piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
seerola (2022-10-17 18:28:46+00:00): Moro, Eka kerta kun saan palautetta muutoksista, kiitos! Hyvä että otetaan kantaa. Vaikka ohjeita on niin käyttö on todella kirjavaa tälläkin alueella. Yleisesti ottaen tuota "service" tyyppiä käytetään todella paljon väärin ihan e.g. läpikulku metsäteillä ja siitä olen tullut hieman allergiseksi koko tyypille. En myöskään näe järkevänä että kartan tekijä alkaa päättämään tarkkaa kohtaa, josta pidemmälle ei saisi mennä. Se tulkinta täytyy jättää jokaiselle kulkijalle olettaen että jokamiehen oikeuksia (ja velvollisuuksia) noudatetaan. Pyöräilyn salliminen 'service' tuo sen esimerkiksi wandrerissa samankaltaiseksi kuin naapurissa olevat residental tie. Selkeintä olisi jos kaikki pihatiet olisi merkitty yhtenäisesti ilman erityistä pyöräilyn sallimista, mutta tämänkin alueen kartat on niin kirjavia. Toki aina jos tekee muutoksen tai uutta, niin kai pitäisi pyrkiä oikeellisuuteen eikä samankaltaisuuteen.
Tuo "unclassified"-merkintä on kyllä väärä tuossa mainitsemassasi kohdassa, korjaankin sen heti. 
Kaikki merkintäni pohjautuvat paikalla käyntiin, esim. Pirkkalan alueella on paljon MML (vanhoissa) maastokartoissa olevia polkuja siirretty OSMiin vaikka maastossa ei ole enää mitään nähtävissä.
ssundell (2022-10-17 18:42:14+00:00): Joo, olen samaa mieltä, että varsinkin noilla metsäteillä service on käytännössä poikkeuksetta väärin, ja olen vähän yrittänyt antaa siitäkin palautetta...

Ja olen itse asiassa samaa mieltä tuosta tulkinnastakin, tuo talon kiertävä service-tie vain särähti pahasti silmään, kun se näyttäisi olevan niin selkeästi pihalla 8)

Toinen esimerkki tulkintaa vaativasta tilanteestahan ovat esim. erinäiset peltotiet, joille ei välttämättä pääse muuten kuin pihan läpi. Olen nähnyt niissä joskus private-merkintöjä, mutta en ole oikein siitäkään ihastunut, kun se koko tie ei kuitenkaan sinällään ole yksityinen - voihan sinne päätyä kuitenkin vaikka merkitsemätöntä polkua tai hankikantoa pitkin.
highflyer74 (2022-10-13 13:18:22+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Ein paar Tipps zu Deinen Edits:

Vermutlich weißt du es nicht, deshalb der Hinweis: straßenbegleitende Fuß- und Radwege werden meist nicht als separater Weg eingezeichnet (es sei denn, sie sind baulich von der Straße getrennt, z.B. durch Leitplanken, einen breiteren Grünstreifen etc., was eine Überquerung der Straße verhindern würde).

In diesem Fall sind die Daten bereits an der Straße erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201107518. Hierfür werden andere Tags verwendet, als für separat gemappte Wege.

Wichtig auch: der von dir hinzugefügte Weg schneidet Gebäude. Das sollte nicht sein, da es ja in der Realität laut Luftbild auch nicht der Fall ist.

Dann befinden sich noch diverse Tags an dem Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102431992), welche nicht notwendig sind. Tatsächlich sind das alle, außer highway=path ;-).

Auch mappen wir Wege / Übergänge etc. nicht nach subjektiven Kriterien (Einschätzung von Gefährlichkeit / Empfehlungen etc). Wir nehmen als Basis ausschließlich die Schilder- und Wegesituation vor Ort. Deshalb bitte kein =no setzen, wenn dies nicht vor Ort so ausgeschildert ist.

Das klingt für dich evtl. ziemlich deprimierend, aber mach dir nichts draus! Wir waren alle mal neu bei OSM.

Ein bisschen Lesestoff für dich:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Da OSM ein Community Projekt ist, kann ich dir sehr empfehlen, den Kontakt zu anderen Mappern zu suchen. Dadurch lernt man immer dazu und trägt dazu bei, dass die Daten immer besser werden.

Wir haben in Bremen ein monatliches Mappertreffen, zu dem du herzlich willkommen bist (aktuell online und vor Ort): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Community

Und: in Verden findet am 20.10. um 18 Uhr im Rathaus ein initiales Treffen von Mappern aus der Region statt. Ich werde ich auch dort sein und falls du daran Interesse hast, sag' mir gern Bescheid.

Viele Grüße!
map per (2022-10-24 19:43:18+00:00): Bezüglich review_requested:

Sieht alles gut aus, danke fürs Einzeichnen
Frans S (2022-10-15 14:37:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127268327
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-05-13 19:41:25+00:00): não é track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830608690/history
GPar (2022-10-10 07:01:40+00:00): This traffic light doesnt exist
jtracey (2022-10-11 18:41:26+00:00): Hi! Islands this small should actually be tagged as islets, not islands:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=islet
(I don't use Go Map, but most editors will have a tool to measure something's area; an island becomes an islet at less than around 1 square km/1 million sq m/11 million sq ft).

Also, because this is inside a water area, it has to be taken out of that area's shape, using the multipolygon relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/222351
If you're not familiar with multipolygons, they can sound a bit tricky at first, but are pretty simple once you get the hang of them; they're basically just a list of everything that makes the outside of the shape ("outer" members), and everything that makes the inside of the shape ("inner" members):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Both of these are easy to detect and fix (I already fixed it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127375148), so it's not a big deal, just thought I'd let you know. :)
carter_oswald (2022-10-11 18:46:46+00:00): Thanks for fixing my mistake will learn from the material you gave me so I know how to do it
Frans S (2022-10-13 12:51:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Buildings: Each rectangular building need to be squared with the Q key and tagged as building=yes.
Highways, use the correct tagging. 
Do not connect nodes to other features. These are errors.
Landuse:  No need to add descriptions
Map buildings rather than area=yes and text 'open sand field.'
To give you an idea, what a validator see when he opens this task to validate.
12 warnings like crossing areas /buildings
16 overlapping areas
> 100 buildings not squared.
So, a request to map more accurate.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127268882
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
eggie (2023-02-24 14:41:08+00:00): Beste Freek...

Wordt hier aan een brug gebouwd of is het alleen een plan?

Wanneer het nog niet is aanbesteed wellicht beter verwijderen. Is het plan concreet dan highway=proposed (en geen construction)
met proposed=cycleway.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-02-24 14:46:06+00:00): Ahh  het krijgt vorm zie ik nu
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=24-02-2022&loc=52.38511%2C4.910953%2C19z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-12-01&acqid=20221201_105512_SV2-01%2C20221201_105514_SV2-01&sensor=SuperView-1

Groet
eggie
oba510 (2022-10-10 04:15:50+00:00): Were the sharrows removed from San Pablo Ave recently? 

ie: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=792229924757717
tbo47 (2022-10-11 16:37:58+00:00): Yep, you are correct. My bad.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127370204
bikingaround244 (2023-03-17 03:11:09+00:00): I visited a friend while back here and there where no real clear paths here.  I would say this is kind of a stretch to be mapping this.
Biking Dude (2023-03-17 17:56:47+00:00): You're talking about the path through the park, right? I put it in as an informal path - I thought it was good to show that you can get from Strawberry Knoll Road to Quail Valley Boulevard without having to go all the way around.
Leo Slager (2022-10-10 21:39:11+00:00): Helaas is dit een grote wirwar van self-intersecting ways geworden.
Ik zie geen kans om dat te ontwarren.
Wellicht is het slimmer om deze changeset te reverten en opnieuw te beginnen, maar dan niet met zo een ongeschikte editor als Go Map.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.03875&lat=52.13323&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.90&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
JJJWegdam (2022-10-11 10:05:10+00:00): Dat is gewoon een kwestie van de editor Go Map die als voordeel heeft dat je op je mobiel snel even kan editen, maar als nadeel heeft dat je geen relations kan maken. Als je het heel storend vind kan ik het op m’n PC wel even fixen in JOSM
JJJWegdam (2022-10-11 10:09:07+00:00): Gefixt in 127269614
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-09 22:08:22+00:00): Witaj!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Zobacz tutaj jak opisywać zmiany bo "Zmiana lokalna" nie mówi za bardzo co zostało zmienione
abakus_uploader (2022-10-10 22:31:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-10-09 22:31:19+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2022-10-13 13:06:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127270322
ivanbranco (2024-08-28 07:26:01+00:00): Hi Kautilya3,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1466776091/history

what is this place? place=point is not a documented value. 

The highway=track are interrupted just before that point, if it's a crossing they should be connected I guess?
Ser9ei (2023-06-04 16:46:42+00:00): Это плохое 3D https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=59.9407845&lon=30.3282110&zoom=19&camera.theta=60.233&camera.phi=6.303
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127270647
TrickyFoxy (2023-06-04 17:11:00+00:00): к сожалению да. Можете смело перерисовывать
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127270647
BCNorwich (2022-10-10 06:29:38+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The tourist attraction is mapped as an area here Way: Leicester Square (4082589). Thus your 4 POI are duplications that I've removed.

Regards Bernard.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-17 22:42:13+00:00): Czy zdjęcie bicycle=yes z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83334239/history i pozostawienie go na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102454887 było celowe?
YomanNH (2022-10-18 06:33:00+00:00): Tak, przy wjeździe od strony ul. Hynka stoi znak zakazu ruchu z drobnymi wyłączeniami, dlatego usunąłem bicycle=yes z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83334239. Natomiast na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102454887 dałem bicycle=yes, ponieważ powyższy zakaz można ominąć jadąc przez https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184611588 i następnie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097682462. Zastanawiałem się tylko, czy na tym pierwszym odcinku nie dodać czegoś w stylu bicycle:backward=yes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-18 11:40:35+00:00): Jak https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097682462 można jechać to można skręcić z tego w obie strony...

Więc dałbym tam może oneway:bicycle=yes ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-18 11:43:03+00:00): Dałem.

Ogólnie, dotarłeś gdzieś do informacji o legalności jazdy rowerem po chodnikach osiedlowych? Kiedyś szukałem i nie dotarłem do niczego co by mi pewność dawało (nie ma zakazu z kodeksu drogowego, ale może jest z czegoś innego?)
YomanNH (2022-10-18 12:47:04+00:00): Trafiłem kiedyś na artykuł w którym była informacja, że kodeks drogowy na chodnikach niebiegnących wzdłuż jezdni nie obowiązuje, więc jazda rowerem jest tam legalna, o ile ustępuje się pierwszeństwa pieszym. Nie trafiłem na żaden przepis zakazujący jazdy w takich miejscach (o ile oczywiście nie ma znaku zakazu lub C-16).
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-18 14:36:44+00:00): a to nie podpada pod jakieś przepisy wynikające z prawa własności?

Np. kodeks drogowy na chodnikach niebiegnących wzdłuż jezdni nie obowiązuje ale to chyba nie znaczy że mogę tam wjechać motocyklem.
YomanNH (2022-10-18 21:35:50+00:00): Nic mi nie wiadomo o przepisach wynikających z prawa własności.

Spotkałem się nawet z teorią, że skoro chodnik nie jest przy drodze, to nie jest chodnikiem i można tam nawet wjechać samochodem... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118172648
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 22:59:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 121199049.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 22:59:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 124778637.
snoozingnewt (2022-10-12 20:31:24+00:00): Wait, are all five of those water bodies called Python Lake? If so, you should put them into a relation
Viajero Perdido (2022-10-12 22:02:56+00:00): If I can elaborate...  Create a relation, containing all 5 ponds as outer members.  Tags (name etc.) go on relation only, not on member ways (remove those), so tags are recorded only once, and rendered only once.  

Add the two islets as inner members, and they'll un-disappear.  And I'd double-check spelling of that islet.  Cheers.
Viajero Perdido (2022-10-12 23:12:41+00:00): Forgot to mention: the relation also needs type=multipolygon.  Example:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6723248
Stefan@MUC (2023-02-12 16:25:21+00:00): Du hast leider nicht nur das Café Ludwig, sondern auch noch vier andere Objekte bearbeitet, da du zwei Objekte (Kunstwerk Go! und einen Baum) verschoben hast. Habe das mit Changeset 132453034 schon wieder repariert. Bitte vorsichtig sein :)
KaosKatte (2023-02-21 21:46:44+00:00): Oh Mann - Danke Dir!
Ich lass da in Zukunft die Finger von. Außer Eigenschaften von Läden bearbeiten könnte ich eh nichts beitragen.
Die Bedienung ist mir zu kompliziert, obwohl ich sonst eigentlich keine Probleme mit kniffeligen Anwendungen habe.
Ein paar andere eigene Fehler konnte ich rechtzeitig vereiteln - hier habe ich es nicht einmal gemerkt. Gut, dass Du aufgepasst hast.
Schön' Gruß!
Karsten
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 122941147, 122941224, 122941413, 122941443, 122941551, 122943052, 122943093, 122943133, 122943363, 122943398, 122943460, 122943478, 122943511, 122943545, 122943553, 122944168, 122944190, 122944229, 122944257, 122944293, 122944329, 122944354, 122944451, 122944473, 122944509, 122946699, 122946756, 123044116, 123044166, 123044186, 123044204, 123044227, 123044249, 123044302.
AmanBD (2022-10-25 11:47:50+00:00): Dear @Aaco, You have changed a National Highway  into a tertiary road. Please undo this.
A National Highway should be tagged as highway=trunk. For more details, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Tagging_Standard_for_Bangladesh

The road segment edited by you is part of N511 National Highway. For more details, see: https://www.rhd.gov.bd/RHDMaps_new/Maps/Roads/2.jpg
Aaco (2022-10-29 11:19:02+00:00): I have changed the N511 into trunk.
Thanks,
Frans S (2022-10-10 13:24:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
detached buildings and connected buildings:
Due to the fine imagery, you can see that the connected houses has to be tagged as individual buildings. See the garden borders.
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 100 out of 200 mapped buildings are not accurate squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127272734
Frans S (2022-10-10 13:17:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127272750
Frans S (2022-10-10 13:06:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project as a new mapper. Welcome.
I review mapped tasks at random. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key.  You did not square a single building.
Highways
Please tag the highways in according to the ranking of highways. See this wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
You tagged a local highway, unclassified at best,  as a tertiary highway ( connects villages and towns).
In rural areas, like here, the tag residential is not to be used. Unclassified, or as access to a building, services.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127272791
Frans S (2022-10-10 12:53:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most highways and mapped them
When I measure the width of a number of these paths, as you tagged them, I should go for unclassified, as some are wider than 1,8 - 2mtr and thus accessible for cars.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127272808
Wilmer Osario (2022-10-12 19:40:34+00:00): I have made a new better drawing, adapted the polygon to truly urbanized areas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14688980
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-13 08:38:18+00:00): Thank you for your effort and sorry for my rude remark earlier. This looks like an improvement, but does it have to be one giant multipolygon?
Wilmer Osario (2022-10-14 00:22:37+00:00): I draw it like this to cover that large number of buildings and houses scattered around the west of Maracaibo, that from my experience as a mapper, I consider them part of the urban environment. Although I try not to cover the farms and other agricultural buildings.
user_5359 (2022-10-17 06:02:32+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/319963318. what is the meaning of the tag
nodo = -139164 platform # 2 de Abril.
guillemmal (2022-10-17 10:58:24+00:00): Hi! Sorry! It's fixed now, thanks for pointing out the bug.
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:44:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
This is a building and road only project.
Mapping land-use is not requested. 
However, you mapped landuse without tagging it.
It is not necessary to add tag surface=unpaved to a highway=track. A track is by default unpaved.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127273032