piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2019-06-09 06:59:58+00:00): Hallo  bruno_vt,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz auch diese Brücke https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661257348/history neu eingezeichnet. Dazu hast Du 2 Multipolygone (MP)  unnötig und doppelt und fehlerhaft erstellt.
Bei einer eingeschossigen Brücke ist kein MP erforderlich und sinnvoll. Ich habe die MPs daher gelöscht.
Grüße
Joker234 (2019-10-04 10:30:26+00:00): Ich wurde darauf hingewiesen, dass die Straße zwischen Lanzenhofen und Herrot fehlte, obwohl diese, mit Zeichen 260 versehen, immer noch befahrbar war. Ich vermute dass diese auch während deiner Bearbeitung verschwunden ist, siehe auch: https://drop.visintini.info/pAKg2Y7A/+inline

Diese habe ich wieder hinzugefügt, oder gibt es etwas dass dagegen spricht, dass diese Straße dort eingetragen ist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661257356
PT-53 (2019-10-05 07:51:05+00:00): Hallo Joker234,
wie Du hier
https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=15&lat=47.81573&lon=9.95965&layers=BTT&age=1000&user=PT-53
sehen kannst, war dieser Änderungssatz
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71064461#map=15/47.8132/9.9609
meine einzige Änderung in diesem Bereich und dieser Änderungssatz hat nichts mit der fehlenden Straßen zu tun. Die Straße fehlte auch schon vor meiner Änderung.
Der Fehler muß also wo anderst liegen.
Grüße
Akkurator (2019-10-05 08:49:15+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
ich denke, Joker234 meinte bruno_vt.
Der hat in diesem CS das fragliche Straßenstück entfernt.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66108394
Grüße, der Akkurator
Joker234 (2019-10-05 13:59:11+00:00): exakt den den ich kommentiert hatte meinte ich :) Danke für deine Klarstellung.
Dr Udo Brömme (2019-01-07 21:34:46+00:00): Hi santamariense, please explain what you've changed here.
santamariense (2019-01-07 23:24:12+00:00): Hi. I have realigned boundaries to its correct position, as I wrote in the changeset comment in my native language.
tomfabrega (2019-01-07 20:39:34+00:00): Just out of curiosity: Are you re-editing Kvie So because of my changes just minutes before or is it complete coincidence?
Hjart (2019-01-07 21:24:39+00:00): Not a coincidence :-). I was checking out your changes and as usual spotted a few things I could improve myself :-)
Hjart (2019-01-07 21:25:47+00:00): Sorry if I interupted one of your uploads.
tomfabrega (2019-01-07 21:36:00+00:00): No worries. You didn't interupt anything. Have a great day.
muralito (2019-01-08 01:55:25+00:00): Las restricciones en U sobre la misma calle como esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9193895 no son necesarias mapearlas. Se consideran es maniobra como no permitida, y debe ser resuelto por los ruteadores, ya que si no habria que hacer el mismo mapeo en todas las intersecciones.
muralito (2019-01-08 01:56:25+00:00): La otra, que la calle "from" y "to" son distintas, si esta bien mapearla.
Juan Manuel Dócile (2019-01-08 02:58:56+00:00): Ok, gracias.
Hjart (2019-06-18 07:12:40+00:00): I dette rettesæt ændrede du på https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24212011 overflade fra asfalt til sand. Jeg syntes nok Magic Earth opførte sig underligt her :-/
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2019-06-18 08:51:01+00:00): Tak, rettet.
Har kørt en overpass søgning og fundet og rettet et par andre lignende problemer.

Der er stadig et par highway=steps, surface=sand, hvilket virker lidt mistænkeligt, selvom det kunne være noget med nogle brædder, der holder sandet på plads.
Thibault Rommel (2021-03-12 10:09:11+00:00): Je hebt een hele hoop residentiele straten naar woonerf "living street" veranderd. Woonerven zijn altijd aangeduid met de borden F12a/b, hier niet het geval.
mueschel (2019-01-09 11:59:18+00:00): Hi,
this way has 2 maxspeed tags, could you check which one is right?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661265902

Jan
Szymson (2019-01-10 09:49:08+00:00): Now it is correct, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66188853
attili1 (2019-11-01 02:09:20+00:00): Hi feta2,

Hope you are doing well. While working in the Singapore region, I came across segments where motorway classification has been modified as [motorway_link](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link). Basis OSM guidelines, dual carriage segment is marked as motorway and branch off way should be tagged with highway=motorway_link and oneway=yes[link]

Basis the OSM wiki information,  
- We have modified the classification for ways 626073789, 476988736 from motorway_link to motorway as it is a dual carriageway and not a ramp segment
- By tagging it as a motorway_link, the routing engine will interpret the Expressway (way 626073789) as an exit which would lead to an inccorrect route. 
- As per ground truth, Halus link (way 635098148) is the actual exit from Kallang-Paya Lebar Expressway at node 244985683 

We have gone ahead and corrected this edit. Let us know if you have questions on the same. Thank you.

Happy Mapping,
attili1
feta2 (2019-11-04 20:24:36+00:00): Hello attili1, 

I based the motorway_link classification on the “Motorway Ends” sign seen here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=1.3780783333333204&lng=103.91251183333338&z=18.26503562470161&pKey=ingiAPYWjSHQu-6VAe0nWu&focus=photo
I agree the highway junction, 9C, could be ambiguous in this situation and the best solution would be to specify “ref:left=9C”. Related to this issue, I believe “ref=KPE” should be added back to these ways if they are to remain classified as motorway.

Cheers,
feta2
attili1 (2019-11-06 11:25:35+00:00): Hi feta2, 

Thank you for the clarification but as per OSM Wiki "ref:left=*" tag has been deprecated [link]. So as suggested, we added "ref=KPE"  to way 626073789, way 626075660, way 476988736 and are retaining the classification as motorway. Let us know if you have any questions.  

Thanks,
attili1
feta2 (2019-11-07 00:23:06+00:00): Hello attili1,

It looks like you didn’t attach the link you meant to. I was only able to find this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/motorway_junction_Extension that says it is abandoned (inactive) not deprecated. Per this wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Proposals_with_%22Abandoned%22_status it states "Note that popular tags in active use may have abandoned and inactive proposals”. I was specifying adding “ref:left=9C” per the motorway_junction wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway_junction#Example which recommends it as an option. The motorway_junction page was recently edited in August of this year.

Thanks
Tomas Straupis (2019-01-08 06:37:21+00:00): Grąžinau miško žymą parke. Parkas neparodo, ką fiziškai rasime toje vietoje: mišką, pievą, tvenkinį ar pan.
ndm (2019-01-07 22:15:35+00:00): I surveyed this - why has it been moved?
Mike Baggaley (2019-01-07 23:05:06+00:00): Apologies, your edit seemed to imply you had turned the node into a shop (shop=yes was added). It is quite common for naptan imported bus stops to get hijacked and merged with other items which have the same or similar names (e.g. a stop named Post Office will be moved and amenity=post_office added). I have moved it back again (but left off shop=yes).
Regards,
Mike
ndm (2019-01-07 23:24:57+00:00): Oh bother, that means the "shelter=yes" I meant to add didn't make it :-)
Supaplex (2019-02-06 14:16:34+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
viloan (2019-01-07 20:49:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-01-07 21:33:52+00:00): Dag stevietv.. Ik heb de playground losgemaakt van de omringende wegen. het is beter om vlakken niet aan wegen te plakken. Het wordt dan moeilijk om later iets te veranderen. 
MVG,
Eggie
stevietv (2019-01-07 21:55:32+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Bedankt, dat is wel goed om te weten, en netjes uitgelegd.
Bedankt,
Stevie
eggie (2019-01-07 21:59:54+00:00): Dag Stevie,
Zelf heb ik als achtergrond de BGT omtrekgericht in combinatie met de PDOK van juni 2018.
Je kunt ook een layercombinatie downloaden en die kant en klaar als achtergrond gebruiken. Je ziet dan zelfs het straatmeubilair en de trottoirs. (Landmeetkundige dienst. )
Kijk eens hier hoe dat moet..
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg

Mapse,
Eggie
BeKri (2019-01-08 13:38:08+00:00): Die Straße heißt sicher nicht "privat" und ist mit access=privat bereits als privat gekennzeichnet.
Bitte den "Namen" wieder rausnehmen, Danke.
Omnific (2019-01-07 22:42:25+00:00): Whoops, meant to put 30 into the speed limit, not lanes. Good catch, thanks.
chachafish (2019-01-09 11:24:25+00:00): Hello :) Just so you know, Poet's Row has already been mapped. You can see it via the link below. If you have any questions, contact me. Thanks https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542521041
joost schouppe (2019-03-10 14:40:14+00:00): You added construction=trunk to a highway=trunk. That doesn't make much sence. Did you mean to indicate that this road is currently under construction? In that case, it's better to add construction=minor in case the works don't impede access or change it to highway=construction + construcion=trunk.
Tuxicoman (2019-03-10 15:19:18+00:00): I didn't know how to tell the road is in heavy reworking. So I would like to put a tag so that GPS don't use this road, temporarly.
joost schouppe (2019-03-11 08:16:50+00:00): OK, thanks for clarifying! What I explained above should work, I'll change it in that sense. Do you keep an eye on this area? If so, please remove the construction tag and put the highway tag back to trunk when all is over. If not, let's leave a Note here that someone checks in a few months?
amoore6 (2019-01-07 21:40:44+00:00): added missing segment to connect road to twinned road.
azakh-world (2019-01-11 17:10:25+00:00): Order of stop_positions and platforms inside a route relation counts. Otherwise metro could not be processed correctly by mapping software.
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-03-29 15:10:50+00:00): Ok
letihu (2019-03-04 11:57:05+00:00): Die Wege z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661288704/history
sind ja ganz schön. Perfekt wären sie, wenn du auch noch den Wasserlauf
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60807802/history#map=15/52.7677/7.7711
berücksichtigen würdest. Es fehlt ein Tunnel oder Brücke.
FvGordon (2019-01-07 22:28:42+00:00): Two boundary segments are not connected at node 6190986131.
szydzio (2019-01-07 22:33:47+00:00): Thanks for help - I corrected the error. It should be OK now ?
mueschel (2019-12-31 11:45:16+00:00): Hi,
the key 'socket:ccs' is not used up to now, because it's ambiguous. 
It's likely either type1_combo or type2_combo, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket

Could you check / fix this?
m86 (2020-01-01 19:09:01+00:00): I've changed the tag to 'socket:type1_combo', which is probably accurate in this instance. I have not *confirmed* this, but I'll confirm this in person when able..
Phyks (2019-01-08 08:11:54+00:00): Bonjour,

La modification faite a supprimé la banque "Crédit du Nord". La bonne façon de procéder est de créer un nœud (point) dans le bâtiment avec les informations pour décrire le Crédit du Nord.

De façon générale, si un bâtiment est occupé en entier par une activité, l'activité est ajoutée sur le bâtiment. Sinon, il vaut mieux utiliser un nœud dans le bâtiment.

Bonne journée,
skorpion62 (2020-02-12 19:50:59+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

der Straße Hillenland hast Du 2 Straßentypen gegeben, es kann aber nur ein Straßentyp richtig sein, entwederOrtsstraße oder verkehrsberuhigter Bereich (Spielstraße).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634366318

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634366320

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/634366319

Außerdem gibt es keine Schlüssel mit _1 (Unterstrich1) am Ende,
egal welcher Schlüssel das ist.

Viele Grüße skorpion62
NGL-engel (2020-02-12 20:28:34+00:00): Hallo skorpion62, 
   ist geändert. 
Hatte das Online-Programm selbstständig zu dem Zeitpunkt angelegt als die Straße "im Bau" war. Aber du hast Recht, das gehört da natürlich nicht hin. 
Gruß
   Angela
skorpion62 (2020-02-12 21:13:55+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
danke für die schnelle Korrektur. 
Auf dem Spielplatz westlich von der Hillenland Straße ist auch noch ein Spielgerät mit playground_1. hier bitte den Schlüssel löschen.
Die Hütte die Du mal richtig angelegt hast, hat jetzt eine Adresse, die kannst Du auch wieder löschen.
Danke.

Viele Grüße skorpion62
skorpion62 (2020-03-10 07:57:02+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel, 
vom Hillenland geht noch ein Fußweg, der hat  2 Schlüssel. Dieser Schlüssel wird bei Osmose angezeigt. Bitte diesen Schlüssel highway_1=footway  löschen.

Spielgerät mit playground_1. hier bitte den Schlüssel löschen.
Die Hütte die Du mal richtig angelegt hast, hat jetzt eine Adresse, die kannst Du auch wieder löschen. Oder hat die wirklich eine Postanschrift und man kann dort Briefe hinschicken.??
Viele Grüße skorpion62
viloan (2019-01-07 22:54:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
map per (2020-11-07 21:51:16+00:00): Hi AceTur

does the maxweight really apply to this road or does it only concerne the Thalkirchener bridge?

map per
dval (2019-01-16 16:14:02+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вы нарисовали улицу Ветеранов, но забыли соединить ее с общей сетью дорог дорогой не ниже unclassified. Такое небрежение негативно влияет на рейтинг области в валидаторе http://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-SVE/. То же произошло с улицей Бажова.
Anakil (2019-01-08 20:18:59+00:00): Bonjour IWBRABANT, 

Merci de tes contributions, juste quelques petits conseisl : 
- attention quand tu traces des sentiers ou routes à ne pas les superposer avec des éléments qui n'ont pas de sens, comme par exemple une maison. Tu l'avais fais dans le village de Strichon où tu avais superposé le sentier avec les bâtiments, et je suppose que ce n'est pas le cas en réalité ! ;-) 
- Aussi, ne pas superposer deux fois un chemin au même endroit (comme ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661300287#map=18/50.57291/4.48685 ) car c'est considéré comme du "vandalisme" (c'est redondant et implique des erreurs). Dans un cas comme celui-là, il faut s'arrêter à la première intersection avec le sentier et le recommencer à la seconde intersection ! :-) 

Sinon, essaye de ne pas joindre les points de type "place" (comme les "localité", "hameaux", "ville", …) comme celui de Strichon avec d'autres éléments (il était joins à la route) car ce sont des éléments de la carte qui ne doivent être lié à rien d'autre. 

Aussi, si tu souhaites discuter ou intérargir (poser tes  questions…) avec la communauté belge d'OpenStreetMap, n'hésites pas à nous contacter via un des moyens suivants : https://openstreetmap.be/contact.html (on a un e-mail, une mailing list, un chat Riot (ou IRC), des réseaux sociaux…).

Happy mapping,
Anakil
Membre d'OpenStreetMap Belgium
letihu (2019-02-10 14:39:25+00:00): Hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593142284/history
und an 13 weiteren Linien sind die tags "bungalow" entfernt worden. Leider ohne Kommentar. Nun sind die Linien ganz ohne tag. Das erscheint mir auch nicht richtig ;-)
muralito (2019-01-08 01:26:02+00:00): Hola GeoidDude.

Este tipo de accesos son accesos "piratas" y no son legales, pero existen, por lo que corresponde etiquetarlos con "access=no".

Gracias.
GeoidDude (2019-01-08 17:35:16+00:00): Thank you for the local information.
Carnildo (2019-01-08 09:12:43+00:00): A couple of mapping tips:

1) Once you've drawn something, you can square up the corners to a perfect 90 degrees by right-clicking on it and selecting "Square" from the menu, or by hitting the "S" key.

2) You can change which background imagery you're using by clicking on the "Background Settings" tab (the one that looks sort of like three stacked sheets of paper) and selecting which imagery you want.  In the Sandpoint area, it looks like "DigitalGlobe Standard" is the newest but blurriest, "Esri World Imagery (Clarity)" is the oldest and sharpest, and the default "Bing" imagery is an average.  The grassland you added here looks like it's been partly built-over in the DigitalGlobe Standard imagery.
SomeoneElse (2019-01-08 01:03:56+00:00): Also includes signed named junctions up the A1 and A64 to Fulford
Supaplex (2019-02-06 14:15:07+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Baloo Uriza (2019-01-23 04:14:55+00:00): Physical medians should be mapped as dual carriageway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66113785
datbrahm (2019-01-23 09:29:31+00:00): Hi Paul,

Thanks a lot for your response. I have made the edit and added the dual carriageway.
Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Brahm Datt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66113785
iandees (2019-01-08 14:52:34+00:00): Looks good! Thanks for making the roads more precise.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66114920
viloan (2019-01-08 02:22:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-01-10 11:58:19+00:00): Hi,
please check this road, something went wrong with the name tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661322910
El Pescador (2019-01-11 01:02:39+00:00): Thank you, I went ahead and fixed it
Dimacn (2019-01-08 13:09:21+00:00): Пожалуйста не выдумывайте сами названия объектам! Если нет официального названия, то тег name не заполняется. Пожалуйста исправьте добавленные вами объекты.
Ali Zangeneh (2019-01-08 21:18:39+00:00): با تشکر از اضافه کردن نام سوهان فروشی. سوهان فروشی شما به ساختمان تغییر و اطلاعات اصلاح شد
viloan (2019-01-08 04:51:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
chnav (2019-01-09 04:21:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этой правке вы удалили здание бывшего строймага "Ваш Дом", хотя на его месте уже строится новое здание практически в тех же размерах. Пожалуйста ничего не удаляйте без достаточных оснований, можно изменить теги, например landuse-=brownfield (место под застройку). Вместе со зданием вы удалили его адресную информацию, которую вносили другие пользователи. Пожалуйста будьте аккуратнее и уважайте чужой труд.  
Спасибо
chnav (2019-01-09 04:22:02+00:00): Здание восстановил https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160730457