piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:11:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
tguen (2021-09-28 00:17:10+00:00): For future reference, it was fine the way it was. Having slightly inaccurate landuse is better than none. Tags like landuse=* and natural=wood are not necessarily related to tax lots, so there's no need to divide the areas into lots like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984561459
Frans S (2021-09-17 12:49:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111314050
abrensch (2022-01-30 16:50:49+00:00): Hallo wermak,

glaube da hast Du ein Loch in die Henighuser Strasse gebaut:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9099441689

Schaust Du mal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
wermak (2022-02-03 20:01:23+00:00): Habe es korrigiert. Danke.

Schöne Grüße
Zaneo (2021-09-17 02:15:12+00:00): Before anybody complains, note the "massive bounding box" is adding a note to a way that is like 100km long.
danieldegroot2 (2022-12-26 23:57:24+00:00): Hey kylenz_linz,

One of the peaks you imported may or may not be a duplicate of Mount Erebus. There may be other such cases, but I have not checked this.

respectively
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9099483080/history
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/515093744/history

Regards,

Daniel
❤️‍🔥 (2022-12-27 00:17:21+00:00): Hey, I wasn't sure if this one is a duplicate, since Mount Erebus has a well known elevation of 3794 but this one is 3790... https://static.topo.linz.govt.nz/maps/antarctic/tiff-300-no-logo/ME14_TIFFv1-01.tif I think you're right though, this must be a duplicate. will fix
Hans Thompson (2021-09-17 04:26:01+00:00): Hi. Just wanted to say these peaks are a great improvement. Thanks.
lasagna (2021-10-20 04:00:19+00:00): Hello,

I am surprised that you have tagged some roads with ref=US 101.
California law defines highway 101 as beginning in Los Angeles and extending north ( https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=SHC&sectionNum=401. ), so these streets are not part of it.
Is there some other reason to justify this change?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-23 09:30:59+00:00): Thanks for mapping! Especially in USA help is very useful :)

Note that it is also useful to map buildings, not only businesses - I changed a bit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111581974 where I added building tag on outline and moved business to a separate node
xem0861 (2021-09-28 00:27:58+00:00): Hi there. So I see that all these edits are only fixing wikidata tags I got from the wikidata plugin on JOSM. Should I stop using this?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-28 06:27:10+00:00): It depends on how it works and what it suggests.

If it suggests things like wikipedia=McDonald's / wikidata=Q38076 ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q38076 ) then you can:

(a) report problem to authors of a plugin (let me know if you need help with that) - I really recommend doing it

(b)
- wait for authors to fix plugin
- or fix such things manually before you upload edit (in case of a McDonald's it would be adding brand: prefix, in case of memorial of some disaster it would be adding subject: prefix etc)
- or maybe stop using it

Note that any editing will make occasional mistakes (among my edits there are some things that went really wrong!), so it is more about getting them to acceptable level that avoiding them altogether. Do not worry if your edits are sometimes fixed/improved - this is normal. But if this wikidata plugin keeps recommending many mistaken edits then something should be done about it.
xem0861 (2021-10-07 22:29:05+00:00): It doesn't reccomend brand:wikidata at all. All the tags are just wikidata:. How do I go about contacting the authors? I am however going to stop using the plugin.

So, for future reference when is it better to do brand:wikidata?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-08 06:21:45+00:00): I will give more info later, for now I will just leave links to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:brand:wikidata https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata#Secondary_Wikidata_links https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata
nevw (2021-09-17 07:43:49+00:00): Hi
for the flying fox management area, I removed the polygon nodes from other things such as the motorway and cycleways, added tags to define as a protected area boundary and changed landuse=forest to natural=wood because the forest tags is normally used for forestry managed areas. The mapped wooded area normally bound all the treed area but in this case you have defined the leaf type and cycle and is specific to the use so I have left in the protected area boundary. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood
jleedev (2021-09-17 16:25:50+00:00): It would appear that these roads are visible in Esri Clarity but are absent from more recent imagery including Bing, Esri, and PEMA, which suggests to me that they no longer exist. Can you explain what's going on here in more detail?
DUGA (2021-10-27 13:03:16+00:00): Hi,

The road you added as Cochran Ave was removed since 2014 when the new building came up.

Several of your edits are completely nonsense and they cannot be verified.
ovruni (2021-09-17 05:16:41+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios nuevamente ha ingresado el texto "Calle" y ha consistido en borrar un nodo existente, agregar un nodo con un valor no existente para la clave office [0] y man_made=courtyard [1] no existentes. Por otra parte le invito nuevamente a revisar la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [2]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:office
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man made=courtyard
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
felipeeugenio (2021-09-17 12:47:32+00:00): Hola. Puedes cuadrar los buildings con la letra Q. yo lo hago ahora.

una duda. editas para poder jugar pokemonGO o alguna app similar?

saludos
Juan Pablo Meza (2021-09-21 13:41:59+00:00): Hola, solo edito porque me gusta la cartografía y soy oriundo del lugar. Saludos
NKA (2022-04-02 16:58:03+00:00): Du har importert 20 stedsnavn til Nord-Aurdal kommune i dette endringssettet. De må ha blitt flyttet flere kilometer fra en helt annen kommune før de ble lastet opp. Eksempel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9099808586/history

Det er også en del place=isolated_dwelling i Etnedal kommune som ligger helt feil. De har nok også blitt flyttet. Eksempel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9099886465/history

Fint om du kan rydde opp i dem - bare å søke opp "ref:hovedgruppe" (forøvrig en tag som ikke skal lastes opp til OSM).

Jeg har fjernet tilsvarende stedsnavn som hadde havnet i Øystre Slidre.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
skyper (2021-09-18 12:02:49+00:00): Hallo Vika
Wenn Du Kreisverkehre aufteilst, kannst Du bitte auch sie Route-Relationen entsprechend anpassen!
Zumindest die beiden Buslinien sind jetzt beschädigt (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-TGO-Analysis.html#bus_113). Kannst Du bitte noch einmal alle Relationen überprüfen?
Generell wäre ich vorsichtig beim aufteilen von Linien mit iD. Da gibt es seit längerem einige Probleme was Route-Relationen angeht.

Eine andere Frage ist, warum Du die Relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9882030) gelöscht hast, anstatt sie für eine der beiden neu angelegten zu verwenden (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984177456 bzw. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984177457).

Mit fragenden Grüße,
skyper
Ein weiteres Thema
Vika_Nosovich (2021-09-20 12:41:32+00:00): Hello, skyper!
Thank you for your comment. My edit was bad. I reverted this changeset. You can check it out here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111445968
I will try to make edits on OSM more carefully.
Thank you for your interest and contribution to the common cause!
skyper (2021-09-20 16:34:10+00:00): Naja, da war nicht allzu viel falsch, nur alle Route-Relationen waren beschädigt. Habe nun selbst den Kreisverkehr aufgeteilt und die von Dir neu erstellten Objekte verwendet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111454029

Was Du genau am Kreisverkehr ändern wolltest (außer der Abbiegverbotserelation) bleibt mir weiterhin schleierhaft.

Grüße skyper
Vika_Nosovich (2021-09-21 08:42:37+00:00): Hello, skyper!
I wanted to fix the turn restriction. Thus, I have broken other route relations.
I am always open to dialogue and ready to accept constructive criticism.
Best regards, Vika.
skyper (2021-09-21 13:18:53+00:00): Hi Vika
Für den Restriction-Relationen muss der Kreisverkehr doch gar nicht aufgeteilt werden.
Mit iD kenne ich mich nicht aus, aber JOSM gibt zumindest einen direkten Hinweis, wenn Relationen mit verändert werden. Da iD noch andere Probleme in diesem Bereich hat, ist es vielleicht besser generell JOSM anstatt iD zu verwenden.
Ciao skyper
Vika_Nosovich (2021-09-21 13:46:29+00:00): skyper, thank you for your recommendation. I will think about it.
Best regards, Vika.
skyper (2021-09-23 11:08:43+00:00): Scheinen ja beides nicht so seltene Probleme zu sein, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111441980.
Vika_Nosovich (2021-10-05 13:26:07+00:00): Hello, skyper!

Yes. This is a known problem. We will make a decision with the team on this matter.

Best regards, Vika
You can read more here
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8578
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4861#issuecomment-378481051
skyper (2021-10-09 14:04:57+00:00): Hi Vika
Thanks for the links but I fear there are more problems as a quick search on the open issues about turn and route relations show.
I still miss a ticket about iD not updating turn relations but deleting the old one and creating a new one but maybe I did not search deep enough.
Anyway, all these problems show me, that iD might not be the best editor to use, atm, especially if working on relations.
Take care
skyper
Vika_Nosovich (2021-10-19 15:48:02+00:00): Hi skyper

We are looking for solutions to the problem at the moment since this is really not correct. I understand your concern.
Thanks for your involvement!

Best regards,
Vika
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:04:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:04:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-09 00:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115928159 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-09-17 12:41:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
See my previous commetn about squaring and nodes.
Here in particular are high buildings. They needs to be mapped over the rooflines and moved to their footprints.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111321652
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
mdgabriel (2021-09-17 10:22:06+00:00): hi. thank you for the correction you made. i have overlooked this error.
Jenn_Bh (2021-09-17 11:16:54+00:00): Hello mdgabriel, thank you!
JeroenHoek (2021-09-17 10:07:10+00:00): Lekker bezig met de boerenpaden!

Kleine opmerking: bij de meeste boerenpaden zijn het geen bruggen waar ze over de sloot gaan, maar duikers. Daar loopt het water in een pijp door onder de grond. In OSM teken je die niet in als bridge.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Jakka (2021-09-18 08:06:23+00:00): So that path can not be followed futher, no gate .... think better cut that path @ fence
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-09-17 12:40:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Do not include the shadow or a yard in your mapping. 
Do not connect nodes to each other

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111322488
eggie (2021-09-17 07:38:27+00:00): Dag jamezzz,

Me t gebouwen is iets bijzonders aan de hand. Die zijn allemaal directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Daar kun je beter niets aan veranderen.
Bedrijven, instellingen, artsen taggen we bij op de adresnode (ook import)
Dus niet op de gebouw omtrek.
Het Kadaster ziet het als één gebouw.. Net als in een appartementencomplex met ook veel aparte eenheden. 
De artsenpraktijk met name=....  dus bijtaggen op de adresnode.
Ik zal even het gebouw herstellen. De vorm klopt ook niet meer.
Moment.
eggie
eggie (2021-09-17 07:40:36+00:00): reverted by changeset #111323675

Nu kun je de artsenpraktijk de adresnode bijtaggen. Die mag je ook gewoon verschuiven.
Luchtfoto's kloppen niet door schuingenomen opnames.

Succes
eggie