piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2022-12-14 19:30:31+00:00): Sorry about that.... I go by the rule of "change it, own it". On your suggestion, looked in Turbo overpass and found a wiki link describing type=watershed, 2500 uses. most in France, few in the Americas, none in the Alpine region,  
Utilisation does not require a closed loop albeit, the function is truly to capture the different flows that combine into the water collection that goes out the waterway into a lake, sea or ocean.
I have my doubt of the correct use here, it seems to infer a large area outline from where all water runs down eventually into the Med/Adriatic, No actual waterways have been tagged, in fact it would be a monster job to do that.
I see what the originator intended.

Anyway, I've change the type, now I own it and see what nukes will come down.

ciao
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:02:52+00:00): fyi. Not all buildings squared.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127571507
SHARCRASH (2022-10-15 13:29:16+00:00): + new elements
gurglypipe (2022-10-17 08:58:55+00:00): Hi, did you mean to set the width of the cycleway to zero? From memory it’s more like 1.5-2m wide along this stretch. Is width=0 supposed to mean something special? Ta :)
gurglypipe (2022-10-19 10:10:12+00:00): I’ve changed it to width=2 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127771838, since I guess width=0 was an accident. Please say if you disagree!
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:21:15+00:00): See my comment no changeset 127572242
Use as little nodes to draw the rooflines.  They are mostly rather straight. 
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127571715
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:12:00+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.

Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Both changesets are very accurate mapped. 
My compliments. 

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127571757
Frans S (2022-10-16 08:26:52+00:00): Hello. Please square your mapping please.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127571777
Frans S (2022-10-15 13:59:41+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper.
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
I reviewed all your changesets issues till now. 
Rather accurate mapped. 
Just tag buildings as building=yes. Nothing more.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127571799
Frans S (2022-10-15 13:53:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. We welcome you as a new mapper. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
I reviewed all your changesets till now. At the first 5 changesets, your mappings were a bit sloppy, but the last changesets were fair mapped. Pay more attention on squaring the mappings.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127571815
literan (2022-10-16 17:56:53+00:00): там сделали сквозной проезд на парковке? в мае еще не было https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CCUZy8ClLC
samsomus (2022-10-17 05:54:30+00:00): с мая полгода прошло. Уложили асфальт и сделали проезд. Но сегодня утром увидел, что ленточку протянули, хотя месяц проезд был свободный. Как будет далее не знаю, но сейчас именно так
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:06:40+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper. 
I am a member of the global validation team and review changesets.
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
A few minor issues.
Some buildings, partially hidden under trees, not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines.
You tend to include the shadow of a building in your mapping. (the black line next to the building)

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127572088
bxl-forever (2022-10-16 16:13:50+00:00): Hello,

I don’t think the <L'> string should be part of the name.  Isn’t it rather "name=Îlot Picard"?
https://ecobuild.brussels/nl/projecten/ilot-picard-cohousingproject-voor-huurders/
JhowieNitnek (2022-10-16 18:37:08+00:00): The company who is running the building uses the L
https://vicinity.be/project/lilot-picard/
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:17:53+00:00): We welcome you as a new mapper. Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Despite the very clear imagery, you did not follow the rooflines accurate. Most buildings are fair rectangular. Also, you did not square the rectangular buildings. 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127572242
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:49:46+00:00): Hello.
Here you added a path onto a mounting without a trace on the ground.
Why? Just map paths and roads which shows proof on the imagery
Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 14:24:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3303091868/history has shop = machinery that was added in this edit
shop=machinery ? What kind of machines? Industrial machines? Washing machines? Computers? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is needed). Or is it not actually a place where you can walk in and buy stuff? But rather internal company office tagged as office=company?
ticki_52 (2025-05-15 14:51:54+00:00): Hi Mateusz, please see CS #166309011
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 16:45:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166309011
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 16:45:58+00:00): thanks for a fix!
GUFSZ (2023-01-31 11:17:07+00:00): , eventuell auch Hinweis, ob die Ausschilderung unabhängig von der regulären Radwegweisung ist.

Siehe https://www.regionalpark-rheinmain.de/portfolio-item/regionalpark-safari-von-zoo-zu-zoo/

Gehört zu den Regionalparkrouten

 Ich habe keine Routeneinschübe auf einem Teilstück gesehen.

Die Relation ist 25km lang.  Ginge es genauer?
osmviborg (2022-10-15 14:57:09+00:00): 'mini_roundabout' 
"Description: A road junction where the traffic goes around a painted circle or traversable island and has right of way". Hvorfor opgraderer du?
DK7080BE (2022-10-15 17:12:40+00:00): Rundkørslen er blevet ombygget med 6 stråler af brosten som bliver højere og højere ind mod midten af rundkørslen, så man ikke længere kan køre direkte over under normale forhold
osmviborg (2022-10-15 19:28:25+00:00): 👌
Syl (2022-12-02 15:41:05+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai enlevé que ce cabinet est un hôpital, ça n'a pas l'air d'être le cas.
kinemartin (2022-12-02 17:22:52+00:00): Bonjour,
effectivement ce n'est pas un hôpital mais il n'existe pas d'icône pour les cabinets de kinésithérapie/physiothérapie. Il faudrait en créer une mais je ne sais pas comment faire.
Syl (2022-12-02 18:31:10+00:00): Malgré son nom OpenStreetMap n'est pas une carte, c'est une base de données.
La carte standard visible sur openstreetmap.org n'est qu'un exemple d'utilisation de ces données. Des choix ont été faits concernant ce qui est rendu et effectivement certaines structures de santés ne le sont pas. Ça à l'air d'avoir été discuté et l'ajout ne semble pas prévu, voir notamment ici une discussion en anglais : https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4235

Mais les données sur le cabinet sont bien présentes dans OSM et peuvent être utilisées par d'autres cartes/applications/sites...
Il n'y a rien de plus à modifier dans les données, ce qui est dans OSM est déjà correct.

Merci pour vos contributions.
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:39:51+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:39:53+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:39:54+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:39:55+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:39:57+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:39:59+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:40:01+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:40:02+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
MxxCon (2022-10-18 02:25:17+00:00): Hello.
Do yo uhave more details about this shop?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127573899
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:40:05+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-10-17 12:33:39+00:00): Hi,

You changed the pedestrian road in the middle of the park from "pedestrian" to "track". A 'track' is mostly meant for 'land access', i.e. tractors going to their fields. This road in the park is a nice, wide pedestrian (and cyclists)-route, hence the 'pedestrian'-classification.

What is the reason of your change?

Kind regards,
Pieter
Winschu (2022-10-17 13:54:40+00:00): Hi, that was clearly an error from the app that I was using I've changed it back to what it was before
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-10-17 15:15:29+00:00): Thanks!
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:40:06+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:40:08+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:40:10+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Ze0zohk1 (2022-10-15 14:40:12+00:00): Korrekt source ist "survey"
Frans S (2022-11-19 10:37:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping as we welcome you a new mapper.
A few remarks on your mapping of roads.
Tagging of roads need to be done in according to this wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
Do not over extract. Especially in roads / rivers networks, there may be many paths / streams in the imagery. You are not requested to map them all, and most of the time you can trace only the main ones as explained in the instruction.
Main roads are to be tagged as highway=unclassified in general
Don't tag a name like tertiary or main road
Only when you have local knowledge, you can tag names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127574170
ivanbranco (2022-11-02 21:57:37+00:00): Hi Angelinux,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6077525802

was the deletion of all these tags intended?
Unbeatable101 (2022-10-15 16:42:12+00:00): Hi, could you tell me why you removed the church? I bike by a few weeks ago and it was there
Controlled-access (2022-10-15 18:08:38+00:00): Are you sure it was this church? Bing arial view and Google Street View (June 2022) show the structure being removed.
Unbeatable101 (2022-10-15 18:16:23+00:00): Oh sorry, I thought this was on mountain street
Car162 (2022-10-15 15:20:26+00:00): Again, After the opening of the metronit routes in August 2013, both the strait ahead and left turn from the Hel HaYam and both the strait ahead and left turn from Sderot James De Rotschild don't have a separate traffic lights. If unsure you can go to that junction to check
Car162 (2022-10-15 15:20:50+00:00): See comment, @Sokuya
Sokuya (2022-10-19 01:27:38+00:00): This is the way the lanes are in reality, the 4 lanes on the top are divided to two different paths (north west side of the junction) because there is a permanent continues white dividing line separating the two lanes for left turn and two lane for forward turn. so we can't merge them into one path of 4 lanes. because of the permanent dividing line they are considered 2 different paths of 2 lanes each starting from the rail bridge down to the junctions. this is validated by 2015 google street view, 2022 GIS website and govmap.gov.il satellite imagery (and also simplex-smart3d.com)

Regarding the south part of the junction of James Rothschild road, there is 2 different traffic light: one for the 2 lanes with forward turn from the south Rothschild into north Hel HaYam, and 2 other lanes for left turn from Rothschild into HaHagana, so you can't combine this 4 lanes into 1 path. there need to be 2 different paths (each with 2 lanes) cause there two different traffic lights. this is also this is validated by 2015 google street view, 2022 GIS website and govmap.gov.il satellite imagery (and also simplex-smart3d.com)
Sokuya (2022-10-19 01:36:47+00:00): this is more proof to the 2 separate traffic lights with video capture on the ground (one light for left turn and one for go ahead) https://youtu.be/QUP8cwPI-io?t=619
Sokuya (2022-10-19 01:37:11+00:00): the video captured in 2020
Car162 (2022-10-19 15:27:12+00:00): Note that the right turn and strait ahead and metronit route from Hel HaYam street don't have a separate lanes
Car162 (2022-10-19 15:51:28+00:00): Here is a photo of note: 
https://www.google.com/maps/@32.8285732,34.9841442,3a,75y,208.04h,80.69t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1swfAr4YDIvT6jDG0Z0WCkDw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Sokuya (2022-10-19 20:26:08+00:00): this road marking is so confusing. it looks like a they transform a regular broken dividing line into unbroken consecutive dividing line https://www.driverknowledgetests.com/resources/road-markings-rules-and-types/. Also in the picture you added you can see there is two separate traffic light one for each two lanes. The two left lanes have traffic light for left turn and there is other traffic light for the two right lanes for go ahead and right turns. So its needs to be two separate paths, not one merged path of 4 lanes
silversurfer83 (2022-10-15 19:44:36+00:00): Moin Schlumpfhasenbär,

wenn Du fröhlich Daten löscht möchte ich Dich darum bitten deine Änderungen etwas besser zu begründen, als mit dem von Dir genutzten Satz im Kommentar.
Außerdem gebe ich vielen Nutzern, die Daten löschen noch den Hinweis auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix mit auf den Weg.
Cheers
silversurfer83
Schlumpfhasenbär (2022-10-15 21:38:31+00:00): Ein freundliches Hallo vom Jagdhaus!
Das weiß ich, weil ich hier vor Ort wohne und nahezu täglich hier im Forst mit dem Mountainbike unterwegs bin, und die derzeitigen massiven Forstarbeiten begleite. Dabei ärgere ich mich fast täglich über das bescheidene Kartenmaterial. PS: Vom Harvester oder Rückezug entstandene Spuren sind keine Wege!

Grüße und guts Nächtle, Christian Tröster
SekeRob (2022-10-15 15:58:43+00:00): Cooment falsely copied from previous edit set, this actually landcover qualifications on the Majella.
jeslop (2022-10-17 17:50:34+00:00): Hola guiigdks, bienvenido a OSM.

Lee esto antes de seguir mapeando: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Saludos.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
nyampire (2022-10-20 07:46:48+00:00): OSMへようこそ！編集をレビューしました。

とてもよく描けていると思います。
付与されているタグもバッチリです。
この調子で、いろいろな地物を描いてみてください。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127577409
tastrax (2022-10-28 10:51:18+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
eggie (2022-10-15 18:47:44+00:00): Dag ReinJans..

Je vraagt feedback
Je zult als je het goed wilt doen de onfo van de adresnode in Bedum moeten verwijderen en moet kopieren of opnieuw invoeren aan de 	Oeverkruid in Groningen.
Het bedrijf schiet niet automatisch naar het nieuwe adres op de kaart.
Nu is ook het oude adres Grotestraat 58 verdwenen.. terwijl dat in feite nog bestaat.
Ik zal even het oude adres herstellen.
MVG 
eggie
ReinJans (2022-10-15 18:51:08+00:00): Dank voor het goede opletten en de reactie!
eggie (2022-10-15 18:54:39+00:00): De info heb ik overgezet naar het nieuwe adres. Paar keer ctrl-f5 toetsen voor effect.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-15 18:55:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.24589/6.57584
ReinJans (2022-10-15 18:59:33+00:00): Hartelijk dank voor de moeite!
maciek-szn (2022-10-15 16:57:18+00:00): Wycofane - zegar jest już naniesiony na mapę.
hetmantom (2022-10-15 17:04:57+00:00): Jest to pewien problem bo na mapach zegar się nie wyświetla jako punkt bo jest dla nich niewidoczny jako atrakcja. Tylko punkty są wyświetlane jako atrakcje turystyczne do kliku z opisem. Czy ta odpowiedź ma dla Ciebie sens? Chodzi o mapsme oraz osmand a pewnie i inne mapy co korzystają z OSM.
maciek-szn (2022-10-15 18:26:15+00:00): Nie mapujemy pod render, tzn. pod sposób wyświetlania. OpenStreetMap to przede wszystkim baza danych obiektów. To, jak są wyświetlane (i czy w ogóle są wyświetlane), zależy od autorów poszczególnych stylów wyświetlania. Jeśli chciałbyś, aby zegar wyświetlał się w różnych aplikacjach, powinieneś skontaktować się z ich twórcami.
Langlaeufer (2022-10-15 17:26:54+00:00): Wat denn nu? Du hast 80 eingetragen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127579183
Langlaeufer (2022-10-15 17:28:37+00:00): Ich hab es auf 70 korrigiert.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-16 08:21:04+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Jacques Bichler (2022-10-16 15:23:18+00:00): Hi, yes I would love to! However I didn’t see any comment field in maps.me to add changeset comments. How exactly do I do that?
Frans S (2022-10-16 08:52:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127579354
MxxCon (2022-10-18 02:37:03+00:00): Hello.
MTA's bustime website has (almost accurate) location of every top and you can get bus stop numbers from there as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127579512
Gabe DeFreitas (2022-10-18 03:30:06+00:00): With this route I've found all the stops are "almost" accurate--sometimes there are slight differences between where the local & select buses stop. Regular riders know these differences but they are not captured on a lot of data sources. I will try to add stop codes when I can.
Poxyist (2022-10-17 07:03:47+00:00): Данное изменение не правомерно, изменение границы не согласовано с представителями стран и договора не подписаны на межгосударственных уровнях
Claudio Tam (2024-02-08 15:11:22+00:00): Ciao! la relazione "antica via clodia stage 11" è un itinerario pedonale che in alcuni piccoli punti (tipo: forum clodii) non coincide con la via storica.
Un avventuriero/archeologo potrebbe confondersi pensando di trovarsi sul percorso pedonale/storico mentre si trova sull'altro percorso.
Si potrebbe aggiungere il percorso storico coi tag demolished:highway=yes (manuale d'uso: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nonexistent_features ) e start_date=-0200, end_date=+0800 (manuale d'uso: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenHistoricalMap/Tags ).
Dino Michelini (2024-02-08 17:59:19+00:00): Alcune preciszioni. Così come la Via Francigena o Santiago non percorrono per ovvie ragioni le strade antiche anche questo non fa eccezzione. La tappa 11 ha cai_scale=E perchè lo ha deciso il CAI VT. Nonostante vi siano alcuni utenti molto smaliziati (anche CAI) che vogliono apparire e caricano su social tracce di percorsi escursionistici della Via Clodia, questa tracciata creata da me come vedi ha il tag state=proposed perchè è solo uno studio; nel momento in cui sarà realtà (un cammino con tutti i crismi) si potranno fare tutte le integrazioni sia alle definizioni delle singole route che sulle singole geometrie.