piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
streckenkundler (2022-06-07 17:12:12+00:00): Alle Wege die ich bearbeitet habe und östlich der Linie Halbe - Rietzneuendorf kenne ich persönlich seit ewigen Zeiten,  die spreewaldnahen bessser, die anderen durch gelegentliche Besuche. Bei den beiden Wegen nördlich Dornswalde bin ich auch schon mal rumgegurkt. Ich sehe hier per Definiton im Wiki und aufgrund meines lokalen Wissens an keiner Stelle etwas, was ein mtb:scale>0 rechtfertigen könnte. Wenn man da mit einem ganz normalen Trecking-Rad ohne Probleme fahren kann, ist man meiner Meinung nach nicht im Schwierigkeitsbereich, was ein mtb:scale>0 rechtfertigen könnte. Sicher mag mtb:scale=0 auch eine Aussage sein. Aber dann kommen wir dahin alles explizit zu taggen... Es ist ohnehin schon schwierig, alles andere, was man hinreichend als Standard-Keys betrachten könnte, einigermaßen aktuell zu halten. (...was bei einer Änderung dann natürlich wiederum Einfluß auf mtb:scale hätte)

Andere, im meinen Augen äußerst problematische mtb:scale-Erfassungen habe im Forum bereits aufgezeigt. Abgesehen davon, daß bei diesen schnellen Auswertung auch wieder Wege dabei sind die mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit lange vollständig gesperrt sind, glaube ich allen Erfassungen von mtb:scale>1 von befahrbaren Wegen für den Bereich Südbrandenburg nicht. Nicht nach der Definition im Wiki sowie den darin enthaltenen Bildbeispielen.

Sven
user_5359 (2022-06-06 12:58:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066791734. You change the sequence of key and value.
MyFudalli (2022-06-04 21:16:36+00:00): Sorry, i have set 500 km/h for the speed limit, i fixed it
jidanni (2024-03-14 05:14:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148621033 in fact shows more pieces of this abandoned rail line that you might want to extend.
bxl-forever (2022-06-05 16:44:54+00:00): Hello,

It would probably make more sense to set layer=1 on railway features and leave the small road at level 0.

I always feel uncomfortable when people put "tunnel" tags to objects that are not really tunnels, e.g. it makes it impossible to query the OSM database and get the number of kilometers of tunnels we have in the city.

Technically, it is a normal road going across the railway "hill", while the railway line is really on another level, exactly like when the railway is on a bridge.

What do you think?
Trevor_1 (2022-06-04 21:54:01+00:00): *deleted depreciated and redundant tags
Danchev (2022-06-08 23:17:36+00:00): Hi Rps333,

why have you changed the school name to ALL UPPERCASE?
Rps333 (2022-06-09 10:37:54+00:00): I was fixing a note and copied the name from the link provided. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3210066
I have fixed it.

Cheers
Danchev (2022-06-10 10:38:28+00:00): Thank you very much!
mcliquid (2022-06-07 07:33:26+00:00): Hi Jan, in this changeset you connected the B311 with the "Käferpark" track/piste above it and added two violent "zig-zags". Could you please have another look at your changes? Thanks a lot!
mcliquid (2022-06-07 07:36:45+00:00): In addition, the course is now completely different than shown in basemap.at
Where do you get your source from?
mcliquid (2022-06-07 07:45:51+00:00): History link: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1j5O
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121955675
mcliquid (2022-06-07 09:18:10+00:00): Thanks for your correction here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122061353
woodpeck_repair (2022-06-07 19:50:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122087527 where the changeset comment is: revert edits made based on google maps
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-04 23:24:12+00:00): Please, use changeset comments ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments )
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-05 12:48:52+00:00): En Venezuela usamos el prefijo "Calle" antes del nombre 👍🏼
risturiz (2022-06-05 14:35:53+00:00): Omg la borré y no la volví a colocar? xD ... Ciertamente... Gracias Wilmer, tamaño error de mi parte ( eso me pasa por usar ID )
whatmeinfallible (2022-08-02 20:23:46+00:00): Hello,
I noticed that, in this changeset, you made mass modifications to the names on a motorway that spans Greece. It seems you have uploaded multiple changesets with mass modifications to names on motorways, including removing name tags. Here are two more changesets with mass modifications to names:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121956820
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122045330
Can you explain why you changed these names?
Thank you. I look forward to working with you.
CurlingMan13 (2022-06-05 10:25:12+00:00): Reviewed.  Looks good to me!

Welcome to OSM!
CurlingMan13 (2022-06-05 10:24:32+00:00): Reviewed.  Looks good.  Only question I have is where you got the names of the trail(s)?

Other than that, it all looks in order.  Welcome to OSM!  One of the easiest ways to get involved, especially just adding trail names and other details is with an app called StreetComplete.  It is super easy to use.  Heck, even I use it still since it is so well designed.

Feel free to message me if you have any questions or want me to take a look at any edits.  I'll see you around!
Mashin (2022-06-06 09:42:32+00:00): I would just add that you don't need to add the trail names, because they are already included on the hiking trail relations. e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11269400
ivanbranco (2022-06-05 08:13:35+00:00): Hi Chuppyy,

is this ATM really called "Chupy Pay"?
It's kinda similar to you actual nickname, and identical to your previous account nickname (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Chupy).
ovruni (2022-06-05 05:28:38+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado como website un enlace a wikipedia_commons, la etiqueta de website esta destinada a colocar el sitio de la institución en caso la tuviese.
Saludos
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:16:23+00:00): entiendo
tealcattail (2022-06-05 02:37:53+00:00): shapes were weird so i did another walk, should be much better now. please disregard review requested.
CurlingMan13 (2022-06-05 10:30:45+00:00): Roger that!

Welcome to OSM!  I see you use StreetComplete as you become familiar with OSM, and dabble with ID.  StreetComplete is a wonderful tool.  There are always new things to add, more details to uncover, US flags to be added, and businesses to be listed.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or want me to take a look at any of your edits.  I would be happy to (I don't usually monitor the review request tags).  I'll see you around on OSM!
Udarian (2022-06-05 02:50:54+00:00): also added and updated tennis courts and used building parts to add the shape of a more complex roof, this is my first time doing that so it may not be 100% optimally done
user_8655426 (2022-06-06 09:45:35+00:00): Hello,
You have added some roads under construction in this changeset, but those roads are not shown in the aerial image. 
You are editing roads all over Japan, but I don't think you are doing a field survey.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Yueying-8520/history

Please explain to "us" in this Changeset Discussions how you are collecting information on Japanese roads. (us = Japanese mappers)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121958052
user_8655426 (2022-06-17 09:46:03+00:00): Unfortunately, you're ignoring messages from other users and continuing to edit.
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15661662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Yueying-8520/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062244879/history

Please imagine your future after reading the following pages.

Data working group
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

Ban Policy
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Ban_Policy

Legal FAQ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ

We will wait for your reply for a few more days.
We are watching you!
user_8655426 (2022-06-27 11:57:53+00:00): 你好，
您已在此变更集中添加了一些正在建设中的道路，但这些道路未显示在航拍图像中。
您正在日本各地编辑此类道路，但我认为您不是在进行实地调查。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Yueying-8520/history

请在此变更集讨论中向日本地图绘制者解释您如何收集有关日本道路的信息。
user_15661662 (2022-07-20 13:12:49+00:00): "but those roads are not shown in the aerial image." Is this really? It looks like these are probably shown on GSI's aerial map, or am I seen wrong?
user_8655426 (2022-07-20 13:19:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972221179
user_8655426 (2022-07-24 09:31:57+00:00): Hi,
You have already changed the roads in this area.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122603528
https://osmcha.org/changesets/122603528/

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972221179
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066837997
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066837998

The road you mentioned is currently under construction.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008274293
Don't you remember what you did?
Please check the aerial image.
ovruni (2022-06-05 05:30:48+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado un pueblo place=town donde solo hay algunas casas. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dtown
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:15:34+00:00): ok
Warin61 (2023-02-01 03:46:39+00:00): Hi,

The DCS Base Map (should be available with your editor) has the present day boundaries ... they include the boundary for the road... take a look.
NebSgird (2022-06-05 03:27:45+00:00): *part 4
AnonymousAlligator (2022-06-05 03:45:40+00:00): ...This is not part of the import, just forgot to change the comment. Oops. Sorry.
Udarian (2022-06-05 04:57:52+00:00): also updated shape of a building and other surrounding structures
mueschel (2022-06-18 16:58:02+00:00): Hi,
you added a huge amount of text to the camping places you edited. Please note that this not what OSM is meant for - extended information should be put e.g. on an external web page, linked in an website or url tag.
Gabriel Wicke (2022-06-18 18:30:46+00:00): @mueschel, I linked the external website(s) too. However, kayakers and other small human powered boats do not always have an internet connection (due to lack of coverage, or power constraints), and information especially about landing conditions at campsites can be safety critical when adjusting plans on the water in emergencies. Having a small amount of text in OSM is fairly cheap storage wise (compresses well), is readily distributed through apps like OSMAnd, and provides a great safety benefit for such offline users.
SaldañaFord (2022-06-05 04:10:58+00:00): Realiniemtos de vias
ovruni (2022-06-05 05:33:54+00:00): Hola, en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios han agregado objetos indicando que se ha utilizado la imagen de Esri aclarada, desde la cual no se divisan varios de estos objetos, lo cual no permite la verificabilidad. [0] Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla en el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad peruana. 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
abakus_uploader (2022-06-05 22:43:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Udarian (2022-06-05 05:02:55+00:00): updated the roof:shape of multiple buildings, some of them were a bit more complex so I had to make them into Multipolygon's. also added/updated sidewalks and crossings surrounding Normandy Isle Park & Pool. also updated addresses
Jakka (2022-06-06 06:41:53+00:00): vous changer track en cycleway ?
Il y a des panneaux de signalisation ? Qui indique que c'est seulement pour vélo ?
Jakka (2022-06-06 06:45:51+00:00): vous upgrade track vers unclassified possible.... vous ouvrez la route pour tout le trafic
Mais surface reste ground ? smootness bad? track grade 3 ?
jpbbihin (2022-06-07 05:05:51+00:00): Hello, The surface has been renewed there. If you want, I can check again and send you some photos. regards. JP
Jakka (2022-06-07 05:28:33+00:00): No need to sent photo, only correct the tagging of this highway like it is .
thx for updating osm
map per (2023-04-29 20:59:16+00:00): Hallo Bratananio,

hier war die Hausnummer 6 nur an der gelöschten Bäckerei eingetragen. Hab die Hausnummer wieder hergestellt.

Viele Grüße
map per
Bratananio (2023-04-30 07:08:59+00:00): Vielen Dank dafür.
Gruß
B.
jimkats (2022-07-01 16:35:05+00:00): Hi, how was the relation broken with the "inner" ways? It worked find so far in any apps I used.
gscholz (2022-07-02 05:53:03+00:00): Hi jimkats,
as fas I remember the  inner areas were overplapping in a not OSM compliant way and only depicting the castle walls as the castle itself.
By far the best tool to find broken relation is OSM Inspector:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=23.29533&lat=37.30750&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The "Areas" view shows different relation errrors and if you are mainly working in Greece the view cited above will be a start to remove further errors there.
Kind Regards
Guido
gscscnd (2022-06-07 06:31:45+00:00): Czy tych trzech relacji nie należałoby połączyć?
majster_pepek (2022-06-07 06:50:34+00:00): Napisałem do ciebie DM.
IIVQ (2022-08-16 21:39:50+00:00): Please, don't ever split up ways like this to make a turn lane!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn explains the correct way.
IIVQ (2022-08-16 21:41:36+00:00): Also, if you split a way like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066852164, don't forget to add oneway=yes-tags. Now my navigation will steer me left of the centre median!
user_2066394 (2022-06-07 20:30:01+00:00): Und dann bicycle=no ?
user_5359 (2022-06-06 12:56:48+00:00): Hello again! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066854516. You didn‘t answered my question about the meaning of the key, but PLEASE correct your typo‘s.

Use also the key phone instead „phone No“ and use the international writing.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
canfe (2022-06-06 12:24:03+00:00): In base alla wiki non penso proprio che debba essere cambiato in footway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121962670
eggie (2022-06-05 08:42:14+00:00): Hoi AvdK,
Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me allemaal oke zo. Gebouwen probeer ik meestal los te houden van de landuse. 
Wanneer je doorzet.. en daar lijkt het wel op...  dan zou je kunnen overstappen naar de betere editor JOSM.
Je hebt dan ook veel meer mogelijkheden ook in achtergronden zolas de BGT omtrekgericht. Dan zie je precies hoe zo'n 'pier' loopt.
Als voorbeeld zal ik je pier aanpassen aan de BGT als vlak. 
(Het rendert als vlak straks. )
Je zult toch niet aan JOSM kunnen ontkomen. Bv routerelaties kun je aalleen met die editor bewerken. ID geeft schade. 
Hier wat leesvoer. 

editor josm stap voor stap .. een aanrader. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 

BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

of zoals altijd.. meer wegen naar Rome.. 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 

MVG
eggie
AvdK_Hiker (2022-06-06 18:58:03+00:00): Dank je wel voor de feedback.
Ik had ergens gehoopt JOSM voorlopig nog te mijden, maar als ik er toch niet aan ontkom, dan ga ik er maar mee aan de slag.
Dank je voor de links om met JOSM te starten...
AkuAnakTimur (2023-04-25 20:22:28+00:00): Hi! How come https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7193785111 is "Dengkil Timur" when https://kartaview.org/details/2120978/5208/track-info suggests something else?

Here's another image from Mapillary
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=218392059801783
AkuAnakTimur (2023-04-25 20:23:44+00:00): Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6478490361/ - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=135024521992033
darkonus (2023-04-04 10:29:56+00:00): Тут ви правильну назву садочка: «Ясла-садок №35 "Горобинка"»виправили на неправильну. Скорочену назву на кшталт «ДНЗ», «ЗДО» треба додавати в short_name
Вальдимар (2023-04-05 11:44:06+00:00): https://ck.isuo.org/preschools/view/id/45622
darkonus (2023-04-05 12:29:21+00:00): За посиланням у назві ЗДО а не ДНЗ. Але самі ці абревіатури неінформативні бо не дають інформації тому хто не знає як вона розшифровується. Ясла-садок, дитсадок зрозуміліше ніж ДНЗ чи ЗДО
Вальдимар (2023-04-05 12:45:30+00:00): Це офіційна назва комунальної/державної/офіційної установи. Якщо абревіатура не подобається - подайте повну назву згідно з ІСУО
darkonus (2023-04-05 17:31:20+00:00): Зробив так:

Повна назва з ІСУО в official_name = Заклад дошкільної освіти комбінованого типу ясла-садок №35 «Горобинка»

Скорочена назва short_name = ЗДО ясла-садок №35 «Горобинка»

Звичайна назва, name = Ясла-садок №35 «Горобинка»

В name зробив ситуативне скорочення як рекомендується на вікі-сторінці UK:Назви
stosh77 (2022-09-27 05:34:01+00:00): 道路、東北通の真ん中にPOIがありますが、小学校の敷地内のものでしょうか？
もしくは、「tourism=artwork」になっていますが、パブリックアートではなく、名前からして、小学校の入り口で間違えて入力されたものでしょうか？
user_17724595 (2022-12-13 22:58:37+00:00): Hello from America.  Judging by this user's other edits, I doubt it exists.

アメリカからこんにちは。 このユーザーの他の編集から判断すると、その存在は疑わしい.
stosh77 (2023-01-05 01:15:30+00:00): Thanks for the reply! Oh from the USA!
I will remove it as it does not exist.
Thanks.
Aleks-Berlin (2022-06-10 18:32:44+00:00): Hi Hartmut,
please check again
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066864272
I found it in here:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys#problem
Thanks, Alex
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2022-06-10 19:25:17+00:00): Thx,  fixed
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-06-11 04:10:15+00:00): 朋友你好，桥梁名称应加在man_made=bridge的区域上而非道路名称上，道路应该填写道路的名称。
欢迎加群（t.me/osmchina）联系或者私信我之类，都是非常欢迎的。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121964656
Seva-snz (2022-08-02 21:04:30+00:00): Что, серьёзно, место для дома на колёсах посреди такого уклона?) туда даже пешком тяжело подняться)
возможно "viewpoint" имелся в виду, но тогда тут посреди гор полно таких вьюпоинтов будет..
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-07 07:05:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9794703961 - is it really on crossing and interupting all 4 paths?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-07 07:06:45+00:00): In case of fixing or actually existing - please close also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3214124

And thank you so much for mapping! But this one looks like a mistake to me.
user_2066394 (2022-06-11 15:26:04+00:00): leisure=Therme
braucht vermutlich auch nochmal anderes Tagging
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-06-27 14:41:15+00:00): Hey Thibault,

Vanwaar de aanpassing van "highway=unclassified" naar "highway=path"? Dat is een serieuze degradering van het wegtype, wat ook implicaties heeft voor hoe een routeplanner dit interpreteert.

Daarnaast mag er hier gemotoriseerd bestemmingsverkeer rijden...
Thibault Rommel (2022-06-27 17:59:54+00:00): Hallo

De aansluiting van de R30 naar de Vaartdijkstraat werd heraangelegd. In tegenstelling tot wat je nog op StreetView ziet, kunnen enkel fietsers en bromfietsers hier de straat uitrijden om het fietspad langs de R30 te volgen. Aan het andere uiteinde van de weg staan paaltjes, ik neem aan dat daar ook geen auto's e.d. langs kunnen. Gezien de weg verderop zelfs als fietspad ingetekend staat, lijkt het mij niet zo zot om dit dan ook als pad te zien.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-06-27 20:58:54+00:00): Hey Thibault,

(Eerst en vooral: om verwarring te vermijden: ik heb het over de vaartdijkstraat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688509384, niet over de connectie naar de bargeweg toe)

Ik snap de neiging om er een 'path' van te maken, doch:

- Voor hulpdiensten is het best wel relevant dat dit 'bereidbaar' is indien het moet
- 'path' op zich is bijzonder ambigu. Dit kan gaan van een klein bospaadje tot een voormalig jaagpad. Zonder 'width' is er niet zoveel uit af te leiden. In sommige gevallen opteer ik dan liever voor "highway=footway; bicycle=no/yes/designated" of "highway=pedestrian; bicycle=*", wat IMHO een veel beter beeld geeft.

 En ja, iD "corrigeert" dit automatisch (maar daar ben ik geen fan van)...

Ik ben er zelf gisteren nog gepasseerd én heb mapillary* geschoten - al heb ik énkel de achterkant van de verkeersborden van de vaartdijkstraat, maar ik denk dat die niet gewijzigd zijn.

(*: Ik kan die beelden al zien, maar ze zijn nog niet gepublished...)

Mvg,
Pieter
Thibault Rommel (2022-06-27 21:13:35+00:00): Over welke borden heb je het dan?
Als de situatie die de signalisatie op deze foto impliceert nog actueel is, dan is er langs beide kanten geen doorgang meer voor voertuigen om de Vaartdijkstraat te bereiken. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=511776260125256

In het noorden zit je vast door Jersey blokken tussen het fietspad en de rijweg, en in het zuiden staan er paaltjes en/of een C5.

Hopelijk brengen je nieuwe Mapillary beelden meer duidelijkheid.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-06-27 21:23:27+00:00): Aha, dat verkeersbord had ik over het hoofd gezien, en die jerseyblokken ook...

Ik heb 'motor_vehicle' op 'no' gezet, maar ik blijf bij mijn standpunt dat 'highway=unclassified' beter blijft om de geest van de weg te vatten (al zou highway=pedestrian m.i. ook toepasselijk zijn).

Voor hulpdiensten blijft de wegclassificatie echter belangrijk, ze weten dan bv. dat ze door een paaltje te verwijderen op de bypass er wel heen kunnen.

Mvg,
Pieter
eggie (2022-07-04 15:08:29+00:00): Dag wvdp 

Alleen natural=landuse is niet voldoende.
Ik heb de specificatie wetland=reedbed toegevoegd zodat het weer naar behoren rendert.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-04 15:27:18+00:00): typo  alleen natural=wetland is niet voldoende. Je krijgt dan geen juiste rendering.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
user_2066394 (2022-06-06 11:50:48+00:00): Macht das Teilstück für die Fahrradnaivigation da überhaupt Sinn?
citro (2022-06-06 12:21:59+00:00): Ich weiß auch nicht, es hat jemand anderes angelegt. Sollte man es löschen ?
user_2066394 (2022-06-06 12:35:14+00:00): Man könnte es nach Luftbild umarbeiten in eine Zufahrt.
citro (2022-06-06 12:55:14+00:00): Gut, mache ich heute Abend, bin gerade nur am Handy
kubahahaha (2022-10-25 13:08:26+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych nazw?
kubahahaha (2022-11-04 11:43:43+00:00): Changeset wycofany w całości, fałszywe dane.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128479524
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.