piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gormo (2017-03-21 13:14:40+00:00): Hallo, ich habe eine Anmerkung zu dieser Änderung: Du hast die Gemeindegrenze entlang der "Lecker Au" gelegt. Dabei hast du leider die Grenzrelation (Grenzen werden in OSM über sogenannte Grenzrelationen abgebildet) kaputt gemacht. Der webbasierte Editor "iD" hat leider eine schlechte Unterstützung für diese Grenzrelationen. Ich setze mal die Grenzen wieder so, wie ich das aus deiner Änderung interpretiere und korrigiere die Relationen, würde dich aber bitten, weitere 'Änderungen an Grenzrelationen mit dem mächtigen Editor JOSM zu machen. Und wenn du weitere Fragen hast, kannst Du dich im Forum melden: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56862&p=2 , Login mit dem normalen OSM-Account.

Viele Grüße und weiter frohes Kartieren, gormo
freebeer (2018-11-03 09:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64135574 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me castle with personal info
literan (2017-07-27 19:41:27+00:00): Правка откачена в части необоснованного удаления полигонов landuse
iandees (2017-03-20 16:48:10+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding these parks. I made a small change to the three you added recently. When creating the park outline, please apply the "Park" preset to the outline, not to a point on the interior of the polygon.
Commodoortje (2017-03-22 10:40:26+00:00): Ik had je verzocht even niet te mappen, hier heb je geen gevolg aan gegeven. 
Er wordt serieus overwogen om een block te plaatsen op je edits. 
[Ticket#2017020710000041]
Overweeg je toekomstige edits goed.
Commodoortje (2017-03-22 10:43:45+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=637685#p637685
dgitto (2017-03-20 17:13:55+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto in OSM. Sei della zona di Milazzo?
drnoble (2017-03-20 18:35:12+00:00): As per discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/552859
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-20 18:30:07+00:00): CRAP.ME nonsense reverted.
iandees (2017-03-20 17:33:41+00:00): Hi there! This house doesn't seem to be a lake, so I'm reverting your change. Please keep in mind that these changes are applied to the real map – if you'd like to play around or make test changes, let me know and I can point you in the right direction.
pneff (2017-03-21 21:43:24+00:00): Where does the post code of Chicken Shop / Dirty Burger in Wimbledon come from? Both their web site as well as the Royal Mail have the SW19 1RH at that address.
Fradeve11 (2017-03-22 11:49:14+00:00): Good question, thanks for asking. I've taken the data straight from the bill received after having dinner in the place. I wonder if they put the wrong postcode in the bill. If you know for sure the old postcode was the right one, feel free to change it back :)
pneff (2017-03-22 11:56:06+00:00): Thanks, I'll change it back then. It appears that 1QE (the post code on the bill) is the other side of the road.
tyr_asd (2017-06-27 21:42:36+00:00): Wurde die Straße kürzlich umbenannt? Die Hausnummern an der Straße haben noch "Prantlweg" aös Straßennamen, siehe z.B. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2749659191
chillly (2017-03-20 19:04:54+00:00): I think you have worried about the name not appearing and changed something that was already right. Is the whole area really a building, with a building in it? I'll try to put this right. Please be patient about the name appearing, it will.
ashleyannmathew (2017-07-05 11:36:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/31.582726135959607/44.65241682966385
The ways are duplicated and not tagged properly. Can you check that and update the information?
Hjart (2017-03-20 18:13:55+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag. 
Innovatorium passede dog med luftfotos (det er faktisk ikke satellitfotos). Bemærk at de her fotos på dette sted ikke er taget helt lige ned og derfor er lidt "skrå" og at bygningen nu ikke længere passer med hvor den reelt er på "jordniveau".
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
schleuss (2017-05-09 01:52:00+00:00): Hello,
You deleted a bunch of nodes in this change (drinking fountains, viewpoints, bus stops). Why?
Jon
Virgil Bucur (2017-03-20 18:11:50+00:00): Eu nu l-am desenat așa.
naoliv (2017-08-16 19:21:56+00:00): Dudiii, em vários trechos você acabou duplicando a rodovia (deixando dois pedaços um em cima do outro)
Acho que a sua intenção foi deixar as vias com mão dupla e acabou, de alguma forma, duplicando os trechos.
lefuturiste (2023-07-27 15:57:45+00:00): c'est pas le bon tag ! Je t'invite à t'informer sur le wiki, ici c'est un calvaire donc : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=wayside_cross
rab (2017-03-20 18:29:39+00:00): Tagging is wrong.
The roads are stubs without any use.
No one will fix this, because it is a building only task.
iandees (2017-03-20 18:43:50+00:00): Hi! Thanks for adding this great detail to the golf course. I made a small change: the line drawing the course of the golf hole should have the hole number in the "ref"/"reference" text box, not the "name". Keep up the great work, and let me know if you have any questions!
pitscheplatsch (2017-03-24 12:43:17+00:00): Hi realtin. Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47019971
TZorn (2017-03-29 13:19:06+00:00): Ich habe die place-Änderungen mit Changeset 47259370 revertiert. Siehe dazu auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=638859#p638859.
iandees (2017-03-20 18:40:37+00:00): Hi there! Thanks for adding your business to OpenStreetMap.

I made a small change: the building outline should only go around the building, not the whole property. I also noticed that you duplicated the information on the point as well as the building polygon, so I merged those two things together.

Let me know if you have any questions!
srbrook (2017-03-22 14:36:33+00:00): This change moves an administrative boundary (parish) imported from OS_OpenData_Boundary-Line in 2011
Has the boundary changed or is this a mistake?
pyram (2017-03-21 20:09:19+00:00): Nochmals Hallo,
nein, hier war das Nummern entfernen schon richtig (Der Weg heißt ja nicht so). Aber das oneway=yes, das Du vorhin gesetzt hast heißt, dass hier niemand mehr herauskommt ;-)
Nebenbei: Ist das denn überhaupt (und bis zur hinteren Garage) ein öffentlicher Weg (Wohnstraße)? Oder nicht eher ein Anliegerweg?
jonny65 (2017-03-22 20:28:16+00:00): Hallo wieder, ich würde es "Stichstraße" einer Wohnstraße nennen, Anlieger wäre ja auch beschildert. Sinn macht es aber dennoch nicht es als "öffentlich" in dem Sinn anzusehen, denn man befährt das Stück (kleine Auffahrt) und steht vor 2 Garagen bzw. neben den Anwohner Carports und Parkplätzen, toll ;-) Die Auffahrt ist übrigens 1 Autobreite breit, also parken könnte da auch niemand.
pyram (2017-03-24 15:40:22+00:00): Wie so oft gibt es bei OSM keine einheitliche Linie, wie man es am Besten erfasst.
Ich persönlich würde hier highway=service und service=alley 
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley) nutzen und ein lanes=1 ergänzen. Wenn nicht explizit ein Straßennamenschild dort steht würde ich auch keinen Namen in die Datenbank eintragen.
Andere sehen das anders.
Beispiel: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4975153
Hjart (2017-03-20 20:21:19+00:00): Af flere grunde er det ofte bedre at bevare perroner som en simpel linie.
iandees (2017-03-20 19:25:48+00:00): Hi mrmart! Please don't make test edits to the map. This map data is used by services around the world and we only accept real features that can be verified on the ground. If you'd like to practice editing OSM, please let me know and I can point you to a test server.
iandees (2017-03-20 19:24:36+00:00): Hi there! I removed your point because it didn't contain any useful information. If you're trying to add your business to OpenStreetMap please make sure to select a preset in the editor. If you'd like a simpler interface, check out https://www.onosm.org/.
BCNorwich (2017-03-21 07:16:34+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You've placed this POI on the roadside by a little park, likely inadvertently incorrect. Features uploaded to OSM must be verifiable on the ground.  It would be good if you could look at this positioning again. Or could you give more details of the florist, name, address so maybe someone else can figure out it's proper position.
Regards
BCNorwich (2017-04-04 06:06:48+00:00): No response so POI is removed.
mapping man (2017-04-04 09:35:32+00:00): Hi BCNorwich. Just to let you know that there is a small public garden in that POI location. It is paved with an ornamental shrubbery in the centre and benches in a circular pattern on the outside.  I think Jonathon must have used the wrong POI.
gileri (2017-03-22 17:38:53+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM !

Les horaires, entrées dans le tag opening_hours, doivent suivre un format particulier afin que le monde entier puisse les comprendre, ainsi que les applications telles que les GPS.

Plus d'information ici :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours

Un outil permet de "dessiner" facilement les opening_hours :

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
SuperPowl (2017-03-26 19:42:41+00:00): Ok merci, c’est noté pour la prochaine fois ;)
Nakaner (2017-03-20 21:27:45+00:00): Hallo Ruhrpottkast,

warum hast du in diesem Änderungssatz Gleise an Weichen aufgeteilt, obwohl sie vor und nach der Weiche dieselben Tags haben?

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47021459

Durch das Aufteilen der Ways haben alle Relationen, die diese Ways referenzieren, eine neue Version bekommen. Durch das unnötige Aufteilen geht bei der Hälfte des Ways die Versiongeschichte (wer vor dir den Way angelegt hat) verloren.

Viele Grüße

Michael
mueschel (2017-03-21 11:05:37+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM. in your edits you used tags like '2nd floor occupant', 'other occupants' and several similar ones. These are not defined in the wiki and therefore are rather useless because none of our software can understand it. Please have a look to the wiki how POI like offices and shops have to be tagged to be usable.

Cheers, Jan
user_5359 (2017-03-21 17:05:12+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Hausnummer und Straße tragen wir in unterschiedlichen Schlüsseln ein. Grundstückgrenzen würden auch nicht mit den Namen „Grundstückgrenze“ gekennzeichnet, aber diese werden in der Regel nicht eingezeichnet, weil diese „auf dem Boden“ nicht zu sehen sind.
praeteritum (2024-01-05 12:04:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145919186.
homer__simpsons (2017-03-20 19:37:36+00:00): **That was note #878707
Spanholz (2017-03-20 20:47:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

you can also change the classification of the road to highway=unclassified which is way better than the residential road which is everywhere. 

Thanks and have fun mapping.
eggie (2017-03-20 21:04:15+00:00): Je edit heb ik teruggedraaid. Het is niet helemaal goed gegaan zo te zien. Er liepen verschillende waterways door elkaar heen en je had een cirkel gemaakt van landuse=grass. dat zal ook de oorzaak zijn. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47021800&zoom=17&lat=51.85857&lon=5.86173&layers=B0TTTFT
wat was precies je bedoeling?
(Re)Startende mappers volgen we in het begin om evt. te kunnen helpen.
Spanholz (2017-03-20 20:49:23+00:00): Impressive edits,

thanks for joining and contributing to OSM!
Constable (2017-03-21 11:15:38+00:00): sir, how do you plan to fix this http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/935211 ?
TZorn (2017-03-21 09:26:52+00:00): Hallo Bürste,

magst du mir mal erklären, warum neighbourhood besser sein soll als hamlet oder isolated_dwelling? Wurde das irgendwo diskutiert?

Neighbourhood bezeichnet laut Wiki und auch nach meinem Verständnis eine Gegend innerhalb einer Siedlung. Im Wiki steht sogar: "Don't use neighbourhood for uninhabited places or isolated settlements (depending on the size, see place=locality, place=isolated_dwelling or place=hamlet)."
Durch diese Änderungen gehen meiner Meinung nach wertvolle Zusatzinformationen verloren.

Ich finde du solltest diese Änderungen vorerst einstellen und im Forum oder der Mailingliste andiskutieren. Oder hat diese Diskussion schon stattgefunden (wenn ja, wo?)?
Chrysopras (2017-03-22 07:13:38+00:00): Ich kann mich TZorn nur anschließen und schlage eine unverzügliche Revertierung dieses Changesets vor, da viele Änderungen darin offensichtlich nur als Versehen oder Missverständnis zu erklären sind (siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=637632#p637632).
TZorn (2017-03-29 13:17:51+00:00): Ich habe die place-Änderungen mit Changeset 47252249 revertiert. Siehe dazu auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=638859#p638859.
praeteritum (2024-01-05 12:00:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145919158.
kartler175 (2017-04-25 09:46:10+00:00): Wenn die Fahrbahnen geteilt werden, bitte aber auch richtig und vollsständig: Anpassung der Einbahnregelung und Aufteilung der lanes!
BHSPitMonkey (2017-04-25 03:31:41+00:00): Could you please revert this change? I spent a lot of time documenting this important, difficult-to-navigate trail and I don't agree that it was incorrect (or that it needed removing).
ToeBee (2017-04-25 04:29:17+00:00): Agreed. I do not see why this should be removed, especially given that this seems to be a blind edit (without even looking at satellite imagery). I have reverted this changeset.
naoliv (2017-03-21 05:25:43+00:00): Essa "Avenida Aprovada" que você mudou o nome, não é a Rua Luis Gomes da Cruz?
Glassman (2017-03-20 22:45:48+00:00): If you want to step up your editing skills, square the building when you have it drawn. Just select the building and use the square icon.
GinaroZ (2017-03-20 23:45:03+00:00): Did you remove the highway tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93334640 by mistake?
tms13 (2017-03-21 07:31:18+00:00): Yes - good catch.  Now fixed.
iandees (2017-03-20 21:47:14+00:00): Good afternoon! Thanks for adding this data to OpenStreetMap. In the future, could you please try to hit save in the editor before you move on to another area of the map? This makes reviewing changes easier for the rest of the community. Thanks!
Glassman (2017-03-20 22:40:46+00:00): You might want to remember to change the commit message each time you save and upload. Although I forget all the time but it really helps others if you try to remember.
Goffredo (2017-03-20 22:51:24+00:00): Ma... questo sentiero esiste! e la falesietta in cima è attrezzata per l'arrampicata..... ci fanno i corsi roccia. Almeno, fino a tre mesi fa
demon_box (2017-03-20 23:23:38+00:00): Davvero? Ci sono passato sabato e di sentiero io sinceramente non è ho visto traccia ma se ne sei sicuro lo rimetto immediatamente. Dimmi te.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
Ciao
demon_box (2017-03-20 23:43:59+00:00): Ciao, ho rimesso la parete di arrampicata ed il sentiero aggiungendo soltanto trail_visibility=bad perchè credimi che dalla strada non si vede nulla....
Goffredo (2017-03-22 19:56:23+00:00): Ciao, il sentiero esiste, ne sono certo. Stanno facendo i lavori quindi hanno eroso la parte iniziale, probabilmente. Se ho tempo verifico nei prossimi giorni.
demon_box (2017-03-22 20:27:33+00:00): Ottimo, ti ringrazio ancora. Ciao
PlaneMad (2017-03-21 12:24:28+00:00): Hi, you just accidentally renamed Harare on the map. Have fixed it now!
Hjart (2017-03-20 22:11:04+00:00): Så vidt jeg kan se af https://danmission.dk/hvem/historie/ er DSM/Santalmissionen sammenlagt til Danmission i 2000. Bemærk også https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcharity
osmviborg (2017-03-20 22:47:09+00:00): Wiki'en omtaler det som som en del at Danmission. Ser på det i morgen.
Wulfmorn (2017-03-20 21:43:49+00:00): tiny islands should be islets :)

anything under 1 sq km
Gerald Smith (2017-03-21 00:28:48+00:00): Made the change, thanks for the info :)
Chetan_Gowda (2017-06-22 07:18:52+00:00): Hi RecklessRivers,
OpenStreetMap is a free editable map of the world. This is the real map of the world. You added a fiction water in this changeset and it doesn't even exist in sort of imageries. Please be careful while you edit the map. To learn editing on OpenStreetMap, click https://learnosm.org.
Commodoortje (2017-03-20 22:50:46+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-03-20 23:06:23+00:00): Eerst dacht ik niet aan een restaurant bij de naam Vlas Graan & Koffie, maar de website laat duidelijk zien dat hier goed vertoeven valt.
► De openingstijden zul je nog even naar kunnen kijken.
Een handig hulpmiddeltje is deze tool:
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
bus-mt (2017-04-01 20:35:04+00:00): maxspeed=* gilt für beide Richtungen, bei unterschiedlichen Richtungen soll lt. Wiki maxspeed:forward und maxspeed:backward verwendet werden. Wenn Wisepilot damit nicht umgehen kann, gehört das als Fehler an die Entwickler gemeldet, nicht die Daten falsch angepasst ("Tagging für den Renderer").
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-10 14:56:57+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3552908 ? (sorry for bothering you about ancient edit but I am adding support for surface editing in one of editors and research meaning of unusual surface values)
letihu (2017-04-03 19:34:27+00:00): Achte doch bitte darauf Tore mit den Wegen zu verbinden ;-)
Z. B. hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4745943830/history
Jo89195 (2017-04-02 20:39:46+00:00): Ist der Wald wirklich alles wetland? imho der Wald ist hier stellenweiße relativ trocken
Nachtspazz (2017-04-03 07:02:38+00:00): Das ganze Gebiet wird Rote Wand genannt und ist ale Ganzes ein typischer Auwald. (Und für Auwälder kenne ich kein anderes Tagging als "wetland"). Ich weiß nicht, ob es sinnvoll wäre, dies noch in Zonen unterscheidlicher Feuchtigkeit einzuteilen, aber mir würden dafür die Daten fehlen.
Jo89195 (2017-05-07 15:09:32+00:00): Evtl. sollte der Wald dann an dieser Stelle aufgetrennt werden?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.36970/9.99125
Nachtspazz (2017-05-21 21:57:18+00:00): Hallo,

habe jetzt wetland auf das eigentliche Schutzgebiet und den Auwald an der Illerspitze beschränkt:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48870933
eggie (2017-03-21 08:27:03+00:00): Wellicht heb je wel interesse in dit draadje ivm OV
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=637396#p637396
eggie (2017-03-21 08:29:38+00:00): Op het forum ben je van harte welkom. Je kunt je evt. voorstellen onder het draadje 'Welkom'.
iandees (2017-03-20 23:16:05+00:00): Hi! I reverted your changes because the line didn't seem to coordinate with any real-life feature and the trees you converted into a park don't seem to align with any park in the area. If you have any questions about this change, please let me know by replying to this message.
iandees (2017-03-20 23:21:51+00:00): Thanks for adding this park! Keep up the good work.
Zverik (2018-01-12 11:44:14+00:00): Hi Jose,

In this changeset, you changed names of many bars to "Bambú Beach Bar". For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4449224226/history

Why is that?

Ilya
Alexander-II (2017-03-22 11:22:52+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap. Не нужно описывать создаваемые предметы в поле name. Оно предназначено только для названий (имён собственных). То, что фонтан - это фонтан - понятно из типа объекта. А названия у него, скорее всего нет. Так же как "кормушка для птиц" и "зеленые насаждения".
Alexander-II (2017-03-22 11:36:48+00:00): А поменяв natural=wood на leisure=park, вы тем самым затерли информацию о растительности (деревьях), заменив ее на другую по смыслу сущность https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park?uselang=ru место для отдыха/времяпровождения (с покрытием в виде травы). Это правку придется отменить. Она не несет ценности, лишь портит данные.
Stereo (2017-03-21 11:09:53+00:00): Great to see you’re active in our area again :)
Polyglot (2017-03-21 21:43:35+00:00): Yes, little by little. In fact I'm preparing a new GSoC project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code/2017/JOSM_Plugins Trying to find issues with the PT_Assistant plugin
Stereo (2017-03-22 14:46:25+00:00): Awesome! The 2016 vintage has been so useful, it's great that you're going for it again. There has been no interest in my GSoC proposal so far – any takers for yours?

I'm seeing duplicate ways being introduced, and I'm not sure whether it's the plugin:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27542711 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481435946
Stereo (2017-03-22 14:47:54+00:00): Two more:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481437499
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56092848
Polyglot (2017-03-22 15:44:35+00:00): I'm afraid it's probably me
HubMiner (2018-08-15 01:14:43+00:00): Please add English translation.
mvexel (2017-03-21 01:39:57+00:00): Thanks for the edits and welcome to OSM!
Constable (2017-03-21 10:59:53+00:00): sir, would you be so kind to start using proper changeset comments?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
BCNorwich (2017-03-21 07:33:33+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. 
The info in the fire station POI you added is already contained on the amenity=fire_station area outline. I've removed the extraneous POI which no extra data.
Regards
Constable (2017-03-21 11:09:29+00:00): sir, why did you add those paths to the American River relation?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2811720#map=16/38.5664/-121.4193&layers=N
I'm going to remove them from the relation, please pay more attention next time you deal with relations, they're quite tricky
Cheers
Constable (2017-03-21 11:14:36+00:00): sir, did you see this http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/935237 ?
FTA (2017-03-21 01:44:21+00:00): Hey Chris! Thanks for your great edit and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If you have any questions, don't hesitate to give me a shout.
Happy Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA
manoharuss (2017-03-22 11:37:33+00:00): Hi ListenOrange,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is greatly appreciated. OSM aims to be a live map of the real world. Understand that your edits are useful for the wider audience and carry a great reach. If you were a user of OSM and relied on OSM for your daily map usages, knowing that a station you regularly travel by is deleted because of clutter does not seem reasonable. There are a lot of other ways you can contribute to the map. Ex: Adding roads and buildings in your neighborhood. Further you can micromap certain things like adding height information for buildings. There are a lot of exciting things and possibilities. But I would not suggest deleting already mapped features for aesthetic or personal purposes.

Thanks.

Manohar