piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2019-07-08 15:12:32+00:00): Hello Yostina. I was reviewing this changeset and noticed the way you mapped buildings. The images are taken under  an oblique angle. It shows a building not exact from above so It seems that the roof ridge is somewhat beneath the building,  Please map them as a rectangular. (4 corners at a common building) 
best regards and keep mapping
SomeoneElse (2020-09-21 15:15:35+00:00): Hello - the imagery you have used here is quite badly offset.  You can use OS OpenData StreetView here to align both north-south and east-west.
mueschel (2019-07-14 11:05:39+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You used some uncommon "fuel" tags here. Could you revise them according to the list provided in the Wiki?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:fuel

Thanks!
SomeoneElse (2020-11-16 20:08:25+00:00): Hello,
Whatever imagery was used to add https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702240005 it seems very odd?  It doesn't match most imagery at all and doesn't match my recollection either.  OS OpenData StreetView is broadly correct here I think.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-07-07 17:49:52+00:00): Hello Haji Aslanov and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
In ths edit you managed to remove some relation roles and made some other changes that seem a little odd.  Can you explain what it was that you were trying to fix?  You may find it useful to read https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf , which explains how OSM handles situations like this where there is a dispute between which country a particular area is part of.  For the avoidance of doubt, note that Azerbaijan https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/364110 includes the disputed area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2374762 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2019-07-07 17:50:21+00:00): Hacı Aslanovu salamlayıram və OpenStreetMap-a salamlayıram!
Bəzi əlaqələr rollarını aradan qaldırmağı bacardı və bir az qəribə görünən bəzi dəyişikliklər etdi. Bunu düzəltməyə çalışdığınızın nə olduğunu izah edə bilərsinizmi? OSM-nin müəyyən bir ölkənin hansı hissəsi arasında bir mübahisə olduğu yerlərdə necə işlədiyini izah edən https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf-ni oxumaq faydalı ola bilər . Şübhə aradan qaldırılmaması üçün, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/364110 saytının https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2374762 saytına mübahisəli ərazini daxil etdiyini qeyd edin.
Hörmətlə,
OSM'nin Data İş Qrupu adından Andy Townsend.
Haji Aslanov (2019-07-07 20:40:08+00:00): Hi Andy and thank you for your message!
The change that I have made is basically to remove line specification between NKR and Azerbaijan republic as "Border" and change it to just "Line" with added description that it line of contact between Armenian forces and Azerbaijani army. Border exists only between UN recognized countries. NKR is not recognized by any country in the world.
I know that NRK in Azerbaijan includes disputed area, but I do not want it to be shown on maps like a border between 2 countries. Hope you got my point.

Regards,
Haji
SomeoneElse (2019-07-07 21:51:44+00:00): Hi Haji,
I think that there's been a bit of a misunderstanding.  On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138272532/history you've changed "boundary=administrative; admin_level=4" to just "admin_level=4".  The "boundary=administrative" part doesn't just mean a boundary between two countries, it's used for boundaries between regions within a country too.  For a bit more detail, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative in the OSM wiki.  I'm not sure how up to date the table is, but the entry for Azerbaijan at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries for Azerbaijan suggests admin_level=5 for rayon boundaries and 8 for municipalities, with 3 and 4 for special cases.  I'm seeing more admin_level=4 boundaries than taht would suggest, but "boundary=administrative" is definitely needed, though.
How regional boundaries actually get displayed is an issue for individual maps made from OSM data, not for the OSM data itself.  In the case of the default map that you see at openstreetmap.org, that rendering can be discussed at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues .  However, at zoom level 8 (which happens to be the default zoom level that this changeset shows at) it looks to me that the admin_level-2, 3 and 4 borders appear to have about the right prominence.
Best Regards,
Andy
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-07 20:54:24+00:00): Hi aapelivuorinen, welome to OSM.

Please don't map streets as areas, furthermore please add the surface=asphalt tag to the existing street.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71983285

#test #failed
--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
Qitay (2019-07-09 19:33:03+00:00): Hej, faktycznie poprzednia kategoria dróg mogła być niepoprawna, ale nie jestem pewien czy zamiast service nie powinna to być droga czwartorzędna - unclassified, albo local?
maraf24 (2019-07-09 20:38:11+00:00): O którą drogę chodzi? Jeśli jest ślepa, to nie ma to praktycznego znaczenia, ale podnieść kategorię zawsze można.
Qitay (2019-07-09 20:52:47+00:00): no te drogi wcześniej były jako track, i się łączą dalej z polnymi, skoro dojazdowe nieutwardzone do domów to nie track, to wtedy chyba lepsze te lokalne albo unclassified, bo te service to mi bardziej pod jakieś mniejsze podjazdy, albo wewnętrzne dróżki pasuje
maraf24 (2019-07-10 12:01:34+00:00): unclassified nie pasuje, to dla tranzytu. Residential może by prawidłowe. Trudno mi to tu ocenić, dlatego ostrożnościowo daję service.
elgolfo (2019-07-08 15:52:40+00:00): Hi Uvi,
ich habe dein Changeset revertiert (CS 72020693 [1]) und den Gasthof als disused:amenity=restaurant getaggt. 
So könnte er bei erneuter Nutzung einfach reaktiviert werden und außerdem geht die History nicht verloren. 

Viele Grüße
Moritz

[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72020693
uvi (2019-07-08 17:37:30+00:00): Ich stand vergangene Woche dort vor verschlossenen Türen. Auch unter www.prierosonline.de/dahme/essen-und-trinken.html ist zu lesen, dass das Restaurant dauerhaft geschlossen ist. Aber so ist es auch in Ordnung!
Gruß Uwe
EinKonstanzer (2019-07-08 20:37:20+00:00): Siehe Diskussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62359220
Rieszj (2019-07-07 14:48:41+00:00): A csomag címkét elrontottam. Badacsonytomaj helyett Pesterzsébet.
FoodPanda_Dyllan (2020-07-07 05:03:42+00:00): Hello, there is a duplicate apartment building in this area. One of those are from your edits and it cannot be modified. Can you please edit it and trace the building’s shape with the satellite imagery, thanks.
j numminen (2019-07-07 15:05:52+00:00): Ja "jote vaidan" pitäisi tietysti olla "joten vaihdan".
korolenok (2019-07-11 13:49:16+00:00): Why on buildings the personal information is added? Is it legit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71984759
SomeoneElse (2022-06-26 23:17:14+00:00): Hello,
Esri imagery is offset here. You can tell which is correct by looking at OS OpenData StreetView and OS OpenMap Local, and seeing that that is aligned well to Bing, but not Esri.
Best Regards,
Andy
vkmarhy (2022-06-27 11:57:04+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs.
I have made the necessary corrections in the changeset #122906383 as per the Bing aerial imagery. I really appreciate the feedback provided. 
I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
vkmarhy
parukhin (2019-07-23 20:13:12+00:00): Здравствуйте, lenusya.
Позвольте поинтересоваться откуда черпаете адресную информацию, которую вносите в OSM? 
Хочу также заметить, что нет необходимости добавлять на здания тег addr:city=Архангельск, достаточно полигона с которого наследуется эта информация.

-- 
Николай
parukhin (2019-07-23 20:20:04+00:00): Да, и ещё, если удаляете или рисуете здание, не забывайте посмотреть на других снимках, чтобы не "снести" построенное или "построить" снесённое. Снимки Maxar (Digital Globe) более актуальны, чем Bing.
Famlam (2019-07-07 15:41:27+00:00): Bron staat onjuist, had moeten zijn: Osmose & sattelietbeelden (&logica)
woodpeck (2019-07-07 21:47:04+00:00): This is an automated edit that needs to follow the automated edit guidelines, especially: discuss beforehand & document properly.
woodpeck (2019-07-07 21:47:47+00:00): Äh sorry, das ist ein automatischer/mechanischer Edit, der lt. Richtlinien vor der Ausführung diskutiert werden muss und ausserdem auch dokumentiert werden sollte.
wambacher (2019-07-07 22:45:53+00:00): ok, ist grenzwertig.

Ich bin die Str allerdings alle händisch einzeln  durchgegangen und habe i.d.R passende Straßenstücke und Adressen mit richtiger Schreibweise gefunden.

Hab das allerdings nicht als mech. edit angesehen.
ligfietser (2019-08-11 17:47:33+00:00): Er ligt inmiddels een bruggetje over de greppel. Heb het aangepast.
multimodaal (2019-08-11 17:55:16+00:00): Dank voor de actualisatie!  
survey:date en foto op Mapillary zouden nog mooie aanvullingen kunnen zijn, gelet op de opeenvolgende veranderingen hier. 

Mapillary geeft nu al aardig beeld van de geschiedenis..
ligfietser (2019-08-11 21:54:01+00:00): Mapillay zal ik tzt uploaden
user_5359 (2019-07-07 18:12:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please do not add eight house numbers to a node.
mikesimps (2019-07-07 21:00:53+00:00): Thanks for that feedback. Those numbers are 8 separate units just in the bottom quarter of that building 4 per floor. Is it appropriate to stack nodes on top of each other?
user_5359 (2019-07-08 03:24:04+00:00): Yes, you can do that. There is also the key level (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level)
BCNorwich (2019-07-07 17:38:48+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think at least some of the surface is asphalt.

Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2019-07-07 17:39:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your entry because every aerial image showsa residential building there.
abrensch (2019-07-15 21:27:39+00:00): hallo da-sch,

was ist das denn für eine Lücke hier:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.802707&mlon=12.028889#map=19/53.802707/12.028889&layers=N
freebeer (2019-07-17 03:02:48+00:00): moin moin,

it looks like you managed to grab a sidewalk in this changeset, pulling it out of position and bending maybe a dozen attached ways, as can be seen at the very top of this at https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=71987010 .

is this something you can easily fix in josm?

thanks
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 19:30:37+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86060722
jmapb (2019-07-20 16:33:47+00:00): Hi tylerchill, can you clarify what's happening in this changeset? Seems you deleted a lane from the Queens-Midtown Tunnel -- was there an extra lane mapped separately? I don't remember seeing one so I'm a little confused.

Also you deleted a construction landuse and a lot of address nodes -- I wonder if these may have been deleted by accident while working on the tunnel and LIE?

Thanks, Jason
user_385682 (2019-07-20 17:01:11+00:00): Jason 

I went on these assumptions. 

The tunnel was originally showing 4 tubes when there are only two.  Similar to a divided highway you indicate each way not each individual driving lane. 

From what I understand a large building itself is assigned one address of many possible which is usually the mailing address and is posted on the building.  That should be indicated in the area designated building. Retail and others in the building are indicated by points and have their own addresses.  That would reflect what people see on the ground.  Should a pizza place close for example that point would be deleted but the building that housed it remains.  Any unused addresses shd not be posted as that would not reflect what a user sees. 

I did remove the construction because the tunnel was attached to everything. That I’ll replace that.
jmapb (2019-07-20 18:24:05+00:00): Many buildings aren't that simple -- there's not necessarily a single "main" address.

Buildings that have only one address should be tagged with that address directly on the building area. Buildings with multiple addresses generally shouldn't get address tags on the building, but rather have their addresses indicated by address nodes placed inside the area (preferably near the entrance in question.) This is the standard implemented during the 2013 NYC building footprint and address import, and mappers here generally follow it.

These things are *not* well documented, so it's not surprising to find other approaches in use. And of course the imported data can be improved by survey. But you've left these buildings without any addresses at all, which isn't ideal.

For now I've restored the deleted address nodes (and the construction site) with changeset 72466673.

Regarding your work on the tunnel, it's great as far as I know. I hadn't noticed that the extra lane was there, and I don't know why it would have been mapped separately. (Maybe it had different restrictions at one point? You might want to discuss it with "rdnaskela23", the mapper who originally added it last year.)  But please describe these sorts of major changes to the road network in your changeset comments so your fellow mappers will understand what you're doing and why.

Feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions -- I'm not the most experienced mapper in NYC but I'm one of the more active ones at the moment.

Thanks for your work and happy mapping, J
user_385682 (2019-07-20 23:09:32+00:00): Ok one last point.  Long Island City is booming and did not exist as it is in 2013.  Real Estate Developers have stepped in to the area on OSM with their marketing names for buildings.  Not the buildings real address. If OSM is an open source tool then these broker babble names should be deleted and replaced with a real address someone would use to actually find the place and get mail there.  If not me then someone should audit these commercial distortions
jmapb (2019-07-21 18:50:19+00:00): Can you give an example?

Development's been pretty crazy in my neighborhood too -- it seemed like for a while I was demolishing little buildings and adding big construction sites every week. But I've never seen any trace of the developers themselves tagging the new buildings on OSM. They're less savy down in Brooklyn I guess.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 19:30:32+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86060722
Leo Slager (2019-07-07 22:19:58+00:00): probeer concreet te omschrijven wat je toevoegt/wijzigt.
In dit geval:
"estate_agent" toegevoegd
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 19:30:30+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86060722
SomeoneElse (2019-07-07 18:14:14+00:00): Hello EliziR,
It would help other mappers greatly if you could use more meaningful changeset comments than simply "Fixing".  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information.
Best Regards,
Andy
majkaz (2019-07-08 07:47:39+00:00): Ahoj. Díky za změny. 
Pozor ale na to, že většina těch značek neodpovídá, a iD ten český překlad nemá vždy úplně dobře, resp. jasně. Bohužel, pokud ho budeš používat, je nutné zkoumat wiki u jednotlivých značek.
Navíc tě navádí tam dát všude název, což taky není správně. Jméno se dává jen tam, kde je to opravdu pojmenované, ostatní by mělo být v description, případně vyřešené jinou značkou.
Shelter je pro místa, kde se můžou schovat lidi - myšleno v podstatě kdokoli bude nablízku, přístřešek pro úschovu věcí je building=shed, případně building=roof (otevřené strany). Skupina amenity jsou služby - takže amenity=storage_rental znamená, že si tam můžu přijít a pronajmout skladovací prostor. Není to sklad vlastního materiálu, ten bych taky nechala jen jako budovu s popisem v description.  Pokud je to uzavřené, a použiješ tyhle značky, je třeba ještě přidat access=private, jinak tam "zveš" lidi zvenku. Totéž na cesty a pěšiny - pokud neomezíš přístup jako soukromý, říkáš, že se tudy může courat kdokoli :)
Ropino (2022-09-21 12:15:00+00:00): Hallo,
"barrier=Durchfahrt_verboten" -> was soll das für eine Barriere sein?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier
Irgendwelche Beschränkungen (für Fahrzeuge/Personen etc.) werden über "access" abgebildet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
VG
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 19:30:26+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86060722
coffe pluss (2019-07-23 19:00:44+00:00): Wow
maraf24 (2019-07-17 09:14:34+00:00): Nie, to są wskazania iD. 
I niektóre bywają błędne lub zbędne.
archie (2019-10-04 22:54:20+00:00): Varför bicycle=no här när vägen är taggad som footway?
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-07 20:50:51+00:00): #test #passed

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
maraf24 (2019-07-17 09:15:32+00:00): Komentarz zmian niepokrywa się z dokonanymi zmianami.
user_5359 (2019-07-07 18:37:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool for a better description of the school.
Leo Slager (2019-07-07 22:18:13+00:00): mooi stukje werk
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 19:30:23+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86060722
viloan (2019-07-07 18:59:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-07 01:10:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79270027 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some mechanical edits that included Cafe Rio, where the mechanically added values may be incorrect, where other mappers haven't touched the objects since.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72537137 for details
Glassman (2019-07-07 22:06:42+00:00): Tip: We use full spellings for street addresses. Reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating.

Everything else looks great.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71989914
jaap de vries (2019-07-19 07:23:39+00:00): Fijn dat je de rotonde op de kaart hebt gezet, wist je dat er een note daarvan was? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1753291 Ik het het fijn gevonden als je daar een reactie had achter gelaten.
A67-A67 (2019-07-19 12:45:21+00:00): Gedaan gedaan!

Excuses voor de opmerking. Ik dacht dat ik daarop had gereageerd, maar dat was ik blijkbaar vergeten. Ik had hem namelijk wel gezien.
Leo Slager (2019-07-07 22:11:19+00:00): Een speeltuin(tje) krijgt als tag:
leisure=playground.
Dan verschijnt ook het bijbehorende symbool op de kaart.
Zie ook:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/SymbolsTab
ik verbeter het even.
PaulV62 (2019-07-07 22:21:04+00:00): Dank je, ik kon hem niet vinden.
DaveF (2020-09-28 00:01:24+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702295385#map=18/57.44820/-4.22547

Are those service roads here or is it a recreation ground?
Dimacn (2019-07-18 19:41:35+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляете покемономусор на карту. Ваши правки будут отменены.
tudacs (2019-07-08 13:15:00+00:00): Hallo Jannes,

2 Bitten hätte ich:
a) Verwende bitte aussagekräftige Changeset-Kommentare! Du hast einige Changesets abgegeben, die den sehr generischen (und räumlich falschen) Kommentar "Änderungen in Darmstadt-Dieburg" tragen.

b) Die Baustelle in der Heidelberger einzutragen ist sehr umsichtig und nett -- allerdings sind die construction-Tags in OSM eher für langfristige bzw. (zusammen mit proposed und planned) für angedachte Baustellen gedacht. Der BER Beispielsweise wäre 'construction' ;).

Wenn nun gerade jemand für sein Navigationsgerät die OSM Daten zieht, dann fehlt ihr/ihm die Heidelberger, die aber ja geplant Ende des Sommers wieder vorhanden ist.

Die OSM stellt idR den langlebigen 'Soll'-Zustand dar, um für alle Beteiligten adäquat nutzbar zu sein :).

Ich möchte dich daher bitten, die Heidelberger wieder in den Ursprungszustand zu versetzen.

Danke und Grüße
tudacs.
Sosha1996 (2019-07-09 12:07:29+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «خشکرود» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
viloan (2019-07-07 20:11:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
james_1000 (2019-07-08 12:58:34+00:00): Opa, obrigado.
Não se preocupe, estou alterando apenas o que tenho certeza pois conheço a região.
Quando as rotas estarão disponíveis?