piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_242798 (2017-01-08 10:05:16+00:00): Hi Robbie,

Goed bezig!
Jij voegt layer=1 toe aan een bridge.
Want weliswaar is een ontbrekende layer op een bridge pas echt fout als een highway een waterway kruist en niet als een highway een natural=water kruist, maar:
als een volgende mapper een kanoroute toevoegt en dus waterways toevoegt dan ontstaan er alsnog tientallen fouten waar layer op een bridge ontbreekt.
Dus heel goed dat jij dit consequent altijd toevoegt!
Maar mag ik je deze dan ook nog aanraden?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
Showing a bridge incorrectly meeting a non-bridge at a junction (left), and terminated early (right).
Dus een bridge loopt niet door tot op de kruising van wegen.
Het ziet er niet uit op de kaart én het is hierdoor (soms) onduidelijk of een weg (fietspad) onder de brug doorgaat of dat je hier óók de brug op kunt.
Ook: als ik op de kruisende weg rijd, dan rijd ik niet over de brug. Ik raak deze zelfs niet.
Nogmaals: goed bezig. Het kan alleen altijd nog beter...
Aggregaat02 (2017-01-08 10:29:48+00:00): Dat is fijn om te horen :)
mavl (2016-10-08 14:41:46+00:00): Hello, Stereo. What wrong with way?  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372411024/history  
You wrote "Simplified multipolygons." Why?  
If something is marked as multipolygon, then it's ok.
Stereo (2016-10-10 20:13:48+00:00): Hello mavl,

Thank you very much for your message. It's always interesting to think about mapping practice.

Before my edit, there were 28 multipolygon relations, many of them consisting of only outer ways.

After turning these into areas, and using big inner islands to contain groups of landuses inside the forest, this is down to 3. Relation 103843 is down from 55 to 34 members.

Simple polygons should be preferred to multipolygons:

- It goes against common usage: mappers are used to using closed ways for, say, landuse=farmyard when it can be traced as a simple polygon.

- It makes editing tedious and error-prone: I know the changeset area well, but found it [through the osmose QA tool's multipolygon checker](http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?country=luxembourg&item=1170). Have you tried editing one of these big relations we have in Luxembourg, in iD or JOSM?

- It makes the data hard to understand and process. There are many edge cases if you start mapping everything like this, and different renderers understand multipolygons differently.

I'd be interested to hear what you think.

Guillaume
mavl (2016-10-11 17:42:32+00:00): Thank you so much for your answer.  
  
«there were 28 multipolygon relations, many of them consisting of only outer ways»  
Maybe, the contributor has not finished work yet.  
  
I have looked the data in iD and in JOSM. It looks as in other places of a planet (as usually). If we have a lot data then we can make a mistake easy (with multipolygons, with ways with the big number of the common nodes).  
  
I believe that the simplification of the data is an element of data degradation. Multipolygons exist for a long time and it is used by people and programs successfully.  
  
- «It goes against common usage: mappers are used to using closed ways»  
It is subjective criterion. There are people which use multipolygons.  
  
- «It makes editing tedious and error-prone»  
Also subjective criterion.  
  
- «It makes the data hard to understand and process»  
Also subjective criterion.  

I think that if the data exist without errors, then we should not edit them for simplification.  
  
OpenStreetMap stands on one place when one contributor creates the data, but another contributor simplifies it.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 10:25:23+00:00): Hello lilnoblefence

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap many years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446022701 was edited here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.

If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SOSM (2016-10-20 09:20:07+00:00): Ist die Andreasstrasse in Oerlikon tatsächlich ein footway? Nach Luftbild hat es eindeutig Autos die die Strasse befahren.
user_3012156 (2016-10-20 11:48:12+00:00): Die Andreastrasse ist zwischen der Thurgauerstrasse (Emil Frey) und der Aubrücke definitiv ein footway. Die Andreastrasse wird nur noch als Feuerwehrzufahrt benutzt. An der Ecke Thurgauerstrasse / Andreastrasse gibt es auch eine Schranke, damit die Strasse nicht befahren werden kann. Vor dem Messeparkhaus gibt es Poller und auf der Seite Siewerdtstrasse hinter dem Hallenstadion ist eine Zufahrt ebenfalls nicht möglich. Das war früher mal anders, kann mich aber nicht mehr genau erinnern, was damals erlaubt war und was nicht. Ich weiss nicht was Du für eine Karte benutzt hast, aber auf Google Maps und auf Orthofoto 2014 bis 2016 (GIS Browser / Zürimap) sind keine Fahrzeuge zu sehen.
SOSM (2016-10-20 15:19:47+00:00): Ich meinte eher die Seite wo die Andreasstrasse 17 etc ist (also Thurgauerstrasse stadteinwärts rechts): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42673003#map=19/47.41312/8.54875
user_3012156 (2016-10-20 16:58:43+00:00): Dort ist es so, das man rund 10 Meter von der Thurgauerstrasse her in die Andreastrasse hineinfahren kann (auch als Einfahrt zur Emil Frey). Danach steht dort eine Fahrverbotstafel auf der rechten Seite. Sieht man auch auf Google Streetview ;-) Das dort Fahrzeuge stehen, kann auch damit im Zusammenhang stehen, weil die SBB weiter oben den Andreasturm baut. Vielleicht haben die eine Ausnahmegenehmigung. Es kann auch man sein das ein Lieferant dort hineinfährt, was ich schon gesehen habe. Aber Fahrverbot ist nun mal Fahrverbot und daher auch die Anpassung
user_3012156 (2016-10-20 16:59:22+00:00): übrigens sieht man auf Google Maps keine Fahrzeuge ;-)
Supaplex (2016-10-06 04:48:13+00:00): 重覆標示了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411890573
需要合併
Mirasolera (2017-07-07 12:59:52+00:00): Hola Senor Zorrilla. Es su casa privado? Entonces mejor lo remuves de este mapa. Porque no es para informacion personal... Pero si tienes el numero de la casa y la calle lo puedes mappear. Por ejemplo como aqui: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110719921 con addr:city etc. Gracias:-)
user_5359 (2016-10-06 04:28:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you seee the same name on the property https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158936277 . This is the right place.
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:42:47+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:42:54+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
naoliv (2016-10-12 23:22:36+00:00): Roberto, o limte da Estrada Dom João Néri é de 65 km/h mesmo?
Carnildo (2016-10-06 05:39:31+00:00): Is there really a traffic signal there, or did you mis-mark a railroad crossing?
mueschel (2016-10-09 16:54:50+00:00): Hi,
could you check this area again? Looks like several of the islands got flooded:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445857480#map=14/24.5132/89.7487

The reason seems to be this relation, where the roles of the members do not match:
http://osm.org/relation/6628885

Cheers, Jan
SomeoneElse (2017-03-11 21:57:56+00:00): Also,
Tagging http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445462657 as a "village green" is surely wrong.
Best Regards,
Andy
dcapillae_old (2017-05-07 19:55:27+00:00): Hi, andi! Hospital Noble (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193771170) is not a hospital. It was a hospital in the past, but today it has administrative purposes. Here are the City Hall's offices dedicated to environment: http://www.malaga.eu/ayto/temas/portal/seccion_0009
andi9876 (2017-05-08 07:33:34+00:00): Ah, thanks, edited already.
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:45:36+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:50:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
lancetermiteandpestcontrol (2016-11-01 08:34:48+00:00): My data is genuine and i am real user
MKnight (2016-10-06 16:06:53+00:00): Moin, hier is irgendwas komisch, 2 Gebäude übereinander mit unterschiedlichen Dächern?
Das obere Gebäude hat keine Etagen?
Hast Du ein Foto von dem Gebäude?

Ich vermute, dass es am besten wäre eine building-outline drumzuziehen und die übereinanderliegenden als building:part zu taggen
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:50:11+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Gumeg (2016-11-16 09:38:58+00:00): Название этой улицы вы откуда узнали? Новость я видел, но нигде не видел как точно её назовут, я думал что она "улица Алексея Павлова".
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:49:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:49:47+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse (2016-10-11 14:49:52+00:00): Is there really a community centre at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42676680 called Reading Market?  It's a while since I've been to Reading but I don't remember it.
Romainbou (2016-10-06 14:42:40+00:00): Hey! It seems that you build by mistake a huge building, covering the entire area. See the standard map at zoom around 13 and everything is grey as a building.
It seems that it is this polygon being wrong : http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445853515 and another one to the west next to it.
Can you fix it by yourself please, maybe it represents data that you need to keep. If you want I can do it myself.
Cheers.
Athalis (2016-10-06 15:38:05+00:00): FYI: the way was added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42647733 and I cleaned that changeset up
SomeoneElse (2016-10-11 14:45:19+00:00): Hello,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4433875998 really a tourist attraction called "Smelly Ally"?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:49:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:49:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
AR88 (2016-10-06 08:29:09+00:00): natürlich Gebäude eingezeichnet, keinen Sportplatz.
Commodoortje (2016-10-06 10:02:39+00:00): Hoi Arjan,

Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Ik heb je bijdrage een klein beetje aangepast. Er vanuit gaande dat je hiermee kunt instemmen.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:49:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
aceman444 (2016-10-08 21:19:30+00:00): Dobry den, ak je ta cast Hornozoborskej sukromna, ako ste to vyznacili? 'permissive' znamena, ze tam aj tak mozu ist vsetky motorove vozidla. Je to naozaj tak? Nechceli ste motor_vehicle=private? Aka je tam presne znacka?
slymarekivan (2016-10-14 11:30:12+00:00): Znčka hovorí: "Súkromný pozemok"
aceman444 (2016-10-19 19:24:24+00:00): Aha, tak potom tam asi nemozu ani chodci. Dal by som tam access=private (vsetky sposoby dopravy).
Commodoortje (2016-10-06 10:10:10+00:00): Hoi Gronald,
.
Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Kun je bevestigen dat de busstop iets noordelijker aan de verkeerde kant van de weg staat?
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
hatul (2022-02-21 19:31:12+00:00): מה המקור שחניון לילה הפיתול בתשלום לקבוצות?
בכל מקרה, אני לא חושב ש־fee=groups היא תגית חוקית 😄
zstadler (2022-02-21 20:29:26+00:00): אם אני מיפיתי את זה, אז זה לפי השילוט במקום.

אין דבר כזה "לא חוקי"
העובדה היא שהבנת בדיוק למה הכוונה

למה מחקת את התגית?
q_un_go (2016-10-06 10:52:54+00:00): Und wo quert man nun die Gleise zwischen den Bahnsteigen?
user_4473763 (2016-10-08 10:05:34+00:00): das was ich als fußgängerzone dargestellt habe,dort quert man.vielleicht gibt es jeweils am anderen ende der haltestelle noch eine straßenüberquerung,muß noch mal schauen,im nördlichen teil war ja noch baustelle
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:43:00+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
kartler175 (2016-12-04 11:55:52+00:00): From https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446073981 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5211396 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/296838 is not a right turn but a left turn.
alphensebezorger (2016-10-31 19:32:53+00:00): This appears to be another automated edit (JOSM search & replace?). Was this discussed with the community? On which platform?
Aggregaat02 (2016-10-31 20:08:15+00:00): Ik heb de fietspaden allemaal langsgelopen op de kaart. Ik heb onzinnige tags verwijderd zoals bicycle=yes en motor_vehicle=no op een highway=cycleway.
Aggregaat02 (2016-10-31 20:08:52+00:00): Ik heb de fietspaden dus wel allemaal nagelopen.
alphensebezorger (2016-10-31 20:50:06+00:00): Dus deze wegen heb je ook bekeken?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404752835 (mag dankzij jouw wijziging niet meer gefietst worden)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164327119 (mag dankzij jou nu wel door motorvoertuigen gebruikt worden).
En waarom verwijder je ook segregated en source tags? Realiseer je je dat andere mappers de moeite hebben genomen om dit vast te leggen op OSM? Voordat je hun werk domweg wist, kun je tenminste even met ze overleggen.
Aggregaat02 (2016-10-31 21:58:37+00:00): Ik heb de linkjes bekeken. De bovenste klopt, dat is mijn fout, die heb ik hersteld.
De 2e link is een highway=cycleway, dat zegt al genoeg: geen auto's, maar wél fietsen. Die twee tags zijn dus overbodig. Op een highway=cycleway hoeven niet nog eens de tags bicycle=yes en motor_vehicle=no: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/164327119
alphensebezorger (2016-11-01 18:00:15+00:00): 1. En de source en segregated tags? Heb je die ook al teruggezet?

2. Mijn tweede linkje heeft een tag access=yes, daardoor zijn de verstekwaarden voor cycleway niet meer van toepassing. Dan is daarna motor_vehicle=no dus zeker nuttig.

3. Dit waren zo maar twee voorbeelden van de gevolgen van het ondoordacht wissen van bicycle=yes. Er zijn er nog meer, maar ik ben niet van plan stuk voor stuk alle wegen voor jou te gaan controleren. Het is niet mijn wijzigingenset ten slotte. Als jij het niet zorgvuldig naloopt. is het volgens mij een mechanical edit.
sly (2016-12-19 11:25:09+00:00): Bonjour Rinaldum,

Je vois que vous avez ajouté des chalets avec Maps.me mais je ne sais pas si c'est le logiciel dont la traduction est mal faite, mais dans OpenstreetMap le "tourism=chalet" n'est pas un chalet en bois de montagne, c'est une location de meublé
Voir :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:tourism%3Dchalet

En bref, il caudrait mieux ne plus rentrer de chalet tant que maps.me n'est pas clair avec ça (si ça vient bien de ça) sinon on pourrait croire qu'il y a des gîtes de partout dans la montagne !
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:49:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Gazer75 (2016-11-11 12:27:10+00:00): Did they actually close this before completing the new temporary ramp?
There is no mention of this on the projects Facebook page.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:48:58+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
ff5722 (2017-01-02 07:59:36+00:00): Hi, you added 'name=assam' to a way, but this way is only part of an object, so it won't be visible on the map.
What does it refer to?
If it refers to the large forest area, you should put the name on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6089918/
Oh, and use Capital Letters :)
Владимир К (2017-05-17 11:33:07+00:00): Ваш дом? Живёте тут?
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:48:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
martiensch (2016-10-09 09:43:33+00:00): Hallo Freedumb,

Du hattest die Spree bei der Museumsinsel in Berlin angepasst, leider ist es schiefgegangen. Die Wasserfläche war komplett verschwunden.
Hattest du dir diese Seite schon angeschaut? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank

Gruß,

Martien
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:48:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:48:16+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:48:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 09:18:28+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
SK53 (2016-10-06 19:03:25+00:00): I'd put Premier as brand=Premier. It's a trading fascia owned by Booker Group (formerly a buying group IIRC). The shop is likely operated entirely by the folk behind the counter.
Jez Nicholson (2016-10-07 07:33:21+00:00): Thanks Jerry. Agreed. I've updated it.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-06 12:25:59+00:00): Oops - as well as a couple of new buildings you managed to upload the "learnosm" test data - "Cat Forest" etc.
I've reverted it; would you like to try again?
SomeoneElse (2016-10-06 12:33:07+00:00): Also, the new things that you added, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446086268 , didn't have any tags on them (that just connected a road to a power line).  If you're local to the area, maybe try moving the guest house http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4305891604#map=19/31.84423/54.32542 to the correct location?  Currently it's in the middle of the street.
Best Regards,
Andy
Allroads (2016-11-10 11:23:29+00:00): Which aerial photo is this, how is it licensed?