piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mtmail (2020-02-17 15:09:11+00:00): Can you please use meaningful changeset comments? "W" for the last 100 changes, even the "Willingers" doesn't give an indication what got changed. It makes the work of other mappers easier.
JayMac4033 (2020-02-17 19:04:04+00:00): My sincerest apologies!  I am new to OpenStreetMap and use it solely as a resource to map golf courses for my golf simulator software.  I will immediately start doing a better job of descriptions.  Under the context of my intentions with this resource, would a canned comment of "XXX Golf course mapping" be adequate or do you believe it would be necessary to provide an overview of the exact changes (such as "mapped XXX golf course hole 1?").  I absolutely love the availability of this resource and the developers who created the software to accommodate the creation of courses in the simulator...  Point me in the right direction to be in compliance and I assure you all future descriptions will be noted as such.
phidauex (2020-02-17 20:51:27+00:00): Hi Jaymac, thanks for mapping - we've noticed a lot of additions to golf courses recently due to the use of the data in the simulator, it is a clever use of the data and everyone benefits from the more accurate maps.

For changeset comments, they are mostly used in the moment by people who are reviewing local changes to make sure they are correct, and in the future by mappers wanting to understand why the previous editor had changed something (perhaps years in the past). They don't need to be in depth, but something like, "Adding details to Lake Ridge golf course from aerial imagery" would usually be sufficient. If what you are changing isn't obvious, say, Bing has the old course and Maxar Imagery has the new course, an explanation helps people know what you did, "Adding details to golf course from Maxar, most updated imagery in this location".
JayMac4033 (2020-02-17 21:28:07+00:00): Got it!  Thanks for the help!
mtmail (2020-02-18 14:05:00+00:00): Thanks a lot both. I'm mostly remote mapping (outside my city in Germany) and either research addresses not found (house to street connections, broken city relations) or tag values not following a format, e.g. 6 digit US zip codes. Adding a comment which type of object you edited already helps. All the best from Germany.
mueschel (2020-02-17 08:49:39+00:00): Hi,
when uploading data from the GPS, please make sure to remove the raw GPS information like time and hdop - this information is not needed in the OSM database.

Thanks!
Bacana (2020-02-17 12:46:26+00:00): ok, tks
mapman44 (2020-02-17 06:41:26+00:00): Hello, Julie Paquette, and thanks for your edits. Could you please save edits in their local area rather than edits on opposite sides of the world in the same changeset? Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81085489
Carnildo (2020-02-18 22:33:02+00:00): The user is editing using maps.me.  As far as I know, the app gives no control over when or how much it uploads, so world-spanning bounding boxes are normal for it.
maraf24 (2020-02-24 13:50:47+00:00): Te poprawki są zbędne.
maro21 (2020-02-25 00:18:37+00:00): Dziękuję za opinię.
maraf24 (2020-02-24 13:52:21+00:00): access=yes
maro21 (2020-02-25 00:21:40+00:00): poprawiłem
InsertUser (2020-02-17 08:16:05+00:00): What was the copyright notice on the brochure?
Aaron Axvig (2020-02-17 19:22:59+00:00): No copyright noted on it, it is a serially copied (near unreadable) version of a map that a visiting boater made many years back.  He played a lead role in getting many of the trails created in the first place. The visitors center distributed hard copies and other versions are available online.
InsertUser (2020-02-18 21:40:41+00:00): That's a little awkward, OSM normally prefers either explicit permission or statement of a compatible license if the copyright hadn't expired. Any chance of contacting the author?
Aaron Axvig (2020-02-19 17:41:03+00:00): Sure there is a chance, his name is Skip Hird and someone claimed that his email address is A-Guertin@hotmail.com.  That does not resemble his name so I just assumed some weird typo and that it is not actually the correct address.  But I will see if I get a response.

I have removed some of the trail names now.  The ones that remain are named based on sign posts that I personally observed.
maraf24 (2020-03-16 19:53:14+00:00): Ale usunałęś nazwę drogi...
wrobelwroblasty (2020-03-16 20:02:03+00:00): Racja. Przepraszam idę to naprawić.
wrobelwroblasty (2020-03-16 20:03:23+00:00): Jak teraz tak wchodzę w edycję tej drogi to jest nazwa drogi.
maraf24 (2020-03-16 23:15:15+00:00): Bo poprawiłem wszystko, co trzeba było:)
To był tylko komentarz techniczno-informacyjny, bo czasem edytujący chcą mieć szansę na sprawdzenie, jak i dlaczego się pomylil (o ile się pomylili-zawsze mogło się zdarzyć, że nazwę drogi dopiero co znieśli:)
wrobelwroblasty (2020-03-16 23:27:55+00:00): Aha. Dzięki za informację przy okazji na przyszłość będę zawsze patrzył czy są nazwy dróg po poprawie.
ralley (2020-02-17 07:11:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for  your edit.  Not sure why you have tagged the track with layer=-1?  That is used to indicate that an object is underneath others (i.e. in a tunnel etc)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81090019
David Teirney (2020-02-17 08:04:41+00:00): Whoops, that's an error from one of the options presented by the editor when the path crossed through the building (before I split the building into the 2 real buildings present, which was the correct resolution). I assume there's a way to edit a changeset to remove changes that aren't correct - I'll find out.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81090019
ralley (2020-02-17 08:26:02+00:00): No problems, it's easy enough to delete the layer=-1.  Let me know if you need a hand
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81090019
viloan (2020-02-17 04:25:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
btwhite92 (2020-02-21 15:39:58+00:00): Freeways *do not* have RIRO access to adjacent properties; neither do they have bike lanes. The complete lack of access to adjacent properties is, in fact, a defining feature of a freeway. This is not "obviously and undoubtedly" a freeway, especially in a country with a national standard for a freeway (interstate), which this roadway does not meet.  Please stop tagging every roadway with two grade-separated interchanges in a row as 'motorway'.
Fluffy89502 (2020-02-21 17:04:06+00:00): Freeways do permit bikes on them. In California by default bikes are allowed on freeways unless otherwise signed. See Cal. Vehicle Code section 21960. The part north of Kearny Mesa Road could be argued as not a freeway, but the rest of the road clearly is a freeway, w/ multiple sources listing it as such.
Fluffy89502 (2020-02-21 17:05:19+00:00): Also Interstate standards are not freeway standards. Freeway standards only require separate grade access and a divided highway, while Interstates require more.
Fluffy89502 (2020-02-21 17:16:29+00:00): For example, Interstate 5 in northern Los Angeles County permits bikes on it.
btwhite92 (2020-02-22 22:10:29+00:00): There is a difference between a freeway permitting bikes in the shoulder and a roadway having dedicated, marked bike lanes. Freeways do not have bike lanes, nor sidewalks for the same reason. This doesn't address the fact that this roadway provides direct access to properties, something that is explicitly prohibited in a US freeway design. This is a nearly textbook expressway.
Adam Franco (2020-03-09 14:54:47+00:00): Hi iggujja, I'm not super local to this area, but from the satellite imagery it looks like Bonnyvale Road actually goes through this new road segment you added and the old alignment is now a dead-end? Is this something you can confirm? Whichever segment is continuing through to Guilford Center road should be the same classification as the rest of Bonnyvale Road, not highway=service.

Best, Adam
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81090699
iggujja (2020-03-10 05:48:55+00:00): Hi Adam,
Thanks for identifying the error and responding. I've unintentionally added a service road here. Apologies for the edit, I've corrected the error under changeset #81992740
Regards,
iggujja
AkuAnakTimur (2020-02-26 11:54:34+00:00): Care to explain why these tags are removed?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1813724314/history
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-02-27 03:05:17+00:00): thank you for notice this error.it should be correct right now. its remove accidentally due smoothing and splitting the road.
jodd (2021-10-29 22:08:02+00:00): Hallo Ankasch,

du hast mit diesem Änderungssatz dem Gebäude Bleichstraße 3 den Gebäudetyp Einzelhandelsgebäude, den Namen "VGF BLST" und den Betreiber "Stadtwerke Ffm. Holding" hinzugefügt. Ich vermute, dass das so nicht ganz passt.

Einzelhandelsgebäude scheint mir nicht zu passen oder sind dort wirklich hauptsächlich Geschäfte?Steht am Gebäude wirklich ein Schild mit der Aufschrift "VGF BLST", das sich auf das ganze Gebäude bezieht? Auch wenn die Leitstelle der VGF dort ihren Sitz hat, muss ja nicht gleich das ganze Gebäude so heißen.

Bist du dir sicher, dass der Betreiber des Gebäudes die Stadtwerke Frankfurt am Main Holding ist?

Ich würde sonst vorschlagen, die Leitstelle als separaten Knoten einzutragen und die genannten tags vom Gebäude zu entfernen. Wenn du dabei Hilfe brauchst, gib gerne Bescheid.

VG jodd
Supaplex (2020-06-18 13:51:49+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
AkuAnakTimur (2020-03-31 08:16:16+00:00): Hi, some comments.

Hopefully your team will be extra careful with some certain descriptive tags e.g. let's discuss with this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/773042541/history

Take with absolute care on tags of source= and tiny details e.g. surface=*, lit=*, lanes=* etc.

I'd recommend your team to remove all those if AI outputs will going to be added/appended/overwrote non-existing/existing data.

Otherwise, there will be so much confusion about what's going on with the data.

Compare with my edits: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=78562201
AkuAnakTimur (2020-03-31 08:17:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756453682/history
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-04-01 02:05:53+00:00): Halo bang. Sorry for the inconvenience. 
1. Thank you to describe how data changed incorrectly. 
2. Actually we are trying to restore all data to be original (Existing) or AI Overwrote data in existing and especially that have been surveyed..
3. I really hope you can give some clues, about which areas have changed, the location and detailed description of the changes. in this discussion forum : https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=67801 or osm changeset discussion. 
on the other hand, we cannot respond quickly any other platform or social media.
4. I want to change back hWAY: 756453682 to your version from changesets/81092012/,

Terimakasih Bang.
damjang (2020-02-21 16:11:41+00:00): Ciao! Ma si è spostata proprio la sede o solo la sede legale? Se solo la sede legale l'indirizzo non va cambiato, perché li non è via capodistria.
cocio (2020-02-22 04:25:08+00:00): ciao. sia la legale che operativa.
damjang (2020-02-24 14:24:52+00:00): Ok, allora bisogna spostare il tutto all'indirizzo attuale.
damjang (2020-02-24 14:33:10+00:00): Spostato.
UKChris (2020-02-17 16:29:13+00:00): Hi, your edit seems to have created a lot of warnings within the iD Editor, such as:

-Foot Path crosses Service Road
-Foot Path crosses Bristol to Exeter Line
-Foot Path crosses Bristol to Exeter Line
-Foot Path crosses Cycle & Foot Path
-Foot Path crosses River Tone

... which might require the creation of some bridges across the railway lines and river.

However, would a pavement along an A road be better served with adding "sidewalk:left/right/both;" to the A road itself?
wilpin (2020-02-17 17:44:28+00:00): Hi

Good point about the errors; had forgotten this would throw up bridge issues.

Yes, sidewalk left/right will solve the problem but as with most cities & large towns  routes are becoming more of an issue and plotters are having to

resort to extra highways to indicate where the path deviates from the main road and where you can cross to enable active routing on a mobile/gps.

 The problem affects A & trunk roads in particular.

Will check this out.
user_5359 (2020-02-17 16:47:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
maraf24 (2020-02-27 21:04:25+00:00): Wg autor to nowy singletrack.
W jaki sposób zweryfikowałeś, że drogi  nie ma?
aachso (2020-02-17 09:15:26+00:00): Hallo Oecher92 und willkommen bei OSM!

Das Tag bicycle_road impliziert, dass hier keine Kfz durchfahren dürfen. Laut http://www.aachen.de/de/stadt_buerger/verkehr_strasse/verkehrskonzepte/radverkehr/Fahrradstrassen/index.html gibt es eine Freigabe für Kfz.

Ich kenne aber die Beschilderung vor Ort nicht. Kannst du motor_vehicle=yes (Kfz frei) oder vehicle=destination (Anwohner frei) je nach Beschilderung hinzufügen?

Schau auch mal hier ins Wiki für weitere Tags, die sinnvoll wären: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle_road
Molengekkie (2020-02-29 19:00:15+00:00): Danke für deine Anmerkungen, habe sie berücksichtigt!
Kovoschiz (2020-02-17 08:59:43+00:00): Please check Gazette. That section is Lin Cheung Rd, not Austin Rd W.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81100379
cronoser (2020-05-18 22:34:22+00:00): Hola;
por favor no quites la etiqueta landuse=residential de las áreas residenciales. Veo que la has cambiado por place=hamlet, esa etiqueta ya está puesta en el nomble o nodo del pueblo.
Un saludo
Seraq (2020-05-19 15:00:20+00:00): Hola cornoser, entonces ¿cuál es la forma correcta de mapaear una aldea, pueblo etc.?
Muchas gracias,
Seraq
Leo Slager (2020-02-17 10:08:48+00:00): Dag ilCigno,
Je vraagt om een review :
Alle begin is moeilijk en er zijn veel "weetjes".
Gebouwen en adressen worden rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster.
De vorm van de gebouwen dus beter niet aanpassen. Bij de volgende import wordt de oude vorm weer teruggezet.
Als er iets niet klopt, kun je een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster :
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=186804.505&geometry.y=428060.17992859&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0268100000011965&detailsObjectId=
De adressen omvatten dan ook informatie over deze import. Met het verwijderen van de adressen is die informatie verloren gegaan.
Laat je hierdoor niet ontmoedigen, we hebben in het verleden allemaal wel eens fouten gemaakt.
Veel plezier met verder mappen.
Ik zal de changeset reverten.
user_5359 (2020-02-17 16:45:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6106223222/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way.I move the node back to the original position.
user_5359 (2020-02-17 16:29:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Cheeto (2020-02-18 03:01:49+00:00): Can I haz changeset comment?
eggie (2020-04-03 17:56:16+00:00): reverted by changeset #83048670
ralley (2020-02-18 03:27:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  For MTB tracks they should be atgged as highway=path instead of leisure=track, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking for MTB guidelines.  Thanks, Rob.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81103070
JenTreg (2020-02-20 09:03:39+00:00): Thanks Rob, I've edited them now, hopefully I've got the right format this time :)
ralley (2020-02-21 03:48:26+00:00): Looks good to me, thanks very much.
vorpalblade-kaart (2020-02-19 15:58:51+00:00): Can you please make your changesets more geographically precise? (i.e., if you make modifications in Kentucky and then in one in California, they should not be in the same changeset).

It makes it harder to QC an area with OSMCha (or see editors in an area with OpenStreetMap History) when there are changesets spanning most of the country that only modify three ways and eight nodes.
mitesl (2020-02-20 07:56:14+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for  your response. This usually happens when iD editor doesn't respond while editing and we refresh the web-page. I was unaware of the change being saved.I shall follow restricting it to an area and avoid such long edits.

Regards,
mitesl
vorpalblade (2020-02-20 13:24:18+00:00): I've had issues with iD not being responsive before.

Its one of the (many) reasons why I use JOSM.

You might want to look into using JOSM. Its a bit more complicated than iD, but if you are editing for more than an hour or two a day, it is well worth learning.
mitesl (2020-02-21 07:07:06+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for the suggestion, our team is currently working on the migration. We shall soon change the editor. Alternatively we're also looking at identifying and correcting edits that are abnormally far.
Thanks again for your help! 

Always happy to learn from the community! 
Regards,
mitesl
freebeer (2020-02-23 04:46:14+00:00): as for identifying edits that cover too large an area, once an edit has been uploaded and saved, you cannot change its area.

as far as i know, there is nothing to change after the fact; the two edits that form the bounding box visualised in the changeset overview were probably correct and the only thing to change is to split them into separate edits by saving and waiting for the save to complete before going on to edit elsewhere, or invoking a new instance of iD in a new tab or window, with the overhead and the time which on my machine seems to border on an eternity, whilst Potlatch 1 is up nearly as fast as I can click through the startup (while being not suited for general editing these days).

i don't know what sort of correction your team is considering after the fact - a revert is possible but also covers the same large area with the problems reflected in the original, making a second changeset covering multiple us states to appear in the history tools, and bringing no benefit as both sets of edits would need to be repeated, losing time.

i can't see how identifying and correcting the problem changesets could help, but perhaps i'm not thinking outside the bbox enough, so i (and probably others) would like to hear details about this proposed course of action.
Hjart (2020-02-17 09:45:04+00:00): Bemærk at ændringer af vores importerede adresser automatisk vil blive tilbageført af vores bot. Den korrekte fremgangsmåde er at kontakte kommunen, som så kan foretage rettelser i den centrale database
user_5359 (2020-02-17 16:29:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
voschix (2020-03-23 17:23:53+00:00): Could you please check way 722847465. Does it really end without connection behind the Casa di Riposo? 
I corrected the tagging of the way - removed access=yes (wrong), and motor_vehicle=no (redundant).
Kovoschiz (2020-02-17 13:35:27+00:00): Please don't make them buildings without specifying they are underground. `layer=` has no such meaning.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81104015
G1asshouse (2020-02-17 10:07:28+00:00): Added added two businesses.
ralley (2020-02-17 16:50:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Generally most houses in NZ consist of mainly 90 degree corners.  In the ID editor if you right click on an area you can choose to square it (shortcut Q) and make all the corners 90 degrees.  Thanks, Rob.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81104204
Anil Basnet (2022-12-13 08:25:18+00:00): Wrong mapping. Rocks were mapped as houses.
Sowa1980 (2020-02-26 16:56:30+00:00): Привет, подскажи за чем был удален существующий участок дороги, который вносил augxcgrwxo?
lcat (2020-02-29 17:24:09+00:00): Я удалил пешеходник и нарисовал заново ближе к перекрестку
user_5359 (2020-02-17 16:29:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ACarlotti (2020-02-21 16:18:49+00:00): I don't think this is a correct fix - you've just changed one incomplete mapping of the car park into a different less accurate mapping of the car park (the 'dead end' you removed was the exit from the bottom of the spiral ramp; you've redirected it to connect to an exit from the ground floor).
Mike Baggaley (2020-02-21 16:53:00+00:00): Apologies for getting this wrong. The ways were already connected, but with the opposite direction in one segment, which looked wrong. I've reverted and added amenity=parking_entrance on the dead end. Could you please check this is now correct? Thanks, Mike
Kovoschiz (2020-02-17 13:35:00+00:00): Please don't make them buildings without specifying they are underground. `layer=` has no such meaning.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81105513