piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 28460887, 28460921, 28460962, 28461111, 28996784, 29095770, 29095784, 29095822, 29096032, 29202533, 29202618, 29202714, 29202772, 29203049, 29203123, 29203646, 29203861, 29203957, 29204005, 29204042, 29204073, 29204101, 29204113, 29249016, 29249055, 29249138, 29831088, 29831458, 29880398, 30496576, 30958909, 30958956, 30958986, 30959089, 31130218, 31130278, 31130407, 31131255, 31131429, 31131547, 31132091, 31132437, 31132482, 31132629, 31132699, 31132726, 31132786, 31132823, 31181613, 31181728, 31202120, 31202146, 31202299, 31202325, 31202470, 31202999, 31205785, 31562892, 31563179, 31563324, 31563359, 31600939, 31600999, 31601022, 32119253, 32119324, 32119461, 32119837, 32119860, 32176676, 33099827, 33099967, 33100091, 33100787, 33101073, 33101146, 33101394, 33754901, 33754960, 33754981, 33754995, 33755140, 33755170, 34707254, 34707296, 34707307, 34707484, 34968317, 34968417, 34969028, 34969041, 34969177, 35036307, 35036323, 35036338, 35036350, 35036360, 35036373, 35080954, 35081060, 35172919, 35593111, 35593152, 35593451, 35593580, 35593753, 35593786, 35593868, 35593911, 37098038, 37098159, 37098320, 37270002, 37495165, 37495265, 38319250, 38588898, 38589225, 38589358, 38589666, 38589732, 38590891, 38591156, 38591246, 38591789, 38591941, 38592040, 38592186, 38827527, 38827555, 38827578, 38827663, 38913359, 39512841, 39513173, 39513192, 39996010, 39996052, 41208954, 41262279, 41462673, 41484059, 41484145, 41484187, 41973427, 42061482, 42609133, 42609177, 42661483, 42689246, 42689287, 42706588, 42706640, 42706709, 42707347, 42707565, 42707759, 42803591, 42803635, 43082882, 43083155, 43083192, 43444871, 43444886, 43445049, 43445211, 43445364, 43445448, 43445466, 43445571, 43445630, 43445720, 43445946, 43446042, 43446238, 44083389, 44664246, 44664262, 44664488, 44763340, 45781892, 45781972, 45823667, 45823751, 45823796, 45823834.
SomeoneElse (2017-03-04 09:16:16+00:00): This reverts some further edits which depended on Google-derived data reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46564425 .
mboos (2017-03-04 14:08:39+00:00): Someone had created new ways tagged as highway=cycleway where they should have tagged existing ways as cycleway=lane or created bike route relations.
flohoff (2018-11-27 12:20:02+00:00): Moin,
ich gucke gerade Adressfehler durch und habe gesehen das du bei meiner Nachbarin die Adresse wieder auf Gütersloh geändert hast.

Die grenze ist der Wald d.h. der Kalthof ist definitiv in Rheda. Ulla bekommt zwar aus Gütersloh die Müllabfuhr und ihr Telefon aber die Adresse ist Rheda-Wiedenbrück.

Wie kommst du darauf das das Gütersloh ist?

Flo
mxrev8 (2017-04-03 10:40:32+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
mxrev8 (2017-04-03 10:40:23+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
user_7622 (2017-03-04 21:38:42+00:00): Hallo!
Mit diesem changeset hast du in und um Immenstaad (automatisiert?) Adressen geändert. Aus 'Immenstaad' wurde 'Immenstaad am Bodensee', aus z.B. 'Immenstaad-Kippenhausen' (auf dem gelben Ortschild steht so weit ich mich erinnere 'Kippenhausen') wurde ebenfalls 'Immenstaad am Bodensee'. Ist dein großflächiges Vorgehen irgendwo abgesprochen oder angekündigt worden? Insbesondere auch mit Blick darauf, daß der Bürgermeister seine postalische Adresse mit 'Immenstaad' angibt (z.B. hier: http://www.immenstaad.de/index.php?id=16)
autinerd (2017-03-06 17:56:13+00:00): Hallo user_7622,
ich habe die Änderung ausgeführt, da Immenstaad am Bodensee der offizielle Name der Gemeinde ist. Entschuldige, dass ich das auf der Seite des Bürgermeisters nicht gesehen habe, hatte es sonst eigentlich immer nachgeprüft.
Immenstaad-Kippenhausen habe ich geändert, da der Ortsteil einer Stadt in addr:suburb=* gehört (das Ortsschild sagt laut https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=ED69VqupqD2pbcFndyO6pg&focus=photo "Kippenhausen, Gemeinde Immenstaad", was es als Ortsteil darstellt.

Ich kann das "Immenstaad am Bodensee" in addr:city wieder zurück in Immenstaad ändern, aber Kippenhausen gehört in addr:suburb
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-17 02:48:40+00:00): What's the source of this change, it doesn't match Bing, Mapbox or even some non-free aerial imagery very well
nibennett (2017-03-17 02:51:52+00:00): The source is the developer of the estates maps, (I'm someone who has bought a block in the estate) 
I mapped out the whole estate on the developers maps since none of the other imagery is up to date yet
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-17 03:47:56+00:00): Ah hah. Probably shouldn't go from the potentially copyrighted developer maps; but since you've got a block there you've probably surveyed it directly :)

Nice work on the detail around freeling and other areas, welcome to OSM!
nibennett (2017-03-17 04:47:08+00:00): Fair enough. Yeah I've definitely seen it all just used their map of it that they gave us to help do it when I was at the computer. 
Thanks
zors1843 (2017-03-04 09:12:57+00:00): Please do not delete private ways.  Way was tagged correctly. Thanks.
LP747 (2017-03-04 22:48:34+00:00): The GPS systems who use openstreetmaps sends me always trought this way: IMPOSSIBLE!!!! BLOCKED iii
zors1843 (2017-03-05 08:22:19+00:00): I restored the way and checked the routing :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=50.47000%2C4.90324%3B50.47032%2C4.89932#map=18/50.47037/4.90079
What app are you using ? The access=private seems to work in openstreetmap.
zors1843 (2017-03-05 08:54:08+00:00): Google on the other hand routes over this private way :-(
LP747 (2017-03-05 09:45:46+00:00): Thank You
The application is navmii
Have a nice day
LP747 (2017-03-05 09:56:56+00:00): plus
maps.me
zors1843 (2017-03-04 09:11:45+00:00): Please do not delete private ways.  Access=no was correct.
LP747 (2017-03-04 22:46:48+00:00): The GPS systems who use openstreetmaps sends me always trought this way: IMPOSSIBLE!!!! BLOCKED iii only for service ...
zors1843 (2017-03-05 08:37:52+00:00): Way restored.  Routing seems ok :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=50.46889%2C4.91314%3B50.46846%2C4.91451#map=16/50.4723/4.9113
LP747 (2017-03-05 09:47:00+00:00): Thank you
The application is "Navmii"
Have a nice day
LP747 (2017-03-05 09:57:36+00:00): Plus Maps.me and Pocket Earth
zors1843 (2017-03-05 10:15:46+00:00): All depends on the date the maps were updated.  Navmii is a private company using not exclusively openstreetmap.  Maps.me and Pocket Earth do not update their maps daily.
Apps based on google maps will have the same problem.  
Apart from that : openstreetmap is a database providing data.  We do not want to map for a particular router and/or renderer.  It's up to the commercial firms using openstreetmap data to correctly interpret the data.
In the case of the service road : a fire brigade could be using this information.  That's why we insist on incorporating this info too.
Thanks for your understanding and have a nice day too.
Georges
LP747 (2017-03-05 14:07:45+00:00): OH George
I understand
Thank You
eggie (2017-03-04 11:27:58+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
muralito (2017-03-24 18:46:05+00:00): Hi, nyuriks.

There are two elements that models a river, one relation for all ways that are waterways, and another relation to drwa the water body. See for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2730476 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2738371

What do you think? The wikipedia & wikidata tags sholud be in both of them?
Are you checking that the values are the same.in both relation?
nyuriks (2017-03-24 18:57:10+00:00): That's a good question. While my database side tells me to normalize data, and never have any dups (e.g. have a "river master relation" that includes the river names in every language, wikipedia, wikidata, and any other shared tags that apply to the whole river), I understand there are problems with many data consumers to process super relations, so data needs to be duplicated.  So I think the wp/wd tags should be on both rels (sadly), and maybe an automation rule should be set up to verify that the wikidata tag is the same.  It is not as critical to have WP tag identical - most data consumers should translate the wikipedia tag to their user's primary language using wikidata (I actually think that at some point we should get rid of wikipedia tag outright, if it represents the whole object and not a part of it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikipedia_tag_types
eggie (2017-03-04 11:27:10+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
mbethke (2018-12-15 02:27:47+00:00): Hi,
I'm currently trying to connect the fragmented road network in this area and was wondering if you remember where you got this unclassified highway from? It looks kinda suspicious, being very long and straight, crossing a river without a bridge and what looks like a military area on the southern end -- and after two years there's still no trace of it on DigitalGlobe or anywhere. I know they've been doing a lot of construction in that area but still, looks like a cat-on-keyboard mapping :)
Any idea?

cheers,
Matthias
bigalxyz123 (2018-12-15 12:20:04+00:00): Hello Matthias,

Thanks for your note. I've been back and looked at the unclassified highway that I think you were referring to.

Further north the road does a poor job of approximating a road that I can see on the ground, so I've now moved it to be more accurate.

Towards the south, I agree, it's a complete mystery - the road doesn't seem to correspond to anything at all on the ground. So I've deleted that section.

Alas I don't remember creating this section of road so I can't explain why it was done so badly! Perhaps it was indeed the cat, or maybe I did it while I was sleeping. I guess I will never know...

Hopefully it's fixed now anyway.

Regards,
Alan
mbethke (2019-01-10 12:42:48+00:00): I only just got back to this after editing about in the North for a while -- it does look much  better now, thanks! :)
For now I've just asked DigitalGlobe for an update of the aerial imagery; some of it dates to 2010 and at the development pace in this region there's not much use tracing more from it.

cheers,
Matthias
geoaria (2017-12-20 19:32:22+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز 
در دانشگاه آزاد خمینی شهر از مسیر مسکونی و جاده درجه سه استفاده کرده اید . 
در دانشگاهها و پمپ بنزین ها و ...  از جاده خدمانی service استفادهنمایید 
در ضمن مسیر های دو بانده داخل دانشگاه را با بی دقتی به صورت تک باند ترسیم کرده اید.
eggie (2017-03-04 11:22:03+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
datendelphin (2017-03-04 17:09:09+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. Wohnhäuser haben meist keinen Namen, den kannst du einfach weg lassen (leer lassen)
SHARCRASH (2017-03-13 23:11:33+00:00): Hello, 
Please, check these nodes:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4716252292
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4716252042
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4716252039
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4716252300
Nothing wrong?
That's not trail optimization, that's breaking the elements. :)
Since i don't see any deeper historic of those all the elements and you are quite new to OSM, i suspect the errors were introduced by you.
Please, correct all those nodes because like it is now those ways can't be routed anymore. And there are many more than those i listed... 

Also, since you haven't done many edits, i would recommend you to second check backwards your previous edits.

If you need any help, please let me know.
SHARCRASH (2018-07-14 10:41:15+00:00): I've done recent observations of this area and clearly you have messed up the positions of the paths... I admit there are many and it's somehow difficult to survey them all if we don't have the time but if there are hesitations, contributors shouldn't change the elements. In such complex network it's important to make things clear and right, so that people don't get mistaken or have to stop during their activity. I don't know why you had changed the paths and why you thought you were right, you hadn't even replied... Let's hope you improved your observations kills.
PeterPan99 (2020-03-22 17:46:48+00:00): I think, if I have interpreted the changesets and entity history correctly, that in this changeset, you added the tag; place=square  to Way 478400294.  
I know that it is square in shape, but are you sure that it is a "place=square", as defined in the Wiki?
"The place=square is used to map a town square or village square: a paved open public space, generally of architectural significance, surrounded by buildings in a built-up area such as a city, town or village."
Peter
poggie (2020-03-22 17:55:08+00:00): It's a square-shaped area of gravel at the junction of the paths. I think there may be an artwork of some kind at the centre but I don't recall the details. If there is a better way to tag it then so be it.
PeterPan99 (2020-03-22 20:39:13+00:00): Thank you for replying so quickly.  There is some "debate" going on at the moment on the Tagging Mailing List about the use of "place=square".  Some say that it must be near the centre of a  town, or village, paved and surrounded by buildings, some say that it must have a name, which includes the word "square", some say that it just has to be an equilateral rectangle (or nearly so).  I'll wait for the noise to die down and try to see what the consensus is.
regards,
Peter
poggie (2020-03-26 14:08:42+00:00): I've taken another look at this area. It's now paved, with seating and some beds of shrubs. Hardly unique, but I can't quickly find anything nearby mapped to this level of detail to compare.
PeterPan99 (2020-03-26 16:10:31+00:00): Thanks for coming back again.  I've had a bit of a look around, finding other instances of "place=square" across the UK.  It seems that very few fit the Wiki definition that I quoted earlier. ... and many are not square in shape, nor named "Foo Square".  So I think I'll just leave well alone for now. 
Thanks for being so willing to revisit the issue.
rab (2017-03-04 12:04:03+00:00): If a track is narrower than 1m, it should not been tagged as "highway=unclassified", Not even in Africa.
Virtugon (2017-03-04 15:44:48+00:00): Thank you for your feedback. I'll take better notice of this in the future. Still learning and trying to apply the "rules" as stated by the OSM tasking manager.
Mike Baggaley (2017-03-13 22:30:56+00:00): Hi, can you please review your change of	Southwood Road, which has a ref of B749, from secondary to tertiary. If it is the B749, it is by definition a secondary road. If it has been declassified please remove the ref, otherwise please restore the highway to secondary.

Thanks,
Mike
Martin Borsje (2017-03-14 06:06:33+00:00): Hi MIke

I restored my change, but in my perception Monktonhill Orad is the throughway and deserves a higher class than the in my view residential Southwood Rd.

But if the official classification is like that....OK

BR

Martin
eggie (2017-03-04 11:10:47+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden
eggie (2017-03-04 11:16:18+00:00): Reverted the waterponds. 
Hallo en welkom op OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken. Het is de bedoeling dat de werkelijkheid in kaart wordt gebracht. Ook een Pokemon speler kan waardevolle data inbrengen, mits deze voldoen aan de werkelijkheid. Uw edit zal gecontroleerd worden op vandalisme en zal om deze reden teruggedraaid kunnen worden.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden,
eggie (2017-03-04 11:17:03+00:00): reverted ivm pokemonedits
Alan Bragg (2017-04-17 11:36:26+00:00): The cemetery overlaps a large housing area and a lot of open land. It should be re entered if it really exists with a more detailed boundary.
archie (2017-03-04 12:41:18+00:00): Ich darf dich bitten den Unfug sein zu lassen! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
archie (2017-03-04 12:48:10+00:00): Oh, secondary language. Du hatest Recht. Tut mir leid!
Aleks-Berlin (2017-03-04 20:47:12+00:00): Ich korrigiere immer anhand des OSM-wiki, und suche Fehler via taginfo. Wobei ich mich meist auf das Format beschränke, und nicht die 2nd-language entferne (obwohl sie eine Ausnahme sein sollte), um niemanden durch Löschung seines Tags zu verärgern (ausser es ist ein offensichtlicher Tippfehler). Evtl. könnte man eine automatische Korrektur oder Warnungsmail an den Verfasser schreiben, bei typischen häufigen Fehlertypen. Kennst du dich diesbzgl. besser aus? VG, Alex
archie (2017-03-06 04:58:04+00:00): Tut mir leid, da kenne ich mich nicht besser aus. Mein urspruenglicher Einwand war vorschnell. Ich wusste bis dahin nicht, dass das Format bei der Zweitsprache von dem der Erstsprache abweicht. Ganz und gar mein Fehler. Ich bitte um Verzeihung. Danke fuer Deine Berichtigung! archie
eggie (2017-03-04 20:43:48+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
goedegazelle (2018-04-25 08:57:40+00:00): Hier is iets misgegaan: landuse=kadaster pdok 2016.
eggie (2018-04-25 09:06:35+00:00): Ja .. dat klopt niet.. zal de landuse herstellen. thanks
eggie (2018-04-25 09:10:09+00:00): fixed
Gccard (2018-06-12 16:29:26+00:00): Questa non e' Villa Anglani, potresti rimuoverla cosí inserisco la posizione corretta? grazie
eggie (2017-03-04 15:01:21+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Klopt het dat je edits in één changeset tot in Berlijn lopen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46569750#map=20/52.51294/13.38824&layers=H
Van Vliet delifrance ?

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
DD1GJ (2017-03-04 19:21:51+00:00): Hallo dtg-osm, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Leider entsprachen alle Deine Edits genau dem Muster von Neueinsteigern, die Pokémons bequem neben der Schule bzw. bei sich zuhause haben möchten. Daher wurde alles wieder gelöscht.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Wenn Du ernsthaft bei unseren anspruchsvollen Projekt mitmachen willst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Dalkvist (2017-03-04 13:50:55+00:00): Is the park new? Only farmland visible on the satellite images... or are you trying to get more pokemons to spawn?
ashlaf (2017-03-04 13:58:17+00:00): Didn't know how to classify it, either park or grass or field
Dalkvist (2017-04-12 10:18:28+00:00): If it uses to grow crops we use landuse=farmland if it is for grazing or hay it is landuse=meadow
CloCkWeRX (2017-07-19 05:40:19+00:00): The prision is available on digital globe, and appears substantially constructed now
trigpoint (2017-03-04 17:30:44+00:00): Hi, thank you for adding these footpaths, however they should not end where the gate/stile is, they need to connect to the road otherwise routers will see them as dead ends and not use them.
I have connected the footpaths to the roads.
Cheers Phil
Constable (2017-03-16 11:17:18+00:00): Ciao, visto il problema con il ponte dell'altro changeset mi sono permesso di controllare anche questo.
Lo sai che hai rimosso alcune strade agricole e sentieri con questo changeset?
Faccio riferimento alle linee rosse che puoi vedere qua http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=46570594
Capita a tutti di fare errori, a me interessa solo essere sicuro che tu li abbia rimossi perché inesistenti, non per errore.
Grazie Ciao
picchiov (2017-03-16 14:36:11+00:00): Ciao, ho rimosso quella strada perché tracciata da me 5 anni fa e ora non più esistente perché ricoperta da rovi e piante nonché chiusa al pubblico da un cancello che in precedenza era aperto.
Comunque il primo tratto della strada più a sud si tratta di una strada storica,un diverticolo della via claudia, il secondo tratto era un piccolo sentiero ricavato dagli animali su un terreno arato.
La modifica sulla strada sita nel bosco di manziana é stata corretta di traiettoria tramite traccia gpx.
Saluti,

Federico
Constable (2017-03-16 18:49:32+00:00): ok, ottimo!
eggie (2017-03-04 14:57:21+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.