piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2015-05-05 20:06:46+00:00): Eine Sprache reicht aus. :-) Welche du nimmst, ist deine Entscheidung.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2015-05-06 09:04:36+00:00): Danke. :) Ich will mein Deutch verbessern.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
eggie (2017-09-17 07:49:45+00:00): Weer aan het mappen, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen met nuttige links zie ik. Bij deze per PB
Jojo4u (2015-11-12 21:55:14+00:00): Ist http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4867282 wirklich notwendig? Da nach links ein footway weitergeht ist rechts Abbiegen eh die einzige Möglichkeit für Radfahrer. Ist das als doppelte Absicherung gedacht?
Peilscheibe (2015-11-16 10:04:28+00:00): Radfahrer dürfen hier vom Kreisverkehr kommend nur nach rechts Richtung Westen abbiegen. Ob das andere wirklich ein footway ist, muss noch herausgearbeitet werden, die Beschilderung ist, nun, kreativ.
Jojo4u (2015-11-17 18:23:22+00:00): Ok danke. Abbiegerelationen auf cycleways würde ich wenn möglich vermeiden, damit rechnet kaum ein zukünftiger Mapper. Aber solange die Fortführung von dir noch nicht bearbeitet ist sollte es bleiben.
zarl (2016-07-27 15:45:03+00:00): Hi Peilscheibe, der way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23621949 verwendet auch bicycle:oneway statt oneway:bicycle. Aber hier fällt mir das bicycle:backward=no auf. Nach welchem Schema gehst du denn beim taggen von Radwegen vor? Den Key kann ich auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren nicht finden. Die Seite finde ich eigentlich ganz gut, weil da alle unterschiedlichen Szenarien gezeigt werden.
Nochdazu ist auf einer Seite (südlich der Strasse) noch ein zusätzlicher Weg eingezeichnet...

Ich wünsche mir ja echt ein JOSM-Plugin für die Erfassung von Radwegen, das ist inzwischen eine ziemlich komplexe Angelegenheit.

Ciao,
Carl
Peilscheibe (2016-08-03 11:01:59+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, den key/value-Dreher habe ich korrigiert.
Das Befahrensverbot für Fahrräder von Ost nach West existiert tatsächlich, da hat sich die Stadt Stuttgart eine sehr kreative Radverkehrsführung ausgedacht.
maraf24 (2015-05-06 21:52:39+00:00): http://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/pl/?zoom=16&lat=51.09468&lon=16.97794&hill=0#
sefaf (2015-06-07 07:30:08+00:00): 华强北路由于西丽线的修建，现在仍然禁止机动车通行，故希望能还原为原状。另外，关于华强北路和华强南路，您能确定是那样的？
jlcod (2015-05-16 17:15:40+00:00): Hello, the tag highway=unclassified is not suitable for non-motorable paths (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified). Please follow the classifications in the instructions. For non-motorable paths highway=path is suitable. thanks!
sabas88 (2015-05-06 21:09:56+00:00): Uh? Is this an import? the tags are all strange..
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-06 23:37:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30857932 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed and badly executed import. please do not import third-party into OSM without prior consultation.
augxcgrwxo (2015-05-06 08:53:44+00:00): Добрый день, вы могли бы подсказать, откуда информация о новых улицах? по факту они иначе размечены.
Anton Gavrilov (2015-05-08 06:28:18+00:00): Да, в качестве подложки использовал открытые данные с публичной кадастровой карты. Ссылка: http://maps.rosreestr.ru/PortalOnline/?l=15&x=4608869.459720379&y=6944596.237981054&mls=map|anno&cls=cadastre
lcat (2015-05-08 22:02:07+00:00): ойвей, зачем удалил highway=proposed? С кольцами я конечно переборщил, но дорога там однозначно вскоре будет и не факт что ровно по существующей
lcat (2015-05-08 22:57:04+00:00): И вообще, права на адреску из ГКН были непонятные и ГКН не рекомендовали для использования.. Или что-то  все же прояснилось?
Anton Gavrilov (2015-05-12 10:22:11+00:00): Исправил часть улиц (которые ещё не размечены) на highway=proposed.
BushmanK (2015-05-09 19:22:46+00:00): Это что: офис, магазин, склад?
Rudolf Mayer (2015-05-06 17:27:20+00:00): Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204364680 is a golf course? if so, please provide some details, but rather it seems it is just a park, as it was marked before..
tastrax (2015-05-09 07:04:52+00:00): Hi Rudolf - I have edited that back to a Park. Not sure how that happened. Thanks for the advice.
RicoElectrico (2019-02-25 11:08:19+00:00): Cześć, spójrz na uwagę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1688415
Dzięki!
kocio (2019-02-25 11:11:59+00:00): Niestety nie bywam tam, więc nie mam jak sprawdzić.
cadsauxk (2015-07-31 22:36:17+00:00): Por favor, coloque o código da rodovia BR-482 apenas no campo ref. É desnecessário incluir no nome. Obrigado.
ylark (2015-05-27 09:32:17+00:00): Ce point fait doublon avec les tags présents sur le bâtiment.
On ne doit pas cartographier pour les outils, ce sont les outils qui doivent s'adapter à la carte.
MobilEssonne devrait gérer les ways et certainement pas ajouter des nœuds en doublons un peu partout.

Conséquence : https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=mairie+de+yerres
naoliv (2015-05-17 20:19:32+00:00): Roberto, cuidado para não alterar de forma indevida a classificação das rodovias.
Você também excluiu muita coisa válida nessa sua edição.
GerdP (2015-10-13 14:37:45+00:00): please review:
way 43990277 has the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;tertiary

it seems that all roads in this area are either unclassified or tertiary, but I don't 
see a difference between them, so I think
more work is needed ;-)
Jose Riha (2015-05-05 14:19:44+00:00): odkial prosim mate informaciu o dlzni v nazve ulice? podla mojich informacii a takisto stranky hlavneho mesta su vsetky samohlasky v ulici kopcianska kratke (http://www.bratislava.sk/ulice-v-mestskej-casti-bratislava-petrzalka/d-11042601/p1=11049947)
Dmytro O (2016-04-21 19:29:25+00:00): I guess trunk_link should be used as link between two lines
yamaxim (2016-04-22 17:09:22+00:00): Could you fix that if you want? I cannot figure out what you're talking about.
Dmytro O (2016-04-22 17:13:35+00:00): Вы используете highway=trunk в местах разворотов. Правильно использовать trunk_link. Где нашел - поправил.
yamaxim (2016-04-22 17:23:43+00:00): Ну так доходчивей. Просто тяжело понять о чем идет речь. Онлайн редактор OSM очень тугой для просмотра правок. Спасибо, буду знать.
waldhans (2015-05-08 14:44:06+00:00): du hast die Gemeinde-Grenzen zerstoert! Ich werde das jetzt reparieren, aber achte bitte in Zukunft darauf, boundary=administrative nicht zu veraendern!
waldhans (2015-05-08 15:14:40+00:00): Grenze ist ok; war der node 768872758, dabei hast du die grenze gesplittet. 

War die Relation X10 sortiert?
reigi (2015-05-08 15:17:00+00:00): Sorry, wollte nicht die Grenze, sondern den Weg splitten. Danke für das Reparieren. Was bedeutet "War die Relation X10 sortiert?"
waldhans (2015-05-08 15:49:10+00:00): kann dir kein Bild senden, sende eine mail an kurt@waldhans.com, dann schicke ich einen JOSM-dump.

bei X10 liegen benachtbarte Wege liegen in der Relationsliste nicht nebeneinander. Falls ich die Wege in der Reihenfolge der Relation abschreite, gibt das keinen zusammenhängenden Weg. Das ist auch nicht unbedingt noetig, eine Auswertesoftware kann die Teile sortieren.

Ich wollte nur wissen, ob die Wege sortiert waren, oder ob ich da was zerstört habe.
Karnajh (2015-05-05 14:17:06+00:00): Named the whole town actually.
romanshuvalov (2015-05-13 14:23:13+00:00): Если там тупик - на последней точке хорошо бы поставить тэг noexit=yes, чтоб было видно что это именно тупик, а не просто недорисованная линия, как в большинстве случаев. (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:noexit)
GerdP (2015-11-02 14:55:54+00:00): Bitte prüfen: highway=traffic_island
wird selten gebraucht, erst recht bei einer multipolygon relation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4867437
Ist das nicht einfach nur ein landuse=village_green, das von Straßen
eingerahmt wird?
atpl_pilot (2015-11-04 07:45:32+00:00): Der Tag village-green wird nach meiner Kenntnis NUR verwendet, wenn in der Grünanlage regelmäßig öffentliche Veranstaltungen stattfinden, z.B. ein jährlich stattfindender Weihnachtsmarkt.
GerdP (2015-11-04 07:51:33+00:00): danke für die Rückmeldung.
Tatsächlich, das deutsche wiki scheinnt da etwas restriktiver als das englische.
Also ist das tagging der "Insel" selbst durchaus okay, aber warum das unübliche highway=traffic_island
und die mp-relation?
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-09-07 01:12:52+00:00): Hi EdAllen, I changed the classification and geometry this way based on Maxar Imagery Premium (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/343029041). i also made change around this changeset. thankyou
lxbarth (2015-05-14 11:24:20+00:00): How did [node #1382902557](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1382902557) turn into a drinking water fountain?
calfarome (2015-05-14 14:09:53+00:00): Hi lxbarth, I just joined the disconnected streets indicating the to-fix me, probably to join the streets involuntarily  joined the node drinking water that was near.
calfarome (2015-05-14 14:31:35+00:00): I will reverse the change and will be careful in future work. Thank you for your comment.
cw1998 (2015-05-05 17:39:05+00:00): Spam
SomeoneElse (2015-05-06 12:41:17+00:00): While I can see the logic in using animal_boarding instead of boarding, was this change mentioned anywhere public so that people who might be using "boarding" on a map or in a data extraction get to know about it before it happens?
R0bst3r (2015-05-06 13:31:08+00:00): Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_boarding Approved in 2012. But my 6 changes were not announced officially. 

IMHO: This change is improving the usage of data for extractors. Complexity for queries is reduced and better results are given.
vasony (2015-09-17 13:44:27+00:00): Szia!
A Benu gyógyszertárat 2x vitted fel, melyik a jó?
will_p (2015-05-05 16:57:30+00:00): The railway lines now differ from what is shown on the Bing imagery around Trent Junction. Please could you confirm the source for the changes you have made. If you have knowledge of recent changes that's great, but it's helpful to cite a source so other mappers can double check the changes.

My concern is that there is now no direct connection between Trent Junction and Sheetstores Junction. Surely that route is used by trains heading between Derby and the south?
Hjart (2015-05-05 20:12:40+00:00): Hej og velkommen til vores projekt. Er du lokalkendt?
Bigdamkjaer (2015-05-06 05:54:06+00:00): Ja. Det tør siges. Jeg er ny i denne app. Derfor har jeg eksperimenteret lidt.
Harry Wood (2015-05-12 19:41:53+00:00): Good wheelmapping!  We need to do more of this in the area. If you're still around to do some mapping here, check out this event were doing tomorrow night! http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/London#Upcoming_Events
Rudolf Mayer (2015-05-06 17:30:46+00:00): You removed a lot of useful golf & address tags from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31960569

=> can you fix that?
kartler175 (2015-05-07 06:59:45+00:00): Die Daten habe ich von der Fläche auf den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3502403268 beim Klubhaus übertragen. An der Fläche ist die Lage einer Adresse undefiniert.
Rogehm (2015-05-11 16:49:41+00:00): Sorry, please don't tag tree rows with natural=tree_group, but as natural=tree_row. Thanks.

Rogehm (Germany)
tf94 (2015-05-11 16:55:13+00:00): OK
sabas88 (2015-05-06 21:15:40+00:00): Hi,
please note that generally the tags are lowecase :-)
sabas88 (2015-05-06 21:15:55+00:00): *lowercase
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:12:28+00:00): Correção de Etiquetas
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:12:03+00:00): Correção de Etiquetas
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:11:43+00:00): Correção de Etiquetas
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:11:18+00:00): Correção de Etiquetas das Ruas. Rua das Rosas e Rua das Papoulas.  A Rua das Rosas estava denominada como Rua das Papoulas.
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:10:19+00:00): Correção das etiquetas das ruas, Rua das Papoulas e Rua das Rosas.
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:13:46+00:00): Inclusão de Pista de Cooper
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:14:27+00:00): Inclusão de pista de cooper e etiqueta da lagoa.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-12 16:51:19+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3258540 ?
Władysław Komorek (2022-07-13 08:55:10+00:00): Done.
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:14:55+00:00): Inclusão de pista de cooper
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:15:17+00:00): Inclusão de Campo de Futebol
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:16:05+00:00): Inclusão da praça
Edson Piramo (2015-05-05 19:16:41+00:00): Inclusão do pátio do centro cultural
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-09-21 00:05:44+00:00): I changed the classification and geometry  of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/343049853). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
scai (2015-05-06 17:34:17+00:00): Bitte nicht Name mit description oder note verwechseln. Name ist immer nur der offizielle Name, "Wasserzugang" ist aber sicher kein offizieller Name. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
scai (2015-05-12 17:39:20+00:00): Habs gefixt. highway=yes ist ebenso kein gültiger Tag, das habe ich gleich mit behoben.

Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31060148
gormo (2015-05-08 16:08:06+00:00): Is there consensus to use idp:site instead of idp:camp_site? http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1024 says to use "idp:camp_site".
smaprs (2015-05-08 23:51:47+00:00): Sorry, and thanks.
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-09-10 06:57:45+00:00): Hi EdAllen
I've fixed this waterway
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30820742), because there are crossing between this highway. Thank you
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-24 12:03:59+00:00): Hi, EdAllen. I have adjusted the primary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/343059682) based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
Eric38fr (2015-05-05 19:55:50+00:00): #hotosm-project-1018
Eric38fr (2015-05-05 19:56:22+00:00): #hotosm-project-1018
olehz (2018-10-08 21:48:28+00:00): Окремі елементи, що входять до складу університету не повинні позначатись теґом amenity=university: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Tag:amenity=university
Myazyk (2018-10-23 17:58:59+00:00): Ну то познач їх теґом, яким вони мають позначатися (якщо такий існує)
CAI Stabia (2015-05-07 14:27:48+00:00): Ciao ASGU, come mai hai cancellato le informazionitecniche  riguardanti il faro di punta Campanella? Assegnare al faro il nome RUPI E BAGNO non ha alcun significato in Openstreetmap. Se vuoi dei consigli sono a tua disposizione. Fà attenzione però prima di effettuare modifiche.
Deanna Earley (2015-10-20 15:57:40+00:00): I know it can be hard to verify data you upload, but you may want to check that you're not marking major trunk roads as a dirt surface :)
I've now corrected a few segments that were causing routing oddities.
jpennycook (2015-10-20 19:56:48+00:00): Oops - sorry about that.  Thanks for fixing my mistakes - when I get chance, I'll double check that changeset to see if there were any more problems.
StefanB (2015-05-20 03:34:02+00:00): Živijo!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4480260
Ime "G" se sedaj pojavlja v zemljevidih... kaj naj bi pomenilo? Bodisi ga je potrebno spremeniti v kaj bolj smiselnega (preimenovati) ali odstraniti.
Lp,
Štefan
StefanB (2015-05-20 10:22:01+00:00): Zaenkrat sem odstranil moteče ime "G"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31310179

lp,
Štefan
Diomas (2015-05-13 17:15:48+00:00): Когда это там светофоры успели появиться? Сегодня днем не было.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-25 16:50:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31450935 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by user drakopineda since some are clearly fictional e.g. changeset 30174273, casting doubt on the veracity of the rest, and no answer was received about it from the user.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-25 16:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31450935 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by user drakopineda since some are clearly fictional e.g. changeset 30174273, casting doubt on the veracity of the rest, and no answer was received about it from the user.
luiswoo (2015-05-06 13:19:35+00:00): Этот новый запрет, точно "налево запрещено"? А то он выполнен как только прямо или проезд прямо запрещён
http://map.comlu.com/?zoom=18&lat=47.227022&lon=39.716002&layer=Grayscale&overlays=TTT
Nakaner (2015-05-13 15:32:34+00:00): Ich bezweifle sehr, dass das Gebiet "Freiham_Nord Quatier für 20000 Bewohner" heißt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
BeKri (2015-05-13 23:10:41+00:00): Servus,
recht hast Du,
keine Ahnung, was mich da geritten hat.
Danke für's ausbessern
Tomio (2015-05-11 11:23:08+00:00): anor, vi que vc apagou a tag place=town da cidade de Gaspar e incluiu o admin_centre.
A tag place=town não deve ser usada?
chnav (2015-05-07 18:35:09+00:00): Подобные названия вносятся в loc_name ("местечковое название") или description ("описание"). Я исправил.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:51:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:50:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
Tomas Straupis (2015-05-06 05:30:00+00:00): Apparently incorrect advice by map roulette. I will revert this changeset, because it destroys correct data about road classification and surface.
freeExec (2015-05-06 07:15:31+00:00): Не надо удалять геометрию, когда можно было передвинуть здание. Ну и МФЦ никак не извлечение прибыли, поэтому тип здания не commercial
ILDAR911 (2015-05-07 05:20:17+00:00): А какая разница, передвинуть, или нарисовать новое по контурам?
ILDAR911 (2015-05-07 05:22:46+00:00): и это... ты с Дрожжаного? Может дорисуешь по-мелочи, школы там, ДК, ЦРБ? А то у других сервисов тоже беда с картографией в этом районе...
freeExec (2015-05-07 10:26:59+00:00): Вся суть в истории объекта: где оно стояло раньше, как называлось, какой номер был, всё это можно было бы узнать :(
И нет, я далеко, что бы мелочи рисовать, максимум это домики по спутнику.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:56:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
Durko_freemap (2015-05-06 12:29:21+00:00): Ahoj Peto,
mas pravdu tu trat(motokrosovu) uz museli zrusit.
Durko
Peter Vojtek (2015-05-06 13:49:33+00:00): ok, je prec:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30843158
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:51:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
FreedSky (2015-05-06 06:25:35+00:00): 我在编辑你动什么 全没了！
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:52:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
R0bst3r (2015-11-19 12:33:37+00:00): Hi ulil, you have changed the "horse=yes" tag to "s=yes" at node http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260281348. Was this intended?
user_16881 (2015-11-19 13:22:42+00:00): Hi R0bst3r,
Thank you for informing me about that mistake. This happens sometimes to me when typing the shortcut "s" for "save" while the tag field is active... and consequently the tag is replaced by the letter 's' instead of being saved. Sorry. and thank you, once again.
Greetings,
uli.l
SomeoneElse (2015-05-06 12:27:28+00:00): This has just popped up in a whodidit feed, so there's an edit local to me somewhere.  How do I find out where, though?  What was the self intersection and where was it?
Dmitry Ganaev (2015-05-07 05:25:36+00:00): Изменил настройки шлагбаума - открыл его для всех видов передвижений, т.к. до этого не корректно строились велосипедные и пешие маршруты.
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-14 22:56:38+00:00): Sinds wanneer rijden we binnen de bebouwde kom op dit stukje industrieterrein 70 km/h
dvdhoven (2019-11-15 08:59:03+00:00): Ook hier geldt, het betreft een oeroude changeset. Als je bij de mapper kijkt, zul je zien dat hij enkele changesets in 2015 heeft gedaan en daarna niet meer actief geweest is. De kans, dat hij nog reageert, schat ik niet zo groot in.
In zo'n geval kun je stilzwijgend de snelheid aanpassen naar de snelheid, die jij hebt waargenomen.
Bij de Fietsersbond geldt een termijn van een jaar, waarop je nog bij wijzigingen contact moet opnemen met de vorige mapper. Bij OSM geldt dat niet, er is geen richtlijn voor. Maar ook hier kun je iets dergelijks hanteren.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 21:11:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
Jimmy_K (2015-05-06 08:06:58+00:00): source: geoimage.at + survey
tenten66 (2015-05-06 09:24:55+00:00): Commento errato...
Quello giusto e' :
Svincolo di collegamento tra Tangenziale Nord (A52) e Rho Monza (SP46) on passa piu' per la Milano Meda (ss35).
Al momento c'e' un percorso dedicato che dalla A52 Porta alla SP46 (non viceversa)
Inoltre dalla A52 al momento NON si puo' entrare nella SS35 come accadeva prima.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 21:09:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
dudka (2015-05-06 09:41:22+00:00): слідкуй будь ласка за пирогом
http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/497
я цей квартал саме зараз редагую
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 21:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-06 12:45:16+00:00): Any reason you've changed "historic=Martello tower" to "historic=yes" here?
lutz (2015-05-06 14:10:22+00:00): I changed "historic=Martello tower" to "man_made=tower" + "historic=yes"

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=man_made%3Dtower

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=historic%3DMartello+tower
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:52:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 21:03:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
d1g (2015-05-06 12:51:12+00:00): Пользователя лучше бы писал или нормера пакетов, что откат понятно по created_by=reverter_plugin, а то рамка на полстраны вышла :)
Cd_spb (2015-05-06 13:09:30+00:00): Принято, не предполагал что там задействованы настолько большие отношения.
Начало обсуждения - здесь. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=499733#p499733
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 21:02:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:55:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:58:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
Hjart (2015-05-08 16:54:44+00:00): Jeg har nu ryddet op i området her. Bemærk at det ofte er lettere at se detaljer på Geodatastyrelsens fotos + at de generelt er mere akkurate end Bings
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-07 20:57:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30885223.
eggie (2021-01-15 09:34:20+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2019-08-18 09:45:29+00:00): Hello,
Hope you don't mind me asking about a change from 4 years ago!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219780123/history has a source of "Google Maps" on it (that source dates to a couple of years before your edited it).  Was your edit based on a visit or local knowledge?  If so, we can leave the data in OSM on that basis.  If not, we'll probably have to remove the name.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
smb1001 (2019-08-21 10:08:04+00:00): Hi Andy,
I had been to Norfolk back then but I think most of my change was landuse improvements based on Bing maps tracing. I certainly didn't add the source as Google Maps as I know we can't use that, so it was whoever added it originally that put that. I suspect I converted an existing node with the name to the current way based on Bing, but don't know about the name. I agree it looks like whoever put it originally got the name from Google Maps so do remove.
smb1001 (2019-08-21 10:55:02+00:00): Ahem, I mean Lincolnshire. My county knowledge is pretty good, I promise : )
SomeoneElse (2019-10-26 11:48:53+00:00): Thanks - I did remove the name (just forgot to mention it here - sorry about that)
d1g (2015-05-06 12:54:42+00:00): Добрый день! Всегда хотел спросить: как у жителей адрес в паспорте написан? Вы живёте в этом доме?