piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2019-12-01 22:27:56+00:00): Hi Absaroka.  this is how I read the statement in the wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction), but I'm not a native English speaker, so I might be misunderstanding.
One sentence states: »ensure that routing engines embody the regional rule« so that we don't need loads of turn restrictions all over the map.
but please check with others and if you think so invite them to cheap in here, or in the discussion tab of the wiki page.
GerdP (2022-07-18 13:58:19+00:00): Moin!
Der Zaun hier geht mitten durch ein Geäude? https://www.osm.org/way/403658106
Und geht er wirklich komplett um die Wiese rum? Sonst lieber einen zweiten Weg malen, der die Punkte wiederverwendet.
ika-chan! (2022-05-30 01:30:34+00:00): Hello, I believe you did a lot of street light mapping in Mont-de-Marsan over the years, and I wonder if you could review and revise the material values of the street light poles (material=*), because it appears that the current values (e.g. "Ag", "At", "Béton", etc.) are deprecated according to https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#username=&zoom=13&lat=43.8975&lon=-0.475&item=3040. Valid alternative values include: "steel", "concrete" and "iron".
user_5359 (2016-03-14 18:28:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I think you forgot to change the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174911147 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174911146
user_5359 (2016-03-14 18:32:11+00:00): please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpumping_station. It will be a good idea to add man_made=pumping_station and pumping_station=water.
user_5359 (2016-03-14 18:34:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! if this is a address, please use addr:street="Boat Launch Road" and add:housenumber=36
user_5359 (2016-03-14 18:21:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
user_5359 (2016-03-14 18:22:29+00:00): Again, Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
5m4u9 (2016-03-14 20:02:46+00:00): Gracias por contribuir y mejorar los datos del mapa.

Para en otra si puedes es importante cambiar Av. por Avenida o Psje. por Pasaje o añadir Calle dónde sea. 

Tenemos un grupo en Telegram de OpenStreetMap Bolivia para resolver dudas, problemas, anunciar eventos de mapeo, talleres, herramientas. Si gustas te paso el enlace para ir colaborando.
user_5359 (2016-03-14 19:46:47+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzung des OSM-Datenbestandes. Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkt, die nur einen Namen besitzen sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a . Den Eintrag shop=hearing_aids habe ich schon nachgetragen, aber was soll die Adresse mit dem H als Name bedeuten?
manings (2016-03-16 06:12:36+00:00): Hi Anusha, You have added motorways around this area.  I don't think they are motorways.  Please check this india road tagging wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway
manings (2016-03-16 06:12:59+00:00): Please fix them. Thank you
anushakavali (2016-03-17 08:51:43+00:00): Hi manings,
I have re-tagged the road or path names in task blocks  #61 , #68 and #73. Please look onto it and give me your feedback on the rework done.
Thank You.
maraf24 (2016-03-14 19:32:22+00:00): Zapisy niezgodne z polską ortografią. 
NIeistniejąca ulica.
Wycofane.
PlaneMad (2016-03-15 05:10:29+00:00): Welcome to Bengaluru :)
geodreieck4711 (2016-05-09 21:30:09+00:00): its definitly no trunk....
SomeoneElse (2016-08-03 22:43:42+00:00): Hello,
I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.  Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.

We're aware that there is disputed territory in the region.  Most notably the area covered by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara , and also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceuta and other areas to the north.

First, it's worth mentioning https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That explains that what matters most to OSM in terms of names, borders and boundaries is the "on the ground" rule.  For example, if a majority of the population of an area speaks language "a" then it makes sense for OSM's "name" tag to be in language "a" (though of course other name tags such as name:b, name:c etc. can also be used to make maps in other languages).  Similarly, if the people of an area consider themselves to be part of country "a" and country "a" does indeed have control over the area, it makes sense for the area to be part of country "a" (and only country "a") in OSM.

Potential problems in the area covered by the Morocco admin_level 2 relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 include:

1) That relation includes not only the part of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara currently administered by Morocco (the part west of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 ), it also includes the part of that territory east of it too.  Is this correct?  It seems at odds with OSM's "on the ground" rule, and with the UN peacekeepers' position described at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/minurso/background.shtml .

2) That relation also includes territories administered by Spain such as Ceuta and Melilla.  What evidence is there that Morocco controls these territories and that Spain does not?

Another major question, (largely dependant on the answer to (1) above) is:

3) If the area east of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 isn't part of Morocco, what status should it have?  http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=195838 did represent this territory and had several different admin levels before it was deleted.

The DWG would be grateful for your opinions on these matters.  You can either reply here or, if you prefer you can email data@osmfoundation.org directly and we'll read through all the replies.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
AkageMuk (2016-03-14 19:16:22+00:00): Hi! Tags were not missing, this is intended. Please do not put tag these ways, as they are parts of relations. Follow requirements given  in: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Usage

"Tags describing the multipolygon (e.g., landuse=forest) should go on the relation. The outer way(s) should be left untagged"
Also waterway=riverbank is not needed (gets deprecated), if  natural=water and water=river are given (which is more proper way of tagging).
RicoElectrico (2017-06-26 22:49:32+00:00): Cześć, jak to naprawdę wygląda? Bo teraz jest duplikacja - węzeł i obrys budynku mają shop=car_repair: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4060133916/history#map=19/51.41593/21.15952

Ta stacja kontroli pojazdów i warsztat to inne firmy?

Tak samo nie wiem za bardzo po co oznaczać jeszcze jako kolejny serwis biuro warsztatu.
Polarbear (2016-03-15 13:27:30+00:00): You might add leisure=sports_centre, and if the gym fills the building, tag the building outline.
malenki (2016-03-17 17:48:46+00:00): Hallo richard23,
bist du sicher, dass dieser Weg nicht "Knickweg" heißt?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135630138/history
richard23 (2016-03-17 19:38:03+00:00): Ja,da ist kein Straßenschild.  
Knickweg ist ja auch meistens, aber inoffiziell, ein Weg hinter einem Knick. Hier ist aber nicht mal ein Knick. Nackter Acker links und rechts.
Ist bestimmt so eine Benennung der Leute die da wohnen...
malenki (2016-03-17 19:52:05+00:00): Wenn du nur vermuten kannst, dass die Leute den Weg so nennen, solltest du den Name nicht löschen. Nicht viele Mapper schreiben Namen aus Unfug an Objekte.
Wenn das Kriterium "Schild" ausschlaggebend sein soll, müsste man vermutlich auch die Namen aller Hügel/Berge ringsum löschen…
loc_name wäre der passende Tag für lokale Namen.
richard23 (2016-03-18 07:46:23+00:00): Ich glaube es ist in Deutschland so üblich, dass Straßen und Wege mit Schildern von Amtswegen(!) benannt werden. Umgangssprachliche Nennungen haben im name tag gar nichts verloren. Vermutlich war es der Selbe, welcher hier um die Ecke auch ein Feld "Spargelfeld" benannt hatte. Du wirst den Namen, nicht ohne Grund, auch weder bei Google, Bing oder sonst wo finden. Wenn jetzt jeder anfängt seine Nicknames für irgendwas zu vertaggen können wir das name tag auf den Mond schießen...
Gruß, Dirk
richard23 (2016-03-18 07:54:40+00:00): Ich ruder mal ein Stück zurück: 
Auf der LGLN Karte ist in hoher Zoomstufe dort tatsächlich "Knickweg" angegeben.
Gehe mal davon aus, dass die nur amtliche Bezeichnungen drinhaben.
malenki (2016-03-18 12:40:42+00:00): Das mit loc_name hast du vermutlich überlesen?
Den Wert gibt es knapp 50.000mal:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/loc_name
Die Frage ist auch, was es wohl eher gab: Namen, die von den Menschen am jeweiligen Ort vergeben wurden oder deren urkundliche Erwähnung?
Kannst am Wochenende mal drüber rätseln :)
user_5359 (2016-03-14 19:49:25+00:00): Please add the layer information, please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer .
formfeed (2016-03-14 20:24:54+00:00): user_5359: 
Looks like the underpass already has -1. 
(thanks if you added that)
kartler175 (2016-03-15 15:18:16+00:00): Warum denn die ganzen doppelten Wege?
Der JOSM-Validator meldet doch die Fehler.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=10.95916&lat=50.89520&zoom=14&opacity=1.00&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways
Smiljan_02 (2016-03-15 18:21:29+00:00): Ich weis auch nicht warum, JOSM hat da nichts angemeckert. Das sind aber auch ways und notes die gerade ab den Landkreisgerenzen liegen. Die Daten der Straßen und Autobahnen hole ich mir mit einer overpass-Abfrage .
Ich mach mich mal gleich ans reparieren.
Geography Canada (2016-04-04 22:21:11+00:00): Why was SADR deleted?
Geography Canada (2016-04-04 22:28:24+00:00): Are you for Morocco in the Western Sahara conflict? You live in Morocco, right?
maraf24 (2016-04-02 13:47:31+00:00): Naprawiłem to co tu zapsułeś/zapsułaś.
R0bst3r (2016-03-16 07:42:06+00:00): Hallo aufachse,
du hast für 2 nicht mehr vorhandene Feldwege das Prefix razed: verwendet. Dies wird idR nur für railway verwendet. 

Für alles andere gibt es die osm Lifecycle prefixes, siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Ich hab mir erlaubt das auf removed: zu ändern :)

Gefunden habe ich die Tags durch http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
aufachse (2016-03-16 20:49:47+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,

Danke für den Hinweis. Nettes Tool.
naoliv (2016-03-14 20:23:27+00:00): Leandro, o que você quis fazer aqui? Por que apagou 2 ruas?
dieterdreist (2017-11-20 11:51:25+00:00): Ciao,
in realtà quel edificio che tu hai fatto diventare un'area pedonale lunga, esisteva e ancora esiste, si tratta di un passaggio interno dalla piazza al percorso dietro. Ci sarebbe anche da sistemare la viabilità (ci sono delle porte che portano alla parte amministrativa dalla piazza, appunto attraverso questo edicio che hai fatto sparire qui).
Nesim (2016-03-14 20:28:02+00:00): Size zahmet sağlık ocaklarını klinik etiketiyle ekleyebilirmisiniz.
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
bielebog (2016-03-24 11:55:42+00:00): Die K96 hat nicht den Typ tertiary, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attributierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland: 
"Bei der Unterscheidung zwischen den Attributen highway=primary, highway=secondary und highway=tertiary insbesondere sind die Verwaltungsklassen Bundesstraße, Landes-/Staatsstraße und Kreisstraße nur eine Richtschnur! Hier geht es um die jeweilige Verkehrsbedeutung"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37125199
Eine reine Eintragung als tertiary wegen der Klassifizierung als Kreisstraße wäre falsch. Die Straße ist per Schranken abgesperrt und nur für Militärfahrzeuge nutzbar.

Deswegen ist die Note
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/507425

meiner Meinung nach auch sehr berechtigt.

Wir sollten uns dabei auf eine gemeinsame Linie einigen, damit das nicht immer hin- und hergeht.
Galbinus (2016-03-24 14:31:21+00:00): War keine böse Absicht. Ich hatte die Diskussion zuvor nicht wahrgenommen. Außerdem war der Weg nicht in allen Wegstücken gleich klassifiziert. Die Argumentation ist aber einleuchtend. Aber was wäre dann die beste Einordnung? Nebenstraße? Feldweg oder Erschließungsweg würden meiner Meinung nach dem immer noch vorhandenen Status einer Kreisstraße nicht gerecht. Und was ist mit der L942? Auch sie ist von ihrer Bedeutung her keine Landesstraße mehr sondern als nur tageweise geöffnete Straße dann wohl auch eher eine Nebenstraße?
bielebog (2016-03-31 11:41:09+00:00): highway=unclassified finde ich erstmal ganz passend
ligfietser (2017-03-12 18:45:37+00:00): Beste Goran,
Gebruik aub géen name tag voor de boomsoort, maar gebruik species:nl
Zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
marczoutendijk (2017-03-13 11:01:25+00:00): Contact gehad met Goran. Hij wilde een bomenplan afdrukken met de namen van de bomen erop. Ik heb een overpass voorbeeld voor hem gemaakt:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nsj
Daarmee kan hij aan de gang gaan. Ik blijft het wel even volgen.
marczoutendijk (2017-03-13 11:18:33+00:00): Ik heb de linkerhoek als vb. aangepast.
Het bijhorende script:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nsn
marczoutendijk (2017-03-16 10:54:27+00:00): Wegens uitblijven van reactie van Goran, heb ik nu alle bomen van de juiste tagging voorzien.
marczoutendijk (2017-03-16 11:03:35+00:00): En dat gebeurde in deze changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46894298
Peda (2016-04-24 10:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
eggie (2017-07-26 13:55:15+00:00): Alsnog welkom bij OSM. PB met welkom verstuurd.
Peda (2016-04-24 10:50:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
Hjart (2016-03-14 21:25:29+00:00): Hvad forsøger du at lave her?
Basstoelpel (2019-01-14 20:58:19+00:00): Hi Telse, 

what is the power station you added here? Is it a hydroelectric plant or a substation?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dplant
Telse (2019-01-14 22:33:25+00:00): Hi Basstoelpel, it's an hydroelectric plant
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
HubMiner (2017-09-01 15:52:44+00:00): Please review this note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/905362
about your change.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
oslim (2017-12-01 13:35:05+00:00): Hi BikeRoad,

why have you tagged the whole reserva as natural=wood? This park is not a forest.

Usually it's never correct to tag any nature reserve with a single landuse.

Cheers,
oslim
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-03-15 15:46:51+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Glassman (2016-03-19 02:40:36+00:00): Is Mecha a name of a business or the building. We do not add personal information to objects. If you need help, just respond to this changeset discussion.
velotron (2016-03-19 02:45:24+00:00): Mecha is the personal name of my house. It was my first OSM commit, and I will revert it. Thanks.
muralito (2016-03-15 04:22:12+00:00): Hello.

What source are you using for changing highways classification?

Are you sure your new alignment is better than before? Bing usually changes the offset, and not always is better than before.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
martinum4 (2016-04-07 08:11:19+00:00): Hallo, war es nicht mal angedacht bei Straßennamen explizit keine Abkürzungen zu verwenden?
user_53559 (2016-04-07 16:02:53+00:00): Die Straßennamen sollten so verwendet werden, wie sie von der Stadt beschlossen wurden. Die St.-Georg-Straße taucht in dieser Schreibweise im offiziellen Stadtplan auf.
Nakaner (2016-04-09 09:11:10+00:00): Der offizielle Stadtplan ist keine zulässige Quelle und daher irrelevant.

Es gibt übrigens auch short_name=*.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:43:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
5m4u9 (2016-03-15 10:27:53+00:00): Sólo algunos consejos...

* el área residencial que está dibujado en mi criterio debería desaparecer y obtener el de la "mancha urbana actual del municipio" ahí se define hasta donde es rural y hasta donde urbano.

* las estaciones de servicio el nombre debes omitir "Estación de Servicio" y directo el nombre

* los colegios, escuelas son amenity=school y SI TODO el lugar es construcción buildling=school  sino empezar a dibujar cada bloque y asignar ahí building=school. Servirá para añadir cada aula.

* Vende GNV, diesel, gasolina, glp? aquí hay una tabla para cada valor (fuel:cng=yes, fuel:lpg=yes y así) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
literan (2016-03-15 13:10:15+00:00): Правка откачена, т.к. ей вы безо всякого обоснования удалили труд других людей: более правильно landuse=residential ставить отдельно на каждый квартал. Ухудшать качество данных запрещено, это вандализм.
mueschel (2016-03-17 10:35:56+00:00): Hi Hendrik,
I found these nodes: 
    amenity=waste_basket
    basket_colour=grey
    basket_material=steel

Keys with *_colour are quite rare (basket_colour is not used anywhere else). It is much more common to use a colon as separator, e.g. basket:colour. 
But in this special case you don't need to make use of subkeys, colour= and material= is perfectly fine as the only object it can refer to is the waste_basket - as opposed to buildings with roof:colour and building:colour at the same time.
Cheers, Jan
dvdhoven (2016-03-15 06:52:26+00:00): Bij knooppunt 8 was het fietspad door verbonden. Daardoor gaf het fietsknooppuntennetwerk een fout en routeeerde niet meer.
Dringende aanbeveling wegen en fietspaden niet door te verbinden.
Zo te zien gebruik je Potlach. Die tool verhinderd niet dat je over relaties heen door verbindt. JOSM doet dat wel.
R0bst3r (2016-03-16 08:41:02+00:00): Hi Hendrikklaas,
welcome to the latest keys list :)

You've added new keys for basket_material etc. Just for improvement - wouldn't be a prefix "basket:" like building:material, fence:material, ... a better choice?
Rps333 (2016-03-26 16:59:34+00:00): Thanks for adding the roads. But I think you have miss tags these roads. Check out the wiki. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canadian_tagging_guidelines

Cheers
user_5359 (2016-03-15 15:27:05+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a Or please read directly http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:toll
marcioaguiar (2016-03-15 11:16:06+00:00): Bom dia, Ayron!

A tag correta para assentamento seria landuse=allotments.

Também evite utilizar nomes todos em caixa alta como "ASSENTAMENTO NOVA FAMILIA".

Obrigado pela contribuição
Chetan_Gowda (2016-03-15 05:43:02+00:00): Hi @osm0123456789, 
 Seems like you have imported lot of data. According to the OSM import guidelines, the imports must be added to the wiki and should mention correct "source" to it. 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
ramyaragupathy (2016-03-15 05:28:10+00:00): Hi @Srikanth07, Can you please remove duplicate buildings in this changeset? There are lots of duplicates in this area. Please check the screenshot in this link https://www.dropbox.com/s/iyk4r1v07s3o24n/Screenshot%202016-03-15%2010.53.08.png?dl=0
Frans S (2019-03-22 08:30:07+00:00): Hi Elia,  Thanks fro mapping on this project.  A remark. Please map round huts as round buildings, When you use the building tool it is the key combination Alt-Z, back to square Alt-R
I adjust the buildings which I find during validation
Thanks
Frans S (2019-03-22 08:34:32+00:00): Hi Elia,  Sorry for my previous message. I did not realize that this was mapped 3 years ago.
Best regards
budgawl (2017-06-01 12:07:02+00:00): поправил за газовиками строчицы (почистил теги name)
poornibadrinath (2016-04-15 06:08:41+00:00): Hey, @Haseeburahman
You should not be using Google/yahoo as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Also there is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
Владимир К (2016-03-21 08:13:28+00:00): номер дома без улицы мало полезен. Плюс здесь рядом стоит дом с таким же номером, что очень подозрительно. Ну и source=Жизнь по буржуйски будет source=survey. Таки проект международный
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:44:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Alecs01 (2016-03-15 20:08:58+00:00): Benvenuto/a su Openstreetmap! ho visto che hai aggiunto questo nodo senza tag: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4061248958 posso suggerirne uno? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food Ciao buon mapping!
GOwin (2016-03-15 09:38:31+00:00): Sipag ah. :)
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-03-15 10:59:02+00:00): Det er bedst så vidt muligt kun at have info et sted, så jeg har tilladt mig at slette noden i midten og flytte al info over på bygningen.