piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flohoff (2014-12-30 10:07:00+00:00): Hi,
das ist ein riesen changeset der Braunschweig, Hannover bis Bielefeld umfasst. Und leider hast du keinen Kommentar im Changset was du da überhaupt gemacht hast.

Flo
otti (2014-12-30 14:35:53+00:00): Hi Flo,

ich habe lediglich ein paar Unzulänglichkeiten auf meiner Weihnachtstour durch Deutschland bereinigt. (Hausnummern, Öffnungzeiten, ...)

Ich schreibe beim nächsten Mal einen Kommentar und halte die Fläche etwas kleiner *g*
escada (2015-01-05 15:27:52+00:00): Beste, zou het mogelijk zijn om in de toekomst een commentaar bij uw changeset te plaatsen, zodat andere mappers weten wat en waarom iets gewijzigd is ?
Alvast bedankt voor uw medewerking.
GrafzuAdelheide (2021-09-26 15:03:54+00:00): Moin,
gehe ich recht in der Annahme, dass die Verbindungen über die saisonal kaum passierbaren Grünstreifen dem Routing für Fahrräder dienen? Ich würde dafür plädieren, nur tatsächlich befahrbare Wege als solche einzuzeichnen. Nicht jeder Radfahrer ist bereit oder in der Lage, das Rad über die Berme zu tragen. Gibt es dazu einen Konsens?
Freundliche Grüße
WegefanHB (2021-09-26 18:08:10+00:00): Moin,
ich war lange nicht mehr in der Gegend. Bist Du so nett und nimmst die Tragestrecke heraus - fahren sollte man ja wenigstens dort können.
Beste Grüße Michael!
MConte79 (2014-12-29 19:33:42+00:00): I work here
naoliv (2015-04-08 03:34:56+00:00): Cesar, ficaram vários trechos com classificação errada após o seu ajuste. Por exemplo, aqui na DF-150, existem vários motorway_link que deveriam se tornar trunk_link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-15.65527/-47.84534
Na BR-020 tem casos assim também.
cesarlanzoni (2015-04-08 12:16:49+00:00): Fiz as correções, mas acho que existe um erro fundamenta no plano piloto: nas vias mais centrais das asas o pedestre não tem acesso e não existe cruzamento em nível, dai deveriam estar classificados como motorway, e não como estão atualmente como trunk
naoliv (2015-04-08 12:40:09+00:00): Eu quis dizer nessas ligações: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304105292
Repare que não estão corretas.
E usar motorway na faixa central vai ficar desconexo (uma motorway no meio do nada, sem ligação com outras motorways, além de ter um trecho curto). Talvez seja o caso só de aplicar restrição de acesso para pedestres.
Alguns locais que eu acho que a classificação está maior do que o necessário seria https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-15.8029/-47.9596 por exemplo. Note que não existe via residencial.
Ou então esses pequenos trechos secondary https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-15.7607/-47.8810 que ligam uma primary com uma tertiary. Também não me parece necessário utilizar secondary nestes casos.
mhenson (2014-12-30 14:16:26+00:00): Your phone number on Mazzio's Pizza has the wrong area code. Stillwater is 405 not 580.
trigpoint (2014-12-29 21:18:03+00:00): There is already a village node for weston
chillly (2014-12-29 20:39:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
I'm guessing that the building name is not actually 'Home'. :-)
mueschel (2023-05-17 18:26:33+00:00): Hi,
a long time ago you added "sube" tags on three shops. What do they mean? Could you check for a better tag?
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3257422167
chillly (2014-12-29 21:39:50+00:00): A building has been tagged a landuse military.
trigpoint (2014-12-30 13:06:15+00:00): I have fixed the issues in Wem
trigpoint (2014-12-29 21:00:41+00:00): The section of drawwell lane you have added a oneway tag to, isn't.
Please revert it
chillly (2014-12-29 21:19:00+00:00): Is the service road really one way? How could one get to part of the road. 

Is it possible that you don't understand that your edits are being saved and made public?
GerdP (2015-10-21 14:43:29+00:00): please review:
way 319479338 has the tag 
highway=obsoloete
What do you try to say with this?
Is it an existing way that will be destroyed soon? Or is it obsolete in OSM because there is no way?
Endres Pelka (2015-02-10 12:53:02+00:00): Ten changeset usuwa numer budynku i building=yes. Zakrawa na wandalizm. Rewertuję.
GerdP (2015-11-04 14:47:39+00:00): please help me to understand: I found a few ways in OSM that you tagged 
highway=obsolete. What does that mean?
Sample:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18478499
Bing seems to show a track or path there.
Durko_freemap (2015-01-07 12:09:22+00:00): zdravim kimmi, aky zdroj dat ste pouzil pri zmene nazvu tejto ulice?
urk (2025-09-13 08:34:27+00:00): Moin, es ist lang her (2014), aber weißt du noch, ob due den Straßennamen "Birkenhof" aufgrund einer entsprechenden Beschilderung getaggt hast? Tatsächlich gibt es (mittlerweile?) ein Straßenschild "Drangstedter Postweg".
dwausr (2015-01-08 15:17:29+00:00): Servus,

irgendwas scheint bei Deinem edit schief gegangen zu sein, was den user osmtraveller dazu veranlasst hat, reihenweise Straßen und Wege zu löschen, weil diese in keepright und JOSM als Fehler angezeigt wurden. Da ich in Bahnbrücken richtig wenig Ortskenntnis habe - könntest Du Dich drum kümmern? Der Löschbearbeitungssatz ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27884376 und ich hab diesen schon etwas kommentiert ;-)
chillly (2014-12-31 12:17:38+00:00): This edit has added alleys (known locally as ten foots) as residential roads. Was this surveyed or added from aerial imagery alone? A survey would have shown how wrong this is. 

I'm tempted to revert this edit, as the quality is too poor.
pizzaiolo (2015-01-05 20:19:29+00:00): Hi there! This was based on aerial imagery and a comparison with Google Maps. Feel free to revert it if you wish. Cheers.
chillly (2015-01-05 20:34:09+00:00): Any use of Google maps breaks their terms of use. Comparing with G maps tempts you into copying from it if you see more detail. This is, of course, forbidden. I suggest to leave G maps completely alone when editing OSM. I reverted your edit and replaced it with a more accurate edit based on aerials and local knowledge.
jenda (2015-02-11 13:16:20+00:00): dobry den, nejsem si jist co znamena tato editace, ale kolem ulice "Polivkova" to vytvorilo podivne ostruvky "residential" ploch, ktere by slo obcas interpretovat jako chodniky ... a obcas zase ne. Jde o nejaky hromadny import ktery je ted dobre rucne opravit?

dekuji - Jan Lana
pedro' (2015-02-16 00:33:35+00:00): Zdravím,

jedná se o "import" druhů pozemku z RUIAN. Dělá se Tracerem "ručně" (tedy klikáním).

Problém spočívá v tom, že jde o kolizi landuse a landuse. landuse=residential je jistě správně stejně jako landuse=garden,garden_type=residential. Zahrada je ovšem o něco menší než ta oblast, o které se dá říci, že je residential. Z toho pak vznikly ty  ostrůvky. Tracer pracuje tak, že vytvoří oblast, přičemž upraví stávající oblast. Prostě to udělá tak, aby se nepřekrývaly oblasti se stejným tagem landuse=*. Druhá varianta je naplácat obě oblasti přes sebe. Ani jedno není dokonalé a sám celkem pochybuji o tom, jestli byl dobrý nápad pustit se do "zazelenění Prahy". Jsou hotové asi 2/3 Prahy a teď opravdu nevím, zda mám pokračovat a dodělat poslední třetinu či to nechat být či se pokusit ty changesety zrušit :-(

--
Petr
jenda (2015-02-16 09:57:36+00:00): asi ne, jen to bude potreba pak rucne opravit. Je oblast Jinonic uz doimportovana? BTW muj email je lana.jan@gmail.com, pres tohle se opravdu blbe diskutuje ...
xificurk (2015-04-26 21:48:00+00:00): Ahoj, při tom klikání by to chtělo taky trochu přemýšlet... nezanedbatelné množství ploch, co jsi naimportoval jako landuse=farmland, jsou už dávno residenční čtvrti - a ty domy dokonce v OSM jsou!
luschi (2015-08-20 18:59:20+00:00): An der Paunsdorfer Allee Kreuzung Hermelinstraße hast du mit dieser Änderung den Ampelblitzer, welchen ich 2014(3 Tage vor dieser Änderung) hier eingetragen habe, teilweise gelöscht.
Ebenso hast du die Ampel gelöscht und 2 getrennte Fahrbahnen eingetragen wo eine Fahrbahn mit mehreren Spuren und Abbiegespuren ist.
Blitzer und Ampel habe ich jetzt wieder richtig eingetragen, ebenso habe ich die unnötige getrennte Fahrbahn wieder korrigiert.
Abbiegespuren werde ich noch ergänzen.
lg
syskenjp (2014-12-30 03:19:23+00:00): 温泉のスポットを登録しました。
syskenjp (2014-12-30 03:20:16+00:00): 温泉のスポットを登録しました。
skquinn (2014-12-30 01:52:56+00:00): I entered a proper comment for this, not sure what happened. "Resolve note 293460: change name of hospital/medical campus"
clevelandpotter (2014-12-30 04:00:12+00:00): Hello community - I am new here and trying to help out the best that I can.
Nakaner (2015-01-28 20:15:45+00:00): Die Gebäude in Sennfeld sind doch nicht alle so schief, oder? :-) In iD und auch in JOSM gibt es eine Funktion, die Polygone rechtwinklig macht. In iD das Objekt anklicken, damit das runde Menü auftaucht und das Rechteck-Icon anklicken.
gileri (2014-12-30 17:29:11+00:00): Les passages piétons/vélo que vous avez rajouté sur les voies de tram n'ont pas de zébra. (l'éditeur iD met crossing=zebra automatiquement)
frosm (2020-02-04 00:30:16+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161783426
quel est la source pour ce nom ?
la partie ouest s'appelle Route d'Arcis selon les adresses de 2 maisons qui s'y trouve et selon le cadastre. j'ai par conséquent coupé la route en 2 à la frontière communale
bubix (2014-12-30 08:22:43+00:00): Osservatorio Astronomico di Genova (OAG)
fserges (2014-12-31 12:58:22+00:00): Данный пакет правок был частично откачен так как в нём была удалена точка НП.
frosm (2024-09-09 19:18:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319528633
qu'est-ce que c'est ? 
une piste cavalière spécifiquement conçue pour les voitures ?
indigomc (2016-10-06 06:36:09+00:00): A reference 'Google Map' appears on one of the roads in this changeset. This should be checked, if necessary the road should be removed and redrawn.
muzirian (2017-03-05 06:58:30+00:00): I have tried to reach this user on multiple platforms and he is not repsonding to this.
looks like it should be reported to dwg
ranjithsiji (2017-04-29 14:57:49+00:00): Sorry for very late replay. I personally gone through these roads. with my phone. But when I am trying to draw this roads on the map I got confused a lot. So I tried to create a route on google map and draw here. If so important please mark which roads to be removed and please process the removal. I will again go through these roads and get a gpx file from osmtracker and upload. No problem.
muzirian (2017-04-29 15:27:25+00:00): We cant refer google maps or any other closed source maps to trace on osm.
Those roads you taggged with source as google is already removed.You dont have to go again to map those roads, gpx is already available for parts and imagery is lot better now. :)
Peda (2017-04-04 21:57:53+00:00): Hi ranjithsiji,

I know this is a very old changeset. I'm still wondering what ref=Google Map is supposed to mean on [that way](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319533532).

OpenStreetMap is very careful in which sources are used and allowed. We're really careful to keep our database free of proprietary/copyrighted material. And if someone (accidentally) used such forbidden sources, we have to revert those changes and possibly even redact them.

Could you please elaborate on which source you used for this (and other) changesets?

Thanks,  
Peda
SomeoneElse (2015-01-04 12:51:34+00:00): FWIW I'm not familiar with the name despite having driven along here quite a bit, but seems to be a loc_name: http://www.buxtonadvertiser.co.uk/news/local/bakewell-it-was-a-joy-to-be-with-her-mum-s-tribute-to-13-bends-crash-victim-1-5605574
wiedergaenger (2014-12-30 11:30:03+00:00): Hey,
Bitte keine Abkürzungen bei Namen verwenden (Komturstr. anstatt Komturstraße). Die Datenbank sollte die korrekte Schreibweise enthalten. Abkürzungen können auf der Darstellungsebene (z.B. Kartenrenderer) noch immer geschehen. Und was ist mit dem westlichen Teil der Straße der als "Privatstraße" benannt ist, die entsprechenden Zugangsberechtigung gesetzt ist und als Einbahnstraße markiert ist.
YoMama78 (2014-12-30 12:36:08+00:00): Der westliche Teil der Straße ist eher eine Hinterhofgasse. Da dort keine Hausnummern bzw. Eingänge sind kann ich nicht mit Sicherheit sagen, ob dieser Teil auch Teil der Komturstraße ist.
Es ist jedoch keine Einbahnstraße und auch öffentlich.
romanh (2014-12-30 16:16:47+00:00): Hallo Adrian, 
Du hast irgendwas an der Hochspannungsleitung zerstört. :-(
Werde es reparieren. Gruss Roman
yaugenka (2017-09-27 23:41:32+00:00): и вот эта деревня живая вроде как еще и по кадастру и по снимкам.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243042738
LLlypuk82 (2017-09-28 12:21:47+00:00): судя по яндексу, там оставался один дом в 2015. Нечто похожее на огород ещё видно, но деревня скорее мертва, как и соседняя.
yaugenka (2017-09-28 17:54:43+00:00): По переписи 2016-го там 1 человек. Пусть живет и здравствует.
user_5359 (2014-12-31 08:17:31+00:00): Steht der Postkasten links oder rechts von der "Große Telegraphenstraße"?
SomeoneElse (2015-01-01 21:53:40+00:00): Would it be possible in future to use slightly more descriptive changeset comments than "General Fixes" (and also to create changesets that are smaller in area)?
Benito Rivera y Quiroga (2015-01-03 21:31:32+00:00): I agree with the previous comment. The changes made here have break some multipolygones (in Bolivia) and I have to fixed it again.
Hjart (2014-12-31 17:00:50+00:00): Hvordan ser den her shelter ud?
Mic1004a (2015-01-02 13:14:55+00:00): Hej Hjart

Det er et helt alm. Shelter type der er i alt 3 stk, intet vand eller toilet.
Hjart (2015-01-02 13:33:30+00:00): Tak. Det er altså en generel "primitiv lejr/teltplads"? Jeg spørger for evt at kunne tagge det lidt anderledes/tilføje lidt mere info.
Supaplex (2014-12-30 17:50:59+00:00): What is this? A fiction building in the ocean is not allowed in the OpenStreetMap Database
dforsi (2014-12-30 17:23:15+00:00): Non hai specificato cosa rappresenta la 319555414 quindi al momento è inutilizzabile
romanh (2014-12-30 15:01:17+00:00): Vielen Dank fürs fixen und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr.
Gruss Roman
uk_jay (2015-02-03 18:43:23+00:00): I'm afraid this edit is quite dramatically incorrect. These aren't service roads accessible to the public, they are private tracks around a golf-course (some asphalt, some rutted). Also, sections have been incorrectly designated as public footpaths: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319557598

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319557595

Also, the additional parking aisle near the station is not accurate (now corrected). 

It seems like these edits have been done from satellite, without ever visiting the place.
uk_jay (2015-02-03 18:45:40+00:00): The changeset also incorrectly removes public footpath designation from a section of track:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319557603
uk_jay (2015-02-07 12:35:44+00:00): I have corrected these errors as much as I can from local knowledge.

You need to explain how you are making your changes. They are obviously done from satellite, and that's fine as long as the process is documented, and you are careful. These were breaking changes made remotely, you made no comment, and have not responded to enquiry. Please reconsider your editing process.
mavl (2015-01-02 10:49:14+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Спасибо за добавленные улицы.
Ещё было бы хорошо указать тип покрытия улиц (асфальт - surface=asphalt, гравий - surface=gravel, земля - surface=ground и другие).
dforsi (2014-12-30 17:29:51+00:00): Non  hai specificato cosa rappresentano le way 319563905 e 319563908 quindi la momento sono inutilizzabili. Se sono strade agricolo-forestali metterei highway=track poi per segnalare che sono private metti access=private se bisogna parlare col proprietario per passare, altrimenti guarda il wiki per gli altri valori di access; se ci sono cancelli o sbarre, aggiungi anche il tag barrier su un nodo della way in corrispondenza
dforsi (2014-12-30 17:31:47+00:00): Hai diseganto una linea ma non hai specificato cosa è, quindi al momento è inutilizzabile, guarda il wiki per tutti i dettagli
romanh (2014-12-30 16:10:33+00:00): Vielen Dank. Gruss Roman
cr1 (2014-12-30 23:56:16+00:00): Heinrich-Böll-Straße hinzugefügt (Neubaugebiet mit zehn Grundstücken).
ToeBee (2015-01-02 03:20:50+00:00): Thanks for your additions to the map! Note that in OSM we prefer to not use abbreviations. Please spell out Street, Road, Drive, etc. It is easier to automatically abbreviate things for display than it is to try to automatically expand abbreviations correctly. Is "St" Street or Saint? :)
robert (2015-01-03 01:44:24+00:00): Did you mean to remove/break the name "Harvieston Villas" here? http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=934149
NorthBeric (2015-01-03 12:51:27+00:00): Hi, yes. The eight houses forming Harvieston Villas were demolished to form the new station car park.
uvi (2017-02-21 16:35:45+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3260086953
Handelt es sich hierbei um einen richigen Milchautomaten oder nur um eine Verkaufsstelle?
Kommen Waren aus dem Regal, ist m.E. zusätzlich shop=farm mit der description, welche Sachen es dort gibt, korrekt. Sobald ein Automat steht, sollte der doch so auch erscheinen und recherchierbar sein. Ich denke, es empfiehlt sich folgendes Beispiel: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545
Gruß Uwe
dforsi (2014-12-30 17:39:35+00:00): Servirebbe un'etichetta in modo che i programmi capiscano di cosa si tratta, ad esempio shop=trade con trade=building_supplies
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade
cadsauxk (2016-11-12 22:12:33+00:00): Prezado Colega, Track é apenas via agrícola (por exemplo atravessando um pasto). Você converteu as vias que eu havia mapeado corretamente como unclassified para track. Estou revertendo este mapeamento, pois o correto é unclassified.

abraço

Gerald
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-01-13 19:32:07+00:00): Proszę nie dodawać landuse=residential do granic.
pawka007 (2015-01-13 19:45:25+00:00): To tymczsowe rozwiazanie obrabiam teraz te miejscowosci jak skoncze to zabudowa bedzie zlikwidowana z granic nie moge zniesc tych bialych miejscowosci ;)
cadsauxk (2016-11-12 22:08:40+00:00): Caro Colega, Rua Residencial não pode ser Track (trilha agrícola), mapeie como residencial não pavimentada, highway=residential, surface=unpaved

abraço
skyper (2015-01-15 21:43:57+00:00): Hey

Kannst Du Dir bitte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319602264 nochmal anschauen. surface=gravel halte mich für falsch.
q_un_go (2015-01-15 21:52:42+00:00): Das ist m.E. auch falsch. Da habe ich wohl gepennt. surface=paved, und path hat auch keinen tracktype, oder doch?
skyper (2015-01-15 22:54:35+00:00): Eher paved, besser asphalt/paving_stones/cobblestones/sett etc.



Das Problem von tracktype bleibt bei path dasselbe. Entweder es bezieht sich auf den Unterbau oder der Bezug geht verloren, da unterschiedliche Vorbewegungsarten/mittel es unterschiedlich interpretieren, ähnlich wie smoothness. Generell habe ich aber kein Problem mit tracktype auch an breiten Wegen.
q_un_go (2015-01-15 23:05:18+00:00): Die Oberfläche sieht nach Asphalt ausm halt geteert. Die Frage nach tracktype bezog sich eher darauf, dass der Weg ja path und nicht track ist. Klar, wenn tracktype, dann grade1. Die Breite geht auch eher gegen 2m - ist ja auf dem Sat-Bild fast so breit wie eine Fahrspur auf der Straße nebendran, und die geht eher gegen 3m.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-01 13:38:16+00:00): This looks very much like a mechanical edit.  Where was it discussed as per http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy ?
rfuegen (2015-01-01 15:40:11+00:00): this was a manual update, removing obsolete "man_made=pipeline" tags from nodes that obviously are markers, in accordance to the pipeline wiki page. 

each node was checked manually.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-01 15:56:48+00:00): You edited http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline&action=history to say "substance" instead of "type".  Where was it discussed?  How would someone who uses pipeline data from OSM or has a map of pipelines know that they should now be looking for a "substance" instead of "type"?
rfuegen (2015-01-01 16:17:46+00:00): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2014-November/020093.html
SomeoneElse (2015-01-01 16:23:43+00:00): That appears to be a message from you on the tagging list.  It is not "
    Either the international, English-language list
    or the international, English-language imports list, for fixing of previous imports
    or if your edit affects only a small number of countries, the national-language mailing lists, forums, or other standard communication methods for the countries or areas affected by the change"
rfuegen (2015-01-01 16:35:02+00:00): what do you want? I followed the whole proposal process:
1) created a draft
2) open it for discussion on the proposal talk page AND the tagging maliling list. see section 4 of the proposal process wiki page) and read the whole thread, not just my post.
3) the proposal was voted for and approved by 18:4 votes.

the global "mechanical edit" process will be initiated after the holiday season is over. is there a law preventing manual edits of tags that have been approved?
SomeoneElse (2015-01-01 22:23:35+00:00): http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy is very clear.  Discussion should take place on "Either the international, English-language list
or the international, English-language imports list, for fixing of previous imports
or if your edit affects only a small number of countries, the national-language mailing lists, forums, or other standard communication methods for the countries or areas affected by the change".

Very few people read the tagging list; even fewer read a proposal page that you've just created.  The reason for wider discussion is twofold - (a) so that people who may be affected by your change get a chance to comment on it and (b) so that people know that the change is happening and can change their data extraction or map style accordingly.  22 people voting on a wiki page is a tiny, tiny, percentage of the people who map in OSM.
Math1985 (2015-01-01 23:15:38+00:00): Responded here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2015-January/020720.html
mcld (2015-01-01 23:15:54+00:00): 2 ways and 13 nodes is not a big edit. For such a small amount of objects, please could @SomeoneElse critique the CONTENT of the changes rather than trying to bring the heavy weight of Mechanical Edits Policy down on it? (I ask this irrespective of whether MEP is pertinent here.) It seems to me that the number of objects is so small that the problem here - if there is indeed a problem of content - is not "mechanical edit" but "armchair edit" (here I'm presuming @rfuegen did not visit all those places!)
rfuegen (2015-01-01 23:41:30+00:00): @mcld I personally surveyed ~1600 markers in the field in my area. therefore I should have some experience to change markers in other countries without causing havoc. actually, using both man_made=pipeline and pipeline=marker on a single node was just wrong and that was the main purpose of the change.
apart from that, if we remove all armchair edits from the database, it would be half empty.
rfuegen (2015-01-02 00:22:00+00:00): @SomeoneElse The proposal wiki page says nothing about consulting the MEP during the proposal process. and it explicitly mentions  tagging@openstreetmap.org. quote: "Let people know of your new proposal by sending a mail to the tagging mailing list, not the talk list. "

a discussion on the MEP will be initiated and ITO has been notified https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ITO_Map_ideas#Pipelines_without_a_type.3D.2A_tag
mcld (2015-01-02 09:50:19+00:00): @rfuegen OK, thanks for the info. no complaint from me
dforsi (2014-12-30 18:51:45+00:00): Questa non mi sembra una buona modifica perché hai impoverito la mappa trasformando un isolato in un singolo edificio.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 02:22:13+00:00): Hi - just wondered if http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328650707 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328650724 should be part of the "Granön" relation?  They're both inners, and don't seem to be inside the main island.
Cheers,
Andy
Tbobx (2014-12-30 18:43:34+00:00): Minor Clean Up of Intersection nodes
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-03-17 04:42:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319611810 restored back your data on this way and its surrounding area