piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dcapillae (2022-02-13 12:38:06+00:00): Hola, Alan. Un placer leerte. Coincido contigo. Yo ni siquiera sabía que este mirador tenía un nombre hasta que lo vi en el poste indicador que hay más abajo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9084293987.

El error en el nombre («Conocerte» en lugar de «Conocerme») debe ser cosa mía. Hace algún tiempo pasé por el lugar, me llamó la atención el poste, tome una foto y puse el nombre en el mapa. Seguramente me equivoqué al leerlo en la foto y lo transcribí mal en el mapa. Siéntete libre de corregirlo.

En cuanto a si se debería o no mantener el nombre del mirador, comparto tu criterio de que, si no fuera por ese poste situado más abajo, este mirador no debería tener nombre alguno. Sin embargo, al estar ese poste, creo que lo más correcto sería mantenerlo para seguir la regla de mapear lo que hay sobre el terreno, aunque ciertamente es un nombre muy poco utilizado por la gente que visita el lugar.

Gracias por el enlace, no conocía la historia. Por favor, siéntete libre de corregir lo que sea necesario. Confío en tu criterio.

Atentamente,

Daniel
yrtimiD (2021-09-14 10:07:26+00:00): hello and welcome!
small correction: name tag should always have text in area local language. Other languages should be added as name:en, name:he,.. tags.
I fixed tags on Bet Gavriel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914243780
Also, it's better to not spread edits over long distances, you can commit changes any time you want, don't forget to write meaningful explanation of the change to help other mappers to understand your change.
user_11418917 (2021-09-12 22:00:59+00:00): Stop adding duplicated nodes!
hatul (2021-09-14 15:08:49+00:00): שלום, בעריכה הזו חתכת את שביל ישראל שחצה את הכביש. היו בו שינויים? תוכל לתקן אותו? תודה
Flayer (2021-09-14 16:35:36+00:00): היי, תיקנתי.
את הכביש כבר אי אפשר לחצות בהיעדר רמזור.
hatul (2021-09-14 17:13:08+00:00): מצוין, תודה. עוברים מתחת לכביש?
Flayer (2021-09-14 17:16:45+00:00): כן, המעבר מתחת לכביש כבר היה קיים כחלק ממסלול מקומי.
hatul (2021-09-14 17:34:12+00:00): מצוין
wkdgs (2021-09-13 10:38:17+00:00): Hi,

kannst du noch das letzte Übrprüfungsdatum hinzufügen? Das ist bei Baustellen wichtig damit man vergessene Baustellen dientifizieren kann.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:check_date

LG
winkeldings
Rangarid (2021-09-13 10:56:52+00:00): Hi,

Ich hab die Baustelle entfernt und die h Autobahnauffahrt ersetzt. Commit msg war etwas uneindeutig, muss ich gestehen. Braucht es dafür auch das Datum?

Gruß
Rangarid (2021-09-13 10:59:50+00:00): Ah ich seh grad, da sind noch construction Felder. Ich entferne die gerade noch...
Jmapper007 (2021-09-12 18:45:35+00:00): Yikes, that was a litttle bigger than it should have been.
eggie (2021-09-12 20:00:47+00:00): Na jaren weer een edit, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2021-09-13 08:49:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111108752
SafetyIng (2021-09-13 10:42:12+00:00): Sind das alles ein Hotel oder gehören die zusammen?  Weil jetzt sind ja effektiv vier Hotels eingetragen....
V-Raptor (2021-09-13 17:58:09+00:00): Das ist ein Hotel bei dem die Zimmer auf mehrere Gebäude verteilt sind.
muralito (2021-09-13 01:37:52+00:00): Hola. Sin entrar en discusion sobre si este cambio particularmente esta bien o mal, el nombre no siempre tiene que ver con el tamaño, sino con el nombre propiamente que tiene ese elemento, ya sea oficial o por los vecinos. Muchas veces los nombres están erróneos, pero bueno, son los nombres que tienen.
eggie (2021-09-12 19:42:52+00:00): Dag eppie.. Wanneer er hier asphalt ligt dan is  de tracktype=grade1 en niet grade4  . Kijk je nog even?
Verder kun je eigenlijk met editor iD geen wegen splitsen waar routerelaties over lopen. 
Hier loopt LAW Rivierpark Maasvallei LAW. Die is nu niet meer oke.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-12 19:54:22+00:00): De routedelen lagen al niet goed. Het komt niet door jouw bijdrage. 
Ik heb tracktype grade1 toegevoegd,
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-13 08:00:20+00:00): *( PB contact
eggie (2021-09-17 11:16:31+00:00): Eerst maar eens die paden uploaden.. dan kijken we zo wel naar die ontbrekende delen.
eggie (2021-09-17 11:19:27+00:00): Hier iets gevonden
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/josm/josm-relations/
eggie (2021-09-17 11:21:38+00:00): ..en dan dat stukje lezen relaties voor routes.
Het moet vast lukken.
Frans S (2021-09-13 08:57:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111109563
Frans S (2021-09-13 08:47:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please be more accurate. Your mappings are a bit oversizedin some cases.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111109822
Frans S (2021-09-13 08:44:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111109948
Duja (2021-09-23 14:05:11+00:00): Slučajno nabasah na ovu "raspravu". Mojih 2c: iako to jesu "gradska naselja" po popisu, zapravo su prigradska naselja Podgorice i Bijelog Polja, i većina ljudi ih ne smatra zasebnim gradovima (niti imaju npr. poštu, pijacu i sl.). Mislim da je suburb korektniji tag (osim možda Golubovaca, koji su i gradska opština).
Frans S (2021-09-13 08:43:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Be more accurate by following the outlines of the building
Square the buildings.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111110469
archie (2021-09-12 20:07:54+00:00): Radera inte saker. Kölnestugan finns som ortnamn, som vi i Sverige ritar på en nod samt som namn på övernattningsstugan. Varför fogar du in toaletten i vägbanan?
archie (2021-09-12 20:49:38+00:00): Kölnestugan som du raderade som dublett fanns tillsammans med dels taggen isolated_dwelling samt dels som wilderness_hut. Varför uppfattade du detta som en dublett? Varför fogar du in/flyttar en toalett som en nod in i vägen/stigen?
CharliePlett (2021-09-12 22:11:09+00:00): Nice changeset number.
tyr_asd (2021-09-13 08:55:31+00:00): :)
vmicho (2021-09-15 14:05:45+00:00): Congratulations! All eleven  :D
rafalwlo (2021-09-15 14:09:12+00:00): Oh conglaturation !!!! A winner is you :)
Magick93 (2021-11-11 19:01:27+00:00): GET! Lucky changeset
Nonichase (2022-07-24 05:38:40+00:00): :)
JhowieNitnek (2022-04-14 07:50:55+00:00): Why did you made it a point and not the whole building?
Thierry1030 (2022-04-15 11:32:52+00:00): reply in the chat van OSM-BE:
"thibaultmol
It's tricky. My personal understanding is: if the ENTIRE building is indeed that amenity, then yes. But if a section of it is a house/living space, or one of the floors of the building isn't that amenity. then you should just use a node
You can never go wrong with using a node
but if truly the entire building is that amenity, it'd tag the entire building
A67-A67 (2021-09-13 08:29:48+00:00): Dit is een ovale rotonde, geen cirkelvormige. Ik heb de vorm hersteld en uitgelijnd m.b.v. de Superview-luchtfoto van augustus.
Maarten Deen (2021-09-13 12:57:43+00:00): Huh? Ik ben er gisteren overheen gereden en ik vond hem toch heel rond.
A67-A67 (2021-09-13 13:42:40+00:00): De rotonde was een stuk ronder dan ik hem oorspronkelijk had getekend, maar het is geen cirkel. De noordelijke en zuidelijke aansluiting zijn ten opzichte van elkaar verschoven. Ik kan me wel voorstellen dat het er rond uit ziet als je rechtdoor gaat. Bij linksaf slaan (wat nog niet kan) zul je het wel merken.
wkdgs (2021-09-13 11:55:15+00:00): Hi,

der Tag "name" ist nur für Eigennamen gedacht. "Trafo" hört sich eher nach einer Beschreibung an für die der Tag "description" gedacht ist.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name

LG
winkeldings
highflyer74 (2021-09-13 13:55:15+00:00): Moin zusammen!

Auch wichtig wäre in diesem Fall, überhaupt ein "Haupt"-Tag zu setzen. Das hieße power=substation. Erst dann wird das Trafohäuschen auch als ein solches erkannt. substation=minor_distribution ist dann die Verfeinerung.

Die Adressdaten und den Namen würde ich komplett entfernen. Auch ein description=* in diesem Fall nicht nötig, da obiges bereits alles sagt :-)

Schönen Tag euch!
user_13975366 (2021-09-13 23:22:01+00:00): Habe mal die Eigenschaften so angepasst.
Mir war nicht klar, dass auch die Reihenfolge der Eigenschaften wichtig ist.
Danke für die Infos.
highflyer74 (2021-09-14 04:44:28+00:00): Guten Morgen und danke für die Rückmeldung! Die Reihenfolge ist eigentlich egal. Es gibt Haupt-Tags, welche beschreiben, was ein Objekt überhaupt ist, und bei manchen Dingen dann noch Tags, welche das noch verfeinern, so wie in diesem Fall. Ich schicke Dir mal ein paar Links per PN, die Dir evtl. weiterhelfen.
user_5359 (2022-03-27 05:38:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982319252/history. I can't see any building with a height of 104 meter. Please check the value!
jptolosa (2021-09-22 18:45:17+00:00): Hello, this section doesn't seem a "footway". It's a secondary highway.
felipeeugenio (2021-09-22 21:33:59+00:00): Karina. Por favor una vez más, Ingresar al chat es primordial.
Michael712 (2021-09-13 07:59:13+00:00): Kein import!
Das sollte nicht von diesem User-Account sondern von Michael712 hochgeladen werden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111112048
Falsernet (2021-09-22 22:52:50+00:00): Just wanna say thank you for mapping things so accurately. Much better than any imported data I've seen. :)
user_1566574 (2021-09-30 12:57:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour le parc d'accrobranche, privilégiez plutôt :
landuse=recreation_ground
leisure=sports_centre
sport=climbing_adventure
(source : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:sport)

Merci beaucoup pour ces ajouts !
Hans Thompson (2021-09-13 17:04:36+00:00): nice edit!
MapSpot (2021-09-17 03:06:45+00:00): Great work micromapping Mexico's rivers. Just wanted to note a slight issue with the tagging. The JOSM editor currently tags river areas as waterway=riverbank by default, but this tagging scheme is in the process of being phased out globally, especially after the iD editor began marking traditional "riverbank" water areas as outdated tags.
For better consistency with a majority of Mexico's (and the world's) river areas, it is strongly advised to use the modern tagging scheme of natural=water + water=river.
Feel free to message me if you have any questions of concerns, and check out the River Modernization project page for more info about the status and outreach we perform.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization
dmgroom_ct (2021-09-17 10:25:03+00:00): I do try and remember to update the existing tags on the ways & relations to the new tagging,  But I dont always remember to do so.
E de Wit (2021-09-12 21:02:34+00:00): Te snel op uploaden gedrukt..
Correcte titel:
Wergea | Detaillering parkeerplaats en terrein Gasterij de Wâldwei
marc__marc (2026-02-22 12:49:26+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9084812844/history/1#map=19/47.897915/-121.402592
can you review the exact location of the reception desk ? currently it isn't inside a building
Regards,
Marc
jake-low (2026-02-22 23:33:00+00:00): The feature you're asking about is the location of the camp host (the caretaker of the campground), which is where you check in if you have a reservation. It's not inside a building, it's just a tourism=camp_pitch where the host stays.

I tagged it as camp_site=reception as recommended at the time by the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site page. It seems that since then the tagging recommendations have changed; I don't know the correct way to tag it now.
flohoff (2021-09-14 09:31:07+00:00): Moin,
hast du mit dem original Author mal kommuniziert, nicht das der einfach weiter macht. 

Hatte gerade kurz in den original changeset geguckt und da steht nichts.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111113355
DD1GJ (2021-09-14 19:17:09+00:00): Moin Flo,

ich war mit dem Mapper per PN im Dialog. Er hatte die Punkte ungeprüft übernommen. GT-10007 war z.B.  in OSM bereits an der richtigen Stelle vorhanden und wurde aufgrund falscher amtlicher Daten in 100 Metern Entfernung nochmals neu importiert.

Grüße, Joachim
Frans S (2021-09-13 08:27:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111113696
JhowieNitnek (2021-09-14 15:43:23+00:00): The solar panels now cover the whole roof...
bxl-forever (2021-09-14 16:47:29+00:00): OK, thanks for this.
We should keep it as a separate object from the building but I made it larger, then.  And we could improve it further once 2021 aerial imagery is available.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-09-17 05:26:15+00:00): hello, can you explain why you made this edit, when the official tourism website says the opposite http://www.visitmadeira.pt/en-gb/what-to-do/activities/search/pr-15-vereda-da-ribeira-da-janela

Public entity that's responsible for maintenance of the path https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/images/FotosArtigos/ActivNatureza/PercPedRecom/Paineis_Net/pr15.jpg

legislation that clearly shows the name https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/images/Doc_Artigos/Percursos_Pedestres/DespachoN53de2018.pdf

changeset has been reverted as your edit makes no sense
Mindolluin (2021-09-17 06:06:02+00:00): If you actually look at the map on the tourism website you (and I) linked to, you can see that this is not PR15. There is a Levada da Ribeira da Janela and there is a Vereda da Ribeira da Janela. They are not identical. The Levada (to the west) was named Vereda and the Vereda (to the east) was named Levada. The PR15 denomination existed twice. You just reverted a correct edit without bothering to look at the evidence given.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-09-17 06:09:00+00:00): Correct. Was reverted
Mindolluin (2021-09-17 06:09:09+00:00): Additionally, the Levada is not easily accessible. Designating it as PR15 could actually lead to people going there with wwrong expectations leader to actual danger.
Mindolluin (2021-09-17 06:12:01+00:00): Thanks.
Yunkers (2021-09-19 13:06:35+00:00): Hej, dlaczego powiększyłeś kategorię tych dróg? Przy takich zmianach wypada zrobić większy komentarz niż 'kropka', bo narażasz się na wycofanie zmiany.
rdzik (2021-09-22 18:57:02+00:00): Hej, według tego dokumentu ze strony miasta: https://przemysl.pl/download/attachment/13005/tab-66-i-67.pdf
są to drogi powiatowe główne, więc są klasę wyżej niż drogi powiatowe zbiorcze (trzeciorzędowe), dlatego uznałem że warto je podnieść do kategorii dróg drugorzędowych, jeśli się mylę to oczywiście można wycofać zmianę.
Yunkers (2021-09-25 09:04:36+00:00): Dzięki za informację, wygląda w porządku w takich razie. Pamiętaj jednak o lepszym opisaniu zmian, źródło też warto wrzucić, wtedy nie będzie trzeba niczego tłumaczyć :)
JJIglesias (2021-09-13 05:05:15+00:00): Saludos.Podrias Aclarar q es ese NODO EDWIN que creastes como "Community Center" , Cual es exactamente el Proposito de ese Nodo Edwin, pues si se trata de informacion personal, sera removida del mapa. Gracias
Frans S (2021-09-13 08:26:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please map also the annexes and be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111114696
ovruni (2021-09-12 23:24:13+00:00): En este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado las etiquetas de subestación, las cuales pueden corroborarse desde la web de osinergmin https://www.osinergmin.gob.pe/newweb/uploads/Publico/MapaSEIN/
ovruni (2021-09-12 23:24:06+00:00): En este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado las etiquetas de subestación, las cuales pueden corroborarse desde la web de osinergmin https://www.osinergmin.gob.pe/newweb/uploads/Publico/MapaSEIN/
CoyKoi (2021-09-13 04:27:25+00:00): Hi Isaac, welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for your contributions. In this changeset, you changed a bus stop into a fire hydrant. This was probably unintended. Please note the editor gives you a chance to review your edits, before publishing, in order to pick up accidents like this
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111114853
cyton (2021-09-13 00:47:38+00:00): das landschaftsschutzgebiet ist doch schon eingetragen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696839892 oder meinst du die grenze verläuft da anders?
ich hab mich da an den vorgaben aus dem datensatz "Geoportal Berlin / Schutzgebiete nach Naturschutzrecht (inklusive Natura 2000)" gehalten und das entsprechend angepasst wo das nicht so richtig passte.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111114858
a_d_s (2021-09-13 13:35:14+00:00): Ich weiß nicht wie sich die "Access"Verhältnisse dort mit dem Landschaftsschutzgebiet sowie den Anwohnern an der Straße auswirken. Hätte ich vielleicht im FixMe besser schreiben können.
Frans S (2021-09-13 14:01:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111114889
TuAmigoElEditor (2021-09-12 23:33:29+00:00): Hola, esas subestaciones supongo que son parte de la Central Hidroelectrica.
¿Estaría bien si pongo un área con la clasificación de Hydroelectric power station que cubra las subestaciones?
ovruni (2021-09-12 23:35:43+00:00): Justo eso iba a decir, que las centrales cubren la subestación, generadores y otros elementos adicionales.
Saludos
TuAmigoElEditor (2021-09-12 23:39:19+00:00): Ok Entonces los cubriré con un área nuevo. Saludos
ovruni (2021-09-12 23:39:46+00:00): Puede que haya una especie de turbina que se activa por donde pasa el curso de agua y algunos objetos dentro de las edificaciones, los cuales luego de generar la energía la manda a las subestaciones y estas luego mediante cables y postes son transportadas.
Saludos
CoyKoi (2021-09-13 04:31:59+00:00): Hi Isaac welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions, I've had a look at the changesets and you've done a good job adding a new building outline, and a fenceline. in regards to this changeset - the area was already covered by landuse=residential, so adding this area is not required. And please note that a description like 'private property' is not suitable for the name tag. And in this situation (private residential suburb), this degree of detail is already implied. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111114987
eggie (2022-04-11 14:22:24+00:00): Dag pavinder.. Hier heb ik de landuse weer hersteld. De polygoon was niet gesloten.
In het duingebied heb ik de onbegroeide stukken zand als inner pgenomen in de mp van ruig land.
MVG
eggie
ElliottPlack (2021-09-14 21:31:02+00:00): Thank you for adding these! MDOT SHA is actively using OSM crosswalk data for analysis. We're also working on updating protected bicycle infrastructure like what you've added here, so this is perfect. I've been working on getting this into an OSM challenge for updates here: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/21234
szydzio (2021-09-20 10:00:45+00:00): Numery dróg powiatowych / gminnych przesunięte do unsigned_ref. Przy okazji changesetów opisanych jako "dodanie numeru drogi" proszę nie zmieniać dotychczasowych kategorii dróg.
szydzio (2021-09-20 10:01:44+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=841598#p841598
zuicz (2021-09-14 19:48:06+00:00): Numery dróg powiatowych dodajemy do tagu unsigned_ref=, bo inaczej wygląda to bardzo słabo na mapie :)
szydzio (2021-09-20 09:57:44+00:00): Numery dróg powiatowych przesunięte do unsigned_ref.
Greg_Rose (2021-09-26 23:30:26+00:00): That's definitely not the Reed Lakes Trail, fyi
Hans Thompson (2021-09-26 23:38:43+00:00): This is what the girlfriend told me from her camping adventure. I'm not against removing it.