piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SHARCRASH (2022-01-10 17:04:00+00:00): La relation porte le type=site et elle rassemble les différentes éléments les plus importants tel que les ouvrages facilement identifiables. Eux ne sont certainement pas virtuels. 

La Ligne Maginot était supposée être une ligne continue de combat et d'infrastructures. Les lignes que tu dis virtuelles, certaines sont des tunnels mais n'ont pas le tag highway (exemple: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223048986 ) et donc ne sont pas rendus sur la carte (un choix je suppose), d'autres sont des lignes de combat avec tourelles cachées, terrain accidenté voir, pièges à tank, bunkers, etc.  Au delà de ça, les lignes encore droites servent de référence entre 2 postes pour aider les gens à retrouver d'autres éléments, d'où le "fixme=to be completed".

La Ligne Maginot est l'antithèse de la Ligne Siegfried AKA Westwall. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1629004 Cette relation englobe également tout types d'élément, même les lignes de combat "virtuelles". Eux ont choisi d'utiliser la valeur "collection" pour la clé de relation "type" mais c'est un valeur qui n'a aucune information établie dans le Wiki.
SekeRob (2021-12-22 14:24:22+00:00): Hi

Whatever 'x' is supposed to mean as comprehensible comment, your merging of 3 farmland sections into a single multi-polygon broke the integrity. "layer: duplicate_segment
obj_type:	r obj_id:	13578336"
Also your merging lost the history of what it was before.... there's no telling which part was corn and which cereal or why this land is tagged as fallow, meaning there's no active agriculture on this land for several years. The last imagery of ESRI suggests the land is in use. Did you survey to confirm the state is 'not-in-use'? Neither Bing shows this as in disuse.

ciao
ataxit (2021-12-22 19:49:48+00:00): Hi SekeRob,
sorry for the x - laziness doesnt pay off. Also i'm not very familiar with multi-polygons, but I never added tags like fallow. Very tricky... thanks for your advice.
SekeRob (2021-12-22 20:11:28+00:00): Ok, ill check it out Tomorrow. The issue is, there were 3 simple polygons. When merged you get duplicate segments on the former polygon-polygon borders. Not seen what the goned fixme said or the reason to merge, but someone reason ed it was fallow land, Something which is hardly anywhere used but Italy so I read in the wiki.
ataxit (2021-12-22 21:20:10+00:00): Great, now with vegetable shop! I can remeber that place when I was in holydays 2 years ago ;-). Thanks.
MxxCon (2021-12-22 05:37:43+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are building names you entered in this edit, such as "EDINJ 0899"?
Also it seems like there are a few places where you mapped parked cargo trailers/containers as building. That doesn't seem correct and should be fixed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115228637
eggie (2021-12-22 06:41:22+00:00): name= omgezet naar description.
Wanneer de parkeerplaats prive is zou je access=private kunnen toevoegen. Dan rendert de P minder prominent.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-12-22 08:19:07+00:00): Het is niet correct om nogmaals adresinfo toe te voegen aan de gebouw omtrek. Er zijn al adresnodes.
Ik heb het adres weer verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
sundew (2022-03-22 18:34:32+00:00): Hallo Garstedter,

kannst du bitte erläutern, was dein Changeset 115229260 soll? Das sieht mir sehr nach mechanischen Edits aus, d.h. ich habe den Verdacht, du hast dir die Objekte NICHT vor Ort angesehen. Du hast scheinbar mit einem Tool oder einer App einfach alle Objekte in einem großen Bereich umgepatcht / mit sinnlosen Tags vollgespammt. Und sowas ist ein undiskutierter, nicht erlaubter mechanischer Edit. 
Bitte belege, dass DU die Objekte vor Ort geprüft hast (z.B. GPS-Tracks, Objektfotos vom Änderungszeitpunkt, etc.). Außerdem wäre es dann hilfreich, wenn du dann das check_date entsprechend beachten und pflegen würdest.

Danke,
LG,
sundew
literan (2021-12-22 18:29:35+00:00): there is free access here by foot or bicycle. Your edit is wrong. Revert
MapPiper (2021-12-23 01:22:22+00:00): Hey literan,
Thanks for bringing this up. I was matching the tagging for the connected service road, but I see how that is inappropriate. This Mapillary image (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2671312593170702) does not show any barriers or restrictive signage. Would it be appropriate to extend Счастливая улица (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137375071) south to connect with this service highway? I see no evidence that it transitions to a track, or dirt path.
literan (2021-12-23 19:19:24+00:00): Yes, it's a good idea to extend Счастливая улица. Feel free to fix it
Sanniu (2022-01-19 07:11:36+00:00): Hi
The pedestrian area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014186473 is not accessible to anyone and disconnected from any other path? Is this by design?
Sokuya (2022-01-21 11:07:04+00:00): yes, there should be a crossing here but I didn't add sidewalks yet
MapPiper (2021-12-22 00:24:45+00:00): Source: Maxar Standard Imagery; OSM Data
Jordi MF (2021-12-23 11:09:22+00:00): Hola,
He visto que estás añadiendo información de cañadas. ¿Estás seguro que se puede andar por todas estas cañadas? Aunque históricamente existieron, si actualmente no existe la senda, puede ser peligroso mostrar así la información porque cualquier persona podría pensar que puede andar por esta senda. Si estás Por favor, indica de dónde estás obteniendo la información porque si la estás obteniendo de alguna fuente de la que no tenemos permiso, podría haber problemas legales para OSM.

Respecto a la cañadas, podríamos pensar alguna etiqueta que muestre mejor la realidad. Si la senda no tiene camino visible, una buena forma de mapear estas cañadas creo que podría ser:
highway=path (no footway) + trail_visibility=no.
Saludos
Saludos,
Jordi
Jordi MF (2021-12-23 11:15:04+00:00): Esta senda parece que no existe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014194184

Mirando las ortofotos, parece que va campo a través. ¿Seguro que ahí hay una senda?
Jordi MF (2021-12-23 11:44:47+00:00): Esta cueva que has etiqeutado como "Cueva del dragón" es la "Cova dels Diablets". Hay estudios sobre ella: http://repositori.uji.es/xmlui/handle/10234/104137
Traslado ese nombre, del que no indicas la fuente, a "alt_name".
mueschel (2021-12-26 15:12:03+00:00): Hi,
I don't think it's necessary to have so many tags for the charges here - it's common to combine them into one tag, e.g.

charge = 1 USD/motorcar; 2 USD/hgv; ...

Could you consider changing this?
Minh Nguyen (2021-12-26 19:21:30+00:00): Unfortunately, the access keys as units would be inconsistent with the differing prices per axle along other sections of the highway, which require conditional tagging. There would still need to be charge:txtag for the TxTag-specific prices too. It looks like there is precedent for keeping the prices in separate keys, so if possible, I would prefer to stick with that for prices based on the standard TxDOT signs for toll roads.

Access-as-unit was only very recently documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:Diff/2188260 and usage appears to be largely limited to Brazil and Malaysia, which may have very different needs around pricing than toll roads in the U.S.
Minh Nguyen (2021-12-26 19:26:16+00:00): By the way, I don’t mean a fixed price per axle; there are sections that have unrelated prices depending on the number of axles on the vehicle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3248852590 These signs are newer than the signs showing prices by vehicle type that I saw in Bing Streetside, so the latter may have been replaced by per-axle signs anyways.
mueschel (2021-12-26 19:59:21+00:00): (I don't say your choice of tags is wrong in any sense, I just think that we could keep it a bit more "compact" with fewer keys. "charge:txdot" seems necessary to have in your case as well as the charge:conditional for the axle counts)

It's not a recent addition to the Wiki - It was removed between May and August. It was there since 2017: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge&oldid=1460075

There are also many occurrences of things like "6 EUR/adult; 3 EUR/child".
E.g. there are 21 "charge:motorcar", but about 500 "charge = xy/motorcar".

But another point: Regarding "charge:txdot:vehicle" - the order "charge:vehicle:txdot" would actually be more in-line with other tags - the transportation mode is typically inserted after the main key, and before the sub-key.
Minh Nguyen (2021-12-26 20:54:35+00:00): Ah, I hadn’t noticed that earlier appearance. In any case, this syntax is disputed in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:charge#Proposed_advanced_usage so I’ll throw my 2¢ into the talk page.

You’re the expert on key order, so I’ll defer to you on that point. 😉 Fixed in changeset 115399765.
kguenther24 (2021-12-22 04:03:33+00:00): Great work on this area! One comment, I would consider adding the tag footway=sidewalk to ways tagged highway=footway if they run parallel to streets. Footways are usually tagged in areas where a path is not in a street's right of way. (ex. a park or school campus)
RunTrails (2021-12-31 14:19:04+00:00): Sorry but how do you add parking spaces with incomplete tags? I had to update all of them with capacity=1.
Rich1234 (2021-12-31 15:05:43+00:00): According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space the default value for "capacity" is 1:

Quoting from the URL: "If an area represents more than one parking space (of equal kind), use capacity=* to define the number of parking spaces it represents. The default value for capacity=* is "1" if not mapped otherwise."

As these are single parking spaces, for one vehicle each, the wiki is clear that "capacity=1" is not required.  Which is why I did not add "capacity=1" to the spaces.
RunTrails (2021-12-31 15:46:36+00:00): If the wiki says capacity is optional, then why is capacity given a default value in Parking Space? Makes no sense right :) Happy New Year.
Rich1234 (2021-12-31 15:53:51+00:00): In JOSM the parking space preset has no default set for "capacity".

But I see you used ID to edit the spaces.  That may be ID "doing its own thing".  If you follow the tagging email list you'll find many threads cropping up detailing complaints about ID "doing their own thing" with presets, even when the wiki defines a different way.

So it is drift between the wiki and what the ID developers decide to do with their presets.
ralley (2021-12-22 19:24:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Just a pointer that might make your life easier: in NZ the majority of buildings consist of mostly 90 degree corners.  You can easily make all corners 90 degrees in the Id editor by selecting the building, right clicking and choosing “Square”.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115232420
ovruni (2022-01-02 06:56:04+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se había agregado una reja en la entrada de la residencial José Joaquín Inclán, sin embargo las imágenes de Mapillary desde la panamericana no parecen mostrar esta barrera por el conjunto de casa en el medio. ¿Cual es enlace en Mapillary que muestra esta barrera?
Saludos
Nelson Qiu (2022-01-02 07:17:09+00:00): Hi Ovruni, thank you for the question. I'm confused, which barrier on which street are you referring to?
ovruni (2022-01-02 07:22:04+00:00): La barrera se había ubicado en la coordenada -12.167866 -76.9810561, como nodo 9357038305.
Nelson Qiu (2022-01-02 07:33:56+00:00): Hi Ovruni, I think I added the barrier on the wrong street. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Baloo Uriza (2023-11-24 16:34:16+00:00): These buildings don't match the shape on the ground at all... please use more care in the future.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115232843
MxxCon (2021-12-22 05:43:45+00:00): Is it active or decommissioned callbox? If decommissioned, perhaps it should be marked somehow so that it doesn't how up on emergency-related maps?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115233151
MapSpot (2021-12-22 05:51:58+00:00): Good question. I'm fairly confident this call box is still functioning given that its wire connection to the telephone pole seems to be intact and maintained. I live in this neighborhood, so I've walked by it fairly often. I obviously won't test the thing by pulling the alarm handle, but I'll reach out to the local fire department and see if they know something the residents here don't about the call boxes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115233151
iandees (2021-12-22 04:28:32+00:00): Hi! Crime scenes aren't permanent and thus don't belong in OSM. Please don't add them to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115233169
ChazzoMozza (2021-12-23 01:47:56+00:00): I've been trying to identify a mapping platform other than Google Maps for crime scene geospatial analysis, but have realised this isn't the right one. I was just playing around with the functions. However, I'd argue that the location a crime has take place, is most definitely permanent. At no point in the future will the crime have taken place in a different location. But feedback noted. Over and out.
Kovoschiz (2021-12-22 08:43:08+00:00): Please don't delete them as they represent a shop space with indoor position and potentially address.
aharvey (2022-03-09 23:15:03+00:00): hi I think it's better to use the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hazmat tag, so hazmat=no for this. Is there a reason for using access:conditional?
TheSwavu (2022-10-24 23:06:16+00:00): @aharvey ... just discovered this through a QA warning. I agree that hazmat with a conditional would be better.
aduxas (2025-09-01 17:39:44+00:00): Did you walk these trails?  I tried following the Western branch of the Betty Hallberg trail (under the power lines) going down from the intersection with the Dick Hallberg trail, and did not get very far.  The trail is very overgrown and completely vanishes where it crosses the power line.  I went around the other side and found no trace of it either.  However, there is a marked trail which is not on the WLCT map. I added it.  The WLCT seems very inaccurate btw.
ZestyEel (2025-09-01 17:56:15+00:00): Hello! Iirc I walked them and used Strava to get the ones I couldn't tackle for time. However this was over three years ago and I live in a different state now. If the trail maintenance has changed feel free to edit!
aduxas (2025-09-01 20:33:21+00:00): I will contact the Warren Land Conservation Trust and ask before making any changes.  Thanks!
aduxas (2025-09-01 20:35:43+00:00): Actually.  I just checked their website and that trail is no longer on the map, while the one I added this morning is.  https://warrenlct.org/protected-lands/properties-we-protect/haile-farm-preserve/
user_5359 (2021-12-25 19:27:58+00:00): Hello! Is there any reason to uyse the prefix social: instead of the prefix contact: ?
Nearby0051 (2021-12-25 20:09:49+00:00): Hi

This wasn't me. First version of this object was created by the user Dan0mic
But is say it's safe to assume that this was just a mistake that didn't get noticed in time
patelmm79 (2021-12-22 06:06:35+00:00): no need for review
wireguy (2021-12-22 14:26:38+00:00): hi simonah, can you check your fix?  I think you dragged a node and doubled over a boundary forming a self-intersection.
simonah_telenav (2021-12-22 14:49:19+00:00): Hi, indeed it is, I checked again and I corrected it.
Thank you!
tastrax (2021-12-30 11:21:52+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Dimacn (2021-12-23 06:34:16+00:00): Зачем вы удалили здание детского сада? Ваш вандализм отменён.
Dimacn (2021-12-23 06:51:55+00:00): И ещё, вся территория детского сада здесь уже отмечена. Редактируйте свойства территории детского сада, а не добавляйте дублирующий детский сад в виде точки.
AppleME (2021-12-28 08:59:03+00:00): the osm website joins the two links in the source tag, so here they are split:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1239162016520994
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4318108674868068
mavl (2021-12-23 12:23:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. В OpenStreetMap указывают полные названия улиц: не "Школьная", а "Школьная улица".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Czev92 (2021-12-22 12:35:41+00:00): Jeżeli chodzi o Czeladzki park, z takim nazewnictwem najczęściej spotkałem się z strony mieszkańców i władz miejskich. Też nie zbyt mi się podoba, ale ze względu na bliskość Parku Alfred, jakieś rozróżnienie na mapie uważam za słuszne. Raz  tylko spotkałem się z nazwą "Park Saturn" w projekcie BO z 2019 . Niestety ciężko o jakieś oficjalne informacje ;//.
olo81 (2022-03-27 20:02:18+00:00): "Park przy ul. 21 Listopada" oznacza że park nie ma nazwy urzędowej i jest to lokalizacja.
C2oc4 (2022-04-09 09:47:01+00:00): Dzień dobry. Czyli park przy ul. Rewolucjonistów jest poprawną nazwą?
olo81 (2022-04-09 09:51:21+00:00): To ja się pytam, skąd wzięta jest ta nazwa? Dlaczego to już 3 albo 4 nazwa tego parku dodana przez ciebie? 
Skąd bierzesz fe nazwy? 
Źródło poproszę.
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 06:57:48+00:00): Źródło masz w nazwie parku ale specjalnie dla wrzucę Ci link tutaj: https://bedzin.bip.info.pl/plik.php?id=385019&wer=1
olo81 (2022-06-28 23:04:52+00:00): To skąd była nazwa "park przy ul. Rewolucjonistów" i inne wcześniejsze?
gscholz (2021-12-23 05:38:54+00:00): Hi IllerRiver,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding a not connected way (thick red dot):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-75.39197&lat=6.12231&zoom=13&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115239916

As the "56 AN 02" is now an interupted oneway it is not possible to travel from east to west.

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
IllerRiver (2022-01-10 23:43:33+00:00): Hi gscholz, Thank you for catching this and letting me know. My team member and I have now revisited this area and updated the roads to correctly route for the recently added divided highway, which can be seen in Mapillary.
abakus_uploader (2021-12-22 23:30:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
HSL_HRT (2021-12-22 08:09:30+00:00): Kaskinauriintien alkuosa ollut aiemmin katua Naurismäki. Naurismäki jää voimaan pohj.osassa.
(Muutos vaikuttaa korttelien 46031 ja 46033 toissijaisiin II-osoitteisiin.)
eggie (2021-12-22 09:22:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   name=TransIP  zal niets doen in OSM
Ook de aard van het bedrijf toevoegen svp.
Meestal office=company
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-22 09:31:01+00:00): office=it en website toegevoegd
Heerema naar adresnode verplaatst. 
gr eggie
Jordi MF (2021-12-23 07:58:52+00:00): Hola Lylia200,
Gràcies per millorar les dades d'OSM. He estat revisant algunes modificacions que has fet en les places i hi ha errors. A més de l'etiqueta place=square, si la plça és peatonal i la gent hi pot caminar, cal afegir les etiquetes area=yes + highway=pedestrian. Tu les has eliminades. Ho corregiré.
Salutacions,
Jordi
Jordi MF (2021-12-23 08:08:02+00:00): Hotra cosa que ha mapeado erróneamente y se podría considerar vandalismos es el cambio de idioma. Oficialmente, la plaça se denomina en valenciano, por lo que en la etiqueta "name", debe estar únicamente como "Plaça del 9 d'Octubre". Si quieres añadir traducciones al castellano, utiliza name:es=*.
Saludos
Larmax (2021-12-22 09:00:25+00:00): Added footways in Matinkylä
Frans S (2022-01-03 11:15:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115242975
user_5359 (2023-06-06 15:30:13+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.osm.org/way/531202554/history. What is the mean of the tag road=Begnas-Vorletaar?
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 10:08:21+00:00): Sitzt im Gewerkschaftshaus noch mehr als nur die IGM?
Denn eigentlich ist dann dass office=ngo am Gebäude falsch. die NGO ist ja mit der IGM schon  von dir verzeichnet worden
SafetyIng (2021-12-26 10:09:12+00:00): Achso, für Gewerkschaften gäbe es auch office=union
StefanHRT (2021-12-22 10:26:47+00:00): Bitte noch einmal kontrollieren, sehe z.B. footwa statt footway. Gibt fehlermeldungen ;)
Supaplex030 (2021-12-22 15:41:50+00:00): Habs schon gefixt! Passiert...
Lg
Frans S (2022-01-05 08:53:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115244843
user_5239402 (2021-12-22 09:40:33+00:00): https://rail.blue/railroad/logis/CTC.aspx?line=Seoul_Line_4_Gwacheon_Seoul
DripHydration (2021-12-22 09:47:32+00:00): https://driphydration.com/coverage-areas/miami/
user_5359 (2021-12-25 17:39:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Not the entire service area is a hospital. Please enter only actually existing objects