piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_10901495 (2021-12-30 09:29:43+00:00): Comunque okay d'accordo.
ivanbranco (2022-01-10 21:34:16+00:00): Ciao Martino,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167107594/history

qual è la fonte di questo nome? A me risulta si chiami solo "Via Caduti". Anche lo stradario comunale lo conferma: https://www.comune.arese.mi.it/allegati/41023%5EALLEGATO%20TOPONOMASTICA.pdf
JasonBob (2023-01-27 16:14:48+00:00): You renamed this forested area as "Enchanted Forest". Unless you can provide official documentation that this is its name I am deleting it. Please don't create fictional names for places just because they sound cool
SHARCRASH (2021-12-29 19:56:57+00:00): + surface/tracktype added
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
aceman444 (2021-12-30 20:33:15+00:00): Aha, takze namiesto opravenia problemu ste nazvy uplne odstranili?
Nie, tak sa to nerobi. Nabuduce ked to neviete opravit, vratte do povodneho stavu, alebo nechajte tak.
Teraz ste stratili udaje (nazvy). Esteze to mam v pamati a mozem to vratit, na spravne objekty.

A takisto preco zmeny  building:part=dormitory na building=dormitory? 
Hlavna zasada v OSM je, nemenit znacky, ktorym nerozumiete. Tieto boli uplne spravne, su to len casti budovy. Teraz ste vytvorili budovy v budovach, co je chyba. Divne, ze Vas na to iD editor neupozornil.

Cize v tejto sade zmien je jedina spravna zmena asi ten vymaz tej banky na chodniku. Ostatne vraciam spat. A davajte si vacsi pozor. Dakujem
aceman444 (2021-12-30 20:33:26+00:00): Aha a ta pracovna.
Kabaz (2021-12-31 13:52:37+00:00): Veľmi sa ospravedlňujem, to nebolo mojim zámerom, budem už opatrnejší pri zmenách v takýchto tagoch, len som sa snažil o opravu niečoho, čo sa mi v takom stave nezdalo ideálne zobrazené na mape
aceman444 (2022-01-15 12:31:14+00:00): Nebolo idealne zobrazene, tak ste to uplne odstranili? No to radsej nerobte.
A ked nieco nie je idealne zobrazene, nie vzdy sa s tym da nieco robit. Casto je na algoritme vykreslovania mapy kde sa zobrazi nazov. Podobne, OSM je databaza geografickych objektov, nie mapa. Ma obsahovat objekty tam kde su a s presnymi znackami popisujicimi vlastnosti a typy tychto objektov. Az nasledne si konkretna mapa vyberie, ktore objekty a akym vzhladom ich vykresli, podla svojho tematickeho zamerania a pod. openstreetmap.org je len jednou zo stoviek nahladov na OSM udaje. Nemoze zobrazit uplne vsetko co v databaze je. Niektora ina mapa zase vykresli ine objekty, ktore na osm.org nie su. Napr. turisticke znacky. Pozrite si napr. mapu www.freemap.sk. Takze prosim ziadne zasahy do znaciek, ktorym nerozumiete (na to treba prestudovat wiki.openstreetmap.org), a nemenit znacky, ktore su spravne, len sa zatial napr. nevykresluju (to sa moze v buducnosti zmenit). Dakujem
Geofalke (2021-12-29 20:52:51+00:00): Es wäre sehr nett, wenn opendcc nicht akribisch jedes neue Element in "seiner Region" nochmals mit ein paar Änderungen bedenken würde, während gleich daneben Uralt-Elemente viel dringender eine Aktualisierung nötig hätten.
eggie (2021-12-30 07:44:14+00:00): Dag Sandarr  Langs de Griftdijk zijn bij mijn weten geen parallelfietspaden, maat wel fietssuggestiestroken.
Dus cycleway:both=shared_lane en niet cycleway:both=track  (Dat zijn aanliggende aparte fietspaden)

Ik heb het aangepast

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane

MVG
eggie
Sandarr95 (2021-12-30 12:31:56+00:00): Hoi, thanks voor de review. Ik gebruik de app streetcomplete en de visual bij deze optie was een gedeeld wegdek waar het fietsgedeelte anders gekleurd is, dat zag ik daar ook. Ik zal het voor de volgende keer onthouden dat het dus losse fietspaden moet betreffen.
eggie (2021-12-30 13:04:28+00:00): Hoi.. Ja Streetcomplete blinkt niet uit in onderscheidend vermogen.
Echt losliggende fietspaden worden apart ingetekend als highway=cycleway (drie categorieën)
Zie wiki ..  

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 
De aanliggende fietspaden als cycleway=track (tagging opnemen in de tags van de hoofdrijbaan)
Zo'n rood gekleurde strook met fietsje op wegdek als cycleway=lane en een fietssuggestiestrook (zonder fietsje) als cycleway=shared_lane.
Veel plezier met mappen,
eggie
Nzara (2022-05-11 15:42:35+00:00): Hallo jmarchon

bei diesem Edit sind einige temporäre Folientunnels auf dem Feld als building=greenhouse getagt. (z. B. way 1016670320). Welches Ziel verfolgst du damit?
jmarchon (2022-05-12 15:23:54+00:00): Hallo Nzara,
I believe I have now fixed this in changeset #120894679. Thank you for pointing out my mistakes and making me a better mapper!
Igor Gurzhuenko (2021-12-30 11:47:08+00:00): Фейк - это твоё существование на свете белом, вандал.
mavl (2021-12-31 11:08:29+00:00): Здравствуйте, Igor Gurzhuenko. Прошу не забывать, что понятие "Вандал" имеет своё определение и им не нужно пользоваться просто, если вам что-то не нравится.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BC  
  
Также есть этикет:  

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%AD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%82  
  
Если этот пакет правок что-то делает неправильно, то нужно написать, что именно было сделано неправильно, а не переходить на личности.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
JJIglesias (2021-12-29 23:58:39+00:00): Por Favor DETENTE de MOVER elementos sin tomar en cuanta otros elementos, esta edicion q hiciste ha generado mas de 20 DAÑOS al mapa. El editar en lugares complejos como las ciudades requiere Mapeadores que SEPAN lo q estan haciendo, y mas que ayudar en este momento estas Fastidiando el Mapa.

Por favor ANTES de seguir adelante. sigue los Tutoriales de OSM en:

www.learnosm.org
lasagna (2022-01-09 03:10:23+00:00): Hello,

I see that you changed the names of some streets. I have not surveyed this area, but signs in Streetside imagery show the previous street names and I have not been able to find any information about these new names. What is your source for these changes?

Thanks
lasagna (2022-02-06 07:21:30+00:00): I surveyed the area near the intersection of University Avenue and Park Boulevard today. I found that the street signs for Herbert Street and Centre Street had those names, not your modified names. I did not find any on-the-ground evidence of the names you gave to some alleys (in this changeset, and also your other changeset 63486778).

Therefore, I reverted these changes to street names in changeset 117068828.

Please do not add names (or other tags or features) that are not supported by real-world verifiable information. We are mapping the real world, not your vision of an alternate reality.

Also, it's important to write descriptive comments for your changes ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ).
CAI Stabia (2022-01-03 08:06:18+00:00): Giovanni buongiorno, abbiamo visto che hai modificato il nostro sentiero 338a indirizzandolo verso la sorgente della Lontra invece che verso il 338b.
Purtroppo non è corretto. Il sentiero CAI non è quello da te modificato. Ti preghiamo di ripristinare il tracciato corretto e in linea generale non modificare il tracciato di alcun sentiero CAI in quanto fanno parte del catasto Nazionale dei Sentieri.
Grazie
user_5359 (2021-12-30 11:58:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys!
JJIglesias (2021-12-31 00:03:10+00:00): Do not worry, I already edited her edition, is a Law office. It's typical for newbies to place a lot of tags in spanish. I also sent a welcome message with some advices to her. Thanks
user_14737153 (2021-12-29 21:42:24+00:00): all
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-12-30 12:29:41+00:00): Please provide sources for this information
marczoutendijk (2022-01-05 19:18:15+00:00): Wrong tagging of construction.
Correct is:
highway=construction
construction=residential
CAI Stabia (2022-01-03 08:12:22+00:00): Purtroppo non ci siamo proprio, continui a modificare erroneamente i percorsi dei sentieri del CAI. In questo caso il 338 erroneamente.
Ti preghiamo di ripristinare il percorso dei sentieri CAI. 
Restiamo in attesa di una tua risposta.
nitram1234 (2021-12-31 10:44:01+00:00): Nice work!
mvexel (2022-01-03 00:49:14+00:00): Hi Xephorix,
Could you try to be a little more specific in the description of your changeset, please? This changeset covers quite a large area and a few dozen OSM objects, and it would help other mappers to have something more descriptive than "changed a few things". Thank you!
Patr1k_P (2022-08-11 12:13:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456264391

tuto cestu by nebolo lepsie upravit na Rudolfa Mocka? Jednak tie supisne cisla naokolo patria k tejto ulici a ta povodna ulica nema ziadne supisne,ktore by k nej patrili
aceman444 (2022-10-09 15:11:51+00:00): Ulica je definovana vo VZN 10/2016 (https://cdn-api.bratislava.sk/strapi-homepage/upload/VZN_10_2016_o_urceni_nazvov_novovzniknutych_ulic_v_mestskych_castiach_5e759c0e5e.pdf), ale tam sa javi byt ako vodorovna z vychodu na zapad. V skutocnosti sa zda, ze nikdy nebola postavena. Cize nazov presne toho useku, na ktory sa pytate nie je uplne zrejmy. Chapem, ze Milana Kolibiara nema priradene ziadne adresy, mozno som nazov zachoval len na tomto useku, kedze iny nebol postaveny. Ale ak myslite, ze aj tieto severojuzne ulice sa volaju Rudolfa Mocka, nemam s tym problem. Ani v mnohych zoznamoch ulic Bratislavy sa Milana Kolibiara nenachadza. Ale v niektorych ano, napr. http://files.vlastnawebstranka.websupport.sk/79/5e/795e6c35-3e37-4fb9-9feb-b520344b5755.pdf (na rok 2022!). Alebo ten nazov prehodime na iny objekt, napr. chodnik?
Patr1k_P (2022-10-13 14:18:50+00:00): asi by som to prehodil ako pisete len na ten usek cesty podla toho nakresu...potom sa moze uzavriet aj toto

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3297214
MFlamm (2022-01-05 17:58:43+00:00): Hello, je ne crois pas que le tag cycleway:right:lane=designated correspond à une norme admise de cartographie d'aménagements cyclables ;-) 
Vu les photos prises lors de la cartopartie, je propose de coder cette route en cycleway:right=track
Peux-tu STP corriger cela?
MFlamm (2022-01-05 18:05:38+00:00): Et, pour compléter, on peut ajouter les tags suivants:
sidewalk=left
name=Route des Jeunes
abakus_uploader (2021-12-30 23:32:16+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-01 13:00:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Dmayo305 (2022-01-01 14:54:59+00:00): That's my driveway, and I'm trying to determine differences in enhanced summons on my Tesla if the driveway is mapped vs not.
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-03 07:55:21+00:00): Hi Dmayo305, thanks for your answer.

If it is a driveway you should use not use the residential value.
felipeeugenio (2021-12-30 00:07:04+00:00): Estimado, por favor cuidado con las ediciones. Hay información bastante valiosa, pero pasó a llevar varias cosas que ahora hay que reparar.
Es normal y no es grave y estamos para ayudarle ante cualquier duda, pero por favor vaya de a poco con las ediciones. gracias
CaptainQuetzal (2021-12-30 01:37:43+00:00): Tomaré en cuenta el consejo e iré de a poco con las ediciones. Disculpe si eliminé algunas cosas importantes, pero no encontré mejor forma de añadir calles nuevas sin intervenir lo que ya había. Un gusto ser parte de OSM.
felipeeugenio (2021-12-30 13:00:49+00:00): Gracias por su tiempo y disposición. Al final no era tanto y aproveché de actualizar algunas cosas. Si conoce el sector sus aportes son muy bienvenidos. Puede unirse al chat de la comunidad en Telegram (app similar a whatsapp) en el link https://t.me/OSMcl

saludos cordiales
muchichka_s (2022-02-01 20:10:48+00:00): Привіт. А для чого кладовище з огорожею приклеювати до дороги. Лінія дороги в OSM - середина дороги. Мені здається краще, кладовище з огорожею зробити до фактичної межі, як на супутниковому зображенню. При такому стилі мапінгу, коли все до всього приєднане дуже важко правити якісь об'єкти. Наприклад, я захотів перемістити адмін. межу, а в результаті ламається дорога і поле, які проходять по тих самих точках, що і адмін. межа ...
Frans S (2021-12-31 11:58:11+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most roads and mapped. 
Please review your knowledge hot to tag highways
See this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Roads_and_tracks
Very short pieces or roads leading to buildings nearby ( within view) don't need to be mapped.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115542078
blackboxlogic (2022-01-02 22:39:20+00:00): It looks like there is a cemetery inside a cemetery since you have the same details on a close way and a node. I'd make sure the way had all the details and then delete the node to remove the duplicate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115542222
annajyoung (2022-01-03 15:45:53+00:00): This is the Evergreen Cemetery. There is no cemetery named Phillips-Maine Cemetery in any database.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115542222
blackboxlogic (2022-01-03 16:10:08+00:00): Yes, that is correct. But as you have left it there are now TWO Evergreen Cemeteries. And one is inside the other.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358229359
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819205561
I'm suggesting that there is only one cemetery so there should only be one OSM element representing it.
cserpell (2021-12-30 00:50:09+00:00): Las marcaste todas como máxima 50!
eggie (2021-12-30 07:23:06+00:00): Dag Teek...  Even 'meegekeken'..
Tip. Kijk even voor de juiste tag in de wiki hoe Jeu de Boules toe te voegen als sport=.....
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dboules

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115542628

MVG
eggie
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-30 10:51:34+00:00): Ciao. Non modificare i landuse=residential in place=hamlet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650279605 Il place è già indicato. Ripristino. Ciao, Andrea
MxxCon (2021-12-30 04:30:43+00:00): Hello.
You changed almost 100 things on almost every continent of the world. Can you elaborate what kind of "typo" did you fix?
SekeRob (2021-12-30 11:06:20+00:00): To see 'Seconaria' remaining on an Italian school where it is 'Secondaria', not exactly proof of 'typo' corrections, global at that.

Kindly do this localised in the future, best left to those that have the language as native tongue.
Lee Carré (2021-12-30 19:58:50+00:00): ▪︎http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
▪︎what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ALocalRunner5 (2021-12-30 01:01:00+00:00): How can I undo this edit I mistakenly edited the whole area all the way up to Scituate.
ALocalRunner5 (2021-12-30 01:03:34+00:00): I'm unsure whether I broke it or if the preview isn't work correctly.
ALocalRunner5 (2021-12-30 01:30:54+00:00): I fixed it I changed the broad leaf to needle leaf so in my last edit i fixed that.
jtracey (2022-01-01 04:30:44+00:00): Thanks for the edit! If you're wondering why the island didn't show up on the map, it's because it was still surrounded by water. Basically, for the map to "see" the island, there has to be a chunk of missing water mapped, and we do that by mapping the water as a multipolygon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

While they're ultimately not *that* hard (they're basically just lists of "inner" and "outer" OSM elements that make a shape), they're definitely trickier than most parts of OSM, so if you'd rather keep editing for now without learning about them yet, you'll be fine. I already fixed it here (and changed it to an islet, which is technically what you're supposed to use for small islands like this, though that's also not a big deal). If you would like to learn about it, you can check out that wiki page, and the edit here as an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115618822#map=18/43.50948/-80.49288
Carnildo (2021-12-30 05:37:50+00:00): Is there a short name for the building that's in common use?  "John and Joan Bollier Family Center for Integrated Science and Engineering" is rather unwieldy.
AZZagBoi (2021-12-30 06:18:10+00:00): All the other buildings on campus have the exact names on the map. Gonzaga purposefully chose to name the new building as is. Although, perhaps "Bollier Center for Integrated Science and Engineering" could be used.
Carnildo (2021-12-30 19:31:07+00:00): I've added the full-length name to the "official name" field.  That way, the building can still be found when searching by the full name, and anyone making a custom map has the option of showing it.
user4816003805 (2021-12-30 02:32:41+00:00): Weird. I added more tags, but they didn't go through. Maybe a bug with OsmAnd?
Should also mention outdoor seating, beer, wine, cocktails, vegetarian, vegan. Add website and phone.
ZLima12 (2022-03-31 20:49:46+00:00): Please do not glue together things on different layers. You glued the I-990 bridge to Ellicott Creek Trailway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115544744
ZLima12 (2022-03-31 20:55:27+00:00): I see now that you were doing this because you wanted to show that those parts of the path were covered. I get that, but the wiki page says "Do NOT use [covered=yes]...For objects in tunnels or passing under linear bridge features where vertical ordering is established by layer=* in combination with a suitable tag such as bridge=* or tunnel=*.".

I see that you reverted the covered=yes tagging, but left the nodes glued. I'll unglue them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115544744
MxxCon (2021-12-30 04:38:24+00:00): Hello.
This article documents best practices on how to format phone numbers: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115544901
user_5359 (2021-12-31 18:11:59+00:00): Hello! Please have look on the neweset version of your entry. The language code is part of the value not of the key.
AndersAndersson (2021-12-30 07:02:53+00:00): Det är fortfarande access=no på två av sträckorna. Jag antar att även detta ska tas bort?
Aerond (2021-12-30 08:21:20+00:00): Ah, det stämmer. Ska fixa sen, vilken var den andra?
AndersAndersson (2021-12-30 11:26:45+00:00): Tror det var typ under järnvägen eller i närheten. Men jag kan ha sett fel.
mueschel (2022-01-01 18:39:55+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging of these military areas? Some have a "millitary_service" tag instead of "military_service"  ( "ll" instead of "l").
Hokkosha (2022-01-01 23:30:26+00:00): Hello, mueschel.
Thank you for pointing out the tag error. I fixed these errors in changeset 115654436.
zyphlar (2022-09-02 19:25:29+00:00): Hi Jrpear! As part of my Sonoma County Building/Address Import, I'm updating some building shapes based on county data. Since you created many of the buildings in this area, I wanted to check with you before uploading those changes. You can preview them in JOSM by opening the sample-1007.osm file here: 

https://github.com/zyphlar/sonoma-import/tree/latest_data/reference
jrpear (2022-09-04 01:23:06+00:00): Hmm sample-1007.osm seems contain data for a different area (NW of this changeset). The data looks good though, you've done a great job!
zyphlar (2022-09-04 01:32:34+00:00): Thanks! Yeah I picked a slightly more recent changeset to comment on as I was going thru various local editors and their contributions.
ivanbranco (2021-12-31 10:46:08+00:00): Hi Mohammed,

place=madampara is not a valid value. You can use addr:city=* to add the city location. Can you fix this and the other invalid place tag you added please?

You can find them here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eED
ivanbranco (2021-12-31 10:51:00+00:00): Also I noticed other users adding amenity=childcare having the same problem with wrong place=* values. Is this a import project going on?
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-01 13:01:31+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
clay_c (2022-02-22 06:00:19+00:00): Hi Nick,

The segment of FM 931 south of Flat was removed from the state highway system in 2014 [1]. It was tagged with old_ref="FM 931" and a note describing this situation. So it shouldn't have a ref value of FM-931.

I tried looking at TIGER Roads to find out what its new identity is, but it unfortunately hadn't been updated. The only Mapillary imagery along SH 36 is blurry, so finding a street sign was unsuccessful. But I found out on Coryell County's GIS website that parcels along this street are addressed to "County Road 931". So I went ahead and made the change here [2]. 

[1] https://www.dot.state.tx.us/tpp/hwy/fm0500/fm0931.htm

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117710173
luiswoo (2021-12-30 09:01:31+00:00): ДИМА61, highway=constraction — это полная невозможность движения по дороге, а не "есть возможность повреждения транспортного средства при проезде по данной дороге".
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-11 18:46:25+00:00): Hi AirportExpert, thanks for adding footways in/around Cadigan Park. Just a note (which you might've already fixed since this was early in your OSM career), I noticed that a few of them don't quite connect with other ways, for example the footways that lead to parking lot service roads but you terminate at the edge of the parking lot rather than connecting them to the service roads. I've fixed them in this instance. Thanks.
user_5359 (2021-12-30 07:37:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Same problem which the change set comment (see my comment on your second change set). 

I know this is your first entry. But please have a look at the OSM Wiki before you start. For parking there is the page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Parking and for a single parking space the page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space. 

Your attempt to describe a parking space with a realisation is like shooting at a sparrow with a cannon. And even if the older, existing parking spaces all have a descriptive name: This is definitely wrong. The parking space numbers are noted under the key ref and not under the key name. 

If you need support: You are welcome.
luiswoo (2021-12-30 08:58:18+00:00): ДИМА61, вы понимаете, что после того, как дорога стала обозначаться как highway=constraction, то для прокладки маршрута она перестаёт существовать от слова совсем?
user_5359 (2021-12-30 07:21:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add a proper descrption of your modification. Why did you add this relation? 

What is the meaning of key parking_accesses? Is this a typo?

Why did you need the information region=us (this clear by the position)?

Did you see the way https://www.osm.org/way/558483948 ? I recommend adapting this path for better routing.