piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2023-01-18 11:29:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark.
Please use the correct highway tag. You tagged here minor, unimportant traces as a main highway. (secondary road)
Please read and follow the tagging info on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
Best regards
YomanNH (2022-12-25 12:37:06+00:00): Cześć,
zauważyłem, że na chodnikach ustawiałeś błędne tagi surface=kostka_brukowa. Poprawiłem to na surface=paving_stones: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130480936
literan (2022-12-03 11:37:51+00:00): в парке стоит не сам Пушкин, а памятник ПушкинУ.
Bierphysik (2023-03-20 08:42:22+00:00): Hi, müsste 1118996449 nicht eigentlich ein junction=roundabout (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Droundabout)sein?
Bierphysik (2023-03-20 08:42:57+00:00): hier korrekter Link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Droundabout
Bierphysik (2023-03-20 08:44:26+00:00): Oder ein junction=circular https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Dcircular
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-03 09:15:55+00:00): Should be reviewed.
◪ Jarv (2022-12-03 12:47:55+00:00): Changeset reverted in 129675091
literan (2022-12-03 11:36:25+00:00): откуда вдруг зарядки для авто посередине парка?
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-03 09:16:01+00:00): Should be reviewed.
◪ Jarv (2022-12-03 12:48:04+00:00): Changeset reverted in 129675091
literan (2022-12-11 09:57:04+00:00): you've broken wood multypoligones. be careful, please
Frans S (2023-01-18 12:04:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A bit late with the review, but I want to show you what you mapped wrongly.
You tagged this path ( more is it not)
as a secondary highway
Please read and follow the tagging info on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
Best regards
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-03 09:16:06+00:00): Should be reviewed.
◪ Jarv (2022-12-03 12:48:02+00:00): Changeset reverted in 129675091
SomeoneElse (2022-12-04 15:29:19+00:00): @Thomas Jarvis - thanks.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-12-06 17:07:19+00:00): Hi, you don't really need to put oneway=no on the roads. They are not oneway by default.
wireguy (2022-12-03 12:55:33+00:00): GLCT, fyi, there are 2 relations that are broken, Cockaponset State Forest and Westwoods, relation 11544918 and
relation 13334050.   There are also several things labeled Westwoods that may need sorting.
Mashin (2022-12-04 18:16:21+00:00): Thanks. I fixed the broken State Forest and Westwood boundaries.
There are still multiple objects names as Westwood: several individual parcels and this large relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11544918
Not sure what the best solution is since the small parcels have some location specific information.
GLCTStewardship (2022-12-04 22:29:04+00:00): Thanks to you both for your reviews, repairs, and thoughtful comments.  I knew I broke the State Forest polygon, but didn't find a way to repair it.  Thanks for taking care of that.  Regarding the repeated Westwoods names, all these properties are part of what GLCT calls Westwoods.  But I can append a number or string after their identifier to make each of them unique (Westwoods-1, for example).  But we would like them to have some connection to the Westwoods name.  I'll investigate the use of shape files, which I can generate using ArcGIS.  But I'll approach more powerful editing with caution ... I'd guess there's strong protections against ignorance (or stupidity) but there are limits when you get in deep enough.  Again thanks ... your 
help is appreciated.
Mashin (2022-12-05 19:59:41+00:00): @GLCTStewardship
I added the new parcels to the Westwood relation (11544918) that now groups them together.
If you have a parcel-specific names you can add them to the respective polygons.
Also I noticed that you changed some names to a new format e.g. Heilig property (Sep10) - 3126. I am guessing those are some internal reference numbers. If so ideally they would go to a separate fields like e.g.

name = Heilig property
ref = 3126
start_date = 1985-10-10
( I don't know which year that date refers to. this is just an exmaple)
GLCTStewardship (2022-12-06 17:33:13+00:00): Thanks for your help.  Adding all the parcels to the Westwoods relation is exactly what I wanted to do.  I thought I 'd done that when I was editing last, but I'll need to look more closely and figure out what you did and I didn't.  I'll simplify the name and add the additional information (property number and acquisition date) as tags.  That shouldn't be too hard.
mueschel (2022-12-21 11:12:16+00:00): Hi,
please check this building, it got a strange "building:architecture" tag.
Necessarycoot72 (2022-12-29 00:01:06+00:00): Thanks. OSM autofilled the tag to something else.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-02 15:12:01+00:00): why access=no here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/765233808
Braddm (2023-01-03 01:44:12+00:00): Unintentional. Will fix. Thanks
muralito (2022-12-10 00:36:10+00:00): Are you sure this is finished?
There is a video from november showing the construction. https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/vial-ruta-3-general-jos%C3%A9-gervasio-artigas.1366863/page-4
dcskobuffs (2022-12-12 23:02:37+00:00): Hello muralito, thank you for reaching out. I used Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-09-28 that showed the road is open and vehicles are actively moving on it. The video you linked also shows the public driving on the open dual carriageway with no closures apparent despite the roadwork. Are they creating another road that travels along the dual carriageway in this video or is it additional construction of the carriageway? There is also a December video on the site you linked that shows even more completion that also appears to be open to the public.
canfe (2022-12-04 16:57:13+00:00): Nome comune minuscolo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129659324
Sanniu (2023-09-21 08:03:48+00:00): Hi, the newly added path is not connected to the road network and not usable for automatic routing. Can you, please, connect it, where appropriate?
Sanniu (2026-01-04 15:43:44+00:00): gentle ping
NorthCrab (2022-12-02 22:23:50+00:00): Wygląda na to że dodałeś duplikat, na budynku jest już punkt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8945920582/history

Jeśli lokal obejmuje cały budynek to dane oznaczamy na budynku, jeśli nie obejmuje całego budynku albo jest się niepewnym to dane oznaczamy na punkcie. Nigdy! nie oznaczamy obu naraz. Należy punkt w tym przypadku prawdopodobnie usunąć.

Pozdrawiam!
barti7507 (2022-12-02 23:40:50+00:00): Hej,
Dziękuję bardzo za przegląd i konstruktywne uwagi. Ma to sens. Usunę punkt i zmienię przeznaczenie obiektu z pensjonatu na restaurację (z tego co tam bywałem, to lwia część gości korzysta z funkcji restauracyjnej, nie hotelowej)
philippec (2023-11-05 00:51:08+00:00): Lommel politie AED
Is die verplaatst of heb ik verkeerd gemapt ?
Eebie (2023-11-06 19:53:11+00:00): Het gaat om het politiekantoor in Neerpelt. De andere AED staat op een foute plaats, daarom heb ik die van mij toegevoegd op de hoek van het gebouw.
Ik heb ook mijn (slechte en donkere) foto toegevoegd.
Tatfahren (2022-12-04 20:04:50+00:00): Bitte den Description Key (Beschreibung)  nicht für Firmenbewerbung benutzen, siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description?uselang=de .

Ich habe das jetzt gelöscht.
O Bicho Geográfico (2022-12-04 00:40:19+00:00): Certeza que ali é o Rio Sagrado? Ali não é a entrada pra Limeira?
danlessa (2022-12-04 18:01:37+00:00): A informação de que há um povoado chamado "Rio Sagrado" foi repassado por um morador local, e nessa edição fiz uma demarcação aproximada. Há alguma ambiguidade de informações nesta região, a Estrada da Limeira também se é referenciada como sendo a "Estrada das Canavieiras" por alguns moradores e fontes.
O Bicho Geográfico (2022-12-04 21:33:35+00:00): Dê uma olhada um pouco a oeste donde vc demarcou a comunidade. Lá está a comunidade do Rio Sagrado que conheço, inclusive com a Estrada das Canavieiras subindo rumo à Trilha da Ambulância.
danlessa (2022-12-04 22:06:11+00:00): Tens razão, houve um equívoco, vou remover o nome da área
Hufkratzer (2022-12-03 13:50:52+00:00): Hi,
die Reithalle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289210842 war mit building=riding_hall richtig getaggt (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall) und du hast sie mit changeset-Kommentar "Fehlerkorrektur" als leisure_horse_riding umgetaggt; nun hat sie kein building-Tag mehr, ist nicht mehr als Gebäude auf der Karte zu sehen und hat das unpassende horse_riding-Tag, was aber nicht für Reithallen, sondern für komplette Reitanlagen (welche u.a. Reithallen und Reitplätze enthalten können) gedacht ist. In diesem Fall ist horse_riding-Tag bereits am umgebenden Gelände https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144111114 (Reit- und Fahrverein "St. Georg"), nun haben wir wegen deiner "Fehlerkorrektur" also zwei geschachtelte Reitanlagen, was offensichtlich sinnlos ist. Wieso hast du das gemacht? Kannst du das wieder rückgängig machen?
ivanbranco (2022-12-04 14:09:48+00:00): Ciao Preca,

hai cambiato l'area di Cà Vall' Alta da area della fattoria ad area per la vendita al dettaglio. Era voluto?
ivanbranco (2022-12-14 12:11:23+00:00): Ho ripristinato la situazione precedente dato la mancanza di una risposta. Buon mapping
stev (2024-02-26 17:04:20+00:00): This looks like vandalism - there is nothing on the aerial photo. Can you give a good reason why this shouldn't be reverted?
Steve1514 (2024-02-26 19:22:23+00:00): Helló!  It was a family suprise, they bought a tiny bit of land in Scotland, so they got an acknowledgement that they are know land owners there so they asked me to put it on theThey have the proof, and the coordinates If you would like to see. But anyway If you would like, feel free to edit it,since it was a suprise for them Last year.
stev (2024-02-26 21:14:27+00:00): OK, I understand. It's just a bit misleading for anyone walking around expecting a castle! And OSM isn't meant to map temporary/personal things like ownership anyway, so I'll revert.
Dodko (2022-12-03 21:52:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10234571629
Odkiaľ máte názov vrchu Pažica?
Kedysi mal názov Pažiť ale ten bol zrušený.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/zbgis/98/38219?pos=49.003893,20.731856,18
kakiremora (2022-12-03 15:13:12+00:00): Witam,
czy na pewno tagi powinny znajdować się na liniach granic? W edytowanych tutaj granicach tagi są jednocześnie na liniach i na relacjach. W przypadku granic administracyjnych państwowych linie nie zawierają żadnych tagów, a relacje są otagowane. Ponadto nazwa "granica parafii" i podobne są nazwami opisowymi, których powinniśmy w OSM unikać.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Pozdrawiam
eggie (2022-12-03 06:49:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   BAG data hersteld. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
emersonveenstra (2022-12-13 22:55:35+00:00): Road names must not be abbreviated in OSM, could you please fix this? Thanks!
Jojo4u (2022-12-04 11:31:39+00:00): Danke :)
Flambe (2022-12-04 12:39:20+00:00): Bitte :)
michalsochacki (2022-12-03 10:17:58+00:00): Literówka. Miało być "podjazdy".
GinaroZ (2022-12-03 11:39:44+00:00): This is still tagged as a post office though, if it is just a delivery office it should be amenity=post_depot
thx811 (2022-12-03 12:34:54+00:00): Hi GinaroZ, it is open to the public to collect undelivered items and drop of items for sending so I settled on the post office tag, but on looking at amenity=post_depot I would agree that would be more appropriate. I've updated the tag.
Palolo (2022-12-03 21:57:55+00:00): We appreciate your efforts to map Tanzania but ask that you learn how to properly map buildings. Use the q key to make square corners.
Thank you
Palolo (2022-12-03 21:25:22+00:00): Thank you for your efforts to map Tanzania. Please follow the instructions and map buildings accurately.
Frans S (2022-12-19 12:43:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. A few remarks
Please do not add hedges twice when they are combined between 2 fields surrounded by hedges. Just map those just 1 time. 
Also do not connect nodes of highways to other features like hedges. These are errors which need to be solved.
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2022-12-03 06:57:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Wanneer iets heel kort afgesloten is kun je het beter zo laten.
Een note zetten we dan op het wegdeel.
Duurt het iets langer dan zetten we de weg op access:conditional= no @ (tijdspad)  
Bv access:conditional=no @ (2021 Jan 20-2021 Apr 3) 

Duurt het vele maanden dan highway=construction 
Nu heb je iets gedaan met afslagbeperkingen.  Dat is niet de bedoeling. Dat heeft niemand in de gaten en blijft dan vele maanden actief en onrouteerbaar. 
Hoelang gaat dit duren?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-03 07:11:04+00:00): reverted by changeset #129667335

Je edits zijn teruggezet.. 

Wordt niet een deel van de Churchillweg een fietsstraat ?   .... dan aan dat deel toevoegen 
cyclestreet=yes
traffic_sign=NL:L51

https://wageningen.fietsersbond.nl/dossiers/snelle-fietsroute-wageningen-ede/

en hoe te mappen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cyclestreet

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-03 07:23:36+00:00): note geplaatst https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3465190#map=16/51.9717/5.6739&layers=N
Palolo (2022-12-03 19:06:06+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to OSM. Please look over the instructions to learn how to make square corners on the buildings.
maraf24 (2022-12-03 11:02:42+00:00): Błędne zmiany w adresach.
sejmann (2022-12-03 01:17:44+00:00): my first attempt to edit openstreetmap.  Amazon keeps mis-delivering to this new house, perhaps because it wasn't in osm yet. Bing doesn't yet have a recent enough satellite image, but google maps does.
Mashin (2022-12-04 17:37:05+00:00): Thanks.
I don't know how often Amazon updates their routing maps from OSM data, but they should get it sooner or later.
Austrianton (2022-12-03 16:33:03+00:00): Please keep your single change-sets local, to avoid spamming the history feed over large areas. In this case it might have been better to split the edit in Germany into a separate change-set.

That being said; happy future mapping and best regards.
Kovoschiz (2022-12-03 17:39:39+00:00): @Austrianton This won't do anything to Organic Maps / Maps.me uploaders. Better follow up on their Git issues to limit changeset extent.
Austrianton (2022-12-03 21:23:08+00:00): I must have overlooked, that the uploader was done by organic maps. Thanks for pointing that out.
Frans S (2023-01-30 17:38:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please use the correct tag for roads in rural areas. The tag :residential is only to be used in urban areas like villages and town. Since it is a through road, unclassified is a better tag.
Best regards and keep mapping
bxl-forever (2022-12-03 10:48:13+00:00): Hi there!

I see you are citing the peeringdb.com website as reference for your changes.

May I kindly remind you that OSM contributors are reminded never to add data from any copyrighted sources.

The website you are using is very clear about this:

https://www.peeringdb.com/aup
"Except for Internet operational purposes approved by PeeringDB, no part of the PeeringDB data may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of PeeringDB on behalf of the copyright holders. Any use of this material to target advertising or similar activities is explicitly forbidden and will be prosecuted. PeeringDB requests to be notified of any such activities or suspicions thereof. The PeeringDB data may not be passed on in bulk to any other person or organization unless approved by PeeringDB."

It is not allowed to take any data from PeeringDB and use it into OpenStreetMap.  I suggest you remove any information you may have copied from them.

Have a nice day.
bxl-forever (2022-12-03 10:54:01+00:00): I had a look at the details of some of your changes.

Adding the "source:website" tag might only be relevant if that website had actually been used to obtain the data put into the OSM database.  In reality, our data was here before you added that source.  Your contributions are complete nonsense, they only serve to put OSM in legal trouble!

I suggest you review all your previous edits one by one and remove the dubious links.
ImpendingEclipse (2022-12-03 11:20:42+00:00): Dear bxl-forever,

thank you for your message, although I feel a little irritated by your tone ("complete nonsense" etc). I have already removed the three links that I added yesterday. Still I would like to clarify that I did not intend to break any of their or your rules. Also, I had not copied any content from PeeringDB to OSM. In my understanding a link is something different than copying data points. But I also understand that OSM is afraid of misunderstandings w.r.t where the content came from. By the way, at least one of the buildings on OSM that I edited had already links to operator websites. Have you inquired with them whether they approve their published information to be copied? Best regards
VLD304 (2022-12-05 21:02:28+00:00): Hello U R Family Practice!
I noticed you've created a healthcare feature with detailed tagging in the middle of the ocean, off the coast of Africa, which seems to be meant for a location in Sydney, Australia. Was this by mistake or intended? Please feel free to reach out to me to discuss this further. Thank you so much!
gscholz (2022-12-16 10:44:38+00:00): Hi Henblo,
this changeset has (at least) destroyed the boundary relation of "Mutatá":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-76.51302&lat=7.44362&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129664550

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2182325/history#map=11/7.3443/-76.4319

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Nakaner (2022-12-05 13:05:44+00:00): Hi,

this and a couple of other changesets look very much like a mechanical edit. Where and when did you discuss this edit according to the Automated Edits Code of Conduct?

Please mind, blindly adding wikidata and brand tags to shops without manual survey does not improve OSM. It is a mechanical edit if you open iD, let it "resolve" all reported QA issues and upload the result.

Best regards

Michale
ivanbranco (2022-12-03 12:50:12+00:00): Hi Diogo, 

are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
ivanbranco (2022-12-03 12:55:46+00:00): I also noticed you added hundreds of shops in several malls in a couple of hours. What's the source of that data?
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-12-03 16:37:45+00:00): Hello, as you noticed by my stats I’m a experienced editor, I’ve added a good number of stores in malls in my country Portugal because there was a lot of malls with no shops, the source is based on my knowledge and on the information in the internet, more specifically on the malls official websites.
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-12-03 16:41:15+00:00): About the automated edit, it was not an automated edit, it is related to the recent update of new brands to NSI, I had just uploaded the stores related to that data via a really specific overpass on JOSM, all the edited stores had verification.
ivanbranco (2022-12-03 16:54:54+00:00): You don't think this edit applies for the automated edits guidelines? I mean, if this would possible, we could just run a NSI bot (that wouldn't fix other problems as well, here I saw Douglas with a website not updated since 2017, another one with the main website [should be brand:website] instead of the shop one ecc.ecc. that could be fixed by a local user).

About the mall, internet websites have rights, you literally added all the shops of 15 different malls. I opened a random one (Forum Barreiro) and the bottom page says "2022 FORUM BARREIRO. Todos os direitos reservados". I could be wrong tho, I visited a Krakow mall 4-5 times by now and I didn't added/updated all shops yet, if this is possible it would make me things easier for sure.
ivanbranco (2022-12-03 16:57:21+00:00): "it is related to the recent update of new brands to NSI"

Which one? I looked in the NSI Github and I only found this topic (https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/7460) that requested the adding of Portugal for Douglas check, but here you updated other countries as well, such as Italy.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-12-03 12:25:03+00:00): Merci! Par contre attention à l'alignement de Bing qui doit être 0.6,-1.54
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-12-03 12:38:39+00:00): Thanks! Be careful though to add the Bing offset as follow: 0.6,-1.54
clay_c (2023-06-28 17:11:12+00:00): Hi jrm2020,

Has the Purchase Parkway been fully signed as Interstate 69 now? Or does this segment still have "Future I-69" signs? I couldn't find any news articles online saying that the extension was complete.
clay_c (2023-08-28 20:50:24+00:00): Hi again. I haven't seen a response from you, so I went ahead and removed ref="I 69" from the roadway. Much of the roadway was already tagged with noref=yes and fut_ref="I 69", so in the future, once this highway finally gets the Interstate designation, make sure to remove those tags as well.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140512648
Minh Nguyen (2023-10-18 04:14:02+00:00): This also removed “name=Purchase Parkway” from many but not all of the ways, resulting in haphazard rendering in the OSM Americana style.