piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2021-10-29 16:07:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет здание с названием "котельная". Котельная обозначается специальным тегом.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113066541
Pitoresker Pi (2021-10-29 16:50:29+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier einen nicht mehr vorhandenen Weg geändert zu "key:highway=yes". Den Präfix "key" kenne ich so nicht und denke, es sollte besser ein anderer (Lebenszyklus-)Präfix sein?! Also vielleicht "razed" oder "removed"? Dann ist auch das access=no obsolet.

Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
mueschel (2021-10-31 10:19:19+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "motor_vechile" in many places. Could you fix the spelling mistake, it should be "motor_vehicle"?
NieWnen (2021-10-28 13:19:32+00:00): Dzięki!
osmviborg (2021-10-28 08:06:09+00:00): Lad være med at hæfte græs- arealer fast på landeveje. Rettet.
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:05:05+00:00): Added buildings
Jakka (2021-10-29 19:53:13+00:00): Vous mettez sur les terrains de foot "acces=yes" ? Toutes le monde peut jouer dessus ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113069527
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:06:40+00:00): Added buildings
txemt (2022-07-03 15:13:11+00:00): Why was this separated out without adding the turn lanes into the system?
ashybko_lyft (2022-07-05 08:45:29+00:00): Hi, txemt
My name is Anna and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for asking! Lanes tag was added to each road segment along the West Camp Wisdom Road from South State Highway 360 to the service road near Lake Ridge Parkway https://osmcha.org/changesets/113069734/. We usually add turn:lanes tags based on signs, road markings and traffic lights.  In this changeset I have added turn:lanes tag on some segments using the newest street-view imageries: see segments near Magna Carta Boulevard https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997100477, Lynn Road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997100484 and etc. Other road segments don’t have specific signs, so they were left without a turn:lanes tag. Please, contact us, if you have any additional questions. Thank you for your contribution!

Regards,
Anna
marczoutendijk (2021-11-02 20:48:14+00:00): Of course it is an upload! But what did you upload?
literan (2021-10-28 17:32:09+00:00): извините,  но правки кривые, бездумное изменение тегов. Откатываю.
ovruni (2021-10-28 20:52:04+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios indicas " different street name" sin embargo ninguna de estas vías contienen un nombre. ¿De donde se sabe que tienen nombres diferentes?
Saludos
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:07:01+00:00): Added buildings
ovruni (2021-10-28 20:57:26+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado una vía que al parecer ya no conecta con la vía inferior, esto puede observarse desde la imagen de Maxar Premium.
aixbrick (2021-10-28 11:24:13+00:00): Hallo,
im Bereich Bocksmühle hast du Hausumrisse geändert. Bitte binde dir dazu auch den ALKIS-Layer ein, da dieser die genauen Umrisse enthält. Dazu passt dann auch das lagegenaue NRW Orthophoto. Wenn es Unstimmigkeiten zwischen ALKIS und Luftbild gibt, ist wahrscheinlich das Luftbild aktueller, ansonsten sollten die Umrisse aus ALKIS passen und in OSM übernommen werden.
Weitere Anmerkungen:
- Rechtwinklige Gebäude können mit "Q" rechtwinklig gemacht werden (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997105167).
- Die Hausnummer 3 ist doppelt.
- Hausnummern bitte einheitlich schreiben <Zahl><Kleinbuchstabe>: also 3b, nicht 3 B.
- Gibt es dort tatsächlich die Nr. 3b? ALKIS kennt diese nicht (kann aber auch ein Fehler in ALKIS sein).
Bitte schaue dir das nochmal an.
Gruß
STEIN_aus_KELMIS (2021-10-28 11:54:44+00:00): hallo Aixbrick,
danke für deinen Hinweis.
Rechtwinklig habe ich das gemacht.
ALKIS Layer sagt mir nichts, - wie binde ich das ein? - Oder meinst du www.geoportal.nrw ?
Ich arbeite in Deutschland mit NRW orthophoto,
sonst meist in Belgien mit ESRI Weltbilder (Klarheit Beta)
oder dem Katasterplan 
finanzen.belgium.be/de/privatpersonen/wohnung/kataster/katasterplan/herunterladen/lambert-2008/2019 
über CADGIS
Ja, die 3 ist (noch) doppelt, der nördlichere Teil müsste tatsächlich mal kontrolliert werden. Ist aber in jedem Fall ein eigener Eingang von der Nordseite her. Der südliche Teil der 3 ist aber OK.
Und in Belgien machen ich immer A B etc in GROSS BUCHSTABEN ist dort einheitlich.
Ist das in DE nicht so???

in www.geoportal.nrw
ist 3 B auch drin. . . 

Liebe Grüße Michael
aixbrick (2021-10-28 12:33:58+00:00): Das verlinkte Gebäude sieht etwas krumm aus, daher der Hinweis auf "Q".
ALKIS kannst du über den Button Bildmaterial > Benutzerdefiniert einbinden. Als URL https://www.wms.nrw.de/geobasis/wms_nw_alkis?FORMAT=image/png&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=adv_alkis_gesetzl_festlegungen,adv_alkis_tatsaechliche_nutzung,adv_alkis_weiteres,adv_alkis_gebaeude,adv_alkis_flurstuecke&STYLES=&SRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox} angeben.
Du hast zumindest hier mit ESRI Clarity gearbeitet ("imagery_used").
Normalerweise sind das Kleinbuchstaben, siehe auch ALKIS. Im Zweifel sollte es aus Einheitlichkeitsgründen so erfasst werden, wie bei den anderen Adressen.
Im Geoportal (Geoviewer) finde ich 3b nicht oder ich suche an der falschen Stelle.
ovruni (2021-10-28 21:03:20+00:00): Esta vía actualmente cruza una vivienda, esto puede verse de las imágenes de Maxar Premium.
ToniE (2021-10-28 09:04:14+00:00): Hi raubART,

ich habe das Gebäude wieder gelöscht, da dort schon Gebäude gemapped sind und Gebäude in Gebäude nicht geht.

Wenn es um einen Teil eines Gebäudes geht: building:part=yes wäre das dann.
Das wird aber meist "nur" verwendet um 3D-Modellierung mit unterschiedlichen Geschosszahlen, Dachformen, ... zu modellieren.

VG
Toni
ToniE (2021-10-28 09:09:38+00:00): BTW: Vorsicht mit BING-Hintergrund, der ist nicht Lagegenau. Aber Du hast ja "Bayern (80 cm)" genommen, das ist OK.

Habe "Eingang Nord-Ost" gerade auf einen Gebäude gelegt, den Gebäudeteil abgetrennt ...
highflyer74 (2021-10-30 12:16:04+00:00): Hello!

In this edit and a couple of other edits you use motor_vechile=* to tag ways. Please note that it needs to be motor_vehicle=* in order to work.

Also I noticed there are lots of redundant tags on highways in general (e.g. oneway=no or layer=*. Maybe you could keep an eye on those as well when editing in order to keep data quality high.

All the best to you!
francians (2021-10-28 11:55:59+00:00): Ciao,

Grazie per il contributo. Suggerirei per il futuro di non indicare access=yes sulle fontanelle. È il default e non è necessario. Ho qualche dubbio anche sull'uso in sedia a rotelle, di solito è un tag che si mette su altri tipi di amenity es. Cinema, ristoranti, fermate del bus.

Francesco
b-jazz (2022-04-26 09:09:55+00:00): Why is the sawmill (997112059) listed as a building? I don't see a building in any of the latest satellite imagery.
mavl (2021-10-29 16:05:33+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет новую дорогу прямо поверх существующей дороги. В результате на карте одна реальная дорога обозначена двумя линиями. Это ошибка. Одной дороги вполне достаточно.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C  
  
Лишняя дорога удалена.
aceman444 (2022-04-01 06:09:46+00:00): Zdravim, zmena crossing=uncontrolled na crossing=uncontrolled;marked je uplne zbytocna. Su to vzajomne duplicitne hodnoty, takze davat ich obe je nezmysel a staci ponechat uncontrolled. Dakujem.
pippoSVK (2022-04-01 06:11:51+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za info. Do buducna budem vediet
aceman444 (2021-11-27 23:44:45+00:00): Zdravim, ked robite autobusove zastavky, nepridavajte nove public_transport=platform a bus=yes (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997116535), ked uz prislusny objekt reprezentujuci zastavku existuje (tu napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2012486907). Ked chcete vyjadrit plochu nastupista (chodik ci dlazdenie), treba dat nejaku fyzicku znacku: highway=platform ak je plocha nastupista evidentne odlisena od zvysku chodnika (napr. dlazdenim, stopou pre nevidiacich), alebo highway=footway. Ak je to obycajny chodnik. Len public_transport=platform je nedostatocne a nereprezentuje fyzicky objekt nastupista. Ako mozete vidiet, na mape sa Vam vykreslili diery v chodnikoch, kde ste dali len public_transport=platform. Opravil som.
Lee Carré (2021-10-28 22:42:32+00:00): The waterfall spans the Atlantic? Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Since you also changed more than a waterfall, your changeset comment is misleading: what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

“National Agriculture Imagery Program”

Should be specified in imagery_used.
Ltrlg (2021-10-29 09:12:11+00:00): `source` is more precise than `imagery_used` (per wiki, `imagery_used` “doesn't necessarily mean the imagery was actually used as a source”) and `imagery_used` is neither automatically set nor easy to fill in JOSM. I see no point in duplicating in `imagery_used` what is already in `source`.
joost schouppe (2021-10-29 12:45:57+00:00): @Lee: I don't know of any waterfall spanning the Atlantic, no. I thought I saved after each waterfal I touched, my bad. Hence why the changeset comment is also wrong.  
@ Ltrlg: I have no idea what you're trying to say about the imagery_used tag, I don't see that on my changeset.
For the record, the changes in Belgium are based on local knowledge & probably some SPW imagery.
Ltrlg (2021-10-29 16:31:47+00:00): @joost It was in response to the last part of Lee’s message. I though it was obvious from the context, but maybe I should have added a “@Lee”.
Lee Carré (2021-11-01 15:04:11+00:00): @Ltrlg

“‘imagery_used’ is neither automatically set nor easy to fill in JOSM”

That's a problem with JOSM's implementation, then; file a bug report. Other editors populate the field automatically.


“I see no point in duplicating in ‘imagery_used’ what is already in ‘source’.”

Doesn't mean that there isn't one.

Each tag serves a different purpose.

Off the top of my head, one would be analytics (‘find all changesets which match …’).

You seem to have assumed a human-readable context, and ignored the machine-readable one (semantic data).
Ltrlg (2021-11-02 10:29:09+00:00): @Lee

“a problem with JOSM's implementation”: You are the one asking, I find the current behavior enough. I see no point in filing a bug report myself. But don’t ask _users_ to manually fill that field unless it is reasonably easy.

“machine-readable context”: no tag is perfect. `imagery_used` can both include imagery that was not actually used and miss other sources (imagery or not) while `source` being mostly free-form in editors is hard to split/match automatically. That is far from ideal for automated use, but it’s probably (close to) the best that can be done. Anyway the consequence is that to do anything sensible now and in the foreseeable future with changesets' sources, you need both.
Adrion (2021-10-30 02:38:52+00:00): Hi! Can I suggest that you reconsider "smoothing"? Looking at just a small part of this changset that I know very well, it alters the boundary of the Paddock recreation ground to run through a house (Way: 446007915), and duplicates a gate (your Node: 9207230377, previously at the boundary of the footway and the landuse perimeter, now left meaningless Node: 4868153837). I appreciate that simplification can be useful, but in this locality the changeset is un-doing careful mapping based on personal survey. Thanks!
Adrion (2021-11-01 02:28:20+00:00): Hello again... I've now taken a closer look at the changeset and I see that the errors I noticed are the exceptions to sensible rationalisations you made. As a local I will fix the things I complained about. Best wishes!
Adrion (2021-11-03 01:15:40+00:00): I think I've fixed it (changeset 113307438) but it was more complicated than I expected! When I had previously tried to improve this location from survey, I hadn't realised what a mess of landuse boundaries was there - you were doing good work to help sort it out.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-17 13:10:31+00:00): Hello,
According to http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=164352225 , in here you changed the address on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164352225/history from "40-70" to "41-70".
It has been suggested that this matches sources that are not compatible with OpenStreetMap, and does not match what is observable on the ground.
What source did you use for that address?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-17 13:11:02+00:00): Привет,
Согласно http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=164352225, здесь вы изменили адрес на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164352225/history с "40-70". к «41-70».
Было высказано предположение, что это соответствует источникам, которые несовместимы с OpenStreetMap, и не соответствует тому, что наблюдается на земле.
Какой источник вы использовали для этого адреса?
С уважением,
Энди Таунсенд, от имени рабочей группы OSM по данным.
eggie (2021-10-31 17:28:54+00:00): Dag mapper.. Je vraagt feedback..
Lijkt mij oke zo.
MVG
eggie
kartonage (2021-10-28 12:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in cs 113080605 due to it being vandalism.
Martin Borsje (2021-10-28 19:13:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
maraf24 (2021-10-29 08:25:14+00:00): A jakieś źródło?
voltairovicz (2021-10-29 10:33:04+00:00): Podział działek
maraf24 (2021-10-29 18:02:22+00:00): Chodziło mi o samą budowę. 
Aktualne zdjęcia pokazują rozpoczęcie prac na jednym odcinku.
maraf24 (2021-10-29 18:09:59+00:00): Znalazłem tylko: https://www.rynekinfrastruktury.pl/wiadomosci/drogi/wschodnia-obwodnica-wroclawia-ruszyla-budowa-poludniowego-odcinka--78603.html
Zastanawia mnie "Zaprojektuj i wybuduj" i 14 miesięcy realizacji. Coś tu nie gra.
Jakka (2021-10-29 19:49:33+00:00): La barrière à été supprimée, OK vous n'enlèvez pas tag "barrier=*" ?
aTarom (2022-02-09 15:58:30+00:00): Hi, why do you put many member ways in the relations as role = route ?
I don't find that role value as valid in the wiki.
Best regards.
Lostmonkey (2025-03-25 07:36:11+00:00): Ang. punktet 'Anders Peter Laursen (9207395181), v1' Er det meningen, at tagget fvst:navnelbnr bare kan bruges på en gård (place=farm) uden at der tagges med andet? Bruges fvst:navnelbnr ikke normalt til at identificere butikker, slagtere osv.? Kan se en snes tilfælde, hvor det blot er knyttet til en gård uden yderligere tags.
b-holdet (2025-03-26 05:31:38+00:00): Det ser ud til at han er slagter
https://www.findsmiley.dk/70724
Lostmonkey (2025-03-26 06:53:02+00:00): Men skal fvst:navnelbnr så ikke være knyttet til en shop=butcher eller shop=farm? Troede meningen med bruge Fødevarestyrelsens data var at finde og kortlægge spisesteder, butikker og andre lignende tilbud målrettet kunder/kortbrugere?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2025-04-16 22:10:28+00:00): Fødevarestyrelsen laver også rapporter på landbrug, der producerer fødevarer.

Jeg prøver at filtrere den slags fra, fordi jeg mener at det er mindre relevant for de fleste OSM brugere og for at mindske min egen arbejdsbyrde. Jeg er allerede en del bagud med restauranter, barer, butikker mm.
ovruni (2021-10-28 21:08:00+00:00): Hola Elsy Rivadeneyra, he notado que tanto en este como en el conjunto de cambios anterior se han agregado edificios en áreas que son de los lotes, en las cuales algunas contiene un edificio dentro, mas no el área completa, por lo que los he modificado.
Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
canfe (2021-10-28 13:11:15+00:00): Il valore grass è per piccole aree come da wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass
forse pascoli? o farmland?
canfe (2021-11-04 17:18:01+00:00): Le file di piante vicino al cimitero vanno mappate come filare tree_row
highflyer74 (2021-12-16 16:26:36+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Vielleicht kannst Du die Bremer Community erhellen, bei was es sich hier handeln soll und warum es auf einer Straßenkreuzung "herumliegt".

Viele Grüße!
lakedistrict (2022-04-19 21:57:47+00:00): Would this info be better on the relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5982501), as it applies to the school as a whole (both the senior and prep school campuses) rather than just the senior school site?
confusedbuffalo (2022-04-20 08:54:36+00:00): Yes, good point. I've put appropriate information on all three objects now
francians (2021-10-28 11:52:03+00:00): Ciao,

Grazie per il contributo, si tratta di una fontana (come taggato) o una fontanella (drinking_water)?

Grazie
Francesco
Ecomuseo Terra del Castelmagno (2021-10-29 16:04:25+00:00): Ciao Francesco, 
si tratta di una fontana ma come vedo dalla wiki (amenity=drinking_water Luogo dove trovare "acqua potabile" in piccole quantità per uso personale (escursionismo, ...);) direi che il tag giusto è drinking_water. Correggo e segnalo ai ragazzi che mi stanno aiutando
Grazie a te, 
Noemi
BCNorwich (2021-11-10 14:16:01+00:00): Hi, I  just wanted to point out that you've somehow tagged lots of nodes as amenity=parking_space
capacity=4
parking_space=permit

Rather confusing as you've also mapped the parking areas and individual parking spaces tagged as fee=no.

Seems like a lot of duplication with the areas and the individual spaces mapped.

Regards Bernard.
naturallytony (2021-11-11 13:07:03+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. I have now corrected a lot of it and will double-check tags later.
Kind Regards, Tony
archie (2021-10-28 11:18:10+00:00): Var vänlig fäst inte landuse till highway. grassland används inte på gräsområden i bebyggt område. 
Var vänlig och förstör inte multipolygoner.
osmviborg (2021-10-28 12:00:15+00:00): Hej. Københavns Kommune mener noget andet, det er dem der placerer adresserne. Du kan kontakte kommunen hvis du mener adressepunktet er placeret forkert. Punktet bliver automatisk flyttet tilbage.
algot (2021-10-29 12:41:30+00:00): Я уже писал, что на местности там нет знака "Одностороннее движение"
И едущие с Глинки и Циолковского спокойно могут поворачивать налево.
Я поставил запрет поворотов с З. Белой и Гетьманской, как на знаках
Но эти улицы не односторонние, встречное движение без нарушений ПДД возможно тоже
os-emmer (2025-04-18 15:28:13+00:00): Hello CroKimba,
you added some waterway=baywatch here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6257738725
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6257738726
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7518271292
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9207490444
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9207490445
What are these places? Are they emergency=lifeguard?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=lifeguard
CroKimba (2025-04-19 06:48:46+00:00): Well, they are metal lifeguard towers, and it appears that the waterway=baywatch tag has been removed from the tags after I tagged these towers. I'll tag them as emergency=lifeguard / lifeguard=tower instead.
os-emmer (2025-04-19 10:23:20+00:00): Thanks for the reply. You used the deprecated emergency=lifeguard_tower instead of the now accepted emergency=lifeguard. I fixed that. Now it should be correct.

Thank you for your support.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165146828
SHARCRASH (2021-10-28 11:26:31+00:00): more to be corrected after discussion in larger community
SHARCRASH (2021-10-28 11:32:15+00:00): See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cu5
LiFo (2021-10-28 23:47:01+00:00): Why have you added this tag to  a house ?
mueschel (2021-10-29 07:30:24+00:00): The tag was added in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113012499
DoKimbDeSun (2021-10-29 23:28:32+00:00): I have updated it. The houses are tagged as building=yes now and the guesthouse/cafe is one node now.
the tag fo:veganr wasn't intended to be made by me but it seems some tags were cut off in my changeset. It has been saved only partially and I uploaded what I had.
LiFo (2021-10-29 23:34:42+00:00): ok. so an error i think (about the us.fo tag).
the tag is an identifier i use for updating and importing address nodes, and should not be used for anything else than address nodes in the Faroe Islands
DoKimbDeSun (2021-10-29 23:41:50+00:00): is removed from the building now :)
mueschel (2021-10-29 17:25:30+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please check the tags you added here for spelling mistakes - even the slightest mistake (e.g. bulding instead of building) makes the data not usable for any map.
seichter (2021-10-28 17:00:28+00:00): There is a more serious problem in the Trans Bhutan Trail imports by user Sonam Yangdon than just the truncation of description. 
The ways are unprocessed imports of GPS-Tracks, up to three on top of each other. The imported tags make no sense in OSM.
I am trying to convert things to route relations in OSM scheme, but that's tedious and often several thousand points are affected.
So if you intend to work on that TBT problem, too, please contact me to avoid mass upload collisions.
highflyer74 (2021-10-30 12:06:40+00:00): Moin! Die von Dir hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298390017 hinzugefügten Tags sind nicht wirklich passend für OSM. Könntest Du da nochmal drüberschauen? Danke!
swiki (2021-10-30 15:56:06+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis; Fix ist eingespielt.
redd (2021-10-29 07:17:35+00:00): * Add shop
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 12:37:11+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-24 00:10:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120107886 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some personal markers in Ukraine
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 12:37:19+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
Linda Palmén (2021-10-30 06:44:56+00:00): Gösta Berlivgsväg 35
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-09-05 22:09:26+00:00): amenity=school isn't the correct tag for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997161344
DUGA (2024-07-27 23:31:17+00:00): What crossing is this? Do you have any idea what is going on around this gate?
jmilot (2024-07-29 13:04:44+00:00): What kind of comment is this? This is a 3 years old edit, if it doesn't reflect reality or OSM best pratices, feel free to edit as your liking while respecting guidelines.
DUGA (2024-07-29 20:20:01+00:00): Asking you a very simple question of why marking this as a crossing, now you tell me the edit was done by a 3 year old?

What kind of reply is that?
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:09:53+00:00): 
Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SekeRob (2021-10-28 13:01:35+00:00): outer scrub that is :O)))