piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-10-01 10:37:04+00:00): Hello Florawi.
Please take a look at this webpage. 
Anthaas, a validator corrected the building on the left and removed a few round traces.
When you open this in your editor and take a close look at the building on the right side, I have my doubts if this is a building. What I see is a wall around a yard.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126791934
Best regards
Frans
sge444 (2022-11-02 21:32:42+00:00): Привет!
Подскажи, зачем убирать у заказников тег 

leisure=nature_reserve

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve
literan (2022-11-03 06:26:18+00:00): Привет!

затем, что это тег для заповедников, как и написано по приведенной тобой ссылке
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-03 20:22:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126957361 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the edits by the current account of PixelDubs. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6414 .  Some edits may be plausible; most are not, and mean that we can't trust the plausible ones.
risturiz (2022-09-29 22:49:02+00:00): Hola MarianaGG, se detectó que fueron borradas vías que aparecen claramente en la imagen satelital de Bing y estamos realizando pruebas con un sistema de tickets para resolver estos casos... Te invito para que revises el issue https://github.com/OSMLatam/pow/issues/3
Rogoyski (2022-10-17 20:51:24+00:00): Obszarów chodników nie oznaczamy tagami highway=footway + area=yes, tylko area:highway=footway.
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:49:11+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126791550
risturiz (2022-10-15 03:44:17+00:00): Hola MarianaGG, se detectó que fueron borradas vías que aparecen claramente en la imagen satelital de Bing y estamos realizando pruebas con un sistema de tickets para resolver estos casos... Te invito para que revises el issue https://github.com/OSMLatam/pow/issues/3
ivanbranco (2025-05-06 07:45:55+00:00): Ciao Luke, riesci a controllare questa relazione?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14637919

sembra stia creando dei problemi al routing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4704870
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-03 20:22:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126957361 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the edits by the current account of PixelDubs. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6414 .  Some edits may be plausible; most are not, and mean that we can't trust the plausible ones.
eggie (2022-09-29 18:20:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback..  Elk begin is moeilijk..  Vooral de accesstagging wie welke kant uit mag rijden. Is er ook een uitzondering voor fietsers om tegen het verkeer in te gaan. 
Voor brommers staat de uitzondering er wel bij? 

Ik heb oneway:bicycle=no en oneway:mofa=no toegevoegd.

Het zou hier anders niet routeren voor fietsers.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
PolyphemusNL (2022-09-29 18:35:52+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Dank je wel voor je toelichting, ik ben inderdaad nieuw, ondanks dat ik een oud account heb.

Er zit inderdaad een onderbord onder het verboden-in-te-rijden-bord, dat fietsers en bromfietsers uitgezonderd zijn.

Groeten,
Patrick
eggie (2022-09-29 18:37:34+00:00): Oke...  Het is nu al aangepast..
Veel plezier met mappen
Groet
eggie
PolyphemusNL (2022-09-29 18:59:43+00:00): Ik had me niet gerealiseerd dat ik de openstelling voor fietsers en bromfietsers ook aan moest geven, sorry :) Dank je voor de correctie en aanvulling, ik zal de tips doornemen voor de volgende keer.
Groeten.
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:48:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126793019
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:47:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126793021
JeroenHoek (2022-09-30 07:16:59+00:00): Why are you turning a parking space for buses into a parking lot? This doesn't make any sense.

I have reverted your changeset.
McCio (2022-09-30 09:44:24+00:00): Hi, sorry it was a wrong change that slipped while doing this maproulette quest: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/28573. I'm being more accurate now, also trying to review my past changes asap.
Thanks for reverting this
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:46:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126793120
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:44:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126793303
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-03 20:22:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126957361 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the edits by the current account of PixelDubs. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6414 .  Some edits may be plausible; most are not, and mean that we can't trust the plausible ones.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-05 23:23:21+00:00): neste caso, são construções separadas, devem permanecer assim no mapa
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:06:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Just 1 remark. * Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads. Try to avoid that.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126793574
aceman444 (2023-08-28 20:23:07+00:00): Zdravim, tie pripony (od mesta) a (od lesoparku) su divne. Zrejme sa tak tie objekty oficialne nevolaju, len upresnujete kde sa nachadzaju. Asi by to malo ist do inej znacky, ak je to vobec potrebne.
moonraver (2023-08-29 09:26:31+00:00): zdravim, taketo nazvy maju na oficialnom letaku (mape) co dostanu turisti pri vstupe na hrad. Dam to radsej do description? Zdalo sa mi to vhodne aby to videli cudzi turisti a nemuseli hladat, kde je brezina a kde mesto.
aceman444 (2023-08-29 09:31:13+00:00): Tak potom asi ok, ak to aj prevadzkovatel tak nazyva. Dakujem.
moonraver (2023-08-29 10:30:58+00:00): ale nedal som tam source. Co tam dat v tomto pripade ak to bolo z letaka? Inak mapujem asi rok a je sranda kolko chyb po sebe teraz nachadzam zo zaciatkov. Postupne to opravujem,esteze existuje overpass turbo.
moonraver (2023-08-29 10:36:45+00:00): tak nakoniec som nasiel, ze som to bral z webu pri pokladniach to maju uvedene iba ako zmienku o otvaracich hodinach,ze:

A) Pokladňa od mesta:
Pondelok - Nedeľa: 9:00 - 18:30

B) Pokladňa od lesoparku Brezina:

Takze rusim mena pokladni aj vchodov, nie su oficialne. Dam to do description.
aceman444 (2023-09-06 10:54:26+00:00): Chapem. Tazko posudit :)
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:01:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126793606
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:04:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  Just 1 remark.
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads. Please avoid that.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126793625
Frans S (2022-09-30 10:56:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126793675
ivanbranco (2022-09-29 19:13:25+00:00): Ciao McCio,

vedo che stai modificando un sacco di parcheggi con questa quest di MapRoulette. A me sembra molto un edit semi-automatico, qua per esempio non ti sei accorto che il parcheggio non è surface ma street-side, in altri changeset hai cambiato il tag di un parking space ignorando l'altro a pochissimi metri dall'altra parte della strada, in altri hai cambiato i tag di parking_space dentro a parking piu' grossi creando un parking dentro a un parking, in altri (tipo qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801897015) hai modificato un parking space in parking lasciando però il tag parking_space=* che richiede il tag amenity=parking_space ecc.ecc.
McCio (2022-09-29 19:36:07+00:00): Ciao ivan,
sì, la quest va a modificare solo il tag amenity (https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/28573), per questo altri tag non sono stati cambiati (tipo il tag parking, e i tag parking_space rimasti che hai notato).
I parking dentro ad altri parking non li avevo notati, mi sembravano tutti accanto. Farò un giro a ricontrollare gli edit che ho fatto per sicurezza.
Per i parking vicini ignorati, mi dava fastidio anche a me che saltasse da una parte all'altra, quindi da una certa ho iniziato a fare solo quelli vicini in Italia.
Frans S (2022-09-30 10:52:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126794197
Frans S (2022-09-30 10:51:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126794204
Frans S (2022-09-30 12:07:31+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126794212
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-01 12:05:31+00:00): Hi Michelle vd Griend.

May we know the reason behind deleting almost 700 mapped building of a different contributor? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
fititnt (2023-12-04 01:51:27+00:00): Ok, let me try to understand what happened here and no revert happened.

Over 4000 deletes (without any explanation) using hashtags from a new Organized Editing Activity and no one reverted at the time?

The old data was from a 2019 event (not even the same new activity) added by mappers and (since several ways are v2 before deletion) likely edited again by validators.

I don't know who keeps watching changes from "#missingmaps" / "#msf" in addition to the specific projects (like the 13555), but this kind of problem cannot be left unsolved.
blackboxlogic (2022-10-04 02:21:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126794449
Frans S (2022-09-30 10:37:04+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped, anyhow, what could be identified on the very bad imagery. Please use the Mapbox Imagery for a clearer view. Don't forget to adjust the offset.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126794533
Frans S (2022-09-30 12:06:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126794555
AjBelnuovo (2022-09-30 02:39:05+00:00): Por que a tag ref , foi alterada para reg:INEP ?
adrianojbr (2022-09-30 12:35:26+00:00): Buenas!

Foi alterada para ref:INEP porque é a etiqueta documentada para código de estabelecimentos estudantis: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:ref:INEP

Aproveito para informar que também foi aprovada uma padronização para o Brasil:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#Mapeamento_brasileiro

Abraço!
AjBelnuovo (2022-09-30 14:36:09+00:00): Li as novas instruções , fiquei surpreso já vai em sentido contrário em 2 tag' a tudo que até agora tinha sido feito , a name ( que antigamente era obrigatório o nome completo ) e a operator ( que vai no sentido contrário das definições da Wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:type . E que me leva a perguntar : como serão designados os outros operadores que tem uma secretaria de governo como gestora ? )
adrianojbr (2022-09-30 15:06:05+00:00): Talvez a página de aprovação da proposta para padronização das escolas no Brasil ajude a responder seus questionamentos:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=2154117

Em suma, posso dizer que quanto ao nome, a regra geral continua sendo nome completo em name=*. Porém, para escolas há uma regra especial. Emprestando do Direito, aplica-se que "regra especial prevalece sobre a regra geral".

Assim, os outros estabelecimentos ficam sem padronização por enquanto, até que alguém se "incomode" e tope o desafio de propor uma padronização.

Pessoalmente, eu prefiro usar "Governo do Estado de Santa Catarina" para estabelecimentos estaduais, em vez de usar o nome das secretarias, mesmo porque essas são mais facilmente criadas, alteradas ou extintas.

Se eu precisasse extrair as escolas estaduais, bastaria combinar amenity=school + operator="Governo do Estado de Santa Catarina".

Mas enfim, essa é outra discussão, que se para avançar seria melhor levar ao fórum ou grupo no Telegram.

Abraço!
AjBelnuovo (2022-09-30 15:30:27+00:00): Indo consultar os links que me enviou , encontrei este link : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Brazil/Padroniza%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_escolas_p%C3%BAblicas_do_Brasil

que me parece que cancela a proposta .
adrianojbr (2022-09-30 16:51:34+00:00): Esse link é da proposta onde foi aprovada a padronização. Clique ali em "View proposal content" que levará ao link que enviei anteriormente, em que há as justificativas e votos.
AjBelnuovo (2022-10-01 12:07:05+00:00): Eu vi a proposta e a votação , só que ela foi arquivada e pra mim perde o valor . A proposta deveria ser reavaliada , já que no mínimo uma decisão errada , a de tratar o tipo de operador de uma escola gerenciada por um órgão governamental como públic , que está em desacordo com artigo já pacificado na Wiki . 
E olhando a votação , um dos argumentos , é que não existiria muitos nomes em duplicata , o que não é uma realidade nos estados do nordeste .
adrianojbr (2022-10-01 17:51:13+00:00): Não, a proposta foi aprovada (só ver o status dela). A discussão é que foi arquivada para não gerar confusão com a documentação.

Já sobre reavaliação, pode ser feita, mas os locais para discussão adequados são o fórum ou grupo do Telegram. Em seguida, abrir uma nova proposta e seguir os ritos para aprovação.

A respeito de ser realidade do nordeste, houve votantes do país inteiros. Inclusive a proposta foi anunciada no fórum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58732 -- obs.: há um processo de migração do fórum para outra plataforma), na lista de emails (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2021-May/012951.html) e no grupo de suporte da comunidade brasileira no Telegram (https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte/19853).

Eu até concordo com teus argumentos, mas a decisão atual da comunidade é aquela que está na Wiki.

E, como disse antes, é passível de revisão, mas precisa passar pelos ritos necessários.

Abraço!
AjBelnuovo (2022-10-08 20:42:07+00:00): Gostaria de saber se esta discussão poderia ser reaberta , já que encontrei 2 escolas , na mesma cidade , com o mesmo mudando só a sigla :

https://inepdata.inep.gov.br/analytics/saw.dll?Dashboard&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FCenso%20da%20Educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20B%C3%A1sica%2F_portal%2FCat%C3%A1logo%20de%20Escolas&Page=Detalhamento%20Escola&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22F%20-%20Catalogo%20Escola%22.%22C%C3%B3digo%20Entidade%22&P3=%2235224637%22

https://inepdata.inep.gov.br/analytics/saw.dll?Dashboard&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FCenso%20da%20Educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20B%C3%A1sica%2F_portal%2FCat%C3%A1logo%20de%20Escolas&Page=Detalhamento%20Escola&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22F%20-%20Catalogo%20Escola%22.%22C%C3%B3digo%20Entidade%22&P3=%2235202289%22

https://inepdata.inep.gov.br/analytics/saw.dll?Dashboard&PortalPath=%2Fshared%2FCenso%20da%20Educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20B%C3%A1sica%2F_portal%2FCat%C3%A1logo%20de%20Escolas&Page=Detalhamento%20Escola&Action=Navigate&P0=1&P1=eq&P2=%22F%20-%20Catalogo%20Escola%22.%22C%C3%B3digo%20Entidade%22&P3=%2235224637%22

E com a nova tag para o cadastro no INEP , a escola não é encontrada