piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tordans (2022-01-13 12:23:28+00:00): Hallo Joculari, wenn "Plätscherbrunnen" der Name ist, unter dem der Brunnen lokal bekannt aber nicht offiziell benannt ist, könnte "loc_name" passen als Key. Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115950595
milet (2022-01-10 09:02:33+00:00): This way is not a roundabout, just a turning loop: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4838530
I am going to revert this attribute of the way.
eggie (2022-01-09 17:30:39+00:00): Hoi spaanse.. Je infobord zit vast aan de track zelf.. Dat kan beter los lijkt mij. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115950709
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-09 17:43:37+00:00): Het infobord heb ik losgemaakt. Nu nog de keuze links of weg van de weg?
spaanse (2022-01-09 17:49:56+00:00): Het bord staat net iets ten zuiden van de weg. daar staat ook een sculptuur bij dat de doorsnede van de waterleiding laat zien. De verhoging in het landschap zie je voornamelijk in het noorden (naar het zuiden is een hoge betonnen muur)
eggie (2022-01-09 17:57:32+00:00): Mooi .. dan heb ik goed gegokt  :)
De hele Swartendijk heb ik iets meer naar het zuiden gelegd.
Ik gebruik de transparant van de BGT omtrekgericht.. (Landmeetkundige dienst) 
De muur is goed te zien op de winterfoto 2021 PDOK 7cm
tordans (2022-01-13 12:21:41+00:00): Hallo Joculari, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Devents_venue sieht für mich nach einer guten Wahl aus. VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115950793
GinaroZ (2022-01-25 15:08:02+00:00): Better to add access tags here, if it's impassable for all modes then access=private or =no
robochaa (2022-01-25 15:26:48+00:00): ok, will do
kasmar00 (2022-01-09 17:23:11+00:00): Przez przypadek połączone dwa zestwy zmian w jeden. Zmiany w Poznaniu powinny mieć opis: "Grottgera: dodanie miejsc parkingowych, area:highway itp."
PT-53 (2022-06-06 15:58:31+00:00): Super Änderung:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679326318/history

Das soll ein Regenüberlaufbecken sein?
Das ist eine ehemalige Kläranlage.
Bravo
Bolt028 (2022-09-05 11:49:07+00:00): Hi
Could you kindly verify if the street for the added housenumbers on (Way: Francis Road (593207544))  should be Vicarage or Francis Road.

House street names are different from the actual street name.
spiregrain (2022-09-05 12:21:59+00:00): I've fixed it for the houses on Francis Road (593207544) and had a quick spot check of a few other locations.  Can you review and either close this note, or let me know if there are other problems.
Bolt028 (2022-09-05 13:36:15+00:00): Thank you very much.
All seems good in this area.
eggie (2022-01-09 17:42:25+00:00): Tip Wanneer je met routerelaties aan de gang gaat kun je beter over schakelen naar editor JOSM.
Editor iD kan niet goed omgaan met relatiedelen. Routes gaan dan stuk.
Hier is het overigens goed gegaan. 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

Gr eggie
philippec (2022-01-09 19:48:58+00:00): Lovendegem AD Delhaize AED.  Staat die echt buiten ?  Dat zou dan de eerste zijn bij Delhaize.  Misschien willen de SPAR volgen.  Komt er nog een mapillary ?
SekeRob (2022-01-09 17:33:48+00:00): Lol, I 'fixed' this the very same minute so backed off. The question for me being after looking at 4 sets of aerials how it was decided (klaus(?) where the wood ends. Maybe a 5th set of imagery. 😎

ciao
Sandal man (2022-01-19 19:19:37+00:00): Hola compañero mapeador, olvidaste las etiquetas aquí.
Saludos  Jan
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019760864
AntonioLago (2022-01-19 19:54:13+00:00): Cierto. Ya lo he resuelto.
Muchas gracias.
blef (2022-01-11 09:35:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8658742413
La graphie "Abesse" est correcte. Il s'agit d'un toponyme local sans rapport avec la présence d'une abbaye ou de ses occupantes.
Osmose n'est pas parole d'évangile (même à propos des abbesses!).
Ici, il s'est fait leurrer.
abakus_uploader (2022-01-09 23:31:17+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_2066394 (2022-01-10 09:49:08+00:00): Gemeint war vermutich 2 , da könnte man auch kurz beim Mapper nachfragen zur Präzisierung.
Aleksandar1994 (2022-01-11 09:53:06+00:00): Building:level=211 instead of building:level=2 is a huge mistake and it should be dealt without any delay.  Building:levels are now confirmed via mapillary and user has been contacted, thank you for your concern.
user_2066394 (2022-01-11 10:49:39+00:00): Einwandfrei/perfect
kay_D (2022-01-11 13:20:00+00:00): Sorry for that mistake. I was mapping using StreetComplete while walking, and apparently mis-clicking the roof:levels field. So (I am not in Munich) I can only guess it meant building:levels=2 roof:levels=1, but as I cannot confirm, I am happy and thankful for your correction!
Aleksandar1994 (2022-01-11 14:20:28+00:00): Of course, mistakes happen. Thank you for your hard work and commitment.
jpennycook (2022-01-09 17:43:44+00:00): URL was truncated:-

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom

(default access for highway=footway already includes horse=no and bicycle=no, hence redundant)
RicoElectrico (2022-01-10 14:05:46+00:00): Cześć, tę edycję trzeba poprawić - opisów nie dajemy do nazwy obiektu. Patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_u.C5.BCywaj_tagu_name_do_opisywania_rzeczy
impiaaa (2022-01-10 18:34:52+00:00): Hello, please read these 3 pages on the conventions of OpenStreetMap: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I don't know if it's valuable to map these sites as anything more than a note=* on the existing element. Even if it is, you've mapped these as buildings overlapping existing houses, which is invalid.
user_2066394 (2022-01-09 22:48:56+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/994049824
Was ist mit dem Haus passiert? Wurde das abgerissen?
ralfschramm (2022-01-10 06:07:03+00:00): richtig - da werden statt dessen 2 neue gebaut
user_2066394 (2022-01-10 14:57:22+00:00): Da wäre es dann sinnvolll, ein lifecycle prefix zu ergänzen (z. B. demolished:building=*) und/oder die Fläche als landuse=construction einzutragen, dann bleibt der Ort nachvollziehbar.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
ralfschramm (2022-01-10 14:58:36+00:00): Danke für den Tipp!
ElliottPlack (2022-03-30 23:48:08+00:00): Thanks for the work here! I added some of these trails around 6 years ago. I love to see them improved by the community.
CRCulver (2022-01-11 09:51:37+00:00): Why did you place a barrier=gate directly on the highway=secondary at coordinates 52.5328166, 17.5630722?
Krzysiu Jarzyna (2022-01-11 11:08:46+00:00): by mistake, fixed already, thx for info
voltairovicz (2022-01-24 07:59:20+00:00): Jeden z routingow nie prowadzi teraz samochodów przez ekspresowa obwodnicę na Lini wschód-zachód, lecz przez centrum. Nie jestem pewien czy jest to jest pożądane
Yunkers (2022-01-24 14:56:16+00:00): Nie jest to na pewno pożądane, ale zmniejszenie kategorii wjazdów na pewno się do tego nie przyczyniło. Może na tych brakuje jakichś maxspeedów i nawigacje myślą, że tak jest szybciej? Albo po prostu nawigacja do wyrzucenia skoro to nie dotyczy wszystkich nawigacji?
voltairovicz (2022-01-24 19:49:12+00:00): No to akurat routing osmowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=52.5543,17.6767;52.5146,17.4586#map=12/52.5437/17.6169  No ja bym przywrócił primary do Gniezna Północ, ale nie wiem jak inni to widzą
voltairovicz (2022-01-24 19:50:52+00:00): Może tagi destination mają też jakiś wpływ, można dodać
Yunkers (2022-01-25 19:41:56+00:00): Osobiście nie widzę problemu, żeby któryś z łączników dać jako primary, w Lubinie czy Częstochowie takie łączniki z drogami krajowymi są jako primary. Trzeba się tylko zdecydować który wjazd, ja tego nie zrobię, bo terenu nie znam.
Ale czy to poprawi nawigację to nie wiem, nie znam dokładnie algorytmów.
Jrachi (2022-01-10 13:40:44+00:00): Ciao.
Sicuramente hai sbagliato solo riga, ma, hai messo il name nel ref ed il ref nell'old_ref.
Sullo A00C
Francoerbi41 (2022-01-10 15:29:13+00:00): La relazione l'ho inserita io anni fa.
Nel frattempo il CAI l'ha validata inserendo le informazioni aggiuntive.
Ieri mi sono semplicemente limitato a correggere degli errori nella way e a ripristinare la contiguità della relazione.
Devi provare a sentire chi l'ha validata.
Ciao
FE
Jrachi (2022-01-10 16:17:55+00:00): Scusa. Hai ragione.
Si è trattato di un baco nel mio sistema di monitoraggio.

Ciao, Ivo
VA00 (2022-01-10 13:30:37+00:00): To są drogi gruntowe? Podniesiono raban jakby to miał być minimum asfalt...
pebepebe (2022-01-10 15:12:50+00:00): Gruntowe, ta nowa po zachodniej od szczytu jest w trudniejszych momentach podsypana kamieniami więc dałem jej grade4. Przeciętne 4x4 powinno tam dać radę. Może to było tylko przygotowanie do jakiejś lepszej drogi, ale na tą chwilę nie widać żeby coś się miało zmienić.
ottwiz (2022-01-09 18:49:41+00:00): Noticed this in changeset:/115884661
Jordi MF (2022-01-14 21:41:14+00:00): Hola,
Has pedido una revisión de las sendas que has añadido. Parece correcto.
Saludos
davidpook (2022-01-14 21:57:25+00:00): Gracias por la revisión
hauke-stieler (2022-01-16 13:21:31+00:00): Hi,

du hast mit diesem changeset erfolgreich sämtliche Tags von Planten un Bloomen entfernt. Das war sicherlich nicht beabsichtigt, oder?
hauke-stieler (2022-01-16 13:42:45+00:00): Ich füge die tags mal wieder hinzu, da es keinen anderen Knoten o.Ä. für Planten un Bloomen gibt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 16:29:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20082193/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit
Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value
user_5359 (2022-01-09 19:22:05+00:00): Reverted by myself!
Trevor_1 (2022-01-15 18:57:30+00:00): Hi, I hope you're doing well. Here, on OpenStreetMap, the "city" tag is used only for major cities. I'm going to have to change this back to "town".
Rhodez (2022-01-15 18:59:47+00:00): Please do, this was before I knew that and thought it was based of off legal designation. Thanks.
Trevor_1 (2022-01-15 19:33:49+00:00): You're welcome!
hockie (2022-09-20 19:44:41+00:00): Hallo Nicolelaine,

ich habe leichte Zweifel, dass an der Dorfbushaltestelle Wohlenhausen eine Anzeige vorhanden ist (Schlüssel passenger_information_display=yes) die anzeigt wie lange es dauert bis der nächste Bus kommt. Ich denke Sie meinten eine Tafel/Aushang (Schlüssel departures_board) der Busfahrzeiten.

Mit freundlichem Gruß
Hockie
tenzul (2022-01-09 21:12:53+00:00): Hey Lüsi,

freut mich zu sehen, dass du wieder am Kartieren bist. Gut, dass du dich um die Details am Wolfsberg gekümmert hast. Bei der Aldinger GmbH fehlt glaube ich ein 'i' in der Email-Adresse. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9405683413

Schöne Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115955633
Lüsi (2022-01-10 12:12:20+00:00): Hi, 
Danke für den Hinweis, hab es behoben
user_2066394 (2022-01-10 20:42:47+00:00): Straße ist in dem Sinn keine benannt, in dem Fall würde man statt auf
addr:street=*
auf
addr:place=Bürgerwald
zurückgreifen.
villy_halligan (2022-01-10 21:00:38+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Soll addr:place dann addr:street ersetzen oder zusätzlich aufgenommen werden? Zumindest in den ländlichen Gegenden in Bayern kommt es ja häufiger vor, dass Weiler keine extra benannte Straße haben und die Adressen gleich benannt sind wie der jeweilige Weiler (Briefe werden ja auch so adressiert).
user_2066394 (2022-01-10 21:15:49+00:00): In dem Fall würde man nur addr:place=* verwenden und addr:street=* leerlassen.

Als Hilfsmittel ganz praktisch:
https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de
(in dem Fall die roten Punkte, kann je nach Datenstand einige Zeit dauern, bis Fehler angezeigt werden)
andrewsuzuki (2022-05-16 00:42:41+00:00): Is there any reason you changed Baldwin Drive from highway=pedestrian to highway=unclassified?
jnighan (2022-05-16 15:42:30+00:00): highway=pedestrian is not typically used in natural areas such as this. The wiki says it is typically used for "shopping areas, town centres, places with tourism attractions and recreation/civic areas, where wide expanses of hard surface are provided for pedestrians to walk." Using highway=unclassified with an access tag prohibiting motor vehicles seems more in line with standard usage
itineris (2025-09-08 18:05:34+00:00): Szia!

Itt a környéken felvettél egy csomó cave_entrance-t. Ezek nem pincék inkább ilyen szép sorban, a dűlővel párhuzamosan?

Üdv:
Ákos
grin (2025-09-10 12:42:28+00:00): Konkrétan a lukakról nem találok fényképet de itt több nagy föld alatti barlang/pince van, és ezek emlékeim szerint annak a bejáratai. Arra most így hirtelen nem tudok válaszolni, hogy ez most pince, tároló vagy galéria (vagy semmi), de szerintem régen kőbánya volt. Lehet, hogy a man_made=cellar_entrance lenne a pontos, de ezek egy része szerintem nem is vízszintes hanem függőleges akna, arra nem tudom ez a tag mennyire passzol. Oda kellene menni és lefotózni, de még akkor sem biztos, hogy könnyű megmondani, mert minden le van zárva és el van kerítve. Én meg tudok békélni a cellar entrace-szal is. :-)
grin (2025-09-10 12:43:03+00:00): Teszek rá egy markert, hátha járok arra.
itineris (2025-09-10 12:49:09+00:00): Pince: man_made=cellar_entrance, bánya (vízszintes tárója): man_made=adit

Ugyanakkor egy kőfejtőben is lehet barlangbejárat (sőt, számosat úgy találtak meg, hogy bányászás közben beszakadt). De a környékbeliek közül egyik sincs a Barlangnyilvántartásban.
Warin61 (2022-01-11 01:57:59+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

The administrative boundary for 'Fitzroy North' requires the tag 'boundary=administrative', I have reapplied that.

I have removed the way named 'MB Armistice 163-165R' from both admin boundaries 'Fitzroy' and 'Fitzroy North' as it plays no role in these admin boundaries. 

Keep mapping, you will make mistakes as we all do particularly when starting out.
user_5359 (2022-01-16 16:17:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9405638582 . What ist the meaning of the tag jelzőkő=95-ös határkaró
kungabo (2022-01-16 17:31:17+00:00): It was an error, thank you. (Just corrected.) The actual object was a small marker block (jelzőkő means marker stone) that looked like a survey point (with a "+" on its top). It seems it should have been marked as man_made=survey_point. There is a wooden post nearby, with number '95' on it, which is a different node.
VictorIE (2023-01-21 07:37:05+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019799383

Could you review this? The new photos don't quite agree with each other.
LateNightTone (2023-01-21 17:58:10+00:00): Hi,
It's all as it should be - as of writing, the most recent aerial photos are Mapbox premium and Bing and it matches both.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-01-10 16:25:05+00:00): Hoi AnkEric,

"Graslanden" zoals https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019799535 die je over wegen heen mapt vind ik afbreuk doen aan de kaart. Wegen zijn namelijk geen grasland. Dat de berm uit gras bestaat vind ik geen reden om een grote gras polygoon over de weg heen te mappen. 

Op een wat positievere toon, dankjewel voor je recente edits in Nieuwegein. Ik kom daar regelmatig, dus als je lokale kennis nodig hebt kan ik je daarvan voorzien.

Met vriendelijke groet,

Casper
Bolt034 (2022-01-09 20:23:59+00:00): Correction: updated one way direction
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
user_5359 (2022-01-10 19:34:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677633846/history. What is the meaning of the tag yes=no?
matt_ellery (2022-02-07 20:32:32+00:00): Hi Martin, I'm wondering why you removed the shared cycleway (ways 681997657 and 830139646)? Also curious why you removed the tree (node 4856064270) as it's also still there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115957729
Martin Borsje (2022-02-07 20:42:17+00:00): Hi Matt,

There are no separate cycle lanes there. It is a road w/o separate lanes so cycleway will do? Possibly add sidewalk=left"|right.

You could argue emergency access (by the bollards) since access from the west is now w/o any problem.

The removal of the tree is a mistake for which I apologize.

Kind regards,

Martin (regular visitor of a River Walk property)
matt_ellery (2022-02-07 20:57:22+00:00): Hi Martin,
Thanks for clarifying, although I don't 100% agree. There has been a signed cycleway across the bridge next to the road since before it was closed to general traffic. When the road was closed this didn't change (the sign is still there), and they even put a grass verge in between the pavement and the road up to the bridge on the eastern side, making it more separate than it was before the closure. 

No worries about the tree, I've reinstated it.
matt_ellery (2022-02-09 21:09:00+00:00): Hi Martin,
I passed by this area today and now I'm afraid I'm even less convinced by your assertion. There's shared cycle/footway signs on each end of the bridge that have not changed since before the road was closed off to motor traffic and clearly (to my mind) route along the deleted ways. One *could* use sidewalk:left:bicycle=yes for way 180730791, but not on way 431216816 as there is a grass verge in between. Therefore I think it's clearer and closer to reality to have the separate ways as they were before. I'll revert the deletion.
All the best,
Matt
literan (2022-01-10 16:41:42+00:00): корректный тег для подъездов - entrance=staircase. Исправлю.
literan (2022-01-10 16:42:05+00:00): и еще, для дворовых проездов корректный тег highway=service. Верну.
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-10 12:50:12+00:00): Laba diena. Vienai pačiai landuse nereikia kurti atskiro ryšio su vienu nariu :-) Kelis šimtus tokių per paskutinius kelis metus sukurtų ištryniau.
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-10 12:52:11+00:00): Tuo labiau, kad, kaip matau, šitame pakeitime teisingai pažymėtas landuse=residential buvo kažkodėl perkeltas į vieno nario ryšį. Štai šitas elementas konkrečiau: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018932966
PovilasDew (2022-01-10 15:58:15+00:00): Kaip suprantu, reikia siekti vengti vieno nario ryšyje, arba būtinai bent du nariai (?) ryšyje arba daug tokių outer ryšių, kas būtų aktualiau residential arba pievoms miškuose.

Dirbdamas pastebėjau, kad man nepatinka landuse inner esantis paprastas poligonas, geriau, kai abu yra ryšiuose, pvz. landuse inner linijoje būtų residential outer.
Galiu tiesiog daugybė tokių residential sudėti į vieną relation giją.
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-10 20:40:21+00:00): Kelis nesusijusius poligonus dėti į vieną ryšį (kaip outer) irgi negerai - GIS'e be reikalo kuriama multigeometrija, kuri tada visuose skaičiavimuose ir apdorojimuose eina kaip viena.
Ir pagal apibrėžimą ryšys - VIENAS objektas su sudėtinga geometrija.

O kas negerai su inner esančiu paprastu poligonu? Juk būtent taip ir žymimi visi multipoligonai nuo pat jų atsiradimo pradžios.
PovilasDew (2022-01-11 11:13:36+00:00): Ok, supratau
user_5359 (2022-01-10 16:41:20+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22especies%3Agl%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22especies%3Agl%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22especies%3Agl%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=42.18683;-7.80043;18.

Did you mean species:gl = Érbedo instead of especies:gl = Érbedo?
aitorfreire (2022-01-12 20:39:50+00:00): yes i do, it's alredy fixed. Thx!!
user_2066394 (2022-01-10 10:27:41+00:00): Und die übrigen Gebäude?
user_5359 (2022-01-10 14:48:15+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=bcil . Is the correct key bcil:ref or ref:bcil ?
carlesmu (2022-01-10 16:35:19+00:00): ref:bcil i've updated it now,  thanks
user_5359 (2022-01-10 16:44:22+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376494008. What is the meaning of the tag hgvN = continues ?
voschix (2022-01-10 16:50:34+00:00): Corrected - thanks!
SomeoneElse (2022-01-09 22:44:58+00:00): Should be "... in the South East" of course.
Cleveland steamer (2022-01-11 21:29:37+00:00): Please give complete changeset comments out of courtesy to the other mappers. Even with a hashtag in front it wouldn't be sufficient.
SherbetS (2022-01-12 13:37:32+00:00): Hello Cleveland streamer,

The comment on this changeset was automatically assigned by the OSM US tasking manager. I think that the comment is sufficient because you can look up the project and read a detailed description.

I don't manage the project so I didn't actually choose for this comment to be posted.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-12 13:53:47+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

This is not a sufficient or good changeset comment.

> you can look up the project and read a detailed description.

Not really. I am a relatively experienced person as far as OSM goes and have no idea how to do this as this changeset comment is not even providing a link.

And even then description would be about project, not about this specific edit.

> automatically assigned by the OSM US tasking manager

It is possible to edit it and add info what was actually modified
Minh Nguyen (2022-01-12 18:38:58+00:00): Here’s the tasking manager project: https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/248
Minh Nguyen (2022-01-12 19:53:01+00:00): https://github.com/hotosm/tasking-manager/issues/4959 requests that the tasking manager tag the changeset with the project URL like MapRoulette does.
RicoElectrico (2022-04-05 16:45:34+00:00): Hej, ten barrier=bollard +access=no uniemożliwia routing _obok_ torów.
RicoElectrico (2022-04-05 16:46:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=53.0741%2C21.6287%3B53.0735%2C21.6297#map=16/53.0719/21.6240
kubahahaha (2022-04-07 15:26:55+00:00): Poprawione, fajnie że wyłapałeś
Polarbear (2022-01-26 19:34:59+00:00): Hi AlexJ und NaturAufnahmen,
woher stammen denn die 
Geometrie
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115960623
und die Ref
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116111136
der vorgeschlagenen L386?
Wird wirklich zwischen der nunmehr fertigen halbseitigen Anschlussstelle und der Bahnlinie noch ein weiterer Anschluss gebaut?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115961010
Supaplex (2022-01-10 07:53:49+00:00): 第二個電話號碼可以用分號隔開，不用用 phone_1 標籤
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115961312
ConnorWong (2022-05-23 15:34:04+00:00): Hi Mark,

do you know the gauge of these tracks?
Mark Martinec (2022-05-23 17:54:52+00:00): According to aerial photography (GURS DOF025) the long railway tracks are 1.5 m wide, which would be a normal railway track size; the short tracks are about half that size, about 0.8 m, probably narrow-gauge. These are military artillery ranges - target guides. Haven't seen them in person.
user_2066394 (2022-01-10 22:02:12+00:00): Auf dem Weg unter der Brücke liegt aktuell noch
access=no und
description=*