piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
0709 (2022-02-15 15:17:42+00:00): Tussenpunten plaatsen functioneert helaas niet altijd. Manueel routen kan een snellle oplossing bieden maar niet alle routers ondersteunen dit . (Brouter).
Meerdere problemen mogelijk ?  Ja.
Kijk even naar de Langeweg aan die eerste slagboom.
Er is hier als osm info aangegeven voetgangers use sidepath. 
Even verderop diezelfde Langeweg is dat niet meer vermeld.
Waar hoort die voetganger zich daar wel te bevinden dan ? 
En na de tolpoorten is het dan foot no maar bicycle yes.
Moet de voetganger snel achterop een fiets springen dan ? 
Daardoor dat diverse routers die verschillende resultaten geven ?
Naargelang deze routers al dan niet tolerant met deze situaties hier omgaan.
Aangeven in het forum osm ?.
 'tja..schrikt mij een beetje af, ik zal er weer al (te) veel tijd insteken.  Een vrijwilliger mag zich hiervoor best melden ;-)  Groeten !
eggie (2022-02-15 15:22:46+00:00): Advies op het forum vragen kan altijd..
Wellicht hebben voetgangers een andere route om te boarden..? Ik ken de situatie daar niet.
0709 (2022-02-15 15:23:42+00:00): Nog even dit. De meeste Scheldeveren in mijn omgeving voor voetgangers en fietsers heb ik aangepast zodat routering hier meestal wel lukt. Inclusief de nodige fiets dismount natuurlijk. Meer tijd, zeker buiten mijn omgeving, wil ik er echter echt niet aan besteden hoor.
0709 (2022-02-15 15:32:25+00:00): Hoe ik als voetganger vlot op die ferry dan moet komen ? Ik vertrek nochtans met de zegen van de Kerk ....
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=51.978%2C4.135%3B51.975%2C4.124#map=16/51.9775/4.1280
demon_box (2022-02-15 10:28:33+00:00): ciao ;-) ti segnalo che è errato mappare l'indirizzo sull'intero edificio perchè in Italia il civico identifica soltanto il punto di accesso (entrata) e NON l'intero edificio. Perciò se conosci esattamente l'entrata dell'edificio l'indirizzo completo del civico la mappi sul nodo ad esempio entrance=main altrimenti meglio mappare l'indirizzo su un nodo staccato ma vicino al relativo edificio. GRAZIE.
--enrico
trucbidule (2022-02-15 10:52:09+00:00): ciao, ho capito, grazie non lo sapevo.
demon_box (2022-02-15 10:56:54+00:00): ottimo, grazie ;-)
ho già corretto quello che ho trovato.
ciao BuonMapping!
--enrico
demon_box (2022-02-15 11:26:53+00:00): ...inoltre in caso di civico seguito da lettera non si mappa ad esempio 16A ma 16a, cioè la lettera deve essere scritta in minuscolo.
GRAZIE ANCORA.
Buona giornata.
--enrico
trucbidule (2022-02-15 12:59:07+00:00): grazie per le correzioni dei errori, lo ricorderò per le prossime volte.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-02-17 02:22:36+00:00): 朋友您好，您似乎把一个体育场地更改为了学校，但是请注意，我们通常需要把整个学校的范围圈做学校，而不是把一个体育场标为学校，我会重新细化一下您编辑的区域，感谢您对OSM的关心。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117425733
GerdP (2022-07-06 04:52:57+00:00): Moin!
Ich denke nicht, das der Wald Glane heißt. Mein Vater hat mir vor langer Zeit erzählt, "Glane besteht eigentlich nur aus drei Bauernhöfen". Es ist gut möglich, das der Wald zu einem der Höfe und damit zu Glane gehört, aber mehr wohl auch nicht, oder?
Naturpark Wildeshauser Geest (2022-07-06 06:39:06+00:00): Moin,
da haben Sie vermutlich Recht. In den Ni. Umweltkarten (https://www.umweltkarten-niedersachsen.de/Umweltkarten) steht "Kleiner Glaner Sand".
Möchten Sie es ändern?
GerdP (2022-07-06 06:43:32+00:00): Ist die Umweltkarte denn eine zulässige Quelle für OSM? Generell gilt ja: Nicht von anderen Karten abzeichnen!
Naturpark Wildeshauser Geest (2022-07-14 11:48:01+00:00): Guten Tag nochmal,
das sind die offiziellen Karten des Landes. Ich gehe davon aus, dass es nichts "offizielleres" gibt.
Es ging mir v.a. darum, den Teil "Naturpark Wildeshauser Geest/" aus dem Namen rauszunehmen. Im Grunde braucht das Waldgebiet auch gar keinen Namen haben...
GerdP (2022-07-14 16:44:57+00:00): Dann sollte man den Namen Glane löschen.
user_5359 (2022-02-16 16:07:42+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699944201, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699944202. What is the meaning of the following tags
cost = 10000
costId = 4
?
eggie (2022-02-15 12:30:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
BCNorwich (2022-02-16 08:14:43+00:00): Hi, Your new road was placed on top of an existing highway. Thus making duplication that could disrupt routing. You also tagged the no-through road as oneway. How would vehicles get out?

Please note if a feature needs amending/correcting it's OSM practice to make corrections on the existing mapped feature.

I've deleted your duplicate way, keeping relevant new tags.

Regards Bernard.
maraf24 (2022-02-21 20:17:27+00:00): Cześć.
To jest zieleń międzyblokowa, która też bywa parkiem.
Skwery są przy ulicach.
user_5359 (2022-02-17 16:55:59+00:00): Hello again! Did you know the key student:count (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=student) or education:students ? You can use booth, but don't create your own key.
SushmaGhimire (2022-02-17 19:06:10+00:00): Thanks for the feedback @user_5359. Corrected :)
Kovoschiz (2022-02-16 09:01:05+00:00): You should not remove `landuse=construction` when adding `construction=`.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 09:28:57+00:00): Wycofanie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117373900#map=19/53.84766/22.97511
user_14117678 (2022-02-15 16:34:48+00:00): Przestawiłeś boiska w niedokładne lokalizacji, usunąłeś bieżnię i kilka innych edycji, poprawiłem twoje zmiany w: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117443545#map=19/53.84766/22.97511
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 18:16:44+00:00): Wycofałem edycję która dodawała gimnazjum w roku 2022 więc wydawała się jednoznacznie wadliwa i podejrzana ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031045762/history )

Skąd to gimnazjum się tam wzięło?
ma-rt-in (2022-02-17 12:43:47+00:00): Hallo,

ein kurzer Hinweis, wenn du payment:cash=yes verwendest, dann brauchst du nicht notes und coins mit yes zu bezeichnen.

vg
Cybone (2022-02-17 12:50:23+00:00): Hi,

Ja das macht Sinn 😉
Danke
ma-rt-in (2022-02-17 13:03:00+00:00): Nochwas, du hast zum einen allgemein die Nutzbarkeit von Kredit/Girokarten angegeben und zugleich einzelne Karten benannt, hier ist es genau umgekehrt. ^^
Larmax (2022-02-21 13:46:00+00:00): What about alt_name or loc_name?
hee243898 (2022-02-24 08:25:58+00:00): @Larmax : Thank you, changed it to alt_name. I didn't want to use loc_name, because I didn't feel that accurately portrayed the name usage.
Dimacn (2022-02-15 12:21:38+00:00): Статус дороги не определяется её качеством! Качество дороги указывается специальными тегами surface и smoothness. Верните как было. Пожалуйста, перед тем как менять дороги изучите классификацию дорог - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
mavl (2022-05-20 15:36:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-20 18:07:02+00:00): Please explain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031600495
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117427260
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 18:26:31+00:00): is it on the map?

its gets mapped.  1:1 having a real tough day as my PTSD got triggered by your last mod calling me a vandal. I am super law a biding.  please lead with kindness.  please.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 18:28:02+00:00): meta verse not just golf.
i the first real AAAA here.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-20 18:36:51+00:00): filmgrip.ca, im just new and yall swing the ban hammer quick, and judge without understanding even quicker, Or I am missed something Glairing that I just dont know.   How can someone not want professional quality?   i come for a different world, where our world need to look like VFX, and we push everything till it smokes and quality last longer than awesome last longer, our corporate target is 95% accuracy.  I would put 10000 per assets nodes if you let me., but you cap at 2000. and upload cap at 50,000. I decimated all the errors for being too close, I filled out the   corporate user  forms for me an my 1st trained contractor Professional artist Andy  in the UK.  why cant i just finish my work?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-20 19:00:51+00:00): sorry,
I missed the imagery used.
Metasoft™ (2022-02-21 02:47:45+00:00): np, I really want to work with y'all
Jeffrey Friedl (2022-07-09 23:14:35+00:00): こんにちは。川沿いの歩道は「Foot path」ではなくて、「Cycle and foot path」です。「Foot path」は、普通には足だけで通行道です。
Kovoschiz (2022-02-16 09:00:07+00:00): This is not correct up close. HKHA nor HD doesn't directly "operate" HOS.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-16 09:00:27+00:00): `developer=` is already used.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-25 18:34:39+00:00): Please don't attach areas to roads.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-16 15:50:41+00:00): Wyjaśnienie edycji:

Gościu miał mieszaninę edycji ewidentnie bublowatych, fałszywych, i obelżywych i takich co nie były jednoznacznie wadliwe, wycofałem wszystko.

Jak ktoś dodaje fałszywe budynki z obraźliwymi nazwami to nie ma sensu na analizowanie innych edycji, lepiej wycofać wszytko.
JP213769 (2022-02-15 10:38:26+00:00): Jedynego wandala jekiego widzę to ty
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-21 18:21:12+00:00): Wyjaśnienie edycji jest w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117427557
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 09:49:43+00:00): edycja wycofana ze wzgledu na to że to konto używane do wandalizmów
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 09:51:09+00:00): np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1031324498/history
JP213769 (2022-02-15 10:37:43+00:00): Jedynego wandala jekiego widzę to ty
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-21 18:21:06+00:00): Wyjaśnienie edycji w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117427557
AtlantisPWH (2022-02-16 06:56:18+00:00): Hi, Wonder why these places need Ukrainian names hhhh~
user_6110846 (2022-02-17 15:33:10+00:00): these translations for a large number of Ukrainians visiting China 
If you do not like translations - write a complaint to the DW
demon_box (2022-02-15 11:21:06+00:00): ciao, scusa ancora se "rompo" ma anche mappare edifici e strade sovrapposti è da evitare!!
ti invito CALDAMENTE ad usare "Josm" come editor al posto di "iD" perchè quest'ultimo ha pochi controlli e porta a mappare in modo MOLTO impreciso e pieno di errori. GRAZIE ANCORA e BuonMapping!!
--enrico
trucbidule (2022-02-15 13:01:17+00:00): non ho usato Josm da anni, proverò. Era più facile con iD.
demon_box (2022-02-15 13:13:16+00:00): lo so perfettamente che iD è molto più facile (e guarda caso molto più diffuso soprattutto tra i neo-mappatori o mappatori saltuari) di Josm ma è altrettanto molto più impreciso e di conseguenza porta ad un mapping di scarsa qualità... Josm richiede un pochino più di sforzo iniziale ma non c'è paragone con iD, credimi! mappo da 12 anni ed il mapping generato con iD (da qualsiasi utente) è puntualmente inpreciso e pieno zeppo di errori grossolani... dovrebbero ritirarlo quell'editor del cavolo....
ciao
Lejun (2022-02-19 08:51:26+00:00): Merci pour la contribution qui m’a permis d’apporter quelques modifications (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117595164).

Pour faciliter la correction des modifications, il aurait été judicieux de donner une source de données, en l’occurrence le plan de masse (https://www.grandbesancon.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/02/Pont-de-la-republique-Plans-detailles-2-carrefours-et-port-fluvial.pdf) sur le site du Grand Besançon (https://www.grandbesancon.fr/actualite/de-nouveaux-amenagements-et-une-piste-cyclable-sur-le-pont-de-la-republique/) est parfait pour ça. Faute de concret, on connaît les aléas des travaux, je me suis contenté de modifications mineures mais il est tout à fait possible de faire coller les données OpenStreetMap au plan de circulation pdf.

Reste que j’ai plusieurs interrogations : la voie verte au sud-est sera-t-elle requalifiée en trottoir (1),  la voirie faisant 3 m, comment les motorisés se croiseront sur le tronçon en zone de rencontre (2) et par où passeront les bus lignes LR203 et 204 (3) ?
Voirie_Besancon (2022-02-21 08:16:41+00:00): Merci pour ce retour et votre travail.
La voie verte sur le trottoir amont du pont sera bien supprimée et le trottoir retrouvera son usage pour les piétons uniquement.
Sur la voirie en zone de rencontre entre les accès au port fluvial et l'avenue Cusenier, seuls les véhicules du port fluvial sortiront sur cette voie., avec des cyclistes en contre sens. Pour l'entrée des véhicules du port fluvial, ils accèderont depuis l'avenue Cusenier par la plateforme de droite du tramway en site partagé.
Pour les bus LR 203 et 204, c'est une compétence de la Région. A priori, ils devraient passer par le pont Robert Schwint et l'avenue Cusenier. La piste cyclable bidirectionnelle en site propre vélo sera donc sur l'ancienne chaussée côté aval du pont entre le carrefour Hevétie Droz et l'accès au port fluvial.
Voirie_Besancon (2022-02-21 08:18:05+00:00): Une traversée piétonne et cycles est ajoutée entre la nouvelle piste cyclable et l'esplanade devant la banque avenue Helvétie.
Lejun (2022-02-21 16:02:14+00:00): C’est noté ! J’attends de voir l’évolution des travaux avant de regarder comment modifier les données
ququruzka (2022-02-18 14:03:54+00:00): будь ласка, вносьте зміни з меншим розміром bbox. В данному випадку, дуже важко відслідковувати зміни вандалів на території України. 
дякую
Tesla (2022-02-18 21:43:57+00:00): Поддерживаю
kate_rocketdata (2022-02-23 06:50:03+00:00): Добры дзень! 
Паспрабуем кантраляваць гэта.
Strubbl (2022-02-15 17:24:33+00:00): Hello Jürgen, 

welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for your contributions. Your first edits look very good. Have fun with further edits.

If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask me or create a thread in the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
The login data for the forum is the same as for OpenStreetMap.org. 

Alternatively you can find a lot of info in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

Best Regards,
Sven
RicoElectrico (2022-02-16 13:38:01+00:00): Dzięki za poprawę :)
woodpeck_repair (2022-02-15 10:38:37+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 116812501, 116812963, 116814550, 116814614, 116814868, 116815815, 116816988, 116827851, 116831331, 116857037.
JP213769 (2022-02-15 10:46:25+00:00): he is not a wandall he repairing this village
Mordechai23 (2022-02-21 15:54:55+00:00): co dodałeś w tym zestawie? I czemu ignorujesz komunikaty ID?
eggie (2022-02-15 11:28:11+00:00): Dag Elian,

Ik heb de specificatie  construction=residential verwijderd.
De weg is immers klaar. 
MVG
eggie
RicoElectrico (2022-02-16 13:50:45+00:00): Cześć, to przesunięcie adresu to pomyłka? https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/4538510429
ktostamzkadstam (2022-02-16 14:36:31+00:00): Tak, właśnie naprawiłem, dziękuję za zwrócenie mi uwagi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
woodpeck_repair (2022-02-15 12:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117433044 where the changeset comment is: remove continued vandalism from KMaper now as JP213769
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-04-21 01:56:56+00:00): a Avenida Conselheiro Fernando de Sousa nao tem separação fisica que divida os dois sentidos logo a avenida não devera ser mapeada com sentidos em vias separadas, peço que leia melhor aqui e respeite as regras de mapeamento https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padronização#Divis.C3.A3o_das_estradas_por_sentido
topolusitania (2022-04-21 10:41:14+00:00): A Avenida Conselheiro Fernando de Sousa tem uma separação fisica ao meio que divide os dois sentidos.  Verifica as imagens do Mapillary. Não é elevada, pode ser transposta facilmenre, mas existe um lancil no meio
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-04-22 01:13:05+00:00): a realidade mostra que não há uma clara separação das vias mas sim um lancil ao nível do piso e com a largura de uma linha, logo não se enquadra em nenhum dos exemplos descritos para a separação de vias em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padronização#Divis.C3.A3o_das_estradas_por_sentido
topolusitania (2022-04-22 10:01:22+00:00): Aqui a "linha" tem entre 1 a 5 cm de desnivel entre as duas faixas de alcatrão e tem 20 cm de largura...
Como especialista em nanomaping (vidé o que desenhaste no Terreiro do Paço) acho estranha esta tua nova posição. Ou os critérios mudam em função dos locais ? (Para que conste: Service, no lado Este do T Paço, onde desenhaste lancis transversais perpendiculares à via, e onde NÃO existe qualquer desnvel. apenas mudança de piso) Vidé fotos Mapillary da zona
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-04-24 00:36:25+00:00): Ao longo deste eixo o lancil tem diferentes posições, sendo que em boa parte do eixo se encontra ao nível do pavimento, tem tambe a mesma largura que a linha continua pintada que lhe dá seguimento nas suas pontas, receio que se encontre a um nível superior em areas onde o asfalto, pelo tempo, rachou e abateu, este lancil existe não para criar uma barreira física entre sentidos, como necessário e indicado nos padrões para mapear sentidos de forma separada, mas para marcar uma linha continua substituindo a tinta. Passarei pelo local para medir precisamente o caso. Agradeço a referencia a esse caso muito antigo e ja o tratei de corrigir, de facto os lancis não existem de forma expressiva e já fora retirados do OSM.
Supaplex (2022-02-16 02:23:50+00:00): It seems duplicated to this one
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7012171
Cine_flick (2022-02-17 04:38:22+00:00): Hi Supaplex, 

Thanks for flagging this. I've removed the park multi polygon which I added and have restored the data to the previous state, but I can see there’s an unclosed way error that still needs to be fixed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-02-15 11:37:37+00:00): Dag Frank...   We taggen bicycle=no als er een fietsverbod is middels bebording. Staat er geen bord dan bicycle=use_sidepath
Het effect is overigens hetzelfde. Het routeerde hier al niet voor fietsers,

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
woodpeck_repair (2022-02-15 12:00:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117433044 where the changeset comment is: remove continued vandalism from KMaper now as JP213769
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
woodpeck_repair (2022-02-15 12:00:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117433044 where the changeset comment is: remove continued vandalism from KMaper now as JP213769
highflyer74 (2022-02-15 19:49:50+00:00): Hier wurde lediglich die Adresse geändert, was aber die Praxis nicht "umzieht". Die Nodes verbleiben an ihrem Platz und die dort vorhandenen Dinge werden verändert. Am neuen Ort ist die Praxis jetzt gemappt und ich habe sie hier am Dobben rausgenommen (dabei beachten: wir löschen in OSM nur selten, in diesem Fall habe ich das https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix genutzt, um die alte Praxis zu taggen). Steht die alte Praxis jetzt leer, oder ist dort mittlerweile etwas anderes drin? Viele Grüße!
impiaaa (2022-02-15 19:40:05+00:00): Hello. Please make sure to add a changeset comment describing the changes you made, especially for changes this large. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2022-02-15 12:07:55+00:00): Beste paver.. Wanneer een restaurant verdwijnt.. dat kan..., maar laat dan het BAG adres intact. Nu missen er een aanral adresnodes.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117432032

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-15 12:26:58+00:00): Een aantal adressen hersteld..  
Lisa Wilhelmina samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-15 12:28:13+00:00): De rest lijkt me oke...
demon_box (2022-02-15 14:17:47+00:00): ciao Roberto, se è un sentiero cioè highway=path NON puoi mettere o lasciare il tag tracktype perchè questo (è piuttosto intuitivo...) va soltanto aggiunto ad highway=track
su un sentiero NON HA SENSO.
GRAZIE ;-))
BuonMapping!!
robertotempo (2022-02-15 16:54:05+00:00): Ciao! Forse era già così perché mi sono limitato a modificare da strada agricola a sentiero senza toccare i tag, solitamente non mi dà questi problemi, grazie comunque!
eggie (2022-02-15 12:35:25+00:00): Dag annuel..

Je kunt beter geen wegen doorverbinden. Dat is niet echt nodig en geeft vaak problemen wanneer er routerelaties over lopen.
Die zijn dan beschadigd.  Even iets om in het achterhoofd te houden. 
Hier wat leesvoer hoe editor iD werkt.
basisbewerkingen iD 

https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/#basisbewerkingen-met-id 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-15 12:39:36+00:00): Wanneer je de lijnelementen selecteert en rechtermuis klikt dan krijg je een keuzemenu.
Ik gebruik zelf editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

Een aanrader.
mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-02-15 12:53:34+00:00): Beide lijnelementen selecteren en dan sneltoets C
Hier kan het wel, want er loopt geen routerelatie. 
Maar nodig is het niet.
annuel (2022-02-15 13:32:59+00:00): Helder, dank voor alle tips. Ik denk dat ik zeker JOSM ga proberen, ook al is de learning curve stijler, het zal zich uiteindelijk wel terugbetalen.
woodpeck_repair (2022-02-15 12:00:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117430304, 117430749, 117431044, 117431529, 117431594, 117431978, 117432284.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-15 12:25:31+00:00): note: some of edits could be correct but as some blatant lies were spotted and this was block evading account, everything was reverted
user_5359 (2022-02-16 16:42:30+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Für eine bessere Beschreibung Deines Objektes bitte mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house ansehen.