piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2022-08-25 22:31:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-25 11:52:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contribution, looks good 👍
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:48:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
aTarom (2022-08-25 06:30:33+00:00): Hello, one question please, is more appropriate
"destination:ref"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30326767/history
instead of
"direction:ref"
?
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088950929/history
Greetings and thanks for editing
Bicycle Tourer (2022-08-25 07:53:05+00:00): Many thanks for catching this. I just fixed it.
jtracey (2022-08-28 21:25:25+00:00): Please do not add nodes for items already tagged as ways. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
carter_oswald (2022-08-28 21:33:12+00:00): Sorry about that, didn't know this rule thanks for clarify.
The reason I did is cause the node would make the park more visible from a viewers point of view just scrolling by vs render height of the outline so that it would be less harder to find a park
gdaroadtrip (2022-08-25 01:08:20+00:00): My bad!  I learned something new today.  
WI_FI is a trademark name of WLAN devices
gpserror (2022-08-29 13:46:35+00:00): We don't accept sedition on OSM :D
just kidding around, yeah I wish we can fix typos on our changeset notes but I thought it was funny :)
sgr (2022-08-26 09:18:40+00:00): Hi! Es gibt zur Frage des Tagging dieses Geländes als `landuse=military` eine bestehende Diskussion unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2149286 – zusätzliche Argumente und Sichtweisen sind willkommen :)
DrVaust (2022-08-27 17:07:44+00:00): Hi sgr,
danke für den Hinweis, hatte die Diskussion nicht gesehen. 
Wollte vor allem das technische Problem auflösen: Zaun als Linie und die eigentliche Fläche je in ein eigenes Objekt überführen. Die entsprechende Standort-Relation könnte noch ergänzt werden.

Eine klarere Darstellung könnte vielleicht sein, military=danger_area zu belassen (es sind hier meist "militärische Gefahren" zu erwarten), aber landuse=military zu löschen und amenity=police zu setzen. Werde das mal testhalber tun und die Anmerkungen von iD (und der Community) abwarten. Bei besseren Ideen: bitte rückmelden oder einfach überschreiben/ändern!

Nochmals: danke!
Gruß
DrVaust
CoyKoi (2022-08-25 07:37:02+00:00): Hi Chris, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contributions. I've reviewed this changeset and your others from today, all looking good. Nice to see descriptive changeset comments, too.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125337316
schwukas (2023-05-18 10:46:33+00:00): Hi, not sure why this way was changed from highway=footway to highway=service. According to the road sign ("Zeichen 270" and "Zusatzzeichen 1026-32")[0] this should be tagged as highway=path, bicycle=designated, pedestrian=designated, psv=yes. Please enlighten me. Thanks!

[0] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_seit_2017
osm-pt-account 😎 (2023-05-28 12:05:01+00:00): I changed the way to highway=path.

Regards,
osm-pt-account 😎
DiogoBaptista98 (2023-12-15 14:26:32+00:00): Morgado do Arge e não Morgado do Agre
topolusitania (2023-12-15 23:14:31+00:00): ok corrigido
Palolo (2022-10-25 13:56:07+00:00): Thank you for the help mapping. Please make sure to follow the task instructions. This is a buildings only project, roads are not needed. Thank you
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-27 18:14:17+00:00): Hello!

You used
tee=blue 2
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087222161/history

Have you maybe meant
tee=blue
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
tastrax (2026-03-29 07:09:57+00:00): Hi Mateusz,

If you check the history you will see I was changing the incorrect name tagging but adding the tee key. It may well be correct but only the original editor will know.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-06 10:40:33+00:00): tee is supposedly intended to have colour as value if I read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tee?uselang=en correctly

would

> Do not put the hole number in name=* in accordance on How not to map on Key:name, use a ref=* to reference hole. 

be relevant here?
Dodko (2022-08-25 07:46:52+00:00): Je to len chybný pokus?
Priama cyklocesta nenapojená nikde a z lesnej cesty ste urobili most.
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-29 15:03:57+00:00): Hi, it looks like you added noname=yes to six ways in the Andover/Columbia/Willimantic area, but they still have a name tag? For example 700683946
Jmapper007 (2022-08-29 18:08:26+00:00): That was not me who added the noname that would be Jnighan, who deleted the road names in the first place.
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-29 18:14:43+00:00): Ah whoops, yeah other way around. Still you added the name tag, which is incompatible with the existing noname tag -- I see the other discussion now, I will comment there too
angys (2023-02-28 18:52:57+00:00): Why upper case?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Warin61 (2022-08-26 00:10:03+00:00): Hi,
Some of these look a little off square. One has duplicated nodes causing the building to cross itself ... that is an error that should be fixed. Ideally it should have been fixed before upload. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.91631&lat=-31.99583&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Mashin (2022-08-25 11:53:08+00:00): Hi Andy,
thanks for contributing, but are those streets really for private use only? We typically mark road as access=private when there is a No Trespassing sign or an entrance gate. From satellite imagery there seems to be several cars driving or parking on that street.
Andy Cable (2022-08-25 12:47:46+00:00): When I got to Miller Street, I saw a man walking a dog on East Grand Street, and a sign that I presumed to be a "private Road" sign, so I didn't go down East Grand Street.  I didn't get close enough to the sigh to read the text.
Andy Cable (2022-08-25 12:58:38+00:00): Grom Google Maps, it looks like East Grand Street is public, and should end at house 19. Salt Acre Road starts right after 19 East Grand Street, and is private.

My change is not correct, and I'm not sure how to lengthen Salt Acres Road and shorten East Grand Street.
Mashin (2022-08-25 19:28:46+00:00): It seems you are right that the E Grand Street ends at house #19. I can see the same on [Stonington GIS portal](https://gis.stonington-ct.gov/ags_map/). I split the road and renamed the eastern half to Salt Acres Road. Thanks for bringing this to attention.
[Bing Streetside](https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=41.334939~-71.902559&lvl=17&dir=244.805&style=x&v=2&sV=1) from June 4, 2015 shows three signs: Causion Drive slowly,  Dead End and Causion Children at Play. Could that be what you saw?

In iD you can split roads by selecting one of its nodes/points then right clicking on it and selecting "Split". 
Also It's not good to use Google Maps because they are copyrighted. But one can use Bing Street Side or Mapillary. Just press "U" in iD and select them from the menu.

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
user_5359 (2022-08-28 08:21:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the newest version of your data for the correct driveway notation.
Swihail (2022-08-29 10:06:48+00:00): Hi  user_5359, thank you for correcting the tag. Going forward, I will refer the basemap.at Orthofoto source.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-04 23:05:07+00:00): Quitaste el nombre de las aldeas aquí. ¿Por qué hiciste esto? Creo que se trata de revertir este conjunto de cambios.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
user_5359 (2022-08-30 18:09:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065131669/history. Please notice admin_level=2 is reserved for a country. the lower level is for bigger object (like a Continents). 
Please correct this value.
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
John Kastner (2022-08-26 13:27:36+00:00): Looking at you're cited source (DC imagery)  and from personal experience, some of paths you deleted definitely do exist.

I don't know off hand if these are official maintained park trails. Assuming they're not (and that this is why you removed them), they still should not be unilaterally deleted when they do exist on the ground.
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-08-26 13:40:42+00:00): Hi! We have received the feedback from user that left a comment with sources DC Water and NPS for removing these trails.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
opendcc (2022-08-25 14:21:16+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Bitte beachten Sie, dass es bestimmte Regeln gibt, wie was getagged werden soll. Diese Regeln können Sie gerne auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org nachlesen, insbesondere dass der Name wirklich der Eigenname eines Objektes ist ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name ). Ergänzend sei angemerkt, dass es ziemlich störend wäre, wenn in der Karte bei jeder Wirtschaftseinheit die volle Rechtsform auftauchen würde: sie kaufen ja auch bei Aldi ein und nicht bei ALDI SÜD Dienstleistungs-SE & Co. oHG. Graphisch hat man wenig Platz und für die Navigation (ja, dafür nutzt mah Karten!) sind Adressen wichtiger als Rechtsformen von Häuserbenutzern.

Deshalb habe ich das Nametagging auf dem building reverted.

Viele Grüße 
Wolfgang
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
lefuturiste (2022-08-26 09:24:00+00:00): Bienvenu à toi !