piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
janolezab (2022-07-08 15:32:02+00:00): Hey Safetying,it may not be the most precise tag, but is definitely present in OSM. There is even documentation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Abuilding%3Dgovernment
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-06 03:45:37+00:00): Reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway

"mapping of non-existent railways as incorrect"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-06 03:45:45+00:00): Reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway

"mapping of non-existent railways as incorrect"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-06 03:46:05+00:00): Reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway

"mapping of non-existent railways as incorrect"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-06 03:45:59+00:00): Reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway

"mapping of non-existent railways as incorrect"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
felipeeugenio (2022-07-06 15:23:05+00:00): Hola José- Gracias por tu tiempo
Sin embargo el realinear es una tarea muy grande y lo que estás haciendo es mirar una de decenas de fotos satelitales, las cuales nadie sabe muy bien cuál es la correcta.

si acaso hay problemas de geometría puede ser que sea conveniente corregir, pero si solo es desplazamiento no vas a terminar nunca.

y vas a haber avanzado mucho cuando llegue alguien que, mirando otra foto satelital, te corrija todo.

saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:15:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-06 03:45:28+00:00): Reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway

"mapping of non-existent railways as incorrect"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
eggie (2022-07-06 04:58:16+00:00): Hi Mctruc..  
This is not a tourism=apartment.
I will remove your contribution.
Greetz,
eggie
MxxCon (2022-07-06 05:14:43+00:00): Hello.
On some of the ways you added "name_1=" tag instead of "alt_name=". Could you please elaborate why did you do that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123257331
archpdx (2022-07-06 06:20:06+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Quick tip - you can square the corners of buildings by pressing "q" after selecting them.
ndm (2022-07-06 11:46:12+00:00): Could you please provide more information about this change set - what was the intention? Why are you adding residential ways to an airport?
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-03 09:45:50+00:00): سلام
نام این میدان طبق تابلو شهرداری "میدان سرداران شهید سلام‌الله و فیروز بخشایش" هست و نام قدیم در ذیل آن درج نشده. در تگ name هم ما موظفیم نام اصلی و کامل و در short name نام کوتاه شده (فامیلی همراه با پیشوند شهید) و در loc name نام مورد استفاده محلی که در تابلو نیست و در old name نام قدیم درج شده در تابلو شهرداری و در alt name نامی که در هیچ طبقه بندی نمی‌گنجد را ثبت نماییم.
باسپاس
Warin61 (2022-07-07 00:59:09+00:00): Hi,
You might find the DCS Imagery to have more resolution and better location accuracy than bing.
archpdx (2022-07-07 17:17:53+00:00): Hi,
I noticed you added `canoe=canoe` and `motorboat=motorboat` to Haight Reservoir. Please note that these are used to specify whether or not canoes or motorboats, respectively, are able to access bodies of water (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:canoe and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorboat), so I would change the value to no/yes or one of the values listed on those wiki articles.
Raúl67 (2022-07-08 01:12:14+00:00): Okay. Done. Thanks. I will try to keep my thrashing to a minimum while I scale the vertical wall of the JOSM learning curve.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-08 02:28:51+00:00): name:ar means name In Arabic, you can't add another language in this tag.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-08 02:30:34+00:00): The wiki tags you added is not affiliated with the subjects you edited.
literan (2022-07-06 17:40:01+00:00): не надо на рандомные точки ставить название улицы
mavl (2022-07-07 13:54:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Здание, которое добавляет это пакет правок, оказалось непрямоугольным. В редакторе iD есть специальная команда ("Сделать углы прямыми") для создания прямых углов.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-06 19:20:59+00:00): Hello ESKH, your changeset comment say “adding places” but you are changing ‘name’ tag, why is that?   
Why do you change the name tag?
DD1GJ (2022-07-06 08:07:36+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für die Ortskenntnisse. Ich habe die Löschung rückgängig gemacht und Weg sowie Aussichtpunkt mit dem Lebenszyklus-Präfix versehen. So bleibt alles transparent und nachprüfbar in der Datenbank werhalten, wird aber auf den Karten nicht mehr angezeigt. Diese bundesweit bewährte Vorgehensweise wird seitens der Community von allen Naturschutzorganisationen erwartet.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228520662/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2371888586/history

Klären Sie weitere Einzelheiten bitte mit der DAV-Bundesgeschäftsstelle - Ressort Naturschutz und Kartografie ab.
DAV Berchtesgaden (2022-07-06 09:22:16+00:00): Vielen herzlichen Dank
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-07-28 23:44:52+00:00): Why were track segments removed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123259155
tpotter (2022-07-30 16:02:10+00:00): The track is being overgrown with brush and is gradually disappearing. As these tracks start to disappear or become impassable, I either change them to highway=path or change them to be intermittent to represent that they are no longer a clear track.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123259155
Frans S (2022-07-13 13:04:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
your mappings are a bit sloppy.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123259639
bkil (2022-07-06 13:51:29+00:00): Köszönjük a bejelentést. Szeretnék érdeklődni, hogy mit szimbolizál a pontként lerakott játszótér a játszótéren belül? Amennyiben egy konkrét játékot, annak jelölése a következő: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
NKA (2022-07-06 15:03:07+00:00): Fint om du kan unngå å legge inn objekter som ikke eksisterer, dvs ikke legge inn tags med verdien «no» eller «none».
7rst1 (2022-07-06 17:12:39+00:00): Hei. Dette er via StreetComplete. Dette er meningen, da jeg som appen mener at om taggen ikke eksisterer betyr det ingen data, og nei betyr et definitivt nei.
NKA (2022-07-06 17:51:19+00:00): Helt meningsløst. Det er sikkert 100 ting man kan tagge med at ikke eksisterer der.
7rst1 (2022-07-06 21:07:05+00:00): Definitiv data kan være nyttig for framkommelighet for handicap osv. Har ingen flere gode grunner, men helt meningsløst ville jeg ikke kalt det. Det går an å lage en issue på StreetComplete sin GitHub hvis du er uenig i tagginga. Folk vil nok bare fortsette å svare ærlig på spørsmål i appen uavhengig om det virker nyttig i det store bildet, så appfunksjonaliteten er vel rota i problemet.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
pyram (2022-07-12 20:18:09+00:00): Hi kir558855,

Willkommen bei OSM.

Zu Deiner Änderung https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/898175335/history hätte ich eine kleine Rückfrage:
Nach Luftbild und Topologie sollte es an dieser Rampe zur Bahnbrücke logischerweise keinen Tunnel geben. Was wolltest Du hier in Wirklichkeit ändern?
Leider verstehe ich den Kommentar "für LP" dazu auch nicht.

Gruß
pyram
Raúl67 (2022-07-06 16:19:17+00:00): I would be very interested in how the tagging was cleaned up so it can be done correctly next time.
archpdx (2022-07-06 19:55:24+00:00): Here are the things I changed:
* changed `fence_type=white picket fence` to `fence_type=wood` + `colour=white` (see https://wiki.osm.org/Key:fence_type and https://wiki.osm.org/Key:colour)
* changed fence height from `3 ft` to `1` (changed to meters but this can also be represented in feet, see https://wiki.osm.org/Key:height#examples). I'm not sure if the height of the utility pole you mapped was in meters or in feet so I didn't touch it. Note that height values are in meters by default (no units given).
* changed `structure=carport` to `building=carport` (see https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:building=carport)
* changed `sidewalk=separate` to `highway=footway` + `footway=sidewalk` (the `sidewalk` key is meant to only go on roads that have a sidewalk rather than the sidewalk itself, see https://wiki.osm.org/Key:sidewalk and https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:footway=sidewalk)
* change `step_count=6` polygon to a way connecting the sidewalk to the house and added `highway=steps` (see https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:highway=steps)
archpdx (2022-07-06 19:56:00+00:00): * connected `entrance=main` node to the house/steps
Warin61 (2022-07-11 06:21:40+00:00): Hi
The Lions Club does not usually operate a 'Mens Shed".

For how to tag a 'mens shed' please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Community_Groups
For how to tag the Lions Club see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_centre
downhill (2022-07-06 06:57:33+00:00): der blaugestrichelte Radweg, beginnend an der Oberschorrmühle und einmündend in die Limmersdorfer Straße ist asphaltiert und für alle Räder befahrbar. Bei Komoot wird dieser Wegabschnitt als evtl. nicht befahrbar markiert
ivanbranco (2022-07-07 16:13:21+00:00): Hi bob3bob3,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9869689324/history

what type of place is this one?
bob3bob3 (2022-07-07 20:34:44+00:00): It's a farm...
ivanbranco (2022-07-08 18:35:05+00:00): Ok thanks, I changed it from place=name to place=farm. Good mapping!
jeslop (2022-07-06 07:36:39+00:00): Hello Bertie65 and welcome to Open Street Map. Is not allowed to enter personal information on OSM, you must delete it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

Regards

Jesús López | OpenStreetMap Foundation | Data Working Group


Machine Vertaling
Hallo Bertie65. Welkom bij Open Street Map. Het is niet toegestaan om persoonlijke informatie op OSM in te voeren, je moet het verwijderen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

Groeten
PierZen (2022-07-22 19:40:31+00:00): Thanks Alessia to contributute to map the Niger delta. To reflects its particularities, we did apply a pattern since 2012-2013 to reflect flooding areas, including islands (flood_prone=yes).   But for the river areas (natural=water; water=river) , we do not add seasonal=yes since there is always water in the river.  You should remove the  seasonal=yes tag and instruct participants to not add such tag to it. In other areas, some contributors have added  intermittent=no, but this is useless.
UNGSC_Alessia13 (2022-08-01 09:26:16+00:00): Thank you Pier for your suggestion. I agree with you and have removed the seasonal tag from the water=river polygons.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-27 14:24:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4036062203/history

so it is not a stile anymore and stile tag can be removed, right?
aTarom (2022-07-06 12:59:06+00:00): Hola kpax164, se restaura la versión 14 del nodo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1440348007/history
name:valenciano no es un tag aprobado por la comunidad
y los wikipedia y wikidata parecen válidos, no? se restauran también.
En futuras ediciones sería de gran ayuda el comentar los changesets.
Cualquier problema me dices.
Saludos.
BCNorwich (2022-07-07 07:52:39+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've made a lot of duplicated highways here. Please be aware that when/if a feature needs correcting the existing feature should be corrected. You ought not draw a new feature over an old one. Also you should not normally delete and redraw features. Editing existing features keeps all history intact within the OSM database.

I think I've removed all of the duplicated highways so no problems now exist.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-07-07 07:56:12+00:00): Hi, Woods, parks, and marshlands should be drawn as areas rather than POIs

Regards Bernard.
osmviborg (2022-07-06 08:21:13+00:00): Hej. Prøv skærmkortet når du tegner bygninger. Skærmkortet viser de fleste gange det rigtige fodaftryk.
JensTyller (2022-07-06 08:41:38+00:00): Er de bygninger, på skærmkortet, ikke fra BBR?
JensTyller (2022-07-06 09:49:39+00:00): Og mener du det er mere præcist?
osmviborg (2022-07-06 10:02:30+00:00): Om det kommer fra BBR ved jeg ikke. Det er et baggrundskort som bliver brugt i mange steder. Det viser bl.a. hvordan bygninger ser ud nede ved soklen. Det er ikke mange ortofoto der er taget direkte ovenfra. Derfor en masse skævheder ved specielt høje bygninger.
JensTyller (2022-07-06 10:33:47+00:00): Jeg tror det er SDFEs bygningspolygoner (fra BBR) som danner grundlag for skærmkort. 
Hvis vi følger skærmkortet, kunne vi istedet opdaterer automatisk med BBR placeringer.

I forhold til skævheden i ortofoto.
Mener jeg at tage højde for det ved at placere punkter ved synlige fundament strækninger og parallelforskyde usynlige strækninger.

PS. Hvis jeg lyder kontrær er dette ikke min mening. Jeg tror vi har fat i noget vigtigt her og vil gerne have sparring:)
Rom1 (2022-07-07 06:43:06+00:00): Bonjour, ce numéro 15 et sa position sont très douteux. Vous auriez une source ? Merci.
GrandNancyLabNumNT (2022-07-07 07:21:56+00:00): Tout d'abord merci votre retour. Nous avons des soucis de géolocalisation pour cette adresse lors de la remontée de désordres public par les agents du Grand Nancy. Le "15, Rue du Moulin" nous envoie à Bouxières-aux-Dames. Nous avons donc positionné ce point par recoupement.
Rom1 (2022-07-07 07:06:57+00:00): Ici, le numéro 43 est porté par un garage. J'ai posé la question ici https://twitter.com/jdesboeufs/status/1544940642333347845 Du coup, adresse inutile ? Merci.
GrandNancyLabNumNT (2022-07-07 07:24:46+00:00): Nous avons des soucis de géolocalisation pour cette adresse lors de la remontée de désordres public par les agents du Grand Nancy. Le "43, Rue Émile Gallé" nous envoie à Dieulouard. Nous avons donc positionné ce point pour une géolocalisation cohérente.
user_4412096 (2022-07-06 08:14:59+00:00): source should be "local knowledge"
berndw (2022-07-09 10:11:01+00:00): Hallo Bratwurstzange

Vielen dank für Deine Beiträge zu OpenStreetMap.

Ich habe mir erlaubt die Baumsperre von barrier=tree_trunk nach barrier=log zu ändern, das entspricht dem Vorgaben aus dem Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dlog

Trotzdem viel Spaß beim Mappen und falls Du fragen hast einfach in die Changesetdiskussion schreiben.

Bernd
Bratwurstzange (2022-07-09 11:00:27+00:00): Bernd, dank dir. 
Das war mein erster Beitrag, gut zu wissen, dass es ein Review gibt. 
Grüße
Stefan
HighRouleur (2022-08-31 12:07:39+00:00): Rode through Albert park today and could not see the path you have added through the grass area.
tolioalessandro (2022-07-06 15:05:18+00:00): Il livello di una strada non è a discrezione dell'utente, che può modificare a suo piacimento. Una strada primaria deve iniziare da una strada primaria o superiore e finire su un'altra strada primaria o superiore. Altrimenti non è una primaria. Stessa cosa vale per una secondaria, deve iniziare e finire su strade equivalenti o superiori. Non può abbandonare gli utenti su una terziaria. Ogni livello di strade deve costituire una rete, con quelle di pari livello o superiore. Non può reggersi su strade di livello inferiore. 

In questo caso il tronco sud della Variante di Spresiano collega una superstrada ad una strada primaria, pertanto gli si può assegnare livello primario. Il tronco nord invece finisce su una strada terziaria e non può pertanto eccedere questo livello. L'assegnazione del livello della strada era pertanto corretta prima del suo intervento: tronco sud primario, tronco nord terziario. 

I 2 tronchi possono avere entrambi le stesse caratteristiche geometriche (stesse fattezze), ma la loro classificazione funzionale è diversa.

Spero che questo commento possa chiarire i sui dubbi. Se così non fosse non esiti a scrivermi. Buona giornata!
eggie (2022-07-06 12:34:45+00:00): Dag Jochum.. Je vraagt feedback..
Wanneer er een bord fietspad staat G11, G13 of G12a  dan is het een fietspad in OSM..  Zoniet dan highway=path gebruiken.

MVG
eggie
ToniE (2022-07-06 10:33:52+00:00): Hallo lostcontinent,

willkommen bei OSM. Ein paar Tipps:

foot=yes und motor_vehicle=yes (und bicycle=yes) sind die allgemein gültigen Tags/Standardwerte an highway=residential - sie müssen nicht extra erfasst werden.

description ist in diesem Fall eigentlich unnötig und konkret sogar auf einem kurzen Stück der Leinthalerstraße falsch: das kurze Stück von NW kommend bis zum Abzweig nach NO zur Hausnummer 51 (Bahn-Landwirtschaft ...).

description="... Leinthalerstrasse" sollte mit 'ß' geschrieben werden.

Viele Grüße
Toni
ToniE (2022-07-06 10:36:57+00:00): ... ah ja: tunnel=yes und layer=-1 zusammen mit dem bereits vorher existierenden bridge=yes und layer=1 an der Bahnstrecke vertragen sich nicht - ist nicht erlaubt. 

Aus den Luftbildern ergibt sich, dass es eine Brücke ist, kein Tunnel.

VG
Toni
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-09 17:22:09+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124110800
ToniE (2022-07-06 10:21:09+00:00): Hallo henne077,

das sind ja nur noch 21 Tage.

So kurze Baustellen werden nicht auf diese Weise gemapped. Jemand, der/die die Karten seines/ihres Navis nur alle paar Monate aktualisiert und das genau in den nächsten 3 Woche macht, wird diese Strecke für längere Zeit nicht benutzen können. Es gibt auch Navis, die Updates nur einmal im Monat anbieten, hier entsteht ein Ähnliches Problem.

access:conditional=no @ (2022 Jul 01-2022 Jul 27)

wäre besser gewesen - Navis verstehen das (mittlerweile).

Zudem: zu highway=construction gehört immer auch ein cronstruction= ... 'primary' in diesem Fall, um festzuhalten, welche Art von Straße es vorher war und hinterher wieder sein wird. Andere Mapper müssten dann u.U. raten oder in der Historie suchen.

Ich werde die Änderungen entsprechend machen.

Viele Grüße
Toni
adiatmad (2022-07-12 02:47:04+00:00): Halo, salam kenal.
Apakah poligon ini merupakan area pertanian? (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1076285762). 
Terima kasih
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123267270
Frans S (2022-08-23 08:08:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123267868
Frans S (2022-08-23 08:08:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123267868
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-09 17:21:46+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144873937
Rom1 (2022-07-07 08:19:28+00:00): Salut, c'est quoi "ANRT" pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9869937325 ? Merci
nihombashi19 (2022-07-07 08:36:42+00:00): Atelier national de recherche typographique
Mais c'est plus probablement l'organisme d'accueil (ÉNSAD) qui a installé ledit défibrillateur
Firefishy (2022-07-06 11:49:51+00:00): Thank you. Any other edits are appreciated. Help improve the map of areas you know.