piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kieraaaa (2022-06-01 16:06:17+00:00): Booking cannot change anything about the distance I was on a call with them for 4 hours. and its false also these 2 building are on the same parking lot and the real distance is 50m but in the statement of openstreetmap is 500m. it also appeared on booking after someone added these building to openstreetmap.
Filip009 (2022-06-01 16:19:28+00:00): But that is error on their side not on side of OpenStreetMap. The second building was changed to guest_house 5 years ago.
Kieraaaa (2022-06-01 16:32:03+00:00): There was a change to property 5 months ago. And from that moment it showing false distance
Filip009 (2022-06-01 16:44:20+00:00): Yes, hotel geometry was changed 5 months ago. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115103304 But hotel has not been moved for 500 meters. So I still think there is some error on booking's side.
Filip009 (2022-06-01 16:45:21+00:00): And I do not think, that when you delete the hotel it will solve your problem, do you think so?
Kieraaaa (2022-06-01 17:01:50+00:00): But it causing troubles for the guest and hotel when it is calculating from openstreetmap. It’s false still. The owner didn’t change it and from that moment booking is showing something what he cannot change it can be change only by deleting the hotel from openstreetmap.
Filip009 (2022-06-01 17:05:02+00:00): But how will now tourist find this hotel on OpenStreetMap based maps, when you have deleted it?
Filip009 (2022-06-01 17:05:37+00:00): It is win for description on booking (maybe), but loose for everybody else.
Kieraaaa (2022-06-01 17:27:17+00:00): They are not using openstreetmap they use googlemaps.
Filip009 (2022-06-01 17:33:56+00:00): But other tourist which are using OpenStreetMap based maps. Now you have deleted these hotels from maybe thousands of maps, which are taking these data from OpenStreetMap. Just because on booking is bad distance.
Kieraaaa (2022-06-01 17:52:23+00:00): So openstreet map can destroy businesses? because someone make false update?
Filip009 (2022-06-01 17:58:31+00:00): No, but they can help people, which are trying to get there by their navigation. And now, if you have deleted these hotels, they will just disappear from their map. But when somebody else, who map, will see that there is hotel missing he will draw him back. So I do not think that you have had make a good job deleting it.
Filip009 (2022-06-01 18:46:46+00:00): So, I'm reverting your changeset, because he has contained good informations. Mistake, which you are looking for is somewhere else.
kayle (2022-06-02 04:57:13+00:00): Eell, this text in english "Apartments Kvasničník features mountain views, free WiFi and free private parking, located in Demanovska Dolina, 2.3 km from Jasna." is different in slovak version "Ubytovacie zariadenie Apartments Kvasničník sa nachádza v obci Demänovská Dolina 2,3 km od turisticko-športového centra Jasná a 8 km od Demänovskej ľadovej jaskyne".
Rough translation "Apartments Kvasničník is in village Jasná 2,3 km from tourist-sport centre and 8 km from Demänová ice cave."
Which is +- near to distance from OSM map.
German and hungarian text is same as english. 
My guess. Incorrectly translated text into other languages.
kayle (2022-06-02 05:07:59+00:00): Sorry, error in my translation from SK, not "Apartments Kvasničník is in village Jasná" but "Apartments Kvasničník is in village Demänovská Dolina". Sport centre is named Jasná and is 2,3km from apartments.
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 12:54:17+00:00): Great work, thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping and  please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121732612
do not bring quebec into this (2022-06-28 14:10:43+00:00): what do you use to measure width?
Kevo (2022-06-28 17:36:26+00:00): In that case I tried the new measure tool in StreetComplete (uses the camera).  If it's a road width (like Main/King) that I added, then it's usually by making a measurement in JOSM.
olo81 (2022-12-01 13:47:52+00:00): nazwa opisowa
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
mavl (2022-06-09 13:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mike140 (2022-06-03 19:22:00+00:00): дворовые проезды обозначаются highway=service, highway=residential - это жилые именованые улицы
mike140 (2022-06-03 19:31:07+00:00): и не стоит на дороги и тропы добавлять столько промежуточных точек
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 14:37:35+00:00): Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121733554
VictorIE (2022-06-01 06:44:40+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065293201

Should this be an ordinary sidewalk?
eireidium (2022-06-01 09:14:04+00:00): I don't think so but surely open to discussion. It is wider and paved and seems to be intended as an off street cycling way. I would normally have marked as sidewalk but it seems intended to be multipurpose?
mavl (2022-06-10 15:51:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122217199 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6055].
gzin (2022-06-05 15:32:16+00:00): Spitze! La Sonett schnell eingetragen ;-)
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 14:00:55+00:00): Great work, thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping and  please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121734134
bxl-forever (2022-05-31 08:18:25+00:00): Hello,

This is a tram-only stop here, the infrastructure makes it physically impossible for buses to run along the infrastructure.

Looks like one more mistake in the GTFS feed.  You’re not blindly applying the GTFS onto OpenStreetMap, are you?

What bus line did you spot here, please?
Tchet (2022-05-31 23:49:31+00:00): I've been there many times as my colleague lives there and we did some "homeworking/coworking". The tram line 19 is split in two and a very short replacement bus runs on a part of the same route, also numbered 19. The stops that ends with an F (xxxxF) are mostly the one for tramways while the same number without F is for bus. In this precise case the bus stop is not permenantly marked, more likely a stop mast on a concrete block, which would be temporary anyway. The reference without F can be used anytime the tramway is out of service. For me it's okay if they map to the same platform; it's the next best thing than having some loose reference.
I actually get to go around outside a lot in my work (*) and don't trust random data. I have even found some mistakes like a bus stop inside the water at "Etangs d'Ixelles" I will ask about.

(*): this is what we do at the moment: https://www.lalibre.be/regions/bruxelles/2022/05/04/des-annonces-sonores-aux-arrets-de-bus-et-de-tram-a-bruxelles-le-nouveau-dispositif-de-la-stib-pour-les-malvoyants-2BAAC44HE5DFVOMUHZNGZM3V2Y/
Tchet (2022-05-31 23:52:30+00:00): We can agree we don't agree but I've seen exactly the same things at other places with "wxyz;wxyzF" as reference, even with only the tram passing through center lane. So it's hard by looking at patterns to see what is wrong or right.
Creating non-existing objects from GTFS would be the worst. I will do some survey soon :-)
Tchet (2022-06-01 00:09:49+00:00): I think I will review my 100 items lists, moslty to see if they already exist as De_lijn stops then it's mostly done.


stop like this don't need to be added:
7520,,"DEFACQZ",,  50.828554,   4.362114,,,0,

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.8284903,4.3622959,3a,75y,191.07h,88.53t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s8oslnzRCAw6WVgyvSHvE0g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
StefanHRT (2022-05-30 18:41:32+00:00): Kleine Info. Bilder welche mittels StreetComplete gemacht wurden, sinbd nicht dauerhaft verfügbar-->URL kann alsoi nicht verwendet werden ;)
user_14771166 (2022-05-30 19:01:35+00:00): Danke für den Tipp.
Becky Candy (2022-06-07 07:29:32+00:00): Thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to hit each corner of the buildings and please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121734525
Becky Candy (2022-06-07 07:36:43+00:00): Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121734525
mavl (2022-06-10 15:51:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122217199 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6055].
Frans S (2022-06-22 10:52:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121734814
eggie (2022-09-06 10:57:37+00:00): Dag Seat Ibiza,

Weet jij toevallig  hoe het zit op de Wilhelminabrug... en dan vooral aan de westzijde...  allemaal destination en oneway=yes tegen de richting in... maar het zit ook vol met busrouterelaties. Dus ook nog voorzichtiheid geboden. Het kan niet met editor iD.
Maar mag je nu inmiddels dus van oost naar west over de brug? 


Zie deze actie van een startende mapper. Dat gaat allemaal niet routeren.

Kun jij eens advies geven 'in this matter' ?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-06 11:01:15+00:00): Ik neig naar een revert.. Pas maar even niets aan als je het niet zeker weet.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-09-06 11:33:20+00:00): Hoi.. Ik heb beide changesets al teruggedraaid van startende mapper.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125847363#map=19/50.85186/5.69593

en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125847450

MVG
eggie
Becky Candy (2022-06-06 14:15:19+00:00): Thank you for your mapping! To improve for next time, please zoom in close enough when tracing to hit each corner of the buildings and please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121734991
chris66 (2023-04-14 11:44:11+00:00): Siehe OSM-Note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3446729

Sicher, dass das ein öffentlicher Parkplatz ist (access=yes) ?
Mond00 (2023-04-14 18:39:04+00:00): Zum damaligen Zeitpunkt sollte der Eintrag passend gewesen sein. Vielleicht hat sich der Zugang im letzen Jahr auch geändert. Bitte an die aktuelle Situation anpassen. Danke
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-30 13:31:34+00:00): Hi Hiausirg,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
zluuzki (2022-08-02 08:19:38+00:00): The source is the Texas RRC Website - public domain data (https://mft.rrc.texas.gov/link/d4eda8c4-9ff0-43b7-8f19-da0a57f10fd2). Everything manually reviewed - and I will also add further detail by adding substations/wellsites/valves/etc later (and did that already on large parts of southern tx).
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-02 08:23:50+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
Is your import documented here?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
zluuzki (2022-08-02 08:49:23+00:00): Added.
b-jazz (2022-06-02 16:48:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065311883 makes some crazy turns and then crosses itself. Unless there is some magic four way intersection pipe fitting there, the way should be fixed in whatever way is appropriate.
Dodko (2022-12-27 15:14:16+00:00): Ak pridávate adresu vyplňte všetky 3 položky
addr:conscriptionnumber
addr:housenumber
addr:streetnumber

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71543876/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71543947/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71543964/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71544014/history

niektoré adresy nemajú ulicu a orientačné číslo, vtedy sa addr:street nevyplní, ale použije sa addr:place
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71543962/history
berndw (2022-05-31 09:26:31+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Warum löscht Du Gebäude die auf Luftbildern zu erkennen sind, mit dem Kommentar "DSGVO"?
Was hat das Vorhandensein eines mehr oder weniger öffentlichen Gebäudes mit Datenschutz zu tun?
Wäre schön, wenn Du diese Frage beantworten würdest.
wkdgs (2023-02-09 09:15:33+00:00): Da hier wohl keine Antwort mehr kommt, hab ich es rückgängig gemacht.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121735626
WM252TH (2023-02-09 10:05:26+00:00): Es wurde lediglich die Bezeichnung von dem Gebäude gelöscht. Und vielleicht haben sich die Personen auch dabei was gedacht, dass nicht direkt für jeden ersichtlich ist was es ist. per PN gerne mehr.
berndw (2023-02-09 10:38:03+00:00): Dann schreib das bitte in den Kommentar.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Colin Smale (2022-05-31 06:35:41+00:00): English regions have been abolished and never were administrative anyway. Admin level 6 is not appropriate here anyway. Please take care to check with local mappers first before making this kind of important change!
Badojo (2022-05-31 16:14:11+00:00): I see that regions are not administrative but on osm they are tagged as level 5. Now the Greater Manchester and North West England relations both have level 5 and are overlapping
Badojo (2022-05-31 16:27:14+00:00): Then level 5 should be removed from regions but it's still weird that Manchester and West Midlands should  have level 5 while London has level 6 although all of them cover multiple government districts in the same way
Colin Smale (2022-05-31 16:44:47+00:00): Yes, the regions are losing their boundary=administrative and admin_level=5 tagging.
Badojo (2022-05-31 16:48:33+00:00): Ok, thank you for clarifying. Also, will other combined authorities be added? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_authority)
Colin Smale (2022-05-31 17:03:09+00:00): Yes, I am working on it. I checked with the community first, by the way.
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-29 16:52:38+00:00): Hi ff5722,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
ff5722 (2022-07-29 16:55:16+00:00): Hi, I'm simply tracing the roads and forests by hand. Using the FastDraw plugin it is relatively fast to do so.
ff5722 (2022-07-29 16:56:15+00:00): btw, changesets with more than 10,000 changes are split in separate changesets automatically, hence why it looks like I uploaded 10,000 bare nodes first
DressyPear4 (2022-05-31 22:16:31+00:00): Olá, 'ford' indica que a água passa por cima da via, verifique melhor se o correto seria substituir por galeria
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121736296
foersterp (2023-02-03 20:36:16+00:00): Hallo, ein kleiner Hinweis zu deinen Änderungen der Kleingärten im Bereich Beelitz: Wie in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name beschrieben, soll der name-Tag nicht eine Beschreibung des Objekts sein. Gucke dir das bitte mal an. Dass dies Kleingärten bzw. Gartensparten sind, beschreibt ja bereits der Tag landuse=allotments. Gleiches gilt übrigens auch für die Rasenflächen. Ich habe die Namen nun wieder entfernt. Danke!
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-30 21:08:34+00:00): Will you be able to come back on to re-add it when it has reopened?

Generally, temporary road closures are not mapped if it is expected to reopen since people tend to forget to revisit it.
Jacob Joel (2022-05-31 00:24:43+00:00): Yes, I live on this block and watch the construction every day. At least a half dozen times I marked this street as 'road closed' in Waze and selected 'long term'. But it never sticks. I wasn't sure how else to mark it closed. 
I will make the edit to open the street as soon as it reopens - which likely won't happen until at least Fall 2022.
noonfyi (2022-07-15 16:09:24+00:00): I've changed the road from a residential road to a "Road Under Construction" and added a construction zone around it for the construction on W Cary. Changeset 123660300: 12https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123660300

I also moved your original FixMe comment to a Note, so it has been preserved. Hope that helps!
Jacob Joel (2022-07-15 17:33:11+00:00): Thank you cittura. This makes the sidewalk on the east side of S. Shields appear inaccessible (even though it is accessible). But that's probably a reasonable compromise for showing a more accurate representation of what is happening on the street.
user_5359 (2022-06-01 09:43:05+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir mal http://www.osm.org/way/52297923 nochmal an. Was ist die Bedeutung der Tags
AFB_ID = 597
ERZEUGT_AM = 2021-08-27
GMDE_BZ = Glauburg
GMDE_NR = 440010
GMK_BZ = Glauberg
GMK_NR = 346
ID1 = 77.0
KREIS_BZ = Wetterau
KREIS_NR = 440
REGBEZ_BZ = Darmstadt
REGBEZ_NR = 4
?
surveyor54 (2022-06-01 21:13:16+00:00): Oh, ist mir durchgerutscht, das sind die Tags im Shapefile, sollte natürlich gelöscht werden.
Danke für die Info.
eggie (2022-05-30 20:27:43+00:00): Dag Michel..  Dit is zeker nuttig. Nu zit je niet meer gevangen op het fietspad.
Je zou de hoofdrijbaan naast het fietspad  heeft nog kunnen taggen met bicycle=use_sidepath
Dan staat de hoofdrijbaan op slot.. mits het een G11 en/of G12a fietspad betreft.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-30 20:30:03+00:00): Deze tagging hoort trouwens op de verschillende fietspaden
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
------
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, 
traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
----
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
eggie (2022-05-31 07:37:15+00:00): Zeilbergesestraat en Molenstraat aangepast volgens bovenstaande.
Nog genoeg te doen hier zie ik. 
Groet
eggie
archpdx (2022-06-03 01:20:39+00:00): Hi,
Please note that 'Primary Road' should only be used for major highways like Highway 26 (see https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:highway=primary)
dcapillae (2022-05-30 20:38:39+00:00): Buenas tardes, Kenke. Gracias por los cambios.

Esto no parece un parque («leisure=park»). Quizás se asemeje más a un jardín («leisure=garden») o a una zona cubierta de césped («landuse=grass»), aunque me parece que no es ninguna de las tres cosas.

En el wiki encontrará más información sobre estos etiquetados:

Jardín o parterre ajardinado: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

Parque: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Zona de césped: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

Si no es un parque ni un jardín ni una zona de césped, quizás se trate simplemente de una parcela cubierta de vegetación que crece allí de forma natural. En ese caso, puede etiquetarla con «natural=heath» (zona predominantemente cubierta de hierba) o con «natural=scrub» (zona predominantemente cubierta de arbustos). Si la vegetación es predominantemente arbórea, puede etiquetar el área como «natural=wood». 

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel
dcapillae (2022-05-30 20:43:17+00:00): Un último apunte: Si lo desea, puede ampliar el contorno del parque (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065333183) para que incluya dentro todas las instalaciones y zonas ajardinadas. Parece que todo forma parte del mismo parque.
Colin Smale (2022-05-31 06:49:45+00:00): You can change them all back again now, as the original edit was erroneous.
user_177389 (2022-05-31 08:12:19+00:00): Ok, thank you!
eggie (2022-05-30 20:39:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Oke, maar access=no is bijna altijd fout.
Je kunt wel aangeven 
smoothness=very_bad
Nu kan er helemaal niemand meer door met access=no
Ook loopt hier de Rondelenroute overheen.  Die is dan nu ook geblokkeerd.
De wegklasse lijkt me ook eerder highway=track tracktype=grade5


Welk bord staat hier vooraan.



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-30 21:03:42+00:00): De wegklasse heb ik aangepast naar track en access=no verwijderd.
Nu nog de wandelroute herstellen. Die was ook door de war.
eggie (2022-05-30 21:17:51+00:00): Aan beide kanten ligt nog een barrier=log
Je kunt hier niet door met een breed voertuig.
wkdgs (2022-06-01 05:58:44+00:00): Was haben die Änderungen mit der DSGVO zu tun?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121737742
ZeLonewolf (2022-06-22 02:20:02+00:00): Looks like the Mumbai boundary is broken, not sure if this change caused the issue or an earlier change...
user_8101879 (2022-06-26 16:59:23+00:00): I fixed it
user_2066394 (2022-05-31 18:07:50+00:00): Und die Statuen stehen mitten im Weg drin?
EUradfahrer (2022-05-31 18:51:24+00:00): Ich verstehe deine Bemerkung, wollte sie aber nicht ins Wasser platzieren :) Habe nochmals im Wiki nachgeschaut, und eine Fläche mit man_made=bridge erstellt. Siehe Anderungssatz 121780546.
Passt es so?
user_2066394 (2022-05-31 19:58:48+00:00): Einwandfrei :-)

Exkurs noch zu Flächen bei Treppen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aarea%3Ahighway%3Dsteps
Rogoyski (2023-04-22 18:42:58+00:00): Zakładasz, że chodzi o szlaki PTTK? Ja to rozumiem tak, że nie należy schodzić z istniejących już ścieżek.
Glassman (2022-06-02 23:45:43+00:00): The adjacent street is Golden Falls Loop but the address you added shows the street as Golden Hills Drive. Can you review this edit and correct either the address or the street?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121738992
ottwiz (2022-05-30 21:13:02+00:00): Note that one of the forest multipolygons, namely 14205318 doesn't have all of its clearings mapped. Will do tomorrow but right now I have to go to sleep (and this is a note for me to continue it)
Lejun (2022-05-31 08:05:50+00:00): Salut et merci de la contribution. Attention, tu as semble-t’il tracé un nœud[1] et un polygone[2] sans attributs. Je te laisse apporter les modifications nécessaires.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9784031950
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065348673
Lejun (2022-05-31 08:07:06+00:00): Essaie de mettre des commentaires à tes groupes de modification histoire qu’on comprenne ce que tu as fait. Le Carrefour City a changé de local ?
user_5359 (2022-06-01 07:02:15+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/627684994/history. What is the meaning of the tag ++= ?
ExpresswayDave (2022-06-01 11:44:39+00:00): It was a typo. I've removed that tag.