piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lee Carré (2021-11-18 13:05:22+00:00): Further thoughts; part of why I tagged only Broad Street itself was because that's where the restriction signage was.

Incase it was re-opened to (general) motor_vehicle traffic, that made it easy to update, rather than having to remember to re-tag all the subsequent roads, too. If they weren't also re-tagged then that would adversely affect routing.

Changing fewer elements means less bloat in the database (since each revision is preserved), too.

In terms of routing, since it's a one-way system, then Broad Street being closed also means that the subsequent roads are inaccessible (by motor_vehicles); a cascade effect of the same restrictions without having to make them explicit on each subsequent road. Particularly since there's no signage (about these access restrictions) at those locations.
However, I suppose the counter-argument is routing for non-motor traffic (pedestrians, bicycles, etc.).

I was attempting to avoid an obvious failure-mode in future (whatever that might be, when the States decide if Broad Street remains pedestrianised or re-opens to motor traffic). If it remained closed, then re-tagging all the subsequent roads would definitely make sense. But, even the States don't know if it's (long-term) temporary or permanent(, yet).

The general policy on temporary changes (e.g. roadworks) is to be very careful about them, since some data-users don't fetch updates for a long time (months, or sometimes never).

Strictly, we should be using *:conditional tagging, with OH syntax, so that the data contains the current published end-date, which we simply keep bumping as the term of the restrictions is extended. But, from what I've read (re how to properly handle the likes of roadworks) very few data-parsers make use of those sorts of conditionals (e.g. highway:conditional). However, wouldn't hurt to add them alongside other tagging.
Lee Carré (2021-11-18 17:51:19+00:00): Here; uniform AND *accurate*/*correct*: http://www.osm.org/changeset/113954606 . This clean-up took the best part of an afternoon, instead of being able to do productive work (elsewhere).
Lee Carré (2021-11-24 18:18:44+00:00): Further evidence: a call for Broad Street to be reopened to motor traffic http://petitions.gov.je/petitions/200485
maro21 (2024-08-11 21:45:53+00:00): Krawcowa to craft=dressmaker, nie shop=tailor :)
Mordechai23 (2021-11-17 22:22:29+00:00): Jest to zmiana potencjalnie kontrowersyjna, więc bardzo proszę, jesli się z nią nie zgadzasz->skomentuj tutaj, przedyskutujemy
Yunkers (2021-11-19 20:16:37+00:00): Jedyna kontrowersja jaką tu widzę to to, że droga ma i construction=primary jak i proposed=primary. Nie wydaje mi się, żeby te dwa tagi szły w parze?
workaround (2021-11-19 17:21:45+00:00): Dann bitte ändern/entfernen
dktue (2021-11-18 15:15:11+00:00): War das abgesprochen? Zuvor gab es eine lange Diskussion, weshalb der Mittelpunkt genau dort sein sollte.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113324844
aequator (2021-11-18 18:26:24+00:00): Insofern, als wir auf dem letzten Stuttgarter Stammtisch unzufrieden darüber waren, dass die Landeshauptstadt bei Zoomstufe 6 und 7 vom Label "verdeckt" wird. Ich habe danach den Label-Node von "irgendwo" im Schönbuch genau zum Elysium geschoben. Nachdem Stuttgart aber nach 2 Wochen immer noch verdeckt wird, hab ich das Label versuchsweise um 0,1° verschoben, um zu sehen, wie der Carto CSS sich dann verhält. Uns schien es so, dass der Renderer den Schriftzug zwischen Landeshauptstadt und das Label setzt oder selber das Zentrum der Fläche errechnet. Du kannst den Node gerne zurückschieben. Magst du mir noch einen Link zu der Diskussion senden? Ich hatte nichts gefunden. 
Viele Grüße
Carsten
dcskobuffs (2021-11-19 21:34:47+00:00): Correction: Source used was Mapillary
hauke-stieler (2022-10-20 18:42:21+00:00): Hi, nur als Hinweis: Du hast hier (wahrscheinlich ausversehen) den shop-tag von der Bäckerei Eichel entfernt. Vor dem Hochladen einmal drauf achten, ob alle Änderungen gewollt sind ;)
rarad74 (2021-11-28 20:38:35+00:00): Hi. What did you do there more precisely? Because farmland multipoligon around Satu Mare begins to not be rendered. It seems you delete alot of data there.
rarad74 (2021-11-28 20:44:20+00:00): You have only 3 edits and you delete all clc data from Around Satu Mare without any explanation. Your edit was reverted.
5m4u9 (2021-11-18 00:09:53+00:00): Hi, in Bolivia ESRI, Mapbox, MAXAR imagery have offset. Please use Bing imagery
Mapistopheles (2021-11-18 15:24:09+00:00): Thank you for this feedback. Are you able to provide me with a resource to confirm which imageries are the most accurate in Bolivia?
5m4u9 (2021-11-18 21:48:20+00:00): I use gps traces captured by friends and myself to compare what imagery is more accure, Bing have correction in slopes, gorges and valleys; for east region of Bolivia (pando, beni, santa cruz) we use ESRI imagery because in this regions are more flat; for western region of bolivia Bing is more accure. In La Paz/El Alto we have orthophotos uploaded to https://openaerialmap.org/
Mapistopheles (2021-11-18 22:41:30+00:00): Thank you for providing this information and link. I really appreciate it and appreciate your feedback.
5m4u9 (2021-11-18 00:11:27+00:00): 113919677
Mapistopheles (2021-11-18 15:25:01+00:00): Thank you for this feedback. Are you able to provide me with a resource to confirm which imageries are the most accurate in Bolivia?
wireguy (2021-11-18 02:20:59+00:00): Hi Dom, welcome to OSM!   Good job adding houses to the map.   If you press 'Q' key when the building is selected, it will square the corners on the building and make them look nicer.   Keep mapping!
marczoutendijk (2021-11-22 11:01:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114093015 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of streetname vandalism
marczoutendijk (2021-11-22 11:01:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114093015 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of streetname vandalism
archpdx (2021-11-20 21:24:54+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for updating this new development - I added all the roads Mission Village a couple months ago. There are a few things in this changeset I noticed that could use some fixing:
1. Road names shouldn't be abbreviated (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviation). For example, 'Valencia Blvrd' should be 'Valencia Boulevard'
2. It looks like you added fords for when Valencia Blvd crosses an intermittent stream - these could be removed

If you need any further help or have any questions feel free to respond to my comment.

Thanks,
archpdx
sparrowman980 (2021-12-04 23:53:27+00:00): Thanks, archpdx. I will do as you have suggested.
marczoutendijk (2021-11-22 11:01:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114093015 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of streetname vandalism
JesseFTW (2021-11-19 12:56:56+00:00): Looks like you deleted part of the coastline by mistake in this changeset? Please fix that -- you can use the reverter UI http://revert.osmz.ru to undo the whole changeset, then put back the parts that were correct.
HMWamboldt (2021-11-20 08:55:18+00:00): Hi JesseFTW!

Thank you for the heads up. I found and fixed a bay relation where I accidentally deleted(?) a member. Also I had a self-intersection of a beach that touched a coastline. I couldn't find any problems with any coastline segments tho'. Hopefully those fixes solved the problem. OSM Inspector didn't show anything else. I'll check it after the next run. I'm loath to revert the entire changeset since I continued making additional changes in the same area that probably have geographic overlap, and reverts run the risk of turning a small fix into a big job. Also there are other people mapping in the province and we all make changes all over the province without coordination, so overlaps are common.

I practice egoless mapping. If you find I've made an error, please feel free to just fix it. I try especially hard not to break the coastline. I know that can be a serious blocker.

Thanks again for the heads up. If It still isn't fixed, could you let me know how to find the problem? I use Osmose and OSM Inspector, but I don't (currently) run any local verification tools.

Best Rgds,
-H-
JesseFTW (2021-11-20 19:35:44+00:00): Thanks, sorry I didn't include the relation in the comment ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13341310 ) -- it looks like it's fixed now! I would have fixed it myself, but I wasn't sure where the proper segment should be located, so I thought I'd ask you instead. Appreciate all your work!
marczoutendijk (2021-11-22 11:01:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114093015 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of streetname vandalism
marczoutendijk (2021-11-22 11:01:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114093015 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of streetname vandalism
Frans S (2021-12-13 11:02:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113922674
Vasak87 (2021-11-18 06:27:37+00:00): Это неправильное название деревни,деревня называется Шош Շոշ,а не шушакенд
syntex (2025-07-27 12:03:07+00:00): ok
gscholz (2021-12-24 06:43:01+00:00): Hi FS Patagonia,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Amaya":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-67.83794&lat=-38.98456&zoom=16&opacity=0.57

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113923399

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
FS Patagonia (2021-12-24 16:44:37+00:00): Relaciones Reparadas. Saludos!
marczoutendijk (2021-11-22 11:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114093015 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of streetname vandalism
marczoutendijk (2021-11-22 11:01:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114093015 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of streetname vandalism
marczoutendijk (2021-11-22 11:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114093015 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of streetname vandalism
marczoutendijk (2021-11-22 11:01:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114093015 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of streetname vandalism
Frans S (2021-12-13 11:01:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113924599
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
ADentNZ (2021-11-18 04:32:02+00:00): https://www.hamilton.govt.nz/our-services/transport/bike-hamilton/Documents/Bike%20Hamilton%20Map%20Z%20Card%20-%20Maps%20-%20WEB.pdf
ADentNZ (2021-11-18 04:31:49+00:00): https://www.hamilton.govt.nz/our-services/transport/bike-hamilton/Documents/Bike%20Hamilton%20Map%20Z%20Card%20-%20Maps%20-%20WEB.pdf
ADentNZ (2021-11-18 04:31:28+00:00): https://www.hamilton.govt.nz/our-services/transport/bike-hamilton/Documents/Bike%20Hamilton%20Map%20Z%20Card%20-%20Maps%20-%20WEB.pdf
ivanbranco (2021-11-19 15:43:37+00:00): This looks like an import, you used a lot of new tags, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9262565927

Can you fix it?
mueschel (2021-11-21 17:34:23+00:00): I reverted this changeset for now - feel free to add these objects with proper tagging.
Warin61 (2022-10-11 06:26:24+00:00): Hi

Building levels should be integer numbers not 'elevator'. There are at least 20 of these, I've only looked along the Richmond line .. I expect more of them with a complete search. ... I'll simply delete the lot?
kawino85 (2021-11-20 17:34:34+00:00): This is simply wrong: The actual dump landuse https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295785262 is already tagged as landfill.
Da_Capo (2021-11-22 10:21:31+00:00): Hi kawino85

Thanks for reaching out. I have restored the original data.
kawino85 (2021-11-22 13:38:28+00:00): Thank you very much!
Steven Vance (2021-11-18 05:59:01+00:00): I also added a bike shop.
pilotroads (2021-11-18 06:22:58+00:00): 1 stream to Skjærungåe river
kawino85 (2021-11-18 18:24:59+00:00): Why have you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13436465/history ? It was a valid relation.
ottwiz (2021-11-19 05:42:26+00:00): Because I merged the members to the US 35 (WV) relation, I hope it's not a problem, because that's how the current route of US 35 goes. (And i didn't understand why to have a separate relation just for the newly opened highway part) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1593688

If you wish to revert this, then alright but still it won't make any sense to have a relation without a name and ref tags.
ottwiz (2021-11-19 06:11:47+00:00): upd: I see that you are a new mapper. I'm actually an experienced mapper and know how to deal with relations, I usually show my work to the American people especially to those who live around that area or nearby state, and didn't get a question on this.

It's an unwritten rule, but try to avoid duplicates of relations which follow the same route. (because it's just an unnecessary data package for the server)
in the case of super relation it may make sense to have a relation divided into parts, but this is not a super relation. (other experienced mappers, please correct me, if i'm wrong)
Mannivu (2021-11-18 12:45:28+00:00): Perfetto! Grazie!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113930520
literan (2021-11-18 20:47:38+00:00): там не продаются телефоны? во всех мегафонах, что я видел, продавались. Обычно ставят оба тега.
theirix (2021-11-19 06:14:39+00:00): ага, поставил оба тэга. на вики не предлагалась такая типовая комбинация главных тэгов. Вообще насколько лучше использовать shop=telecommunication вместо office=telecommunication и shop=mobile_phone? Он на порядок реже, но лучше отражает суть.
literan (2021-11-19 12:39:16+00:00): в вики он не документирован, так что лучше его не использовать. Наверняка и не рендерится ничем (может, чтото старое забытое)
ivanbranco (2021-11-27 12:32:18+00:00): If it's collapsed and the old tags are not relevant anymore I would just delete them instead of using a ruins:* prefix, what do you think about it?
Serzhanya (2022-02-20 13:56:14+00:00): I agree with you.
rainerU (2021-11-22 17:01:16+00:00): Hallo Tanja,
du hast die Adresse Ulmer Straße 32 in Roth 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9261693022 in die Pfaffenhofener Straße verschoben. Das ist wahrscheinlich nicht korrekt. Kannst du das bitte überprüfen und ggf. korrigieren. Danke.
Rainer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113931438
AndersAndersson (2021-11-18 14:15:00+00:00): Det var en punkt från min GPS där hastigheten växlade mellan 50 och 30 km/h. Jag hade glömt att radera name.
eggie (2021-11-18 08:50:26+00:00): Dag Bart...  Kennelijk kun je hier als voetganger gewoon passeren.
Nu routeert het ook niet meer voor fietsers. Kunnen die ook niet passeren via de berm.
Een klein stukje highway=path om het hek heen?

Of bicycle=yes op het hek??
MVG
eggie
JLZIMMERMANN (2021-11-23 09:37:58+00:00): Bonjour Joseph,
La gare est en travaux et le bâti est à ce jour de plus petite taille.
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:49:11+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:49:03+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
Erick tamba (2021-11-20 07:48:55+00:00): Added building using bing imagery
meinmap (2021-11-18 11:04:07+00:00): Ciao, mi sa che hai erroneaemente eliminato il tag building=yes
Andrea Del Sarto (2021-11-18 12:28:30+00:00): Ciao, hai ragione ho sistemato
grazie
meinmap (2021-11-18 12:38:07+00:00): Ok ;)
Buona continuazione
Dimacn (2021-11-18 16:42:40+00:00): По какой причине было удалено название улицы? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349146347/history Вандализм - это нехорошо.  Пожалуйста будьте внимательнее и верните название улицы.
NetWormKido (2021-11-19 02:29:56+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо что заметили это. Конечно это не вандализм (намеренная порча данных), а случайность. Скорее всего, когда исправлял маршрут вместе с названием маршрута случайно удалил и название улиц. Что же и такое случается, буду внимательнее, спасибо за бдительность. Вернул названия улиц.
AndersAndersson (2021-11-18 14:01:34+00:00): Du kan ta fixme igen. Den är mappad precis som den ser ut i verkligheten. Tidigare fortsatte den fram till Polhemshjulet för att leverera vatten, men nu går den bara en bit.
SekeRob (2021-11-18 08:24:52+00:00): 28 issues resolved in 1 small edit... pretty good. :O)

Goodos on great detailed mapping of this village.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
AndersAndersson (2021-11-18 13:45:29+00:00): Du går fram som en ångvält.
Den exakta adressen finns inte. Men utifrån den gick det att se att bruksleden.se är hemsidan och att etappen fått en ny URL. Lägg in den.
https://www.bruksleden.se/vandra/lillsjon-trabacken-bruksleden-etapp-26/
AndersAndersson (2021-11-18 13:42:59+00:00): Har du varit på platsen? Endurospåret går inte ut mitt i kurvan på bilvägen. Det kan visserligen ha ändrats sen jag var där sist, men det känns inte troligt.

En automatisk varning är en uppmaning att undersöka, inte att åtgärda för att släcka varningen.
eggie (2021-11-18 08:53:32+00:00): Dag Bart.. De combinatie access=destination (algemeen voor iedereen) en motor_vehicle=destination klopt niet.
Wanneer er een uitzondering is voor hulpdiensten zul je specifiek  emergency=yes moeten taggen.
Wel bord staat vooraan de weg?
Geldt access=destination voor iedereen? 

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
Bart van Veldhuisen VGGM Brandweer Amsterdam (2021-11-18 08:59:34+00:00): hier moet dn emergy yes op komen, dit geldt voor het gehele stuk van Quadenoord/bosbeekweg naar de A 12 toe, er ontbreekt hier een stuk weg waardoor het in de navigatie niet meegenomen wordt kun jij dit maken?
eggie (2021-11-18 08:59:51+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan om de juiste access- tagging te vinden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring
In dit geval dus
motor_vehicle=destination (vanwege het onderbord) & moped=yes & mofa=yes & traffic_sign=NL:C12

en access=destination verwijderen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-18 09:01:03+00:00): Bart.. Zal even kijken of ik er uit kom...
Bart van Veldhuisen VGGM Brandweer Amsterdam (2021-11-18 09:03:26+00:00): WIl ji dit doen? top dank je
eggie (2021-11-18 09:48:49+00:00): Het ontbrekende stukje bij Quadenoord 5 is getagd als fietspad door PeeWee. Je zou het hem even kunnen vragen hoe het zit. 
Er is hier kennelijk geen parallelfietspad. 
Het routeert gewoon voor motorvoertuigen, maar ik heb emergency = yes toegevoegd.
Alle ten noorden waar het Bosbeekweg gaat heten heeft geen access=destinationtags dus zou gewoon moeten routeren voor de hulodiensten. emergency=yes is dan niet nodig. 

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-18 09:53:38+00:00): Bart.. Ik heb PeeWee even gevraagd te kijken. 
gr eggie
PeeWee32 (2021-11-18 10:59:53+00:00): Ik heb daar we gefiets maar ben er niet echt bekend. Er is daar niet een stuk track verwijderd onlangs want op een oude OFM zie ik ook alleen het fietspad. Ook BGT lijkt te bevestigen dat er daar alleen een fietspad is en geen naastgelegen track. Dit itt tot net voor en net na dat stuk. Groet Peter
eggie (2021-11-18 11:15:11+00:00): Oke.. dan laat ik het zo. Het zal overigens wel voor de hulpdiensten routeren.
Gr eggie
PeeWee32 (2021-11-18 14:28:16+00:00): Ja.. ik had het fietspad op 3,5 meter breed ingeschat dus daar moet over te routeren zijn ;) 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434826334
Bart van Veldhuisen VGGM Brandweer Amsterdam (2021-11-18 15:01:15+00:00): Is het nu in de kaart mogelijk het hele zandpad te gebruiken, dit is voor ons een belangrijke route naar het spoor toe?
eggie (2021-11-18 15:07:39+00:00): Op de wegdelen waar motor_vehicle=destination staat vind je ook de tag emergency=yes
Het zou dus moeten werken.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-18 15:09:39+00:00): Er van uitgaande dat jullie routingapp emergency=yes ondersteunt...
Bart van Veldhuisen VGGM Brandweer Amsterdam (2021-11-18 15:12:33+00:00): Ja Eggie dat klopt, als dit er staat zouden we er langs moeten  navigeren. We gaan de OSM nu gebruiken voor de regionale brandweer en zijn dus druk bezig om alles goed te krijgen, is wel veel werk nog. Maar bedankt!!
eggie (2021-11-18 15:18:52+00:00): Laat maar weten als je hulp nodig hebt.. op het osm forum loopt ook een draadje over mappen door VR teams..
eggie (2021-11-18 15:21:35+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66876&p=7
Bart van Veldhuisen VGGM Brandweer Amsterdam (2021-11-18 15:22:03+00:00): we kunnen zeker nog wel hulp gebruiken. Is het mogelijk om het hier eens samen over te hebben?
eggie (2021-11-18 15:29:07+00:00): Bart.. Je kunt dan het beste contact opnemen met Commodoortje. Hij begeleidt ook mappers van de VRT en VRIJ.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Commodoortje

Ook zijn er 'zoom' bijeenkomsten waar de VR ook in participeerde.
Daar ben je ook welkom.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71852

Je hoeft je speciaal niet aan te melden.
eggie (2021-11-18 15:35:36+00:00): 'k Heb het even doorgespeeld naar Commodoortje.
Bart van Veldhuisen VGGM Brandweer Amsterdam (2021-11-18 15:37:44+00:00): Top dank je wel!!
Commodoortje (2021-11-19 06:49:00+00:00): Bart, ik ga contact met je opnemen.
Is Gelderland-Midden jouw VR?