piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gergely 355346 (2021-04-09 11:28:13+00:00): Great, thanks for letting me know! 

What do you think would then be the best way to indicate a road that
- is narrow (of approx 4m wide)
- has no lane markings
- is of (relatively) low traffic
- has a tarmac surface (or alike)
and consequently can be used well with a hybrid/road bike?

Example: https://goo.gl/maps/d9kLpVN1ZHpzQwUM8

I understand that some of these attributes are relative or subjective, yet I would love to find a way to build a database of these roads around my area (to start with).

Thanks!
SK53 (2021-04-11 12:22:52+00:00): Hi,

Search for some of these terms on the wiki:

* for road width: width or minwidth for the narrowest section. If you make the measurement option available one can now make reasonable measurements on the aerial imagery (or if you feel particularly enthusiastic a tape measure in the field!). In general I'd assume a lanes=1 road was about 4-5 m wide as a default. I believe SomoneElse's rendering shows very narrow roads (https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=15&lat=54.209&lon=-1.23322) as well as more detail in rural areas
* traffic density is not really something we can map as it changes over the day and over time (I think there was some effort to map signed quiet ways in the past though). For busy roads there is DoT survey data which people have merged with OSM data when building cycle routers
* surface=asphalt or paved for regular roads
* smoothness : rather subjective, but in use
* tracktype: as the name implies this is for tracks & some service roads, but can be applicable on some very minor public roads (e.g., those with grass growing in the centre)
* giveway signs help establish the road priority even on a network of minor roads so may help (supported in the editor)
* verge (works like the sidewalk tag) to say whether there are (flat) verges on either side of the road (v. useful for walkers if a road is narrow)

Although as Bernard says absence of road markings may not have a well-established tag, it is something which is repeatably observable & I'd say perfectly reasonable to add to OSM.

I think it's an interesting project & probably useful to have one area where someone has approached this systematically.

Jerry aka SK53
pra_veen (2021-04-12 03:53:54+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential and teritary road 
kindly check with way 28868575.
with the corrected changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102766429
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102626394
Rookie Pro Nigga (2021-06-09 14:14:23+00:00): residential road is wrongly tagged as motorway.
pra_veen (2021-04-12 03:48:14+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 116073507,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102766081
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102626576
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 23:31:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103298014, 103298513 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
aceman444 (2021-12-18 16:38:13+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za "rozdelenie"/oznacenie jednej casti domu spravnym nazvom "apartmanovy dom Lucky 188". Ale preco ste ho z budovy (co bolo spravne) zmenili len na "obytnu oblast" (cize len vseobecne zastavane uzemie pod domami)? Opravim to, ale davajte na to pozor. Taktiez prosim uvadzajte zdroj Vasich udajov. Na snimkach Bing nazov nemozete vidiet. Dakujem.
abrensch (2021-04-11 13:05:41+00:00): Hallo dolomynum,

correct tagging would be:

access:conditional=no @ (22:00-06:00)

the current version is read as an "unknown" access type and thus considered access=no

regards, Arndt
dolomynum (2021-04-11 13:11:41+00:00): Hi Arndt!

Sorry, my mistake, thanks for notifying me. Fixed now.

Kind regards,
Gergely
dade76mtb (2021-12-27 18:55:23+00:00): Ciao Luca...mi dai info su questo percorso.?ho provato a farlo... il primo pezzo da Gerbole è percorribile ma ad un certo punto si perde nella vegetazione..
lucadelu (2022-01-03 06:15:32+00:00): Ciao, i dati sono quelli che mi ha passato il CAI, pensavo fosse aggiornati. se i sentieri non si vedono più potresti usare il tag trail_visibility per segnalare la visibilità.
dade76mtb (2022-01-03 10:08:53+00:00): Si ho fatto così... Ieri sono passato a vedere dalla parte opposta a salire da Vallenervi ma il sentiero diventa impraticabile da rovi, vegetazione e alberi caduti... È un peccato quella zona è magnifica
ash_win (2021-04-12 13:15:51+00:00): Hi haoranzhang,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 834840446
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102806809
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102627583
abakus_uploader (2021-04-09 22:32:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2021-11-22 17:58:43+00:00): Drogi, które dodałeś, w większości nie istnieją.
Wprowadziłeś ściezki/dróżki sprzed kilkudziesięciu lat.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 06:43:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8610375123/history - is it only office or is there really also shop there?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-03-20 14:09:42+00:00): It is a webshop,
I changed it.
eggie (2021-04-09 11:16:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedback.. Prima gelukt.
Je zou evt nog kunnen bijtaggen om wat voor een soort fietspad het gaat.
Zie
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 
MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2021-04-13 11:59:28+00:00): Hi,
you used two tags here that look like a mistake:
id_centrale=198600
n_prog=27

Could you check that?
ualios (2021-04-13 16:58:56+00:00): Tags used to identify the station in the network (id_centrale=station number and n_prog=progressive number). Tag useless or not appropriate?
mueschel (2021-04-13 17:06:41+00:00): If these numbers are useful for some OSM user, they are fine to add.

The keys should be changed to something like "ref" or "ref:XYZ" - where XYZ is an identification of who gives the reference number.
ualios (2021-04-14 08:39:59+00:00): Ok, tag n_prog removed as useless. Tag id_centrale changed to ref. Thanks
Peter Bremer (2021-08-17 17:14:40+00:00): Hi Fennecus, could you inform me what the reasoning is for removing drawn sidewalks (which offer a higher level of detail) and replace them with sidewalk attributes (a lower level of detail)?
Wulfmorn (2021-08-24 10:08:07+00:00): I took a look at the case of Tordenskiolds gate and it is my opinion that a separate sidewalk-way does not offer any particular benefits in this case. Sometimes more data does not mean more quality. Sidewalk mapping is one of the grayest zones of OSM-mapping and my preference is local uniformity. All the surrounding streets are mapped with sidewalk=*, so having one single separate sidewalk might be worse.

This street also has no sidewalk separation from the road until it reaches the intersections with Telthusgata and Tamburgata, so its pretty uniform.

Deletion of data is always a tricky question, but I personally would not have mapped separate sidewalks on that particular street in the first place.
FennecusZerda (2021-08-29 21:44:52+00:00): Thanks Wulfman. I'm still learning here, and I've had a separate discussion with Peter over OSM messages. I see both sides of the argument here. Separately, I've raised a general question about this with Entur, who are actively contributing to and using OTP for routing suggestions for the whole of Norway. I think it is important to also hear what they consider to be best practises, based on their knowledge of Norwegian roads used for walking, cycling and public transport in combination with the slightly strange laws concerning pavement cycling (and e-scoters). …As I guess you know about.
Patchanka (2025-11-22 17:06:39+00:00): bonjour @OT Hossegor
pouvez-vous vérifier le n° de téléphone de cet établissement "Les Jardins d'Hossegor", en effet il y a actuellement des chiffres en trop, le n° que vous avez indiqué n'est pas valide.
merci d'avance
OT Hossegor (2025-11-25 13:39:35+00:00): Merci Patchanka, le numéro a bien été mis à jour. Merci pour votre contribution.
eggie (2021-04-09 11:35:21+00:00): Hi bergdo.. Your comment is drinkwaterkraan..  but your edit is a vetenary without name.
In OSM we tag at the addressnode.
Whats is the housenumber and name?
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-04-09 11:46:08+00:00): Aangepast..  name website phone
gr eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2021-04-09 13:27:38+00:00): Ciao. La chiave inscription è usata per specificare il testo delle iscrizioni su edifici, monumenti,  ecc. In questo caso il testo è "nothing". Non vuol dire che non c'è una iscrizione. Pertanto l'etichetta è da rimuovere. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102629630
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-09 10:56:51+00:00): This is a live database :-) Change reverted.
alesarrett (2021-04-09 10:17:42+00:00): Grazie per questa prima modifica
habi (2021-04-09 09:45:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
NieWnen (2021-04-09 18:08:09+00:00): Nie mapujemy budynków po konturze dachu, tylko od podstawy. Mimo, że wygląda wtedy na przesunięte to wtedy jest ok. W edytorze ID jest dostępna po prawej stronie warstwa Ewidencja Budynków, która wyświetla ładne czerwone kontury.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102629853
habi (2021-04-09 09:49:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
habi (2021-04-09 09:49:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
habi (2021-04-09 09:52:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
NieWnen (2021-04-09 18:09:57+00:00): Jest ok.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102631378
ash_win (2021-04-12 12:56:42+00:00): Hi TSAIWINNIE,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential road.Kindly check way 840732221
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102805524
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102632167
eggie (2021-04-09 11:24:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback.. Een 'note= Vanuit de Javastraat kan kan de draai niet worden gemaakt naar de willemstraat.' .. gaat niet werken in de routering.
Wel kan de gemeente dan een bord plaatsen , maar dit kan pas worden aangepast middels tunR-erestrictie of hgv=no in OSM als het bord daadwerkelijk aanwezig is. 
Ook kan de breedte van de weg getagd worden.
In bepaalde routing apps kan de max wegbreedte worden ingesteld.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxwidth (ook alleen bij bebording)

en 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width
Dus svp contact opnemen met de wegbeheerder en liever niet iets zomaar aanpassen in OSM.

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-09 11:25:54+00:00): typo turn_restictie  Bv verboden linksaf voor vrachtwagens .. maar dan eerst het bord..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 23:30:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103298014, 103298513 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
Patchanka (2021-04-09 15:25:22+00:00): bonjour
quelques remarques par rapport à cette modif :
- le name "Terrain de pétanque" ressemble plus à la description de ce que c'est qu'à un nom. Il y a vraiment écrit ce nom là quelque part ?
C'est pareil pour l'aire de jeux nommée "Aire de jeux" juste à côté
- vous avez créé 2 terrains de pétanque, un en point et un en surface, surement une fausse manip' ?
- n'hésitez pas à utiliser le raccourci clavier Q (fonctionne sur ID et JOSM) pour rendre les rectangles bien rectangulaires !
bonne soirée
Nathan OT Terres de Chalosse (2021-04-09 15:36:11+00:00): merci, c'est modifié
ALu68 (2021-04-09 19:11:16+00:00): In diesem Fall bitte keine Knoten löschen, sondern einen Lifecycle prefix verwenden https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4439493100
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/687951425

Danke.
habi (2021-04-09 10:33:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-20 22:37:48+00:00): Hi ghar_07. Your edit looks awesome, but geometry highway:Service (Way 928231362) due crossing with waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/928231362). 

If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143788120). Thank you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 11:19:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103529798, 103531278 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 11:19:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103529798, 103531278 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
flohoff (2021-04-09 14:28:11+00:00): Moin,
sag mal dieser weg:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/928235176

und die verlängerung - Da hast du ein "bicycle=no" drauf getagged. Sind da Fahrräder wirklich verboten? Ist ja wenn echt ne seltene Sache.

Flo
daPhipz (2021-04-09 17:47:07+00:00): Nö, Fahrräder sind auf dem gesamten Fußweg (von Wortstraße am Spielplatz vorbei bis Prälat-Buschmeier-Str.) erlaubt. Ich habe diese Änderungen mithilfe der App StreetComplete gemacht, vielleicht liegt es an der App...
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:47:37+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:48:54+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
habi (2021-04-09 10:50:01+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
PT-53 (2021-04-10 05:58:37+00:00): Hallo peperoooney,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113626487/history
das Merkmal
foot=yes
ergänzt.
Meines Wissens nach steht dort aber ein Verkehrszeichen # 237
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113626487/history
Danach dürften Fußgänger diesen Weg nicht benutzen. Für diese gibt es diesen Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136653628/history

Hat sich da was geändert ?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2021-04-18 07:39:40+00:00): Hallo peperoooney, 
ich würde mich noch über eine Antwort freuen.
Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2021-04-25 07:00:26+00:00): Hallo peperoooney, 
nachdem Du leider nicht geantwortet hast, habe ich Deine Änderung heute zurückgesetzt.
Grüße
Korgi1 (2021-08-02 20:10:32+00:00): Please don't use Microsoft footprints when they clearly don't match at all.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-08-08 21:39:31+00:00): Dear Johnny Mapperseed, 

It is a requirement of OSM that every community member communicates with fellow mappers, especially other local mappers who wish to discuss the quality of a changeset. Please consider my message a reminder that Korgi1 wishes to discuss some mapping practices with you. 

Best regards,

Casper
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-08-18 23:58:36+00:00): Hello,

Apologies that I missed this message. I'll review my changeset and fix any issues.

Thank you for your time!
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-08-19 00:01:18+00:00): Ah, it looks like you've beat me to fixing it. I'll be reviewing my practices to see how I messed up this badly.
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-08-19 00:28:18+00:00): I took another look at RapID for the area, and the Microsoft footprints appear to line up well enough to Bing sat imagery and OSIP sat imagery for the kind of margin of error that I am used to working with. 

While I manually selected objects in RapID that I wanted to add to the map, I should acknowledge that my interpretations of imagery aren't perfect, and that may interfere with a more quality focused mapping style such as yours. Looking at what you've made here has seriously impressed me, and it is clear you are a skilled mapper who values data quality highly. I will refrain from using RapID in areas where you map without asking first to avoid such conflicts in the future. 

If I have any prior edits which you feel are not up to the quality you want from the area, please let me know and I will do my best to fix them. Thank you, and please accept my apologies.
Korgi1 (2021-08-19 00:30:13+00:00): So you are probably not aware, but a large portion of the OSM community considers microsoft/rapid footprints to be junk imports and it can admittedly be difficult to see on older/lower quality aerials. Often times, the footprint created by the database grossly misrepresents the actual building shape, commonly either simplifying the building and ignoring sections or converting multiple buildings into one shape. On top of this, the footprints tend to be randomly distributed away from the actual location, with even square buildings being the wrong rotation and distance away from any aerial. I'm assuming you might have been editing in sort of a "zen" fashion which partnered with a aerial like Bing can make it more difficult to spot the inaccuracies.  I just happened to notice you had added some here(and plenty of others across Ohio) and just wanted to make sure you were aware of their potential harmful nature.
Korgi1 (2021-08-19 00:30:37+00:00): Sorry you posted right before I did.
Korgi1 (2021-08-19 00:32:01+00:00): In terms of "where I map" I tend to skip around a lot and sometimes will do a lot of work in Ohio areas but then not for a while. It's hard to just say I'm going to map X when I might become busy irl with college.
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-08-19 00:51:59+00:00): I'm busy with college too, so I totally understand. Earlier this year I said I was gonna get Williams county done by May.  Given this conversation, it's probably a good thing I didn't!

I knew they weren't always perfect, but I didn't realize they were considered junk. That's quite unfortunate, but if that's the reality then so be it. I was blown away by the Facebook presentation at SOTM US 2016, so perhaps I put too much faith in the tech due to the wow factor of the demonstration in a controlled environment. Given this info, I think I'll simply abstain from RapID entirely for normal editing, unless there's serious improvements with more community consensus, or if it's requested by HOT for a task or something like that.
Korgi1 (2021-08-19 00:54:03+00:00): I mean you've done a ton of work doing landuse in Ohio Rapid or not so thats great.
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-08-19 00:58:47+00:00): Thanks! It's kind of relaxing for me strangely enough, so it's kind of a mutually beneficial activity for me.
Korgi1 (2021-08-19 02:46:17+00:00): I tried my hand at it and it isn't my thing. But more space for you to work I suppose.
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-08-19 03:02:36+00:00): That's fair. Back in the day I kind of didn't care to expand beyond the immediate borders of my cities of interest and the areas where I biked to (Houcktown, Findlay, Bowling Green) until I found out that a local ISP and a BGSU professor were using it, so I felt like it would be good to provide them with some expanded data, and got a bit hooked again.
DressyPear4 (2021-04-10 09:58:25+00:00): Olá, se o local não possui nome deixe esse campo em branco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102637325
pyrog (2021-09-07 06:42:18+00:00): Salut,

Ici tu utilises office=cooperative alors qu'ailleurs c'est shop=clothes + second_hand=only

Amicalement,
Yves
Carto'Cité (2021-09-09 08:31:39+00:00): Bien vu. J'ai corrigé https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8610835907
Antoine.
Pikse (2021-05-10 12:09:20+00:00): Here shaping/correcting results in incorrect border segment that deviates from actual national border. Again, this is the same issue as previously with border around Acupīte river[1]. See your change[2] and correct border in this location on Maa-amet map[3].

Also, please note that border segments being named as "country - country" are generally unwanted. As you can see from way history[2] such names already have been removed by DWG.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62084029
[2] https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/45500632
[3] https://xgis.maaamet.ee/xgis2/page/link/Wb7R-M4
SomeoneElse (2021-05-03 18:39:22+00:00): Hello Ni Chen and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please don't name things after yourself, like you have at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/928143238  .  Also, please make sure that you square buildings with "q" if they really are rectangular.
Best Regards,
Andy