piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GUFSZ (2023-04-14 05:39:17+00:00): Gab es eine Reaktion auf diesen CS Kommentar auf anderem Wege. Auch in Form einer Korrektur?
ironspock (2023-04-14 15:38:29+00:00): siehe meinen Kommentar zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129013697
Marek-M (2022-12-14 20:37:14+00:00): Cześć, dodanie tagów bicycle+foot do highway=track nic nie zmieni w routingu rowerowym. Track ma je domyślnie przypisane są one nadmiarowe. Jeżeli uważasz, że te drogi powinny być częściej wykorzystywane w nawigacji rowerowej, to lepiej jest podnieść tracktype z grade5 do np. grade3 lub grade2 (zgodnie ze stanem rzeczywistym) - szczegóły tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:tracktype , dodatkowo można dodać tagowanie smoothness https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:smoothness i ewentualnie surface określić bardziej precyzyjnie. Te 3 tagi biorą główny udział w ustalaniu rooutingu w nawigacjach.

Pozdrawiam :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130050548
michud71 (2022-12-14 22:39:41+00:00): Dzieki, ze zrobiłeś taki opis, że ci sie chciało. super !!!  Tam jest droga leśna, ale przy okazji wiedzie tam szlak rowerowy : Wolność jest w Naturze (szlak rowerowy czerwony). Jest to taka ścieżka ktora nie jest urwardzana niczym poza korzeniami i butami pieszych. Zmieniłem surface na bad, ale nadal nie wybiera tej drogi.
Marek-M (2022-12-15 06:41:02+00:00): Jeżeli nie jest to piaszczysta lub błotnista trasa, to lepiej jest zmienić tracktype niż smoothness. Jest to tag, który wskazuje jak zwięzła jest nawierzchnia i czy np. po deszczach albo podczas suszy jest po niej trudno przejechać.

A teraz zapytam jeszcze o nawigację :) Nie wiem czy zdajesz sobie sprawę, że istnieje przynajmniej kilkanaście aplikacji do nawigacji wykorzystujących dane OSM. Każda z nich w inny sposób te dane interpretuje. Na dodatek dane z OSM do nawigacji są pobierane z różną częstotliwością (niektóre robią to co 1 godzinę ale są też takie, które aktualizują dane np. raz w roku - większość aplikacji  pobiera te dane co 1-3 miesiące ).

Zatem ustalmy najpierw jaką nawigacją weryfikujesz dane w OSM :)
michud71 (2022-12-15 10:44:08+00:00): W okolicach Trójmiasta używam od ** lat roweru jako głównego środka lokomocji. Czasem wyznaczam trasę po prostu na stronie OSM. Staram sie podać 2 plunkty i niestety trasa jaka powstaje jest bez sensu bo nie obejmuje rzeczywistych tras jakie są. Chciałem ten mały kawałek poprawić aby także ta mapa była zgodna z rzeczywistością bo tam jest szlak rowerowy. Na co dzień w tasie używam Komoot i OsmAnd. Obie dobrze wyznaczają, ale jak sie poprzeciąga punkty pośrednie bo tez miewają kłopoty. Tylko ja te trsy znam, a co ma powiedzieć osoba co nie zna? Tu, jak pisałem, chciałem tylko poprawić źródło. W okolicach Trójmiasta spędzam wiele godzin dziennie na rowerze i chciałem oddać rzeczywistość także tu.  Czy odpuscić  i zostawić to tym zewnętrznym aplikacjom ?
Marek-M (2022-12-15 11:31:18+00:00): Fajnie, bardzo dobrze, że chcesz poprawiać mapy. Każda nawigacja zasadniczo opiera się na punktach dla wybranej trasy i dla różnych typów pojazdów te punkty są liczone z inną wartością. Np. na stronie https://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=9/54.3381/19.2535/standard całkiem fajnie pokazywane są tzw. koszty przejazdu https://imgur.com/BMCyDMM (oczywiście inne aplikacje mają własny algorytm jego wyliczania, ten w brouter można konfigurować samemu).

Jeżeli coś zmienisz na mapach OSM, to rezultat zmiany w routingu zobaczysz dopiero po ok. 1 tygodniu, bo tak często ten domyślny routing na https://osm.org jest aktualizowany. Komoot i OsmAnd w domyślnej konfiguracji chyba aktualizują dane raz w miesiącu (OsmAnd Live ma możliwość aktualizacji nawet co godzinę ale nie jest to standardowa konfiguracja). Dlatego też pomiędzy kolejnymi zmianami warto trochę poczekać.

W przypadku tych dróg moim zdaniem można ustawić tracktype=grade3 (grade5 dotyczy dróg bardzo bardzo złej jakości) i wtedy większość nawigacji powinna puścić tą trasą z wyższym priorytetem. W tym roku na pewno tą trasą jechałem i na pewno grade3 do niej pasuje.

Całkiem niezłe przykłady tracktype są na zdjęciach na wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:tracktype
aTarom (2023-03-15 18:25:59+00:00): Hola aBirba,
pots revisar aquesta edició, si us plau?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1868771269/history
al comentari del changeset diu
 Nom popular: Costa Pubilla
llavors seria
loc_name
el nom esborrat
"Cim de Pla de Pujalts"
no es correcte?
Si tens cap dubte, pots posar-te amb contacte amb el canals de la comunitat
a
https://t.me/osmcat
ó
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/lang-ca/69

em dius quelcom, salutacions cordials
habi (2025-04-10 14:06:16+00:00): Ciao Pan
Here you've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1117729356 with `roof:shape=1`.
It's not entirely clear from the aerial imagery what the correct roof shape should be, so I simply removed it.
If you care, you can put the correct value back.
Happy mapping,
habi
suchAnight (2022-12-15 17:47:12+00:00): Source: Maxar Secure Watch
user_3022894 (2023-04-04 19:25:38+00:00): Hallo dswup,

das Tag "private=yes" (betrifft den Hydranten, den du hier bearbeitet hast), ist einer Unter-Tag von access=private. Es wird nur dazu genutzt, access=private genauer zu beschreiben, wobei access=private als Haupt-Tag aber stets vorhanden sein muss.

Daher kannst du, wenn du ein Objekt als für die Öffentlichkeit nicht zugänglich kennzeichnen möchtest, gerne access=private (anstelle von private=yes) verwenden.

Viele Grüße
Lukas aka Elefant
EliotB (2022-12-29 10:00:37+00:00): Something wierd has happened to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5643612197 in this changeset.  ? 2 nodes merged that should not have been?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-12-14 19:11:01+00:00): Maybe footways should have been changed to paths instead of bicycle=yes? I think it would be enough for mtb routers and renderers like cyclosm.
dgmapping (2022-12-16 11:45:12+00:00): Path vs footway - in this case it doesn't really matter. This trail is clearly build for hiking but I would say that over 90% is easily ridable with MTB. There are some tight and difficult sections as well so this might not suitable for all skill levels.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-01 02:02:05+00:00): Hello arctic-rocinante. Just clearing a Note that you left here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3481663, & noticed that you have mapped all the picnic tables & so on, but from imagery, it appears that you've mapped some of them as actually being on the playing surface of the Oval, rather than over their visible locations? Are you certain of these locations? Thanks.
arctic-rocinante (2023-01-01 03:39:35+00:00): Hi Fizzie41, thanks for having a look. Those locations may indeed be a bit off. I didn't have satellite imagery to cross-check with at the time (was using OrganicMaps), and my GPS was probably less accurate than I realised.

I've since switched to a better editor (GoMap), so it hopefully won't happen again. I'll fix up these locations 👍
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-01 03:58:10+00:00): Thanks!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-12-14 19:08:14+00:00): Just noticed that id editor actually saves your Strava key under imagery_used. Not sure if it can be used somehow, but just so you know. You can remove it under "Tags" section when uploading.
dgmapping (2022-12-16 11:49:41+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. Just checked that there are total of 3 required URL parameters for showing detailed Strava heatmap. Currently it looks like "Signature" parameter is left out so these Key-Pair-Id/Policy values should be harmless.
surveyor54 (2022-12-28 08:36:46+00:00): Hi,
wir dürfen seit Februar 2022 die Geodaten von der  Hessischen Verwaltung für Bodenmanagement und Geoinformation benutzen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hessen/Geodaten_online

 Einige Gebäudepunkte wurden hiernach schon korrigiert. Warum wurden sie von die wieder verschoben?

Fragende Grüße
surveyor54
marczoutendijk (2023-01-26 09:46:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10261384122
¿Por qué ha utilizado aquí la etiqueta sym=Car y time?
Y sólo name=Cafe no se renderiza. ¿No debería figurar amenity=cafe?
nevw (2022-12-14 05:50:25+00:00): This JESUS LIVES nonsense is just vandalism. Just map the actual individual trees if you must subject the OSM to this.
NigelTD (2022-12-14 06:03:47+00:00): FYI I only changed 2 of the letters from "hedges" to "trees" on my property. And BTW, it wasn't me who added the stupid things in the first place! I'm busy NOT replanting them and the remaining ones will be dead soon courtesy of the last bushfire. Feel free to remove all the letters if you like, I'm an Atheist anyway. Maybe lookup who added the letters to OSM in the first place and have a go at them instead?
nevw (2022-12-14 06:43:39+00:00): Thanks for clearing that up Nigel. Since sending my comment I have been more diligent and and looked at it in more detail. I am pleased to see it is reverting to a more natural state with time gradually healing the scar. As a result of the bushfire I suppose there is not much point in mapping the area as natural=wood until the area recovers.
Zandu (2023-11-20 15:30:43+00:00): Not an import. Drawing from recent Bing imagery and local survey.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130054704
Frans S (2022-12-14 13:58:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
a few issues:
you mapped a few traces (4 nodes) as Place=isolated dwelling.
This is not the correct way to tag a place.
See the instructions.
Just add a single node and tag it.
The whole direct area, the settlement can be mapped and tagged as landuse=residential.
Best regards and keep mapping
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-14 05:57:22+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
flohoff (2022-12-14 15:30:49+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier exzessiv neue highway=traffic_lights eingetraen an den Fußgängerampeln. Die entfene ich wieder.

Das problem hier ist das ein highway=traffic_ligh ein penalty im routing bringt. Das ist für eine Fußgängerampel natürlich quatsch. Das ist ja eine reine Anforderungsampel - Da reicht ein highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_lights und nicht noch zusätzlich 2 highway=traffic_lights.

Routingänderung war u.a. das hier weil die die Andreasstraße mit einem mal SEHR viel schlechter war:

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=388858,454765#51.95598,7.99092,15z

Flo
mariotomo (2023-01-10 14:42:32+00:00): hola. si quieres completar/mejorar esta contribución, debería ser "boundary=administrative".
de todas maneras muy seas bienvenido a OSM y si tienes información local es lo que más hace falta en Panamá.
https://community.osm.org/
Koreller (2023-05-25 10:09:12+00:00): What are your sources for the location of all these changes and POI in Kanggye and Samjiyon?
aaei924 (2023-05-25 12:45:58+00:00): Maybe from 38north
MxxCon (2022-12-14 04:07:19+00:00): Hello.
Are opening hours and phone number remain the same as the previous business?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130055482
aapeliv (2022-12-14 04:09:21+00:00): phone number yes, i forgot to check opening hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130055482
user_17724595 (2023-01-11 20:15:09+00:00): The "memorial" tag requires "historic=memorial" to be set, otherwise it should be deleted. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10261465030/history
user_5359 (2022-12-18 07:08:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
latania_a (2022-12-16 09:53:00+00:00): Hi, Why you not give the car access to through pass on it? Because I thought this only forbidden for cars from reverse of one way
amtplskaart (2023-04-26 13:02:22+00:00): HI, I guess you are right, thanks for editing that. I must have been refer to a wrong street level image.
user_5359 (2022-12-18 07:08:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2022-12-18 07:09:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Koreller (2023-05-25 10:01:30+00:00): What are your sources for the location of all these changes and POI in Kanggye ?
Zandu (2023-11-16 18:17:03+00:00): Not an import. Drawing from current Bing imagery and confirmed by survey.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130056193
user_11609320 (2022-12-14 03:12:19+00:00): STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE - SHC
DIVISION 1. STATE HIGHWAYS [50 - 897] ( Division 1 enacted by Stats. 1935, Ch. 29. )
CHAPTER 2. The State Highway System [230 - 635] ( Chapter 2 enacted by Stats. 1935, Ch. 29. )

ARTICLE 3. The State Highway Routes [300 - 635] ( Article 3 repealed and added by Stats. 1963, Ch. 385. )

366.
(a) Route 66 is from:

(1) Route 210 near San Dimas to the eastern city limit of the City of Pomona.

(2) The eastern city limit of the City of Rialto to Route 215 in San Bernardino.

(b) The relinquished former portions of Route 66 within the city limits of the Cities of Claremont, Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, and Upland are not state highways and are not eligible for adoption under Section 81
emersonveenstra (2022-12-14 13:40:51+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution! A couple of notes on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095036118
1. Phone numbers have a very specific format requirement, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage for details
2. websites need to have http:// or https:// in front of the url
3. while it's not explicitly forbidden, you are the only one in the world to use government=psap, so I'm wondering what that tag means, in case there's a better way to tag it

Thanks!
AgamemnonTWC (2022-12-15 10:11:08+00:00): Howdy! Thank you for your correction here, my apologies, I am entirely new to this and didn't realize there was specific formatting for more than just the hours of operation. I'm not sure if you already fixed my formatting, but I'll be sure to read up on the correct formatting for all the fields, correct my mistakes if you didn't already, and do it right going forward. As to the use of the term PSAP, the term stands for Public Safety Answering Point. It's the official US term for an emergency communications (or 911) center. I simply didn't see a tag that seemed applicable, and so created one without thinking to look at similar locations. In retrospect, most people aren't regularly navigating to 911 centers, and most of those who do already know where they're going, so such a tag probably isn't warranted, and I'll attempt to find an existing tag that's more appropriate.

Thank you for your patience as I learn here!
AgamemnonTWC (2022-12-15 16:00:56+00:00): On phone number formatting - if I understand correctly, the required formatting for a typical US phone number would be to require dashes at all number breaks (or none of them), as well as the country code. So a number typically written (999)999-9999 becomes +1-999-999-9999 or +1 999 999 9999. Am I understanding correctly?
emersonveenstra (2022-12-16 14:16:25+00:00): Awesome, thanks so much! I haven't fixed any of your errors, so feel free to go back through and fix them

Yes, you're understanding the phone numbers correctly.
Zandu (2023-11-16 18:31:44+00:00): Not an import. Drawing from Bing imagery and local knowledge.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130056759
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-14 03:40:43+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=42.046267%2C-70.688100%2C17.24
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-14 03:44:07+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=33.841775%2C-84.479720%2C17.77
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-14 03:51:19+00:00): Source for name: https://www.radiostadmontfoort.nl/cms/00012975.html
marczoutendijk (2022-12-15 09:44:21+00:00): When do we see more descriptive Changeset Comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Dimacn (2022-12-14 06:09:20+00:00): Почему вы переименовали улицу добавив ей номер? Что значит 136 в названии улицы?
Эрдынеева Ольга (2022-12-14 06:13:53+00:00): Название улицы верное, добовлен номер дома 136
Dimacn (2022-12-14 17:37:54+00:00): Зачем номер дома в названии улицы!?
Kovoschiz (2022-12-14 05:44:32+00:00): For the n-th time, please fix your application. Not fiddle with data used by everyone else.
Dimacn (2022-12-14 06:07:10+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста не надо спортивным площадкам присваивать названия "Спортивная площадка".  В тег name пишем только названия, а не описание объекта. Пожалуйста поправьте.
Эрдынеева Ольга (2022-12-14 06:15:12+00:00): Здравствуйте! Поправим
Diacritic (2022-12-14 09:43:37+00:00): Hi Luc,

As discussed previously, I have removed the names that contradict official sources.

In this change in particular, you also changed the names of some of the tracks from their gazetted, official name to an alternate name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130059057
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-12-18 06:21:04+00:00): 您这对着的是什么底图啊，怎么把直的往歪改啊
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130059208
LucasYang (2022-12-27 03:25:09+00:00): 现场测绘的底图
plennert (2022-12-18 11:03:38+00:00): was bitte ist das dein für ein Änderungsnachweis "nur für plennert". Bitte unterlasse das zukünftig!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130060419
chnuessli (2022-12-18 12:12:15+00:00): Beweist nur dass du hier Stalking betreibst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Streit
Gazer75 (2023-01-15 15:34:49+00:00): This is actually wrong. A substation is an area and anything inside it is part of this station.
Gazer75 (2023-01-15 15:38:29+00:00): To explain a bit more. The south building contains an indoor compact gas insulated switchgear for both the 66kV and 132kV grid. The north building had the old 66kV and probably some 22kV switchgear inside.
The old one is afaik going to be removed along with the old outdoor 132kV to make room for a new 420kV outdoor switchgear.
DeltA_Shok (2023-01-16 14:47:52+00:00): Thanks, Gazer75 for reaching out. It makes sense that you have rolled the data back, but I have a follow-up question about adding a multipolygon relation to a substation. As the relation only has a single member (outer), can we transfer all the tags in it to a simple area and remove the multipolygon? Any input will help me perform better edits in similar situations. Thanks again for your insight and local knowledge.
Gazer75 (2023-01-16 15:45:15+00:00): It could be moved out from a relation now yes. At the time I originally mapped it, the station only included the north part and thus the north building was partially the outer way. Didn't bother moving it out from the relation and just changed the fenced area when they expanded the station.
Things may change as they continue to renew the station. A relation might be needed still as there will probably be a physical separation of regional (66-132kV) and transmission section of the station in the future. The TSO, Statnett, will most likely only be responsible for the 420kV part later on.
It's happening all over Norway as stations get upgraded and changed due to new regulations.
Statnett is basically taking over responsibility for anything 300kV and above, unless 132kV is the highest, like in som northern parts of Norway.
DeltA_Shok (2023-01-17 09:02:51+00:00): Hi Gazer75, sounds good. I have removed the multipolygon and transferred all tags to the existing polygon. Thanks for your insight about this substation.
DavidKarlas (2022-12-14 07:22:30+00:00): I believe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13538493 became broken with this change, can you check?
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2022-12-14 07:27:05+00:00): Hi, DavidKarlas
thank you for telling me. Sorry for my mistake. I'll immediately check the dat and fix it. Thank you.
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-14 17:56:30+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
czubi (2023-04-05 12:41:05+00:00): Der name "Wilderer-Pfad" kommt nur an die Relation, nicht an den Weg selbst, hab ich nochmal eingebessert
jeslop (2022-12-14 09:06:21+00:00): Hola deporteslorca, bienvenido a OSM. El esquema de etiquetado que has seguido con los nombres no es el correcto en OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names

Lo he corregido.

Saludos,
Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
NorthCrab (2022-12-14 08:39:26+00:00): Witamy na OpenStreetMap!

Usunąłem notatki które były umieszczone na tych drogach "	remont drogi". Zamieniłem także ten odcinek drogi na residential https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33030832/history ponieważ 	tertiary tutaj nie pasuje.

Więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-16 11:42:32+00:00): Witaj, mam małą sugestię. Jeśli zaznaczony odcinek drogi jest przejezdny to może przydałoby się tam dodać nową linię - https://i.imgur.com/cxHyXNG.png
KalafiorWWA (2022-12-16 22:09:25+00:00): Zdjęcie satelitarne jest nieaktualne. Działka po której przebiegała droga została częściowo zagospodarowana.
NorthCrab (2022-12-17 09:30:42+00:00): Okej Dzięki!
NorthCrab (2022-12-17 09:31:21+00:00): PS. nie zdjęcia satelitarne a zdjęcia lotnicze ;-)
PT-53 (2022-12-15 07:44:42+00:00): Hallo Ingenieurbüro Reuder,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast Deine Firmendaten an den Adressknoten angehängt. Besser wäre es einen eigenen Firmenknoten (POI) anzulegen und die Firmendaten (incl. Adresse) dort einzutragen.
Auch könnte die Firma-Tätigkeit mit
- office=engineer
vermutlich genauer beschrieben werden.
Siehe Wiki:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office?uselang=de
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dengineer

Machst Du das oder soll ich das für Dich übernehmen?

Grüße vom Fuße des Bussen

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-12-16 10:46:44+00:00): Hallo Ingenieurbüro Reuder, 
Du hast zwischenzeitlich das Merkmal office abgeändert auf
- office=ingenierbüro_für_technische_gebäudeausrüstung
Das war falsch!
Bitte lies die verlinkten Wiki-Seiten durch und halte Dich daran und berücksichtige auch meine andere Anmerkung.
Grüße
PS:
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.