piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Euskirchener (2016-07-08 10:43:52+00:00): Hallo nochmal,
hier gibt es ebenfalls ein Problem: du hast ein Fußballfeld hinzugefügt. Hierbei ist aber das Problem, dass du den Namen „soccer field“ vergeben hast. Das ist aus mehreren Gründen nicht richtig. 1. der Name ist in englischer Sprache, obwohl wir hier in Deutschland sind. 2. der Name beschreibt nur die Nutzung des Platzes, ist aber kein Eigenname. Sowas geht nicht. Durch das Tag "sport=soccer" ist bereits angegeben, dass es sich hier um einen Fußballplatz handelt. Nur wenn der Platz wirklich einen Eigennamen hat (der zum Beispiel durch ein Schild vor Ort angezeigt wird), darf ein Name vergeben werden, ansonsten nicht. Ein anderes Beispiel: Wenn du ein Restaurant hinzufügst (mit dem Tag "amenity=restaurant"), ist es nicht erlaubt, schlichtweg den Namen „Restaurant“ zu vergeben. Nur wenn ein Eigenname existiert, darf dieser gesetzt werden. Ich bitte dich also, den Namen wieder zu löschen. Das selbe gilt für die anderen Änderungen (dort habe ich auch einen Kommentar hinterlassen).

Gruß, CorrectMapper
Euskirchener (2016-07-08 10:44:45+00:00): selbes Problem wie hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40544671) bereits besprochen: Bitte Namen löschen!
Euskirchener (2016-07-08 10:45:08+00:00): selbes Problem wie hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40544671) bereits besprochen: Bitte Namen löschen!
user_5359 (2016-07-07 18:55:48+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM. Das Schulgelände wird normalerweise mit amenity=school gekennzeichnet, wenn das nicht bekannt ist ersatzweise das Gebäude, wenn diese nicht erfasst wurde, dann der Adressknoten.
Automata123 (2016-07-08 08:16:14+00:00): Alles klar, vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
naoliv (2016-07-17 01:08:58+00:00): Skalimov, não é correto criar restrições de "proibido retornar" na mesma rua (ou seja, quando a origem e destino é a própria via)
Skalimov (2016-07-18 19:25:29+00:00): ok
Fraxi (2026-03-27 18:39:01+00:00): Здравей!
Каква е моментната ситуация с https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/212128654/ ?
Hjart (2016-07-08 09:19:45+00:00): Wikipedia & wikidata links er det bedst kun at have på ét enkelt OSM-objekt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Using_Wikipedia_links (5. pkt).
Jeg har set du har lavet samme nummer som her på f.eks. jernbanelinier og jeg tror det er en god ide at få det rettet.
AE35 (2016-07-08 09:27:26+00:00): Broen er ikke en relation - hvor Wikipedia/wikidata kan sættes på - desuden er står der " extensive feature encompassing" er tre  vejsegmenter  mange da?
Hjart (2016-07-08 09:36:10+00:00): Jeg har lavet en passende relation nu. (se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels).

Det er ikke et spørgsmål om hvorvidt det er "mange", men om hvorvidt der er mere end én.
AE35 (2016-07-08 10:04:41+00:00): Ikke enig 2 er ikke extentivsive - men  folk på Wiki'en er vel galt på den igen -
Andrea Musuruane (2016-07-10 10:53:11+00:00): Ciao, 
puoi spiegare cosa volevi indicare con access=designated? Perché così come è messo non ha molto senso. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access

Inoltre, anche le highway=living_street con motor_vehicle=no hanno poco senso.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway

Tra l'altro le living street devono sempre essere indicate in loco da apposito cartello:
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Italian_traffic_signs_-_zona_residenziale.svg

Riesci a spiegarmi che correggiamo? 

Grazie.

Ciao,

Andrea
LaniusCollurio (2016-07-11 10:31:59+00:00): Ciao
access=designated?
volevo inserire delle ZTL: cosa è meglio utilizzare?
highway=living_street con motor_vehicle=no 
questa è una strada larga circa 3m chiusa con una sbarra e con accesso solo pedonale
Andrea Musuruane (2016-07-11 10:44:32+00:00): Ciao,
> access=designated?
>volevo inserire delle ZTL: cosa è meglio utilizzare?

Come esempio puoi vedere come ho mappato la ZTL a Santhià:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33000444

access=no (diciamo che l'accesso è sempre vietato)
bicycle=yes (con la bici puoi sempre transitare)
motor_vehicle:conditional=yes @ (Mo-Sa 05:30-12:00) (le fasce orarie in cui puoi transitare con un veicolo a motore: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions)
oneway=yes (perché quando puoi transitare con un veicolo, la strada è a senso unico)

> highway=living_street con motor_vehicle=no
> questa è una strada larga circa 3m chiusa con una sbarra e con accesso solo pedonale

La sbarra deve essere mappata con un punto sulla strada con barrier=lift_gate:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:barrier

Se l'accesso è solo pedonale (ovvero le macchine non possono entrare perché c'è divieto, anche dal lato dove non c'è la sbarra), allora si deve mettere highway=pedestrian.

Ciao e buon mapping!

Andrea
LaniusCollurio (2016-07-11 11:31:41+00:00): Ma se la ZTL sempre con accesso sempre vietato ad esclusione di chi ha il permesso non è meglio usare motor_vehicle:destination

Ho messo la barriera mentre dall'altro lato c'è solo un divieto d'accesso ai non residenti: a questo punto classificherei la strada come residential e non come living

giusto?
Andrea Musuruane (2016-07-11 11:47:58+00:00): Ciao,

> Ma se la ZTL sempre con accesso sempre vietato ad esclusione di chi ha il permesso non è meglio usare motor_vehicle:destination

In vecchie discussioni era emerso che in questo caso è meglio mettere motor_vehicle=private (e toglierei access=no).

E, se possono passare le bici, aggiungerei bicycle=yes.

> Ho messo la barriera mentre dall'altro lato c'è solo un divieto d'accesso ai non residenti: a questo punto classificherei la strada come residential e non come living

> giusto?

OK!

Ciao,

Andrea
martinum4 (2020-09-06 10:46:11+00:00): Fixme:"<access=private> erscheint mir hier merkwürdig. Ist nicht eher <access=no> + <bus=designated> richtig? "

Finde nein, da man bei der KVG Überfahrrechte für Linienbusse kaufen kann, das dürfte auch Fernbusanbieter betreffen: https://www.kvg.de/fileadmin/kvg-ks/dokumente/unternehmen/Netznutzungsbedingungen/KVG-Entgeltliste_ver%C3%B6ff_190708.pdf
user_18526234 (2023-03-02 15:36:16+00:00): Hello militrik,
I seems that you have added an man_made=flowerbed:
https://www.osm.org/way/429701413
    
I recently started documenting and using landcover=flowerbed as an alternative to the controversial landuse=flowerbed. 
  
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=flowerbed
  
Would you mind it if I change this objects tag from man_made=flowerbed to landcover=flowerbed? Or even better would be if you change it to show support to landcover=flowerbed.
Please let me know what you think.
  
Best regards,
Tjuro
emergency99 (2016-07-08 13:59:22+00:00): Auch hier. Vorerst eher auf shop=vacant umtaggen. denn die Lokale sind ja nicht implodiert....
emergency99 (2016-07-08 13:56:45+00:00): Hier wäre eine Survey aber nicht schlecht. Also ich hätte die node auf shop=vacant gesetzt. Weil das Geschäftslokal gibt es sicherlich sehr wohl noch. Nur wohl leer!
emergency99 (2016-07-08 14:40:24+00:00): Da kommt bald ein Spar rein. Ich bitte dich, vor solchen mechanische Edits (auch wenn du es 100 Mal einzeln machst ist das noch immer ein Mechanischer Edit) bitte solche nodes nicht löschen, sondern nur auf Vacant ändern.
Andreas Binder (2016-07-07 18:57:33+00:00): Fix: Fix: Herreninsel auf Herreninsel umbenannt. Herrenchiemsee ist das neue Schloss und nicht die Insel
ff5722 (2016-07-07 18:12:45+00:00): Have you checked 'Raw GPS data' at the top of the JOSM download dialog? It will fetch GPS traces from OSM (if available), so that you can see possible offset.
Andreas Binder (2016-07-07 18:56:54+00:00): Fix: Herreninsel auf Herreninsel umbenannt. Herrenchiemsee ist das neue Schloss und nicht die Insel
Vintagejhan (2016-07-09 09:31:49+00:00): 讚啦! 果然還是用批次修改比較快~
GerdP (2017-08-25 08:44:39+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=byway_open_to_all_traffic
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429723068
Guess you refer to 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbyway
James Derrick (2017-08-27 18:11:30+00:00): This was a pre-existing typo, likely between designation= and highway.
This change set fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37651458 but left this short stub as it was.
Both are now updated following: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_access_provisions#England_and_Wales
poornibadrinath (2016-07-08 14:33:48+00:00): Hi, AdamLin.
   Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. However, the streets that you were adding didn't have proper tags or missing the tags for highways altogether. Please do note that all the entities that are mapped on OpenStreetMap should have appropriate tags. Please do refer the tagging system of OSM on how to add tags. There is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
Constable (2016-07-08 09:56:09+00:00): hey sir, what's the real name of that thing? We are in Italy, the map must show Italian names, not Russian translations.
Thanks
Tomas Straupis (2016-07-08 12:05:39+00:00): In Lithuania tertiary is always unpaved, secondary - always paved. Fixed that near „Stakiai“.
GinaroZ (2016-07-07 21:07:43+00:00): Hi, there's a fixme on this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172058802 - I assume this has been sorted?
Red Kobold (2016-07-08 08:13:48+00:00): Hi, The fixme is unclear about what needs fixed so I left it. I only changed the speed limit.
GinaroZ (2016-07-08 14:55:28+00:00): It was added in this changeset, seems to have been a conversion from a node to a way http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=13963482
Red Kobold (2016-07-08 17:51:07+00:00): If he means that the existence of the street needs to be confirmed, then yes it exists. It is also in the right place with the correct tags and node links.
Red Kobold (2016-07-11 18:03:43+00:00): Confirmed by survey today!
RSergei (2016-07-13 17:39:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Рад что вы начали рисовать в ОСМ. Но вы торопитесь двигать чужие тропы под спутниковый снимок. Все спутниковые снимки смещены, поэтому необходимо использовать треки для выравнивания спутникового снимка и треков. Прочитайте статью: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков   она очень важна!
Glenn Plas (2016-07-07 20:54:01+00:00): Hallo,

Er is geen nood om de postcode in te vullen op adressen.  Deze worden dmv postalcode boundaries bepaald.

Mvg, Glenn
rickmastfan67 (2016-07-08 01:09:52+00:00): Just so you know, these are emergency access roads for fire departments and the police so they can access the PA Turnpike network quickly between interchanges, They are almost never 'oneway=yes', and should be tagged as 'oneway=no' instead.
rickmastfan67 (2016-07-08 01:13:48+00:00): So, in the future, just take 5 seconds to look at the Bing imagery.  If you see a 'gate' on any point of the ramp in the imagery, 99.9% chance it should be 'oneway=no', especially if the highway it connects to is a toll highway.  Also, the 'white' lines on each side of the ramp are a dead giveaway that it's 2-way, and not oneway.
samely (2016-07-11 16:03:59+00:00): Hey there!
I removed the oneway tag so you can, please, fix it! Thanks for your very clear explanation about this kind of access.
vademecum (2016-07-15 16:25:31+00:00): Hallo, Du hast auf Ohlsdorf nahe Kapelle 10 ein amenity=place_of_worship / name=RAFFY eingetragen. Worum handelt es sich dabei? Ist das ein Grab? Private Gräber werden in die Datenbank nicht eingetragen, nur wenige Prominentengräber, und diese auch nicht so, wie du das getan hast. In diesem Fall lösche den Node bitte bzw. ändere ihn entsprechend ab. Hier erfährst du mehr: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Friedhofmapping

Viele Grüße
vademecum
nammala (2016-07-08 05:59:34+00:00): Hi AdamLin,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap(OSM). Your edits look good and also don't delete without conforming them because OSM has several users. The road edits looks great but you need to tag the roads before uploading to OSM. You can follow the classification of road tagging by this wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway.

cheers,
krishna
user_5359 (2016-07-08 04:44:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is the aerial images of the area correct? Can I delete the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12586314 and add the existing roads from the images?
user_5359 (2016-07-08 04:47:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265301987 ? I think you add this the wrong building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265301998, too. Please cleanup.

If you need help: You are welcome
user_5359 (2016-09-17 16:17:51+00:00): I have reverted your changeset.
Hjart (2016-07-08 07:09:45+00:00): Geodatastyrelsen is the recommended imagery when mapping in Denmark (it's newer and you can see details not visible in Bing imagery).
Also the name you came up with for the farm sounds very "constructed" and strange to a danish ear, so I have changed it to what I found on the webpage (the danish version).
PlaneMad (2016-07-08 16:57:39+00:00): Hi, you have changed the name of the village from 'Čachnov' to '2'. Looks like a mistake, if you want, I can help revert back to the original name.
Miroslav Peška (2016-07-08 21:48:37+00:00): Hi, you are right, I accidentally renamed the place instead of just my bookmark. Thank you for letting me know, it's now back to the original (correct) name.
PlaneMad (2016-07-09 04:31:33+00:00): Excellent, thanks.
maraf24 (2016-07-08 20:48:47+00:00): You've change location of one of the peaks. 
What's the source for data?
Why the changeset comment is empty?
praeteritum (2024-02-04 05:29:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147041275.
user_5359 (2016-07-08 04:50:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please mark the area as construction. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction
maraf24 (2016-07-12 22:30:07+00:00): Prosiłbym o większą uwagę przy edycji ulic, w szczególności o niekasowanie i nie zmienianie ich nazw.
GinaroZ (2016-07-07 22:35:33+00:00): Are you sure that's the correct location? There's already another museum of childrood nearby...
trigpoint (2016-07-08 08:23:36+00:00): The museum of childhhood is where previously mapped at #42. I visited it last year.
This maps.me edit is a duplicate, in the wrong place and should be removed.
MikeN (2016-07-08 02:04:30+00:00): Hi, Thank you for the fix.   White Horse Road Extension is mostly 2 lanes, with only a tiny part with a left turn lane.

Also, some of the turn:lanes:forward tag is blank, which does not match the turn lane tagging in Wiki
samely (2016-07-11 16:14:03+00:00): Hey there!
I've already fixed the number of lanes in all the road. Thanks for your feedback.
user_5359 (2016-07-08 04:55:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
arvdk (2017-08-28 13:20:58+00:00): I have opened a note about something you edited. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1119721
kartler175 (2016-07-18 10:52:19+00:00): Bitte mehrfach angelegt Straßen bereinigen! 
Routen benötigen keine neuen Straßen.
JOSM-Validator benutzen!
MKnight (2016-07-29 22:41:29+00:00): ich glaube, an einfachsten wäre alles zu reverten: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=12&lat=51.4315&lon=9.5869&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTT&item=1230&level=&tags=&fixable=
martinum4 (2016-08-01 20:59:11+00:00): Hallo, die B80 ist in Reinhardshagen immer noch doppelt, bitte mal fixen!
MKnight (2016-08-01 21:28:39+00:00): revert, ja oder nein? ...
kartler175 (2016-08-02 11:29:57+00:00): Zumindest dei überflüssigen Strßen müssen weg. Da der Ersteller sich anscheinend nicht mehr kümmert, bleibt wohl nichts anderes übrig.
MKnight (2016-08-03 10:05:18+00:00): bin dran. werde allerdings nur löschen, nicht die relationen übernehmen. (zumindest vorerst nicht)
MKnight (2016-08-03 12:20:40+00:00): Wege und Relationen gelöscht in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41213099
Hab noch ein paar übersehen, die hole ich noch nach.
naoliv (2016-09-20 13:40:13+00:00): Everton, esses dados foram obtidos de onde?
E como foram inseridos no mapa?
EvertonBortolini (2016-09-21 01:09:09+00:00): Os dados foram obtidos por meio da metologia de cartografia social para um inventário turístico. O trabalho de coleta envolveu a comunidade, bem como os integrantes da Incubadora Tecnológica de Cooperativas Populares (ITCP-UFPR) da qual faço parte. Os dados coletados geraram um mapa turístico em papel e um webmapa. Além disso, os dados foram adicionados ao OpenStreetMap a partir de dois arquivos shapefiles utilizando a ferramenta Potlatch 2.
EvertonBortolini (2016-09-21 01:10:51+00:00): Qualquer dúvida entre em contato comigo pelos email evertonbortolini@hotmail.com ou evertonbertanbortolini@gmail.com
SomeoneElse (2019-07-13 13:14:39+00:00): Just for info, someone's added a new bar here as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6512253586 - is that the new name for the one that you added?
Best Regards,
Andy
aharvey (2019-07-14 00:25:46+00:00): Yeah you're right, thank for spotting. I just fixed it.
piligab (2016-08-10 22:55:09+00:00): Good night Longhorn256:
Adding turn lanes is correctly?
Because turn lanes in satellite imagery are not coinciding with your mapping, also the turn lanes is incorrectly starting.

Nice to meet you.
Longhorn256 (2016-08-14 15:05:30+00:00): Upon review of your comment, I have modified a few objects, however I don't think it would satisfy your question. I know it looks strange in places, but I preserved the original TIGER data and I am trying to make it as simple as possible to not confuse future mappers when they go to edit. It would create a lot of additional points to map out every lane transition. If you have any questions please contact me again. By all means, update and edit the map to how you see fit.
jonwit (2017-10-06 13:05:44+00:00): gracias. Thank you for updating. I drew this a while ago and came back to see if it got removed from the activity from hurricanes and its still there!! hopefully google/mapquest/yahoo will put it in now.
user_5359 (2016-07-08 04:27:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2016-07-08 04:29:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't delete existing streets. Add the existing access tag and information like max_length or max_weight
schleuss (2016-07-10 17:19:52+00:00): awesome add!
SomeoneElse (2016-07-15 00:57:17+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_5359 (2016-07-08 04:31:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! On the aerial images I can't see any shelter only a residential building (building=yes). Please correct your work. 

If you need help: You are welcome.
praeteritum (2024-02-04 05:29:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147041273.
praeteritum (2024-02-03 15:56:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147025247.
praeteritum (2024-02-03 15:56:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 147025230.
nicolas17 (2016-07-18 04:31:46+00:00): No sé si sabías que estás editando el mapa real que ve todo el mundo... Cualquiera puede hospedarse en lo del tío lucho? :)
Supaplex (2016-07-16 04:03:13+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Panko kale Ty (2016-07-08 06:10:32+00:00): DWKB-FM 99.3
Dmytro O (2016-11-20 07:21:56+00:00): Уверен, что тут 110?
mavl (2016-07-08 17:28:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. У вас территория является одновременно и школьной, и промышленной. Как это может быть?  
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75616838  
  
После этого пакета правок стало две школы № 31.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75619037/history  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75616838/history
Владимир К (2016-07-08 10:27:20+00:00): формат номе ра неверный
chnav (2016-07-08 12:13:25+00:00): персональная закладка. удалено.
chnav (2016-07-08 12:17:32+00:00): Исправил название села обратно. Бульте аккуратнее.
Warin61 (2019-02-09 04:31:31+00:00): Hi,
Tower Hill changed from isolated dwelling back to locality .. cannot see a building here.
kayle (2016-07-14 06:48:56+00:00): Zdravím, addr:housenumber (číslo domu) by som skôr dal na konkrétnu budovu, ktorá to číslo má a nie na celú plochu družstva.
mavl (2016-07-08 16:38:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы удалили довольно много данных без поясняющего комментария к пакету правок. Комментарий «Обновление» ничего не сообщает. Источник правок source=Bing. Напишите, пожалуйста, почему были удалены следующие объекты?  
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1445467551/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2286371623/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2286371624/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2286371625/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2286371626/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2286371627/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2286371628/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2544542058/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2974488134/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2974488139/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2974488147/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2974488151/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2974488175/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2974519191/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2974519201/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2982458096/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2982458097/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2982458100/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2982464855/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2982464856/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3594536267/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3594536268/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219486500/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293871972/history
mavl (2016-07-08 16:40:37+00:00): Почему название школы «средняя общеобразовательная школа № 4» было заменено на менее подробное «Средняя школа №4»?
mavl (2016-07-08 17:17:45+00:00): Почему у Зырянки изменён статус с village на hamlet? Прочитайте, пожалуйста, статью [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:place].
desk77 (2016-07-11 03:59:22+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Название «Средняя общеобразовательная школа № 4» было переименовано чтобы сократить название. У Зарянки статус в википедии  установлен как деревня, а не село.
mavl (2016-07-11 04:24:29+00:00): Названия не нужно сокращать. Если школа называется «средняя общеобразовательная школа № 4» (на табличке, на своём сайте), то она так и должна называться в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Зырянка, действительно, имеет официальный статус «Деревня». Это указано в законе субъекта Российской Федерации (в данном случае это закон Тюменской области от 05.11.2004 № 263 в редакции от 11.06.2015). Официальный статус указывается в теге official_status. Для Зырянки имеем official_status=ru:деревня [http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/266513250]. Так что всё было правильно. Вам ничего не нужно было менять. Значение тега place не связано жёстко с официальным статусом. Оно зависит больше от численности населения, чем от статуса.  
  
Вы удалили точки интереса и перенесли их теги на здания. Это правильно. Но отдельные точки интереса это тоже правильно. Заменив одно на другое, вы не улучшили данные. Есть участники, которые наоборот переносят теги на отдельные точки интереса. Вы переобозначаете на свой вкус. Они переобозначают на свой. В итоге этой бесполезной войны правок данные никак не улучшаются. Причём ни вы, ни другие участники этой войны правок не являетесь местными жителями.
Protoxenus (2020-07-21 15:51:36+00:00): Hi, du hast an das Ortseingangsschild Rechlin von Süden kommenD: "Rechlin, Alte Post" geschrieben. Kann ich mir nicht vorstellen, das das Stimmt.
Gruß Protoxenus