piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 07:22:38+00:00): or I can comment on this changesets if you prefer? This list above turned out to be an ugly blob (maybe with extra new lines it would work better... I can post it again if you want with better formatting)
Johnny Carlsen (2023-03-22 08:34:50+00:00): The list above works fine.

Looking at these, I am pretty sure "shop=internet" are supposed to be "amenity=internet_cafe" as you suggested. I do not know how many of these are still around though.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 12:47:37+00:00): If that would be mine editing - I would retag to amenity=internet_cafe and open notes asking whether they exist (and try to process them once next in this area)

Or just open notes
vrmap (2021-01-29 12:49:59+00:00): Ciao Volker, vedo che con questo changeset su alcuni passaggi pedonali hai messo bicycle=no. Non ti sembra eccessivo dato che non c'è un vero e proprio divieto ma basta smontare dalla bicicletta e tenerla per mano?
voschix (2021-01-29 14:33:58+00:00): Probabilmente roba vecchia, che ho messo prima di aver scoperto il tag bicycle=dismount.
Puoi aggiornare tranquillamente.
Luiyo (2017-05-28 07:40:30+00:00): Debería renombrarse a Monte de El Pardo
dgitto (2017-04-09 05:14:40+00:00): cosa è "Pino"? il nome dell'edificio?
mb00md (2017-04-09 09:11:53+00:00): Sì del casolare
Alan Bragg (2015-08-14 12:42:12+00:00): Just thought you'd like to know that natural=tree_row is the correct tag for a line of trees, not natural=tree_line. A complete description is in the wiki at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row
Leon K (2015-08-15 00:33:28+00:00): Thanks, can't have been concentrating as i've used tree_row hundreds of times :-)
keepright! ler (2025-04-24 18:19:09+00:00): Ich hatte damals wohl irgendwie Teständerungen durchgeführt und diese warum-auch-immer in die OSM-Datenbank hochgeladen …
yves klein (2026-07-15 14:34:23+00:00): Aus welcher Quelle geht hervor, dass der Heidenhof am Süd-Ost-Rand den Feldweg und den Waldstreifen (gemäß Luftbildern) einschließt?
streckenkundler (2026-07-15 14:46:52+00:00): Hei, 

...da wirst du keine Antwort mehr erhalten. Der User malenki lebt nicht mehr, schaue bitte in sein Profil. Er ist 2016 in Spanien tötlich verunglückt.

Zum Thema kann ich nichts sagen.

Sven
GerdP (2015-10-22 06:07:27+00:00): please review: you have have mapped a lot of details :-) but improvements are possible:
nodes with waterway=drain: I assume manhole=drain is meant?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:manhole
A lot of nodes are tagged highway=stop or highway=give_way. These tags should be used on highway nodes. If you want to map the sign itself, please use traffic_sign.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
AlexGreece (2018-02-20 09:47:37+00:00): this bus stop  Node: ΓΕΦΥΡΑΚΙ (2786682415)  does not exist anymore.
Nakaner (2015-10-25 10:41:24+00:00): Bist du dir sicher, dass vom Nordportal des Koppelsbergtunnel (südl. Gaildorf West) aus Richtung Schwäbisch Hall-Hessental 120 km/h erlaubt sind? Meine Notizen meinen, dass da ein Lf 7 100 km/h stünde, du hast 120 getaggt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2787097861/history

Falls du deine Notizen von damals noch hast, wäre es nett, wenn du nochmals nachschauen könntest.
bigbug21 (2015-10-25 19:31:55+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Die Notizen von damals habe ich nicht mehr zur Hand, vermutlich ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen oder die zulässige Geschwindigkeit wurde angehoben.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-31 13:57:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273939271 - what tracktype=grade3-5 was supposed to represent?
tuxayo (2015-01-05 22:08:20+00:00): There are problems with this import:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/296859

How could we fix that?
fkv (2016-04-20 08:28:53+00:00): Warum hast du hier den tracktype gelöscht: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78094040/history ?
pjhooker (2014-11-21 10:16:18+00:00): Palazzo Visconti-Castelli (274048683, v1) non è presente il valore "villa" per "building" modifcaito!
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 18:37:14+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2788685347#map=18/53.16879/24.33851 - what kind of tourism attraction is here? With just name tag (google traslate gives "The farm yard" it is not obvious).
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 18:51:48+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1258067 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 18:52:42+00:00): Also, what is the source of data? How you obtained country-wide data about locations of tourism attractions?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-08 12:56:24+00:00): I asked also in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1258063
4004 (2019-04-16 13:03:40+00:00): здрасьте,
не подскажете, где вы нашли этот камень? нет его что то на этом месте
4004 (2019-04-16 13:04:19+00:00): probably to be reverted
pnorman (2015-07-14 09:28:40+00:00): Is 152 really 80 km/h all the way past Fraser Highway?
aharvey (2014-11-07 23:22:39+00:00): Hi,

When you split the Lane Cove River into two multipolygons... they are still the same river, just with a weir in it, shouldn't it all be part of the single multipolygon?
surveyor54 (2020-03-20 19:33:41+00:00): Hi, 
warum wurden die zwei Briefkästen gelöscht?
Sie sind heute noch in der Örtlichkeit vorhanden.

Gruß
surveyor54
os-emmer (2024-11-09 16:58:15+00:00): Hallo Stephan_92,
du hast hier vor ewigkeiten etwas namens "THW Jugend Mühldorf e. V." eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274262455
Was genau befindet sich hier? Diesen Verein kann ich im Handelsregister nicht finden. Existiert der überhaupt noch?
ForstEK (2019-04-09 06:50:51+00:00): Hi!
You marked this object: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274296386, later it was marked as cooling tower, but i mean it's wrong cause cooling towers are huge towers with water and vapour circulation, like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238511541#map=17/50.20502/19.46388. I think better should retag it as ventilation shaft
(https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=ventilation_shaft), it will be more correct.
h_i_ (2015-01-26 12:16:47+00:00): Warum hast du hier eigentlich alle Wege auf Kanalpromenade geändert, ist das wirklich der Name? Ok, über den Namen Betriebsweg WSA kann man auch streiten.
Lachgast (2023-10-16 14:54:12+00:00): Hoi Sander,

Negen jaar geleden heb je de gebouwen van het Sint Vituscollege namen gegeven. Nu lijkt het me dat het gebouw dat je Bèta hebt genoemd juist de sportzaal (dus met de naam Sport) is. Weet je nog waar je de naamgeving op gebaseerd hebt? 
Ik moet binnenkort op de locatie zijn dus zal het daar nog even controleren; maar als ik het nu al weet is dat handig!

Dank!
sander201 (2023-10-16 17:08:33+00:00): Hoi Lachgast, 
Ik krijg niet heel vaak vragen over wat ik negen jaar geleden heb gedaan, maar de reden kan ik me zeker herinneren. Ik was op dat moment zelf schoolgaande leerling op het Vituscollege, dit was hoe we de naamgeving hadden. De bèta vakken werden in dat gebouw gegeven. Het gebouw tussen hoofd en bèta, waar "Sint Vitus College Bussum" staat, zijn de twee sportzalen van deze school. Inmiddels zijn de noodlokalen van 69D vervangen door een nieuw gebouw wat volgens mij Art heet. 69C heette in mijn tijd de recreatieve ruimte (RR)
GerdP (2022-08-06 06:08:13+00:00): Moin!
Ist ja schon lange her, aber ich frage mich, was der Grund für die Verschiebung der Grenze war. tatsächlich dürfte der ursprüngliche Verlauf richtiger sein, denn die Hausnummer 28 gehört zu Düngstrup und nicht zu Rechterfeld.
Ich würde das daher gerne reverten.
GerdP (2022-08-10 06:47:05+00:00): Revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124714280
keithonearth (2017-01-09 22:14:49+00:00): Where did this data come from? It appears to be an import. Was it discussed prior to importing? If so please provide a link to the discussion.

Thank you for any information that can be provided.
keithonearth (2017-01-09 22:20:34+00:00): Oops, I see that the second edit (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21877729) by thevikas provides a source of "election commission of india - public data". So it was an import. As such I'd like more information about any discussion that took place before the import was done. More info about the source would be great too.
keithonearth (2017-02-06 08:11:39+00:00): In addition to my concern about potential lack of discussion prior to an import, I have concerns about the quality and accuracy of this data. Of the 1270 nodes originally added with this edit 183 of them have identical coordinates with one or more other nodes. They were originally added as polling stations, and later edited to schools "so they can show in map", this seems like a pretty clear case of tagging for the renderer. While many polling stations may be located in schools, are they *always* located in schools? It seems unlikely to me. Additionally many of these "schools" are not visible in the Bing imagery, with empty fields or woods clearly visible. Most are located in areas with many buildings, and it's not possible to determine if there is a school present or not.

I hope thevikas will be able to clear up my concerns.
thevikas (2017-03-23 11:59:04+00:00): Just reached here. I did not have any discussion before importing it. Actually it was also my first large scale import. So I also dont know the practises. I just figured out josm changeset format and made myself. The schools were marked since most (99%) polling stations are govt schools. POIs of Kashmir either in google or bing or any other commercial maps are very few. This is not a popular spot of travel compared to many others. But this data is public and can be found in eci.gov sites. Some polling station numbers may change between elections but schools are permament. I dont reside here but I was in Srinagar while I imported it in 2014 (i think). Please ask questions and I can gather better answers from locals.
keithonearth (2017-03-23 19:27:51+00:00): It would be a good idea to read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines. The short story is that imports should only be done with great care. I'm still not convinced that this import is beneficial, and will ask the DWG to take a look.
SomeoneElse (2019-10-03 12:46:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75232380 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some polling stations imported as schools in order to render in India.  Attempts to contact the mapper on changeset 21702908 failed.  See also the discussion on changeset 36460852.
eggie (2018-07-05 07:32:50+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-07-20 10:18:32+00:00): Na een aantal jaren weer aan het mappen en nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
whb (2019-11-19 00:38:32+00:00): Der Straßenname "Beethovenstraße" ist hier bei Maps4BW (LGL) falsch.
Somit wurde in diesem Änderungssatz der zuvor in OSM richtig erfasste Name "Im Bangert" durch den falschen Namen ersetzt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161440420/history
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=spBnGRy0jO8dx8bH9eNx8Q
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=FDbv3kSXeu8n-19zS-yC7w
Die Namensänderung habe ich soeben rückgängig gemacht.
UE_Su (2019-11-19 14:07:36+00:00): Hallo whb,
vielen Dank für die Korrektur. Das tut mir echt leid, hier habe ich LGL vertraut und angenommen, dass der Straßenname geändert wurde, da es die Fortsetzung der Beethovenstraße ist.
utack (2016-06-01 23:06:10+00:00): Auf dem Weg  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138559311  
Ist jede Menge abgerutscht  
Wenn du irgendwann mal hinkommst kannst du evtl die mtb daten anpassen, ich hab nicht genug erfahrung dafür
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-11 17:20:27+00:00): I removed steps tag here based on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/898166793/history - it seems that it was missed when it become tagged as kissing gate

feel free to revert me if my guess is wrong
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-14 13:59:54+00:00): Hello Aurimas Fiseras. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274667149
what is `ye=10000;400` for? #singleuse_key
Aurimas Fišeras (2017-10-14 14:10:21+00:00): Typo, thanks, corrected.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:29+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:25+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
ForstEK (2017-08-14 14:00:21+00:00): Здравствуйте! Укажите, пожалуйста, источник данных по этой линии: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274735122 - для газопровода она слишком прямая, на местности они так не проходят, нужно уточнение
apm-wa (2018-11-18 04:19:36+00:00): Why are these buildings designated as ruins?  They are not ancient.
Protoxenus (2018-09-23 12:19:19+00:00): Hi,
an einer Lampe in der Ulmenstraße steht folgende note: "Keine Änderungen am Datensatz gemacht". Was willst du uns damit sagen? Sind da noch irgendwelche Aktionen erforderlich oder können die note und source weg?
Gruß Protoxenus
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-13 10:35:46+00:00): Proszę nie łączyć różnych POI ze sobą! http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1076148697/history
Geaquinto (2016-01-29 17:18:38+00:00): Arlindo, não entendi. Por que mezaninos não se configuram como túneis se eles têm teto?
naoliv (2016-01-29 18:14:06+00:00): Não sei do que vocês estão falando, mas talvez seja "covered" a chave a ser usada aqui? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
Geaquinto (2016-01-29 18:19:29+00:00): Na verdade, não. É um túnel como os outros, em que os dois lados são paredes
Nighto (2016-01-29 18:34:06+00:00): Hm, faz sentido. Troque aí então :)
Geaquinto (2016-01-29 18:42:25+00:00): Beleza, fazer isso na estação General Osório depois também ;)
Nighto (2016-01-29 18:45:49+00:00): Cinelândia também :) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82897595#map=19/-22.91147/-43.17535&layers=D
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-14 04:29:06+00:00): Do you know if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274833008 is still under construction? Imagery is inconclusive
Julian Lozano (2017-02-23 21:58:41+00:00): As far as I saw 2 months ago, that was still under construction.
hatul (2025-08-04 08:41:37+00:00): שלום זאב

אני לא חושב שנכון להגדיר אותו
bicycle=no
foot=no

הם יכולים להיכנס בתשלום כמו כל אחד. זה אמור להיות access=yes אחרת אנשים יחשבו שהאתר סגור.
zstadler (2025-08-04 10:35:54+00:00): לאיזה אלמנט אתה מתייחס?
hatul (2025-08-04 10:39:56+00:00): סליחה, שכחתי את הקישור.
לשער הזה:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2795052169
zstadler (2025-08-04 11:11:51+00:00): תיקנתי
hatul (2025-08-04 11:24:24+00:00): תודה, אבל עדיין לא נראה לי מדויק.
לפי הבנתי מהוויקי access=customers מיועד למקום שהתשלום לא עבור הכניסה, למשל חנייה ללקוחות של חנות. מספיק פה fee=yes.
zstadler (2025-08-04 12:47:07+00:00): תוכל לצטט או לתת מראה מקום של המשפט/הפסקא/ות שהובילו אותך להבנה הזו?
hatul (2025-08-04 12:58:18+00:00): למשל
If there is a charge to use the facility even for customers, add fee=yes. On the other hand, if non-customers can pay for the service, fee=yes + <empty>.
אחרת כל מקום בתשלום יהיה צריך להיות מסומן עם customers.
zstadler (2025-08-04 16:11:36+00:00): מדובר כאן על מחסום. בניגוד לכל אלמנט אחר במתחם, מתבקש שתהיה לו תגית
access

בהנחה שאנחנו יכולים להסכים עד כאן, לדעתי מדויק יותר לתייג עם
access=customers
מאשר עם
access=yes
hatul (2025-08-05 15:00:50+00:00): לדעתי שתיהן לא מתאימות אבל אם אין ברירה הייתי מעדיף את yes.
בסוף חשוב לי שניתוב יעבור שם, אז אם אפליקציות מנתבות שם, התגית המדויקת לא חשובה. כמה שזה mapping for rendering.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 16:01:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2795082636/history has amenity = water that was added in this edit
amenity=water? What is this?

If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typically
used.

man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.

man_made=water_tap with drinking_water=no is typically used to indicate
tap without drinking water

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=water
bielebog (2025-05-14 21:02:26+00:00): Now that was 11 years ago! :)
This might get sorted out by someone on a Streetcomplete Quest though.
marc__marc (2023-05-08 19:48:35+00:00): Hello,
it's the true name or a mix of a name a the taxon ?
Regards,
Marc
ForstEK (2018-08-10 11:40:47+00:00): Здравствуйте, Егамай! Вы уверены, что здесь пешеходный переход? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2795667416 или это просто ошибка?
dieterdreist (2020-01-27 18:26:36+00:00): great stuff!
GerdP (2015-10-29 11:19:21+00:00): please review:
highway=crane is only used here, sounds like a joke. Was is meant?

Ways 274962577,274962578
zarl (2015-01-21 08:26:59+00:00): Hat denn die Meilerhütte tatsächlich neben der Garmischer PLZ auch eine offizielle Leutascher Anschrift?
Gruss,
Zarl
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:22+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
tyr_asd (2015-01-23 13:52:44+00:00): The elevation of this peak (8747) can't possibly be correct: on SRTM it is measured at around 5200 meters…
KartaBY (2015-01-26 05:31:20+00:00): Ok. My measured  - Baltic system elevation (meter).
marc__marc (2024-09-12 09:49:21+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275163826
c'est quoi un agrogolf ?
connaissez-vous le parcours du sentier pieds nu pour le renseigner ?
Cordialement,
Marc
trial (2017-08-29 19:48:10+00:00): Bonjour ce n'est pas formage ou dessert, le CROSS est bien militaire, pourquoi ne pas laisser les deux ?
Shlublu (2017-08-29 21:47:44+00:00): Je ne savais pas que c'était possible à l'époque. Aussi, effectivement, allez-y.
trial (2017-08-30 17:28:47+00:00): Fait.
DaveF (2019-04-18 20:58:17+00:00): Hi
A while back, but could you clarify what 'track_detail' means?
ika-chan! UK-USA (2019-04-19 00:35:02+00:00): In the early days of OSM, track_detail indicated where individual tracks were mapped. According to taginfo, the UK and Sweden were the main users. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-October/074462.html for more info.
yves klein (2019-08-03 12:49:58+00:00): Die Gemeindegrenze Bockenau hat im Nordosten beim NSG einen etwas anderen Verlauf, wenn ich dem amtlichen LANIS https://t1p.de/ow5d folge. Ich hab leider keine Ahnung, mit welchen Mitteln man Verwaltungsgrenzen korrekt mappt..Könnte sich bitte jemand darum kümmern, der sich damit auskennt? Danke! Yves (Anfänger)
BennietH (2015-06-14 21:11:38+00:00): The city of Winterswijk made a correction in the BAG register, about 5 months ago. Number 11B belongs to this campsite in the forest, about 1000m north of the numbers 11 & 11A. These numbers 11&11A are not changed. Only 11B is corrected in the BAG system.
PT-53 (2017-06-26 09:03:58+00:00): Hallo bahnpirat,
Du hast in diesem CS auch diesen Way eingezeichnet / beaerbeitet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275215114#map=11/48.3230/9.9571
Im OSM-Inspector View Geometry wird dazu eine Fehlermeldung Long Segment angezeigt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275215114#map=11/48.3230/9.9571
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße aus Oberschwaben
TourenbikerFKB (2017-06-26 10:01:37+00:00): ich bin zwar nicht Bahnpirat, weiß aber, dass Richtfunkstrecken nun mal besonders lang sind :-)

Sollten diese überhaupt gemappt werden? Es gab dazu mal eine Diskussion im Forum, aber ich habe das nicht weiter verfolgt.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-06-26 10:04:20+00:00): link zum Forumsbeitrag: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=25250
Arma IRM-ED (2021-06-15 06:41:32+00:00): Hi Papibaquígrafo import
Have a great day

I found that there are 6 relation member(s) as an invalid type in relation 3662513 (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/3662513). So, I have modified the member of this relation because multipolygon relations can only have ways as members
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon). Thank you

Happy Mapping!
Nakaner (2015-02-28 19:40:55+00:00): Haben die Gewanne wirklich auch schwäbische Namen? swg ist nämlich Schwäbisch,  gsw Badisch/Alemannisch. "Kliebe" klingt für mich als Schwäbisch-Muttersprachler nicht Schwäbisch, ich würde das "Klieba" aussprechen.
q_un_go (2015-02-28 20:38:51+00:00): naja, es ist eine Boshafttigkeit von mir. Ich geb's zu. 
Es ist linguistisch eh falsch: Das ie steht ja schwäbisch und alemannisch für einen Diphthong, lange i wird ii dargestellt. Und die Endung hinten ist ein Schwa. Der wird je nach Region unterschiedlich dargestellt. Im Elsass wird von den Franzosen das a statt des e bevorzugt, was die Wörter für Deutsche schwer lesbar macht. Ein Schuft, der Arges dabei denkt. Ich hau die name:swg bei Gelegenheit mal in meiner Heimatgemeinde raus.
SK53 (2017-12-31 17:21:36+00:00): Hi,

In this changeset you changed the name of Judd Street Open Space to Bramber Green. Last time I passed (after your edit) it was still signed Judd Street Open Space. What is your source for "Bramber Green". 

I was alerted to this by a recent note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1253885

Regards,

SK53
yourealwaysbe (2017-12-31 19:10:46+00:00): Thanks for getting in touch.  The name came from the estate map displayed somewhere nearby.
https://imgur.com/a/nI0L3
I can't remember for sure why i removed "Judd Street Open Space", though it sounds like i was wrong to do so.
yourealwaysbe (2017-12-31 19:13:22+00:00): Looks like it should be Judd Street Open Space with Bramber Green as the "alt_name":
http://cindex.camden.gov.uk/kb5/camden/cd/service.page?id=5Wq8Gs8XeRo
Apologies.
SK53 (2017-12-31 21:07:36+00:00): No need to apologise! Your change was based on ground-truthed data. I think your suggestion is very sensible. Probably whoever runs the housing having different ideas from the council leisure services. I'll have to see if happen to have any photos of the area (I often do a bit of surveying if am near Kings Cross).
goedegazelle (2017-11-20 10:32:17+00:00): It looks as if the shop type " 	funeral_directors" was mistakenly replaced with the number 90969868. Is it still a shop?
Regards.
jotpe (2017-11-20 17:27:45+00:00): Which node do you mean?
goedegazelle (2017-11-21 11:31:44+00:00): Good question. I hope that this link works: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90969965#map=19/50.90087/7.02931
jotpe (2017-11-21 20:13:45+00:00): Yes this was a mistake. But the shop it doesn't exist anymore. See https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/wP7ND4pJyuKekvlxCFHZYA
user_21215681 (2024-03-18 07:15:10+00:00): ここは閉業して､｢かつや　南鶉店｣になりましたよ
user_21215681 (2024-03-18 07:17:17+00:00): ファミリーマートではなく｢ニッショー　中鶉店｣になりましたよ
yasunari (2024-03-19 09:09:11+00:00): こんにちわ。
オープンストリートマップは気が付いた人が自分で修正するのがモットーです。
修正をお待ちしています^_^
HubMiner (2015-04-08 17:36:35+00:00): Hi vickyp,
I think "Route to bike path" should be combined with "Fox Trails Drive North", and give the drive appropriate attributes that it has a sidewalk along it.  Please let me know if you agree, and I will make the edits (unless you want to do it).
Thanks!
vickyp (2015-04-08 20:23:52+00:00): Hi g246020, 
Go ahead and combine them, just know that for part of the path there is no sidewalk.
Sergey82K (2018-11-08 10:36:35+00:00): Що в цій точці? Немає опису:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1968326458
int_ua (2018-11-08 10:45:25+00:00): Звісно ж, через чотири з половиною роки я вже не памʼятаю, на жаль. Я там досить рідко буваю, тому перевірити чи там все ще щось є найближчим часом не можу.
danieldegroot2 (2022-05-01 10:58:37+00:00): Hey Joel,

Welkom terug bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

Ik zou je eerdere wijzigingensets graag willen reviewen, maar jammergenoeg heb ik hier niet de tijd voor.

Groet,

Daniel

namens de OpenStreetMap-gemeenschap
Alan (2020-05-04 04:17:12+00:00): 👍
Protoxenus (2020-05-22 16:04:58+00:00): Hallo, 
du hast hier an der Kartierung einer  Kabeüberwachungsstation mitgewirkt. Das ist aber eine Luftgütemessstation.  

Gruß Protoxenus