piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-25 14:21:10+00:00): nur zur Info, guck mal in die Historie #4: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316570853/history
Wenn du sicher nichts (absichtlich und bewusst) etwas abgeändert hast, hoffe ich mal nicht, dass es sich hier um ein (neues) iD Problem handelt ;-)
Galbinus (2017-09-26 05:05:52+00:00): Dann muss ich wohl diese Änderung aus Versehen vorgenommen haben.
eggie (2017-09-24 06:25:01+00:00): Ik kijk even naar je edits en voer wat herstelwerkzaamheden uit. Sla pas op als je zeker bent dat het goed is. Nu heb je per ongeluk de Waterlooze Werve over de bebouwing heen getrokken.
Zie de hyperlink van achavi. 
 Ook zitten er paden vast aan de landuse. Dat is ongewenst.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52315924
eggie (2017-09-24 06:30:57+00:00): straat van bebouwing gehaald en teruggelegd. pad losgemaakt van landuse.
eggie (2017-09-24 06:56:43+00:00): De straatnamen heb ik ook verbeterd en deels veranderd in highway=residential. Het fietspad bij de rotonde loopt hier ook aan de zuidkant. Ik dacht dat dat niet meer het geval was. Weet je dat toevallig als lokale mapper? De rotonde voor fietsers is dacht ik ook anders nu.
eggie (2017-09-24 07:27:31+00:00): fietspad rotonde en Pekelingseweg aangepast mbv kadaster pdok 2016 luchtfoto.
aharvey (2017-09-28 07:04:20+00:00): I'm +1 for this, if these recurrent SEO operators still can't get the tagging syntax right and don't bother replying to changeset comments then by all means remove tags which are invalid and create a mess in OSM.

I wish these operators would use the same username rather than creating a new user for each business they try to SEO.
paulmach (2017-10-03 00:47:04+00:00): Hi, noticed that in this changeset a "commercial area" got edited in a weird way.  I haven't fixed it yet, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377428672#map=15/37.3157/-122.0229

I've been using osm inspector to find "self overlapping ways" and noticed this and another similar error that I think you did (can't find the changeset, but I fixed it).

Just wanted to leave a friendly note to watch out for things like this. :)
Luke W (2017-10-13 03:39:57+00:00): Hi! Thanks for catching this and fixing it. I'm not sure how I edited it falsely. This must have been during an upload of San Jose's sidewalks network. Project #127. @3vivekb
opendcc (2017-09-24 06:09:35+00:00): Ui, habe ich da doch etwas Wald gefällt ... danke.
3vivekb (2017-09-25 17:27:36+00:00): I think i'm going to revert this change.
b-jazz (2018-10-16 21:38:22+00:00): Why is this tagged as a nuclear explosion site? Are you saying that when I get my car washed at Bubbles Hand Wash nearby, they are using radioactive water?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-13 14:14:08+00:00): @b-jazz I've changed this to a more sensible tag.  Are you aware of any other problem changes like this that might need fixing?  Recent changes by this user do look OK.
b-jazz (2019-01-13 19:13:52+00:00): I'm unaware of any. I'm not sure why I didn't change this myself either, so thanks for taking care of the update.
lfemak (2017-09-23 22:47:09+00:00): +ways
benshapiro (2017-10-16 16:28:02+00:00): Reverted; Bullis Charter School is not a nuclear explosion site.
Minh Nguyen (2017-09-30 21:28:12+00:00): By the way, according to http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/127, the intention was for you to replace “YOUR COMMENTS” without your own comments about what you’ve done for this task, for example “Imported sidewalks and connected them to existing roads”.
Nakaner (2017-10-15 22:12:00+00:00): Hi JRichardson,

please pause this import and read my posting on the Imports mailing list. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October/005183.html

Could you please add a note to the profile of this account whom this account belongs to?

Best regards

Michael
Arlas (2017-09-25 11:44:06+00:00): someone here in Spain should check all this deletions
RicoElectrico (2017-09-24 10:41:41+00:00): Cześć, przeciągnąłeś omyłkowo wierzchołek strumienia dużo za daleko. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52317366#map=18

Nie widzę w sumie też jaki odcinek drogi nie istnieje, bo tylko ten strumień zedytowałeś. Wycofuję tę zmianę. Powiedz  która droga nie istnieje, to pomogę ją skasować.

Jeśli masz inne pytania, też śmało pisz. Albo wpadnij na polskie forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
UltimateRiff (2017-09-24 00:18:47+00:00): Forgot to add sources: survey, areal imagery, and the Chick-fil-A website
lfemak (2017-09-24 00:36:43+00:00): wrong comment, meant "+way"
user_5359 (2017-09-24 06:44:33+00:00): Hallo, ein existierender Name eines Hauses wird normalerweise mit addr:housename gekennzeichnet. Allerdings ist Vereinshaus kein name sondern eine Beschreibung. Bitte lies Dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:community_centre durch, da dürfte das passende dabei sein.
osmbuildings (2017-09-24 08:13:38+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es geändert.
benshapiro (2017-10-16 16:28:16+00:00): Reverted; this is not a nuclear explosion site
PierZen (2017-10-10 20:39:59+00:00): Bonjour Yan, à mon avis tu as mal interprété la clé motorway_link. On l'utilise seulement pour les bretelles qui communiquent entre une autoroute et les chemins avoisinants. Le boulevard au bas de l'autoroute ne devrait pas être classé avec la clé motorway_link. Je t'invites à revenir au statut avant tes modifications ou à tout le moins venir en discuter sur la liste talk-ca.
Martin868 (2017-11-20 18:56:10+00:00): Je suis a priori d'accord avec ce commentaire. Le choix de tout mettre en motorway_link me semble pas judicieux et demande d'être reconsidéré. Ceci est vrai pour tous les changements similaires sur les autoroutes montréalaises.
PierZen (2017-11-20 19:20:15+00:00): Je n'avais pas observé que fait systématiquement. Je vois aussi changeset #52317852 Boulevard Décarie  , Changeset  #52332790 Boul. Louis-H.-Lafontaine.

Étant donné que non réponse depuis un mois, je vais contacter la liste talk-ca pour discuter des corrections à apporter.
Felipe Rc (2017-10-01 22:40:00+00:00): AstroEsfericaSep2017UD
Nakaner (2017-10-19 10:28:34+00:00): Hi DLOK,

you imported lots of unconnected sidewalks in this import. I am writing you because I emailed to the imports mailing list and have asked some other users who participated in this import to pause the import and fix all errors. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October/005183.html

I do not want to wait longer and see how bad pedestrian routing with OSM data became due to your import. It was better before!

Could you please fix your import until 2017-10-21 20:00 UTC? Otherwise I will revert your part of the import because people rely on the quality of OSM and low-quality imports like yours don't help OSM.

Best regards

Michael
mikelmaron (2017-10-19 16:49:24+00:00): @Nakaner -- You are not in position to demand fixes and threaten reverts. We do not deal with each other in this way in our community -- we work with each other to make a better map, in good faith. From what I can see, your concerns are understood, discussion is happening, and things are moving.
If you have an issue with this, please take it up officially with the DWG.
DLOK (2017-10-19 21:27:14+00:00): Hmm.. clarify: The direction given at the time was only to check these lines against aerial imagery ensuring they represent sidewalks, and not getting onto roadways and ends at where sidewalks end (thus they would not be necessary connected); then import them. This was based on verbal directions and steps on the given instruction sheet.. Also, not all lines from the data set being looked at are necessary connected.. There were NO mentioning or indication these sidewalk lines are being used/treated or intended to be used as network routes in the instructions. On the instruction sheet, there were no requirement  to connect these sidewalk lines as network routes.  Just try to help and follow the directions given. Hope this provides some clarity.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-10-20 09:14:51+00:00): Hi @DLOK, it's always good to get feedback from what people were were advised. Yes the OSM database is used for many things, rendering the map, and making routing/navigation. Some of the things you added here can break that, which is what Nakaner is referring to. It's probably good to ensure that, in future, you be aware of routing and ensure your improvements are improvements from all perspectives. 🙂
3vivekb_sjsidewalks_import (2017-10-16 05:33:59+00:00): This edit shifted the map in this area. It was reverted in #52320030.
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:43:20+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Yi-Hua Liang (2017-09-24 03:48:51+00:00): 誤觸電纜線，要怎麼取消那個修改啊？
Johnbo (2022-05-09 10:15:55+00:00): Hello Maggie.

It is preferable not to mix editions from several states or even countries in the same changeset: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:34:10+00:00): Olá, JanserHK.
Nesta sua edição você criou uma proibição de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
imagico (2017-10-23 15:13:10+00:00): Hello Dave,

i would advise against trying to map features where you have nothing even close to verifiable position data for.

The location of node 5125769091 is a highly unlikely position for an islet or even a gravel bar based on the sea ice movement in the area - ice would not be able to move across such a feature freely - but it does in the area.

There are lots of well verifiable features missing in the north of Greenland in OSM - lets concentrate on those and not on data of questionable reliability like this.
AlaskaDave (2017-10-23 23:58:03+00:00): Ordinarily, I would agree with you. I came across Shea's description through a newspaper article I read that mentioned Stray Dog West. When I searched for it on OSM, nothing came up and I wanted to at least put a findable entry into Nominatum. The uncertainty of the position is why I added the fixme tag.

I will remove it if you insist but would prefer to leave it there until future imagery allows better placement.
imagico (2017-10-24 08:29:42+00:00): This is just my assessment of the situation - i won't insist on changing anything here.  But i am pretty sure the position is wrong, not wrong by a few hundred meters but wrong by likely many kilometers - either much closer to the shore or much further to the east (that is the problem with secondary sources - you have this kind of error in Wikipedia all the time).

Regarding future improvements - it is unlikely that when suitable images are available for the area such a volatile feature still exists.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-26 14:40:20+00:00): Hello samuelrussell. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5125789083 you have tagged `road_sign:backward` instead of `traffic_sign:backward`, right? #typo
CloCkWeRX (2017-09-27 02:59:18+00:00): I've tagged this as au:R2-20 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Australia)
samuelrussell (2017-09-27 03:41:03+00:00): Great work! But how do we deal with W1-1 and W1-1 having the same code but being left and right turns respectively?
TheSwavu (2017-09-27 23:57:21+00:00): 1. W1-1(L) and W1-1(R). Sometimes written as W1-1L but more common to have parentheses.

2. alpha-2 codes are upper-case so AU not au.

3. Rather than "road_sign:backward" would be better as a note.
3vivekb_sjsidewalks_import (2017-10-16 05:34:13+00:00): This reverted edit #52319071
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-24 05:40:14+00:00): Arggh, I forgot that search & replace by JOSM replaces in entire dataset, not only just what is on the screen.

Sorry for planet-wide bbox.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-24 06:50:55+00:00): OK, now entire changeset is verified.
pnorman (2017-10-01 23:15:24+00:00): Living streets here surprises me since they're normally used where there are traffic problems - are you sure they're not residential roads or service roads?
Arlas (2017-09-25 11:34:34+00:00): qui hai cancellato i cassonetti che sono presenti. Perché?
Arlas (2017-09-25 11:33:45+00:00): qui hai cancellato i cassonetti che ancora ci sono. Perché?
woodpeck (2017-10-04 11:34:48+00:00): Hallo Georg, bitte beachte die Regeln für "mechanisches Editieren". Diese besagen, dass man nicht "blind" an Objekten herumbasteln soll. Du bist ein erfahrener Mapper, wenn Du hier genau hingeschaut hättest, hättest Du gemerkt, dass (1) ein unsinniges Tag "orden" benutzt wurde, (2) die Länge mit 5 Nachkommastellen angegeben wurde, (3) dieser "Stream" sich mit einem "River" überlappt - und ganz nebenbei die komplette Umgebung hier auch mit Unsinnsdaten voll war. Nun hast Du aber einfach ohne hinzuschauen das "lenght" in "length" geändert und damit nicht nur das Problem weniger offensichtlich gemacht - nun denkt auch jeder "ah, das Objekt ist zuletzt von einem Benutzer mit einer 5stelligen Zahl Edits bearbeitet worden, da ist sicher alles mit in Ordnung"... also: Augen auf beim Editieren in fernen Landen! (Die source-Angabe "esri world image" ist auch unzutreffend, dieser Layer hat in dieser Gegend keine Bilder.)
freebeer (2017-10-04 15:55:19+00:00): Hallo 'peck,
ESRI has imagery up to zoomlevel 17 here.
Looks (quickly) the same as Bing, without the artificial overzoom to z19.
Which also seems the same as DigitalGlobe Premium, with a different overzoom process (blocky instead of blurry).
Nonetheless, the area looks like a mess seen by me in Potlatch2 -- hundreds of orphan nodes, duplicates, poor alignment...
(self-debates, should I bother to do anything in the area...)
freebeer (2017-10-04 16:30:00+00:00): Sorry to reply, but after posting I downloaded some history and remember this is a controversial import being reverted.
Not only do all the now-length entries have 5-decimal precision, but many are identical, when I measure nearly 100m for some.
I would guess (why would I even bother?) these are an attempt to fill out a high-water boundary where the riverbed widens.
And the nameless nodes are perhaps (but why?) SRTM data.
I've chosen to keep my hands away, and not make work more difficult for you.  Not even to touch name:fr ...
Sorry for adding noise.  Good luck getting cooperation from those responsible for this load of rubbish...
Ihr
Freibier
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-25 19:01:42+00:00): Hello claysmalley. At your blog you haven't mentioned, that you will introduce the new and so far unkown and undocumented key `frontage_road`. Is this key really necessary? #newkey
clay_c (2017-09-26 17:28:43+00:00): Ah, I should mention that. I chose to add it because most of these frontage roads are already marked as `note=frontage`. I didn't like that it was taking over the `note` tag, but I didn't want to delete useful information, so I moved the information to a new tag. I'm okay with having a critical discussion of this if you have any concerns.
eggie (2017-09-24 08:09:10+00:00): Beste Arno .. een gebouw heeft geen adresgegevens. En de naam van het gebouw is niet QiZiNi. 
Info graag op de BAG adresnode zetten. Een reactie wordt op prijs gesteld.... dan kunnen we ook assistentie verlenen.
eggie (2017-09-24 08:17:12+00:00): Alleen een naam is niet voldoende.. ik heb office=yes toegevoegd en de naam op de node gezet. adresgegevens verwijderd van gebouw. Een lege node heb ik verwijderd. Probeer je in te lezen in de regels van OSM: 
Nuttige links. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM (een introductiepagina met veel nuttige tips onder het kopje 'Waar moet je op letten als je de kaart gaat bewerken?') http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features (overzicht van vrijwel alle elementen die in OSM gebruikt worden) https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 (Nederlandstalig deel van forum; de plek om vragen te stellen en ideeën op te doen)
eggie (2017-09-24 08:37:11+00:00): PB gestuurd met verzoek om reactie op de meldingen van mapppers.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-24 07:36:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52311565, 52311919.
borishag (2017-09-26 07:50:33+00:00): Beste Mapper,

De naam van ICI PARIS XL dient in hoofdletters geschreven te worden, ook heb je de naam van de Operator verwijderd. 
B. Hageman Editor AS Watson Stores
majid1359 (2017-09-24 07:40:30+00:00): ایستگاه اتوبوس از این قسمت جمع شد
fgouget (2017-12-03 18:17:57+00:00): Merci d'avoir ajouté le nom en Occitan dans le champ name:oc.

Par contre le champ name ne doit contenir que le nom officiel, et donc, pour Marseille, en Français.

Pour avoir une carte qui affiche les noms en Occitan ce qu'il faudrait c'est monter un serveur dédié comme l'ont fait les Bretons :
http://kartenn.openstreetmap.bzh
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-26 14:37:19+00:00): Hallo Pfadfinder2013. Bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5125956027 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318716821 hast du den neuen Key `notiz` eingeführt. Wenn es eine Notiz an andere Mapper ist, dann wäre es `note`. Wenn es eher eine Beschreibung für die Allgemeinheit ist, dann wäre es `description` ;-)
PS: Und weil ich es gerade in deiner Historie sehe: Aussagekräftige Changeset Kommentare sind sehr wünschenswert ;-)
SafwatHalaby (2017-09-25 05:36:00+00:00): Track with sidewalk?
zstadler (2017-10-15 20:08:39+00:00): Which element are you referring to?
Did i create it?
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-17 06:13:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222996942
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527217866
zstadler (2017-10-17 11:55:20+00:00): The sidewalk tag was there when I've split the way in order to correct the junction geometry. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52322050
.
The history at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527217866/history shows that the tag was part of the creation of the way, done over 4 years ago by Konstantin86 in Changeset #16277360
.
Konstantin86 is no longer an active OSM contributor. I think it's safe to delete the sidewalk tag.
user_4493657 (2017-09-24 17:23:47+00:00): Cześć Kolego! Witam wśród maperów. Dziękuje, za dokładne opisy zmian. Pozwoliłem sobie poprawić asfaltową drogę na pole na podstawie info zawartych w wiki OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:tracktype
Masz pytania? śmiało pytaj tu, na forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23, na czatach(np: https://webchat.oftc.net/?randomnick=0&channels=osm-pl&uio=d4 )
Pozdrawiam.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-09-25 07:48:11+00:00): Hi futurumspes, please do not enter keys like "bicycle=" = "yes". 1x "=" is enough!!
This happens nearly every day since some time.
Thanks, Alex
R0bst3r (2017-09-24 21:22:05+00:00): Hallo bittling,
den Key "dead end" gibt es nicht bei OSM, normale Sackgassen werden nicht als solche gekennzeichnet. Nur strickte Sackgassen, also ohne Weiterführung auch für Fußgänger etc., erhalten ein noxeit=yes am letzten Punkt der Straße.
Viele Grüße
opendcc (2017-09-24 09:06:47+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast da die Straße bei Heiderl als asphaltiert gekennzeichnet. Wann wurde das asphaltiert?

Servus
gf2009d (2017-09-24 16:19:59+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Da habe ich die falsche Straße selektiert und daraufhin "korrigiert"! Mache ich wieder rückgängig
yaugenka (2017-10-01 17:31:24+00:00): Hi. Can you tell why this hamlet was changed to suburb?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1670519816
Jay May (2017-10-02 05:42:00+00:00): Because it is a suburb and not a village. When you drive there, the Narbuty village limit is precisely where Zarečča is mapped.
Jay May (2017-10-02 06:10:56+00:00): Now, you are welcome to revert the changes you made.
yaugenka (2017-10-02 17:16:30+00:00): All our official documents say that Заречье is a separate hamlet. Did you ask people if the hamlets were united into one? It is possible that the sign was put into wrong place.
utack (2017-09-24 10:49:18+00:00): Terassenufer bis Käthe Kollwitz Ufer sieht jetzt korrekt aus, danke
dgitto (2017-09-24 20:21:16+00:00): Ciao, ma questa entità non ha DUG? Vicolo, via, ecc?
Cascafico (2017-09-25 05:55:02+00:00): Non so: se vedi history non c'era. Non posso inventare
dgitto (2017-09-25 06:52:52+00:00): Certo. Scusa. In effetti non ho pc e non ho indagato bene dal cellulare. Era giusto per chiedere, non si sa mai.
DaveF (2017-09-24 11:45:18+00:00): To check, are these permanent?
AlanStans (2017-09-24 12:44:20+00:00): Yes,  They move around slightly but stay in front of the M Shed.  Have been there for some years!  They belong to the museum.
(Need to add John King (Tug) at some time.
DaveF (2017-09-24 12:51:00+00:00): Good. Is the Balmoral still there? It's a bit of a big ship for me to have missed the last time I walked past.
AlanStans (2017-09-24 13:05:22+00:00): It's currently away for the summer cruising program.  Due back in October for the winter.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-24 13:29:45+00:00): Pozdrawiam! Miło widzieć że ktoś jeszcze usuwa błędne nazwy opisowe.
Teiron (2017-09-24 13:48:38+00:00): Dzięki :)
user_5359 (2017-09-24 15:42:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
maraf24 (2017-09-24 20:43:16+00:00): Żabka to w osm shop=convenience i można go znaleźć w edytorze wpisując po prostu "żabka".
BCNorwich (2017-10-01 12:19:10+00:00): Hello, your recently added path Capital Ring (527240440, v1) is a duplication of an existing path and the section that you duplicated are part of the existing Capital Ring (Section 1) route relation. So the way Capital Ring is mapped.
I have deleted the duplication.
Regards Bernard
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-26 14:49:46+00:00): Hello ITineris. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4719363595 you have tagged `toliets:wheelchair` instead of `toilets:wheelchair`, right? #typo
itineris (2017-09-26 17:44:09+00:00): Sure.
eggie (2017-09-24 11:11:29+00:00): Adressen zitten nooit op gebouwen zelf. Die horen op de adresnode. Het gebouw staat ook nog steeds op construction.
eggie (2017-09-24 11:22:46+00:00): Alle info overgezet naar BAG adresnode 1
maraf24 (2017-09-24 20:45:00+00:00): Hej. Dwie sprawy a propo nazwy "uwaga pociągi i pszejscie tlko dla pracowników.
1. to nie jest nazwa przejścia, ale komentarz
2. "przejście" a nie "pszejscie", "tylko" a nie "tlko"
eggie (2017-09-24 11:13:33+00:00): Adressen staan als het goed is al op de adresnode en horen niet op het gebouw zelf te worden getagd. De finctie van het gebouw hoort niet als name= getagd te worden.

Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-09-24 11:21:15+00:00): adressen verwijderd.. reeds aanwezig.. functie op note gezet
eggie (2017-09-24 11:22:11+00:00): Op de adresnode kan nog de aard van het gebouw gezet worden amenity=?? Zie wiki.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-24 18:28:30+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527244266#map=16/24.7647/43.8673 is?  You've added it as "coastline" here which seems unlikely.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-09-24 18:29:11+00:00): مرحبا ومرحبا بكم في خريطة الشارع المفتوح!
هل يمكنك شرح ما هو https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527244266#map=16/24.7647/43.8673؟ لقد أضفته ك "ساحل" هنا يبدو غير محتمل.
تحياتي الحارة،
أندي
BCNorwich (2017-09-25 06:02:03+00:00): Please understand that Way 527116798 is a duplication of highway 411.
josmougn (2017-11-26 20:58:50+00:00): pourquoi avoir enlevé ref=91-10 et note="albatrans massy tgv" et operator=STIF sur le point https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2812709934 ?
merci,