piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Maps Tester (2019-06-20 16:00:39+00:00): J'ai rétabli les bâtiments en mode "établissement scolaire" et non "partie de bâtiment" qui les rendait invisible.

Bien à vous,
Maps Tester
Virgile1994 (2019-06-21 09:47:17+00:00): C'est surtout que vous aviez cassé la relation multipolygone de l'ensemble du bâtiment. Vous êtes passé moins d'une heure après mes modifications du coup elles n’apparaissaient pas encore sur le rendu de base Mapnik, qui affichait alors encore vote modification du 17 juin qui avait fait disparaître le bâtiment du rendu.
J'ai donc du aujourd'hui de nouveau corriger vos bricolages afin que le lycée soit cartographié correctement.
D'aventure, avant de modifier des bâtiments complexes, pouvez-vous lire la documentation sur les building part et les multipolygones  ? Merci.
OSMement,
Virgile.
Maps Tester (2019-06-21 13:28:55+00:00): Bonjour,
Je n'avait pas modifié en soit la structure le 17 juin mais uniquement ajouté le réfectoire, un algéco et redimensionné le gymnase (que vous avez d'ailleurs mal redimensionné...).

Après toutes ces modifs le lycée se porte bien ;) , merci pour votre vigilance.

Bien à vous,
Maps Tester
Virgile1994 (2019-06-21 13:35:23+00:00): Si, vous aviez, (possiblement par mégarde du fait d'ID qui fait des trucs sans qu'on ne lui demande, ou fait croie que l'on fait de chose mais en fait d'autres en pratique), modifié la relation multipolygone qui fait le bâtiment, en y ajoutant d'autres éléments que le contour et les trous ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/30761/history ).
Pour le nouveau gymnase, je me base sur le cadastre, plus précis que la vue aérienne pour les bâtiments (réelle emprise au sol, et non forme du toit vu du ciel)
Maps Tester (2019-06-21 13:40:49+00:00): C'est possible que l'éditeur m'ait joué des tours.. 

Merci
carfog81 (2019-06-20 18:01:17+00:00): El área no representa nada en el mapa
PT-53 (2019-06-20 15:29:15+00:00): Hallo Calmato1625,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an mehreren Gebäuden name=Laucherttalschule Gammertingen - Werkrealschule eingetragen. 
Die Schule gibt es ja nur einmal. Deshalb wäre es besser, diesen Eintrag auch nur einmal in OSM zu haben. Wenn Du das Schul-Gelände einigermassen kennst, zeiche doch einen Umriß des Schulgeländes ein und trage alle school-Merkmale am Umriß ein. Statt dessen besteht auch die Möglichkeit, im Zentrum des Schulgeländes, einen Punkt zu setzen und dort alle Schulmerkmale einzutragen.
Wiki school: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Du machst das - für einen Neuen - schon recht gut. Weiter so.

Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-20 15:31:46+00:00): PS: Die Gebäude hätten noch eine Anpassung an Maps4BW verdient.
PT-53 (2019-07-14 06:34:06+00:00): Hallo Calmato1625, 
"Laucherttalschule Gammertingen" wird jetzt 3x auf der Karte angezeigt. Einmal sollte doch reichen?
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-21 06:18:18+00:00): Hallo Calmato1625, 
Danke für die Überarbeitung.
Grüße
frosm (2019-06-21 10:59:56+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
je m'étonne de l'emplacement de la barrière au nord-est qui n’apparaît pas encore sur la vue aérienne: comment est-ce qu'on se rend aux usines Ashland ? il y a une nouvelle route ?
Par ailleurs vous avez transformé la rue en barrière (j'ai annulé cette erreur)
bonne continuation
Huckansawyer (2019-06-21 11:48:20+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour la bienvenue !
J'y étais le 29 mai, il y avait une belle barrière verte toute neuve avec un panneau "Privé" de mémoire.
Désolé pour la mauvaise modification, je vais me replonger dans la méthode de modification.
Bonne journée.
maraf24 (2019-06-25 08:30:29+00:00): Nie, te budynki i wszystkie między nimi "wystawały" z zabudowy.
FraukeLeo (2021-08-19 14:44:32+00:00): There is no weir here. Half of the year, there is not even water :)
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-10-08 19:23:02+00:00): Eine so gravierende Strukturänderung sollte vorab mit der Community abgeklärt werden. Siehe Diskussion hier: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2019-October/010296.html. Bitte beteilige dich an der Diskussion. LG Robert
Roland5 (2019-10-11 09:24:51+00:00): Das Konzept umfangreiche Routen und insbesondere Route mit mehreren Varianten (wie beim R2) in einer super-relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Super-Relation) zu organisieren erschien mir etabliert und regelmässig angewendet. Ich hatte eine solche Änderung nicht als gravierend eingestuft. 

Die Aufteilung in mehrere Teilstrecken ohne Verzweigungen hat mir die Aktualisierungsarbeit sehr erleichtert. Das Finden von Lücken, das Finden von falschen Elementen ist bei linearen Strecken wesentlich einfacher und bei einer Gesamtrelation fast nicht mehr machbar.

Eine vertiefte Darstellung der Problematik findet sich unter  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Creating_super-relations_for_routes
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-10-11 16:52:22+00:00): Hallo Roland5,
deine Motivation kann ich gut nachvollziehen und ich finde es gut, dass du es angepackt hast. 
Nur das Ergebnis ist m.E. nicht stimmig, wobei ich nicht weiß, ob es am Konzept oder an der Durchführung liegt.
Du verlinkst 2x zu Super-Relation, deine Änderung war aber route --> superroute (V 1036 --> V 1037). Superroute und Super-Relation ist nicht das Gleiche! Eine Verwechslung?
Ja, klar, die Super-Relation ist etabliert, die superroute ebenso und genauso route_master. Darum geht es mir aber nicht, sondern wichtiger:  WIE wird der Murradweg in seine Abschnitte strukturiert, bei bestmöglicher Nähe zur Realität. Sind es Varianten? Sind es Alternativen? Was tun mit den Querverbindungen? Da gibt es möglicherweise unterschiedliche Sichtweisen. Beteilige dich bitte bei der talk-at  Diskussion oder benutze das Forum.
LG Robert
Roland5 (2019-10-19 14:08:53+00:00): Mein Anspruch an diesen Change-Set war ein 'besser' nicht 'das Beste'. Falls mir das nicht gelungen ist, bitte ich um Pardon und biete an, beim Aufräumen des Schadens mitzuhelfen. 

Ein weitere Mail-Liste zu abonnierend widerstrebt mir im Moment. Damit wird es für mich noch schwieriger aus meinem Postfach die relevanten Nachrichten heraus zu picken und meine Mail-Adresse wird weiteren SPAM-Versendern bekannt.
viloan (2019-06-20 15:37:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-21 00:13:05+00:00): Hi there,
What is this supposed to be? You've placed a park in the middle of the road here.
henrythemouse (2019-06-21 03:19:45+00:00): I had some trouble with this location. If I located it somewhere inside the park, the route would go wrong. This location is the the result of using the park's street address. The location is the entrance to the park.
henrythemouse (2019-06-21 03:22:59+00:00): Although I seem to recall I may have gotten the address wrong. Checking addresses on the web doesn't always give accurate information I think. The correct address is:
5540 Kiowa Drive, La Mesa, CA 91942 USA
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-21 03:35:15+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for getting back to me. I can check to see if I can find a OSM-safe source for this park and add it as an area. Are you able to confirm its name and that park is the appropriate tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark)? Is the park the space to the East of where the pin is currently located?
henrythemouse (2019-06-21 04:31:06+00:00): I'd say the tag is appropiate.

Lake Murray is the lake just north of where the pin is located, the pin being at the entrance gate to the park. There is a park surrounding the lake that is called Lake Murray Park. If you zoom out you will see this. It's part of a much larger area known as Mission Trails Regional Park which occupies a very large area to the north of Murray Lake.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-23 03:52:14+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for the late reply. There is already a park mapped around Lake Murray - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6006999#map=16/32.7878/-117.0465

As you say, it's part of the much larger Mission Trails Park, but the lake is also mapped. With those two mapped areas in mind, I'm not sure what this node contributes to the map in this area?
henrythemouse (2019-06-23 04:22:37+00:00): That's a good point.
My intention was for someone to be able to search for "Lake Murray" and have an OSM client show that someone how to get there.
When I tried it it didn't work for me. Even now when I try it in the OSM web UI the only link I see that is close is my pin.
If that isn't a needed contribution then I'd say remove it. I know where the lake is  ;-)
No need to duplicate things.
viloan (2019-06-20 15:57:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Zverik (2019-06-21 07:50:20+00:00): Hi,

You have added few turn restrictions that don't seem to correspond to signs on the ground. Are these restrictions active for every car type, and not just trucks? If it's the latter, could you please use tag "restriction:hgv=*" instead of "restriction=*" in these?

Ilya
TheBestIdea (2019-06-26 17:18:37+00:00): Hi Ilya,

The new left turn restrictions on 14th between 3rd and 9th ave are for the transit/truck priority route pilot project that NYC DOT is currently implementing. They will be for all cars/trucks. I saw signs for some of the new left turn restrictions in the past two weeks and assumed that all the planed ones had been implemented. If you've surveyed in the past week and I was wrong about anything, please feel free to revert. 

-Brandon
Constable (2019-06-21 17:28:48+00:00): grazie!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:48:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:48:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:46:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:48:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
Ars-UA (2019-06-20 18:05:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3927213335#map=19/47.09662/37.54465
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:46:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:48:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:46:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
~Jhellico (2019-06-21 06:38:40+00:00): telephone=amenity - також неправильно, раджу ставити office=telecommunication + shop=mobile_phone
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:48:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:48:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:46:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:48:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
cepesko (2020-11-03 07:12:56+00:00): "Sackgasse" ist sicher nicht der Straßenname bei zwei der Wege. Vorschlag: noexit=yes ist das tag der Wahl
Zugewachsene Wege nicht löschen, Vorschlag hier: abandoned:highway=...
PT-53 (2020-11-03 07:58:20+00:00): Bitte dabei beachten, daß noexit=yes nicht an den Weg gehört sondern an den letzten Knoten des Weges (sofern überhaupt erforderlich)
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit
Grüße
Constable (2019-06-20 17:16:12+00:00): Ciao Arturo, grazie per la modifica!
Occhio però perché la ciclabile, così aggiunta, non è del tutto corretta.
Andrebbe (all'estremità nord) connessa a questo punto https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6456760469 , non dove è connessa adesso, perché leggendo la mappa ora si intende che la ciclabile incrocia quella strada in quel punto, quando in realtà il primo punto di connessione con la strada è quello slargo per fare inversione in auto.
Secondo, il nome non credo sia "Ciclabile". Se la ciclabile è intitolata a qualcuno è corretto indicare il nome, in caso contrario il nome va omesso. Vale lo stesso per tutti gli oggetti della mappa; ciò che indica che si tratta di una ciclabile è l'etichetta highway=cycleway, non il nome. Senò seguendo lo stesso ragionamento dovremmo chiamare "Albero" ogni albero della mappa, "Casa" ogni casa e così via.
Riesci a correggere per favore?
grazie
Constable (2019-06-28 10:03:56+00:00): Grazie!
user_5359 (2019-06-21 04:29:31+00:00): Hello! You add a restaurant with two different phone numbers (with the keys phone and Phone). We normally only use keys with lower case letters. I merge the both values to phone.
Callirhoé (2019-06-28 13:47:53+00:00): #Passages #LPED #recherche
Callirhoé (2019-06-28 13:47:44+00:00): #Passages #LPED #recherche
SomeoneElse (2019-07-13 13:32:42+00:00): Thanks for fixing this.  I've reverted a couple of other edits by this user (see discussions on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69713108 ) - is everything else OK?
user_5359 (2019-06-20 20:38:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the value highway=motorway (please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway)
dromedar61 (2019-07-28 20:18:00+00:00): Hallo Stauros!
Warum hast du diesen Steig entfernt ???
Ich hatte ihn 2018 vom Orthofoto eingetragen, da ich diesen einsamen Weg gehen wollte.
Ich bin ihn dann vor etwa 1 Woche gegangen und musste feststellen, dass der Weg von dir gelöscht wurde.
Bitte
- erklär mir deine Gründe, warum du das getan hast
- mach die löschung rückgängig
- lass solchen Unfug künftig.

Grüße aus Linz - Bernhard/Dromedar61
Gppes (2019-07-29 06:12:06+00:00): Hallo, auch wenn Deine Einwaende berechtigt sein moegen, sollte man - trotz Enttaeuschung -auf den Umgangston achten!

Lg, Gppes
Stauros1980 (2019-07-31 07:46:21+00:00): Servus Bernhard!
Am 17. 5. 2018 habe ich Dich wegen dem path schon mal angeschrieben. Du wolltest den Pfad nochmals mit einem "Einheimischen" behgehen und die Fragmente zu einem zusammenhängenden path zusammenfügen. Bisher hat sich nichts getan und die note stellte eindeutig die Existenz dieses Weges in Frage. Wenn Du einen GPS-Track hast, dann bitte ergänze den Weg durchgehend bis zum Gipfel. Ansonsten ist der tag path hierfür nicht zu verwenden. 

Grüße Stauros
dromedar61 (2019-07-31 08:09:26+00:00): Hallo Stauros!
Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Ich hab einen Track, muss ihn aber erst hochladen und werde den Weg neu zeichnen.
Dennoch eine generelle Anmerkung: Bitte lösch keine Wegfragmente im Gebirge. Auch wenn diese für dich sinnlos erscheinen mögen, können diese zb einen im Nebel oder im Latschengestrüpp verirrten Bergsteiger große Hilfe leisten.
Den Normalnutzer von OSM sollten diese Wegfragmente ohnehin nicht irritieren.
In der Opentopomap werden übrigens mühsame Wege entsprechend sac_scale gut gekennzeichnet.
lg Bernhard