piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-05-01 05:22:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback De camping staat al op de kaart van OSM.. De camping heet niet name=Markelo , maar Landgoed Kattenbergse Hoeve
Ik zal de vermelding weer verwijderen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
drivec (2022-05-11 03:13:17+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
MxxCon (2022-05-01 04:38:18+00:00): Where all this data is coming from? This looks very spammy and I'm leaning towards deleting it all.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120402082
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-30 23:12:53+00:00): Bisset, the name that was used on the map is erroneous and alien, see wikipedia page  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bissett,_Manitoba
MxxCon (2022-05-01 04:40:44+00:00): Hello.
If it's not already mapped, perhaps add that fence/gate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120402463
drivec (2022-05-11 03:23:53+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_5359 (2022-05-01 15:01:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1056223743. What is the meaning of the tag statust = AM,tender:CN1038834/29.01.2022?
RobertH-PUM (2022-05-01 19:08:08+00:00): Mistyped "status" .
It's a tag we use to mark the project progress. 
AM means environmentalpermit and the tender code is for SEAP ( Online project tendering for Romania)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Timmy_Tesseract (2022-05-02 05:39:36+00:00): Good afternoon Erwin,

The locally spoken languages in Tagakpan are Bisaya and Klata. Anyone conversing in either of them uses the term Barangay Hall. This is also the name that is written on the facade of the building. 

Adding additional non-local translations seems fine, but please don't replace the primary name tag.
GOwin (2022-05-02 06:06:25+00:00): Thank you for the reminder, and  updating the feature.

Do remember the Filipino and English are two of the official languages in the country, so I don't see any reason why the English version should have precedence over the Filipino name. Of course, the best value for name=* is whatever name they use in the lingua franca (e.g. Visayan, Bicolano, etcetera), but between Filipino and English, I would prefer the former.
Timmy_Tesseract (2022-05-02 08:32:40+00:00): I agree that English should not have any default precedence. It is my impression that there is almost always a name that is more predominantly used than the other,  but I like the idea to use the language with the most native speakers in a given area for the primary name tag if an object truly has equally common names in several official languages.
lyctkel (2022-06-22 10:42:10+00:00): Привет Lucifer Kinoff,
В настоящее время я исследую некоторые редко используемые теги building=*.
В процессе я нашел https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056327783, который использует building=кгш.
Этот тег используется только дважды во всем мире. Насколько я могу судить, это часть электрической подстанции.
С моей точки зрения, лучше бы подошли теги building=service или building=industrial.
Смотрите https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Abuilding для деталей.
С уважением,
lyctkel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Frans S (2022-05-23 11:26:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate enough and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120403891
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Allison P (2022-05-01 14:21:17+00:00): Is this really a gravel path? It looks pretty informal, and other trails in the area are dirt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
tastrax (2022-05-06 11:53:41+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Pierce (2022-05-07 12:58:47+00:00): Yeah sorry, I was meaning to clean it up using iD but I had forgotten. Unfortunately Organic Maps does not permit characters other than numbers to be entered.
Thanks for picking it up and fixing it it up, I’ll try to be more diligent in the future.
tastrax (2022-05-07 13:20:36+00:00): Many thanks for getting back to me. I will see if I can get the developers of Organic Maps to at least allow the + symbol in the phone number field to make these edits possible.
tastrax (2022-05-08 05:40:00+00:00): Hi Pierce - the developers have advised that you should be able to add the + symbol in both IOS and Android. On IOS its necessary to do a long press of the 0 key to get the + symbol. Does this work for you? I assume its the same in Android?
Pierce (2022-05-08 09:03:02+00:00): Well ain't I a fool!
It does work on iOS after all!
I apologise for the nuance caused with my incomplete phone number entries.
tastrax (2022-05-08 12:09:03+00:00): No worries - have fun mapping!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-06 09:05:29+00:00): Osm is not a personal map
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-06 09:10:18+00:00): Please don't tag roads as paths. Your last 2 changesets have been reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120404525
tonyf1 (2022-05-07 06:42:27+00:00): Hi Way: 326012697. There is a sign. https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-38.113213611726&lng=145.29940143715&z=17&pKey=1003221370565611&focus=photo&x=0.26573635477691526&y=0.720188367558698&zoom=1.7729138166894665 end shared path which implies that some or all of the  path north is shared
tonyf1 (2022-05-14 23:46:06+00:00): see Changeset #120995852, way: 326012697 restored to previous state
drivec (2022-05-11 03:23:42+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_2066394 (2022-05-01 10:03:56+00:00): Maproulette berücksichtigt hier die bereits als Knoten auf dem Umriss erfassten Adressen nicht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4385395996
Damit ergeben sich Duplikate.
drivec (2022-05-11 03:23:25+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
TheDutchMan13 (2022-05-01 03:31:08+00:00): Removed rail station that doesn't exist.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
drivec (2022-05-11 03:23:21+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
ivanbranco (2024-02-29 12:40:38+00:00): Hi JoeG,

I got curious about this tree:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9706317161/history

is leaf_type=none a synonym for the more used leaf_type=leafless?

Also what's special about this specific tree? It's the only one singularly mapped in the entire natural wood area. The reason could be added in description= or note=.

Thanks and good mapping :)
JoeG (2024-02-29 21:16:22+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,
This is testing my memory given it was 2y ago, but I think it would have been a large old dead tree that stands out as a landmark particularly given its location near the path and viewpoint. I'll try to go out there again soon and confirm.
I think I may have used dead_tree as a value in other cases but tagging around that hasn't really standardised.
BudgieInWA (2022-05-01 08:47:30+00:00): It looks like Vespucci didn't agree with the ramp behind Bossman and the indoor footpath (?) through that building.

Also, highway=footway is preferred over highway=path for paved paths. `path` is less specific than `footway`, so I only use it for tracks through the bush and desire paths over grass and stuff.
Sam Wilson (2022-05-01 08:49:32+00:00): Hmm yes good point. I'll fix it up! I've got some photos I think.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Udarian (2022-05-01 04:11:57+00:00): my commit message got clipped again so I have placed the intended message below:

updated more residential areas to the right of turnpike when north bound. this including, road geometry updates, tagging updates to those roads. added stop signs and speed bumps were ever I saw them from aerial imagery (for the speed bumps) and did some TIGER clean up. also added some recreational facilities and sidewalks/crossings wherever necessary
ivanbranco (2022-05-04 15:58:31+00:00): Hi mnsormohmmad,

what's the meaning of service=2?
nona mostafa (2022-05-12 09:41:03+00:00): Hello ivanbranco;
I fixed this highway "https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056343800/history" and also, Removed the "oneway" tag because the way was a dead end.
Regards
nona mostafa
ivanbranco (2022-05-04 15:59:35+00:00): Hi mnsormohmmad,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056344292

how can it have both the name=* tag and noname=yes? Can you check it out please?
nona mostafa (2022-05-12 09:35:34+00:00): Hello ivanbranco;
I fixed this issue.
Regards
nona mostafa
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-01 04:47:53+00:00): oops, i meant added missing street names with sources
osmviborg (2022-05-01 06:27:39+00:00): Vejene er nu markeret som 'Privat', access=private & har fået sit rigtige navn igen.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-01 04:48:16+00:00): oops, i meant added missing street names with sources
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-01 04:48:42+00:00): sorry about that
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Filip009 (2022-05-01 09:53:17+00:00): Everytime I forgot to close changeset :(
Miss_Pink_Elf♪ (2022-05-03 00:18:03+00:00): 请不要在name标签中使用多重名。另外表达一下自己的观点：osm中name标签更泛指通名而不是官方名。虽然中国官方规划中并没有“成渝高速”，但成渝高速一名由来已久，现已成为约定俗成的名字，甚至在某些地方文件中也如此称之，同时在现况下也不会与其他高速的名字引起冲突。所以完全可以保留“成渝高速”之通名，官方建制可在编号、线路关系以及official_name中体现。
喵耳引力波 (2022-05-03 13:31:17+00:00): 感谢您对宝贵的文化遗产的收集与贡献！
martien-176 (2022-05-01 15:58:27+00:00): Hi, welcome to HOTOSM. You requested a review of your mappings.

The buildings you mapped here are good as to tracing of the footprint on the imagery. 

But do not forget to square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. 

As to the mapped roads: remember that we are only mapping buildings in this project. Humanitarian organizations set the features to be mapped based on their priorities - any time spent mapping other features might slow down the completion of their projects.

Keep up the mapping - many thanks! Kind regards, Martien, global validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120407548
timmito (2022-07-01 19:19:47+00:00): Hallo Wetterauer, das Schrenzerbad ist doch bereits als Fläche erfasst?
parsd51 (2022-05-03 19:51:06+00:00): Hej

Super med førstehåndsindtryk, det kan quick orto 2022 ikke klare :-)

Et par ting i dit CS har fået mig til at undre mig lidt. Så jeg har et par spørgsmål.

Er det rigtigt at færdsel fra Vestergårds Alle pt. ikke kan køre via "den gamle" Herredsvejen direkte til Blegindvej?
(men godt fra cykelstien længere mod øst). Jeg tænker det vil være en hensigtsmæssigt at bevare den indtil hele den nye vej åbner.

Mener du lane eller track med cycleway(:right)=yes?

Hilsen
parsd51
MichaelVL (2022-05-04 20:00:02+00:00): Hej,

Ja, det er korrekt (i det mindste for nogle dage siden) af man ikke kan køre til højre fra Vestergårds Alle ind på "den gamle" Herredsvejen. Men der var fuld gang i arbejdet med stykket mellem Vestergårds Alle og Østergårds Alle, så det åbner nok snart.

Har opdateret cycleway typen de øvrige steder...
parsd51 (2022-05-05 11:20:18+00:00): Super, tak :-)
Anton Melnichuk (2022-05-02 19:37:40+00:00): please not edit Ukraine map in war time

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
mueschel (2022-05-21 11:34:39+00:00): Hi,
what does 'sidewalk:left:marking_road' mean? This tag is not used in any other place.
xrt (2022-06-06 09:26:48+00:00): Bonjour mueschel
Nous avions déjà parlé ensemble, sur Lyon. Je ne parle pas anglais, ni allemand car j'ai vu que tu es dans une petite ville allemande.

On peut donner plusieurs valeurs à un tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:sidewalk

Voir la ligne " sidewalk:both:kerb=* " pour un trottoir traditionnel

" marking_road " est utilisé pour les marques de peinture sur la route

Donc " sidewalk:left:marking_road=yes " me semble valide pour une circulation piéton limitée par de la peinture sur une chaussée
mueschel (2022-06-06 09:48:48+00:00): Hi,
(sorry, I have to stay with English as I don't speak French, but online translators seem to work well enough)
I understand what you want to tag here. The term 'marking road' doesn't make sense in English as it would mean "a road made for marking", whatever that would be. The term for a marking on a road is 'road_marking' (which is already used as a tag)

Maybe you can find a better tag for this?
Maybe have a look here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Radwege#Beispiele_verschiedener_Radwege
You might be able to use tags from the third example, just with 'sidewalk' instead of 'cycleway'.

I'd like to suggest introducing a new 'sidewalk:left = lane' tag. That would be perfectly similar to established cycleway tags.
user_5359 (2022-05-01 09:26:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A park isn't a training field. Did you see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch?
leafdude (2022-05-02 08:13:26+00:00): I see what you mean, but it is essentially a park except when used by the boy scouts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
Bernhard Hiller (2022-05-09 16:47:11+00:00): way seems wrong:
note=dirt road
tracktype=grade3
So, instead,
surface=paved
may be the wrong entry.
By the way, mechanical edits must be approved first.
Bernhard Hiller (2022-05-09 16:47:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120409825
Bernhard Hiller (2022-05-09 16:48:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393534502/history
Vinber-Pro (2022-05-04 16:06:13+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap !
Quelques informations d'accueil : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Sur la pharmacie, l'Étang est le nom de famille ? il est recommandé de mettre seulement la première lettre en majuscule et pas l'ensemble du nom (je peux le faire ou vous pouvez le faire :) )

Bonne cartographie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
Warin61 (2022-05-04 00:31:49+00:00): Hi,
Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. 

In this case I have combined the 2 ways into one simple way. Then transferred the relation tags to the way ... and then deleted the relation.
Warin61 (2022-06-07 06:27:17+00:00): sport=handball is on a court some 40 metres by 20 metres. What you have here is the sport=four_square.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
Lejun (2022-05-04 13:00:57+00:00): Salut et bienvenue dans la communauté. J’ai vérifié ta contribution et bien qu’il y ait du stationnement à cet endroit les attributs que tu as mis ne correspondent pas.

Pour du stationnement on utilise les attributs amenity=parking et, dans ce cas précis, on peut ajouter parking=street_side.

Toutes ces informations sont disponibles sur le wiki que je t’invite vivement à consulter. Je te laisse faire les corrections et reste à disposition si tu as des questions.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dparking
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:parking=street_side
Grinbert 🙂 (2022-05-01 16:23:36+00:00): source: survey
highflyer74 (2022-06-26 12:28:27+00:00): Moin!

Ich habe Fragen zu Deiner Änderung hier:

Ist das Restaurant eine Brauerei? Das habe ich bei meinem Aufenthalt gar nicht gesehen.

Auch die Website und die Telefonnummer ist jetzt zweimal getaggt (sie waren bereits im gleichwertigen contact:* Schema getaggt worden).

Sei so nett, dir immer alle vorhandenen Attribute anzuschauen. Ich passe es entsprechend an.

Viele Grüße!
Gerhard42 (2022-06-27 09:29:07+00:00): Hi,
da hab ich wohl was übersehen. Danke fürs korrigieren.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-03 20:56:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120516188 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed renaming of Persian/Arabian Gulf, please discuss on talk list before touching this.