piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
drkt (2021-10-04 15:52:13+00:00): Was this way change intentional?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27697609
starseeker9 (2021-10-04 15:59:26+00:00): No, it wasn't
drkt (2021-10-04 16:44:48+00:00): I have reverted the way to it's original state. Please be more careful in the future :)
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-09-20 14:16:48+00:00): Раз уж юзер Felis Pimeja замапил все деревья по отдельности (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112409784), то, может быть, имеет смысл поменять natural=wood на natural=sand? 
Там везде sand, конечно... Просто сейчас, глядя на карту, можно подумать, что там лес. Но леса нет, зато песка навалом 8)
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
brianboru (2022-01-15 14:41:55+00:00): Adding grass areas to landuse=park is redundant, default is that parks are covered in grass,  most used compliant additional overlays in parks are natural=wood, leisure=playground, leisure=pitch, leisure=playground
sembelst134 (2026-05-17 15:11:38+00:00): Hallo, was hat es den mit den tourism=alpine_hut auf sich?
Die Definition lautet: ein Stützpunkt (in den Bergen) oder in ABGELEGENEN Regionen, welcher Unterkunft UND Verpflegung bietet
Ich bezweifle, dass das in irgendeiner Art stimmt. Also wenn du Quellen dafür lieferst, kann man sicher bessere Tags finden, andernfalls würde ich die nodes zeitnah löschen.
streckenkundler (2026-05-17 16:15:35+00:00): Guten Abend,

...da gibt es durch Zufall auch gerade aktuell einen Beitragsfaden im Forum (da aber Thüringen): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/alpine-hut-im-thuringer-wald/143827/17

...zur Disskussion herzlich eingeladen.

streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2026-05-17 16:17:08+00:00): @Andre paulick: es wir bestimmt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dchalet gemeint sein.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
Anazaar (2021-11-16 10:00:01+00:00): Witam :-) ścieżkę do słynnego "odwodnienia" i dalej zmieniłeś na drogę, a raczej niczym tam nie przejedziesz ;-) Wystające szpile od pokładów i jej szerokość to uniemożliwia :-) Pozdrawiam
Anazaar (2021-11-16 10:13:23+00:00): Jeśli były też inne takie zamiany  patch na track to je jeszcze raz zweryfikuj :-) puki to świeży temat :-)
Anazaar (2021-11-16 13:03:40+00:00): TRACK to droga przejezdna choćby tylko dla traktora lub off-road 4x4 :-) PATCH można otagować tylko dla pieszych lub pieszych i rowerów itp. Na tej ścieżce nawet rower bardzo łatwo rozwalić o te wystające z podkładów śruby.
km2bp (2021-11-24 11:40:33+00:00): Wszystko co w terenie ma 2 ślady choćby to była droga przejezdna dla kłada  oznaczam jak droga leśna .  Jeśli chcesz  to zmień ponownie na ścieżkę  i cicho sza  to odwodnienie wcale nie jest słynne.   https://youtu.be/gL9cuMhoNFA Ja pod swymi filmikami na YouTube podaję link do mapki ale i tak większość ludzi nie ma w zwyczaju czytać opisów pod filmami.  A posiadając link do mapy  z samego  układu ścieżek jak po nitce do kłębka można sobie wydedukować gdzie jest wejście. Informacja ta jest dla ludzi sprytnych a nie dla niezaradnych którzy mogli by sprowadzić problemy w postaci zamknięcia tej niesamowitej atrakcji turystycznej.
Alex_457 (2021-10-03 21:31:45+00:00): source=survey
do not bring quebec into this (2021-10-18 21:04:03+00:00): i think it would be good also to map the walkways within the ecology garden!
voltairovicz (2021-10-03 21:49:26+00:00): Ale nie trzeba było korzystać z revertera, wciaz trasa miała tag access=no, czyli żadna nawigacja nie poprowadzi przez te drogę, te zmiany były jedynie przygotowaniem tagów przed otwarciem, poza tym wprowadziłem tam aktualizację jak data otwarcia, liczba lanes czy surface, destination, to było ponad pół godziny mojego czasu
szalona_entropia (2021-10-03 22:27:42+00:00): A to przepraszam, zbyt pobieżnie spojrzałem.
Ale i tak z niektórymi zmianami należy się wstrzymać do faktycznego otwarcia drogi
szalona_entropia (2021-10-03 22:30:51+00:00): To wtedy nikt nie będzie wpadał na pomysł żeby to revertować
voltairovicz (2021-10-03 22:55:24+00:00): Spoczko, nic się nie stało ostatecznie ;)
Thierry1030 (2022-07-19 20:50:04+00:00): Dag Tom,
Eerst en vooral, dank voor het nog steeds zeer intensief mappen!
Ik heb persoonlijk al veel gehad aan de data die je toegevoegd hebt!
Een aantal zaken die mij en andere mappers ondertussen opgevallen zijn: je voegt heel wat info toe bij het veld "name" waar dit eigenlijk niet thuishoort.
"Alain Vanstalle" is de vermoedelijke naam van de persoon die hier woont, dit is privacy gevoelige informatie en hoort niet thuis in OSM.
Meer info hierover vind je in de wiki -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Is het mogelijk om dit aan te passen?
Ik zal een gelijkaardige comment ook toevoegen bij andere objecten.
Als je nog vragen hebt nodig ik je vriendelijk uit in de chat van OSM BE -> https://matrix.to/#/#osmbe:matrix.org
Vriendelijke groet!
Thierry
Tom Ameye (2022-07-19 22:04:21+00:00): Dag Thierry,
Het gaat hier om de Vanstalle vijvers. Dat is algemeen gekend in Grimbergen en ook terug te vinden op het internet (winkel voor tropische vissen, maar die is wel gestopt). Vandaar dat ik het toevoegde. Mijn inschatting op het ogenblik dat ik dit toevoegde was dat dit dus niet privacy gevoelig is, anders had ik het uiteraard niet toegevoegd, maar ik zal het aanpassen.
mvg
Tom Ameye
Thierry1030 (2022-07-20 08:46:07+00:00): Dag Tom,
Die info rond de Vanstalle vijvers hoort wel degelijk thuis in OSM. 
Ik zie dat je de naam nu toegevoegd hebt aan één van de vijvers en dat is prima voor mij.
Wat die voormalige winkel voor tropische vissen betreft, ik heb daar ook iets over teruggevonden.
Zoiets kan ook toegevoegd worden. Daar bestaan speciale lifecycle-tags voor. Mer info hierover -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
SomeoneElse (2021-10-04 16:42:18+00:00): No net change to Ireland https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3070643 here - see http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3070643 .  I just selected it by accident and then deselected it.
tekim (2021-10-08 17:00:44+00:00): These mechanical edits should be discussed on the official OSM mailing list.
KingKull2112 (2021-10-04 23:02:04+00:00): This already exists and this marker is in the incorrect place
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-04 19:47:36+00:00): Note that in this case adding wikidata/wikipedia tags was not needed - and even a bit wrong

brand:wikidata and brand:wikipedia were already present

BTW, is it something that you did manually? Or is it proposed by gnome-maps editor itself?
Feral2k (2021-10-19 15:46:47+00:00): Ah, understood. This was part of gnome-maps editor for the Wikipedia portion, which was blank. I assumed that that it was useful information to add, but it looks like gnome-maps is not adding it properly. I'll refrain from using that field
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-19 21:49:32+00:00): If gnome-maps is not displaying brand:wikidata and brand:wikipedia fields then

- it may be a good idea to report problem to authors (is gnome-maps still being developed)
- limit adding Wikipedia to cases where it is specifically about given object (say, about a specific statue or specific building or specific tree - not about tree species or about a brand)
AnonymousAlligator (2022-04-27 20:45:56+00:00): Hi. I'm not sure why you say these areas were deleted without reason. They are duplicates of existing, more complete residential areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112050894
VictorIE (2021-10-05 18:04:40+00:00): Spaces like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989236874 are not car parking, they are turning circles!
b-unicycling (2021-10-05 20:27:19+00:00): But there's a car parked in it.
VictorIE (2021-10-05 20:40:53+00:00): This is Ireland, people will park anywhere. :)
Momochaps123 (2021-10-04 02:32:18+00:00): Added Photo Editing Shop
ika-chan! (2021-10-27 13:08:59+00:00): Hi, could you please explain this change?
Greg_Rose (2021-10-04 01:08:31+00:00): You could have at LEAST had the decency to warn me that we were editing in the same area! I'm tempted to revert this change since you stomped all over everything I was working on. Why shouldn't I?
Greg_Rose (2021-10-04 01:11:17+00:00): An appropriate and FRIENDLY thing to do would have been to send me a message that our changes in Michaux were conflicting once you saw the conflict errors in this changeset
Mountain Stream Flood (2021-10-04 01:43:01+00:00): Sorry, I wasn't aware you were making edits in the same area.
skquinn (2021-10-04 02:00:29+00:00): Oops, forgot web searches as source
MxxCon (2021-10-04 05:36:51+00:00): Hello.
Please do NOT "test" on the live OSM map. This map is used by a large number of people and other data consumers and it's inappropriate to experiment on this data.
skquinn (2021-10-04 07:06:44+00:00): Comment is wrong. Should be: Added address. Sources should include web search. Oops.
MapTheWalk (2021-10-05 14:00:39+00:00): Hi, this changeset deleted several ways and replaced them with new ones, instead of simply modifying the geometry.
As a result, the previous tags for address and building use have been lost. Kindly request that you complete the new ways with those original tags.
Momochaps123 (2021-10-04 02:31:50+00:00): Added Centro el Pinar
mueschel (2021-10-05 09:25:14+00:00): Hi,
please check these edits. All the ways have many foreign tags which don't look like they should be in OSM.
user_11418917 (2021-10-05 05:39:04+00:00): Reverted, these are not "attractions" if you want to add them put them in the right tag. for example you added "engine oil change station" what is the name of the shop?
Supaplex (2021-10-04 02:55:19+00:00): 台灣這邊有不成文規定，name欄位是輸入本地通行語言中文，然後name:zh, name:en 輸入的中文與英文
Kovoschiz (2021-10-10 10:54:23+00:00): Please don't simply replace `seamark:type=light_minor` with `man_made=lighthouse`.
Kovoschiz (2021-10-10 10:56:05+00:00): Please don't add descriptive labels. Use actual tags, if not `description:en=` and `description:zh=`.
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 15:35:12+00:00): You accidentally put `name=West 39th Street` and `oneway=yes` on a traffic light instead of the street. Please be more careful.
Frans S (2021-10-04 14:58:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
PLease be sure you map a building when you see a vague impression. Check for shadows, paths, a yard or other proof of human activity. I removed some. 

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112054428
save2desk (2021-10-16 15:33:01+00:00): Но тропа есть и активно используется.
Samokat (2021-10-18 11:03:51+00:00): Неконтролируемый участок дороги, к тому же — опасный. С таким же успехом можно с любой точки ЖД перейти.
save2desk (2021-10-18 12:13:57+00:00): Знаю о незаконности перехода в необорудованном месте, но с удалением народной тропы согласиться не могу.
Тропу вернул, но добавил тэг access=no.
Frans S (2022-01-09 09:28:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. (sorry, a bit late)
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
Even Important: Buildings should be tagged as building=yes. Nothing else. Not area=yes or building=house.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112055330
locke (2022-12-19 08:52:36+00:00): Hi,
I do think it is a good idea to have the stations on the map. But I don't think it is good to have landuse-tags an place-tags in one relation as the stations are not farmland only in most cases. So the relations are often wrong both for the borders of the stations and the landuse should not overlap other landuses previously mapped. So I think there should be a place-relation for the station only without landuse.
Best regards Stephan
❤️‍🔥 (2022-12-19 19:10:36+00:00): hey, yeah I agree landuse=meadow isn't the best tag. Nor is landuse=farmland. There was a brief discussion on the talk-nz mailing list a year ago: https://lists.osm.org/pipermail/talk-nz/2021/000309.html

If you've got ideas for how to tag them better then let's change it. Maybe `type=boundary` +  `boundary=something` ?
locke (2022-12-20 07:15:34+00:00): Hi, to be honest, I don't have a good idea right know, still thinking about it. Some sort of "boundary" seems reasonable to tag the borders of the pastoral leases, and several landuse=meadow where there is grassland but leave out areas with wood or bare rocks.
mariotomo (2021-10-04 14:06:22+00:00): but, Guido, this way the route does not go from terminal to terminal. also a mistake, and information loss.
gscholz (2021-10-04 14:24:52+00:00): Ok Mario. A route relation may be the better choice here.
Guido
mariotomo (2021-10-04 14:29:27+00:00): definitely, thank you for your patience. would you like to do that?  or shall I put it on my todo list?
gscholz (2021-10-05 04:38:10+00:00): Hi Mario,
I did not find a support in JOSM for ferry routes. So I reverted my changeset and shifted the line slightly to the west. The ferry line added by changeset 67584935 still has open ends.
Guido
mariotomo (2021-10-05 14:34:00+00:00): hola Guido, what do you think of this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112126234
mariotomo (2021-10-05 14:35:06+00:00): (knowing the local dynamics, it looks weird to me that you can go from one terminal in Almirante to two different terminals in Bocas Town).
gscholz (2021-10-08 04:18:43+00:00): Hi Mario,
looks OK for me.
Guido
maraf24 (2021-10-04 18:43:13+00:00): A dlaczego skasowałeś tag landuse=education?
NieWnen (2021-10-04 19:34:38+00:00): Pewnie z tego samego powodu jak większość, bo się nie renderuje. Jak dla mnie do cofnięcia, ale tylko samo school na education, bo już są 2 amenity na tym terenie.
maraf24 (2021-10-04 19:45:34+00:00): Może być to jeszcze sprawka edytora iD, może głupieje przy nowym tagu.
NieWnen (2021-10-04 19:59:33+00:00): Raczej nie powinien, a przynajmniej w innym obszarze, który tak oznaczyłem nie wskazuje błędów.
Faktem jest to, że jest już prawie 3.5k obiektów tak zmapowanych, więc no render tego powinien być.
Владимир К (2021-12-05 17:28:23+00:00): Добрый день!
Скажите, что означают ваши изменения здесь? Насколько я знаю, ПДД запрещает движение пешеходов по проезжей части, если рядом есть тротуар. я вижу тротуар вдоль этой дороги со спутника, значит ходить там нельзя. а вы вешаете тег foot=yes. зачем?
user_22322865 (2025-01-11 15:25:10+00:00): Why did you move Walmart?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2950818090/history/4
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-13 19:58:58+00:00): https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=112057438

looks like accidental damage
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-01-14 03:50:21+00:00): I moved it back, thanks for spotting, sorry for an accidental drag :(
Larmax (2021-10-10 11:44:10+00:00): Hei, länsituuli oli jaettu kahteen osaan, koska itäisellä puolella pyöräily on kielletty tai ainakin oli vielä muutama kuukausi sitten, kuten tässä Mapillary-kuvassa näkyy: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=60.175534766110985&lng=24.80232498583291&z=19.499332206017105&pKey=134803455428108&x=0.17486870182905792&y=0.6039939041187784&zoom=0&focus=photo
kirma (2021-10-10 16:26:43+00:00): Toivotaan ettei ole ainakaan enää, koska se olisi järjenvastaista siinä mielessä että varsinkin kadun itäpäässä on runsaasti uusia polkupyörätelineitä ja niitä myös käytetään. Itäpäästä käsin niitä ei niihin telineisiin ainakaan voisi tuoda kuin taluttamalla tai kantamalla. Ne pyörätelineet ovat vielä kaiken lisäksi kaupungin tontilla...
Larmax (2021-10-10 16:31:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112046467 Tämän mukaan ovatkin siis poistuneet.
ovruni (2021-10-04 05:46:21+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este y otros conjuntos de cambios ha agregado vías residenciales en lo que son escaleras para subir a los cerros. Estos pueden divisarse desde la imagen de Esri aclarada, que es la imagen mas clara para la ciudad de Lima.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Numbergod (2025-01-25 10:30:57+00:00): Hi Mate.  I've just noticed a heap of points with no tags that seem to be part of this changeset.  It's only 3 years old.  Any ideas?  ;-)
❤️‍🔥 (2025-01-30 12:12:02+00:00): sorry about this... the Level0 editor has a limit of 500 features per edit, so it looks like the editor lost all my changes except the first 500 nodes 🤦 I've cleaned this up now in https://osm.org/changeset/161934838
Numbergod (2025-01-30 12:17:15+00:00): All good mate.  I wasn't worried.  Just stumbled across it.  Good work sorting it out.  Night!
Monumental610 (2021-10-04 07:17:19+00:00): Metro Line 1 should be blue . Line 13 should be purple (it's still in proposed stage).
Vonter (2021-10-04 09:03:35+00:00): Hey. Thanks for the information, I have corrected it now in this changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112065989
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
vulasala (2021-10-05 06:19:20+00:00): Hi Poompak,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 254653350 and way 25465334 from service to residential, as the area is residential area.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112060681
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
wireguy (2022-03-07 19:25:49+00:00): Whitefish River First Nation relation is broken
looks like way 522715530  needs to be added
Nickel Belt relation 13096916
is also broken