piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SK53 (2015-01-21 11:43:48+00:00): This edit also seriously misinterprets the aerial imagery. The very name "Terrace" in this part of Britain suggests a street not accessible by cars. The N half of what is labelled Gladstone Street looks very like this: there is an obvious change in surface on aerial photos, and on the S half there is an obvious barrier, so this is clearly incorrectly mapped with highway=residential. The mapping prior to this edit reflected what is visible in aerial imagery much better.

It's a real shame that MapBox are keeping 'issues' private when making them available to local mappers is likely to result in a better map for all.
ediyes (2015-01-26 22:06:28+00:00): SomeoneElse, SK53 -

You're right, in fact Gladstone Street does not at all seem to connect with Gladstone Terrace and I asked my colleague @Rub21 to revert the changeset which he has done earlier today: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28417621

Thank you for the feedback and sorry for the mistaken edit.
lxbarth (2015-01-26 22:15:15+00:00): Thanks for all the feedback.

> It's a real shame that MapBox are keeping 'issues' private when making them available to local mappers is likely to result in a better map for all.

SK53 - this edit goes actually back to to-fix http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/?error=unconnected_minor1 and not to a map user feedback.

That said, I'm keen to share any worthwhile feedback that we receive with the OSM community. We're just not there yet.

Here's me counting on your patience ;-)
lxbarth (2015-02-26 10:01:02+00:00): By the way, we are placing all customer feedback as notes on OSM now. We do not pass on any feedback directly as the noise to signal ratio is too high and I am also not 100 % comfortable to post something publicly that people may submit assuming a private channel.

I hope it's useful feedback, we're taking our first steps here.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-27 00:12:37+00:00): @lxbarth thanks - that'd be really useful (and also great that you filter out the non-OSM-specific stuff, like people who's GPSs obviously aren't working or are actually just complaining about an app that your maps are embedded in.
SomeoneElse (2015-04-09 13:07:52+00:00): Just for info - for the continuation of the "Gladstone Terrace" story see the discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30036375 .
Mike Baggaley (2015-08-28 08:46:23+00:00): HI, I do not believe numbers  such as 864, 874 are valid road names. I would expect these numbers should be in the local_ref field ( as they are no national references).

Regards,
Mike
eggie (2019-11-10 16:55:50+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Hjart (2015-06-07 08:03:46+00:00): Er det østlige ben af Kirstinesmindevej hvor det munder ud i Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard virkelig ikke ensrettet?
Erik Klausen (2015-06-07 08:17:50+00:00): Sandsynligvis, eller det vestlige ben er nedlagt. Jeg kommer forbi i morgen mandag.
Regent_64 (2016-02-10 20:30:03+00:00): opraveno
literan (2015-01-20 10:04:56+00:00): Вы что-то спутали. Посмотрите на свежие панорамы на http://eatlas.mos.ru/ - с юга на север после Петровского пассажа идет стройка ресторана (это как раз открывшийся Les Artists), потом проезд в арку, потом хинкальная, потом еще один проезд в арку (он не отражен на карте), потом ресторан Романов на первом этаже отеля Петр I. 

Я откачу вашу правку, у вас хинкальные задвоились
Haserbaba (2015-01-20 10:28:20+00:00): Привет. Я вчера там шел. Правил с приложения. Да, наверное ошибся, не разглядев ресторан Романов и поправил его на Хинкальную
literan (2015-01-20 10:38:03+00:00): Ничего страшного! я просто в этой хинкальной бываю, и места эти хорошо помню ;-)
tyr_asd (2015-03-15 06:38:18+00:00): Wieso hast du die Hausnummer Signat 197 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2755940148) nicht frisch gleich gelöscht, wenns die nicht mehr gibt?
4rch (2015-03-01 16:50:48+00:00): Hi Wesam5588, before you import something to OpenStreetMap you have to contact the community and follow the import guidelines [1]. As it seems that you didn't follow the import guidelines I've asked the Data Working Group to remove this import.
The tags which you've uploaded are redundant and invalid.

Best regards, Arch
emacsen (2015-01-20 12:17:38+00:00): Hi  jdmuell!

Welcome to the OpenStreetMap Project! I can see this is one of your first contributions. Congratulations on making your first edit.

Unfortunately, I have a number of questions or concerns about this changeset.

First, the geographic region that it covers is huge, which makes it a bit difficult to examine, but that issue aside, I'm looking at a few examples of objects you've created.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323127574

You've drawn out this water body. You say it's a reservoir. How do you know?

And then https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323127583

The name tag is used for names of objects, so "On stream dam?", is probably wrong. Again, I don't know how you know it's a reservoir rather than a lake.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323127559

The name tag, again, is used for the name of an object.  The tags for baseball fields are leisure=pitch and sport=baseball.

I'm not sure if those tags are built into the web editor (iD) or not, but if not, you can check our wiki for this information: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Looking at this road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323127586

Are you sure this is an unclassified road? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

Yes, it appears unpaved from the imagery, but it also appears to have houses along it. That makes me think it's probably not unclassified, but maybe just a tertiary road.

You have a stream here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323127584

I'm not sure the source for this. It doesn't appear visible on the Bing imagery.

And you've set an elevation tag on it. We don't usually set an elevation tag on objects unless the elevation is notable, such as on the tops of mountains:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele

And this object:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323127588

Is this a housing division or something? If so, you probably want to be using the neighbourhood tag: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Neighbourhood

I'm sorry to come at you with all these tags, many of which may not have been present in your editor, but we just want your changes to work with the rest of the map, so things need to be tagged in a relatively similar/consistent way.

Do you think we can work together to fix this edit up?
jdmuell (2015-01-20 22:23:41+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for my lack of conformity, please allow me to explain. You are correct to assume I am new; these edits were me playing around in OSM (trying to learn) as part of a volunteering event at my university. I am a 4th year undergraduate in Agricultural Engineering with a focus in land and water resources. This semester I have 19 credits and 3 student organization officer positions and therefore cannot devote the time needed to qualitatively correct every mistake you have listed to me. I invite you to correct them yourself. 

I mapped the region in Ghana as a tool for myself to analyze the village for a project I am involved in with my chapter of Engineers Without Borders. I am interested in using OSM as a tool for committee members I oversee to use for a site selection project, but seeing as it is stricter than I understood, I will certainly be more careful.

My answer to nearly all your questions is that I do not know what these things actually are; I made speculations based on the satellite imagery to try and understand the village which I have not personally visited for assessment. My question to you is: should I not be using OSM without being able to confirm the identity of the objects I mark by living in the area? This is not consistent with what I was taught at the event which introduced me to OSM. Let me clarify: I don't claim to know anything about OSM from 2 hours of introduction and certainly defer to your judgement. I have no intention of altering the integrity of OSM.

I do apologize for my annoyed tone and I hope we can understand our respective interests in this matter and come to a productive resolution.

Regards,

Jordan
emacsen (2015-01-20 22:39:53+00:00): Jordan,

In regards to strictness, if you don't have any idea what something is, then you should find out. Ideally you should be manually surveying an area to determine what something is, but if you can't, then you can certainly use allowed sources and imagery, but in this case you seem to have speculated in many cases. As for tagging- while not strict per se, we do expect that people would tag things with existing tags if they can, and then if they need to use tags that go beyond that, do so.

As for asking me to fix your edits- if you'd only made a few changes, I might go ahead and do this, but you have 25 ways here, each of which I would have to examine. I'd hope that if you plan on being participatory in the project that you'd work with me in identifying these problems and correcting them. 

Otherwise, if you aren't going to fix it, then we have to hope some else will, or just go ahead and revert this changeset- something I'm sure you'd like to avoid.

Since you mentioned wanting to use OSM for other projects, I'm hoping that you'll start off by doing this, and thereby show your good will.
jdmuell (2015-01-23 02:41:52+00:00): I am comfortable with the changeset being reverted if necessary. I do not have the skills or time to qualitatively do as you ask, despite my desire to. I recognize my mislabeling and would also state that in situations where I make the assumption that something is a reservoir, I can see what appears to be a dam at the end. I am also aware of areas that are rainy season streams in Ghana because I am in contact with people who have been there.
emacsen (2015-01-23 14:08:37+00:00): It's really a shame that you say you have the time to add these objects to OSM but not the time to fix some mistakes.

I hope that when you decide to contribute in the future, you'll work with folks to make your edits, which are generally of high quality, conform with the tagging that others are using.

I'm going to go ahead and spend some time this weekend trying to go through this changeset and see what's easily fixable.
emacsen (2015-02-02 14:29:22+00:00): I ultimately didn't have the time to go through this and fix all the errors and my next week looks equally bad, so I'm just going to go ahead and revert his changeset, which is a real shame because there was some good work mixed in with the not-as-good stuff.
nazgul5 (2015-01-20 07:15:06+00:00): Будинки вже містили адресну інформацію, явне прописування city, street для кожного об'єкту зайве.
http://i.imgur.com/e7FLekn.png
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Relation:associatedStreet
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:05:37+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323137314,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323139303,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323139796
have no tags. What are they?
Jean Passepartout (2015-02-06 21:45:23+00:00): Using Keep Right! this way, Avenida Universitaria (323142896, v1) is overlapping another copy of  Avenida Universitaria, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55490293.

Should the attributes and relations be merged and then remove the newer one?
SomeoneElse (2015-01-21 11:37:26+00:00): In this case, did you contact the previous mapper to explain what you'd done?  Fixing the data's all very well but if mappers don't know tat they're supposed to join footpaths to roads, they won't.  It's important to communicate with other mappers and work together.
ediyes (2015-11-16 15:49:53+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse,
I sent a comment to DaveF to explain why I joined the streets.
Thanks.
naoliv (2015-01-19 21:46:10+00:00): Changesets 28253893 28253889 28253883 28253860 28253853 28253840 28253837 28253831 28253821 28253787 28253782 28253775 28253767 28253749 28253740 28253729 28253709 28254094 28254055 28254032 28254004 28253986 28253980 28253931 28253917 28253911... 😒
robert (2015-01-19 23:16:22+00:00): I made a small fix to this in my changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28265824

It's important to ensure the points where ways are *traversible* between are actually *connected*, otherwise software that uses OSM can't do clever things like routing across them. In the web editor (iD), nodes should actually feel like they "snap" to another road when they're actually connected. Here, I connected the Upper Park end of your Albion Park/Upper Park footway.

Good start anyway. Footways and cut-throughs are really useful things to add to OSM.
abbafei (2015-07-27 16:58:28+00:00): It seems you set the width on Ohio River Trail in this changeset to 0. Is this an error, or does the trail not exist in real life yet, or is the trail actually infinitely narrow? :-)
Uniplex (2015-07-28 16:39:53+00:00): Yes, this was an error and I will fix it.
abbafei (2015-07-29 16:23:50+00:00): Thank you :-)
ChehrehBargi (2019-12-03 06:55:06+00:00): با سلام برای کوچه های بی نام، اسم محله را نام گذاری نکنید.
ثبت اسامی نقشه بر اساس نام محلی خیابان ها (مانند میدان ایثار که تابلو شهرداری نام دیگری گذاشته) و فعلی (تابلو شهرداری) می باشد. برای کوچه هایی که کلا اسمی ندارند اسامی دلخواه نمی گذاریم.
با سپاس از ویرایش و توجهتان به ثبت صحیح
SomeoneElse (2015-01-21 23:03:36+00:00): In cases such as this (where someone's grabbed something in one continent and moved it somehere else) it might be easier to do I straight revert and then re-add the new stuff that they were trying to add (or get them to).  It's also probably quicker than doing it manually.  As it stands there are still a lot of things deleted at the Azerbaijan end of this changeset.

Also, it might help to let them know that something's gone a bit wrong in their original changeset, so that they can avoid it happening again.
cronoser (2025-03-06 19:49:10+00:00): Hello, I have read now :-(, sorry for the delay. I learn to revert several years ago, thank you for the advise.
hobbesvsboyle (2021-11-28 15:16:08+00:00): I noticed there is a note about the name "Derrikson's Plat" and it looks like you were the one to originally add the name. Would you mind taking a look? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2681785
hobbesvsboyle (2022-03-23 17:08:11+00:00): Checking in about this again. The discussion on the note is leaning toward removing the name, but would be great to hear from you.
MidwestMapGeek (2022-11-26 18:29:51+00:00): Apologies for not replying; I'm really bad with emails and missed these two comments.

I have no issues with that being removed. I used to look at plats a lot, as some reflect neighborhood names that are still in use now, but a fair amount of them don't and as a result I've pretty much stopped looking at them.
ianlopez1115 (2016-01-27 09:19:51+00:00): I was able to add the exact location of  General Homma Shrine. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36832806
muziriana (2017-06-20 10:12:37+00:00): looks like way 7703731 need further cleanup
JeSe-MX (2015-01-20 14:08:33+00:00): Hay que tener cuidado, pues muchas veces una calle segmentada esta así por que contiene relaciones.

No estoy seguro si Potlatch tiene opción de mostrar relaciones.

Una relación es una lista de segmentos que indican una ruta, área, límites u otros. Normalmente se usan para límites y rutas.
luschi (2015-03-12 17:02:32+00:00): Du hast hier einige Hotels und Pensionen eingezeichnet mit den Angaben der Sterne im name=... hierfür gibt es stars=...
ebenso gehört unter website=... nicht die E-Mail(dafür gibt es email=...) sondern der Link zur Homepage.
des weiteren ist es nicht notwendig die Hausnummer doppelt zu mappen(wie in diesem Changeset).
tyr_asd (2015-03-12 20:33:55+00:00): naja, Hausnummern doppelt finde ich persönlich eigentlich gar nicht so schlimm. Besser doppelt als gar nicht. Bei den restlichen Punkten muss ich luschi aber recht geben!
Athalis (2017-09-13 22:21:46+00:00): I reverted this spam entry in 52021918
Supaplex (2015-01-20 17:49:55+00:00): 一般學校預定地不會直接標成amenity=school，而是標proposed:amenity=school，來區別運作中的學校和計畫中的學校。可以參考OSM Wiki上life cycle的頁面 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts
aceman444 (2015-01-20 16:54:06+00:00): Dobry den, to spojenie budovy a chodnika okolo budovy v bode 305935705 nebude dobry napad, lebo ste zdeformovali budovu. Skuste to opravit. Dakujem.
Clira14 (2015-01-21 10:05:44+00:00): Zdravim, pokusila som sa s tym nieco urobit. Teraz je bytovka uz rovna..,
aceman444 (2015-01-21 19:28:38+00:00): Dakujem, hned je to lepsie:). Este som to tam trochu opravil, mozete pozriet. Dal som tunnel=building_passage a je len presne tam kde sa krizuje s budovou, nie mimo. A na mosty sa dava este layer=1 ak su nad inymi objektami, napr. tu nad cestou, ktora je tam okolo domu (z juhu).
ij_ (2015-01-21 11:38:31+00:00): Taisit unohtaa old_name:n ja :fi/:sv variaatiot, sekä subway_entrance tms. nodejen nimet.
perusluku (2015-01-21 13:20:10+00:00): korjattu tietääkseni kaikki nyt :)
5m4u9 (2015-01-21 08:04:39+00:00): revertí los cambios hechos acá porque borraste la relación que armaba la plaza, con mucho cuidado al hacer clic ;-)
Locopon (2015-01-21 16:12:46+00:00): Estimado. Los cambios en la plaza fueron correctos segun toda la documentacion leida y ademas se tomo como ejemplo el trabajo realizado en las plazas de Nueva York.

Los problemas actuales son que no existe comunicacion entre los caminos peatonales y las calles y eso hace que no exista ruteo posible cruzando la plaza. Todos los ruteadores te llevan por los contornos. Otro error es que justamente la via peatonal mas externa que pusieron en la plaza en realidad no existe y tampoco esta conectada a nada.

A fin de ser proactivos, me ayudaria entender lo que esperan de las ediciones en Bolivia con este ejemplo especifico, ya que me interesa que el mapa sirva para rutear autos, peatones y bicicletas y no solo como referencia de existencia de una plaza. Estoy a las ordenes y a ver como podemos apoyar mas a que los mapas este ok
5m4u9 (2015-01-22 03:26:56+00:00): El problema era que se borró el área que cubre el contorno y plaza en si http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288586921 . Al ser compleja la estructura de la plaza se opta por hacer relaciones con áreas internas. Un buen ejemplo es https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.86704/2.31520 o mejor aún de Cbba => https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-17.38818/-66.15578. Bueno saber que viste algo en NYC, conozco gente que trabajo en la importación de datos.

Correcto, la comunicación no está terminada porque no recuerdo por dónde eran los pasos y no hay imágenes claras que respalden, así que opté por dejar inconcluso hasta donde se vé vía aérea. 

Pero si existe la acera alrededor (con error en las gradas), confirma estas imágenes http://www.panoramio.com/photo/54541391.

Eso, no mapeamos para ver un mapa (aunque todos quieran uno), sino para usar en diversas y reales situaciones. Lastimosamente, la reducida cantidad de contribuidores nos limita a priorizar áreas y qué mapear. Ahora estamos potenciando Mapazonia (mapazonia.org), quizá es momento de reunirnos allí para motivar a más personas y discutir qué elementos, cómo y que hacer para tener mejores datos... quizá involucrar al municipio como se hizo en otros lugares con buenos resultados. ¿Quedamos para reunirnos?
eggie (2021-09-12 14:53:48+00:00): Beste Padvinder..

De tracks over de akkers die starten bij het boerenerf heb ik op access=private gezet.

De serviceweg eindigt momenteel gewoon in de akker zonder verdere track.
Met de fiets werd ik de akker in gestuurd.
MVG
eggie
Percherie (2015-01-24 10:56:11+00:00): Bonjour rbonnefoi,

On viens de m'informer de ta modification et je t'invite à consulter les sources que j'avais placé en note sur chacun des segments. Voici quelques principe à retenir :
1 - On ne tag pas pour le rendu ;
2 - Les axes routier qui ce croise doivent avoir un nœud en commun si ils sont au même niveau d'élévation ;
3 - Si tu souhaite conserver cette représentation, il faut IMPÉRATIVEMENT placer des restrictions de tourner sur chaque intersection, c'est pour cela que j'avais opté pour un modèle simplifié qui est plus simple à gérer pour les logiciels et limite les erreurs pour les contributeur.
4 - Fait un dernier contrôle avec un calcul de routage comme OSRM pour améliorer

Si tu souhaite revenir sur la solution précédente, fait ta demande ici ou en privé pour que je remonte les anciennes données.
rbonnefoi (2015-01-27 10:18:56+00:00): Bonjour percherie,

Merci pour tes commentaires et tes conseils.

Je dois avouer que ma proposition n'est pas parfaite, et qu'effectivement je n'ai volontairement pas créé d'intersection entre certains tracés.

Mais je pense que c'est une implémentation qui est plus représentative de la réalité que de faire converger toutes les routes au même endroit.

Mon GPS était complètement perdu à se carrefour, et me faisait faire un détour invraisemblable pour le franchir.

Indépendamment des questions de guidage informatique, je pense qu'il est visuellement (un peu) plus facile à comprendre pour un simple observateur que la solution à convergence unique.

Ceci dit, je vais rajouter des interdictions de tourner, car c'est vrai que sur OSMR, ça fait des propositions un peu bizarres, même si je ne suis pas sûr que cette fonctionnalité, assez nouvelle, soit toujours bien prise en compte par les logiciels de guidage.

A ta disposition pour en discuter si besoin.

Bonne journée,

RB
rbonnefoi (2015-01-27 10:33:26+00:00): Je viens de rajouter les interdictions de tourner, et je viens de comprendre pourquoi le guidage n'était pas bon sur OSMR : parce qu'entretemps, tu avais rajouté les intersections entre différents segments.

Honnêtement, je pense que dans ces cas, une entorse à la règle (écrite ?) de créer une intersection pour des segments à même niveau, est préférable. Car les interdictions de tourner ne sont pas affichées, et rendent les choses peu intuitives.

Et je ne suis vraiment pas sûr que cette information d'interdiction de tourner soit prise en compte par beaucoup de logiciels de routage...
Percherie (2015-01-28 04:26:40+00:00): Oui j'ai eu le même genre d'erreur avant ma modification. Peut être sur tes données était trop ancienne et date de l'époque où le carrefour n'était pas encore en étoile. 

J'utilise osmand qui gère les interdiction de tourner. Après test ça fonctionnait avec et sur d'autre simulateur en ligne. Lequel utilisé tu ? 

Je ne vois pas de quel intersection tu parle? Est ce que c'est les chemin piéton?