piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
francians (2022-10-08 09:53:13+00:00): Grazie per aver risposto. Non credo che sia previsto di usare questa convenzione per inserire l'informazione. Immagino leggendo la wiki che vada invece fatta una relazione come indicato qui:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dmtb

e sui singoli tratti percorribili solo in un verso, aggiunto il ruolo forward/backward.

Fammi sapere se hai dubbi oppure vuoi una mano per capire le relazioni.
Grazie mille
Francesco
Palex63 (2022-10-08 10:30:04+00:00): Io non ho molto tempo per studiare le regole,puoi modificare tu e mettere il senso di marcia ai sentieri che ho modificato io?Poi in inglese capisco poco
francians (2022-10-09 06:46:09+00:00): Ciao Palex63,

ho creato una prima relazione per "Darkwood to taboga":

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14672937

ti invito a verificare che sia tutto corretto (era semplice, ma preferisco farti perdere 1 minuto per revisionare) i dati.

Per consultare le relazioni di tipo hiking/mtb ecc.. il consiglio è di usare WayMarkedTrails:

https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=14672937

perché mostra i dati OSM, oltre al profilo altimetrico e permette anche di scaricare i dati in formato gpx.
Fammi sapere cosa ne pensi
Grazie e buona domenica
Francesco
willkmis (2022-10-06 15:42:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding this shop. Rather than just adding shop=yes, it's helpful to add what type of shop it is. In this case, that would be shop=clothing, or possibly shop=wholesale + wholesale=clothing if this shop only sells things wholesale, i.e. not individually to the public. You can find a whole list of OSM shop values here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop?uselang=en#Shop-specific_information. Also, note that opening_hours in OSM have a precise, somewhat esoteric format they should be in, you can see the documentation here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en. For example, the hours you tagged here should read Mo-Fr 09:00-17:30.
Best,
Will
BlueButterfly (2022-10-21 17:45:41+00:00): Hello Panchito_de_GDL, Thanks for mapping! I am confused why you have reclassified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950203398 to “highway=motorway,” along with portions of all the connecting ways around this circular junction. According to the OSM Wiki page regarding motorways (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway), that highway classification is reserved for highways with controlled access. By definition, an at-grade junction such as this is not controlled access, and "highway=trunk" seems to be the most appropriate classification. Is there a particular reason why you reclassified these highway segments as you did?

I am also curious if you know the proper "junction" tag for this feature. Without ground-level imagery, I am not certain if it is best represented as "junction=circular" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular) or "junction=roundabout" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout). Do you know which tag would be better for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950203398? Regardless of which is more appropriate, both policy pages confirm the connecting highway classifications should remain consistent leading up to the junction, such as those modeled nearby (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260508527). The “highway=motorway”segments extending south and east of the junction seem inappropriate.

Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions!


Hola Panchito_de_GDL, ¡Gracias por mapear! No estoy seguro de por qué ha reclasificado https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950203398 como "highway=motorway", junto con partes de todas las vías de conexión alrededor de este cruce circular. De acuerdo con la página Wiki de OSM sobre autopistas (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway), esa clasificación de autopistas está reservada para autopistas con acceso controlado. Por definición, un cruce a-nivel como este no es uno de acceso controlado, y "highway=trunk" parece ser la clasificación más apropiada. ¿Hay alguna razón en particular por la que reclasificó estos segmentos de carretera como lo hizo?

También tengo curiosidad si conoce la etiqueta de "cruce" adecuada para este rasgo. Sin imágenes a nivel del suelo, no estoy seguro de si se representa mejor como "cruce=circular" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular) o "cruce=rotonda" (https:/ /wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout). ¿Sabe qué etiqueta sería mejor para https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950203398? Independientemente de cuál sea más apropiado, ambas páginas de políticas confirman que las clasificaciones de carreteras de conexión deben permanecer consistentes antes del cruce, como las que se modelan cerca (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260508527). Los segmentos de “carretera=autopista” que se extienden al sur y al este del cruce parecen inapropiados.

Gracias, y avísame si tienes alguna pregunta.
HellMap (2022-10-06 21:44:17+00:00): Hi! I see you changed a lot of roads from residential to living streets. Are they all in living zones now? Many form unusual (for typical living zone layouts) connections to other residential roads and you only specified aerial imagery as a source for your change, so I am wondering if you are certain about these?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127054883
Leicha (2022-11-11 14:46:41+00:00): Hi there sorry for late relpy.
Im not 100% that im using the correct description here, but yes the type of the roads are changed.
for example
https://www.valmieraszinas.lv/jauna-dzivojama-zona-burkanciema-beverinas-un-austrumu-ielas-krustojuma-mainas-izbrauksanas-kartiba/
HellMap (2022-11-11 15:31:33+00:00): Thanks for clarifying.

Yes, it looks like Valmiera has introduced a bunch of living zones https://www.valmierasnovads.lv/content/uploads/2021/07/satiksmes_komisija_dzivojama_zona21_kopejais.pdf

For reference, in Latvia, living streets `highway=living_street` are those in living zone - "Dzīvojamā zona" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Mazāki_ceļi , which is always marked with the blue children playing 533 traffic sign https://likumi.lv/wwwraksti/2015/121/BILDES/N_279/IMAGE196.JPG . So all streets within the zone should be tagged living streets and no streets outside such a zone should be tagged living streets.

Looking at the map, there are still a bunch of location where residential roads mix with living streets. There is no Mapillary footage and I haven't been there, so I cannot change anything. I also wouldn't want to use the official zone map because it could be incorrect.

Anyway, as long as you are aware of what the roads should be, that's fine and feel free to change them as needed.
silversurfer83 (2022-10-06 07:18:51+00:00): Moin Dirk,
du hast um Review gebeten.
Ist in dem Zaun denn ein Gatter? Falls ja, dann zeichne doch die Gatter noch ein (dort, wo der Zaun den Weg kreuzt, ein Punkt auf den Weg und barrier=gate). Wenn die Fläche aktuell einfach komplett mit dem Zaun abgesperrt ist, reicht an dem von dir bearbeiteten Weg ein einfaches access=no
Wenn da Gatter sind, die jemand mit Schlüssel öffnen kann, dann würde ich access=private setzen. Egal, welche Variante da passt, die diversen Verkehrsmittel können raus (also muss nicht für foot, bicycle, ...) jeweils was eigenes gesetzt werden.
Wenn du ganz viel Lust hast, zeichne den Zaun noch um die Waldfläche.
Geht da am südlichen Rand der Fläche ein Weg entlang? Sieht auf einem der Satbilder so aus, ist aber nicht eingezeichnet.
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127055648
Dirk_Hom (2022-10-08 11:44:55+00:00): Die Fläche ist komplett mit einem Wild-Maschendrahtzaum umrandet. Es ist also kein Zugang möglich. Ich habe doch schon den Eintrag "access=no" gesetzt, oder übersehe ich da noch etwas? Danke für die Hilfe.
Gruß Dirk
silversurfer83 (2022-10-08 14:17:35+00:00): Hallo Dirk
Wenn der Zaun komplett rum geht, ohne Gatter, dann passt access=no perfekt. Die anderen (foot, bicycle, horse,...) sind dann doppelt gemoppelt. So lange der Weg da noch irgendwie sichtbar ist, würde ich ihn auf jeden Fall auch in der Datenbank lassen.

Schönes Wochenende
Silversurfer83
MarkusHD (2022-10-17 10:22:49+00:00): 14 passt hier nicht ins Schema, das ist sicherlich ein Tippfehler.
Mashin (2022-10-15 09:52:50+00:00): Hi,
you were told multiple times to not create overlaps between green and fairway polygons, and to stop avoiding using of multipolygons by drawing the shape around bunkers. Please comply with the community rules.
highflyer74 (2022-10-18 19:31:39+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Danke für deinen gut gemeinten Beitrag. Bevor du loslegst, lies dir am besten einmal die unten verlinkten Dokumente durch, denn OSM ist komplexer, als du am Anfang denkst.

Ein wichtiger Aspekt: wir erfassen die Dinge nur einmal. Das griechische Restaurant ist bereits als Node (Punkt) erfasst. Dies ist die gängige Art, einen POI zu mappen. Es ist deshalb nicht notwendig, alle zum Restaurant gehörenden Elemente mit Daten des Restaurants zu versehen. Ich habe das entsprechend repariert.

Genereller Tipp: viel lesen, immer genau nachsehen, ob vielleicht etwas schon erfasst ist, langsam vorgehen und lieber einmal mehr andere Mitmapper fragen, wenn du dir nicht sicher bist, oder etwas Vorhandenes nicht verstehst.

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page

- https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich gern!
Frans S (2022-10-14 12:59:08+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway ---
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127056423
archpdx (2023-02-22 03:09:33+00:00): Please note that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM, see https://wiki.osm.org/Abbreviations

Also, it appears that you are editing on behalf of a company. If so, that's perfectly fine, but we require that you comply with OpenStreetMap's organized editing guidelines document the activities your company is doing on the wiki:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Kovoschiz (2023-09-17 04:09:51+00:00): If the eatery occupies the entire area, and the area has no other identity or info of its own, having `amenity=` on the area is correct. Especially as they should be `indoor=area` which should have another feature or feature-attribute tag to describe it, not `=room`.
andyonthewings (2023-09-17 10:15:56+00:00): Thanks for the comment. I've no strong preference for these.

There is indeed an odd case in which two businesses share an area though - KC Zenzero (node 10077786374) and The Young's Hainan Chicken (node 10077786374).

For the indoor tag, I have no idea which value is more suitable even after reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:indoor. There are walls between food counters, but I do agree =room is not accurate since they are not fully enclosed. FYI, the place looks like this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dragon_Centre_Food_Court_20110709.jpg
eggie (2022-10-05 17:12:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip...  office=it wordt het meest gebruikt volgens mij. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dit

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Tjuro (2022-10-05 17:25:23+00:00): Welkom Niek,

Met https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website kan je ook je website aan de node toevoegen

MVG Tjuro
eggie (2022-10-06 06:36:58+00:00): Niek... Ik heb office=company toegevoegd.. anders zie je geen naam renderen. 
MVG
eggie
mini-me (2025-09-09 02:34:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10077762669
🤔
DressyPear4 (2022-10-06 03:17:16+00:00): Olá, adicione uma descrição nas suas edições para que outros possam entender o que você está editando
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127057258
ticki_52 (2023-02-12 17:21:57+00:00): Hallo, bitte beachten, dass jede Hausnummer in ein und der selben Straße nur einmal vorkommen darf. Des weiteren handelt es bei diesem Gebäude vermutlich NCHT um ein "office". Bitte checken. Danke....

Gruß ticki_52
HerrPaul (2023-02-12 18:14:35+00:00): Danke hab versucht das rückgängig zu machen, und prüfe es bei Gelegenheit nochmal.
HellMap (2022-10-06 11:33:10+00:00): Please don't remove details by replacing multi-segment traffic islands with a pedestrian refuge with a single traffic island as with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101272518 . You can add `surface` to traffic island sections. In fact, `landuse=grass` is also not incorrect ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland#Tags_to_use_in_combination )

Also, as with other edits, please don't replace footways with sidewalks when they don't have any direct access to the road, like, for example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553534532 , which has a guard rail in between.
HellMap (2022-10-06 11:34:40+00:00): Also, as with another edit, you deleted cycleway tags from a cycleway to change it to sidewalk, like, for example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421653116 .
HellMap (2022-10-06 12:40:24+00:00): Also, please be careful not to connect individual physical features to boundaries, in this case railing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101272536 got connected to boundary https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199139718 .
noelbov (2022-10-09 15:45:17+00:00): Ce point-nœud ne fait-il pas partie du réseau Le Brabant wallon à vélo?
Et, quelle est votre source d'information?
Merci d'avance pour une réponse.

nb
martien-176 (2022-10-05 18:12:41+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Well mapped. Good location, square building corners and precise outline. 

Small point of attention: you mapped building=house in a few cases. As remote mappers we cannot know the functionality of buildings. So it is common practice to always use building=yes.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127059163
ezekielf (2022-10-06 20:24:17+00:00): Presumably you removed the name tag from this school building because you felt it was redundant to have the same name on the building and the grounds area.  However, now the address information is disconnected from the name and this is not an improvement.  One can only see that 170 Main Street is a generic school building, and the object named Main Street Middle School has no address.  Please preserve the address tags on the same object with the school name.  It is also fine, and not redundant, to have the same address tags on the building and the amenity=school area around it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127059198
user_2066394 (2022-10-05 20:02:12+00:00): Welche Bewertung könnte man aus der Versionsgeschichte ableiten?
Frans S (2022-10-14 12:58:20+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway ---
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127059771
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 05:27:19+00:00): Hi,

danke für die Änderung. Bezog sich dies auf die Häuser in der Schweiz,  in Algerien oder auf alle?  

Vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92932526
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101286263

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ezekielf (2022-10-06 20:14:55+00:00): Why did you delete the recreation ground another mapper added here?  The recreation fields near schools are often mapped this way here in Vermont.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127060671
HellMap (2022-10-06 11:10:48+00:00): When creating crossings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101290648 please don't replace `highway=cycleway` with `highway=footway`. It is still a cycleway and thus a cycleway crossing (with `cycleway=crossing`).
mueschel (2022-10-12 15:00:42+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what was wrong with all these landcover areas that made you delete them?
Gustavo22Soares (2022-10-12 16:16:59+00:00): Olá, o certo seria usar a tag natural=tree para mapear uma árvore e é aplamente ultizada em mapas de terceiro https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
A tag landcover=trees não foi aprovada e não é reconhecida, não recomendo o uso para que não aja conflitos futuramente
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover%3Dtrees
Espero ter esclarecido 
Obrigado
mueschel (2022-10-12 17:08:47+00:00): "landuse=trees" is used many thousand times in this way in many different places. I think that deleting all this data requires a discussion and agreement between mappers. Has there been any discussion on any of the common platforms? If not, I strongly recommend restoring all this information until a common consensus is found.
dentonny (2023-07-27 09:08:09+00:00): Dag Lowie,

Ik merk op dat je op een verkeerde manier parkings toevoegt. We maken hier zelden gebruik van een multipolygon.
De tag amenity=parking betreft het hele afgebakende gebied of met andere woorden: de buitenkant. Nadien kan je de amenity=parking_space toevoegen aan de parkeerplaatsen zelf als je wilt micromappen.
Op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:amenity=parking?uselang=nl kan je alles terugvinden.

Een klein voorbeeldje: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1131818603

Is het een grotere parkeerplaats met als tag parking=surface dan dien je deze ook nog te verbinden met een highway. Is dit een parking=street_side dan is dit niet nodig.

Heb je nog vragen/opmerkingen laat dit dan gerust weten.

mvg
dentonny
b-holdet (2022-10-08 05:14:02+00:00): Hej,

Hvorfor har du omdøbt "Ormerende" til "Ormerenden"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091998684

Det officielle navn er "Ormerende" ifølge SDFE.

Hvad er din kilde?
MicDK (2022-10-09 07:35:02+00:00): Hej,

Bækken hedder "Ormerenden" både lokalt, kommunalt og ministerielt. 

Der er over årene måske sket en glidning af navnet fra ubestemt til bestemt form. Noget SDFE ikke er opdateret på. 

Det  er måske en lokal sydfynsk/tøsingsk måde, at betegne vandløb på. Vi har også Hovedrenden, Lungerenden, Mejerirenden, Bjernemarksgrøften, Skellet, Sogneskellet m.m. Alle sammen vandløb i bestemt form.

Jeg tilføjer gerne "Ormerende" som alternativt navn.

Se f.eks. her:
Svendborg Kommune: 
https://www.svendborg.dk/sites/default/files/acadre/Files_3873_4546991/ormerenden.pdf.pdf

Miljøministeriet:
https://kyst.dk/offentliggoerelser/strand/2019/august/dispensation-til-omlaegning-af-vandloeb-mv-paa-valdemars-slot-taasinge/

Trap Danmark:
https://trap.lex.dk/Kanal,_mv.,_Ormerenden

Med venlig hilsen
Michael
osmviborg (2022-10-09 18:41:13+00:00): "SDFI vedligeholder registret Danske Stednavne, som er det officielle register for stednavne i Danmark". Dine kilder må have glemt at indberette det ændrede navn. https://indberetning.sdfe.dk/stednavn/
osmviborg (2022-10-09 18:44:16+00:00): Det må være "Ormerenden" der er det lokale/alternative navn, indtil videre.
b-holdet (2022-10-10 04:10:02+00:00): Ser du på det officielle kort fra Geodanmark Natur og Friluft, som også vises i dine kilder, så er navnet stadig "Ormerende". 
At man benytter det i bestemt ental er en talemåde, men som udgangspunkt er navnet ikke i bestemt ental. Du skal altså et skridt længere bag dine kilde, for at finde deres kilder

  https://sdfekort.dk/spatialmap?mapheight=807&mapwidth=1635&label=&ignorefavorite=true&profile=sdfekort&selectorgroups=gst-grundkort+gd-baggrundskort+dhym&layers=theme-gst-natur_friluftskort+userline&opacities=1+1&mapext=604068.1038976961+6097082.756511994+604755.8098868662+6097421.124734886&maprotation=
MicDK (2022-10-13 20:37:45+00:00): Danske Stednavne har nu ændret Ormerende til Ormerenden.

---
Hej Michael

Jeg sender dig lige den besked, som nu ligger på din indberetning (i tilfælde af at du ikke logger på igen og læser den):

Ormerende er nu registreret i bestemt form. Desuden er, med baggrund i regulativer, Hovedrenden og Bjernemarksgrøften registreret. Mejerirenden er alias til Lille Bæk - også registreret nu. Skellet er i forvejen registreret. Der er ikke fundet brugbare oplysninger på Lungerenden og Sogneskellet.

Med venlig hilsen

Anette Klinker
osmviborg (2022-10-14 04:12:39+00:00): ✌.|•͡˘‿•͡˘|.✌
ezekielf (2022-10-06 20:10:02+00:00): Hi, you replaced a school node with an area here, but you only preserved the amenity, and name tags, deleting the rest.  Please do not do this.  There was useful information in those tags, especially the address information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127061565
Carto'Cité (2023-08-28 12:54:21+00:00): Bonjour,
Je me suis permis de corriger la piste pour la passer en voie verte. N’hésite pas si tu as la moindre question.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
doum50 (2023-08-28 18:32:48+00:00): bonjour
ok pas de soucis.
Cordialement
mavl (2022-10-06 16:15:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, зачем вы в России переименовали реку Ишим в Есіл?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 23:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127176855 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some satirical vandalism of Kaliningrad
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 23:39:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127176855 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some satirical vandalism of Kaliningrad
NieWnen (2022-10-09 14:08:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101311931

O co chodzi z tym fragmentem? 

Jeśli pozwala on na włączenie się z ulicy lub wjazd w nią, to powinien zostać połączony z jezdnią, jeśli nie to w takim przypadku warto dodać na końcu noexit=yes, bo ktoś omyłkowo może połączyć, bo podejrzanie wygląda.
W3NET0wns (2022-10-10 12:52:07+00:00): Jest to najprawdopodobniej wjazd i wyjazd z drogi rowerowej od razu na jezdnię
Dodko (2023-02-06 11:35:27+00:00): Adresy pre novostavby nájdete tu.
https://proxy.freemap.sk/minvskaddress/
Treba si prečítať návod citaj_ma.html a môžete pravidelne pridávať okres Senec.
RicoElectrico (2022-12-14 19:41:15+00:00): Cześć!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098076822/history

amenity=marketplace wydaje mi się na wyrost. To chyba tylko 2 sklepy są.
czebureks (2022-12-16 13:15:55+00:00): Cześć! Faktycznie, są to tylko dwa sklepy, ale chodziło mi w tym tagu o oddanie specyficznego "rynkowego" minikrajobrazu kulturowego tego miejsca, którego nie oddaje samo landuse=retail. Sklepy te regularnie zajmują około połowę przejścia skrzynkami z owocami i warzywami. Z tego względu byłbym za utrzymaniem tego tagu. Chyba że przyjmujemy normę, że taki ryneczek musi zajmować jakąś minimalną powierzchnię.
fx99 (2022-10-08 17:16:27+00:00): admin_level=2 is reserved for the whole country, not the capitol, see e.g. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/71525 Paris
Please fix it.
mboeringa (2022-10-08 18:14:55+00:00): Thanks for pointing out. This was an accidental error, I had intended to edit the node of Lomé, not the boundary relation. 

This is now fixed.