piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-12-15 16:05:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are rather precise, but not always squared. Please map buildings individually. Don't cluster buildings and map them as 1 building
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95873580
Frans S (2020-12-15 16:02:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95874018
Frans S (2020-12-15 16:02:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please use the correct imagery ,  don't connect buildings with their nodes and square each building.
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95874112
Frans S (2020-12-15 16:01:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. Please square all rectangular buildings and don't let building nodes connect to highways
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95874256
Warin61 (2020-12-17 11:15:56+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM... 

Name are not usually all caps. 

The name tag should ONLY be used for names , not descriptions nor for things that should be obvious from other tags e.g. stairs, lifts... See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

The 'name' 'PRIVATE ROOM #' looks to be more of a description or reference .. please see the OSM wiki for the tags description and reference...
Warin61 (2020-12-17 11:20:59+00:00): You may find JOSM to be a better editor for what you are doing... it certainly picks up more errors such as duplicated features, and self intersecting ways.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-15 16:25:40+00:00): Aside from `=permit` not `=permissive`, you need to check if non-goods vehicles are allowed there.
Dino Michelini (2021-01-10 19:33:46+00:00): Ciao vedo che sei alle prima armi su OSM e ti segnalo alcuni errori di mappatura. I nomei che dai sono di fantasia? Se non sono nomi ufficiali dati da un Ente (Parco, comune, IGM, Regione, ecc.) vanno cancellati.? Hai prima mappato con hitgway=track poi hai cambiato in cycleway ma sono entrambi sbagliati; per favore quando mappi prima leggi attentamente la wiki di OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway). Per favore sistema le cose... grazie
hatul (2024-11-04 09:36:02+00:00): שלום דב, המוזיאון כבר היה מסומן בבניין. אין צורך להוסיף נקודה. מיזגתי את הנקודה לתוך הבניין.
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:58:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. Please don't let highways cross buildings. (bad for the building if a car drives into it :-)   )
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95875949
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:56:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95876220
Matija Nalis (2021-03-24 03:17:15+00:00): popravio preostali dio duplih ways, otvorio par Notes za resurvey...
literan (2020-12-15 16:24:44+00:00): и зачем вы поудаляли мультиполигоны (без какого-либо обоснования)? Зачем удалили тег викидаты с Клязьмы? Потом, на М-11 нет никаких платежныйх рамок, это вы выдумали. 
Откатываю, правка практически вся деструктивная
blackboxlogic (2021-01-01 21:58:51+00:00): When a sign ends with "PVT" or "Private" that is not part of the name.
baigzake (2021-01-04 06:36:13+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of road name. Will ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy mapping!

Regards,
baigzake.
Katyyyyyyyyyyyyyya2 (2020-12-15 16:36:29+00:00): хороший напарник
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95876775
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:55:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. You crossed a few times a road with mapped buildings.  Don't let that happen. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95876806
opencarpatia (2020-12-17 16:38:52+00:00): Прошу перед внесенням нових змін відновити мої внески або пояснити причну їх видалення!

Please restore my contributions or explain the reason of their removal before making new changes!
mike140 (2020-12-15 12:41:54+00:00): В OSM тип объекта не принято писать в названии - для этого используют подходящие теги. Рекомендую статью в wiki на эту тему: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8 . Большое озеро, насколько знаю, уже не используется для добычи песка
hackthemap (2021-03-19 14:26:25+00:00): How is this bicycle designated AND highway footway? Is it just a path that is allowed for cycling and walking or is this a signed cycleway? Or is the bicycle and foot access implicit without signs?
hackthemap (2021-03-19 14:26:52+00:00): Referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885114614
ironspock (2021-03-19 16:31:10+00:00): Hi hackthemap,
I've checked my taken photos and have modified the nodes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27197721 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885114614 according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland. Whether the traffic sign is meanigful or not that's other question.
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:52:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95877187
rekklamy (2020-12-15 12:53:51+00:00): Hi Zoe,

please don't tag blocks like this with landuse=residential. Nevertheless you've traced much better than the buildings to the very left from this changeset.

A good way to learn OSM is first mapping your local (US) backyard before venturing out to Africa.

Kind regards,

Paul
kapazao (2020-12-15 12:51:52+00:00): Hola, hasta que no esté abierta la circunvalación no se debe poner como tal ni se deberían poner tramos abiertos.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95877354
PT-53 (2021-03-25 14:13:16+00:00): Hallo  gilbert Aeschelmann,
Du hast an dieser Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831789420/history
das Merkmal
oneway=yes 
gelöscht, das Merkmal
lanes=1
aber belassen.
Das paßt so nicht zusammen. Was ist richtig ?
Fragende Grüße
q_un_go (2021-03-29 10:43:02+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/rAHtzB99uXUZxJQIdnA52Z
Hab das am Samstag erkundet und die Lanes nun auch auf 2 korrigiert
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:51:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Sometimes your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared (21)
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95877620
aachso (2020-12-15 23:46:05+00:00): Hallo AeroKruemel und willkommen bei OSM!

Die Gebäude sehen noch ein bisschen "krumm" aus. Wenn du im Editor die Taste Q drückst, werden daraus rechtwinklige Rechtecke. Magst du das noch machen?

Der Rest passt! Grüße
AeroKruemel (2020-12-16 09:03:57+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ist erledigt.
Viele Grüße
Max-Kritic (2020-12-15 14:35:21+00:00): Je repassais pour mes erreurs. Trop tard
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:49:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95877914
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:48:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95878111
aachso (2020-12-15 23:50:51+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier aus der Wiese https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355534311 ein Gebäude gemacht. Das war sicher nicht beabsichtigt, oder? Aus diesem Grund hat der Editor dir auch die Warnung angezeigt, dass ein Weg das Gebäude durchkreuzt.

Ist es richtig, dass aus der Baustelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530610191 ein Acker geworden ist? Wurde dort ein Acker gebaut?

Gruß
AeroKruemel (2020-12-16 09:11:47+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Die Tankstelle steht bereits, aber ich kenne die Daten der Gebäude noch nicht. Habe jetzt die Fläche als Tankstelle markiert.
Die zweite Fläche war noch nie eine Baustelle, sondern bisher immer Acker. Dieses Jahr war es teilweise ungenutzt und nur Wiese bzw Weide. Aber eine Baustelle ist hier seit 25 Jahren nicht mehr gewesen.
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:47:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. Please map buildings individually. do not cluster buildings.
Also try to avoid that nodes of buildings connect to other features like highways.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95878372
Frans S (2020-12-16 13:18:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Experenced mappers, validators, review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95879068
Goffredo (2020-12-15 20:22:43+00:00): Hello Radicor48,
welcome in OSM!
I noticed this edit, Your first, and i see that You turned a bus stop into a cafe.... Maybe Your intention was only to insert the cafe?
Viki_travel_weak (2020-12-21 22:33:30+00:00): Hello! I found an error, the relation( r12024195 ) should not have a highway tag, because this will display the whole farmland polygon as a road. So sorry, I fixed it. Thank you for your attention!
eginhard (2021-10-26 15:19:10+00:00): Hi pherjung, thanks for your contributions to OSM!

You have tagged several roads as not having sidewalks here and then also answered that the roads are not accessible for pedestrians. This impacts pedestrian routing, leading to long detours like this: https://www.osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=46.60678%2C6.52289%3B46.60696%2C6.52527

From what I can see on the satellite image, sidewalks actually exist in most cases. Why did you answer the opposite? If only part of a road doesn't have a sidewalk, StreetComplete allows you to split the road and answer separately for each part when you click on "Other answers".

Best,
eginhard
pherjung (2021-10-26 15:25:50+00:00): Hi,
It's possible I did some errors as I started to contribute to OSM and use StreetComplete in English (not my mother language).
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:44:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
See my previous message as well. Please do not include multiple buildings in 1 mapping. Map each building individually 
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95879458
eggie (2022-09-08 07:31:53+00:00): Dag Rubenke.. Ik heb de situatie van na de reconstructie van afgelopen jaar aangepast. De wereld verandert wel eens. Hekken verplaatst en Prorail opslagterrein verwijderd. 
Hekken en loop wegen aangepast.
Op de 'omstreden' service heb ik een fixme gezet en even in een track omgezet. 

MVG
eggie
Dino Michelini (2021-01-10 19:36:11+00:00): non si tratta di una ciclovia ma di un path (leggi la wiki); inoltre, non capisco il senso di oneway=yes che si utilizza solo per la circolazione stradale (codice della strada). Per favore correggi. Grazie
AndersAndersson (2020-12-15 20:45:38+00:00): Why did you remove source=survey from Sörviks Folkets Hus?
It was surveyed by me. Is the source changed?
As the Wiki states "don't go around deleting those source tags indiscriminately."
johantiden (2020-12-16 08:32:14+00:00): I interpret the source (without namespaces) to mean all tags. When I added the community_centre tag, I didn't base that on survey but on common sense. 

For me it was easier to remove the tag and let future users look at the history instead if they need to know.
hackthemap (2021-03-19 14:35:12+00:00): There are a lot of bin=separate tags on the benches you added but I can't see a separate bin mapped besides it.
Also, more importantly, this tag is not documented in the wiki, only yes and no are allowed values, others will likely not be interpreted by data consumers and can't be assumed to have a clear definition as everyone will use them as they like without the existence of a clear accepted proposal in the wiki.
Therefore, these undocumented tags don't add much value and bin=yes would add a lot more value (it es even allowed to map the bin separately and still tag it as bin=yes if that was what you wanted to achieve!).
ironspock (2021-03-19 16:48:14+00:00): It is obiously a misunderstanding from my part and I'll take care
hackthemap (2021-03-29 07:17:54+00:00): Thanks a lot and sorry if I sounded impolite! 😊
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:42:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please use the correct imagery, See the instructions
Also square each building you map.
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95879798
Nakaner (2020-12-16 09:44:40+00:00): Hallo,

welche Landkarte diente für diesen Änderungssatz als Quelle?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95880073
Joachim Weiß (2020-12-16 11:33:54+00:00): Hi Michael,
ich habe die Freizeitkarte F516 vom LGL Baden-Württemberg verwendet. 
Viele Grüße
Joachim
Frans S (2020-12-16 13:04:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Experenced mappers, validators, review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95880087
Nielkrokodil (2020-12-15 19:54:29+00:00): Hallo,
ich war vor wenigen Tagen vor Ort, um die Furt (damals noch als Brücke eingetragen) zu überprüfen. Du hast jetzt auf diesen sechs highways access=private gesetzt, was auch Fußgänger miteinschließt (anders als "vehicle=private", was nur auf Fahrzeuge abzielt. 
Bei den zwei westlichen Wegen bin ich vorbeigegangen und dort ist mir kein Schild aufgefallen, das den Durchgang / das Betreten verboten hätte (anders als bissl weiter westlich bei Nr. 9, dort gibt es so ein Schild), sondern nur Fahrverbots-Schilder. 

--> aus meiner Sicht ist deine Änderung nicht zutreffend. Bitte um Erklärung, warum du das so gemacht hast. 
--
Deine Änderung von service=alley auf service=driveway ist ok glaub ich.
gnlpfth (2020-12-16 19:06:35+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Kommentar. Ich nehme das access=private für nicht öffentliche Erschließungswege hinzu, um Routing über Privatwege zu unterbinden. Mein Besuch war zugegeben schon länger her, da deine Erinnerungen präziser sind, habe ich den Weg wieder freigegeben (bei den Sackgassen macht es keinen Unterschied)
Nielkrokodil (2020-12-17 18:52:56+00:00): Wunderbar, danke!
Cartographer10 (2020-12-15 13:46:40+00:00): Bedankt voor de correctie. 1 opmerking. Je had twee totaal verschillende objecten (natural=water en water=drain aan de landuse=farmland vastgemaakt). In de JOSM editor krijg je dan de error: "gedupliceerde knopen van gemengde typen". Dat heb ik in onderstaande changeset even gecorrigeerd. Is het zelfde als dat je een hoogspanningslijn aan een rivier zou vast maken. Dat gaat niet.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95880151
Walter-NL (2020-12-17 09:37:59+00:00): Dank; helder verhaal. Logisch dat "hybride vastmaken" foutief is. ID waarschuwt daar niet voor. Toch maar vaker naar josm helaas.  
Op de een of andere manier heb ik je commentaar gemist, waarschijnlijk omdat je het aan je eigen changeset hebt gehangen in plaats van de mijne waarin de fout is gemaakt?
Cartographer10 (2020-12-17 09:44:55+00:00): Ik krijg altijd emails als iemand op mijn changeset reageeerd. Misschien heb je die gemist. 

Ik vind JOSM veel fijner werken. Het is in het begin mss even wennen maar ik kan er sneller en nauwkeuriger mee tekenen. Kijk maar eens op onderstaande forum post. Daar heeft Allroads een .jos bestand gedeeld met standaard de lagen die wij als referentie mogen gebruiken. Denk bijvoorbeeld aan de PDOK luchtfoto's en de BGT (die ik beide erg veel gebruik). Als je toestemming vraagt aan ESRI (zie post) dan mag je ook hun hoogtemodellen gebruiken als referentie voor het mappen. Als je JOSM start dan open je gewoon dat bestand en vervolgens download je het gebied wat je wilt bewerken. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Walter-NL (2020-12-17 21:15:54+00:00): De winter is een mooie tijd om eea uit te zoeken zoals de relatie discussion/changeset n(hoe werkt het) en JOSM, vooral omdat je met ID in fietspaden ongewild en ongemerkt de relatie met fietsroutes verstoort. Daar worden medemappers verdrietig van en ik als fietser ook. werk intensief met satellietportaal.nl als referentie en voor het overzicht maar ga vrijwel altijd ter plekke kijken:verkeersborden, begroeiing etc. Op de luchtfoto kan een watergang een optisch zo relevant item lijken dat je er een polygon van maakt terwijl in het veld de standaard lijn voor ditch prima past. Ook Boer&Bunder is een uitstekende referentie, maar toch even in het veld verkennen. Actief gebruik van BAG, BTG en BRT ligt boven mijn ambitieniveau, laat staan dat data zou importeren. Controlemechanismen zoals overpass-api, Osmose en nandere staan nog op mijn lijstje. Ik zag in jouw link n.a.v. de changeset duidelijk de oude en nieuwe situatie. 
Maar het is veel leerwerk op de oude dag ;-)
Cartographer10 (2020-12-18 07:32:11+00:00): JOSM heeft inderdaad beter validatie voor het vinden van fouten. Maar ik doe ook nog veel veldwerk. Ik kijk dan eerst hoe het er in het echt is en vervolgens gebruik ik de luchtfoto's en de BGT om het nauwkeurig in JOSM in te tekenen. Het is dus niet dat ik data van de BGT fysiek importeer. Ik teken het over. In jou geval zou je de BGT kunnen gebruiken om de locaties en afmetingen van de sloten etc beter in te tekenen. Het is inderdaad even wat leerwerk maar de verschillende tools brengen de kwaliteit van je edits naar een hoger niveau.
Walter-NL (2020-12-18 19:32:24+00:00): Ik heb de nodige info en tips uit je berichten apart gezet als leeswijzer voor de winterdagen. Vervelen hoeven we ons niet!  Dank en goed weekend.
Frans S (2020-12-15 15:41:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
one building is mapped oversized. Just a square. The building is more complex. Please map more precise.
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95880171