piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2021-03-06 04:28:05+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set (without any OSM key). 
ARTICLE97	1
ATT_DATE	867715200000
CAL_DATE_R	-33782400000
DEED_ACRES	30.199999999999999
EOEAINVOLVE	1
FEESYM	M
FEE_OWNER	Town of Lynnfield
FY_FUNDING	1969
GIS_ACRES	0.81376603999999997
GRANTPROG1	SH
GRANTTYPE1	S
LEV_PROT	P
MANAGER	Town of Lynnfield Conservation Commission
MANAGR_ABRV	M164CC
MANAGR_TYPE	M
OBJECTID	38980
OS_DEED_BOOK	5578
OS_DEED_PAGE	274
OS_ID	164-1273
OWNER_ABRV	M164
OWNER_TYPE	M
POLY_ID	1273
PRIM_PURP	C
PROJ_ID1	164_SH_5
PUB_ACCESS	Y
SITE_NAME	Bow Ridge Conservation Area
SOURCE_TYPE	DD
TOWN_ID	164
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning (!) of the keys.
See https://www.osm.org/way/914037536, https://www.osm.org/way/914037535
TomPar (2021-03-06 04:37:31+00:00): Thanks for the catch.  Missed removing MassGIS metadata from a parcel boundary import before uploading to OSM.  Fixed.  (and on another recent changeset too.)
IsaacLeman (2024-01-09 23:17:05+00:00): Why did you name this West Ridge Butte?  This is one of the three buttes included in the name "Cline Buttes."  I understand this butte resides near the West Ridge area of the Eagle Crest resort, but I've never heard of anyone referring to this peak as anything other than Cline Butte - North (since it is a piece of the larger Cline Buttes structure).  Oregon Board of Geographic names doesn't recognize the name West Ridge Butte, either.  And there is a rock/aggregate company on the east side of this peak that uses the name Cline Buttes Aggregate.  Can you clarify where the name came from?
AgusQui (2021-03-27 17:06:48+00:00): La Ruta 4 se llama Maradona y ese nombre esta reflejado en la relacion de la ruta, pero las denominaciones locales se mantienen
AgusQui (2021-03-27 17:07:10+00:00): ¿has visto cartelería con ese nombre en la zona?
Brilej (2021-03-08 11:57:55+00:00): Hi Mashin,

this cleanup was long overdue, thanks a lot for it. But IMHO you should not mix geometry improvements with retagging operations.

Kind regards,
Bogumil
Mashin (2021-03-08 18:18:25+00:00): You're right. I got carried away by the editing too much and then it was too late to split it into several changesets. 
Will remember for the future.
user_5359 (2021-03-14 06:06:19+00:00): Hello! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
angys (2021-03-06 10:10:31+00:00): Hello, plz dont put SS2 in the name.
Just put BHPetrol as brand
then add branch=SS2
and u should not tag with convenience shop also, should be in separate tag
banban_msm (2021-03-07 12:18:43+00:00): Tq. Noted and edited tags.
user_11435438 (2021-03-07 17:17:02+00:00): This has been partially revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100583907 . Restore population data to china_population.
Tilia_J (2021-03-07 12:53:45+00:00): Ik zag je edit en dacht.... Moerascipres, moet dat niet Metasequoia glyptostroboides zijn?

Kijk ik op Wikipedia.nl zie ik weer watercypres (terwijl ik dus altijd Moerascypres zeg.) Zoek ik op Taxodium distichum dan kom ik op Wikipedia inderdaad op Moerascipres.

Hoe dan ook, de boom in de tuin van een vriend heb ik correct gedetermineerd als Metasequoia glyptostroboides.

Google ik op Metasequoia glyptostroboides dat dan kom ik vaak de Nederlandse vertaling "Chinese Moerascypres" tegen. en staat op Wikipedia "Chinese Mammoetboom" en blijf ik in verwarring achter....

Kun jij als wikipediaan misschien wat licht over de zaak doen schijnen?
Infodisiac (2021-03-07 13:33:28+00:00): Ik speel de vraag door naar Torenkraai (via mail) die de boom gedetermineerd heeft (en superveel van bomen weet). Ik heb hem alleen wat opgeschoven.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:56:35+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
syntex (2021-03-15 11:52:24+00:00): Ok, ale czemu usunąłeś pozostałą część STP?
Mariusz 2M (2021-03-15 12:15:26+00:00): Nie można prowadzić prac sprzętem mechanicznym (np. koparką) pod czynną linią napowietrzną, więc wschodnia część nie będzie na razie realizowana - do czasu przebudowy eNN i eWN oraz skablowania czegoś tam dla PKP. Jak zaczną kablowania to powiększę o kablowania, ale wtedy już pewnie budowa będzie ogrodzona. Na razie nie ma pozwolenia, więc formalnie nie ma placu budowy i grubszych drzew nie mogli wyciąć.
Nie dziel się tylko tą informacją.
syntex (2021-03-15 12:31:21+00:00): Tak, ale mogłeś zostawić drugą część obszaru jako landuse=proposed
Mariusz 2M (2021-03-17 08:54:06+00:00): A da się podzielić poligon w edytorze?
Jeżeli Ty dodałeś obszar STP "proposed", to obszar jest od północy ze 20% za duży, tam np. pompownia Tesco nie będzie wyburzana: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4bk5BfZArmw/YFG-pM3SumI/AAAAAAABBIY/mze_9COhQbo9dKqixj8sI9Ib06SNp-YVACLcBGAsYHQ/s984/2021.03.17_obrys_centralnej_polnocnej_granicy_STP.JPG
syntex (2021-03-17 09:30:35+00:00): Ja go dodawałem na podstawie grafik ze strony metra, ale mogę go zmniejszyć. W JOSM można łatwo dzielić obszary, w iD to nie wiem.
syntex (2021-03-17 10:59:16+00:00): Poprawiłem
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:56:59+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-03-08 04:00:03+00:00): 一般 wikidata 標籤加到 relation，不然加到溪流會有多段需要加上去
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100522865
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:57:23+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:59:29+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
YTaulai_lyft (2021-03-18 12:11:54+00:00): Hello Baloo Uriza,

My name is Yuliya and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
While mapping in Orange county, CA, I noticed that you changed some tags for the ways, such as “lanes=*”, “turn:lanes=*”, “bicycle:lanes=*” at several ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401461852, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401469982, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401300484) on March 6, 2021.

Based on aerial and streetside images, I can identify only 3 lanes for that segment of the road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401461852). According to the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes) “the number of lanes is referred to the lanes available to the traffic using the main highway=* key, in this example and also by definition of lanes=* key motorized traffic, what excludes bicycle lanes”. Also, I can see that you applied “cycleway=shared_lane”, but there are no any identifiers, like “sharrows” or physical sign. Such “road markings are usually there to highlight a cycle route or to remind drivers that you can cycle there.” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane). Do you have any additional sources that provide evidence for such edits? If so we would love to see it. Please let me know if you have any further questions or evidence that could help me to understand your point in this case. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused.

Thank you, Yuliya
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-18 13:13:51+00:00): There's four lanes.  The bicycle lane counts as a lane.  The whole idea that a lane doesn't count just because of modal access is both preposterous and doesn't agree with other types of reserved lane tagging, does it?  The wiki seems extremely wrong here. just logically working it out, especially a lane that even motorists are required to merge into in California in order to turn right.
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-18 13:15:29+00:00): In the case of shared lane, that's clearly visible where the lane line changes to a broken line.  In California, this indicates that the lane is shared with other traffic for that length.
YTaulai_lyft (2021-03-19 14:03:12+00:00): Hello Baloo Uriza,

Thanks a lot for your answer and clarifying your point of view. Probably the misunderstanding arises from the diversity of views on those tags in the OSM community (e. g. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-May/036164.html). We’re trying to take note of the physical properties of the lanes, such as width, and to observe the principle of uniformity, as well. 
However, thanks for your time and opinion, it was good to know! 

Best regards, Yuliya
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-19 15:11:07+00:00): No problem.  Sorry to suck you into this rabbit hole.  I'm hoping things move in a more consistent direction in general vis-a-vis reserved lanes in general.  I don't understand the resistance to this generally given that how Fairview got retagged including the bicycle lanes is consistent with other kinds of lane tagging, such as that for HOVs and buses, complete with access tags.

I do understand the need to understand the width, I just don't have a good method for measuring that given travel and "standing in traffic" implications.  I would have added lanes:width=* if I knew the values, though they are at least wide enough to fit a car down as can be seen in the Bing imagery at various points.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
habi (2022-03-23 10:20:17+00:00): Ciao eric6quatre
Tu as ajouté toutes les piscines (privées) ici avec `location=yes`.
Je ne comprends pas, quel sens cela a-t-il?
Salut de Berne,
habi

PS: Je suis ici a cause de https://maproulette.org/challenge/23471/task/119957152 :)
eric6quatre (2022-03-23 10:29:37+00:00): Salut,
En effet, le simple "yes" n'a pas pas d'intérêt. Je mettais "outdoor" ou plus précisément "Extérieur" dans le menu déroulant. Je ne comprend pas ce qui s'est passé...
habi (2022-03-23 18:22:07+00:00): Merci pour la correction!
habi (2022-03-23 18:28:31+00:00): As-tu une idée de la manière dont le `location=yes` se trouve sur les piscines ?
Il y a en effet encore quelques piscines de ce type en Suisse: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1h5V
Il s'agit peut-être d'un bug dans ID :)
eric6quatre (2022-03-24 14:47:39+00:00): Non aucune idée...
Peut être un logiciel utilisé pour l'édition qui contient cet attribut.
habi (2022-03-24 17:21:42+00:00): J'ai parlé de ce problème avec quelques  personnes sur IRC (#osm-ch) et c'est une combination d'un pas fixé 'preset' dans iD et un automatisme dans taginfo.osm.ch
Une histoire belle :)

Au moment il'ya +700 fois le problème dans tout OSM :)
Supaplex (2021-03-08 03:55:15+00:00): 一般加額外標籤加到 relation 上面，不然溪流可能很多段，必須每段都加上去
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100523952
DaveF (2021-03-06 15:18:37+00:00): Hi
When editing in the UK could you please include changeset comments in English. 
Please make them clearer than 'New Object'

All UK National Rail stations are already mapped. Please don't add further duplications.
DaveF (2021-03-06 15:20:42+00:00): Apologies, Tramlink are also all mapped.
DaveF (2021-03-06 15:28:17+00:00): Apologies again: Underground.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:59:49+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Gazer75 (2021-03-17 14:43:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Please be careful when editing landcover relations in the future. You made a pretty big mess of things. I have hopefully fixed it all and properly mapped the golf course area.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
user_2066394 (2021-03-06 10:21:57+00:00): Hausnummern wären noch interessant.
el_eco_stef (2021-03-06 10:31:30+00:00): Hab ich vor, noch nachzutragen ;)
user_2066394 (2021-03-06 10:56:13+00:00): Einwandfrei :-) , gutes Gelingen weiterhin
abakus_uploader (2021-03-06 23:32:14+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
user_5359 (2021-03-07 06:16:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary ! This is definitely no primary street.
Mex (2021-03-06 17:12:02+00:00): Thanks for the fix.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100525346
Jorisbo (2021-03-06 20:55:34+00:00): my pleasure, gr Joris
CjMalone (2021-03-08 15:26:26+00:00): Hey, I think there is some tagging mistakes in this.

The outdoor seating area should be leisure=outdoor_seating, with operator=*. Not outdoor_seating=yes.

outdoor_seating=yes would go on the pub.
RAC_UK (2021-03-08 22:13:57+00:00): Hi, your right there are mistakes.
I've fixed some of these but am wondering how some ended up wrong.
eggie (2021-03-06 09:23:47+00:00): Dag Dallco  Voeg even amenity=doctors toe.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddoctors

De website=www.indebuurtvoordebuurt.nl  heb je laten staan, maar die klopt niet meer.

MVG
eggie
hauke-stieler (2021-03-06 22:47:31+00:00): Hi,

zwei Anmerkungen zu deinen Änderungen:

1.) Deine Disc-Golf Linie beginng an der Hochspannungsleitung, das heißt du hast eine Verbindung zwischen deinem Disc-Golf und der Hochspannungsleitung erstellt. Das soll sicherlich nicht so sein.
2.) Deine Änderungen sind in einem Gebiet wo auf aktuellen Luftbilder Büsche und Bäume sind. Hast du das vielleicht an der falschen Stelle eingetragen?

Zumindest das mit der Hochspannungsleitung solltest du korrigieren und auch schauen, ob deine Daten an der richtigen Stellen liegen.

Grüße
Hauke
JohannesDeml (2021-03-08 07:59:52+00:00): Hallo Hauke,

vielen Dank für die Anmerkungen! Das Problem mit der Hochspannungsleitung war mir nicht bewusst, ist korrigiert!
Zu zweites: Ja, das Ende der ersten Strecke ist zwischen mehreren Bäumen. Ich habe die ganz genaue Position noch nicht physisch festgestellt, würde das aber gerne machen, sobald ich weiß, dass ich hier alles richtig eintrage. Ich habe vor allem die Frage, wo der Discgolf Überpunkt hinkommt und wie ich diesen mit den einzelnen Bahnen verknüpfen kann (ich habe derzeit nur eine von 18 Bahnen eingezeichnet).
Ich hatte die Frage auch schon in das Forum gepostet :)
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=821259

Beste Grüße
Johannes
hauke-stieler (2021-03-08 10:56:34+00:00): Hi,

alles klar, danke fürs Anpassen :)

Grüße
Hauke
Bert Araali (2021-03-07 02:19:20+00:00): Hello Temadri, you changed the taxiway C again after we corrected it 3 days ago.  Please, all of you in the team, be aware that none of the imagery has the correct offset.  The correct offsets are for this area stored in the offset database in JOSM and field checked. For your information, Maxar imagery is exactly the same as the ones used by this HOT project. If you can't find them they are: -0.53; -5.83 for this area (name in db: Maxar Imagery 2021 - Airport Defense Zone - Misoro - Bunonko.
I would appreciate if you correct your changes.
Bert Araali (2021-03-06 22:49:42+00:00): Hello Joyce, In this changeset you deleted 13 buildings and then replaced them with less accurate versions. Please, don't do this, add what is missing, change what is incorrect so we can trace the history in a cooperative way, but don't delete without consulting the community member who added it.  Respect others work and ask yourself why you consider it wrong and include it in the comment. If you need any help please do ask. I kindly ask you or someone in your HOT team to repair the damage done or provide a comment that justifies such deletions.
Regards,
Bert Araali
tars4815 (2021-03-06 15:32:21+00:00): Hi, thanks for your valuable contribution to the project. Please remember to square buildings on the map if they have regular shapes. You could it by selecting the feature's boundary and clicking Q on your keyboard. Otherwise, by right-clicking on the feature on ID editor, you will find the "square" button. Thanks again and keep working! :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100526950