piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kartonage (2019-02-12 15:40:07+00:00): Das "deutsche Openstreetmap" spiegelt gewiss nicht diesen Standpunkt wieder, weil du dich hier auf die Übersetzung eines Editors (iD-Editors) beziehst, dem du hier Folge leistest, ohne dass das in irgendeiner Weise im verbreiteten Tagging wiedergespiegelt wird. Weder hat sich amenity=kindergarten für das Gelände etabliert, noch findet eine Unterscheidung der Altersklassen in dieser Weise statt. amenity=childcare und amenity=creche sind ziemlich undefinierte Begriffe für Einrichtungen die in vielen Bereichen Überlappungen mit dem kindergarten-Tagging haben. Nur anhand dessen ist keine Unterscheidung möglich, weil es nicht wirklich definiert ist. Für die von dir gewünschten Unterschiede gibt es subtags, die du aber auch nicht benutzt um irgendeine Unterscheidung maßgeblich der von dir genannten Punkte zu machen. Das das Tagging im deutschen eine Abstrahierung einer Bergifflichkeit ist, sollte klar sein. Nur weil der Überbegriff in regionalen Bereichen "Kindertagesstätte" ist heißt es nicht, dass es nicht in der weltweiten Definition von amenity=kindergarten Platz finden kann. Man schafft nicht für jede regionale Eigenheit neue Obertags, wenn sie oberflächlich das gleiche sind.
kartonage (2019-02-14 11:33:26+00:00): Da du unbeirrt einfach weiter kindergarten in childcare änderst, nehme ich mal an, dass dir der Fakt, dass du die Daten damit allgemein verschlechterst, egal ist. Deine Vorgehensweise/Interpretation ist in der Art ein Alleingang (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten#Germany.2FAustria.2FSwitzerland).
Mohammad Madanipour (2020-09-05 14:31:23+00:00): Mal wieder selbstgerecht unterwegs, die alte Pappe ...
Carto'Cité (2019-02-22 10:41:59+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces contributions.
Il y a un souci avec la piste cyclable https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669797201, qui n'est pas reliée aux voies de circulation et ne sera donc pas utilisée par les outils de calcul d'itinéraires.
Je me demande également si elle ne fait pas doublon avec le trottoir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573923982, qui lui est bien connecté, et est indiqué comme autorisé aux cyclistes.
Comment est-ce sur le terrain : y a-t-il vraiment deux cheminements séparés ? Y a-t-il une signalisation vélos/piétons et laquelle ?
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoeloIDF
horisyu (2019-03-11 05:44:02+00:00): 甲南町に池を追加
sanchi (2019-02-12 23:08:12+00:00): Hola.

Intenta hacer cambios más pequeños y ten cuidado de lo que borras. Si esta algo piensatelo mucho antes de borrarlo. Estoy intentando recuperar información borrada de manera incorrecta y me toca deshacer ediciones inmensas. 

Un saludo.
VA00 (2019-02-12 08:05:18+00:00): I tak może zostać. Rozrysowanie szczegółów będzie trudne.
EneaSuper (2019-02-12 10:43:03+00:00): Ciao pian63, vedo che sei piuttosto attivo in zona!
Per caso riusciresti a mappare l'ambulatorio della Croce Rosa? 🙂
Mike Parfitt (2019-02-11 21:28:32+00:00): Typo in comment.  Should say Cutcombe Hill instead of Coombe Hill
maraf24 (2019-02-18 09:53:28+00:00): Zepsute skrzyżowanie. Zmiany wycofałem.
jaap de vries (2019-03-09 05:52:11+00:00): Je hebt schoolpleinen aangepast, nu staat er overal Schoolplein op terwijl het vlak dat al aangaf.
eggie (2019-03-10 08:09:15+00:00): Dag drMerry. Op veel plaatsen in W b D  zit de landuse vast aan de wegen Het is dan later extreem lastig om nog iets te verbeteren. Zou je dit niet willen doen.
Ook heb ik hier duplikaat adressen verwijderd. De adressen staan immers al op de adresnodes en hoeven niet op de gebouwen zelf.
Je kunt zulke fouten ook checken door de validator van JOSM te gebruiken. 
Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
b-jazz (2019-02-14 03:38:00+00:00): FYI, I've deleted the Restorative Farm since we aren't allowed to use Google as a source.
santamariense (2019-02-12 19:54:34+00:00): Olá. Estive revisando sua edição. Parece estar tudo OK. Qualquer dúvida que tiver não exite em perguntar.
Participe do grupo OSM RS no Telegram: https://t.me/osmrs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67114205
wille (2019-02-28 09:22:22+00:00): Hi! Please review the name of a street in this changeset. You put all the address of a place in the street name field. Thank you for you contributions to OpenStreetMap :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67114236
saintam1 (2019-02-12 06:49:00+00:00): I think this is a good compromise for the addresses. It works for search at least:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=бул.+Тодор+Александров+179%2C+София

https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=ж.к.+Илинден+бл.79+%2C+София
b0ssi (2020-11-26 06:34:52+00:00): Hi @Warin61, is the URL provided with this camp site possibly misleading? If I read the map (and link) correctly, it's the website for the Crossroads campgrounds nearby to the north, but not this site. E.g. this site may not require bookings etc. that the website is referring to. I might be wrong but though I'd check with you as this changeset added the link. Thanks!
Warin61 (2020-12-01 05:35:11+00:00): Hi,
The link was correct ... now 'page not found'. 
Now https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/camping-and-accommodation/campgrounds/lane-cove-holiday-park-caravan-park 

Crossroads campground? Do you mean Crosslands? That is a reserve managed by the local council, not the national parks service.
b0ssi (2020-12-01 05:45:58+00:00): Hi, I should have been more specific as this changeset includes edits on multiple camp sites. I meant to refer to the one labelled "Berowra Creek Camp" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2795029636#map=17/-33.63648/151.10900), which links to the *Crosslands Reserve* website (https://www.hornsby.nsw.gov.au/lifestyle/sports-and-recreation/parks-and-playgrounds/crosslands-reserve - Hornsby local gov - yes, *Crosslands* not *Crossroads*, sorry). I was wondering if that link should actually be attached to that Berowra Creek Camp Ground node, or maybe not, as they're (possibly?) not related and it might for instance indicate that the Berowra Creek campsite requires booking, while probably doesn't? Hope that clarifies what I was thinking about.
Warin61 (2020-12-01 10:32:43+00:00): Arr.. now it is clear. At the time I put that website link on the site was named "Crosslands Reserve" so I put the link on... later another mapper has changed the name ... but left the link on. I'll remove it. 

I'll also place the name and website on the camp ground a little way north ... + a few other details.
b0ssi (2020-12-01 11:55:06+00:00): Oh awesome, that makes a lot of sense. I hadn't noticed the diff in the name; thanks for updating and clarifying it all in advance!
eggie (2019-02-12 06:54:19+00:00): Beste pdok.. Je hebt nu een adres toegevoegd aan de camping. Het adres staat echter al op het woonhuis. 
Die node zou je ook kunnen gebruiken.
Verder heb je de naam van de camping name:fy en :nl=Heeg  toegevoegd als naam. Moet dit niet de woonplaats zijn?
... of heet de camping ook nog Heeg?
Mvg,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-12 06:58:04+00:00): .. aan De Burd zie ik ook een camping Watersprorcamping Heeg. 
Wellicht toch nog even kijken. 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-02-12 07:09:24+00:00): name:fy en nl=Heeg verwijderd een addr:city=Heeg toegevoegd
Mocht het toch camping Heeg betreffen geef dan een seintje.
MVG,
Eggie
canfe (2024-12-01 06:55:26+00:00): Guarda che il monumento alla Madonna dei Fiori di Bra non è un "monument" per ovvie dimensioni
enezeg (2025-10-07 11:41:25+00:00): Bonjour, les routes en construction ajoutées il y a quelques années ne sont pas visibles sur l'ortho express 2025. peut-on les supprimer ? merci!
DiaouligRu (2025-10-07 12:10:17+00:00): Bonjour. En effet, le projet qui devait initialement voir le jour assez rapidement a été marqué par des délais liés notamment à des problématiques d'évacuation des eaux usées (https://actu.fr/bretagne/saint-agathon_22272/immobilier-dans-les-cotes-darmor-73-nouvelles-maisons-prevues-sur-les-hauteurs-de-guingamp_62152264.html). Les choses semblent désormais être sur la voie. Comme vous le dites, les routes en construction ne sont pas visibles sur le terrain, ce qui ne correspond pas à ce qui est enregistré dans OpenStreetMap. Mon avis serait de passer d'un tag highway:construction à un highway:proposed, qui permettrait de conserver les tracés dans la base sans qu'ils n'apparaissent sur le rendu. Est-ce que ça semble raisonnable comme ça ?
enezeg (2025-10-07 12:49:25+00:00): oui, bonne idée, je m'en occupe de suite. merci pour votre retour!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-12 00:47:41+00:00): This isn't a park. Might I suggest adding landuse=grass if you want to map the green space around the church?
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-12 00:26:27+00:00): Please be more considerate. Rochester Municipal Park is a park, not woods.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-12 00:23:40+00:00): Why did you change this baseball pitch to a wood?
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-12 00:21:41+00:00): What were you trying at add here? You mapped a park right over South Saginaw Street.
mueschel (2019-02-14 11:59:53+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "snow route" to several roads. What does it mean? It's not used in any other place.

Jan
glen (2019-02-15 01:16:28+00:00): In our community, the high priority routes are also snow routes, this means they get cleared first in a snow storm. these routes also carry the most cars
mueschel (2019-02-15 08:56:49+00:00): I see. I think you should have a look here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:snowplowing
and to the keys that are linked on this page. I'm sure there is something that fits your needs.

Jan
bimbo666 (2019-02-12 00:50:41+00:00): Befahrbar bis Höhe Garagen Gebäude 66 und 15.
RicoElectrico (2019-02-12 20:58:36+00:00): Jest OK :)

Dzięki za dodanie. Ja zastanawiałem się jakie edycje zrobić z pamięci żeby polepszyć ranking ( http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?RicoElectrico ), a zapomniałem o tej wielkiej dziurze w ziemi, którą mijałem tyle razy ostatnio :D
Rich1234 (2019-05-31 05:26:18+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.  Please note that your edit to Clarenford Station park here modified the park boundaries to link several of the edges of the park boundary to coincide with the way defining 13th street.  However, remember that in OSM, streets are defined by a single line running down the center of the street.  Yet in the real world, all streets have a real width.  Moving the park boundary polygon to coincide with the street way would mean that the area of the park would extend across half of the width of the street all the way to the very center of the pavement.

In the real world, no one would consider the "edge" of a park to coincide with the center-line of the adjacent street.  The edge of the park would coincide with the outer edge of the street.  So moving the boundary of the park to coincide with the way defining the street would incorrectly denote the real world boundary of the area of the park itself.

I have disconnected the park boundary from the street center line and aligned it with the true edge of the park (as seen in the Esri imagery).

Also, note this sentence on this page here in the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways under the section titled "Crossing ways": "Note that navigable ways should not be connected with other ways like landuse etc."  Connecting the park boundary to the street way would be connecting a navigable way (the street) with a non-navigable area (the park area).
Supaplex (2019-02-16 09:44:01+00:00): Is there a name for the cafe?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67117189
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Thomas8122 (2019-02-13 17:21:18+00:00): *facepalm*
Kohren-Sahlis steht schon in addr:suburb, ich hab das ja nicht umsonst entfernt
Supaplex (2019-03-01 11:49:20+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
vani_paru (2019-07-12 06:04:45+00:00): Hi Zainab IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the nodes from node 6270773831 till node 6270773894 classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2019-09-09 07:07:50+00:00): heloo vani. i'm riyadi, zainab is one of my coworking. i do agree with your suggestion. 
otherside, task which your worked in, isn't surabaya. 

happy mapping
aharvey (2019-03-21 13:08:09+00:00): not sure where you got the details for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1811205304 from, but on the ground I could find no evidence of a camp ground here...
Warin61 (2019-03-21 23:07:50+00:00): Arr... error.
Original entry for this was from gdal .. I have deleted some of his entries... I think they are illegal 'camp sites' used by self contained RVers for over night stops. Someone travelling in Africa wants to have some indication of these kind of 'stops'. Where I think I got 'my' additions from was a web search that got me that rivierdal one in Tumut. I am up dating that now.
rainerU (2019-02-12 06:02:04+00:00): Hallo Dietmar,

du hast bei der Linie 9 colour von #DF9CBB auf #DE9EBB gesetzt. Ich hatte den Wert seinerzeit aus den GTFS-Daten der SWU entnommen. Worauf stützt du dich bei der Änderung?

Grüße
Rainer
okilimu (2019-02-12 06:15:56+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
in der Relation von Gleißelstetten nach Roter Berg war dieser Wert in 2016 gesetzt worden, den habe ich als Grundlage genommen.
Ich habe jetzt die Farbe aus dem GTFS-Datensatz übernommen und setze ihn in den Relationen, danke für den Hinweis
heavyequipments (2019-02-12 05:22:26+00:00): Used Heavy Construction Equipment
pyram (2019-02-15 19:19:46+00:00): Hello Darkrecital,

thank you for adding details.
I saw, you add names like "pathway for walking" or "Tennis courts". It would be better to add instead "sport=tennis" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport ) and do not use the name-tag ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names => "Name is the name only")

happy mapping

pyram
mavl (2019-03-01 17:05:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ConsEbt (2019-02-14 06:31:58+00:00): Hey, I'm not sure if these road have been connected. Last time I've been on site they where still not. 
The boundary of the refinery will be fenced with limited entries thus I don't think this connection is correct unless you have local knowledge showing otherwise.
Rotilom (2019-02-16 10:05:25+00:00): Hi,

Sorry taking a couple of days to reply... I've been travelling.

I've undone my change.

The imagery does make it look like the two roads I joined should be connected, I must admit.

Sorry about that.

R.
Alecs01 (2019-02-18 19:54:44+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, era già mappato: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/559983473 ho cancellato il doppione
Stoertie (2019-02-12 07:31:15+00:00): Sorry, bitte löschen, da habe ich (glaube ich) etwas falsch gemacht - :-(
pitscheplatsch (2019-02-13 06:01:23+00:00): Hi Edwin Emce Crescini Salvamante, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped streets and paths which are still visible in the satellite imagery? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67122954
Jordi MF (2019-02-13 18:56:41+00:00): Hola refcovers,

He visto que has hecho múltiples modificaciones de este Punto de Interés, como si no estuvieses seguro de cómo etiquetar este comercio. ¿Necesitas alguna ayuda? Des de la comunidad de OpenStreetMap podemos intentar de ayudarte.

Saludos
Cyclono (2019-02-12 08:16:48+00:00): wow goed gedaan! Ik was hier ook aan het mappen. Dat grote gebouw iets zuiderlijk, is het een distributie centrum? aan de Schaapherderweg
Cyclono (2019-02-12 08:18:29+00:00): http://smartlogridderkerk.nl/
eggie (2019-02-12 08:30:36+00:00): 'k Zag het. Het wordt nog wat hier. 'k Weet alleen niet zeker of de betonblokken ter hoogte van de parkeerplaats Schillingstraat er nog liggen. 
Gr Eggie
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-02-12 12:01:02+00:00): name=École est invalide : amnity=school suffit à dire que c'est une école.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67123198
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-02-12 12:00:23+00:00): emergency=fire_water_pond n'est absolument pas un pont - et le pont est déjà cartographié... S'il vous plaît - faites-vous aider ! Le kiosque Orange Money nécessite amenity=money_transfer - le nom seul ne suffit pas !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67123205
mavl (2019-07-21 13:33:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-02-12 09:00:33+00:00): Dag pdok.. Nu liggen er twee restauranten met de naam Bilthoven naast elkaar. Moet dit niet de midgetgolf zijn?
MVG,
eggie
Leo Slager (2019-02-12 20:17:06+00:00): En Julianalaan 240 is niet de naam van het gebouw. Dit is de tweede waarschuwing. Als je zo doorgaat vraag je erom dat je account geblokkeerd wordt.
Leo Slager (2019-02-12 20:41:41+00:00): Ik breng wat wijzigingen aan.
Namen gecorrigeerd.
diverse tags toegevoegd met oa telefoon, website, openings_hours
eggie (2019-02-12 08:36:37+00:00): Ahh Jaap.. nu begrijp ik je tags. Het is destination (bestemmingsverkeer)  voor motor_vehicle. 
Even nog ter lering ende vermaeck.

Een track heeft altijd een tracktype.
Bv
highway=track
tracktype=grade2
..
grade1 is verhard , grade2 halfverhard (bv gravel)  grade3= onverhard 
grade 5 nauwelijks zichtbaar.
Kijk even in de wiki naar tracktype.
Gr Eggie
mavl (2019-03-01 17:05:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
eggie (2019-02-12 08:40:55+00:00): Jaap.. Geen adressen zetten op de gebouwen zelf. Die bevinden zich al op de BAG adresnodes van het Kadaster. 
Het adres er dus weer afhalen.
Gebouwen die gesloopt zijn kun je verwijderen. Check dan of ze in de administratie van het Kadaster ook gesloopt zijn anders komen ze met de periodieke update met dezelfde vaart weer terug in OSM.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=zandkant%207b&resultOffset=0&objectId=1721100000026278&geometry.x=161544.07340052&geometry.y=408980.2845982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1721010000015247
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-12 09:25:33+00:00): duplikaat adres van gebouw verwijderd
kiaraSh-Q (2019-02-13 09:25:45+00:00): سلام
سوپرمارکت در مفهوم جهانی فروشگاه خیلی بزرگی هست. برای این قسمت فروشگاه های محلی و کوچک که در ایران به اشتباه سوپرمارکت خوانده شدن میتونین از تگ
shop=convenience
استفاده کنین.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-02-13 09:31:44+00:00): برای اسم کامل یک عارضه میتونین از تگ
full_name=*
استفاده کنین
Константин Гам (2019-04-18 15:58:55+00:00): Тут висит знак "Движение на велосипеде разрешено"?
trigpoint (2019-02-18 12:48:23+00:00): Hi, parking aisles alone do not make a lot of sense. Please take a little more time and care and add the car parks as well.
Cheers Phil
yaswap (2019-02-19 12:21:35+00:00): Hi trigpoint,
Thanks for looking into our edits. Can you please let us know what are car parks ?

Please let us know if you have any suggestions..
Regards,
yaswap.
trigpoint (2019-02-19 18:31:15+00:00): Hi Yaswap
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parking

Map users will search for car parks, parking aisles alone do not add much to the map. Without the surrounding car park they are no purpose.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2019-02-19 18:34:40+00:00): Sorry should have added the wiki page says that they should be added within amenity=parking.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=parking%20aisle?uselang=en
Cheers Phil
yaswap (2019-07-09 12:23:49+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for the delayed response.  Going forward we will follow your suggestions

Regards,
yaswap
Carto'Cité (2019-02-21 22:11:15+00:00): Hello John.
Merci pour la piste cyclable ajoutée le long de la Rue Gabriel Péri. J'ai l'impression qu'elle fait doublon avec la bande cyclable au nord de la rue Gutenberg : https://www.osm.org/way/97699520 et https://www.osm.org/way/23054998. Qu'en penses-tu ?
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
johnparis (2019-02-23 07:22:48+00:00): tu as raison -- je n'ai pas régardé les tags sur les rues. J'espere que c'est mieux maintenant.
eggie (2019-02-12 09:27:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-02-12 09:31:07+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
4004 (2019-02-12 22:09:12+00:00): Mo,Tu,We,Th mozhno zhe Mo-Th
Alexey Belousov (2019-02-13 08:31:47+00:00): Поправил: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67155116
alesarrett (2019-02-25 09:33:49+00:00): Ciao Freiheit, perché hai cancellato questo sentiero? Vedo che citi Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta: non credo sia buona norma cancellare tracce esistenti basandosi su immagini satellitari, soprattutto in contesti boscati. Tra l'altro alcuni tratti si vedono chiaramente. L'ho percorso personalmente io qualche tempo fa e confermo che esiste...
alesarrett (2019-02-25 09:36:54+00:00): Vedo ora in changeset precedente, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67124800
Forse questa cancellazione è stata un semplice errore dopo un editing della geometria?
Freiheit28 (2019-02-25 09:57:50+00:00): Buongiorno.
Ho cancellato il sentiero su specifica segnalazione del proprietario del terreno onde evitare spiacevoli contenziosi civilistici. Il sentiero passava in una zona a pascolo "privata" che il proprietario ha completamente recintato, chiudendo il sentiero. Ho invece lasciato il primo tratto di strada, quella che parte da "Contrà Gonzi" in quanto di proprietà pubblica.
alesarrett (2019-02-25 10:03:46+00:00): Capisco il motivo, ma non sarebbe più trasparente e corretto inserire il tag access=private, visto che il sentiero in realtà esiste?
Freiheit28 (2019-02-25 10:11:14+00:00): Si certo che sarebbe corretto, a mio avviso poteva anche rimanere come prima. Aggiungo che il proprietario del terreno pure si è lamentato delle tabelle direzionali presenti in Contrà Cunchele (ad inizio sentiero) installate un paio di anni fa da un gruppo bikers locali, minacciato azioni legali.
Essendo stato io a mappare il sentiero, ho ritenuto di toglierlo "momentaneamente" per placare gli animi,
Andrea Musuruane (2019-02-12 15:03:41+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. La strada che hai tracciato ha solo il tag name. Manca il tag highway per indicare il tipo di strada: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway Ciao, Andrea
utack (2019-03-16 18:06:02+00:00): Sieht soweit ok aus, vielen Dank fürs Eintragen!  
Generell kann man Punkte auch "zusammenlegen" oder "auf Straßen kleben" statt nur in die Nähe.  
Ich hab das jetzt mal gemacht, ich hoffe es war so gedacht
PT-53 (2019-03-16 18:39:40+00:00): Hallo utack,
welche Punkte kann / soll man zusammenlegen bzw. mit Straßen verkleben?
Die Mehrheit in OSM ist jedenfals gegen ein Verkleben von kanduse mit highways!
Fragende Grüße
utack (2019-03-16 19:42:19+00:00): Da es hier angefangen wurde hab ich es jetzt konsequent gemacht 
Welche Philosophie man hier vertritt ist ja verschieden ,du kannst den Spielplatz auch gern komplett separieren