piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber (2022-04-17 14:57:31+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne suis pas sur de comprendre. J'ai l'impression que c'est l'ajout abandoned=railway là ou il y a railway=abandoned ? 

Le commentaire est assez peu compréhensible ?

Une piste pour comprendre ?

Bonne carto
Bernard59118 (2022-04-17 18:19:27+00:00): Exact, Osmose demande d'ajouter abandoned=railway , là où il y a railway=abandoned
user_5359 (2022-04-18 17:18:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052279345. What s the meaning of the tag byggnad = yes?
Gåseborg (2022-04-19 09:25:43+00:00): Thanks, that was a mistake, good that you spotted it!
HirschKauz (2022-04-17 14:26:55+00:00): Hi os-emmer. Das hättest Du gar nicht löschen und neu machen müssen: an dem Objekt fehlte aus irgendeinem Grund das [building=yes] 
https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/376833881 
Schon mal auf die Idee gekommen, den vorigen Mapper zu kontaktieren und nachzufragen?
Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119791823
4004 (2022-04-18 02:42:32+00:00): разве одна не дверь к лифту, а вторая к лестнице?
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 17:28:34+00:00): This street was never called Fleewood, Fleewood is a nonexistent name and is completely alien. As i drive here, i can confirm the street sign says Fleetwood Road, not Fleewood Road.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
4004 (2022-04-18 02:44:04+00:00): но https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=551853022481824&focus=photo ???
Rico557 (2022-04-18 06:55:51+00:00): Кто-то врёт)))
Rico557 (2022-04-18 06:59:19+00:00): Это дом близнец https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119798356
такая же ситуация
4004 (2022-04-26 01:00:57+00:00): Пока так https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5947
4004 (2022-05-01 00:32:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5969 одним участником меньше (пока)
4004 (2022-05-01 00:42:17+00:00): lol https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%D0%94%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B9%202860
user_5359 (2022-04-18 17:40:11+00:00): Hallo! Sieh Dir mal die Abfrage http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(way%5B%22parking%3Alane%3Aboth%3Atype%22%5D(%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D)%3B%3E%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=52.26846;6.15833;17&R
an.
Müsste es nicht statt
parking:lane:both = parallel
parking:lane:both:type = on_street
nach dem Wikiartikel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane nicht eher lauten
parking:lane:both=parallel
parking:lane:both:parallel=on_street
?
Cartographer10 (2022-04-18 17:59:55+00:00): Hey,

Thanks for checking. You are completely right. I misinterpreted the wiki. I corrected it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119871946

Greetings,
Vincent
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
maro21 (2022-04-20 21:22:49+00:00): To nie są błędy. Te ostrzeżenia z edytora iD możesz ignorować.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 17:48:12+00:00): Canadian Open Government Licence has been approved as compatible with ODbL by the Licence Working Group (LWG).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
nevw (2022-04-17 05:00:26+00:00): Hi
I notice you have joined the entrance from Mountain Hwy to an exit on Colchester Rd and another from Mountain Hwy to Albert Ave.
These should not join at the same node even when close.
See "Roundabout with correct connections" labeled image at right side on the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
nevw (2022-04-18 01:49:59+00:00): no response, reverted and realigned ways.
kaelwd (2022-04-18 02:26:14+00:00): Thanks, I wasn't aware of that rule. Is this technically not a roundabout then? You aren't supposed to be able to turn left from mountain highway using the main body of the roundabout, instead it has slip lanes.
nevw (2022-04-18 05:00:37+00:00): The wiki describes the difference between roundabouts and rotaries and this one with right of way whilst on the roundabout seems to fit the roundabout criteria, even though there are slipways to bypass the roundabout, but I am no expert. Slip ways like this seem to be gaining favour in traffic management - I guess due to reducing interaction with other traffic on the roundabout.
I expect that if you missed the slip lane, you could still enter and exit where you say your not supposed to go. This happens at times when unfamiliar with the area and the gps is a bit uncertain or slow. There would be no left turns there if it was illegal.
nevw (2022-04-18 06:28:20+00:00): correction…
There would be ‘no left turn’ signs there if it was illegal.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
aTarom (2022-04-24 15:48:42+00:00): Hello, the changes have been reverted because it's not an official name, only temporarily for Semana Santa.
Cheers.
https://sevilla.abc.es/provincia/sevi-fuentes-andalucia-adopta-nombre-ucrania-y-ciudades-durante-semana-santa-202204071400_noticia.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
eggie (2022-04-20 15:01:56+00:00): Rechts van dit editvak zat een vlak zand dat ook bos was en lid was van twee mp relaties. Ik heb dat zand verwijderd en de relatie ook. 
Even de rendering afwachten. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-20 15:02:53+00:00): Als het goed is moet dat zo weer bos worden.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Bask (2022-04-24 15:54:20+00:00): Czemu zmieniłeś highway Skrzydlatej na pedestrian? Z tego co pamiętam, to przy moście jest znak strefa zamieszkania, oraz zakaz z jakimiś wykluczeniami (ich konkretnie nie pamiętam, ale raczej powinien być dojazd do Hotelu Daria), czyli raczej access=destination co naniosłeś w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117111394. Czy coś się tam zmieniło?
Bask (2022-04-24 15:56:06+00:00): korekta: znak zakazu z wykluczeniami
Aleksander Hugo (2022-04-25 08:26:18+00:00): Tak, zlikwidowano strefę zamieszkania i jest tam obecnie zakaz ruchu. Wyłączone są dojazdy i rowery, więc podobna organizacja ruchu jak na Piotrkowskiej. Ze względu, że jest to teraz przestrzeń głownie dla pieszych takie oznaczenie wydaje mi się najbardziej odpowiednie.
Bask (2022-04-25 16:12:46+00:00): Zdjęcie z dzisiaj: https://i.imgur.com/LgGfbGM.jpg
Fakt, znieśli strefę zamieszkania, ale wciąż można wjechać jako wjazd docelowy, pozwolisz, że jednak to poprawię.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
JERONIMO DA COSTA SILVA (2022-04-16 18:52:32+00:00): Agência de Marketing Digital - Agência Apolo 11 Rs - Fotógrafo 360
Professor luís vieira 759 sala 1
centro
Tapes - RS, 96760-000
(51) 996284777 
email: jeronimosilva1983@gmail.com
 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=3202970743174723177
https://www.instagram.com/jeronimocosta_rs/ 
agência de marketing digital
Mannivu (2022-04-19 11:52:58+00:00): Ciao. "Earth" non è una traduzione corretta di "Terra" in questo caso; "Earth" indica solo il pianeta Terra, la terra che si trova su strade e campi è "dirt"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119795199
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ivanbranco (2022-04-17 07:58:32+00:00): Hi TaneliPee,

the correct tag for capes is natural=cape, not place=cape: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcape

Also the wiki tells to map capes as nodes. What you think about it?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
rene78 (2022-04-18 11:53:30+00:00): 👍
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_11435438 (2022-04-18 13:35:43+00:00): Nice job, but why delete this bridge? WAY: 930640757
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119795883
Sal73x (2022-04-18 15:10:28+00:00): Not sure which bridge you mean but if I haven't, usually is because I determine if it's a bridge or tunnel on depending what type of water way flaws under. Feel free to add if you think it's necessary.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Tomas Straupis (2022-04-17 05:49:00+00:00): Landuse irgi labai blogai. Tiek principinis padengimas neteisingas, tiek ir techninis žymėjimas neteisingas. Net sunku komentuoti.
Rhoon (2022-04-18 15:29:20+00:00): nice :D
Danke!
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 19:29:43+00:00): Canadian Open Government Licence has been approved as compatible with ODbL by the Licence Working Group (LWG).
eggie (2022-04-16 20:19:07+00:00): Dag MrGysta

Om sluipverkeer te voorkomen voeg je toe access=no
Verboden Toegang... 
access=no is eigenlijk bijna altijd fout.
Welk bord staat hier dan?

Verder staan op het fietspad nog alle tags 
maxspeed 60


Graag reactie
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-16 20:22:56+00:00): Het is zeker geen fietspad.. Wel staan er hier paaltjes volgens mij. Zo'n paaltje kun je toevoegen en zal motorvoertuigen tegenhouden.
moped en mofa=yes hoort er dan nog wel op.
Kijk je nog even?
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-04-16 20:32:40+00:00): Beste MrGysta
Ik heb het aangepast met een paaltje en een C12 verbord. Verboden voor motorvoertuigen.

MVG
eggie
emvee (2022-08-30 17:36:21+00:00): Hi \Mike,

In https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9670848644 there is:

image=file:///home/mikael/Downloads/IMG_20220416_150950429_HDR.jpg

That might work on you own PC but not for others?

Can you update the picture to a site like https://commons.wikimedia.org and update the link to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons

Greetings,

Martin.
maraf24 (2022-04-30 09:56:37+00:00): Nie ma tam zakazu jazdy rowerem.
NieWnen (2022-04-16 20:55:48+00:00): Te proposed to już tyle czasu wisi, że może lepiej to wyrzucić :D?
lyctkel (2022-06-25 17:00:08+00:00): Hi Adam_piszczek,
I guess you meant building=tower at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052313745?
Maybe silo fits better: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:man_made%3Dsilo
Adam_Piszczek (2022-06-25 19:13:25+00:00): ok
A67-A67 (2022-04-16 22:48:38+00:00): The speed limit was correctly tagged at 130 km/h. There's even a note on the ways to clarify.
A67-A67 (2022-04-16 22:50:04+00:00): I've reverted the changeset.
Essex_Boy (2022-04-17 21:29:26+00:00): This slip road has never been 130kph ever. Please do not revert the change set otherwise you are inputting incorrect information. I was there today...it is NOT 130kph.
A67-A67 (2022-04-18 00:24:47+00:00): There is only a sign 'start of motorway' (g1) here. After that sign the legal motorway speed limit of 130 km/h is the speed limit until the first sign indicating an explicit speed limit. That sign after the ramp, so on the ramp the speed limit is 130km/h.
A67-A67 (2022-04-18 00:31:57+00:00): I've restored the speed limit. These situations have been discussed extensively. I know it's counterintuitive, but it's the correct interpretation of the traffic signs, verified by Rijkswaterstaat.
A67-A67 (2022-04-18 00:35:34+00:00): Article 21a of the traffic law tells the legal speed limit after sign G1 (start motorway).

https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3:c:BWBR0004825&hoofdstuk=II&paragraaf=8&artikel=21&z=2021-07-01&g=2021-07-01
user_5359 (2022-04-17 07:16:00+00:00): Hello! Please stop overpainting existing structure with line with contradictory keys! I delete the https://www.osm.org/way/1052313905
user_5359 (2022-04-19 04:35:23+00:00): I have revert this change set.
eggie (2022-04-16 20:40:13+00:00): Hi... The right way to do it is to remove all the shopinfo from the BAG addressnode and tag or copy the new info at the new address (BAG Addressnode)
.. and leave the old addressnode intact. 
I removed the shopinfo.
eggie
eggie (2022-04-16 20:46:43+00:00): You may tag the the shop at the new address.
Greetz,
eggie