piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2017-01-15 19:34:34+00:00): Du har været flittig i dag :-).
Jeg har iøvrigt tilføjet lidt flere tags til bygningen her såvel som til Reberbanen.
Torben Andersen (2017-01-15 20:37:11+00:00): Tak.
Helt fint hvis du har rettelser/tilføjelser.
scai (2017-01-15 18:18:38+00:00): "(aktuell Flüchtlingsunterkunft)" ist doch nicht der offizielle Name, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
scai (2017-01-15 18:25:32+00:00): Hab es korrigiert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2962752845

Weißt du ob die Psychiatrie jetzt komplett raus ist bzw. verlegt wurde? Oder hatte das sowieso nicht mehr gestimmt?
t_ja (2017-01-15 19:16:38+00:00): Ahoj,
cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466095563 vyzera, ze je len posunutou kopiou https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118101034 . Dobre je to vidiet na https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45191844 . Mozes si to prosim opravit?

T.
georgo21 (2017-01-25 09:14:14+00:00): Ahoj,

nestihol som sa k tomu dostat, ale vidim, ze si to uz opravil. Dakujem
scai (2017-01-15 18:18:23+00:00): "(aktuell Flüchtlingsunterkunft)" ist doch nicht der offizielle Name, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
scai (2017-01-15 18:19:48+00:00): Sry, das war für https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45191835 gemeint.

Hier: "(dauerhaft geschlossen)" ist auch nicht der offizielle Name. Und wenn etwas zu ist, dann bitte nicht weiter als Cafe lassen sondern disused davor setzen. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:

Ich mach das hier mal.
scai (2017-01-15 18:22:34+00:00): Kannst es dir hier nochmal anschauen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1701411124
samely (2017-01-16 22:19:35+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, looks like you made a double trace for an existing road. Can you check it please?
Regards,
Eliane
PT-53 (2017-01-18 09:30:00+00:00): Hallo Stauros1980,
Du hast diesen Weg - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466099290#map=18/47.99737/9.47686 - neu eingezeichnet, der eine Straße überquert, aner nicht mit dieser Verbunden ist. keep right zeigt deshalb jetzt diese Fehlermeldung an: http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=81481134
Kümmerst Du Dich darum ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-01-18 09:38:31+00:00): Dieser Weg - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466099304#map=18/47.99781/9.48152 - ist als cycleway eingetragen und dieser Weg - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466099295 - als track eingetragen. Das paßt nicht zusammen.
Sollte das ein Geh- und Radweg sein, wäre path die richtige Klassifikation.
Wer darf dort denn fahren und gehen ?
PT-53 (2017-01-20 12:32:10+00:00): Hallo Stauros,
Du hast ja die o.g. Punkte entspr. korrigiert.
Für micht ist noch unklar, ob dieser Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466099290/history wirklich ein Feldweg (track) ist. Ich halte ihn eher für einen Geh- und Radweg (path). Stehen dort vielleicht entspr. Verkehrszeichen ?
Für Radfahrer wäre es immer auch interessant, bei tracks und paths Informationen über die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit zu erhalten. Diese kann man mit surface (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface) und smoothness (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness) beschreiben. Sind Deine Ortskenntnisse ausreichend dafür ?
Grüße
Mapeiro (2017-01-18 12:07:33+00:00): Acho que vale a pena também entrar em contato com o usuário JocsaSaoBonifácioJW explicando os erros dele. É provável que ele nem perceba as suas correções posteriores.

Fiz isso uma vez, explicando sobre o uso incorreto do termo "areia e pedras" (assim, em português) no tipo de superfície e no uso do highway=residential para estradas rurais e pelo que vi ele não repetiu esses erros (apesar de não ter me respondido)
SomeoneElse (2017-01-29 23:20:28+00:00): Hello,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4609905889 really a "chalet", or is it just somewhere that you were staying run by someone called Celia?
Best Regards,
Andy
Владимир К (2017-09-05 11:58:46+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3812765813

а вот тут ref=2м это случайно?
corfede (2017-01-22 16:51:02+00:00): Ciao Fabrizio, sicuramente per errore con questo changeset si era spostata una power tower che ho ripristinato in base a Bing (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2079949978).
sbiribizio (2017-01-22 17:21:25+00:00): Grazie
Alexander-II (2017-03-16 05:03:56+00:00): Вы в этой правке сломали мультиполигон https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1902760#map=17/55.77476/37.84959
Исправьте, пожалуйста.
GinaroZ (2017-01-15 23:37:13+00:00): Does Sandy Road actually connect to the B9157? Don't remember seeing a proper entrance, but I haven't been past there in a while.
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 20:47:45+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik je toevoeging gedeeltelijk verwijderd. De adresnode was reeds aanwezig op OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2834497787
https://www.dropbox.com/s/20muwaf5fe7f8cw/2017-01-15_21-46-50.png?raw=1
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
ndm (2017-01-15 16:02:48+00:00): Slightly concerned as you need to be very careful not to add information from copyrighted maps in OpenStreetmap.
DaveF (2017-01-15 16:33:49+00:00): Is the A38 - A370 part of the opening?
Is it being classified as a trunk road?
DaveF (2017-01-15 16:37:52+00:00): Why have you deleted the foot & cycle paths?
Spanholz (2017-01-15 20:14:41+00:00): Please only add real existing stuff to OpenStreetMap.
chillly (2017-01-15 19:39:45+00:00): Hi,
You need to add a tag to describe the object type, such as shop = supermarket or shop = convenience, so the correct symbol appears on the map
tosky (2017-01-15 16:23:53+00:00): Please add he "operator" tag to the post office (which is clearly not Poste Italiane). Also, is the information point really called "Edicola"?
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
tosky (2017-01-15 16:18:18+00:00): The name:it is wrong (it should have only characters), and if I translated it correctly also the ru name is not the translitteration of "Pompi", so I'm going to revert the change. Please pay attention when you modify tags in a public map.
74523978 (2017-01-15 16:14:03+00:00): Gezien, klopt allemaal.
Paul De Kantelaar (2017-01-15 16:14:56+00:00): Mooi zo, bedankt.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
GerdP (2017-08-25 11:53:31+00:00): Hi!
Please review: You've mapped some highway=passing_place as ways instead of nodes on Carr Moss Lane. You just have to add a note on the road and tag it 
highway=passing_place.
mot_tom (2017-10-27 19:13:38+00:00): Hi RhodimusPrime
Having looked on Bing maps, it seems like there's a building here, so I'm a little confused as to why you've added a footpath here. I've edited this footpath way to become a building, but if this is incorrect by all means correct it. Many thanks, mot_tom
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:27:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Noen (2017-01-19 19:16:02+00:00): Du har gjort en bra arbeide med å legge til :lanes tagging!

Det ser ser ut til at du misbruker eller har misforstått _link taggingen. Den skal brukes på ramper til et planskilt kryss. Den kan også brukes på filterfelt, som er en adskilt høyresving utenom en rundkjøring eller et lyskryss.

Men _link taggen skal ikke brukes på alle veier som er tilknyttet en motorvei, som ved Ullensplitten
NKA (2017-01-19 21:35:01+00:00): Takk for tilbakemeldingen - det er nyttig.
Skal ikke den ene av de to møtende motorveiene i Y-krysset øst for Østre Aker kirke tagges motorway_link? Her er det jo rampe til et planskilt kryss. Ser at det er gjort slik i mange Y-kryss der to motorveier møtes i Europa (men ikke alle).
Og ellers får vi her et Y-kryss der alle tre veier er motorway og alle har ref=E 6. Dette har jeg selv sett skaper problemer for navigasjons-app´er, som ikke kan avgjøre hvilken vei som skal regnes som avkjøring kontra "rett frem".
Men dette var ikke viktig for meg, vi kan gjerne endre tilbake, og igjen - takk for kommentarer.
Noen (2017-01-20 14:05:41+00:00): Jeg har også sett begge deler rundt omkring, men her tror jeg du har rett. Dvs. at rampene opp til Ulvensplitten i øst skal være motorway_link.
NKA (2017-01-20 16:25:10+00:00): Da har jeg oppdatert Ulvensplitten slik at det er link i hver ende og normal motorway og trunk i mellom. Du får gjerne sjekke at det ble som forventet.
unia (2017-01-15 16:50:32+00:00): *Kuusirinteentie
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:28:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:29:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:27:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
HoloDuke (2017-01-18 08:04:08+00:00): Warum hast Du beim Schlossplatz (way 246175053) highway=* entfernt?
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:27:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
Hjart (2017-01-15 18:35:56+00:00): Hesselkildegaard var i forvejen angivet, så jeg har slettet din version. Desuden har du lavet noget med husnummer på Stengården som jeg ikke helt forstår.
literan (2017-01-16 12:11:54+00:00): для турникета правильный тег barrier=turnstile. Поправлю.
Alexander-II (2017-01-15 17:31:03+00:00): Зачем вы изменили тип дороги с residential на track? Там каким-то образом появилось поле и начала ездить сельскохозяйственная техника? Выглядит как вандализм.
Alexander-II (2017-01-15 17:31:27+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=track?uselang=ru

Не следует использовать данный вариант для обозначения именованных дорог и дорог, образующих соединительную сеть и/или используемых для передвижения несельскохозяйственной/лесной техники и/или людей. В таких случаях следует использовать highway=unclassified или highway=residential и уточнять тип покрытия/проходимость/характеристику дороги с помощью тегов smoothness=*, surface=* и/или width=*.
Alexander-II (2017-01-15 20:11:41+00:00): Откатил изменения по дорогам.
mueschel (2017-01-16 20:11:38+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du hier mal nach dem Tagging schauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464578456
Ich kann es leider nicht korrigieren, weil ich nicht weiß welche Art von Lift es ist:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aerialway

Gruß, Jan
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 20:28:41+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Constable (2017-01-16 12:31:07+00:00): ciao, guarda che hai creato due officine ma sembra che in realtà ne esista solo una, giusto?
Rimuovi uno dei due nodi (punti) ed inserisci tutti i tag (nome, indirizzo, orari, operatore, contatti,...) nel nodo restante.
se hai bisogno di aiuto scrivi qua.
grazie
user_5359 (2017-01-15 18:54:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Normally a footway can't a name.
user_5359 (2017-01-15 18:54:34+00:00): can't -> hasn't
Constable (2017-01-16 12:33:07+00:00): ciao, quello che hai inserito è davvero un belvedere? ha davvero quel nome?
chiedo perché è capitato molte volte di vedere utenti mapsme che aggiunevano viewpoint per indicare cose che non erano dei belvedere.
grazie
Spanholz (2017-01-15 20:19:37+00:00): Can you connect the trails to the streets please. Only if they are connected a routing will work
Spanholz (2017-01-15 20:19:46+00:00): and welcome to OSM
vichada (2017-01-16 05:17:17+00:00): Sorry wrong Changeset comment. Should be:

#hotosm-project-2261 #TanzaniaDevelopmentTrust #Tanzania #missingmaps 

and source: Bing imagery
gendy54 (2017-01-15 18:31:35+00:00): Ca y est, c'est en place? Cool!
Alexander-II (2017-01-17 05:00:00+00:00): "Кафе" - это наименование заведения? Если нет, то не нужно писать его в name.
GerdP (2018-11-02 13:56:38+00:00): Hi! I just changed some ways imported by you where island / islet in fresh water where tagged with natural=coastline. Please check 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=coastline
before using this tag again.
See e.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64114025
GerdP (2018-11-02 15:22:12+00:00): I did that quite often now, esp. here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64115009
Hope I did not change something good.
Peda_repair (2017-01-31 22:54:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
Peda_repair (2017-01-31 22:54:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
CupIvan (2017-03-20 17:19:45+00:00): зачем убрали building:part у зданий?
вот схема тегирования: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building:part
letihu (2017-01-18 11:23:38+00:00): Warum sind denn hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4610351089/history
alle Verbindungen der Straßen miteinander gelöst (gewesen)?
user_5359 (2017-01-16 16:49:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What ist the meaning of the key operator=home (Node-id 4630336000). If this is your private phone number: Please notice: Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!

I must delete your entry, if you didn’t answer this question.
literan (2017-01-16 11:36:03+00:00): Здесь правильные теги будут crossing=uncontrolled
highway=crossing

zebra - это тег для Британии, у них там разные типы переходов разными животными названы. А у нас "зебра" рисуется на любом переходе - что регулируемом, что нет.
alesarrett (2023-04-27 09:55:27+00:00): Ciao Andrea, nel changeset 135419715 ho aggiunto il tag building=yes all'intero corpo dell'edificio, perché c'erano i due building:part ma mancava quello che metteva insieme l'intero edificio.  Concordi con la modifica?
Gh0stz0x (2023-04-29 17:47:01+00:00): Si scusami, è stata una mia dimenticanza.
Grazie, sei stato molto gentile.
Ciao Andreas
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 22:20:57+00:00): Nee volgens mij niet. Ik dacht dat ik de bewuste postbus vanuit de revert laag gekopieerd had naar een andere laag. Vermoedelijk werkt dit niet zo. Of ik heb iets verkeerd gedaan.  Van mij mag je het herstellen als je wil. Anders kijk ik morgen even
74523978 (2017-01-15 23:09:12+00:00): Snap ik ook niet, doe niks met reverts, mocht ik het ooit nodig hebben vraag ik jou wel :-) Ik kan het gebouw ook niet terug plaatsen want ik doe ook (nog) geen BAG imports. Jij bent dus de kandidaat dit op te lossen...
alphensebezorger (2017-01-16 00:19:00+00:00): Ik heb het gewiste gebouw teruggezet (met de JOSM undelete plug-in) in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45203705. Ik was over die stomme brievenbus begonnen, kan ik ook wel iets terugdoen.
74523978 (2017-01-16 00:44:45+00:00): Bedankt voor de assistentie alphensebezorger.
Commodoortje (2017-01-16 03:19:41+00:00): Top
Firefishy (2017-01-15 23:22:42+00:00): Thank you for help in improving OpenStreetMap. Your local knowledge is greatly appreciated.
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:47:02+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:48:27+00:00): Loopt het voetpad wel tussen 45 en 47t door? 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466182391

https://www.dropbox.com/s/nhkgookfqkeohru/2017-01-15_22-44-48.png?raw=1
SomeoneElse (2020-12-29 14:03:28+00:00): Hello TenrojimaSenju,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 4 years ago(!).  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4610591172 was added with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM (and your changeset comment here would suggest that).

If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-01-16 23:14:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 97622374 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets in which Google was used as a source.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45199032 .
Hjart (2017-01-16 08:45:08+00:00): Butik og cafe er adskilte her fordi det ellers ikke rigtig kan lade sig at vise på kortet at stedet både er en butik og en cafe
Hjart (2017-01-15 21:06:35+00:00): Dette var bare en meningsløs krusedulle og derfor har jeg slettet den
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:52:08+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 21:53:38+00:00): Zal ik je wat hulp aanbieden om dit stukje te verbeteren?
Nu zijn de bestaande landuses gebruikt, het is hier beter om één park contour te maken met de naam van het park erop evt. website ed.
daarnaast denk ik dat er nog meer paden door het park lopen die aangebracht zouden kunnen worden.
Ik hoor je reactie wel.
FahRadler (2017-01-19 14:51:12+00:00): hier hast einen Feldweg zum Fußweg gemacht - wird revertiert
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 22:00:21+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
chillly (2017-01-15 21:31:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM,
You seem to have added a meadow over the top of a building. This seems rather unlikely. You might not have realised that you were saving to the public version of OSM. Would you like some help cleaning this up?

If you want any help editing OSM please feel free to ask.
SK53 (2017-01-15 21:49:15+00:00): There is indeed no meadow here: maybe a patch of grass in the hall courtyards, in which case landuse=grass, grass=amenity_grassland. However, I have generally avoided mapping grassy areas in the campus as it makes things rather complicated: and as it's a campus grass can be considered a reasonable default.
chillly (2017-01-15 21:33:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

You seem to have added a bit of a crude, overlapping footway. where there already is a cycleway. Perhaps you were experimenting and didn't realise you were saving to the public OSM. Do you need any help cleaning this up?
Firefishy (2017-01-15 23:21:02+00:00): Awesome. Great first contribution. Thank you for adding your valuable knowledge to the map.
chillly (2017-01-15 21:36:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

Thanks for the detail. We normally add a name tag when there is a sign naming something. Public Footpath is a useful sign but we add a special tag designation=public_footpath.
BCNorwich (2017-01-16 07:53:04+00:00): Yes Welcome, what you've actually added is a duplication of an existing way. It's been on the OSM database for several years and is on the Vespucci map. As such it adds nothing extra to the database (except for several of your new descriptions, which I might argue about), thus it ought to be removed.
We await your thoughts.
Regards
FahRadler (2017-01-19 14:49:11+00:00): Hier hast du das Hotel Angelo 350m nach Norden verschoben.
Was ein Fussweg ist weisst du ja jetzt.

Ich revertiere diese Änderungen
AprilMJ (2017-01-15 21:33:26+00:00): building (my first)
BCNorwich (2017-01-16 08:02:50+00:00): I'm sorry but I don't think that the playing field nor the football pitch is named "Briston pavillion". The clubhouse building east of the field might be.
BCNorwich (2017-01-16 08:08:41+00:00): Please don't let the comments on your first OSM mapping deter you, everyone makes mistakes (especially me). There is a lot to learn and there's lots of help on the web. If you think I can help please just ask.
Johnny Mapperseed (2017-01-16 06:42:34+00:00): Yo! Why is Kent State marked here? They build a new campus or something?

Thanks for your help man! :D
bazbazbaz (2017-01-16 14:36:35+00:00): The Summit County auditor's website shows that this land is owned by Kent State University; but, regarding any further information about it, I have no idea.
Commodoortje (2017-01-16 04:08:45+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-16 04:12:24+00:00): Ik zie dat je een voetpad aangebracht hebt. 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466200909
Een tip:
Het voetpad sluit niet aan op de pintol en heeft een parallelle loop tov de ganzemars. Vermoedellijk is er een mogelijkheid om vanaf het voetpad het fietspad op te stappen.
.
zie onderstaande plaatjes.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/acx8wjaco9iyqux/2017-01-16_05-07-09.png?raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jdhzn0lwn2memck/2017-01-16_05-08-17.png?raw=1
.
Hierbij bied ik aan om je te helpen.
Felipe Alves (2017-01-18 15:22:04+00:00): Oi, Santos. O que quis representar aqui? Não vejo nenhum posto de gasolina nas imagens de satélite...
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-24 17:46:53+00:00): Hallo jagdpächter, willkommen bei OSM. 

Könntest du bei deinen "Ergänzungen und Korrekturen" bitte immer versuchen die vorhandenen Wege entsprechend zu ändern, anstatt sie einfach zu löschen und neu einzutragen? Dies zerstört die komplette Historie. 

Siehe dazu bitte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-16 18:22:19+00:00): Hi Dannyfm, welcome to OSM. Could you please explain your map edits? Seems like some fictive data.
BCNorwich (2017-01-16 08:27:57+00:00): The number suggests a triangulation pillar then type=triangulation can be added. Please see here :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point
Regards