piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dynamikum (2019-05-06 18:50:12+00:00): Willkommen bei osm. 

Bei Gewerbe ist building=yes die gute Wahl. house wird für Einfamilienhaus genommen.

Lies hier nach https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building

Zusammengebaute Gebäude teilen die Knoten, das ist dir hier nicht immer gelungen.

Schöner Gruß 

D
Sowa1980 (2019-10-03 16:55:40+00:00): Привет, ты доигрался буду настаивать что бы тебя заблокировали , за удаление существующих дорог и объектов и твоего вандализма, Я так понимаю это уже специально делается хорошо путь тебе в DWG прямой.
Sowa1980 (2019-10-03 17:41:34+00:00): Пиши больше ложных комментарий как ты это делаешь, к пакетам правок проще , проще будет откатить. Сегодня буду просматривать все твои правки по Тамбовской области по каждой уйдет замечание в DWG. по твоему вандилизму.
literan (2019-08-13 07:12:51+00:00): не  совсем понимаю, почему вы убрали тег toll=yes (это платный участок).

И второе - там поставили знаки "Дорога для автомобилей" (motorroad=yes)?
cucullus (2019-08-14 16:48:48+00:00): Деньги собирают на пункте оплаты на уровне пл.140 км.
Вики гласит (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:toll): "Only portions of way from which there is no "escape" except for a U-turn should be marked as toll. A toll authority may maintain sections of road that are free to drive on, but charge a toll to pass a certain point. In that case, only the area around said point should be marked as toll."
Это как раз наш случай. До пункта оплаты много бесплатных съездов, перед кассой разворот. Если пометить длинный участок перед кассой платным, то по факту бесплатный маршрут на съезд будет показан платным.

Что касается motorroad. Там автомагистраль. Насколько я помню, я ставил motorroad прочитав вики и приводя разные участки к одному виду. Впрочем, я не настаиваю и Вы можете это поправить, если считаете необходимым.
literan (2019-08-14 20:54:14+00:00): насчет платки я вас понял. Да, вы правы, тут есть съезд.

Что касается автомагистрали - нет, там нет зеленых знаков автомагистрали. И знаков "Дорога для автомобилей" я там не видел. Это обычная дорога с разделительной полосой и развязками, категории 1Б. В этой части я вашу правку откачу.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-07 22:27:20+00:00): also fix this name, this is not the name of the bus stop for sure.
Reza_koulivand (2019-05-17 12:00:39+00:00): بی فرهنگ بازی در نیار،هرچی حذف کنی من ثبت میکنم
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:44:46+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
user_5359 (2019-05-07 17:37:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Reza_koulivand (2019-05-17 09:08:24+00:00): "چرا موبایل میلاد" را حذف کردید؟؟
ElliottPlack (2019-05-08 05:42:59+00:00): Reverted this. Second time. That Sollers Point Road property is NOT a park. It is an unnamed recreation_ground. Recreation grounds by definition can be on school property but are not parks. The word "recreation" is also in the Department of Recreation & Parks' name. They administer both items. Just being a joint BoE and RnP site does not make something a park.
walloHerbrechtingen (2019-08-07 11:40:00+00:00): Meine Suche in osm.org mit "MHP Arena" ging fehl. Jetzt sehe ich, dass die Schreibweise in einem Wort ist. Das ist ungwöhnlich. Bitte als alt_name noch einfügen: "MHP Arena"
DSanke
MaestroGlanz (2019-08-07 18:19:50+00:00): Die offizielle Schreibweise ist so wie hier, aber alt_name hinzugefügt. Sollte jetzt passen.
Sowa1980 (2019-10-07 20:20:40+00:00): По чему удаляются существующие ручьи и реки, Поясни свои Вандальные действия.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/347742885
Жду комментария. к каждому моему сообщения. Потом пусть DWG разбирается с твоим вандализмом.
DemoLogin (2020-01-21 16:07:54+00:00): Invalid name
eggie (2019-05-06 21:15:28+00:00): Dag mxosm.. footway=sidewalk hoeft niet op highway=footway.. het is een soort BUG in editor iD.. 
MVG,
Eggie
mxosm (2019-05-07 14:35:04+00:00): Bedankt, goed om te weten. Ik heb het aangepast.

Groet,
mxosm
Hostal Robert & Richard (2023-11-15 19:00:48+00:00): Este lugar ha cambiado de nombre, actualmente se llama Hostal Robert & Richard
ma-rt-in (2019-05-06 20:38:21+00:00): Hallo,
bitte sag mir doch was bei Way 645338244 gilt: vehicle oder motor_vehicle? ^^
Node 6327460228: komma mal durch semikolon ersetzten.
vg
Map-Peter (2019-05-08 19:05:13+00:00): Hallo ma-rt-in, 
danke für den Hinweis. 
Ich habe es gerade entsprechend angepasst. 
Gruß Peter
iWowik (2019-05-09 02:06:50+00:00): 1) В чем ошибка? Есть же соглашение о наименовании. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
2) Менять названия на highway, не меняя addr:street еще большая ошибка.
iWowik (2019-05-09 02:16:59+00:00): Второй пункт снимаю.
Поднял тему на форуме
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=748149#p748149
dair (2019-05-09 06:17:27+00:00): Вижу уже сам разобрался. Да, это прилагательное, оно отличается при склонении: "Большой Зелениной улице". Так же неправильно были нормализованы и другие подобные улицы, например Гусева улица на Охте. Список таких улиц есть в Реестре: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/8424731 , раздел 1.2.1.2. Кстати, предыдущий бот-нормализатор с ними вроде справлялся.
dair (2019-05-09 06:30:02+00:00): Интересно, что Глухая Зеленина улица не стала жертвой нормализации, только Малая и Большая.
Hjart (2019-05-06 19:29:46+00:00): Forsøg gerne at undgå at splitte veje medmindre det virkelig er nødvendigt. Jeg har lige måttet bruge nogle sjove tricks for at få styr på bl.a. Højene igen.
Klaus Bek (2019-05-06 19:36:52+00:00): Undskyld, troede at jeg havde gjort det rigtigt. Det var den ikke længere eksisterende y-vej i sydøsthjørnet som drillede. Troede jeg havde forbundet alt igen. Kunne da godt bruge et udvidet kursus. Er ikke helt klar på, hvordan alt vist er forbundet.
Hjart (2019-05-06 20:16:48+00:00): Det er helt iorden (så længe du er nybegynder :-)
Sagen er at jeg gerne så vidt muligt vil bevare historikken på objeḱter af en vis betydning (i dette tilfælde Højene).
De forskellige arealer her overlapper hinanden, så jeg kan sådan set godt forstå det kan være lidt tricky at få fat på kun et bestemt objekt.
Bemærk at under "Kortobjekter" ikonen til højre i editoren (nederst) kan du ved at klikke på "Arealanvendelse" skjule arealer og derved lettere få fat på veje mm.
Klaus Bek (2019-05-06 20:24:38+00:00): Det må jeg prøve i morgen. Har også en udfordring med hele området Lysbro Mose, der er større endnu.
dieterdreist (2019-05-16 09:52:20+00:00): This looks like an undiscussed mechanical edit. All kind of buildings have been "squared", also T-shaped and L-shaped buildings which are currently represented by 4-corner-polygons. Or buildings with a lot of protruding geometries: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589638244
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69948294
LeifRasmussen (2019-05-16 12:41:49+00:00): "squared" is probably the wrong word for this - iD let's users "square" buildings by taking almost 90° angles and making them 90°.  Complex shapes aren't just turned into 4 nodes squares.  If a T shaped building is now a square shape, it's because it wasn't T shaped to begin with, and the contributor simply didn't notice that.
dieterdreist (2019-05-16 12:49:58+00:00): I didn't write T-shaped buildings were now squared, what I meant was that a rectangle with perfect 90° angles is generally not a better representation for a T, an L or any other polygonal shape than the approximate building outlines that have been there before, arguably some will be worst afterwards.
My comment stands, this is an undiscussed automated edit and violating the guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
dieterdreist (2019-05-16 13:02:02+00:00): I also believe the "squaring" creates another kind of problems:
1. by using a threshold for squaring, those buildings that haven't been squared are now standing out and it may look as if they are actually like this (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589667129 ),
2. By squaring each building individually, the angles between 2 adjacent buildings often get worse compared to before and the flight of buildings with respect to the street (typically parallel in many areas of the world) as well.
bhousel (2019-05-16 13:23:52+00:00): Hi dieterdriest - it is not an undiscussed mechanical edit.  I visually reviewed all the buildings while scrolling around in iD and used the new square building validator to fix them.

Squaring multiple items is a capability that JOSM users have enjoyed for a long time, so it's great that iD will be able to do it now too.  (You would probably be surprised how big a deal this is for some people, but we get a lot of requests for this feature).

Thanks for reviewing my changeset, and have a super day.
dieterdreist (2019-05-16 15:37:28+00:00): Hello bhousel, thank you for replying, and yes, I completely agree that squaring is also in Josm a feature that has the exact same problems (btw, not the building mode, where you can select a road or 2 nodes and the new elements will be aligned to it - overrule with shift).
A super day for you as well.
aixbrick (2019-05-07 16:23:48+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
aus dem ursprünglichen Gebäude hast du zwei einzelne gemacht. Das ist suboptimal, weil es sich, soweit ich weiß, um ein zusammenhängendes Gebäude handelt und auch der linke Bereich nur ein Teil (building:part) des Gesamtkomplexes ist. Der rechte Bereich ist zudem nun ein Multipolygon (das hat aber wahrscheinlich der Editor erstellt und ist keine bewusste Aktion von dir gewesen).
Du hast außerdem Fußwege mit den Gebäudeumrissen zusammengelegt. Bitte ändern und voneinander trennen. Zum Einen entspricht das nicht der Realität, zum Anderen kann das zu Problemen beim späteren Editieren führen.
Gruß
aachso (2019-05-07 17:22:40+00:00): Danke für deinen Hinweis! Ich werde das gleich anpassen. 

Warum ich das gemacht habe, habe ich schon im Forum erläutert (mit ähnlichem Feedback wie deinem: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=747853)

Kannst du mir (vielleicht auch im Forum) einen Tipp geben, wie ich die beiden Ämter am besten den entsprechenden Gebäudeteilen/Eingängen zuordnen kann?

Merci
aixbrick (2019-05-08 09:31:59+00:00): Ups, übersehen. Ich habe nun dort geantwortet.
datendelphin (2019-05-07 20:09:22+00:00): it looks like you connected the albis tunnel with the track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2904260925
rbuffat (2019-05-08 12:10:12+00:00): @datendelphin thank's for spotting this. This path would indeed be a bad alternative route for trains! fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70023773
michalfabik (2019-05-06 20:29:18+00:00): Pozdrav,
hvala na unosu! Probaj pritisnuti 's' (kao square) kako bi napravio pravougaonu kuću.
Lijep pozdrav,
Michal
VictorIE (2019-05-11 21:32:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688222887

Multiple instances of barr=hed - should these be barrier=hedge ?
Dafo43 (2019-05-12 20:33:43+00:00): Thanks, think I fixed them all now. Yes, they were meant to be hedges.
Sowa1980 (2019-10-07 20:23:42+00:00): По чему удаляются существующие ручьи и реки, Поясни свои Вандальные действия.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/347742885
Жду комментария. к каждому моему сообщения. Потом пусть DWG разбирается с твоим вандализмом.
Volker Fröhlich (2020-01-26 16:08:58+00:00): Hallo, Du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6452962881 eingezeichnet. Ich war dort heute und dort ist nix. Auch das Luftbild von basemap.at von 2018 schaut nicht danach aus.
ma-rt-in (2020-03-29 00:12:59+00:00): Hallo,
bitte überprüfe doch ein von die eingetrane Beschränkungen nach folgendem Wiki Eintrag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

vg
SomeoneElse (2019-05-11 10:04:38+00:00): Hi Steve,
Is there any more information about "SCCGIS Zoning.zip v5" anywhere?  I can see a reference to it at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Santa_Cruz_County,_California , but nothing about what it actually is, what the licence is, that sort of thing.
Best Regards,
Andy
stevea (2019-05-16 19:01:35+00:00): As described at https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Contributors#California, no license is needed.  It is illegal in California to place a license on "public record" data.  Therefore the data are freely available to OSM and always have been.

"What they are" are described and linked to at the county /Archive page.  They were (in 2009) a poorly-uploaded dataset which over many years were improved to be a corrected and updated version of those data.  They continue to be updated and corrected even today, as the data have both updated and been corrupted by other contributors (inadvertently "smeared" by several meters, truncated or fouled because of joined nodes while dragged, etc.).  Where and as superior data are known and uploaded, either the tags showing SCCGIS as source data are deleted, the older data are replaced or both.

The wikis (including the Landuse Archive) make it clear that these data are in no way meant to preclude the upload of superior data, and in fact in many cases this is exactly what is happening, and older, inferior data "fall away" as they are replaced by better data.  This is identical to how TIGER data for roads and rail get replaced by superior data all across the USA.

However, the wiki also states "Wholesale removal of the SCCGIS data without such improvement is regressive to OSM's overall data content, so contributors are encouraged to UPDATE, ADD and IMPROVE data here, where as superior data supersede SCCGIS data, the older data can be removed."
ID`s (2019-05-07 05:10:22+00:00): building=yes на территории, а не рукотворном сооружении.
gurglypipe (2019-05-07 08:38:20+00:00): Hi, your change of Pikestol Lane to Pikestone Lane caused some OSLMC validation errors:
 - https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=589481
 - https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=589482

Would you be able to double check this? My guess is that Pikestone Lane is the correct name, and OSLMC is wrong, but I don’t know what you saw on the ground. The not:name tag is the right way to silence these warnings if they are incorrect.

Ta!
phodgkin (2019-05-07 18:10:21+00:00): My bad. Fixing route breaks and validation problems. Hadn't looked carefully enough on OS StreetView and missed that Pikestone Lane does change mysteriously to Pikestol Lane. Agree this is probably wrong, but have undone change pending on-the-ground survey.
ika-chan! (2019-06-18 13:50:31+00:00): I think it is a bit too early to call Free and Real a village right now, even though it is clearly nothing like Scientology.

I think it is more of a large-scale eco-focused community project at this time.
sheldonelectric (2019-06-18 19:45:33+00:00): I couldn't find any better tag, but I guess community center is ok too.
Thanks for fixing this.
viloan (2019-05-06 20:02:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BCNorwich (2019-05-07 06:24:42+00:00): Hi, a width tag on a highway needs to be a number in metres, narrow is a description not a statement of width.

I've moved the park boundary off of the highway centre line.

Regards Bernard.
philippec (2022-06-02 18:30:06+00:00): Baarle Hertog Cultureel Centrum AED.
De AED hangt (nu) buiten.
De mapillary is op komst.
Mocht er toch ééntje ook binnen zijn, geef dan de location.
Supaplex (2019-08-09 15:54:28+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-08-09 16:17:22+00:00): 請問為何要在日月潭湖面上加上人行道?
StephaneP (2019-05-08 13:24:44+00:00): Rhooo, t'étais à 6km de la maison !!
vincent_95 (2019-05-08 17:30:06+00:00): Presque ! :D
C'était du pur armchair mapping de chez moi, avec de micro corrections d'orthographe ou de casse,  via maps.me ;)
StephaneP (2019-05-09 12:11:27+00:00): Avec maps.me ? étonnant !
BeKri (2019-05-07 13:30:06+00:00): Servus,
Rossmann auch ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1309258632/history
Oder war das ein Versehen ?
Gruss derBeKri
hearp (2019-05-07 13:46:28+00:00): Das Gebäude wird abgerissen. Rossmann war der Letzte und hat am 27.4. geschlossen. Das neue Gebäude soll 2021 eingeweiht werden. Mal sehen, wer so einzieht.
BeKri (2019-05-07 16:00:57+00:00): Alles klar,  Danke !
ToniE (2019-05-07 08:14:58+00:00): Hallo Uwe,

... kennst du schon?

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/RP/DE-RP-VRM-Analysis.html

Ein paar Buslinien habe ich nördlich Neuwied/Rhein eingetragen ...

Viele Grüße
Toni
SomeoneElse (2019-05-06 22:07:58+00:00): No, per https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2734 , please provide evidence now.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:17:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:17:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
Carnildo (2019-05-07 06:53:56+00:00): Where did you get the name "Riverside" from?
Howpper (2019-05-11 19:17:15+00:00): Sorry for the late reply. There are literally signs outside the locale. https://www.google.com/maps/@47.9643405,-117.3495128,3a,75y,31.12h,79.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1spKBHPWAQgbTtW5InKDPYnQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Carnildo (2019-05-12 20:00:49+00:00): Thanks.
Bonix-Mapper (2019-09-04 20:25:02+00:00): Datinho,

Você precisa urgentemente entrar no grupo do telegram para conversar com a comunidade de mapeadores.

Encontrei várias alterações suas que considero questionáveis.

Por favor, entre para os grupos e veja como podemos nos ajudar nesta atividade de mapeamento.

1- https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade
2 - https://t.me/osmsp

Até mais.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:16:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:16:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:16:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
eggie (2019-05-07 05:50:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Probeer als het even kan op de juiste adresnode bij te taggen..

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-07 06:05:39+00:00): info samengevoegd met adresnode
eggie (2019-05-07 06:13:24+00:00): shop= garden_furniture toegevoegd. Dan rendert straks ook de naam.
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:16:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-06 22:16:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69953267 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peaks.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2834 etc..