piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
WoodWoseWulf (2022-11-02 19:45:10+00:00): Hi raegan_rosi_wju,

You would have gotten quite a few warnings before you uploaded this changeset. This is because you duplicated a section of South Liberty Street.

The park you added was also already on the map.

I have reverted the changes you made here. If you are trying to do something in particular, please feel free to reach out.
eggie (2022-11-02 16:12:00+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk... 
Tip.. Niet dubbel taggen. Dus alleen op de adresnode..
De dubbeling heb ik van de gebouwomtrek verwijderd
Griet
eggie
eggie (2022-11-02 16:12:13+00:00): typo Groet  :)
eggie (2022-11-02 16:14:00+00:00): Alles overlapt hier Ik heb de onderste laag verwijderd
adiatmad (2022-11-03 08:42:36+00:00): Good work on your edits! But it will be better to avoid adding a generic name i.e name=Motorway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1109661437). Maybe you want to check this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
zyxzyx (2022-11-03 12:08:27+00:00): Hello,
Please do not add the duplicate ways which you added with an inappropriate tag, "name=Motorway", thank you.
zyxzyx (2022-11-04 15:35:02+00:00): We can't delete these duplicate ways. Help wanted.
adiatmad (2022-11-04 23:47:58+00:00): @zyxzyx You already deleted it. Please check my previous link above. Or do you find for another way?
andreashornig (2022-11-10 06:04:33+00:00): The ruin area is not yet shown on the tiles. Does it take longer to generate ruins?
RVR015 (2022-11-11 22:26:11+00:00): Hello dededaj158, 

Thank you for your edit. I am unable to find Suphai Island. What source was used for this edit? Looking forward to hearing from you.
LudovicG (2025-09-30 07:02:54+00:00): Bonjour,
La ref de la post_box node/7365364383 de Sombacour est bizarre (A6A4Z5 attendu). Auriez-vous l'occasion d'aller voir sur place  pour vérifier ?
LudovicG (2025-09-30 07:09:39+00:00): Je me réponds car sur une autre post_box problématique, la ref indiquée était le code commune/insee mais ici ("25549") ça ne fonctionne pas (25060) quoique le code postal s'en approche : 25520.
adas (2022-11-07 10:11:34+00:00): To wszystko jest wyburzone. Tu będzie osiedle.
jslawin (2022-11-07 12:05:49+00:00): OK .
maraf24 (2022-11-18 09:21:45+00:00): @jslawin: Dlaczego nie usunąłeś tych błędnie zaimportowanych budynków? 11 dni minęło.
jslawin2 (2022-11-18 16:18:17+00:00): Usunięte
yawfle (2022-11-02 20:34:07+00:00): Hi! This alley which you tagged as a residential street is absulutely an alley, and in fact is unusually narrow even by local alley standards (hence being signed as one-way). Please revert your change, thank you.
traveleditor (2022-11-02 22:40:44+00:00): Thanks for the information, I have reverted my changes
muralito (2022-11-02 18:16:00+00:00): Hola. Agrega tu comercio o lo que tengas interes, pero no borres cosas que existen, como por ejemplo borraste varios numeros de puerta de ese nodo. Esas direcciones existen.
D'Pelos Petshopuy (2022-11-12 19:46:07+00:00): sorry
SJFriedl (2022-11-02 17:35:19+00:00): This was actually mostly Santa Ana / Fountain Valley, not Huntington Beach.
mcliquid (2022-11-02 18:07:57+00:00): Hi, schön das du mitmachst!
Wenn das ein Fuß-und Radweg ist, dann sollte der Weg über die Brücke kein highway=footway sondern auch ein highway=path werden. Sonst kommt da kein Radfahrer mit dem Navi drüber.

Und der Weg hört unten beim landuse auf und nicht beim track!

Viele Grüße
bora can (2022-11-13 13:49:04+00:00): OSM eskiz alanı değildir, bu yüzden eklediğiniz nesneyi sildim.
felipeeugenio (2022-11-02 22:37:13+00:00): Hola. Gracias por la información.
Por favor no agregar numeraciones en los nombres de las calles. Es claramente incorrecto.
Si pudiera ubicar los números de las parcelas en un nodo yo puedo ayudarla con el resto de los tags.
Saludos
JhowieNitnek (2022-11-08 14:33:20+00:00): Why did you remove the amenity=community_centre tag?
bxl-forever (2022-11-11 10:39:09+00:00): Hello,

Exactly for the reason I explained in the changeset title.  Primary keys such as amenity:* and leisure:* may not be used together.  (In the same way that if a hospital is also a shop, we must  choose and have either one, or create two POI.)

To solve this, I felt the "leisure=sports_centre" part would describe it more accurately.  I don’t have any strong opinion about doing that or the opposite choice (tagging is as a community_centre and dropping the leisure tag).

What would you suggest?
pyrog (2022-11-03 16:42:02+00:00): Salut Laurent,

Cette modification à cassé la relation node network ;)

https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/route/13938959
GEO ECLA (2022-11-04 07:58:24+00:00): Bien vu. Il va falloir que je sois plus vigilant.
map4e123 (2024-09-02 13:19:20+00:00): Hallo wvdp, op meerdere stations zijn de kaartautomaten getagd als een shop=kiosk maar ook als brand=Kiosk. Kiosk is natuurlijk onderdeel van NS als horeca, maar die kaartautomaten hebben toch niets te maken met die tags? Wat is hier de reden van? Groet map4e
jeslop (2022-11-02 17:11:01+00:00): Hola guiigdks. 
Reciuerda utilizar adecuadamente los comentarios en los conjuntos de cambios:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments

Y no utilizar mayúsculas en los nombres: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may%C3%BAsculas

Soluciona los nombres cuando sea posible.

Saludos

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
gscholz (2022-11-04 08:14:55+00:00): Hi Jaume,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=1.88336&lat=41.54068&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128402437

This kind of errors irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Herman Lee (2022-11-03 14:25:58+00:00): 您好，鉴于中南大学历届学生的map黑记录，如错误的标签使用、名称奇怪的POI和形状奇怪的多边形，多位编辑者已经不胜其烦，如果方便的话，可以加群讨论一下：t.me/osmchina或者QQ：290278518，谢谢
Herman Lee (2022-11-03 14:54:00+00:00): 该修改集已退回
gscholz (2022-11-03 07:54:32+00:00): Hi alisari55,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue marker):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=35.73962&lat=41.50721&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128402820

This kind of error irritates routing software and look ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gpstracks (2022-11-02 17:51:14+00:00): Buongiorno.
Chiedo gentilmente come mai è stato cancellato il nome dal sentiero
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700953225
Grazie
rikmede (2022-11-02 20:30:50+00:00): Buona sera.
 Il campo name dovrebbe servire per dare un nome ad un elemento. "Muletiera", oltre ad essere sbagliato, non è un nome. Eventualmente si potrebbe aggiungere il campo description con il valore "mulattiera".
gpstracks (2022-11-03 17:15:45+00:00): Buonasera.
Mi risulta che in questo caso "Muletiera", sia proprio il nome specifico della mulattiera di guerra in quesione ed è quindi corretto nella grafia suddetta, come si può facilmente verificare in varie fonti (una a caso: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monteaperta)
rikmede (2022-11-04 17:53:16+00:00): Le varie fonti mi sembrano un copia incolla della stessa frase, che non riporta alcuna fonte. Tra l'altro viene sempre scritto in minuscolo. Si potrebbe chiedere alla sezione ANA di Taipana se ne sanno qualcosa, provo a sentire una persona che forse potrebbe chiedere. Comunque se al momento bastano le informazioni che si trovano su internet, allora il nome va ripristinato.
muralito (2022-11-02 18:11:31+00:00): Hi. ¿Why did you delete oneway=no tag?
ivanbranco (2022-11-02 21:39:01+00:00): Hi paunofu, this changeset deleted 8 tags, was it intended? Could you check it?
paunofu (2022-11-03 15:56:26+00:00): It was not intended, it's an issue of SC. Don't worry, I will restore the tags. Thank you for letting me know.

Regards, Pau.
solenoid jam (2022-11-02 18:28:59+00:00): Никарагуа
gscholz (2022-11-12 07:56:10+00:00): This changeset has created self intersecting lines. I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
SekeRob (2022-11-03 19:01:35+00:00): The consequence of this action is that addresses that had the full street name are now being flagged in QA with "No street with name "Via Camillo Benso conte di Cavour" found around". That's quite a few.
Also, now short_name and name are the same and the long name was not moved to full_name.

As someone wrote in an argument "mapping should be fun".
damianeue (2022-11-04 10:42:46+00:00): This is an old issue.
Since Cavour is also the name of a town in Piedmont, I originally tagged it with the full name of the person it is named after.
But I've seen, on official documents from San Giovanni Teatino, that it is simply named "Via Cavour", so I decided to do this edit.
I know that there are addresses and sidewalks with the person's name tagged, but I didn't have the time to edit those too. I was going to do it later today. Also, about short_name and full_name, I forgot that. I admit it.
If the DBSN that will be released by IGMI (for Abruzzo is still unavailable) under ODbL v1 shows that this street is, in fact, named with the long name I will change it again.
I hope I've explained everything about this changeset.

Also SekeRob, I would really appreciate if you entered the Telegram group for the Italian OSM community.
SekeRob (2022-11-04 11:00:12+00:00): Actually there's a wiki statement that says that: In case of a naming dispute, that what's on the road sign prevails", period, something in that wording. i.e. Via Cavour per the pole sign is indisputable no matter what, I have seen nowhere anytime different for this name, coincidentally day before in Ortona, and updated, etymology and all. When surveying with SC and leaving a mapnote, I will attach a phto of the sign to back it up. Unfortunately SC images disappear about 14 days after the note is marked complete which is why JOSM now gives a warning for links to these images.

PS, I make exception for the initials in street names, so changed e.g. Via D. Pugliese to Via Domenico Pugliese. Also wiki supported (The wall sign actually says Dom. Pugliese). The data consumers are free to abbreviate mechanically if they want. Bar the fat finger typos I leave, the correctors better have a good story.

ciao
damianeue (2022-11-04 11:45:11+00:00): The name on the street poles is "Via Cavour", but since it is also the name of a Piedmont town it is specified (on the same poles) that the name refers to a person, quoting his birth and death year, also with his job. That's why I put there the name:etimology:wikipedia tag (as you asked me some time ago for Via Mahatma Gandhi).
SekeRob (2022-11-04 12:04:16+00:00): Doubtlessly there are Via Cavour's that refer to the town, but usually there will be a context of surrounding streets w/ town names. Stand alone, never would think of a town.
yasslay (2022-11-02 18:03:12+00:00): Also moved the retail landuse for the town centre to not go over the post office, as per the wiki guidelines.
gendy54 (2024-12-28 17:32:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vois que les adresses ne sont reliées à rien et ont juste des numéros. Ils faut soit les ajouter sous forme de relation ou rajouter le nom de la voie sur chaque adresse pour que ce soit pris en compte.
marczoutendijk (2022-11-02 19:43:38+00:00): Source=JOSM!
marczoutendijk (2022-11-02 19:43:28+00:00): Source=JOSM!
marczoutendijk (2022-11-02 19:43:17+00:00): Source=JOSM!
marczoutendijk (2022-11-02 19:43:09+00:00): Source=JOSM!
marczoutendijk (2022-11-02 19:42:58+00:00): Source=JOSM!
ybungalobill (2022-11-08 19:04:39+00:00): please use the correct brand name; this is a Dollar General, not a "Dollar Store".
marczoutendijk (2022-11-02 19:42:50+00:00): Source=JOSM!
marczoutendijk (2022-11-02 19:42:35+00:00): Source=JOSM!
marczoutendijk (2022-11-02 19:42:12+00:00): Source=JOSM!
ivanbranco (2022-11-02 19:39:17+00:00): Hi peterf4450, thanks for the edits and welcome to OSM :)

I noticed a couple things: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10152168121
here you mapped a rest area (with wifi), that is a place where "where a driver can stop" but you mapped next to a path.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10152168025
this name seems a description instead, can you confirm it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10152168122
tourism=attraction alone doesn't give much information, a good idea would be to add a description with the tag description=* next time.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2476128573/history
this doesn't seem to be the chinese name of the Esso brand

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10152168023/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10152168021
here you mapped two supermarkets in the middle of two parking lots

also try to upload smaller changeset areas, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

if you need help you could take in consideration to join a Telegram group: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts#Asia

good mapping :)
Filip009 (2022-11-02 20:26:22+00:00): Are these new paths publicly accessible?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1109717118
juleteq_ (2022-11-06 18:52:20+00:00): It's illegal to walk on them. If they catch you, it would cost you 500 euro. They are pretty easy to find, if thats what you mean.
Filip009 (2022-11-06 20:58:02+00:00): Then please add tag access=no to them ;)
juleteq_ (2022-11-06 22:37:09+00:00): sure, sorry
Carto_Graph (2022-11-11 20:17:34+00:00): Можно узнать из каких источников вы берете информацию?
ybungalobill (2022-11-08 19:02:33+00:00): the street sign says 'GERARD DR'; do not add a duplicate feature with an incorrect spelling.
Fl1tzi (2022-11-02 19:03:18+00:00): *ein cycleway=seperate für Radfahrer.
mcliquid (2022-11-03 13:29:13+00:00): What's the name of the hotel? And is it actually in a building?
NieWnen (2022-11-03 11:53:25+00:00): Tutaj już był oznaczony przejazd. Coś poszło nie tak i teraz ścieżka rowerowa została podłączona do przejścia dla pieszych i w innych miejscach zostały zduplikowane ścieżki. 
To co znalazłem poprawiłem.
impiaaa (2022-11-05 18:04:01+00:00): These are clearly not cave entrances.
SomeoneElse (2022-11-07 10:25:15+00:00): Hello again.
In https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6496 I asked you to try and talk to other mappers more so that everyone can understand what everyone else wants to do here.  Unfortunately this is just a "revert without comment" - none of the changesets that create, delete and recreate https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/951838450/history have any comment on them.
Please do try and talk to people in order to break the "revert cycle" that will surely happen if you fail to do that.
Best Regards,
Andy
Allison P (2022-11-11 16:51:03+00:00): Please expand road suffixes. They are easy for data consumers to shorten but difficult to expand. Thank you for adding these new subdivisions!
eggie (2022-11-03 11:39:47+00:00): Dag Schepers.. Je vraagt feedback.. 

Er klopt iets niet met de openingstijden.
Mo-Fr 09:00-16:00; Sa 08:00-12:00; Sa 13:00-12:00; Sa 13:00-16:00

Ik gebruik vaak deze 'tool'. Het resultaat plak ik dan in de 'waarde'. 

 

openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 
 


MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:18:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:49:24+00:00): Hi Elias,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Taquaritinga" and "Guariroba":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-48.50968&lat=-21.43893&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128408614

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-20 07:09:43+00:00): Hi Elias, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Elias Zavam (2022-12-02 23:36:17+00:00): Olá Guido,
Corrigido amigo!
elkueb (2022-11-11 12:51:13+00:00): Hallo, bist du dir bewusst, dass du hier Bankomaten einträgst?
elkueb (2022-11-20 15:48:04+00:00): Nachdem da doch nur erfundene Bankomaten die dem persönlichen Routing dienen sollen dabei waren, habe ich das Ganze mal revertet => https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129160966
SMkrtich (2022-11-03 22:38:14+00:00): Hi,

I can see you are changing the Russian names of villages without providing any source. Please rollback your changes or otherwise I need to report them as vandalism.
berndw (2022-11-04 18:39:19+00:00): ;-)
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
Steube (2022-11-21 08:25:24+00:00): Hallo MaKö,
Du hast hier offensichtlich eine von mir vor kurzem durch Vor-Ort-Begehung aktualisierte Erfassung durch Nutzung eines veralteten Luftbildes überformt. Eine Prüfung der Daten bzw. Anfrage an mich wäre hier hilfreich gewesen. Das von Dir neu eingezeichnete Gebäude ist längst abgerissen und durch die von mir gemappten Freianlagen neu gestaltet. Ich bitte um Rücknahme Deiner Änderung.
whb (2022-11-26 10:27:13+00:00): Revert erledigt:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bitte-um-revert-erledigt/5997
Bobropiton (2022-11-03 10:04:00+00:00): Мы же временное(меньше месяца) вроде не мапим? У большинства юзверей же отобразятся изменения на таком коротком промежутке
Bobropiton (2022-11-03 10:04:46+00:00): *не отобразятся
mini-me (2022-11-03 14:23:58+00:00): Просто не уследил, что оно временное
Frans S (2022-11-05 11:32:28+00:00): Hola . Por favor, cambie/utilice las imágenes de Maxar en lugar de las de Bing.
Lea las instrucciones, así como los comentarios dados en sus mapeos en varios conjuntos de cambios.

Hello . Please change / use the Maxar Imagery instead of the Bing imagery.
Read the Instructions as well as the comments on your mappings on several changesets.

Best regards
bikingaround244 (2022-11-03 02:03:35+00:00): Im not sure I would call the court yards inside the school community gardens. 

"garden:type=community - Located in parks or other public spaces, community gardens are operated by an informal group of local residents. To some, community gardening is a leisurely social activity. To others, it is a response to concerns about food security. See  Community gardening." 
see wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:garden:type

I think the grass tag might be more appropriate.
MushroomMan (2022-11-03 18:28:35+00:00): Correction: Source used was SDFE.
Pan (2023-08-06 23:51:48+00:00): A lot of these buildings are not buildings.

Beaucoup de ces bâtiments ne sont pas des bâtiments.
gendy54 (2023-11-28 15:58:57+00:00): Location de voiture ou borne de recharge pour véhicule électrique ?
D'ailleurs, le nom est superflu.
kubahahaha (2022-11-03 11:42:00+00:00): Cześć. Jakie tu są adresy?
Bo w uwadze ktoś napisał Sucharskiego 102a-102f, a w danych urzędowych widzę Spacerowa 1-25
Lars_TheViking (2022-11-04 22:05:06+00:00): Hi foreigner037, thanks for mapping! I noticed on these roads, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1109758710 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163926583 that you have been removing “highway=construction” tags and replacing them with “highway=*” tags. I see you have been leaving “access=no” tags on these unopened highways, but as I understand global OSM policy for construction https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction, segments such as this should remain as “highway=construction” until the highways are fully finished and open to the public. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/695793995 is correctly modeled with “highway=construction” and “construction=motorway” tags, but at low zoom levels, the surrounding highways give the misleading impression that these highways are open (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/41.9441/23.1032). Is there a reason why you are removing construction tags before the highways are open to traffic?
 
Thanks, and looking forward to your response.
foreigner037 (2022-11-05 07:04:52+00:00): Hey,

It wasn't me that actually started doing this. A while ago on this changeset I noticed another user doing this and it made sense to me. What is the access tag otherwise for? The road here is essentially finished, there is no construction ongoing at the moment and there will be no further happening too. I don't know about the global OSM policy, but the Bulgarian OSM road policies don't mention anything and because of some specifics in Bulgaria they don't always make sense compared to the global one.
foreigner037 (2022-11-05 07:07:43+00:00): Plus, having the access=no tag ensures no routing algorithm will use these sections, which I think is more important than the purely visual aspect.
Lars_TheViking (2022-11-08 23:16:23+00:00): Hi foreigner037, thank you for your thoughtful and detailed response. This policy is one of those that is certainly up for interpretation, so I can understand your point of view. The combination of the tags `highway=construction` and `construction=*` will block routing on its own, without `access=no` being necessary, according to global construction modeling policy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction). The only mention of `access` tags on this page is in reference to removing them upon completion of construction. So even though portions of the highway may have completed construction, best practice is normally to leave the construction tag present until the highway is open for traffic. However, our team does follow local, established editing practices, so if there is consensus among the local Bulgarian community regarding construction modeling, would your community be willing to document this somewhere for reference? Your input is appreciated!
foreigner037 (2022-11-09 08:56:24+00:00): There is no consensus as I think it hasn't come up as a topic of discussion yet. Maybe the policy should be to leave any currently ongoing construction projects as highway=construction, while long finished projects should stick to access=no. Such a project is the end of II-89, which was finished before 2015 and hasn't seen any construction since. The two cloverleafs on the A6 in Sofia have the same story.
Lars_TheViking (2022-11-10 01:24:55+00:00): Hi again foreigner037, I think your perspective makes sense and your proposed tagging method is a good idea. Ideally we could have this documented in the OSM community for Bulgaria if there are numerous examples of partially finished projects that haven't seen construction for a long time. Based on this tagging proposal, since the A 3 motorway between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692493755 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086791232 appears to be under current construction, would you be open to tagging this back as highway=construction and construction=motorway to keep it consistent? Thank you again for your input on this!
foreigner037 (2022-11-10 07:52:07+00:00): I will do that. Would you mind changing the previously mentioned object aswell then?
Lars_TheViking (2022-11-11 18:55:26+00:00): Yes, I can do that. Thanks!