piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frédéric Gutkin (2017-06-15 22:57:05+00:00): Hello Joost,
Indeed, I always have found these huge polygons very difficult to manage. Especially when it is composed of multiple ways with different tags.
It would be better to have smaller multipolygons/areas juxtaposed (sometimes with highways as limit), some of which would be tagged "decidious/broadleaved", other "needleleved" and others "mixed", as on topographic maps. It would also be easier to name the different parts of the forest.
The problem is that these polygons are sometimes so large that it would take a lot of work to redo them into smaller parts, with the risk of corrupting rendering. Unless you start with a corner of the polygon and gradually replace it with more precise areas, but it would take a lot of patience...!
mavl (2019-12-01 14:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
Mahdi0424 (2017-06-13 07:29:50+00:00): نیمه راه اصلاح شد.
mavl (2019-12-01 14:32:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
mavl (2019-12-01 14:34:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
Piskvor (2017-06-13 11:05:20+00:00): Hello, you have moved an address point for addr:street=K Červenému dvoru, addr:housenumber=3269/25a to an unlikely location. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49496256
mgpx (2017-06-13 21:33:30+00:00): Szia,
útmenti keresztet a historic=wayside_cross címkével tudsz jelölni. Ha csak a leírásban adod meg, hogy ez egy kereszt, akkor nem fog megjelenni a térképen.
Csabcsi (2017-06-14 06:50:28+00:00): Köszönöm mgpx, kezdő vagyok, kerestem a súgóban, de nem leltem. Remélem már jó lesz.
mavl (2019-12-01 14:32:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
RoterEmil (2017-06-13 10:13:21+00:00): Hallo SandraHaas, heißt das Restaurant wirklich 'Ober-Grafendorf'? Oder ist das der Ort? Direkt daneben war ja schon ein Restaurant eingetragen. Gleiches gilt für den 'Biergarten'/'Bier Garten'. Danke für kurzfristige Aufklärung und schöne Grüße
RoterEmil (2018-07-01 21:08:40+00:00): Finally partially reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60330408
aceman444 (2025-03-08 11:17:23+00:00): Hm, "opravy" aby sa bicykle dostali tam kam nemaju, na dodnes nezrealizovanu cyklotrasu? Neviem ako to bolo pre 7 rokmi, ale dnes je tam zakaz vjazdu vsetkych vozidiel, nie len motorovych.
Qomar IRM-ED (2023-01-11 03:45:38+00:00): Hallo Hanif,
Terima kasih ya telah ikut berkontribusi menambahkan data di OSM!
Saat ini saya sedang melakukan remote mapping untuk validasi jaringan kereta api yg ada di Indonesia.
Saya membutuhkan bantuan anda terutama untuk jalur rel kereta api ini, (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/350355790)

Saya menemukan issue layer tanpa tunnel/bridge di digitasi 5th yll, melihat pada riwayat osm bahwa anda menghapus tag tunnel digitasi dari user Firman Hadi akan tetapi tag Layer=-2 masih tetap ada pada jalur rel ini. Bisa dikonfirmasi informasi terkait layer dan tunnel tersebut.

Saya sangat mengapresiasi apapun informasi yang anda berikan.
Terima kasih
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-16 03:43:58+00:00): ضمن سلام و سپاس از ویرایشهای شما
برای کوچه ها تگ service=alley را اضافه نمیکنیم. و تنها جاده مسکونی برای تگ گذاری در کوچه های ایران رایج هستند. تگ service=alley یا کوچه خدماتی برای دالان پشتی خانه ها که جهت دسترسی به خدمات مثل آب و برق و گاز و یا مسیر منتهی به درب زیر زمین خانه هست، مورد استفاده قرار میگیرد که در ایران تعداد آنها انگشت شمار است. برای بن بستها هم از تگ جاده مسکونی استفاده میشود و اگر کوچه بسیار کوچک و در حد عبور عابر و دوچرخه بود از تگ راه پیاده استفاده میکنیم.
Nakaner (2017-06-13 17:35:35+00:00): Hi EliotB,

please stop your ongoing import!

You posted on the Imports mailing list 11 days ago but the documentation page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=LINZ/Address_Import&oldid=1481962) lacks some important information about your import and you are not using a dedicated account. 

Please read the Import Guidelines carefully. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

This changeset and similar changesets by you might be reverted because importing without following the guideline is just cheating.

Best regards

Michael
EliotB (2017-06-13 20:28:09+00:00): Which particular information do you think is lacking?  Please comment on the talk page of my documentation page.
BTW others have gone ahead with much bigger imports with zero discussion and no consequence or revert .
(I've been working on this on the NZ list for 2.5 years)
Nakaner (2017-06-13 20:37:14+00:00): I answered your email on the Imports mailing list a few minutes after I commented on this changeset. The Imports mailing list is a qualified place for discussions about imports. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-June/005026.html
woodpeck (2017-06-13 20:52:43+00:00): Eliot, feel free to point out those non-discussed other imports and we can deal with them appropriately. -- I notice that you've placed "ref" tags on these address points which is highly unusual and seems to contradict your own wiki page. Don't add "ref" tags.
EliotB (2017-06-13 21:09:53+00:00): @woodpeck, Yes, I will replace these with LINZ:address_id as on my wiki page.
(or otherwise as results from further discussion)
mavl (2019-12-01 14:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
literan (2017-06-13 11:02:33+00:00): highway=pedestrian это тег для именованных пешеходных улиц (как Арбат, Камергерский. Еще есть мнение что им можно обозначать наиболее выдающиеся пешеходные дороги в парках, как главные аллеи в Парке Горького), здесь ему не место.
F-5 System (2017-06-13 11:29:28+00:00): Да, я знаю, просто проверил, вдруг при установке тега "pedestrian" алгоритмы начнут вести через эту область даже при отсутствии дорог. Но это не так, они его не учитывают. В описании так и сказано: рисуйте дорожки, некоторые алгоритмы без них поведут по границе "области", но не более.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area
literan (2017-06-13 11:33:37+00:00): Да, в данном случае он будет считать эту детскую площадку квадратной пешеходной линией, и должен по ней вести. Имейте в виду, что многие онлайн-роутеры (например, те, что на http://www.openstreetmap.org под кнопкой со стрелками), используют какую-то свою базу, куда подкачивают данные после внесения изменений в OSM только дня через 3-4. Так что проверять надо по прошествии времени ))
F-5 System (2017-06-13 11:37:17+00:00): Задержку в обновлении информации у роутеров я тоже заметил. Спасибо.
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 18:11:48+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism.
Zie forumtopic 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58795
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 18:12:01+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism.
Zie forumtopic 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58795
RicoElectrico (2017-06-13 18:05:19+00:00): Cześć, parkingu tak nie oznaczamy. Popatrz na zachód wokół ul. Gdańskiej - tak powinno być. Obecnie to zrobiłeś(aś) oznaczony tylko z nazwy obszar "Parking lot".
Tak samo New street - przecież ta ulica nie ma takiej tabliczki.

Jeśli masz jeszcze jakieś pytania czy kłopoty, chętnie pomogę :)
Palooka (2017-06-13 20:40:17+00:00): Poprawione :)
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 18:12:15+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism.
Zie forumtopic 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58795
hfst (2017-09-03 19:01:11+00:00): Hallo Modprog, ich bin den Strand abgegangen und habe festgestellt, dass bei vielen Strandzugängen die Nummer nicht (mehr) stimmt. Außerdem gibt es nach Deiner Änderung Abweichungen zwischen der Zahl in name=Strandzugang XY und ref=XZ.
Vor dem Hintergrund würde ich Deine Änderung rückgängig machen bzw. die von mir erfassten Nummern eintragen.
ModProg (2017-09-10 21:37:54+00:00): Tu dass, ich hatte den Strand nur teilweise gesehen und da haben die Nummern nicht gepasst, deshalb habe ich das nach dem Plan gemacht, kann mir aber sehr gut vorstellen das der veraltert ist.
hfst (2017-09-12 20:02:44+00:00): Nummern nach Schildern aktualisiert. Zwei Nummern fehlen => Notes erstellt.
mavl (2019-12-01 14:32:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
hihiro (2017-06-14 09:17:35+00:00): GPSと既存の道路等を加味して、「Japan GSI ortho imagery」のトレースで道路を追加、それに関連する道路の修正をしています。
RoterEmil (2017-12-14 09:47:53+00:00): Hallo, ich habe den Eintrag "Zuhause" und das community_centre (ohne weitere Angaben) soeben entfernt. Bitte keine privaten Einträge bei OSM machen, sondern nur Daten von "öffentlichem Interesse". Nur so kann die Datenqualität bei OSM erhalten bleiben und davon profitieren auf lange Sicht alle, auch Du :)
Danke und schönen Tag Dir :)
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-16 11:41:09+00:00): Map edits are PUBLIC and everyone can see them. Personal points are not allowed. I removed your change.

If you want to mark points, use Maps.Me's bookmarks feature. Bookmarks are private and only you can see them.
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-16 11:44:47+00:00): Commented on the wrong changeset.
mavl (2017-06-13 16:34:00+00:00): Здравствуйте. На точке указан тег ручья [http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1675487523]. Возможно, это ошибка.
Jungo2005 (2017-06-16 10:30:15+00:00): Hallo,
bist du sicher, dass sich die UK in der Industrieweg befindet und nicht in Am Holm 74? Südöstlich gegenüber von den Gleisen? Der OV ist 2013 laut eigener Webseite umgezogen. https://www.thw-neustadt.de/aktuelles/aktuelle-meldungen/artikel/unsere-neue-unterkunft-ist-fertig/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97172101
4b696d (2017-06-17 18:55:04+00:00): Ja, klar, mein Fehler. Habe es korrigiert. Danke :-)
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-13 10:39:38+00:00): Just curious: Why was "Karni Ramon" removed? Duplicate?
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-13 10:40:33+00:00): Nevermind. You added it back as a ridge.
nplath (2018-06-01 10:16:38+00:00): May you please add a tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11396757 ? In the moment it's an untagged remnant.
dmgroom_ct (2018-06-01 13:05:31+00:00): The only tag which I would add would be a note that this was was part of the original PGS coastline import.  However, since this information can already be obtained from this ways history, I see no point in adding such a tag.
Ryzen (2018-06-01 15:12:59+00:00): Discussion stalker: Someone like me could delete the untagged way. If you prefer the way untagged, I see no point in keeping it.
dmgroom_ct (2018-06-01 15:54:58+00:00): It's left there so that someone with greater local knowledge than myself can tag this way appropriately, possibly as part of a waterway = riverbank relation.
Ryzen (2018-06-01 15:59:41+00:00): Even a fixme wouldn't be enough. Should I or will you talk to that community?
dmgroom_ct (2018-06-01 16:02:13+00:00): please feel free to add a fixme if you so wish
nplath (2018-06-01 17:34:21+00:00): if I go to http://taghistory.raifer.tech/ and enter "fixme" resp. "FIXME" you will see that this is futile
mavl (2019-12-01 14:32:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
Marych_ (2017-06-13 11:11:50+00:00): Что такое Кутбинисо?
Магазин, Кафе ресторан.
ToniE (2017-06-13 11:32:32+00:00): Hello maipablikname,

oneway=yes is not the right way to tag this.

I've applied "access:forward=yes" and "access:backward=no" to the appropriate segment - and this is only the right-most one.

Most of your oneway=yes tags are superflous, because even if you want to take this road in the right direction, how do you get there - all access to the entry of the way is blocked. No way to take this way in either direction.

best regards
Toni
Baloo Uriza (2017-06-13 12:51:45+00:00): Is this in regards to the DACGroup edits?
woodpeck (2017-06-13 13:55:58+00:00): Yes, the bulk was deleted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49484818 but some that had been edited by other people remained; it turned out that those edited by others were mostly still useless and they were then deleted in this changeset.
Baloo Uriza (2017-06-13 14:37:34+00:00): OK.  Were any of those in Oklahoma east of I 35?  I know I worked on conflating some of those with existing data.
Baloo Uriza (2017-06-14 11:27:38+00:00): OK, I think this might have been overzealous.  I see this removed Node: 4897994740, which I had fixed.
woodpeck (2017-06-14 11:48:50+00:00): I did a spot-check of some of the "fixed" objects and found that in many cases, only a part of the original problem had been repaired - sometimes a tag was fixed but the location was still in the middle of the road, or vice versa. In your particular example, you did fix the amenity tag but you left an advertising tracking ID in the "linkedin" URL. Now of course you can't be expected to even detect such rubbish but I thought that there's bound to be similar problems with all the "fixed" objects, and better to get rid of them altogether.
user_3216889 (2017-06-13 21:49:04+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-13 22:56:57+00:00): Heeft dit aangebrachte voetpad geen connectie met de Lijsterbesstraat?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4912571095
mds878 (2017-06-13 13:02:41+00:00): 三国本町交番東側のセブンイレブンはそのまま存在しているので、リバート対応しておきました。消さないようにお願いします。
Rakkka (2017-06-13 23:21:45+00:00): セブンイレブンが残っているのに気づきませんでした。ただ、ご自分で編集できるなら最初からご自分で編集していただけますでしょうか。
mds878 (2017-06-14 10:25:14+00:00): 最初のコメントを入れた段階では航空写真がもっと古く住宅が残っている状態だったので、修正困難でした。そのため、将来自分で修正するつもりでメモを残しましたが、写真が更新されていることに気がついていませんでした。
Road–Runner (2017-06-14 18:34:09+00:00): Hallo.
Ist hier denn wirklich ein Hotel? Wenn ja welchen Namen hat es?
mavl (2019-12-01 14:34:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
borishag (2017-06-26 13:19:07+00:00): Beste Tobi,
Graag alle nodes van Kruidvat Winkels laten staan als node, in verband met de vindbaarheid en de bedrijfsrichtlijnen van AS Watson. (bron: AS Watson BNL) Ik zal de node weer terugplaatsen.

Boris

Editor AS Watson Stores
woodpeck (2017-06-14 11:21:01+00:00): You moved the node "satyashor shiva mandir" a little bit - why? The Bing imagery doesn't really agree with the new position. Did you notice that the node was tagged "addr;city" (instead of addr:city), or that it is part of an useless, untagged rectangle that you could have deleted?  I am trying to understand (1) how did you stumble across this particular object and (2) why did you then move it a bit but not fix the obvious bugs? What is the purpose of this edit?
Aleks-Berlin (2017-06-14 19:30:06+00:00): Hi woodpeck,

in taginfo I saw an "addr;city"-key.
which I tried to fix for node/4908609673 which is close by. But by accident I moved it a little and more sad the key got not fixed. After this I saw, that the building looks rect-like in picture but not in shape of line. So  applied the make-rectangle button. Yes I saw the difference in size, but I thought (due to the poor picture quality here) that the real size is perhaps larger than the white square. I estimated the first user knows the size and only made a bad rectangle shape.

I will first fix the 2 addr;city nodes (also node/4908609673),
mark way/499601143 as fixme=no_tags,
and will correct the shape to match the white square in sat-picture, and bring back the old position of the first node (not part of the line).
I hope you agree to this. I'm also sorry for not have worked in a expected way here.
regards, Alex
mavl (2019-12-01 14:36:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
bkil (2020-08-12 00:25:20+00:00): Hello! Could you please explain what your intention was with these changes? For example, you have reactivated Gastland Király utca that already had a lifecycle prefix. Did it reopen? Why didn't you remove the lifecycle prefix?
DK7080BE (2017-06-13 16:23:35+00:00): På Spar Esbjergs hjemmeside står der HANS på facaden. Burde navnet så ikke være "HANS", dvs name=HANS; alt_name=SPAR Esbjerg; old_name=Kurts Supermarked
mikini (2017-06-13 17:16:27+00:00): Det er en gimmick, de har manipuleret alle købmænds fornavn ind på facaden af deres butik på hjemmesiden. Fandt eksempel i Munkebo der havde et nyligt Mapillary-billede, virkelighed vs. hjemmeside; https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=7oCXcFIGssP5kihQDF567A&focus=photo og https://spar.dk/butik/spar-munkebo. SPAR refererer selv til butikken som "SPAR Esbjerg", derfor synes jeg det er mest korrekt at anvende som name. Det giver også mening at kunne skelne butikkerne fra hinanden bare ud fra navn. Men du kan nok have ret i at Kurt skulle i old_name i stedet for alt_name.
Hjart (2017-06-13 18:01:29+00:00): Med hensyn til stednavne (på butikker), kan det være en god ide at være opmærksom på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shops#Name (sidste paragraf)
DK7080BE (2017-06-13 18:12:28+00:00): Burde det så ikke være:
name=SPAR
alt_name=HANS; Hans; SPAR Esbjerg
old_name=Kurts Supermarked
Hjart (2017-06-13 18:32:16+00:00): Indtil videre må det formentlig være lidt efter smag og behag.
Jeg er begyndt at forsøge mig med branch tagget: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pJl
Jeg er dog endnu ikke begyndt at prøve af hvorvidt det hvorvidt det (kan) fungerer efter hensigten.
DK7080BE (2017-06-13 18:47:33+00:00): Bliver branch-tagget taget med i betragtning når man søger i osm.orgs søgefelt? alt- og old-tagget gør.
Hjart (2017-06-13 18:58:01+00:00): Det ser ikke ud til det. På den anden side er tagget jo allerede anvendt 50k gange (de fleste endda før wiki artiklen blev oprettet), så det er ikke usandsynligt det kommer. Bemærk dog at ikke alle anvendelserne følger beskrivelsen i artiklen (prøv at køre søgningen over et område i London)
DK7080BE (2017-06-13 19:06:18+00:00): Det er et problem på kortet at man ikke kan se kædens navn, hvis man anvender fornavnet som butiksnavn, men efter fornavnet er der et symbol som står for "SPAR", så man kan vel bruge:
name=HANS (SPAR)
alt_name=SPAR Esbjerg
old_name=Kurts Supermarked
mikini (2017-06-13 21:25:47+00:00): Personligt synes jeg købmandens fornavn er irrelevant i name, hvorfor vil du havde det der? At putte felter i parentes er en formatteringsting, som vi helst skal overlade til databrugeren og kontekst.
Ifht. "place annotation" tænkte min struktur-hjerne som udgangspunkt at der burde være et entydigt name på tværs af kortet, og helst samstemmende med det som organisationen selv bruger om stedet. Men visualiserende et kort som slutprodukt, kan jeg godt se at det kun bidrager med unødigt rod at have stednavnet duplikeret i mange af POI'ernes name (som også argumenteret på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Key:branch). Konklusion; jeg er overbevist om fornuftigheden i wiki'ens formulering, tak for sparket. Vil lige se om jeg kan finde en mere  argumenterende formulering til wiki'en. Retter til name=SPAR, branch=Esbjerg, old_name=Kurts Supermarked. Desværre nej, Nominatim ser ikke ud til at kigge i branch endnu (https://github.com/openstreetmap/Nominatim/search?q=branch), og heller ikke umiddelbart nogen forespørgsler i issues på at tilføje det.
hihiro (2017-06-14 09:18:44+00:00): GPSと既存の道路等を加味して、「Japan GSI ortho imagery」のトレースで道路を追加、それに関連する道路の修正をしています。
maraf24 (2017-06-14 19:36:26+00:00): Stare nazwy niemieckie umieszczamy w old_name:de.
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 18:12:31+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism.
Zie forumtopic 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58795
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 18:12:45+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism.
Zie forumtopic 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58795
Alexander-II (2017-06-14 06:57:36+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap. По этому (и некоторым другим) пакету правок был сделан откат, потому что качество отрисовки низкое. Имеющиеся спутниковые снимки позволяют сделать это детальнее. Так же не стоит описывать объекты через поле name. Оно придумано и должно использоваться только для имен собственных (наименований). Чтобы описывать объект, следует использовать соответствующие теги. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE  
Так же у парков и деревьев во дворе с 99% уверенностью адреса не существует. Адрес существует только на тех объектах, которым его присвоил соответсвующий орган РФ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.9A.D0.B0.D0.BA.D0.B8.D0.BC_.D0.BE.D0.B1.D1.8A.D0.B5.D0.BA.D1.82.D0.B0.D0.BC_.D0.BD.D0.B5.D0.B4.D0.B2.D0.B8.D0.B6.D0.B8.D0.BC.D0.BE.D1.81.D1.82.D0.B8_.D0.B2_.D0.A0.D0.BE.D1.81.D1.81.D0.B8.D0.B8_.D0.BC.D0.BE.D0.B3.D1.83.D1.82_.D0.B1.D1.8B.D1.82.D1.8C_.D0.BF.D1.80.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.B2.D0.BE.D0.B5.D0.BD.D1.8B_.D0.B0.D0.B4.D1.80.D0.B5.D1.81.D0.B0

Название, которое вы указали у парка, нигде не гуглится и, скорее всего, взято из головы. Так делать тоже не стоит. Более того, этот парк уже нанесен на карту https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52068185
Marián Kyral (2017-06-13 18:03:56+00:00): Ahoj,
cestu není potřeba pojmenovávat, že to je cyklostezka je jasné z tagu highway=cycleway.

Marián
Marián Kyral (2017-06-13 18:07:16+00:00): A mimochodem, ta cyklostezka tam je nová? Protože předtím to byla jen vyježděná polní cesta (tracktype=grade4). Viz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:tracktype?uselang=cs
mavl (2019-12-01 14:34:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
A67-A67 (2017-07-28 19:22:29+00:00): Ik begrijp deze wijziging niet helemaal. De N572 is een provinciale weg in de serie N400-N999. Deze provinciale wegen zijn, op enkele uitzonderingen na, highway=secondary en niet highway=primary.
A67-A67 (2017-07-28 19:45:26+00:00): Ik heb de highway=secondary hersteld. 
Zie ook: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging
PT-53 (2017-06-13 15:06:24+00:00): Hallo bäbbie,
Du arbeitest ja mit dem Editor JOSM. Bei diesem kann man die amtliche Karte Maps4BW als Hintergrund einblenden. Damit könntest Du den Verlauf des von Dir eingezeichneten Waldweges abgleichen und eventuell verbessern. Es wäre auch gut, wenn Du noch tracktype (Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype) ergänzen würdest. Dazu mußt den Waldweg eventuell noch aufspalten.
Hinweis: Maps4BW  (Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW) enthält auch Fehler, insbesondere bei Waldwegen. Also Waldwege nur noch vorheriger Überprüfung vor Ort und Abgleich mit Deiner GPS-Aufzeichnung in OSM eintragen.
Grüße
bäbbie (2017-06-14 17:49:35+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
ich habe dir ja schon geschrieben, wie ich allgemein vorgehe. Als Kompromiss habe ich mich etwas nach der Maps4BW gerichtet. Finde aber das eigene 
Sammeln von Daten ist der Grundgedanke von OSM. Sonst bekommen wir wie bei so vielen anderen Karten die ganzen Wege, die es so nicht mehr gibt und wegen des Kopieren von einer Quelle immer weiter getragen werden. Vielleicht ist dir auch aufgefallen, dass in diesem Gebiet Wege (nicht von mir) immer wieder von der Maps4BW abweichen. 
Grüßle Bäbbie