piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2017-02-13 04:19:56+00:00): Ook zag ik nog 2 dingetjes waardoor het niet kan routeren op een routeplanner.
Inmiddels acces no van deze situatie afgehaald.

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46035651
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46035651
weerridder (2017-02-13 13:51:31+00:00): Hallo Commodoortje,

Bedankt voor de terugkoppeling (de eerste keer dat ik een reactie kreeg via OSM)!

Ik ben inderdaad een beginner met OSM, en JOSM heeft nog wel wat geheimen voor me.

Als ik je opmerkingen goed begrijp en de informatie in het History vensters van ways 6662551 en 474276402 juist interpreteer, dan heb je het tunneltje terecht een stukje ingekort (in de versie van voor de uitbreiding van AH liep -voor zover ik me kan herinneren- het tunneltje op OSM ook -ten onrechte- door tot de Denekamperstraat).

Nog iets, je hebt terecht access=no verwijderd van hekje 3368828154, maar het valt me op dat way 6662623 (het stukje na de tunnel ten noorden van de rondweg) nog steeds access=no heeft staan. 
Moeten trouwens bij hekje 3368828154 niet de tags foot=yes en bicycle=yes worden gezet?
(omdat ik niet helemaal zeker ben van de correcte labeling heb ik nog niks veranderd)

Met vriendelijke groet,
René de Ridder (weerridder)
Commodoortje (2017-02-13 16:59:25+00:00): Als je JOSM vragen hebt mag je deze altijd stellen op het forum. Er is een topic wat de eerste stappen van JOSM laat zien.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
Op je andere vragen kom ik terug.
Commodoortje (2017-02-13 17:02:27+00:00): Er zijn sinds vorige week actuele  (2016) satellietbeelden beschikbaar gesteld. Dit maakt het mappen nog leuker.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57298
Commodoortje (2017-02-14 15:48:07+00:00): Je had helemaal gelijk. Het stukje weg waar de barrier op stond was nog voorzien met acces=no
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xp5iwjgc8fuqb5c/2017-02-13_18-16-26.jpg?raw=1
.
Vermoedelijk heeft ijsb deze route op 'slot' gezet omdat het vrij lang afgesloten is geweest.
Ik had meerdere segmenten ontdaan van deze acces=no toevoeging.
(het is overigens niet gebruikelijk om tijdelijke afsluitingen in OSM te taggen, dit om gebruikers van navigatie apparatuur te behoeden voor afsluitingen die er niet meer zijn)

foot=yes en bicycle=yes zijn niet nodig, in onderstaande link kun je lezen waarom niet.
Alle highway=* hebben standaard al toegangsbeperkingen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
weerridder (2017-02-15 19:48:56+00:00): Nogmaals dank voor de reacties! De nieuwe luchtfoto's zijn echt een aanwinst.

Ik begrijp dat ik voor een highway=cycleway geen verdere access=... labels hoef te zetten. Mijn vraag ging echter over de barrier=gate (3368828154), waarbij geen enkel access=... is ingevuld. Kan dit geen routeringsproblemen gaan opleveren?

Ik kan daar op de wiki niets over vinden.
Commodoortje (2017-02-15 22:03:22+00:00): Als je in Josm op de barrier node selecteert, kun je via de eigenschappen aan de rechterzijde de elke key selecteren om zo via rechtermuisknop naar de wiki pagina te surfen.
Bijvoorbeeld:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
Polarbear (2017-02-13 10:40:09+00:00): Further, objects on which CS46018768 just removed leading/trailing spaces in values were not reverted by the JOSM plugin. This explains the difference between the way/node numbers between CS46018768 and this one.
unsungNovelty (2017-02-21 06:22:38+00:00): Hi Fonchy,
Greeting on behalf of the OpenStreetMap community. I have come accross this changeset where you have deleted a lot of buildings. It looks like you have deleted buildings which was not traced properly. Is that the reason? It would be great if you could confirm the reason for this deletion.

Regards,
Nikhil
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-02-13 01:07:36+00:00): voce criou dois elementos, um ponto e uma area pra identificar o shopping. o certo é só um.
nammala (2017-02-21 05:22:15+00:00): Hi  Fonchy,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Noticed that you have been some buildings and also some buildings with `area=yes` tag . May I know the reason behind doing this. I also observed one user who is doing this kind of mapping activity like giving `area=yes` to buildings : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/julio%20osorio/history#map=17/10.98592/-74.80702. 

Regards,
nammala
maxolasersquad (2017-02-14 16:32:48+00:00): The Publix at this location is already on the map.
jm delgado (2020-06-05 13:00:56+00:00): O facto de não ter o valor "reservoir" é propositado ou foi esquecimento? O valor "water" é na minha opinião demasiado ambíguo para esta região.
Cicero Costa (2020-06-05 14:25:14+00:00): Bom dia, o ideal para o valor "water" para esta região é que seja realmente especificado "reservoir" pois mesmo sendo reservatórios, podem secar durante ausências de invernos ... realmente fica ambíguo... entendo que seja válido representar como água para qualquer fim... será que existe um openstreetmap que mude conforme o clima? seria o máximo....entendo que seria positivo indicar que num determinado lugar há "acúmulo de agua" mesmo ambíguo, pois serve como referência de área.... e as lagoas? encharcadas?  podem ficar ambíguas, tambem ....abs
jm delgado (2020-06-06 19:09:15+00:00): Estimado Cícero: uma solução para a intermitência dos açudes poderia ser a chave "intermittent", tal como sugerido em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent

Obrigado pelas contribuições!

Zé Miguel
5m4u9 (2017-02-13 04:01:49+00:00): el landuse es para urbanizaciones o condominios, yo pondría building pero solo a las construcciones no a todo el terreno.

todavía estamos en debate si es oportuno añadir al mapa las parcelas de terreno.
seudodata (2017-02-13 14:49:28+00:00): Área de terreno dedicada predominantemente a edificios de tipo residencial, como casas individuales o edificios de apartamentos.
seudodata (2017-02-13 14:52:26+00:00): La descripción que pone aquí no dice eso: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Por otro lado cómo delimitas una propiedad de otra? Los edificios construidos dentro de las propiedades no necesariamente van a ocupar todo el terreno.
5m4u9 (2017-02-13 15:46:39+00:00): cierto, landuse es cómo destinamos el terreno para su uso, en este caso es algo redundante poner a cada terreno, porque ya conocemos el área urbana (lo que llaman mancha urbana), pero si es necesario para parques o para areas industriales, militares,serían como la excepción.

decía de poner a urbanizaciones o condominios porque son casos especiales de uso de suelo, quiza haya otras pero esas conozco por ahora.

la delimitación de la propiedad sería a traves de sus paredes dibujando un área, justo como el de tu condominio, sería un área que en su borde tiene paredes (barrier=wall) o quizá verjas en su frente (barrier=fence). 

cada edificio debería tener un area building con su tipo. a veces se podría confundir edificio con solo techado (building=roof). de ahí que hay que ser finos en determinar si es edificio de apartamentos, oficinas, universidad, escuelas, hospitales, servicio, industriales, o solo tejados, etc.

da para largo, me gustaría tener idea como tienen esta info los de catastro, en españa que tienen taan organizado tienen unos errores y malos datos que desanima querer usarlos por lo mal hecho. cómo estará en bolivia?
5m4u9 (2017-02-13 15:48:30+00:00): con una inmobiliaria hicimos el experimento de mapear los terrenos que ofrecian, acá el resultado. falta mucho.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/-17.37467/-66.18194
5m4u9 (2017-02-13 15:50:35+00:00): este es otro ejercicio usando y dibujando las manzanas y con aceras y números de casas (interpolados)... me gusta esto, estoy replicando en otros lugares.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-17.39160/-66.14611
5m4u9 (2017-02-13 15:53:27+00:00): en este ultimo caso, es menos invasivo y más limpio visualmente, la otra vez me preguntaba... cual sería el motivo para añadir lotes? desde el punto de vista funcional no añade nada de valor... mas que estadisticas de pedaceo del area urbana.
aharvey (2017-02-14 23:19:53+00:00): I reverted this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46092581 as I'm pretty sure this is a fictional park.
bmagnier (2017-02-13 01:14:01+00:00): Sidewalk added - papaya tree previously added along sidewalk.
Robert Whittaker (2017-02-14 12:29:16+00:00): In this changeset, you appear to have added lots of useful address information to the houses. However, many of the addr:postcode values on the buildings have been set to the literal text "<different>", e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219288498/history . I assume this was not intentional and it might be the result of a bug in the editing software you used.

A map showing all the objects with addr:postcode=<different> (including ones outside the UK) can be found at https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22addr%3Apostcode%22%3D%22%3Cdifferent%3E%22+global&R .

I don't suppose you know any of the actual postcodes for the houses in the area of your changeset and so can fix them? (Be careful not to use any copyrighted datasets for this though.)
Deanna Earley (2017-02-14 13:36:00+00:00): Hah, thanks for noticing!
I blame JOSM and I'll fix it up tonight!
Deanna Earley (2017-02-14 13:37:13+00:00): I do a walking survey so can only collect House numbers.
Post code are added where I know them (I.e. Shop Contact details) but that doesn't apply to residential houses.
jfd553 (2023-03-30 19:38:50+00:00): Node: 4682668107
Tags: 
    "name"="Khartoum"
    "place"="locality"
lat, lon: 45.3633649, -72.3035839

LOL, vraiment?
Martin868 (2023-03-30 19:42:21+00:00): Qu'est-ce qui est drôle, le nom du lieu. C est vraiment son nom et il est identifié sur les cartes. En plus le chemin qui y mène morte ce nom.
jfd553 (2023-03-30 19:50:33+00:00): C'est drôle de voir un endroit isolé, en plein milieu des sablières, porter le nom de la capitale du Soudan ! Je n'avais pas remarqué le nom du chemin qui passe par là. Le commentaire se voulait amical.
Martin868 (2023-03-30 19:54:18+00:00): Pas de souci. C est en effet un nom un peu surprenant. Il y a de nombreux lieux-dit en Estrie. A cet endroit il y a deja eu un chemin de fer et des mines à une autre époque.
ezgis76 (2017-02-21 22:24:29+00:00): Great timing.  Thank you!!!
mvexel (2017-02-15 17:02:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check out our local mapper group, OSM Utah, at https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Utah/ 
Happy Mapping!
DUGA (2021-02-20 18:55:40+00:00): This stop sign does not stop left turn vehicles. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4682714929
Supaplex (2017-03-02 17:31:25+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
ridixcr (2017-02-16 15:52:44+00:00): Hey, minseo! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
mavl (2017-02-13 16:56:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок получился довольно разрушительным. Вы удалили светофор и пешеходный переход:  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=46036958  
В результате этого проезд [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473260282] стал короче. Раньше он доходил до Одесской улицы, а после изменений он стал доходить только до тротуара. Навигация с этого проезда на Одесскую улицу (и обратно) стало невозможной.  
Ошибка заключается в том, что вы удалили ТОЧКИ светофора и пешеходного перехода. В результате пропала часть линии проезда. Также из-за удаления точки изменилась геометрия улицы Одесской и она стала прямее.  
Если в будущем вам будет нужно удалить светофор (или подобный объект на какой-либо линии), то удаляйте ТЕГИ этой точки, но не саму ТОЧКУ.  
Я вернул удалённые точки на прежние места:  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=46052705
pesec (2017-02-14 06:42:31+00:00): Спасибо. Я этот момент, к своему стыду, не заметил.
mavl (2017-10-11 17:55:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52832407 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45913747].
mavl (2017-10-11 17:55:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52832407 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45913747].
mavl (2017-10-11 17:55:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52832407 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45913747].
mvexel (2017-02-15 17:01:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check out our local mapper group, OSM Utah, at https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Utah/ 
Happy Mapping!
manoharuss (2017-02-13 07:17:46+00:00): Hi Павел Изотов,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is appreciated. Are you sure this cross is an attraction?

see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction

Best,

Manohar
Supaplex (2017-03-02 17:31:56+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
nammala (2017-02-14 06:06:28+00:00): Hi orangelemonjelly,

May I know the reason behind changing the place tag from town to village for the node -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/415158163/history. 

Regards,
nammala
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
manoharuss (2017-02-13 07:34:28+00:00): Hi felixi,

You gave number as a value for name tag. It would be great if you can correct this.

Thank you.

Best,

Manohar
manoharuss (2017-02-21 07:07:53+00:00): Fixed!
manoharuss (2017-02-13 07:41:07+00:00): Hi LorisO,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your interest in contributing to OSM is highly appreciated. But I have observed that for this campsite you have a given a name in name:fr tag and a description in name tag. Can you change it actuall name in name tag as well. You can add description in description=* tag.

Best,

Manohar
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
Datin (2017-02-14 06:55:08+00:00): Jak toto souvisí s určeným source? Nižná a Podbiel jsou trochu jinde :-)
Ivan Dostál (2017-02-14 07:08:26+00:00): Děkuji za upozornění. Zadával jsem více omezení a nezměnil zdroj. Ještě jednou díky.
ridixcr (2017-02-16 15:52:18+00:00): Hey, oruk09! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
ridixcr (2017-02-16 15:53:43+00:00): Hey, oruk09! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
literan (2017-02-13 11:40:49+00:00): непохоже, что там свежая вырубка (landuse=logging): на довольно старых снимках уже видна поляна. Заменил на natural=grassland (травянистая растительность) и включил в мультиполигон леса в качестве inner (потому что это "дырка" в лесу)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
tux67 (2017-02-13 09:10:23+00:00): Hallo Petrausch,

wollkommen bei OSM und danke daß du hilfst die Daten zu verbessern.
Das von die eingetragene Objekt hat zur Zeit nur einen "name" Tag, was in OSM nicht ausreichned zur Beschreibung eines Objekts ist.
Ich vermute, daß das Studienzentrum ein Bereich der Universität ist.
Dann solltest du hier Hinweise finden, welche sinnvollen Attribute noch zu dem Eintrag gehören:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Duniversity
Zumindest amenity=university, building=university und  description="Studienzentrum für Sehgeschädigte (SZS)" würden für mich Sinn machen.

Gute allgemeine Informationen findest Du z. B. unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Gruß und viel Spass beim Mappen
Stephan (tux67)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
Dino Michelini (2017-10-16 08:55:46+00:00): Ciao, perdona la domanda ma quanti sentieri/strade sterrate esistono ed hai mappato nella zona con name=Senteri di Sant'Orfeo? Ne ho contati 8. Mi sembra che utilizzare come name di una singola entità il nome di una rete di sentieri sia improprio perchè confonde le idee alle persone ed ai navigatori. Il name di un sentiero/strada è sempre singolo, come ad es. il nome delle strade con i numeri civici nei centri abitati. Se non si conosce il nome di ogni singolo sentiero sarebbe meglio non mettere nulla.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-13 18:29:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46056517 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some politically motivated edits in the region of Nagorno-Karabakh (and a Japanese sushi restaurant)
kreuzschnabel (2018-09-16 08:20:56+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank fürs Eintragen der Gebäude und Firmen. Wenn allerdings ein Gebäude als Umriss erfasst ist (was natürlich viel besser ist als nur ein Punkt), dann ist es wenig sinnvoll, einen Punkt für eine Firma darin nochmals building=yes zu taggen – das wäre ja ein Gebäude im Gebäude. Wenn nicht bekannt ist, was für eine Firma das ist, dann schreib office=company + name=* dran. Könntest du die building-Tags an den Punkten wieder rausnehmen?
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-01 00:03:46+00:00): Encouraged but not required?  Uuh, dude... seriously?  ORS 814.400 Vehicle Code Applicable To Bicycles, and ORS 811.320 Failure to Drive on Right of Divided Highway.

On the Oregon side, yeah, both cycleways on the Interstate Bridge are one way.

On the Washington end:  RCW 46.61.100, Keep right except when passing, etc. and RCW 46.61.755, bicycles responsible as vehicles.

There's no dispute on this, these are 100%, one-ways, the east cycleway is northbound only, the west one is southbound only, by state law, in both states.
Commodoortje (2017-02-13 14:24:40+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleren middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-02-13 15:06:01+00:00): De aanvulling die u heeft toegevoegd was reeds aanwezig in de OSM database.
Ik heb daarom je changeset teruggezet.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2834497787
.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice#E.C3.A9n_object.2C_.C3.A9.C3.A9n_OSM-element
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2834
dgitto (2017-02-13 18:16:18+00:00): Ciao, il municipio l'avevo già piazzato (via provinciale). è davvero là invece?
Commodoortje (2017-02-13 16:19:45+00:00): Ik heb een paar kleine aanpassingen verricht aan de jachthaven.
o.a. een steiger aangebracht.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dmarina
Chris Fleming (2017-02-24 12:44:00+00:00): Hi I just wanted to welcome you to OpenStreetMap - I've been trying to find a way of validating this edit - But I just wanted to check how you know there is a pond here.

As it's very unusual to see ponds in tenement gardens?

Let me know if you have any questions.
tepm (2017-02-27 09:45:24+00:00): Hi Chris! 

Sorry for the delay in my reply and thank you for the welcome. Ponds are pretty rare but my neighbour has been building one for a while (poorly!) and I thought it might be nice to add it for some local colour! I must confess I am not 100% if I marked the right bit, the google pics didn't show it very well (I am not sure how up to date they are) and so I picked what looked a bit like the liner he had, although he since has swapped that out anyway! 

Apologies if this was wrong, I have just discovered the site and thought it'd be fun to add a small point that not many folk would know about. Honestly I like bird watching and ponds etc are useful to know about for that (not that you want bird watchers tramping through your tenement I suppose!). 

Let me know if I should delete this until it shows up 100% on google maps - sorry for the trouble. 

Cheers! 

Tom

P.S. this is very addicting, I spent a while this weekend going out specifically for a walk in an area not too well mapped in the hope I could add some detail :-)