piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tomas Straupis (2016-09-21 07:26:16+00:00): Polish names should be added to name:pl tag and not combined with lithuanian one in name tag :-)
Tomas Straupis (2016-09-21 07:43:10+00:00): Population is specified using Lithuanias 2011 census. Reverting population value to the previous one.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-23 22:02:02+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Are these "shelters" perhaps actually churches?  If so, please do edit them so that they are - you'll find the web editor at openstreetmap.org will let you do that.
Best Regards,
Andy
santamariense (2016-09-20 21:26:31+00:00): Use apenas iniciais em maiúscula.
Todas as letras em maiúscula dá  a entender que você tá gritando. Melhor seria então: "Banco do Brasil".
ENTENDEU? QUALQUER DÚVIDA TÊMO AÊ. rsrsrrsrs
BladeTC (2016-09-22 20:41:36+00:00): O Correto é colocar o nome da Agencia, se tiver, e colocar o nome do Banco com a tag "operator".
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-03 08:59:32+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=arabo
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3524011509/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=arab
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
mueschel (2016-09-22 20:04:28+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "ins_in:state=Golestan" 62 times. Note the misspelled key. Could you have a look and correct it?
Cheers, Jan
kesler (2016-09-23 20:04:08+00:00): Hi Jan,
Oh yes. Excuse me it's my fault But I'm wonder why JOSM had no error message for this misspelled tag? I fixed my mistake at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42386228

Thanks for your attention and notifying this mistake.
Happy mapping...
user_5359 (2016-09-21 04:09:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: Move the node to the right building.
user_5359 (2016-09-21 04:08:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database.  A lake with house number??
Ghostofthefallen (2016-09-21 06:30:58+00:00): Hmmm, I thought I deleted it.  Taking care of it.
EneaSuper (2016-09-22 12:35:01+00:00): Davvero un ottimo lavoro, ma converrebbe revisionare la tipologia delle strade per rendere il tutto graficamente più uniforme e comprensibile. Inoltre, mi pare strano che Via dei Carroz abbia una carreggiata non terziaria, e che non lo sia la rotatoria stessa...!
CloCkWeRX (2016-11-11 02:39:28+00:00): Do you know if the road works have started or similar? There's no GPS traces via http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=Bing&id=w194715172&map=18.38/-0.55229/51.90851 yet, so I'm assuming its very early days
Allen616 (2016-09-20 19:28:23+00:00): I made this addition to the wrong changeset. Sorry.
Allen616 (2016-09-20 19:28:04+00:00): I made this addition to the wrong changeset. Sorry.
Allen616 (2016-09-20 19:26:06+00:00): I made this addition to the wrong changeset. Sorry.
Allen616 (2016-09-20 19:26:24+00:00): I made this addition to the wrong changeset. Sorry.
Allen616 (2016-09-20 19:27:11+00:00): I made this addition to the wrong changeset. Sorry.
Allen616 (2016-09-20 19:25:44+00:00): I made this addition to the wrong changeset. Sorry.
maraf24 (2016-10-01 16:37:24+00:00): Niewątpliwie jest to dom.
Aleks-Berlin (2016-09-21 08:39:24+00:00): please follow the wiki-guidelines: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
 wikipedia="lang:Article Title Name" . 
This helps processing/using the data. Thanks, Alex
mavl (2016-09-22 02:34:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавили необычный номер дома [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393216542/history]. Сообщите, пожалуйста, каким источником вы пользуетесь?
user_5359 (2016-09-21 04:04:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Please add address, website and office type. If you need help: You are welcome!
rogerwilco104 (2016-09-21 13:47:20+00:00): 5359, Thank you for your informative comments.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-20 20:23:41+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42263645 and https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/52108/reverting-a-very-large-changeset for the context of this.
jc86035 (2016-09-21 10:48:11+00:00): Thanks :)
dudka (2016-09-21 10:31:24+00:00): для чого ви створили ще один звязок для Білогірського району? є ж www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6495043
VARVAR8 (2017-03-29 22:12:13+00:00): На жаль так і не зміг розібратися. Він чомусь не входить в склад області. Думав що створивши новий зв'язок, усе налагодиться... так і не знайшов ніде відповіді, закинув до "кращих часів"
adrianojbr (2016-09-22 01:38:23+00:00): olá, jairo. tudo bem? muito bom o seu trabalho em itapirubá. para ficar melhor, lembro que não se deve colocar nome abreviados no campo name. caso ache importante o nome abreviado, além do name, pode ser usado tb short_name. você pode corrigir? abraço.
jairoabreu (2016-09-22 01:51:05+00:00): Claro, corrijo sim. É só mudar Av. para Avenida?
adrianojbr (2016-09-22 02:07:00+00:00): isso mesmo. não vi mais nada abreviado.
kocio (2016-09-27 04:04:10+00:00): Nie należy dopisywać polskiej nazwy do nazwy lokalnej - w tym wypadku chodzi o Grodno. Polska nazwa jest w name:pl i tylko tam powinna zostać.
Aleks-Berlin (2016-09-21 08:31:18+00:00): please follow the wiki-guidelines:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
wikipedia="lang:Article Title Name" .
This helps processing the data.
elektronisk (2016-09-27 19:56:37+00:00): Hei, Kartverket har ikke tillatt tegning fra FKB-data (ref imagery_used). Dette må reverteres.
elektronisk (2016-09-27 20:15:52+00:00): Mer info om hvilke datasett det er tillatt å kopiere fra: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norwegian_import_sources

Jeg gjør reverteringen av dette changeset, samt #42308586.

Vær bevisst på hva du tegner fra.
user_5359 (2016-09-21 03:53:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your way. I add the necessary tag and connect the way with the other ways.
tyr_asd (2016-09-21 08:38:49+00:00): Hi. Danke für die Infos, aber ist die Sichtbarkeit des Weg wirklich "excellent"? Normalerweise bedeuted das, das er zumindest markiert (incl. Wegweisern) sein müsste, was er meiner Erinnerung nach aber nicht ist, oder?
phantasy_vs_reality (2016-09-21 14:41:30+00:00): Hi, ich bin den Weg gestern bei gutem Wetter und erstem gefallenen Laub gegangen. Er ist zwar schmal, aber durchgängig gut sichtbar, an keiner Stelle muss man sich fragen, wo es weiter geht. Du hast aber völlig recht, der Weg ist nicht markiert. 

Allerdings lautet die Beschreibung für die "trail_visibility: excellent" in der englischsprachigen Wiki auch: "Unambiguous path or markers everywhere" und die Anforderungen: "None, orientation unproblematic, no map required". Im deutschen Wiki steht allgemein: "Der Schlüssel trail_visibility=* (...) beschreibt die Erkennbarkeit eines Wanderweges im Gelände. Er beschreibt nicht, wie gut eine Route ausgeschildert ist."

Ich verstehe das so, dass es in erster Linie auf die Sichtbarkeit des Weges ankommt und nur wenn diese nicht gegeben ist, der Weg durchgehend markiert sein muss. 

Habe aber auch kein Problem die Trail Visibility auf "Good" herunterzusetzen. Nur die bisherige Bewertung "Horrible" finde ich unangemessen.
tyr_asd (2016-09-21 19:32:15+00:00): OK. Du hast schon recht, dass das so im Wiki steht. Ich finde aber, dass man die Skala auch ein wenig in Verhältnis zum "vor-Ort-Standard" in Relation setzen kann bzw. darf: Wenn, wie hier, in der Nähe mehrere Wege abzweigen, und man ohne GPS nie wirklich 100% sicher sein kann, das man nun den richtigen erwischt hat, ist das IMHO keine "exzellente" Sichtbarkeit.

Ich geb dir aber schon recht, dass das "bad" von vorher gar nicht gepasst hat, und dass "good" wahrscheinlich am besten wäre. Ich war so frei und habe es gleich angepasst!
opendcc (2016-09-21 10:14:26+00:00): Hallo,

bitte immer Änderungskommentare mit angeben, das hilft anderen Mappern in Deiner Gegend. Danke.

Wolfgang
Milancer (2016-09-21 11:16:00+00:00): Ale no tak... včera jsem si tam dal buřta, tak vím kde to je  :)
mcepl (2016-09-21 11:59:08+00:00): ??? Takže je to na tom parkovišti?
Milancer (2016-09-21 12:35:25+00:00): Ano, právě tam. Je to takový větší stánek, vypadá že je napevno ale jako budova to nevypadá.
mcepl (2016-09-21 12:39:16+00:00): OK, mlčím, balím.
LivingWithDragons (2016-12-21 14:04:36+00:00): I didn't think there was any building work on the Mount Oswald site yet (besides the oddly empty roads).
If there is, we should map the specific area it covers as landuse=construction, until it is open when it should be landuse=residential. You can see how I have done that to the South section of the site. For now, there is nothing here but some overgrown grass, hence landuse=meadow.
Fellwalker (2016-12-23 12:22:02+00:00): The noise from the builders about a hundred yards away from me belies that!
I'll try to get time to review how you have done it and make some changes.  At present I could probably onlly walk the perimeter fence of the latest area to mark the area as construction.
LivingWithDragons (2016-12-31 12:18:36+00:00): You were right that they've started construction of Phase 2 (Phase 1 almost complete opposite the girls' High School).
I've changed the main area back to a meadow, but using JOSM I made it a multipolygon relation with a hole in the middle. The hole contains a construction area and a residential area. I walked round the fencing for the construction site, even though about 1/3 is still like a meadow inside.

In short: we can now shift the nodes around, to adjust the size of the meadow/construction/residential areas and they will stay relative to each other.
Fellwalker (2016-12-31 16:24:48+00:00): Thanks for doing that.  As a newcomer to OSM editing, I found the idea daunting. JOSM is not easy but when I had a go elsewhere I found it could do things that the in browser  editor could not.  Today I have had a battle getting it to open from Firefox to look at how you have done it - finally sorted.  Ther has just been a document released by Banks for the next phase, which is pushing for even more development than the outline planning agreed.
http://www.banksgroup.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Community-Update-Newsletter-December-2016.pdf
muralito (2016-09-21 00:23:04+00:00): La marca va en "brand", no en "name".
user_242798 (2016-11-29 21:09:04+00:00): 4x Duplicate highways (A15), one having most busroutes, one not having busroutes or only some;
15x Duplicates nodes;
1x Duplicates [man_made=bridge];
tunnel underneath bridge is useless and incorrect.
FIXES by Changeset 44044921.
user_242798 (2016-10-18 12:41:00+00:00): In this Changeset 9 Duplicated ways have been created:
- 4x bridge
- 5x motorway_link
One of the motorway_link version will have routes assigned, one version is missing routes. Please remove the correct highways! Not the highways having routes assigned.
Also:
- 2x Crossing ways
- 2x Mixed type duplicated nodes
- 47x Other duplicated nodes
Do you ever verify your own work?
For instance by OSM Inspector? Osmose? Keep right!
JAAS (2024-04-05 21:33:57+00:00): Hola Jaiblan,

Hace unos años ingresó un camino [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425613296] con el 'name=8014'. Me pregunto si ese es un nombre real o si es otro tipo de identificador de la vía, cómo el `ref` u otro... si fuera tan amable de confirmarme esto, por favor. Mil gracias!

Saludos,
JAAS
user_5359 (2016-10-23 19:04:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop (instead using Building=Shop)
manoharuss (2016-09-21 05:45:54+00:00): Hi Sofm,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping efforts are greatly appreciated. But I observed that you have added a theatre in the Sundarbans. This does not seem reasonable. Do you have a source for this that could be verified? Let me know.

Cheers,
Manohar
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:10:14+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mueschel (2016-09-21 19:23:31+00:00): Please stop editing! This is an island and not a restaurant! Please inform yourself about tagging guidelines, common tags before you make any more changes to the OSM database!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 08:07:30+00:00): Hello!

You used
man_made=Quay
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4410735609/history

Have you maybe meant
man_made=quay
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Maanya (2016-09-26 04:24:40+00:00): Hey Eng Visal,

Your efforts in adding data to OSM is deeply appreciated. However, I happened to stumble upon your edit, where tourism = viewpoint has been added mostly on residential areas. It would be great if you could take a look at this linkhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint. I am reverting this changeset, as this tag generally applies tourism spots that are on a higher elevation. 
Thank you very much.

Regards,
Maanya
user_5359 (2016-10-23 19:02:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check your modifications. You add some keys without any value.
Supaplex (2016-09-21 04:52:25+00:00): 重覆加了而且已經在OpenStreetMap資料庫上了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3100254498
Supaplex (2016-11-27 17:10:50+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-09-21 03:38:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. And Please double check the position of your node: I don't think you live in the middle of a street.
carfog81 (2016-09-28 22:33:28+00:00): Esto es realmente un Refugio de montaña (alpine_hut)?
Adam Franco (2016-09-28 15:00:35+00:00): Hi @neshobe, welcome to Open Street Map! I'm a local contributor from Middlebury and based on your handle I'm guessing you're in the area as well. Thanks for contributing!

I was just reviewing local changes and noticed this change, which seems to accidentally convert a relation that was marking the land-cover of the mountains as trees to a giant meadow. Based on the Change-set comment, my guess is that you were trying to change only the small area that contains the Robert Frost homestead rather than the woods surrounding it.

Please let me know if you have any questions about tagging, relations, or how to fix the map to achieve the result you were going for, I'd be happy to help.

Best,
Adam Franco
Paul_012 (2018-02-26 07:17:43+00:00): This edit has been reverted because it broke the treaty-defined EEZ.
Supaplex (2016-09-21 04:51:25+00:00): Is there a name for the sculpture?
Paul_012 (2018-02-26 07:48:30+00:00): This changeset, along with 42464552, have been reverted because they broke Thailand's maritime boundaries.
Alecs01 (2016-09-21 18:38:05+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, you created a nameless hotel and another named "cvc" near this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2101707168 Are you sure they really exist?
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:08:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Alecs01 (2016-09-23 16:11:22+00:00): Reverted, please do not perform such edits with maps.me; Roma capitale, if any, is the name of the municipality, not the city
user_5359 (2016-09-21 19:29:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the differnece between your changeset comment and your tagging. If this aera is a parking slot, please use amenity=parking.
rasagy (2016-09-22 00:52:01+00:00): What is this area for? And isn’t that the wrong location of Misra Yantra?
TheSwavu (2016-09-21 09:53:50+00:00): These are not lakes rather they are salt pans ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_pan_(geology) )
Polarbear (2016-10-27 16:23:22+00:00): Die Objekte erscheinen mir zweifelhaft, bitte begründen. 

Ein religiöser Laden heisst "Moschee"?
Ein Gedenkstein ist ein memorial, kein monument, und Gedenkstein kein Name, allenfalls eine description. 
Das Jugendgästehaus (Schreibfehler) ist eine Abraumhalde? 
Heisst eine Schule wirklich "Deutsches Haus", was für eine Schule ist das?
Heinz (2016-10-27 21:35:27+00:00): Das waren Einträge vor Ort in der Eile und mit Beschränkten Möglichkeiten von OSMand. Sorry das Überarbeiten ist bis heute nicht erfolgt. Zumindest die angeführten sind korrigiert.
Polarbear (2016-11-25 14:52:38+00:00): Danke für die Korrekturen und die nette Kommunikation zwischendurch :-)
user_5359 (2016-09-21 19:26:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
keithonearth (2016-09-27 17:20:17+00:00): I've reverted this edit, as I have been to the location of the caravan site, and there is not one in this location. Thai language is not appropriate for use in name tags in India. 

While I do not know that the other additions are inaccurate, I do not feel that the edit is reliable.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:08:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:07:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Alecs01 (2016-09-24 13:45:08+00:00): Please consider your edits are visible to anyone, don't spam the map this way, thanks
Hjart (2016-09-21 08:54:25+00:00): Bemærk at importer bør foretages på separate konti
AE35 (2016-09-21 09:08:26+00:00): Var kun enkelt tilfælde - da en fra Danmark Adresser nævnte på Twitter at OSM ikke havde adresser endnu på Vennevej
SomeoneElse (2016-09-23 22:03:24+00:00): Hello,
Is "coffe" spelt correctly here?
Just checking...
Andy
sdonk (2016-10-09 21:11:55+00:00): Ops, it's definitely coffee. Good catch, thanks
Constable (2016-09-21 17:16:55+00:00): hey sir, stop replacing that damn "name=*" with the Chinese name!
poornibadrinath (2016-09-21 09:17:49+00:00): Source: Mapbox Satellite, Strava heat map (Not Bing)
Socks (2016-09-22 13:25:39+00:00): Hi, have you got a source for the bollard having a name? It seems an unusual thing!
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-23 14:53:32+00:00): Hi. The name is way too long, and it includes a website. Use the "website" tag for websites.
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-23 15:01:15+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48919695
user_5359 (2016-10-09 18:07:41+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
rasagy (2016-09-22 00:47:19+00:00): Hey!

Removed this shape incorrectly mapped as a park: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42335868

In case you’re trying to just explore OSM and the iD tool, make sure you don’t save your changes unless they’re actual changes you want on the map. Thanks!
Владимир К (2016-09-22 08:21:48+00:00): точка ворот должна принадлежать линии дороги.
Владимир К (2016-09-22 08:21:12+00:00): это точно не highway=residential, a hw=service+service=driveway
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2020-12-22 07:41:30+00:00): 您好，您的这个修改集中的内容已被撤销，原因是根据您的描述，您使用了来自有版权的商业地图“搜狗地图”的数据。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96239035#map=18/39.99172/116.32770
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2020-12-22 07:41:20+00:00): 您好，您的这个修改集中的内容已被撤销，原因是根据您的描述，您使用了来自有版权的商业地图“搜狗地图”的数据。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96239035#map=18/39.99172/116.32770
msevilla00 (2016-09-21 21:51:59+00:00): Hola Ivan, 

Si el museo es todo el castillo el etiquetado del mismo ha de ir en el área/línea cerrada que lo define y no en un punto adicional.

Así mismo puedes ver cómo etiquetar convenientemente un castillo y si, se da el caso unas ruinas en la wiki: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcastle

Recuerda que hay una lista de correos de la comunidad y una grupo de telegram para dudas rápidas. 


Suerte con las ediciones! ah! y cuidado... esto es altamente adictivo.
IvanHerCaz (2016-09-21 21:59:53+00:00): ¡Buenas msevilla00!
Acabo de hacer la corrección que me has señalado, es bueno saberlo. Me apunto esa página de la wiki que seguro que me vendrá de perlas (estamos organizando una editatón de fortificaciones canarias :P).
Si me envías por privado la lista de correos y el grupo de Telegram te estaré muy agradecido.
¡Tendré cuidado entonces jeje! Muchas gracias por tu ayuda.
user_5359 (2016-09-22 19:01:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
Владимир К (2016-09-22 06:53:54+00:00): ну а кто addr:suburb=Новый город будет добавлять?
literan (2016-09-23 12:22:44+00:00): а вы уверены, что со Щелковского шоссе "из центра" есть съезд на СВХ на юг? нигде об этом не писали, наоборот, на форумах возмущаются, что дорога перекрыта: http://roads.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=20518&p=306574 - и на Яндекс.картах она перекрыта. Если ответа в течение суток не будет, я вашу правку откачу, т.к. вопрос критичный.
neo-plan (2016-09-23 13:32:32+00:00): Там каждый день что-то меняется! Был съезд со Щелковского на Вернисажную. Соответственно, кусок Вернисажной двух двухсторонним. На СВХ я сам не съезжал.