piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Allison P (2021-02-09 15:19:24+00:00): Well I'm glad someone likes them.
wireguy (2021-02-09 13:22:15+00:00): Hi ScantLeopard, the baseball fields appear to be drawn a bit too large, you may want to adjust.   The two rectangular fields are sport=lacrosse.   You may want to trim the wooded area that overlaps the park.  Keep mapping!   If you want there is a discord and slack server with other mappers that can help with questions.
ScantLeopard336 (2021-02-09 19:29:59+00:00): @wireguy Thanks for the heads up on the lacrosse field. I didn't recognize them, so I kept the tag generic.

For mapping baseball fields, I typically follow the baseline and outfield fence when I can, which certainly looks weird for this field. Should I keep it along the fence, or shorten it to an arbitrary spot in the outfield?
wireguy (2021-02-09 19:58:54+00:00): Yeah, I think that an arbitrary spot makes more sense for this case.   Thanks for adding the details!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
ivanbranco (2021-02-10 15:40:41+00:00): The ref was already present in the ref=* tag, you duplicated it with UNIQUE ID=*.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
PT-53 (2021-02-09 08:12:35+00:00): Hallo helad18,
Deine Änderungen waren teilweise fehlerhaft (z.B. name=https://kosmetik-irma.de). Ich habe diese daher wieder zurückgesetzt, Deine Änderung der Website aber übernommen.
Grüße
News General (2021-02-09 15:04:33+00:00): Bacoor East and west boundaries please
VIPINDAS K (2021-02-09 17:22:32+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q) ...check it...
Happy mapping...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98947951
seav (2021-02-11 05:25:12+00:00): This has been reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99077115

Reason: Municipal waters (R.A. 8550) is part of the jurisdiction of LGUs.
tastrax (2021-02-20 23:06:04+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
marczoutendijk (2021-12-01 14:00:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905297249
amenity=amenity???
marczoutendijk (2021-12-01 14:01:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905297554
amenity=amenity????
Quimby5 (2021-02-24 23:22:30+00:00): Hi, what is your source for this name change?  I have never heard it called this colloquially or locally, nor does the Ministry of Transportation list this as a name (link below).  AFAIK, all numbered routes are just that: Numbered highways.
Can you please point to the naming authority that lists this name if I missed it?

https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/transportation-reports-and-reference/reference-information/numbered-routes
DENelson83 (2021-02-25 00:02:06+00:00): "Selkirk Highway" seemed like the most logical name to me for this highway.

I can put in a tag "official_name=Balfour-Kaslo-Galena Bay Highway" if you wish.
Quimby5 (2021-02-25 00:14:25+00:00): I guess I was politely suggesting that the proper name for this is "Highway 31" because that's what it's called, and that's how it is signed.  Selkirk Highway might be best tagged under alt_name=*
DENelson83 (2021-02-25 00:25:34+00:00): Except that would be redundant.  "31" is already in the "ref" tag, and on OsmAnd in navigation mode, it would show up as "31 Highway 31".
Quimby5 (2021-02-25 01:05:33+00:00): Modifying the data to fix software/labeling is not the correct way to go about this .... 

However ... I agree there is redundancy for those sections that are both "name=Highway 31" and "ref=31". In those instances, ref=31 without a name=* should be sufficient.

The underlying issue with this changeset is your use of "name=Selkirk Highway".  This is not an official name, nor a locally used name, nor does it appear on any signs I've found. I can't even find it in a google search, so it does not follow any OSM convention for the name tag.
DENelson83 (2021-02-25 02:21:24+00:00): It's the name that I chose, because it's the name that I felt suited the highway best.  If you feel that is too subjective, then I will let you change it to what you feel is best, and I will not touch it again.
Quimby5 (2021-02-25 03:19:56+00:00): Yes, that's pretty subjective. I have reverted this with changeset 99939408.
DENelson83 (2021-02-25 03:27:53+00:00): Understood.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:12:59+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Hannifin Parker (2021-02-12 10:02:20+00:00): IMHO you've connected rivers from different basins across the drainage divide.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
sgmamz (2021-02-09 06:52:45+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI

Regards,
Sgmamz.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
compdude (2021-02-15 01:39:54+00:00): I drove this road this past October and it's definitely a trunk. It has a 50 mph speed limit, which I'd say is high enough to qualify as trunk.
compdude (2021-03-01 04:46:48+00:00): I haven't heard back from you but I really think this should be a trunk road. Any objections to me changing it back? Have you driven this road yourself?
compdude (2021-03-14 00:10:10+00:00): Having not heard any response from you, I'm changing this back to trunk.
juminet (2021-02-10 20:33:43+00:00): Bonjour Thaure et bienvenue sur OSM!

Pour une bulle à verre, on utilise bien le tag recycling:glass_bottles = yes, mais vous avez aussi utilisé recycling:glass = yes. Or ce dernier tag est destiné au recyclage de verre plat dans les recyparks. 

Si vous avez voulu cartographier une bulle à verre, vous pouvez enlever le tag recycling:glass=yes. 

Bonne continuation sur OSM !

juminet
abakus_uploader (2021-02-09 23:31:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Heinz_V (2021-02-10 05:19:56+00:00): I made a changeset comment but you keep on mapping without reaction. Since it is very complicated to restore all the boundaries manually, I will revert your changeset.
karson_ (2021-02-09 14:34:49+00:00): I'm confused on why you are calling https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905316667 a building passage. Per the wiki, building passages are enclosed on 2 sides by walls of the building and above by interior parts of the building. 

In a case like this, the "passage", as you are calling it, has a wall on one side and is open on the other 3 sides and does not have any part of the building above it, just a roof. It should be very obvious from the aerial imagery that this is the case.
pantus (2021-02-11 10:26:17+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for the info, we are modifying it as covered=yes to rightly represent this in the changeset(#99098591). Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
pantus.
QuigleyJones (2021-02-13 04:54:49+00:00): Best practice for deleting closed stores is to remove the store attributes while leaving the address info.
GoogleMapMaker (2021-02-13 05:31:02+00:00): Hi QuigleyJones, and thank you for your feedback. 
I originally thought that when a business closes permanently, the point is to be deleted. I'll remember this for next time!

- Jordan (GoogleMapMaker)
seav (2021-02-10 06:34:30+00:00): This has been reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99018564

Reason: Municipal waters (R.A. 8550) is part of the jurisdiction of LGUs.
seav (2021-02-10 06:52:14+00:00): Also partially reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99019678
eggie (2021-02-09 08:07:09+00:00): Dag Vancee.. Zoe eens permit op in de wiki. Dat is iets heel anders.
Denk duys beter emergency=yes yoevoegen op bollard en fietspad.
MVG
eggie
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-12 09:28:14+00:00): Hi, it would be great if you could be more specific in your changeset descriptions. I can't tell everything you've done here, but maybe something like "Adding areas of scree and bare rock and..." would help other mappers to understand what you've done, and then the difference between all of your changsets.
user_12630788 (2021-02-12 09:34:55+00:00): Hi, I think we have talked before, I change user name regularly. Being doing this for 10 years.
If I do a Museum in London say, i'll be very specific as it's incredibly important to understand, and I wont delete anything as history will be lost.
but mostly I map terrain in the mountains to help me Hike and camp. To remember if I've done, rocks, screes, scrub, walls, fords, streams, cliffs, trees, tracks and which ones in which change is an onerous task and I would probably stop mapping as it's not a good use of my personal time, which I'm happy to do if that's the consensus. 
However be rest assured, that anything worthwhile even like a shop in ambleside will be indicated correctly.
user_12630788 (2021-02-12 09:36:17+00:00): Maybe I'll change it to "general rural terrain and features updating"
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-12 09:44:08+00:00): Hmm, not sure if we've talked or not, I do feel like I've seen a few of your other accounts during my editing though.
When I edit I don't feel like it's too tricky to remember what I've done in each changset (maybe do smaller changsets?). And I assume there is some distinction between your various changsets?
user_12630788 (2021-02-12 09:48:50+00:00): No distinction at all. I pick a mountain I've not been to for a while, and do whatever rural and natural feature is not done to make it look more accurate.
If while I'm doing it, my interest is piqued, probably an old mine or historical stone circle or peat hut etc., I'll go for a hike or a camp there.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 10:45:43+00:00): Right, well even just adding the mountain you were editing on at the time would help a bit.
user_12630788 (2021-02-14 09:23:05+00:00): Can you please tell me what parts of the Osm team you officially represent?
As I said, I add major change set notes to things that matter like museums, Doctors, hospitals, hotels. But not to minutiae like this.
I will check with the powers that be, the people that elected you I guess, if they agree my updates are more harmful them good and not adding details to minutiae change set descriptions are damaging?
I am currently going through deleting as many as my old users as I can find back 12 years as I can.
If they agree with you, I won't return as collating on a note pad for a change set description how many trees i add, or did i add  a small zig zag to a tiny stream too onerous for such insignificant items. There are certainly way worse change set descriptions them mine.
Thank you for your time.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 18:17:28+00:00): I don't represent OSM in any way, just another mapper. I was just reviewing some changesets.
I wasn't meaning that you should specify every single change you've made, but just a description of what you've done in that changeset (in particular all of your changesets had the same description, so it's helpful to understand the difference between all of them).
See here for more detail https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#How_should_I_write_Changeset_Comments.3F
Not sure why you feel the need to delete accounts, but whatever.
Also, just to say that your more recent changeset descriptions are much better, so thanks for adding more detail there.
Futur3r (2021-02-09 09:31:16+00:00): Salut, J'ai vu que tu a rajouté l'école sur le batiment. Il y a déjà un POI pour l'école nommé "École primaire publique Villaz" juste à droite. J'ai fait la correction, desfois pas tout est bon à prendre sur Streetcomplete :) 
Merci pour tes contributions et n'hésite pas à découvrir un éditeur plus poussé comme https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Fr%3AWikiStart ou https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=98931194#map=19/45.95131/6.19095. Pour plus d'information y'a le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Page_principale et si t'as besoin t'a une question : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Canaux_de_contact 
A+
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98956983
Futur3r (2021-02-09 09:38:22+00:00): Excuse moi, j'ai cru que c'était la même erreur.
Pour le centre aéré : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre#Groupe_utilisateur
Et pour la garderie :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten

J'ai fait aucune modif du cp :)
eggie (2021-02-09 08:50:57+00:00): Dag Vancee Kijk eens naar je foutmelding

De vebinding 
Boekelose Stoomblekerij en voetpad ontbreekt.

Beter als achtergrond PDOK actueel gebruiken. Je voetpad ligt er volledig naast.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-09 09:01:47+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1
Hier dus..  https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.20455/6.80707
vancee (2021-02-09 09:24:25+00:00): Dank voor je feedback! Heel leuk om te merken dat dit zo leeft. Ik heb je opmerkingen doorgevoerd. Misschien kun je me helpen met de PDOK kaarten. Ik heb geen idee hoe ik die erachter krijg zodat ik de positie van het voetpad kan corrigeren. Hoe werkt dat?
eggie (2021-02-09 09:27:21+00:00): Dag Vancee. Zelf gebruik ik die ediotor niet. Ben een josm mapper.
Dus even uit m'n hoofd. 
Rechts in het scherm in de bewerkingsmodus kun je kiezen voor achtergrondlagen. Daar moet de PDOK actueel bijstaan. 
Probeer het even. Lukt het niet dan zal ik wel even in iD kijken. 
eggie
eggie (2021-02-09 09:30:16+00:00): Even gekeken.. en dus klikken op de drie laagjes in de editmodus rechts in het scher,. Dan kiezen voor de bovenste optie PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 25cm 
Bij mij stond ook die verkeerde laag aan. 
succes,
vancee (2021-02-09 10:27:49+00:00): Had het inmiddels gevonden. Als ik naar pdok.nl/viewer ga kan ik ook de BGT achtergrondkaart of OpenTopo achtergrondkaart bekijken. Die leken me zo mogelijk nog accurater. Maar die krijg je niet in iD, toch?
Ik heb ook even naar JOSM gekeken. Heel interessant, maar die laat ik nog maar even links liggen.
Ik hoop dat de correctie die ik nu gedaan heb is zoals je bedoeld. Nogmaals dank!
eggie (2021-02-09 10:41:12+00:00): Je kunt de BGT overigens wel in iD krijgen als je de url  link intypt, maar het beklijft niet. Je moet dat telkens opnieuw doen.
Josm lijkt lastig, maar dat valt reuzemee.
Hier wat leesvoer
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 

BGT implementeren  
(deze optie gebruik ik het meest)
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 
(Dit kan ook dan heb je nog een voorgebakken layer met nog veel meer) 
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg
eggie (2021-02-09 10:44:47+00:00): Denk deze link gebruiken https://service.pdok.nl/hwh/luchtfotorgb/wms/v1_0?&request=GetCapabilities&service=wms
eggie (2021-02-09 10:45:44+00:00): ... dan voor de pdok..  en
deze voor de BGT
https://geodata.nationaalgeoregister.nl/tiles/service/wmts?SERVICE=WMTS&request=GetCapabilities
eggie (2021-02-09 10:48:43+00:00): Verder de nieuwste layers van soms januari dit jaar www.satellietdataportaal.nl
Kan ook in josm als achtergrond.
eggie (2021-02-09 08:52:51+00:00): footway	sidewalk klopt hier niet.  Die regel kun je beter verwijderen. 
gr eggie
DD1GJ (2021-05-22 07:09:30+00:00): Hi, You had this path marked as private after complaints from the property owner. However, after 3 months, the path is still marked on the komoot map with MTB S4 

https://www.komoot.de/plan/@48.9307846,8.8876525,19z

Please make sure that the company you work for no longer displays MTB scales on their maps for private trails and that private or closed trails are more clearly recognizable.

Please inform the CEO Markus Hallermann directly !!!

If you continue not to respond to messages from the community, I will request a blocking of this account in a week.

---

Hallo, Du hattest nach Beschwerden des Grundstücksbesitzers diesen Weg als Privat eingezeichnet. Allerdings wird der Weg nach 3 Monaten immer noch auf der komoot-Karte  mit MTB S4 

https://www.komoot.de/plan/@48.9307846,8.8876525,19z

Sorge bitte bei Der Firma, für die Du arbeitest, dafür, dass auf ihren Karten bei privaten Wegen keine MTB Scales mehr angezeigt werden und private oder gesperte Wege deutlicher erkennbar sind.

Informiere bitte direkt den CEO Markus Hallermann !!!

Wenn Du weiterhin nicht auf Nachrichten der Community reagierst, werde ich in einer Woche eine Sperrung dieses Accounts beantragen.
Access Claims (komoot) (2021-05-24 15:08:19+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für das Feedback! Es tut mir Leid, dass wir nicht früher darauf reagiert haben. Wir hatten keinen definierten Prozess für den Umgang mit Kommentaren zu unseren Bearbeitungen und haben sie daher übersehen. Wir werden in Zukunft schneller darauf reagieren.

Wir haben in den letzten Wochen einige größere Änderungen veröffentlicht, sodass private Wege klarer gekennzeichnet sind. In dem oben genannten Link kannst du das Symbol dafür sehen. Wenn man auch versucht, durch private Straße zu planen, werden diese Wege auch automatisch vermieden. Wir tun unser Bestes, um es zu vermeiden, dass Nutzer unserer App private Wege nicht merken.

Dein Feedback zu der Skala leite ich gern intern weiter. Wir zeigen die Skala genau so an, wie sie in OSM angegeben wird, aber du hast Recht, dass dies zur Verwirrung führen kann.

Wir bemühen uns sehr, mit den Bearbeitungen, die wir auf OSM vornehmen, vorsichtig umzugehen und versuchen, so viele Leute wie möglich auf OSM zu verweisen, damit sie Bearbeitungen direkt an erfahrene OSM-Editoren melden und nicht an uns. Tut mir Leid, dass wir Fehler gemacht haben. Wir tun unser Bestes auch dies zu vermeiden.
PT-53 (2021-05-24 15:54:33+00:00): >>>>   versuchen, so viele Leute wie möglich auf OSM zu verweisen, damit sie Bearbeitungen direkt an erfahrene OSM-Editoren melden und nicht an uns <<<<
Wieder einmal:
Ihr kassiert und wir sollen arbeiten !
DD1GJ (2021-05-24 22:22:18+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104187366

Hallo komoot,

danke für Deine Rückmeldung. Die MTB-Scales entwickeln sich allmählich leider zu einem Problem wie die "Pokémon-Parks". Ich habe das Gefühl, dass einige scharze Schafe bei den MTB-Fahrern eigentlich unzulässige Wege damit kennzeichnen, um tolle Outdoor-Erlebnisse planen und teilen zu können.

komoot macht es sich leider zu einfach. Bei access=no werden die Scales ausgeblendet, bei bicycle=no werden sie trotzdem angezeigt. Der komoot-Support und komoot-Schulungen empfehlen den sich beschwerenden Behörden oder verärgerten Grundstückseigentümern  Dinge, die auf die komoot-Kartenansicht keine Wirkung haben. Ganz zu schweigen von unsachgemäßen Änderungen aufgrund oberflächlicher komoot-Empfehlungen.

Die Vermeidung beim Routing funktioniert zwar, aber bei der klssischen Orientierung nach Karte hat das leider keine Wirkung.
 
Ich habe am OSM-Sonntag das Thema  "OSM-Daten im Spannungsfeld zwischen Naturschutz und Outdoor-Apps" auf die Vorschlagsliste gesetzt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FOSSGIS_2021/OSM-Sonntag

Viele Grüße, Joachim

PS: die "Privat-Kennzeichnung" des Weges ist erst auf den zweiten Blick mit der Lupe zu erkennen.