piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2020-02-27 22:14:40+00:00): hola gracias por mapear.
te cambio el 'neighbourhood' (barrio) de La Raya en 'village' (pueblo).
П3тр0виЧъ (2018-07-14 11:12:01+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Названия "Гаражи", "Кладбище" и т.п. вносить в name не нужно.
Minh Nguyen (2018-07-14 04:49:30+00:00): Thanks for these changes. Note that the businesses in a single strip mall building should be mapped as standalone points near the center of the business, if possible. If you’d like to map the entrances, there’s a separate preset for building entrances (which also lets you indicate which entrance is the main entrance).
Something B (2018-07-13 22:09:19+00:00): P.S. Имелось ввиду добавление адреса.
sergeybe (2018-07-14 05:45:00+00:00): Адовая правка :)
Something B (2018-07-14 21:13:42+00:00): Получилось случайно при вводе "Адрес".
eggie (2018-07-13 22:21:50+00:00): Hans, emailadres en website zijn nog blijven staan hier. Was dat de bedoeling?
Dit was je edit: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60701379
alexey_zakharenkov (2018-08-14 19:35:59+00:00): Hello. Why do You think this intersection needs links? There's no corresponding road marking or other separation.
GeoidDude (2018-08-14 23:01:10+00:00): Thank you for letting me know. I have removed the links from the intersection.
Frans S (2018-08-11 11:12:41+00:00): Hi,  After reviewing tasks where you have mapped buildings, I notices that you regularly map buildings oversized.  Please map as close to the image of buildings in future mappings.  Thanks
dsmorris (2018-08-14 08:57:54+00:00): Understood, thank you for the feedback.
Glassman (2018-07-14 01:54:01+00:00): It looks like you added an apartment in the middle of the road. I'm going to remove since its likely not there. I'll send you some info if you want to contribute to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60701709
abakus_uploader (2018-07-14 22:31:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2018-07-13 23:13:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
adrianojbr (2019-01-23 23:54:56+00:00): o teste incluído em https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5758828102 já foi concluído?
Fidelis Assis (2019-02-03 13:38:09+00:00): Não sei dizer, não fui eu que incluí esse teste.
adrianojbr (2019-02-04 13:34:34+00:00): verdade. me cafundi. o changeset correto é esse https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60691001. vlw.
viloan (2018-07-13 23:46:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
freebeer (2018-08-23 07:30:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61911671 where the changeset comment is: changeset erroneously deleted path referred to by https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/287312 , as well as observation point, mapped a month after the note was opened.
Glassman (2018-07-14 02:01:08+00:00): FYI - we usually like to keep existing features even if the geometry changes - it helps keep a history of objects. In this case you could have just realigned the existing streets and added the new ones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60702638
Swankypant (2018-07-14 02:29:42+00:00): Good tip. thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-15 03:25:18+00:00): That's a little better, but close attention to precision is very useful in tight spaces like universities.  I've refined the building geometry on campus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60702668
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-07-31 22:45:00+00:00): Você mapeou caminhos de pedestres passando por cima de casas, como aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607820790/history Porque fez isso?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-07-31 22:46:12+00:00): Ok, eu vi que foi criado um parque no local. Bom mapeamento!
Polarbear (2020-03-30 16:01:33+00:00): Hi RoterEmil,
was ist denn ein "pseudo-pedestrian", z.B. in 
r6866155 ?
Hintergrund meiner Frage ist, dass Carto grade diskutiert, area=yes auf highway=footway nicht mehr zu rendern.
Polarbear (2020-03-30 16:20:12+00:00): https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/4096
user_5359 (2018-07-14 04:20:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-15 03:27:15+00:00): Pretty close, though name=. is almost certainly not accurate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60702947
user_5359 (2018-07-14 04:19:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short hint: For an address we use the keys addr:street and addr:hosuenumber.
freebeer (2019-02-17 17:50:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67286997 where the changeset comment is: delete fake pokemon go parks and other objects that do not reflect the reality which osm limits to be mapped
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-15 03:54:48+00:00): ways need to connect at a node to be routable, and oneway=yes should be added when the way is one-way.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60703392
felipeeugenio (2018-07-14 22:31:59+00:00): Hola Javiera
El lubricentro es una bomba de bencina realmente? tiene pinta de ser un lugar para cambiar aceite, con lo que se tendría que usar otro tag
felipeeugenio (2018-07-14 22:33:41+00:00): Hola Javiera. por favoe no borrar los tags que ya hay en las edificaciones. Si necesitas saber mas sobre que cosas usar en cada elemento te ruego por favor contactarme. Feliz de ayudarte
Minh Nguyen (2018-07-14 22:17:17+00:00): It’s probably best to keep landcover like natural=wood separate from the road network and other landuses, since they can often overlap with landuse=residential etc. Also, remember to map church buildings as amenity=place_of_worship, even if the church grounds are tagged landuse=religious.
viloan (2018-07-14 02:42:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-07-14 02:58:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-07-14 03:02:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
felipeeugenio (2018-07-14 22:37:50+00:00): Hola Javiera. Intenté entender la situacion del parque estadio. Entiendo que el estadio municipal es un recinto (al norte) y el parque es otro (al sur). y que el camino del medio forma parte del estadio. Es asi?.
saludos
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-15 03:58:11+00:00): Not all of these appear to be university type buildings, some are definitely residential or retail...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60703727
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-15 03:58:54+00:00): landuse should only contain the land used, not intervening streets or unrelated areas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60703764
user_3022894 (2018-08-22 12:38:44+00:00): Hi toophony,
die vier Nebengebäude der Herz-Jesu-Kirche: Ich bezweifle, dass das freistehende Einfamilienhäuser (building=detached) sind. Ich weiß jetzt nicht, wie das bei StreetComplete deutlich gemacht wird. Allerdings kann "freistehend" ja schon mal nicht stimmen...
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-15 04:03:58+00:00): these named landuse=residential housing developments would be better tagged as place=neighborhood instead.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60704309
HOLT CAT Austin (2018-07-14 04:37:35+00:00): HOLT Crane and Equipment Houston
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
iriman (2018-07-21 17:29:56+00:00): سلام، من امروز اتفاقی با خبری در تلویزیون با پارس‌آباد آشنا شدم. توی نقشه دیدم اسمش شده پارسا آباد. چون اسم رسمی این شهر پارس‌آباد است (دلایلم در پایان پیام) بهتر است نام پارس‌آباد را در تگ
name
 بگذاریم و پارساآباد را در تگ 
old_name
بگذاریم. نام انگلیسی قدیمی را هم در تگ
en:old_name
می‌توانیم بگذاریم. 

http://gndb.ncc.org.ir/Pages/jpgMaps.aspx?end=NBbjy+Lsdys=&la=47.9115701&Fie=39.64628382

https://moghanshahr.com/مقالات-بیندگان/مقالات-ادبي-و-فرهنگي/100-1388-09-05-20-35-33
keujfl839237 (2018-08-08 20:42:54+00:00): Hallo
Interpretiere ich deinen Changeset-Kommentar richtig, dass du die Angaben (Name und Höhe) des Gipfels von der Seite gipfelderschweiz.ch übernommen hast? Falls ja, wäre dies eine Urheberrechtsverletzung, die ich leider rückgängig machen müsste. Wir dürfen nur die auf der Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Datasources aufgeführten kompatiblen Datenquellen verwenden.
Gruss
Markus
eggie (2018-07-14 07:50:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-15 08:39:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60727352 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokémon Go parks by Purzbär
mavl (2018-07-23 07:55:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-15 08:39:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60727352 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokémon Go parks by Purzbär
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-29 09:57:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61158822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of imaginary features in Indonesia (railways, toll roads)
willebrord (2018-07-17 13:25:22+00:00): Could you please explain? The summit cross is definitley there and a cross check in other guides/maps confirmed the name (see e.g. "Wien wandert" guide, Rittberger+Knapp 2015, http://www.freytagberndt.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/9783902999023_Innenansicht_01.pdf , S.14)
stefanct (2018-07-17 19:09:59+00:00): Hi willebrord,

there is a guy (apparently called Peter-Paul) who tried really hard to
name the peak in question after himself. He lied on multiple occasions when
questioned about his source and apparently even installed the cross you
linked in the changeset. There have been quite some discussions on how
to deal with him (at the at-talk mailing list) and your change did
spark another one, unfortunately.

All and every reference that is linked to the name "Peter-Paul-Berg"
are directly manufactured by this guy or indirectly derived from his
OSM edits - like your linked reference from freytag&berndt, which has
the OSM attribution directly on the map showing the false name.
willebrord (2018-07-18 11:05:44+00:00): Ah, I see what I got involved in here. ;)
Even though the peak might not have an "official" name I think we already reached the "point of no return": There obviously already is a more or less commonly used name for it; we can find "Peter-Paul-Berg" in printed guides [1] and maps [1], other online maps [2] that partly base on OSM data, hiking reports [3,4], mountain panoramas [5], mountain weather forecast [6].
It does not matter that all this (might) date(s) back to the original "Peter-Paul-Berg" entry a couple of years ago - now the name is here and probably will stay here. The only thing we can decide is if we want to include this information in OSM as well.
And since the peak does not have an "official" name in my opinion we cannot say "Peter-Paul-Berg" is "the false name" per se; there are various comparable (regarding the history of the naming and the topographic prominence) precedents (e.g. "Hoher Ge" [7], "Sperkhermstein") in the the Wienerwald region that are included in OSM with their "unofficial" names (since they do not have any "official" name too).
Thus, following the OSM "good practice" guidelines [8,9] I personally think this name should certainly be included as well.

tl;dr
I think there is no point in hiding relevant information from the OSM user only due to the fact that the name is not "official".

[1] "Wien wandert" guide, Rittberger+Knapp 2015, http://www.freytagberndt.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/9783902999023_Innenansicht_01.pdf , p14
[2] https://www.strava.com/segments/7421364
[3] http://www.gipfeltreffen.at/forum/gipfeltreffen/alpinoptikum/gipfelquiz/84285-peter-paul-berg-494m-wienerwald-5620
[4] http://www.inntranetz.at/galerie/touren/2016/latisberg.html
[5] http://mapio.net/pic/p-76813516/
[6] http://www.metgis.com/de/bergwetter/peter-paul-berg.html
[7] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weissenbach_bei_M%C3%B6dling#Hoher_Ge
[8] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground
[9] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule
freebeer (2018-07-18 16:43:42+00:00): Hallo willebrord,
When researching this issue some years back, every single reference i could find all linked back to osm data.
for a legitimate name, i expect to be able to find some mention that is completely independent.
that automated weather services and the like have dumped osm with errors, means it is no surprise that these errors can be found in realty  listings or weather reports for misspellings or totally bogus names.
i see this when attempting to research obvious US TIGER data errors for a popularity check, where worse, TIGER was used by google and directly by other services.
Just as osm seeks to obtain correct data, jt should not keep around the bogus data that can still be found elsewhere, cached in print, in outdated maps.me dumps, or in unvetted unmaintained database dumps.  osm has reached the point it is taken too seriously to allow that.  the amount of undiscovered pokemon fake data is a threat as much as this.
it is impressive to see that osm is no longer a niche product, but that means to me the integrity of osm data is that much more important, and osm cannot simply give in to accepting errors that have made it public here but nowhere officially.
it is not so much that the name is not official, but it sees no use outside of osm circles, not even by a portion of the public, and deserves to be handled like other osm fiction.
if that makes any sense.
willebrord (2018-07-19 09:55:13+00:00): I beg to differ. The situation here is completely different: This is _not_ a "fictional" place. The peak exists in real world, can be identified [5, see reference above] as a peak in real world (even without the now installed summit cross) and is even marked so in OSM.
The only "problem" is that it has no official name. In these cases, the commonly accepted procedure historically was to give it the name that the first person claims. Apparently someone did that at least 6(!) years ago and as a consequence this very name spread across the internet [2-6] and even on printed maps [1]. Personally, I see this as a modern version of "shouting a new name at the market square".
In fact, I know plenty of people who indeed refer to this peak as "Peter-Paul-Berg" (and I can assure that I am not "peterpp" himself and i do not even know this guy ;) ). In the mountain bike community this name is already well known since in Strava (a very popular social network for cyclists) it is the most(!) prominent peak in Vienna due to strange map rendering [10] since a couple of years(!).

This is the only name we have. Why not use it?

[10] https://ibb.co/jEW8my
stefanct (2018-07-19 22:00:32+00:00): the place exists but the name does not. as explained above *all* references are directly from osm/peterpp which actually shows how important it is to ensure good data quality. [5] for example was a picture uploaded by peterpp to wikimedia commons which got removed from there (because of the peak in question) and will vanish from the net eventually (hopefully). i don't know strava but if they are using outdated osm data (else the name could only be visible relatively shortly) and some users fell for that this is no reason to prolong their fallacy. neither [8] nor [9] really apply here either (their is no dispute between governmental bodies or different sources). apart from all of that i would additional argue that the proposed name should not be used due to general prevention (Generalprävention), i.e. to show potential other vandals that faking names (i presume you agree as well that this started as a fake) is futile.

not every peak needs or has a name, but if people want to give this one a name it should be original and anything but the fake name. maybe even your community can come up with and establish a more suitable name :)
willebrord (2018-07-20 14:12:10+00:00): No, I do not agree that "this started as a fake"! This peak did not have any name and following the commonly accepted procedure someone successfully gave it a name and spread the name. That's it.
The discussion is not about if it is acceptable _how_ "Peter-Paul-Berg" got its name! This is irrelevant. _Now_ it is too late for "general prevention", it would just be stubbornness.
Only because you are obviously still mad at "peterpp" does not mean that we should not use an established name.
Who are we to judge if a peak "needs a name" or if an already established name is "suitable" (Are these [11] "suitable" names?)? In my opinion this is pretty pretentious.
"On the Ground Rule: If the dispute can not be resolved through discussion, then the simple default rule is whatever name, designation, etc are used by the people on the ground at that location are used in the non-localized tags." [9, see references above]
Following this rule I will undo your changes to make my point of view clear.

[11] https://www.blog.tirol/2017/06/tiroler-gipfel-und-ihre-namen/
stefanct (2018-07-20 14:31:35+00:00): If you think adding a name tag to OSM with some arbitrary value that nobody but the person itself is aware of at the time is "a commonly accepted procedure" to establish a name for a landmark than I seriously doubt that you should edit any collaborative worldwide content at all. Also, there is still 0 proof that the name is used by anybody but two anonymous OSM users with few contributions. Thus if you want to apply [9] the peak does not have a name because nobody in the vicinity knows it by any name.

The discussion about the topic at hand on the respective mailing list is pretty clear. Please don't start another futile edit war.