piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
philippec (2021-01-25 20:48:20+00:00): Het is natuurlijk GP 300 en GP 200.  Ik veronderstel dat  GP 200 zo ver doorloopt.
philippec (2021-01-25 20:52:03+00:00): ZO ok https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/umPeu3rApY3GZS4i05OP7Q
Hb- (2021-01-26 14:59:44+00:00): Do you have a source that the main road north of Martuni https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172298719 is only partly under Russian protection?

The maps from Russian Ministry of defence says otherwise:
http://eng.mil.ru/en/russian_peacekeeping_forces/infographics.htm
eggie (2021-01-25 20:54:24+00:00): Bert.. Lijkt me perfect zo!

MVG
eggie
frosm (2021-01-25 21:19:57+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
pourriez-vous svp ajouter l'attribut principal décrivant que c'est une épicerie ? c'est indispensable pour que votre contribution soie utilisable par les différents outils.
n'hésitez pas aussi si vous le souhaitez à rajouter un moyen de contact (site web par ex). et à placer le point dans le batiment au lieu d'être sur le trottoir :)
Bonne continuation
moreno96 (2021-01-25 20:55:02+00:00): سلام
با توجهی به صحبتی که تو گروه شد، لطفا روی استان هایی تصحیحاتتون رو انجام بدید که حداقل مرز استانی ـشون به روز شده باشه.
اگر در استانی که مرزهای استان و شهرستان به روز نشدن، دهستان ها تصحیح بشن، احتمال داره مشکلاتی مثل اختلاف موقعیت رو به همراه داشته باشه.
ممنون
farhad_y (2021-01-25 21:01:52+00:00): سلام
حتما ببخشید که حواسم نبود
Hb- (2021-01-26 02:19:26+00:00): You deleted a lot of nodes which are still needed. Including a mountain top.

I reverted large parts of this edit with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98150348

The new peacekeeping border does not change the borders of the historic rayons.
JulesGabrielVerne (2021-01-29 08:21:24+00:00): Droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/900094915 jaki ma rodzaj utwardzenia?
esce (2021-01-29 12:20:17+00:00): Prawdopodobnie utwardzenie kruszywem - jeśli nie mam pewności, nie oznaczam tagiem 'tracktype'.
rivermont (2021-02-03 01:02:31+00:00): Hey ottwiz,
is this landcover an import or something or was it traced from the NAIP imagery? It doesn't really seems to align to anything except some small sections of it.
Unless you plan on updating it I think it needs removed because of how inaccurate it is.
ottwiz (2021-02-03 11:50:21+00:00): It was traced from NAIP, but i haven't finished it yet, I'm going to update it. I use fastdraw and I was noticed that it's kindof a bit inaccurate, but I'll expand it just because of the massive size of the forest it's not easy to draw it, and also i want to add the landuses as well in the area, I plan going upwards Eskdale then go down to Beckley. I'm working on this with RoccoAWD who maps the buildings, me the forests. I'm aware of it, don't worry. just the amount of the coal mines are a lot.
Also, for a changeset i'm not planning to go beyond 2-3 or 4k changes. :)
ottwiz (2021-02-03 11:55:38+00:00): Also for inaccurity, I used fastdraw in JOSM to draw the areas, because I hate when I have to "click click click"  a dozen, it's enough to say that I did Marshall County WV with this method  and it's aint good :D My other project is Coshocton County Ohio, but that's pretty much well done where I mapped. I'll look through the mines and align them where I can. NAIP is the most recent imagery by the way around the Marsh Fork area, that's why I trace from that.
ottwiz (2021-02-03 11:59:45+00:00): Okay, where i can see leaf-on Maxar imagery, that means it's recent, but for example in Rock Creek it's like 10 years old. (leaf-off imagery)
rivermont (2021-02-03 21:01:09+00:00): Ok sounds good, at least you're working on it. Sometimes mappers just dump a block of forest and leave it lol.

I'm also doing landcover in the area but I'll try to leave space so we don't end up duping areas.

As for imagery, try to use the Esri (not Clarity) layer; it uses mostly Maxar but they align it better. Bing is also very pretty in some areas here but doesn't have full coverage.
ottwiz (2021-02-03 21:05:21+00:00): Yeah, though i checked out and Esri out there is kindof  old, more like 10+ years old, that's why I want to reference from NAIP, because that's the most recent one. Mapbox uses Maxar too, but it's a little bit more blurry. I wish Esri made newer imagery lol. Oh yeah, today i made around 10k+ changes XD
ottwiz (2021-02-03 21:08:31+00:00): Actually saying, in Coshocton Ohio it's good to have the Esri Imagery because it uses leaf-on imagery of Maxar, not leaf off, the leaf-on area is pretty unaligned
rivermont (2021-02-03 22:01:04+00:00): the Esri Clarity stuff is really old but regular Esri is usually within a year or two. NAIP loads really slow for me
Adamant1 (2021-01-26 00:23:28+00:00): repair=assisted_self_service is rendered by at least one map that I am aware of. Which you are screwing up by getting rid of the tag. So, I suggest you don't get rid of it again.
Adamant1 (2021-01-26 00:24:59+00:00): Also, you should revert your edit here by adding it back so their map isn't messed up by your edit.
GinaroZ (2021-01-30 22:26:33+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. I've removed the duplicate hospital node you added, as the surrounding area is already tagged as a hospital.
dzidek23 (2021-01-27 14:05:47+00:00): Cześć,
Zastanawiam się, czy jest sens w dodawaniu pojedynczych chodników w obszarze Rynku. Praktycznie cały obszar jest wyłącznie dla ruchu pieszego (nie licząc służb porządkowych i dostaw) więc rysowanie niepołączonych chodników, choć wygląda ładnie jest mało praktyczne. Co powiesz na usunięcie tych chodników i przykładem Wrocławskiego rynku stworzenie: highway=pedestrian area=yes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21981
Brian@Brea (2021-01-27 05:38:33+00:00): Hello,
There are some massive errors with edits on the Disneyland Resort made in this change set. I have already reverted the changes I deemed were made in error. The biggest fault was the change of the DL Central Bakery to the Grand Bakery which looking at the data you posted is located in Seattle region and has nothing to do with a backstage facility at a Theme Park.
Mxdanger (2021-01-27 06:21:43+00:00): Thank you for making those fixes.
Mxdanger (2021-01-27 06:43:17+00:00): However, could you explain what other things were considered massive errors other than that business? I would like to know so I wouldn’t do it again.
dgitto (2021-01-27 09:07:48+00:00): uhm.. why to delete the building. the building is actually there. I added the road also
eggie (2021-01-25 21:53:42+00:00): Met access=destination zal het niet routeren..
Beter verwijderen die regel.
Gr eggie
Comitatus (2021-01-25 22:08:19+00:00): ik zag dat die bij veel andere mtb routes wel wordt gebruikt namelijk.
eggie (2021-01-25 22:15:53+00:00): 
..access=destination is een algemene accesstag. Dat lijkt me niet van toepassing.
Wat zegt de wiki?
Vaak heb je een vignet nodig...
Volgens mij hoort er
... bicycle=designated
Met
.. bicycle:designated:type=mtb
Kijk even in de wiki en anders even vragen aan de mtb experts.
Kan ook op het forum van osm.
Commodoortje of multimodaal weten het anders wel.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-01-25 22:18:58+00:00): motor_vehicle=designated lijkt ook geheel niet correct hier. Gewoon die regel weghalen.
Dat betekent dat dit pad speciaal voor motorvoertuigen is aangewezen.
eggie (2021-01-25 22:20:53+00:00): Je edits..
Ik weet dat de mtb mappers bicycle=designated taggen.
Daar zijn al heel wat discussies over gevoerd. 
Je hebt er nu yes van gemaakt. 
Neus eens rond op het forum in de draadjes die over mtb gaan.
eggie (2021-01-25 22:55:22+00:00): .. en wellicht bicycle=permissive  als er een vignet is vereist?
eggie (2021-01-25 23:02:24+00:00): motor_vehicle-designated heb ik vast verwijderd.  Dat is echt onmogelijk hier.
BCNorwich (2021-01-28 10:28:16+00:00): Hi, You're still making lots of duplicate highways around here. Please be a bit more careful and stop placing highway atop highway. Why? Because it seriously disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard.
Shaun das Schaf (2021-01-25 22:47:41+00:00): Hallo sunspire, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Die neue Straße sollte vermutlich eher eine Ortstraße (highway=residential) anstatt einer Nebenstraße (highway=unclassified) sein.

Siehe auch im Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dresidential

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Allison P (2024-09-05 04:45:21+00:00): These houses are in Wisconsin, not Michigan. Please fix addr:state values
kpv8 (2021-01-26 00:51:03+00:00): Dlaczego zostały usunięte bloki w Różance i kilka innych istniejących budynków?
Olga | Yanosik (2021-01-26 13:28:41+00:00): Żadnych budynków nie ruszałam, zrobiłam tylko import punktów adresowych. W którym miejscu powinny być?
syntex (2021-01-26 23:14:04+00:00): Kilkanaście budynków ci się skasowało https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=98146548
Olga | Yanosik (2021-01-27 09:18:14+00:00): Dziękuję za sprawdzenie, budynki naprawione. Na przyszłość będę sprawdzać po każdym imporcie.
maraf24 (2021-01-28 12:58:30+00:00): Nie prościej było przywrócić skasowane budynki? Niektóre miały nazwy.
Olga | Yanosik (2021-01-28 14:38:40+00:00): A jak przywrócić budynki nie revertując importu?
maraf24 (2021-01-28 15:33:27+00:00): Sa dwie metody: rewertem selektywnym lub przy kilku obiektach - użycie innej wtyczki - Undelete.
Olga | Yanosik (2021-01-28 17:48:21+00:00): ok, sprawdzę i zadziałam
fkv (2021-01-29 05:00:38+00:00): Das ist kein Park, sondern eine Schlucht und schon lange als solche eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364032065
quokkster (2021-01-29 06:22:50+00:00): In den letzten Jahren hat dich die Erlaufschlucht immer mehr zum Touristenhotspot gewandelt. Es wurde auch nicht die ganze Schlucht als Park eingetragen, sondern nur der Teil vom Fischersteig, den man den Leuten zum Durchwandern anbietet - vom Startpunkt beim Bowlingcenter bis zur Romantikbrücke. Dieser Teil wird regelmäßig in Schuss gehalten, daher wird auch Eintritt verlangt. Der Eintrag als Park spiegelt den großen Auswand wieder, den die Gemeinde hierfür betreibt.
fkv (2021-01-29 11:59:40+00:00): Das liest sich wie eine Werbebroschüre. Die Wahrheit ist, dass die Gemeinde die Touristen nur abzocken will und sich die rechtswidrige (Naturdenkmal!) Naturverschandelung durch Drahtseile usw. überwiegend aus Landesförderungen finanzieren ließ. Mit einem Park hat das so oder so nichts zu tun, denn diese Verschandelungen beschränken sich auf den Fischersteig und die Bereiche außerhalb der Schlucht. Wenn man sich nur 2m vom Fischersteig entfernt, bzw. am rechten Ufer überall, ist noch alles ziemlich naturbelassen. Mit einem Park (mit Rasen, Blumenbeeten, asphaltierten Wegen usw.) hat das überhaupt nichts zu tun. Würde man die Erlaufschlucht wegen des Fischersteigs für einen Park halten, dann wären auch Rax und Schneeberg Parks wegen der versicherten Klettersteige.
Holek (2021-01-25 23:35:18+00:00): No popatrz, myślałem, że StreetComplete zapytałby się o składowe adresu, a nie tylko o numer budynku. Dodam jutro, jak usiądę przy komputerze.
eggie (2021-01-25 22:58:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback: Meestal hebben adressen toch wel een vaste plaats in een gebouw. Je hebt nu hetr adres ook verplaatst. Klopt dat wel?

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
sinaw1998 (2021-01-25 23:26:12+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Ja ik had hem de eerste keer verkeerd geplaatst. De hele campus is burgemeester Oudlaan 50. Het café zit (op de kaart met het noorden boven) linksonder in Hatta Building.

Volgensmij staat hij na mijn wijziging nu goed, dus dan zal ik hem ook niet meer in de toekomst verplaatsen.

Bedankt voor je feedback!
eggie (2021-01-26 07:28:25+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk
gr eggie
Enderbyte99 (2021-01-26 22:16:45+00:00): I’d like to thank you for correcting my mistakes :D
3ngineer (2021-01-26 23:17:10+00:00): No problem, we all just tag with the best data available to us. And mapping is fun anyway.
VA00 (2022-04-18 14:35:17+00:00): Nie tylko relacja, usunąłeś przy okazji pieczołowicie odrysowany przeze mnie z GPS w ręku nowy fragment żwirowni, którego nadal nie widać na orto. Proszę przywrócić.
B_KSL (2022-04-19 00:32:19+00:00): To raczej nie do mnie żale. Tym zestawem usunąłem jedynie niepotrzebną relację przenosząc jej tagowanie na linię będącą jedynym jej elementem. Nie usuwając ani nie modyfikując geometrii żadnych linii. Mało tego - po mnie dopiero coś tam do tej żwirowni dorysowywałeś (w styczniu 2021). W IV 2021 ktoś coś tam usuwał przy tej żwirowni zestawem 103589360. Nie widzę potrzeby przywracania usuniętej relacji
VA00 (2022-04-19 05:22:06+00:00): Ano faktycznie, popatrzyłem na historię w odwrotnej kolejności: https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/663013505
masquer (2021-01-26 19:00:50+00:00): Виглядає, що об'єкти додані зі зміщенням на десяток метрів в сторону південного заходу. Дивлюсь на набір змін в osmcha.org, тут базова карта добре вирівняна, збігається з іншими об'єктами в околицях.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98147391
Ivan Gurov (2021-01-26 19:07:03+00:00): Рисовал по бингу, заметил много швов со сдвигом в фотоснимках, надо будет проверить на обходе местности. У мапбокса и бинга очень сдвинута карта в многих местах
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:42:13+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
marc__marc (2021-02-24 15:50:18+00:00): Bonjour,
ou est-ce que ces opérations de masse ont-elle été discutée ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Politique_de_modification_automatis%C3%A9e
Cordialement,
Marc
_Mathieu_ (2021-02-24 16:00:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Il ne s'agit pas de modifications automatisées.
Cordialement,
Mathieu
marc__marc (2021-02-24 16:03:48+00:00): Merci pour ton retour.
as-tu lu la page en question ?
l'utilisation d'overpass sur highway=trunk puis ajouter un tag sur tous les objets rendre dans la catégorie des opérations mécanisée.
ou bien as-tu utilisé une source documenté pour voir un à un les milliers de panneaux dont tu parles dans le commentaire ?
Cordialement,
Marc
_Mathieu_ (2021-02-24 16:11:55+00:00): Deuxième option (sinon ça serait bien entendu entré dans le champ de la page que tu as citée :)
Il n'y a pas de "milliers de panneaux", juste un panneau de début et un panneau de fin, sur des tronçons qui font généralement au moins quelques dizaines de kilomètres (parfois moins c'est vrai). C'est vrai que ça peut faire "impressionnant" en nombre de chemins, mais au final, ce ne sont que quelques (longues) routes.
Cordialement,
Mathieu
marc__marc (2021-02-24 16:14:30+00:00): et donc la source de ces panneaux ?
_Mathieu_ (2021-02-24 16:17:52+00:00): Le terrain :)
tguen (2021-01-26 05:06:17+00:00): Hello, I noticed at least one of the new buildings you created is a duplicate. I recommend checking the Carto imagery layer when adding buildings to ensure they don't already exist.

new: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12235088

old: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5470085
tguen (2021-01-26 05:09:45+00:00): Here are 2 more:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12235087
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12235086

Looks like it may have been an issue only with multipolygons.
Darrell (2021-01-26 05:51:52+00:00): Whoops. I can see how a multipolygon with holes might let something slip through the workflow, but in this case I think the JOSM validator caught it, and I missed the warning. I'll clean it up and double check for other any other duplicates.
Polarbear-repair (2021-03-21 22:56:17+00:00): Reverted as follows:
US: FL: Revert Fiction. DWG Ticket#2021032110000101. 
 
CS: 98719497, 98671779, 98668355, 98149401, 98149029 in CS 101456303
CS: 98148470, 93189173 in CS 101456762
CS: 93129376, 93129079 in CS 101456971
CS: 92907485 92910530, manual repairs in CS 101459803
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Polarbear-repair (2021-03-21 22:56:11+00:00): Reverted as follows:
US: FL: Revert Fiction. DWG Ticket#2021032110000101. 
 
CS: 98719497, 98671779, 98668355, 98149401, 98149029 in CS 101456303
CS: 98148470, 93189173 in CS 101456762
CS: 93129376, 93129079 in CS 101456971
CS: 92907485 92910530, manual repairs in CS 101459803
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:24:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:51:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
felipeeugenio (2021-01-27 13:01:31+00:00): Usuario vandalizando mapa agregando parques para probablemente jugar algún juego del tipo PokemonGO. Adiciones serán reversadas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98149085
skquinn (2021-01-26 02:16:40+00:00): I appreciate the effort, but if I was in over my head, I know you're going to wind up in over your head as well. There's a *lot* to clean up and it's best done with proper tools.
marczoutendijk (2021-01-26 10:34:50+00:00): Hi, Marc Zoutendijk from the DWG here:
I'm trying to revert the vandalism done by vguprhwetip, but because some of his "edits" have been reverted already, but not in the proper order, it is becoming difficult to fix everything because we now have to search for reverts of reverts of reverts...

OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
skquinn (2021-01-27 02:33:03+00:00): I retract my earlier comment.
DressyPear4 (2021-01-28 12:54:08+00:00): Olá, essa ciclovia que você adicionou existe?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/900178988
ela ficou por cima das casas.
Você pode dar uma olhada aqui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicyclede como colocar uma ciclofaixa junto com a via, como nesse exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32071236
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
kartler175 (2021-01-27 12:59:55+00:00): Warum über 1000 Knoten verschoben? Absicht, falsches Luftbilld, falsches Werkzeug oder Versehen?
GeoAgenten (2021-01-27 13:26:18+00:00): Weg: 28478746 verläuft im nördlichen Teil zwischen einem Feld im Westen und Wald im Osten und selbst nicht unter Bäumen. Daher dort die Anpassung der Wald- & Feldgrenzen. Vermutlich ist das Luftbild aus einem ungünstigen Winkel aufgenommen, denn dort scheint der Weg tatsächlich durch den Wald zu führen.
Ansonsten habe ich mit diesem Änderungssatz das zuvor nicht gekennzeichnete Waldgebiet als Wegverlauf: 900179409 eingezeichnet und die Knoten mit dem bestehenden, angrenzenden Wohngebiet bzw. Feld verbunden. Hätte es ein besseres Vorgehen hierfür gegeben - bin noch recht neu hier bei OSM...
kartler175 (2021-01-27 14:06:06+00:00): Der gesamte way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88106346 war vor deiner Bearbeitung ca. 10-15 m wieter nördlich: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12QH
GeoAgenten (2021-01-27 15:12:47+00:00): Wow, das war definitiv ein Versehen - sorry und vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis! Habe die vorherige Position des way wiederhergestellt und werde künftig komplexere Änderungen nicht mehr mit Go Map! sondern am Rechner durchführen :-|
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:52:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:24:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:45:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al