piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-20 17:25:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:37:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:28:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:52:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:53:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:37:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:43:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:47:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:45:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
4004 (2018-06-22 08:13:36+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты
такие "дороги" не называем - название придуманное, в кадастре или где либо еще не значится, кроме вас им никто не пользуется.
также, если баня для только вашего личного пользования, то отмечать ее не стоит
hoserab (2018-06-21 23:04:53+00:00): Hi D3000x, I just wanted to let you know I have deleted the POI node you added here, and as you're a newer mapper I want to explain why. The Science Centre building, the polygonal object on the map, already had all of the address and contact info tagged. Duplicating information on the map just makes it larger, and hence more for someone else's device to load.

I want to make clear that you didn't do anything *wrong*, but as a rule of thumb if a building has a single tenant and purpose there's no good reason to not just tag the address and contact information there, rather than add a POI node. The Spark science centre building itself has no other name, no other tenant, no suites or units or other tenant spaces to speak of. Whereas in buildings with multiple tenants—say an office building like The Bow—the building itself ought to be mapped separately (especially because it has its own name), and those tenants ought to be added as separate nodes.

Just wanted to share this for your info. There're loooooooooooots of other things to map in Calgary, and as a local mapper I appreciate contributions from others. Thanks!
aseerel4c26 (2018-06-29 05:16:09+00:00): note: the (fixed) issue is/was discussed in https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/64426/city-removal .
dikkeknodel (2018-07-02 06:45:19+00:00): Hallo asdf2,
Mit dieser Changeset hast du Wege gelöscht die im Changeset womit sie eingetragen würden diskutiert werden. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59897003
Löschen gehört nicht zu 'fix tagging', würde ich sagen. Du hast Recht dass es Fehler gibt, aber löschen ist dann nicht die Lösung, sicher wenn ein neuer OSM Nutzer ein Review gefragt hat für den Changeset. Diskussion soll immer der Anfang sein. 
Kannst du die wegen bitte zurücksetzen, sodass diese mit die richtige Markieren versorgt werden?
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-07-11 12:53:01+00:00): Hallo?
Piz Pachific (2018-07-22 23:07:42+00:00): Hallo dikkeknodel. Zurück aus den Ferien kümmere ich mich nun um deine Beanstandung. Du hast Recht, ich war wohl etwas zu eifrig am Werk und werde in Zukunft wieder versuchen, die Sachen detaillierter anzuschauen, bzw. die Changesets "Themengerechter" machen. Habe vorhin versucht, meinen Changeset mittels JOSM zu reverten. Leider gab es aufgrund meiner zwischenzeitlichen Ferienabwesenheit einige Konflikte durch andere Bearbeitungen, weshalb ich dich frage, ob es nicht einfacher wäre, diese ungetaggten Wege nochmals neu einzuzeichnen? Lg (und danke für deine wertvolle Arbeiten!)
dikkeknodel (2018-07-23 06:49:44+00:00): Hallo asdf2,
Danke für die Antwort. Ich hoffe du hast ein schönen Ferien gehabt. Vielleicht gibt es jetzt wieder viel zu erarbeiten in OSM :-P. 
Ich habe es schon korrigiert und die Daten sind jetzt korrekt wie der Mitarbeiter freitag_c es gemeint hat.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
Piz Pachific (2018-07-24 23:36:33+00:00): Besten Dank und sorry für die Zusatzrunde.
dvdhoven (2018-06-22 07:41:16+00:00): Als je een knooppunt verplaatst, moet je het oude knoopunt uit de netwerkrelatie verwijderen. Dat heb ik nu gedaan.
Ik weet niet of je de plugin utilsplugin2 al hebt geïnstalleerd, anders moet je dat asap doen. Daar zitten zoveel handige dingen, die je regelmatig nodig hebt. Als je die plugin installeert, krijg je een extra Menu More Tools met als een van de opties Replace Membership. Daarmee kun je het membership van een relatie overzetten.
In het geval van een verplaatst knooppunt, selecteer je eerst het oude knooppunt en dan het nieuwe en je kiest Replace membership. Dan wordt het membership overgezet en hoef je de oude niet meer uit de netwerkrelatie te halen. Wel oppassen, dit gaat alleen goed als het een knooppunt is van 1 soort. Vaak zijn rcn en rwn knooppunten gecombineerd en dan moet je wel met de hand alles doen.
Replace membership kan ook handig zijn als je een route van een weg naar een andere weg wilt zetten.
Topo GPS (2018-06-22 13:54:37+00:00): Beste dvdhoven,

Het spijt me dat ik vergeten was om het oude knooppunt uit de netwerkrelatie te verwijderen.
Dank voor de tip van de plugin, ik zal hem direct installeren. Ik zal de volgende keer replace membership gebruiken bij het verplaatsen van een knooppunt.
pbUJb (2018-07-17 21:04:52+00:00): Здесь двухстороннее движение!
Zverik (2018-07-18 10:41:36+00:00): Hi! Please check other sources when making edits that affect routing. This strip of road is bi-directional. You can confirm this with the Google Street View: https://www.google.com/maps/@55.667054,52.3459771,3a,75y,249.57h,84.02t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sGNkMXEK7M3oq2vWut6V49w!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
mapzania (2018-07-18 19:43:11+00:00): Hi pbUJb and Zverik, The street-pano you linked shows traffic traveling in one direction but also signage in the other direction. I was using OSM GPS traces along with satellite imagery to add this oneway which seemed to confirm oneway but your provided resource confirms as bi-directional. I will be more careful in the future. Thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-24 23:36:01+00:00): There seems to be a trend in your changesets in unnecessarily upgrading highway=* tags where it's not warranted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60056945
Andrew Matheny (2018-06-25 14:07:51+00:00): Generally speaking, arterials in urban/suburban areas receive a highway=secondary while collectors get a highway=tertiary. Even though they're laid out in a grid pattern and some only have two lanes, it seems pretty intuitive that these are arterial roadways from a functional classification standpoint. The local COG thoroughfare plan would seem to agree (http://www.incog.org/Mapping_GIS_Resources/Documents/Major%20Street%20&%20Highway%20Plan%20Map.pdf)

At the end of the day, it's not any hill I care to die on because it's not my metro. But I would disagree that it's "not warranted" when you start spotting collectors that need a tertiary tag and the arterials they feed into would be at the same classification.
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-30 14:55:37+00:00): While I understand the COG's ideas are a bit aspirational, these tend to be pretty minor roads.  You updated 88th Street to tertiary, for example, and I'm not even sure where the COG is getting that idea considering the only thing that really seperates it from any other side street in the neighborhood is that the 112 bus cuts over to Delaware because it can't make the sharp curves on Lewis south of 88th if traffic turning left is present.
Andrew Matheny (2018-07-05 14:31:44+00:00): Fair enough. If you think the tertiary tags are more warranted, I'm not going to pretend to know someone who lives in the area :)
dgitto (2018-06-23 04:53:17+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM.
Due osservazioni: normalmente il tag leisure=park si usa su aree, non su singoli nodi. Del resto non mi sembra ci sia un parco lì(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark).
Inoltre amenity=fountain si usa per le fontane ornamentali. Questa è una "fontana" o è una fontanella per bere? fai sempre riferimento al wiki quando hai dubbi:
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity=fountain)
Buon mapping
joost schouppe (2018-06-25 06:52:12+00:00): Looks good, oneway heading north now. In Belgium, you never know if the oneway is for cyclists too. So it is very useful to add oneway:bicycle = yes/no too (if you remember there not being or being an exception)
viloan (2018-06-21 21:35:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
letihu (2018-08-21 21:18:53+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM! 
Ich habe gesehen, Du hast ein paar Sachen gemappt. Die Wasserwege müssen immer müssen immer miteinander verbunden sein. 
Diese 3
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5709705783/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5709716728/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5709716731/history
waren nur unverbunden übereinander.
Vielleicht kannst Du demnächst das noch etwas besser machen.

Ich wünsche dir noch viel Spaß bei OSM, und lass dich bitte von meinem Hinweis nicht entmutigen - wir alle machen am Anfang nicht so ganz optimale Sachen.
luiswoo (2018-06-22 06:07:44+00:00): Это просто Нахичевань, Нахичевань-на-Дону не существует почти век.
pbUJb (2018-08-10 08:20:58+00:00): This is a two-way movement!
mapzania (2018-08-13 21:21:19+00:00): Thanks for your help
scratera (2018-06-24 17:21:15+00:00): posso suggerirti 
highway=via_ferrata
...preso da qua https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/via_ferrata
...comnseguenza di questo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/cai_scale
viloan (2018-06-21 22:33:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
marc__marc (2020-11-29 01:51:37+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez renseigné une bureau de poste nomé la banque postale.
est-ce que cela signifie qu'il y a un service banque postale dans le bureau de poste ?
Cordialement,
Marc
AlaskaDave (2018-12-14 13:40:28+00:00): Hi,

I noticed you removed the man_made=pier tag from a pier in Dutch Harbor. You saved it as natural=coastline, with access=private and surface=wood but removed the man_made=pier tag so it makes no sense now.

Can you take a look? It is way id:21477171

Thanks,
Dave
electronicservicerequested (2018-06-21 23:28:23+00:00): Make that beeping stop!!! :)
giggls (2019-05-03 11:28:58+00:00): Du hast den Weg 121951095 als asphaltiert markiert.

Das stimmt nicht, das ist ein Schotterweg.

Sven
Leo Slager (2018-06-23 09:30:50+00:00): Daarbij zijn de routes van 4 bus lijnen beschadigd geraakt. JOSM geeft daar ook een waarschuwing voor en met JOSM is dat ook makkelijk te herstellen.
Of je vraagt of iemand anders daar even naar kijkt.
Leo Slager (2018-06-23 09:31:48+00:00): De routes zijn weer gerepareerd.
user_5359 (2018-06-25 11:15:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must reverted your change set because the position and the key values are visible wrong
JJIglesias (2018-06-23 13:16:14+00:00): Saludos: Si quieres crear tu casa NO se pone el Nombre de quien vive si no el numero de casa y el nombre de la calle. La Urbanizacion Arco Iris ya existe; asi q borramos el Guest_house o casa de huespedes q creaste. Favor leer el tutorial para editar el mapa en 

http://learnosm.org/es/

Gracias
literan (2018-06-23 11:16:49+00:00): Hallo. Unfortunately, very bad edit. You have moved only part of roads, so made the squash of auto and pedestrian roads. Please be more accurate (this new road was precisely mapped according to construction design layout). Maybe we have here some problems with offset, but it must be corrected more carefully. I will revert this edit
RiverBearings (2018-06-27 23:04:16+00:00): Iiteran, Hello. I see after a second look of what you are saying with the conflict between moving roads and pedestrian ways at this interchange. This fix was complicated from a remote sensing perspective. Do you have any suggestions to correct the offset for this junction without the aid of the construction design details? DG Premium confirms that this highway is misaligned as OSM GPS traces show that imagery layer is geo referenced accurately. Your input would be most appreciated! Thank you.
literan (2018-06-28 08:57:48+00:00): Halo. I fixed this place manually, with gps tracks - aligned DGP imagery. Please, be careful next time: OSM is not only road map )) My edit: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60241425
ianlopez1115 (2018-06-24 14:21:19+00:00): Hello Patrick,

You may want to add the location of the relocated place of worship site.
ogalescopatrick (2018-06-28 23:40:36+00:00): Hello ianlopez1115,

The place is a car garage. There's no actual worship building in that area. I know because that's my uncle's yard and I'm just few houses away from that area. The priest is no longer conducting mass in that area. The mass is being conducted at a nearby church already included on the map.
user_5359 (2018-06-24 06:20:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
frafra (2018-08-06 22:24:38+00:00): Ciao steko!
Grazie per il tuo contributo :) Tieni presente che in Italia i numeri civici non sono legati all'intero edificio (un edificio può avere più civici), ma solo all'ingresso, quindi andrebbe aggiunto un nodo sul perimetro dell'edificio. Il creatore di StreetComplete si sta confrontando con la comunità italiana di OpenStreetMap (mailinglist talk-it) se bloccare questa "quest" in Italia. Ciao!