piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_7622 (2017-01-23 07:19:51+00:00): Hallo!
Hier sind keinerlei Bautätigkeiten zu sehen. Aus früheren Diskussionen (z.B. im Kommentar von woodpeck von der DWG in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34352622 oder aus der Forumsdiskussion in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52342) müßtest du noch wissen, daß erst wenn die 'Bagger rollen' von proposed auf construction umgetaggt werden soll. Darum bitte ich dich deine dem Bauzustand vorgreifenden Änderungen rückgängig zu machen.
user_242798 (2017-02-12 11:01:58+00:00): Osmose Error: Invalid postcode "1703 SH;1703SH" for country code NL.
Preferred postal code (BAG import) = "1703SH". So correction is suggested, not Error value + Correct value.
Why was name for shop deleted? Shop without name is not correct.
Why was phone deleted? (preferred is contact: phone).
Why was opening_hours deleted?
maxerickson (2017-02-02 13:53:04+00:00): Hi-

The tag "access=yes" on this footway:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45098306

Doesn't really mean anything. The default access= state for any highway is yes.

horse=no and motor_vehicle=no are also quite redundant on a way tagged highway=cycleway/footway/path (as the widespread default assumption is that they are both no for those types). There is no need to add them.

Another problematic combination of tags is highway=cycleway and cycleway=track. cycleway=track is meant to indicate that there is a separated cycle track associated with some other way. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway for more. Data consumers will just ignore it, but it does imply that there are 2 cycleways when it is tagged on a highway=cycleway and will be confusing to new mappers.


Thanks,

Max
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:28:04+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
k_zoar (2017-01-27 02:46:37+00:00): こんにちは。

こちらの変更セットで編集された内容を、編集前の状態に巻き戻させていただきました。
地理院地図(https://goo.gl/n59XfK)や Bing Map(https://goo.gl/PiiBHW) でこのような橋が確認できなかったためです。

OpenStreetMap は事実情報を記載する場所で、編集されたデータは世界中の人々が利用しています。 
操作のミスで意図しない編集を行ってしまった場合には編集データをアップロードしないようお願いいたします。 
また、実験的な編集や練習をされる場合にはテスト編集用サンドボックスをご利用いただくか、お手元で環境を構築してから実施されるようお願いいたします。 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/

編集の方法等について不明な点がある場合にはメーリングリスト(https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja)などの日本語コミュニティへご連絡ください。
Mapeiro (2017-01-23 11:39:49+00:00): Olá,

Não devem haver informações duplicadas no mapa. Com essa edição, o endereço "Rua Joaquim Nabuco, 289" está duplicado. Ele existe em um node colocado no meio da rua Joaquim Nabuco e também no polígono com nome "Residencial Liboni".

Imagino que o ponto colocado no meio da rua tenha sido um erro de edição.
Valéria Dev BR (2017-01-23 11:41:46+00:00): Você está certo! Há uma forma de dizer em qual ponto o 289 fica?
Mapeiro (2017-01-23 11:43:03+00:00): Como você já colocou o endereçco do 289 na área entitulada "Residencial Liboni", você pode apagar esse ponto que ficou no meio da rua
Mapeiro (2017-01-23 11:55:37+00:00): Outra coisa. a tag "building" (clique em "all tags no editor Id para ver") é usada para mapear o contorno de uma edificação. Nesse caso específico, building=apartments para mapear o contorno de um edifício de apartamentos.
Da maneira como você mapeou, é como se toda a área do condomínio (incluindo estacionamentos e todos os prédios) fosse um único, e enorme, edifício.

Se você quer marcar a área de um condomínio, acho que a tag mais adequada seria "Residential Area" (landuse=residential ao invés de building=apartments).

Aí dentro dessa área residencial, que contém o nome e endereço do condomínio, você poderia, se quiser, mapear os contornos dos edifícios contidos nele.

Veja como foi feito no Sesc Joinville, por exemplo (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266634566).

Quaisquer dúvidas quanto a que tag usar, clique no "i" para ver explicações no wiki do OpenStreetMap.

Obrigado por contribuir com o mapa!
Valéria Dev BR (2017-01-23 11:57:29+00:00): Muito obrigado, vou alterar isso já!
k_zoar (2017-01-23 04:17:04+00:00): こんにちは。
初めての編集お疲れ様でした、しかし残念ながら今回の編集によって道路のネットワークが一部破壊されてしまいました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.09800/139.37026
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.10470/139.36845

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/127374614
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/141600573

OpenStreetMap は事実情報を記載する場所で、編集されたデータは世界中の人々が利用しています。
操作のミスで意図しない編集を行ってしまった場合には編集データをアップロードしないようお願いいたします。
また、実験的な編集や練習をされる場合にはテスト編集用サンドボックスをご利用いただくか、お手元で環境を構築してから実施されるようお願いいたします。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/

ブラウザで編集するエディタは日本語での解説記事がありますのでこちらもご覧ください。
http://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/id-editor/

道路ネットワークを修復する編集はできますでしょうか?
日本語コミュニティへ依頼してデータの復元をすることができます。こちらの「議論」の機能や OSM のメッセージ機能でご連絡いただけましたら幸いです。
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-23 17:33:50+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45383135
k_zoar (2017-01-23 23:55:37+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch. Thanks for revert!
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-24 17:29:02+00:00): @k_zoar sorry, this is the correct revert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45383470) by contributor https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E7%9D%A1%E7%9C%A0%E6%99%82%E9%96%93

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45383470
k_zoar (2017-01-26 03:54:07+00:00): I did not notice such the way objects.
I think the rollback was better than contact to mapper. Because I saw that URI.
MAPconcierge (2017-02-01 04:14:50+00:00): Thanks for great support from mappers. I guess, this newbie mapper is RISSHO University's student. Already, I've reported this edit to Teacher of RISSHO university. 
We will make OSM class educational relationship in Japan.
user_5359 (2017-01-23 21:13:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please give me some more information about the context of comment and your changes.
mueschel (2017-01-25 12:31:45+00:00): Hi,
may I point you to this proposal for mapping lane connections?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/transit
It's 'just' a proposal, but already used in some places.
Cheers, Jan
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:59:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Najd ALHanahnah (2017-01-23 04:20:50+00:00): finished
az09 (2017-03-20 04:00:06+00:00): Статусы этих улиц кмк завышены.
poornibadrinath (2017-01-23 06:46:49+00:00): Hi SuffolkNY,
  I came across your edits and noticed that the buildings imported have only nodes. Please clarify what is the issue and correct them. Thanks.
Best,
Poornima Badrinath
AlexCleary (2017-01-24 14:52:05+00:00): Hi,
That happens sometimes during upload problems or when you check changes just a few minutes after the upload when the new data is not fully synchronized.
I'll check it and give you a feedback.
Best, Michael
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:59:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:56:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:54:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:52:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did youe see the area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37063023 ? Your entry is a duplicate entry. And please check your comment: You live in a park?
ediyes (2017-01-25 16:48:23+00:00): Hi there,

Has movido esta calle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139486482/history por favor, puede revertir el cambio?
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:47:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:47:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Commodoortje (2017-01-23 09:56:17+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-23 09:58:43+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik wat overbodige tags van de aangebrachte weg verwijderd.
Ook heb ik het nieuwe pand aan de Kloosterlaan ingebracht. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467938951
eest9 (2017-02-02 12:29:08+00:00): Warum wurde auch foot=yes auch entfernt? Und ist davon auszugenen, dass diesen Weg jeder benützen darf? Wenn ja warum wurde dann access=no nicht durch access=public ersetzt sondern gelöscht?
toc-rox (2017-02-02 15:50:39+00:00): Inzwischen wurde der Weg von highway=footway auf highway=path umgetaggt ... was für einen Waldweg vermutlich auch passender ist. Zur Ausgangsfrage: highway=footway impliziert die allgemeine und ausschließliche Nutzung durch Fußgänger. Gruß Klaus
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:44:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:43:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:38:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
BCNorwich (2017-01-23 08:44:33+00:00): Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You've placed that unnamed bank on a residential street. I don't think there's a bank close by so I'll remove the POI.
If you can give more details and a better position please please make the addition and if I can help please just ask.
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:37:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
rene78 (2017-01-24 17:52:29+00:00): Did this new coast road around the airport already open? I thought only in June this year?
dinastik (2017-01-25 09:11:51+00:00): Sorry for this. I edited the map halfway. Have been re-edit some [art of the road back to under construction. Thanks for voicing out about this.
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:29:47+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:29:30+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
Myazyk (2017-01-24 11:32:28+00:00): Ти впевнений щодо адреси хати Залізничний провулок 10? Не Грушевського 178?
Hjart (2017-01-23 11:01:54+00:00): Jeg må lige gøre opmærksom på at din anvendelse af f.eks. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dindustrial er ukorrekt og at der specifikt advares mod sådan ukorrekt anvendelse af diverse tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
RoterEmil (2017-01-23 08:05:17+00:00): wrong CS comment: solved problems detected by JOSM not by Osmose
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:26:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! please check the value of tag cuisine. Value local or mexican?

If you need help: You are welcome!
Johnny Carlsen (2017-01-27 17:23:52+00:00): I just noticed that you are still tagging residential roads as highway=service, please tag them as highway=residential.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
Johnny Carlsen (2017-01-27 17:27:18+00:00): Here are a couple of examples:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467919873
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467919857
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:24:27+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Владимир К (2017-01-23 11:43:25+00:00): вы улицу поломали
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77714990#map=15/55.7880/49.1254

и дом
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90178076#map=19/55.79377/49.11094

и название "дом на даурской" сомнительное
mavl (2019-01-14 16:38:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:28:52+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:32:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If your business is a restaurant (I have trouble to connect with your homepage), than add ameinty=restaurant and cuisine=thai (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine). 

If you need help:You are welcome!
Владимир К (2017-01-23 11:45:09+00:00): не надо на писать "магазин" в название
mueschel (2017-01-25 12:24:02+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier sehr viele Häuser mit dem Tag "Wirling  = 8" hochgeladen, kannst du das korrigieren?

Gruß, Jan
gerhard81 (2017-01-25 15:13:00+00:00): Hallo Jan! Danke ans aufmerksam machen. Ich kümmere mich die Tage darum.
Grüße Gerhard
mavl (2019-01-14 16:38:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2017-01-23 20:24:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
ToniE (2017-01-23 10:24:53+00:00): Hallo x_zhao,

Du hast hier 47 Relationen gelöscht und nicht korrigiert (wie's im Kommentar steht).
War das Absicht, die zu löschen?
Gibt es für die Relationen Ersatzt, d.h. wirst Du neue Relationen erstellen, und die entsprechende Seite im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen/Transportation) updaten?

Ich sehe das Löschen dieser Bus-Relationen sehr kritisch, das geht viel Arbeit (auch meine Arbeit) verloren.

Was ist der Grund dieses Relationen zu löschen?

Ich würde es begrüßen, solche Löschaktionen vorher auf Talk-DE oder in der Bayern-Liste zu diskutieren.

Gruß,
Toni
x_zhao_MENTZ (2017-01-23 13:11:28+00:00): Hallo, ich habe die Extra-Relationen der Buslinien gelöscht, weil ich zum Bearbeiten Kopien der Relationen angelegt habe.  Aber die Relationen bestehen in meinem Relationen Editor Fenster jetzt. 
Vg,
X.Zhao
ToniE (2017-01-23 14:57:33+00:00): Hallo X. Zhao,

hmm, dagegen wäre nichts einzuwenden, solange das Wiki danach entsprechend aktualisiert wird.

Ich befürchte aber, dass die Extra-Relationen noch existieren und die Original-Relationen gelöscht wurden.
Zumindest die Relation 2366035 (die 4. hier) ist schon recht alt.
Meine Befürchtung stützt sich auf einen kurzen Test auf der Seite
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen/Transportation
wo ich z.B. beim 195er/198er keinen Erfolg bei den dort angegeben 3 Relation hatte (von Dir zum Teil vor einem Monat bzw. vor 6 Stunden gelöscht).
Daher nochmal meine Frage: wirst Du die Seite 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen/Transportation
nach Abschluss Deiner Arbeiten wieder aktualisieren?

Gruß,
Toni
Rainero (2017-01-23 20:35:10+00:00): Hallo Toni,
evtl. habe ich durch meinen Kommentar beim Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44541589 den Anstoß gegeben?
Ich hatte nur einen POI in Trudering aktualisiert und bin durch JOSM Fehlermeldungen auf mehrfache Busrelationen und drei Minirelationen ohne Rolle gestoßen.

Servus,
Rainer
ToniE (2017-01-23 20:58:55+00:00): Hallo Rainer,hallo X. Zhao,

versteht mich bitte nicht falsch. Ich finde es sehr gut, dass das Thema ÖPNV in München nun in professionelleren Händen liegt als es vorher war.
Ich begrüße ausdrücklich, dass sich Mentz und MVV und ... auf OSM als Basis stürzen und das Thema ÖPNV hier vorantreiben. 
Das Wiki (München/Transportation) war bisher auch nicht gut gepflegt, was ja jeden Dezember zu tun wäre. 
Da gibts z.B. noch Verweise auf Relationen, die vor 2 Jahren gelöscht wurden.
Da auch ich schon eine Menge Arbeit ins Wiki rein gesteckt hatte war ich jetzt enttäuscht, dass es - meinem Gefühl nach - endgültig nicht mehr zur Dokumentation taugt.

Meine Frage ist nun, sollen wir das Wiki (München/Transportation) fallen lassen und den Profis das Feld überlassen? Das hätte auch sehr viele Vorteile.
Sollen wir das Wiki neu und automatisiert aufbauen und dabei den Bearbeitungsstatus raus lassen, uns quasi nur auf Informationen aus der OSM-DB stützen? Das Wiki quasi als tabellarisches Abbild der Route-Relationen?
Wer machts? Wie gehts am besten? Wer entscheidet es?

Servus,
Toni
Rainero (2017-01-24 10:15:16+00:00): Hallo Toni,

nein, ich verstehe deine Intention schon :)
Das Wiki (München/Transportation) war mir noch gar nicht bewußt. Ich werde in den nächsten Tagen mal wenigstens meine Änderungen, die ich kürzlich im zusammenhang mit der Tram25-Verlängerung gemacht habe, eintragen. Das waren meine ersten Schritte mit ÖPNV-Routenrelationen und ich fühle mich nun halbwegs fit, damit zu arbeiten, aber der MVV ist ja so groß, da wären die Profis gefragt ;)
Das Wiki zu automatisieren klingt für mich gut, ich wüßte nur nicht wie das zu machen wäre. Wäre das nicht ein gutes Thema für den nächsten Stammtisch in München?

Servus,
Rainer
ToniE (2017-01-24 13:32:05+00:00): Hallo Rainer,

> Wäre das nicht ein gutes Thema für den nächsten Stammtisch in München?

Durchaus, wir sollten dass dann auf der Bayern-Liste rechtzeitig ankündigen.

> Das Wiki zu automatisieren klingt für mich gut, ich wüßte nur nicht wie das zu machen wäre. 

Das könnte man ja auf dem OSM-Stammtisch diskutieren. U.U. (Ober-)Bayern-Snapshot von der Geofabrik (jede Nacht neu verfügbar)
runterladen und ein Skript (Perl, Python, ...) drüberlaufen lassen "Relation, route=bus/train/tram..., operator=Münch...
Und dann aufbereiten.

Gruß
Toni