piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freebeer (2019-06-19 20:35:52+00:00): your change here has added a natural=water tag to the outer way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25460578 previously only partly tagged as a riverbank.

this has resulted in the entire area bounded by this way to rendered as water, instead of the inner islands defined by the multipolygon relation being excluded.

this had been a fairly common error, outers tagging duplicating the inner, but i made several passes to clear most from the us, and this appeared today in an area i had cleared.

the wiki page on riverbank tagging warns not to retag as river without knowing what you are doing for several reasons i do not understand.  i suspect this is not one of them, but a case of the iD editor incorrectly interpreting the tagging that is syntax-broken but working, and turning it into a syntax-correct but logically-broken tag.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/25460578 shows the tortured history it has had, but i shall be deleting the automatically-added tags and removing any other redundant ones to rescue the islands from the flooding.

does the iD validator warn in cases like this after your change before uploading, that the outer member tagging duplicates that of the relation?
mapman44 (2019-06-19 22:15:00+00:00): I'm really sorry. I am no longer using iD validation. There are just too many problems with it. Feel free to revert.
amckenna (2019-07-03 16:52:09+00:00): Adding campsites in Dolly Sods Wilderness
mavl (2019-07-21 16:13:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
trial (2020-03-30 20:07:54+00:00): L'idée est bonne. Par contre iD propose de pourrir au moins tous les Super U, remplaçant les wikipedia fr en en !
Je te laisse mettre un PR sur leur p* d'éditeur
goldfndr (2019-06-20 10:10:22+00:00): It seemed like an awkward name, but it's what was lettered on the window.
Colin Smale (2019-06-18 06:52:31+00:00): Is this area really an administrative exclave of Aberdeenshire council embedded in Aberdeen City? Such situations are not unknown, but are extremely unusual. If it is an exclave, could please add a note to explain?
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-06-18 08:51:53+00:00): Woodhill House is the administrative building for aberdeenshire. this is the area counted.
Colin Smale (2019-06-18 11:55:47+00:00): You learn something every day! There is one other example of an extraterritorial council HQ that i know of - Surrey CC has its base in Kingston, which is in Greater London.
I wonder who empties their bins, and whether they pay council taxex to Aberdeen City?
Colin Smale (2019-06-18 12:16:25+00:00): I can't find any evidence of the land actually forming part of Aberdeenshire, and I suspect it is simply part of Aberdeen City which is in use by Aberdeenshire Council, similar to the situation with an Embassy which is still part of the host country's sovereign territory. I am seriously wondering if this boundary should be tagged in this way. Can you offer any evidence that is should? Your boundary also includes the substation - is that really part of the area under discussion here?
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-06-18 12:21:02+00:00): It's possible that it is like that actually. I thought that the council's buildings had to be in their council but seemingly not necessarily. Also the substation really shouldn't be part.
Colin Smale (2019-06-18 12:24:30+00:00): Will you remove it as an admin boundary then? Instead, maybe a site relation would allow you to group the things together and flag it as an "extraterritorial office".
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-18 10:42:07+00:00): #test #failed

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your edits?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
mbethke (2019-06-19 02:07:08+00:00): Hi,
yes, there isn't any bridge, that's why it's mapped as a ford. Nothing wrong about that. Please don't any POIs such as attractions that are just there so some note appears on the map. You can add a read map bug if something is wrong, so somebody will have a look and fix it later.
cheers,
Matthias
mavl (2019-07-21 16:13:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
gscholz (2019-06-20 07:06:28+00:00): Hi Ajaie,
this changeset has added a significant amount of errors regarding duplicate nodes to the osm database:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.74127&lat=-8.55345&zoom=12

Can you please fix this?
Guido
PlinyTheYoungest (2019-06-21 02:55:23+00:00): Hi Guido

Thanks for getting in touch about this! At Kaart, we value the importance of producing the highest quality data possible. I deleted everything wrong.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:13:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:13:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:13:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:13:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:14:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-18 10:44:58+00:00): And again, may I know the reason behind deleting several hundred buildings? Thanks

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71350734

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
SomeoneElse (2019-12-15 11:24:58+00:00): Hello,
Is the "ford" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127567056/history a mistake?  I think that the fixme can be removed (because you've mapped the rest of the track) as well.
Best Regards,
Andy
tmmanish (2019-12-17 07:18:26+00:00): Hi Andy,

Thanks for looking into my edit.The ford tag already exists for which i have added the access tag of MV=yes for the track road. Reverted the edits as per the community request. Didn't edit the ford part has there are no proper evidence. Please let me know if any further changes are to be made.Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
tmmanish
SomeoneElse (2019-12-18 01:39:17+00:00): Thanks.  I've removed the fixme (because the reset of the track is now mapped) and removed the ford tag (which it looks like it got added by mistake).  I've also changed the service road to a track since that's what it looked most like when I was last there - but that was 8 years ago, so things may have changed!
mavl (2019-07-21 16:14:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:14:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
chnav (2019-06-18 15:33:00+00:00): Отель уже обозначен на здании, не создавайте дубликаты-ьрипликаты. Подозрение на неумелое пользование программой. Откачено.
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-18 10:44:13+00:00): Hi Dhana Bhatta, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Furthermore, could you 'square' your mapped buildings? You can find a help page about how to do this here: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71350934

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
viloan (2019-06-18 04:31:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-07-21 16:14:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:14:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
chnav (2019-07-17 07:39:49+00:00): Здравствуйте, дворовые проезды это highway=service
user_5359 (2019-06-18 18:16:05+00:00): Hello! You add to the border of some waters the tag highway=residential. A way around a water body is likely, but a road through a residential area is in the forest especially since it is then supposed to be identical to the water body boundary, quite unlikely.
user_5359 (2019-06-18 18:18:40+00:00): You add also to some buildings the highway tag. 
I suggest that we take the changes back completely and you try to apply the changes again without the highway statement.
CEFgoose (2019-06-20 00:46:09+00:00): You are completely correct. I apologize whole heartedly. I am not certain how it happened, I did not touch geometry on most of the mis-tagged items, so I must have mass selected everything at some point. If it threw an error it went right by me. In any case it does seem to be in my changeset so I take full responsibility. I have never reverted a changeset before, and I am reading on it and downloading a plugin now, however, if you have the ability, I fully understand and agree if you care to revert it yourself in the mean time. I would like to go forward improving the geometry in the Mesa area, however I will be far more careful in the future. Thank you for finding and pointing out my error and for doing so in a very professional manor, I appreciate that!
user_5359 (2019-06-20 06:46:19+00:00): Revert: Done! You are welcome!
viloan (2019-06-18 05:03:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-07-21 16:15:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:15:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:15:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:16:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
wadedorrell (2019-12-30 21:42:47+00:00): There's a warning about an unattached highway feature (a crossing with speed table) east of Glenwood off State St here. Node 6030851939. I don't think there's a speed table there, even the driveways are pretty flat. This changeset was pretty big and I can't quite figure what you intended to do with that node... clarify/fix or delete?
Allison P (2019-12-31 01:17:54+00:00): I did not create the feature, but blind validation (when iD did the fixes for you instead of requiring user review) caused me to update the tags without realising. I've removed it. Good eye. I also try to specify when I'm using the iD validator nowadays. Let me know if you have further questions.
korolenok (2019-06-21 08:41:19+00:00): Areas were retagged to landuse=residential. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=garden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71353869
simulator1 (2019-06-21 09:15:02+00:00): isn't there redundancy now? Because retagged areas are now inside bigger landuse=residential area? should we break up that bigger area to smaller ones?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71353869
k127 (2021-01-18 15:41:45+00:00): Hallo WeinFlo,
kurze Frage zu deinen Änderungen, bzw. zu Knoten 6554643123 [1]: weißt du sicher, dass an dieser Stelle sich eine Furt befindet? Der Radweg war zuvor ja mal eine alte Bahnstrecke (Deggendorf—Kalteneck), es müsste also anstelle dieses Knotens eine Brücke geben.
Wenn du dir nicht sicher bist, lass es mich am besten hier kurz wissen — ich trage dann die Brücke nach.

Beste Grüße
Klaus

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6554643123
WeinFlo (2021-01-18 20:53:06+00:00): Hallo Klaus,
danke für die Info da habe ich bestimmt vertippt. Ich habe Den Bach untertunnelt. Wenn du dir sicher bist kannst auch eine Brücke einzeichnen. 
Frage:
Wie sehe ich wer etwas bearbeitet hat? Wollte auch schon des öfteren jemanden  kontaktieren weiß aber nicht wer der "Verbrecher war".
MfG WeinFlo
k127 (2021-01-19 13:43:34+00:00): Hi WeinFlo,

hab's gesehen, merci! (Ich verlinke das Changeset mit deinen Änderungen mal hier [1], denn es kann nie schaden, wenn andere sich dadurch einfacher durchklicken können.)

Wie sich herausfinden lässt, wer wann welches Objekt angelegt oder bearbeitet hat:
Am einfachsten geht das über eine Abfrage auf der Karte auf openstreetmap.org: Wähle den untersten Knopf der Werkzeugleiste am rechten Kartenrand, der mit Mauspfeil und Fragezeichen, und klicke in die Karte. Dadurch werden Objekte in einem kleinen Umkreis des Klicks abgefragt sowie alle Objekte innerhalb welcher dieser Punkt liegt (Bspw. die Gemeindegrenze). Links siehst du dann die Liste aller gefundenen Objekte, von der du das gesuchte Objekt auswählen kannst. Klicke drauf, und du siehst dann die Eigenschaften sowie Links zu bspw. Änderungssatz oder Bearbeitungsverlauf (dieser ist ganz unten).
Klicke auf die Nummer des Änderungssatzes, und du kommst an eine Stelle, an der du kommentieren/nachfragen kannst.
Dabei schadet es nie, im Kommentartext Links zum betreffenden Punkt, Weg, Fläche oder Relation anzugeben.

Gerade wollte ich dir noch was Ratgebendes zu den Umgangsformen im OSM-Wiki suchen und hier ergänzen, habe das auf die Schnelle aber nicht gefunden – naja, wird schon passen, mit den „Verbrechern“. :)

Beste Grüße
Klaus

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97720904

Eine Liste all der Änderungssätze, die du kommentiert hast, findest du hier: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=195189&commented

Und eine Liste deiner Änderungssätze, die von anderen kommentiert wurden, hier: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=195189
archie (2019-06-18 08:45:56+00:00): Du treibst dein Unwesen allso weiter. Der Tag admin_level ist fuer boundaries allso ways oder relations. Nicht fuer nodes! Hier ist er ueberfluessig, weil die Relation fuer Östergötland (county) (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/940675) schon Linköping als admin_centre beinnhaltet. Die Relation fuer das county (Östergötland) hat das Tag admin_level=4.
mbe57 (2019-06-18 09:01:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level
Zitat daraus: Usage
The admin_level=* values are also used for the capital=* and heritage=* tags. Besides administrative boundaries, the admin_level=* tag currently has very few usage on features tagged with government=*.
Dein Capital "county" ist ja korrekt. Und nett, aber nur innerhalb Schwedens.
user_3022894 (2019-08-05 14:27:33+00:00): Hi Thomas,
erst mal Willkommen bei uns und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag! Ich hoffe, dir gefällt das OpenStreetMap-Projekt!
Ich wollte nur fragen, ob du zufällig weißt, ob dieser Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697940696 der von dir eingezeichnet wurde, öffentlich begehbar ist oder ob das ein Privatweg ist. Ich frage, weil ich mich auf diese Notiz hier beziehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1828324 - wenn es ein Privatweg sein sollte, dann müsste man das nämlich noch extra markieren. Sonst könnte dort jedermann hergeleitet werden, deswegen. Viele Grüße, Lukas
thomaswerthwein (2019-08-06 08:44:34+00:00): Der Weg ist ein Privatweg, der von den Besitzern in unregelmäßigen Abständen frei geschnitten wird. Eigentlich ist dieser Weg immer nutzbar. Der Weg ist nicht markiert und nicht ganz eindeutig zu erkennen.
Grüße
Thomas
user_3022894 (2019-08-06 10:56:18+00:00): Okay verstehe, danke schon mal. Ich sehe, du hast ihn mit foot=yes versehen, was also heißt, dass Fußgänger grundsätzlich her dürfen. Nun gut, in Ordnung.
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
user_5359 (2019-06-20 12:42:26+00:00): Hallo! Bitte kontrolliere mal den Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698156336. Da scheint Dir der Schlüssel abhanden gekommen zu sein.
user_5359 (2019-06-22 08:46:20+00:00): Hello! Please check the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698156336. There you seem to have lost the key.
acsd (2019-06-21 11:57:41+00:00): Установлен знак  5.21 «Жилая зона»?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-18 08:46:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54220283, 54220420, 54220565, 54220790, 54221050, 54242514, 54242683, 54242742, 55143450, 55143519, 55143529, 55143786, 55143791, 55143809, 55143831, 55143839, 55143852, 55143871, 55143892, 55143945, 55242172, 55251149, 55251186, 55251198, 55251213, 55251242, 55251271, 55251297, 55279378, 55537495, 55700797, 55700825, 55845031, 55845050, 55982071, 56899475, 57353893, 57354009, 62055530, 62262555, 71161751, 71345323, 71347340.
zstadler (2020-02-23 13:15:46+00:00): Hello BMM994,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697956027 was added in this edit, but it has no tags. Is this a mistake or an incomplete mapping?
Supaplex (2019-06-18 09:43:05+00:00): 原先電話的格式才對
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71357610
jptolosa (2019-06-20 01:06:01+00:00): Por favor no duplicar las carreteras ya existentes!
Takogin (2019-06-21 09:18:05+00:00): Please do not use spamming building names, such as “VIVIENDA”, if this is a regular building without any commercial or industrial use.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71357863
jmapb (2019-06-18 12:46:04+00:00): Hi Lucila -- could you describe the source you're using for the names and boundaries of these landuses?

Thanks, jmapb
Constable (2019-06-18 16:51:46+00:00): hi, why did you replace all those aerialway=station with aerialway=yes? station is an improvement compared to yes, which is just a generic value, means all and nothing at the same time.
Here are your edits details https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=71358900
Thanks
Constable (2019-06-18 16:54:53+00:00): Also public_transport=station doesn't seem to perfectly match all those lift stations
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstation
ggorzki (2019-06-19 12:14:43+00:00): Hi, I followed the automatic suggestions for the Issues. These stations were marked as having "outdated tags" with "Suggested updates:
- aerialway=station
+ aerialway=yes
+ public_transport=station". 
But I am not sure what is the reason of these suggestions, I could not find any source or discussion.
Constable (2019-06-19 16:07:23+00:00): Hi ggorzki, thank you very much for your reply. I'll try sort this out with the OSM community via OSM help forum or talk-it mailing list.
Will get back to you as soon as I'll understand what's the best practice for this kind of objects
Thanks!
Constable (2019-06-20 08:21:25+00:00): Good morning ggorzki. As per this discussion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2019-June/066787.html (sorry, full Italian language there) and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste_Maps#Ski_lifts we reckoned aerialway=station is actually something more accurate than a generic aerialway=yes, therefore I'd like to restore that "station" value instead of "yes". Also, if you look at this area https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/46.5280/10.0993 you'll see the northern lift has the two stations still tagged as aerialway=station, and they are showing up on the map as blue dots, while the other lift has the arrival and departure stations tagged as aerialway=yes, which are not showing up on the map.
About public_transport=station tag instead, I'm a bit confused as the relative wiki page doesn't clearly state when to use and when not to.
I do hope you'll agree with me to restore the previous station tag value then.
If you like I could do it.
Thank you
ggorzki (2019-06-21 09:30:43+00:00): hi. If the changes look actually worse in the rendering, then I totally agree to reverse them. thanks for clarifying the situation
Constable (2019-06-21 12:57:26+00:00): Thanks for your reply, yes the chance does actually affect the render.
I'm going to restore the aerialway=station tag right now.
Thanks!
eggie (2019-06-18 10:18:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Tip: editor iD wil je van alles laten invullen, maar dat is niet corect.
footway=sidewalk verwijderen net als foot=yes en motor_vehicle=no/ bicycle=no. Dat laatste is allemaal default.
Let ook op dat je de paden niet vastmaakt aan de landuse forest.
Dit was je edit.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71358996
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-18 10:25:04+00:00): Ik heb het pad losgemaakt van de landuse en de onnodige access-tags verwijderd.
Gr eggie
Bazzabazz (2019-06-18 10:29:11+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Bedankt.

Mvgr.
JM82 (2019-08-24 09:34:45+00:00): Warum änderst du den Wegtyp hier? Highway = path ist schlichtweg falsch für den Gehsteig in einer Ortschaft. Genauso falsch ist, dass dieser mit dem Fahrrad befahren werden darf.
Ich habe es wieder richtig gestellt (wie es zuvor war) und bitte, solche Änderungen künftig zu unterlassen, da sie weder der Örtlichkeit/Realität entsprechen noch OSM-User dadurch verleitet werden sollen, auf dem Gehsteig mit dem Fahrrad zu fahren, da die falschen Tags gesetzt sind.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-10-26 17:09:45+00:00): Bitte beteilige dich an der Diskussion im Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=767007#p767007
eggie (2019-06-18 11:51:13+00:00): Dag Lucas.. Hier was e.e.a. wel helemaal verkeerd. Nu klopt het beter.
Er zijn echter wel nieuwe fouten bijgekomen.
Svp niet een vlak leisure=playground maken en daar nog een keer een node playground inzetten. Ook horen die playgrounds geen naam te hebben.
Het wandelpad "Sportvelden naar Reuverslaan" is vast niet de naam van het pad .. Dus verwijderen.
Winkels graag op de bestaande adresnodes bijtaggen. ...dan is adres en winkel verbonden.
bicycle=no hoeft niet op een footway.

.. en dan het belangrijkste.. Niet schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus! Zo is ook die schade aan die door de bebouwing lopende wegen ontstaan. Houd je edit bij één straat. dan opslaan .. uit de editmodus.. en dan pas schuiven. 
Kun je er wat mee?

MVG,
Eggie