piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2021-03-09 13:11:56+00:00): Hi, DUGA

My name is Yuliya and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this. The link w882659434 was added according to our telemetry data. However, now I see that this maneuver violates the traffic rules, so I removed my edits in the changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100708922). I truly apologize for any inconvenience these edits may have caused. 

Thank you,
Yuliya
ralley (2020-12-09 16:54:07+00:00): This appears to be vandalism, please revert
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532529
ralley (2020-12-09 16:54:33+00:00): This appears to be vandalism, please revert
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532686
ralley (2020-12-09 16:55:14+00:00): This appears to be vandalism, please revert
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95532904
abakus_uploader (2020-12-09 23:30:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Władysław Komorek (2020-12-10 07:16:27+00:00): Poprawiono.
dmlu (2021-01-29 01:25:32+00:00): Hello,
David from the Data Working Group here.

It seems that you used "Singapore OneMap" as a source in this changeset. Is that source compatible with OpenStreetMap? More information can be found here: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility.

Kind regards,
David
dmlu (2021-01-29 01:32:27+00:00): Hi, 
My apologies, I missed the entry in JOSM: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps/Singapore. Feel free to ignore my previous comment!

Happy mapping 😊
David
eggie (2020-12-09 07:58:34+00:00): Beste Kees,
Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. Dit gebeurt meestal om het spel PokemonGo te beïnvloeden.
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665

In dit geval dus de landuse intact laten en één layer leisure=park over beide stukken heen leggen en daar de naam opzetten.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-09 08:50:35+00:00): Kees .. ik heb er even één park van gemaakt en paadjes toegevoegd..  De landuse teruggezet naar landuse=grass en losse bomen. Het zal vast nog wel veranderen in de toekomst. 
MVG,
eggie
lonvia (2021-02-02 15:27:13+00:00): Please do not add phantom network nodes where there are none. This network obviously functions by going from named guidepost to named guidepost. There is no need for nodes with `rwn_ref` in such a case. And adding tons of refs with 'o-o' is just tagging for your test script.
Peter Elderson (2021-02-02 15:49:28+00:00): It's a pilot for a local walking node network with named nodes instead of numbered nodes. It's a true node network, it just uses node names instead of node numbers. Sadly for them, there is no support for named nodes yet. I'll contact the local french mappers that the pilot has to finish soon.
lonvia (2021-02-02 16:05:47+00:00): Why would there be no support? There are route relations that function as node connections and have a network:type=node_network. There are named guideposts that function as the nodes. I'd use 'from' and 'to' instead of 'name' on the relations. But apart from that everything was mapped correctly as far as I could see until you added the phantom ref tags to the relations and the phantom `rwn_ref` to the nodes.
Peter Elderson (2021-02-02 19:19:49+00:00): We are also testing the network integrity tools and the node network planner. These still require **n_ref on nodes and ref on the node2node routes.  We  are working to lift this requirement if a node name is present on the node. In the end, from and to on the node2node section would also not be needed, because there are labels (either **n_ref or **n_name) on the start and end nodes  which are also the start node of the first way and the end node of the last way, so they are already in there. 
On waymarkedtrails, if the guideposts themselves are mapped as objects carrying the name, that shows up nicely as the name of the nearby network node.
lonvia (2021-02-03 09:51:54+00:00): That is not acceptable. You do not enter bogus data into OpenStreetMap to work around short-comings in your software. You are not the only user of this data and OSM is not your private playground.
TravGW (2020-12-09 15:11:44+00:00): I noticed you changed a service road to a track. You’re not entirely wrong. The wiki for highway=track does say, “This tag represents roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc.; often unpaved (unsealed) but may apply to paved tracks as well, that are suitable for two-track vehicles, such as tractors or jeeps.” However it also says, “Roads which provide access to a specific property, such as residential driveways or industrial access roads, should be tagged highway=service or a higher road class.” Based on this latter statement I have been tagging roads which lead to oil wells, storage tanks, other industrial locations as driveways (highway=service, service=driveway, access=private) or at the very least just a service road.
rkkarnee (2020-12-10 09:55:27+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for reviewing the edit and the information about the area. I've made the necessary changes according to your information under changeset(#95605894). We have already informed our editors regarding this issue, we will make sure this won't happen again. Please let us know in case of issues/concerns with our edits we will fix them earliest.
Regards,
rkkarnee
Dacc1 (2020-12-09 08:05:42+00:00): I used Bing aerial imagery instead of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)
limes11 (2020-12-11 11:40:47+00:00): Hallo, 

der Weg ist laut Note gut begehbar. Wenn er existiert, dann bitte nicht auf disused setzen. Der Zugang ist durch access=no bereits korrekt klassifiziert.

Gruss, Limes
Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (2020-12-11 12:57:17+00:00): Hallo Limes,
danke für deine Kontakaufnahme!
Ich habe von meinen Kollgen aus der Nationalparkwacht gehört, dass der Weg stark zugebrochen ist und auch am Anfag viele Bäume quer über dem Weg liegen. Sie haben mir auch Fotos vom Anfangs- und Endpunkt gegeben.
Kann ich die hier irgendiwe hochladen/verlinken? 
Viele Grüße,
Anne
limes11 (2020-12-11 19:41:32+00:00): Hallo,

Links kannst du hier posten. Hochladen geht leider nicht, du muesstest die irgendwo anders bereitsstellen. Das waere sicher im Angesicht der Note 2457855 hilfreich.

So ein kommentarloses disused sieht nicht gut aus, dafuer gibt es ja gerade Changesetkommentare. Zudem muss das zu den anderen Tags passen. "Trail_visibility=intermediate" und der Eintrag "Gut begehbarer Weg" sprechen eine andere Sprache.

Ich habe keine Ortskenntnisse und nur aufgrund der Note reagiert. Gut moeglich, dass sich noch Ortskundige hier dazu melden.

Besten Gruss, Limes
Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (2020-12-14 12:41:47+00:00): Hallo,
ok, danke für die Erläuterung!
Mir wurde von einem langjährigen OSMler erklärt, "disused" wäre der richtige tag für Wege, die existieren (und auch gut sichtbar sind), aber der Anfang versperrt ist (wie hier durch umgefallenen Bäume) und nicht beräumt werden, also die Absicht klar ist, dass dieser Wege nicht begangen werden soll. 

Viele Grüße,
Anne
limes11 (2020-12-14 17:26:11+00:00): Ich tagge keinen Weg mit disused, der gut erkennbar ist, aber wenn der Einstieg ausreichend blockiert ist, dann kann man das machen. Das muss dann aber am Weg mit vernünftigen Tags erklärt werden ("Gut begehbarer Weg" ist dabei nicht hilfreich), sonst kommt der nächste Wanderer, der den Weg kennt, und entfernt das disused wieder. Die Befürchtung, dass Daten versteckt werden, wurde ja bereits im Hinweis geäußert. Ein Foto vom blockierten Einstieg wäre in der Tat nicht schlecht.

Gruss, Limes
Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (2020-12-21 13:52:21+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe die Fotos unter
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=13vGFVew8A0FpH2_JcWxjRXPfZJDz_DFvr hochgeladen, hoffe, der Link funktioniert?


H
Tomas Straupis (2020-12-10 08:35:02+00:00): I've disassembled farmland/residential areas from multipolygons to simple polygons, and fixed topology errors (overlapping polygons) in LITHUANIA, not in Moscow as your changeset comment states :-)
osm_saint-louis (2020-12-10 09:05:30+00:00): Thank you, again. For certain reasons I'm mapping in the former Eastern Prussia region of Russia ... and I did not remark, that I left that area, mapping in Lithuania. But maybe to divide the real residential area into smaller parts of an multipolygon is a better way than to map a huge area as a residential one which includes also such being used otherwise (i. e. as meadows and/or farmland)?
Tomas Straupis (2020-12-10 09:25:58+00:00): Yes, smaller more precise areas are better, but it is not good to combine them into one multipolygon which then creates one geometry in GIS database. Another thing is topology: areas should not overlap one another. We have automated QA checks for this in Lithuania.
Vinber-Pro (2020-12-09 15:33:05+00:00): Bonjour,
vous semblez avoir embarqué le tag source pour la pharmacie, erreur de copié-collé ?
Bonne carto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95536834
ThomR (2020-12-10 16:04:00+00:00): Bonjour, 
J'avais extrait le ponctuel à partir du polygone du bâti sous ID mais effectivement, mauvais filtre des tags. Merci pour la remarque, j'ai corrigé
CRCulver (2020-12-27 20:49:06+00:00): With regard to Strada Lăcrămioarelor 4, Cluj, please do not create multiple nodes with the same addr:housenumber for each scară. These are considered bugs in Osmose, they add to all the things that need to be fixed in the Osmose layer.

Instead, please tag the entire building itself with a single addr:housenumber=4, and then create entrance=staircase nodes (placed on the building way) for each scară.
Armin Gheorghina (2020-12-28 08:10:14+00:00): Hello CRCulver,

Thanks for the feedback. Didn't knew that Osmose considers nodes with same housenumbers as bugs. That being said the nodes were created by user the_badmann and I removed the building tag from them, but I agree with you the building itself should be tagged with housenumber information + node with entrance should be the go-to method in these cases. 

Thanks,
Armin G
Nielkrokodil (2020-12-10 06:14:31+00:00): Schaut super aus!
Du könntest noch die Fehlerhinweis-Nummer (2403053) in der Änderungsbeschreibung angeben, dann tut sich jemand leichter, bzw kennt sich auch aus, falls es mehrere Hinweise an diesem Ort geben sollte.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2020-12-29 18:25:01+00:00): لماذا قمت بحذف الفياض ؟
Why did you delete so many areas on the map?
Vinber-Pro (2020-12-09 15:27:30+00:00): :D :D :D Super
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95539553
Dacc1 (2020-12-09 09:15:01+00:00): Used source as Bing aerial imagery instead of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)
Warin61 (2020-12-15 07:02:35+00:00): Base map will give you bridges - solid lines either side of road/track.
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-12-18 00:17:05+00:00): Hi Martin Sauter I changed the classification and geometry of this way (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/882697812) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
canfe (2020-12-09 19:30:00+00:00): La via di servizio del distributore non credo sia a livello -1. Forse volevi mettere un building passage?
juminet (2020-12-10 20:03:31+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Baptiste et bienvenue sur OSM!

Vous avez cartographié un point à l'intérieur d'un batiment comme "parc" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8208939997#map=19/49.82177/5.04603), n'y a t'il pas une erreur? 

En cherchant sur le web, il semble que ce soit un centre d'hébergement, pour lequel vous pouvez utiliser le tag tourism=hotel ou tourism=guest_house. 

N'hésitez pas à répondre à ce message si vous avez des questions.

Merci de vos contributions et happy mapping!

juminet
SekeRob (2020-12-09 13:34:07+00:00): Hi, how is this getting flagged, which report(?), when these innocuous typos do not show up at the daily update of issues reports of Osmose and Neis I'm reviewing daily, latter running at about 11:00 AM, to include someone supposedly removed 4x oneway on rotondas when the history shows I removed the very tags 4 days before. Strikes me as lots of double effort going on and people running with stale data.
cheers
Reinhard12 (2020-12-09 20:30:42+00:00): Hi, I didn't want to criticise your work, just correct this typo. I found it with this tool: http://osm.janmichel.eu/taginfo/newkeys.htm
 Greetings
Reinhard
SekeRob (2020-12-10 09:26:14+00:00): Thx for the link where lenes_forward, and networ caught my eye on the latest very much global looking report, but I'm resisting. My goal is to just clean up my province with occasional spillover and keep clean. taginfo I use to check the frequency of use and 1 sure does set a red flag, Like the text on top though, Middle of night half of Europe got notified of someone removing deprecated amenity=picnic_table. Did the person really do that, when there is leisure=picnic_table used 147,000 times?
Have a good day.
eggie (2020-12-09 10:34:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Prima initiatief  om de kaart te verbeteren. geef wel aan wat je precies hebt gedaan.
Gebouwen in OSM worden niet zelf ingetekend, maar periodiek geïmporteerd. Je kunt dat versnellen door een verzoek te doen op forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Verder niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dit geeft vaak schade. 
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-12-09 10:37:37+00:00): Wanner een weg door water loopt zal er toch een brug zijn of heeft de sloot een duiker. Kijk nog eens naar je toegangsweg.
eggie (2020-12-09 10:57:42+00:00): Bruggetje toegevoegd
ThomR (2020-12-10 15:32:07+00:00): Bonjour, 
Concernant les pompes funèbres, la description du tag adéquat est ici : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors
Pour les presbytères, dans cette page : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
il est indiqué de le marquer office=religion +religion=christian + denomination=*
Dimacn (2020-12-10 06:57:56+00:00): В названии пишите только Respect, без "обувной магазин". В тег name вносится только имя собственное, без характеристик и описаний - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
Katyyyyyyyyyyyyyya2 (2020-12-15 16:52:58+00:00): Эй, вы можете дать правильный набор изменений, что это за добавленный односторонний тег для университета ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95543472
Wudang (2020-12-15 23:56:32+00:00): Hello! Thanks for reaching out. I added oneway tags to a few service roads in the university parking lot since you can see arrows in Bing imagery. I did not add a oneway tag to the university itself. I hope this clears up any confusion! 

Automatic Translation:
Здравствуйте! Я добавил односторонние метки к нескольким служебным дорогам на парковке университета, поскольку на изображениях Bing вы можете видеть стрелки. Я не добавлял односторонний тег к самому университету. Надеюсь, это устранит путаницу!
TravGW (2020-12-09 15:12:37+00:00): I noticed you changed a service road to a track. You’re not entirely wrong. The wiki for highway=track does say, “This tag represents roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc.; often unpaved (unsealed) but may apply to paved tracks as well, that are suitable for two-track vehicles, such as tractors or jeeps.” However it also says, “Roads which provide access to a specific property, such as residential driveways or industrial access roads, should be tagged highway=service or a higher road class.” Based on this latter statement I have been tagging roads which lead to oil wells, storage tanks, other industrial locations as driveways (highway=service, service=driveway, access=private) or at the very least just a service road.
avssr (2020-12-10 09:42:14+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for reviewing the edit and the information about the area. I've made the necessary changes according to your information under changeset(#95605003). We have already informed our editors regarding this issue, we will make sure this won't happen again. Please let us know in case of issues/concerns with our edits we will fix them earliest.
Regards,
avssr.
gallseife (2020-12-10 12:08:14+00:00): Das name= tag ist nicht für Nummerierungen oder Beschreibungen gedacht. Dafür solltest du zb ref= oder description= verwenden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
Deine ausführliche Wiegand Glas Aufteilung solltest du darum noch einmal überarbeiten.
eggie (2020-12-09 10:29:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-12-09 11:01:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Probeer indien mogelijk op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. 
Geen spatie in de postcode is de juiste format. 
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-12-09 14:45:37+00:00): Wouter.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de officiële adresnode. Die lagen op een hoopje.. Nu niet meer.
Wellicht dat amenity=school niet de huiste tagging is. (meer voor basisschool t/m VO)
Kijk eens hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:religion%3Dbuddhist

MVG,
eggie
user_2066394 (2020-12-09 16:41:46+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
MMKouril (2020-12-25 14:07:55+00:00): As a result of this change, "Doupovská dráha" has completely disappeared from the Openrailway maps. :-( I recommend using this combination of 3 tags "railway=rail", "usage=branch" and "railway: preserved = yes" instead of the "railway = preserved" tag. See
MMKouril (2020-12-25 14:08:26+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:railway=preserved?uselang=cs
Heinz_V (2020-12-11 07:11:59+00:00): You destroyed with your edits about 10 boundary relations. I made corrections.
mueschel (2020-12-10 11:35:02+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "ref_day"? Das Tag gibt es sonst nirgends. Leerungszeiten können mit "collection_times" erfasst werden.

Gruß
Jan
hauke-stieler (2020-12-09 11:37:22+00:00): Hab zu schnell auf OK geklickt. Weitere Quelle war Mapillary.
GinaroZ (2020-12-10 23:03:28+00:00): Hi, does this road connect to the other one via a path? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6934989773
Aznod (2020-12-12 17:12:41+00:00): Went back and had a better look, there is a path off to the side but where the road ends its just a patch of dirt thats blocked off with a barrier and no entry signs.
map per (2021-01-12 21:20:04+00:00): Hallo leonifend,

du hast vermutlich ausversehen die Bergwerksstraße mit Gleisen nahe dem Bahnhof verbunden. Ich werd den Fehler gleich ausbessern.

Viele Grüße
map per
user_5359 (2020-12-09 14:51:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/882769553: Did you mean layer=1 or levl=1?
Mahdi Nameghi (2021-01-05 11:45:57+00:00): کاربر گرامی
اینجا نقشه اپن استریت مپ است. کاملا با نقشه ویز متفاوت می باشد. نیازی به زدن این ریلیشنها نیست. لطفا مطابق ویز نقشه را ادیت نکنید.
Miguel Pedr (2020-12-29 03:42:07+00:00): Hola,
¿Existe una razón específica para agregar la dirección y eliminar las direcciones nuevamente? Antes, la dirección agregada para la carretera es correcta, pero nuevamente después de unos días ha eliminado las direcciones de las carreteras. ¿Existe una razón específica para agregar y eliminar las instrucciones nuevamente?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95552596
tangomapper (2021-01-06 18:24:48+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for reaching out and adding these one ways. I previously removed them after a second review, because the arrows in imagery seemed too blurry for me to be fully confident that these directions are accurate.
Traducción:
Hola Miguel Pedr, Gracias por comunicarte y agregar estas formas únicas. Los eliminé previamente después de una segunda revisión, porque las flechas en las imágenes parecían demasiado borrosas para estar completamente seguro de que estas direcciones son precisas.
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-10 20:09:43+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95639303

comment: removed test data
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
tastrax (2020-12-16 09:02:01+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Dave Venables (2020-12-09 19:54:32+00:00): Both shops show on maps
user_2066394 (2020-12-09 20:24:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/602765940
description=Kindergarten ?

Der Kindergarten ist auf dem Gebäude mit amenity=kindergarten erfasst.
Yunkers (2021-05-11 14:18:26+00:00): Pododawałeś nieistniejące budynki, niektóre na środku drogi. Już posprzątałem, więc to czysto informacyjnie.
Johnwhelan (2020-12-27 00:35:43+00:00): Highway=residential rather than alley perhaps?
os-emmer (2024-03-07 18:12:53+00:00): Hi Guilherme,
I have some questions about an object you edited. Can you maybe have a look?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4143352
Reeniz (2020-12-09 13:37:39+00:00): Es natural=tree no wood
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95555617
felipeeugenio (2020-12-09 13:50:43+00:00): lo hice en dos ediciones
Reeniz (2020-12-09 13:58:42+00:00): Buena
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95555617
Strubbl (2022-04-27 17:36:27+00:00): Hi redweizn, ich habe deine foot und bicycle von no auf use_sidepath gesetzt, da dort ja keine Verbotsschilder stehen und das wohl die eigentliche Intention deines CS war, oder?

Viele Grüße
Sven
redweizn (2022-04-27 17:41:27+00:00): Danke und viele Grüße Daniel
DaveF (2020-12-11 00:18:27+00:00): Hi
As the station is open, proposed:station is the correct tag
Vinber-Pro (2020-12-09 15:22:20+00:00): Bonjour,
vous semblez avoir ajouté les magasins à la ferme directement sur un ou des batiments.
Pas de souci si le batiment est bien utilisé que pour cela, sinon préférez un point que vous qualifiez de shop=farm :)
Bonne cartographie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95556899
eggie (2020-12-09 14:29:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.. Probeer als het even kan direct op je officiële adresnode bij te taggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-12-09 14:35:17+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode