piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
naoliv (2015-09-05 03:53:50+00:00): Teve duplicação de vias (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364568090 com https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364579828 por exemplo) e relações (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5420840 com https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5420586 por exemplo)
Himké (2015-08-07 21:13:58+00:00): I classify this segment of Route 7 as Trunk Road because it hasn't been upgraded yet.
Himké (2015-08-07 21:30:24+00:00): Built to higher standards than the old trunk road, with interchanges and hard shoulders
pacman541 (2015-08-18 19:35:58+00:00): Возможно не стоило совсем удалять узкоколейку? Тег railway=abandoned вполне бы подошел.
Director (2015-08-18 20:02:55+00:00): Так её больше не существует - демонтировали.
pacman541 (2015-08-19 07:30:14+00:00): Но насыпь осталась, вот как тут например: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45763298
Director (2015-08-19 10:20:21+00:00): Согласен. Внёс изменения.
Mike Baggaley (2015-08-10 22:46:32+00:00): Hi, please note South West Coast Path is the name of a route, which is named on the relation, of which the various paths forming the route are members. It should not be used as the name of path segments as it is not the name of the individual paths.
Maddog Battie (2015-08-11 11:43:03+00:00): Hi Mike,
New to this so comments on what I'm doing wrong are welcome.
The reason I'd added the name to the paths was:
A) Because it wasn't showing up on the map and I see this as important. I've modified the section between Portloe and Porthpean as that is what I had a gpx file for. This now currently shows where the South West Coast Path is. The sections either side of this don't and I think they should.

B) I was copying what had been done on the north coast.

Is there somewhere I could look at that describes the correct way of doing the naming? I'm happy to correct what I have done but if it means removing the SWCP name then I would want to ensure that there was an alternative method which caused it to show up on the actual map.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-11 12:42:03+00:00): Personally, I'd use http://waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=12&lat=50.26969&lon=-4.78722&hill=0# for that...
Mike Baggaley (2015-08-11 13:20:14+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Tagging highways with the name of a route is a common mistake, and personally I think a little more in the way of guidelines should be provided to new members. One other common mistake with new members (me included) is not realising that when adding a highway, it needs to correctly join other highways, otherwise any extract to a sat nav cannot route down it.

You may find http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines useful - they describe how to tag a long distance route and give some helpful information on how to tag for the UK. Another useful tool is at http://keepright.ipax.at/ - this highlights certain types of error in the OSM data.

To see the long distance routes, you can use http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/ for paths and http://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/ for cycling. There are also various other routes such as mountain biking and horse riding that you can access.
 
Cheers,
Mike
Thomas8122 (2015-08-08 07:09:06+00:00): Wo hast du den die Weisheit her, die Zebrastreifen umzutaggen? Btw. ich mache das gerade rückgängig.
zimba (2015-08-08 07:17:30+00:00): Hier kannst du den Parking Node rausloeschen, wenn du den parkplatz als flaeche einzeichnest.
maraf24 (2015-08-10 18:57:46+00:00): Nie widzę żadnego opisu.
Robin007 (2015-08-11 12:16:23+00:00): Jest opis: ul. św. Judy Tadeusza.
Tego brakowało.
FellRnr57 (2015-08-12 07:25:50+00:00): While 'Staffordshire Moorlands Walks' isn't a unique name, it is a name used on waymarks on the route itself and on other maps e.g. OS 1:25000.  For theses reasons I still believe the use is valid and useful to map users.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-12 09:19:00+00:00): It's a tricky one - I've always found the OS's inclusion of "Staffordshire Moorland Walks" rather odd (they don't do it with the equivalent "Derwent Valley Walks" in Derbyshire, for example).  There's no suggestion that the indvidual footpaths along which the "Staffordshire Moorland Walks" signs point individually each have that _name_, any more than the individual roads and paths forming the Staffordshire Way do.  You could perhaps argue that it's a "route" - but adding it would cause the whole area around http://waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=13&lat=52.99604&lon=-2.03081&hill=0# to light up with Staffordshire Moorland Walks "route".  For more info, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
FellRnr57 (2015-08-12 10:57:54+00:00): Thanks for the link, though it did not seem to make anything clearer in this particular instance.  I do see the name as the name of a route.  I am not particularly concerned about the inclusion or otherwise of the name.  I do agree that it causes the area - "to light up with Staffordshire Moorland Walks "route"." in a manner that seems inappropriate to the route's status.  In that case you might want to remove the rest of it (if you have not already done so).
SomeoneElse (2015-08-12 11:09:18+00:00): You're more local to the area than me, so if you reckon that "Staffordshire Moorland Walks" are worth mapping as a route I'd go for it.  I did initially try keeping track of SMW signs as I do for e.g. Staffordshire Way ones, but couldn't get any sense of where the route "went".  I did recently fill in a bit of a gap in the Staffordshire Way near there and do a bit more Churnet Way - now that and the Sabrina Way are definitely distinct routes that need tracking down on the ground and adding to OSM :)
naoliv (2015-09-11 01:46:42+00:00): Adilson, porque você está apagando os nós nas intersecções das ruas?
Isso está muito errado e faz com que não seja mais possível navegar pelas vias.
scai (2015-08-08 08:06:57+00:00): Das mit den Drogen sollte doch geheim bleiben :(
Kakaner (2015-08-08 08:09:35+00:00): Hat der Kommentar ernsthaften Hintergrund?
scai (2015-08-08 08:31:27+00:00): Es war eine Anspielung auf "Drogenmarkt"
Kakaner (2015-08-08 08:32:36+00:00): Ja. Drogerien sind Drogenmärkte. Drug store.
scai (2015-08-08 08:37:02+00:00): "Drogerie" nennt man das hierzulande :)
Kakaner (2015-08-08 08:38:42+00:00): Nur eine Frage der Begrifflichkeit.
scai (2015-08-08 08:41:05+00:00): Natürlich, man könnte es auch "Katze" nennen. "Drogenmarkt" finde ich jedenfalls nirgends als Synonym für "Drogerie". Ist aber auch egal, Humor scheint hier gerade etwas unterrepräsentiert zu sein. Wird nicht wieder vorkommen ;)
Nakaner (2015-08-10 22:43:32+00:00): Ja, toll. Jetzt kann man den gar nicht mehr vom Netto mit Scotty unterscheiden. Danke.
Kakaner (2015-08-10 22:45:52+00:00): Geh doch zu deiner Mama nach Hause weinen!
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-08-08 06:15:03+00:00): Спасибо!
carciofo (2015-09-24 16:19:57+00:00): Cordial saludo. Quisiera confirmar que los cambios a los nodos de la Ruta 45 en la glorieta con la Ruta 40 en los que añade decenas de traffic_calming=bump son correctos? No conozco el area, pero me parece extraño que hubiera tantos policias acostados consecutivamente. De ser un error, por favor revierta sus cambios. Gracias de antemano.
juanda097 (2015-09-24 20:41:51+00:00): Lo podéis apreciar en una foto de la zona y no están pintados en el asfalto son reales http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/EzDw9fjcO6US0cJ6Tco-bg/photo
juanda097 (2015-09-24 20:45:07+00:00): además te dejo una guía de mapeo que dejaron en la comunidad, yo tengo que quitar el RN de las carreteras y autopistas que edité.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia
carciofo (2015-09-25 16:45:32+00:00): Gracias por las fotos, juanda097. La verdad no alcanzo a apreciar en ellas rieleve en el asfalto para categorizarlo como un "bump", pero si usted conoce el área eso es lo importante. En caso de no tener relieve, los categorizaría entonces como traffic_calming=rumble_strip. Gracias también por el link a la guía de mapeo en Colombia; la conozco :) Saludos
zimba (2015-08-10 18:24:48+00:00): Hello,

please note that nodes with only a name= tag are rather useless, you should try to find additional tags like amenity= or leisure= (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features) to describe the entity better. The information you provided as name= would be better suited for the addr:street= and addr:housenumber= tags.

regards
GOwin (2015-08-08 09:29:45+00:00): Hi Maris. What do you mean by "indicator=Small Center"?
Kakaner (2015-08-08 07:22:17+00:00): Es sollte aber einheitlich sein.
Kakaner (2015-08-08 07:34:03+00:00): Was ist mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28226387 ?
Thomas8122 (2015-08-08 07:57:10+00:00): Was ist damit?
Kakaner (2015-08-08 07:59:12+00:00): Die dortigen FGÜs sind auch nicht korrekt getagged.
Thomas8122 (2015-08-08 08:19:25+00:00): Die Changesets sind immer so groß von WolleDD, da kann man schonmal was übersehen. Ich versuch das mal zu ändern.
Thomas8122 (2015-08-08 08:23:43+00:00): Done
Kakaner (2015-08-08 08:26:08+00:00): Kannst ja mal eine Overpass-Abfrage fpr crossing=zebra machen. Gibt noch mehr in Dresden.
Thomas8122 (2015-08-08 09:13:10+00:00): So hab ich das gemacht. Die Wege hab ich nicht umgetaggt nur die Punkte.
Endres Pelka (2015-08-10 10:04:08+00:00): Witam nowicjusza! Proszę, nie rób duplikatów. Punkt adresowy "Dytmarów 1c" jest już przecież naniesiony, wystarczy przenieść tagi z niego na obrys budynku. I proszę się stosować do konwencji, nazwę wsi wstawiamy zarówno do "addr:city" jak i "addr:place", nie stosujemy "addr:street". Wystarczy obejrzeć już obecne punkty adresowe, wszystko tam widać.
pancio (2015-08-10 10:09:17+00:00): Hej,

Właściwie to adres został dodany po naniesieniu nowego obiektu.. ze
wzgledu na dodanie boiska zmianie uległy granice terenu zabudowanego -
budynek z numerem 1c został osierocony.. a nastepnie naniesiony jako
nowy obiekt. Oczywiście, postaram się stosować do obowiązującej konwencji.
Kakaner (2015-08-08 11:00:39+00:00): Schön, damit sind jetzt alle FGÜs der Landeshauptstadt Dresden einheitlich getagged und automatisiert abrufbar
GOwin (2015-08-08 09:27:13+00:00): Interesting! How was the food?
prabeshbasnet (2015-08-08 12:10:13+00:00): Indeed! Filling and tasty.
Pekka_R (2015-08-08 09:28:24+00:00): Lastentalon muoto on väärä.
maraf24 (2015-08-10 12:23:51+00:00): You should provide source for your data, at least in changeset comment.
sashmatash (2015-09-28 10:15:47+00:00): Hi VasAlex, we couldn't find way 364627990 coming from база Белый ключ. Is it really there? Can it be deleted? pishi na ruskom esli udobna, spasibo, Sascha
sladen (2015-12-02 00:43:00+00:00): This changeset appears to have introduced some discontinuities as a result of moved nodes at the top of the Opicina tramway incline.
sladen (2015-12-02 00:43:15+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50148536#map=19/45.66265/13.78059
HolgerJeromin (2015-08-10 11:41:59+00:00): Danke! :-)
Peter Mead (2015-08-11 08:39:10+00:00): Hi there.  What is the boundary based on?  Did you want the whole campus or just the lecture buildings?  It looks to me like an odd subset of the campus.  You've included the South Courts but not the North Towers.
oopae (2015-08-11 13:33:01+00:00): Yeah I didn't do it properly. It was done in a rush to test a program that would have osm embedded in it.
Basstoelpel (2019-01-14 17:54:02+00:00): Very interesting that you were able to see wind farms on bing images. I can only see a lot of (probably dead) single trees.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-18 20:38:52+00:00): Are you sure about this one?  The current OSM mapping (and imagery) suggests that it is inside a quarry.  If that is the case, it seems unlikely that it is a natural=peak?
CYM1988 (2015-09-18 20:48:42+00:00): The quarry does indeed comprise of most of the hill here, the old summit cairn still remains however in a small area near some old footpaths/tracks a few meters from the quarry edge. It is still listed as a named hill, though understandably it could be a debatable one
SomeoneElse (2015-09-19 09:52:28+00:00): Would it be possible to check (i.e. go there and have a look) to see how much is left of it?  Copying a name from some external list doesn't really help with the quality of data in OSM itself.  The name "Cefn Mawr" means "great rock" I believe - if it's that "great" presumably it'd be visible even from afar on the main road?
CYM1988 (2015-09-19 10:24:51+00:00): I will take a look and see how it is on the ground there, From what I can remember when last on the road in that area it is fairly prominent but will see how much of the original hill is left from closer up
SomeoneElse (2015-09-05 14:16:00+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364638827#map=15/37.7117/126.5505 has no tags on it.  Is it a road, and if so sort what sort is it?
woodpeck (2015-08-11 10:10:30+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen/Relationen_sind_keine_Kategorien - mir scheint hier eine klassische Sammelrelation angelegt worden zu sein!
Kakaner (2015-08-11 10:12:05+00:00): Na wenn Gerichte nicht hierarchisch aufgebaut sind dann weiß ich auch nicht mehr. 

Kategorie: Gericht in Deutschland
SomeoneElse (2015-08-08 12:25:42+00:00): What's the licence information associated with the "Database of British and Irish Hills" (and where is it) and also "Haroldstreet.org" (which does not resolve for me currently)?
CYM1988 (2015-08-08 19:07:28+00:00): Hi, I mentioned on the Bwrdd Arthur changeset that it is the combined database of all named British and Irish mountains and hills. 

http://www.hills-database.co.uk/index.html

I have checked the licence status of the information and it appears to be under a free to use/distribute CreativeCommons licence. Haroldstreet.org.uk is a website that uses this information for the benefit of walkers and "hill baggers" as it provides accurate GPS derived locations as well as the names and elevations of hills and mountains. OS OpenData also derives names etc from these listings,  I have tried to be as thorough as possible in including info for validity
SomeoneElse (2015-08-09 12:36:47+00:00): Hi - thanks for the reply.  Re http://www.hills-database.co.uk/index.html , there may be an issue with the licence.  http://www.hills-database.co.uk/downloads.html says "Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License".  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2015-April/010552.html says "CC BY (and BY-SA) 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 require a form of 
attribution that is not practical for most map uses, so we need 
permission.".  If you are unable to obtain explicit permission to import into OSM then I'd definitely suggest asking the wider community so that someone with experience of licence issues can reply.  Haroldstreet.org.uk appears to be down at the moment but Google's cache http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.haroldstreet.org.uk/ shows a big copyright notice at the bottom.  Again I'd suggest getting explicit permission to import into OSM and asking the wider OSM community about it.
abdeldjalil (2015-08-13 20:57:03+00:00): ButterflyOFfire qu'est-ce que vous faites ??? tu corriges faux !!!!!
Dakon (2015-08-08 22:26:11+00:00): You probably meant emergency=fire_hydrant instead of amenity=fire_hydrant, no? Also it would be helpful if you could tag at least the type of it. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=fire_hydrant#Types .
trigpoint (2015-08-08 19:30:34+00:00): Is this summit significant? It is in a ploughed field so doesn't look like it is something we need to map. Have you actually been there?
Are all your local shops in osm? postboxes? Rather than copy from other maps, go out and survey something.
CYM1988 (2015-08-08 19:40:10+00:00): Hi, I added this as am familiar with the area and live locally but yes I agree that more valuable things do also need mapping locally. Shall have to get surveying :)
Hjart (2015-08-08 13:29:43+00:00): The correct way to handle this is to reverse the way (in iD press 'v')
Hjart (2015-08-08 13:35:16+00:00): See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Oneway for reference.
Hjart (2015-08-08 13:35:54+00:00): And by the way, welcome to our project.
derredu (2015-09-19 13:17:08+00:00): Hallo redrace, toll wie den Turm getaggt hast. Leider hast du auch viele wertvolle Informationen, die andere Mapper im Schweiße ihres Angesichts eingetragen haben einfach gelöscht (wie man wunderbar in der Chronik sehen kann, wenn man mit JOSM benutzt). Es wäre schön, wenn du den Stand bis zum 27.06.15 ergänzen würdest.
Grüße derredu
redrace (2015-09-19 15:19:00+00:00): HUHU
Das war keine böse Absicht. 
Ich hoffe ich habe alles erwischt!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21113435
Gruß Meik
derredu (2015-09-19 15:41:53+00:00): sieht gut aus! danke für die schnelle Korrektur.
redrace (2015-09-19 15:48:36+00:00): Keine Ursache! Ich habs ja auch verbockt!
SomeoneElse (2015-08-18 12:32:18+00:00): Hello - something seems to have gone wrong with San Francisco Airport at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1087017101 - a node of one of the taxiways got dragged by mistake and joined to another.  Do you need help fixing it?
pschonmann (2016-09-15 12:00:17+00:00): Bylo to potřeba ? Duplují se informace. Osmose to bere jako chybu. name=* implikuje že se jedná o cs
vop (2017-03-12 12:44:40+00:00): Toto bylo IMHO úplně zbytečné. Krom přidání duplicitních dat se strojově zdvojily i stávající chyby...
GerdP (2015-11-04 14:35:40+00:00): Bitte prüfen:
Das tag highway=road_surface_marking
wird nur von Dir verwendet.
Generel ist es eher unüblich, die Markierungen zu mappen, falls Du daran hängst, siehe bitte hier:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:road_marking
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-01-20 11:00:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285208875 - adres Hucisko 37 ma prywatny dom i nie jest to nawet plebania.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-09 14:14:41+00:00): Hi - just for info the gyratory system here is being discussed on talk-gb https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2015-August/017663.html
xtorm (2015-08-08 16:07:52+00:00): Picture of this PDI http://www.diseñoparatodos.es/observatorio/PublishingImages/Imagen14.jpg
trial (2015-08-08 20:34:08+00:00): un arbre ne s'appelle pas "arbre", c'est un arbre.
"name" n'a de sens que pour un nom spéficique d'un arbre par exemple "arbre de la liberté"
Skippern (2015-08-08 18:03:21+00:00): Quando voce fiz levantamento ai? Ambos Bob's no Guarapari e fechado ha tempo, esse local agora e um loja das roupas
mmorgado (2015-08-08 18:44:46+00:00): Skippern
Há quanto tempo fechou
Ultima vez que estive aí estive neste local ?
Skippern (2015-08-08 18:48:43+00:00): Eu tava ali ontem, o Bob's Shake nesse local e fechado pelo menus uns 6 meses, e ou outro Bob's fui fechado mais ou menus quando o McDonalds no entrada do cidade (novo Rodoviaria) fui inaugurada, ha 2-3 meses.
mmorgado (2015-08-08 18:53:32+00:00): Ha tá
Porque estive em Guarapari em Janeiro deste ano e estava funcionando
Já que você mora aí favor alterar para a loja correta
Skippern (2015-08-08 18:54:44+00:00): Obrigado :)
Skippern (2015-08-08 18:55:34+00:00): Voce pode procura ver no Mapillary, deve ter imagens no local mostrando nome da loja, não me lembro no cabeça
mmorgado (2015-08-08 18:56:24+00:00): ok
Retired Account (2016-01-24 14:17:02+00:00): Amazing...
prokyon (2015-09-23 17:06:41+00:00): Hi. The "Baden-Powell First Camp Meorial" seems to be missing an "m" ...
unsungNovelty (2016-05-12 05:49:22+00:00): Hi Zeke76,

I found that within this changeset, you may have accidentally deleted the tags for the Beaver Lake which I corrected in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39257951). 

Regards,
Nikhil
Peter_Reid (2015-08-08 17:49:41+00:00): The street renaming is an error, corrected in the next edit.
literan (2015-08-10 10:44:27+00:00): прошу вас не использовать тег name= нецелевым образом. Он - только для имен собственных. Описания дорог записывайте в тег description=
zvenzzon (2015-08-08 20:30:54+00:00): Can this note be closed now? http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/374795
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-02-16 13:07:02+00:00): Nie mam pojęcia czemu tę drogę zmieniłeś na unclassified: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60209577
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-11-10 10:17:38+00:00): Czemu ta droga stała się unclassified? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33028020 Przecież to zwykła polna droga... highway=unclassified służy do oznaczania dróg poniżej tertiary, będących np. głównym dojazdem do wsi. 
Takie zmiany z Twojej strony wyglądają jak wandalizm :-(
Hjart (2015-08-08 20:18:35+00:00): Vær opmærksom på at kystlinien ifølge wikien (se http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Coastline) ca skal følge højvandslinien (så vidt man nu kan se den) og ikke den vandkant man kan se på diverse flyfotos. Det er ikke så længe siden jeg flyttede den væk fra vandkanten i det her område, så det er lidt uheldigt du flytter den ud igen.
Hjart (2015-08-08 20:23:19+00:00): Undskyld, jeg syntes lige det så ud som om du havde rodet med kystlinien. Men det heller ikke så længe siden jeg har forsimplet stranden i det her område, fordi det alligevel ikke er realistisk at tegne den så præcist efter vandkanten som du har gjort her.
luiswoo (2015-08-09 08:12:33+00:00): В принципе, обычно поправляют названия улиц, но на всякий случай, есть такое соглашение: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
viisauksena (2015-08-08 18:54:38+00:00): http://www.badische-seiten.de/bilder/zweribach-wasserfaelle/?o=zweribach-wasserfaelle&n=8
realjep (2019-07-15 02:57:25+00:00): Hi, it looks like the skateshop closed forever at this location.
Himké (2015-08-08 20:52:58+00:00): http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2008/tw/0815n07.htm
Hjart (2015-08-08 20:55:16+00:00): Vær opmærksom på at jeg højst sandsynligt reverterer det du laver her, eftersom det slet ikke er realistisk.
Himké (2015-08-08 20:50:55+00:00): http://www.releases.gov.nl.ca/releases/2012/tw/0622n02.htm
Hjart (2015-08-08 21:09:14+00:00): Shelter? Don't you mean bunker? And where do you get the name from?
SiB64 (2015-08-15 13:45:29+00:00): Bunker is probabaly a better word, yes.
The words "Be Free"  are painted on this concrete bunker in very big letters for the last ten years or so.  It's a landmark that is frequenly referred to as a reference for appointments on this beach.
Hjart (2015-08-15 14:19:29+00:00): Oh, I probably didn't pass this area since then :-)
SiB64 (2015-08-15 14:23:33+00:00): In earlier years there was an image of a sun on this bunker.  You may remamber that :-)  (I was involved repaining that sun, once, about 30 years ago.)
Himké (2015-08-08 21:06:29+00:00): http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/veterans-or-veteran-s-labrador-bridge-signs-stir-a-grammar-debate-1.3141324
uryevich (2015-09-21 12:07:45+00:00): Границы территории детсада №1652 построены по существующим дорожкам, что в целом неверно: дорога не должна одновременно являться забором. Надо исправить!
Asio_Tempest (2015-09-21 15:11:18+00:00): Для этого нужно уточнить расположение забора и дорожек на месте. Сам этого в ближайшее время сделать не смогу, т.к. сейчас не в Москве. По памяти делать тоже не комильфо. Предлагаю оставить в текущем виде до уточнения.
uryevich (2015-09-21 20:20:06+00:00): Ну, не стоило и обозначать тогда, если незвестна территория, тем более так неправильно.
Я поправлю.
Baloo Uriza (2015-08-21 15:55:48+00:00): Is this a four-way stop?  If so, the intersecting node should be highway=stop.  Otherwise, there should be a highway=stop node on the way closest to the stop bar or sign.  The neighborhood south of TU has a lot of good examples.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-13 07:25:58+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3264943 ?
jpennycook (2022-07-13 07:38:12+00:00): I think I am unlikely to go down there again (my current bike is not suitable for those tracks)
kaspesla (2016-05-07 02:01:53+00:00): Oops! Tewksbury Pond lost all its tags!