piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:18:52+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Nakaner-repair (2016-03-02 20:52:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37574672 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of Jever61 which used data of the official cadastre of State of Lower Saxony. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37430497
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:18:46+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Nakaner-repair (2016-03-02 20:52:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37574672 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of Jever61 which used data of the official cadastre of State of Lower Saxony. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37430497
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:18:41+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:17:56+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:17:49+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:17:44+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Nakaner-repair (2016-03-02 20:52:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37574672 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of Jever61 which used data of the official cadastre of State of Lower Saxony. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37430497
Nakaner-repair (2016-03-02 20:52:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37574672 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of Jever61 which used data of the official cadastre of State of Lower Saxony. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37430497
Nakaner-repair (2016-03-02 20:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37574672 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of Jever61 which used data of the official cadastre of State of Lower Saxony. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37430497
yellowsoar (2015-12-17 15:31:18+00:00): 這些是什麼東西？

小米射槍 (3896507683, v1)
來我家嘛~夾娃娃機 (3896507682, v1)
來呦!搏聖杯 奪大獎 (3896507681, v1)
打籃球打彈珠 (3896507680, v1)
阿宗麻將 (3896507679, v1)
籃球九宮格 (3896507678, v1)
Supaplex (2015-12-17 15:32:18+00:00): 擺攤的夜市攤位吧
yellowsoar (2015-12-17 16:02:09+00:00): 看起來是夜市攤位沒錯
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:17:17+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Сергій Дубик (2015-12-20 12:49:22+00:00): Привіт!
На POI не потрібно ставити адресні теги addr:city
addr:housenumber
addr:postcode
addr:street
якщо ця точка знаходиться всередині будівлі, що вже має адресні теги.
Можна хіба додавати addr:door (№ офісу, кв.),  level (поверх), addr:full (сюди можна писати повну адресу).
Nakaner-repair (2016-03-02 20:52:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37574672 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of Jever61 which used data of the official cadastre of State of Lower Saxony. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37430497
Polarbear (2015-12-18 00:01:54+00:00): ... JOSM values -2.13; 3.34
SomeoneElse (2015-12-18 22:49:16+00:00): You changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170366314/history from joining to Warwick Road to not joining to Warwick Road.  Are you sure that this is correct?  My recollection is that there are no new-build estates north of Sleetmoor Lane; I suspect the houses have been here for at least 20 years.  I'm pretty sure though that a footpath doesn't go through a building (although http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135473044 , not that far away, does!).  If you're unsure and haven't actually surveyed the area, perhaps a better approach rather than guessing would be to add an OSM note explaining the problem and what needs checking?  There are local mappers, so it will get picked up.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-18 22:49:47+00:00): For completeness, the change as shown by osmhv:

http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=36008619
Polarbear (2015-12-19 11:25:19+00:00): Thanks for the hint. It certainly does not connect to Warwick Rd as it was drawn, as there are the residential house, garden barriers and different front yard layout. There is a structure in the aerial that winds around the gardens, runs through the gap between the building groups and connects to Tower Close. I have extended the path accordingly, leaving a FIXME that the accessibility needs ground verification. Similarly, node 1815165411 nearby probably connects to the road. 
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=36042918

As for your counterexample, that is different of course as it runs through a pub. The Warwick road residents are more unlikely to serve you a pint when you try to run through their kitchen :-)
Polarbear (2015-12-19 11:33:08+00:00): BTW, there is a mini_roundabout visible in bing on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/320186872/history that has never been tagged, is it still there?
SomeoneElse (2015-12-19 20:23:50+00:00): Re the mini-roundabout, I'm not sure (despite only walking past last Sunday afternoon)!  Add a note or a fixme - someone will pick it up.
NetWormKido (2015-12-19 05:06:04+00:00): Привет, то что ты обозначаешь как дачи (landuse=allotments), должно быть обозначено как жилая сельская местность (двумя тегами landuse=residential + residential=rural). Переделай, пожалуйста, везде, где неправильно обозначил.
anyrain (2015-12-19 07:54:12+00:00): Сделано. Кроме Нижненикольский и Крестьянский. Это дачи.
NetWormKido (2015-12-19 08:56:20+00:00): Отлично!
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:17:07+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
UT93 (2019-12-09 20:16:32+00:00): Grüsse. Es ist mir aufgefallen, dass diesem Änderungssatz, die doppelte Verwendung von Hausnummern entsprungen ist.
SOSM (2019-12-09 23:38:02+00:00): Das ist doch extrem lange her und nach 5 Jahren im Detail nicht nachvollziehbar, also  einfach die doppelten Nummern von den Umrissen entfernen und gut ist.
audtr (2023-06-29 19:17:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3757523
KKS (2015-12-19 14:33:34+00:00): І чого вони стали trunk ?
Наче ж trunk до автостради, яких офіційно в Україні аж ОДНА.
iWowik (2015-12-21 11:21:32+00:00): Так автострада это ж motorway.
Ну и как им не быть trunk, коли иначе trunk с юга обрывается при входе в город
и важность дороги моментально исчезает.
5m4u9 (2015-12-17 21:31:46+00:00): Hola, de verdad gracias por añadir datos al mapa.

Debo advertir que hay errores, el perímetro de cada propiedad debe ser una pared (barrier=wall) y no landuse. Además, los edificios son construcciones (building=house o apartaments o commercial or others).

Demás información de ale, amc, ame, amf y name y otros. no son necesarios porque del propio dibujo se puede obtener. 

Aquí no seguimos la forma de proceder de AutoCAD o ArcGIS, las construcciones deben estar separadas de las calles y nunca unidas.

Por favor, corregir calles C1 por Calle 1 y así. 

Gracias!
habi (2020-04-24 07:30:53+00:00): Ciao
Du hast Oppis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3896674464/history) als shop=yes getaggt.
Kannst du den Shop noch etwas genauer spezifizieren?
Mit einer Websuche habe ich keine Infos gefunden...

PS: Ich gelange via https://maproulette.org/challenge/9400/ hierher :)
highbuilder (2020-04-25 14:57:45+00:00): Hallo
Danke für deinen Hinweis, ich hab vor Ort nochmals geschaut, dieses Geschäft existiert nicht mehr, ich hab es gelöscht, siehe 84109105
habi (2020-04-25 19:01:46+00:00): Subi, danke fürs nachschauen!
highbuilder (2020-04-25 19:02:26+00:00): kein Problem ;-)
cadsauxk (2016-12-04 16:30:16+00:00): Oi Elias, de onde você tirou que a AMG-1730 também é a MG-262, e porque você está colocando um código de referência no campo de nome próprio?
obrigado
cadsauxk (2016-12-04 17:19:09+00:00): Bom, já verifiquei, a MG-262 não chega em Ouro Preto, vai somente até Mariana. Verifiquei no DER-MG e já fiz as correções.
abraço
trigpoint (2015-12-17 17:56:38+00:00): Hi
You seem to be making a lot of edits in Shropshire, mostly adding landuse which in itself is not bad, however many of your additions are very simplified and often do not map the areas accurately. A mapper with your number of edits really should be taking more care.
For example www.openstreetmap.org/way/386349818 which is one of many I could have picked, is represented as a rectangle with just 4 nodes, it clearly needs to have many more. The landuse actually cuts through a building.
This style of mapping causes work for mappers who whant to improve the map of bu adding buildings, fences and hedges as the first thing they need to do is fix the inaccurate landuse.
I am sorry to sound negative but in the past much of Shrewsbury was mapped as broad brush landuse and once buildings began to be added the landuse was in most cases needed to be fixed before these could be added.
Glucosamine (2015-12-22 08:50:30+00:00): Thankyou for feedback. I will hold my hand up to simplifying farmyards, but I'm puzzled by your example - if I've got the right link then this farmyard looks pretty rectangular to me. I see that you live in Shropshire, whereas I visit, but if you've looked at my changesets you'll see that I concentrate on open country. I entirely agree when it comes to large towns such as Shrewsbury, but much of rural UK has little or no of the farmyard / woodland / track information which I find useful when walking / running / biking. The balance between broader brush and fine detail is always hard to get right at different stages in map evolution - I'd be pleased to be referred to guidance or discuss further - please do message me. In the meantime, I'll try to add more points in future, though I'm currently mousing left handed due to RSI in the right which can sometimes limit my accuracy.
iWowik (2016-01-26 20:36:52+00:00): А что там именно Б/Н? 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386349980
Вроде строение есть,...
Я понимаю, что импрот, но в такой форме уже и не понять, что за поле было Б/Н,
Случай не единичен.
NGC6720 (2015-12-21 15:34:17+00:00): Could you please specify the reason for your edit? Why "landuse=grass" instead of "leisure=park"?
gscholz (2023-10-22 06:56:55+00:00): Hi  thivya maheswararajan,
your recent changesets have left behind a lot of errors regarding duplicate buildings, duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=81.52227&lat=7.91979&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=36011892

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
adiatmad (2023-10-24 03:19:46+00:00): I'd like to join the conversation. I've tried to fix >10K duplicate nodes and some other issues while using the JOSM validator in this area. I'm curious, why do these numerous issues show up as relatively minor in OSM Inspector? In other words, how can I efficiently identify distinct areas with thousands of issues, like this case, using OSM Inspector?
gscholz (2023-10-24 06:46:32+00:00): Sorry,
this is obviously the wrong (old) changeset. Here is one of the newer ones involved in this issue:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142702193#map=18/7.91943/81.52220

Guido
malenki (2016-02-06 14:06:45+00:00): Ich habe mal den Thalesweg mitsamt dem Namen wiederhergestellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45197954/history

Das ist einer der Gründe, weshalb man nicht löschen und neu eintragen sollte. Immer wieder gehen den Mappern dabei "versehentlich" Daten verloren…
ghostrider44 (2016-03-28 16:23:30+00:00): Hallo Wariner,
am 17.12.2015 hast du den gemeinsamen Geh-/Radweg entlang der Stuttgarter Straße in Bietigheim zwischen der Ulrichstraße und Höhe Geisinger Straße von path ungerechtfertigt in footway umgezeichnet. Diese Strecke ist mit Zeichen 240 ausgeschildert. Der Eintrag footway ist deshalb falsch. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Danach ist path zu verwenden.
Ich bitte dich, dies zu berichtigen.
Gruß
ghostrider44
maraf24 (2015-12-21 00:58:24+00:00): Co to jest: "jeden,_święty,_katolicki_i_apostolski_Kościół,_jedyna_prawdziwa_religia"?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-12-17 19:33:30+00:00): Proszę o wskazanie źródła tej rewelacji: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386367411
maro21 (2019-08-28 20:52:21+00:00): Skąd są takie dziwne adresy? https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.16319/16.93404
maraf24 (2019-09-02 17:38:02+00:00): Zmianowy nie odpowiada nigdy na pytania tutaj i prawdopodobnie też nigdy nie czyta tych komentarzy.
Z tego co zauważyłem, korzysta z różnych dziwnych (tj. trudno dostępnych lub nielicencjonowanych) żródeł, łącznie z Googlem.
Jeśli masz wątpliwości co do edycji i nie znalazłeś nic, co by je rozwiało - usuń/popraw jego zmiany.
joost schouppe (2016-01-10 11:12:50+00:00): Dag Marc,
Dezelfde opmerking als tevoren. Een andere mapper heeft hier al je bijdrage ongedaan gemaakt. Maar kan het dat je ook een restaurant had toegevoegd? Want volgens mij is dat dan per ongeluk ook verwijderd.
Oblivion (2016-01-07 08:28:17+00:00): Hi,
Weltbild hat die Filiale 2015 geschlossen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34718481
literan (2015-12-18 13:04:00+00:00): зачем эстакаду открыли? пока въезда на нее нет.
OldIvantey (2015-12-18 15:51:22+00:00): вчера там спокойно проехал
literan (2015-12-18 16:00:28+00:00): там блоки пластиковые иногда раздвигают, и можно проехать. Но это ж не значит, что надо через нее маршруты строить!
maraf24 (2015-12-18 08:27:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386375356
Bardzo bym prosił o więcej uwagi przy przenoszeniu adresów na obrysy, bo to jest już trzeci przypadek naniesienia przez Ciebie węzła miejsowości na budynek.
maraf24 (2015-12-18 08:34:46+00:00): Odtworzyłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2083564488/history
maraf24 (2015-12-29 00:29:44+00:00): A co to za ulica Pańska?
carciofo (2016-03-03 10:38:12+00:00): Thank you for your contribution. When creating parking isles, please create individual roads for each isle instead of using the same object to overlap the service roads, as overlapping roads are raised as a data quality error.
malenki (2015-12-21 17:20:17+00:00): Ich habe das gelöschte node wiederhergestellt und in suburb geändert. Mehr hättest du nicht machen brauchen.
Den von dir erstellten Weg mit "suburb" zu habe ich zu einem Gebäude umgebaut.

Wie heißt eigentlich der Ort nördlich von Rehlingen?
malenki (2015-12-22 19:42:39+00:00): PS: Habe eben festgestellt, dass ich die Daten gestern doch nicht hochgeladen habe. Soeben nachgeholt.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-10 12:28:25+00:00): Hello, 
can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386386007 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3897043914 are?  It seems odd to have a "naval base" offshore here?
naoliv (2017-06-18 22:14:38+00:00): Casilva, esses nomes de rua você obteve de onde?
Deanna Earley (2017-08-06 22:17:28+00:00): Hello Robbie.
This changeset adds a load of nonsensical turn restrictions to way 297860419 (Holcot Lane).
Would you mind tidying these up or removing them?

Thanks!
robbieonsea (2017-08-07 08:17:34+00:00): Fairly sure I didn't add them, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5465217/history
However I may try to fix them in time...
maraf24 (2015-12-21 00:56:14+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386393826
1. nieprawidłowo oznaczone, bo brak tagu mówiącego, co to jest
2. nieprawidłowa nazwa-bo to jest opis, a nie nazwa
karitotp (2015-12-22 15:49:59+00:00): There are some buildings with mistake of type: crossing building. Could you check out?
ediyes (2016-01-27 13:51:59+00:00): Done!!

Thanks for the review.
iGormilhit (2016-07-20 08:23:34+00:00): Hi,

I'm wondering if the tag "highway=footway" wouldn't be better than "highway=path", because in some rendering maps, for the nodes "ford=yes", a car is used, which is a bit weird for that place.
iGormilhit (2016-07-20 08:24:44+00:00): Hi again,

I was thinking about this path : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124221949
BushmanK (2015-12-18 17:34:20+00:00): Вы в курсе, что внешний контур https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379196375 по старому снимку нарисовали, вместе с пристроенными и еще не снесенными торговыми рядами?
uryevich (2015-12-18 20:24:56+00:00): Теперь в курсе, спасибо. Заходил в это здание неоднократно с главного входа когда навесы ещё были.
BushmanK (2015-12-19 06:47:18+00:00): Вообще, его в любом случае в деталях не нарисовать. Во-первых, там эта пресловутая мембранная крыша, вогнутая. И она не только большую арену перекрывает, но и малую. Потом там есть перепад высот, потому стилобат выше с южной стороны. Плюс лестницы, являющиеся конструктивным элементом. Я сам думал этим как-то заняться, но прикинул, на сколько оно будет все равно отличаться, и плюнул. А так - у меня есть даже точные размеры всего сооружения где-то.
karitotp (2015-12-22 15:52:10+00:00): There is a mistake of type: crossing building.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3897176114/history
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2021-11-05 08:10:54+00:00): km/h tagging
SomeoneElse (2015-12-20 21:22:41+00:00): Hi, you've added "layer=+1" to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354952697/history - just wondering if that was deliberate?

I spotted it while importing OSM data into a rendering database.  I don't think it's a problem as such; just checking in case you wanted to tag it as something else.
maraf24 (2015-12-21 00:52:09+00:00): Usunąłem, nazwa już była na całym obszarze.
user_5359 (2015-12-18 04:12:28+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kleiner Hinweis: Namen von Objekten sind nicht dazu da, seine Fragen an die Gemeinschaft zu richten. Ich habe mir deshalb erlaubt Deine Anfrage aus den Namen des Baches zu löschen und als Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/484672 (Standard für solche Themen) zu formulieren.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-17 23:02:26+00:00): Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/484613 and the change to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4085184/history I'd suggest that you talk to the author of the tags concerned, which I believe is Hilton Hotels themselves.  That way they'll not add the "wrong" tag next time.  Also there seems to be some tag duplication between http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4085184/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79612055 .
inas (2016-01-24 08:04:37+00:00): This relation is very ugly, and very inaccurate, cutting across all kinds of actual features.

Can you expand on why it is actually required?
TheSwavu (2016-02-09 07:39:30+00:00): When you create a job with the OSM Tasking Manager (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Tasking_Manager) you need to specify an area that the job covers. 

I was leaving it for the time being in case I needed it again. At some point in the future it could grow up to be the admin_level=7 boundary for Sydney, otherwise if it really is bothering you feel free to delete it.
TheSwavu (2016-02-14 01:13:15+00:00): I've updated this to be the region boundary for Sydney so please don't delete.
inas (2016-02-15 04:19:41+00:00): It's looking much better now.  Thanks for your effort.
karitotp (2015-12-22 15:48:15+00:00): There are some buildings with mistake of type: crossing building, could you check out?
ediyes (2015-12-22 19:36:35+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. Here is my change, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36112270
trigpoint (2015-12-18 17:05:48+00:00): Al Bela has currently closed in the opening hours tag, is this still the case?
Also there is little point adding a smoking=no tag to a resturant as that is the law and can be assumed for all commercial premises. Tagging that there is an outside area may be useful if it exists.
Alecs01 (2015-12-18 18:46:16+00:00): grazie dell'aggiunta, però A52 va inserito come ref=* e non come name=*, ho coretto e aggiunto il nuovo tratto alla relazione che c'era già: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1281019
ATOM_1971 (2015-12-19 22:43:33+00:00): Grazie per la correzione!
Yo Is That Your New Ride (2015-12-18 00:39:07+00:00): This edit was a test to see if by calling this road primary, it would break up Prospect so I could add the County BB designation to the part west of here.  (This street is the line.)
Glassman (2015-12-18 18:17:54+00:00): Nice addition. Porcupine peak isn't even in the USGS's own GNIS database.
jorge_o (2015-12-18 16:40:03+00:00): Hola CENTSOARER:
La importación de los mpios de INEGI no fue de todo bien. Pero el equipo de importación está corrigiendo los errores. En el caso de aquí, donde borraste nueve relaciones, estoy seguro que no está bien lo que hiciste. ¿Qué hacemos? Yo puedo revertir este changeset?
CENTSOARER (2015-12-20 05:11:12+00:00): Espero que lo hayas hecho, al parecer el problema está resuelto (yo mismo ya lo he verificado) en los datos pero el renderizado sigue siendo incorrecto en todos los niveles de zoom.
jorge_o (2015-12-20 15:20:06+00:00): Hola centsoarer:
Lo hizo andreas del equipo de importación de los mpios. Lo que pasa es que el mapa no refleja directamente cambios hechos. Con la opción layers que está a la derecha puedes ver los datos. Saludos
Jorge
CENTSOARER (2024-03-08 21:57:02+00:00): En su momento no pude discutir esta situación, pero este polígono de área natural protegida de la Sierra del Abra-Tanchipa está mal, según el decreto con el que se promulgó en 1994. Los que importaron esta información hicieron snapping en los límites municipales, pero esto es incorrecto, pues la reserva abarca la superficie de dos municipios. Si no es posible reactivar esta discusión, haré los cambios necesarios más adelante.
MKnight (2018-12-08 16:33:27+00:00): wow! nice hard work.
samely (2015-12-22 14:29:13+00:00): Hi. Take a look, there are more buildings to map.
ediyes (2015-12-22 14:55:18+00:00): Hola samely,
Gracias por su observación, en nuestro siguiente proyecto http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/14#  se mapearan todos los edificios que faltan.