piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-10 10:47:02+00:00): Hole number doesn't go in the name
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Frans S (2022-04-23 10:21:53+00:00): Reverted this changeset. See comment on task 206
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120073815
Frans S (2022-04-23 10:23:45+00:00): See my comment on your mapping work. These mappings are reverted.
Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-02 21:44:10+00:00): Please click on the right sidebar and use actual imagery to align roads.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 22:04:45+00:00): i did
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
mueschel (2022-04-30 10:42:07+00:00): Hi,
I found several unusual 'busway:XYZ' tags here. 
The 'busway' tag can only be used to tag the presence of a dedicated lane for buses, but can't be used for bus routes operating on them. These need to be mapped using a relation of type=route, route=bus.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-01 00:35:35+00:00): Sorry, but where in particular do you see the busway tags? I don't remember using the busway tag for anything that wasn't a dedicated bus lane.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-01 01:14:05+00:00): If you mean the ones on North Avenue, the dedicated busway there was installed too recently to be seen on aerial imagery. They started in November 2021: https://northavenuerising.com/dedicated-bus-lanes
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-01 01:14:32+00:00): I did tag the route_ref on the bus lanes to make it clear which bus route the dedicated lanes are for.
mueschel (2022-05-01 09:17:31+00:00): If there is a bus lane, it's fine to add busway tags. But, 'busway' only refers to the physical lane on the road, it can't be used to tag any information about the bus routes that use this lane. 

In particular, these tags can't be used:
busway:from
busway:network	
busway:operator	
busway:route_ref	
busway:to

This information must be put into a bus route relation. And in fact, it is already there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7321499

Btw, "busway:operator" is most likely wrong - this tag would describe the operator and maintainer of the busway itself, which is most likely not the public transport organization.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-02 23:02:38+00:00): > Btw, "busway:operator" is most likely wrong - this tag would describe the operator and maintainer of the busway itself, which is most likely not the public transport organization.

It is operated and enforced by the state Maryland Transit Administration, not the city, this is correct. The public transport infrastructure in the city is operated by the state; if you were to drive into a bus lane, it would be the Maryland Transit Police Force's responsibility, for example. I will remove the others but it is important to clarify the operator.

I had not realized the other variations on busway were so uncommon when I tagged them.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-02 23:04:35+00:00): For reference, generally speaking in Baltimore public transit = state operated; highways and roadways = city operated (we have no state operated infrastructure for cars, other than the facility where you would get a driver's license).
Frans S (2022-04-23 10:32:44+00:00): Hello. See my previous comment on another project about your mappings. 
This changeset has been reverted as well.
Best regards
Frans S (2022-04-23 10:34:10+00:00): Reverted changeset
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120074116
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_5359 (2022-04-28 16:34:55+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on way https://www.osm.org/way/26274182/history, https://www.osm.org/way/952456924/history. Please check my correction. You modified one key to yes, I assume the key was foot.
bdentremont (2022-04-29 01:34:35+00:00): Absolutely correct.  Thank you for catching that.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-02 21:41:24+00:00): Please trace to available imagery
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-02 21:45:14+00:00): I did, i used Maxar imagery
SomeoneElse (2022-05-02 23:06:08+00:00): No you didn't.
This changeset can be visualised at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120074372 .  That doesn't match Maxar at all.  Only when prompted here did you correct it in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120480540 , which _does_ match Maxar imagery.
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2022-05-03 15:37:00+00:00): I reviewed this changeset, and had a driver attend the area, the current map state reflects the ground truth as of today.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-03 16:26:54+00:00): @Eric - Thanks, good to have confirmation of the names too for these new-build roads.
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2022-05-03 16:29:30+00:00): drv did not see civic road signs yet, but driver confirmed naming with a site foreman, as we actually had a delivery to this location today.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-03 16:32:52+00:00): @Eric No worries - still great to have confirmation.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
CurlingMan13 (2022-04-23 09:48:34+00:00): Pioneer Road does not appear to exist in the correct location on satellite imagery.  It also does appears to connect to the roadway already there, and it was not added as such on OSM.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 16:25:44+00:00): OK, thanks for the info
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 16:55:50+00:00): I can change if you need
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
JuanjoMC (2022-04-23 12:28:29+00:00): Hi,

i added the name (BX73 - Ernest Salu) to this one, it is already on the website.

I think it is a good idea to add the names of those cyclo boxes but I realized that this will trigger validation issues in osmose because, in Brussels,  ' - ' is the multiligual name separator.

Perhaps we should use the en dash (–) as separator here. ASCII code is Alt+0150

Cheers
Thierry1030 (2022-04-23 13:01:50+00:00): JuanjoMC -> for your info: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120081414
I already sent your comment to bxl-forever. 
Are you on the chat in matrix? I propose to coordonate as soon as possible ...
JuanjoMC (2022-04-23 13:18:57+00:00): I am not in the matrix chat. 
Just let me know what naming schema you end up using and I will use it as well, I am fine with both proposals.
Thierry1030 (2022-05-20 09:59:32+00:00): Hello JuanjoMC, I think this is the consensus we came up to with bxl-forever -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8245840532
So add name=* + ref=SK12. OK for you?
JuanjoMC (2022-05-20 15:35:12+00:00): Hi,

fine with me.
I will try to update those that I know, mainly in Laeken and Jette, in the coming days.

Cheers
CurlingMan13 (2022-04-23 09:46:28+00:00): What satellite imagery are you using?  I don't see any actual roads here.

You may be using an "approved" source, but this doesn't always mean it is correct.  Satellite imagery should be used within the ID editor (or JOSM) as much as possible.

In this case, I recommend the edit be reverted and the roads that are actually present be mapped instead.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 16:22:58+00:00): There is roads here and a street sign is located here clearly spelling Bryan Ave
I went down these streets a few times and surveyed as proof
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 16:23:51+00:00): I am not lying
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 16:38:55+00:00): I actually surveyed this area and discovered that yes there are actually roads here and the names match, If you want me to back up my proof, I can 100% answer in detail if you need
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 16:39:36+00:00): I can be of much needed help
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 16:40:05+00:00): I already mapped the roads
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 16:49:12+00:00): These roads are in the correct location and are on point of what Satellite Imagery shows
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-23 16:50:43+00:00): https://shuniahfire.com/2017/04/emergency-road-closure/, mentions Bryan Avenue
CurlingMan13 (2022-04-23 19:12:56+00:00): I actually find it hard to believe you have been down these roads.  But whatever.  Thanks for adjusting the road placement.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-23 04:08:56+00:00): Hola FRESHYA, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado varios objetos y solamente se ha indicado el texto "PLANO GUIA", lo cual no brinda mayor detalle sobre la eliminación realizada, por lo que he restaurado los objetos. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla en el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad peruana. 
Saludos
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-23 13:30:17+00:00): Porque removeu a via interna da SSP da Bahia aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-12.15343/-38.41823 ?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-27 22:42:25+00:00): usuario nao respondeu, então reverti a edição.
archpdx (2022-04-25 05:25:44+00:00): Hi,
Is this mountain bike pitch actually signed as 'Bike Park'? Note that we don't use the name tag to describe features in OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
drivec (2022-05-11 02:34:45+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
user_5359 (2022-04-23 17:12:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! User mueschel has revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
hatul (2022-04-27 18:51:23+00:00): שלום אורי

תודה על התרומה, אבל נקודות של אטרקציה לא מיועדות למידע לגבי עבירות. צריך לערוך את השביל בהתאם לעבירות שלו.
בבקשה שמור על הסדר של המפה, תודה.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:49:27+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:49:35+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-04-23 06:43:13+00:00): 虽然贴边确实真的很讨厌，但是注意文明用语嗷~

当然很感谢您肯做出改进，期待您的后续贡献。

（但是这真的好吗？🐟上钩了，但🐴没了，这一切都值得吗？）
真空中的球形猫 (2022-04-23 06:54:05+00:00): 好的，我下次注意，主要是看到贴边的东西以后头皮发麻实在忍不住了

（已经不能再犹豫了，一定要出重拳）

我下次注意温和一点提醒比较好，不过我并不只编辑重庆，我哪儿都会碰一些的，全国出警。
dentonny (2022-04-23 05:49:03+00:00): wrong comment: should have been 'preparing/clean up after mp-grb import
Mordechai23 (2022-04-24 20:38:51+00:00): what's the source for this name change? According to the legitimate ukrainian administration this town is called Бахмут
gholk (2022-04-23 06:28:10+00:00): 排骨便當有是有麵衣的炸排骨，還不錯
rempshaener (2022-04-23 10:05:35+00:00): Hallo,
in diesem Changeset hast du einige Gebäude auf "terrace" umgestellt. "Terrace" wäre eine Reihung aus Reihenhäusern, also nicht das einzelne Haus, das wäre in der Regel "house".
Magst du das selbst ändern oder soll ich das machen?
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2022-04-25 15:13:24+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe es gerade umgestellt.
Viele Grüße
zstadler (2022-05-26 09:32:33+00:00): הי נועם,

תודה על העדכון

קטע השביל הירוק שמופה בעריכה הזו לא מתחבר לשום כביש או שביל מסומן אחר

אתה יודע איפה הוא מתחיל ולאן הוא ממשיך?

זאב
user_5359 (2022-04-24 10:55:32+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/848559458 What is the meaning of the tag "madrasa ya kiislam mjin kiuyu" = "not exist"?
user_5359 (2022-04-24 11:00:58+00:00): Hello (again). Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987603061. What is the meaning of "Njia ya Mjini kiuyu to Bandani /chamanangwe" = "not exist"?
Jrachi (2022-07-13 10:50:22+00:00): Ciao.
Hai messo ford=yes sul sentiero, dovrebbe essere solo sul nodo dove tocca il corso d'acqua
Shaun das Schaf (2022-04-26 19:54:55+00:00): Hallo DeusExtimus, willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte gruppiere deine Änderungen in Zukunft bitte räumlich.
D.h. nicht eine Änderung in Braunschweig durchführen und im gleichen Änderungssatz auch noch eine Änderung 650 km weiter südlich im Allgäu. Das macht es für andere Leute schwierig die Änderungen nachzuvollziehen.

In Braunschweig hast du zudem etliche (vormals auf der Karte rechtwinklige) Gebäude "detailliert", die jetzt alle krumm und schief dargestellt werden. Ich glaube nicht, dass die Gebäude in echt ebenfalls so krumm und schief sind, oder doch? Da wurde leider meiner Meinung nach der Zustand durch die Änderungen eher verschlechtert.

Ein Tipp für die Zukunft: Mit der Taste "Q" kannst du im Editor ein Gebäude oder auch eine andere Fläche rechtwinklig machen.

Bitte nutze das noch und bringe die von dir geänderten Gebäude wieder in eine rechtwinklige Form.

Danke und viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
jyg1093 (2025-08-16 14:23:30+00:00): JOSM 편집
kartonage (2022-04-28 05:04:03+00:00): hej,

this is not an active airport, so please don't tag it as one. I have reverted your changes.

Please also use descripte changeset comments. Thanks

Best regards
osmviborg (2022-04-23 09:04:32+00:00): Det var så en fejl. Området eksisterer: https://vis.dataforsyningen.dk/steder/12337669-d570-6b98-e053-d480220a5a3f
AlexMetalex (2022-04-23 09:41:11+00:00): Min fejl så ja. Jeg så ikke noget om det på nettet ej hellere ikke googlemaps men næste gang kigger jeg på dataforsyningen.dk. 
jeg kan se at du har rettet den. tak
bxl-forever (2022-04-23 10:35:39+00:00): Hello,

A name like "SK62 - Van Hammée" gets detected as a multilingual name because it contains the " - " string.

If the name must absolutely be written like this, I suggest using the ndash character " – " instead.
Otherwise, I recommend the following scheme:
name=Van Hammée
ref=SK62
Thierry1030 (2022-04-23 11:21:09+00:00): I based myself on this example mapped by elucci -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9512308318 and by the info in https://app.cycloparking.brussels/parkings
so what's your preference? I don't care so much ...