piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LorenzoStucchi (2020-07-17 14:55:49+00:00): Ciao,
Ho visto che stai facendo diverse modifiche alcune volte cancellando degli elementi, è bene spiegare nel commento alla modifica cosa stai facendo e non solamente "modifche necessarie".
Ciao,
Lorenzo
user_5359 (2020-07-08 17:11:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Cascafico (2020-07-08 16:30:07+00:00): perchè hai cancellato il nodo del ristorante? aveva più informazioni ed è andato perso anche il numero civico.
Why you deleted restaurant? you added a new one with few tags and deleted permanently housenumber.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87715574
user_11452467 (2020-07-08 16:31:47+00:00): Perche era scritto malamente e per fare prima.
user_11452467 (2020-07-08 16:39:14+00:00): Evidentemente ha voluto farlo per questo motivo
KarmaCleaner (2020-07-08 16:43:47+00:00): Hai cancellato questo indirizzo:

addr:city=Trieste	
addr:housenumber=197	
addr:postcode=34127	
addr:street=Via dello Scoglio	

Cos'era "scritto malamente"?
user_6631989 (2020-07-08 18:01:51+00:00): Calcolando che l'indirizzo non l'ho minimamente calcolato poixhe ho toccato il poi della p9izzerria.
caro SanLuigi fatti gli affari tuoi, grazxie
SomeoneElse (2020-07-19 15:38:02+00:00): Hello,
A "place=country" tag got added to http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=6274990848 in this changeset.  What is this supposed to mean on this object?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_8334278 (2020-07-19 15:40:03+00:00): that is wrong
bobeeeze (2020-07-08 18:37:07+00:00): Hola GembDroid, gracias por tus contribuciones. Solo una corrección, la altura de la montaña se pone con la etiqueta "ele" y luego el valor se pone sin unidades. Te deko corregirlo. Gracias y buen mapeo ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87716781
GembDroiD (2020-07-08 18:40:59+00:00): Buenas! Únicamente pretendía cambiar el nombre, nada más. Se pronuncia con una "t" al final (vert), pero la escritura correcta es con "d" (Verd).

Gracias y saludos!
bobeeeze (2020-07-08 18:55:01+00:00): Buenas, acabo de ver que realmente solo has cambiado la t por una d y eso está bien. Pero aprovecho para preguntarte algo (por si conoces la zona). Estoy viendo que según el IGN el nombre del pico es Penya Roja y mide 792m de altura. De hecho hay otro pico que está mapeado justo al lado del pico que has modificado y que tiene el nombre Penyal Roig y con una altura de 789. ¿Sabrías decirme cual de los dos es el correcto?
GembDroiD (2020-07-08 19:09:09+00:00): Pues realmente es una mezcla de las dos cosas. Lo correcto es que el pico se llame "Penyal Roig" y tiene 792m de altura. Lo que se llama "Cavall Verd" es la montaña entera. Lo que aparece en el IGN es una traducción a medias.

Gracias!
bobeeeze (2020-07-08 19:21:03+00:00): Ya he visto que Cavall Verd está puesto cerca como lugar en la falda de la montaña. Así que dejaré solo un pico con la altura de 792m pero me quiero asegurar el nombre de ese pico. Entre Penyal Roig y Penya Roja lo más correcto sería Penyal Roig según tu?
GembDroiD (2020-07-08 19:30:18+00:00): Es como más lo dice la gente aquí en el pueblo (soy de Benigembla), aunque es sinónimo Penyal y Penya.
Jordi MF (2020-07-08 20:18:23+00:00): Visto que Penyal Roig és un topónimo muy extendido (mirando por internet parece que más que el oficial), propongo mantener el pico "Penyal Roig" con la etiqueta "name=Penyal Roig" + "natural=peak" + "ele=792" + "official_name=Penya Roja".

Pero creo que aún hay una duda por resolver con el topónimo "Cavall Verd". Si "Cavall Verd" es una montaña y no la cima, debería etiquetarse como "place=locality" (creo que en OSM no existe una etiqueta específica para hacer referencia a una montaña). Pero si "Cavall Verd" también hace referencia a la cima, añadiría la etiqueta "alt_name=Cavall Verd" a la cima Penyal Roig.
bobeeeze (2020-07-08 21:11:11+00:00): Ya existe un place=locality con el nombre de Cavall Verd. Está en la falda de la montaña
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1242131887
GembDroiD (2020-07-08 21:19:22+00:00): Correcto. Yo lo dejaría así.
bobeeeze (2020-07-08 21:25:07+00:00): Ya he cambiado el pico según tus consejos Jordi. Me parece de momento lo más adecuado. Gracias a vuestros comentarios
GembDroiD (2020-07-08 21:40:34+00:00): Muchas gracias a vosotros.
jimkats (2020-08-06 16:33:15+00:00): Thank you for the edit, it was about time that someone would update the Rio station which moved to its current position more than a year ago.
InsertUser (2020-07-08 17:59:01+00:00): I think your bounding box might be a little larger than you expected here.
Frans S (2020-07-09 10:08:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Fasse (2020-07-21 15:42:29+00:00): Hallo Martin,
bitte schau noch einmal über deinen Changeset drüber, da ist jetzt was im Grenzverlauf kaputt gegangen. Siehe auch ier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2263197#map=15/50.6487/6.1767&layers=N
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-11-23 01:09:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94603516 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic edits in Poland following some requests from the local community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4207 for more details.
Korzun (2020-07-08 15:20:00+00:00): Web browser auto-complete mistake. This change removed an extra space from "Third Avenue"
Asteliks (2020-09-30 17:22:11+00:00): dlaczego zrobiłeś że węzeł: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669392629/history
jest na poziomie -1?
tastrax (2020-09-09 00:30:08+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
UMR_Passages (2020-07-08 15:30:17+00:00): #UMR Passages #Decisif
datendelphin (2020-07-08 18:15:34+00:00): Wäre es nicht besser, das als Spielplatz zu tagen?
PuffinMapper (2020-07-09 05:56:46+00:00): Doch, das ist definitiv richtiger.
Parkplatz verkleinert, Fläche des Platzes abgeklärt und geändert.
datendelphin (2020-07-10 19:04:26+00:00): Vielen Dank :) Sieht gut aus.
Scout Jens (2022-05-24 05:31:27+00:00): Hallo, die Parkplätze sind doch eigentlich straßenseitiges Parken. Findest Du nicht? Viele Grüße, Jens
user_5359 (2020-07-08 17:06:10+00:00): Hello! Short information the standard key for call number ist phone instead telephone.
Harel M (2020-09-05 13:25:39+00:00): Hi,
In image5 tag the link is partial, any chance you can fix this?
hatul (2020-09-05 19:54:12+00:00): fixed
skorasaurus (2020-07-09 20:39:14+00:00): hi,

thanks for editing and welcome to openstreetmap.

As a clevelander and fellow openstreetmap editor, I have a couple suggestions:
- the OSIP 6 inch imagery layer is more  accurate and sharper than maxar.
- You can improve the shape of a building to more closely match what it looks like within the editor, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823995260

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823999339/
are some examples that could be improved. 

Could you clarify what the #bte means? The changeset comments let fellow users know what types of edits were made.

For example, for one of yours, it could be "adding buildings in parma using mapwith.ai"

lastly, if you're a part of an organized group editing, have your leader please review https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

otherwise, great work .

regards,
will
Tomas Straupis (2020-07-09 09:08:14+00:00): Nereikia prirašyti „bankomatas“, tai aišku iš žymos amenity=atm.
O Šiaulių banko šioje vietoj nebėra? Liko tik bankomatas?
Sauliukaz (2020-07-09 11:34:47+00:00): kur įrašiau bankomatas, jeigu kalba eina apie tą vietą tai ten šiaulių banko niekad ir nebuvo. kaip ir priešais SEB bankomatas, nežinau iš kur jie ten atsirado, penki metai aš šalia gyvenu, tai nebuvo. Maxima irgi užsidarė apie metus.
ابراهيم عسيري107 (2022-11-19 22:00:14+00:00): الاسم الجديد  ال حبيب
E de Wit (2020-07-09 07:31:15+00:00): Ah mooi, de namen van Blitsaerd-Oost en Middelsee zijn ook bepaald (nu highway=proposed).
Tevens een mooie onderlegger om Middelsee verder mee voor te bereiden :)
aceman444 (2020-07-16 22:02:02+00:00): Hi, you never responded to our comments on the mess you have done in the past and you dare to come back?
In this one surely the name o the playground is bad (there are no all leading caps in names in Slovak) and there are somehow too many operators. Also the maxweight tag has bad syntax.
At least you now provide good changeset comments.
Carto'Cité (2020-08-11 14:21:47+00:00): Bonjour Clem,
J'ai l'impression que ces rues ne sont pas en DSC en fait. Si tu passes dans le secteur n'hésite pas à regarder :D
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Clem0908 (2020-08-11 16:16:46+00:00): Effectivement je viens de voir que ce n'était pas indiqué... J'ai cru que c'était possible étant donné que les voitures sont limitées à 10 (plus restrictif que la zone de rencontre) mais il faut bien le pannonçeau "Sauf vélo" accroché au sens interdit pour que ce soit officiel
Carto'Cité (2020-08-11 16:47:55+00:00): Très honnêtement je ne suis pas sûr, c'est parfois débattu. Il faudrait intéroger des légalistes mais ensuite il y a le terrain. Comme il s'agit de rue piétonne, j'aurais tendance à préciser dans ce cas particulier oneway:bicycle=no pour éviter de créer un faux double sens cyclable mais c'est un peu la même chose :\
Ce n'est pas critique mais ça fait parti des cas encore mal consolidé en termes de pratiques.
Merci pour ton retour :)
Charles
patman37 (2020-07-10 07:37:08+00:00): Bonjour Romain,
Je ne connais pas bien l'endroit, mais pourquoi avoir transformé une route en voie ferrée ?
Ne serait-ce pas une erreur ?
Cordialement 
Patrick
user_5359 (2020-07-08 17:10:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/4205422648/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
ianlopez1115 (2020-07-09 09:30:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87719591 where the changeset comment is: [Tinglayan] Rolled-back parts of changeset (84107804) because source data license is incompatible with OSM. For details: github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67
ianlopez1115 (2020-07-09 09:32:12+00:00): ^disregard above comment, changeset comment was supposed to be posted in  changeset 84107804
Kovoschiz (2020-07-09 07:20:38+00:00): Please notice the syntax of `vehicle=no` followed by `bus=yes`. To allow non-motorized vehicle, `motor_vehicle=no` can be used
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87720897
Kovoschiz (2020-07-09 08:18:58+00:00): Sorry I should mention these forbid all vehicles, motorized or not
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87720897
jmapb (2020-07-08 16:53:03+00:00): Thanks... and welcome back after 11 years, I think you may have set the OSM hide-and-seek record!
Frans S (2020-07-10 14:09:10+00:00): Hello
fyi, Bing is the standard Imagery for this project.
Thanks for your mapping efforts on this project.
One of by tasks of validator is to review at random mappings of a mapper to check if the mappings are in accordance to the HOTSM quality standards.
From the 114 buildings you mapped on several tasks 108 were reported as not accurate  squared.

This frustrates the job of validators who have to correct all these mappings. It cost so much more time to correct them rather than map them correct in 1 session.
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
BeKri (2020-07-08 23:18:27+00:00): Witzig ...
Wenn ich recht informiert bin
steht das Haus auch bald zum Abriss

https://www.abendzeitung-muenchen.de/inhalt.neues-parkhaus-in-der-altstadt-abriss-6-jahre-baustelle-am-altstadtring.9e0ef73f-a02d-4618-893e-7019bbdae6ca.html

Die mögen das scheinbar ;-)
Stefan@MUC (2020-07-09 20:13:52+00:00): ... vielleicht sind auch die Mieten so günstig ;)

Aber eine Galerie ist ja eh schnell umgezogen, vorallem wenn es eh wechselnde Ausstellungen sind.
BeKri (2020-07-09 21:53:07+00:00): <smile> der ist gut ...
wechselnde Ausstellungen an
wechselnden Ort ....
Demnächst dann die "Pop-Up" Galerie ..

Aber so wird es wohl sein.

Ich wollte da mal hin
(am alten Ort deshalb der Eintrag)
war mir dann aber ab vom Schuss.
Aber jetzt kommt es mal 
auf  den "Nah"-Radar ...
Vielleciht erfahre ich was zur "Immobil"Philosophie ;-)
aceman444 (2020-07-16 22:03:59+00:00): Hi, where does the name "Drahy" come from? You provide not source, only Maxar and Bing imagery where you of course can't see that name. Also notice Bing is quite outdated so try to avoid it for mapping new objects.
Frans S (2020-07-09 14:12:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here,
One of by tasks of validator is to review at random mappings of a mapper to check if the mappings are in accordance to the HOTSM quality standards.
appr 10 % of your mappings are reported  as not squared.  After checking a number of mappings showed me that you indeed  did not square all rectangular buildings

An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
user_4803893 (2020-07-08 17:37:17+00:00): Jest możliwość, że tymczasowo zamknięte z powodu remontu, modernizacji. Będę informował, jeśli punkt stanie się ponownie otwarty.
dpolovinkin (2023-08-14 16:52:43+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed you added a lot of cliffs in green zones to the south from Weimershof, and many of them seem like they have more or less random geometry, which messes things up a bit when you use the map.

Is there a specific geometry which you used to map them and there are real cliffs there or is it more or less random? thx!
dpolovinkin (2023-08-14 17:00:35+00:00): ah, you are in block... okay, maybe can answer later, but I will smoothen and edit some places with really weird geometries
literan (2020-07-09 15:56:29+00:00): а что это за дороги в лесах? подъезды к объектам по обращению с отходами?
zhoogle (2020-07-09 16:47:52+00:00): Да, это подъезды к объектам по обращению с отходами
santamariense (2020-10-24 16:05:09+00:00): Oi magacima,
Em que você se baseou para elevar esta rodovia a trunk?
Recentemente adotamos um padrão onde trunk é definida como A melhor rota entre um par de cidades com mais de 200 mil habintes. É este o caso? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87723323
highflyer74 (2020-12-17 09:29:20+00:00): Hallo jejune und willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte ändere den Namen nicht in etwas, was kein Name ist. Du kannst in StreetComplete einen Hinweis erstellen und ein Bild von der Situation vor Ort machen, damit andere Mapper eine Sache korrigieren können, wenn Du Dir nicht sicher bist.

Jetzt gibt es in OSM einen Doktor namens "it is not doctor", was natürlich nicht richtig ist.

Ich nehme den Namen entsprechend wieder raus und würde Dich bitten, falls Du hier wieder vorbeikommst, ein Bild zu machen und es uns zur Verfügung zu stellen. Danke!
ZLima12 (2020-07-11 07:31:03+00:00): These two points should not be placed. The unnamed "park" point is already mapped as an area. As for "Secret Beach", this is not the actual name of the place. The place does not seem to really exist. If you're referring to the beach that spans Croton Point, that should be mapped as an area if anything, not a point.

I already reverted these edits, but please be hesitant before adding points like this. As for the unnamed park point, check to see if something is already there.

If you ever have a question about whether something should be mapped (or how it should be mapped), feel free to send me a message.
marczoutendijk (2020-08-01 08:53:52+00:00): Hi mackboat,
Could you respond to the questions above?

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
AdVerburg (2020-07-09 06:13:27+00:00): Wanneer ik naar de luchtfoto kijk heeft way 824267024  meer weg van "man_made=pipeline + location=overhead" plus eventueel nog "layer=1" dan van "building". In elk geval dient een oplossing gevonden te worden voor de constructie en de weg(en) en spoorweg(en).
Met vriendelijke groeten, Ad
Jorisbo (2020-07-09 06:26:00+00:00): Hallo Ad, Leuk om iets te horen! Gezien er nog zoveel niet aanwezig  was had ik nu niet gedacht dat iemand het ging merken dat ik er eens wat tijd in zou steken:-) Ik dacht: laat ik eens beginnen met de basis dan kan het daarna weer worden bijgewerkt. Ik veronderstel ook dat de lange stukken allemaal buizen zijn (man_made=pipeline) maar al die buizen samen vormen dan toch ook weer een (technisch) bouwwerk. Ik gebruik de aiv als uitgangspunt, die tekenen het ook zo.. In elk geval zal ik misschien beter de lange stukken 'los tekenen' ipv als een geheel met de fabrieksdelen, dan zijn ze makkelijker om te buigen naar wat anders.Voel je vrij om dingen aan te passen. Daar kan ik prima tegen. Gr Joris
AdVerburg (2020-07-09 07:45:42+00:00): Dag Joris,

Ik werd getriggerd door een osmose-melding "Highway intersecting building" van een weg ter plaatse waar ik eens "aangezeten" had, en jouw gebouw.

Dus onopgemerkt iets doen?, nee dus シ

Wat ook een aanpak kan zijn (voorbeeld) is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490717511#map=17/51.34562/3.75568

De AIV GRB plus AIV luchtfoto gebruik ik ook in Vlaanderen.

Vooralsnog denk ik dat het jouw project is, en mijn bemoeienis niet verder moet gaan dan een paar opmerkingen / adviezen.

Nogmaals gegroet, Ad
ZLima12 (2020-07-11 07:32:32+00:00): There was already a point for Anthony's Nose. It has more detail, and is closer to the actual peak. I already fixed this, but going forward, please double check to see if something like this is already mapped.
ZLima12 (2020-07-11 07:26:31+00:00): Hi,

There are a few issues with this changeset.

First of all, you're not using the right tags for a driveway. in the iD editor, you would want to select the "Driveway" preset. In addition, since these are private driveways, you may also want to specify that. You can use the tag access=private, or by marking the respective field in iD.

I see that to signify that these were driveways, you named it "Driveway". This is not necessary (and should not be done!) if you simply use the correct tags/presets.

It also appears as though you are using Bing Imagery. In this area, Bing Imagery has very poor quality, and is essentially unusable. I have been using NYS Orthos Online, which provides a very high resolution image. In addition, the imagery was taken during the Winter, so you can see through trees.

I actually already submitted a changeset to correct these issues, so you can take a look to see what I mean. If you have any questions, I would be happy to help!
jemily1 (2020-07-08 19:04:23+00:00): ¿la otra mitad del paso peatonal se puede marcar como los pasos peatonales normales?
jemily1 (2020-07-08 19:04:52+00:00): ¿y se puede borrar el que había hecho yo?
Jordi MF (2020-07-08 22:08:46+00:00): Sí, la otra mitad del paso peatonal se haría como los pasos peatonales normales.

No hace falta borrar lo que habías hecho tú. La calle peatonal estaba bien dibujada y solo he modificado el final que "tocaba" el paso de peatones.
Paulvarry (2020-08-12 07:26:38+00:00): There is not a formally parking alley here
vogelfreier (2020-08-20 11:30:13+00:00): after the aerial photo it seemed to me that 2 cars can park there, lengthwise away from the residential street.From there I decided for a larger area and thus not over osmose a kind of error would come, because of floating parking areas, I drew in service road. It would be a bit different, if it was only a strip on car width along a street, so parking_space, then I would have left out the service road.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
emvee (2020-09-03 13:54:42+00:00): Hallo Jillis,

Ik dacht, ik kan nog een Note open maar toen ik zag dat jij de Lundlaan in deze changeset had gewijzigd, dacht ik, laat ik het op deze manier proberen.

Het gaat om https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7006800 en dat met name hoe het met fietstoegang zit. 

Op dit moment staat er "bicycle=designated" en "cycleway:right=opposite", Dat laatste is waarschijnlijk toegevoegd omdat je in twee richtingen mag fietsen terwijl voor ander verkeer het eenrichtingsverkeer is.

Als dat zo is dan kan het allemaal veel simpeler, cycleway:right=opposite vervangen door oneway:bicycle=no.

Weet jij nog hoe het met fietstoegang zit?

Groeten,

Martin.
Jillis inactivE (2020-09-03 14:15:53+00:00): Hoi Martin,

Nee, niet op gelet. Maar ik denk dat je gelijk hebt.

Jillis
VictorIE (2020-09-04 23:21:10+00:00): "Update to remove makey-upey names added to routes" - these are bona fide names that were applied to the roads before the M18 was joined up.