piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
Self-Perfection (2022-04-22 14:54:00+00:00): Здравствуйте! Скажите, мост https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050033252 из этого пакета правок действительно визуально похож на https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge=boardwalk ? Это довольно специфичный тег.
arcturusss (2022-04-22 21:10:27+00:00): Упс, ошибочка вышла. Спасибо за замечание, исправил.
user4816003805 (2022-04-27 20:14:31+00:00): It looks like some discussion takes place at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111082334

It doesn't seem like there was false information but rather a disagreement in how to tag "access" in paid ticket areas.
You might consider asking the changeset author about their changes, and waiting a few days for a response, rather than immediately reverting. Totally up to you, though.

I'm not super familiar with this type of routing, though. Out of curiosity, and for my own future benefit, is there a tool you're using to catch these problematic routing changes? Thanks!
Frans S (2022-04-08 10:29:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119439984
akadouri (2022-04-14 01:58:42+00:00): Both of these features have "opening_date" tags that have passed (fall 2021). Do you know if there's a new expected date?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12671435
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050046245#map=19/40.72297/-73.93992
TheBestIdea (2022-04-14 03:06:12+00:00): I have not heard any official (or unofficial for that matter) update. Maybe we should just remove the "opening_date" tags?
akadouri (2022-04-14 04:21:42+00:00): Yeah I'd just remove them.
TheBestIdea (2022-04-14 17:30:32+00:00): Done 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119722365
olo81 (2022-12-06 21:13:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9649743197/
Wymyślona nazwa do usunięcia.  Brak w wykazie nazw PRNG. 
Chyba że zostanie podane źródło? 

Proszę opisywać swoje edycje, a nie umieszczać stałego komentarza do wszystkich edycji.
NorthCrab (2022-12-07 02:08:58+00:00): ^ może po prostu jest tak nazywana lokalnie?
olo81 (2022-12-07 03:54:37+00:00): Dwa razy ? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119440467
olo81 (2022-12-07 03:57:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.32736&mlon=19.13089#map=18/50.32736/19.13089
NorthCrab (2022-12-07 08:20:28+00:00): No w sumie patrząc że obok nie ma żadnego zamku to ta 2ga pozycja ma większy sens:D
Emilius123 (2022-04-07 19:19:43+00:00): Hi, Casper,

You seem to do some general high-quality armchair mapping here, achieving levels of quality, most other mappers cannot achieve.

Would you mind telling me, what kind of armchair you are using? Make and model? Date of purchase?
Other relevant information?

Thank you, have a good day.
user_5359 (2022-04-08 05:47:21+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114837560
Mordechai23 (2022-04-08 13:58:37+00:00): Primo - to że się zatrzymują 2 razy to nic nie udowadnia - ta zmiana pojawiła się dopiero w 2019, 4 lata po remoncie. Jest to zmiana czysto techniczna, mająca na celu ułatwić wymianę pasażerów.

Secundo - 4 słupki słupki są po to, by skrócić drogę do najbliższego rozkładu. Nr słupka jest ten sam, nazwa ta sama, rozkład ten sam, linie tramwajowe te same. Tu są pod każdym względem 2 przystanki.
legofahrrad (2022-04-08 23:00:44+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für den Beitrag zu OpenStreetMap!
Beim Bearbeiten sind dir in Emden ein paar Wege verrutscht. Das passiert im iD-Editor relativ schnell, da solltest du besser aufpassen. ;)
Ich habe nun den Änderungssatz zurückgesetzt, allerdings die Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung beibehalten.
Viele Grüße!
Bei Fragen gerne hier schreiben, ich helfe gerne ;)
Palolo (2022-04-13 14:31:15+00:00): @jschraivogel Thank you for your contributions to OSM in Tanzania, we appreciate the help. Please keep up the good work.
larsalonian (2022-04-18 07:10:53+00:00): Hi, remember to use Q to orthogonalize buildings. Use shortcut Q in iD, or S in JOSM.
MarbleRock (2022-04-21 16:15:34+00:00): Hi, area of the settlement did not change. It is obviously mistake in census because 251 can't live in two houses.

I think cause of this mistake is that people which censused themselves online mistook settlement Botinec and neighborhood Botinec.

Anyways, I changed it back to how it was and left a node.
user_5359 (2022-04-08 05:54:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1050085295/history. a building is marked with the key building (instead Building) and without area=yes (this is included with building)
mcliquid (2022-04-08 14:15:43+00:00): Hallo Wulz, ich bin gerade über BRouter suspects auf deine Änderung an der Bleiberger Straße gestoßen. (https://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/Austria/all/831548790113862090)

Verläuft die Landesstraße an dieser Stelle tatsächlich nebeneinander mit zwei Schnittstellen und überkreuzt sich dann mit einer Brücke und endet als Fußpfad im Wald?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883129086

Zumindest auf dem aktuellen Luftbild kann ich diesen Verlauf nicht nachvollziehen. Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung.
Langlaeufer (2022-04-08 20:32:38+00:00): Danke für die Korrekturen
Frans S (2022-04-14 14:43:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are rather accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119442868
mcliquid (2022-04-08 14:15:52+00:00): Hallo Wulz, ich bin gerade über BRouter suspects auf deine Änderung an der Bleiberger Straße gestoßen. (https://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/Austria/all/831548790113862090)

Verläuft die Landesstraße an dieser Stelle tatsächlich nebeneinander mit zwei Schnittstellen und überkreuzt sich dann mit einer Brücke und endet als Fußpfad im Wald?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883129086

Zumindest auf dem aktuellen Luftbild kann ich diesen Verlauf nicht nachvollziehen. Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung.
archpdx (2022-04-09 07:08:42+00:00): Hi,
It looks like this changeset reglues landuse to roads that I'd spent several hours ungluing a couple months ago. In the future, please avoid gluing landuse to roads this as it makes it more difficult to edit the map in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119443112
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
TravelingEditor (2022-06-17 23:33:14+00:00): Looks like Watco has this whole subdivision labelled as 'Agawa Canyon Railroad (ACR)' on their 'System Map' which matches up with the new signs I saw at Hawk Junction.
PT-53 (2022-04-08 08:16:52+00:00): Hallo Katjak12,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Was soll "Die Bestseller Produkte" sein?
Ein Eintrag nur mit name=* und website=* ist unvollständig und macht so keinen Sinn.

Fragende Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
DD1GJ (2022-04-09 19:07:28+00:00): Werbemüll entfernt, Haus und FeWo korrekt eingetragen.
Mordechai23 (2022-04-08 13:26:45+00:00): kamienice to teren zamieszkany jak każdy inny. Nie ustawiłem też residential na ratuszu - nawet nie patrzysz co revertujesz
muralito (2022-04-08 02:19:02+00:00): Hola. En realidad no corregiste el etiquetado del jardin, porque al eliminar la etiqueta amenity=kindergarden literalmente eliminaste el jardin como funcion. Ver wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten
Azufre (2022-04-10 00:27:22+00:00): Hola. No sabia lo del jardín como función, queria crear 2 etiquetas para el jardín como edificio y otra como establecimiento, pero me olvidé de poner la otra. Gracias por avisarme, ni bien pueda pongo la etiqueta de amenity=kindergarden
MxxCon (2022-04-08 02:12:20+00:00): Residential construction in the middle of the road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119444409
daniel_solow (2022-04-11 01:08:00+00:00): Hey I realized that was going to seem odd. This is a street that was closed off for several weeks. Its a regular 'residential' street but didn't see a construction tag that made perfect sense
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119444409
MxxCon (2022-04-11 02:07:44+00:00): Perhaps it's better to just add barrier nodes on the road and tag segment between barriers with appropriate access tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119444409
SomeoneElse (2022-04-16 09:15:37+00:00): I've asked about this licence on talk-ca .  The suggestion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2022-April/010401.html is that "not
a suitable OSM import data license".  I would suggest that you discuss the use of this licence there.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-07 21:31:53+00:00): Please add Spice World Winnipeg, 137 Marion Street, Winnipeg
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
iandees (2022-04-07 22:09:33+00:00): Thanks for doing this! I saw these when I was tracing buildings a while ago but forgot to delete them. It's been nagging at me for a while and I couldn't remember where they were!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119445036
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
V-Li (2022-04-08 06:19:02+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, schön, dass du etwas beiträgst. Vielleicht möchtest du deine Änderungskommentare ein wenig ausführlicher gestalten, das erhöht die Übersicht.  Wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich einfach.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-07 22:04:49+00:00): see here: https://www.ctvnews.ca/polopoly_fs/1.5156992.1603406296!/httpImage/image.png_gen/derivatives/landscape_620/image.png
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-07 22:05:11+00:00): no buildings left
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-07 22:29:17+00:00): if i were to go here right now, there would be no buildings there
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-07 22:07:14+00:00): now looks like this
https://images.thestar.com/xpU9Sk07kK3aBjlC50e5blZaiSs=/650x650/smart/filters:cb(2700061000)/https://www.thestar.com/content/dam/localcommunities/burlington_post/news/2021/05/02/such-a-well-known-place-this-burlington-restaurant-has-been-closed-for-some-time-and-longtime-customers-are-disappointed/10386139_SwissChaletClosed.JPG
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:11:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 23:10:05+00:00): not right, Winnipeg is once again without Swiss Chalet. The chain restaurant's 1663 Kenaston Blvd. location has closed, marking the end of the rotisserie chicken eatery's stay in the city — for now, at least. The closure comes after the Swiss Chalet at 946 Corydon Ave., along with Harvey's, permanently shut its doors. please revert this to version before, as you are redoing a mistake.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 23:10:43+00:00): "The Company continues to execute the planned closures of restaurants that no longer fit its long-term strategic plan," it wrote in its second quarter report.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 23:11:24+00:00): not swiss chalet anymore, see https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/business/swiss-chalet-on-kenaston-closes-575626252.html
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 23:11:45+00:00): not true
ZinaidaZ (2022-04-11 10:16:57+00:00): Добрый день! Подскажите, зачем из названия поселка совхоза Первомайский Вы убрали слово "посёлок"?
Согласно вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE "посёлок" - это неотъемлемая часть названия
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-07 22:18:54+00:00): home outfitters went bankrupt and no longer exists, bowring went bankrupt and no longer exists, bombay went bankrupt and no longer exists, reebok closed down, la senza closed down
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:17:58+00:00): mexx went bankrupt, laura closed down and moved to the outlet mall, reitmans closed down, addition elle no longer has any stores in Winnipeg, roots moved to the outlet mall, so has tommy hilfiger, mark's moved to in front of canadian tire, home outfitters
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:19:15+00:00): I am a local so i know this as a fact, why revert data that is proven to be correct
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.