piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-19 23:59:05+00:00): This CS was fully reverted in 99621725
where the comment is:
US: revert graffti/vandalism from CS 94712787 94367853 94315606 
DWG Ticket #202102191000019994307928
muralito (2020-11-18 03:21:56+00:00): Hi.

What is the source for this changeset and all your recent changes that add foot=no to ways?

Are you able to see this fact by looking at aerial imagery (source tag of the changesets)?
yjn3n (2020-11-18 18:28:01+00:00): I was using a combination of Maxar/Bing/Esri imagery as a source. These edits were meant to discourage pedestrians making dangerous/unnecessary decisions to walk on this roundabout. It is high speed with no apparent traffic lights and seems  incautious for pedestrians to cross at that location.
muralito (2020-11-20 23:38:21+00:00): This is not the use case documented in the wiki for foot=no.

For discourage access maybe you can use 
foot=discouraged or something like that, but foot=no means that a pedestrian have no right to walk there, which in no way is the case in the changesets i was refering to.

Please fix them.

Thanks.
yjn3n (2020-11-23 18:23:52+00:00): Thank you for your input. I will heed your advice on this matter and will make changes immediately.
eggie (2020-11-18 08:24:13+00:00): Dag Bun.. Goed om zaken toe te voegen.
Tip...  Het is niet nodig om de natural=water als vlak te verwijderen en deze dan te vervangen door een waterway=streaam.. het is .. en... en...
De waterway kan gewoon in het vlak van de natural=water liggen.
De waterway is dan inderdaad de naamdrager van de beek. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-18 11:40:42+00:00): Ook hier ga je de eilandjes met scrub niet zien als je ze niet opneemt in een nieuw outermultipolygoon van het water.
Is dat waarom je om een review vraagt?

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-18 11:45:36+00:00): Als voorbeeld even dat eilandje zichtbaar gemaakt links van adres nr 19A.
Dus het water in de grote mp opgenomen als innner .. en dan op het water een nieuw outermp maken waar je dat stukje scrub weer als inner invoegt.
Ten noorden van huisnummer 19A krijg je alleen maar foutmeldingen. Die eilandjes hore innner te zijn in een outer van het water. 
Kun je er wat mee?
gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-18 11:47:01+00:00): Nu zie je in het zuidelijke stukje keurig het eilandje renderen. Het is de inner van de outer van het watervlak.
MatthieuGD (2020-11-19 21:19:00+00:00): Bonjour Julie et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

Un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Ma messagerie est ouverte également si besoin.

Matthieu

PS : Deux liens souvent utiles : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
eggie (2020-11-18 11:49:20+00:00): Dit ga je dus alleen maar zien als je het inner maakt in een nieuwe mp die je op de outer multipolygoon van het water maakt.
Het zal anders niet zichtbaar worden
Selecteer het water en maak een nieuwe mp. Voeg daarna aan de mp water het eilandje toe als inner.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-18 14:55:39+00:00): Dag Zandlopertjes,
De fouten heb ik even zelf aangepakt. Er zaten hier zoveel fouten.. Water op landuse... verkeerde inners en outers in de mp's 
Hier wat leesvoer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples

Ik zag dat je nog nooit hebt gereageerd op opmerkingen van medemappers die geprobeerd hebben om te helpen.
Reageren wordt wel op prijs gesteld.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-18 14:58:38+00:00): Maar wellicht heb je alleen middels PB gereageerd. Dat zou kunnen.
gr eggie
Zandlopertje (2020-11-18 17:23:59+00:00): IK reageer meestal via PB. 
De mp met outer en inner is nieuw voor mij, daarom had ik ook gevraagd om het te controleren. Ik had al wel een stukje gelezen over multipolygonen, maar hoe je dat dan in JOSM kan zien in welke vensters je wat moet zien ontbreekt.Heb ook een oud youtube filmpje bekeken, maar daar is dan geen geluid bij.
Ik kan nu dus alleen zien hoe jij deze relatie hebt gemaakt.
Gr. Sjaak
eggie (2020-11-18 17:40:02+00:00): Sjaak.. Ik kan die mp met dat eilandje even ongedaan  maken als je wilt? Dan kun je het zelf proberen. 
Zeg het maar.

eggie

je eigen edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94309413
Paavobave (2020-11-17 21:40:59+00:00): Lahti, not Vihti*
RicoElectrico (2020-11-17 23:11:59+00:00): Zmieniłem building:part=yes na building=yes. Zobacz jak teraz będzie.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-11-18 09:34:00+00:00): Ciao, l'etichetta place=hamlet (centro abitato con pochi abitanti ma senza o con pochi servizi, ad esempio un piccolo negozio o una chiesa) su "Alpe Corteis" mi sembra errata. E' più facile sia un place=farm, nel caso la località fosse abitata stabilmente tutto l'hanno o un place=locality in caso contrario. Ciao, Andrea
popilen (2020-11-18 23:21:21+00:00): Ciao Andrea, la mia modifica odierna all'alpe Corteis ha riguardato l'inserimento di alcuni sedimi e lo spostamento del toponimo in posizione baricentrica ai sedimi.
L'etichetta "hamlet" attribuita al luogo, come si può evincere dalla cronologia, è una eredità di Nuvola Bianca che evidentemente non ho notato, stante che ogni volta che incontro quella etichetta in un alpeggio da tempo la modifico in locality
L'etichetta place=farm negli alpeggi valsesiani è impropria poiché nessun alpeggio è abitato tutto l'anno
popilen (2020-11-18 23:25:07+00:00): Ora per l'alpeggio citato ho modificato hamlet in locality
Tilia_J (2020-11-18 11:10:09+00:00): A few weeks ago I drove by and the path is clearly visible. In this case I would have set the access of the path to "no" instead of removing it.
IByte (2020-11-18 11:57:16+00:00): I could add a "barrier=log" in several places, but I don't think that makes it as clear that this path is now quite impassable, for bicycles at least.
Tilia_J (2020-11-18 20:24:32+00:00): Tags "access = no" and "barrier=log" are sufficient for making this clear.

The result of this is that routeplanners calculate an alternative route, and in the map rendering the inaccessability is displayed as abrown-pinkish dotted line (just as can be seen north of the "Nieuwe Zuidweg"
IByte (2020-11-19 19:50:59+00:00): Well, I can enter it that way, at least that's visible on the map. Barrier=log isn't always very visible, for instance the current version of OsmAnd doesn't render it. By the way, it does look to me like some forester is trying to close off this path (see the linked photos), so it might be getting a little close to mapping historical features (which you know OSM doesn't do).

See https://postimg.cc/gallery/FNK9ypy

(And thanks for your many edits to the area, by the way.)
Tilia_J (2020-11-19 20:24:42+00:00): Thanks for the extra info and photos. I still see a "vrije wandeling op wegen en paden" sign and the dark, flattened leaves on the path tell me it is still often used by people.

I feel only inclined to completely remove paths after a couple of years, when it starts to overgrow.

The current situation could only be sloppy forestry maintenance instead of a deliberate path closure by the owner.

I even consider many path closures illegal.
IByte (2020-11-26 19:01:41+00:00): Heh, this path has been reopened, it appears it was indeed forest maintenance in progress. I edited the map accordingly. (I've seen paths be closed like this before, though.)
santamariense (2021-02-10 22:51:07+00:00): Olá diogo 7,
Percebi que modificou a classificação viária que chega à cidade de Paranaguá. Existem regras de mapeamento de classificação viária que devem ser seguidos para que tenhamos um mapa mais harmônico. O problema maior neste caso foi elevar esta via [1] para motorway. Para querer pensar em considerar uma via motorway ela tem que no mínimo ser duplicada com canteiro central entre as vias em cada direção. A parte desta rodovia com pista simples, foi corrigida de volta para primary.
[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135921656/history
Frans S (2020-11-29 10:14:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks fro mapping here
A remark. Please map each building individually. do not cluster buildings.
Thanks and keep mapping
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-12 16:52:57+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11905576

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
dentonny (2021-02-09 05:58:11+00:00): Beste,

Het lijkt mij dat u bij het toevoegen van de straatlampen enkel en alleen bent afgegaan op de gegevens die op de kaart van AIV Vlaanderen GRB staan. Op de Janssen-Pharmaceuticalaan heb je aan de Noordzijde de punten die op AIV staan, aangeduid als straatlamp. Als je echt op survey bent geweest zoals je zelf hebt aangegeven, dan had je moeten zien dat dit elektriciteitspalen zijn en geen straatlampen.
Net zoals op het kruispunt met Oosterloseweg. Daar heb je de verkeerslichten aangeduid als straatlampen.
Je kan niet alles zo maar overnemen wat er op de AIV Vlaanderen kaart staat zonder het zelf te controleren.
GR-menneke (2021-02-10 23:36:05+00:00): Dag Tonny,

Ik dacht dat deze items straatlampen waren, ik heb namelijk deze koppeling gelegd op basis van mijn vaststellingen te Stelen-centrum.

Zijn er nu zaken die u van mijnentwege verwacht?

Met vriendelijke groeten,

GR-menneke
dentonny (2021-03-19 18:20:28+00:00): Als u daadwerkelijk in Stelen bent geweest dan had u toch moeten zien dat dit geen straatlampen waren maar elektriciteitspalen? 
Net als de verkeerslichten op het kruispunt.

Die elektriciteitspalen daarvan kan je de tag veranderen. 
Die foutieve verkeerslichten zou ik verwijderen aangezien het verkeerslicht tag al op de kruising van het kruispunt staat
GR-menneke (2021-03-20 23:30:47+00:00): Beste Tonny,

Ik heb de boodschap begrepen, ik wens de mappers van OSM veel succes.

MVG,

GR-menneke
Stinus_Clasius (2021-03-21 10:00:31+00:00): Dag GR-menneke,

Alle hulp aan OSM is welkom. Je begrijpt dat er natuurlijk gewaakt moet worden over de kwaliteit van de data. Bekijk de (ietwat hard) geformuleerde van Tonny dan ook vooral vanuit zijn bezorgdheid om zo min mogelijk fouten in OSM te krijgen. Input van op terrein is zeker meer dan welkom en ik heb een sterk vermoeden dat jij wel degelijk over die terreinkennis beschikt. Nu alleen nog kijken dat die goed omgezet wordt in objecten op de kaart! Kijk zeker eens naar https://openstreetmap.be/nl/contact.html voor de verschillende kanalen om vragen te stellen als je twijfels hebt hoe je bepaalde zaken dient te karteren! Dat traject hebben ook de wat meer ervaren mappers in OSM moeten doorlopen ;-)
syntex (2020-11-21 16:23:46+00:00): You have deleted the label node from Nagorno-Karabakh relation. Why?
NFZANMNIM (2020-11-21 18:55:21+00:00): OH, ummm I guessed it's not necessary and that the name will show up automatically, instead of at the label node.
mueschel (2020-11-19 11:32:19+00:00): Something went wrong with this import.

- you removed tags from existing objects, e.g. building=yes

- you created many new / misspelled tags like these:
contact_ph = 7.75590354E8
electricit 	= Power grid
emergency = Yes
health_ame = Birthing center
insurance_ = None
latitude = 13.723432
longitude = -13.668249
opening_ho = 24/7 - All day, every day
operationa =Operational
staff_co_1 = 0
water_sour = Groundwater


Please fix all the issues. I'd recommend to revert this import completely and redoing it in a clean and proper way.
woodpeck (2020-12-03 20:19:21+00:00): Why have you removed a legitimate name:en tag in this changeset? Please be more careful when applying the reverter plugin.
user_5359 (2020-11-19 05:32:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question about your entry: You have entered many named object with a hashtag. Is this really the name of the object or "only" a label for your action?
SuperFlomm (2020-11-18 00:19:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ref
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-19 23:59:14+00:00): This CS was fully reverted in 99621725
where the comment is:
US: revert graffti/vandalism from CS 94712787 94367853 94315606 
DWG Ticket #202102191000019994307928
Myazyk (2020-12-11 18:36:52+00:00): Оксано, я всі дороги наніс правильно, вирівняв лінії доріг, а ти це все поламала, поробила чудеса!
Ти помиляєшся щодо "підкореговано проходження доріг". Натисни інші підложки зі знімками супутників і побачиш як твоя дорога буде зміщена відносно різних знімків.
І ще: перестань малювати криві хати гігантських розмірів - треба ноносити по краях будівлі лінії і вирівнювати за допомогою значка "вирівняти кути"
Frans S (2020-12-12 11:15:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. Default tagging for buildings on HOTOSM is building=yes
Not other taggings.
Best regards
look here for more info how to map and to improve the mappings 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
abakus_uploader (2020-11-18 23:33:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
خرائط دبي (2020-11-27 16:39:59+00:00): Are you crazy man? Why did you edit my changes that were correct in Ulisses Guimarães?
خرائط دبي (2020-11-27 16:43:10+00:00): Is that just to appear as the last editor? A lot of self-centeredness on your part!
Frans S (2020-12-09 11:32:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please do not tag a local track to a riverside as a Secondary highway (used to connect towns.)
Best regards
Friendly_Ghost (2023-08-20 20:42:51+00:00): Hi. What source do you have for the name of this island?
BCNorwich (2020-11-19 11:54:34+00:00): Hi. It looks like you've got both lines of steps joined at each end to paths at level 0, 1 and two. Can you really go up one flight of steps onto paths on 3 separate levels? Doesn't seem logical.

Regards Bernard.
Sythelux (2020-11-19 14:47:25+00:00): There are 3 lines on top of each other. each on a different level
(#873309625, #873324674, #873309623)
I connected the line nodes, because they are on top of each other IRL. It is NOT a spiral going up three levels, though. So i suppose I did it wrong.
Sythelux (2020-11-19 14:49:44+00:00): osminedit renders it correctly: https://osminedit.pavie.info/#19/55.84449/-4.42494/0
BCNorwich (2020-11-19 15:11:16+00:00): Hi, I'm sorry but it's not rendered properly on osminedit. It renders with the steps greyed out on levels 0,1 and 2. It needs to be mapped with all 3 levels of steps drawn and then each line of steps joining to one path level, rising up to join the above path level at the other end. The differing path levels must not be joined but be a separate way directly on top of (or under) the other ways. The map is rendered from birds eye view. As it is now if you can imagine tilting the building all the ways will be joined together. It should be drawn such that when imagining a  tilted building, the paths are all separate with the steps going from one level of path to another level of path.

I hope that makes sense. Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-12-07 09:24:41+00:00): Hello Sythelux, 

The steps and footways are still not correct although they may appear correct to you. Can you tell me which way each set of steps slope please? Is the right eastwards end of the steps the high end and is this the same for both sets of steps? 

Many Thanks, Bernard.
Sythelux (2020-12-07 11:47:24+00:00): Ok, so you have 3 hexagonal ways on each level. each level is connected with 2 escalators to each other level, making it 4 escalators in total. The north escalators are going up from west to east and the south escalators are going down from east to west. The first escalator on the north connects level 0 with level 1 and the second one on the north connects level 1 to level 2 and they are stacked on top of each other as typical for escalators in malls. the same for the south escalators. If you want to go from bottom to top level you have to go to far west, then ride up, then walk around the way from east to west and ride up again I can try to provide you a picture taken from top level, if you want.
abrensch (2021-04-10 14:06:54+00:00): Hi asnghpi,

I removed your "barrier=gate" from K 7253

What feature did you want to add to the map?

If it's the railway-crossing please learn the correct tagging:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dcrossing

If it's a gate to a private property, it must not be placed on the highway. The way you did it blocked the highway.

regards, Arndt
skyper (2021-04-10 16:00:43+00:00): Ebenfalls Hallo.

Kann mir bitte jemand sagen wann dieser CS überprüft worden ist ? Warum wird so ein Problem nicht erkannt?

Wenn es sich beim Begutachtenden nicht um einen Menschen handelt, teile mir bitte mit, ab wann damit rechnen kann, dass solche Fehler entdeckt und korrigiert werden. Über eine regelmäßige Information über den Fortschritt und einer endgültigen Benachrichtigung, wenn das Problem der Überprüfung behoben ist, würde ich mich freuen. Vielen Dank im Voraus.

Grüße skyper
PT-53 (2021-04-10 16:31:28+00:00): Hallo skyper,
an wen sind diese Vorwürfe und Fragen denn gerichtet ?
Grüße
skyper (2021-04-11 12:31:28+00:00): Hey PT-53
Na, ich denke allen Angestellten von Amazon dürfte ja wohl ihre eigene Wikiseite (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_Logistics#Editing_process) und die mittlerweile schön versteckte Diskussion (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Amazon_Logistics) bekannt sein. Wenn eine Person meine Fragen nicht beantworten kann oder ist es doch normal, dass sich diese Information beschafft wird oder die Frage weitergeleitet wird. Einfach ein Tor in eine Kreisstraße zu platzieren ohne auf die Folgen zu achten kann es ja wohl nicht das Gelbe von Ei sein.
Viel Grüße, skyper
PT-53 (2021-04-11 13:31:38+00:00): Hallo skyper,
was Amazon betrifft, hast Du sicher recht. Ich habe das aber so verstanden, daß Dein Vorwurf an "alle" Mapper gerichtet war u.a. auch an abrensch, der den Fehler ja gefunden und behoben hat.
Grüße
skyper (2021-04-11 14:11:59+00:00): Salut
Nee, sicher nicht, tut mir Leid wenn der Eindruck entstanden ist. Muss wohl noch an meiner Formulierung arbeiten.

@abrensch: Danke für das auffinden, -zeigen und korrigieren.

@asnghpi: Die Fragen können gerne auch von einer Person in der Hierarchieleiter weiter oben beantwortet werden. Danke.

Grüße skyper
ravsjith (2021-04-12 11:56:15+00:00): Hi Skyper,

This is a complete mistake by our editor, he added gate based on bing satellite imagery where there is small line like structure. Editor have made these edit on his own and not under the programs we run. So, it didn't went to review pipeline. We have given all the necessary feedback to editor and ensure this will not happen again. Sincere apologies on behalf of our editor. Once again, thanks for your feedback 

regards,
ravsjith
skyper (2021-04-12 14:54:53+00:00): Hallo ravsjith und asnghpi

Könnt Ihr mir bitte erklären wie eine gute Kommunikation funktionieren soll, wenn hier die handelnde Person nicht mal Stellung bezieht sondern es weiter delegiert.
Ich habe Euch schon vor über einem halben Jahr mitgeteilt, dass es nicht gut ist private Änderungen und die für die Firma zu vermischen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Amazon_Logistics#Private_edits). Warum darüber einfach hinweggegangen wird darf mir gerne erklärt werden. Bitte verwendet ab sofort dafür zwei unterschiedliche Accounts.

Wieso sollte ich Euch glauben?

Abgesehen davon habe ich die Frage ob solch ein Fehler von Eurem Review-System gefunden wird. Habt ihr es überprüft?

Freue mich über eine ausführliche meiner Fragen auch derer die seit über einem halben Jahr auf Antwort warten.

Ciao skyper
ravsjith (2021-04-15 12:56:14+00:00): Hi Spyker,

Sorry, there were couple of mis-communications happened earlier. We were in an impression, you are requesting the supervisor to respond to the comment instead of the editor hence I responded personally. All this communication is being made post discussion with the editor and happy to have him answering your queries going forward. We clearly stated our editors not to mix any of their personal edits with public edits but he missed it from his end. We have warned him not to make such errors again and have walked him through the OSM wiki’s once again for his reference.

As communicated earlier, since it was not a suggestion through our editing process and the edit was made by the editor on his own, it didn’t get reviewed. Going forward we will make sure to avoid such private edits coming through our process. We will roll out an update to our entire editing team not to make such edits in OSM unless we have a proper evidence on ground. Hope this helps and answers your questions.

Regards,
ravsjith
skyper (2021-04-22 12:02:46+00:00): Hallo ravsjith
Du behauptest hier, dass Eure Meinung zur Vermischung von privaten und Änderungen als Person einer Organisation sich geändert hat. Warum steht das nicht auf der oben genannten Diskussionsseite oder gar deutlich im Wiki? Wann hat sich Eure Meinung geändert und wie und wann wurde sie an die Beschäftigen mitgeteilt?

@asnghpi:
Hallo asnghpi.
Du darfst Dich gerne auch an der Diskussion beteiligen und Deine Standpunkte darlegen. Würde Dir wirklich klipp und klar gesagt, dass Du private Änderungen unter einem eigenen Account machen sollst. Wann war das?

Ciao skyper
ErraticThunder (2021-04-23 12:50:07+00:00): Hi,
My supervisor is on leave, I will respond to this. First of all let me apologize for this irresponsible edit. We are trained to avoid mix up of personal edits/and corporate edits, all my colleagues use their personal IDs to contribute to OSM in their personal capacity. We were also warned not to edit outside of our geography unless we have local knowledge. I must have followed the same, but I misjudged and edited it from my office account. I mistook black line in bing satellite imagery with gate, added it. As soon as we heard from the community, my supervisor connected with me and explained the error I have committed. I will make sure not to repeat this any further. Thanks for the feedback. 
Thanks
Dimacn (2020-11-18 05:35:29+00:00): Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM: В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Пожалуйста удалите текст из тега name, иначе все ваши изменения будут отменены.