piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
4rch (2015-04-28 08:13:44+00:00): @mitzip: we have the same boundaries as Google/Bing/HERE Map: http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/#13/45.7653/18.8930&num=4&mt0=mapnik&mt1=google-map&mt2=bing-map&mt3=nokia-map
mitzip (2015-04-28 13:47:44+00:00): @4rch, shouldn't we be concerned with accuracy instead of what google has done?

For instance, I'd like to think that Serbian and Croatian govt. GIS data would take precedence over the laziness or incompetence of Google, Bing, et tal.

http://geoportal.nipp.hr/hr/application/view

It's undisputed, by the only two countries that matter, from the two national GIS links I've provided that the borders of Croatia and Serbia should not include within them the parcel being called Liberland by some folks, whether it's labeled Liberland or not. If you notice, there are a number of other parcels of land along this stretch of the Danube that also should not be included within the border of either country as per their own official maps.

This is an opportunity for OSM to do what it's supposed to, be the most accurate map in the world. If someone makes OSM more accurate here along the Danube are you going to remove it again?
4rch (2015-04-29 07:54:45+00:00): @mitzip, my motivation is to make boundaries in OSM worldwide as accurate as possible. You’re right, Google etc. can’t be taken as reference as they’ve also poor boundaries in some cases.

The current boundary along the Danube doesn’t reflect OSM policies [1]. It represents the Croatian viewpoint (along the old river course) and not the de facto boundary.

The combination of parts of the Croatian claim with parts of the Serbian claim (as shown by their GIS agencies) makes no sense as those claims are incompatible with each other. The claims only make sense when you look at them separately. 

Nevertheless, the different claims (as shown by the national GIS agencies) are irrelevant for OSM. OSM is only interested in the line of control as boundary. [2] This line lies in the middle of the main navigable channel. [3][4] I’ve visualized the line of control. [5]

[1] compare with http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf
[2] http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf
[3] Page 25, https://www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/publications/view/?id=218
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatia%E2%80%93Serbia_border_dispute#Territorial_claims
[5] http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/line-of-control-serbia-croatia_38142
mitzip (2015-04-29 21:01:14+00:00): I appreciate you taking the time to look into this further. Are you proposing, for OSM purposes, to set the boundary along the current main navigable channel of the Danube? As in your visualization?
4rch (2015-04-29 23:30:15+00:00): Yes, I'd propose to set the boundary along the middle of the main navigable channel of the Danube as I've visualized: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/line-of-control-serbia-croatia_38142
mitzip (2015-04-30 03:08:36+00:00): The "line of control" language cited by wikipedia, if true to reality on the ground (and it seems so), would represent what travelers would actually likely encounter. That would indeed be me most accurate, and I think a sane move for OSM. 

Out of curiosity, what events would be required to take place for Liberland to be recognized by OSM? If Croatia and Serbia recognize Liberland, that would make Liberland's declared borders define a "line of control" and therefore reality on the ground for travelers. Would that be enough?
4rch (2015-04-30 08:58:55+00:00): On the fly I'd say that the following requirements should be fullfilled before Liberland can be added into the OSM database:

- has control of the territory

- has citizens

- has state authority (government, head of state, parliament, police, court etc.)

- the territory must include land mass

- is recognized by a reasonable number of other states

This would be of course a matter of discussion with the OSM community.
Golovco Anatolie (2015-04-30 09:06:59+00:00): (done) - has control of the territory
(done) - has citizens
(done, has President) - has state authority (government, head of state, parliament, police, court etc.)
(what you mean?) - the territory must include land mass
(in progress) - is recognized by a reasonable number of other states (How many states recognized Transnistria? why they still vandalize Moldavian Map? http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=8/47.369/29.498)

"This would be of course a matter of discussion with the OSM community."

sounds like we are not part of comunity
mitzip (2015-04-30 15:01:56+00:00): Both of you bring up good points. I don't think OSM is properly prepared, policy-wise, to deal with the new wave of countries that will be coming into existence in the future. They won't be the traditional type. Even with the traditional type there is currently no central authority that approves new nations or even consensus on what constitutes a new country outside of OSM. While Liberland does have a government, it will have no concept of a state run police force and future countries may not even have a government like we're used to seeing and instead be based on contract. This situation will be akin to the introduction of the internet for the MPAA, the automobile for the horse, bitcoin for banking, etc. The "old guard" does not understand it. https://twitter.com/haydentiff/status/593488159335391234 OSM has the opportunity to lead the world in this respect and I think is a great topic for the community. Is there a location (forum or something) where this discussion can start?
4rch (2015-04-30 15:14:32+00:00): (done) - has control of the territory --> No. Just because someone went to a place and placed a flag there does not mean that he controls this territory. Liberland currently has no control over the territory. The flag was removed and the Croation police prevents that unauthorized persons can enter the territory. [1]

(what you mean?) - the territory must include land mass --> for example Sealand has no land territory, it is only an installation at sea within the British territory (not relevant for Liberland).

(in progress) - is recognized by a reasonable number of other states (How many states recognized Transnistria? why they still vandalize Moldavian Map? --> Transnistria isn't mapped as an independent state (it isn’t tagged with admin_level=2 and it is included in the Moldovian territory).

"This would be of course a matter of discussion with the OSM community."

sounds like we are not part of community
--> Sorry, I don’t want to say that you aren’t part of the community. Please forget this sentence. The sentence was formulated incomprehensible.

[1] https://liberland.org/en/forum/?threadID=1990459895531850e4e7da
Rene Malmgren (2016-05-29 20:52:09+00:00): Well I would have to say that if you follow the guidelines, Liberland should not be mapped. That said and done, a small track around the map you will very quickly discover that this is followed very very badly around the zones of conflict. Just to give you a few hints.

1. Kosovo is an independent state, has control over its land, nope. 

2. Crimea is an independent state? Really, they joined the Russian federation long time ago. Anybody having doubts about territorial control here?

3. Lugansk, and Donetsk are part of Ukraine, really?

4. How about Abschasia and South Ossetia? They are currently part of Georgia. 

And thats just walking around the recent conflicts. I am not even talking about the fact that we are currently not mapping the Islamic State, and the other mess in the Middle East.

Anyhow, I would suggest that you map Croatia in a correct way, as per current zone of control. The territory referred to as Liberland / Saga is under no circumstance Croatia.
mrunner (2016-05-30 00:15:51+00:00): Well I think to be fair to all OSM should have option to add disputed areas and show claims of different countries. This would be also useful for travelers so they know they could get in trouble just by moveing in certain area that is disputed.
user_5359 (2015-04-16 16:20:46+00:00): Bitte keine ungesicherten Planungsstände als real existierende Straße eintragen.
smootheFiets (2020-01-11 03:06:41+00:00): Bonjour Yves-louis,

L'Écosite que tu as ajouté est entouré par une area=yes, highway=service (voirie 338813723). Elle n'est liée à aucune autre voirie, donc Osmose signale l'erreur "Petit ensemble de voiries séparées du réseau principal ou avec des accès insuffisants" : http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/error/1af43ec1-58d0-15ab-8fa3-3b4668fe5e0f

Saurais-tu réparer cela ? Je soupçonne que ce n'est pas vraiment une "highway" mais plutôt une espèce de clôture. Peut-être barrier=* ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:barrier

Bien cordialement,
MMMigo
luiswoo (2015-04-16 17:22:25+00:00): есть заметки к карте, не нужно лепить многочисленные сортиры.
-off- (2015-04-16 17:29:16+00:00): Действительно. Работает.
skyper (2015-04-16 19:52:42+00:00): Hey panoramedia

Habe gerade den Punkt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1266017020/history) wieder zurückgesetzt.

Mit iD kann es leicht mal passieren, dass Punkte unabsichtlich verschoben werden.

Grüße skyper
Vincent de Phily (2015-04-16 16:35:35+00:00): Reverted. Please grow up, and contribute something usefull.
mf47 (2015-04-21 13:08:38+00:00): Warum wurde dieser Eintrag gelöscht?
Rockus (2015-04-21 17:55:16+00:00): Ich habe die Bezeichnung der Straße aus mehreren Gründen wieder entfernt.

Diese Änderung war Teil einer umfangreichen Änderung/Import auch anderer Wegenamen im Raum Zwickau, in den meisten / allen Fällen ohne Überprüfung der Lage vor Ort.

Dieser Name ist vor Ort nicht bestimmbar (kein einziges Straßenschild) und die statt dessen bei allen Änderungen verwendete Quelle (interne Straßenliste
 bzw. internes GIS der Stadt Zwickau nach eigener Aussage) ist so im Moment nicht lizenzkompatibel zu OSM, weder offen zugänglich noch nachprüfbar als gemeinfrei erklärt worden.

Die Quelle als solche muss es aber sein, da sonst nicht-lizenzkompatible Daten
in OSM einfließen, das gilt auch für Namen.

Ich verweise nochmals auf die kurze Zusammenfassung unter http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Legal_FAQ#Beitragen bzw. die Contributor Terms http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms/DE

Selbst wenn eine amtliche Quelle benutzt werden darf, so ist es weiterhin
angebracht, Daten daraus nicht unkontrolliert einzutragen.

Amtliche Daten sind nicht per Definition richtige Daten und enthalten gerade bei nicht gewidmeten (bzw. auch verschieden überlieferten) Namen (von Feld- und Waldwegen z.B.) eine nicht nachvollziehbare Darstellung.
5n8ke (2015-04-16 17:40:38+00:00): Forgot Comment:
Shop closed for nearly 8 months now. Not opening again.
DaxServer (2017-02-21 07:22:48+00:00): Hi, "Bīdar" seems Latvian (Google Translate says so). If you'd like, I can update it.
yogi_ks (2017-05-10 07:18:49+00:00): Thank you for noticing. It is transliterated Kannada language name of this place in the ISO 15919 format - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:kn:iso15919
I have updated this node accordingly.
DaxServer (2017-05-10 16:29:25+00:00): Thanks ;)
flohoff (2015-04-17 09:39:50+00:00): Das war keine Doublette sondern ein highway=proposed - Also der geplante 2 Spurige ausbau oder?

Ich habe jetzt selber keinen Stress damit das rauszuwerfen aber das war keine doublette.

Flo
*Martin* (2015-04-17 06:20:21+00:00): Ahoj  ozDino.

Na forach sme uz  viackrat diskutovali, ze do tagu name nepatri vseobecne pomenovanie, ako napr. Materska skola, Obecna kniznica, _kostol_ svateho Patra, _Obecny urad_ Kalsa a podobne. Vseobecny nazov je implikovany hlavnymi tagmi, v tomto pripade amenity=kindergarden, amenity=library, amenity=place_of_worship + building=church, amenity=townhall. Preto si myslim, ze by si tieto vseobecne nazvy mal z nazvy vynechat. Ak mas iny nazor, prosim napis do fora osm_sk, kde by sme ho mohli spolocne prediskutovat. Dakujem.
AndersAndersson (2015-04-21 04:14:02+00:00): Bra att du ritar hus, men tänk på att slå på GPS-spår och minimera förskjutningen av flygbilderna innan du börjar flytta vägar.
T.ex. hade Hyttgatsrondellen och gatorna runt OKQ8 blivit väldigt förskjutna.
krza (2015-04-16 20:32:23+00:00): Stimmt, hatte ich wohl verdreht, danke!
ij_ (2015-04-20 18:02:45+00:00): Why did you remove välkky and provided absolutely no replacement for it (nor did you tell honestly what you did in your changeset comment)? Please revert or find a better tag, if you don't know what it is, please simply revert without asking me to spend extra time on explaining what it is (I'm beginning to get very tired of constantly complaining to about these "fixes" that randomly remove tags without any sensible process to prevent data loss). Also, don't leave it as is and force me to poll and revert (as if I would remember), which is what I've had to do with the previous removers changes, unfortunately.
I suppose this edit was is due to taginfo cleanup process which should definately fall under Mechanical Edits Policy and its review clauses but each and every mapper removing data so far have claimed that it magically doesn't. I don't believe you or them did randomly end up seeing this particular node in your editor but rather you used computer assisted search to get the nodes you edit (the search runs on Taginfo computer or on overpass) that should definately make them subject to MEP.

Thank you.
Claudius Henrichs (2015-04-27 11:32:00+00:00): Hi, Thanks for your comment. To start with the last part of your comment: These are not mechanical edits, instead I review individual entries in Taginfo and correct those that appear to me a mistagged or remove others that look like tagging mistakes or redundant information.

The "Välkky=yes" tagging was added 5 years ago by user "alv" in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6342582
The changeset comment didn't really indicate what should be documented by this and it's the only ever use of that tag which leads to believe it was a mistake in tagging. Looking back I should've probably reached out to alv since he is still active, but I wonder if he still remember what he was tagging in November 2011. I've sent him a message to have a look.
alv (2015-04-27 12:48:47+00:00): Especially now that they're still in a testing and monitoring phase, i.e. the city tries to measure whether they affect the drivers' behaviour in any manner, or if some devices are better than the others, storage of the information is necessarily unorthodox. 

If I were to start tagging some obscure details which only occur, say, once in each municipality, it would take a long time to add more than one of them; but it'd be pointless to remove it while waiting for others to tag them in other cities.
alv (2015-04-27 13:23:47+00:00): Oh, one more thing. Especially seldom used words in the tags can get the osm feature browse pages a nice first page visibility in general search engines' results, which can be surprisingly helpful in the future.
Claudius Henrichs (2015-04-27 14:51:18+00:00): Thanks both for clarifying. I've re-added the tagging (even though in lower case fashion). I think we should consider embedding it into the crossing=* theme though, e.g. either as crossing=uncontrolled_välkky or crossing=välkky 
Adding a new tag describing the type of pedestrian crossing seems a little overkill.
It would also help tremendously if you would add at least a stub documentation to the OSM wiki so your fellow mappers like me better understand what you are trying to capture.
ij_ (2015-04-27 17:02:50+00:00): Sure, the current way of tagging it is definately not the most optimal. I'd say it's more of a "reminder" type of a tag that can/should be changed to a proper tag once one discovers what that would be. I bet there are others similar ones in Finland for features that either didn't have a tag when inputted to OSM or for some reason the tag was not found from the wiki even if it existed (for non-natives it's often a challenge to figure out the magic words to locate something from the wiki).

Of course it would be even better to have some proper English key for this kind of devices (I'm assuming they might have similar ones in other countries?). There seems to flashing_lights=yes/no in wiki BTW which would be at least close, however, does it mean traffic lights type of flashing or is it more generic, it doesn't seem to have that much documentation either... ;-) However, I don't know if "välkky" itself generalizes as there seem to be many types of them and alv seems to be interested in keeping the different types too for now (it would be better in value than in a key though, at minimum).

While I understand why having wiki page on every tag would be useful for others (mainly for non-locals though), it's also rather heavy-weight for those who tend to map a lot and for example in case like this it also feels the benefits are not that high due to sparsity of the välkky devices to begin with and since it's unlikely to be the final key for these kind of devices for obvious reasons it would also likely duplicate some effort. Certainly if we know the canonical tag for something we use it and slowly convert the previously used ones to that format but mapping on large are obviously means that it would take lots of time to notice everything :-).
Skippern (2015-04-16 19:15:51+00:00): Vou reverter este changeset como fui errado apagar este estrada em planejamento
ampcosta22 (2015-04-16 19:31:31+00:00): Foi você quem mapeou aqui?
Skippern (2015-04-16 19:41:04+00:00): 95% do rede BR fui editado por mim, 100% dos planejados, o rede BR e monitorado por fbello do Porto Alegre. 75% do Espírito Santo e editado por mim, e monitorado por mim. E muito provável que edições dentro espirito santo ou do rede BR e editado por mim.
ampcosta22 (2015-04-16 19:46:14+00:00): Eu posso fazer as alterações que estou fazendo? Só altero onde conheço e já passei. Nesse trajeto no qual editei, estou verificando pois farei uma viagem neste trecho e pretendo gravar os pontos em .gpx para depois corrigir o traçado.
Skippern (2015-04-16 19:52:40+00:00): Pode sim, mas manter estradas parte da rede BR ou ES como tertiary ou mais alto, e não quebrar as relações.
ampcosta22 (2015-04-16 19:56:58+00:00): Mesmo as rurais de leito natural nas quais se trafega no meio da pista, como foi o caso destas que alterei?
Skippern (2015-04-16 20:04:24+00:00): Se eu nao perdeu eequilibrio no ultimo discussão sobre classificação das rodovias, se fazer parte do rede rodovias federal ou estadual e pelo menus tertiary, mesmo se leito natural
ampcosta22 (2015-04-16 20:07:23+00:00): Ok. Vou desfazer a alteração.
alv (2015-04-21 12:12:53+00:00): This change added the tag "building:material" to a footway? Seems peculiar.
Claudius Henrichs (2017-12-31 12:57:39+00:00): This was converting a previous tag "Bauausführung=Holz"
Hjart (2015-04-17 07:33:48+00:00): Hej
Jeg har tilladt mig at lave nogle rettelser til det du har lavet her.

Velkommen til vores projekt iøvrigt og god fornøjelse med det.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-17 11:15:37+00:00): Proszę informację o źródle tych budynków.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-17 17:18:44+00:00): Tak jeszcze na marginesie - milczenie nie rozwiąże problemu - jeśli nie zostanie podane źródło tych budynków to prawdopodobnie zostaną one usunięte.
maraf24 (2015-04-17 08:48:26+00:00): 1. Proszę wypełniac komentarz przy zapisie edycji
2. nazwy miejscowości piszemy wielką literą.
3. w adresie 10x nie stawiamy spacji między 10 a x
4. budynek jest krzywy - nie ma kątów prostych

I najważniejsze - czy ten i sąsiednie budynki istnieją czy to są jakieś plany?
will_p (2015-04-17 08:16:58+00:00): You are systematically changing all the leisure=gym to leisure=fitness_centre. I have noticed you doing this gradually over more than two weeks. It is courteous to include changeset comments when changing tags, so it is immediately clear to others what you are doing. Also, I think this change should have been discussed first. To me this is a mass edit, the fact you have done it in small parts, by stealth, doesn't change that.
maxerickson (2015-06-11 18:33:51+00:00): Are you using an imagery offset? Comparing against the OSM GPS Trace layer from Mapbox and the Strava Cycling Heatmap, the imagery in the Grand Rapids area appears to be quite well aligned, and in many cases you have offset the center lines of roads about 20 feet from Bing and those GPS layers.
samely (2015-06-15 13:31:39+00:00): Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I work with Bing Aerial Imagery and I made a mistake moving all nodes in the box, so I've already reverted the changeset. I'll be careful of this from now.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31933699
Skippern (2015-04-17 00:54:50+00:00): Eu vejo que voce mudou trecho do ES-379 no Iúna, o trecho voce marcou nao bate com DER-ES, tem placas no local do este trecho? Se sim, o relacao do ES-379 deve ser atualizado com o novo trecho, se nao o tag ref deve ser tirado desse trecho
ampcosta22 (2015-04-17 02:18:19+00:00): Estou com dificuldade para entender como editar corretamente os mapas. Normalmente eu observo como as vias estão registradas em cidades maiores e por analogia eu edito da mesma forma. Para este trecho, por exemplo, me lembrei de como está editada a Avenida Brasil em Juiz de Fora - MG. A mesma é uma avenida que corta a cidade mas está também catalogada como BR-???.
Me passa o link, se possível, do fórum de discussões o qual você falou mais cedo.
Sowa1980 (2018-08-09 03:23:21+00:00): Привет, посмотри это актуально и нужно, если нет то может удалить , чего карту захламлять этим, покрытие bingа сейчас почти везде.
Otnow (2018-08-09 04:55:17+00:00): Привет. Согласен, думаю можно удалить.
aseerel4c26 (2015-04-16 21:53:19+00:00): siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
An Open Street Map User (2015-04-16 22:54:35+00:00): Setting speed limit in area
literan (2015-04-25 10:01:54+00:00): это - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125526952/history - не пешеходная улица на мосту, что вы выдумываете. Обычный пеш. переход (т.е. пешеходная дорожка, поднятая над уровнем проезжей части). Откатываю вашу правку в этой части.
naoliv (2015-04-16 22:35:42+00:00): JAMJAM1974, a floresta não tem alguma nome específico?
Esse nome que você colocou deveria ser uma descrição, e não nome.
ViriatoLusitano (2015-05-12 23:50:16+00:00): A o canal "Canal Loureiro - Alvito" está correctamente mapeada? Parece que é uma linha recta de 10 km sobre terreno.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159066379
topolusitania (2015-05-13 11:25:40+00:00): Olá
O canal Loureiro - Alvito é uma espécie de "pipeline" subterrâneo, tendo sido classificado como "Canal" em "túnel". Por isso o tracejado. Optámos por "canal" e "tunel" para que se pudesse evidenciar nos mapas, como parte do complexo de rega do Alqueva.
Peter Dobratz (2015-04-19 04:56:18+00:00): Thanks for adding this pub to the map.  I updated some of the tags on this to be in a standard format.
pep_ (2015-04-17 02:24:20+00:00): Aligned paths to the map
ij_ (2015-04-20 17:51:49+00:00): Olisi varmaan parempi tehdä tuo Mustikkamaan liikuntapuisto leisure=sport_centre:nä koko tuolle alueelle kattaen kaikki kentät ja huoltorakennuksenkin ja jättää se pois tuolta itse kentältä.
lemms (2015-04-17 04:49:50+00:00): Missing building, 80 Golden Castle, between 82 and 78.
lemms (2015-04-17 04:47:13+00:00): something is wrong. There isn't so many buildings squeezed in the section.
leditschke (2015-04-19 21:32:55+00:00): Round Guys Brewery, Lansdale, PA
SHARCRASH (2015-07-08 10:57:57+00:00): Voici une autre zone avec une multitude d'erreurs (explication dans mon commentaire précédent):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=6.07707&lat=48.69710&zoom=12&overlays=ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags
Chenti (2015-04-17 06:45:18+00:00): La denominación oficial es Delegación Territorial de la Junta de Castilla y León en Salamanca.
Se conoce con el nombre de ESAUM (Edificio de Servicios Administrativos de Usos Múltiples)
joyvious324 (2015-04-21 17:10:49+00:00): Your business POI is good, but the other streets are distorted and Apitong Street is too far from GPS trace and Bing satellite image of your edit. Please fix your edit or else I consider to partially revert of your edited street.