weer van het complete gebied.
eggie (2018-11-07 22:46:06+00:00): Nog even een vlak highway pedestrian , area =yes toegevoegd en wat bomen. Uitleg per PB
eggie (2018-11-08 10:40:15+00:00): area = yes was niet ge-upload . nu wel. Zal wel een vlak worden nu.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-07 02:08:15+00:00): Your footways in Rotary Park should be highway=path.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64231499
Kirdro (2018-11-09 19:10:51+00:00): The trails in Rotary Park are pedestrian walking trails. Historically, they were roads, but the city has since gated them off, removed the tarmac, and narrowed the trails.  (still learning, so if they are indeed incorrect, let me know and I'll change them.)
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-11 05:41:02+00:00): Arguably that could be highway=track or highway=service, surface=unpaved, motor_vehicle=private.
Tomas Straupis (2018-11-06 15:37:34+00:00): Why this change? It makes it more difficult to extract value - "voltage". I will add voltage tag back as it is used when creating maps.
mueschel (2018-11-06 15:44:43+00:00): Hi,
you invented a new tag here ("voltage:full"), the ones I used are very common. The input voltage is tagged as voltage:primary or voltage-high and the output voltage is tagged as voltage:secondary or voltage-low. 

'voltage' is not very useful in combination with substations because it doesn't specify whether it is input or output voltage.
Tomas Straupis (2018-11-06 16:13:03+00:00): Here in Lithuania voltage is the only necessary tag. Electrical system organisation maps state voltage for substations, and voltage is used when creating topographic maps.
Tomas Straupis (2018-11-06 16:21:15+00:00): The point of "voltage:full" was just to avoid deleting information which arcth added (I do not know his source).
mavl (2019-02-23 16:34:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-23 16:34:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-11-14 15:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-07 09:54:15+00:00): Hallo roter-stern, beim Anbinden des Waldweges an die L 3057 hast du einen üblen Zickzack erzeugt: https://ibb.co/g4fWw87
Router können auf so was empfindlich reagieren, weil sie eine enge Doppelkurve sehen. Bitte aufpassen :)
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-11-06 14:34:49+00:00): Ik heb een review nodig voor de vlakken. Mag ik dit zo in kaart brengen met multipolygon? Ik weet wel zeker dat het accuraat is zoals het er staat.
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-11-06 14:35:28+00:00): Er is niet zoveel bosbouw als in de edits van jaren terug stond. Bosbouw overlapt ook niet het voetpad.
Cyclono (2018-11-06 16:24:30+00:00): Hi, hier moet eggie naar kijken, hoe is goed met de relaties. Parkeerplaatsen mappen we meestal wanneer deze voor public bedoeld is. Dus voor winkels, kantoren, etc. Parkeerplaatsen in woongebieden mappen we meestal niet. Dat is mijn inbreng, de rest is eggie ;)
eggie (2018-11-06 17:00:53+00:00): De mp's kloppen. Het wandelpad zal niet verder routeren, want dat heeft na de area geen vervolg meer.
Groet,
Eggie
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-11-06 23:19:57+00:00): Bedankt voor jullie input.
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:20:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:16:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:16:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:19:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:20:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:20:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:16:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:19:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:19:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:19:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mosstreet (2018-11-06 20:46:03+00:00): 220 вольт торгует не садовыми принадлежностями, или ставьте правильный или удалю. Так же не советую ставить посреди дома, закрываете номер, ставьте там где вход в магазин
literan (2018-11-07 07:33:28+00:00): Это бот, он не читает сообщения (см. метатеги выше). По поводу этих раскрутчиков rocketdata нужно писать сразу в DWG, других способов нет
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:17:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:18:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
abrensch (2019-02-23 14:43:13+00:00): Hallo ewai1996,

ich hab' das hier zurueckgesetzt, weil es sich erledigt haben müsste. Kannst Du prüfen?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
mavl (2019-02-23 16:34:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-23 16:34:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
marcknj (2018-12-19 17:03:32+00:00): it´s not insufficient, because it is a protected area
mueschel (2018-11-17 13:51:19+00:00): Hi,
you're using some uncommon tags here like
"ptx_subroute_uid-direction". Could you explain what they mean?

Thanks
Jan
r~~~ (2018-11-18 06:42:40+00:00): Hi. Thanks for raising this. I am using only one uncommon tag here. This is probably due to my lack of understanding how to best record it. To be precise, the tag combines the SubRouteUID and (Subroute)Direction fields than are available from https://ptx.transportdata.tw/MOTC for this bus route, and uniquely identifies it there. I do not see that any of the common tags from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses are suitable for this job, but I do believe this reference will be useful in the future. For example, you can automatically detect a mismatch when the MOTC data gets updated (NB: the information at MOTC is not sufficiently accurate across the board to warrant automatic transfer into OSM). Furthermore, I did not want to introduce inconsistencies in tag semantics with other bus routes in OSM for Kaohsiung, partly because it is not clear what they do mean elsewhere and where the data comes from. If there is a better place to discuss this, please let me know. Best, r.
mueschel (2018-11-18 11:12:31+00:00): Hi,
these seem to be some official reference numbers. The usual way to tag those is a key like "ref:XYZ" (whether this should be ref:MOTC is up to you to decide).

I'd also suggest to combine the two keys to a common one - "ptx_subroute_uid-direction" and "ptx_subroute_uid" can share the same key: If it contains the direction can easily be seen by the structure of the number, if it contains '-', then it contains the direction.
Stalker61 (2018-11-06 17:04:30+00:00): Все уважаемый. Вы уже начали откровенно вандалить данные.
Правку откатываю
eggie (2018-11-06 16:11:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-11-06 16:14:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-11-06 16:19:26+00:00): Waarschijnlijk door schuiven met de kaart  loopt het boterdiep nu dwars door de bebouwing. 
Svp dus schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus. Verder taggen we winkels bij op de bestaande adresnodes van het Kadaster.. anders komen adressen 2x voor..
Dit was je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64234368
eggie (2018-11-06 16:21:01+00:00): Ik kijk even of ik wat kan herstellen.
eggie (2018-11-06 16:40:17+00:00): Het boterdiep hersteld en de info naar de adresnode verplaatst. De openingstijden kloppen niet volgens de taggingsafspraken binnen OSM
Wellicht even hier kijken.

openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Pavel Bokr (2018-11-30 22:14:27+00:00): Proc byla provedena zmena highway na residential u polnich cest?

Why change to higway residential on ways for agricultural purposes?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-11-07 13:11:08+00:00): What is your source for all this road adjustments?
nemca (2018-11-09 12:07:59+00:00): Information from the driver. If you are familiar with the area and it's not correct, revert the changes, please.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-11-10 10:10:46+00:00): How are you getting so many information from divers across Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia?

What is you method for checking whatever reports are correct?
Matthew Darwin (2018-11-07 15:01:22+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for your changes.  

Somehow you moved 1 Springdale Crescent onto Sheahan Crescent.

I will fix this.
Equinox_Shift (2018-11-07 16:21:01+00:00): Oh my, yes, likely when I was adding something, I touched a marker and dragged it by accident.

Sorry I missed that. Thank you.

Soon, I'm going to find some walking paths and mark those too.
Matthew Darwin (2018-11-07 17:32:46+00:00): Great. If you want to chat with other local mappers, the best place is to join slack.  Invite link is at  https://www.osmcanada.ca/about.html  (#ottawa channel)

We also have a project going on related to paths now: http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/139 in case you are interested in that.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2018-11-07 14:23:06+00:00): This changeset is now reverted in changeset 64263100 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64263100>.

Please note that the information you added is not a stop name, but rather a list of bus numbers that stop there.

This information however, belongs and already written in the `description` field, which is normally user-viewable in the application by tapping/hovering over the POI.
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description>

Appending bus list to the stop name just to make it display directly on the application you use is a practice of "Tagging for the Renderer" <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer>. It is not a proper way to contribute to OpenStreetMap, since it broke other applications that make different uses of the same data.

In this specific case, you are breaking OSM public transport map's ability to display a correct stop name.
eggie (2018-11-06 16:20:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.