piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HJS_Holten (2022-10-27 20:31:14+00:00): Beste J Tilia,

Dank voor het kritisch meekijken. Doel is natuurlijk dat OSM betrouwbaar is (d.w.z. juiste info bevat).

Tafeltennistafel: die heb ik niet aangetroffen. Ben ervan uitgegaan dat deze voor de winter is weggehaald. Zag maar hoe je dan moet vastleggen.
En Meeting Point stond met grote letters op het gebouw,. Heb ook geen moeite mee dat het weer verwijderd wordt in OSM.
Tilia_J (2022-10-30 14:18:27+00:00): Goedemiddag, heb de nodige aanpassingen gedaan, zie:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128248510
Frans S (2022-10-28 14:52:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128135554
gscholz (2022-10-28 09:25:50+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.64459&lat=38.54928&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128135682

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2022-10-28 14:53:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128135714
Frans S (2022-10-28 14:56:25+00:00): Hello. A remark
While mapping on a task, please do not upload each single building, but collect a numer or cluster of buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128135758
gscholz (2022-10-28 09:25:22+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.64459&lat=38.54928&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128135898

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-05 07:30:24+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl, 
this errors still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Frans S (2022-10-28 14:57:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128136122
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-16 11:22:18+00:00): note: you added some image tags linking to image from StreetComplete notes (for example in this changeset)

Sadly this images are not permanent and are scheduled to be deleted shortly after note is closed, and were never intended for long-term archiving.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#Are_the_pictures_taken_with_StreetComplete_permanent%3F for details.

You can use http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nOD to find remaining links in image tag, including what you added to OSM objects.

If you want to do something with them some may be still retrievable.

All such links are scheduled for removal (broken ones were already removed)
gscholz (2022-10-28 09:25:37+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.64459&lat=38.54928&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128136479

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Nzau (2023-04-29 06:42:35+00:00): Bonjour solcarlus5,

Encore moi ! 
Je me permets de corriger quelque tags, notamment sur les chemins aux abords des jardins familiaux.

Pour un chemin piéton, highway=footway est parfait, mais pas besoin de rajouter foot=yes, puisque les piétons sont forcément admis 😄 .

Si tu as des questions n'hésite pas !
Bonne journée.
gscholz (2022-10-28 09:27:36+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=29.21766&lat=37.67720&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128136880

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-01 07:26:57+00:00): Hi mrt_ortncl, 
this errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Elbubol2 (2022-10-27 17:09:15+00:00): Todo correcto
SHARCRASH (2022-10-27 16:23:54+00:00): +landuse split/detailed
HellMap (2022-10-28 11:19:57+00:00): Hi!

You set the building levels and roof levels to 0 in this edit. What kind of building is here? These values don't seem correct.
HellMap (2022-11-11 17:29:12+00:00): Hi again, 

Since you didn't reply and it's been a couple weeks, I have reverted/removed these 0 level values.
groberschnitzer (2022-11-04 09:33:27+00:00): Why are you making new relations for each stage of the trail? Has each stage its own marking on the trail? If not (i guess there is just one Hohe Tauern Panorama Trail sign along the trail) there should be only one single relation covering the complete trail.
Tatfahren (2022-10-29 21:03:25+00:00): Diesem Node fehlten noch einige Eigenschaften. Ich hab das jetzt mal nach meinem Wissen und dem des Wikis korrigiert.:

Laut der Webseite, welche ich gefunden habe, Handelt es sich um einen Juwelier. Dieser ist auch als Preset im ID vorhanden. Ich hab den jetzt als shop=jewelry eingetragen.

Die Öffnungszeiten sollten stets auf Englisch nach einem Vorgegebenen Schema eingetragen werden, damit die Anwendungen das richtig Interpretieren können. Ich habe diese jetzt laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours korrigiert.

Sonst sieht alles gut aus. Möglicherweise kann man den Node noch mit dem Gebäudeumriss verbinden und ein "entrance=main" beifügen, dann werden die Kunden je nach Anwendung direkt zum Eingang geroutet, z.B. wenn sich dieser im Innenhof befinden sollte.
wyk2 (2023-10-31 18:01:26+00:00): L'orthographe correcte est "Courtoy" et pas "Courtois". source: https://www.unamur.be/philo_lettres/namur/rues/courtoy.html
Dino Michelini (2022-10-28 07:42:11+00:00): Ti segnalo che in questo changeset sono state modificate le seguenti relazioni
CAI 103 Relation 11358057 Cammino Tuscia Tappa 3 https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=11358057
CAI 123 Relation 12562326 Sentiero dei 5 monti https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=12562326
Per favore ricostruisci le relazioni. Grazie
george1201 (2022-10-29 22:07:45+00:00): Wenn die Benutzung verboten ist, dann bitte access=no setzen. Aber doch die Wege nicht löschen, wenn sie in der Realität vorhanden sind!!!
george1201 (2022-10-29 23:07:24+00:00): Ist der Weg denn noch da? Oder möchtest du nur, dass man ihn nicht mehr in der Karte sieht?
Nakaner-repair (2022-10-30 10:25:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128239902 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 128138034 due to deletion instead of proper changes to the tags. This object will be resurveyed soon.
assmann265 (2022-10-30 17:17:15+00:00): Es handelt sich um einen Downhill-Trail, also keinen angelegten Weg, sondern einen, der durch häufiges befahren entstanden ist. Taucht der Weg denn noch auf der Karte auf, wenn man access = no setzt. Wenn ja, sollte der Track doch gelöscht werden, denn es ist ja gerade das Anliegen, dass diese Wegspuren wieder zuwachsen, da es sich ja um einen illegalen Weg handelt. Und dass sich die MTB-Fahrer nicht um Verbotsschilder kümmern ist leider vor Ort gut zu beobachten.
Nakaner (2022-10-30 17:20:33+00:00): Hallo,

der Fall wird derzeit im OSM-Forum diskutiert und ich werde im Rahmen einer Ortsbesichtigung in Kürze eine Entscheidung treffen. Bis dahin bitte ich noch um Geduld.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mtb-trail-geloscht-weil-nicht-offiziell/4794

Viele Grüße

Michael
eggie (2023-07-13 19:54:32+00:00): Beste BertMule.. Ook hier plak je de wegen vast aan de landuse = residential. Het advies vanuit de community is om dat niet te doen.
Je legt dat advis bewust naast je neer.
Doe een voorstel op het forum om te taggen zoals jij het graag ziet. Als we dan consensus krijgenm gaan we het allemaal zo doen. Zo werkt OSM en houden we de neuzen dezelfde kant op.
Graag reactie
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2023-01-18 10:21:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
A remark about tagging of a trace, previous tagged as an unclassified highway, has been re-tagged as a secondary highway, which serves as connections between towns.
Please read and follow the tagging info on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128138120
gscholz (2022-10-28 06:34:25+00:00): Hi Paras Thakkar,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database, first are self intersecting ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128138564

and the use of wrong highway types. Please educate yourself about the meaning of "secondary".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary

Kind regards
Gudi

Revert changeset 128138564 to fix self intersections and wrong street types
gscscnd (2022-10-27 20:28:35+00:00): „Usunąłem mapę” w komentarzu do zestawu zmian na OSM…
irik (2022-10-27 20:40:52+00:00): xD "mapę" w sensie tablica informacyjna z mapą tras rowerowych
gscholz (2022-10-28 06:36:39+00:00): Hi Paras Thakkar,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding wrong highway types:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128138768

Please educate yourself about the meaning of "secondary".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary

Kind regards
Gudo
aTarom (2022-12-28 17:32:39+00:00): Hola, Arturo
se trata de un descuido el tag
"inscription"="⛪" ?
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9381698590/history
Saludos y gracias por editar
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2023-01-05 12:37:35+00:00): Hola aTarom, la inscripción es el símbolo de una iglesia, por ello puse el emoji.
Un saludo
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-27 17:56:51+00:00): 1. Jak sam napisałeś drogi są zamknięte od 3 listopada a nie od dzisiaj więc zmiana trochę za wcześnie. Nawigacje teraz będą omijać te drogi.
2. Zobacz ten tag dla robót budowlanych https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:construction

To tyle, miłego mapowania!
lukasznie (2022-10-28 09:04:23+00:00): Dziękuje za wyjaśnienie. Wyczytałem gdzieś iż czas na zmianę  w mapach trwa do 2 tyg. Dlatego zaznaczyłem wcześniej.  Teraz wiem że zmiany wchodzą znacznie szybciej. 
Ogólnie nie zajmuję się mapowaniem jednak potrzebuję nanieść te zmiany aby nas system oparty o te mapy dobrze prognozował czasy dojazdów do klientów.
Czy mogę liczyć na Twoje wsparcie w oznaczeniu tych zmian ?
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-28 14:31:01+00:00): Zmiany w bazie danych osm pojawiają się od razu. Natomiast aktualizacja danych w systemie u Was zależy od waszego systemu. Jeśli miałbym zaznaczyć zmiany to proszę o informację co dokładnie będzie zamknięte, od kiedy do kiedy (może być orientacyjne) oraz link do jakiejś informacji potwierdzającej zamknięcie drogi.
Patr1k_P (2022-10-28 13:02:13+00:00): Keď je presťahovane, tak bod treba presunúť na správnu pozíciu a nie mazať
Rumburak7 (2022-10-28 13:53:07+00:00): Na spravnej pozicii to je uz dávno
Patr1k_P (2022-10-28 14:26:16+00:00): a kde je to miesto?
Rumburak7 (2022-10-28 14:46:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6793243105
Patr1k_P (2022-10-28 14:58:17+00:00): to ste poslali cosi ine, bavime sa o BigFite
Rumburak7 (2022-10-28 15:41:46+00:00): Aha, lebo aj Kinekus som tuším mazal. Ale Bigfit je zas tu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1728166818
Frans S (2022-10-28 15:00:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128139112
Frans S (2022-10-28 15:08:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128139246
Dodko (2022-10-30 19:27:06+00:00): Adresu Bačíkova 321/7, Košice-Staré Mesto má budova na západ
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/12650053?pos=48.725707,21.251402,18
vaša budova má iba súpisné číslo
Košice-Staré Mesto 3025
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13911001?pos=48.725970,21.252167,18

Treba požiadať mesto aby vám pridelilo orientačné číslo a ulicu.
NieWnen (2022-10-27 18:46:26+00:00): Ale już dodałem z uwagi i teraz są zdublowane. Po prostu się nie odświeżyło :).
NieWnen (2022-10-27 18:47:23+00:00): Poprawiłem.
Frans S (2022-10-28 15:11:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
As a Global Validator I review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to next points:

* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128139929
Frans S (2022-10-28 15:22:14+00:00): Another issue here.
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128140011
1998alexkane (2022-10-30 23:57:12+00:00): Should the sidewalks here also be tagged with access=private as well?
BPTT (2022-11-01 17:59:11+00:00): Great point! Probably, but I'm not sure - they're not gated or explicitly restricted in the same way the roadway itself is. https://goo.gl/maps/zoib8RGomWSaErsu7 What do you think?
Frans S (2022-10-28 15:21:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. I reviewed a number of your changesets.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128140537
Dodko (2022-10-30 19:16:37+00:00): Cesti ste spojili s hranicou okresu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10133111928 aj hranicu posunuli.

na highway=path je zbytočne pridávať
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
motor_vehicle=no
to už je automatické z povahy cestičky
Frans S (2022-10-28 15:25:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128140567
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-27 19:31:16+00:00): Hey Kevin,

This service way is signed as no right-turn, but it is also marked as "No Entry" with a one-sided solid line [2] and no-straight-on signs. This means neither directions of Main Street can enter this service way, but vehicles can leave from this service way onto main street. This indicates it is a one-way.

[1] (it is a dashed line in this case..)

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=459420645152738&focus=photo

The entry to the car park isn't explicitly signed as one-way, there are only two signs with arrows indicating where the car park is.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=300594074883921&focus=photo

However, if we look at the aerial imagery, we can vaguely see the end of the entrance service way (west or left side of the church) being marked as "No Entry" as well, meaning also the entrance is a one-way.

This means no turn restrictions should have to be applied at the entrance or exit of the car park, only the service way should be finished[2] and the oneway tag applied on the segments either side of the church.

[2] For ease, we can right click and reverse the service way in its entirety, so that when we apply the oneway tag it'll point in the right direction straight away.

At the back of the church, there are two service ways seperated by a pedestrian island. Only one of them appears to have a one-way arrow pointing towards the exit, the other done does not seem to have any markings and should therefore be left without oneway tag.

I may be able to revert this changeset for you if you'd like. This makes it easier to continue editing.

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-27 19:43:09+00:00): Ah, I had spotted this sign earlier, but now I know why the entrance way isn't marked as oneway. There's a service way going off from it to a school on the left, which means the first part of it is not a oneway.

(I can understand it if this lot is confusing.)
Frans S (2022-10-28 15:15:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
As a Global Validator I review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings on all changeset you issued are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.

* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
* Quality prevails over quantity
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128140776
Tatfahren (2022-10-29 20:44:40+00:00): Du hast die Adresse ziemlich nah an dem Gebäudeumriss platziert. Ist hier der Eingang?, dann verbinde diese doch mit dem Umriss, und füge ein "entrance=main" hinzu. 

Bei der Nummer 10 hast du vergessen die Nummer anschließend aus dem Gebäudeumriss zu löschen. Ich mach das jetzt mal.
rheiner_junge (2022-10-29 21:02:44+00:00): Hallo Tatfahren,

ja, das stimmt, da ist der Eingang.
Vielen Dank für die Änderung und den Hinweis.
Bin blutiger Anfänger. Wie funktioniert das mit der Verbindung zum Gebäudeumriss?
Mit dem Eintrag „entrannen=Main“ werde ich mir dann in der von Ihnen durchgeführten Änderung ansehen.
Gruß rheiner_junge
Tatfahren (2022-10-29 21:10:48+00:00): Den zu verbindenden Punkt einfach mit der Linken Maustaste auf den Gebäudeumriss ziehen. Dann mache ich das mal bei der 10, dann kannst du das mit der 16 probieren.

Es ist auch nicht verpflichtend die Eingänge einzutragen, nach dem was ich von anderen Mappern gelernt habe, ist das aber derer (und nun auch meiner Meinung) nach die Beste Methode, Denn normalerweise will man ja an den Hauseingang geroutet werden.