piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2018-10-20 10:25:34+00:00): Hello Saikat Maiti,
I'm trying to track down the organiser of a mapathon which resulted in lots of changesets with the hashtags "#hotosm-project-101 #valectus #mapathon #highway" on 5th October.  As you've used these hashtags here I wondered if you may know?  I see that you're listed as the creator of http://tasks.openstreetmap.in/project/101 so I wondered if this might be related?  I'm from the Data Working Group - we've got involved because someone has reported problems with the mapping of some of these new user changes (specifically https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63221736 , and for the avoidance of doubt I've made it very clear to the author of the first changeset discussion comment on there that is was NOT an appropriate changeset discussion comment to send to a new OSM user).
What we'd like to do is to explain to the organiser of this mapathon how to do things better next time (for example, suggest to users that they use good changeset comments, not just hashtags that will be meaningless to most mappers).  If you know who that is, it'd be great if you could let us know.  You can either comment here or email the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Ryzen (2018-11-02 21:21:07+00:00): Hi Andy, your effort seems to be futile. Company mappers map and then go.
SomeoneElse (2018-11-02 22:56:49+00:00): @Ryzen maybe sometimes, but we were able to get in touch with the organiser of this particular mapathon and explain things :)
Saikat Maiti (2018-11-03 03:47:41+00:00): @Ryzen First of all, I am not a paid mapper till now, what I contribute to OSM, completely with my personal interest and i love to do that. I helped others to organize mapathon freely and try to encourage map. I assured the Data working group that i will visit all the tasks done on the mapathon day because i care about OpenStreetMap data and it's uses.
eggie (2018-10-05 10:02:01+00:00): (review).. Oke.. alleen ontbreekt nu de highway= path of evt. footway tag. 
Formeel is iets een footway als er een blauw rond bord staat. In andere gevallen eigenlijk path. Ook heeft de way geen verbinding met de Speenkruidstraat zo te zien. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63220800
eggie (2018-10-05 10:18:22+00:00): highway tag path toegevoegd en verbinding met rijbaan gemaakt.
Het zal niet spontaan routeren in routeplanners,
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:46:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Hjart (2018-10-05 09:13:56+00:00): Har den et navn/beskrivelse?
Jesper Blinoff (2018-10-05 09:20:07+00:00): Den er opdateret med info nu :-)
Hjart (2018-10-05 09:51:18+00:00): Super :-)
nplath (2018-10-18 22:46:40+00:00): Reverted because of bullshit roads in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63662065
SomeoneElse (2018-10-20 10:36:03+00:00): Hello Rachna05 and welcome to OpenStreetMap.  My apologies for the comment above from nplath.  I've already explained to them that it was an extremely unhelpful comment - people who've just started mapping in OpenStreetMap need explanations of what the problems are and help about how to fix them, not abuse.  In this case the problem seems to be with a residential road that you can see in https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63221736/ - it looks like it has been drawn in error.  
What I'd expect the organisers of the mapathon that you attended to have done was to explain a little more about how to edit things in OpenStreetMap, including what to do when things go wrong.  In order to help them to do this next time it'd be great to know who them were - do you know?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
PS: If you've got any other OSM questions, please don't hesitate to ask.  You can comment back in this changeset or you can mail the Data Working Group via data@osmfoundation.org.
GOwin (2018-12-24 12:51:38+00:00): Major offset difference could've been corrected.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63222048
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:46:00+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
luiswoo (2018-10-05 17:18:34+00:00): просто название не достаточно, хештег — бесполезно https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dshooting
aharvey (2018-10-06 01:31:04+00:00): Actually the road name someone had surveyed was correct for the northern part. I've fixed this up.
Misa_zumba (2018-10-06 19:05:43+00:00): Thank you aharvey.
Hjart (2018-10-05 09:24:49+00:00): Det var hurtigt :-)
Reclus (2018-10-05 14:39:23+00:00): Hallo!

Warum in aller Welt hast du einen Teil der Gerichtsstraße gelöscht? Selbst falls dieser Teil zur Zeit gesperrt sein sollte, sollte er auf keinen Fall gelöscht werden, da er ja in der Realität existiert.

Bitte achte mehr auf das, was du machst, vor dem Hochladen! In Witten sind viele Daten sehr genau eingetragen. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass du als Anfänger Daten zerstörst, ist sehr hoch. Ich kann nur dazu raten, in anderen Orten erste Schritte zu machen und in Witten evtl. Fehler als Notiz auf openstreetmap.org einzutragen und nicht selbst zu versuchen, es zu korrigieren.

Es ist wichtig, dass Wege verbunden sind, um ein Routing zu ermöglichen. Du solltest daher auf keinen Fall auch wie im Fall des Wegs des Amtsgerichts Verbindungen zwischen Wegen löschen, obwohl sie in der Realität da sind.

Bürgersteige können sowohl als sidewalk-Tag als auch Fußwege (highway=footway) eingetragen werden. In letzterem Fall sollte (footway=sidewalk) ergänzt werden. Bitte nichts entsprechendes löschen!
Reclus (2018-10-05 14:43:09+00:00): Und du hast die Plattform einer Haltestelle gelöscht!
Ronny Standtke (2019-06-17 13:11:10+00:00): I reverted this change as there is no maxspeed=none in Switzerland!
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed for details. Most importantly: "Die Angabe kann und soll auch in jenen Fällen erfolgen, in denen das Limit nicht explizit angegeben ist (z.B. durch Schilder), sondern implizit durch allgemeine Verkehrsregeln."
Nakaner (2018-10-29 09:09:25+00:00): Hi,

why did you change the oneway=* tag from "yes" to "no" that has been added by your workmate a few days before?

Best regards

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63223664
gseethar (2018-10-29 12:28:30+00:00): Hi Michael,

The edit made by @soumybha did not have any evidence and was caught in our review process and hence was reverted by @changurl.
Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.
Regards,
Ganesh
ToniE (2018-10-05 09:21:53+00:00): ... im TIP: Parkplätze/Gebäude entfallen wg. Baustelle, Weitere Details
literan (2018-10-05 15:28:10+00:00): не надо рисовать дублирующие парки поверх существующих. Также, дворовые территории не являются парками в OSM. Все правки откачены
frosm (2018-10-07 22:36:42+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai fait un revert partiel car la géométrie d'une route était visiblement involontairement fantaisiste
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63291408
peut-être était ce du au fait de ne pas avoir chargé la zone au complet avant de modifier des nœuds utilisé par + d'un objet.
cordialement
Adrien G (2018-10-08 05:15:38+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez bien fait, mes changements ne concernent pas cette rue, il s'agit donc d'une erreur de ma part.

Toutes mes excuses,

Bonne journée
Adrien
Greeshmag (2018-11-22 12:39:17+00:00): Hi Rachna05,
I didn't find any road in this path. can you please explain the reason?
Alecs01 (2018-10-07 13:16:37+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto in OpenStreetMap, la chiesa esisteva già: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465447513 ho cancellato il doppione
Sanniu (2020-02-16 07:45:11+00:00): Is there a pedestrian path from the street to the 424, or the pass is completely blocked?
DoK (2020-02-19 17:29:06+00:00): Closed with a permamnet fence.
No pedestrain path around but one can alaways jump across :-)
Sanniu (2020-02-24 13:26:16+00:00): OK, thanks, will mark it as noexit
alester (2018-10-05 18:23:28+00:00): I can't say that I understand why a bunch of additional nodes were added to a straight line, but I guess they aren't harming anything. FYI, though, that there isn't such a thing as "too long of a segment". Some tools may highlight these in case they indicate a problem, but legitimately long ways (like in the case of borders, rivers, etc.) are just fine.
CarniLvr79 (2018-10-06 05:11:05+00:00): Thank you for checking my work, I appreciate the back up. Let me explain.

I use the program at: 
tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/

I believe there is a good reason why it is bad to have a segment >= 20 km. In fact the wiki page says to cut segments down to 15 km. Honestly, I am not 100% sure as to why the programmers have made this a/the limit to initialize an error. I have had discussions with other mappers when I have made similar corrections. 

First, the error program tells me it needs dividing and my OCD appreciates an error free space around my locale/state. 

Second, In order to be able to easily handle long roads/ways/lines, you should not make one long one out of it. You should rather split it into several ways. As a rule of thumb, no way should be longer than 10-15 km. Typically, they should actually be much shorter.

Applications like route planners for example will be able to easily re-join the ways to one road again. This type of application will need to postprocess the OSM data anyway. And it makes for easier editing in the future.

But for motorways for example, it makes sense to make a way from one exit to the next. Also, intersections of motorways should be the point where you split a road into ways.

I suggest you try editing it for yourself, it really is a pain. Zoom into one of these supremely long segments and try and select it. You can't select it at all! Unless you select it at the closest node. Which is at the end/beginning of the line. As a person who takes a significant amount of pride in the editing I make to the map in the cities around me, I appreciate taking a little more time and not rushing through just to slap something down. Boom-big-line, boom-next-big line, boom-two-nodes. Next move it move it. No. See, I believe in doing things to the best of ones ability the first time and it won't have to be done again in the future.

That sea line or whatever it was; was close to 32 km long with only two nodes. That's silly, man! Unless you can convince me otherwise.
alester (2018-10-07 15:50:47+00:00): Thanks for explaining.
As far as things reported by OSMI, I'd like to point out that it isn't an "error program". It's one of many quality assurance tools that highlights "potential" issues. Not everything reported by these tools is necessarily a problem. Sometimes there are edge cases where it actually makes sense to map something in a way that a QA tool reports as an issue. Please don't try to "fix" everything reported by OSMI.
As for the way length, keep in mind that it's a rule-of-thumb, not a hard rule (or the database would enforce it during uploads). If you have issues selecting things in iD, I'd suggest that you start using the more-advanced JOSM editor. It's far better for making more complex edits. As for selecting long ways, it's simply something that you need to get used to; when you're trying to work on a long way, you may need to download data near an end/bend node.
Having a two-node way in this case isn't a case of sloppy work. This way can be represented fully by two nodes, so there simply isn't any need to add superfluous nodes. Whenever possible, you should try to minimize the number of objects you use to represent an object, because otherwise it bloats the size of the database, making it harder to work with for data consumers. For example, while a curving road could very accurately be represented by thousands of nodes very close together, it's overkill and unnecessarily creates extra data that consumers would need to process. In the case of this seamark way, two nodes is all that's needed to represent the straight call-in point line. The extra nodes really don't serve any purpose. Sorry, but what I find silly is using 13 nodes to represent a single straight-line feature.
CarniLvr79 (2018-10-07 19:07:57+00:00): You said, "(or the database would enforce it during uploads)." I am not sure I can agree with you at all with this thought. Here is why: double nodes and self intersecting lines. I do not know how the double nodes thing happens because occasionally I will see edits I have made pop up here and I am meticulous on making sure I don't do this. And yet, it gets uploaded. And self intersecting lines is a newbie error, for sure, and yet those also are allowed in uploads. I do like the thought you have (or the database would enforce it during uploads), which I had that exact same thought. But, I cannot personally continue thinking this when it comes to the ongoing scenarios I explained.

As for fixing everything OSMI reports, it would seem I have been running into a significant problem with doing this, but it is not what you may think. The problem is when I make an edit in an area of someone's work, it would seem, almost without hesitation, the editor contacts me frustrated with such an intrusion; when, honestly, if all else fails, it is really not that big of a deal and only the editor's pride has been injured. I am not referring to you, btw!!!

As for 13 nodes??? I have no clue who put the other nodes in there but I only added 3 to divide it into 4 ways. There is  a bit of a lag time between map uploads so perhaps someone else added some. 

I fully appreciate your belief that 13 nodes for a single straight line being silly. But, you should appreciate the fact that this single line is around 32 kilometers long and even 13 nodes (which I did not do but did contribute) for such a distance is nothing to be concerned about for bloating any database. I feel you are exaggerating your point in order to make it more effective when that is unnecessary. 

As for rivers, here is where you should be confronting the editors and not me who divides a 2000+ noded way section into 2 smaller ones. I personally could do the same river or natural boundary, etc with 1/10th the nodes. And from the articles I read, it is preferred to have more than one way because the programs which process the data, to them it is nothing of an issue. But the issue I personally could deduce is on the editing side with only the editors. And here is where I personally find rest on this issue is with this, that it is an open source. Even though when I scroll over a city to get ideas from other people, I see something what I would never do. I let it go because of multiple yet reasonable reasons such as it is not my work, it is truly not that big of a deal, and if someone wants to put water slides in with layering issues, then good for them - not my thing, but yay someone made some edits. Perhaps someone else will come along and fix it. My OCD will let these water slides go... (not an easy thing for me to do), but it takes my time to go back over someone else's work. Not to mention it is exhausting.
nevw (2018-10-05 14:10:08+00:00): Hi sijia pei
the entire area you have mapped appears to be fictitious. The OSM is only for things that exist in the real world. Do you wish me to revert your edit to return the map to it's correct state?
There are other places where you can draw artistic maps such as opengeofiction.net
Hjart (2018-10-05 10:31:29+00:00): Er stien langs Kirkeltevej en separat dobbeltrettet sti?
Tntdruid (2018-10-05 10:40:26+00:00): Den er ca 60 cm fra Kirkeltevej, de har ikke lavet vejstriber i nu.
Hjart (2018-10-05 13:28:05+00:00): Det er meningen den skal være dobbeltrettet?. Jeg spørger fordi det er normal kutyme i OSM at tegne dobbeltrettede cykelstier som separate veje i stil med hvordan de ellers er lavet i området her. Sådan som du har lavet kan man heller ikke se i vores data at den er dobbeltrettet.
Tntdruid (2018-10-05 13:30:22+00:00): Jeg retter det når de er færdig med den.
Hjart (2018-10-05 13:51:40+00:00): Er det iøvrigt muligt at du kan lave Mapillary sekvenser i stil med https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Iq_ZCTv979LgYFBhQPTCvg , så vi andre har mulighed for at se hvordan der ser ud nu?
osmviborg (2018-10-05 13:55:54+00:00): Allerød kommune. "I perioden ultimo august-november anlægges ny cykelsti på Kirkeltevej fra nr. 18, hvor den eksisterende sti ender, til Frederiksborgvej. Stien anlægges som dobbeltrettet cykelsti i den sydlige side af vejen".
GerdP (2018-10-08 09:18:04+00:00): Hi! Please watch out for typo highway=residencial instead of residential
like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630627607
I found 12 ways with this wrong value in Sangarédi, probably your JOSM editor remembered the wrong value and uses it for autocompletion.
keujfl839237 (2018-10-28 14:45:08+00:00): Hallo!

Die folgenden beiden Trampelpfade, die du eingezeichnet hast, befinden sich in einem Naturschutzgebiet, in dem es nicht erlaubt ist, die offiziellen Wege zu verlassen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630930713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630930711

Ich habe sie deswegen mit access=no und unofficial=yes markiert. Allerdings frage ich mich, ob es nicht besser wäre, die Pfade zu löschen.

Gruss
bschaffner (2018-10-28 17:12:34+00:00): Hallo
Die beiden Pfade sind zwar nicht sehr begangen, aber gem. meiner Einschätzung alte Wege/Pfade, die durch neue Verläufe ersetzt wurden. Beide sind aber immer noch klar und deutlich sichtbar und begangen. Ich kann auch kein Naturschutzgebiet ausfindig machen. Das Waldnaturinventar "Drakau" befindet sich in der Nähe, aber beide Pfade sind deutlich ausserhalb. Um welches Naturschutzgebiet soll es sich denn handeln?
bschaffner (2018-10-28 17:19:38+00:00): Hallo
Ich habe weiter recherchiert. Die Wege liegen tatsächlich im Bundes-Waldreservat "Aareufer Bremgartenwald". Laut map.geo.admin.ch ist hat es den Typ 1.2. Es besteht damit kein Wegegebot. Oder hast du andere Informationen?
Merci & Gruss
keujfl839237 (2018-10-28 17:32:37+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort!

Es handelt sich um das Totalreservat "Aareufer Bremgartenwald". Ich habe es heute anhand der Schilder vor Ort eingetragen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8858654

(Gemäss Swisstopo und einer Karte auf einem der Schilder ist der offizielle Perimeter sogar noch etwas grösser; allerdings dürfen wir diese Quellen bekanntlich nicht verwenden.)

Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass es die beiden Pfade noch vor ein paar Jahren nicht gab.
keujfl839237 (2018-10-28 18:09:58+00:00): Ja, auf den Tafeln steht "Wege nicht verlassen" oder so ähnlich. (Sorry, habe deine zweite Nachricht erst jetzt gesehen.)
bschaffner (2018-10-28 20:57:16+00:00): Danke für deine Antworten! Der westlichere Weg bei der Halenbrücke ist auf dem (veralteten) Übersichtsplan des Kantons Bern eingezeichnet (vgl. z.B. Karte des Reservats unter https://www.wald-tagg.ch/download/pictures/39/h5lp4jdkjdoauyo09ax8b5dqutxutk/karte.pdf). Auch der östlichere Weg bestand schon ewig, war aber vor einigen Jahren noch weniger begangen als heute. Da die Wege bestehen, aber im Waldreservat liegen, finde ich die aktuelle Erfassung mit den entsprechenden Parametern passend. 

Wo stehen eigentlich die Infotafeln?

Danke nochmals für das Feedback & Gruss
keujfl839237 (2018-10-28 21:48:32+00:00): Dann habe ich mich wohl schlecht geachtet. Sorry!

Wenn die Trampelpfade schon vor dem Naturreservat existierten, ist es mir nun allerdings unklar, ob es erlaubt ist diese zu begehen oder nicht.

Die Infotafeln befinden sich an diesen Orten:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Dbf

Gruss
keujfl839237 (2018-10-28 21:54:06+00:00): PS: Ich habe die Wege, an denen sich die Eingangstafeln zum Reservat befinden, als äussere Grenze eingezeichnet. Deswegen ist die von mir eingezeichnete Fläche des Naturreservats kleiner als es wirklich ist.
Nakaner (2018-11-05 12:14:33+00:00): Hallo SWF8,

in meinen Augen ist das ein mechanischer Edit (Suchen und Ersetzen ist mechanisch). Welchen Zweck hat dieser Änderungssatz? Wo wurde der mechanische Edit diskutiert? Wo ist er dokumentiert?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Viele Grüße

Michael
SWF8 (2018-11-05 13:26:48+00:00): Hallo Michael,

ich kann dir versichern, dass es kein mechanischer Edit ist, sondern dass ich ihn händisch und sehr sorgsam durchgeführt habe. Am Inhalt hat sich absolut nichts verändert, nur an der Reihenfolge. Zweck davon ist, dass eine Sortierung und Gewichtung in taginfo möglich wird - da dieses streng alphabetisch arbeitet.

LG SWF8
Nakaner (2018-10-29 09:07:09+00:00): Hi,

why did you change highway=track to highway=residential?

Best regards

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63225513
gseethar (2018-10-29 15:58:43+00:00): Hi Michael,

We saw that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95972645#map=19/51.40317/6.58354 was marked residential. In order to maintain consistency, the segment in question was changed to Residential but the Tracktype was retained as grade3 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype) and hence retains the Unpaved tag.
However Highway=track would have been a better option.
Please let us know your recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Ganesh
kartonage (2018-10-05 14:14:15+00:00): Hallo Findus Petterson,

bitte keine temporären Daten in OSM eintragen. Zudem sei auch gesagt, dass solche Events nicht unbedingt Geodaten sind und deswegen auch keinen wirklichen Objektbezug haben. Für sowas ist eine Benutzung von https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ ratsamer bzw. zu empfehlen.
Die Daten wurden entfernt.

Schöne Grüße
bison166 (2018-10-05 15:45:11+00:00): Vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag. Leider ist die Eintragung der Hausnummer 2 und 4 nicht OSM konform, wobei maps.me nicht der richtige Partner hierfür ist. Wie man Adressen taggt hier : 
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Adressen.
Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
Bitte mache entsprechend die Änderungen.
ulmtuelp (2018-10-08 09:21:03+00:00): Der Historische "Jagdsteig" kreuzt sich selbst und führt durch den Schornstein. Das ist sicher so nicht gewollt?
lionheart81 (2018-10-12 20:11:28+00:00): Kannst du das bitte anpassen?