piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2019-04-23 14:49:07+00:00): Hi pe1klc.  I check tasks before validating them and noticed your mappings of highway=unclassified. Please review your knowledge of the highways here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
The tag path should be preferred here.
Best regards and keep mapping
skorasaurus (2019-04-14 17:21:29+00:00): great job.
viloan (2019-04-09 18:05:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Allison P (2019-04-10 17:00:38+00:00): The is_in tag is deprecated due to most countries having boundary polygons. I removed those tags for this reason. While I can't stop you from adding them back, I wanted to let you know.
mbe57 (2019-04-10 20:37:16+00:00): Well, the OSM database speaks differently. And in my work, I deal with nearly 200 countries ...

is_in:country

Das Tag is_in wird verwendet, um anzugeben, in welchem Staat sich eine Stadt befindet.
Filter:
Kein Filter
Vergleichsliste (0 Einträge)
XAPI JOSM Level0 Editor Overpass turbo

    Übersicht
    Values
    Kombinationen
    Ähnlich
    Karte
    Wiki
    Projekte

Aufteilung der Values
United States of AmericaKuwaitIndonesiaSpainNigeriaIranEspañaUSA
(other)
Übersicht
Typ
	
Anzahl Objekte
	
Anzahl Values
[Alle] Alle
	
797 853
0.01%
	
512
[Node] Node
	
557 512
0.39%
	
400
[Way] Way
	
199 383
0.03%
	
241
[Relation] Relation
	
40 958
0.61%
	
227
Allison P (2019-04-10 20:50:27+00:00): I understand that the tag is still used on hundreds of thousands of nodes and ways. There are likely some countries where is_in still has some use, but seeing as how the country, state, county, and city borders are already mapped, there is no need, mapping applications are able to determine those, making the tag redundant. JOSM recommends removing the tag now, though this is a very recent decision. I was using JOSM so I figured to remove it.
viloan (2019-04-09 18:07:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-04-09 18:10:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
narceliodesa (2019-04-09 20:53:35+00:00): Olá Danilo, verifique o traçado dessa via que tu mapeou como PADETEC, o traçado está esquisito. Essa via precisa ter nome, portanto pode remover o name=PADETEC. A localização dos escritórios está correta?
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-09 20:51:52+00:00): If you care about rendering on openstreetmap-carto, you can do railway=platform instead of railway=tram_stop on the public_transport=platform to get a platform rendered and no two stop markers. I don't think it's a firm requirement, so only if you choose, but it might make sense particularly for the RoW lines.
Nate Wessel (2019-04-10 13:31:17+00:00): Yep, looks like that is the more correct tagging. I had been thinking that tram_stop was for the platform area by analogy with highway=bus_stop. It seems though that railway=tram_stop should be tagged the same way (indeed coincident with) public_transport=stop_position.

Thanks for the tip!
Nate Wessel (2019-04-10 13:37:16+00:00): Related thought: where do tags about shelters, wheelchair access, departure boards, etc belong? I've been adding them to platforms since that is where things physically are, but I see you've added some to the stop positions, at least where the platforms aren't mapped yet. 

Should I transfer tags from those?
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-10 13:59:20+00:00): So, checking the wiki pages https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform it is pretty clear that shelter, departures_board, etc are recommended on the platform. I had not actually realized that, so I might have mistagged a few. I think it might also have been that I re-purposed the tram_stop node as the stop_position, so it kept the shelter tags it had.

Double checking I see some stops where I put shelter and wheelchair tags on both stop_position and platform, like https://osm.org/relation/9465080. I don't think the duplication hurts much (only thing would be potential for error if the shelter is removed and the tag is changed on one but not the other) so might as well tag on both?

But thanks for noticing, I hadn't realized and hadn't thought about it much. Will adapt going forward.

What do you think of a project to make the 510 relations fully PTv2 - with one relation per direction and full tagging? I've been thinking of trying to do a comprehensive Spadina update for that - the tracks are all split and stops seem well mapped only needing some platforms (and possibly double-checking announced names at Queens Quay and Spadina intersection). Having a route as PTv2 would give us "final" validation that the tagging we've been using works.
Nate Wessel (2019-04-10 14:29:47+00:00): I'm all for it. This wouldn't be the first PTV2 route in the city, but it would definitely be the most detailed.

A couple related points: 
I noticed there are three relations for the 510: A,B, and C. I only see A and B on the official map though. Is C real?

It seems like all the wheelchair tags related to this route are wheelchair=limited. Do you think this can be updated with the full deployment of the new streetcars? Or am I missing some other access limitation?
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-10 14:42:03+00:00): Individual schedules http://www.ttc.ca/Schedule/schedule.jsp?Route=510S&Stop=s.b._on_Spadina_Ave_at_Dundas_St_West_South_Side have only a few 510C runs in the evening turning back at King. I don't know if they actually run like that, could camp out at King and Spadina in the evening one day and check. But until they actually fully drop the 510C King designation we can probably keep it.

The wheelchair=limited might be left over from the initial roll-out, for example at Nassau https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/393549550/history it was added in September 2014 and not changed since. TTC shows the route and every stop as accessible so I think it's pretty safe to upgrade to wheelchair=yes. If you want to double-check in survey, check for the blue wheelchair symbols on stop poles.
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-13 03:32:05+00:00): About the 510C, I passed by the Oxley @ Charlotte stop that it should be using (will be updating that area shortly) and the streetcar stop sign there says:

"September to June: No evening service Monday to Friday, no late evening service Saturday, Sunday or holidays. June to September: AM rush hours only Monday to Friday"

It doesn't exactly match well with the schedules posted on TTC website, and the schedules on the website make more sense in that TTC might want to keep 510s making turns out of the way of 504 cars especially during rush hours and frankly the extra run to Queens Quay probably doesn't take that much time but helps people at Cityplace. But that's the sign.
azakh-world (2019-04-10 11:42:57+00:00): Please, do not create duplicates of objects. Objects https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3148750837
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680443650
represent the same feature, only one must be retained.
canfe (2019-04-10 04:26:48+00:00): Hai dato alla zona industriale il nome "via Stura".
Penso sia un altro il nome se esiste.
Max Peverada (2019-04-10 05:02:51+00:00): Non mi sembrava di averlo cambiato. Puoi ripristinare quello vecchio? Invece il nome della via attorno alla zona industriale di destra è via Stura perchè c'e' un cartello ad uno degli imbocchi e poi ho verificato l'indirizzo di aclune delle aziende (prima era indicata come Pec Koala). Ciao e grazie.
Max Peverada (2019-04-10 08:55:45+00:00): Ho cancellato il nome.Ciao
canfe (2019-04-11 06:51:38+00:00): Mi sembra a posto ora.
viloan (2019-04-09 18:38:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-04-19 15:41:11+00:00): Hi,
you added several hydrants with a strange tag: "SPV = 15". What does this mean?

Thanks
Jan
Marwis00 (2019-09-30 09:14:51+00:00): Zespół Elektrowni Wiatrowych z Masłowicach- nie za duża ta moc farmy?
Z 3 dużych wiatraków  powinno być trochę ponad 6 MW
BeKri (2019-04-19 21:47:11+00:00): Servus,
is ja noch recht frisch ...
Mit Liskauer Weg oder Am Liskauer Weg gibt es Differenzen, was stimmt jetzt ?
Und ist das für 2-12 wirklich nur der Stummelweg ???
https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/map#18/51.54046/14.62129/osm-wrongcity-minimalmissing-wrongstreet-wronghousenumber-outsideplz-falsepositive-dupes-errorbinoverlay

Gruss derBeKri
kirsch53 (2019-04-20 18:29:47+00:00): Mit dieser etwas unorthodoxen Nummerierung hat nicht nur OSMsuspects, sondern auch manchmal die Post Probleme.
Von der "Dorfstraße" zweigt der "Lieskauer Weg" als Sackgasse ab. Die Hausnummern 2-12 liegen in der Nähe des Lieskauer Weges. So hat sich nach der Erschliessung des Baugebietes wohl ein ganz Kluger gedacht: nennen wir die "Am Lieskauer Weg xx".
Und so steht das auch im Telefonbuch:
https://www.dasoertliche.de/Themen/Am-Lieskauer-Weg/Gablenz.htm

Ostergrüße von kirsch53
L'imaginaire (2019-04-10 05:39:08+00:00): Not clear to me why you deleted this node. The name tag contained more than the name and an office=yes tag was missing, but for the rest, the information that you deleted should be welcome in OSM in my opinion.
opendcc (2019-04-09 18:56:19+00:00): Hallo,

ist nur die Brücke Baustelle oder die ganze Straße? Letztens sah die Straße noch passierbar aus ..

Servus Wolfgang
HarryO66 (2019-04-09 19:12:10+00:00): Lt. Beschilderung ist alles Baustelle, Straße ist gesperrt und es stehen da auch oft Baufahrzeuge. War bis dato mein Arbeitsweg. 
Gruß Harry
Klioda (2019-04-11 20:44:42+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Это проверенная информация о том, что это не Полевая улица, а переулок Строителей?
Dmitry0918 (2019-04-12 15:11:40+00:00): Руководствовался схемой расположения пожарных гидрантов Жлобинского РОЧС МЧС
Klioda (2019-06-11 10:39:19+00:00): Тогда int_name стоит тоже поменять, а то в тегах одной дороги получились два разных названия).
eggie (2019-04-09 19:44:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

gebouwen zijn allemaal import vanuit het kadaster en als zodanig ingemeten. (meestal)  Beter daarom niets aan gebouwen veranderen. Ook niet de source=BAG weghalen. Die is nodig voor periodieke updates. Adresgegevens horen niet op gebouwen. Die bevinden zich op de adresnodes. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-09 19:55:12+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #69060229
eggie (2019-04-09 20:00:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Wat was hier je bedoeling precies. 
Alles wat je probeert komt ook werkelijk op de wereldkaart.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-04-09 20:09:23+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #69060664
eggie (2019-04-09 20:51:55+00:00): PB contact
viloan (2019-04-09 19:15:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
aceman444 (2019-04-29 12:11:34+00:00): Tak toto som vobec nepochopil. Umele rozdelenie ciest cez parkovisko, bicycle:practical=yes na ceste, kde su bicykle asi bezne povolene, dost zbytocna way 682762729...
dusoft (2019-04-29 12:16:29+00:00): Skuste si tam zajst na bicykli a zistite, ze toto je jediny sposob, ako tadial pouzitelne prejst.

BTW, ak mate zaujem, piste mi naraz, nie k jednotlivym changesetom, ja si vzhladom na spam z OSM davam uz unsubscribe komplet.
aceman444 (2019-04-29 12:24:02+00:00): Zial, neviem Vam pisat naraz, ked tie veci nachadzam postupne a nahodou. A myslim, ze pisat do changesetov je uplne spravne, tam kde ta zmena je, nech vieme o com hovorime a tiez nech je verejne zdokumentovane zdovodnenie tych zmien.

Ako sme si uz povedali, bicycle:practical Vam prejazd bicyklom nijako nezlepsi a ak tam v realite prejad bicyklom nie je "pouzitelny" tak to zial v OSM nevyriesime fiktivnymi znackami.

Ak nebudete prijimat a reagovat na pripomienky z OSM tak mozete byt zablokovany, kedze Vase zmeny su sporne a nebudete poskytovat vysvetlenia.
aceman444 (2019-04-29 12:25:35+00:00): A neviem aky spam z OSM dostavate, osm.org ziadne reklamne spravy neposiela, len ked Vam napise iny pouzivatel.
dusoft (2019-04-29 17:58:45+00:00): V poriadku, ale neocakavajte, ze budem reagovat na kazdy komentar, staci, ze cas venujem na zlepsovanie kvality map.
ligfietser (2019-04-11 09:54:13+00:00): @Jilles, gebruik geen highway=cycleway maar highway=proposed voor nog niet aangelegde wegen die alleen nog maar op papier bestaan. Ik heb het aangepast.
Jillis inactivE (2019-04-11 12:34:00+00:00): Bedankt ligfietser, ik moet nog een keer alle voorschriften lezen. Ik map vooral voor Missing Maps, dat is wat meer recht-toe-recht-aan.
BikePC (2019-04-11 20:22:37+00:00): Mapper onjvo tekent ook zaken die ik had verwijderd weer klakkeloos zonder survey in op OSM al zijn ze recent gewijzigd en de PDOK luchtfoto dus niet meer klopt. Ik heb comment gegeven op zijn changesets.
eggie (2019-04-11 20:39:14+00:00): Thanks BikePC.... De oprit naar de A12 is al weer gefatsoeneerd door A67
Z'n intenties zullen wel goed zijn, maar aan de communicatie schort het nog. 
Ook door kennis wordt hij niet gehinderd.
Echte reacties krijg ik helaas niet

Even in de gaten houden dus, want de routering gaat zo spaak lopen op veel plaatsen.
HG Eggie
StephaneP (2019-04-23 15:59:16+00:00): Bonjour GeorgeKaplan,

J'ai vu que tu avais supprimé pas mal de tags cycleway=no sur les voies du domaine de Saint-Cloud. Est-ce qu'il y a une raison particulière à ça ? Parce que je pense que c'est une information intéressante, non ?

A bientôt
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
eggie (2019-04-09 19:47:15+00:00): Dan nogmaals een keer. Niets aan gebouwen veranderen . Luchtfoto's vertekenene. het is allemaal ingemeten door het kadaster en geïmporteerd.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-09 19:50:21+00:00): Zelfs van de schaduw van de woningen maak je gebouwen. Ik draai beide changesets terug. 
..en herstel daarmee de data van het Kadaster.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-09 19:54:46+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #69060215
eggie (2019-04-09 19:59:00+00:00): mini_roundabout teruggezet.. Dat was uiteraard wel goed.
freakyuser (2019-11-29 16:24:31+00:00): Hey, hast du die Gebäude rein vom Satellit abgezeichnet? Einige sind schon lange abgerissen.
Geofreund1 (2019-11-29 20:07:27+00:00): Wie du sicher weißt, gibt es keine tagesaktuellen Satellitenbilder, irgendwie schon schade. Wenn du also Gebäude entdeckst, die es nicht mehr gibt, so lösche diese bitte. Bitte aber nicht vergessen, eine Kennzeichnung wie z.B. demolished anzubringen. Danke
freakyuser (2019-11-29 21:26:16+00:00): Mit genügend Kleingeld bekommt man die sicherlich :D

Danke für den Hinweis zur Kennzeichnung! Sicherlich eine gute Idee.
PT-53 (2019-04-10 08:01:29+00:00): Hallo  TS89000,
schau Dir mal auf dieser Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions das 10. Beispiel für zeitliche Beschränkungen an bestimmten Wochentagen an. (overtaking:hgv:conditional=no @ (Mo-Fr 06:00-19:00))
Grüße
Greg_Rose (2019-04-09 20:13:09+00:00): You did fine for a first edit! I put barriers at the end of the destroyed roads to make it clear that the road is actually destroyed
Russ McD (2022-12-03 12:12:23+00:00): Why have you Kaart mappers changed the status of a number of link roads (U-turns) from the correctly tagged parent highway, to that of the connecting road.
The Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link   clearly says not to do this.  Adding the road from new is one thing, but to change an experienced mappers work to suit you own ideas, without any consultation, is tantamount to arrogance bordering on vandalism.
I trust these changes are restricted to Lampang, but I fear not ?
Im correcting your tardy work as I go, but hopefully you will read this and revert them all.
gscholz (2019-04-14 08:54:00+00:00): Hi Ale_moli23,
this changeset has created a significant amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.48618&lat=-25.37598&zoom=17

Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2019-05-04 07:46:46+00:00): Hi Ale_moli23, 
these errors still exists. Can you please take over resposibility and fix them?
Guido
gscholz (2019-06-02 06:30:12+00:00): Hi Ale_moli23,
these errors still exists. Can you please take over resposibility and fix them?
Guido
Die immer lacht (2019-04-15 14:26:51+00:00): Hi afetser,

it's really hard to figure out what you're changing. Please use changeset comments!
baindter (2019-04-24 07:30:04+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,
ich hatte das neu gebaute Haus Grünenbergstraße 20 mal als Adresse "vorgemerkt". Genauer erfasst hat es mittlerweile übrigens Kollege "Akkurator". Leider verstehe ich nicht, warum Du die Adresse gelöscht hattest. Die Adresse war richtig, da gibt es aus meiner Sicht keinen Grund die zu löschen.
Dein Engagement in Ehren (Respekt!), doch scheint mir wie neulich schon in Ravensburg (Gebäude auf Parkplatz) die Qualität zu leiden. Zudem will ich ungern Zeit damit verbringen, anderer Leute Aktivitäten regelmäßig zu prüfen.
Wie machen wir weiter?
Schöne Grüße
baindter
Geofreund1 (2019-04-24 10:55:44+00:00): Hallo baindter,
bitte beklage dich beim Kollegen Akkurator. Der hat deine offensichtlich falsche Adresse Grünenbergstraße 20 auf Stöcklisstraße 20 korrigiert.
Warum ich den Adressknoten seinerzeit gelöscht hatte, kann ich wirklich nicht sagen. Scheint nicht sehr sinnbehaftet gewesen zu sein. Ich freue mich aber, in dir jemanden getroffen zu haben, der keine Fehler macht. Respekt!
JamondAlexandre (2019-04-09 21:07:43+00:00): Thank you
Piet128 (2019-04-09 21:40:11+00:00): Hallo  letihu,
Danke für den Hinweis. Habe das Objekt erst einmal gelöscht, werde es mir vor Ort noch einmal anschauen und korrigieren.
Viele Grüße

Peter
skorasaurus (2019-04-26 21:02:18+00:00): thanks for mapping these Bill! I don't work in Central any more so I haven't been mapping that area.
frosm (2019-04-09 21:12:56+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
Pourquoi avoir supprimé la ligne au lieu de la renseigner comme enterrée ?
Michel 58 (2019-04-10 06:58:10+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai découvert OpenStreet Map hier, je suis donc tout nouveau sur le site. Je ne pensais pas faire une erreur en supprimant quelque chose qui n'existe plus et n'existera plus. Ceci dit vous pouvez laisser la carte telle qu' elle était avant ma modification, cela ne me dérange absolument pas
Désolé, je ferai mieux la prochaine fois.
Cordialement.
Recoil16 (2020-07-15 14:21:29+00:00): Hallo!
Mir ist klar, dass das hier jetzt ein Jahr her ist, aber ich möchte dich bitten, in Zukunft beim "Sesselmapping" etwas vorsichtiger zu sein, wenn Du die fraglichen Tatsachen nicht selbst vor Ort überprüfen kannst. Hier hast Du, anstatt das hier falsche "oneway=yes" zu entfernen, das korrekt gesetzte "junction=roundabout" an diesem zugegebenermaßen recht ungewöhnlichen Kreisverkehr entfernt, der aber tatsächlich mit eine Verkehrszeichen 215 als solcher gekennzeichnet ist. Dass das auf dem Luftbild vielleicht nicht nach einem Kreisverkehr aussieht, ist mir klar, dennoch gilt ja die "on the ground" Regel.
Grüße, Moritz
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-13 16:11:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136059221 where the changeset comment is: Reverting MAPS.ME garbage such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10893535607 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7125