piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rokas111 (2019-08-17 17:42:09+00:00): Jei ka kreivai perstaciau tai atsiprasau, pirma kart naudoju, taciau valstybinis kelias ne sitoje vietoje
Tomas Straupis (2019-08-18 06:40:40+00:00): Dėl klaidų tai nieko tokio, aš pataisiau ir padėsiu, jei reikės dar kokios pagalbos. Bet pradžiai reikia išsiaiškinti, kaip ten kas yra vietoje :-)
1. Į pietus perkeltas takas tikriausiai yra paprastas miško takelis, o ne rimtas grįstas pėsčiųjų takas?
2. „Senasis“ takas visgi yra, tik tiek, kad jis yra privačioje žemėje, todėl priėjimas ribotas?
3. Senasis takas eina per pelkę, taip kaip ir matosi ortofotografijoje?
Rokas111 (2019-08-18 06:55:06+00:00): 1. Ten paprasciausiai yra proskina, prieimas prie ezero bei tiltelis.
2-3. Senasis yra dalinai padarytas, ten kur pradzioje misko atkarpoje irgi yra susidariusi pelke/bala per kuria pereiti siuo metu neimanoma.
Tomas Straupis (2019-08-18 07:03:48+00:00): Supratau, ačiū už info.
Tai 1. pakeičiau iš highway=footway į highway=path.
2-3. Praplėčiau pelkės plotą. Vakar šitoje vietoje atkeičiau/panaikinau highway=residential atgal į natural=wetland. Jei dabar takas nepraeinamas, tai jo ir nebraižysiu. Jei būtų praeinamas, galima būtų žymėti pridedant žymą access=private - viešai neprieinamas, bet fiziškai egzistuojantis takas, pvz. policija, greitoji ar gaisrininkai galėtų praeiti.
ajf3934221 (2019-08-17 10:46:48+00:00): nun, das ist wahrscheinlich diskussionswürdig, da 'smoothness' sich auf die Oberfläche bezieht und weniger auf das umgebende Gebüsch. Die Oberfläche ist sicherlich Mountainbiketauglich, sofern der Weg mal wieder freigeschnitten wird wäre dies auch problemlos möglich.  Passender für diese Situation fände ich maxheight: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight:physical
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73439389
ajf3934221 (2019-08-17 10:50:36+00:00): oh, jetzt fällt mir noch auf: es steht track statt path, also das stimmt ganz sicher nicht siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Die verschiedenen Werte von 'highway' werden anhand der *Verkehrsbedeutung* zugewiesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway

Grüße, 
Andy
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73439389
ajf3934221 (2019-08-18 08:21:08+00:00): Hoi, 
habe die Korrektur track->path gleich kurz umgesetzt: CS 73458000

Grüße, 
Andy
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-08 18:47:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147229399, 147229339 where the changeset comment is: revert data added by mapper who used swear words for names claiming to be the 'discoverer' of places
SHARCRASH (2019-08-17 11:05:24+00:00): + tag additions/corrections
mueschel (2019-08-17 13:56:07+00:00): Hi,
you added several thousand "naptan" keys with a wrong spelling, for example

naptan:atcocode -> naptan:AtcoCode
naptan:indicator -> naptan:Indicator
naptan:naptancode -> naptan:NaptanCode
naptancode -> naptan:NaptanCode
commonname -> naptan:CommonName
and several more.
Please have a look and fix these.

Jan
TonyS999 (2019-08-17 14:07:39+00:00): Yes I will do
TonyS999 (2019-08-17 16:09:27+00:00): Reverted this change set
mueschel (2019-08-18 11:56:33+00:00): Thanks, but it looks like there are at least 195 POIs left:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/LBQ
TonyS999 (2019-08-18 13:07:07+00:00): Changed those 195 and searched for other tags. I believe all the tags are now reverted.
abakus_uploader (2019-08-17 22:30:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_177389 (2019-08-17 12:19:19+00:00): Hi,

Your changes are not plausible. The sea polygon has the own relation. You have destroyed several relations. Administrative boundaries should contain land area only. And last but not least - a possible law about sea don't affect regions themself.

Best regards, Mario
SomeoneElse (2019-08-18 13:46:55+00:00): @Constrado - can you explain what you were trying to do here with changes such as your edits to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714624722/history ?  Your comment here is "update" which doesn't help other people to help you.  Please explain what you are trying to change and why.  Unless you use more meaningful changeset descriptions we might have to prevent you from editing in OpenStreetMap.
@Garmin-User I'd suggest commenting both in a language that you're familiar with and one that the person that you're trying to communicate with too (a machine translation should do)
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2019-08-18 13:47:36+00:00): @Constrado - czy możesz wyjaśnić, co próbowałeś tutaj zrobić, wprowadzając zmiany, takie jak zmiany w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714624722/history ? Twój komentarz tutaj to „aktualizacja”, która nie pomaga innym osobom ci pomóc. Wyjaśnij, co próbujesz zmienić i dlaczego. O ile nie użyjesz bardziej znaczących opisów zestawów zmian, być może będziemy musieli uniemożliwić Ci edycję w OpenStreetMap.
@Garmin-User Sugeruję komentowanie zarówno w języku, który znasz, jak i w języku, z którym próbujesz się porozumieć (tłumaczenie maszynowe powinno zrobić)
Z poważaniem,
Andy Townsend, w imieniu grupy roboczej OSM ds. Danych.
user_8023523 (2019-09-02 14:30:08+00:00): I did so because that is what the maritime law of the Republic of Poland says : http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20170002205/U/D20172205Lj.pdf
viloan (2019-08-17 12:07:12+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2019-08-17 16:37:11+00:00): 為什麼要變動臺灣的國家關聯呢? 
OpenStreetMap是依據de facto事實為依據記載，並不遵照特定國家的區劃。如你繼續不顧事實的編修，最嚴重將提報Data Working Group，最嚴重將被封禁。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73441457
Supaplex (2019-08-17 16:37:29+00:00): 为什么要变动台湾的国家关联呢?
OpenStreetMap是依据de facto事实为依据记载，并不遵照特定国家的区划。如你继续不顾事实的编修，最严重将提报Data Working Group，最严重将被封禁。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73441457
Supaplex (2019-08-17 16:38:59+00:00): Why do you change Taiwan National relation?
OpenStreetMap is a geodata database aggregated by de facto truth. If you ignore the de facto situation, you will be ban by the Data Working Group.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73441457
Tomas Straupis (2019-08-18 06:57:29+00:00): highway=path yra savaime žmonių pramintas takelis, jei tai savivaldybės specialiai nutiestas šaligatvis - tai highway=footway.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-20 20:34:10+00:00): Annnnd here we go again:

Just like last time, private message received from the mapper in question:

"I am not sure why you did this or what this is all about? I was out in this area and that’s why I adjusted the creek because it was in the wrong area. I’m not sure why you deleted everything. You can check multiple map services to help verify such as bing, google, and Apple maps. Hopefully this was just a misunderstanding or mistake and not a malicious attack of some sort."

Note that CS: 73284106 switches from iD to JOSM with the exact same details, identical to 72366039 and 72240411 (which were also supposedly two different people).
edbort (2019-08-20 20:37:33+00:00): Hello, I was told before that you were supposed to contact the person before reverting something in case it was a mistake. I thought messaging you about your mistake was the proper thing to do.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-20 20:54:11+00:00): Oh c'mon, we've done this dance enough times and the DWG has already made a decision, placing blocks on two of your accounts.
edbort (2019-08-20 23:43:21+00:00): I don't understand what you are even talking about nor do I understand how you say this is not a stream? I went out of my way to post a screenshot of the osm definition of a stream and the actual stream in question (see links below). 

http://imgur.com/a/ACyOAET
http://imgur.com/a/XUoUIZl
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-20 23:48:07+00:00): Cute, and you're just going to ignore the fact that the same changeset resurrected your footway scribbles and the (fake) meadow park you've been repeatedly asked not to add?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73284106
edbort (2019-08-20 23:54:59+00:00): Are you asking for screenshots of osm definition of a footpath and pictures of footpaths as well? I'm not ignoring any facts. I just figured if understanding the definition of a stream was this difficult the rest would be to painful to explain. But I'm willing to help to the best of my ability.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-20 23:58:29+00:00): Hahaha, oh dear. Want to try to dodge the question a bit better? I'll give you another go.
edbort (2019-08-20 23:59:20+00:00): Clearly footpaths based on osm definition. I wouldn't rank them any higher

http://imgur.com/a/l3CEKC2
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 00:02:56+00:00): So you're saying that this house is surrounded by zigzagging footpaths that magically changed shape every time you added them until you worked out how to revert via JOSM?
edbort (2019-08-21 00:09:01+00:00): More information for you below. And no I'm saying that I reverted things that were there previously so that I could fix the location of a stream. Because other things were missing I reverted them back.

http://imgur.com/a/FiCLAkx

Apple maps screenshot
http://imgur.com/a/SrQfu6e

http://imgur.com/a/tOsxKWb
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 00:16:39+00:00): Okay:
1) We cannot use Google Maps or Apple Maps as a source. 
2) You made false reports to these sites to add these features anyway, so they are about as reliable as my drunk uncle.
3) You are attempting to do the same with Niantic games and are repeatedly being blocked from doing so.
4) You have been asked *multiple* times not to add these features back.
5) There is obviously no magical moving footways around your house.
edbort (2019-08-21 00:20:52+00:00): There really is no helping you. I cant keep wasting my time sending you screenshots of the definitions as well as photo proof just so you can argue the fact. It is not my fault that everything is legit and you refuse to believe it. I have done my best to help and each time you make up more nonsense on how it is fake and completely ignore the facts.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 00:25:29+00:00): Okay then, how about this - you send me a photo showing literally any footway at this location that zigzags remotely like this:

https://imgur.com/a/KmvUdMR

Should be fairly easy.
edbort (2019-08-21 00:30:48+00:00): You're killing me man. Give me about 10 minutes to drive on over there.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 00:38:04+00:00): Well, if you're driving out there specifically, I want this part:
https://imgur.com/a/XqHMxqi
edbort (2019-08-21 01:02:50+00:00): For your "literally any footway" I believe there are 7 in the link below.

http://imgur.com/a/igxY86i
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 01:06:13+00:00): You can't be serious...
edbort (2019-08-21 01:10:51+00:00): What do you mean I can't be serious? Don't tell me now with additional proof you are going to say that these footpaths aren't your definition of footpaths?
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 01:17:10+00:00): You're just being purposefully obtuse.
edbort (2019-08-21 01:20:59+00:00): Dude there is clearly no pleasing you. I took time out of my night to go take pictures of stupid paths because you asked for it. Not only did you ask for it you wanted just one picture. So I go out there and take pictures of multiple footpaths to try and provide even more evidence than was expected and you still complain.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 01:30:03+00:00): Do I really need to explain what you're doing here to you? I think you're quite aware of it.

My request was "showing literally any footway at this location that zigzags remotely like this".

You've cherry picked the first part of my request and sent me photos of the footpath between the house and the garage/shed and a few stepping stones out to garden features. no long zigzagging looping paths to be seen.
edbort (2019-08-21 01:37:25+00:00): There was a path going up to the road that goes up to a big Bent tree that zigs back. Also there was a picture of the trail going through the woods. All this is just how it was drawn. Don't forget to scroll down to see all of the pictures.  Also,you do realize that you were looking at an aerial photo that you sent of the paths right? Sorry I was only able to take pictures of all the paths (which at one point you claimed never existed and then last comment admit to them being there but I guess not to your liking) from the ground.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 02:13:34+00:00): Honestly, man, just re-read what you wrote in the context of this discussion and then maybe pack away your strawman argument. If you want to add the path *between your shed and house* or to your pool shelter, by all means, do it.

Further vandalism will be removed and you will be reported to the DWG again should it happen.
edbort (2019-08-21 02:23:39+00:00): Everything was re-read and I would appreciate it if you put the paths back since you got more proof than you expected and put the stream back since you got that photo evidence as well. I should ask you to put everything back but clearly that's an issue for you so let's get this over and move on.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 02:29:00+00:00): Yeah, I don't think you understand how this works. No zigzagging paths = no zigzagging paths, even if you take 1,000 pictures of other, unrelated paths.
edbort (2019-08-21 02:35:20+00:00): So just to make sure we are on the same page. If something is clearly 100% there you choose to remove it or not add it? If that is your thinking then it is pretty obvious that you don't understand how this works lol
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 02:40:12+00:00): You've got to be trolling, jeez louise.
edbort (2019-08-21 02:42:02+00:00): I was thinking the same about you. Either that or you might possibly be the most ignorant person I have ever dealt with. Haha
WoodWoseWulf (2019-08-21 21:56:11+00:00): Thank you for fixing this up, edbort.

This is much better now. 

I noticed you were trying to punch a hole for the garden bed - the best way to do this is to use a multipolygon and an "inner" area, I did one for you so you can see. holes in other features are much easier to draw this way and cause less issues rendering etc.

Best thing is, you still get your nesting area and it all appears to be real. Well done :)
edbort (2019-08-23 16:07:58+00:00): Thank you for your help WoodWoseWulf. Since you mentioned the gardens I looked in to the definition and added them around the area.
Hjart (2019-08-17 13:09:31+00:00): Jeg har slettet dette idet bygningen i forvejen var markeret på samme måde
Hjart (2019-08-17 13:12:54+00:00): Bemærk at der ikke bør "mærke" på både bygning og adresse/node. Enten det ene eller det andet. Ellers får vi dubletter
Bo Bank (2019-08-17 13:15:43+00:00): Ok men det er ikke Shell men en circle k tank
Hjart (2019-08-17 13:19:42+00:00): Den del havde du allerede rettet. Det er fint nok.
Hb- (2025-02-02 20:03:08+00:00): Dieses Kaffee https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1240781908 war keine Kanadische Filiale, sondern ein lokales Unternehmen.
Seva-snz (2019-08-19 18:33:43+00:00): Здравствуйте! Аренда автомобиля посреди леса выглядит сомнительно (да и на снимках ничего не видно), возможно вы ошиблись тэгом, проверьте
Hjart (2019-08-17 13:34:26+00:00): Var denne her ikke lukket?
Bo Bank (2019-08-17 13:38:11+00:00): Ups Jo
SomeoneElse (2019-08-18 14:12:13+00:00): OK - I've got to ask - what is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714745913 ?
josmougn (2019-08-21 20:39:07+00:00): salut Simon, je suis surpris que tu passes ce chemin à Orly https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4644711 de footway (tagué ainsi depuis 2007) en residential. Est-ce que les voitures y ont accès ?
simon_geovelo (2019-08-27 10:04:56+00:00): Salut José,
D'après notre utilisateur et avec confirmation de la BDOrtho IGN les accès de garage ce font par ce coté de la rue.
canfe (2020-12-02 08:04:19+00:00): Il 714748399, v1 non dovrebbe essere un monument.
Dalle immagini aeree mi pare piccolo.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
adriespo (2020-12-02 10:13:01+00:00): Non so. Ci si cammina dentro/sopra: vedi https://goo.gl/maps/CMkoPQsXWqAPKyD58

Ora, è tantissimo che ho fatto la rilevazione e non ricordo minimamente più il nome e l'iscrizione. Bisognerebbe andare e fare foto...
canfe (2020-12-12 08:19:05+00:00): Chiesto ad uno che abita lì, non c'è il monumento, è un magazzino per il materiale della festa patronale.
adriespo (2020-12-12 20:54:37+00:00): Davvero? Io ricordavo di aver letto qualcosa in loco, tipo una o più targhe.

Comunque se è un magazzino complimenti vivissimi per la qualità della costruzione...
eggie (2019-08-17 14:04:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Kijk even in de wiki welke tag hier nog meer bijhoort. alleen een naam in osm doet niet veel.

office=logistics  ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dlogistics

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-17 14:07:07+00:00): Probeer bij upload ook concreet commentaar te geven.
Bv transportbedrijf toegevoegd.
eggie (2019-08-17 14:41:28+00:00): office=logistics toegevoegd
Carto'Cité (2019-08-29 08:03:33+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces contributions.

Je m'interroge sur le nombre de highway=path que vous avez passé en highway=cycleway. Ce tag indique une piste cyclable réservée aux cyclistes. Lorsqu'une voie est partagée entre les piétons et les cyclistes il convient d'utiliser highway=path. S'il s'agit d'une voie verte il convient de préciser foot=designated et bicycle=designated, et si le panneau C115 est présent on peut ajouter traffic_sign=FR:C115.

Par exemple, sauf changement récent, il me semble que la voie https://www.osm.org/way/493411308 est une voie verte, et devrait donc avoir le tag highway=path. Est-ce que vous confirmez qu'il s'agit d'une piste cyclable réservée aux cyclistes, ou il s'agit d'une voie verte ?

Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto'Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
Aradrin (2019-08-30 04:32:54+00:00): Bonjour Antoine, j'ai fait ces modifications en utilisant l'éditeur par défaut. Celui-ci propose un choix d'objet appelé "Chemin piéton et cyclable". Cela fixe automatiquement les valeur que vous indiquez. 
La voie que vous indiquez est un chemin en beton, flanqué par une rue d'un coté, et par de l'herbe de l'autre sur une partie, puis des maisons ensuite.
J'avoue ne pas connaître encore bien les règles d'OSM, et suis preneur de tous les conseils qu'on peut m'apporter :) Je n'ai pas trouvé d'article sur le wiki décrivant les règles sur les voies vertes, mais si vous m'indiquez le chemin, je m'occupe des corrections appropriées dans les prochains jours.

Pascal
Aradrin (2019-08-30 04:52:01+00:00): Correction, c'est bien une voie verte, le panneau C115 est présent, je viens de vérifier :)
naomap (2019-08-30 07:33:00+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour la réponse.

La page du Wiki OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle décrit précisément comment cartographier les différents types d'aménagements cyclables, la section 1.13 traite des voies vertes.

En effet l'éditeur en ligne iD propose highway=cycleway pour "Chemin piéton et cyclable" : je pense qu'il y a un problème de traduction car ce tag désigne une piste "exclusivement ou principalement" dédiée aux cyclistes. Je mène l'enquête...

Bonne journée,
Antoine.
Carto'Cité (2019-09-09 10:18:30+00:00): Suite de l'enquête sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73969647
abrensch (2019-08-22 20:12:07+00:00): Hallo

dieses Stück Gudrunstrasse sieht nach Deiner Freigabe komisch aus, weil es ist ja nur ein Teil dieser merkwürdigen Schleife?


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484522832
znrgl (2019-09-03 13:22:46+00:00): Hey, ja, das ist passiert, weil ich StreetComplete verwendet habe, mit dem man eben beim Spazieren Gehen einzelne Abschnitte überprüft. Tut mir Leid – ich weiß auch nicht, wann ich in der Ecke das nächste Mal vorbei komme, und kann nur auf andere Leute dort hoffen.
H2172 (2020-08-18 12:28:06+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset, as you did a mass change on several nodes, of which for at least a few I have verified that "Operator" is incorrect. Please base your changes on a valid source, and avoid blind mass changes.
H2172 (2020-08-18 13:10:25+00:00): I've validated the drinking water points, and verified 8 of these are in fact operated by Oasen (5 others are not). I'm adding the "Operator=" tag back in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89577192

cheers!
dieterdreist (2019-11-15 12:26:26+00:00): Hi, you have added a lot of parts of the Vatican Museums as museum, for example the "Sala della biga", which in reality is part of the museum "Museo Pio Clementino", as is the "Galleria dei Candalabri" etc.
See here for reference: http://www.museivaticani.va/content/museivaticani/it/collezioni/musei/museo-pio-clementino/Galleria-dei-Candelabri.html
dieterdreist (2019-11-15 12:33:41+00:00): There is also the removal of this way: 214196250 which seems incorrect, although I am not completely sure. Can you explain why it was removed?
Generally, I would not say your edit was malicious of course, just that it seems incorrect tagging to use the tourism=museum tag for what essentially is just a room or part of a museum (in the case of Museo Pio Clementino)
alpenmurmeli (2019-11-16 10:25:42+00:00): feel free to retag or remove them but I think it would be helpful for visitors to know where these places are, as the map given at visit is not very clear.
Please explain why removal of 214196250 seems incorrect. Unfortunately openstreetmap does not indicate which one it was. If I knew which one it was, I could tell more. It might have been the way of the inner courtyard of "Fontana de Cortile" connected to the Galleria delle Carte geografiche. In this case it might be an issue of different levels in the building.
dieterdreist (2019-11-16 11:36:11+00:00): I agree that these are useful to map, but they aren’t museums, they are parts of museums. Maybe indoor mapping could represent them appropriately.
The way was probably on a different level, you can see it if you look at your changeset in OSMCha
alpenmurmeli (2019-11-30 09:44:50+00:00): way 214196250 has been restored by dieterdreist. Thank you!
maraf24 (2019-09-02 16:51:29+00:00): To bardzo nierozsądne bawić się reverterem, szczególnie przy granicach państwowych.