piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-11-01 14:52:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Oke. geef aan wat je toevoegt. 
Je kun ook een landuse = grass intekeken en de leisure=playground op een node zetten.
MVG,
Eggie
dijkmeneer (2019-11-01 15:12:47+00:00): is het zo goed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76502649

Mvg,
Dijkmeneer
eggie (2019-11-01 14:54:17+00:00): Zie feedback eerste changeset. 
grasveldje en daarin op de node de playground
eggie (2019-11-01 15:06:52+00:00): Alle gebouwen zijn import vanuit het Kadaster. Niet kijken naar de dakranden. Dat is altijd fout. Luchtfoto's vertekenen.
Svp Niets aan gebouwen veranderen.
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-01 15:16:08+00:00): reverted by changeset #76502862
eggie (2019-11-01 15:17:10+00:00): De gebouwen heb ik hersteld.
SHARCRASH (2019-11-01 14:56:12+00:00): + tag additions/corrections
eggie (2019-11-01 15:08:57+00:00): Svp niet zomaar de edist avnandere mapper veranderen. een pitch kun je toevoegen op het grasveld zelf. Het hele gebied zalk niet de pitch zijn.
eggie (2019-11-01 15:21:30+00:00): Ik zie geen aparte velden.. dus kan wel op deze manier.
Eggie
aceman444 (2020-09-05 20:21:03+00:00): Zdravim, preco ta zmena cesty cez pumpu zo service na residential?
eggie (2019-11-01 15:37:22+00:00): Hi. The streetname is not Zainab House
We don't tag streetnames at buildings. 
I shall remove your contribution.
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-01 15:39:28+00:00): reverted by changeset #76503962
eggie (2019-11-01 15:09:36+00:00): Het is al eerder gevraagd.. NIETS aan gebouwen veranderen. Dat is niet correct.
eggie (2019-11-01 15:15:01+00:00): reverted by changeset  #76502805
Discostu36 (2019-11-02 21:20:08+00:00): Der etablierte Tag ist shop=dry_cleaning
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76502452
eggie (2019-11-01 15:32:47+00:00): Oke.. maar nu heb je een lijn zonder tag highway=
Wanneer er bv een olifantenpaadje is dan tag je
highway=path
path=desire

Kijk je nog even?
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-11-01 16:05:42+00:00): olifantenpaadje aangepast... 
een lege lijn zonder highwaytag  heeft geen zin.
gpserror (2019-11-04 02:20:27+00:00): Might be better to use "Parking Aisle" instead of "Service Road" where the road doesn't really lead anywhere except to a row of parking spots, at least that's what I'd do.
patadivy (2019-11-04 09:52:03+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under changeset #76580345 as per your comment. I'll ensure to recheck the edits before uploading changes hereafter. Regards,
patadivy.
gpserror (2019-11-04 19:19:48+00:00): Cool, thanks for updating.  I just think it looks a bit better when roads that aren't used for getting from point A to point B (like if A or B is just a one car parking spot) should be a thin road that can be easily dropped when zoomed out without needing some algorithm to guess.
patadivy (2019-11-05 13:51:10+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion, this completely make sense. We will ensure to follow your suggestion.
Regards,
patadivy.
freebeer (2019-11-10 11:33:07+00:00): moin gpserror,

i find your interpretation of service v. parking aisle interesting, where you would use service to get from point a to b.

i've used parking aisle for sections of service drives where at any point one can turn off into a parking spot, even if it is possible to pass through the car park without parking, to get from point a to point b.

that is, in the absence of mapped parking areas like here (which seems depressingly common, where service drives have been added without bothering to add an area to show the extent of the car park), i would specifically use parking aisle to tell a navigator that in theory one should be able to pull off along that line and park, which somehow i think i explained already before being interrupted half an hour ago.  but also that it could be possible to traverse that section in order to arrive elsewhere.

if that makes sense.  anyway, i wanted to explain how i've mapped car parks, where a service drive designation alternates with parking aisle and back, often repeatedly.

whatever.
gpserror (2019-11-12 17:20:11+00:00): I guess my main reason for making the distinction is I'd like the map to stand on its own if suddenly all the parking aisles were deleted from the map.  What troubles me is there would be a lot of dangling roads now if parking aisles were removed, and IMHO this should not be the case!  The main reason why I've been editing OSM is for trying to get maps working on standalone devices and one of the "optimizations" I've wanted is to keep file sizes small - and these parking aisles is one thing that seemed like a good compromise, except when it causes dangling roads when they get removed.   I suspect an algorithm could be made to remove some of these too, but I figured it'd look better anyway if "minor" roads like parking aisles were drawn thinner.
freebeer (2019-11-14 02:44:04+00:00): ciao gpserror,

i suspect that i view parking aisles as an enhancement on the service drive concept, with the additional info that in theory it would be possible to turn off into a parking space pretty much anywhere, taking into account granularity, but then with facepalm moments of the last week or two i suppose that i should consider the marked parking spaces advisory and in reality an anything-goes philosophy will better match the reality that i've facepalmed repeatedly.

satire meets real life.  at least i've never failed to find the parked fiat panda taking up three normal parking spaces.

i see parking aisles here as not a means to get from point a to b, while in other layouts where parking exists to the side, i can see the primary/secondary function would be to get to point b.

i guess it's like private residential driveways.  i suspect there is a USian language bias that uses the term driveway to refer to what osm maps as service drives, but i also interpret a private driveway to be available to traffic between a pavement (sidewalk) that pedestrians and underage cyclists are required to use, and the street accompanying, to a pavement reached by another private driveway.  or a path the driveway connects with.  to split a driveway into public-for-allowed-transport sections and private/destination to the actual home seems pointless in most cases and additional mapping work, the default should be off-limits unless you fall into a category that puts it on-limits.

i'm probably not expressing meself well.  for your use case, i'm not sure if you can algorithmically lose parking aisles without losing access to the building itself, and i agree, a lot of what are parking aisles by my definition are also routes to get to point b.

to take yesterday's real world example, i wasted a large part of the day walking in one direction and ending up on what i would map as a private driveway, meself getting increasingly slower as it became clear i would not be able to reach the goal i'd not researched ahead of time, without treading on private property that is a relatively new concept to me the last month.  as i found after-the-fact, the bing clarity imagery shows nowt in the part i strode in confidence, while the other imageries are offset from the mapped data so i'm unsure how to map reality as i didn't pack a gps or even view the map ahead of time.

why am i writing this drivel?  obviously because i want to get the fact across i'm totally incompetent to get from point a to b.

and i can't navigate meself out of a wet paper bag to do the shopping i wanted.
eggie (2019-11-01 15:13:36+00:00): Oke..Even niet mappen. Ik draai wat terug bij de school en het gebouw
eggie (2019-11-01 15:18:58+00:00): Prima. Nog wel even van het vlak afhalen playground house en surface=grass Dat staat al op de node.
Je kunt weer mappen. Svp niet aan gebouwen..
Succes,
Eggie
dijkmeneer (2019-11-01 15:23:45+00:00): bedankt, sorry dat ik uw berichten zo laat leeste 

mvg-
dijkmeneer
eggie (2019-11-01 15:29:14+00:00): No hard feelings.. In het begin worden de edits van starters gevolgd. Juist om te helpen. 
Eggie
nw520 (2020-05-02 14:33:35+00:00): Hallo tower27,
du hast beim Saarbasar bei den Fußwegen im Gebäude mehrere highway=crossing angelegt. Hast du diese interpoliert? Denn der Fußgängerweg ist im Erdgeschoss, während die Straßen in oberen Geschossen sind.
Ich habe mal die Kreuzungen wieder gelöscht, falls ich falsch liege, antworte bitte und fühl dich gerne so die Kreuzungen wieder anzulegen.
ndm (2019-11-01 23:04:11+00:00): You've marked footpaths as access=no over the Old Market roundabout -- if that's only temporary could you possibly add a note to that effect -- so it gets flagged up to be remapped in the future.
eggie (2019-11-01 15:44:08+00:00): Oke.. Maar dit valt dus onder veranderen van de tags van andere mappers. In dit geval van DvdHoven 
Hij is de specialist in fietspaden en een lokale mapper in je buurt. Overleg eerst met hem voordat je een pad veranderd in een fietspad. 
iets is alleen een fietspad als er een bord G13, G11 G12a staat. Wanneer dat bord er nu wel staat neem je contact op met Dvdhoven en bericht je dat je zijn edits gaat aanpassen.
Welk bord staat er vooraan?

Ik draai voorlopig  deze verandering weer even terug. Beperk je eerst tot bv toevoegen van bv een nieuw paadje of een bankje of picnicsite/tafel. 
eggie
eggie (2019-11-01 15:55:26+00:00): reverted by changeset #76504524
dijkmeneer (2019-11-01 15:59:00+00:00): oké
dvdhoven (2019-11-01 16:01:24+00:00): Nee, dit zijn definitief geen fietspaden!!!!
Ik gebruik zo ook heel vaak. Het zijn betonpaden, waarop - kort na de aanleg - witte fietssymblen waren geplakt. Die zijn inmiddels weg gesleten. 
Maar de paden hebben geen G bord en daarmee zijn ze path en geen cycleway.
Dat de fietsers er overheen mogen blijkt uit bicycle=yes
Er staat dus geen enkel bord, geen G07 en ook geen G11, G12a of G13.
dijkmeneer (2019-11-02 11:17:10+00:00): bedankt!
Vinber (2019-11-03 09:26:23+00:00): Bonjour, et merci pour vos précisions. Cependant, vous avez supprimé des bâtiments pour les remplacer par des versions moins précises, vous avez parfois supprimé le building=yes pour le remplacer par building=Cabinet_de_masseur_Kinésithérapeuthe (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109940519#map=19/44.86280/-0.72851).

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=76503638

Vous avez tendance à décrire dans le nom la fonction (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741020162).

N'hésitez pas à vous aider du wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:B%C3%A2timents

Et continuez à cartographier !
Frans S (2019-11-01 16:06:38+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here. you mapped quite a lot of buildings. Great !
a request. 
Please be more accurate in your mappings,
You tend to map buildings often bigger than the image shows. 
Thanks and keep mapping
eggie (2019-11-01 15:45:51+00:00): Welk bord staat hier?. Bij geen bord is iets een highway=path De voorgaande mapper is Dvdhoven. Hij is hier lokale mapper.
Eerst overleggen.
eggie (2019-11-01 15:54:33+00:00): reverted by changeset #76504491
Frans S (2019-11-02 13:55:41+00:00): Hello Gorka
Thanks for mapping in this area
I am reviewing mappings and noticed to my surprise that you hardly squared your mappings properly. From the 171 buildings you mapped here were 170 not squared according to my JOSM validating tool for finding non squared buildings.  When you do this freehanded they were rather good, however the aim is to do it just good.
Please use the Q key in IDeditor to square your mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping. 
ps. you map quite a lot. Never thought about working in JOSM ? More plug in's to work faster and more precise
ChehrehBargi (2019-11-06 09:18:31+00:00): با سلام 
جناب جلیلی؛ انتهای مسیرها به وسیله دایره گردش نباید باشند. این تگ معمولا برای انتهای خیابان ها و یا کوچه هایی استفاده می شود که محوطه بزرگی مخصوص دور زدن برای آنها در نظر گرفته شده.
eggie (2019-11-01 15:58:47+00:00): Yep... oke. access=yes hoeft trouwens ook niet, maar kwaad kan het niet.
De brug-en fietspaden edits heb ik teruggedraaid. Het zijn edits van een zeer ervaren lokale  mapper. Mocht er een bord fietspad zijn gekomen laat het weten en zeker aan de lokale mapper.
Gr eggie
dijkmeneer (2019-11-01 16:01:46+00:00): Bedankt!

Mvg
Dijkmeneer
km2bp (2019-11-24 21:36:29+00:00): Nastawnia nie tak powinna wyglądać coś jest nie tak bo nie wyświetla się na mapie
maraf24 (2019-11-01 18:10:31+00:00): Wycofane.
aseerel4c26 (2019-11-01 16:40:35+00:00): Der Spielplatz ist nun doppelt. BItte antworte!
aseerel4c26 (2019-11-02 15:57:32+00:00): Danke für's Korrigieren und die Antwort! :)
Frans S (2019-11-02 13:06:27+00:00): Hello Rhea Thanks for mapping on this project
A request. The instructions ask to map from the Bing Imagery which is rather old. On this place taken between 2009 and 2016, 
since then many buildings are new erected and others modified. 
On the Maxar imagery which is more recent You will find many new and modified buildings. 
If you can, please use the Maxar imagery after correcting the offset to Bing.
Thanks and keep mapping
Frans
gendy54 (2019-12-09 22:57:55+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'ajout, mais ce que vous avez fait ne sert à rien car vous avez oublié le principal. Voit ici pour comprendre:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.
J'ai corrigé. Je vous laisse aller voir
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76505400
lyctkel (2022-06-26 18:48:30+00:00): Hi Bratananio,
did you mean an outdoor seating area or a terraced house at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741033771?
Regards,
lyctkel
Bratananio (2022-06-27 15:41:12+00:00): Hi lyctkel,

I just answered by e-mail. It is a free part , and owned by s.o.. It is more or less like a terrace but not to sit outside.
Regards
B.
lyctkel (2022-06-27 17:06:47+00:00): Hi Bratanio,
to be honest, I have no idea what should be tagged here. I'll leave a fixm tag and link to the changeset comments. Maybe someone has a better idea what should tagged here. 
Regards,
lyctkel
archie (2019-11-01 17:19:05+00:00): Varför ändrar du ändrar du kommungränsen mellan Tranemo- och Svenljunga kommun? Är du säker att detta är rätt?
Knugge (2019-11-01 20:22:22+00:00): komungränsern löper utmed vår mark och jag såg att den gick rakt över så jag justerade den i enlighet med lantmäteriets gräns.
archie (2019-11-01 23:13:07+00:00): Ok, jag tyckte att det var rätt stor skillnad mellan gamla förloppet och det nya. Ville bara kolla så att det inte var något oavsiktligt fel. Tack!
archie (2019-11-02 07:01:21+00:00): Du har ju helt rätt! Jag har filtret i JOSM aktiv på "boundary". Därför såg jag inte förrän nu.
MKnight (2020-11-01 21:33:29+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier ein fixme gesetzt.
Ich habe da jetzt schon paarmal nach Quellen gesucht und bin gerade auf dem PLZ-Server der Post darauf gestossen, dass es DORT die Strasse als Adresse gibt. 
Ausgeschildert ist diese vor Ort allerdings nicht.
ilmlaender (2020-11-02 07:55:07+00:00): Tja, ich erinnere die Überlegungen vom Zeitpunkt des "fixme" nicht mehr, aber dass da kein Straßennamensschild "Schloss Tiefurt" zu finden ist, überrascht mich nicht. Aus http://www.geoproxy.geoportal-th.de/geoclient/ erfährt man, dass dieser Name als Adresse nur für die Hausnummer 1 in Gebrauch ist: das ist das Schloßgebäude. Die Hauptstr. 14 finden wir dort, wo in der Karte die "Alte Remise" verzeichnet ist.
ilmlaender (2020-11-02 08:59:44+00:00): Eine weitere verläßliche Quelle für lokale Adressdaten ist: 
https://stadtplan.weimar.de/portalserver/#/portal/weimar 
Und - nicht zufällig - bestätigt sie, was ich bereits ermittelt hatte.
josmougn (2020-01-07 23:04:10+00:00): bonjour
la combinaison residential=garden est curieuse et n'est pas documentée.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544359846
Merci de modifier ces attributs
cordialement, José
Frans S (2019-11-06 11:36:51+00:00): Hello John,
Thanks for mapping here.
a request. Please use the MAXAR std Imagery. This is required in the instructions and much more recent than the Bing  your used.
Best regards
SK53 (2019-12-14 09:07:09+00:00): Hi, 

I'd like to know why you decided to re-classify Hindhay Lane. From your profile you appear to be based in Kansas rather than Maidenhead, and therefore I doubt it you truly know the place.

This has always been a track. Since the mid-2000s it (and Malders Lane) were re-classified as Restricted Byways because they were appearing on SatNavs and cars were using them as rat runs. Motor vehicles (other than those belonging to the farmer/landowner) are prohibited. 

I have changed it back to a track.

Yours,

Jerry aka SK53
Frans S (2019-11-14 16:30:30+00:00): Hello Kli_lyft. Thanks for mapping on this project.
You mapped quite a lot of buildings, but ...
From the wrong Imagery (BING) Did you not read the instructions of selecting the Maxar std imagery? Much more recent and shows newer buildings as well.
Please read the instructions next mappings.

Best regards and keep mapping
KelvinKLi (2019-11-14 23:30:22+00:00): Hello Frans S,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  It was not my intention to use the wrong imagery. The map has been updated as requested per changeset #77095132.  Please feel free to take a look.  I appreciate your help and will do more to make sure to avoid these situations in the future.
Thank you,
Kelvin
iWowik (2020-01-19 11:31:25+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики и вносите адресную информацию.

Обычно номера домов не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а где вы их берете?
Evgesha39 (2020-01-20 10:31:05+00:00): спрашиваю
iWowik (2020-01-25 12:54:39+00:00): Спасибо за развернутый ответ.

За последние 3 месяца 2019 года вы внесли 10487 номеров домов в двух субъектах Федерации.

3000 домиков в день, это 100 домиков в день. Если чить больше, чем по минуте на опрос, то около двух часов ежедневных опросов.
Но мне почему-то кажется, что вы слегка лукавите, или просто себя изводите
Evgesha39 (2020-01-27 08:48:21+00:00): Мне просто очень интересно и увлекательна эта работа, по возможности рисую сколько могу! Так давненько уже не рисовала, пока нет информиации. Очень рада с Вами общаться!!!
gendy54 (2019-12-09 22:54:51+00:00): Bonjour,

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.
le tag building=residential fait la même chose.
Sinon ne supprimez pas le tag source
et enfin les tags city et postcode sont inutiles en France
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76506743
mueschel (2019-11-02 10:55:30+00:00): Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of keys.
It's "fire_hydrant:city", not "fire_hydrant:sity".

Thanks
Jan
muralito (2019-11-01 17:17:03+00:00): Hola. El OSMOSE reporta incorrectamente sobre la abreviatura de numero, en español no vale esa regla.
Camello_AR (2019-11-01 18:22:07+00:00): En realidad corregía otro problema que tienen muchas escuelas sobre caracteres no imprimibles en una importación masiva
eggie (2019-11-01 17:59:13+00:00): Dag MrWorldWideMapper,

er zitten nu wel erg veel functie op het gebouw. Je kunt ook apart op de vier adresnodes bijtaggen. Dat levert dan ook symbolen op en wellicht meer duidelijkheid. 
MVG,
Eggie
abrensch (2019-11-03 08:43:17+00:00): Hallo MVG38,

was ist denn der Status der K33?

Sieht irgendwie so aus, als wolltest Du sie freigeben, aber da steht nochaccess=no dran.

Ich sehe auf Mappiliary-Bidern von 2017, dass wohl der Bahnübergang gesperrt war.
MVG38 (2019-11-03 14:43:23+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Das hatte ich beim Editieren übersehen. Die K 33 ist jetzt komplett saniert worden (neue Straßendecke) und zwischen der B 83 und Hohenkirchen wieder für alle Verkehrsteilnehmer befahrbar.
gscholz (2019-11-02 10:13:58+00:00): Hi GJRojas,
please whatch out not to create overlapping ways. ID shows a warning if your try to upload this kind of error.
Guido
shaikh solaiman (2019-11-04 06:46:48+00:00): hi, your tracing is  really good. Great work but when you draw a building, just select it and then press "q" button to square the shape. Thank you. Keep mapping. Regards-Solaiman
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76507678
Mic6464 (2023-11-06 16:14:02+00:00): Bonjour orhygine,

je pense qu'il y a une erreur sur les chemins piétons que tu as créé depuis la rue Casamajor de Planta jusqu'à Maurice Ravel et qui traversent des maisons.
Ce que je ne comprends pas c'est que iD ne m'a signalé ces problèmes que ce matin alors que cela date de 4 ans. A moins que je n'ai pas voulu voir les problèmes lorsque je validais mes modifs. C'est possible aussi.

Bonne journée à toi.
orhygine (2023-11-07 06:29:33+00:00): Salut, merci pour ce signalement, content d'échanger avec un contributeur local.
Pourrais-tu me préciser la nature de l'erreur ?  Quel est l'identifiant du chemin concerné ? J'avoue ne pas voir où se situe le problème. Merci.
orhygine (2023-11-07 12:41:11+00:00): C'est bon, j'ai trouvé d'où venait l'erreur, un point avait bien été déplacé. C'est corrigé dans le changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143735423.
DD1GJ (2019-11-02 00:39:12+00:00): Hallo Oschi Almke,

obwohl ich Dich schon vor fast zwei Jahren auf das Tagging der Rettungspunkte hingewiesen hatte, hast du nun diesen Punkt bereits zum dritten Mal zerstört. Ich habe das korrekte tagging erneut wieder hergestellt und möchte Dich bitten, zukünftig keine Veränderungen mehr an diesem Punkt mehr vorzunehmen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point

Viele Grüße, Joachim
mikkolukas (2020-04-09 02:02:23+00:00): It makes no sense to add foot=no

It should only be applied when it is actually forbidden (by e.g. a sign) for pedestrians to use that way.
Tri_Hugger (2020-04-10 22:47:23+00:00): Hello mikkolukas! I added the "foot=no" tag as a way to prevent pedestrians from crossing the highway at locations that are not marked with physical barriers, pavement markings and signage for pedestrian crossing (ex. way 787823760, way 789768853, way 789768777, way 741049472). Although an able-bodied person could potentially cross at any location, these are the intended crossings which protect pedestrians from vehicles by design. It seems inappropriate to suggest pedestrians cross at locations such as this, where a pedestrian island with “keep right” signs exists a few dozen meters away, even though there is not explicit signage restricting pedestrian crossings here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=56.46098030887571&lng=10.026305790471776&z=17.18922557441852&pKey=Ojl4F7gnlavCgT4lr3Fauw&focus=photo&x=0.49851064886684365&y=0.5902936264303927&zoom=0.
mikkolukas (2020-04-11 00:24:20+00:00): I fully agree that pedestrians should be guided to other crossings, but that task is not the responsibility of the dataset. In the bottom I'll explain where that responsibility lies.

The same way we don't put hgv=no on small streets if there is no sign forbidding to do so, even if it would be practically impossible for a large truck to pass through (we can use other helper tools though, like maxwidth:physical=*)

One of the few rules for mapping is "we map only what exists". It's a mere observation, not up to us to judge whether it would be a good idea.

When we set access restrictions it is only because there actually exist a sign, law or other measure that tells us that pedestrians are actually not allowed to use this way.

The actual responsibility for where to *suggest* people or vehicles to go, is at the routing engines (e.g. GraphHopper, OSRM). They are to read the map and interpret which suggestions (good or bad) they want to relay to the user.

In the case of where pedestrians should cross the routing engine could be programmed to try to favor actual crossings instead of just following a road - exactly like it can suggest vehicles to favor larger roads through a city instead of a route of backroads.

The point I'm making here is: What we put on the map is not suggestions, but just "what exists". It is up to software or people to read and make suggestions or opinions about what to do with the data.

I hope it make sense.