piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-02-15 19:58:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Martin Borsje (2018-02-15 21:28:40+00:00): maak building=office
office=yes zegt niets

(ik heb het gedaan :-)
eggie (2018-02-16 10:30:19+00:00): .. en op de node kun je office= logistics  toevoegen.   (An office for a forwarder / hauler )
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Digne (2018-02-15 20:22:49+00:00): Hallo holescheese,

Ik had hier even naar gekeken omdat er feedback was aangevraagd. Het ziet er allemaal goed uit. Ik zou alleen adviseren "wandelpad" te selecteren in plaats van "stoep". Met "stoep" komt er een sidewalk tag bij die bedoeld is voor trottoirs parallel aan de straten, maar die worden over het algemeen niet ingetekend in Nederland. Met "wandelpad" is alles hetzelfde, maar zonder footway=sidewalk tag.
eggie (2018-02-15 20:23:09+00:00): Tip.. footway=sidewalk is een bug in editor iD Die tags kunnen eraf. Je kunt heb ik begrepen in iD ook kiezen voor wandelpad. dan komt die preset er niet bij.
Ook niet met de kaart schuiven in de editmode. Je hebt dan kans dat je onbedoelde schade veroorzaakt. Dus een straat editen en vervolgens opslaan. Uit de editmodus en dan de kaart verplaatsen.

Je path zonder naam zit geplakt aan de landuse. Dat geeft problemen. Ga je zelf aan de slag?
holescheese (2018-02-15 20:47:17+00:00): bedankt voor de tip. ga ik onthouden en herstellen
eggie (2018-02-16 08:48:09+00:00): Oke... succes... De boundery is al door een andere mappers net hersteld zag ik.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:30:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
gurglypipe (2018-02-15 21:33:37+00:00): Nice one. Note that the platforms and stop_positions for a given bus stop have to be in a stop_area relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area).
lakedistrict (2018-02-15 21:49:44+00:00): Thanks, I'll do that at some point.
CBu201 (2018-02-15 21:30:37+00:00): correctie bewerkingstekst: 
Huisnummer 2-ws veranderd in 2b,
eggie (2018-02-15 20:18:56+00:00): Tip: Een drain loopt in een verharde bedding of betonnen bak. Wellicht beter ditch gebruiken.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:21:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-03-30 12:32:39+00:00): No i co te "testy" wykazały?
szalona_entropia (2018-03-30 18:09:25+00:00): Że przez miesiąc nikt nie zgłosił żadnych zastrzeżeń.
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-03-30 18:39:18+00:00): Mylisz się, dzisiaj widziałem uwagę dotyczącą tej właśnie zmiany.
szalona_entropia (2018-04-01 10:49:14+00:00): To mogłeś od razu ją tu przytoczyć  zamiast bawić się w jakieś podchody.
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-04-01 16:48:45+00:00): Może i mogłem.
szalona_entropia (2018-04-01 18:27:54+00:00): Aha, czyli zwykła złośliwość, tak jak sądziłem. A rzekoma uwaga albo nie istnieje albo nic merytorycznie nie wnosi do tematu.
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-04-01 19:54:11+00:00): Czy wnosi? Oczywiście, że nie. Bo ileż może znaczyć uwaga jakiegoś anonimowego ludka, który zastanawia się, czemu ktoś awansował DK do trunk? A co do uwagi - chyba nie jest dla Ciebie problemem znalezienie uwagi w tak małym obszarze?
szalona_entropia (2018-04-01 20:17:26+00:00): Ludek zapytał "czy jest tu klasa S?' I uzyskał odpowiedź, że nie, i że droga jest otagowana jako droga klasy GP (zgodnie ze stanem faktycznym). Więc nie, taka uwaga nie wnosi nic do dyskusji na temat tagu highway.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:25:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Martin Borsje (2018-02-15 21:14:42+00:00): Voorzichtigaan mappen!

Een pad waar fietsers en voetgangers overheen mogen noem je gewoon 'path'. Pedestrian is meer een voetgangerszone, vaak ook als are getagd.
Default access is voor fietsers en voetgangers al geregeld, dus dat kan eraf.
Martin Borsje (2018-02-15 21:18:20+00:00): Verder leg je de weg niet vast aan de zijde van de parking en schrijf je de naam van een straat natuurlijk met een Hoofdletter
Martin Borsje (2018-02-15 21:19:11+00:00): Ook de area parking graag netjes aanleggen aan de omringende landuse: geen overlapping of vacuüm.
Searchie (2018-02-16 08:57:27+00:00): Ik zal het nakijken voor de zekerheid, maar dit pad is een voetgangersgebied voor een school, vandaar de keuze "pedestrian".

De aansluiting tussen weg en straat zal ik maken, alleen "snapt" JOSM niet de punten met elkaar, dus het is een beetje op gevoel om vacuum te voorkomen?
Martin Borsje (2018-02-16 09:35:48+00:00): Een voetgangersgebied kun je ook als area taggen (zie ook het forumbericht)

En dat JOSM de nodes niet aan elkaar klikt is een zegen!
Jeison Pandini (2018-02-20 12:09:31+00:00): Não sei em qual categoria colocar, porque não poderia dizer que é uma Oficina de Eletrônicos.
OF0 (2018-02-16 12:28:46+00:00): Weshalb trennst Du Landflächen von Wegen? Das ist eine anerkannte Mappingtechnik:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
PT-53 (2018-02-16 13:28:58+00:00): Ach OF0,
das weßt Du doch ganz genau: Weil die Verklebung bei der Überarbeitung von highways teilweise hinderlich ist.
Grüße
OF0 (2018-02-16 16:43:41+00:00): @PT-53

[...] Weil die Verklebung bei der Überarbeitung von highways teilweise hinderlich ist. [...]

Ach PT-53. Das ist hauptsächlich ein Problem des verwendeten  Editors (und selbstverständlich auch anderer Editoren).

Unzulängliche Editoren sollten nicht dazu führen die Realität nicht hinreichend genau abzubilden. Bei JOSM gibt es die Möglichkeit eine einzelne aus mehreren übereinanderliegender Linien zu selektieren. Ist zwar grundsätzlich nicht ganz so praktisch wie die Selektion unter iD, dessen Stärke leider nur bei einfachem, progressiven Mehrfachnutzen von Knoten durch Wege und Flächen zum Tragen kommt. Und wem das nicht genügt, der sollte auf den/die Hersteller seines bevorzugten Editors Einfluß nehmen.

Wie Du siehst, ist vandalieren nicht notwendig. Auch eine Desinformationskampange in Changesetkommentaren (neuerdings auch per PN) neuer Beitragender in der behaupted wird, es herrsche bei OSM Einigkeit, Wege und Flächen sollen keine Knoten teilen, ist vollkommen unangebracht.

Mit "Respekt vor der Leistung anderer" wird man bei so einem Verhalten auch nicht mehr glaubwürdig argumentieren können.

Gruß zurück.
PT-53 (2018-02-16 17:09:23+00:00): Hallo OF0,
so wie Du das Verkleben verteidigst, so verteidige ich das trennen!
Grüße
OF0 (2018-02-16 21:30:03+00:00): @PT-53

[...] so wie Du das Verkleben verteidigst, so verteidige ich das trennen! [...]

Hat jetzt zwar nichts mehr mit diesem Changeset zu tun. Trotzdem: Ich will absolut niemanden das Recht für seine Meinung einzustehen absprechen. 
Wer ein einem öffentlichen Kommunikationsmedium - wie zum Beispiel hier - unterwegs ist, muss mit Widerspruch rechnen. Allerdings hinkt dein Vergleich zwischen uns doch sehr. Ich würde nie einfach behaupten, das "Malen nach Zahlen" gleichende Darstellen der Straßenflächen durch Weglassen der tatsächlich vorhandenen Verbindung zwischen Straße und angrenzenden Landuse sei im OSM verpönt um meine Ansicht manipulativ durchzusetzen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53805080

Grüße zurück
TourenbikerFKB (2020-06-20 15:16:07+00:00): Das Autohaus Winkler gibt auf der Webseite Haus-Nr. 3 als Anschrift an. Und genau dort gibt es bereits seit 2015 einen Node "Autohaus Winkler" - auf Luftbildern auch zu erkennen. Schaust du dir das nochmal an?
TourenbikerFKB (2020-06-21 18:46:16+00:00): Ich war heute vor Ort. Haus Nr. 2 ist ein Wohnhaus --> Node gelöscht.
user_5359 (2018-02-16 05:07:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice my correction of the baseball field notation.
mk2k22 (2022-09-04 08:02:43+00:00): Hi, do you have any source reference for the name "Selenitza"?
nebulon42 (2022-09-04 18:29:11+00:00): Hi, yes, the official Austrian Basemap calls it like that: https://basemap.at/bmapp/index.html#{%22center%22:[1582872.2105534081,5851647.325228774],%22zoom%22:20,%22rotation%22:0,%22layers%22:%221000000000%22}
mk2k22 (2022-09-04 18:34:02+00:00): I see, thanks!
Martin Borsje (2018-02-15 21:27:16+00:00): zie de edits van eggie
eggie (2018-02-16 09:14:49+00:00): Oke..  :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
user_6110846 (2018-02-15 20:53:56+00:00): 
Доповнення  д о коментаря
виправлення також по Світанок М і 
зупинки в Лумлі
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:18:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:28:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Constable (2018-02-16 18:38:13+00:00): ciao, sulla base di cosa hai spostato la gallerie di alcune decine di metri in direzione nord-est?
Inoltre, per favore inserisci dei commenti comprensibili quando salvi le modifiche alla mappa "(nessun commento)" non aiuta gli altri mappatori a capire cosa hai modificato.
Attendo una tua risposta, grazie, ciao!
hardcoredarksky (2018-02-15 21:41:37+00:00): 6,388 edits on the town of Luray.
Constable (2018-02-19 09:30:27+00:00): here as well, watch out, you don't have a lake in your backyard, it's a pool
Please use the right tag then
Thanks
aseerel4c26 (2018-02-15 22:15:52+00:00): Hi WayneSchlegel,

sind die gelöschten Märkte (wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421338201/history ) geschlossen/nicht mehr existent? Was ist deine Quelle? Warst du jeweils vor Ort?
WayneSchlegel (2018-02-16 04:43:22+00:00): Servus,
ich habe keine Märkte gelöscht, sondern diese teilweise als eigenständige Knoten ausgegliedert.
freebeer (2018-02-16 08:26:47+00:00): Y0u have deleted a separately-mapped building 0utline, 0nly t0 replace that area with a single p00rly-situated n0de, destr0ying 0ne particular mapper's detailed data.
In additi0n elsewhere y0u have ch0sen t0 g0 against the current accepted practise 0f efficiently and accurately representing businesses as areas, by deleting that inf0rmati0n and duplicating it in a redundant, additi0nal n0de, g0ing against the examples 0f all nearby businesses mapped as accurate areas.
.
I feel this changeset sh0uld be reverted as it und0es the w0rk 0f 0ther mappers, degrades the quality 0f 0SM standards in 0rder t0 f0rce 0ne particular business m0del int0 the 0SM c0mmunity 0f mappers.  Discussi0n 0f similar c0ntr0versal and disputed edits in Belgium and the Netherlands have sh0wn an unwillingness t0 adapt a particular business interest int0 c0mpatibility with the 0SM c0mmunity, but instead a desire t0 maintain t0tal c0ntr0l 0f the data and n0t all0w the 0SM c0mmunity the ability t0 impr0ve up0n it by adding n0n-c0mpany-appr0ved yet useful inf0.  The Belgian changeset c0mmentary with a far larger c0mmunity participati0n has n0t even reached a l0gical c0nclusi0n and c0mmunity agreement.
aseerel4c26 (2018-02-16 20:30:14+00:00): Ah, als https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5415214538 ist der von mir angesprochene Markt nun eingetragen. Okay, aber wieso als Knoten und nicht als die genauere Fläche? 

Kannst du mir außerdem die übrigen Fragen von oben bitte beantworten (Was ist deine Quelle? Warst du jeweils vor Ort?)?
Prince Kassad (2018-02-17 09:13:08+00:00): wurde offenbar revertet in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56431816 - ich war auch etwas stinkig, weil die Fläche dort auf mein Konto geht und ich aus gutem Grund indoor-mapping angewandt hatte (es handelt sich um ein großes Gebäude mit mehreren Geschäften und mehreren Eingängen)...
freebeer (2018-02-18 11:01:03+00:00): That is only a partial revert, Prince.
Your work on way 38626565 in changeset #55360096 wherein you've unified all the retail businesses to adopt the same æsthetically-pleasing mapping style, has been undone with the addition of an unnecessary additional node now appearing out-of-place and off-centre.
It doesn't even offer any additional useful information such as being positioned at and tagged as the building entrance (lacking in this area), it simply draws attention to itself as an outlier, as not conforming to current accepted advanced mapping technique and risking falling victim again quickly to similar map-improvement.
(As an aside, it makes itself vulnerable to editor iD's Vanderlismus as befell the Othello Bar in Freiburg/Br., now resulting in its entire original history having been lost.  But that's not my concern.)
The other buildings are the responsibility of other mappers including one hsimpson whose prominence as a community participant is immediately recognisable to me as an outsider, as is yours.
Just to clarify your response.
gurglypipe (2018-02-15 22:42:56+00:00): Don’t you need a separate stop_position for stop cumdjpgd (Collin Road junction)? The northbound and southbound platforms are quite far apart, and the southbound one has a separate layby.
gurglypipe (2018-02-15 22:43:05+00:00): (Thanks for the changes!)
gurglypipe (2018-02-15 22:48:39+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56398943.
John-O (2018-02-15 23:12:27+00:00): I was going to add that when I do the 555 Kendal to Lancaster section. But thanks for adding it
eggie (2018-02-16 08:53:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-02-16 08:57:56+00:00): Dag Marcel... Vaak is het zo dat er een uitzondering van de eenrichting is voor (brom-)fietsen. Dat geef je aan door bij te taggen:
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:moped=no

Graag reactie,
Eggie
Marcel Daverveld (2018-02-16 19:22:04+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Ben nieuw met het edditen van OSM, goed punt niet aan gedacht dat voor (brom-)fietsen andere regels kunnen gelden.
Marcel Daverveld (2018-02-16 19:30:21+00:00): Heb de oneway:bicycle=no toegevoegd, Voor moped geld de oneway wel volens mij
eggie (2018-02-16 20:02:35+00:00): Oke... Dat kan... dat het alleen voor fietsers geldt. Dank voor je reactie.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:20:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
eggie (2018-02-16 09:13:38+00:00): wellicht heb je hier ook wat aan https://blog.mapbox.com/become-a-power-mapper-619077da4ef4
en zorg dat bij kaarttekenstijlen aanstaat:
josm standaard
colorize bicycleroutes
wandelknoppuntennetwerken
openbaar vervoer

Handige toetsen zijn
G  . losmaken
M .vastmaken
C. combineren. 
P. splitsen

succes..
Constable (2018-02-16 07:55:04+00:00): ciao, sono incappato per caso in questo incrocio, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53529976/history , vedo che non è colpa tua, però è ancora presente il vecchio tag oneway=-1. In casi analoghi il tag va trasformato in oneway=yes e va invertito il senso di marcia, oneway=-1 non è più un valore accettato. Il tag oneway accetta solo valori "yes" o "no", l'assenza del tag implica oneway=no, quindi doppio senso di marcia.
Attendo qualche ora in modo che tu possa capire a cosa mi riferisco, poi se non mi dimentico correggo io.
Ciao, grazie!
pigio66 (2018-02-16 08:15:17+00:00): Ciao. L'ho corretto. Ho visto che ci sono tre aiuole spartitraffico. Andrebbe indicata come "grass"? Qui,  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2068123219
caso analogo, è indicata come "traffic_calming island" è corretto?
Constable (2018-02-16 09:09:03+00:00): ciao, grazie, io il tag traffic calming l'ho sempre inteso come un tag per indicare che c'è un qualche ostacolo costruito con lo scopo di rallentare il traffico (dossi, chicane, strettoie,... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming ), in questi due casi io non lo userei, quelle dal mio punto di vista sono solo aiuole usate per separare le corsie di marcia, le mapperei come aree con tag landuse=grass , alla pari di queste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192227259 (primo esempio a caso che ho trovato)
Ciao
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-16 21:55:19+00:00): Concordo con Constable riguardo al traffic_calming.
Alan (2018-02-15 22:13:13+00:00): Hi there, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for contributing!

Can I ask about the place_of_worship you just added? denomination=sunni and religion=buddhist aren't two things that usually go together. Is one of those an error?
chachafish (2018-02-25 02:13:42+00:00): Howdy, and thanks for all your hard work adding to the map. I just wanted to reach out to you and let you know your work is appreciated, but a lot of your work won't actually link to the map. The problem is that if a building is, for example, at 760 Coyote Circle, but it's mapped as 760 Coyote Cir., it pops up as an error and won't link to the map. Another random example would be 228 N Dory Lakes Drive. It won't link because we don't use abbreviations with the names of streets. Fortunately, when entering info into the map there is a drop-down menu, so it's easy to enter, North Dory Lakes Drive. If you go back and correct all your edits, they will link correctly in the database. If you have any questions, feel free to ask :)
rsavoye (2018-02-25 02:42:44+00:00): Unfortunately the abbreviations are in the imported file. I've been fixing them as Validation finds them. I've been mostly focused on adding tags and fixing bad Tiger data in this county. Fixing all the name is the next pass through the data.
chachafish (2018-02-25 02:46:28+00:00): Good to hear. Thanks :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:27:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Baloo Uriza (2018-05-04 01:26:27+00:00): Please attach land use areas only to the outline of the area, not the road centerlines.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:27:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
apm-wa (2018-03-15 02:29:46+00:00): Why are you changing the names of parks in Ashgabat to incorrect variants?
degernfelder (2018-05-12 21:26:24+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
bitte nach Erledigung eines Hinweises auch den Hinweis löschen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.