piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2016-10-24 19:18:28+00:00): Nope. That article specifically says that only the navigational lights (the seamark:* stuff) should be on a node and there's none of that here (maybe because this lighthouse is no longer used for it's original purpose)
Jenseblume (2016-10-24 19:31:49+00:00): You did not read my text.
The POIs neareby (Café, toilettes and adresses) are mapped properly.
Hjart (2016-10-24 19:42:02+00:00): What text did I not read? 
The cafe etc. are mapped as nodes only, because in some cases it's more convenient and in other cases because you can't always tell whether the surrounding building is used for that purpose only. The lighthouse is currently mapped as a polygon only. Both is correct.
Hjart (2016-10-24 20:03:44+00:00): I also did happen to test my Garmin gpsmap 62 (again) just to make sure. It has no problem finding objects mapped (in OSM) as polygons.
LLlypuk82 (2016-10-28 17:18:37+00:00): пожалуйста, рукаоводствуйтесь принятым форматом записи адресов: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
RafalR (2016-11-01 08:03:29+00:00): Eurobank zapisujemy razem.
user_5359 (2016-10-24 18:46:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add two event information, which do not belong to OSM!
Self-Perfection (2016-10-25 11:04:39+00:00): Вы в этой правке создали точку шиномонтажа.

Обратите внимание, что в этом здании уже 4 месяца назад обозначили шиномонтаж https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4277856760

Это вторая правка подряд от вас, в которой вы создаёте дубль давно существующего объекта. Может быть вы их не видите, потому что у вас в MAPS.ME карты устаревшие? Пожалуйста проверяйте перед созданием новых объектов, что у вас свежие карты. Для этого нужно зайти в приложении в список установленных карт и проверить, не предлагается ли обновление.
maraf24 (2016-10-25 06:52:03+00:00): Nie wystarczy tylko wpisać nazwę drodze w OSM. Jeszcze należy ustalić jak daleko sięga nazwa i w odpowiednim miejscu podzielić.
GerdP (2017-08-25 05:48:11+00:00): Hi!
Please don't use the tag highway=residential_link, this type doesn't "exist". See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559
freeExec (2016-10-25 06:08:40+00:00): Если действительно было не правильно указан номер отделения, то доведите дело до конца и в поле ref тоже нужно изменить.
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:56:26+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
trigpoint (2016-10-24 16:32:13+00:00): I really doubt that this bus stop has been re-named as 102 Epsom High Street, I am reverting this change
dudka (2016-10-26 20:36:35+00:00): ще декільком лініям треба додати service=spur

http://pavlo-dudka.github.io/osm-pg-tests/test.html?map?railway.islands.main#zoom=18&lat=48.672935&lon=39.4632
Opaky (2017-08-12 01:52:34+00:00): Is there a reason why you changed boundary admin levels from 8 to 9? According to this table, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative, settlements admin boundary level should be 8.
muralito (2016-10-25 00:05:45+00:00): Los alpine_hut son para refugios en las montañas.

¿que es lo que estas queriendo mapear?
maraf24 (2016-10-24 21:13:36+00:00): You can't delete node like this, you need to unglue first, delete, then merge connecting roads.
yurasi (2016-10-25 15:47:51+00:00): Hi maraf24
Thank you for notifying and connecting this road, and if you know better this place it would be great if you can also add the bridge part to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205611094 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205612078 as this help us to built a better map.
maraf24 (2016-10-25 18:06:32+00:00): I'm quite sure these two are not bridges, ramps probably.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-08-08 20:48:20+00:00): Byłbym wdzięczny za niezmienianie nazw stacji BP. W toku dyskusji na forum dawno temu, że one mają się nazywać tak, jak BP je ponazywało.
eggie (2017-11-05 15:55:04+00:00): Alsnog ...Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
dudka (2016-10-25 20:41:57+00:00): ця дорога мабуть випадково стала service? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297019337/history
Zcor (2016-10-26 10:04:27+00:00): Дивно, я б її не змінював на service.
Якось випадково сталось
user_5359 (2016-10-24 18:36:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
Think of Home (2016-10-26 19:08:59+00:00): Cześć,
kiedy ostatnio byłeś w tej okolicy?? Usunąłeś cały nowy odcinek Skarbka z gór bez najmniejszego pytania, ani sprawdzenia historii jego edycji. Na tej podstawie można łatwo byłoby wywnioskować, że ulica została już jakiś czas temu otwarta.
Constable (2016-10-25 07:11:47+00:00): Questa è una mappa non un diario personale. Se aggiungi un oggetto sei pregato di non inserire commenti personali come "da vedere".
Grazie
Constable (2016-10-25 07:12:26+00:00): Ovviamente mi riferisco a questo nodo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2291776061
Provvedo a rimuovere la scritta
user_5359 (2016-10-24 18:35:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice, that a closed way with aera=yes (and no other keys) is useless. Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, it can be helpful
muralito (2016-10-25 00:13:00+00:00): Hola. ¿Que tipo de atraccion es esta?
Commodoortje (2017-05-05 22:32:18+00:00): Wat bedoel je met barrier=yes op dit stukje struikgewas?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449252711
Dvdb-84 (2017-05-06 05:26:34+00:00): dit zijn hoog (50cm)  gegooide heggen in grote vlakken bedoelt als versiering en als Barrier. de tag barrier=yes staat er op omdat ik zeker wilde weten dat je daar niet kan lopen.
Commodoortje (2017-05-06 07:25:48+00:00): Je tagt de heg nu als volgt:
barrier=yes
leaf_type=needleleaved
natural=scrub
.
Probeer logisch te denken, dan kom je tot de volgende tagging:
barrier=hedge (dit heeft geen doorgang, mits er een entrance tag geplaatst wordt met een highway=* 
broadleaved is (volgens mij) alleen voor bomen bedoeld. 
.
Ik merk op dat je wel heel erg in detail treedt.
Commodoortje (2017-05-07 10:31:18+00:00): Landuse losgemaakt van footway.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48470736
Als het een heg is, kun je beter barrier=hedge taggen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dhedge
Commodoortje (2017-05-07 20:21:48+00:00): wegen losgemaakt van landuse, tevens kleine verbeteringen aangebracht.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48484531
Hjart (2016-10-24 18:27:49+00:00): "paved" is usually defined as asphalt or similar (more durable than gravel or dirt). I've fixed it though.
intschutschuna (2016-10-24 20:23:04+00:00): Bitte keine Flächen (z.B. landuse) mit Linien (z.B. highway) verbinden! Das erschwert die Bearbeitbarkeit enorm!
ma-rt-in (2016-10-25 08:48:16+00:00): Apotheke als name zu benutzen ist unnötig
hatul (2021-07-13 07:54:11+00:00): הקצה המזרחי של טיילת חרמון לא מתחבר לשום מקום או שסתם חסר במפה?
eric22 (2021-07-13 20:06:22+00:00): מסתבר שזה מתחבר. מאתר גוגל מפס נראה שזה אכן מתחבר, רק שאסור לנו להעתיק משם למפה שלנו.
hatul (2021-07-13 21:11:33+00:00): כן, מתחבר מערבית לצומת. אני אחפש תצ״ל שאפשר לראות בדיוק איפה.
Sandal man (2021-07-15 21:11:37+00:00): Hola, olvidaste nombrar las carreteras
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449256949

Saludos Jan
mosstreet (2016-10-25 19:35:49+00:00): any reason to change something that is not created? maybe it's worth to at least something to do?
Sanniu (2017-03-29 13:41:43+00:00): Node: טבע עירוני שביל סובב חריש  (4226356752) you killed leisure=park. Is it intentional?
eric22 (2017-03-29 20:42:48+00:00): I was probably thinking that a park should be an area, not a point. Looking at it right now, there is an area there. It's a "meadow" not a "park", but as far as I can tell that is accurate since the land is not developed in any way. Feel free to change if you know otherwise.
nikiforov (2018-05-07 15:40:23+00:00): Може, краще адреси вказати саме на полігонах будинків, а не точками?
jeka p (2018-05-08 18:36:29+00:00): Привіт! обидва варіанти однаково поширені і мають свої переваги та недоліки. сам не знаю, як краще...
MrMoehritz (2016-10-25 15:19:27+00:00): Hey Jiver,

wie geschlossen ist denn die Praxis? :-) Wäre vielleicht der disused: tag die bessere Lösung als eine Löschung?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:

Beste Grüße
Jiver (2016-10-25 15:31:04+00:00): Vor zwei Jahren aus Altersgründen aufgegeben. Ohne Nachfolger. 
Reicht das?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-07-15 13:48:09+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1455376 ?
mavl (2016-10-25 17:44:32+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Вы изменили название аптеки с «+36,6» на «Магазин "Союз"». Получились несогласованные данные. С одной стороны, это по-прежнему аптека. А с другой стороны, это магазин. Напишите, пожалуйста, что сейчас представляет собой этот объект: магазин или аптеку?
SK53 (2017-01-15 14:00:11+00:00): Slightly complicated one: Raw Head & the hut across the road aren't really residential areas, but can't think what else can be used to mark them. From a purely financial view they're commercial as the climbing clubs have to pay business rates, but that ain't right either. Perhaps some kind of sub-tag of residential along the lines of tourism.
redrace (2016-10-26 11:33:14+00:00): HUHU
Hast Du hier die Fahrstreifen am Verteilerkreis ergänzt? Löblich! Allerdings fehlen ein paar der Fahrspuren in den jeweiligen Relationen! Muss das so oder wurden die vergessen. wenn du die vergessen hast fügst Du die noch in die Relation ein!
Schöne Grüße Meik (redrace)
pfg21 (2016-10-28 11:39:39+00:00): А есть ли смысл в тупой транслитерации названий ??
Polarbear (2017-09-22 19:03:24+00:00): landuse sollte nicht auf einer einzelnen Node verwendet werden. Dein erster Ansatz, die Gegenden mit place=neighbourhood zu benennen, war plausibler. 
Repariert.
Heisst wirklich das Wohnviertel "Am Haus Borg", oder ist das nur der dort ohnehin vorhandene Straßenname?
literan (2016-10-25 10:50:02+00:00): почему это вдруг на съезде образовались такие повороты, под 30 градусов? Я там ездил, ничего такого не видел. Все отрисовано по тщательно привязанному проекту организации движения, на фото было видно, что все в этом месте совпадает. Так что я вашу правку откатываю
literan (2016-10-25 10:55:54+00:00): полезное сохранил
PeressenyiRobert (2016-10-25 09:09:46+00:00): Köszi!
Hogy ezt a contact:facebook -ot miért nem találtam?
R
RafalR (2016-11-01 07:48:55+00:00): Hurtownia elektryczna to nie sklep z telefonami (shop=mobile_phone). Poprawione.
wmyrda (2016-10-26 07:40:39+00:00): Umowę podpisano jedynie na odcinek pomiędzy Podkarpacką a S19. Trasy przez Wisłok nikt jeszcze nie będzie budował. Skąd to wziąłeś?
Perimex (2016-10-26 13:04:17+00:00): http://www.rynekinfrastruktury.pl/wiadomosci/rzeszow-rusza-budowa-lacznika-z-s19--55966.html
wmyrda (2016-10-26 19:15:05+00:00): No właśnie należało by przeczytać ze zrozumieniem... Pierwsze zdanie mówi co robią "Skanska może już rozpoczynać prace nad budową łącznika ul. Podkarpackiej w Rzeszowie z węzłem Rzeszów-Wschód. ". Następne jedynie o tym co ta droga, którą obecnie robią umożliwi w przyszłości.
Perimex (2016-10-27 01:36:40+00:00): Dobra jutro skoryguje,ale tekst jest dwuznaczny
RafalR (2016-11-01 07:49:03+00:00): Hurtownia elektryczna to nie sklep z telefonami (shop=mobile_phone). Poprawione.
punya_man (2019-03-01 01:11:21+00:00): Hi karitotp,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 672256820 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'.

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
dbf_ (2016-10-25 21:14:15+00:00): Добрый день, пожалуйста не используйте КАПСЛОК в названиях объектов.
Ambush (2016-10-25 14:18:38+00:00): Что за crossing	zebra ??? ??? Откуда вы это находите???
Minh Nguyen (2016-11-19 19:46:13+00:00): This changeset turned a residential landuse area into a residential street area that covered an entire city. I reverted this change in changeset 43808341.
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:58:42+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Warin61 (2017-03-08 06:18:23+00:00): Frying Pan Road ..is not secondary!!! 
At most it would be 'unclassified .. but on the LPI base map is is a track. Retagged as a track -
Volker Fröhlich (2016-10-24 21:52:15+00:00): Die Quellen sollten geoimage.at; basemap.at sein -- keine survey!
@schoolsagentsi (2016-10-25 01:53:12+00:00): no buildings in this area , did i do the needful any way
SomeoneElse (2016-11-22 14:23:20+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've added some things to the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Are you using "geoMapTool" for that? If so, please stop using it immediately - it is broken.
Please contact OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group in data@osmfoundation.org so that we can explain the problem in more detail.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
Supaplex (2016-10-25 17:57:34+00:00): 操場跑道可以畫得更細緻點，像是陽明高中的跑道
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5621689
seke (2016-10-27 01:36:11+00:00): josm似乎沒有自動畫半圓的工具.只能手動補多一些點.
@schoolsagentsi (2016-10-25 01:51:26+00:00): This area is the most interesting one with very beautiful landscape  compared to the former ave edited.
aharvey (2017-04-07 09:12:51+00:00): What were you trying to do with the parking lot here?

It looks like a multi story parking lot but I don't understand what your tags mean. highway=path but foot=no? parking=underground but no amenity=parking? service=spur? All combined on the same way?

What are you trying to map here?
julcnx (2026-06-16 03:59:36+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
Howpper (2016-10-26 16:21:18+00:00): I see what you mean, the part north of I-90 was once part of the park, but no longer officially is, but according to "https://maps.spokanecity.org/", the part north of Liberty Park Place is part of the park. Is this incorrect?
Carnildo (2016-10-26 19:36:58+00:00): Based on the Liberty Park map at https://my.spokanecity.org/parks/finder/, it's not part of the park.

I haven't been to the park recently, but aerial imagery shows the block north of Liberty Park Place as a brown, weed-filled lot, where the area south of the road is well-watered, well-maintained grass.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-25 18:17:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-25 18:10:16+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-25 18:09:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-25 18:08:58+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mavl (2019-01-28 16:50:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-28 16:50:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-28 16:51:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-28 16:51:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 18:07:22+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mavl (2019-01-28 16:51:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-28 16:51:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-28 16:51:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-28 16:51:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:09:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:09:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:09:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
pesec (2016-10-25 05:34:29+00:00): Изменил тип здания с АЗС на АГЗС-АЗС.
Удалил точку АГЗС, т.к. на навигаторе оба эти объекта интереса высвечивались рядом.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:09:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 18:01:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
nammala (2016-10-26 03:56:19+00:00): Hi Rasheka,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting building which exists in the Imagery.

Regards,
nammala
scruss (2016-11-14 18:35:15+00:00): I've restored the building. Looks like an accidental deletion.

Rasheka - welcome to OSM! It's good to know there are other mappers locally.
nammala (2016-11-15 04:28:08+00:00): Thanks scruss
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 17:54:20+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-30 17:10:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 17:51:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 17:50:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359