piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Luzandro (2020-07-21 04:07:43+00:00): Nein, keine Sorge - liegt nicht an deiner Änderung. Der Weg, den du bearbeitet hast, ist Teil der Radrouten-Relation "Loiblweg". Diese enthält neben den zugehörigen Wegabschnitten auch noch einige Nodes mit Wegweisern, bei denen keine Rolle "guidepost" angegeben war (wobei sowieso nur eine für Nodes definiert ist)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route=bicycle#Mitglieder_der_Relation
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88265541
pingg (2020-07-21 18:34:22+00:00): Super, danke für die Info! :-)
syntex (2023-08-28 09:55:25+00:00): W Olsztynku dodałeś nieistniejące drogi w tym zestawie zmian. Zmieniłem je na proposed, nie ma ich śladu na ortofoto
Piotr Strębski (2023-09-03 10:39:52+00:00): Dziękuję!
user_5359 (2020-07-21 07:06:16+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Whn. What is the meaning of the key 8?
mueschel (2020-07-22 14:43:19+00:00): Could you also check this POI, it got some strange tag as well:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7732313434
user_5359 (2020-07-21 06:50:28+00:00): Hello! Did you mean building:part instead building_part?
AndersAndersson (2020-07-21 20:56:57+00:00): Hej!
Jag gjorde om Vikingaskolans byggnad till en multipolygon. Du har tänkt delvis rätt, men själva multipolygonen ska finnas i en relation, inte på själva vägen.
literan (2020-07-21 19:15:41+00:00): пожалуйста, не надо расставлять теги bicycle=yes, foot=yes и т.п. на дороги. Почему - описано в моем профиле.
taketaketake (2020-08-18 01:38:05+00:00): It would be a problem if you could edit without feeling the information source.
This is vandalism
taketaketake (2020-08-18 05:48:07+00:00): 私はこれに従って編集しています。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging
個人的な判断で編集する行為は止めて頂きたい
Jeffrey Friedl (2020-08-19 06:36:10+00:00): 「上賀茂山端線」はみっちゃ細い、小さい道。「Secondary Road」はありえない。「Secondary Road」とするはアブナイです。
Jeffrey Friedl (2020-08-19 06:43:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging はオススメだけです。実際に違うの方がいい場合もあります。
taketaketake (2020-08-19 07:50:49+00:00): では管理区分は無視するというのですか？
OSM独自の編集をすれば良いと言うことですか？
たしかに実情と管理区分は違う場合は多々ありますが、それでは整合が取れなくなり、ただの個人の地図になってしまいます。
車線数、道路幅で区分するべきでは？
Jeffrey Friedl (2020-08-19 08:59:54+00:00): OpenStreetMapの説明により、「Secondary Road」は「A highway which is not part of a major route, but nevertheless forming a link in the national route network. In developed countries it normally has 2 lanes and the traffic for both directions is usually separated by a central line on the road.」と書いています。　[ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=secondary ]

日本では、府県道はダイタイ「Secondary Road」になるなので、府県道のオススメは「Secondary Road」です。けれども、違う場合もあります。それはポイント。違う場合もあります。
user_8334278 (2020-07-20 22:30:19+00:00): resolved outdated tags
Rogoyski (2020-11-08 18:50:13+00:00): Zwróć uwagę, że jeśli na dwóch sąsiednich działkach dajesz landuse=residential + barrier=fence, to oznaczasz, że na granicy między nimi są dwa płoty. To jest błąd.
syntex (2020-11-08 19:29:29+00:00): Tak, już mi zwrócono na to uwagę jakiś czas temu w innym zestawie zmian w tym miejscu, jeszcze tego nie poprawiłem. Natomiast w nowych zestawach zmian jest już poprawnie.
syntex (2020-11-08 19:55:59+00:00): Ok, poprawiłem wszystkie dublujące się płoty w tej okolicy
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-10-02 20:05:35+00:00): Não se coloca nomes genérico como apenas "Retorno" na via,  retirei e tbm diminui o nivel da Ecovia norte onde não é pavimentada.
brainwad (2020-07-27 12:58:35+00:00): I'm not sure this is right. See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.350975000000005&lng=8.520177777777803&z=17&pKey=F7DwYLusmZiLNoVCfmaWEQ&x=0.24543601761529255&y=0.5714318804435264&zoom=2.6463654223968565&focus=photo. It's a little hard to make out in this photo, but you can see there is an island of grass with an apparently immovable pole right in the middle and a bollard behind it, that the path splits around. Each half of the path on either side is too narrow to be used by multi-track vehicles. I have been there myself by bike many times.
sovereign_ch (2020-07-27 22:42:00+00:00): Jetzt kommen wir zu Details, die ein Expat wohl nicht kennt. Ich kenne die Brücke bestens. Sie diente bis 1987 insbesondere der Truppenüberfuhr zwischen den Waffenplätzen Allmend I und III. Wäre es nach der Stadt gegangen, wäre die Brücke nach 2005 entfernt worden, ein Rekurs des Heimatschutzes hat sie (vorerst – bis heute) davor bewahrt. In der gesamten Allmend herrscht grundsätzlich "Motorfahrzeugverbot", aber Polizei, Feuerwehr, Sanität, Unterhalt (TAZ, ERZ et al) dürfen dies (wo möglich) ignorieren.

Die etwa 115-jährige Brücke steht jetzt weiterhin, und das unerwünschte und unbefugte Befahren wurde mittels "non-removable bollards" wirksam unterbunden. Dies sollte man zwingend genau nur so taggen. OTOH könnte man im Notfall nämlich die Poller entfernen (drücken, ziehen, Flex auspacken). Das macht aus der alten Waffenplatzzufahrt aber weiterhin keinen designieren oder undefinierten Fuss-/Radweg. Man hat nur physisch verhindert, dass ein zweispuriges Fahrzeug, welches dort gemäss Signalisation eh nichts verloren hat, auf die Brücke kommt. Das kann man mit einem Fingerschnipp ändern, falls die Stadt dies ändern möchte (will sie nicht, Punkt). Aber mit über 3500 mm Durchfahrbreite ist dies physisch garantiert kein "path", sondern minimal "track".

And please ask if you need a non-automated translation for any ill-translated specifics.

Liebe Gruess, S.
brainwad (2020-07-28 10:14:19+00:00): Thanks for the history lesson - I had no idea Allmend used to be a military area :)

Honestly, it seems to me all 3 tags are deficient. "track" is defined as roads built for for agricultural/forestry/etc., which this isn't really. "service" is defined as roads proving access to a specific place, which this doesn't (if it were signed "Zubringerdienst gestattet" then service would be much more acceptable). "path" is defined as being for non-motorised vehicles, which applies to the current use of this bridge, but not to the construction standard (I hadn't considered this before, because I didn't realise it was constructed to a high standard).

I think "track" is the most easy to defend: this bridge, and the roads through Allmend, are very much like Waldstrasse or Wirtschaftsweg, despite now only being used for leisure, and it reflects that it was originally constructed with capacity for heavy vehicles. Otherwise I would use "path" with "width=3.5", but this doesn't capture the construction character properly. I think "service" is least good.

Sorry for the long comment, and sorry about the English: reading German is ok, with the help of a dictionary; writing coherent German is still a struggle.
user_5359 (2020-07-21 04:45:51+00:00): Hello! The tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level. If you want to indicate that your shop is located on the ground floor, the tag level=0 is the correct tag (see https://www.osm.org/way/492456545).
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-07-29 17:36:12+00:00): Conform legii nr.764 din 27.12.2001 (https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=101662) în ultima sa redacție și anume a anexei nr.2 din legea dată, sectorul dat se numește „Rîșcani” și nu „Râșcani”. Înainte să editezi ceva, mai consultă vreo sursă oficială.
Vezi: https://ibb.co/ph8HgFF
user_5359 (2020-07-21 04:44:00+00:00): Hello! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
ivanbranco (2022-01-06 10:28:18+00:00): Hi NFZANMNIM,

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eQz

you added some place=neighborhood instead of place=neighbourhood here, can you fix it?
Jose Luis Infante (2020-07-21 09:05:46+00:00): Hola,
por favor, ¿puedes justificar el borrado masivo que has realizado? Aunque una zona o unos caminos sean privados, eso no significa que haya que borrarlos. Se puede añadir información indicando que el acceso está restringido.
De momento revertiré los cambios realizados porque claramente has borrado elementos que existen en la realidad.
Un saludo!
camelCaseNick (2020-08-03 01:58:03+00:00): Hey,

for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12698692 I couldn't find a Wikidata entry for Hung Van Chu for the name:etymology:wikidata. Could you look into it and find the correct item (or just use name:etymology)?

CamelCaseNick
Minh Nguyen (2020-08-05 15:53:45+00:00): He’s a local community activist. I was having some difficulty finding any verifiable published sources that establish his notability for inclusion in Wikidata, but I’ll keep looking.
Minh Nguyen (2020-08-05 15:54:27+00:00): Oh I see, looks like autocomplete got me again. I’ll fix that.
Minh Nguyen (2020-08-05 16:00:28+00:00): Fixed in changeset 88991079.
Nan Htet Win (2020-07-21 03:49:15+00:00): Patheingyi, Min Kan, Myanmar (Burma)
Supaplex (2021-04-16 09:16:23+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
Supaplex (2021-04-16 09:19:12+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
user_8334278 (2020-07-21 03:55:43+00:00): this is not a highway bus stop
Reeniz (2020-07-21 04:06:23+00:00): Hola, tenga cuidado al importar sus trazas yaque no elimino las elevaciones del gps ni agrego los tag correspondientes. Saludos
mueschel (2020-07-22 08:19:04+00:00): Hi,
you added the key "landuse1" and "leisure1" to many objects - this key is not used in any other place. It's not possible to have two landuse or two leisure tags on one object. 
Please check your edits and fix the tagging.


Jan
Supaplex (2020-07-21 14:42:54+00:00): 應該整塊都是吧
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6943302#map=19/25.08318/121.54485
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88273589
catdreamer (2020-07-22 13:35:52+00:00): 外掛程式只能用點位編輯
hoserab (2020-07-22 00:39:20+00:00): FYI the "official name" tag is used where a more common name is the one is typically used. It's not actually very common to need to tag something with "official_name=*".

Road names in Calgary should be "<Name> <Road type> <QD>", where 'QD' is the quadrant abbreviated to two letters. E.g. this road actually is named Edworthy Street, not Patrick Avenue (no idea where that came from), so the name as it should appear in the tag is "Edworthy Street SW". (I've already made this change.)

:)
brewmanz (2020-07-21 05:37:45+00:00): Oops how do I reverse this? it changed main road to a footpath!
brewmanz (2020-07-21 06:31:12+00:00): I select the change but no 'Revert' button. Can't IRC chat to work. Having a few issues with this.
user_5359 (2020-07-21 06:17:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
DaxServer (2021-02-11 10:16:45+00:00): Hi. Why are the ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631944865 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631944864 disconnected from the roundabout? As far as I remember, one can enter into the roundabout from these two ways. Are there any changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88276830
user_11498075 (2021-02-11 13:02:13+00:00): Hi, Srihari,
Thanks for the glitch,
made corrections
DaxServer (2021-02-11 22:38:30+00:00): Hi Ruthik. Thanks for the quick corrections!!
jmapb (2020-09-15 20:19:01+00:00): Hi Fluffy, wondering what definition you're using for trunk here. The wiki just says that hw=trunk is for "high performance or high importance roads that don't meet the requirement for motorway" and that the criteria vary from country to country, and within the USA from state to state.

Are you basing your changes on a different definition?
Fluffy89502 (2020-09-25 18:32:51+00:00): My apologies. I was using an older definition on the wiki from months ago. I made edits upgrading similar roads to trunk roads and they were all reverted because they did not meet the standards of the time. When editing this, I failed to check the definitions for any updates. If there are any inconsistencies, among other things, that is why. I am very sorry.
jmapb (2020-09-28 22:30:25+00:00): No worries -- I can't speak for the changes you made in NJ but I settled on highway=trunk for both the Brooklyn and Manhattan bridges, since they're limited access but not exactly high speed (far from it.)

Cheers, J
save2desk (2020-07-21 06:27:28+00:00): * части забора.
stefanct (2021-09-27 19:17:50+00:00): Was ist die Quelle für den Namen?
Connecticut (2021-09-27 19:43:46+00:00): Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere, gab es da eine Note mit dem Hinweis, dass die Wasserfläche nicht zu sehen ist.

Ich glaub, der Name war auf einer Node und nicht auf einer Fläche.
Aber genau weiß ich das nicht mehr.
stefanct (2021-09-27 20:00:07+00:00): Verbreitet ist der Name Wasserfallteich nicht (im Internet), aber nachdem er zumindest in offiziellen Dokumenten der MA42 verwendet wird und auch den OGD vorkommt, ist das sicher ok... https://www.stadtrechnungshof.wien.at/berichte/2011/lang/05-20-KA-V-42-2-12.pdf
Ludhiana (2021-04-16 13:51:50+00:00): Hi Habishan,

have you followed the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
GEOnet data may be quite recent – or decades old.

Many of the wells, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7733142118/history , are not visible on any imagery and the location in the wadi seems implausible.

Kind regards
حبيشان (2021-04-19 00:04:10+00:00): Hi Ludhiana,

Yes some of GNS data is old. And many locations are approximate not accurate. 

But there is a good benefit in adding old water wells names because many of then  are used to village names.

Note that water wells in wadis is common in many countries including Yemen see https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/16.63467/53.04736
in imagrey
DP24PH (2020-07-21 07:58:15+00:00): Changeset logs:
1. DOTr Medical Route 12 and City Bus Routes 27, 28 fixes
2. #WashingtonPlacePH accessibility checks (might be included as part of #papercut_fix 62)
3. Tagging clean-up on sections of PH-62, PH-410, PH-419/R-2/GEAH, including simplification of the highway name into 'Aguinaldo Highway' per DP24 suggestions
4. Median checks for PH-419/R-2/GEAH (Sampaloc 2) and PH-410/R-2/GEAH (Buho-Talon)

Legends:
GEAH - Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo Highway

This changeset might be aired as report on #Mapping101 Thursdays S1 E008 and E009.

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Kindly comment down here.

Much love,

DEARPAUL24
user_5359 (2020-07-21 07:47:14+00:00): Hello! Please use alt_name instead of "alt Name".
Myazyk (2020-07-22 07:55:53+00:00): Коли 5 років тому я спілкувався з кимось зі сільради, то мені казали, що у них є вулиця Франка і є провулок Франка.
Чому ти провулок зробив вулицею?
olehz (2020-07-22 09:12:58+00:00): а з чого ти взяв, що мова йде саме про цю грунтовку? по кадастру там взагалі урочище в якості адреси вказано
Myazyk (2020-07-28 20:50:44+00:00): Взяв з того як мені пояснювали.
На кадастрі повно помилок на разі, Надіюсь через 20 років можна буде вірити кадастру
olehz (2020-07-29 07:51:38+00:00): Мені щось підказує, що вони вони мали на увазі не класичний провулок, а піший доступ до хат. Це якось дуже не логічно і я вже з таким стикався: відгалуження чомусь люблять провулками обзивати
Myazyk (2020-07-29 09:18:57+00:00): Так, у горах часто є, що окремі хати, наприклад за річкою, адресують, наче це окрема вулиця, а дороги як такої нема
Myazyk (2020-07-29 09:20:39+00:00): У тій же Ямельниці хата належить до вул Лісової, а там навіть стежки доброї нема до тої хати, не те, що вулиця.
Певно, тре адресу просто на хату ставити чи шо
olehz (2020-07-29 12:28:04+00:00): я мав на увазі, що народ частно не розуміє, що є різниця між адресовими сутністями вулиця/провулок. для них вузьке відгалуження від вул. Шевченка, то провулок Шевченка
olehz (2020-07-29 12:30:11+00:00): Прову́лок (англ. lane; country lane) — невелика, зазвичай коротка, вулиця, яка слугує з'єднанням двох більших вулиць. Провулок є елементом вулично-дорожньої системи. Довжина провулка становить, як правило, один-два квартали.
olehz (2020-07-29 12:33:39+00:00): я хоч вбий не вірю, що в такому маленькому селі, яке по факту складається з кількох хуторів, хтось міг додуматись офіційно затвердити "проспект" чи "провулок"
Myazyk (2020-07-30 10:03:43+00:00): У нас провулок, це зазвичай тупікова вуличка або невеличка вулиця, з якої НЕ відходить інша вулиця.
Спробую подзвонити  у сільраду - уточню
Myazyk (2020-07-30 10:13:46+00:00): Те, що ти маєш сумніви (не віриш), то не означає, що там такого нема.
Є у них провулок Франка.
Навіть у Неті знайшов передік вулиць 
https://postindex.pp.ua/uk/street/lvivska/skolivskyi/yamelnytsia.html
P.S. Перш, ніж знищувати інформацію, тре переконатись, що ти правий, а не чи віриш чи не віриш
Carnildo (2020-07-22 08:07:00+00:00): Are you sure all of these are adits?  A mine with a name of "pit", if it's not an open-pit mine, is usually an exploration pit or mineshaft (either of which should be tagged "man_made=mineshaft").  One with "placer" in the name is almost certainly a placer mine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placer_mining) of a streambed (there's no tag for this, but "landuse=quarry" isn't too wrong).

There are also a few outright mistakes here.  For example, if you look at "Esri World Imagery", the surface scars of Rainbow Quarry are quite visible.
Adam Schneider (2020-07-23 04:50:50+00:00): I admit it's not a perfect solution, and I'll try to correct some of them based on their names if they contain "Pit" or "Quarry," etc.

But I'm willing to bet that having all of them tagged as "adit" means far fewer mistakes than when they were all "quarry"! I was getting tired of seeing mountains in gold country dotted with erroneous quarries, which some renderers display very prominently -- I guess because they're "landuse"? (But at least "quarry" made more sense than the mines I found in the Owens Valley that were tagged as military minefields!)
Adam Schneider (2020-07-23 17:56:16+00:00): OK, I reverted a bunch of them. In reality, of course, most of these mines should be removed or at least marked as "disused," but that would require specific local knowledge.
smootheFiets (2020-07-21 07:39:42+00:00): Dit is een probleem voor knooppunt-route 6-14, ik weet. Maar hier is echt geen uitzondering voor fietsers. Aan westkant en kruising Terpweg zelf gezien, aan de oostkant op GSV. Misschien gaat de route andersom over de Hoofdweg? Ik weet het niet, heb niet op knooppunt-bordjes gelet tijdens mijn survey.
dvdhoven (2020-07-21 08:20:51+00:00): Ik hewb 06-14 heen en terug weg gescheiden, heen Peperstraat, terug Hoofdweg

Vriendelijke groet,
Dick van den Hoven
smootheFiets (2021-04-04 21:36:40+00:00): Hoi Dick,
Ik zie toevallig op NDW verkeersbordendata dat de eenrichtingsverkeer hier opgeheven is Zie https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?id=9873304 en https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?id=9870854 (type: deleted; removed 2021-01-12). Ik ben hier sinds laatste zomer niet meer zelf geweest. Misschien kan route 6-14 weer terug?
Groeten, smootheFiets
dvdhoven (2021-04-15 13:50:14+00:00): Ik zie dit commentaar nu pas.
De reactie stond in de spam folder.
06-14 is onlangs door mij  heen en terug over de Hoofdweg gelegd.
eggie (2020-07-21 09:28:29+00:00): Dag Jeroen,
Lijkt me oke.. Zou wel incline=o% verwijderen. Paden (brandgangen)  die tussen de schuurtje doorlopen en geen reguliere looproute zijn voor iedereen zou je op access=private kunnen taggen. Niemand wordt graag met een routeplanner door brandgangen gestuurd. 
Je edits: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88282258
Gr eggie
mueschel (2020-07-24 09:09:15+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758638591
I think something went wrong with copy and pasting the name.
Firelans (2020-07-25 12:07:44+00:00): Hi matoori. I have made some alignments to this car park weeks ago. May I ask on why the road becomes zig-zag again? Thank you.
matoori (2020-07-26 16:08:40+00:00): Hi Firelans,
Hope you are doing good, While fixing incorrect edits in Singapore it is been observed that you have deleted way 464759059
way 646693244 and created a new way 804046139 adding oneway=no to the segment. May I know what made you delete the existing data along with the restrictions added to them.Here  I removed the tag oneway=no which is not required specifically, as OSM consider a newly created way as bi-directional road itself by default. 

Also I see many smooth alignments to the segments like node 7520534769 to 
node 7682025573 and deleted way 821435030 do we have any OSM policies to do so? 

Kindly suggest any wiki page which u are referring to.

Thanks,
matoori
Firelans (2020-07-27 09:37:34+00:00): Hi matoori,

Thank you for your prompt response. Yes, I am doing good. I hope you are doing good too. 

Based on my observation again, there is no U-turns signage placed along that road informing motorists not to U-turns. In addition, my understanding with Housing & Development Board, motorists are allow to U-turn within service roads and car parks as long not causing obstruction to the traffic. Hence, Ids place along service roads and car parks are incorrect and need to be removed. Hope this clarifies.

I will straightened the road along car park B13 and service road.

Thank you.
Firelans
limes11 (2020-07-21 14:46:56+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe den Wikieintrag wieder entfernt. Wikilinks gibt es für die jeweiligen Objekte, aber nicht fuer Objekttypen. Der Bonner Zähler taucht auf der Wikiseite auch nicht einmal in der Liste auf...

Beste Grüße, Limes
Schlawehner (2020-07-22 19:10:45+00:00): Alles klar, danke für das aufmerksame Verfolgen!
Eine schöne Woche.
marczoutendijk (2021-09-01 08:57:49+00:00): Dag Jaap, 
Je kunt overwegen om ook nog construction=residential toe te voegen voor Casterhoven.
Marc.