piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCGIS (2018-12-27 16:09:58+00:00): Yes, all of the mobile homes have now been removed from the area.  The last ones were removed this fall.  The area will likely become new commercial development in the future.
iandees (2018-12-27 16:24:55+00:00): Gotcha. Thanks for the update!
Carlos Brys (2018-12-29 12:54:14+00:00): Estimado juanchy04, las casa que agregaste en este conjunto de cambios, aparentemente las copiaste yba TODAS le pasaste etiqueta :
"description 	Servicio Tecnico Informatico"
Sugiero revisar la edición y rectificar el error.
patofu (2022-01-27 21:54:14+00:00): Hallo Aalen1,

Heißt der peak wirklich "Höhholz" im Gegensatz zu "Hohholz" dem Hügel?

Ist mir nur aufgefallen, da es mir ein bißchen merkwürdig erschien.  Eventuell ein Fehler, oder ist es so tatsächlich richtig?

Besten Dank jedenfalls schon mal und Grüße!
sommerluk (2018-12-28 10:27:38+00:00): 👍 Merci beaucoup !
eggie (2018-12-27 15:50:50+00:00): Oke.. je bedoeling is ongetwijfeld goed. Nr 28 bestaat hier al. Dat is import van het Kadster. Daar graag op bijtaggen. Twee adressen geeft verwarring.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-27 16:21:00+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
mavl (2018-12-27 16:28:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65817674 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: duplicates, undiscussed import].
abakus_uploader (2018-12-27 23:30:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
arcanma (2018-12-27 16:38:27+00:00): Benvenuto Riccardo, vedo che è la tua prima modifica, grazie per aver iniziato a collaborare al progetto. Se fisicamente la piscina ancora esiste è preferibile non cancellarla, magari un giorno viene riattivata. Per ora l'ho reinserita e ho messo abandoned:leisure=swimming_pool, a seconda dello stato potrebbe essere usato anche disused:leisure, vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:
Un saluto
Laci (2019-02-21 14:07:24+00:00): Szia! Légyszives ne válzoztass mellékutakat és autópályaösszekötő utakat főutakba!
Rich1234 (2018-12-27 17:23:58+00:00): Was there a reason why you deleted all of my 3D building (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings) data for The Doctors building here?  It is now back to a simple rectangle and has lost all of the 3D elements that I added back in September.
apm-wa (2018-12-27 17:33:46+00:00): Building footprint was not correct.  The Doctors Building's footprint is a simple rectangle.  I am presently located about a mile away and can photograph it using Mapillary to provide a perspective view if that would be helpful.
apm-wa (2018-12-27 18:22:17+00:00): My apologies.  My bad.  I confused it with another building.  Just shot and uploaded a Mapillary image. Let me take a shot at restoring your 3D elements.
Rich1234 (2018-12-27 18:52:02+00:00): Reverting the change set would be the easiest way to restore the 3D elements.
Rich1234 (2018-12-27 19:01:11+00:00): Ah, but looking at it more closely, there is more in the change set than just The Doctors Building edits.  So a simple revert would leave your other edits in limbo.
apm-wa (2018-12-27 20:47:37+00:00): Well, this is probably what we could call a "teachable moment" for me.  I don't mind trying my hand at manual restoration of the 3D lines if you would be willing to check the work.
apm-wa (2018-12-27 22:50:56+00:00): Here, please take a look at let me know if this looks right.  Heights are estimates based on eyeballing the Mapillary image.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65826920
Rich1234 (2018-12-27 23:20:38+00:00): I can do that, or I can do some experimenting with trying a partial reversion (the JOSM reverter plugin has a checkbox for 'partial reversion', I've just not yet attempted to do a partial).

The reason I suggest trying reversion is that adding in the 3D lines was tedious, but straightforward, with the buildings plugin for JOSM.  But I used ID for about a year before switching to JOSM, and so I can say with confidence that using ID to add the 3D lines back in will be a gigantic pain.  If the partial revert works, then the deleted lines come back, but your other edits should remain in place.
Rich1234 (2018-12-28 00:14:57+00:00): The changes in 65826920 are very close.  The building:levels and building:min-level tags are missing from the parts, and two of the parts don't fully connect (this is likely a symptom of using ID to make this complicated of an edit).

I can fix up the remainder if you like, since I can obtain the prior tag's values on the parts via. JOSM's reverter plugin.
apm-wa (2018-12-28 00:56:48+00:00): Sure, if you're willing, that sounds like a good fix.  Which two parts didn't fully connect?  Just curious.
Rich1234 (2018-12-28 15:34:04+00:00): See the image here: https://postimg.cc/FdTFYSR0

Note, I checked in ID, and ID does not show this, it seems to show that everything connects.
alod (2018-12-27 20:01:27+00:00): Пожалуйста, разбейте эту огромную фигуру на более простые. Желательно использовать мультиполигоны.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65816921
freebeer (2019-05-13 20:50:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70208917 where the changeset comment is: fake maps.me bogus home castles with personal info
Warin61 (2018-12-27 22:24:32+00:00): Hi,

Looking at relation 9157945 ... a house. 

What are you trying to map here? 

As a simple building it has a simple outline. The easiest thing to do would be to map the outer way as a house and move on.

But you have an area that looks like a carport or garage. So - map that as a simple way ... and then map the house separately excluding the carport/garage.

If you what to get fancy with different levels in the building then you use the tag building:part=* .. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

Note - none of these are relations.
Gazer75 (2019-01-04 10:47:43+00:00): Please learn how to do relations and multipolygons. This edit broke a big wood relation. Landuse in Norway is not built with closed polygons connected.
scai (2019-01-04 11:02:51+00:00): Whoops, sorry. Should be fixed now. I wonder why JOSM didn't warn me about breaking the multipolygon. Unsure if it has such a validation check, though.

Thanks for the hint.
Gazer75 (2019-01-04 11:09:07+00:00): I applied a bit of a bigger fix now to make them multipolys. Kind of strange that JOSM didn't warn, the wood relation was clearly not closed.
mavl (2018-12-27 16:29:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 65790946, 65791052, 65791129, 65791200, 65791253, 65791331, 65791460, 65791515, 65791782, 65791907, 65792201, 65805447, 65806480, 65806500, 65806509, 65806530, 65806654, 65806955, 65807009, 65807064, 65807202, 65807866, 65808067, 65808113, 65808184, 65808380, 65808548, 65808799, 65808900, 65809033, 65810493, 65810514, 65810720, 65810779, 65810974, 65811251, 65811268, 65811843, 65811904, 65812063, 65812174, 65812203, 65812303, 65812318, 65813077, 65813356, 65813615, 65813725, 65813865, 65814448, 65814839, 65814999, 65815449, 65816237, 65816322, 65816403, 65816699, 65816750, 65816840, 65816849, 65816984.
mavl (2018-12-27 16:32:25+00:00): Old wrong changeset comment. Must be:  
  
The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2403].
Akkurator (2019-01-13 22:27:58+00:00): Kannst du mir bitte den Grund nennen, warum du diese beiden Zufahrtswege gelöscht hast, die ich 2 Tage zuvor eingezeichnet hatte?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570680971
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657921290
Da die Gebäude, zu denen sie führen, recht neu sind, glaube ich nicht, dass diese Wege entfernt wurden. Irgendwie muss man ja an die Gebäude kommen.
user_8613419 (2019-01-13 23:03:08+00:00): Dort gibt es keine Weg, nur ein großer Platz voll Kies und eine Hecke.
Akkurator (2019-01-13 23:58:37+00:00): Das sieht auf ziemlich aktuellen Luftbildern aber ganz anders aus.
Du meinst also, dass die blau gezeichneten Zufahrten nicht existieren?
https://www.bilder-upload.eu/upload/73f3af-1547423655.jpg
https://www.bilder-upload.eu/upload/f4ed60-1547423716.jpg
Tomas Straupis (2018-12-27 18:40:48+00:00): Ištrintas CRAP.ME šlamštas.
PT-53 (2019-08-05 14:26:12+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe,
keep right zeigt für diese Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9157993/history einen Hinweis "fehlender 'nach' (to), Relation 9157993" an:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=108076261
Müßten da nicht 2 Relationen "nur geradeaus" angelegt werden?
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Peilscheibe (2019-08-05 15:05:56+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
der Regelsatz von Keepright ist nicht ganz auf dem Laufenden. Es wird angemeckert: "A turn-restriction needs exactly one to member. This one has 2"
Die angemeckerte Relation ist eine no_exit-restriction die per Definition mehrere to-Members haben kann (und genau deswegen erfunden wurde, damit man eben nicht mehrere Abbiegebeschränkungen taggen muss).
Wenn ich es richtig in Erinnerung habe, wurden die no_exit und no_entry-Relationen irgendwann 2012 eingeführt.

Das hier genannte Ausfahrverbot ist insoweit richtig getaggt und auch sachlich richtig, weil dort in Richtung Bundesstraße ein Zeichen 267 StVO steht und keine Einbahnstraße beschildert ist.

Grüße, P.
PT-53 (2019-08-05 15:56:03+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe, 
ich krieg gleich einen Anfall!
Ich hatte nur im deutschen Wiki nachgeschaut, wo no_exit nicht aufgeführt ist.
Sorry
Peilscheibe (2019-08-05 17:02:39+00:00): :-)
Der JOSM-Validator meckert das auch immer noch an. Für den habe ich mal ein Ticket erstellt, das wollte ich schon seit Jahren mal machen ;-)
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/18014

Für Keepright gibt es seit 2017 ein offenes Ticket hierfür (https://github.com/keepright/keepright/issues/77), das scheint aber nicht mehr weiterentwickelt zu werden.

Grüße, P.
shiva@hogan (2018-12-27 16:55:19+00:00): #hoganlovells
topolusitania (2018-12-27 22:31:48+00:00): Olá
Sugiro que consultes fotos satélite mais recentes para esta zona. Deixou de ser uma farmland. Como utilizaste os caminhos como limites, a actualização da área é muito mais difícil. Pequena central solar, novas plantações (vinhas? olivais?), Talvés o Luis Forte possa dar uma ajuda (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/luisforte)  ;-)
Reino Baptista (2018-12-28 10:48:25+00:00): Topolusitana,

Obrigado pelo aviso. 

O foco aqui foi atualizar a "Anta da Herdade das Azinheiras". A classificação da área envolvente veio por acréscimo pois verifiquei que, de acordo com o fotos satélite "Bing" e com o mapa "Strava cycling and running heatmap", a anta não estava acessível por nenhum caminho, mesmo pedestre. Achei importante que o OSM demonstrasse tal.

Nada bate o facto de saberes que não uma "farmland", pelo que retirei a área referida. 

Relativamente à referida "dificuldade" não compreendo. Com o editor JOSM, é possível editar pontos, linhas e áreas qualquer que sejam as circunstâncias incluindo a sua sobreposição. Calculo que no editor "Potlatch" não existam as mesmas ferramentas e capacidade. Apenas experimentei o "Potlatch" nas minhas primeiras edições pelo que não conheço a versão atual. Assim que experimentei o JOSM este passou a ser o meu editor de eleição pois parece-me ter ter mais capacidade e ferramentas disponíveis.

O que encontro disponível no JOSM é "Ortofotos DGRF 2004-2006 (WMS)" que apresentam precisamente o mesmo que o "Bing". Onde é que posso consultar as fotos satélite mais recentes para esta zona? Obrigado. 

«Pequena central solar, novas plantações (vinhas? olivais?» Onde? Logo aqui?  Que "azar"...
RB
topolusitania (2018-12-28 15:55:03+00:00): Olá
Muda o mapa de fundo. Pelo menos no Potlach é possível fazê-lo com um simples click, estando disponíveis agora os seguintes mapas:
Bing
Digital Globe Premium
Digital Globe Standard
Esri
Esri Clarity
Mapbox
Na zona, o mais actuao (com problemas de off-set) é o Digital Globe Standard. No entanto, ás vezes alterando o zoom, noutros fundos pode mudar a data das fotos.
Quando me refiro à dificuldade de alterar áreas, linhas sobrepostas, etc, refiro-me aos "recém chegados" que em geral usam o ID.
Cumprimentos
Reino Baptista (2018-12-28 19:00:37+00:00): Olá,

No JOSM também existem todos os que mencionaste. Costumo utilizar o Bing, o Esri Clarity, o Strava cycling and running heatmap e o OpenStreetMap GPS Traces. A partir de agora vou também "passar a dar uma oportunidade" aos Digital Globe. 

Confirmo que com o "Digital Globe Standard", que é datado de Maio de 2015, consigo ver o acesso mas nada mais do que terreno agrícola no espaço envolvente.

Obrigado pela edição que fizeste. O terreno agora está limitado por uma vedação e classificado com  landuse=farmland. Obrigado por o teres feito. Penso que é suficiente para que se perceba que não há acesso público ao local. 
RB
ajf3934221 (2018-12-27 22:47:13+00:00): Hallo Kirsch53!
Das ist ein sehr schönes Changeset, vielen Dank für das hinzufügen von zahlreichen Feldwegen. Schön dass Du auch Oberflächeneigenschaften hinterlegst. Gerade tracktype, surface und smoothness sind von hohem interesse z.B. für Fahrradfahrer um Ihre Routen zu optimieren. Sehr schon auch dass Du GPS Tracks aufzeichnest und hochlädst. Falls Du irgendwelche Fragen zu gps oder etwas anderem hast, kannst Du Dich gerne jederzeit melden. 

Grüße, 
Andy
muzirian (2019-01-03 06:20:09+00:00): hey can you please add changeset comment too
Delta P (2019-01-03 06:25:32+00:00): Traco cables company- A govt company
muzirian (2019-01-03 06:32:58+00:00): It would be helpful if you add a small summary of edits with each upload on the box when you click save.
Delta P (2019-01-03 06:34:50+00:00): OK...done...
Carnildo (2018-12-28 07:28:20+00:00): I'm not sure how useful it is to add "bicycle=yes" to most of these roads.  The default for routing in the USA (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_States_of_America) is that bicycles are permitted on everything except footways and motorways.

Adding "bicycle=designated" to signed bicycle routes is useful, as is adding "bicycle=yes" to the sections of interstate that permit bicycling.
Leo Slager (2018-12-28 00:31:55+00:00): Op de website van Qbuzz is geen bevestiging te vinden voor de naamswijziging van de bushalte.
In de dienstregeling is het nog altijd "t Waoen van Rijsoord"
viloan (2018-12-27 17:38:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Carnildo (2018-12-28 07:44:51+00:00): "cycleway=shared_lane" should only be used when there are actual lane markings indicating that a lane is used by both bicycles and automobiles: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shared_lane
southglos (2018-12-27 23:23:58+00:00): Hi

Welcome to OpenStreetMap - thanks for your edits!

Just a couple of queries - you've changed Wildings into another Prezzo, so we have two next to each other.  I think Wildings is still there, so I'll edit it and change half that building back into Wildings and join the two Prezzo bits together.  If that's not right, shout!

Also - the "gender problems"?  It was labelled as male and female toilets, and you've removed male=yes.  Are there no gents loos there any more?

Cheers,

Paul ("southglos")
southglos (2019-01-14 17:09:53+00:00): I've put male=yes back on the toilets, as I've verified this building contains both ladies and gents loos.
loml (2018-12-27 18:09:20+00:00): changeset was reverted
maraf24 (2018-12-27 18:01:14+00:00): Bzdura.
Zverik (2019-01-04 09:33:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for monitoring oneway street signs. In this case though, you were relying on outdated information: the city flipped these directions in August: https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2018/08/23/west-60th-street-traffic-changes-manhattan-nyc-dot/

I work in Juno and we had around 50 rides just yesterday driving in directions opposite to yours.

I have reverted your changeset, so you don't have to. Thanks for mapping!
ggando_lyft (2019-01-04 16:40:21+00:00): Hi Zverik! 
My name is Gizelle, I am apart of the OSM Mapping Team at Lyft. We appreciate you in letting us know about this error and reverting the change. 
As the change in the directionality of this road was so recent we didn't have a resource that was up to date enough to catch it. 
In the future we will do better at checking the changeset history to account for recent changes that local mappers have made. 
Best, 
Gizelle
Zverik (2019-01-04 20:19:37+00:00): Hi Gizelle,

I guess you have a source to check such things — after all, you work at a ride sharing company and have all the GPS traces :)

On my side, I'll ask our managers if they would allow publishing our traces in form of tiles, so that everyone could reference these for OSM. We have millions of rides a month, every road is covered multiple times, so that should be a pretty reliable source for your edits.

Ilya
ggando_lyft (2019-01-04 23:52:45+00:00): Hi Ilya!
Having up to date traces available to the OSM community would certainly be helpful for making accurate edits. We look forward to hearing updates from you.  Feel free to contact our team on github https://github.com/OSM-DCT-Lyft/US

Best, 
Gizelle
kreuzschnabel (2018-12-29 10:38:35+00:00): Wenn ich in einen CS-Kommentar „nach Begehung“ schreibe, meine ich damit, dass ich da langgegangen bin. Der RP ist genau da, wo ich ihn hingeschoben habe :)
DD1GJ (2018-12-29 10:54:46+00:00): Sorry, Der "Neue" hing am Waldpolygon und der Ursprüngliche war gelöscht.. Ich habe den Ursprünglichen als Einzelpunkt an diese Stelle geschoben.Jetzt stimmt wieder alles incl. Historie. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/617211820/history
VitalieS (2020-09-24 04:55:04+00:00): Bună,
Puteți să ne confirmați că Organic Shop de pe str. Alecu Russo, 1 s-a închis definitiv?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/65821143
eggie (2018-12-27 18:45:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
simlox (2018-12-27 18:28:48+00:00): source=survey
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2018-12-28 06:48:00+00:00): สวัสดีครับ ยินดีต้อนรับสู่ OpenStreetMap

สำหรับสิ่งที่คุณเพิ่งบันทึกลงแผนที่ไป ต้องย้ำนิดหนึ่งว่าแผนที่นี้ เป็นแผนที่จริงที่คนจริงๆ ใช้, ฉะนั้นถ้าคุณทดสอบโปรแกรมแก้ไขดูจนพอใจแล้วแล้ว ให้ปิด *โดยไม่บันทึก* ก่อนจะเริ่มทำของจริงนะครับ

ผมได้ย้อนการแก้ไขทดสอบของคุณออกไปให้แล้ว ด้วยชุดการเปลี่ยนแปลง 65832616 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65832616>.

สู้เขานะครับ

ป.ล. ช่องที่โผล่มาให้กรอกตอนบันทึกนี่ เอาไว้ให้เขียนสรุปว่าคุณแก้อะไรบนแผนที่ไปบ้าง คราวหน้าก็อย่าเขียนมั่วๆ เหมือนคราวนี้นะครับ

Hello there, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Regarding what you just saved on the map, please note that this map is real, and used by real people. When finished testing out your editor, *exit without saving*, before starting to do the real thing.

I have now reverted the test edit for you, via changeset 65832616 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65832616>.

Stay calm, and keep mapping.

P.S. The box that the editor asked you to fill when you save is for you to briefly explain what you just changed on the map. Don't just fill in gibberish next time, okay?
☆Finvenkulo (2019-12-08 20:01:00+00:00): EO: Ĉu ne estus pli bele, se tiuj punktoj havu plennombrajn koordinatojn?

EN: Wouldn't it be nicer if these points had integer coordinates?
oba510 (2019-01-02 02:28:28+00:00): This was changed back to a 2-way street about 3 months ago.
tordans (2018-12-27 19:22:10+00:00): Hi Heat Lair, I saw you requested a review. I wonder if the stream maybe is underground for part of the way? Because on the aerial images, it looks like there are houses in the way. Also some road. In those cases, it is better to split the stream and mark those parts that are under ground as „tunnel“. ID Editor has a checkbox for that. - Have fun mapping!
viloan (2018-12-27 19:20:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Frans S (2019-01-05 13:27:00+00:00): Hello Yvonne. Thanks for mapping on this project. I review tasks in order to validate them. A few remarks. Please square all relevant buildings with the S key in ID editor. Try to avoid nodes connection to other buildings. The images are token under an angle. so it seems sometimes a building likes a trapezium, but is just rectangular, so map them next time with just 4 nodes on the corners.
Best regards and please keep mapping
chachafish (2018-12-28 15:15:26+00:00): Howdy ;) Thank you for your additions to the map. Just in case you weren't aware, some of the addresses added here popped up as errors because the minimum requirements for addresses are 1) a street number and 2) a street name. You can see the wiki here. Thanks :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
Mr_Brown (2018-12-28 15:44:10+00:00): I was already warned by JOSM that some of these were going to be a problem. I surveyed this neighborhood one day and only captured housenumbers. The cul-de-sacs are named differently than the adjoining streets, and I didn't expect the numbering to be as contiguous between the street and the cul-de-sac, so I was paranoid about tagging an incorrect streetname. I'm not familiar enough with the area to make an educated choice. 

Without Mapillary, OpenStreetCam, any kind of open address datasource, or just driving back to the neighborhood, I don't know how to finish it. 

If it's too much of a problem, the data can be deleted and someone with more resources or more local to the area can re-add it.