piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
species (2015-04-21 07:55:55+00:00): Das Ding kann doch ruhig 2 "Main" Tags haben, oder?
Oder haben sie wirklich nur den einen Raum?
cschueller (2015-04-21 13:14:10+00:00): Keine Ahnung - war nie drinnen. Passt es jetzt so?
species (2015-04-21 13:23:21+00:00): Nur von außen ist nicht zu erkennen, ob es das Büro einer Druckerei ist, oder das Ladengeschäft. Bitte bei Unklarheiten keine Tags löschen, wenn man sich nicht sicher ist - da bietet sich z.B. das "fixme"-Tag an.

Und shop=printshop ist sehr ungebräuchlich - shop nur verwenden, wenn man dort direkt was kaufen kann.
Aber derzeit würde ich beide Tags dort belassen.
cschueller (2015-04-21 13:26:47+00:00): Alles klar - magst mir bitte einen Revert machen?
species (2015-04-22 06:27:01+00:00): Kannst du auch machen - ein revert ist einfach ein neues Changeset, das alte Dinge wiederherstellt, indem es alte Eigenschaften wieder neu setzt. Du kannst also den office= - tag einfach wieder drauftun.
Oder du besucht Freitag meine JOSM-Workshop, wo ich das reverter-Plugin herzeige^^
cschueller (2015-04-22 12:24:33+00:00): Ich hab da - im Moment - gar nichts verändert:

Der Khil ist eine kleine Akzidenzdruckerei und hat mWn. KEINEN Verkaufsshop.

Jetzt ist die gute Frage, welches Tag man da verwenden könnte. Denn craft=printer gibt es nicht.
species (2015-05-08 19:02:16+00:00): natürlich gibt es craft=printer - hast du ja eben erfunden! Hab ich gleich mal gesetzt ☺
Warin61 (2019-04-21 23:23:45+00:00): Hi,

Do you mean the name of the track is "Unnamed' OR that the tack has no name???
treestryder (2015-04-20 01:28:27+00:00): Should this be a point at the front door, on a generic building?
treestryder (2015-04-20 14:07:49+00:00): I like the way the competitors are doing it. Generic building with a POI point.
G0d (2018-07-23 19:52:18+00:00): Why do these buildings have a multi polygon relationship?
rickmastfan67 (2015-04-20 04:27:50+00:00): Northway Mall is still the official name for it.  Signs up everywhere for it still.
GeoKitten (2015-05-17 19:30:35+00:00): I apologize. I shouldn't have done that. I can't remember why I did.
Warin61 (2018-09-28 05:38:54+00:00): Hi,
Looks to me like this 'track' is really a route made up of several tracks/cycleways.
muralito (2016-04-18 02:48:24+00:00): ¿La linea 18 es circular?
¿o habria que dibujarle una relacion de ida y otra de vuelta?
tizzi (2016-04-26 23:50:16+00:00): Es circular estimado muralito, es una linea que se agrego para realizar combinacion con la plaza central (Plaza Roca) que es por donde pasan la mayoria de las lineas para conectar toda la ciudad con el nuevo hospital central
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-23 02:47:16+00:00): What's the source for these, bing doesn't appear to have the buildings.

Unfortunately a lot of these seem duplicated as well; and I can't pick which is the most accurate version
srividya_c (2017-03-23 12:40:56+00:00): Hi CloCkWeRX,

Thank you for flagging this changeset. 

We have reverted changeset 30347008 which created the duplicates and cleaned up the area. 

The main source we used to trace these buildings was Mapbox Imagery. As a local mapper, it would be great if you verify these buildings existence and provide feedback.
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-25 10:43:19+00:00): The current mapbox imagery seems to be blank, which is weird. Non free imagery suggests they do exist though.
Apo-Shower (2022-05-28 05:52:41+00:00): Mein-Zuhause
zimba (2015-04-21 12:45:03+00:00): Hallo,
Du hast 1A eingezeichnete Haeuser durch schiefe, ungetaggte Ways ersetzt -> Habe deine Aenderungen zurueckgenommen, weil sie nichts zu OSM beitragen.
lg
Max Josef (2015-04-21 13:24:42+00:00): hallo zimba, die häuser sind gerade letzten monat fertiggestellt worden, ich wohne seit 35 jahre gegenüber , ich weiss schon was ich da eingezeichnet habe, das was ihr vor drin hattet ist vor zwei jahren abgerissen worden. grüsse von max josef.
zimba (2015-04-23 08:11:23+00:00): Okay, in dem fall entschuldigung fuers rausloeschen (wobei die leeren flaechen eh nie auf der karte angezeigt wurden). Habs jetzt wieder reingenommen und die beiden grossen vierecke als haus (building=yes) markiert, beim mittleren musste ich raten, ist das ein parkplatz?

Ich hoffe du laesst dich dadurch jetzt nicht entmutigen, hier http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features gibts eine liste von Tags falls du wieder mal was einzeichnen willst.

lg
Skippern (2015-04-20 12:17:58+00:00): source=context means what?
hofoen (2015-04-20 12:22:59+00:00): e.g. just closing a gap of a few meters
Skippern (2015-04-20 12:39:16+00:00): I was guessing about that, maybe could be explained better in the changeset comment?
Gazer75 (2015-04-22 13:26:35+00:00): Problemene med Nore Uvdal kan fiksast med å slette data. Det som er lagt inn er av dårlegare kvalitet enn Karverkets N50, så vi må ta den kommunen på nytt uansett.
anderfo (2015-04-22 13:46:34+00:00): Jepp, men litt sketchy å slette data - dette gjelder både denne importen og corine-importen. Men vi kan kanskje slette dersom det er uendret etter import?
Gazer75 (2015-04-22 14:01:56+00:00): Ja klart det. Tenkte meir på at ein ikkje bruka tid på og fikse på data som bør bytast ut seinare. Duplicate nodes fiksar JOSM "automatisk" så det går jo greit.

Blir bra med litt N50 ;) Norge ser ganske trist og øde ut i dag.
anderfo (2015-04-22 14:11:54+00:00): Problemet var egentlig at JOSM ikke ville la meg laste opp data med valideringsfeil i - og feilene i nabokommunen gjorde det dessuten vanskeligere enn vanlig å detektere feil i mitt eget datasett (bruker jo JOSM validering for å finne bl.a. duplikatnoder der) siden de få duplikatnodene fra N50 ble "kamuflert" blant titusener av duplikatnoder i tilgrensende område... Tilsvarende for alle andre valideringsfeil og -warnings.

Blir fint med N50-import, ja. Men det er mye arbeid! Får håpe at "prøveimporten" i Trøndelag og på Vestlandet kan inspirere slik at flere vil bidra i resten av landet. Jeg orker ikke å ta 1/4 av Norge, men noen kommuner kan man klare :)
Gazer75 (2015-04-22 14:18:16+00:00): Var det så ille!? hmm... 
Eg kjem nok til å ta litt etter kvart som eg gidd å arbeide med det. Tenker å fullføre Hordaland så lenge eg ikkje går lei :)
anderfo (2015-04-24 15:17:26+00:00): Det var ille, ja ;) Sjekk OSM Inspector for Nore og Uvdal: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=9.12224&lat=60.26192&zoom=10&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags,multipolygons_type_is_boundary,type_is_boundary,ways,role_markers,way_end_nodes,way_nodes
FahRadler (2016-04-05 16:32:23+00:00): was hast du mit way 339508212 gemeint?, der hat keine tags
user_16881 (2016-04-05 16:35:56+00:00): Gute Frage... Hab' ihn gelöscht.
ratrun (2015-04-21 17:47:17+00:00): It looks you don't want to understand: Please stop uploading of whole GPS tracks! I already explained you politely the reasons in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30065747. If you continue messing up the data, I'll need to ask the data working group to block your account.
CAI Stabia (2015-04-21 19:51:06+00:00): Ok, let's do it this way.
I have finished loading tracks. If you see some additional error, just tell me. I'll try to fix it myself. In this way I will learn. Regarding loading tracks with JOSM, unfortunately there are tons of documents that do not specify the proper way to do it as you say. They say only: load the GPX, add some tags and upload. 
I apologize if I have inadvertently created problems.
Stereo (2015-04-20 12:52:29+00:00): Hello! (Moien?)

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you have removed the steps to the train platform. How do people access the platform now?

Happy mapping,

Guillaume
sergeybe (2017-03-14 18:54:16+00:00): Давайте вместе разберемся где "Узкие Ворота" а где "Малые Ворота".
Я все же думаю "Узкие Ворота" там где тур стоит и тропа 177 выходит к грунтовке, что раньше были помечены как "Малые Ворота". 
А Ваше мнение какое на этот счет?
Антон-1983 (2017-03-14 20:33:20+00:00): Я обозначил перевалы в соответствии с обсуждением на форуме. Дайте мне неделю - я найду и перечитаю информацию ещё раз. Ещё подключу местного краеведа. Он редко отвечает, но думаю за неделю даст ответ. Я в июне там проходил - никого не встретил на всём Караби. Кроме коней.
Антон-1983 (2017-03-19 18:06:25+00:00): Пообщался с несколькими людьми, почитал форум, докладываю единое мнение:
1 Там где стоит тур и начинается грунтовка - настоящий перевал БАлабан-алан (Хрыколь)
2 То, что на карте нанесено как перевалы Большие ворота, Узкие ворота, Малые ворота - на самом деле не перевалы - а проходы между скал, то есть участки троп. Перевалом в их истинном смысле нет.
3 Чтобы не путать людей, предлагаю оставить уже закрепившиеся названия объектов как перевалы.
4 Проход Малые ворота нанесен верно - там совсем короткая тропа.
5 Проход Узкие ворота начинается от разделения троп 175 и 177 и заканчивается слиянием троп 176 и 177.
Название записаны Игорем Белянским при опросе местных жителей. Он, как Вы знайте, топонимику практически всего Крыма и записал...

Откорректировал карту - добавил перевал Балабан-алан, Халлузея-богаз, общие исправления.
Не совсем понял где перевал Кой-кая-богаз. Пещера Церковь вроде как находится западнее, но есть ещё Церковь-2 - возможно где-то там...
Антон-1983 (2017-03-19 18:08:15+00:00): Общая картина на фото
http://eurotourist.club/img.php?img=http://eurotourist.club/img/forum/1238399940.jpg
sergeybe (2017-03-20 17:15:06+00:00): 1. Давайте все же в alt_name у Узких Ворот укажем Малые Ворота, так как большинство туристов поймут о каком месте идет речь;
2. В крымской топонимике принято все названия через тире писать с большой буквы в отличии к примеру от башкирской;
3. Я склоняюсь к тому что все буквы в названии "Проход Малые Ворота" нужно писать с большой буквы так как это стало именем собственным;
4. Может перевалы так и описать как точки на тропах, а проходы перенести на названия троп? По идее "Проход Малые Ворота" и есть тропа;
5. А откуда взято название Кой-Кая-Богаз? Очень странное название для этого места. По русски это как "перевал у деревенской скалы".
Что Вы думаете по этим пунктам?
Антон-1983 (2017-03-23 20:08:08+00:00): 1) Я предлагаю не вводить alt_name у Узких Ворот укажем Малые Ворота: так как это ошибка на старых картах. В Osm и Wikimapii (там неверно нанесены Малые ворота) уже более 3 лет используется верное обозначение. На сколько я слышал в новых картах ошибка исправлена также.
2) Согласен
3) Согласен
4) Лучше оставить как есть, а то начнётся новая волна путаницы. Хотя Проход Узкие ворота мне нравится как нанесен в Wikimapia. 
5) Прошу прощения - имел ввиду Кутур-Кая-Богаз. Его нанес на карту, а также Бахлаер Северный и Южный на Кучук-Яйле.
sergeybe (2018-02-27 15:33:40+00:00): Здравствуйте, Антон! Не хотите поучаствовать в дискуссии по поводу названия этих перевалов? Здесь один человек решил навести "порядок", не вникая в суть проблемы. Ссылка на обсуждение:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56707710
grosvalpin (2015-04-20 10:14:31+00:00): je crois que c'est ça avec la map
luschi (2015-04-20 19:07:10+00:00): leisure_1 und leisure_2 gibt es nicht als tag. Macht ja auch nicht viel Sinn die selbe Fläche als Spielplatz, Sauna und Schwimmbecken zu mappen.
In diesem Hotel sind locker 5-6 Fehler enthalten.

bevor du weiter hier herumspielst solltest du deine 1000 Fehler ausbessern:http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/byuser/Pathumthani
Jojo4u (2015-04-20 14:25:55+00:00): Hallo Energiesparheld, jetzt gibt es zwei 	place_of_worship, einmal das Gebäude und einmal als Knoten darin. Diesen würde ich wieder löschen, die Attributierung am Gebäude reicht aus.

LG Joachim
Jojo4u (2015-04-21 13:01:32+00:00): Vielen Dank fürs Korrigieren und herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)

LG Joachim
Weide (2015-04-21 12:19:49+00:00): Wenn man einen highway=bus_stop-Node von neben der Fahrbahn in die Fahrbahn schiebt, muss in allen Routen aus der vorher korrekten Rolle "platform" die dann richtige Rolle "stop" werden.

Beim Anlegen einer neuen "platform" muss diese mit der richtigen Rolle eingefügt werden -- die leere Rolle bedeutet "Fahrweg".
Владимир К (2016-09-12 11:08:11+00:00): А что значит 5 в названии?
Владимир К (2016-09-12 11:09:07+00:00): всё, я понял.
Minh Nguyen (2015-04-26 22:58:11+00:00): OSM classifies population centers based on population and prominence, regardless of legal status. That way software based on OSM don’t have to worry about every country’s definition of a city when labeling cities a certain way. So as a suburb to another city and as a place with under 100,000 residents, Springdale is tagged place=town, not place=city. Please see <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity> for more information.
robert (2015-04-20 19:34:27+00:00): Are you absolutely sure about the Apollo Way -> Apollo Road change? Ordnance Survey Locator seems to think it's Apollo Way: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=37747
PanierAvide (2015-05-05 11:31:04+00:00): J'ai pu constater que vous avez indiqué le nom "Route inutile" sur une des routes, est-ce son vrai nom ou un jugement de valeur ?
will_p (2015-04-20 13:55:14+00:00): You have changed hundreds of buildings tagged with building=offices to building=office.

I regard this change as controversial and think it should be reverted. building=offices has been used for a number of years and any attempt to merge it with building=office should have been discussed first.
d1g (2015-04-20 14:28:25+00:00): I haven't checked every edit, but most changes are fine. It is hard to spell office/offices if you are not native speaker.

Also, building=offices wasn't documented and was entered by multiple hit-and-run mappers around the world.
will_p (2015-04-20 15:30:36+00:00): I have used both building=office and building=offices for a number of years. I disagree this edit is just fixing typos.

I don't regard the two values as exactly equivalent. In the past I have used building=offices for large office buildings typically housing more than one company. I now think building=commercial is better for this. building=office, however, implies to me a smaller office building typically used by a single company.

There are of course different opinions about which building tags should be used and in general it is worthwhile trying to standardise things, but this should not be done using undiscussed mass tag edits, especially when the values being changed aren't exactly equivalent.

Regarding the wiki, it doesn't matter whether building=offices is documented - building=office isn't either! The documented building tags seem to change all the time, so like many mappers I choose to ignore them.
d1g (2015-04-20 17:33:34+00:00): > building=office, however, implies to me a smaller office building typically used by a single company
1. this tag wasn't documented at wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Document_your_custom-tags
2. in OSM we use pattern building=<typology> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building), it doesn't matter if it is operated/owned by single company or by multiple companies. I suggest you to add this information as note=* tag to building so you can add appropriate number of office=company points inside.
will_p (2015-04-20 18:31:23+00:00): Your second point doesn't make sense to me. I am tagging building typology. A large office block is a different sort of building from a single office unit. It's similar to building=house and building=apartments.

Anyway, the issue here isn't the correctness of my tagging, it is a question of whether a mass undiscussed tag change was appropriate. I doubt all 919 changes were manually reviewed.

I'll wait a few more hours to see whether the user who made the changes (pschonmann) wishes to discuss it (and preferably revert). If not, I'll make a compliant to the Data Working Group.
pschonmann (2015-04-20 19:29:15+00:00): Holy Cow ! I edited whole world ! I was using local taginfo.openstreetmap.cz / expecting changes in CZ only. Seems that was mistake. Reverting that changeset.
But i still think building=office is appropriate tag, doesnt matter how building is large. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Doffice exists, offices not. Office can be described more in detail with office=* tag
SomeoneElse (2015-04-20 22:54:26+00:00): The wiki's supposed to document tagging practice, not restrict it - if a particular tag has been deliberately used and it's not documented in the wiki it's the wiki that's wrong, not the tag.

If it helps to get another "British English" sense of "building=office" vs "building=offices", I'd certainly have a different mental picture of each (and it's not just about the size of the building - a building set up to contain multiple office will often have different features to one just containing one - shared reception and security might be one example, but there are others).
kechan_tagfix (2023-01-15 14:55:09+00:00): Well...
fkv (2015-05-06 07:42:38+00:00): Same as #30750538 and #30763212. Violation of mechanical edit policy. Please revert.
SomeoneElse (2015-04-20 15:06:54+00:00): Ah - that would explain it.  I saw the logs blocking the previous entrances at the top.
aharvey (2018-04-29 11:47:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339555440 same question about isced level 0
mrpulley (2018-04-30 11:48:08+00:00): ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58552383
user_5359 (2017-06-10 15:41:10+00:00): Hello alv, you use the tag state_date (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pEA), but I think it should be named start_date. Can I change it?
alv (2017-06-10 15:53:06+00:00): True, on buildings and highways it's a josm autocompletion mixup.
user_5359 (2017-06-10 16:38:36+00:00): Thanks, changed!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2015-04-20 20:45:14+00:00): mudando para name:en
robert (2015-04-20 19:36:16+00:00): You seem to have managed to nuke Northern Road out of existence in doing this edit: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=545899
ylark (2015-04-21 11:44:08+00:00): Super, merci !
Minh Nguyen (2015-04-26 22:21:17+00:00): Thank you for taking the time to add these street names in. For legal reasons, OSM can’t accept information copied straight out of another map unless the authors of that map have given permission.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright

Would you mind obtaining permission from the cemetery to copy these names? Better yet, if you’re in the area, you could visit the cemetery and ascertain the names in person. (OSM always prefers on-the-ground local knowledge wherever possible.)

Thanks for understanding!
Jerome50 (2015-04-29 13:40:37+00:00): I was able to drive through the cemetery and verify the names from the street signs posted there.
Minh Nguyen (2015-04-29 16:07:46+00:00): Awesome, thanks for taking the time to do that.
eggie (2018-04-09 18:15:50+00:00): Opnieuw gaan mappen.. dus Opnieuw- Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

..
redd (2025-11-07 12:07:58+00:00): Dieser Satz wurde hier reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36018422
SomeoneElse (2015-06-18 11:23:48+00:00): It looks like you've not accounted for the Bing imagery offset when moving nodes here.  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331916580 is now offset with respect to the GPS traces visible on osm.org.  For example, look at the change on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/291120993/history and the fact that it is now offset from the underlying GPS traces.
axc97c (2015-06-18 11:34:22+00:00): Comparing the tracks here with several GPX files, strava heat map and the bing imagery things look to be aligned correctly to me. Which GPX are you seeing as misaligned to?
SomeoneElse (2015-06-18 11:57:56+00:00): All the GPX traces uploaded to OSM, visible in the editors that support it (i.e. everything but iD, which only shows public ones).  There's clearly a discrepancy between Bing and the underlying GPS traces and OSSV (which mostly agree, as far as you can tell with OSSV).  Even the Strava data shows a small offset from Bing though.

What's the source of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340907861/history ?  There seems to be no underlying Strava data there.
axc97c (2015-06-18 12:01:02+00:00): How far out are you talking about here?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340907861/history - Rode it, have GPX. I assure you it is there. Not much of a path, but it does exist.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-18 13:07:39+00:00): I'd definitely upload any GPS traces to OSM so that they appear to future editors.  I suspect there's a point somewhere between "this is a nice gravel track" and "I can _just_ about get through here on a bike" where we stop adding as paths to OSM - I suspect that different mappers do that at different points :)
kreuzschnabel (2019-02-09 20:56:51+00:00): Was ist http://osm.org/way/339567543, ein Parkhaus? :)
flohoff (2019-02-10 16:04:46+00:00): Puh - gute Frage - Ich vermute mal ich habe da ein wenig überkorrigiert - ist ja auch schon ein bisschen her. Mayen war ein Ausbaugebiet meines ex-Arbeitgebers und ich habe da dann immer erst mir die Daten in OSM angesehen.

Kann ich heute nicht mehr beurteilen. Vermutlich ist das quatsch.

Flo
kreuzschnabel (2019-02-10 16:24:58+00:00): Ist mir auch schon passiert, rechtwinklige Parkplätze mit dem buildings-tool zeichnen und dann das Umtaggen vergessen :)
Weide (2015-04-21 12:25:25+00:00): Bitte nicht die Rolle für amenity=* und public_transport=station (leere Rolle) an platforms und stops schreiben. Diese können nur mit der Rolle "stop" oder "platform" eingetragen werden.
_Martin_M (2015-04-20 17:07:32+00:00): Warum erscheint aufder Standartkarte keine Malerpallette für Künstler/Atelier?
miscosm (2015-04-21 16:33:35+00:00): "sport" sollte mit englischem Text eingetragen werden. Besser: sport=dance

Ich hab das korregiert und noch ein paar Tags ergänzt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3467994745/

Gruß,
Micha
It's so funny (2015-04-24 18:59:00+00:00): Changeset teruggedraaid omdat deze niet met de werkelijkheid overeenkwam. Zie http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=30877
Minh Nguyen (2015-04-26 22:49:07+00:00): Bing aerial imagery in this area is a bit outdated (dating to summer 2010). The Mapbox Satellite layer is more up-to-date at zoom levels 13–17 in Ohio, drawing from NAIP 2013 imagery. You can see the mast’s shadow in that layer.

http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-13 06:53:56+00:00): 1)
what is the source of that import?

what is the license of data being imported?

2)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3468119973 - imported at wrong location

Is it safe to drag it onto building? Or is it going to only mask data quality issue?
Minh Nguyen (2015-04-26 22:42:49+00:00): FYI, man_made=mast is the more appropriate tag for radio/broadcast/cell towers. man_made=tower is for things like watchtowers, and it doesn’t get a special icon on most maps.
hatul (2022-01-12 21:37:02+00:00): יש שני חניוני לילה צמודים באר אשלים ונחל פארן?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3468128701
ttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3468129095/

לפי מפת החניונים של רט״ג יש פה את באר אשלים ואין חניון לילה בשם נחל פארן בכלל.
https://www.parks.org.il/%D7%97%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%99-%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%94-%D7%9C%D7%9C%D7%90-%D7%AA%D7%A9%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%9D/
zstadler (2022-01-12 22:07:11+00:00): בשטח יש שני מתחמים נפרדים. השמות הם, ככל שאני זוכר, מהשלטים במקום

החניון הצפוני הוא לבודדים ולקבוצות קטנות עם מספר אתרי הקמת אוהלים
בוודאי שאין בו מקום ל 400 איש

החנין הדרומי הוא משטח לקבוצות גדולות. בתצ"א טובה אפשר להבחין בגידור האבנים של החניון
geow (2016-07-11 22:02:51+00:00): Hallo Chris und herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Danke für die Erfassung der Häuser hier.  Leider sind recht windschief - aber es gibt einen Trick: 

Jeder Editor hat eine Funktion um Gebäude oder andere Flächen-Objekte rechtwinklig zu machen. In iD dazu einfach das Gebäude markieren und "s" drücken.

Vielleicht hast du Lust, das hier gleich mal auszuprobieren.

Wenn du noch weitere Tipps zum Einstieg brauchst, schau mal auf diese Seiten:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/help

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap

http://learnosm.org/de/

Gruß
geow