piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2016-08-22 14:46:50+00:00): GT21, вы противоречите сами себе.  
  
Во-первых, написав «Сделал» вы утверждаете, что данные стали лучше отражать местность, но вы сами недавно написали, что в этом месте вы не были. Это значит, что, может быть, вы сделали карту лучше, а, может быть, и не сделали.  
  
Во-вторых, вы пишете, что «удалили здание, которого там не существует». Опять то же самое. Раз вы там не были, то откуда уверенность, что здания там нет. Возможно, там находится именно здание. d1g уже указал вам на это.  
  
В-третих, вы написали, что «ваша задача как картографа - исправлять ошибки». Но ошибка - это не только неправильный способ обозначения, но и неправильное соответствие между картой и местностью. Удалив один неправильный объект, вы должны были добавить на его место один правильной (в этом месте ведь что-то есть), но вы этого не сделали. Значит, ошибка на карте не исправлена.  
  
Я написал автору удалённых объектов (ezhik04) личное сообщение с просьбой уточнить что это за объекты и сообщить, существуют ли они сейчас.  
  
Искать ошибки это полезное занятие. Но когда вы исправляете их в местах, где вы не бываете, нужно прислушиваться к местным участникам. Вас никто не оскорблял (обращение на «ты» не является оскорбительным), но вы повели себя неконструктивно. Пока мы ждём ответ от ezhik04, можете посмотреть как работают сотрудники MapBox (они тоже исправляют ошибки по всему миру):  
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38569721  
  
Если вы не знаете английского языка, то вкратце сообщу, что участник соединил две дороги, которые не соединены в действительности. На просьбу назвать причину этого соединения участник самостоятельно отменил свой пакет правок и не стал просить доказать ему его неправоту.
mavl (2016-08-25 15:31:26+00:00): Автор удалённых объектов не ответил.  
  
Удалённые объекты из этого пакета правок и ещё из одного восстановлены. Значения тега name перенесены в тег description.  
  
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41691187]
d1g (2016-08-22 08:47:12+00:00): на местности был?
user_751601 (2016-08-22 10:16:43+00:00): если у тебя есть претензии, то высказывай законченными предложениями, имеющими смысл
d1g (2016-08-22 10:24:40+00:00): Здравствуйте GT21!

Спасибо за интерес к Саратовской области.

Можно поинтересоваться, когда последний раз вы были в Крутец, Саратовская область, Россия?
kipala (2020-12-03 17:34:51+00:00): The border set for Kinondoni / Dar es Salaam - Tanzania is the ward, not municipality of. Kinondoni. Rename the set Kinondoni ward, otherwise misleading.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-21 20:37:21+00:00): Thanks
Luis36995 (2016-12-06 14:26:35+00:00): Delete highway - Reverse change 41601983
Fod (2016-08-22 11:13:41+00:00): Hi hagedorn.

A lenghty discussion is going on on the Danish "OSM Talk" mailing list regarding your edit

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-dk/2016-August/thread.html

(Entry "Sur bonde" ~ "Angry farmer")

Can your reveal some of the details around the circumstances?

Best Regards,

-- 
Jakob
hagedorn (2016-08-28 20:21:39+00:00): Hi Jakob, thanks for asking. I translated the mail-thread by google, so I got a rough idea of the discussion. 

Actually the osmand app proposed a different route, and i manually diverted the track in order to reach the location Rispebjerg to the east of this street and its farm.

We went there by bicycle (2 adults, 2 children). 60 seconds after entering the street (it has a stone marking "Brogaard", but no explicit restriction sign) a man came in a black car, speeding like crazy, shouting "You have no right to be here!" and made sure, we left immediatly. I wondered, if he was concerned about his farm, where apparently he keeps some mass live stock (pork production).

Anyway, I think the osm-related problem is the foot path, leading from the street to the location Rispebjerg. I don't know if this path actually exists (for obvious reasons :-) but it is shown in close proximity to the mass animal production facilities.

Regards, Hans
Kontinentalverschieber (2016-08-28 13:43:36+00:00): Ist das in irgendeiner Form offiziell, dass der Höllentalsteig ausschließlich für den Aufstieg zugelassen sein soll (oneway=yes)? Es ist aufgrund des Gegenverkehrs sicher nicht intelligent dort abzusteigen. Aber wenn es nicht explizit verboten ist, sehe ich keine Grundlage für diese Einbahnstraßenregelung.
roadyboy (2016-08-28 20:54:43+00:00): Ich hatte bisher nur vom Aufstieg was gelesen und gehört, nie vom Abstieg über diese Route. Aber du magst Recht haben, eine offizielle Vorschrift dazu ist mir auch nicht bekannt. Von mir aus kannst du das oneway=yes entfernen.
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-10-28 06:01:48+00:00): Hi Super-Map,
I modified this road (Way 438336827), change to residential highway and smoothing the geometry based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you.
Derick Rethans (2016-08-22 09:27:41+00:00): Is that really a car parts shop at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4360656493#map=18/51.74848/-0.76755 ?
SomeoneElse (2016-08-25 18:27:18+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4360697891 really an "amenity=fuel"?  If so, what's the significance of "1826 gate combi" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/682140 ?
freebeer (2019-01-29 02:28:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66723792 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal home castle
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-21 22:21:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 41552369, 41552295, 41552116, 41552265.
wille (2016-10-19 11:02:05+00:00): Olá, Uniline Rastreadores

Ficamos muito felizes de ter a colaboração de empresas brasileiras ao mapa do OpenStreetMap! Juntos estamos fazendo o melhor mapa do mundo. Lembramos que não é permitido copiar dados do Google Maps ou de outros mapas comerciais. Utilizamos apenas fontes de dados livres, como IBGE ou dados próprios. Além disso, no OSM não abreviamos os nomes como Rua, Avenida, Travessa, etc. Abreviaturas são permitidas apenas quando não sabemos algum sobrenome que faz parte do nome da via.

Muito obrigado pela colaboração! Se tiver alguma dúvida sobre OSM, estou à disposição!
user_5359 (2016-08-22 17:11:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. 

Will you paint a golf course? Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
RCFoster (2016-08-21 23:17:19+00:00): Forgot to add edit description.

Moved placemarker to correct location.  Added address and changed elevation.
letihu (2016-09-14 06:30:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282044602/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282044603/history
überschneiden sich.
vielleicht sollte man sie zusammenfassen.
Alecs01 (2016-08-22 10:29:53+00:00): Please don't mess it up with names, "Museo Criminologico" is not turkish, main name=* should be in italian, and the russian name was already there
Derick Rethans (2016-08-22 09:28:38+00:00): Is there really an ATM in the middle of a parking place?
user_5359 (2016-08-22 17:08:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a (For direct information: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr).

Please notice: Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building (home ist private description not for all user of the data)
Athalis (2016-08-22 08:26:47+00:00): I think deleting is the wrong way, as it removes valid information. How about mapping the other suburbs too? Probably better as areas?
saper (2016-08-22 16:13:16+00:00): working on it... the problem is:
- Offenbach is not fully covered by official districts (vague "downtown" is not there)
- Nominatim picks the nearest suburb and adds it to all street names etc.

I found some district boundaries, and yes, mapping a real boundary would be a way better solution.
saper (2016-08-22 16:38:59+00:00): Well, I have restored it for now. It will take a while to get the boundaries right....
saper (2016-08-24 02:30:14+00:00): District boundary is now drawn in the (misnamed) changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41651634
Athalis (2016-08-24 19:31:03+00:00): Thank you very much for the work :)

However it looks like something went wrong in the area of Gravenbruch, all existing nodes have been placed on a straight line as you can see quite good at https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=41651634

If you're having trouble fixing this I could try to revert the affected ways.
Athalis (2016-08-24 21:03:04+00:00): Someone else was faster, fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41672397
aseerel4c26 (2016-08-24 22:12:31+00:00): thanks!

Suggestion, map place=suburb as area like I did in Dietzenbach, see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/i11 . Try the "where am I" for places inside a suburb and inside no suburb. 

The same problem applies to Hanau, if I remember correctly. 

Warum babbeln wir hier eigentlich Englisch? ;-)
saper (2016-08-24 22:16:51+00:00): Naja, mein hessisch ischt nix so gut.
Ich weiss nicht, was ich bei Gravenbruch falsch gemacht hätte, ich habe höchstens die Grenze gesplittet. 

Mit area es wäre eine gute Lösung, man muss nur die Grenzen irgendwie bekommen...
Athalis (2016-08-24 22:28:55+00:00): Ich habe mit Englisch angefangen weil der Changeset auf Englisch war.

Wahrscheinlich bist du ausversehen auf "l" gekommen; sowas passiert schnell mal. Deshalb habe ich mit whodidit diverse RSS Feeds abboniert und prüfe ich meine Changesets meistens mit achavi nach ;)
aseerel4c26 (2016-08-25 19:20:41+00:00): @saper: zu "area": meinst du meinen Vorschlag? Ja, ich kenne die Grenzen auch nicht genau. Ich habe es, so gut ich es wusste gemacht.  Teilweise sind hier in Dietzenbach Orts-Schilder mit den Stadtteilnamen vorhanden. Ich finde es eine Schätzung der Area besser als einen Node, wo ja leider gar keine Information über die Größe vorhanden ist. Was dann passiert, sieht man bei Nominatim. Versuche es einfach mal, wenn du dich auskennst! Gerne kannst du auch, wenn du einen Teil gemacht hast, mir eine Message schreiben, dann kann ich mir es auch mal ansehen/prüfen.
adrianojbr (2016-08-24 02:11:41+00:00): olá, victor. td bem?

o padrão para cep é NNNNN-NNN (com hífen).

abraço.
Mapeiro (2017-01-24 21:53:57+00:00): Olá,

Como você conseguiu o nome "Rua Gustavo Adolfo Richlin"?

Tanto nos dados da prefeitura (que estou importando agora) como nos Correios, consta apenas como "Rua Gustavo A Richlin".
santamariense (2017-01-25 00:52:05+00:00): Desculpa estar me metendo em assunto local. Mas talvez isto responda (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustavo_Adolfo_Richlin) ou é apenas uma coincidência e aquele A não seria de Adolfo?
Victor 2015 (2017-05-01 04:39:51+00:00): Olá, exatamente o que santamariense mostrou
Supaplex (2016-08-24 11:06:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
下り専門 (2016-08-23 03:21:11+00:00): こんにちは。編集内容についてのアドバイスです。
普通の住宅の名称には「住宅」と入力する必要はありません。
空白のままにしてください。
代わりに建物の種類を選ぶときに「住宅」や「一戸建て住宅」を選んでください。
そうするとbuilding=residentialやhouseとしてタグ付けされます。
これが住宅を示すので名称を記入する必要がないということです。
アパートについては建物の種類から「集合住宅」を選びます。
アパート名がわかるならば名称に記入します。わからなければ空白にします。
つまり、名称に書くのは地物の種類ではなくて固有名詞だということです。
車庫、倉庫についてはiDエディタのプリセットからは選択できないようです。
OSMwikiを参考に＋マークで手入力でタグ付けしてください。
車庫はbuilding=garage、倉庫はbuilding=warehouseです。
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:building%3Dgarage
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:building%3Dwarehouse
同じく名称は（固有名詞以外）空にしてください。
Adib Yz (2016-09-01 08:22:40+00:00): سلام، لطفا از امکان کامنت گذاری در مپس.می فقط برای مشخص کردن مکان های اشتباه استفاده کنین.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-08-26 20:27:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 41722297, 41718622 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed unconnected node import in Iran
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:38:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
aharvey (2017-06-23 03:54:43+00:00): Looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6393754 already existed before, we should keep that way and just update the geometry. Or at the very least delete the old way when adding one with geometry not snapped to the road.
Warin61 (2017-06-23 04:51:37+00:00): Thanks for finding that. Fixed. 
What was I thinking back then?
aharvey (2017-06-23 07:50:55+00:00): also for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45646092
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438360193

I think it's better to tag a multiuse pitch as sport=netball;basketball than having two overlapping ways, after all there is only one pitch, it just happens to serve two different sports.
Warin61 (2017-06-23 08:32:36+00:00): Netball and basketball have slight different sizes of court. And where they share a surface they have different line colours too. The line colours can be tagged correctly if they are separate ways ... but not if they are ; separated sports. 

I have done one where there are tennis, netball and basket ball all on the same surface... some of these have a 90 degree rotation from one sport to the other .. with a differing number of effective pitches between sports .. not easy to do that with ; but so much easier with separate ways. 

I have done similar things with cricket/football pitches too.
HubMiner (2018-04-30 03:16:38+00:00): Hi, could you review this point:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4360968589#map=19/45.40019/-91.73509&layers=D and this discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/682468#map=19/45.40019/-91.73522&layers=N
HubMiner (2018-04-30 03:18:43+00:00): Can you confirm that this is exact location for this address?  Should this be deleted?
opendcc (2016-08-22 08:32:19+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Da gibt es noch ein paar Dinge bei dieser Brücke zu beachten:
Der Überweg heißt vermutlich nicht Brücke, sondern IST eine Brücke. Der Name kennzeichnet den vergebenen Namen, also z.B. Franz-Meier-Schildbürger-Weg.

Und man muß bei einer Kreuzung von Verkehrswegen angeben, was oben und unten ist. Die Brücke bekommt üblicherweise layer=1.

mfg Wolfgang
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-08-27 00:33:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 41723435, 41725831 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed unconnected node import in Iran
AlexDRL (2016-08-22 07:56:02+00:00): The supermarket is duplicated... and the operator of the cafe needs to be blank or in spanish
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-08-27 03:35:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41726215 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed unconnected node import in Iran
maraf24 (2016-08-22 20:57:32+00:00): Możesz mieć rację.
Problem w tym, że nie sposób tego ustalić na podstawie danych online, bo np. gis.um.wroc.pl twierdzi, że to jest Brücknera, a Zarząd Geodezji, Kartografii i Katastru Miejskiego we Wrocławiu - że to jest Kochanowskiego.
Smiljan_02 (2016-08-26 12:35:33+00:00): Hallo einleben, könntest du den Eintrag des Landtagses NRW da hin verschieben wo er auch hin gehöhrt ?
Zwischen Düsseldorf und Weberstedt liegen über 350 km, du hast eine sehr geringe Treffgenauigkeit
Hjart (2016-08-22 07:20:27+00:00): While this to some degree could be considered a "tunnel", the ecoduct already was tagged as a bridge and in cases like this I'd like to warn against splitting roads into unneccesary small parts, as this just ends up causing extra load on our database and the many tools used to process our data (which as I understand it, actually is a real problem).
I have already in the past removed many unneccesary tunnel and similar objects and might very well do it here too.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:38:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
nammala (2016-08-23 04:29:31+00:00): Hi Sabzevar,

Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting `landuse=residential` areas.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

cheers,
krishna
Derick Rethans (2016-08-22 10:31:01+00:00): I've moved the names to "name" instead of "name:en", and was puzzled by the stop name "Australia" - but it *does* seem to be called like that!
railwayjim (2016-08-22 11:39:46+00:00): Derrick, it is named after the pub opposite. However a few years ago the pub name was changed to Y Gestiana. The bus destination now made no sense. Luckily the pub has been sold and has reverted to its old name again.
I was testing editing from Maps.me app on android, hence incorrect tag. I will stick to JOSM.
marc__marc (2019-07-01 22:34:15+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4361183105
I didn't what it is : a pitch for a tents inside a building ?
Supaplex (2016-08-22 08:22:48+00:00): 請先停止編輯！由於大臺北不少學校用多重多邊形關係存在，因此不熟悉這種資料型態狀況下很容易編錯。現在很多加上去的資訊都是放在圍牆上而已。
Blimp (2017-08-15 12:17:02+00:00): Hallo Obernetter!

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du an mehrere Objekte, die bereits ein entsprechendes Tagging enthalten, ein zusätzliches Tagging angebracht hast.
Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4361206116

Das Restaurant hatte bereits einen entsprechenden Node, Du hast einen weiteren mit weniger Attributen hinzugefügt. Das hast Du auch bei dem Cafe am Amtshaus (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32555367) und dem zwischenzeitlich demolierten und wieder aufgebauten Cafe/Imbiss am Bahnhof gemacht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32730988). OpenStreetMap ist ein kollaboratives Projekt, und es erscheint mir ohne weitere Erklärung erst mal ziemlich sinnfrei was Du da machst. Wenn Du weitere bzw. neue Informationen hast, wie z.B. die Wiedereröffnung des demolierten Cafes, warum aktualisierst Du dann nicht die vorhandenen Daten, sondern legst weitere Nodes an. bzw. taggt Gebäude um? Ich möchte ungerne Deine Arbeit aufräumen und gehe nur mir Widerwillen an Bearbeitungen von anderen, wenn diese noch relativ frisch sind.

Bitte erkläre uns doch den Grund für Dein vorgehen.

Beste Grüße, Michael
user_5359 (2016-08-22 17:02:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The house number isn’t the name auf a address.
letihu (2016-09-04 11:33:03+00:00): Was könnte denn
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438377746/history
sein?
hegi (2016-09-04 11:47:12+00:00): Ein Weg an der Wiese ist das, bin ich selber mit dem Rad gefahren. Ich verstehe die Frage nicht?
hegi (2016-09-04 11:48:22+00:00): Ist es falsch gespeichert worden?
letihu (2016-09-04 15:06:32+00:00): Keine tags vorhanden, nur die leere Linie.
hegi (2016-09-04 15:19:32+00:00): Danke für die Info! Schaue ich mir heute Abend am PC an. Sollte eigentlich genau so ein Weg sein wie die, die er verbindet!
hegi (2016-09-04 15:28:15+00:00): Hab gerade angepasst
Bqaya (2016-08-24 07:21:51+00:00): LooooL
dgitto (2016-08-23 06:28:58+00:00): che cosa è U.S.L.?
Guest One (2016-08-24 12:17:11+00:00): Forse è l'Ufficio Anagrafe Assistiti? che mi sembra sia proprio li, ma non è un luogo di culto.
saintam1 (2016-08-22 16:05:39+00:00): Isn't block 70 the long one 100m to the west?
eggie (2021-09-18 06:35:58+00:00): Na jaren weeer een bijdrage, daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
manings (2016-08-22 10:28:07+00:00): Made a mistake removing rapids points, reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41611184
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
Endres Pelka (2016-08-23 20:38:58+00:00): Super informacje, ale "Budynek mieszkalny" to nie jest odpowiednia "nazwa" dla budynków mieszkalnych. building=residential (albo house, albo apartments) wystarczy.

"Sklep" też powinien być oznaczony jakimś shop=*. Pomogę, tylko proszę powiedzieć: Co ten sklep sprzedaje?
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
pyram (2016-10-22 17:37:06+00:00): Danke für die Mitarbeit, aber bitte keine Phantasiedaten eintragen:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438394124#map=19/49.47313/11.06453&layers=N

Hier existiert keine physikalisch von einem Bus nutzbare Verbindung!:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366390257/history
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:38:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
j03lar50n (2016-08-22 15:46:26+00:00): Thank you so much for this fix!
d1g (2016-08-22 12:46:21+00:00): Каждую улицу обошли и все таблички были с "улица", а не "тупик" и "проезд"?

Какой проект с 200 тысячами правок у вас ещё? Какой ник?
user_751601 (2016-08-22 12:48:41+00:00): рябиновая тупик? рябиновая проезд? рябиновая шоссе? рябиновая переулок? рябиновая колбаса?
знаете, мне уже поднадоели ваши комментарии, больше я не имею желания отвечать на них
d1g (2016-08-22 14:31:25+00:00): На чём основаны правки?
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
woodpeck_repair (2016-08-24 22:29:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India