piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2020-05-16 13:29:06+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please don't make changes to the OSM database to suit your own purposes. Features added to or amended on OSM must be verifiable.

At least part of the way you tagged as grass is asphalt,and at least part is a route with public access, bicycle. 

Regards Bernard.
Robclifton9 (2020-05-16 13:40:35+00:00): You can see on google street view that only about half of the route from Crab's Green Farm has any sort of paving, the remainder returns to grass/mud path. Please let me know how this should be edited. It's not for my own means, it's to advise other road cyclists that you can't pass down this route. 

Thanks,
Rob
BCNorwich (2020-05-16 14:05:12+00:00): Hi Rob,
Using Google map data even derived data infringes Googles copyright. So it's best not to even mention Google when mapping to OSM. 
I can see the western half is asphalt, I've tagged that half bicycle=yes, foot=yes, highway=service, surface=asphalt which I think is correct. The eastern half looks like a farm track, I've tagged it foot=yes, highway=track, tracktype=grade4
Track-types are described here :-https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype

I hope this helps, please feel free to amend the tags to your knowledge bearing in mind that tags should reflect ground truth and be verifiable.

Regards Bernard.
Robclifton9 (2020-05-17 08:51:44+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thanks for the information, understood. I have been along the track so I was just confirming it. I realise I should have tagged as you have now, so thanks for your help.

Rob
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-17 19:37:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25962770/history - have you meant surface=compacted ?
user_2066394 (2020-05-16 13:21:06+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85303467
user_2066394 (2020-05-16 13:22:11+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85303603
jEmqo (2020-05-16 19:32:54+00:00): das entspräche nicht den Gegebenheiten vor Ort, da nach Umbau keine visuellen Anzeichen einer Bäckerei mehr vorhanden sind
user_2066394 (2020-05-16 19:40:24+00:00): und aktuell ist leerstand? wie kennzeichnet man den?
jEmqo (2020-05-17 19:27:15+00:00): Der Bäckereiladen wurde aufwändig in ein Wohnhaus umgebaut.
eggie (2020-05-16 13:46:03+00:00): Dag chenderman.. Heeft je ingetekende highway=residential ook een naam? 
MVG,
Eggie
AndersAndersson (2020-05-16 20:17:40+00:00): Is this a sculture or someone making sculptures?
think!! (2020-05-16 20:50:08+00:00): Thanks for the comment. It is a sculpture, was wrong in the database. So i fixed it to be a sculpture and added A.M. as the artist as it says on the sign on the floor.
AndersAndersson (2020-05-16 22:04:33+00:00): Very nice. Good work!
AndersAndersson (2020-05-16 20:18:55+00:00): I OSM verkar Ulvsbo inte ligga i Dalarna.
Essin (2020-05-17 10:57:35+00:00): Det ligger inte i Dalarnas län, och det är korrekt. Däremot ligger det i landskapet Dalarna, men landskapet är inte inlagt på OSM än. Jag har funderat på att göra det, men avvaktar tills Ekonomiska kartan-TMS:en är på banan igen.
AndersAndersson (2020-05-18 06:36:58+00:00): Ok, jag förstår.
drnoble (2020-05-17 09:47:23+00:00): This area is still blocked off by heras fencing, which I have now mapped
JezCrow (2020-05-18 19:52:49+00:00): Hi Dan, welcome to OSM!
I see you've requested a review - you've made a great start with tracing the buildings but there are a couple more steps to refine the outlines:
1) 'Squaring' (shortcut: Q) each building to make the corners right-angles.
2) Move (shortcut: M) each outline to ground floor level.
Happy mapping :)
Jez
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:12:34+00:00): Hello!

You used
amenity=event_venue
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7526442298/history

Have you maybe meant
amenity=events_venue
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
escada (2025-04-29 08:41:43+00:00): It's a typo. feel free to fix it.
Unfortunately, I can't spend much time on OSM at the moment.
user_2066394 (2020-05-16 20:54:09+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85305864
Ravrol (2020-06-03 07:59:13+00:00): Hätte disused verwendet, wenn der Laden aktuell leerstehen würde. Aber da die Verkaufsfläche vom Wirtshaus übernommen wurde, das im Haus nebenan fehlplatziert war, meine ich das löschen hier def. richtig is^^
hsc666 (2020-05-16 15:28:15+00:00): Das disused: kommt nur vor den Key, nicht an den Wert. Also z.B. disused:amenity=bank.
eggie (2020-05-16 15:46:55+00:00): Dag Gerard...  Is dit de plek waar ik moet zijn om  m'n band te plakken.
Is het bedrijf hier fysiek aanwezig? Of kan je bijdrage op woning nr 19?

MVG,
Eggie
Hjart (2020-05-17 04:07:33+00:00): Velkommen til vores lille projekt og tak for dine bidrag. Bemærk dog at navnefeltet ikke bør udfyldes med andet end egentlige navne (og således ikke med beskrivelser, som f.eks. "Gangsti").
AndersAndersson (2020-05-16 20:17:06+00:00): Hello,
Nice additions.
I just wonder why you name them in German? You can use name:de if you also want to name it in German.
SETOENG (2020-05-16 20:22:42+00:00): Hi,
The name on the information board showing the paths are in Swedish and German. The place is run by the orienteering club in Ludvika and I guess the normally have a lot of guests . from Germany in the summer. Thanks for the tip on the language tag. There are many functions in Open Street map.
AndersAndersson (2020-05-16 20:35:42+00:00): I see.
Then using name:de for the german name is the right thing to do.
Thank you for your answer and please continue with your good mapping. :)
berndw (2020-05-16 15:50:38+00:00): Danke!
mariotomo (2020-08-17 23:22:45+00:00): hola.  buscando en Panamá los objetos con el nombre "Iglesia", encuentro aquí dos, un edificio y un punto.  creo que uno de los dos se podría borrar, qué opinas?
eggie (2020-05-16 16:24:30+00:00): Dag Oliver,

Je vraagt om een review.. Eigenlijk zou je de hoofdrijbaan waar je naar het fietspad moet op slot moeten zetten met bicycle=use_sidepath  .
Bij die nieuwe constructie heb ik de hoofdrijbaan vast gesplitst. 
En dan goed aan de zw kant kijken wanneer dan ok welk gedeelte op slot kan. Op een gegeven moment begint ook daar bicycle=no ( dat gebruiken we bij een fietsverbod) Er zal dan daar een bord moeten staan? Vanaf de Margrietlaan? 

MVG,
eggie
Oliver Piper (2020-05-16 17:31:34+00:00): Hallo eggie,

Dank voor je reactie.
Als ik de hoofdrijbaan daar op slot moet zetten, moet ik dat stuk weg dus splitsen bij het begin van het fietspad, toch? Moet ik dan letten op relaties zoals de busverbindingen, of worden die automatisch naar beide gesplitste delen overgenomen?
Aan de ZW-kant klopt nog wel meer niet aan de Vlodropperweg, zoals bv. de noordelijke ventweg tussen Margriet- en Irenelaan. Die wordt bij Google Maps (sorry voor het vloeken in de kerk) wel correct weergegeven. En dat stukje ventweg dat aansluit op de Trambaan is met een fietssluis afgesloten voor auto's. Daar is vast ook een optie voor, die ik nog niet heb gevonden.
Wat betreft het fietsverbod op een stuk van de hoofdrijbaan, heb ik mijn twijfels of dat überhaupt rechtsgeldig is: bij de Irenelaan/Wilhelminalaan staan nl. geen verbodsborden. Maar ik heb het vermoeden dat dat hele stuk binnen afzienbare tijd nog op de schop gaat.
En nog een vraag: heel Posterholt is nu 30km-zone. Is dat in één keer aan te passen?
Oh, en nóg een vraag: sommige stukken weg hebben de waarde highway=unclassified en een aansluitend stuk is opeens highway=residential. Wat is gangbaar bij welke toepassing? (Ik heb nog niet op het forum of  in een handleiding gezocht)
En je had gelijk: JOSM is stukken beter/handiger dan iD. Dat heb ik nu na twee dagen experimenteren al in de gaten.

Groetjes, Oliver.
eggie (2020-05-16 17:53:01+00:00): Met het laatste beginnen...
Alle niet doorgaande straten zijn eigenlijk highway=residential..
Doorgaande straten blijven unclassified.
Nog een erfenis van een donatie van kaartenmaker AND, (residential bestond toen nog niet)
Dus gewoon omtaggen. 
Splitsen heb ik bij de constructie al gedaan. Met josm gaat het meestal goed, (soms gaat de retour route verkeerd)  maar ik splits altijd op één punt en niet op twee punten tegelijk. Dan gaat het meestal goed. 
Leo Slager kijkt meestal mee met routerelaties. Dus gewoon doen.
Ik had een een stukje gesplitst overigens. 
30 km in één keer zou ik niet doen. Dat zijn mechanical edits en dat gaat zonder ervaring vaak fout en is aan regels gebonden. Niet doen dus. 

Fietssluis...  Kijk eens bij barrier  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:barrier

en anders is er nog altijd barrier=yes

Tip..Wanneer je de BGT omtrekgericht  over je foto zet zie je precies hoe de wegen lopen.
BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021

Succes,
Eggie
Oliver Piper (2020-05-16 18:08:58+00:00): Dankjewel voor de tips! Ik ga ermee aan de slag.
eggie (2020-05-16 16:12:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Svp niet dubbel taggen. Maak een keuze .. of alles op het gebouw .. of alles op de adresnode ..
denomination ontbreekt nog.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination
MVG,
Eggie
JodaStephen (2020-05-17 11:09:09+00:00): Hi,I understand that you are improving the golf information, and that is great, but the car park parking_aisle is clearly correct and shouldn't be removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85308004
Kautilya3 (2020-06-06 07:20:46+00:00): This border was supposed to represent that from the LSIB3 database. You cannot modify it as per the Chinese maps. It is an international line.
chachafish (2020-05-16 23:18:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits to the map :)
BuckTheGauchos (2020-05-21 16:53:27+00:00): thanks! if you notice anything I should have done differently or better please let me know.  There is a large barrier to entry with OSM and I want to make sure I'm doing things right.
chachafish (2020-05-21 20:48:26+00:00): No probs. If you want to see what the local Colorado OSM community is up to, many of us are on Slack #local-colorado
BeKri (2020-05-19 06:14:22+00:00): Servus tux67,
zu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302462869
wird "nur" der Teil der Brabanterstraße zusammengeschrieben oder auch der südliche Rest ?
Gruss derBeKri
tux67 (2020-05-19 06:42:39+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis .. natürlich die ganze Straße ;-)
Gruß
tux67
Mark R Naird (2020-05-16 19:12:20+00:00): Why are you deleting existing roads?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85309597
Avilaba (2020-05-17 16:27:29+00:00): This project only request to map buildings, nothing else. In some occasions, the roads mapped are not correct and don't allow to map correctly the buildings.
Predatorix (2020-10-01 14:44:08+00:00): This is incorrect. The watertower of Dahme/Mark is at 51.86694, 13.41782. The tower at the point you marked was at any time a watchtower known as "Vogelturm". Therefore I will remove your entry.
eggie (2020-05-16 17:37:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
SammysHP (2020-05-20 16:50:55+00:00): Moin knoefix,
 
EasyPark ist nicht der Betreiber der Automaten, das ist die Stadt Celle. EasyPark ist nur ein Dienstleister für "Handyparken", also eine Art virtueller Parkschein. Ich habe die operator-Tags entsprechend angepasst.
 
Viele Grüße
SammysHP
tuxayo (2020-05-20 12:11:36+00:00): Bonjour,

Est-ce qu'on a une source pour que le gestionnaire c'est la Ville de Marseille pour les caméra sans panneau?

Je pense que sur les caméras où c'est "évident" les deux sont valides et c'est plus une préférence personnel de mettre ou de laisser vide.
Ciriol (2020-05-20 13:05:02+00:00): Salut,

En fait que le tag était déjà là, je l'ai laissé. Je suppose que le panneau à été arraché. Je ne l'ajoute que sur celle où je peux le constater.
Michael712 (2020-07-08 18:30:28+00:00): Could you please explain, why you changed the highway class to unclassified?
According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified#Abgrenzung_von_highway.3Dunclassified_und_highway.3Dservice_und_highway.3Dtrack_tracktype.3Dgrade1 this way should better be mapped as a track, as it was before.
Martin Borsje (2020-07-08 18:37:41+00:00): It is an asfalt road just as any other; while a tracj is more an unsurfaced road with a width to allow agricultural traffic.
Michael712 (2020-07-09 06:21:37+00:00): I'm sorry but I have to disagree. Many roads that are paved (with asphalt) are tagged as highway=track due to their usage as "agricultural road". If you have a look at surrounding roads you will find a lot of ways where highway=track, tracktype=grade1 and surface=asphalt/paved. I.e., according to your logic all of those ways should be tagged as highway=unclassified. However, as those roads are only used by farmers to access their fields, they are commonly tagged as tracks (at least in Germany).
Rule of thumb: Only agricultural/forestry access: highway=track. Open to all motorized traffic: highway=unclassified/service/etc.
Please revert your changes. Thanks.
If you have more questions, feel free to PM me.
Martin Borsje (2020-07-09 06:48:46+00:00): H'm....
Quite som of these 'tracks' are open to 'normal' motor vehicles and certainly to cyclists.

Even cycle routes are following these roads.
So certainly not only for agricutural vehicles.
Many cycling routers avoid tracks (for normal/racing cycles, not for ATB/gravel profile) and do not avoid unclassified.
That was the reason. But I would not further argue; what is the objection to have this specific highway tagged as unclassified?
Michael712 (2020-07-09 07:16:46+00:00): Ok, I totally follow your argument regarding the cycling routers (I often use those and wonder why they don't use tracks). However, to improve the routing we could add tags describing the smothness, as this is often used by bicycle routers to determine usable roads.
My objection is that with looking on the map (e.g. slippy map on openstreetmap.org) one should be able to determine whether a way/road is accessible or not. Mapping it as a track makes it clear, that no regular motor vehicles may use this road. Leaving it as unclassified may lead to the understanding, that this is an allowed shortcut (here: between "Schierwaldenrath" and "Harzelt"). If a way is not only for agricultural traffic, I totally agree to map it as unclassified or service (depending on the usage). I love the idea of having a clear distinction between highway=unclassified/service/track, as shown in the link I provided in the first comment. 
Example: The way "Holzweg" north east of this changeset is similar to the road in your changeset. However, it is NOT restricted to agricultural traffic and thus, not mapped as "highway=track".

(By the way, I live there and all people commonly refer to the way between Harzelt and Schierwaldenrath as "Feldweg" [track] ;) ).
I will try to make an update to smoothness, etc. (also for some surrounding ways) this evening.
Martin Borsje (2020-07-09 09:15:26+00:00): Here, in the Netherlands, a track (broad unsurfaced way) is generally accessible for all motor vehicles; isn't this the same in Germany?
Closing the road to 'normal' vehicles in routers is not done by tagging it as track but by adding the proper tags as motor_vehicle=agricultural (and most likely moped=mofa=yes); this blocks the way for normal cars. Also if the way is tagged as unclassified.
The practical issue for me, when cycling there  is that tracks how up on my Garmin as thin brown lines (so no cycling on a racing bike is then the conclusion) while in fact these are nice asphalt roads.
Michael712 (2020-07-10 10:22:15+00:00): In general, tracks can also be used by all motor vehicles. However, that differs from state to state (in NRW a track is neither nor public, i.e. the question is not easy to answer). In most cases a sign that prohibits motor_vehicles is used.
Adding the appropiate tags (motor_vehicle=agricultural, etc.) is highly encouraged.
I understand your issue, however, I suggest to stick to common mapping patterns (primary use for agricultural traffic --> track).
Michael712 (2020-07-10 10:23:11+00:00): The word "private" is missing in the first sentence in brackets: "in NRW a track is neither private nor public"
scai (2020-05-16 18:42:53+00:00): Hi,

ist der kostenpflichtige Internetzugang ein Versehen? Kenne das im REWE stattdessen als kostenfreies WLAN.

Grüße
Alex
Hedaja (2020-05-17 13:11:44+00:00): Danke Alex
da habe ich mich wohl verklickt. Ist nun korrigiert

Grüße 
Christian
scai (2020-05-17 13:37:37+00:00): Super :)
elgolfo (2020-05-18 10:58:57+00:00): Hallo Mecklenburger, der Weg ist so noch ungünstig beschrieben.
bicycle=yes, foot=yes kann weg da highway=path immer für Radfahrende und Fußgänger freigegeben ist. horse=yes nur wenn explizit für Reiter freigegeben. 
Mit access=no markierst du den Weg als komplett gesperrt. Das sollte also auch weg. Kraftfahrzeuge sind auf highway=path verboten,  motor_vehicle=no kann also auch weg.
Verläuft der Weg auf einem Damm? Falls nicht,d ann embankment=yes weg.
surface lässt sich mit ground etc. noch besser spezifizieren. Du könntest noch smoothness=* für die Wegbeschaffenheit hinzufügen.
Viele Grüße
Moritz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85310980
FreedSky (2020-05-17 13:26:29+00:00): For areas actually controlled by China, you can add the name of Vietnam to name: vi
Direct replacement is equal to destruction.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-05-17 13:46:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85335432 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the South China Sea. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3699
FreedSky (2020-05-17 13:25:41+00:00): For areas actually controlled by China, you can add the name of Vietnam to name: vi
Direct replacement is equal to destruction.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-05-17 13:46:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85335432 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the South China Sea. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3699
FreedSky (2020-05-17 13:25:21+00:00): For areas actually controlled by China, you can add the name of Vietnam to name: vi
Direct replacement is equal to destruction.
FreedSky (2020-05-17 13:24:55+00:00): For areas actually controlled by China, you can add the name of Vietnam to name: vi
Direct replacement is equal to destruction.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-05-17 13:46:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85335432 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the South China Sea. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3699
FreedSky (2020-05-17 13:20:03+00:00): For areas actually controlled by China, you can add the name of Vietnam to name: vi
Direct replacement is equal to destruction.
SafwatHalaby (2020-05-16 17:24:10+00:00): Total names copies: 6398
Total mismatches: 782
Total fixmes added: 316
Eng bugfixes: 0
Total name to name:en: 1146
Total name to name:he: 4994
Total name to name:ar: 258
Whitespace fixes: 32
Total scanned: 8072
Total unhandled errors: 1001
SafwatHalaby (2020-05-16 17:24:39+00:00): Errors requiring human attention: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:SafwatHalaby/scripts/nameCopy/errors
SafwatHalaby (2020-05-16 17:30:40+00:00): It appears this automated edit has hit a peculiar worldwide relation which had one member in Israel: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7166420/
Commodoortje (2020-12-22 08:50:07+00:00): hoi goedegazelle, je gaf een aanbeveling op onderstaande changeset. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96206173
Maar je hebt zelf de tag naar building=civic gewijzigd op 16.05.20
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jhv3mx1jbdq5vvq/2020-12-22_09-47-04.jpg?raw=1
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3533118
DD1GJ (2020-05-17 06:44:30+00:00): Hydrant entfernt, Wir erfassen bei OSM die Realität und keine falschen Pläne. Beim Leitungsdurchmesser bitte nur die Zahl ohne "DN" eintragen.
tanish1980 (2020-05-18 06:39:56+00:00): hi shirley,
Line feature is used to draw road,rail, streams, canals, power lines etc.  u have used line tool to draw a farmland plz use area feature for this purpose. thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85312157
muzirian (2020-11-09 20:39:11+00:00): hi please, don't add personal info to public maps
muzirian (2020-11-09 20:40:22+00:00): Sorry, the name was carried over from previous edit, moving comment
marc__marc (2021-03-10 13:02:58+00:00): Hello,
What's that ? really an embassy ? witch country ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dembassy
Regards,
Marc
eggie (2020-05-16 18:28:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review: Zeker het gedeelte over het erf hoort inderdaad niet op de kaart.
Het gedeelte door het bouwland zou wel als highway=track tracktype=grade5 
kunnen blijven liggen.
Overigens stond alles als access=private getagd. Het routeerde al niet in OSM. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-16 18:42:14+00:00): De historie.. 
Dit is ooit een donatie import geweest van Kaartenmaker AND in 2007. 
In die import zijn alle toegangswegen en dit soort landbouwsporen als voetgangersgebied (pedestrian)  in OSM terecht gekomen. 
Ooit heb ik het zelf op private gezet. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=21446464
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2020-05-17 04:50:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
bryceco (2020-05-24 05:16:03+00:00): Is way 804714457 something you added just to help align the nodes? Do you mind if I delete it? This is just a few blocks from my house so I like to keep the area tidy :)
Anton Lavrov (2020-05-26 05:04:00+00:00): Hi bryceco,
Yes, I added it just to align the nodes inside the building. Sure feel free to delete it - I'll be more careful in future not to submit such auxiliary lines.
nicolaymitropolsky (2020-05-24 13:37:04+00:00): Hello! As I understand you're marking as `highway=cycleway` some forest trails. I've just to inform you that It is not really correct. The  `highway=cycleway` should be used only for "official" bicycle roads https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway and using it for forest trails could seriously mislead people who is planning a bicycle trip.

`highway=path` should be used instead with some `mtb:scale` addition

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

Wish you safe trips!
frbg (2023-05-27 20:59:58+00:00): Ist es zweckmäßig von Arnsdorf in Richtung Stausee jeden einzelnen Baum in die Karte zu zeichnen oder dient es nur der Statistik?
Hedaja (2023-05-28 06:31:55+00:00): Hallo 
Kann man so machen muss man aber nicht. Ganz du ganz frei entscheiden =)

Schönes Wochenende
nikospag (2020-05-19 01:33:36+00:00): Are you totally idiot? Who gave you the right to remove int_name keys from the map? Please DWG do something about it, he keeps making a mess here.
nikospag (2020-05-19 02:03:23+00:00): int_name removal proof here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/784579484/history
Pikse (2023-04-08 10:06:36+00:00): It probably isn't a good idea to reuse a village border as a railway (way/45499064), even if it's only a proposed railway. I now updated this village border and hence the railway also shifted.