piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-21 07:21:31+00:00): What is purpose of ERROR_FLAG and other weird keys in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186766112 and other imported objects?
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-03-23 22:13:12+00:00): Hallo Stefan, wenn ich die Historie richtig lese, hast du 2012 den damaligen Radweg R11 als Ganzes kopiert und einen kleinen Teilabschnitt entspr. R11a geändert. Das hat zur Folge, dass eine Wegänderung bei Feldbach nun in 2 Relationen zu korrigieren ist. Dein Ansatz skaliert nicht, stell dir vor es gibt 3 Abschnittsvarianten, dann wären 6 Kopien erforderlich. Das macht keinen Sinn. Oder?
Was wolltest du mit der Kopie erreichen?
LG Robert
StefanTiran (2019-03-23 22:43:01+00:00): Hallo!

Prinzipiell erachte ich es als vollkommen richtig, unterschiedliche Verläufe auch in unterschiedliche Relationen zu packen. Dem Vorwurf, dass das nicht skaliert, kann ich entgegenhalten, dass es im JOSM viel leichter festzustellen ist, ob es eine Lücke gibt, wenn alle Relationen-Member eine durchgehende Linie von Anfang bis Ende ergeben. Nicht umsonst wurde diese Art des Mapping auch bei Bus-Routen eingeführt, und bei manchen Regionalbuslinien gibt es noch wesentlich mehr als 6 Varianten.

Wie auch immer, nachdem ich nicht mehr in der Steiermark wohne, reiße ich mich auch nicht darum, die Radwege zu warten. Wenn Du die Relationen nach Deinen Vorstellungen änderst, werde ich sicher keinen Edit-War anzetteln. 

Trotzdem würde ich Dir anraten, Dich mit der lokalen Community abzustimmen, entweder, in dem Du zum Grazer Stammtisch gehst und das dort diskutierst, oder indem Du auf der Mailing-Liste https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at?language=de Deine Vorstellung bezüglich Relationen abstimmst.

Liebe Grüße aus Orth an der Donau!
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-03-24 00:14:51+00:00): Hallo Stefan! Der Vergleich mit den Busrouten hinkt – Radrouten haben weder Haltestellen noch Abfahrtszeiten und diese bestimmen die Lösungsstruktur. Keine Lösung ist frei von Nachteilen, es ist eine Frage der Gewichtung, welcher Kompromiss ein Optimum darstellt. Wieviel schwerer ist bei Superrouten das Erkennen von Lücken? Was wiegt die Vereinfachung der Wartung?
Ich habe kein Problem, unterschiedliche Sichtweisen zu akzeptieren, wenn du es so für richtig hältst, greife ich es nicht an. Eine Diskussion mit der Community läuft zu einem sehr ähnlichen Thema: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65696 . Bitte beteilige dich daran.
LG Robert
Gppes (2019-03-24 09:22:06+00:00): Hallo Stefan, zu Eurem (fuer mich eher komplexen) Thema habe ich leider keine Meinung, aber ich habe auf OSM Deinen neuen Wohnort besucht und festgestellt, dass der als place=town gemappt ist. Jetzt wo Du ja dort wohnst: Meinst Du passt das? Im Forum gibt es zu dieser Problematik eine durchaus interessante Diskussion (wenn auch eher fuer Salzburg): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65610

Lg aus Leoben (wir kennen uns vom dortigen Stammtisch), Gppes
GerdP (2018-11-01 06:14:41+00:00): Hi! I wonder if "Parramatta Liverpool Cycleway" really is the name of those ways. My understanding is that this is or was the name of the route relation, not the sidewalks. In other words, I'd like to remove the name from the ways. What do you think?
efAston (2018-11-01 08:34:43+00:00): Hi,

The naming of the routes comes from the RMS (roads and maritime ministry). Much of their cycleways only exist in maps they make available and some sparse signage which isn't easy to piece together.

Cheers,
Aston
GerdP (2018-11-01 09:15:18+00:00): Hi Aston,
thanks for the quick answer. I don't doubt that the route exists, what I don't believe is that the ways that make up the route all have the same name. I think they are sidewalks of roads which have a name and thus those sidewalks either have no name or the name of the major road, but probably not the name of a route relation.
efAston (2018-11-01 10:36:09+00:00): That's what RMS called it. They used to have several areas of Sydney split up into cycleway maps, and the South-Western one was the "Parramatta Liverpool Cycleway", not as a particular route, but as all cycleways in the area. It doesn't really mean anything anyway, a lot of the "cycleways" are just backstreets that they suggest using to keep cyclists out of the way (even if the streets are worse and more dangerous to be on than the main road). Some of these routes have blue signs with a picture of a bicycle, saying how many kilometres to other suburbs on the cycleway and which direction, but you still need to know the way, since these signs aren't at all the turns, and some suggested cycle routes have no signage at all, and only exist on paper. Actual shared paths are rare in NSW.t
GerdP (2018-11-01 11:32:04+00:00): Seems you still talk about the name of the relation. I am talking about the name of the ways, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186857367
efAston (2018-11-01 18:27:29+00:00): Take your pick. That's what they were called on the RMS cycleway maps, but like I say, a lot of these cycleways only exist on paper. And their current cycleway map publication is different anyway. You'll never see a sign on a shared path saying "Parramatta Liverpool Cycleway". All you'll see is a blue sign with a picture of a bike on it, which tells you how many kilometres to Parramatta and how many to Liverpool. The stretches of shard path you're looking at would definitely be part of that cycleway.
GerdP (2018-11-01 20:08:54+00:00): Ok, so that means I can remove the name tags from those ways.
zstadler (2017-12-12 17:12:30+00:00): Hello Lavad,
.
Thank you for your contribution to OSM.
.
In this edit you have mapped two "bridleway" roads:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186894487
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186906128
.
Are these roads intended for primary use by horse riders?
.
Please also check the bridleway
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186910842/history
you added in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/13580791
Lavad (2017-12-12 17:34:02+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186894487
This is a meandering path that runs along a steep slope, between two asphalt roads. This trail can pass only a pedestrian. Employees use to shorten the path.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186906128
This is an old dirt road, shortens the path between the park and the residential area. It is used by motor transport.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186910842/history
This is an old dirt road. It was once used by motor transport for accelerated departure to the 4th track.
zstadler (2017-12-15 07:52:14+00:00): I'll change them to path, track and track, accordingly.
Jazzzz (2019-05-29 12:08:03+00:00): Bonjour, je sais que cette modification date, mais tu as ajouté le code postal 65710 à Bagnères-de-Bigorre, mais je ne trouve aucune source reliant Bagnères-de-Bigorre à ce code postal. Te souviendrais-tu de ta source, ou serait-ce juste une erreur ?
Merci d'avance !
Verdy_p (2019-05-29 23:43:11+00:00): Pfff! Il y a 6 ans. Il s'en est passé des choses. Je ne peux pas me souvenir des détails, mais le code postal devait déjà être là, où une source ancienne (impossible à déterminer) mentionnait ce code postal.
Il est possible aussi que ce soit une erreur (note: il y a 6 ans on n'avait pas encore toutes les communes en France, c'était un gros chantier), de même les cantons ont été chamboulés et il y a eu pas mal de monde à bosser dessus, il y a pu y avoir des mélanges ou fusions incorrectes (conflits de modifs mal résolus, ou mauvais copier-coller par mi tout un tas d'autres modifs correctes) qui ensuite se sont propagées sans être détectés depuis.
Pour un cas comme ça, corrige directement.
Verdy_p (2019-05-29 23:45:07+00:00): De plus depuis 6 ans, des tas de coes postaux ont changé (la poste a fusionné pas mal de zones de distributions et fermé plein de bureaux, surtout dans les zones très rurales comme ici)
Verdy_p (2019-05-30 00:03:07+00:00): Note: ne supprime pas les codes postaux sur les relations, il en faut un (et pas seulement sur le noeud central de la commune qui n'indique pas les codes postaux applicables autour mais juste le code postal sur un point isolé, pas forcément au point désigné mais pour la mairie: c'est très approximatif ensuite de déterminer les codes postaux car on ne peut pas déterminer facilement parmi ceux présents autour, où il peut y avoir des codes postaux locaux spécifiques comme les Cedex ou des codes postaux de contact d'un siège ou d'un secrétariat situé totalement ailleurs).
Verdy_p (2019-05-30 00:27:57+00:00): Note: c'est visiblement toi aussi "Marcel Herault" qui fait ces suppressions massives au lieu de corriger ?
Verdy_p (2019-05-30 00:30:17+00:00): Et je confirme: la Poste a bel et bien fusionné des zones postales dans la zone, donc c'est le code postal qui a changé depuis en regroupant la commune dans la zone du 65200...
Verdy_p (2019-05-30 00:33:04+00:00): De plus le 65710 est toujours en vigueur (65200 c'est le bureau de Tarbes)
Verdy_p (2019-05-30 00:40:08+00:00): le 65710 est utilisé dans les secteurs de la commune encore desservis par le bureau de Campan (qui dessert aussi Baudéan, Gripp et Sainte-Marie-de-Campan). Note bien que la commune est très grande. Je pense aussi qu'il y a des secteurs desservis par d'autres bureaux.
le 65200 de Tarbes donne une zone très grande (pour le courrier standard), mais pour les colis et la logistique, le 65710 est encore utilisé.
La Poste n'est plus seule propriétaire des codes postaux, elle peut se restructurer mais sans impacter les autres distributeurs qui ont encore besoin de codes plus localisés (ou sinon se verront obligés de créer leurs propres codes pour gérer les tournées de livraison).
GerdP (2015-12-01 13:20:43+00:00): Hi there!
I've changed maxspeed=1 to lanes=1.
OK?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186961633
NoelB (2015-12-01 20:03:46+00:00): GerdP, 
I don't have a problem with you editing changesets, its what OSM is about.
NoelB
GerdP (2015-12-01 21:11:20+00:00): OK, I am not a local, I just thought that maxspeed=1 must be  
a typo. Other mappers use maxspeed=* to indicate 
that the road should not be used, so I try to be careful.
jeka p (2016-12-23 07:21:50+00:00): Hallo Imagic,

"B44" steht auf dem Schild hier nicht:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19754389#map=17/48.17535/16.05845

Gruss,
Jeka
eggie (2021-08-22 11:50:43+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-10-10 08:21:54+00:00): zobacz http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/448921 (ten sam obiekt otagowany dwa razy)
eggie (2018-10-27 08:31:29+00:00): Na jaren weer een edit.. dus opnieuw .. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
HubMiner (2017-08-15 04:47:04+00:00): Hi, trying to understand your logic with stop signs... Can we just use a single stop sign at intersection, instead of all 4 stop signs per each intersection?  If we decide to simplify, there are multiple intersections nearby with the same style.  Thanks!
gamerzgadgets (2018-01-03 12:12:42+00:00): Nice http://gamerzgadgets.com/
aharvey (2017-10-14 02:37:22+00:00): With relation 2521345 any reason why you've used except=psv? From the signage it should be except=bus?
aharvey (2017-10-14 02:37:53+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.771155303278704&lng=151.08031233063525&z=17&username%5B%5D=aharvey&signs=true&pKey=tV6yavMPhO16GMGJxU_DLA&focus=photo&menu=false&x=0.8206062351231989&y=0.13901422932967647&zoom=3
cleary (2017-10-14 06:06:11+00:00): I think I was wrong, confusing "bus" with "psv".  Also it appears hours have been changed since restriction was first added. I would be pleased if you could correct the information. Thanks for your conscientious observation of this error.
aharvey (2017-10-15 03:00:08+00:00): no problem. done in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52944761
Constable (2018-01-27 22:15:46+00:00): ciao, anni fa hai aggiunto l'asilo nido, sai anche il nome ufficiale? sarà pur intitolato a  qualcuno, no?
Grazie
eggie (2017-09-26 08:03:47+00:00): Opnieuw welkom gestuurd per PB
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-06 14:32:22+00:00): Zerkniesz na http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1197355 ?
SomeoneElse (2015-11-08 22:47:51+00:00): What's the source of the name "London Orbital Motorway" here?  See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/464953 .  In particular see http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=846862 which shows no name on the M25.
c2r (2015-11-09 06:33:34+00:00): I doubt I added the name in the first instance - I was probably splitting ways, adding lighting/non lighting/carriageway_ref/lanes/bridges/embankments from the existing way.

That said, on approach to the motorway, there used to be signs saying "London Orbital M25 x miles".   I'm sure that some fo the literature at the time it was built (after it was known it was going to be a single road) named it "London Orbital Motorway".  Also public enquiries at the time referred to the London Orbital: http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11292342
zstadler (2020-10-12 08:08:10+00:00): Hi,

Do you know if the construction of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187298429 was completed?

Thanks!
yrtimiD (2020-10-16 15:36:10+00:00): can't confirm, but I believe it is ready
marc__marc (2019-09-14 12:04:25+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187349096
It's a craft=sculptor ? (missing p)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft:sculptor
ViriatoLusitano (2017-01-02 08:55:57+00:00): Olá Jorge, estou a mapear o Campus de Gualtar da Universidade do Minho e estava curioso em saber se estes dados estão actualizados para 2017.
bernardo60 (2022-02-21 13:10:57+00:00): The tag "motorroad" makes no sense. In Indonesian, it would be "jalan toll" with no access for bikes and pedestrians. This is not the case.
eggie (2017-12-02 14:27:14+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Luzandro (2024-11-13 06:39:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4516987
wille (2017-02-03 12:02:03+00:00): oi, Tiago! adicionando um comentário apenas para testar um possível bug no OSM.... :)
trial (2020-08-12 15:40:37+00:00): Bonjour, comme vous avez ajouté Le Guern au nord et Les Guerns au centre, ne doit-on pas supprimer le nom ici ?
Libre à Quimperlé (2020-08-12 18:02:18+00:00): Ces deux adresses correspond à une mise à jour que je réalise depuis le site de FANTOIR.
Je suis en cours de mise à jour des adresses de Quimperlé.
J'ai fait tout les lieux-dits pour qu'il soit en rapprochement avec JOSM.
Il existe deux références distinct.
29233B027D = Le Guern
29233B028E = Les Guerns
C'est le quel nom que vous voulez supprimer celle de la zone "natural Wetland" ?
trial (2020-08-12 18:38:56+00:00): Oui, c'est bien le seul objet concerné par ce changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157997671
Un autre possibilité mais je ne connais pas la réalité locale c'est de n'avoir qu'un des deux lieux-dits (en utilisant alt_name).
Vu qu'il y a un seul marias, Le Guern ça m'allait bien.
À propos de Fantoir les directions cardinales telles que https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7111016083 NE doivent PAS être mises dans OpenStreetMap.
Libre à Quimperlé (2020-08-12 19:27:17+00:00): Oui il y a qu'un seul marais.
Mais Fantoir vois deux Lieux-dits.
Je met à jour selon FANTOIR et je laisse à qui le veux, le soins de corriger car je n'ai pas la solution.
Poul Raned c'est pareil j'ai deux références.
Je peux biens sûr supprimer Poul Raned Nord mais je vais avoir Deux Poul Raned et deux références Fantoire.
Là ce n'est plus de mon ressort je n'aime pas faire un choix savoir si c'est le bon.
Je compte justement sur les internaute qui connaise le lieux pour intervenir et corriger.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-26 02:13:12+00:00): I modified some highways based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Warin61 (2018-12-16 05:04:36+00:00): Restored these names!
It does not matter if the road is flooded .. it still has the same name.
The alternate tracks do not have the name QAA Line .. I have 'named' them 'alternate QAA route'.
JesseFTW (2022-05-27 14:04:05+00:00): Do you happen to remember the source you used for these undersea communications cables?
Arma IRM-ED (2021-03-03 08:27:01+00:00): Hi, Dymo12. Thank you for your mapping contribution. 

I have changed this highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/187965744) to be unclassified due to the condition and the length of the highways. If I'm wrong or we need more discussion about it, please contact me or you can reply in this changeset's comment. Thank you
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2020-02-28 10:46:05+00:00): Hello,
I know I'm writing about a very old changeset. I'm wondering why IGI airport is mapped as a huge aeroway=taxiway ("a path for aircraft at an airport connecting runways with aprons, hangars, terminals and other facilities") instead of aeroway=aerodrome (" used to hold all the main details for an aerodrome"). Before correct it, I would like discuss/warn at least you and the last user who edited IGI airport.
Cheers
  Alessandro
Oberaffe (2020-02-28 23:29:06+00:00): Dear Alessandro,
a area of a taxiway ist not wrong. It is used in many airports of india. If you want a mark a ref number on the taxiway you can use the line in the middle of the taxiway. Dont remove the area tag please.
A taxiway as an area is more in more than 1600 aiports used:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=aeroway&value=taxiway#combinations
Cheers
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2020-03-02 07:09:50+00:00): Hello,
I know is not wrong, I was just pointing that this relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2532011 cover runways as well and probably many parts that actually aren't taxiways
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-10 19:14:52+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1202179
os-emmer (2025-06-01 14:25:54+00:00): Hello johanemilsson,
you added a ferry route here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187999677
It is currently ending in the middle of the ocean. Do you know where it goes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4582442
sperlingskauz (2018-01-20 22:06:45+00:00): Hi biker@gf,
zu deiner Information: Ich habe dein Tagging man_made=insecthouse in man_made=insect_hotel abgeändert. Anlaß ist, dass es nun eine deutschsprachige Wiki-Seite für Insektenhotels gibt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dinsect_hotel . 
Gruß,
sperlingskauz
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-12 04:54:17+00:00): Was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159018215 ever built?
Johnny Mapperseed (2016-03-16 01:44:23+00:00): Did you just indiscriminately mark a whole area as being farmland?
Johnny Mapperseed (2016-03-16 01:47:12+00:00): Oh nevermind. I just realized this is from a while ago. Please disregard my comment ^_^
aharvey (2018-01-13 02:05:55+00:00): how about adding https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/club=surf_life_saving to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1784560989 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:36:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1987013502/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
osmviborg (2024-02-01 15:48:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37152675
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 10:34:03+00:00): Hello patester24

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap many years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188162120 was edited here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.

If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 10:37:44+00:00): Hello NG Apparels,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188183372 was added here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. However, given your account name I presume it's actually your shop - in that case "local_knowledge" would be a perfectly good source for OSM.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
GerdP (2015-11-03 19:51:55+00:00): please review:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/63174448
The tag highway=flashers is only used here.
Is it a special form of highway=traffic_signals?
philippec (2022-02-27 09:01:29+00:00): Deerlijk begraafplaats.  Welk soort geodetisch punt  is dat ?  Ik vind het niet terug.  https://gdoc.ngi.be/?lang=nl&x=373327.50&y=6595388.87&zoom=15&l=nl&baseLayer=ngi.cartoweb.topo_bw.be&layers=alti_coord,plani_coord,three_d_coord
SomeoneElse (2021-02-04 00:12:57+00:00): Hello  Ed_Palma,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188295780 was added with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.

If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
Ed_Palma (2021-02-04 00:23:54+00:00): Sure, I have personal knowledge of this area.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-04 00:30:53+00:00): Thanks - done.
andershl (2021-08-12 19:37:18+00:00): Where do these peak names originate? Officially approved?
Russell Hore (2024-11-13 15:54:14+00:00): These are from the expedition report to that part of Greenland.
I am not sure fi they are officially approved by Denmark but that is what they would be known as if searching for them
andershl (2024-11-13 18:42:23+00:00): Great, there are lots of unofficial / not yet approved geographical names in the area. You may easily be able to find some 50-100 that I added based upon expedition reports.
andershl (2024-11-13 18:43:23+00:00): PS: Best to mention WHICH expedition :-)
Russell Hore (2025-01-05 10:10:09+00:00): We had an expedition to Dronning Louise Land in 2007 and another party flew in with us. This is from both reports.
mckale (2018-01-12 07:50:25+00:00): błąd ... skałe wyswietla na Bałtyku
Arma IRM-ED (2021-03-03 08:26:58+00:00): Hi, Dymo12. Thank you for your mapping contribution. 

I have changed this highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/188368912) to be unclassified due to the condition and the length of the highways. If I'm wrong or we need more discussion about it, please contact me or you can reply in this changeset's comment. Thank you
eggie (2020-10-15 20:10:38+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-12 04:26:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188426204 - that should probably be completed by now, safe to mark it as no longer under construction?
Talitha IRM-ED (2022-12-15 09:05:02+00:00): Hi, osmgspot. Thank you for your mapping contribution.
I changed this natural=water (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/188477808) to leisure=swimming_pool based on the imagery. 
Thank you and happy mapping!
ForstEK (2019-05-17 12:38:15+00:00): Здравствуйте, Movses! Этот объект https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1991283084/history лучше отметить через "building=garage" и "material=metal".