piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
complete_gth (2022-07-24 21:07:31+00:00): Hallo gnarfoni und wilkommen bei OSM! 
Ein kleiner Hinweis, wenn du wieder mit einem anderen Editor als StreetComplete arbeitest. Du hast hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370148442) roof:colour=rot eingetragen, der Wert müsste aber red sein, damit die Daten besser verwendet werden können (-> also englische Werte nutzen, sofern es eine sinnvolle Übersetzung gibt). 
Ich habe das für dich schon geändert und wünsche dir noch viel Spaß bei OSM.
DD1GJ (2022-07-17 15:32:03+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für Die Information. Allerdings wurde der Keltenweg technisch völlig falsch als eigenständiger Weg über die bereits bestehenden Wege und Straßen eingezeichnet. Da dabei auch die bestehenden Daten teilweise verändert oder gelöscht wurden, habe ich alle Eintragungen rückgängig gemacht.

Ausgeschilderte Wanderwege werden bei OSM als Relation erfasst, in welche die einzelnen Wegstücke eingetragen werden. Ein Beispiel eines anderen "Keltenweges" wäre

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9432648

https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=9432648&

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route=hiking

Ich habe den bisher eingetragenen Wegverlauf als GPX gesichert und schicke noch eine direkte Mail.
Bernhard W (2023-03-04 07:52:43+00:00): Hier sind viele Brücken falsch eingetragen bzw. leider falsch geändert worden. Beispielsweise 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076007123 ist überwiegend auf festem, aufgeschüttetem Boden und keine Brücke. 
Bitte nur Brücken eintragen, wo auch Brücken sind.
aceman444 (2022-09-24 06:32:47+00:00): Hi, there exists no PAAS company so it cannot be the operator of the parkings. "City of Bratislava" was better, but it should be written in Slovak as is the real name of the company = "Hlavné mesto Slovenskej republiky Bratislava". We can put the 'PAAS' name into 'brand' tag to distinguish the new parking network from the old parking systems.
aceman444 (2022-08-13 09:37:18+00:00): Hi, always provide the source of your data. Add the tag source= on the changeset. You only mention Ortofotomozaika SR photos, where you can't see the details you add. Otherwise your changes may be reverted as illegal.
Netro1 (2022-08-13 09:52:51+00:00): Thanks for the warning. Source=personal knowledge (since I work for the city, these are city operated parking lots)
aceman444 (2022-10-09 15:14:39+00:00): Dakujem
SomeoneElse (2022-07-17 23:16:10+00:00): My recollection is that the trig point is exactly at the top of Roseberry Topping...
Jethro10 (2022-07-18 07:44:38+00:00): I'm not disagreeing. Just can't understand how one thing can be both natural and man made, it's impossible. I've been splitting these out for many years under various logon's I use for just that reason. To me it's a slight fault with how OSM works really. Your the first one that's ever commented. However do as you wish, it's not the end of the world!
SomeoneElse (2022-07-30 15:41:10+00:00): I see that someone's also changed Whernside back (not sure if that was you or not).
SK53 (2022-07-30 15:58:47+00:00): When the trigpoint is located at the summit they are the logically the same object. The spot height on the OS maps will be that of the flush bracket on the pillar, rather at ground level. 

OSM keys were deliberately designed to allow for objects which are simultaneously two things at once (pubs with accommodation, convenience store with a post office, etc., memorial trees). Over time some get separated (often when something mapped as a node gets remapped as an area), but this is a feature not a bug. IIRC Snowdon's summit point is a trig point and an orientation table (tourism=viewpoint). One consequence of this is that one should never rely overmuch on the usual meaning of a word in English (I'm always a bit frustrated about tourism=hotel, because about 80% of my hotel stays have been work-related).

I guess you made the Whernside alteration too, but offset the trig point from it's actual location, rather than ensuring it was co-located with the peak tag. 

I appreciate that the iD editor may emphasise one over the other, but that should be addressed on the iD github page, not by changing the data. 

It's not just the UK where physical trig stations coincide with summits: I can think of several in Switzerland.
user_12630788 (2022-07-30 17:04:37+00:00): As I said, I can't help but see if differently. A trig point is not the same point as a peak. It's concrete and stuck on top of a peak. They are entirely separate entities, even though they touch. I'm not sure what you mean by the ID editor emphasising one or the other, I did it because it's how I see it. However it won't be done again......well not by me! Ok?
Jethro10 (2022-07-31 07:29:15+00:00): Ok, I wasn't happy all night last night then the penny dropped for me. As well as my now famous :-) man made = natural Paradox, SK53 mentioned heights. Any trig point I've seen is approx 1.5m tall, yet as a combo point it can only have one height/elevation. So according to SK53, every combo is totally incorrect on one of the heights by close to 1.5m. So now every combo has 2 faults,  my original conceptual one, but the height is a lot more serious. Seems like the height of a combo because of OS (other countries don't have OS) we may have the correct height for a Trig point, but each peak is overstated by close to 1.5m, and each point needs an elevation for 2 items.
I'm really struggling to see why I'm wrong here.
SK53 (2022-07-31 12:56:34+00:00): The flush bracket is on the metal plaque low down on the pillar, so the elevation is not of the top of the pillar. Most elevations on maps in the past 30 years are probably not derived from the triangulation done using trig points anyway, so the issue is fairly moot.

A general rule of thumb is that if a thing has been mapped in a particular way for a long time then that is the consensus across a body of mappers. This is particularly true for somewhere like Whernside or Roseberry Topping where it is likely a *lot* of mappers have visited. It's usually best to respect that consensus even if one differs in opinion.

Jerry aka SK53
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-14 19:17:49+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-14 19:17:57+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
martin-kokos (2022-07-14 09:25:16+00:00): Wrong description. Actually added some detail along the coast and added roads and driveways
PT-53 (2022-08-04 05:59:45+00:00): Hallo torsten,
Du hast diese Linie ohne Merkmale
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078436966/history
über diesen Weg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24217073/history
gelegt. Das war wohl ein Versehen.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
_torsten_ (2022-08-04 06:09:51+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Ja, das war ein Versehen. Ich werde das nachher korrigieren.
Frans S (2022-07-14 10:02:17+00:00): Hello RoijDor. Thanks for reviewing.
A few remarks. It is possible that I mapped bushes/trees as buildings. Difficult to recognize. 
For the purpose of this project it is not an issue that buildings are round or squared mapped. Even a small offset is acceptable.
You  marked this task as "more mappings needed" 
As a validator you can map the missing buildings as well. You are looking on those at that moment.
I do a lot of validating here, and I only invalidate a task when the majority  of the buildings still need to be mapped.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123599476
Frans S (2022-08-01 10:15:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123599841
KrzysztZ (2022-09-26 09:02:23+00:00): Widzę, że zaktualizowałeś granice poligonu Lipa - teraz są zgodne z faktycznym ustawieniem tablic ostrzegających, nawet jeśli wydaje sie to dziwne - rzeczywiście z DW 856 między Radomyślem a Pniowem można wjechać prosto na teren poligonu. Skąd miałeś dane? Analogiczna sytuacja jest z niedalekim poligonem Nowa Dęba - obecne zaznaczenie obejmuje teren gdzie odbywają się cały czas ćwiczenia/strzelania i jakbyśmy sie pojawili tam to - jak przeżyjemy -NA PEWNO nas zgarnie żandarmeria. Teren oznakowany zakazem jest znacznie większy, np. DW 871 między Stalową Wolą a Jamnicą - na odcinku przebiegającym przez las po obu stronach ma tablice zakazu wstępu, DW 872 między Bojanowem a przejazdem przez LHS - po stronie północnej ciągły zakaz wstępu itp.
Dawid2849 (2024-09-21 18:52:11+00:00): Właśnie - skąd pochodzą dane? Ostatnio przejeżdzałem DW871 ze Stalowej do Tarnobrzega i chętnie bym naniósł teren wojskowy objęty zakazem wstępu
abakus_uploader (2022-07-14 22:32:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MarbleRock (2022-07-16 18:57:48+00:00): puno adresa ti je bilo netočno (copy-paste)
rubinos (2022-07-22 00:04:23+00:00): La velocidad máxima de la línea no es de 180 km/h. Revisa tus fuentes, estaba bien antes. La línea ha sido diseñada para velocidades de 350 km/h, siendo la velocidad máxima autorizada de 300 a la puesta en servicio del ETCS.
Santi2222 (2022-07-25 10:01:55+00:00): Sé bien que la línea está diseñada para 350 y que con ETCS será de 300. Lo que importa es que mientras la señalización sea ASFA únicamente la velocidad máxima no es de 300. Según ese criterio la línea Madrid-Barcelona debería ir etiquetada con maxspeed=350 ya que con el sistema de señalización adecuado se podría ir a esa velocidad.

Dicho esto, creo que sí que hay un error, ya que si no me equivoco la velocidad máxima autorizada en la línea ahora mismo es de 220, siendo 180 la velocidad máxima alcanzada por un tipo de tren
rubinos (2022-07-25 20:30:30+00:00): Es de 200 km/h la velocidad máxima autorizada, por el ASFA Digital. En el caso de Madrid-Barcelona, es de 300 km/h la velocidad máxima por lo que el maxspeed está bien (hay un tramo que viene como 310 km/h pero eso duró pocos años, hasta 2016)
喵耳引力波 (2022-08-07 07:09:34+00:00): Fixed
CjMalone (2023-11-05 16:49:26+00:00): Hey it looks like you've removed some details eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2624736613

https://www.dunnesstores.com/store-locator/stores/41 to http://www.dunnesstores.com/

http?! in 2022, and from a specific website for the POI to a generic brand website.
VictorIE (2023-11-05 18:17:17+00:00): Fixed.
CjMalone (2023-11-05 20:04:48+00:00): Thanks
JezzaJay (2022-12-13 19:17:11+00:00): Hi Tushna! Welcome to OSM and HOT, thank you very much for contributing and learning to map. Please do not add 'name' to the buildings/objects. This is for local knowledge to be added later if the actual building has a name.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123601967
yasslay (2022-07-14 12:38:33+00:00): Hello! St Saviour's Close appears to be a cul-de-sac with a grassy patch in the middle and I have addressed the fixme request.

Kind regards,
AOOSMU
vojtechzaboril (2022-07-14 13:38:53+00:00): I changed it to turning_loop instead of turning_circle. In my opinion, it has the correct meaning.
Regards.
V
ameziol (2022-11-14 23:19:25+00:00): hej, chodnik w budowie powinien mieć tag construction=footway
C2oc4 (2022-11-30 09:51:28+00:00): Witaj ;) ok
user_5359 (2022-07-15 10:07:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a lot of node with foreign keys. We need no additional gps information (every node has a coordinate) we don’t use the key photo, and the image are not useable, because you need a account on the fileserver. Please cleanup the mistake.
Saeed SJ (2022-07-25 04:22:11+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز
ظاهرا شما تازه وارد این پلتفرم شدین و آشنایی چندانی با تایپ خطوط و نحوه ادیت ندارید. بهتر نیست ابتدا آموزش ببینید و اینطور زحمات سایر ادیتورهارو خراب نکنید؟
با این وضعیت ادیت مطمئن باشید که ریپورت و بلاک خواهید شد.
user_5359 (2022-08-15 10:59:26+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9887006438 (one of three objects). What is the meaning of the tags
RIGHT_UTM = 456342 / 5769165
RIGHT_ele = 146
RIGHT_name = Parkplatz Werther Straße
RIGHT_ref = HA001
?
danieldegroot2 (2022-07-14 11:08:29+00:00): website should preferably be brand:website or operator:website instead, since it belongs to the chain, not the store itself.
VictorIE (2022-07-14 12:05:05+00:00): Yes, you're right. I've been trying to do it recently. This time I had too many sites with too many details to fix.
canfe (2022-07-15 13:22:52+00:00): Grazie per l'inserimento del sentiero ma devi collegarlo a quello esistente con un nodo.
Inoltre il depuratore non si chiama depuratore altrimenti ogni panchina si chiamerebbe panchina. Solo nomi propri. Sulla wiki man made troverai quel che cerchi.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123603002
user_1566574 (2023-04-28 18:11:03+00:00): Hi!
Hi merge + deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9887012937 because it already exists at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791558804.

Thanks for your improvements! :D
Ropino (2022-08-15 08:54:12+00:00): Hallo,
"highway=0.35" !?
Bitte prüfen/korrigieren.
rms_LDIE (2022-08-15 09:26:39+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ist korrigiert. Sollte "height" und nicht "highway" heißen.
charles chilufya (2022-07-14 19:58:12+00:00): @Fatness,
hi i am just being curious about tagging foundations= buildings/yes instead of building= constructions. make sure also to finish mapping everything before marking as finished completely
❤️‍🔥 (2022-07-14 11:21:56+00:00): the Horsham Downs Link is not open....
MxxCon (2022-07-15 03:10:51+00:00): Hello.
Am I misunderstanding what was done or did you delete a few seemingly correct relations here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123604536
Photo_MC (2022-07-18 06:32:55+00:00): Hi MxxCon, Thank you for reaching out. I am not sure why the deleted relations are visible as part of my changeset as I have only moved a single node 9335876515 to smoothen the alignment. Analysing each deleted relation, it seems that JayMontana36 made these edits via the following two changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120560726
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114900276
user_5359 (2022-07-15 09:59:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have remove your SEO Spam entry without any OSM key. If this is an error, we can help you to find the correct keys.
eggie (2022-07-14 13:08:25+00:00):     Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

    Feedback.. Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes Is dat hier het geval. Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no en evt ook voor moped en mofa.

    MVG,

    Eggie

    Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-14 13:17:12+00:00): Feedback  2 De trappen zou je iets kunnen inkorten dmv splitsen.
Kijk je nog even?
eggie (2022-07-14 13:22:44+00:00): Aangepast voor fietsers 
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.376658589&lng=4.538463950&z=19

Geldt de uitzonderingen ook voor moped ?
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-07-21 21:07:09+00:00): Beste IIVQ   Waarom edits all over the world in één changeset. 
Beter niet doen is mijn advies.
MVG
eggie
IIVQ (2022-07-23 11:42:52+00:00): Dit was een eenmalige edit om alle foute station of the cross-voorkomens in een keer consistent te mappen. Het waren er niet zo veel dus daarom vond ik één edit wel gepast.
eggie (2022-07-23 11:48:11+00:00): Oke... duidelijk.
Het triggert validators. Die gaan weer kijken of er schade is.
Maar hier dus niet het geval.
Groet
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-16 05:03:59+00:00): Hi Yuliya, it looks like you put the building through a blender.

Also, why was the building made round when it is clearly square on the satellite imagery.

Would it be ok if I revert this to undo the mess?  Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:24:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-14 15:50:23+00:00): Aquí has ​​quitado varias carreteras, por mucho que sean privadas o terrestres, no deberían quitarse. Puede poner access=private y no eliminar. Esto es lo que hizo: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123605846/
SHARCRASH (2022-07-14 16:22:16+00:00): Hi D! I have to contact you because i see you deleted areas and left empty spaces without replacement. So a couple of questions if you don't mind:
- I suppose these scrubs/woods have been chopped of?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678677408
- At the Schëfflénger Schräiner you deleted the area but not the business, accidental deletion?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38336778
- the key "barrier" needs machine readable values in order to show up in any map, so putting barrier=wire_fence won't work, specific fence are detailed with a subtag. So it is barrier=fence + fence_type=wire 
I corrected this last along other observations.
wilda69 (2022-07-14 16:42:08+00:00): Indeed a huge area has been chopped and relandscaped. It appears to be part of the big Alzette project.  There were so many MPs covering that area that I deleted the wood and rebuilt it. This may have caused the accidental deletion of the Schreiner's area. I have redone it as industrial but maybe you know what the correct tag should be..
There has been a lot of changes also  North of the reserve and that possibly will become an extension of it. More plans have been posted  on changes in the field W of the CIS Schifflange.
Thanks for the new fence tag protocol. was not aware of it.
btw, there had been some very long duckboards  plotted and unchallenged for a few years. In fact there is only a small one leading to the hut.
Dan
SHARCRASH (2022-07-14 18:15:23+00:00): Yeah that place is quite complex in data.

Industrial is good, since they work with wood and transform the raw material to make structures for the construction sector. I had put commercial long time ago but i think industrial is better. Well done! :)

I only visited the new bridge on E side few weeks ago. Last time i went on the W side with the bridge/pier was several years ago and took the most southern shortcut. You had put the entire highway with "duckboard". For me the section i visited looked more like an elevated pier/bridge with supports. Duckboards for me don't have any supports. They are placed directly on the ground without any underlying structure. Hence i assumed the entire way was the same and why i added the note "added all tags related to an elevated structure for going over, they all are duplicates, this way everybody is happy" Pier or bridge same kind of structure for me: a span over supports or suspended. I don't like when there are new tags which don't bring any fundamental difference from older established tags. Poor programmers need always to update again and again the demands of people who are too picky. :) Hence why the sub-tag scheme is important. They use an established basic tag and bring further detail.
Saeed SJ (2022-07-25 04:27:47+00:00): ضمن اینکه از نقشه هوایی قدیمی استفاده میکنید حتی آشنایی درستی با نحوه کشیدن لاین ها ندارید و در واقع به نوعی دارید در نقشه خرابکاری می کنید در نقشه که مجبور هستیم این موارد رو گزارش بدیم.
eggie (2022-10-11 10:49:50+00:00): Dag Frank.. Klopt dit wel een duiker van de Hoge Gouwe tot de IJssel?
Dat is toch voor een groot deel open water? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-11 19:22:24+00:00): Het is inmiddels vandaag door een andere mapper aangepast.
Gr eggie
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:07:24+00:00): ?
bxl-forever (2022-08-29 18:26:53+00:00): I think there might be an issue here.
There is an M2 sign that explicitely allows cyclists on the bus lane.
There are two (legal) options for cyclists here: use the bus lane (C3+M2) or use the shared sidewalk with D10 signs.
I had to undo your changeset.
Have a nice day.
Vinber-Pro (2025-02-08 10:27:46+00:00): bonjour :)
sur la ferme tu as positionné shop=farm aussi bien sur un poi que sur la "surface" avec le landuse=farmyard.

j'ai plutôt tendance à séparer :
- landuse=farmyard qui peut contenir un siret aussi, et tout
- shop=farm positionné précisément pour pouvoir aussi mettre des éléments plus spécifiques comme horaire, accessibilité, ...

le doublon est-il voulu, une erreur ?
"trouvé" car https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Yro (oui nous travaillons dans les Landes :) )

et c'est tellement chouette de voir d'autres cas apparaître !

à plus
peter_hardy (2022-07-16 03:04:34+00:00): Hi, the Kenna Street alignment was correct, despite the latest DCS data. From what I can gather, council realigned this intersection in 2017. I attempted to capture this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/peter_hardy/traces/4238755 before realigning the intersection in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120304298
radiotrefoil (2022-07-16 03:21:36+00:00): Ah thanks for letting me know. I'll try to double check with maxar next time I do realigning here as that should be very recent. Hope this super old DCS imagery gets updated soon. Cheers
radiotrefoil (2022-07-17 09:27:30+00:00): Fixed in changeset 123713803 using maxar imagery
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-07-14 12:40:53+00:00): #mbx_usa_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123608362
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-07-14 12:41:08+00:00): #mbx_usa_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123608362
Jakka (2022-07-15 09:24:52+00:00): is dit echt een bar zoals wiki voorschrijft ?
Ligging bijna op de sporen/perron ?
een naam site ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbar