piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freeExec (2018-03-19 13:08:30+00:00): Почитайте вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type%3Dcommunication
В противном случае ваше внесённые данные бесполезны.
Palolo (2023-01-06 16:09:59+00:00): Thank you for adding this shop to OSM. Do you have a more accurate location? There doesn't appear to be a building at this location.
naoliv (2018-11-25 21:32:05+00:00): Lucas, cuidado pra colocar barreira dessa forma que ela acaba impedindo o roteamento nas vias.
Lucas Leal (2018-11-27 08:55:23+00:00): Bom dia, em que local especifico ? Se for na barragem é proposital, o trânsito de veículos foi fechado por lá e desviado pelo novo caminho.
naoliv (2018-11-27 11:31:21+00:00): O trânsito que passa por esse caminho você diz? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169465106
Se for tem outras maneiras de representar que não pode haver tráfego ali.
Lucas Leal (2018-11-29 05:49:44+00:00): Esse mesmo, na verdade o trecho onde a circulação foi interrompida vai de uma rotatória a outra cruzando por toda extensão da barragem.
Lucas Leal (2018-11-29 05:53:08+00:00): Vale citar que no lado paulista existe um posto policial logo no inicio do caminho, passou a ser usado como deposito da PRF e o acesso é restrito a membros da policia e funcionários da CESP.
oba510 (2018-05-20 04:42:28+00:00): Hey, you deleted almost 1600 highway=service tags in just this one changeset. I don't have the time or energy to check every one, but almost all of the ones I looked at seem like perfectly valid parking aisles which should not have been changed. Can you fix this please?.
Adamant1 (2018-05-20 09:38:03+00:00): Looks like this user ran rickshaw over the whole area for some reason. It seems kind of weird since they are part of a GIS team, whatever that means. Hopefully they are causing havoc now though. If you see them do any more problematic edits id report them to SomeoneElse and I will do the same. Then he can get them to stop.
fluffy_unicorn (2018-05-20 10:33:04+00:00): Dear oba510 and Adamant1, thank you for paying your attention to this issue. Please note, that I was not deleting highway=service tags, but rather service=parking_aisle. The reason for this consist in improving road connectivity with the purpose of navigation. First, some of these roads from which tag service=parking_aisle was deleted, in fact, do not qualify as such (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482897411 - not parking aisle but a parking entry, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484653753 - functions as transit). Second, the segments of roads from which the tag service=parking_aisle was deleted carry out several functions, namely they can act as a passage through the parking area and/or serve to connect different parts of big parking lots together. I would like to suggest that this approach to mapping of parking areas is credible since it allows to improve visual perception of a map and to navigate better through big parkings of shopping centers or malls. What concerns small parking areas (that contain only one way), then due to the hierarchical significance of the tags highway=service and service=parking_aisle it is more appropriate to use higher standing tag highway=service since the primer function of the way in such areas would be to reach POI, whereas parking is of secondary importance. In case, if you have other questions do not hesitate to contact me. Kind regards.
Adamant1 (2018-05-20 11:20:37+00:00): Fluffy Unicorn, I don't see how deleting the parking_aisle tag would improve navigation. If anything it makes it worse because there are many different kinds of service roads and therefore leaving the general tag without the sub tag makes it impossible to differentiate. 
Also, although yes some parking aisles act as through roads, that does not make them any more or less one. per the wiki page on parking "The main way(s) on the parking lot, for entering and connecting multiple parking_aisle, should be mapped with highway=service, only," Also "A parking aisle is a subordinated way in a parking lot between rows of parking spaces that vehicles use to drive into and out of the spaces." I don't see your definition of parking aisles not connecting to other things being in there. 
Further, although it might improve visual perception to make parking aisles just service roads, A. We are not suppose to be mapping for the renderer B. That could possibly only apply to this map because other service that use OSM might show might show the parking aisle tag completely different compared to just service roads. So your essentially screwing up other maps by changing them C. Ultimately if you have an issue with how something looks on the map, or you disagree with its definition, you should bring it up either at the github or wiki pages so the community can change it if need be. Instead of altering 1600 roads on your own, based only on what you think is best. 
Id also that personally I think parking aisles and driveways look better on the map than just service roads because the difference helps me to spot check where parking lots and major retail areas are. So its really subjective. I did actually put in a github request for them to improved a while back, although I can't remember how that went or what the proposed improved was, but like I said that's always an option you can use. 
Finally, id add that if anything its pointless for you to make the call and change things simply because sub tagging of service roads is pretty standard practice. Therefore, any road you alter will just get changed back by me, oba510, or anyone else for that matter. As is evidenced by a lot of places that I have checked where changed things that people put notes etc asking for the tag to put back. I guess its your time to waste if you want, but it does kind then make it on us to do more unnecessary work cleaning things up after. Not to mention there's the time the original mappers spent sub tagging everything to consider also. 
Anyway, thanks for reading. I appreciate that you are open to dialog and suggestion on the subject. Like I said already, if you have a serious issue parking_aisles feel free to bring them up in the wiki and carto github pages. Outside of that though, I don't think its generally good practice to create our own definitions and to relabel a mass amount of things based on them. There's a lot of things id like to see done differently here, but I don't just try and create my own side map off this one. But anyway, I'm just repeating myself now. So I'll stop and get back to mapping :)
Adamant1 (2018-05-20 11:46:52+00:00): Also Id note the definition win highway=service by itself, particularly this part "Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc, this is also commonly used for access to parking, driveways, and alleys" Note the world TO, not THROUGH or IN (bold added because I can't underline). In essence it stops being a more general "service road" when it goes through the parking areas and becomes a more specific "parking aisle." Therefore, not adding the sub tag doesn't work in those situations because it is no longer a service road because it is not providing the service of getting the person TO the place, in this case parking, anymore. Note also, it mentions "for access to alleys," notice the "access to" here. It would not be correct to remove the alley sub tag label from a service road anymore than it is to do it to a parking aisle, because it would no longer be an alley. Instead it would be the road providing access to one. Even if alleys might not "look right" or go through to other roads, giving them the sub tag is still correct tagging. I think the same applies for parking aisles.
*Martin* (2018-11-30 07:35:46+00:00): Ahoj. Asi nedopatrenim si zmenil obrovsku oblast na residential zonu. Prosim pred uploadom si 2x prekontroluj zmeny aby sa tomu v buducnosti predislo. Dakujem. https://ibb.co/jDj6jcM
*Martin* (2018-11-30 07:36:49+00:00): Prepac, chyba je v inom changesete :-)
BeKri (2018-03-17 17:09:24+00:00): Servus,
irgendwie ist es Dir (wohl unbeabsichtigt) gelungen, den Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/413079153
in die Landschaft zu verschieben.
Kannst Du das zurückschieben ? Danke !
mapperfox (2018-03-17 19:40:34+00:00): Hi,
danke für die Info. Wie auch immer das passiert ist... Sollte jetzt aber wieder behoben sein.
Hab den Punkt so gut wie möglich wieder an die originale stelle verschoben.
eggie (2018-03-17 08:37:38+00:00): Hi.. and house-nr 2? You deleted that nr 2. 
Most of these addresses lay on top of each other.
eggie (2018-03-17 09:44:26+00:00): Къде е номер 2 сега?
Claudius Henrichs (2018-03-17 08:23:12+00:00): Source for this changeset wasn't "Local survey", but DigitalGlobe imagery
stenive (2018-03-17 08:42:48+00:00): See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:SHM_color
eggie (2018-04-04 21:14:59+00:00): Hoi BikePC,

Kun je eens kijken, want een nieuwe mapper heeft hier van alles veranderd en het opengezet voor motor_vehicle?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57811344#map=18/51.94376/4.35797

Groet,
Eggie
BikePC (2018-05-12 19:42:47+00:00): Na survey vandaag: Er zijn nieuwe borden geplaatst en neem aan dat de situatie nu definitief is. Vanaf de zuidkant staan er geen verkeersborden, behalve max. 30km. Naam is Cricketweg. Een stuk verderop wordt het fietspad (bord G11) met naam Cricketpad. G11 staat ook aan de oostkant van de A4 bij de diverse fietspaden aldaar. Vlak voor de oversteek over de A4 splitst een serviceweg af met afgesloten hek verderop. Geen verkeersborden. Mijn conclusie derhalve: het is een gewone 'unclassified' weg zonder restricties voor auto's, etc. totdat het een fietspad wordt. Alle beperkende tags eraf gehaald en alleen op het stuk fietspad aangegeven dat dit toegestaan is voor 'emergency' (overbodig?), ondanks dat er geen bord staat.
PS. over 'unclassified' of 'residential' kun je nog discussieren, maar de andere wegen in de omgeving zijn ook 'unclassified', dus omwille van de uniformiteit daarvoor gekozen.
eggie (2018-05-12 20:42:29+00:00): Oke.. bedankt
demon_box (2018-03-17 16:24:20+00:00): ciao, questo

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5484114523

più che un access=no sarà un access=private perchè di sicuro c'è qualcuno che può accedervi
gormo (2018-03-20 15:51:15+00:00): Kennst Du die aktuelle Situation der Wege und des Lawinenschadens? Kann man da was neuzeichnen?
demon_box (2018-03-17 16:37:50+00:00): ciao, quando disegni gli edifci, appena hai finito di tracciarlo e ce l'hai ancora selezionato premi il tasto scorciatoia "s" e ortogonalizzi la forma, questo perchè quasi sempre gli edifici hanno forme ad angoli retti, se invece non è così ovviamente non devi ortogonalizzare.
Marmo4D (2018-07-14 11:12:08+00:00): Hallo geozeisig,
hast du möglicherweise die 2. Relation dieses Änderungssatzes (Rel. 8120952, type=Site fehlt) versehentlich erzeugt? Das einzige Mitglied, der Parkplatz, ist recht neu und es ist kein Anzeichen von Denkmalschutz zu erkennen.
Gruß, Marmo4D
literan (2018-05-09 21:13:35+00:00): и зачем вы эту дорогу в строящуюся превратили? Не надо сочинять: планы по ее строительству - после 2022. Откачу.
Jakka (2018-03-18 13:04:00+00:00): Is the access private the correct choise ?
Is the Rue Gustave Dequenne propertie of the garage do not think ....
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=private?uselang=nl
verdom23 (2018-03-18 17:23:33+00:00): The road is limited by a signal C3 except local circulation. I have change the tag access in yes.
Jakka (2018-03-18 19:35:52+00:00): Perhaps this can help see sign C3
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium
hackthemap (2021-09-30 19:57:00+00:00): Hi :)
Danke für deine Eintragungen.
Es geht um folgendes Objekt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570439408
Der level tag bei tunnel=culvert sollte wahrscheinlich layer sein oder?
Siehe hier zum layer Tag bei tunnel: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
Der layer tag ist normalerweise nur für Stockwerke innerhalb von Gebäuden

VG
hackthemap
Protoxenus (2021-10-01 06:55:59+00:00): Hallo,
ja, habe ich mich verschrieben. Danke für die Korrektur.
Gruß Protoxenus
demon_box (2018-03-17 16:42:37+00:00): ciao, se su un sentiero

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570434204

trovo come name=Lanzi immagino che venga chiamato "Sentiero Lanzi" e quindi lo scriverei per interno nel name
Moiman (2018-05-05 18:53:37+00:00): Moi, talot olisi hyvä tehdä suorakulmaisiksi.
ID editorissa se onnistuu painamalla S tai hiiren toista näppäintä painamalla ja valitsemalla vakikosta "Muuta suorakulmaiseksi".

Kiitos sun hyvistä muutoksista :)
demon_box (2018-03-17 16:44:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570442359

mettiamo "name=Sentiero Gruma" che dici?
demon_box (2018-03-17 16:50:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570442359

come fa un sentiero ad essere surface=gravel con trail_visibility=no ??
CAI Salò (2018-03-17 18:00:58+00:00): Si certo
CAI Salò (2018-03-17 18:03:06+00:00): mah! Mi sarà sfuggito
demon_box (2018-03-17 16:53:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570445126

hai mappato un pezzo di casa sopra la strada....!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-03-30 15:08:13+00:00): Você deletou as vias que estavam aqui. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286195225

Porque?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-04-13 13:39:22+00:00): Como você não respondeu, vou reverter essa edição. Pois você deletou vias além da ferrovia.
demon_box (2018-03-17 17:00:15+00:00): ...e dài con la fontana parte della relazione Sentiero delle Creste, NON SI FA!!!! perchè continui?
non si mettono oggetti ed edifici nelle relazioni dei sentieri
CAI Salò (2018-03-17 18:04:32+00:00): Azz!
GOwin (2018-03-19 08:03:32+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

I've been wondering about your #CTVS hashtag in your changeset comments. Do you mind pointing out any additional information about this effort? Or, how do I get in touch with your project leader?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57264009
dgitto (2018-03-17 12:04:01+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2018-03-17 12:08:44+00:00): ho modificato il municipio, mettendo website e numero di telefono. bisogna mapparlo con amenity=townhall. e di solito è meglio renderlo come nodo. Il palazzo per esempio potrebbe avere un nome suo
dgitto (2018-03-17 12:09:21+00:00): se sei del posto, considera che in questo comune mancano tantissimi nomi delle strade
dgitto (2018-03-17 12:12:15+00:00): ma poi il municipio è davvero la? o è in piazza municipio?
Marco8288 (2018-03-17 12:30:40+00:00): Il municipio in passato era in piazza municipio,poi per lavori è stato spostato in attesa di ritornare dov'è sempre stato.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Viajero Perdido (2019-11-27 00:15:14+00:00): Hi Rps333.

Weird, isn't it?  The name of the lake you added here (which is correct according to CanVec, a source I actually trust for names) doesn't match the name of the provincial park surrounding it - which I added straight from the provincial source.

You probably wondered the same thing.  Anyway, no action required, except maybe a little head-shaking.  (I noticed this while map-surfing instead of doing something useful.)  :)
Rps333 (2019-11-27 13:14:33+00:00): All good. I use to camp around here 20 years ago. Feel free to adjust as required.
Cheers
J
eggie (2018-03-17 11:39:18+00:00): Waarschuwing... Realiseer je dat elke edit daadwerkelijk op de kaart komt. ik zet je edits terug. Wat was je bedoeling.
\
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-17 11:46:59+00:00): reverted by changeset 57265011
Alecs01 (2018-03-17 11:42:03+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto in OpenStreetMap, il seminario è già mappato, ci vorrebbe forse un tag adatto, ma l'area che hai aggiunto tu non è un'unico edificio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570454028
MiticoSimo (2018-03-18 10:12:58+00:00): Ciao,  è tutta l'area del seminario comprensiva del parco intorno
Alecs01 (2018-03-18 13:35:40+00:00): Ok grazie, ho tolto il tag building
dgitto (2018-05-20 05:18:56+00:00): Ciao. Non ha senso aggiungere le restrizioni di inversione a U da e verso un senso unico.
In pratica è una restrizione già implicita nel senso unico
eggie (2018-03-17 12:22:26+00:00): Waarschuwing... Realiseer je dat elke edit daadwerkelijk op de kaart komt. Wat is hier je bedoeling?

ik zet deze edit terug.

en verder
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-17 12:25:41+00:00): reverted by changeset  #57265599
Wat was je bedoeling? OSM is geen routeplanner.
eggie (2018-03-17 12:26:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2018-03-18 00:13:38+00:00): Op de brug en ten W van de brug staat ook nog Stroetendijk. Moet dat dan ook gewijzigd worden ?
dinkyboy61 (2018-03-18 08:13:45+00:00): Hallo Leo. Inderdaad. En ten oosten van de Bennevelderstraat is een onverhard stuk dat ook als Stoetendijk staat vermeld. Geen idee of dat ook verkeerd is.
Ik had geen plannen om serieus als mapper aan de gang te gaan, maar kwam deze omissie tegen bij uitzetten puzzelrit voor autoclub en dacht het 'even' aan te passen. Blijkt weer complexer dan gedacht :-) In Google Steetview kan je de straatnaambordjes Hormaatsdijk zien, aan beide zijden. Pas jij ook de door jou genoemde items aan? Mvg, Hans
Leo Slager (2018-03-18 08:29:58+00:00): Dank je voor de reactie. wijzigingaan de W  zijde is doorgevoerd.
Leo Slager (2018-03-18 08:30:48+00:00): Oost zijde vraagt nader onderzoek.
eggie (2018-03-17 12:35:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
dirigo (2018-03-17 12:50:13+00:00): okay. Mijn email adres is: Dailey.ca@icloud.com. Ik woon op Berkenbosch Blokstraat 9 sinds 1999 en ben eigenaar van Ambassade Arena Aparthotel op Berkenbosch Blokstraat 3.
dirigo (2018-03-17 12:51:14+00:00): N.B. Ik denk dat ik geregisteerd als dirigo@gmail.com. Gmail is niet meer geldig. aaahotel@gmail.com en dailey.ca@icloud.com zijn geldig.
eggie (2018-03-17 12:40:26+00:00): 
Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
NonnEmilia (2018-03-19 11:39:22+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro che piazza Fontanesi sia tutta asfaltata? Io ricordo più qualcosa tipo `paving_stones`... Buon mapping!
Hjart (2018-03-17 12:38:43+00:00): guest house ville ellers være en mere passende kategori
soelver (2018-03-17 12:40:21+00:00): Det er jo et Bed & Breakfast? Og eftersom der er en kategori der hedder det, må det vel være det mest korrekte? Eller?

Jeg er ny på kortet, men det giver da mest mening at kalde det for hvad det er? :)
Hjart (2018-03-17 12:40:58+00:00): Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house
soelver (2018-03-17 12:43:17+00:00): Ah, cool :)

Så man kan undertagge med
guest_house=bed_and_breakfast

Korrekt?
soelver (2018-03-17 12:51:37+00:00): Nå, anyway. Jeg er nødt til at arbejde :)

Du må meget gerne rette det til det mest korrekte, så skal jeg nok lade være med at ændre det (igen) ;)

Og tusind tak for hjælpen og link :)
Hjart (2018-03-17 12:54:20+00:00): Jeg gør mit bedste. Velbekomme og held og lykke med foretagendet :-)
soelver (2018-03-17 12:55:06+00:00): Tak skal du have :D
highflyer74 (2018-03-18 10:27:26+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag. Kannst Du Dir nochmal die Hausnummer 3 ansehen? Die ist doppelt vorhanden. Fehlt bei einem Haus vielleicht der Buchstabe?

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Auch möchte ich Dich zu unserem monatlichen OSM Treffen in Bremen einladen. Informationen dazu gibt es hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Veranstaltungen

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Владимир К (2018-03-20 06:48:45+00:00): Не нужно обозначать жилой комплекс как квартиру для съёма. За вами некому исправлять, к сожалению.
srflp (2018-03-18 12:02:32+00:00): cała edycja została wycofana (ewidentny wandalizm) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57288915
highflyer74 (2018-03-18 10:44:48+00:00): Kurze Frage zur Holtz GmbH: Du hast building=construction hinzugefügt. Ist das Gebäude noch nicht fertig, oder existiert es in der Form nicht mehr?
demon_box (2018-03-17 17:08:14+00:00): il nodo amenity=parking

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5484479497

come memrbo della relazione "Sentiero Cristoforo Campanardi"?

NO!
demon_box (2018-03-17 17:10:30+00:00): e poi sempre sul nodo amenity=parking, access=yes non serve a nulla, inoltre surface=paved è un po' troppo generico, che superficie è?
CAI Salò (2018-03-17 18:05:17+00:00): Ma la gente vuoi farla parcheggiare!?
CAI Salò (2018-03-17 18:06:06+00:00): sterrato, asfalto, piuttosto trascurato
demon_box (2018-03-17 19:33:58+00:00): certo che la voglio far parcheggiare ma NON devi mettere il pracheggio nella relazione perchè non centra una mazza!
il parcheggio fa parte del percorso??=NO!
Gh0stz0x (2018-03-20 12:07:31+00:00): Fustighiamo il CAI Salò! fustighiamo il CAI Salò! 😂🤣 Il parcheggio non è ancora collegato alla way... come ci entrano le macchine? Volando? I casi sono 2 o c'è una way che entra nel parcheggio o i nodi del parcheggio vanno uniti a quelli della way. Ora sono da cell e non vedo bene, ma c'è ancora il nodo? Si prega di correggere accesso parcheggio senza metterlo nella relazione... 😃
demon_box (2018-03-20 12:55:04+00:00): @Andreas Lattmann
il nodo l'ho trasformato io in un poligono e non è più nella relazione.
ciao
CAI Salò (2018-03-20 13:04:31+00:00): Calma signori!
Vi ricordo che il CAI svolge un ruolo di pubblico servizio e siamo tutti volontari. Se ci sono degli errori sono in buona fede, correggeteli. In quanto alle relazioni a mio avviso si dovrebbe riconsiderare la funzione. Per esempio un parcheggio è funzione di una strada, una fontana è funzione di un percorso, ecc. Mi permetto di osservare che in ambito logico (Quine, Wittgenstein) un concetto o è funzione di una proposizione o non esiste. La strada è la proposizione perché formata da singoli concetti in relazione tra di loro. Quindi il parcheggio è funzione di una strada o di una piazza o di un ambito. Provate a riflettere con calma.
In merito poi agli errori di ortografia mappale siate più tolleranti, altrimenti invece di far crescere la comunità OMS rischia di avvizzire.
Grazie
Corrado