piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
evod (2018-07-13 19:57:13+00:00): Hallo Johannes, du hast bei Mauer Lange Gasse 98 (oder 100?) einige addr:housenumber gesetzt. Imho ist das nicht ganz richtig.

Besser wäre denke ich: die komplette Adresse ergänzen (also addr:street/city/country/... und addr:housenumber=98 (oder was korrekt ist) und addr:unit für die Stiege / Haus - was bisher als housnumber gesetzt ist.

LG :)
jogemu (2018-07-14 16:05:28+00:00): Hallo evod, die Adressen sind jetzt so, wie du sie mir Erklärt hast. Ich war mir nicht sicher, ob manche Navigationsprogramme von den units oder den mehrfachen Adressen verwirrt werden.
Danke für den Tipp
Changeset #60715124
evod (2018-07-16 20:18:10+00:00): Super! Ich denke verwirrt wird so kein Programm sein - vermutlich werden noch wenige Programme / Anwendungen die addr:unit unterstützen. Aber besser sie ignorieren das addr:unit, als das sie die Stiegen als Hausnummern interpretieren. LG!
eggie (2018-07-12 20:15:01+00:00): Je edit gebied is veel te groot. Door het schuiven met de kaart is schade ontstaan. Je verschuift adressen onbedoeld en ook kanaal , administratieve grens en weg geheel aan elkaar geplakt. 
Dit was je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60662226
Let svp op plakken. 
Zuidereinde 238 en 196 zijn ergens anders terecht te komen.
Advies. Niet schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus.
 Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-07-12 20:18:33+00:00): Adressen hersteld
ma-rt-in (2018-07-12 22:26:25+00:00): Hallo,
welchen Hintergrund hat deine Information?
viloan (2018-07-12 18:50:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
4004 (2018-07-14 23:59:06+00:00): если это по Я, то там часто кривые номера
Pavelfantik (2018-07-16 16:00:55+00:00): нумерация ставлю там где логично понятно. остальное позже проставлю после разведки на местности:)
4004 (2018-07-16 20:55:26+00:00): да, заранее точки проставлять удобнее
km2bp (2020-12-18 22:12:25+00:00): Very good job 👍 I also add photos to OSM look: 
https://images.mapillary.com/Fs7c90aPs2J1VUyEa74IGr/thumb-2048.jpg 
Greetings!
km2bp (2020-12-18 22:12:54+00:00): http://openpoimap.org/?map=various&zoom=18&lat=51.18015&lon=4.41355&layers=B00FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFF
km2bp (2020-12-18 22:14:07+00:00): Very good job 👍 I also add photos to OSM look:
http://openpoimap.org/?map=various&zoom=18&lat=51.18015&lon=4.41355&layers=B00FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFF
Greetings!
escada (2020-12-21 06:02:01+00:00): thanks. I've also made sure all artworks have a data item on wikidata, e.g. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q27615955
GerdP (2018-10-02 09:48:12+00:00): Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tags like highway="secondary;closed"
The normal tagging would be e.g. disused:highway=secondary
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
On the other hand, my understanding of the document at https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1017/8401/files/052318_Road_Closure_Notice_-_Update_1_for_Lakeshore_Line_-_05-23-2018_-_8-49_AM.pdf?13447116664219722629 is that parts of the road are only closed for public access but is still in use? So maybe highway=service now?
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-12 19:40:53+00:00): #test #failed

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60662886
user_5359 (2018-07-12 20:27:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
bxl-forever (2019-05-01 23:33:28+00:00): Hello,
Was this a test edit?  I don’t recall seeing trees acting as a block across the road.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2019-05-02 12:42:07+00:00): There are (or were) small trees in metal cases there which act as road blocks.
bxl-forever (2019-05-02 15:40:59+00:00): (In fact I thought it was a test because having node with a tree as part of a highway is quite unusual. :-))
You are right.  I surveyed the place today and found out those small palm trees are back.  I improved the geometry because they have been moved a bit.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-12 20:34:01+00:00): #test #failed

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset= 60663209
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-12 20:34:32+00:00): #test #failed

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset= 60663232
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
GinaroZ (2018-09-06 11:11:31+00:00): Is this definitely a path, given it leads to some buildings and there's no other way of getting there on the map? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318262068
tms13 (2018-10-01 19:52:11+00:00): It didn't appear to be a public road, and I don't remember seeing vehicular access from B9124.  Perhaps the access is from A9 Falkirk Road via the other "path"?  It's certainly possible that I made a mistake, because this was a drive-by survey.
GinaroZ (2018-10-01 22:33:33+00:00): It's an old photo but http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/273246 seems to indicate a track?
AndersAndersson (2018-07-18 17:56:45+00:00): Hello,
What where you trying to do?
You have added 102 empty nodes.

This changeset should be reverted.
Hjart (2018-07-20 16:32:37+00:00): I have reverted this
muralito (2018-07-12 21:30:49+00:00): Hola Guido.

Por favor ten en cuenta que actualmente se sugiere la etiqueta "source" como atributo del todo el changeset y no en cada elemento individual.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-13 12:03:03+00:00): #test #failed
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-13 12:03:09+00:00): #test #failed
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
eggie (2019-01-06 11:14:00+00:00): Ha Peter,
betreft:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.90499/4.83998

Dat oude  bruggetje is nu kennelijk afgebroken na bijna in elkaar gestort te zijn, want ik zie het niet meer op de PDOK 2018. 
De Pelgrimsroute loopt hier nu door het water. Er is een nieuw fietsbruggetje sinds een paar jaar van erbij in het verlengde van de Brandwijksedijk. 
Kun jij die wandelroutes omleggen over dat nieuwe bruggetje. 

MVG,
Eggie
Peter Elderson (2019-01-06 15:39:13+00:00): Akkoord. Ik had al een extra lusje gemaakt, dat zel ik nu als hoofdroute opnemen. De wijzigingentekst bij Wandelnet is vaag, maar het lijkt erop dat ze dit nu ook zo aanbevelen.
Peter Elderson (2019-01-06 15:49:48+00:00): GEDAAN
eggie (2019-01-06 16:47:56+00:00): Thanks.. Ik ben de hele boel hier aan het overhoop halen mbv de PDOK 2018. De Molenkade wordt aangepast (versteviging)en er is een nieuwe boezem aangelegd daar richting Groot-Ammers. Het zal nog moeten renderen. 
Ook mocht je er nooit wandelen of fietsen als de molens draaien. Dan krijg je de bekende klap... Dat zal nu wel verbeteren. 
Binnenkort maar eens kijken daar. 
Groet,
Eggie
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-13 12:03:25+00:00): #test #failed
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-13 12:03:37+00:00): #test #failed
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-13 12:06:34+00:00): Please revert your latest changests!
For your tests, you should not use the main OSM database.
viloan (2018-07-12 20:02:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-07-12 21:15:32+00:00): I definitely should have done the landuse=residential overhaul separately from the gardening and weeds patrol. Also, this one a bit too much to swallow in one go. I'm glad it is done - now let's check quality !
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:48:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
freebeer (2018-11-30 14:49:32+00:00): 'Allo,

you have added a short unconnected primary highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607487715 over top of a waterway here.

can you fix this?

also, it looks like the building outlines you are drawing have not been given right angles.  your editor should have an easy way to do this, and the resulting map will look much better.

thanks!
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
eggie (2018-07-12 21:03:44+00:00): Er staan hier wel degelijk bomen... Je zou die bomen ook op nodes kunne mappen met natural=tree. Ik heb een boom als voorbeeld gemapt. Een reactie wordt op prijs gesteld.
Jepke (2018-07-12 21:27:21+00:00): Reactie op de nieuwe edit achtergelaten denk ik.
Chris Fleming (2018-07-24 10:25:46+00:00): Hi - I can see that you requested a review of this edit. Sorry about the delay. I've made a small additional change, which is setting the shop to disused:shop - that way we can keep the node and update it with any new tenant when they move in.

Let me know if you have any questions, cheers
Chris
crommr (2018-07-24 12:51:31+00:00): Hi Chris,
thanks for the review.
keujfl839237 (2019-02-07 16:54:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention : on n'a pas la permission d'utiliser des dates du " Guichet cartographique cantonal de l'Etat de Vaud " sur OpenStreetMap ! C'est une violation du droit d'auteur ! Voir <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright> et <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Datasources>.

Merci pour ta compréhension.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:37:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2018-07-13 04:46:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Not the whole area is a raceway and has the surface=asphalt.
Shagnuss332 (2018-07-13 10:56:52+00:00): That whole property is owned by the racetrack it includes parking and the pit area etc. it’s just like a park you don’t just outline the grass. Also it’s an asphalt track for racing not dirt you have to specify the track so people know what races there.
user_5359 (2018-07-13 13:22:45+00:00): Please read the link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Draceway. According to your tagging, the cars drive around the outer edge of the property.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
kartonage (2018-07-15 08:09:01+00:00): Hallo Hoeckie,

hier gibt es jetzt ein Gebäude mit der Adresse Meiereiweg 2 in dem Gebäude mit der Adresse Meiereiweg 2a. Magst du nochmal drüber schauen?
.
Mir ist außerdem aufgefallen, dass du eine ganze Reihe an Gebäuden ohne Gebäudeeigenschaften gezeichnet hast. Die haben nur "area=yes". Ein Versehen oder mit Absicht? Ich hab leider schon öfter mal gesehen, dass sowas dann eine lange Zeit so blieb. Ist dann manchmal schwer zu erahnen ob hier wirklich noch Gebäude fehlen.
Und falls du es noch nicht wusstest, wenn du in iD ein Gebäude ausgewählt hast, kannst du es mit "s" rechteckig machen. 
.
Falls du auch noch mehr Lust auf OSM hast, kann ich dir auch dieses wunderbare Tutorial ans Herz legen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf 

Schöne Grüße
Hoeckie (2018-07-15 14:58:06+00:00): Danke für die Tips als Rookie kann man soetwas gebrauchen.
Das wohnhau würde abgerissen in ein Mehrfamilienhaus hingestellt.
Ich wohne nebenan ;-)) 
Ich werde mir das Tutorial mal anschauen 
Vielen Dank
kartonage (2018-07-16 15:47:35+00:00): Okay, also wenn das Wohnhaus physisch noch besteht, dann wäre es trotzdem nur ein Teil des neu gebauten Gebäudes (das wäre bei OSM dann ein building:part=*). Wenn es aber einfach abgerissen wurde und das neue Haus dort entstanden ist + Aufteilung der Adresse in a und b, dann kann es auch einfach gelöscht werden. Darauf aufmerksam bin ich nur geworden weil die zwei Gebäude ineinander einen Fehler auswerfen (Überschneidende Gebäude quasi).
Da du vor Ort bist, weißt du natürlich besser als ich wie man das löst. (Eilt auch nicht.)

Falls du Fragen hast, kannst du natürlich auch gern fragen. Also ganz allgemein. :)
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
viloan (2018-07-12 21:06:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Jepke (2018-07-12 21:13:37+00:00): Zo bedoel je?
eggie (2018-07-12 21:57:20+00:00): Helemaal prima!
viloan (2018-07-12 21:15:14+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-22 16:38:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2018-07-13 04:43:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
d_berger (2018-07-12 21:45:10+00:00): Welcome to Zürich. Please check the existing map, your software, your sense of orientation, and your eyes. We have Open Government Data in Zürich, and all three Fountains at Beckenhof-Park are mapped. And I surveyed 85% of the city in the last 12 months, just to make sure they didn't mess up anything. Duplicate removed. Thank you for your understanding.
MiBu (2018-07-13 06:54:21+00:00): Hello, d_berger. There is a 4th fountain, just behind the one 587.1 (which is the big circular one); I have been there this week. The 4th one is directly at Stampfenbachstrassse (but inside the fenced area of Beckenhof), where I put it on the map. For whatever reason it is also missing on the official government map of WVZ, which is why I wasn't sure whether it is a drinking water fountain or not. I can send you a picture of both fountains. Since it is not a duplicate, pls put it back on the map.
d_berger (2018-07-13 10:06:55+00:00): Another mapping nightmare. Technically that's the same fountain as 587.1, but I'm not sure if there is a separate drinking water pipe from valve 587.1, or if it's just the drain water. Hopefully I'll have a look at this later today, I'll reconsider it then.
MiBu (2018-07-13 11:25:10+00:00): Ist das wirklich so, dass beide zusammen gehören? Der obere ist ein grosser Springbrunnen, wo hingegen der untere (der mit dem Sonnenkopf), nur der Abfluss ist? In dem Fall würde ich ihn nicht als Trinkwasserbrunnen bezeichnen, aber irgendwie sollte man ihn auf der Karte darstellen. Er ist eigentlich auch nur von der Stampfenbachstrasse aus zugänglich.
d_berger (2018-07-13 15:35:05+00:00): War schon kürzlich am Überlegen, wie man eigentlich einen Brauchwasser-Brunnen taggt. 'amenity=drinking_water' mit 'drinking_water=no' ist ein Widerspruch in sich. Sogar 'amenity=water_point' impliziert Trinkwasser. Am ehesten tendiere ich grad dazu, dies als 'artwork' zu erfassen. Siehe dazu auch note 1453047 im Friedhof Sihlfeld...
MiBu (2018-07-13 19:05:44+00:00): Deinen Vorschlag mit "artwork" finde ich gut. Ist wahrscheinlich der beste Kompromiss.
d_berger (2018-07-14 14:49:57+00:00): Beim Durchlesen der 'Kunst im Stadtraum' Beschreibung ist, scheint wohl mehr der Speier beschrieben zu sein, als der Springbrunnen. Die seltsame Lage im Park hängt wohl auch damit zusammen, dass der Park einst bis zur Limmat reichte; die Stampfenbachstrasse wurde dann um 1865 mitten durchgewalzt. Wie viel am Brunnen verändert wurde, weiss offenbar niemand so richtig; klar ist nur dass für die WVZ beide Teile die Brunnenanlage 587.1 bilden. Evtl. liegt es an den Bauarbeiten, aber der Speier war ausser Betrieb. Da passt dann 'artwork' definitiv besser als 'drinking_water' ;-)


http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60713453
mavl (2018-07-23 07:55:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
lakedistrict (2018-07-13 21:32:28+00:00): Hi vorsignal, thanks for these edits. Can you explain why you have added access tags to the roads in Grasmere, eg on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43617587 ? As far as I'm aware there's no access restrictions on these roads. Thanks :)
vorsignal (2018-07-14 07:50:24+00:00): Hi,
I've been there four days ago on vacation. There is one traffic sign at the southern entrance to the village just between the primary school and the Car & Coach Park and another one at the bus stop "The Swan Hotel" in direction of Grasmere. As far as I could remember yesterday the restriction means "no motor vehicles, except buses and for access". But now I remember that there is a coach on the traffic signs (and Google Street View also confirms that). Now I don't really know how to understand that because buses are prohibited except buses? Maybe you know what that means. Anyway, I am going to undo that. Sorry for that mistake!
lakedistrict (2018-07-14 10:16:46+00:00): I've had a look and that road sign really doesn't make any sense - "no buses except buses" - "no coaches except for local buses" would make more sense but that's not what the sign says. Thanks for the corrections and I hope that you enjoyed your holiday. :)
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-07-13 08:50:22+00:00): Qu'est-ce que je raconte... 2015, pas 1995 !
Alecs01 (2018-07-13 17:37:23+00:00): Ciao, se ti ricapita, ricordati di cancellare il tag, o aggiungere un prefisso disused:*, ma non cancellare il numero civico, quello comunque continua ad esistere
realjep (2018-07-13 22:18:51+00:00): Ciao grazie per l'informazione! 
In quel caso avrei dovuto rimuovere tutto tranne il numero civico?
Alecs01 (2018-07-14 13:02:47+00:00): Direi di sì per non "perdere" il numero civico, anche se in questo caso mi sono accorto ora che c'è già comunque, l'ingresso principale del palazzo è un'altro: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4092138165
user_5359 (2018-07-13 04:42:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
mavl (2018-07-23 07:55:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
Glassman (2018-07-12 23:06:18+00:00): Did you mean to name the campsite t107?
mavl (2018-07-23 07:55:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
user_5359 (2018-07-13 04:37:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
user_5359 (2018-07-13 04:29:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t paint a way twice. If there is a dead end, then start a new path.