piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2022-02-04 00:20:41+00:00): I don't know what the norm for cycling signage is in Warrington (haven't been there since the 80s) but if it's a cycleway I'd expect something like a blue "cycling" sign - maybe https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/55ba1284e5274a1521000023/sign-giving-order-route-pedal-cycles-only.jpg or https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/55ba12b1ed915d155c00001d/sign-giving-order-segregated-cycle-pedestrian-route.jpg , or some tactile paving that says ""cycleway" such as https://www.marshalls.co.uk/commercial/product/tactile-cycleway-unit, or something from the council that says (even if they haven't put up any signage) that they consider it a cycleway.  Without any of those it's just a footpath.
Best Regards,
Andy
Pete Owens (2022-02-04 01:55:02+00:00): Well google street view is up to date at the southern end and these are the two signs that are visible looking north across Boston Boulevard from the semi-circular cycleway to the south:
https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4002326,-2.6430699,3a,15y,18.36h,90.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s4DK55ObgEpe22bdVrWBMTw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4004129,-2.6424403,3a,15y,328.49h,93.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJr87OIKUW6Su3QZCynNuhQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Whereas the semi circular cycleway is clearly signed as such:
https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4004129,-2.6424403,3a,26.3y,176.1h,82.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJr87OIKUW6Su3QZCynNuhQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

At the northern end it is very out of date, but providing photographs of the non-existence of signage is rather tricky.
Falsernet (2022-02-05 22:50:28+00:00): I will go and photograph it IRL next time I'm out and link them
Glassman (2022-02-03 17:44:37+00:00): #TIP: when more than one business occupies a building, what we typically do is just place a node with the business info at their entrance. This avoids having a building within a building. There are 3D building guides but much more difficult to add.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116891478
Glassman (2022-02-03 17:50:11+00:00): The crosswalk should match what's on the ground. From the latest imagery, the crosswalk doesn't go diagonally across the street. I see that someone else removed your crosswalks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116891925
user_115918 (2022-02-08 20:17:51+00:00): This barn should be squared out
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116892016
eggie (2022-02-02 06:53:08+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. Bedankt voor de bijdrage. Kleine aanpassing verricht .. 
tourism=guest_house en guest_house=bed_and_breakfast  toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
user_115918 (2022-02-08 20:15:46+00:00): This house should be squared
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116892050
user_115918 (2022-02-08 20:14:30+00:00): The geometry of the buildings could be improved here. They are rectangles, but the outlines are very rough in this changeset
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116892075
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 02:24:59+00:00): 안녕하세요.
이름이 없는 보도나 인도에 '도봉투웨니퍼스트 2단지'이나 '동일로', '~~입구', '자전거도로 입구' 처럼 의미없는 이름을 적지 마시기 바랍니다. 굳이 중복된 이름을 적으실 필요가 없기 때문입니다.
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 02:25:26+00:00): name 태그에 괄호 등으로 이름이 아닌 것에 대한 설명을 넣지 않습니다. name 태그에는 해당 지물의 소유권자가 공식적으로 발표한 이름을 넣고, 만약 공식적인 이름을 찾을 수 없으면 해당 지물의 이름을 표기한 표지판에 적인 이름을 넣는다. 그것도 없으면 지역 사람들이 부르는 이름을 넣습니다.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names)
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 02:25:56+00:00): name 태그에 괄호로 뭔가 이름이 아닌걸 설명하는건 피해야 한다는 것입니다.
A s u R a (2022-02-02 02:46:00+00:00): 거기에 뭐가 있고 거기서 뭐라 부르는지 정확히 파악 후 주차장 통로 등의 수정을 하신건지... 거기는 단지 내 사유도로이고, 제가 그 단지 주민입니다.
A s u R a (2022-02-02 02:47:39+00:00): 여기는 공공 보행로가 아닙니다. 사유지에 포함된 출입로이고, 단지내 주민들을 위해 제한적으로 개방된 통로입니다. 단지내 출입로라고 명패가 붙어있구요.
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 02:48:18+00:00): 다른 자전거 도로나 진입로에도 '진입로' 같이 불필요하고 의미없는 이름을 적으면 지도 정보의 의미가 없습니다. 공식적인 이름을 적으세요. 이름이 아파트 이름과 같습니까?
A s u R a (2022-02-02 02:53:05+00:00): 1. name 태그에는 해당 지물의 소유권자가 공식적으로 발표한 이름을 넣고

2. 만약 공식적인 이름을 찾을 수 없으면 해당 지물의 이름을 표기한 표지판에 적인 이름을 넣는다.

3. 그것도 없으면 지역 사람들이 부르는 이름을 넣습니다.
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 02:53:21+00:00): 이름은 설명을 위한 것이 아닙니다. 도로명 표지판에 표시된 대로 전체 이름을 입력해야 하지만 도로 표지판에는 오류가 포함될 수 있습니다. "폐쇄된 술집(철거 예정)"  : 이름 대신 물건을 설명하지 마십시오.
A s u R a (2022-02-02 02:53:59+00:00): 이 지점의 명칭은 1, 2, 3 모두 해당됩니다.
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 02:59:17+00:00): 이름을 적는 대신에 허가된 통행에서 access = customers 태그만 설정하시면 됩니다. 굳이 적어서 알릴 필요가 없고 지도의 지형지물로서의 가치가 없습니다. 네이버 지도나 카카오맵 같이 인터넷 지도를 보면 아파트 단지 내 도로나 인도에 이름이 없지 않습니까?
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 03:16:04+00:00): 공식 명칭이 다루기 어렵거나 모호하여 실제로 사용하는 사람이 거의 없다면, 간판이 있더라도 주 이름으로 취급하기보다는 공식 명칭을 official name=* 또는 alt_name=*로 표기하는 것이 좋습니다.
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 03:18:17+00:00): 공식적인 이름이라면 도로에 "새바지길 (남한강 자전거길)" 같이 부연설명을 넣는 것이죠?
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 03:22:20+00:00): 이름 태그 는 기능의 일반 이름으로 사용해야 합니다. 기능을 설명하거나 레이블을 지정해서는 안 됩니다. 예를 들어, 사용하는 것은 올바르지 않습니다.이름=길숲을 통해 트랙도로에. 대신 기능 태그가 있어야 합니다.고속도로=길. 트랙에 일반 이름(예: 거리 이름)이 있는 경우 이름 태그도 있습니다. 그렇지 않다면 이름표가 없어야 합니다. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things)
user_5239402 (2022-02-02 03:25:24+00:00): 그리고 바뀜집합 댓글을 적어주시기 바랍니다. "수정"같이 포괄적인 것만 적으시면 “내가 여기서 무엇을 편집을 했고 이렇게 편집한 이유는 당신과 아무 상관이 없다.”라는 분위기를 냅니다. 변경 사항을 설명하기 위해 시간을 약간만 쓴다면, 다른 사람들에게 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어집니다. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)
kylor (2022-02-02 02:19:58+00:00): Tigard residential information found here:

https://maps.tigard-or.gov/Html5Viewer/Index.html?viewer=PublicAdvanced#

Landuse > Plats
AntMadeira (2022-02-02 12:34:24+00:00): Olá, Eduardo.
Sê bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap.

Reparámos que fizeste uma edição que pediste que fosse revista.
Pelo que percebi, adicionaste pontos com nomes de ruas que já existem. Qual é o objetivo da duplicação de um nome já existente na sua respetiva linha?

Para te ambientares melhor ao mundo OSM, aconselho-te a leres as boas práticas de mapeamento, nomeadamente o ponto "Uma característica, um elemento no OSM":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas

Se tiveres dúvidas, podes sempre entrar no canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa de OpenStreetMap, onde te poderemos ajudar:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
Firefishy (2022-02-02 09:30:44+00:00): I have removed the name from the house. It is unlikely that this is the name of the house ;-) Remember all edits are public.
gpserror (2022-02-02 02:37:36+00:00): Note to original drawing layout: we're not supposed to draw for the renderer and I'm sorry, on the flat OSM map the house should look like a rectangle.  However you can study how to draw 3d buildings and get it to render nicely on f4map or osmbuildings, I put in a first pass schwag at drawing something that sort of looks like this house but not exactly.  Feel free to improve on it.
tastrax (2022-02-13 01:03:57+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Glassman (2022-02-03 17:48:24+00:00): I agree with the removal of the crosswalk. But can I recommend you let the new mapper know what they did wrong? It may help them in the future.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-03 23:22:13+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out! I'll try to do that more consistently in the future.
ralley (2022-02-02 05:13:36+00:00): "Not Specified" is not used with the bicycle key anywhere else in OSM: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=bicycle#values  Whilst you are generally free to use what ever values you want, no data consumers will likely use this value so the default of not specifying at all, as it was, will be functionally equivalent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116892654
McNs (2022-02-02 06:46:29+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. Am I better simply removing the bicycle tag  in the Tags box? I had been using the dropdown options. Most paths in the area have no bicycle tags which is what I was trying to replicate
ralley (2022-02-02 08:08:54+00:00): Yes just leave tags of in this case.
A s u R a (2022-02-02 03:01:06+00:00): 해당 단지 거주자가 '주차장 통로'를 '주차장 통로'로 지정해놓는데, 이걸 왜 자꾸 다르게 변경하는지 모르겠네요. 저기는 주차장 통로입니다.
Glassman (2022-02-03 17:51:49+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116892801
user_115918 (2022-02-08 20:12:38+00:00): Any reason not to extend the driveway further towards the buildings here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116893047
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-04 15:20:56+00:00): Movió el nodo utilizando una imagen fuera de lugar. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3675711421/historia
5m4u9 (2022-07-04 22:25:57+00:00): Hola, en Cochabamba utilizamos la imagen satelital de Bing para ajustar los caminos porque es la que mejor corrección tiene respecto a MAXAR o ESRI. También uso las trazas GPS, pero en ese lugar hay un angosto (lugar estrecho entre 2 laderas de montañas altas) y hay mala recepción y existe una leve distorsión.

Como ese sector la carretera es casi recta, los automóviles circulan a 70-90 kmph, muy rápido. Trataré de conseguir otras trazas GPS para verificar.

El problema solo es en este sector, el resto del camino entre el trazo dibujado y las trazas GPS no hay mucha diferencia.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-04 22:59:35+00:00): O puede usar la capa de Strava que funciona con el viaje de miles de usuarios. https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-31 02:52:40+00:00): nota: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3498663
mariotomo (2022-02-02 15:40:05+00:00): hi, thank you for adding information to the OSM database. from your changeset count looks like you're a beginner; if you're regularly able to visit sparsely mapped areas, would you like to come in contact with other mappers? https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama & https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
PT-53 (2022-02-02 10:36:34+00:00): Hallo dmanddee;
Du hast diesen Weg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272987130/history
und diesen Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9467602333/history
neu eingezeichnet.
Soweit ich das anhand des Bing-Luftbildes beurteilen kann, ist das total falsch!

Das ist kein track, sondern die nördliche Hälfte eine private Hauszufahrt (service - driveway) und die andere Hälfte ein privater Fußweg (path + private).

Das Merkmal
access:delivery=no
ist unsinnig und entspricht nicht den Wiki-Vorgaben.

Ich bitte um Berichtigung.

Grüße
dmanddee (2022-02-04 08:48:05+00:00): Hi PT-53,

Thanks for notifying me with the error. I have added the gate with out modifying the existing road. Apologies for the erroneous edit. I have now deleted the gate and made the changes as per your feedback(116995517). I will make sure to refrain from doing such wrong edits. Happy to learn from you. 

Best Regards,
dmanddee
Straya (2022-02-05 07:46:48+00:00): How can I prevent a correct from being reverted by the oringinal mistake maker?
Straya (2022-02-05 07:47:28+00:00): Edit -  prevent a *correction
nevw (2022-02-05 11:30:51+00:00): One option would be to join the openstreetmap.org talk-au mailing list and raise and discuss the problem there.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
If you do not wish to discuss publicly and need assistance to resolve a problem you could contact the openstreetmap.org data working group 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
Straya (2022-02-06 01:51:30+00:00): OK, thankyou for the tips.
fabiotofy (2022-02-02 07:43:54+00:00): Ciao, attento che un numero civico lo hai indicato con "5https://ouo.io/l7bOhM" ....
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116895403
fabiotofy (2022-02-02 07:45:10+00:00): scusa, ho visto poi il secondo change 116895830
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116895403
user_5359 (2022-02-02 09:43:38+00:00): Hello! Please notice the standard value for the key addr:country for Kenya is KE . You use also the key contact instead of phone.

Why did you add shops with operational_status=closed? For example see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9467698839.
Whar is you interpretation of the key address?
Discostu36 (2022-11-04 12:33:58+00:00): Die Radfahrstreifen an der Eckernförder Straße hast du wohl geträumt.
Dmithry (2022-02-07 06:57:31+00:00): Changed street name based on user's feedback, Bing and data site(https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html)#mapbox_contribute
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116896001
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:04:49+00:00): #TIP: instead of adding a building inside of another, just place a node for the business near the entrance. I went ahead and made the change.

Also I noticed that the address of Teppanyaki Box was listed as South 1st Street, but the nearby street is labeled as North 1st Street. Could you correct the wrong one? Let me know if you need help.  I'll send you info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116896123
mavl (2022-02-03 13:20:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил здания с адресами и добавил на их место здания без адресов. В результате адреса пропали с карты.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975617110/history  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975617109/history  
  
Пожалуйста, не удаляйте объекты и не добавляйте вместо них новые. Редактируйте то, что уже есть на карте.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-09 18:31:36+00:00): Please do not classify roads as cartpaths. 
Read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Problematic_mapping/golf#The_Golf_Club_Games
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116896504
Mudumala (2022-04-29 09:13:38+00:00): Thanks for the edit
user_5359 (2022-02-02 08:42:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
willkmis (2022-02-02 06:17:24+00:00): *Downgraded Griffith Park Dr. to unclassified, got cut off
mavl (2022-02-03 13:37:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил со здания тег здания buillding. На здании должен быть тег builing.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219528385/history  
  
Это изменение отменено.
elsy1 (2022-02-02 15:38:33+00:00): توضیح شما برای انجام خرابکاری ها در نقشه چیست؟
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-02 13:04:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116897616
eggie (2022-02-02 07:15:22+00:00): Dag Bacchuss.. Scherp gezien. . Heb nog wel oneway:mofa=no toegevoegd.
Het zal weer routeren voor fietsers.
MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2023-06-12 08:08:16+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137166375
Warin61 (2022-02-02 23:10:02+00:00): Hi,
The 'Off Leash Dog' park... I have made some changes 

tag dog=yes to dog=unleashed
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dog
tag name=Off Leash Dog to description=Off Leash Dog area
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Keep mapping! The bush does need it.
Emmertex (2022-02-19 00:00:41+00:00): Thanks so much, Warin61.  Greatly appreciate the guidance and assistance!
eggie (2022-02-02 10:35:00+00:00): Kijk even hier coblestone is niet te fietsen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

Wellicht gezien je duidelijke  beschrijving 

surface=sett 	

way area 	Sett paving, formed from natural stones cut usually to a regular shape. The stones do not cover the surface completely, unlike paving_stones. 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-02-02 10:38:16+00:00): surface heb ik omgezet naar sett.. Dat wordt gezien als verhard. 
Zie info boven.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-02 12:42:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116899263
NNNNNNic (2022-02-02 08:14:20+00:00): la fontana in centro alla piazza risulta corretta
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-03 12:35:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116962016 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalising OSM and using inappropriate changeset comments
eggie (2022-02-02 09:35:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..  De VV Rheden staat al op het clubhuis. Het is wat overkill wellicht om het nogmaals op de SC Rheden velden te mappen.

Rheko en Worth kunnen wellicht ook op het clubhuis? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-02 09:39:41+00:00): Het sports_centre Rheko heb ik aangepast naar leisure=pitch  (veld)

korfbal  heb ik aangepast naar korfball dubbel l (tagging in UK English)

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-02-02 09:41:13+00:00): De velden kloppen niet met de luchtfoto PDOK  actueel
eggie (2022-02-02 09:42:57+00:00): Nog een tip.. Bing is sowieso outdated...  Beter PDOK instellen
eggie (2022-02-02 10:26:19+00:00): De velden heb ik aangepast conform de laatste sat foto 21-12-2021
Zismac (2022-02-12 04:53:50+00:00): Hello, and thank you for contributing to OSM! However, Reduced to Clear has already been added to the map, so now there are two duplicate POIs. I'll delete the duplicate in a couple days if you haven't yourself.
TrickyFoxy (2022-03-26 10:41:34+00:00): 👋 Не наносите highway=service на границы снт. Так вы обозначите всю площадь дорогой. Но даже если так: дороги по всей границе снт нет
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116899693
MxxCon (2022-02-02 23:51:45+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you map this apartment building as place of worship?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116900012
FraukeLeo (2022-04-15 05:46:42+00:00): Hallo Raa39, diese Brücke macht eine saubere gleichmäßige Kurve. Guck dir den Verlauf auf Mapillary an. Wenn das auf einem Luftbild anders aussieht, ist das Luftbild verzerrt (passiert gerade bei Talbrücken sehr oft, weil das Bild aufs Gelände korrigiert wird statt auf die Straße). Bitte nicht einfach kritiklos abmalen. Kein Mensch baut Brücken im Zickzack :) Ich mache das einfach mal rückgängig, ok?
FraukeLeo (2022-04-15 05:47:19+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119736600
josmougn (2022-04-30 23:28:56+00:00): il y a plein de notes "Dxxx" dans ce secteur et elles sont manifestement presque toutes fantaisistes : beaucoup de doublons avec parfois des numéros différents, pas de correspondance au cadastre ni dans la BD topo IGN ni dans Route 500 IGN. 
Je rempets ces 2 rues en residential sans ref=Dxxx
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-03 12:35:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116962016 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalising OSM and using inappropriate changeset comments
fabiotofy (2022-02-02 08:34:09+00:00): Ciao, sicuro che la fontana è proprio lì ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116900818
NNNNNNic (2022-02-02 08:45:46+00:00): si confermo
fabiotofy (2022-02-02 10:58:26+00:00): Ottimo. Buon proseguimento su osm
Tomas Straupis (2022-02-03 06:36:00+00:00): Laba diena. Nereikia keisti teisingai pažymėtų kūdrų landuse=basin į neteisingą žymėjimą natural=water+water=pond.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:57:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-02-02 09:46:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Wan neer de woningen zijn opgeleverd dan ook de specificatie-regel construction=house verwijderen.
Gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend in OSM, maar periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)
Je kunt dart bespoedigen middels een verzoek op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-02 09:52:46+00:00): Even als voorbeeld aangevraagd https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=854091#p854091
eggie (2022-02-02 09:56:11+00:00): Ellen van Langenpad aangepast naar highway=path  Construction verwijderd.
eggie (2022-02-02 10:02:24+00:00): Adres Ireen Wüststraat nr 61 verwijderd.
eggie (2022-02-02 10:12:21+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan?
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=02-02-2021&loc=51.92189%2C4.374313%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-09-18&acqid=20210918_111307_SV1-03%2C20210918_111308_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1
FrankOverman (2022-02-02 22:14:01+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=854181#p854181
eggie (2022-02-02 22:16:39+00:00): Frank... bedankt
Gr eggie
FrankOverman (2022-02-02 22:19:18+00:00): Graag gedaan weer :)
user_2066394 (2022-02-13 13:37:25+00:00): Link zum Fehlerhinweis?
Manfred538 (2022-02-16 07:22:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3030094
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3030074
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3030080
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
kubahahaha (2022-02-05 18:52:56+00:00): Podlinkuję jeszcze:
https://www.lublin112.pl/rzeka-zmienila-swoj-bieg-i-zalala-grodzisko-muzeum-stara-sie-uratowac-budynki-przed-zniszczeniem/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
nitro_expander (2022-02-04 04:14:59+00:00): undo? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9467987862
Dodko (2022-02-03 11:43:08+00:00): Email je s preklepom.
Pan Perníček (2022-02-03 11:51:50+00:00): Dobrý den,
děkuji za upozornění, chybu jsem upravila.
elsy1 (2022-02-02 15:36:30+00:00): درود دو خط پیاده رو که وجود ندارد از وسط بزرگراه ها و خیابان ها رسم کردید اشتباه شمارا  اصلاح کردم امیدوارم تکرار نفرمایید
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-03 12:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116962016 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalising OSM and using inappropriate changeset comments