piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BeKri (2016-11-18 15:06:59+00:00): Servus,
Kleine Frage: Was veranlasst Dich, die Schulstraße 14a wieder in 14 a umzubenennen ?
Wie in
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/114461718 zu sehen, war es schon 2* 14a, wie es für München richtig ist, auch in der offiziellen Nummernliste, die uns von der Stadt München zur Verfügung steht siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37918654
Gruss und mit der Bitte um kurz Klarstellung
derBeKri
beweta (2016-11-25 16:54:12+00:00): Da habe ich München wohl mit meiner Heimat Regensburg verwechselt. ;(

In Regensburg schreibt man laut amtlicher Karte[1] Hausnummern mit Leerzeichen.

[1] https://geoportal.bayern.de/bayernatlas/index.html?X=5429556.00&Y=4506150.00&zoom=14&lang=de&topic=ba&bgLayer=atkis&catalogNodes=122
BeKri (2016-11-26 12:20:59+00:00): Alles klar,
leider ist die Hausnummerierung eine regional "sehr gewachsene" Sache.
Mit/ohne Lehrzeichen, Groß/Kleinbuchstaben, Brüche und anderes.
Bleim ma in München bei "ohne Leerzeichen und kleinen Buchstaben" (bis auf Ausnahmen)
Gruss derBeKri
beweta (2016-11-26 13:00:57+00:00): Wo bleibt eine DIN-Norm, wenn man sie braucht? DIN 5008 gilt nur für Briefe.
BeKri (2016-11-26 14:39:25+00:00): Naja,
DIN gibt's seit 1917,
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konskriptionsnummer
(als Vorläufer) sind schon etwas älter ...
Sonst gäbe es garantiert eine NORM ;o)))
chillly (2016-11-24 11:14:32+00:00): Another poorly researched, plonked school. The address has the wrong city and the wrong street.
Christian Ledermann (2016-11-25 18:15:15+00:00): This is the  Edubase data => http://www.education.gov.uk/edubase/establishment/summary.xhtml?urn=133640 
what is wrong with it?
Christian Ledermann (2016-11-25 18:17:12+00:00): https://www.google.co.uk/maps/uv?hl=en&pb=!1s0x4878bec668937053:0x902b73bd76ebe0a2!2m16!2m2!1i80!2i80!3m1!2i20!16m10!1b1!2m2!1m1!1e1!2m2!1m1!1e3!2m2!1m1!1e4!3m1!7e115!4s/maps/place/Horton%2BHouse%2BSchool/@53.8104354,-0.3375758,3a,75y,56.66h,90t/data%3D*213m4*211e1*213m2*211sa2b-2mXtEfyDdeRtK67mHw*212e0*214m2*213m1*211s0x0:0x902b73bd76ebe0a2!5sHorton+House+School+-+Google+Search&imagekey=!1e2!2sa2b-2mXtEfyDdeRtK67mHw&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj90rfRucTQAhUG0hoKHQ8RDvgQpx8IcjAK
chillly (2016-11-25 18:22:13+00:00): The street address is Sutton Road, not the farm name. The city is Wawne, not Hull. If the addr:city is Hull, then all the addresses in the city use Kingston upon Hull, not Hull. The school is clearly in Wawne not Hull - the UA boundary is very clearly in view. 

I have made these changes.
Christian Ledermann (2016-11-25 18:24:52+00:00): thanks :-)
j-wills (2016-11-17 13:18:45+00:00): Не пишите название в кавычках! В поисковике же ковычки писать не будете.
И не надо дублировать тип точки в названии, то есть в типе "гостиница" писать Гостиница "Зарянка"
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:31:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
marczoutendijk (2016-11-16 20:18:46+00:00): Let op: maps.me is een slechte editor voor het bewerken van de kaart omdat niet alle onderdelen goed kunnen worden benoemd.
Ik heb bv. name:nl weer verwijderd, want dat is al opgesloten in de name.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
marczoutendijk (2016-11-16 20:24:57+00:00): En ook heb ik de gegevens samengevoegd op de adresnode om overbodige gegevens te vermijden.
mueschel (2016-11-20 13:18:42+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier sehr viele Tags verwendet, die sonst nirgends in Verwendung sind. Diese tags mögen eine gute Beschreibung der Objekte sein, sind für OSM aber nicht wirklich zu gebrauchen - keine Software ist in der Lage sie zu verstehen und entsprechend darzustellen. 
Am besten schaust du dich etwas im Wiki um oder vergleichst mit ähnlichen Objekten in der Umgebung. Oder du kommst im OSM Forum vorbei, wo dir gerne weitergeholfen wird.

Viel Spaß mit OSM,
Jan
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
literan (2016-11-17 11:12:56+00:00): Вот на этой точке https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4504959072 вы поставили взаимоисключающие теги - access=no (доступ для абсолютно всех запрещен, даже для охранников - обычно это значит, что ворота заварены) и motor_vehicle=yes + foot=yes (что означает, что доступ практически для всех, ну, кроме велосипедистов, разрешен). Навигатор сойдет с ума.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:31:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
glglgl (2016-11-17 08:40:07+00:00): Thank you for changing three objects in three different corners of the world and thus creating a changeset spanning literally the whole world.
cdavila (2016-11-17 10:09:55+00:00): What problem do you see with that?
glglgl (2016-11-17 10:14:06+00:00): Well, it spans the whole world. More than 99,99% of the area covered by it is not really affected by it. List the changes in America, Europe, Asia, Africa and you will see this changeset nearly everywhere.

Partially, it is a flaw in OpenStreetmap to display it in this way, but it can be avoided by creating separate changesets.
cdavila (2016-11-17 10:30:45+00:00): OK
Tyanna Eaton (2016-11-28 17:20:59+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG Ground Survey 2016.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
SomeoneElse (2016-12-04 22:21:51+00:00): Just for info - I've nudged the school here north so that it matches the imagery once it's been aligned with the local GPS traces.
Christian Ledermann (2016-12-05 10:30:51+00:00): thanks :-)
Tyanna Eaton (2016-11-28 17:20:42+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG Ground Survey 2016.
streckenkundler (2016-11-23 17:32:19+00:00): Hei.

denkst du auch noch an dieses Changeset hier?  

Danke...

Dann kann ich das als erledigt markieren.

Sven
oderplantscher (2016-11-24 11:27:29+00:00): Mach ich. Wird aber erst was am Wochenende.
oderplantscher (2016-11-25 15:57:40+00:00): Umrisse wurden gelöscht und werden zeitnah durch BingSat-Umrisse ersetzt. (43947381).
literan (2017-01-10 18:14:16+00:00): пруды в здание школы превратились https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1285019/history#map=17/55.90199/37.60598 - знал бы на что поправить, поправил бы )
Alexander-II (2017-01-10 18:17:30+00:00): Ого. Это я подправлю. Там болотистая местность вокруг прудов. Такой там естественный заросший водоем.
Alexander-II (2017-01-10 18:21:33+00:00): Похоже на то, что я хотел перенести тэги с линий полигона на отношение мультиполигона. И из буфера скопировал от школы.
wmyrda (2016-11-17 12:29:28+00:00): To fakt, że dodałem zlikwidowany obiekt niemniej dlatego miał on również tag abandoned=yes oznaczający opuszczony. O ile wiem w tym miejscu nie powstało nic nowego także teren kwalifikował się jako opuszczony/wojskowy. Jego wyświetlanie się na mapie jako obecnie wojskowy jest raczej błędem sposobu wyświetlania na mapie, które należało by poprawić zgłaszając stosowny błąd na https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues niż usuwać go w całości. Ewentualnie usunął bym jedynie sam tag landuse=military a obrys pozostawił tak by w przyszłości gdy wyświetlanie zostanie poprawione nie musieć ponownie wytyczać tego obszaru.
wmyrda (2016-11-17 12:41:44+00:00): hmmm tak szukam i brak jest faktycznie jednoznacznej odpowiedzi. Znalazłem jedynie https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/newbies/2010-December/006195.html które sugeruje, że faktycznie należało usunąć...
wmyrda (2016-11-17 13:04:01+00:00): Zobaczymy zdania innych. Zadałem pytanie na ten temat na forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618357#p618357
Tyanna Eaton (2016-11-28 17:20:21+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG Ground Survey 2016.
Sander H (2016-11-28 17:04:37+00:00): Hoi Sven,
Je hebt, ongetwijfeld per ongeluk, een error veroorzaakt bij deze weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242844777
Bij een destination:lanes is het de bedoeling dat alle rijstroken hun eigen destination hebben en deze heb je er in deze changeset afgesloopt.
marczoutendijk (2016-11-28 18:46:50+00:00): En misschien kan Sven ook iets duidelijker zijn met zijn changeset commentaar ipv: "(geen reactie)". Het blijft anders maar raden wat hij aan het doen is.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
BCNorwich (2016-11-24 09:20:49+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've joined your new path to the rest of the highway system. As it was the path wasn't linked to anywhere, so therefore pretty useless. Joined up routers can use it to guide folk.
Regards
DC0 (2016-11-26 13:10:35+00:00): This was my first edit, thank you for linking it up! Looks great.
Nakaner-repair (2016-11-19 10:36:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43795258 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 43683459 to 43713654 which copied addresses and/or street names from Bayernatlas ATIKS. (CS 43683459 did not name Bayernatlas as source but I strongly suspect it)
ma-rt-in (2017-04-28 09:34:40+00:00): Hi, habe gerade bemerkt, das du im diesem Bereich sehr viel über korrigiert hast, passe gerade das ganze nochmal an.
Nakaner-repair (2016-11-19 10:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43795258 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 43683459 to 43713654 which copied addresses and/or street names from Bayernatlas ATIKS. (CS 43683459 did not name Bayernatlas as source but I strongly suspect it)
user_5359 (2016-11-17 09:25:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! There isn’t any highway to this property!
Baconcrisp (2016-11-17 23:47:23+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG 2016
Nakaner-repair (2016-11-19 10:36:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43795258 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 43683459 to 43713654 which copied addresses and/or street names from Bayernatlas ATIKS. (CS 43683459 did not name Bayernatlas as source but I strongly suspect it)
Baconcrisp (2016-11-17 23:46:34+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG 2016
Firefishy (2016-11-16 22:07:37+00:00): Great first contribution. Any additional local knowledge greatly appreciated. Spread the word ;-)
Firefishy (2016-11-16 22:09:24+00:00): PS: Our coverage of Mosques is not very good, would be great expanding.
Nakaner-repair (2016-11-19 10:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43795258 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 43683459 to 43713654 which copied addresses and/or street names from Bayernatlas ATIKS. (CS 43683459 did not name Bayernatlas as source but I strongly suspect it)
Nakaner-repair (2016-11-19 10:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43795258 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 43683459 to 43713654 which copied addresses and/or street names from Bayernatlas ATIKS. (CS 43683459 did not name Bayernatlas as source but I strongly suspect it)
Nakaner-repair (2016-11-19 10:36:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43795258 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 43683459 to 43713654 which copied addresses and/or street names from Bayernatlas ATIKS. (CS 43683459 did not name Bayernatlas as source but I strongly suspect it)
Baconcrisp (2016-11-17 23:45:43+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG 2016
Nakaner-repair (2016-11-19 10:36:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43795258 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 43683459 to 43713654 which copied addresses and/or street names from Bayernatlas ATIKS. (CS 43683459 did not name Bayernatlas as source but I strongly suspect it)
Baconcrisp (2016-11-17 23:45:09+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG 2016
DavidKewley (2016-11-17 01:34:22+00:00): Woolsies, why did you delete this house, which appears in Bing and had address tags? -David
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 23:40:17+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44672182.
Blimp (2017-10-26 09:26:35+00:00): Hi Martin!
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444291048#map=17/51.57237/7.33967 erscheint mir definitiv kein Radweg zu sein, bin da vor ein paar Tagen auf Radausflug hergefahren. M.m.n ist das eher hw=path; foot + bicycle=yes....?
Magst da noch mal drüber schauen warum das als Radweg erfasst ist? LG, Blimp
Martin Borsje (2017-10-26 09:42:01+00:00): Hello,
Answer in English as my German writing would contain errors ('die Fälle')

I did not tag it as cycleway; so if it is not then you can change it yourself into path.

What I might have done is remove bicycle=yes from the path as this is default access for a path/cycleway.
For a path default access bicycle and foot = yes, in Netherlands (where I live) for cycleway default access for biccycle and foot = yes, for Germany default access for foot on cycleway in not yes I understand.

M.fr.Gr.

Martin
DavidKewley (2016-11-17 01:28:01+00:00): Woolsies, why did you delete these houses, which appear in Bing imagery and had address data associated with them? -David
poornibadrinath (2016-11-17 05:25:35+00:00): Hi Woolsies,
  I came across your edits and noticed you have deleted buildings that are very clearly seen in the imagery. Please note deleting the data added by another member without any verifiable reason is not accepted. I am reverting this changeset to recover the deleted buildings. Please make sure to always verify before deleting anything from the map. 
Thank you,
Poornima Badrinath
anieto (2016-12-06 23:04:24+00:00): Creo que se te ha ido la mano con esta edición :P 
Además hay una nota comentándolo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/785299
dan980 (2016-11-17 14:23:56+00:00): Ciao, benvenuti su Openstreetmap! La denominazione bilingue o meno dei Comuni Sardi è oggetto di una futura votazione sulla Wiki. Sarebbe meglio lasciare i nomi bilingue finché la comunità non decide in merito. Ti lascio link alla discussione e al wiki: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Sardinian-vs-Italian-names-Una-pagina-sul-wiki-per-decidere-td5882160.html https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Arcanma/Sandbox
SomeoneElse (2016-11-17 20:11:13+00:00): Hello,
I've changed this back in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43742170 .  The reason why was because names in Sardinia had been subject to a "tit for tat" series of changes (which you can see from the high version numbers of the objects in this changeset).  In 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2016-September/054885.html I explained that further changes would be changed back, and the names kept as they were while the discussion continues.
This is your first edit to OpenStreetMap, so please don't be disheartened - there are lots of things that you can add to the map, both in Sardinia and beyond.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
GBicozzo (2016-11-21 19:18:39+00:00): ciao ho visto la discussione e ho letto quello che e' stato scritto. Penso che i nomi dovrebbero rimanere quelli ufficiali italiani, perché non c'e' motivo e nemmeno accordo di lasciare questi bilingui. Percio' sarebbe meglio lasciare quelli italiani in attesa della votazione, che mi sembra di capire non e' nemmeno iniziata.
dan980 (2016-11-21 20:19:41+00:00): altri utenti pensano che i nomi debbano essere bilingue (legge 482/1999, cartelli bianchi bilingue onnipresenti all'entrata dei centri abitati, ecc.) altri no, a quel punto inizia un ping-pong di edit e revert. Non è proprio il caso, a prescindere dal merito della questione. L'accordo è di lasciare i nomi i nomi bilingue come sono (da oltre due anni) e fare modifiche solo dopo un accordo in merito.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 20:23:04+00:00): No, that won't work, because someone on Sardinia will say "I think the names should remain Sardo/Italian, like there were before".  The "current choice of name" was simply based on what was mapped at the time the DWG intervened in the edit war; it's for the local community to decide what the names should be.  Please take part in the ongoing discussion.  I'll change this back, if you try and change them again you'll be blocked (and any sock-puppet accounts, likewise).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
Nakaner-repair (2016-11-19 10:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43795258 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 43683459 to 43713654 which copied addresses and/or street names from Bayernatlas ATIKS. (CS 43683459 did not name Bayernatlas as source but I strongly suspect it)
Baconcrisp (2016-11-17 23:44:47+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG 2016
literan (2016-11-17 11:08:43+00:00): не надо в сотый раз дублировать. Карты не обновляете... Откатываю
literan (2016-11-17 11:06:58+00:00): не надо писать слово "аптека" в название. И если вы не можете скорректировать все поля нормально (сайт и т.п.), лучше не делайте, а поставьте заметку - другие отработают.
dcapillae_old (2016-12-31 17:40:06+00:00): ¡Hola, Abián!

He estado trabajando en la traducción de algunos artículos relativos a la colaboración entre Wikipedia y OSM para darlos a conocer entre la comunidad hispana de OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colaboraci%C3%B3n_con_Wikipedia. El potencial de enlazar datos del mapa con información de Wikipedia y Commons a través de Wikidata es prácticamente ilimitado.

Todo lo relacionado con Wikimedia y sus proyectos está clasificado bajo la categoría https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:ES:Wikimedia en la versión en español del wiki de OSM.
Baconcrisp (2016-11-17 23:44:07+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG 2016
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:31:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:34:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
mapping man (2016-11-17 08:53:10+00:00): Would it have been better to mark the road as closed instead of removing it completely?  The road is still there, it has been bollared to stop traffic.
Toyota Nexus7 (2016-11-20 19:29:14+00:00): Hi,
Reverted the deletion and amended appropriately. Thanks for the advice.
mapping man (2016-11-21 21:27:54+00:00): No worries.  I did the same thing for Bamburgh Gate under the V1 at Kingsmead.  The road is there but it is blocked with a gate at one end and a sewage pipe at the other.  Marking the  road as blocked stops routing applications from including in their routes.  

I wonder when they will decide to do something with the layout at Grafton Street?  It looks awful.
Baconcrisp (2016-11-17 23:43:48+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG 2016
Baconcrisp (2016-11-17 23:43:27+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG 2016
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
Baconcrisp (2016-11-17 23:43:03+00:00): Edits in Kuwait. KG 2016
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618