piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2020-04-01 17:15:59+00:00): Ano, napr. na D1 name nie je, takze ak je mozne nepridavajte to. name=PR1BINA samozrejme pridat mozete, na useku kde to patri. Ja by som vsade na motorway i motorway_link pridal oneway=yes alebo no, nech je to explicitne. Modranka vyzera skoro OK, srafovany trojuholnik uz mozeme povazovat za rozdelenie ciest, ale ked jen obycajna ciara medzi jazdnymi pruhmi tak to este nie (niektore vozidla ju smu prejst, takze by cesta este nemala byt delena na 2 ways). Vcera som skusil vzorovo spravit krizovatku na D2 Lozorno, tam som dal aj znacku 'change' na useky kde uz sa oficialne nesmie zmenit pruh doprava, ale fyzicky cesta este nie je oddelena. Skuste pozriet.
Ja to tiez este prejdem, po vcerajsich zmenahc na R1 Vam par usekov trunk zostalo tak to vycistim. Dakujem
aceman444 (2020-04-01 17:17:34+00:00): Ano andi dal na R7 D4 name namiesto ref, co ste opravili (pridali ref), tak name bolo treba odobrat. Tam som to uz urobil.
mapko (2020-04-01 18:42:31+00:00): ČIže motorway_link oneway=no je pripustna kombinacia?
V Modranke som upravil junctions od D1.
Dakujem za ukazku.
Niekde mi trunk usiel? Vcera som sa dostal od TT po L.Viesku a dnes som presiel na Pribinu do BB. Od Viesky po BB je co robit.
ANDimu som veril... Vsimol som si, ze si odobral tam nespravne uvedene name.
aceman444 (2020-04-01 19:09:11+00:00): Ano motorway_link oneway=no moze byt, ked je niekde obojsmerna. Len motorway vraj implikuje oneway=yes, ale radsej to davame natvrdo, lebo nie vsetky aplikacie tento "default" maju.
Ano upratal som napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82939081
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82939065
mapko (2020-04-01 19:34:08+00:00): Dakujem, som mudrejsi.
Super, len jedno som prehliadol.
Ano, pri Novej Bani som to preto nemenil nech nesposobim problem, nez sa poradim.
mike140 (2020-09-25 09:17:43+00:00): "Подъезд" - это что название дома?
oba510 (2020-04-14 04:35:14+00:00): Hey, this is not correct - the street was reconfigured a few months ago.
lrw2 (2020-04-14 20:37:10+00:00): Hello oba510, 
Thanks for letting us know that there have been recent changes in this area. We apologize for making this change without first checking on city resources. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused.
Thank you,
Lisa
Carto'Cité (2020-04-13 19:39:24+00:00): Salut Philippe,
C'est encore Charles (avec le bon compte cette fois). J'ai vu que tu avais ajouté le sens unique sur cette piste merci (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393459420). J'ai regardé les photos qui datent de mai 2019 et j'ai vu qu'au niveau du carefour, il n'y a pas de piste et que les cycliste sont à nouveau avec sur la chaussée. J'ai aussi vu qu'il manquait des bandes cyclables. Je vais corriger tout ça ; n'hésite pas à me faire tes remarques au besoin.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Philippe9517 (2020-04-14 22:45:10+00:00): Ok, très bien.
J'ai modifié le tracé de la piste cyclable O->E au niveau de l'intersection bd de la résistance/Allée Ferdinand Lèger.
Il y a une discontinuité de la piste cyclable a cet endroit.
Philippe
Carto'Cité (2020-04-15 08:24:54+00:00): Excuse moi, la portion de piste dont je parlais est supprimée et c'est cette portion que j'aurais du pointer : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/791527318
Les modification au niveau de l'intersection bd de la résistance/Allée Ferdinand Lèger sont bonnes merci :)
Charles de Carto’Cité
Greg_Rose (2020-04-28 00:29:01+00:00): Hi there - Please explain what is meant by "needs station verification" for the Empire Builder route (relation 10946021). Is there a question of accuracy here, or is there something else at play?
clay_c (2020-04-28 02:31:39+00:00): Not really sure. It was there before I edited it and I didn't want to remove it as I split the route into its constituent parts. All the stations are mapped in detail now, so it can probably be removed.
jtracey (2020-04-01 03:18:58+00:00): please don't add duplicate nodes for elements already tagged as ways (e.g., if a building has an address, you do not also need an address node)
ralley (2020-04-01 04:45:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit - just a couple of things: a driveway should be tagged highway=service and service=driveway and please don't put descriptions like "driveway" in the name field, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only  I've cleaned this up.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82893994
user_5359 (2020-04-01 04:15:30+00:00): Hello! Please notice: the keyword is written area not aera.
village (2020-05-02 23:25:21+00:00): Hut ab vor der Fleißarbeit! (du hast ausdrücklich um Review gebeten)

osmcha fallen nur 2 Kleinigkeiten als "flagged features" auf:
https://osm.org/node3476353897 steht ohne Eigenschaften da. Ist da nun ein Tor oder nicht vor dem Kirchof?
Das andere "flagged feature" verstehe ich auch nicht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82894128
kucai (2020-04-01 14:24:59+00:00): Locals usually use unclassified in industrial areas while reserving service roads for inside of a company's compound. If it can have a street name, it is almost usually not a service road (in most cases btw, exceptions exist).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82894238
TheTylerS (2020-04-02 17:15:23+00:00): Thank you for the feedback, sounds good. I’ve changed the roads from service to unclassified as per your recommendations.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82894238
mavl (2020-04-01 04:04:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.  
Пожалуйста, имейте в виду, что OpenStreetMap - это карта реальных объектов, которой пользуются многие люди, а не место для шуток.
DP24PH (2020-04-15 07:18:05+00:00): This East-West Road needs further verification after the Enhanced Community Quarantine.
mavl (2020-04-01 04:04:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отмены.  
Пожалуйста, имейте в виду, что OpenStreetMap - это карта реальных объектов, которой пользуются многие люди, а не место для шуток.
user_5359 (2020-04-01 04:43:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
user_5359 (2020-04-01 04:42:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Glassman (2020-04-01 17:35:33+00:00): You do know that this golf course is closed and will not re-open. 

Also - please don't delete features and then redraw them. Doing so loses all history of the objects.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82897728
Geofreund1 (2020-07-10 16:59:16+00:00): Hallo j1scad,
die neue Anbindung der A24 an die B167, die du da eingetragen hast, funktioniert so wohl nicht. Bitte schau dir die Einbahnstraßen noch einmal an.
Danke
Gruß
Geofreund1
wermak (2020-07-18 13:52:52+00:00): Ich kann keinen Fehler erkennen, Routing funktioniert auch. Was funktioniert denn nicht?

Schöne Grüße
Geofreund1 (2020-07-18 20:23:52+00:00): Das letzte Stück des motorway_link in Nord-Süd Richtung wird bei mir in JOSM als Straße mit oneway Kennzeichnung dargestellt. Darauf bin ich leider hereingefallen.
Also kein Fehler von j1scad, sondern eine Unzulänglichkeit von JOSM.
Geofreund1 (2020-07-23 07:25:48+00:00): JOSM scheint einen motorway_link by default mit Richtungspfeilen entsprechend der OSM Wegerichtung darzustellen, auch ohne dass oneway=yes eingetragen ist. Ich habe daher auf dem von Norden kommenden gemeinsamen Ast des motorway_link explizit oneway=no eingetragen (wie es schon auf der gegenüberliegenden Auffahrt der Fall war).
Taká (2021-09-09 12:46:41+00:00): a
siwilde (2020-04-01 07:39:06+00:00): Hi Bara Nabulsi - I have been looking at another mappers work and noticed had classified some minor roads as "Primary" - I'm not sure they are correct - if you are mapping for the Tanzania Development Trust, Crowd 2Map project please come join us on Slack I think we have some document that may help you - thanks
Angelo Giuseppe (2021-08-14 09:41:35+00:00): Ciao mcheck, ho visto che hai inserito un marciapiede "678908602,v2" non rispetta la realtà, e soprattutto hai rotto una relazione, puoi revertare e riportare la situazione com'era prima?
Angelo Giuseppe (2021-10-16 07:19:37+00:00): Visto che hai risposto immediatamente procedo io a sistemare la cosa, comunque cerca di non rompere più il lavoro altrui.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-10-17 15:48:56+00:00): Ciao Angelo, l'utente mcheck non ti può rispondere perché è bloccato dal DWG: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5273 Ciao, Andrea
user_5359 (2020-04-01 17:56:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Russ McD (2020-05-21 19:41:09+00:00): Oum, I'm a little confused as to why in your "changing road shape" edit, you have turned about 20km of Hwy 304 into a road with the access=private tag ?  Its just the North-South carriageway.
Naturally using routing in this area gives some very strange results.
Im assuming it was a careless mistake, and I have removed the offending tag today, but you may like to review any other edits where you have changed things and might have made the same mistake. 
The sections of the 304 either side, do not carry the access=private tag ... just the new bits you played with.  If it was not an error, please explain the rationale behind it.
Rgds, Russ
mavl (2020-04-01 15:28:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил со здания тег здания. Я взял на себя смелость отменить это изменения, как это похоже на случайную ошибку.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327082354/history
Vinber (2020-04-04 05:34:37+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Kovoschiz (2020-04-01 08:39:25+00:00): Is the name decided yet?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82904751
Kovoschiz (2020-04-01 08:41:33+00:00): Oh ok
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82904751
Mond00 (2020-04-06 12:42:49+00:00): An welchen Wochentagen gelten die Öffnungszeiten?
fehcxe (2020-04-06 14:43:41+00:00): Die ausgehängten Zeitpläne sind sieben Tage in der Woche für die Dauer der Eindämmung. Außerhalb der Eindämmung sind die Stunden von 6:00 bis 20:00 Uhr.
MapAnalyser465 (2020-04-02 23:35:03+00:00): Hi Warin61,

I would like to follow up on your recent changeset to St Peters, NSW and in particular some inaccurate and unverifiable edits saved. 

I understand that LPI NSW satellite imagery is the most commonly used imagery in the region, but as I used Ersi Satellite Imagery in changeset 82847724, it currently displays the most recent and up to date imagery of the infrastructure in the area, including the alignment of the roadways.

Could you let me know what satellite imagery you are basing your edits on (I assume it is LPI NSW) and if we can make a consensus on the status of St Peters Interchange and its nearby links please?

Please avoid any further edits in the St Peters area until we can discuss these changes further.

Regards,

MapAnalyser465
aharvey (2020-04-03 00:16:21+00:00): Also the Maxar Premium/Standard imagery appear to have the newly constructed roads like the ESRI Satellite. The Maxar Bushfire imagery has them partly constructed, so agree there is enough here to map out the bridges in construction.
Warin61 (2020-04-03 03:26:43+00:00): I try to put the sources in the changeset notes.
For this changeset;

OSM - for the past sate before the reverted changeset. And also the state after that changeset. 

LPI Base Map for the admin boundaries - I think in this or the next changeset I tried to removed them from the roads - so changing the roads in the future would destroy the Admin Boundaries .. at least  in this area where lots of changes are taking place. Also for the road name correction .. more of this in a later changeset of mine. 

Maxar - I think you'll find this is slightly more upto date than Ersi? 

-------------------
My only reason for the edit was the broken Administration Boundaries. Other than that - very good work in a difficult area at the moment. I think I got a little of what you were doing back to about where it was. Note the change to Campbell Road - correction to Campbell Street on the eastern side. 
I won't be back unless the Admin Boundaries are a problem... presently mapping in the center west of the state. 

Good Luck.
Warin61 (2020-04-03 03:31:20+00:00): Errg... corrections

LPI Base Map for the admin boundaries......
 so changing the roads in the future would NOT destroy the Admin Boundaries 

Maxar - imagery for road locations. 
Please compare Maxar to Ersi and see what you think ... chose what suits you... certainly more upto date than LPI Imagery.
Tijgerd (2020-04-01 07:46:13+00:00): Heey klimpetje,

Weet je zeker dat de Putherweg in 2 wegen opsplitst die weer beide "Putherweg" heten?

Ik wist dit niet zeker..
klimpetje (2020-04-01 08:31:41+00:00): Nee zeker ben ik niet (vind het ook een beetje vreemd) , maar ik vind alleen maar deze variaties elders op het internet. Toch eens de gemeente benaderen hierover? Of kadaster?
klimpetje (2020-04-01 08:49:26+00:00): Ok zie op Google maps streetview, dat de straatnamen van die straten op stenen aan de weg liggen. Eekerweg kon ik verifiëren. De anderen zal ik deze week nog eens bekijken bij het hardlopen. Waarschijnlijk (deels) vanmiddag nog
klimpetje (2020-04-01 08:53:09+00:00): edit: Op streetview heb ik 1 naam kunnen verifiëren. De linker tak van de putherweg is stokselweg. Nu moet ik alleen de aftakking in het midden van de stokselweg nog een keer gaan bekijken
klimpetje (2020-04-01 08:57:33+00:00): edit: ik heb het bedrijf op de hoek van de keldenaar gebeld. De zijstraat heet toch echt putherweg, en de eerste weg linksaf is de stokselweg. Nu is alleen de vraag welke naam de weg heeft die verderop dan naar rechts gaat, richting sittarderweg
Tijgerd (2020-04-01 08:58:39+00:00): ik ga er NU eens heen lopen ;)
Tijgerd (2020-04-01 09:07:00+00:00): Er ligt toch echt een steen op die weg waar op staat "Putherweg" dus dan zal het dat wel zijn!
Blijft vreemd, een weg die splitst maar toch de zelfde naam behoud..
klimpetje (2020-04-01 12:38:33+00:00): Lol, cool dat je gechecked hebt. Ik ren vanavond op de windraak en zal ook aan de bovenkant van de putherweg op de sittarderweg eens kijken of er een steen met naam staat/ligt
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-06-24 04:33:04+00:00): Hi Tineretului, 
I saw you add an embankment tag to an unclassified road that crosses to this waterbody https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253441853#map=15/-12.2178/-48.5162. Do you think the west unclassified road can be tagged with embankment to ?? thanks mate
Tineretului (2021-06-24 23:19:00+00:00): Hi Akrimullah IRM-ED. Yes. That is an identical feature to the one I mapped here. I will make that update now. Best!
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-06-25 00:41:01+00:00): Great.. thank you very much mate...
pitscheplatsch (2020-04-01 16:16:58+00:00): A node in the middle of nowhere?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7353546755
AlaskaDave (2020-08-06 21:42:08+00:00): I mentioned this before but you haven't corrected your errors in either Wat Pak Mueang or nearby Wat Sri Moonrueang. The objects inside the walls that you tagged as buildings are actually better tagged as man_made=tower with tower:type=stupa.

Even if you disagree with that, these structures do not have floors or levels like multistory buildings but even if they did, your use of the layer tag to describe them is wrong. The levels in a building are LEVELS not LAYERS. That said, those stupas do not have either levels or layers; they are merely large concrete towers. Please read the Wiki to understand the difference between these two concepts.

Please reply to this comment to inform me if you are going to make the changes yourself or have me do it.

Thank you,
Dave
user_10215874 (2020-08-07 05:41:51+00:00): Thanks
AlaskaDave (2020-08-07 06:15:47+00:00): So, will you make the edits? Did you understand the difference between levels and layers?
user_10215874 (2020-08-07 15:48:15+00:00): yes
karson_ (2021-03-08 15:08:41+00:00): You mapped, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/786459222, jumping over a curb, going through hedges, and across a pedestrian area.
utkap (2021-03-09 08:27:17+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my edits. It is an honest mistake from my end, I have made the changes in this changeset #100690363.
I will be extra cautious going forward, Happy to learn from you!
 
Regards,
utkap
RicoElectrico (2020-04-01 10:27:23+00:00): Cześć, tu już był oznaczony jeden Kaufland. Dodano go w połowie grudnia 2019. Skasowałem więc ten dodany przez Ciebie. Być może masz nieaktualne mapy, ściągnij najnowsze.
canfe (2021-04-17 16:56:34+00:00): node 7353668198
davvero è un ford?
Jrachi (2021-04-17 17:12:17+00:00): Nel changeset coi sono 20 ford aggiunti/modificati.
Credo siano tutti ford o assimilabili.
C'è n'è uno solo in particolare che ti preoccupa?
canfe (2021-04-18 07:06:11+00:00): Sì solo quello perché è su di una strada asfaltata.
RicoElectrico (2020-04-01 10:30:08+00:00): Cześć, tak samo jak z Kauflandem - proszę, zaktualizuj mapy przed edytowaniem, bo tu już był zaznaczony Action. Dzięki!
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-01 18:28:43+00:00): hey, come fa il numero a essere cosi tanto lungo?
	+39 328 93333985

volevi scrivere 
	+39 328 933 3985
?

perchè spezzato rimane:

	+39 328 933 33985
ed un numero normale è:
+39 323 4567890

fammi sapere
mircozorzo (2025-11-02 08:00:25+00:00): Ciao, grazie della segnalazione, nel frattempo sembra che il numero sia cambiato: +39349 531 6992. Aggiorno.

Buon mapping, Mirco
dx125 (2020-04-02 06:59:11+00:00): danke für Dein Aufräumen.
Da bist du mir zuvor gekommen.
Der User ist sehr fleißig, bekommt es bei seinen Potlatch Edits aber nicht mit, wenn er gerade wieder mal was zerschossen hat
mueschel (2020-04-02 09:39:04+00:00): Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of keys.
E.g. it's not 
amnety=Hospital

but

amenity = hospital

And: Please take the time to write a proper changeset comment to let others know what you did.
Vinber (2020-04-04 07:57:34+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-04-04 07:58:33+00:00): Le nom que vous avez mis c'est super, mais vous n'avez pas mis les attributs permettant de comprendre ce que c'est ?
Qu'est ce donc que le City break Miradour ?
Miradour (2020-04-04 08:00:35+00:00): Location de meublé
Vinber (2020-04-04 08:12:06+00:00): c'est une agence immobilière c'est cela ?
Vinber (2020-04-04 08:12:32+00:00): et est-ce que cela occupe tout le bâtiment et les éventuels étages ?
Miradour (2020-04-05 08:21:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Nous sommes en rénovation actuellement mais à terme nous serons une maison d'hôtes. Et cela occupe tout le bâtiment.
user_136804 (2020-04-25 18:43:47+00:00): These service roads don't exist anymore.  The imagery in which they appear is old, from back when this area was a car dealership.  The whole lot's been cleared and is being turned into a grocery store.
leelamrs (2020-04-27 09:45:04+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the mistake. I Will ensure not to repeat the error again.Looking forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
leelamrs.
PT-53 (2020-04-02 07:38:43+00:00): Hallo minkus,
sollte die Zufahrt zu einem Parktplatz nicht mind.mit Service klassifiziert werden?
Fragende Grüße
minkus (2020-04-02 09:16:27+00:00): Hallo PT-53!
Die Frage ist natürlich berechtigt. Dieser Parkplatz ist offiziell keiner (es steht dort kein Parkplatzschild), bei Hochwasser wird die Schranke zugemacht. Seit Jahren wird er aber als Parkplatz benutzt. Daher habe ich mich gefragt, ob ich ihn überhaupt einzeichnen darf. Jetzt ist das ein bisschen halbherzig, das gebe ich zu.
Grüße, Martin
minkus (2020-04-02 09:42:30+00:00): Ich habe noch das Tag informal=yes hinzugefügt. Das wird z.B. hier vorgeschlagen (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60349), finde ich ziemlich passend.
Grüße, Martin
PT-53 (2020-04-02 10:01:29+00:00): Hallo Martin,
ich finde immer noch, daß die Zufahrt zum Parkplatz Service sein sollte.
Grüße
minkus (2020-04-02 12:22:51+00:00): Mir ist das eigentlich zu "offiziell", andererseits weiß ich aber auch nicht, ob es da ein Richtig oder Falsch gibt. Ich habe den Weg zum Parkplatz jetzt jedenfalls als Service-Weg getaggt.
Grüße, Martin
user_5359 (2020-04-01 17:53:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
pitscheplatsch (2020-04-02 14:02:26+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82915445
mueschel (2020-04-02 09:43:13+00:00): Hi,
could you check some of the keys you added here?

addr:city:cyr-uz
name:cyr-uz
This should be ...:uz-cyr

addr:distric:ru  -> addr:district:ru



addr:city:ru=-
I saw this tag - I guess '-' is not the actual name of the city.

geo=41.355645, 60.812843
Please don't add the coordinates to the tags


mfo=00816
This is not yet used anywhere. What does it mean?
Marych_ (2020-04-03 06:51:15+00:00): Hi, thank you for comments
cyr-uz - > uz-cyr  my mistake, will fix.
geo - OK, it s not necessary
mfo - this is a local unique bank number (like swift number); we need for validator to check all branches on the map or not

Tags with no values (like "-") should be deleted.
Marych_ (2020-04-03 06:53:30+00:00): addr:distric:ru -> addr:district:ru 
yes this is mistake
pitscheplatsch (2020-04-02 14:02:17+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82915193
WoodWoseWulf (2020-04-01 20:02:53+00:00): Hi solomonik,

Welcome to OSM!

This seems like a really strange place for a park to be. Are you sure that's the right tag for this location?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
RicoElectrico (2020-04-01 11:03:10+00:00): Cześć, dziękuję za poprawę kształtu zbiorników. Widzę, że tu jest jeszcze trochę roboty. Ścieżki wyglądają na nieaktualne, patrząc na zdjęcia lotnicze Geoportalu. Teraz przecinają te stawy. Zajmiesz się tym? Jeśli będziesz potrzebować pomocy, napisz :)
PanWanek (2020-04-01 11:13:18+00:00): Hej, właśnie je uporządkowałem :)
RicoElectrico (2020-04-01 11:38:30+00:00): Dziękuję, wygląda teraz okej. Czy ten teren to nie jest bardziej park, niż las, jak jest teraz oznaczone?
PanWanek (2020-04-01 11:55:45+00:00): Zdecydowanie bardziej park