piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2022-09-29 06:59:30+00:00): Hi Bocoum45,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=34.48758&lat=0.38287&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126661212

I have reverted it to fix those issues.

May be you like to educate yourself about how to use the internal validator of JOSM:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator
 
Kind regards
Guido
SomeoneElse (2022-09-28 14:32:48+00:00): I'm not sure how it happened, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098017268 seemed to become part of Surrey Hills AONB (7640939) after this - I've removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7640939 .
Colin Smale (2022-09-28 14:39:58+00:00): My bad, I think I copied one too many relations over to the new boundary way. Thanks for fixing!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-28 13:13:33+00:00): reverted
LuxuryCoop (2022-09-28 10:40:06+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
archpdx (2022-09-27 17:48:13+00:00): Hi,
This appears to be an import of Microsoft buildings. Was this import discussed/documented? As I mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125461976, all imports must be discussed and documented before uploading.

I noticed some quality issues with the geometry of buildings. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098020867 doesn't line up with imagery. I also noticed this changeset adds tags to buildings that aren't useful to OpenStreetMap ('FID', 'capture_date', 'release').
Cristoffs (2022-09-27 12:23:54+00:00): Proszę opisuj swoje zmiany.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126661751
Laci (2023-02-25 03:10:36+00:00): Hi, why did you remove the narrow_gauge tag? Tramway du Mont-Blanc is 1000mm.
Patchi (2023-02-25 07:15:48+00:00): Hi Laci, 
you are probably right. In the process of separating the existing relation for the railroad and the relation for the transport line (which were mixed), I probably set the tag railway=rail. I just put the not disused railroad-lines to railway=narrow_gauge. Thank you for your message!
Best regards,
Patchi.
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:36:43+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126661738
SHARCRASH (2022-09-26 20:11:02+00:00): Hi! Thanks for pointing out this way you deleted. Actually it was supposed to be the continuity of www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095621034 I guess that i tagged it with highway=track by mistake while working too swiftly.
DianaDemchuk (2022-09-27 06:18:54+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. Now the situation on the map looks more accurate.
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:36:53+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126661738
Frans S (2022-09-28 10:36:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126662269
mueschel (2022-10-22 11:07:19+00:00): Reminder: Please improve your QA. I'm fixing misspelled tags by Grab employees on a almost daily basis.
impiaaa (2022-09-27 15:34:36+00:00): Please use a more descriptive changeset message; what errors did you fix? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Also, please keep your changes limited to one local area at a time, to keep the overall size of each changeset a manageable size.
eggie (2022-09-26 17:03:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Ik zie dat je het al verder hebt aangepast.. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-26 19:21:53+00:00): Dag Coark.. Alle adressen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Daar beter niets aan veranderen. Wanneer 9b niet zou bestaan kun je dit beter doorgeven aan het Kadaster.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-26 19:31:49+00:00): 9b hersteld..  Volgens het Kadaster bestaat 11a niet.
Doe je zelf een terugmelding?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Appelmarkt%209a&resultOffset=0&objectId=0420100000030074&geometry.x=138830.88300257&geometry.y=523984.40000042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-26 19:24:37+00:00): Beste , 
Bedrijven die geen mogelijkheid hebben tot bezoek worden niet opgenomen in OSM.
Info is verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-26 19:27:55+00:00): Dag Coark.. Alles in OSM heeft z'n format zoals bepaald is volgens de conventie van OSM.
opening_hours=  dus ook.

Dit is helaas niet correct.
ma: gesloten di: 10:00 - 17:00 wo: 10:00 - 17:00 do: 10:00 - 17:00 vr: 10:00 - 17:00 za: 10:00 - 17:00 zo: gesloten

Je kunt deze 'tool' gebruiken om de juiste format te krijgen.
 

openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 
 


MVG
eggie
user_177389 (2022-09-26 17:24:31+00:00): Was soll das sein? Erlenbach gibt es bereits: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/335466
Der Grenzverlauf passt zudem überhaupt nicht zu den Katastergrenzen. Die Herumprobiererei sieht so aus, als ob da irgendwas mit "Tagging für den Renderer" vor sich geht.
CarlFriedrich (2022-09-27 04:43:08+00:00): Hallo Garmin User,
ich versuche gerade das Einzugsgebiet des Baches "Erlenbach" zu kartieren. Da es in OSM meines Wissens keine eigene Flächenfunktion gibt, habe ich ersatzweise eine Grenze gezogen.
Ich werde diesen Layer löschen, würde die Linie (ohne Layer) aber gerne behalten.
Grüße CarlFriedrich
DD1GJ (2022-09-27 08:05:42+00:00): Gallo CarlFriedrich

für private Kartendarstellungen gibt es https://umap.openstreetmap.de/

Flusseinzugsgebiete lassen sich in OSM allenfalls durch rekursive Rückverfolgung der in der Datenbank enthaltenen Gewässer ermitteln. Ansonsten bleibt der klassische Weg über externe Höhenmodelle und entsprechende GIS-Software.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-14 14:48:00+00:00): chyba do skasowania są te relacje?

Czy sa szanse że to odwieszą za niedługo?
Julbus (2022-10-30 08:38:29+00:00): C'est un brouillon, à vérifier sur place
Samuel Chávez (2022-12-23 22:31:10+00:00): Existe una buena práctica en OSM de escribir una breve reseña de lo que se hace en cada changeset, por lo que deberías de escribir no sólo actualización. También debes de responder a los comentarios de otros mapers de OSM, porque debes de justificar tus ediciones. De no hacerlo pueden suspender tu cuenta temporalmente.
mavl (2022-09-27 05:13:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем на здании детского сада нужно название детского сада? Название уже есть на самом детском саде и дубликат названия не нужен.
south ural (2022-09-27 17:16:44+00:00): 






Добрый день! Так, на крыше ещё до меня написали. Согласен, там оно не надо.
П3тр0виЧъ (2022-09-29 03:42:30+00:00): Это вы добавили название на здание, кого вы обмануть пытаетесь?
Knock Nevis (2022-09-27 18:23:14+00:00): "reverting vandalism by Knock Nevis"
haha - ok.
These houses have already been demolished, but you know better sitting hundreds of kilometers than me.
Mazda05 (2022-09-27 21:04:35+00:00):  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war
Knock Nevis (2022-09-28 13:28:20+00:00): ok, but  "reverting vandalism" sounds offensive.
Mazda05 (2022-09-28 15:19:52+00:00): it's a fact
Knock Nevis (2022-09-28 18:53:36+00:00): the fact is that you insult me with this.
Mazda05 (2022-10-01 18:41:50+00:00): Your mapping doesn't match the consensus norms of the OpenStreetMap community: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war. It's https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism. No insults, only facts
Jonas Sch (2022-09-26 18:52:43+00:00): Where?????? This square is bigger than France, Germany, Spain, Italy and Poland TOGETHER
ivanbranco (2022-09-26 19:34:01+00:00): @Jonas Sch: Greece and UK. It's only two elements, not hard to find out. It's their first edit, take it easy.

@MiguelVP: Welcome to OSM :) I don't know how MAPS:ME works, but if possible next time upload your edits before moving to another location, more info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Good mapping!
rene78 (2022-09-26 21:28:45+00:00): 👍 @ivanbranco
MiguelVP (2022-09-26 21:47:27+00:00): Thanks for the advise. Indeed I am not familiar with maps.me and the way it works. Sorry for the mistake. Is there anyway I can remove this error?
rene78 (2022-09-26 21:57:04+00:00): You haven't made a mistake at all. Some people are trying to check changesets in their vicinity with help of the not very powerful "History" button on osm.org. Changesets like yours, which cover a large area, tend to be a bit distracting in this endeavour. But not a big deal in my opinion. @Jonas Sch, maybe you can try this tool to check changesets in your area of interest: https://rene78.github.io/latest-changes
MiguelVP (2022-09-26 21:59:02+00:00): Back in July I added a spot in Scotland, I thought it was closed (I was clearly wrong). Then yesterday I added another spot in Rhodes, Greece. I did not realised that it was linked yet with the one in Scotland...
SekeRob (2022-09-27 06:21:23+00:00): 👍 @rene78, best change tool yet when focused on a particular area. Added to my kit.
DaveF (2022-09-27 15:09:20+00:00): I use this Overpass routine as it also filters out my own edits:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mfa
Stalker61 (2022-09-26 19:14:30+00:00): Добрый день. Я так понимаю, что вам не терпится схлопотать немедленный бан за ахинею с указанием наименований съездов. Информация вносится на основании дорожных указателей, а не ваших личных предпочтений. Пожалуйста прекратите эту вакханалию. это уже начинает раздражать пользователей OSM.
Stalker61 (2022-09-26 19:22:23+00:00): Это что за хрень - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25627764#map=18/55.23592/61.52263
Кремлёвский штурман (2022-09-27 03:53:41+00:00): Здравствуйте!
1. Научитесь разговаривать (это о предыдущем сообщении).
2. Информация вносится на основании маршрутов данных дорого указанных в соответствующих постановлениях Правительства России и органов власти субъектов федерации.
Stalker61 (2022-09-27 04:30:36+00:00): Очередной мультиаккаунт.
mavl (2022-09-27 05:04:26+00:00): Здравствуйте, south ural. Вы меняете правильные статусы дорог на неправильные.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway  
  
Изучите, пожалуйста, назначение статустов дорог перед редактированием большого количества объектов.  
Также, пожалуйста, не заполняйте тег destination на основании нормативно-правовых актов. Этот тег заполняется по реальным дорожным знакам.  
  
Владимир Маршинин   
Рабочая группа по данным
south ural (2022-09-27 17:21:19+00:00): Знаки в России и странах СНГ зачастую не соответствуют действительности и часто в носят путаницу в отличии от нормативно-правовых актов. Да, создатели знаков должны полностью следовать нормативным актам, но руководствуются порой чем попало, только не документами.
ZeLonewolf (2022-12-13 02:12:28+00:00): Thanks for adding these names!  For future reference, street names should be unabbreviated, i.e., "Drive" "Street" "Avenue" etc.
AaronFitz (2022-12-14 17:21:10+00:00): Very helpful feedback, thanks and will do!
felipeeugenio (2022-09-26 18:45:13+00:00): Hola.
Secondary?
Cuál es el motivo? no lo veo como un camino muy importante. Pienso que estaba bien como tertiary. En la wiki hay mas detalles
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126667765
rlaracol (2022-09-27 18:38:43+00:00): Cuarta Terraza es según la Ilustre Municipalidad de Puerto Montt, la vía de mayor importancia en el sector. Hace unos días se realizó la apertura de esta arteria para conectar con Avenida Diagonal Laguna 1, lo que descongestionará Avenida Marcelo Fourcade y es la vía conectora directa al Sector. Santuario de la Laguna. Reviste la misma importancia del resto de la avenida Cuarta Terraza que está como secondary
felipeeugenio (2022-09-27 19:47:18+00:00): ok, dejémoslo así entonces. pero ojo con cambiar las clasificaciones. SObre todo si estás usando un ruteador.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2022-09-27 19:47:49+00:00): veo que hay varios condominios privados puestos como barrios. eso se tendrá que arreglar.

saludos
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-10 03:07:46+00:00): Don't double tag things.  It should either be tagged in the building area, or tagged as a point, but not both.  For example, Chase Bank:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10054412051
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098071987

Just pick one and go with it.
Mammi71 (2023-08-07 21:44:12+00:00): Hallo Mah, du hast hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=126668096#map=19/48.82442/10.07712
eine detailliert als way gemapte Wendeschleife gelöscht und als einfachen Knoten gemappt. Warum?
Dadurch wurden Details entfernt.
Das wiki ist dazu eindeutig:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop
"Wenn eine Wendeschleife als Weg kartiert wurde, darf sie nicht als einfacher Knoten neu kartiert werden, da dadurch Details aus der Karte entfernt würden."
Mah (2023-08-15 15:46:48+00:00): Hallo Mammi71,
meinst du die Wendeschleife in der Röntgenstraße?
Das ist ja fast ein Jahr her, was hat den da genau gefehlt bzw ist verloren gegangen?
Mammi71 (2023-08-17 19:46:25+00:00): Hallo Mah, danke dass Du Dich meldest. Ja, ich meinte die Wendeschleife in der Röntgenstr. in Aalen. Wenn ich die Changesets richtig interpretiert habe, hattest Du eine zuvor bereits mit korrekter Straßengeometrie gemappte Wendeschleife auf einen Punkt reduziert. Die bereits detailliert erfasste Straßengeometrie ging dadurch verloren. Nachdem es sich inzwischen ein anderer Mapperkollege vor Ort angesehen und Fotos angefertigt hat, wurde dies inzwischen wieder korrigiert, also die Straßengeometrie wiederhergestellt und weitere Details ergänzt.
jcr83 (2022-09-26 21:01:47+00:00): Au niveau de la carrière, je me suis permis de remplacer les access=no par des access=private qui me semblent être plus conformes à la réalité.
Frans S (2022-09-27 13:20:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention on accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key.
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.

Despite this is a building project, you also mapped roads. However, there is no need to map such tracks throughout the fields. You called them unclassified as well. Path or track should be better.
You mapped 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126668452
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:37:00+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126661738
NieWnen (2022-09-27 08:46:37+00:00): Jak jest tutaj pas rowerowy to nie w ten sposób.

Zobacz jak to tagować odpowiednio tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
highflyer74 (2022-09-27 06:07:01+00:00): Moin!

Sei so nett, vor dem Hochladen der Daten einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar zu schreiben, damit andere deine Intention verstehen können.

Weitere Infos dazu gibt es hier:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

 Danke!
JIFFNET (2022-10-05 12:43:18+00:00): Hej!
Czy w związku z przedłużeniem szlaku zielonego szlak papieski rozpoczyna się teraz na Przełęczy u Panienki? Czytałem kiedyś że szlak papieski miał iść z Kóz razem z żółtym po korekcie.
Pozdrawiam,
J
englu (2022-10-05 16:51:41+00:00): Hej! Co jest dalej z papieskim za Przełęczą u Panienki to nie wiem. Zmianę wprowadziłem na podstawie informacji od osoby, która tam była i widziała skasowany papieski na odcinku od Kóz do przełęczy. Dopytam osób, które znakowały przedłużenie zielonego, może coś będą wiedzieć.
englu (2022-10-06 08:04:55+00:00): Hej! Szlak papieski jest teraz poprowadzony wzdłuż szlaku żółtego z Kóz, ale oznaczenia w terenie zostały zamalowane. Są tylko tabliczki na początku i na końcu szlaku, które o tym informują :)
gscholz (2022-10-12 16:10:52+00:00): Hi Joseph,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines (red markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=37.61102&lat=-1.78952&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126669677
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126669677

My impression is you have destroyed some buildings which originally had a circular shape.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Joseph Munyenze (2022-10-12 16:49:54+00:00): How can I go about it?
gscholz (2022-10-12 18:06:57+00:00): Hi,
sorry I do not understand this question. do you mean how to fix those errors with OSMI? Just click on one of the red markers, a window will appear so you can edit the error directly in JOSM.

May be you like to educate yourself about the JOSM validator, which can help here as well:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Guido
Joseph Munyenze (2022-10-13 02:22:59+00:00): Yeah, I meant, how I can correct the errors.
let me use learn through that link so that I may be able to correct them.
Thanks.
gscholz (2022-10-14 07:26:42+00:00): Hi Joseph, 
what about fixing those errors, they are still present?
Guido
gscholz (2022-10-29 09:09:00+00:00): Hi,
due to your missing response I have fixed it now.
Guido
Nearby0051 (2022-09-26 20:14:41+00:00): Weitere Note hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3375190
opendcc (2022-09-29 12:24:50+00:00): Hallo,

darf ich Dich bitte auf ein paar Regeln bei OSM aufmerksam machen? Da wäre zum einen 'Tagging what's on ground', also nur das, was in echt existiert. Zum anderen die Namensvergabe (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name ) . Bitte passe die Edit zeitnah entsprechend an, Danke.
Piz Pachific (2022-09-27 20:26:56+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine Mühe mit den Adressen! Da scheint meine Bemerkung eine Kleinigkeit zu sein: Und zwar hast du evt. ausversehen die landuse areas bei Kerns gelöscht. Einmal die landuse für residential (way 95129258) und einmal für meadow (way 438543545). Wäre es möglich, diese wieder einzufügen?
FischersFritz (2022-10-04 07:17:16+00:00): Ok und danke für den Hinweis. Habe die Landuses nun wieder hinzugefügt - wenngleich nicht so überzeugt von landuse=meadow.
Piz Pachific (2022-10-05 11:16:13+00:00): Danke dir. Wieso nicht so überzeugt von landuse=meadow? Rein aus Interesse.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-07 12:43:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10054550646/history has railway = 26 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
silversurfer83 (2022-09-27 09:19:33+00:00): Moin,
wie bei der Garage nebenan:
Bei solchen Änderungen bitte eine nachvollziehbare Quellenangabe. Danke
closedwalkingtrail (2023-06-17 13:03:11+00:00): Café / restaurant Les sœurs Louise bestaat niet meer. Er is ook geen andere horeca in het pand.
Deze kan beter verwijderd worden van de kaart om dorstige wandelaars en fietsers niet teleur te stellen.
L'imaginaire (2023-06-18 07:46:52+00:00): Jammer. Is ondertussen aangepast door mapper Jakka. Bedankt voor het seintje!
Cristoffs (2022-09-27 12:22:08+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie usunąłeś ten budynek?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126670706
Cristoffs (2022-09-27 12:21:03+00:00): Kasując obiekty opisuj zmiany. Tak nie wolno robić.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126670730
Cristoffs (2022-09-27 12:20:07+00:00): Błędnie oznaczyłeś ten teren. Tak się tego nie oznacza. Proszę poczytaj jak powinno się teren szkoły oznaczać.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126670753
highflyer74 (2022-09-27 05:15:24+00:00): Moin!

Sei so nett, POIs nicht zu löschen, wenn sie beispielsweise leerstehen. Wir verwenden dafür das https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix.

Ich weiß nicht, ob das über OsmAnd möglich ist. Falls nicht, erstelle lieber einen Hinweis, damit andere Mapper solche POIs entsprechend taggen können.

Wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich gern!
jetthe (2022-11-05 17:53:53+00:00): Hi!
This import seems to have rendered some errors in the map data, check the overlapping oneway trunk_links with wrong directions in Saltvik (1098092995).
Msiipola (2022-11-05 18:13:04+00:00): I found and fixed an error on one of the trunk_links (erroneously set to oneway) 
Update in changeset 128531140
jetthe (2022-11-06 08:46:20+00:00): Check also way 1098092995 which is in wrong direction. Perhaps it should be merged with way 29995435 since the latter is longer and they share all the same tags.
Msiipola (2022-11-06 09:11:47+00:00): Fixed in changset 128547081
Hufkratzer (2022-09-27 13:50:44+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/227402 doesn't look like a pitch, it should probably be track; and the sport should probably be horse_racing instead of horse_riding (see wiki).
ruugie (2022-09-26 20:36:13+00:00): May you please draw landuse=residential around settlements?
emersonveenstra (2022-09-28 18:15:51+00:00): Is the housenumber https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098096153 supposed to be 932?
ivanbranco (2022-09-28 22:26:41+00:00): Ciao airon90,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4109232797/history

brand=BiTs ?

"COS’È BiTS? 
BiTS è il nuovo servizio di bike sharing a stazioni fisse del Comune di Trieste."
Nakaner (2022-09-27 08:17:23+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz zwei image=*-Tags hinzugefügt. Üblicherweise erfassen wir im image=*-Tag nur URLs von den Bildern, die unter einer freien Lizenz stehen. Auf der Website https://sonnige-pfade.de/ finde ich hingegen folgenden Copyright-Hinweis in der Fußzeile:

> © 2022 Alle Texte und Bilder sind (soweit nicht anders gekennzeichnet) Eigentum des website

Wo finde ich die Angabe, dass diese zwei Bilder unter einer freien Lizenz verfügbar sind?

Darüber hinaus möchte ich dich bitten, beim Hochladen von Änderungssätzen künftig einen aussagekräftigen Kommentar anzugeben, der die Änderungen beschreibt. "Ergänzungen" ist nicht ausreichend. Siehe hierzu auch

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126671614
NieWnen (2022-09-27 10:39:40+00:00): Cześć
Dzięki za zmianę, 
drobna uwaga. Postaraj się łączyć (przecinać) chodniki z ulicą na przejściach (i nie tylko) – tak żeby miały wspólny węzeł. Bez tego routing nie zadziała. 
Z tej zmiany poprawiłem takie przejścia.