piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2022-04-15 22:31:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse (2022-04-15 23:05:42+00:00): Yearsley, from survey 9/4/2022, tr8723a
user_5359 (2022-04-16 15:04:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9669161848/history. Did you mean the key step_count instead of step_sunt?
SomeoneElse (2022-04-16 15:07:25+00:00): Yes!
user_5359 (2022-04-16 15:10:22+00:00): Done!
bxl-forever (2022-04-16 03:14:15+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for editing the map for the first time.

I appreciate you describe your changes.

Just one thing here: you added the number of levels on a few houses.  I wish to warn you of a mistake: the ground floor should always be counted.  If a house has the ground floor + one floor above, then we put "2" into the database.  Don’t worry, I’ll fix it.
mariotomo (2022-04-16 16:42:48+00:00): hi. please, don't forget to specify what kind of "tourism=information" you are tagging.
wiki says: »Requires information=*«
Peter Newman (2022-04-17 14:26:52+00:00): You might want to also add this additional tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:club%3Dscout
Mikey Co (2022-04-17 22:28:10+00:00): Added.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 23:15:02+00:00): "The Company continues to execute the planned closures of restaurants that no longer fit its long-term strategic plan," it wrote in its second quarter report.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 23:16:02+00:00): the swiss chalet location is closed, closed, closed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-05-04 05:58:12+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إدخال الأماكن الخاصة للخريطة العامة
nevw (2022-04-16 07:35:20+00:00): Hi
I fixed some accidentally dragged nodes. I don't think we have permission to use data.gov.au to edit the OSM
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Sources
nevw (2022-04-16 07:43:27+00:00): cor...actually this dataset is ok to use and is supplied by data.gov.au
https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/geoscape-administrative-boundaries
santamariense (2022-04-16 01:26:26+00:00): Oi Dienifer,
Bem-vinda ao OSM. Muito bom que esteja detalhando o mapa nas areas onde conheces. Só uma coisinha importante. Não adicione informação duplicada. No caso dos correios, já que tu adicionou a área dele, não deve adicionar tambem o ponto, pois isso é duplicar informação.
Bons mapeamentos e se precisar tirar dúvidas estou a disposição,
[]'s
santamariense
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119768984
jmapb (2022-04-16 03:31:22+00:00): Hi there -- I and other local mappers would appreciate if you could give accurate changeset descriptions instead of re-using the same one over and over. Thanks, J
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-16 16:39:41+00:00): I will. I am sorry if i tripped into a thriving online community. Just updating the businesses there and making the business names more visible. Because in the end that’s what maps are for, to find places.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
hanchao (2022-04-16 09:40:44+00:00): 不要添加不存在的东西，已回退

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119776946#map=19/19.55462/110.82299
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse (2022-04-16 09:19:00+00:00): Here you have used "Statistics Canada Road Network File (RNF)" as a source.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada#Importing_government_data suggests "Statistics Canada data is used to import street names where they are missing from the other data sets. It is advised to not copy the geometry; however, you can use the street names database as a reference. "
I suggest that you discuss exactly what you are doing in more detail at 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca .
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:08:55+00:00): upon further digging its entry was listed as permanently closed. That, and it's also no longer listed on the Harvey's website either. The same is also true of Swiss Chalet.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:09:30+00:00): That restaurant was done ages ago … I believe a year before covid it was listed for sale. Honestly that one should have been the Tims that’s across the street IMO. I am sad that the Starbucks closed down farther up Corydon
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:09:50+00:00): I think they're closing any lease they can possibly get out of (except flagship location type things). Probably assuming that most landlords will be happy to have them back post-pandemic.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:10:13+00:00): It's been listed for sale forever, and surprisingly cheap for a fairly big plot of commercial land right on Corydon.

It's also the reason I stopped ordering Swiss Chalet directly, because I'm in their delivery zone and nothing was ever made close to correctly, things were always missing, and the staff/managers were horrible to deal with. I don't think I'm stepping out on a limb in saying it was very much "family run" in the worst possible way.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:10:37+00:00): I remember it being a run down chicken chef(?) forever
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:11:08+00:00): However, specific to the building & lot: I will be there in a neon suit & mask to cheer on the demolition of that property. That intersection should not have drive thrus and the absence of streetscaping in the current design was a crime. That plot would do more for the neighbourhood as a gravel parking lot, and I hate parking lots.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:12:26+00:00): It clearly says it is closed
Takeout Hours
Closed
Show Hours
Day of the Week	Hours
Friday	Closed
Saturday	Closed
Sunday	Closed
Monday	Closed
Tuesday	Closed
Wednesday	Closed
Thursday	Closed
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:13:34+00:00): the Swiss Chalet at 946 Corydon Ave., along with Harvey's, permanently shut
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:14:04+00:00): !
THIS RESTAURANT IS PERMANENTLY CLOSED
!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:26:00+00:00): most of these stores were gone ten or more years ago
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:30:08+00:00): I am a local so please do not question anything because I have proof to back it as i have surveyed this area for many years
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:36:55+00:00): I will answer any concerns related to proof or sources, just please do not revert without prior reasoning
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:34:16+00:00): Peter Nygard, who in court filings says he is a consultant for the Nygard Group and sole owner of Nygard Enterprises Ltd., has been indicted on nine charges in the U.S. for allegations he sexually assaulted women and girls over a 25-year period in Canada, the U.S. and the Bahamas. 

Nygard remains in custody at the Headingley Correctional Centre awaiting extradition to the U.S. He will appear in bail court Jan 28. 

Nygard has consistently denied the allegations and says they are fabrications as part of a conspiracy to malign his reputation.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:34:50+00:00): Nygard properties for sale after court allows for liquidation of assets
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:35:05+00:00): For sale signs can be seen in front of several Nygard stores after Manitoba's Court of Queen's Bench approved the liquidation of a group of companies owned by Winnipeg fashion tycoon Peter Nygard.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:35:39+00:00): For sale signs can be seen in front of several Nygard stores in Winnipeg.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 17:06:09+00:00): I can confirm as I live within 10 minutes of this store, I pass by it every time I go on Kenaston.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:43:30+00:00): This is going to be a new urban indigenous reserve called Naawe Oodena and is expected to be completed by 2023.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:45:20+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&lat=49.849988091983&lng=-97.207467961379&z=17&pKey=1199768693827218&focus=photo, this shows the start of demolition
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 17:30:42+00:00): If you have any doubts, i will back up any fact or claim for you and will confirm it is indeed correct.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 17:25:02+00:00): sorry this is wrong, just fixed it to actual definition, brownfield
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 03:51:25+00:00): The Kapyong Barracks, or as it is now known as Naawe Oodena is now just brownfield and will update as soon as buildings start being built.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 17:23:25+00:00): Yes it is aboriginal land, but for right now it is under construction and brownfield, please do not revert and do not re-add nonexistent buildings, i will tag it as this place does not exist or is gone
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 17:24:12+00:00): The buildings that were there were gone for over a year so it makes sense to update observations.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 17:26:25+00:00): Construction crews were here as early as 2019, the demolition work started in early 2020 and was completed by October 2021, in this case the designation that is brownfield makes sense.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-16 17:27:11+00:00): I live 2 minutes away, so i can see it from my house and i know how it looks
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-17 22:25:56+00:00): I see these barracks everyday through my window and can confirm it is indeed brownfield
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-17 22:26:51+00:00): All that is visible now is of rubble and mud, this area is fenced off to the public due to construction
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-17 22:28:27+00:00): There are no buildings left, I have proof to back it up, see the dozens of local news sites, recent satellite imagery, radio, I can even take a picture if you need me to
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-17 22:29:33+00:00): There is no doubt that this area is brownfield, ask the locals in this area and they will confirm it is true
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-17 22:30:57+00:00): https://www.clc-sic.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Kapyong%2520Barracks%2520Master%2520Plan_EN_accessible-avec%2520compression.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwixgYf8kpz3AhXEB80KHeCFCpgQFnoECBMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2KW7wzN49GQtvKnd6qG63G

https://www.clc-sic.ca/real-estate/naawi-oodena&ved=2ahUKEwixgYf8kpz3AhXEB80KHeCFCpgQFnoECAcQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3o21Dc4rGUXJBDU9M4qr-m
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-17 22:32:55+00:00): https://www.clc-sic.ca/real-estate/naawi-oodena
https://www.clc-sic.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Kapyong%20Barracks%20Master%20Plan_EN_accessible-avec%20compression.pdf
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-17 22:33:43+00:00): If you have questions about the project, please contact us at inquiries@treaty1.ca.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ElliottPlack (2022-08-22 14:12:37+00:00): Hi bgo_eiu, this changeset was flagged due to the presence of an attribute typically associated with an import. What is the source of this fiber data?
Mark09 (2022-11-15 16:41:57+00:00): Somebloak,

I see that you were updating shelters on this military base (and as indicated by your comments).  Was the deletion of the military base boundary accidental or what is your reasoning?  If it was an accident, no problem, just please let me know and I can restore it from the history.  Thanks.
literan (2022-04-16 10:37:28+00:00): добавили парк внутри другого парка
mrbaja (2022-04-16 16:53:15+00:00): извините
SekeRob (2022-04-16 09:40:33+00:00): Hi marko,

Is that bus stop middle of a motorway bridge near Antalya for real? Difficult to get there, you'd have to climb the guardrails to get on the road side.

Greetings from Italy
ToniE (2022-04-16 11:06:04+00:00): Thanks marko for joining OSM and welcome.

Good to see people with local knowledge mapping details.

For the bus stops: "Bushaltestelle" should not be part of 'name' - "highway=bus_stop" is sufficient to classify this as a "Bushaltestelle".

The 'name' should just include only what is said on the bus stop sign (with abbreviations just being expanded: xxx-Str. -> xxx-Straße)

Have fun

Regards
Toni
user_5359 (2022-04-16 13:49:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice:religion=none and denomination=catholic is a contradictory information!
user_5359 (2022-04-16 05:11:34+00:00): Wrong description! correkt image -> wikimedia_commons; move key uploaded_by to description
tux67 (2022-04-19 14:57:36+00:00): Hi,
du hattest hier Review requested angeklickt. War es etwas Besonderes, das du reviewt haben wolltest?
Inzwischen hat auch ein anderer User den Kreisverkehr aktualisiert.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119771404
Bier (2022-04-19 17:30:35+00:00): War mir nicht ganz sicher ob das so richtig ist.
Aber sieht ja gut aus.
Um den Kreisverkehr fehlen noch Radwege. Komme aber nicht dazu, die zu tracken.

Auch war mir nicht ganz klar, warum 

Die Kreisstraße K19 als secondary gekennzeichnet ist. Aber wer lesen kann..🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

„in der Regel highway=tertiary, bei besonders wichtigen und gut ausgebauten Straßen auch highway=secondary -- Als Anhaltspunkt siehe Tagging samples (engl.)“

Beim nächsten mal ohne Review.

Liebe Grüße
Neuwessi11 (2022-04-21 16:30:51+00:00): Was die Radwege angeht: Irgendwann müsste es ja auch wieder ein aktuelleres Orthophoto geben ...
user_5359 (2022-05-31 08:11:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9669496256. What is the meaning of the tag 动物园 = 动物园?
marnen (2022-04-16 05:50:28+00:00): Marking this for myself: this is probably my largest changeset in bounding box.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:34:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
CoyKoi (2022-04-17 22:47:32+00:00): Hi Axel, thank you for your addition of the Wharariki Ecosanctuary. You have added two features to represent it (a centre-point, and a boundary polygon). This is discouraged by the principle of "one feature, one OSM element". I would suggest in this case keeping only the boundary polygon. Also perhaps leisure=nature_reserve is a more fitting tag for this feature. OSMWiki page on this principle: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119772775
Axel Wilke (2022-04-17 23:14:05+00:00): Thanks for that. The problem is that I don't really know what I'm doing. By the way, the boundary polygon is just an approximation. There is a pest exclusion fence but it's too new and not visible on the aerial yet. And there's a brand-new article on Wikipedia about the nature sanctuary (not written by me): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wharariki_Ecosanctuary
Axel Wilke (2022-04-17 23:24:23+00:00): Also, there is a hut within the reserve. I've highlighted it on this photo. Could you add that, please? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wharariki_Ecosanctuary_366.jpg
CoyKoi (2022-04-18 01:20:07+00:00): No worries, your initial edit was a fine start, and with the update it's now perfect :) Approximate boundary is also OK, though I will snap it to the coastline, and I'll add the hut. I like that annotation feature on the wikimedia picture, I hadn't seen that before!
Axel Wilke (2022-04-18 01:24:02+00:00): Well, I no my way around Commons and Wikipedia (where I'm an admin) much better than OSM. I did attend an online meeting on map making where it was explained to me that for Wikidata to show details from OSM, one has to define a link to Wikidata at OSM. Interesting concept. That's why I played around with the high rise in Auckland; I got it to work.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2022-04-22 22:37:44+00:00): hello, can you explain the change you made on this changeset? there's two gates
mcliquid (2022-04-23 07:43:46+00:00): Hi, I changed the global access tag to the motor vehicle access tag as you can see in the history of the participated ways. There are gates but there both were open for pedestrians on my last visit.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .