piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
4004 (2022-05-24 16:16:35+00:00): я немного запоздало, но все же - вы тут отметили 1 полосу на дороге, которая не односторонняя. так понимаю, это ошибка https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399094477
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:36:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
DD1GJ (2021-01-26 22:14:13+00:00): Hallo,
Du "testest" hier direkt in den Echtdaten einer Geodatenbank höchster Qualität. Daher habe ich deine "Spielereien" komplett zurückgesetzt.
Wenn Du eine private Karte erstellen willst, dann verwende bitte https://umap.openstreetmap.de/de/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:56:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
mariotomo (2021-01-29 20:29:26+00:00): cordial bienvenida a OSM.  disfruta y gracias.  ya revisaste el wiki, y las páginas dedicadas a Panamá?  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Panam%C3%A1
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:51:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
OPerivar (2021-05-11 22:10:37+00:00): Moin, 
bitte Straßen durchgehend nach einer Klassifikation ihrer Bedeutung taggen. "Wechselt der Ausbaustand im Verlauf der Straße (breite Landstraße und enge Ortsdurchfahrt), so wird sie dennoch durchgehend nach ihrer Verkehrsbedeutung eingestuft. Der bei Straßen mit angrenzenden Wohngebäuden übliche Wert highway=residential ist daher bei Durchgangsstraßen nicht zu verwenden." siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:41:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:37:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-01-28 11:43:21+00:00): Salut! Selon nos photos aériennes, la piste cyclable sur cette section du boulevard Foucault n'a pas de séparation physique entre la voie cyclable et les voitures. Pour qu'on puisse bien distinguer la qualité des infrastructures cyclables (lane est plus dangereux que track avec séparation physique), je propose de conserver cyclway=lane ici. À moins que des travaux aient été effectués à cet endroit depuis la prise des photos. Qu'en pensez-vous?
ToniE (2021-01-27 09:17:39+00:00): Servus flierfy,

die 'role' = 'line' gibt es für public_transport:version = 2 (PTv2) relationen nicht. Straße, Gleise haben dort keine 'role', auch nicht 'forward' oder 'backward' wie bei der alten PTv

Gruß,
Toni
flierfy (2021-01-27 12:37:15+00:00): Hallo Toni,
in welchem Element ist denn der Tag role=line gesetzt? Zum Einen kann ich ihn nicht finden, zum Anderen kann ich dazu nicht viel sagen, das ich diesen Tag nie verwende.
Viele Grüsse,
Stephan
ToniE (2021-01-27 13:05:04+00:00): Hi Stephan,

das hatte ich schon korrigiert, daher nicht mehr auffindbar.

Ein Element kann in Relationen eine Rolle haben.
Bei Mulipolygon-Relationen können das outer, inner, ... sein. Bei Turn-Restrictions from, via, to.

Bei Route-Relationen: platform, platform_entry_only, platform_exit_only, stop, stop_entry_only, stop_exit_only für Haltestellen(-Elemente). Die Wege (Gleise, Straßen, ...) in einer solchen Route-Relation haben keine Rolle.

Im JOSM sieht man das im Relations-Editor-Fenster bei den Member in der linken Spalte.

PTNA (ptna.openstreetmap.de) hatte mehrfach über Nacht solche neuen 'role' = 'line' Einträge in Route-Relationen gefunden, der letzte Bearbeiter schienst immer du gewesen zu sein.

Wenn's jemand anderes war, dann Entschuldigung, muss nochmals nachforschen, wer's war.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
wireguy (2021-01-26 20:53:28+00:00): Hi Jason, Welcome to OSM!   Thanks for fixing the road geometry(s), looks correct.   But, the driveways seem like correct Amazon edits.  You may want to revisit, as they use them for delivery routing.
Jason Bosslett (2021-01-26 21:54:41+00:00): Thanks - good to know.  I didn't realize that.  I thought it was just some automated process that converted any asphalt looking surface to road.  Will revert those changes...
wireguy (2021-01-26 22:04:50+00:00): Great!  if you have any q's, just ask, and I'll try to answer.
Or if you want, there is a Discord and Slack for osm.
ivanbranco (2021-01-27 10:02:56+00:00): Hi Mauro,

NombreJefe=* is not a valid tag
RicoElectrico (2021-10-20 01:28:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2902492
jmapb (2021-05-20 15:14:29+00:00): Hi sdelmont, I've reverted this changeset with changeset 105037140 due to some errors. Let me know if you want any details.

Cheers, Jason
sdelmont (2021-05-20 15:40:49+00:00): Yes Jason, I'd love it if you can tell me what I did wrong so I can avoid making the same mistake in the future.
jmapb (2021-05-20 16:10:01+00:00): The problem I noticed was that you combined two trail segments, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284692868 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415181293 . These are both part of the same trail, but 415181293 is part of the Long Path relation ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6198495 ). So when they're combined, the trail down to Woodland Valley Campground becomes part of the Long Path too, which it isn't (though it used to be years ago.)

In general, when you see a trail or road split for no reason -- there might be a reason!

The other things I noticed were
 - You connect the track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284744782 to Woodland Valley Road. I don't see a connection there, in fact I don't see this track at all. I'm not sure it really exists, which is why I have it tagged with a fixme. Someone  needs to scout for it on the west end where it connects to the Phoenicia East Branch Trail, and if it's there see how far it goes. (Or get permission from the private landowners on the east end.)
- Somehow the parking lot at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/816358666 became a multipolygon, which isn't necessary

Anyway, this is all fixed now. Let me know if you have any questions, J.
sdelmont (2021-05-20 16:32:58+00:00): Thanks!
mariotomo (2021-01-29 20:27:07+00:00): hola.  cordial bienvenida a OSM.  una sugerencia para que mejores la calidad de tus ediciones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
(aquí mencionas "casas" — sin indicar si fue mejorar, añadir, o qué — pero no editaste casas sino calles.)
4004 (2021-02-01 02:00:17+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правки.
тип обьекта уже указан тегом, а значит писать в название "дорога" нет смысла - если только это имя собственное этой дороги, в чем я сомневаюсь
JesseFTW (2021-11-19 13:50:07+00:00): You added an incomplete relation labeled Huntington ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12238511 ) in this changeset. The borders of that CDP seem to be elsewhere. Could you clarify what you meant by that?
BMACS001 (2021-11-22 19:22:35+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out! I meant to make a relation for the Town of Huntingdon, which contains but is distinct from the CDP of Huntingdon. I'll fix that now
JesseFTW (2021-11-22 20:20:36+00:00): Excellent, happy to help remind you of it!
gtalbot (2021-01-30 01:22:34+00:00): Le terme "cochon" ne s'applique pas pour Attraction.
Est-il possible de fournir plus de détails sur cette modification?
Si le but est d'indiquer la présence de policier, SVP ne mettre cette informations ici.
Merci.
shogun (2022-01-09 11:08:44+00:00): Hallo! Es ist schön, dass du dich beteiligst, aber du solltest (wenn möglich), wenn du Wiesen oder Ackerland einzeichnest, es genauer tun. Einfach grob einzeichnen, obwohl die Sat Bilder sehr genau sind. Das Verbinden von landuse und Straße ist seit Jahren nicht gern gesehen, weil Änderungen schwer durchzuführen sind. Ich nutze sehr viele Filter zum Zeichnen und da fallen mir solche Verbindungen fast nie auf.
Rps333 (2022-01-27 13:56:27+00:00): can you comment on this note? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3026339
ika-chan! (2021-01-26 21:55:06+00:00): Dang it, that was meant to be Maxar Premium. I think RapID struggles when the browser is open for a long time.
fredley (2021-01-27 14:30:22+00:00): I'd imagine these change throughout the year as different sports are in season?
ndm (2021-01-27 19:23:30+00:00): They are traced from Bing and could be considered "indicative" :-)
arte2002 (2021-08-10 22:09:45+00:00): Hola,

Gracias por mejorar OSM

En https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/900533290 que parece ser una presa, azud, ... sería más conveniente utilizar
Dique: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:waterway%3Dweir
Presa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:waterway%3Ddam

saludos
lololailo (2021-08-12 09:29:27+00:00): Tienes razón, usé dyke porque en las etiquetas predefinidas lo traducen como dique cuando el correcto es dweir. Pues tengo que corrergir unos cuantos que he mapeado. Muchas gracias por tu comentario
flohoff (2021-01-27 11:58:41+00:00): Moin,
die überarbeitung der Kreuzung Herzebrocker/Barkeystraße hat auch zu einer signifikanten verschlechterung (Also routingtechnisch) geführt. Die wird jetzt in den routern als deutlich langsamer bewertet dadurch sind da routen geschwenkt. Ich habe mir das mal angesehen und überarbeitet. Da waren fußgängerampeln nicht auf den nodes und random mäßig auf nodes ein junction=yes bzw crossing=yes verteilt.  

Ich hab noch die Fuß-/Radweg Kreuzung/Ampel über die Barkeystraße hinzugefügt. 

Auch entland des westlichen Radwegs an der Barkeystraße hab ich einiges korrigiert. Die litfaßsäule stand laut Karte östlich des Radweges was aber nicht stimmt und so zeugs. Kleine topologische Fehler.

Flo
Liquorland (2021-01-29 16:42:22+00:00): Hey,
mit welchen Werkzeugen arbeitest du um solche Veränderungen im Routing festzustellen ?

Mit dem korrekten anwenden von crossings/junctions/traffic_lights werde ich mich noch einmal beschäftigen.
Werde in Zukunft drauf achten gründlicher zu arbeiten bzw. weniger auf einmal zu bearbeiten.

Allesbesten Dank für das nachbessern :)
 Mfg
Illio (2021-01-30 02:48:57+00:00): Zdravím, tie chodníky, čo ste zakreslili priamo v budove, sú ako myslené? Nachádzajú sa v budove? Potom ich asi treba označiť ako tunnel=building_passage. Alebo sa nachádzajú na streche? Alebo kde?
aceman444 (2024-07-09 21:38:03+00:00): Alebo by mohli byt indoor=yes. Ktore napriklad myslite?
Illio (2024-07-09 21:40:34+00:00): Myslím, že medzičasom už to bolo vyriešené.
TrekClimbing (2021-01-26 23:33:28+00:00): Building changes from Bing
balint36 (2021-08-12 16:38:21+00:00): Szia! Soltvadkert, Szabadszállás, Pirtó, Kelebia, Kiskőrös, Kiskunhalas és Fülöpszállás állomások pontját átalakítottad megállás helyét jelölő pontokká, így ezek az állomások nem jelennek meg a térképen.
dasmarinas_mapper (2021-01-27 11:35:12+00:00): Thanks for your inputs! I will be making more edits around northern Cavite taking note of your inputs
JClem (2021-02-11 08:44:36+00:00): This change has broken the connection between Leighton Park Road and the footpath to its west (with old_name=Sandhole Lane). It is possible to walk from the road to the path, so there should still be a connection as there used to be.
JClem (2021-02-12 22:45:35+00:00): fixed in changeset #99198483
mariotomo (2021-01-27 19:33:24+00:00): hola y que bien que quieras participar a OSM.  antes que nada, OSM es una comunidad colaborativa.  es de gran ayuda si al proponer cambios a la base de datos el comentario explique cuál era la intención del cambio, algo que empiece con <verbo de acción> <objeto de la contribución>.  esto ayuda a los demás para revisar los cambios.
de todas maneras recibas mi bienvenida.
Karthoo (2021-01-28 20:50:27+00:00): Hey Chris,
Thanks for mapping all those sidewalks!
But I think I spotted a mistake: You added ford=yes at the end of one of the sidewalks (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8365782740). If you want to show that it is incomplete there, you should rather add fixme=incomplete. ford=yes is definitely wrong here because a ford is a place where a path/road crosses a waterway without a bridge.
Chris Hires (2021-02-22 01:35:47+00:00): Thank you Karthoo. I will update it.
felipeeugenio (2021-01-27 12:59:35+00:00): Hola Alonso. 
SI quieres dibujar grass dentro de los park está ok, pero luego de eso no agregue parques dentro de parques. Ya lo corregí. saludos
felipeeugenio (2022-05-30 20:48:21+00:00): Mapper refuses to make contact and provide information about the origin of the population in this zone; a source that doesn´t provide information of this kind.
We assume the number is a total invention from the mapper, along with many other editions he is known to make.
MajaMaravic (2021-02-20 09:31:08+00:00): Ja ti se obracam jos jednom, nemoj da brises tagove pre nego sto proveris sa korisnikom koji ih je uneo, int_name tag prosiruje pretragu i nema potrebe da brises samo izmeni ako mislis da je ime pogresno uneto.
nik994 (2021-02-20 11:11:57+00:00): У реду, хвала на савету! :)
❤️‍🔥 (2021-01-27 06:06:57+00:00): do you think https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=outpost would be appropriate? the problem is you then can't tag it as shop=supermarket...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98189292
CoyKoi (2021-01-27 20:55:42+00:00): I agree that does seem like a fitting tag to use. Maybe a valid situation to use multiple values: shop=outpost;supermarket
20180911 (2021-03-02 15:44:53+00:00): Hi, nice to see a new mapper in my current home town :)
No worries about "mistakes", as long as you don't delete or corrupt other peoples' work. You requested a review and here comes what could be done better.

What you did: drawing houses on the land which belongs to the houses, adding housenumbers (phantastic!) and postcodes.

What to improve: On the imagery there are houses in the south, followed by gardens and then a hut , shed or a garage (if you know the neighborhood, you can make the type more precise, I added generic buildings). Buildings should be only drawn where the outline of the building is.

What I changed: I made the houses smaller, added small buildings in the north and added a fence and a hedge as an example. I did not map more, so you can practice here. A before - after comparison of my changeset is here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100287886

Optional: If you like, you can add fences and hedges here

There is not really the one right way how to map something,  but guidelines can be found at wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Here in Folkestone most buildings are missing (can mostly be done from home) and a lot of shops should still be mapped and opening hours added (outside survey).
Cheers
user_6110846 (2021-09-24 14:53:20+00:00): ти на біса 
-- прибрав адресу з полігону Владівської шкіл 
--- прибрав тег operator в Йосипівській школі 
коли в тебе сперма замість мозга 
то не лізь взагалі у даний проєкт
iWowik (2021-02-01 08:07:09+00:00): День добрый!
что-то не так с номером улицы.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137804578/history
На ней name=2-я Анганорская улица
На домиках вдоль нее стоит addr:street=3-я Анганорская улица
Kovoschiz (2021-01-27 07:37:02+00:00): Please understand that `name=` refers to the common name, not any "correct" name that someone, some group, or even some countries finds it should be. Other `*_name=` are already recognized by location search engines. It is the responsibility of applications, including renderer and map software, to choose how to display all these names.
Kovoschiz (2021-01-27 07:38:15+00:00): Again, the most common name takes precedence for `name=`. You are totally encouraged to ask applications you are using to display all the names.
Kovoschiz (2021-01-27 07:39:10+00:00): This is definitely not a common interpretation. It's possible 2 features can share the same common name, which is what used in `name=`
mariotomo (2021-01-27 19:45:37+00:00): intenta tener cuidado con las intersecciones y el conectar objetos.  hay una comunidad online que te puede brindar ayuda para mejorar tus contribuciones: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Panam%C3%A1
manoj@123 (2021-01-27 07:13:23+00:00): Fixed highway type#MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98193819
Leonius_Bad (2021-01-27 14:12:09+00:00): Приветствую!
Подскажите, откуда Вы брали данные для мапинга Варгашей в рамках этого пакета правок?

Подозрительно оптовая правка просто :) Да и еще и с детальной адресацией.
woodpeck (2021-01-27 10:36:37+00:00): Why have you created a new account for this change instead of using your existing one? This makes it more difficult to follow who has made which changes.
user_12554270 (2021-01-27 11:26:37+00:00): I'm not sure I understand.  I wasn't involved in "kylenz"s edit).  I just happened to be following the discussion.
doublah (2021-02-11 12:44:20+00:00): Please refrain from adding fake names to places.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98194980
SomeoneElse (2021-03-19 10:11:04+00:00): Hello,
Can you provide a source for this change? You were previously warned about making dubious edits at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3860 , so if you can't we'll have to change this back.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_5359 (2021-01-27 15:12:17+00:00): Hello! Please use access=yes instead access=Yes!
JayTurnr (2021-01-27 04:42:15+00:00): The offset for Bing is 5.08; -0.90 at Canterbury East Station. I've not done everything, and there are loads more to go, but I was mainly testing. I don't think I'll be taking Canterbury on as a project.
user_5359 (2021-01-29 05:54:38+00:00): Hello! You add different nodes (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12UD) with 
    Des_cribtion=Sharenew dashte qazi
    Point_number=28
    colour=#efebe7
    name=28
I assume you mean description instead of Des_cribtion. But what means the key Point_name (and why have the key name the same value?)
Please correct this entries!
user_5359 (2021-01-29 05:57:16+00:00): Hello again! Please stop adding objects to OSM with wrong keys! see https://www.osm.org/changeset/97695076.
CoyKoi (2021-03-03 20:14:53+00:00): Mary MacKillop Centre is no longer an assisted living, social facility anymore, it is now a Conference Centre:
http://www.marymackillop.org.nz/auckland/

My understanding is that the amenity=social_facility should be applied to the overall grounds, rather than to each individual building
CoyKoi (2021-03-03 20:39:26+00:00): I've updated the site in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100373781
BCNorwich (2021-01-27 08:15:19+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please take a little time to learn about OSM best practice for contributing. You'll find it's a wonderful database to which you can add almost any information provided its added in the correct way.

Unfortunately in trying to promote your company you've added false information which negatively impacted the database. Thus I've reverted your changes.

I would normally try to help by getting info from the web but in this case, when trying to access your website I'm told "Warning: Potential Security Risk Ahead". So I can't help.

Regards Bernard.
clay_c (2021-05-26 02:08:03+00:00): Hi dchiles,

Looks like you merged the train station node onto the station building outline. Stations encompass more than just the buildings, so they should be kept separate. I went ahead and reverted this changeset.

-Clay
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:51:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
rocky2109 (2021-01-27 09:54:20+00:00): Used Source:Mapillary Images;OpenStreetCam
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98198464
philippec (2021-01-28 09:29:04+00:00): Mariakerke, domein Bovy-Vyncke aed.
Ik krijg nog steeds "unknown area" in Imgur.
Enkele Mapillary foto's is trouwens veel beter.
HMAID (2021-02-01 04:58:57+00:00): Deze data is ingevoerd via https://cyclofix.osm.be
Daar heb ik gewoon op vragen geantwoord en een foto geupload. Wat bedoel je met "unknown area"?. Dat er geen GPS-coördinaten aan de foto gelinkt zijn? De foto is genomen met een fototoestel zonder GPS-tracker. Ik beschik niet over een smartphone. Dus weet ik niet of ik Mapillary kan gebruiken.
philippec (2021-02-01 09:43:15+00:00): Mijn fout, ik denk dat ik cookies moet aanvaarden voordat ik de foto's kan zien op Imgur. 
Met de Web Uploader in Mapillary is het mogelijk de foto's op de kaart te plaatsen.

Het gebeurt regelmatig dat ik aan de hand van foto's fouten kan verbeteren.

Ik ken iemand in Gent die daar zal gaan fotograferen voor mij zoals aan de Patijntjesstraat.
philippec (2021-02-01 17:32:47+00:00): #cyclofix
U hebt de aed losstaand in het groen perkje gezet.  Ik zou verwachten opzij van het gebouw, waar meestal de dienstingang is.
HMAID (2021-02-02 05:32:15+00:00): Inderdaad. De locatie ziet er nu beter uit.
philippec (2021-02-02 09:46:59+00:00): Neen.
Ik hoop dat u intussen met ID werkt.
En een Save doet.