piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:41:46+00:00): 您好：

恭喜你完成第一筆編輯，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

一般來說不建議初次編輯的人使用較強大但也容易不小心出問題JOSM來編輯，請先熟悉網頁版的編輯器iD。使用JOSM時請對照OSM Wiki的文件，查詢能夠使用的標籤。

如果有什麼進階的資料想要放到OpenStreetMap上，請洽詢下面列出的溝通管道，與社群講你想做什麼。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群 Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
敬祝畫圖愉快！
trigpoint (2017-05-06 18:10:31+00:00): Hi, please remember that that name tag should only be used for actual names, not descriptions. I an object doesn't have a name then the tag should be left blank.
bikingaround244 (2022-08-26 06:16:10+00:00): Question how do you know bikes are not allowed in cemetery? I biked here today 08/24/2022 I saw no signs indicating bikes are not allowed.
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-12 22:19:30+00:00): Hi, A68 cannot be the name of way 66151603 - it is the ref. Can you please take another look at it and change as appropriate?

Thanks,
Mike
SK53 (2017-08-11 16:37:27+00:00): Just to let you know that I have removed the wikidata/wikipedia tags from two of the flagpoles you added here. Please reserve such tags only for the equivalent object (i.e., wikipedia=Malaysia only belongs on the country). If you want to provide the extra information prefix the tag with extra text. In particular these tags are used by Nominatim to adjudge which elements are important, so the flagpoles were getting undue prominence.
DiLeGreen (2017-05-14 12:54:14+00:00): Hi, das ist so IMHO nicht richtig. Die Straßen selbst sind bereits seit längerer Zeit fertiggestellt, teilweise inkl. Beschilderung. Dazu hast du auch noch die geplante Straba Linie mit erwischt. Bitte nochmal überdenken, ich würde vorschlagen es komplett rückgängig zu machen.
HS-Rook (2017-05-14 15:39:01+00:00): Tatsächlich sind die Straßen vorhanden. Allerdings sind sie definitiv nicht zugänglich. War erst die Tage dort und das ist alles hinter einem Bauzaun. Allerdings habe ich dann doch den "Baustellen tag" entfernt. Auch bei der Straba Linie. Die hört dort ja auch einfach auf. Nun, da hat der Bau auch noch nicht begonnen. Habe nun bei der Straße die Zugänglichkeit als "access - no" getagt. Stehe für weitere Vorschläge offen. ;)
HS-Rook (2017-05-14 15:55:23+00:00): Hab nochmal geschraubt und nun "access - private" getagt....
DiLeGreen (2017-05-14 16:44:03+00:00): Ja, "access - private" ist denke ich sinnvoll. Danke fürs korrigieren :)
Bzgl. Straba: Da ist glaube ich noch nicht mehr konkret festgelegt, das Stückchen ist glaube ich aus den Planungsunterlagen zur LGS. Das Planfeststellungsverfahren müsste aber demnächst abgeschlossen sein, dann gibts mehr konkrete Infos...
GerdP (2017-08-30 13:59:04+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=Khandor Bari Road
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445974567
Did you mean highway=residential + name=Khandor Bari Road ?
user_3216889 (2017-05-06 17:17:16+00:00): Rijstroken niet apart intekenen, maar lanes gebruiken.
Zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-12 22:51:58+00:00): Hi, there are a dozen or so ways that you have put foot=dedicated on. This is not a standard value. Did you intend foot=designated? 

Cheers,
Mike
zeusfaber (2017-05-12 23:05:12+00:00): Mike,
Good spot there.  I was having a go at using a phone app to edit while still out in the field that day, so was relying on memory for tags I normally get from JOSM's standard menus.  Will fix.
A.
zeusfaber (2017-05-12 23:13:47+00:00): Done now.  Thanks for pointing it out.  A,
Alexander-II (2017-06-02 22:02:52+00:00): В этой правке вы повесили на территорию тег building=yes. Что означает, что это здание. Что не похоже на правду (по снимкам видно, что такого здания нет).
user_3216889 (2017-05-06 17:09:20+00:00): Rijstroken niet apart intekenen, maar lanes gebruiken.
Zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
muralito (2017-05-06 21:54:10+00:00): Lucas, los combustibles que vende cada estacion tienen su propia etiqueta para describirlos, no van como parte del nombre. por ejemlpo fuel:cng=yes si vende GNC y fuel:cng=no en caso contrario.
0000FF berries (2017-05-07 22:27:28+00:00): hi :) While the key wood=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wood is indeed deprecated, natural=wood is still valid as far as I know :) (I'll copy this to the rest  changesets too, sorry for the spam :) )
CloCkWeRX (2017-10-06 06:37:40+00:00): You might be interested in improveosm.org, which has a lot of GPS traces for roads - you've managed to get to a few of them, but plenty more in the area :)
TheHammer (2017-10-06 07:30:41+00:00): Actually, ehm, this changeset was made via improveosm.org
mavl (2017-05-07 16:47:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. У аптеки указан только номер дома. Его можно не указывать (он есть на здании). К тому же микрорайон не указан для аптеки.
mavl (2017-05-07 16:49:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не указан микрорайон дома. Он хоть и входит в 7А, некоторые навигаторы могут его не найти.
trigpoint (2017-05-06 18:10:48+00:00): Hi, please remember that that name tag should only be used for actual names, not descriptions. I an object doesn't have a name then the tag should be left blank.
RoterEmil (2017-05-07 18:22:08+00:00): Hi, das Restaurant war bereits eingetragen (und zwar am richtigen Standort) mit all den Daten (und noch weiteren), die Du angegeben hast. Du findest ihn hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265286571. Deshalb habe ich Deinen Eintrag nun entfernt. Schöne Grüße :)
0000FF berries (2017-05-07 22:28:02+00:00): hi :) While the key wood=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wood is indeed deprecated, natural=wood is still valid as far as I know :) (I'll copy this to the rest  changesets too, sorry for the spam :) )
Sanniu (2017-07-01 07:41:26+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838858488 - should it be gate node on the trail? Also it will be good to add access restrictions here, if any.
literan (2017-05-09 13:42:35+00:00): и зачем вы мусор добавляете в карту? какая автобусная станция в болоте?
GinaroZ (2017-05-08 11:04:41+00:00): Hi, I assume you will connect these footpaths to the roads/other paths in the future? Because at the moment they are just an island
ABZ_OSM (2017-05-08 11:22:18+00:00): Yes I will. 
I am always wary about joining nodes of different type.
ad47 (2017-05-08 10:36:32+00:00): Откуда дровишки? Просто в большинстве оврагов Битцы ручьи можно обнаружить только ранней весной, а объект https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491805677 я вообще не смог вспомнить на местности, овраг там севернее.
Zverik (2017-05-08 11:36:58+00:00): Привет, про этот ручей написано в справочнике Насимовича: «в 260 м выше МКАД» (http://temnyjles.narod.ru/Reki3-21.htm — см. Комаровская речка). Сейчас я вижу, что выше обозначен овраг, действительно. Перенесу ручей туда.
ika-chan! (2017-05-12 11:11:33+00:00): Hi, I have replied to your idea about making greater use of trunk roads for Nation Roads by using E-Roads as the main criteria. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ika-chan!#May_2017_changes - and please, use comments for edits as major as this.
ika-chan! (2017-05-22 14:41:36+00:00): I should add that at a grade separated junction at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/39.58429/22.07242, should the slip roads leading directly from the trunk road be trunk_link?
Thomas8122 (2017-05-07 10:01:22+00:00): Kein Editor warnt bei Knoten, wenn die Richtung des Weges gedreht wird. Das ist genauso ein Blödsinn wie Kreuzungen mit bis zu acht Ampeln zu pflastern (4x Str./4x Fußgänger), wobei bei STOP-Schildern zumindest kein ordentliches Routing unterbunden wird.
scai (2017-05-07 10:41:04+00:00): Ich weiß dass Editoren bisher keine Unterstützung dafür haben. Ich bin aber der Meinung dass diese Information ein Mehrwert fürs Routing darstellt. Einerseits ist es hilfreich Stoppschilder während der Navigation anzuzeigen, OsmAnd macht das beispielsweise bereits. Andererseits wird die Routenberechnung besser wenn Stoppschilder gemieden bzw. eine Penalty vergeben werden kann. Dafür muss jedoch die Richtung bekannt sein.

Meine Bearbeitung macht jedenfalls nichts kaputt, ich habe nur Zusatzinformationen ergänzt. Wie sinnvoll die sind wird die Zeit zeigen :)
k1wi (2017-05-20 09:42:54+00:00): Reverted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48839318
mueschel (2017-05-13 13:00:50+00:00): Hi,
you put the key "gateway = yes" on this node - did you mean "barrier = gate"?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4838972161

Cheers, Jan
MichielSw (2017-05-06 19:17:00+00:00): Eggie /  HenkL; ik hoop dat ik de wijzigingen zo goed heb verwerkt (multipolygonen toegepast op zowel het eerder gemapte water als ook op nieuwe items).

Graag nog jullie advies op het volgende:

In het bos heb ik een plas toegevoegd (491809133) met hierover een brug. Dit zijn eigenlijk soort vaste steigers. Hoe kan ik die het beste taggen?
user_3216889 (2017-05-06 20:30:40+00:00): Prima werk, Michiel.
Steiger kun je aangeven als man_made=pier.
Een bospad is alleen track als het breed en 
'tweesporig' is. Anders gewoon path gebruiken, zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Nog een tip: doe niet te veel wijzigingen in één keer; beter het in kleinere brokjes te doen en te uploaden.
MichielSw (2017-05-08 08:08:05+00:00): Ik heb de steiger aangepast, en op een aantal plaatsen 'path' getagged. 

Ik zal de volgende keer als ik in gebied ben beter op de verschillende pad-types letten, en aan de hand daarvan nog opnieuw taggen.

Ook her en der al landuse ontkoppeld van de tracks - ik zal er voortaan direct op letten.
Martin Borsje (2017-05-10 13:26:37+00:00): Dankjewel! Het was mij eerlijk gezegd een beetje te veel werk....
eggie (2020-07-30 06:47:15+00:00): Dag rivw.

Het is al even geleden deze changeset.
Het zij allemaal mp's hier.. Dus geen landuse forest bv zetten op de outer mp zelf. De landuse hoort op de outerrelatie en die is heide.
Je ziet anders bos en heide door elkaar.
Ik heb al wat aangepast
maar zie veel meer van deze "fouten". 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109835494#map=17/52.87845/6.89230
MVG..
eggie
eggie (2020-07-30 06:48:57+00:00): Je eigen changeset https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48459738
eggie (2020-07-30 06:51:58+00:00): Maar wellicht heeft iemand anders er al overheen getekend.. Zie meer van die bossen liggen over heide en bos. 
heb dat allemaal verwijderd
MVG,
Eggie
*Martin* (2017-05-09 12:00:31+00:00): Na redundantne uzly ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4839042578 je vhodny SimplifyArea JOSM plugin ;-).
Polarbear (2018-10-11 07:04:29+00:00): Hi, da DEKRA und TÜV Autos nicht reparieren, sollte shop=car_repair entfernt werden.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-05-08 19:16:03+00:00): Hi Sir Lancelot, you entered an empty key to node/3115542081 . I changed it to seats. Please check. Thanks Alex
Supaplex (2017-10-21 18:52:56+00:00): I think it's not suitable to ad ISO3166-2 code when China's Taiwan definite and Taiwan's Taiwan definite is not the same.
Dalkvist (2017-05-11 09:04:19+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 

Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.
Helena Wottle (2017-05-14 12:33:48+00:00): Absolut!
Tack/Helena
RicoElectrico (2020-05-29 09:20:51+00:00): Cześć, sprawdziłbyś? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2210349
chillly (2017-05-07 09:32:41+00:00): Hi,
You have added a couple of living streets in Pocklington. These are vanishingly rare in the UK and as far as I know the East Riding council have not created any. It is usual to just use highway=residential in the UK, with surface, sidewalk and maxspeed tags to add more detail.

HTH
eggie (2017-05-07 07:04:12+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48461572
Er loopt nu bos door het water heen.
ik kijk er even naar.
'k Zie dat je nog geen 10 mappingdays hebt en weer begonnen bent met mappen. Daarom alnog een welkomstmail met nuttige links en tips.
Zie PB
eggie (2017-05-07 07:14:43+00:00): Bos en water gescheiden
Thomas8122 (2017-05-07 07:33:31+00:00): hier hast du dich irgendwie mit der Adresse vertan
Klumbumbus (2017-05-07 11:09:44+00:00): Hupps, danke für den Hinweis. Da hat wohl strg+C nicht geklappt und ich habe etwas altes aus der Zwischenablage eingefügt. Habs repariert.
VG
wbmstr (2017-05-07 16:56:02+00:00): warum löschst du einfach fläschen und gebäude?
elgolfo (2017-05-07 17:59:46+00:00): Weil der Kirchhof völlig ungenau gezeichnet war, als cemetery getaggt war und laut deines Edits bis an die Mitte der umliegenden Wege/Straßen angrenzte. Laut den Bing Luftbildern entspricht das nicht der Realität.
wbmstr (2017-05-07 16:55:05+00:00): was heißt da unplausibel?
elgolfo (2017-05-07 18:01:24+00:00): Selbe Begründung wie hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48461901
eggie (2017-05-07 07:22:06+00:00): Reinbaard.. probeer concreet te zijn in je commentaar.. bv added maxspeed
Sailor Steve (2017-07-14 12:02:29+00:00): This building has been demolished
RAytoun (2017-07-14 12:24:20+00:00): Again thank you for the local knowledge.
Sailor Steve (2017-07-14 11:51:25+00:00): This building has been demolished
RAytoun (2017-07-14 12:22:20+00:00): Thank you for that local knowledge. I was working from the Bing imagery. Have you removed the building?
Sailor Steve (2017-07-14 13:44:47+00:00): Hello Ray.  I've done all the changes needed to update the area.  I don't know when redevelopment is going to start, there were suggestions of a vehicle dealership and a fast food restaurant in the local press.  Regards, Steve
Sailor Steve (2017-07-14 12:02:06+00:00): This site is still awaiting development
RAytoun (2017-07-14 12:25:59+00:00): Are there any indications as to what may be built in this area?
maraf24 (2017-05-24 21:08:43+00:00): Reverted.
user_5359 (2017-05-07 10:45:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the name of the street: Beaham https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41740214 oder Beacham https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491829312 ?

And please add connection points on the place of crossing highways.
manoharuss (2017-06-14 06:28:58+00:00): Hi penom, 

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But the taxi point you added here with numbers in name seems unreasonable. It would be great if you can correct. Thank you.

Best,

Manohar
literan (2017-05-09 13:56:52+00:00): Здравствуйте! Не надо писать в name все подряд (например, "ворота"). Это тег для имен собственных, названий. Здесь вычищу.
proba-f (2017-05-09 13:58:56+00:00): У меня много таких ошибок. Спасибо, постараюсь впредь не.
literan (2017-05-09 14:19:14+00:00): если характеристика задана тегом (например 'ворота' это то же самое что barrier=gate), то текстом писать и не нужно ничего. Если нужно какое-то уточнение или описание текстом, его можно написать в тег description=.... Но приоритетом все равно являются теги (например, нужно не писать "калитка", а указать ширину width=1.0 + motorcar=no), т.к. маршрутизаторы, навигаторы понимают только их.
tonyf1 (2017-05-07 23:36:45+00:00): Etiqueta equivocada? ver http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=emergency%20access%20point?uselang=en-US

Wrong tag? see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=emergency%20access%20point?uselang=en-US
5m4u9 (2017-05-08 16:17:36+00:00): @tonyf1 no, Norman wants to map the entrance door to the emergency room, because many people can confuse where it is attended ... at the front door (6 august avenue) or on the service street

@norman dibujé el edificio posterior a la torre del hospital, seguro está mal o falta, si fuese así lo indicas...
5m4u9 (2017-05-07 05:47:02+00:00): revertí el cambio porque hubo un error involuntario de mala edición del edificio.
Norman Huasebe (2017-05-08 20:56:47+00:00): Si muchas gracias, error mío
BCNorwich (2017-05-07 06:48:59+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
For the bridleway there is a discrepancies between what is mapped in OSM and what appears on the Ordnance survey map. I think an on the ground survey is required. Even if the definitive line cannot be used it is still a highway.

For the gate again the same discrepancies between maps. I would suggest you might find the gated track is not a right of way (it may have actually been used as a bridleway though). Information on other maps show the not to be a bridleway here at the gate. There is shown a bridleway heading north from Epping Road about 400 feet to the west. Also a footpath about 300 feet to the east. An on the ground survey is needed before putting the ways on OSM

Regards  Bernard
LessExciting (2017-05-07 07:56:04+00:00): Thanks Bernard. In regards to the first change I haven't seen this on the ground but the connection between the bridleway and the track is visible on satellite so I'd thought I could extend it. 

The gate change I wasn't sure about. I've been on the ground there and the gate isn't really passable and therefore completely restricts access. I'm interested to know if something is listed as a bridleway on OS maps whether land owners are legally allowed to block access. In this case, there is a bridleway just west of the marked one. I have this as a gps track and am in the process of uploading this. Apologies if this sort of discussion should be held in forums rather than on changes. Thanks.
BCNorwich (2017-05-07 08:30:04+00:00): No problem glad to help. Essex has an interactive Public Right of way Map here :- http://www.essexhighways.org/Getting-Around/public-rights-of-way/prow-map.aspx . Lots of info on that page, I don't know if it is open data (if data can be directly copied to OSM) but it's certainly for use by the public. Your gated way then is not a PRoW. There is a similar map fot Hertfordshire but it won't open at the moment. Regards Bernard
catdreamer (2017-05-14 07:28:12+00:00): 用area=yes,名稱不會出來,也搜尋不到,不如標示在建物上
FraMauro (2017-05-10 09:59:04+00:00): Buongiorno e benvenuto in OpenStreetMap. Hai aggiunto un percorso privo di tag. 
Questo vuol dire che non si sa se la "linea" che hai aggiunto è un sentiero, un'autostrada, un muro, un fiume, ....
Ad esempio il percorso 74154960 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74154960#map=19/43.58208/11.65153&layers=D) a cui è attaccato il tuo ha i tag highway=footway e foot=yes.
Per informazioni sui tag consulta la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Pagina_Principale
FraMauro (2017-05-10 10:03:17+00:00): Buongiorno e benvenuto in OpenStreetMap. Hai aggiunto un percorso privo di tag. 
Questo vuol dire che non si sa se la "linea" che hai aggiunto è un sentiero, un'autostrada, un muro, un fiume, ....
Ad esempio il percorso 113570803 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113570803) a cui è attaccato il tuo ha il tag highway=residential.
Per informazioni sui tag consulta la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Pagina_Principale
Hjart (2017-05-07 05:20:53+00:00): Husk når du opretter nye rundkørsler, at tagge dem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
Kai Johnson (2023-02-26 15:18:04+00:00): It seems like this might be a misplaced duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150965543. I know it's a long time ago, but do you happen to recall the source for the location of this node for Jamacha?
stevea (2023-02-26 20:25:04+00:00): I don't recall "exactly" although the answer is partly from my childhood a half-century ago.  Dropping a pin on a nearly blank placemat was a bit difficult even six years ago, it was "sparse" here.

Because it was a rough guess, I'd agree with you if it were to move SSW by ~425 meters.  That makes it sort of vague and around the power lines and diagonals.  It's vague now in my mind and if you think it wanders to somewhere else, well, please march it forward to a better place.

You don't have to answer this, but why wouldn't my suggested location be better?  (And I get it, this needs a more accurate location).

Maybe it "looks nicer" if it is centered just south of the intersection of Lisbon and Woodrow, where Keiller Park playground area is nearby.

So, if you'd like to fix things as adjustments, go for it.  Better, newer knowledge / data are best.
stevea (2023-02-26 20:41:51+00:00): The fact that Meadowbrook connects to Skyline is how "Jamacha" ties together in my mind.  So, from Meadowbrook Drive (as the connection to Skyline, to knit together south) "further West" on Jamacha Road, past its terminus named that, onto Lisbon Street for that westerly bit that you care connected to the park and school, yeah, that's a nugget called Jamacha, I believe.

The residential area to the north and east (Woodrow, Canton, Montgomery Heights Elementary, up to edges of Lemon Grove, certainly.  Where a Jamacha node is "best centered" is tricky.  You might pull it a bit east towards Cardiff.  I'm not a historian, rather a mapper who grew up near here.

In my mind this is a "I'd ask somebody who goes to Mount Miguel to best say where Jamacha actually is."  If you want to "center the push-pin node" yeah.

I can see this being a wobbler of sorts.
Kai Johnson (2023-02-26 21:29:27+00:00): I came across this because I was looking more closely at Jamacha, and strangely, the GNIS record for Jamacho (https://edits.nationalmap.gov/apps/gaz-domestic/public/summary/243992), and I just happened to come across this node.

The location for the other Jamacha (n150965543) is at the exact coords specified in GNIS and matches the placement of the name in historical USGS Topo maps. Which is not to say that the location is "right," just that there's a source for those coords.

When I saw this node, I wondered if there was a residential area or something nearby with signage that said "Jamacha" but didn't find anything on street-level imagery.
Kai Johnson (2023-02-26 21:33:21+00:00): If you know some of the history of the area, I wonder what you might make of the name "Jamacho," which is in GNIS and present on old USGS Topo maps. Maybe it's a USGS typo (or alternate spelling) that we've kept around for 60 years?