piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
!bm (2021-01-10 17:00:37+00:00): Hallo cortado-unterwegs,

idealerweise nutzt man in so einem Fall den Node als Teil der neuen Way. 

Der Grund ist ganz einfach, dass die Chronik erhalten werden soll:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Entsprechend geändert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97256393

--besteGrüße!bm
eggie (2021-01-09 15:28:40+00:00): Tip: lanes=1 is ongebruikelijk op reguliere wegen en paden. Dat kun je gewoon weglaten.
lanes= wordt meer gebruikt op ingewikkelijke kruispunten met voorsoorteervakken.
Dus niet op een wandelpad. 
lanes=1 bv op eenrichting opritten
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2021-01-10 16:02:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
 Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regardsq
SomeoneElse (2021-01-09 20:18:52+00:00): Hello 03142, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Please provide more information about your edits - explain why you changed the things that you changed.  Why for example did you delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12140287 ?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2021-01-09 20:19:18+00:00): سلام 03142 ، و به OpenStreetMap خوش آمدید.
لطفاً اطلاعات بیشتری در مورد ویرایشهای خود ارائه دهید - توضیح دهید که چرا چیزهایی را که تغییر داده اید تغییر داده اید. چرا به عنوان مثال https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12140287 را حذف کردید؟
با احترام،
اندی تاونسند ، به نمایندگی از گروه کاری داده OSM.
03142 (2021-01-10 12:50:30+00:00): Thanks for the tip
Was corrected
many852123 (2021-01-14 15:35:28+00:00): Unfortunately, this user does not pay attention to the tips and rules mentioned on the osm site.
osmviborg (2021-01-09 15:58:36+00:00): Hej. Det er forkert at bruge tagget 'park' på sådan et område. Jeg har slettet det igen. Park kan du læse om her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
mavl (2021-11-03 14:53:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет тег source=Яндекс.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126256665/history  
  
Напишите, пожалуйста, что именно имеется в виду?  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
Frans S (2021-01-12 12:01:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I have to invalidate this task due to inaccurate and non squared mappings. 
Please correct you mappings
Best regards
Please read this info as well
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Frans S (2021-01-11 10:58:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. Difficult mapping due to the Imagery.
Your mappings are rather fair.
Please pay attention on these points. 
E: buildings not squared
D: buildings partly hidden under trees.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97217271
user_5239402 (2021-01-10 02:31:48+00:00): 안녕하세요 
왜 지하에 있는 역을 자꾸만 표현하시는 거죠?
지하에 있는 지하철역 건물은 굳이 표현을 않으셔도 됩니다.
야광멧돼지 (2021-01-15 12:42:22+00:00): 지하철 역사 건물이 지상에 크게 나와있으니까 표현 한겁니다. 지하철 역으로 하면 지하철 역이 여러게 있는걸로 나와서 지묵 속성을 건물로 수정했으니 문제 없을거 같은데요
user_5239402 (2021-01-16 08:59:29+00:00): 그러시면 지하철역으로 태그하시고 건물에 아무런 정보를 쓰지 마시고 지하철역 점에 정보를 넣으면 될것 같습니다.
Leo Slager (2021-01-10 13:22:22+00:00): Dag Jelle,
Helaas gaat dat met de editor iD altijd fout.
De nieuwe wegen die je toevoegt staan dan altijd achter aan de route en dus is de route gebroken.
Als je serieus met (bus) routerelaties aan de slag wilt dan adviseer ik je over te stappen naar de editor JOSM.
Dan kun je de routes bewerken en de wegen op de juiste plaats invoegen in de route.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
syntex (2021-09-26 15:23:32+00:00): Ścieżki rowerowe przykleja się do dróg nie do parkingów! Jak ma nawigacja po czymś takim prowadzić?
Frans S (2021-01-11 10:56:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark about your mappings of buildings with a pitched roof. See attached document: Par About buildings point 2
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97217876
zstadler (2021-01-12 10:06:44+00:00): Hello NFZANMNIM,

This looks like an import that was not described or discussed with the community.

Please refrain from further such imports or bulk updates and discuss your plans in advance with the Israeli OSM community at
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=33

Probably due to a bug in the import process, the "name:he" tag of several nodes was set to 
"דאחיהnote=This locality remains unrecognized by the State of Israel."
while none of them is actually "דאחיה".
See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12h4 for the list.

In 30 other nodes you added a "note" tag saying "This locality remains unrecognized by the State of Israel." This is a political statement, not "facts on the ground".

The comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97134498 also apply here.

Best Regards,
zstadler
zstadler (2021-01-20 08:26:28+00:00): Dear NFZANMNIM,
Please respond.
NFZANMNIM (2021-01-20 08:38:11+00:00): oh sorry i forgot lol. About the note "This locality remains unrecognized by the State of Israel." it's not my personal political opinion, it is their actual status. Thought it would be a useful information for such localities. 

As you might have noticed, I've been adding 2019 populations based on Census, to localities across the country. In Israeli census, the population of these unrecognized Bedouin settlements is grouped into "Localities without municipal status" or "יישובים חסרי מעמד מוניציפלי". So, I added the informative note instead of population.

Do you suggest moving it to "description" tag? or deleting it?

i don't know why name:he tags were copy-pasted incorrectly, apologies. How many localities have that incorrect Hebrew name? I'll spend time fixing them later.
zstadler (2021-01-20 14:58:23+00:00): Hello,

I may not have been clear enough. 
The main problem is that the name tag of several places is incorrect and it contains the text of the note.

I believe the note itself IS political because
1. Other "unrecognised" settelments don't have such a such a note.
2. The effort to recognize them is political movement, as can be seen in the source you cite.
3. The note does not refer to a "trouth on the ground".

I suggest you
1. Fix the name tags of the localities in this query - http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12h4
2. Delete the  "This locality remains unrecognized by the State of Israel." notes.
3. Discuss your future bulk editing and imports in the Israel OSM furum in advance.
zstadler (2021-07-11 17:22:05+00:00): This edit also deleted or removed names of existing Arab/Bedouin villages, such as

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494981714
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494981713
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826482498

As far as I can tell, all edits/deletions  of existing places, ways and relations, are errors.
4004 (2021-01-11 02:50:17+00:00): я так и не понял что это. выглядит как логистический центр (который здесь когда то и хотели сделать)
Pavelfantik (2021-01-11 16:15:05+00:00): строительный магазин-склад. в новом формате
4004 (2021-01-11 17:20:10+00:00): не shop=trade?
eggie (2021-01-09 16:49:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Update bedrijfspanden aangevraagd.
Zie forum OSM https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=814458#p814458


MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
zorglubu (2021-02-05 15:53:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Je me suis permis de corriger les noms des rues et routes afin de respecter les règles typographiques (cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Toponymes,_odonymes#Majuscules.2C_minuscules_et_trait_d.27union)

Surtout, continuez à ajouter des noms si vous en connaissez d'autres, ou si vous pouvez aller en rechercher dans les communes environnantes :-)

Merci et bonne continuation sur OSM.
Discostu36 (2022-10-16 09:18:06+00:00): Es sind leider Fehler beim Eintragen der Spuren entstanden, z.B. in der Bergstraße. Ich weiß nicht, ob es an dir lag oder an StreetComplete.
NM$L (2021-01-09 16:08:30+00:00): 恭祝公路贯通
itineris (2021-09-14 18:02:00+00:00): Hi,

You've replaced lots of power towers to "power=historic:tower". Why? It's invalid tagging.

Greets,
Ákos
Frans S (2021-01-10 15:08:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here .
Please take notice of next points 
C: Multiple buildings (1)
E:Buildings not squared (19).
in attached document you find more info.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
Frans S (2021-01-11 10:53:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Difficult Imagery to map from.
Please pay attention on these points. 
E: a few buildings not squared
F: buildings partly hidden under trees.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97219187
kapazao (2021-01-09 20:09:23+00:00): Las prohibiciones de giro en U no se deberían poner salvo que se indique en una señal. Es excesivo e innecesario.
Es un follón si ponemos en cada cruce de vías ese tipo de restricciones, a parte de que no sirven puesto que tampoco ningún gps te va a dar la vuelta ahí mismo :D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97219195
fjavier_gr (2021-01-10 10:56:32+00:00): Ok, lo corrijo, gracias.
eggie (2021-01-09 16:55:59+00:00): Dag Fred
Dat pad dat niet te zien is zou je gewoon kunnen verwijderen lijkt mij.
MVG
eggie
GartenStuhl (2021-01-10 10:36:35+00:00): salü
da review_requested=yes
Sieht fast gut aus. Die URL zur Homepage ist falsch (das "P" müsste klein geschrieben werden, dann funktionierts) und die Telefonnummer sollte mit der Landesvorwahl/International, ohne Abstände, eingetragen werden (+41717225956)
Bei den Öffnungszeiten gibts einige Syntaxfehler (anstatt . müsste : sein, die Wochentage abgekürzt in Englisch). Auch fehlt noch was an Feiertagen generell ist (PH off, public holidays = geschlossen)
hier der korrekte String:
Mo-Tu 08:00-19:00; Fr 08:00-20:00; SA 08:00-17:00; PH off
Vielen Dank fürs eintragen und happy mapping :)
GartenStuhl (2021-02-19 05:32:00+00:00): wurde angepasst in: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97242719
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97243440
gscscnd (2021-01-10 09:23:34+00:00): W Polsce (i nie tylko) drogi dla rowerów i pieszych oznacza się tagiem highway=path, a nie highway=cycleway. Poprawiłem. Jeżeli możesz, to dodaj jeszcze tag segregated z odpowiednią wartością.
Tomasz Herud (2021-01-18 20:34:21+00:00): Nie prawda, oznacza się jako highway=cycleway. Tak jak jest to robione na pewno w zachodniej części szerokopojętej konurbacji górnośląskiej. Jest to zgodne z dokumentacją: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
gscscnd (2021-01-18 21:34:12+00:00): (Statystyki z Polski, według <https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe/poland/>.)

Załóżmy, że mamy trzy (mniej lub bardziej prawidłowe) sposoby na oznaczenie drogi dla rowerów i pieszych z podziałem pasów lub bez tego podziału, pomijamy takie drogi zmapowane jako dwie osobne łamane (highway=cycleway i highway=footway).

1. highway=path bicycle=designated foot=designated — tutaj chyba się nie da odczytać wartości z Taginfo, więc zrobiłem analizę (używając <https://osmcode.org/osmium-tool/index.html>) na plikach PBF wszystkich województw z 6 stycznia i wyszło 22357 razy. Taginfo sugeruje coś tego rzędu.
2. highway=cycleway foot=designated — występuje 3501 razy.
3. highway=footway bicycle=designated — 2538 razy.


Teraz inna analiza — z jakimi wartościami tagu highway występuje tag segregated=(yes|no)?

1. highway=path — 21809 razy.
2. highway=cycleway — 3527 razy.
3. highway=footway — 3041 razy.


Następna — jak wyżej, ale tag bicycle=designated.

1. highway=path — 22999 razy.
2. highway=footway — 2538 razy.


Następna — jak wyżej, ale tag foot=designated.

1. highway=path — 23053 razy.
2. highway=cycleway — 3501 razy.


Poza tym: <https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6882>.
Bartłomiej Główczyk (2021-01-19 18:00:07+00:00): Tag segragated=no dodany
eggie (2021-01-09 18:07:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Lijkt me oke. 
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Patr1k_P (2021-01-10 09:36:15+00:00): nazdar, len namatkou som pozrel ako to robis a vsimol som si ze napr. tu mas 2 cisla na kope

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8281478902
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8281479106
...chcelo by to aj prekontrolovat s katastrom a to ktore neplati vymazat...dalej som si vsimol ze mas vela cisiel mimo budovu, malo by sa to umiestnovat na budovu, cize nemalo by to byt len o tom importe ale aj naslednej kontrole, ja to robim trebars po uliciach a kontrolujem kazde cislo....a este som si vsimol ze castokrat cislo pridas ale novu budovu nevytvoris, co som pozeral, tak budovy vies vytvarat
Tresho (2021-01-09 17:59:12+00:00): Ciao, alcune indicazioni per migliorare:
sarebbe più corretto utilizzare il tag landuse=construction invece di building=construction visto che l'area che hai inserito si riferisce all'area in costruzione e non all'edificio in sé.
I numeri civici vanno mappati come punti a sé stanti e non inseriti tra i tag dell'edificio (come vedi nei dintorni).
Inoltre il numero 17 esiste già sulla strada principale, forse ti riferivi al 17/E che è già mappato?
syntex (2021-01-19 10:14:11+00:00): To nie lepiej usunąć?
Rogoyski (2021-01-19 19:01:03+00:00): Zamknięte POI-e zaleca się właśnie oznaczać prefiksem disused:. Kiedy wprowadzi się nowy najemca lokalu, w zachowanym obiekcie będzie wciąż historia z poprzednimi biznesami w tym miejscu.
fkv (2021-10-14 01:32:44+00:00): Nur aus Interesse: Was sind das für zwei Höhlen?
TrickyFoxy (2022-07-28 19:36:54+00:00): source=Яндекс 🤨 Вы копируете с яндекс.карт?
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 17:20:42+00:00): per il name stesse osservazione fatte per highway, Nella route tra lekey obbligatorie mancano il ref, il cai_scale, la network; vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 17:44:26+00:00): nel mappare hai anche modificato la tappa 4 Palestrina - Guadagnolo del Cammino Naturale dei Parchi cancellando dalla route "CNP - 04 - Palestrina - Guadagnolo" circa 2 km del percorso
yakra (2021-04-29 01:45:38+00:00): Is this segment of the bypass open to traffic now? I've been trying to find news articles; no luck.
Trevor_1 (2021-07-24 13:27:10+00:00): I'm actually not sure. It looks like it is, from the satellite imagery
Trevor_1 (2021-07-24 13:29:00+00:00): I got a message from user gregcrago that said 
"No, the bypass was not complete when I tried to use it on 16 Dec. Later, I looked on Satellite imagery and the West portion of roads were PAVED, but I dont know if they were opened. I was traveling at night and I could not see very well. I had to drive thru the city. I changed the West portion from construction status to actual road types since it looks like try are paved now. Greg"
user_5359 (2021-01-10 05:57:56+00:00): Hello, may I ask you for help in interpreting the value service=GPL? I interpret GPL as a French abbreviation for LPG (also based on your areas of interest). Are you aware that to separate the different meanings of service, the key service:vehicle:* was introduced (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:vehicle). Taginfo introduces the service:vehicle:lpg (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service%3Avehicle%3Alpg#map) and unfortunately also the more inaccurate service:vehicle:gas (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service%3Avehicle%3Agas#map).
Would it make sense to gradually change the value service=GPL to service:vehicle:lpg=yes?

Short additional hint: Even if the editor iD offers the key telephone, the default key for a phone number is phone and expects an international phone number (including the country code of Algeria +213).
user_5359 (2021-01-10 18:34:15+00:00): Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/changeset/97239450
mouwatin (2021-01-10 19:02:48+00:00): Thank you for the suggestion, I will change gradually the wrong tags "service=GPL" to "service:vehicle:LPG".
user_5359 (2021-01-10 19:08:18+00:00): I hope so, with small :lpg. Of 26 different keys in which the term lpg occurs, only 2 are written with capital letters.
user_5359 (2021-01-11 04:28:45+00:00): Hi mouwatin, please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:service:vehicle&diff=next&oldid=2088326
felipeeugenio (2022-08-25 20:26:32+00:00): Hola
Las Pasarelas en Caleta Los Hornos no son Norte y Sur, son 1 y 2.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2022-08-28 21:50:54+00:00): La de Los Choros también estaba con nombre equivocado.
tux67 (2021-01-10 09:49:56+00:00): Danke, das sind ja einige, bei denen mir im Laufe der Zeit die Änderung durchgegangen ist ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97222533
SomeoneElse (2021-01-09 18:08:55+00:00): Hello,
About 3 years ago on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55276618 you were asked about some unverifiable changes, also added with "source=investigation" as here.  May I ask what the actual source is this time, and how someone can verify that, in line with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability ?
Best Regards,
Andy
ChrissW-R1 (2021-01-09 18:15:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97223848
SomeoneElse (2021-01-09 18:24:02+00:00): Thanks
eggie (2021-01-09 18:11:58+00:00): Alle adresnodes zijn import vanuit de BAH (Kadaster)  en zou dus moeten kloppen. Beter niet veranderen.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-01-09 18:18:21+00:00): nr 3 is inderdaad correct.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-01-23 14:10:11+00:00): Leuk paadje! Moet ik eens uitproberen, bedankt voor de toevoegingen!
eggie (2021-01-09 18:14:14+00:00): Beste Marutain,,
Er is een verzoek gedaan om import vanuit de BAG . Beter even wachten.
Gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend, maar periodiek geïmporteerd met adresnodes en al.
mvg
eggie
dieterdreist (2021-01-15 18:09:17+00:00): GRAZIE! Sei un grande!
eggie (2021-01-09 18:15:20+00:00): Gebouwen zelf kijgen geen adresinfo. Er loopt een verzoek voor import.. Dus even geduld.
mvg
eggie
czubi (2021-01-09 19:52:13+00:00): Sehr gut!
post_office:ref=xxx ist besser.
Und noch post_office:operator=Hermes als Bsp. für die Postfirma
czubi (2021-01-09 20:03:54+00:00): Deutsche Post;DHL;Hermes;TNT ...
Wenn mehrere dann semikolon dazwischen, ohne Leerzeichen!
eggie (2021-01-09 18:22:39+00:00): Bedrijven graag straks combineren met de import adresnodes.
Geen bedrijfs- en/of adresgegevens gegevens op de gebouwen.
Even wachten op import svp.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-09 19:22:39+00:00): Beste Marutain,

Er is hier nu officieel geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG.
Zie forum
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=814482#p814482

Je zou e.e.a. zelf nog kunnen controleren. 
MVG
eggie

Tevens als PB gestuurd
Nikenaus (2021-01-10 11:00:06+00:00): detailed work, thanks...
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-01-23 14:07:47+00:00): Hallo SustainableMobile,

Het lijkt me dat je hier per ongeluk een pad hebt omgetagged tot bank - dat lijkt me een ongelukje, zeker omdat je er net naast nog een bank hebt gezet.

Het gaat om dit pad: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199093652

Ik heb het terug aangepast. 

Tussen haakjes, het helpt als je je commentaar wat duidelijker maakt, zoals "toevoegen van bank en parking", zo weten andere mappers een beetje wat je wilt doen.

Mvg,
Pieter
literan (2021-01-10 21:32:55+00:00): массовая модификация без обсуждения с сообществом + наделали тупиковых primary. Откачу, пожалуйста, сначала обсудите с российским сообществом, хотя бы на форуме
literan (2021-01-10 21:33:11+00:00): и, пожалуйста, вносите корректные комментарии к правкам
Carto'Cité (2021-02-22 14:39:10+00:00): Merci pour la correction !
Antoine de Carto’Cité.
user_5359 (2021-01-10 18:52:53+00:00): Hello! Please note the difference between description and name of a thing. Your set name is clearly a description. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484830485/history (version 2)
dgitto (2021-01-10 16:01:54+00:00): Tieni comunque presente che le ortofoto Bing (e anche le altre) spesso sono disallineate, soprattutto nelle zone montuose. Appena ho tempo ricalco il castello dalle carte CTN1:2000 della regione Sicilia
ndm (2021-01-09 23:25:30+00:00): I've added back the service road that you deleted - without re-adding the connection.
philippec (2021-01-09 19:18:13+00:00): Antwerpen Jodenstraat aed.  Dat is dan een primeur voor Antwerpen binnen de muren.  We zullen het maar geloven :(
SustainableMobile (2021-01-10 09:29:06+00:00): Zeker, zelf gezien!
philippec (2021-01-19 19:24:20+00:00): U zit er deze keer slechts 51,35 meter naast.  U zou echt beter een Mapillary foto's nemen om u tegen uw eigen fouten te beschermen. 
Ik laat u het verbeteren.
philippec (2021-01-31 19:45:13+00:00): Het is niet nodig te deleten als je verplaatst.
Carnildo (2021-01-10 08:14:10+00:00): You deleted a number of logging roads that appear to still exist.  Is there a reason for that?
deven_smith_ (2021-01-10 23:13:21+00:00): Yes, I plan to come back and re-add them, just had to figure out who actually owns and manages the land since I know it's various logging companies. The land it usually not accessible besides a few roads (the roads I left and classified minor).
*Martin* (2021-05-18 13:23:29+00:00): Ten chodnik https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893759532 sa vola "Chodník"? A podla ortofoto je to sotva nejaka cesticka.
*Martin* (2021-05-18 13:24:06+00:00): To bralo (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8306795854) sa vola "Vyhliadka"?
JulesGabrielVerne (2021-06-12 22:13:32+00:00): Skąd wzięłeś trasę https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37940398#map=17/53.32711/14.62944 ? Takiego czegoś w ogóle niema w terenie
karson_ (2021-01-10 14:41:42+00:00): Please use Mapbox Satellite imagery if you are going to trace buildings in the Quad Cities. It is the highest quality imagery available and is also aligned.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97225492
cs-1838 (2021-01-10 17:01:35+00:00): Thanks, dear friend. I have corrected the geometry according to the Mapbox Satellite imagery 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97256435
wambacher (2021-01-10 18:47:59+00:00): Hi, kannst du mir bitte mal erklären, wieso du nodes mit entry=main löscht?

gruss
walter
wambacher (2021-01-10 18:48:44+00:00): sorry: entrance=main natürlich
basti1005 (2021-01-10 19:24:00+00:00): Hallo Walter,
diesen Eingang habe ich gelöscht, weil dieses Gebäude ebenfalls zur Ostseeklinik Boltenhagen gehört, deren Eingang sich beim 4-armigen Gebäude östlich befindet. 
Da die Ostsee-Therme geschlossen ist, ist dieser gelöschte Eingang ins Gebäude bestenfalls ein Nebeneingang.
LG Sebastian
Frans S (2021-01-11 14:57:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
A: inaccurate mapped
E: buildings not squared

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97225649