piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:06:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-11 22:24:11+00:00): Hi, you requested a review, and this looks good. It would be best to square the corners (right click and select "square")
I've done that for you here.
Also, it you know the addresses of nearby houses then please add them too
Happy mapping!
abakus_uploader (2021-02-10 23:32:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
mistergoodnight (2021-02-10 19:09:10+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:06:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:28:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
ted3sco (2021-02-10 19:59:23+00:00): Hello. It's not missing. There is no platform to stop here. It's on the other side of the intersection for the direction Depoul Alexandria -> Piata Unirii.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2521568625.
Appreciate the help, but browser editor is not good for editing relations, especially public transport. Please use JOSM because it has built-in validators. Thank you.
expobrain (2021-02-14 11:33:32+00:00): Hi ted3sco, In though I missed that when I was splitting the tram tracks. Thank you for the fixes and the the suggestion to use JOSM, Ill use that from now on.
geow (2021-02-10 20:54:52+00:00): Hi Papa-online, danke für deine Beiträge zur OSM-Datenbank :-)

Kleinigkeit: "source=Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung" ist missverständlich, da unklar ist, ob dies die Quelle für den (1) Grundriss ist oder/und für (2) die Adressangabe Nur für (1) liegt uns die Erlaubnis zur Nutzung vor, Adressangaben müssen vor Ort recherchiert werden. Es hat sich im übrigen bewährt das source=*-Tag am Objekt nur in spezifischen Einzelfällen zu verwenden, da die Bildquelle von den meistverbreiteten Editoren (iD, JOSM, Vespucci, Go Map!) ohnehin im Changeset dokumentiert werden. Ich würde daher vorschlagen, source=* zu löschen.

Ich schreibe dir dies , weil ein anderer Nutzer dazu einen Hinweis gesetzt hat, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2531504

Beste Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß
geow
Papa-online (2021-02-10 22:41:12+00:00): Hi geow,
vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis / Komentar.

"Bayerische Vermessungsvewaltung" als Quellenangabe gelöscht, wollte korrekte Quellenangabe verwenden. Habe wegen der nicht ganz klaren Hausnummernangaben (Alphabetische Ergänzungen) im BayernAtlas zum Verifizierten nachgeschaut.
Viele Grüße Willi
Andreas Binder (2021-02-11 15:09:56+00:00): Hi Willi, addr:city="Rosenheim , Hohenofen , Pang" sieht nicht korrekt aus. addr:city wäre hier bei diesen Häusern "Rosenheim". Grüße Andreas
Papa-online (2021-02-11 15:18:59+00:00): Hi Andreas, ist zwar die amtliche Schreibweise, kanns aber gern abändern. 
Übrigens: für Pang gilt "Rosenheim-Pang". Hab eben eine Adresse (Panger Eierladen hinzugefügt) von einer Eierschachtel abgeschrieben.
geow (2021-02-11 15:36:53+00:00): Danke Willi, der offizielle Stadtname ist sicher Rosenheim. Natürlich kann der "Panger Eierladen" auf seine Schachteln zur besseren Wiedererkennung noch zusätzlich den Ortsteil drucken ;-)
Papa-online (2021-02-11 15:53:42+00:00): Hallo geow,
folgende Schreibweise benutzt z.B. die Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung:
"Dorfstraße 1 83026 Rosenheim , Pang" oder 
"Hohenofener Straße 53 a 83026 Rosenheim , Hohenofen , Pang" 
ist also nicht nur auf der Eierschachtel so.
Grüße Willi
Andreas Binder (2021-02-11 16:03:40+00:00): Hi Willi,
Pang gibts natürlich und ist ein Stadtteil (=Gemarkung bei der Bayerische Vermessungsvewaltung) von Rosenheim. Bei OSM kommt in addr:city aber nur die Gemeinde/Stadt rein und keine Stadtteile oder Gemeindeteile. Du kannst auch bei OSM nach "Dorfstraße 1 83026 Rosenheim , Pang" suchen und wirst fündig werden (auch mit korrekter addr:city=Rosenheim) Grüße
Andreas
Papa-online (2021-02-11 16:08:26+00:00): @Andreas und geow, 
Danke für die Kommentare und Hinweise.Ich habe jetzt alle betroffenen Adressen abgeänder.
"addr:city=Rosenheim"
Grüße Willi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
olo81 (2021-02-11 20:10:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
w osobnych tagach kolejne nazwy
C2oc4 (2021-02-16 07:19:04+00:00): oki
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
ALu68 (2021-02-15 20:46:30+00:00): Die Angaben in note können in contact:* aufgelöst werden. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303667534
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
streckenkundler (2021-02-10 21:06:21+00:00): Hei,

die Änderung von communication:radio_cottbus=yes zu operator=Radio Cottbus dürfte Falsch sein, genauso wie überhaupt das communication:radio_cottbus=yes erst mal an einen solchen Mast zu setzen... Meiner Meinung nach kann man (wenn überhaupt) ausschließlich durch einen Vorort-Besuch einen operator ermitteln. 
Ansonsten kann ein normaler Mapper nicht (in dem Fall auch ich nicht) unterscheiden, was mit solchen Masten übertragen wird. In Zweifelsfall sind es ausschließlich Mobilfunkdaten und kein Radio.

Sven

PS: Radio Cottbus ist ein kleiner lokaler Sender... es würde mich schon sehr wundern, wenn der was mit diesem Mast zu tun hat...
mueschel (2021-02-10 21:33:54+00:00): Ja, das ist sicher richtig. Zu den Details kann ich aber auch nichts sagen. Du kannst das Tag gerne entfernen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
vojtechzaboril (2024-10-01 19:00:21+00:00): Hi, 
please consider deleting the razed railway as it is not a map feature (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed). It there are visible remains, use railway=abandoned instead.
Best regards.
vojtechzaboril (2024-10-01 19:01:20+00:00): If not clear, this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883915096/history#map=14/47.26478/11.43881) is what I meant.
Paschberg (2024-10-01 19:29:23+00:00): Hello @vojtechzaboril
I discussed this problem already with some other mappers in 2021, when first mapping it. In fact remains on surface can be seen at the rivers Sill an Inn (former bridge abutemnts). The rest cannot be seen and ist also not showed on OSM. But it can be seen in Open Railway Map, where it is useful for me and others who are historically interested in former rail alignements (look here for Innsbruck: https://www.openrailwaymap.org/?style=standard&lat=47.26638777929384&lon=11.424107551574705&zoom=14). It could be comperaed to the former Localbahn- Innsbruck Hall in Tirol that ist shown here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154432034#map=15/47.27867/11.42898 which I also wont miss here. So what do you suggest in order to keep osm syntax clean and avoid loosing information?
Paschberg (2024-10-01 19:37:20+00:00): However, for the first I have actualized the abutments, that can be seen today as railway- abandonded
Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
JayTurnr (2021-02-10 16:52:16+00:00): Hi theantman82, 

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm an avid local mapper based in Thanet.  I would like to welcome you to the community. 

I see you added the layer key to Screwfix, this would indicate that Screwfix is physically on top of the other buildings and nearby paths.

A quick check and other sources are suggesting that Screwfix is on the same level as other elements. What you might have wanted to do is to edit the other building to end just short of Screwfix.

I've made this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99054983 and added an entrance node on the western edge of Screwfix so it's easier to identify the way in.

Welcome to the community. Be sure to check out the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_OpenStreetMap

My messages are open if you have any questions :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
ALu68 (2021-02-15 21:03:47+00:00): Es wird in OSM keine Privatsphäre gemappt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
- name entfernt.
Carto'Cité (2021-02-12 16:17:27+00:00): Bonjour Teuxe,
J'ai fait un revert sur ton changeset. Je te prie de m'excuser. Les raisons : plusieurs multipolygones avait été cassé et ils étaient trop longs à reprendre. Par exemple tu avais cassé le residential de Bussy-Saint-Geoges en doublonnant un de ses membres (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11100945). La manipulation de relation sous iD est souvent un peu compliquée :)
N'hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des questions.
Charles de Carto’Cité
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
Kovoschiz (2021-02-11 00:47:23+00:00): The problem is you are mixing up use on the mode, when this is mentioned to not be favored in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions#By-use_modes. This is not going to be well-supported, compared to the general condition method of `*:conditional=`. `bus=private` and `taxi=private` would be vague, but highly compatible.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-11 01:03:29+00:00): Assuming this is applicable, unforunately there are no ISO 3166-2 sub-division code, where the format would be `*:HK-*=`. UN-LOCODE and HASC has some potentially useful reference. 
It's possible `*:urban=` can be seen as an exception, following `maxspeed=` and `network=`
小智智 (2021-02-11 02:09:53+00:00): I have read the documentation before making the change. The difference between urban and NT taxis are not use of the mode. These taxis are legally different classes of vehicles.

In contrast, if there is a place where taxis without passengers can't enter but taxis with passengers can enter, it will be mapped with a conditional restriction as they are different uses of vehicle.

Only routing software which understand the difference between 3 kinds of taxis in Hong Kong can understand these tagging.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-11 07:01:09+00:00): This is unconvincing. There is no difference between them, aside from their use. The examples of `emergency=` and `hazmat=` are obviously different vehicles by your standard of "legally different classes of vehicles", especially the former concerning Government Vehicle (Class 16) and Special Purpose Vehicle (Class 21). In contrast, all taxis are Class 6.
小智智 (2021-02-11 07:39:55+00:00): Please don't confuse driver licence with vehicle registration. All 3 kinds of taxis are registered as different types of vehicles on their vehicle registrations, although a single class 6 licence is enough to drive them all.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-12 04:25:08+00:00): This is about the vehicle class. You are focusing on the regulation of their use. They are all taxis, only working differently. On vehicle licensing, it is treated as a single item in licensing fee.
小智智 (2021-02-12 04:27:34+00:00): An NT taxi cannot be used as an urban taxi. That's it, unlike emergency=* (where it is only emergency when the flashing light and siren are on).
Kovoschiz (2021-02-12 04:58:16+00:00): "Vehicle property" is also accepted as a condition
Kovoschiz (2021-02-12 04:59:37+00:00): An emergency vehicle is allowed access into an EVA regardless of condition when needed. This is not about driving rules.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-12 05:01:01+00:00): By your logic, a vehicle without emergency lights and equipment cannot be used as an emergency vehicle, so will classify it as a separate vehicle class?
Kovoschiz (2021-02-12 05:11:58+00:00): Again as a comparison, with `motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (hazmat)`, in general, an approved vehicle with containers for Cat.2,5 Dangerous Good is forbidden regardless of whether it is carrying such DG.
小智智 (2021-02-12 05:20:18+00:00): In such case it should be hazmat=* instead of conditional restriction because it now becomes a property of the vehicle itself instead of the use of vehicle.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-12 05:32:41+00:00): But fine, I treat NT and Lantau as a country-state for now. This still leaves `bus:franchised=` out.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-12 05:33:27+00:00): "Vehicle property" is allowed in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions#Condition
小智智 (2021-02-12 05:40:25+00:00): Urban / NT / Lantau taxis, scheduled / non-scheduled service minibuses or franchised / non-franchised buses are not vehicle properties. Vehicle properties refer to something physical like height, weight, width, axle weight, etc. The above are legal classifications instead.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-13 14:55:35+00:00): Look, you disagreed that i=they are not usage. Now I offer another possible interpretation of conditions for you. They are definitely not individual vehicle modes, whether physically, legally, or operationally.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-13 15:04:50+00:00): For example, can a taxi or minibus painted in certain colors and markings be considered a vehicle property, if this is not a "usage"? What is physical property limited to? Is this a necessary or sufficient clause? 
"Usage" may be seen as a load/carrying condition in the prescribed context.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-13 15:14:04+00:00): Vehicle modes in `access:*=` are different from mode of transit or service. `public_transport=` also uses the keys differently.
trial (2021-03-30 19:21:34+00:00): Merci de ne pas casser la voirie ! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38590376
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
olo81 (2021-02-10 16:00:37+00:00): do poprawy nazwyhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
olo81 (2021-02-10 16:04:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891039315
dlaczego skasowałeś: man_made=pumping_station
?
olo81 (2021-02-10 16:19:02+00:00): skasowałeś przepompownie ścieków, tagowanie tego obiektu wskazywało że jest to przepompownia ścieków. Dodatkowo niezgodnie ze sztuką dodałeś operatora do nazwy
C2oc4 (2021-02-10 16:53:41+00:00): Wzorowałem się na innych
olo81 (2021-02-10 16:56:58+00:00): Rozumiem, trzeba czytać wiki, każdy może popełnić błąd. OSM cały czas się rozwija i to co kiedyś przechodziło dziś jest coraz lepiej opisane na wiki i tępione.
olo81 (2021-02-10 16:29:32+00:00): nazwa do poprawy, opis w nazwie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
C2oc4 (2021-02-10 16:55:32+00:00): ale to jest nazwa
olo81 (2021-02-10 16:58:36+00:00): "dla mieszkańców Będzina" to nie nazwa tylko opis
olo81 (2021-02-10 17:01:03+00:00): nie wystarczy zrobić kopiuj wklej niestety
C2oc4 (2021-02-10 17:03:32+00:00): https://www.mops.bedzin.pl/nasza-aktywnosc-ddps/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=443:noclegownia-dla-bezdomnych-mieszkancow-bedzina&catid=10:kontakt&Itemid=410
olo81 (2021-02-10 17:07:50+00:00): widziałem to, ktoś kto pisał stronę tak wpisał. 
Po za tym taka nazwa sugerowała by że nikogo by nie przyjeli bo jak bezdomny ma udowodnić że mieszka w Będzinie?
C2oc4 (2021-02-10 17:10:39+00:00): Z tego co wiem to przyjmują tylko z B-n
olo81 (2021-02-10 17:21:36+00:00): name=Noclegownia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:06:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
Jarek 🚲 (2021-02-10 15:39:58+00:00): not really complete but it's a start
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
ndm (2021-02-10 20:57:04+00:00): Only one short section is one way -- on Bing Streetside.
Roman Oleynik (2021-02-11 07:19:42+00:00): Hello, ndm! I'll revert this change.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
olo81 (2021-02-10 16:37:57+00:00): są tagi że to oczyszczalnia czyli opis w nazwie 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
Langerbrugge (2021-03-19 19:26:29+00:00): Dear 4004,

why have you changed building=industrial to building=yes + man_made=works? This usage is no longer common since nearly 10 years.

Kind regards,
Pieter
4004 (2021-03-19 20:37:11+00:00): Dear Pieter,
apologies, missed the building retag, will revert to industrial now. As far as I know man_made=works is the only widespread way of marking a production facilty, not just a building used for industrial purposes
olo81 (2021-02-10 16:30:26+00:00): nazwa do poprawy operator w nazwie 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
rickmastfan67 (2022-05-19 11:24:51+00:00): I'm curious as to why you took the 'I 26 Future" tag out of the ref tag?  NC has 'normal' looking Interstate shields along this segment, but with a 'Future' tab above them (or some shields with the 'Interstate' text replaced with 'Future').  While the 'fut_ref' tag is also correct, the other info in the 'ref' tag shouldn't have been removed due to it being signed in the field.
curtarledge (2022-05-19 15:19:45+00:00): @rickmastfan67 I made this edit as part of a larger effort to standardize the way "future" Interstates are tagged in OSM. From my survey of other future Interstates, there was no consistency in how Future signage is treated and there did not appear to be a standard practice for this. 

This case is a bit unique because of the discontinuity of I-26 and how long the Future I-26 signage has been used here. (FWIW, I grew up in Asheville and have seen those Future I-26 signs for years and years along this route.) Can you point me to documentation that ref tags should match the signage in the field rather than the official current designation?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-11 06:54:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905854086

farm_auxiliary ? tak w lesie?
Cristoffs (2025-08-11 07:01:10+00:00): To z Bdoot było
Sylabowy Kot (2026-04-12 19:00:35+00:00): Co lepsze, w terenie tych budynków nie ma.
eggie (2021-02-10 16:22:26+00:00): Dag Roland..  Laadpalen hebben in de regel geen naam. Denk beter de name= 	Laadpaal Newtonplein verwijderen

MVG
eggie