piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kevo (2021-08-26 12:10:48+00:00): Thanks for fixing it and for the additional info! :)
pitscheplatsch (2021-08-28 05:13:11+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110366052

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Frans S (2021-08-25 14:14:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Not a single building has been squared. Please map more accurate.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110199742
Frans S (2021-08-25 14:15:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
More accurate mapping and square your buildings

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110199778
Frans S (2021-08-25 14:16:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate mapping and square the buildings you map

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110199779
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-25 21:32:30+00:00): Hi jessicam03586*@!

Welcome to OSM.

Pioneer Park is already on the map here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43223844
Are you able to remove the duplicate that was added in this changeset?

You've also added a house. While the house is fine to add, you shouldn't add details such as who lives in a house - would you like to attempt to fix this?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
lasagna (2021-10-09 23:14:08+00:00): Hello,
I'm curious about why you changed Science Center Drive from highway=unclassified to highway=residential. I changed it to highway=unclassified earlier. If my change was a mistake, I'd like to understand why so I can stop making that mistake.

Thanks
Frans S (2021-08-26 10:19:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate mapping. Squaring rectangular building. Do not connect mappings to other features.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110200206
Frans S (2021-08-26 11:59:48+00:00): Hello
Rather inaccurate mapped. Reverted changeset
Best regards
Frans S (2021-08-26 10:11:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Map more accurate , do not combine multiple buildings into 1 mapping, Square each building with the @ key.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110200306
Frans S (2021-08-27 09:15:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Yes, it are 2 buildings. See my previous comments  about mapping
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110200390
Frans S (2021-08-26 10:24:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Accurate mapping. Square mapped rectangular buildings.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110200428
MxxCon (2021-08-25 04:43:13+00:00): Hello.
When adding sidewalks as separate paths, please don't forget to tag adjacent streets with "sidewalk=separate" as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110200720
gscholz (2021-08-26 04:29:20+00:00): Hi erickdeoliveiraleal,
this changeset has created an error in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-68.02461&lat=-16.51804&zoom=13&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110200860

The river "Río Uma Palca" is affected here. Can you please fix this?
Guido
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-20 05:57:19+00:00): 刚要去给DWG写信
发现已经被revert了
φ(゜▽゜*)♪
ftcat (2021-08-25 05:33:24+00:00): Please don't classify ways as residential just because there hare a few houses in the vicinity. A residential road is one lined by houses in a residential area of a town or village, this applies to Africa just as it does in the developed world. The houses here are small family farms
Coolbaugh (2021-08-25 22:19:48+00:00): Hi ftcat. Another mapper added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961958552 as a tertiary, and I changed from tertiary to residential because it has houses along it. I’ve been told by other mappers that according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa, if there are any houses along a road, it cannot be track. However, I agree that this road can be track and will try to keep your preference for track in mind. Thank you.
ftcat (2021-08-26 05:19:50+00:00): Hi Coolbaugh,

I suppose it is a matter of semantics, are the houses along the road or in the vicinity of the road? Also the understanding of what a 'residential' road is, according to the OpenStreetMap tagging wiki it is within a settlement, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential, these roads are not within any settlements, they run through areas made up of small farms, the collections of buildings will be the dwelling places of the farmers, most of whom do not own any vehicles. As always 'guidelines' are exactly that a guide and need to be applied with some context. As the majority of mappers are remote mappers the guides are created with these mappers in mind. I would defy some of those who created the guides to classify some of the roads on the ground let alone from satellite imagery.

Another point, don't think of Africa as a single country, this really annoys the residents of the continent of Africa. Like the USA where there are many differences between the individual states in Africa there are differences between the countries. Unlike the states in the USA some countries drive on the left and others on the right.
Coolbaugh (2021-08-27 05:50:19+00:00): Thank you for the clarifying response! I took another look at the Zambia wiki page and saw the East Africa tagging guidelines that fit Zambia highway tagging better. I understand the points you’re making about generalising tagging across Africa and respect the local guidance you’ve given me here, thank you.
3ngineer (2021-09-07 04:33:34+00:00): Thanks for adding the name to this. What is your source for this?
julcnx (2021-08-26 11:36:58+00:00): Hello Hein, a tip about names in general. "name" should be for the official local name, "name:en" for the English translation, "name:th" for the Thai name (often duplicated) If the official restaurant name is in Thai and you only know it in English, then only use "name:en". Cheers, Julien. See this example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4592605527/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110203191
CENTRALHUB (2021-08-26 06:56:16+00:00): Before the discussion is settled, please don't make such bulk change because the deception in that "source" page is NOT standard. And such change has caused lots of mistakes. Using Chinese as the primary name is still a preferred way for tagging. Thanks.
hebolz (2021-09-12 17:54:03+00:00): Hello Belletower, 
you did the last edits on way 400881793 and refined its position. This highway is actually an abandoned railway. The tagging was changed to highway by another user 2 month ago. (In reality, it IS probably used as a highway, but that is another question). The change  is definitely not your responsibility, but maybe you have an idea or a tool to restore the original mapping without loosing to much newer data. Any help is most welcome. 
Greetings from germany 
Henning  (hebolz)
Belletower (2021-09-14 14:39:32+00:00): Hi hebolz. I think it’s best if the highway shares tags with the abandoned railway so that there’s no future confusion and since they share the same geometry. I restored the tags and some of the geometry from before changeset 106778710. Hopefully that helps and does not make the situation more difficult to work with. Thank you for contacting me about this.
hebolz (2021-09-14 15:37:37+00:00): Thank you very much, Belletower. I agree this is the best solution for the moment. And it allows me to complete the railway relation again.
wkdgs (2021-08-27 08:54:29+00:00): Hallo, 

ich hab die Adressen an den Garagen wieder entfernt.

Eine Adresse sollte nur einmal auf der Karte auftauchen und üblicherweise wird sie am Wohngebäude eingetragen.

LG
winkeldings
DressyPear4 (2021-08-25 16:28:49+00:00): Olá, ao invés de deletar o caminho você pode apenas clicar com botão direito no ponto e  dividir o caminho e depois alterar as informações.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110205517
archie (2021-08-25 06:40:05+00:00): Reverted cs. Du hast zum wiederholten Mal Gebäude, die richtig placiert waren verrutscht und damit ein offset eingefügt. Das meiste was du hier eingezeichnet hast hat einen imagary offset. Berichtige bitte dein Satelitenbild bevor du editierst. Gehe so vor: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-25 05:59:00+00:00): 已根据https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2329765
修订了六年前的设施
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-25 06:00:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/605892
Name from this
silversurfer83 (2024-01-16 08:59:45+00:00): Gude :)

du hast hier laut History den Bahnradweg an Wormeln entlang angelegt. Ich bin jetzt mal neugierig und würde gerne wissen, warum da so viele Informationen wie der alte Name und die Spurbreite (und und und) mindestens 2x, tw. sogar 3x am way getaggt sind.

Grüße
silversurfer83
Geofreund1 (2021-10-21 12:42:19+00:00): Hallo KVI0n,
das von dir eingetragene Wendeverbot an der Baiertaler Straße scheint mir doch sehr merkwürdig.
Könntest du bitte noch mal überprüfen, ob das so seine Richtigkeit hat?
Danke
jmty8 (2021-10-22 08:43:07+00:00): Hello Geofreund1, we've removed unnecessary no-u-turn restriction. Thank you for your comment.
Best regards!
(P.S.: KVI0n is on vacation today)
ivanbranco (2021-08-29 11:52:33+00:00): Hi pewelli,

what's the meaning of the OSM_BUILDING tag?

eg.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/594855933
OSM_BUILDING=house
building=farm_auxiliary

this building is an house or a farm auxialiary?
pewelli (2021-08-29 17:05:47+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for letting me now! 
We import buildings using this Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Norway_Building_Import

The tag OSM_BUILDING is supposed to be removed before uploading, but I must have forgotten to do so on this set. I have removed the tag now.
Milancer (2021-11-30 19:56:12+00:00): Ahoj, koukám, že v Milovicích - Boží Dar opět všechny stavby stojí, paráda :)
adamos (2021-12-01 09:03:03+00:00): AHoj Milane, to je to mapování od stolu... opravím to, dík za upozornění. Adam
abakus_uploader (2021-08-25 22:31:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
G_P_J (2021-08-26 08:30:16+00:00): Cześć, 
kilka uwag:
1. W adresach wiejskich nazwa miejscowości znajduje się w znaczniku addr:place. Nie wypełniaj znacznika addr:street, addr:city. Przykład błędu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259012747
2. znacznik "name" nie służy do opisów obiektów, tylko do wpisywania rzeczywistych nazw własnych. Opisy typu "garaż blaszak" ewentualnie można wpisać w znacznik "description", ale na pewno nie w "name". Przykłady błędów:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317163162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947007170
Proszę o wprowadzenie poprawek do Twoich zmian. 
Pozdrawiam
Piotr
syntex (2022-01-27 14:43:41+00:00): Dodałeś nazwy dróg i fajnie bo wszystko prawidłowo, ale czemu nie ruszyłeś adresacji?
G_P_J (2022-01-28 09:11:49+00:00): Cześć, 
z prostej przyczyny - nowa adresacja została dodana w listopadzie i grudniu 2021, a zamianę nazewnictwa ulic wprowadziłem 5 miesięcy temu. :) Mam podobny przypadek w mojej okolicy. Gmina nadała nazwy ulicom kilka miesięcy temu, ale jeszcze nie zmieniła adresacji na uliczną. 
Pozdrawiam,
Piotr
syntex (2022-01-28 10:40:15+00:00): Ah, czyli się nie śpieszyli z tym zmienianiem : )
SekeRob (2021-08-25 09:24:48+00:00): Hi

Is it a problem of Go Map!! editing tool that everyone between the US Great Lakes and Beijing gets to see this edit of 2 items on 12 nodes? If so, change editor, if not, kindly start saving your work in one country then move on to the next. 2 separate edit sets and only the local mappers would get to see your contribution which is the idea. Local mappers are able to review if correct.

Thanks

Everyone will thank you in advance.
GaoDY (2021-08-25 09:40:06+00:00): Hi,

Sorry about the confusion. I noticed this change too but really didn't know how to avoid it, since I just picked up this "hobby" and started with using Go Map. I didn't want to edit anything around Great Lakes but might have moved stuff by accident. I tried to undo everything but somehow it still got uploaded... That's why this ridiculous changeset across the globe I guess... Anyway I found Go Map does give some confusions, or maybe I need to learn more about it. Sorry again to everyone bugged by this change...

GaoDY
*abq* (2022-06-04 08:49:28+00:00): Hallo,
hier ist keine entsprechende Beschilderung für ein Verbot für Fußgänger.
VG
tubajoe (2022-06-04 10:54:30+00:00): Wie kann ich einsehen, welche Änderung (also welcher WEgabschnitt) das war? Ich kann mich nicht mehr erinnern, was openStreetComplete angezeigt hat.

Wenn es die Kappler Straße war, dann gibt es dort vielleicht kein Verbotsschild, aber einen Fußweg gibt es auch nicht. Für die Routenberechnung kann die Straße für Fußgänger also nicht hinzugezogen werden.

Oder wie müsste man das eintragen?
*abq* (2022-06-05 07:18:43+00:00): Ja, es geht um die Kapplerstraße. So wie du es schreibst, ist es auch richtig. Kein Gehweg, also sidewalk=no, aber *kein* foot=no. Es ist Aufgabe des Routers, das korrekt auszuwerten. Ein falsches Verbot einzutragen, nur damit es für einen Router eindeutiger wird, ist der falsche Weg. Betreten darfst du Straßen immer, außer es ist explizit verboten.
VG Reiner
tubajoe (2022-06-05 10:15:22+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die Info!
dcapillae (2021-08-25 08:01:49+00:00): Buenas tardes.

El 'green' ya está etiquetado como tal en el mapa. Los nombres en OSM no deben usarse para describir características. Más información: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Atentamente,

Daniel
dcapillae (2021-08-25 08:02:56+00:00): Consulte la guía de principiantes si necesita ayuda para comenzar a mapear: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
Nakaner-repair (2021-08-25 08:24:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 110158388, 110158471, 110158990.
muchichka_s (2021-08-25 09:05:36+00:00): До речі прямокутні будівлі дуже легко малювати в JOSM з плагіном buildings_tools. Там не треба клацати окремо по кожному куту і потім в кінці вирівнювати ...
kapitansup (2021-08-25 11:04:43+00:00): JOSM для мене поки темний ліс :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110214969
mavl (2021-08-26 16:20:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110297264 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5292].
Supaplex (2021-08-26 05:35:31+00:00): 請問為什麼刪除地址資訊，是建築已經拆除還是?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110215780
flohoff (2021-08-25 09:51:55+00:00): Der Zusatz Kreis Gütersloh ist ja nicht der name der Gemeinde oder?

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110215887
DeFra85 (2021-08-25 09:54:43+00:00): Steht so auf dem Schild
flohoff (2021-08-25 10:00:13+00:00): Ja - Aber das ist Zusatz - Da steht gerne auch mal "Ortsteil foo Kreis bar" - Das ist aber nicht der name der Gemeinde in die du gerade fährst
tux67 (2021-08-26 07:01:24+00:00): Hallo Semjon Walzebuk, 

anstatt die Firma auf den Address Node zu mappen, habe ich einen separaten mit den korrekten Tags angelegt.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110216259
user_4493657 (2021-08-25 09:03:04+00:00): *Usuwam :)
flohoff (2021-08-25 09:51:01+00:00): Guck dir nochmal den einen teil (Nord Süd an)

Das ist im name:

"Brandenburger Straße (zu Osterfeldstraße 38)"

Das ist natürlich unsinn.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110216702
OddlyAngled (2021-08-25 16:14:15+00:00): what change was intended to be made here? it looks like the existing way was deleted and it was replaced by a new one with nearly identical geometry
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110216968
tonyp_telenav (2021-08-26 09:19:09+00:00): Hi #OddlyAngled 
I didn't delete any geometry, I just split that line because it had too many nodes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110216968
OddlyAngled (2021-08-25 16:14:46+00:00): what change was intended to be made here? it looks like the existing way was deleted and it was replaced by a new one with nearly identical geometry
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110217110
andreia2_telenav (2021-08-26 06:29:17+00:00): Hi, this way was very big(<1200 nodes) and I split the way because it had too many nodes, that was all I did
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110217110
DD1GJ (2021-08-25 10:05:01+00:00): Bonjour Neral',
Pourriez-vous, s'il vous plaît, examiner de plus près l'historique, les commentaires et les descriptions des dossiers de modification antérieurs et les recouper avec une photographie aérienne récente avant de procéder à la modification ? Ils ont réactivé certaines éoliennes démantelées. Un exemple serait https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6617130356/history

Cordialement, Joachim

---

Hello Neral',
Would you please take a closer look at the history, past amendment record comments and descriptions and cross check with a recent aerial photograph before amending? You have reactivated some removed wind turbines. An example would be https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6617130356/history

Greetings, Joachim
user_5239402 (2021-08-25 09:47:47+00:00): 장기 계획, 제안되는 지물:Proposed
장은준 (2021-08-26 13:43:02+00:00): 영덕삼척고속도로 계획중인 고속도로: 제안:Proposed
장은준 (2021-08-26 14:02:46+00:00): 수정됨
mavl (2021-08-26 16:20:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110297264 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5292].
Frans S (2021-08-25 14:27:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110217688
i3ren (2021-08-26 10:55:53+00:00): It does exists.
mrKhan (2021-08-26 11:24:52+00:00): can't see it in aerial imagery. is it some temporary structure ?
i3ren (2021-08-26 11:43:33+00:00): Open street maps has an old imagery.
You can confirm this on other maps.
Visible Pitch and Boundary. It is an open air stadium
pyrog (2021-10-23 09:27:41+00:00): Salut Camille,

Pas besoin d'ajouter des tags operator:wikipedia=fr:Enedis quand tu ajoutes le tag operator:wikidata=Q3587594.

Je ne sais même pas si il y a un réel intérêt à ajouter operator:wikidata (mais c'est un autre problème).

Cordialement,
Yves
pyrog (2021-10-23 09:28:32+00:00): PS: c'était sur le transfo  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169480801
mavl (2021-08-26 16:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110297264 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5292].
Frans S (2021-08-25 14:25:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110218149
eggie (2021-08-25 09:49:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-25 09:52:22+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht. De info samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.
gr eggie