piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_6110846 (2022-10-26 14:12:04+00:00): https://sarny-rada.gov.ua/dokumenti/rishennja-radi/viii-sklikannja/14-pozachergova-sesija-vid-19-veresnja-2022-roku/8526-959-vid-19-veresnja-2022-roku-pro-perejmenuvannja-isnujuchih-vulic-ta-provulkiv-na-teritoriji-sarnenskoji-miskoji-teritorialnoji-gromadi.html
weblogdryads (2026-05-17 00:16:38+00:00): a lot of these building outlines are wrong and misaligned.
fndoder (2022-10-26 17:16:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107114746

Эту матрицу из 50 линий-заготовок, похоже, случайно отправил.
Глеб (2022-10-27 06:22:13+00:00): Добрый день! Да, случайно, прошу не удалять, это нужно временно для расстановки адресов.
fndoder (2022-10-27 06:25:52+00:00): Понял.
ОК.
HellMap (2022-11-12 17:38:26+00:00): Hello again,

I see you changed the ways between  Ceļinieku and Gaujienas from cycleways to just a foot paths. But they do have the 417 traffic sign "kopīgs gājēju un velosipēdu ceļš" at both ends, so they were correctly tagged as highway=cycleway. Even though they are terrible in real-life and signs are not properly repeated along them, they are legally cycleways.

I changed them back to cycleways.

For info on tagging such paths see and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddesignated
bxl-forever (2022-10-26 16:24:21+00:00): Hello,

At first I thought it was either somebody testing how to use OSM or a fantasy edit.  Because mostly all tags or geometries are wrong here.

Could you please tell what is going on in this street, and possibly provide a link to information about this road block.  So that we know the situation in order to clean up the map.

Thanks.
eggie (2022-10-26 15:11:40+00:00): Beste Pieter

highway=pedestrian wordt gebruikt in winkelgebied en voetgangersgebied in winkelstraten.
Dat kan middels borden opengezet worden voor ander verkeer.. bv bicycle=yes  Staat dat hier aangegeven. Hildo Kropstraat PC Hoofdstraat.? 
Wanneer er een G7 bord staat gebruiken we highway=footway
Meestal staat daar geen bicycle=yes bij.
Geen bebording dan highway=path gebruiken.

MVG
eggie
rhtb0 (2022-10-27 07:49:09+00:00): 변경집합 댓글을 작성해 주세요. 오픈스트리트맵 위키에 따르면 바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 작성하라고 나와 있습니다. 귀찮으면 대충이라도 적어주세요.

편집 내용을 설명하기 위해 바뀜집합 댓글을 사용해야 하는 이유는 아래와 같습니다.
다른 사람들에게 무엇을 변경했는지 대답해 주면서 시간을 쓸 필요가 없어진다.
무엇을 편집했는지, 왜, 언제 편집했는지 기억하는 데 도움을 준다.
왜 어떤 일을 했는지, 출처가 무엇인지 설명하여 편집 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지한다. 누군가가 당신이 항공 사진에 보이지 않는 집을 추가했다는 것을 발견하면 그것을 삭제하고 싶은 유혹을 받을 수 있지만, 자신의 바뀜집합 댓글에 "새로 건설된 건물이 추가되었습니다"라고 적으면 두 번 생각할 것이다.
본인이 편집한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있다. 댓글을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 무엇을 왜 했는지는 당신이 신경 쓸 일이 아니다" 라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고 있는 프로젝트와 적합하지 않다.
오해를 피하고 실수를 빠르게 고칠 수 있다.
1998alexkane (2023-06-26 10:16:06+00:00): Was adding access=private to this part of Jeffery Boulevard a mistake?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57006954
plennert (2022-10-27 11:18:40+00:00): Hallo Fabian,
willkommen bei osm. Ist die kein Gebäude mehr?

Viele Grüsse
plennert
plennert (2022-10-31 14:55:34+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

nimmst Du dich der Sache nochmals an?
Mfg
Metzor (2023-10-12 06:02:18+00:00): Hallo Fabian,

Ich habe deinen Fehler nun repariert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121619919

Gar nicht auf Diskussionen zu antworten ist nicht die feine Art! Siehe auch dein neuster Änderungssatz... Zumal du um "Review" bittest und genügend Fehler in deinen Änderungssätzen sind.

Viele Grüße 
Metzor
Fabian007 (2023-12-09 13:15:03+00:00): Sehr geehrte plennert und Metzor, sorry, ich habe es leider vergessen.sorry, das ich erst nach einen Jahr schreibe, den ich habe leider 2 Accounts drinnen und deshalb konnte ich auf ihrer Frage leider nicht antworten. Bitte auf meinen richtigen Account schreiben, sonst kann ich ihrer Frage nicht antworten. Sorry! 

Ich wünsche ihnen noch einen schönen 2. Atwend Woche ihnen noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
uvi (2023-12-27 14:07:53+00:00): Hallo Fabian, 
einige deiner Änderungen werfen bei anderen Mitwirkenden Fragen auf. Im Moment gibt es dazu unter https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/troll-oder-unwillig-oder/107364 eine rege Diskussion. Ich möchte dich gerne dahin ein laden. 
Keine Angst! Jeder hat einmal angefangen und Fehler passieren auch mir nach vielen Jahren des Mitwirkens noch. 
Wichtig ist immer: Richtige Daten, korrekte Schreibweisen und saubere Quellen. 
Tipps für die ersten Schritte gibt es zum Beispiel unter learnosm.org. Hilfe gibt es unter community.openstreetmap.org .
Übrigens sind wir hier bei OSM alle per "Du", egal wie alt wir sind (Wenn ich dein Profilbild sehe, denke ich, ich könnte fast dein Opa sein ;) ) 
Also keine Scheu - wir helfen gerne und freuen uns auf dich und deine Mitwirkung bei OSM.
Viele Grüße 
Uwe
Fabian007 (2023-12-28 19:53:20+00:00): Hallo uvi,
Ah ok. Das auf den Bild bin ich zu sehen, wo ich gerade eben den Bild entfernt habe, sodass ich bald ein neues Bild reinstelle. Sorry! Es ist ok, das wir mit per du ansprechen. Denn sonst hätte ich weiterhin per Sie gesprochen. Jetzt weiß ich bescheid, und werde diesen Link mal in Ruhe durchlesen, wenn es okay wäre. Aber auch danke nochmals für den Link! 

Ich wünsche dir noch einen wunderschönen Abend noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
Fabian007 (2023-12-28 19:54:21+00:00): 

Hallo uvi,
Ah ok. Das auf den Bild bin ich zu sehen, wo ich gerade eben den Bild entfernt habe, sodass ich bald ein neues Bild reinstelle kann. Sorry! Es ist ok, das wir mit per du ansprechen. Denn sonst hätte ich weiterhin per Sie gesprochen. Jetzt weiß ich bescheid, und werde diesen Link mal in Ruhe durchlesen, wenn es okay wäre. Aber auch danke nochmals für den Link!

Ich wünsche dir noch einen wunderschönen Abend noch!

MFG Fabianbuecheler
MarinoBM (2022-10-26 22:55:33+00:00): ¿Por qué debo comentar el conjunto de cambios?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Nzau (2023-01-03 21:58:17+00:00): Re solcarlus,

J'ai modifié ce que tu avais fait sur l'arrêt de bus Colline aux oiseaux, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6652213433/history en effet tu avait décaler la plateforme sur la route et enlever la relation du bus à l'arrêt de bus principal. De même avec l'arrêt de Nashville.

Si tu as des questions n'hésite pas et si je me trompes fait moi signe également,
Nzau.
Mannivu (2022-10-26 18:06:28+00:00): Attenzione che indicare "access=no" significa che non ci può entrare nessuno. Se l'accesso è esclusivo alle biciclette nel caso di una Cycleway non è necessario indicare nulla (l'horse=no va bene, invece)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128090637
bxl-forever (2022-10-26 23:50:51+00:00): Hello,

The tags on this traffic island look a bit strange.

crossing:island is used on crossing nodes to specify whether people should expect an island somewhere (typically in the middle of a very large road, and when it is mapped very basically as a single road in OSM).  The wiki disallows this tag on areas.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island

I thought you might want to have a second look.

Hope this helps.
Cortix (2025-11-10 22:46:37+00:00): Ciao, la numerazione N1 da dove deriva? In loco non si trova alcun riferimento numerico!

Perché hai creato dunque queste relazioni così numerate?
Marek-M (2022-10-26 18:04:46+00:00): Cześć, skąd masz info o tej drodze objazdowej w Miszewie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106300396 - interesuje mnie to ze względu na to, że często tędy jeżdżę a rysując OMT z projektu tej drogi tam nie było. Posiadasz może jakiś projekt tymczasowej organizacji ruchu w tym rejonie?
Szymson (2022-10-26 18:53:00+00:00): Hej, jest to zaznaczone tutaj: https://www.metropolitalna-zadanie1.pl/0e18860652e9dc194f59f3ec72c66d03/ark_0209a.pdf
Szymson (2022-10-26 18:54:23+00:00): Objazd oznaczony jest jasnoszarym kolorem, najlepiej widać go między budowanym obwodem utrzymania drogi a obecną DK20
Marek-M (2022-10-26 20:02:21+00:00): Dzięki! Możliwe, że masz rację, że te szare linie mogą być jakimś objazdem roboczym aczkolwiek w legendzie i w opisach nic o tym nie napisali. Zobaczymy jak zaczną kopać czy tam faktycznie coś powstanie, na razie cisza przed burzą :)
Nzau (2023-01-03 20:31:46+00:00): Re solcarlus5, 

Je crois que tu as fais quelques petites erreurs avec les oneways, en effet un chemin piéton et très rarement amené à être en sens unique, je me permets donc de rectifier cela sur le chemin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674104883/history
Par ailleurs, aucun panneau n'indique que les vélos sont les bienvenus sur le chemin piéton longeant l'Av. du Général Dempsey https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233726300 je rectifie également.

A ta disposition au besoin,
Nzau.
Carto'Cité (2023-03-13 08:28:51+00:00): Bonjour frutruc,

Est-ce que tu peux me confirmer que tu as bien observé une signalétique sur le terrain qui précise que cette portion de la Rue du Demi Cercle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399098540) est bien à Double Sens Cyclable ? Car la configuration est curieuse, le DSC aboutirait sur un cul de sac en termes de possibilité pour les cyclistes car la suite de la rue n'est soit pas cyclables soit pas en DSC (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260721814 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399098539). Même si la rue est en zone 30 il faut une signalétique explicite pour cartographier un DSC alors j'ai un doute.
Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
frutruc (2023-03-13 10:48:53+00:00): Bonjour Charles,
Le DSC est bien signalé ppanneau sens interdit sauf vélo est bien présent. Je l'avais constaté sur place et il est sur google street maps :
https://goo.gl/maps/GL8d16qFeGedeY8p6
Carto'Cité (2023-03-13 10:53:31+00:00): Merci pour ton retour. Dans ce cas il manque une portion en DSC, justement celle identifiée sur la photo. Je l'ajoute.
Charles
Frans S (2022-11-19 10:23:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please focus on main roads as requested in the instructions.
You (and other mappers) mapped here many traces, sometimes hardly visible and tagged them all as highway=unclassified.
A bit overdone.
Please take that into account at future mappings.
Best regards
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-27 15:44:36+00:00): Ciao. Per quanto riguarda https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10130657286 o è un wayside_shrine o è un chapel. Non può essere entrambi. Dato che c'è un edificio probabilmente è una chapel: "A chapel building is different from a wayside shrine in that it is possible to enter it, as it typically has a proper roof and either a door or a doorway without door. It's different from a church in that it is usually much smaller and there's typically usually only room for one person (or maybe a small group)". Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128092347
HellMap (2022-10-26 19:15:39+00:00): Hi!

These structures do not look like buildings: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1166353293788990&focus=photo

What did you mean to fix with this edit?

`historic=memorial` is probably wrong and should be around the whole area. But these look like (retaining) walls.
HellMap (2022-10-27 17:20:52+00:00): You tagged more of these as buildings (changesets 128132917 and 128132992). Can you please clarify what you are trying to do? These are clearly not buildings.
richlv (2022-11-10 20:00:24+00:00): Sveiki Leicha, liels prieks par kartes papildinājumiem.
Būtu ļoti derīgi atbildēt uz HellMap komentāriem te un pie citām izmaiņu kopām - vai būs iespēja drīzumā pārlūkot komentārus un atbildēt uz tiem?

Liels paldies par datu papildināšanu :)
Leicha (2022-11-11 14:39:04+00:00): Hello, sorry for late reply. Im trying to map the structures around the cemetery. Maybe im using the wrong description. I didnt find in the osm.com webpage catalouge the one i needed (wall or smtng like that) so used buildings as i saw that somewhere it was used like that too. If im using wrong description please fix it or name the correct one to use there
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=950984829005210&focus=photo&lat=57.539636436903&lng=25.433285320201&z=17
https://www.google.com/maps/@57.5399356,25.4333328,114m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=lv
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRQeCbs1UhDtAvms0vaN2nen9iCoD0LWfKcew&usqp=CAU
HellMap (2022-11-11 15:21:32+00:00): Thanks for getting back! And thanks for changing the features.

Yeah, not everything has a tag. And the default openstreetmap.org editor iD does not have all of them. Sometimes things need custom values or even new values.

I think `barrier=retaining_wall` matches the primary purpose here. These do look like how retaining walls usually look. There is a lower area and a higher area and the wall is there to stop the soil (or any structures on it) from collapsing. So it's probably just a thick and decorative (retaining) wall here.

If these have additional features, then those can be mapped as additions, for example Soviet-style reliefs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:artwork_type%3Drelief . iD will not have such very specific things. Places like this usually are harder to map and you have to search the wiki and other similar examples (assuming they are correct). If all else fails, you can always use a generic `man_made` tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:man_made or leave an OSM note (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes) of `fixme` tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme) for someone else to correct.

But yeah - I think these should not be buildings. In general, you should be able to enter a building. Of course, the world has 1000 exceptions, but in general if you saw a building on the map, you would expect to see a human-sized structure with some sort of inside area. There are some exceptions like `building=ruins` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Druins which is why I asked you about this area - I haven't been here, so it could have been all sorts of things.

Also, I should mention that we should never use Google or other unfree maps to verify anything. See 
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#Can_I_copy_from_google_or_other_similar_sources? Mapillary is of course okay and made for using for this.

P. S. Your locale is set to `en-US` so I used English, but I can reply in Latvian/Russian.
blacx (2023-02-19 00:14:59+00:00): No fagis servir la capa de satel·lit per dibuixar edificis, esta totalment descuadrada, fes servir la de Catastro
osmviborg (2022-10-27 06:33:50+00:00): Where the outer line of a ghost island is dotted, it is allowed to cross. Revertet.
rowcherryrow (2022-10-27 22:06:09+00:00): Thank you for clarifying that dotted lines on roads on ghost islands allow turns.
21Bede (2022-11-03 15:18:33+00:00): Hi, if the telephone is no longer present, shouldn't the amenity tag be removed?
Hufkratzer (2022-10-26 20:06:53+00:00): Hi,
you have tagged
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107141145
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107141146
with leisure=horse_riding. This tag is for riding centres (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding) but in the aerial view they look more like typical riding arenas; and riding arenas should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena).
eggie (2022-10-26 17:08:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Je hebt de Souting verwijderd en wat geschoven met de adresnodes.
Wat is je bedoeling?.. Dan kunnen we helpen. 
Adresnode 2 heb ik hersteld. 



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-26 17:16:42+00:00): Basisschool en buurthuis toegevoegd aan adresnodes.
Ik zie nog een kampvuurplaats.. Klopt dat nog wel?
Groet
eggie
AngocA (2023-12-22 22:10:57+00:00): Hola

No entiendo para que poner esta área residencial - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107147727/history, si está lleno de bodegas y otros comercios. Puede que el uso del terreno no sea el apropiado, pero en OSM se mapeo lo que se ve en terreno.
Barto920203 (2023-12-22 22:35:03+00:00): Solo bastsa con darse un paseo en Street Viwe y ver que el área es en su mayoría residencial:
https://www.google.com/maps/@4.7738988,-74.0408941,3a,75y,95h,96.83t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sy_aJSK-fItQ57PW3BUaCtg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu

https://www.google.com/maps/@4.7749231,-74.0409411,3a,75y,143.47h,100.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sFs_-lq5sRD9RKFK5jOYVTw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
AngocA (2023-12-23 15:39:17+00:00): Precisamente en esos lugares se ven bastantes comercios. Y basta ver que hay muchos comercios o áreas industriales. Residencial barrios como el Chicó, Pablo VI, o Los Laches, donde predominan las viviendas y hay uno que otro comercio de cercanías, más no bodegas, industrias.
Hay que tener en cuenta: "An area of land having predominantly residential buildings such as houses or apartment buildings." Y en esa área hay muchas bodegas.
El área llega hasta el concesionario BMW, y ahí solo hay bodegas, con un eventual segundo piso residencial, muy seguramente para vigilancia.
https://www.google.com/maps/@4.776472,-74.0411702,3a,75y,342.01h,101.98t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1seCF1g0AXgrlyuLQs7v7Pjw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DeCF1g0AXgrlyuLQs7v7Pjw%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D143.9332%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
Realmente mapear áreas residenciales, por que sí no tiene valor. Te recomiendo leas el wiki y agregues cosas que den más valor al mapa de Bogotá, como las construcciones, los POIs, etc, en vez de llenar la ciudad de áreas.
AngocA (2023-12-23 16:26:01+00:00): Y también te recomiendo mejorar el comentario al momento de guardar, ya que "detalles" no indica nada.

Échale un ojo al wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2022-10-26 22:01:54+00:00): Even ter Leering ende Vermaeck..  Hier kun je zien hoe je gebouwen kunt laten importeren.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/120

Mapse
eggie
kvdveer (2022-10-27 13:53:21+00:00): Dank. Ik zie dat je het nieuwe politiebureau al heb laten importeren. Ik zal de bouw ervan verder in de gaten houden. Er komen vast nog wel wat straatjes en parkeerplaatsen bij.
eggie (2022-10-27 14:17:50+00:00): Oke...  Je bent goed bezig. .. en gestart met JOSM nu.
Mocht je vragen hebben aarzel niet. 
Vergeet niet om concreet commentaar toe te voegen bij je uploads. 
Bv details toegevoegd aan schuurtjes ipv local survey..   Lokale mappers kijken vaak mee en willen dat weten wat je hebt gedaan.

Succes,
eggie


Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-10-27 14:22:06+00:00): Hier zie je wie nog meer mappen in jouw gebied voor evt overleg.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=14&lat=51.84085&lon=4.68709&layers=B0

Je staat er zelf ook al tussen.
bxl-forever (2022-10-27 00:12:00+00:00): Hello,

I am afraid this is not correct.
The tags you added will not make any difference: it will not show up on any layer of the map and I don’t thing any single app will understand them.

They are rebuilding some part of the area, indeed; I remember adjusting the torn down building along Av. de la Couronne/Kroonlaan.

But adding construction=track to some roads is very strange.

"track" is used for forest paths like this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Tracktype_grade3.jpg

And the "construction" key is only used if the highway type itself is set to "construction" (so that tags can be chained).  And is reserved for new roads built out of nowhere, never to be used when there are reconstruction works to improve a situation.

If you feel that notifying everyone that there are some works going out in Usquare is important, I might suggest drawing an area (to be tagged as landuse=construction): either a large area covering the relevant part of Usquare, or several small areas, for instance large rectangles around every street.

If you do that, just make sure you regularly follow how the works are going on, to be sure to remove the construction areas from the map when they are done.

Have a nice day.
Noudejans (2022-10-27 10:56:11+00:00): Thanks for your extensive answer. OSM is hard when you begin with it. I agree better to leave it as it is. I however have no idea how I can delete my proposed chnages (/change set). Can you hint me?
bxl-forever (2022-10-27 12:43:53+00:00): Don’t worry, I did it, it was easy to undo.
Noudejans (2022-10-27 13:10:17+00:00): thank you
GUFSZ (2023-01-24 06:35:51+00:00): Doofe Frage, gibt es noch explizite Routen in Frankfurt, nachdem alles zu einem einzigen Wegenetz vermanscht worden ist.
Soll heißen, ist die Namensgebung der Route überhaupt (noch) richtig?
BasicMaster18 (2023-01-24 16:53:05+00:00): Ob der Name stimmt, weiß ich nicht; der Weg ist jedenfalls explizit entlang der Strecke über ein Symbol (Goethe-Kopf aus dem Logo der Goethe-Uni) ausgeschildert, das unter dem passenden Richtungspfeil bei den Radnetzwegweisern hängt.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-27 07:08:36+00:00): Jei amenity=public_building kažkuo netinka, tai reikia dėti kokią nors kitą tinkamesnę žymą, o ne tiesiog palikti be žymos kaip eilinį pastatą. Tam kartui grąžinsiu iki to amenity=public_building.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-27 07:09:08+00:00): A, sorry, matau, community_centre uždėta. Tada nieko :-)
mcconner22 (2023-01-21 04:57:24+00:00): There was a disconnected path south of the Archery Field at Camp Agawam (Path #1107157074) added in this changeset. Do you know what it should be connected to?
Trail_Caretaker (2023-01-23 23:21:33+00:00): I don't see the archery field when I clicked on the link you sent me, and when I typed the word "archery" into the search field it took me somewhere other than this map.  I am willing to talk though.
pitfire (2022-10-27 04:33:50+00:00): Hallo Rotluchs1,
ist das real ein einzeln stehendes Einfamilienhaus, oder doch eher nur eine Garage?
Mordechai23 (2022-10-26 20:05:18+00:00): Mini Kostol, dobre ;)
kapazao (2022-10-27 12:03:28+00:00): Si hay una fila de árboles en la zona tampoco tienes que quitarlos, pueden estar ambas cosas :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128096172
Pipeton (2022-10-27 12:37:42+00:00): No los he considerado árboles, son muy pequeños.
MarksPhotoTrips (2022-10-27 15:23:29+00:00): The usual recommendation for a case like this is to mark the paths in question as "private". Someone else can come along and add them back if they choose.

From the openstreetmap wiki 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
"it is also considered fine to map existing road/paths, if using them is forbidden use access=no/access=private rather than deleting them"
The same comment applies to the other changeset of yours.
Samantha McCann (2022-10-27 19:37:06+00:00): If we're trying to restore the path so that there is no path, then is it okay to delete?
MarksPhotoTrips (2022-10-28 15:22:02+00:00): Ah ok. That does change things. Let's let the changes stand. Should someone add them back, then the appropriate changes to the paths can be made.
MarksPhotoTrips (2022-10-28 15:25:28+00:00): Oh, and thank you for clarifying!
Samantha McCann (2022-10-28 15:31:13+00:00): No problem! Thanks for helping me understand the other options!
luin132 (2022-10-26 18:16:20+00:00): I divided a section of primary road as well.
gektor1488 (2022-11-29 15:51:21+00:00): please, do not map military objects during the war in Ukraine
traveleditor (2022-10-27 07:27:09+00:00): Hello, if you want to switch to edit in a different country, please upload your changeset first. Thanks
SekeRob (2022-10-27 09:47:51+00:00): OR, as JOSM allows, upload each object separately: Upload screen > Settings tab > "Upload each object individually" radio button,

Di niente

Almost Too Simple.
one_half_3544 (2022-10-27 11:20:25+00:00): Are you guys from the club of 'witnesses of the smallest bbox possible'?
SekeRob (2022-10-27 11:48:04+00:00): We (me at least) also witnesses that your JOSM version is 18463 where the latest stable tested is 18570. 😎

PS, it's curious that at least 4 of your springs are corners of the same building, so was it springs you did or something else too ;P).