piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-22 12:33:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-22 12:37:14+00:00): Please don't add wrong data to OSM for any reason! 
It sounds like you should file a report at https://github.com/chadrockey/TGC-Designer-Tools/issues
eggie (2022-03-15 21:33:11+00:00): 
Zie
bollard=fixed 
(cannot be (re)moved, rotated or lowered, not even with a key or tool)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=bollard

emergency=no lijkt me niet correct en voegt niets toe.
De routingapp zal het moeten doen met de tagging conform OSM wiki.
Dus 
bollard=fixed
MVG
eggie
Kovoschiz (2022-03-28 03:46:52+00:00): Please don't detach points from `natural=ridge`.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-28 04:40:03+00:00): 2. Please don't use `=peak` if it isn't a high point over the entire surrounding.
salma_z (2022-03-16 12:03:36+00:00): Hello Arie den Boon;
I noticed you added missing streets near Maïbogo but it's disconnected with any streets.
Could you connected theses streets with near streets ?
Examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040645834
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040645834
Thank you for make OpenStreetMap much better.
Regards
salma_z
user_5359 (2022-03-16 14:31:48+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165691140. What is the meaning of the tag do = 2022.01.22. Please notice also the standard date format YYYY-MM-DD.
mapowicz_pl (2022-03-17 00:03:56+00:00): Hi. I don't know, what does this tag mean. I corrected location of AED only. I removed old point and created new point with tags from old point - that's all.
This tag looks like polish word (in english "to"). I suppose, it can be date when this AED was removed from old location.
mapowicz_pl (2022-03-17 00:21:31+00:00): Mystery solved. It was name of directory copied into clipboard. Probably I pressed Ctrl+V when josm was active and it was pasted as tag.
I removed this tag. Now should be ok. Check if you want to verify.
Inochi03 (2022-07-23 08:25:37+00:00): Ta jadłodajnia znajduje się na ulicy Taczaka w Poznaniu, nie w Koziegłowach.
Inochi03 (2022-07-23 08:26:00+00:00): https://caritaspoznan.pl/placowki/jadlodajnia-caritas-pw-sw-urszuli-ledochowskiej
Dawid2849 (2022-08-15 11:22:16+00:00): Hm, faktycznie. Nie wiem jak to się stało, że dodałem ją w Koziegłowach. Przepraszam za błąd i dziękuję za usunięcie tego błędnego POI z mapy.
szydzio (2022-03-24 08:40:46+00:00): Hej! Czy ta lokalizacja jest na pewno poprawna ? Adres Zielona Góra, Stanisława Staszica 9 jest całkowicie gdzie indziej, tutaj => https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.94689/15.51985
iwonaceae (2022-03-24 22:25:06+00:00): Racja. Już poprawiam. Dzięki!
mweper (2022-03-16 11:15:55+00:00): - Hola. ¿Conoces si realmente se encuentra activo este edificio como parte de la escuela Joan Miró? 
- Si es el caso que el terreno se encuentra activamente utilizado por la misma institución, se debería añadir todo el terreno como amenity=school. 
- Pero solo en el caso de que realmente se encuentren dando clases allí.
- La ultima vez que pasé por allí, parecía todo abandonado (inactivo).
GLTec (2022-03-23 12:40:50+00:00): Hola, esta funcionando la secundaria, primer y segundo año, de la escuela Joan Miró.
- Entiendo que es una parte del terreno pero aún no está delimitado
-Están dando clases diariamente.
mweper (2022-03-23 13:10:49+00:00): Hace unos días pasé por allí y comprobé que hay actividad allí. Hice algunos cambios y mejoras. 
También vi un cartel de venta para una parte del terreno, así que habría que modificar bien ese sector y saber cual corresponde a la escuela.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-15 21:00:11+00:00): Oops!  Wrong account.  This change was reverted as part of a DWG complaint - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5773 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5774 and shuld have been done using http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse_Revert .  Sorry about that!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-18 05:27:38+00:00): These features shouldn't be connected in several locations
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118527389
stst415 (2022-03-18 05:51:38+00:00): Hi Spaghetti Monster… I have always believed in you!  In regards to your comment, I know what you mean and I know how I’d do the corrections.  First, though, does it make a difference that this undeveloped street actually has signage??  Yes, strangely, there’s at least one “Orchard Trail” sign out there labeling this ghost street.  I checked the property records and saw the right-of-way meant to be there….
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-18 10:43:57+00:00): Please fix
stst415 (2022-03-18 13:39:30+00:00): Done!
kubahahaha (2022-03-16 16:56:27+00:00): Hmm, you messed up something - members of relation without role?
building:levels=6 on relation?
Leo Slager (2022-03-19 10:50:14+00:00): Hallo jozin,
Wat de laatste weken opvalt is het aantal fouten wat je maakt.
Er worden tal vam dubbele ways op de kaart gezet, duplicate nodes en zich zelf kruisende ways.
Het effect is dat die gebouwen van de kaart verdwijnen.
Zie hiernaast bijv Kempenstraat 220.
Zijn dat fouten die je zelf maakt ?
Of worden die door MapComplete veroorzaakt.
Om een beter beeld van de fouten te krijgen kun je hier even kijken:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.44338&lat=50.93239&zoom=18&opacity=0.73
En kijk dan even hier:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.43022&lat=50.93062&zoom=14&opacity=0.73
En het gaat maar door:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.96476&lat=51.13250&zoom=12&opacity=0.73
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.26070&lat=50.76197&zoom=12&opacity=0.73
jozin-belgium (2025-07-10 20:24:19+00:00): Ik lees dit bericht nu pas omdat mijn emailadres gewijzigd is. MapComplete heeft deze fouten gemaakt. Tegenwoordig vergelijk ik MapComplete met OSM recente luchtfoto en OSM GRB.
eggie (2022-03-15 21:55:27+00:00): Thanks.
gr eggie
ScottNelson (2023-02-04 06:50:49+00:00): This changeset added way 1040659049 which I think is actually a snowmobile trail according to the Sovereign Lake Nordic and Vernon Snowmobile association maps.  I don't ski here regularly so I'm not confident about what's going on.  Is this segment a special part of the sovereign2silverstar loppet only and not one of the regular Sovereign Lake XC trails?  If so I wonder if there is a way to indicate this in the tagging?
BasKisk (2023-02-04 15:04:09+00:00): The last few years this is not a snowmobile trail. It is a Nordic trail, though infrequently used. The relation denotes it as part of the Sovereign2Silverstar. It would be inappropriate to map it as anything else
ottwiz (2022-03-15 21:30:53+00:00): I also used Esri World Imagery for tracing the creek but for some reason I forgot to include it. My apologies
dieterdreist (2023-07-13 11:51:15+00:00): Ciao Leonardo Moretti, ho notato che hai cancellato questa relazione perché era un doppione di https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10351210 
Generalmente cerchiamo di mantenere sempre l'oggetto più vecchio (per avere tipicamente lo storico più completo e per "onorare" chi ha fatto il primo passo). Lascerei perdere in questo caso, ma per il futuro ti chiedo di guardare gli id e preferire l'id più piccolo, che automaticamente sarà quello più vecchio.

Grazie e un saluto,
Martin
Leonardo Moretti (2023-07-13 22:04:03+00:00): Ciao Martin, 
nel caso specifico la relazione cancellata aveva una sola way membro, mentre quella rimasta ne aveva oltre 30 e mi sembrava in generale più completa e aggiornata.
Se però il criterio deve essere preservare l'ID più basso (e quindi la relazione più vecchia) non lo sapevo ma mi adeguo, anche se non essendoci funzioni di merge questo potrebbe voler dire (come in questo caso) un lavoro manuale in più per riportare i dati più completi e aggiornati sulla vecchia relazione.
Se ricordo bene al tempo non mi sembra di aver trovato nella wiki di OSM una linea guida per questo tipo di correzioni (ricordo di aver visto anche nodi duplicati ad esempio, oppure way palesemente inesistenti e mai esistite). Sai se è stata aggiunta nel frattempo ed eventualmente dove la trovo?

Grazie e un saluto,
Leonardo
dieterdreist (2023-07-14 08:26:29+00:00): Buongiorno Leonardo,

grazie per la risposta veloce. Capisco il ragionamento della relazione più dettagliata e lunga, con più versioni ecc.. Il punto con l'id più piccolo è che chi ha creato il doppione (id più alto) ha sbagliato perché avrebbe dovuto modificare la relazione già esistente e invece per una svista ha creato un nuovo oggetto. In ogni modo, non parliamo di veri e propri errori, piùttosto dettagli "morbidi". Il mio suggerimento è quello di "premiare" sempre chi c'è stato per primo (id piccolo), perché è semplice e nel caso di doppioni chi viene dopo ha introdotto l'errore del doppione.

Al livello pratico, in JOSM puoi procedere così: seleziona la relazione dalla quale vuoi prendere i tag, poi fai "copia" e apri la relazione dove vuoi incollare i tag, premi il pulsante "incolla tag" nel relation editor. Invece per i membri, vai di nuovo nel relation editor con la relazione da cancellare, seleziona tutti i membri nella colonna sinistra nel editor, e con il pulsante "freccia verso sinistra" selezioni tutti i membri sulla mappa. Poi torni all'altro relation editor e aggiungi i membri (che sono ancora selezionati sulla mappa). Descrivendolo può sembrare complicato, ma sono pochi secondi / 3 click.

Invece per controllare se tutto fosse andato bene, ti consiglio la visualizzazione dello storico di JOSM, seleziona la relation (esempio seleziona una way, nella finistra tag click a destra sulla relazione (in basso) e scegli "seleziona relazione". Poi con ctrl+H si apre la vista dello storico (probabilmente già lo sapevi) che consente di vedere bene le modifiche.

Buona mappatura,
Martin
SekeRob (2022-03-16 11:32:38+00:00): Hi Andrew

Don't know why you left the park outline unclosed/unfinished but OSM Inspector flagged. Fixed in Change set #118547691

ciao
mrpulley (2026-02-28 08:27:55+00:00): Confirming that maxspeed is correct here (checked at survey)
SomeoneElse (2022-03-17 12:20:38+00:00): Hello andrewpmk,
What actually was the change here?
The reason that I ask is that Osmose is notorious for false positives - with a DWG hat on I recently had to revert quite a lot of "Osmose-only" changes in Europe because it had corrupted names.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
FbrG (2022-03-15 23:02:02+00:00): Details am Leopoldring
WoodWoseWulf (2022-03-15 23:39:57+00:00): Hi ilikepizza123321,

You seem to be adding a lot of features that are already on the map.

OSM typically works off the concept of the concept of one feature, one OSM element: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

For example, you've added Circle Park as a node when it was already mapped as an area.
martinst (2022-03-16 20:49:49+00:00): building=yes gehört wieder ergänzt, oder?
user_2066394 (2022-03-16 21:24:48+00:00): Stimme ich zu, das war allerdings bereits der Vorbearbeiter :-)
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/81426688

Ist korrigiert.
plennert (2023-01-03 14:31:25+00:00): Hey Xanadu_Contractor
to node: 9581823022
does the sprinkler_connection belong to the church?
Allison P (2024-02-03 23:48:28+00:00): "AVenue" extant for 22 months. Oops.
user_5359 (2022-03-16 14:24:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320753356. What is the meaning of the tag c = Boulevard de Bonne-Espérance
Martin868 (2022-03-16 14:29:40+00:00): Typo probably doing a concatenation (merge) with the mouse in the name box. Thanks for reporting I will fix it.
wireguy (2022-03-16 12:06:33+00:00): hi YVM,  this change broke the relation for STEM Academy.
Can you look into correcting it?
Your Village Maps (2022-03-16 17:20:19+00:00): Yes, I will do that. I think the best way would be to delete the relation and make a new one. I am not sure how that is done in iD? I know how to remove things from a relation, but not how to delete the relation itself.
wireguy (2022-03-16 17:33:27+00:00): way 1040681086 isn't closed.   you could just remove it from the relation (and delete it), and then extend way 1040681089 to cover the rest of the parking.
FJili (2022-04-05 16:13:22+00:00): 您好，鲁泰大道在卫星图上看起来已经通车，查了资料的确多年前已经通车，请问改成建设中是有依据的吗？ 谢谢
不知名的番茄 (2022-04-05 16:37:54+00:00): 您好，淄博鲁泰大道快速路为淄博市快速路网改建工程之一，于2021年5月18日正式动工，目前尚在全封闭建设中，详细内容可在各大搜索引擎查询。因此地图修改并无问题，你看到的卫星图可能是2021年5月18日之前拍摄的。
不知名的番茄 (2022-04-05 16:38:16+00:00): 以上内容回复楼上
CorruptComputer (2022-03-16 14:23:09+00:00): Please remember to check your warnings: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-84.68312&lat=34.07273&zoom=18&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1

These two ways that should be connected are not connected. 

Its an easy fix so I can do it if you'd like, just wanted to let you know.
drivec (2022-05-11 00:36:25+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:41:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
singleton (2022-03-24 18:01:13+00:00): Hi, Pashan-Sus Bridge is still under construction. Please change it back to construction.
user_5359 (2022-03-16 06:08:14+00:00): Hello again! The value of the key operator is the name not the phone number.
EdLoach (2022-12-06 16:28:18+00:00): This changeset includes a number of nodes such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9582085770 with the addr:street as "Colchester Commons Commons" which looking at the map doesn't need Commons repeating.
Mashin (2022-12-06 19:44:31+00:00): Nice catch, thanks!
I fixed the street names.
user_5359 (2022-03-16 06:04:14+00:00): Hello! Please don't copy from other maps (see key website)!
Kovoschiz (2022-03-16 08:59:24+00:00): Please don't remove names. Move them elsewhere. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-16 09:01:07+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-30 05:09:22+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-16 09:02:03+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
AndersAndersson (2024-01-01 10:28:50+00:00): Hej!

Fanns det någon tanke med taggarna på denna simbassäng?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040720359
Aerond (2024-01-01 10:30:51+00:00): Oj, blev fel där. Du får gärna ta bort shop taggen.
AndersAndersson (2024-01-01 12:19:14+00:00): Fixat.
Tack för svar och gott nytt år!
Kovoschiz (2022-03-16 09:03:06+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
tlconrd (2022-03-16 05:38:08+00:00): there hasn't been tourist train either because a couple of tunnels collapsed.
Abu Qrni (2024-05-14 13:18:58+00:00): اسم المحافظة بالانجليزي هكذا 
Al Urdiyat 
أتمنى تعديل ذلك
Akkurator (2023-10-08 23:14:07+00:00): Hallo z1ppo,
der Hofladen ist längst wieder eröffnet, dazu noch ein Café und Ferienwohnungen (das war von vornherein so geplant, daher auch der Umbau, stand sogar in der Zeitung).
Du könntest den gelöschten Node also wieder eintragen.
https://roesslerhof.de/laden/
https://roesslerhof.de/cafe/
https://roesslerhof.de/ferienwohnungen/

Grüße,
Akkurator
cyton (2022-03-17 17:45:34+00:00): moin, ich würd gern wissen, warum du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040340250 
aus "bridge=boardwalk" ein "bridge=yes" gemacht hast
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118537181
Kovoschiz (2022-03-16 09:03:27+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-16 09:04:51+00:00): This removal also causes duplication. 
N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-16 09:05:20+00:00): This deletion also causes duplication. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-16 09:05:55+00:00): This removal causes duplication.

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate.
eggie (2022-03-16 09:44:06+00:00): Dag Sven

name=  alleen gebruiken voor officiele straatnamen en die is niet 	Emergencyroute

access=private dat zal vast niet.
surface= grass_paver is  de tag die je kunt toevoegen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dgrass_paver

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118538122
Eggie
eggie (2022-03-16 09:55:53+00:00): service=emergency_access
highway=service
surface=grass_paver
evt emergency=yes

access=private verwijderen. Er staat geen bord
eggie (2022-03-16 10:49:05+00:00): Het oostelijk deel vanaf de fietsoversteek heb ik aangepast van Gooimeerlaan naar Veluwemeerlaan.  Volgens BGT is dat zo..

Wanneer het niet ,ocht kloppen dan aan het Kadaster/BGT doorgeven
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=94237.1&geometry.y=466219.54&zoomlevel=14.27
eggie (2022-03-16 09:40:51+00:00): access=private is hier fout.. Volgens mij mag iedereen daar komen.
Nu is het geblokkeerd.
Dat kleine stukje zal eerder een highway=path zijn   surface paved  en dan kun je uiteraard emergency=yes taggen indien nodig.
Op het fietspad zie ik de uitzondering niet staan. 
Ik heb de verbinding aangepast naar highway=path en access=private verwijderd. 'k Den dat fietsers er gewoon gebruilk van kunnen maken. 
Staat hier een bord art 461 wvs?
Gr eggie
EneaSuper (2022-03-30 13:10:16+00:00): Ciao, intanto ottimo lavoro, ma mi risulta che il tutto sia stato denominato ieri (quando hanno dato alle stampe la notizia), quindi mi piacerebbe sapere come hai fatto a saperlo 😁

Inoltre, dalla cartografia comunale (https://mappe.comune.genova.it/MapStore2/#/viewer/openlayers/34) mi risulta che siano state denominate anche questo tratto di strada e la relativa rotonda: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27027510
slodki (2022-05-29 11:57:49+00:00): Liczne zaimportowane nieistniejące budynki
eggie (2022-03-16 09:26:48+00:00): Feedback 
Dag Sven..

motor_vehicle=no niet op een paaltje bijtaggen. Dat is default
Net als foot=yes overigens
bicycle=no is hier wel correct als je er niet mag fietsen, want bicycle=yes is weer default.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=bollard
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-16 08:47:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  
Elk begin is moeilijk. 
Tip  Wanneer wegen zijn opengesteld kun je de regel construction=residential verwijderen.
bicycle=yes hoeft niet op fietspaden. Dat is default.
Water niet aan wegen vastmaken.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118539428

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-03-16 09:34:17+00:00): Maar is die doorsteek over dat gras er ook werkelijk en zoals het lag klopt het meer met de luchtfoto.
Kan iedereen dat als doorgang gebruiken. 
De serviceroad parking_aisle eindigt op een rij paaltjes bij de aansluiting bij de school?
Dat zijn barrier=bollard bollard=fixed
Sven Pothuizen (2022-03-16 10:05:29+00:00): Het is een groot parkeerterrein geworden en de groenstrook bij de school is verkleind, doorgang is voor iedereen toegankelijk ook voor vrachtauto's voor de distributie van de winkels.