piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dcapillae_old (2018-02-06 16:14:22+00:00): ¡Hola, aleK RC!

Gracias por mejorar el mapa de Málaga. Si te interesa mapear en la ciudad, puedes consultar la página del wiki dedicada al municipio: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A1laga

También puedes ponerte en contacto con otros contribuidores de la comunidad OSM en España: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a 

En OSM no ponemos nombre a objetos que no lo tienen. Si un parque no tiene nombre o no se conoce, no debemos nombrarlo como «Parque», por ejemplo. Si no tiene nombre o lo desconocemos, no se lo ponemos.

Los parques infantiles se mapean como «leisure=playground» y las pistas deportivas como «leisure=pitch». Tienes más información en el wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dplayground (para parques infantiles); https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch (para pistas deportivas).

Antes de añadir algo nuevo al mapa, asegúrate de que no esté ya mapeado. No debemos duplicar la información, pero siempre podemos corregir o mejorar la que ya existe.

Gracias por añadir puntos de interés al mapa (veterinarios, carnicerías, peliquerías, etc.), son realmente valiosos.

Si necesitas ayuda para empezar a mapear, consulta la guía del principiante: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_del_principiante

Gracias de nuevo y feliz mapeo.

Daniel
demon_box (2018-02-06 20:43:56+00:00): ciao, per favore non mettere alle relazioni dei sentieri nomi tipo "279 ex 479 var ex 7"
se il sentiero 279 non ha un nome proprio tipo "Sentiero tal dei tali" non mettere il tag name ma ripeto non mettere tutti questi nomi con "ex" perchè è sbagliato.
grazie
CAI Salò (2018-02-07 08:47:06+00:00): ciao, sono sentieri senza nome e dato che dobbiamo far sapere che la numerazione sta cambiando questo ci sembrava il miglior modo. Se hai suggerimenti li accogliamo volentieri. Sto organizzando un incontro con le varie realtà operanti, avrei necessità di un "tecnico" che spiegasse le nuove tecnologie di tracciamento, saresti disponibile per un pomeriggio di formazione?
Grazie
mueschel (2018-02-09 16:55:17+00:00): Could you check this way? It has some strange number as tag.

Cheers, Jan
下り専門 (2018-02-06 21:54:16+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56120805
adivik2000 (2018-02-08 03:53:54+00:00): Hi. Just checking. Is this an import?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56121116
mbranco2 (2018-02-14 19:11:41+00:00): No,this is not an import.
I'm leading an OSM project in an Italian high school, and all our activities are tracked as #ASL-Avogadro18".
To simulate a HOT project, we've set up a task on the Italian istance of Tasking Manager in this poorly mapped Indian area, and students are mapping using Josm and DigitalGlobe aerial imagery.
(I've not found an Indian ML, so I didn't announce this activity)
Hjart (2018-02-06 16:56:26+00:00): Der må ikke være huller i kystlinjerne, så vi bliver nødt til at rulle denne ændring tilbage
Constable (2018-02-07 11:23:24+00:00): è intitolata a qualcuno?
Constable (2018-02-07 11:24:43+00:00): inoltre, il metodo migliore per mapparla sarebbe quello di disegnarne l'edificio ricalcandolo dalle immagini aeree, poi inserire sull'edificio i vari tag per indicare che è una chiesa (building=church + amenty=place of worship + religion=* + denomination=* )
Ciao
Constable (2018-02-12 17:56:41+00:00): in qualche modo hai mappato anche l'edificio, peccato che hai dimenticato di rimuovere il nodo della chiesa. Ora Casale ha ben due chiese uguali. Chissà se hai letto il mio commento oppure per puro caso hai deciso di mappare anche l'edificio... bohhh
user_5359 (2018-02-06 17:29:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
Myazyk (2018-02-06 19:59:00+00:00): А чому школа не прив'язана до вулиці Шкільної?
olehz (2018-02-06 20:15:05+00:00): все там привязано. будівля з діркою складається з відношення, а не з зовношньої стіни
Daan Beernaert (2018-02-23 18:23:22+00:00): Beste Kimberly,

Uw wijzigingen aangebracht aan het Abdijpark waren onnodig, u creëerde 2 "parklagen" over elkaar... Indien u de kenmerken hiervan beter had bekeken had u dat vast wel opgemerkt. Hierom heb ik uw wijzigingen teruggedraaid naar de oorspronkelijke en reeds correcte toestand.

Mvg Daan
MsAdvill (2018-02-23 18:28:17+00:00): A super thanks! :D Ja ge weet dak zo slim nie ben é :D btw tis nog steeds KimberlEy Dan ;) 
Groetjes!
Digne (2018-02-08 08:22:48+00:00): Hallo Pietvanl,

Ik had hier nog even naar gekeken. Misschien is leisure=fitness_station iets toepasselijker ("buitenshuis fitness-station" in de web editor). Bij speeltuin denk ik toch wat eerder bij iets voor kinderen.
Pietvanl (2018-02-08 14:52:53+00:00): uhm en hoe kan ik dit aanpassen?
Digne (2018-02-08 15:12:15+00:00): Dat kan op dezelfde manier als het aanmaken van een speeltuin. Dus gewoon weer op het vlak klikken en dan zoeken in de keuzes.

Of: er staat nu amenity=playground onder in, in het tabelletje. Playground kan daar ook handmatig worden omgezet in fitness_station.
Pietvanl (2018-02-08 16:28:43+00:00): aangepast!
S-zation (2018-02-07 19:28:24+00:00): Thanks for reverting, I was trying to find this.  
FYI, it was intentional Pokemon Go vandalism: https://redd.it/7vvac7
Constable (2018-02-08 08:16:26+00:00): Hi there, no problem, I'm giving a quick look at this area to see if I can find more stuff like that
hsimpson (2018-04-11 15:35:58+00:00): Hi Chrossom?
Have you ever been to this area?
It is defitely a forest!
If you have taken a loor to the history of this multypolygon, you would have seen my changeset an could ask me, why this is a forest.
I will now change this back.
Regards
Jason Harrison (2018-02-10 00:53:42+00:00): Edit is good
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56122548
muralito (2018-02-06 19:26:11+00:00): Hola Micky-UY.

Gracias por la correccion. Hay que precisar, la calle existe, aunque al no ser de acceso publico.se le marca eso mismo con access=pirvate.
Sino, por ejemplo, hay herramientas que toman datos como posiciones de GPS aportadas por los navegadores y advierten que falta la calle.
Micky-UY (2018-02-08 14:31:42+00:00): Hola muralito. Gracias por tu explicación. Lo correcto sería denominarlo cómo Acceso a blocks A, B, C. Unos metros más adelante se encuentra el acceso a los blocks D, E, F. Ese acceso no figura en ningún mapa. Ni en OSM, ni en Google. Sin embargo tiene las mismas características que el anterior. 
Además, en las inmediaciones hay varios caminos internos de otros grupos de viviendas que tampoco figuran en los mapas. Creo que el error aquí es que por algún motivo, en los mapas oficiales, la calle figura (tal vez se proyectó en algún momento, pero al construir los edificios, se dejó de lado). Si observas alguna imagen satelital o Street view, verás lo que digo.
Saludos cordiales.
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-06 19:17:32+00:00): Hi JPShindelbower, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting many mapped buildings? Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56122855
viloan (2018-02-06 17:07:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
naoliv (2018-02-06 17:12:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 55864930, 55865017, 55876414, 55876679, 55877672, 55891915, 55899195, 56099599, 56113072, 56119106.
user_5359 (2018-02-06 19:24:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
user_5359 (2018-02-06 19:22:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. You add a line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/559174793 without any tag (some highways overlapping).
I have revert your changes.
What was the background for your test?
dazerine (2018-02-08 19:16:46+00:00): Buen edit!
aunque hay que procurar seguir la normalización de nombres:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a/Normalizaci%C3%B3n#Nombrado_de_V.C3.ADas
Se escriben en minúscula los artículos, preposiciones, pronombres y conjunciones.

Sería, por ejemplo, "Calle el Jardín", no "Calle El Jardín"
josu113 (2018-02-12 12:27:34+00:00): Adaptados los nombres de las calles según la normalización
lakedistrict (2018-02-06 22:21:44+00:00): North-east Kendal aka Sandylands. You could add a suburb node in the middle of the park by Kentmere Brow. Heron Hill could do with one too, maybe by the Spar?
gurglypipe (2018-02-07 00:31:21+00:00): Good point. Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56133545.
viloan (2018-02-06 17:48:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
L'imaginaire (2018-02-10 13:22:54+00:00): This is Korenlei 16, Graslei 16 is on the other side of the water. I fixed that for you
user_5359 (2018-02-07 05:45:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is there really every day at 09:30 a service (or only Sundays)?
Alan Trick (2018-02-06 19:01:38+00:00): This looks nice, but definitly either remove the old route or remove the overlapping sections and mark the remaining section as `abbandoned:highway=path`. In the future I'd also recommend smoothing out GPS traces a little more. Much of the small-scale wobbling about on a GPS track is actually from interference of the GPS signal. Exactly tracing the GPS path suggests more precision than is actually there, and is a lot of work too.
Alan Trick (2018-02-06 19:04:46+00:00): Err, I mean `abandoned:highway=path`
morehawes (2018-02-06 19:12:51+00:00): Thanks for the advice. I removed the old path.
DENelson83 (2019-04-28 06:49:00+00:00): I was just in this area today, and saw that additional "no trespassing" signs were posted at the currently-plotted entrance to this trail on Eagles Drive.  I seriously believe that this land is private property, and the landowner does not want anyone using this trail.
morehawes (2019-04-28 16:36:19+00:00): Thanks for the update, I haven't been over this way for a couple of months. Do you happen to know if there are signs posted at the other end (Tasman Road) also?
DENelson83 (2019-04-28 18:32:18+00:00): I have not been that way yet.  I am performing a ground survey of street addresses in Area C, and just finished putting in all of the addresses off Left Road.
morehawes (2019-04-28 23:23:59+00:00): Woah, yeah it looks like you've been busy! I'll try and head out over there some time and take a look. I bike through there, but there weren't any signs on that route. There are plenty of side trails, so perhaps there is another way through that is open.
DENelson83 (2019-05-12 01:17:33+00:00): I've just visited the Tasman Road end of this path, and strangely enough, I don't see any "no trespassing" signs at this end.
morehawes (2019-05-14 05:59:27+00:00): Thanks for the update. I visited the area on my ride today and saw the new signs, as well as no trespassing signs at the Tasman Road end (they are further along the path from the road). I did some local investigating and was told that they have a problem with motorised vehicles accessing the land and that non-motorised use is permitted. I was given the email address of the property owner so will make some further enquiries and update as necessary.
user_5359 (2018-02-07 05:43:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
AlaskaDave (2022-01-12 04:18:31+00:00): Hi Bernhard,

I'm visiting the Krung Ching waterfall area and the position where you placed it is wrong. I hiked part of the way to it this morning but did not reach the falls. We turned back because it was much farther than we expected. 

So, I removed the name tag from your waterfall node but I cannot intelligently relocate it. Maybe I'll find another reference to Krung Ching Waterfall somewhere and then add it to OSM at that time.
Bernhard Hiller (2022-01-12 13:14:26+00:00): Sorry for inconvenience. I do not remember details. Is a GPS track available from that time? As I have no computer here, I cannot check currently. By the way, I am in ban thung Yao, Trang province now. Enjoy your holidays in the south!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-04-30 13:58:10+00:00): esta incorreto, essa via não é uma trilha. por favor, tenha mais cuidado nesse tipo de edição
Adenisio Alves (2018-05-10 20:47:30+00:00): Erick de Oliveira,

Foi você que não teve atenção ao ler o que foi escrito "CHÃO, ACESSO RUIM DE VEICULO" onde esta escrito que e trilha, eu so disse que caminhão e carro o acesso e ruim. Não necessidade de dizer isso "tenha mais atenção" la passa com facilidade veiculos? faz muito tempo que voce não passa la então. Abraço, não estamos aqui para ajuda uns ao outro.
Adenisio Alves (2018-05-10 21:41:50+00:00): *Corrigindo "não estamos" mas sim para ajuda uns ao outro.
santamariense (2023-05-26 15:27:45+00:00): Olá rodrigoveterinario,

Qual a fonte utilizada para obtenção de nomes de vias com nomes com diversos códigos como "Caminho 471-035/040/045/050"?

[]'s

santamariense
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-05 06:52:35+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3628106 ?
viloan (2018-02-06 18:33:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
opendcc (2018-02-06 21:23:18+00:00): Why this large bounding box and why this silly change comment?
wille (2018-02-07 17:45:00+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição. Não é necessário acrescentar access=public em praças e parques. Por padrão, no OSM entendemos que os elementos são públicos. Costumamos utilizar a tag access em elementos que são restritos.

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56125481
iandees (2018-02-06 19:04:54+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56125764
nlehuby (2018-07-31 13:15:57+00:00): Bonjour,
tu as positionné ce coiffeur au milieu de la rue alors qu'il est plus probablement d'un côté ou bien de l'autre.
Pourrais-tu le placer avec plus de précision ?

Merci
zors1843 (2018-07-31 16:48:38+00:00): Moved to correct place
OpenBeerMapContributor (2018-07-31 20:23:55+00:00): 👍
nlehuby (2018-08-01 08:32:44+00:00): Thanks :)
JJIglesias (2018-02-07 02:57:41+00:00): Saludos Daniel, por favor en comments no pongas ,,,, o """";describe corto a que se debio el cambio,
//
Gracias
JJ
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-08-27 19:32:57+00:00): What is the real source of this edit? This buildings are not existing at this moment and no construction is active.

And I am pretty sure that the same was true on February 2018.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-08-27 19:33:37+00:00): Example of nonexisting building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/558617103#map=19/50.05869/19.96075
Meijinaerum (2018-08-28 16:38:51+00:00): Why have you deleted the geometry? It was perfectly drawn!!! You could have just changed buliding tag :(

Now there is a brownfield, nothing is builded indeed. But in february news said it will soon start (but it hasn't :( )

Plans were found somewhere here I recall: https://www.urbanity.pl/malopolskie/krakow/nowy-urzad-marszalkowski,b9434
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-09-16 19:41:34+00:00): "Why have you deleted the geometry? "

Because these buildings were not existing.

OpenStreetMap is a place to map what is currently existing, not what is supposed to exist or should exist.

It is possible to undo my edit and restore this data, so there will be no deed to redraw them.

Unfortunately it may be a bit complicated - let me know once construction really starts and I will undo edit that removed these buildings - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62050010#map=18/50.05897/19.96069
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-06 19:28:36+00:00): Hi Negin_Mallah, welcome to OSM. 

Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56126368
d_berger (2018-02-06 19:57:48+00:00): Everything fine, you did nothing wrong. Just wanted so say..."ach mini Jugend". *feeling sad*
captain_slow (2018-02-06 19:59:15+00:00): Sorry ;-)
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-07 17:14:37+00:00): Hi Castañeda_13, welcome to OSM.

Please only map what's on the ground.
This is changeset is #vandalism.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56127176

Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56951401
Jose Luis Infante (2018-02-06 19:54:54+00:00): Hola, parece que has borrado caminos que según la imagen por satélite existen. ¿Estás seguro de lo que has borrado?
zzptichka (2018-02-06 21:21:26+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56127342
Verdy_p (2018-02-09 13:29:41+00:00): This was done in rawedit (which still offers no way to add edit comments); this added more evident dictinctions in names, between land areas and admin boundaries
SomeoneElse (2018-03-15 00:10:23+00:00): Hello,
What exactly is "Jersey (land mass)"?  That looks like a description rather than a name.  If you want to have a relation for that, fine - but please don't make up names for things like that.  Also, this does look very much like an undiscussed mechanical edit...
Also, this is a very large changeset with no changeset comment.  Even if you can't find a tool to make the edits that you want (which I doubt) there's absolutely no reason to include objects over such a large geographical area in it.  In this changeset "France" is large because of the included overseas territories but "Jersey" (for example) is small.  
Also I think the wiki data entries are wrong - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q142?uselang=en-GB is the entry for France the country not the land area only for example.
Best Regards,
Andy
Verdy_p (2018-03-15 00:18:12+00:00): Raw edit is a set of individual edits on isolated tags. There's no way in it to create separate changesets, they are closed automatically but after long time (only made by the server, not by that editor).
The names for landmasses are not rendered on map, but they do no represent the whole area so yes "Jersey (land mess)" is accurate here, as it does not include the maritime areas of "Jersey" as a whole.
Verdy_p (2018-03-15 00:20:59+00:00): An no this was absolutely not "mechanical edit", they were done individually at very small speed, with raweditor, over a long perdiod of several hours using other editors.
If you know how to force "rawedit" to close its open changeset...
Why did I use rawedit, it's because for changing single tags, it was not necessary to load the full objects (which is dramatically slow here, even with JOSM partial doanload of relations)
SomeoneElse (2018-03-15 00:28:48+00:00): "Jersey (land mass)" is not a name, it is a description.

Re "RawEdit", you might find https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Level0 more functional.
Verdy_p (2018-03-15 01:40:10+00:00): Except that rawedit is integrated with other tools that propose to use either it (simple and fast for minor tag changes), or JOSM (too slow for these cases)
The names are consistant witrh other names for Landmass and were used because of confusion of admin boundaries and the fact that soime people created duplicate admin boundaries but actually not the same thing.
Nominatim does not even help to disambiguate the two, and for now adding the precision in the name has been completely harmless everywhere else it is used.
Verdy_p (2018-03-15 01:41:40+00:00): Note: "Jersey" alone would alsop be incorrect ! Jersey is larger than that.
The name is already fully descriptive of the intended use.
It will never cause any problem in searches of boundaries....
SomeoneElse (2018-03-15 17:50:55+00:00): Hu Verdy_p,
Please don't be so argumentative - I'm trying to help you here!

With regard to names, their use in OSM is well-established - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only .  By those criteria "Jersey (land mass)" is not a name.    The actual name for both the individual island (the dry bit) and the administrative area that includes a wet bit and a dry bit is "Jersey".  If you want to create a relation including the (dry) island of Jersey and the smaller islands administered by it then by all means create it, but please don't make up a name for it.
Best Regards,
Andy