piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 20:23:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Myazyk (2017-04-29 20:12:08+00:00): Ви дуже звинувачуєте мене у вандалізмі і погрожуєте забаненням.
А самі, навіть будучи у сільраді, не змогли правильно зазначити локалізацію Кривого Хутора.
А ще ви такі обізнані, а не знаєте, що слово "Хутір" пишеться з великої літери. І не знаєте, що слово "Хутір" на англійську потрібно транслітерувати, а не перекладати.
Вочевидь, скаржитимусь і я на Ваші некоректні правки
mavl (2018-12-25 21:19:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Commodoortje (2017-04-21 10:08:41+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleren middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-04-21 10:09:00+00:00): weet je toevallig of van biede poi's een website beschikbaar is?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:26:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Marián Kyral (2017-04-21 11:37:49+00:00): Zdar, víš o tom, že jsi všechny budovy posunul na přesně opačnou stranu než by měly dle KM být?
Petr1868 (2017-04-21 13:19:05+00:00): no to tedy nevím jak se to mohlo stát - použil jsem tracer RUIAN
Marián Kyral (2017-04-21 13:27:27+00:00): On je tam totiž rozdíl mezi KM a RUIAN, která vzniká při přepočtu souřadnic z jednoho systému do druhého. A problém je, že na severu je ta odchylka největší.

Zkus zkontrolovat nastavení Traceru, jestli tam nemáš nastavenou nějakou korekci. A je dobré, kontrolovat RUIAN vs KM. V Paskově je problém, že tam ta digitalizace ještě není dokončená a KM je ještě postaru.
Petr1868 (2017-04-21 13:33:16+00:00): v předvolbách traceru žádnou korekci nastavenu nemám - co s tím mám tedy udělat - revertovat uvedenou sadu změn.
Marián Kyral (2017-04-21 13:57:12+00:00): Nech to tak Je to sice posunuto na druhou stranu, ale není to nijak velký rozdíl. Doporučuji kontrolovat RUIAN vs. KM.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:16:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:23:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Tomas Straupis (2017-04-21 10:10:32+00:00): restored incorrectly deleted place=village on node 3093855128

http://osmhistory.appspot.com/changeset/47996337
Jay May (2017-04-21 10:39:29+00:00): Thanks. My computer crashed when I was modifying that one ...
mavl (2018-12-25 21:05:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:25:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:49:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:04:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:50:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:33:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:34:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:37:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:30:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Allroads (2017-04-21 12:07:56+00:00): Hallo, op basis van welke data gebruik maak je de aanpassingen, BING is oud, we hebben nu Luchtfoto actueel van de overheid en ook is RWS Rijkswaterstaat, DTB (digitaal topografisch bestand), te gebruiken, als wms laag eronder te liggen, deze twee lagen dan zie je op de luchtfoto de afdak RWS kloppend nu.
De editor voor zulke klussen is JOSM, straks moet iemand anders het weer veranderen, beter in een keer goed dan half.
Allroads (2017-04-21 12:10:52+00:00): Daarbij moet de weg eroverheen ook nog goed gelegd worden, de RWS DTB wms vlakken layer is hier bijzonder geschikt voor.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
elgolfo (2017-05-07 07:53:36+00:00): die gelöschten infos in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48467843 repariert
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 16:53:39+00:00): Addresses not updated with this road name changed.  Done.
Commodoortje (2017-04-21 10:12:01+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-04-21 10:14:36+00:00): Je bedoeling is goed, je ziet op de kaart niet alle nummers. Maar ze zijn er wel zoek maar eens op een huisnummer in het zoekvenster.
Daarom heb ik je changeset(s) teruggedraaid.
Lucdegroot (2017-04-26 13:55:18+00:00): De nummers zijn echt verkeerd ... Ik (Luc de Groot, vader van Pim) woon hier op nummer 60 in het meest rechtse appartement. De huisnummers in dit gebouw lopen van 60 t/m 68. Nummer 36 hoort daar dus zeker niet te staan. Van de zes appartementsgebouwen kloppen veel nummers niet; die wilde mijn zoon verbeteren.
Commodoortje (2017-04-26 14:24:39+00:00): Ik geloof je, de info die in OSM stond is vanuit de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) geïmporteerd. Dit betekend dat de gemeente foute informatie in haar database heeft staan.
Zou u of uw zoon een terugmelding willen maken? Dan wordt dit door de gemeente medewerker opgepakt en ( ook) gecorrigeerd in het bronbestand.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=3261CG&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=0584010001296763&geometry.x=88838.753&geometry.y=426406.6&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0584200001307832
In onderstaand plaatje zie je waar je de terugmelding kunt maken (het potloodje)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/p3noxrvsfwhd6jt/2017-04-26_16-09-10.jpg?raw=1

Wel wil ik nog zeggen dat in elk van deze gebouwen 6 verschillende adressen vermeld staan. In het rechtse gebouw zie je 36 staan, maar in OSM staat 6 nummers te weten: 32; 34; 36; 38; 40 en 42
In al die andere complexen is dat ook zo maar dan met andere nummers natuurlijk. Ik heb de adresnodes inmiddels iets verder uit elkaar gezet 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48164843
Commodoortje (2017-04-21 10:19:52+00:00): Revert due to ignorance
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 13:41:31+00:00): Also adjusted addresses for this change.
AlaskaDave (2018-11-22 03:01:48+00:00): Hi,
I noticed this changeset comment on this way id:260723849, and another that connects to it. But the surface is still tagged as unpaved.
I'm convinced these are not tracks but either unclassified or residential ways but knowing what the surface is would be helpful.
Can you check on that?
AlaskaDave (2018-11-22 03:04:06+00:00): The other way is id:260723853. Your comment on this changeset is "just drove this road and can confirmed it is concreate paved"
poornibadrinath (2017-04-24 11:03:29+00:00): Hi meijerry,
  I came across your edits and noticed while you added the town name, you have deleted the place=town tag itself. Please be careful when you are editing and ensure you are not deleting any valuable data while editing a feature. Thanks!
Best,
Poornima
Jay May (2017-04-24 18:33:40+00:00): Hi Poornima!
Thanks for your note.
How can I see where is the mistake I made? I see only a zone, but not the place itself. 
Kind regards
Jerry
poornibadrinath (2017-04-26 06:30:03+00:00): Hi Jerry, This is the node for which you deleted the town tag. You can open the node in JOSM and check. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/317360830
Poornima
Jay May (2017-04-26 08:37:03+00:00): Wow, I hadn't even seen I deleted it! Thanks!
mcld (2021-01-03 22:03:25+00:00): Hi peregrination - we surveyed this area recently and I can't find much evidence for this "Armada Green Park". Is it locally known? The concreted area is there, and open, but the previously "scrub" part seems to be under construction (as car park?). It doesn't seem to justify a designation of leisure=park to me. Do you have further info? If not, I'll de-park it.
peregrination (2021-01-04 10:08:53+00:00): I've not been back in 3-4 years, but I believe that it's a public space made of 75% concrete, 25% grass,
and indeed called Armada Green Park, but it's not trying to compete with Thames Barrier Park, it's quite rough.
There's a footpath there going along the Thames, part of the Capital Ring.

you can see the name being used here for example : https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6405346

The name "Armada Green Park" may have been deprecated since, I'm not sure.
peregrination (2021-01-04 10:11:02+00:00): also I've changed the shape of the park just now as it was mapped across a part which is private land.

I'm not sure what's the best leisure/landuse tag to use for this "Park", you probably got a better suggestion than leisure=park ?
mcld (2021-01-04 10:35:56+00:00): Thanks. I agree with your edit. I don't know of a better "landuse", though perhaps it's appropriate to remove landuse, and replace it with surface=concrete access=public, while keeping the name?
peregrination (2021-01-04 15:01:19+00:00): yes that's a good idea, go for it :)
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
Josef73 (2019-03-25 19:12:10+00:00):  Hello, there are two tags for opening hours for the node 3792423729. For which days stand the openinghours and for which openinghours_1 ?
Commodoortje (2017-04-21 11:10:53+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
maraf24 (2017-04-23 15:58:46+00:00): Gajowa to raczej nie jest droga ekspresowa? Trochę za kręta;)
eggie (2017-04-21 11:41:41+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
richlv (2020-04-10 20:37:10+00:00): Now that addr:flats is rendered, it can be seen that all entrances for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110797504 have it tagged as 1-15.
Could this be accidental?
chillly (2017-04-21 11:21:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail
You have used the name tag to mark the species or genus of the tree.  We only use the name tag to refer to a name given to that object, on trees a name would be very, very rare. Misunderstanding the use of name tags is a common beginner's mistake.There are tags for species, genus and taxon depending on what you can add for each tree.

HTH
chillly (2017-04-21 11:28:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail
I think the name tag may be more of a description than a name. It is a common beginner's mistake to put too much into the name tag. We add the name that the place has on a name board or sign. If there's no such name we leave the name tag blank.

HTH
Mike Baggaley (2017-04-30 11:37:20+00:00): Hi Henry, welcome to OpenStreetMap. I hope you are enjoying mapping. If I could make a small point, please don't make up descriptive names such as Park Path or Park entrance path - if a highway or point of interest doesn't have a proper name, the name field should be left empty.

Best wishes,
Mike
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
Graf Westerholt (2017-10-31 07:54:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1596426250

Hast du hier bei opening_hours das PH vergessen?

Su off ist übrigens überflüssig, wenn ansonsten für den Tag keine Öffnungzeiten angegeben sind.
Euskirchener (2017-10-31 10:10:56+00:00): Hallo Graf Westerholt,
soweit ich mich erinnern kann habe ich es glaube ich nicht vergessen sondern einfach nicht gesetzt, weil ich dazu keine Angabe gefunden habe. Danke für den Tipp mit dem Sonntag.
Grüße, CorrectMapper
eggie (2017-04-21 11:45:20+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-21 11:56:38+00:00): PB gestuurd
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
MJ Ray (2017-05-18 12:18:30+00:00): This change fractured the cycle routing, which I have now corrected.
Pink Duck (2017-05-18 13:32:48+00:00): I didn't realise, my apologies about that. Thanks for fixing it early. Overall the change to valid speed limits was worth it for the interim period. I normally try to ensure relations remain unaffected.
Pink Duck (2017-05-18 15:01:11+00:00): I've reviewed your changes and enhanced the route relation further given the crossings of Hardwick Road and Scania Way.
MJ Ray (2017-05-19 12:30:57+00:00): No worries and thanks. Should https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494448271 be oneway:bicycle=no or will share_sidewalk (which I can't find documented) enable that anyway? I suspect that in time, I will have to add the tracks in that area as distinct ways anyway.
Pink Duck (2017-05-19 19:21:44+00:00): I don't think there was anything explicitly saying the cycle access was one-directional. It just happens to be along the southern end of Hardwick Road where the best facilities are. I tend to tag with cycleway:left=share_sidewalk when there's no physical separation aside from kerb between the road and shared pavement where it runs for a long distance. If you wish to tag these as explicit separate ways then I'm fine with that, I normally just do it if there is sufficient distance apart. Most cycle routers will see cycleway:left as a hint that facilities exist, even if they don't understand the value. The share_sidewalk tag value should probably be documented, but I think it quite logical.
freeExec (2017-04-24 06:29:49+00:00): Получилась фигня, что хотел-то?
eggie (2017-04-21 12:01:27+00:00): Wat bedoel je met "Betreft Aletta Jacobsweg."?
eggie (2017-04-21 12:02:36+00:00): Ahh... ik zie het al.. Sorry.. de rendering loopt nog achter.
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
eggie (2017-04-21 11:49:03+00:00): Lars ,.. wanneer dit een fietspad is hoeft foot=yes niet aangegeven te worden.
Voetgangers mogen op het fietspad. .. en soms moeten bij gebrek aan voetpad.
eggie (2017-04-21 11:51:36+00:00): Nou meen ik eigenlijk wel zeker te weten dat dit gewoon een wandelpad is. Dus gewoon highway=footway
Of zijn er andere borden geplaatst.
eggie (2017-04-21 11:52:55+00:00): Graag reactie.
geow (2017-04-26 18:32:22+00:00): Hi milet, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Kurze Frage: Ist dieser Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485849197

wirklich ein beschilderter Fußweg (Verkehrszeichen 239) oder dürfen da evtl. auch Radfahrer fahren. In diesem Fall bitte besser path statt footway nutzen. Mehr dazu hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

Danke, dass du OSM besser machts!
milet (2017-04-26 19:10:40+00:00): Hallo, danke!
Ja, dieser Weg ist tatsächlich mit Zeichen 239 beschildert. Zusätzlich wurde auch noch eine Fahrrad-Sperre aufgestellt. Ist für mich auch nicht nachvollziehbar, warum das keine gemeinsamer Rad-/Fußweg sein kann. Bisher ist allerdings auch nur am westlichen Ende ein Schild angebracht...
Nachdem ich den Weg ursprüglich als path angelegt hatte, habe ich vorort nochmal kontrolliert und dabei dann das Schild gesehen (und fotografiert).
geow (2017-04-26 19:31:17+00:00): Super - danke! Dafür, dass du erst 3 Wochen dabei bist, sieht das nach einem sehr guten Start aus. :-)

Noch ein Tipp, da du iD als Editor nutzt: Du kannst unter Ebenen (rechts in der Werkzeugleiste) auch "Bavaria 80 cm" als Luftbild auswählen, die sind im Gegensatz zu Bingbildern aktueller und korrekt entzerrt.

Viel Spaß weiterhin bei OSM!
eggie (2017-04-21 12:16:45+00:00): 'k heb even die pitches in een multipolygo gezet anders renderen ze niet als veld op de afgeleide kaarten.
Met iD is dat niet te doen, met editor JOSM een peulenschil.
eggie (2017-04-21 12:21:02+00:00): Nu staat vv Albatross nog wel steeds 3x op de kaart. Je kunt de naam ook op de adresnode zetten met verdere info. website, sport, aard van de node.
OSMAPD (2017-04-21 16:59:03+00:00): Doe ik dat
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-05-03 16:11:42+00:00): Royal cyphers and post box references are commonly written with capital letters