piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kartonage (2022-05-10 13:33:20+00:00): Hi,

as explained here already: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120081246, this airport is not active and your changes are wrong. The objects are correctly mapped as "abandoned:*". I have reverted your changes, again.

Please explain why you are changing them again.

Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Lejun (2022-05-11 06:40:07+00:00): Pas d’erreur apparente, merci pour la contribution !
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
angys (2022-05-10 17:03:04+00:00): Why name=name=Jalan.. ??? and should be PP also not Pp
Lorand88 (2022-05-11 03:49:51+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for telling me. I corrected!
Thank you!
Have a nice day!
Otenkiya (2022-05-15 02:10:16+00:00): ウェイを分断する場合は、既存のリレーションを壊さないよう配慮をお願いします。
MWXNG (2022-05-10 22:10:37+00:00): thanks for your contributions! there is a name:en tag on this store that is still left as CK's supermarket. you seem to have updated the name tag to co-operative, but not the name:en tag? can you confirm here that the store is now a co-op and then i can fix the tags? cheers
ze94a (2022-05-10 22:16:33+00:00): Sorry for the error, I meant to update the map since it is no longer a Co-operative, and instead is now a Ck Food stores.
Leo Slager (2022-05-12 09:12:39+00:00): Dag jozin,

Wat mij opvalt is dat je enorm veel fouten veroorzaakt.
Vooral de zich zelf kruisende wegen verhinderen dat een gebouw op de kaart kan worden weergegeven.
De vraag is nu worden deze fouten veroorzaakt door de gebruikte app of maak je zelf de tekenfouten ?
Hier kun je dat zien:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.46170&lat=50.91732&zoom=15&opacity=0.70
En hier zijn de fouten van een wat eerdere datum:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.33059&lat=50.81867&zoom=11&opacity=0.70
Msiipola (2022-08-01 09:46:27+00:00): Hej!
Små korta väger som leder till bosättningar ska ha typen "service". 
"Unclassfied" sätts på längre allmänna vägar och som binder ihop andra vägar.

Exempelvis  sträcka 1058919717 som du har lagt till, ska vara service.

Se även: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sv:Map_Features
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Hungerburg (2022-05-14 20:34:13+00:00): Welcome to Innsbruck :)
JeroenHoek (2022-05-15 16:40:28+00:00): Danke. Schöner Ort für ein Kurzurlaub.
user4816003805 (2022-05-11 17:43:22+00:00): Hi PManning232, welcome to OSM!
What's your source for adding this CVS? It's been closed for a while now, as can seen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3393044559/history
rab (2022-06-04 10:34:27+00:00): wirklich oneway?
Austrianton (2022-05-12 13:29:01+00:00): Please keep individual change-sets local. Such large change-sets spam the history feed

thanks
edgovard (2022-05-13 11:22:52+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your support, we always confine our edits to small geographical location.
This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again.
Thank you again, always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
edgovard
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-10 14:42:17+00:00): vi que você desenhou a via correntina, mas ela nao aparece nas imagens, ela ja existe ou é só um projeto? falo sobre esta via: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058924342
AgusQui (2022-06-18 00:15:35+00:00): No agregar public_transport=* a estaciones sin servicio de pasajeros, por favor ver: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AgusQui/diary/396933
MunicipalidadDePergamino (2022-06-21 10:42:09+00:00): Gracias Agus, lo debo haber editado sin prestarle atención, porque generalmente no me meto con los ferrocarriles
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-05-11 15:44:20+00:00): post_officer finde ich aber auch gut. ;-)
Danke für die Korrektur!
Austrianton (2022-05-12 13:28:16+00:00): Please keep individual edits local to avoid spamming the history feed all over the world.
avinet_ua (2022-05-13 22:14:20+00:00): stop doing this all over the world! do small changesets!

you spamming map!
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:58:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714052, 143714026, 143714035, 143714023 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
Lejun (2022-05-11 06:38:02+00:00): Vu et validé
Strubbl (2022-05-11 18:39:39+00:00): Habe diesen CS mal in der Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3000630 hinterlegt, dass das Ende des Jahres überarbeitet wird.
sanchi (2022-05-10 18:35:10+00:00): Hola. 
Creo que hay un error en esta edición. Lo de quitar la referencia N-630 me supongo que es porque ya no pertenece al estado. Pero lo de cambiar la N-620 a N-630 ¿Qué fuente has usado para ese cambio?. La N630 cruza de norte a sur, no va hacia portugal de este a oeste
Saludos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120796040
Amaiur22 (2022-05-10 21:16:51+00:00): Hola. Muchas gracias por tu mensaje. Te aclaro el razonamiento de los cambios que he hecho:
- En lo que respecta al tramo urbano de la N-630, tal y como dices, este es titularidad del Ayuntamiento y carece desde hace años categoría e identificador de carretera nacional. 
- En lo que respecta al tramo entre el enlace con la A-62/N-620 y la Glorieta de la Charrería, este estaba mal etiquetado como N-620. Tanto la cartelería in situ, como el catálogo oficial de carreteras, o el mapa oficial de carreteras nombran ese tramo como N-630. Puedes contrastarlo en la web del MITMA. Si necesitas más aclaraciones no dudes en contatar de nuevo. 

Gracias. Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120796040
sanchi (2022-05-18 19:19:17+00:00): Tienes razón. No tiene mucho sentido, es el único sitio en el que está así. No se cuando lo habrán cambiado pero es correcto.
Es bueno dejar la antigua referencia en old_ref pero bueno tampoco indispensable. Si tengo un rato lo añado.

Saludos.
Amaiur22 (2022-05-18 20:01:22+00:00): Genial! A mi también me pareció extraño, pero así es. He estado revisando cartografía antigua (mitades del s.XX) en el IGN y esta vía  ha tenido múltiples denominaciones. Efectivamente las más modernas son N-620 y N-630. Me parece interesante indicar old_ref.
Gracias y saludos.
jtn20 (2022-06-28 10:20:37+00:00): Similar to changeset 120821700, this deleted a valid restriction relation 5757086, I'm guessing due to a false-positive report at https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=87&error=77847677 . I've reinstated it in changeset 122949730.
PulisakZ (2022-07-13 06:44:28+00:00): Responded on previous comment.
mcliquid (2023-01-25 18:32:45+00:00): Hi, it's been a while since May, but why was the Via Papogna street closed for everyone (access=no) including bicycles and walkers?
Just asking because there is the Percorso Valle Maggia bicycle route and therefore "access=no" is somehow strange :)
Thanks (if you can remember)
sampeto (2023-01-25 19:00:16+00:00): Hi mcliquid
Thank you for your comment. Of course you're right, access=no makes no sense. I could remember the street and corrected the access tag.
mcliquid (2023-01-25 19:12:05+00:00): Wow, thanks a lot for you super fast reply! Very appreciate. Have a nice day!
Herman Lee (2022-05-10 15:13:04+00:00): 您好，个人建议是请把②扔到local_ref = 2中，谢谢
Natsu_ (2022-05-10 15:42:09+00:00): 在深圳市公共交通系统中，“罗沙路莲塘 ①”、“罗沙路莲塘 ②”是两个独立的站点。
站点名称中的“数字圆圈”为站点名称的一部分，而非作为站点/站台编号。
其它带有数字圆圈的公交站点同理。
>罗湖区 东门北路 北侧，只有“留医部 ②”一个站点。
Herman Lee (2022-05-10 15:46:57+00:00): 是的，我了解这一点，这里数字只是表示分站的位置，这里并不是一个合适作为站台名称的数据，这种表示应该还是放在local_ref里比较合适，local_ref是作为一个分站编号的标签，可以参考济南站在交通运输图层的渲染。
Herman Lee (2022-05-10 15:47:42+00:00): 而且作为数据分析来说，这种标注并不友好
Herman Lee (2022-05-10 15:49:06+00:00): （不要参考广州公交，实话实说那个是屎山。。。
Herman Lee (2022-05-10 15:49:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China/Transport/Buses
可以看看这个页面
ivanbranco (2022-05-10 15:52:19+00:00): I Sakweb,

I don't think that a few urban trees makes up a "forest". I would delete these landuses and just map them with natural=tree or natural=tree_row
Atlantic Blue (2022-05-11 09:39:07+00:00): Thanks for the advice!
vihrvy (2022-05-10 14:32:16+00:00): (I forgot the tag) Sources: Aerial imagery, Local knowledge
Mudumala (2022-05-25 09:47:06+00:00): Hi 喵耳引力波,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this region, I observed that one of the ways such as way 1058944933,way 1058949502,way 1058944934,way 478977328,way 1058944931,way 609926473, are created as secondary and tertiary road where one end of the way is connected to Primary, basis the classification, it would make sense for this road to be classified as a Primary too, as all roads connecting to it . would suggest that primary road classification can be given in this case. Please let us know if you think otherwise Thank you!

Regards,
Rajeswari.
喵耳引力波 (2022-05-25 09:56:23+00:00): Sorry, usually road class is gradually down grade.  So a road connected to primary may not be a primary. Or you will find every road can be deduced as primary. I haven't listen this rule at all.

I changed road grade to secondary/tertiary is  because those road is important enough to the city, and its phisical road condition truly higher than before grade.

I named this changeset as "VN" is because this is a boundary area in China. It's a joke, I'm sorry.

-----

Looks like you are from Grab VN team, I've heard this. Are you want to recruit mapper team in China?
喵耳引力波 (2022-05-25 09:59:48+00:00): If you say about the roundabout near the CN/VN boundary (and with a park nearby)

But looks like the secondary part don't serve daily transport in Dongxing city, it only direct to boundary. So I think is is less important than the main road.

---

That's also because it also connected to a tertiary bouder bridge, and I don't dare to edit the bridge.
喵耳引力波 (2022-05-25 10:05:45+00:00): tldr:

I think keeping my current edit is better.
whb (2022-05-17 08:18:55+00:00): Hallo,

falls der Weg jetzt wirklich privat sein sollte, dann wäre "private" anstatt "no" angebracht?
xyaq (2022-05-17 10:02:27+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, hab‘s auf Private geändert.
Patr1k_P (2022-05-13 14:32:41+00:00): place=locality sa pouziva pre neosidlene miesta

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=locality?

tu by som pouzil skor

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood
gscholz (2022-05-11 05:08:40+00:00): Hi Peter Agenga,
your recent changesets have created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=36.22735&lat=-0.00205&zoom=15

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120798063

Obviously you have "flatten" buildings that originally had a round shape.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Peter Agenga (2022-05-11 06:13:29+00:00): Thanks for the reminder, I had not filtered out circular buildings so while trying to square the rest they got affected
Lejun (2022-05-11 06:39:09+00:00): Attention au format des informations[1]. Je te laisse corriger, il faut :

– addr:housenumber=4 bis.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Adresses#Normalisation_du_suffixe_des_no_de_rue
Glassman (2022-05-10 17:10:47+00:00): I removed the inappropriate name on the house in Burlington. Please don't vandalize OSM. Also, please keep your edit within a small area. Save and upload before moving on to a more distant location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120798379
marczoutendijk (2022-05-10 19:59:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5987

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
danieldegroot2 (2022-08-02 11:31:28+00:00): Hey Reisinformatiegroep,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432220619

Hier zijn een aantal validator-oplossingen geaccepteerd zonder te kijken naar de satellietfoto.
Alle wegen die hier lopen, lopen onder de spoorbrug door. Er is geen sprake van een kruising.
"A level crossing (where a road crosses a railway on the same level; i.e., without a bridge)"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dlevel_crossing
(Hetzelfde voor railway=crossing, al staat dit niet op de wiki beschreven);
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dcrossing

Daarnaast is er geen goede changeset comment geschreven, wat er staat is van een andere edit.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Groet,

Daniel
eggie (2022-08-02 14:29:29+00:00): Aanvulling even van mij.. Dit soort acties zijn nauwelijks te checken in zo'n groot gebied.
Je edits ... Dan kun je nog een keer kijken.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120798412
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-02 14:42:02+00:00): Al die niet bestaande spoorwegovergangen heb ik verwijderd en de schade aan het spoor... Duplicated ways heb ik hersteld.
Dit vind ik een kwalijke manier van mappen met zo'n maproulette. 
MVG
eggie
Lejun (2022-05-11 06:37:31+00:00): J’ai un doute sur les informations. L’imagerie aérienne montre que ce chemin conduit à plusieurs places de stationnement qui ne sont probablement pas toutes rattachées au 36 ter.

En parallèle, name est mal utilisé dans ce cas-ci, on peut simplement le supprimer, idem pour le service=alley. L’attribut a une forte connotation américaine et je suis pas sur d’avoir encore vu d’exemple en France où il serait adéquat.
Lejun (2022-05-11 06:34:36+00:00): Attention au format des informations[1]. Je te laisse corriger, il faut :

– addr:housenumber=36 ter ;
– addr:street=rue de la République.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Adresses#Normalisation_du_suffixe_des_no_de_rue[1]
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:58:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714052, 143714026, 143714035, 143714023 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
ma-rt-in (2022-05-10 16:08:09+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe das löschen der Fahrschule wieder rückgänig gemacht und dann die POI entsprechend angepasst. Nur weil es die Fahrschule nicht mehr gibt, jedch die Räume da sind, muss man nicht gleich die Node löschen. Wir haben dafür den lifecycle prefix.

vg
alester (2022-05-10 17:27:22+00:00): There isn't a book shop here. I had already updated the previous one you added to the correct tag of amenity=public_bookcase. I've removed this new "shop".
user_5359 (2022-05-11 09:43:25+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058956823 (one of seven).
What ist the meaning of the foreign keys (this ways doesn't any OSM keys)? What is the license of this data?

Acres 	40.0
CountyName 	Dickinson
FullLegalN 	TRG Threshold Timber Michigan LLC
GlobalID 	{289B3A9E-52B2-4270-BD59-2336F42F4817}
LegalDesc 	SW1/4 OF SW1/4
ListNumber 	28
ListYear 	1968
Notes 	MDOT IMPORT
OBJECTID 	3090515.0
OwnerParce 	2007-08-13T20:00:00
OwnerTypeT 	Forest Industry
ParcelChan 	1995-10-06T10:52:37
ParcelSt_1 	1967-12-31T19:00:00
ParcelStat 	Active
Range 	30W
SchoolDist 	North Dickinson County Schools
Section 	34
Shape__Are 	163466.47876249999
Shape__Len 	1617.2610889283546
Town 	43N
TownName 	Sagola
created_da 	2020-10-23T15:25:52
created_us 	FORESTADMIN
last_edi_1 	2020-10-23T15:25:52
last_edite 	FORESTADMIN
parid 	9062.0
user_5359 (2022-05-17 08:55:56+00:00): tags have been removed!
Skunkman56 (2022-05-18 14:45:26+00:00): Thanks, sorry I had not gotten to it.
dadavid (2022-10-31 09:49:40+00:00): Hi muc-rider, 

ich habe den Gebäudenamen hier mal etwas angepasst, da das als Name der gesamten Schule eingetragen war (amenity=school vs building=). Ich hoffe das passt so für dich, bin aber für Feedback/Anpassungen offen!

Grüße
David
MWXNG (2022-05-10 22:01:17+00:00): what changes occured here? why is the changeset area so large?
Aikonhill (2022-05-10 22:33:07+00:00): 1 mural, 1 sculpture, 1 post box, 1 observation tower, 1 information board & 1 bird hide in different locations across the area. 6 edits from what i can see
tentotwo (2022-05-11 10:00:55+00:00): Apologies for the large changeset area. These are a couple of minor spatially disjoint updates that I created using the OSM Go app and forgot to upload.
DD1GJ (2022-05-11 09:37:52+00:00): Doppeleintrag gelöscht. Real ist bereits als Gebäude eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41278714

Willkommen bei OSM. Weiter Informationen findest Du z.B. bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
eggie (2022-05-10 16:11:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
b-jazz (2022-06-05 01:25:26+00:00): Hello NewSchool19,

I'm making some edits to some of your contributions in the area and thought you might want to know what I've changed so you can avoid the problem in the future. I see that several ways have been reusing nodes and portions of the way in an effort to make one long continuous path. There is a rule that says you shouldn't do that so I'm breaking up the ways where I see that. Hope this helps. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out.
eggie (2022-05-10 16:12:46+00:00): Timo  Een tip...  Niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.. Doe zoiets in twee aparte changesets. Schuiven kan schade geven door onbedoelde verplaatsingen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-10 16:13:21+00:00): en hier dus ook 	Prins Mauritslaan 14 staat nu ergens anders
eggie (2022-05-10 16:14:25+00:00): Svp de adresnode gebuiken om een winkel op bij te taggen.Geen gebouwen veranderen. Luchtfoto's vertekenen.
eggie (2022-05-10 16:18:34+00:00): De schade heb ik hersteld
Timomidd (2022-05-10 17:20:53+00:00): Dank voor de feedback, ik wist niet dat hier zo'n verschil in zat en het schade kan aanrichten. Ik zal er in het vervolg op letten.
eggie (2022-05-10 17:25:19+00:00): Hoi Timo.. Dat komt omdat je selecteert met de linkermuis .. de adresnode.. en dan gaat schuiven met diezelfde linkermuis.
Met editor josm schuif je bv met de rechtermuistoets.

De winkel staat nu op de node met shop=do_it_yourself
Mapse verder
Eggie
Kovoschiz (2022-05-10 17:41:30+00:00): Don't remove `natural=wood` when adding `leisure=garden`. They describe different things.
ivanbranco (2022-07-16 18:21:33+00:00): Ciao Franco,

ho il dubbio che tu abbia mappato centinaia di numeri civici (quantomeno fino al 2019 circa) utilizzando addr:unit invece di addr:housenumber: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kaA

Riusciresti a dargli un'occhiata e magari a fixarli?
Francoerbi41 (2022-07-16 18:43:42+00:00): Ciao.
i numeri civici non sono la mia specialità.
Ne ho mappati centinaia solo nella mia città (Arona) durante il lockdown del 2020.
Posso averne inserito qualcuno, ma dubito, nella zona del  lago d'Orta, non sicuramente centinaia.
Potresti essere più preciso?
grazie
ivanbranco (2022-07-16 19:21:21+00:00): Ci sono 236 indirizzi aventi il tag addr:unit senza addr:housenumber creati da te, se apri questo link te li estrae quasi* tutti: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kaA

*quasi perché sono esclusi quelli che sono stati successivamente modificati da altri utenti
Francoerbi41 (2022-07-16 19:56:41+00:00): uau, malissimo.
Neile prossime settimane me i smarronerò a mano.
Naturalmente se tu sei in grado di fare una modifica in blocco te ne sarò riconoscente.
ciao
FE
Francoerbi41 (2022-07-17 07:12:32+00:00): Grazie.
FE
eggie (2022-05-10 16:15:57+00:00): Svp niet dubbel taggen. De school stond al op de kaart. 
In dit geval kun je ook de naam van het schoolterrein halen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-05-10 16:22:59+00:00): Driedubbele tagging verwijderd
MxxCon (2022-05-10 22:51:08+00:00): Hello.
There are multiple problems with your edit.
You mapped this business as both, tags on the building and as separate POI node. Doing this goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

You used "description" field for blatantly promotional messaging which goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

You used facebook page as a website tag instead of contact:facebook.
ivanbranco (2022-05-10 21:24:11+00:00): Hi KvardeX,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14125689

what' the meaning of place=tertiary?
ChillyDL (2022-05-11 12:16:06+00:00): Hallo Glitch-Hunter, hast du einen Beleg, dass das Hügelgrab allen Ernstes "Hügelgrab" heißt? Das scheint doch eher eine Gattungsbezeichnung zu sein, die durch site_type=tumulus bereits abgedeckt ist. Eine Name "Hügelgrab" wäre äußerst ungewöhnlich, auch in der Literatur und den Denkmalschutzakten. Wo hast du den Namen her?
Glitch-Hunter (2022-05-11 12:57:16+00:00): da ist ein Sein auf deisem hügel mit der inschrift Hügelgrab
Glitch-Hunter (2022-05-11 13:31:57+00:00): als Referenz  könnte dir Kommot helfen
ChillyDL (2022-05-11 20:36:23+00:00): Ah, danke - auf dem Schild von der Denkmalbehörde, das bei Komoot abfotografiert zu sehen ist, sehe ich gar keinen Hinweis auf diesen Namen. "Hügelgrab" ist offensichtlich einfach nur die Bezeichnung, kein Name für dieses eine Hügelgrab unter vielen. Ich nehme den name-Tag deshalb wieder raus. Viele Grüße!
5m4u9 (2022-05-11 19:22:45+00:00): hola, los centros de salud no son hospitales, a lo máximo podrían ser clínicas.
user_12531033 (2022-05-10 16:44:09+00:00): 昌平站之后也有偏移量，烦死人。
Noen (2022-05-10 18:57:52+00:00): Hei og velkommen til Openstreetmap!
Dette var et litt uheldig første endringsett. Du har flyttet to punkter med et uhell, og lagt til et navn på en adresse. Adresser har ikke navn.
Prøv gjerne igjen! Tegn opp næringsparken som et område, tag den som kommersielt område og legg til navnet igjen.
jpennycook (2022-05-10 17:03:00+00:00): Hi!

You added two items that seem odd:-
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058990732 - I've not seen any signs saying this part of town is called "ends".  If this is the correct name, should it be capitalised?
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1058990733 - is this house really called "the crib"?  You might want to look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom#Address_tags

Jon
therealoliver (2022-05-11 16:43:59+00:00): Sorry it must’ve been a mistake, I will rectify it as soon as I can
gscholz (2022-05-11 05:08:30+00:00): Hi Peter Agenga,
your recent changesets have created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=36.22735&lat=-0.00205&zoom=15

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120803075

Obviously you have "flatten" buildings that originally had a round shape.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
jeslop (2022-05-10 17:29:38+00:00): Hola Amancio, bienvenido a OSM y gracias por tus aportaciones.

Antes de continuar con tus ediciones puedes tener más información aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Sobre tus ediciones: en este caso das información personal sobre la propiedad de una casa, algo que no está permitido en OSM. Además la etiqueta name no está para eso, lee más sobre ello aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres

En otras ediciones has intentado meter curvas de nivel, algo que no está contemplado en OSM. 

Te recomiendo que te pongas en contacto con la comunidad gallega en  https://t.me/osmgalicia, con la española en https://t.me/OSMes y en todo caso a través de la lista oficial de correo: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/. Allí podrás consultar todas las dudas que te puedan surgir.

Te corrijo estos errores y te animo a seguir contribuyendo al mapa.

Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
NieWnen (2022-05-11 11:36:21+00:00): Dlaczego tory zostały nazwane? Tory raczej nie mają swojej nazwy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-12 12:15:35+00:00): Czy te zmapowane w tej edycji tory istnieją lub mają zauważalne ślady?