piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
lyctkel (2023-11-21 11:07:47+00:00): Hallo lulach,
bei den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/302853572, 311745410 und 427988644 verwendest Du recycling:ct. Dies wird nur hier verwendet und ich würde es gerne an die aktuellen Konventionen in OSM anpassen. Kannst Du dich nach 15 Jahren noch erinneren, was damit gemeint war?
Vielen Dank und Gruss aus Holland,
lyctkel
marc__marc (2021-03-10 22:15:07+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez ajouté, il y a bien longtemps, le tag man_made=pipeline sur l'aqueduc alors que celui-ci avait le tag waterway=canal.
c'est contradictoire :
l'un est un tuyeau fermé, l'autre une structure à l'air libre.
pourriez-vous me préciser ce qu'il en est ?
Cordialement,
Marc
opendcc (2022-01-08 21:54:51+00:00): Hallo, Du hast da im Ebersberger Forst einen Friedhof eingetragen - siehe bitte mal die Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2951801 an. Danke
stefanct (2020-08-10 02:04:09+00:00): Ist ein bisschen lang her... aber was ist die Quelle für den Namen "Hermannskogelweg"? Die offizielle Bezeichnung scheint "Forstweg Agnesbründl" zu sein lt wien.gv.at/stadtplan und ich finde keine Quellen auf "Hermannskogelweg", die nicht auf OSM zurückgehen (könnten).
Talitha IRM-ED (2022-12-20 02:37:23+00:00): Hi, Willi2006. Thank you for your mapping contribution.
There's a crossing between a highway and waterway=dam (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/36922160). Is there a dam in this area? because it doesn't exist in any imagery. If you have local knowledge or you know the latest condition of this area, would you mind fixing it? or if you have any other suggestions please let me know.
Thank you and happy mapping!
aharvey (2017-11-23 00:04:26+00:00): On the LPI Base Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36925960 is named differently. Are you sure about your name here?
TheSwavu (2017-11-23 06:08:21+00:00): Street sign, G-NAF and LPI says Douglas Street. I think you can safely arm-chair this one.
marc__marc (2018-10-26 00:27:03+00:00): Hello,

about 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/429857400
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/508957811
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1313449842

what's our meaning of power=sub_station ?
according to the wiki, it's a depreacted tag with several meaning :
power=substation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsubstation
power=generator https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dgenerator
pipeline=substation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:pipeline%3Dsubstation

with the aerial imagery, it look like a power=substation but it's hard to guess it

Regards,
Marc
dino (2018-10-26 17:17:08+00:00): Hi, I have fixed the 3 nodes.
Hansekogge48 (2020-08-20 20:32:03+00:00): Hallo Cicane, 
kannst Du mir die Quelle des Namen 'Arbeitslosenweg' nennen?
Vielen Dank schon mal.
Gruß Hansekogge48
streckenkundler (2020-08-21 06:42:05+00:00): Hei,

der seltsame Name kam aber bereits mindestens mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14496969 vor gut 7 Jahren in die Datenbank...

Sven, ohne Gebietskenntnisse...
streckenkundler (2020-08-21 06:45:05+00:00): Ach und der der User hier ist auch seit 7 Jahren nicht mehr aktiv. ich mache mit da keine Hoffnungen...

ergänzt Sven
Hansekogge48 (2020-08-21 12:30:44+00:00): Hallo Sven,
danke für die Nachricht.
Die Eintragungen wurden alle vor 11 Jahren vorgenommen!
Im Deister hatte er auch Namen von Protagonisten aus dem RTL-Frühstücksfernsehen eingetragen, die ich mittlerweile gecancelt habe.
Ich versuche bereits Kontakt u.a. mit dem zuständigen Förster aufzunehmen. Sollte er mir die Namen "Arbeitslosenweg" und auch den "Spiegeleierweg" nicht bestätigen, werde ich diese Namen canceln und auch einige andere Wege überprüfen.
Gruß Uwe
streckenkundler (2020-08-21 13:06:06+00:00): Hei, ich schaue mir das Abend mit Josm mal an... bin zur Zeit unterwegs... aber im Moment sehe ich laut History, daß der Name Erwerbslosenweg mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14496969#map=13/52.2890/9.2462&layers=N von User Ralf2013 reinkam...
Aber ja...ein reichlich unglaubwürdiger Wegename...
Sven
streckenkundler (2020-08-21 17:17:53+00:00): ...So, mit JOSM angeschaut...
Ja, Schau dir mal die Chronik der Wege an (ich weiß nicht wie das mit iD geht, ich arbeite nur mit JOSM, ist aber im Link aber auch ersichtlich): z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199106510/history
Namen wie "Promilleweg", Arbeitslosenweg", "Erwerbslosenweg" sind mit den CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14496969 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14491956 reingekommen, durch User "Ralf2013" Das Edit von Chicane ist wesentlich älter...

Spiegeleierweg: soweit ich es sehe, könnte der Name mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14491956 reingekommen sein... Das ist der älteste Weg mit dem Namen, den ich sehen konnte. Schau die mal das fixme vom Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28771600 an... 
Du kannst ja mal den User DeisterWanderer anschreiben, er scheint Kontakte zu haben... dann geht ihr an "Putztour".

Von der Art und Weise könnten "Ralf2013" und "--Pennywise--" die selben Inkarnationen sein (=Sockenpuppen?)?

Gruß, Sven
Hansekogge48 (2020-08-26 14:19:34+00:00): Hallo Sven, 
am Montag hatte ich Kontakt zum Kreisforstamt Spießingshof aufgenommen.
Dort habe ich nun erfahren, dass alle Namen (Spiegeleiererweg, Erwerbslosenweg, Arbeitslosenweg, Promilleweg) alte, zum Teil aus der Zeit der Weimarer Republik stammende forstliche Wegebezeichnungen sind.
Wir können das Thema wohl abschließen.
Mit DeisterWanderer hatte ich Kontakt. Der Bückeberg gehört unterschiedlichen Besitzern und Forstverwaltungen.Daher die etwas andere Aussage von ihm.
Viele Grüße
Uwe
streckenkundler (2020-08-26 15:06:42+00:00): Hallo Uwe,

Aha! Sehr interessant, das hätte ich jetzt nicht gedacht, was es nicht alles gibt... Vielleicht sollte das irgendwo dokumentiert werden. Die Wegenamen sind ideal, diese als Honeypot anzusehen... (genauso wie ein Gewässer bei mir: die None; name=None)

Sven
wolfshafen (2024-10-01 12:25:41+00:00): Ich bin der Meinung, dass der Seewald-Parkplatz direkt neben der B30 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36976809) aus OSM entfernt werden sollte, da er nicht ausgeschildert und nur ordnungswidrig erreichbar ist: Sowohl die Seitenlinie der B30 als auch Linien auf beiden Seiten des Geh- und Radwegs sind durchgezogen, ein Abbiegen an dieser Stelle ist somit verboten.
wolfshafen (2024-10-01 12:29:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372622245
wolfshafen (2024-10-01 13:42:02+00:00): Einen offiziellen Parkplatz gibt es am Ende der Straße "Am Seewald" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372622245).
PWolf (2024-10-02 23:09:48+00:00): Der Eintrag des Parkplatzes stammt aus der Zeit als ich noch ab und zu im Seewald zugange war. Ob der Heute noch so gültig ist, kann ich nicht beurteilen. Fühle dich frei das richtig zu stellen.
Fred olsen (2023-12-09 01:24:05+00:00): Spencer Road is fully open. No bollard / restriction remains.
Can be checked with google streetview.
James Derrick (2023-12-10 13:20:46+00:00): Hi again,
The hard bit was finding the context of Spencer Road in the industrial estate!

Bing/ ESRI imagery suggests the bollard on the E end has been removed, so map updated.

(FYI - Google information can not be used for updates due to copyright. Bing, ESRI and some others explicitly donate licensing clearance to OSM.)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144964480

Happy Mapping,

James
marc__marc (2022-07-08 21:50:16+00:00): Hello,
diametre 14 meters ? if not, what's the meaning of 14 n ?
Regards,
Marc
marc__marc (2023-04-12 01:03:55+00:00): 14 inches ?
trigpoint (2023-04-12 08:58:23+00:00): It should be tagged as 14" as per OSM wiki for imperial measurements.

Cheers Phil
marc__marc (2023-04-25 23:51:47+00:00): fixed
marc__marc (2026-02-23 11:54:36+00:00): Hello,

you added diameter=12 in on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14823541
and diameter=10 in on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14823541
but those share a segment at the sud of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3408726708
can you review it ?
Regards,
Marc
GerdP (2015-10-21 07:59:58+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=rcn_ref on 
node 82756308 appears only once in OSM.
uvi (2016-12-25 12:36:01+00:00): Hallo , du hast vor einiger Zeit viel Arbeit in die Erfassung des FUSION-Festivalgeländes gesteckt. Bitte beachte doch mal diese Diskussion: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=623784#p623784 Es wäre doch schade, wenn aus den dort genannten Gründen eine Löschung erfolgt und die Daten verloren wären. Beste Grüße
Uwe
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-17 10:04:50+00:00): Sorry for bothering you about an extremely old changeset - but why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24435598#map=17/48.8813877/9.4018564layers=Nis not tagged as highway=steps? What is the meaning of steps=yes here? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/tPd for more cases (I considered armchair mapping it to highway=steps but I think that verification from local mappers is preferable)
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-26 18:26:46+00:00): When this administrative division existed? Is it a recent change or something not existing for a long time?
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:06:39+00:00): "><script>alert(1)</script>
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1702333
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:06:40+00:00): "><script>alert(1)</script>
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1702333
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:06:49+00:00): dsadsadsa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1702333
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:06:52+00:00): dsadsadsa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1702333
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:06:56+00:00): dsadsadsa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1702333
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:07:07+00:00): dsadsadsa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1702333
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:09:14+00:00): dsadsadsa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1702333
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:09:16+00:00): dsadsadsa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1702333
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-09 19:00:20+00:00): "Dead End to the Wall"? Please leave politics and vandalism out of OSM.
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-12 17:44:12+00:00): Discussion: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=650351#p650351
mcld (2015-08-30 21:37:30+00:00): Thanks for this, good mapping of this area
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-22 06:34:13+00:00): What is the license of data added here?

Have you discussed this import with anyone else in the community?

Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3569582 ?
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:46:45+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37147466
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:23:18+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84959157
Harel M (2021-04-16 20:55:38+00:00): I saw that the following way has too many nodes, it is possible for you to simplify it by removing some of the nodes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37154157/
Thanks!
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:46:24+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37155972,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37156957
have no tags. What are they?
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:19:39+00:00): dsadsadsa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1712945
mehmet8118 (2019-09-06 07:19:40+00:00): dsadsadsa
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/1712945
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:22:47+00:00): Removed and fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88222268 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107780012
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:45:49+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37157395
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:20:28+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88222268
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:45:12+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37159079
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:20:04+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107779925
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:44:25+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37162086
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:18:06+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107779831
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:43:37+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37163473
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:16:29+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107779759
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:37:19+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37166408
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:13:37+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58189618
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:36:54+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37168171
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:13:01+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107779610
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:36:20+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37168580,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37168680
have no tags. What are they?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:10:17+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88222051 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107779513
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:34:25+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37172640
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:08:07+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107779438
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:33:00+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37173394
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:06:22+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84959157
Erin76 (2019-02-01 09:17:04+00:00): Er was één node "artwork" met de naam vh museum. Ik heb dit gewijzigd door het ganse gebouw te taggen als museum en het de juiste naam te geven. De verschillende artworks op de site zelf hebben nog geen nodes
DaveF (2022-01-02 17:08:18+00:00): Hi
I'm attempting to tidy up NCN 3

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37327797/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37327795#map=20/50.21298/-5.30029&layers=C

A long time ago, but do you have any memory of these roads you created?
From aerial imagery it appears to have vehicular access from the South & maybe just a path from the North?
Gregory Williams (2022-01-02 20:54:15+00:00): This'll be the journey that it was part of:
http://threecornerscycleride.org.uk/2009/06/27/day-12/
I do have the surveying photos and GPX that I took, which seem to show Gurney Mews (way 37327795) as being a narrow service road with decorative paving stones. So I'd be tempted to adjust the highway=cycleway that's there now to a highway=service with surface=paving_stones (though a little difficult to judge exactly the extent of the surface). At the Commercial Street entrance to Cross Street my survey photo shows a short contraflow cycle lane and a No Motor Vehicles sign (without any exception panel) and some no-entry signs in Cross Street immediately after the junction with Gurney Mews.

I'll email over the GPX and photos that I have over for this stretch to the email address you use on the email lists.
dikkeknodel (2019-03-26 18:53:51+00:00): Hi KDS,
In this changeset you positioned the Tüfels Chilen viewpoint node exactly on the Tüfels Chilen limestone deposit, which is a protected area not to be accessed according to the signs around it. Since a viewpoint implies that people can stand there, while looking at something else, this seems not the most appropriate tagging or location. 
I suggest to tag it as waterfall instead, since it it sort of a waterfall. If you want to remain it as a viewpoint, it should be on the path.
What do you think?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
kds_ch (2019-03-28 09:49:50+00:00): Hi dikkenodel
i think the best is to tag the waterfall and the viewpoint seperatly.
Greetings Marcel
dikkeknodel (2019-03-28 21:08:56+00:00): Hi Marcel,
Thanks for the reply. I changed it as follows:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68643844
Cheers,
Raymond
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-05-06 05:51:28+00:00): I just modified the object based on Maxar Premium Imagery
eggie (2017-03-29 22:02:34+00:00): Beter laat dan nooit...

 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2019-11-02 09:39:00+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
kreuzschnabel (2019-05-23 06:08:28+00:00): Hi Andy, where did you get the elevation of Carlton Bank, accurate to 100 nanometers? Honestly, I think 407.9 is fully sufficient :) 

The exact value as given is rendered on the OpenTopoMap: https://opentopomap.org/#map=17/54.41609/-1.20143
SomeoneElse (2019-12-11 00:13:48+00:00): Interestingly, I've been at the top of Carlton Bank twice in the last few weeks and the GPS barometer reckoned that it was at 400m and 413m - so not quite within 100nm!
kreuzschnabel (2019-12-11 07:03:48+00:00): :D
 
I’ve seen ele-tags on motorway nodes in Germany in the flattest region ever, the carriageways differing up to 20 metres – each accurate to 9 decimals.
aharvey (2019-04-19 12:08:24+00:00): Hey mate you've placed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/441519460 in the middle of the ocean, was that an error?
aharvey (2019-04-19 12:16:13+00:00): Not to worry, I've deleted this one in place of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353119649
Constable (2018-04-04 07:34:59+00:00): ciao, vedo che la tua modifica è molto vecchia, però ora questa baita risulta in una posizione poco verosimile, magari conosci la zona e riesci a spostare questo nodo in corrispondenza dell'edificio che la ospita.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/441600964
Grazie!
MoTaBi (2020-06-20 08:18:02+00:00): Ich vermute, dass hier motovehicle=destination korrekt wäre, habe aber keine Ortskenntnis....
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-23 08:21:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/442457199/history has amenity = water that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
amenity=water? What is this?

If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typically
used.

man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.

man_made=water_tap with drinking_water=no is typically used to indicate
tap without drinking water

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=water
rurseekatze (2024-10-28 21:46:58+00:00): I used amenity=water back then because there was no better tag. I am not sure if I remember correctly after all the years, but it should be a watering place like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Dachwasserbrunnen.jpg, so amenity=watering_place should be the correct tag. If is definitely not a water tap like man_made=drinking_fountain or man_made=water_tap. I guess this feature can be seen in this image in the right center: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1f/Jagdhausalm01.JPG.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-03 20:28:36+00:00): maybe natural=spring ...
Dzertanoj (2017-12-12 20:30:42+00:00): Откуда информация, что здесь http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37729435/history действительно была ветка железной дороги? Ни на одной исторической карте ее нет. На местности есть только насыпь, так что возможно, ветку собирались построить и не построили.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-24 06:54:45+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3647399 ?

(I know, that is an ancient edit)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-22 20:06:13+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of us.fo:Galdandi_frá tag? Can it be safely removed nowadays?

This tag (and some other) are mentioned at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/usfo but without any explanation
LiFo (2024-02-24 15:01:51+00:00): Yes you can delete them. Except us.fo:Adressutal. I use that to sync with official addresses
LiFo (2024-02-24 15:05:06+00:00): Galdandi means "valid from" it is the date the address is created or changed
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-26 16:55:03+00:00): Would you be fine with posting following at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/dk/77 ? :




Faroe islands address metadata cleanup - proposed mass edit

Faroe islands address import added some tags present in original database that are not really needed in OSM.

I propose to remove them. Specifically, I propose to remove

- us.fo:Galdandi_frá=*
- us.fo:kommununr=*
- us.fo:Postnr=*
- us.fo:Veganr=* 
- us.fo:Eindir=*
- us.fo:Býlingsnr=*
- us.fo:Eindir=*
- us.fo:Býlingsnr=*

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1888617 - original import author is fine with such edit

(if anyone is curious how I run into these tags: it happened as part of work on OpenStreetMap editor when verifying state of  some unhandled tags. These tags are now handled but saving time for other people being confused by them seems a good idea to me, even if takes some extra effort right now)
LiFo (2024-02-26 18:57:59+00:00): No problem. 
i need to update the import catalog page page, it is really outdated.
i have updated my import program to not include those in new addresses. but i see that i need to also update changed  addresses.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-26 21:25:23+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/faroe-islands-address-metadata-cleanup-proposed-mass-edit/109790
borovac (2023-02-08 08:43:04+00:00): Hi ilari,
Could you please verify this information. The name you added is different from the government data, there may be a possibility that the name has been changed in the meantime.
All best Milan (borovac)
dieterdreist (2024-08-15 16:22:10+00:00): Hi, I know this is a long time ago, just noticed visiting Fabriano that there are no signs at the vicoli like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37918958 so I don’t think they can be considered pedestrian, do you remember or know the area?
Eric S (2024-08-17 15:54:52+00:00): Hi, I made de round trip in the city while waiting for train connexion. Mainly, I would suggest you to get in touch with local community for street classification. Although not strictly pedestrian (no traffic sign at entrance), some of them are not likely to be use by car. For such historical narrow streets, one may also use highway=service + service=alley. The point is that if local contributors (I'm from France, not local) didn't changed my classification for 15 years, they should agree with it.
dieterdreist (2024-08-17 16:26:32+00:00): Hi Eric,

thank you for your reply, and sorry for bothering you with stuff from 2009 (I also have been around by that time and am aware how few we had settled and defined compared to now). Yes, we are currently discussing about alleys, because there is no ideal tagging (the combination with service is disputed because these are not seen as service roads). I think it is relevant to correctly tag them because even if cars don’t pass (regular sized ones), motorcycles regularly use them (residents), and it is legal. 

Do similar situations occur in rural France as well (narrow roads in settlements where motorcycles can legally drive)?

Cheers 
Martin
Eric S (2024-08-19 08:32:37+00:00): In historical parts of cities, similar to Fabriano, such areas tend to be officially pedestrian.

In rural areas, there may not be a clear distinction between streets and tracks. For instance:

https://osm.org/go/0CArhUgbc--

Also, snow may change the status:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=537473680970895