piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freebeer (2019-05-03 14:53:53+00:00): hoi pascal,
after my previous revert, i viewed this changeset at https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=69634260 (beta achavi) with a pale OSM background to better see the present map data against the deleted items.
what i see appears to show the deleted roads redrawn (with what looks to be the wrong category for presumed residential drives).
so with my poor present connectivity, i will resist a revert as it would probably mess things up worse than now.  (analysis where a previous 3-second screen refresh is now 30-plus seconds is Not Fun.  i am a masochist but have boundaries...)

as always, thanks for keeping an eye on mass deletions.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-03 15:38:21+00:00): @freebeer thanks!
stevea (2019-04-27 10:09:00+00:00): Boundaries based on what source?  One of the three imagery_used layers in your imagery_used tag?  Boundaries don't "fit imagery," they simply "are." Especially when from authoritative sources, like the SCCGIS v5 and CPAD v2 data noted in our county wiki.

This amounts to needlessly replacing perfectly valid data with lower-quality, unsourced data.

Plus, as numerous residential landuse polygons and commercial landuses were removed or affected, for no apparent reason (these are all existing objects in the real world, which were reasonably mapped), I believe the best course of action here is to revert the entire changeset.

This strongly appears to be some flavor of vandalism.
stevea (2019-04-27 10:10:26+00:00): A boundary that went "to (too) far right" based on what source?  One of the two imagery_used layers in your imagery_used tag?  Boundaries don't "fit imagery," they simply "are." Especially when from authoritative sources, like the SCCGIS v5 and CPAD v2 data noted in our county wiki.

This amounts to needlessly replacing perfectly valid data with lower-quality, unsourced data.

Plus, as numerous polygons were removed or affected, for no apparent reason (these are all existing objects in the real world, which were reasonably mapped), I believe the best course of action here is to revert the entire changeset.

This strongly appears to be some flavor of vandalism.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-27 11:15:49+00:00): Hello,
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6432340896 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6432326223 next to each other as "town" and city".  Can you explain what you are trying to do?
SomeoneElse (2019-04-27 11:16:11+00:00): سلام،
شما https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6432340896 و https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6432326223 را به عنوان "شهر" و "شهر" اضافه کرده اید. می توانید توضیح دهید که چه می کنید انجام دادن؟
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-28 07:02:46+00:00): Hi AbidiSyed, welcome to OSM.

Same again, may I know the reason behind deleting several mapped POI and highways? Thanks. Furthermore, I can't see any "updates" here, you just deleted many map elements.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69634438
DaveF (2021-10-20 13:16:57+00:00): Hi 
What are these, similarly tagged objects meant to be.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68626475
Horza (2019-04-27 14:28:17+00:00): If you're going for most up to date, Esri tends to be a bit newer than Mapbox in Jacksonville
jguthula (2019-04-30 16:44:54+00:00): Hi Horza,

Thanks for looking into this edit. Our team in general verifies all the satellite imagery sources available and adds data as per the most recent one. In this particular case since the road remained the same in all the sources we added it as per Mapbox imagery and kept is as a source. 

Please do let us know if there are any other suggestions you came across. We are actively looking to work along with the local community and learn more from them.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
4004 (2020-06-14 23:59:24+00:00): источник в костеле?
Антон-1983 (2020-07-30 12:13:47+00:00): Да
eggie (2019-04-27 11:46:31+00:00): Hi..
removed addressinfo from building.
In the Netherland all addresses and buildings are import from the Dutch Kadaster.
Gr eggie
JJIglesias (2019-04-27 14:01:44+00:00): Currency in Bolivia is BOB, normally call Boliviano and short named as Bs, old Bs were Venezuelan VEB, currently VES if i am not wrong...
mueschel (2019-04-28 11:43:13+00:00): Thanks for fixing this - I was misled by Google...
eggie (2019-04-27 11:42:26+00:00): Hi Denvemmaps.. please don't add addresses to buildings. They are already present at the nodes.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-27 11:50:05+00:00): Address removed from building. The address can be found now at the BAG adressnode.
Gr eggie
rene78 (2019-04-28 10:16:57+00:00): Hi netcurli, willkommen zurück (nach 8 Jahren)!
netcurli (2019-05-05 09:17:59+00:00): Vielen Dank! Vielleicht gibt's in nächster Zeit wieder mehr beizutragen.
zors1843 (2019-04-28 05:34:02+00:00): Corrected.
Frans S (2019-04-27 11:02:20+00:00): Hello Walter.  Thanks for mapping here.
Please try to square (S key in iDeditor) the buildings you have mapped as much as possible ( most buildings are build rectangular and sometimes partly hidden by trees
Best regard
eggie (2019-04-28 05:18:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

De camping staat al op de kaart dus deze bijdrage zou weer weg kunnen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-28 06:11:31+00:00): De camping heb ik verwijderd. Die tag staat al volledig op het terrein.
Gr eggie
Frans S (2019-04-27 12:29:19+00:00): Hallo Femke. Bedankt voor het mappen hier
Ik valideer taken en adviseer mappers over fouten die veel voorkomen. In jouw mappings zie ik dat je gebouwen strak tegen elkaar tekent. Probeer een kleine opening ertussen te houden zodat je het gebouw ook vierkant kan zetten.
Verder prima werk.  Succes verder met mappen
Frans S (2019-04-27 12:32:59+00:00): Hallo, nog even dit.  De meeste gebouwen zijn rechthoekig, Als ze omringd zijn door bomen, volg dan niet de bomenrand maar extrapoleer de wand van het gebouw onder de boom.  Bedankt
eggie (2019-04-27 12:10:51+00:00): 13A is already present.. so u mau use the present addressnode for tagging.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-27 12:13:15+00:00): Merged info with 13A
SHARCRASH (2020-02-12 19:34:55+00:00): Hello! It would be great to respect what is on terrain so that you do not mislead people. This trail is used by sportive users for trail running, mountain biking... and is a dangerous area. Some people are cautious and will take their time whiel checking their gps but others might put their life in risk by paying more attention to their activity. Thanks for you consideration!
Miguel Goyanes (2020-02-12 20:16:53+00:00): Hello.

Sorry but didn't understand.
Do you want some action from my side?

Thanks
SHARCRASH (2020-02-12 20:30:06+00:00): You had plotted a sinuous parallel trail to the main trail. The problem is that it you plotted it and created several crossways where there is none. I passed there last year in summer so i compared by memory, satellite photos and Heatmap GPS traces. All which did not correspond to what you edited 10 months ago. So in my previous emssage i told you that it would be great to respect what is on terrain, no just plot whatever way. :)
SHARCRASH (2020-02-12 20:31:09+00:00): So in my previous message...*
Miguel Goyanes (2020-02-12 21:38:02+00:00): Thanks for the reply.

All the trails I've be plotting are with the GPS track, generated when I've passed there, in the background so they are all from places that I've passed.

That area in particular, as you can see at https://imgur.com/a/pcpIea6 is a place that I go to frequently.

Maybe I've missing what are the crossways that you're referring but if I didn't pass there, I've plotted it unintentionally. 

Thanks.
seav (2019-06-19 10:57:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of doing fantasy edits.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-30 15:04:36+00:00): There seems to be some duplication here (and it seems to predate the last two of your revert changesets that affected https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41382085 ).  The place of worship seems to be duplicated by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358849300/history .  One is one of nmixter's imports, the other looks like a separate GNIS import.
stevea (2019-04-30 17:16:58+00:00): In changeset 69743537, I conflated tags from the node (GNIS import) to the way representing the amenity, deleted the node, then stripped superfluous tags from BOTH the GNIS import and Nathan's (nmixter's) import off of the way representing the amenity boundary.  So, no more duplication.
seav (2019-06-19 10:52:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. This user has the habit of making fantasy edits.
Jordi MF (2019-04-27 12:23:36+00:00): Thank you for this edit,

I misunderstood your note.
nurdafur (2019-05-07 10:23:45+00:00): On the ncn Etappe 6 Kreuzlingen - Schaffhausen are some signposts maped as part of the route.
rom my opinion they should be excluded from the route.
mapperue (2019-05-07 11:35:11+00:00): Hi, signposts are allowed in route relations. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
nurdafur (2019-05-07 12:12:33+00:00): All right. I just thought it is silly to map 5 or 6 signposts out of maybe 20 or 30 in one route-segment while in all the other route-segments of ncn 2 there are none maped
Frans S (2019-04-27 13:08:28+00:00): Hello Walter. Thanks for mapping here.
I validate tasks and noticed that you did not square lots of  buildings. (78 out of 99 mapped buildings.) The majority should be squared as most buildings are build rather rectangular. Pleas map buildings, which are partly hidden by trees by extrapolating the walls and square each rectangular building with the S key in iDeditor. 
Best regards and keep mapping
Christian Hajek (2019-04-27 12:50:17+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe heute
Christian Hajek (2019-04-27 12:54:08+00:00): versehentlich ein Waldgebiet "beschädigt",
als ich eine bestehende Linie in einen Bach umwandeln wollte. Die Linie hatte wohl einige Relationen, die ich dadurch durcheinander gebracht habe. Leider kann ich diese Änderungen nich rückgängig machen. Kann mir jemand helfen?
Christian Hajek (2019-04-27 13:07:38+00:00): Hat sich wohl erledigt. Der Wald ist wieder aufgetaucht :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-27 13:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69639270 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-27 13:05:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69639270 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
ofc (2019-04-28 20:42:32+00:00): De PDOK luchtfoto's van het Reevediep lopen erg achter. Tussen de dijk en de koerskolk loopt een smal 'dijkje' waar wandelaars over kunnen lopen en een groot deel van dit gebied staat onder water. Vanaf het grasbeton pad op de kruin van de dijk is een trap aangelegd naar het pad naar de koerskolk.
De situatie is goed te zien op de 0.5m SuperView-1 foto's van 2019 op het satellietdataportaal, maar ik weet niet of die gebruikt mogen worden.
Ik ben hier gisteren langs gefietst i.v.m. het opnemen van GPX tracks van de grasbeton paden en ik heb hier ook foto's gemaakt. Hoofdzakelijk van paden, paaltjes e.d., maar misschien heb je hier iets aan:

Op de dijk, in de buurt van de kolk:
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_150153.jpg
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_150204.jpg
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_150205.jpg

Onderaan de dijk, in de buurt van de kolk:
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_150228.jpg
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_150233.jpg
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_150236.jpg
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_150239.jpg

Op de dijk, verder westwaarts:
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_150948.jpg
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_150950.jpg
https://xutrox.com/osm/IMG_20190427_151120.jpg
JJJWegdam (2019-04-28 21:56:13+00:00): De wijzigingensets die ik hier tot nu toe heb gedaan, heb ik allemaal via een mobiele app gedaan. Daar is de keuze uit luchtfoto’s helaas beperkt.

Ik probeer het met PDOK zo goed mogelijk te doen, maar als je aanpassingen hebt mag dat altijd natuurlijk
ofc (2019-04-29 09:41:05+00:00): Dank voor de toelichting. Dat verklaart waarom de PDOK foto's gebruikt worden. Ga vooral door met mappen.
Ik ben zelf beginnend mapper, dus ik weet helaas vaak niet hoe ik iets moet doen en doe daarom voorlopig alleen wat kleine aanpassingen.
JJJWegdam (2019-04-29 12:10:31+00:00): Geen probleem hoor! Iedereen hier is ooit begonnen. Welkom
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-27 13:05:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69639119, 69639120, 69639121.
seav (2019-06-19 10:44:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted.
hvalentim (2019-05-08 01:55:57+00:00): P.f. tenha presente que os nomes se devem escrever com maiúscula inicial. Consulte-se: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:name
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 14:56:56+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
pio2_122 (2019-04-27 13:31:11+00:00): Adresy są już na budynkach, nie dubluj ich w punktach POI.
user_5359 (2019-05-01 09:29:36+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of "naote"="P16396"?
MaximusSayan (2019-05-01 11:22:35+00:00): Typing error, this should be note
geri-oc (2019-04-28 09:48:53+00:00): Bei footway mit sidewalk im WIKI schauen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway

highway=footway
footway=sidewalk (wenn footway neben der Straße verläuft.)
eventuell surface, smoothnes, lit, ... ergänzen, wenn man vor Ort ist.
Gruß Gerd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-27 13:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69639896 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-27 13:35:03+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 69639840.
Road–Runner (2019-05-02 17:22:37+00:00): das landhaus gab es schon auf der karte
BCNorwich (2019-04-28 06:44:13+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've squared up the buildings you added and tweaked them a bit. There is a facility to square up buildings in the iD editor.

Regards Bernard.
viloan (2019-04-27 13:49:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abakus_uploader (2019-04-27 22:31:15+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ma-rt-in (2020-08-25 14:53:32+00:00): Hallo,
sind die Hydranten tatsächloch so benannt oder ist das eher eine Positionsbeschreibung? Also ist vor Ort der Name i-wo abzulesen?
vg
RnBck (2020-08-25 15:16:02+00:00): Hallo,

Die Namensgebung ist zur Positionsbeschreibung gewählt. Die örtliche Feuerwehr hat dadurch die Möglichkeit diese einfacher zu identifizieren.

Viele Grüße
ma-rt-in (2020-08-25 15:25:37+00:00): Hallo,
leider ist name dafür nicht gedacht und statt dessen sollte beser location:description benutzt werden.
vg
King Euro (2019-04-30 09:32:54+00:00): Danke! Ich war mir nie ganz sicher, ob das nun wirklich so passt oder nicht. Diese Änderung ging mir immer wieder durch den Kopf. :D
Hjart (2019-04-28 08:57:11+00:00): Der har fornyligt været en bot forbi, der ændre alle http:/ der blot omdirigerer til https:/ . Derfor må det anses for en fejl at ændre tilbage.
Jonas Hansen (2019-04-28 09:40:03+00:00): Der er tilføjet et photo så der burde ikke have været en osm ændring. Hvad er forskellen på før sættet og efter sættet?
Hjart (2019-04-28 10:45:41+00:00): Forskellen er s'et i http(s):/*
Hjart (2019-04-28 08:52:11+00:00): Denne ændring må da være en fejl. Når man åbner Brewpubs hjemmeside ser man netop det der ekstra s i linket: https://brewpub.dk/
Famlam (2019-04-27 14:50:36+00:00): Source = sattelietbeelden, excuus
viloan (2019-04-27 14:26:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
E de Wit (2019-04-27 14:41:20+00:00): Kollum*
user_5359 (2019-05-01 09:40:34+00:00): Hello! Please use English keys see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Iwf. What is the meaning of ಲಾಲ್=ಬಾಗ್?
Vonter (2019-05-03 03:50:29+00:00): Hi,
I have removed that key-value pair. ಲಾಲ್ ಬಾಗ್ is the name:kn value which I probably copy pasted directly on to the nodes, and JOSM had taken it as a key value pair.
I have fixed it now.
TravGW (2019-04-27 21:37:01+00:00): Reverted. 

Please review the wiki before making additional changes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
stevea (2019-04-27 22:57:57+00:00): Yes, thanks.  These came from the once-in-a-blue-moon-I-have-to-redact-some-foolish-changesets by a mapper who is very good at putting (and keeping) his foot in his mouth.  I think I've (also) deleted most or maybe all of these; I appreciate your assistance.

Weird last 24 hours with this guy, he stepped right into being a vandal and left us no choice but to delete his mess and clean it up with better data.  Oh, well, the map around Live Oak was messy for the last day and today, but is quite a bit better now, though there may still be some stray noise from the brush fire that roared through here by the name of Adamant1.  I'm glad it's over, but he says he "reported me to the DWG for edit-warring him."  OK, I'm not worried.
BCNorwich (2019-04-27 18:08:29+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've made quite a few corrections to your mapping including reinstating some designation of access. Please take time to ascertain OSM practices and please don't change other folks mapping unless you are sure you are correct.

Designations on public paths are to show legal rights.

Please do not remove experienced mappers notes, they are usually there for a positive reason, to help you.

Regards Bernard
Crabbo (2019-04-27 20:24:12+00:00): Thanks Bernard
I apologise. I read the guidance notes in the Wiki and it would appear that I misinterpreted them.
hvalentim (2019-05-08 02:02:21+00:00): Nomes próprios com maíuscula inicial s.f.f.
Consulte-se: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:name
4004 (2019-04-27 22:07:01+00:00): здравствуйте, и спасибо за обновление карты;
в осм обьекты обозначаются с помощью меток/тегов. некоторые можно проставить автоматически - вы я вижу вносили правки через онлайн редактор. добавляете точку, затем выбираете ее и слева вверху будет строка поиска - там найдете гидрант. у них можно проставлять много чего, тут расписано https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant и заодно приведены несколько ресурсов, где можно смотреть гидранты, насосы, водоемы и пасч.
если у вас есть список с координатами гидрантов, то их внесение можно полуавтоматизировать
mueschel (2019-04-29 07:27:19+00:00): Hi,
you used several uncommon tags here - could you have a look and change them?

alt_nam  -> alt_name
is_in:distritos  -> is_in:district
is_in:provincia  -> is_in:province

Thanks
Jan
Jorieke V (2019-04-30 09:11:51+00:00): Hi Jan, Thanks for spotting the mistake in alt_name. I must have been to quick! For the is_in this was on purpose, because this is the name locally used. Is it good practice to translate this to English, or should we rather use the locally used name? 
Cheers, 
Jorieke
mueschel (2019-04-30 09:44:51+00:00): Hi,
the is_in keys should use a global scheme, let's look at the numbers of usage:
167639x  is_in:province
78x is_in:provincia
73x is_in:província

12265x  is_in:district
78x is_in:distritos

There are no other spellings / languages used for these particular keys. If any kind of software has to deal with translated names in keys, it get much more complicated.

You can use localized keys if there is no world-wide equivalent to a special feature, but I think that the concept of a province or district is globally similar enough to use the same key everywhere.
Jorieke V (2019-05-02 08:11:00+00:00): Hi Jan, 
Thanks a lot for your research in this! I will change them. 
Best, 
Jorieke
BCNorwich (2019-04-27 18:21:10+00:00): I've reinstated the removed designations.
mavl (2019-04-27 16:04:16+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69571019, 69571934, 69572149, 69572252.
aseerel4c26 (2019-04-27 18:34:14+00:00): Hallo Asterix200, war es Absicht, dass du auch die Adresse an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112317240/history gelöscht hast? Was ist mit dem Gebäude? Wurde es abgerissen?
Asterix200 (2019-04-28 00:40:37+00:00): Das alte Gebäude ist abgerissen worden. Ich habe diese Woche in dem UW Ober Roden einen 110kV-Trafo bei der e-netz Südhessen aufgerüstet. Ich habe dem UW (engl. = substation) die Adresse gegeben.
eggie (2019-04-27 16:31:59+00:00): Svp geen adressen zelf aanmaken. Gebruik de adresnodes. met maps.me kan dat ook.
Gr eggie
Klioda (2019-05-01 20:21:44+00:00): Это всё подземные гидранты (под люками)?
Zhl-ROBERT (2019-05-03 18:31:59+00:00): Да подземные но почему-то картинку им присвоили как для наружнего
Klioda (2019-05-04 05:29:02+00:00): Это норма, просто эта иконка используется для отображения любых пожарных гидрантов).
Zhl-ROBERT (2019-05-04 05:50:02+00:00): А через какой промежуток времени он появится на карте? Мы просто планируем нанести весь город.
Klioda (2019-05-04 09:31:40+00:00): Имеете ввиду этот сервис?
http://karta01.ru/#zoom=13&lat=6963166.21389&lon=3345097.13491&layers=BTT
Точно не знаю как часто они обновляют данные, но пока ещё люки не появились.
Klioda (2019-05-04 10:00:56+00:00): Кстати, если нужно, гидрантам можно указывать инвентарные номера, диаметры соединений, даты последней проверки, модель и другое.