piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2018-01-05 23:30:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-06 11:20:20+00:00): Hi Fran Hervas. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset? Thanks. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55182251
avm (2018-05-14 07:20:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58941943 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism - Deletion of all ways of a city
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-25 16:48:40+00:00): Hier wurde agricultural=yes (Traktor frei) gesetzt. Das traffic_sign sagt aber Zusatzzeichen 1026-36, das ist landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei. Dies ist mit Access=agricultural zu taggen. 
Absicht oder bist du dem im Wiki sogar erwähnten "Häufigem Fehler" unterlegen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202376899
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-06 11:21:54+00:00): Hi Fran Hervas. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset? Thanks. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55182912
avm (2018-05-14 07:20:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58941907 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism - Deletion of all ways of a city
viloan (2018-01-05 10:23:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-06 11:22:18+00:00): Hi Fran Hervas. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset? Thanks. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55182599
avm (2018-05-14 07:19:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58941854 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism - Deletion of all ways of a city
Suo5eaFi (2018-03-19 22:07:48+00:00): @gsperb: Ich finde, du solltest die Diskussion "circular" vs. "roundabout" zumindest mitbekommen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1325092
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-06 11:21:27+00:00): Hi Fran Hervas. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset? Thanks. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55182762
avm (2018-05-14 07:16:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58941782 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism - Deletion of all ways of a city
viloan (2018-01-05 10:32:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-06 11:22:48+00:00): Hi Fran Hervas. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset? Thanks. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55182912
avm (2018-05-14 07:14:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58941767 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism - Deletion of all ways of a city
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-06 11:23:15+00:00): Hi Fran Hervas. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset? Thanks. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55182979
avm (2018-05-14 07:13:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58941754 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism - Deletion of all ways of a city
mbethke (2018-01-08 06:51:47+00:00): "See schön", is that actually the place's name?
maraf24 (2018-01-05 15:09:01+00:00): Widzę, że dodajesz do bunkrów landuse=military.
Czy chcesz przez to powiedzieć, że należą one do wojska?
babu2 (2018-01-05 18:14:12+00:00): Obiekty nie należą do wojska, jednak historycznie są to budowle o wojskowej proweniencji, więc takie oznaczenie wydaje się najbardziej odpowiednie. Niestety, w opcjach dostępnych do wyboru, nie występuje określenie schron, które by tu najbardziej pasowało. Bunkier to błędne określenie. Jednak w tym przypadku jest ono najbardziej zbliżone znaczeniowo do prawidłowego określenia jakim jest wspomniany wyżej schron.
maraf24 (2018-01-05 20:39:49+00:00): landuse=military jest błędne z dwóch powodów:
1.oznacza się tak tereny aktualnie używane do celów wojskowych
2. landuse w ogóle nie stosuje się do budynków

Najbardziej pasuje historic=bunker. Kwestia bunkier/schron nie jest w tym wypadku istotna - w OSM często brzemienie klucza nie oddaje dokładnie obiektu który opisuje. Trzeba przeczytać wiki, by wiedzieć, jak rozumieć dane słowo.
Tutaj można dodawać jakiś własny, wymyślony tag na oznaczenie innego typu budowli. W zasadzie mogłoby to też być jako building=shelter.
babu2 (2018-01-05 20:44:27+00:00): Poprawię na Bunkier. Innej opcji chyba nie ma.
I przy okazji pytanie: Jest możliwość podłożenia jako tła mapy lidarowej (ISOK) z geoportalu? Schrony to obiekty przykryte nasypem, więc najdokładniej będzie obrysować je właśnie po sylwetce nasypu, a tego na zwykłej ortofotomapie po prostu nie widać.
maraf24 (2018-01-05 21:23:03+00:00): W edytorze iD nie da się podpiąć tła ISOK, chyba żebyś uruchomił jakąś konwersję w locie (np. poprzez MapProxy).
Prościej zainstalować i nauczyć się JOSMa.
Ewentualnie możesz podpiąć w iD obraz ekranu wcześniej ściągnięty z Geoportalu.
babu2 (2018-01-05 21:25:58+00:00): OK, coś wymyślę. Dzięki za porady.
Ps. Obiekty poprawiłem na „bunkry”.
mueschel (2018-01-06 15:11:05+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way, it looks like it was uploaded by mistake:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551037479

Cheers, Jan
Axelos (2018-01-06 22:39:38+00:00): Hello.
Exact, it's error. I deleting the way.
Thanks, Axel.
mdp223 (2019-07-24 19:19:39+00:00): This change created this relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7877110
which I think is wrong because it's not "really" administrative and overlay the regular "Nancy" administrative area.

Consequence is that search for 54000 leads to wrong results:
https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search?country=fr&postalcode=54000&addressdetails=1&format=json
Axelos (2019-07-25 05:30:26+00:00): For searching bundary city, you add tag admin_level=8
mdp223 (2019-07-25 17:24:19+00:00): This relation is not an "administrative" boundary. And it overlays the valid administrative boundary for 54000.
Axelos (2019-07-25 18:37:01+00:00): Hello,

Source boundary quartier de Nancy : http://opendata.grand-nancy.org/jeux-de-donnees/detail-dune-fiche-de-donnees/?tx_icsoddatastore_pi1%5Buid%5D=113
mdp223 (2019-07-25 19:44:09+00:00): Bonjour, je suis désolé mais il s'agit la de "quartiers" et non pas de limites *administratives*.
Les découpages administratifs sont disponibles ici :
http://opendata.grandnancy.eu/?eID=ics_od_datastoredownload&file=201
(Découpages administratifs des communes du Grand Nancy)

À ce titre, la seule zone légitime à porter le code postal 54000 s'appelle Nancy et qu'elle est ici :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/52399
Peut-être retirer la mention de code-postal à ce quartier suffirait à résoudre le problème ?
Axelos (2019-07-25 20:19:22+00:00): Bonsoir,

Je ne comprends pas la demande ! Le quartier n'a pas d'attribut qui indique un code postal. C'est juste nominatim qui interprète les éléments présents dans la limite communale. En claire le problème n'est pas dans la base, mais dans l'outil qui l'exploite.
muzirian (2019-01-04 15:08:23+00:00): hi please map features on the ground.
Do not map imaginary things.
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-06 11:23:42+00:00): Hi Fran Hervas, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset? Thanks. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55182979
avm (2018-05-14 07:10:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58941654 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism - Deletion of all ways of a city
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-04 20:51:47+00:00): Is it intentional that "wikipedia=fr:Algérie Poste" was used instead of correct in this case "brand:wikipedia=fr:Algérie Poste"?
pangoSE (2020-01-20 14:00:41+00:00): Hi, this changeset added image= with a manual link to wikimedia commons. This is incorrect. Images to commons should always use  wikimedia_commons= e.g. wikimedia_commons=File:AlgeriePoste.svg in this case.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-01-22 18:53:14+00:00): image= with a manual link to wikimedia commons is not wrong, though using wikimedia_commons may be better

"This is incorrect. Images to commons should always use"  - this is not true. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like
pangoSE (2020-01-22 19:04:15+00:00): I disagree, it is a bad idea to link directly to a commons image as it makes it harder for data users to select the resolution of the image that suits their application best. Restricting use of image= tags to other images where no dedicated tag exist (like mapillary, flickr, wikimedia_commons) is the best from a data perspective.
I'm not saying that people won't continue to put whatever in the image tags, but this should be cleaned up IMO.
pangoSE (2020-01-22 19:19:34+00:00): See also discussion here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-January/050532.html
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-01-05 11:59:22+00:00): Todas suas edições referentes a exclusões no centro de Brasília eu reverti, você excluiu inclusive trecho do buraco do tatu, por favor, tenha mais cuidado ao editar.
Hildson Ribeiro (2018-01-05 12:28:48+00:00): Eu não acabei a correção. As faixas estão demarcadas erradas. Da forma que foi feito é como se passassem em frente ao Conjunto Nacional e não por baixo.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-01-05 12:45:10+00:00): não entendi, as faixas estão demarcadas como tunel. Não delete nada mais.
Hildson Ribeiro (2018-01-05 12:49:56+00:00): Para mim aparecem sobre a praça. Não quero deletar. Estou tentando reposicionar, mas não estão baixando.
santamariense (2018-01-06 11:23:50+00:00): Se a via aparece tracejada é porque ela fica embaixo.
Hildson Ribeiro (2018-01-06 21:31:58+00:00): Não está funcionando assim. No aplicativo que uso esse trecho está passando sobre a praça do Conjunto Nacional.
santamariense (2018-01-06 21:51:50+00:00): E por que tu acha que tá passando em cima? Porque não mostra a praça tapando as vias? As estradas de baixo estão querendo fazer conversão para as de cima? Qual aplicação você usa?
Javier Sanchez (2018-01-26 20:41:09+00:00): En relación al etiquetado de colmenas, por favor visita esta página
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Tag:craft%3Dbeekeeper
user_5359 (2018-01-05 20:14:42+00:00): Hello! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead.
b-jazz (2018-10-14 19:55:18+00:00): Hi @Vangaurd. I did some work to clean up this area and thought I'd share some tips with you to prevent this type of mapping error in the future. When mapping out a big network of roads like this, it is critical that you don't double back on the road and reuse points in an effort to make it all with a single path. What you need to do is create a new highway/road/path for every junction and every spur road. That way, validation checks won't set of alerts and need to be remedied. Happy mapping. -- b-jazz
ivanbranco (2022-08-10 20:49:40+00:00): Hi Superadlen,

I don't think this is correct. The wikimedia_commons or image tag should be used for images representing the specific objects, not logos ecc, otherwise we would have the same image for every McDonald's and other shop chains.

The logo is already added in the NSI (https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=operators&k=amenity&v=post_office&tt=alg#algerieposte-e99ec0) as all others chains, I think is enough.

Do you agree?
ivanbranco (2022-10-01 22:59:40+00:00): update: all the wikimedia commons links have been deleted.
oba510 (2018-01-07 07:45:14+00:00): Hi, this seems to be an actual place and not a personal poi (if you look at the history it was imported 10 years ago from the GNIS).  I have restored it and converted it to a residential polygon around the condo complex
Adamant1 (2018-01-07 07:50:49+00:00): Oh cool. My bad. Thanks for doing that. I'll have to look through the history better next time.
maraf24 (2018-01-07 21:53:53+00:00): Skąd czerpiesz te wszystkie adresy?
vichada (2018-01-05 11:52:42+00:00): Again ... wrong changset comment and source. Source is mainly Bing Imagery.
mueschel (2018-01-06 12:12:29+00:00): Hi Andreia,
welcome to OSM! 
You used some tags like "srviços", "contactos" in your edits. 
This might be a good description of the object, but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand it. Only tags that are described in the wiki or are available in the menues in the editor should be used. Some of these tags in your edits might be 'phone' or 'description'. 
Would you mind adapting these? Let us (e.g. on the forums) know if you need help!
Jan
Rodrigo Rega (2018-01-07 18:11:06+00:00): Hola,

He revertido tus conjuntos de cambios #55184811 y #55184844 ya que habías eliminado la escultura de la medusa.

En próximas ocasiones te rogaría que tuvieses cuidado para que no se pierda ningún dato que figura en el mapa.

Gracias por tus aportaciones al mapa.
Rodrigo Rega (2018-01-07 18:10:58+00:00): Hola,

He revertido tus conjuntos de cambios #55184811 y #55184844 ya que habías eliminado la escultura de la medusa.

En próximas ocasiones te rogaría que tuvieses cuidado para que no se pierda ningún dato que figura en el mapa.

Gracias por tus aportaciones al mapa.
Владимир К (2018-01-12 10:46:24+00:00): и тут тоже
roptat (2018-01-06 07:22:46+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM !

Ta modification me semble correcte, mais en France il est possible d'utiliser l'imagerie aérienne de l'IGN plus précise (mais pas forcément plus récente). : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Sources_de_donn%C3%A9es_potentielles/France#IGN_BDOrtho.

Merci pour cette contribution !
frosm (2018-01-09 18:36:20+00:00): Bonjour,
est-ce que la rue porte réelement ce nom là ? est-ce que le no concerne tous les bâtiments ? généralement on met le no sur le bâtiment concerné. si c'est une petite rue qui désert quelques bâtiments, c'est probablement une highway=service service=driveaway
GanZ06 (2018-01-09 21:50:12+00:00): Oui car le numéro 10 est le haut de la rue et donc du lotissement des maison qui en son desservi 

Mais merci de votre remarque
roptat (2018-01-10 07:49:41+00:00): En réfléchissant bien, il vaut peut-être mieux créer un point adresse au début de la rue et faire de cette route un highway=service, service=driveway (si je me rapelle bien), access=<?> et ne pas mettre de nom.

Et au passage, ça m'étonnerait que les terrains de tennis à côté s'appellent vraiment tennis ;).
naoliv (2018-01-05 12:17:28+00:00): Reverts parts of the following changesets: 54936029 54943153 54943215 54944131 54944261 54944566 54964998 54965622 54966239 54989595 54992645 54995761 54995891 54996061 54996432 54996670 54998846 55007547 55007710 55008010 55010858 55011045 55064788 55065644 55068753 55068947 55069708 55070284 55070311 55070347 55070428 55070606 55071227 55071373 55077134 55077584 55077671 55077922 55078186 55078303 55078820 55079018 55079204 55079276 55079379 55079670 55080109 55080517 55081023 55081605 55081892 55084883 55085010 55085640 55087708 55088708 55090403 55112795 55112883 55113171 55114170 55115907 55117272 55129325 55131822 55132596 55132850 55135897 55139590 55155019 55155266 55157228 55157251 55157537
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-01-05 12:44:19+00:00): Estas vias não devem ser secundárias, vias secundárias não são vias menos importantes, e sim mais importante. Aqui um fluxograma: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:How_to_map_a
Hildson Ribeiro (2018-01-05 12:47:35+00:00): Ok. Então, identifico como? Estou apenas tentando acertar as marcações que estão incompletas no aplicativo que uso várias vias não aparecem.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-01-05 12:54:15+00:00): De serviço
Hildson Ribeiro (2018-01-05 12:55:37+00:00): Ok. Obrigado
naoliv (2018-01-05 12:23:02+00:00): Reverts parts of the following changesets: 54936029 54943153 54943215 54944131 54944261 54944566 54964998 54965622 54966239 54989595 54992645 54995761 54995891 54996061 54996432 54996670 54998846 55007547 55007710 55008010 55010858 55011045 55064788 55065644 55068753 55068947 55069708 55070284 55070311 55070347 55070428 55070606 55071227 55071373 55077134 55077584 55077671 55077922 55078186 55078303 55078820 55079018 55079204 55079276 55079379 55079670 55080109 55080517 55081023 55081605 55081892 55084883 55085010 55085640 55087708 55088708 55090403 55112795 55112883 55113171 55114170 55115907 55117272 55129325 55131822 55132596 55132850 55135897 55139590 55155019 55155266 55157228 55157251 55157537
Владимир К (2018-01-12 10:45:00+00:00): Приветствую!
Хочу заметить, что на этих двух дорожках лишние теги footway=sidewalk.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551048728
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551048730

этот тег надо ставить только тротуарах - это когда дорожка идет вдоль проезжей части.
eggie (2018-01-05 13:03:32+00:00): Oke Maarten. Even de simpele regel. 
Wanneer er het ronde blauwe bord staat is het een wandelpad. Staat dat er niet dan is het een path.
Op een path routeert een fiets altijd. Dat hoef je niet aan te geven. Mag hier ook een brommer komen... zoniet dan moped=no Dus welk bord staat er?
eggie (2018-01-05 13:09:51+00:00): Volgens mij is path goed, maar komt het wel uit op een onverplicht fietspad en geen achter de huizen. Dat zou je kunnen taggen als.
highway=cycleway
mofa=no
moped=no
traffic_sign=NL:G13
eggie (2018-01-05 13:10:31+00:00): Door dat park loopt dus een fietspad en geen pad.
naoliv (2018-01-05 12:29:00+00:00): Reverts parts of the following changesets: 54936029 54943153 54943215 54944131 54944261 54944566 54964998 54965622 54966239 54989595 54992645 54995761 54995891 54996061 54996432 54996670 54998846 55007547 55007710 55008010 55010858 55011045 55064788 55065644 55068753 55068947 55069708 55070284 55070311 55070347 55070428 55070606 55071227 55071373 55077134 55077584 55077671 55077922 55078186 55078303 55078820 55079018 55079204 55079276 55079379 55079670 55080109 55080517 55081023 55081605 55081892 55084883 55085010 55085640 55087708 55088708 55090403 55112795 55112883 55113171 55114170 55115907 55117272 55129325 55131822 55132596 55132850 55135897 55139590 55155019 55155266 55157228 55157251 55157537
naoliv (2018-01-05 12:37:45+00:00): Reverts parts of the following changesets: 54936029 54943153 54943215 54944131 54944261 54944566 54964998 54965622 54966239 54989595 54992645 54995761 54995891 54996061 54996432 54996670 54998846 55007547 55007710 55008010 55010858 55011045 55064788 55065644 55068753 55068947 55069708 55070284 55070311 55070347 55070428 55070606 55071227 55071373 55077134 55077584 55077671 55077922 55078186 55078303 55078820 55079018 55079204 55079276 55079379 55079670 55080109 55080517 55081023 55081605 55081892 55084883 55085010 55085640 55087708 55088708 55090403 55112795 55112883 55113171 55114170 55115907 55117272 55129325 55131822 55132596 55132850 55135897 55139590 55155019 55155266 55157228 55157251 55157537
viloan (2018-01-05 12:31:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Constable (2018-01-08 10:33:44+00:00): per favore quando salvi una modifica inserisci un commento sensato
grazie
sommerluk (2018-01-08 23:54:44+00:00): 👍 Merci !
naoliv (2018-01-05 12:43:55+00:00): Reverts parts of the following changesets: 54936029 54943153 54943215 54944131 54944261 54944566 54964998 54965622 54966239 54989595 54992645 54995761 54995891 54996061 54996432 54996670 54998846 55007547 55007710 55008010 55010858 55011045 55064788 55065644 55068753 55068947 55069708 55070284 55070311 55070347 55070428 55070606 55071227 55071373 55077134 55077584 55077671 55077922 55078186 55078303 55078820 55079018 55079204 55079276 55079379 55079670 55080109 55080517 55081023 55081605 55081892 55084883 55085010 55085640 55087708 55088708 55090403 55112795 55112883 55113171 55114170 55115907 55117272 55129325 55131822 55132596 55132850 55135897 55139590 55155019 55155266 55157228 55157251 55157537
stedewa (2018-01-08 22:31:19+00:00): Il serait judicieux de marquer l'emplacement des ifs et autres petits buissons dans le rond-point Av. du Mont-Blanc/R. Malagny ;-)

Au fait, les rond-points n'ont-ils pas un nom particulier?
RemiBovard (2018-01-09 07:12:16+00:00): "Feel free to do it" si on les voit sur l'imagerie satellite ;)

Pour le nom je ne sais pas, c'est du ressort des communes. Il faudrait voir sur place.