piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2020-10-20 16:38:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:38:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mueschel (2020-10-18 10:59:09+00:00): Something went wrong here. You added hundreds of toilets and pharmacies in the middle of nowhere.
mueschel (2020-10-18 11:03:20+00:00): I reverted this changeset - coordinates of all POI are wrong.
Mashin (2020-10-16 18:42:50+00:00): Hi,
just a tip for those walls. You can map them as a simple way with combination tags barrier=wall + wall = dry_stone

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wall%3Ddry_stone
hocu (2020-10-23 12:26:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for the contribution. Is this place "Akbank" or "Teknosa"? Because there are tags that indicate the place name is Teknosa. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92527364
Nicolas Pablo DelaTierra (2020-10-23 19:18:02+00:00): The Teknosa signage outside refers to a shop inside the shopping centre. see my google maps contribution for this place as i have provided ample pictures and details about the bank.
hocu (2020-10-24 09:54:32+00:00): Hi thanks.

But apparently the existing Teknosa node/poi is used to add Akbank. I'll have to remove Akbank names from this POI, then someone knowing the exact location could move it inside the building.

Thanks again, keep contributing 👍
k_zoltan (2020-10-15 14:11:07+00:00): https://geoportal.ancpi.ro/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=3636729de6c94787aee0899565d0a515
GartenStuhl (2020-10-15 14:31:43+00:00): Hallihallo Stärneliechtli
Was möchtest du hier machen?
habi (2025-06-04 06:32:46+00:00): Es sieht so aus, als wollte jemand die einzelnen Parzellen aufm Camping erfassen.
Dies sollten aber nicht mit `name`, sondern mit `ref` erfasst werden.
marczoutendijk (2020-10-15 18:32:24+00:00): Hi Haval mapper!
Many oy your change comments read:
"Bunch of improvements".
You would help others more if you would give some details about those improvements.
Please read the wiki about that:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thank you for your cooperation.
Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Hevał (2020-10-17 19:50:40+00:00): Hi marc 
I edit alot of places in one changeset I can’t name them all including street alignment, new buildings, names, new general places, etc... but sometimes i do, 
Thank you for warning me I’ll try to use one of those improvements in history box to improve my speech
Best regards
-Haval
I’m not in a group so I can’t type my group hehe
marczoutendijk (2020-10-18 09:04:10+00:00): But you can read about that group here:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group
Hevał (2020-10-18 13:02:38+00:00): Hmm interesting but who asked
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:41:33+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:41:43+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках.

С уважением,
Энди
Vinber (2020-10-16 14:47:03+00:00): Bonjour,
pourriez vous mettre les POI dans les bâtiments svp ?
cela vaut pour celui-ci mais aussi :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92528923
Par avance merci
Je pense que vous pourriez également préciser la nature des mises à jour que vous faites :)

Ensuite cela semble toujours être Ubiflow.net dans Created_by, est-ce le cas ou pas ?

Et pour finir, il me semble qu'une page ici serait la bienvenue : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Organised_Editing/Activities

Cordialement
Hb- (2020-10-26 13:13:54+00:00): Please avoid an edit war over village names.

Do use name:hy=ArmenianName together
with name:az=AzerisName and name:ru=RussianName and so on.

You won't win a war as keyboard warrior.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-28 20:56:22+00:00): Also, it'd be really helpful to know what the source of these names actually was.
TheTylerS (2020-10-15 14:49:03+00:00): Comment should be : Added missing alley south of Ampang Jaya  #adt ; Source was Bing Aerial Imagery
homer__simpsons (2023-05-24 19:57:27+00:00): Pouvez-vous préciser / corriger ?
letihu (2021-02-16 21:05:11+00:00): 482 Punkte für ein Gebäude?
letihu (2021-02-16 21:06:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8010232663/history
hocu (2020-10-23 12:22:58+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution. Is this place actually called "Shoemaker"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92530118
Nicolas Pablo DelaTierra (2020-10-23 19:19:01+00:00): This is an old style shoemaker and he had no business name, so i guess Shoemaker is appropriate perhaps.
hocu (2020-10-24 10:05:59+00:00): Hi again.

On OpenStreetMap, name is used for the actual/official name (could be on signage) and it's displayed on the map. If you're not sure about the name, you should leave it blank and someone else who knows might add it later. If you leave the name, map applications will still use a relevant icon without a name. I'll remove the name. If you'd like to know more you can always visit OSM wiki [0] or resources like learnOSM [1].

The map grows thanks to contributions by people like yourself. So please keep contributing. Cheers.

[0]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
[1]: https://learnosm.org/en/
wille (2020-10-16 13:00:47+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição, pois você desalinhou algumas ruas.
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92530499
eggie (2020-10-15 15:37:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review Wanneer het pad bijFlraweg begint klopt het. sidewalk =none is een tag die neit kan kloppen. Een pad kan wel of niet een trottoir langs het pad hebben.
Die tag moet dus weg. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92530533
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-15 15:49:28+00:00): sidewalk=none heb ik verwijderd.. Dat is een tag van de voorgaande mapper.
Dit is een tag die hier geen enkele functie heeft. 
Over de Kade lopen fiets- en wandelroutes . Die kun je eigenlijk niet goed bewerken met editor iD. Hier is het gelukkig wel goed gegaan. 
gr eggie
Ceesie (2020-10-15 15:52:39+00:00): OK, prima en bedankt voor de info. Ik ben nieuw in OSM mapping en editing. Ik woon in de buurt en vond dit een goede case om editing te proberen. Cees
eggie (2020-10-15 15:58:50+00:00): Lokale kennis kunnen we altijd gebruiken..in de eigen buurt beginnen is wel handig. De edits aan de overkant zijn deels van mij. Daar stond ik met mn tentje. 
Veel plezier met mappen.
Gr eggie
Chisom (2021-09-30 13:50:37+00:00): Hello Sanjeet, please confirm; did you confirm the mapping you carried out on site via the gpx file?
mavl (2020-10-20 16:38:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
bbmiller (2020-10-17 23:24:00+00:00): Looks good! Thanks for contributing!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92531697
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-18 06:41:45+00:00): Czemu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859350087 ma "primary_link"?

Teraz to jest highway=motorway
mavl (2020-10-28 16:40:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 93184081 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, deleting of existent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4124].
mavl (2020-10-20 16:38:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
!bm (2020-10-15 15:59:07+00:00): fix für viel früher falsch verschobene stop_position: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92532702
mavl (2020-10-20 16:38:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
catjam (2020-10-16 02:14:39+00:00): heads up! no need to name it private driveway, but everything else looks good bro

welcome to openstreetmap ;)
skyper (2021-02-25 17:18:34+00:00): Salut

Ist die Baustelle noch aktuell?

Grüße skyper
Drooter (2021-02-25 21:56:49+00:00): Nein, die ist beendet. Aber eigentlich hatte ich sie in einem weiteren Änderungssatz auch schon entfernt.
Grüße Drooter
skyper (2021-02-26 02:47:25+00:00): Nee, da sind immer noch ein paar `highway=construction` dazwischen.

Ist die gesamte Südtangente wieder frei befahrbar?
Drooter (2021-02-26 06:16:41+00:00): Ja, alles frei befahrbar
skyper (2021-02-26 13:05:10+00:00): Danke, sollte jetzt wieder frei sein. Da waren Stücke mit `construction=*` und `highway=tertiary` dabei, sowie kleine Stücke mit `highway=construction`.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2021-03-01 21:04:12+00:00): Wie sieht das mit den Zugangsbeschränkungen aus? Zwischen Schlösslehöhe und Hauptstraße ist `bicyle=no`, `foot=no` und `horse=no` eingetragen. Stimmt das so?
Drooter (2021-03-01 21:13:23+00:00): Streng genommen gibt es meines Wissens nach keine Zugangsbeschränkungen für Pferde und Radfahrer. Es gibt auf jeden Fall keinen Fußweg. Es empfiehlt sich aber für Radfahrer nicht, diese Straße zu benutzen. Parallel verläuft mit den Straßen im Ort auch eine sehr gute Alternative.
geo_roads (2020-10-15 17:52:53+00:00): Hi coker111. Please do not add fake data to the map.
Polarbear-repair (2020-10-16 17:04:17+00:00): Hallo bdcinside,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. 
 
Wenn du an so bedeutsamen Objekten editierst wie dem BER ist es unbedingt notwendig, dass du sowohl sinnvolle Changeset-Kommentare angibst. Der JOSM fordert dich ausdrücklich dazu auf, bitte ignoriere das nicht. 
 
Weiterhin ist es notwendig, dass du die Quelle deiner Änderungen angibst. Hier hast du das Rendering der Kartendaten angegeben, das ist keine Quelle für Änderungen. 
 
Konkret hast du durch das Löschen eines Zaunabschnitts die Flughafen-Relation zerschnitten. Was wurde aus dem Zaun in der Realität? Die Relation habe ich erstmal repariert. 
 
Weiterhin hast du etliche highway=stop gelöscht, worauf gründet sich das?

Viele Grüße
Polarbear
user_5359 (2020-10-16 05:41:08+00:00): Hello! We do not draw the two banks of a canal as away but the canal Please also pay attention to the spelling: use source instead of sorce
Bernhard W (2021-09-25 22:09:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145116020
hast du geändert von "oneway = no" auf "oneway = yes". Darf der Weg nicht mehr in beide Richtungen befahren werden? Wurde die Beschilderung geändert? (Ende 2019 war Radfahren noch in beide Richtungen mittels Schilder freigegeben.)
cabinetcourbi (2020-11-10 10:23:47+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour la qualification des voies de bus guidées ce ne serait pas plutôt des voies de bus en site propre ?
En effet les bus quidés sur wikipédia sont des bus ayant des contraintes spécifiques que je n'ai jamais vues sur Avignon.
blackboxlogic (2020-10-17 23:10:06+00:00): Thanks for adding these buildings with their address information. When you do this, please delete the old address nodes so that there are not TWO elements with the same address. Welcome to OSM, ask if you have questions, and happy mapping. -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92533786
mavl (2020-10-20 16:38:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
Amegaz (2020-12-29 16:49:32+00:00): Hi GPSfriend,
Du stehst als letzter Änderer bei dem Zaun um den REWE in diesem Änderungsatz. Das ist WAy 602934480 . Der Zaun ist an der Kölner Str. Nicht so wie eingezeichnet. So wie er eingezeichnet ist, versperrt er einen kleinen Weg, aber ich meine, dass er viel kürzer ist.
Kannst Du das bitte prüfen? Ansonsten komme ich da die Tage auch vorbei und schaue es mir an.
Viele Grüße 
Amegaz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92534187
SjoerdPerfors (2021-01-19 11:09:28+00:00): Dag Jeroen,

Even doorgaand op de comment van de parallelweg waar we het hebben gehad over de TOTSO. Deze weg is gemarkeerd als een link. Navigatie systemen genereren geen instructie bij _links als je er niet af moet (zoals een afrit) dus ondanks dat de weg een slight_left heeft komt hier om die reden geen instructie, anders krijg je bij elke afrit ook een slight_left instructie.

Daarnaast vroeg ik mij af waarom deze weg een link moet zijn, naar welke belangrijke weg gaat deze weg? Als dit een normale weg is dan genereren we automatisch een instructie om links aan te houden.

Ik kreeg dit als feedback:

"According to satellite imagery and the markings on the road, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60228900 road shouldn't be "_link" road. 
By the OSM specification this isn't a _link, it's a regular road. 
It's a road that continues straight, it's not a connecting road to some other, major road.
Both Google and HERE don't mark this road as a "_link", the thickness reflects it.

If that was a regular road, then we would generate "bear left" advice."

Graag jouw gedachten hierover! Hopelijk is dit een oplossing voor ons probleem.
SjoerdPerfors (2021-02-01 13:51:50+00:00): @JeroenvanderGun wil je nog eens jouw licht hierover schijnen?
JeroenvanderGun (2021-02-01 15:03:14+00:00): Het is functioneel toch duidelijk een verbindingsweg van de S100 naar de S103, ongeacht hoe de markering op het asfalt eruit ziet. In de omgekeerde rijrichting moet je juist weer wel uitvoegen als een afrit.

Je opmerking "anders krijg je bij elke afrit ook een slight_left instructie" klopt niet, bij een reguliere afrit zul je iets als turn:lanes=none|none|slight_right aantreffen, dus zonder slight_left.

Zo nodig kunnen we hier ook een Relation:manoeuvre gebruiken om het links aanhouden expliciet te maken.
SjoerdPerfors (2021-02-09 13:05:14+00:00): Zouden we een relation:manoeuvre kunnen gebruiken? Kan je mij daarbij helpen?
SjoerdPerfors (2021-02-16 15:02:23+00:00): Hoi Jeroen, Kan je mij helpen met de relation:manoeuvre?
JeroenvanderGun (2021-02-16 22:16:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12326480
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12326481
SjoerdPerfors (2021-02-17 08:46:03+00:00): Bedankt ! Erg leerzaam ook.
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
Peter Newman (2020-10-19 13:07:44+00:00): For info this isn't actually correct, I got caught out on this too. building=terrace is for when you've mapped the whole run of terrace as one building:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace

@harg's building=residential or better yet building=house:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
Frans S (2020-10-17 12:01:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
muralito (2022-01-09 18:32:03+00:00): Hola. ¿De donde sale el cambio de nombre a "Camino Uruguay"?

En el sitio de IMM sigue apareciendo como Camino a la Cuchilla Pereira...
Departamento de Geografía - MIDES (2022-01-09 23:59:07+00:00): Buenas, mucho gusto. Por contacto con vecinos, así lo han llamado en la zona a la calle. De todas maneras entendemos que haya que mantener la formalidad de dejar los nombres que la IMM tiene registrados. 

Saludos, 
Mathias
muralito (2022-01-17 12:57:12+00:00): No lo planteaba por un tema de formalismo, solo tenia la duda. Hay veces, aunque he visto pocas, que la IMM tiene mal los datos (no se si en el SIG, en los registros o resoluciones o en donde) y son distintos a la realidad.

En OSM hay distintas variantes de nombres que se pueden usar. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
Para este caso, siendo nombre local, creo que lo mejor seria usar la etiqueta loc_name="Camino Uruguay" y name="Camino a la Cuchilla Pereira".
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
parsd51 (2020-10-15 17:23:43+00:00): Hej Tntdroid

Hvad er din kilde for at rette f.eks
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4485581/history
til cykelsti? 

Hilsen
parsd51
parsd51 (2020-10-15 17:38:56+00:00): Hej Tntdroid

Hvad grunden til at der sættes bicycle og foot designated på en cycleway tagget med sidewalk right?

Hilsen
parsd51
Hjart (2020-10-15 18:18:41+00:00): Livrem og seler?
ftcat (2020-10-16 05:47:51+00:00): Hi uliwanne,

Be careful deleting buildings that do not appear in the imagery you are using, such as Bing, it does not mean they are not there as Bing is often out of date. Much of the building details added by Akros Global Health are from ground surveys and the information is used for anti malaria work. If you remove the information these houses may not be sprayed. Better not to remove details you not sure of. Be fully aware that satellite imagery in this region is not always up to date and try to use multiple sources
uliwanne (2020-10-16 08:52:09+00:00): Hi ftcat
i think I delete only buildings not recangle and not to see in the image. I create it new at the correct position.
uliwanne (2020-10-16 10:42:07+00:00): In this region there are more of these buildings. The source Akros Global Health is not the result of an survey with this angles.
What we will do in this region with the buildings?
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:37:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 04:05:35+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD. Because the addr:city is not capitaliced and accent is missing. Please correct it. Thanks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92536883
bxl-forever (2020-10-18 14:07:53+00:00): Hello,
When you use highway=construction, do not forget to always use construction=* along with it (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction)
construction=cycleway?
Thierry1030 (2020-10-18 14:54:25+00:00): thanks for your comment. I did the necessary:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92659466#map=16/50.8806/4.3058&layers=CN
Ashton Baker (2020-10-15 17:59:23+00:00): The golf course has been defunct since 1942 (https://glenarborsun.com/a-history-of-fairways-and-pines-on-alligator-hill/) and the land was subsequently logged and later became a part of Sleeping Bear National Lakeshore.

I reviewed the page on Lifecycle Prefix (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) before deciding to completely remove this. I believe that the statement "Historic objects with no relevance to current state of an object generally do not belong in OpenStreetMap" applies here.

The main evidence for the outlines of the course appear to have come from satellite imagery. While it's true that the forest is younger where the former fairways were, I don't think that alone makes the old course a candidate for mapping.

One could make the argument that a lifecycle prefix such as "demolished:" or "was:" should be added to the features instead, but I don't think this changeset has enough historical veracity in the first place for that. Significant creative liberties appear to have been taken to interpret the course from vague satellite imagery, including hole numbers, par numbers, directionality, and sand bunkers for which there is no historical evidence.

Supplemented with additional historical data, this could make an interesting addition to Open Historical Map, but I don't think it has a place in OSM.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-15 20:44:17+00:00): Heel erg bedankt voor de update. Dat zit nu denk ik wel goed voor de komende tijd.
azakh-world (2020-10-16 22:40:25+00:00): Hello!
Please, when creating stop_positions could you also create stop_area relation combining stop_positions with station object? Like relation 11582832. The validation page http://osm-subway.maps.me/china.html shows where problems have appeared in Shenzhen metro.

Best regards,
Alexey
XD346 (2020-10-31 10:35:10+00:00): Thank you for your comment. If I have time, I will do so.
geo_roads (2020-12-10 19:18:25+00:00): Hi Brendan, thanks for mapping! Did you get these street names ("Kirkwood Road", "Gerald Street") from a local survey? If not, please do not add any names unless you know them.
eggie (2020-10-15 18:52:41+00:00): Oke Joepie.. maar voor zo'n korte tijd zou ik het niet eens met conditional-tags op slot gooien.
De format die ik gebruik is overigens als
voorbeeld: 
 access:conditional=no @ (2019 Sep 1-2019 Sep 30)
MVG,
eggie
joepie91 (2020-10-15 19:32:23+00:00): Aha, is er een specifieke reden om dat formaat te gebruiken? Mijn invulling is namelijk wat er uit een van de opening_hours-tooltjes kwam.

Ik heb de sluiting overigens toegevoegd ondanks de korte duur omdat het een centraal fietspad is; dus waar je ook naartoe fietst, een router gaat hem vrijwel zeker in je route proberen te betrekken.