piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheNet1996 (2022-02-09 18:48:05+00:00): Hi,
kein Problem :) 
Das Rufnummernformat +49 0xxxx ist ungültig. Einige Smartphones, z.B. das iPhone hat einen "Wahlassistent", der dann die führende 0 der Ortsvorwahl automatisch entfernt und einen Anruf möglich macht - aber es besitzen nicht alle Handys diese Funktion.
Deswegen sollten die Telefonnummern korrekt in OSM erfasst werden.
Viele Grüße
Mike
marine_geovelo (2022-08-02 09:19:16+00:00): Bonjour, pouvez vous m'indiquer si la route est toujours fermée à cause de l'éboulement ou si la circulation est revenue à la normale s'il vous plait. Marine de Geovelo
(support@geovelo.fr)
L'Oiseau Lybre (2022-08-02 09:23:13+00:00): Bonjour, je ne peux pas répondre de façon certaine à ce jour, mais la dernière fois que j'y suis passé, il y a un mois, la route était toujours fermée.
mike140 (2022-01-30 15:21:47+00:00): тут с контуром что-то не так: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4281438#map=14/50.7097/25.3645
user_9828679 (2022-01-30 16:30:28+00:00): Виправив, дякую.
jcr83 (2022-01-29 12:39:58+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez supprimé un bâtiment à Six-Fours. Est-ce volontaire ? Il semble toujours apparaître sur les dernières photos aériennes. Vous avez aussi supprimé et recréé un chemin. Il aurait mieux valu modifier le chemin.

Dans le commentaire, il faut expliquer ce que vous avez fait. Lire :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Jean Lechamois (2022-01-29 15:44:12+00:00): Merci pour ton aide. J'ai essayé de retrouvé un historique de mes modifications, pour t'expliquer l'histoire du batiment. Mais je ne trouve pas. Concernant le chemin c'etait en cliquant sur "Avertissement" et j'ai essayé de le corrigé en le modifiant, mais je n'ai pas reussi. Aussi je l'ai supprimé pour le recréer. Pour le bâtiment je veux bien le lien de ma midfication si tu l'as que je puisse expliquer. Merci.
jcr83 (2022-01-29 18:26:26+00:00): J'ai annulé tes changements sur le chemin :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/779698062
et sur le bâtiment :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143141322
pour te permettre de les refaire si nécessaire, en particulier pour le chemin essaie de le modifier sans le supprimer. J'y ai ajouté un portail, que j'ai cru voir sur la photo aérienne. Rectifie si nécessaire.
Larmax (2022-01-29 13:54:52+00:00): Are those names actually in use? (apart from Swedish)
KerikG (2022-01-29 15:45:00+00:00): In international use the names are to be used in the main language of the municipality. With the following exceptions:
In Finnish related Estonian the Finnish name is to be used although the municipality is mainly Swedish spekaing.
According to a Scandinavian agreement names in Swedish are to be used in the Swedish related languages although the main language of the municipality is Finnish.
These rules can be found at kotus.fi
Larmax (2022-01-29 14:01:57+00:00): But you kept the duplicate you edited instead of editing the building which was for the same thing as the node?
KerikG (2022-01-29 15:42:33+00:00): Oh my, sorry that was a misstake
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 10:49:15+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:漠河}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-29 11:11:05+00:00): Hey donsaan,

Welkom terug bij OpenStreetMap.

Feedback; Voeg voortaan even een opmerking toe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Opmerkingen
als je niet weet wat je moet wijzigen. De wijziging zullen we moeten terugdraaien.
Wees verder niet bang om fouten te maken.

We kunnen nog de bruikbaarheid van het pad toevoegen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
maar als je app deze tags niet gebruikt kunnen we verder niet veel voor je doen, dit ligt bij de makers.

Hier het pad in kwestie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277061903

PS: Overigens, toegang staat standaard op alles =yes. Als er een bord staat wat toegang verbiedt of inperkt kunnen we dit aanpassen.
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-29 11:16:12+00:00): Ik heb je wijziging hier teruggedraaid.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116739766
donsaan (2022-01-29 12:41:22+00:00): ik wil graag 3 punten aangeven waar het niet wenselijk is om daar met een fiets heen gestuurd te worden. Is het mogelijk dat ik het ergens kan aangeven. Ik ben nl ook vrijwilliger bij Fietsmaatje Alphen aan den Rijn. Je wordt soms ergens heen gestuurd waar je met een fiets al amper door kunt en al helemaal niet met een duofiets. Ik maak voor fietsmaaatje gebruik van de app Eroutes. Op die app kun je een route plannen je geeft een afstand in dan berekende die app er 3. 1 van die routes kun je dan gebruiken om te gaan fietsen. Eroutes maakt ook gebruik van openstreetmap. Ik hoop op deze manier te bereiken dat er zeker voor een fiets en dus ook een duofiets geen routes meer berekende worden door een weiland of dat je met een trap omhoog moet om verder te kunnen.  vandaar deze poging om met iemand in contact te treden in de hoop om dit te kunnen oplossen.
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-29 13:47:47+00:00): Kijk even naar het gebruiken van de fietsrouteplanner van bv. Fietsersbond (met "meer opties" bovenaan kan je filteren)
- PC:
https://routeplanner.fietsersbond.nl/
- Mobiel:
https://routeplanner.fietsersbond.nl/pagina/mobile

of als je een Garmin bij de hand hebt
https://www.openfietsmap.nl/

Anders een draadje starten op het forum
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
of ev. een bericht sturen aan gebruiker ligfietser
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ligfietser
die kunnen je wellicht verder helpen.
Echter, het blijft moeilijk voor routers om fietsroutes te suggereren buiten stedelijk/dichtbevolkt gebied.

Zie ook eerder antwoord.^
...en bij trappen kan je aangeven of ze een fiets e.d.-helling hebben;
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ramp

Zoals ik al zei, "toegang" kunnen we wel mappen, maar "bruikbaarheid" maar moeilijk. Voor een trap zou bv. "access=no + foot=yes" technisch gezien alleen nog voor voetgangers routeren, maar dit is moeilijk te verwerken voor een programma en is niet beter dan een trap zonder tags qua aangeven v.d. bruikbaarheid.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-14 21:35:59+00:00): Jesteś pewien tego wybiegu dla psów?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025788870/history
TomaszWójcik (2022-03-15 16:29:09+00:00): Ten obrys był tam zanim jeszcze zabrałem się za te tereny, po prostu nie chciałem usuwać czyjegoś wkładu bez zweryfikowania stanu faktycznego w terenie.
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 11:01:36+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:鸡西市}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 11:01:41+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:哈尔滨市}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
Larmax (2022-01-29 14:08:49+00:00): Hi, streets should only be tagged with official names. In Finland streets can only have names in Finnish, Swedish and in the Sami languages spoken in Finland.
KerikG (2022-01-29 15:47:21+00:00): I do understand that rule but: But You get into problems with Estonian and Norwegian, Danish and Islandic in those cases. The main name will be the one of the majority of the municipality. But because those languages are so closly related to Finnish or Swedish that they have to be able to use the finnish version of the names in Estonian or Swedish in Norwegian, Danish and Islandic, no matter what the main language is of that municipality. To add the Finnish names as Estonian will grant the use in Estonian and to add the Swedish names for the Scandinavian languages will grant these languages to use the names that are close to their lown anguages although the mainname will be in the other language.
Larmax (2022-01-29 18:56:24+00:00): No, that's not how OpenStreetmap works. OSM has a "Map what's on the ground" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability) principle which states that you should only map features that actually exist and in a way that aligns with what's "on the ground". The street signs of those roads only have Finnish and Swedish on them, so you can only add those two languages.
KerikG (2022-01-29 19:13:52+00:00): Well - why is there a different practice for the bigger cities then? If You go to Helsinki or Turku or to Brussels you will find a lot of spellings that are not in any road signs? In these cases I add a Swedish name in the other scandinavian languages so that name will even be written onj teh signs. So will not a lot of these other names that are entered.
Larmax (2022-01-29 19:31:36+00:00): Bigger cities and place names in general are different because they don't need to be marked by signs unlike things like street names, the names have just be in use. As for adding names in different languages just because a government authority gave a guideline that recommends using the Swedish names in other Scandinavian languages misses the point of OSM. OSM is not meant to be a list of potential names of things it's a map first and foremost. Software using OSM data could for example use the Swedish version of name automatically if it's been determined to be best practice for Norwegian for example. Adding the same name five times to random minor objects is basically just spam and makes the tags harder to read for other users and mappers.
KerikG (2022-01-29 19:42:17+00:00): ok- SPAMming is not my intention in any way
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 11:15:47+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:马鞍山市}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
abakus_uploader (2022-01-29 23:32:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_7130456 (2022-02-13 07:31:30+00:00): You words are really disgusting
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-13 08:34:13+00:00): 虽然一个三无小号在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115377464 中非常迷惑的把城市改成了罗森，但这并不代表它真的是罗森，也从来不代表武汉真的就不是武汉了。我们中国绘图者同样不会期望一个城市的标签被破坏，何来宣传？

不如回答这么几个问题：如果这位用户是把印第安纳州政府的名字改成了沃尔玛，把巴黎改成了家乐福，他是否有什么企图？

Although a newbie has very confusingly changed the city to Lawson in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115377464 , it doesn't mean it really is Lawson, and it never means that city really isn't city. We Chinese mappers likewise wouldn't expect a city's label to be destroyed, so what's the propaganda? I don't see. Only those people with a propaganda shaped eye can see a propaganda, maybe like you.

Can you answer those questions? If this user is changing the name of the Indiana state government to Wal-Mart and Paris to Carrefour, does he have any intention?
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 11:35:51+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:25];{{geocodeArea:无锡}}->.searchArea;(nwr["name"="未知"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
lyctkel (2022-06-17 05:46:26+00:00): Hi Natalia Idrisova,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025798453 which uses building=с.
This tag is only used twice.
From my point of view building=yes or something more specific would fit better.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Abuilding for details.
Regrads,
lyctkel
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 11:47:53+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:黑龙江省}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
vojtechzaboril (2022-01-31 16:15:29+00:00): Hi,
this section will be under construction from Feb 4 according to information from Min of Transport (MDČR)
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 12:07:25+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:山西省}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
Paul Berry (2022-02-01 15:13:37+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for fixing the otherwise invisible non-breaking spaces in the postcodes I recently added. I know now to check for these characters and I've sanitised my upcoming changes accordingly.

Regards,
_Paul_
RicoElectrico (2023-03-01 11:59:44+00:00): Cześć, spójrz proszę na tę uwagę i zaktualizuj, jeśli będziesz w stanie potwierdzić: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3578375
SomeoneElse (2022-06-30 23:32:46+00:00): Hello SHARCRASH,
We've had a complaint about the "merged equal elements" part of this changeset.  As an example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974591622 was previously mapped, and you can see that at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109919934 .  You've consolidated that in to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354361772 .
Neither approach is "wrong", but arguably https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109919934 is closer to how people think about farmland than the oddly-shaped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354361772 .
Please try and avoid "remapping" things that are already correct.  As https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5311 said, please leave room for other mappers in Luxembourg.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-07-03 11:09:17+00:00): Hello SHARCRASH,
I'm not going to have a discussion about "how to map farmland".  As I said above, neither approach is wrong.
The question is really about "please leave room for other mappers in Luxembourg".  You say "I'm not forbidding anyone to map" but that literally has been the effect of your actions.  Please do not always assume that your approach is correct and other people's approaches are wrong.
If it came down to it and we had to choose between keeping you as a contributor in Luxembourg but losing everyone else, or keeping everyone else and losing you, we'd choose the second option instantly.  However, we don't want to make that choice.  Please be respectful of what other people have already edited.
Best Regards,
Andy (from the DWG)
SHARCRASH (2022-07-04 19:33:50+00:00): Hi,

I'd like to know how, via which actions, am I not leaving room for other mappers in Luxembourg? You brought up the farmland differences but also said neither is wrong. So you are being very vague and even contradicting yourself. Certainly my merges do not forbid anyone in continuing to plot their polygons and i didn't contact anyone as I don't even know who we are talking about. Though you are threatening me and it seems that in the end I am the one who is going to be restricted... Do you find it fair??


I never said their approach is wrong. I just merge the elements or I update if needed. As already said, I never delete any areas geospatially already rendered. That's how the coverage in SW from Luxembourg has been able to extend or in W of Echternach, etc. 

If it's not about the farmland, the only times i contact other contributors is when I want to know about the recent changes regarding updated elements, or I want them to respect the tag definitions in OSM's Wiki to avoid misleading or when there are elements that disappear, that they rather tag them with the lifecycle prefix instead of deleting them, specially recent elements to avoid that someone else adds it back. Many contributors do this as i've been also contacted by them.

For a long time my profile invites people to cooperate with me: Feel free to contact me, i am opened to any discussion. If you have recommendations or corrections to suggest, do not hesitate to tell me.

When I was in conflict with tomolobla, Stereo suggested me to come in the IRC Luxembourg chat community to cooperate with the community and avoid conflicts. I did so and sometimes I share news regarding Luxembourg. Him and a very few handful others are the only ones communicating there. No one complained about me. So I don't get it, who is the person that complains about me? As far as it is possible, only one person can create a report to contact the DWG. Who is that representative and for whom really? Also you didn't give me the name of the person for the last time whereas i deserve a minimum of. All this is VERY shady! That's not being cooperative! 

I recall you, you don't have the right to forbid me to contribute as long as I'm not vandalising the data. Saying that i forbid others is absurd! The data is not yours, the infrastructure is not yours, you are supposed to support the community in order to have a faithful map, not spoil people who want to force another contributor to map a certain way.
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 12:15:57+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:铜川市}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;

sorry, this time is [natural=heath]->[natural=wood]
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-30 11:05:07+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Buraddo (2022-02-02 09:46:49+00:00): Hello,
I've seen something that you are doing on almost every edit you make.
Why do you delete ways for then to redraw them again? This is not alright as the way is losing its history and you often lose some tags this way. It's much better to just edit existing ways
DD1GJ (2022-01-29 13:14:37+00:00): Revert. Zurückgesetzt wg. mehrerer unbeabsichtigter Verschiebungen. Weitere Informationen in direkter Mail.
Jakka (2022-01-30 20:05:32+00:00): de tag access=private is hier eventueel nodig ...
pantufla (2022-01-29 15:55:29+00:00): Hey, thanks for your additions on natural=wood. I'm also wanting to see these huge forest already mapped and green instead of grey, but please consider to go slower on more precise as there are many areas that are generalized as natural=wood that arent. On the south you can fin more vast areas with 100% of wood but not in this area where it is more diverse.
Nesim (2022-01-29 19:22:44+00:00): Hello, my related work continues.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13710098#map=10/3.7534/-67.2793
pantufla (2022-01-30 20:52:37+00:00): understood... thanks for mapping
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-30 11:05:11+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
jcr83 (2022-01-29 20:58:57+00:00): Thank you for the correction, and sorry for my typo!
sandos (2022-06-02 10:26:40+00:00): Why access=permissive on a number of gates? There was one gate set as such on a road with _no access_! This is clearly wrong?
Msiipola (2022-06-02 17:41:48+00:00): What gates? Id's please.
sandos (2022-06-02 18:17:44+00:00): Hmm, this one is surrounded by access=no:

9457914694

But, I am now not sure if that gate even exists. Iv'e surveyed that road and I added no gate... I also vividly remember the "Skyddsobjekt" sign and nothing stopping anyone from continuining on the road.. I might have to survey again :)
Msiipola (2022-06-02 18:58:30+00:00): I can only say I have no idea what this is about. I don't remember I have ever added access tags, but I wrong. If I have to guess these erroneous tags are from previous versions, and not from the NVDB-import. But we have to find those erroneous id's, so we can check the history.

And if you find some errors, and you know these are real errors, please do a correction! I don't mind.
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 13:01:42+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:新兴县}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-16 22:13:53+00:00): se ta "caminho sem titulo" deveria estar sem nada no nome, certo? removi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/621815622
ScottWalkerAU (2022-02-01 02:37:45+00:00): Reverted in changeset 116846451
user_5359 (2022-02-03 07:05:21+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1fHu. You add the key website but add a email (your private email?) address as value. 
Are you the responsible contact for this object?
Or do you use it to mark your entries in OSM to find them again?
ScottWalkerAU (2022-02-01 01:46:11+00:00): Hi - this is not the correct way to map Wolstenholme and Endeavour streets. It makes routing a direct line impossible. They were correct the way they were originally
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116743508
Mister Levy (2022-02-01 02:04:34+00:00): Ok fair enough. I had problem though when creating maps in QGIS. It was showing up as multiple streets with the same name. Do you have any suggestions to fix this problem?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116743508
aharvey (2022-02-01 02:23:45+00:00): We'll revert this changeset to restore the original mapping. You'll need to handle any processing after obtaining OSM data on your end, it sounds like you're wanting to apply a dissolve operation on the name attribute.
ScottWalkerAU (2022-02-01 02:37:44+00:00): Reverted in changeset 116846451
Mister Levy (2022-02-01 03:07:35+00:00): Thanks! That "dissolve operation" suggestion once I googled it worked perfect.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116743508
osmviborg (2022-01-29 13:36:57+00:00): Se her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
user_2066394 (2022-01-29 16:33:48+00:00): Was war da mal angedacht mit dem Teil?
NUP (2022-01-31 20:14:07+00:00): Eigentlich sollten die Ackerfelder/Wälder erweitert werden.
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-30 11:05:13+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_5359 (2022-01-30 14:34:40+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/977928606? I can't correct your typo
add:housename = 10
addr:housename = Wit Bank Hill
addr:housenumber = 9
OneLoneRanger (2022-02-01 12:39:16+00:00): Sorry about that, corrected within https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116866848

Went out and re checked today, the house is called Wit-Bank Hill as per the stain glass above door and the house number on the door
rene78 (2022-01-30 04:45:41+00:00): Warum nicht "building=church"?
streckenkundler_revert (2022-01-30 20:48:59+00:00): Revert wegen Vandalismus. Vergleiche Forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74775

streckenkundler
streckenkundler_revert (2022-01-30 20:48:49+00:00): Revert wegen Vandalismus. Vergleiche Forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74775

streckenkundler
pitscheplatsch (2022-01-30 11:05:16+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ratrun (2022-01-31 18:39:33+00:00): Can you please check your new way 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025833722#map=20/31.97154/35.88667&layers=C

Where does this tunnel end?
Benoît C MdP (2022-02-09 12:47:03+00:00): Bonjour  Papusa,

Il y a vraiment un passage à niveau entre le raccordement ferré de la petite Ceinture et l'Allée Paris-Ivry ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9457984859 Pour moi, la voie ferrée est encore au stade de "projet" et est de toute manière un niveau (voire 2) au dessus de la chaussée.

Bonne continuation

Thomas
pbnoxious (2022-01-31 09:51:52+00:00): Hi, da du hier den Access nur auf einem Punkt geändert hast: Vermutlich darf man von hier in westlicher Richtung nicht weiter (laut schild?): Was ist mit dem Pfad weiter nördlich?
Würde die Beschränkungen lieber auf den Wegen eintragen, dann ist klar, was nicht begangen werden darf (auf der Node macht Sinn, wenn es ein geschlossenes Tor wäre)