piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MKnight (2023-02-15 18:14:14+00:00): Kann ich garnich so genau sagen.
Nach meinem Gefühl ist eine Autobahn eher durchgehend und alle Zubringer und Abfahrten sind links auch wenn da jeweils ein Schild steht (wenn man nach Schildern ginge gäbe es gar keine Links oder nur winzige Stummel)
unni-geo (2023-02-15 20:07:45+00:00): Also nach nochmaliger Überlegung scheint es 3 Varianten zu geben die links an verschiedenen Stellen enden zu lassen:

a) ganz früh an Punkt (erstes zusammenkommen der unterschiedlicher Richtungsfahrspuren): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2347187517
b) in der Mitte an Punkt (erstes zusammenkommen der gleicher Richtungsfahrspuren): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5591046617
c) ganz spät an Punkt (Übergang zur Bundesstrasse):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2347187469

Falls dir etwas anderes als die derzeitige Variante a) besser gefällt, ändere es gerne dementsprechend :-)
unni-geo (2023-02-15 20:16:46+00:00): Ach, mir fällt eben noch etwas ein, eventuell kamen mir die eher kurzen Abschnitte geeigneter vor, wegen der größtenteils vorhandenen uneingeschränkten vmax, siehe https://www.openstreetbrowser.org/#map=17/50.74970/11.00488&categories=car_maxspeed
PT-53 (2022-11-22 10:02:59+00:00): Dieses Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087500947/history
war gem. Maps4BW korrekt eingezeichnet gewesen.
Warum hast Du den Gebäudeumriß zum Quadrat umgestaltet?
ezekielf (2022-11-30 19:54:53+00:00): Thanks!  In the future, rather than deleting a demolished building, you might consider changing the tag from building=* to demolished:building=* and putting a note= tag on it.  Here's an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984365737
When the building is simply deleted but still visible on aerial imagery, another mapper can easily just think it's missing and add it back later.  Leaving the object in the database with a lifecycle prefix makes this less likely while still removing it from map rendering.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129210356
4004 (2022-11-27 23:24:07+00:00): лестница под углом, не ошибка? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056109507#map=19/53.71943/23.87530
Sagit_BY (2022-11-28 07:03:47+00:00): не ошибка. там как и у дома рядом, по прямой не вписывалась, и чтобы не делать слишком крутой сделали по диагонали. и там вообще по моему еще и пандус делали рядом под еще большим (с точки зрения математики по отношению к дороге это меньший угол) углом, с верху заметил лестницу
Osmwithspace (2023-01-26 11:53:24+00:00): Kann dieser Hinweis dann geschlossen werden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2562870
chris66 (2023-08-26 11:45:24+00:00): Hier ist aber gar nicht die Harthauser Straße, sondern die Jägerstraße...
Vinber-Pro (2022-11-23 17:20:02+00:00): Bonjour,
je pense qu'il y a un souci avec cette contribution :
- elle semble en dehors du batiment,
- le nom est incompréhensible,
- la clé address me surprend,
- addr:city, country et postcode ne sont pas utilisés par la communauté,
- description et description:fr sont identiques, le :fr n'est pas utile vu où se trouve l'agence
- latitude et longitude ne sont pas des clés utiles

Vous semblez utiliser un outil maison pour créer ces données, pouvez vous nous préciser d'où proviennent ces données svp ?

Au plaisir de vous lire
colargol (2022-11-24 20:48:04+00:00): Quelques remarques en complément de celles de Vincent :

Au vu de vos contributions vous semblez être une agence marketing, vous devez donc respecter les consignes pour les contributions effectuées par des entreprises : 
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Organised_Editing_Guidelines
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Modifications_automatis%C3%A9es

Je vous invite à prendre contact avec la communauté sur le forum : https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/contributeur-arturin-agence-marketing/11052 . Nous vous indiquerons comment améliorer vos contributions et les contrôler au moyen d'outils d'assurance qualité.

Cordialement,

Jérôme
gscholz (2022-11-28 07:50:00+00:00): Hi  Santanaloba53,
your recent activities have created several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-71.70257&lat=18.02319&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129210919

Can you please fix this?

There are as well a lot of overlapping buildings. Can you please fix this as well?
Kind regards
Guido
eggie (2022-11-21 21:29:32+00:00): Je zebra heb ik even aangepast.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129211265
Je ziet het op wel meer manieren.
Meest gebruikelijk is highway=crossing
crossing_ref=zebra

Ik heb het aangepast. Node ook verbinden met de weg. 
Groet
eggie
troglobiont (2022-11-22 09:23:50+00:00): Hallo Bernhard,
Um ein Tor einzutragen kannst du  barrier=gate + access=* an dem Punkt wo sich das Tor befindet verwenden. Lücken in den Straßen sind nur dann korrekt wenn vor Ort tatsächlich keine Straße existiert.
Bernhard_W (2022-11-22 19:31:48+00:00): vielen Dank
abakus_uploader (2022-11-21 23:32:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
dpolovinkin (2024-03-18 20:33:40+00:00): hi! you added a building here which is right on top of the street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488049831, and you had warnings about that: "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway"... 

warnings are not something to ignore like that :)
Discostu36 (2022-11-21 21:16:30+00:00): Du hattest um Überprüfung deiner Änderungen gebeten. Ich kann da auf Anblick nichts Problematisches entdecken, kenne die Gegend aber nicht aus eigener Anschauung.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-12-01 11:16:36+00:00): Please use the schema in URL's.

I have corrected www.first-8.dk
to
https://first-8.dk/
antonr (2022-12-01 13:17:38+00:00): Jeg tror ikke det er en URL jeg har forfattet... Den siger mig i hvert fald ikke lige noget. Men jeg husker schema til næste URL :-)
gscholz (2022-11-23 09:05:03+00:00): Hi VTAcz,
this changeset has added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=20.59355&lat=40.16624&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129212474

This kind of errors irritates routing software and look ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?

You may also like to educate yourself how to map hiking routes properly to avoid such errors:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dhiking

Kind regards
Guido
VTAcz (2022-11-23 09:57:31+00:00): Hello,

I believe I have just reverted the changes.

Best,
SomeoneElse (2022-11-22 12:21:33+00:00): Just like I mentioned previously on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126649142 , please try and use better descriptions than just "segment deleted".
Best Regards,
Andy
Bravo Mapper (2022-11-22 13:41:27+00:00): Dear Andy ,

Noted.
I use simple words in changesets when the change is not significant.
They have shifted the area a little to the east シ.
abakus_uploader (2022-11-21 23:32:04+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
impiaaa (2023-02-22 01:34:57+00:00): Make sure you're looking around for duplicates before you add something! The building was already tagged with the shop information.
ykim3848 (2023-02-28 20:20:03+00:00): Yeah, I should have asked you guys. I thought we wanted the businesses as points, so I added it but did not do anything with the existing information.  I've done that more than once, I am afraid although I also left it alone sometimes when I saw the business information in a building.  I will not add redundant points from now on.  Thanks.
Yan_0711 (2022-11-21 22:07:51+00:00): Kommentar versehentlich leer ... Quelle war primär "survey" beim eintragen dann unterstützt von Luftbild.
emersonveenstra (2022-11-21 22:22:17+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution! You added layer=-1 to the building, which means that the drive-through goes over top of the building. To correct this, you should split the drive-through and add `tunnel=building_passage` to the part that crosses the building. Thanks!
Magnesium3826 (2022-11-21 22:48:17+00:00): Appreciate the feedback. I split the portion that goes under the building as suggested and tagged the new segment with tunnel=building_passage, and I changed the layer of both the road and building to 0. Hopefully that's all correct.
silversurfer83 (2022-11-23 16:02:11+00:00): Willkommen im Sauerland. Hier hast du mit Vespucci ein wenig die Geometrien versaut. Da du keinen ordentlichen Kommentar hinterlassen hast, lässt sich für mich auch nicht nachvollziehen, was das soll. Vermutlich werde ich diese Änderung einfach mal rückgängig machen müssen, damit alles wieder passt.
Merke: Gerade mit den mobilen Editoren vorsichtig sein, welche Knoten du gerade aktiv hast und ob du wirklich wischt oder einen Knoten verschiebst :)
(ist mir auch schon passiert)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129214216
west89 (2022-11-23 19:52:53+00:00): Wenn ich wieder Zuhause bin mach ich es JOSM.
starsep (2022-11-21 22:52:50+00:00): Footpaths might seem reduntant. They are not. Routing applications use highway=footway ways, I am not aware of any using area:highway=footway. 

It is ok to keep area:highway=footway, although from experience it causes more issue than it's worth, but please keep highway=footway ways.
Debjaro (2022-11-21 23:11:58+00:00): Added them again.

Are you serious? No routing through area:highway=footway? And just because you haven't seen one, does it mean that there isn't one? How many source codes have you audited to state something with such confidence?

This evening is very annoying, and I just wanted to map. So many disagreements, but now you talk technical, so I am interested.
starsep (2022-11-22 20:35:08+00:00): Why would you think using area:highway=footway is trivial? Most routing algorithms use modified Dijkstra/A* with ways as graph edges. I see no easy way to add support for area:highway with good performance. 

You can see which projects use this tag at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/area%3Ahighway#projects

I never stated there is no such app, I only said I am not aware of one. I am software developer and I have read in high detail few routing implementations. I try to be up-to-date with what popular apps use.

According to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area=yes_on_a_highway
> as of 2019, OpenTripPlanner is the only OSM-based router that supports routing over areas. It does so by computing a visibility graph over the area
See more details at https://scribe.nixnet.services/@giscience/routing-through-open-spaces-a-performance-comparison-of-algorithms-b49b6ec43d6a
NorthCrab (2022-11-21 23:44:11+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikacje.

Bus stopping position jest opcjonalnym dodatkiem do bus stop. Samo w sobie nie wystarczy.

Dokładna instrukcja mapowania przystanków: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport#Buses

A tutaj przykład mapowania:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.21047/20.98710
NorthCrab (2022-11-21 23:45:27+00:00): ^ najważniejszym punktem w tym przykładzie jest: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369622189 - pozostałość opcjonalna. proszę tylko ustawiaj bus stop na miejscu przystanku (lub chodniku) a nie na drodze.
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-01-15 19:54:56+00:00): Новый энтузиаст-переводчик:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131244702
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131198873
mini-me (2023-01-15 21:29:06+00:00): Написал ему сообщение. Но тут вроде бы не всё транслит. Про ЗСД есть статья в вики https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_High-Speed_Diameter
OldManCelli (2024-05-06 18:30:39+00:00): Hello Stephen, can you explain what the use of w1116123055 and w1116123056 is? I don't see any sign of bicycle lanes there. Thanks and happy mapping.
Stephen L Arnold (2024-05-08 17:01:52+00:00): I am trying to show that Gilman St is one-way away from the intersection of Aldrich, but two way for bikes.  Also, there is a short, painted, contraflow bike line adjoining the intersection in each direction, probably as a warning to motorists of on-coming bikes.
If you can figure out a better way to map this, go for it!
OldManCelli (2024-05-08 20:53:24+00:00): Oh, I see now! Yikes, ya, that's a tough one. I will slowly step away from  it :) Thanks!
dannmer (2024-02-25 18:09:33+00:00): There is a note at this location stating that a tunnel here that connects the parking lots on the east side with the park on the west side. As currently mapped, there is a street crossing and the use of pedestrian areas instead of paths is making this difficult to fix. The Bing satellite imagery shows what appears to be a tunnel, can you fix this?
eggie (2022-11-22 07:45:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tosti007 (2022-11-22 08:59:47+00:00): Dankjewel, ik zal ernaar kijken!

Groetjes,
tosti007
ovruni (2022-11-22 00:30:19+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha colocado S/N, lo cual no es nombre sino una descripción para referirse a algo que no tiene nombre. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
ovruni (2022-11-22 00:31:41+00:00): Hola danita3, aqui ha menciona "cambio vias", sin embargo se ha eliminado un colegio, he revertido el conjunto de cambios. Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
danita3 (2022-11-22 14:38:43+00:00): Hola, realice varios cambios, pero solo coloque la etiqueta del cambio mas relevante, él colegio en cuestión no existe en la zona.
ovruni (2022-11-22 23:06:34+00:00): Varios de los cambios realizados se realizaron con "OpenStreetMap (Standard)", la cual no es una imagen de satélite, por otra parte, varias de estas vías tienen una alineación con la imagen de Esri Clarity Beta.
Saludos
emersonveenstra (2022-11-22 02:11:39+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution! Road names must not be abbreviated in OSM, would you mind changing 'Rd.' to Road'? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129215999
WoodWoseWulf (2022-11-22 23:58:57+00:00): Hi Professor John Finklestein,

Welcome back to OSM. The park you added here appears to intersect buildings and roads.

I'm also unable to find a reference to a Zetrouer Park at all in any resource.

Noting that when you were last active you added some parks over houses in a similar fashion, are you able to provide more information about this park?

Cheers!
emersonveenstra (2022-11-22 11:38:46+00:00): Hi,

Could you also fix the abbreviated road name here, and please go back through your changes, there's a few more I saw. Thanks!
MxxCon (2022-11-23 00:54:14+00:00): According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island

"traffic_calming=island – A traffic island that is not built as a refuge at pedestrian crossings, but to calm traffic." 🤔
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129216794
akadouri (2022-11-23 02:03:43+00:00): Yeah I go back and forth on it, technically this calms traffic and is also used by pedestrians.

landuse=traffic has been abandoned.

crossing:island=yes seems to be for nodes.

area:highway=traffic_island is another option.

I'm not sure it really matters to tag an island as whether or not pedestrians are allowed on it, that should be indicated by a footway going over it.

quick stats (NYS):
area:highway=traffic_island (19)
traffic_calming=island (344)
traffic_calming=painted (1)
traffic_calming=yes (7)
landuse=traffic_island (10)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dtraffic_island

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area#traffic_island

Anyway, happy to change this to `area:highway=traffic_island` if you think that makes more sense.
MxxCon (2022-11-23 02:58:02+00:00): There's also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dtraffic_island
tux67 (2022-11-22 09:15:24+00:00): Hi, du hattest review requested angehakt. Grundsätzlich war der change o.k. wenn "on the ground" die Gebäude abgrissen sind. Ich hab' das nur mal auf lifecycle tags angepasst. Wenn du einen landuse=brownfield haben willst, dann könntest du dafür _eine_ separate Fläche für das Grundstück einzeichnen.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129217110
dritter (2022-11-23 16:59:15+00:00): Hi tux67!

Danke für deine Hilfe. Das removed-Präfix hatte mir gefehlt. An dem brownfield hänge ich nicht, ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob irgendwann hier nochmal ein Gebäude entsteht, oder ob die Fläche wirklich eine Brachfläche bleibt.

Schöne Grüße,
dritter
wireguy (2022-11-22 12:09:51+00:00): Hi Sombrero.   I've updated the hours.   The easy way is to use youhours link https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?oh=Mo-Fr%2010:00-18:00;%20Sa%2010:00-17:00
Frans S (2022-11-22 13:10:20+00:00): Hello again. 
Here you mapped several roads as a track, despite they connect settlements.
In short. Highways connecting settlements, isolated dwellings, villages etc. should be tagged as highway=unclassified in rural areas.
The same roads, wide < 2 mtr: as path.
Tracks are roads leading to farmland, woods or river. No through going traffic.

 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129217932
neoLithos (2025-09-27 13:20:49+00:00): Hi Olyon.

Could you please help me find out where exactly the street name sign is located for this road?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180995423

During my walk, I noticed a sign at the crossing with 'Route des Hières' that showed the name 'Impasse du Faure,' and I’d like to know which one is correct.

I wish you a nice weekend.
Greetings, neo.

Translated to french:
Bonjour Olyon.

Pourriez-vous m'aider à trouver où se trouve exactement le panneau indiquant le nom de cette rue ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180995423

Au cours de ma promenade, j'ai remarqué un panneau au croisement avec la « Route des Hières » qui indiquait le nom « Impasse du Faure », et j'aimerais savoir lequel est correct.

Je vous souhaite un bon week-end.
Cordialement, neo.
DressyPear4 (2022-11-23 16:04:47+00:00): Olá, evite adicionar nomes em caixa alta.
Fiz Ajustes aqui.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129218224
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-19 08:04:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975449797/history has shop = general_stores that was added in this edit
shop=general_stores ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it shop=general? Multiple shop=general? Is any of values from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop matching well?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Frans S (2022-11-22 13:02:58+00:00): Hello. We welcome you as a new mapper.
Global validators review changesets, particularly of new mappers, to give input on mapping skills where necessary.
Your mappings of hedges in general are fine. Please read the instructions which hedges are important. 
Do not connect roads to hedges as well. These are errors. Avoid to connect these to each other.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129219782
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-22 04:33:20+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJCZWdpbl9Qb2ludCI6WzAsMzQ4LjQ4OF19&location=31.265583%2C-86.263845%2C15.35&style=ROUTE_NAME
Warin61 (2022-11-23 05:06:00+00:00): Relation 14920117 deleted. Same problem as last relation of yours I just deleted. You will keep on making the same error untill you realize the error.
jeslop (2022-11-29 21:31:44+00:00): Hola Carlanguitas. No uses OsM para estas ediciones. Ahí no hay ningún castilo.

Lo elimino.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-22 04:40:38+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJCZWdpbl9Qb2ludCI6WzAsMzQ4LjQ4OF19&location=33.647941%2C-86.424495%2C16.20&style=ROUTE_NAME
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-22 04:44:35+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJCZWdpbl9Qb2ludCI6WzAsMzQ4LjQ4OF19&location=33.648476%2C-86.423803%2C16.20&style=ROUTE_NAME