piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2020-01-12 16:25:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
marczoutendijk (2020-01-12 19:14:01+00:00): This is NOT around Casa Viaja but south of Corral de Almaguër!
user_5359 (2020-01-12 20:12:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. We didn't use leisure=pitch for golf.
M!dgard (2020-01-12 16:38:03+00:00): I drew it to Aalter instead of Aalter Venecolaan because of https://www.elia.be/en/infrastructure-and-projects/infrastructure-projects/aalter
Brian Reavis (2020-07-13 00:54:20+00:00): What's the story with Laurance Lake Road? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551745111) Why did you change it to a footpath? I'm not seeing anything online about it being closed / washed out / etc. For what it's worth, I drove it last last fall.
Oregonian3 (2020-07-13 02:37:01+00:00): Whoops, that was completely unintentional! Thanks for fixing it.
sanchi (2020-01-17 09:44:31+00:00): Hola.

Estoy viendo que en las ediciones que estas haciendo de añadir edificios estas poniendo edificios superpuestos sobre lo que ya existe. 
Tienes que tener cuidado y tener en cuenta lo que ya existe. Modificar lo que haga falta y no ponerlo encima ya que sino salen duplicadas las cosas.

Saludos.
aachso (2020-02-03 08:36:08+00:00): Hi, apparently you created a node with no tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7126334266
aachso (2020-02-03 08:36:39+00:00): Hi, apparently you created a node with no tags in this changeset. What was your intention?
maferikotupi (2020-02-03 16:56:11+00:00): Good morning, sir. It's fixed. A problem with vespucci on mobile...
maferikotupi (2020-02-03 16:56:52+00:00): Vietnam restaurant is very good !
aachso (2020-02-04 07:32:34+00:00): Thanks for fixing. I'll make sure to try the restaurant one time! :)
M!dgard (2020-01-12 17:03:48+00:00): Elia's 2018 investment plans mention "vervanging van de laagspanning in de onderstations Centrale Harelbeke, [...]" making it likely that this substation is near the former plant.
camelCaseNick (2020-01-13 05:04:09+00:00): Hallo,
hier (und nachfolgenden CS) sind die Tags wikidata=Q22693895 und wikipedia=de:Schwendermarkt verloren gegangen. Darf ich davon ausgehen, dass das ein Versehen ist?
CamelCaseNick
chachafish (2020-02-07 05:00:50+00:00): Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. The address you added here pops up as an error because there is no "N. Uinta St." The street is named, "Uinta Street." Abbreviations are not used and "N" is not part of the street name. Thank you :)
Dmytro O (2020-04-02 22:20:03+00:00): Hi
Did you delete following way? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753880688

Why is that? 

You also had broken the routing? Now you cannot drive from Bora to Auchan
Yunkers (2020-04-03 19:33:50+00:00): There's no barrier between so the way was incorrect. It looks like there was a restriction I forgot to delete. I have changed it, everything should work now.
Dmytro O (2020-04-04 15:49:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=50.08624%2C19.97940%3B50.08580%2C19.98004#map=17/50.08558/19.97541

this turn does not work too
Dmytro O (2020-04-04 15:50:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=50.08567%2C19.97921%3B50.08573%2C19.97870#map=19/50.08561/19.97883

And this turn is not allowed
Yunkers (2020-04-05 11:00:56+00:00): I didn't do anything with these two however:
- the first turn (McDonald->Bora) wasn't possible, because the link was tagged as oneway. Corrected
- the second turn is tagged correctly, but most routings sadly can not use complicated restrictions. Not sure if anything can be done here.
Dmytro O (2020-04-05 12:51:13+00:00): I've added +1 lines to Bora and to service road. 

Also added u-turn restriction from New Huta-to-new Huta

Now Routing should work, but intersection is too simplified, from my point of view
KH01jp (2020-01-14 22:54:05+00:00): 阿賀野川および支流の水域情報が全て飛んでしまっています。
Leo Slager (2020-01-13 00:19:26+00:00): De routes van N92 waren zo vernield dat het mij meer dan een half uur heeft gekost om ze weer te repareren. Ik zie hier dat je met JOSM werkt en dan is het toch wel gewenst om alles in de juiste volgorde te zetten. In de rechter kolom van het relatievenster kun je controleren of alle wegen in de juiste volgorde staan.
Freek Bes (2020-01-13 20:00:39+00:00): Dag Leo, ik weet niet of 'vernield' hier de juiste woordkeuze is - maar alsnog bedankt voor je reactie. Ik heb namelijk wel degelijk op de volgorde gelet (sterker nog, de haltes van de N92 stonden überhaupt niet op volgorde, deze heb ik handmatig goedgezet). De wegen heb ik eerst automatisch laten sorteren via JOSM en vervolgens heb ik de loop via Landsmeer toegevoegd op de juiste plek, in de juiste volgorde. JOSM gaf echter de foutmelding dat een weg in principe niet 2x in dezelfde relatie mag voorkomen, dus daarom was de route niet compleet. Ik zie dat je dit alsnog hebt gedaan, dus ik neem aan dat dat de correcte manier van taggen is. Ik zal hier in het vervolg mee rekening houden!
Leo Slager (2020-01-13 21:33:37+00:00): Tja, ik had mij ook moeten realiseren dat je de route niet opzettelijk beschadigd hebt achtergelaten. Bij alle 4 malen dat je de route bewerkt hebt, werd weer een nieuwe beschadiging aangebracht. Tenminste 2 werden veroorzaakt door het opknippen van wegen. De 2 nieuwe wegen staan dan vaak in de verkeerde volgorde en in OSMinspector wordt dat dan weer zichtbaar als een onderbreking van de route. TIP: automatisch sorteren nooit gebruiken. Vooral niet als de route heen en weer gaat over dezelfde weg  !Waarschijnlijk krijg je juist dan die foutmelding (die ik nog nooit gezien heb) en verdwijnen de tweemaal in de route voorkomende wegen. Met als gevolg een geweldige onderbreking van de route.
En als je dan een paar dagen daarvoor die route in Zaandam hebt omgeleid agv de nieuwe dienstregeling en daarbij een ononderbroken route hebt achtergelaten, dan gebruik je wellicht een sterkere term zoals vernielen ipv onbedoeld beschadigen. Overigens kan er ook nog sprake zijn van achterstallig onderhoud van de route. De route buiten Zaandam heb ik toen niet vergeleken met de dienstregeling. En die routewijziging door Landsmeer stamt dus al van dec 2018, maar is kennelijk nooit eerder aangebracht.
eggie (2020-01-12 19:37:33+00:00): Dag Blue..Probeer als het even kan om op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. 
Voor je volgende edit... 
Wanneer Klaasboer Niek niet meer bestaan dan alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen. Nu heb je ook het hle kadasteradres verwijderd.
Dit waren je edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79482583
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-12 19:45:01+00:00): Antiek China heeft hetzelfde adres 35 als de overzijde van de straat. Verder zie ik 2x nr 30 op nodes die je hebt toegevoegd.
Kijk je nog even?
Adressen zijn import van het Kadaster. Graag op de juiste adresnode bijtaggen uitzonderingen daargelaten.
MVG,
Eggie
Nakaner (2021-01-14 20:34:40+00:00): Hallo,

in diesem Änderungssatz hast du bei mindestens zwei Lf7-Signaltafeln die Geschwindigkeitsangabe entfernt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1830520721/history und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4946198667/history). Es gelingt mir nicht, mit der angegebenen Quelle, die ich gesichtete habe, die Änderung nachzuvollziehen. Daher möchte ich dich bitten, mir darüber Auskunft zu erteilen, was der Anlass dieser Änderung ist.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2021-01-16 19:22:49+00:00): Hallo,

wie ich unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/flierfy/history sehen kann, bist du fleißig am Mappen. Könntest du dir bitte die Zeit nehmen und meine obige Frage beantworten?

Viele Grüße

Michael
flierfy (2021-01-17 17:47:20+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Es sind ja nicht nur die zwei Knoten, sondern noch sehr viel mehr bei denen der Geschw-Tag verloren gegangen ist. Ich hab den lf7-Tafeln auf der Strecke ihre Geschwindigkeits-Einträge zurückgegeben.
Wie die Einträge verloren gehen konnten, kann ich mir nicht erklären.
Viele Grüsse,
Stephan
IlBano (2020-01-19 10:05:18+00:00): Buongiorno mtbcarte,
con questa modifica un sentiero è stato trasformato in una strada secondaria che, nonostante il nome, nella classificazione usata in OpenStreetMap è una "strada di collegamento tra piccole città" (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dsecondary).
L'ho ripristinata a sentiero.

Ciao
abakus_uploader (2020-01-12 23:30:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mueschel (2020-01-13 11:00:58+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here. All these nodes are duplicates of existing addresses mapped to buildings. 
They also have some strange tags like 

    @geometry=center
    @id=way/59379068
    osm=house_for_convert

Could you check this?
evgenykatyshev (2020-01-13 14:23:06+00:00): Oh, thanks. I check it again and fix it tonight.
evgenykatyshev (2020-01-13 19:10:01+00:00): Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79529967
muralito (2020-01-12 23:58:10+00:00): Hola.

La regla es "One Feature, One Element" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Una_caracter%C3%ADstica,_un_elemento_OSM

La pista de BMX, la podes mapear como un nodo o como un way, pero no con las dos cosas a la vez.
c3112n (2020-01-16 09:42:24+00:00): Welchen Sinn haben diese komischen Flächen, die du an der (H) Lessingschule eingezeichnet hast?
Die erstrecken sich vom gepflasterten Geh-/Radweg über die Parkbucht, bis auf Hälfte der Straße.
BS97n (2020-01-16 10:05:26+00:00): Schau es dir mal vor Ort an. Das ist eine Fläche, die direkt an den Geh-/Radweg anschließt, aber durch einen Tiefbordstein eindeutig von ihr getrennt ist. Da steht zum Beispiel die E-Bikegarage drauf. 
Ich habe sie deshalb direkt mit der Straße verbunden, weil sie ja direkt an die Straße angrenzt. Dass das im Luftbild aussieht, als ginge es bis in die Mitte, liegt daran, dass wir die Straße vereinfacht als Linie darstellen. Wäre das nicht miteinander verbunden, wäre kein Routing quer über diese Fläche möglich, z. B. vom Eingang der Stadtbücherei zum Schulhof.
 Ich wollte demnächst auch noch den Parkstreifen als parking:lane der Straße mappen. Dann ist auch etwas klarer, dass an die parking:lane, die ja noch zur Linie Unterstraße gehört, direkt die Fläche anschließt. Ich bin da nur bisher nicht zu gekommen, weil ich direkt den ganzen Straßenzug machen wollte.
BS97n (2020-01-16 10:17:45+00:00): *an die Fläche anschließt
BS97n (2020-01-16 13:16:28+00:00): https://westnordost.de/p/9169.jpg
Hier sieht man ganz gut, wie die Fläche mit einem Tiefbordstein vom eigentlichen Weg getrennt ist, und dass das Pflaster eine andere smoothness hat, weil es gefast ist.
Vinber (2020-01-20 10:45:08+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

nouvelle-nouveau, un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, alors s'il vous plait, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628

Et n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...
Dakon (2020-01-13 15:57:27+00:00): Warum verschiebst du das highway=bus_stop von den platforms auf die stop_position? Das entspricht dem, was auch sonst am weitesten verbreitet ist und auch vom Wiki so empfohlen.
flohoff (2020-01-15 13:36:29+00:00): Moin,
IMHO reicht ein maxspeed:type=DE:urban ohne ein maxspeed nicht. Für die allermeisten anwendungen ist es reichlich egal was der maxspeed:type ist..

Guck dir das nochmal an.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79484494
user_5359 (2020-01-12 20:11:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3021499452/history over 100 meters.I move the node back to the original position.
user_5359 (2020-01-13 05:27:37+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wir zeichnen ein gate normalerweise als Punkt auf der Straße ein. Wenn Du diese als Linie einzeichnest, sollten diese mindestens einen gemeinsamen Punkt mit der Straße haben, damit diese von den Router erkannt werden.
Zudem bedeutet access=no, dass keiner auch der Eigentümer nicht dort fahren darf. Korrekter wäre private oder permissive.
Eksiter (2020-01-14 22:09:24+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise. Ich habe sie umgesetzt. Ich hoffe es passt jetzt.
Mike Baggaley (2020-01-13 12:11:35+00:00): Hi Tony, hope you don't mind me contacting you, but I just wanted to let you know that to tag a crossing, you need to put highway=footway or path + footway or path=crossing, rather than highway=crossing. I've changed the 3 on Old Worden Ave to footway - feel free to change to path if you think that is more appropriate.

Cheers,
Mike
TonyS999 (2020-01-13 16:29:11+00:00): Thanks Mike. I knew the tagging looked different than usual  - couldn't quite see what.
Cheers
Tony
Polarbear (2020-06-02 15:43:12+00:00): Hi vanagaudi, barrier=tool_booth is  for road toll (Maut), not for parking fees. 
Instead, use for example barrier=lift_gate and fee=yes, depending on the local situation. If you want to map the machine that sells the parking ticket, please use "amenity=vending_machine" + "vending=parking_tickets". 

I have removed the wrong toll booth, but you might know where the actual barrier and the machine is?
vanagaudi (2020-06-02 16:52:24+00:00): Hey Polarbear! Definition "toll booth": a special gate or line of gates on a road where drivers have to stop and pay a toll. And that is exactly what I mapped. There is a gate observed by a person collecting money before he opens the gate and let you pass to the parking space. There is no vending machine and even you're not getting any parking ticket. For me best to describe this as "toll booth". Any other suggestion?
The barrier is been found exaclty on that location where you removed the toll booth tag.
Polarbear (2020-06-02 20:48:55+00:00): Well, it is not toll. 
I'd suggest shop=ticket, as it is a fee for parking and maybe an indirect entrance fee for the sights around. 
Even if the collector does not give a paper ticket, it is a virtual ticket, and she probably has to give you a receipt if you ask for, otherwise the operation is questionable tax-wise.
Polarbear (2020-06-02 21:40:27+00:00): Mapillary images show an old white caravan in 2018 and a new wooden hut in 2019 as a base for the fee collector, at the fork of the driveways; thus shop=ticket is even more reasonable. 
The gate is further back at the entrance (node 3741810420), and according to the imagery not operated by the fee collector for each car. There is no barrier at the point of the parking fee collection. 
The signage shows the fees under a blue P sign, thus the fee is for parking and not for using the driveway. 
You have tagged the fee already on the car park w370485514, thus duplicating them on a node being passed is redundant.
mueschel (2020-01-14 11:41:47+00:00): Hallo,
was ist das denn für eine Fläche? Das Tagging scheint nicht zu stimmen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762699268

Gruß
hlfan (2020-01-15 11:59:49+00:00): Das ist der Gast-/Schanigarten, dessen Rendering sollte laut Wiki funktionieren; Typ ist definitiv verbesserungswürdig
mueschel (2020-01-15 16:35:56+00:00): Als Frankfurter kenne ich den Begriff nicht...
Die Fläche mit Sitzmöglichkeiten im Freien an einem Restaurant wird so getaggt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating
hlfan (2020-01-15 22:00:10+00:00): Verstehe, war wohl zu tief im Wiki versunken
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating#Schanigarten_optional
Ist in Arbeit
hlfan (2020-01-15 22:03:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79623486
Hoffe es passt jetzt
mueschel (2020-01-15 22:24:42+00:00): Interessant... dieses Tag wird dort im Wiki seit Juni 2016 erwähnt, du bist aber der erste der das jemals an einem Objekt verwendet.
Solche regionalen Tags halte ich für eher problematisch - ähnliche Bestimmungen gibt es überall, da sollte ein einheitliches Tagging benutzt werden.
Ich würde ein seasonal=* Tag verwenden und opening_hours für den genaueren Zeitraum und Uhrzeiten.
user_5359 (2020-01-12 20:09:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
Myazyk (2020-02-26 10:05:33+00:00): Рекомедую не позначати частини населено пункту, як landuse=residential. Використовуй теґ name без приставки "Присілок" та теґ place=neighbourhood
Mannivu (2020-01-12 19:41:28+00:00): Il nuovo standard è qui http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/nomi-vie-con-numeri-romani-td5923552.html#a5923553
viloan (2020-01-12 19:41:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jan Olieslagers (2020-08-12 09:03:15+00:00): Why was the UPHU made into a local_code rather than an ICAO?
aachso (2020-01-13 09:38:56+00:00): Hello Olclarkey19, welcome to OSM! Please don't make changesets spanning this large of an area, as it makes reviewing them very difficult for others. Thanks.
freebeer (2020-01-13 02:58:24+00:00): hola alan,

i see a weirdness in the map rendering, a discontinuity that when investigated shows a line attempting to represent a bollard that is not rendered (should be a point along the way) as well as a discontinuity along the way.

a bollard does not imply a road break, quite the opposite, as it is physically possible for pedestrians and cyclists, among other narrow vehicles, to pass.

if motor vehicles like mofas and motorcycles are legally forbidden, that should be noted, rather than breaking the continuity of the way.

if properly mapped, the bollard(s) will be represented on osm-carto as a black dot, and routing for pedestrians and cyclists and the like can continue to use this unbroken road, which is not possible at present.
Alan Bragg (2020-01-13 19:12:47+00:00): Interesting. Whats on the ground is a line of about 15 boulders creating a wall with a space for pedestrians on the east side. The road is none existent. I re-mapped the area with a path, the sidewalk connections, fire hydrant and bike rack.
gileri (2020-01-14 21:21:28+00:00): Bien vu, merci pour la correction !
PT-53 (2020-01-13 09:53:52+00:00): Hallo Odirolf,
steht diese Schranke
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7126769857/history#map=14/48.0118/9.9895
wirklich in einem Wald westl. von Rot an der Rot, Baden-Württemberg oder war das ein Versehen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-14 10:41:29+00:00): erledigt
maro21 (2020-01-14 01:10:32+00:00): Czemu usunąłeś przejazd?
eggie (2020-01-12 20:43:12+00:00): CJ.. Daar heeft in een vorige changeset iemand het fietspad als lane in de hoofdrijbaan opgenomen..en het aparte fietspad verwijderd.  Dat verkeerlicht kon dus weg. 
Dit was die changeset https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74373719
MVG,
Eggie
openstreetmap-se02 (2020-01-13 15:49:04+00:00): Ah oke.
km2bp (2020-01-12 21:32:53+00:00): Jeśli dodajesz  sklep to dodaj też do niego niezbędne  dane kontaktowe.  OSM to też mapy offline w aplikacjach posiadające wyszukiwarkę która działa bez internetu  i książka telefoniczna offline.   https://www.wideorejestratory24.pl/dane-firmy
Glassman (2020-01-13 03:49:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good. I went ahead and added the northern most bldg to the Riva relation you created in your first edit. It's easier to do with the JOSM editor than in the browser editor. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79487245
btwhite92 (2020-01-24 16:35:52+00:00): How are these Ventura Ave NB & CA 33 SB links 'motorway_link's if they don't connect to a motorway? Northbound link points you straight into a two-lane road, and the southbound link comes straight from a two-lane road.
eggie (2020-01-12 22:15:59+00:00): Gag Jstorma.. Editor iD heeft de neiging om alle paden aan de landuse vast te plakken. Je kunt dat voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen. 
Het zuidoostelijke wandelpas eindigt ook ergens in de landuse en loopt niet verder.
.. maar wellicht is dat ook in werkelijkheid zo?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-12 22:26:51+00:00): Het pad heb ik even losgemaakt .....
Abruzzzo (2020-01-13 14:42:01+00:00): Dear Diego,
"Some improviments" is a useless changeset comment as it tells us absolutely nothing that we didn't already know.
Diego Sanguinetti (2020-01-18 20:00:36+00:00): I'm sorry. But "some improviments" is for "minor changes". I set tram stops and added them to the route. So, this change is for improviment what was missing in this route.
Alecs01 (2020-02-05 19:38:27+00:00): Per questa strada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762727742 vedi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80604884
PenokeanRange (2020-03-04 19:05:03+00:00): Hi victoire Tsajio, I noticed you made some recent changes to Mape Reservoir which has caused the relation for this reservoir to be completely changed - the name removed and the tags changed. 
Now the reservoir is only named on a few of the riverbank features that you created and there is no relation that is grouping these features together anymore. What is the purpose of this change in modeling?