piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-09-06 01:50:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
Warin61 (2022-05-09 02:02:52+00:00): Hi,
Nit picking ...
The sport pitches Way: 722379788 and Way: 722379789 don't look to have any  physical existence? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch#How_to_map suggest using a node in such situations. I have mapped the 'recreation_ground' that surrounds the area ... maybe more appropriate place to tag the sports .. these probably move around the area anyway.
philam48 (2022-05-09 10:01:57+00:00): Thanks Warin61, good point! I'll switch that over now
GOwin (2019-09-06 02:47:30+00:00): Thank you!
Thosewhoknow (2025-10-14 16:23:28+00:00): Is there a source for the tunnel under the Liffey at the docks? I’ve searched online and I can’t find a mention, nor does satellite imagery show an entrance.
VictorIE (2025-10-14 19:14:30+00:00): Hi,

It is shown on page 40 of 49 here: https://dublinportabr.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2_ABR-EIS-Revisions-for-RFI-FINAL-1.pdf

Page 23-24 of 147 here: https://www.dublincity.ie/sites/default/files/2021-01/engineering-review-report-june-2019.pdf show some of the other crossings.

Page 24 of 53 here (very small): https://www.esbnetworks.ie/docs/default-source/publications/electricity-distribution-network-capacity-pathways-consultation-report---accessible-version.pdf

It is quite possible that it is exceptionally small in diameter. It dates, I think from the 1930s. There seems to be several other crossings that haven't been mapped.
VictorIE (2025-10-14 20:32:58+00:00): Page 5 of 86 here: https://dublinport3fm.ie/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Chapter-5-Project-Description-Volume-2-Part-1.pdf marks it as "Cables".
VictorIE (2025-10-14 22:15:27+00:00): This is annoying me now. Five cables! https://dublinportmp2.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/CP1770-ATK-01-ZZ-M2-CE-2721-Proposed-ESB-Network.pdf
user_5359 (2019-09-06 03:49:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useless information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mavl (2019-11-16 18:00:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
SomeoneElse (2019-09-06 13:56:38+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722385324 really a park?  It looks like a residential area to me from the imagery.
nmsl🤣 (2019-09-07 09:54:15+00:00): 清远轻轨是什么东西
SomeoneElse (2019-09-06 13:44:02+00:00): Why was the name of the lake removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616958281 ?
TravGW (2019-09-06 21:29:10+00:00): The lake in question (Downtown Lake) was one of many lakes/ponds with generic names Yeti11 created. They created several ponds with names such as Walmart Pond, Community Center Lake. I removed the names and adjusted the outlines.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-06 21:37:38+00:00): Thanks
Kovoschiz (2019-09-06 05:04:33+00:00): Curving the road along the bus bay or any lay-by is incorrect. It isn't part of trafficked carriageway.
Kovoschiz (2019-09-06 05:05:28+00:00): You also misaligned Nathan Road to the west.
jonathanchik (2019-09-06 06:20:23+00:00): Agree on comment on lay-by alignment.
For misalignment, the original alignment seems didnt consider the pavement width and not aligned to centre-line of carriageway.
Kovoschiz (2019-09-06 09:27:01+00:00): It looks to me correct alignment is between the original and new one.
Kovoschiz (2019-09-06 09:27:31+00:00): You can use `bus_bay=left` to show there's a bus bay on the left of the road on that section.
jonathanchik (2019-09-06 09:58:24+00:00): Some may need further fine tune :P
I will adopt bus_bay later. Thanks.
kreuzschnabel (2019-10-02 13:02:03+00:00): Hallo Tornado, du hast einige Stückchen der A 45 nördlich Wetzlar-Ost „construction=yes“ getaggt. Wahrscheinlich sollte das „hier ist eine Baustelle“ heißen, aber tatsächlich bedeutet es „ist im Bau“, d.h. nicht nutzbar, weshalb das von Routern jetzt gemieden wird. Siehe Wiki. Ich nehm die construction-Tags daher wieder weg. 
 
construction=yes ist ohnehin deprecated, da es wenig Aussage hat. Eine Autobahn im Bau heißt highway=construction + construction=motorway, das construction-Tag wird also sozusagen „zwischengeschaltet“.
Harald Hartmann (2019-10-02 13:46:22+00:00): siehe auch die Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74156647
thetornado76 (2019-10-02 16:26:20+00:00): Du hast es ja schon korrigiert. Danke!
Siehe auch meinen Kommentar im verlinkten Changeset
user_5359 (2019-09-06 06:49:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2019-09-06 06:46:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added an unknown tag "g Wiltze"="Lake dam" in this change set. Please explain the meaning of the key.
user_5359 (2019-09-08 11:35:16+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of key bname?
ysosu (2019-09-09 01:44:45+00:00): building name = bname
user_5359 (2019-09-09 04:06:32+00:00): I don't know why you have to mention the name of a building separately again if you have assigned a name to the building (building=.., name=..). But we usually didn't use an abbreviation for the key. There are exactly 799 building_name (at 358628291buildings)
user_5359 (2019-09-12 15:37:03+00:00): Do you change the mistake or should I take it over?
ysosu (2019-09-18 02:02:14+00:00): 我用了一个叫thingjs的平台，他不能读取到name这个字段，我只能再加一个叫做bname的字段，thingjs官方给我的答复是他们最近也在处理这个问题，再等等
user_5359 (2019-09-18 03:26:53+00:00): Can I change it for you or do you still need it to stay compatible with the platform (not necessarily an OSM target) ?
我可以为您更改它还是仍然需要它与平台保持兼容（不一定是OSM目标）？由Google Translator翻译
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
Takogin (2019-09-11 12:19:49+00:00): Hi! Please do not add names like C/B/etc, it is not valid names for buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74156541
drolbr (2019-10-02 12:57:30+00:00): Hi,

vom Tag construction=yes bin ich etwas überrascht. Üblich ist laut Wiki die Verwendung für Wege, die für Baustellen gesperrt sind, aber die A45 ist in beide Fahrtrichtungen befahrbar (wenn auch ggf. in Baustellen-Verkehrsführung). Hat das Tag hier einen gewollten Zweck oder könnte ich das Tag wieder entfernen?

Viele Grüße,

Roland
Harald Hartmann (2019-10-02 13:19:58+00:00): Zur Info: construction=yes wurde bereits mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75188110 entfernt. Laut https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/324045585 hat thetornado76 lediglich den vorherigen key "under_construction" von Lokalfuerst "umbenannt" und damit wohl eine ungeahnte Kettenreaktion ausgelöst.
Harald Hartmann (2019-10-02 13:23:52+00:00): Meine Frage wäre, ob es trotzdem einen Tag für länger andauernde Baustellen gibt, da die Autobahn zwar weiterhin "benutzbar" ist, aber es ja doch meist auf Grund von Fahrbahnverengungen bzw. Reduzierungen von Fahrstreifen zu Beeinträchtigungen kommen kann, und das ein Router durchaus "berücksichtigen" (abwerten) könnte.
kreuzschnabel (2019-10-02 13:53:11+00:00): In der Regel werden bei zeitlich längeren Baustellen maxspeed=* und oft auch overtaking:*=*-Tags gesetzt. Die sollten IMHO einem Router reichen, um den Abschnitt passend zu priorisieren, und haben gegenüber einem allgemeinen construction=yes den Vorteil, konkret quantitative Aussagen zu machen.
thetornado76 (2019-10-02 16:20:47+00:00): Wie Harald schon schrieb, habe ich den tag nur umbenannt. Das der "construction" tag problematisch für highway ist, war mir so nicht bewusst, da er mir öfters in den USA beim mappen aufgefallen ist und ich beim Routing damals keine Probleme hatte.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-06 13:49:21+00:00): In this changeset you've recreated the park that was added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55533451 , but looking at the imagery of that area it really does not look like a park to me.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-06 13:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74176707 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some reverts of reverts of Pokemon Go edits worldwide.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3141 for more details
SomeoneElse (2019-09-06 14:32:58+00:00): Also in here you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593868115/history back from "swimming pool" (which looks correct) to "aquaculture" (which doesn't).
I've changed it back.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-06 13:51:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74176707 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some reverts of reverts of Pokemon Go edits worldwide.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3141 for more details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-06 13:51:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74176707 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some reverts of reverts of Pokemon Go edits worldwide.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3141 for more details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-06 13:51:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74176707 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some reverts of reverts of Pokemon Go edits worldwide.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3141 for more details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-06 13:51:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74176707 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some reverts of reverts of Pokemon Go edits worldwide.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3141 for more details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-06 13:51:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74176707 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some reverts of reverts of Pokemon Go edits worldwide.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3141 for more details
user_5359 (2019-09-07 04:17:34+00:00): Hello! Please use the key phone for a phone number. Also write the value with international number format like +33 nn mmmmmm
user_5359 (2019-09-06 06:43:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the school please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
aceman444 (2019-09-12 05:38:04+00:00): Zdravim, to naozaj je usek ulice Sv. Stefana uz len pre cyklistov? Je to tak natrvalo? Preco su tam zakreslene dve cyklocesty vedla seba? A kadial teraz chodia autobusy? Dakujem
mavl (2019-09-08 16:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74230370 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3144].
mavl (2019-09-08 16:29:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74230370 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3144].
mavl (2019-09-08 16:29:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74230370 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3144].
freebeer (2019-09-10 16:26:43+00:00): hallo,
can you explain the meaning of the tag you have added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/721878429/history ?
thanks
priya6 (2019-09-11 08:54:28+00:00): I have inadvertently added the tag. I have corrected the changes pertaining to tag in question.Apologies for the inconvenience caused due to my action and looking forward to your suggestion/feedback in future as well. I'll pay closer attention to these things.

Regards,
priya
!bm (2019-09-06 11:26:57+00:00): Hey Joshua!
First of all, welcome to OSM! Concerning your repeated entry (this one and changeset #74149116) of "Neue Republik Reger", please refer to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6596758439 . As user kartonage correctly commented in note #1914165, it's already been mapped (and also in greater detail). Maybe you did not find it, because it had another, similar, but (as I believe:) wrong name "Neue Republik Burger" instead of "...Reger" or because it is categorized as fast_food, not restaurant? Anyhow, I've looked at their website, confirmed the other data, changed name and added kitchen-times in changeset #74153038. For given reasons your entry will be removed (again).
You may want to adjust your search filters and/or use another app. Please refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/ and the OSM-Wiki before making edits. If you have got any further questions concerning this, please ask! 
Best regards !bm
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-09-06 08:48:39+00:00): Правка удалена.

Во-первых, не нужно удалять и заново рисовать здание.
Во-вторых, неправильно указана адресация для домов с двойным адресом. Основной адрес заносится в теги addr:*, дополнительный – в теги addr2:*.
user_5359 (2019-09-06 11:52:06+00:00): Please don’t use abbreviation for highway names. For details read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

ct --> court
teliks (2019-09-09 14:49:19+00:00): Hi George,

Thanks for your response. I've added service roads near South La Fox Street and haven't named any roads as part of my edit. Could you please elaborate your comment about abbreviations?

Thanks,
teliks
user_5359 (2019-09-09 15:17:17+00:00): I have understood our discussion in such a way that all obvious errors are corrected. This also applies to the discussion on abbreviated street names. But if this is a misunderstanding, of course it is correct, the street was only adapted by you and not named. 

There exists an official list of the American Post for allowed abbreviations of the components of roads. I am currently using these values: 
Ave   Avenue
Blvd  Boulevard
Cir   Circle
Cmn   Comon
Ct    Court
Dr    Drive
Ln    Lane
Pkwy  Parkway
Pl    Place
Rd    Road
St    Street
Tr    Trail
Vw    View
.

In addition, there are the points of the compass, which can be before or after the name.
N  North
NE Northeast
E  East
SE Southeast
S  South
SW Southwest
W  West
NW Northwest
teliks (2019-09-11 14:49:30+00:00): Hi George,

Thanks for elaborating. I shall follow your instructions hereafter.
Looking forward to learning from you.
Regards,
teliks
pio2_122 (2019-09-06 08:36:42+00:00): Drogi, które nie są oznaczone w terenie oznaczamy tagiem unsigned_ref.
Mógłbyś to poprawić? Dzięki.
freebeer (2019-09-17 16:42:30+00:00): hallo amazon (i'm sure without checking) iD editor user,

something has gone very wrong with this changeset.

if you look below, you have updated the original version of oregon pike with a lower way number to revision 12.

just below that is v1 of a new oregon pike, which apparently is the result of an intended split of the original.  or maybe you did not intend to split the road at all.

but weirdly from the upper end of the v1 version, there was no split of the original, and the new one has been joined to the old at every original node.

you have then been adding service drives which some get attached to  only one of the ways.

this is a bug i've never known iD to create yet, but i'd seriously suggest some team leader take a look at josm as from changeset comments, i see your editors are being called out for errors at a much higher rate than i would expect, and you have been moving into relations that georg (5359) has pointed out as problematic, where iD is widely known to have weaknesses.

i am going to try to use potlatch2 to repair as much of this as i can, because another mapper failed to get anywhere with iD.  that mapper has pointed out other relation issues that i am likely to break further as i eliminate the duplicate bit by bit.

i'll try to analyse each new junction as well.
vssms (2019-10-01 08:29:59+00:00): Hi Freebeer,

Apologies for the issue and delay in response. Our editor has added a restriction instead of splitting the road into a dual carriage way. By the time we understood the problem there were multiple changes that had happened in this location which stopped us from making any further changes. Going forward we will try to be extra careful. 

Let us know your suggestion.

Regards,
Sachin
freebeer (2019-09-22 19:21:34+00:00): see comment added to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74160760
which this much smaller changeset overlaps and conflicts.
gseethar (2019-09-23 17:16:23+00:00): Hi Freebeer,

I have cleaned up the segment (changeset # -74810585). There was an issue of conflict and the user missed it. I have advised the editors to be careful in handling the conflicts. Let me know your suggestions.

Regards,
Ganesh
freebeer (2019-09-22 19:19:25+00:00): hallo amazon, how is this happening?

this changeset was uploaded three minutes after another one tracing the exact same ways through a drive-through.  yet there are tagging differences between the two.

first, how can two of your mappers be working on the same thing?

second, i presume the length of time this changeset was open means it was necessary to resolve the conflicts with the older ways getting an unexpected version bump.

in this changeset, that means the upload of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74160641 has become detached, with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722414676 now being disconnected at both ends.

the corresponding way from this changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722415243 is tagged as private, which conflicts with access to the parking aisle and drive_through service drives lacking this restriction.  do you maybe mean access=customers?

there is also a difference in one-way tagging; i see no obvious prohibition to leave the drive-through or parking spaces heading north.

can you please look at cleaning things up here?  thanks.

also, i plan to clean up the iD-bug overlap in oregon pike, seen here at v13 (the original full-length) but in the other changeset at v2, which will probably mean losing the turn restrictions your team added at both ends.

however i am a little concerned about timing, with the time of day for these two changesets seeming to be morning in europe, nighttime in the us of a, and daytime east of europe.  can you give me a general idea when amazon team members can be found editing so i can schedule my work to avoid conflicts?  a timezone or utc range, plus days off, would work.  thanks.

however please look into how it is possible two different mappers can pick the very same things to add within minutes of each other, and see about spreading out duties.  thanks.
gseethar (2019-09-23 17:14:45+00:00): Hi Freebeer,

Thanks a lot for bringing this up. The 2 users have been working on the same area and had edited the segment in question. While the 2nd editor had received a conflict, the editor went ahead and gave "Keep mine" which lead to the duplication and henceforth the detaching of the initial segment. I have cleaned up the segment (changeset # -74810585).

Our team generally works from 11.30pm PST to 8.30am PST bearing few exceptions.
I have advised the editors to be careful with the conflicts and be careful with their edits.
Let me know in case you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
Ganesh
freebeer (2019-09-24 08:33:25+00:00): hoi ganesh,

thanks for the cleanup.  a few hours earlier, i cleaned up after the iD-bug overlapping way that i mentioned earlier in XXX FIXME

this was pointed out in a now-lengthy Notes discussion to be read at XXX FIXME, and my fix probably means the amazon-added turn restriction that user gpserror was trying to fix may be broken as noted in the Note.  if you could verify this against your own driver/delivery notes, that would be great.

a hint, for the ways around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722415246 (yay, this one has its own open tab) i understand there exists a subcategory of service drives as drive_through or drive_thru or something.  perhaps that is more fitting here?  i am guessing the building (unmapped?) may be a bank, as junk-food amenities i've seen have typically a single aisle.

now that link is out of the way, the FIXME above link to the Note should be https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1926655

i'm also guessing the turn restriction can be inferred from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/107564717 although the way numbers reflect newer changes (hint, i've been too long in osm when i can recognise new ways, nodes, and the 10xxx recent milestone relations by number.  also Notes approaching the two-million mark if the troll trolling the ukraine continues to spew hundreds of rubbish notes daily as usual)

either your team is a bunch of nightowls like myself, or insomniacs :-)

PST8PDT on my system tells me i'm decades away from what i grew to expect for timezones on my system (was also a BSD) but i take it UTC times are roughly 16h to 01h.  no, that can't be right.  06h to oh i give up.  08h or the 07h33 of these changesets.  i've got clocks with local time, sept.1993 aol-time, and an xdaliclock with UTC, but for the life of me i can't figure out time differences other than knowing i can expect specific insomniacs to be active during certain times of my day.

thanks for the info.  i made my edit during your normal working hours but without conflict.
Fra00 (2019-09-06 10:42:30+00:00): Bisognava trovare una soluzione, dato che il sistema dava una valanga di errori sull'edificio. È bene inserire nella relazione solamente i perimetri esterni, e taggare le murature più interne come muri. Inoltre andava anche riempita la parte sopra il portico, dato che vi è presente un edificio, e questa è la modalità migliore, a mio avviso.