piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
David Reik (2020-05-02 12:22:39+00:00): I struggled with what the best approach would be to present the pertinent information in this case for people who want to visit the very-hard-to-to-get-to Humaston Brook Falls.  I wanted to show a doable bushwhack route.  Many routes through the woods with no trails look doable on a map, but, on the ground, one finds that there are cliffs, swamps, thickets, or other obstacles.  I chose my route back from the falls as the best, although it was longer than my route out.  My route out had too much wetland, and mountain laurel thickets.  I thought the name, "2020-4-30 bushwhack route (no path)" was sufficiently unambiguous so that people would know not to expect a trail.
elgolfo (2020-05-02 07:38:02+00:00): Hi arty4u,

die Schranke sieht gut aus, sehe da keinen Fehler. Habe es auch nochmal mit JOSM geprüft. Auch da alles gut.
Du könntest die gemappten Wege noch um smoothness=*, surface=* und ggf. width=* erweitern. Das wird von einigen Routern ausgewertet und ist z.B. für Radfahrer sehr hilfreich.

Grüße
Moritz
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84499028
muralito (2020-05-02 20:31:55+00:00): Hola,

Cabañas alpinas no hay en Uruguay porque no hay montañas y no hay necesidad. ¿Que fue lo que quisiste mapear?
user_5359 (2020-05-02 05:25:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/4830261042/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
user_8466505 (2020-05-02 08:33:57+00:00): Oh, I did? Sorry about that. Thanks for reposition the node. I really appreciate it!
kapazao (2025-12-08 18:15:41+00:00): Hola, ¿puedes explicar esta "central hidroeléctrica"?
La información relacionada en fuentes no indica nada sobre esto o ya no está disponible.
No encuentro información alguna sobre una central hidroeléctrica en la zona de la presa, que normalmente aparece en la Agencia Andaluza de la Energía.
¿Podrías dar alguna referencia o datos actuales sobre esto?
Un saludo
ferpg81 (2025-12-08 19:04:26+00:00): Hola! Me queda lejos esto, hace tiempo que tampoco paso por la zona. Veo que tengo un fixme en la turbina que precisamente dice que es una minihidráulica, y los enlaces de "source" están rotos, pero buscando por el pdf directamente, encuentro nuevo enlace:

https://www.spancold.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/V_ITIPB_20160203_02_Luis_Fernandez.pdf

Ahí ya se menciona que tiene producción eléctrica ("Producción eléctrica (3,4 GWh/año)"). Pero creo que no es el uso principal de la presa, ese es abastecer de agua... Entiendo que la producción eléctrica únicamente será cuando haya mucha agua, que por esa zona, no es lo más habitual, sobre todo en verano.

Saludos.
kapazao (2025-12-09 07:00:05+00:00): Al no existir información concreta sobre una central hidroeléctrica considero que es mejor eliminarla del mapa tal y como está ahora, ya que se ha usado una relación que tampoco es correcta englobando partes que son más bien de la presa.

En caso de disponer de otra información más precisa sobre una central aquí se podrá añadir de otra forma más correcta.

Gracias por la respuesta y un saludo
ferpg81 (2025-12-09 15:54:06+00:00): Ok, como veas mejor. Hace mucho que hice esto, pero la relación seguramente incluiría los elementos que vienen siendo parte en cualquier hidroeléctrica (incluyendo la presa), creo que venía más o menos bien explicado en wiki... Pero tampoco sé si hay alguna convención al respecto. Gracias por tu revisión. Saludos!
SomeoneElse (2020-05-04 13:39:49+00:00): Hello - please don't add test data to OpenStreetMap!  I've deleted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7472700185/history .  If you want to experiment with the editors, you can do so over at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (an exact copy of the main site apart from the map display).  
Best Regards,
Andy
naveenpf (2020-06-29 14:43:30+00:00): Wrong edit 
Thodhupuzha taluk administrative tag was removed.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 11:18:48+00:00): Yeah I thought about handling these this manner, but I’m concerned about not properly representing a main line.
HubMiner (2021-12-06 03:28:24+00:00): Hello, the opening_hours rule overlap, could you check?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7472771094/history
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 11:32:51+00:00): Aside from the issue of main line, some consider that a `=trunk` Or `=motorway` can begin before the sign.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 12:34:32+00:00): U-turn slip follows higher classification like any other `*_link`
chachafish (2020-05-02 10:50:37+00:00): Hello :) Why did you delete all of these paths and water features? Thank you
chachafish (2020-05-04 04:39:26+00:00): Dear Scrapper81, I’ve tried to contact you, but you have not responded to changeset comments and you’ve continued to make edits in this area. Thank you for your interest in adding to the map. Some of your work in this golf course has been reverted to its previous state. In openstreetmap we are free to modify previous edits, but we do not simply delete the work of others and replace that work with our own. As much as possible, we try to keep the history of the work by modifying what is already mapped. Please read the OSM Good Practice Wiki in the link below. In the future, please respond to changeset comments and please follow the Good Practice Wiki. Thank you and good luck with your edits. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 11:35:14+00:00): That section is considered Sham among Rd (West Kowloon D1)
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 11:40:21+00:00): Please check that this section is uncovered
aceman444 (2020-05-02 08:21:21+00:00): Hi, what is the point of this change?
The park is not named "en: Srholcov park", but "Park Antona Srholca". If you wanted to add English name, the tag would be "name:en", instead of "name', thus it would be name:en="Srholcov park". But this park probably does not have an official English name, and it surely isn't Srholcov park, which is still in Slovak.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 11:47:16+00:00): Actually if you want to model it this method, the entering `=motorway_link` should start at the diverge from exit to Hung Chi Rd. This raises the issue of directionality, as the exiting direction won’t be restricted.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 11:54:17+00:00): It is possible for non-`=moroway_link` To be treated differently, with the `=trunk_link` beginning at the  interchange merge/diverge. This considers  the terminating road as the main line beginning there.
BCNorwich (2020-05-02 07:44:21+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
As you say this is on the OS map, it's a footpath therefore cycles are not allowed as a right. Thus bicycle=yes is incorrect. Permissive cycling would have to be by express permission of the landowner.
Regards Bernard.
PhilAck (2020-05-02 18:40:05+00:00): Correct Bernard
I thought I had left as Unspecified.
I think you or someone else has change it to No which is correct.

Phil
abakus_uploader (2020-05-02 22:30:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
BCNorwich (2020-05-02 07:55:43+00:00): Hi, Great to see more paths added to the map. You tag this track as permissive but that does not inform the public as to what access is permitted, perhaps you might add foot=permissive. It might be more accurate to tag access=agriculture, foot=permissive.

Regards Bernard.
PhilAck (2020-05-02 18:37:08+00:00): Hi Bernard
Yes this is a great new (ish, few years now) path. 
As far as I can see I have put:-
Foot: Permissive
Motor Vehicles: No
Bicycles: Permissive
Horses: Permissive

I see, I think its the All=Permissive that is the problem, updated.

Phil
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 11:59:57+00:00): Diverted route does t necessarily have to follow the higher claasification
BCNorwich (2020-05-02 09:06:18+00:00): Hi, The definitive line of Way: 329931833 at the north east may well go through a house swimming pool and gardens but that is not necessarily ground truth. By all means mark the definitive path line but mark also the obstructions so folk know they can't walk there, or tag as highway=no on that section. It would also be great if any alternative way is used to overcome the obstructions.

I've amended several path lines, water lines, woods lines and joined crossing highways.

Regards Bernard
PhilAck (2020-05-02 18:32:04+00:00): Hi Bernard
Many thanks for the feedback.
I did not create 329931833, but I have corrected it.
Regards
Phil
eteb3 (2020-12-24 21:52:24+00:00): Hi Phil
Just checking some of the edits in this changeset. At Nine Bridges you added an unmarked crossing (node www.openstreetmap.org/node/7472909446) which is on a path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/799026507 running from dyke on the west side of the bridge. On the map it continues across the road and along the dyke on the east side of the bridge.
But.. I was up there recently and this doesn't appear to be the route of the path - I had to leap the fence to meet the levee at that (iirc) point. I'd have the path join the track at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372879577, turn south down the road, then along Mile Drove about 15 metres where there's a kissing gate into the field on the left to skirt the intermittent waterway and then rejoin the dyke.
But I may have misunderstood your edit - thoughts welcome! I see some of Bernard's edits on that path, too, so he may have useful things to say.
Happy Christmas one and all.
Edward
The actual route
PhilAck (2020-12-25 14:44:45+00:00): Thanks Edward.
You are correct. I have updated, though I do struggle a little with it. It is a bit better now.
Merry Christmas and happy new year.

Phil
eteb3 (2020-12-25 18:50:08+00:00): Thanks very much. At https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96431845 I've tweaked a bit around the river area itself. I also had a go at realigning the fp on the north bank where it crosses the road, but foolishly: I realised I may have it wrong, tried to reverse my edit, but find I can't bc one of the nodes is 'part of a relation'. This is what you had put 8 months ago: https://tinyurl.com/y8ler99w 
At some point would you mind checking the north bank path (when the image tiles update) and see if I've got it right? I didn't actually walk that path, just went west of the road to inspect the little weir in the north channel. 
So don't worry about your struggles! OSM is iterative. Very few edits make the map objectively worse, and it's a process of constant improvement. Happy mapping.
elgolfo (2020-05-02 07:54:51+00:00): Hi Mig369,

alles gut soweit. Ich habe nur  protection_title:pl zu protection_title geändert, einen Namen spendiert und die unklaren seamark tags entfernt.

Details hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84509051

Viele Grüße
Moritz
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84507464
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 12:03:45+00:00): It is worth considering the entire Airport Rd, but again this hits the issue of directionality
elgolfo (2020-05-02 09:48:27+00:00): Hi km2bp, 
I reviewed your changeset as you've requested it.
It looks good. 
I would add smoothness=*, surface=*, tracktype=* to highway=track. These tags are considered by routers and especially helpful for cyclists and hikers.
Bunkers, which are not actively used anymore I tag as abandoned:military=bunker, location=underground, building=bunker. Layer=-1 I would remove.

Regards
Moritz
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84508056
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-12 06:51:43+00:00): You seem to have a strong desire to get rid of everything.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 12:06:36+00:00): There’s is no need to delete it. Just re-tag.
user_5359 (2020-05-02 09:45:25+00:00): Hello! You use same unknown keys (starting with uppercase letter). Please have also on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:airmark%3Dbeacon
elgolfo (2020-05-02 09:30:49+00:00): --- 
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84508685
PT-53 (2020-05-03 04:48:11+00:00): Hallo YukonTramp,
für diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/799034074/history
wird im OSM-Inspector ein Hinweis "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.87291&lat=47.79662&zoom=17&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-05-03 04:51:08+00:00): PS: Noch eine Linie ohne Merkmale:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/799034071/history
PT-53 (2020-05-10 05:51:19+00:00): erledigt
chachafish (2020-05-02 10:40:37+00:00): Hello, why did you make this a no right turn restriction? It looks like to me this is for trucks only
swathiku (2020-05-04 08:44:51+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the incorrect turn restriction. I've made the correction under the changeset(84608877). Will ensure not to repeat such errors again.
Regards,
swathiku.
chachafish (2020-05-04 12:45:51+00:00): Thank you :)
felipeeugenio (2020-05-02 21:19:24+00:00): Estimado Pebblestone no es ripio. saludos
chachafish (2020-05-02 10:36:22+00:00): Hello :) Why did you delete the pond here? Thank you
eggie (2020-05-02 08:27:04+00:00): Dag Olaf,

Je vraagt om een review..
Begin nooit met access=no  ..Denk beter verwijderen. 
(Staat er een bord Verboden toegang?)
bicycle en foot = yes is default op een pad. Als er geen brommers mogen komen kun je moped en mofa=no taggen. 
permit moet je maar eens opzoeken in de wiki wat daar mee wordt bedoeld.
Beter is het om emergency=yes te taggen op de Zeepromenade.
Dat zuidelijke pad is wonderlijk getagd. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=official
ben ik niet eerder tegen gekomen. 
Hier ook access=no? 
Je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84509217

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-02 08:28:44+00:00): aanvulling.... access=no laat de paden ook slecht renderen. Het is een totaal verbod. Er is dan altijd iets aan de hand. Kijk maar eens goed. 
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-02 10:06:27+00:00): access= heb ik vast verwijderd bij het pad vanaf het ziekenhuis ivm routering en rendering. Mochten er daadwerkelijk borden Verboden toegang zijn geplaatst dan hoor ik dat graag. 
MVG,
Eggie
UW Maddie (2020-05-02 08:48:33+00:00): additional source used: "bing bird's eye"
forgot to add it in the submission
UW Maddie (2020-09-02 09:58:40+00:00): bird's eye is not allowed so objects only visible with it have been deleted
CjMalone (2020-05-02 08:19:42+00:00): I used Esri World Imagery to add this petrol station
fkv (2021-05-07 08:55:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104303681 where the changeset comment is: revert 84510222
damjang (2020-05-02 09:35:18+00:00): Please revert your changes with slovenian names removal. As I already say you in a message we map names as they are written on phisical street tables on the road. So bilingual names have to remain!
damjang (2020-05-02 09:38:27+00:00): For the suburbs, slovenian names are present where there are historically more present slovenian minority and/or there are slovenian schools and organizations.
user_6631989 (2020-05-02 13:54:54+00:00): Buongiorno, come mai queste modifiche. I nomi in sloveno vanno lasciati. Sollecito il ripristino delle modifiche
fkv (2021-05-07 08:36:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104302225 where the changeset comment is: revert 84511638
eggie (2020-05-02 09:35:42+00:00): Dag wvd6.. Maar als hier geen gebouw is waarom dan een gebouw intekenen. 
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2020-05-02 10:14:16+00:00): Inderdaad.
amenity=bus_station is voldoende.
building=yes hoort daar niet bij.
Ook layer=-1 hoort daar niet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbus_station
Ik pas het even aan.
wvd6519 (2020-05-02 10:27:58+00:00): Ah my bad, dat veld over het hoofd gezien. Layer is inderdaad ook niet goed. Bedankt voor het fixen!
Kin Sapalot (2020-05-02 11:28:30+00:00): Er staat inderdaad geen gebouw, maar als iemand zin heeft zou de mooie grote overkapping ingetekend kunnen worden ;-) https://www.zinkinfobenelux.com/14310/web/files/original/2/8/28660.jpg
eggie (2020-05-02 12:25:35+00:00): Mooie foto.. Zou als building=roof getekend kunnen worden. Wel lastig te zien op de luchtfoto?
Leo Slager (2020-05-02 13:31:28+00:00): oké, staat er op.
Kin Sapalot (2020-05-02 13:40:22+00:00): Leuk! layer=1 toegevoegd om een 'roof crosses path' warning op te lossen.
Vinber (2020-05-03 16:21:45+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes un commerçant et que vous souhaitez voir apparaître votre commerce dans OpenStreetMap et donc également sur Ça reste ouvert, Qwant Maps, ... 1 lien ressource : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop 

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
user_5359 (2020-05-02 15:20:14+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Für eine bessere Beschreibung Deines Objektes bitte unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dtravel_agency nach lesen.
eggie (2020-05-02 09:51:36+00:00): Ruben.. gaat eigenlijk best goed. 

Tip: Die open ruimtes liep/ of lopen paden. Dat is zo geïmporteerd vanuit de 3dshapes data.
Wanneer de paden er niet meer zijn kun je de landuse laten aansluiten op het gras. 
De ven heb ik aangepast zodat bos en water niet door elkaar schijnen.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-05-02 09:44:41+00:00): Dag Ruben.. Alle begin is moeilijk. Hier zie je gelijk het probleem als je water op bos gaat mappen. dat hoort netjes ingebed te worden. je ziet anders alles door elkaar.
Verder gebruik je BING als achtergrond. Deze luchtfoto ligt ernstig verschoven en is verouderd. Gebruik svp PDOK actueel. je kunt dat ergens rechts in het editscherm instellen. 
De ven zal ik aanpassen.
MVG,
Eggie
Illio (2020-05-02 11:38:11+00:00): I can't agree with "Radničná nám." being the official name. Of course it is Radničné námestie, "nám." being only an abbreviation.

If you need a source for that, this might serve that purpose: https://bratislava.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Dokumenty/Str%C3%A1nky/Zoznam_komunikacii_v_Bratislave_februar_2020.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0vJLA3m2qCusL4UJ3RtknGYOEmcCMnCI3osixwoRLhG9eGT19gNmcM164
aceman444 (2020-05-03 09:15:00+00:00): I agree "Radničné námestie" would be more logical. So it looks like official documents disagree. Also companies in the neighbouring houses use both "Radničné námestie" and "Radničné nám." randomly. Then we can use what is on the ground, where I have seen the street sign "Radničné námestie".
Illio (2020-05-03 17:09:20+00:00): Official documents don't disagree, the website just uses abbreviated form. Also, the website is not the official document - there could be errors. I am sure you don't really think this square is called "Radničné nám".
elgolfo (2020-05-02 09:39:52+00:00): Hi stilz,

habe mir deine Änderung angeschaut, weil du mit "review requested" einen Review gewünscht hast.

Ich denke, die Tags, die du entfernt hast, passten ziemlich gut zum Goethehäuschen.
amenity=shelter sind alle Arten von Unterständen, die vor schlechtem Wetter schützen, building=yes ist ein Gebäude, tourism=attraction eine Sehenswürdigkeit. Das sieht alles so aus, als wenn das Goethehäuschen das erfüllt. 
Ich würde die Tags noch etwas spezifischer machen und 
amenity=shelter, shelter_type=basic_hut, building=hut hinzufügen.
Details zu den Tags findest du im Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dshelter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dhut

Falls du Fragen hast, kannst du dich gern melden.

Viele Grüße
Moritz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84512682
Carto'Cité (2020-05-18 18:08:55+00:00): Salut nitrix,
Tu as repris les sorties VTT ? :)
Dis-moi je suis curieux sur ce way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46263573 tu es passé de cycleway à path avec bicycle et foot en designated. C’est sûrement bon car il y a eu pas mal d’excès sur les pistes cyclables à une époque quand certaines personnes voulaient les voir ressortir sur les rendus. Je m’interroge surtout sur les designated ; est-ce qu’il y a un panneau en particulier pour le préciser. Si c’est le cas on peut l’ajouter car par exemple pour les voies vertes ça permet de faire sauter des ambiguïtés sur le fait qu’il s’agit ou non d’une voie verte.
Sinon si tu veux échanger sur l’utilisation d’OSM pour le VTT ou la prise de photos Mapillary pour faciliter la contribution n’hésite pas également à me contacter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
aceman444 (2021-04-05 01:43:30+00:00): Zdravim, prosim nepridavajte opisne a genericke nazvy ako "fara". Farsky urad ma svoj riadny nazov a tiez tento typ objektu treba vyjadrit spravnou znackou, tu office=religion.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-02 12:07:46+00:00): This configuration is discouraged.
osmviborg (2020-05-02 11:04:04+00:00): Hej. Næste gang du laver en opdatering/tilføjelse, så undlad venligst at redigere adressepunktet. Tilføj et nyt punkt/POI istedet. Jeg har rettet dine ændringssæt.
ChehrehBargi (2022-01-28 20:40:07+00:00): در تقاطع باکری و مالک اشتر قبلا به وسیله جدول، گردش به راست از مالک اشتر به باکری جدا شده بود. بیش از 2 سال است که برداشته شده و بنده همان 2 سال پیش آن را حذف کرده بودم.
naveenpf (2020-06-29 14:53:09+00:00): Kottarakara taluk was wrongly tagged
walking_daily (2023-01-30 08:29:16+00:00): Hi, this is an interesting path. I'm not sure that it's the route of the Llangollen round though. I think the route is slightly to the East of this path, using the public footpath in Carrog forest. I've seen markers for the round heading that way. Maybe the route has varied over time? Happy to discuss if you like.
achsaw (2023-01-31 09:56:15+00:00): Hi walking_daily,

Thank You for looking into the changeset. We have made the service road using the available resources. Don't have enough proof like street view or drivers feedback to validate the path and make changes. Thanks again, looking forward to learn more.

Regards,
achsaw
Jordi MF (2020-05-02 23:09:43+00:00): Hola,
¿Qué pretendías añadir? Solo has puesto un nodo con el nombre "senia". No aporta ninguna información nueva al mapa. La calle ya está mapeada y con su nombre correcto. Esperaré a la aclaración antes de eliminar este nodo.
Gracias y buen mapeo.
btwhite92 (2020-05-06 14:37:19+00:00): Why was Bunny Hill Drive north of the small residential area bumped up beyond track or service at best? Have you ever physically been on it before?
ma-rt-in (2020-05-03 09:55:41+00:00): Hallo,
Wer darf bei Node 7473245359 tatsächlich durch. Auf der einen Seite sagst du, das es nur ein privater Zugang gestattet ist und zugleich, das niemand durch darf.
vg
Warin61 (2023-08-28 00:46:23+00:00): Hi,
The university building numbers look like ref=* numbers - not address numbers.