piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gosausee (2016-05-16 09:18:41+00:00): Wieso zeichnen Sie die Gebäude so ungenau ein?
MKnight (2016-05-16 12:59:46+00:00): http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=16&lat=49.43298&lon=7.50319&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTT&item=&level=1%252C2%252C3&tags=&fixable=
Blackbird27 (2016-05-27 07:34:36+00:00): Не потрібно малювати треки по уже створеній межі сільських рад/міст/областей і т.д., якби ви користувалися JOSM, то валідатор даних видав би вам помилку перед відправленням даних, тепер потрібно виправляти ваші треки, які дублюють інші лінії на карті.
Blackbird27 (2016-05-27 07:38:57+00:00): і якщо ви вказуєте в джерелах Local GPX, то бажано завантажити також цей трек на сервер OSM, наприклад для лінії 418061803, треку немає.
Kleben (2016-05-29 08:24:05+00:00): Отписал в личку
5m4u9 (2016-05-15 17:20:10+00:00): Oh my dog! Thank you for added!

a few hours of opening the new airport :).
scai (2016-05-17 17:45:29+00:00): Hallo detbrymel,

schön dass du hier zwei neue Wege eingetragen hast. Aber es ist noch notwendig ihnen Attribute zuzuweisen. Bisher sind es lediglich Linien ohne weitere Klassifizierung. Aber es handelt sich dabei doch bestimmt um Straßen, oder? Dafür müssten noch entsprechende Attribute aus den Vorlagen ausgewählt werden, damit letztendlich als Tags die Werte highway=service (entspricht einer Zufahrt) an den Wegen auftauchen. Machst du das noch?

Grüße
Alex
hadw (2016-08-14 13:08:34+00:00): This changeset is being discussed on http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=55463
RicoElectrico (2016-05-14 17:15:43+00:00): Zmieniłeś nazwę wsi na "Sąborze 24", więc wycofałem to.

Zdaje mi się, że maps.me obecnie nie umożliwia dodawania adresów, czy rzeczywiście doszedł w tym miejscu nowy adres? Mogę dodać, jeśli tak jest.
marczoutendijk (2016-05-16 11:34:24+00:00): Zie mijn welkomstmail over de wijzigingen die je hebt aangebracht. DIe kloppen nog niet of zijn overbodig. Het station staat toch al op de kaart?
AsgerFrank (2016-05-14 15:01:39+00:00): I almindelighed bør man ikke røre adressenoderne, heller ikke tilføje eller ændre tags; AWSbot håndterer dem.
Men du kan genoprette det ved at lave et nyt punkt (lidt forskudt, så man kan se der nu er to forskellige) og flytte dine tags derover. Man kan evt. også kopiere nogen(4) tags fra adressenoden over, men rationalet bag den praktik kender jeg ikke. 
Her er et eksempel hvor man har "genoprettet" en adressenode (i fortiden var muligvis normalt at skrive i adressenoderne):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/956893128/history
- og her er den nye node han har oprettet med navnetag osv.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3402665490
poornibadrinath (2016-06-01 07:38:57+00:00): Hi @charishma
Please change the changeset comment when you editing in another area. You are editing or adding buildings in Tumakuru which is in Karnataka and not Bhopal, Warangal, Guntur or Port Blair.
Best,
Poornima Badrinath
Kengaru (2017-02-24 12:34:51+00:00): адрес дома не верно же обозначен addr:housenumber 	46 (А,Б,В)
www.openstreetmap.org/way/170647446#map=19/44.58359/33.44835
Велькин Виктор (2017-02-25 13:02:38+00:00): Я не изменял адреса.
Gppes (2018-07-23 06:11:46+00:00): Hi,

Du hast hier bei Kammern auf Openstreetmap eine Almhuette und ein paar Details eingzeichnet. Ist das eine private Huette oder wird dort etwas ausgeschenkt oder kriegt man sogar eine Jause? Wenn es so ein kleiner Wirt ist, weisst Du den Namen?

Lg, Gppes
Achoin (2016-05-15 08:05:29+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы внесли исправления в карту openstreetmap с помощью приложения MAPS.ME.
Ошибка: 2. Использован тип POI достопримечательность для завода. 
2. Официальное название завода "35 СРЗ" см. http://www.35srz.ru/
Все ошибки исправил.
При редактировании карты пользуйтесь, пожалуйста, проверенной информацией.
Исправления должны появиться при следующем обновлении карты MAPS.ME.
Спасибо за участие.
MCalaOSM (2016-05-15 12:54:39+00:00): Ciao non ho capito cosa hai fatto qui. Tanti saluti
MCalaOSM (2016-05-15 12:55:36+00:00): Dati esistenti?
dgitto (2016-05-15 13:47:47+00:00): Niente di particolare. Un pezzo di strada era Umberto I e un pezzo era senza "I" e l'ho aggiunto
mueschel (2017-12-22 13:46:32+00:00): Hi,
I guess something went wrong here with the import of 35 airports. They use several strange tags, like 'ICAOKODE', 'ICAO_KODE' which should be 'icao', 'IATAKODE', 'IATA_KODE' which should be 'iata' and several more:
LUFTHAVNEIER
LUFTHAVNTYPE
ROTASJON
TRAFIKKTYPE

Would you mind changing this to standard tags?

Cheers, Jan
Reitstoen (2017-12-22 15:00:28+00:00): Hi!
Thanks for notifying me. I wasn't aware the import files had these nodes, since the import should only be about landcover.
I'll remove these nodes, or remove these tags if correct tags has since been added to the nodes.
- Ola Endre
Jan 64 Squares (2016-05-14 15:27:03+00:00): Sorry, war ein gemerkter Änderungskommentar von früher. Geschwindigkeit auf 50 km/h gesetzt.
nyampire (2016-05-16 07:58:00+00:00): こんにちは。

存在しないPOIや地物を編集しているように見受けられます。OpenStreetMapは、現実の世界を地図に記載する国際的なプロジェクトであり、世界的な協調が求められています。
あなたの行為は破壊行為にあたり、看過することはできません。

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E7%A0%B4%E5%A3%8A%E8%A1%8C%E7%82%BA

よって、編集された地物の削除を行います。
rene78 (2016-05-14 20:02:39+00:00): viewpoint??
AkuAnakTimur (2016-05-15 12:38:26+00:00): This happens several times across the peninsular and Singapore, if I'm not mistaken. Perhaps the lack of place=* tag and tourism=viewpoint happens to be place at the bottom of the "Select category" options in the app? IMHO it's quite not fair to blame new OSMers whom happened to contribute through the MAPS.ME app.
Lejun (2022-04-20 11:12:49+00:00): Hi, as I was reviewing data in this area I saw that you named waterways such as this one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416473950). Is there any source where that came from?
mapper999 (2022-04-20 20:34:01+00:00): Hi, 
these names were already there. I just split the way, the original way was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39990802/history
I have no idea where the names came from, only been to Strasbourg a few times for a visit.
Lejun (2022-04-21 03:36:04+00:00): I see, my bad! Thanks for your prompt answer, I’ll investigate that. As a non german speaker, I’m quite lost with all the name attributes in the area.
Davileci (2024-07-18 06:30:28+00:00): Carrer de Colón pertenece al 46004: https://www.correos.es/es/es/herramientas/codigos-postales/detalle?query=46004
eggie (2017-10-29 16:16:21+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Athalis (2016-05-14 17:36:57+00:00): Außerdem doppelte Hausnummern entfernt
BeKri (2016-05-14 17:58:25+00:00): Nur so als Frage,
war es wirklich beabsichtigt den Hochspannungsknoten vom Umspannplatz Elisabethplatz in die Neureuthstr 19 zu verlegen ? Ich denke, der ist verrutscht ...
marcoSt (2016-05-15 09:55:27+00:00): Oh, ja das kann schon möglich sein, das der Punkt mir verrutscht ist. Gestern hing bei mir andauernd das Programm beim Anzeichnen, so dass ich aus Versehen den falschen Knoten erwischt haben könnte. Ich werde es gleich verbessern
Sven50981103 (2025-03-04 17:10:06+00:00): Way 416469214, Version #2 
The weir is on the other side of the bridge, upstream
mapper999 (2025-03-09 14:10:42+00:00): Well, this was like almost 10 years ago. I can't remember what I did there.
Feel free to change it, if the position is not correct.
awdawd (2016-05-14 18:30:03+00:00): que es esta mamada?
Marych_ (2016-05-15 10:16:23+00:00): Зачем вы удаляете?
Эти линии и так отмечены как не сеществующие
abandoned 	yes
abandoned:railway 	tram
fixme 	не удалять требуется для википедии

Прошу вас, наносите новые данные
ff5722 (2016-05-14 18:46:34+00:00): JOSM told me the last changeset was uploaded already...
cronoser (2016-05-30 21:48:54+00:00): Hola, veo que estás comenzando con OpenStreetMap. Por favor ten cuidado con las pruebas que realizas al indicar puntos de interés ya que estos se quedan en OpenStreetMap. El cajero en medio del castillo lo elimino.
Un saludo
opendcc (2016-05-16 17:12:38+00:00): Hallo,

dfgdfg ist als Kommentar doch ein bischen nichtssagend, oder? Bitte hilf auch den anderen Mappern (mit passenden Kommentar), damit wir ein gute Karte hinbekommen. Danke.
Warin61 (2018-08-15 02:14:13+00:00): Hi,
I believe the symbol and reference used for the hiking relation come from the book Rother Wanderführer, Neuseeland. As these are not 'on the ground' I don't think they should not be used in OSM. 

It would be like using an English travel guide to detail Berlin with their notes.
juhanjuku (2018-08-15 14:29:17+00:00): Hi,
osmc:symbol is for rendering purposes:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osmc:symbol
This symbol must not be equal with physical markings on path. For that is tag symbol.
So I can't understand why it bothers you.
There are thousands of hiking routes around world which have no markings on ground. It doesn't mean that we cant' map them for hikers to follow.
Warin61 (2018-08-15 21:31:20+00:00): If I see a symbol on the map I expect to see the same symbol on the trail. 

From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osmc:symbol
"Finally, don't just add a osmc:symbol to a hiking route because it looks good on the map. osmc:symbol should always reflect the route symbol that is used as waymarker or on guideposts to give the direction. " 

Tracks that have no symbol can be rendered in other way - e.g. using the full name. This reflects at lest some of the track signs - they too use the full track name.
juhanjuku (2018-08-16 04:56:50+00:00): Why you deleted ascent and descent tags? I have written permission from publisher to use Rother Wanderführer data on OSM
Warin61 (2018-08-16 06:06:39+00:00): a) How am I supposed to know that from this changset comments/source or the tags on the relation? I am not a mind reader. 

b) Where in OSM is the permission shown? 
I have looked on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors and on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue.
Warin61 (2018-08-16 06:51:25+00:00): Take a look at https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=6215093  click on the elevation profile .. that shows 
Accumulated ascent: 695 m
Accumulated descent: 700 m

There will be some errors in there .. but might be better data than that book.
Warin61 (2018-08-16 22:58:57+00:00): There are 2 main issues raised here that are applicable to other change sets of yours.

Issue 1. Copyright.
A) The change set source does not state the guide book you are apparently using. And it is now too late to include it there. None of the features that  apparently use the guide book have any source statements linking to the guide book.
B) There does not appear within OSM to be a documented valid copyright acceptance of use within OSM. 

Corrective actions need to be made. I would think that first any copyright agreement needs to be documented in OSM. Secondly source tags need to be included with every feature to state where the information came from. 

Issue 2. Tag Use.
A number of tag appear to be misused to link to a particular guide book. So far as found in New Zealand these are the ref, description and osmc:symbol tags. 

Corrective actions also need to be made with the removal of these tags. If you feel the need to link to the guidebook then it needs to be done is some appropriate way. For example guidebook:publisher=title, section. What ever tag you decide on using, ensure it is compatible with any OSM existing documentation, if there is no OSM existing documentation then document it. 

Note: these are my personal thoughts on the matter … others may have different views!
Polarbear-repair (2018-08-17 00:51:04+00:00): Dear juhanjuku,
the Data Working Group became aware of this discussion. You say in comment #4 that you "have written permission from publisher to use Rother Wanderführer data on OSM.". This would be great news.

However, could you please _submit a copy of this permission_ to the Data Working Group, at <data@osmfoundation.org>, so we can check if it is compliant with OSM's license model. 

Whether to map such routes in OSM can than be discussed separately.
Mightygirl (2016-05-14 20:59:59+00:00): Why?
Vincent de Phily (2016-05-16 09:20:20+00:00): Not bad for a first edit :)

A couple of improvements you can make:
* amenity=parking_space is used for individual spaces inside a bigger amenity=parking
* You can refine the higway=service by adding service=parking_aisle
* The service roads should be connected to the main road somehow. I suspect one goes via the Orchard house's car park ?
* access=private is the most restrictive access type, it notably excludes excludes customers/staff. I guess that service road is at most access=customers, but you might as well leave it blank.
* bicycle/foot/horse/etc tags are only useful if they have a different value from what is implied by the highway type or declared by the access tag.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=service
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access
MarcoR (2016-05-15 13:22:22+00:00): Hi!
With this changeset you created some duplicate POIs in San Gimignano: Osteria del Carcere (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4185980990 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4162461889), Mangius (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4185980989, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4185980789 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4162461789)
Please remove the duplicates (I would have done it but I didn't knew which one to keep)
rskedgell (2018-10-24 15:10:12+00:00): Re fixme=* node - yes, most, if not all, of the Lee Valley VeloPark is fenced with ~1m high railings. I'll map them in the next week or two and then remove the node.
BladeTC (2016-05-14 21:14:20+00:00): Amigo, já estou atualizando as divisas pelos dados do IBGE enquanto adiciono os distritos usando a malha distrital e municipal.
Se fizermos o mesmo trabalho ao mesmo tempo vai gerar conflitos nas relações.
FvGordon (2016-05-15 21:28:55+00:00): Hi,
can you please fix the ref of postbox https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4186021732 .
fitzsimons (2016-05-15 21:37:58+00:00): done
RitterR (2016-06-18 20:44:30+00:00):  linia http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418154989
ma błędnie przypisaną wartość maxspeed.
Prośba o skorygowanie bo teraz jest 35 mph
ljb_nj (2016-05-20 00:12:24+00:00): That should say: "Because it does NOT have orange blazes or any signage"...
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-05-15 00:56:16+00:00): Hi, 
What are you trying to dowith this edit?
You seem to be deleting lots of ways and nodes and losing information about which junctions are roundabouts, their speed limits whether they have pavement, what the source was for this data.
Eugene13 (2016-05-15 22:30:39+00:00): hi,
my edits basically was geometrics. And maybe sometime I forget check for more details, maybe. But 97% changes was only with geometrics. Was few places where creator did something strange, all components for place was improperly. At this moment I did try change with removing. 
Why I did this changes? Because I think / seen many people can't use properly this app,  I mean technical posibilities for drawing.
 If some data was lost, just revert my edit for this place, please, if you can.
Cheers
Gino-52 (2016-06-23 13:55:59+00:00): Wahrscheinlich war es ein Bedienungsfehler in Map-Me.
Aber auf dem Spielplatz steht kein Geldautomat.
Hab's wieder gelöscht.
letihu (2016-05-26 12:04:25+00:00): Es wäre schön, wenn nicht hunderte von Punkten übereinander liegen und nicht verbunden sind.
Z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4186121095/history mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1016005505/history
rza31 (2016-08-15 08:01:14+00:00): Hallo 5R-MFT,

das richtige Format für check date ist: check_date=YYYY-MM-DD. 

siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date

rza31
SomeoneElse (2016-05-15 09:30:47+00:00): Hi,
What you have mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418167714 is definitely a roundabout.  Can you explain why you have made it not one?
SomeoneElse (2016-05-15 23:27:30+00:00): One more thing - the bus route that runs across it has been broken.  Have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2268023#map=18/53.96781/-1.06311 and you'll see that there's a gap.
mueschel (2016-05-16 13:47:47+00:00): Hi,
on 11 nodes you added keys like adDoctor:postcode. Could you explain what this means? Should it be addr:postcode?

Cheers, Jan
highflyer74 (2016-05-16 14:56:22+00:00): @Jan: Ooops, did not see the comment in time and changed it to what it most probably is... If not, we have to change it back. Oliver (mal wieder ;-))
Rodrigo Rega (2016-05-15 02:24:31+00:00): ¿Na placa física aparece como "Rúa Armanyá" ou como "Rúa Armañá?
Loubám (2016-05-15 15:15:16+00:00): Ola Rodrigo
Na placa física aparece Armanyá, velaí tes unha foto de hai un cachiño
https://my.owndrive.com/index.php/s/rcQXIYedceBQE3s
Do que si teño moitas dúbidas é de que exista a "praza" Armanyá. A propia Subdelegación do Goberno ten como enderezo oficial a Rúa Armanyá, 10.
Rodrigo Rega (2016-05-15 15:53:03+00:00): O tema da praza haberá miralo mais a fondo entón. Abrirei unha nota para que non quede no olvido.

Gracias pola foto.
Rodrigo Rega (2016-05-15 15:57:02+00:00): Creei a nota: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/566181

Un saúdo.
Rodrigo Rega (2017-10-15 20:18:47+00:00): Nomes da praza e da rúa correxidos no conxunto de cambios #52964843 [1]
[1] https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=52964843

Un saúdo.
BladeTC (2016-05-16 23:59:27+00:00): Porquê Você apagou as Ruas??????????????
pratikyadav (2016-05-18 06:06:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413206322/history
You removed the oneway tag from this way. But seems like oneway is needed based on nearby highways.
highflyer74 (2016-05-16 13:29:02+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

All the best,

highflyer74
Warin61 (2016-08-22 10:14:12+00:00): Hi,
I have changed the 'basketball' courts to netball ... e.g. way 418200418. That is what they appear to be in LPI Imagery.
Supaplex (2016-06-05 16:44:58+00:00): 恭喜您透過Maps.Me，完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-06-05 16:46:02+00:00): 要特別注意在Maps.Me動到修改的部分都會上傳到開放街圖資料庫，因此記得非公共性資訊，如私人住家資訊不宜標示
Supaplex (2016-06-05 16:48:04+00:00): 我已經修改了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39820250
記得非公共性的資訊別上傳上來
5m4u9 (2016-05-15 20:14:25+00:00): por favor, tener cuidado y no crear nodos ni desplazar líneas de límites o fronteras, es muy dificil volver a dejar como estaban... 

https://imgur.com/ekX9DX6
Supaplex (2016-05-15 09:23:41+00:00): 那個，距離、步行應該寫在其他欄位，而且每人的步行速度也不同
愛台玩 (2016-05-15 16:00:25+00:00): 是新北市府列管登山路線的标题
嘗試标示看台湾山友利用与体驗用
MMN-o (2016-05-15 11:06:55+00:00): Hej! Är du säker på att du justerat till korrekt läge på kartan?

Det ser ut som att du har flyttat till "standardpositionen" för Bing-kartorna. Dessa kan vara felaktigt justerade! Lita inte på dem blint.

Det bästa sättet att alignera saker på kartan är att använda sig av GPX-spåren. Om du redigerar i iD (webbläsaren, vilket du verkar göra) så kan du aktivera dessa genom "Background settings (B)" => "OpenStreetMap GPS Traces". Titta då t.ex. längs cykelvägar och annat.

Flygbilder blir ju per automatik skeva om de tas över en stor yta, pga det som är direkt under flygplanet verkar större än det som är i vinkel längre bort etc.


Kul att du börjat kartlägga dock! :)
user_5359 (2016-05-15 08:23:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
scai (2016-05-17 17:34:07+00:00): Hallo detbrymel,

Was soll denn dieser Weg hier darstellen, den du angelegt hast? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418245950

Grüße
Alex
AMDmi3 (2016-05-23 18:51:07+00:00): Заполняйте, пожалуйста, названия улиц в соответствии с http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
Лёха (2016-05-24 18:27:14+00:00): Короче говоря, "улица" пишется с маленькой буквы и идёт перед названием самой улицы?
AMDmi3 (2016-05-24 20:43:38+00:00): Не совсем. "улица Ленина", но "Ленинская улица"
Лёха (2016-05-25 13:42:14+00:00): Да, согласен. Спасибо за поправки! В будущем тоже указывай на ошибки.
Teiron (2016-05-15 08:36:13+00:00): zły opis sorki
aseerel4c26 (2016-05-16 15:06:58+00:00): Mit Änderungssatz 39354758 habe ich die Änderungssätze 39336542 39336518 39327617 39327456 39327161 39327094 (dieser) revertiert, da die  Bearbeitung der realen Änderung ungünstig (Wegdopplungen, Löschungen wo es nur umgetaggt werden sollte, ...) erfolgt ist. Die Fakten stelle ich in Kürze wieder her.
aseerel4c26 (2016-05-16 15:08:49+00:00): Kontaktaufnahme per Mail am 15 May 2016 at 11:48  war leider erfolglos.
aseerel4c26 (2016-05-16 17:01:59+00:00): Mit Änderunsgssatz 39357688 NSG bei Luderbach verbessert wieder eingefügt, Wege gesperrt und entspr. des realen Zustandes und Nutzung umgetaggt statt gelöscht.
RoedeOrm (2016-05-22 21:12:37+00:00): Die Wege habe ich gelöscht, weil dort laut Zusatzbeschilderung ein absolutes Betretungsverbot besteht. Und die Wege aufgegeben und zum Teil bereits unwegbar gemacht wurden.
aseerel4c26 (2016-05-22 22:14:56+00:00): Ja, danke, passt jetzt ja. Löschen war etwas viel des Guten - ich habe es geändert. Mehr per Mail.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-05-17 10:04:39+00:00): Hey @Multi Pass, some lonely nodes left on OSM when you were simplifying the national park, can you take some time to clean all these lonely nodes.
Multi Pass (2016-05-17 10:46:39+00:00): Thanks for pointing them out. I will take care of it.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-05-18 06:30:20+00:00): Great!! : )
letihu (2017-01-09 20:54:40+00:00): Dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418265353/history
führt direkt durch diesen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418265354/history
Gebäude. Irgendwas ist falsch hier.
jengelh (2017-01-09 21:27:30+00:00): Was soll daran falsch sein? Der Weg ist korrekt als abandoned markiert, seit sich da der Grundstückseigentümer entschieden hat, ein Haus auf den Trampelpfad zu setzen.
letihu (2017-01-10 14:24:55+00:00): Ok, jetzt sehe ich es auch ;-)
Sollten denn solche Altlasten in der Karte bleiben? Hier ist das ja noch sinnvoll, weil das Haus nicht im Luftbild ist. Aber ich hab schon andere Sachen in der Karte gesehen, die es schon nicht mehr gab als OSM entstanden ist.
jengelh (2017-01-10 15:01:31+00:00): Fallspezifisch. Es gibt z.B. historisch interessante erhaltenswerte Dinge, z.B. die Segmente der Gartetalbahn, dem Paradiesweg beim Amtsgericht.
Da die Datenfülle bei OSM kein Problem darstellt (siehe auch https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2009-November/058053.html für einen lustigen Beitrag), kann man im Prinzip alles drin lassen was drin ist, insbesondere solche Objekte, deren erste Version in der OSM-Historie bereits ein "abandoned"/"removed" trugen.
user_5359 (2016-05-15 14:00:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice your add:street info is a add:full (combination on housenumber, zip code etc). Please double check the correctness of your information, too! I didn't found a street nearby with these name.
emergency99 (2016-05-15 22:11:37+00:00): What kind if bus stop should this be? All bus lines in Vienna are mapped properly. There are also no stations called something with Maschine ... I will delete this node, and hope, that the castle in soprom is actually real...
boriskaa ru (2016-05-17 11:15:24+00:00): Hi. Both of them are actually private nods. How can i save them in Maps.me without being posted openly?