piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 19:28:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Noen (2017-11-16 20:26:24+00:00): Hei!
Jeg ser at du la til et område for Ringerike sykehus, selvom det fantes et fra før.
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540405990 og https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120226616)  Pass på å rette det som allerede ligger inne i OpenStreetMap, istedenfor å legge til duplikater.

Forøvrig har du lagt til mye bra i dette endringsettet!
eggie (2017-11-14 12:03:51+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Wellicht toevoegen op een node:
leisure=sports_centre
sport=paintball
En de exacte locaties zijn nu juist wel van belang binnen OSM.
De gebouwen die er echt staan kun je rechthoekig maken door recht te klikken op het gebouw. Er gaat dan een keuzemenu open.
Gebouwen die er niet (meer) staan uiteraard weghalen.
Mocht je vragen hebben... stel ze gerust.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-14 16:19:37+00:00): De tag construction=path heb ik eraf gehaald. 
het is immers geen construction meer en ook geen path maar een cycleway.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:46:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:53:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:25:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:19:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Hjart (2017-11-14 12:40:24+00:00): What makes you think this was illegal?
Hjart (2017-11-14 12:42:43+00:00): None of the aerial imagery here is blurred, so it would absolutely pointless to forbid mapping
mavl (2018-12-25 19:34:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:00:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
GerdP (2017-11-15 08:07:24+00:00): Hi!
What is meant with highway=погорелова ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101311183
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-11-23 22:16:08+00:00): Você desconectou as vias aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5228157948 e ela é pavimentada.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-11-26 13:24:23+00:00): Eu conectei os pontos aqui mas ela está fora do lugar, veja: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5228157412 está longe da estrada real.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
geow (2017-11-14 20:30:58+00:00): HI  j1scad, danke für deine Beiträge!!
Kleiner Tipp zu Luftbildern:  In Bayern empfiehlt es sich als Hintergrundbild statt Bing besser die Bavaria DOP 80 cm zu verwenden.
Im Gegensatz zu Bing sind die Bavaria DOP 80 cm nicht nur aktueller (2015 vs 2012, sondern mit Hilfe eines digitalen Geländemodells auch korrekt entzerrt und lagetreu (Orthophoto).
Kannst du im iD-Editor in den Hintergrundeinstellungen (Ebenen) in der rechten Werkzeugleiste auswählen.
Vergleich mal das Gebäude San Gabriele/Il Convento, dann siehst du was ich meine: Bei Orthophotos sind die Hauswände nicht zu sehen. 

Danke, dass du OSM besser machst!

Gruß
Klaus
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:14:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
carciofo (2018-07-10 09:02:49+00:00): Station names should reflect the name as it appears in official schedules. Do you have any verifiable source where the station name appears with the line it serves in parenthesis as this changeset indicates?
carciofo (2018-07-10 09:04:26+00:00): The change to subway station will be reverted, as this is an aerialway station, not a subway station. Such tagging is mapping for the renderer.
Zverik (2018-07-10 09:22:32+00:00): If I have changed a station's name, I am sorry. I indeed have no source for names, except for Wikipedia.

Regarding stop area, these are different. On interchanges, there are several stop_area relations to be collected into stop_area_group, and I use line numbers in parentheses for ease of editing. If you are okay with similarly named stop areas, please go ahead and remove line numbers from their names.
carciofo (2018-07-10 09:43:51+00:00): I think you're missunderstanding what stop_area_groups are for. They aren't meant to be used in simple cases like these. The complexity increase is only justifiable when the names of the station change depending on the line they serve, which is not the case here (from the original proposal: "Sie sollte nicht als grundsätzliche und einzige Möglichkeit zur Modellierung von Umsteigebeziehungen missverstanden werden, sondern als Möglichkeit mehrere Gesamthalt-Relationen zusammenzufassen, die beispielsweise nur durch Namenszusätze voneinander unterschiedene Teile eines Haltes repräsentieren. Es sollte also nicht für jeden Halt, an dem mehr als eine Verkehrsmittelart hält, eine Gesamthalt-Gruppe erstellt werden, sondern nur dann, wenn es mehrere Halte gibt, die nur durch Namenszusätze voneinander unterschieden sind [...]" see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Proposed_features/Public_transport_schema)
Zverik (2018-07-10 10:15:07+00:00): I (and other mappers who look after subway systems) use stop area groups for interchanges, that is, for mapping a relation between stops in an interchange. I do not speak German, but the google translation reads very close to that.

I'd also like to point out that the proposal you link to is abandoned, and the version that was approved does not mention stop area groups at all: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Public_Transport&oldid=625726
carciofo (2018-07-11 11:00:25+00:00): The fact that it's abandoned bears no meaning, as the idea of the tag is first documented there. The explanation is clear that such a relation is only to be used when the name of the different stops in an interchange differs; again that's not the case here. The increase in complexity is unjustified for the tagging structure you're applying.
Zverik (2018-07-11 15:11:36+00:00): The question is not in compexity, but in usability. The proposal you're pointing to was written in 2010 with no understanging how the data could be used for anything but rendering. Only in 2017 the first public transport router was made. Its approach to stop areas is practical, and does not incur too big of an overhead. For example, how else would you indicate to which station of these in an interchange a platform belongs?
mapper999 (2017-11-14 19:32:52+00:00): Ist amenity=car_wash hier wirklich der richtige Tag? Ist eher ein Fahrzeugpflege-Service und keine normale Autowaschanlage.
goedegazelle (2017-11-15 08:36:43+00:00): You are probably right and I changed it to shop=car_repair. Thanks for pointing this out!
mapper999 (2017-11-16 19:21:43+00:00): Thanks for changing it, eventhough I'm still not sure what is the right tag, but I will have a look at it.
Sorry for writing the first comment in German, I didn't realize that you don't speak German.
goedegazelle (2017-11-17 15:15:18+00:00): I understood very well what you wrote. Regards!
mavl (2018-12-25 19:28:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
carciofo (2018-07-10 09:00:32+00:00): Hi, what is the reason for having two separate stop area relations for each line? All features belong to the same station, and a stop area relation is meant to group such features, irrespective of which line they serve. I look forward to your response, in the absence of which your changes will be reverted. Thanks.
Zverik (2018-07-10 09:20:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for reviewing my edits. I modified and created some relations to make subway routes conform to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping — which allows them to be used in maps.me application. You can see the validation result right here: http://osmz.ru/subways/colombia.html

A stop area marks a single station. Its use is unclear in the current public transport schema, so everyone chooses their interpretation. I intend to fix it in PTv3 later this month.
carciofo (2018-07-10 09:50:18+00:00): First, applications conform to OSM tagging practices, not the other way around. Secondly, stop area is well defined and understood by the community. See my other comment in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53770759 regarding stop areas
Zverik (2018-07-10 10:11:21+00:00): Well, 170 out of 180 metro systems in the world are tagged like this, so you can say wiki is a bit out of date. Wiki should describe tagging practices, and not go against them.
carciofo (2018-07-11 10:03:11+00:00): Sure, if you create a validation system with incorrect assumptions and get to the task of fitting tagging of every instance to the validator, then the numbers you cite aren't surprising :)
Zverik (2018-07-11 15:16:24+00:00): There is no "correct" and "incorrect" in OSM. Only tagging that people and software use or don't.
apm-wa (2018-07-30 16:24:42+00:00): This is not an accurate portrayal of the boundary of the former Shanghai neighborhood.  I have redrawn it, removed the greenfield tag, and retagged as boundary=historical, area=no.
eggie (2017-11-14 14:20:00+00:00): ik heb Bank ING opgezet naar ATM ING. Klopt dat?
amenity=atm
David01! (2017-11-15 08:19:23+00:00): Ja klopt.
eggie (2017-11-15 09:20:09+00:00): Oke... bedankt voor de reactie.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:59:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Hjart (2017-11-14 16:54:41+00:00): Du fik ikke rettet butikkernes kategorier. Det har jeg dog gjort nu
Cascafico (2017-11-14 15:44:52+00:00): Per il distributore in disuso, anteporre "disused" ad amenity:
disused:amenity=fuel

Se in via di smantellamento:
abandoned:amenity=fuel
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:08:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Gppes (2018-02-09 10:21:12+00:00): Hi,

Nur eine kleine Detailfrage:
Muss man die Kirche vom Friedhof wirklich ueber ein Multipolygon ausnehmen?

Lg, Gppes
eriosw (2018-02-09 17:07:15+00:00): Vermutlich nicht. Egentlich sollte der renderer die Kirche über den Friedhof setzen. LG Erich
naoliv (2017-11-14 15:08:15+00:00): Why did you remove a lot of data here, please?
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
EugenyN (2017-12-16 16:25:35+00:00): эта дорога https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496635230#map=15/51.8710/39.4820 в правой части полностью непроходима (никак не пролезть). дороги давно нет. как и некоторых других.  не нужно рисовать дороги по спутнику, без подтверждения gps треком ! тем более в лесу. часто картинка спутника не соответсвует местности.
dima100 (2017-12-18 05:53:32+00:00): Конкретно про эту дорогу я ничего не помню. Если вы точно знаете о её состоянии и внесли эту информацию в карту, что ж, замечательно...
EugenyN (2017-12-18 08:02:46+00:00): проблема в том, что если качество дороги или её наличие достоверно неизвестно, то лучше не рисовать такую дорогу вообще. т.к.  отсутсвие данных лучше чем ошибочные данные в этом случае. как  с т.з. редактора карты, так и с т.з. пользователя.  (пошли  на выходных прогулятся по лесу км на 17, оказалось что две дороги полностью и давно завалены, но на карте они были нарисованы)  может  они были нарисованы до вас, и история затёрлась. в любом случае  сколько раз сам убеждаюсь в пользе этого правила, не рисовать по спутнику в лесу.
dima100 (2017-12-18 10:32:08+00:00): Э, нет... Если пользоваться вашим правилом, большинство грунтовок России никогда не будет нанесено. Не думаю, что это хорошо. Да и проверенная вами дорога уже на следующий день может оказаться непроезжей из-за поваленного дерева. И наоборот. Лично перепилил два дерева этим летом. :-) Что же касается конкретно Усманского бора, то там наносить дороги по снимку в большинстве случаев просто невозможно - их не видно. Так что не нахожу повода для преломления копий...
mavl (2018-12-25 20:43:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
BeKri (2017-11-14 14:28:55+00:00): Hmmm,
dann sollte man dem Geldautomaten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358182439
aber noch irgendwie ein indoor spendieren, weil außen an der Fassade zur Lindwurmstraße gibt es noch einen uneingeschränket zugänglichen.
Gruss der BeKri
k127 (2017-11-14 15:29:19+00:00): Grüß dich BeKri und Danke für den Hinweis! Das ist tatsächlich falsch so. Die Mapzen-Karte von StreetComplete zeigt mir keine POIs an, so wie im Gegensatz dazu die Standard-Mapnik-Tiles in einer hohen Zoom-Stufe. Ich bin deshalb davon ausgegangen, dass der Postbank-Schalter gemeint ist und nicht der Automat an der Lindwurmstraße. Korrigiere ich gleich :)
BeKri (2017-11-14 16:02:43+00:00): Stop ;-))
WELCHER Automat gemeint ist, ist mir selber ned so klar,
von der Plazierung würde ich auf den innen tippen, weil der aussen ist etwas weiter südwestlich Richtung Hausgrenze ... und fehlt im Moment eigentlich
*Martin* (2017-12-07 09:08:24+00:00): Hi piratenz. Your edit is wrong. It is no cave (entrance). Please revert it back.
piratenz (2017-12-07 13:27:42+00:00): Hello Martin - I problably mixed it up. Thanks for keeping an eye on it. http://www.snezna-jama.com/ is a famous cave. About 4 years you changed this point from Snehová jama (something like a shelter?) to snezna jama, which I misunderstood. I reverted tha change leaving a fixme in order to clear the meaning of this mark.
*Martin* (2017-12-07 13:33:22+00:00): "snežná jama" is a shed-like building where a young nursling trees are kept in the snow during winter. I don't know about any suitable tag for it.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:38:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 17:29:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14058803/history has waterway = creek that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=creek? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=creek differs from waterway=stream in this case?
nevw (2024-04-25 20:24:19+00:00): Pullen Reach is a section of the Brisbane River. I can’t find documentation on how to map named waterway reaches and bends in osm. One method would be to split the ‘natural=water + water=river’ polygon along this stretch between the bends and add name=Pullen Reach to it. But as there is already a very large multipolygon named Brisbane River along the length of the river, Pullen Reach would need to be added as a separate polyon.
Best practice would probably be to split the Brisbane River multipolygon here and add lines across the river at each end and use those bits to create a new multipolygon for the reach, thus not having duplicated overlapping lines.
Sometimes reaches and bends have recreation areas along these stretches that also carry the same name but these would be mapped separately from the waterway.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-26 09:18:20+00:00): I would probably use place=locality locality=river_bend (second tag is case of ATYL - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=ATYL )

Or invent a new tag place=river_bend and try to get people to support it

Or ask on official forum ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/ - login with OSM account) whether anyone has a better idea.

Adding water area also may work but...
nevw (2024-05-01 01:34:52+00:00): I added Pullen Reach water area as a multipolygon. The bends are not named along this part of the river as far as I can ascertain so extended reach into the bends as if I was reaching in a sailing boat through the reach. I expect in many rivers the bend would be named (most often as a locality I assume instead of a water area) and the reach would more strictly be confined to only the straightest water section. The Pullen Reach Bushland Reserve was a convenient natural place to confine it at the southern end. Popes Reach is immediately upstream and Two Mile Reach immediately downstream but I didn't map those as haven't old out of copyright maps at hand.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
sander79 (2017-11-14 15:28:47+00:00): Hoi Leo,

waarom heb je 'foot =yes' toegevoegd op de fietspaden ?
Bij default heb je daar rechten op. Zie de volgende wiki pagina
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands

gr,
Sander
Leo Slager (2017-11-14 16:43:16+00:00): Ik vermoedde dat dat de oorzaak was waarom een wandelroute hier onderbroken bleef. Maar inmiddels is duidelijk dat de sortering niet juist was. Het is mij in de afgelopen 2 maanden ook nog niet gelukt om de wiki compleet door te worstelen.
Voorzichtig voorwaarts dus :)
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].