piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kayle (2017-10-09 05:28:30+00:00): Ono aj tie ostatné tagy nie sú moc OK.
Je tam tourism=guest_house na tej ploche, ale pritom už tam je dávno zaznačené ubytovacie zariadenie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49042236
Pre jednu vec by mala byť jedna cesta/bod. Potom to tam zobrazuje viac krát.
kayle (2017-10-09 05:29:59+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Jeden_prvek_re%C3%A1ln%C3%A9ho_sv%C4%9Bta,_jeden_prvek_v_OSM
gazember8 (2017-10-07 12:10:25+00:00): • Celý objekt si označil [building=yes], tento tag som vymazal, keďže tá plocha nie je zastavaná celá.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530780522

• Taktiež sa chcem opýtať na označenie [amenity=childcare], podľa mňa CPPPaP neposkytuje starostlivosť o deti.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=childcare
mavl (2017-10-07 13:18:16+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47528986, 47529226, 47529938, 47530383, 47531988, 47533959, 47534034, 47534062, 47534292, 47534334, 47534452, 47534518, 47534732, 47534760, 47534798, 47535135, 47535201, 47535254, 47535995, 47536366, 47537091, 47537767, 47538510, 47539106.
rainerU (2018-04-10 07:22:21+00:00): In this and some other changesets you mapped swing gates that are closed only on high water. As barrier=swing_gate implies access=no the concerned highways are excluded from routing by common routing engines. I started adding access=yes to these gates based on survey and local knowlege. 
Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57962527
vanagaudi (2019-12-12 23:52:33+00:00): Thank you for your comment and corrections.
Supaplex (2018-01-20 00:35:56+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-24 22:36:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53221630 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fictional names in Singapore and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1601
user_5359 (2017-10-07 13:58:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you know the key address:housename? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 11:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52728321 or 52726410 where the changeset comment is: Revert several changesets whose sources are either stredax.dbnetze.com or Signalsoft.
Nakaner (2017-10-08 11:48:39+00:00): Hallo Dew442,

der ISR-Viewer (http://stredax.dbnetze.com/ISRViewer/public_html_de/svg/index.html) ist keine zulässige Quelle für OpenStreetMap, weshalb ich diesen und vergleichbare Änderungssätze soeben zurückgesetzt habe.

Das OpenStreetMap-Projekt legt großen Wert auf das Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte. Da uns DB Netz für die Nutzung dieser Daten keine Erlaubnis erteilt hat, müssen wir davon ausgehen, dass uns keine Erlaubnis vorliegt (ist bei allen geschützten Dokumenten per Default so). Du darfst bei den Beiträgen zu OpenStreetMap nur Datenquellen verwenden, deren Urheber du bist oder deren Rechteinhaber eine ausdrückliche Erlaubnis zur Übernahme erteilt hat. Das trifft auf eigene Beobachtungen vor Ort sowie die Luftbilder von Bing, ESRI, Mapbox und die zwei DigitalGlobe-Layer, die in JOSM verfügbar sind, zu.

Viele Grüße

Michael
literan (2017-10-08 11:22:32+00:00): Здравствуйте! странное получилось отношение https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7634229#map=14/55.4599/36.9485 - вот эти две области, что с ролью inner - разве они в территорию населенного пункта не входят? И на внешний контур роль outer забыли поставить.
Андрей Николаев (2017-10-09 00:49:52+00:00): literan, доброй ночи! Спасибо, что обратил внимание на ошибку. Поправил. Отношение с внутренних областей деревни удалил.
eggie (2017-10-07 14:14:47+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen.. Ik stuur je een welkomstmail zoals iedereen dat tegenwoordig krijgt met nuttige tips en links. Wellicht heb je er wat aan.
firefoxinspace (2018-12-09 15:08:40+00:00): Wäre es denkbar, die Innsbrucker Straße und Miesmacher Straße auf Primary hochzustufen, zumal sich an der Verkehrsbedeutung zwischen den beiden Kreuzungen nichts geändert hat und eine Lücke im überregionalen Straßennetz entstanden ist.
marcoSt (2018-12-10 18:30:31+00:00): Vorübergehend ja, solange die neue B15 im Westen Rosenheims nicht fertiggestellt ist. Danach wird, denke ich, auch der Rest heruntergestuft, so dass sich der Verkehr eh anders verteilt und die jetzige Bedeutung verschwindet. Dann müssten wir sowieso umtaggen.
firefoxinspace (2018-12-19 18:39:29+00:00): Ja richtig, das ist dann nur noch eine Frage der Zeit…
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 13:58:44+00:00): Goed bezig, toch heb ik een aanbeveling voor je.
De footways die je hebt ingebracht heb je aangebracht in 1 keer.
Dwz. dat op dit moment het troittoir op sommige stukken heen en terug loopt.
Dit is technisch onjuist.
Je zult het troittoir moeten onderbreken als je een knooppunt op een ander bestaand weggedeelte hebt gemaakt.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530795948
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9yw2vg8ys94n3w9/2017-10-07_15-57-09.jpg?raw=1

Mocht je hulp nodig hebben laat dit dan even weten.
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 14:01:40+00:00): Je hebt als het ware "het potloot niet van het papier gehaald tijdens het tekenen."
woodpeck (2017-10-10 11:47:12+00:00): Hallo Georg, hier hast Du abermals einem problematischen Datensatz, der eine werbliche "description" enthielt, ein "office=lawyer" hinzugefügt. Als Quelle hast Du "ESRI World Image" angegeben, obwohl das Gebäude darauf nicht ausreichnd zu sehen ist. Dass es hier zwei 100% deckungsgleiche Polygone gibt - eins mit building=yes und eins, dank Dir, mit office=lawyer - ist Dir auch nicht aufgefallen. Durch Deine gutgemeinte Arbeit verwischst Du die Spuren schlechten SEO-Mappings und machst es anderen schwieriger, diese Edits aufzuspüren und zu entfernen.  Ich hatte Dich neulich schonmal auf einen ähnlichen Fall aufmerksam gemacht. Vielleicht solltest Du einfach etwas weniger tun und dafür etwas gründlicher?
user_5359 (2017-10-10 15:26:54+00:00): Hallo, nur weil einer in der description ausschweifend wird, existiert noch lange keine Grund, die Angaben komplett zu löschen, zu mal kein weiterer Grund vorliegt (wie keine ähnliche Straße in der Nähe oder als Kirche gekennzeichnet). 

Korrektur der source Angabe Knowledge & esri world image (in this case without any influence)

Weiter möchte ich das nicht öffentlich kommentieren.
Hjart (2017-10-07 13:52:35+00:00): Vær opmærksom på at stierne skal kobles på Ishøj Bygade og ikke blot føres ud til kanten af skoven
wambacher (2017-12-23 12:41:35+00:00): Hi, 

Schön, dass du etwas verbesserst :)

aber: Teiche haben keine Adressen und erst recht nicht den Namen "Teich".

Gruss
walter
eggie (2017-10-07 14:23:04+00:00): Zo;n rotonde is best ingewikkeld als je net begtint met mappen. Er loopt bovendien een busroute overheen. Die heb je nu onderbroken. Verder krijgt een rotonde de tag. .. junction=roundabout mee. Kun je niet meer op de Laan van Bol'Es komen. Die route is nu afgesneden?
Ik kijk even naar de busroute.
eggie (2017-10-07 14:32:24+00:00): Het is wellicht verstandiger om eerst je werk bij de volkstuinen op te slaan en dan ergens anders weer te gaan editten. Nu is het lastig om zaken terug te draaien zonder je goede werk te behouden. Het is bij de rotonde een beetje een puzzel geworden hoe de busroutes liepen.
eggie (2017-10-07 14:33:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52708550#map=18/51.92819/4.36847&layers=T
Er lopen een aantal busroutes. Ik kijk nog even.
eggie (2017-10-07 14:49:53+00:00): Hier heb ik drie busroutes hersteld. Graag reactie zodat wij weten dat je op de hoogte bent van het gevaar om routes te onderbreken. Dit geldt ook voor fiets- en wandelroutes. 
Het fietspad heb ik weer verbindingsnodes gegeven met de rijbanen. Altijd een verbinding maken. 
In zo'n stedelijk gebied met veel infrastructuur is het gewoon lastig mappen. Vraag advies op het forum en/of laat iemand kijken. Reactie graag...
Hjart (2017-10-07 14:06:09+00:00): Det kan også være en god ide at være opmærksom på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch
c960657 (2017-10-07 14:11:10+00:00): Hmm, ja. Der er kompliceret.

I dette tilfælde må Sydbank så være name:Sydbank, branch:Ølgod, fordi der er tale om en afdeling af banken, mens Imerco skal være name:Imerco Ølgod, brand:Imerco, fordi det (så vidt jeg har forstået) er en kæde af selvstændige isenkræmmere.

Giver det mening?
Hjart (2017-10-07 14:18:04+00:00): Generelt anbefales det at name= kun indeholder det navn der står på butikkernes facade og generelt står der ikke f.eks. "SuperBrugsen Ølgod" eller "Fakta Ølgod" eller "Imerco Ølgod", så uanset hvad ville jeg bruge branch=Ølgod
c960657 (2017-10-07 14:42:30+00:00): Modtaget.

Lige akkurat Brugsen er begyndt at vise afdelingsnavnet på facadeskiltet (se fx http://www.cooltrade.dk/media/5475/super_brugsen_karup__1256.jpg), men det hører vist til undtagelsen.
Hjart (2017-10-07 14:45:55+00:00): Ok, det har jeg heller ikke set andre steder
Dino Michelini (2017-10-12 12:36:43+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che hai mappato alcuni  sentieri/carrarecce come highway=cycleway (piste ciclabili) dando dei nomi presumo di fantasia (imperatore, raccola, ecc.). Premetto che non frequento la zona da qualche anno ma mi sembra che la classificazione che hai operato sia impropriaperchè non mi risulta che esistano piste ciclabili con quei nomi. Ti invito a leggere la wiki di OSM per le ciclabili (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=cycleway), sentieri (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dpath e http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Hiking#Tipi_di_percorso).
Tyler_D (2017-10-12 16:22:37+00:00): Ciao, si tratta di trail da enduro ricavati per le MTB da una A.S.D. locale e che hanno battezzato così i percorsi. Mi sono limitato ad estendere uno solo dei percorsi  "ripetitori" che era incompleto ma già catalogato come ciclabile insieme agli altri ("razzola", "rotella", "granata", "imperatore").
zstadler (2017-12-03 16:34:40+00:00): Hello,
In this edit, you have added a gate http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5153636964, but it is not connected to the nearby road.
As a result, it is not applied to the road.
YGMZ (2017-12-05 06:11:07+00:00): corrected
mueschel (2017-10-11 09:41:57+00:00): Hi,
du hast hier 'surface' entfernt und durch "descriptio1 	Lärmschutzwand" ersetzt:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25465819
War das ein Versehen?
Gruss, Jan
bigbug21 (2017-10-11 20:33:14+00:00): Ja, das war es. Danke für den Tipp.
trigpoint (2017-10-08 17:01:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Please do not mistag things, this is described as a clinic so it should not be mapped as a hospital as that is extremely misleading for other map users.
Please use amenity=clinic, you may need to use a proper OSM editor such as iD to change this.
CathyH2808 (2017-10-09 09:25:58+00:00): I didn't deliberately mislead anyone. You are right - this is a clinic NOT a hospital but "hospital" was the closest category I could choose to the medical context of the business. If you could explain how I can accurately describe/amend the details, I would be happy to oblige.
trigpoint (2017-10-08 17:01:43+00:00): In what way is Yew Tree House an attraction?
CathyH2808 (2017-10-09 09:21:05+00:00): Only In the same way as other houses on the street. They are listed (e.g. Jessamine Cottage). Why is this a problem? It helps visitors to the village know exactly where they are.
CathyH2808 (2017-10-09 09:22:21+00:00): If you wish to remove this listing, I will feel disappointed but won't argue about it.
trigpoint (2017-10-09 09:26:44+00:00): There is no need to remove it. The name should be moved to addr:housename field and tourism=attraction should be removed as it is not somewhere tourists would visit.

Cheers Phil
CathyH2808 (2017-10-09 09:43:41+00:00): Phil
I am not techy(!) You may have already gathered this. I can't seem to amend the category or know how to follow your instructions (though I am happy to do so!)
Please can you explain to a numpty exactly how & what changes I need to make & when I get another break from work I will action them. Thanks.
freebeer (2017-10-09 16:53:56+00:00): Hi Cathy,
I see that user SK53 has corrected this.
What Phil was referring to is what I see far too often in english-speaking countries where the app, maps.me, is in use.
That is, far too many items are given a default to be a tourist attraction.
In other-language countries, other defaults appear far too often where they have no place, like alpine huts in coastal cities near the equator -- I have been trying to clean up after some of the damage this app has spammed.
I suspect that the proper way to repair this cannot be done with maps.me, but by use of a more advanced beginner editor on the OSM website, which will allow you to do many things not possible from the maps.me app.
I have never used the app, nor, having suffered through the damage it's done, do I have any interest, so what I write here is largely conjecture.
I hope I have explained a little bit about what is the issue.
And thanks to the other user, you need to do nothing more here!
CathyH2808 (2017-10-10 12:29:10+00:00): Thank you so much for your comments. Very useful! Won't touch Maps.me again though in case I get it wrong again! You're a star! 👍
SK53 (2017-10-11 13:46:37+00:00): Forgot to mention I'd changed it! From aerial imagery it looks as if the house is a slightly different shape from that shown.

With maps.me you can also add a note which puts a marker on the map saying something like "Yew Tree House".

Someday I'll do more mapping in Hickling, last time I only added housenumbers on Harles Acres.
mavl (2017-10-07 16:53:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 47409681, 47410668, 47411141, 47411345, 47411416, 47411462, 47411602, 47411821, 47412452, 47413086, 47413155, 47437516, 47437532, 47437751, 47437874, 47440085, 47440136, 47441457, 47443124, 47443441, 47502189, 47502229, 47502255, 47502366, 47502409, 47503463, 47503882, 47503950, 47504082, 47504424, 47504495, 47504519, 47504718, 47505094, 47506110, 47506896, 47508361, 47527620, 47528193.
GerdP (2017-10-19 08:49:02+00:00): Hi!
Please review, I fear you accidentially moved a part of a major road by > 70m, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4778108925
MKnight (2017-10-07 20:36:10+00:00): some parts of this CS was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52717189
eggie (2017-10-07 15:35:36+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-10-07 15:38:03+00:00): Je tekent hier een huis over een bestaande woning. Dat is niet de bedoeling. Wat is je bedoeling precies. Ik draai je bijdrage terug.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
eggie (2017-10-07 15:39:48+00:00): reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52710764
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 15:57:46+00:00): nette correctie!
eggie (2017-10-07 17:12:51+00:00): changeset op forum geplaatst op vezoek om even te checken
eggie (2017-10-07 17:53:22+00:00): Volg het draadje even: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=667189#p667189
IIVQ (2017-10-13 20:22:47+00:00): I have reverted the changeset. The idea was nice, but it's tagging for the router. A proper router wouldn't use the route A2->A2 due to the turn restriction, and even a bad router is unlikely to send you this way as it's longer than the preferred route.
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 16:04:04+00:00): Hou rekening met [one feature one element] (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
Er zijn nu 2 tags die amenity=place_of_worship hebben op 1 element.
In dit geval kun je de "kerk" tags beter naar de building=* contour plaatsen.
Probeer zo compleet mogelijk te taggen.
De kerk mist nu nog een aantal waardevolle eigenschappen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=place_of_worship
zoals
denomination=*
building=church
website=*
.
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
Commodoortje (2017-10-07 16:07:15+00:00): ID zet automatisch footway=sidewalk erbij. In werkelijkheid is er geen sidewalk, en is een bug in ID. Wil je hier in de toekomst proberen rekening mee te houden en deze tag verwijderen? Ik heb de tag inmiddels verwijderd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk
jwmj4j (2017-10-07 16:40:47+00:00): dank je voor de review en hulp
GerdP (2017-10-08 09:42:19+00:00): Hi!
I fixed a typo highway="te]"
on three ways. I assume you meant tertiary, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52726073
juhanjuku (2017-10-09 12:48:36+00:00): Can you please explain why you changed highway classification from secondary to primary for Rapla — Järvakandi — Kergu?
Jay May (2017-10-10 05:45:28+00:00): Hello. Because I drove there and it is an alternative route to the Via Baltica, just like the road through Lihula. Why do you ask? Do you think it is wrong?
juhanjuku (2017-10-10 06:23:46+00:00): Estonian OSM community has agreed higways classifications. Primary are highways connecting big citys.
https://et.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C3%B5himaantee.
Please don't change them.

Also, please don't use Bing aerial images for Estonia because they have big shift. Instead you can use Maaamet images which are very good and precise.
Jay May (2017-10-10 07:05:33+00:00): Hi again
I understood that, which is why I changed the classification. However, I understand what you mean: if you take the road stretches I changed separately, for sure they are not roads connecting main cities. However, I changed that because I have a vistion of routes as a whole. I think it is a matter of discussing it between us. I was advised to take this route by an Estonian friend, and so I did. I think it is quite a good alternative to the Via Baltica or the road through Lihula. How do you think?

I noticed some people (ex.: in Lithuania) prefer sticking to the theory rather than favorizing practice, which IMHO opinion is wrong. When you see, for instance, Joniškis (Northern Lithuania http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/56.2281/23.5950). The A12 road (which according to the LT classification is a main road) leads through the city center. However, the Western bypass (road 210) is classified only as primary. If I followed my OSM-based GPS, I would drive right through the city center, which means: loss of time, more pollution. If you take the Western bypass by car, it is much quicker. Hence, I would classify the 210 road as the main on and the A12 road as primary or secondary on that specific stretch. Many times (LT, BY, etc.) countries build new roads, bypasses, etc. but forget to change the official classification and numbers of old roads, which leads to absurd situations when GPS-es lead transiting drivers right through city centers. In Estonia, I noticed it was the same with the Rapla bypass, which was classified lower than the N/S road leading right through the Rapla city center.
juhanjuku (2017-10-10 07:14:14+00:00): It has been discussion in local OSM forum and about roads classification in Estonia and agreed to stick to wiki definition. It was common decision, so please don't change them.
I reverted your changes.
juhanjuku (2017-10-10 07:16:38+00:00): Official classification from Estonian authorities:
https://www.mnt.ee/et/tee/eesti-teedevork
Jay May (2017-10-10 08:37:36+00:00): What about the Western Rapla bypass?
Where is that local agreement? Not that I want to discuss the reverting of all this stretch, but I would like at least the town bypasses to be signed higher than parallel roads leading through city centers
P.S: thanks a lot for your suggestion about maaamet.
juhanjuku (2017-10-10 13:12:47+00:00): Discussion about road classes was in local OSM forum.
In Estonia we have permission from Maaamet to use state official data. Roads classification around Rapla you can see here:
http://xgis.maaamet.ee/xGIS/XGis?app_id=UU75&user_id=at&bbox=540882.217420021,6537584.08015333,551605.020142087,6544685.58546487&LANG=1
I can't see good reason to use different classification in OSM.
majid1359 (2017-10-07 16:01:39+00:00): دو تا ادرس اشتباه بود یکی پاک شد
majid1359 (2017-10-07 16:04:14+00:00): مکان اشتباه بود پاک شد
mavl (2017-10-08 15:46:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Тег shop_1=car_parts никто не поймёт (люди ещё могут догадаться, но компьютеры не поймут точно). Лучше всего добавить поблизости ещё одну точку интереса с тегом shop
Julien_N (2017-10-08 09:52:49+00:00): Attention 2x le N° 20 de la Place de l'Eglise
roptat (2017-10-08 11:54:27+00:00): corrigé, merci :)
eggie (2017-10-07 17:54:27+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-10-07 17:57:43+00:00): Wellicht kun je nog de naam erbij zetten. name=..... ?
Moiman (2017-10-08 13:40:36+00:00): Way 530843618 jäi ilman tageja. Näyttää rakennukselta.
moli2378 (2017-10-07 16:42:51+00:00): added waste basket post
PT-53 (2017-10-08 06:45:40+00:00): Hallo eastsideboys01,
Du hast an diesem Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527906362 u.a.name=Wohnhaus eingetragen. Wohnhaus ist aber kein Eigennamen. Ich habe diesen Eintrag daher wieder gelöscht.
Grüße
B1000 (2017-10-07 20:32:04+00:00): Tu as eu un bug de piscine au 31 rue du Noyer je crois ^^
4004 (2017-10-08 20:37:49+00:00): ну не знаете вы бел эквивалента, ну можно было бы хотя бы переводчиком перевести, чего сразу сносить тег
Аndrey (2017-10-09 06:44:00+00:00): Благодарю за замечание, в течение дня исправлю.
Хорошо хоть, что таким запросом http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sdw подобные остановки можно быстро найти.
4004 (2017-10-09 06:54:05+00:00): Следком я уже поправил, остальное не смотрел. 
Оверпасс, конечно, полезен, но учитывая, как остро сейчас стоит языковой вопрос в местном сообществе, лучше просто сразу делать правильно. 
Спасибо за понимание
jaap de vries (2017-10-10 11:26:46+00:00): Je hebt een opmerking van Rowan opgelost, hij is inmiddels gestopt. Je hebt een poi supermarkt toegevoegd maar geen adres toegevoegd, weet je die wel?
fietswim (2017-10-10 14:12:12+00:00): Het adres is Europaplein 37
jaap de vries (2017-10-11 09:27:15+00:00): aha, is het dan niet handig om deze dan op adres Europaplein 37 te zetten?
moli2378 (2017-10-07 17:31:03+00:00): This is not street lamp post.
This is waste basket post
sperlingskauz (2017-11-26 20:53:49+00:00): Hi vibrog,

you used the tag natural=termite_mound. Are there really termite mounds in Norway? Or did you mean natural=anthill?

Regards,
sperlingskauz

Regards,
sperlingskauz
vibrog (2017-11-27 18:56:48+00:00): I was unsure what to use at the time. I'm happy to change those I've tagged to anthill. Thanks for pointing this out. /Vidar
sperlingskauz (2017-12-03 19:40:31+00:00): Hi Vidar,

for your information: The wiki pages for termite_mound and anthill are now created. There are currently 49 taggings termite_mound in Europe.

Regards, 
Uta
moli2378 (2017-10-07 17:49:27+00:00): this is street-lamp post
AndriesWijma (2017-10-08 10:56:12+00:00): Er is hier iets misgegaan. De adresnode van Eyssemawei 15 is verplaatst naar een plek tussen de woningen Tsjerkestrjitte 44 en 46. Je kunt dit herstellen door de node weer terug op de woning aan de Eyssemawei te slepen.
FredrikLindseth (2017-10-08 09:32:00+00:00): Hi Karta,
You should write some changeset comments so its easy for other mappers to see what you did where. 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for inspiration :-)
Sanniu (2017-10-10 05:53:03+00:00): You have added many empty point in this edit. Can you fix them?
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-11 10:22:55+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52819330
mavl (2017-10-10 14:35:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2017-10-10 14:35:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
mavl (2017-10-10 14:35:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.