piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
R0bst3r (2018-06-05 07:39:27+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Ich würde allerdings den Tag name zu old_name ändern oder im größeren Fall die OSM Lifecycle Prefix anwenden.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59513750
Dino Michelini (2021-07-21 11:54:45+00:00): Buongiorno, la modifica fatta basandosi solo su Wikipedia senza conoscere storia e luoghi è sbagliata. Secondo Livio Gasperini (conosce?) parte della prefettura romana si trova sotto la chiesa di san Liberato mentre altri resti di edifici, coperti dalla vegetazione, si trovano seguendo i basoli della Clodia (vedi ricerche di Francesco Stefani (conosce?). Prima di fare modifiche affrettate e sbagliate, se non conosce i luoghi, faccia ricerche più approfondite di Wikipedia (che non è verità assoluta e dove scrivono utenti non meglio qualificati, spesso citando fonti a dir poco ridicole), consultando siti specializzati quali academia.edu o pubblicazioni scientifiche quali sabatia stagna. Saluti
Pino Navato (2021-07-21 16:44:19+00:00): Grazie, ne prendo atto e le suggerisco di correggere anche Wikipedia così da evitare che qualcuno commetta il mio stesso errore.
Road–Runner (2018-06-03 19:46:14+00:00): wofür steht "Ga"?
praeteritum (2022-11-17 04:18:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129020129.
Jose Riha (2019-05-01 11:38:52+00:00): ahoj, co bolo myslene tym layer=-1? cyklocesta urcite nejde pod zemou alebo inou komunikaciou. vyhodim to teda.
praeteritum (2022-11-17 04:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129020106.
Anakil (2018-06-04 07:11:36+00:00): Hi Swa Wuyts,

I saw that you added a "test" line without tags (i removed it). 

Please do not add empty lines or polygons without meaning. This data is live when you click "save" and anyone can see it or use it ! It is used for a lot of purposes and by many companies, so please try to do good edits. Thank you ! :-)
Carnildo (2018-06-04 01:36:30+00:00): A quick tip: when you're working in Spokane County, Esri World Imagery is generally the best option.  Bing and DigitalGlobe Standard are usually a bit newer, and Esri Clarity usually has better contrast, but Esri World Imagery is far sharper than any of them, and almost always better aligned.
praeteritum (2022-11-17 04:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129019949.
praeteritum (2022-11-16 05:49:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128970292.
praeteritum (2022-11-16 05:46:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128970239.
Herman Lee (2018-06-03 17:45:51+00:00): 济南部分 Jinan（01-4）3
praeteritum (2022-11-15 05:35:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128918847.
aceman444 (2018-06-17 21:43:20+00:00): Hi, the shortcut through the railway is mapped completely wrong and it is not visible on any aerial imagery. If it really exists on the ground (not just that you think you can run there through the rails) it should be mapped properly (crossing points with the rails, no personal remarks into 'name' tag, no "risky paths" on parts where roads are actually visible, etc.).
Funny that you mapped a shortcut to a museum, which itself isn't even on the map.
praeteritum (2022-11-15 05:15:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128918109.
Anakil (2018-06-04 07:18:31+00:00): Hi KalahariBadger, 

I removed the node "Start" as it wasn't making sense or informative. When you edit, please make a changeset comment explaining roughly the changes you made. Also if you have good reason to add the node, please do it, but explain your change and add the correct tagging (look at the "OSM wiki" for more information about tagging). 

Thank you and happy mapping. :-)
Anakil
praeteritum (2022-11-14 03:32:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128870177.
eggie (2018-06-03 20:19:30+00:00): Volgens mij ontbrak de turnrestrictie zelf.. Ik even wat zitten otteren zowel met potlatch2 als met josm. 't Zou nu goed moeten zijn, maar niets is zeker. Er stonden zoveel leden op.
eggie (2018-06-03 20:23:30+00:00): Volgens mij is het nu goed. Je ziet nu in josm ook het verkeersbord.
eggie (2018-06-03 20:36:58+00:00): Nog een lege relatie eruit gegooid. Nu geeft validatie geen fouten meer aan op dit punt. Wel nog 433 waarschuwingen, maar daar zou ik me even niets van aan trekken. :)
eggie (2018-06-03 20:38:51+00:00): Nu staat op de node restriction=only_right_turn met als leden die twee wegen.
L'imaginaire (2018-06-04 07:32:24+00:00): Je kan als tags de combinatie oneway=yes (eenrichtingsverkeer) en oneway:bicycle=no (fietsers mogen in beide richtingen) gebruiken.
Lokai (2018-06-04 10:29:28+00:00): Hallo Hexe,

willkommen beI OSM.

Beim Restaurant habe ich wg. größe des Gebäudes Zweifel, dass das ganze Geb. eine Rest. ist. Daher nun ein POI.

Lesestoff: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office

Adios W.
maraf24 (2018-06-03 21:01:10+00:00): Edycja została wycofana.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-04 18:54:19+00:00): "Wszystkie drogi wojewódzkie to drogi drugorzędne." - bzdura, tak jak już to wielokrotnie tłumaczono. Proszę natychmiast zaprzestań tego typu edycji.
Dakon (2018-06-07 20:09:17+00:00): Na, ist da jemand auf der Baustelle rumgelaufen? ;)

Ich habe die Einstufung der Straßen mal korrigiert, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
aceman444 (2018-07-12 23:58:53+00:00): Zdravim, o tejto zmene nazvu ulice nie som uplne presvedceny. Podla VZN 1/2015 to naozaj vyzera, ze sa Uzka nachadza po celej dlzke hradieb: https://bratislava.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Dokumenty/Str%C3%A1nky/Chcem%20vediet/VZN/VZN%201-2015%20-%20%20o%20ur%C4%8Den%C3%AD%20n%C3%A1zvov%20novovzniknut%C3%BDch%20ul%C3%ADc%20a%20l%C3%A1vky%20v%20mestsk%C3%BDch%20%C4%8Dastiach.pdf . Preco myslite, ze je to len ten usek za hradbami?
Sape (2018-07-22 19:06:16+00:00): Zdravim Vas, dakujem za Vasu poznamku. Preto som si myslel, ze iba usek za hradbami (cize way 493777963) sa vola Uzka ulica, lebo v knihe "Ulice a namestia Bratislavy" od Teodora Ortvayho a na historickych mapach sa tato ulicka oznacuje ako "Uzka", kym ulicka na zapadnej strane hradieb este neexistovala. (Vznikla pocas vystavby Staromestskej ulice, zburanim domov ktore tam stali.) Tak som si myslel, ze ulicka na zapadnej strane hradieb nema nazov. Ale mate pravdu, podla Vami poslaneho dokumentu sa naozaj vola "Uzka". Vratite jej tento nazov, alebo to urobim ja? A este sa naskyta otazka, ci existuje nejaky zaznam o tom, ze ulicka za hradbami sa aj v dnesnej dobe vola "Uzka".
aceman444 (2018-08-22 17:09:19+00:00): Neviem, nemam iny zdroj ako toto VZN mesta. Tabulky s oznacenim ulice som na tom mieste zatial nepozeral.
Sape (2018-09-10 18:53:45+00:00): Hladal som tam tabulky, ale zial som tam nevidel nijake.
Leo Slager (2018-06-04 06:32:13+00:00): Daarbij zijn onbedoeld 3 van de 6 bus-routes beschadigd. Waarschijnlijk als gevolg van het opknippen in 3 delen van de Zeewolderweg. Is dat een bekend effect ?
Bus -routes weer gerepareerd.
Sander H (2018-06-04 17:42:51+00:00): Zal gefaald zijn omdat de heen en terugweg nu over een eigen aparte way gaan. Was op andere dingen gefocused en was me niet opgevallen dat busroutes lagen.
Bedankt voor het fixen.
Prusaker (2018-06-04 18:31:01+00:00): А зачем вы испортили улицу Чечота? Я переделывал её в 2-way, вы всё вернули как было.
Prusaker (2018-06-04 19:45:22+00:00): Улицу поправили. Пожалуйста, больше так не портите дороги.
LLlypuk82 (2018-06-04 20:01:46+00:00): Дорога широкая, многополосная (в каждом направлении), поэтому имеет полное право быть разделённой, что повышает уровень детализации участков дорог (скоростной режим, полосность и т. д.). И чисто топологически это более адекватно отражает реальность: нам не нужна ось широкой улицы, а нужны именно направления потоков (не путать с полосами)
JoeG (2018-06-03 18:48:38+00:00): This is a rather major edit, but it turns out the layout of Tapiola station was substantially wrong. Lift for the Ainoa indoor path from the ticket level should have been the same lift as on the bridge into the station. The position of the first lift inside the building is obvious from the building layout, but was located much further in. Escalators similarly needed to be moved inside the building outline, and entrance A onto the building outline. I'm sure there are still errors, but hopefully it now makes more sense (if you step through the layers one by one).
kirma (2018-06-04 03:35:12+00:00): I was curious of this underground layout and recently convinced myself that two elevators were actually the same, and general layout was botched (is it still a bit odd?). I hope this change doesn't mess up Reittiopas walk routing, though; it might see the elevator a bit too lucrative offering in comparison to escalators. An interesting part about this elevator is that although access between levels P1, P2 and P3 is free, and level 2 can be reached from these lower levels, access from level 2 downwards would seem to demand a parking hall ticket, or so I guess...
JoeG (2018-06-04 04:45:00+00:00): In my case, I followed someone else who took the lift from P3 to 2 and realised the layout was wrong (and that route is quicker).
Distances still seem wrong, but connections are now correct (at least, I was pretty careful), so routing is hopefully ok. I had to move the platform to make it this far, so I was hesitant to do more.
I'm not sure what restrictions reittiopas/opentripplanner respects, but it seems like it might be worth adding a one-way to prevent routing down the lift?
kirma (2018-06-04 04:59:47+00:00): I am curious on ways to mark the following: floors P1-P4 (-2 - -5 in the local schema) are free, floor 2 is free from all floors, but access from floor 2 to other floors would seem to be restricted. Being pedantic might be important (if routing tools even care!) since these elevators are on such a central location. I have chosen to be liberal with some practically private-access elevators (or those going to private floors 4-6) in neighboring Ainoa in order to allow routing of inhabitants on those houses to get sensible route suggestions, but this situation is a little different.
JoeG (2018-06-04 04:59:53+00:00): Looks like oneway has no effect for pedestrians (and isn't quite the right term in this case anyway)
https://github.com/opentripplanner/OpenTripPlanner/blob/master/src/main/java/org/opentripplanner/graph_builder/module/osm/OSMFilter.java#L155
kirma (2018-06-04 05:03:01+00:00): Maybe floor 2 could be somehow marked exit only?
JoeG (2018-06-04 05:07:16+00:00): I tried something like that in urheilupuisto (quickest exit towards tapiola is through a oneway door), but exit=yes didn't work at least
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5501156915
kirma (2018-06-04 05:09:47+00:00): Bummer. I hope HSL OSM editors notice this discussion, anyway. :)
Leo Slager (2018-06-04 13:47:27+00:00): Daarbij is de route van bus 300 beschadigd. JOSM geeft daar ook een waarschuwing voor. Daarna even de busroutes controleren of iemand om hulp vragen om de routes te herstellen. svp
Leo Slager (2018-06-04 13:50:29+00:00): Routes van bus 112 en 300 zijn gerepareerd.
85Bas (2018-06-04 19:17:06+00:00): Bedankt voor de oplettendheid en de reparatie, Leo! Helaas had JOSM mij hier geen melding van gegeven (al had ik het alsnog zelf in de gaten moeten houden natuurlijk).
praeteritum (2022-11-14 03:26:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128870070.
praeteritum (2022-11-13 02:36:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128832459.
PT-53 (2018-10-15 07:35:48+00:00): Hallo GO_OSM,
im OSM-Inspector werden bei Borwang und bei Haldenwang mehrere Hinweise "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.35305&lat=47.78811&zoom=14&opacity=0.28&overlays=ways_without_tags

Zumindest diese Linie ist von Dir: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593493066

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?

Fragende Grüße
praeteritum (2022-11-13 02:33:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128832445.
praeteritum (2022-11-13 02:31:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128832441.
tux67 (2018-06-04 06:13:56+00:00): Hallo mahagi,
danke für die Ergänzung im Bucholzer Wald. Du hattest um ein Review gebeten. Der Change sah soweit ganz gut aus, nur der Wegtyp passte mit highway=footway nicht ganz. Habe das (wie den Rest der Waldwege) auf highway=track und eine tracktype Angabe ersetzt. 
Gruß
Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59516130
flohoff (2018-06-04 05:44:48+00:00): Hi Jwu-Chris

du hast in diesem changeset mehrere Wege eingetragen jeweils mit access=yes. 
access=yes ist default und muss nicht getagged werden.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59349
5708

So long

Flo
praeteritum (2022-11-13 02:31:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128832415.
dariuszdawidowski (2018-09-10 15:02:57+00:00): Droga rowerowa kończy się przy drodze #593496845 potem jest chodnik dla pieszych.
literan (2018-06-04 12:58:04+00:00): Не совсем понял, зачем вы библиотеку перенесли на проезжую часть https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59516584 Откачу вашу правку.
Pikse (2018-11-18 09:58:03+00:00): Please note that no particular river is considered to flow through Võrtsjärv. Emajõgi flows out if and other rivers flow into it. You can check from environmental register [1] the extent of the Õhne River. So waterway segment 484353997 should not have a name.

[1] http://register.keskkonnainfo.ee/envreg/main?reg_kood=VEE1013700&mount=view
eggie (2018-06-03 21:13:17+00:00): Svp niet zelf adressen aanmaken in osm. Maak gebruik van de al aanwezige adresnodes. 
Beperk ook het aantal bijdragen in één changeset.. dat maakt controle makkelijker.
eggie (2018-06-03 21:13:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
eggie (2018-06-03 21:20:06+00:00): vedlhuizerschool dubbele tag verwijderd
eggie (2018-06-03 21:22:20+00:00): fontanis dubbel adres verwijderd
eggie (2018-06-03 21:25:40+00:00): nieuwe kerk dubbele tagging verwijderd

ga je svp zelf aan de slag? Graag reactie
tomdiks (2018-06-04 12:51:22+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback. Het was de eerste keer dat ik wijzigingen doorgaf en inderdaad vanuit Maps.me.
eggie (2018-06-04 13:03:38+00:00): Oke...   Probeer je edits naderhand te checken met een reguliere editor. Dit waren je edits. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59516766
Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen. Alle bijdragen zijn welkom... behalve alle "dubbelen"
..Alle begin is moeilijk. Bedankt voor je reactie
MVG, Eggie
flohoff (2018-06-04 05:46:25+00:00): Hi  Galbinus

warum hat dieser Path ein "motorcar=no" ? Auf einen path passen eh keine motorcars daher ist das doch über!?? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593499369
Galbinus (2018-06-04 18:23:41+00:00): Ich weiß nicht, wieso dieses access-Attribut da steht. Es stammt jedenfalls nicht aus meiner gestrigen Änderung und ist mir auch nicht aufgefallen, als ich diesen Weg einer Wanderroutenrelation hinzugefügt hatte und ein paar Kurven korrigiert habe.
Galbinus (2018-06-04 18:28:24+00:00): Ich habe das natürlich sofort korigiert
Alecs01 (2018-06-03 20:54:15+00:00): Ciao, per convenzione non si usano le abbreviazioni nei nomi, anche se è molto lungo, è corretto come era prima
praeteritum (2022-11-13 01:38:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128831813.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-03 20:17:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 50380859, 50390031, 50390466, 50390636, 50391185, 50391261, 50391325, 50391676, 50391905, 50392035, 50392150, 50392194, 50392410, 50413554, 50415094, 50415213, 50415319, 50415607, 50415688, 50415706, 50415784, 50415826, 50415863, 50416027, 50416051, 50416369, 50427884, 50427957, 50431522, 50431757, 50431954, 50432432, 50432552, 50432604, 50435686, 50435839, 50435951, 57775440, 58217624, 58800501, 58801804, 58818482, 58818853, 58820573, 58820711, 58821498, 58821572, 58821874, 58822297, 58822780, 58823014, 58825051, 58825318, 58825558, 58825588, 58826182, 58826904, 58827598, 58828217, 58828384, 58829231, 58829408, 58829552, 58829885, 58830734, 58830791, 58855364, 58855595, 58855622, 58855965, 58856528, 58856862, 58857013, 58859286, 58859354, 58859565, 58859635, 58859826, 58859906, 58860564, 58861092, 58877950, 58878421, 58878863, 58879059, 58879717, 58880248, 58880502, 58881249, 58881475, 58883557, 58883623, 58883769, 58884239, 58884757, 58884839, 58885047, 58888063, 58888249, 58890004, 58890157, 58890559, 58890626, 58890835, 58923602, 58923784, 58923921, 58926045, 58926996, 58928462, 58928655, 58928692, 58928836, 58929324, 58929935, 58930330, 58930466, 58957828, 58957873, 58957895, 58957929, 58957954, 58957968, 58957992, 58958009, 58958030, 58958100, 58958128, 58958171, 58958195, 58958220, 58958248, 58958281.This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 50380859, 50390031, 50390466, 50390636, 50391185, 50391261, 50391325, 50391676, 50391905, 50392035, 50392150, 50392194, 50392410, 50413554, 50415094, 50415213, 50415319, 50415607, 50415688, 50415706, 50415784, 50415826, 50415863, 50416027, 50416051, 50416369, 50427884, 50427957, 50431522, 50431757, 50431954, 50432432, 50432552, 50432604, 50435686, 50435839, 50435951, 57775440, 58217624, 58800501, 58801804, 58818482, 58818853, 58820573, 58820711, 58821498, 58821572, 58821874, 58822297, 58822780, 58823014, 58825051, 58825318, 58825558, 58825588, 58826182, 58826904, 58827598, 58828217, 58828384, 58829231, 58829408, 58829552, 58829885, 58830734, 58830791, 58855364, 58855595, 58855622, 58855965, 58856528, 58856862, 58857013, 58859286, 58859354, 58859565, 58859635, 58859826, 58859906, 58860564, 58861092, 58877950, 58878421, 58878863, 58879059, 58879717, 58880248, 58880502, 58881249, 58881475, 58883557, 58883623, 58883769, 58884239, 58884757, 58884839, 58885047, 58888063, 58888249, 58890004, 58890157, 58890559, 58890626, 58890835, 58923602, 58923784, 58923921, 58926045, 58926996, 58928462, 58928655, 58928692, 58928836, 58929324, 58929935, 58930330, 58930466, 58957828, 58957873, 58957895, 58957929, 58957954, 58957968, 58957992, 58958009, 58958030, 58958100, 58958128, 58958171, 58958195, 58958220, 58958248, 58958281.
praeteritum (2022-11-13 01:32:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128831777.
praeteritum (2022-11-13 01:30:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128831771.
praeteritum (2022-11-13 00:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128831101.
eggie (2018-06-03 20:50:06+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Ik heb de landuse wat aan laten sluiten tussen dat gras en dat bos. 
Eigenlijk is iD daar niet zo geschikt voor . Kijk eens naar editor JOSM die heeft een ingebouwde foutencontrole.
Hulp kun je ook op het forum krijgen als je er niet uitkomt.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
PT-53 (2018-06-04 05:47:14+00:00): Hallo geo-ranger,
Deine Änderungssatz-Kommentare "GPS track" sind leider wenig Informativ für andere Mapper.
Änderungssatz-Kommentar sollten aussagekräftig im Sinne von "was wurde wo gemacht" sein. Siehe hierzu die Wiki-Seite Good practice: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_.C3.84nderungssatz-Kommentare
.
Grüße
Alecs01 (2018-06-03 20:53:05+00:00): Ciao, per convenzione in Italia i civici si indicano con dei nodi, sia perchè legalmente rappresentano un ingresso e non un edificio, sia perchè un edificio potrebbe avere più ingressi con civici diversi, per cui direi che andava bene come li avevi mappati prima.
user_5359 (2018-06-03 20:53:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add objects twice (once as building and once as node. But the way, what is the name of the cafe: "Latte Love" (node) or "Latte Lov" (way)?
30303020 (2018-07-06 15:30:11+00:00): Hey Kjon,
Wahrscheinlich war es nicht beabsichtigt, aber in diesem CS wurden auch die Relationen 229592, 7711811 und 78795 bearbeitet. 
Bitte keine Relationen mit iD bearbeiten, das zerstört ihre Reihenfolge oder erzeugt Lücken. 
Viele Grüße
30303020
eric_ (2018-08-10 12:55:12+00:00): Hi meadowgreen, I just removed the house number of the Greyfriars Kirk you added as there is no number associated to this building (only a postcode and a street name). I also changed its street name as well (Greyfriars place and not Greyfriars).
FredrikLindseth (2018-06-03 21:28:55+00:00): Ser ut som huset du tegnet inn her overlapper noen veier. 
Du burde enten justere huset eller veiene. 
Gitt at ikke veien går gjennom huset, da burde du legge på tunell=building_passage på den biten :-)
Torbjørn Gjerde (2018-06-03 21:43:18+00:00): Hei,

Takk for påpekningen. Det er en feil fra min side - hadde tenkt å endre arealbruken og blingset og valgte hus i stedet. Har endret til boligområde som planlagt.
praeteritum (2022-11-13 00:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128830836.
praeteritum (2022-11-12 23:17:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128830197.
eggie (2018-06-03 21:32:52+00:00): Dit is correct, want het is op de adresnode getagd. .
De "touristinfo" is een edit uit 2011 door TP01. Je kunt het hem/haar vragen. Geen idee of hier een touristinfo zit.
praeteritum (2022-11-12 23:08:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128829994.
lmagreault (2019-02-28 09:01:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir déplacé l'arbre sur le chemin du Grand Bois ?
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/4187320957
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59517770
ToniE (2018-06-04 11:48:45+00:00): Hallo Rainer,

wie sieht das Gelände denn inzwischen aus? Könnte man (teilweise) auf landuse=residential gehen? Immerhin sind doch schon einige Häuser (komplett) bewohnt, oder?

VG Toni
Rainero (2018-06-05 21:24:53+00:00): Hallo Toni,
ja stimmt, ein großer Teil ist bewohnt, insofern ist landuse=residential angebracht, auch wenn noch ein paar Restarbeiten ausstehen.
Ich habe das mal angepaßt.
Servus,
Rainer
praeteritum (2022-11-11 15:31:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128782122.
syntex (2022-06-24 10:41:56+00:00): Ten słupek na pewno istnieje? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5661900858
accek (2022-06-24 12:52:20+00:00): Rzadko bywam w okolicy. Nie jestem pewien, czy wciąż tam jest.
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2022-06-25 18:00:01+00:00): Nie ma tu żadnej bariery/słupka. Usuwam go.
R0bst3r (2018-06-05 08:11:20+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59517992
gileri (2018-06-05 19:35:39+00:00): Mince j'ai pas été assez clair dans mon message sur l'ancienne version, il faut remplacer le tag building=residential par landuse=residential, pas laisser les deux
praeteritum (2022-11-11 15:30:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128782103.
user_5359 (2018-06-04 04:04:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic key payment:credit_cards . This key should normaly only be used for negative value.