piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JIFFNET (2023-07-15 10:59:51+00:00): Szlak Południowy kończył się tak jak było to zaznaczone na OSM, na skrzyżowaniu z zielonym szlakiem pod rezerwatem Bukowica, kiedyś podobno dochodził do zamku w Lipowcu. Jeszcze parę lat temu został odmalowany odcinek z Mętkowa do Bukowicy, ale później zniknął ze spisu szlaków PTTK. W terenie znaki zostały zamalowane w tamtym miejscu?
Benoît C MdP (2022-09-20 07:47:15+00:00): Bonjour Britzz

Bizarre que le pont soit rouvert mais pas ce tronçon de voie.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095485539 
 Serait ce une erreur ?

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Britzz (2022-09-22 20:15:10+00:00): Non, pas d'erreur. J'ai depuis plus détaillé la modification du périmètre du chantier : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126520162
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 10:59:55+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Furthermore: Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Thanks.
Misiek_G (2022-11-17 11:29:46+00:00): https://budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl/#map=11.23/52.7814/19.7502


Polish mapers use it to import new adreses from Polish Geoportal.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-19 16:44:16+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

Do you know the following pages?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
grzegorz75jan (2025-05-18 14:28:35+00:00): Panie kochany. Wykonałeś sporo importów w okolicy Zgłobic, Zbylitowskiej Góry i  ogólnie okolicy. Numeracja urzędowa nie jest tu najwyższych lotów.

Bardzo dużo adresów w okolicy jest niezgodna z rzeczywistością. 

Nie wykonuj więcej importów bez przynajmniej częściowej weryfikacji w terenie. 

Znikomą część sprawdziłem na miejscu przynajmniej pod kątem numerów bo nie zawsze miałem możliwość, okazję by stwierdzić do jakiej ulicy jest przypisany numer (brak lub tylko numer na tabliczce, dom u zbiegu dwóch ulic itp. ) a parę wydzwoniłem w Gminie. 

W paru miejscach była też zmiana adresacji.

Już nie wiem czy nie lepiej wycofać te importy bo miejscami więcej szkody niż pożytku. Numery gdzieś w rowach, nieużytkach. To tylko zaciemnia obraz.
mariotomo (2022-09-18 18:26:48+00:00): hola! cambió el texto único? ahora se dice "Corrección de errores", ya no son "adding details"? :-D
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 21:11:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127172639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some recent edits by joserrg12 following their refusal to engage with the community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6427 and previous blocks.  Depending on discussion, more reverts may be needed.
Frans S (2022-09-18 13:26:35+00:00): Hello. Thank you  for Mapping here. Please upload your mappings after you are finishes with the task or want to stop. Also pay attention to square each building with the Q key.
Best regards and keep mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-26 04:37:51+00:00): You used some incline=up/down tags - do you remember what you wanted to express with it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095493264/history
L-P H (2022-09-26 11:10:35+00:00): It was no tag from me. It’s from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367455296/history#map=16/49.3328/8.5993  I splittend the way because of the different trail visibility. The first time https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/sp00n Used it in version 6 of the other way
BCNorwich (2022-09-19 10:14:57+00:00): Hi, Please be careful, you uploaded a lot of duplicated highways here. I think I've removed all the duplicates.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 21:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127172639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some recent edits by joserrg12 following their refusal to engage with the community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6427 and previous blocks.  Depending on discussion, more reverts may be needed.
user_14063915 (2022-09-19 18:48:04+00:00): Wer war das den vorher?
Sind hier mehrere Bereiche vielleicht noch betroffen?
Niiepce (2022-09-22 15:27:28+00:00): Die Änderungen kamen von Sanderauer, der jetzt anscheinend seinen Account gelöscht hat.
Weitere Änderungen dieser Art gab es, soweit ich weiß, noch entlang der Strecke von hier Richtung Roßbrunn (also an der St 2298) sowie entlang der Strecke von hier Richtung Zellingen (also an der St 2300).
Teilweise gab es da schon Änderungssatzdiskussionen dazu von anderen Mappern und mir und teilweise wurden auch schon Kreuzungen repariert (z.B. Kreuzung Zeller Bock - Kloster).
Frans S (2022-09-18 09:17:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126313693
user_5359 (2022-09-22 19:30:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1m76. What is the meaning of the tag do = View from path;Bing?
SomeoneElse (2022-09-22 19:39:35+00:00): Thanks - just a typo, now fixed.
user_2066394 (2022-09-18 20:10:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
user_5359 (2022-09-24 06:35:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1095497872 (one of twenty eight objects). What is the meaning of the tag Cande = Tinelli?
Rotilom (2022-09-24 06:55:01+00:00): I have removed the bogus tag. Thank you for spotting!

I have no idea how that happened. Perhaps I accidentally pasted something from my clipboard?
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 07:11:29+00:00): Why did you change the names from Arabic to Kurdish?
ڕاستی (2022-09-25 11:50:44+00:00): ناکا پێت وابیتن ئەوەش هەڵەیە. وەڵامەکی درووست و ڕێساییانە بدەوە.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126314238
ڕاستی (2022-09-25 11:52:42+00:00): لێرەدا ئەمن ناوەکانم چاک کردیتەوە، نەک تێکمدابی یان شێواندبم.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126314238
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 07:10:53+00:00): Why did you change the names from Arabic to Kurdish?
ڕاستی (2022-09-25 11:49:39+00:00): ئەو ناوچانەی بەڕێزت باسیان دەکەی زۆرینەی کوردە ئیدی ئەو هەمووە ڕکبەرییە چییە دەکەی و دەتەوێ بەزۆری بیسەپێنی
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126314317
ڕاستی (2022-09-25 11:54:25+00:00): پاشان من ناوی عارەبیم نەسڕێوەتەوە بەڵکو ناوەکەی خۆیم درووست نووسیوەتەوە، بەڕێزت کا عارەبی  و دەشزانی بە عارەبی بنووسی دەتوانی لە ژێر name:ar ناوی عارەبییەکە بنووسی.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126314317
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 07:09:45+00:00): Why did you change the name from Arabic to Kurdish?
ڕاستی (2022-09-25 11:48:34+00:00): کاکی برا ئەو گوندە ناوەکەی ناوەکی کوردییە بە چ هەقەکی دەتەوێ ناوەکەی بە عارەبی بنووسرێ، دەکرێ یەک ڕێسا و دەستوورم لۆ بهیینەیەوە کە قەدەغەی ئەوەی کردبی نابی ناوی گوندەک یان شوێنەک کە کوردی بی بە کوردی بنووسرێ.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126314359
LockOnGuy (2022-09-18 07:09:14+00:00): Why did you change the name from Arabic to Kurdish?
ڕاستی (2022-09-25 11:46:57+00:00): دەکرێ پێم بڵێی کوا عارەبی سڕایتەوە. name:ar وەکو خۆیەتی برام. ئەتوو بۆ ئەوها قەڵسی بە زیادکردنی ناوی کوردی.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126314373
JJIglesias (2022-09-18 02:28:41+00:00): Saludos.
Favor leer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary
Frans S (2022-09-28 11:03:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Unfortunately, you have mapped the shadows of buildings here. 
When you open this changeset again and switch to the Esri World Imagery (Clarity)Beta, you will see what I mean,



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126314634
charles chilufya (2022-09-28 11:14:09+00:00): noted thankyou, i think Maxar was used please validate it under maxar
Frans S (2022-09-28 11:53:45+00:00): Hi.  I wasn't validating, but reviewing changesets at random.
On Maxar I was a bit confused and could not clearly identify your mappings as buildings, so I switched to Esri which gave a better view.
The Maxar Imagery was taken under a low angle which gave long shadows which you read as buildings.  Esri shows images from a higher position, so the shadows are smaller.
Best regards
charles chilufya (2022-09-28 12:57:33+00:00): Hi,  great feedback i appreciate, but I don't think so i mapped shadow according to the imaginary i used. Please use Maxer or load my work in JOSM, not OSMCHA alone.
Thank you for you comments.
Frans S (2022-09-28 13:01:12+00:00): HI.  I review work not in OSMcha,
This is just a start. I review in JOSM.
btw This tasksquare is correct mapped.
Best regards
charles chilufya (2022-09-28 13:11:02+00:00): Thank you.
Looking forward to work together on certain task.
Regards
Charles C
mueschel (2022-10-11 10:35:33+00:00): Hi,
please check this node. The recycling tag is not one of the documented ones in the wiki:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10032519830
Frans S (2022-09-19 08:50:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key

Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126314750
Frans S (2022-09-19 08:50:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key

Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126314750
micha_k (2022-10-22 18:46:44+00:00): Hallo mabapla,
Ich habe einen Teil der Änderung rückgängig gemacht: Nach Überprüfung vor Ort führt der Fußweg eindeutig unter den Gleisen hindurch und nicht als Brücke darüber. Dazu ist der "Zutritt für unbefugte verboten", also access=private.
SekeRob (2022-09-18 19:10:24+00:00): Hi,

beside the duplicate way of bridge on top of track which I've removed, there's also the culvert tag on the stream which tag was added AFTER the bridge was mapped months before. Which is it?

Ciao,

oltre al percorso duplicato del ponte in cima al sentiero che ho rimosso, c'è anche il tag del canale sotterraneo sul flusso che è stato aggiunto DOPO che il ponte è stato mappato mesi prima. Cos'è questo?
Giovanni Forgione (2022-09-19 07:45:18+00:00): Ciao,
non capisco a cosa ti riferisci. Puoi spiegare meglio? Se si tratta della nuova ferrovia ci sono molte modifiche che riguardano i cantieri che non sono mie.

Hello,
I do not know what you're talking about. Can you explain better? When it comes to the new railway, there are a lot of changes that affect the yards that aren't mine.
SekeRob (2022-09-19 08:02:30+00:00): La combinazione di

culvert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839651898
bridge:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839651898

Molto strano
Giovanni Forgione (2022-09-19 09:01:39+00:00): Ok ora è chiaro grazie. Ho visitato il luogo che mi hai segnalato. Ma il ponte non c'è più. Lo hai già tolto. Giusto?
Giovanni Forgione (2022-09-19 09:05:53+00:00): Ho aggiornato il limite amministrativo comunale Cerreto-Guardia che coincide con il corso d'acqua Colle Pezzente e, con molta probabilità, al salvataggio OSM mi ha chiesto di aggiungere il ponte. I limiti amministrativi sono spesso approssimativi. Con il sistema dei fogli e particelle di GeoLive la precisione di aggiornamento è molto precisa.
SekeRob (2022-09-19 10:09:48+00:00): Ponte ancora lì, che ripristina il corretto attraversamento del canale sotterraneo.
Giovanni Forgione (2022-09-19 10:28:34+00:00): Adesso la situazione è cambiata di nuovo. Prima il ponte non c'era. Ora c'é di nuovo il ponte ed il corso d'acqua è stato spezzato. Non intervengo e non faccio modifiche oggi su questo ponte. Attendo di capire cosa sta succedendo. Vorrei sapere perché tanto accanimento e tanto tempo dedicato ad un singolo tratto che si può riparare in un attimo. Sappiamo bene che tutti gli utenti fanno riparazioni anche degli errori degli altri. Non ho capito perché hai impegnato 4 mail e 4 ore di tempo per comunicare che coincidevano sia il ponte che il corso a layer -1. Sinceramente non ho capito ancora questo acanimento. Mi puoi spiegare con chiarezza?
SekeRob (2022-09-19 10:48:31+00:00): Dalla tua risposta si può dedurre che non stai guardando i dati in tempo reale. Il ponte non è mai partito, è lì da diversi mesi. Di fronte al canale sotterraneo è apparso 2 settimane fa senza una ragione apparente. L'ho rimosso. Il fiume non ha interruzioni. Caso chiuso.
Giovanni Forgione (2022-09-19 10:58:28+00:00): Ti ringrazio per i caso chiuso ma a me restano alcuni dubbi. Io uso OSM in tempo reale e ad ogni tua segnalazione di stamattina sono andato a vedere il luogo che è apparso ogni volta modificato senza che io lo abbia toccato in data odierna. Mezz'ora fa il corso d'acqua era spezzato (non è difficile vederlo) ora invece è riparato. Non ho capito molto quello che è successo ma ti ringrazio per la riparazione.
NieWnen (2022-09-18 08:45:03+00:00): Do CPR/DDRiP warto dorzucać jeszcze tag segregated=yes/no (czy strefa pieszych jest oddzielona od rowerowej)
L'imaginaire (2022-09-18 12:48:22+00:00): Dag Trui,
Je had hier enkele zaken (wellicht ongewild) verwijderd, zoals de tags die we op gebouwen plaatsen om de link met het GRB te maken. Ik heb daarom jouw wijzigingenset even teruggedraad. Zo kan je terug van een 'schone lei' beginnen.

Een site relation gebruiken voor wat je wil doen, lijkt me hier niet correct, zie daarvoor de uitleg op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:site&uselang=nl 
Als Samenhuizen vzw de beheerder is van al deze projecten, dan kan je de operator tag toevoegen aan de individuele gebouwen (zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator). Als het enkel gaat om lidmaatschap van een organisatie, dan wordt het moeilijker. Zo'n lidmaatschap is ook moeilijk te verifiëren op het terrein, wat een van de basisvereisten is om iets te mappen in OpenStreetMap.

Als je wat meer info geeft, kunnen we helpen zoeken naar een oplossing.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-17 11:00:43+00:00): Hi,
may we know the source of your mapping? Furthermore: Do you know the following page? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Thanks.
mpx12 (2022-11-20 19:02:29+00:00): The source is clearly stated to be MapWithAI, I am familiar with the page you are referring to.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-21 06:26:33+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
I am not familiar MapWithAI and and your mentioned microsoft/BuildingFootprints.
This means your changeset is a data import?
adiatmad (2022-09-20 06:06:28+00:00): Hi, hope you are doing well.
Your edits look great. But, somehow you added many tags "building:yes=1" (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1095521361). Do you mind double-checking it?

Happy mapping.
user_6110846 (2023-04-09 12:37:14+00:00): какой смьісл загрязнять улицу Чкалова тегом etymology:wikidata

Чкалов ето росийский ублюдок и улицьі с его названием подлежат  переименованию 

Он скоро в январе 2024 года Крьім будет освобожден от окупации

 и улица Чкалова будет переименована на нормальное название
Littlebtc (2022-10-03 10:18:44+00:00): 您好 QQ

請注意一下 OpenStreetMap 的道路標示也需要考慮實際的通行狀況（雖然現在不實用，但你無法排除有人將站上資料用作導航或AI自駕用途），且基於實地勘查優先的方針，原則上地圖上只會渲染已經開工的路線

經查這條路線屬於初期規劃階段，因此我整線降級為 proposed 並刪除細節，地圖不會渲染，Sorry QQ

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126928233
felipeeugenio (2022-09-20 19:18:12+00:00): Estimado
Evidentemente no hay una muralla continua que pase delante de todas esas casas. Si no la gente no podría salir a la calle. Por favor mapear lo que realmente hay en terreno.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126317080
Niiepce (2022-09-18 15:28:01+00:00): Dankeschön :)
NorthCrab (2023-08-16 04:30:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10032811742
Coś tu się popsuło w okolicy
kubahahaha (2023-02-22 21:48:36+00:00): Cześć, weryfikuj dokładniej budynki - dodałeś usunięty wcześniej poprawnie dom przy ul. Majora Henryka Sucharskiego 77 w Krakowie - kasuję go.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3569805
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-14 07:19:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8490824754/history - is it intentional that you disused: prefixed properties but not the main tag ?


Is this cafe open, dead but remains present or is it fully gone?
Supaplex (2025-03-15 19:58:59+00:00): Just feel free to remove the old tag from the previous store
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-22 11:41:28+00:00): استاذ خالد هذه خريطة عامة وليست شخصية نرجوا عدم إضافة مواقع عشوائية للخريطة
eggie (2022-09-18 07:34:21+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Bedankt voor je bijdrage.
Tip.. Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. Die kun je desnoods verschuiven.
.. office=logistics wellicht?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-09-18 08:18:54+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-09-18 06:57:27+00:00): Dag maasgis..

Beter geen access=no gaan toevoegen aan paaltjes.

Je toegevoegde accesstags zijn gewoon default.
Wel soms nuttig om moped en mofa=yes toe te voegen.
Pas je het aan svp?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-09-18 08:08:04+00:00): access=no heb ik verwijderd van het paaltje.
Gr eggie
Langlaeufer (2022-09-18 08:42:48+00:00): (sidewalk=no)? Ist da nicht ein Gehweg auf der Häuserseite?
bollyboll (2022-09-18 17:44:19+00:00): Ich erinnere mich, dass ich heute Morgen vor Ort davon überzeugt war, dass es keinen Bürgersteig gibt, auch nicht auf der Häuserseite. Auf den Luftbildern sieht es in der Tat so aus, als ob es einen gäbe. Möglicherweise ist die Straße zweifarbig gepflastert, ohne Bordstein? Leider habe ich kein Foto gemacht und Erinnerungen sind bekanntlich immer trügerisch...
Langlaeufer (2022-09-18 17:46:55+00:00): Ich hab jetzt auch nur nach Luftbild geschaut. Ein Bordstein wäre aber auch nicht zwingend erforderlich für einen Gehweg.
bollyboll (2022-09-18 18:15:56+00:00): Ja, richtig. Möglicherweise habe ich heute morgen nicht genau genug geschaut, jedenfalls kommen mir beim Luftbild Zweifel.
Ich werde an der Stelle nicht noch mal vorbeikommen. Was tun? Das Tag vorerst wieder löschen?
Langlaeufer (2022-09-18 19:05:02+00:00): O.k. ich hab es erstmal wieder entfernt, und setzte ein Hinweis, dass mal jemand nachschauen soll.
bollyboll (2022-09-19 05:37:40+00:00): Sehr gut! Danke Dir!
marc__marc (2023-04-10 20:18:41+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105575385
que veux dire surface=no ?
Cordialement,
Marc
thepriben (2023-04-11 15:51:16+00:00): Salut,
Aucune idée de ce que je voulais signifier...Je l'ai enlevé. Merci de l'avoir remarqué. 
Je le note pour y repasser un jour prochain et voir à quoi ça ressemble.
Bonne journée, B.
Warin61 (2022-09-19 23:04:54+00:00): Hi,

There has been some dragging of  at least 2 nodes by this changeset... 

node 7429152706 dragged south east, makes build way cross it self
node 6682975699 dragged north west, makes a badly mapped tree cross itself. The badly mapped tree has been done by a mapper in 2019 and they only have some 20 edits...

Bit mystified as to why...  looks like the nodes were changed without realizing they were 'inuse'??? 

I have left them alone so you can view them ... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.10137&lat=-37.77889&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Diacritic (2022-09-19 23:35:19+00:00): Hi Warin,

Thanks for the pickup, not sure what happened there.

I've fixed the crossing ways and improved the trees.
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-19 18:17:56+00:00): Hallo Adlatus1977,

der Name wird ohne Bindestrich geschrieben. Kannst Du das bitte noch korrigieren?

Ich persönlich würde noch short_name=Kruse ergänzen. Das ist der geläufige 
Name.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-19 18:23:03+00:00): P.S.: Und willkommen bei OSM!

Grundsätzlich noch der Hinweis, dass das Kopieren von anderen Webseiten kritisch ist. OSM zeichnet sich vor allem durch vor Ort überprüfte Daten aus. Auf solchen Webseiten können auch Fehler enthalten sein, die wir nicht nach OSM kopieren wollen. Außerdem gibt es immer das Thema Copyright.
Adlatus1977 (2022-09-20 12:52:30+00:00): Hallo Roger!

Vielen Dank für die Hinweise. Der Name wird tatsächlich ohne Bindestrich geschrieben. Hatte es wegen der vermeintlich besseren Darstellung eingefügt. Werde ich aber ändern. Würde jedoch gerne den Namen ansich beibehalten wollen, da es sich hier um den vollständigen und offiziell korrekten Namen der Firma handelt (allerdings ohne "Gmbh und Co. KG"). Allein "Kruse" ist nicht so unbedingt geläufig. Manche kennen es auch nur unter Lecker Bäcker.

Ich hatte oft nur "Kruse" in der Karte gelesen und finde, dass das zu kurz ist. Wenn der Name, den ich geschrieben hatte, jedoch zu lang erscheint, würde ich zumindest "Bäckerei Kruse" verwenden wollen.

Die Öffnungszeiten sind auf dem aktuellen Stand. Die Zeiten die ich im OpenStreet gesehen habe (teilweise bis 20 Uhr) gibt es schon lange nicht mehr. Ich bin in dieser Firma angestellt 😉. Aber das Einpflegen der Filialdaten habe ich privat und ohne Auftag gemacht, da ich eigentlich nur die Ortsbestimmung der Filialen fürs Wandern mit Komoot brauche. Nicht alle Waren aufgeführt und bei der Gelegenheit habe ich dann auch Korrekturen gemacht. 😉