piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dieterdreist (2024-08-21 14:40:09+00:00): > In historical parts of cities, similar to Fabriano, such areas tend to be officially pedestrian.

I somehow agree that it many European countries this is the case, but the Fabriano example as well as many other towns in central Italy demonstrate, it does not have to be like this. If there isn't a sign for footway or a pedestrian area on a narrow street in an urban setting in Italy, it means it isn't reserved to pedestrians and you can legally ride your motorbike there (unless it is in a ZTL area, which may have their own rules for a whole area, but are signed at the entrances).
dieterdreist (2024-08-21 14:41:39+00:00): In Germany the usual situation is clear signage. Also there is much less two-wheeled non-bicycle traffic (very narrow streets in Germany would also usually forbid bicycles)
Tchiller (2016-07-11 15:28:47+00:00): but there are exits, no? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit
smaprs (2015-02-23 21:39:16+00:00): Estrada e vários elementos não correspondem às imagem de satélite Bing e Mapbox. Necessita confirmação ou ajuste.
ljc_jlyb (2023-01-14 06:44:40+00:00): nice number(
Arma IRM-ED (2020-12-08 03:44:08+00:00): Hi, webrian. I have adjusted the trunk road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/38040944) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
eggie (2021-04-23 18:22:36+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-21 02:48:15+00:00): Hi Beddhist. Your edit looks awesome, but there's an issue with footway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/38106546) and (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/38106548) due crossing with water body. Would you mind to recheck and fix the issue, please? If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143788453). Thank you.
GerdP (2015-11-09 05:59:07+00:00): please review: I've changed the tag
highway=stepping_stones to 
highway=path
and added a 
ford=stepping_stones 
See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35105253
This change was also discussed here as an example for a "bad change" causing "data loss", so please let me know what you think about it:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-November/074913.html
See also 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford
Peter Dobratz (2016-08-30 20:27:49+00:00): Can you elaborate on where the name "Minnesota Freeway" comes from?
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-30 21:00:15+00:00): Minnesota Freeway comes from Oregon DOT, after Minnesota Avenue.
Peter Dobratz (2016-08-30 22:38:11+00:00): The reason I ask is that an anonymous user posted a note last year saying that the "Minnesota Freeway" name was wrong.  There were a few users that agreed, but not action was taken to change the data prior to closing the note.

I'm poking around on the ODOT site to see if I can find anything:
http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/
Peter Dobratz (2016-08-30 22:55:30+00:00): The ODOT "Moving Ahead" newsletter from September 2006 contains a trivia question (page 6):

"Which portion of the interstate was once known as Minnesota Freeway?"

http://www.odotmovingahead.com/2006/09/

I can't find the official answers to these trivia questions, but just the question alone would seem to suggest we use "old_name=Minnesota Freeway" instead of "name=Minnesota Freeway"
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-31 05:15:28+00:00): Probably worth keeping as the name=* for now until we know when it stopped being called that, if ever.
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-31 05:16:10+00:00): And maybe harass OreDOT for their insufficient signage, a statewide problem.
pdxrider (2016-09-02 02:35:43+00:00): Traffic reporters and people around here aren't calling it the Minnesota Freeway anymore, just I-5. Worth tossing it into old_name. Minnesota Freeway isn't signed anywhere along that stretch. I could only see that name used in historical records. I have an answer with more detail in the OSM PDX mailing list.
Peter Dobratz (2016-09-02 02:47:32+00:00): I'll write up a wiki page with the rationale behind the tagging.
Baloo Uriza (2016-09-02 05:55:47+00:00): That's a pretty recent thing on that then, Roadgeek; I remember KPOJ and KEX would refer to it by name for brevity's sake as recently as 2012 when I was last in the area.
GerdP (2023-08-17 15:04:34+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ist ja schon lange her, dass Du diese Routen erfasst hast. Weisst Du, ob die noch immer ausgeschildert sind bzw. wie? Siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/routen-relationen-radweg-hunxe-f-konnen-die-weg/102403/1
Roebuck (2023-08-20 08:11:37+00:00): Moin aus Uplengen!
Ja, es ist schon lange her, dass ich Hünxe in OSM erfasst habe. 
Ich wohne seit 2 Jahren nicht mehr in Hünxe und kann leider nicht "mal einfach" nachschauen.
GerdP (2023-08-20 08:16:08+00:00): Danke für Rückmeldung! Du kannst Dich also auch nicht erinnern, wie damals die Route markiert war? Damals gab es ja wahrscheinlich noch nicht diese Einschubtafeln an Radwegweisern, sondern vielleicht nur Aufkleber an Pfosten oder so was?
Roebuck (2023-08-20 12:22:13+00:00): An die Art der Beschilderung der Fahrradrouten kann ich  mich echt nicht mehr erinnern. Aber sie waren ziemlich klar und gut zu sehen und zu fotografieren.  (Die Fotos von den Mapping-Streifzügen durch Hünxe habe ich damals schon kurzfristig gelöscht. Speicher auf der Digicam war klein und teuer.) 
Die Markierungen der Autofahrer-Wanderwege (A*) sind teils schwer zu entdecken, zugewachsen oder ganz weg.
Die F-Routen waren einfach zu navigieren. Außerdem waren sie verzeichnet auf http://www.freizeit-karte.de/ Diese Web-Seite ist aber möglicherweise tot.
Siehe auch mein alter Eintrag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/H%C3%BCnxe/Status/Radwege

Meine OSM-Touren waren viele Jahre vor dem "NRW-Radwegenetz" mit den numerierten Kreuzungspunkten und mit Karten. Vielleicht hat man die älteren Routen und Beschilderungen ja auslaufen lassen.
GerdP (2023-08-20 12:51:55+00:00): OK, danke für die Infos.
Владимир К (2016-04-13 14:24:06+00:00): Что значит глухой пруд на точке приёма мусора?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 12:41:55+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you mapped as shop=internet in this edit ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)

It is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/450517322/history
Carto'Cité (2022-01-13 10:14:51+00:00): Bonjour codo93,
J'ai supprimé le access=agricultural sur ces chemins https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34724230 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34724230 car je pense qu'ils ne sont pas uniquement accessibles aux véhicules agricoles si j'en crois les traces Strava par exemple. Je corrige dans ce sens. N'hésite pas si tu as la moindre question.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
pangoSE (2023-08-17 14:13:38+00:00): hej, vill du släppa koordinaterna till det här vindskyddet som cc0 så jag kan skapa ett objekt i WD?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/450705612/history
AndersAndersson (2023-08-17 15:04:40+00:00): Absolut. Allt jag har lagt in i OSM får du använda som du vill utan någon hänvisning till mig.
Enda kravet jag har är att inga lögner om datan förekommer. Varför det nu skulle göra det. :)
eggie (2017-10-19 09:05:09+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
kuhni74 (2022-07-27 00:46:27+00:00): Is it possible that Pizzo Cassana and Punta Cassana should be named the other way round? The one in the north-west should be Piz Cassana (with elevation 3070m, by the way) and the one in the south-east should be Punta Cassana, according to the Swiss Topo Map 25 and wikidata. May I ask you to check in the CTR10000 data base?
kaitu (2022-07-27 07:49:54+00:00): I checked with Josm and the current CTR imagery layer:

Lombardia - Italy (CTR DBT)

and the names are still there  as they are currently in OSM. 

So, either Swiss Topo or Lombardy CTR are wrong, or italians and swiss assign names differently (also possible) and both maps are correct in their own perspective. 

I wouldn't blind trust the CTR, have no experience with Swiss Topo.

I checked the general meaning of the attribute "Cima" and "Punta" against the elevation model. According to this explanation of the terms:

https://www.facebook.com/naturalmindprofessional.it/posts/pizzo-punta-cima-e-montequale-la-differenzain-generale-una-prima-differenza-tra-/649405018808074/

a "Pizzo" should be somewhat steeper and sharp, while a "Cima" has a flat surface where it is easy to stand. 

According to that definition, the current situation should be correct. But the differences are subtle, and don't follow rigorous definitions.

I think local knowledge is needed here. Unfortunately I have none.
kuhni74 (2022-07-27 08:13:36+00:00): Thank you very much for checking and for the explanations of mountain terms. Note that we are not talking about "cime", but "punte" vs. "pizzi".
Meanwhile, I found an interesting note on https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piz_Chaschauna: "Für Verwirrung sorgt, dass auf der Karte des Militärgeographischen Instituts Florenz der italienische Name des Berges (Pizzo Cassana) fälschlicherweise dem Gipfelpunkt der benachbarten Punta Casana (3007 m s.l.m.) zugeordnet ist. „Punta Cassana“ ist stattdessen am Gipfelpunkt dieses Berges vermerkt, die Bezeichnungen sind also vertauscht." In English, this means:
What is confusing is that on the map of the Istituto geografico militare Firenze, the Italian name of the mountain (Pizzo Cassana) is mistaken for the summit of nearby Punta Casana (3007 m s.l.m.), whereas „Punta Cassana“ is set on the summit of this peak [Piz Chaschauna], so that the names are swapped."
As a source, the wikipedia article refers to Renato Armelloni: Alpi Retiche. Guida dei monti d’Italia. Vol. 32, Club Alpino Italiano, Milano 1997, ISBN 88-365-0974-6, pp. 234. And the wikipedia article also mentions that the "Firenze style" is being used on OSM, too ;-)
kaitu (2022-07-27 09:31:16+00:00): Yep,  I wrote Cima where I should have written Punta, my mistake.

Interesting the explanation in de.wikipedia. I surely trust the CAI guide referenced better than the italian military map, and I checked on hikers sites that this is the accepted version.

The italian military map can be displayed in Josm using this wms url:
http://wms.pcn.minambiente.it/ogc?map=/ms_ogc/WMS_v1.3/raster/IGM_25000.map

and it can be seen that the story is true. But as it's copyright material, we cannot import it in OSM, irrespective that it is wrong.

I switched the names and added the swiss name version to alt_name for completion (no priority involved, reverse it to name if you like so). Not sure if Piz Chaschauna shuould be name:de or name:gsw though, I think you're better qualified to decide.

As OSM is not Firenze style anymore, could you amend the wikipedia article accordingly?
kaitu (2022-07-27 09:34:53+00:00): As a side note:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557613939

and

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686458282

are not connected to the 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557613942

Can't really tell as I don't know the places, but it doesn't sound right to me.
kuhni74 (2022-07-27 11:59:48+00:00): Okay, thank you very much for the changes! What I forgot to ask before: Are you sure it's "Cassana" and not just "Casana"?
I used "name:de" and "name:rm" with "Piz Chaschauna", since it's not really German, but I'd like to point out the original language. I'm not too familiar with the Swiss German OSM custom, but as far as I understand, name:gsw should only be used for the Swiss dialect version of genuine German names (not names from other languages).
Technically, I'm rather an OSM beginner (I came over from wikipedia) and still work "manually" with iD, so I don't have any clue about how to import other data or work with JOSM, sorry. But I'm aware of the copyright issues. I often refer to (>100 years) old maps in individual cases (no mass editing) and enter the source to the object.
As concerns the "loose" paths around Punta Casana, I think that this was done by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9190916705. The (Europa-widely extremely active) user FvGordon argued that he was repairing self-intersecting ways (most of his edits have been like that during the past weeks). I'm going to ask him. I don't know the places, too (I'm based in Vienna, Austria), I was just doing WikiCommons work (mountain puzzles), which mostly means the necessity for OSM maintenance as well - and the hours fly... ;-)
kuhni74 (2022-07-27 12:33:17+00:00): I just amended the WP-DE article and added wikidata talks on https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Talk:Q7199830 and https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Talk:Q31659903 Usually, there is very little traffic on wikidata talk pages - just in case somebody asks.
kaitu (2022-07-27 14:25:02+00:00): Thanks for amending WP. What it said was not completely correct, as (at least in the 1:25000 scale version I can look at) the military map doesn't assign any name to the 3070 peak (the real Pizzo Cassana), so the name Punta Cassana doesn't appered at all. Guess nobody will matter ;-)

As for Cassana versus Casana. Both the military and the lombardy technical map use Cassana, which sounds standard italian. The name obviously derives as adaptation from the Swiss valley "Chaschauna". When pronouncing "Cassana" a local will naturally tend to make it sound like "Casana". So I'll just leave the official italian "Cassana", unless the "Casana" version is documented somewhere or actually written on signs.

When I imported those toponyms  many years ago, they looked like gold for an almost empty map. I didn't expect to throw in OSM so many inaccuracies or plain errors. Retrospectively, I wouldn't repeat the import. Thanks for helping to sort out this mess!
kuhni74 (2022-07-27 15:01:13+00:00): Ah, this could explain a lot! And certainly the abbreviations are not easy too ("P." vs. "P.ta", we have these problems in German language, too). After all, the alpine pastures in the west are called "Chaschauna", this name could have been moving on either of the peaks (or both, which is not so frequent, but it can happen, as it's the case with Corno di Dosdè and Pizzo di Dosdè opposite Val Viola Bormina - but it could have happened there by mistake, too).
As for "Cassana" vs. "Casana", both would be fine for me - the Swiss map, wikidata, WP-DE and WikiCommons all use "Casana" (adding that also "Cassana" is common), but if "Cassana" is better from the linguistic view, that's also fine.
Don't bother about any "mess", I bow in respect to everybody who started getting this wonderful OSM project going, and the start (with an empty map) is always hardest, isn't it? When I started contributing in 2020, most of the map (at least Europe) was ready and I'm only doing minor additions or corrections.
kuhni74 (2022-07-29 12:31:30+00:00): FvGordon restored the contact between the different ways around Punta Cassana.
Marcussacapuces91 (2022-01-06 12:40:53+00:00): Je sais ça fait longtemps...
Le cadastre dit "Place", vous écrivez Placis ? Dois-je corriger ?
marc__marc (2021-04-04 12:50:35+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/453470602
it's the room of a club ? if so witch kind of club ?
or it's a healtcare ngo ?
Regards,
Marc
utack (2015-12-28 11:47:52+00:00): Hi chan, schau bitte mal hier rein:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/489388

MfG
GerdP (2015-11-11 07:49:30+00:00): please review :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38449742
is tagged highway=conveyor.
This tag is rarely used, and the object looks more like a conveyor for goods, so
man_made=goods_conveyor
See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Goods_conveyor
keithonearth (2017-12-10 19:34:21+00:00): Hi Manny, I've added a a note, questioning existence of the gas station added by this changeset. Here's the note: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1234998
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 15:46:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/455891928/history has amenity = temple that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=temple? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship.
eggie (2023-10-14 15:18:04+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
GerdP (2015-11-15 10:46:30+00:00): please review:
I've replaced highway=historic by highway=disused.
If this is some kind of memorial, please add a historic=* tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38571640
SomeoneElse (2016-08-15 10:28:29+00:00): Just checking - should http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38572070/history be both an abandoned railway and an admin boundary? If it's the west edge of a cutting I'd guess that it's not actually a (former) railway, and if it (the NR) lies wholly in the county, wouldn't that make the admin boundary the East rather than the West side of the cutting?
Palolo (2023-02-08 19:18:41+00:00): Michael, have you thought about revisiting some of these older edits now that we have higher resolution imagery? Regards
Palolo (2020-12-23 05:29:29+00:00): I am having a hard time discerning the Masslo runway on Maxar imagery. There are some roads in this area, but none that would appear to qualify as a 2+ km runway. Any insights @MichaelCollinson ?
MichaelCollinson (2020-12-23 09:27:39+00:00): Hi Palolo, I mapped it in the early days of OSM when only landsat imagery was available - as an identification of ICAO code "HAML". I have no other local insight so I think it should be deleted (not doing it myself in case you have better insight). It is possible that the road immediately to the north follows the line of a former airstrip but clearly it is not that now. There is also a short linear feature just north of the road and "airstrip" at the far east end. Doubtful though with a tree very close to the middle part.
MichaelCollinson (2020-12-23 09:30:21+00:00): PS For ease of finding, the "airstrip" being discussed is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38711792
Palolo (2020-12-23 16:48:22+00:00): Thanks Michael, that is exactly what I thought. I haven't been to that area, so I don't have insights aside from looking at Maxar. I have asked a friend from that region if he has any information, but haven't heard back. I don't make it a practice to delete features other contributors add.
Thanks for your massive contributions to OSM.
marc__marc (2023-04-20 20:45:32+00:00): Hello,
Polderstraat <> Poederstraat : a typo or not ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38750155
Regards,
Marc
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 12:42:32+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you mapped as shop=internet in this edit ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)

It is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/459654601/history
Fa7C0N (2017-03-28 06:06:06+00:00): Hello  ajturner,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, I found you have edited some swimming pools in DC. The tagging schema you used looks weird.
Please verify here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool

Thank you
Fa7C0N
eggie (2018-06-17 19:39:29+00:00): Na jaren weer gestart  met osm. daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:37:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/461969717/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
anderfo (2024-02-08 09:23:15+00:00): Yes, definitely. this node is 14 years old but there's both handball and basket ball happening there, both in this building ("Husebyhallen", using the same entrance as the swimming pool "Husebybadet").
The newer building south of this (Heimdal videregående skole) also has a newer and larger handball arena "Kolstad Arena", through the separate entrance tagged with that name. Nodoby has tagget sport=handball there yet.
emvee (2024-09-08 20:02:59+00:00): Zelfde vraag als voor Gall & Gall, waar komt het winkelnummer vandaan, ik kan het niet op de website vinden.

Emvee
Meeuw (2024-09-09 06:54:51+00:00): Hoi Emvee,

Het winkelnummer staat vaak op je bon en het winkelpersoneel kan het je ook vertellen.

Het staat hier op de website:
https://www.etos.nl/on/demandware.store/Sites-etos-nl-Site/nl_NL/StoreFinder-GetStores?location=52.44%2C4.84
emvee (2024-09-09 20:05:58+00:00): Okay, bedankt handig z'n .json bestand!
GerdP (2015-11-05 16:18:33+00:00): please review: do you still think that a waterway=weir should also be mapped
as a highway=stepping_stones ?
I know the tag ford=stepping_stones,
but this doesn't seem to fit either.
GS25 (2015-11-06 08:48:56+00:00): I am glad to see you are approaching OSM with the zeal of the newly-converted.  It's probably ford=stepping_stones now, but that hadn't been defined 6 years ago.  I will fix it later.  There has been a lot of development on the river, and some things are no longer present.
GerdP (2015-11-06 08:59:02+00:00): okay, thanks for the feedback.
I don't feel like a newly-converted, but
yes, I am eager to reduce the number of
(now) ambigious tags ;-)
eggie (2021-04-23 19:30:32+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog een welkomstmail ontvangen Daarom Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
kreuzschnabel (2020-06-08 07:36:02+00:00): Es ist schon ewig her, ich weiß, aber was bitte ist das? Mit dem Namen kann ich nichts anfangen.
Connecticut (2020-06-08 09:30:20+00:00): https://www.hercher.tv/2019/12/02/heimatverein-bringt-quelle-adr-batterie-wieder-ans-laufen/
kreuzschnabel (2020-06-08 09:55:43+00:00): Danke. Sollte man dann vielleicht mit Apostroph schreiben :)
4gruwe (2020-06-09 10:50:14+00:00): Bitte mit Apostroph versehen, habe ich damals wohl vergessen :-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-16 17:34:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/471422775/history - it is a pawnshop, right?
Maciej9 (2025-08-03 20:42:18+00:00): „POD im. Stanisława Staszica” czym jest POD, czy miało być ROD?
Paul167 (2025-08-04 08:31:15+00:00): P = Pracowniczy, skrót POD występował na bramie, dlatego tak zmapowałem. Ale widzę, że od tego czasu zmienił nazwę na „Rodzinny”, więc bardzo dziękuję za poprawkę :)
SK53 (2018-10-03 15:46:23+00:00): I know it's quite some time ago, but I wondered if the footway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29261170#map=18/53.24775/-4.15419) which you mapped in this changeset is actually a public right of way (public footpath or similar) as indicated by the description? I think since that time we have started using designation=public_footpath to show these,  It would be nice to update them if possible.
MKnight (2016-07-18 21:11:38+00:00): minspeed sollte wohl eher maxspeed sein, oder? hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23037821#map=16/52.2248/7.8621
MKnight (2017-11-10 13:10:58+00:00): korrigiert.
das-g (2018-01-16 13:13:12+00:00): Should https://osm.org/way/39542667 really be landuse=meadow?

Note for checking this: https://osm.org/note/1269997
ma-rt-in (2017-06-30 14:20:10+00:00): Was hat es sich mit TV 1848 auf sich?
utack (2015-12-26 10:09:25+00:00): The "Shelfield Child Devlopment Centre" on node 476685156 is missing any main tags