piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Sothyma (2020-12-23 11:45:17+00:00): Die Luftbilder von 2015 sind nicht mehr aktuell. Ich habe den Strassenverlauf nochmals angepasst und verbessert. Jetzt stimmt es recht gut. Basis meiner Daten sind die Luftbilder von https://map.geo.admin.ch/ sowie meine Begehungen vor Ort.
GartenStuhl (2020-12-23 11:54:03+00:00): Soweit ich weiss dürfen die map.geao.admin.ch Daten (noch) nicht für OSM genutzt werden.
Allerdings sehe ich auch auf diesen Bildern einen Weg der nördlich entlang der Deponie entlang führt. Ist dieser nicht mehr vorhanden und man muss neu durch die Deponie laufen?
Sothyma (2020-12-23 14:01:49+00:00): Hallo mrohner_ch 
Danke für Ihre Hinweise zu meinen Anpassungen. Dass man sich nicht auf die Luftbilder von map.geo.admin.ch beziehen darf wusste ich nicht. Auf den Bilddaten von „Esri Weltbilder“ sind die Wege auch ersichtlich. Den Weg welchen Sie beschrieben (von Süd nach Nord) existiert auch nicht mehr. In diesem Bereich wurden neue Bäume und Sträucher angepflanzt. 
Ist es eigentlich möglich mit Hilfe von Bildern die Änderungen zu dokumentieren? Das würde es tatsächlich einfacher machen. 
Freundliche Grüsse 
Sothyma
GartenStuhl (2020-12-24 05:18:50+00:00): Salü Sothyma
Es ist immer relativ schwierig zu sagen, von wo man was in OSM eintragen darf und wo lieber nicht und zum teil darf man aber nicht so viel... Schrecklich. Hat aber mit dem Urheberrecht zu tun. Ab nächstem Jahr (ich glaube März) dürfen wir aber alles mit den Swisstopo-Daten machen, soweit ich das verstanden habe.
Am allereinfachsten geht das mit den Bildern per imgur.com, dort kann man ohne Anmeldung/Registrierung Bilder hochladen und hier dann verlinken. Wie lange die allerdings vorhalten weiss ich nicht, aber kurz ein Bildchen versenden geht. (Da geht auch jede andere Image-hosting-Plattform.)
Teilweise werden Bilder auch über google.drive freigegeben, etc.
Dann könnte man sich einen Account bei Mapillary machen und mit dessen App vom Smartphone sogar ganze Routen (oder auch Einzelbilder) hochladen. Diese Bilder kann man dann unter anderem direkt hier im Browser beim bearbeiten anzeigen lassen (oder auch in den Kommentaren verlinken).
Aber: Mapillary wurde erst kürzlich an Facebook verkauft...
Für weitere Fragen wegen den Bildern beantworte ich gerne per private Nachricht hier in OSM, dass die Changesets nicht so lange werden ;)
Polarbear-repair (2020-12-28 00:36:22+00:00): Hi NicoSa,
prima, dass du das vor Ort besichtigt hast. 
Bauarbeiter wissen allerdings meist wenig über die zukünftigen Planungen, die sind mehr auf ihre Tagesaufgabe orientiert.
Martin Borsje (2020-12-23 12:59:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
berndw (2020-12-24 14:35:33+00:00): Auch das nahkauf-Geschäft ist weg?
Und die Pension Thalgartner?
Ich baue die Gebäude wieder auf. ihr macht den Rest
Bernd
opendcc (2020-12-25 09:49:20+00:00): Ich habe die Touristinfo angeschrieben. Nahkauf ist wohl aufgegeben.
OrDal (2020-12-23 09:21:48+00:00): Hi,
Are you sure mapping depopulated localities is necessary?
Most of these places have no trace on the ground.
For that matter, throughout history there have been tens of thousands of settlements in the this area that are not inhabited today, not just from the Ottoman-British period.
Anyone looking for information about settlements from this period can find sites dedicated to this purpose, such as https://palopenmaps.org/
I'm not sure adding these places to OSM is necessary.
OrDal (2020-12-23 09:52:01+00:00): Also, aome of these places should be tagged historic=hamlet and not historic=village. some of these places were populated by less than 100 people.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-23 09:53:33+00:00): I understand that they've been depopulated for 70 years now, and that many of them are either built on top, or forested, or just an open field.

So, I'm not really mapping them exactly. The tags I'm using, won't show up on any of OSM's final maps. But if you search the name of the former locality, it'll show a dot on the map, with basic information and links.

The difference between the specific localities that were depopulated during 1948 (and 1967 ,eg Latrun, and destroyed Israeli settlements in WB (2005), Gaza, Sinai too, I've updated 2 of the WB ones, I'll get to the rest later too), and the many other localities that have come and gone, on this land over centuries is that, these are well listed and extensively written about, researched, referenced and looked up, a lot more often, and for purposes beyond simple archeology.

Similarly, I've noticed many nodes, referencing for example, an ancient crusader fort that doesn't exist other than some bricks anymore. Since, these forts are prominent and highly discussed landmarks

Hmmmm perhaps tagging the specific link for each locality from https://palopenmaps.org/ on each node would be a useful addition too.
OrDal (2020-12-23 09:58:54+00:00): Of course, these localities are well documented, and this is for political reasons of those who oppose the Israeli presence in the area. Unfortunately it seems that you too are taking part in spreading this propaganda, and I ask you to stop.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-23 10:13:23+00:00): true, I've started following the 200 limit for hamlet v village.

I'm not engaging in spreading propaganda though. The information I'm inputting is well cited and historical. I'm not even inputting "Cause of depopulation", which is a controversial political matter. Obviously a lot of elements in WB, GS, and Israel proper is by nature sensitive and political. Roads, walls, checkpoints, localities, boundaries. 

But I don't see why inputting correct, well cited, and undisputed information with regards to historic villages and hamlets in OSM would be wrong.
OrDal (2020-12-23 10:37:23+00:00): These places have no value for the map, as most of them does not exist anymore and have no trace on ground. The only value of these places is their political value. As you wrote, all of these places are well documented already, so there is no reason to add them in OSM.

Word aside: Sadly, for the sake of Palestinian propaganda, the suffering of Palestinian refugees continues. While refugees from other wars in the world receive a settlement solution elsewhere, the future of the the new generations is sacrificed for the palestinian propaganda aimed at extorting donations and ultimately eliminating Israel.  Palestinian "refugeeness" is passed down from generation to generation. The continued memory of these places only intensifies the suffering of the refugees. This must be stopped.

There are many ways to improve the map, so for example your mapping of landuses is very valuable, the name tags you added are valuable, keep working on it.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-23 11:22:41+00:00): I agree,  yes they don't have any value to be shown on a map. But I disagree that they shouldn't exist at all on OSM as nodes that can be searched. They are well researched, and all have a rather thorough wikipedia page, in English and Arabic, and sometimes Hebrew and other languages as well. Ive linked their wikidata too. 

We aren't really trying to tell a political story on OSM, we are trying to reflect reality. And the fact that these localities existed in the past, but are depopulated and don't exist anymore, is a reality. So I want to best reflect that. I think that, that's a useful addition to OSM. I'm trying to provide citation for each node too, I'll add more if necessary. 

I really do not want to make OSM a place of political fighting and negotiation. I am biased of course, as everyone is, but my goal isn't to pursue a "Palestinian propaganda".

If you remember, we had a discussion, and I was in favor of a pretty big mapping change that any Palestinian politician wouldve disagreed with. Im talking about reducing Gaza's maritime borders to what IDF unilaterally enforces.

So, if there's any tag you'd prefer, that would be more appropriate, instead of "historical=village,hamlet+ruins=yes" let me know. Or if any additional tag or information would help.
NFZANMNIM (2020-12-23 11:34:37+00:00): What do you think of these tags?

abandoned:place=village
abandoned:place=hamlet 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:place
ququruzka (2020-12-25 23:50:15+00:00): Поліцейський! встань і йди!
AlexRiabtsev (2020-12-28 08:24:03+00:00): нє, то краще "Бандера, вставай!" iykwim
axelr (2020-12-24 09:38:45+00:00): Du hast mehr als 10 Fehler eingebaut. Ich werd das heut nachmittag korrigieren. Die Routen haben nach public_transport kein forward oder backward, die Wege müssen in Reihenfolge als eine geschlossene Linie stehen.
Eugen Tillspiegel (2020-12-24 11:16:34+00:00): Zunächst einmal habe ich mehrere grobe Fehler im Linienverlauf beseitigt, und eine veraltete Strecke entfernt. Des Weiteren dient nach meiner Kenntnis das Anzeigen der Richtung einer Buslinie dazu, zB auf der ÖPNV-Karte zu sehen, in welcher Richtung der Bus seine Route abfährt. Das ist nämlich bei der Linie 303 genau anders herum.
axelr (2020-12-24 16:39:16+00:00): Ich stell das mal zurück. Die Pfeile auf der ÖPNV-Karte habe ich bisher als Einbahnstraßen gesehen. Im Übergang vom letzten Kreisel nach Rotenburg Bahnhof zeigen die Pfeile gegen die Fahrtrichtung.
Frohes Fest, Axel
Heinz_V (2020-12-24 08:40:23+00:00): I fixed the remaining errors (unconnected ways) in the region Bundi/Talera.
 For all your mapping this is important: „Adding buildings or roads or any other objects through RapiD without properly reviewing every single one is considered an import and therefore must follow the import guidelines“. This is still valid, if you map with JOSM.
All results of MAPWITHAI have to be controlled manually. It is a severe error to declare all roads in a region as residential or unclasified. And there are other errors which show that you do not control the results of MAPWITHAI.  I looked for the FACEBOOK mappers who work in a similiar way. I could not find important errors for VLD116. That means, it is possible to work with MAPWITHAI successfully.
mavl (2021-01-14 17:43:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 97508399, 97505597 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97427780].
alessandrocarmeli (2020-12-28 16:34:50+00:00): Invalid tag modification
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96309186
ivanbranco (2020-12-28 19:43:09+00:00): Ciao Alessandro,

l'alert "Invalid tag modification" è già visibile di default su OSMCha, non c'è bisogno di riportarlo come commento. Poi bisogna anche vedere a cosa fa riferimento, spesso sono falsi positivi, in questo caso per esempio ha segnalato l'eliminazione delle etichette dalla linea outer del parco: gli stessi tag sono stati semplicemente "spostati" da Cascafico alla relazione multipoligono, correttamente e come da specifiche segnalate dalla wiki, che ti consiglio di leggere.
AntonioLago (2021-09-07 10:39:06+00:00): Este conjunto de cambios afecta a una relación que en mi opinión debería eliminarse:
La relación 2646821 (etiquetada como GR94 Gran Recorrido Rural Gallego) solamente contiene una pista de 800 m + otra relación 1614485 que a su vez contiene casi todo el trazado de este recorrido GR94.
Estoy arreglando esta última relación que está algo rota. La primera de las relaciones no aporta nada.
¿Alguien se opone a su borrado?
Saludos.
小智智 (2020-12-27 09:55:11+00:00): Please don't mess up bus routes.

Bus stops must be added with role of "platform" IN THE EXACT STOPPING ORDER, and ways must be added in the exact order.

Also please make changes only after the reorganisation is effective.
hossein132 (2020-12-23 09:25:26+00:00): لطفا اسامی جاده ها بررسی شوند 
آیا مهردشت نجف آباد صحیح است یا دهق نجف آباد؟
آیا علویجه دهق صحیح است یا دهق اصفهان؟
Ali00098 (2020-12-23 16:50:24+00:00): دهق - نجف آباد
https://khabarban.com/a/29614965

با تغییر های غلط دیگر کاربران را فریب ندهید. حیله شما بسیار آشکار و خنده دار است
phaerrax (2021-01-03 11:07:57+00:00): I find it a bit odd to see a (single!) cliff in the Anctartic and a road in England edited in the same changeset. Was this intentional? (A more explicative changeset comment would have helped to understand what you meant to do).
Anyway, it would be best to keep the spatial extension of the changesets small, unlike this one. This results in a lot of users between Europe, Africa and the Middle East being notified, even if they have nothing to do with the areas involved in your edits. Next time please consider splitting your edits in smaller changesets, so that they are relevant to a single area. This helps the mapping community keep track of issues within the map.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
VShkaberda (2020-12-23 20:24:02+00:00): Why the name is "Gfucjcjck"?
eggie (2020-12-25 13:37:02+00:00): Dag 2-B  Je vraagt steeds om een review, maar reageert geen enkele maal op vragen van medemappers die je tups geven.
MVG,
eggie
Jakka (2021-06-16 08:00:11+00:00): voor opeenvolgende huisnummers mag je eerste nummer liggend streepje laatste huisnummer noteren. Zo vermijd je de lange rij.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
nielsdg (2021-06-16 08:20:54+00:00): Probleem is dan toch dat je ook de oneven nummers meeneemt?
nielsdg (2021-06-16 08:21:17+00:00): Euh, de even nummers in dit geval
Jakka (2021-06-16 08:32:43+00:00): mmm daar heb je een punt ... interpolation wordt niet echt uitgelegd op een gebouw ?
nielsdg (2021-06-16 10:13:50+00:00): inderdaad. Zoals het er nu staat, denk ik ook niet dat het hier per se kan gebruikt worden
LorenzoPesci (2020-12-27 16:51:29+00:00): Chiedo una verifica ulteriore visto che non trovo conferme sulla apertura. https://www.umbriajournal.com/economia/trasporti-economia/beffati-da-burocrazia-rimandata-inaugurazione-ferrovia-spoleto-campello-388028/
tyr_asd (2020-12-27 17:17:47+00:00): 👀
PT-53 (2020-12-23 14:36:46+00:00): Hallo changchun_1,
gem. OSM-Verkehrszeichen-Tool
wird die Verkehrszeichen-Kombination DE:240,1026-36
mit
access=agricultural + ..
eingetragen, so wie es ja vor Deiner Änderung bereits war. Ich habe Deine Änderung daher wieder zurückgesetzt.
Grüße

http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240,1026-36
PT-53 (2020-12-23 14:49:13+00:00): Hallo changchun_1, 
die Verkehrszeichen-Kombination DE:262:6;DE:1026-36
wird gem. OSM-Tool korrekt mit
maxweith=6
maxweight:conditional=none @ (agricultural)
eingetragen. Ich dies so angepaßt.

http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=262%5B6%5D,1026-36
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33701224
changchun_1 (2020-12-24 15:22:36+00:00): Hallo PT53,
danke für den Tip, aber wenn wir es richtig machen dann ganz richtig. Ich würde den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33701224 als 
highway=unclassified
maxweight:conditional=none @ (agricultural)
maxweight=6
traffic_sign=DE:262[6],1026-36
smoothness=good
surface=asphalt einstufen und alles andere entfernen.
siehe auch Bilder entlang des Weges.
https://openstreetcam.org/details/2874382/303/track-info links auf dem Bild kann man die Schilder erkennen. Aber das überlasse ich dir.
Gruß
Matthias
changchun_1 (2020-12-24 15:52:29+00:00): Ach ja hab noch was vergessen.
Schöne Weihnachten :-)
PT-53 (2020-12-24 16:19:54+00:00): Hallo Matthias,
ich kenne diesen Weg recht gut, da ich ihn schon mehrfach mit dem Rad befahren habe.
Ich sehe keinen Bedarf diesen auf unclassified hochzustufen. Dies würde nicht seiner Verkehrsbedeutung entsprechen. Track ist vollkommen ausreichend.

Auch Dir frohe Weihnachten
zvenzzon (2021-10-14 16:05:36+00:00): Why is way 142526091 changed from pedestrian to service? This is definitely incorrect. I think there are also more errors in this area outside the main entrance for Falu Lasarett. Something is not right about this service roads and parking. Resurvey recommended.
novabeat (2021-10-14 16:46:16+00:00): Hi. I didn't change the road type but I think I just answered a quest in StreetComplete about the surface which was asphalt.

I agree that this area probably could use some resurveying but I live in Stockholm and was just there for a visit :) so I can't do it.
zvenzzon (2021-10-14 16:53:00+00:00): In this changeset the highway tag changed value from pedestrian to service. But don't worry. This is my home town. I will see what I can do.
zvenzzon (2021-10-14 17:07:37+00:00): Now I've cleaned up and mapped the features i know for sure is there. The most important road, footway and parking is present now at least.
olo81 (2021-03-06 22:10:27+00:00): Tu nie ma dworca autobusowego, błędne tagowanie !
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8254206355
olo81 (2021-03-06 22:11:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=bus%20station?uselang=pl
C2oc4 (2021-03-08 09:19:34+00:00): Szanowny panie proszę bez zbędnych "!"
opendcc (2020-12-25 09:44:59+00:00): Ist das Gebäude bei der Autowerkstatt abgerissen oder ist das irrtümlich gelöscht worden?
sskalyan (2021-01-23 05:30:28+00:00): Hi Jengelh,

According to this page https://www.friedland.de/startseite/aktuelles/sperrung-heidkopftunnel.html  construction work was set to conclude by 28/Dec/2020. Kindly relook at construction progress and update the road (if any).

Thanks in advance,
Kalyan
jengelh (2021-01-23 19:02:26+00:00): Thanks for the reminder.
sskalyan (2021-01-25 05:04:31+00:00): Hi Jengelh,

Thanks for the prompt action and response. 

Regards,
Kalyan
Martin Borsje (2020-12-23 12:59:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
user_5359 (2020-12-23 16:09:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't use key Building instead building. Please have also a look on https://www.osm.org/way/887797687. You add only the wrong key "Building" on node not the way. Please check yours edits on way without tags.
SomeoneElse (2020-12-23 10:26:53+00:00): Despite https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125554582/history being "mentioned in despatches" in this changeset, it wasn't actually modified.
canfe (2020-12-30 14:21:48+00:00): Se è una frazione è addr:place e non addr:street perché nelle frazioni appunto, non ci sono strade con toponomastica.
eggie (2020-12-23 14:21:46+00:00): Dag Tomm.. Volgens de BGT en het kadaster is dit toch werkelijk de Kroonnweide met twee n's 
Wat is je bron in deze?

Het lijkt me beter deze changeset terug te draaien
Graag reactie
MVG,
eggie

Zie ook 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=kroonnweide&resultOffset=0&objectId=1742200000037073&geometry.x=231003.6&geometry.y=480035.005&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=1742010000010488
eggie (2020-12-23 14:27:03+00:00): reverted by changeset #96332270

Je wijziging heb ik teruggedraaid. 
Mocht je een andere bron hebben dan hoor ik het graag.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-23 14:27:56+00:00): typo .. en Tom is natuurlijk met met één m..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
limes11 (2021-01-07 22:51:03+00:00): Hi,

schau bitte mal auf Note

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2485737

Danke!

Gruss, Limes
themartinix (2021-01-08 15:01:49+00:00): Hi, zurück;
ist erledigt und der Fehler behoben.
Danke für den Hinweis, und noch weiter fröhliches Mappen.
Zur Zeit dauert es länger als gewöhnlich bis Änderungen sichtbar werden :-(...
Gruß, themartinix.
seattlefyi (2020-12-23 18:08:03+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the edit! One comment: Since the business location may have closed but the address usually remains for the next tenant, I put the address back (we'd like to not lose those!) and removed just the tags related to the closed business. Thanks again, hope to see more!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
VA00 (2021-02-28 09:01:33+00:00): A czy przecinka leśna w śladzie rurociągu zostanie na stałe, czy tylko na czas robót ziemnych? Sporo dróg leśnych w ten sposób ,,zniszczono''.
C2oc4 (2021-03-01 07:55:24+00:00): Dzień dobry. Nie wiem czy zostanie. Patrząc na inne rejony kraju sadze ze powinna zostać. Drogi „powinni” naprawić.
Eifelkobold! (2020-12-23 17:19:01+00:00): Guten Abend Reino Baptista,

ich sehe, dass du die Gebäude und Innenhöfe von Burg Satzvey edititiert hast. Leider stimmen diese nun nicht mehr mit dem überein, was vor Ort, auf Luftbildern (weder im von dir angegebenen Esri noch auf aktuelleren z. B. digitales Ortophoto NRW) sowie in ALKIS NRW zu sehen ist. Auch amenity=marketplace passt hier nicht zu den "Märkten", die vor Ort stattfinden und laut WIki für die Verwendung des Tags vorgesehen sind. Zudem wurden Wege, die bisher korrekt als path getaggt waren, zu footways umgwandelt.

Warst du vor Ort? Anhand welcher Daten hast du die Änderungen vorgenommen? 

LG und schöne Weihnachtstage

SOKO GC
Eifelkobold! (2020-12-24 18:44:35+00:00): Guten Abend Reino Baptista,

ich habe mir deine Änderungen an Burg Satzvey noch einmal angeschaut und weitere Fehler gefunden. Daher habe ich deine Änderungen in Änderungssatz 96399852 nun zurückgesetzt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96399852).

LG und schöne Weihnachtstage

SOKO GC
trigpoint (2020-12-26 11:29:31+00:00): Hi, this gate being access=private seems highly unlikely as this road is part of NCN 82 so walkers and cyclists are obviously allowed through.

It appears on OS opendata as a public road and my gut reaction is simply a gated road.

What sources are you using to believe that the road is private?

Cheers Phil
Richard (2020-12-26 12:24:03+00:00): I've cycled this and it's definitely not a private gate. Removed access=private.
back_spin (2020-12-26 16:08:15+00:00): Hi! There was information from the customers that it was not possible to drive in this place. To that end I've added fixme=access. Thanks for the fix!
Richard (2020-12-26 16:11:57+00:00): If it's "not possible to drive" there's two things to break out:

* "drive" implies motor vehicles - so any access tag change should be "motor_vehicle=" rather than "access=".

* this is a very narrow (and badly maintained) road, so I can see that it could be difficult to drive, but access tags are strictly for stuff that is _illegal_ to drive. If "not possible" means that a car can't physically get through, it's better to use surface and width tags rather than access tags.