piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-06-04 17:07:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
evod (2019-06-09 20:45:02+00:00): DIe Haller Straße (B171) wurde von primary auf trunk hochgestuft - handelt es sich hier wirklich um eine Schnellstraße (oder zumindest Autostraße)?

"Normale" hochrangige Straßen die weder Autobahn, Schnellstraße und Autostraße sind werden in Österreich üblicherweise primary (und niedriger) gemappt. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway
luschi (2019-07-14 20:42:58+00:00): alle revertiert, da wohl keine Erklärung/Antwort von Hibenny zu erwarten ist.       
Diskussion diesbezüglich konnte ich auch keine finden.     
Weiteres siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72233572
user_5359 (2019-06-08 16:33:47+00:00): Hello! Could you check the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5244982781, please? I assumed that the tag "Dokkhin Khan"="Ashkona" is an error.
Zabir91 (2019-08-01 18:08:34+00:00): yes, it was an error, thank you for pointing out. It is corrected about 2 months ago by mueschel in
Changeset #71109646
gileri (2019-07-14 16:32:33+00:00): Bonjour,

Je connais pas très bien les tags pour les frontières, mais il me semble que les morceaux de frontière doivent avoir le admin_level=* de la frontière la plus importante dont ils font partie.

Exemple :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568700019 est en admin_level=6 alors qu'il appartient à cette frontière admin_level=8 :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/39072

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
Olyon (2019-07-16 07:33:12+00:00): Bonjour
Cest l'inverse. Il faut sur le way mettre l admin_level avec la valeur la plus faible.
Admin_level=8 cest une commune
7 une sous-préfecture
6 un département 
4 une région
2 un pays
Donc si un way est une frontière de commune et de département,  il faut indiquer que cest une frontière de département avec admin_level=6
gileri (2019-07-16 20:13:11+00:00): Ah oui j'avais compris à l'envers, merci pour l'explication !
jpennycook (2019-06-05 09:43:57+00:00): Hello.

You've marked at least one section where cyclists must dismount as bicycle=yes by deleting the crossings - e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420593586/history
It's important for journey planners to take into account the delay imposed by cyclists having to dismount - can you add the bicycle=dismount/highway=footway sections back in please?

Jon
jpennycook (2019-06-05 09:47:36+00:00): Hello again.

You removed the "ref" from the roundabout on The Glanty, when the roads on either side have the same "ref".  Was there a reason for this?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566757772/history

Jon
Nathan_A_RF (2019-06-05 11:46:49+00:00): Hi. About the cycleway, you're right. I forgot to add these dismount tags back when removing the crossing line before. I'll add those back. As for the roundabout, they don't really carry road numbers as all roads from it have equal priority, and no road number is on top. The Glanty is different however, as it's not a roundabout anymore, so it carries the A30 number.
jpennycook (2019-06-05 12:02:32+00:00): Thanks!

Jon
mueschel (2019-06-06 08:54:47+00:00): Hi,
please check this way and its tags

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694545805

Jan
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-06-08 15:57:24+00:00): reverted
santamariense (2019-06-04 19:40:56+00:00): Olá. Estive revisando sua edição. Parece estar tudo OK. Qualquer dúvida que tiver não exite em perguntar.
Participe do grupo OSM RS no Telegram: https://t.me/osmrs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70931950
Mammi71 (2020-10-20 20:13:41+00:00): Hallo Oskar-55,
warum trägst Du den Wohnmobilstellplatz doppelt ein, als Fläche und als Poi?
Oskar-55 (2020-10-21 17:55:26+00:00): Habe Poi entfernt, Danke für den Hinweis
Mammi71 (2020-10-21 21:06:21+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reaktion. Du hast hoffentlich vorher geprüft, ob am Poi nicht Informationen waren, die an der Fläche noch fehlten?
Bei der Gelegenheit: 
wenn internet_access=no, warum dann internet_access:fee=no? Was wolltest Du damit zum Ausdruck bringen? Das man für etwas, was nicht vorhanden ist, nicht auch noch etwas zahlen muss, sollte ja wohl implizit sein, oder?
Mammi71 (2020-10-21 21:16:54+00:00): PS: Ich nehme an, Du kommst nicht aus der Gegend. Gehst Du trotzdem mit mir einig, dass der Weg vor dem Stellplatz einschließlich access-Werte angepasst werden muss? Sonst kann da nur der Bauer mit seinem Womo hinfahren ;-)
Ich werde das in kürze überprüfen und korrigieren.
Jmarzou (2019-06-04 18:04:18+00:00): Rectification : l'inauguration a eu lieu le  29 mai 2016 (source : bulletin municipal http://www.mairie-larocheblanche.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/BM-2016.pdf)
Tomas Straupis (2019-06-04 18:18:48+00:00): Hello. What route is it? What did you want to tag? Do you need help?
mavl (2019-06-05 16:01:49+00:00): Hello Apolo2019.  
You use the identical changeset comments (Ponto de Ônibus). Please, use good changeset comments:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
M_Gaugg (2019-06-05 06:34:09+00:00): Bitte aufpassen, du hast den Strassen Typ fälschlicherweise von Bundesstraße auf Schnellstraße abgeändert, was so nicht stimmt.
M_Gaugg (2019-06-05 07:06:49+00:00): ich habe es mittlerweile korrigiert.
Recoil16 (2019-06-05 08:12:25+00:00): Hallo Lana!
Schön, dass Du bei OpenStreetMap mitmachst. Hat sich denn nur die Hausnummer des Gebäudes geändert (das fände ich ziemlich spannend) oder ist der Laden tatsächlich nun woanders? Die Node ist nämlich auf dem Bürgersteig vor Gebäude 17. 
LG Recoil
parukhin (2019-06-23 09:45:32+00:00): Елена, здравствуйте.
Подскажите, пожалуйста, источник адресной информации, которую вы вносите.
Сенько Елена (2019-06-24 05:10:48+00:00): Добрый день!
в основном информацию беру из гугл и яндекс карт.
mavl (2019-12-08 05:57:20+00:00): Здравствуйте, Сенько Елена. В OpenStreetMap нельзя добавлять данные из каких-либо источников без явного разрешения правообладателя. Немного об этом можно почитать в статье:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:FAQ
mavl (2019-12-08 11:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78101903, 78106642, 78104078 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70933401].
viloan (2019-06-04 18:29:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
korolenok (2019-06-10 09:51:23+00:00): Markpp, hi! I know that is really important for you to mark it as park. But this tag used for more obvious park-like parts. I will make separate territories for the park and the university, if you agree with me and will not correct me. In this way we can come to some kind of compromise.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70933856
markpp (2019-06-10 12:07:19+00:00): Korolenok, hi! Could you explain why exactly the area can not be classified as a park, even though?
https://jornal.usp.br/universidade/usp-em-piracicaba-o-campus-que-tambem-e-parque/
korolenok (2019-06-11 14:07:33+00:00): We have this info in Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark) 
A park is an area of open space for recreational use, usually designed and in semi-natural state with grassy areas, trees and bushes. Parks are usually urban, but not always; there are some rural parks[1]. Parks are smaller than their hosting city or town, being fully contained within them. Even though parks are typically open to the public, they can be fenced off, temporarily closed (like at night time) or open only to certain people (e.g. homeowners, residents).

But in our case we have large buildings relatively close to each other. So in my opinion we need to draw parts that are identifiable as "parks" (the ones with trees, grassy and water) and need to draw parts that are identifiable as areas of "university".
markpp (2019-06-11 14:16:34+00:00): The area is according to the description of the info in wiki
Gabriele Dri (2019-07-13 22:11:55+00:00): Modifica molto discutibile:

5 mesi fa Damjan l'ha corretta in buona fede da Via Don Bosco a via mons.Biasutti credendo che la laterale di via Zoffo proseguisse fino alla ferrovia. Insospettito da questo cambio ho aperto una nota per avere più info in merito, anche perchè lo stradario del comune di Udine, aggiornato al 31/12/2018 e open source, pur contenendo degli errori in altre aree era molto chiaro su via Don Bosco e non c'erano contraddizioni.

Il 16/5 ho effettuato un sopralluogo sul posto e non ho notato alcuna variazione rispetto alla situazione precedente, né nessun nuovo cartello. Dunque ho ripristinato la toponomastica precedente e aggiunto qualche dettaglio della zona.

Lo scorso mese hai stravolto la situazione, introducendo una serie di modifiche, di cui molte anche fuori dalle norme di OSM. Anche se hai fatto un sopralluogo in seguito, in ogni caso hai cancellato l'unica e continua (idealmente) via Don Bosco e hai creato nell'ordine:

1) una strada senza nome
2) Via Mons. Guglielmo Biasutti (già via don Giovanni Bosco) [nome non formattato correttamente, così come già fatto da te a Palmanova in una nota ancora aperta]
3) Via don Bosco (te lo sei dimenticato di correggere evidentemente)
4) Via Mons. Guglielmo Biasutti (già via don Giovanni Bosco) [di nuovo]
5) Via don Giovanni Bosco [oltre la ferrovia, così come indica l'import dei numeri civici, ma i cartelli sul posto e lo stradario dicono che il nome ufficiale è solo Via don Bosco]

Tutta questo mix è contro quanto visto da me sul posto, contro la situazione precedente alla costruzione della ferrovia (quando via Don Bosco era una sola, da via Planis a via Liguria) e mai modificata nello stradario ufficiale e soprattutto contro ogni logica e regola di OSM
Gabriele Dri (2019-07-13 22:15:05+00:00): Ah, alla lista aggiungo anche:

6) Via Don Bosco (non modificata rispetto all'originale)
7) Via don Giovanni Bosco (interni) (altra formattazione molto discutibile)

Visto la confusione creatasi per nulla, se non hai le prove delle tue modifiche random, attendo ancora un po', poi ritorno alle denominazioni originarie.
kapazao (2019-06-05 11:28:20+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías explicar por qué has eliminado la tienda y techo para ponerlo todo como un edificio?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70934933
Xeriz (2019-06-05 14:01:33+00:00): Basicamente el techo es lo que protege los surtidores de la gasolinera de la intemperie y la tienda es la tienda de la gasolinera o sea todo pertenece al mismo negocio.
Si consideras que es más correcto lo otro lo vuelvo a dejar como estaba
kapazao (2019-06-06 10:37:42+00:00): El hecho de que todo pertenezca al mismo negocio no hace que perdamos detalle de los datos. Se le puede añadir un operador o ponerlo todo dentro del área de la gasolinera y con eso es suficiente.

Aquí tienes una guía: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dfuel

Y te dejo un par de ejemplos de gasolineras o estaciones de servicio:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/37.25811/-3.76627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/37.22641/-3.66844

Trataré de revertir los cambios esta tarde, no hay problema, pero ten en cuenta esto.

Un saludo
Rom1 (2019-06-12 11:12:02+00:00): Salut, tu iras faire un tour pour repérer la plaque cf. https://www.estrepublicain.fr/edition-de-nancy-agglomeration/2019/06/12/francois-hollande-inaugure-la-rue-jean-zay ? A+
Axelos (2019-06-12 19:20:10+00:00): Non car je monte rarement la côte de Brabois.
dgitto (2019-12-11 08:20:38+00:00): Ciao, qual è il vero nome di via della distilleria / via del diritto alla nutrizione ? perché così come è adesso il tag name non coincide col tag addr:street dei civici.
presumo uno sia il nuovo nome e l'altro il vecchio nome. Se è così bisognetrebbe usare il tag old_name e lasciare ovviamente solo il nuovo nome
dgitto (2019-12-11 08:21:07+00:00): vale anche per le altre vie in questo stato
Sosha1996 (2019-06-27 13:33:09+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «farahan» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Sowa1980 (2019-09-25 13:40:00+00:00): Привет, поясни свои действия по чему были удалены мультиполигоны и отношения и другие объекты. На лицо массовое удаление, объектов , жалоба на тебя в DWG обеспечена за ванлаизм, на замечание других участников ты не реагируешь. Пусть с тобой разбирается DWG буду настаивать на твоей блокировке в проекте окончательно и бесповоротно.
Sowa1980 (2019-09-25 14:05:14+00:00): Буду настаивать на откате этой правке и всех правок по тамбовской области за Вандализм, надоело перерисовывать. Уже за Вандалами.
sebastic (2019-09-26 19:13:37+00:00): Just make sure not to (re-)introduce broken polygons, then they won't show up in the QA dataset, and other mappers won't be inclined to fix them upsetting you again.

If you want details of my changes, inspect the history of the objects in question.
Protoxenus (2026-02-26 09:53:05+00:00): Du hast hier ein paar Wege ohne Anbindung in die Landschaft gezaubert. Existieren die so einfach losgelöst?
Gruß Protoxenus
limes11 (2024-01-16 21:54:07+00:00): Hi, 

du hast hier vor vier Jahren die Eigenschaften einer Brücke verändert. Das hat aber nicht so ganz geklappt. Wolltest du ausdrücken, dass die Brücke wieder begehbar ist ? 

Viele Grüße
grimaldi (2024-01-17 16:14:13+00:00): Das ist jetzt schon ein bisschen lang her, ich glaube damals war die Brücke nach dem(?)/einem Hochwasser gesperrt. Wie es heute dort ausschaut: k.A.
mueschel (2019-06-10 16:23:39+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
You added the tag "payment:gratis = yes" here - what does that mean? This tag is not used in any other place.

Jan
Genzo W (2019-06-26 20:10:12+00:00): refers to that instead there is FREE ENTRY WITHOUT ANY COST
mueschel (2019-06-26 21:07:48+00:00): Hi,
the correct tag would be "fee=no".

But isn't entry to a shop like a kiosk free everywhere?
jpennycook (2019-06-05 09:55:37+00:00): Hello.
You've marked the bridge on Sulhamstead Road as a ford (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6521978493) - can you confirm there really is a ford there?  If not, waterways should not normally be joined to roads.  If there is a ford, can you confirm if there is a footbridge for pedestrians to get over?

Jon
jpennycook (2019-06-05 10:00:43+00:00): Hello again.

I don't remember there being a ford on Theale Road in the middle of houses (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6521978494#map=16/51.4140/-1.0571&layers=C).  Can you confirm that there is a ford there - i.e. a place where the water runs above the road surface and people would have to cycle or drive through the water rather than the water being below? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dyes)

Jon
bringbring (2019-06-05 16:13:23+00:00): Hiya, sorry added fords instead of a point last night by accident - just deleted them now. I'm pretty sure the water is below the road.
jpennycook (2019-06-05 16:42:33+00:00): Thanks - that's great.
Tomas Straupis (2019-06-05 04:49:42+00:00): Isn't this a duplicate part of this larger route relation?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6519670
Peter Elderson (2019-06-05 05:25:05+00:00): That larger relation is not a real route - no markings, no operator. One of my contacts says it's a proposal which never came real. It has state=proposal, they don't want it removed, but they don't want it active either! Another hiker has seen markings for a small part of a real E11 in Lithuania and wants that to show on waymarkedtrails. We decided to start a new and real E11 Lithuania reation and leave the "fake" one as it is.
Tomas Straupis (2019-06-05 05:26:41+00:00): Ok, clear. Thank you for the explanation. Give me a note if you need some help.
Peter Elderson (2019-06-05 05:47:05+00:00): I will. I'm trying to determine if the markings they have seen are in fact markings of an organisation or club for a longer route, because they might be just local routes. As far as I know there is no hiking operator in Lithuania.
Tomas Straupis (2019-06-05 05:55:19+00:00): Local hiking routes are tagged with network=lwn. Local routes also have a corresponding node tagged with tourism=attraction+attraction:type=hiking_route. As far as I know there is no local hiking route in this place.
Peter Elderson (2019-06-05 06:13:35+00:00): Are you from Lithuania? I would like to have a contact there, because a Dutch hiking group is hiking the E11 trail and is exploring to extend it through Lithuania (and eventually to Moscow). I have posted on the OSM forum in users:lithuania ( https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=751585#p751585 ) maybe we could discuss things there?
Tomas Straupis (2019-06-05 06:46:40+00:00): Yes, I am from Lithuania. We mostly communicate in mailing list (talk-lt) and pubs. I will ask in maillist about organisation for longer routes and will then post an answer to the OSM forum.
Peter Elderson (2019-06-05 07:39:06+00:00): Thanks! CU there.
mariotomo (2020-10-28 17:09:27+00:00): hola 'Servicios Técnicos', pusieron un edificio con nombre "Pensión".  será que se trate de un hotel?  voy a borrar el nombre, y espero se encarguen ustedes u otros, en mejorar la representación.
Way: Pensión (694574389)
Essin (2019-06-07 21:17:46+00:00): Den här redigeringen gjorde kartan avgjort sämre, åtminstone i Mårdsundsbodarna https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2260506817 som jag råkar ha lokalkännedom om. Det är egentligen ett fritidshusområde (landuse=residential insprängt i natural=wood) men just nu påstår OSM att stora delar av området används för skogsbruk, med skogsbryn utsatta på mer eller mindre slumpmässiga ställen. Nationella marktäckedata-datasetet kanske är användbart för att ta reda på hur stor andel av marken är skogstäckt inom ett område, men för OSM-ändamål verkar det tyvärr inte ha tillräcklig precision i den upplösning det utger sig för att ha.
AndersAndersson (2019-10-16 12:53:50+00:00): Den mesta skogen i Sverige används för skogsbruk. Även skog nära hus.

Jag har ingen koll på just detta område, men skulle bli förvånad om ingen i sinom tid hugger ner träden och säljer dom eller eldar upp dom.
pangoSE (2019-11-08 16:37:42+00:00): Jag håller med Essin. Otroligt fula kantiga områden blev det. Vissa överlappar varann och det är en värre oordning.
Om jag skulle mappa det här skulle jag göra en stor skogsMP och lägga in området runt husen som inner. 
Allt som är taggat grassland är skog som är huggen ner. Ingen gräs öht.
marc__marc (2019-06-13 22:18:29+00:00): Bonjour,
ce changeset n'a pas de sens, il déplace tous les nœuds de 2 bâtiments  sur 3km tout en conservant 2 nœuds communs avec un bâtiment resté à l'emplacement d'origine.
je l'ai par conséquent annulé.
cordialement,
Marc
baptistemm (2019-06-14 05:54:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Houla, bien vu. J'ai du faire une mauvaise manipulation. Existe-il un plugin ou une fonctionnalité qui me permettrait de voir ce genre de modifications un peu bizarre au moment des les uploader.

Merci.
marc__marc (2019-06-14 09:00:22+00:00): Bonjour,
avant envoi (et même idéalement avant modif), le chargement de la zone dans josm aurait permit au validateur de détecter la superposition des bâtiments
le lendemain de l'envoi, osmose le détecte aussi
Cordialement,
Marc
Gabriele Dri (2019-09-20 22:43:22+00:00): Ciao. Sapresti dirmi per favore la fonte di questa intitolazione? Grazie
TravGW (2019-06-04 21:41:13+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Unfortunately the features you added were duplicates of features already on the map and this changeset has been reverted. If you are trying to edit or correct a feature’s information you need only click on the feature and the editor will let you edit it. If you need more help you can consult the wiki @ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
Zabir91 (2019-06-06 17:04:55+00:00): welcome to open street map. 
You did very well. 😊 Thanks. Pleases keep enriching OSM by adding and updating it more.
one thing to remember, while adding name, 
(Please do not add English name in the name=* field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla> 
name:bn=<Bangla> 
name:en=<English> 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh

অনুগ্রহ করে প্রাথমিক নাম ( name = ) বাংলায় লিখুন। যদি অন্য ভাষায় নাম দিতে চান তবে তা সেই ভাষার স্ব কোডে দিন (যেমন name:en = )
আইডি এডিটরে নামের পাশে + চেপে অন্য ভাষার নাম যোগ করতে পারেন
ধন্যবাদ।
BAK365 (2019-06-05 10:13:47+00:00): Hallo dikkeknodel,
im Kanton Glarus stehen Daten der amtlichen Vermessung jetzt als Open Data zur Verfügung. Vielleicht interessiert dich das, auch Wanderwege sind dabei, im Geoportal  https://data.geo.gl.ch/client5/index.html?user=opendownload&password=none unter "Langsamverkehr".

Grüsse, und viel Spass auf deinen Touren!
BAK365