piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
demon_box (2017-03-05 17:46:40+00:00): ciao, benvenuto!
ti segnalo che questi 2 tags sono errati:
name=Lumezzane
ele=10 (ele si intende l'altezza sul livello del mare...)
grazie.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-02 12:13:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-01-12 17:02:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Grillo (2017-06-27 16:52:26+00:00): Is there really a cinema at the end of a road called "Bom"?
Norrlandsson (2017-06-28 06:57:56+00:00): Hello Grillo,

There is no cinema, only a barrier for cars. Unfortunately OSM does not have a sign (or maybe I did not notice it) for that. Can you reverse the change and assign a proper sign to it?
Grillo (2017-07-01 09:47:18+00:00): barrier=gate is the proper tag. Please don't use other tags which you know are wrong when you can't find a proper one. In that case it's better to create a note.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:33:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:03:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mueschel (2017-01-02 12:57:07+00:00): Why did you delete this hotel? Please use changeset comments!
mavl (2017-01-12 17:02:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:14:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:02:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
alphensebezorger (2017-01-12 19:06:20+00:00): Hallo Kogacarlo,
afgezien van de discussie over hoeveel parkeerplaatsen hier voor de vrachtwagens zijn op het forum (IMHO maar één) viel me nog iets op.
De parking_aisles zijn getagged als eenrichtingsverkeer. OSM Inspector gaat natuurlijk klagen over die in het midden omdat je daar niet zou kunnen komen (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6701634). Maar dat zou ik lekker negeren, dan leren ze daar bij OSMI maar dat je ook over parkeervlakken kan rijden.
Maar de zuidelijkste (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6701611), daar zullen de vrachtwagens toch echt wel naar het westen weg mogen rijden lijkt me. Is het niet logischer om tenminste die als tweerichtingsverkeer te taggen?
P.S. Ik weet niet of er ergens borden staan voor het eenrichtingsverkeer, maar de pijlen op de weg lijken mij niet juridisch 'geldig'. Die zou ik eerder als advies/suggestie opvatten. Alle oneway=yes eraf is dan ook optie naar mijn idee.
Grtz.
Kogacarlo (2017-01-26 15:21:13+00:00): Je hebt uiteraard gelijk. Had je zelf ook mogen doen hoor ;) Ik heb de zuidelijke oneway weggehaald.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:33:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
SomeoneElse (2023-06-24 12:14:20+00:00): Hello,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 6 years ago. On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4585200897 here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
FTA (2017-01-29 16:03:21+00:00): Hi Hepuricika,
I hope you have been enjoying OpenStreetMap so far. I am wondering about some of the objects you have added in this changeset. Are these real? What is their significance? While it's great you have added some local names and knowledge to this area, I would hate for that good and quality data to be polluted by possibly fake data. Lots of businesses, governments, and people depend on our map data.
Happy Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
luiswoo (2017-01-02 16:34:58+00:00): *Рождественская улица 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
FTA (2017-02-22 00:58:02+00:00): Hi Hepuricika,

I wanted to follow up from my comment a few weeks ago. Can you provide some more information about your edits in this area? Is there really a monument named Destroyed Pine Tree? And a house named Circular House? To an outsider, these look like they were possibly added falsely for one reason or another, but I am not familiar with the area. Please let us know.

Thank you,
Ethan aka FTA with the Data Working Group

traducere automată

Bună Hepuricika,

Am vrut să urmeze din comentariul meu acum câteva săptămâni. Pot să vă ofere unele mai multe informații despre modificările dvs. în acest domeniu? Există într-adevăr un monument numit Destroyed Pine Tree? Și o casă numită circular Casa? Pentru un străin, acestea arata ca acestea au fost, eventual, a adăugat în mod fals dintr-un motiv sau altul, dar eu nu sunt familiarizați cu zona. Vă rugăm să ne anunțați.

Mulțumesc,
Ethan aka FTA cu Grupul de lucru al datelor
SomeoneElse (2017-01-02 12:36:47+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3748897325 number 46 or is that next door, as previously mapped?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2017-01-02 13:05:03+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement cette agence est localisée au 46, mais étend ses bureaux jusqu'au 46 bis, 
Je l'ai repositionné sur le 46.
Merci de vos remarques
Cordialement
Alain
SomeoneElse (2017-01-02 21:05:58+00:00): Merci!
cquest (2017-01-08 18:18:35+00:00): J'ai aussi supprimé les addr:* car cela fait un doublon. Utilisez contact:* à la place. Merci
Johnny Carlsen (2017-01-15 02:54:46+00:00): Hi Balthus, I can see that you have started to change residential roads to tracks. These roads are clearly residential, and probably unpaved residential roads. Tracks are mostly used for agricultural purposes.
136154 (2017-01-20 09:12:38+00:00): Thank you for your comment Johnny. I am completely aware of the difference. It was just the quickest method to make them UNpaved –  Sorry to bother you :)
Johnny Carlsen (2017-01-20 11:40:13+00:00): Changing from highway=residential to highway=track should not be much easier than just adding surface=unpaved.

Also tracks are not necessarily unpaved. So your change didn't really improve the data either, it just kind of made it worse.

Anyway, you are not bothering me at all. I just find it better to address problems as quickly as possible, so we don't end up with thousands of similar errors in the map data because nobody reported the problem.
Chieftl (2017-03-29 07:11:32+00:00): Добрий день
Ви вказали для цього магазину сайт http://nyzova4kids.if.ua, але це сайт іншого магазину, на вул. Низовій.
Цей магазин на вул. Героїв Крут точно належить до тієї ж компанії?
mavl (2017-10-16 17:00:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52985622 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44756718].
SomeoneElse (2017-01-03 14:51:47+00:00): Oops - I think that your phone doesn't have a location.  You've added this bike park in the middle of the Atlantic!
mavl (2017-10-16 17:00:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52985622 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44756718].
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-02 19:21:58+00:00): Hi xiaowajiang_197, welcome to OSM. This is your first changeset, why did you delete so many mapped highways? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44843863
mavl (2017-10-16 17:00:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52985622 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44756718].
BCNorwich (2017-01-02 19:07:31+00:00): Hello there, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Untagged way 463240250 that just goes out into a field, was that inadvertent, can it be removed?
Sam Liam Perkins (2017-01-03 16:58:21+00:00): If you mean Pen Hill Lane, that was meant to be there.
If you mean something else that I missed, feel free.
Sam Liam Perkins (2017-01-03 17:00:28+00:00): Oh, I see what you meant now. Stupid spindly bit I left poking off of Mill Lane. Yes, that was an accident, you can remove that.
BCNorwich (2017-01-03 17:08:04+00:00): OK, removed.
Adam_Piszczek (2017-01-30 14:46:43+00:00): Pytanie po co ten sam adres podwójnie
Adam_Piszczek (2017-01-31 15:14:08+00:00): adres już tam jest a podałeś ponownie
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
rurseekatze (2018-11-10 15:51:13+00:00): Hallo nawmap,

ich habe zufällig entdeckt, dass du hier die Absturzstellen von Flugzeugen eingetragen hast.

Falls vor Ort ein Gedenkstein für das Unglück stehen sollte, kannst du den natürlich mappen. Die Absturzstellen selbst dagegen gehören nicht in OSM. Sie sind nicht vor Ort erkennbar und damit keine real existierenden Objekte. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Mappe_keine_historische_Ereignisse_und_ehemalige_Objekte.
Wenn du die Absturzstellen kartieren möchtest, kannst du das zum Beispiel mit https://www.geojson.io/ tun und die Daten als GeoJSON oder KML abspeichern (und bei Bedarf veröffentlichen).

In OSM gehören die Punkte jedenfalls nicht, daher werde ich sie in den kommenden Tagen entfernen.

Gruß
Alex
Parzelle13 (2018-11-10 17:08:22+00:00): Das sehe ich auch so, sonst mappen wir demnächst noch Unfallstellen mit Todesfolge oder Tatorte bei Mordopfern.
Gedenk- und Stolpersteine sind natürlich was anderes.

Gruß
rurseekatze (2018-11-19 19:15:16+00:00): Ich habe die Objekte nun entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64669911
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-16 15:03:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-16 15:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Commodoortje (2017-01-02 15:13:03+00:00): GelreJoe,
Kun je wat uitleg geven bij deze mutaties?
Een Monument is namelijk in OSM iets heel anders.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
Commodoortje (2017-01-02 22:18:13+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik contact met u gehad. 
De monumenten blijken stolpersteine te zijn. On overleg zal ik het aanpassen aan het taggingsschema die hiervoor is.
LordOfMaps (2017-01-02 15:11:01+00:00): Hi,
hast offenbar aus Versehen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41376839 komplett verschoben.
Machst Du das wieder rückgängig?
marl (2017-01-02 19:29:45+00:00): Tatsächlich. Sorry. Ist jetzt korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis.
LordOfMaps (2017-01-02 19:34:53+00:00): Super.
mavl (2017-10-16 15:04:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
Commodoortje (2017-01-02 15:13:54+00:00): GelreJoe, 
Kun je wat uitleg geven bij deze mutaties? 
Een Monument is namelijk in OSM iets heel anders. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
Commodoortje (2017-01-04 06:48:21+00:00): Inmiddels historic=monument aangepast naar taggingsschema stolpersteine.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Stolpersteine
Upendrakarukonda (2017-01-19 04:26:58+00:00): Hello  Евгений Мавлик,
 
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I know the source you used to add manmade wells. It seems you also added some on roads. Can I have clarification on that?

Regards,

Upendra.
Евгений Мавлик (2017-01-20 08:01:45+00:00): Hello, I work in fire protection in the Korkino municipal district responsible for fire water labels is a real place of fire hydrants cator I twice a year, check on health status these labels will help firefighters quickly find on the map a serviceable hydrant refuel with water to extinguish the fire to save the property and lives of citizens
mavl (2017-10-16 15:03:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
PT-53 (2017-01-02 18:06:10+00:00): Hallo MrWebber,
es wäre schön, wenn Du bei Deinen Änderungen jewils einen entsprechenden, aussagekräftigen Kommentar /was wurde wo gemacht) und die Quelle Deiner Daten angeben würdest.
Noch ein gutes neues Jahr.
MrWebber (2017-01-02 18:29:14+00:00): Hi Sorry, hatte ich vergessen. Dir auch ein gutes neues Jahr.
MrWebber (2017-01-02 18:31:27+00:00): Die alten Wege wurden abgetrennt und über eck verbunden. Den radwegverlauf habe ich dem neuen wegverlauf angepasst
PT-53 (2017-01-03 12:49:42+00:00): Hallo MrWebber,
zu Deiner Info:
Du hast die neuen Feldwege in die Sammel-Rad-Relation 80.049 eingefügt anstatt in die Rad-Relation 105.376. Ich habe dies korrigiert.
Grüße
MrWebber (2017-01-03 15:32:43+00:00): Ok, danke.
mavl (2017-10-16 15:03:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
Supaplex (2017-01-06 16:59:14+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Commodoortje (2017-01-02 15:14:06+00:00): GelreJoe, 
Kun je wat uitleg geven bij deze mutaties? 
Een Monument is namelijk in OSM iets heel anders. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
Commodoortje (2017-01-04 06:48:46+00:00): Inmiddels historic=monument aangepast naar taggingsschema stolpersteine.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Stolpersteine
CENTRALHUB (2018-12-28 06:20:22+00:00): It seems this station was messed up by a later change (Changeset 45066148).
trigpoint (2017-01-02 14:09:57+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit however something has gone a little wrong here, you seem to have created 2 untagged ways on top of existing ways.
What were you trying to achieve, maybe we can help.
Cheers Phil
chillly (2017-01-02 14:10:52+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM.

You seem to be struggling. You have added two things over te top of existing roads, but they are not tagged in any way to say what you intend them to be. Did you mean to save this? Would you like some help to tidy this up? 

We would like you to add or improve stuff in the area you know. Reply if you need any help.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-11 12:12:32+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2493859 ?
Commodoortje (2017-01-02 15:14:19+00:00): GelreJoe, 
Kun je wat uitleg geven bij deze mutaties? 
Een Monument is namelijk in OSM iets heel anders. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
Commodoortje (2017-01-04 06:48:59+00:00): Inmiddels historic=monument aangepast naar taggingsschema stolpersteine.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Stolpersteine
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Bonix-Mapper (2017-01-03 04:44:47+00:00): Olá,

Porque você apagou algumas vias nesta área.

O seu comentário não dá detalhes.

Obrigado.
BCNorwich (2017-01-03 08:08:26+00:00): There are still many problems with your mapping. Now I see gates mapped as linear features. A gate is an impediment/barrier to a way, not a way it's self. The tag barrier=gate should be placed on a single node of either a barrier or highway, or an intersection of a barrier and a highway, please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate
BCNorwich (2017-01-17 12:16:02+00:00): Problems now rectified
mavl (2017-01-12 17:05:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
*Martin* (2017-01-02 18:30:40+00:00): hi. please keep adding comments to all of your changesets. thanks.
Thunder08 (2017-01-02 18:42:52+00:00): Ok
mavl (2017-10-16 15:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52982949 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44844620].
os-emmer (2024-02-28 18:49:21+00:00): Hi ploppy,
you moved this SES-station to the middle of a road. Was that intended?
os-emmer (2024-02-28 18:50:36+00:00): I placed a node to make this more visible:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4131778
os-emmer (2024-02-28 18:50:54+00:00): I meant "note" not "node"
ploppy (2024-02-29 03:36:24+00:00): Yes, it’s under the road
os-emmer (2024-03-01 15:48:38+00:00): Thanks for the response. That makes sense. To prevent confusion at a later point I added a note=*:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4112641175
b0ssi (2024-03-22 01:04:47+00:00): To clarify, this sign is actually located *underneath* the elevated Syd Einfeld Drive on the ground level, to the side of Grosvenor street. The unresolved note 4131778 made this appear like a mapping issue.
Commodoortje (2017-01-02 15:14:31+00:00): GelreJoe, 
Kun je wat uitleg geven bij deze mutaties? 
Een Monument is namelijk in OSM iets heel anders. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
Commodoortje (2017-01-04 06:49:08+00:00): Inmiddels historic=monument aangepast naar taggingsschema stolpersteine.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Stolpersteine
Robin007 (2017-01-05 19:09:38+00:00): Czy ten fragment Malinowej faktycznie będzie nieprzejezdny? Z tego opisu nie wynika to jednoznacznie:  http://www.wroclaw.pl/remont-ul-oltaszynskiej-objazdy
Olga | Yanosik (2017-01-06 07:29:16+00:00): Witam, w artykule napisane jest, że zamknięcie Ołtaszyńskiej wraz ze skrzyżowaniem z Malinową. Ale zweryfikuję to wg śladów przejazdów 7 stycznia.
Pozdrawiam