piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TaxusB (2022-04-12 20:26:10+00:00): Hi all,

Thank you for your input. I apologize for the late response. 

I have personally reached out to eerib with the following information. 

I would encourage local editors to reach out to the local and provincial jurisdictions who deal with land management in this area. I have provided the contact information for the entities in which I would suggest you start with at the bottom of this comment.  

Building trails on crown or provincial park land without a permit is illegal in British Columbia. The same goes for lands of British Pacific Properties Ltd.
I have had a chance to reach out and hear back from North Shore Rescue, and they are concerned about illegal trails showing on public maps. Furthering public access to illegally built trails on crown, park, and private land  has been known to contribute to increased frequencies in callouts and near miss situations.

Have you reached out to the federal and provincial jurisdictions who govern and regulate what happens on these lands? I would strongly encourage involving them in this conversation prior to making further edits in the area. Here are a few links I would suggest you start with:

North Shore Rescue https://www.northshorerescue.com/contact/
District of West Vancouver https://westvancouver.ca/contact-us
BC Parks https://bcparks.ca/info/feedback/
British Pacific Properties LTD https://britishproperties.com/
Province of British Columbia (Crown Land and Water Use) https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/crown-land-water/crown-land

Cheers, TaxusB
eerib (2022-04-13 22:10:43+00:00): I went ahead and changed the access from private to permissive in changeset 119687158 after verifying today that the land owner's signs are still up. I used the PMBC Parcel Cadastre to decide what trails are within the BPPL lands and which have an agreement for official public use (Baden Powell, Whyte Lake trails).
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:18:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-30 22:17:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole
user_5359 (2022-03-28 12:46:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9610261496. What is the meaning of /youtu.be/zf1f9oOGO4A?t = 180?
GOwin (2022-03-28 23:44:15+00:00): Looks like a stray paste operation. Thanks for catching.
banana_bender (2022-03-27 11:58:11+00:00): Accidentally requested a review here.
banana_bender (2022-03-27 12:02:04+00:00): Still would appreciate any feedback.
nevw (2022-03-27 14:35:07+00:00): I would prefer that only concrete footways found in urban streets were tagged with highway=footway.
I prefer ways in bush areas such as this were tagged with highway=path plus 
the other usual bush walk tags if useful.

Other than that It looks like you improved the accuracy of the trail by using your gps to good effect.
ivanatora (2022-03-27 07:21:48+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118970561.
Приетият стандарт в OSM за България е пътната мрежа да се класифицира спрямо републиканската пътна мрежа: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria/%D0%9F%D1%8A%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BC%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B0
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-27 07:01:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117626468, 117626470, 117626476, 117626479, 117627513, 117627515, 117690075, 117690085, 117690090, 117690100, 117725840, 117725844, 117725852, 117734029, 117734033, 117734037, 117734041, 117734047, 117734052, 117734055, 117734059, 117734067.
user_5359 (2022-03-27 06:07:40+00:00): wrong change set comment:
correct address notation, correct driveway notation, fix highway / waterway crossing
Dimitar155 (2022-03-27 07:41:51+00:00): Всичко изглежда наред с тази редакция. Единствения ми въпрос е защо сте сложили hgv=no и maxweight=12? Камиони под 12 тона могат ли да минават през тази част на прохода?
user_8101879 (2022-06-01 14:10:58+00:00): Bonjour,

où as tu trouvé cette ligne que je ne trouve pas sur le site star.fr (à Bécherel centre je n'ai trouvé que la ligne 82) ?

Cette relation est actuellement vide (sans aucun membre), ce qui n'est pas normal, cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Empty_relations

Je nettoie régulièrement (tous les 15 jours) les relations vides : cela te laisse donc un peu de temps pour me répondre/corriger cette relation.

Si elle est toujours vide le 15 juin, je la supprimerai.

Si tu as besoin d'aide, n'hésites pas à me demander.

Bien à toi.
Fred
mga_geo (2022-06-09 05:58:44+00:00): Bonjour Fred,
Un certain nombre de lignes de bus avait été prévu par la STAR en lien avec la mise en service de la seconde ligne de métro.
Cette mise en service devait avoir lieu début 2020, elle est toujours attendue ...
Marc
user_8101879 (2022-06-11 14:57:57+00:00): Ok, j'ai ajouté un noeud et une note explicative aux 3 relations pour qu'elles ne soient plus vides et expliquer pourquoi elles ont si peu de membres.
A+
Fred
user_8101879 (2022-06-01 14:18:45+00:00): Bonjour,

où as tu trouvé cette ligne que je ne trouve pas sur le site star.fr (à Saint-Jacques-De-La-Lande je n'ai trouvé que les lignes C6 et 57) ?

Cette relation est actuellement vide (sans aucun membre), ce qui n'est pas normal, cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Empty_relations

Je nettoie régulièrement (tous les 15 jours) les relations vides : cela te laisse donc un peu de temps pour me répondre/corriger cette relation.

Si elle est toujours vide le 15 juin, je la supprimerai.

Si tu as besoin d'aide, n'hésites pas à me demander.

Bien à toi.
Fred
user_8101879 (2022-06-01 14:25:43+00:00): Bonjour,

où as tu trouvé cette ligne que je ne trouve pas sur le site star.fr (je n'ai trouvé que les lignes 11 et 14 passant à Roazhon Park) ?

Cette relation est actuellement vide (sans aucun membre), ce qui n'est pas normal, cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Empty_relations

Je nettoie régulièrement (tous les 15 jours) les relations vides : cela te laisse donc un peu de temps pour me répondre/corriger cette relation.

Si elle est toujours vide le 15 juin, je la supprimerai.

Si tu as besoin d'aide, n'hésites pas à me demander.

Bien à toi.
Fred
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:02:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
ququruzka (2022-03-27 08:19:38+00:00): mapping of military / military related objects is prohibited during rus - Ukrainian war. This decicion was declared by OSM UA team.
cobra13 (2022-03-29 18:48:16+00:00): You are no recognized subject that can issue editing rules in OSM.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 00:53:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 118419157, 118419165, 118419167, 118419172, 118419175, 118419181, 118437604, 118437610, 118437616, 118437622, 118437631, 118437646, 118437658, 118437665, 118437671, 118437681, 118437685, 118437692, 118437700, 118438293, 118438303, 118438310, 118438322, 118438340.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-27 19:26:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118993388 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of deleted highways
EP_Repair (2022-08-11 15:17:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124780086 where the changeset comment is: revert organized attempts to subvert trail networks see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6216
ququruzka (2022-03-27 08:19:50+00:00): mapping of military / military related objects is prohibited during rus - Ukrainian war. This decicion was declared by OSM UA team.
ququruzka (2022-03-27 08:19:59+00:00): mapping of military / military related objects is prohibited during rus - Ukrainian war. This decicion was declared by OSM UA team.
Tomas_J (2022-03-27 14:07:02+00:00): Ak tam cesta fyzicky je, tak by sa nemala mazať ale označit na nej obmedzenie napr. access=private. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate
Tomas_J (2022-03-27 14:09:11+00:00): A sorry, zle som prečítal koment. Ak cesta už neexistuje , výmaz je IMHO v poriadku (ak na ňu nie je naviazané niečo ďalšie, napr relácia).
Filip009 (2022-03-27 19:10:40+00:00): Ak cesta v realite neexistuje súhlasím s jej vymazaním, lenže keďže ju vidno na "satelitných" snímkach, je veľmi pravdepodobné, že ju tam niekto vráti späť.
Keď tam cesta je, ale je nepriechodná (z dôvodu, že ju niekto prehradil prekážkou, napríklad plotom) access=no je postačujúce. Pokiaľ je niekde v jej strede bariéra a kvôli tomu je neprejazdná, tak pridať len bariéru na miesto, kde sa nachádza. Pokiaľ sa po ceste nedá prejsť, pretože je zarastená, tak je na to nejaký tag visibillity https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:visibility ale ja osobne ho nepoužívam, čiže s tým nemám veľa skúseností.
A do budúcnosti, keď napíšete do popisu pri nahrávaní zmien, že update, tak nikto nevie, že ste mal na mysli, že cesta tam už nie je. Keby ste toto napísal na úpravy, ktoré ste robil, nič by som Vám nenapísal ;)
Dodko (2022-06-07 06:38:04+00:00): Zarastená a nepriechodná cesta by sa dala označiť prefixom abandoned:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:P%C5%99edpona_%C5%BEivotn%C3%ADho_cyklu

Tak nebude viditeľná ani funkčná pre navigovanie, ak by ju niekto chcel dokresliť podľa ortofoto tak uvidí že už je nakreslená čiara a ak ju niekto vyseká tak sa len odstráni prefix .
Príklad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056367712
Sanniu (2022-03-28 06:42:32+00:00): Hi
At the north end it overlaps with track road - is this part accessible by cars or that road was replaces by pedestrian/bike only?
Offir (2022-03-28 06:48:00+00:00): The unmaintained track road was replaced by this bike track, it's no longer accessible by cars (I was trying to delete the unmaintained track road points, but couldn't for some reason)
Sanniu (2022-03-28 06:52:42+00:00): Thx, deleted it now.
user_15397587 (2022-03-29 09:32:52+00:00): Hello,
does OSM UA team have any authority on Openstreetmap database?
If so, please provide references to OSM Board related statements.
Thanks.
ivanbranco (2022-03-27 20:25:08+00:00): Hi yusufmert,

I keep noticing some problems in your changesets.

For example you're adding a lot of fictional gardens in Tbilisi. This changeset is just an example of many.

Please read the wiki, a leisure=garden in OSM is: "a distinguishable planned space, usually outdoors, set aside for the display, cultivation, and enjoyment of plants and other forms of nature."

This is not the case, and it's clearly visible from the imagery you used (Maxar Premium Imagery). I think it would be better to delete them (together with the fictional forests you also mapped).

--------------

Here you added an extra relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13970573

it's not needed, this relation was enough: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13970574

I see iD tried to warn you ("warnings:missing_role"), a good practice would be to solve every warning before uploading a changeset in the database.

--------------

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044428178/history

Here you added a layer=-1 without specifying why. It's a building passage? Then the layer=-1 should be replace with "tunnel=building_passage" and added only to the part passing under the building.
ivanbranco (2022-03-27 20:43:02+00:00): Also I saw you used https://maps.gov.ge/ as source in some of your edits. OSM have a strict policy about imports and licenses: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

The only reference I can see about copyright in the Georgian Government website is "© 2014 საქართველოს მთავრობა". Therefore their data is under copyright. Do you have any information (which I didn't find) about that data being open and compatible to OSM or any special permission to use it?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 00:53:45+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 118419157, 118419165, 118419167, 118419172, 118419175, 118419181, 118437604, 118437610, 118437616, 118437622, 118437631, 118437646, 118437658, 118437665, 118437671, 118437681, 118437685, 118437692, 118437700, 118438293, 118438303, 118438310, 118438322, 118438340.
GeorgeKaplan (2026-01-01 17:58:06+00:00): Bonjour,

La rue n'a jamais été réouverte dans OSM depuis ce changeset, pouvez-vous faire la modification inverse maintenant que les travaux sont finis depuis longtemps ?
multimodaal (2022-03-27 19:20:50+00:00): Hoi Dik, ik ben hier vandaag langsgefietst  en het fiets-/bromfietspad langs de rijbaan van de Bospolder ligt er echt nog steeds, de oversteek van de N446 ook. 
*Revert jij de verwijderingen?

De lage resolutie van de Superviewbeelden is soms lastig te interpreteren, snap dat je dacht dat pad wellicht verdwenen was.   In zulke gevallen in de toekomst toch beter om een lokale mapper te vragen een kijkje te nemen of een note te plaatsen.

Foto's zijn ingezonden, zullen over een paar dagen staan op 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?dateFrom=2022-03-01&lat=52.16148436596745&lng=4.55968560757492&z=17.1020211017959

Ook in bestemmingsplan waar het nieuwe pad in is opgenomen is ook het oude fiets-/bromfietspad behouden gebleven: 
Kaarthttps://www.ruimtelijkeplannen.nl/documents/NL.IMRO.0547.BPInfocentrum-VA01/b_NL.IMRO.0547.BPInfocentrum-VA01_Bijlage2.pdf

Groet!
dvdhoven (2022-03-28 05:41:56+00:00): Changeset reverted
multimodaal (2022-03-28 07:04:07+00:00): Dank je!
multimodaal (2022-03-28 19:04:04+00:00): Plaatje van het gister nog aanwezige G12a-pad (-:   https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=268945032110310
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 00:53:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 118419157, 118419165, 118419167, 118419172, 118419175, 118419181, 118437604, 118437610, 118437616, 118437622, 118437631, 118437646, 118437658, 118437665, 118437671, 118437681, 118437685, 118437692, 118437700, 118438293, 118438303, 118438310, 118438322, 118438340.
multimodaal (2022-03-27 19:26:31+00:00): Hoi, waarom heb je die highway=stairs verwijderd? 
Vorige week zag die trap  er nog net zo uit als op deze foto van december:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=329095092366128 

*Revert jij?

Superview is te grof om te bepalen of zulke kleine objecten nog aanwezig zijn, bij twijfel kan je een lokale mapper vragen / een note plaatsen 

Groet!
dvdhoven (2022-03-28 05:43:13+00:00): Changeset reverted
multimodaal (2022-03-28 07:03:46+00:00): Dank je!
felipeeugenio (2022-03-27 16:12:55+00:00): edicion personal y con datos privados
dvdhoven (2022-03-28 05:42:45+00:00): Changeset reverted
ivanbranco (2022-03-27 21:00:31+00:00): Hi sacha001,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790794813/history

"place=Aftab town" is not a valid place value. Could you check it out please?
SomeoneElse (2022-03-27 10:12:34+00:00): The 5 pit trail bit of this isn't signed, but the joined-up way there is the only way you can physically or legally do it by bike.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-27 10:13:23+00:00): (source=local_knowledge on the southern changes, obviously)
janolezab (2022-03-27 10:42:56+00:00): Rövershagen hat aber eine große Umgebung! ;)
Protoxenus (2022-03-27 11:38:58+00:00): Etwa nicht?
JOSM hat sich irgendwie verschluckt und mir angezeigt, dass ein Punkt einen Konflikt verursacht. "Normale" Konfliktlösung hat nicht funktioniert. Ich habe mir den Punkt heruntergeladen, dabei wohl einen Zahlendreher verursacht und dann einen Punkt in Malaysia? bekommen.
GPar (2022-07-16 15:32:47+00:00): ma questa strada esiste? non rilsuta sulle immagini ed è disconnessa da tutte le altre https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950291357#map=15/41.1871/15.1546
Gior7 (2022-07-16 15:37:27+00:00): Ciao, è uno dei tunnel di uscita di sicurezza della futura galleria Hirpinia della Napoli-Bari AV/AC, avrei dovuto metterlo come strada in costruzione
dvdhoven (2022-03-28 05:42:25+00:00): Changeset reverted
Thierry1030 (2024-12-26 11:54:11+00:00): dag erferfref,
dank om mee de fietssnelwegen te helpen mappen.
In samenwerking met de Vlaamse provincies hebben we een tagging model opgesteld. Belangrijk daarin is het gebruik van de tag "state=*"
U heeft de tag state=inuse gebruikt, maar dit gebruiken we niet. Als een fietssnelweg bewegwijzerd is met de typische blauwe borden, dan verdwijnt de "state=*"-tag
In de wiki vindt u alle info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycle_network%3DBE-VLG:cycle_highway
L'imaginaire (2024-12-30 11:21:31+00:00): Nazicht gedaan op 30/12/2024: traject op Aalters grondgebied heeft geen (F-)bewegwijzering.
Thierry1030 (2024-12-30 13:11:07+00:00): dan dient de relatie als state=proposed gemapt te worden
erferfref (2024-12-30 21:10:27+00:00): laat jullie maar lekker gaan jongens
Thierry1030 (2024-12-30 22:02:01+00:00): relatie ondertussen gemapt met state=proposed
abakus_uploader (2022-03-27 22:31:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_9434724 (2022-03-29 17:43:41+00:00): Hello,
can you please explain what your rationale is for removing these landuses? Is there a reason?
------
Здравствуйте,
чи не могли б ви пояснити, чому ви обґрунтовуєте видалення цих тегів? Чи є причина?
user_9434724 (2022-03-29 18:46:32+00:00): Please disregard the above.
lyctkel (2023-12-05 15:19:58+00:00): Hi Rom1,
sorry to write again. I'm cleaning up https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/recycling%3Aglass_bottles#values and found another one.
You wrote recycling:glass_bottles=275 A.
I guess it's recycling:glass_bottles=yes again.
Greetings,
lyctkel
Rom1 (2023-12-05 15:24:56+00:00): Corrected. Thanks !
jengelh (2022-03-31 17:57:47+00:00): Das war aber Mist: wieso ist way 1036770747 "Pp Stammheim" (anscheinend kurz für Polizeiposten) als riesige commercial-Fläche markiert?
okilimu (2022-04-02 04:25:54+00:00): Ich habe lediglich einen Punkt von der Fläche, der mit einer administrativen Grenze verbunden war, gelöst und der Punkt war überflüssig, weil ohne auch gerade Linie.
Ich habe also überhaupts am Tagging gemacht. Bitte erst prüfen, WAS gemacht wurde und dann unfreundlich ansprechen, bitte
Grüße
Farfetch'd (2022-03-27 11:19:08+00:00): granica działki =/= terenowi szkoły
Teren szkoły jest ogrodzony. Właścicielem działki jest gmina, szkoła jedynie dzierżawi część tej działki.
Przestań tworzyć edycje o miejscach, o których nie masz pojęcia.
user_14117678 (2022-03-27 12:54:39+00:00): Nie dodajesz ŻADNEGO ogrodzenia. Poprawnie oznaczyłem obszar szkoły, nie rozumiem, czemu tak bardzo zależy Ci na tych wandalizmach, które ciągle dodajesz.
Pierce (2022-04-28 09:41:09+00:00): Hi Leon,
There’s a bit to unpack here, but you’ve created roads that don’t exist that should be marked as such, I’d suggest looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Construction and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed to see how to go about this correctly.
The other thing of note (pun intended) that you have been labelling locations as “Future…” which is not the location’s name, and is a note tag. Tag accurately, not for cosmetics.
Leon K (2022-04-28 10:11:51+00:00): Hi, fair point on the construction tags, that was an oversight.   
I've also changed the name to Spirit of Tasmania Quay as that is what the geelongport site is referring to it as.
ElliottPlack (2022-04-14 03:14:33+00:00): Thanks. This relation is growing a bit unwieldy
jospyck (2022-03-28 07:29:40+00:00): Hallo, erg fijn dat jullie Pin je punt opgepikt hebben bij Toerisme Ronse. Heel veel succes gewenst bij het mappen van toeristische POI's in de toekomst!
Jos Pyck
Toerisme Vlaanderen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118976472
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 00:53:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 118419157, 118419165, 118419167, 118419172, 118419175, 118419181, 118437604, 118437610, 118437616, 118437622, 118437631, 118437646, 118437658, 118437665, 118437671, 118437681, 118437685, 118437692, 118437700, 118438293, 118438303, 118438310, 118438322, 118438340.
user_5359 (2022-03-28 12:48:46+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044451428. What is the meaning of the tag 09142492622 = 09142492622. Did you mean phone = 09142492622?
Cristoffs (2022-03-28 16:40:45+00:00): Wszystko ładnie tylko schemat oznaczania, który stosujesz nigdy nie spotkał się z przyjęciem i od 2016 jest martwy. Nie jestem pewien czy warto to w ten sposób oznaczać.
pio2_122 (2022-03-28 16:59:38+00:00): Zdaje sobie z tego sprawę.
W zasadzie, w tych przypadkach można by w ogóle usunąć adresy (niezależnie od metody tagowania), ponieważ te POI leżą w obrębie budynków z adresami, więc „Nominatim przy wyszukiwaniu POI i tak zwróci adres budynku” (źródło: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=815542#p815542).

Tutaj postanowiłem zastosować ten schemat, ponieważ widzę, że podczas dodawania aptek w ramach projektu #helpua_osmp maperzy "usilnie" dodają do nich adresy (i to prosto z bazy csioz, a więc niekiedy z zapisem nazw ulic niepokrywającym się z tym, co jest w OSM). Więc, aby zachować z jakiegoś powodu dodawane adresy, ale jednocześnie nie dublować ich - zastosowałem ten schemat.

Oczywiście, jak wspomniałem na początku, nie ma problemu, aby zupełnie usunąć adresy z tych POI.
maraf24 (2022-03-28 19:07:54+00:00): Ja w takich sytuacjach (prawidłowy adres na budynku, ale nie na POI) adres usuwam, a nie poprawiam.
Schemat contact:* stosuję do adresów kontaktowych (mail address). Tak to zresztą na wiki jest opisane - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact
maraf24 (2022-03-27 17:08:58+00:00): Proszę o prawidłowe opisywanie zestawów zmian, np. tutaj "dodanie parkingów przy drodze".
DaveF (2022-03-27 15:45:10+00:00): Hi
Where did you get your data from?
Do you have a link?

There are multiple 'LCA 15' footpaths
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1hb6

They need to be distinguished by their full refs as supplied the the relevant local authorities.
patthoyts (2022-03-27 19:36:32+00:00): The exported data from south gloucs council. Mostly via https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/south-gloucs/-/cold-ashton/ but also imported into QGIS. The council footpath prow_ref do not include the sub-section number. That's part of the key in the export data (visible in QGIS). I know the SGC online map has the sub-section (keyid) parts being shown.
Cristinelandongan (2022-11-12 13:35:13+00:00): Pls delete this . Pretty Eyes Cebu relocate to other place.
vojtechzaboril (2022-04-03 14:43:13+00:00): Dobrý den,
označení trunk se používá pro směrově dělené komunikace, viz. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk
Pro označení SMV slouží tag motorroad=*. Pokud si s něčím nebudete vědět rady, zkuste hledat na wiki.
Vaše změny tedy vracím zpět.
S pozdravem
V
vojtechzaboril (2022-04-03 14:45:43+00:00): Popř. ještě tady: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:%C4%8Cesko/Zna%C4%8Den%C3%AD_silnic