piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-31 13:28:06+00:00): ogólnie popieram, mam to na liście - ale jest na niej też kilkaset innych pozycji

więc jak ktos ma ochotę to zachęcam.

jak ktoś chce ale nie wie jak je znaleźc - mogę pomóc
user_5359 (2023-08-31 15:29:03+00:00): you can query the use of the brand "Heated Tobacco" with taginfo (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Heated+Tobacco#values). The use of the three keys name, brand and amenity (rather an error) can be seen in the overpass query https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1zEM. In blue circles the object is marked with shop=tobacco and in black circles with shop= e-cigarette. The red circles have no key shop or any other shop value (the three are identical with amenity="Heated Tobacco"). Except for the amenity entries, which I will correct in a moment, I cannot find any entry errors. Whether the data comes from a permitted or fictitious source, I cannot assess. A simple statement is not enough for a deletion. 

Możesz zapytać o użycie marki "Heated Tobacco" za pomocą taginfo (patrz https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Heated+Tobacco#values). Użycie trzech kluczy nazwa, marka i udogodnienie (raczej błąd) można zobaczyć w zapytaniu wiaduktu https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1zEM. Niebieskie kółka mają obiekt shop=tobacco, czarne kółka mają shop= e-papieros. Czerwone kółka nie mają klucza shop ani żadnej innej wartości shop (trzy są identyczne z amenity="Heated Tobacco"). Z wyjątkiem wpisów amenity, które za chwilę poprawię, nie mogę znaleźć żadnych błędów we wpisach. Nie potrafię ocenić, czy dane pochodzą z autoryzowanego czy fikcyjnego źródła. Zwykłe oświadczenie nie wystarczy do usunięcia.
s0mik (2021-07-17 10:44:56+00:00): Вчера возле источника Серафима никакого блока не встретил, кроме агрессивного охранника)
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-07-17 10:57:17+00:00): А я охранников не видел. Блоки могли убрать, там министройка шла какая-то.
philippec (2021-06-28 13:02:20+00:00): philippelaatditwegcasteleyn
geen puntje
bij hotmail
Sandal man (2021-06-28 14:37:27+00:00): Hola, no creo que el nombre de la calle sea correcto.
Sandal man (2021-06-28 14:41:39+00:00): tal vez agregar: 
highway=pedestrian
 +
 area=yes
Dawid2849 (2021-06-28 11:31:48+00:00): contact:website też do zmiany :P
ottwiz (2021-06-28 11:29:16+00:00): *töröltem ->volt egy kb 8 tagú meadow landcover import, de mivel azt nagyrészt erdő borította így jobbnak találtam a törlését.
iWowik (2021-07-04 04:14:28+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Выполняйте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании дорог
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
gileri (2021-07-01 21:04:10+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap. Merci pour cette première contribution !

Je ne suis pas familier avec le lieu, mais en regardant des photos satellite j'ai l'impression qu'il s'agirait plus d'un point d'eau potable plus qu'une fontaine décorative.

Si c'est le cas, il s'agit d'une autre étiquette pour les cartographier : amenity=drinking_water. Sur Maps.me je pense que ça s'appelle "Eau potable".

Éric
Cyclomalo (2021-07-02 09:17:21+00:00): Oui tout à fait, il s'agit effectivement d'eau potable, merci de me l'avoir fait remarquer, je pensais que fontaine=eau potable mais effectivement il y a plus précis 👌
Futur3r (2021-06-28 16:02:25+00:00): Hi,

I don't know if you know, you can use BDOrtho IGN in France, you will have much better imagery.

Thanks for your work
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107085455
DianaDemchuk (2021-06-28 19:23:24+00:00): Hey!

Thanks a lot for the clarification! We actively use these images from BDOrtho IGN in France, but there are times when they do not want to upload and we have to use other official sources.
We will use only up-to-date information, thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Futur3r (2021-06-28 16:40:06+00:00): Salut,

sur les deux labos de Dijon, les données existait déjà, l'un déjà sur un nœud et l'autre sur le poly du bâtiment.

Fait aussi attention, au formatage du numéro de téléphone avec les espaces (ex. +33 3 80 73 96 60)

Merci pour ta contribution !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107087223
Kogacarlo (2021-07-08 19:05:14+00:00): Hoi Joop, op het forum gaat het net over wegen zonder tags. Toen kwam ik dit tegen. Weet jij wat het is? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958838770#map=19/51.43863/5.94174
Joopvdl (2021-07-08 19:22:13+00:00): Ik vermoed dat ik die lijn gemaakt hebt als nieuwe rand van de akkers. Echter is deze lijn overbodig. Ik zal hem aanpassen naar de missende haag rondom het pad richting het monument.
Omegatherion (2021-07-04 09:51:38+00:00): Hallo Klaus,
die 'Ergänzungen' sind unsinnig. 'access=no' ist fast immer falsch.
eggie (2021-08-19 21:50:19+00:00): De zaak wat netter leggen is natuurlijk prima.
gr eggie
Goffredo (2021-06-28 14:56:14+00:00): Ciao Escursionista1983, benvenuto in OSM.
Se permetti un commento sui tuoi ultimi due changeset, i tag di accesso sono intesi per accesso legale. Dunque, bicyle=no, horse=no etc.... significa che esiste un cartello con il divieto, non che è troppo stretto per le bici etc.
Piuttosto, ti consiglierei di inserire il tag width per specificare la larghezza del sentiero, ma non il tag access.
Sicuramente qualcuno abbastanza "forte" da passare in bici anche su un sentiero di pochi cm c'è ;-)
Buon mapping
nitram1234 (2021-07-06 08:32:21+00:00): Great stuff, Daniel!
Nakaner (2021-06-29 09:08:41+00:00): Hallo,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Bei beiden Wegen ist derzeit noch motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry erfasst, d.h. das abweichend vom allgemeinen Benutzungsverbot für alle Verkehrsmittel (Fuß, Fahrzeug, Pferd, …) das Befahren mit Kraftfahrzeugen für land- und forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr erlaubt ist. Ist das so von dir beabsichtigt?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107088680
Michael Kober (2021-06-30 14:08:41+00:00): Hallo Michael,
ja das war beabsichtigt, da dort ein Schild mit "Privatweg - Durchfahrt verboten" steht.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107088680
extreme_wolf (2021-06-28 13:30:02+00:00): "Отмечайте этим тегом только:

официальные, выделенные или благоустроенные места
стихийные места, пользующиеся популярностью у местного населения или туристов
постоянные места отдыха на маршрутах
безопасные места отдыха в опасных районах (например, в горах или болотах)
Не стоит отмечать какое-либо случайное место лишь по той причине, что вы несколько раз там отдыхали."
Futur3r (2021-06-28 15:58:32+00:00): Salut,

pour rajouter des adresse en France, il faut utiliser seulement les tag addr:street et addr:housenumber sur un nœud.

Si tu ne sais pas où le placer, laisse le au milieu du bâtiment.

Et surtout ne pas rajouter la même adresses sur plein d'objets différents.

Merci pour ta contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107088966
raphaelc19 (2021-06-29 16:06:20+00:00): I think we should revert this. The name of the building is not Old Town Coffee, this is the name of the business (in this case, coffee place). It is also inconsistent with every other business in the region.
raphaelc19 (2021-06-29 16:17:12+00:00): My mistake, it is just not consistent with Mercury Lounge. I will just modify to include the tag shop:coffee and set building:retail
Yog Sot (2021-12-12 21:15:48+00:00): skasowałeś linię 717590472, wersja 2
scieżka dalej tam jest
Nie ma wyłącznie mostków
ogarnij pls
user_14619234 (2021-12-13 07:00:45+00:00): ja tych zmian nie robilem, to ktos inny robił
nanzop (2021-12-13 07:01:17+00:00): ja tesz tych zmian nie robilem
Yog Sot (2021-12-13 17:30:40+00:00): Zamknięte 6 miesięcy temu przez nanzop
Więc jednak ty ;d

W końcu zarośnie, bo mało kto wie jak tam wejść od poligonu, ale nie zmienia to faktu, że warto pomysleć zanim coś skasujesz, bo potem nawet nie pamietasz, że ty ;]
nanzop (2021-12-13 18:03:30+00:00): to na razie ja chce zeby to ktos skasowaał
Yog Sot (2021-12-13 18:45:51+00:00): luz
nadleśnictwo niestety nie ma terminu aby odbudować kładkę, więc trochę sobie poczekamy zanim tam znów sobie pochodzimy, niestety
nanzop (2021-12-13 18:52:50+00:00): nic
Commodoortje (2021-07-15 03:39:34+00:00): Hoi Rudy, 
Ik probeer je (ook) een beetje te helpen, om VR IJsselland een beter inzicht te laten krijgen in OSM.
Je hebt hier een serviceweg aangebracht, maar deze is er (volgens mij) in werkelijkheid niet.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958852849
.
Kun je misschien uitleggen wat het doel is van deze toevoeging?
Commodoortje (2021-07-15 03:59:25+00:00): Je hebt een serviceweg genaamd, de Oude Oxersteeg aangbracht.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958852848

Het lijkt erop dat dit een "oude" privé weg is(naar de woning op nummer 3)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/02wrh1hndi9cxut/2021-07-15_05-52-17.jpg?raw=1
Er zijn namelijk 2 "oudere" gebouwen gesloopt en er is inderdaad iets gewijzigd ivm de nieuwe woningen aan een nieuwe straat "Klein Roessink" 
Deze straat mis ik nu nog.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/l82oqd2ymxu3c8g/2021-07-15_05-53-28.jpg?raw=1

Laat even weten of mijn bevinding de juiste is, en als je hulp nodig hebt om dit te realiseren.
Dan wil ik een filmpje maken hoe het te realiseren is.
Rudy_VR_IJsselland (2021-07-15 10:11:39+00:00): Hallo Commodoortje

Fijn dat je ons wilt helpen, als ik het forum lees van “VRT mapt in Hengelo” voelen we ons (de veiligheidsregio’s) niet echt welkom als gebruiker van OSM, maar er zijn ook gebruikers die wel behulpzaam zijn.

De mutaties in de oude Oxersteeg hebben als oorzaak dat de nummering daar complex is ook omdat het niet echt een begaanbare weg voor hulpverleningsvoertuigen is. De ambulancedienst die werkt met CityGis heeft er door CityGis   (die een eigen kaart heeft) 2 wegen in laten tekenen.
Zij vroegen mij dit ook te doen in OSM omdat de navigatie dan beter is. 
Ik heb mij daar door laten leiden wat niet handig is, want wat er niet is, is er niet . Ik haal dat kleine stukje vanaf de Abeelweg weer weg.
De andere bijgetekende Oude Oxersteeg naar nr 3 heb ik om diezelfde reden getekend. Ik zag via StreetSmart dat er toegangspad  vanaf de hoek van de Braam liep en heb de weg toen langs het pand naar nr 3 getekend.
Als deze weg niet meer bestaat zoals ik lees uit jouw commentaar, verwijder ik deze ook .
Ik ga de weg Klein Roessink in ieder geval intekeken.

PS een filmpje is altijd welkom, hier kan ik en mijn collega’s alleen maar van leren
dvdhoven (2021-07-16 13:58:09+00:00): Ik heb vandaag even een tochtje gemaakt en Klein Roessink verkend en deze nu ingetekend.
Voor nr 3 heb ik een serviceroad ingetekend

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Rudy_VR_IJsselland (2021-07-19 09:30:21+00:00): Dick,
Dank je voor je hulp, zo komen we er toch nog uit
whb (2021-07-06 18:24:41+00:00): Guten Tag,

nach diesem Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2743215 habe ich die Position der Bushaltestelle verbessert.
Diese ist bei Mapillary und auch auf den Bing-Bildern sehr gut zu erkennen.
Bitte verifiziere die Positionen von Haltestellen vor Eintragung, wie besprochen, falls, wie hier, entsprechende Quellen verfügbar sind.

Viele Grüße
whb
wies1 (2021-07-07 05:34:53+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. 
Viele Grüße
wies1
wies1 (2021-07-07 05:55:40+00:00): Hallo, 
danke insbesondere auch für den Hinweis auf Mappilary. Mappilary kannte ich bisher noch nicht; habs mir gerade angeschaut und finde es als Quelle für so Manches sehr gut.
Viele Grüße
wies1
Nakaner (2021-06-29 09:23:34+00:00): Hallo,

ist die Straße zur Gemeindestraße abgestuft worden oder hast du das highway=*-Tag aufgrund ihrer Verkehrsbedeutung geändert?

Die Einstufung in OSM richtet sich in erster Linie nach der Verkehrsbedeutung, die Baulast (Land/Kreis/Gemeinde) ist dabei nur ein Hinweis. Beispielsweise ist die Südtangente in Karlsruhe östlich der Anschlussstelle Kühler Krug nur eine Kreisstraße, nicht die B 10, trotzdem erfassen wir sie als highway=trunk (bzw. highway=primary auf Höhe von Durlach-Aue).

Falls die Baulast auf die Gemeinde oder den Kreis übergangen ist, bitte ich dich das Tag ref="L 540" durch old_ref="L 540" zu ersetzen. Denn dann heißt sie nicht mehr L 540.

Aufgrund meiner eigenen Ortskenntnis denke ich, dass die Luitpoldstraße und Bahnhofstraße gerne highway=tertiary bleiben können. Die beiden haben eine gewisse Bedeutung als Straßen, wo der Verkehr in die Nebensträßchen gebündelt wird. Sie sind Vorfahrtsstraßen.

Wie ist eigentlich der Status der L 540 nördlich der Einmündung "In den Niederwiesen"? Dort hast du die Straße so belassen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Veronika1997 (2021-06-29 19:27:49+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. Ich wollte schnell-schnell die Einbahnstraßenregelung in der Bahnhofstr. einpflegen und habe es nicht hinbekommen. Die Baulast ging auf die Gemeinde über. Ich werde den highway-Tag revertieren und stattdessen old_ref verwenden.
Grüße
veronika1997
Bernhard W (2023-05-13 20:16:34+00:00): Die Praxis ist bereits seit 2018 eingetragen, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5569966168
Dieser neuere Eintrag ist doppelt und nach meiner Info an falscher Position.
Bernhard
RoxanneW (2023-05-15 12:27:39+00:00): Habe nochmal in der Praxis nachgefragt: Die Praxis liegt auf der Seite, wo KIK und Penny sind. Bin mir jetzt nicht sicher, wie wir die beiden Einträge am besten zusammen führen.
Roxanne
SafetyIng (2021-06-28 14:55:10+00:00): Ja, die Fläche gehört wohl seit 2018 der Stadt und ist öffentliche Fläche.
https://twitter.com/olaf_meister/status/992814948920299520

https://ratsinfo.magdeburg.de/vo0050.asp?__kvonr=226241
Rusendusen (2021-08-12 17:05:49+00:00): Why did you add back the parking ground? This still is no parking ground!
Recoil16 (2021-08-12 17:25:28+00:00): Because the way had all tags except the actual amenity=parking tag so an accidental removal was likely especially since the changeset that removed the amenity=parking tag makes no mention of why this was at all. In addition, there is close to a dozen vehicles parked there on the latest aerial. So it sure does look like a place used to park vehicles. Even if it is a private parking lot, the amenity=parking tag belongs there. If it is not in fact a parking lot at all then I would suggest you remove the rest of the tags that do not belong there and put a note=* on the way properly describing the situation.
Greetings.
Rusendusen (2021-08-12 17:37:58+00:00): There were only these tags prior to your edits:
access	private
surface	ground
traffic_sign	DE:250,1020-30
vehicle	destination

As I'm local, I need no aerial maps! If any ground a car is able to be parked is marked as parking ground with amenity=parking this would be a clutter and definitely wrong!
Rusendusen (2021-08-12 17:42:58+00:00): Together with that you changed back parts of the LSG to only be forest! 

The NSG Herbringhauser Bachtal is even wrongly marked, etc etc
Rusendusen (2021-08-12 17:46:01+00:00): See history:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399379374
Rusendusen (2021-08-12 17:55:49+00:00): You've done a whole lotta changes within this one changeset, that it's hard to get the whole bunch of them. 

What about a suggestion:
You'll revert the changeset and do more thematic related changesets instead.

I'm surely willing to help with my local knowledge.

Would you mind doing this?
Recoil16 (2021-08-12 17:58:54+00:00): If you maintain that the area in question is not commonly used to park vehicles, then again I implore you to describe the local situation in an appropriate note=*. Anyone I know would look at the aerial and see close to a dozen cars parked next to each other on a small lot near a recreation ground would assume this is a place for parking, even if private.

Moving on, the bounds of the NSG Herbrunghauser Bachtal as entered by me into OSM match practically 1:1 with the LANUV's data, so please back your accusations up with some proof that it is incorrectly marked.
Also I did not remove any part of an LSG. I did remove a duplicate name of the "Naherholungsgebiet Scharpenacken" that was tagged to the forest. There is only one Naherholungsgebiet Scharpenacken, not two.
Recoil16 (2021-08-12 18:04:37+00:00): There is no way in hell I'm reverting this.
Rusendusen (2021-08-12 20:58:36+00:00): Take a look here regarding "NSG Herbringhauser Bachtal":
http://nsg.naturschutzinformationen.nrw.de/nsg/de/fachinfo/gebiete/gesamt/W_006
Rusendusen (2021-08-12 21:05:08+00:00): The "forest" is part of the Naherholungsgebiet!
Recoil16 (2021-08-12 21:35:02+00:00): I still do not see the issue with NSG Herbringhauser Bachtal. Why are we even discussing it here when it isn't even part of this changeset.
If you have a reliablem usable, verifiable source for the border of the Naherholungsgebiet, feel free to adjust the border of way 319561570 accordingly.
bxl-forever (2021-06-28 16:50:09+00:00): Hello,

The cycle tracks have been changed recently.  We map them as cycle lanes, as part of the main way in OSM.

See changeset here, in March: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101661833

You are using "AIV Flanders most recent aerial imagery" to map.  This is not correct.  This is the imagery for Flanders.  We have high-resolution imagery for Brussels (UrbIS).  But more importantly, the area was rearranged very recently.  It looks like you mapped from following an outdated set of images.

I am afraid we will have to delete your changes.
Please do not change anything more here because more changes will make it even more difficult for us to revert your past changesets.

Have a nice day.
landscapemapper (2021-06-28 14:17:55+00:00): Sorry. Wrong account. Should be @landscapemapper.
bxl-forever (2021-06-28 16:59:28+00:00): Reverted by changeset 107100545.

Hello, I see you are new and I am sure you wish to make useful contributions and improve information for cyclists.
However, we had to clean up because you haven’t grasped how OSM data works and your changes were breaking other data.
Bicycle logos or dashed lines along roads are indicated by adding tags on the main road, not by drawing lines along the road.  We already have lots of people who follow cycle infrastructure in Brussels and keep it up to date, and the existing tags were correct.  That explains why we had to reject your changes.
Have a nice day. :-)
maraf24 (2021-06-30 07:12:24+00:00): Wrong building.
maraf24 (2021-06-30 07:16:15+00:00): Sorry, I commented wrong changeset.
kuhni74 (2021-12-17 11:45:33+00:00): bitte um Beteiligung bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2862614
gscholz (2021-07-15 04:38:21+00:00): Hi VitaoSanches22,
this changeset has destroyes the boundary relations of "Central Park Residence" and "Condomínio Jardim Morumbi":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-51.41697&lat=-22.12758&zoom=16

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107092899

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
portalaventura (2021-06-28 17:15:04+00:00): A fonte citada no conjunto de alterações não é suficiente para a alteração significativa da classificação viaria realizada por você.


Você é mais um editor trabalhando para a Apple que ignora a comunidade local. E no caso da alteração na calssificação viária realizada, está ignorando a comunidade estadual e, também, nacional que acordou a classificação viária, especialmente, no nível trunk.

Você é mais um editor da Apple que está provocando retrabalho para  a comunidade local, baseado em fontes fracas, que estão sempre desatualizadas nos locais onde ocorrem obras na cidade.

Parte das suas alterações realizadas nesse conjunto de alterações será revertida.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107093351
Lars_TheViking (2021-06-29 18:44:56+00:00): Hi portalaventura, thank you for your comment on this changeset. My reasoning for making these changes was so that the trunk network, specifically BR-392 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504033185) and BR-158 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697518351), would stay intact with the construction taking place, and the roads following alongside those would qualify as frontage roads based on the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Frontage_road) and thus take a base classification rather than links.
  
My highway classification changes are based around the Brazilian national network documented on the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classificação_das_rodovias_do_Brasil). Additionally, I used Maxar Premium Imagery as the source because it is currently the newest available imagery source in OSM and shows many of the alignment changes taking place due to recent construction.

I appreciate your input on this and going forward I will reach out to you on any major classification changes in Santa Maria.

Tradução automática:
Olá, portalaventura, obrigado por seu comentário sobre este changeset. Meu raciocínio para fazer essas mudanças foi para que a rede tronco, especificamente BR-392 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504033185) e BR-158 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697518351 ), permaneceria intacta com a construção em andamento, e as estradas ao lado delas seriam qualificadas como estradas frontais com base no OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Frontage_road) e, portanto, receberão uma classificação básica em vez de links.

Minhas mudanças na classificação de rodovias são baseadas na rede nacional brasileira documentada no wiki do OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classificação_das_rodovias_do_Brasil). Além disso, usei imagens Maxar Premium como a fonte porque atualmente é a fonte de imagens mais recente disponível no OSM e mostra muitas das mudanças de alinhamento ocorrendo devido à construção recente.

Agradeço sua opinião e, daqui para frente, entrarei em contato com você sobre quaisquer mudanças importantes na classificação em Santa Maria.
Dino Michelini (2021-06-29 08:45:14+00:00): Ciao, nel caricare i dati è buona pratica lasciare dei commenti esplicativi di cosa si è mappato e quali modifiche sono state fatte (vedi [Changeset](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Changeset_Discussions) e [Comment](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:comment)
maraf24 (2021-06-30 07:14:31+00:00): Wrong building, shop is located in Galeria Słowiańska.
ravali_78 (2021-06-29 11:22:58+00:00): Hi Laveure,
I have modified Motorway geometry.Kindly check with 2082806498,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107144295.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107094753
RicoElectrico (2021-06-29 13:01:26+00:00): Cześć, inni mapowicze mają zastrzeżenia do edycji z Waszej organizacji. Dodatkowo, prowadzicie płatne/zorganizowane edytowanie mapy bez powiadomienia społeczności. 

Hi, other mappers have remarks to edits coming from your organization. Moreover, you're conducting paid/organized mapping without notifying the local community.


https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=833799#p83379

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Futur3r (2021-06-28 15:55:33+00:00): Salut,

pas d'accent pour la valeur petanque.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boules=petanque
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107095340