piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
laznik (2020-04-25 04:17:55+00:00): Dobry den. Podla osm wiki* moze byt tag tourism=attraction ktorym ste otagovali rezervaciu Masiarsky bok pouzity len ako doplnok k hlavnemu tagu pre nejaky objekt. V tomto pripade hlavnym objektom je asi ta rezervacia, ale podla statutu/zakona do rezervacie verejnost nema vstup, takze ten tag nie je aplikovatelny. Bolo by dobre ho preto bud odstranit alebo jasnejsie ho aplikovat na vhodny objekt.

* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=attraction?uselang=en-US
muralito (2020-04-21 21:05:59+00:00): Gracias por la colaboracion.
Tene en cuenta que lo que agregaste no forma parte de la cancha de futbol que estaba mapeada.

La plaza de deportes se agrega aparte (ademas de la cancha) como un leisure=sport_centre
bingo (2020-04-22 05:37:45+00:00): Hallo FranZ-L, erstmal herzlich willkommen bei OSM. Bitte beachte bei der Benennung von Objekten das OSM Wiki. Gerade bei landuse=residential ist es nicht empfohlen einen Namen zu geben, zumal es schon einen node mit dem Namen Ziegelhütte gibt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
WoodWoseWulf (2020-04-21 22:45:49+00:00): Hi Rick!

Welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added a boat launch in this edit, which is great - valuable information for the map, but we typically use leisure=slipway for features like this rather than leisure=park.

You can read more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=slipway (the OSM wiki is a great resource!)

Make sure you reach out if you need any help!
archie (2020-04-21 21:50:39+00:00): ref comments for cs https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83415156
Grass-snake (2023-10-04 04:30:56+00:00): Добрый день, уточните пожалуйста, что это за объект?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7431572338
Возможно нужно изменить теги.
5m4u9 (2020-04-24 07:51:14+00:00): me parece que ese wetland que inunda calles de papelpampa no es un bog, sino la dispersión de agua de los canales y el de abajo esta en transición a secarse pero ya fuera del lago uru uru... como estaba al principio
5m4u9 (2020-04-24 07:56:31+00:00): en la salida de carretera no se pone el destination sino solo motorway_juntion, el destination va en la calle que sale. en el antiguo esquema exit_to creo era como pones... pero ya deprecó
5m4u9 (2020-04-24 07:58:20+00:00): no debería tener una continuidad de calle residencial iroco, porque unclasiffied?
JJIglesias (2020-04-25 07:01:21+00:00): Tienes razon en Iroco, fue al cambiar de Residencial la entrada a la mina, termino tambien Iroco, ahora los separa e Iroco es Residencial y el camino a la mina como calle Terciaria.

OSMAND aun utiliza el destination en los junction y motorway_junctions; asi q yo los sigo poniendo en todos los cruces con nombres.

Con respecto al lago Uru Uru, creo q todavia Oruro nombra toda ese area como parte de dicho lago, o al menos eso indica los carteles, yo principalmente lo que hice fue separar el area del lago del area del parque acuatico q construyo Oruro.

Slds JJ
5m4u9 (2020-04-25 21:30:41+00:00): en maxar no se ve en sentinel si, pero este año llego hasta este border, le hare llegar el borde del lago haste ESE lugar
arcanma (2020-04-24 15:46:26+00:00): Aceraces, grazie per aver iniziato a contribuire.
Il tag name dovrebbe contenere il nome proprio di un elemento, "Water Fountain" non credo sia il nome specifico di quell'oggetto. Se non c'è un nome specifico non si mette, su quel tipo di oggetto eventualmente è meglio specificare se l'acqua è potabile o no (drinking_water=*). Vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man made=water tap
Amin Saleh (2020-04-21 22:37:50+00:00): rename Shiraz neighbourhoods
eggie (2020-04-22 06:42:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

MVG,
Eggie
Aritra21r (2020-05-07 19:23:15+00:00): This playground is one of the most popular playground in South 24 pgs, West Bengal
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:45:03+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11022849 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 21:54:22+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11022850
Marcos Medeiros (2021-05-11 22:19:55+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11022924

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
BCNorwich (2020-04-22 08:53:52+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Squaring the buildings up makes the mapping look a lot more neater.
Regards Bernard.
stephankn (2020-10-04 17:58:38+00:00): you are re-tagging unpaved tracks into tertiary roads. Why? way 794576719 You also re-tagged surrounding roads. Your change-set comment is not helpful. Please give other mappers more hints about why you are doing such drastic changes and what source it is based on.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-18 16:28:52+00:00): Please don't mistag roads for any reason.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Problematic_mapping/golf
chachafish (2020-04-21 23:29:00+00:00): Howdy :) Welcome to openstreetmap and thank you for your interest in adding to the map. Just so ya know, the minimum requirements when adding addresses are, 1) street number and 2) street name. It looks like you missed the house numbers on a few of these buildings. Also, the state should be a capital "C" and a capital "O" = CO. Other than that, this all looks great. Can you go back and make the necessary corrections? If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Thanks :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
chachafish (2020-04-21 23:35:32+00:00): Howdy again :) Thanks for trying to name these schools, but this is not actually how it's done. If you look at the school buildings, you'll see nodes with the school names and other information already on the map. In OSM we only name things once, not twice. The school buildings here should not have names added to them since they are already named with a node. Can you go back and delete the names you added? If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Thanks :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
chachafish (2020-04-21 23:56:09+00:00): Excellent work! Thanks! :)
fmarier (2020-04-25 16:06:23+00:00): I fixed the phone number formatting in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84112062.
chachafish (2020-04-21 23:55:49+00:00): Thank you! :)
Andreas Binder (2020-04-22 06:36:28+00:00): Hi BeKri, Du hast hier anscheinend von einem jahrealten Luftbild abgezechnet. Das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794578652 gibts seit Jahren nicht mehr und umgekehrt sind da jezt zwei Turmgebäude und einen eigenen Solekontainer, die du in diesem Changeset gelöscht hast. Grüße Andreas
BeKri (2020-04-22 12:53:39+00:00): Servus Andreas,
Danke für den Hinweis, dann will ich das ganz schnell wieder rückgängig machen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83942432
Hab den alten Schuppen als demolished mit note eingebaut, ok für Dich ?
happy tagging derBeKri
Andreas Binder (2020-04-22 18:45:43+00:00): Ja, sieht gut aus
BeKri (2020-04-22 19:10:21+00:00): Danke ;-)
Glassman (2020-04-22 20:16:35+00:00): TIP: Instead of removing and adding a street back, just modify the existing geometry. Can you add back in the information on 3rd Ave NE that you deleted?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83904620
Frans S (2020-04-22 14:57:18+00:00): Hello Spencer.
Thanks for mapping here
A remark. You tagged paths here as footway. In these areas the tag path is more common because it can  carry all traffic except cars. 
Buildings can be identified by the shadow they give. (do not include the shadow in the mapping)
I removed several mappings which you tagged as building which were trees or other objects.
1 object , a courtyard did you map as building as well. No shadow, no building.
No need to map paths which ends in the middle of nowhere.
Best regards and keep mapping
gscholz (2020-04-24 04:39:48+00:00): Hi Carlos,
this changeset has added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-98.81422&lat=24.99883&zoom=12&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

Guido
gscholz (2020-04-24 04:39:53+00:00): Hi Carlos,
this changeset has added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-98.81422&lat=24.99883&zoom=12&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

Guido
Allison P (2020-04-22 14:15:38+00:00): I've been trying to find a name for this canal for quite some time; where did you find it?
wadedorrell (2020-04-22 17:31:07+00:00): "Spoil Banks" appears in a 2020 preliminary plat for Greenbanks Sub I was reviewing. USGS map for Eagle ID, as old as 1953, also label it as "Spoil Banks." There are recent refs in Boise PDS memos, since the canal's of concern in Northwest neighborhood planning, and ACHD plans, although sometimes as "Spoils Bank" or "Spoils Banks."
Scubababe (2020-04-22 14:36:12+00:00): Dive point dive center is still listed, its closed
GOwin (2020-04-23 01:09:30+00:00): Are you checking that from OpenStreetMap? 

The status has been changed in OpenStreetMap, but other apps downstream could be delayed with updating their databases.
Scubababe (2020-04-23 19:10:52+00:00): I am looking on maps.me 
Thank you for your help!
GOwin (2020-04-23 22:53:08+00:00): If you're interested in offline mapping app that uses OpenStreetMap that updates more frequently, try OsmAnd.

Personally, I recommend the community-maintained version in F-Droid.org.

Thank you for your feedback.
Scubababe (2020-04-24 11:43:05+00:00): Well, I was actually requested by my employer to have it removed from maps.me bc the location closed.  I could not edit it on maps.me and the instructions told me to manage it on OSM and it would update on maps.me shortly after.  Have I gone about this incorrectly?
GOwin (2020-04-25 00:42:07+00:00): The data that your app uses comes from OpenStreetMap, and the said establishment has been deleted from the database.

For now, tell your employer to check OpenStreetMap, or use OsmAnd. There's nothing you can do with maps.me until their next update.

In the future, you can edit and update the data direct on OpenStreetMap, and rest assured that all other downstream apps will *eventually* get updated -- with some quicker than others.

Stay healthy and keep safe.
Kovoschiz (2020-04-22 10:11:52+00:00): Should it not be `building:levels=41`, including the podium base?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83907929
DP24PH (2020-04-22 03:36:13+00:00): Pardon for your disturbance, but the changeset boundary may encroach the parts of the Republic of the Philippines. The only recommendation is to fully disclose the location of the changeset involved, and if possible, reduce the size of the changeset boundary. Anyways, be safe always, and keep on mapping.

DEARPAUL24
Akhil_vas (2020-04-22 03:50:37+00:00): Hi DearpaulPH , thanks for the information and Identification I will ensure to reduce the changeset size going forward.Happy Mapping.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-10 15:13:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102703272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers in Saudi Arabia.
Kovoschiz (2020-04-22 10:16:51+00:00): Don't tag an extra `building=*` into it if it is a part of a structure. It would be considered a `building:part=` or `indoor=`.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83909308
Kovoschiz (2020-04-22 10:18:32+00:00): Can you explain if it is not a flush toilet? Don't tag for the renderer to "change icon".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83909478
Frans S (2020-05-13 10:54:04+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping here
Please pay more attention to accurate mapping and squaring the buildings you map. Use the tag building-yes as default.
See thise page how your mappings looked
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83909653
And do not forget to solve the issues which comes up before you upload your work
Best regards
mariotomo (2020-11-23 19:19:56+00:00): que contribución tan interesante esta del "canal-río".  cuando haces cosas así, coméntalas en el grupo, para recibir comentarios, para hacer publicidad de algo que no todos conocen, para socializar los éxitos.
CoyKoi (2020-04-22 04:57:39+00:00): I would say it's an optimistic stretch to tag these streets as cyclestreets, my reading of cyclestreet is that a bike should expect priority over cars - either legally or by signage and infrastructure.

If the goal is to map AT's quiet cycling routes, these would be best added as relations, for example the dominion road safe cycle streets relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5547747

These route relations can be seen as a blue highlight, when switched onto the 'Cycle Map' layer on openstreetmap.org
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83910321
CoyKoi (2020-04-22 05:02:40+00:00): Also, you seem to have accidentally dragged a footway node from the Domain over onto wellesley street, I have reversed this with changeset 83912579
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83910321
callum_AT (2020-04-24 00:53:29+00:00): Thanks for fixing the footway node issue - definitely an accident. Regarding route relations, how would these apply when the portion of route is quite small and not connected to a wider network?
CoyKoi (2020-04-27 03:40:47+00:00): As long as a feature (be it a segment of road, path through a park, pathway between residential blocks) is part of a named route, it can be part of the relation. It doesn't necessarily need to be directly connected to the other features in the relation, or to a wider network.

I would say that AT's local quiet cycling routes are a textbook example of the "Local cycling routes" described on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route

Some have already been added and are in states of disrepair, for example the Dom rd east cycle route I linked to above
Mashin (2021-02-23 04:31:59+00:00): This one was probably supposed to be attached to something

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7432177407
clay_c (2021-02-23 04:43:15+00:00): No, it's in the correct place.
Frans S (2020-04-22 12:49:30+00:00): Hello Pabryan Thanks for mapping here>
your mapping of buildings is fine and accurate. You overlooked some round buildings (appr 10) which I mapped.
Always look for buildings in areas where human activity can be seen. In the bush or woods you hardly find buildings.
Best is to zoom high (20-30 mtr) and scroll up and down slowly in strokes>
About Highways. 
There is no need to map every meter of a path, When buildings are in sight of a highway, no need to map it. Also short pieces 10 mtr fi. not needed.
You mapped a wide road on the right side on top and tagged it as a tertiary road. Tag Tertiary = reserved for main road connecting and leading to towns and villages. Unclassified is a more appropriate tag in these areas. even as wide as 2 mtr. . See this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa?source=post_page---------------------------

Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2020-04-22 11:36:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You didn't close same area (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794623659). Please notice also the difference between description and name. A street is dirt but doesn't have the name "Dirt road".
Frans S (2020-05-03 09:33:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You mapped quite a lot of buildings here.
Please be sure to square all the rectangular buildings with the Q key. ( you missed 15 out of >200)
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83912625
kayle (2020-04-22 11:37:27+00:00): Zdravím,
čo je to presne za objekt? Kaplnka alebo...?
Pretože označenie len "place_of_worship" je nič nehovoriace.
A objekt už je podobne skoro 4 roky podobne označený - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/672081107
mingo23 (2020-04-28 07:29:54+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che hai cambiato in modo massivo qualche centinaio di nomi in seguito a queste note anonime che sono state aperte recentemente. 
Ci sono alcune cose che andrebbero discusse prima di essere fatte, ad es:
- che cosa va nel tag name e che cosa va in altri tag (sostituire il name e basta è sbagliato a prescindere)
- le note sono anonime e andrebbero verificate: hai controllato se ISTAT indica davvero i nomi segnalati?
- una modifica massiva come questa va prima discussa con la comunità.

Ho aperto una discussione in mailing list su questo: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2020-April/069563.html
Ti chiederei se possibile di rispondere alla discussione, in modo che si arrivi a una soluzione che vada bene a tutti.
Grazie.
Kovoschiz (2020-04-22 10:24:14+00:00): Please don't remove wrongly tagged information by deleting it only.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83913071
aceman444 (2020-05-10 21:02:16+00:00): Hi, what is landuse=woodland? Di you mean landuse=forest?
chachafish (2020-04-23 05:44:26+00:00): Hello, thank you for your edits. Just so you know, if you don't remove all construction tags, it shows up as an error ;)
manitec (2020-04-24 03:50:08+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for identifying the miss here and informing me about it. Apologies for the partial edit. I've corrected the tags under changeset #(84032309)
Regards,
manitec
chachafish (2020-04-24 03:53:56+00:00): Cheers :)
antoalvi (2020-04-22 06:36:36+00:00): “#MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
lmagreault (2020-04-26 14:08:06+00:00): On vire le SIRET aussi ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83918138
mapman44 (2020-04-22 13:22:27+00:00): Thanks for adding the buildings but they'll look better if you square them up. It's easy...just select and press the Q key.
zstadler (2021-06-26 19:58:00+00:00): Hi Tal,

Is the no-entry from Weizmann to Narkisim still effect?

Thanks,
Zeev
stephankn (2020-07-08 09:43:23+00:00): You are adding here details down to a very high resolution. Unfortunately the available imagery is not well suitable for this detail. While on Esri the parking lots roughly match what you mapped, they don't on other imagery sources. 
Be aware that especially the imagery from satellites often has an offset and other distortions. In other parts of the world exists high resolution ortho-photos with sub-10cm resolution. These might allow such kind of detail. With the the 60+cm resolution available here the mapped data might be discarded once it turns out to be off.

Are you trying  to map in a way it "looks nice" on the rendered map? Please try not to do this. There are many different map styles in use. And what you think looks nice on one might look horrible on another.
majkaz (2020-06-15 14:08:54+00:00): Prosím tě, v přechodech pro chodce je sice zmatek, ale crossing=controlled neexistuje.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:crossing
Existuje crossing=uncontrolled, které říká že je tam jen zebra na silnici, nic jiného. StreetComplete, které si jede podle svého a ignoruje zavedené značení, na takové cpe "marked". U té Otýlie tam jsou světla, takže tam patří crossíng=traffic_signals, ostatní se dá nacpat do dalších značek k přechodu.
Je blbost tohle dávat do fixme. Buď to zdokumentuj komplet, nebo to tam nedávej, a nech jen ten přechod.
sokol15 (2020-06-15 14:19:40+00:00): To byla chyba a zdánlivá nemožnost otagovat vše v GoMap. Kouknu na to a opravím.
daganzdaanda (2020-09-05 21:38:33+00:00): Hallo Skarabaeus, schön, dass du kleine Wege einträgst!
Allerdings habe ich hier auf keinem Luftbild etwas entdeckt, was ich als offiziellen "highway=cycleway" bezeichnen würde. Schau dir vielleicht noch mal das WIki zu diesem tag und auch highway=footway oder track an. Wenn man irgendwo über eine Wiese oder einen Acker gehen kann, ist das noch nicht automatisch ein Fußweg, höchstens vielleicht ein Pfad (path), evtl mit "informal=yes".
Skarabaeus (2020-09-05 22:40:00+00:00): Hallo daganzdaanda,
schön daß Du Dich mit kleinen Dingen auhc auseinandersetzt. Es handelt sich hier um einen kleinen Wanderpfad, der mit Brücken entlang der Amper führt. Es handelt sich also nicht um einen Pfad bei dem ich eine Wiese quere, sondern um einen Wanderpfad für Fußgänger und Radfahrer. Es wird dort auch geritten, allerdings dann im Bereich der hölzernen Brücken etwas anders. Ich habe auch keine Attribute hinzugefügt, sondern lediglicxh schmaler Weg ausgewählt. Es ist übrigens meine Hausstrecke und wenn Du auf Komoot schaust, findest Du die Beschreibung dazu.
Parzelle13 (2020-09-06 08:30:33+00:00): Ein reiner Radweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794670756), den nur Radfahrer benutzen dürfen, welcher aber nur über reine Fußwege, welche nur durch Fußgänger benutzt werden dürfen. erreichbar ist. Sinnvoll?
Parzelle13 (2020-09-06 08:34:14+00:00): Nachtrag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
daganzdaanda (2020-09-06 09:52:54+00:00): Servus Skarabaeus, 
danke für die Antwort! Ja, ich bin beim umeinanderscrollen über den kleinen blauen Fahrradweg in der Mitte von nirgendwo "gestolpert" ;-)
 
So wie du es beschreibst, würde ich für die ganzen Wegehier  "highway=path" (bei iD: "schmaler Weg") benutzen, und die Details mit zusätzlichen Tags ergänzen. Zur Zeit sind es Fußwege (die roten) und ein Fahrradweg (blau). Schau dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=footway?uselang=de und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=de an, das passt doch nicht so recht... 

Ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath ist "...ein schmaler Weg für den nicht motorisierten Verkehr. Damit werden Gehwege, Wanderwege, Trampelpfade, Fahrradwege, Reitwege, Viehwege und Wege, die mehrere dieser Zwecke erfüllen, kartiert. Üblicherweise sind weitere Attribute (access=*, surface=*, width=* usw.) angegeben. Das schließt auch Wege mit ein, die nicht gezielt angelegt wurden und für deren Erhalt niemand aufkommt – diese werden mit informal=yes kenntlich gemacht (z.B. Trampelpfade)."
 
Für MTB gibt es weitere tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Mountain_biking

Mit iD musst du manche speziellen Tags vielleicht unten bei "Eigenschaften" direkt eingeben.

Viel Spaß weiterhin beim "Pfad-finden" und mappen :-)