piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-16 11:22:33+00:00): note: you added some image tags linking to image from StreetComplete notes (for example in this changeset)

Sadly this images are not permanent and are scheduled to be deleted shortly after note is closed, and were never intended for long-term archiving.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#Are_the_pictures_taken_with_StreetComplete_permanent%3F for details.

You can use http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nOD to find remaining links in image tag, including what you added to OSM objects.

If you want to do something with them some may be still retrievable.

All such links are scheduled for removal (broken ones were already removed)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-19 22:23:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103224740 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more childish vandalism mainly. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4939 for latest block.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-19 22:23:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103224740 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more childish vandalism mainly. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4939 for latest block.
user_5359 (2021-04-22 04:23:57+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys. See https://www.osm.org/way/932648314 as example!
iandees (2021-04-19 22:16:00+00:00): Thanks for making this contribution. It looks like the Ramsey County mapping website agrees with you, too. I map this area often, so please feel free to ask questions. Keep up the good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103224161
rthik007 (2021-04-20 03:00:01+00:00): Hi atinyrock,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road .Kindly check with way 30911408.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103229718
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103224453
PolyDunami (2021-04-19 22:17:55+00:00): Bing has published more recent imagery for the city of Surrey.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-19 22:22:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-19 22:23:33+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 103223770, 103223870.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-19 22:49:19+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102750571, 102750716, 102750962, 102751770, 102752426.
user_7581226 (2021-04-21 20:29:49+00:00): Hallo cxs,
mir ist aufgefallen dass Du die Funktion Linen Vereinfachung anwendest. Zuletzt hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68444945 Es gibt nun Mitwirkende die sich in Ihrer Freizeit ehrenamtlich und unentgeltlich bemühen dass OpenStreetMap besser wird. Du gehst aber nun her und machst deren Arbeit mit wenigen Klicks wieder zunichte. Ist das nicht irgendwie unfair. 
Möglicherweise verlieren Freiwillige über Deine Vereinfachungen die Motivation weiter an OpenStretMap mitzuwirken. Daher meine Frage wie begründest Du deine Vorgangsweise. Grüße
woodpeck (2021-04-23 23:34:09+00:00): Der oben zitierte Way hatte vor der Bearbeitung 28 Punkte und nach der Bearbeitung 34 Punkte. Wäre tatsächlich die Funktion "Linien vereinfachen" angewendet worden, so hätte sich m.E. die Anzahl der Punkte verringern und nicht erhöhen müssen. @cxs, hast Du dazu einen Kommentar? Hat beautifulplaces2020 sich nur bei diesem einen Weg geirrt, und an anderen Stellen hast Du Linien vereinfacht?
user_7581226 (2021-04-25 14:19:05+00:00): Neben dem bereits genannten way 68444945 ID, die Node Reduktion durch cxs als Bild: https://i.imgur.com/e9A5mfA.png
BCNorwich (2021-04-20 07:04:03+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think Meducate occupies the whole of the building as you indicated by tagging the large building. I've drawn in what looks like a separate section to the north end and placed the Meducate tags on it. If this is incorrect please amend it or let me know. I also amended the address tagging to suit OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-19 23:10:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102732281, 102732361, 102733069, 102733664.
user_11418917 (2021-04-20 02:28:48+00:00): Thank you. keep up the good work
Jarek 🚲 (2021-06-21 14:28:28+00:00): Hello,

Could you confirm is this edit added a trail/path that exists on the ground, or if it is a route you took across the terrain?

A note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2722573 was opened about the path, can you comment?

Thanks!
--Jarek
LabradorWildMan (2021-06-21 18:36:04+00:00): I have to deleat the trail but i know there is a mark trail up two mountains so i will leave them
Josef73 (2022-03-26 11:51:07+00:00): Hello, can you check the value of the tag opening_hours for : Melhus Auto Service (3117162591, v2)
Showzkyy (2022-05-08 23:13:10+00:00): Opening_Hours for: Melhus auto service are correct
Josef73 (2024-01-31 20:10:04+00:00): Can you tell what day is MA?
anderfo (2024-02-08 09:04:39+00:00): Ma is an unusual abbreviation for Monday ("Mandag" in Norwegian). 
So "Ma-Fri" is a weird mixture of languages (Ma from Norwegian and Fri from English). 
I believe it should say Mo-Fr.
anderfo (2024-02-08 09:06:34+00:00): I solved it.
RussNelson (2021-04-22 21:20:03+00:00): Can you elaborate on "various fixes"?
rimezin (2021-04-23 09:43:45+00:00): I updated many things in the Waterloo area, anything from adjusting roads/paths, parking lots, fixing building alignments, etc.
RussNelson (2021-04-23 13:42:03+00:00): In this specific changeset, though, it looks like you deleted part of the Seneca Falls Branch. I understand that parts of it may be hard to see, but there are parts which are not, and there is a bridge next to 77 East River Street.
rimezin (2021-04-25 11:32:23+00:00): Are you referring to an old railroad that doesn't exist? Or a footpath? Hard to remember but I'm happy to make any corrections as needed
rimezin (2021-04-25 11:38:55+00:00): After a closer look, I see now what you mean now about the old railroad down by river road - it does appear to be obscured by trees. However I don't see on satelite where the railroad you have remarked goes through homes and other buildings... Can you elaborate on this?
user_11418917 (2021-04-20 02:47:03+00:00): Duplicated point. this point has been deleted. please check first before adding new things. thank you.
mueschel (2021-04-25 09:18:22+00:00): Hi,
"recycling:sewage_oil" doesn't exist as a key yet. What kind of oil can be recycled here? cooking oil, motor oil?
frasty (2021-04-25 10:26:42+00:00): Hi,
yes, indeed I meant cooking oil,
I wonder why I wrote sewage_oil, maybe I was thinking about something else! Thank you for reporting
portalaventura (2021-04-20 00:56:40+00:00): Boas-vindas joaovictornm, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
portalaventura (2021-04-20 01:08:33+00:00): Boas-vindas Guiatsu, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
tomhukins (2023-07-17 12:56:57+00:00): Thank you for improving the map.

This change adds https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8645541477 tagged as amenity=bus_station, but it looks more like a depot=bus.

Also it looks like it's a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41184797 so it might be worth deleting the node, copying relevant tags onto the way and fixing the tags to use landuse=industrial, industrial=depot, and depot=bus.

Does this seem correct to you?
ZenPhil (2023-07-17 13:44:00+00:00): agreed, thanks Tom, I have made the edits as you suggested
woodpeck (2021-04-20 08:49:40+00:00): The buildings you have added in this changeset are not well drawn. The editor supports a method to make rectangular buildings. Please try to use that in the future.
woodpeck (2021-04-20 08:46:57+00:00): In this changeset you have added a motorway in the middle of a forest. This is wrong. Please correct your mistake.
portalaventura (2021-04-20 01:31:33+00:00): Boas-vindas mrafaelr, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
portalaventura (2021-04-20 01:36:50+00:00): Boas-vindas DHEYSSON LIMA, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
kevinchen1 (2021-04-20 03:09:43+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1721072
skquinn (2021-04-20 03:59:55+00:00): This changeset addresses the main concern in note 2613111.
user_5359 (2021-04-21 04:44:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I am sorry, but I must remove your entry, because you copy the data from google (this isn't allowed).
By the way I don't believe your entry as hospital.
user_11418917 (2021-05-07 16:03:25+00:00): Dear @SerraDeCollserola,              
 You edited the coast line and expanded it. but it's not soil to walk or stand. it's shallow water, small boats can still navigate and sail on it.              
Please fix it and revert ASAP. thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103233480
SerraDeCollserola (2021-05-10 11:59:09+00:00): Hi lockdownguy, thanks for the feedback on this area. I looked at this area again and can see your point! I actually think this may be a tidalflat (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland%3Dtidalflat). Do you think I should pull the coastline further inland to around where the straight dug-out canals exist for aquaculture? I can then add a wetland to where the coastline alignment is currently mapped to show that detail as well. Happy to hear your thoughts on this, thanks!
user_11418917 (2021-05-12 03:10:57+00:00): @SerraDeCollserola I honestly don't know. But just imagine like if you were a sailor and using this map. What would help you sailing in? this is my whole point. do whatever you see is good for this thing. but definitely not a hard land when small boats can still float on that water.
SerraDeCollserola (2021-05-13 12:21:35+00:00): Hi lockdownguy, I have made the changes, Thank you!
user_11418917 (2021-05-15 02:05:34+00:00): @SerraDeCollserola  perfect! your edit with the tag is good! now the small boats who exit from Bahmanshir river can go straight into the Shatt Al Arab river or the other way around easily with this map going directly throw the land you edited. Thanks, and always keep up the good work.
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-06-07 16:11:39+00:00): Hi Grace,

this changeset is bogus. Your supervisor is irresponsible when letting you map.
Dimacn (2021-04-20 10:54:23+00:00): 1. Пожалуйста верните на здание тег building=yes который вы зачем то удалили. 2. Ваш "маркет" нужно было добавить отдельной точкой а не на контур здания. Т.к. это многоэтажный жилой дом, у таких домов нет названий. Пожалуйста исправьте.
Dimacn (2021-04-27 15:08:36+00:00): Я исправил сам
tordans (2021-04-20 04:52:55+00:00): Interessant. Grundsätzlich hat Komoot IMO mit den Stufen + Brücken Tags schon genug Informationen um zu wissen, dass man hier nicht fahren kann (also schieben muss). Mal sehen, ob es jetzt besser wird im Routing :-). Schreib gerne später nochmal. VG
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103234650
StefanHRT (2021-04-20 05:29:47+00:00): Die Treppen waren auf bicycle=yes, vielleicht auch deswegen. Hatte am Wochenende schon das "Glück" mit dem Routing da lang und heute früh wieder. Hatte letztens supaplex schon meine Erfahrungen mit den nicht definierten Fußwegen und Komoot geschildert, vielleicht ergibt sich heute Abend auch die Gelegenheit, dazu was zu sagen ;) VG
StefanHRT (2021-04-21 17:31:54+00:00): Hallo tordans, Zur Info. Graphhopper und OSRM machen schon einmal ein wesentlich besseres Routing ohne die Brücke, Komoot wird noch ein paar Tage brauchen. VG
dzamper (2021-04-21 12:14:16+00:00): Zamiast railway=tram powinno być raczej tram=yes ;)
C2oc4 (2021-05-02 10:08:00+00:00): takie coś ?
dzamper (2021-05-02 10:17:27+00:00): Jest OK
C2oc4 (2021-05-17 06:29:27+00:00): dziękuje
InsertUser (2021-04-21 01:26:58+00:00): That link references Vietnam. This changeset seems a little larger?
abakus_uploader (2021-04-20 22:32:14+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-28 09:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103762426, 103761111 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy imports by user noName12
literan (2021-04-20 16:55:15+00:00): Добрый день! точки заведений ставятся в месте их истинного расположения в здании. Так что притягивание их к входу -скорее всего, ухудшение качества информации
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-28 09:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103762426, 103761111 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy imports by user noName12
SomeoneElse (2021-06-10 22:31:16+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the OSM's Data Working Group here.
I'm currently trying to repair the road merge problems described at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html and noticed that the tags on http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=79636644 seem implausible. "lanes=4;2;3" has clearly been merged from several previous ways. Please check the historical data using overpass when you see tags like this.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_12717213 (2021-06-11 06:19:07+00:00): Hello Andy,

Trust you are safe & healthy !!

Thank you for your valuable feedback. Since I have only created missing service roads leading to the gas stations and hold no edits to any existing date or historical data with Trunk road no tags were either modified or added on that. However, i shall follow the feedback provided in using overpass to review historical data moving forward. Thank you.

Happy Mapping.

Regards,
Bolt021
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-28 09:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103762426, 103761111 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy imports by user noName12
ScottWalkerAU (2021-04-20 08:43:29+00:00): Did the guidance on needing footways inside pedestrian areas change to be no longer required?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103239500
Reemuson (2021-04-20 12:55:15+00:00): Checking, I don't think it's changed and it appears to be recommended/required. 

It was an oversight on my part because I didn't have the patience to draw ways inside it as well as not fully having enough survey data to path the details. 

I'll be going back to survey again with more thorough GPX traces and will add them in soon.
Reemuson (2021-04-21 10:13:49+00:00): Should be sorted now.
Geim (2021-05-13 15:33:13+00:00): Wijziging gedeeltelijk ongedaan gemaakt, zie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2667331
pesec (2021-04-20 10:59:31+00:00): Добрый день.
Для обозначения назначения встроенных помещений не нужно указывать контур внутри здания, тем более, что он не соответствует действительности.
Указывайте точку с необходимыми тэгами внутри здания и обозначайте вход.
mavl (2021-04-21 17:01:54+00:00): Здравствуйте, Alex24555.  
Этот пакет правок добавляет супермаркет, находящийся в жилом доме.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8646176455  
  
С точки зрения OpenStreetMap супермаркет это не столько магазин, в котором можно самостоятельно складывать товары в корзинки или тележки, а большой магазин (часто располагается в отдельном большом здании или в торговом центре). Я не был конкретно в этом магазине "Абсолют", так что выбор тега за вами, но те "Абсолюты" в Тюмени, в которых я был - обычные shop=convenience.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dconvenience
mavl (2021-04-21 17:02:31+00:00): Забыл ссылку про супермаркет.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket
Dimacn (2021-04-20 11:11:58+00:00): Пожалуйста, изучите сначала что и как обозначать в OSM прежде чем делать изменения - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Заглавная_страница . Простите, но ваша правка выглядит очень неправильно и с массой ошибок.
toorboalex (2021-11-07 12:40:43+00:00): Добрый день!
Подскажите, откуда взяты данные об отмеченном Вами на карте парке имени Ф. М. Достоевского и кафе Озерное? Проезжаю почти ежедневно мимо данногоместа и что-то ничего подобного на местности не вижу...
canfe (2021-04-20 12:26:25+00:00): Secondo me non è website bensì url dato che non è un sito internet sulla sezione ma solo un unica pagina (url) a descrivere il tutto.
andgiors (2021-04-20 13:14:31+00:00): ok grazie, lo elimino
canfe (2021-04-20 17:29:07+00:00): No, no metterei come tag "url".
vedere wiki in merito.
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-28 09:35:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103762426, 103761111 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy imports by user noName12
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-28 09:35:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103762426, 103761111 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy imports by user noName12
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-04-20 07:21:56+00:00): I've added a new main road based on the update from maxar premium imagery. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Mavpa_z_mapoiu (2021-04-20 07:08:14+00:00): https://ul.waze.com/ul?ll=49.98784209%2C36.24563456&navigate=yes&zoom=17&utm_campaign=default&utm_source=waze_website&utm_medium=lm_share_location
eggie (2021-04-20 09:16:58+00:00): Dag Mike   Aan de zuidkant liggen twee wegen op elkaar.
Dat heet duplicayed way tagging
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-20 09:39:40+00:00): Er lagen hier drie wegen (living_street)  op elkaar.
Die heb ik verwijderd.
Je tagt maxspeed 30 op een woonerf.
Dat is niet correct.
Dat zal dan (wettelijk) 15 'moeten' zijn.
Wanneer het geen woonertven zijn maar residential dan kan 30 natuurlijk wel.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
*Martin* (2021-04-20 10:58:07+00:00): aka bola opekacka? ;-)
Vinber-Pro (2021-04-27 15:54:42+00:00): Bonjour,
et bienvenue dans OSM.
Vous avez ajouté une table d'orientation au milieu de la route, à décaler à l'endroit précis svp : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8646356717#map=19/43.33538/-1.42561&layers=N
bonne journée
PS : vous semblez contribuer dans le cadre de l'otpb, peut-être voir avec Stéphanie svp !

Je vais un peu remonter vos diverses contributions, mais attention quand je vois celle sur la randonnée il me semble qu'il ne faut pas se jeter trop vite dans OSM et des choses parfois complexes à apprendre, en prenant le temps !
Vincent
vorpalblade (2021-04-23 01:06:21+00:00): Just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite".

JOSM also has access to the 2019 and 2020 aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS".

Thanks for your contributions,
vorpalblade
Supaplex (2021-04-20 09:06:09+00:00): 請問刪除一排樹的依據是什麼?已經不存在了嗎?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103246310
gendy54 (2021-06-13 20:15:55+00:00): Bonsoir,

Y a un pb avec les multipolygones. Y a de la flotte dans la forêt.

Donat
DF45 (2021-06-13 21:41:17+00:00): Merci Donat,

C'est un résidu de découpage des méga polygones de Corine Landcover.
J'espère y arriver du premier coup.

Cordialement,

Daniel
user_2066394 (2021-04-20 10:40:04+00:00): Den Umriss hätte ich gleich beibehalten
eggie (2021-04-20 09:00:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-20 09:07:50+00:00): Meestal heeft het weinig zin om gebouwen van vorm te veranderen in OSM. Alles is (periodieke)  import vanuit de BSG (Kadaster)
Wanneer iet niet klopt kun je het doorgeven via deze site middels een terugmelding.. Overkappingen / carports staan nooit in de BAG. 
Die kun je apart oevoegen met buiding=roof
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=erlicum%205%20erp&resultOffset=0&objectId=0860100002502125&geometry.x=170178.48799743&geometry.y=400992.74399978&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0860010000015857

Ik heb het gebouw uitgelijnd volgens de laatste BAG data.
MVG
eggie