piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 23:31:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103298014, 103298513 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
~Jhellico (2021-04-09 09:48:40+00:00): Точка містить в адресі номер будинку 44, а розміщена на полігоні буднику з номером 46. Невірна адреса чи розміщення?
DanGlover (2021-04-10 15:28:40+00:00): Hi CalumM - Post box 119 should be the one further south at the Post Office - but it's possible it has been labelled wrongly. Also does it not show the  district (PH13 ?) on the label?
CalumM (2021-04-10 21:36:00+00:00): Hi DanGlover, I have now changed this to the correct label.  Thanks for the help
rskedgell (2021-04-11 06:54:56+00:00): With the exception of highway=path objects, that's not what you're doing.

A highway=footway does not have implicit access=yes, it has an implicit access of foot=yes (so needs an explicit foot=designated on a public footpath). All adding a redundant access=no tag does is cause the path to be rendered in grey. This is unhelpful.
mueschel (2021-04-10 15:20:18+00:00): Please check this relation, something went wrong with the url tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12546589
eggie (2021-04-10 15:29:59+00:00): Hi mueschel..  The tagging was from the former mapper. 
It was landuse=construction
I'm mapping here for three days now  and removed all the information from the mp except the natural =water with specification and the name of the area.
Thanks for the hint.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-04-10 15:40:14+00:00): former changeset
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88369478

It's okay now..
Greetz
eggie
joost schouppe (2021-05-05 12:43:16+00:00): Hoi Janiek,
Wat heb je hier precies willen toevoegen? Ik neem aan dat er geen religieus winkeltje genaamd "Grot" is :)
Becky Candy (2021-04-21 10:42:15+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102464489
philippec (2021-04-08 09:11:18+00:00): Wetteren Safti aed,
indoor ? , mapillary ?
Erin76 (2021-04-08 10:32:39+00:00): buiten, naast de ingang, geen foto van gemaakt
philippec (2021-04-08 10:36:44+00:00): Ik veronderstel dat de schuifpoort na de uren sluit.  Dus access=customer ?
philippec (2021-04-11 08:16:28+00:00): Ik doe het dan maar zelf.
philippec (2021-04-11 08:19:01+00:00): Het kan, maar het is wel zeldzaam dat een aed anderhalve meter van de muur van een winkel staat.
Erin76 (2021-04-11 08:23:01+00:00): Dag philippe, ik heb niet altijd tijd :-) De aed hangt aan de muur. De poort sluit inderdaad na openningstijd. Bedankt voor de ondersteuning
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 23:31:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103298014, 103298513 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-07 11:44:48+00:00): Bonjour, 
Je crains qu'il n'y ai un  soucis dans les horaires d'ouverture affichés.
Ils ne sont pas correspondants entre le descriptif et le tag "opening_hours", de plus, cela n'est pas utile de mentionner l'information deux fois...
Merci, 
#CDT40
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102465136
Hélène OT La Vallée du Kiwi (2021-04-07 12:01:19+00:00): Bonjour Delphine, 
je me suis posée la question au niveau des horaires parce que ce ne sont pas les mêmes. Il y a ceux du guichet (pour avoir un interlocuteur si besoin d'infos non disponibles en ligne) et ceux d'ouverture de la gare, raison pour laquelle j'ai mentionné les 2. À voir du coup si on les conserve.
Merci.
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-07 12:37:53+00:00): Bonjour Hélène, 
Je comprend mieux pourquoi les deux sont différents. 
Cela peut être intéressant dans ce cas de le mentionner même si je pense que la carto ne fera remonter que les horaires du tag "opening_hours". 
A bientôt.
Delphine
flierfy (2021-04-10 16:05:19+00:00): Hello,
you made this changeset, which left the edited area in rather messy condition. I don't know what you intended by this. But I do know that this needs to be corrected. It would be kind of you, if you would take on this task yourself.
With kind regards, Stephan
user_2066394 (2021-04-08 21:30:16+00:00): Was genau?
Melkor03 (2021-04-09 05:23:00+00:00): Weg nach Satellitenbild ausgerichtet anstatt GPS-Track
rik_ (2021-04-08 05:43:38+00:00): Hallo,

du hast das Segment des Fuß-/Radwegs von der Rettungswache Pätz bis zum Beginn der Ortslage mit `surface=asphalt` versehen. Dort liegen ab Höhe Rettungswache aber Pflastersteine. Kannst du das bitte korrigieren?

(Ich habe ein paar Stichproben deiner letzten Änderungen angeschaut und dabei einige falsche und auch einige überflüssige Dinge gesehen. Da du erst seit zwei Tagen dabei bist, wäre es vielleicht keine schlechte Idee, wenn du dir zuerst die Dokumentation z. B. im OpenStreetMap-Wiki anschaust bevor du großflächig falsche oder unsinnige Änderungen an den Kartendaten vornimmst). 

Das ist jetzt nicht böse gemeint – ich persönlich freue mich über jede Person die mithelfen möchte OpenStreetMap zu verbessern – aber gerade zum Anfang bietet es sich an, erst mal "zu schauen wie der Hase läuft" und vielleicht kleinere Änderungen abzusenden und diese vielleicht auch kurz von jemandem prüfen zu lassen.

Danke und viele Grüße
elgolfo (2021-04-10 08:14:26+00:00): Hallo Günthi,

willkommen bei OSM.
Wie rik_ schon schrieb, sind die ersten Schritte bei OSM nicht ganz intuitiv. Für Einsteiger empfehlen sich zwei Tutorials, um einen groben Überblick zu bekommen:
* https://learnosm.org/de/beginner/
* https://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße
Moritz
Günthi (2021-04-10 08:22:04+00:00): Danke für eure Hinweise.
Werde mich damit auseinandersetzen. 
Gruß 
Günthi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 10:12:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103130656 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
patpol4 (2021-10-27 07:40:11+00:00): Mam wątpliwości co do wiarygodności nazwy tego przybytku.
puchaczowsky (2021-10-29 10:41:21+00:00): odpowiedzi i tak raczej nie otrzymasz, do usunięcia
timmito (2021-04-07 14:08:14+00:00): Hallo Pakun, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Kleiner Hinweis: name ist nur der Name. Sumpf ist in diesem Fall eher eine Beschreibung, also description, und kein Name. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
Pakun (2021-04-08 06:22:37+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweiß.
Ich habe es geändert.
Keima (2021-04-08 19:32:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Il est d'usage de faire attention à la casse pour le nommage, ici je pense que cela doit probablement être "Rue de la Vallée" par exemple.

Cordialement,
ash_win (2021-04-09 08:28:37+00:00): Hi yinongsong,
Aligned residential road as it was overlapping with other road segment and changed classification from residential to foot way as it is passing through farm land,Kindly check with way 927089831 way 427212925,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102621727
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102466641
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 10:12:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103130656 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
rthik007 (2021-04-09 09:27:38+00:00): Hi phchu,
Fixed the alignment as ways are overlapping with one another.
Kindly check with way 927090810,
way 927093493,way 927093494
way 927093490.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102628040.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102467444
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
ash_win (2021-04-09 07:55:14+00:00): Hi jackwu_M,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road.Kindly check with way 427213205
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102619509
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102467715
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
yaghootweb (2021-04-07 09:29:26+00:00): OK
rik_ (2021-04-08 05:31:29+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier den Belag der Straße zwischen Krummensee und Schenkendorf auf `asphalt` geändert.[1] Das ist falsch, hier liegt weiterhin Kopfsteinpflaster. 

Kannst du das bitte reparieren?

Danke und viele Grüße

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23417299
m902 (2021-05-11 15:58:11+00:00): Hi, I see you have marked Gillingham Cemetery as disused. I don't believe that to be true. Could I ask you to check please, and update if necessary? Thanks.
Dukie (2021-05-11 17:32:21+00:00): Yes it is disused all grave markers moved to the perimeter awl, some selective reburials elsewhere some time ago. No more interments allowed at the site and is now a town park. The cemetery chapel is a council gardening tools store. I live five minutes from the park. It is disused no amendment needed.
Dukie (2021-05-11 17:33:10+00:00): Sorry wall not awl, predictive text the curse of the age.
Dukie (2021-05-11 17:34:27+00:00): Sorry my mistake will amend.
m902 (2021-05-11 21:00:05+00:00): Thanks!
Keima (2021-04-08 19:39:18+00:00): Bonjour,

Il est d'usage d'éviter de tout écrire en majuscule, même si sur l'enseigne c'est écrit ainsi. Ici je pense que "MT27 Performance" serait plus adapté par exemple.

Ensuite l'adresse se divise en plusieurs section. On utilise "addr:street" uniquement pour le nom de la rue par exemple, pas pour le numéro ou pour la ville. Ici cela devrait être "addr:street=Rue de la Vallée" + "addr:housenumber=1" + "addr:city=Andard" + "addr:postcode=49800". Néanmoins on peut se passer de "city" et "postcode" dans quasiment tous les cas, la position géographique du bâtiment suffit à savoir dans quelle ville et code postale il se trouve.

N'hésitez pas à me contacter si vous ne comprenez pas quelque chose et vous voulez plus de détail.
Cordialement,
pio2_122 (2021-04-07 09:34:12+00:00): Wycofane: błędna zmiana nazwy ronda + błędne rozrysowanie dróg, które było prawidłowo oznaczone tagiem highway=mini_roundabout(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102468001
maciek-szn (2021-04-07 10:04:33+00:00): Skąd wziąłeś nazwę ronda "Rondo Majowe"? Czyżby z Google Maps? Bo tak się składa, że ta nazwa jest błędna.
Chivos (2021-04-08 11:10:00+00:00): Bonjour capacapa3333,
J'ai vu que vous avez créé ou modifié plusieurs noeuds pour du street art. J'ai plusieurs remarques/questions :
- Qu'est ce que le PAXXX ? une référence ?
- Le tag name doit être utilisé pour le nom de l’œuvre, il n'est pas adapté pour décrire la position (il doit y avoir un tag description)
capacapa3333 (2021-04-08 11:33:28+00:00): Bonjour Chivos,

en effet, je répertorie les Invaders (mosaïques posées par un artiste du nom d'Invader, il y en a 1400 à Paris)! Le PAXXX correspond à la référence de l'invader, on peut trouver la liste des invaders sur ce site : https://www.unoeilquitraine.fr/?page_id=442

Je me sers du tag name pour pouvoir retrouver la forme de l'Invader une fois sur place.
Chivos (2021-04-21 11:38:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la réponse, déoslé pour mon retour tardif.
Questions diverses : est-ce que vous avez l'autorisation de saisir ces données dans Openstreetmap, d'un point de vue compatibilité des licences ?
Le tag name n'est pas adapté, c'est plutôt un tag ref contenant le PAXXX qu'il faudrait employer, en plus de préciser la source des données.
Et pour la description, il faut mettre en place plutôt un tag note.
Keima (2021-04-08 19:40:11+00:00): Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102467949 pour commentaire sur l'adressage.
rthik007 (2021-04-09 09:02:08+00:00): Hi ryansu,
Duplicate road WAY: 927096171 was created. Later it was fixed by other user  Osterskaer 
Kindly refer to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102538596
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102468126
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:00:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119099 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4905 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-19 00:11:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103157071 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
hauke-stieler (2021-04-16 21:42:43+00:00): Hi,

bei Telefonnummern bitte das korrekte internationale Format "+49 40 123 ..." verwenden, dein Wert hier war "Tel.: 040 - 29823278" und damit nicht dem Wiki entsprechend.
Bei Öffnungszeiten ebenfalls das Format wie im Wiki nutzen, welches englische Wochentage angibt. Also statt "Di-Sa" entsprechend "Tu-Sa" usw.

Grüße
Hauke
rthik007 (2021-04-09 08:03:39+00:00): Hi ryansu,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with footway WAY: 148170884
Kindly refer to 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102619994.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102468607
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:00:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119099 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4905 .
Keima (2021-04-08 19:45:44+00:00): Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102467949 pour un commentaire sur l'adressage. 

Sinon vous semblez ajouter des bâtiments d'entreprises. Est-ce des bâtiments de ventes ouverts au publique? Est-ce des usines? Vous pouvez l'indiquer avec des tags correspondant afin de permettre l'utilisation automatique de ces données. Je vous invite à visiter cette page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89l%C3%A9ments_cartographiques qui est une mine d'or pour se retrouver parmi toutes les possibilités.

Si vous avez un doute n'hésitez pas à me décrire ce qui est produit/vendu et me dire ce que vous souhaiteriez mettre et je vous ferait un retour.

Cordialement,
rik_ (2021-04-08 05:23:05+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier ein Segment der Straße mit `foot=no` getaggt. Das ist nicht in Einklang mit der Beschilderung vor Ort. 

Die Straße an dieser Stelle ist nicht für Fußgänger verboten - zumindest war sie das gestern nicht als ich hier langgefahren bin.

Kannst du das bitte in den Daten korrigieren?

Danke und viele Grüße
hauke-stieler (2021-04-16 21:46:53+00:00): Hi,

statt den langen Namen in die description und die Abkürzung in den Namen zu packen, passt hier glaube ich short_name=EXIL besser und dann name="Experimentelles interdisziplinäres Labor". Der tag description ist wirklich für Dinge da, die man sonst nicht wirklich taggen kann, z.B. "description=ehem. Wohnhaus Fritz Schumacher".

Grüße
Hauke
rthik007 (2021-04-09 07:49:28+00:00): Hi pengwaigoh,
Buildings are connected to residential road WAY: 23991870, later it was fixed by other user. Kindly refr to 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102517222
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102468925
highflyer74 (2021-04-08 05:12:40+00:00): Moin!

Heisst dieser Laden wirklich "Kleiner Museumsladen an der Kasse" oder die Karte "Museumskarte"? Ich bezweifle das ein stark. Bitte beachte, dass wir name=* nur für Eigennamen verwenden und NICHT für Beschreibungen eines Objekts. Wenn etwas also keinen Namen hat, einfach weglassen. Danke!

Bitte lies Dir die untenstehenden Links durch, damit Du verstehst, wie wir Daten in OSM erfassen.
 
Viele Grüße!

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
saul-goodman (2021-04-08 15:57:23+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-21 02:10:22+00:00): 请临朐的编辑者不要随便拆分青州的边界线段，这个边界是特意和已有的任何图征都不交叠不共用的如果你添加的是临朐的街道之间的界线，请按照规范标记，如果是代表河流中线，就把弥河截了接上去直接写一个行政界限， 又不说明是什么的界限，是什么意思？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102469539
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:00:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119099 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4905 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:00:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119099 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4905 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 23:30:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103298014, 103298513 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
rthik007 (2021-04-09 07:33:52+00:00): Hi phchu,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road WAY: 151457190.
Kindly refer to 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102615965.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102470095
adamsc (2021-11-18 23:16:45+00:00): Cześć,
Czy w okolicach przecięcia tych linii:
157057186
766777059
był jakiś remont/zmiany względem tego co widać na podkładzie z Geoportalu?
Jeżeli nie to ten fragment polnej drogi od węzła 7161274170 do 7161273951 nie powinien być oznaczony jako residential - tylko track z grade 4 albo 5.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-08 23:57:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106060517 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
bergaufsee (2021-04-07 17:50:27+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap,
gibt es einen Grund für die hier gemachten Änderungen, speziell für das massenhafte Löschen von Adressdaten in diesem Bereich? Sollte das ein unbewusster Anfängerfehler sein, sei dir bitte im Klaren dass du hier direkt in einer Live Datenbank arbeitest und Änderungen sofort für alle wirksam werden. Ich werde diesen Änderungssatz zeitnah wieder zurücksetzen, möchte dir aber gern die Gelegenheit geben dich dazu zu äußern. Benötigst du Hilfe oder hast du sonstige Fragen zum Projekt helfe ich dir gerne weiter.
Bis dahin schöne Grüße
!bm (2021-04-09 15:02:52+00:00): Empfehle full revert, der waterway wurde nämlich auch fälschlicherweise verändert, wenn man es mit Berlin Zoom vergleicht.
--besteGrüße!bm
Polarbear-repair (2021-04-09 18:45:04+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102664639 where the comment is: DE: Berlin: revert CS 102470898 (vandalism)
kuhni74 (2021-04-08 07:26:03+00:00): "valleys" are not rendered in the regular OSM viewer, which is regrettable in this particular case, since the feature is often mentioned in current media coverage
flother (2021-04-08 09:48:57+00:00): Valleys aren't visible on the OSM map, but I think it's better to enter correct data than it is to try and get openstreetmap.org to render something (the "Don't tag for the renderer" guideline).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

OSM data's used widely for academic research, other maps, geo search, and so we shouldn't prioritise the OSM map. It does shows up correctly as a valley in Nominatim, OSM's geocoder: https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=meradalir#map=19/63.89280/-22.23783
kuhni74 (2021-04-08 14:11:47+00:00): Point taken, although this is not satisfactory, in my opinion. Although Meradalir will be found in the Nominatim as an object, it is not displayed.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-04-07 20:20:05+00:00): Hi Alison,

It seems that you accidentally dragged a node (https://osmcha.org/changesets/102471293) in Brown Street across several other roads.

I have moved it back to the correct location.

You would have received some warnings before you uploaded the changeset, it's normally a good idea to check those.
kuhni74 (2021-04-08 07:27:12+00:00): "valleys" are not rendered in the regular OSM viewer, which is regrettable in this particular case, since the feature is related to Fagradalsfjall, which is often mentioned in current media coverage
flother (2021-04-08 09:49:47+00:00): Valleys aren't visible on the OSM map, but I think it's better to enter correct data than it is to try and get openstreetmap.org to render something (the "Don't tag for the renderer" guideline).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

OSM data's used widely for academic research, other maps, geo search, and so we shouldn't prioritise the OSM map. It does shows up correctly as a valley in Nominatim, OSM's geocoder: https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=fagridalur
kuhni74 (2021-04-08 14:12:36+00:00): Point taken, although this is not satisfactory, in my opinion. Although Fagridalur will be found in the Nominatim as an object, it is not displayed.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-04-07 20:23:18+00:00): Are you sure that there's a building here?
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927109938

It looks like a grassy residential backyard.

It seems like you're using the iD editor. You can square up the buildings you're adding by pressing "q" or selecting the option to do so in the editor.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-04-08 03:54:37+00:00): Most recent imagery (~3 months old) does not show any buildings of that size.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102471391
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-08 23:57:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106060517 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.