piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-05-21 05:08:01+00:00): Dag Rudy.. Iets is pas een highway=path als het te smal is voor bv een bosbouwvoertuig/ tractor. Dat zou dus kunnen.
... maar dan 'moet' je de tracktype=grade?  verwijderen.
Dat is de specificatie van een track (geschikt voor een auto/tractor)
tracktype=grade5 is de laagste categorie en nauwelijks zichtbaar.
Dus toch een track?  ..of een path, maar dan tracktype verwijderen.

Bij een path hoort ook een surfacetag 
bv surface=grass  of dirt.. ground  enz. 
Je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85521798

Zie wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype

MVG
Eggie
RudyH1 (2020-05-21 17:54:43+00:00): OK, de uitdaging... een deel van het pad (naar het oosten) is aangegeven met zowel een wagenwiel as wandelpad en deels geplaveid met open betonnen stenen, wel breed genoeg, maar niet echt bedoed voor tractoren. 
Een ander deel is weliswaar breed genoeg voor een tractor, maar aangegeven als wandelpad, is niet verhard en lijkt ook niet echt bedoeld voor tractoren of zo - het is een natuurgebied, geen lanbouwgebied. Hoe noem je beide soorten paden dan? 
Dank voor je geduld  :)
eggie (2020-05-21 18:16:02+00:00): simpel.. als een bosbouwvoertuig er kan rijden is het een highway = track tracktype=grade?
Is het smaller dan is het een highway=path
Het was dacht ik ook eerst als track getagd. ,
maar up to you.. Wanneer je er van overtuigd bent dat het meer een path is heb je mijn zegen :)
Het kan ook van belang zijn voor hulpdiensten. Denk aan brandbestrijdingsvoertuigen. 
VRT IJsselland gebruikt OSM!
Die willen dus weten of ze er door kunnen en passen ook regelmatig van alles aan na survey.
user_5359 (2020-05-21 04:12:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6951529426/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
kucai (2020-05-31 15:04:12+00:00): Why are you changing highway residential to driveway? 
For us in this country, any road that serves more that one house will be classified as residential. If it looks too small to you, then put tag lanes =1 and width too if you have been there.
Chois545 (2020-06-01 19:50:37+00:00): I interpreted this road as service with driveway due to the fact that it dead ends at these homes, making its main purpose to serve these residents. But I can also see your reasoning for residential and support your changes. Thanks!
PT-53 (2020-05-21 07:49:51+00:00): Hallo vestigator83,
in Baden-Württwmberg steht uns die amtliche Karte Maps4BW zur Verfügung, von der wir legal abzeichnen und Adressen übernehmen dürfen. Nicht verwenden dürfen wir Daten aus dem Geoportal BW. Bitte beachte dies.

Maps4BW kann in den Editorn ID und JOSM als Hintergrund eingeblendet werden.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW.
Schau Dir mal Deine Bearbeitungen nochmals mit Maps4BW im Hintergrund an.

Grüße
nevw (2020-05-21 05:10:19+00:00): Hi
I reverted this as unable to confirm the Exhibition hall you have mapped in the park.
joeybab3 (2020-05-21 00:52:07+00:00): ok well, time to figure out how to undo this changeset... good in theory but remember to make sure that you are actually using the most up to date imagery next time you "update" an area @myself
ovruni (2020-05-21 01:35:31+00:00): Hola
Gracia por contribuir con OSM. Desde esta cuenta se han estado ingresando de manera repetitiva edificios dentro de edificios, la etiqueta building[0] está destinada a edificaciones de manera individual, no para marcar lotes, manzanas o perímetros de otras instalaciones grandes, por este motivo algunas ediciones han sido revertidas o retiradas. De la misma manera he podido observar valores dentro de la clave building que no son los que manejamos en OSM y nombres descriptivos [2]. Para otras instalaciones puede encontrar una lista de características en la wiki[1]. Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Map_Features
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
kapazao (2022-04-17 10:28:16+00:00): Hi, if there is a sidewalk, why do you use foot=yes on the road?
People must use the sidewalk and not the road, so I do not think adding the tag foot=yes is correct because some applications make warnings about that.
Regards
AlwynWellington (2022-04-18 01:11:52+00:00): Gidday, several considerations:

I have traversed the section from Yelbes to Merida that is the subject of your reference and cannot see a road that has a sidewalk mapped. I have also followed street level images and cannot see a road with an adjoining sidewalk/footpath or similar.   I have obviously missed something.  Would you kindly direct me to the section of road you are referring to.

The basic rule, recognizing that walking existed long before horses and horseless carriages (motor cars) etc, is that walkers can use roads, unless expressly prohibited by the relevant controlling authority. So, saying that foot=yes is quite standard, whether or not a separate path has been mapped alongside the road. 

In this case a focus for me was mapping the route Camino Mozárabe from Granada to Merida.  And to make sense, the route has to be continuous.

Looking forward to you detail as the precise places where you think I erred two years ago.

Best wishes
kapazao (2022-04-20 13:28:19+00:00): Hi, this is the link about the sidewalk I was talking https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/77731420.

I can understand about using foot=yes on ways where is not redundant and it is needed, but I do not think it is necessary to do it in tracks or in ways were footway=sidewalk is tagged.
In the last case the best think would be adding a footway as a separate way and make the relation going there.

Regards
AlwynWellington (2022-04-20 23:30:00+00:00): Thank you.  I had wondered if that was the part of the way that you had in mind when starting your comment.
First up: the route is not mine but has been created by a wide community.  Here is a link to a very large guide to this route.  
http://www.caminomozarabedesantiago.es/documentos/guia-eng.pdf
At page 82 the map shows the route arriving from the east (to pass through Trujillanos and exit from Calle Juan Carlos I) and pass over the N-V (or N5) in the south west corner.
(The map is not helpful in that north is down, east is on the left and west on the right)
Street level imagery from Calle Juan ... at best shows a shoulder divided from the motor carriageway by a solid painted.  This shoulder cannot be described as a sidewalk, footpath, cycleway or path.  It is part of the road.  This is in keeping with all the roads in Trujillanos itself.  Nothing is marked as a sidewalk etc although it is clear those within the town use those roads as footpaths etc.
Looking at street level images: I cannot see signage prohibiting the use of N-V by those on foot, bicycle or horseback.
Your concerns exists not only at the small section you have highlighted.  Elsewhere along the Camino Mozarabe the route is along roads.  In the vicinity between Yelbes and Terrefresneda the Camino Mozarabde uses the shoulder on the N-430, to name but one.
AlwynWellington (2022-04-20 23:33:02+00:00): In short: the usage I used some two years is appropriate and follows normal guidance for walking on roads that do not have build paths etc.
Best wishes
DP24PH (2020-05-21 12:31:04+00:00): ALERT from DEARPAUL24 Base:
The whole SM City Dasmarinas is hereby mapped as a whole landuse multipolygon relation. Kindly avoid duplicating those features to prevent confusion, as well as to streamline all navigation directions.
user_5359 (2020-05-21 04:06:12+00:00): Hello! For a better description of opening hours please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
ovruni (2020-05-21 01:47:25+00:00): Hola
De la misma forma que en el conjunto de cambios 85522687, en esta se siguen agregando edificios duplicados y otros que se encuentran dentro de otro edificio, por favor coordinar con la comunidad de OSM en Perú si tiene dudas sobre como mapear: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
blackboxlogic (2020-05-27 12:36:54+00:00): Nice golf course! A few curiosities, I hope feedback is welcome. It looks like you've duplicated a road as a cart path (but it's definitely a road), maybe there is a way to say that golf carts go on this road? You've marked all the houses as offices (maybe you did some copy paste?). All the buildings are lumpy, there is a button to 'square' buildings'.

I've fixed much of this in changeset 85833287
Please ask if you have questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85523328
nevw (2020-05-21 05:22:28+00:00): Hi
welcome to the OpenStreetMap.
You have deleted over a 1000 nodes in the Redcliffe Golf Club grounds. 
Has there been extensive change and are you intending to remap the golf course in a more accurate manner.
Please use more informative changeset comments to describe your edits.
nevw (2020-05-21 09:26:12+00:00): I see by your other edits that you do a lot of golf course editing so I guess you have it all under control and I’ll leave it in your safe hands.
Cheers
PlaneMad (2020-05-22 01:15:54+00:00): Was updating Kalapani territory according to the new Nepal map https://assets-cdn.kathmandupost.com/uploads/source/news/2020/news/98353477_1682609495224206_5916763212010749952_o.jpg and noticed that the Kuthi Yankti river was renamed to Kali in this changeset.

While doing some research it seems like there are multiple references that establishes the river is called Kuthi Yankt, especially since the hamlet Kuthi also lies herei:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalapani_territory#Early_19th_century
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/96/1955-US-Army-map-Kali-river-sources.jpg/1280px-1955-US-Army-map-Kali-river-sources.jpg

It would be useful if you can share which part of Treaty of Sugauli claims this is the Kali River?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-18 11:13:42+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3523052 ?
ovruni (2020-05-21 13:42:29+00:00): Hola
En esta edición se borraron instituciones educativas que fueron importados en acuerdo con el Ministerio de educación del Perú[0], como se puede ver en su página de facebook[1] este colegio si existe, más no está ubicado en la posición correcta en el mapa, por lo cual posee la etiqueta fixme=position, por favor no borrar estos colegios, de tal forma que se pierda información sobre el colegio. 
Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos 
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importando_instituciones_educativas_en_Per%C3%BA
[1] https://www.facebook.com/IEPCARITASFELICES2019/
5m4u9 (2020-05-21 22:52:42+00:00): hola, la otra ves te comentaba que en realidad estos lugares que marcas como acantilado no lo son, sino son el lugar donde cambia la pendiente, natural=earth_bank, donde haya lugar que cae roca y es casi vertical, ahí cliff
Warin61 (2020-05-22 09:30:05+00:00): Hi,
There are problems with the relation 11125986

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.56163&lat=-33.55302&zoom=18
sinn156b (2020-05-22 12:43:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for pointing out. to correct.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-05-30 11:33:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85979146 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon edits.  See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8886170 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3719
clay_c (2021-10-26 16:54:18+00:00): Hi ppjj,

This changeset mistakenly promoted various residential and service streets near Downtown Houston to tertiary and secondary, seemingly based on having the same name as a street you demoted elsewhere.

I've reverted some streets that I think should remain at a lower classification in changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113003150

Best,

Clay
Carlos Brys (2020-12-13 12:36:06+00:00): Arreglé las vias de acceso a las estaciones de servicio.
No estan en nivel -1, sino que un tramo va como covered=yes
DUGA (2021-03-12 15:29:51+00:00): May I ask why ref:penndot was added to a traffic light?
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-21 09:55:23+00:00): Hi Cjensen13, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting almost 170 landuse areas, furthermore a completely mapped golf course of a different contributor? Thanks.

Also your changeset comment is somehow misleading here: "update"?

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=85525652

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
DressyPear4 (2020-05-21 16:16:14+00:00): Agora tudo vai virar park?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85525719
gurglypipe (2020-05-21 09:33:58+00:00): Hi, I’ve deleted this track in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85544686 because it’s just a temporary track for a new pipeline being built. I’ve added the full pipeline now, so it should be clear which tracks are temporary near it in future. Cheers.
sidhrk (2020-05-22 05:30:36+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edits based on the driver feedback and available resources. Thanks for sharing the info regarding my edits. Always happy to learn from the community
ortho_is_hot (2020-05-21 06:08:38+00:00): Hi there, the area appears to cover only the building and not any associated land? Therefore I believe building=retail would be more appropriate?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
minus34 (2020-05-26 11:01:56+00:00): thanks for the fix
user_2066394 (2020-05-21 10:26:16+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
ovruni (2020-05-21 13:05:32+00:00): Hola
Gracias por contribuir con OSM. En esta edición se ha estado retirando los valores de la clave "ele" que son de la elevación sobre el nivel del mar, que fueron importados en coordinación de Mapbox y el Ministerio de educación, también se ha estado colocando la clave "building:levels" [0] a áreas de colegios, tanto la clave "building"[1] como la clave "building:levels" se debe de colocar en edificaciones individuales, las cuales son edificios dentro de un colegio grande. En la etiqueta amenity=school [2] puede ver un ejemplo gráfico de como mapear estos colegios. Para otras instalaciones puede encontrar una lista de características en la wiki[3]. Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:building:levels
[1| https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:building
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dschool
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Map_Features

Saludos
olo81 (2020-12-03 23:27:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806674434/history

tagi adresowe dodane do ulicy, błąd
user_2066394 (2020-05-21 10:51:07+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85530002
manojkmohan (2022-01-30 19:23:59+00:00): This admin boundary way seems orphan https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806679075
*Martin* (2020-12-31 21:23:59+00:00): Nejako vela potokov v tomto kraju tecie hore kopcom (a dost ich aj chyba; tu asi ZBGIS import velmi nezavital ;-)). Tych par opacnych, ktorym pridavam name, otocim.
laznik (2021-01-01 05:22:59+00:00): ak si dobre spominam,pri importe potokov ich tieklo dost hore kopcom a snazil som sa smery opravovat. V tomto vyreze som sa sustredoval na Krupinsku a Ostrozky, Sihliansku planinu len okrajovo.
user_5359 (2020-05-22 05:01:18+00:00): Hallo, zwei Fragen zu dem Restaurant:
* Müsste die nicht Rosenhaeusle (oder Rosenhäusle)  statt Rosenheausle benannt sein? 
* Ist die Webseite nicht aktiv (steht noch auf disused:)?
OSM user 1000 (2020-05-23 13:12:12+00:00): ja, es heisst mit ä, ich hab keine deutsche tastatur, tut mir leid und Die webseite scheint falsch zu sein, ich werde mal schauen was die neue ist.
user_5359 (2020-05-23 13:15:20+00:00): Umlautproblem erledigt :)
s8evq (2020-06-02 09:07:00+00:00): Dag dvdhoven,
Zou het kunnen dat je per ongeluk access=no doorgetrokken hebt op https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806687182
Als we https://osmcha.org/changesets/60005560/ bekijken lijkt het niet de bedoeling van AndriesP om dat stukje op access=no te zetten. Ik heb het alvast aangepast. Indien het toch echt access=no is, laat dan iets weten. Dan kunnen we dit terugzetten of desnoods even ter plaatse kijken.
dvdhoven (2020-06-02 11:53:19+00:00): Er is hier door een mapper van alles doorverbonden, waardoor een route in de problemen is gekomen. Ik heb wegen weer doorgeknipt. Niks doorgetrokken, dat heeft de schademaker veroorzaakt met doorverbinden.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Vinber (2020-05-21 09:06:37+00:00): # avec snt

Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).


Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Oceane Muller (2020-05-21 09:14:26+00:00): Merci beaucoup !

En effet je débute et je tente de compléter les cartes des lieux qui sont autour de moi. 

J'espère ne pas faire d'erreurs.
FajrAl (2023-09-21 03:38:08+00:00): what are these???
Heinz_V (2021-07-16 05:02:24+00:00): You mapped here a boundary with a geojson file. Please explain the data source.
hsc666 (2020-05-21 15:04:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85561893 where the changeset comment is: Revert wegen fiktiver Botschaft + Adressduplikat
user_2066394 (2020-05-21 10:55:08+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85537420
Jordi MF (2020-05-21 14:45:19+00:00): Hola,

Gracias por añadir Danimobel a la base de datos de OpenStreetMap. Sin embargo, estaba etiquetada como un supermercado. Lo he modificado a "tienda de muebles", pero viendo la página web, entiendo que Danimobel es un fabricante de mesas y sillas (muebles). Por tanto, la etiqueta "tienda de muebles" tampoco sería correcta a no ser que una persona puede entrar en este lugar a comprar. Mi pregunta es, ¿este nodo es una oficina del fabricante o es una tienda?
Así mejoraremos la información en OSM.
Saludos,
Jordi
eggie (2020-05-21 08:26:18+00:00): Dag 3-14
Bij bridge=yes hoort nog layer=1
bicycle=designated hoort niet op een fietspad. Het is immers al een fietspad.
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-05-21 08:42:40+00:00): Vermoedelijk zijn het G13 fietspaden ..
Dan 
highway=cycleway
moped=no
mofa=no
traffic_sign=NL:G13

Up to you
abakus_uploader (2020-05-21 22:31:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
andrewwiseman (2020-08-07 22:09:45+00:00): Thanks for mapping! Make sure to only add the name if you know the name of that feature. It looks like you added the hashtags to the Name field. The hashtags are what you add when you save your edits.
user_2066394 (2020-05-21 10:57:17+00:00): statt löschen besser mit removed: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:removed:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85539688
m@rio (2020-05-30 07:38:22+00:00): Cześć,
w Twoim zestawie zmian (85539874) zostały naniesione zdublowane dane adresowe dla 17 punktów w Lusówku. 
Poniżej dwa przykłady: https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Lus%C3%B3wko%20%C5%BBeglarska%2018#map=19/52.43709/16.64022
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Lus%C3%B3wko%20Wydmowa%208#map=19/52.44111/16.63788.

Prośba o wycofanie lub usunięcie zdublowanych informacji.
pozdrawiam, m@rio.
m_p_13 (2020-05-30 20:16:58+00:00): Poprawiłem
Mam nadzieję, że wszystko
m@rio (2020-05-30 21:28:15+00:00): Tak, z tym że nie do końca o to chodziło - pozostawiłeś swoje dane, a usunąłeś wcześniejsze, które były bardziej kompletne - zawierały addr:city:simc, addr:street:sym_ul i source:addr.
LeTopographeFou (2020-05-23 08:04:40+00:00): Bonjour Vincent, le magasin Picard était déjà présent, ajouté par mes soins et je pense bien cartographié (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687450405). Peux-tu stp corriger le doublon ?
vincent_95 (2020-05-24 16:31:13+00:00): Oops merci. Je regarde ça dès que j'ai un JOSM sous la main
vincent_95 (2020-05-25 17:33:35+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai finalement pu regarder.

Contrairement à ce que tu dis, le magasin Picard n'a pas été ajouté par tes soins en 2019. Je l'ai ajouté en 2014, il a été édité au fil du temps, puis supprimé/remplacé par tes soins en 2019. Tu es passé d'un schéma de tags largement répandu qui consiste à tagguer un bâtiment (building=*) avec le shop=* du magasin qui l'occupe à un schéma où le shop n'est associé à aucun élément physique, ni building ni landuse. C'est très très discutable. Quand je dis "largement répandu" : Taginfo mentionne 945000 shops sur des ways, et par ailleurs 870000 combinaisons shop & building, dont on peut logiquement penser que l'écrasante majorité concerne des ways et non des nodes, vu que 99% des tags building sont associés à des ways.

En l'espèce le parking reste traversable par des piétons y compris quand le magasin est fermé, donc faire de l'emprise globale celle du magasin, en y associant des horaires d'ouverture fermeture, est aussi largement discutable. Incidemment, si j'ai rétabli les infos sur le polygone du bâtiment, ça n'est pas par réaction à ton schéma, c'est tout simplement parce que je ne l'ai pas vu, alors que j'avais le nez dessus. Ca pose aussi des questions sur le bien fondé de ton schéma en l'état actuel des outils d'édition.

En résumé  : ta conversion de schéma n'ajoute à mon sens pas de valeur sur cet exemple. Il y a bien un doublon à l'instant, mais je trouverais profitable qu'on garde une schématisation plus conventionnelle et intuitive pour le cartographe lambda que celle que tu as apportée. 

Dispo bien sur pour en discuter et arriver à un consensus.
merci, et désolé pour le message un peu long,
vincent