piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mottiger (2021-12-02 15:26:38+00:00): Dear Jerry,

I know that I don't need to, but we decided to do it in this first phase of mapping. Later, when more people get involved it is easier to add more details to the relation than selecting all the solar panels. And it makes it a lot easier to get information about the area covered by panels for a plant, at least in JOSM.

Cheers
Marcel
AppleME (2021-11-28 00:04:45+00:00): forgot source, https://noosadistrictshs.eq.edu.au/
https://cooranss.eq.edu.au/
https://cooroyss.eq.edu.au/
https://pomonass.eq.edu.au/
aweech (2021-11-28 15:20:21+00:00): Hi,
In OpenStreetMap, we do not deliberately enter data incorrectly for so it shows up some way on a renderer. The Block U is not a pedestrian area. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer for more information.
Cristoffs (2022-01-08 21:03:55+00:00): Cześć !
Nie ma sensu używać tego w Polsce. Dodatkowo drogi na terenach działkowych powinny być oznaczone service nie track no i na 100% nie mapujemy z maxara w pl
SomeoneElse (2021-11-28 00:39:16+00:00): Previously part of Tower Bridge Road and two parts of Decima Street were part of the multipolygon.  This didn't look right - most importantly because the imagery shows Tower Bridge Road as quite wide here and the pedestrian area much narrower than previously drawn.
Also the packaging of the outside roads into a multipolygon meant as far as I can see they were no longer valid geometrical objects in their own right - I was seeing one (arguably correctly) not shown and one (arguably in error) appear.
What's missing now I suspect is the "logical linear footway" through the pedestrian area, and where it connects to the sidewalk (or perhaps a crossing) to the south, and the connections to the crossings at east and northeast.
SK53 (2021-11-28 09:33:35+00:00): IIRC Richard found a similar pedestrian area glued to roads somewhere in this part of SE London, the glueing caused some oddities in cycle routing because of tags on the polygon. This would have been several years ago.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-28 10:34:33+00:00): Where I've seen similar issues previously is around Marble Arch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5640188 .  There the data wasn't invalid and I had to explicitly exclude that type of junction from processing.  Here the tags on the multipolygon members just didn't make a lot of sense, in addition to the geometry being unlikely.  I left it as a multipolygon with one member to make the history easier to see, but arguably that should be tidied now.  I saved the previous state at https://gist.github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/d3e8a4951b013cb8cbeeaf77706615ba .  With osm2pgsql 0.96.0 the order of the ways in the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5660722/history had an effect on which appeared and which didn't.  Note that even the "non-road" in that relation had access tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380116486/history .  Is there an easy overpass way to find "multipolygon relation with certain tags with constituent ways with certain tags"?  It might be useful to look for more.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-01 18:20:47+00:00): Note that it is perfectly fine to have shop and building housing shop as separate elements.

In fact it is preferable, as no for example name refers to both shop and building.
gendy54 (2022-10-15 15:57:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour les dénominations de voies, je ne sais pas si tu connais https://bano.openstreetmap.fr/pifometre/
BeKri (2021-11-28 08:55:02+00:00): amenity=place_of_worship ???
Ned wirklich oda ? ;-))
Hast Du einen Namen von den Eisstocklern
dann könnten wir es als 
sport=ice stock sport eintragen mit Name der dann dasteht
Mundilfari (2021-11-28 05:51:31+00:00): Hey...couple of questions on this one:
- what's the thought behind tagging the fairways on golfcourses as landuse=grass (the wiki* says not to do that)? Tagging for the renderer of some sorts? Or was that inadvertent? Same question on the Tees and Greens (although these are not explicitly being mentioned on the wiki page).

- I believe a big chunk of the building on the SW corner of 103rd and 59 is some sort of medical offices (something Dupage Medical Group, if I remember correctly, not sure what exactly, and, I believe, a pediatrist's office also on the north side of the bldg). Are you sure this whole building should be building=retail just bc there's a liquor store on the back side?

-Same thought on the bldg on the SW corner of Rollingridge and 59 - mostly medical offices, I believe. building=retail just sounds super random for those. What is being sold there?

- what's the deal with the pool-inside-of-a-pool situation in Bristol Station? The actual pool was tagged fine, and the fenced-in area surrounding it isn't a pool...

- What's the reason for changing building=fire_station to building=public on Nap Fire Dep Station 4? building=fire_station is valid, and way more specific...
Are you aware of the differences** between building=fire_station and amenity=fire_station? One is the grounds, the other is the building, they do not represent the same thing. What you created is a fire station (amenity) within a fire station (amenity), but without an actual fire station building - that's definitely not what's on the ground.

- What's the thought behind removing crossing=zebra (on Conan Doyle Rd)***?

Thanks,

* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

** https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dfire_station

*** https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dzebra
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 18:50:41+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9289218561/history has shop = factory that was added in this edit
shop=factory? is it providing some service or selling products to general public ? Or is it man_made=works? Or is it company office (office=company)?

If it is shop, which of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop would fit? Or is it selling something else?
MrYadro (2021-11-28 22:40:30+00:00): Добрый день, это официальное название этого здания? Это общая карта и тут не место личным отметкам
Vyacheslav_Konstantinov (2021-12-04 15:42:25+00:00): Здравствуйте! Я ошибся. Удалите отметку.
trial (2024-04-16 19:39:33+00:00): Bonjour, attention en ajoutant les accès parkings : certains comme ici https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/228749520 doivent être redécoupés sinon vous ajoutez de fausses informations.
ralley (2021-11-28 06:08:42+00:00): This is Newmarket Station bus stop #7400 as it was correctly tagged before NOT the train station, see https://at.govt.nz/bus-train-ferry/timetables/find-my-stop-or-station-on-a-map/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114311113
cjhond (2021-11-28 20:22:27+00:00): Yes apologies
DENelson83 (2021-11-29 07:32:03+00:00): Good job on helping to continue maintaining this coastline data.  I have been in this area adding relations for named bodies of seawater, and we recently had a discussion on the talk-ca mailing list raising concerns that the data I was adding might not easily be maintainable in the face of other editors continuing to maintain the actual coastline data.  I added a special tag to the bodies of seawater relations, "ocean"="yes", to allow other editors to filter out the data set I was adding so they can continue to maintain the coastline while I continue to maintain the named bodies of seawater.  This is a perfect example of collaboration among multiple editors to improve many distinct facets of OpenStreetMap's database.  Thank you so much, and keep it up.
HMWamboldt (2021-11-29 20:48:34+00:00): Hi DENelson83! Thank you for the message. "ocean"="yes" is redundant and I would otherwise might have removed it. (It's flagged by Osmose I think.) I often pick an area to fix from issues flagged by OSM Inspector and Osmose then continue from there.

Mostly I do casual mapping to improve the map display and routing in OSMAND+.

One question. There's a lot of "intermittent=yes" for coastal regions. According to the wiki intermittent is explicitly *not* for tidal areas, so I've been converting them to "tidal" as many of these are not exclusively tidal flats. Is this the correct action? It looks like these are NRCan-CanVec automatic imports. I suspect that someone just preferred the OSM map rendering of intermittent. Is there a national standard for this? Is there some application where "intermittent" would be preferable? I didn't find anything on the Canada wiki page.

If you find I've broken something, please let me know or just go ahead and just fix it. I practice egoless mapping.

Best Rgds, -H-
DENelson83 (2021-12-08 17:14:49+00:00): Those are indeed automated imports from CanVec.  I have also been converting some of them to tidalflats as I come across them, using guidance from Canadian Hydrographic Service charts.

The tag "ocean=yes" has a purpose.  It stems from a discussion on the talk-ca mailing list about issues with the maintainability of the area definition data I have been putting in for named bodies of seawater.  Anyone can filter out data with that tag if they want to work on the coastline without worrying about breaking anything, even those relations I have been adding, as I have stated on talk-ca that I am willing to maintain the area definition data for seawater in Canada.
cjhond (2021-11-28 20:30:11+00:00): Full name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114311144
felipeeugenio (2021-11-28 23:04:03+00:00): Hola. Esas calles internas de los edificios son service, y por favor siempre agregar el tag access=private cuando corresponda.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114311164
BeKri (2021-11-28 08:05:30+00:00): Mann Du legst ja los wie Sau ;-))
Jetzt muss ich aufpassen ...
Grad wollt ich den Zahnarzt wieder zurückschieben,
weil ich wie bei der Nätschahütte
dachte ich hätte sie aus versehen verschoben ;-))
Ich mach mal weiter Häuschen ;-)
cjhond (2021-11-28 20:27:39+00:00): Shop has closed at this location
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114311249
cjhond (2021-11-28 20:25:55+00:00): Dessert shop reclassification
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114311254
AgusQui (2021-12-13 05:08:13+00:00): Las estaciones de Morrison y Ballesteros no tienen servicios de pasajeros, por lo que no corresponde agregar public_transport=*. 
La indicacion de estacion ferroviaria ya estaba en su correspondiente nodo railway=* que al agregarlo al edificio has duplicado esta asignación. Se coloca en un nodo y no a todo el edificio debido a que una estación abarca mucho mas que la edificación. Si quieres indicar el edificio de estación debes usar building=train_station.
compdude (2021-12-24 05:39:16+00:00): Hello, the consensus in the US community is that roads with only one interchange sandwiched between at-grade intersections are too short to be tagged as motorway and should be tagged as trunk or lower.
jmty8 (2021-12-22 08:26:48+00:00): Hello j h 1 2 3, could you please send me the ground truth source of road name (Caleb Wood Court)?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114311357
jnighan (2021-11-28 02:48:52+00:00): *Add park
user_13980615 (2021-11-28 11:29:22+00:00): 范围写小了，应是“白河北岸 李宁体育园-光武大桥段”
mariotomo (2021-11-28 17:02:07+00:00): hey, it looks like "raro" (curious, suspicious, surprising) all these "cafés" you have added where I don't see the building that would contain all these "generally informal place with sit-down facilities selling beverages and light meals and/or snacks."
can you confirm your mapping please?
adrumillon (2021-11-28 17:08:42+00:00): Hey, I understand. Those are all coffee farms. They have tours showing around their productions, coffee tasting, and selling their beans. That’s the closest I could find to mark them as "cafes" instead of "farms".
mariotomo (2021-11-28 17:11:52+00:00): well, it's not a café in the sense of café as said in the wiki.  you see that.  ask on help.openstreetmap.org, state your question explaining "the closest you could find", and ask for other opinions, more informed than mine.  I can only tell you this doesn't look right.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-11-28 23:56:30+00:00): Hello again,

You seem to have an intersection of the sale relation, here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006873855 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006873854

Is one of these lines possibly redundant?
Warin61 (2021-11-29 03:05:32+00:00): Exactly what is 'Jewells - Redhead - Bennetts Green boundary' Relation 13447773??? 

Jewells, Redhead and Bennetts Green are already in as administration boundaries.
AndrewS (2021-11-29 06:30:51+00:00): Hi @Warin61, I created it as a boundary to the 'natural' features of that area (as against the admin) thinking that would help fill in the details for the many natural land covers. Since realised that is not needed to do that, and have deleted it.
felipeeugenio (2021-11-28 23:06:13+00:00): Hola Sergio
uno de los principios básicos de OSM es que se dibuja lo que se constata en terreno. Si hay una construcción está perfecto, pero si no hay nada, no hay nada. Para los nombres por favor usar el nombre, no la palabra "futuro". Claramente no se llama asi el términal.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114312011
felipeeugenio (2021-11-28 23:07:11+00:00): Además, por favor notar que el tag building es para los edificios. no para los recintos completos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114312011
zbrown4 (2021-12-04 01:11:49+00:00): Hi thedashcunning! Thanks for contributing! Looks like you may have accidentally modified the name of a section of 109th Ave Northeast to 109th Court Northeast
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114312125
mattmaxon (2022-07-20 19:14:47+00:00): Not sure why you changed the trace of the colby canyon trail. I maintain the trail from the highway to the saddle and have worked on literally every inch of the trail. I recorded the trace that was on the OSM map with a Garmin GPSMap 65st multiband receiver with corrections and can assure you and anyone who looks at the data it is as good as it gets with a handheld GPS
Michael Sallwasser (2022-08-04 01:59:25+00:00): I have edited many routes, so I no longer remember the particulars. I probably used the aerial photographs to make adjustments.
cyton (2022-02-25 12:13:02+00:00): Darf ich fragen wieso du eine andere (!) hausnummer  zusätzlich in das feld "addr:street" am ende hinzugefügt hast? damit ist das nicht mehr konsistent mit der nummer 17 in "addr:housenumber"

ich bitte darum nochmal vor ort zu prüfen welche hausnummer nun so stimmt, oder ob es beide gibt
cyton (2022-02-25 12:13:56+00:00): siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3064671
KrzysztZ (2023-07-31 10:54:33+00:00): Szedłeś ta ścieżką?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006882043
Próbowałem 29.07 sie przedostac na rowerze z Gacek do Ponika przez las. w okolicy tej ścieżki  - dramat, bagno, niby-drogi to rynny wypełnione wodą. Nie udało mi sie jej znaleźc,  po dłuższym braku opadów może by się udało
Frans S (2021-11-28 12:10:36+00:00): Hello.  Correct mapped.
Just a remark
This is a project where only buildings and roads are mapped. Please adhere to that
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114312945
BeKri (2021-11-28 07:57:21+00:00): Gibt es das Carbidwerk noch ??
Homepage schon. aber ...
Ich hab das nicht ganz kapiert mit den Wasserläufen,
aber ich denke, das muss man auch die Geologie vor Ort kennen ...
jedenfalls sehr interessant was man früher so alles "geschafft" hat.
Frans S (2021-11-28 12:05:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most  and mapped. 

Short roads leading to a single building or business do not need to be mapped if they can be seen from the main road.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114313120
Frans S (2021-11-28 11:55:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not  in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not allways accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the mapped building in the mapping
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114313421
Frans S (2021-11-28 11:09:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not  in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points: 
A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.


Please do not upload every single mapped building . Collect a number of buildings before uploading them.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114313535
Diana IRM-ED (2023-03-17 09:02:05+00:00): Hi SNN95,
You did great job mapping. 
I found that you created 4 relations building=terrace (id relations 1006892343, 1348728, 13487279, and 13487278)

So, I want to ask why you made a relation to the building when you didn't provide detailed area information.
Can we delete the relation in those buildings? 
Do you have any other suggestions? please tell me.
Thank for your understanding.
Happy Mapping
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-20 04:41:05+00:00): Please do not mark streams and rivers as submerged (underground) when that is not the case.

Other golf edits by the user shall be validated.
opendcc (2022-07-05 20:20:57+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast da eine Straße eingezeichnet, die ich in keinem Luftbild nachvollziehen kann. (Nähe Voglsam).
user_8655426 (2021-11-28 11:11:59+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
You said "OK.", but did you read my message?

"Most information that you find on the web is copyrighted, including "free" maps like Google Maps. You may never use copyrighted resources because it can cause a lot of trouble to OSM."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1

Please "do not copy any information from Wikipedia into OSM. Wikipedia is licensed under CC-BY-SA which is incompatible with OSM. In addition, we are much stricter on copyright than the Wikipedia is. "

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Collaboration_with_Wikipedia

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918174059
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114286113
user_2008655 (2021-11-29 01:11:15+00:00): しかし、あなたがここで主張したことは真実ではないのではないかと思います。(I'm afraid that, however, that what you argued here aren't true.)
「ウィキペディアからOSMに情報をコピーしないでください」と言いますが、名前を追加しても情報は提供されません。名前（国道19号など）は名前が付けられているという事実にすぎず、事実は著作権で保護されていません（http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/works-not-covered-copyright#facts）、サードパーティのサイトから名前を提供することもできますが、どのようにして「名前の著作権」を所有していますか？ 微笑んだ。(You say "do not copy any information from Wikipedia into OSM", but adding names aren't providing informations, the names (National Highway Route 19... etc here) are just the facts that they are named, Facts aren't copyrightable (http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/works-not-covered-copyright#facts), I may also provide names from any third party sites, but how they own "copyright on names"? A little laughed.)
論理的には、これらの機能のいずれにも、サードパーティが著作権を所有しているため名前を付ける必要があります。「日本」は日本政府が著作権を所有しているため、国名「日本」も含まれます。 正しい？(Under your logical, non of these features should have names as they are copyrighted by third parties, even the country name "Japan", as "Japan" is copyrighted by Japanese Government. Right?)
user_8655426 (2021-11-29 09:11:38+00:00): こんにちは。
道路に name や opening_date などをつけたいのなら、現地に行って何と表示されているのかを調べる、またはMapillary の画像を確認する、などしてください。上のあなたのコメントは、これまでの編集を正当化しようとするための言い訳としか思えません。

・Pick your mapping technique (データ収集手法を選ぶ)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pick_your_mapping_technique

Wikipediaの内容は情報が古かったり、誤っていたりすることがあります。特に地方の道路の記事では、英語名称やインターチェンジ名が「現地で表示されている名前と異なる」場合が多いです。
現地調査をもとにOSMを編集していれば、そういったことに気がつくはずです。

それから、メッセージのほうにいただいた別の件ですが、了解いたしました。(実は、私もそうしようと思っていました。) 
また、データの履歴の確認を怠り、申し訳ありませんでした。
数日中に返信させていただきますので、よろしくお願いします。
Diacritic (2021-11-28 10:24:18+00:00): Hello. :)

Thanks for your contribution.

After a small discussion on the talk-au mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-September/015042.html), it was generally agreed that tagging a suburb as a 'town' isn't correct. 

I'm currently in the process of reverting a whole bunch of these town tags back to suburbs. You can see what it looks like in the south east where all the suburbs have been configured as nodes. I can change this node to a suburb and attach it as a label to the relation if that's easier for you? :)

I'd encourage you to join the mailing list (if you haven't already) as its a great place to talk and discuss changes with fellow mappers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114314663
a-walsh (2021-11-28 10:38:22+00:00): Hey, thanks for letting me know. Fair enough for sure. I will have a look at how it's been done and work on fixing up the other surrounding suburbs.

Also - I will join the mailing list. Thanks :)
Frans S (2021-11-28 11:07:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

You added a bicycle parking. Have you local knowlegde ?
Map buildings just as building=yes
Where there is still no roof on a building, tag it as building=construction.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114314667