piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flohoff (2016-04-26 10:38:37+00:00): Hi,
du hast in diesem Changeset an der Hüttruper Straße den landuse überarbeitet und an die Straße geklebt. Das ist "bad style". Flächen und Wege sollten keine Nodes teilen. Wege markieren nur die Mitte. Flächen wirklich deren ausdehung. Der Landuse geht ja nicht bis zur mitte der Straße.

Flo
JJJWegdam (2016-04-25 21:48:23+00:00): Beste rhaan,
dank voor het herstellen van de niet volgens plan aangelegde paden. Ik vroeg me af of u voor way 413095475 nog iets verder zou kunnen specificeren welk deel van het pad een brug is, als u dit niet al van plan was. Bvd http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413095475
xmd5a (2016-05-17 09:38:53+00:00): Зачем вы добавили тег bridge=yes на всю дорогу?
Supaplex (2016-04-26 08:52:23+00:00): 不畫做土城機廠內的軌道嗎XDD
SomeoneElse (2016-05-14 22:39:15+00:00): Hi,
I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80537943 should be "sidewalk=both"?
Cheers,
Andy
dudone (2016-05-15 19:04:06+00:00): Hi 
Typo due to caps lock.  Now fixed,
Regards
Dudley
chillly (2016-04-28 17:09:48+00:00): I don't believe that in OSM the road you have added is a residential road, I believe it is a service road (highway=service).
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 17:48:19+00:00): I was in this place, there is a good road with many houses arround.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-16 07:53:32+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1269722 ?
chillly (2016-04-28 17:12:08+00:00): You have added a building and added a name field to it. We use name=* to add a business name (such as a shop name) not the address name. For that we use addr:housename=*.  

If Willow Garth is a farm (I'd need to visit to check) we do it differently as a farm often has multiple buildings. If that case we draw the outline of the farmyard, tag it as landuse=farmyard and add the name=* to the farmyard, not individual buildings.
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 17:53:46+00:00): http://www.carehome.co.uk/carehome.cfm/searchazref/10004015WILB
chillly (2016-04-28 17:56:49+00:00): OK, tag it as a care home then. The road to it will likely be defined in OSM as a service road.
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 18:19:53+00:00): From Wiki:Tag:highway=service Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc.
If I understand right, only for service used, but not how driveway.
chillly (2016-04-28 18:21:52+00:00): highway=service, but not the descriptor service=driveway. 

Be careful with the wiki, some stuff gets edited to be bonkers, but I agree with that description.
chillly (2016-04-28 18:23:15+00:00): If a building is made of right angled corners, you can press Q when the building is selected in the editor and that 'squares up' the building.
joost schouppe (2016-06-10 09:52:00+00:00): je kan eventueel operator=skalaar toevoegen, en zelfs operator:website=hun url ; als die bestaat
joost schouppe (2016-06-10 09:50:11+00:00): Met een punt met enkel een naam kom je niet ver. Wellicht is deze tag interessant: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre
chillly (2016-04-28 17:15:11+00:00): I think one of the legs you have added is too long as it include the private driveway of a house. Showing the two legs is a good idea.
chillly (2016-04-28 17:16:54+00:00): If this is a residential road (it could be) it needs the name adding too. Residentail roads almost always have a name in England. In this case I would expect to be The Birches.
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 17:57:06+00:00): done
chillly (2016-04-28 17:19:33+00:00): It would help if you used a bit more expressive changeset comments. Repeating the same one ("Road") is not helpful for reviews and won't help you much if you look back at your edits. It is very helpful that you make small changes in each changeset, especially as you start out.
chillly (2016-04-28 17:21:13+00:00): The 'Y' ending to the road is good to add, but I believe you have made it too long, including some shared driveways at each end which are not part of the residential road.
chillly (2016-04-28 17:24:20+00:00): In this edit you seem to have extended the residential road into private driveways. A turning circle might be a better solution, though I would need to survey to check.
chillly (2016-04-28 17:25:43+00:00): You are not adding names to residential road extensions. You are extending the residential roads into private driveways.
chillly (2016-04-28 17:28:19+00:00): The roadway to the North looks like a service road to me. If it really is a residential road it needs a name. The extension you have added to Cedar Close is too long, it should not include private driveways. It also needs a name.
chillly (2016-04-28 17:36:39+00:00): The road you have added is a service road (highway=service)
Commodoortje (2016-04-29 03:05:32+00:00): Beetje hulp verleend.
Blokker inmiddels overgezet naar van Ghentstraat 10
en verwijderd op Molenstraat 14
chillly (2016-04-28 17:37:56+00:00): The roads you have added look to be service roads to me (highway=service).
joost schouppe (2016-06-10 09:48:34+00:00): Hoi Wouter, je kan de begraafplaats nog verrijken met de beschermingsgegevens; zie voorbeeld: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35766257#map=19/50.73724/4.26162
Gebruiker escada is Vlaams specialist in hoe je dit kan mappen. En het ziet er dan allemaal geweldig uit op http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/translate/en/index-en.html
chillly (2016-04-28 17:38:34+00:00): The road you have added is a service road
Commodoortje (2016-04-29 03:09:11+00:00): Beetje hulp verleend.
Scapino Twello gegevens verwijderd uit OSM ivm sluiting.
bubix (2016-04-26 10:32:27+00:00): Direi che è ok! L'importante è mapparlo il civico così è raggiungibile da tutti!
geri-oc (2016-06-24 12:34:11+00:00): siehe Forum:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54954

ich finde es nicht richtig, short_name oder wikipedia in die Relation - die Vereinte Weißeritz lässt sich auch aus der Datenbank ableiten, wenn sie in einzelnen Elementen besteht. Relationen sollten für spezielle Zwecke erstellt werden. OSM sollte nach den Prinzip einfach-detailiert-speziell-kompliziert aufgebaut sein.
sommerluk (2016-06-20 14:15:22+00:00): Why? This is a new motorway that has been constructed a year and a half ago, and it has no traffic signals and no crossroads. It should definativly not have the same road type as Bd. VGE with all its intersections, traffic signals (and taxis that try to turn at half way between two crossroads).
SomeoneElse (2016-05-05 19:02:22+00:00): Thanks for fixing this.  It's also my recollection from when I was last there that 395 here isn't a motorway.  For info, the mapper who changed it to one has been asked to stop making "dubious edits" in the past (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/892).
If you see more problems please do fix them (for which thanks in advance!) and if you'd like the DWG to get involved drop a mail to data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
Achoin (2016-04-26 10:59:19+00:00): "Парусник с подсветкой" Вы перенесли в description. Таки в name хотя бы "Парусник" нужно оставить. А то достопримечательность в виде простой звездочки на карте, как-то не привлекает.
Achoin (2016-04-26 14:52:56+00:00): Кстати, tourism=attraction это не есть атракционы (карусели и все такое) - это любое место которое может быть интересно туристу см. "достопримечательность". Для обозначения атракионов используется отдельный ключ - attraction=* где вместо *  пишется знаение соответствующее типу атракциона. 
Отсюда возникает вопрос - можно ли использовать совместно 2 тега 
tourism=attraction и tourism=artwork; что могло бы означать достопримечательность и произведение искусства. а может оно и ненадо.
Так же можно наверняка использовать tourism=attraction + attraction=carousel... вроде и достопримечательность и карусели. надо подумать
VlIvYur (2016-04-30 20:08:27+00:00): Я ни разу не слышал названия этого парусника, а значит не могу это в name занести, на крайний случай это loc_name
Я не нашёл как обозначать аттракционы, везде они были только как tourism=attraction и не видел этого пропозала http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:attraction из которого следует что attraction=* не используется совместно с tourism=attraction, т.к. аттракционы это часть чего-то большего (theme_park). Достопримечательностью ещё можно было б назвать самое большое колесо за Полярным кругом, но все остальные - точно нет
VlIvYur (2016-04-30 20:12:21+00:00): Я бы не стал смешивать attraction и artwork. В моём понимании artwork это скульптуры, статуи, фрески, граффити что уже довольно сильный attraction для меня. А вот attraction это что-то, что не попадает под эту категорию, но может быть интересным/забавным
chillly (2016-04-28 17:44:03+00:00): Changing unclassified roads to residential roads may be right, but roads that are residential have houses beside them, not just any buildings.
chillly (2016-04-28 17:45:55+00:00): This looks like an access road to a farm or large house. That will be a service road not a residential
Derick Rethans (2016-04-26 08:45:09+00:00): Hi!

That changeset comment was misleading. It's nowhere near the Sports Centre! :-)

I've also tagged this new place as a shop, as without it, it won't show up on the map.

Let me know if you have any questions.

cheers,
Derick
Your Friendly Local Mapper
Deanna Earley (2016-04-26 10:40:39+00:00): The old names have now been redacted too.
JeopardyTempest (2016-05-01 20:27:57+00:00): Hi GoWestTravel, looks like you've made a lot of useful edits to our area, and just had a couple questions about them:

The name changes... are you basing this upon a database from your work, searches, personal experience\surveying, are they semi\fully automated, or something else?

Also wondered if you had more input into the choice of tagging multiple buildings of a hotel each with the name.  Seems more reasonable to me, but then makes maps a mess.  And while we don't tag to the editor, seems perhaps best to avoid a messy map.  I haven't tried relations before for them, like are used with schools and some other places... do they perhaps offer something better?  You seem, based upon your wide array of edits, to spend a lot of time of this, so perhaps you've come across the discussions better.

Appreciate your feedback, thanks :-)
GoWestTravel (2016-05-01 21:14:07+00:00): Hi JeopardyTempest,

thank you for your reaction. I truly hope the hotels I added are useful to the community. I found out many cities did not have complete and accurate hotel information and also notices hotels can be hard to fond when only the name of the chain was mentioned while having several hotels of that chain in a certain area. I found the extended name information in a work database which contain most hotels chains.

I was not aware of the fact that the combination of buildings would make a mess. Combining the buildings makes sense to me and I've checked the result early into my operation. I just saw the name of the hotel being shown over a larger area. But by no means do want to make a mess!

I did spend the last two months most if my time adding hotels to over 360 smaller and larger cities manually. But I'm afraid I can't help you much further with the discussion. But feel free to point out where discussions are held, I'll be happy to participate! I do follow the OSM subreddit.

And I'm always eager to learn how to do a better job, also with OSM. So please keep your comments coming in!

Thanks,

Hans
JeopardyTempest (2016-05-02 00:43:39+00:00): Hi Hans,

I certainly agree with you that there's heavy need for more complete\useful business names... been trying to update them a bit myself around Orlando, but it's certainly daunting.
My main question about the source of your database then aims at the key question... do you have direct permission from the makers of the db to use it for this?  I know OSM is big on being careful with copyrights, and I can support that.  Can be frustrating when the information is out there, and you want to use it, but really shouldn't.  I've actually thought for a while about going through the website of larger businesses and using their own locations directory to update OSM... but as far as I understand it, even for that we'd need to get permission from each company before using it.


In regards to the multiple buildings, I'm sorry, I shouldn't really say "mess".  Just that when you zoom in, it displays the name in numerous places [on Open Street Maps standard map at least] (for each separate building), and so it might lead to confusion when visually looking at maps.  Plus I'd think (once Nominatim processes the locations) it'd have multiple found results.

I'd seen others changing it to single location instead of multiple building, and seen how that perhaps looked better (even while having definite shortcomings of not connecting the places), so I'd started doing it that way.

I'd sort of think the address might best point to the main building as that's where you'd check-in.  But then, that's still imperfect if you're delivering pizzas or something.  But unless one has local knowledge, hard to map out the room numbers of separate buildings or such.

Unfortunately I don't really know any more than you do about discussions on such.  I came across https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/29613/how-to-tag-a-business-with-multiple-buildings which shed some thoughts.  Perhaps I should ask a question on the Tagging OSM list?  I haven't followed Reddit, is it well followed?  If so, it might be better than the obscure lists they have, but those are the only things I have read.

Really am glad to see you working on that so much, it seems there's a bit of this and a bit of that with OSM, and it'd be nice to something more full and mostly complete come about.  If everything is good with the licensing, perhaps I can even be of help a bit, take on a bit of the work load with perhaps some of the more obscure roadside motels or such.

Regardless, thanks for the very friendly reply, and hopefully we can both come to a better understanding of works best for multi-building units and help others to so there is at least a little consistency and we're not just all taking our time changing them back and forth between the two methods!

To God be any glory,
Thanks again,
Shane
GoWestTravel (2016-05-03 07:38:53+00:00): Hi Shane,

Thank you for getting back to me in such great detail!

I don't have direct permission to use the names from a database. But after I discovered that these names are used everywhere, it seemed to me that these are these names being used. If you check the website of let's say Super 8, you'll find that same name. TripAdvisor, same thing, Google mostly the same. I think if I check other sources, it will be the same name. I know about copyright issues and would not just start adding names if they weren't more generic than anything else. The companies use these themselves on their websites and in my book this means that this is what they want their hotels to be called. So I really feel I didn't overstep any borders by the use of the business names.

You convinced me not to combine the different buildings anymore and I'm sorry if that made OSM a little less clear on the places that I did do that. Fortunately it's not too many, but I'll stick to what I perceive the main building from now on. I'm pretty sure the pizza guy will still know his way around ;)

I'm not following most discussions on Reddit, but I do check it every now and then to see if there's anything new. But if there's other platforms I really should follow, please let me know! Like I said, I love to learn more.

Once again thank you and good luck mapping. I hope I answered your question and I look forward to an even better OSM experience for all!

Thanks,

Hans
chillly (2016-04-28 17:48:45+00:00): You have tagged a service road to the petrol station as a driveway (service=driveway). This is for private driveways to houses, not an access road in a petrol station
chillly (2016-04-28 16:06:13+00:00): We always add farm names to the landuse area, not individual buildings, unless the building has a name different to the farm. Postcodes need to be structured correctly, i.e. with a space in the right place.
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 17:32:22+00:00): The problem with field for farm is - all satnav who use OpenStreetMaps not see this names of farm and result is missing place in satnav.
chillly (2016-04-28 17:35:23+00:00): We do not tag for a satnav, we tag facts. If the satnav is wrong then the way it uses OSM data should be changed. This is a fundamental principal of OSM. The satnav I use (with OSM data in it) display farms as I have described perfectly.
smaprs (2016-04-26 00:59:52+00:00): Hi, which consistencies are you considering? I guess at least roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197282540 should be at least tertiary, due to it's importance, probably secondary as it was tagged. It's the main road to heavy populated areas. According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa.
IndianaJones737 (2016-04-26 20:15:40+00:00): That was my mistake. You are definitely correct there, so I changed it back to secondary. Thanks
chillly (2016-04-28 16:02:52+00:00): The short spurs off Brazill St. are footways. They are not pedestrian. What are the names? Have you visited the site? Please don't add pedestrian to this kind of way.
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 17:25:01+00:00): This is Avenue. My vision is better used Pedestrian street because is a street-avenue. If that was only footways then you cant drive in with cycles, but on pedestrian streets you can do that, right?!
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 17:25:20+00:00): And names will be soon!
chillly (2016-04-28 17:32:17+00:00): No. In OSM in the UK a pedestrian street is a vehicle road that has been closed to traffic and is only now open to pedestrian. An example would be King Edward street in Hull or Prestongate in Hessle. The paths you added are not wide enough for a vehicle, so a highway= footway not a highway=pedestrian.
Derick Rethans (2016-04-26 08:47:35+00:00): Is this tree really in the middle of the road? I would guess it's on the North side, but can check later in my lunch break.
chillly (2016-04-28 16:00:49+00:00): I have reverted this edit. The footpaths are not pedestrian roads. Please don't make any more changes like this without discussing it first. The revert is changeset  38956065
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 17:28:07+00:00): Ok mate!
Derick Rethans (2016-04-26 08:49:32+00:00): Charteris Sports Centre was already mapped as a way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60667948#map=19/51.53861/-0.19859

I saw you added data there, so no need to have this extra node as well. I've removed it.
Geography Canada (2016-04-25 23:02:29+00:00): "wod"?
malcolmh (2016-04-26 21:55:57+00:00): Please do not destroy recent on-the-ground surveys with out-of-date aerial photos.
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 17:27:03+00:00): Sorry about that! In future I will be more carreful!
Thank you for understanding!
chillly (2016-04-28 15:55:41+00:00): Are you sure that is a residential road? Have you visited it to confirm this? It looked to me to be an access road similar to a shared driveway. that would be a service road in OSM.
Eugene13 (2016-04-28 17:17:19+00:00): I hope you seen - I removed some Greenwich park sleeve, that doesn't exist.
About The Pines - all road is in good condition with asphalt. Residents of The Pines use this road every day :)
muralito (2016-04-26 03:04:35+00:00): Hola.

¿y si en vez de dudar tratas de asegurarte que no lo sea? :-)

Si estas empezando te recomiendo hacer cambios mas chicos hasta que le agarres la mano y no tengas dudas...
AgusQui (2016-05-02 22:56:27+00:00): JKneeA las líneas de bondis que no existan borralas por favor.
JKneeA (2016-05-03 05:35:58+00:00):  No tengo problema en sacarlas ya que conozco extensivamente el transporte público; pero hace muy poco entré, por lo que no sabría como encontrarlas para removerlas. Adicionalmente me gustaría preguntar si hay una forma de cambiar el tamaño a las calles, ya que hay calles de 6 vías que se ven muy pequeñas en el mapa y eso complica la forma de hacer las intersecciones con otras calles.
AgusQui (2016-05-03 14:15:49+00:00): Si querés mejorar los bondis buenisimo, en esta ciudad están muy desactualizados, para eso te conviene usar el editor JOSM. 
A vías te referís a los carriles? Eso se agrega a la vía (así llamamos a las líneas) con la etiqueta lanes=*, por ahora no hay render que refleje el ancho real de las calles. 
Miraste nuestra wiki? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Argentina
Si entras a nuestro grupo de Telegram te podemos ir explicando mejor todas tus dudas: https://telegram.me/osm_ar
muralito (2016-05-03 18:50:07+00:00): Agus, mira que los "lanes" y los "turn:lanes" si bien no son mostrados por ahora en el mapa web, si son usados por los ruteadores para hacerte colocar en el carril correcto.

En cuanto a que se vean mas grandes,  mas detalle de la realidad, es algo que se propuso, que ademas de la parte funcional de la calle que se dibuja ahora, se dibujen tambien los contornos, asi seria una representacion mas realista, pero no se en que quedo.
AgusQui (2016-05-04 00:56:59+00:00): Cierto! Olvidé mencionarlo, aunque no se vean, la información de la cantidad de carriles y cuáles se usan para girar es usada por la mayoría de los ruteadores!
zstadler (2016-04-27 18:14:45+00:00): Thanks for adding green colour to way 
146820042 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146820042)
Are you sure that it should all be green, or just until the junction with Ein Hatzeva field school?

If needed, you can cut a way in two and mark just the part that needs to change.
See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=21178
R0bst3r (2016-04-28 14:22:57+00:00): Hi Clarke22,

you've added a tag "cuisinge" (cuisine?) to a supermarket. Normally it is only added to a restaurant or sth similar. Can you improve that?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4148069421

Cheers, R0bst3r
rab (2016-04-26 18:09:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413703161
building=yes - the building not the plot.
Please add some names to roads and places. Keep on mapping. Zimbabwe Map needs more local knowledge
user_5359 (2016-04-26 19:13:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The value of the keys buildings:levels means the number of levels not the school grades (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels). If you want to notice the different height of building parts, please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part .
tarta (2016-04-26 11:14:21+00:00): Danrley, quando você for criar uma rua, lembre que é preciso conectar essa rua a outra, você precisa clicar em cima da outra via para que elas possam estar ligadas, e não somente criar o nó proximo da rua em questão.
qualquer dúvida pode manter contato
Jose Romero (2016-04-26 03:33:41+00:00): Área  Terminada
user_5359 (2016-04-26 19:14:13+00:00): Hello again. Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club for this node.
pdxrider (2016-04-26 04:35:40+00:00): my apologies for my past couple of edits. I have accidentally clicked the save button instead of cancel. that's why a wrong changeset comment is used here.
SK53 (2016-04-28 14:34:00+00:00): Don't worry too much about this: everyone copies the old changeset comments from time to time (or accidentally changes the c/s comments w/o saving each piece of work). It's certainly useful to do what you have done to clarify comments, but not essential.
maraf24 (2016-04-26 21:09:13+00:00): Rondo z przejezdną wyspą centralna tagujemy jako highway=mini_roundabout.
Szczególnie takie małe jak to.
Robin007 (2016-04-26 22:10:01+00:00): Zatem nie wiem, czy to na Pionierów/Cedrowa też nie wymaga zmiany?

PS.
Tutaj poprawiłem wg. wskazania.
maraf24 (2016-04-26 21:01:11+00:00): Nie ma tu żadnego urzędu:)
Usunąłem.
R0bst3r (2016-04-28 14:37:05+00:00): Hallo Lokalfuerst,

keine Ahnung was ein Kalibrierungspunkt ist, aber in deinem Key steckt auf jeden Fall noch ein Schreibfehler ;)

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4148345789

Grüße, R0bst3r
FTA (2016-04-26 15:51:30+00:00): Hi, where is this data coming from?