piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
vincent_95 (2021-06-07 19:35:20+00:00): monsieur,
merci pour ce commentaire
à l'avenir je tacherai de mieux faire :p
rthik007 (2021-06-08 05:41:29+00:00): Hi KlaraMMoore,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road way 875098766.
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106008326
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105982966
Kogacarlo (2021-07-03 17:12:08+00:00): De maximum snelheid staat volgens mij op borden als je het terrein op rijdt en wordt nergens opgeheven.
Kogacarlo (2021-07-03 17:12:59+00:00): Dit is geen openbare weg he.
Joopvdl (2021-07-03 18:12:45+00:00): Zo ver mijn wetkennis rijkt is dit wel een openbare weg. Het eigendom/beheer van een weg heeft niks te maken met of het wel/niet openbare weg. Er staat nergens aangegeven dat het om privé terrein gaat en er hangt geen bordje verboden voor onbevoegden, buiten kantoortijden wordt het hek afgesloten. Bij het oprijden passeer je wel een C1 bord met als onderbord "Uitgezonderd bestemmingsverkeer".  Je zult hier dus in de praktijk enkel rijden als je bij een van de gevestigde bedrijven dient te zijn.

Verder staat er inderdaad een snelheidslimiet bij het oprijden van de Floriadelaan (15 km/u), echter betreft dit een A01 bord en geen zogenoemd zone bord. Dit dient dus na elke zijweg herhaald te worden, aangezien dit niet gebeurd is de wettelijke snelheid (ik vermoed buiten de bebouwde kom) van kracht na het passeren van de eerste zijweg.
rthik007 (2021-06-08 05:36:45+00:00): Hi KlaraMMoore,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with track road way 819162167.
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106007995
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105983759
mariotomo (2021-07-25 12:15:21+00:00): la laguna tiene nombre Laguna? o caíste en el error de utilizar un nombre descriptivo? quizás querías añadir la etiqueta water=pond?
MauCal (2021-07-25 15:51:19+00:00): Hola, la laguna no tiene nombre, los pobladores le llaman "La Laguna"

La definición de "pond" dice que es agua estancada casi siempre hecha por el hombre, en este caso es natural, no importa?
mariotomo (2021-07-25 18:16:08+00:00): si los pobladores le dicen "La Laguna" entonces me parece bien marcarlo como su nombre.  quizás completo con el artículo?  sobre añadir water=(lake|pond), no sé.  creo que la indicación en el wiki inglés (man-made in most cases) no es muy útil y la ignoraría.  en otros idiomas no aparece.
MauCal (2021-07-25 18:22:16+00:00): Ok, voy a modificarlo a "Pond"
Leo1590 (2021-06-07 18:07:20+00:00): Hola! En la etiqueta name no corresponde el nombre del propietario.
Cualquier duda no dude en consultarla a través del canal de telegram de la comunidad argentina https://t.me/osm_ar
1090MHz (2021-06-07 16:39:52+00:00): Mistakenly labeled as Cargill canola processing facility.
ToniE (2021-06-07 16:48:13+00:00): Hi CreCrePl,

FYI.

"DeutschePost website"

we do not have the right to use the information from that site - copyright problem.

Please be careful with source of information.

Br
Toni
CreCrePL (2021-06-07 16:53:11+00:00): Is there a list of websites that we can't use?
ToniE (2021-06-07 17:04:29+00:00): We do not have a blacklist, but rather a whitelist and "waiting for answer"

Avoid copying data from any website unless you know you're allowed.

If in doubt, don't copy.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Permissions

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Permissions
ToniE (2021-06-07 17:15:53+00:00): BTW. I've noticed a lot of your edits.

Unfortunately, iD (the Browser-Editor you use) has problems with splitting ways and resorting affected route relations.

I'd recommend to use JOSM instead (josm.openstreetmap.de)
SomeoneElse (2021-06-07 17:05:07+00:00): Hello Henry,
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it exists, not as you might like it to.  What you probably want ed to do was to ensure that the access tags on paths etc. were correct.  Why you chose to delete woodland etc. I have no idea.   I'll restore them and then review the access tags on paths etc.
Best Regards,
Andy
Henry Ropner (2021-06-07 17:08:47+00:00): Andy, this is not woodland - it is a private collection of trees and botanical garden. As the owner of this site I reserve the right to ensure that it is not been represented. Please do not restore paths or woodland features. Thank you
SomeoneElse (2021-06-07 17:28:11+00:00): Henry,
I'm trying to help you here.  Simply deleting everything again whilst I'm trying to set access tags etc. in line with your presumed wishes is extremely unhelpful.
"Just deleting everything" will not work - people will simply remap what they can see from aerial imagery (without access tags).
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-06-07 18:04:20+00:00): I’ve now changed everything that was deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105985206 to access=private .
However, I don't know that I haven't mistagged any (as yet untagged in OSM) PRoWs, so access tags may need revision in line with that.
Also "private" may not be the correct access tags for all ways; "customers" may be better in some cases - please discuss.
DaveF (2021-06-08 13:38:36+00:00): Hi
All railway=stations are mapped. Please refrain from adding duplicates.
PhilBike24 (2021-06-21 13:17:05+00:00): Hi
Livepool One bus station roads do not appear when tagged as busways. In common with other bus stations I think they should be tagged as bus only minor roads.
Cheers
thewilk (2021-06-21 13:21:00+00:00): Thanks, great advice Phil!
Jakka (2021-06-07 18:08:14+00:00): Please do not wait for saving your edits. (110
390 677 changes ...) It is difficult to help verifying your work. Have you done a validation on the area ? Take small ones
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105985650
IIVQ (2021-06-07 18:12:47+00:00): I have done a mega-fix on other's errors, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=831750.

It is really annoying to upload halfway.
Jakka (2021-06-07 18:24:00+00:00): OK was a idea ;)
Hugoren Martinako (2021-06-22 09:56:13+00:00): Morgen,

May I ask why is the technical reason to use shared ways instead of closed ways? Is there any improvement, in terms of performance? Is that applicable, for instance, to contiguous buildings or landuses also?
I was reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area/The_Future_of_Areas but I couldn't find any significant explanation.

Vielen Dank
user_177389 (2021-06-22 13:55:04+00:00): Hello,

shared segments are better to maintain, especially for simpler editors like iD. In this area in particular, there would be three lines on top of each other in many places (two from neighboring districts and one street segment). A newcomer can hardly choose the right line.

The point of relations is to be able to group the members together. Otherwise there would be no need for relations. However, closed ways AND relations are superfluous. But not quite: these are also required to be able to define admin_centre or label node.

I think it is the cleanest solution as it is now, as it has been established everywhere in the administrative boundaries. If something breaks, I can find it and fix it better than if I ignored the boundary lines because of the overlap.

Best regards
Mario
maraf24 (2021-06-09 18:17:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:stars
SomeoneElse (2021-06-07 17:36:59+00:00): I've reviewed https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/105986923/download to look for designation tags (there aren't any) of explicit foot, bicycle or horse tags (likewise).
Therefore this does seem to fit with the presumed intent of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105985206 .  However, I don't know that I haven't mistagged any (as yet untagged in OSM) PRoWs, so this changeset may need revision in line with that.
Also "private" may not be the correct access tags for all ways; "customers" may be better in some cases.
user_5359 (2021-06-13 16:13:12+00:00): Hello! Short inquiry to the key service_times: the services are held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case add a Su (followed by space character) at the beginning of the value. Please notice also: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
mariotomo (2021-06-08 19:02:13+00:00): Hola joserrg12.  esta vez tiene autorización para copiar de los mapas del IGN?  solucionaste eso del  https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/89215504 con woodpeck?
ottwiz (2021-06-07 17:36:52+00:00): Also aligned the Mt. Nebo Scenic Byway in some parts.
TheSwavu (2023-01-01 01:51:29+00:00): Changeset has been reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130736524
eggie (2021-06-07 19:34:20+00:00): Dag Cityhub.. Geen access=no op paaltjes zetten. Geen motor_vehicle=no ...
Dat is default.
Wel moped en mofa=yes als brommers er door kunnen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-07 19:36:40+00:00): accesstags aangepast
eggie (2021-06-07 19:43:33+00:00): Kijk hier hoe dat te taggen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Geen motor_vehicle=yes gaan taggen hier. 
Het is prive terrein.. Dus met conditionaltags kun je dat aangeven.
opening_hours= is voor bv winkels.

access:conditional=delivery@ (Mo-Fr 09:00-18:00)

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-07 19:45:25+00:00): accesstags op hek aangepast
DanGlover (2021-06-12 19:49:37+00:00): Hi Mapper 8 - the post box reference here is in a strange format so possibly a mis-type, but the expected value is BB9 175. RM have been known to make mistakes though.  Are you able to confirm, please?

Regards,

Dan
tekim (2021-06-07 21:58:42+00:00): Good to see the Loveland boundaries get some attention!  I have been meaning to take a look at them for awhile, but there are so many other things to map!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105988261
gpserror (2021-06-07 23:44:19+00:00): I was wondering about the zoning of the new Ent credit union as well as some of the new residential neighborhoods ... and lo and behold! They were actually Loveland after all...   So I just edited the 287 corridor north loveland boundaries as best that makes sense including apparently now totally surrounding the mobile home parks up there.

TBH I'm just eyeballing and getting the vertexes within a few feet or so versus using exact coordinates if I can even find them.  The old boundaries didn't even seem close so I think my edits were at least closer but if exact long/lat coordinates are needed let me know and I'll lay off of editing any more.
Minh Nguyen (2022-07-27 18:03:16+00:00): Hi, I noticed you’ve retagged many of the streets in downtown Knoxville as highway=living_street. Living streets are a largely European concept that rarely if ever occurs in the U.S. – very low-speed streets that tolerate cars but are primarily intended for pedestrians, who have the right of way. There’s a special sign for it and everything. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street

During the pandemic, some mappers did stretch this tag to include “slow streets” programs that encouraged outdoor dining on city streets, though most of those programs have since been curtailed. Has this been the case in Knoxville?
TravGW (2021-06-07 18:36:07+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! For future reference, you can add a speed limit directly to the road itself. For instance, in this changeset rather than naming the point where the speed limit begins, you would split the road at that point. Then you would add the speed limit to the newly split road. 

I have already made the needed changes. You may wish to review them to view proper speed limit tagging. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105989518

See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
ma-rt-in (2021-07-03 07:34:07+00:00): Hallo,
auf welche Beschilderung hin, hast du die access-tags gesetzt für den Platz?

vg
ma-rt-in (2021-07-03 20:48:17+00:00): Hat sich erledigt, war heute selbst vor Ort
InfosReseaux (2021-06-23 08:40:39+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour tout ces ajouts

Je cherche à comprendre ce qui a pu vous inciter à ajouter utility=power sur les lignes électriques, ce n'est pas nécessaire en réalité.
utility est limité aux bâtiments, armoires, pas aux composants actifs des réseaux.
Est-ce qu'une indication dans la documentation serait à reprendre ?

Une ligne aérienne de cette nature se tag habituellement power=minor_line + operator=... + cables=3 + voltage=20000

Bonne journée
_1110 (2021-06-23 08:56:11+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la remarque.
J'avoue l'avoir ajouté un peu de façon unilatéral car l'attribut n'est pas toujours indiqué.
Je vais reprendre petit à petit et le retirer des lignes.
TheSwavu (2023-01-01 01:45:03+00:00): Changeset has been reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130736463
jaap de vries (2022-01-11 07:48:31+00:00): Ik zie dat je hier landuse=education hebt aangepast maar daardoor vervalt de tag amenity=school en dus ook het gele school vlak. Let je hier even op?
Tilia_J (2022-01-11 13:03:18+00:00): Beste Jaap,

amenity=school was al op de adresnode getagged.

De gebouwomtrek is reeds getagged als building=school

Dan is een logisch gevolg om de omtrek te taggen als landuse=education

Deze landuse=education is april 2021 formeel goedgekeurd, juist om te voorkomen dat er twee keer amenity=school getagged wordt, zoals jij nu weer hebt gedaan (dit geeft ook een foutmelding tijdens valideren)

voor het als geel vlak weergeven van landuse=school is een wijzigingsverzoek in behandeling. Hier kan enige tijd overheen gaan, en het taggen voor de renderer in de tussentijd is niet wenselijk.

Ik verzoek je dan ook je wijziging weer terug te draaien, zodat weer voldaan wordt aan "One feature, one OSM element"

Met vriendelijke groet,

Tilia
tux67 (2021-06-08 07:11:27+00:00): Hallo JuergenOlfen,
wie bereits beim letzen review angemerkt, ist bei OSM das name feld nicht ausreichend um ein Objekt zu dokumentieren. hier fehlte ein office=lawyer.
Schlimmer ist allerdings einen Hausnummern Node mit einer neuen - an dieser Stelle nicht korrekten Hausnummer zu versehen um die Änderung duchzuführen. Leg' bitte in Zukunft für solche Änderungen einen neuen Node für den POI an.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105989288
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:57:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
mariotomo (2021-06-08 18:57:55+00:00): hola, bienvenido a OSM!  con el objetivo de mejorar tanto tu experiencia como el resultado en el mapa, quisieras asomarte a la comunicad local?  por ejemplo en https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61 o en https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
ottwiz (2021-06-07 18:58:32+00:00): Oh, i didn't align the byway. Interesting :d
literan (2021-06-07 20:07:23+00:00): в русском языке не используется латиница, поэтому тег name:ru=Marriott Аврора выглядит абсурдно. Удалю.
BartekChom (2021-06-08 15:23:28+00:00): Как предпочитаете. Я не русский. Но сейчас вижу «История отношения: Marriott Aurora», а с name:ru видел бы «История отношения: Marriott Аврора». Аналогично на сайте https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=55.7622085&lon=37.6157129&zoom=18
literan (2021-06-08 15:42:34+00:00): you should not map for render, it's one of base principals of the OSM project. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_for_the_renderer

In Rusiian language we use only cyrillics. So if you want add russian name, you should use only cyrillic charcters. Thank you.
solenoid jam (2021-06-08 15:23:29+00:00): Наверно не стоило добавлять "поляну ЛТС АВП"
Все же сходы это событие, а не географический объект. 
На форуме было обсуждение про такие "места", решили не отмечать, потому-то тут не событие производно от места, а место от события.
Да и нужно-ли отмечать места приватных посиделок? Кому надо тот найдет, а чужим лучше не засвечивать.
Я трогать не буду, но может вы сами прикроете это дело, если  со сказанным согласны?
amgusha (2021-06-08 15:38:56+00:00): Это интересный вопрос. У меня были сомнения насчёт нанесения этого места на карте, но в wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site сказано, что можно наносить "стихийные места, пользующиеся популярностью у местного населения или туристов", и вроде бы этот критерий подходит. Потом, в Подмосковье аналогичная площадка уже порядочное время отмечена на карте без моего участия - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11577749/history#map=18/56.63349/37.48944 , и логично добавить и эту площадку. Аргументы против - я вообще не люблю наносить на карту неофициальные camp_site, во избежание затаптывания, загаживания и прочего негативного воздействия на природу несознательными гражданами. В общем, у меня нет точного решения этого вопроса. Физически стоянка там есть. Возможно, неплохим будет компромиссный вариант - убрать название. И тогда нужно вносить изменения на обе площадки. Тут надо подумать.
solenoid jam (2021-06-08 16:10:15+00:00): А в этом месте кроме сходов АВП другие сходки происходят? Кто-то говорил что на Дубне мусор после чужих пьянок собирали. Стало быть там camp site устоявшийся, а про клязьминскую поляну я такого не слышал. Надо написать кому-нибудь из организаторов, они знают. 
Но на Дубне название надо убрать все равно.
amgusha (2021-06-08 16:29:25+00:00): Там место с хорошей доступностью, у реки, вблизи достаточно крупных городов, соответственно следы стоянок есть, и не только на этой "поляне". Ничем не хуже попадьинской.
solenoid jam (2021-06-08 16:42:37+00:00): Ну думайте. На мой взгляд названия надо убрать в обоих местах, поскольку они относятся к событиям, и не выражают того что там бывают стоянки других людей.
mariotomo (2021-12-24 21:33:23+00:00): hola bienvenido a OSM.  para los principiantes es útil que se pida revisión, y aprovechar de los comentarios.  espero siga tu interés.  mira: el comentario debe presentar los cambios para nosotros que nos dedican a revisar las contribuciones. "mapeo" no dice mucho, aquí sería "añadí unos edificios".  el nombre de un edificio no presenta su uso sino su nombre propio.  igual como "Josue2507" no se llama "persona".  si un edificio es una casa, se etiqueta con "building=house".
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
DaveF (2021-06-08 13:52:44+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM
Could you clarify the purpose of your edits?
MatthieuMartin (2021-06-07 20:45:15+00:00): Bonsoir Djiril,

La suppression des entrées/sorties a supprimé toutes les numérotations de la rue qui étaient renseignés sur ces même noeds/node.

Cordialement,
Cyril5C (2021-06-08 06:45:29+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu,
Ah zut comme je ne le voyais pas sur les autres rues je ne pensais pas que c’était utile pour la numérotation…
Comment puis je annuler ce groupe de modification ?
Je débute, merci de votre aide.
Bonne journée
MatthieuMartin (2021-06-08 20:51:51+00:00): Bonsoir Djiril,

J'ai restauré les modifications pour ce changeset.
Voir le tag addr:housenumber avec la relation Rue Balard cela permet de situé le 100 de la Rue Balard :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2255844124
Bonne soirée,
Matthieu
TomPar (2021-09-22 16:44:43+00:00): Pretty sure bicycles and horses are not allowed on most of the "hiking trails" in the WMNF.  E.g. Fishin' Jimmy Trail now has horse=yes and bicycle=yes with your changeset.  Was this added in error?  If not would appreciate a reference to support this change.  Thanks.
Greg_Rose (2021-09-22 17:38:45+00:00): The USFS themselves mark that trail as "Managed For Hiking" and "Open To Pack And Saddle" and "Open To Biking". Is there local signage that contradicts this? If so, it wouldn't be the first time.


https://www.fs.fed.us/ivm/index.html?minx=-7983168&miny=5485679&maxx=-7981878&maxy=5487733&exploremenu=no 
(click on the trail)
Greg_Rose (2021-09-22 17:39:42+00:00): Actually - I just notice that this is part of the AT, so that HAS to be bad data. Investigating...
Greg_Rose (2021-09-22 17:55:43+00:00): So the WMNF - like all NFs I map in - expressly allows mountain bikes in most areas:
"All trails, roads, and *travel corridors on the White Mountain National Forest are open to mountain bikes except in Congressionally designated Wilderness areas, on the Appalachian Trail, or where otherwise posted.
https://www.fs.usda.gov/activity/whitemountain/recreation/bicycling

I don't see anything about stock usage though, and that's weird. But horses are commonly allowed by default on most USFS trails. I'm fixing the AT screw-up right now - I've seen that in some ranger districts they ignore the AT's special regulations for the IVM, which is pretty lazy on their part.
TomPar (2021-09-22 17:58:11+00:00): Thanks, really appreciate seeing the reference.  I didn't even know that site existed.  Perhaps you could include this reference in subsequent changeset comments.

On most of the trails, in decades of hiking there, I have never seen a horse or mountain bike.  I don't think you could even physically get a horse or mountain bike UP those trails unless you were carrying either on your back.

I have yet to find an online reference saying they are NOT allowed, but I thought I recalled seeing some signage but not recently.  I'll continue to look.  In any event, I think you'd get a chuckle from some local folk if they saw horse=yes on some of those trails.
Greg_Rose (2021-09-22 18:10:04+00:00): No problem - the IVM is an invaluable resource, and if I could I'd reference it in my changesets. The problem is that there's not enough room for sources in changeset fields - I commonly am using 5-10 different sources at once as I map, and the changeset schema won't let me list more than a couple.
I've been thinking of posting my sources on my user page as a blanket sourcing document - better than nothing ?

So I've fixed the access on the AT - that was a complete brainfart on my part - thanks for spotting it.
TomPar (2021-09-22 21:15:12+00:00): A broader discussion for the OSM community: does horse=yes tagging implies some sort of suitability of being able to ride a horse on those trails?  ...especially without additional "horse_scale=*" tagging   My direct local experience is yes it does.  Though it may be "technically" correct, I think it's confusing and misleading.  And though we're not supposed to tag for the renderers, the likes of Gaia are representing these trails differently.
Luz R Finley (2024-06-14 14:16:45+00:00): Ist die angabe von "lockable" wirklich notwendig hier?
Luz R Finley (2024-06-14 14:20:22+00:00): I reverted the changeset 105992636 because lockable is no usefull information in this context.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152681554
Baloo Uriza (2021-06-15 14:04:18+00:00): addr:street= should probably be "South Western Avenue"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105992886
Ser9ei (2021-06-07 20:28:58+00:00): А что не так было с natural=earth_bank? и зачем вместо тега добавлять note? Для кого? Для указания покрытия, по-моему, можно было просто добавить earth_bank=grassy_steep_slope https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dearth_bank
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105993323
GamovaM (2021-06-08 09:01:22+00:00): Тег natural=earth_bank ставится только на линейные объекты
Ser9ei (2021-06-08 09:52:05+00:00): Да, действительно. В таком случае надо было просто разрезать вей, а не ставить неправильный тег.
GamovaM (2021-06-08 16:10:47+00:00): Да, вы безусловно правы, но я считаю, что для полигона это наиболее подходящий тег, а резать вэй опасаюсь, тк не знаю точную ситуацию на местности. Если Вы знаете, поправьте на Ваше усмотрение, пожалуйста
Ser9ei (2021-06-08 16:49:08+00:00): ОК, поправлю. На будущее: если точно не знаете, как исправить/замапить, напишите лучше коммент к пакету, если заметили ошибку. Одну ошибку заменять другой смысла, на мой взгляд, нет.