piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
szydzio (2018-06-05 09:40:56+00:00): Hej Piwek!Jak to jest z tą zmiana nazwy ulicy na Podgórną?Czy jest już ostateczna?Nie odnajduję takiej decyzji w Dziennik Urzędowy
Województwa Lubuskiego. iMPA Krosna Odrzańskiego jak i TERYT dalej podaje nadal nazwę „Aleja Solidarności Krośnieńskiej” i takie też pozostawione są punkty adresowe co powoduje mrówki=> http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy/#17/52.05313/15.09577
Piwek (2018-06-05 10:14:59+00:00): http://dzienniki.luw.pl/#/legalact/2018/1275/
Masz rację w terycie jeszcze nie ma zmiany
szydzio (2018-06-05 10:48:12+00:00): No to nie wiem czy w takiej sytuacji nie byłoby sensowniej powrócić jednak póki co do name=”Aleja Solidarności Krośnieńskiej”.Teraz po wpisaniu do Nominativa 
Krosno Odrzańskie, Aleja Solidarności Krośnieńskiej 3 wypluwa „No results found”, po wpisaniu Krosno Odrzańskie Podgórna 3 znajduje co prawda taki adres ale już po kliknięciu w niego podaje „Aleja Solidarności Krośnieńskiej 3”. Jest bałagan trochę …
Piwek (2018-06-05 14:22:26+00:00): poczekajmy 2 dni powinno wskoczyć w teryt
mavl (2019-07-21 06:40:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:48:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Филиппок (2018-12-26 16:17:24+00:00): Я в википедии подсмотрел , но там значительно меньше живёт , наверно в Бурундай уехали.
Nmxosm (2018-10-21 09:44:41+00:00): Bitte formatiere Telefonnummern entsprechend dem Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone)

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2018-10-26 16:55:38+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
gabro00 (2018-05-30 11:58:56+00:00): Szép munka. A GTFS-el majd akkor jelentkezem valamikor, lehet csak a nyáron, majd meglátom hogy érek rá.
PT-53 (2018-05-31 08:51:14+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
Du hast an diesem Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1672617353#map=18/48.02262/9.25771 das Attribut Sperrung=Sperrung eingetragen. Einen Schlüssel "Sperrung" und den Wert "Sperrung" gibt es nicht.
Meinst Du eine Barriere (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier) oder ist da eine Sperrung per Verkehrsschild ?
(Verkehrszeichentool: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ - Verkehrszeichen anklicken, Nr.  notieren).

Welche Art von Sperrung gibt es dort und wie lange dauert die Sperrung ?
.
Bitte Antwort als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Danke.
.
Grüße
PT-53 (2018-05-31 08:55:54+00:00): PS:
Dein Änderungssatz-Kommentar Tempolit stimmt nicht mit der vorgenommenen Ergänzung überein. Bitte korrekte und aussagekräftige Änderungssatz-Kommentare verwenden  (was wurde wo gemacht - Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_.C3.84nderungssatz-Kommentare) und die Quelle für die Daten / Änderungen angeben. 
Hast Du entspr. Ortskenntnisse ?
Danke.
VeesFa (2018-06-05 17:15:25+00:00): Die Verbindung wie nun geändert richtig. Landwirtschaftlicher weg. Laut Beschilderung.
PT-53 (2018-06-05 18:09:31+00:00): Da steht eine Verkehrsschild Nr. 260 mit Zusatzzeichen 1026-38 (http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=260,1026-38), was ich heute auch so eingegeben habe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592641317/history

Meine Frage nach Ortskenntnisse hast Du noch nicht beantwortet.
Woher hast Du Deine "Kenntnisse" ?
mavl (2018-12-25 00:31:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
R0bst3r (2018-06-04 08:04:13+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ist dieser Ortsweg wirklich mit einem Schild mit einer Begrenzung für 10km/h versehen? Falls ja, warum nicht auf ganzer Länge? Falls nein, bitte nur eintragen, was vor Ort geregelt ist. Danke!
Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59394128
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
R0bst3r (2018-06-04 08:09:49+00:00): Hallo VesFa,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* Kreisverkehre haben in der Regel keine Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen durch Schilder (wenn dann implizit). Ist hier wirklich 10km/h vorgschrieben? Angrenzende Straßen haben wohl 50 km/h erlaubt? Bitte nur erfassen, was vor Ort geregelt!
Zur Einführung empfehle ich den Beginners' guide auf wiki.osm.org. Dort findet man auch Anleitungen zu allen Themen. Ansonsten wird einem unter forum.osm.org gerne geholfen.
Viel Erfolg noch und nicht entmutigen lassen!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59394265
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
R0bst3r (2018-06-04 08:19:13+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* Wi bereits erwähnt, bitte nur maxpseed erfassen, wenn vor Ort ein Schild etc darauf hinweist. Empfohlene Geschwindigkeiten könnten ggf. mit maxspeed:practical erfasst werden.
* Du hast hier in diesem Änderungssatz einen Baum um gut 100m nach Norden auf einen Parkplatz verschoben. Bitte besser aufpassen, da deine Änderungen direkt in der öffentlichen Datenbank gespeichert werden!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59394408
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
R0bst3r (2018-06-04 08:21:30+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* warum ist auf diesem Stück derOrtsstraße 20km/h und davor/danach 30 km/h? Ist dies so gewollt?
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59394426
PT-53 (2018-05-30 13:04:44+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
in diesem Änderungssatz hast Du diesen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24366167/history von residential auf service heruntergestuft und maxspeed=10 eingetragen. Gleichzeitig hast Du motor_vehicle=no gesetzt. Wie paßt das zusammen ?

Außerdem hast Du an diesen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5651515498 name=Poller eingetragen.
Ein Poller wird mit barrier=bollard markiert (Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard) und hat normalerweise keinen Namen. Außerdem sollten an einer Barriere noch die entspr. Access-Werte gesetzt werden (Access: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access). Ebenso an dem Wegstück hinter der Barriere, insbesondere wenn ein Weg durch 2 Barriere von beiden Seiten abgesperrt wird.
Bitte beachte auch, daß das entspr. Wegstück noch aufgeteilt werden muß.
.
Bei Fragen bitte neuen Kommentar erstellen.
Grüße
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
OF0 (2018-06-02 11:26:26+00:00): Pokemonedit?
PT-53 (2018-06-10 18:04:05+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,

ich war heute mit dem Rad in SIG und habe  verschiedene Änderungen von Dir überprüft. Leider mußte ich dabei feststellen, daß Deine maxspeed-Eingaben alle falsch waren. So gibt es auf der Burgstraße und der Straße In den Burgwiesen keine Höchstgeschwindigkeit-Verkehrsschilder. Somit gilt dort die Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 50 kmh innerhalb von Ortschaften.

War das ein Versehen von Dir oder warum hast Du falsche Eingaben vorgenommen ?

Grüße
MarkusHD (2020-02-03 11:15:10+00:00): What is the source for this?
I stumbled over one government office that is obviously wrong: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5651533622
viloan (2018-05-30 11:07:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PT-53 (2018-05-30 12:45:14+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz dieses Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25440651/history#map=18/48.08934/9.21281 der Hohenzollernstraße von secondary auf tertiary heruntergestuft.
Bitte begründe dies doch kurz und erstelle dazu einen neuen Kommentar.
.
Du hast als Änderungssatz-Kommentar Tempolimit / Radweg Kreuz angegeben. Damit können andere Mapper (wie ich) wenig anfangen. Ein Änderungssatz sollte kurz angeben was wo gemacht wurde.
Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_.C3.84nderungssatz-Kommentare
.
Grüße und Willkommen bei OSM
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:32:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:56:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
trigpoint (2018-05-30 11:58:16+00:00): Hi, mountain hiking seems a bit extreme for The Ercall although I cannot claim to have any knowledge of sac scales :)
AntReid (2018-05-30 13:11:58+00:00): It ain't alpine - it's between 25%-33% incline. How should that be categorised?
trigpoint (2018-05-30 14:46:35+00:00): I would not have considered it strenuous enough to have a sac scale, but it is hiking at most.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2018-06-03 16:22:16+00:00): I have changed this to hiking, which still seems a bit extreme.

Cheers Phil
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
surveyor54 (2018-05-30 12:12:49+00:00): CS zu früh abgeschickt!

Bestehende Verbindung zwischen Lessingstraße und Niedergründauer Straße hergestellt.

source:
Ortsbesichtigung
R0bst3r (2018-06-04 08:37:06+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* Bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access beachten, access=no bedeutet, dass der Weg nicht benutzt werden darf, andere Regeln werden dann ignoriert. Deine Changesetbeschreibung würde ehr zu access=agricultural passen.
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59397080
viloan (2018-05-30 12:14:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pitscheplatsch (2018-05-30 19:49:19+00:00): Hi johnwhelan_import, welcome to OSM.

Did you discuss this removing or the previous import with the community? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59397142
freebeer (2018-05-31 14:42:07+00:00): This is not to answer for John, but to note that I have seen him actively discussing things in the HOT mailing list.
A quick check there shows he has commented not recently, but in March or so about the topics covered by recent changesets -  untagged ways and badly-drawn buildings.
A  more extensive discussion was carried out in Dec of 2017 about general HOT building quality.
That is not documentation as needed, but due to the scale and nature of HOT mapping, I don't know if such changesets should be seen as HOT internal bulk cleanups, where the data quality is simply too poor to salvage, and if that is the intent of this account, used for validation (I know nowt of HOT mapping other than quality can be ... um ...)
Other than removing doubly-mapped or outdated buildings, I can't trivially guess what could apply here.  I'd love to see an achavi that also allows a more extensive selection of layers of aerials, so at a glance I can see what might have been the case here; there are no underlying building outlines here.
The HOT mailing list is quieter of late, so I do not know if these removals are discussed in a walled garden shielded from my prying eyes, that seem popular amongst the yoof of today, or anyone more hip than myself, printing OSM maps on an ASR-33 on horribly yellowed paper rolls.
(Or punch cards.  Good for navigation by feel.)
sam93 (2018-06-03 22:44:08+00:00): First apols for missing the comments.  Someone had switched the account from the one the edits were made in to johnwhelan_import which uses an email account I don't normally check.

The background is one not very experienced mapper over five years ago mapped city blocks as a single building.  About a year later another mapper removed the tag building=yes.

One of the things I look for is untagged ways and I found 10,000 of these untagged city blocks.  I couldn't think of a sensible way to tag them.  I raised the matter of any local mappers in OSM_talk and about two months later I zapped these untagged ways after going through them and inspecting each and every one.  I then removed the tags as the second mapper had done on some of city blocks tagged building=yes mapped by the first mapper whom I had tried to contact to no avail.  

I have tools to spot duplicate buildings so I can delete the duplicates but tagging the entire city block as one building makes using them very difficult.

On looking at the map to find other untagged ways then I realized that the edits had been changed to johnwhelan_import well they aren't an import so I just deleted the untagged ways.

John
R0bst3r (2018-06-04 08:49:23+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
du hast um ein Review gebeten.
Hier kann ich allerdings nicht viel sagen. Die Einstufung sollte für die ganze Straße einheitlich sein, das hast du richtig gemacht.
Ob es secondary oder tertiary ist, kann man am Besten vor Ort entscheiden, das überlasse ich gerne dir. Siehe wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtertiary
Viele Grüße
R0bst3r (2018-06-04 09:03:51+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* Du hast hier einen Weg mit der Wohnfläche verbunden, dies ist leicht unsauber, bitte auf sowas achten.
Viel Erfolg noch und nicht entmutigen lassen!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59398305
François2 (2018-06-04 17:04:26+00:00): Bonjour,

Quel est le rapport avec le decatlhon dans ce changement ?
praeteritum (2023-01-01 04:16:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130737542.
dgitto (2018-05-30 21:35:49+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM
praeteritum (2023-01-01 04:12:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130737540.
praeteritum (2023-01-01 04:12:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130737538.
viloan (2018-05-30 13:08:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:47:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].