piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2017-05-10 17:21:19+00:00): I do not agree that there is any "wrong building tagging here" . The "buildings" accross the road here are more like covered bridges between the buildings on either side of the road (See https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/bZPPSYMHaA5uDWpxSydIsA). I would find it absolutely silly to use tunnel=building_passage here.
Hjart (2017-05-10 17:29:08+00:00): Also i believe it's quite inappropriate to link to the Simple 3D buildings article in this context (I have mapped a few and know it quite well).
Chetan_Gowda (2017-05-11 17:36:21+00:00): Hjart, I agree for this. As these bridges are part of the Royal Library, we can move all connected bridges inside the multi-polygon and tag `layer = 1` and `bridge=yes` outside of multi-polygon.
literan (2017-05-09 14:14:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. вы неправильно наносите дворовые проезды. Названия на них не нужны, равно как и почтовые индексы, теги неверные. Я исправлю, посмотрите, как надо правильно
Chris Fleming (2017-05-09 16:32:28+00:00): I think the layer of car park you deleted in this layer is just the ground floor of the car park rather than incorrect mapping. (possibly over zealous mapping) but I think correct?
piligab (2017-05-09 17:48:13+00:00): Hi Chris:
I'm sorry. I didn't see the layer tag, I thought there was a overlap.
I will be more careful. I proceded to revert my changesets
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48538332
Thank you.
Chris Fleming (2017-05-09 21:29:36+00:00): Thanks!
griffonboi (2017-05-08 22:43:44+00:00): three*
Supaplex (2017-06-09 16:30:30+00:00): Duplicated of 紫琳蒸餃館
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4301004792
BladeTC (2017-05-12 19:03:34+00:00): Olá Wallace, por gentileza, evitar o uso da tag "highway:road" pois ela esta obsoleta. Use "highway:unclassified" para estradas que não souber a classificação. Obrigado!
JeroenHoek (2023-07-26 16:27:52+00:00): Weet je nog wat je bron is voor de Toki Pona namen? Ik kan 'ma Lise' niet fonetisch afleiden van Fryslân.
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:46:52+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
literan (2017-05-09 14:01:44+00:00): здравствуйте! вы в ряде мест задвоили уже существующие в базе камеры, в ряде мест пометили тегом камеры муляжи, да и вообще - точки камеры должны принадлежать линии дороги, а не стоять рядом с ней (в таком случае смысла в них нет). В связи с этим мне придется откатить вашу правку (впрочем, если что ценное там есть, я оставлю).
Алексей Чубуков (2017-05-09 16:20:57+00:00): Спасибо за замечания. Все правки были сделаны через osmand, поэтому в силу его ограниченности я не смог добавить точки в линии дорог. В следующий раз буду использовать другой редактор.
Supaplex (2017-05-09 01:31:31+00:00): Duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4836653430
Supaplex (2017-05-09 02:34:40+00:00): 你可以編輯既有的區域，而不是刪除重畫
srividya_c (2017-05-09 06:16:15+00:00): Hi Sheiko89,

Welcome and thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. 

In OpenStreetMap you need to add the features which exists in real world which we see around us using Satellite Imagery or the local knowledge. 

In this changeset you have added a park and footways which overlaps highways and they don't exist in Satellite imagery. Pleasemake sure you add valid data to OpenStreetMap. 

Please reach me out if you have any questions.

Thanks
Srividya
Supaplex (2017-05-09 04:12:16+00:00): Duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4836653430
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-06-27 09:54:28+00:00): Czemu zmieniłeś Wesoła 2 na Wesoła 5?
GerdP (2018-09-23 08:29:20+00:00): Hi! Please check accidential (?) highway=traffic_signals on way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492247885
It seems to be a highway=residential or unclassified.
CloCkWeRX (2017-05-13 12:02:15+00:00): There's better imagery available in the Digitalglobe Standard layer
nammala (2017-05-09 05:54:51+00:00): Hi alpapa,

Could you please confirm the waterways which you have added please.

Regards,
nammala
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
Supaplex (2017-05-12 10:09:16+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_3216889 (2017-05-09 18:50:02+00:00): Ik heb een omtrek om alle velden gezet, en dat als sportcentrum gemarkeerd.
Gras nu ook los van gebouw en parkeerplaats.
Dalkvist (2017-05-09 08:28:23+00:00): Hej ser att du karterat skoterleder, några tips: vi brukar inte rekommendera att använda path när den går över vatten eftersom man normalt sett kan gå på paths. Rekomenderade taggar för skoterleder finns på https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/WikiProject_Sweden/Snowmobile det är också de taggarna som synes på https://skoterleder.org
eggie (2017-05-09 07:02:36+00:00): Ik heb de rest van d gebouwen uit 1936 ook maar weggehaald.
PB gestuurd
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
Martiol (2017-05-09 06:23:34+00:00): Wrong description. Added power lines.
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
GRUBERND (2017-07-18 07:50:13+00:00): i am a bit confused why a deletion of a bare rock area is titled "building update" and why it was deleted at all - the rocks are clearly visible in the aerial images.
Tiamate (2017-07-18 07:54:00+00:00): Sorry, it was not my intention to delete anything.
You can revert my changeset
GRUBERND (2017-07-18 08:05:39+00:00): oh, i just realised - i _thought_ i had made it a bare_rock, but it was an empty way. so you were absolutely right to delete it.
i will just draw it anew.
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-05-10 20:52:41+00:00): I myślisz, że nikt tego nie zauważy?
Bąbel (2017-05-10 21:47:54+00:00): a to moje importy poprawiłeś... zmieniłem 'rozjechane prostokąty' i nazwę na oficjalną.
eggie (2017-05-09 09:16:37+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-05-09 09:18:49+00:00): Zeker weten dat dit een bloemen zaak is voor consumenten? https://www.wilbertstek.nl/nl/
Glassman (2017-05-09 10:58:17+00:00): I think you want landuse=residential. building=yes should just be the building outline. If you need help let me know.
Glassman (2017-05-09 10:58:24+00:00): I think you want landuse=residential. building=yes should just be the building outline. If you need help let me know.
user_5359 (2018-07-22 05:02:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
You have a very creative way of dealing with the keys at OSM. Let's start with the first keys access: It describes who is authorized to enter the place: Values are no (nobody), yes (all: standard value), etc. But you want to say that it is possible to enter the beach from the hotel. This is possible via description. 
You can also learn the meaning of the keys by following the links on the side of your hotel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4843164627.
By the way, the values of the payment key (payment:american_express until payment:visa) are yes or no. I will change these values in the next few days, if you don't mind.
freebeer (2018-07-23 17:29:12+00:00): unfortunately, this poi bears source=`google maps' which is a violation of their tos as well as not allowed as an osm source.
therefore i have deleted this poi in order to avoid future problems with rights issues.
if a redaction is required, have at it.
sorry, but the osm terms of use are very clear about this.
jaap de vries (2017-05-15 10:24:28+00:00): ik heb de weg voor je aangepast in privat anders komt ie als nog op de tomtom navigatie te staan op deze manier.
maraf24 (2019-09-23 22:24:06+00:00): Kilka szczytów było z błędami.
Z jakiego źródła korzystałeś?
Artek (2019-09-24 03:38:50+00:00): 2 lata temu mam pamiętać jakie źródło? 
Pewnie byłem wtedy w górach na majówce, więc źródło własne. 
Co tam było źle?
maraf24 (2019-09-24 09:14:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1882914
gileri (2017-05-11 20:13:59+00:00): La voie verte s'arrête en effet surement plus tôt, mais le passage n'est pas interdit ici. Pour moi ça s'apparente à un trottoir, même si la texture est différente (pavés il me semble).
xrt (2017-05-29 14:16:52+00:00): Les arceaux vélos sont au milieu, au panneau de la fin de la voie verte, pour que les piétons-vélos n'accèdent pas à la zone de manoeuvre des bus, où d'ailleurs il n'y a pas de passages piétons zébrés pour traverser les voies d'accès ou le rond-point des bus. Les utilisateurs de la voie vertes doivent traverser aux feux tricolores avant les arceaux vélos, passer sous le pont du chemin de fer, devant la station Vélov, et retraverser aux feux pour accéder au trottoir du pont sur le Rhône. Mais il est vrai que les personnes agiles et qui savent éviter les bus peuvent aller à travers tout droit. Il y a un trottoir sous le chemin de fer
gileri (2017-06-01 19:44:15+00:00): En effet la voie verte s'arrête à ce point, et des obstacles intentionnels (arceaux vélos) sont mis pour inciter les cyclistes à descendre de leur vélo.

Mais rien n'empêche le passage, tel que visible ici : https://framapic.org/xYa2bCgLXnu8/VytelSqckksn.jpg.

J'ai restauré le chemin dans le changeset 49175150.
xrt (2017-06-02 19:08:42+00:00): Je suis retourné voir. En effet il n'y a pas de panneau d'interdiction, donc il faut remettre cette circulation sur le trottoir
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:38:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:38:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:38:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:38:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-12 22:33:54+00:00): HI way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153213843 is tagged with a designation of public_bridleway, but you have added no to foot, bicycle and horse. Is this not a bridleway, or is there some reason for there to be no access to it?

Cheers,
Mike
albjorgui (2017-05-12 22:44:14+00:00): Hi. Yes I changed it because last weekend i went on a bike ride and tried to use the road to reach the path that in theory connects at the end of the road. However clear signs that it was a private road were found on the gate and along the service road and the owner of the property told me it was private property. It might be able to connect from the north side of the road but definitely not from the south one
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
Rodrigo Rega (2017-05-09 21:47:00+00:00): Buenas Bruno,

He visto que cambiaste esta vía [1] desde urbana a peatonal. Tal y como se puede ver en Mapillary [1], la calle no es peatonal. ¿Te parece ok si vuelvo a dejarlo como estaba originalmente?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69056863
[2] https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=-p0hXwj0Vxhuq8yy51CAIg&lat=43.01263342&lng=-7.54335437&z=17

Gracias por tus aportes al mapa y un saludo!
bportlp98 (2017-05-09 21:52:38+00:00): Disculpa la he debido de cambiar por error cuando estaba trazando un pequeño sendero entre casas. Ya la he cambiado yo. Gracias por avisarme del error
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:38:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
stephan75 (2017-05-11 19:41:05+00:00): Hi, du hast auch bei einigen Gebäuden via addr:postalcode eine Postleitzahl hinzugefügt, und zwar die 56130 ... bist du dir da sicher? müsste es nicht 56132 sein?
doDo93-marienfels (2017-05-12 10:01:41+00:00): Hallo,
im Gebiet Maaracker verläuft die PLZ-Grenzen etwas anders.
Den genauen Verlauf versuche ich noch heraus zu finden, gerade entlang der Nieverner Straße findet man beide Postleitzahlen.
Auf der Webpräsenz der meisten Firmen findet man jedoch die 56130, daher hab ich auch die 56130 verwendet.
stephan75 (2017-05-15 18:52:09+00:00): Hi, es gibt mindestens einen Web-Dienst zur Kontrolle einzelner Objekte in den PLZ-Gebieten von OSM:
https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/plz/?zoom=15&lat=50.33472&lon=7.70337&layers=BTFFFTFFFFFFT

Achte da mal auf die Farbe der einzelnen Gebäude, soweit diese eine PLZ eingetragen haben.

Es kann natürlich sein, dass die OSM-PLZ-Grenze da nicht 100% korrekt ist, aber könntest du da nochmal weiter forschen?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-11 03:39:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48576715 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical landuse changes.  A number have already been reverted; others have been complained about
eggie (2017-05-09 18:08:41+00:00): Dat nieuwe pad maak ik even los van de landuse. Ik twijfel niet aan je goede bedoelingen. 
Je kunt ook vragen of iemand van het forum je edits wil bekijken. Doe dan een klein stukje en zet je hyperlink van openstreetmap.org bij je verzoek.
Je mag het ook aan mij vragen. 
Op het forum kun je jezelf voorstellen onder het draadje welkom.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
eggie (2017-05-09 18:10:30+00:00): Het nieuwe pad zat aan de bovenkant vast aan de heide en niet aan het pad. Ik maak het los..
eggie (2017-05-10 07:55:30+00:00): Hoe steekt het pad de beek over.. is dat een brug of een duiker? 
Heet het pad daadwerkelijk officieel Heidepad??.. of kan die naam eraf?
SenV2312 (2017-05-10 08:10:02+00:00): Er is daar geen beek maar een geul - net zo als diegene die parallel loopt aan het pad. Er is wel een bruggetje (heel klein)
Of het een officiele naam heeft weet ik niet maar wij (de locals) noemen het het heidepad
eggie (2017-05-10 08:23:43+00:00): Wat je dan kan doen is het pad splitsen op twee plaatsen. Dan toevoegen bridge=yes en layer=1
... en de locals ga ik natuurlijk niet tegenspreken. :)

Stap zo snel mogelijk over op de betere editor JOSM. Die heeft een validator om foute uploads te voorkomen. Wij van het forum werken bijna allemaal met josm.
...editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710