piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
emersonveenstra (2022-11-17 12:48:42+00:00): Hi,

You appear to have deleted a driveway that exists on aerial imagery, was that intentional?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128905850
Geofreund1 (2023-12-09 16:30:39+00:00): Hallo Herrenälber,
heißt der Weg Plotzsägmühlstraße oder Plotzsägemühlstraße?

Gruß
Geofreund1
Herrenälber (2023-12-10 15:09:08+00:00): Hi Geofreund1,
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe den Weg nun durchgehend mit "Plotzsägmühlweg" benannt. Es kommt aber ab und an bei den Waldwegen vor, dass sich einzelne Schilder hinsichtlich solcher Details widersprechen.

Gruß
Herrenalber
klysium (2022-11-15 01:17:10+00:00): The former 247 building was destroyed, a new one was created called the Carnegie Building that opened in November 2019. The parking areas were redesigned but are only for residents.
Wookey (2023-09-04 23:00:02+00:00): Your edit to add 'gas topology' in southern Cambridge has resulted in most/much/all of the gas network being in the map twice. Once as the actual pipelines and once as a more approximate 'gas topology' network, often with the pipelines routed in places they do not exist.
I'd like to resolve this but I'm not sure how to proceed. Where did this topological information come from? It may add useful information where the pipelines connectivity is not otherwise known? Is there any reason why I should not remove it, at least in the area from Cherry Hinton to Addenbrookes where I am pretty certain that the existing  pipeline routing is correct.
kesterlester (2023-09-05 08:34:28+00:00): Hi, happy to have a long chat about this.  There is a good reason for all of this and need for both.  Where are you based?  Much easier to chat in person than over text. Are you local?
kesterlester (2023-09-05 08:35:20+00:00): [ I should qualify "local". I meant "Local to / near Cambridge. ]
Wookey (2023-09-05 13:39:13+00:00): es I am based in Cambridge. A chat would be good. 
I suggest https://jitsi.debian.social/kesterlesternwookey (but I think that requires you to have a salsa login which you probably don't have unless you happen also to be a debian contributor - try it - can you just click on that URL and get a video call or not?. 
If not use https://meet.jit.si/kesterlesternwookey works for everyone 

I'm busy for the rest of today but anytime
wed after 1pm (till about 3am) would work.
Or thur. Then I'm away for a week walking. 

I also just (yesterday!) joined #osm-infrastructure matrix channel 
which is intended for discussing this stuff
https://matrix.to/#/!CJjtKctuARcgdacUzh:matrix.org?via=matrix.org&via=one.ems.host&via=nobelium.no
sadly the 'make a call' functionality is disabled there, but once on
matrix you can just click to call me personally, audio or video.
kesterlester (2023-09-05 13:50:57+00:00): I just tried the debian social link to check whether it would demand I have credentials I don't. It seemed to connect fine so I presume it would work fine tomorrow too (unless its single use ...).

I'll select 2pm Weds from your preferred range, if that's OK.  So I'll contact you then.  Or if something comes up before then to push things back, I'll send a note here. I'll use the debian link first, and the jit one as a fallback.
kesterlester (2023-09-05 14:11:12+00:00): ( P.S. I would be happy to provide a proper lunch at Peterhouse at 1pm if you were to prefer in-person alternative to virtual meetings. Or I could cycle from college to ARM or the Tech Park or wherever you might be based if it has a good canteen. But unless you request either of these I will stick with 2pm virtual. )
Wookey (2023-09-05 16:25:38+00:00): AH yes. In-person hadn't occurred to me (I hadn't realised you were in Cambridge too). The weather is nice so that sounds like a good plan. I've actually got to be in Histon for an annual medical check-up at 12:30. I think that will take 1.5 hours or so but it's also a bit uncertain so actually I should be coming back through town around 2pm-2:30pm. Would coming to find you in Peterhouse be a good plan then? Lunch would be nice but it might be a bit late for that in which case we can presumably find somewhere to chat anyway?
kesterlester (2023-09-05 17:03:19+00:00): Lunch is served 12:45pm to 1:30pm (though people might carry on eating/chatting til 1:45pm) so I can't provide lunch if you were to arrive much after 1pm (or 1:15pm latest). But I would work in Peterhouse in my office there for the rest of the afternoon, and so we could easily chat in my office in person.  The porters could direct you to "E1".
kesterlester (2023-09-05 17:03:56+00:00): So, yes, 2pm or 2:30pm would be fine for a lunchless in-person chat.
Wookey (2023-09-05 22:57:12+00:00): OK. I'll try and find you there when I come by. 
Am I looking for Dr Christopher Lester?
kesterlester (2023-09-06 07:19:16+00:00): yes, but the room is E1
Wookey (2023-09-06 12:30:59+00:00): I've been told this test takes more like 3 hours than 1.5, so I'll be there later. maybe 3:30-4?
kesterlester (2023-09-06 12:33:24+00:00): I will be (or expect to be) in Peterhouse until 5pm.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-11-17 15:20:27+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution, but buildings should not overlap each other. If there is no 21/1 building anymore, then it should be deleted.
blacx (2022-11-16 05:53:04+00:00): Cuidado con seguir las recomendaciones del ID a ciegas, has etiquetado varias linieas de tren como tranvia de cadiz
MxxCon (2022-11-17 18:08:19+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? The feature that you tagged as horizontal bar on satellite imagery appears to be the batting cage of this baseball field. Is that not accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128907199
Berlin53 (2022-11-15 10:24:51+00:00): Und wieder ist eine Brücke gemappt, die es so nicht mehr gibt. Außerdem: im Bereich der "Johannisthaler Gleislinse" gibt keine Gleise, die disused sind. Das ist Stadtentwicklungssystem und die Gleise warten nur noch auf ihren Abriss. Lass es doch bitte sein, in unscharfe Luftbilder irgendetwas hineinzuinterpretieren, was du nicht 100%ig weisst.
streckenkundler (2022-11-14 20:37:57+00:00): ich schenke noch ein "keine" und ein "n"

Also...  ..."da keine sinnvollen Daten"...

Eifer des Gefechts... Hmpf

Rest egal...
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 12:26:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10184258964/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
Jakka (2025-05-14 16:11:02+00:00): On these subdivisions, addresses of future houses are very necessary so that suppliers of building materials know how to find them.
Some have already been built and occupied
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 13:14:13+00:00): I guess that building=proposed is less problematic on nodes, though maybe lifecycle prefix like proposed:building=yes would make sense here
eggie (2022-11-14 21:18:56+00:00): Dag Telekijker,
Da's een lastige..  Wanneer je een opmerking wil plaatsen voor andere mappers kun het beste note=  gebruiken ipv description.
Dan is het even de vraag hoelang gaat dit duren.
Wanneer het vele maanden gaat duren dan kun je zo'n wegdeel op highway=construction zetten.
Gaat de brug binnen afzienbaren tijd weer open dan taggen we zoiets met conditionaltagging.
Even zomaar een voorbeeld.. 
access:conditional=no @ (2021 Jan 20-2021 Apr 3) 

Routers kunnen er dan rekening meehouden.
Komt de brug binnenkort weer terug dan hoef je niets te doen.
Er lopen overigens twee wandelroutes en een fietsroute hier.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-15 09:29:21+00:00): Zet bij de note= ook even de startdatum en einddatum van de 'werken' anders blijft deze opmerking ergens in de mist van de tijd hangen.
Telekijker (2022-12-01 17:44:02+00:00): Als dat het geval is laat ik het even aan de routebeheerders over. Er staat geen informatie anders dan gesloten of zelfs niets Je komt het terrein aan de zuidkant in en wil eraan de noordkant uit. Logischerwijze is het wachten op veel vorst dan is de bodem draagkrachtig in Waterland.
eggie (2022-12-01 18:27:36+00:00): Zal nog eens zoeken of er iets geplubliceerd is... anders blijft het inderdaad wachten op ijs.
eggie (2022-12-02 09:23:16+00:00): https://www.noordhollandsdagblad.nl/cnt/dmf20210723_14094709?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic

Als het goed is had die brug al terug moeten zijn?

Wellicht was er meer aan de hand?

Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-12-02 09:27:21+00:00): https://www.oostzaan.nl/mozard/!suite86.scherm0325?mPag=664

De brug zou weer open zijn sinds 18 nov. 
Oorzaak vertraging in voorjaar wegens broedende duiven.
kuhni74 (2022-11-21 18:01:48+00:00): wo kommt dieser Name her?
kuhni74 (2022-11-21 18:04:04+00:00): Höhe wäre laut Laserscan 477m
Bergfan (2022-11-22 09:55:18+00:00): Im Wienerwaldatlas von Freytag&Berndt aus 1967 (basierend auf der Österreichischen Karte von etwa 1960) ist die Erhebung mit Medau bezeichnet. Habe "höhe" ergänzt, da es in OSM schon im Tal weiter unten den Flur-/Hofnamen Medau gab. Bin mir aber nicht 100 %ig sicher, dass das die beste Lösung ist. Habe überhaupt nichts dagegen, wenn man dies ändert. Der Gipfel war jedenfalls relativ markant für diese Gegend. Danke für die Ergänzung der Höhe! :)
kuhni74 (2022-11-22 16:38:31+00:00): Die Medau (Mettau, Mittau,...) ist die Wiese beim Vöslauergraben, ehe dieser nach S umbiegt (Im Atlas ist das halt redaktionell nach N gerutscht). Die erste Silbe "Med" ist wohl nicht ganz klar (muss nicht mit "Mitte" zu tun haben), aber die zweite Silbe "Au" bezeichnet sicher eine tiefgelegene Wiese am Bach und keinen Berg. Natürlich könnte man den Gipfel Medauhöhe nennen, aber ich denke nicht, dass wir hier neue Namen erfinden sollen, sondern bestehende (auch wenn sie im Einzelfall vielleicht unpubliziertes Lokalwissen darstellen) abbilden.
Bergfan (2022-11-24 13:36:56+00:00): Ok. Ja, das ist nachvollziehbar. Habe den Gipfelnamen gelöscht.
kuhni74 (2022-11-24 15:11:40+00:00): Merci
kuhni74 (2022-11-24 15:16:12+00:00): Falls für diesen Berg hier ein Name auffindbar wäre, wär's cool: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3432100
3LIGMT2RZ8 (2022-11-14 21:18:43+00:00): Gracias
HurricaneGator (2022-11-15 14:58:13+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-10-02.
ma-rt-in (2022-11-15 18:16:50+00:00): Hallo,

ein kleiner Tipp von mir: An der Kreuzung K38/K39 hattest du die Abbiegespur nach Speicher sehr lange nach hinten gezogen, das ist aber nicht nötig und nicht sinnhaft. Sondern die das Abbiegen wird erst gemappt, wo man rechtlich gesehen nicht mehr abbiegen darf, also die Markierung durch geht. Ich habe die ganze Kreuzung nun angepasst.

vg
Mazda05 (2022-11-15 11:26:43+00:00): Добрый день. Для каких целей или на основании чего вы изменили класс дорог highway=* на highway=service в пунктах пропуска и между ними? Обсуждалось ли это в сообществе или это было согласовано с сообществом? Если вы хотели разметить текущую легальность доступа к этим дорогам, то имеется соответствующий распространённый https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access в значении access=no. Если хотели разметить не доступ к дорогам — прошу пояснить, что именно было размечено. Прошу учесть, что факт военных действий и текущее техническое состояние дорог, в том числе их разрушение и попадание по ним мин, ракет и артснарядов, согласно действующих локальных соглашений, размещённых на https://wiki.openstreetmap.org, не меняет класс дорог. Более того highway=service, согласно текущим локальным соглашениям, используется исключительно для проездов и/или подъездных дорог, что не соответствует данным объектам на текущий момент
Jay May (2022-11-15 14:19:14+00:00): Oh, O.K. So you mean it was sufficient for me to add the "access=no" tag?
Mazda05 (2022-11-16 16:50:08+00:00): If you wanted to mark only the legal permissions/restrictions, then — access=* without changing highway=*
Jay May (2022-11-17 08:12:42+00:00): I see. In reality, I changed the highway tag because some people (as myself) plan their trips also "visually". It is a way of marking clearly, that currently it is not possible to travel that way and not to even try. Especially given the fact some of these roads are destroyed.
I am wondering if we shouldn't mark temporarily those border checkpoints as "landuse=military"
Mazda05 (2022-11-19 14:51:50+00:00): «I am wondering if we shouldn't mark temporarily those border checkpoints as "landuse=military"» No, in Ukraine: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war. Perhaps in Russia and in Belarus
Mazda05 (2022-11-19 14:55:41+00:00): «I see. In reality, I changed the highway tag because some people (as myself) plan their trips also "visually". It is a way of marking clearly, that currently it is not possible to travel that way and not to even try. Especially given the fact some of these roads are destroyed.» This does not match the description of highway=* and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer. I ask you to revert the values of hignway=* at border control checkpoints and between them
Mazda05 (2022-11-19 14:55:57+00:00): «I see. In reality, I changed the highway tag because some people (as myself) plan their trips also "visually". It is a way of marking clearly, that currently it is not possible to travel that way and not to even try. Especially given the fact some of these roads are destroyed.» This does not match the description of highway=* and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer. I ask you to revert the values of highway=* at border control checkpoints and between them
ivanbranco (2022-11-15 20:22:38+00:00): Hi vindard,

is this import documented? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
snoozingnewt (2022-11-15 21:49:13+00:00): It seems to be mostly a survey with a few errant ones and not an import - this is why more descriptive changeset comments/smaller bounding box size is needed.
ivanbranco (2022-11-15 22:10:41+00:00): Hi snoozingnewt,

how can this be a survey? It's 565 nodes with "survey:date=2022-11-14" added in south america, south africa, netherland, turkey and... the ocean ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10184351460 )?
Igor Bubelov (2022-11-16 04:54:21+00:00): I think it's related to this issue: https://github.com/GaloyMoney/galoy/discussions/1781

In my view, those things shouldn't be automated and all those changes should be reverted. Adding merchants with no address, amenity, working hours and contact info doesn't make much sense.
ovruni (2022-11-16 06:04:53+00:00): I also think similarly. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct . For now I have removed the data in Peru and also reverted the similar changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128966060
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-16 09:20:24+00:00): reverted remains in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128979096 as blatant violation of OSM rules
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-16 09:29:27+00:00): If any “Shadowy Supertaggers”  (really? that is self-selected name?) are reading this: please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Matija Nalis (2022-11-16 13:06:36+00:00): related discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/shadowy-supertaggers/5543
nathan_day (2022-11-16 14:25:20+00:00): Hi,

Nathan here from BTCMap.org.

This was clearly not thought through enough and doesn't meet the OSM guidelines.

We're now working with Galoy on a better process going forward and will consult with you. We prefer manual, verified edits of course.

I'll respond more generally on the the main thread shortly:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/shadowy-supertaggers/5543

Thanks,

Nathan
Co-founder
BTCMap.org
Msiipola (2022-11-27 17:27:51+00:00): Här är det typ track på vägar till vindkraftverk. Men dessa vägar är ju servicevägar till kraftverken. Och inte "vanliga" skogsvägar.
AndersAndersson (2022-11-27 22:16:54+00:00): Både track och service funkar väl.
En track som leder till någons jaktkoja känns ganska normalt då det inte är en genomfart till något speciellt. Precis samma som vindkraftverk. Inget av objekten är någon publikmagnet. Track med tracktype=grade1 kan vara väldigt fina vägar.
AndersAndersson (2022-11-27 22:17:10+00:00): Vill du ändra så gör det.
elot360 (2023-01-12 15:07:42+00:00): Wiesz może czy te route_mastery można zebrać do jeszcze większej kupy, żeby dało się jakoś łatwo wejść do listy wszystkich linii tramwajowych u nas?
dzamper (2023-01-12 15:32:26+00:00): Czy to jest łatwo to zależy ale overpassem na pewno da się wyciągnąć
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1q4d
Do JOSM-a też można to wrzucić i pobierze relacje bez problemu
opendcc (2022-11-14 21:47:24+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Es gibt da ein kleines Problem: der Name eines Objekts bezeichnet nur den Eigennamen, nicht die Eigenschaft. Eine Streuobstwiese wird als solche getagged, das wird aber nicht hingeschrieben. Bei einer Straße steht auch nicht 'Asphaltstraße', sondern nur der Eigenname, sofern vorhanden. Ich habe daher name-tagging und doppelte Tags wieder entfernt.

Servus 

Wolfgang
tastrax (2022-12-09 12:30:57+00:00): I have just corrected many of these features that were 'named' incorrectly. Check out the wiki for golf courses and you will save yourself heaps of time. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
qstep (2026-03-19 20:40:26+00:00): Ez a kettő kimaradt anno, de én nem merek nekiállni megrajzolni :)

Budapest-Déli Református Egyházmegye
Budapest-Északi Református Egyházmegye
GBAB (2026-03-22 10:17:07+00:00): Azt hiszem, az volt a gond, hogy nem igazán egyértelmű a két budapesti egyházmegye közös határa.

Ha van valami jó minőségű térképed róla vagy egy pontos leírásod, szívesen fölrajzolom őket.
qstep (2026-04-20 09:32:59+00:00): Írtam az egyháznak, azt ígérték hamarosan válaszolnak a pontos adatokkal.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-08 11:44:19+00:00): Please don't vandalize the roads by changing them to paths.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Reinhard12 (2022-11-27 19:49:52+00:00): Hallo Schorsch_Ger,
was bedeutet verbindungsstraße = 3? highway = service fehlt jetzt, dadurch wird der Weg auf keiner Karte dargestellt.
Außerdem sollte ein Poller als Punkt auf dem Weg erfasst werden, nicht als Eigenschaft des Wegs.
Gruß Reinhard
Schorsch_Ger (2022-11-28 08:49:02+00:00): Hallo Reinhard,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Da ich des englischen nicht so mächtig bin, sind manche Bezeichnungen für mich ein Buch mit sieben Siegeln.
Sie dir bitte die Straße auf Google Maps mal an, da siehst du, dass links und rechts die Straße durch zwei Gitter gesperrt ist. Ein Benutzung ist mit Fahrzeugen nicht möglich, Fußgänger und Radfahrer können durch.
Es wäre schön, wenn du die richtige Einstufung vornehmen könntest, dann würde ich das in Zukunft richtig machen.
Viele Grüße
Schorsch
Reinhard12 (2022-11-28 16:53:45+00:00): Hallo Schorsch,
die Änderungen am Weg habe ich rückgängig gemacht und stattdessen einen Punkt "barrier=cycle_barrier" auf den Weg gesetzt. "motorcar=no" schließt mehrspurige Kfz aus.
Viele Grüße
Reinhard
eggie (2022-11-15 07:21:44+00:00): Dag Tksic

Je vraagt feedback. Dit is wat je hebt gedaan.
Je hebt een aantal adresnodes gecombineerd (nummers en postcodes) en sommige verwijderd. Dat lijkt me niet correct.

Klik op de verschillende adresnodes  dan zie je wat ik bedoel. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128910792

Zou je dit willen herstellen?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-15 07:28:25+00:00): reverted by changeset #128922629

Er was hier zoveel verkeerd gegaan dat ik de changeset heb teruggedraaid.
Wanneer bedrijven berdwijnen blijft de adresnode intact. Dan alleen de bedrijfsinfo verwijderen en op de nieuw adresnode het bedrijf weer bijtaggen.
Voorzichtig schuiven met de adresnodes en niet combineren. Dat kan nooit kloppen.
Succes,
eggie
eggie (2022-11-15 07:58:35+00:00): Tip  Gebruik de linker alttoets erbij als je schuift. Dan plakken de de adresnodes niet aan elkaar.
eggie (2022-11-15 08:21:20+00:00): Beste Tksic..
Ik heb een BAGupdate gevraagd van het vernieuwde winkelcentrum. Dat maakt het straks makkelijker om de boel aan te passen.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/217

MVG
eggie
emersonveenstra (2022-11-21 21:31:32+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contributions! Please make sure to have good changeset comments so others know what you did. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128911329
EL81PKUDCD (2023-05-21 22:55:25+00:00): ¡Seguro! Lo corregiré.
Illio (2022-11-17 11:16:32+00:00): Zrejme omylom ste odstránili aj Dom techniky (Lidl + ďalšie prevádzky), ktorý je stále na mieste a neplánuje sa búrať.
aceman444 (2022-11-17 21:31:11+00:00): Veru, zostalo to ako building:part=yes (cize neoznacil som to ako zdemolovane) ale to sa zatial nerenderuje. Pritom to ma samostatne supisne cislo. Opravim. Dakujem za postreh.
muralito (2022-11-15 23:12:07+00:00): Hi. What is the source for this change?
rowcherryrow (2022-11-17 20:54:52+00:00): Thank you for reaching out and asking. The cited sources are Esri World Imagery and Mapillary 
(https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=132066865633241), where I see bidirectional arrows on the street sign for the highway in question. Edits were made based on how to model a dual carriageway in OSM policy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway).
muralito (2022-11-19 16:51:43+00:00): OK. Mapillary imagery is 6 years old. I was there around 2020 and both ways had the same direction, as it was before this changeset.

Please verify the freshness of your sources in next changesets (in particular, if the last change of the element is newer than your source).

Thanks.
rowcherryrow (2022-11-28 19:08:21+00:00): Thank you for your insight. I can return the oneway to how it previously was based on your local knowledge.
julcnx (2022-11-15 05:04:20+00:00): hi Kristjan, does the cafe not exist anymore? If so, shouldn't it be deleted?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128911932
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2022-11-15 07:19:42+00:00): Hi cmoffroad :-)

According to my research, this cafe is permanently closed. Closed locations should not be deleted from OSM, they are tagged with disused.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
ovruni (2022-11-15 05:02:40+00:00): Hola CesarEduardo, el uso de la etiqueta de leisure=pitch en las canchas de juego se encuentra destinado para las áreas donde se juega el deporte, no para la instalación.
Saludos
ovruni (2022-11-15 05:04:22+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
Tom Brennan (2025-03-05 08:53:26+00:00): Do you have a source for the name for "Elevenses Gully"?
bertboy (2025-03-05 09:41:17+00:00): Just a name given to it by a small group of walkers in the 1970s I think. So its similar to many canyon names, but less interesting and less visited (and so less used or known).
gscscnd (2022-11-15 08:51:10+00:00): Jest OK, ale do aktualizacji byłyby chyba również adresy budynków? Np. według warstwy Krajowa Integracja Numeracji Adresowej w miejscu budynku Długa 17C (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206697320) jest numer 12, przypuszczalnie już dla nowej nazwy ulicy.
gscscnd (2022-11-15 08:51:49+00:00): Tak jak w poprzednim przypadku:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128912152#c945273
gscscnd (2022-11-15 08:54:21+00:00): Zawsze dodawaj maxspeed:type i/lub source:maxspeed.
gscholz (2022-11-16 08:38:34+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
kechan (2022-11-14 23:27:01+00:00): this should say "added residential areas" forgot that.