piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2018-01-15 15:57:20+00:00): Olá @Eduardo Dutra.

É sempre questionável se uma área residencial militar deve ser mapeada como residential ou military, já que não é possível mapeá-la de ambas as maneiras.

Porém a comunidade nacional chegou ao consenso que deve-se marcá-la como military, que é a função principal, até porque é uma área de acesso restrito e com proteção militar.

Ah... Bem vindo ao OSM. Muito legal saber que há novos colaboradores na região. Se você morar na Vila Militar, ou se você a frequentar constantemente, poderia ajudar mapeando a numeração das casas dela. Qualquer dúvida, têmo aê.

user santamariense
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
andygol (2018-02-04 19:58:50+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55440608
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Gh0stz0x (2018-01-15 09:48:44+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, dovresti spostare il nodo all'interno della costruzione dove si trova l'affittacamere. Se dovesse essere tutta la struttura ti consiglio di spostare i tag dal nodo al poligono. Grazie e buon mapping.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
M!dgardAutomated (2018-01-14 19:20:39+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47553709, 47553740.
Gavilu95 (2018-01-16 13:00:04+00:00): Added a park
mueschel (2018-01-18 15:46:23+00:00): Hi,
you could add a tag "maxstay" to state how long you are allowed to stay here, e.g. maxstay = 3 min
This can be understood by various tools.

Cheers, Jan
trial (2018-01-18 20:03:22+00:00): I can't as there is no such limit: there is no written limit. Well, as it's bordered by a blue line, it's probably at most something like 1h30  but in practice it should be lower. 30 min? But nothing written.
On [OSM-talk-fr] we were discussing about adding on the way
parking:condition:right=no_parking
Better description but not yet in Wiki:
parking:condition:right=kiss_and_ride
parking:condition:right=drop_off
Danke trotzdem für den Hinweis.
Hjart (2018-01-14 19:30:37+00:00): Bemærk at Frederik Ramm i hans indlæg på postlisten har bedt om at alle tilføjelser baseret på data fra kulturarv.dk omgående stoppes indtil vi har en klar tilkendegivelse af at vi må bruge deres data.
tbicr (2018-01-15 09:38:41+00:00): Добры дзень, заўважыў Вашыя зьмены. Дзякуй што дадаеце хаты ў вёсцы, але я хацеў зьвярнуць увагу на большую дакладнасьць маляваньня, як прыклад удакладніў геаметрыі з дапамогаю josm buiding plugin: http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=55455953.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Gavilu95 (2018-01-14 19:37:30+00:00): ho aggiustato la zona del parco
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:35:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:36:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
andygol (2018-02-04 19:58:35+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55441164
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:20:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
marc__marc (2019-04-07 18:57:27+00:00): Hello,
about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5339665593
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5339665596
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5339665597
horse=* is an acces key, so it's better to avoid using horse=mounting_block 
maybe it's better to change it into amenity=mounting_block or man_made=mounting_block
Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse (2019-04-07 20:28:48+00:00): Thanks - I'm sure I've argued in the past _against_ using horse=mounting_block for these.  Not sure why I used it here.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:39:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:21:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 08:07:20+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314621965/history has surface:pt = Asfalto that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
is surface:pt really wanted or a good idea? It seems a pointless duplication of surface tag to me - in which case surface:pt would be useful and wanted? Note that editors may have support for translating/presenting tag value in local language.

See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lAT
Rodrigo Rega (2024-04-25 21:14:23+00:00): Hi! I don't know why I added that "surface:pt" tag. I don't remember to use any portuguese tags, beacause I do not understand portuguese. I think that you are right and that tag is not neccesary. Thanks for noticing it!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:43:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-14 21:21:22+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

De playground zit vastgeplakt aan de weg. dat is niet de bedoeling. Ook heeft hij een naam speeltuin ...dat zal toch niet?
eggie (2018-01-14 21:28:28+00:00): Ik heb de playground losgemaakt en omgezet in een grasveld met bomen en waar het speeltoestel staat de playground op een node. Dit komt meer met de werkelijkheid overheen. We proberen te mappen wat we zien. Het is geen speelplaats van het begin tot het eind van de straat. je kunt het als voorbeeld gebruiken. Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
JokerMarc (2018-01-15 18:31:54+00:00): Zat al druk te kijken hoe alles werkte en hoe alles aan te passen kwam er niet geheel uit en vandaag te druk om eerder uw berichten te zien en beantwoorden.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-14 21:40:16+00:00): Hier heb je Bleeklaan 21 verplaats baar de Bleekhof. dat zal vast wel niet de bedoeling zijn geweest.
Hier kun je dat zien. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55441721
Ik zal het herstellen.
eggie (2018-01-14 21:47:13+00:00): Het adres heb ik hersteld.
Een stukje groen is geen Leisure park. \Leisure park geeft alleen een functie weer en is geen landuse . dus dat wat je ziet.
Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Parkedits en dit soort playgrounds liggen onder een vergrootglas ivm Pokemonvandalisme.  Was is je motiefom hier een park te creëren?  Graag reactie.
JokerMarc (2018-01-15 18:35:46+00:00): was niet de bedoeling om het adres aan 
te passen indd, mijn excuus hier voor, begin ent te editten en moet het 1 en ander nog leren, je word hier ook direct in het diepe gegooid.
eggie (2018-01-15 20:26:35+00:00): Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust. 
 
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
Bezoek ook het forum. Daar zit de know how. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Het hokje review requested heb je gelukkig al aangevinkt zodat ervaren mappers kunnen begeleiden.
Bedankt voor je reactie.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-14 21:32:39+00:00): Aangepast als voorbeeld. Niet 123 een speeltuin mappen en klaar omdat die er moet zijn. Ook goed inzoomen zodat je plakken aan wegen kunt voorkomen.
Graag voorzichtig met de kaart.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-01-14 20:13:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Viajero Perdido (2018-08-25 15:43:32+00:00): Hi hoserab.

The wiki suggests village for between "1,000 and 10,000 inhabitants".  This looks smaller, perhaps a hamlet.

(The whole province, maybe whole country, is messed up in this area, thanks to an old import.  If I'm really bored some day I may try to tackle that...)
hoserab (2018-08-26 21:42:21+00:00): Hi Tom,
The reason why I tagged this one as a village is simple: in Alberta hamlets are unincorporated places within a municipal district, whereas villages are incorporated and not within the jurisdiction of an M.D. In this case this is one of about 50 "summer villages": they don't actually have much of a permanent population over the winter, but the seasonal population swells in the summer, and it's categorically outside the jurisdiction of Clearwater County. 
Now, I know that doesn't necessarily jive with what the wiki says, but it also says hamlets are "smaller rural communities, typically with fewer than 100-200 inhabitants," so it begs the question: what do we call municipalities with more than 200 but less than 1000 inhabitants? There is no tag for that, apparently.
It definitely needs to have the administrative boundary around it, to separate it from the county, and I figured it's more important to tag it as a village given its relative importance in the area. I'm not going to raise my hackles if you want to change it though. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Viajero Perdido (2018-08-27 00:40:39+00:00): I'd forgotten about the lack of category for 200-1000.  But you think there are more than 200 people even on a summer weekend?  (I'll admit, it's been a while since I glanced at the satellite view.)

I always follow the wiki recommendations rather than politicians' locally distorted ideas, eg pipsqueak "cities" (coughChestermerecough) that don't deserve a great big label.  Makes for better consistency worldwide.

But, your call.  I don't want to parachute in and mess things up; I usually focus on other things.

Cheers,
Tom / VP
hoserab (2018-08-27 02:57:20+00:00): I subscribe to the idea that unless someone really codifies a system of "hamlet"=#### inhabitants, "village"=####, "town"=####, etc. we ought to tag settlements making consideration for how the local administration works, and how important the settlement is relative to the local area. 

E.g. Caroline is tagged as a 'town', and it's a 'town' in Albertan municipal legalese, but more importantly it's a relatively large settlement in the area and—to me—carries the importance we ascribe to a 'town' on the wiki: "Use place=town to identify an important urban centre that is larger than a place=village, smaller than a place=city, and not a place=suburb. Towns normally have a good range of shops and facilities which are used by people from nearby villages." Caroline is rinky-dink in the scheme of the planet Earth, but a 'big deal' in Clearwater County, Alberta.

The summer villages are kind of wishy-washy. They are a 'big deal' in the summer, hence the special status. I bet a few hundred people will be there on summer weekends. Like I said though, if you really want to change the node from place=village to place=hamlet it won't bother me in the slightest. I think too much time on OSM is wasted by people arguing over relatively unimportant minutiae, hahaha. ("This is a residential road!", "No it's a tertiary road!" etc., etc.)
Viajero Perdido (2018-08-27 03:00:40+00:00): Your judgment sounds good; I'll let it slide.

Thanks for taking the time to respond.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:16:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:32:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].