piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_15862816 (2022-08-27 18:49:04+00:00): Малесеньке питання: навіщо було переіменовувати з вул. Героїв полку «Азов» на вул. Героїв Полку Азов? У цій дії ви допустили 2 граматичних помилки і лише завдали більших кплопот, надалі будьте уважніше і не виправляйте, якщо не знаєте правил та норм української мови. Дякую.
muchichka_s (2022-08-27 20:18:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125416340

Треба з себе починати, а не займатися лицемірною псевдоввічливістю. Ти не хочеш нічого питати, а просто хочеш ткнути мене в лайно, бо я зачепив твою роботу. Звикай, це відкритий проєкт і всі можуть це зробити

В той момент, коли я підчищав твої граматичні помилки, мені здалося, що лапки в назві вулиці не зручно. Я скористався overpass-ом. І перевірив, що в Україні тільки 1 вулиця позначена з лапками крім цієї (вулиця крейсера Аврора в Києві) . Я подумав, що є домовленість не писати лапки, тому зробив без лапок. Та ти мене випередив і вийшло, що я потер твої зміни

В Києві проспект Правди, до 2016 року був проспектом «Правди» (з лапками) на честь газети. Але якщо ти відкриєш історію і подивишся, то не побачиш там ніяких лапок

І до речі, коли перейменовуєш вулицю, то треба підчищати і addr:street на об'єктах

Можливо ігнорування лапок пов'язане з тим, що їх важко вводити з клавіатури і тоді неможливо без КопіПасти проставити addr:street будівлям

В будь-якому випадку це треба уточнити

P.S. Поки ти перейменовував 1 вулицю, я перейменував 100, правда менших
muchichka_s (2022-08-27 20:42:42+00:00): Все я змінив на хатах на твій формат. Якщо хтось скаже, що не ок буду направляти до тебе. В мене все, більше не хочу на це тратити час
gszkr (2022-09-05 23:13:11+00:00): Co to za most? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089640554 
Przecież nic takiego tu nie ma. Są tunele, również Wilga przechodzi tunelem.
perusluku (2022-08-29 15:40:55+00:00): There is already node for Lidl little bit to the east, I think this is a duplicate?
skyper (2022-12-15 19:27:35+00:00): Hallo Schnrpl,
willkommen bei OSM.
Bitte arbeite in kleineren Gebieten, so wird es unübersichtlich und verwende aussagekräftiger Änderungskommentare. 
Bitte ändere kein `FIXME` in `fixme`. Das ist ein Problem von iD und es macht keinen Sinn die Objekte anzufassen ohne auch das Problem zu lösen. Ähnliches gilt für die name_index_suggestions. Dazu gibt es einige Diskussionen. Im Zweifel besser die Finger von lassen und kleine Änderungen vor der eigenen Haustüre machen.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2022-12-28 17:21:23+00:00): CS zurückgesetzt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130611650
gszkr (2022-09-01 08:58:18+00:00): Z czego naniosłeś domy? Ich obrys nie odpowiada danym z ewidencji budynków WMS (dostępna w edytorze, z którego jak widzę korzystasz)  - spójrz na prawidłowy kształt budynku 87a i na Twoje dwa "prostokąty". A w WMS wszystkie mają taki sam kształt - budynek to ściany, a nie zasięg dachu.
VeryStrangePerson (2022-09-01 10:48:15+00:00): Mówiąc WMS masz na myśli https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:WMS_for_Poland#Ma%C5%82opolskie a konkretnie Budynki? Niestety one nie działają dla mnie w Id, więc nie mogłem poprawnie zmapować.
VeryStrangePerson (2022-09-01 10:59:32+00:00): Nawet gry wybieram w danych mapy nakładka identyfikująca: Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS to nadal nie działa.
gszkr (2022-09-01 12:23:28+00:00): Ta nakładka nie jest demonem prędkości i trzeba uzbroić się w cierpliwość, by obrysy się załadowały. Czasami zdarza się też, że jakichś nowych budynków (jeszcze) w niej nie ma - ale akurat te są.
VeryStrangePerson (2022-09-01 16:45:13+00:00): Jutro zobaczę, bo na dziś mam blokadę na adres IP.
lefuturiste (2022-08-27 10:28:03+00:00): > Hello, Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
The next time you are doing contributions, could you please consider to split you work in multiple changesets? (eg. one changeset per continent or country)  It would make it easier for the community to navigate around contributions.
Thanks.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-04 11:24:03+00:00): Hello chriswarsash, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Just a quick question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089645635 - can people on bikes use it?  I suspect that the answer is "yes" because otherwise there'd be a gap in this long distance bike route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13725899#map=17/50.83537/-1.27710 .
Currently this is a "highway=footway" (that will have been assigned based on whatever you searched for in the editor.  If it's designed for use by bikes (as well as people on foot) then highway=cycleway might work; if it's designed for use by horses (also as well as people on foot) then perhaps highway=bridleway.
Best Regards,
Andy
chriswarsash (2022-09-04 11:40:21+00:00): Hi Andy, yes bikes can use it. Apologies for my poor editing, I was just trying to remove the car park but it appeared to be "attached" to this portion of path.
It's actually a permissive footpath but cyclists around here have been using it for years.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-04 12:32:56+00:00): No worries - I'll change it to the same as the bit to the east and add to the relevant relations.
legofahrrad (2022-09-02 18:44:35+00:00): Bitte gib deine Änderungssatzkommentare in der jeweiligen Landessprache an – oder einfach auf Englisch
user_1566574 (2022-08-30 10:20:07+00:00): Salut !
Merci de l'ajout ! Attention cependant, le nom "Parking..." est redondant avec la clé tourism=caravan_site.
Supaplex030 (2022-08-29 13:40:30+00:00): Erledigt das https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3268323?
kepivar (2022-08-27 19:21:59+00:00): Thanks your your cleanup. Has the coastline changed so much since https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110298283 ?
Qitay (2022-08-27 22:41:15+00:00): The imagery indicates so, but also the previous version was quite rough.
Ygramul (2022-10-24 22:45:31+00:00): Hallo; du hast hier beim Spielplatz als Namen »Spielplatz Frischlinstraße« eingetragen. Steht der Name dort irgendwo bzw. wo kommt der her? Oder wäre das eher eine description?

Beim Bewegungsparcour ist das vermutlich auch ähnlich; der hatte glaube ich einen Namen, aber nicht diesen.
Qwave (2022-10-25 06:16:17+00:00): Der Namen wird so von der Stadt Tübingen verwendet.
Qwave (2022-10-25 06:17:43+00:00): https://www.tuebingen.de/stadtplan/#spielplaetze Ist eine Quelle
Ygramul (2022-10-25 21:35:17+00:00): Hm, offenbar heißen quasi alle Spielplätze nach der nächstgelegenen Straße. Muß man da die Stadt noch fragen, ob das rechtlich in Ordnung ist, das von der Seite zu übernehmen (ist ja eine Sammlung, damit eher datenbankähnlich)? Steht ja leider an keinem Spielplatz ein Schild mit Namen dran.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-27 11:07:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124864960, 124865109, 124939580, 125052528, 125054773, 125066313, 125140114, 125141575, 125144206, 125206575, 125296690, 125303856, 125316135, 125316747, 125394055, 125395159, 125396051, 125396549, 125397907, 125399748, 125399912, 125400210, 125400532, 125400875, 125401940, 125402711, 125403396, 125403786, 125404545, 125405117, 125405384, 125406348, 125410392, 125410457, 125411052, 125411368, 125412222, 125412724, 125414978, 125433173, 125433210, 125433355.
abakus_uploader (2022-08-27 22:31:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2022-08-27 13:07:45+00:00): Hoi.. Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo.. Misschien is die gesplitste fietsoversteek een oneway=yes? 

Hroet
eggie
PèreForez (2025-05-07 14:57:22+00:00): Bonjour Lolonunu,
  D'abord merci d'avoir ce "monument" plutôt discret. Vous l'avez intitulé tombes de résistants. Or si je ne me trompe pas, et comme le dénomme le Souvenir Français dans l'article dont vous donnez le lien, il ne s'agit pas de tombes avec les corps des maquisards tués, mais uniquement d'un mémorial, où ils ne sont pas enterrés. Du coup il me semblerait préférable d'utiliser les attributs OSM "memorial" et "war_memorial" sans les compléments de "tomb" et de "war_grave". Et de plus,  si vous connaissez notre site memorialgenweb.org ,je suggère d'ajouter l'attribut "ref:FR:MemorialGenWeb= 156618" n°du relevé du monument correspondant, qui permet d'avoir la liste et les informations des inscrits sur le monument.
Cordialement
Lolonunu39 (2025-05-08 14:53:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Un grand merci pour la précision PèreForez,
La rectification sera effectuée.
Cordialement Lolonunu
user_3626133 (2022-08-27 12:28:08+00:00): Volevo segnalare che il ponte che attraversa il torrente principale, è un ponte tipo tibetano, ma non so come specificarlo. Grazie a chi vuole/può correggere!
ivanbranco (2022-08-27 13:26:07+00:00): Ciao, si potrebbe aggiungere questo tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge:structure%3Dsimple-suspension
user_3626133 (2022-08-27 19:08:09+00:00): Perfetto. Grazie, sistemo subito!
Tilia_J (2022-08-27 17:49:29+00:00): "The rough in golf terminology is an area where the grass on a golf course has been deliberately allowed to grow long [...] purpose of separating the fairway from the surroundings"

Why would you tag the adjacent forest landuses as rough while the roughs are  clearly not mapped (there is no landuse or golf-related elements mapped between the fairway and the forests)?

And why did you remove the alphanumeric prefix before the reference?. The result is that you ended up with multiple identical references (as the E, N and S stand for East, North and South).

Even stranger: For "Zuid Hole1" you replaced "S1"with "10"
Tilia_J (2022-08-30 07:52:16+00:00): Changeset reverted due to:

-No response
-Wrong tagging with strange or no rendering as a result
-Doubts about references
emersonveenstra (2022-08-27 14:29:33+00:00): Hi,

You left a blank line here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089670924
silversurfer83 (2022-08-28 20:08:58+00:00): Hi :)
Wenn das jetzt Grasland ist, dann kann ja auch "plant=christmas_trees" gelöscht werden, oder?
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125442915
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-13 13:08:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9981586137/history has roof = yes that was added in this edit
Have you meant anything by that value? If yes, what you wanted to express?
goodidea (2025-06-14 16:26:47+00:00): What's your problem with this tag?

I want to express what the tag expresses (it has a red roof). I know, this is an old tag (it was in the wiki at pipeline=marker), now undocumented at marker=*, but I saw it in use with markers, and there is no good alternative so far (IMO it's NOT a marker=aerial, because there is nothing written on the roof, although the roof may be for an aerial detection, but I'm not sure – it may also be a weather protection for the post or to better see it from the ground – some of these poles only have a red vertical rectangle instead of such a roof, then I don't tag this with roof=yes). The appropriate tag is definitely maker=pole, you can only see the plate with the information from the ground. 

Anyway, I still use it for these cases (ATYL!), because it is very noticeable on such a post.

Here is an example (not in my region, but it's the same): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stegelitz_(M%C3%B6ckern)_-_HD37_W%C3%B6We1.jpg
SekeRob (2022-08-27 13:38:53+00:00): OK, wood and farmlands render again.
haukep (2022-08-27 17:26:18+00:00): Hallo! Danke für die Bearbeitung. Hier kurz nachgefragt:
Heißt dieser Teil des Gewässers wirklich "Altarm Werse" (also gilt wirklich "name=Altarm Werse")?
Oder handelt es sich lediglich um einen der Altarme der Werse (also würde "description=Altarm Werse" besser passen)?
Brummelwuff (2022-08-27 18:05:28+00:00): Hallo, im North Rhine-Westphalia ALKIS ist das Gewesser als Altarm Werse bezeichnet. Also Blaue Schrift im Gewässer.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-27 14:28:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125444868 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-27 14:28:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125444868 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-27 14:28:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125444868 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
Map-Peter (2022-08-27 18:04:04+00:00): Hallo gryban1,
 
boat=yes ist hier aber falsch. Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:boat sind zwar Kanus mit aufgelistet, aber durch canoe=yes bereits erfasst. Andere Boote (ausgenommen Kanu und Kajak) passen gar nicht auf die schmale Lore und hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1028282643 ist es schon zu schmal im Uferbereich für ein normales Ruderboot ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruderboot#/media/Datei:Ruderboot_1.jpg ).
 
PS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13746803
 
Gruß Peter
gryban1 (2022-08-27 19:14:47+00:00): Hallo Peter,

du hast natürlich Recht, für ein Ruderboot wirds dort etwas eng, aber OSM kann ja auch nicht wissen, was für ein Boot du fährst.
Vielleicht denke ich ja falsch, aber ich sehe OSM als den harten Faktengeber (Gewässer betreten erlaubt?, Motor erlaubt?, Gewässerbreite und -tiefe, etc.) und erst dein Navi kann dir dann sagen, ob du da fahren darfst und kannst. OsmAnd bietet doch genau dafür unter den Navieinstellungen die Möglichkeit die Höhe und Breite deines Vehikels angeben zu können.

Meine Änderung hat im Übrigen nichts bewirkt. Scheinbar prüft OsmAnd nur, ob das Medium Wasser ist und eine Fließrichtung hat, sonst kann es keine Route auf dem Wasser berechnen. :(
Da ist noch Potential nach oben. Werde die Leute von OsmAnd mal kontaktieren.

Viele Grüße,
Roland
SekeRob (2022-08-27 14:11:21+00:00): This has restored this large forest MP render which was broek since longer as no-show in 2km zoom-out and greater.
ToniE (2022-08-28 16:08:48+00:00): Hi Zorae,

maybe your edits left some bus routes in a bad state (iD is not really a good editor to handle that).

Kindly see the errors reported in PTNA for Bus 601 and following ones.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html#bus_601

Maybe not all errors reported there are caused by your edits though.

BR
Toni
Agaric (2022-08-27 14:15:11+00:00): source= survey
solenoid jam (2023-07-07 04:24:12+00:00): Bonjour.
Je corrige des erreurs dans la balise "denotation", et j'ai remarqué que dans votre édition il y a une valeur obscure "denotation=talus".
Pouvez-vous me dire ce que cela signifie ? Peut-être s'agit-il d'une valeur supplémentaire ?


Hi.
I'm correcting errors in the "denotation" tag, and I noticed that in your edit there is an obscure value "denotation=talus"
Can you please tell me what it means? Maybe this value is unnecessary?
user_5359 (2022-08-31 07:36:49+00:00): Hello! You add a way without any highway key.
Fijord (2022-08-31 13:19:20+00:00): What should I add? Many thanks for the support.
user_5359 (2022-08-31 13:33:09+00:00): The subsequent paths all have the tag highway=path.
Fijord (2022-08-31 13:43:36+00:00): Entschuldigung verstehe dich nicht korrekt. Was kann ich ändern?
user_5359 (2022-08-31 14:01:23+00:00): Unter der Annahme, dass sich der Weg nicht von Wegstücken davor und dahin unterscheidet, wäre die beste Variante, den gleichen Beschreibung zu verwenden.

Assuming that the path does not differ from path sections before and there, the best variant would be to use the same description.
Fijord (2022-09-01 07:41:57+00:00): OK, vielen Dank, habe es geändert.
Warin61 (2022-08-27 22:59:25+00:00): Hi
Relation 14509584 shares segments. That is an error. 

I'd delete the relation and simply put the tags on the ways.
Warin61 (2022-09-01 00:02:27+00:00): Still not fixed... 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=120.64522&lat=-23.87898&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

And quote from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon "Relations of type multipolygon are used to represent areas (polygons), typically complex areas with holes inside, or consisting of multiple disjoint areas." Note the 'disjointed areas' .. this is not a disjointed area... so it is not a multipolygon.
ZLima12 (2024-06-20 21:07:51+00:00): Hi,

I know this is late, but you added `name=State Route 11` to US-11, which is a US route, not a state route. It could be argued that it shouldn't have a `name` tag at all, since the route number is already in `ref`, but it definitely shouldn't be named "State Route" anything. I see you also did the same for "State Route 6&11". Please let me know if you want to fix them, otherwise I'll do it.
DUGA (2024-06-20 21:12:06+00:00): This is the designated name from the county, you should not change just because it is US-11.

It is very common in PA to name them as state route, they even have the ref 0011.
ZLima12 (2024-06-20 21:35:56+00:00): Thanks for responding so quickly. When you say "the designated name from the county", where exactly are you getting this data from? I checked on Bing Streetside for part of this road (from the state line to Great Bend), and I couldn't see any street signs for the road. By the "on the ground" rule, I would say there should be no `name` tag at all for this section.
DUGA (2024-06-20 23:39:55+00:00): This is the name used by E911. Some information can be publicly found at:

https://www.susqco.com/departments/gis-mapping
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-27 14:28:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125443915, 125443945, 125443982, 125444011, 125444034.
mcliquid (2022-08-30 05:23:01+00:00): Hallo, bei deiner Anpassungen scheinst du die ganzen Bus-Relationen nicht beachtet zu haben.
Die Grazer Straße hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606248059#map=19/47.00894/16.19313) sollte wohl viel eher aufhören und in die Einbahnstraße münden. Aktuell sind die Busverbindungen in einer Sackgasse "gefangen" und enden abrupt hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1291468507

Schaust du dir das bitte nochmals an und korrigierst du Busverbindungen?
Vielen Dank!
René84828 (2022-08-30 09:16:25+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! 
Ich habe es jetzt nachbearbeitet und hoffe, dass jetzt alles wieder richtig funktioniert.
Sollte ich doch noch etwas übersehen haben, teile mir das bitte mit!
Vielen Danke!
mcliquid (2022-08-30 14:50:56+00:00): Dankeschön!
canfe (2022-08-29 06:39:39+00:00): OSM vieta espressamente ogni forma di pubblicità. Pertanto correggi la description in modo che sia una descrizione e non una promozione per tutte la varie sedi che hai mappato.
LockOnGuy (2022-08-28 17:52:33+00:00): Hello, Why are you putting name with Persian letters instead of Arabic for the name tags?       
You added 7 residential road names, what is your sources? in Iraq all residential roads do not have a name, instead they have a district and an alley number, what is the source of the names you put?     
From what map are you copying?
LockOnGuy (2022-08-28 17:59:08+00:00): Also, why did you remove the oneway tag from w47761935? it was correct lawfully, in Iraq if there is a road that have 4 ways, 2 main and 2 secondary on the side, that means two ways to go and two ways to return.      
You put "knowledge" as your source but you don't have any knowledge in Iraq's highway system!
MUHAMMED`sab (2022-08-29 17:23:28+00:00): Hello,
 According to the Maxar aerial imagery, the direction of the cars seemed to be two-way and I removed the oneway tag from w47761935 .
I have edited it correctly now .
Thanks for your guidance
LockOnGuy (2022-08-29 17:26:54+00:00): Please answer my first question here.     
What is your source? What map are you copying from? And are you a part of Iranian Neshan team?
MUHAMMED`sab (2022-08-31 16:26:11+00:00): Yes, I am a member of the Neshan team.
My source is the Neshan's operators who live in Iraq.
MUHAMMED`sab (2022-09-03 15:03:19+00:00): Hello, 
okay, from now on I will not name residential streets and I will remove the names of residential streets that I named before.
Yes, I will definitely use Arabic letters to name the primary streets.
 thanks for your complete explanation
LockOnGuy (2022-08-28 17:40:03+00:00): What is your source please?         
You are part of Neshan team right? which is from Iran, another country, how can you have knowledge in street names?          
Please define the source of these names.        
And add the team/group name to your profile.
LockOnGuy (2022-08-28 17:46:45+00:00): What is your source for w851275184 and w455334759 ? and why did you put the 'name' tag for them with Persian letters instead of Arabic?
Bexhill-OSM (2022-08-28 00:57:22+00:00): What is failing? Using images seperated by semicolons is much less obnoxious than creating a whole new tag name based on the images description?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-28 04:54:10+00:00): yes

I guess it depends on how common you expect for anyone to support semicolon delimited tagging here

At least in my opinion support for one single-value image and dubious support for extra images is much better than no support at all

Though I guess one may be in position of expecting semicolon support as bare minimum (even if that is really unusual and I would expect this tag to be single valued)
Bexhill-OSM (2022-08-28 13:06:38+00:00): We have a local project here that uses these semicolons, hence why these changes to the tag name wouldn't really work.
I'd be interested to find a middle ground through, maybe the first tag wikimedia_commons would be a single image, then, wikimedia_commons_1 could start using semicolons for multiple images.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-29 04:54:34+00:00): wikimedia_commons_1 solution is also fine for me
Bexhill-OSM (2022-09-23 15:35:59+00:00): I made those changes in 126553877
silversurfer83 (2022-08-28 20:25:10+00:00): Nochmal Hallo :)
An dieser Stelle noch ein Hinweis auf den Artikel zum Thema Namen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125447312
Vinber-Pro (2025-04-24 16:33:18+00:00): bonjour,
je ne suis pas vraiment d'accord avec le fait de laisser amenity=school pour des questions de rendu mais bon, ok. Par contre je pense remplacer school:FR=groupe-scolaire par school:FR=primaire car l'ensemble élémentaire + maternelle c'est du primaire, est-ce ok ?

bonne carto
osmviborg (2022-08-28 05:21:08+00:00): Øst? 😉
eggie (2022-08-27 17:12:54+00:00): Hi Manfred.. Your caravan_site without name  is situated in the middle of the canal?

Perhaps an official camperplace here?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-08-27 17:20:08+00:00): Replaced caravan_site by parking street_side
greetz
eggie
eggie (2022-08-28 15:15:49+00:00): Replaced caravan_site.. Is this an official camperplace?
If not please delete.
Greetz,
eggie