piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Pedja (2014-11-17 00:11:44+00:00): StefanB, by Serbian laws, Serbian language is primary, and others are allowed to be used as secondary where people of other nations live. 

Even where Serbian population is absolute, street names are marked using Cyrillic and Latin script. This is how all street names are organized.

Kosovo is imaginary country. It does not exist according to international laws. It is still part of Serbia and named Kosovo and Metohia. 

OSM as international foundation should follow international law and respect internationally recognized territory of Serbia.

Even, if OSM decides to go against international law and allow different naming on territory of Kosovo and Metohija, it should enforce naming proposed by laws issued by Kosovo and Metohija, which equals Serbian and Albanian language, meaning, each sign must be set using both languages.

What Albanians are doing in vandalism acts on OSM map of Kosovo and Metohija is that they enforce Albanian language, and expel Serbian language from the map. They even rename places that never had Albanian names with just sole purpose: to erase any evidence of Serbian population, physical and cultural existence on that territory, which is all even against their own laws.

This is something OSM should not allow.
DaCor (2014-11-13 04:11:20+00:00): Hi, 

I love that you are fixing a lot of naming issues, but could youplease do changesets that cover smaller areas and its not possible to identify if your change affects an area Im monitoring or not as it covers half the globe
SomeoneElse (2014-11-14 01:50:20+00:00): I notice that this (extremely wide) changeset has changed e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1419597467/history from "shop=antiquities" to "shop=antiques".  From an English language perspective, I'd expect that a "shop=antiquities" would sell very different things to a "shop=antiques".  Did you do anything (e.g. survey) to check that "shop=antiques" is in fact valid here?  It's certainly not a "spelling error" which your changeset comment suggests.
Math1985 (2014-11-14 02:31:54+00:00): Antiquité is the French word for antiques, so I think we can safely assume this is in fact a spelling error - admittedly a spelling error that created another valid English word.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-14 10:01:41+00:00): Did you ask the original creator of the changeset whether that is what they meant in this particular case?
Himké (2014-11-15 01:05:45+00:00): #1 meets definition of motorway for scope of edit. Any other reason?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-25 14:58:19+00:00): this bus=1 is some typo to be removed, right?

can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5361054 ?
richlv (2026-06-25 22:01:16+00:00): Oh my, 11 year old changeset :)
Removed that tag, might have been a case of doing "bu[tab]" on a way that already had building=yes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-26 07:11:19+00:00): thanks for a fix! And for being active for so long :)
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-14 09:19:21+00:00): Wypadałoby kalibrować podkład binga przed rysowaniem czegokolwiek.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-14 18:59:16+00:00): This looks very much like a mechanical edit of "tower_type" to "tower:type".  Was this discussed anywhere, so to anyone relying on "tower_type" in the data (e.g. for a local map) knows that they need to now expect "tower:type" instead?

Also, the changeset comment ("syntaxfehler") doesn't describe the actual change being made.
coppy (2014-11-16 18:03:55+00:00): Der Way 312545615 hat keine Eigenschaften. Gehört der auch mit zum ehemaligen Bahnhof Remscheid-Hasten? 
Außerdem sind die ehemaligen Gleise in diesem Bereich ja definitv nicht mehr sichtbar. Spricht was dagegen, die als railway=dismantled oder railway=razed zu taggen? (s. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Drazed)
ThomasHardy (2014-11-17 07:00:23+00:00): Ja, 312545615 gehört zum Bhf Hasten und hat jetzt Eigenschaften. Und noch drei weitere Gleise, die noch folgen. Dismantled ist richtiger als abandoned und hab ich eingepflegt. Hintergrund ist eine Kartierung der historischen Strecken.
tomasss (2014-11-13 08:24:30+00:00): pridanie chodnika na sisplaci
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-13 09:41:03+00:00): Proszę dodawać komentarze do zmian.
PerYskoP (2014-11-13 13:17:02+00:00): Ok, zapamiętam :)
Dodałem rondo
arcanma (2014-12-06 18:24:25+00:00): way 312551230 senza alcuna etichetta, etichetta nome su nodo, cosa si voleva mappare?
arcanma (2014-12-06 18:36:12+00:00): Inserita la way 312551992 senza alcun tag e cancellata la way 180714764, v8. ???
mavl (2014-11-14 04:42:03+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Этот шлагбаум http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3184252173 и проезд, на котором он стоит, находятся между домов или под домом?

Один дом нарисован двумя частями вплотную и неясно, что имелось в виду.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-14 17:37:49+00:00): I notice that this large changeset removes the "drinkable=yes" tag from e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/966339776/history .  Was this change discussed anywhere so that anyone previously rendering "drinkable=yes" on a map would no to update it before this change was made?
SomeoneElse (2014-11-14 17:39:20+00:00): Also, the changeset comment "water" really isn't very descriptive.  Much more helpful would have been something like "mechanical editing all amenity=drinking_water to remove any drinkable=yes tags".
escada (2016-09-22 03:56:56+00:00): Was there any reaction on your questions ? Why wasn't this changeset reverted ?
philippec (2017-04-03 10:07:05+00:00): Maybe place a note for Polyglot.  That is his territory.
SomeoneElse (2017-04-03 10:11:10+00:00): @FrViPofm - can you think of a good reason why this should _not_ be reverted?
FrViPofm (2017-04-03 20:07:17+00:00): @SomeoneElse - can you think of a good reason why this should be reverted?
SomeoneElse (2017-04-04 21:55:16+00:00): @FrViPofm Yes, it looks like a mechanical edit that removes tags added by other mappers.
philippec (2017-04-05 09:41:35+00:00): I think that SomeoneElse deserves a good explanation.
FrViPofm (2017-04-05 20:15:00+00:00): "looks like" but may not be...
----------
For one who read the doc (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drinking_water#Current_situation) they were 3384 drinkable=* at 2014-04-15. This changeset made 318 changes. Les that 10%. A mechanical edit on less than a tenth ?

A good reason ?
----------
1. It exists, and the wold is not as if it had never existed.

2. See the proposals and talk pages.

* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drinkable
* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/drinking_water

discussed nowhere ?
----------
Rudolf (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Rudolf) leaded the discussion on the 2 proposals. They were votes and so on... 6 month before this changeset

rendering "drinkable=yes" ?
----------
I've never heard anybody but me, (project for the website "Randonner léger") using those tags.

Who today is hurted two and half years later than on a tenth of occurrences of a value, for a tag that was said deprecated by its promoter himself three years ago

not very descriptive ?
----------
I'm not talkative. It' said, among monks, that we have two eyes, two hears and hopefully one mouth, so we must see and hear rather than talk.

SomeoneElse deserves a good explanation
----------
Not me ?
I must say that I don't understand the aim of the discussion. Is the map less consistent ? Is someone hurt ? I've still heard no good reason.
SomeoneElse (2017-04-05 20:33:31+00:00): I'm sorry but you still haven't explained exactly _what_ you have changed or _why_ you changed it.  For example, why did you change http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/942584694/history but not, say, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1261454510 ?  Assuming that you haven't visited all of these places to survey them yourself or have other knowledge of them where did you discuss your proposed mechanical edit?
The answer to " Is someone hurt ?" is "we don't know" simply because we don't know everything that people use OSM data for.  There have been mechanical edits which seemed (even to me) at the time to make sense but actually did not simply because I didn't understand how the tags were being used everywhere - that's why the mechanical edit policy has a requirement to discuss, so that problems can be found out before the change is made.  Also, it gives anyone who is using the data of an "invalid tag" the chance to change.
Best Regards,
Andy
FrViPofm (2017-04-05 21:33:31+00:00): I don't remember, it's more than 2 years ago... But I'm pretty sure I had enough knowledge on those nodes, with the tags themselves, according to the wiki. e.g. amenity=drinking_water implies drinking_water=yes. As junction=roundabout implies oneway=yes.
According to Rudolph mentions, they have been discussions on the German forum, on the tagging list, on the wiki about those tags. Difficult to be more verbose.
About this changeset, no discussion, as far as I remember. Because it is not mechanical. Yes I used to make big changeset, uploading at one a long time of work. In my profile, I have not too much changesets on my counter, however I was during a time in the top 10 contributors without a mechanical edit !
2½ years ! The guy has had the chance to change ! He has read the wiki and makes now a good use of good tags : now drinking_water=* > 41 000.
But they are still 1700 data (drinkable=*) unavailable for those having projects and reading the doc. A pity ! A mess !

OK, enough talked. I'm tired.
Ciao.
Poingg (2014-11-13 09:54:52+00:00): Added my company's new location
lezurdis (2014-11-13 21:46:32+00:00): Gosto de ver changeset com comentário !
Como estás inscrito a pouco tempo, parece-me que foi a  primeira vez que usaste um comentário, é assim mesmo !
E espero que é para continuar :-)

Como podes ver, podemos deixar mensagens num changeset, e poder ler um comentário é uma grande ajuda para a pessoa que quer deixar um recado.

Eu vou deixar-te um recado no que toque aos correios, adicionaste este nó :

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3184294474

O que não era preciso, os correios já lá estão de já há muito tempo, más estão no prédio :

- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128733708

E neste caso preferemos uma área que descreve melhor a realidade do que um ponto simples.
Feliz Pereira (2018-09-13 12:26:53+00:00): introdução de nomes nas que não existiam e sentidos, superfícies e faixas
KristenK (2015-11-07 00:27:13+00:00): Hello. I noticed in your edits that you updated the ISO 3166-2 code for the Lékoumou (Relation ID: 3220592) to CG-7.  In reality the ISO 3166-2  code for Lékoumou is supposed to be CG-2. 

See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-2:CG

Anyway. I'll go ahead and update the ISO 3166-2 code for the Lékoumou district. 
 
Just wanted to let you know.

Best,

Kristen
arcanma (2014-12-06 18:31:00+00:00): Way service sovrapposta a way preesistente, dovrebbe essere lasciata la versione che rispecchia meglio la situazione reale, anche il valore del tag service è discutibile.
Hjart (2014-11-14 08:50:59+00:00): Du lagde et stykke af stien dobbelt, hvilket fik den til at lyse op i routing-laget på http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
maraf24 (2015-09-17 07:40:18+00:00): Uwaga http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/436149
flohoff (2014-11-13 16:43:34+00:00): Hi,
leider ist hier kein changeset kommentar drin. Ich vermute du hast den track "Am Röhrbach" verlängert?
Zwölf (2014-11-13 12:03:45+00:00): Why don't the mappings I have saved show on map (Änderugnssatz 26735931)?
EugenyN (2016-04-18 10:08:42+00:00): Точно ли голубой факел существует ? Сейчас там большая территория - база отдыха - окружённая забором, наблюдательными вышками и колючей проволокой с названием  "Тайга".
suslikk (2016-04-18 11:03:58+00:00): не совсем понимаю о чем речь...
EugenyN (2016-04-18 11:08:50+00:00): год назад ты отметил базу отдыха "Голубой факел" http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3184362160 .  я вчера проходил там мимо и теперь там огромный парк отель "тайга" http://taiga-hotel.com/ . я также нарисовал его вчера.   вопрос в том существует ли "Голубой факел"   сейчас ? возможно "Тайга" выкупила их территорию.  никакой информации по голубому факелу в интернете найти нельзя.
EugenyN (2016-04-18 11:10:06+00:00): в викимапии про территорию тайги говорится "Комплекс маленьких полузаброшенных турбаз. Некоторые отстраиваются заново. Одна из турбаз "Голубой факел"."    - это очевидно устаревшая информация. и соотв. голубого факела давно нет.
EugenyN (2016-04-18 11:11:25+00:00): тогда точку с голубым факелом нужно удалить.
suslikk (2016-04-18 11:11:49+00:00): вспомнил, сейчас не знаю, что с ним, еще год назад вывеска была и народ там был... Сейчас поеду ближе к лету туда и проверю , что реально стало.
EugenyN (2016-04-18 11:12:33+00:00): ок
EugenyN (2016-04-18 11:14:23+00:00): сейчас там трёхметровый забор с камерами и колючей проволкой. именно в том месте. - территория "тайги".
sabas88 (2014-11-13 13:46:02+00:00): Does that way across the heath area actually exist? And there's a second pedestrian access? I remember only one...
Thanks.
misht (2014-11-13 14:02:08+00:00): The road to the parking lot is, and pedestrian roads probably not, wrong) Fixed it.
Thank you.
chillly (2014-11-15 21:17:38+00:00): This is node is not needed, the area of the gardens already has the name on it
Hjart (2014-11-15 06:59:47+00:00): Vær venligst opmærksom på at tagge/klassificere ting korrekt, i stedet for blot som i dette tilfælde at navngive dem "Sti". Jeg har iøvrigt tilladt mig at rette stort set alt hvad du har lavet. Tak
prokyon (2015-03-30 05:55:49+00:00): Did you remove the building tag on purpose?
BushmanK (2014-11-14 21:06:26+00:00): Куда делся тег building=yes?
Почему описание попало в note а не в description (тег note предназначен для технических заметок, а для описаний - description)?
Почему "туристическая достопримечательность" а не "памятник архитектуры", то есть historic=manor и heritage=2?
deleted_account (2015-03-16 16:16:49+00:00): Cześć, czy to 113 m w tym miejscu jest  pewne? Według mapy Geoportalu Topo, ten punkt 113 m jest trochę na południe, a w tym miejscu w którym umieściłeś ten punkt jest 107,7.
BushmanK (2014-11-14 22:53:38+00:00): На каком основании снят military? Это перестало быть в/ч и стало ГУП или ОАО? Ссылка на документ об изменении статуса есть?
chillly (2014-11-13 15:13:15+00:00): You have told me by email that you have deliberately edited this shop name to test my reaction to an unsurveyed edit.

My reaction is that you are deliberately trying to provoke a conflict and I will not stand for that.
Math1985 (2014-11-13 15:51:59+00:00): The changeset we are discussing is, in my opinion, clearly an improvement to the map. But the intent of this changeset is not only to improve the map, but also to improve the way we map.

We have clearly different views on what is the best way for OpenStreetMap to function. I believe that your strong opposition to mechanical edits and standardization is harmful for the project. As far as I understand, you in turn believe that my mechanical edits are harmful for the project. Given the comments on the talk-gb mailing lists, both our positions have support within the community.

I don't think it is necessarily bad to have a conflict, as you call it, about an edit, especially when the conflict is about a very minor change (a single apostrophe) that is representative for our difference of opinion on a wider scale. Having the conflict reduced to a concrete and small case makes it in my opinion easier to discuss, and also makes potential involvement of the DWG (in case you were to decide to involve them) easier.

Please don't confuse that with a personal conflict - I appreciate the constructive discussion we have had, and I very much appreciate the work you're doing for OSM.
Nmxosm (2018-09-06 09:54:57+00:00): Die Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312603208 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132963944 haben die selbe Adresse. Das sollte überprüft werden. Siehe auch http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/yWn
vgf (2018-09-07 15:28:01+00:00): Das kleinere Gebäude ist die auf dem gleichen Grundstück befindliche Doppelgarage (Adressen sind ja grundstücksbezogen). Ich werde mal sehen, wie sich das anders lösen lässt.
Parzelle13 (2018-09-07 16:33:33+00:00): Trotzdem bekommt nur das Hauptgebäude (Wohn- oder Geschäftshaus) die Adresse. Da der Garageneigentümer/Mieter die Lage seiner Garage kennt, ist diese Information zur Navigation unnötig. Dafür könnte man aber in diesem Fall dort building=garages setzen. Bei Nummer 15 gilt übrigens das Gleiche.
vgf (2018-09-08 14:17:43+00:00): Die Zuordnung von mehreren (häufig auch Wohn-)Gebäuden zu einem Grundstück/einer Adresse ist wichtig. Sie einfach wegzulassen, wäre ein Informationsverlust.
highflyer74 (2018-09-08 18:18:11+00:00): @vgf: da muss ich Parzelle13 und Nmxosm zustimmen. Die Lage ist in OSM recht eindeutig so, dass wir Nebengebäude nicht noch einmal mit der Adresse versehen. Es geht bei Adressen darum, diese navigierbar zu machen und nicht, um zu zeigen, welcher Schuppen oder welche Garage zu einem bestimmten Grundstück gehört. Viele Grüße!
iWowik (2014-11-26 14:21:51+00:00): Зачем кавычки-то ломать?
Endres Pelka (2017-05-05 08:38:45+00:00): Is there really a hotel (node 3184806338) in the Eye of Sahara? On MapBox satellite images there's nothing at that spot. Also, would you be so kind and write descriptive changeset comments? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
DemoLogin (2014-11-13 16:34:51+00:00): Почта не работает по праздникам
emacsen (2014-11-13 19:52:29+00:00): What is the source of these locations?
AppAmapper (2014-11-13 19:54:53+00:00): All have physical presence and are also aggregated here - http://easybitllc.com/locations/
emacsen (2014-11-13 19:58:25+00:00): How did you get the geocoordinstes from the locations?
emacsen (2014-11-13 19:58:52+00:00): erm I mean the geo-coordinates, ie how did you geocode the addresses?
AppAmapper (2014-11-13 20:00:48+00:00): The geo-coordinates were all provided by our partners. The location at Warie's Thai Restaurant (Rozengracht 235) I personally helped set up.
emacsen (2014-11-13 20:23:43+00:00): What partners? Are you telling me that there are people with GPSes at each location?
AppAmapper (2014-11-13 20:25:29+00:00): No, they have addresses at which the ATMs are deployed. I assume those addresses are associated with GPS coordinates, but I don't have the GPS coordinates, only the addresses.
emacsen (2014-11-13 20:26:18+00:00): I'm asking how you got the lat/longs from the addresses. It's clear that you didn't go out with a GPS to locations...
AppAmapper (2014-11-13 20:28:39+00:00): No, I don't have GPS and I didn't visit most of those locations physically. I looked the addresses up on OSM and then correlated them with Google Maps. Once I was sure that they were the same I made appropriate changes and/or added new ATMs.
emacsen (2014-11-13 20:31:20+00:00): You (and the other Bitcoin mappers) need to understand that this is not alright from a variety of standpoints. I'm going to go ahead and revert your changesets- just as myself, not involving the Data Working Group, but you folks (the entire Bitcoin community) need to find a way to work with OSM in a way that meets our mapping requirements.
AppAmapper (2014-11-13 20:37:19+00:00): What requirements specifically do you mean?
What is required from me to make the appropriate additions and changes?

I've looked at the Beginner's Manual and at first glance couldn't find the requirements you're referring to.
AppAmapper (2014-11-13 23:06:52+00:00): If there are specific requirements for us Bitcoiners to adhere to then please let us know. I think I speak for all of the community when I say that none of us want to add bogus data to this service nor are trying to be malicious in any way, shape or form.

So if I could somehow see what requirements we have to adhere to, I'll let the community know and hopefully we can all contribute the best way possible.
emacsen (2014-11-13 23:18:22+00:00): Any time you're copying data from one source to another, it's an import and needs go to through the Import Guidelines: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
MarcoR (2014-11-14 14:26:35+00:00): Non l'ho mai sentita col nome di "Stazione Leopolda" però sulla pagina di Wikipedia  italiana è scritto che è conosciuta anche in quel modo; tra l'altro sarebbe coerente con le corrispondenti (ex) stazioni "Leopolde" di Pisa ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89527551 ) e Firenze ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269666091 ); propongo di inserirlo almeno in alt_name; che te ne pare?
Claudio Dario (2014-11-14 15:05:42+00:00): Per me va bene, ho cambiato il nome con quello più conosciuto per correttezza (e basandomi proprio sulla voce di it.wiki). Faccio subito.
Nakaner (2014-11-28 18:55:33+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27096621. Siehe auch http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=28216
Nakaner (2014-11-28 18:55:21+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27096621. Siehe auch http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=28216
naoliv (2014-11-13 17:50:27+00:00): Wagner, vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula sobre mapeamento e cartografia? Quem está ensinando vocês?
naoliv (2014-11-13 17:50:44+00:00): Leandro, vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula sobre mapeamento e cartografia? Quem está ensinando vocês?
naoliv (2014-11-13 17:50:57+00:00): João, vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula sobre mapeamento e cartografia? Quem está ensinando vocês?
Nakaner (2014-11-28 18:52:48+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27096621. Siehe auch http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=28216
naoliv (2014-11-13 17:51:17+00:00): Mariane, vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula sobre mapeamento e cartografia? Quem está ensinando vocês?
chillly (2014-11-14 18:22:13+00:00): This looks like it needs some revision. Names on bridges and tunnels have overridden rail line names, length (and Length) tags are probably superfluous. Some of the names are duplicates - is that likely?
SomeoneElse (2014-12-06 00:20:47+00:00): I noticed the implausible and mis-spelt name ("Aqueuct") on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154164027 , but then noticed the changeset discussion comment above.  Would this perhaps be better reverted and the none-duplicate names reapplied where appropriate?
naoliv (2014-11-13 17:51:34+00:00): Daniele, vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula sobre mapeamento e cartografia? Quem está ensinando vocês?
naoliv (2014-11-13 18:01:41+00:00): Geilson, vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula sobre mapeamento e cartografia? Quem está ensinando vocês?
neiljp (2014-11-14 00:31:48+00:00): Thanks for your contributions! Please consider using a descriptive comment when saving information to the map, as it helps you and other mappers understand what you have done and why, when looking back at the changes.
Richard_Taylor (2014-11-15 11:06:43+00:00): Thanks, I will from now on! Changed BrewDog from industry to brewery, and added the Decorating business on the corner. I'll leave comments as I work from now on, though
neiljp (2014-11-18 12:15:58+00:00): That's good to hear :)
Another pointer, just looking at what's here: you shouldn't need a node *and* an area for an object (ie. the brewery); normally if the latter is present, then it is the more-detailed form and information can be transferred onto it.
naoliv (2014-11-13 18:32:57+00:00): JK, vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula sobre mapeamento e cartografia? Quem está ensinando vocês?
szali (2015-01-27 20:04:29+00:00): Szia! Picit arrébb rajzoltad az utat, mint ami a nyilvános trackekből és a műholdképből (Mapbox) kirajzolódik. JOSM-ben ha beikszeled a "Raw GPS data" boxot a letöltésnél, akkor látni fogod a felhasználók által feltöltött GPS-trackeket is, és több track alapján, pontosabban tudsz rajzolni.
szali (2015-01-27 20:05:47+00:00): Ja, és töltsd fel a saját nyomvonalaidat is (osm.org honlapra), ugyanebből az okból! Köszi előre is!
Carcarlo (2014-11-13 18:59:23+00:00): Corretto il punto finale di Via Empolese e l'inizio di Via Giuseppe di Vittorio.
Hjart (2014-11-14 21:34:05+00:00): Jeg har før undret mig over de ekstra noder du har tilføjet på diverse snorlige vejstykker. Hvad er formålet med dem?