piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
imagico (2017-10-16 14:54:01+00:00): velmyshanovnyi,

you need to verify your edits more diligently otherwise this can only be seen as a mechanical edit/import.  For example at:

https://mc.bbbike.org/mc/?lon=-153.046905&lat=70.038537&zoom=12&num=2&mt0=bing-satellite&mt1=mapnik

the islands in the lake are actually clouds and residual ice.  If you familiarize yourself with the region and use other readily available image sources for verification you can see that.  You don't do anyone a favor by mechanically tracing thousands of lakes this way without checking for such errors.

And you should definitely not use the 15 year old low resolution images in Bing at z12 and below as a basis.  Both Bing and DigitalGlobe have higher resolution and newer images in most of the areas you are working on.  Make use of that.  And it might be good to ask other experienced scanaerial users like Vort and Jake Strine for help with best practice in using such techniques.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-16 23:00:15+00:00): thnx
Takuto (2017-11-14 10:13:49+00:00): Тип дороги не меняется, если она проходит через населенный пункт. Поменяв тип tertiary на residential (улица Бандикова) вы разорвали местную сеть региональных дорог. Поправил.
edvoik (2017-10-15 07:36:25+00:00): Also changed an entrance to a separate POI. Hope that's OK.
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-24 19:27:05+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM. You requested a review. This particular edit looks good :)
.
Please check out the Israeli community here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=33
. 
And check out the IL Wiki too: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Israel
eggie (2017-10-15 08:16:28+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
eggie (2017-10-15 08:22:17+00:00): Tip: Je hebt de vorm van het gras veranderd bij de Prinsesselaan. 
Je zou nu de bron (source=3dshapes)  moeten veranderen naar bv local knowledge.
Doe je dit zelf?
balte (2017-10-15 08:29:34+00:00): thanks voor het welkomst berichtje ;)

en jup, zal hem zelf aanpassen.
Alecs01 (2017-10-15 09:40:07+00:00): Ciao, fai attenzione a quando selezioni una relazione, senza volerlo hai trasformato i confini del comune di Brescia in una relazione di trasporti pubblici (route master), ho corretto.
eggie (2017-10-15 08:53:32+00:00): Wanneer het gewoon een leeg stukje grond is in afwachting van woningbouw kun je er evt. landuse=brown_field van maken. Gaat er gebouwd worden dan landuse=construction en is er gebouwd dan vraag je via het forum een import van de gebouwen aan in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Mapse verder.
majid1359 (2017-10-15 08:36:03+00:00): چرا بانک ملی سمت خیابان مطهری ولی اباد من پاک کردم مکان صحیح را از مپس می ثبت کردم و بانک حکمت ایرانیان هیچکدام در نقشه سافتک وارد نشده است
Supaplex (2017-10-15 08:54:39+00:00): 有公園名字
YiguoDada (2017-10-15 11:57:17+00:00): 查的到的名字有兩個，大苓里公園和民益路兒童公園，但這些似乎也都不是地方政府起的名字。
附近認識的人也都表示該公園沒有名字。
majid1359 (2017-10-15 08:57:02+00:00): کوچه شهید احمد شعبانی ثبت شد
jpennycook (2017-10-21 19:54:45+00:00): Hello Rigi03.

In this changeset, you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463743116/history from highway=bridleway to highway=footway.  The way is tagged as a Public Bridleway.  Was there a reason for restricting this to pedestrians, or was this change a mistake?

Jon
jpennycook (2017-10-21 20:13:10+00:00): Hello Rigi03.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463737562 is also a Public Bridleway.  Can I ask why you changed it from highway=track to highway=footway?

Jon
jpennycook (2017-10-21 20:18:16+00:00): Hello Rigi03.

You also changed Frith Hill Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463737567/history) from highway=track to highway=footway.  I've cycled on this way, and it was a track, hence the source=survey tag.  Can I ask why you downgraded it to a pedestrian path please?

Jon
Constable (2018-01-31 09:35:57+00:00): Also this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285882083 isn't a pool, it's a damn private greenhouse.
Supaplex (2018-01-20 13:29:04+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Nakaner (2017-10-15 22:10:37+00:00): Hi 3vivekb_sjsidewalks_import,

please pause this import and read my posting on the Imports mailing list. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October/005183.html

Could you please add a note to the profile of this account whom this account belongs to?

Best regards

Michael
3vivekb (2017-10-16 04:29:00+00:00): Hey Nakaner I see your email and am replying now.
3vivekb (2017-10-16 04:34:12+00:00): I also added a note to this profile as suggested.
Nakaner (2017-10-19 10:24:49+00:00): I hoped that you start fixing your errors without being asked directly. Unfortunately, I do not see any real progress in this issue. 

Could you please fix your import until 2017-10-21 20:00 UTC? Otherwise I will revert your part of the import because people rely on the quality of OSM and low-quality imports like yours don't help OSM. Pedestrian routing in OSM is currently just crap in San Jose. It was better before your import.
mikelmaron (2017-10-19 16:43:04+00:00): @Nakaner -- You are not in position to demand fixes and threaten reverts. We do not deal with each other in this way in our community -- we work with each other to make a better map, in good faith. From what I can see, your concerns are understood, discussion is happening, and things are moving. 

If you have an issue with this, please take it up officially with the DWG.
jpennycook (2017-10-21 19:52:36+00:00): Hello Rigi03.

In this changeset, you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442110934 and other ways between Red Road and Brentmoor Road from highway=track to highway=footway.  Was this by mistake?
This is a public bridleway - if it was narrow, then it should be tagged as highway=bridleway, otherwise horses won't be able to use it.  However, I've cycled on this way between Red Road and Brentmoor Road, and it was wide enough to drive a carriage or four wheel motor vehicle down, so I think this should be reverted to highway=track.
For reference:-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway - "The tag highway=footway is used for mapping minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians."

Jon
jpennycook (2017-10-21 20:10:27+00:00): Hello Rigi03.

In addition, you changed the track that runs parallel to The Maultway and Red Road from highway=track to highway=footway.  I've used this track, and it's definitely a track.  Could you change it back to highway=track please?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463748050/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361615768
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463748048
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463748051
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361615769
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463748049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361615762/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7286162

Jon
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-15 18:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52962566 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-15 18:36:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52962566 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
jpennycook (2017-10-21 20:04:49+00:00): Hello Rigi03.

In this changeset, you changed the cycle path leading from Kingfield Road to Woking Park, signposted as part of the Mars Cycle Trail, from highway=cycleway to highway=footway, and another one linking the Mars Cycle Trail with the Phobos Cycle Trail.  Can I ask why?  At least the Mars Cycle Trail section is a wide cycle path.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338681867
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338681876
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498925517/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498925511/history

If it was an error, could you fix it please?

Jon
jpennycook (2017-10-21 21:05:35+00:00): Hello Rigi03.

You can see some photos on the CycleStreets photomap around Woking Park here: https://www.cyclestreets.net/photomap/94639/ and here: https://www.cyclestreets.net/photomap/94638
jpennycook (2017-10-21 21:06:00+00:00): Note that the Mars Trail section is also part of the National Cycle Network, route number 223
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-15 18:37:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52962566 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-15 18:37:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52962566 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
Constable (2017-10-16 07:16:48+00:00): Please consider using proper changeset comments when saving your edits!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
thanks
zors1843 (2017-10-20 13:41:52+00:00): Hi,
Private paths belong in openstreetmap.  This is valuable information.  Otherwise armchair mappers could always remap the paths without knowing the access is private.
Thanks,
Georges
Constable (2017-10-16 07:24:57+00:00): la recinzione che hai aggiunto risulta avere punti in comune con le strade lungo le quali si sviluppa, quindi risulta che quelle strade sono sbarrate.
Se vuoi aggiungere la recinzione fallo pure, però evita che la stessa abbia punti in comune con strade/sentieri che nella realtà non blocca, nel caso in questione deve avere punti in comune solo con eventuali strade che accedono alla proprietà (questahttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532676183 e quella sul lato nord della proprietà)
Per favore correggi, se hai problemi scrivi che ti do una mano,
grazie, ciao
Robert Whittaker (2017-10-16 17:15:20+00:00): Are you sure the postcode is correct on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532684269 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532685134 ? According to Code-Point Open there are no postcodes starting "TD11 5".
bwallum (2017-10-16 18:19:58+00:00): Corrected to TD11 3RS, the post code quoted by the occupant. Thanks for spotting my error.
ChrissW-R1 (2017-10-15 10:05:00+00:00): reverted boundaries created in the following changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52715792
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52704697
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52765507
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52765219
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52809643
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52767181
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52873981
toeklk (2017-10-19 19:19:57+00:00): It seems like you removed a path in bertembos 
between the bosstraat and the junction of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325260114#map=19/50.88838/4.62618  and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192530181

which definitely _does_ exist (I've ran there this weekend, and the openstreetmap GPS traces and the strava heatmap agree with my memoy)

Could you please repair the situation?

TIA
toeklk (2017-10-19 19:23:48+00:00): I couldn't find the way back immediately because I was looking for a deleted way, but basically the node deletions between version 1 and two of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192530181/history
toeklk (2017-10-22 20:19:03+00:00): "Reverted" as of Changeset 53161650
Ferux (2017-10-23 18:45:41+00:00): OK I see that the change has been undone, so I suppose I shouldn't do anything anymore.

Bizar that you were able to pass because 2 years ago this path had disappeared (stopped after 10m) as you can see in this pic: http://users.telenet.be/ferux/20150706_212112.jpg
toeklk (2017-10-24 20:04:09+00:00): You shouldn't take any further action indeed.  In your pic, I can still somewhat recognise the single track, but indeed, it is much more clear now
Hjart (2017-10-15 11:44:47+00:00): Jeg har for at få historikken tilbage genoplivet den oprindelige version af Jægersborg kirke og slettet din.
Lytter1 (2017-10-15 13:03:38+00:00): Tak for det, jeg ser i min log at jeg havde et scrpitfejl som nulstillede min software,  har sendt logfil til udvikleren.
M!dgard (2017-10-16 13:23:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982351 where the changeset comment is: revert creation of fictuous elements
mapper999 (2017-10-15 18:03:57+00:00): Was soll denn das sein? Wäre mir neu, dass sich die Volkswohnung umbenannt hat.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-17 21:27:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53025116 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 52951858. Change does not look serious. User has been warned that OSM is not a playground.
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-15 18:36:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52962566 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
FrankXF (2017-10-23 18:36:31+00:00): Und wie kann ich die Änderung jetzt durchfallen lassen? :-))
Nakaner (2017-10-24 08:06:11+00:00): Indem du sie rückgängig machst.
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-10-15 20:13:32+00:00): you will have to excuse me for intricately mapping out the parking areas near Marginal, realigning these ways must have been quite the chore

as GPS and birds-eye view satellite imagery can be unreliable, I will attempt to more accurately map some of these roads... someday
muralito (2017-10-16 02:21:04+00:00): Hi Ewana.

You are copying data from woohands.com to OpenStreetMap?

I can't understand several changes you made. Seems out of place or bad location.

Please reconsider if the additions you are doing are from good data. It seems not.
bdiscoe (2017-10-16 00:50:06+00:00): velmyshanovnyi, you indicated "source=Bing" here, but the features are not from Bing.  See  for example: https://i.imgur.com/CVUVAo8.png  Are they actually from LandSat or something else?  If they are actually created using "scanaerial" from LandSat, then that should also be noted in your changeset.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-16 01:41:15+00:00): server_api = bing
server_name = Bing
server_url = http://dev.virtualearth.net/REST/v1/Imagery/Metadata/Aerial?include=ImageryProviders&output=xml&key=Arzdiw4nlOJzRwOz__qailc8NiR31Tt51dN2D7cm57NrnceZnCpgOkmJhNpGoppU
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-16 01:42:00+00:00): Copyright © 2017 Microsoft and its suppliers. All rights reserved. This API cannot be accessed and the content and any results may not be used, reproduced or transmitted in any manner without express written permission from Microsoft Corporation.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-16 01:44:08+00:00): see/read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Scanaerial
M!dgard (2017-10-16 13:23:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982351 where the changeset comment is: revert creation of fictuous elements
eggie (2018-03-31 20:26:21+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik bij deze 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
nljacob58 (2017-10-15 19:35:21+00:00): Beste Jan
Waarom heb je het adres gewijzigd in Nieuwe Kerkstraat?
Volgens de website en lokale kennis is/was 	Lange Boonestraat 12
3142 CC Maassluis
correct.
Graag herstellen
Groet
Jaap
nljacob58 (2017-10-16 19:01:09+00:00): Na pb Jan Vlek aparte poi node gewist en amenity=restaurant info aan adress tag toegevoegd (change set 52952830)
literan (2017-10-15 12:36:31+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо за правки. Вот этот дом, он, похоже, жилой. А для жилых подъездов лучше использовать специальный тег entrance=staircase
eggie (2017-11-05 21:08:18+00:00): Je hebt hier de adresnode verwijderd. Gebouwen horen geen adres te krijgen Dat zit al op de adresnode. Zou je dit kunnen herstellen?
eggie (2017-11-05 21:31:55+00:00): Je kunt het in dit geval ook wel zo houden, want de amenity is wel gekoppeld aan het adres.
Gatsybah (2017-11-07 12:26:05+00:00): Oke, niks terugdraaien dus
eggie (2017-11-07 12:40:15+00:00): Inrichtingen, scholen en kerken zijn vaak de uitzonderingen die de regel bevestigen, maar in principe de adresnode gebruiken.
Gatsybah (2017-11-07 13:28:23+00:00): En als je de adresnode bedoeld heb je het over de punt-functie, toch?
eggie (2017-11-07 14:35:45+00:00): Ja ... De BAG adresnodes staan helemaal los als knooppunten (node) op alle gebouwen.
M!dgard (2017-10-16 13:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982351 where the changeset comment is: revert creation of fictuous elements
escada (2017-10-16 10:34:35+00:00): Beste, bent u zich ervan bewust dat we enkel geïnteresseerd zijn zoals de situatie nu in werkelijkheid is. Dat u gerust een kaart kan maken met uw ideeëen op bv. umap.openstreetmap.fr, maar dat deze geen plaats hebben in OSM.
Deze kaart wordt gebruikt voor allerlei toepassingen waaronder navigatie, zodat droom scenarios er niet in thuis horen.

Dus gelieve uw fictieve wijzingen stop te zetten.

alvast bedankt
M!dgard (2017-10-16 13:23:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982351 where the changeset comment is: revert creation of fictuous elements
joost schouppe (2017-10-16 15:54:09+00:00): De fictieve wijzigingen zijn teruggedraaid, na overleg op ons [riot kanaal](https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org). Als je in de toekomst échte bijdragen aan de kaart zou hebben, dan zijn die nog steeds bijzonder welkom!
OSM Belgium (2017-10-27 15:06:25+00:00): Dag kàovgyouo,
Aangezien je latere bewerkingen niet constructiever leken te zijn dan de eerdere, hebben we je bewerkingen voorlopig geblokkeerd. U kunt met community@osm.be contact opnemen als je denkt dat je onterecht geblokkeerd bent.
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-15 18:36:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52962566 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
taki3hira (2019-01-11 00:58:31+00:00): 架道橋の名前をつける対象は確かに鉄道の方ですね。修正ありがとうございます！
dmlu (2018-08-16 10:41:54+00:00): Hi, I noticed that you added some address nodes that contain "ref:caclr" keys with an ID that is very different from the caclr dataset i compiled recently. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5168960003 has "ref:caclr"=234097, while the building already has ref:caclr=69446, which is also the ID I have in my version of the caclr dataset. Were you using an old caclr dataset version?
dmlu (2018-08-16 10:47:26+00:00): Looks like the tag got copy-pasted when creating new nodes. I found 8 nodes with the same ID in Frisange. (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/B6m).
aharvey (2017-12-03 09:01:27+00:00): Thanks for fixing this. The name is only meant to contain the name not a description too, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Since it's all one school, it might be better to use a multipolygon relation to have a singe name tag.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:grades
M!dgard (2017-10-16 13:23:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982351 where the changeset comment is: revert creation of fictuous elements
chnav (2017-10-18 12:20:10+00:00): Hi, before changing any names countrywide you should have contact local mappers. Lot of software stuck at the moment.
chnav (2017-10-18 12:27:00+00:00): Please let us know what is you interest in Kazakh names, which are already stored in name:kk
FredrikLindseth (2017-11-24 20:22:46+00:00): This "Ahmaddiyya" sounds like a strange name for the muslim graveyard. Is that is name or is it possily description or denomination or something? Search engines give me no relevant hits
km2bp (2017-11-26 21:44:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48409248  Denne delen av kirkegården er for muslimer. Og har et navn  Ahmadiyya.   Bilde  https://www.flickr.com/photos/jan-tore/4225441971   Hilse!
M!dgard (2017-10-16 13:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982351 where the changeset comment is: revert creation of fictuous elements
Constable (2017-10-16 08:36:28+00:00): Hi there Rigi, please be careful when you edit things because here you delted a important line which was part of those two relations
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/901866
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/901865
Here you can see your edit details
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=52954679
Constable (2017-10-16 08:44:02+00:00): I've just restored that red line, be careful next time please
Rigi03 (2017-10-16 09:12:20+00:00): Hi sorry about that, will take more care next time
Constable (2017-10-16 09:20:24+00:00): no problem sir, thanks for your answer!
majid1359 (2017-10-15 13:10:41+00:00): اصلاح شد
gileri (2017-10-15 21:45:44+00:00): Bonjour,

Que signifie capacity=0 pour un parking à vélos ?

Il n'existe plus ?
tomdereub (2017-10-18 22:30:24+00:00): Oui, la rue est en travaux et il n'existe plus. C'était sur streetcomplete, je ne voyais pas comment l'indiquer autrement...
gileri (2017-10-21 12:54:17+00:00): J'ai retiré le parking à vélo.

En éditeur mobile plus complet il y a Vespucci pour ce genre de modifications
tomdereub (2017-10-21 15:35:57+00:00): Ok, merci !
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:53+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44953944, 44954309, 44954540, 44954768, 44954813, 45018988, 45019099, 45019360, 45019815, 45020306, 45020574, 45020638, 45020821, 45021741, 45021864, 45023809, 45025099, 45025332, 45025629, 45026531, 45027112, 45027388, 45027666, 45043742, 45044518, 45044676, 45044865, 45045082, 45045225, 45045308, 45045367, 45045537.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 21:03:36+00:00): removido
M!dgard (2017-10-16 13:23:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982351 where the changeset comment is: revert creation of fictuous elements
jaap de vries (2017-10-17 11:58:59+00:00): Je geeft overal aan dat de weg al lang is verhard, waarom geef je dat aan? Heb je iets toegevoegd op OSM of gebruik je ctrl c ctrl v voor je commentaar?
eggie (2017-10-17 12:26:13+00:00): PB gestuurd na eerder contact per PB.
Je krijgt geen feedback van OSM zelf. Het zijn medemappers die je om opheldering vragen.
Graag reactie.

Nogmaals PB gestuurd.
jaap de vries (2017-10-17 17:59:40+00:00): reactie van Riny:
Hoi,

Oh ja, het feit dat ik dus nieuw ben en niet zag op een bepaalde site dat de OSM kaart was aangepast, deed me twijfelen of ik het wel goed had gedaan. Vandaar dat ik nog opnieuw een paar keer heb aangepast. Volgens mij is het de laatste keer wel gelukt. Alleen ik kan de aanpassing nog niet zien op een OSM. Ha ha ha, zojuist even gekeken en nu is het wel te zien. Mooi, mijn eerste aanpassing.

Groet Riny.
eggie (2017-10-17 18:07:44+00:00): De rendering duurt gewoon even. beetje in- en uitzoomen wil wel eens helpen of F5.
tracktype=grade2 heb ik verwijderd. Dat hoort alleen op een highway-track. Verder heb ik de weg losgemaakt van het bos. Editor iD plakt snel.
De weg kruist het Defensiekanaal. Is dat een duiker of een brug?
Graag reactie..
eggie (2017-10-17 18:14:14+00:00): ... en proficiat met je aanpassing. :)
DaveF (2018-09-14 21:59:24+00:00): What is "dontimport:fhrs:addrline1" used for?
paulbiv (2018-09-15 17:33:41+00:00): Hi Dave: That's a error.Thanks.
paulbiv (2018-09-15 17:45:51+00:00): Corrected this and checked through the changeset for others
DaveF (2018-09-15 22:13:51+00:00): Hi Paul
Thanks. 
There a few others to clear: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BUM
There's also 'checkfirst' which could do with looking at: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BUO 

Are you aware of the discussions on Talk-GB where it was agreed that only fhrs:id & address data was to be added? Transient info, such as rating, rating date would result in unnecessary maintenance. fhrs:authority is irrelevant as OSM is geospatially aware.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2016_Q4_Project:_Food_Hygiene_Ratings