piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hoserab (2018-08-28 18:24:54+00:00): I just went ahead and made some changes (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62080555). Feel free to double-check my work. Thanks.
inah_telenav (2018-08-30 06:21:21+00:00): Just looked over what you sent. Fount a newer OSC image and I see that you were right. 
Thanks
Jakka (2018-08-29 11:57:27+00:00): Street became oneway... Is this also for bicycles, mopped_A or oyhers ?
BrtD (2018-08-29 12:47:36+00:00): No, bicycles (and equivalent) on a two way cycle lane at one side of the road. I'll take a quick look on it next Monday to be sure.
BrtD (2018-09-03 11:49:32+00:00): Indeed, two directions for bikes. I changed it.
Commodoortje (2018-08-27 19:14:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
aceman444 (2022-04-01 07:13:41+00:00): Hi, please check the history of the object next time. This node wasn't dragged it was at intended position.
ma-rt-in (2018-08-27 21:00:50+00:00): Hallo, warum sollte dies die falsche hw-klasse sein?
gabro00 (2018-08-27 10:48:26+00:00): Pontosabban Zákányszék határában.
itineris (2020-03-10 12:18:57+00:00): Szia!

Kérlek, ha megfordítod egy út irányát (a oneway=-1 miatt, nagyon helyesen), akkor a kapcsolódó címkéken is fordítsd meg a forward/backward irányokat, illetve a kapcsolat szerepekben is!
(Az iD ezt automatikusan megteszi, a JOSM a jelek szerint nem.)

Az M86-oson most meggyógyítottam az útdíjas irányokat.

Üdv:
Ákos
GBAB (2020-03-10 13:26:46+00:00): Szia Ákos!

Bocs. Azt hittem, van ennyi esze a JOSM-nak, de ezek szerint illett volna leellenőrizni.
Kösz a megtákolását!

Gábor
atcomapper (2018-08-27 14:27:30+00:00): Jeg mindes ikke der er skiltet med ensretning her
DK7080BE (2018-08-27 18:22:12+00:00): Der er heller ikke skiltet med ensretning, nord for rundkørslen. Er default ikke ensretning ved cykelstier langs veje. Hvis cykelstien var dobbeltrettet ville man så ikke skilte med det som her i den anden side af Lilholtvej: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.63493452633942&lng=9.64237975961493&z=17&pKey=dqZ2_P0s7-_LUxSKPYDN1A&focus=photo
atcomapper (2018-08-27 18:50:18+00:00): Tjo måske, men ud fra den logik burde https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372517140 jo også være skiltet med dobbeltrettet?
DK7080BE (2018-08-27 19:11:15+00:00): Den cykelsti er jo et stykke væk fra vejen og der er jo ikke cykelsti i begge sider. Så vidt jeg læser rundkørslen, så er cykelstien ikke en del af rundkørslen. Hvis man på cykel kommer fra Mølleparken og vil til Lilholtvej, skal man benytte rundkørslen og ikke nogen af cykelstierne.
BCNorwich (2018-08-27 17:47:49+00:00): Hi I removed your industrial area from within an industrial area, it's duplication.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:13:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:13:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:13:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:13:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:13:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:13:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:13:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 10:13:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Leo Slager (2018-08-27 20:19:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2018-08-27 20:23:30+00:00): Access=* is geen geldige waarde.
Je kunt dat opzoeken in de wiki.
Leo Slager (2018-08-27 20:45:45+00:00): Helaas lag de oorzaak ergens anders.
Iemand heeft de slagbomen van de beide bruggen voorzien van de tag barrier=liftgate. En dat blokkeert alle verkeer over de beide bruggen.
De brug is correct met layer=1
dvdhoven (2018-08-28 07:09:42+00:00): In Zutphen zitten al een aantal jaren ook tags met barrier=liftgate op de Oude IJsselbrug en daar heb ik nog nooit een note voor langs zien komen of op een andere manier gehoord dat het niet routeerde. Alleen staat daar er een access tag bij met access=yes en kennelijk werkt dat
Leo Slager (2018-08-28 07:35:50+00:00): Dan zou de fout dus in de navigatie-app kunnen zitten.
De ingebouwde Graphhopper kan wel over de brug en OSRM kan geen route vinden.
eggie (2018-08-28 07:56:31+00:00): Dacht dat barrier= gate en lift_gate gewoon routeert zonder access tags. .. maar kan me vergissen. De industrieterreinen Dordtse Kil en Moerdijk zijn ook voorzien van lift_gates. Kan alleen nu niet checken of er access tags opstaan. (Routering generic routable)
eggie (2018-08-28 08:12:18+00:00): Op de zuidelijke randweg industriegebied moerdijk is het kennelijk nu een hek geworden. Zal zo n schuifhek zijn voor het weekend en nacht.  Dat routeert niet meer. Wellicht geen access yes of de bijbehorende conditional tags erop. Kan nu niet kijken. Wel even gecheckt met mapsource. Geen goed internet hier.
eggie (2018-08-28 08:19:10+00:00): Lift gates industrie Dordtse Kil III routeren gewoon in generic routable.. weet niet of er access tags staan.
eggie (2018-08-28 08:38:47+00:00): Hier even een note gezet bij dat schuifhek voor nacht en weekend ter lering ende vermaeck. Het routeert hier niet..  Dat zou eigenlijk wel moeten https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/51.6569/4.5587&layers=N
Leo Slager (2018-08-28 08:44:10+00:00): geen access tags. En nu is het resultaat precies omgekeerd. OSRM routeert wel en Graphhopper routeert niet.
eggie (2018-08-28 08:52:41+00:00): Leo.. heb je het hier over moerdijk?
Leo Slager (2018-08-28 08:56:27+00:00): Ja. route over de rotonde en door de gate.
eggie (2018-08-28 09:05:18+00:00): Dan zullen in de verschillende routeplanners en ook de generic routable in garmin gps heel wat terreinen ontoegankekijk zijn.
Jack de Mepper (2018-08-29 10:11:40+00:00): OK bedankt voor het corrigeren van mijn wijziging en het aanpassen van de lift_gate met access=yes. Dat lijkt inderdaad de juiste oplossing te zijn, al is dat nog niet direct zichtbaar via diverse online OSM route planners, waarschijnlijk vanwege kaart updates. Beetje lastig controleren op deze manier helaas.
4004 (2018-09-02 23:12:21+00:00): добавил тип обьекта
rainerU (2018-08-28 10:39:11+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans la communauté OSM des P.O.

Tu as ajouté des parkings. C'est bien, mais pour être parfait, il faudrait les connecter au réseau routier par des chemins du type highway=service. Tu peux prendre exemple sur le parking E.Zola, où je l'ai fait.
mairielesoler (2018-08-28 12:13:24+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour l'information et l'exemple j'ajoute la connexion au réseau routier existant
robert (2018-08-27 23:10:12+00:00): Hi - did you mean to remove the name "Lockhart Road" from here in this edit? It's broken a match against Ordnance Survey's Locator dataset: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=906615
ravsjith (2018-08-28 12:46:56+00:00): hi,
created the residential road with name "Lockhart Road".
thanks
RicoElectrico (2018-08-27 22:44:25+00:00): Cześć i dzięki za dołożenie kolejnej cegiełki do mapy :)

Dwie sprawy - edytor Potlatch jest przestarzały i  nierozwijany, lepiej użyć iD
- jeśli nie ma opłaty to dajemy fee=no, a nie fee=Free. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:fee
dazerine (2018-11-30 01:14:10+00:00): El edificio es un rectángulo, que este changeset ha borrado. La forma de hueso es sólo la cubierta, como estaba detallado building:part=roof.
Digne (2018-09-21 14:09:25+00:00): Dag Thibaud,

Je hebt hier een complete sloot in een stuw omgezet. Ik heb dat terug gedraaid.
Thibaud (2018-09-21 19:14:35+00:00): dat was zeker niet de bedoeling. Geen idee hoe dat kwam. Bedankt
kreuzschnabel (2019-01-02 23:07:33+00:00): Hi, in this changeset http://osm.org/way/40380442 has been retagged surface=compacted + tracktype=grade1. This is rather unusual, as grade1 means solid surfaces like concrete, asphalt, paving stones or similar. Compacted surfaces in good order are grade2.
gurglypipe (2019-01-04 11:53:25+00:00): I guess I didn’t read the tracktype documentation closely enough. grade2 might be slightly more appropriate than grade1, though it’s a really heavy duty grouse track now. You could cycle a road bike up it.
gurglypipe (2019-01-04 11:55:24+00:00): Actually, I think I was using the descriptions of the tracktype values from ID, which describes grade1 as “Solid: paved or heavily compacted hardcore” and grade2 as “Mostly Solid: gravel/rock with some soft material mixed in”.
gurglypipe (2019-01-04 12:01:48+00:00): Tweaked in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66018892.
kreuzschnabel (2019-01-12 08:14:50+00:00): cheers :)
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 12:13:12+00:00): This member corrupt the names. War edits. Mechanical edits.
Dinamik (2018-08-29 12:33:30+00:00): Check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179167 : "Наименование: Нижнее Большое Суздальское озеро". 
Check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179168 : "Наименование: Среднее Суздальское озеро"
Check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179170 : "Наименование: Верхнее Суздальское озеро"
See comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931


 See comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 19:17:30+00:00): rgis SPb not valid source for toponim.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 05:55:58+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/62103990
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:44:07+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:52:49+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 12:13:29+00:00): This member corrupt the names. War edits. Mechanical edits.
Dinamik (2018-08-29 12:34:56+00:00): Please, describe the problem with this edit.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:43:58+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:52:14+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
user_3012156 (2018-09-06 01:50:36+00:00): Es ist wieder typisch, das ein User wie d_berger kommen muss und Eintragungen von mir abändert. Man fragt nicht nach, diskutiert es auch nicht aus, nein, man schiesst einfach wieder mal rein. Deine Änderungen wurden wieder berichtigt. Deine Art und Weise nennt man übrigens Arroganz! Sollten meine Erfassungen wieder durch Dich geändert werden, werde ich erneut einen Moderator informieren müssen. Ich werde dieses mal aber das Headquartier über Deine Art und Weise informieren und Deine Sperrung verlangen.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 12:13:40+00:00): This member corrupt the names. War edits. Mechanical edits.
Dinamik (2018-08-29 12:36:29+00:00): http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179171 : "Наименование: Долгое озеро". 
See comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 19:18:25+00:00): rgis SPb not valid source for toponim.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 05:56:22+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/62103990
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:43:50+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:51:54+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 12:13:48+00:00): This member corrupt the names. War edits. Mechanical edits.
Dinamik (2018-08-29 12:36:58+00:00): Please, describe the problem with this edit.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:43:43+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:49:53+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
freebeer (2018-11-01 23:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64096797 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me private home Mi Casa hotel
DaveF (2018-08-27 14:21:35+00:00): Hi

From aerial imagery, that looks like a private driveway to me. Do you have local knowledge?
yaswap (2019-07-10 08:15:28+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit and apologies for the delayed response. The editor just extended the already existing segment. Yes, that should be a driveway. We will follow your suggestions going forward.

yaswap on behalf of amrisham(inactive user)
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 12:13:54+00:00): This member corrupt the names. War edits. Mechanical edits.
Dinamik (2018-08-29 12:38:34+00:00): http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179173 : "Наименование: Щучье озеро". 
See comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 19:19:00+00:00): rgis SPb not valid source for toponim.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 05:56:59+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/62103990
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:43:36+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:49:36+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 12:14:00+00:00): This member corrupt the names. War edits. Mechanical edits.
Dinamik (2018-08-29 12:39:00+00:00): Please, describe the problem with this edit.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:43:27+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:47:12+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
abrensch (2018-08-28 06:13:45+00:00): Hallo hilgerdenaar,

hier liegt die Bundesstrasse B189 jetzt teilweise doppelt unsichtbar aufeinander. Kannst Du da nochmal schauen?
raanedreglih (2018-08-28 08:46:13+00:00): Jetzt sollte es passen. Danke für den Hinweis.
felipeeugenio (2018-08-27 17:05:52+00:00): Hola. «retiro de llaves» es donde queda el hotel?
andrewwiseman (2018-08-27 18:27:25+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. It is best to add the name of the building to the building itself, not an address
atcomapper (2018-08-27 14:26:04+00:00): Does the sign look like this: https://kombiskilte.dk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/E53-1.gif ?

If it does, then the speed limit is 50, not 30. Square, blue signs indicate advisory speed limits, not hard speed limits.

For it to be a hard speed limit, the sign must look like this: https://static.webshopapp.com/shops/066605/files/046795858/30-km-area-sticker-e10a1-30.jpg

If the blue sign is present, please change the maxspeed here to 50 km/h
Lt_Grillwurst (2018-08-28 18:31:41+00:00): The sign looks like the first blue one. I did it wrong then. Sorry, I did not know that traffic rule.
atcomapper (2018-08-28 18:32:48+00:00): In that case the ways should be tagged like this:

maxspeed=50
source:maxspeed=DK:urban
maxspeed:advisory=30
Lt_Grillwurst (2018-09-03 10:56:21+00:00): I fixed the changes according to your suggestion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62243427
viloan (2018-08-27 13:40:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-08-27 13:56:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PT-53 (2018-11-06 09:44:26+00:00): Hallo N_SCHW,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz versehentlich an der Abt-Walter-Straße den Namen gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157976703/history
Ich habe den Namen heute wieder eingetragen.
N_SCHW (2018-11-16 12:54:46+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
danke
BCNorwich (2018-08-27 18:04:32+00:00): hi I removed the building tag from the area outline, drew in the building and adjusted tags.
ndm (2018-08-27 15:15:23+00:00): Is this residential or service?
mrfa (2018-08-27 15:31:03+00:00): modified the service road at galingale way as residential road
dmlu (2018-08-28 17:44:50+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I added shop=car_repair to the node you created, that way the shop is correctly rendered. Thank you for participating!
mrlanduse (2018-08-27 14:40:10+00:00): This is a revert of 20+ changesets of user "M!dgard". I consider splitting the same work into multiple changeset to hamper detection and possible revertion not as a good faith edit.
Regards
RussNelson (2018-08-27 20:21:05+00:00): I agree. People are too ready to delete things based on aerial photographs without regard for the original editor who went to the place, and added a feature because he saw it.
M!dgard (2018-09-14 23:55:59+00:00): > either line=bay or line=busbar, information was deleted by M!dgard

---

This is not true. You can view in the object's edit history that it was line=substation. This tag is not documented anywhere and it's not obvious, it's not clear what it should mean.
So I removed it to stop it from showing up as a suggestion in editors. iD suggests tags based on usage and nothing else, so this is the only way.
M!dgard (2018-09-15 00:08:34+00:00): @RussNelson: I think you should know that I didn't remove any features, only an attribute tag that wasn't useful to anyone because it was undefined.
M!dgard (2018-09-15 00:24:37+00:00): By the way, the tag power=bay you're adding everywhere is incorrect in a lot (probably most) of the cases. The bay only starts where the lines connect to the stuff in the substation, not at the last tower.

This CS has been reverted in https://osm.org/way/569616493
M!dgard (2018-09-15 01:20:20+00:00): I mean in https://osm.org/changeset/62598739 .

Re: "splitting the same work to hamper detection": I zoomed in to look at the individual regions before making the change, and did some other maintenance. I then proceeded to upload, then purge those objects. That, and avoiding to clutter the global history tab, were my motives to create small changesets.
letihu (2019-02-09 20:28:55+00:00): Warum werden hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97221952/history
alle tags entfernt, ohne einen nachvollziehbaren Kommentar?
öreg (2019-02-10 17:26:30+00:00): Wenn ich das war, war kein Absicht. Die Linie müsste die Aussengrenze des ehemaligen russischen Militärflugplatzes sein. Wenn schöneres Wetter kommt, kann ich wieder hinradeln und abradeln. Diese Linie habe ich noch nie als ganzes abgeradelt.
letihu (2019-02-10 21:14:12+00:00): Du warst es garnicht. Entschuldigung.
Hier haben schon andere dranrumgewerkelt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58396491#map=2/21.4/1.8
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59471236#map=2/26.3/23.5
Das muß vielleicht noch wieder richtig in Ordnung gebracht werden.
viloan (2018-08-27 15:26:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
trigpoint (2018-08-27 21:18:33+00:00): Hi, you seem to have added a network of roads here to which you have not added any access tags. There really should be some, clearly there are Health and Safety issues with routing through farmyards.
I assume you have inside knowledge of where deliveries are to be made, so you will be able to sensibly apply restrictions.
Cheers Phil
soumybha (2018-08-28 11:10:26+00:00): Thanks a lot for your valuable feedback.But our associate has been routed through that road and its safe as per his feedback
trigpoint (2018-08-28 11:18:32+00:00): Thank you for your reply, however this needs access tags.
soumybha (2018-08-28 11:34:06+00:00): what kind of access tags are you suggesting?kindly share
trigpoint (2018-08-28 11:44:32+00:00): In this case I would assume access=private
soumybha (2018-08-28 11:50:51+00:00): thanks a lot..but with the resources availiable  in OSM, i am not able to confirm whether to give it private or not..i hope you understand my dilemma
soumybha (2018-08-28 12:01:54+00:00): i have talked to my superior and changed the access..thanks for your information
Baloo Uriza (2018-08-29 03:19:14+00:00): Geometry could use a little work but otherwise not bad.  A steady hand and switching to JOSM may help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62043905
Hernan (2018-08-27 19:45:12+00:00): Borraste el tipo de relacion. Por favor no eliminar etiquetas sin leer como debe hacerse wikidata=Q1847701
wikipedia=es:Adolfo Gonzales Chaves
Jørn-osm (2018-09-05 20:21:47+00:00): Ændringssæt: 62044116 og 62044096 er ens.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62044116
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62044096

Thorvaldsensvej 32A findes dermed to gange.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5861301287/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5861294289/history

Thorvaldsensvej 32B findes dermed to gange.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5861289886/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5861301288/history
atcomapper (2018-09-06 13:55:00+00:00): Tak, det er rettet. Det kan ske hvis et postnummer opdateres to gange kort efter hinanden, da OSM's API tager et par minutter om at blive opdateret, og autoAWS derfor ikke kan opdage, at ændringen allerede er gået igennem. Problemet opstår derfor typisk i meget små postnumre, hvis en adresse er flyttet fra et postnummer fra et andet - men det bliver rettet helt automatisk ved næste opdatering af pågældende postnummer.
freebeer (2018-08-27 21:48:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62052729 where the changeset comment is: revert widespread vandalism
freebeer (2018-08-27 21:51:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62052775 where the changeset comment is: revert widespread vandalism
freebeer (2018-08-27 21:53:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62052810 where the changeset comment is: revert widespread vandalism
freebeer (2018-08-27 21:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62052824 where the changeset comment is: revert widespread vandalism