piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2022-04-03 02:21:53+00:00): Nebraska covers all of continental US?🤨
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
4004 (2022-04-09 22:59:59+00:00): добавили разворот? в феврале вроде не было https://autogrodno.by/images/2022/02/rumlevskij-most-bez-ludej-18.jpg
whb (2022-04-13 13:06:43+00:00): Guten Tag,

die der Straße zugewandten Wände der Gebäude mit der Hausnummern 3 und 5 sind etwa doppelt so lang wie in diesem Änderungssatz erfasst. Die  östlichen Dachhälften liegen auf den meisten Luftbildern im Schatten und sind deshalb evtl. nicht richtig zu erkennen. Ich habe die Gebäude verbessert.

Viele Grüße
whb
steffen_hd (2022-04-13 16:25:52+00:00): Vielen Dank fuers Verbessern. Es kann sein, dass ich in diesem Fall die Laenge dieser Haeuserwaende uebernommen habe. Meistens aendere ich die Umrisse der Haeuser nur, wenn sie nicht stimmen (z.B. wenn die Seitenverhaeltnisse nicht stimmen). Viele Gruesse - s.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
gscscnd (2022-04-03 09:47:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216512543 — lanes nie pasuje do lanes:forward i lanes:backward.
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-04-03 10:08:26+00:00): Dzięki. Skorygowałem.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SekeRob (2022-04-02 21:05:05+00:00): Why o Why, 'highway construction' and then you do a O0 Change bare rock role for i to inner ;to shop in Germany and the Aswam Dam in Egypt in the same edit set. All mapper inbetween get to see this for days in their local change set history. Pretty please, edit local, save local, move to the next local, edit, save, move to the next local and so on and so on and only the local we see the edit listed.

MTIA from Italy.
ivanatora (2022-04-03 14:12:02+00:00): +1 for SekeRob
Please, commit in a more place-sensitive matter.
Rainero (2022-04-03 20:46:41+00:00): Hallo Teddy73,  
welches ist denn der richtige Name? an der Straße steht name=Burgstraße, an den Adressen addr:street=Burgweg, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1047481033

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Teddy73 (2022-04-03 22:10:03+00:00): Hi Rainer, Burgstraße ist richtig. Den Burgweg gibts nur in Ruthweiler auf der anderen Bergseite. Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe die Adressen bereits korrigiert. VG Teddy
Allison P (2022-04-03 03:12:36+00:00): The suffix needs to be expanded for Cubola.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-04-02 20:07:48+00:00): Dag Liam  Je vraagt feedback..
water=drain is een verharde bodem of is soms een buis van beton of half open. Dus eigenlijk hier niet van toepassing. Beter dus ditch gebruiken. 

Meestal wordt voor sloot waterway=ditch gebruikt.
De stroomrichting dan altijd weer richting gemaal. 

Bij een duiker wordt dan weer wel vaak drain gebruikt. Dat water heeft wellicht een verbinding met de andere kant van de N417 dmv een duiker
Als het een buis is dan
waterway=drain
tunnel=culvert
layer=-1

Gr eggie
eggie (2022-04-02 20:09:15+00:00): Van het vlak heb ik sloot weer even omgezet naar ditch.. het lijnelement ook. 
Er zijn over sloten al diverse discussies gevoerd op het forum. Je zou even kunnen googelen.
startzz (2022-04-24 04:47:34+00:00): Está Correto , Só falta a demarcação do Estado Palestino com um todo.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
Animyos Fox (2022-04-02 19:57:13+00:00): Additional source: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2864625
(but created by myself, so it's verified on site anyway)
jpennycook (2022-04-02 20:41:14+00:00): Note - I've not used OSMUK Cadastral Parcels, and most of the changes aren't on aerial imagery anyway, so alignment may not be great.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-04-03 23:53:55+00:00): Hi bambi25661,

Please be more careful with the placement and shapes of the features you are adding to OSM. 

I've left a couple of comments on various changes you've made in the past weeks because of similar issues.

In this case, you've placed this church adjacent to where it actually is, and you have marked the building as an odd shape. Previously, you have added a park on the wrong side of the road, and in another case, you added features as a completely incorrect shape so that they were intersecting buildings and roads.

In all. this means that someone will have to come through and fix (or even remove) a lot of your additions.

If you are having trouble using the editors or accessing imagery, please feel free to reply and I'll do what I can to help you out.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
mariotomo (2022-04-02 22:57:39+00:00): :+1: :-)
eggie (2022-04-02 20:22:17+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119246229

Yep ..  dat was 'm
gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-04-02 20:28:56+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me duidelijk..  correct dus
eggie
Himké (2022-04-02 21:11:23+00:00): deleted non-existent or demolished features
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
EricTheLinguist (2022-04-10 23:23:55+00:00): This is a pedestrian area. Conversion to a path is not ideal and causes errors in navigation.  See documentation at the link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guidelines_for_pedestrian_navigation
hatul (2022-04-19 18:03:08+00:00): אם אין כלום אז אין טעם להשאיר נקודה ולכן מחקתי אותה.
בכל מקרה התיוג הנכון לא היה אטרקציה.
zstadler (2023-08-09 07:15:23+00:00): Hello Yuval,

It looks like the Hashmonaim Crossing relation 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13997043

you added in this edit was later broken by updates to the parking lot.

Could you please look into this?

Thanks,
Zeev
literan (2022-04-03 10:46:20+00:00): это не названия
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
marczoutendijk (2022-04-06 07:14:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5887
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
ChillyDL (2022-04-04 22:16:05+00:00): Hallo LightSprit,
du hast hier ein paar archäologische Fundorte mit "tourism=attraction" und gleichzeitig mit "access=no" getaggt. Das scheint nicht zusammenzupassen, Touristenattraktionen, die man gar nicht betreten darf - wie ist das denn?
LightSpirit (2022-04-05 02:46:09+00:00): Die Hügelgräber stehen unter Denkmalschutz, deswegen darf man sie nicht betreten (heritage=yes). Sie sind meistens so um die 2000 Jahre alt, würde man die Hügelgräber betreten, würden sie abgetragen mit der Zeit, einige unter ihnen sind schon so flach, das man sie nicht mehr erkennen kann. Man kann sie bewundern, wenn man daneben steht oder auch von der Ferne.

Liebe Grüße
Oliver (LightSpirit)
Dimitar155 (2022-04-03 05:46:46+00:00): След като веднъж е сложен access=no, няма нужда да се добавят забраните за пешеходци, автомобили, каруци и колела. access се прилага автоматично за всичките.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
xtd (2024-06-30 20:49:07+00:00): Olá. Não sei se ainda faz dessa forma, pois são revisões de dois anos atrás, mas, por favor, tente usar Relações em vez de grudar vias fechadas nesses casos e principalmente convém evitar deixar linhas sobrepostas, compartilhando pontos, principalmente com vias. Isso atrapalha bastante. Aos poucos vamos aprendendo. Gracias pel empenho.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
tux67 (2022-04-04 08:06:35+00:00): Hallo Daniel Weuthen,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Kleiner Hinweis, wenn du Wege aufsplittest solltest du darauf achten daß vorhandene Relationen vorher heruntergeladen wurden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=740207#p740207

Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119247314
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-05 20:41:57+00:00): Why the building over the parking lot?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-03 05:09:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you know the key owner ( see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:owner)?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.