piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2020-02-05 20:18:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2020-02-05 22:20:35+00:00): Dag Suzanne.. Lijkt me oke.
Meestal tag ik vehicle=no als er niet gereden mag worden.  Dan pak je alles met wielen in één keer. 
MVG,
eggie
archie (2020-02-05 20:42:57+00:00): Varför i hela friden har du satt highway=path på en boundary-way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477353189)? Är du säker på vad du gör?
archie (2020-02-05 20:52:00+00:00): Varför lägger du till name_1=Risvendenspåret här (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222319887) jämte name=Kyrkvägen? Du vet - eller borde veta - att name_1 inte är en giltig key?
archie (2020-02-05 21:04:28+00:00): Varför lägger du till name=Risvedenspåret på denna way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443080781), när just detta namn redan finns i route-relationen där denna way ingår?
MapMakerGal (2020-02-06 09:36:50+00:00): Bien hecho, de todas formas tampoco hace falta eliminar el name:pt, lo voy a volver a añadir, toda información es bienvenida
archie (2020-02-05 20:49:03+00:00): Varför lägger du till name=Risvedenspåret på denna way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443080781), när just detta namn redan finns i route-relationen där denna way ingår?
eggie (2020-02-05 22:23:07+00:00): Staat er een bord wandelpad. (Rond blauw bord met wandelaar met kind)  dan 
highway=footway. accesstags zijn dan niet nodig, want het is immers een wandelpad.
Geen bord... dan highway=path.. en dan wel accesstags voor tweewielers. 
Dus welk bord staat vooraan?
Gr eggie
user_5359 (2020-02-06 04:06:41+00:00): Hello (again)! In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
Bonjour (encore) ! Dans l'OSM, nous avons utilisé l'abréviation de deux lettres du pays en majuscules pour la valeur de addr:country. La valeur est CA au lieu de Canada.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 13913419, 13913940, 14055721, 14095568, 14109385, 14109880, 14119299, 14120822, 14121294, 14121734, 14121801, 14149256, 14187013, 14194883, 14194922, 14207849, 14212058, 14221012, 14221306, 14221746, 14226293, 14239304, 14249209, 14259310, 14266455, 14266573, 14266645, 14268517, 14268941, 14277462, 14277665, 14279260, 14287970, 14288141, 14288221, 14288394, 14291660, 14300880, 14300901, 14300915, 14301137, 14302043, 14302164, 14330679, 14338567, 14338821, 14339028, 14583476, 14918846, 14931635, 14932160, 14932183, 14943027, 14963650, 14963894, 14967961, 14975111, 14975607, 15406602, 15407004, 15439144, 15441018, 15442991, 15451252, 15451732, 15452211, 15461174, 15461342, 15461584, 15461828, 15461919, 15465133, 15465403, 15473272, 15473594, 15473712, 15476640, 15477255, 15478042, 15478539, 15479244, 15479745, 16088602, 16092859, 16093932, 16107461, 16107896, 16122494, 16122885, 16123318, 16123577, 16136003, 16150673, 16151292, 16162785, 16163326, 16179694, 16179927, 16187701, 16188645, 16188736, 16189049, 16192356, 16203732, 16204006, 16208423, 16263897.
attili1 (2020-02-07 13:06:38+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse_Revert,

I am from Grab data team while working on Indonesia region, I observed that the secondary highway (way 169382762) which was deleted earlier by mapper "Nicho pratama" in 2013 has now been reverted by you in changeset [80608729] which has created duplicates for entire stretch ~5kms [link]

Can you help and make the necessary changes to solve the duplicates?

Thanks
attili1
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-09 23:22:57+00:00): @attili1 thanks - I've removed that duplicate and a couple of others where the road continued.  I've also deleted a few rogue nodes such as 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/609192282/history that were missed by the revert.  There may be others - if you find any please let us know.
iWowik (2020-02-05 22:55:35+00:00): Приветствую вас в проекте!
Я тоже заметил, что вы рисуете домики и к тому нарушаете соглашение о наименовании улиц (пишете слово улица с большой буквы)

Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их сложно найти, чтобы понять где на карте какой адрес нужна карта или схема.
К тому же у различных карт и планов есть правообладатели и без их явного разрешения данные в OSM вносить нельзя.
Целью проекта является сбор данных, свободных от претензий других лиц, поэтому данные, вносимые без разрешения их владельцами могут в какой-то момент быть удалены из проекта.
Mexican_Doremon (2021-04-23 07:47:26+00:00): Hola ,Tenga cuidado al cambiar la clasificación y al clasificar las formas
mueschel (2020-02-08 10:06:03+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? Something went wrong here with the tags.

Thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2020-02-15 23:42:02+00:00): Please use caution when editing ramps, you messed up the transition on Exit 26A.  Lane change restrictions are mapped.
DrJume (2020-04-14 15:17:28+00:00): Vielen Dank für Ihren Beitrag! 
Knoten 7188852625 und 7188852628 sind private Parkplätze (Tiefgaragen). Diese werden in Maps.me und anderen OSM-basierten Kartenapps als Parkmöglichkeit angezeigt.
Ich hoffe, Sie haben nichts dagegen, dass ich darum bitte, diese zu entfernen.
DrJume (2020-04-14 15:48:44+00:00): Außerdem würden diese Garagen nicht als Orientierungspunkt genutzt werden können.
Nakaner (2020-04-15 06:33:54+00:00): Hallo,

die beiden bemängelten Tiefgarageneinfahrten (die zwei Nodes) sind mit access=private getaggt und somit als privat gekennzeichnet. Wenn MAPS.ME diese als öffentlich darstellt, ist das ein Fehler von MAPS.ME. Es gibt unzählige nicht öffentliche Parkplätze in OSM und damit haben die Anwendungen von Drittanbietern klarzukommen. Eine Löschung widerspräche den Prinzipien von OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Viele Grüße

Michael
Martinummo (2020-04-28 20:02:56+00:00): Hallo DrJume,
vielen Dank für Ihre freundliche Nachricht. Wie Michael bereits ausführte, sollen die Einträge in OSM Geoinformationen aller Art darstellen. Daher habe ich auch die zwei Tiefgarageneinfahrten gemappt und als privat gekenzeichnet. Wenn maps.me diese nun wie öffentliche Parkmöglichkeiten darstellt ist das ärgerlich. 
Aufgrund der vielen öffentlichen Stellplätze im Straßenraum in der Umgebung denke ich aber nicht, dass jemand Ihre Tiefgarage zielgerichtet anfährt. Tiefgaragen sind als Parkmöglichkeit eher unbeliebt, der Parkdruck im unmittelbaren Wohnumfeld ist gering und die Einfahrten in Ihre Tiefgaragen sehen nicht wie öffentliche aus. 
Auch von mir viele Grüße
Martinummo
muchichka_s (2020-12-17 05:11:09+00:00): Why did you erase ref for M-06? 900 meters of approach to Rivne are included in the road
GeoidDude (2020-12-18 00:02:07+00:00): Hello muchicha_s, thanks for pointing this out. GazEddyr is not currently with our team, but I believe this editor was not aware of the entrances which are often included in Ukrainian ref routes, and misinterpreted this sign when making that edit (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/FqJAqC8Q9ohSe8BU6tAbzQ). Our team knows to reference the wiki page related to Ukrainian state highways (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Автомобільні_шляхи_України_державного_значення), and that point has been reiterated. Please let us know if you discover any other issues, and thanks again!
azakh-world (2020-02-07 12:29:52+00:00): Hi.
You removed "subway" tags from the stations of Lima Metro. Meanwhile this rapid transit system is considered as "metro" (synonym to "subway"): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_metro_systems
Overground location is not relevant in this classification.

Best regards,
Alexey
BikeRoad (2020-02-09 18:27:28+00:00): Hi Alexey.
I thought the label "subway = yes" means a subway station is under the ground, even the icon in editor ID exposes that difference between a station under the ground and one on the ground. therefore remove the tag.
Thank you for your clarification.
pangoSE (2020-02-16 15:36:37+00:00): Please split edits like this in smaller changesets.
Carto'Cité (2020-02-14 10:26:10+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai supprimé le cycleway=track car je pense qu'il est en doublon avec la piste décrite à côté https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678263588. Les photos Mapillary datent un peu et elle se prolonge un peu loin ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772391075 ; peut-être que l'aménagement a été allongé il n'y a pas longtemps. Si vous avez d'autres informations n'hésitez pas à me dire.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Qdg4 (2020-02-14 20:19:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur cette portion, il y a n'y a pas de doublon. Il y a bien un large trottoir qui accueille une piste cyclable (côté route) et une piste piétonne (côté batiment), séparés par une haie : https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/mYdw7a0Xzk04xN4cKR1DSw
(contrairement au passage dans la forêt où la piste est commune pour les piétons et les vélos).
L'objet de ma modification consistait en priorité à indiquer que la traversée sous le pont n'était pas sécurisée à vélo. Dans l'idéal, il faudrait mapper un cycleway séparé de la route pour éviter la confusion. Je vais m'en occuper prochainement.
Cordialement
Carto'Cité (2020-02-16 18:30:18+00:00): Merci pour ton retour,
Oui mon message n'était peut-être pas clair :) J'ai bien identifié le trottoir séparé en deux avec d'un côté les piétons et de l'autre les vélos. Le problème là était que la partie cyclable était décrite 2 fois ; elle ne l'est plus qu'une fois maintenant que le cycleway=track est supprimé. Donc pour l'instant les deux chemins séparés par les arbres sont décrit par un seul way mais qui précise segregated=yes donc c'est bon mais on pourrait utiliser 2 way vu l'importance de la séparation
Tel que le chemin est décrit, il est assimilé à une piste cyclable mais si tu le séparer en 2 way distinc, un highway=cycleway sera très bien mais ça vaudra le coup de préciser qu'il est bien sur le tottoir en précisant cycleway=sidewalk ; ce qui ne plaît pas trop au puriste du code de la route qui préfèrent en général décrire ce type d'aménagement par un highway=path bicycle=designated + footway=sidewalk + surface=asphalt.
N'hésite pas à me contacter si tu as des interrogations sur ces descriptions ou si tu penses qu'il a des informations qui m'ont échappé.
À bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
abakus_uploader (2020-02-05 23:30:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2020-02-06 23:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Baloo Uriza (2020-02-15 23:40:11+00:00): Please use caution when editing ways, your edit screwed up the lane tagging on the onramp.
eggie (2020-02-06 07:03:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review... In OSM geen adressen aanmaken, maar bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Ik heb de info even samengevoegd met die adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
czubi (2020-10-05 14:18:11+00:00): amenity=childcare, bitte mal lesen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=childcare
eggie (2020-02-06 07:07:13+00:00): Dag Bert.. Hier staat het wel keurig op de BAG-adresnode. Eigenlijk geen spaties in het formaat van het telefoonnummer.
MVG,
Eggie
Bert Spin (2020-02-06 08:12:49+00:00): Bedankt Eggie, ik heb het begrepen.
user_5359 (2020-02-06 04:13:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is the bar open from 07:00 (7pm) or from (19:00 (7 am) open? 
Hint: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
rskedgell (2020-02-07 09:18:19+00:00): You appear to have deleted several shops and converted a mixed-use building to a landuse polygon. Reverted in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80682157
rskedgell (2020-02-07 09:16:32+00:00): You appear to have deleted several shops, changeset fully reverted in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80682157
Anas Almzoghy (2020-03-30 09:49:28+00:00): أخي عبدالله

الرجاء التأكد من التعديلات التي تقوم بها ولا تقم بتغيير تصنيفات الطرق أو تغيير الأوسمة tags بشكل عشوائي مثلما فعلت مع مسار السكة الحديدية القديم مما أربك سير عمل العديد من تطبيقات الخرائط لأن هذه الطريق لا وجود لها أصلاً!

تحياتي
user_5359 (2020-02-06 04:20:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
hvalentim (2020-02-12 22:58:58+00:00): Qual é que é o interesse em apagar imediatamente o contributo do utilizador:
1) Sem lhe dar oportunidade de o melhorar?
2) Sem lhe fornecer qualquer tipo de orientação?
Para mais com base num pressuposto errado e puramente adivinhado quanto à sua "ficcionalidade."
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-02-13 01:41:06+00:00): Ora viva, como podes verificar ainda não respondeu aos pedidos de esclarecimento.
quanto à orientação, é dada quando a primeira edição é feita num tutorial, que inclusive tive o prazer de traduzir para português.
Se encontrares alguma referência ao elemento que ele adicionou, agradeço que partilhes, que não encontrei nada.
hvalentim (2020-02-13 09:52:19+00:00): Desde logo, o que é te faz ter tanta certeza de que é um “ele”?
Se alguma coisa impede o OSM em Portugal de atingir o pleno potencial é a falta de contribuidores e interessados.  Presumir e tratar indiscriminadamente os primeiros contributos como actos de vandalismo e alvos de suspeição e recriminação pelos quais se pede, com deficientes modos, contas não vai de certeza ajudar a que isso melhor. Improvavelmente haverá uma segunda edição.
Quanto a referências “ao elemento”, basta ‘googlar’. São inúmeras. Acresce o facto de, por acaso, alguns de nós, até conhecermos o Seixal.
Filohipo (2020-02-13 13:53:39+00:00): No dia 5FEV enviei ao "MadeinSeixal" a seguinte mensagem:
"Olá Bem vindo ao OSM Fizeste a tua primeira edição neste mapa colaborativo, mas confesso que esta edição me deixou um pouco confuso. Ao marcares o ponto “Made In Seixal” neste banco de areia o que pretendes indicar ? Se é confuso para mim, seguramente é confuso para muitos dos utilizadores do mapa OSM. Cumprimentos F" 
Até ao momento não obtive resposta. 
PS fiz uma busca por "MadeInSeixal" e só obtive referencias a um clube de futebol.
hvalentim (2020-02-13 16:20:07+00:00): Habitualmente, a mente procede por confirmação. Ou seja, procura apoiar os seus pré-juízos. 

Procurando com abertura não é todavia difícil colocá-los em causa:

https://www.facebook.com/madeinseixal/
https://empresite.jornaldenegocios.pt/MADE-IN-SEIXAL-ASSOCIACAO-ARTES-SABORES-SEIXAL.html

Pela mesma ordem de razão, o que nunca cativou ninguém foi uma primeira impressão de repúdio.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-02-13 16:32:40+00:00): Como podes ver não bate a bota com a perdigota a localização, as etiquetas e a ausência de resposta do contribuidor.
Filohipo (2020-02-13 18:49:08+00:00): Muito obrigado pela informação que o Seixal tem uma associação de Artes e Sabores.
Continua sem resposta a minha pergunta:
"Ao marcares o ponto “Made In Seixal” neste banco de areia o que pretendes indicar ? "
hvalentim (2020-02-13 19:02:53+00:00): Isso não justifica que se aliene o potencial contribuidor e entre com os pés. Nem toda a gente está familiarizada com os procedimentos de georreferência e muito menos com a interface do OSM. As pessoas merecem o benefício da dúvida e um mínimo de tempo que não a expectativa de que tudo se resolva no mesmo dia. Afinal qual foi o “crime”? Adicionar um (1) nodo inteirinho inútil. Quantas linhas rectas há no mapa que ao invés de dois, consomem, 3, 4… meia dúzia de nodos?
Pellissippie (2020-02-21 05:56:10+00:00): Hi Abdullah. I don’t think the TAH15 exists. As far as I know the Trans African Highway network only has 9 routes. What are the ref tags you are adding? Are they Libyan highway numbers, and if so, can you share where the numbers came from?
Anas Almzoghy (2020-03-30 15:23:11+00:00): Hey Pellissippie, it seems that Abdullah has many questionable edits and he seems to be a mass "arm-chair" mapper since many of his edits in my city and the cities I've visited nearby aren't reflecting what's on the ground.
As for this edit, the only East-West highway in Libya is TAH1 (Costal Highway) and there's also TAH3 that's North-South. I'll leave reverting this edit to you, or if you want, I'll happily do it!
Pellissippie (2020-04-01 00:01:10+00:00): Hi Anas Almzoghy. Since I am not local and cannot confirm exactly how the Libyan refs should be, I think it would be better if you reverted it. 
Are the street names and places being added also incorrect, or is it just the classification changes and new refs that are questionable?
woodpeck (2020-02-07 18:43:52+00:00): What is the purpose of this newly introduced micro road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770089902 ?
user_9517839 (2020-02-17 21:55:04+00:00): I'm truly sorry for my edits it's not my intention to purposely ruin osm. I'm just trying to edit my area as I feel it was not mapped correctly.
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:08:00+00:00): Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to Customers. This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
gsravya1 (2021-02-17 04:08:11+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for the delayed response, I've made the necessary changes in the changeset(#99417004). Thanks for the information. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
gsravya1
viloan (2020-02-06 02:17:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jpennycook (2020-02-21 10:40:01+00:00): Hello!

In this and some other changesets near what was Runnymede Roundabout near Egham and Staines, you changed sets of nodes which were historically separate highway=crossing and highway=traffic_signal back into the separate nodes, after another person had joined them together into a single node.  I find it very useful when they are separate, as they show where vehicles should stop at white lines compared to where people should cross.

Could you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81294471 where the same person has just merged the crossing and traffic_signals nodes again further east, please?

Jon
MacLondon (2020-02-21 17:58:31+00:00): Hi Jon, I had a look, and in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81327871 I've 'fixed' the 3 crossings that I could detect in this area.

Regards,
Mac
jpennycook (2020-02-24 08:14:17+00:00): Thanks Mac.

I had to undelete some cycleways that the same person had deleted in Addlestone and Pooley Green.

Jon
user_5359 (2020-02-06 04:09:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-03 18:00:09+00:00): Are there any remains of that level crossing present at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7189169379/history ?

Have you mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770097474 based on survey/aerial or solely historic maps, not checking are any remains still present?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-18 09:58:03+00:00): What about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7189169378 - have you mapped it based on survey or merely old maps, without verification by survey?
InagakiM (2020-02-25 10:43:49+00:00): 道路からタグを削除（して表示されないように）されたようですが、どういう意図でしょうか。単なる作業ミスであれば、リバートよろしくお願いします。
pbswakop (2020-02-08 23:16:00+00:00): this venue is closed for more than 3 years
Kittatinny (2020-02-12 10:25:42+00:00): Hi pbswakop, thanks for providing this information, I’ve added the abandoned tag.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-10 17:32:39+00:00): Hello,

Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  I wonder if you could help?  People have noticed lots of new village and town ways added in Sweden in the last week or so.  Is that part of some kind of organised editing activity?  Would it be possible to provide us with more details?  

Also, you've said the change here is "temporary"?  Are you expecting to change it later?

If you have any other questions, just email data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-02-06 04:26:05+00:00): *former* Walmart building
Dimacn (2020-02-06 06:35:25+00:00): Пожалуйста скажите, зачем вы добавили тег парка, когда парк там уже отмечен как 6 лет - 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239715417
user_5359 (2020-02-06 14:27:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.