piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
praeteritum (2023-06-15 06:31:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137355250.
praeteritum (2023-06-15 06:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137355218.
eggie (2022-03-22 16:00:50+00:00): Dag Choud.. Je zou die oprijlanen naar woningen evt nog extra kunnen taggen met service=driveway  Dat rendert ook iets dunner. 
Gr eggie
Choud (2022-03-22 18:40:53+00:00): Oh dat lijkt me een betere tag inderdaad...
Ik doe nog veel naar wat er al in de omgeving is.
praeteritum (2023-04-09 19:51:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134702099.
praeteritum (2023-06-14 06:31:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137312049.
user_5359 (2022-03-24 08:37:44+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag list:fmm_000 = yes?
praeteritum (2023-04-09 19:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134702081.
VictorIE (2022-03-26 02:53:24+00:00): Hi, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042670963

It's not appropriate to include hypothetical changes in the live map.

You might take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
dónal (2022-03-26 11:49:42+00:00): reverted by changeset 118944102.
spiregrain (2022-03-22 15:47:43+00:00): source given as "Ptolemy Elrington" - this is incorrect.   Source should have been given as http://www.offbeat.group.shef.ac.uk/statues/STUK_Edwards_Jonathan.htm
praeteritum (2023-06-14 06:29:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137312011.
praeteritum (2023-06-13 07:18:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137272287.
praeteritum (2023-06-12 03:59:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137225745.
Vinber (2022-03-27 17:12:27+00:00): Bienvenue VéloCité :)
Vinber (2022-03-27 17:12:45+00:00): Ne pas hésiter à décrire votre profil !
velo-cite (2022-03-28 08:07:55+00:00): Merci pour l'accueil! Profil mis à jour!
wo0GSWr6MfJgFj (2022-10-09 19:10:43+00:00): Bra jobbat! Det lades till en del vägnamn med den här importen som jag inte hittar belägg för någon annanstans. Är det NVDB som är källan till exempelvis Hjulåsen VSF, Höghultsvägen VSF? VSF låter ju mer som (väg)samhållighetsförening eller något.
Msiipola (2022-10-09 20:12:02+00:00): Ja, namnen kommer från NVDB. Jag tycker också vägnamn med VSF känns tveksamt men jag har inget annat att gå efter. Om du eller någon vet att namnen är fel, uppdatera gärna. Namnen bör också uppdateras i så fall i NVDB genom att skriva en felrapport på deras hemsida.
Colin Smale (2022-03-22 16:04:55+00:00): boundary ways that are *only* for boundary=political relations should not be tagged as boundary=administrative.... better to set them to boundary=political
ramthelinefeed (2022-03-22 16:08:16+00:00): Oh I see. Sorry. I seem to have been enticed by the tag suggestions of the ID editor (and not for the first time...) 

Can I maybe just keep the 'way' itself as a 'line'? As the ward boundary itself is done using a relation.
Colin Smale (2022-03-22 17:06:45+00:00): Yes, it would not be incorrect to remove the tag from the way completely. It is not my personal preference, as it is sometimes difficult to distinguish one line from another (in various editors) without this kind of "hint" though. There appears to be a kind of undocumented hierarchy, with "administrative" at the top, then "political", "historic" etc all the way down to "national_park"; the tradition is to tag the ways with the boundary type which is highest in the "hierarchy" of all the boundaries of which the way is a member.
ramthelinefeed (2022-03-22 17:13:19+00:00): OK :)  Well I have removed the 'boundary=' tag from the line/way, and left the line tagged with the Brixton North ward relation. 
Thanks for flagging!
user_5359 (2022-03-24 08:38:47+00:00): Hello (again) What is the meaning of the tag list:fmm_000 = yes?
NieWnen (2022-03-23 10:21:21+00:00): Przy zdejmowaniu construction, powinno się zdjąć również tag construction=* i np. inne w tym przypadku np. note=, który informuje o zmianie organizacji, bo takie rzeczy lubią zostawać na dłuższy czas potem.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038038999
Nate Wessel (2022-12-10 19:10:08+00:00): I've reverted this in changeset #129942938, restoring the mall's mostly demolished state. I think you may have traced it back in from outdated imagery. It's well on its way to being condos now.
joost schouppe (2022-03-23 16:08:31+00:00): Ik heb de picnic tafel op jullie terras gezet, aan de andere kant van het gebouw volgens mij. Dat terras, is dat publiek toegankelijk? Je hebt ook nog een bankje binnen in je gebouw gezet, was dat de bedoeling?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118786020
theDM (2025-02-25 16:06:46+00:00): Masz jakieś info, czy faktycznie jest to rondo planowane i toczą się w tym kierunku prace?
Palolo (2022-04-16 18:44:19+00:00): @SMiller94 Thank you for your first contribution to OSM. Please keep contributing.
rskedgell (2023-04-09 20:20:03+00:00): Since the access tags on this are wrong (there are TSRGD diagram 617 "no vehicles" signs either side), it is fortunate that the node for RWG072783 was not actually connected to a highway and consequently did not cause bicycle routing errors.
Palolo (2022-04-16 18:22:05+00:00): @[Sarah LUC] Congratulations on your first edits to OSM, we appreciate the help in Tanzania.
Palolo (2022-04-16 18:35:12+00:00): @[Lorna H] Congratulations on your first contribution to OSM, thank you. Please note that buildings do not need the tag name=building. Thanks
user_8101879 (2022-03-23 15:31:02+00:00): again "otuer"
praeteritum (2023-03-28 07:05:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134205779.
Palolo (2022-04-23 20:51:19+00:00): Thank you for helping map Tanzania. Next time please look over the instructions to learn how to make square corners on the buildings. Use the q key. Thank you
eggie (2022-03-22 18:23:40+00:00): Dag Rutger.. Je kunt die niet bestaande brandgang gewoon verwijderen
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-22 18:26:40+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70901477
eggie (2022-03-22 18:29:03+00:00): Het is sowieso  verstandig om de brandgangen waar geen vreemde snoeshanen horen te komen op access=private te zetten.
'k Zie hier ook nog meer brandgangen die niet bestaan of horen door te lopen.
Up to you..
Voorgaande mapper heb ik ingeseind.
Gr eggie
JoeMapsTheWorld (2022-03-22 17:34:45+00:00): I used the wrong changeset description I am so sorry
UNGSC-Jrachi (2022-04-26 08:08:57+00:00): Scusa ma le rovine degli edifici non si taggano come historic=ruins
È un tag per elementi storici! 
Usa piuttosto: building=ruins https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=ruins
E se sei d'accordo correggi quelli che hai inserito sinora.
Fulvio Senore (2022-04-27 17:35:02+00:00): Ricordo che il tag mi aveva lasciato perplesso ma nella zona c'erano già altri edifici in rovina taggati in quel modo così ho deciso di fare la stessa cosa per uniformità. In molti altri posti ho taggato con building=ruins quindi posso farlo anche qui senza problemi. Cosa faccio con gli edifici che c'erano già e che erano taggati in modo scorretto? Li correggo?
Fulvio Senore (2022-05-03 07:20:48+00:00): Ho corretto gli edifici con building=ruins.
abrensch (2022-03-23 13:36:28+00:00): Hallo DoubleA,

hast Du eine Sperre am Elefantenklo nur aufgrund einer JOSM-Warnung eingetragen, oder weisst Du tatsächlich, dass da was gesperrt ist?

Ich finde jedenfalls nichts, und müsste ja sehr langfristig sein, dnn der ursaächle Edit ist ja älter als ein Jahr

Danke fürs Nachschauen,

Gruss, Arndt
abrensch (2022-03-28 12:22:27+00:00): Nochmal Hallo,

ich hab' as Elefantenklo entsperrt da es Dich offenbar nicht interessiert
santamariense (2022-04-04 00:39:51+00:00): Olá, tha_correia. Não é de boa prática distorcer as características reais de uma via para que uma rota seja evitada. É claramente visível pela imagem de satélite que a rua é pavimentada e que também é possível transitar com veículos por ela. O que você pode é, por meio de informações verdadeiras, inserir os dados das ruas, e fica a cargo do navegador decidir qual a melhor rota.
Sugestão: 
- smoothness - vocẽ pode usar esta tag para descrever a qualidade da superfície: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness 
[]'s
santamariense
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118788657
user_5359 (2022-03-22 19:28:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Could you pleas add some information about product sold
osmeditor3753 (2022-03-23 03:05:35+00:00): It sells a variety of beverages, water and soft drinks.
eggie (2022-03-22 18:34:00+00:00): Rutger..  Je vraagt feedback.. 
Lijkt me oke..  Ik heb de highway= residential omgezet naar =service met service=driveway
Je zou de hekken nog kunnen toevoegen op nodes.
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2022-03-23 19:19:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1042695720 (one of nine). What is the meaning of the tags
Níveis = 2
altura = 6

Bem-vindo à OSM! Por favor, dê uma olhada em http://www.osm.org/way/1042695720 (um dos nove). Qual é o significado das tags
Níveis = 2
altura = 6
SHARCRASH (2022-03-22 19:12:07+00:00): + MP desintegration
A67-A67 (2022-03-23 15:28:33+00:00): Ik heb het scheidingsteken verbeterd naar een puntkomma. We gebruiken namelijk puntkomma's i.p.v. komma's om meerdere waarden te scheiden.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-24 14:43:00+00:00): Why was landuse=forest removed from features?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118790331
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-06-30 09:53:03+00:00): Dík za doplnění, stále nevím kde je to nepojené k síti
praeteritum (2023-03-27 02:19:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134156343.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 21:50:33+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118795651. Сградата и пътя са видими на сателитни изображения от февруари 2022-ра.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 21:50:35+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118795651. Сградата и пътя са видими на сателитни изображения от февруари 2022-ра.
praeteritum (2023-03-26 00:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134121619.
aixbrick (2022-03-23 08:18:06+00:00): Hallo,
building=terrace beschreibt kein einzelnes Reihenhaus, sondern den gesamten Block, also wenn es einen Umriss gibt, der mehrere Gebäude umfasst. Das korrekte Tag für ein einzelnes Reihenhaus wäre building=house. Siehe hierzu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=terrace bzw. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74973.
Gruß
HelpfulB (2022-03-23 08:56:17+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. -.-
D.h. das Tag für Row-Houses aus StreetComplete sollte in der Praxis kaum vorkommen und stattdessen wird es faktisch immer auf House (non detached) hinauslaufen.
Gruß
aixbrick (2022-03-23 09:26:20+00:00): Das hängt davon ab, wie es in OSM gemappt ist. Es kann vorkommen, dass es nur den  Block-Umriss gibt und die Eingänge als Nodes eingetragen sind. Beispiel in Düren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119313814, Mapillary: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.793319554115&lng=6.5008566621751&z=17&pKey=2940978509451927&focus=photo. Das könnte ein Fall für building=terrace sein.
HelpfulB (2022-03-23 09:51:07+00:00): Okay. Dann ist meine Stichprobe aus AC wohl nicht vollständig repräsentativ. Dort sind alle meine Row-Houses, die dann als terrace eingetragen wurden, eigentlich einfach Houses. Ich schaue mal, ob der Foreneintrag mir hilft, das glatt zu ziehen.
aixbrick (2022-04-02 19:58:15+00:00): Im Rahmen von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119245886 auf building=house geändert.
praeteritum (2023-03-26 00:09:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134121605.
Alexmol (2022-03-22 19:34:20+00:00): Faltou o comentário: Actualização de postos de carregamento.
kapazao (2022-03-25 15:22:10+00:00): Buenas, no queda claro en esta tienda si está abierta o no (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9597948130).
Has usado la etiqueta tienda y también la de tienda en desuso.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118791825
eggie (2022-03-22 20:30:57+00:00): Zie hier  https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=hoge%20maat%2010&resultOffset=0&objectId=0352100000001406&geometry.x=149923.19&geometry.y=442863.31200042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=

Het gebouw zal ik even uitlijnen met de huidige BAG data.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-22 20:35:32+00:00): Tja.. en wat met die dierenwinkel?   Wie van de twee is nu de juiste?
Pas je het zelf aan?
Gr eggie
Information01 (2022-03-22 20:36:33+00:00): Eggie,
Deze database kende ik nog niet. Altijd handig. Moet wel zeggen dat de omtrek zoals nu getoond wordt in de BAG eigenlijk niet klopt met de werkelijkheid. Ik weet niet hoe vaak BAG geupdate wordt. Op de satelietfoto zie je achter het gebouw een aanbouw met veel zonnecellen. Dit gebouw zit vast aan hoge Maat 10.

Gr. Allan
Information01 (2022-03-22 20:38:59+00:00): Ik zal hem aanpassen en daarnaast aanvinken dat iemand het mag controleren en een opmerking kan maken.

Allan
eggie (2022-03-22 20:40:53+00:00): Oke Allen... 
In de BGT omtrekgericht zie je niet die aanbouw met die zonnecellen.
In de Kadasterdata wel.  
Wanneer iets niet klopt dan kun je dat doorgeven.
Dat kan op bovenstaande site.., maar volgens mij het je (ongeveer) goed aangepast. Ik heb het alleen even uitgelijnd met de Kadasterdata.
Even CTRL-F5  voor het resultaat.
eggie (2022-03-22 20:44:32+00:00): In JOSM heb ik de transparanten van de BGT en het Kadaster (BAG)  op de achtergrond

Zie hier hoe je dat kunt doen.
BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg
Information01 (2022-03-22 20:45:36+00:00): Dank je. Ik heb de gegevens van huisnummer 10 aangepast. Bedankt voor het uitlijnen en mij weer wat wijzer maken van de mogelijkheden met openstreetmap.
praeteritum (2023-03-25 23:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134121329.
praeteritum (2023-06-11 04:37:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 137190602.
eggie (2022-03-22 20:27:21+00:00): Dag Pascal.. In OSM staan de adressen op adresnodes. Dus niet nogmaals op de gebouw. Nu is het een beetje verwarrend. 3x 9D
8C en 9C?
Gebouwen tekenen we ook niet zelf in. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dat aan het Kadaster doorgeven middels een terugmelding
Dat kan hier
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Molecatenlaan%209&resultOffset=0&objectId=0200200000110073&geometry.x=193006.046&geometry.y=466636.624&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0200010003943168
In OSM importeren we vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)
Het staat nu nog op Bouwvergunning verleend. Dat zou je ook kunnen doorgeven.
Een verzoek tot import kun je doen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. Dan komen de juiste adressen ook mee. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-23 08:23:51+00:00): De adressen voorlopig even wat opgeschoond.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 16:33:06+00:00): Likely Crambe not Crakehall
Welshie (2022-08-30 16:43:38+00:00): You are correct. My mistake. Corrected name and ref
praeteritum (2023-03-24 21:53:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134085653.
user_5359 (2022-03-23 19:08:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042728877. What is the meaning of the tag Rosen = |||merge_to_left ? I assume a copy & paste error.
felipeeugenio (2022-03-23 19:11:47+00:00): Hello.  just a typo.
I´ll correct it. I am currently mapping the area, so please don´t do nothing.
thanks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
eggie (2022-03-23 16:05:11+00:00): Dag wilsberg
Je vraagt feedback Probeer te voorkomen dat de paden gaan vastplakken aan de landuse. Gebruik de linker alttoets bij intekenen.
Je pad naar het bankje heeft geen tags dus het zal niet routeren. Het is een lege lijn.
Kijk je nog even?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118793068

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-23 16:08:09+00:00): De paden heb ik maar even losgemaakt van de landuse. Het pad zonder tags is nu een highway=footway, maar loopt wel door de sloot. Iets om op te lossen denk ik. 
gr eggie
wilsberg (2022-03-23 19:01:34+00:00): Hi eggie,
thank you, I've added a bridge over the Bocholtzerbeek.
limes11 (2022-03-22 21:13:10+00:00): Hallo Bernd,

motor_vehicle=permissive und vehicle=private passen auf 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36783047 

nicht zusammen. Wenn hier die Genehmigung des Besitzers benötigt wird, würde ich das bei 'private' belassen. 

Beste Grüße, Limes
berndw (2022-03-23 09:01:44+00:00): Oops, übersehen.

Am oberen Ende steht Vz 250 mit Zusatz "Frei bis ...", das gilt dann bistum Wohnhaus mit gestern offener Schränke, In Rheinbretbach steht Vz 250 und frei mit Genehmigung des Eigentümer. 
Das wird Richtung Hohenunkel noch mal an der Abzweigung wiederholt. 

Werde es wieder auf die vorherigen Werte setzen,
Bernd
berndw (2022-03-23 09:27:05+00:00): Ich hab das auf Grund der Beschilderung aus access=private gesetzt, was wohl auch die Intention des Eigentümers ist. der mittlere Teil zum Starenhaus ist ohne Beschränkungen, da dort von unten nichts steht, und der obere Teil ist destination, entsprechend der Beschilderung.

Wenn Du eine bessere Idee hast, gerne her damit

Bernd
berndw (2022-03-23 11:43:27+00:00): Korrektur, in Rheinbreitbach steht kein Vz 250, sondern ein Hinweis aus die Privatstrasse mit den Regeln
user_5359 (2022-03-23 07:28:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short info: the tag building=church says only the building looks like a church. If there is a living church please add also amenity=place_of_worship and religion (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-24 14:40:24+00:00): Please don't duplicate roads
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118793420
vojtechzaboril (2022-03-23 15:42:38+00:00): Hi, are you sure, that those settlements are farms? Looks kinda weird. In my opinion, they have to be tagged as residential instead of farmyard.
Thx
Vedran V (2022-03-24 06:54:22+00:00): Those are small households with houses, barns, garages, intermixed with orchards, allotments etc...
As OSM wiki says, landuse=residential is: "An area of land dedicated to, or having predominantly residential buildings such as houses or apartment buildings. "
vojtechzaboril (2022-03-24 07:11:38+00:00): In that case it looks ok
macaddr (2022-11-10 21:58:42+00:00): Cześć. Przeglądaj proszę dane które importujesz i konsultuj importy ze społecznością. Prawie każda apteka przez Ciebie dodana/zmodyfikowana w okolicy ma błędny tag name. Rozumiem, że cel importu był szczytny, ale to nie zmienia faktu, że takie importy trzeba przejrzeć żeby nie było "kwiatków" jak tutaj
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-24 14:35:56+00:00): Please don't use the live database to test
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118793681
user_4493657 (2022-03-23 10:11:35+00:00): Kolego drogi są wykorzystywane nie tylko przez rowery, ale też przez różne typy samochodów. Czy zdajesz sobie sprawę, ze podnoszenie kategorii dróg, a wiedze, że masz umiłowanie do tego typu edycji na skrajach jednostek administracyjnych, może (nie musi od razu) nakierować kierowców na miny i zniechęcić do korzystania z nawigacji opartych o dane OSM?
user_4493657 (2022-03-23 19:57:41+00:00): Dobra nie było tematu. Widze, że wiesz co robisz.
user_5359 (2022-03-23 07:55:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice your street isn't connected with existing highway, but is a oneway in the wrong direction. What is with the way https://www.osm.org/way/18239353? Is this also a oneway?

If you need help to correct this, You are welcome!
RTEA (2022-03-23 13:32:10+00:00): Thank you for the help. This was my first edit. I didn't know I could change the existing road or direction. The direction is counterclockwise. This is important for campers to know so they may get trailers and RVs into campsites.
pyrog (2024-04-22 17:16:16+00:00): Hi,
You added foot=no on this part of "Chemin de la Recluse".
Is it a mistake ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8450384

The next part of the street is restricted but possible.
See https://maps.app.goo.gl/zekkGURA5CdfHxaK8


Best regards,
Yves
pyrog (2024-04-22 17:19:28+00:00): Note: for the next part you change foot=no to foot=restricted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118794250

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222451388
wireguy (2022-04-24 12:28:53+00:00): jacob, several of these buildings are duplicates.   seems like the info should be combined and trimed.
jacobwhall (2022-04-24 14:29:23+00:00): Thanks for catching that wireguy! It can be difficult to see those types of errors in iD. I'll remove these this week
NieWnen (2022-03-25 22:49:09+00:00): Dlaczego nr drogi został usunięty i to tylko z fragmentu drogi?
Przecież był dodany jako unsigned_ref?
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 06:54:24+00:00): Zmieniłem tzn poprawiłem wg podziału terytorialnego
OLAFFAHI (2022-03-22 21:15:01+00:00): Thx 2 Georg (5359)
user_5359 (2022-03-23 07:56:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
Famlam (2022-03-22 21:43:58+00:00): *fietspaadje
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-11 05:26:04+00:00): Hey - it's me again.  This edit (and a few others I am sure) introduced a bunch of layer issues (it is 1 or -1 when it should be 0 for surface) which trigged a ton of KeepRight flags.
praeteritum (2023-03-23 06:09:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134006710.
praeteritum (2023-03-23 06:08:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134006679.
sander79 (2022-03-23 12:13:42+00:00): please do not remove the building from the bag import (Kadaster). Please restore the situation and add the extra keys on the existing object
Danysan95 (2022-03-24 11:00:23+00:00): Ciao, questo cancello blocca l'accesso soltanto alla strada agricola che parte verso nord o anche al sentiero? Se blocca solo l'accesso alla strada agricola va posizionato lungo la strada agricola, non nel nodo di intersezione, perchè come è inserito ora indica che il cancello blocca anche il proseguimento sul sentiero
surftrader (2022-03-24 23:01:21+00:00): Blocca solo la sterrata. Ho corretto. Ciao
tastrax (2022-03-28 05:55:50+00:00): There is currently of few folks cleaning up golf course tagging, predominately this is removing 'name' tagging on holes, greens and tees which is not required. You are likely to find that recent past edits that you have made will all get updated. It would be good if you could refrain from adding names to these objects into the future. Cheers
Jrachi (2022-03-23 09:30:55+00:00): ref:REI=ECNAS01000A
ref=S01
Uno dei due è sbagliato!
Probabilmente è sbagliato il ref:REI, l'ultimo carattere dovrebbe essere 0 non A!
Ciao.
Ivo
Leo Slager (2022-04-02 22:47:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3117101
Tomas Straupis (2022-03-23 07:50:54+00:00): Tai oficialūs duomenys. Pakeitimas (ištrynimas) atšauktas.
JeroenHoek (2022-03-23 07:22:08+00:00): Eigenlijk moet het amenity=grave_yard zijn voor een kerkhof: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dgrave_yard

(In tegenstelling tot een begraafplaats.)
JeroenHoek (2022-03-23 07:23:14+00:00): (Aangepast.)