piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 17:38:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:11:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Allroads (2016-10-25 12:23:57+00:00): Are these embankment tages discussed with the forum, the conversion from your source tags to osm tags. waterway on a polygon, missing water, Do you have a conversion tag plan?
Again, where is it documented.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
highflyer74 (2016-10-27 06:22:13+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, bei OSM mitzuarbeiten, würde ich Dir empfehlen, einen richtigen Editor wie iD oder am besten JOSM zu verwenden. Maps.Me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen kommt (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits).

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 17:37:33+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:12:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:14:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:14:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:48:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
dair (2016-11-06 12:59:22+00:00): Такая вот исторически сложившаяся граница: http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=118306
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
diachla (2017-03-08 09:43:14+00:00): Hallo waldviertlerkartograph,

du hast zwar die Gebäude neu eingezeichnet, die alten in diesem Bereich aber gelöscht, wo auch viele andere Details wie Hausnummern, Gebäudetyp usw. bereits vorhanden waren.
Dadurch findet man bei OsmAnd - der Android OSM-Navigation - z.B. nur mehr ein paar Hausnummern in Siebenlinden.

Diese Information ist jetzt komplett verschwunden.
Meiner Meinung nach sollte dieser Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht werden oder die Details wieder nachgezeichnet / getaggt werden.

LG, diachla
waldviertlerkartograph (2017-03-08 11:41:38+00:00): Hallo Diachla!
Danke erstmal für den Hinweis und deine Aufmerksamkeit - es ist immer toll, wenn sich Leute um die Qualität der OSM Daten Gedanken machen!
Es gibt sehr unterschiedliche Meinungen darüber, wie genau man Sachen in OSM einzeichnen sollte. Meiner Meinung sollte das mit höchster Genauigkeit (wie immer gilt auch hier mit bestem Wissen und Gewissen - genauer als die Quellen sind kann man nicht arbeiten) geschehen. Warum ich das so streng sehe lässt sich leicht erklären: als der OSM Community nur schlechte oder garkeine Luftbilder zur Verfügung standen, konnte man Gebäude nur mit ungenauer Geometrie eintragen, doch heute mit Geoimage.at sieht die Sache ganz anders aus!
Ich will damit nicht sagen, dass nicht so genau eingetragene Gebäude wertlos sind - bei OSM ist jede zusätzliche Information wertvoll - jedoch bin ich der Meinung, dass man sich beim Mappen doch die Zeit nehmen sollte, alles ordentlich einzutragen! Um mit Google Maps mithalten zu können reichen freilich ungenauere Geometrien völlig aus, aber wenn man es noch etwas genauer nimmt, dann lassen sich aus OSM Daten noch viele andere tolle Anwendungen ableiten, welche einfach saubere Geometrien verlangen!

Nun zu den Gebäuden in Siebenlinden: ich habe die bestehenden Gebäude durch neue ersetzt, um meinen Qualitätsansprüchen gerecht zu werden! Normalerweise ersetzte ich in solchen Fällen die bestehenden Tags der vorigen Gebäude sofort, hab dies aber in Siebenlinden mit dem Vorhaben, es später zu erledigen auf unbestimmte Zeit verschoben!
Ich möchte diese Thematik nicht in einen Machtkampf oder Editwar ausarten lassen, und bitte dich daher, keinen Revert zu veranlassen! Ich bin ein erfahrener Mapper und bin mir über den von mir verursachten Informationsverlust wohl bewusst und werde die Hausnummern hier in naher Zukunft wieder eintragen.
Alternativ könntest dies natürlich auch du erledigen!
Warum ich noch gegen einen Revert bin: das Eintragen der Häuser mit genauer Geometrie ist wesentlich aufwändiger als das Taggen der Hausnummern. Das Eintragen der Hausnummern ist zwar eine etwas trockenere Arbeit, jedoch mit dem Hausnummern Plugin von JOSM schnell erledigt!

LG, waldviertlerkartograph
user_5359 (2016-10-25 17:23:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-30 17:13:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:57:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:57:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
GinaroZ (2016-10-25 11:01:50+00:00): Hi, what do you mean the path has gone blue, in what software?
mavl (2019-01-31 16:57:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:57:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
bubix (2016-10-27 06:19:12+00:00): Grandissimo Piersoft domenica scorsa ero proprio li! infatti il negozio dell'usato l'ho aggiunto io...
bubix (2016-10-27 06:20:46+00:00): L'albergo è accessibile? Te lo ricordi? Così alimentiamo wheelmap!
eggie (2017-03-20 09:00:09+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 16:28:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the name of the city (same vakue like the zip code).

If you need help: You are welcome!
limes11 (2023-08-01 22:54:34+00:00): Hi,

ist zwar 7 Jahre her, aber was hat es mit 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435036495

auf sich?

Ein 30x30 Meter großes Naturschutzgebiet, welches den Namen "Am schönen Platzl" trägt? landuse=grass?

Ist das nicht ein einfache Freifläche für Wild mit Jägerstand, also am ehesten landuse=meadow oder mittlerweile bereits wieder forest?

Die Wege hier sehen auch eigenartig aus. Die hängen in der Luft. 

Schöne Grüße, Limes
limes11 (2023-08-04 15:37:56+00:00): entfernt
user_5359 (2016-10-25 16:25:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
literan (2016-10-25 10:32:15+00:00): вы зачем-то лес в дорожку превратили, в name вместо названия какие-то описания пишете. Откатываю.
kreuzschnabel (2017-07-10 21:59:01+00:00): Ich vermute, Relation 6666978 soll das Rechtsabbiegen vorschreiben, außer für psv, der darf auch links. 
Da aber der nach links führende Way als to in der Relation ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6666978/history
bedeutet es für Router das Gegenteil :)

Ich will’s aber nicht ohne Ortskenntnis ändern. Entweder änderst du den Typ in no_left_turn oder nimmst den nach rechts führenden Way ins from. Beides funktioniert. Aber so gibt es heftige Routingfehler. Danke :)
kreuzschnabel (2017-07-10 21:59:45+00:00): sorry, ... „nimmst den nach rechts führenden Way ins _to_“ sollte das natürlich heißen.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 16:24:37+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
احمد ابو سجاد (2021-12-06 16:39:45+00:00): جيد جدا
EneaSuper (2016-10-25 11:38:34+00:00): Di che cosa si tratta? :o
freebeer (2019-08-12 03:59:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73254561 where the changeset comment is: revert gibberish changeset
muzirian (2017-05-03 10:08:09+00:00): hi can you please explain what knowledge as source means?
The road is pretty clear on the imagery but the the way doesnt follow it.
Владимир К (2016-10-25 11:08:57+00:00): не нужно путать английское и русское названия
chnav (2016-10-26 07:45:52+00:00): Здравствуйте, у нас не принято удалять объекты. Если здание или проулок есть, но их форма не соответствует реальности - их надо исправить, не удалять т.к. удаляется вся история и старые теги. Лучше сразу привыкнуть делать правильно.
user_5359 (2016-10-25 16:18:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your entry please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage .
user_5359 (2016-10-25 16:13:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-25 16:00:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
literan (2016-10-25 11:05:43+00:00): вы спутали OSM с Викимапией )) Там все текстом пишется, а в OSM задается тегами. и area=yes не нужен. Я поправлю здесь
LiFo (2016-10-28 21:11:44+00:00): Hotel Tórshavn has allredy a node
why create a new one ?
LiFo (2016-10-28 21:12:50+00:00): and Nr12 juce bar location is way off
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:57:58+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
PT-53 (2016-10-28 08:23:41+00:00): Hallo Gerold,
im OSM-Inspector wird für das Gebäude # 449345047 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449345047 - eine Fehlermeldung "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt. Kümmerst Du Dich darum ?

Eigentlich sind das 3 Gebäude, wie man in Maps4BW gut sehen kann. Auch fehlern noch die korrekten Adressen für eine Navigation dorthin. Watt ist kein Straßennamen sondern der Name des Ortsteiles. Der Straßennamen sollte gelöscht und für die Gebäude-Adressen sollte addr:place verwendet werden.
 Ich empfehle einen Umstieg zu JOSM.
PT-53 (2016-11-06 12:35:18+00:00): Hallo Gerold,
nachdem Du bisher nicht reagiert hast, habe ich das fehlerhafte Gebäude heute gelöscht und neu - korrekt - eingezeichnet
Minh Nguyen (2016-11-20 04:52:48+00:00): This changeset added the wrong Wikidata entity for Yên Bình. Q8052180 is for a district (huyện), whereas Q10837974 is for that district’s capital town (thị trấn). I’ve clarified the Wikidata entities and also corrected the wikidata tag in changeset 43814653.
nammala (2016-11-21 04:21:10+00:00): Thanks Minh Nguyen for clarifying and correcting it
Hjart (2016-10-25 11:25:42+00:00): Hej. Jeg bemærkede dine ændringer og har efterfølgende tilladt mig at justere nogle af sporene efter de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava heatmaps jeg kan se. Jeg formoder de stadig er rimeligt aktuelle?
Mark Læssøe (2016-10-25 13:17:03+00:00): Ja heat map burde passe :-)
user_5359 (2016-10-25 17:56:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:54:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

And please notice: You are NOT a church!
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:52:43+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:49:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:59:18+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:47:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
philippec (2021-11-21 15:07:45+00:00): Erembodegem kerk, staan die containers voor oude kleren nog juist ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4463210906
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=435907564819090&lat=50.920453478283&lng=4.0576152645455&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.395435218895585&y=0.5236943814830021&zoom=0.3869303525365433
philippec (2021-11-21 15:11:19+00:00): Ik heb tussen de Imgur foto's kunnen vinden dat ze vroeger op de door u aangeduide plaats gestaan hebben.
urbalazs (2022-08-27 07:57:58+00:00): A farkas János út és a Mátrai Sándor utca mi alapján lett elnevezve? A Siófok Körzeti Földhivatal szerint ezek a szakaszok is a Vasúti sorhoz tartoznak (hrsz: 836).
Térképszerkesztő (2022-09-22 15:20:32+00:00): Szia! Nem magamtól találtam ki, de mivel nem sikerült visszakövetnem a forrást és hitelt érdemlően bizonyítani az eredetét, így maradt az átnevezés Vasúti sorra. Köszi az észrevételt!
BharataHS (2016-10-25 11:14:42+00:00): Sorry for the incorrect changeset comment. The proper changeset comment is "Added wikidata tag to places"
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:43:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
BharataHS (2016-10-25 11:15:19+00:00): Sorry for the incorrect changeset comment. The proper changeset comment is "Added wikidata tag to places"
BharataHS (2016-10-25 11:16:06+00:00): Sorry for the incorrect changeset comment. The proper changeset comment is "Added wikidata tag to places"
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:42:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
saikabhi (2016-10-25 11:25:02+00:00): Wrong comment. Comment is "adding wikidata"
saikabhi (2016-10-25 11:18:19+00:00): Wrong comment: "Adding wikidata" is the right comment
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:41:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
saikabhi (2016-10-25 11:23:33+00:00): Wrong comment. Comment is "Adding wikidata"
ianlopez1115 (2016-10-25 11:29:01+00:00): Additional note: housenumbers added based on photos, on-the-ground survey and extrapolation while other POIs added are based on photos and extrapolation
mueschel (2016-10-30 12:47:36+00:00): Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47421778
I found the tag access:snow=destination on this way, which is not used anywhere else. 
What do you think about  this tag instead?
vehicle:conditional = destination @ snow
This uses the common conditional tagging. Could you confirm whether it is general access, including foot and horse or for vehicles only?

Cheers, Jan
Max1234-ITA (2016-10-30 22:47:01+00:00): 
Hi Jan,

about way 47421778: it's a narrow road, running down a hill with a quite steep slope: in case of snow, it becomes very dangerous for circulation.

The dangerous part begins only out of the village of Cella, so at the beginning of the road there's a sign indicating that access is reserved, in case of snow, only to people living in that street 

According to the Italian Law of the Road, the used sign (Blank white disc with red border) forbids access to all vehicles, motor-, man- and animal-powered. Only pedestrians are allowed to transit (and in this case, only resident' vehicles).

Under the circular sign are the writings (translation from Italian):
_______________________________
MUNICIPAL ROAD 'CELLA'
Except residents
Alternate route: please use Provincial Road (which is SP125 from Montalto Pavese)
______________________________

When I mapped this road I didn't think to the combination you propose: in effect it uses standard OSM tagging, and I think I'll adopt it too.
Thanks for writing!

Regards,
Massimo
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:31:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you the other Chic-fil-A objects on OSM? http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/jCa
user_5359 (2016-10-25 15:17:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
mueschel (2016-10-26 19:22:38+00:00): Hi Bogdan,
could you check the node again? Something went wrong there with the tagging, most likely a copy-and-paste error (or you like your name very much ;-) )

Btw, it's best to use the common syntax for opening_hours, this can be read automatically by software: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Cheers, Jan
Vincent de Phily (2016-10-25 12:50:29+00:00): Congrats on your first OSM edit :)

It seems that you removed more than you intended however: this building may not be used by Quinn anymore, but it is still a building=warehouse (unless it's been demolished, in which case you'd want to delete the way completely, not just its tags).

I'll let you re-add the building tag. Do you happen to know what the building is now used for ?
SugarP (2016-10-25 13:00:36+00:00): Thanks Vincent, Ive added the Warehouse tag back in. Im afraid I dont know what the warehouse is now used for I just know that it's not used by Quinn Radiators or Quinn Glass as these companies dont exist anymore.
iWowik (2016-10-31 09:02:46+00:00): тест