piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jb54osm (2021-07-03 19:53:33+00:00): Dag A67-A67,
Weet je zeker dat je het goede pad hebt voor de naam Van Embden? Er is een fietspaadje in het Neherpark (voormalige PTT-lab, aan de overkant); het begint daar met een stukje Neherpark ('autostraat'), op de parkeergarage wordt het een fietspad en staan er de bordjes Van Embdenpad (met uitleg, hij is de architect) en vervolgens wordt het weer Neherpark voor auto's.
In Rusthout zelf heb ik nog nooit naambordjes gezien voor de wandelpaadjes.
Ik wil er desnoods zondag of maandag een kleine wandelingetje aan wagen.

Groetjes,
Jan
A67-A67 (2021-07-04 19:43:14+00:00): Hallo,
De naam 'Van Emdenpad' staat in de BGT op dit pad. Aangezien het niet aansluit op de rest van het pad en er volgens jou waarschijnlijk geen straatnaambordjes staan, zal ik de naam weer verwijderen.
danieldegroot2 (2022-03-19 16:49:03+00:00): やあ、yuiseki。

OpenStreetMapへようこそ。便利な情報やリンクを含む広範囲な歓迎メッセージをプライベートメッセージとして送りました。

残念ながら、あなたの変更点すべてについてフィードバックをすることはできません。ローカル・コントリビューターが時間があれば、適切な方法でこれを行うことができます。

貢献いただきありがとうございます。

ダニエル

-

Hey yuiseki,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have sent you an extensive welcome message with useful information and links as a private message.

Unfortunately I can't give feedback on all your changes. A local contributor may do this where appropriate, if they have time to do so.

Thank you for contributing,

Daniel
eggie (2021-07-20 18:42:57+00:00): Dag Guusje

oneway=no hoort niet op reguliere wegen.
Beter dus verwijderen. 
Gebouwen zijn import vanit het kadaster. Wat was er niet oke aan Berkstraat 30 en 28. De oude vorm leg ik weer even terug.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-05 09:00:22+00:00): Dag sipigamer,

Schuiben met de kaart in editmodus levert nogal een schade op. Houd het gebied van je edits klein. Beter een paar keer meer uploaden dan alles in één keer.
Probeer te voorkomen dan de landuse aan de wegen vastplakt. Vaak help het gebruik van de linker alttoets hierbij.
Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107359285
Ik zal de schade herstellen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-05 08:56:08+00:00): Dag sipigamer

Probeer svp aan te geven in je commentaar bij upload wat je edits inhouden.

Mapse,
eggie
gscscnd (2023-07-29 08:46:12+00:00): Czy to nie jest duplikat istniejącego obiektu kawiarni?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2442802792
SomeoneElse (2021-07-04 10:24:57+00:00): It looks like an admin boundary update broke here the AONB boundary. I've joined the AONB boundary up by joining the stray end of the "AONB only" way to the bit of admin boundary that was a member of both relations.  Maybe the AONB should follow the admin boundaries west, but I don't have any info on that.
Colin Smale (2021-07-04 11:25:19+00:00): If this was me, I apologise and I will fix it up! I have never found any "evidence" (in the broadest sense) whether an AONB, or National Park or similar includes the foreshore or not, so I tend to follow the precedent set by the creator of the protected area. It gives a very inconsistent picture across the UK, but it's not really my area. I wonder if there is some general jurisprudence on this, or if each protected area is determined separately?
Colin Smale (2021-07-04 11:30:04+00:00): It looks like this one is clearly intended to cover the foreshore, extending down to the admin boundary at MLWS. http://www.norfolkcoastaonb.org.uk/content/maps/map-sections.php
SomeoneElse (2021-07-04 12:41:13+00:00): Thanks for fixing!
Branko Kokanovic (2022-12-03 18:47:30+00:00): Gledam Kursumliju, rekoh ko je dodao ove ulice sa osisanom latinicom i vidim tebe u ovom changesetu, rekao bih sa "pocetka karijere":) Razmisli da ih popravis, sa ovim iskustvom:) Ili ako hoces, nije ni meni problem, ali ne bih da ti diram u tvoju tvorevinu bez pitanja:)
Sabering (2022-12-07 18:35:31+00:00): Ma nema problema, mada sam trenutno zauzet i u OSM-u a i u pravom zivotu do nove godine tako da ne mogu da dodam cirilicu u skorije vreme, ti ako hoces mozes slobodno ako te to jest ne mrzi posto je ono Kursumlija mali grad pa tako da nije nesto od velikog znacaja.
Branko Kokanovic (2022-12-07 20:28:31+00:00): Evo query da se vidi šta je na latinici od ulica: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1oNO. Ne liči mi da će biti teško proći ovo, ne znam jel ću ja stići da radim, ali nadam se da sam pomogao i ovako:)
gurglypipe (2021-07-04 15:00:43+00:00): Hi, I’ve reverted this and your subsequent edit. As mentioned to you multiple times already, you shouldn’t tag for the renderer (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer), which appears to be what you are doing here. The beach was tagged correctly before as a beach. It’s not a golf bunker! Various other changes in this changeset and your subsequent one are also obviously not correct.

Please can you get in touch about your edits. I and other local mappers would love to help you out so you can contribute to OpenStreetMap in the Furness area. At the moment, though, you’re causing work for others to clean up after your edits. Thanks.
Artasen (2021-07-04 15:25:13+00:00): I agree.and changing paths which are public footpaths as noted in https://www.mapthepaths.org.uk/
and https://apps1.wdm.co.uk/Pipcumbriahms/map.aspx?cg=PROW 
is irresponsible at best and could have much worse consequences. 
There is extensive notes on how golf courses should be mapped in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course. To convert a whole beach ino a golf bunker is ridiculous. As was changing Dunnerholme Cottages into offices. Please seek help!
user_2066394 (2021-07-03 21:02:30+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
Kogacarlo (2021-07-10 19:15:25+00:00): Waldhans, du hast eine Wärmehalle umgenannt nach Rundbogenhalle. Bist du dir sicher? Ich bin um 99,9 % sicher das es eine Wärmehalle ist ;) Und links daneben ist sicherlich auch keine Rundbogenhalle. gruss Carlo
Kogacarlo (2021-07-10 19:33:52+00:00): Okay anscheinend habe ich da Namen an einer Ecke plaziert. Das war natürlich mein Fehler. Ich habe die beiden anderen Rundbogenhallen zurück plaziert, die würde ich gern im Wald controllieren.
waldhans (2021-07-11 14:33:43+00:00): Hast du einen (anerkannten) Plan ueber die Anlagen? Im Detail finde ich da immer Unterschiede. Und deine Rundbogenhalle als Punkt koennte mit DGM Schummerung zu Rechteck ergaenzt werden.
Marek-M (2021-07-05 05:50:01+00:00): Cześć, na jakiej podstawie dokonałeś edycji w tym changesecie? Może niektóre zmiany mają sens ale dodałeś restaurację Morze Sushi https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8890587713 w innym budynku niż się ona w rzeczywistości znajduje (jest już ona dodana ze szczegółami w prawidłowym miejscu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6988772558). Usunąłeś istniejący sklep monopolowy piwniczka z pełnymi danymi i wstawiłeś nowy uproszczony https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8890587712. Moim zdaniem cały zestaw zmian nadaje się do wycofania. Byłeś tutaj, że tyle zmian powprowadzałeś? Jakie jest źródło Twoich danych?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107361027
Marek-M (2021-07-05 05:56:28+00:00): Czemu dodajesz tag bus=yes do platformy transportowej.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform

 Ten znacznik powinien trafiać chyba tylko do highway=stop_position
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position
Marek-M (2021-07-06 19:32:33+00:00): Wycofałem ten changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107517956
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-07-10 15:16:40+00:00): لماذا تصر على وضع الاسم الانجليزي على الرغم من أن اللغة الرسمية هي العربي والاسم الشائع هو العربي، الانجليزي يكون على الوسم name:en
Elyana IRM-ED (2022-12-15 09:24:05+00:00): Hi, rnitinatsangsit.
Thanks for your mapping contributions. Your edit looks awesome. But due to its crossing with water body, I noticed this object (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/961082756) looks more like a sluice gate. So, maybe this tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dsluice_gate) is more suitable. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know. Feel free to discuss.
Thank you. Happy mapping!
Nithinat S (2022-12-17 03:47:03+00:00): Yes, the tag waterway=sluice_gate can be added to that building.
smaprs (2021-07-03 19:56:03+00:00): Olá, por favor não faça testes no OSM ou upload de arquivo gpx direto sem conectá-lo à rede viária significativa. Ok? Grato
ElliottPlack (2021-10-29 02:48:00+00:00): Hello there, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I hope you've been welcomed already! I see you're into Strava and mapping for exercise routing. I am into that as well, so I can appreciate this sort of edit, but there are some OSM norms to be aware of when working around routing. The map and data is for many purposes and so it should be maintained considering all of them. These BGE tracks are real paths and the utility companies may use this data for their purposes. I like to jog along these paths and came across a BGE crew once. They said it is fine to run there, the no trespassing only applies to motor vehicles (they don't want cars or ATVs back there). BGE typically owns the land in Maryland parks where the power line tracks become paths too. Technically they would be considered private the same as this, but of course, that is not the case. Therefore, it is best to leave these sorts of paths in and call them highway=track, which are unmaintained, typically unpaved roads, used for utility vehicle access. I map the ones along the BGE rights of way, railroads, and fire roads in the reservoirs this way. Keep up the good mapping! -Elliott
spalt (2021-10-29 03:12:07+00:00): hi elliott, thanks for the comment.. i definitely agree but in this particular case the BGE access road ends and there's no apparent path from there connecting to the other Patapsco trails.. or if there was one it wasn't obvious to me.  The original path went through several backyards on homes on Amore Circle as well.
user_5359 (2021-07-07 08:11:40+00:00): Hello? What is the meaning of the key "addr:pak"?
Komadinovic Vanja (2021-07-07 08:34:05+00:00): Hi,

It's abbreviation for Poštanski Adresni Kod, it's additional data about address that Pošta Srbije is assigning to addresses. There is wiki page, unfortunately only in Serbian, about this https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poštanski_adresni_kod
eggie (2021-07-04 17:45:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution..
I merged your info with the present addressnode
Greetz
eggie
armanic (2021-07-07 07:25:09+00:00): Hi,
Thanks. I am a newbie, so I don't fully understand what happened. Was this restaurant already known, but not on this place? And where is the photo which I took and (hopefully) was uploaded when I created the POI? 
Regards, Arman
eggie (2021-07-07 07:38:03+00:00): Hi Arman,
Your contribution was okay.. but we always use the BAG addressnode.
This was my edit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107400659
and 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107400659
I only merged your contribution with the present addressnode. 
An address has to be unique. 

This was your edit  
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107362956
No picture was attached... 

All your info is still present. 

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-07-07 07:46:09+00:00): The present info https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2849428530
The_JF (2021-09-07 20:31:24+00:00): Is the old railway viaduct still permissive for foot? Although owned by the harbour look likes public open space as part of regeration, which will have a new extinction onto the network rail bit soon. can you access it by bike?    
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTr9h0j6Cuw&t=305s
Filip009 (2021-07-18 19:18:07+00:00): Ahoj, budovy, čo si odstránil v budúcom zbernom dvore ešte nie sú nikde viditeľné, ale už sú postavené. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957426945 ; 957426944 ; 957426946
*Martin* (2021-07-19 06:57:20+00:00): aha, prepac, vies revertnut?
Filip009 (2021-07-19 08:42:12+00:00): Hej hej :)
Futur3r (2021-07-03 20:32:59+00:00): Salut,

pas besoin de rajouter name=cimetière car landuse=cemetery décrit déjà l'objet.

Merci
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107363947
aweech (2021-07-03 23:09:46+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions. In OpenStreetMap, residential addresses are mapped at the location of the house, not attached to the street. I'm not sure which side of the street 7891 is on. If you'd like to map the address, you can create a node and use the Address preset and fill out the fields.
Sandal man (2021-07-13 18:33:28+00:00): Hola, gracias por tus contribuciones al osm, pero ¿por qué dibujas las carreteras vacías en las señales de tráfico? 
Saludos Jan
Jordi MF (2021-07-21 08:37:09+00:00): Hola SIGPobla,
En primer lloc, gràcies per intentar millorar OSM.
Malauradament, ees edicions que has realitzat no pareixen correctes. Què pretgenies indicar? Has afegit moltes línies sense etiquetes que no tenen cap significat. Algunes senyals de trànsit afegides sí que pareixen correctes, com els "ceda el paso", però en la resta hi ha molts errors. Per favor, indica'ns què pretenies senyalitzar o haurem de revertir/corregir els canvis. Moltes gràcies,
Jordi
Sandal man (2021-07-24 16:08:47+00:00): Ways without tags eliminades (87!!)
czubi (2021-07-04 09:19:49+00:00): Hallo Tobias, ich weis StreetCompleet hat dir die Frage gestellt wie der Fußweg heist und du hast sie auch richtig beantwortet oder gerendert sieht das jetzt irgendwie hochggradig Schei..e aus. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107364968#map=18/50.97686/11.02547&layers=N
OddlyAngled (2021-07-05 22:08:34+00:00): most or all of these campsites do not appear to be legal, they're very close to the trail or the river. did you confirm that they are at least 33m/100f from both?
Gadiel Rachelson (2021-07-06 03:45:33+00:00): You're actually correct that they're not always 100 ft from the river and trail. But to me these are some of the only campsites in a long stretch,  so I would want people to know where something reasonable is. But feel free to erase them.
shrddr (2021-07-09 20:20:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=76079544 был building=service стал building=yes, почему так?
Mashin (2021-07-04 01:55:18+00:00): Hi,
sorry what is going on in this changeset? You changed parking lot to park and then made a service road cross (twice) a golf course building.
Maciej9 (2026-03-11 23:25:40+00:00): Dlaczego access=private?
phidauex (2021-07-03 21:53:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding this! I just rode it and was about to add it when I noticed you had beat me by two hours. :)

I tweaked the geometry a bit from my GPX trace and added surface information and some details. Can you confirm if the trail is called Boulder Canyon Trail, not an extension of the Boulder Creek Trail?
jat255 (2021-07-04 04:19:25+00:00): Perhaps we passed each other, as I added it after riding it for the first time! 

I used the kml provided by boulder open space as the source, so hopefully your trace wasn't too different (I'm not often and editor, so it's possible I did something wrong of course too).

According to the open space folks, the proper name is "Boulder Canyon Trail" 

(https://www.bouldercounty.org/open-space/parks-and-trails/boulder-canyon-trail/)
phidauex (2021-07-04 23:54:41+00:00): We were the ones with a baby trailer with a CO flag on it, if you saw us! Your import looked good, I just adjusted the underpass geometry a bit, extended the trail access tags to the whole segment, and added them to the route relation for the overall trail.

Good edits and thanks for updating the map!
eggie (2021-07-05 14:33:52+00:00): Dag Jurgen..

Kijk even of dat bord highway=give_way nog van toepassing is vlak voor de buiging naar rechts aan de Stobbeweg.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-05 14:46:43+00:00): Wellicht kunnen de notes op de kaart nu ook dicht?
gr eggie
habi (2024-09-02 10:04:56+00:00): Ciao chatelao
Ich bin grad auf einer 'Mission' die Addressdaten rund um Bern anzuschauen.
Da tauchte der Familiengarten hier als roter Fleck auf: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=7.38548&lat=46.95949&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=no_addr_street
Die Gartenhüsli tauchen nicht als adressierbar im Katasterplan Bern auf.
Könnte es ächt sein, dass das nicht `addr:housenumber'n sind, sondern Parzellen-Nummern, also vielleicht besser mit `ref`?
E Gruess,
habi
Alexmol (2021-07-03 21:38:01+00:00): Olá.
Porque razão eliminou o posto de carregamento ?
vantunes (2021-07-07 12:38:49+00:00): Oi
Eliminei porque estava no local errado.
Acrescentei mais a frente.
Alexmol (2021-07-07 13:00:51+00:00): Olá.
Bastava ter movido o ponto. O posto novo que criou tinha detalhes errados, tinha por exemplo capacity=22, o capacity é o número de lugares do posto não a potência. 

Cumprimentos
Alexandre Moleiro
skorasaurus (2021-07-15 15:42:27+00:00): hi, thanks for mapping although I'm confused why you added the abandoned cleveland/columbus/southwestern rail line. 

Abandoned railways are generally only added if there's physical remnants of the railroad visible to the naked eye. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=abandoned?uselang=en) I've been on lorain road countless times as a bicyclist and driver and there's no physical presence that there used to be a rail line there. 

(I haven't been on eastland way in sometime either - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961116005 but I don't think there's any physical infrastructure or remnants of a rail line there either...) 

If you're looking to map historical items that are no longer physically present. https://openhistoricalmap.org or umap would be more appropriate.
marczoutendijk (2022-02-12 19:39:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5689


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Seandebasti (2021-07-04 12:03:55+00:00): Hi, why did you change a highway road to railway? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265768624) Can you fix it please? Why is their a trunk link and a bridge. It looks weird. thanks
DressyPear4 (2021-07-03 21:22:57+00:00): Olá essas vias não devem ser classificadas como terciárias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107367306
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
literan (2021-07-04 20:46:23+00:00): вообще, номера отделений были разные. Возможно, одно для физлиц, второе для юр лиц (или вип-клиентов). У Сбера такое бывает...
Som (2021-07-05 07:59:46+00:00): А вы правы. Я сверял через сайт Сбербанка, и увидел только одно, с номером, который в итоге оставил. Но если там включить отображение отделений для юрлиц, то отображается и второе, как "Подразделение продаж клиентам малого бизнеса №9038/22199".

Есть предложения, что делать?
По факту вход и помещение одно, так что ставить отдельную точку для второго было бы неправильно.
literan (2021-07-05 08:10:45+00:00): честно говоря, не знаю, что делать. Обычно это мапят как два отделения, но состоянию на местности это, получается, противоречит.

я бы поднял обсуждение на форуме
timmito (2021-07-03 20:53:37+00:00): Halle kartenmaler, Danke für die Ergänzung. Ist "Buswendeplatz" wirklich der Name oder doch eher eine Beschreibung, also description? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
kartenmaler (2021-07-04 09:33:38+00:00): Hallo Timmito, 
eine schwierige Frage. Einen offiziellen Namen hat das Stück Fahrbahn nicht. "Buswendeplatz" ist wird örtlich benutzt um den Ort als Treffpunkt zu benennen. Die Verwendung "Buswendplatz" als Name erleichtert Ortsfremden, den Treffpunkt zu finden.
timmito (2021-07-04 10:25:53+00:00): Alles klar, wenn es allgemein bekannt ist, ist es kein Problem. Wenn es nur sehr örtlich teilweise bekannt ist, ist loc_name ggf. besser. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#M.C3.B6gliche_Schl.C3.BCsselvarianten
Kogacarlo (2021-08-09 22:34:16+00:00): Hoi Joop, ik zie dat je wegen hebt getekend op camping De Spekberg. Netjes tussen de landuse zoals ik dat vroeger ook deed. Jammergenoeg klopt de landuse nogal slecht en dat is hier ook. Heb je geen zin om het AHN ook te gebruiken in JOSM? Op het AHN zijn de wegen perfect te zien en dan klopt het tenminste meteen. Groeten Carlo
Joopvdl (2021-08-10 11:49:20+00:00): Hallo Carlo,

Het feit dat de wegen "netjes" tussen de landsuses in ligt is omdat dit zo al was. Er was een mooi vrij pad vrijgelaten door 3Dshapes waar de wegen precies liepen. Ikzelf heb de landuses hier dan ook niet aangeraakt en enkel de wegen toegevoegd. Ik heb nog nooit van AHN gehoord, na kort zoeken kwam ik er achter dat het voor Actueel Hoogtebestand Nederland staat. Ik zal eens gaan uitzoeken wat ik hier mee kan, ik zie hem zo 1-2-3 niet tussen de afbeeldingslagen instaan.
Gr, Joop
Kogacarlo (2021-08-10 17:49:08+00:00): Het mooie van de hillshadelaag van het AHN is dat je door het bladerdek van de bomen heen kijkt en wegen en paden perfect ziet liggen. Er is een draadje op het forum dat er over gaat: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=32187 Groetjes,
Joopvdl (2021-08-23 16:04:15+00:00): Klopt het dat je contact moet leggen met ESRI NEDERLAND om toegang te krijgen tot deze beelden?
Kogacarlo (2021-08-26 21:04:47+00:00): Ik heb ze inderdaad een mailtje gestuurd en kreeg prompt toestemming.
monotar (2021-09-16 15:13:12+00:00): Die Route Meißen-Osterzgebirge gibt es schon:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/907509

Ist die Route schon offiziell beschlossen und/oder ausgeschildert? Dann lieber die Originalroute anpassen und das state=proposed wegnehmen, sonst wird das hier doppelt.
avena701 (2021-09-16 19:04:45+00:00): Ahja, danke für den Hinweis. Was ich eingetragen habe (neue Relation), ist wirklich beschildert. Der südliche Teil der Radroute II-16 ist *nicht* beschildert. Im Falle von SachsenNetz Rad bin ich persönlich nicht dafür, unbeschilderte Abschnitte einzutragen, auch nicht als proposed. Um aber jetzt keine Diskussion darüber zu starten, schlage ich vor, das beide Relationen bleiben, aber die alte (proposed) Relation abgekürzt auf den unbeschilderten südlichen Abschnit wird. Das kann ich auch gerne machen. Gib mal ein Zeichen, was du denkst.
monotar (2021-09-16 20:24:51+00:00): Ja, ich weiß nicht wie der Status der Route ist. Im 2019er Plan war sie ja noch in Klammern gesetzt (soll das heißen unfertig?). Dresden Elbland ist nichts verlinkt und Symbol hat sie wohl auch noch keins. Wichtig wäre halt noch ein passendes Ref, SNR ist ja nur der sächsische Projektname fürs Radnetz, sonst würde jede Route so dargestellt. Prinzipiell würde ich eher die alte Relation bevorzugen wegen der History. Dann lieber die alte umtaggen, weil die wird lange bestehen bleiben während die Planung nur temporär ist. 

Proposed ist halt für alles was erstmal amtlich beschlossen ist (auch ohne aktuell vorhandenene Wege), gilt ja auch für genehmigte Straßen so. Die Ausschilderung ist ja an für sich nur eine Formalie und wird in Sachsen gerade landkreisweise vorangetrieben. Sonst könnte man D4 ja auch austragen, war (ist?) ja auch lange unvollständig ausgeschildert gewesen.