piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fabzgy (2020-10-17 09:25:47+00:00): Hallo Skyper,
der Radweg ist auf beiden Seiten der Berliner Allee durch einen Bordstein von der Fahrbahn getrennt.
Radfahrer:innen vom Radfahrstreifen aus der Breisacher Straße fahren auf die Rechtsabbiegespur in Richtung Messe auf die Berliner Allee und sind dann dort auf dem kombinierten Fuß- und Radweg.

Ich hoffe das ist verständlich.

LG
Fabian
skyper (2020-10-17 11:38:34+00:00): Hi

Danke. Da wurde leider vor ein paar Monaten einiges nicht korrekt eingetragen. Werde ich jetzt aufräumen.

Ist auf der Rechtsabbiegespur ein Radfahrstreifen oder fehlt hier eine durchgängige Rad-Infrastruktur?

Laut den Daten ist auf der Berliner Allee der Bereich an der Haltestelle "Elsässer Straße" auf der Ostseite nur ein Radstreifen. Richtig?

Ciao skyper
Fabzgy (2020-10-17 14:31:34+00:00): Auf dem Rechtsabbieger ist kein Radweg ausgewiesen.

Auf Höhe der Haltestelle wird der kombinierte Fuß- und Radweg (durch weiße Mittellinie getrennt) zu einem Radfahrstreifen auf der Fahrbahn.

ciao
Fabian

PS: Gibt es die Möglichkeit auf OSM die Breite von Radfahrstreifen bzw. Radwegen zu erfassen?
skyper (2020-10-18 15:23:22+00:00): Super, da ist so einiges falsch eingetragen, hoffe ich habe morgen Zeit da mal aufzuräumen.

Bei Fahrradstreifen verwende ich das Spur-Tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lanes
Ein Beispiel mit geschätzter Breite:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30302129

Bei Radwegen ist das grundsätzlich auch möglich, es gibt aber auch andere Ansätze. Im Forum gibt es da gerade eine Diskussion: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70701

LG skyper
skyper (2020-10-19 17:27:15+00:00): So, hab aufgeräumt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92722261
Nakaner (2020-12-19 11:09:51+00:00): Hallo,

ein von dir eingetragener Zugang zur Tiefgarage am ZKM wird in einer Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2433637 kritisiert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
BCNorwich (2020-10-05 06:54:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to let you know that in the absence of tag oneway=no OSM usually takes it that there is not a oneway restriction. Thus it's not necessary to tag a highway with oneway=no except in special circumstances, which this is not.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2020-10-05 06:59:22+00:00): Hi, Like the oneway=no, covered=no is implied by it's absence. Thus these two negative tags are not needed here.
Regards Bernard.
Cartographer10 (2020-10-08 16:55:49+00:00): Ik heb de fietstags en de note tag weggehaald van het Harmen Meurspad in Kortenoord. Ik heb geen borden gezien dat fietsers zijn toegestaan (ook geen voetpad bord overigens maar fietsers lijken mij tussen de spelende kinderen niet gewenst). https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92186914#map=15/51.9702/5.6702
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-08 19:14:56+00:00): Helemaal top. Dankje dat je even bent gaan kijken. Die plek is namelijk nogal uit mijn route. Trouwens ook een duimpje voor hoeveel je met streetcomplete hebt gedaan. Ziet er erg compleet uit
jaap de vries (2020-10-09 08:02:32+00:00): Tip, let op je bewerkingsgebied. Nu is er een heel groot gebied in heel Wageningen met 136 aangepasten objecten ways. Als je het kleiner houdt is het voor iedereen overzichtelijk. Zeker als je gaat werken met osmose.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-09 09:40:11+00:00): Bij deze changeset ging het me eigenlijk ook om heel Wageningen. De problemen die Osmose aangaf waren redelijk gelijkmatig over de stad verdeeld en ik zag er niets in om voor elke wijk een aparte changeset met 12 aanpassingen te maken.
Lester Bempong clark (2020-10-04 23:12:00+00:00): that is my church
felipeeugenio (2020-11-22 16:44:18+00:00): Hola Felipe.
No sé qué hiciste, pero dejaste varias calles duplicadas. Ojo con eso.
saludos
SekeRob (2020-10-05 05:54:52+00:00): Good morning,

I left a note on the map at Casoli some weeks ago about the broken relation of the SS5 (all road signs and km marks are still ref. to SS5 not SR5 here in Prov. PE), The note pertains to the broken relation of said SS5 between Casoli and Tagliacozzo as can be seen here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/31311. The red route on the map between those two places it missing, not showing, suspecting the name is inconsistent rather than the references.

Have a good day.
sorcrosc (2020-10-10 15:43:46+00:00): Replied here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2361058
I'm closing the note.
AlexNcUa (2020-10-18 13:27:21+00:00): Hello, why you have decided that the camera is no more exist?

It is clearly recognized on mapillary from 03 October (it is latest available image sequence).

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.412387599999995&lng=29.6077119&z=17&dateFrom=2020-08-01&pKey=huuZe2YPG9V6RzD1VQJMJw&focus=photo

Also I have noted that you additionally removed two speed cameras from M-06, do you have proofs that both of them are not existing?
AlexNcUa (2020-10-18 13:31:55+00:00): * Additionally you have removed this one
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=W6jVRTwzqQADEbGInHOEFQ

and this one 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=k7zAyWVVKQO2iPOE9kH5dQ

Both of them can be found on mapillary sequence from 6 September
tkoval83 (2020-10-18 14:05:19+00:00): Well, looks like they added them in 2020, because on images from 2019 there not cameras. Most photos are from 2019, so I thought that was mistake. Put them back.
AlexNcUa (2020-10-19 09:39:57+00:00): Thanks. Yes, you are correct, in Kyiv Region all cameras were installed in May-June 2020
DressyPear4 (2020-10-06 12:00:45+00:00): Olá, estrada vicinal não pode ser primária, essas são de nível estadual ou federal.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91948831
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-04 23:53:24+00:00): …idges; reclassified alleys
jonorossi (2020-10-06 04:27:51+00:00): Hi Mick, welcome to OSM.

Areas tagged with building=* should only cover the building itself, not the land around it, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building for more info. That then lets us add building=shed, leisure=swimming_pool, etc.

We then use a different area usually over all contiguous land for the same purpose with a landuse=* tag. e.g. landuse=residential over the private land but not usually the roads.

Often landuse areas get mapped before individual buildings because you can add a landuse=retail as a simple rectangle in a minute, but feel free to add whichever level of detail you like first, especially areas you know well.

The OSM Wiki is a great resource to understand established tagging.

Jono
nevw (2020-10-06 09:10:37+00:00): There is a plot tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot but see the warning discouraging such tags.
If you wish to define the boundaries of each block of land a good way to do it is the map the fences from satellite images using barrier=fence as this is verifiable and not dependent on third party land boundary sets.
BCNorwich (2020-10-07 08:03:48+00:00): Hi, Please be careful not to duplicate paths, I've just remove three duplicate sections. Two were paths drawn atop of bridges (a bridge is a highway same as the path), and path atop path at the church.
I also moved/unjoined the path from the lake outline, (the path line is the highway centerline drawn atop the lake outline means the path is half in the water).

Regards Bernard.
Brownie115 (2020-10-09 00:15:41+00:00): Thanks Bernard - I've just started out with helping to map, and which some items are clear, others are a learning curve, so thanks very much for your help and input!
Andrew
BCNorwich (2020-10-09 06:46:36+00:00): Hi Andrew, Glad to assist, if you need help please just ask. There are several forums for mappers, you can message another mapper by clicking their name then send message.

Regards Bernard.
weblogdryads (2026-07-05 23:32:08+00:00): many of these buildings are inaccurately traced
Paul_012 (2020-10-31 12:45:51+00:00): I've partially reverted this changeset, as it introduced bad alignment.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-30 15:14:24+00:00): Did you mean to tag that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186758554/history is named after murder victim?
Danil (2020-10-13 05:47:19+00:00): 1. warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway muncul karena ada dua garis (waterway dan highway) bersinggungan pada layer yang sama, solusinya:
a. Jika jembatan, highway diberi `layer=1`
b. Jika gorong2, waterway-nya yang diberi  `layer=-1`.

2. warnings:crossing_ways:waterway-waterway itu muncul karena tidak ada node di titik temu persimpangan waterway.

3. Meski disebut kanal oleh warga lokal, dalam definisi OSM saluran yang bersifat drainase lebih cocok diberi tag `waterway=drain` (jika dirawat rutin dan biasanya pakai semen) atau `waterway=ditch` (jika hanya galian di tanah).
TravGW (2020-10-06 20:49:27+00:00): The King William neighborhood already exists to the north. Southtown is a larger area containing several neighborhoods including King William. I have fixed it for you.
mapdogz (2020-10-06 23:15:11+00:00): I live in lower King William - 4th generation of my family to do so. King William is split in half by South Alamo. Both portions are the King William Historic District. The giant word "Southtown" was over my neighborhood. Technically, when the name Southtown was made up, it was for the business district of South Alamo which runs though King William. Southtown now refers to a large unofficial swath of south of downtown but putting it over my neighborhood, which is fully King William, is incorrect.
mapdogz (2020-10-06 23:17:35+00:00): I live in lower King William - 4th generation of my family to do so. King William is split in half by South Alamo. Both portions are the King William Historic District. The giant word "Southtown" was over my neighborhood. Technically, when the name Southtown was made up, it was for the business district of South Alamo which runs though King William. Southtown now refers to a large unofficial swath of south of downtown but putting it over my neighborhood, which is fully King William, is incorrect. I only made an account to fix this part of the map so please look at other maps, the City of San Antonio's Map of Historic Districts on their website, etc, and please put the name of my neighborhood back. Thank you.
Striker2000 (2020-10-07 17:25:50+00:00): Дороги отрисованы по устаревшим невыровненным спутниковым снимкам. Правка на грани вандализма :(
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-05 07:26:59+00:00): Has all of this construction been completed and open to traffic?
thek22900 (2020-10-05 07:44:06+00:00): Yes, I went to this area only a few days ago and there you turn here to continue on the A9, i have edited for all the work that's finished and i left all that is unfinished still here
thek22900 (2020-10-05 07:47:19+00:00): https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/about/news-events/news/ministerial/2020/200424-drivers-get-moving-on-new-section-of-the-northern-road.html

apparently it's been finished since April
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-05 08:39:16+00:00): They must've installed all the traffic signals after mid-august since there wasn't any sign of traffic signals when I last visited. Also we shouldn't be using government sources (mainly due to licensing issues) and since the A9 seems like its always changing in which case on the ground surveys are best.

I'm going to make a few edits to this intersection mainly due to both a few council boundaries being broken (since some road segments contain those boundary relation memberships), and to bring back some of the old ways that were deleted since preserving the history is good OSM practice (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history) e.g. change a road under construction to completed instead of deleting the old way and realigning the existing way
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-05 08:41:31+00:00): Also is the new geometry you created an estimation or is it based on gpx or something else? Since there isn't a source in your changeset
thek22900 (2020-10-05 08:43:23+00:00): yes it is a rough estimation
PT-53 (2020-10-05 08:12:34+00:00): Hallo goltapan,
dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855251032/history
ist mit Sicherheit keine Service-Straße, allenfals ein Waldweg (Track), vermutich aber nur eine Rückegasse.
Ohne Ortskenntnisse sollten solche "Wege" nicht eingezeichnet werden! 
Grüße
goltapan (2020-10-06 07:45:58+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have misinterpreted the road classification and added a service road. thanks for the heads up. please find the changeset(92028732) for the reversion. going forward, i will make sure to add the roads more cautiously in concurrence with the ground reality. once again, thanks for the valuable suggestions. always happy to learn from the community.
Mike Raust (2020-10-10 08:33:49+00:00): Hi pizzaiolo,

if you think that the whole world should be "iD autovalidated", please apply for an automated edit (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct). Your current procedure is very inefficient and I severely doubt that you would notice a closed or changed shop during your process.

Kind regards,
Mike
pizzaiolo (2020-10-11 00:06:31+00:00): Hi Mike. Was there a specific problem with the changeset?
PT-53 (2020-10-05 08:03:32+00:00): Hallo pravalg,
bitte Luftbilder vor dem Abzeichnen korrekt ausrichten!.
Grüße
pravalg (2020-10-06 06:34:11+00:00): thanks for the response. apologies, i have misaligned the residential road. thanks for the quick correction. i will make sure to stick to the alignment of surrounding roads for my future edits. always happy to learn from the community.
eggie (2020-10-05 07:53:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Realiseer je wanneer je iets aanpast in OSM en uploadt komt dit ook daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart.
Wat was je bedoeling hier. 
Is de Kerkstraat in Baarn daadwerkelijk een zandpad?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-05 07:58:58+00:00): reverted by changeset  #91967599
Tim,
Je bijdrage is teruggedraaid. Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG,
eggie
Vascom (2020-11-24 19:36:38+00:00): Простите, а что значит access=no на тропе? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724789292
Erelen (2020-11-25 07:01:53+00:00): Совершенно ничего осмысленного :)
До меня у этой тропы было:

access=no
foot=yes
highway=path

Я, в одном из порывов борьбы за разумные access`ы, снимал foot=yes с ряда highway=path. А тут был недостаточно внимателен, что там ещё и access=no затесался.

Спасибо, сейчас исправлю.
Vascom (2020-11-25 07:06:12+00:00): Спасибо.
Bert Araali (2021-03-06 19:05:13+00:00): Could you please use the correct tag for roads. It should be highway=*, not road=*. Are you part of a team making these edits in Sri Lanka ?
Regards, Bert Araali
skfd (2020-10-07 06:43:40+00:00): привет! ето пристройка с двумя квартирами или просто балкон? вообще такое надо делать не отдельным зданием а сложнее, к сожалению.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91963335
Palolo (2023-01-16 00:36:35+00:00): Please note that only the area polygon needs the building=yes tag. Please do not tag each node.
streckenkundler (2021-04-05 15:18:39+00:00): Hei,

du hast hier die Brücke gelöscht. Ich weiß, daß hier im Zuge des Ausbaus alles neu gemacht wird. Kommt hier wieder eine neue Brücke hin? Denn im Moment ist die Knotenpunktroute 85-90 unterbrochen. https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/8894051/map

Wenn dort eine neue Brücke hinkommt, ist es besser mit highway=construction zu arbeiten. Der Landkreis weist die Route als Bestand aus.

Danke,

streckenkundler
std_82 (2021-04-06 05:12:12+00:00): Die Brücken werden wieder aufgebaut. Da einige Router Wege, die als "construction" gekennzeichnet sind, trotzdem für Fußgänger und Radfahrer freigeben, habe ich die Brücke komplett entfernt. Hätte man vielleicht auch sperren können. Aber aufgrund der Dauer der Brückenarbeiten hatte ich mich fürs Entfernen entschlossen. Alle Brücken erhalten einen Ersatzneubau.
streckenkundler (2021-04-06 06:16:04+00:00): Hei,

alles Klar, Danke... construction ist für sowas immer besser! Ich setze dann auch immer ein access=no in Verbindung mit note mit einer Erklärung... Spätestens das access=no verhindert dann das Routing...

Sven
streckenkundler (2021-04-06 20:04:19+00:00): Ich hab Brücke wiederhergestellt, Straßen angepasst, alles auf construction und access=no gesetzt. Damit lässt es sich besser nachverfolgen.

Sven
bigbug21 (2020-10-07 16:37:32+00:00): A quick note on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252729134: Hp 2 signalling and a missing Zs 3 does not necessarily imply maxspeed=40. There might be (non-transparent) instructions in train driver's timetables might allow 50 to 60 km/h. I will therefore remove maxspeed=40 on these lines.
JJJWegdam (2020-10-14 17:44:10+00:00): Oh really? In that case it was a mistaken assumption. Thanks for pointing it out.
Brickelt963 (2024-04-09 15:08:28+00:00): Bonjour dans votre groupe de modification, vous avez la Relation 11719882 incluant plusieurs bâtiments résidentiels, est-ce que la relation est motivé par une informations quelconque ou est-il possible de les distinguer, car plusieurs résidence ne porte pas le même nom. Bien à vous. Brickelt963.
Super-Map (2024-04-10 14:38:27+00:00): Bonjour, vous pouvez faire les corrections si vous avez plus d'informations à apporter. Bonne continuation, bonne fin de journée.
hocu (2020-10-05 10:22:14+00:00): Merhaba, güncelleme için tesekkürler ancak Palandöken Caddesi üzerindeki binanin adresini degistirmissiniz. Su anda Palandöken Caddesi No 3 adresindeki bina Serencebey Caddesi No 42 olarak görünüyor. Lütfen bu binanin adresini eski haline getirip, Serencebey Caddesi üzerinde tasindiginiz binayi bularak adresi oraya ekleyin. Bütün bina size aitse (ve bina sekli mevcut degilse) binanin seklini çizerek adresinizi binaya ekleyin. Ancak binanin sadece bir bölümü (daire ya da dükkan) size aitse o konuma bir nokta (node) koyarak adresinizi bu noktaya ekleyin. Tesekkurler, yeni yerinizde iyi isler dilerim.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91965175
skfd (2020-10-07 06:50:41+00:00): привет! name не нужно писать для домов. building=house ето коттедж\хата. А тут building=apartments -- многоквартирный дом 😊
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91965498
skfd (2020-10-07 06:52:08+00:00): В редакторе можно нажать Q что бы сделать домик прямоугольным )
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91966174
skfd (2020-10-07 06:52:09+00:00): В редакторе можно нажать Q что бы сделать домик прямоугольным )
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91966174
skyper (2022-02-23 17:31:28+00:00): Hallo kaeru
Welche Quellen hast Du denn für das RadNETZ verwendet?
Bitte gebe doch immer die verwendeten Quellen im CS an, das macht es wesentlich einfacher und verständlicher für uns alle.
Siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74797

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
naveenpf (2020-12-30 03:55:17+00:00): Hello Vijiblitzz,
this is wrong tagging.
Can you please remove it?

Thanks,
naveenpf
Stalker61 (2020-10-05 18:24:47+00:00): Добрый вечер.
Будьте так добры заниматься удалением данных на своём локальном ресурсе. Пока вы здесь в гостях и извольте соблюдать требования проекта
naveenpf (2020-10-09 07:37:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91967518
eggie (2020-10-05 08:59:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-05 09:04:55+00:00): De begraafplaats zelf staat overigens al vernoemd op het vlak.. 
MVG,
Eggie
mueschel (2020-10-08 15:41:43+00:00): Hi,
please check the tags on these nodes. Many of them are misspelled and not used in any other place.

If this is some kind of group activity, please point your supervisor to the OSM guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Thanks!
ququruzka (2020-10-05 10:07:21+00:00): пиши державною
ID`s (2020-10-05 10:27:05+00:00): Special for U - Виправлення.
ПС: Насколько я помню - суржик с вкраплением английского тебя бесит ещё 
больше)
ndm (2020-10-06 21:47:29+00:00): Redrawn - ways going through parking spaces
kumrnls (2020-10-08 04:08:10+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have missed aligning the existing  service road. Thanks for the quick correction. Going forward, I will be very cautious in aligning the roads with the latest geometry. Once again, thanks for the correction. Always happy to learn from the community.
eggie (2020-10-05 09:58:54+00:00): Dag whizzo, 
Info Woortman even samengevoegd met de BAGadresnode nr 3. Website toegevoegd.
MVG,
eggie
alessandrocarmeli (2021-01-31 02:25:11+00:00): ciao non trovo adeguato il ref. Sarebbe meglio GVT?
Il sito ANAS dice AUTOSTRADA A SISTIANA-RABUIESE.
eggie (2020-10-05 09:50:10+00:00): 	Dag Whizzo,
Live Today
shop	=furniture Heb je gisteren zelf al op de kaart gezet op het pand ernaast. 

Er zijn toch geen twee identieke zaken naast elkaar? Op nr 4 en 6?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-05 09:54:27+00:00): Live today verwijderd van nr 4
whizzo (2020-10-05 14:19:58+00:00): Nee, niet twee identieke zaken, maar Live Today zit zowel in het pand nr. 4 als in het pand nr. 6. Voorheen waren dat twee aparte winkels. De ingang van de winkel is op nr 6.
eggie (2020-10-05 14:43:00+00:00): Oke.. ,maar dan is het nu goed getagd met één winkel op nr 6.
De oude rendering is altijd hardnekkig bij winkels en kan vele dagen duren.
CTRL F5 een paar keer wil wel eens helpen. Dan maak je je cache leeg. 
Bedankt voor je reactie.
MVG,
eggie
VA00 (2021-03-06 15:54:41+00:00): 2 zielone szlaki po tej samej trasie? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1483998

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1273154
JIFFNET (2021-03-06 15:57:44+00:00): Tak. Jeden to szlak turystyczny drugi to lokalna ścieżka edukacyjna.
JIFFNET (2021-03-06 16:00:37+00:00): Tak to wygląda w terenie:
https://mapa-turystyczna.pl/photo/49524/way/13597#49.76217/19.43413/12
ququruzka (2020-10-05 09:58:00+00:00): odna z odnoyu
Japetusgr (2020-10-10 15:24:24+00:00): E6 route was not correct, it follows the main road which is also signposted with the E6 marks.
aidworker (2020-10-11 09:08:22+00:00): Hello. Not according to https://www.era-ewv-ferp.org/ which is responsible for all e paths. I have tried to contact eooa.gr in regards to E6 part Greece, but they never replied to my requests. It was impossible to map "section 67 maronia-petrota port" due to inaccuracies of background maps. I have mapped the whole are south-south east of Maronia (i.e. dirt roads and tracks), and based on the latest background sat images and gpx file from ERA,  I have mapped the E6 part you are referring to. Yet, if there's official E6 signposts on the main tarmac road from Maronia to Petrota port, please define it on the road segment relations as "European long distance path E6 - part Greece". 
I have mapped the whole E6 part Greece end to end. If you notice any other issues on areas you are familiar with, please let me know. 
Are you Greek btw? Many thanks!
hocu (2020-10-05 10:28:34+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution. Please add `leisure=pitch` to this area as well. `sport=basketball` alone is not enough.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91977049
mustarde (2020-10-05 10:32:05+00:00): Hey, thanks! I added it.
hocu (2020-10-05 11:41:44+00:00): Perfect, thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91977049
PLima785 (2020-10-07 16:27:00+00:00): Hello thanks for the edit,
I´m was clearing my rookie mistakes and align the sat imagery but on a big area, problably got flags on the Osmchan
Paul Berry (2020-11-20 22:38:57+00:00): This is not a service road. Reverting.