piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
redd (2022-02-09 19:04:45+00:00): Hi joe2812,
kann sein, dass du in dieser Änderung blind die Daten von Maps4BW übernommen hast, ohne Plausibitätsprüfung?
redd (2022-02-09 19:14:24+00:00): Hi joe2812,
zudem ist mir aufgefallen, dass du einige leere Knoten hinterlassen hast:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9278751463
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9278751460
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9278751462
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9278751461
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9278742071
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9278742070
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9278762414
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9278752082
redrace (2021-12-01 10:23:53+00:00): Wie kommst Du darauf, das dort ein Funkmast steht?
wobi9000 (2021-12-01 10:28:38+00:00): Hi, thanks for your question. Based on the satellite images I can tell that there is one.
redrace (2021-12-01 12:09:56+00:00): Tomorrow I will have a look. :-)
user_2066394 (2021-11-24 10:04:12+00:00): Bei der Bearbeitung wurde die Hausnummer 2 in der Mitterfeldstraße gelöscht, vermutlich versehentlich?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2371765670
user_2066394 (2021-11-24 10:21:19+00:00): Hier hätte man die bereits eingetragenen Knoten einfach in der Position verschieben und bearbeiten können.
Durch das Löschen und Neuanlegen geht die Versionsgeschichte verloren.
Bereinigt.
marc__marc (2024-08-30 10:26:02+00:00): Hello,
amenity=clubhouse without a _ :)
Regards,
Marc
Lee Carré (2021-11-26 14:15:51+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
pyrog (2021-11-26 14:56:00+00:00): @Lee, this changeset comply to the following recommendation from the wiki 😉

"General recommendation: changesets should be local"

* "keep changes within the same country"
Lee Carré (2021-11-26 21:54:56+00:00): That might have been true 1000 years ago, but the Channel Islands are no longer French territory. So, since your bounding box includes them, the changeset doesn't comply.

That's how I became aware of it, in the first place.
Herrieman (2021-11-23 22:50:06+00:00): The sidewalk here is on both sides I think (I remember vaguely and checked satellite imagery). Has this changed, since you only put sidewalk=left here?
redrace (2021-12-01 10:34:46+00:00): There is no communicationtower!
There are only antennas attached to the outer skin.
wobi9000 (2021-12-01 10:40:58+00:00): Well thanks for your feedback. I am not sure how to tag this property. Feel free to edit the mast.
redrace (2021-12-01 12:08:25+00:00): Look at this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2520866910
redrace (2021-12-01 12:17:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:communication:mobile_phone
wobi9000 (2021-12-02 08:52:08+00:00): Hello redrace, thank you for the correction. The ID-Editor is showing me the following warning "Antennas should be a standalone point based on its tags". However I think your tag makes perfect sense. Thank you for the osm wiki page.
Lee Carré (2021-11-26 14:16:27+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Denis_Helfer (2021-11-26 15:10:15+00:00): can't
Lee Carré (2021-11-26 21:56:11+00:00): Sure you can.

Why do you feel that you can't?
StC (2021-11-27 18:26:27+00:00): There are two conflicting guidelines here: the one you refer to, and the universal principle that changesets must be consistent (e.g. if you need to revert them).

It is unfortunate that Jersey is included in any bounding box that includes, say, Saint-Malo and Carentan. Do you imagine the number of changesets that would require to avoid that, for a single change in the French rail network?

We have started to discuss solutions such as including #France in large changesets, so as to facilitate automated filtering in your monitoring tools. Would that be an agreeable way forward to you?
Lee Carré (2021-11-28 10:48:26+00:00): Firstly, thankyou for being constructive, considerate, & solution-focused about this. Unfortunately a lot of other mappers are not, and just dismiss the problem.

“There are two conflicting guidelines here: the one you refer to, and the universal principle that changesets must be consistent (e.g. if you need to revert them).”

I'm unsure of the guideline to which you refer. Would you cite the relevant documentation, please.
I ask not because I doubt the claim, but that I simply want to read more.

“It is unfortunate that Jersey is included in any bounding box that includes, say, Saint-Malo and Carentan. Do you imagine the number of changesets that would require to avoid that, for a single change in the French rail network?”

I sympathise.

While more sets would be needed, I don't see that it would have to be many. A central France-only set, then a wide-short one (landscape orientation) to cover St. Malo, Brest, etc. A portrait one to cover the Thumb of France peninsula (since it shouldn't matter about extending out into the sea; perhaps except for those mapping seamarks).

I'm amused by the thought that this would all be so much simpler if the Channel Islands were still French territory.

There are open bug reports re tools handling large bboxes in less simplistic ways. I gather that it's a difficult problem to overcome (perhaps because of all the extra processing it would require).

“We have started to discuss solutions such as including #France in large changesets, so as to facilitate automated filtering in your monitoring tools. Would that be an agreeable way forward to you?”

I greatly appreciate this effort.

Something like tagging the changesets with such a clear hashtag would, I think, work elegantly under the circumstances.

For context; I do surveying via a nano-computer, thus use OSMCha for filtering. Though, if I recall, it handles hashtags. I'll need to check if it's able to apply a negative filter on them, though. For some things it can't; only an inclusive filter (editor string is one parameter which has this problem).
However, even if it can't, yet, then a real-world application makes for a stronger case to have the feature added. Plus, other filtering tools will still benefit.

So long as it's consistent, and applied when all the changes are only within France, then yes; simple, graceful, easy (to implement at both ends), and sounds like it would be effective.

I'm inspired to do some tinkering with OSMCha this afternoon.
Lee Carré (2021-11-28 13:30:56+00:00): “I'm inspired to do some tinkering with OSMCha this afternoon.”

Seems that OSMCha is not able to exclude sets by such parameters. ☹
StC (2021-11-28 19:03:11+00:00): - about the "other guideline", not sure where it is documented because I'm more or less summarizing discussions from the French-speaking Telegraph channel. I certainly sympathize with it, because it is more or less derived from ACID properties in databases and good practices when pushing commits in codebases. I hope someone else can be more precise about it.

- too bad about OSMCha, but maybe it's something that its developers would accept to consider? The filtering could be done on a polygon (that would work on all changesets) or on a regexp on the comments (that would require some effort from French contributors). 

I sincerely hope you and contributors who are more expert than me will be able to find and implement a solution that works. Otherwise, you'll just need a vote from your fellow citizens to change the geography :-)
Lee Carré (2021-12-01 17:35:25+00:00): “I'll try to find some time to search for any existing issues about the same problem / request.”

Just had a very brief look, and there does seem to be (other) demand for negation of multiple fields:
http://www.github.com/mapbox/osmcha-frontend/issues/507
http://www.github.com/mapbox/osmcha-frontend/issues/246
Lee Carré (2021-12-01 17:42:09+00:00): A left a brief comment, pointing to this CS discussion, in http://www.github.com/mapbox/osmcha-frontend/issues/246
MxxCon (2021-11-24 05:10:38+00:00): Hello.
Perhaps it would be better to tag that tickets booth as a vending machine, if it's that?
Also when naming things, please write out the full name without abbreviations. Computers can easily shorten words, but not the other way (for example St. could be Street or Saint). This article explains this topic in more details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114157682
Itd5sS6uZ (2021-11-24 14:52:10+00:00): Hi MxxCon,

Thanks for your helpful advice!

- I was wondering how to tag something like this automated ticket dispenser. Because it's not a full-blown shop for tickets, it's more of a vending machine, I agree with this tagging convention. I saw on the wiki/taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/vending#values) that vending could be "tickets" or "admission_tickets". I don't think it's  "parking_tickets" per se because you drive to the station (big building) and that's when you give the ticket to the inspector. Which one do you think is better?

- I knew about the abbreviation rule for streets. I think what you mean here is that it should be used on place names as well. (NJMVC should be New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission).

Although, I'm not sure if it should be expanded in the name tag because the wiki says
> Do not construct names for features[2] by combining the name of an enclosing feature with a description. ... A feature named 'Smith Fountain' within 'XYZ Park' should be tagged name=Smith Fountain but not name=XYZ Park Smith Fountain.

So perhaps because the name isn't appropriate, I should give the inspection node tags of name=Paramus Inspection Station and operator=New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission?
MxxCon (2021-11-24 18:35:47+00:00): What exactly is on that ticket? Just sequential number so people don't cut in line? Or proof that you paid for inspection? Perhaps "admission_tickets"?

Yes, that name/operator combo seems sensible. There's also official_name= tag you could use if you know that info.
Itd5sS6uZ (2021-11-24 19:27:37+00:00): The former. Just a sequential number.

I don't know the official name but I think the general name is Paramus Inspection Station. I've made the change to the name/operator in changeset 114194682.
mosis99 (2021-11-25 14:11:17+00:00): Perchè hai tolto il tag natural=water? è richiesto per il tag water=river come sulla wiki, di fatto viene renderizzato male
kevinchen1 (2021-11-26 05:22:39+00:00): Hi D3athRIot69,

Thanks for improving the map. I have changed the natural=grassland back to landuse=grass. natural=grassland is typically used in undeveloped areas. Here is a page with more details https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=grassland?uselang=en

thanks
Kevin
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114158479
carfog81 (2021-11-25 21:18:29+00:00): Hello. Please do not damage the multipolygon or administrative boundary relationships. This is a very common damage from Kaart mappers
(Inactive) Buddy-the-Elf (2021-11-30 17:57:40+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to my attention and making the necessary updates to the multipolygon.
kevinchen1 (2021-11-26 05:20:09+00:00): Hi Ethan,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for updating these rail features! This is a large change that updated many features over a wide area. Would you mind splitting the changes into smaller ones in the future?

Thanks
Kevin
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114159165
maraf24 (2022-03-14 09:26:40+00:00): Na zdjęciu widać budowę.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2022-03-14 12:47:10+00:00): Moje oczy i nowe zdjęcia lotnicze widziały ukończone i prawdopodobnie już zamieszkałe budynki.
maraf24 (2022-03-14 14:05:32+00:00): "prawdopodobnie"
Nie zgadujemy mapując. Na dostępnych 4 miesiące temu zdjęciach widać budowę.
Mirosław Żylewicz (2022-03-14 19:33:10+00:00): Mam zapukać do drzwi i zapytać czy ktoś tam mieszka? Przecież to absurd.

Budynek z zewnątrz jest wykończony a to oznacza, iż nie jest już w budowie.

Wiem to ponieważ mieszkam na osiedlu i widzę większość budynków w okolicy prawie codziennie.
maraf24 (2022-03-16 10:27:26+00:00): Nie oznaczamy, czy budynek jest zamieszkały, to nam do niczego nie jest potrzebne.
Jak napisałem w komentarzu: "Na zdjęciu widać budowę".
A zdjęcie jako podstawa edycji zostało podane jako źródło.
Tym samym edycja nie była zgodna ze źródłem - a do tego doszły inne podobne wątpliwe edycje w okolicy, wliczając w to sklep.
maraf24 (2022-03-14 09:26:08+00:00): Wycofałem. Na zdjęciu widać budowę.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-23 23:25:19+00:00): Hello Ethan1988 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Would it be possible to use more explanatory changeset comments than simply "updated" every time?
Best Regards,
Andy
Frans S (2021-12-03 13:19:07+00:00): Hello. A remark.
You uploaded these mappings twice. so duplicating the buildings.
Please make sure not to uploade them twice.
I removed the duplicated mappings.
Please improve your mapping skills as well. Your mappings are rather inaccurate and not squared.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114159799
MxxCon (2021-11-24 02:17:55+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "handball" and "american_handball" are 2 different sports. Pretty sure in this case it's supposed to be the American one..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114159928
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:39:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
osmviborg (2021-11-24 07:28:20+00:00): Revertet. This is most recent imagery: https://listservices.kortforsyningen.dk/#/map/WMS/orto_foraar_temp
GeoTheExplorer (2021-12-01 02:21:49+00:00): Thank you for the information, I'll keep this in mind for future edits. May I ask if this new resource that you have shared is documented for OSM use? I do not believe it's listed in the Denmark Contributors list (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Denmark)
osmviborg (2021-12-01 05:36:45+00:00): The images are temporary, but can be used freely, offset may be incorrect. Usually released at the end of the year.
BubbleGuppies (2022-01-08 16:37:28+00:00): Hello, Just a note that the tag building:level=* should actually be "building:levels" - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels

Thanks for your contribution.
ravali_78 (2021-11-24 05:01:42+00:00): Hi WillyG1,
I have fixed the alignment as building overlapping with residential road.Kindly check with way 690653661,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114164852.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114160570
kawino85 (2021-11-24 14:19:58+00:00): These houses have superb quality - but are they hand-traced or from the Microsoft dataset in RapiD?
engelsjk (2021-11-24 17:24:43+00:00): These have been hand-traced from imagery and then squared. Changesets that use the mapwithai dataset will have a source tag (eg changeset 104900434).
RicoElectrico (2021-11-24 12:12:44+00:00): Cześć, zamknąłem uwagi, najpewniej Twoje, zgłaszające zmiany w tym rejonie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2947064 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2443261
MarcinNH (2021-11-24 20:29:58+00:00): Jedna była moja. Problem w tym, że zdjęcia satelitarne na osm faktycznie nie ukazują jeszcze rzeczywistego wyglądu zajezdni, która notabene jest dalej przebudowywana. Powoływałem się na zdjęcia satelitarne z Google Earth Pro i zdjęcia z drona.
wireguy (2021-11-29 19:38:52+00:00): this turn restriction relation 12545493
has multiple 'to' values.   need to pick one
user_2066394 (2021-11-24 10:41:57+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/287609210
Das Rathaus ist wieder am früheren Standort? Da würde es Sinn machen, die Rathausstraße noch auf den neuesten Stand zu bringen.
user_2066394 (2021-11-24 11:04:30+00:00): Knoten wiederhergestellt und verchoben zur weiteren Bearbeitung.
barefootstache (2021-11-24 20:31:25+00:00): Genau, also Rathaus is wieder am früheren Standort, aber immer noch teilweise Baustelle.
user_2066394 (2021-11-24 20:44:39+00:00): Einwandfrei. Knoten liegt dort wie gesagt wieder bereit.
MxxCon (2021-11-24 02:22:32+00:00): Hello.
Please note "description" tag in this situation should be about the statue itself. Description of Hamilton should go into "subject:description=" tag. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114161063
Kovoschiz (2021-11-24 08:12:20+00:00): Bikes are by default allowed on bus-only roads, at least "public" roads. Safer to use `motor_vehicle=no`, instead of `vehicle=no` despite any empty white-in-red circle signs.
honeychuu (2021-12-01 17:24:01+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz, 

Thanks for the helpful advice. My edit was to make this highway consistent with the others in this bus station. Would you like me to replace all of the `vehicle=no` tags within this area?
archpdx (2021-11-26 07:44:50+00:00): Hi,
It looks like this changeset adds a generic name for https://www.osm.org/way/1001240657, note that we don't use names to describe features on OSM - see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
sparrowman980 (2021-12-04 23:57:46+00:00): I have updated this as par your suggestion.
blackboxlogic (2021-11-26 01:56:52+00:00): I noticed you marked 'abandoned=yes' on some of these airport features. How do you know?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114161303
Necessarycoot72 (2021-11-26 20:39:57+00:00): The x at the end of runways mark then as decommissioned
joel56dt (2021-11-24 04:31:44+00:00): Thank you for solving my fixme
真中あお (2023-05-21 14:41:52+00:00): 我不太理解阁下这次编辑的用意，为什么把标签由动物园改为公园？
MxxCon (2021-11-24 02:32:57+00:00): Hello.
The correct tag for facebook is "contact:facebook=" as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114161991
Carnildo (2021-11-24 03:58:06+00:00): You turned Okanogan County into a river.  I've fixed it, but please be more careful in the future.
Glassman (2021-11-24 21:29:39+00:00): According to your lat/long the peak is just a few feet south of the actual peak. Another OSM editor, JOSM has the lat/long displayed on screen. JOSM is available at josm.openstreetmap.de. Let me know if you need.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114162226
AngocA (2021-12-10 22:05:12+00:00): Los living streets no existen en Colombia.
Barto920203 (2021-12-10 22:46:51+00:00): Revisar Anexo 8 del Decreto 190 de 2004 por el cual se reglamenta el Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial (Sección vial tipo V8-A) Vías de tránsito compartido peatón-ciclista-vehículo
WoodWoseWulf (2021-11-24 20:42:01+00:00): Hi Ruthlessmoose,

Welcome back to OSM!

I note that you have added a couple of parks over houses. Parks are defined in a certain way on OSM, and this doesn't include private residential yards.

You can read more about parks on OSM, here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
vulasala (2021-11-24 10:15:40+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005725169 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114162629
vulasala (2021-11-24 10:13:44+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005726264 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114162772
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:57:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
vulasala (2021-11-24 10:12:15+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005729497 and way 1005729498 which are duplicated ways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114162827
bikingaround244 (2021-11-24 03:04:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114162840#map=19/34.23412/-83.86668&layers=N
vulasala (2021-11-24 10:10:17+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005731130 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114162889
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:56:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
vulasala (2021-11-24 10:09:08+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005735392 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114162955
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
Sunislife10 (2021-11-24 03:26:54+00:00): Edit: Sources also included https://github.com/osmlab/appledata/issues/160
vulasala (2021-11-24 10:05:41+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005739166 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114163186
nevw (2021-11-24 21:13:47+00:00): It would be helpful if you added the usual address and contact tags and placed the location over the building each operates from. You also need a primary tag that categorises the business type. These tags have a specific format so that when entered in to the osm database they can be used by maps and search engines. Don’t try to guess the format but search the wiki or look at the tags of other well mapped businesses.
ottwiz (2022-01-01 17:49:25+00:00): Hello! Sorry, but I mapped the forest and we distinguish the state forest boundaries from landcover boundaries. The state forest boundaries don't usually respect the landcover boundaries, and in OSM we rarely tag state forests as landuse=forest, we only do that if the state forest respects the landcover boundary 100%.

I'd have to discuss this in #local-michigan in OSM US Slack(https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) what the other Michigander support, like this that only the state forest cover is supported, or also the non-state forest cover.

By the way, not entire Michigan is forested, the southern part is literally a dairy land.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-03 04:25:03+00:00): @EotS - why you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13014217 ?

Thanks to ZeLonewolf for fixing that.
vulasala (2021-11-24 10:02:12+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005746470 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114164080
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:57:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.
vulasala (2021-11-24 10:00:04+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005747140 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114164206
vulasala (2021-11-24 09:56:55+00:00): Hi ron_harvie,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1005747639 which is a duplicated way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114164256
marczoutendijk (2021-12-04 10:57:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114550822 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism of user adding new highways on top of existing ones.