piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AkuAnakTimur (2022-02-25 12:25:01+00:00): You sure about that change (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761879775)?

For the record, I've attempted ground truth in December 2021, and sure enough, the condition of said segment (a one lane, undivided highway) may not warrant its classification as a tertiary highway.

Reference: own GPS trace, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AkuAnakTimur/traces/4092991
AkuAnakTimur (2022-02-25 12:33:26+00:00): additionally, this one too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AkuAnakTimur/traces/4092997

If this appears to be not concrete enough, I'm more than happy to try to include the "missing GPS tracks"
WadiShab (2022-02-25 18:35:10+00:00): Hello AkuAnakTimur. I have 
reviewed your GPX tracks, comments and note tag on the way in question. I will restore the data now and look out for these note tags and changeset comments about reclassification more thoroughly in the future. Thanks for adding this additional context. Have a good day-
MarcoR (2022-02-26 14:23:01+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o!
Ho controllato il gruppo di modifiche e l'unico errore che ho trovato è che avevi aggiunto il nodo dell'hotel come membro di due relazioni a cui però non apparteneva. Per maggiori info puoi leggere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Relation:multipolygon#Membri e https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Hiking#Relazioni_per_i_sentieri. Ho corretto il problema.
Alla prossima,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117841430
demon_box (2022-03-06 20:37:50+00:00): ciao Ennio... scusa ancora 1 domanda: quando metti il nome "Costa" su un edificio cosa intendi esattamente? "Casa Costa" oppure è la località Costa?
grazie
--enrico
ualios (2022-06-17 15:10:07+00:00): Ciao Davos1997, la rotatoria che hai creato presenta alcune criticità: non è taggata come rotatoria (junction=roundabout) né (di conseguenza) risulta a senso unico. Le svolte di collegamento alla rotatoria inoltre non sono complete e quelle esistenti non sono a senso unico. La SS18 a sud della rotatoria non è più accessibile a causa del senso unico che la collega direttamente alla ss107. Puoi vedere qui cosa succede con un navigatore:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=39.3560%2C16.0457%3B39.3573%2C16.0451#map=19/39.35665/16.04541
peggio ancora invertendo la marcia!

Inoltre quando si crea una rotatoria spesso si spezzano le relazioni (di strade, direzioni, ecc) che andrebbero poi adeguatamente ricostruite. In questo caso ne sono state interrotte 3:
Strada Statale 18 Tirrena Inferiore (6633877)
Strada europea E 846 (6256280)
Strada statale 107 Silana Crotonese (12692281)

Prova a correggere e se hai problemi chiedi pure. Per queste modifiche però sarebbe meglio servirsi di un editor tipo Josm, più completo e più sicuro.
ualios (2022-06-22 18:11:33+00:00): ok, risolto io
topolusitania (2022-02-25 17:13:46+00:00): Olá
Substituiste o footpath por track. Confirmas que o acesso ao castro já é praticável para 4x4 ?
Cumprimentos
Reino Baptista (2022-02-25 19:46:28+00:00): Olá,
Talvez na próxima terça-feira tenha essa resposta. Até lá repus o que estava.
Larmax (2022-02-25 15:41:58+00:00): Hei, eihän noita ruotsin- ja englanninkielisiä nimiä lue paikan päällä missään?
maraf24 (2022-03-06 15:08:43+00:00): Te dopływy to nie są nazwy.
Rzezimierz (2022-03-06 20:04:58+00:00): https://ibb.co/Gx8H14b - to zaiste są nazwy tych cieków wzięte z MPHP - https://wody.isok.gov.pl/imap_kzgw/
maraf24 (2022-03-06 21:21:46+00:00): To może to są nazwy w rozumieniu MPHP, ale to nie są nazwy wg OSM ani nazwy w użyciu.
Poza tym - to jest normalny import. Zrobiony bez dyskusji. Gdyby była taka dyskusja to wypłynełaby kwestia tych niby-nazw.
Colin Smale (2022-02-25 11:54:32+00:00): Hi... water=canal should be on a polygon enclosing the area covered by water, whereas waterway=canal goes on the centreline/fairway. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Dcanal
Shadowed Eyes (2022-02-25 12:11:36+00:00): Ta. Fixed
Colin Smale (2022-02-25 12:32:33+00:00): Thanks!
user_5359 (2022-02-26 15:02:05+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035038499. What is the meaning of the tag grabremote = yes?
redd (2022-02-25 20:10:35+00:00): Hallo RNwein,
bei geschlossenen Läden bitte besser mit disused:amenity=bar erfassen, so dass nicht gleich wieder jemand aus dem Gedächtnis die Bar einträgt. Zudem würde dann über StreetComplete regelmässig gefragt werden, ob hier schon was Neues entstanden sind.

Die High Fidelity Bar ist laut Website in der Brennerstr., und habe ich nun nach diesen Angaben erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9535617217

Gruss,
redd
redd (2022-02-25 20:12:37+00:00): Da es ein Shop war, natürlich meinte ich daher "disused:shop=wine"
mavl (2022-02-25 11:27:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117833496, 117833538, 117833684, 117833770, 117833896, 117833928, 117833945, 117834082, 117834151, 117834209.
KVI0n (2022-02-26 11:54:33+00:00): +correct Added
eggie (2022-02-25 11:53:42+00:00): Beste Kevin. Ga svp geen access=no 
Dat geeft vaak ellende. op barrier=bollard taggen. 
Wel evt. moped en mofa=yes als het een G12a fietspad is.
Ik heb wat aangepast.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-25 11:55:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

bicycle- en foot=yes is al default en hoef je juist niet toe te voegen. Kwaad kan dat laatste natuurlijk niet.
MKnight (2022-02-26 08:51:29+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier ein paar Dutzend Gebäude doppelt gemalt, ich habe sie wieder gelöscht.
söm4324 (2022-02-26 16:07:27+00:00): Oh, verdammt, habe ich nicht aufgepasst. Danke Dir für's Korrigieren!
KVI0n (2022-02-26 11:53:56+00:00): +correct Added
aixbrick (2022-02-25 14:23:24+00:00): Hallo,
mappen wir in OSM nicht normalerweise den Namen, wie er vor Ort ausgeschildert ist? Mir wäre neu, dass auf den Schildern zusätzlich ausgeschrieben "Bahnsteiggleis 27" (bzw. 44) steht.
Gruß
Chemnitzer13 (2022-02-25 17:26:35+00:00): Hallo,
ich hatte es für OpenRailwayMap gemacht. Es wäre am besten, wenn dort official_name ausgegeben werden würde, schließlich soll dort nicht dreimal derselbe verkehrliche Name stehen, sondern die tatsächlichen Bezeichnungen zur betrieblichen Unterscheidung. Dafür ist die Karte ja gedacht. Sie muss aber eindeutig überarbeitet werden bzw. sollten mehr Informationen ausgegeben werden.
Ich werde es in official_name ändern. Allerdings sollten dann auch alle Hauptbahnhöfe nicht ausgeschrieben werden, schließlich steht auf jedem Schild stets Hbf.


Gruß
aixbrick (2022-02-25 18:47:09+00:00): Danke fürs Ändern. Der Wunsch, official_name anzuzeigen, ist wahrscheinlich am Besten unter https://github.com/OpenRailwayMap/OpenRailwayMap/issues aufgehoben.
Hbf/Hauptbahnhof: Auf der einen Seite soll man es so schreiben, wie es auf dem Schild steht, auf der anderen Seite soll man nicht abkürzen. Einen Tod muss man sterben :-).
aixbrick (2022-02-25 18:54:48+00:00): Nachtrag: Genau genommen wird mittlerweile auch das "Rheinl." ausgeschrieben: https://www.eisenbahn-stolberg.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2022_01_20_Stolberg_Hbf_Schilderkombination_x10_F.jpg.
Chemnitzer13 (2022-02-25 20:57:27+00:00): Leider widersprechen sich nicht selten die Beschilderung, die für die Reisenden ersichtliche Bezeichnung sowie die offizielle Bezeichnung des Infrastrukturbetreibers. Letztere sollte eigentlich die Grundlage bilden, da sie am genauesten ist. Hbf wird aber ja überall so auch offiziell verkürzt geschrieben. Gerade was aber Bindestriche und Punkte angeht, stimmt manches nicht überein, obwohl das Schema von Stationsbezeichnungen mehr oder weniger festgelegt ist.
Larmax (2022-03-22 16:35:48+00:00): Nuokaan eivät taida olla virallisia, paikan päällä lukevia nimiä?
siparon (2022-02-25 12:21:36+00:00): See also https://terkep.szeged.eu/index.php/view/map/ 
HRSZ 22981/4
Firefishy (2022-02-25 15:44:58+00:00): Welcome! Your local knowledge is awesome. Thank you for your contributions. Happy mapping.
user_5359 (2022-02-26 15:00:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035059749. What is the meaning of the tag grabremote = yes?
SomeoneElse (2022-02-25 13:18:59+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5716 .
JeroenvanderGun (2022-02-25 14:27:58+00:00): At this time, Russia does not claim this island to be part of Russia.

Only Crimea is claimed by Russia. Donetsk/Lunask are recognised as independent. The rest of Ukraine is merely invaded/occupied.
user_2008655 (2022-03-31 01:38:41+00:00): 国道398号 vs. 石巻女川線？https://www.pref.miyagi.jp/documents/37755/289.pdf
urbalazs (2022-02-26 16:06:08+00:00): Szia! Ezzel a szerkesztéseddel elrontottál 90 Flixbus útvonalat, amit a https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117872221 módosításcsomagban kb. 30 perc munkával javítottam ki. Kérlek, hogy legközelebb figyelj oda, hogy a javításaid során ne okozz károkat is. Köszi!
zokert (2022-03-11 18:14:47+00:00): Szia!
Bocsi, nem szándékos volt. Nagyjából ugyanennyi ütközést kaptam. Az ütközések kezelése elég nehézkes. Próbáltam javítani, de ezek szerint nem lett tökéletes. Legközelebb, ha ilyen elég, ha csak jelzed és kijavítom.

Viszont te is elrontottál kb. 30 busz kapcsolatot a 3-as főúton a körforgalmak gyűrűinek egyetísével, amik a buszútvonalak miatt lettek feldarabolva. A körforgalmat fel lehet darabolni, hogy a kapcsolatok megfeleljenek a valóságnak(buszútvonalak, kerékpársávok, turistautak stb.) Éa még elég hülyén is néz ki a térképen, hogy a busz vagy bármi megkerüli a teljes körforgalmat. (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5122) Erről magyarul nem találtamtaláltam infót. Az igaz, hogy az út kapcsolatok így nem lehetnek szakadásmentesek, de eliveg az út kapcsolatnak nincs létjogosultsága ezen mondat alapján: "Ezen túlmenően nem szokás az utcarészleteket közös kapcsolat alá vonni". Ezt a mondatot itt találtam: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Beginners_Guide_1.3.
A "A térképezés folyamata általában véve" résznél.

Üdv.: Zoli
Hohe Schule (2022-02-27 12:38:23+00:00): *highways*
user_12531033 (2022-02-25 14:02:22+00:00): 感谢琉璃姐帮我修丰台站旁边的道路
praeteritum (2022-07-10 03:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123418562.
MxxCon (2022-02-26 01:25:15+00:00): Hello.
Please note that the way you map fire houses goes against "One feature, one osm element" guideline as documented here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Ignoring this guideline can make data less useful to consumers, such as duplicate search results or only 1 feature gets update with a more current information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117849751
XxPBxX (2022-02-26 01:35:23+00:00): Hello, I added the building and moved the points from the wrong location. If I am incorrect, please share how I  should have edited and I will remember that for the future edits. Thank you in advance
MxxCon (2022-02-26 01:51:31+00:00): You'd map it either by putting all the relevant into in tags on the building polygon itself OR on POI nodes and keep building with just minimal unique info.
In this case name and operator tags has duplicate info on both building and POI.
Also generally it's good to position nodes close to where the main entrance is. That way navigation and routing and search software would be able to direct people to where they should go
XxPBxX (2022-02-26 02:03:06+00:00): Thank you for the info. I will absolutely change the way I edit.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-26 11:30:59+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels to `name=`. That's for proper names only. Use `description:zh=`. Also beware "brownfield" has different meanings, especially with `landuse=brownfield`, and the usage in HK.
attili1 (2022-03-24 07:39:17+00:00): Hi Elissa,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this area, I observed that some of the buildings such as: way 1035080532,way 1035080505,way 1035080527,way 1035080511,way 1035080369, way 1035080368,  are not matching with any of the satellite imageries. Would you mind sharing the sources used to create these buildings?

Regards
Manoj
praeteritum (2022-07-10 02:07:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417709.
FJili (2022-02-25 18:19:01+00:00): Hi Jude DiMedio, could you try to not edit US and Philippines in one changeset next time? It makes the area too large.
yellowsoar (2022-03-24 15:53:47+00:00): Please consider to edit one region at a time. Or anyone else that trying to search historical changeset within the boundary box of this changeset will need to go through your contribution as well.

Keep mapping & happy mapping!
eggie (2022-02-25 14:22:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-25 14:24:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback..  BING map is 'outdated' en ligt op veel plaatsen verschoven. Gebruik PDOK actueel 7cm

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
praeteritum (2022-07-10 02:01:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417640.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 01:57:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417634.
gileri (2022-03-20 23:18:40+00:00): Bonjour, Kubii sont présents sur les deux bâtiments ?

Le format des horaires est prévu pour suivre un format compréhensible par des programmes, sa syntaxe est disponible ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126827997

Si besoin je peux faire la modif', pas de soucis :)
Q-OSM (2022-03-21 05:49:19+00:00): Salut ! Effectivement il y a un soucis avec ces deux batiment. Je le corrige tout de suite !

Pour ceux qui est du fuseau horaire je veut bien que tu le fasses....
gileri (2022-03-21 08:36:48+00:00): Merci, c'est fait pour les horaires aussi :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118724576
KVI0n (2022-02-26 11:52:36+00:00): +correct Added
AgusQui (2022-03-02 22:02:42+00:00): Porque habilitaste este puente?!!
Estaba correctamente mapeado en construcción, que es lo que corresponde con la realidad. Por favor deja de editar cosas que no conoces de primera mano, estás agregando errores que conducen a malos ruteos. Las ediciones que coinciden con la realidad se consideran vandalismo y conlleva el bloqueo.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-25 15:09:38+00:00): Thanks
user_5359 (2022-02-26 12:28:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 01:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417628.
ivanbranco (2024-10-18 10:32:57+00:00): Parte di questi alberi sono stati cancellati in questo changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158039161
Frans S (2022-02-27 10:30:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
 When you map highways, please take the width into consideration. <2 mtr width , tag as path.
Also connect nodes of highways to each other where they are close to each other
Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117852154
jodd (2022-02-25 15:03:04+00:00): Als source wollte ich angeben: survey; Bing
praeteritum (2022-07-10 01:32:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417445.
lefuturiste (2023-12-22 18:16:13+00:00): Le nœud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1672566149/history
a été supprimé j'imagine car tu pensais qu'il était en dupliqué de l'imprimerie, mais en fait c'est qq de l'imprimerie qui a fait un take over du nœud Société Générale et du coup après le nœud Société Générale a été recréé.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 01:30:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417422.
PT-53 (2022-02-26 07:57:03+00:00): Hallo plennert,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diese Fläche
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/922535534/history
einen Hinweis "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.84692&lat=47.77989&zoom=18&opacity=0.34

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
plennert (2022-03-03 06:50:31+00:00): hat sich, glaube ich, mittlerweile erledigt.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 01:10:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417242.
VictorIE (2022-03-01 03:43:31+00:00): Is this an An Post post box? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9534890479#map=19/53.32686/-6.26838
praeteritum (2022-07-10 01:08:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417221.
Mashin (2022-02-25 21:19:08+00:00): Hi David,
is this public land (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035108025) protected or anyhow important? `boundary=administrative` is though not the correct tag for it. It is used for administrative areas like countries, states, ...
David Reik (2022-02-26 00:34:03+00:00): This section of Hamden has several north-south corridors that have road names on the town website, but have no roads, or even traces of past roads, in the corridors.  I only wanted to show the corridor labeled "High Rock Road" to show that a particular tract was not public land.  The eastern border of the private tract is formed by the High Rock Road corridor.  Now, a track goes through the private land, and the private land is not posted "No Trespassing."
Mashin (2022-02-27 00:22:37+00:00): I assume you are talking about this map from Hamden GIS: https://server2.mapxpress.net/webdata/Hamden/Zoning_Map/Hamden_Zoning_Map.pdf

Most likely those parcels are left for a possible extension of the exiting roads in case of a further residential development in the area. This is a bit of a controversial topic with many discussions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Parcel). I've mostly seen people being against including parcel/zoning data into OSM, because how much effort it takes to keep it up to date.
Though the tag should definitely be changed. There are few instances of `parcel=*` so maybe something like `parcel=yes`.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 01:06:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417205.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 01:02:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417184.
eggie (2022-02-25 15:57:45+00:00): Beste Kevin...
access=no  ?  Welk bord staat hier dan?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-25 16:19:21+00:00): Die 'fout' zat er al in. 
access=no omgezet naar motor_vehicle=no met moped en mofa=yes..

emergency yes uiteraard laten staan.
Groet eggie
praeteritum (2022-07-10 01:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123417175.
user_5359 (2022-05-15 16:17:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/44813178/history. What is the meaning of the tag wikidata = 5.6?
praeteritum (2022-07-09 20:49:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123413734.
eggie (2022-02-25 16:30:35+00:00): Kevi.. Wat ik doe bij screening is .. Kijken of het nog routeert.
Wanneer je op een G12a fietspad een bollard zet zul je moped en mofa=yes bij moeten taggen op de paaltjes.
bicycle=yes en foot=yes hoeft niet.
Dat is default. 
Ik heb het aangepast

MVG
eggie
KevinvD (2022-02-25 16:37:07+00:00): thnx voor de feedback, in neem het mee voor in het vervolg. Was mij niet bekend dat die tag er dan ook aangehangen dienen te worden
eggie (2022-02-25 16:43:13+00:00): Dat komt omdat we al die verschillende verkeersregels- en deelnemers  hebben in Nederland, maar OSM kent maar één smaak. Alles met een motor is een motorvoertuig, maar dat klopt voor brommers niet in de Wegen verkeerswet.  Vandaar.
Dus als er ergens een C12 bord staat 
dan
way 	motor_vehicle=no & moped=yes & mofa=yes & traffic_sign=NL:C12

Deze link 'moet' je ergens maar opslaan
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

Daar zie je hoe te mappen bij de verschillende verkeersborden.
mapse
eggie
praeteritum (2022-07-09 20:46:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123413631.
eggie (2022-02-25 16:24:49+00:00): Beste Kevin.. 

Dit klopt toch niet al lijkt het logisch.
Je kunt wel opgeven wat de hoogte is, maar het is geen tunnel. 
Er is al een viaduct. Het is het een of het ander. 
tunnel=yes heb ik verwijderd.
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-12 18:13:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120901144 where the changeset comment is: revert PeckerHead vandalism (DWG Ticket#2022050610000189)
Shaun das Schaf (2022-02-26 18:36:33+00:00): Hallo Karthoo,

meiner Meinung nach sollten bei den ganzen Packstationen die Namen entfernt werden.

Dass es eine Packstation ist, wird durch amenity=parcel_locker beschrieben, die Marke DHL ist in brand- und operator-Tag enthalten und die Referenznummer im ref-Tag.

"DHL Packstation 196" wäre für mich allerhöchstens eine description.

Wie siehst du das?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Karthoo (2022-02-28 09:38:15+00:00): Hallo Shaun das Schaf,

Ich halte die Namen auch nicht für notwendig, da sie nur den Inhalt anderer Tags wiedergeben. Kann also mMn weg.

Gruß,
Karthoo/Leon
praeteritum (2022-07-09 19:45:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123412012.
praeteritum (2022-07-09 19:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123411959.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-02 21:34:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120479603 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some name:uk removals in Ukraine where it is likely that a Ukrainian name would exist.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5938 for the block message and way 191464452 for an example.
eggie (2022-02-25 18:23:43+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail gehad Bij deze alsnog.... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
aceman444 (2024-08-25 15:52:41+00:00): Ono road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035131868 motor_vehicle=permissive is totally wrong tag. Opposite of what the traffic sign says. Please try to learn tag meanings before applying them.
praeteritum (2022-07-09 19:36:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123411901.
eggie (2022-02-25 18:06:44+00:00): Beste Richard..
natural=beach ?
Is dat wellicht een vergissing?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-25 18:11:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dsand

Wellicht natural=sand voor dat gedeelte bij de werpheuvel en de thuisplaat. 
Dat buitengebied landuse=grass???
eggie (2022-02-25 21:27:18+00:00): natural=beach..De buitenste mp heb ik omgezet naar landuse =grass.
De mp ook aangepast. Maar even de rendering afwachten.
De werpheuvel veranderd in =sand
MVG
eggie
user_11435438 (2022-03-01 12:54:33+00:00): 京广高铁正线我记得应该还没有完工吧？
user_12531033 (2022-03-01 12:55:52+00:00): 主体完工了，但是丰台站周围市政道路赶不上四月一号开通……
user_11435438 (2022-03-01 13:15:54+00:00): 好吧。此外我注意到还有残留的constrution=rail标签。既然是铁路完工了，那么这个也是不需要的。完整的在建铁路标签是railway=constrution+constrution=rail，然而一些编辑器（说的就是iD）在把在建铁路改成铁路的时候不会删掉constrution=rail，于是会留下多余的过时标记。
user_12531033 (2022-03-01 13:17:50+00:00): 今天没时间改了（