piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2016-04-20 08:58:05+00:00): Beetje hulp verleend. 
Het door jouw aangebrachte pad had (nog) geen aansluiting op het zuid oostelijk gelegen pad. Tevens heb ik een verbindingsnode op het tussenliggende pad aangebracht.

Nu kan een gps of osm app ook routeren over dit pad naar het andere pad.

Veel succes in je nieuwe hobby, je kunt je vragen altijd stellen op het Nederlandstalige gedeelte van het OSM forum, mocht je in de toekomst hulp willen krijgen van mede mappers.

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Commodoortje (2016-04-20 09:00:32+00:00): zuid westelijke pad bedoel ik natuurlijk
SomeoneElse (2016-05-24 16:47:09+00:00): Hello,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4130673501 really a castle?
It doesn't look like one on the Bing imagery...
Best Regards,
Andy
DUGA (2021-05-30 15:11:50+00:00): A service road under canopy in a gas station does not qualify as drive-thru. It is just a road with cover. Or just tagging the roof with at a higher layer.

I'm not sure if you live in US or not, drive-thru is often seen at fast food, bank and laundromat, that people **do not** have to get off their vehicle to receive the service.

In a gas station, unless you live in New Jersey, you have to refill the gas by yourself. You must get off the vehicle.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411407591/history#map=19/38.91202/-78.19331
VictorIE (2026-07-18 17:41:38+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411410142/

Pub inside school?  :D
VictorIE (2026-07-18 17:42:40+00:00): Ah, land from demolished pub added to school.
gaz3434 (2026-07-21 23:44:49+00:00): *thumbs up*

P.S. Didn't your school have a pub?! :D
VictorIE (2026-07-22 00:06:07+00:00): No, not on site. It didn't stop staff and students during lunch though (different pubs).

That said, the school yard of my primary school is now a beer garden.
gaz3434 (2026-07-22 21:57:13+00:00): Is that the beer garden at Bob Stewart’s pub in Drumbeg?
Владимир К (2016-08-22 06:56:55+00:00): формат телефона неверный. надо без скобок и дефисов. +7 85552 12345
Hundehalter (2016-04-24 16:24:49+00:00): hi, ich sehe drei überschneidende Gebäude: Celler Straße 4 und 6. Nummer 6 hat einen dreieckigen Grundriss.
Miselajus (2016-04-18 21:28:53+00:00): Hallo,
die Löschung des Wohngebietes war wohl ein anfängliches Missgeschick, ich habe es inzwischen wieder hergestellt; der Erschließungsweg wurde insofern geändert als der neu eingezeichnete Weg an diesen angeschlossen wurde, insoweit ist diese Meldung korrekt; access=no bedeutet, dass der neu eingezeichnete Weg von niemandem betreten werden darf, trifft das tatsächlich zu? Beispiele und Erläuterungen dazu finden sich auch im Wiki. Vorbildlich finde ich deinen ausführlichen Changeset-Kommentar.
Gruß Miselajus
StefanOrlando (2016-04-18 22:18:32+00:00): Danke Miselajus, habe den Access angepaßt. Bei "alle" hab ich es unbestimmt gelassen und dafür bei allen anderen außer Auto auf "yes" gestellt... Ob das notwendig ist? Ich will damit informieren, dass Autos dort allein aufgrund der Breite des Weges nicht fahren könnten... Ist das eine korrekte Indizierung? Danke für die Hinweise, stefanO
Miselajus (2016-04-19 17:53:21+00:00): Es handelt sich wohl um einen Fußweg/Pfad mit ca. 1 m Breite, hier wäre der Schlüsselwert "Pad" besser als "Weg". Der Schlüsselwert "Pad" beinhaltet auch, dass er für 2-spurige Fahrzeuge nicht geeignet ist.

Hinsichtlich der Zugangsberechtigung für Wege (bei ID: "Erlaubter Zugang") halte ich mich an den Grundsatz: was nicht verboten ist, ist erlaubt, und was erlaubt ist, muss nicht extra aufgelistet werden.

D.h. im konkreten Falle würde ich nachschauen, ob es ein Verkehrsschild gibt, welches die Benutzung eines Weges für bestimmte Nutzergruppen einschränkt.
Gibt es eine solche Einschränkung, nehme ich eine entsprechende Eintragung vor; gibt es sie nicht, gibt es auch keine Eintragung.

Hinsichtlich der verkehrsrechtlichen Beschränkungen und der entsprechenden Eintragungen schaue ich hier nach: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland

Und: Viel Spaß beim mappen
Miselajus (2016-04-19 18:08:36+00:00): Nebenbei: im letzten Post zweimal bei Pfad das "f" vergessen. (und fast schon wieder).
gscholz (2018-01-18 05:35:49+00:00): HI,
your changeset from yesterday has created a harbor reagion with self intersectiing sections:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-80.80797&lat=-0.95596&zoom=16&opacity=0.67

Can you fix this?

Kind Regards
Guido
de vries (2018-01-18 14:04:07+00:00): hi, This changeset is from two years ago. The culprit seems to be https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55526559
see the changes at http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55526559
gscholz (2018-01-18 19:35:15+00:00): Thanks for this learning lesson. I have now fixed it my self.

Guido
silpol (2017-07-04 15:01:25+00:00): SPAM
FTA (2017-07-04 16:48:26+00:00): Hi FlameSenpai,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you have made one change about a year ago, adding a random casino. Please be aware that only real objects should be added to OpenStreetMap. If you have any questions about mapping, please reach out!

Happy Mapping, 
Ethan aka FTA

Koneenkäännös

Hi FlameSenpai,

Tervetuloa OpenStreetMap! Näen, että olet tehnyt yhden muutoksen vuosi sitten lisäämällä satunnainen kasino. Huomaa, että OpenStreetMapiin on lisättävä vain todellisia objekteja. Jos sinulla on kysyttävää kartoituksesta, ota yhteyttä!

Happy Mapping,
Ethan eli FTA
malenki (2016-05-01 07:56:28+00:00): Hi Giblet, in this changeset you added a lot of POI, but quite a few of them with missing main tags. Some examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4131217602 – No clue what this is.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4131217671 – Use machin readable tags. Here healthcare=alternative may apply
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4131217616 – Use "speaking" tags if you need to invent new ones. Don't say "OIC" (whatever this is) but spell the words.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4131217680 – What is this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38675647 – If it is a clinic operated by government, please map it as
amenity=clinic and
operator=government
You managed this on other POI, too. :)


Another hint: it shouldn't be 
opening_hours=by appointment but
opening_hours="by appointment"
e.g. here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4131217656
Giblet (2016-05-02 14:19:01+00:00): Hi makenki, I really appreciate the feedback. I'll start fixing the issues you have highlighted here, and be sure to address them ahead of time before adding future data.

Thank you!
malenki (2016-05-02 18:43:15+00:00): Hi Giblet,
thanks for your quick response and the cooperation. :)
SomeoneElse (2016-05-05 18:56:53+00:00): I notice that you've made this stretch of the 395 into a motorway (and that another user has since changed it back).

Please don't engage in "fantasy mapping" - it's important to map the world as it exists, not as you'd like it to exist.  Certainly the last time I drove that stretch of 395 it couldn't be described as a motorway. It was a few years ago but I can't believe it's all been upgraded (and neither did the mapper who changed it back to trunk).

You were asked back in February (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/892) to not add "guesswork" to OSM.  Please don't - you'll be blocked from mapping if you do.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
R0bst3r (2016-04-20 10:47:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
It would be better to use defined keys, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dline.
FredrikLindseth (2016-04-18 21:35:06+00:00): Hei. Nå justerte du Grønnlien bort fra dens sanne posisjon. Bing har en offset i kartet og er dårlige oppi fjellsider generellt så hvis du offsetter Bing litt evt sammenligner med noe annet så ser du det.
afrihagen (2016-04-19 05:55:02+00:00): Jeg kan delvis være enig, det virker som du vet hva du snakker om.
Men:
- jeg kan være enig i at grønnlien kan være feil i øst-vest retning langs mesteparten av veien. (men veien er mye rettere enn det var før jeg endret).  forøvrig er krysset mellom Grønnlien og Blekenberg/løvstakklien også litt rart..
- jeg er ikke ening at sørenden skal gå oppover rundt Grønnlien sameie, veien går nedover mot Søre skogvei (men treffer den ikke, det er 8 meter høydeforskjell mellom enden og s. skogvei) Dette kan jeg se ved å titte ut vinduet, og er konsistent med finn.nos kart (som jeg mener bruker googles kartmateriale).

Jeg skal ta en tur ut i morgen med GPS og få satt grønnlien sameie på helt riktig plass, så får vi se hva som skjer.

Jeg er ingen verdensmester i dette her, og selvfølgelig er poenget at ting skal være så korrekt som mulig.
afrihagen (2016-04-21 10:46:37+00:00): Jeg har vært ute med gps og funnet følgende: (nøyaktighet 3m)
Grønnlien sameie nordre bygg
- nord-vest hjørne: 60.36856° N, 5.33509° E
- sør-vest hjørne: 60.36796° N, 5.33553° E (NB: trafokjosk som ikke er tegnet inn, ca 3x3m nordende som bygget)
- midt i veien ved sørenden av grønnlien 19. : 60.36879° N, 5.33501° E
YraFyra (2016-04-18 21:14:28+00:00): Hej!
Vad är det för Hostel (Vandrarhem?) som du lagt in på Östra Torn?
YraFyra (2016-04-18 21:16:26+00:00): Välkommen till OSM, jag ser att du nyligen skapat ditt konto!
JanisJf (2016-04-18 20:41:12+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM :)
MCDA (2016-04-19 19:23:17+00:00): Updating seamarks?  How is deleting 40 nodes updating?

This is not a sea, its an inland waterway called Lower Lough Erne.
malcolmh (2016-04-19 20:49:39+00:00): Whoops! Fat finger trouble on my part. - now reverted
SammysHP (2016-04-20 13:55:15+00:00): Die IKK ist doch eher eine Krankenkasse und kein Krankenhaus.
pio2_122 (2018-09-25 17:33:59+00:00): Oznakowane przejścia dla pieszych oznaczamy crossing=uncontrolled. Typ "zebra" występuje tylko w UK.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:crossing?uselang=pl
maciek-szn (2018-09-26 19:51:20+00:00): W pełni się zgadzam :-) A gdzie w tym changesecie jest jakaś zebra?
pio2_122 (2018-09-27 14:42:53+00:00): Oho! Zły changeset! Jestem w szoku :D
Sorki :P
user_5359 (2016-04-19 16:16:05+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. (see point Goodwill)
Self-Perfection (2016-07-16 18:04:43+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Похоже, вы хотели сделать закладку в MAPS.ME, но вместо этого в этой правке переименовали магазин "Перекрёсток" в "Ира ( РАБОТА)" в OpenStreetMap. Теперь магазин виден под новым названием во всех проектах и приложениях, которые берут картографические данные из OpenStreetMap. Т.е. все пользователи MAPS.ME (MAPS.ME тоже берёт данные из OpenStreetMap), которые скачали свежую версию карт, видят в этом месте магазин под названием "Ира ( РАБОТА)". Я [поправил](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40784218), но разольётся моё исправление ещё не скоро, на [картах спутника](http://go.sputnik.ru/m/1JokS83TeB46), например, ваше название будет видно ещё несколько недель.

Для личных заметок в MAPS.ME есть отдельная функция, кнопка со звездой. Править места нужно только если вы хотите, чтобы ваше изменение было видно всем.
aharvey (2019-11-26 23:58:50+00:00): Your original building https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/411511870 was recently deleted in https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77204977/

If you had any local knowledge on which one is correct, please chime in.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-15 14:38:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4131610192/history - have you meant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvariety_store ?
eggie (2017-03-21 08:20:49+00:00): beter laat dan nooit...
Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
captain_slow (2016-04-21 07:37:23+00:00): Hallo Stefan H75
Die von dir gezeichnete Fläche für den Flughafen Zürich ist sehr ungenau (falsch) und enthält auch falsche Daten (Regionalflughafen, Gewerbegebiet). Passe die Fläche doch bitte auf die tatsächliche Fläche des Flughafens an.
Es gibt auch bereits einen Node mit sehr vielen Daten zum Flughafen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26608880
Grüsse
captain_slow
Poly-Appli (2016-04-21 11:53:45+00:00): Hallo captain_slow,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich werde die Fläche später nachbessern. Was die Daten betrifft, ich konnte mit JOSM nur Wert nur "regional" auswählen. Ein anderer Wert stand im dropdown Menü nicht zur verfügung. Ich habe das eben noch mal geprüft, es steht jetzt auch der Wert "international" zur Auswahl. Welcher Wert sollte bei landuse verwendet werden, wenn nicht "commercial". Danke für Deine Hilfe.

Gruß
Stefan
captain_slow (2016-04-21 18:03:09+00:00): Landuse ist nicht nötig. Im Prinzip braucht es genau die Angaben die in oben angegebenen Node stehen. Wobei die Daten dann doppelt vorhanden sind. Denn laut Wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:aeroway=aerodrome?uselang=de) soll es entweder nur einen Node oder nur eine Area zu einem Flughafen geben, aber nicht beides. Ich weiss aber nicht was besser ist oder von der Allgemeinheit bevorzugt wird...
b-unicycling (2025-05-20 16:30:48+00:00): What is your source for the eircodes on the buildings? You may not copy eircodes from the eircodefinder, since it is copyrighted material that does not match the requirements for the open data license used by OpenStreetmap. Unless you found the eircode publicly displayed on each individual house/ gate/ fence or talked to every individual house owner, please delete them.
Vernier Scales (2025-05-22 14:54:18+00:00): Hi, many thanks for your comment.
Could you clarify whether or not you are an agent or employee of OSM? 
I'm familiar with IP infringement (IT) as a victim on several occasions. I'm well versed in IP/data law and restitution.  
Eircodes, such as I have used them, are in the public domain. I would not wish to trespass on any person or entity.
The Eircodes of the properties are publicly displayed on the Eircode website and there is no legal basis that requires the permission of the property owner to use them. 
This legal argument has been long resolved - more than 10 years ago. 
Could you send me a link to any relevant OpenStreetMap or Eircode documents that supports your argument? 
I will, of course, endeavour to adhere to the rules laid down by OSM and data/IP legislation as applies to the use of Eircode.
mackerski (2025-05-23 11:58:30+00:00): You appear to have overlooked the terms of use on the site you used: https://www.eircode.ie/legal

I draw your attention in particular to the text:

"You are permitted to browse this site and to reproduce extracts by way of printing, downloading to a hard disk and by distribution to other people but, in all cases, for non-commercial, informational and personal purposes only. No reproduction of any part of the site may be sold or distributed for commercial gain, nor shall it be modified or incorporated in any other work, publication or site. No other licence or right is granted."

The incorporate into OSM of content from other maps or data sets is only permitted where the data in question is published under a compatible licence. The owner of the Eircode database offers it under a particular commercial licence, and if you've taken the view that it is in the public domain then I have to suggest that your understanding of IP rights is not as solid as you claim.

I will be placing this matter into the hands of the Data Working Group, who will have the task of removing the offending data.
Vernier Scales (2025-05-25 09:36:25+00:00): Hi mackerski and b-unicycling. 
I can see both of you are well invested in OSM and that mackerski is involved with the working groups etc. As I said before, I am willing to endeavour to adhere to rules and legislation. There is no intention on my part to offend anyone or trespass. My use of the Eircodes was for for non-commercial, informational and personal purposes only and I think Eircode/Capita would interpret it that way.
I have removed the Eircodes, as you both requested. 
Your commited involvement with OSM is very much appreciated by me and many others. 

In relation to my understanding of IP rights, your interpretation trumps mine in this setting and I acknowledge that. 
Many thanks to you both.
mackerski (2025-05-25 09:41:42+00:00): Long story short, you don’t get to interpret the licensing intentions of rights holders. If a rights owner sues, which would be their right, it would be very bad for OSM. Furthermore, OSM data is routinely used commercially, as its licence permits. I urge you re-read the OSM documents on how to map, where these issues are all covered.
Vernier Scales (2025-05-25 10:27:14+00:00): I think I will give up on the mapping! 
Thanks again to you both for the service that you do.
rab (2016-04-19 16:23:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411469514
if its a building, it should produce some kind of shadow.
compare it with objects  nearby
here are some more suspicious candidates:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411332893
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411369937
railfan-eric (2017-02-19 22:00:02+00:00): Hi I was wanting to discuss with you about your changing of my edits to the K &O Salina Subdivision.  you changed it back to the old ATSF Salina District.  It's now called the Salina Subivision officially from the K & O RR as in the timetable i have a copy of.  Also it helps to the the RR Initials in front of the sub name so we can see what RR name it is from the map.  i was going back to look at the line on the map because i couldn't remember the name and then saw it was changed on the map and had to dig out the timetable again. thanks.
Skybunny (2017-02-19 23:41:53+00:00): No problem! What was new here is that I put the district into a relation, http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6151649 , with consistent naming inside it. I think because I couldn't find any name (prob. on K&O's website) I went with the newest name I _could_ find, ATSF. By all means please change it back, though I suggest adding as 'source' or 'note' 'I got this from the current K&O timetable, district name is verified'. I'll leave it be in either event to do with as you see fit.
railfan-eric (2017-02-20 00:05:43+00:00): Nice to meet another mapper I assume you're a railfan as well. Is that correct?  I will have to make sure to put in that the names are verified next time i make changes.  I put god knows how many hours maybe hundreds editing almost all the RR's in KS and tons of work in the KC area, Pueblo to Denver and Chicago and parts of IL.  LOL.  and MO and St Louis.  It's a lot of work lol.  that includes smoothing out the track alignments and everything.  btw do you use Open Railway  Maps?  also i created a RR mapping group on Facebook for Open Railway Maps for discussing RR mapping.
santamariense (2016-07-30 16:50:05+00:00): Está em uso o place=city_block para definir quadras.
chetan_labuildings (2016-04-19 11:37:15+00:00): Hey @SReed,

Seems like you've deleted others work in HOTOSM project. Please do not delete other's work. It's always a good practice to keep others work and their history. You can modify them. 

Feel free to comment on this changeset.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-04-19 11:38:40+00:00): Sorry for the above account's reply. This is also my account.
user_5359 (2016-04-19 19:56:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I can't find the street "1900 okeechobee" for the gift shop. Is the address correct?
Supaplex (2016-04-19 14:31:51+00:00): 感謝指正與修改！
user_5359 (2016-04-19 15:57:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't forget to describe the crossing from street and stream. Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert .
CountryCartographer (2016-04-19 16:07:31+00:00): I don't seem to be able to do that with the id editor.
user_5359 (2016-04-19 16:14:08+00:00): Done. I used the JOSM (Java editor for OSM). Dived the stream on two point and add the tag to line part, which cross the street
gryphon (2016-05-10 19:27:51+00:00): Объекты fire_boundary получились несколько громоздкими, и к тому же проходят по уже существующим линиям дорог/рек. Может лучше оформить их в виде мультиполигонов? Это позволило бы избежать лишнего дублирования и другим пользователям было бы проще работать с линиями, по которым проходят ваши границы
Karta01ru (2016-05-10 19:47:07+00:00): Понимаю, знаю, верю, что громоздко и т.д. Но наши пользователи зачастую далеки от того, чтобы справиться с мультиполигонами (могут также поломать уже существующие). Здесь же получается линия, ни к чему не привязанная (в идеале, если следовать инструкциям на сайте). Так что извините за доставляемые неудобства...
smaprs (2016-04-19 11:11:33+00:00): Hi. What does this area mean?:  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411571024
schadow1 (2016-04-19 08:22:40+00:00): Hi audzbonus.
Please do not place tags on node edges of the building (polygon).
Also the area is already at San Pedro, Laguna (check the admin boundary). Use addr:province Laguna and addr:city San Pedro.
Thanks for mapping!
audzbonus (2016-04-19 08:40:23+00:00): Hi,

noted. I will edit it again. thanks!
schadow1 (2016-04-19 09:09:06+00:00): fixed them already. you can go on with other edits. thanks so much!
user_5359 (2016-04-19 20:03:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node to one of the buildings. If you need help: You are welcome!
mueschel (2016-04-20 13:05:26+00:00): Hi Jam Noah,
there is a little mistake on 113 of your buildings: You wrote "arddr:city" instead of "addr:city". Would you mind correcting this? Please let me know if you need assistance.

Cheers, Jan
mavl (2019-01-08 16:58:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-08 16:59:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
FvGordon (2016-04-21 06:31:30+00:00): The single relation in this changeset (a warehouse) is missing the outer (and inner) roles. It has no members.
mavl (2019-01-09 16:29:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-09 16:28:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-04-19 08:27:55+00:00): Странная нумерация у дома действительно адресс улица Айтек Сарсенова 25?
Samaticus (2016-04-19 09:33:34+00:00): Да действительно ул. А.Сарсенова 25. 
рядом якобы указанные нумерации домов осталась от прошлой нумерации участков. пока улице не дали название.
Alecs01 (2016-04-23 08:54:52+00:00): I don't know how it works whith maps.me, but please do not add chinese names to the "name" tag, it makes no sense (in Italy at least), i moved them to name:zh=*
krisni (2016-04-23 09:01:11+00:00): thx
malenki (2016-04-19 16:19:23+00:00): Weshalb hat diese Straße
ref=Lützelhardtstraße?:
¹https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64080430/history
HOKKuem (2016-04-20 07:38:19+00:00): weil das erste Teil zu Lahr Reichenbach gehört.
malenki (2016-04-20 16:44:34+00:00): Also hat die Straße keinen Namen, nur ein ref?
freebeer (2019-01-06 09:19:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66065088 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me mistagged personal residence
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-04-19 08:33:43+00:00): Странно почему максимальная скорость 40 км/ч стоит знак, или фактически из за пробок, качества дорожного покрытия нельзя ехать с большей скоростью?
SammysHP (2016-04-20 13:58:08+00:00): Kann man wirklich nur an diesen beiden Stellen von einer zur anderen Seite kommen? Ich habe das eher als zugewachsene Fläche in Erinnerung.