piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
axc97c (2015-04-08 07:39:42+00:00): The bing data, my traces and the order external data I use all seemed to match up here. I would not have changed if I wasn't sure.
uolpleintslma (2016-10-06 12:52:17+00:00): ---
BeKri (2015-04-09 12:18:01+00:00): Tach Skywalker,
11= 13 a in  addr:city 	Reinting
ist ja korregiert,
macht es Sinn die anderen Hausnummern in
Reinting auch mit addr:place=	Reinting
umzusetzen ?
skywalker1 (2015-04-09 18:31:01+00:00): Ja, sicher. Kann ich machen.
Smiljan_02 (2015-07-04 12:23:42+00:00): Hallo, hier hast du im Jonastal ein highway=phat zusammen mit waterway=stream an der Wilden Weiße getagt.
Wird hier im Wasser gefahren ?

Senni
Tocosibirsk (2015-07-04 12:37:08+00:00): Servus!
Das Bachbett ist die meiste Zeit trocken (intermittent=yes) und wird dann deutlich sichtbar als Pfad genutzt. Hatte ne Note dazu offen, ob jemandem taggingmäßig was besseres einfällt. Tat es aber nicht: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/344033
Smiljan_02 (2015-07-04 12:48:39+00:00): Ah,gut ich verstehe.
Du siehst das Wasser nur nicht immer in Karstgebieten.
Ich habe trotzdem den layer=-1 entfernt.
Tocosibirsk (2015-07-04 13:39:37+00:00): is recht
user_5359 (2018-08-04 14:39:38+00:00): Hello, short question to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3443638986 : Is the key payment:credit_cardsdd a typo? If not what is the meaning of this key?
Jack the Ripper (2018-08-04 15:31:54+00:00): Hi. It must be a typo, because I don't know of a key named that. I'll fix it the next time I'm at a computer. Thanks for catching it.
Jack the Ripper (2018-08-04 22:10:07+00:00): Fixed.  Thanks.
Natalia Clemente (2015-04-10 21:07:25+00:00): Escuela Almafuerte y Capilla San Antonio y San Grato - Colonia Freyre Noroeste
robbieonsea (2015-04-09 18:49:32+00:00): If it no longer usable as a telephone, then it's better tagged as 'disused:amenity'.

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused: for object life-cycle concepts.
ViriatoLusitano (2015-04-08 07:32:47+00:00): Olá Bruno, o que é que estás a tentar mapear aqui?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-08 01:14:43+00:00): Przy rondach nie łączymy zjazdów z wjazdami, bo potem nawigacje źle numerują zjazdy. Poprawiłem.
morris84 (2015-04-08 23:32:10+00:00): ok, zapamiętam, dziękuję
jumbanho (2015-06-29 14:23:41+00:00): Given your other edits, is it safe to assume that this isn't real?
SomeoneElse (2015-06-12 19:17:59+00:00): Hi, rather than adding "example" data to OSM you might find it helpful to use the "dev" server http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ .  It's a separate login, but once you're in the editing process is exactly the same as the normal server, apart from tile rendering.
jumbanho (2015-06-29 14:22:12+00:00): I think this should either be reverted or the single way should be deleted.  It's nonsense.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-30 09:05:19+00:00): @djberghoff - thanks for removing it.
Setti (2015-12-17 21:13:46+00:00): Hey b-ghost, looks as if something went wrong with changeset 30053140. JOSM tells me that a lot of highways and buildings are duplicates with the other changeset. Do you want to fix it? What happened?
Cheers Sebastian
muralito (2016-10-28 18:56:40+00:00): Este par de nombres de INE estan mal.
naoliv (2015-04-08 03:26:38+00:00): 0573MF, você apagou alguns caminhos que estavam corretos, além de deixar alguns trechos sem conexão agora.
Por favor, evite apagar objetos do mapa. Também procure deixar sempre as ruas conectadas umas com as outras.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2015-04-08 05:13:41+00:00): naoliv vai ter que ser feita uma reversão aqui, ele apagou balões que realmente existem.
naoliv (2015-04-08 14:13:11+00:00): Vou arrumar isso.
naoliv (2015-04-10 13:58:32+00:00): Restaurado.
naoliv (2015-04-08 11:31:02+00:00): 0573MF, novamente, não apague os objetos existentes no mapa.
Você quebrou a divisão entre Sobradinho e Planaltina.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2015-04-09 17:56:41+00:00): Foi revertido aqui: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30083536
Xmypblu (2015-04-09 23:17:18+00:00): статусную часть в названии рек и ручьев ненужно писать, для этого достаточно проставить нужный тег:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить
и еще... поменьше удаляйте, даже если это что-то непонятное для вас - лучше спросить у автора "что это и зачем?", иначе ваши правки начнут откатывать как вандальные
HubMiner (2017-11-08 05:32:47+00:00): Hi, please take a look at: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/690960
GerdP (2015-11-10 10:53:44+00:00): please review the junction near
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1373874109
I am not a local, and maybe Bing is out-aged here, but
1) I see no direct way like that marked by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123114934
2) The link roads should be tagged 
highway=secondary_link, not residential_link
3) Also the two link roads
near https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1373874107 seem to be 
highway=secondary_link, not primary_link
(guess that was just overseen when the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123103585 was changed from primary to secondary
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 18:23:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233099400/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
mathieuS (2015-04-29 11:23:53+00:00): Hi,

I think node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3444352595 is a duplicate of way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286789693.
In other words, the place=isolated_dwelling should be merged with the landuse=farmyard way.

By the way, you should split your modifications into smaller chunks and comment them.

Good mapping !
Xmypblu (2015-04-09 23:26:37+00:00): прекратите удалять улицы
за вандализм в проекте банят
правку откатил
cerdo (2015-04-08 06:28:33+00:00): Cangeset description is false !

corrected:
untagged ways deleted
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 17:06:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104345592/history - would it be fine to mark just regular standard surface=asphalt ?
MelioraCogito (2023-04-02 00:13:50+00:00): Considering the date of my edit, does it really matter?
I can only surmise that I used a “user_defined” surface tag because it was described as such in the referenced NAVCan airport chart.
Furthermore, this would limit search results (exclude/include) for the specific tag, rather than resulting in a much larger selection of objects if only “asphalt” was used (though perhaps using “asphalt” alone might include the airport ramps/taxiways/runways without using an exclusion to “asphalt_” in the search parameters).
Having not been active on OSM for many years, you're free to use your discretion.
Cheers.
GerdP (2015-10-31 19:30:43+00:00): please review node 3444369211
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3444369211

It is tagged 
highway=living_street
junction=roundabout
lanes=2
I guess you wanted to change one of the roads?
dudka (2015-05-05 12:59:33+00:00): зачем удалил name?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3628093/history
iWowik (2015-05-05 14:10:51+00:00): Наверно от того, что там для границы еще есть отношение.
dudka (2015-05-05 14:32:24+00:00): нету больше ничего
iWowik (2015-05-05 17:33:00+00:00): Ну да, http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3628093
dudka (2015-05-06 07:30:05+00:00): а я на что ссылку дал?
dudka (2015-05-06 07:30:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30833237
сам исправил
iWowik (2015-05-06 11:23:15+00:00): Да, что-то зациклилось ;-)
iWowik (2015-05-06 11:25:34+00:00): Всё понял, я снимал с границы admin_level и похоже, что задел и name :-(
Xmypblu (2015-04-08 15:52:46+00:00): используйте хоткей "s" - для спрямления углов или переходите на редактор JOSM, там есть специальный плагин "BuildingsTools" для удобного рисования зданий.
Swen Wacker (2015-04-08 15:10:06+00:00): Hi,
Bei den von Dir gelöschten Gebieten handelt es sich um Exklaven der Gemeinden Hanstedt, Toppenstedt und Vierhöfen. 
Hat eine Gebietsbereinigung stattgefunden? Dann wäre ich für einen Link auf die Quelle dankbar. 
Ansonsten rege ich an, dass Du die Löschungen revertierst.

Gruß

Swen
EichholzFan (2015-04-08 19:23:26+00:00): Hey Swen, wäre lieb wenn du das revertieren könntest. Hab leider keine Ahnung wie der Revert gehen soll und das Netz gibt da auch nicht viel her... Danke udn liebe Grüße!
Swen Wacker (2015-04-09 07:15:19+00:00): Moin, die Grenzen wiederhergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30082992.
Sicher passiert es immer wieder mal, dass Grenzen "einfach so" in der Gegend rumliegen. Ein Anhaltspunkt, warum diese Grenzen sinnvoll waren/sind, ist deren Einbindung in Grenzrelationen. Ich rege an, vor solchen Löschungen erstmal in amtliche Karten zu schauen. Vielleicht hast Du auch mal Lust, (falls Du aus der Gegend kommst) hier http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/L%C3%BCneburg/Mappertreffen#OSM-Treffen_L.C3.BCneburg_und_Umgebung: vorbeizuschauen. Da kann man prima über solche Fragen diskutieren.

Gruß

Swen
fndoder (2015-04-11 21:29:28+00:00): "name=Памятник"
А что там за памятник в лесу?
teddyfox78 (2015-04-12 11:19:33+00:00): Там памятник красной армии, и это не совсем уж лес..  Не надо удалять то,  что сами не знаете, скачала побыввйте там,  поживите лет десять, а потом удаляйте, если конечно за десять лет так и не найдете памятник... 😧  не хотел быть грубым, но просто вы меня обижаете..
fndoder (2015-04-12 11:31:58+00:00): Наоборот, в данном случае я уточнил для поправки тегов точки, ничего не удалял.
Без правильных тегов она есть, но даже не рендерится на карте.

Добавил тег historic=memorial.

Пакет правок 30161194 - 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30161194

Кроме того, пара примечаний:
1) Я сам эти места ранее рисовал, в частности см. моё авторство тропинок к роднику со стороны реки Киндреки; но всё, конечно же, не запомнишь, поэтому и уточняю
2) Просьба нормально относиться к комментариям к правкам - никакого обижания тут ни в коем случае нет, наоборот, советы, как сделать лучше
teddyfox78 (2015-04-12 12:08:48+00:00): Вы - сама любезность. Спасибо. Все учту.
Loremo (2015-07-17 22:07:58+00:00): Kannst du mir dieses Changeset genauer erklären? Namen wie Tugstein, Rheinauer Feld, Zum Pflug etc sind Flurnamen und somit mit place=locality eigentlich richtig eingetragen. Es ist nicht so, dass genau diese Wiese oder jenes Feld so heisst.
Loremo (2015-08-09 19:39:28+00:00): Da zudem auch korrekte Daten gelöscht wurden, werde ich diese Änderung rückgängig machen.
Loremo (2015-08-09 19:48:45+00:00): Done in 33226099.
Loremo (2015-05-29 19:39:23+00:00): Hallo SingletrailMap

Gibt es einen Grund, wieso du Ellikon am Rheinau in Ellikon umbenennt hast? Node 102619758 in Changeset 30059694.

Gruss Loremo
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-04-09 16:10:04+00:00): Тут, похоже, правки лесов.
stephan75 (2015-09-03 15:34:06+00:00): Hallo Nicolaus,

in diesem changeset und weiteren aus April 2015 hast du zu ganz vielen Gebäuden in Welver die Hausnummern mittels addr:housenumber=xx eingetragen. Leider fehlen aber zu ganz vielen Objekten noch die addr:-Daten zu der entsprechenden Straße ...

Könntest du diese Daten für Welver und ggf. weitere Orte noch nachtragen? Das wäre super! 

Da du bei deinen Änderungen ja den JOSM-Editor benutzt hast, kann ich dir dazu den Mappaint-Stil "Coloured Streets" empfehlen, damit werden Straßen und die dazugehörenden Objekte mit addr: Daten farblich zusammen dargestellt ...

 siehe https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AStyles
mweper (2015-04-08 15:16:43+00:00): Hola Bertola71.
Vi que agregaste la escuela y los ingresos.
Recién estuve mejorando un poco, marcando correctamente las entradas y el edificio.
Por favor, dime si está bien.. Saludos
flohoff (2015-04-08 13:14:00+00:00): Hi,
wenn das wirklich einen Namen hat ist das tendentiell eigentlich keine Service Road. Wenn das eine öffentlich unterhaltene Straße ist sollte das unclassified oder residential sein.
letihu (2017-02-23 20:51:17+00:00): Hier ist vielleicht nur ein Hydrant richtig ;-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3444675921/history
oder
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3444678606/history
Xmypblu (2015-04-08 15:41:53+00:00): неуказан источник адресной информации.
судя по объему - это импорт, откуда он сделан?
SomeoneElse (2015-04-10 01:21:30+00:00): The edit here has removed the information that this church is high Anglican ("all bells and smells") rather than run-of-the-mill C of E or at the "happy clappy" end.  Are you sure that the previous tag was wrong?
Mathbau (2015-04-10 21:52:02+00:00): You are referring to a liturgical style (for which theres is no tag yet in OSM), not to a denomination. According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination churches belonging to the Anglican communion should be tagged "anglican".
SomeoneElse (2015-04-10 22:23:13+00:00): OSM doesn't have restrictive tagging - you can use any tag you like.  Regardless of what the wiki page author wrote, the Anglican church is a figuratively a very broad church (pun intended) with some members that aren't "in communion" with other members, so if a previous mapper thought that a particular tag was appropriate here you should respect that - or at the very least try and suggest an alternative that does not remove surveyed information from OSM (unless you've actually surveyed it yourself, of course).
SomeoneElse (2015-11-13 23:55:10+00:00): Are you sure that there is a duplicate footpath and road here?  It doesn't look like it from the imagery.
ruthmaben (2015-11-16 07:29:20+00:00): Thank you for highlighting this SomeoneElse. I have reverted the changes and connected the footway to the residential road as per the  imagery.
Janjko (2022-03-24 14:11:30+00:00): Hi. You mapped this pipeline 7 years ago, but I think you tried to map this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043456693

It has estimated geometry, so I'm wondering if the pipeline you mapped had more precise geometry, or if it is the same pipeline? If it is also estimated, I think we should delete it.

Thanks!
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-27 10:06:52+00:00): Hej, Ktoś chyba popsuł relację: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4767127
metatech (2015-04-11 20:47:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce que ce changement résulte d'une visite sur le terrain ?
Il y a quelques mois, ce tronçon de Ravel était en travaux pour égoûttage.
Avez-vous vu personnellement que les travaux étaient finis ?  Il n'y a pas de commentaire aux changements qui permettrait de l'établir...
Merci d'avance,
ratrun (2015-04-12 06:38:12+00:00): You seem to be directly loading GPX hiking data into the OSM database. This results in a lots of OSM data errors, because you created a lot over overlapping ways without connections to the rest of the map. 
Such data errors are displayed by the Open Streetmap Inspector tool and via this tool I detected your bogus edits: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=13.98541&lat=47.62452&zoom=8&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways,islands

The correct way of mapping GPX data is to use the GPS traces as background only and draw the individual missing way segments. Usually a lot of the way segments already exist. In case that you are creating a relation you can put all the segments of your route into the relation. I would ask you to rework the edits you made recently and don't uploadunmodified GPS traces again.
CAI Stabia (2015-04-15 13:41:20+00:00): Thank you for the comment. We are fairly new to the OSM editing and therefore any suggestion is very welcome .

Regarding the track indicated , it is fully loaded to be properly rendered in: http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/it/relation/4771065 and to be ready to be downloaded.

We do not know well OSM Inspector,  please can you show us how to display the errors? Josm didn't show us any error in the validation phase prior the uploading.
ratrun (2015-04-15 19:37:13+00:00): In the meantime I have fixed the indicated errors. I would ask you to take a look onto http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route for the purpose of a route relation. From your description I guess that you haven't yet fully understood the purpose of it. A route relation with just one element usually doesn't make much sense and if the new track overlaps with existing way segments then the is bad editing.
Please take a look onto http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2766147 for an example how a route relation is supposed to look like usually.

By the way, the waymarkedtrails tool is able to assemble the invidual way segments of a route relation with many elements into one GPX file. Thats actually the main purpose of this tool as far as I understood.

Please refer to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing?setlang=en for a description about the purpose of the OSMI routing view.

I was able to reproduce your observation about the missing JOSM upload validation warning. Thank you for reporting. I'm quite sure that this has worked in previous  JOSM versions. JOSM also does provide the respective validation check (it is called "crossing way" check), but due to some JOSM bug it doesn't work for the upload check. It works in case that you select the surrounding data and inititiate the JOSM validation manually. I plan to file a JOSM track bug report about your finding tomorrow.
Xmypblu (2015-04-08 16:00:16+00:00): из какого источника берете данные по адресам?
в iD есть горячая клавиша "s" - спрямляйте углы зданий или переходите на редактор JOSM + плагин BuildingsTools
kartler175 (2015-04-21 12:36:33+00:00): Bei Auteilung von Straßen beteiligte Abbiegebeschränkungen beachten!
Basstoelpel (2015-04-22 15:33:32+00:00): Sorry, ich dachte, ich würde sparse editing beherrschen. Wohl doch nicht. Hat das schon jemand behoben oder soll ich das selbst machen?
kartler175 (2015-04-25 13:02:06+00:00): Ist schon behoben! im CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30378231
JOSM-Validator hilft!
wille (2015-04-08 23:10:23+00:00): oi, Cesar

De acordo com o fluxograma ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/1/12/Br-classification-flowchart-pt.png ), se a via não tem canteiro central, tem que ser trunk e não motorway. É esse o caso do eixão, cujas pistas são separadas apenas por "olhos de gato".
cesarlanzoni (2015-04-09 11:20:27+00:00): Existe um canteiro central sim, uma faixa de aproximadamente 4 metros em asfalto.
https://urbanistasporbrasilia.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/994040_10151840334613393_1744201727_n.jpg
cesarlanzoni (2015-04-09 11:22:41+00:00): Comprovando o eixo central
http://imguol.com/c/noticias/2013/05/29/29mai2013---pessoas-fazem-caminhada-e-pedalam-no-eixao-norte-em-brasilia-na-musica-faroeste-caboclo-da-legiao-urbana-a-asa-norte-era-o-lugar-que-santo-cristo-frequentava-pra-se-libertar-1369868263331_956x500.jpg
cesarlanzoni (2015-04-09 11:25:38+00:00): Pelas fotos acima poderá ver que existe sim um canteiro central, além disso eu acho que os eixos L e W tem características de trunk, como o canteiro central, não ter cruzamento em nível e não ter semáforo, só que a velocidade é 60km/h
wille (2015-04-09 11:51:39+00:00): Geralmente a comunidade entende canteiro central como uma divisão física entre as vias. Acho que tem muitas vias em Brasília com classificação acima do que deveria. Vou convidar outros mapeadores daqui pra opinar sobre essa questão. Recomendo que, antes de alterar a classificação de vias, consulte a comunidade.
Linhares (2015-04-11 21:38:42+00:00): César, eu concordo com o Wille sobre a falta de canteiro. Já aconteceu algumas vezes acidentes com motoristas que cruzam a pista. Numa motorway isto não deve acontecer. Abraços, Linhares
cesarlanzoni (2015-04-13 11:03:29+00:00): Se for procurar no google, encontrará mais acidentes de veículos que atravessaram um canteiro central de grama de 10 metros do que nos 4 metros de asfalto do canteiro da asa. Aquela faixa no centro da asa não é de rodagem é de canteiro separador!
Linhares (2015-04-15 12:28:20+00:00): Ok. Você considera que a faixa pintada no chão é suficiente. Eu respeito sua opinião.
Gostaria de chamar a atenção para outro detalhe: numa cidade planejada como Brasília a tendência é que todas as pistas fiquem com o nível de classificação no máximo. Por isso precisamos ser mais rigorosos! Se não, o mapa perde informação. Imagina alguém de fora tentando identificar quais são as vias principais e ver todas azuis?
MCDA (2015-04-08 16:06:07+00:00): Why does it have a road running through it?!?  Is the coffee shop a drive through?
Abominable Snowman (2015-04-08 16:21:42+00:00): I'm sorry there isn't a road going through it. I'm not fully sure of the exact area of the shop because there isn't a picture of the foundation there. You cannot miss it as the coffee shop should be visible from the road and the minute you enter the car park. Apologies for any confusion.
will_p (2015-04-08 17:37:29+00:00): My personal preference would be to delete these descriptive names completely or move them to the description tag. I think the rule of not including route names in the name tag is worth following because they usually clash with street names or other routes. Parts of 'The Big Track' by the river could also be named 'Trent Valley Way', for example.
Xmypblu (2015-04-09 23:42:59+00:00): будет здорово, если проставите правильно теги
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить
а заодно и время работы, возможно телефон и т.п.
Geofreund1 (2015-07-16 12:31:58+00:00): Survey 15.07.15: ist in der Tat nicht vorhanden [img]http://up.picr.de/22549123ei.jpg[/img]
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-11-26 05:00:43+00:00): Is note http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337421757 a tool stand (the meaning of the tag) or a bicycle shop (use shop=bicycle)?
Sportbommel (2020-12-03 18:36:12+00:00): Hallo, was wurde hier diskutiert?

Mfg Stefan
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-24 21:03:03+00:00): Kolego, ulice w OSM nazywamy z imionami.
Jako początkujacego, zapraszam do lektury: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632
GerdP (2015-11-24 20:56:12+00:00): Hi there,
I've found a few roads with tags like 
layer="Carrer del Llatzaret"
I've changed layer to name. OK?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35559727
EliziR (2015-11-24 21:57:52+00:00): Hi,
Ok, it was my fault... :(
Danke =)
GerdP (2015-11-25 09:38:07+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. It happens quite often with JOSM, maybe it is an error in the 
editor. I've noticed that once: Clicked on name 
and JOSM showed the lanes field, clicked on lanes and JOSM showed the name field. Unfortunately I was not able to reproduce it after a restart of JOSM.
lg08 (2015-04-08 18:47:03+00:00): route finder
lg08 (2015-04-08 18:45:51+00:00): route finder for lancaster lecture hall
maraf24 (2015-05-10 20:27:13+00:00): Nieładnie.
JJJWegdam (2020-12-01 14:14:21+00:00): Hi Stevea,

the source of your changeset is unfindable. Do you still have it somewhere? Cheers

Best regards,
JJJWegdam
stevea (2020-12-01 23:11:47+00:00): Wow, it was five years ago I did that from a five-year-old source (now ten years old).  Apologies, but that's a long time for anything to not turn into a dead link on the web and I don't have a good source for NE Corridor speed limits — it's actually a dataset I've been looking for (high-quality, of course) for quite some time.  Unfortunately, I did not download a copy of the PDF file.

If you do find such a source, please update our https://www.osm.org/wiki/United States/Railroads wiki with a link; thank you!
JJJWegdam (2020-12-01 23:46:07+00:00): I can imagine. No problem. I was simply interested, because I’m currently completing speed limits in Europe (for main lines) and I had nowhere else to go to.

You might be interested in 
http://www.realtransit.org/nec7.php and http://www.realtransit.org/nec12.php. It can be used to create quite an accurate speed limit representation, by making an estimate of the mileages.

Probably you already know it, but just to be sure:
https://tiles.openrailwaymap.org/#osm.org/6/40.078546/-74.336713&overlays=electrification

Cheers
clay_c (2020-12-02 23:01:04+00:00): I recently added milepost data to the Northeast Corridor based on FRA GIS data. I only added mileposts every 5 miles to save time, though the original data source has them for every mile if needed.