piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marc__marc (2024-09-23 14:55:30+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Louis,

Que veux dire description=1967-2014 ?

Et est-ce vraiment interessant de dire qu'une voie sans parking a une bande de parking de type "pas de bande" ?
on pourrait aussi décrire que la surface du parking est "pas de bande" et dupliquer à l'infini les tags décrivant toutes les non-caractéristique de l'absence du parking.
Surtout que "rond-point" n'est pas la bonne raison puisqu'il y a des ronds-points avec parking. la raison est plutôt : largeur insuffisante ou priorité au nombre de bande roulante ou volonté politique, plein de chose totalement subjective qui ne sont pas une bonne chose pour osm.
qu'en penses-tu ?
Cordialement,
Marc
JLZIMMERMANN (2024-09-24 13:32:25+00:00): Bonjour Marc,
- la description '1967-2014' correspond à la période de présence du 1er REC
- pour ce qui est des attributs liés au stationnement le long des voies c'est l'outil PLanes qui pousse ceux-ci comme avec ce type https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes/#18/44.13677/4.80852
KKS (2015-11-05 18:10:31+00:00): Hello, how it on Ukraine side both railway gauge 1520 and 1435 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343966246 way. It is possible?
user_717069 (2015-11-06 10:51:40+00:00): It is marked as interlaced track and looks like this http://www.budowaroku.pl/images/2011/2011_50_Image_0004.jpg
though I doubt if interlaced section streaches so far into Ukraine, probably only to Мостиська.
KKS (2015-11-06 11:42:46+00:00): OK thanks, I thouth it was a mistake. But on picture I see - It could be real.
Jojo4u (2015-05-29 10:49:10+00:00): Hallo Uhkabu,

ein amenity=disused ist kaum gebräuchlich (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=amenity%3Ddisused). Besser ist es disused:amenity= und disused:name= zu verwenden. Die restlichen Tags sollte man entfernen.

LG Joachim
Hjart (2015-05-26 11:28:11+00:00): Making smaller (as in area) changesets makes it easier for the rest of us to check changes of interest to us.
DaveF (2015-05-26 21:31:28+00:00): Hi again
Could you ensure paths (& all ways) join up to each other otherwise routing won't work.
Dr Kludge (2015-05-31 00:44:47+00:00): Kisaa I just do not understand what you are reverting or correcting!  cuisine = coffee_shop.  Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cuisine%3Dcoffee_shop .  Now you have changed the value to "Coffee"  That value is not correct.   Please review the wiki page.  I believe you are missing something here.
kisaa (2015-05-31 03:14:35+00:00): Week ago, I tried to change all cuisine=coffee* tags to cuisine=coffee_shop.
There were several similar changesets, which caused controversial reaction of OSM society: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31388665
After I made changes, DWG recommended to not change "coffee" to "coffee_shop" because "it _might_ be a restaurant in which all the dishes contain coffee" and so on. That is why I reverted all similar changesets, including this one.
CAI Stabia (2015-05-26 12:14:10+00:00): Buongiorno Giorgio, posso chiederti come mai hai modificato il tag del sentiero 350a? L'attributo footway è indicato per percorsi pedonali prevalentemente urbani mentre i path si associano più propriamente ai sentieri. Se hai dubbi non esitare a chiederceli. Siamo qui anche per questo. Ciao
Giorgio84 (2015-05-26 13:29:20+00:00): Mi dispiace, ho letto male la mappa e avevo cambiato in carrabile. Poi, non appena mi sono accorto dell'errore ho provveduto a rimetterla pedonale, ma si vede che OSM non me l'ha salvato. Provvedo a correggere l'errore immediatamente.
CAI Stabia (2015-05-26 20:08:26+00:00): Nessun problema, scambiammoci idee e commenti se necessario.
Ciao
mgpx (2015-05-27 22:06:50+00:00): Szia,
ez a körút felrajzolás így nagyon beteg.
Az átfedő útszakaszokat (pl főúttal átfedő gyalogút) meg kellene szüntetni, a címkézéseket rendbe kellene tenni (pl ford=yes gázlót jelöl - annak itt mi értelme?). Ha turistajelzést vagy jelölt gyalogutat akarsz ábrázolni, akkor azt relációval (kapcsolattal) lehet megtenni, nem így.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
corfede (2015-05-26 22:07:13+00:00): Il leisure=park inserito si trova per buona parte sul mare e si sovrappone a landuse residenziali. Il website associato riporta un dominio in vendita. Come da titolo del changeset si tratta molto probabilmente di una prova da eliminare.
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-05-27 02:19:06+00:00): Зачем рисовать заново все здания, когда они уже были отрисованы и подписаны?
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-05-27 17:43:33+00:00): Удалил дубли.
mgpx (2015-05-27 21:48:19+00:00): Szia,
a "bridge=Gyaloghíd" nem szabályos jelölés, a bridge címke csak kötött értékeket vehet fel. Ha csak gyalogosan járható hidat akarsz ábrázolni, azt a "highway=path" plusz "bridge=yes" címkézéssel tudod megtenni.
kaitu (2017-09-04 08:21:05+00:00): Ciao,
sono passato lo scorso agosto dal Passo di Sodadura, ma non ho visto la statua della Madonna della neve. Non ho cercato accuratamente, se piccola potrebbe essermi sfuggita, ma anche in foto che ho scattato non si vedono statue.  

Ho trovato invece una statua della Madonna con il bambino sulla vetta del Monte Sodadura, che non era mappata (ho provveduto a farlo).

Mi chiedo se la madonna che hai inserito al passo Sodadura potesse essere quella che ora è sulla cima?
Maxxer (2017-09-04 08:32:01+00:00): Probabilmente ho sbabgliato il posizionamento, era quella della vetta. Provvedi tu a cancellarla? grazie
kaitu (2017-09-04 10:32:57+00:00): Grazie per la rapida risposta. Ho spostato la madonna sulla vetta.
AMDmi3 (2015-06-04 12:33:41+00:00): В name улицы не может быть никаких приписок. Если внутри одного НП есть несколько улиц с одним названием, используется addr:suburb (и на улице, и на адресах). Т.е.

name=Цветочная улица
addr:suburb=Проскотино

addr:housenumber=1
addr:street=Цветочная улица
addr:suburb=Проскотино
SomeoneElse (2015-05-26 18:33:02+00:00): OK, so if I want to park my bike at Tesco's in Southampton I now need to bring an American Express card :)

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2211564469

A couple of other questions come to mind also - (a) have you surveyed all of these or are you assuming that "because it's a Tesco it'll take Amex" and (b) is it appropriate to even store individual common payment types?  

Mechanical edits such as this should get discussed first - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for the reasoning.  In the case of (a) as you found out it's simply not safe to assume that "if most things labelled as shop A do X then all do".  In the case of (b) there are arguments on both sides - there's absolutely no point in tagging that my local corner shop takes cash but you might consider it noteworthy that (say) the Devonshire Arms in Cambridge takes bitcoin - and the place to discuss where on that line Tesco's taking Amex is is I would suggest the talk-gb mailing list.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-26 19:27:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31484245 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed mechanical edit
Tom Morris (2015-05-27 09:41:42+00:00): 1. Yes, fair cop on the bike_parking. I really ought to have checked to make sure all the Tesco Express objects were tagged as shops (etc.) and thrown out any car or bike parks.

2. I do think that it is broadly useful in the case of American Express. Visa and Mastercard are pretty much accepted everywhere, but Amex is taken in some places but not others. I'm in the middle of building an Overpass-driven app that shows you where places are that take Amex, similar to Coinmap. I don't think we need every shop to be tagged payment:visa=yes. payment:bitcoin is useful because most places don't take BitCoin. and payment:american_express is useful because though a lot more places take Amex than take Bitcoin, it's sort of half way between "almost nowhere" (like Bitcoin) and "almost everywhere" (like Visa/MC).

That's why I've been collecting the data - a lot of my edits are adding it for small shops and businesses in London as I'm surveying.

As for Tesco, it's known that every Tesco and Sainsbury's in the UK take Amex - it's a fact that Amex note on their UK website.

3. The automated edits process is needlessly tiresome and bureaucratic, as with a lot of things on OSM. It basically amounts to a long-winded chinwag which eventually ends with people saying no. That's not fun at all and no way to get anyone to do anything. The very best way to improve the OSM community would be to abolish all mailing lists immediately.

But I guess I'll reluctantly do it...
SomeoneElse (2015-05-27 10:01:44+00:00): It could be argued that the automated edits process is "needfFULLY tiresome and bureaucratic" because people add payment types to car parks, disused cafes and bus stops otherwise :)

Whether a statement on Tesco's website can be taken as gospel is an interesting question (someone on IRC last night reckoned that they've struggled to use Amex in some Tescos).  I can certainly imagine other examples of "head office says X, local shop manager does Y.

I'd also completely agree that OSM mailing lists are the worst form of communication within OSM - except of course for all the others!  

It wasn't an entirely wasteful process though - some duplicate nodes in Tunbridge Wells got fixes as a result of it: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31489680
CjMalone (2020-06-27 20:41:35+00:00): @SomeoneElse What's the correct way to map bicycle_parking? Presumably the one you linked should be operator=Tesco Express not name=Tesco Express
SomeoneElse (2020-06-27 21:22:12+00:00): @CjMalone - yes, that would make sense to me.  The name wasn't added in this changeset though - you can see it in http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=2211564469 .
PT-53 (2019-08-05 07:35:11+00:00): Hallo Seetroll,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38842922/history
highway=track in highway=construction + construction=track geändert.
In diesem Änderungssatz
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48847438#map=18/47.76477/9.09287 wurde von Mapper Chaedouin highway=construction wieder in highway=track zurück geändert, das Merkmal construction=track aber nicht gelöscht, weshalb im OSM-Inspector ein Hinweis "nonop_confusion_on_ways" angezeigt wird:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.09302&lat=47.76549&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways
Wie ist denn der aktuelle Stand? Ist der Weg wieder offen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-05 07:37:15+00:00): Schau Dir bitte auch noch den anderen OSMI-Hinweis an.
Seetroll (2019-08-12 09:12:10+00:00): Hallo PT-53. Ich war gestern vor Ort und die Marienschlucht ist nach wie vor gesperrt. DIes wird duch mehrere Hinweisschilder signalisiert. Auch den Parkplatz am Kargegg oberhalb des Weges gibt es zwischenzeitich nicht mehr, deswegen ich ihn im OSM bereits entfernt habe. Durch Sperrgitter bzw. Schranken ist der Weg zu Marienschlucht nach wie vor gesperrt.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-12 09:55:54+00:00): Hallo Seetroll,
Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Der Weg ist ja in OSM weiterhin mit access=no gesperrt. Dann könnte man ja construction=track auf jeden Fall löschen.
Übernimmst Du das?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-12 09:58:19+00:00): PS:
access=no + foot=yes besagt, daß der Weg doch für Fußgänger frei ist.
Wenn der Weg aber weiterhin gesperrt ist, müßte foot=yes weg.
Grüße
Nakaner (2015-05-28 21:10:54+00:00): Ich habe gedacht, Level0 würde man für Mechanisches verwenden. Bist du wirklich so ein Freak, dass du keine vollwertige GUI mehr brauchst? :-)

Ich habe diesen Changset zufällig gefunden, weil ich in diesem Gebiet gerade eine Bbox bei WhoDidIt aufgezogen hatte (Ursache war die Suche nach einer Import-Bot-Armee).
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:16:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
Yorvik Prestigitator (2015-05-26 22:54:54+00:00): Why have you deleted the clock above the Yeoman store in Blake Street? The clock is still there (and telling the correct time)
Piccadilly does not cross Fishergate
yorkydude (2015-05-27 07:56:40+00:00): Oh, sorry I must have done that by mistake. I moved a building area by accident and put it back, but i thought that was the only mistake I made
trigpoint (2015-05-26 21:39:33+00:00): What is this? I don't think sculptures would be allowed in Bradgate Park.
GerdP (2015-10-15 15:44:06+00:00): please review: invalid tags for 
way 32269418:
highway=residential;tertiary
surface=paved;unpaved
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
Durko_freemap (2015-05-27 11:11:07+00:00): Zdravim evan, tu cycleway treba napojit na cestu 537001 (teraz je napojena na ciaru co oznacuje hranicu lesa). Ak treba poradiť, stačí sa opýtať na https://groups.google.com/group/osm_sk.
evan70 (2015-05-27 11:17:31+00:00): Oki, vdaka, opravujem :)
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:15:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:14:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:15:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
Jose Riha (2015-06-05 15:38:27+00:00): o co v tejto zmene slo? vidim tam jeden obrovsky obldznik bez tagov. jedna sa o (mozno neumyselny) vandalizmus?
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:15:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-29 10:15:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31558616 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed mechanized addition of businesses by 'Synup' and more than hundred automatically created other accounts, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/645
GerdP (2015-10-15 14:43:11+00:00): please review:
way 43533380 now has invalid tags
highway=residential;track
surface=paved;ground;unpaved
Luuuddooo (2015-06-02 19:54:02+00:00): Je croyais que depuis que la gendarmerie était rue de la Pichonnière
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1251330459) ce bâtiment n’accueillait plus le public. Si c'est bien le cas je pense que amenity=police n'est pas approprié.
Hjart (2015-05-26 20:32:54+00:00): Hvad er forskellen på gaden Klostervænget og det her punkt?
AE35 (2015-05-27 05:59:18+00:00): En ansat på Assistens Kirkegård - sagde at nabolag Klostervænget ikke lå på kirkegården - men lå nede  Sydvest på - at der er en vej der hedder det samme er så lidt mystisk - anyway nabolag "Klostervænget" stammer fra Geodatastyrelsens og kan måske være fejl.
Hjart (2015-05-28 06:38:58+00:00): Man må vel spørge sig selv om der virkelig er behov for den her angivelse af nabolag=Klostervænget. For mig virker det noget overflødigt.
MicDK (2015-07-28 12:36:30+00:00): Jeg er den, som ud fra "Danmarks Stednavne" har placeret Klostervænget i hjørnet af Assistens Kirkegård. Det er sikkert den oprindelige placering. Der har i middelalderen ligget et kloster ved Klosterplads i Svendborg (for nogle år side udgravedes klosterets kirkegård under sporene ved Svendborg Banegård).

Klostervænget var så klosterets jordtilliggende mod syd og vest. Deraf placeringen i "Danmarks Stednavne".

Da det i nutiden dog skaber forvirring, fordi en vej bagefter har fået samme navn, forslår jeg (som Hjart) at stednavnet slettes. Det er på den måde blevet overflødigt, og nutidens svendborgensere vil ikke kunne skelne mellem det ene og det andet.
Hjart (2015-07-28 13:34:24+00:00): Hvis det er sådan det hænger sammen, giver det for mig ikke stor mening at beholde stednavnet. MicDK er velkommen til at slette det. 
Iøvrigt velkommen tilbage i det aktive selskab :-)
MicDK (2015-07-28 17:25:39+00:00): Tak, Hjart. Jeg er mere aktiv med "indendørsaktiviteter" som OSM i vinterhalvåret. Så jeg skal nok vende tilbage - p.t. dog ikke på fuld kraft.

Jeg fjerner hermed nabolaget "Klostervænget". 

:-) Michael
mavl (2015-05-26 18:17:35+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Позволю себе небольшое замечание.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218894792

Тюменская библейская семинария это не церковь (amenity=place_of_worship), а высшее учебное заведение (amenity=university):

http://yalutorovsk.bolshoiural.ru/company/tyumenskaya-bibleyskaya-seminariya-hristian-very-evangelskoy-yalutorovsk-otzyvy
Feuermond16 (2015-05-26 16:39:18+00:00): @Nakaner: Habe es dann doch selbst alleine vereinheitlicht
scai (2015-05-26 17:06:35+00:00): Huch, Copy'n'Paste-Fehler. Changeset sollte "Barbarossahöhle" heißen.
scai (2015-05-26 19:54:26+00:00): "Bohlen bei Saalfeld" ist sicher nicht der offizielle Name. Als Name sollten ausschließlich offizielle Namen eingetragen werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
scai (2015-05-26 19:54:52+00:00): Gleiches gilt für den Informationspunkt.
scai (2015-05-31 19:50:07+00:00): Habe die falschen Namen entfernt bzw. als description=* gesetzt.
naomap (2015-05-27 14:48:11+00:00): Bonjour.
Merci de votre participation au projet OSM.

Il semble toutefois que la modification 31480656 est erronée : vous avez apparemment créé 5 Mont-Blanc, chacun connecté à une relation différente. Cela a eu pour effet de "casser" la relation qui définit le périmètre de la France. Il faut savoir que l'éditeur en ligne iD n'est pas très adapté à la modification des relations ...

Quelle était votre intention ?

Cordialement,
Antoine.
naomap (2015-05-27 16:13:17+00:00): Après discussion sur la liste Talk-fr, j'ai préféré annuler votre groupe de modification (avec le plugin Revert pour JOSM). 
Merci de détailler l'objet de votre modification et nous verrons comment l'intégrer à OSM.
Merci,
Antoine.
BeKri (2017-09-15 11:21:42+00:00): Servus, ich schon wieder :-)))
Mit der 115-127 stimmt auch was nicht,
gibt es ja auch schob gegenüber und ungrade Nummern passen für die Hauptstraße auch nicht.
Kann es sein, daß das alles noch zur Obershagener Straße gehört ?
Und das die bis zum Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319726369 geht ?
Die Hauptstraße 86 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3547812122 geht ja auch bis dahin ...
Das müsstest Du aber vor Ort klären.
Gruss der BeKri
didimosi (2017-09-15 11:38:43+00:00): Hallo Bekri,
du hast Recht, diese beiden Stichstraßen gehören zur Obershagener Straße. Ich ändere das gleich
Gruß Dieter
Nakaner (2015-06-21 13:06:36+00:00): War das Absicht, dass du am Mühlener Tunnel, die Längenangabe "(309 m)" mit ins tunnel:name=* übernommen hast? Ich verwendet dafür lenght=*, denn "Name ist nur der Name." Ich habe es korrigiert.
Jojo4u (2015-06-21 13:09:20+00:00): Ich wollte mich nicht zu sehr einmischen, nur den Namen der Strecke mappen, die Tunnelnamen habe ich einfach korrigiert. Aber ich stimme dir überein.
Jojo4u (2015-06-21 22:08:49+00:00): " die Tunnelnamen habe ich einfach korrigiert." sollte "die Tunnelnamen habe ich einfach übernommen." heißen.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-26 22:23:02+00:00): Jaka korekta? Proszę dawać wyczerpujące opisy zmian.
romanshuvalov (2015-06-03 18:30:20+00:00): До конца не уверен, но кажется населенные пункты принято обозначать точкой, а жилую зону (landuse=residental) оставлять безымянной. Это и логично, т.к. жилых зон может быть много, это только у мелких деревень и сёл получается так, что всё можно одним полигоном охватить. К тому же в точке указывается еще и тип населенного пункта (hamlet, village, town и т.д.). Так что лучше, наверное, оставлять жилую зону безымянной, населенный пункт обозначать точкой.
Galaktionov (2015-06-04 04:49:26+00:00): исправил
Firefishy (2015-05-26 18:48:41+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap :) Happy mapping.
Rodrigo Rega (2016-01-04 23:25:51+00:00): [gl] Poderías detallar a orixe dos datos?. Cal é a rúa do Xeral Tella? Non figura en OSM.
[es] ¿Podrías detallar el origen de los datos? ¿Cuál es la calle Xeral Tella? No figura en OSM.
[en] Could you detail the sorce of the data? What is the Xeral Tella street? It is not included in OSM.
eBin (2015-05-28 06:56:29+00:00): Rzeszów: Budynki to usługa miasta nie krajowa :P
wmyrda (2015-05-28 07:03:44+00:00): akurat nie do końca. Otóż wiem, że Rzeszów ma własną mapę, ale na jej podstawie mapowało się mnie kilka razy wolniej także mapuję na podstawie mapy krajowej z którą w 100% widzę zgadza się to co jest zmapowane w centrum. Oznaczenie "krajowa" w takim wypadku tym samym błędne wbrew pozorom nie jest :P Być może stylistycznie powinno być inaczej
eBin (2015-05-28 07:49:43+00:00): Dlaczego wolniej? Obrysy w geoportalu są aktualizowane rzadziej (raz w roku?) więc mogą być trochę nieaktualne.
wmyrda (2015-05-28 07:54:13+00:00): tracert2 jakoś szybciej pobiera je z bazy krajowej. klik i obrys jest. Być może akurat trafiłem na duże obciążenie serwerów i stąd moje doświadczenia. Natomiast braki faktycznie na niej są także jak skończę to resztę dorysuję z bazy miejskiej
Владимир К (2015-11-05 12:47:45+00:00): wrong opening_hours tag. You entered it twice "opening_hours=opening_hours=Mo-Su 11:30-20:00", but should only "opening_hours=Mo-Su 11:30-20:00". Please, read the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours . OSM works with key=value, and there opening_hours is the key, and Mo-Su 11:30-20:00; Tu off is the value, not opening_hours=Mo-Su 11:30-20:00 Tu off
SomeoneElse (2015-11-05 15:44:42+00:00): @Владимир К : You might want to address that comment to the original mapper of "opening_hours=opening_hours..."; this is just a revert of a mechanical edit that assumed "all Tescos take Amex".
stoupa (2017-03-02 15:16:16+00:00): Ahoj,

(snad nevadí tykání)

chtěl jsem se zeptat na úpravu rozcestníku "Aueršperk (zřícenina)". V této sadě změn byl smazán, ale to se mi zdá divné. Jde o tento rozcestník:  http://api.openstreetmap.cz/table/id/7010

Historie tohoto bude je na adrese https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2836779308/history .

Je možné, že ten uzel byl smazán omylem a ten rozcestník tam stále je?

Díky a měj se,

T.
07Pepa (2017-03-02 20:19:08+00:00): Buď šlo o omyl... anebo tam chvíly nebyl... rozhidně v létě jsem ho tam viděl.... Vracím ho :) a tykání nevadí
stoupa (2017-03-02 20:39:27+00:00): Diky za rychlou reakci. V tom pripade jsem obnovil ten muj predesly rozcestnik z historie, co byl zameren a mel doplnujici informace. Tenkrat (cca 3 roky zpet) byl na ceste (na modre znacce) a u Auersperku nebylo nic. Mej se, T.