piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
artem78 (2022-08-18 09:28:03+00:00): День добрый!

Посоветовался по данному вопросу на форуме, мнения разделились: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=869714#p869714

Лично я думаю, что можно оставить ваши правки, но нужно будет исправить два момента:
1) Автобусные маршруты вывести на новые съезды
2) Разделить Жилинскую улицу на 2 линии от Стекловолокна, т.к. там тоже есть разделитель (в виде тросов)

Если хотите, можете сделать сами либо я добавлю, когда будет время.
Guzalia (2022-08-18 09:34:16+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо! Если у Вас есть возможность, добавьте, пожалуйста, сами, поскольку с правилами указания маршрутов я не знакома.
artem78 (2022-08-18 09:35:29+00:00): Хорошо.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 10:33:58+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124774347, 124774586, 124774646, 124774732, 124774842, 124774898, 124775008, 124775072, 124775136, 124775211, 124775323, 124775390, 124775448, 124775564, 124775699, 124775761, 124775804, 124775880, 124775951, 124776006, 124776050, 124776193, 124776245, 124776352, 124776442, 124776495, 124776543, 124776591, 124776708, 124776774, 124776881, 124776993, 124777045, 124777091, 124777147, 124777311, 124777354, 124777452, 124777514, 124777599, 124777657, 124777703, 124777761, 124777832, 124777869, 124777935, 124777996, 124778063, 124778134, 124778212, 124778273, 124778324, 124778436, 124778488, 124778588, 124778703, 124778818, 124778924, 124779032, 124779101, 124779143, 124779200, 124779256, 124779311, 124779395, 124779463, 124779575, 124779640, 124779810, 124779966, 124780054, 124780090, 124780127, 124780176, 124780240, 124780300, 124780348, 124780399, 124780456, 124780534, 124780659, 124780899, 124780950, 124781015, 124781259, 124781322.
Frans S (2022-09-26 14:35:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Please waste no time to map a few pieces of farmland. Just focus on mapping of buildings.
Best regards



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124812431
bxl-forever (2022-08-12 23:08:11+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.
There seems to be a problem with the way you are using your app (it looks like you are using Organic Maps): every time you create a point you fill the name in one language (in this case you filled the French translation of the name) instead of writing it where you can give the name to be used in every language.

As a consequence, this bakery was created as "this bakery as no name; translation in French is Aroma".  Well, I fixed this one and am busy cleaning up your other edits.

I think Organic Maps does like this: in the "Name of the place" block, ignore the empty fields with languages and click on "Add a language", then scroll to the last entry "Native for each country" and type the name there and nowhere else.
There might be an easier way, I don’t know, but at least it will prevent you from filling the map with invalid data like here.

Happy mapping.
mapko (2022-10-05 18:49:52+00:00): You are not right. There is no document, contract, or promise that anything will be built by 2025. Please roll back all changes, including the deleted road that may be built in 2050. Well thank you.
aceman444 (2022-10-05 19:41:11+00:00): And the source for the changes was what? You did not provide any.
mapko (2022-10-08 10:10:21+00:00): 4KK, zmazal si vsetky kluce a hodnoty. takto sa mapa neupravuje! prosim nastuduj si pravidla https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:WikiProjekt_Slovensko#Proces_tvorby_m%C3%A1p_na_OpenStreetMap
user_2066394 (2022-08-16 00:34:42+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/193020402
Den kann man nicht mehr brauchen?
baum10 (2022-08-16 14:29:37+00:00): Hallo wurzelast , was meinst du mit. (Den kann man nicht mehr brauchen)
lg.
user_2066394 (2022-08-16 15:08:53+00:00): Warum? Wurde da umgebaut?
user_2066394 (2022-08-16 15:27:45+00:00): Da fehlt ein "Warum gelöscht"
baum10 (2022-08-17 13:33:30+00:00): Hallo
Für mich hat dieser Kreis laut Luftbild keinen sinn ergeben.
Ich habe versucht es über JOSM mit der Kennung 193020402 zurück zu setzen. Es hat aber  leider nicht Funktioniert.
lg
user_2066394 (2022-08-17 15:14:28+00:00): Symbolisiert wohl die Wendemöglichkeit vor Ort. Wäre jetzt nicht komplett abwegig.
baum10 (2022-08-17 18:39:01+00:00): Mit JOSM hat das wiederherstellen nicht Funktioniert. Ich werde es Morgen neu Einzeichnen.
lg.
user_2066394 (2022-08-17 20:09:11+00:00): Ist wieder da
baum10 (2022-08-18 03:10:57+00:00): Hallo wurzelast.
Danke
lg
snoozingnewt (2022-08-13 03:39:07+00:00): No idea if this will reach you but don't make diary entries like that, it's considered spam
user_12500175 (2022-08-12 11:37:51+00:00): Hallo, 
du hast bei den Öffnungszeiten zweimal den Dienstag drinnen
chris9734 (2022-08-12 11:41:55+00:00): Ah danke, gerade korrigiert.
mcliquid (2022-08-15 13:54:09+00:00): Hi, could you re-check your changes for this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316213622
Seems like the oneway is in the wrong direction, isn't it? Thanks!
user_10901495 (2022-08-15 19:38:40+00:00): Yeah, you're right.
My bad.
mcliquid (2022-08-15 19:57:50+00:00): Thanks for fixing it! Appreciate it.
GartenStuhl (2022-08-18 05:23:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085798473
seems to be wrong also. i'm not from there :)
user_10901495 (2022-08-18 09:05:59+00:00): Right, just fixed :)
eggie (2022-08-12 11:37:27+00:00): You are deleting again the addressnode from the Dutch Registry.
We asked again and again please don't
Greetz
eggie
eggie (2022-08-12 11:39:03+00:00): reverted by changeset #124814877
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-12 17:04:37+00:00): porque excluiu a via aqui? por mais q seja privada, era só marcar como privada
arqmfzanela (2022-08-12 17:16:52+00:00): Para evitar confusão em rotas e deslocamentos por GPS. Pois existindo a via, dependendo do programa/aplicativo, poderia ser considerada.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-31 23:34:56+00:00): refeito
RicoElectrico (2022-08-12 11:59:30+00:00): Hej, sklep wciąż tu jest zaznaczony, jedynie skasowana została nazwa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268844772/history

Otwórz "wszystkie znaczniki" i skasuj shop=convenience.
silversurfer83 (2022-08-16 13:45:04+00:00): Moinsen :)
Kleine Bitte: Wenn du mit StreetComplete arbeitest, versuch bitte daran zu denken deine Änderungen hochzuladen, bevor du die Stadt wechselst. Sonst entstehen sehr große Kisten um deine Änderungen und das macht es vielen Usern unnötig schwer, die versuchen ihre Umgebung ein wenig zu beobachten :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

-silversurfer83
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
Tomas_J (2025-01-03 07:00:58+00:00): Obecný název (Monument) se nedává do name. Prosím, oprav podle dokumentace. Dík.
Tomas_J (2025-01-03 07:24:46+00:00): ...tady taky - obecný název nepatří do tagu name.  Možná do description...? Name je oficiální jméno prvku, ne obecný popis. Pokud mozno, oprav, prosím . Dík.
itchybellybutton (2022-08-12 22:03:59+00:00): Hey, there's already a "Waldmops" nearby. Could it be that you mean this one? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3928562166
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 11:56:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124481516, 124481637, 124481700, 124481774, 124481818, 124563408, 124563491, 124563537, 124563580, 124563608, 124563644, 124563671, 124563709, 124563769, 124563815, 124613589, 124613648, 124613707, 124613742, 124613786, 124613907, 124613957, 124613991, 124614011, 124614045, 124614075, 124730208, 124730277, 124730373, 124730471, 124730519, 124730571, 124730618, 124730655, 124730704, 124730741, 124730790, 124775683, 124775750, 124775807, 124775867, 124775927, 124775963, 124776021, 124776051, 124776099, 124776154.
Elian D (2023-10-03 16:07:47+00:00): @gisbihor, some of the nodes such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9949195354 have a "null" value for "fire_hydrant:position" and "fire_hydrant:pressure". Is this normal?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 12:04:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124526368, 124526394, 124526417, 124526454, 124526484, 124526515, 124526553, 124526602, 124526633, 124526657, 124526687, 124526704, 124526727, 124526770, 124526794, 124563062, 124563100, 124563167, 124563208, 124563232, 124728912, 124728953, 124728998, 124729058, 124729106, 124729722, 124729763, 124729795, 124729841, 124729873, 124729906, 124729934, 124729977, 124730005, 124730030, 124730060, 124730098, 124730120, 124730162, 124730201, 124775192, 124775223, 124775270, 124775289, 124775321.
Gustavo22Soares (2022-09-03 13:39:57+00:00): pfvr quando add um numero de telefone ponha o ddd
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
RaphaelPasloin_mobile (2022-08-12 12:43:18+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RQvC-Z3afGkmXRgh1uFQ9wWrqHPa2LUl/view?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RMJtojzqye-Xo8dpCmp-NxCg6-gJnmhI/view?usp=drivesdk
bxl-forever (2022-08-13 00:02:02+00:00): (I think this discussion should have been inserted on the reverted changeset which resulted into having two restaurants with the same name, not under this one.)

That being said, I also went to have a look earlier today.  I think I found the source of the confusion: on their website they claim to be located on number 13.  But they recently expanded and took over the restaurant next door and they now spread over two buildings, while their official address is still number 13.

In addition, there were problems with the geometry of buildings, which came from an earlier import of UrbIS data.  I tried to fix as much as I could.
trigpoint (2022-09-02 17:03:25+00:00): What does #waymap-project-SB  mean?
rskedgell (2023-01-17 08:27:36+00:00): @trigpoint Did you ever get an answer?
trigpoint (2023-01-17 11:18:03+00:00): @rskedgell 
I never got a response
rskedgell (2023-01-19 08:08:34+00:00): According to the local authority, the part of Norland Road (w606519484) changed from cycleway->footway is "a pedestrian and cycle zone".

The Kensington and Chelsea (Prescribed Routes) (No. 2) Traffic Order 2022
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4027262
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124816262
mini-me (2022-08-13 17:39:01+00:00): Пожалуйста, не "приклеивайте" газоны к дорогам и тротуарам
Redactor_47 (2022-08-14 00:47:45+00:00): Здравствуйте! Постараюсь.
MxxCon (2022-08-16 01:10:21+00:00): Hell.
This edit is invalid. It breaks the format of opening_hours= tag as documented as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124816340
Molker (2023-06-16 19:59:40+00:00): Hello Frederik Ramm, I just noticed that you deleted in changeset 124816366 remove historic motorway construction on Aug 12th. I am pretty sure you know how much work it is to map such topic, so I do not understand why you did it  - even without a discussion. Historic entries which are not seen in reality are totally hidden in OSM, but if someone wants to find them, they are there. So, where is the harm? It cannot be that a system cannot coop with it, or that it is destructing someone. I believe it is just because of the rules ... It makes me sick. So, please, even if you are a well respected member of OSM, please just do not destroy other-one's work without talking. Have a nice day, Volker
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124816366
woodpeck (2023-06-16 20:50:18+00:00): Hallo Volker, ja es ist tatsächlich "nur wegen der Regeln" - wenn man dem einen erlaubt, historische Autobahnen zu mappen, mappt der nächste historische Eisenbahnen und der dritte historische Gebäude. Das stört aber die Erfassung der Gegenwart - wenn im Editor da plötzlich lauter konfuse Linien auftauchen, die ja alle "nur historisch" sind. Ist ist also tatsächlich so, dass unser System dafür nicht ausgelegt ist und damit nicht umgehen kann. Wir mappen das, was man vor Ort sieht - und sonst, von wenigen Ausnahmen abgesehen, nichts. Wenn also irgendwelche Pfeiler oder Brückenbauwerke oder sonst was von einer historischen Autobahnplanung übrig sind, kann man die einzeichnen, aber für reine "Pläne", von denen in der Natur nichts sichtbar ist, haben wir keinen Platz. Sowas müsstest Du entweder bei "openhistoricalmap.org" einpflegen, oder Du erstellst eine private Karte auf umap.openstreetmap.de.
Molker (2023-06-19 06:26:19+00:00): Hello Frederik, thanks for the tip with the umap.openstreetmap.de! I tried openhistoricalmap.org before and the rendering does not really work well. Still, I am still not happy about the deleting action without interacting with the mapper. Any, I cannot bring it back, I need to research again. Cheers, Volker
Rainero (2022-09-15 15:47:08+00:00): Bonjour Oeliette,

merci pour ajouter les maisons qui manquent encore.  
Si tu veux le faire un peu plus beau, il y a une fonction utile, le bouton q, qui redresse les bâtiments à angle droit.

Cordialement,
Rainer
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
josmougn (2022-09-19 23:56:06+00:00): bonjour, tant que les routes démolies ou bloquées par les travaux sont visibles sur le cadastre ou sur les photos aériennes IGN c'est pas mal de les garder avec le prefixe disused: ou demolished:
Ca évite la tentation de les remettre en se basant sur une des 2 sources citées.
Cordialement
JeroenHoek (2022-08-12 13:24:58+00:00): Ik vroeg me bij het intekenen van dit stukje al af of het een vogelkijkhut was.
george1201 (2024-12-05 16:55:44+00:00): Hallo,
mit den zwei Ways sind jetzt zwei Hundeparks eingetragen. Welcher ist der Richtige?
B-Rabbit (2024-12-06 08:40:19+00:00): Hallo,
leider sind beide richtig. Der Äußere ist die offene Hundeauslauffläche, der Innere ist eine eingezäunte Fläche die erst später eingerichtet wurde. Bin mir gerade nicht sicher wie man das schön erfassen kann. Vielleicht ein Multipolygon mit inner und outer?
george1201 (2024-12-06 13:54:53+00:00): Wenn die eine Fläche als Inner eines Multipolygon angesehen werden würde, dann würde diese Fläche ja aus der umschließenden größeren Fläche herausgeschnitten werden. Ich würde stattdessen sagen, dass die umzäunte Fläche ebenfalls ein Teil des großen Hundeparks ist. Es gibt dort nur einen Park, das ist kein neuer, der über oder unter dem anderen liegt. Der Way w1085822318 ist vielmehr ein Zaun innerhalb der größeren Fläche w313538301. Deswegen würde ich bei ihm einfach das Tag leisure=dog_park entfernen. Die anderen Attribute können dran bleiben.
B-Rabbit (2024-12-08 17:14:59+00:00): Gute Idee. Habe es so wie vorgeschlagen hier umgesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160064330
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124843234 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
highflyer74 (2024-06-13 08:38:00+00:00): Hallo!

Danke für Deinen Beitrag! Bitte beachte, dass Namen in OSM nur für Objekte vergeben werden, die auch wirklich einen Namen haben. Beispielsweise hat ein Mülleimer nicht den Namen "Mülleimer". Dass es sich um einen Mülleimer handelt, ist bereits durch das entsprechende Attribut (in OSM Tag genannt) klar.

Danke, dass Du bei weiteren Bearbeitungen daran denkst :-)

Viele Grüße!
kepivar (2022-08-12 14:22:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
martin_ferrari85 (2022-08-12 19:11:26+00:00): OK understood
abakus_uploader (2022-08-12 22:30:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-12 22:31:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
invalidCards (2022-08-12 14:30:59+00:00): This meant to say changeset 124681438 instead of revision 120798412.
orthocircular (2022-08-12 17:38:11+00:00): Hey there, a handful of these "buildings" are in the lake and might be piers, might be worth double checking.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124821415
jmarchon (2022-08-13 06:02:36+00:00): The lake outline is in the wrong place, not the buildings. I just haven't gotten around to fixing it yet.
richlv (2024-03-19 19:51:27+00:00): Šis changeset pielika access=destination Robežu ielai.

Lai gan tāda zīme tiešām ir bijusi no Berģu ielas puses (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1354590711590301), tāda nav manāma no otras puses. Zīmes novietojums priekšā citai zīmei mazliet mudina domāt, ka tā varētu būt pašdarbība...

Tas gan ir Garkalnes pagasts, kur vispār laikam ceļazīmes var likt jebkurš, kuram ir nauda stabam un zīmei.
HellMap (2024-03-19 20:00:51+00:00): Tīri pareizi būtu `vehicle:direction=destination`. Pašdarbība jau drošvien ir, bet ko darīt... Tu piedāvā ņemt nost?
richlv (2024-03-19 20:05:59+00:00): Nu es nezinu - no otras puses tādu zīmju nav, un tas arī nav pareizi.
Tā jau ir ar šķībām zīmēm, nevar statusu nemaz normāli reģistrēt.

Paskatījos, tādu zīmju nav no Līgo/Jaunības/Akmeņu ielu puses.

Varētu jau jautāt pašvaldībai, bet par tām visām šķībajām dzīvojamo zonu zīmēm nav ne atbildes, ne kas labots - diezgan zema uzticība šai pašvaldībai, ja tā godīgi.
HellMap (2024-03-19 20:19:02+00:00): Zīmēm jau principā nav jābūt simetriskām. Te gan protams prasītos otrā pusē loģiski domājot tās zīmes jēgu - nebraukāt cauri. Dēļ šitādiem stulbiem gadījumiem bieži sanāk ielikt pēc zīmes kaut kādu ierobežojumu, bet faktiski tas bija tikai no vienas puses. Šeit es arī tā ieliku, kad te pa Upesciema ielu dzīvojamās zonas skatījos (pareizi gan vajadzēja `vehicle` nevis `access`).

Uz pašvaldību necerētu, īpaši šitādos rajonos. Te vēl tā zīme teorētiski Rīgā...
richlv (2024-03-19 20:24:46+00:00): Zin, izskatās padsmit cm ārā no Rīgas :)
kwiatek_123 (2022-08-12 19:04:59+00:00): Warto napisać w changesecie co się zmieniło.
Kinga_Adamska (2022-08-13 07:23:52+00:00): Dobra, dzięki za info dopiero się uczę na pewno to zrobię w wolnej chwili
trial (2025-12-22 15:19:44+00:00): Bonjour, selon https://www.baiedequiberon.bzh/napoleon-express-le-train-touristique-entre-auray-et-pontivy, et c'est logique, le train ne part par en dehors d'une gare mais de la gare d'Auray... ou de Lambel-Carmors de https://www.gar-pondi.bzh/blog/train-touristique/.
https://www.cfcb.bzh/train-napol%C3%A9on-express/dates-horaires/ confirme Auray.
literan (2022-08-12 16:06:58+00:00): правильный тег crossing=uncontrolled

в России все переходы marked, в отличии от Британии
seriych (2022-08-12 20:37:54+00:00): Я руководствовался этим: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing=marked  "crossing=marked should be used on highway=footway footway=crossing ways or highway=crossing nodes in place of crossing=zebra or crossing=uncontrolled to indicate a marked pedestrian crossing."
seriych (2022-08-12 20:43:32+00:00): Хотя только сейчас заметил, что эта статья - это всего лишь предложение: "Proposal status:	Proposed (under way)". Так что всё верно, должно быть crossing=uncontrolled, спасибо
literan (2022-08-12 20:53:45+00:00): здесь есть о российских особенностях:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing
felipeeugenio (2022-08-14 17:04:09+00:00): Hola. Ya no existen esos pasos?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124822857
mackbeth (2022-08-16 12:45:54+00:00): No. Todos esos pasos fueron cerrados de manera definitiva