piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dx125 (2020-12-26 12:03:37+00:00): Guten Tag,
Du hast in Nennhausen und anderswo im Havelland zusätzliche Wege als Hausanbindungen eingetragen, meist mit dem Zusatzkey "access = private".
Auf dem Stück von der Straße bis zum Gartenzaun, bis zum Tor, ist "access = private" unnötig (da meist öffentlicher Grund), erst auf dem Privatgrundstück selbst ist "access = private" dann richtig. 
Trotzdem Danke für Deine Beiträge und Du brauchst auch Deine früheren Changesets jetzt nicht nachbessern, mein Hinweis ist für die Zukunft gedacht.
Viele Grüße
Seva-snz (2020-10-19 21:00:47+00:00): О, спасибо! только собирался начать добавлять сопки - вы уже всё сделали)
только мне кажется protect_class=3, это вроде просто памятник природы. Кстати я сравнил скриптом координаты в той газете и на aari - всё совпадает, норм
luiswoo (2020-10-20 09:15:16+00:00): Этот "памятник" в кадастре есть, чего бы координатам из постановления не совпасть с кадастром. 
Можно было JOSM настроит на местную систему координат, и без всяких скриптов импортировать.
Seva-snz (2020-10-20 18:46:26+00:00): а мск-74 тоже поддерживается, или можно через какой-нибудь плагин с параметрами такое проворачивать?
luiswoo (2020-10-20 23:50:28+00:00): В виде пользовательской проекции в настройках проекции. Как в QGIS. К примеру тут есть: https://github.com/Biryuchkov/openLand/blob/master/settings/gost-51794.txt
За адекватность этих проекций ничего не скажу. Это или знать нужно, или проверять опытным путём.
Точки\контур создаются в прямоугольной проекции. 
Хотя возможно лучше скрипт. Что-то в джосме сломали и проекция мск-61, до селе идеально ложившаяся, стала выдавать слегка перекошенный результат. На объекте размером с развязку это почти не заметно. На трассу в 10 километров уже вполне ощутимо. Точно не помню, но уже метры. Может это ошибка пересчета, без понятия.
eggie (2020-10-19 18:18:35+00:00): Wat je kunt toevoegen is 
operator=PostNL
drive_through	=no kun je verwijderen, want yes bestaat ook nauwelijks in Nederland.. behalve de MAC en de corona teststraat. 
Die tag komt uit de VS. Zelfs geld uit de muur doe je vanuit de auto. 
eggie
Pt873 (2020-10-24 18:11:30+00:00): Aeroporto?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-27 07:45:44+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4603430 if you remember this area or are still visiting it?
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
parsd51 (2020-10-20 10:21:25+00:00): Hej nbrummerstedt

Du har, i flere changesets, tegnet en del cykelstier som allerede er tagget på vejen, med tilhørende cykelrelationer.
Jeg vil foreslå at læse cykelstivejledningen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning

Generelt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

Hilsen
parsd51
nbrummerstedt (2020-10-20 12:20:22+00:00): Hej parsd51
Formålet var at gøre markeringen af cykelsti konsistent med resten af den markering, der løber hele vejen fra Strandvejen.
Specielt der hvor jeg har redigeret er det vigtigt, at man kan følge cykelstien visuelt på kortet, da det er en af supercykelsti-netværket.
Mvh Niels
parsd51 (2020-10-20 12:50:52+00:00): Hej Niels

OpenStreetMap er ikke et kort, men en database over faktiske forhold. Det er så op til korttegneren at vælge hvad de vil vise på kortet. openstreetmap.org har flere korttyper, bl.a. et cykelstikort. Standarkortet er blot et eksempel. Nogle mener nedlagte jernbaner er vigtige på kortet, derfor findes der kort som tegner dem.
En openstreetmap frase, er “for the data, not for the renderer”

Der har været lange diskussioner om for og imod separate cykelstier og man er blevet enige om cykelstivejledningen. Jeg foreslår du følger den for at undgå reverteringer.

Resten af Smakkegårdsvej heller ikke i overensstemmelse med vejledningen og har mangler ifht cykelnavigering, bl.a vil man kun kunne krydse vejen bestemte steder, hvilket man ville kunne ved tagning  på vejen - og i virkeligheden.

Hilsen
parsd51
nbrummerstedt (2020-10-20 13:04:27+00:00): Hej parsd51
Jeg forstår.
I så fald laver jeg det om jf. vejledningen på hele Smakkegårdsvej.
Mvh
parsd51 (2020-10-20 13:42:02+00:00): Hej igen

﻿Det lyder super :-)

Hilsen
parsd51
boda boda (2020-10-21 14:43:08+00:00): Bonjour Didier,

thanks for fixing ZeLonewolf's import, but have you asked him whether it was done according to the rules at all?

Kind regards
Jillis inactivE (2020-10-19 17:39:19+00:00): Revert betrof https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90953040
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
santamariense (2020-10-20 01:20:04+00:00): Para ficar bem mapeada a empresa, o ideal é delimitar a area do terreno da empresa e marcar como industrial, daí tu adiciona o nome na geometria da área.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92723045
luschi (2020-10-25 15:26:09+00:00): please recheck tis area!      
there are alot of overlapping buildings.      
thx
JASMein03M (2020-10-19 18:12:52+00:00): Alleen ik weet niet of ik de uiteindes ook nog ergens mee moet verbinden.
eggie (2020-10-19 19:34:03+00:00): Die losse eindjes laat je gewoon weg.
Dus tot het fietspad je zebra laten lopen. .
In de tagging van het fietspad kun je de tagging van het trottoir opnemen met sidewalk=right
Het is niet gebruikelijk om langsliggende trottoirs te tekenen. Consensus is er overigens niet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
gr eggie
eggie (2020-10-20 17:19:24+00:00): Losse eindjes voetgangersoversteek verwijderd.. tagging trottoir opgenomen in het fietspad. 
MVG,
eggie
DressyPear4 (2020-10-20 23:05:19+00:00): Qual a necessidade de apagar um objeto e depois adicionar novamente? Não seria melhor apenas mudar as tags ou fazer ajustes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92723838
flohoff (2025-02-20 08:37:57+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier gerade nach einem hinweis in einem neuen Note gesucht und da hast du schon langer zeit motor_vehicle auf der Straße ausgeschlossen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4633324

Geht um diesen Weg

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29205929

Das sieht in der Tat sehr seltsam aus.

Flo
user_5359 (2020-10-20 15:24:55+00:00): Hello! Don't add a bus route as an additional way. Please see the wiki: a route is a relation of the existing ways! Please have also a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/General_Transit_Feed_Specification/Mapping_to_OSM_tags
FrankOverman (2021-11-10 20:00:12+00:00): Hmmm, ik kijk naar de parking waarom ie momenteel (Nov'21) (weer) niet klopt: wist zeker dat ik hem opgedateerd had; ik traceer terug in de tijd en zie dat deze changeset alle parking updates weg heeft ge-edit.

Zie: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91462305

Volgorde: 78410472 --> 91462305 --> 92724049

Eens kijken of ik 92724049 nog gedeeltelijk terug kan draaien.
FrankOverman (2020-11-11 13:40:51+00:00): Ik denk te zien dat hier een recente edit van mijn hand weer is verwijderd:
de aansluiting van de P op de Dodenauweg is weer terug aangepast naar de oude situatie.

Zie links op mijn changeset:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91462305
Daar had ik way 851218503 aangelegd nav de nieuwe situatie.

Ik zie dat voor deze changeset een externe source is gebruikt en niet een survey ter plekke is gedaan.
FrankOverman (2020-11-11 13:43:32+00:00): Zie ook de sat van Augustus:
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl
ovruni (2020-10-19 18:38:27+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que algunas de sus contribuciones ha ingresado calles en zonas donde ya existían, generando un duplicamiento de las mismas, por favor considere editar las calles existentes en caso desee añadir información adicional. Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
DressyPear4 (2020-10-20 23:03:29+00:00): Olá, vias não devem ser sobrepostas, e a saída de rodovia deve ser colocado no ponto de ligação entre elas e não no meio da via
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92724818
Rodrigo306 (2020-10-20 23:17:10+00:00): Olá.
O número do ponto de ligação é equivalente a quilometragem da via. Por exemplo, o número 48 equivale ao quilômetro 48 da via.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92724818
DressyPear4 (2020-10-20 23:59:47+00:00): Seria um marco quilométrico?
Nesse caso deve ser mapeado dessa forma
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmilestone
como esse exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5403413700
eggie (2020-10-19 19:04:26+00:00): Lijkt me oke.. grade3 is inderdaad unpaved.
Wel is het zo dat unpaved /paved algemeen is.
De echte surface heeft de voorkeur.
surface=sand hoort bij grade3

surface=gravel hoort bij grade2
(wordt als half verhard gezien) 

Up to you.. Jij bent de lokale mapper!
MVG,
eggie
wireguy (2020-10-19 19:21:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM ZenV!   I think maxar imagery is better than bing in that area.   Keep mapping.   Ping me if you have any q's.
eggie (2020-10-19 19:09:20+00:00): Even ter Leering ende Vermaeck.

Geen landuse aan wegen vastmaken. het maakt de kaart onwerkbaar voor anderen.
Dus de wegen vrijhouden van landuse=grass
Wanneer de wegen nog niet af zijn .. dan highway=construction construction=residential
gr eggie
eggie (2020-10-19 19:10:48+00:00): Maar ik zie nu dat ze los liggen. Zou iets meer ruimte aan de weg geven
eggie (2020-10-19 19:20:45+00:00): In editor JOSM kun je satellietdataportaal op de achtergrond zetten. Je hebt dan de foto van september 2020 hier. Het klopt allemaal precies.
https://satellietdataportaal.nl/

en editor JOSM:
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
lyctkel (2023-11-29 08:49:40+00:00): Hi jfp553,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860794398 you used recycling:peoble=yes.
recycling:peoble isn't used anywhere else at OSM.
What is meant here?
Greetings from the Netherlands and regards
lyctkel
jfd553 (2023-11-29 13:37:21+00:00): Spelling error! I wanted to write “pebble”. However, “pebble” may not be an appropriate value. This bin is labeled granular rock, which includes crushed stone, crushed cement, and general aggregates. I will replace “peoble” by “aggregate” instead.
lyctkel (2023-11-29 14:19:38+00:00): Hi jfp553, 
thanks for the fast reply.
recycling:aggregate isn't used very often (3 times), while recycling:rubble looks as an other option (855 times used).
Details could be found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#Materials
Regards
lyctkel
jfd553 (2023-11-29 14:48:10+00:00): I will go for recycling:rubble then!
Thanks
BCNorwich (2020-10-20 14:05:49+00:00): Hi, This area tagged leisure=park is not a park or public leisure area. It is for the most part highway and highway verge. You've drawn lots of these some overlapping and some joined to the highway center line. Could you please remedy these anomalies, either remove or redraw and re-tag them.

Regards Bernard.
JonHDeesideOC (2020-10-20 15:06:04+00:00): Hi Bernard,
I'm trying to produce an orienteering map of the estate via openorienteeringmaps.  Ownership of the land is complex, but most of the areas marked 'park' are owned by the estate management company e.g. the larger grassy areas and much of the road border areas.  There's generally no difference between the small verge areas between the footpath / residential roads and the larger play areas.  Not sure what to tag if not 'park'? I need to differentiate the land from private lawn areas.
I wasn't aware there's a problem snapping to the centre-line and over-lapping but I can correct those - I'm new to this game.
Thanks Jon
BCNorwich (2020-10-23 07:46:29+00:00): Hello Jon, 
The tag leisure=park indicates an area of open space for recreational use, please see:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark. Parks don't usually extend to highway center lines as it would not be safe for folk to walk or play on the highway. It is very simple to zoom in and accurately map park areas. When multiple features are drawn with a single linear demarcation it is very difficult to isolate one feature for amendment. The park areas here are not joined to the highway center lines.

You describe the grass areas by the roads as verges so they are not parks. A correct tagging would be verge=yes surface=grass Unfortunately this tagging is not at present rendered on OSM standard layer but it can be rendered. A tagging that is rendered is verge=yes landuse=grass. 
Verges however abut a highway, not extend over it nor to the center line. So the outlines of these areas need amending. The verge areas could be drawn over the highways as roads and paths can are usually rendered on top of areas but as I said multiple features on one line are very difficult to amend. Anyway by zooming in it's very easy to precisely draw areas.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-10-24 07:19:31+00:00): Hi, There's a duplicated highway, path on top of Denehurst Park Way. The areas that you've joined to Denehurst Park Way need to be amended to get to the duplication. This is the problem with unnecessarily joining areas to highways.

Please decide what you can do about all those park areas, then I can get to and remedy the highway duplication.

Regards Bernard.
JonHDeesideOC (2020-10-25 12:14:55+00:00): Hi,
Just been looking at an analogous area in Northwich and I'll have a go at duplicating what has been done there.  I'll make a start clearing up DP.
Jon
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:43:55+00:00): source: bustimes.org
mdelatorre (2020-10-21 19:01:23+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92726349
businessesMan (2022-05-11 14:15:21+00:00): Moin Moin, mir war aufgefallen, dass du hier eine Ust-IdNr. eingetragen hast. Bitte immer das Landeskürzel davor(ohne Leerzeichen), also in diesem Fall "DE", nicht vergessen. Bei Telefonnummern bitte auch das Leerzeichen vor der Durchwahl nicht vergessen.
geohobbes (2022-05-13 19:41:11+00:00): Korrigiert/ergänzt, danke für den Hinweis.
businessesMan (2022-05-13 19:48:59+00:00): Gerne, danke dir auch für deinen Beitrag. Weiterhin fröhliches mappen :)
PatrickySS (2020-10-20 00:06:22+00:00): A Rua Francisco de Paula Seara é mão unica até a Rua Aristides Francisco Palumbo, então a "parte toda" estava certa, favor tomar cuidado nas próximas edições.
user_707140 (2020-10-20 00:43:04+00:00): Errado, acabei de passar ali, ela só é mão unica até a primeira esquina.
user_707140 (2020-10-20 00:45:29+00:00): "favor tomar cuidado nas próximas edições." não é o tipo de comentário útil para a comunidade.
PatrickySS (2020-10-21 00:44:33+00:00): Acho que você está se confundindo, eu passei ontem e a rua é mão unica até Rua Aristides Francisco Palumbo, nesse vídeo da pra ver o fim da mão unica(http://abre.ai/bGtO) e sobre o meu comentário "favor tomar cuidado nas próximas edições" é só pra tomar cuidado com as edições para evitar erros.
BS97n (2020-10-21 17:54:16+00:00): *Kioskvorplatz
Frans S (2020-10-21 12:58:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92727094
user_5359 (2020-10-20 18:11:48+00:00): Hello! Please check node http://www.osm.org/node/8023114247: What is the meaning of the tag 25=Retorno de Apatzingán?
tomincolorado (2020-10-20 18:23:22+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  It appears that user Nordpfeil has corrected it.  Thank you again and I'll stay aware of issues like this.  Sincerely, tomincolorado
ivanbranco (2020-10-19 21:12:14+00:00): Something went wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860819738
SomeoneElse (2020-10-19 21:19:07+00:00): I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92729414 before all the tile servers try ad render a new way extended across most of the planet.
@Fatma Ali Please do discuss this import if you haven't done this already - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import .
TravGW (2020-10-20 18:09:42+00:00): I can not see the park you added in any imagery source. Does it really exist?
AndyB_66 (2020-10-20 09:55:57+00:00): Dzięki! Mój manager haseł czasem robi mi takie psikusy.
aweech (2020-10-20 15:47:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just so you know, in OSM most abbreviations are expanded, so the "E 9000 S" and friends you made in this edit ought to be "East 9000 South". I'm going to go ahead and fix these road names.
VARVAR8 (2021-06-25 00:26:55+00:00): 1. Назва не повинна бути НАПИСАНА КАПСОМ.
2. Лаконічність перш за все. 2-3 слова буде достатньо в назві. (Храм святого духа - достатньо)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92729611
jaap de vries (2020-10-20 14:47:41+00:00): Kan je uitleggen waarom je bij Achterstraat 4 een woongebied maakt en bij nr 5 niet?
jaap de vries (2020-10-20 14:49:51+00:00): Ohja meestal gebruikt men de tag woongebied voor woonkernen, niet voor enkel een huis.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-20 17:40:35+00:00): Goeie kans dat ik die over het hoofd heb gezien. Gebeurt wel vaker. Voel je vrij om het aan te vullen.

Zelf vind ik landuse=residential bij enkele huizen passender dan helemaal geen landuse, dus dat is wat ik map. Ik was wel begonnen met de woonkern van Ommeren, maar toen kwam ik erachter dat er dan nog een hoop gaten overbleven en die heb ik ook een landuse gegeven.
dadavid (2025-03-10 15:09:28+00:00): Hi sdicke, 

ich bräuchte hier [1] mal Interpretationshilfe, was bedeutet maxweight=* bei einem highway=emergency_access_point? 

Viele Grüße :)

David

[1] https://www.osm.org/node/8023285547
tytusdu (2020-10-19 22:43:27+00:00): https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czach%C3%B3wek_%C5%9Arodkowy
tytusdu (2020-10-19 22:44:07+00:00): https://www.bazakolejowa.pl/index.php?dzial=stacje&id=9236&okno=start
CoyKoi (2020-10-20 00:19:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contribution. I have reviewed your edit and it looks good :) I've also added the playground slide which is next to the steps.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92730139
omgitsgela (2020-10-23 04:21:54+00:00): Hi charlieshied, and thanks for editing with OSM!

As requested, I've gone through and reviewed the edits you've made in this changeset. One thing I noticed is that you've marked driveways and Calle Louisa as access=private. This is going to cause the navigation apps to refuse to navigate a car down these paths. access=private is more suitable to roads in military bases, airport maintenance roads, factory roads... places where the public is prohibited. These driveways should probably be access=permissive instead, which will allow routing in some cases, but notes that the owner's permission is necessary to use it. Use access=private where a sign has been erected indicating the public is not allowed. You should double check Calle Louisa, because it's rare for a full residential road to not allow traffic on it.

Some of the segments you added where these roads join with others you marked as brand new roads, instead of extending the existing road or combining the ways together. What this will do is navigation clients will say "turn left on unnamed road, then continue straight onto Named Road." You should edit way 860840629 as a continuation of Douglas Mountain Drive, and way 860840627 as a continuation of Robinson Hill Rd.

One final note -- I would encourage you to not delete roadway segments that have problems if you can. Instead, try to edit them or reposition them to work the way you need them.

If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask. Happy mapping! :)
charliescheid (2020-10-23 07:25:05+00:00): Hi! Funny you mention the 'private' street situation since that's exactly what I was attempting to correct. I tried mapping this several times on various sites (I think I mentioned this in my comments), however, this whole area is a completely public road which is causing issues with routing. I did my best to remap it so any assistance is greatly appreciated!
omgitsgela (2020-10-23 04:34:10+00:00): Hi MistyB, and thanks for editing with OSM!

I reviewed your edits, as requested. Very good job overall! You have great attention to detail with all the tagging choices you made. The only advice I'd give is you should choose POI business tagging or building polygon business tagging, one or the other. Having business details in two places means there's two different "entities" for the business, and there should only be one. What I recommend is set the building type, give it address and levels, and then place a business POI within the building that has all the contact details and business name. If a business is the only business relevant to that building, then it's fine to merge the node and the building tags together, and just put everything on the building.

I hope this helps. Keep on mapping! :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92730657
user_6584176 (2020-10-19 22:41:01+00:00): 第一次用JOSM编辑，正在学习中来源https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/eo-browser/?zoom=15&lat=28.03536&lng=91.2677&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&datasetId=S2L2A&fromTime=2020-10-13T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2020-10-13T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=1_TRUE_COLOR&visualizationUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.sentinel-hub.com%2Fogc%2Fwms%2Fbd86bcc0-f318-402b-a145-015f85b9427e
TihiyDon (2020-10-27 16:52:57+00:00): То, чем ты занимаешься, называется вандализмом, и не приветствуется данным сообществом. Будь добр, отмени свои правки!
rskedgell (2021-04-19 10:02:44+00:00): Hi,

The cycleway (w860863241) you mapped in this changeset was changed to a bridleway with horse=designated and bicycle=designated in changeset #103145885. No source was given for this change and there appears to be no evidence from Kent CC PRoW data that any PRoW other than the parallel public footpath SD72.

The mapper also adds an entirely redundant access=no to every PRoW he edits. While adding this to (e.g.) a public footpath mapped as highway=footway + foot=designated will not affect routing, it changes the OSM Carto rendering from a coloured dashed line to faint grey and as such should be considered harmful.

NB the mapper does not respond changeset comments.
Tallguy (2021-04-28 23:44:58+00:00): Hi,
I've revisited, and cycled along, this 'way' again - latest imagery is on mapillary and Kartaview. There are still no signs indicating its intended purpose. It is next to a footpath, separated by a fence. It looks just like a cycleway, and the tyre marks on it show that local cyclists are using it, but there are no signs to indicate its legal status, or intended purpose. I've returned the tags to the way I initially tagged it. It's on a route I frequently travel, so I will add designation it/when it appears.

Regards

Nick (Tallguy)
FinixFighter (2020-10-20 11:04:28+00:00): Isn't this a kiosk more than a newsagant?
damianeue (2020-10-20 11:55:46+00:00): it is a kiosk AND a newsagent, I don't know which tag to prefer