piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mistergoodnight (2019-01-05 17:57:43+00:00): Can you name the source for the new street name "Franz-Burckhardt-Strasse"?
martin0203 (2019-01-10 19:48:47+00:00): http://stadtplan.winterthur.ch/
mueschel (2019-01-07 09:36:36+00:00): Hi,
the key "maxspeed:authorised_vehicles" is not used in other places. I would opt for a common "conditional" tag like
maxspeed:conditional = 250 @ "authorized vehicles only"

Cheers, Jan
Firefishy (2019-01-13 10:52:44+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66270554
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 20:04:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3377924

Can you look at this note? Maybe you can help with it even if plenty of time since the edit (if not - then I wish you a happy mapping!)
eggie (2019-01-05 19:02:40+00:00): Dag Caffo.. Op de meest recente luchtfoto is niets te zien van asfalt wandelpaden door de tuinen van de woningen. 
Wat is je bron in deze?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-05 20:10:43+00:00): Wellicht heb je ook last dat bij de laatste update van OSM in editor iD de PDOK aerial luchtfoto niet meer tevoorschijn komt in editmodus. Dan wordt het een beetje lastig mappen zonder achtergrond.
Advies .. Kijk eens naar de betere editor JOSM. Daar kun je wel kiezen voor de PDOK luchtfoto juni 2018  bij de achtergronden.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-05 18:49:41+00:00): Dag Caffo. Je "pub" bevindt zich buiten. Graag ook je commentaar aanpassen. Dat is nu steeds identiek en heeft niet te maken met je edits.
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2019-01-06 20:13:11+00:00): Dat dat allemaal restaurants zijn is uiterst onwaarschijnlijk. Bakker Bart is toch echt een shop=bakery.
pas je het zelf aan ?
caffo666 (2019-01-07 06:08:28+00:00): Halllo, bedankt voor het controleren. Het klopt dat 2 hiervan een bakkerij is. Dit was bij mij nog onbekend dat ik deze kon toevoegen. Het is inmiddels aangepast
Leo Slager (2019-01-07 08:57:34+00:00): Tip:
Even opzoeken in de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
Sergey82K (2019-02-21 11:07:45+00:00): Невже канава з Тимошівки до Тясмина повністтю пересихає?
Serhii_Kuzmenko (2019-02-21 19:44:42+00:00): Саме так. Канава в більшості часу є осушенною. Тільки в період великих дощів або по весні (коли масово тане сніг) можливе заповнення водою.
Sergey82K (2019-02-26 08:25:17+00:00): Дивно, ще кілька років тому, влітку, в селі Юрчиха струмок протікав впродовж всього літа. Дякую.
Dr Udo Brömme (2019-01-08 16:22:16+00:00): What have you changed here exactly?
OttoR (2019-01-08 16:45:33+00:00): Allignment and routes to and from the parking lot, and route to border control. Corrected crossing of buildings/roads (border controls stations). Classiffication of the roads leading to the parking lots and roads on the lots. Footways and crossings.
Ultimatum85 (2019-01-05 21:46:41+00:00): looks good
mapper999 (2019-02-10 19:31:05+00:00): Hallo Ferdinand,
bist du dir sicher, dass es hier einen Blitzer gibt? Auf einem Abschnitt ohne Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung macht das irgendwie keinen Sinn.
Ferdinand0101 (2019-02-10 20:12:18+00:00): Sofern ich mich erinnere ist dies ein Bereich mit diesen Anpassbaren Geschwindigkeitslimits tafeln
mapper999 (2019-02-10 20:23:53+00:00): Nein, hier gibt es keine anpassbaren Geschwindigkeitstafeln. Etwas weiter südlich gilt aktuell 120 wegen einer Baustelle. Mir ist beim Vorbeifahren auch kein Blitzer aufgefallen, ich würde vorschlagen das Ding wieder zu löschen.
chris2map (2019-01-06 08:47:42+00:00): Korrekte Änderungssatz-Beschreibung lautet:
"updated buildings, added parking, changed driveways."
Quelle: "user-notes and Esri Aerial Imagery."

JOSM hat mal wieder die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes nicht übernommen und erst dem nächsten Änderungssatz zugeordnet.
(JOSM assigned wrong changeset title).
chris2map (2019-01-06 08:42:31+00:00): Korrekte Änderungssatz-Beschreibung lautet:
"connected added street and cycleway."

JOSM hat mal wieder die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes nicht übernommen und erst dem nächsten Änderungssatz zugeordnet.
(JOSM assigned wrong changeset title).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-06 10:56:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66066625 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Canada.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2424
antiviro (2019-01-05 19:15:38+00:00): Range perimeter is an approximation, as the group does not have a detailed map available. More accurate perimeter will require going on location when the range is not active.
chris2map (2019-01-06 08:45:05+00:00): Korrekte Änderungssatz-Beschreibung lautet:
"access=no to bridge."
Quelle: "user-note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1233825"

JOSM hat mal wieder die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes nicht übernommen und erst dem nächsten Änderungssatz zugeordnet.
(JOSM assigned wrong changeset title).
utack (2019-01-05 22:57:48+00:00): >review_requested=yes  

Willkommen bei OSM    
Sieht alles gut aus!
utack (2019-01-05 22:59:09+00:00): Mit Taste "S" im Editor kann man das Gebäude noch rechtwinklig machen, wenn es ausgewählt ist.
Mike Raust (2020-08-26 11:24:05+00:00): Dear Ti_Ru,

why have you reduced the correctness and level of detail of the riverbanks?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66055495
user_3216889 (2019-02-09 22:59:47+00:00): reverted by changeset 67060999
(see: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65349)
maraf24 (2019-01-05 19:42:02+00:00): "poprawa geometrii drogi na Zator oraz usunięcie duplikatów dla stacji paliw"
chris2map (2019-01-06 08:49:17+00:00): Korrekte Änderungssatz-Beschreibung lautet:
"removed oneway."
Quelle: "user-note."

JOSM hat mal wieder die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes nicht übernommen und erst dem nächsten Änderungssatz zugeordnet.
(JOSM assigned wrong changeset title).
mueschel (2019-01-06 10:41:56+00:00): Hi
you imported 3500 ways with tags like these:
AQRP_UUID=de2d8c43-46d7-452b-a798-ab2f26a9ed50
An_Classi=INC
CarRte=OUI
Che_Multi=OUI
Cls_CheFor=03
EtatRev=Non revêtue
Gestion=MFFP
NbrVoies=1
Source=ROUTARD
Version=AQ20180601

These don't look like they should appear in OSM - could you check this?

And: you give the source as "ministry data" -you have to be a bit more precise, e.g. under which license this data is available.

Jan
Vic130 (2019-01-06 14:33:19+00:00): I'll correct this.

The tracks are from AQréseau+, under Creative Common 4.0.
I'll indicate it more clearly from now on.

I'm rather new to OSM and I rather leave the tags in as they contain information about road quality and number of lanes.
mueschel (2019-01-06 15:10:10+00:00): Which flavor of cc 4.0 is this? Please be aware that cc-by is incompatible:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
Vic130 (2019-01-10 21:24:55+00:00): I've contacted Geoboutique, the organism in charge of diffusing geographical data for the Government of Québec and they asked me to indicated the source of the trails as Adresses Québec (© Gouvernement du Québec), but that the use of the data was in accordance with the license.
user_3216889 (2019-02-09 22:59:55+00:00): reverted by changeset 67060999
(see: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65349)
dikkeknodel (2019-05-29 18:33:58+00:00): Hi Gudetama17,
Thanks for heling out with project 5509. I notice you have drawn a lot of buildings, and they have all kinds of funny shapes. Most of the time building are rectangular though. iD editor has a fast way to do this, after you finished drawing the four points of the building you can push 'S' on the keyboard and the the corners are nicely squared.
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
seav (2019-05-30 12:20:33+00:00): Minor correction: To square areas/buildings, the new iD keyboard shortcut is 'Q' instead of 'S'.
dikkeknodel (2019-06-03 16:41:39+00:00): Thanks for the addition :-)
chris2map (2019-01-06 08:50:42+00:00): Korrekte Änderungssatz-Beschreibung lautet:
"added housenumber."
Quelle: "Maps4BW, LGL, www.lgl-bw.de"

JOSM hat mal wieder die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes nicht übernommen und erst dem nächsten Änderungssatz zugeordnet.
(JOSM assigned wrong changeset title).
viloan (2019-01-05 20:05:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-01-06 11:03:42+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tags you added here?
They are not used in any other place and they don't look llike they belong into the OSM database.

INEGI:carta=F14C14C
INEGI:condicion=PERMANENTE
INEGI:cve_edo=24
INEGI:cve_loc=0185
INEGI:cve_mun=055
INEGI:identifica=2191696
INEGI:objectid=20490

Thanks, Jan
T0mmy (2019-01-19 04:12:02+00:00): Hi Jan,
thanks for your feedback and apologies for my delayed response.

In the meantime I expanded the overview page about INEGI in the wiki with more details about datasets, links and tag infos.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/INEGI
It's not complete, yet and somehow I hope it gives a better overview of what data is available from INEGI and more people make use of.

While writing the docs, I realized that some of the tags are being used in multiple dataset and also in an index file about all places (localidades) like:  cve_edo / cve_mun / cve_loc.

Others might not be used across different datasets, so I am going to remove them from the places, where I added them, like:
carta, identifica, objectid

Hope the wiki explains a bit, let me know your thoughts.

Cheers,
Tommy
mueschel (2019-01-19 10:51:08+00:00): Hi Tommy,
thank you very much for documenting your work! This helps others to understand what you did.

I have one comment: It's not really common to use the name of the external source "INEGI" as the first part of keys. These are usually called 'ref:...'. Or, as these tags are limited to Mexico, I suggest to follow the scheme that is used e.g. in France:  'ref:FR:...'  to avoid confusion with other organizations in other countries.
So, instead of "INEGI:MUNID", you could use  "ref:MX:INEGI:MUNID" - and mappers can directly see that this is a Mexican thing.
T0mmy (2019-01-19 17:48:47+00:00): I agree and I also thought a lot about that in the beginning, because this is exactly what ref: is for and would be the consistent way having is globally done.
Anyways there were/are bigger import projects from INEGI being done already by other teams, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mexico's_Administrative_Divisions_Import_Project
here INEGI:MUNID was defined

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mexico_Road_Name_Import_Project
here INEGI:roadkey is defined

Since I am only manually and regional importing data (incl. manual review), my impact is not that big.

Nevertheless I still agree with you, but the bigger import projects should consider that in first place.


Another issue I am facing currently is: MUNID = CVE_ENT + CVE_MUN
LOCID = CVE_ENT + CVE_MUN + CVE_LOC
but I don't know a convinient way to concenate tags in JOSM.

It makes sense to have for place (localidad) only:  ref:MX:INEGI:LOCID
instead of
 INEGI:CVE_ENT,    INEGI:CVE_MUN, INEGI:CVE_LOC
Sanniu (2020-03-04 12:06:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552441756 - is not connected to any other path, can you connect it where appropriate?
maraf24 (2019-01-06 10:07:36+00:00): Numeracja jest dobra. Twoje adresy są natomiast w złym formacie i do tego duplkują te dobre.
Yohn79 (2019-01-06 10:22:56+00:00): Zrobiłem tak, bo wcześniej nadałem każdemu budynkowi numer i wyszedł mi bajzel, bo było za dużo numerów wszędzie. Jedne numery są dodane wcześniej przez kogoś innego i jak przesuniesz mapę dalej, to ulica ma numery ale bez budynków. Dlatego nie robiłem całej miejscowości, tylko pewien kawałek, aby nie robić za dużego bałaganu. Jak chcesz pomóc to tu mam wątek: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=14985&p=192
abakus_uploader (2019-01-05 23:30:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2019-01-06 10:06:15+00:00): Skoro nr 14 jest zły, to dlaczego ponownie nadałeś taki sam?
Yohn79 (2019-01-06 10:31:21+00:00): Nr. 14 jest nadany już wcześniej przez kogoś innego. Jak wejdziesz na warstwy, to zobaczysz, że numery są nieprzypisane do budynków. Ja natomiast wstawiłem budynek z numerem, no i teraz numery są zdublowane. Tu jest mój wątek, jeżeli chcesz mi pomóc https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=14985&p=192
maraf24 (2019-01-06 13:10:37+00:00): Adresy są tu z importu z danych gminy.
Nie muszą być koniecznie przypisane do budynku, moga być w postaci punktu na obrysie budynku.
Jeśli chcesz je przenieść na budynek, to zrób to przy użyciu funkcji "Scal" w edytorze - zaznaczasz z shiftem budynek i adres i scalasz.
maraf24 (2019-01-06 13:12:02+00:00): Weź też pod uwagę, że edytor webowy iD nie potrafi wyświetlać nazwy miejscowości, gdy adresy są bez nazw ulic.
By zobaczyć pełen adres trzeba kliknąć na  "Wszystkie znaczniki".
Yohn79 (2019-01-06 13:40:41+00:00): To jest chyba sedno sprawy. Sugerowałem się tym, że numery nadane przez gminę przejdą na budynki o tym samym numerze, co się nie stało, a na domiar złego każdy kwadracik miał te same dane, co skutkowało dublowaniem się numeracji. Numery nadane przez gminę są dobre. Pytanie teraz. Jak cofnąć moje zmiany numeracji, aby przywrócić te, które były nadane przez gminę?
pio2_122 (2019-01-12 12:38:31+00:00): Lepsze landuse dla sklepów ogrodniczych to retail, niż commercial (Wg. wiki: Obszar na którym są obiekty komercyjne, głównie biura, budynki biurowe, itp.)
viloan (2019-01-05 20:39:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
chris2map (2019-01-06 09:00:42+00:00): Le titre correct du changement est:
"added name to historic route."
source: "openstreetmap and wikipedia Grands_Goulets."

Accidentally JOSM assigned wrong comment to changeset with the upload.
Carlos Brys (2019-01-07 21:03:52+00:00): se agregaron datos de horario, facebook, telefono, email
Protoxenus (2020-08-02 18:36:16+00:00): Würdest du mal bitte deinen "Graben aus dem Letschiner Forst" überprüfen? Auf den aktuellen Luftbildern gibt es keinen Graben, der kilometerweit über Felder verläuft und schon gar nicht als Durchlass.

Danke
Protoxenus
Nakaner (2020-08-02 19:12:12+00:00): Hallo Protoxenus,

ulamm ist für 10 Jahre gesperrt worden. Siehe hierzu u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2925 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2756.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Protoxenus (2020-08-02 20:30:03+00:00): OK, 
wusste ich nicht, werde selbst versuchen, das Problem gerade zu biegen.
Gruß Protoxenus
gscholz (2019-01-13 08:45:32+00:00): Hola Raphael,
thsi changeset has created a lot of osm errors regarding duplicate nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-34.87729&lat=-8.05307&zoom=14

Can you please fix this and re-think your "double-click" usage in ID?
Saludos
Guido
raphaelmirc (2019-01-15 18:36:03+00:00): Não Achei erros referente a Praças, erros existem sobre Ruas e Prédios, peço que faça as Correções e não farei mais duplo clique no ID, não e a minha intenção fazer nós duplicados.
gscholz (2019-01-16 05:38:42+00:00): Hi,
in OSMI you can click on the colored dot marking the error. In the upper right section of the window you will then find an option to edit this error, with JOSM or ID. Click on your preferred button and you will get the eror opened right away to fix it.

Guido
raphaelmirc (2019-01-16 14:04:46+00:00): Bom Dia, Já concertei os Erros que constava nas Praças do Recife.

Obrigado pela ajuda!

Raphaelmirc
Jordy Kroeze (2019-01-05 22:11:04+00:00): MolenHorn Park Blijham
eggie (2019-01-05 22:27:52+00:00): De "manier" van mappen is nu goed. Het is natuurlijk wel de vraag of een stukje groen onder de definitie van Park valt. 
Het is echt niet de bedoeling om elk stukje groen van een layer leisure=park te voorzien alleen om bepaalde effecten te verkrijgen.
Het gebied bij de Hervormde Kerk zou ik dan eerder als park taggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
user_3216889 (2019-01-07 15:38:26+00:00): Dat stuk gras is geen 'park Molenhorn'.
Molenhorn is de naam van een heel oud stukje Blijham, rond oude raadhuis en ten zuiden daarvan.
Zie bijvoorbeeld in:
http://historie-bellingwedde.realsite.nl/projecten/blijham
eggie (2019-01-07 15:48:43+00:00): Omdat ik ook verder geen reactie heb ontvangen en met de aanvullende info van HenkL zal ik deze Pokemonedit terugdraaien. Waneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Dit soort edits liggen onder een vergrootglas bij de OSM community. Ook bij echte PokemonGo spelers.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-07 15:51:56+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #66100573
azakh-world (2019-01-10 09:46:51+00:00): Hello.
By removing subway tags from the station https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6129526877 you've broken the whole city transport system for some applications. Please don't change things if you have no full understanding.
Helmut Kauer (2019-01-06 13:17:56+00:00): Die Carports stehen nur noch zum Teil. Zwischen Carport und Rennermoos entsteht neues Gebäude und der linke große Parkplatz ist eine Tiefgarage
kdkeller (2019-01-06 21:49:51+00:00): Hallo Helmut,
vielen Dank für deine Nachricht.
Ich war vor einigen Tagen vor Ort. Richtung Hotel sind die Carports auf jeden Fall noch in Benutzung. Ich mach noch access=customers drauf.

Sonst: einfach verbessern :-)
Viele Grüße
Anakil (2019-01-05 23:39:38+00:00): Bonjour kortak,

Tout d'abord, merci de tes contributions ! Juste deux petits conseils :
- pour les piscines, ajoute aussi un tag "access=private" en plus de "leisure=swimming_pool" (pour désigner que ce sont des piscines privées, sinon c'est considéré comme une piscine public et je doute que les gens soient heureux de voir débarquer des personnes un jour ;-) ). 
- Pour les addresses, il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter la commune (ou le code postal) car ils sont implicitement donné par les polygones de limites administratives existantes (c'est optionnel, ce n'est pas faux de l'indiquer, c'est juste que ça fait gagner du temps de ne pas le faire et ça ne change rien ! Après si tu les ajoutes, pas de soucis. ;-) ). Seul la rue et le numéro de maison sont obligatoires pour retrouver l'adresse par la suite dans les applications...

Et sinon, si tu veux contacter la communauté belge pour dire bonjour, poser des questions ou quoi que ce soit, n'hésites pas à le faire via un des moyens de communications ici : https://openstreetmap.be/contact.html (on a un email, une mailing list, un chat riot (ou IRC), des réseaux sociaux...). 

Happy mapping,
Anakil
Membre d'OpenStreetMap Belgium
kortak (2019-01-08 10:53:10+00:00): Bonjour Anakil,

Un tout grand merci pour ce complément d'informations très utiles et à l'avenir, je n'hésiterai pas à entrer en contact avec la communauté belge d'openstreetmap que je suis ravi de découvrir. 

Très cordialement,
Kortak.
BCNorwich (2019-01-06 08:01:52+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Regarding your new footpath addition, way 660809077, I see it crosses a drain. Is there a bridge here? It then crosses and recrosses another footpath, at the second crossing there is no joining node.

If you need any help just ask. Regards Bernard.
FatOldSun (2019-01-09 15:31:34+00:00): Hi Bernard. I ran down this path and didn't pay much attention to features of it, I will have to go back and check. Regarding the other path it crosses, there is no official footpath here but it is used by some people. The whole area has been churned up as part of the new Berryfields development. I based my map amendment on my Garmin run map.
Carnildo (2019-01-06 07:30:45+00:00): Are you using an imagery offset?  These building outlines are consistently about seven feet southeast of where unadjusted imagery puts them.
Quinoaca (2019-01-06 22:35:28+00:00): Yes. Offset: 2.00; -2.50
freebeer (2019-01-06 23:47:21+00:00): ugh, i wouldn't...
in a quick look, the original vintage z19 clarity aligns close enough with newer esri and the new mapbox here that i would consider either of them good enough.

the rest are not even worth looking at or i'd try a z20 bing, but it is not to be.  (i see the residential boundaries were added by modern blur-o-scope bing and are a bit off)
Carnildo (2019-01-07 19:45:45+00:00): Esri claims a maximum imagery alignment error for the urban parts of Spokane County of no more than 0.4 meters: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=c03a526d94704bfb839445e80de95495, and comparing against Strava heatmap data says they're right.
Robert46798 (2019-01-06 10:56:25+00:00): Hallo rolf4,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Danke für deine Ergänzung.

Da ist alles in Ordnung.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
gecho111 (2019-01-10 01:53:10+00:00): Too bad they only update the imagery inside the city.  You can see the airbrushed border where it switches to older images, so no bypass.  I can usually get the roads pretty close from my bike gps alone, parking lots are little less accurate.
Константин Гам (2019-03-23 13:29:57+00:00): Это что за ноухаю такое? Односторонний проезд в воздухе подвешенный с названием KFC Auto?
532910 (2019-03-23 13:54:22+00:00): А ноуха удалять?
Односторонний проезд --- да.
KFC Auto --- да.
Порезаешь по нему и покупаешь еды в kfc.
В воздухе подвешенный --- ну ёпта, fixme добавь, чтоб не подгадало.
frosm (2019-01-05 23:27:42+00:00): bonjour et bienvenu
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
sur l'imagerie satellite de 2017, il y avait un local d'un étage accolé au batiment des logements.
est-ce voulu de l'avoir supprimé ? j'ai l'impression que c'est typiquement le genre de petit local qui sert aux commerces accessible depuis la rue.
bonne continuation
TheNathTheory (2019-01-05 23:37:21+00:00): La « véranda » a été démolie pour laisser place a une plus grande terrasse. L'ouverture du nouveau bar se fait en fin du mois de Janvier.
Merci!