piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LSkalayo (2020-10-21 18:17:44+00:00): Thank you for reaching out. This road was originally added as a tertiary. The northern portion of the road is being used to funnel traffic, so I agreed it could be tertiary. The road then becomes less used and does not seem to be carrying as much traffic, so I changed that section to unclassified. Classifications are based on utility of the road, so it is alright for the road surface to be dirt and for the road to still be carrying traffic. I hope this helps clarify the classifications for you.

Gracias por comunicarte. Este camino se añadió originalmente como terciario. La parte norte de la carretera se está utilizando para canalizar el tráfico, así que estuve de acuerdo en que podría ser terciario. Entonces, el camino se vuelve menos utilizado y no parece tener tanto tráfico, así que cambié esa sección a sin clasificar. Las clasificaciones se basan en la utilidad de la carretera, por lo que está bien que la superficie de la carretera sea de tierra y que todavía tenga tráfico. Espero que esto le ayude a aclarar las clasificaciones.
mdelatorre (2020-10-24 21:45:59+00:00): Thanks for your answer. The classification of the roads is based on the relative importance that each country has depending on OSM and not on its utility. I don't know how you know how much traffic a road has if you only use an image as a source. highway = unclassified is used for minor public roads, usually at the lowest level of the interconnection network, and they are not residential streets or farm roads. highway = unclassified should be used for roads used by local traffic and to connect other cities, towns, or villages. In this case, it is a road that is more agricultural and is not part of the main interconnection network of the town, so in my opinion it should be classified as highway = track.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92606679
LSkalayo (2020-10-26 17:50:56+00:00): I left that portion of the road as unclassified since it seems to be pulling traffic from the village above it and providing access for users to then go over to Jilotzingo. With that portion of the road as track, users will be routed up and around the small village in order to go to Jilotzingo.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-11-22 12:29:52+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2281654 ?

Wygląda na to że budowy tu jeszcze nie ma (tak mają pozwolenie na budowę - co nie oznacza że budowa się zaczęłą na całej długości)
Zandu (2020-10-17 21:22:20+00:00): Good day, I noticed your edits in a local city I map.  Thanks for the details you add.  I request you add changeset comments in accordance with good mapping standards of the OSM community.  I see others have requested this 12 times.  Please let us know what you are adding.
74523978 (2020-10-18 12:18:01+00:00): Net zo slordig en onnodig als altijd. Grote jongen. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92607869
Carnildo (2020-10-19 08:05:11+00:00): When you're moving business information to building outlines like you did here, could you please make sure you don't delete address information in the process?
eggie (2023-01-20 12:08:52+00:00): Hoi Jeroen,

Deze mapper vraagt om feedback wegens z'n afslag
Ik heb ergens het idee dat hier iets niet klopt.
Zie nu ook een 
lift_gate  zonder access=yes?


Kun jij eens kijken.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131504309

Groet
eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2023-01-22 23:54:36+00:00): Wijziging klopt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1030275263/history). De lift_gate zonder expliciete access hoort bij de wisselbaan.
eggie (2023-01-23 06:08:17+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor het meekijken..
Groet
eggie
seattlefyi (2020-10-17 00:39:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the business website! Those are really useful!
user_5359 (2020-10-17 15:32:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Z7n. I assume you forgot the delete the key ADD_NUM.
LogicalViolinist (2020-10-17 16:47:08+00:00): woops, I usually delete that key/transform it into addr:housenumber. Sorry about that, fixed now
frosm (2020-10-17 21:11:37+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
Merci pour vos ajouts.
Mais n'hésites pas à transformer une partie de la description en attribut permetant aux applications de mieux vous trouver, particulièrement 
bio -> attribut organic
UNIQUEMENT SUR COMMANDE .> reservation
par ailleurs je ne comprend pas ce que vous voulez dire pas "pas de vente sur place", ce n'est donc pas un magasin mais uniquement un fournil ?
Bonne continuation
aceman444 (2020-11-29 23:20:47+00:00): Zdravim, ake opravy? Co tu hlavne vidim, ze sne znicili znacku farby 'colour' na nezmyselnu hodnotu '#{0.value}' vo vsetkych 195 relaciach, ktorych ste sa tu dotkli (nechapem preco). Co najskor to vrattne na povodne hodnoty a taktiez v inych znackach, ktore ste znicili, ako roof:colour. Dufam, ze ste ine podobne sady zmien po svete neporobili.
A tiez piste zmysluplne komentare sad zmien (pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn). "opravy a upravy" je prilis vseobecne a pisete to na mnohych sadach zmien. Dakujem
Langlaeufer (2022-09-28 15:16:28+00:00): Hi Galbinus,
forestry=yes ?
Meintest du motor_vehicle=yes?
Betrifft den ganzen Schwalenberger Wald.
anothercypres (2021-03-06 13:13:07+00:00): Bonjour florian_g, avec ce changeset vous avez bloqué la M2565 avec un cône. 5 mois plus tard, est-ce que cette modification temporaire est toujours d’actualité ?
Hopla57 (2021-03-06 15:21:21+00:00): Bonjour anothercypre,
Je ne suis pas de la région (plutôt Grand Est), j'ai voulu aider à la mise à jour cartographique du coin suite à la catastrophe déclenchée par la tempête Alex il y a quelques mois. Pour la modification dont vous parlez, je me suis donc servi des vues aériennes réalisées en urgence par l'IGN et rendues disponibles via les outils OSM. La tuile montrant le blocage est ici :
https://proxy-ign.openstreetmap.fr/alex/20/545588/381214.jpg
Du coup, je ne sais pas si c'est encore d'actualité. J'imagine que non, depuis le temps. Peut-être avez-vous des infos ?
Cordialement.
anothercypres (2021-03-07 11:16:21+00:00): Non, je n’ai pas d’infos, mais en regardant sur https://www.inforoutes06.fr/ je pense qu’on peut dire que la M 2565 est ouverte dans toute la vallée de la Vésubie. Si je trouve le temps cette semaine, j’enlèverai toutes les restrictions temporaires dans OSM.
DP24PH (2020-10-17 09:21:58+00:00): NOTICE TO MAPPERS: This changeset will reflect on both #OSMPH #papercut_fix 64 and 75. You may visit https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue for more information.
Be safe, be well, stay sane, and you are loved.

DP24
DP24PH (2020-10-26 07:27:07+00:00): Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, any third-party sources (i.e. Google Street View) is strictly forbidden on OpenStreetMap, and only Mapillary, Maxar are authorised sources for the OSM. 
Kindly revert into previous version to avoid such copyright-related infringement cases, cease and desist all access=private tagging into highway=* to avoid further navigation issues. Use access=private only on barrier=gate/lift_gate.
user_5359 (2020-10-20 15:33:49+00:00): Hello! Please chekc the tag Church=GPIB Immanuel . Did you mean amenity=place_of_workship & name=GPIB Immanuel. Please add also the key reloigion and denomination.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-10-25 13:33:29+00:00): Neste changeset voce tambem fez coisas indevidas, voce deixou essa https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8015873133 via reta, retirando os nos que fazem esta curva que mandei, um usuario ja corrigiu. eu pedi para que revertam todas suas edições feitas nos ultimos 13 dias, pq parece que anteriormente voce editava sem deletar as coisas, espero que volte a mapear mas prestando mais atençao.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-02-06 16:18:29+00:00): Não consigo acreditar que até hoje os dados deste usuário que detonou o mapa não foram revertidos.
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-17 13:03:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92627900) for spam.

Regards,
ortho_is_hot
Mir76 (2020-10-18 18:13:36+00:00): В каком обществе?
izurala (2020-10-18 18:20:53+00:00): Было много философских бесед на этой скале. Лет 10 назад прозвали эти камни философскими.
В узком обществе с давней историей.
JesseFTW (2021-12-29 04:38:49+00:00): Why did you add some entries where the value is just the key, enclosed in square brackets?
Reeniz (2020-10-17 08:39:13+00:00): No agregues datos falsos, porfavor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92612317
felipeeugenio (2020-11-25 12:52:23+00:00): 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Hevał (2020-10-17 20:03:57+00:00): براکەی خۆم هاتەوە یاڕەبی بەخێربێیتەوە ئێێێێ مەساجەکە چۆن بوو؟
kalhur bnar (2020-10-24 17:44:21+00:00): مەساجی چی پەنا بەخوا
Hevał (2020-10-26 14:16:53+00:00): نا نا شەرمی ناوێ سەیر ئینبۆکس بکە
kalhur bnar (2020-10-27 18:03:55+00:00): ئینبۆکسی چی؟ تێناگەم
Hevał (2020-10-28 15:41:44+00:00): مەبەستم نامەیە ئەی لە کوێوە سەیر نامە ئەکەیت؟
user_5359 (2020-10-17 06:50:58+00:00): Hello! Please use the key source instead of SOURCE
adiatmad (2020-10-17 07:22:21+00:00): Hello user_5359 !

I don't know about this project but I'm interested in your feedback. Do you mind providing the object ID? For example.
user_5359 (2020-10-18 04:52:35+00:00): Hello adiatmad! See https://www.osm.org/way/859953058/history
adiatmad (2020-10-18 14:58:23+00:00): Oh, I got it. Key tag in capslock mode. But you fixed it. Thank you!
nevw (2020-10-17 11:33:25+00:00): Jeez! You’ve made Pitt St hard to drive along with the newly introduced sharp bends
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-17 13:35:00+00:00): G'day, and welcome to OSM,

I've gone ahead and reverted this change (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92628832) since it looks like you've accidentally moved the node that was connected to the road.

If you have any questions about OSM then please browse the wiki or feel free to drop questions below.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
aharvey (2020-10-18 05:50:31+00:00): If backyard swimming pools are visible from the imagery I believe it's okay to map them, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information does touch on this and comes to the view that they are around the limit of what's acceptable to map. I think they are useful for people building out property data, people doing research, councils to check any legally required fences are there so while you don't have to map them, it's okay to and once these have been mapped they generally shouldn't be removed unless they are no longer there.
Bushman86 (2020-10-18 07:59:46+00:00): yep, so in time maybe useful to have after-all. not a top priority i guess. i had added the pools not 5 minutes before and had some doubts. i'll leave it for now
aharvey (2020-10-18 05:46:42+00:00): hi I saw you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702577536/ as a tunnel, however at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.73204444444445&lng=151.00581944444446&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=FW1WjK0_GOz5K2Nwy09Zkg&x=0.19471178723412683&y=0.5153911999735892&zoom=1.5412844036697249 it looks like it's ground level, it doesn't go into a tunnel, it's just that a building was built on top. In this case I don't think it should be mapped as a tunnel.
jt15s (2020-10-18 06:49:20+00:00): Hi there, not sure what happened - I didn't mean to tag it as a tunnel! It's now been corrected - if you spot anything else that needs fixing, please let me know. Thanks!
Владимир К (2023-01-02 21:36:47+00:00): не нужно расставлять теги доступа на тропах. если там нет запрещающих знаков, то и тегов быть не должно. проходимость указывается по другому
Mamma li Turchi (2021-08-19 15:58:21+00:00): Please use more than just Esri World Imagery, it could be not the most recent at many places.
RiverBearings (2021-08-20 21:01:48+00:00): Hello Mama li Turchi. This editor is no longer on our team. However, thanks for the suggestion.
VitalieS (2020-10-19 05:34:50+00:00): Bună. 
Locația există deja pe OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92614824
nevw (2020-10-18 01:24:54+00:00): Hi
welcome to the OSM
Pleas note that we cannot use Google maps or street view as a source to edit the map as it is against their terms.
https://www.google.com/intl/en_au/help/terms_maps/
I will revert the changeset now.
If you are able to survey the street or otherwise verify using mapillary or other allowed source, please re-add the information.
ando2631 (2020-10-18 11:13:59+00:00): I have walked down Watkins Road several times, and I can see where these "streets" are, but there is an automated gate for vehicle entry, and residents in this community need to use a key to open a gate to walk in.
nevw (2020-10-18 14:34:44+00:00): Thanks ando2631
I’ll add the gate and tag it private again it the morning.
nevw (2020-10-19 05:48:12+00:00): Hi ando2631
I added the gate and marked access=private on ways and gate.
Thanks
ando2631 (2020-10-20 09:59:19+00:00): Thank you. I now see it in OSM with a little gate icon and grey dashed lines on these private roads.
Pol Dellaiera (2020-10-17 11:37:51+00:00): Ah bon?! :(
eggie (2020-10-17 07:38:49+00:00): Dag Richard.. foot=use_sidepath op de Hugo van Gijnweg is niet correct. Routeren doet het allemaal niet meer. Haal je die tag weer weg.
Het trottoir kun je opnemen met de tag sidewalk=right in de hoofdrijbaan.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-17 07:47:54+00:00): Ik heb het zelf even aangepast.. Geen foot=use_sidepath toevoegen als er geen side_path.
De routering gaat volledig zoek. Op de L der VS is het natuurlijk een andere zaak. 
cycleway=lane gaat dan niet functioneren als sidepath.
Het werkt echt niet in de routering.
Breng het anders aan de orde op het forum van OSM als je het er niet mee eens bent. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-17 07:50:29+00:00): De routering is nu volledig zoek voor voetgangers. 
Geen foot=no op fietspaden zetten als er geen trottoir.
Waarom hier mee doorgaan?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-17 07:51:24+00:00): Haal je foot=no weer weg van de fietspaden op de Overkampweg?
eggie (2020-10-17 07:51:55+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92616363
eggie (2020-10-17 13:53:33+00:00): foot no en use_sidepath verwijderd biij Overkampweg en Sterrenburgtunnel
Gr eggie
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-17 13:43:39+00:00): G'day,

I would suggest (imo) that modelling each turning direction at the intersection just ends up with superfluous geometry and makes it more difficult for renderers and routers. In my opinion the standard method of intersection modelling is sufficient? Interested to hear your thoughts.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-23 02:12:31+00:00): 2hu4u fixed this up a little in 92644654
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92616903
canfe (2020-10-19 07:21:53+00:00): Ho tolto dog park perché è una scuola di cani e non un parco per cani.
Se ci son dei dubbi son qui...
VitalieS (2020-10-19 05:34:25+00:00): Bună.
Ce reprezintă locația adăugată?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92617604
SomeoneElse (2020-10-17 22:02:51+00:00): Hello Ammaa and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please use meaningful changeset comments explaining what your are changing.  "47" or "78" doesn't help anyone to understand that.

Best Regards,

Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-10-17 22:03:12+00:00): سلام آمما و به OpenStreetMap خوش آمدید!

لطفاً از نظرات معنی دار در مورد تغییرات در توضیح آنچه تغییر می دهید استفاده کنید. "47" یا "78" به کسی کمک نمی کند تا آن را درک کند.

با احترام،

اندی
eggie (2020-10-17 14:13:25+00:00): Dag Cnar  Lijkt me oke.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-17 14:18:56+00:00): Oke... maar je moet wel in de gaten houden als je de hele node weghaalt en niet alleen de info dat dan de weg verspringt en je dus een stukje kromming kwijt bent.
Dus de volgende keer gewoon de node leegmaken  en op z'n plek laten. 
Hier viel het wel mee. Ik heb weer een node toegevoegd. 
MVG,
eggie
openMvD (2020-10-17 15:16:51+00:00): Dat 'extra' in de naam is nou net wél nodig. Op het terrein aan de andere kant van de Hoge Steeg wordt het 'Dialogue Centre' daadwerkelijk gebouwd. Dit is een EXTRA bouwterrein voor opslag - er wordt op dit terrein dus niets neergezet.
danieldegroot2 (2020-10-17 19:22:18+00:00): Dat is zo, alleen is een construction area zowieso niet alleen de building outline. Je kan het beste de building outline erop zetten als die beschikbaar is, dat zegt genoeg. Je kan een note toevoegen aan dit terrein dat het voor storage gebruikt wordt. Er is ook een voorgestelde landuse=storage tag. "extra" maakt voor mij persoonlijk de naam alleen maar langer (je zou i.p.v. "extra" er "opslag" van kunnen maken, dat is duidelijker).
jpennycook (2020-10-17 20:42:56+00:00): Hello.

I see you've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858219141 back to highway=cycleway.  There is a sign forbidding cycling on this section - see https://www.mapillary.com/app/index/jpennycook?lat=51.309868995200006&lng=-0.6997728123&z=17&tab=uploads&focus=photo&pKey=nFujlBUSvctL5OppzncoIW (the sign is on the wooden bollard on the right hand side of the image).  The other side of the bollard is here: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/KsXjrnnRWeKKf0K6OBxBd8 (showing that cycling is allowed west of the bollard).

Jon
Rigi03 (2020-10-17 21:41:49+00:00): Sorry about that, I’ve now changed it back.
Thanks
jpennycook (2020-10-18 16:08:30+00:00): Thanks!
Scout Jens (2022-01-04 14:20:37+00:00): Wege, die direkt an der Straße verlaufen, werden eigentlich nicht extra eingetragen
dvdhoven (2020-10-17 14:57:33+00:00): Ik heb het Marskramerpad weer heel gemaakt. Zaten een paar volgorde fouten in.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-30 11:47:18+00:00): Thanks for deleting https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859897146/history .  Do the other edits by this user (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Zxk ) look OK?
SK53 (2020-11-01 13:13:03+00:00): Not really enough local knowledge (I did wander down past the school/leisure centre complex back in Jan to Machins Lane. Kevjs1982 is more likely to be aware of current status.
eggie (2020-10-17 14:12:08+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution
Gr eggie
Hanysek96 (2021-04-05 06:25:14+00:00): Nyní je to Albert
Marián Kyral (2021-04-05 21:02:37+00:00): Kde přesně? V tomhle changesetu je toho hodně.
Hanysek96 (2021-04-06 14:08:43+00:00): -461021.32 | -1106228.65
Marián Kyral (2021-04-06 14:31:30+00:00): To je Křovák. Kdo to má převádět? :-D

Vpravo je poslední ikonka šipka s otazníkem - průzkum prvků. Tím klikneš do místa, kde je ten Albert. Zobrazí se ti seznam prvků v okolí, na správný prvek klikneš a pošleš odkaz.

Takhle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196680323
SomeoneElse (2021-06-22 10:19:18+00:00): I've since had a look around here, and it's not feasible to get through (in June, on foot).  Grass and scrub  is about 3 feet high.  Nothing is signed, no indication of anyone having used the path.
mdelatorre (2020-10-18 15:24:34+00:00): Thank you for adding information to OSM.
I reviewed your changeset and determined is GOOD.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92622723
ququruzka (2020-11-01 09:22:48+00:00): Добрий день.
підземний бункер часів 2СВ не варто було змінювати на рузкє інтерпетацію, тому що в поле name=*  можна вносити лише українську назву. наступного разу буде відкочено без попередження.
bachinsk (2020-11-01 12:49:13+00:00): Шановний, з Вами все нормально? Це власне я змінив назву з руської інтерпретації на українську, викинувши ВОВ. Зараз на карті саме моя назва. Ви вже 2 раз робите мені зауваження і другий раз некоректно. Треба краще аналізувати, хто які зміни робить. Бо це все виглядає щонайменше непрофесійно з Вашого боку.
ququruzka (2020-11-02 09:09:09+00:00): прошу звернути увагу, що хамська поведінка не прийнятна в спільноті ОСМ.

https://ibb.co/q780dPH
докази в студію.
bachinsk (2020-11-02 14:14:46+00:00): Це не хамська поведінка, а боротьба з несправедливістю. Спеціально міняю назви з російської на українську, а Ви мене звинувачуєте в прихильності до руського міра. Я не знаю, як в ОСМ відбувається фіксація змін, але тут щось не так. І Ви б могли з цим розібратися. На майбутнє буду надсилати Вам скріншоти того, що я змінив. Щоб не було безпідставних звинувачень на мою адресу.
Salmonleg (2020-11-02 20:16:47+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/4809698821

user bachinsk додав в 'name:uk', 'name' не мінялось
Salmonleg (2020-11-02 20:27:39+00:00): Проблеми з changeset/91317911 від ququruzka – в ньому половина точок оновлені, але ім'я без змін.

Наприклад:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6525448807
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4117025182
...
MaddMapper (2020-12-17 20:58:30+00:00): Привет TsymbalAV. Я заметил, что вы недавно реклассифицировали членов отношения ref = 70К-024 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2846591) как третичных. В таком случае мне интересно узнать, согласны ли вы, что некоторые из соединяющих магистралей, такие как https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35806766, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39352825, https: //www.openstreetmap.org/way/777916421 и https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2846543 также следует понизить. Их нынешняя классификация не соответствует правилам Russian Highway Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway).
dgitto (2022-02-19 20:46:11+00:00): Ciao, non rimettere i nomi delle strade in numeri romani please
Tresho (2022-02-19 20:53:59+00:00): Ciao, probabilmente l'ho modificata per farla concordare con i civici, mi è sfuggito l'errore, domani correggo il nome della via e cambio il tag addr:street dei civici
Grazie per la segnalazione
dgitto (2022-02-20 11:55:47+00:00): Sì controlla ma ho effettuato già la modifica. Stavo proprio sistemando delle concordanze tra name e addr:street
eggie (2020-10-17 13:59:06+00:00): Dag Lars.. Het Kruitvat per abuis verplaatst.
Vaak gebeurt dat als je schuift met de kaart in editmodus. ....beter niet doen.
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92624520

MVG,
eggie
naveenpf (2020-10-30 10:49:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM India. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on. https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92625063
user_11818089 (2020-10-17 20:20:32+00:00): Hi, I did I survey in the area and there's a little shop across the school that doesn't show up in the aerial imagery yet
danieldegroot2 (2020-10-18 12:55:19+00:00): You should add source=survey to the shop.
Also, unless the park has a sign saying it's a park, it is likely not a park. It has a very small area for a park.
user_11818089 (2020-10-18 15:28:38+00:00): Officially, it is a park, but I guess on a practical level it is a playground
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:20:25+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
aweech (2020-10-18 19:35:45+00:00): I'm guessing you're the same person that was banned for vandalism here, but maybe you're not. In any case, please stop vandalism. OpenStreetMap is not your personal toy to wreck as you please.
hocu (2020-10-23 12:19:22+00:00): Hi, is that pool removed now? I can see it in different satellite imagery sources.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92625922