piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jmapb (2021-01-28 21:25:09+00:00): Good question. I'll be in the area next week and check it out, if you don't find the answer sooner. J
jmapb (2021-02-01 22:08:14+00:00): A simple solution, if a little unsatisfying: Red Hook Lane is open again.
maraf24 (2020-11-25 00:05:34+00:00): Budynki można po narysowaniu wyprostować naciskając S.
I nie trzeba przepisywać adresów, można użyć funkcji Scalanie - scala adres z budynkiem.
Betanyahoo (2020-11-30 20:29:24+00:00): Are you sure about the alignment of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11964467 arroyo?
ElectricJellyfish (2020-12-02 15:27:37+00:00): Hello Betanyahoo! Thanks for reaching out. I’m not sure about the alignment of this waterway. The edits I made to it were adding culvert tunnel tags as seen in aerial imagery and mapillary. This was done at several locations including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/876989414 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/876636871. Let me know if you have any further questions, thanks.
jaap de vries (2021-01-07 08:24:16+00:00): Beste,
Zou je de opmerking ook kunnen sluiten als je een bewerking doet?  Zie ook: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2376280 scheelt een hoop rode kruisjes, dank alvast :)
philippec (2022-05-09 17:52:29+00:00): Ik zie dit drinkwaterfonteintje ZW niet
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1388710331600650
philippec (2022-05-09 17:59:16+00:00): ZO ook niet. 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=556975482699246
JeroenHoek (2020-11-25 12:18:28+00:00): name:nl is ook 'Wetterskip Fryslân'. Dit waterschap heeft één naam, en hanteert deze ook in Nederlandstalige teksten.

Zie bijvoorbeeld: https://www.wetterskipfryslan.nl/ of https://www.waterschappen.nl/mijn-waterschap/

Zal ik het aanpassen?
JeroenHoek (2020-11-25 12:20:33+00:00): In Nederlandstalige media wordt het ook zo gebruikt: https://www.lc.nl/friesland/Heerenveen-geen-zorgen-over-vervuiling-door-granuliet-in-De-Deelen-26228832.html

Of: https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2019/08/11/de-muis-is-moeilijk-te-stoppen-a3969766
JeroenHoek (2020-11-25 12:23:52+00:00): Grappig om te zien dat de waterschapsgrens niet 100% met de provincie overeenkomt trouwens.
A67-A67 (2020-11-25 13:44:59+00:00): Bedankt! Ik heb het aangepast. 

De waterschapsgrenzen volgen de stroomgebieden en de grenzen van polders, de provinciegrenzen niet. Dat zorgt voor de kleine afwijkingen op veel plekken. Het was wel veel extra werk, omdat ik dacht dat ik gewoon de provinciegrens kon volgen, maar toen overal kleine afwijkingen moest toevoegen.
EarlEBird (2020-11-24 19:55:19+00:00): Correction: Mapillary was also cited.
ovruni (2020-11-24 22:18:29+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado la vía LA-551 a highway=footway [0], también se han agregado vías primarias [1] no existentes en la zona, de la misma forma el uso de la etiqueta name [1] esta destinado solamente para calles que cuenten con un nombre. Por este motivo he revertido el conjunto de cambios. Por favor, revise la documentación en la wiki [3] de OSM para mayor información sobre el uso de las etiquetas.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dprimary
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:name
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org
Osmwithspace (2022-10-26 16:28:56+00:00): Heißt das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203945374 wirklich "TÜV Süd Akademie"? Und ist das noch aktuell?
ALu68 (2022-10-26 21:30:43+00:00): Ich habe in diesem CS nur die Knoten bzgl des aktuellen Luftbild angepasst.

Allerdings bin ich kritisch, die Namen der Einrichtungen an das Gebäude zu heften - das sollte mit einem separaten Knoten mit amenity, office, shop, ... erfolgen.
Osmwithspace (2022-10-27 10:39:11+00:00): Ok. Ich dachte, vielleicht weist du das...
Dann erstelle ich einen Hinweis.
InsertUser (2020-11-26 20:49:00+00:00): Have you individually verified this mechanical edit?
Ze0zohk1 (2020-11-29 13:26:11+00:00): @ InsertUser: No I haven't. I was not aware of the fact that I am supposed to.
InsertUser (2020-11-29 14:09:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Ze0zohk1 (2020-11-29 14:31:29+00:00): Thank you for the link. I now know better.
skquinn (2020-12-02 09:48:45+00:00): I'd say in this case it's a pretty obvious capitalization/spelling error. That said, these types of edits should still be split up by country and not lumped into one big huge changeset spanning (most of) the planet.
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-04 06:05:40+00:00): Hello skquinn. I didn't mention this until now: I was motivated by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_correct_errors . I understand that this does not mean "change it for the whole planet". Sorry for doing so and sorry if that caused you any inconveniences.
PT-53 (2020-11-25 07:57:16+00:00): Hallo Loneship,
wenn Du vor Ort warst könntest Du dann die Access-Merkmale an der Zufahrt noch berichtigen? 
So
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357170255/history
ist das nicht korrekt.

Im OSM-Verkehrszeichen-Tool kannst Du die Verkehrszeichen anklicken und die richtigen Access-Merkmale übernehmen.
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Grüße
PT-53 (2020-11-25 08:05:15+00:00): Dies Zufahrt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207997376/history
ist (korrekt) als Service-Way eingezeichnet. Allerdings ist der Service-Way nur mit Track-Ways verbunden. Das ist falsch. Die "gesamte" Zufahrt - ab der L 275 - sollte als Service-Way eingestuft werden und mit den entspr. Access-Merkmalen versehen werden.
Grüße
Loneship (2020-11-30 17:43:37+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe die Zufahrtswege an beiden Standort korrigiert, das sollte jetzt so passen. Auf die Beschilderung am Österberg habe ich nicht geachtet, daher habe ich dort keine Access-Tags gesetzt oder geändert.
Viele Grüße
PT-53 (2020-12-06 12:30:57+00:00): Danke noch für die Rückmeldung und Ergänzungen.
Grüße
czubi (2020-11-25 08:11:41+00:00): Hallo Balewupp,
wir bilden in OSM nur die access Regeln ab die RECHTLICHER Natur sind. Also bicycle=no wirklich nur wenn dort ein rechtlich verbindliches Verkehrsschild steht welches Radfahren verbietet. Persönliche MEinungen ob man da Radfahren KANN spielen keine Rolle. Dies entscheidet der Router aus den Tags smoothness, width, surface, incline usw. für jede Fortbewegungsart separat. Das ist WICHTIG.
access=no ist in 99% aller Fälle falsch, denn es überschreibt die anderen Access Werte. 
Weiterhin muss man wissen das es implizierte access Werte gibt.
Kann man hier nachschauen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
Diese Werte sollte man nicht noch einmal angeben.Es sei denn sie sind nicht so wie die implizierten Werte.
Stimmt die incline-Richtung?
width=0 ist sicher ein Schreibfehler? Dezimaltrennzeiche ist ein Punkt, also für 0,5m Breite wäre es width=0.5.
czubi (2020-11-25 08:15:21+00:00): Achso: Da das mit den rechtlichen access Werten oft falsch ist wäre es wünschenswert das, wenn es access Regeln gibt, diese mit den entsprechenden Verkehrsschildern zu untermauern, dann können es die anderen Mapper nachvollziehen. Bei bicycle=no wäre dann eben ein zusätzliches traffic_sign=DE:254
Balewupp (2020-11-25 08:26:23+00:00): Ok, denke ich hab’s verstanden.

Andere Frage unwichtige Frage, im Stadtgebiet sind Gebäude nicht dargestellt die teilweise schon 100 Jahre stehen, wer kümmert sich darum?
czubi (2020-11-25 09:11:13+00:00): Es gibt nicht den einen der sich kümmert. Wer Lust und Zeit hat machts. Ich schau bei Gelegenheit nochmal drüber.
Irgend eine bestimmte Stelle die dir negativ aufgefallen ist?
vorpalblade-kaart (2020-12-01 17:29:03+00:00): Did you intend to delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449879791? It is still visible on all publicly available imagery. And the deletion definitely does not match your changeset comment.

If you did intend to delete the way, it would have been nice to know why (e.g., the road was razed/demolished).

If that deletion was accidental, were the rest of the ways deleted in this changeset also accidental deletions?
Alan Bragg (2020-12-01 19:08:40+00:00): Good catch. That was an accident. Surprises me because I usually catch something like that with JOSM validation indicating that there were other unconnected ways in the area. I've been working on updating Maine roads for many months and have touched thousands of roads that are misnamed, misaligned, non-existent or tiger junk.
 Thanks for the help.
vorpalblade-kaart (2020-12-01 19:37:00+00:00): No problem. I thought it was probably accidental, but it might not have been. You are a bit more local than I am, after all.

I don't know if you are going to revert the deletions, or just redraw the road, but either way, good luck, and have fun. :)
Nicolas59380 (2020-11-24 22:12:45+00:00): I created a broken MP here, will fix it now
fjavier_gr (2022-03-06 13:58:29+00:00): Información sobre la futura variante. https://www.lacomarcadepuertollano.com/la-variante-norte-de-puertollano-echa-a-andar-con-la-lista-de-expropiaciones-y-con-el-proyecto-de-trazado
Nicolas59380 (2020-11-24 22:12:59+00:00): I created a broken MP here, will fix it now
bxl-forever (2020-11-25 01:23:32+00:00): Hello,
Please stop adding names to pedestrian areas.
Those areas were tagged with noname=yes for a reason.
The names are on the main roads across the area, but this area is for routing (and rendering).  If you name it twice that creates all sorts of validation problems.
I’ll try to clean it up tomorrow.
jncn (2020-11-25 10:29:12+00:00): Makes sense—the reason why I did this, is because it's present on the other part as well. So it should be cleaned up there too.
canfe (2023-06-01 10:11:47+00:00): Credo che in base alla regola citata, le panchine debbano essere taggate come oggetti separate e non facenti parte della pianta.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
alesarrett (2023-06-01 10:39:40+00:00): Sì, concordo in generale. In questo caso peŕò mi sembra di ricordare siano delle sedute circolari attorno ai tronchi con lo schienale che è il tronco stesso... Non sapevo bene cosa mettere
blackboxlogic (2020-12-04 00:37:34+00:00): Please use "Road" instead of "Rd" in names.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94730333
ottwiz (2020-11-24 21:46:11+00:00): I also aligned Grave Creek, that's why the changeset is a bit big in the county.
Max-Kritic (2020-11-25 18:39:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8162532743 ?? 
Nœud “place“ sans attribut “name”
Nœud avec “place”=“islet” mais sans nom
node 8162532743 josm iD edit
place = islet 

Cela ne sert à rien et c'est une erreur.

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/FyBlur
blackboxlogic (2020-12-04 00:36:49+00:00): In OSM, we don't use abbreviations in street names. Please use "Road" instead of "Rd".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94731424
Heinz_V (2020-12-03 08:05:15+00:00): A lot of roads a going directly through houses.
cmi3j89d9o (2020-12-11 08:20:48+00:00): There are may be a alignment issue of satellite imagery as India has not public high resolution satellite imagery available
Heinz_V (2020-12-11 16:19:51+00:00): Ok, but the houses or the roads have to be moved.
!bm (2020-11-25 10:20:25+00:00): Kennst du eine App, die noch auf office=therapist angewiesen ist? Laut wiki nicht falsch, aber veraltet: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dtherapist
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94731687
KyL0VV (2020-11-25 18:18:21+00:00): Ich habe festgestellt, dass auf der Webseite openstreetmap.org einfach nicht mal ein Punkt eingetragen war und der tag office=* das Problem zumindest visuell behebt - offensichtlich sind die tags bei healthcare=* noch nicht vollständig sichtbar gemacht worden. Any advice?
!bm (2020-11-25 18:26:14+00:00): Das ist natürlich ärgerlich, aber osm-carto verzichtet auf Etliches, da die Karte sonst überladen wäre. Sie soll ja auch nur als Referenz dienen. Siehe dazu auch OSM-Grundlagen, konkret: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_for_the_renderer
Pontius (2020-11-24 23:09:36+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I think historical performances at venues may be outside of the scope of OSM though.
SomeoneElse (2020-11-24 23:25:09+00:00): Maybe https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ would be a good way to represent this data?
user_5093788 (2020-11-26 14:00:26+00:00): Please don't remove driveways, even if you think they are unnecessary.
ottorol (2020-11-26 05:20:52+00:00): line 877309303. Where does the information about the existence of the lane in this place come from? Coordinates: 56.77584, 60.35294
tealeaf6 (2020-12-01 01:16:31+00:00): Hi, thanks for reaching out! I have used Maxar Premium Imagery to add these service roads, including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/877309303. The road looks clear and defined here on this imagery source. Please feel free to reach out if you have other questions.
eggie (2020-11-24 23:04:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. 
Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM. Maak altijd een combinatie met bv shop=yes   of shop=bakery
Pas dan wordt de naam zichtbaar.
Verder kun je toevoegen
phone=+31...
website=
opening_hours=
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-11-27 14:13:05+00:00): shop=yes tag toegevoegd
mitchef (2020-12-13 00:14:35+00:00): If the route doesn't exist then the relation should be deleted not just some of the members. It seems to have been imported from a gov dataset that no longer exists but the local council has a reference to the route https://geelongaustralia.com.au/parks/paths/article/item/8cca45ae36931b2.aspx
stevage (2020-12-13 23:13:24+00:00): Interesting. What is the policy these days? I know in the past we have removed trails that only existed online, for which there is zero physical evidence. In this case, there are two decent stretches of bike path, but they're not signed "Bay Trail", and there's no linking signage between them. It just seems a bit of a fantasy that this "trail" exists.
mitchef (2020-12-14 02:40:19+00:00): I agree that there doesn't seem to be any signage. I don't think the policy has changed. So do we delete the relation?
MikeN (2020-11-26 13:34:46+00:00): Hi, why was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766912500 removed?
Ewen Hill (2020-12-06 20:39:42+00:00): Hi Luke, there is a comment regarding these changes. If Market Lane is only proposed then it should be marked highway=proposed
Ewen Hill (2020-12-06 20:41:23+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2453209
taketaketake (2020-12-07 10:51:53+00:00): 破壊行為をしないで下さい
Minh Nguyen (2020-11-25 06:43:00+00:00): By the way, changeset 94727436 had originally attempted to place the monolith in the valley, but using Esri imagery. The monolith’s shadow is pretty clear in Esri imagery, but that layer is offset from Bing imagery.
mueschel (2020-11-25 08:28:15+00:00): Please check all your edits. You added many tags with spelling mistakes, e.g.

WATERWAT:TYPE
waterway:tyPE
waterway:typE
waterway:TYPE
waterway;TYPE
waterway_TYPE
WTAERWAY:TYPE
ottorol (2020-11-26 05:11:21+00:00): line 877320014. where does the data come from? I do not see any matches for the images existing in the system.
tealeaf6 (2020-11-30 18:53:52+00:00): Hi, thank you for reaching out. I have used ESRI World Imagery to add these residential highways, including https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/877320014. The roads here appear clear and access the buildings. Please feel free to reach out if you have other questions.
mariotomo (2020-11-25 02:39:04+00:00): hola, gracias por intentar mejorar el mapa de Colón.  no le tengas miedo a borrar los errores ajenos.  el edificio ahí al lado no existe, puedes quitarlo.
tekim (2023-05-23 00:58:16+00:00): Lots of private things are mapped in OSM, such as homes, driveways, and tracks on private farms and ranches.
KanaLee (2021-03-26 17:32:09+00:00): Hola Ferchino83,

El límite del barrio El Batán pasó a llamarse Quito. Según tengo entendido, la etiqueta "is_in:city=Quito" debería ser suficiente. Esto también le sucedió a otros barrios en el área y causa etiquetas de nombre duplicadas. Me gustaría volver a cambiar los nombres de estas barrios si está bien. ¿Cuál fue el motivo del cambio de nombre?

Saludos,
Kana
Equipo de Microsoft Open Maps
KanaLee (2021-04-06 22:29:39+00:00): He reseteo las etiquetas name del barrios con sus nombres originales. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102434775

Saludos,
Kana
user_5359 (2020-11-26 04:43:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2020-11-26 04:42:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
felipeeugenio (2020-11-25 12:35:12+00:00): David. Estamos conversando sobre cómo mapear esto y lo repones con los mismos errores.
Además, dentro del area que definiste hay un nodo que dice que hay un colegio.
El colegio está mal ubicado?
Hay convenciones en la comunidad y estas están definidas en la wiki o y en el chat en el link que hay en mi perfil.
Te pido por favor darte un minuto para entender como funciona el proyecto antes de agregar elementos solo por que conoces el lugar.
Te pido por favor contestar las preguntas del otro thread:
1) es un centro de eventos y pasa que los scouts se reunen ahi? o es un recinto exclusivo para los BS?
Hay un colegio ahi o cercano a esa ubicación en donde podamos ubicar los nodos ya existentes?
felipeeugenio (2020-11-25 13:04:54+00:00): Mientras tanto corregí los errores más evidentes.
saludos
mariotomo (2020-11-25 02:28:25+00:00): hola.  no está **tan** mal la mejora que propusiste, pero no está completa y no está correcta.  tu objetivo cuál es?  porqué no mejoras los errores ajenos de al lado?
WoodWoseWulf (2020-11-25 01:44:59+00:00): Hiya 2Woy,

Welcome to OSM!

The water area beyond this line to the West is treated as part of Broken Bay which is a natural=water + water=harbour relation.

Link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1256210

The coastline tag is a bit of a special case as it not only defines the start of the ocean, but it also defines landmasses within the ocean itself (such as mainland Australia). Breaking the coastline by removing sections can cause problems.

I could see how you could mount an argument to include some or all of Broken Bay inside the coastline (possibly after community discussion) but removing a section without any discussion and other fixes is not the correct way to go about this.

More on the coastline tag, here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Coastline
WoodWoseWulf (2020-11-25 02:10:09+00:00): This wiki page is even better as it offers more detail:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline
Supaplex (2020-11-25 02:18:02+00:00): 是關店還是位置錯了?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94737656
Supaplex (2020-11-25 02:19:23+00:00): https://twcoupon.com/brandshop-19453-7_11-%E5%8F%B0%E4%B8%AD%E5%B8%82-%E8%B1%90%E7%92%B0%E9%96%80%E5%B8%82.html
地圖網站已經沒有了，看來是曾經存在過的店
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94737656
Supaplex (2021-04-16 17:31:34+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 10:52:48+00:00): لماذا ام حذف العناصر التالية:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12rW
sovereign_ch (2020-11-25 01:27:03+00:00): CS 94691945, 94694479, 94694706, 94695228, 94696875, 94697343, 94700940, 94701265, 94702907, 94703290. Nicht mit lokalen Mappern abgesprochen, und ohne Abgleich des Bildoffsets zwischen Bing und Esri und Esri (Beta).
Ze0zohk1 (2021-01-11 18:19:49+00:00): Hallo "Der Wilderer",

vielen dank für deine Beiträge zu OSM. Mir ist bei diesem Changeset ein Fehler aufgefallen. Du hast access=Forst verwendet. OSM ist i. d. R. engischsprachig. Richtig wäre access=forestry (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dforestry). Weitere mögliche Werte sind unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access dokumentiert.

Viele Grüße

PS: Betrifft https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7508372927/
OsmAnd_Pieter (2020-11-25 16:04:37+00:00): Can you revert your revert?
You made one of the busiest bus streets a one way after your survey. Emile Carpentier. I just went and had a look and observed busses and cyclists use of the crossing at the part Crickx. yes I live in Kuregem.  the only thing that was wrong was the pedestrian crossing, which by the way is now officially placed in the most dangerous part of the streets. 3 streets + 1 cyslist path (which is by the way not an official path direction East but ok, let us leave it at that as it is the safest place for the cyclists on that perilous crossing).
After that you revert your revert I will do a small correction still to make navigation instructions better and safer.  PS: Always pleasant to have contact if we need to revert stuff. I would have reverted much more if I needed to look at outdated maps.
bxl-forever (2020-11-25 16:42:14+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for your feedback.

I didn’t mean to offend you about the "outdated map" stuff.  It is very common to see other mappers rely on aerial imagery and fail to catch very recent stuff. ;-)

Perhaps it would be better to inspect elements one by one.

Buses: I kept your idea about drawing the bus track on its own along Gouv. Nens, it is fine.

The Nens/Carpentier intersection is probably awkward as it is now.  When I surveyed it in September, it was still barred to eastbound traffic (only westbound buses could go there).  Logically it should be open now.  Since you have local knowledge of that part, feel free to update it.

About the pedestrian crossing: I’m not sure to get your point.  We’re not discussing the merits of having chosen this spot for the crossing, are we?  As for the map, I believe the location is correct, isnt’it?

Cycle track: this one? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850054837)  Is it gone or changed?
Kovoschiz (2020-11-25 14:23:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94740151
Kovoschiz (2020-11-25 14:23:02+00:00): 1. Please put the route to `route_ref=`, if you arent creating a `route=bus` relation yet. 
2. Please don't put its heading in `name=`. This is for the bus stop's name, viz DB Plaza here. If the bus stops are coded in this bus terminus, that can be put into `loc_ref=`. I'm not sure if it's acceptable to put `to=` on a bus stop.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-25 14:33:23+00:00): On a minor note, abbreviations shouldn't be used in general..
Kovoschiz (2020-11-25 15:46:23+00:00): On another side note, `description:en=` is always available.
AndersAndersson (2020-11-25 09:02:56+00:00): Why did you added an isolated road?
Is it an import? From what source?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-01 12:25:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 98511214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some road name change spam in LA