piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nlehuby (2020-06-08 16:57:05+00:00): Hi ToniE,

Thanks for reaching out. 

I don't use PTNA that much, I rather have my quality assurance checks in JOSM so I mostly use Jungle Bus validation ruleset and PT Assistant.

The csv lists for Île-de-France are quite old now, and I have created them from a GTFS file (updated each week). 

Do you want me to update the csv ? do you want to use the GTFS instead ? Or do you prefer to delete the region as it not very used.

Best regards
ToniE (2020-06-09 06:45:54+00:00): Hello,

well, actually the ~50 analysis tasks consume a lot of time. So, if no one really uses the results, I'd like to delete them.

I'll talk to EvanE, a German mapper from the area of Cologne before deleting. I noticed some edits in the IDF area and assume that he checked PTNA to see where to fix error / close gaps.

I'll let you know.

Best regards and stay healthy
Toni
RicoElectrico (2020-06-10 19:28:21+00:00): Hej, czy ten budynek w ogóle istnieje? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292486199/
mosstreet (2020-06-06 16:24:33+00:00): Здраствуйте, просьба ознакомиться с https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86012595 и отменить вашу правку самостоятельно.
mosstreet (2020-06-06 16:25:27+00:00): Hello, please read https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86012595 and cancel your edit yourself.
Admasawi (2020-06-08 22:56:12+00:00): Thanks for alerting me to the disagreement regarding these highway classifications. I have reverted my edits.
Myazyk (2020-10-29 19:49:54+00:00): Якого ти фіга лізеш редагувати межі населених пунктів, якщо ти не знаєш місцевих нюансів?
Наприклад ,межа Бориславської міської ради та межа міста Борислав відрізняються!
Треба вникнути у реалії нашої держави щоб то усвідомити
jomox (2020-06-08 14:01:23+00:00): Hallo @nrdmn

StreetComplete hat hier maxheight=default hinzugefügt. Ich kenne die Frage/Antwort von StreetComplete nicht, aber in Deutschland bedeutet dieser Tag, dass die Höhe mindestens 4,5m ist.

Ich gehe davon aus, dass es sich um diese Durchfahrt handelt: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.7704829&lng=6.0664245&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=LQspEFfpa1_lb3XzVQEBGQ&x=0.7521766092933309&y=0.3592436582194832&zoom=1.2039387549184493

Das sieht nach etwa 3m aus. Wenn es kein Schild gibt, dass die (rechtliche) Durchfahrtshöhe beschränkt, wäre maxheight=below_default der richtige Tag. (Siehe hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxheight#weitere_Werte_f.C3.BCr_maxheight)

Wenn du die tatsächliche Höhe kennst oder schätzen kannst/willst, könntest du zusätzlich auch maxheight:physical=3 (für 3 Meter) setzen. Siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight:physical
Frans S (2020-06-06 09:51:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A short note
Please don't connect buildings with their nodes to each other. 
Thanks
Florimondable (2020-06-06 11:10:38+00:00): Salut, tu as mis en sens unique l'av de Clichy, sauf qu'hier en passant ce n'était pas encore le cas (panneau recouvert).
De plus les cyclistes et bus sont à double sens au moins.
Je corrige le double sens vélo/bus
Florimondable (2020-06-06 11:12:12+00:00): et le sens unique n'est pas dans la même direction sur toute la longueur ?
Truchin (2020-06-06 19:05:16+00:00): Ce n'est pas hyper clair sur le terrain. A voir dans les jours qui viennent avec le double sens d'Amsterdam.
Pour le sens unique, c'est possible que j'ai loupé un tronçon dans OSM.
Thomas
SHARCRASH (2021-09-22 09:29:08+00:00): Hi! If you could find a way like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499660348, do not erase. If it's blocked by a feature, there are tags to inform users it is so. Also if it's in the lowest tracktype grade it's because there is a reason: uncompacted soft dirt, grasses and other loose material. Please be accurate! Even if these aren't useful for someone, it may be useful for others and help in matters of orientation and completeing what can be found on terrain.
SHARCRASH (2021-09-22 09:30:15+00:00): By "erase", i rather ment "deactivate" it by editing the key highway
SHARCRASH (2021-09-22 09:44:44+00:00): And what i meant about the grade5, is that obviously it is used very rarely, hence the uncompacted terrain. To make it clear.
GeWaLu (2021-10-03 11:27:08+00:00): Hi SHARCRASH,
Sorry, last year when I passed by I had a problems with a a few ways in this this forest which were mostly unusable. I hope I didn't make a mistake and picked a wrong one but they were blocked by several trees lying over the way (so not only one feature)  and I had to climb over them (some of these looked like put on purpose to "deactivate" the way by the forest owner). I did on purpose not delete the ways as there were traces visible and used the lifecyle prefix while trying to be as precise as possible following the documentation on wiki.openstreetmap.org. Btw: On my map tool the disused and abandoned features are not deleted but still visible but less prominent - but I know that this is not like that in all tools.
As you just resurveyed this, I suppose you also know that there was a lot of forest work during this spring in this forest - so I assume the ways are again in a better shape than they used to be last year. 

In my opinion even Grade 5 ones should be somehow usable and not blocked for all traffic  - especially looking at the pictures on (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype)

By the way : If the way is now again on a good shape, you could also have deleted the comment as that one is not needed anymore. I can also delete it ... but I am not sure when I pass there the next time (and I only do modifications after survey)
SHARCRASH (2021-10-03 11:42:43+00:00): It's not because it is not anymore usable in your opinion that you should deactivate the higwhay. That's not right, that's rather subjective, you have to consider other people. Just to give the obvious, we do not neither deactivate a road because at a certain point there is a bollard, other kind of users can still use the rest of the highway. The right assessment about creating or deleting elements is if it is still identifiable, or "verifiable" as OSM contributors often say. The tags such as surface, smoothness, etc are there to let and allow each kind of user to asses subjectively. That's why i said that if there are fallen logs, there are tags to express such features on the map.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-03 11:43:20+00:00): Nevertheless, thank you for the answer. Better late than never. :)
GeWaLu (2021-10-03 15:24:19+00:00): I am willing to learn from more experienced mappers - and in general try to map very carefully. Sorry that I took a few days to answer - I only map in my free time.

Note however that I deleted and deactivated nothing. I only used a lifecycle prefix which is documented in the data-model (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix). All features in in a later lifecyle are still supposed to be "verifiable" - so I did not violate that rule.  If I remember well - unless I mixed up here a way - things were worse than only a bollard or one single tree. Ok ... I agree - smoothness "very_horrible" (or "impassable") is also indicating that the way is merely unusable. I'll consider that in future.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-03 16:04:20+00:00): That's the good attitude 🙂 thanks for your understanding! Myself i'm ever learning as there are anyway new tags. I trust you did this just because of misinterpretation, not for tampering data. Nevertheless deactivating or deleting an element has the same consequence for the rendering on the map which is the end product.  Unfortunately there are people who delete/deactivate elements which are obvioulsy existing and keep stating that it doesn't exist anymore even though there are touristic structures nearby such as benches or handrails. Crazy! 

Wishing you a good weekend!
pitscheplatsch (2020-06-06 13:51:11+00:00): Hi mspray13, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting almost 400 mapped buildings? Thanks.

See: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=86259060

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
danieldegroot2 (2020-07-13 20:33:36+00:00): Zie Mapillary (H2 2019); De twee fietspaden sluiten niet aan.

Overigens hadden de grasvelden verlegd moeten worden op de kaart als dit wel zo was.
sovereign_ch (2020-06-05 21:43:53+00:00): This idiotic iD-Syncbutton-Edit is totally unacceptable. Many POI were individually edited in the last days, so this one is wiped. Cheers
XimeX (2020-06-22 17:48:55+00:00): Hallo,
Hier sind jetzt 2x Hundewald (leisure=dog_park) eingezeichnet.
Ich schätze mal da ist einer zuviel oder?
LG
mappatman (2020-06-23 18:27:14+00:00): Ja, danke, habe ich wieder entfernt. Hatte die Änderung offline und es hat zufällig zwischenzeitlich wer anderer gemappt.
Carto'Cité (2020-07-10 09:45:03+00:00): Hello.
I'm just being curious : it looks like you unshared a number of nodes on indoor areas and rooms of the Montparnasse station. This is fine by me however I'm curious as to why you did so, i.e. is that for a specific usage of the data ?
Regards,
Antoine from Carto’Cité, #CartoTransilien project
gpesquero (2020-07-11 21:56:56+00:00): Hello Antoine.
I probably merged nodes that are on the same spot. I normally use the website <www.keepright.at> to check for errors in the map. One of the warnings displayed in this website is “multiple nodes on the same spot”.
Happy mapping! Gonzalo.
Carto'Cité (2020-07-20 07:40:36+00:00): Actually these nodes were not on the same level, i.e. they belonged to ways with a different values of the tag level. 

Your change is fine and didn't break any indoor data, however please bear in mind that KeepRight was implemented for roads before the (growing) usage of the simple indoor tagging scheme. As any OSM QA tool it doesn't show errors but suspicions of errors, that need to be investigated by mappers rather than being fixed blindly. 

Cheerio !
Antoine.
Carto'Cité (2020-06-15 14:09:57+00:00): Bonjour Maewyn,
Je me permets de corriger ton contribution, highway=path était a priori correct et permettait déjà les cycliste de l'emprunter. Par contre ce chemin est de le prolongement d'une voie verte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636608867) et peut-être qu'il s'agit aussi d'une voie verte ou d'un aménagement explicitement (avec un panneau) utilisable pour les vélos et dans ce cas bicycle=designated serait approprié. J'ai ajouté segregated=no car il ne semble pas y avoir de séparation explicite entre piétons et cyclistes.
N'hésite pas à me dire si tu as des informations complémentaires. Aussi si tu as besoin de garder une trace du terrain pour toi ou pour partager avec les autres contributeurs, n'hésite pas à regarder du côté du projet Mapillary et son appication.
À très bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2020-06-15 14:11:31+00:00): Cette photo semble montrer qu'il ne s'agit plus d'un voie verte pour cette portion : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=_KORd5DVpxhXCZGOWvfGtQ
Charles de Carto’Cité
bxl-forever (2020-08-23 16:19:25+00:00): Hello,
We had to revert this.
3 areas are the building structure, not the pitch inside it.  They should keep their building tags and sports_hall tag.
The 4th area the badminton pitch you changed into paddle_tennis → we kept your change.
ElliottPlack (2020-12-03 03:09:45+00:00): Hi Marc! I see this change comes via a DWG ticket. Just curious what that one was about? I surveyed the area four years back but did not see any signs about it being private. Certainly that could have changed now though.
marczoutendijk (2020-12-03 10:22:54+00:00): Hi Elliott, 
Yes, the track running from Loveton Farms Road is public, but from the crossing with the 2nd stream (on entering Pinewood Estates) it is (now) on private land, marked with signs. Hence the change.
ElliottPlack (2020-12-03 14:21:02+00:00): Got it. Did a homeowner contact the DWG? I'm just curious how the feedback loop works, because I map a lot of trails don't usually get much feedback. I am not opposed to the change at all, glad you did it, just wondering about the process. Thanks!
marczoutendijk (2020-12-04 09:15:08+00:00): Yes, the homeowner contacted the DWG.
Cases like this happen more and more these days because the AllTrails app (used by many hikers) is based on OSM. Land owners are complaining about trespassers.
Adamant1 (2020-06-20 04:35:32+00:00): Save the insults and personal attacks. I get enough of them from you on the Wiki. Looking at the usage numbers street_vendor had about 120 uses in April and it currently has 125. An increase of 5 clearly isn't "hundreds." That's just basic math. So couldn't have re-labeled hundreds of them. Which you could have figured out if you had of done a basic amount of research. 

I find the accusation of that and this being trolling especially galling since you just threatened Mateusz Konieczny for making a way more provable accusation then the one you've made here. 

Anyway, since shop=street_vendor has more uses now and is obviously the better tag, and you have zero ground to stand with your clearly wrongly accusation, I'm going to switch these back to it. There's zero point in going with a tag with almost zero uses, no proposal, and that doesn't allow for tagging what type of shop it is over one that doesn't have those problems. It's ridiculous that you think otherwise.
ajf3934221 (2020-06-05 20:07:22+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65849888
ajf3934221 (2020-06-05 20:15:36+00:00): Das vorliegende Resurvey konnte die bisher bekannten Einschätzungen weitgehend bestätigen. Insbesondere konnte die Positionsgenauigkeit verbessert werden.
eggie (2020-06-06 08:51:28+00:00): Van rechts naar links 
Hier was het meest oostelijke deel dus fout met dat kleine uitsteekseltje.. Geen mp relatie nodig. Dat heb ik hersteld.
De mp relatie verwijderd!!!
Het oostelijke stuk was wel goed, want daar is ook geen mp nodig. Geen ingesloten vlakken.
Het middelste stuk is goed, want daar ligt het vlak in de mp ingesloten en raakt niet de outer.
De rest rendert goed in het westelijke stuk. Ik zie geen bomen in het gras. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-06-06 08:52:35+00:00): Maar zo'n fout haal ik er dus uit met de validator van josm.
Mika van de wiel (2020-06-06 09:19:55+00:00): Dan zal ik daar maar eens verder mee gaan, maar dan kan je NOG meer verzoeken om iets te controleren krijgen... hahaha
eggie (2020-06-06 10:30:45+00:00): Nou.. ik denk minder.. want het gaat best goed..
Bovendien krijg je bij een upload in josm een waarschuwing als iets niet klopt.. 
Mapse en gr eggie
Mika van de wiel (2020-06-06 13:32:13+00:00): Ik ben nu bezig met JOSM en het werkt best goed, alleen kan ik twee punten die aan elkaar vast zitten niet los splitsen, hoe moet dit?
eggie (2020-06-06 14:38:27+00:00): P toets is splisen
G toets los vsn elkaar
M merge

A een lijn beginnen
S gebruik ik om de haverklap om het elastiekje te stoppen.
Ik zal je de shortcuts sturen...nu even op mn mobiel
eggie (2020-06-06 14:44:40+00:00): https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/josm/

en shortcuts

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/9/99/JOSM_Keyboard_shortcuts_cheat_sheet.png
lokejul (2020-06-09 23:52:33+00:00): I have a question about node 7596561337 which you tagged as amenity=monastery with name="Metal hazard".

I do not recall seeing a monastery in this marine location off East Beach in White Rock.

Did you mean a type of seamark instead?
user_5359 (2020-06-07 18:03:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You use an the key 3200. I assumed you mean the addr:housenumber=3200 and I changed this. Can you please verify this?
*abq* (2020-06-06 08:32:11+00:00): Du hast jetzt viele Wege, die vor einigen Jahren u.a. von Fischerhäusle und anderen eingetragen wurden, mit gelöscht. Das ist nicht Sinn der Sache. Es ging darum, die nicht überprüften Änderungen zu revertieren.
q_un_go (2020-06-06 12:24:12+00:00): Okay, 
ich habe das anhand der Versionshistorie in JOSM versucht und da wohl einige Wege zu viel gelöscht.
ich werde mich an Woodpeck wenden, dass er das Changeset von gestern und meines vom März, wo ich die Änderungen machte, revertiert. Dann sollte der Erstzustand drin sein.
q_un_go (2020-06-06 12:29:48+00:00): Bzw. ich habe noch einen OSM-Layer vom Stand Februar, ich denke, dass ich die Tracks dann wiederherstellen kann. Das sind ja alle, von denen ich nicht der Erstersteller war.
pangoSE (2020-12-02 21:11:48+00:00): Hej. 
Tack för ditt bidrag!
Jag ogillar spontant det här CS eftersom det är så stort och ihopblandad, vilket gör det riktigt svårt att genomskåda vad som ändrats var och varför och med vilket underlag. Skulle du kunna framöver dela upp i många små CS i stället?
Tack!
eggie (2020-06-05 20:50:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

review... Je hebt de toegangsweg iets langer gemaakt, maar dat zou voor de routering niets uit moeten maken.. behalve dat de track ons onverhard wordt gezien
MVG,
Eggie
Smunks (2020-06-05 21:06:27+00:00): Als ik in maps.me een fietsroute kies vanuit onze bungalow (huisje 83-51) naar Slenerweg 81, dan krijg ik als resultaat een omweg van 35 minuten via kibbelveen. Dit is niet juist, ik kan gewoon over de toegangsweg fietsen en wandelen.
eggie (2020-06-05 21:19:08+00:00): Oke...  Zal wellicht met de verharding te maken hebben.
De updates naar maps.me worden niet direct doorgevoerd in de routering denk ik. Zal wellicht even duren.
Gr eggie
Smunks (2020-06-05 21:25:40+00:00): Dank voor bericht.
alphensebezorger (2020-06-05 22:57:53+00:00): Hallo Smunks, 
en ook namens mij welkom bij OSM. Ik denk dat het probleem hier in de Slenerweg zit. Daar mag volgens OSM niet gefietst en gelopen worden. Er mist waarschijnlijk een oversteekje naar het fietspad, waardoor volgens OSM (en maps.me) de toegangsweg vanaf het bungalowpark hier doodloopt voor fietsers en voetgangers.
Als het fietspad wel te bereiken is vanaf het park, zou dezeerbinding ingetekend moeten worden om die 35 minuten te besparen.
Vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.
eggie (2020-06-06 05:17:36+00:00): Scherp Alphensebezorger. Ik heb de verbinding naar het fietspad  even ingetekend en de oude situatie hersteld. 
Het zal nu zeker routeren.
Bij camping De Riegheide speelt  eigenlijk hetzelfde probleem. Of daar wel een doorsteek is ....is maar de vraag.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-06 05:43:10+00:00): Serviceweg toch tot einde huisjes gezet.
gscscnd (2020-06-06 11:51:45+00:00): Tagi bicycle=yes i motor_vehicle=no są niepotrzebne (domyślne) na highway=path.
bxl-forever (2020-08-23 15:57:56+00:00): Hello,
Those roads are tagged with highway=trunk.
By default, they have all access restrictions for foot, bicycle and horse as "no".
There is no need spending time filling this information manually.  It adds no information to the database because those are the default access values.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Belgium
GmanBE (2020-08-26 22:10:48+00:00): Hello,
I made it because weirdly even with the highway=trunk, because bike router were telling me to take the RO even if it's an highway...
bxl-forever (2020-08-26 22:38:59+00:00): Strange.  What bike router are you using?  Neither OSRM nor GraphHopper seems to use trunk roads.
GmanBE (2020-08-26 22:44:19+00:00): I'm using http://brouter.de/brouter-web
Right now, I've made test and it's avoiding the RO
user_8334278 (2020-06-05 20:53:34+00:00): this is all gone it is a construction sit with a fence around it, it is not there gone, torn up, ect.
pangoSE (2020-06-10 19:13:52+00:00): Fantastiskt att se att du förbättrar kartan. Hojta till om du undrar något.
Frans S (2020-06-06 09:56:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please don't let nodes of buildings connect to each other,
Use the Ctr key during mapping to avoid that.
Best regards and keep mapping
dgitto (2020-06-06 05:08:01+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2020-06-06 05:11:39+00:00): In Italia, i numeri civici e tutti i tag relativi ad un indirizzo, non andrebbero sull'oggetto building, ma come nodi separati, posizionati dove c'è il numero civico.
Questo perché non vie è corrispondenza univoca tra edifici e indirizzi, ad esempio quando un palazzo ha parecchi ciivici (anche su strade diverse)
dgitto (2020-06-06 05:15:17+00:00): comunque nel tuo caso il problema è di minore importanza se è un condominio con unico numero civico.
Però la strada non deve contenere nel tag "name" altro che il nome. Anche perché altrimenti, per come lo hai inserito adesso, "name" e "addr:street" non coincidono tra loro
dgitto (2020-06-06 05:20:35+00:00): Io consiglierei di mettere tutti i tag relativi al condominio non sugli edifici (altrimenti risultano due "millennium park"), ma su un'area (landuse=residential) che rappresenta tutto il condominio, soprattutto se questa è effettivamente delimitata.
Sugli edifici vanno solo i tag relativi agli edifici in quanto tali (numero di piani, altezza, colore, ecc ecc).
guarda per esempio:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271462059
Luigi Manglaviti (2020-06-06 10:59:44+00:00): Ora ho reso unico il complesso residenziale evidenziando il perimetro che comprende i giardini e gli spazi comuni, e non solo le singole “stecche” di edifici.
Glassman (2020-06-06 00:04:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86262167
treestryder (2020-06-06 01:33:03+00:00): Curious. Last I checked, the MSU Union mostly brick, concrete foundation and a slate roof. Did I miss something?
Jules Mapme (2020-06-08 17:20:46+00:00): My error, you are correct. It has been changed back.
treestryder (2020-06-09 02:58:25+00:00): Very good. I error regularly. =)
Leo Slager (2020-06-06 09:55:36+00:00): Dit gaat een beetje fout.
Het eerste deel van de Kolkstraat tot aan de Bloemstraat is geen eenrichtingsverkeer.
Kijk eerst even of datgene wat je antwoordt ook correct is.
Streetcomplete heeft de neiging om je op het verkerde been te zetten met dit soort vragen.
ik pas het aan.
Glassman (2020-06-06 00:05:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86262429
user_5359 (2020-06-06 04:20:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! FreePN is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
Halbtax (2020-06-11 11:50:01+00:00): Hallo  sovereign_ch

Am letzten Freitag habe ich das Gleis  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120301077 als abandoned gekennzeichnet, weil dort keine Gleise mehr vorhanden waren. Jetzt habe ich bemerkt, dass du es zwei Stunden später wieder als aktuelles Gleis markiert hast. Sind da in der Zwischenzeit wieder Schienen verlegt worden? Woher hast du diese Information?

Gruss
sovereign_ch (2020-06-12 15:28:11+00:00): Hallo Halbtax, wie lange schreibst du solche Details aus bahninternen Dokumenten und nicht-freigegebenen Luftbildern ab? Selbst das RADN ist _nicht_ für die öffentliche Publikation gedacht, sondern für Berufsbähnler und mit einem entsprechenden Copyrightvermerk versehen.

Halte dich an die Grundregel, immer die 
einfachste mögliche Darstellung zu wählen, andernfalls werde ich mir nicht mehr die Mühe machen, korrekte Teile wiederherzustellen. Irgendwann ist mir die Zeit dafür schlicht zu schade.

Zudem sollte man nach vier Jahren in der Lage sein, präzise Änderungskommentare und Quellenangaben zu verfassen, und sich an etablierte und abgesegnete Regeln zu halten, anstatt sein Sonderzüglein zu fahren.

Das Detail ist korrigiert als Zeichen meines guten Willens. Mit dem Abzeichnen aus nicht-freigegebenen Luftbildern bewegst du dich allerdings auf sehr, sehr dünnem Eis. Cheers