piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kobbe (2024-04-18 19:22:56+00:00): Hi! Because that is how snowmobile tracks are tagged everywhere in sweden to my knowledge. They are not real ice roads that a car can drive on. The ice road tag does not mention snowmobile.
kobbe (2024-04-18 19:27:43+00:00): "Snowmobile traffic on ice covered waterways is generally legal (snowmobile=yes or snowmobile=designated + ice_road=yes)."
clay_c (2021-10-12 17:06:47+00:00): Hallo flierfy,

Warum hast du hier die Linie »Bethlehem Branch« nach usage=main aktualisiert? Die ist ein industrieller Zweig mit einer Grenzgeschwindigkeit von 15 mph (~25 km/h). Früher war sie vielleicht eine Hauptlinie, aber heute trägt nur örtlichen industriellen Verkehr.

Hier zurückgekehrt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112427159
clay_c (2021-10-12 17:08:24+00:00): (English)

Hello flierfy,

How come you changed the Bethlehem Branch to usage=main here? This is an industrial branch with a speed limit of 15 mph (~25 km/h). Perhaps it was once a main line, but today it only carries local industrial traffic.

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112427159
flierfy (2021-10-18 19:40:40+00:00): Die Bahnstrecke wurde als Hauptbahn angelegt. Und die geometrischen Parameter nach denen sie deswegen trassiert wurde, verliert eine Bahnstrecke nicht wieder, egal wie wenig dort momentan verkehrt.
Viele Grüsse, Stephan
clay_c (2021-10-19 03:45:42+00:00): Continuing in English.

In OpenStreetMap we map the current state of things, not history. Today this segment of track is usage=industrial. If you would like to tag it as usage=main, feel free to record the history of the line on OpenHistoricalMap.

If we were to map *any* historical main line as usage=main, regardless of the actual operation of the line, we would end up with a lot of short dead-end main lines cluttering the map. There are quite a lot of historical main lines in the US that are today truncated to local industrial spurs. Thus, we do not automatically tag usage=main on historical main lines in the US.
Reza_koulivand (2021-03-17 11:17:33+00:00): سلام، آقای Seif63 خسته نباشین، شما الان درجه جاده دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد نهاوند رو به درجه سه عوض کردین مسیر یاب بخواد از جاده اصلی مسیر بهت بده از مسیر دانشگاه بهت میده،مثلن بخوایی از کمربندی بیایی کوهانی از جاده دانشگاه بهت مسیر میده
eggie (2021-03-16 18:10:08+00:00): Dag Loebas.. Correct zo.. Voor de nettigheid heb ik de nodes verbonden met het gebouw zoals gebruikelijk.
De building passage heb ik ook maar omgetagd naar woonerf. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-16 18:15:49+00:00): Dag Enna.. Je hebt in ieder geval een weg vastgemaakt aan een hoogspanningskabel. Daar om is het gebied van je edits al zo groot.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101136277

Je edit met editor iD en bewerkt relaties.  Lastig even te checken zo, maar dat kan veel beter met editor JOSM
Kijk bij de routerelaties hieronder welke je hebt bewerkt.
Wanneer je routes bewerkt gaat vaak de route volgorde verloren.

Zal even kijken naar de routerelaties.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-16 18:19:36+00:00): Kabel lag los..Je had alleen een node verplaatst.
eggie (2021-03-16 18:22:36+00:00): Hertogenpad ligt op een paar plaatsen verbroken of door elkaar.
Even kijken of het simpel te repareren is.
eggie (2021-03-16 18:25:21+00:00): Rondje Schaijkse heide klopt..
eggie (2021-03-16 18:37:12+00:00): Hertogenpad klopt weer..

Kijk eens naar editor JOSM
editor josm stap voor stap 
...aanrader voor routes

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2021-03-16 18:41:19+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier nog iets aan?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Mountain_biking

MVG
eggie
dvdhoven (2021-03-17 07:19:21+00:00): Zo plusminus 15 routes zijn beschadigd geraakt. Allemaal sorteerfouten door doorknippen
Ik ga ze nu repareren
eggie (2021-03-17 07:33:12+00:00): Oke Dick..  Zover was ik niet eens gekomen. 
MVG
eggie
Enna_t (2021-03-17 08:16:47+00:00): Allebei bedankt voor het reviewen en het repareren van de fouten.
Ik was me er niet van bewust dat routes beschadigen bij het doorknippen. Ik zal de JOSM editor leren te gebruiken voor m'n volgende routes. Hopelijk gaat het dan beter.
eggie (2021-03-16 18:54:02+00:00): Dag buurman..

Bedoel je met 	Verborgen Verbleif  wellicht
Het Verborgen Verblijf?
Ik heb wat aangepast.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-16 18:55:28+00:00): Welkomstmail per PB verstuurd.
user_11418917 (2021-03-16 19:49:24+00:00): Spam Deleted. please dont add spam again.
user_5359 (2021-03-17 05:21:49+00:00): Hello! You add a very short access value p. Did you mean private or permissive or public? Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/917962265/history
Jorisbo (2021-03-17 06:03:57+00:00): Hi 5359, thank you for fixing!
Stupid thing : I repaired a thousend of them , and sometimes create new ones myself :-)
Kind regards, Joris
user_5359 (2021-03-17 05:59:04+00:00): Hello! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the busstation https://www.osm.org/node/4926133719 over 100 meters, please check the position.
aceman444 (2021-03-28 09:13:18+00:00): Hi, why are you doing this? Some roads like 'unclassified' are implicitly passable by bike, so no bicycle=yes is needed. On highway=path it may be needed. However, have you visited all the segments of the route to see whether they really are passable and allowed for bikes? There may be traffic signs disallowing bicycler and other vehicles. That is quite common in Slovakia. So unless you did that, never just put bicycle=yes to anything just because it is a member in cycle relation. Please undo all changesets similar to this one, unless you visited every segment of the route. Thanks.
map_jay (2021-03-28 09:25:39+00:00): Hello Aceman, they routes are part of the local cycling network maintained by Mestské lesy Košice. They are marked in real life.
*Martin* (2021-03-30 11:55:08+00:00): Hi map_jay. If it is allowed then there must be a sign. In this case use bicycle=designated.
map_jay (2021-03-30 18:40:52+00:00): Hi Martin, you may be right. In this case, the signs are tourist route signs, not traffic signs. The routes were never specificity designed for cycling, but cycling is allowed, as far as I understand. 

I understand the guidelines on the wiki about bicycle=designated require a route to have traffic signs.

Thanks for you comment and I hope we can work this out.
ljb_nj (2021-03-16 21:26:03+00:00): Hi, can you explain this no-comment change you made to some mapping I did a while ago? You deleted a tag amenity= on the building, and added separate nodes for each amenity?  Please add changeset comments so people will know what you are doing and why.
Something B (2021-03-16 21:30:40+00:00): Hi, ljb_nj!
Yes, I have added individual nodes inside the building outlines.
ljb_nj (2021-03-17 00:33:50+00:00): Yes I see that, but why? I'm not saying what you did is wrong. The wiki says amenity can be on a node or an area/building. Is the problem that I had multiple values for the amenity tag? I remember reading somewhere that isn't well supported.
Something B (2021-03-17 08:11:22+00:00): Multiple values for primary tags (such as amenity) are not supported by popular renderers.
Something B (2021-03-17 08:27:58+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multiple_values
ljb_nj (2021-03-17 14:02:53+00:00): Thank you for clarifying that for me. I will avoid use of multi-value tags such as amenity.
bayosm (2021-03-17 03:22:26+00:00): Вы ошибочно передвинули точку контура парковки и изменили её геометрию. Пожалуйста исправьте - 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292914120   Передвинутая точка - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2964705035
bayosm (2021-03-17 04:05:15+00:00): я исправил
Britzz (2022-11-27 21:46:42+00:00): S'agit-il d'un oeuf de pâques ? Il n'y pas de tel panneau à l'entrée de cette rue piétonne.
marc__marc (2021-03-22 09:15:47+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118474876
la clef courante est bien ref:clochers.org et non ref:clochers
du coup changer qu'une occurrence n'a pas trop de sens, il faut soit garder la clef la plus courante soit ouvrir une large discussion pour basculer tous les objets
Cordialement,
Marc
Bernard59118 (2021-03-26 17:05:38+00:00): Bonjour, 
Osmose a signalé cette clé, j'ai donc fait les modifications en gardant l'origine des infos avec indication de la source
gitouche (2021-03-16 18:52:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a beaucoup d'erreurs dans ce changeset. Vous avez taggé avec source:name:oc beaucoup 943 noeuds qui n'ont pas de nom, ni de tags. 

Corrigé dans les changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101139531 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101139147

Merci de faire attention et contrôler vos données avant d'envoyer vos modifications.
gitouche (2021-03-16 18:53:43+00:00): mauvais changeset pour commenter . Le message était pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101068878
VictorIE (2021-03-29 03:40:43+00:00): Hi,

Just be careful in dragging nodes out of position https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1435757949#map=19/51.90021/-8.40177&layers=N
danieldegroot2 (2025-10-30 10:44:31+00:00): Your changes visualised
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101139405
danieldegroot2 (2025-10-30 10:46:10+00:00): This has since been resolved in
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102212248
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-03-18 10:01:07+00:00): Hi, and thanks for the contribution.

The area covered by this changeset is quite large, covering a fourth of the planet for very small changes. This notifies a large amount of mappers without real reasons. In the future, please consider only doing local changes (one changeset for the changes in Florianópolis, one for the changes in Joensuu, etc.).
Something B (2021-03-18 21:06:39+00:00): Hi, Martin!
My apologies! This happened by accident.
Regards,
Something B.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-03-19 09:46:02+00:00): No worries! It happens ☺
mueschel (2021-03-21 11:30:59+00:00): Hallo,
schau bitte mal nach den Gebäuden hier, viele haben ein "roof:hei" Tag, soll das roof:levels heißen?
zorae (2021-03-21 11:36:34+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Ich habe den Fehler behoben.
jalaska (2021-04-28 14:48:01+00:00): Hi, I noticed you edited and added some Road names around Fairbanks. Somehow I can not see these names (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917976866 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908099724) in the TIGER2020 dataset. Do you have local knowledge for these names? And it would be great if you could not fully capitalize the names and not abbreviate things like RD for Road. Thanks!
Anisian (2021-04-29 01:38:49+00:00): You bet. I maintain the Borough 9-1-1 road centerline GIS data and the changes I've suggested are based on based recorded plats, and 2020 aerial photography. A good public portal for this is https://gisportal.fnsb.us/enterprise/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=e5dc9274f0fe4c63889b3256cd807f75 . Your suggestions for abbreviations and complete spelling of road types (Road vs. Rd) are well-taken. I'll be sure to spell out road types. As the authority for road naming in the FNSB we update the US Census TIGER and LUCA data but the TIGER files are quite out of date right now. Our imagery is publicly available - do you know of a way to incorporate it into the OSM base map imagery? Thanks.
jalaska (2021-04-28 14:51:38+00:00): Does this road really exist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917978247
It is neither in the TIGER2020 dataset, nor is it visible in the MAXAR or ESRI World aerials.
letihu (2022-11-03 21:15:50+00:00): Fehlen hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917979111/history
vielleicht noch ein paar tags?
sofalse (2021-03-23 12:27:37+00:00): Na ścieżce jest bramka dla pieszych oraz rowerów, nie rozumiem dlaczego bramka miałaby zostać usunięta z mapy.
zuicz (2021-03-23 13:15:41+00:00): Brama jest oznaczona punktem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8524665894/history
zatem dodając tag barrier=gate do ścieżki mapujemy ten sam obiekt dwa razy. Polecam mapować bramy jako punkty bo wyświetlają się na mapie, a gdy są jako ścieżka to nie wiem czy routing tamtędy prowadzi :)
sofalse (2021-03-23 13:25:04+00:00): Dzięki wielkie za wyjaśnienie :)
Allison P (2021-03-16 22:02:09+00:00): I forgot to mention that I already reversed it, so now it needs to be reversed again. Oops.
VictorIE (2021-03-16 23:25:19+00:00): lol. After I had "fixed it" again, I had hit refresh several times and it wouldn't show properly.
Allison P (2021-03-17 04:23:54+00:00): Coastlines aren't updated on any scale very frequently.
flohoff (2021-09-30 07:32:13+00:00): Moin,
weil ich gerade so fehler durchgesehen habe:

Du hast hier vor 7 Monaten ( Ja ich weiss ist ewig her ) ein source:maxspeed=30 eingetragen - und maxspeed=30 - Vorher war das ein maxspeed=50 - Wollte das jetzt nicht einfach löschen (Also das source:maxspeed)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67628390

Flo
Muhmaker (2021-09-30 12:19:28+00:00): Moin,
danke für den Hinweis. Das war wohl ein copy&paste Fehler. Gemeint ist source:maxspeed=sign. Von der Uhlandstraße bis zur OWD Auffahrt ist 30 per Schild angeordnet. Ich habe es bereits korrigiert
gscholz (2021-03-17 05:31:22+00:00): Hi RosaColacicco,
the two relations you have edited here are not valid and overlapping:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-53.77757&lat=-12.96916&zoom=12&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
LorenzoStucchi (2021-03-17 07:58:15+00:00): Hi,
I checked the changeset, and the way you point out has been deleted in this changeset, so the fact that it remains in the tool is just due to a delay in the tool.
Best,
Lorenzo
gscholz (2021-03-18 05:52:09+00:00): Hi Lorenzo,
yes but the two relations still remain unvalid (missing item roles) and are overlapping (partly duplicates) as well. Who cares about those errors?
As your students use JOSM they should get an error message as soon as they try to upload this type of error. Do you train them to watch out for JOSM validator notifications?
Do you teach your students about what a changeset comment ist and how to deal with it?
Guido
RosaColacicco (2021-03-18 08:28:52+00:00): Hi,
sorry for my mistakes.
This task was divided into 4 'mini' tasks e I found sometimes difficult how to deal with polygons that were already mapped (also because I have to stay in boundaries). I'm not a PolimiMappers, I'm trying to learn and improve my basic knowledge thanks to Lorenzo and others in these days.
I will be more careful. Thanks both for your help!
Rosa
LorenzoStucchi (2021-03-18 08:57:14+00:00): Hi gscholz,
I the errors also the one related to the missing roles in the boundary that was not created by the students.
They learn how to deal with basic errors, some issue like roles in relation are not considered also because it is suggested to don't use relation for beginner users.
gscholz (2021-03-22 05:49:21+00:00): Hi Land-o Calrissian,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.22690&lat=4.56941&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

Guido
gscholz (2021-03-25 05:44:42+00:00): Hi Land-o Calrissian, 
this error still exists. Can I get a feedback here?
Guido
Land-o Calrissian (2021-03-25 22:54:30+00:00): Hi Guido, sorry for my slow reply. It seems that we have accidently added a few additional road segments on top of the existing roads when attempting to add turn restrictions. I am not sure exactly how this might have happened, but I have gone ahead and removed the duplicate highway segments in the changeset found here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101748095 . Hopefully, this resolves the issues on the map that you have mentioned. If there is anything else that you may need, or if there was something that I may have missed, please feel free to reach out again. 

Thanks,

Land-o Calrissian
Glassman (2021-03-18 16:32:20+00:00): #TIP: The building already contained the address, you could have add the business to the building outline. That's assuming it take up the entire building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101141511
5m4u9 (2021-03-17 00:38:51+00:00): tiene nombre el negocio?
maraf24 (2021-03-16 20:54:00+00:00): Jest OK, choć przebieg dałoby się zrobić w wersji mniej kanciastej:)
Koryta najlepiej widać po zrobieniu negatywa z podkładu ISOK, dno się wówczas zmienia w grzbiet górski, świetnie się to odrysowuje.
Pozdrawiam.
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-12-17 17:48:34+00:00): Porque alterou este ponto para um semáforo erradamente? Espero que tenha mais cuidado da próxima vez para não destruir trabalho de outros!
◪ Jarv (2021-03-31 06:08:54+00:00): You have used adandoned:highway which suggests that the old road has "fallen into serious disrepair and which could only be put back into operation with expensive effort. Such features will still have some physical form reflective of their former use visible in the landscape."

However from as far as I am aware the old flyover has been removed with little left to show that it was ever there, for this reason it should be demolished:highway
This will ensure that those using mapping in the future will not remap it if it appears on layer sources.
user_2066394 (2021-03-16 21:18:28+00:00): Was wurde verbessert?
EdLoach (2021-03-17 09:19:55+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset because merging the ways has messed up the PT v2 route relations that use this roundabout.
praeteritum (2023-07-20 04:48:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138743655.
habi (2021-03-17 22:34:43+00:00): Ciao Ethan
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, too!
In this changeset you've added several buildings quite 'freestyle': https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101143848
It's good to add them as rectangles, you can achieve this by pressing the 'q' button after drawing them: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
Happy mapping and greetings from Bern,
habi
Map_HeRo (2022-08-19 18:37:05+00:00): Hallo GerdP, Du schreibst zu diesem CS "Flachen von Straßen getrennt"
aber an der Umgehungsstraße bei Hogenbögen hast Du einen landuse=scrub bearbeitet, der voll auf der Umgehungsstraße liegt ... ist da vielleicht etwas schiefgegangen? Der landuse=scrub ist auch nicht mit dem direkt angrenzenden Wald verbunden, die Linien liegen nebeneinander. Gruß Mikke
GerdP (2022-08-19 18:44:18+00:00): Habe ich auch gesehen und werde ich noch trennen, falls mir keiner zuvor kommt. Ich bin in der Gegend noch lange nicht fertig. Fast jedes Gebäude ist/war  entweder gar nicht oder total verzerrt erfasst, das dauert....
Map_HeRo (2022-08-19 18:50:50+00:00): Oh ja, wenn man da ein bisschen weiter schiebt ... da gibt es noch einiges zu tun. Genau wie hier in meiner Gegend :).
GerdP (2022-08-19 18:53:12+00:00): Beim Trennen ist mir diese Fläche durch die Lappen gegangen, weil sie keine gemeinsamen Knoten mit der Straße hat. Ich habe mir seitdem aber ein paar neue Tests in JOSM gebaut, die vor highway-Knoten innerhalb von bestimmten Flächen warnt.
GerdP (2022-08-20 05:44:20+00:00): Für natural=scrub fehlte mir diese Warnung auch noch. Damals habe ich - glaube ich - erst mal schauen wollen, wie es mit der Brücke dort aussieht. Vielleicht waren auch die Bing-Bilder noch alt. Vorgestern bin ich dann endlich mal für OSM da langgeradelt...
Map_HeRo (2022-08-20 20:54:44+00:00): +1 !
Konkon153 (2021-03-16 20:49:42+00:00): [ und damit alle Adressen in der Gemeinde Ruhner Berge vollständig angepasst ]
Snusmumriken (2021-03-16 21:03:20+00:00): Kaknästornet är väl fortfarande stängt?
DressyPear4 (2021-03-17 16:56:59+00:00): Olá, tag "building" serve para informar que é uma edificação, logo o nome deve ficar em branco
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101144450
Jean Euzébio (2021-03-17 17:26:31+00:00): Ok, irei consertar isso.
351293 (2021-10-14 14:03:33+00:00): Hallo Jakob,
hast Du bzgl. des Fehltaggings den User mal angeschrieben? Das war wohl sein erste Changeset und weil sich da diverse Fehler in vielen CS befinden, arbeite ich die alle gerade durch. 
Falls nicht schon per PN geschrieben, wäre es vlt als Feedback sinnig es dem Nutzer in den CS zu schreiben.
LG
Lars
Jakob48 (2021-10-17 08:26:00+00:00): Hallo 351293,

dessen bin ich mir bewusst dass es um den Mapper um einen Newcomer handelt. Das zeigte auch meine RSS-Feed Liste damals an (xx mapping days).

Bei ihm habe ich das Feedback unterlassen. Der Fehlern, die er gemacht hatte, sind ja nicht so gravierend. Ich lasse ihm die Chance beim Mappen besser zu werden, anstatt ihn zu vergraulen. Das mache ich übrigens seit einigen Monaten auch bei jedem anderen Newcomer.

Meine Erfahrung aus der Vergangenheit bisher sind:
Mancher Neueinsteiger hat das OSM wieder verlassen, nach Anschreiben per PN oder Kommentar auf seinen Changeset.

Es ist leider so bei einen so offenen Projekt wie OSM. Und gleich am Anfang ein richtiges Tagging hinzu bekommen ist nun wirklich nicht leicht.

Gruß
Jakob48
351293 (2021-10-17 12:12:59+00:00): Hallo Jakob,
kein Thema. Ich wollte nur darauf aufmerksam machen, dass wenn man klammheimlich korrigiert und der Nutzer gar nichts davon mitbekommt, dass er dann sich auch schwer verbessern kann.
LG
NedEU (2021-03-23 20:13:49+00:00): Hi there, I think that you may have accidentally misaligned the A55 'Autoroute du Litoral' to the north of Marseille during editing, see: https://i.imgur.com/KgBsAqd.png
DaveF (2021-12-13 23:47:55+00:00): Hi
Do you have a copy of this documentation? Could you put an image of it online for me to view?
DaveF (2021-12-14 00:25:00+00:00): I see you act on people's requests world wide. Do you work for Garmin? If so, it would be really helpful if you indicated that in your profile.
tux67 (2021-03-17 14:29:10+00:00): Hi,
nur ein kleiner Hinweis:
das area tag bei amenity=parking braucht man eigentlich nicht .. 
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101144775
pio2_122 (2021-03-17 08:29:33+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś tag fixme w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/886019033, skoro nie dokonałeś żadnego uzupełnienia/poprawy tagów o którą była tam prośba?
G_P_J (2021-03-17 14:15:05+00:00): Sprawdziłem dane teleadresowe: http://www.slawno.policja.gov.pl/zsl/kontakt/dane-teleadresowe/2421,Dane-teleadresowe.html i znalazłem informację o otwarciu w styczniu. Przeoczyłem tag construction:amenity=police Widzisz coś jeszcze do poprawienia? Przy okazji - trzeba poprawić obszar dookoła budynku, bo budowa się już zakończyła. Poprawisz, czy mam to zrobić?
pio2_122 (2021-03-17 14:19:12+00:00): Dzięki za wyjaśnienie.
Nie ma problemu, poprawię to :)
Tijgerd (2021-03-18 13:55:27+00:00): Beste Martin,
volgens https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk waren deze sidewalks juist getagged.. mag ik vragen waarom deze verwijderd zijn??
Martin Borsje (2021-03-18 14:01:47+00:00): We kunnen sidewalks heel goed aan de highway taggen: sidewalk=left|right|both|no. Dat is een heel goed gebruik. EEn stoep wordt ook niet als een separate highway getagged; noch is het een pedestrian area.
Je bent nu aan het micromappen door zelfs de stoep als area te gaan mappen. Routeert ook niet. Vind je dat niet wat te ver gaan?
"Erst in der Beschränkung zeigt sich der Meister"
Tijgerd (2021-03-18 14:06:49+00:00): Ik heb dit juist getest (in OSM) met routing, ging prima, vandaar ook de getagde oversteekplaatsen.
Misschien als voorbeeld op een stuk dat je (nog) niet hebt verwijderd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=50.96981%2C5.85975%3B50.97072%2C5.85297