piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2022-03-13 00:16:46+00:00): Preco krmidlo pre zvierata nie je "obcianska vybavenost" (cokolvek to znamena) ? Ale ako objekt to existuje, cize nie je dovod to mazat.
hoserab (2022-03-11 18:54:48+00:00): Hello LaiSzeCheung,

I'm guessing from your changeset comment "GEOG588" that you're a UofC student, working on OSM for course work.

FYI, heads up: the ways that you added in this change and tagged as "highway=pedestrian" should be "highway=footway" and "footway=sidewalk" instead. "highway=pedestrian" is for roads that are predominantly used by pedestrians, e.g. Stephen Avenue downtown. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way for reference. Please revise your changes to suit.

Have fun and good luck with your class. :)
praeteritum (2023-04-24 04:42:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135283896.
eggie (2022-03-11 19:04:08+00:00): Dag Gerrist..  
Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar...... 
Je hebt de Oude IJsselweg 'gesplitst'.. of eigenlijk juist niet. Het is nu onduidelijk wat eenrichtingverkeer is. Langs welke kant ga je langs dat middenstuk. Verder loopt er een routerelatie.
Daar heb je waarschijnlijk geen rekening mee gehouden. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-11 19:05:52+00:00): Mag je op de kruising Hoofstraat Oude IJssel weg wel afslaan.. of zijn daar afslagbeperkingen?
eggie (2022-03-11 19:06:45+00:00): Op de weg staat het aantal lanes..  (Rijstroken)
Klopt dat nu wel?
eggie (2022-03-11 19:15:44+00:00): Routerelaties hersteld...  aantal lanes hersteld. 
lanes:forward en backward verwijderd. Dat gaat hier niet meer op. Kennelijk was hier een voorsorteerstrook. 
Voorsoorteervakken verwijderd.
Hoe zit het met de afslagbeperkingen?
Graag info.  Dan kan het aangepast worden.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-11 19:23:02+00:00): Nog een vraag. 
Op de laatste satellietfoto zijn geen fietsoversteken niet meer te zien.
Dan rijden de fietsers toch gewoon door het middenstuk?
eggie (2022-03-11 19:28:53+00:00): OSM lijkt zo simpel , maar is dat zeker niet voor starters.
De oversteken zijn G12a bromfietspaden.
Ze routeren niet want je de zo oversteek komt uit op een oneway=yes Dus tegen het verkeer in.
Ik pas het aan en zal gelijk de wandelroute verleggen.
De oude fietspaden zal ik verwijderen.

Dit zijn je edits . Dan kun je zien als je klikt op de wegdelen waar het niet kan routeren.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118374787
eggie (2022-03-11 19:45:46+00:00): De kruising is aangepast en zal nu weer routeren.

Je kunt ook specifiek aangeven in editor iD en JOSM of iemand naar je edits wil kijken door het hokje aan te vinken bij: “Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt”   
Zeker in het begin is dat belangrijk.
MVG
eggie

 
Soms zorgen kleine aanpassingen dat iets niet meer routeert.
Rainero (2022-03-12 21:42:13+00:00): Revert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118413355 : undiskutierter Massenedit. Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75105
praeteritum (2023-04-24 04:41:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135283880.
dpolovinkin (2025-06-20 15:17:18+00:00): love the comment haha
ivanbranco (2022-03-12 08:00:11+00:00): Hi skipper76,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039404054/history

what kind of place are the ones you added? place=yes is quite generic. Are they neighbourhood, city blocks, something else?

You can read some available values here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
praeteritum (2023-03-19 12:32:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133856000.
chris66 (2022-03-12 17:03:46+00:00): Dieser Massenedit war nicht angemeldet und ist inhaltlich auch nicht korrekt. Deshalb ist ein Revert notwendig.
pizben03 (2022-03-13 14:56:45+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#118375384

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
Rainero (2022-03-13 09:20:47+00:00): Revert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118422170 : undiskutierter Massenedit. Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75105
pizben03 (2022-03-13 14:55:01+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#118375535

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
pizben03 (2022-03-13 14:53:55+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#118375693

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
SomeoneElse (2022-03-11 21:46:47+00:00): Hello,
I just happened to notice that this changeset seems to have deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835498714/history (which isn't very near Chipping Norton) but left the nodes that formed part of it.  I wonder if something went a bit wrong?
Best Regards,
Andy
Wookey (2022-03-12 02:02:55+00:00): Yes. Well spotted. I got a conflict on this object and josm wouldn't let me resolv it as 'leave the other version' (that left the 'resolve' button greyed out. So I had to give my version.

Now ideally JOSM wouldn't be including objects from another trip a month ago and miles away, and I did try to 'purge' everything in the data layer outside the chipping norton zone, but this was clearly still there (possibly becuse it was a deletion?), and I don't know how to make it 'only upload stuff within given rectangle'.

I keep ending up with this problem because I use Vespucci, but it can't upload anything directly, so I end up saving an osc file, tidying it up in JOSM and uploading, but the vespucci file just gets bigger every time covering everywhere I have mapped in the last 4 months. I've not found out how to reset that either. 

I found 'purge' this time which does seem to have removed everything from Nottingham, but not this change in Fowlmere.

If you know how to fix any of these things (vespucci 'backlog' reset, vespucci uploads, JOSM area restriction on changesets, or how to tell it to just forget about a particular conflict) I'm all ears, otherwise I'll try and work it out.

And yes I'll sort this deleted way out too. Thanks for the prod.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-12 09:42:26+00:00): Thanks.  For Vespucci issues it might be worth mentioning it at https://github.com/MarcusWolschon/osmeditor4android/issues - maybe the way that you're using it hasn't been anticipated?  I've not seen it myself since I always upload directly from Vespucci.
With Josm I try and do new things in new data layers (and deleting data layers when I've finished with them) - that should work around any issues there.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-12 09:57:14+00:00): One question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833213512#map=18/52.14932/-0.03204 though (since you were there recently) - the southern bit doesn't exist on imagery, but it previously included a section north of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4463958420 where something is visible on imagery - does that exist, and if so what is it?  https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gPN shows ways in the area a couple of months ago, https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gPO just that one way.
Wookey (2022-03-12 22:07:27+00:00): There is only one (quite high quality) track on that whole route from the farm buildings (bottom left) to the tree belts (top right), despite the doubled paths that appear on bing imagery and https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gPO
There is a grass path from that crossover point going downhill across the field, but it's not strong and could easily change from year to year - it's mostly how the grass has been cut. After editing last night I left it as connecting to the farmyard as that was indicated by previous edits and the imagery, but I'm not sure that is still true.

I spent a while last night removing parallel track/footpath/bridleway instances in this area and getting the designations/permissions right (SFAIK).
Next time I visit I'll have a proper look at this area to make sure it is correct. It has clearly changed a few times over the last few years.
The NT have changed quite a lot around Wimpole over the last couple of years (new carpark, major new paths, closing major paths, resurfaced tracks like this one,  (that was probably 3-4 years ago actually)). Those works may partially explain the appearing/disappearing parallel routes here, although some of what was there is definitely just duplicate mapping.

So to answer your question clearly: No the northern parallel path does not exist. There is a (much less permanent) southern secondary path, but I'm not sure it's correctly aligned in current OSM.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-12 22:22:33+00:00): Thanks for sorting it out!
confusedbuffalo (2022-04-14 08:47:39+00:00): Unrelated to the above discussion, you've added a couple of objects with phone=pole (and no other tags)
It's not clear what you've meant by this, is it something like
man_made=utility_pole
utility=telecom

or

man_made=mast
tower:type=communication
communication:mobile_phone=yes

phone= should only be for the phone number of an object
Wookey (2022-04-14 12:52:32+00:00): I put these in temporarily whilst using vespucci as I didn't know the right tags. I thought I had fixed them all afterwards in JOSM after looking up the tags, but it seems I missed two. I've fixed those now. Thanks for spotting that.
praeteritum (2023-03-19 12:30:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 133855934.
praeteritum (2022-09-24 22:41:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126598915.
drivec (2022-05-11 01:07:41+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-21 02:37:48+00:00): Hi _wp. Your edit looks awesome, but there's an issue with building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1039414561) due overlap with water body. Would you mind to recheck and fix the issue, please? If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143787173). Thank you.
drivec (2022-05-11 01:07:27+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
drivec (2022-05-11 01:05:48+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
SherbetS (2022-04-22 15:09:41+00:00): Hey Chris Lawrence,

on this object
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9571540605

you used the tag man_made=communications_tower when in reality the object is actually man_made=mast + tower:type=communication

I understand that this is probably due to the confusing nature of the JOSM presets, but please use the correct tagging in the future.

thanks,
SherbetS
Rainero (2022-03-13 09:28:25+00:00): Revert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118422326 : undiskutierter Massenedit. Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75105
abakus_uploader (2022-03-11 23:32:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
cquest (2022-03-12 08:33:12+00:00): Bonjour,

Les tag website=* ne doivent pointer que vers le site web officiel. Le lien que vous avez ajouté n'ont aucun caractère officiel et n'ont donc pas leur place dans OpenStreetMap.

Voir: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
cquest (2022-03-12 08:32:52+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous avez créé un doublon, le lac était déjà présent. De plus, le nom n'a pas à contenir le numéro du département et la source des autres éléments est douteuse.

Pour les liens, ceux-ci, répétés plusieurs fois n'ont pas leur place dans OpenStreetMap.

Je signale donc vos contributions pour que votre compte soit éventuellement bloqué.
Sanniu (2022-03-13 10:16:27+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!

Please add a building address in the address field and not in the name field so it will be searchable.
like:
addr:street=
addr:housenumber=
Warin61 (2022-03-13 04:48:23+00:00): Hi,
Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.74970&lat=-33.75020&zoom=17

As both ways used in the relation have no tags .. simply place the relevant tags on those ways and remove the relation. Much simpler.
Jack465 (2022-03-13 04:57:35+00:00): Thanks Warin, fixed in 118418152
user_12328418 (2022-03-12 07:44:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=digester?uselang=de

Man nutzt die vor Ort Methode, also was und wie man es sieht. 
Andere Änderungen sollten beweisbar sein - Foto, Webseite
chris66 (2022-03-13 13:15:18+00:00): building=sty ??
hmkaiser (2022-03-14 08:24:17+00:00): Sorry, da lag ich daneben. Es scheint sich eher um Pferdeställe zu handeln. buildings auf yes zurückgesetzt.
PT-53 (2022-03-14 10:25:13+00:00): Und was ist mit der Auftrennung des Gebäudes in 3 Gebäude ?
opendcc (2022-03-11 23:44:02+00:00): Wo wurde dieser mechanical Edit diskutiert? Zudem sollte vielleicht das wiki _vorher_ auf Stand bringen.
drivec (2022-05-11 01:03:18+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
drivec (2022-05-11 01:01:05+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
Rainero (2022-03-13 09:39:22+00:00): Revert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118422636 : undiskutierter Massenedit. Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75105
Rainero (2022-03-13 09:43:01+00:00): Revert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118422715 : undiskutierter Massenedit. Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75105
Rainero (2022-03-13 10:04:37+00:00): Revert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118423300 : undiskutierter Massenedit. Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75105
Rainero (2022-03-13 10:11:07+00:00): Revert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118423458 : undiskutierter Massenedit. Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75105
Rainero (2022-03-13 10:19:09+00:00): Revert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118423726 : undiskutierter Massenedit. Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75105
AndersAndersson (2022-03-14 15:55:40+00:00): Hello

Why did you remove that this is a suspension bridge?
Ottonormalverbraucher (2022-03-15 20:47:42+00:00): I have added an addition to the properties of the suspension bridge after your hint, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118526826
AndersAndersson (2022-03-16 21:09:24+00:00): Great!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-15 10:38:44+00:00): These buildings are duplicated. Please fix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118380356
SherbetS (2022-03-15 12:55:11+00:00): Damn mapwithai
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-15 14:45:50+00:00): I haven't had any issues.
SherbetS (2022-03-21 16:37:02+00:00): Hello Spaghetti Monster,

I have repaired the damage done to the data I added in this changeset. I'm not sure what happened, but before I uploaded in JOSM, something got botched when I uploaded, so the buildings were duplicated. You can see the fix at changeset/118743527
Mashin (2022-03-12 01:32:55+00:00): Please don't do that again.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-21 11:13:33+00:00): You might be interested in https://github.com/systemed/tilemaker/issues/398#issuecomment-1073749981 , which discusses https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13915560 .
Janjko (2022-07-07 11:31:15+00:00): Vidim da je ovo prebačeno u construction prije 4 mjeseca, jel moguće da je još pod izgradnjom?
Vedran V (2022-07-07 12:13:37+00:00): Još uvijek, kao i komad Školske ulice.
Svaka 2-3 dana prođem biciklom tuda pa pratim razvoj situacije.
Janjko (2022-07-07 12:54:16+00:00): Hvala! Vidim greške za bus linije koje tuda prolaze, pa zato pitam. Vjerojatno busovi onda idu okolo. Neću ništa mijenjati jer će se vjerojatno uskoro vratiti na staro.
Vedran V (2022-07-07 12:58:55+00:00): Vjerujem da će do 1.8. biti gotovo, ako ne i prije. Početkom ovog tjedna su postavili rubnjake tako da bi asfalt mogao vrlo brzo.
surveyor54 (2022-03-13 08:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118420643 where the changeset comment is: Dieser Massenedit war nicht angemeldet und ist inhaltlich auch nicht korrekt. Deshalb ist ein Revert notwendig.
JJIglesias (2022-03-11 23:52:04+00:00): PAREN DE MODIFICAR VILLA PORVENIR. Si siguen haciendo ediciones INCORRECTAS, Voy a iniciar el Proceso para que les Baneen su cuenta de usuario. Asi o mas claro?
tux67 (2022-03-12 07:24:01+00:00): Hi  hmkaiser,

Ist das hier ein "Automated Edit"? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Wenn ja - wo wurde das announced? 
Gruß
tux67
user_12328418 (2022-03-12 07:33:59+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75105

War da nicht schon einmal etwas mit Kirchen und Revert?
streckenkundler (2022-03-12 10:03:03+00:00): @FreiTal: ja: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74775
ivanbranco (2022-03-13 10:45:55+00:00): Hi TrekClimbing,

just curious, what's the exact meaning of place=building_complex? You're the only one using this tag. It seems quite generic to me, it could be added to almost any landuse=residential, retail, commercial ecc.
TrekClimbing (2022-03-13 14:50:49+00:00): Hi ivanbranco

Thanks for asking. Yes, I'm sort of trying it out before asking much more widely about it, although I've mentioned it on talk-gb.

I'm using it for a named group of buildings. As you've seen this can often also be the same as an area of landuse and I've tended to include this where possible as named landuse tends to render. There are other cases where the building complex crosses landuses like Richmond Terrace https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036979764 or is a smaller part of an also named landuse like Westfield Mills  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9553059188 in Westfield Industrial Estate.
These named building complexes are often used in postal addresses but can be hard to add to the map without an approach such as this.

Hope that helps,
TC
user_5359 (2022-03-12 16:57:55+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039448340. What is the meaning of the tag CLASSREF = VT356_0000126859?
AndersAndersson (2022-03-14 15:58:15+00:00): Hello

It seems odd that this bridge should be tractype=grade3 since it is made of metal. How did you come to that conclusion?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011106105/history

Also that this ditch crosses a lake seems odd.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669188995/history
Ottonormalverbraucher (2022-03-15 21:27:41+00:00): The tracktype=grade3 of the [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011106105 bridge 1011106105] is the continuation of the path [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196598900 196598900], which I believe emerges from the Bing aerial maps. If a different track type is desired, this can of course be changed.

The "ditch" [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669188995 669188995] is the connection of the ditch to the river-waterway [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217904496 217904496].
Mashin (2022-04-13 12:43:12+00:00): Nice job!
Mashin (2022-04-13 12:43:44+00:00): thanks!
Rainero (2022-03-12 09:00:10+00:00): Hallo hmkaiser,  
du hast hier eine Menge slurry_tanks umgetaggt, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894258418  
Das etablierte Tagging ist man_made=storage_tank + content=slurry oder building=slurry_tank.  Du hast nun ein nicht etabliertes man_made=slurry_tank daraus gemacht.  
Dazu ein paar Fragen:  
1. was ist der Grund dafür, wo wurde das diskutiert?
2. der Umfang des Edits sieht mir nach einem mechanischen Edit aus, wo wurde das diskutiert? 

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
opendcc (2022-03-12 11:05:08+00:00): Hallo,

dabei sind auch Fehler passiert: z.B. die Streusalz-Silos am Flughafen wurden zu Güllebehältern umfunktioniert. Stell ich mir lustig vor, wenn die Flieger beim de-iceing mit Gülle eingenebelt werden. Ich bin für einen Revert!
chris66 (2022-03-12 17:05:12+00:00): Dieser Massenedit war nicht angemeldet und ist inhaltlich auch nicht korrekt. Deshalb ist ein Revert notwendig.
opendcc (2022-03-12 20:05:40+00:00): Mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118411056 reverted.
SekeRob (2022-03-13 09:15:46+00:00): Hi,

Just wrote a bug report on Github. As above shows, there are 21 more warnings, but no such warnings during save-preparation. As you can see on your 'Neis Report'  https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?astraspera, no warning still translate to the 'ignored warning' tally shooting up. You're now past 1000. 

Ciao
SomeoneElse (2022-03-11 23:29:06+00:00): Hello,
You've added a bollard in the middle of a T junction at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/25340253 .  This seems a pretty unlikely location - did you perhaps want to put it on the footpath to the west?
Let me know if you need any help.
Best Regards,
Andy
BCNorwich (2022-03-12 12:29:15+00:00): Hello Nathan, It's good to have new folk editing OSM but the editing should conform to OSM best practice. There seems to be no reason to change the names and reference numbers of these trunk roads. Thus I'm reverting all the changes. If I'm wrong in doing this please comment here giving reasons for your changes. 

If there's something particular you're trying to achieve again please comment here. Perhaps help can be offered.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-03-12 12:38:47+00:00): Hello Nathan, The changes you've made to these motorways doesn't really look right. You've amended the numbering such that there is now on the north and south carriageway a section numbered A23(M) between two sections numbered M23.

I can't see a reason for doing this so I'm reverting the changes. If you have a reason for making this change perhaps you could comment here for discussion.

Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2022-04-13 06:21:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
maraf24 (2022-03-13 21:10:20+00:00): Sklep nie działa, jest "w organizacji".
Mirosław Żylewicz (2022-03-14 13:11:21+00:00): Sklep jeszcze nie został otwarty ale budynek sklepu już istnieje, budowa została ukończona a sam obiekt jest w trakcie zatowarowywania.

Po oficjalnym otwarciu sklepu dodaje się godziny otwarcia.

Proszę nie usuwać informacji, które mogą pomóc w dotarciu do obiektu kurierom, dostawcom, służbom medycznym czy choćby straży pożarnej.

Na konkurencyjnych mapach odnośniki do sklepu już istnieją.
maraf24 (2022-03-14 14:00:09+00:00): Nie rozumiem tego tekstu. O co w nim chodzi?
Skoro, jak piszesz, sklep nie działa, to po co go dodałeś jako działający?
Skoro budowa zostało ukończona, to dlaczego nie oznaczyłeś terenu jako nie w budowie?
Jakie informacje miały niby zostać usunięte?
Na koniec - proszę nie kopiować danych z innych map. Jest to zabronione.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2022-03-14 19:19:23+00:00): Nie kopiuje danych z innych map. Można to bardzo łatwo sprawdzić, gdyż dodaje znacznie więcej informacji o obiektach.

Wspomniałem o "innych mapach" aby uświadomić, że obiekt istnieje i funkcjonuje ale nie sprzedaje jeszcze towarów.

Dodałem tyle informacji ile na chwilę obecną posiadałem. O to przecież chodzi w OSM. Każdy wnosi coś od siebie.
maraf24 (2022-03-14 20:50:12+00:00): Sklep, który nie sprzedaje towarów nie jest sklepem w OSM. I o to w tej sprawie chodzi. Sklep w organizacji można oznaczyć jako disused:shop=, co też zrobiłem.
Nie zgodzę się też z twierdzeniem, że dodałeś tyle informacji, ile posiadałeś, bo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008844194/history - ale to jest już mało istotny szczegół.
user_5359 (2022-03-12 18:41:57+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag StreamOrder = 1 ? The direction of flow of the river is determined by the direction of the path.
OrcaDan (2022-03-12 20:08:04+00:00): Sorry, that was an artifact from pre-processing that slipped through. They have been removed now.