piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Buraddo (2021-04-16 14:04:14+00:00): Changeset reverted in #103064942.
River tags on administrative boundary.
ParqueRodo (2021-04-16 23:30:10+00:00): Hi muchichka_s and Buraddo, thank you for notifying me and providing further details and fixes! I have reviewed the changes that were made and reversions on this river and will makes sure to avoid these kinds of changes going forward. Again, I appreciate your quick investigation here and providing further details for me.
669 (2021-05-07 08:31:32+00:00): 实际利丰社区、潮韵社区有出入
AUV (2021-05-07 08:43:05+00:00): 来源：《杭州市萧山区人民政府关于同意建立盈丰街道潮韵社区、奔竞社区及利丰社区的批复》
确认无误
5m4u9 (2021-04-16 23:29:28+00:00): hola, gracias por las ediciones. Hay algunas cosas que corregiste que lo cambiaste como edificio.

Al seleccionar una categoria deberías fijarte en no seleccionar los edificios sino los terrenos...

por ejemplo eliges "escuela", pero te salen dos opciones, debes seleccionar en la mayoría de las veces "terreno de escuela"
5m4u9 (2021-04-16 23:40:46+00:00): ya corregí los que estaban con error,
Buraddo (2021-04-16 14:02:56+00:00): Reverted in #103064909
River tags on admin boudnary
Buraddo (2021-04-16 14:01:49+00:00): Reverted in #103064838
Bad names in other languages
Buraddo (2021-04-16 13:11:25+00:00): Seriously? What is this change:
relation name:
before=Дністер / Nistru	
after=R30 – Tudora – Palanca – frontiera cu Ucraina

This is a river, not a road.
Santurce (2021-04-16 23:19:16+00:00): Hi Buraddo, thank you for alerting me to this! I have restored this relation back to the original name. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103083813
Buraddo (2021-04-16 14:00:40+00:00): Reverted in #103064796.
River tags on admin boundary
Palolo (2021-04-16 14:24:54+00:00): Thank you for your interest in helping map Tanzania. Please look over the instructions on how to map buildings. Use the q key to make square corners. Speeding through an area only makes more work for others.
cserpell (2021-04-16 13:37:57+00:00): Hi rocky2109, thanks for all the help in Chile. Please remember that according to current laws in Chile, maximum speed in urban areas is always 50 km/h, except in very few exceptional cases that are part of the law. This applies even when outdated street signs mark bigger speeds.
Buraddo (2021-04-16 13:59:27+00:00): Reverted in #103064726.
River tags on administrative boundary
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
ravali_78 (2021-04-19 04:45:55+00:00): Hi Erniesun,
i have fixed road classification as per OSM wiki, teritiary shouldn't be deadend. Kindly check with 
way 931279214,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103163954.
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103034098
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:30:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Buraddo (2021-04-16 13:58:31+00:00): Reverted in #103064669.
River tags on boundary, bad names.
andrewwiseman (2021-05-11 20:49:32+00:00): hi, have you been to this location? do you know the names of these buildings? if not please don't add them
Cascafico (2021-04-16 08:38:04+00:00): Benvenut* in OSM. Grazie per l'inserimento, ma Il numero del sentiero andrebbe solo sulla relazione.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/140673
C'è consenso nel seguire questo metodo per mantenere ordine.
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-04-24 09:09:50+00:00): Hello ortegajovan41. You're adding a lot of shops and amenities. Did you visit all of them yourself or are you using information from another map or database?
gileri (2021-04-16 08:02:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Pouvez-vous corriger votre outil d'intégration pour qu'il ne puisse pas mettre de valeurs vides sur les objets ?

Merci
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2021-04-16 08:13:06+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre message.
C'est effectivement corrigé

Cordialement,
gileri (2021-04-16 08:40:39+00:00): Dans votre outil pour que ça bloque l'import, ou manuellement ?

Il me semble que c'est déjà arrivé ça.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2021-04-16 09:42:16+00:00): C'est un import automatique qu'on ne peut pas adapter autrement.
Pour le moment, on ne peut que corriger manuellement.

Cordialement,
gileri (2021-04-16 09:49:49+00:00): C'est vrai que c'est plus simple de se reposer sur le travail de bénévoles plutôt que d'ajouter un test basique de validation de données.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-04-16 10:42:28+00:00): > C'est un import automatique qu'on ne peut pas adapter autrement

Accordons le bénéfice du doute: disons il s'agit d'incompétence plutôt que de pur foutage de gueule. Dites à votre fournisseur d'outils que l'adaptation est possible, demandez-lui un devis et si vous avez un doute demandez-nous conseil !
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2021-04-16 12:17:16+00:00): Bonjour, 
merci pour vos alertes, 
les demandes de corrections ont été faites auprès de notre fournisseur d'outils.
Cordialement
Alain
gileri (2021-04-17 08:33:56+00:00): J'ai corrigé le reste des valeurs incorrectes contact:housenumber mises par DigitalBricks :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103082576
Dino Michelini (2021-04-18 08:44:21+00:00): Ciao, in accordo con quanto previsto nella wiki di OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) sarebbe opportuno lascire un commento esplicativo delle modifiche fatte. Grazie
alexashh (2021-04-16 13:10:14+00:00): Добрый день, добро пожаловать на OSM! К сожалению, это неакккуратная правка - вы, видимо, случайно подвинули точку https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1825894042 и создали пересечение в дорожной сети.

Также на карте уже есть amenity=university соответсвующий Минискому университету - он, как принято в OSM проставлен не точкой на здании, и не на самом здании, а на территории всего кампуса https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2281042
jpennycook (2021-04-16 09:49:38+00:00): Hi!

Are you sure this (Cove Road) is a dual carriageway - i.e. "a road with a dividing strip or barrier between the traffic in opposite directions" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:dual_carriageway%3Dyes)?  From memory, this is just a single carriageway road, with a restriction preventing motor vehicles from joining Elsmleigh Road from Cove Road (although bicycles are allowed), and another preventing all right turns from Elmsleigh Road onto Cove Road.
Were the shops on Cove Road demolished to build this dual carriageway?
If it's not a dual carriageway, you might want to look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Jon
DaveF (2021-04-16 10:43:14+00:00): https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.2921565,-0.7679334,3a,75y,69.29h,84.56t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saI94eXIpFxSv_2oLr4a2ZQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
Carldobs (2021-04-16 10:54:26+00:00): From Elmsleigh Road it is turn left only. But the mapping is seeing it as a two way direction from junction.
I have removed the dual carriage way as this was an incorrect process for correction
jpennycook (2021-04-16 11:09:03+00:00): Thanks.  It would be easiest to revert the changeset, so I'll do that, then add the turn restriction.
jpennycook (2021-04-16 11:11:47+00:00): Okay, it seems that I cannot revert because of the subsequent changes.  I'll need to make further corrections.
abakus_uploader (2021-04-16 22:32:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
coolmule0 (2021-04-16 07:42:41+00:00): part of #ukqp
trigpoint (2021-04-16 11:36:48+00:00): What does #ukqp mean?
trigpoint (2021-04-16 11:37:35+00:00): Sorry, got it UK Quarterly Project
Glassman (2021-04-17 00:01:52+00:00): #TIP: When removing a business, it's best just to remove the tags with the business name but leave the address. Hopefully a new business will move in. Can you update your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103039192
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-19 07:06:59+00:00): Bonjour, 
Une petite description du point de vue ? 
#CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103039286
OT Aire Eugénie (2021-04-19 12:49:20+00:00): C'est noté, merci !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103039286
Russ McD (2022-11-08 02:34:28+00:00): pra_veen
Are you an idiot ?  I surveyed this on the ground and correctly added it as a primary link .  Its a U-turn, and that how we map in Thailand and the rest of the world.
You have come along and changed it to a service road to match the tiny little bits of data you want to add for Grab ti justify your salary.
Its WRONG and your efforts are destroying the accuracy of our data in Thailand.  
I see you have left the Grab team now, and left the Thai mappers to fix all your crap !
eggie (2021-04-16 08:06:44+00:00): Dag Mr Ed..

De oude adresnodes kunnen dan ook weg.
Een BAG update kun je aanvragen via het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG update
Doe je dat zelf?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog identiek aan osm account

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 08:52:43+00:00): BAG update aanvraag loopt
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=826562#p826562
ottwiz (2021-04-16 08:01:15+00:00): Yeah, the size of the changeset is a little bit big, because i put some forests to the edge of Elk River
eggie (2021-04-16 08:11:51+00:00): Dag Mr Ed.. Gebouwen zelf krijgen geen adresgegevens. Die zijn er al middels de adresnodes.
Ze komen mee met de import. Vraag via het forum een nieuw import. 
Draadje verzoek BAG import
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 08:17:00+00:00): Wanneer die nummers niet kloppen svp doorgeven aan het Kadaster.. Het zal anders steeds weer opnieuw verkeerd worden ingevoerd bij periodieke updates.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Diependaalselaan%20337&resultOffset=0&objectId=0402100001626664&geometry.x=138990.78699743&geometry.y=469516.56000042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=

.. en niet naar de dakranden kijken .. Dat zet je op het verkeerde been.
eggie (2021-04-16 08:21:13+00:00): Mr Ed.. Je pand heb je vastgeplakt aan de landuse residential
Beter geen gebouwen van vorm veranderen. Het dak is niet waar het gebouw staat. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt doorgeven aan het kadaster. Svp geen adressen toevoegen in OSM aan de gebouwomtrek. De naam kan uiteraard wel asl het de gebouwnaam is.. anders de adresnode gebruiken.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 08:23:49+00:00): BAG data hersteld.. (building_shape)
eggie (2021-04-16 08:26:28+00:00): Ik zal je het welkomstbericht toesturen per PB met nuttige tips. Doe er je voordeel mee. 
MVG
eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-16 08:47:09+00:00): Hi DRG

If it's not official  it's certainly not a track.. use highway=path

Why a ref=wtp-1260  ?  at the start?
If you are a Dutch mapper let me know In that case I 'll send you our welcomemail in Dutch with usefull hints. 
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 09:03:02+00:00): De noderef is from an other mapper 
It's okay.
I changed track into path and disconnect the bench from the path.

Greetz,
eggie
DRG_dev (2021-04-18 09:45:00+00:00): @eggie,

Jup, i am a Dutch mapper, a complete novice that is.

Regards,
DRG
eggie (2021-04-18 09:56:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
kapazao (2024-05-29 18:28:06+00:00): https://www.diariocordoba.com/cordoba/2016/07/31/bembezar-secas-36819319.html
A pesar de que el ayuntamiento votase retirar "del Caudillo" en INE o IGN sigue apareciendo como tal. ¿Se llegó a aprobar?
Johnbo (2024-05-30 11:21:49+00:00): Pues lo cierto es que no lo sé. Por la noticia lo daba por hecho. Si reparé en cambiarlo es porque pasé por la carretera de Hornachuelos y vi que los carteles anunciaban "Poblado de Bembézar" y no "del Caudillo". 

Mirando imágenes a pie de calle, en la entrada pone "Bienvenidos a Bembézar", mientras que en 2008 la cartelería llevaba el nombre antiguo.
JessAk71 (2021-04-25 22:05:56+00:00): Hello, please be careful with what buildings you are merging node tags with because in some cases you are removing correct tags from the original buildings. In this changeset you transfer the hotel poi tags to a tower of this building and you removed the actual name of the tower which was "Tower 2", where as the hotel itself is actually the larger building here underneath and already has the correct hotel tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31557331 . If you are unsure as to what to do with the node tags Id suggest to leave it as they were. I have already gone and corrected this building.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-27 05:16:32+00:00): Sorry for the inconvenience, it was my mistake, won't be repeating it.
gscholz (2021-05-06 04:37:03+00:00): Hi islami_m,
your recent edits have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-47.18689&lat=-23.10190&zoom=12&overlays=snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As youn probably know these can not be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?

Please have also a look at the warings in this changeset which your editor showed as you uploaded this changeset.

Kind Regards
Guido
eggie (2021-04-16 08:54:57+00:00): Dag Irene.. beter nooit access=no gebruiken. 
Dat is een gebiedsverbod voor iedereen. Dat zal hier toch niet?
Haal je dat weer weg?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 08:56:18+00:00): Haal svp access=no weg. Dat is het bord Verboden toegang.
De rendering zal ook een stuk minder worden, want deze weg doet er niet meer toe.
Eggie
Vinber (2021-04-16 16:34:14+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne suis pas sur de bien comprendre ce que vous avez ajouté.
Un aéroport ?
Bonne journée
eggie (2021-04-16 09:18:32+00:00): Staat hier een bord met Verboden Toegang Zoniet haal svp access=no weg
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 09:19:21+00:00): Ook bicycle=no hoeft niet op een wandelpad. dat is default
Irene van der Zwan (2021-04-16 09:26:33+00:00): Bij elke strandafgang in de gemeente Zandvoort staat een bord met 'verboden voor motervoertuigen' en 'verboden voor (brom)fietsers' en ook verboden voor ruiters, zie ik nu net op de foto. Vandaar acces=no.
mvg
Irene
eggie (2021-04-16 09:36:28+00:00): Oke, maar dat is niet access=no
Op een wandelpad  G7 bord zullen motorvoertuigen en tweewielers niet routeren.
Wanneer het  bv een highway=service betreft dat tag je 
vehicle=no  Alle vliegen in één klap.. of je benoemd alle categorieën apart
bicycle=no moped=no horse=no
Maar niet access=no  Dat is algemeen.
We is het hier denk ik van belang om emergency=yes te taggen.
Bij access=no zal het pad ook nog nauwelijks zichtbaar zijn.
Voorzover ik het nog niet hebt aangepast graag access=no verwijderen.
Mapse
eggie
Cristoffs (2021-04-17 10:32:26+00:00): Cześć! Proszę trochę uważniej mapuj. Dodałeś nazwę ulicy na pkt. należącym do granicy miejscowości, a nie do ulicy. Drogę polną narysowałeś w miejscu gdzie ona nie przebiega według orto, różnica jest około 5-10 metrów ale jednak. Jeśli biegasz może powinieneś dodawać na podstawie  śladów. Co ty na to?
Cristoffs (2021-04-17 10:34:37+00:00): ps. poprawiłem
marchelmza (2021-04-17 16:00:20+00:00): Spoko sorki byłem tu pierwszy raz a wczoraj wrzuciłem pełny ślad GPS
eggie (2021-04-16 09:14:25+00:00): Volgens jou mag hier niemand komen, want je zet de boel op slot met acccess=no
Maak geen combinaties met access=no. want het is bijna altijd fout
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 09:14:51+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103046104
trigpoint (2022-02-24 11:54:00+00:00): Ignore it? 
I had never even noticed it :)
ohmanger (2022-02-24 13:22:54+00:00): Ha yes, I only clocked it after they trimmed the bushes back.

Legally this toll is supposed to apply to cycles/motorcycle traffic, which I'm guessing is why the main barriers don't extend the whole way across.
eggie (2021-04-16 09:21:01+00:00): access no verwijderd...  Dat kan onmogelijk
Warin61 (2021-04-17 07:15:15+00:00): The relation 'Clybucca Creek' has part of the Maclay Rv, Anderson Inlet, Spencers Ck, Maclay Arm ... so I have deleted the name from the relation. 

The DCS Base Map is better detailed than the topo map.
johnf57 (2021-04-18 10:47:58+00:00): Sorry, I didnt realise that everything off the north arm was effectively one big polygon.  Should have checked outside my area of edit!

I am making some changes to isolate Clybucca and Andersons Inlet from the north arm.  Hope you can check them. 

I am wanting to get some better waterway definition into OSM for NSW estuaries that I have experience on for kayaking and such.  I added the training walls recently as OSM, Google and apple maps did not have the northern training walls that separate Spencer Cr from the river.  

John
Warin61 (2021-04-20 09:19:16+00:00): It is fine, I only picked it up are there was an error in the forming of the relation - that I fixed. I just wanted to warn you of that change I made so you don't think it just 'disappeared'. 

The DCS Base Map has wetlands in it too - handy so you can see that bit of the river bank is 'swampy' before hand. 

Myself - I add data to OSM well before a trip so the information I can get is in OSM and rendered (OSMand does a monthly update .. so 2 months before I should finish my OSM edits). After the trip I can add any details I want. 

As far as 'overseeing you edits' .. ha. Too much to do, like getting ready for my next trip. Enjoy yours.
Lejun (2021-04-16 09:42:17+00:00): Erreur de ma part, je pensais que « Envoi individuel » sous JOSM allait créer des groupes de modifications distincts.
SekeRob (2021-04-16 13:37:17+00:00): Someone in the area really likes to add turn restrictions at roundabouts and turn pikes when not signed at all, or make them up, the favorite, No left/right turn or as one yesterday, the sign saying 'only straight on or right', but then setting an only_left_turn. Non ho capito niente.
Anyway Navigators know BUT, if there is a sign I think it's appropriate to create one, at least I will leave those alone. My view is evolving on the usefulness... convey what the signs tell drivers thru traffic signs.
ciao
ualios (2021-04-16 16:30:15+00:00): Anche in presenza di specifici segnali presenti nella realtà, è prassi semplificare le informazioni di navigazione. Aggiungere relazioni superflue significa spesso anche aumentare la percentuale di errori laddove se ne potrebbe fare tranquillamente a meno.
Per quanto mi riguarda anche i sensi di marcia lasciati sarebbero superflui. E' prassi inserirli per indicare il divieto di inversione di marcia non scontato per il navigatore. Visti però gli spazi ristretti neppure il navigatore farebbe in tempo darci una eventuale istruzione errata.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:30:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Vonter (2021-10-04 05:19:03+00:00): Hello! Nice work mapping the building. Looks like you added a subway_entrance as well (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8634835218). Is this entrance connected to the railway station or is it an entrance to the Ripon building itself? 

subway_entrance is generally used for entrances to railway/public transport stations, so entrance=staircase would be more appropriate if this is an entrance to a tunnel into the Ripon building.
philippec (2021-04-17 14:53:26+00:00): Jakka toch,
op forum osmnl is zoiets al voldoende  besproken.
Zomaar deleten kan toch niet.
Hoe geraken we dan bij 4A ?
Aan de vaartkant is er een bordje C3 met onderborden uitgezonderd aangelanden en PRIVE TERREIN.
Een vonnis hangt niet uit, ik weet niet of ernaar te linken valt.
Ik denk dat ze die vervelende wandelaars van de vaart met hun honden weg willen houden.
Mapillary is komende.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-09 11:34:33+00:00): Olá,

esta restrição de conversão incluída por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12435144

Foi quebrada por outro mapeador.

Você poderia excluir ou consertar ela?
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-09 11:37:07+00:00): Hi,

this conversion restriction that you included:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12435144

It was broken by another mapper.

Could you delete or fix it?
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-09 11:37:41+00:00): Привет,

это ограничение преобразования, которое вы включили:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12435144

Его сломал другой картограф.

Не могли бы вы удалить или исправить?
Jose Luis Infante (2021-04-16 15:17:25+00:00): Hola,
aleshores ha canviat el número, no? Pots modificar-ho?
Salutacions!
Vinber (2021-04-16 16:44:10+00:00): Bonjour,
est-ce un projet de train ou en construction ?
Sachant qu'à coté vous avez ajouté un aéroport ?

Pouvez vous être plus explicite dans vos commentaires ?

Bonne journée
Russ McD (2022-11-08 02:12:37+00:00): Way : 931355389 - I surveyed this road when it became a dual carriageway several years ago - maybe I missed this link, so I checked the more recent aerials.
As suspected, just another fictitious Grab road.  THERE IS NO U TURN HERE ! Its a solid grass median.
Deleted now.
Russ McD (2022-11-08 01:56:20+00:00): sujatha_1 
Regarding Way: 931305028 - this way and a few others close by have been drawn connecting to BOTH carriageways of Hwy 201.
This is wrong and dangerous for anyone using a GPS looking for a U-turn. 
The aerial imagery clearly shows a grass median here so the service road you have added is mapped INCORRECTLY.
Please check ALL your edits and change any other similar mistakes. I have corrected the ones I have found.
streckenkundler (2021-04-16 11:01:56+00:00): Hallo Günthi,

du hattest bei diesem Changeset um Überprüfung gebeten. Für die ersten Schritte mit JOSM sieht es doch gut aus... eine Anmerkung: die Information des Punktes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8634453614
muß an den Umriss es Gebäudes...https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931358585 
Dafür gibt es in JOSM eine Funktion. Die heißt Geometrie ersetzen. Diese hast du aber erst, wenn du die Erweiterung utilsplugin2 eingebunden hast... 
Übrigens sind die Brandenburger Geodaten für OSM freigegeben. Vor allem die Luftbilder solltest du nutzen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

Für weitere Fragen kannst du mich gerne anfunken. 

Viele Grüße aus Lübben,

Sven
Günthi (2021-04-16 12:21:20+00:00): Danke Dir für die Rückmeldung. 
Habe mit Street Complete am Handy begonnen Einträge vorzunehmen. Musste für ein paar genauere Angaben an den Rechner. 
Muss mich so langsam hinein fummeln.