user_2398645 (2022-08-20 10:29:27+00:00): Openstreetmap.org edit log
====
Alexandra Tudora (CERN); John Osborne (CERN); Volker Mertens (CERN)
"Future Circular Collider Technical Note: Feasibility study of a trans-Jura FCC scenario with one transfer line from the LHC"
2020-12-01
FCC-2012011930-ATU

Borehole B07 for FCC.transJura geosurvey

Inaccuracy radius < 50m


46.4306470, 4.9383724
46.3484989, 5.2022547
46.3783872, 5.3741421
46.3621565, 4.9061014
46.4335173, 5.1947557
46.2696005, 4.9952497
46.4306470, 4.9383724
46.3484989, 5.2022547
46.3469731, 5.2036756


description=Inaccuracy radius < 50m
inaccuracyRadius=50m
name=Borehole B06 for FCC.transJura geosurvey
natural=borehole
note=Alexandra Tudora (CERN); John Osborne (CERN); Volker Mertens (CERN)\n\"Future Circular Collider Technical Note: Feasibility study of a trans-Jura FCC scenario with one transfer line from the LHC\"\n2020-12-01 \nFCC-2012011930-ATU
source=survey

inaccuracyRadius=100m
name=Borehole B04 for FCC.transJura geosurvey
natural=borehole
source=survey
reference=Alexandra Tudora (CERN);John Osborne (CERN);Volker Mertens (CERN)\n\"Future Circular Collider Technical Note: Feasibility study of a trans-Jura FCC scenario with one transfer line from the LHC\"\n2020-12-01 \nFCC-2012011930-ATU

inaccuracyRadius=50m
name=Borehole B03 for FCC.transJura geosurvey
natural=borehole
source=survey
reference=Alexandra Tudora (CERN);John Osborne (CERN);Volker Mertens (CERN)\n\"Future Circular Collider Technical Note: Feasibility study of a trans-Jura FCC scenario with one transfer line from the LHC\"\n2020-12-01 \nFCC-2012011930-ATU

inaccuracyRadius=150m
name=Borehole B02 for FCC.transJura geosurvey
natural=borehole
source=survey
reference=Alexandra Tudora (CERN);John Osborne (CERN);Volker Mertens (CERN)\n\"Future Circular Collider Technical Note: Feasibility study of a trans-Jura FCC scenario with one transfer line from the LHC\"\n2020-12-01 \nFCC-2012011930-ATU

inaccuracyRadius=50m
name=Borehole B01 for FCC.transJura geosurvey
natural=borehole
source=survey
reference=Alexandra Tudora (CERN);John Osborne (CERN);Volker Mertens (CERN)\n\"Future Circular Collider Technical Note: Feasibility study of a trans-Jura FCC scenario with one transfer line from the LHC\"\n2020-12-01 \nFCC-2012011930-ATU

highway=cycleway
layer=-1
tunnel=yes
access=permit
bicycle=permit
horse=no
width=20
smoothness=excellent
surface=concrete
name=Future Circular Collider Tunnel (in feasibility study)
dog=no
covered=yes
maxspeed=299792458
note=The speed limit is for particles, not for humans and their macroscopic vehicles.
description=This planned 100-km circumference tunnel will be part of the Future Circular Collider. \\n\\nPlease support its construction to let it bring new physics which will definitely boost our science and technology, and finally make our lives better. \\n\\nThe physi
website=https://fcc.web.cern.ch/
wheelchair=limited

Created this draft about CERN tunnels and particle paths.

Marked some electromagnetic wave transmitters recognized from satellite images, with information from the public internet.

====

acubens71 comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125059117
[[[
Hi,

I don't think it is a good idea to map a project that hasnt been ever approved yet (especially with a wrong tag like highway=cycleway).

Also on the map on fcc.web.cern.ch, there is only a ring around Geneva, not anywhere near here. Whats your reference for this one ?
]]]

EMWavenet reply:
Hi acubens71,

The four temporary nodes and the way were deleted, then I noticed your comment. Thank you for it.

The Future Circular Collider has at least three candidate tunnel routes, among which the "trans-Jura" one has its advantage. This report explains more:

Alexandra Tudora (CERN); John Osborne (CERN); Volker Mertens (CERN)
"Future Circular Collider Technical Note: Feasibility study of a trans-Jura FCC scenario with one transfer line from the LHC"
2020-12-01
FCC-2012011930-ATU .

The "way" feature set of
(
	highway=cycleway
	layer=-1
	tunnel=yes
	access=permit
	bicycle=permit
)
is proper for all the CERN human-accessible tunnels. These tunnels are designed for light-duty vehicles, such as electric carts, scooter, and bicycles. These tunnels are wide enough to settle the experimental apparatuses, and to let the constructors, maintainers, physicists, and permitted people run around. These tunnels are not for everyday use of trucks, so highway=motorway is not proper. Cycle way is the best until OpenStreetMap draws special lines for CERN tunnels. :)

We need to show maps of important scientific projects to the public. Because:
1. The local people need to know of the projects, and join the process for or against these projects.
2. OpenStreetMap is a good portal to introduce its users to the projects and their science.
3. OpenStreetMap can be more interesting and useful by helping its users learn about the coming future on the map.
4. Students can see the large structures and detailed "work flows" of the experiments on the map. OpenStreetMap is better in many aspects than static pictures, videos, 3D models not embedded in maps, or even the official CERN GIS-based maps. OpenStreetMap needs a powerful 3D mode, though.

Thank you again for making great maps.

(end of this reply)