piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chillly (2017-04-11 16:10:47+00:00): The UK Motorhomes website is copyright - it says so on the home page. You cannot use copyright sources without written permission that is compatible with the OSM licence. Do you have that? If not this edit will have to be deleted. We MUST be super careful about the sources we use. Please reply.
DD1GJ (2017-04-08 12:19:01+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-08-18 09:14:01+00:00): user:"Simon BANDAGNY" and type:way and untagged ... Ways:198. Je les ai corrigés, - s'il te plaît prends garde à ne pas oublier le building=yes sur tes bâtiments. Le validateur de JOSM est indispensable avant de soumettre. Pour dessiner sans être ralenti par l'étiquetage, fais le à la fin en sélectionnant 'new and type:way and untagged' auxquels tu pourras ajouter building=yes !
literan (2017-04-08 11:29:00+00:00): не надо вандалить
Cascafico (2017-04-08 11:34:40+00:00): Ciao... e benvenuto in OSM! 

Sei sicuro che si tratti di musei? Dalle foto aeree non vedo nemmeno un edificio...

Questo è un museo:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:tourism%3Dmuseum

Se vuoi fare una trincea, prendi spunto da questa:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481795607
Deamicri (2017-04-08 19:13:42+00:00): Parco Museale all'aperto
muralito (2017-04-08 13:24:06+00:00): Carlos:

Me parece que estas confundiendo marcadores personales con puntos de interes general y publicos, o capaz que el MAPS:ME no aclara cual es cual.

La casa del abuelo parece ser algo privado tuyp.
mueschel (2017-04-12 10:36:21+00:00): Hi, could you check the tagging of these 3 rivers? 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485498407
The tag "Barranco del Pico = Rio Nuerna" looks a bit strange.
Jan
dalop (2017-04-12 11:44:39+00:00): Thanks for the advise, It was my mistake! I just fixed that now
Athalis (2017-04-08 16:02:46+00:00): Hi, verläuft der Bannholzgraben auf den ganzen 2.7 km unterirdisch? Nur dann wäre layer=-1 angebracht und es müsste dann jedoch noch ein tunnel=* hinzu. Ansonsten ist es wohl eher so dass die Brücke der Sell-Schneise layer=1 bekommen sollte?
acsd (2017-04-08 13:02:10+00:00): Не надо удалять линию реки (waterway=river), там где нарисован берег реки (natural=water)
eggie (2017-04-08 12:36:35+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-08 12:38:46+00:00): Het bijgaan commentaar kan ik niet thuisbrengen. Daardoor is het niet duidelijk wat je hier wilde doen. Beginnende mappers worden gevolgd. Graag voorzichtig met de kaart.
Commodoortje (2017-04-08 17:25:36+00:00): De broken weblink is gecorrigeerd naar een werkende.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-08-18 09:16:46+00:00): Attention à ne pas attacher les bâtiments à la voirie.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-05-23 09:41:07+00:00): Bonjour...

"landuse=farmland" avec "name=batiment résidentiel" me semble erroné... Un simple  building=apartments ou  building=house aurait suffit. En attendant j'y met building=yes

Concernant le polygone "landuse=farmland" avec "name=terrain", il ne s'agit manifestement pas de terre agricole... Si c'est un terrain vague, alors landuse=bronwfield sera approprié. Si c'est un terrain libre tel que ceux où les gamins jouent au foot, alors un leisure=common sera bien avec surface=ground. Vu les véhicules garés, ce pourrait aussi être un amenity=parking avec surface=ground... Je te laisse donc le corriger.

Attention aussi à aligner la forme des bâtiments sur la base du bâtiment et non sur son toit: le satellite ne prends pas les vues à la verticale et la perspective décale donc le toit par rapport à sa position réelle.

Je suis à ta disposition si tu as des questions.
eggie (2017-04-08 12:51:39+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-08 12:54:47+00:00): merged with bag addressnode.. otherwise duplicate address
King Euro (2019-10-11 14:41:19+00:00): Ich finde nichts dazu, dass es nicht erlaubt wäre mit Kanus oder ähnlichem Sportgerät auf dem See unterwegs zu sein. Im Gegenteil: Dort sind regelmäßig Windsurfer aktiv.
King Euro (2019-10-14 06:27:44+00:00): Habe jetzt verschiedenes (analoges) Kartenmaterial gefunden, dass den See auch für Kanus&Co. als gesperrt ausweist.
glibbertorsten (2019-10-14 06:37:20+00:00): Hallo! Danke für deine Recherche. Als ich den See als gesperrt markiert habe, war das zu der Zeit, als es Ärger gab mit dem Fischer, an den der See verpachtet ist. Meines Wissens nach darf aber auf jeden Fall mit Kanus und Paddelbooten der See befahren werden. Definitiv verboten sind Motorboote.
glibbertorsten (2019-10-14 06:41:26+00:00): Hab mal gemappt
glibbertorsten (2019-10-14 06:43:35+00:00): Welche Karten hast du gefunden?
King Euro (2019-10-14 20:21:14+00:00): https://potsdamer-brandenburger-havelseen.de/de/kanu.html?file=tl_files/content/karten_Folder_downloads/WWK_havelseen_WEB.pdf
Auf dieser Karte wird an dem unteren "Zaun" ein "Durchfahrt verboten"-Schild gezeigt. Das viereckige, nicht das runde. Würde also auch Paddler einschließen. Dieses ist in echt nicht vorhanden. Dass die Durchfahrt dort verboten ist, ist durchaus möglich. Das sagt allerdings leider nichts darüber aus, ob man den See ansich bepaddeln darf.

Außerdem habe ich noch eine "Rad-, Wander-, Gewässerkarte" ("Havelseen 4") von "grünes herz" von 2015, welche den gesamten See als "Für Motor- und Sportboote gesperrt" ausweist. Allerdings sagt das ja nichts über Kanus aus.

Als letztes habe ich noch Info-Material vom Landestourismusverband Brandenburg e.V., bei dem wieder das (vor Ort nicht vorhandene) "Durchfahrt verboten"-Schild zu sehen ist. Aus dem Kartenstil lässt sich vermuten, dass die gleiche Informationsquelle wie eingangs erwähnt genutzt wurde.
glibbertorsten (2019-10-15 10:00:31+00:00): Es mag vielleicht kein Schild vom Kanal aus sichtbar sein, aber zugeschlossen ist trotzdem vom Fischer.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 12:42:22+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you mapped as shop=internet in this edit ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)

It is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4782885852/history
Gregory Williams (2023-03-22 12:59:29+00:00): As I recall it, it's a shop front for a local Internet provider that offered Internet access to slightly more remote areas via a microwave link. Although I'm in the UK, as it happens I should be visiting this area in a few weeks' time. I'll try to remember to go and check then -- I've no idea whether it's even still open or located at these premises now, for example.
Gregory Williams (2023-04-06 16:32:00+00:00): Definitely an ISP. Changed name since. I've updated the name and improved the tagging. I can't see a clear tagging option for this on the wiki, so have gone for office=internet_provider based upon current usage in taginfo
BharataHS (2017-04-10 09:26:54+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing to open data. In this changeset, I observed that you have added a `leisure=park` in a residential area. Would you please provide a verifiable source to verify this? This seems to be a fictional park when inspected over different imageries. These edits are considered as harmful and I am reverting this edit. Please be careful for your further edits and add only those features which exists in reality. 

Thank you
trigpoint (2017-04-08 13:23:51+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution however the tagging appears to have gone a little wrong, it is easy for newcomers to make these mistakes.
You have said you have mapped a wood, and I can see a wood exists however you have mistakenly tagged it as a park. Would you correct that? Also the name looks odd too, according to OS Opendata the wood is called Lower Helsdale Wood.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Владимир К (2017-04-10 07:09:29+00:00): Wow, large polygons. You should use multipolygon relations instead, because they need less lines, lines will not cover above each other. And it is the only true way to make "holes" in polygons. Check out  this page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
user_5234693 (2017-04-10 09:48:28+00:00): Thanks for the info! I'll learn
eggie (2017-04-08 18:27:20+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-08 18:30:00+00:00): Die brandgangen zet ik zelf op access=private anders gaan ze in de gps en routeplanners ongewenst routeren. Zeker als het als path (juist)  is getagd.
eggie (2017-04-08 18:35:39+00:00): access=private toegevoegd. In het begin volgen wij de edits van startende mappers... ook om te helpen.
Prima edits zo. Of alle brandgangen getmapt moeten worden is geen consensus over. Bezoek ook het forum. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
eggie (2017-04-08 18:38:07+00:00): Waar een pad over een sloop gaat is of een brug of vaak een duiker
Brug is ..na  wegsplitsen:  bridge=yes, layer=1
Een duiker. waterway splitsen : tunnel=culvert, layer=-1
Succes...
arvdk (2017-04-14 15:40:36+00:00): Hoi Berco85, ik zie dat u gebouwen hebt toegevoegd, de nieuwbouw rondom de Emmerschans & Moerschans. Bedankt daarvoor. Ik heb op het BAG forum een import verzoek gedaan. Daarmee wordt vanuit het BAG-register de gebouwen, inclusief adreslabels, geïmporteerd in OSM. Dit mag u (in het vervolg) ook zelf doen. Mijn verzoek is te vinden via https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=641322#p641322
Vind u het te veel moeite? Dat geeft niet, laat dan even een 'note' achter op OSM, zodat andere mappers dat voor u kunnen doen. Groetjes, Arvdk
berco85 (2017-04-15 12:28:34+00:00): Top! Bedankt voor de tip.
Flixtey (2017-04-08 14:08:34+00:00): The narration given is wrong didn't clean it up after my previous edit
FraMauro (2017-04-12 12:05:04+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM.
Due osservazioni. 
1) il bar che hai inserito e quello del Nodo: 1470595913 sono lo stesso o no? Se sì, uno dei due andrebbe rimosso.
2) Capisco che apprezziate i vostri panini, ma quell'"ottimi" nella descrizione suona un po' troppo pubblicità... piuttosto dovreste cercare di inserire le altre informazioni (per esempio:  noleggio ombrelloni) con i tag appositi. Forse per la vostra attività andrebbe meglio leisure=beach_resort invece di amenity=bar ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:leisure%3Dbeach_resort )
mavl (2018-12-25 20:42:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
FTA (2017-04-10 02:12:01+00:00): Hey, thanks for catching this! I was able to track down the changeset that caused this: 46551152. There was the one little bit in south campus where the fleet vehicles are stored and the primate labs reside that wasn't included in this new relation, so I went ahead and added that way.
Best,
Ethan
mavl (2018-12-25 19:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Alan Trick (2017-04-10 18:45:17+00:00): Is "Buttefly World" a typo (i.e. is it missing an "r"?)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-18 15:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148822076 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some anti-Mormon vandalism and other rubbish
trigpoint (2017-04-08 15:29:58+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your addition however it looks like it should be a recreation ground rather than a park.
Dawid2849 (2025-02-18 15:56:13+00:00): Cześć. Czy ktoś faktycznie tak mówi?
Supaplex (2017-04-08 16:45:24+00:00): 有名字嗎?
Vintagejhan (2017-04-09 02:54:07+00:00): 沒有一個像是正式名稱的招牌，就先取最明顯的滷肉飯粄條好了XD
mariotomo (2021-04-28 15:45:25+00:00): hi there. are you still active with OSM? you still remember what this was about? I'm puzzled by the fields you added to the Relation: 2314149, namely 
    "EDICION_HI"="0.00000000"
    "OBJECTID"="2182.00000000"
    "OBJECTID_1"="1263"
    "SUBTIPO"="IGN TOMMY GUARDIA 1:50K"

looks like an import from their database, is it?
thank you for your consideration.
Aurimas Fišeras (2021-04-28 15:56:10+00:00): Hi, in this changeset I converted old-style multipolygon and just moved all existing tags from a way to the relation. Don't know anything about the tags.
mariotomo (2021-04-28 15:59:09+00:00): ah, ok, sorry … do you think you can help finding the changeset in which the tags were added?
mariotomo (2021-04-28 16:11:39+00:00): digging digging, I found some edits as old as 11 years.  sorry to bother you anyway.
Mapeiro (2018-05-20 10:21:52+00:00): O que são essas caixas postais todas que você está criando?
RoterEmil (2017-04-09 10:03:06+00:00): Hi, it seems that you mixed up here. This is Augsburg, Germany - so I reverted your change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47589063. Have a nice day
dudka (2017-04-11 08:30:56+00:00): did you run any script or made changes one by one reviewing each multipolygon?
sebastic (2017-04-11 10:16:37+00:00): I iterate over the relations one by one using the JOSM todo plugin.
dudka (2017-04-11 11:10:41+00:00): for buildings please also replace ways by multipolygons in associatedStreet relations
Jakka (2017-04-09 08:21:13+00:00): Can you give a more specific address nr, name? The point is on the road ?(Wrong)
user_5359 (2017-04-17 19:41:47+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte bei recycling:glass darauf achten, dass in den meisten Standardcontainer nur recycling:glass_bottles möglich ist (Glasscheiben können durch die runden Einwürfe nicht eingeworfen werden)
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:23:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
literan (2017-04-09 11:51:45+00:00): прекратите вандалить. Я откатываю подобное. Займитесь лучше внесением информации в базу, а не удалением.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
literan (2017-04-09 11:56:04+00:00): информация о том, что такое "Продукты" не вынесена в inscription с предварительной проверкой - поэтому откатываю. Не нужно удалять сведения, внесенные в базу другими редакторами.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:11:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
literan (2017-04-09 11:53:00+00:00): грузинская кухня уже включает в себя хинкали
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
literan (2017-04-09 11:54:02+00:00): вы не переносите информацию о вывеске в тег inscription (да, предварительно нужно проверить лично или по панорамам, что это действительно вывеска), поэтому я расцениваю подобные правки как вандализм и откатываю.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Jean Passepartout (2017-06-05 20:39:03+00:00): Way 352916011 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352916011) is a duplicate of 352916010.  The names doesn't match, so I can't figure out which one to remove.  Sorry that I can not converse in Farsi.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Alecs01 (2017-04-08 16:52:57+00:00): Por favor deja de spamear el mapa de esa manera, creaste decenas de POI sin sentido que son visibles para todos
PlaneMad (2017-04-11 05:35:00+00:00): Thank you for adding the missing Wikidata links!
Hjart (2017-04-08 18:01:52+00:00): Bemærk at selvom JOSM's validator ikke bryder sig om https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dbus, så er det stadig et gyldigt tag
datendelphin (2017-04-16 09:29:18+00:00): Used wrong account. This has nothing to do with the address import.
5m4u9 (2017-04-08 21:42:55+00:00): ya existe el área como zoologico, estoy borrando el nodo, es preferible añadir elementos dentro.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:11:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
SomeoneElse (2020-12-28 23:03:42+00:00): Hello,
Should Dunstable Downs https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485544020 be an AONB in its own right?  It's part of the area of Chiltern Hills AONB https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7129946 anyway.
Best Regards,
Andy
BharataHS (2017-04-10 11:55:31+00:00): Hello DerPendler,
Welcome and thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I observed that you have been adding description for gate in the `name` tag. But these are supposed to be added in the `description` tag and not in the name tag. Would be great if you could correct these and add appropriate tags for your further edits. Refer to the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Happy mapping! :-)

Thank you
Chieftl (2017-04-19 12:24:33+00:00): Добрий день
Дякуємо за позначку, але для позначення терміналів використовується значення amenity=payment_terminal замість amenity=atm для банкоматів.
Цей термінал я відредагував, удачі в майбутньому маппінгу :)
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
literan (2017-04-09 11:57:54+00:00): Здесь также текст на вывеске (если это вывеска) не перенесен в inscription. Откатываю.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].