piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
Olyon (2017-11-20 14:20:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté des nodes avec place=town pour Segré-en-Anjou Bleu, Mauges-sur-Loire, Beaupréau-en-Mauges et Sèvremoine, mais ce sont des communes (les relations pour les communes existent) mais ce n'est pas des ville. les villes et villages n'ont pas changé de nom (Champtoceaux, Beaupréau...). Je pense que ces nodes doivent disparaître.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
Robert Whittaker (2017-08-19 11:37:58+00:00): I think you've made a mistake with the postcode for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500933961 -- maybe you were trying to use ctrl+v to paste, but accidentally only hit "v".
Quarticle (2017-08-19 15:57:00+00:00): Thanks. Corrected that now.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 10:57:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Почему вы считаете, что у этих деревьев существует название и что оно такое? Есть ли там информационный стенд, на котором упоминается парк и его название? Или любой другой источник?
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 10:58:42+00:00): Это точно не названия. Не нужно описывать объекты через наименования. Откатываю.
OPerivar (2017-06-20 10:08:55+00:00): Zu den edits in dieser Gegend: 
-Ein Streifen Bäume links und rechts der Staße als landuse=forest zu taggen ist nicht gut und dann für jede Straßenseite ein eigenes zu erstellen und es mit der Straße zu verkleben ist schlecht! 
-Die place umzutaggen nur für die "eine Karte" ist Tagging für den Renderer!
-Dann sind auch sonst diverse Fehler gemacht worden, die mit ID natürlich nicht auffallen
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 11:02:04+00:00): "Парк около музея" - это не название. Исправьте, пожалуйста. А также уточните геометрию отрисованного парка. Качество снимков позволяет сделать это.
Grillo (2017-07-01 09:53:09+00:00): Du har taggat skatteverket som en butik där det säljs biljetter till evenemang osv. Som sagt, använd inte felaktiga taggar för att du inte hittar rätt.
Marych_ (2017-06-21 09:31:56+00:00): Для чего ставить  place=suburb ?
Все масивы и так обозначены.
Marych_ (2017-06-21 09:34:27+00:00): почитайте пожалуйста
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:place
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-16 11:45:30+00:00): Map edits are PUBLIC and everyone can see them. Personal points are not allowed. I removed your change.

If you want to mark personal points, use Maps.Me's bookmarks feature. Bookmarks are private and only you can see them.

Reverted in #49588768
Gazer75 (2017-07-21 09:02:12+00:00): Where did you find info about a ferry between Liabyda and Eidsdal?
Gazer75 (2017-07-21 09:03:14+00:00): Emergency routes should not be in the map as it will mess up routing.
Skippern (2017-07-21 09:06:49+00:00): The ferry routes was already mapped, I mainly only added the relations. 

I think the emergency route should be mapped, but maybe use different tagging to avoid routing problems, i.e. route=emergency_ferry
Gazer75 (2017-07-21 09:10:07+00:00): Strange... I did some editing there not long ago and didn't remember seeing this route.

Routers do not care about relations they only see the route=ferry and use that (as long as it is connected to a road)
Skippern (2017-07-21 10:28:04+00:00): I'm travelling right now, but I can change the route tag on the emergency route to avoid routing mistakes. Didn't check when the different routes was added, I just added relations on the routes. I am spending the summer months in this region, but mostly a little further north.
Gazer75 (2017-07-21 13:17:26+00:00): Found the route in the list of emergency routes. Download pdf at http://frammr.no/Ruter/Ferje and look on page 51.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Rom1 (2017-06-22 20:54:56+00:00): Bonjour, pour info, j'ai supprimé les nœuds ajoutés car les arrêts de bus existent déjà dans la base.
agentcobra (2017-06-25 17:20:21+00:00): Ok, pas de problèmes :)
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
poornibadrinath (2017-06-16 12:15:10+00:00): Hi Hjart,
  Thank you for fixing this relation. My bad, I should have commented on the changeset before I started repairing the riverbank. Can I please no what exactly was the error here? I changed only the part until the river ends to a river bank so it doesnt break the render on OSM as well as Mapbox. Just wanted to know what mistake I did so it wont be repeated again. Though I will make sure to not forgetting to comment on the changeset before the editing. Thanks again.
Best,
Poornima Badrinath
poornibadrinath (2017-06-16 12:15:27+00:00): *know
Hjart (2017-06-16 12:18:29+00:00): The multipolygon was split south of the E 39, so that we had 2 outers bordering each other.
Hjart (2017-06-16 12:19:54+00:00): I fixed it, so that now there's only 1 outer (and 3 inners)
poornibadrinath (2017-06-16 12:21:43+00:00): Oh okay. Got it. Thanks! But changing it to a riverbank makes sense right?
Hjart (2017-06-16 12:23:28+00:00): To me it does too, but apparently the official norwegian mapping agency thinks otherwise
poornibadrinath (2017-06-16 12:37:04+00:00): Right. Would having that entire stretch of coastline in a relation solved the problem? Because, as far as I know, why this river looks like the way it does now was because the coastline was not in a relation connected to the end part of the river. The river continued until the end, according to one local mapper, and it was rendering completely until sometime in end May or June beginning, when the render broke. So I would say the actual issue was adding the coastline and not linking it to the river. So if the coastline would have been put in a relation, would the problem be solved?
Hjart (2017-06-16 12:58:17+00:00): I've been looking at the history of the area a bit now and I'm still not entirely sure who's responsible for what. Important thing now is that it all works again, so I think it's better to leave it as is.
I don't putting the coastline in a relation would solve anything.
poornibadrinath (2017-06-16 13:14:58+00:00): Alright, sounds good. Thanks again
Reitstoen (2017-06-24 17:05:48+00:00): FYI: DigitalGlobe har litt offset i området du har redigert. Elvebredden ser ut til å ha vært korrekt før justering, bortsett fra der hvor det faktisk har vært fysisk endring av brygger/elvekant.
Hjart (2017-06-24 18:34:10+00:00): I did check with the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava cycle heatmaps in the area, which appeared to match quite well with the DG imagery
ma-rt-in (2017-06-17 16:42:33+00:00): hi,
 way 24543838 wird nicht dort mit einer maxhöhe von 2 m betitelt, das ist weiter nördlich erst der fall.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Alexander-II (2017-06-16 12:44:44+00:00): Возможно, правильнее было бы скорректировать уже имеющуюся точку, а не создавать новую https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2331513033
literan (2017-06-16 14:57:01+00:00): приветствую! прошу вас не менять crossing=uncontrolled	на crossing=zebra. Второй тег - бессмысленный и ненужный. Вы, конечно, можете использовать его, но не удаляйте полезный crossing=uncontrolled, указывающий на то, что переход нерегулируемый. Навигаторы предупреждают водителей о наличии таких переходов перед машиной
F-5 System (2017-06-16 15:28:11+00:00): Хорошо, я пробегусь - проверю. Вероятно это происходит из-за того, что в браузере есть отдельный выбор "Пешеходный переход" и "Пешеходный переход (зебра)". В первом случае он выглядит как точка, и я замечал на карте в этих местах отметку светофора, хотя его там нет. Поэтому я ставил зебру (выглядит как идущий человечек), считая это более правильным. Тогда перепроверю теги "uncontrolled" и "traffic_signals" в независимости от вида иконки.
literan (2017-06-17 10:06:42+00:00): я посмотрел, действительно, в iD, какая-то странная каша при выборе типа перехода. Они намешали классификацию, используемую только в Англии (пеликан/тукан/зебра) с общими видами. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing
mueschel (2017-06-17 08:13:51+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier Tags wie 'roadbike-smoothness', 'roadbike:soothness' und 'roadbike:smoothness' hinzugefügt, jeweils etwa 80 Mal.
Diese Tags gibt es bisher nicht, und sie entsprechen auch nicht den üblichen Taggingregeln.
a) 2 davon haben Schreibfehler, das letzte ist das korrekteste.
b) es müsste smoothness:roadbike heißen - das Transportmittel wird üblicherweise hinten angefügt.
c) "roadbike" ist kein bekanntes Transportmittel. Richtig wäre "bicycle" (mtb für Mountainbikes gäbe es noch)
d) smoothness für ein spezielles Transportmittel anzugeben macht in meinen Augen wenig Sinn - es ist eine Eigenschaft der Straße, die sich nicht mir dem Fahrzeug verändert.

Grüße, Jan
matchman (2017-06-17 08:46:06+00:00): Hallo Jan,
ähnlich dem mtb:scale tag geht es mir darum die Oberflächenbeschaffenheit aus der Sicht eines Rennradfahrers darzustellen und diese zu klassifizieren. Der smoothness key ist hierfür leider nicht präzise genug.
Ich würde den key in smoothness:roadbike ändern und mit meiner eigenen Klassifizierung fortfahren.
Ich wollte zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch einen Proposal process anstoßen -> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
mueschel (2017-06-19 08:51:30+00:00): Ok. Eine Dokumentation in Form eines Proposals sollte es dann schon geben. Am besten natürlich gleich mit Blick auf alle möglichen Verkehrsteilnehmer, nicht nur auf Radfahrer bezogen.
Commodoortje (2017-06-16 22:18:49+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-16 22:20:57+00:00): Ik heb je een beetje geholpen door de overtollige tags te verwijderen. Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49603834
Elke weg heeft zijn standaard eigenschappen, hier kun je zien wat de standaard restricties zijn voor welk wegtype.
Kijk hier om te zien wat de standaard tagging per wegtype is in Nederland.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
nvk (2017-06-21 00:21:01+00:00): Hi! Is this really a road? I turned it into a ferry so it's a less obvious bug, but I'm not even sure it's a valid ferry. Tell me a little more about what you were trying to digitize and maybe I can suggest better tags?
KaleenaSawyer (2017-06-21 00:30:56+00:00): Hi! Thank you for updating that! I was creating the ferry route for Top View Tours to import for the TransLoc App. 

I wasn't able to find a ferry tag to tag it with. 

Thanks  again!
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
RicoElectrico (2017-06-18 16:17:07+00:00): Wycofuję te zmiany, bo nie mają odzwierciedlenia w rzeczywistości i są chyba prywatnymi notatkami.
Supaplex (2017-06-16 14:27:36+00:00): landuse跟建築可以共存
FvGordon (2018-02-25 23:12:48+00:00): Ist die Brücke der St 2141 über die B 8 immer noch Baustelle (construction)?
beweta (2018-02-26 19:01:30+00:00): Seit dem Beginn der Bauarbeiten bin ich an der Baustelle nicht mehr vorbeigekommen. Laut einem Bericht [1] des Staatlichen Bauamtes Passau dauern die Bauarbeiten aber noch an.

[1] https://www.stbapa.bayern.de/imperia/md/content/stbv/stbapa/pressemitteilungen/nr146__2017-12-20_st2141_b8_erneuerung_bruecke_landshuter-strasse.pdf
user_3022894 (2017-06-17 19:36:55+00:00): Hallo sleske,
entschuldige die Störung, aber ich habe eine kurze Frage zu deinen jüngsten Änderungen:
Hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24570338/) hast du eine Straße zu einem verkehrsberuhigten Bereich (living_street) gemacht, aber die Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung (maxspeed) bei 30 gelassen. Ist das richtig so?
Grüße, Lukas
scai (2017-06-16 15:56:19+00:00): Hi Alec R,

im Kommentarfeld möglichst kurz das beschreiben was man gemacht hat. Dann wissen die anderen Bearbeiter ungefähr was passiert ist bzw. was passieren sollte :)

Grüße
Alex
hafoe (2018-08-16 12:30:47+00:00): multipolygon kollie/Goldhai wesentlich zu grosse Ausdehnung nach Osten
ulmtuelp (2018-08-16 12:33:58+00:00): Dann darf es gern verkleinert werden, ich habe nur Geometriefehler korrigiert.
Gazer75 (2017-11-30 11:11:09+00:00): Do not use separate way for turn lanes in OSM. Only lanes physically separated should have its own way.
Gazer75 (2017-07-01 20:24:53+00:00): Ikkje del opp vegane slik om det ikkje er fysisk skilje mellom felta. Bruk turn:lanes i staden for.
Commodoortje (2017-06-16 22:05:14+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-16 22:12:30+00:00): Ik begrijp enigzins wat je in je commentaar probeert te zeggen, maar.....
Als er passagepoortjes zijn aangebracht is het zaak deze op de bewuste positie op de weg aan te brengen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
(vermoedelijk cycle_barrier)
Staat er een rond blauw bord verplicht fietspad? Zo nee, dien je geen cycleway aan te brengen. Dan is het namelijk nog steeds een highway=residential.
Zijn de parkeerplaatsen voor de huizen ook weggehaald? Hoe komen de bewoners nu in hun garage/oprit?
.
Wil je je edit heroverwegen? Als je vragen hebt (en antwoorden) log dan even in om te communiceren op deze changeset.
letihu (2017-07-03 20:02:10+00:00): Es wäre schön, wenn der Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173215351/history#map=19/53.93654/10.31197
nicht mit der Gebäudeecke
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173215351/history#map=19/53.93654/10.31197 verbunden wäre.
Leider fehlt auch die Anbindung an 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483280431/history
Luis36995 (2017-06-19 22:00:32+00:00): 
Hi CoastalGenius, Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap, you added a lot of data in an area where it is not distinguishable with the satellite image BING, can you indicate which source was based to add this data?
wambacher (2017-06-21 14:32:58+00:00): hi, landuse=farm is obsolete. 
josm did tell you, but you ignored :(
JesseFTW (2022-02-20 21:50:23+00:00): Please don't use layer=parking_aisle ; the correct tag is service_parking_aisle . I've changed it.
GerdP (2017-08-30 06:28:28+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed several ways with typo highway=unpaved created by you.
Did you mean highway=unclassified + surface=unpaved? See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rll
JesseFTW (2022-02-20 21:54:27+00:00): Please don't use layer=parking_aisle ; the correct tag is service_parking_aisle . I've changed it.
Sargis Davtyan (2017-06-16 16:09:24+00:00): Каракала переводится как черная крепость
GerdP (2018-10-19 09:20:38+00:00): Hi!
Are you sure that there is no bridge at this point?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4919299964
E.g. ESRI sat image seems to show a bridge with a truck on it.
GerdP (2018-10-19 09:21:32+00:00): Forgot to say that the correct tag would be railway=level_crossing in case there is no bridge...
JesseFTW (2022-02-20 21:54:51+00:00): Please don't use layer=parking_aisle ; the correct tag is service_parking_aisle . I've changed it.
gileri (2017-06-26 19:34:05+00:00): Je crois qu'il y a un problème avec la forme des bâtiments :

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49596207
BCNorwich (2017-06-30 06:43:06+00:00): Thank You
chillly (2017-06-16 16:47:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM, thanks for the detail. 

We normally use the name tag on buildings for business names and use the address housename tag for the building name. Adding extra address info, such as postcode, is also helpful.

You could have added the housename tag to the building outline, but some people do add a point as you have done, especially if a building has multiple properties within it.

if you need help, please feel free to ask
Leonmvd (2017-06-17 10:52:18+00:00): Zie ook comment op je andere changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49596583 Drie dingen die hier naar mijn mening niet horen: 1. Adressen in OSM importeren we uit de BAG in Nederland, de officiële registratie. Deze hoef je dus niet nogmaals toe te voegen. 2. zie gebouwen opmerking in de andere changeset. 3. Zou landuse=retail niet passender zijn? Geldt ook voor de andere centra die je hebt aangepast. Het zijn geen overdekte malls, maar eerder verzamelingen van winkels in een straat.
Leonmvd (2017-06-17 11:08:29+00:00): Ook vat je hier de huizen aan de Westerhavenstraat binnen de mall. Deze zijn sowieso geen onderdeel daarvan.
user_3216889 (2017-06-17 20:42:46+00:00): Winkelcentrum Westerkade (zonder 'de') bestaat enkel uit de drie grote panden die in 2001 zijn opgeleverd. Alle zaken aan de oost- en noordkant van de Westerkade horen er niet bij; die bestonden al veel langer.
Leonmvd (2017-06-18 09:07:06+00:00): Dat was inderdaad ook mijn beeld.
kumarip (2019-02-27 03:54:14+00:00): Hi Rizki,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across way 501029603
way 501029605
way 501351286
way 501351285 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
Leonmvd (2017-06-17 10:48:58+00:00): Hoi Guido, ik zie dat je een aantal winkelcentra hebt aangepast ofwel toegevoegd. Je gebruikt echter ook de building = yes tag die hier niet van toepassing is. De verschillende gebouwen staan als gebouw in osm, je zou evt. area=yes kunnen gebruiken om het hele gebied te markeren. Pas je zelf deze tags aan?
Leonmvd (2017-06-17 10:52:29+00:00): Zie ook comments bij https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49596451
user_3216889 (2017-06-17 20:58:32+00:00): Winkelcentrum Sontplein bestaat officieel niet en ook niet in de volksmond.
Winkelcentrum Overwinningsplein (zonder 'het'): panden tussen Jennerstraat en Flemingstraat horen daar niet bij.
Winkelcentrum Helperplein (niet 'Helpman'): zaken aan de Verlengde Hereweg horen daar niet bij en evenmin de woningen aan de Van Royenlaan.
Leonmvd (2017-06-18 09:07:28+00:00): Mee eens Henk.
Leonmvd (2017-06-21 12:45:44+00:00): Beste Guido,
ik zie dat je de gebouw tag hebt vervangen door de retail tag. Dat is mooi, zou je ook de opmerking van Henk kunnen verwerken en de adres tags kunnen verwijderen? Ook zou het fijn zijn als je reageert op onze comments en persoonlijke berichten.
letihu (2017-07-03 19:53:57+00:00): Dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501025763/history
könnte noch etwas besser gemappt werden. Er geht jetzt noch einfach durchs Gebäude und auch auf der Gebäudemauer entlang.
RoadGeek_MD99 (2018-08-12 16:42:38+00:00): Hi PropertyVIEW®,

Thanks for your hotel edits!  However, this changeset needs to be reverted, as Tampa FL is several states away from Maryland.  Also, it it OpenStreetMap practice to spell out the abbreviations in street names, so it should be West Cypress Street.  If you want, I can fix this hotel, but you may want to check on the Tampa Airport Doubletree.  Thanks and Happy Mapping!

RoadGeek_MD99
PropertyVIEW® (2018-08-13 14:44:22+00:00): Interesting. This seems to have been a crossed wire or something. This is one of our hotels but it should not have been in Maryland. I'm not sure where that came from. We can fix it.
RoadGeek_MD99 (2018-08-13 16:55:18+00:00): Hi PropertyVIEW®,
I reverted your change on this hotel from today and last year, so that I could restore this hotel's tags, thus fixing the damaged bits.  Also merged the adjacent Aloft hotel POI into the way, as the way was only tagged with building:levels and wouldn't render.
RoadGeek_MD99.
PropertyVIEW® (2018-08-13 18:50:44+00:00): Thanks for the help. I just want to be sure we're on the same page. To clarify, the DoubleTree should not be there at all. I don't know how it did get there but that is a Tampa Florida hotel that does have a separate listing. This one should be deleted. This should just be the Aloft hotel.
RoadGeek_MD99 (2018-08-13 19:04:42+00:00): Thanks!  I think we're on the same page.  I only reviewed/fixed the two Maryland hotels: Element (was Doubletree Tampa Airport) and the adjacent Aloft.  I deleted (reverted) your changes to the misplaced Doubletree, to restore the Element I had mapped 5 years ago.  The Tampa Airport hotel in FL is all yours.  :-)
aufachse (2017-06-18 14:19:41+00:00): Hallo sedrubal,
habe dein changeset komplett zurückgesetzt, da es bestehende Relationen beschädigt hat.