piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
manoharuss (2016-12-05 07:46:51+00:00): Hi Akram Dandal,

Welcome to OpenstreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated.

But this alpine hut you have mapped seems to have been mapped on a residential area according to satellite imagery. It would be great if you can correct this. 

Best,

Manohar
freebeer (2018-05-30 14:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59401395 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal inappropriate spammage
user_5359 (2016-12-06 15:04:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-06 15:04:20+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-06 14:58:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did You see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1769004610 ?
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:47:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:44:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:44:23+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:40:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:37:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I add a business description (amenity=dentrist) and repair your street jam moving a street crossing over other streets (picture exists).

I f you need help: You are welcome!
muzirian (2018-12-04 09:00:50+00:00): looks like govt school was mistakenly renamed to st thomas, changing back name.
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:31:56+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
ff5722 (2016-12-05 08:32:01+00:00): 如果興趣點不是单大厦，你应该不使用building=yes。
请查看这个图片：http://homepage.tudelft.nl/p9t69/Capture.jpg

我也想提倡，看到'all tags' ， 这样你能懂系统更好。然后如果你不知道用什么标签，你可以找到在wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
（对不起为我中文）
有一些中国人你可以问他们当你有问题：hanchao，FreedSky
literan (2016-12-05 17:39:25+00:00): вы здесь поставили взаимоисключающие теги. access=no значит что шлагбаум высотой два метра, подлезть/обойти нельзя, и он не открывается никому - т.е. его нельзя преодолеть даже пешком. При этом ставите тег motor_vehicle=private - т.е. на мотоцикле/авто по ключу можно. А что же там на самом деле? пока удалю оба тега, а вы поставьте правильные.
literan (2016-12-05 18:26:53+00:00): также, шлагбаум и ворота должны быть частью линии дороги (чтобы навигаторы их учли), а не просто стоять рядом, как сделали вы. Я поправлю.
Fiks (2016-12-05 19:11:02+00:00): Извините за ошибки и неточности, просто хочу внести свежие нововведения. Поправьте, пожалуйста.
Шлагбаум от машин, вот он http://savepic.ru/12483564.jpg.  Я вроде ставил всем-да, автомототранспорту- private. Давно не был на проекте osm, исправьте, как правильно.
literan (2016-12-05 20:38:21+00:00): ага, поправил. Если что, просто ставьте заметку (note) в нужном месте на http://www.openstreetmap.org с описанием ситуации - они сейчас довольно быстро обрабатываются
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:29:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mueschel (2016-12-07 11:24:10+00:00): Hi,
all the nodes you added in this changeset are pretty useless for OSM: They don't have any tag describing what they are. No map or software can use them in the present state.
Please have a look in the wiki, e.g. for example how shops have to be tagged.

Jan
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:39:47+00:00): [Cavite, Muntinlupa and Batangas] add/modify various POI's
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:28:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:28:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
R0bst3r (2016-12-05 09:53:37+00:00): Hallo ZwergFinbar,

willkommen bei OSM.
Deine ersten Schritte hast du bereits gemacht. Sieht sehr gut aus.

Wenn du Fragen oder Probleme hast, hilft dir das wiki unter http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page weiter. Alternativ unterstütze ich auch gerne.

MfG, R0bst3r
FTA (2016-12-07 02:48:05+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. The edits you are making go directly into a live database, so please don't doodle--it appears you've made a hexagonal airport runway and added a shop tag to a reef. If you have questions about mapping, please do ask on the http://help.osm.org, http://irc.osm.org, http://forum.osm.org sites or alternatively in changeset comments or via private message. Thanks!
majkaz (2016-12-05 09:02:13+00:00): duplicate
highflyer74 (2016-12-06 11:47:19+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please make sure not to tag the nodes of a building. Only the way of the building is supposed to be tagged.

Thank you!
mueschel (2016-12-06 10:04:06+00:00): Hi,
I found the misspelled key "add:province" (instead of 'addr:province') 198 times in your edits. Would you mind correcting it?

Let me know if you need help,
Jan
mavl (2016-12-08 09:10:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. На пешеходные светофоры не нужно ставить тег highway=traffic_signals (он только для автомобильных светофоров). [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals]
py_berrard (2016-12-06 08:08:23+00:00): Bonjour,
Penser à ajouter la source pour les bâtiments importés du cadastre.
BrBr (2016-12-06 09:30:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci, j'avais en effet oublié, c'est ajouté maintenant.
trigpoint (2016-12-05 18:21:19+00:00): Please stop adding personal marker to OpenStreetMap, there are no Alpine Huts in London.
trigpoint (2016-12-06 18:24:31+00:00): Reverting no response again
opendcc (2016-12-05 13:26:11+00:00): Hallo,

als Hinweis: in Bayern kann man die Luftbilder des Landesvermessungsamtes Bayern in JOSM wählen. Diese sind a) aktueller und b) positionsgenauer als die Sat-Bilder von Bing und als Quelle zugelassen. Nachgeprüft am Georeferenzpunkt in Mühldorf auf dem Stadtplatz: ja es ist genauer. Bevor man also eine Linie anhand von Bing verschiebt, wäre es durchaus sinnvoll, das mal gegen das Luftbild des Vermessungsamtes zu prüfen.

Vielen Dank.
tklug (2016-12-06 07:21:00+00:00): Hi,
danke für den Hinweis. Da viele Details auf den Bildern schlecht zu erkennen sind haben wir sie nur sporadisch genutzt und uns eher auf Bing gestützt. Wir werden jetzt vermehrt darauf achten.
mfg
Thomas
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-05 19:40:44+00:00): Hi Ender SAGBAS, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44178106
اسی۱۳۶۸ (2021-01-22 12:53:54+00:00): اسم پارک شهید محسن عطائی چرا شماره نوشته اسمشو
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:21:36+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:20:28+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:21:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Mrka Lunja (2016-12-05 10:30:44+00:00): Asfaltirano
Rodrigo Rega (2016-12-06 22:11:51+00:00): Las casas añadidas no se corresponden las fotos de satélite [1] ¿Son correctas?

¡Gracias por el mapeo!

[1] http://i.imgur.com/DoXYmui.png
soyMgomez (2016-12-06 22:52:19+00:00): Si no me equivoco son correctos, ya que aunque se vea una sola edificación se tratan de dos viviendas(pareadas). Siendo la zona marcada la finca de cada una de ellas tal como se puede ver en la web del catastro.
MKnight (2017-01-07 15:00:16+00:00): dispensing yes oder no auf der rhön-Apotheke? Eins geht nur.

Auch sollte der Poi nur einmal da sein, wahrscheinlich der Node
MKnight (2017-02-09 14:21:55+00:00): behoben.
Fischkopp0815 (2016-12-05 12:31:18+00:00): War es Deine Absicht hier Admin&Postal boundary zu verschieben. Soweit ich weiß liegt das Haus Schüttung 1a in Ramhusen (laut Schild am Anfang der Auffahrt, postalisch aber ev. in 25693 (Volsemenhusen u.a,steht leider nicht auf dem Schild). Hast Du da eine andere Quelle.
GeorgFausB (2016-12-09 09:13:53+00:00): Oops - da war ich wohl zu luschig beim Abarbeiten der PLZ-Fools.
Nein, eine konkrete Quelle liegt mir da nicht vor, ich bin da von einer geschätzten admin-Grenze ausgegangen.
Wenn die Sachlage aber anders ist, muss man die beiden Relationen (admin und postal) wohl trennen.
GeorgFausB (2016-12-09 09:55:40+00:00): Da die admin-Grenzen wohl nicht nur geschätzt waren, werde ich den Änderungssatz revertieren.
GeorgFausB (2016-12-09 09:59:14+00:00): Erledigt.
Die PLZ-Relation muss allerdings noch angepasst werden.
BharataHS (2016-12-05 13:31:15+00:00): Apologize.
I was trying to test out a simple script but accidentally uploaded these POIs to OSM through my general account. Sorry again.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-05 16:42:35+00:00): Well at least you spotted it :)
Most "osmapi" users don't...
user_5359 (2016-12-05 20:20:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the building? Is your restaurant on a parking lot?

If you need help: You are welcome!
BharataHS (2016-12-05 13:32:16+00:00): Reverted my erroneous previous changeset: 44179744
BharataHS (2016-12-05 13:30:59+00:00): Apologize.
I was trying to test out a simple script but accidentally uploaded these POIs to OSM through my general account. Sorry again.
user_5359 (2016-12-05 19:43:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
BharataHS (2016-12-05 13:32:44+00:00): Reverted my erroneous previous changeset: 44180272
user_5359 (2016-12-05 19:42:56+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
IIVQ (2017-02-28 22:18:27+00:00): Hoi Otto (I assume you speak Dutch),

In deze changeset heb je een boel afvalpunten op de kaart gezet bij sniep met 
Amenity=waste_disposal
Name=Glas
Op zich fijn, maar het kan beter.
De name-tag is alléén voor echte namen.
Je kan dus beter amenity=recycling
recycling:paper=yes
recycling_type=container
en dan zonder naam doen.
Dit kan in JOSM gewoon met een preset onder facilities.
Ik heb dat al met twee gedaan als voorbeeld, bijv https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4426824919.

Groet,
Tijmen/IIVQ
OttoR (2017-03-02 13:57:30+00:00): Hi Tijmen
I did not know! thanks, ik heb ze aangepast!
Gelijk een update gedaan aan de hand van het PDOK materiaal.
IIVQ (2017-03-06 21:02:11+00:00): Helemaal top!
It's a Boy (2016-12-05 11:58:58+00:00): Quee
user_5359 (2016-12-05 19:41:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-05 19:35:43+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-05 19:35:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-05 19:14:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
trigpoint (2016-12-05 12:59:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however we tag disused things as disused:shop, disused:amenity etc. That tells the render not to render them. Changing the name implies there is an object called Empty, which is no the case.
Happy mapping, Phil
Rizki IRM-ED (2023-01-16 06:57:29+00:00): Hi Aung izay
Thanks for your contribution to OSM. I came across this area https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/457894870 and found some issue but I am not sure as armchair mapper.
Please come a look this coordinate 20.1270881, 95.4701333
There’s an intersection between highway and waterway, and I can't determine whether there is a ford here or not. Would you mind to recheck this location. Please feel free to discuss if you have any other suggestion?
Thank you
user_5359 (2016-12-05 19:14:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
trigpoint (2016-12-05 12:50:06+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however you do need to tag the objects you add. As a minimum they will need building=yes, area=yes isn't needed very often.
Cheers Phil
user_5359 (2016-12-05 16:12:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Unfortunately, your website has a bug (GoDaddy problem?), so that the nature of your business can not determine.
LivingWithDragons (2016-12-21 14:01:05+00:00): It would be helpful to record a GPS track and add footpaths in this area. Also would be great to add the name and extent of the nature reserve it's in (if it is) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve
Fellwalker (2016-12-23 12:23:53+00:00): Agreed. I've not visited for a couple of years, but the Durham Bird Club magazine had an article about open days last month at the hide, which is what triggered adding it.
Fellwalker (2016-12-23 12:24:37+00:00): So far as I know, it is not actually a nature reserve, just a pond that is used for bridwatching.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
dvdhoven (2016-12-05 18:04:32+00:00): Egbert,

Ik heb de fijnafwerking gedaan.
Routes lopen altijd van knooppunt naar knooppunt, dat betekent dat 83-84, 84-86 gesplitst moeten worden, knopen en routes moet lid worden van het netwerk Drechtsteden.
Ik heb ook de routes aangepast en 10-11 ook aangepast, bij forward/backward gelden bepaalde regels, nl dat de terugrichting altijd tegen de rijrichting ingevoerd wordt vanaf het splitspunt.
Ook maak ik bij meerdere knooppunten, zoals 11 en 86 de route "rond" en maak geen tentakels. Dat is veel te lastig.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
dvdhoven (2016-12-06 06:52:38+00:00): Oh ja, kleine nabrander.
Knooppuntroutes krijgen geen name tag, maar een note tag met daarin de knooppuntnummers (laag-hoog) met een streepje ertussen
eggie (2016-12-06 08:00:38+00:00): Dick,
Bedankt voor de fijn-tuning en de uitleg.
Kwam er niet helemaal uit. Toen ik knooppunt 10 lid maakte van het netwerk was ik de oude route 83-84 kwijt. weet nu waarom. (had moeten splitsen) 
10 en 11 zijn nieuwe knooppunten. Het is een beetje een vreemde "eend" in de bijt van de oude routes. 
Vanaf de Badweg wijst de route tegen het eenrichtingsverkeer in linksaf fietspad oranjelaan op. Je kunt er al heel lang niet meer oversteken. Het eenrichtingverkeer het ik al jaren geleden weggehaald. Onduidelijke situatie en de routemaker heeft er niet over nagedacht..
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:45:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433744 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44182759 because there was a problem with licence of data use
user_5359 (2016-12-05 15:56:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-05 15:55:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
Nakaner (2016-12-11 14:27:43+00:00): Hallo Bot45715,

Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an einem längeren Streckenabschnitt maxspeed=50 getaggt. Was ist die Quelle dieser Information?

Warum hast Du auf diesem langem Stück layer=1 getaggt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258866368 Bitte benutze nicht blind die Reparatur-Funktion des JOSM-Validators. Das zählt als mechanischer Edit, der den Automated Edits Code of Conduct zu befolgen hat. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Zuletzt möchte ich Dich noch einmal daran erinnern, aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare einzugeben. Dieser Änderungssatz hat kein Haus bearbeitet (und der vorhergehende auch nicht, weshalb ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler nur durch die Verwendung zweier Computer möglich ist)

Viele Grüße

Michael
OSM-Bot (2017-02-14 15:37:50+00:00): Hey, die vom Bahner genannte Geschwindigkeit der Bahn ohne beschrankte Übergänge.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433701 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44183467 because there was a problem with licence of data use