piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2021-08-23 18:54:22+00:00): Tym podpowiedziom nie można ufać. Niektore są błędne. Inne należy zweryfikować.
PT-53 (2021-08-21 11:07:03+00:00): Hallo  Quocce,
ich habe die von Dir gelöschten Gebäude wieder hergestellt und als 
removed:building=yes
markiert.
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258939361/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258939352/history
Ansonsten könnte es sein, daß ein anderer Mapper die Gebäude wieder einzeichnet, da diese auf dem neuesten Luftbild noch zu sehen sind.
Grüße
eggie (2021-08-21 11:00:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
GeoidDude (2021-09-30 19:14:30+00:00): Привет RusFox,

Я обращаюсь к вам по поводу удаления trunk_links в этом наборе изменений. У нас был подобный разговор в прошлом (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86785312). Я заметил, что вы внесли аналогичные изменения в другой набор изменений (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110022960), поэтому мне интересно, есть ли новая локальная или глобальная политика в отношении полос скольжения, о которых мне следует знать? Похоже, что никаких существенных изменений в вики-странице (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link) не произошло, и я все еще вижу нарисованные барьеры на этих перекрестках на нескольких аэрофотоснимках, а также на Mapillary из год назад (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=468138951077547), что показывает, что краска в хорошем состоянии.

Спасибо,
GeoidDude
glibbertorsten (2021-08-21 22:07:42+00:00): Ich möchte sagen, das es nie genug Informationen sein können und gerade OSM dafür geliebt wird, einfach mehr zu bieten. Mit Sicherheit ist die Baustellenumfahrung mit diesem Namen in keinem amtlichen Katasteramt gelistet - na und? Es hat Mehrwert: das OSM-basierte "Blitzer.de" hat mir den Standort einer Kontrolle korrekt mit diesem Namen angegeben! Jeder weiß, was gemeint ist.
Christopher (2021-08-22 11:09:07+00:00): Ja da sind wir wieder beim Thema was sind name, note bzw. description. :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names

Missbrauche nicht den name-tag um die Baustelle zu beschreiben:
https://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2014/10/ein-paar-worte-zum-baustellenmapping/

Von der Sache her könnte man auch den Namen der Straße übernehmen (Nuthestraße), da es aktuell ja zur Straßenführung gehört.

Der von dir beschriebene Mehrwehrt wäre dann in Richtung "Mappen für den Renderer", in dem Fall "Mappen für die Apps".

Hinweis: lt. §23 StVO ist die Nutzung von Apps wie blitzer.de während der Fahrt verboten (75€ + 1 Pkt)!
glibbertorsten (2021-08-22 11:32:19+00:00): Ja super, danke für die Belehrung und das Wort zum Sonntag, war aber leider nichts neues für mich dabei. Amen.
SGorskiy (2021-08-23 03:49:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Отдельно тег города ставить не надо, это лишняя информация и она автоматически берется из покрываемой точку области города.
iWowik (2021-08-25 13:37:55+00:00): Тег города не мешает, а вот 
addr:housenumber=145А лит.Ф
заполнен не по правилам, об этом уже писал тут
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109991697
Bertrand Pa-Ro (2021-08-25 15:20:41+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for your comments.
Ok for the city, I didn't know it was added automatically — so since I came to try to correct my submission after iWowik comment, I thought it could be useful. Good to know!
So iWowik, yes, this modification is precisley a try to correct my initial submission after you commented. I submitted it through an app, OSMand, maybe that's the reason it was poorly formatted, but I don't get what's wrong. I thought it was maybe the comma who was not needed between the building number and the stair number, but it seems it's not the issue. I'm sorry it just seems I don't understand the naming rules or don't see a thing that my contribution lacks — and my russian is limited. I don't understand what I can do more now with this. I will restrain contributing in Russia! Sorry for the trouble…
Bertrand Pa-Ro (2021-08-25 15:24:47+00:00): Ooooh is it the dot yet that's too much, after the comma? "лит.Ф" is wrong and should be just "литФ"?
Frans S (2021-08-22 09:03:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Each rectangular building needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
You overlooked also a number of buildings.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor.
Most of the buildings are strickt rectangular.
 A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
When parts of a building are hidden by trees, extrapolate the rooflines rather than following the treelines.

See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg

Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/

Best regards and success with future mappings
elfenlied (2021-08-29 17:52:42+00:00): Perfektné. Vďaka. Chcel som z GPS zakresliť Kolový, ale som rád, že ma niekto predbehol :)
Mirecnet (2021-08-30 16:51:24+00:00): Nemas zac. Kreslil som spolu aj Cierny stit. Tam to bolo trocha zlozitejsie. Pol dna sme to hladali. Snat tam uz konecne nebude nikto bludit...
aceman444 (2023-03-01 22:00:17+00:00): Zdravim, ten maly ladovec https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975216818 asi bude mat inu hrubku a objem ako ten velky https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654562566 . A podla coho tento maly ladovec vobec existuje?

Na 'retaze' (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975216807) uz dnes existuje znacka (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:assisted_trail ci https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:safety_rope), ale ani v minulosti to nepatrilo do 'name'.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-18 10:15:07+00:00): Groesteen*
iriman (2021-08-22 13:54:20+00:00): سلام. این مسیر هنوز وجود خارجی ندارد و شش هفت بلوک مسکونی بر سر راه آن قرار دارد که تخریب نشده‌اند.
VictorIE (2022-02-21 11:11:45+00:00): Hi,

This looks 'confused'. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604400471
Langlaeufer (2022-03-04 23:32:50+00:00): Hallo Kevin, Fuß- und Radwege werden nicht getrennt eingezeichnet, wenn sie nicht auch baulich voneinander getrennt sind. Stattdessen nutzt man highway=path und segerated um zu zeigen ob die Wege gemeinsam genutzt oder durch getrennt sind. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren Grüße Frank
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110025639
Adam Franco (2021-09-15 18:35:23+00:00): Hi Alex, I just noticed that this change-set demoted Middlebury from a Town to a Village. Even though the place is referred to in Town documents as "the village" I don't think this demotion is correct due to the level of services available in the village compared to other communities. I've started a thread in the #local-us-northeast channel of the OSMUS slack to get more regional input on the town/village distinction as there is a wide difference in application across NY, VT, NH, and ME. If you'd like to join in that discussion, head here:
https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CC0LMFWBH/p1631729815087000
bartovx (2021-08-22 21:34:32+00:00): Czyli ogródki działkowe mapujemy jako Rodzinne Ogródki Działkowe, a nie RODy? To jakaś różnica?
Dawid2849 (2021-08-23 08:36:13+00:00): W OSM raczej rozwijamy skróty w 'name', a skróty trafiają do 'short_name'.
maraf24 (2021-08-23 18:50:19+00:00): Przy czym ROD nie jest skrótem:)
Proponuję stosować wersję używaną przez dany ogród.
C2oc4 (2021-10-17 06:59:45+00:00): Kojarzę że byłą kiedyś mówa o rozwijaniu skrótu fakt dotyczyło się to ulic ale czy nie powinno wszędzie ?
maraf24 (2021-10-17 17:44:32+00:00): ROD to akronim, nie skrót. Pełną wersję należy dać jeśli taka jest w użyciu - często nazwa jest na bramie widoczna.
C2oc4 (2021-11-07 07:24:14+00:00): Kurcze i tutaj mamy wg mnie paradoks bo często gęsto jest używana taka i taka nazwa.
SekeRob (2021-08-22 09:45:54+00:00): Hi

Since you are the author of the Latest 'new' key report, would there be the possibility to run such a report at a user level i.e. pour moi? I'd be eradicating my own typos and strays without delay (fixing my caused troubles I do as a daily chore as reported by Osmose and Neis, can't stand them lingering).

cheers
mueschel (2021-08-22 10:05:25+00:00): Unfortunately, no. I just read the list of tags from Taginfo which doesn't contain this information.
You could run your own query in Overpass to get a list of keys on objects you are the last editor of, and make a diff between lists generated at different times:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1axa
SekeRob (2021-08-22 10:19:03+00:00): That report already is a great start, it turns scanning for key/value pollution into a jiffy. A differential report would put the icing on the cake i.e. the short list.

Many thanks
SekeRob (2021-08-22 10:32:18+00:00): Alright, so I put the area in view I worked on this morning and ran your script. short list, manageable, now permanent bookmark and pinned for quick access.

Have a great day.
5m4u9 (2021-08-21 22:58:47+00:00): OMG! thanks
SekeRob (2022-01-27 10:33:22+00:00): Hi,

when you map buildings that share walls you need to connect the white nodes at the corner so the turn grey. Else OSM thinks one building is on top of the other but does not know which.

ciao
gpserror (2021-08-28 23:48:35+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding the new YMCA.

If you up to it, you could change the background to Maxar Standard Edition (click on the layered squares on the right hand side in iD, scroll until you see Maxar Imagery and click it, then close the pull out tab so you can see the map) and get a better look at the building.
Also might want to check for typos in the name, I know I've mistyped a lot of names oops!
marc__marc (2024-09-21 23:05:54+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27248235/history
v #11
on ne peux pas se garer ou on peux se garer sur la route ?
Cordialement,
Marc
eggie (2021-08-21 13:33:20+00:00): Beste Paul,

Probeer de paden los te houden van de landuse.
Wanneer je de linker alttoets gebruikt plakt er niets vast.

Ik heb het pad losgemaakt.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110027915
MVG
eggie
muralito (2021-08-21 22:33:36+00:00): Hola. Por favor no dupliques mas las vias cuando no hay separacion de calzadas. Gracias.
rab (2021-08-21 14:02:16+00:00): Hello Choolwe Hamama,
1x "path"
1x "track"(version 3) 
2x "residential"
1x "road"
do you roll the dice to determine the classification of highways?
Choolwe Hamama (2021-08-21 15:02:35+00:00): Hello!
Thank you for the correction, I will make the necessary correction.
But I would appreciate if you just urged me to make corrections, the "do you roll the dice to determine...."  part is quite inappropriate. 
Be careful with the words or statements you use because not everyone is a pro when it comes to mapping, I just started mapping a month ago and am am learning everyday. Some people may take strong exception for some statements like this and you don't want to discourage any beginner mapper out here. And I believe this is in the code of conduct for HOT, take note please!
otherwise I appreciate your correction and you welcome to correct me whenever am wrong. I will make the necessary adjustments to avoid the same mistakes.
Kind regards!
rab (2021-08-21 16:11:25+00:00): 
Sorry for ruining your day.
My intention was to at least provoke a reaction. The highways I commented about yesterday are still on the map.
So back to the facts. Your road mapping seem pretty illogical to me. For example: a "highway=residential" without a connection to an equivalent or higher level road network makes no sense. If you trace every visible road in this area, the result would be a completely unreadable map. Since no one is mapping next to you, all new roads should be mapped from end to end. You should complain to your project manager for giving you unclear instructions. Please read the comments to #10091 (https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/10091) to understand what kind of mapping is really intended here. Also, please note that the area you are working on was mapped recently with project #5842, which is still active. So you should focus more on correcting the existing data.  There are plenty of roads mapped, which do not appear in the more current imagery anymore.
eggie (2021-08-21 13:51:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
borishag (2021-10-28 12:27:02+00:00): Hallo,
Je hebt een bestaande winkel (Prijsmepper) verwijderd uit een BAG node. Deze is inmiddels terug gezet
snoozingnewt (2021-08-22 17:27:00+00:00): Is the government office really named "aaaaaaaaa"?
Mammi71 (2022-09-15 08:14:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24684522

Besteht diese Baustellensperrung noch?
XnS (2022-09-15 10:03:24+00:00): No
Julind (2021-08-21 14:09:55+00:00): Dies ist eine empfindliche Änderungen, so wenn ich irgend einen Tag falsch gesetzt habe,  bitte ich um Entschuldigung.
eggie (2021-08-21 14:44:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-01 23:27:24+00:00): "q" can be used to square the buildings...
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-01 23:38:45+00:00): Buildings are extremely low quality and not squared.  Reverted in part or in whole in changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398207

User was blocked for making similar edits:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5531
Langlaeufer (2022-03-04 23:10:07+00:00): Hallo Kevin,

Fuß- und Radwege werden nicht getrennt eingezeichnet, wenn sie nicht auch baulich voneinander getrennt sind. Stattdessen nutzt man highway=path und segerated um zu zeigen ob die Wege gemeinsam genutzt oder durch getrennt sind. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Grüße
Frank
eggie (2021-08-21 14:48:50+00:00): Dag Use..

Bij mijn weten is hier geen ziekenhuis.
Beter de vermeldingen hospital verwijderen

Kijk steeds in de wiki hoe te taggen. 

Kijk even onder heathcare

healthcare=physiotherapist

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare

Niet alle tagging levert een symbool op. 
Een ziekenhuis zet gebruikers op het verkeerde been.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-21 16:48:36+00:00): hospital verwijderd.. aanpast zie boven..
MVG
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-01 23:38:48+00:00): Buildings are extremely low quality and not squared.  Reverted in part or in whole in changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398207

User was blocked for making similar edits:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5531
HirschKauz (2021-08-22 12:15:10+00:00): Hi BerndWalt. Kurze Frage: sind die kompletten Gebäude tatsächlich weg? Oder ist eventuell nur die Funktion geändert?.  Viele Grüße, HirschKauz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110030746
BerndWalt (2021-08-22 17:29:39+00:00): Es waren temporäre Bauten die seit über einem Jahr nicht mehr existieren. Inzwischen ist dort ein Spielplatz und eine Grünanlage. Die Gebäude sind vollständig weg. Viele Grüße Bernd
HirschKauz (2021-08-22 18:29:51+00:00): Alles klar - vielen Dank - happy mapping, HirschKauz
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-01 23:38:54+00:00): Buildings are extremely low quality and not squared.  Reverted in part or in whole in changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134398207

User was blocked for making similar edits:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5531
tszym (2021-08-22 12:03:21+00:00): Hi Kalepom,
This changeset seems to be about more than advertising (you also modified and deleted some roads). Could you please make sure this was on purpose, and in the future, make sure you split your edits in smaller changesets so they are easier to review?

Please also use the validator of your editor before uploading to help you catch easy issues. There are two nodes with same coordinates on a bus shelter and you used support:pole on some nodes, but this is not a supported value and should be support=pole instead.
Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110031158
trial (2022-03-23 20:20:23+00:00): construit et mis à jour. Pourquoi ne metre que ces des parcelles dont une seule est actuellement résidentielle en résidentiel ? C'est presque tout le coin qui est devenu résidentiel.
trial (2022-03-23 20:20:46+00:00): des => deux
maraf24 (2021-08-23 19:00:29+00:00): Pozmieniałeś tutaj ścieżki w lesie oznaczona jako ściezki (highway=path) na drogi dla pieszych (highway=footway).
Po co? Teraz rowerem się tam nie da jechać.
SomeoneElse (2021-09-04 10:28:15+00:00): Hello archicheon,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
Can you explain what the source of your change is here?  
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-09-04 10:29:16+00:00): 안녕하세요 아키천입니다.
여기 OSM 데이터 워킹 그룹의 Andy가 있습니다.
여기에 변경의 원인이 무엇인지 설명할 수 있습니까?
친애하는,
앤디
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-21 15:20:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 99092967.
philippec (2021-08-21 16:06:06+00:00): Duffel station trap spoorondergang.
Ik zou de hellingsgraad erbij zetten (smartphone) en of er een fietsgoot is.
En natuurlijk een foto van vanonder.
tszym (2021-08-22 11:05:25+00:00): Hi, your changeset boundaries are including several countries, this is a huge one.
Please try to group and submit your edits to smaller geographic areas. That way it makes it easier for others to understand what you are editing and correct any potentially issues. And it won't notify people who monitor the map in unrelated areas about your changes.
Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110031934
datendelphin (2021-09-04 14:38:48+00:00): Liebe Kai Pankrath, wie kommst du darauf, *sieben* tags für den operator des Briefeinwurfs zu verwenden? Ich hab das jetzt schon an verschiedenen Stellen von dir so gesehen. Etwas Redundanz schadet ja nicht, aber das ist doch Trolling? 
beste Grüsse 
Michael
StefanHRT (2021-08-26 05:04:26+00:00): Moin, Lage und Fußwege sind nach Sichtung vor Ort (Befahrung mit Fahrrad und GPS) angepasst. Der Rest kann erst richtig erfolgen,wenn es aktuelle Luftbilder gibt. VG
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-21 18:54:35+00:00): Dzięki!
carstenhag (2021-08-21 15:30:55+00:00): Not a survey, the source is https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2723639
Richard (2021-08-21 16:02:06+00:00): Also, NCN 4 via Easter Compton has been de-signed and removed from the network (from survey)
DaveF (2021-08-21 19:16:03+00:00): Why have you changed it from classified to a cycleway?

What's been "removed"
Richard (2021-08-21 19:21:00+00:00): Because it's like that in reality - I cycled there last week.

The junction has been remodelled and now has a dedicated cycleway arm (with signs and everything). It's a really weird layout for a rural area but there you go.

The NCN signs have been removed from the relevant sections of road.
DaveF (2021-08-24 15:50:32+00:00): Thanks

The weirdness of spending money on such a quiet junction is why I queried it. Have they dug up tarmac or added barriers? Seems to only restrict the farmer, unless rubbish sat-nats think the motorway junction is accessible.

Did you use this path?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964692865

The last time I went there it was a construction site & unsure if it's the correct layout.
Richard (2021-08-24 15:53:35+00:00): It's a very strange thing. There was some discussion on the Cycling UK forum and no one there understands it either.

I didn't use that path I'm afraid - I was going from Easter Compton to Hollywood Lane.
DaveF (2021-08-24 17:09:27+00:00): Good lord, just seen the photos & it's worse than I imagined. What a complete waste of money.
bradrh (2021-08-22 20:43:25+00:00): I think it's unfortunate that you took the acronym BLM out of the name, and operator fields.   It was added to operator by me, I'm local to that area, It was added to the the name by another westerner.   You've stomped on the tags from locals and added fluff based on some new wiki page that hasn't been approved or voted on and is an over-complicated convoluted mess.
ElliottPlack (2021-08-22 20:52:40+00:00): Hi there. I made the update at the request of the DWG on OSMUS slack after they reverted it from someone that’d deleted the whole thing. Thought I was doing you a favor.

As for the tagging, it is a standard based on considerable discussion on slack, the mailing lists, and amongst people that are interested in such things. Please join us.

You’re welcome to change the name to something locals agree on. I took the name from the official source PADUS which is probably where you got the boundaries from. By OSM standards we shouldn’t put acronyms or abbreviations in names, which is why I removed it. Also, names aren’t descriptions, the two part name seems like a descriptive designation but again, I’m not a local. 
Cheers
ElliottPlack (2021-08-22 20:55:10+00:00): Read more: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions
bradrh (2021-08-22 23:17:16+00:00): Andy T did me a favor by reverting the deletion.  I read the osm us & osm tagging list regularly.  There was not considerable discussion on either of those forums.  There are too many scattered OSM forums to keep up with.  Sorry to be cranky, but I see too much being messed up by remote & satellite mappers .
ElliottPlack (2021-08-23 13:13:00+00:00): You do sound cranky, but I get it! I have been mapping and importing protected areas on the east coast for years and am frustrated by what I call "landuse mappers" that have throwaway accounts and swoop in to untag major land reservations I've spent hours working on. I get it, seriously! That is why I support the well documented US PL Tagging schema, in defense of those edits. The landuse mappers are often of a different worldview where parks and nature reserves are not massive 10K+ acre areas but rather tiny parks in urban centers (or should I say 'centre'). The standard is not convoluted, it considers all of what OSM has to offer, and various ways people tag these federal places all over the US. Please join us in discussing this further. Most of this conversation happens in the #protectedlands channel in OSM US Slack. I stopped following the mailing lists in the 2014 ish era but stay heavily involved in the project through Slack, discord, and other outlets. There are a lot of enlightened people working on these problems.

Speaking of Slack, the way I found myself here in Colorado was via a request Andy Townsend posted on the Slack (see below). 

Andy Townsend  1 day ago
Following a DWG request I've reverted http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=9197995 .  If there's a more that needs changing there https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99092967 may be the place to start. (edited) 

elliottplack:maryland:  1 day ago
on it

elliottplack:maryland:  1 day ago
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9197995 tagged in accordance with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands#Bureau_of_Land_Management

Andy Townsend  1 day ago
It'd probably be worth pointing JOSM's validator at it as I suspect that might be some multipolygon issues that need looking at.

elliottplack:maryland:  1 day ago
Yes I noticed some of those. I’m not sure how to fix. It is the issues when two right angle corners share a node.
ElliottPlack (2021-08-23 13:17:11+00:00): Now, speaking of this edit, I think it would be fine to make the name "Bureau of Land Management - San Luis Field Office" though it is a mouthful. However, I must strongly advise against abbreviating the name. That is likely how "Tom" found this area in order to delete it. Acronyms run against OSM standard practices because a computer algorithm can easily abbreviate something, but abbreviations are hard.
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-23 13:26:06+00:00): This seems a little strange to me to name BLM lands as a "field office"?  Is that actually the name of the area or just the name of which office is responsible for it?