piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-10-03 03:27:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mapbeks (2019-10-05 09:44:04+00:00): adjusted the crossing ways for this changeset. Kindly make sure to link or connect footways to a connected road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75208468
mueschel (2019-10-07 10:43:45+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag "lot_nunmber"? (Note the spelling mistake!)
This is not used in other places. 

Jan
mavl (2019-11-07 16:42:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mapbeks (2019-10-05 09:41:43+00:00): Hi Jerome! Kindly continue mapping the existing roads in the areas using Maxar Standard. It seems that it has a more updated imagery. Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75209814
Carnildo (2019-10-06 04:15:57+00:00): You appear to have broken the Post Falls city limits with this edit: there's an unclosed loop to the northwest of Poleline and Chase.
mavl (2019-11-07 16:42:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
user_5359 (2019-10-03 05:45:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. An a building doesn't have the name house, this more a description of building=yes.
eggie (2019-10-03 07:48:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Even een tip.. gebouwen en adressen kunnen op verzoek worden geïmporteerd. Er wordt niet zelf ingetekend.
Dit kan op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG,
Eggie
freebeer (2019-10-18 20:59:00+00:00): isn't this a rather unlikely place for a lawyer?

it looks to me that you've memorialised some misplaced onosm.org spam co-located on the city node before i could get around to nuking it.  there is no building here.
Neebski (2019-10-18 21:20:25+00:00): Ah my bad. I think I had taken the note info and location from another users note and added it.
Neebski (2019-10-18 22:37:16+00:00): Did some digging and found this address on their Facebook page. 101 W Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101

Do you suggest we add and move the poi location?
freebeer (2019-10-20 08:16:52+00:00): >   location from another users note  

be careful about this.  while onosm.org was naïvely conceived as a way for small businesses to put themselves on the map by proxy, recently in the english-speaking countries i monitor, it's been discovered by lazy or vandalistic seo companies, so that it often feels like half the onosm.org notes are placed on the city or town nodes, and a diminishing number are from real businesses themselves.

take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1966310 added more recently at this same spot.


>  Do you suggest we add and move the poi location?  

your call.  i nuke any notes like the above that are obviously from uncaring seo companies that want to do the least work possible to get their sucker^H^H^H^H^H^Hclients onto the map somewhere, anywhere.  i don't feel it is an appropriate use of mapper resources to research these misplaced notes and do unpaid work for these paid seo companies putting the often dubious businesses onto the map as if osm is some business directory with neat popups exploited by the ^Business\ Name advert-copy gang where less than 5% of notes worldwide are anywhere near the actual location, a large proportion being on an entirely wrong continent.

like i say, i leave it to you or any other mapper whether to re-activate any of the notes i've marked as wrong, visible at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country-feed?c=United%20States&a=closed and add the data in some correct location.

be advised in the above link i  was mostly offline, so the cases of `city/town node spam' are concentrated at the start now.

australia was particularly hit by this bad geolocation a month or two ago.
freebeer (2019-12-10 05:28:43+00:00): are you going to move or delete this node?  another town/city/country node spam appeared recently at this point, so naïve blind transfer from maps.me or onosm.org notes into osm data will result in a pile-up here, or in the other places.

i myself would nuke it, but due to android memory manglement i can't even bring up a javashite app without the browser being terminated, much less install flash.
Minh Nguyen (2019-10-03 06:02:47+00:00): CAGIS 2019 imagery was a source for some of these changes.
Kovoschiz (2019-10-03 10:35:33+00:00): You should add `entrance=*` at nodes where the `highway` intersects with the building
Kovoschiz (2019-10-03 10:36:06+00:00): (intersects and crosses into the building)
Kovoschiz (2019-10-03 10:36:30+00:00): (enter inside)
Seandebasti (2019-11-11 00:29:41+00:00): Hi, was bringt denn bei Nextbike der tag: "brand" etc. kann man alle nextbike irgendwie auslesen? Ich überleg ob das für berlin sinn macht.
PantherStrix (2019-11-12 16:30:49+00:00): Hi,
der Tag brand steht für die Marke "NextBike"; über brand:wikidata und brand:wikipedia erfolgt eine zusätzliche eindeutige Verknüpfung zum Wikidata-Datensatz bzw. zur Wikipedia-Seite. Ein Datenauswerter oder ein Kartenrenderer kann dann über den Wikidata-Datensatz z.B. weitere standardidisierte Informationen bei der Anzeige ergänzen, z.B. das Markenlogo oder Hintergrundinfos einblenden (= Wikipediaseite).
Das auslesen des Tags ist natürlich dann auch einfacher: siehe folgende Overpass-Abfrage: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/O2D
PantherStrix (2019-11-12 16:39:00+00:00): Ich sehe, dass du mit iD gearbeitet hast und wahrscheinlich automatisch die vorgeschlagenen Änderungen von iD angewandt hast. Der Name der Station ist eigentlich, dass, was jetzt in ref_name steht. Es war somit vorher "richtiger", da die jeweilige Station "RBB" usw. heißt und nicht "nextbike", denn das ist die Marke! Wäre also gut, wenn du das wieder rückgängig machst - ansonsten reverte ich den Changeset die nächsten Tage ...
Seandebasti (2019-11-16 10:42:51+00:00): Ja ich werd das bald korrigieren, gerade bin ich aber unterwegs. Gib mir ein bisschen Zeit.
Seandebasti (2019-11-16 12:42:56+00:00): ich werd die anderen auch noch mal reviewen, danke für die overpass abfrage, am code lern ich weiter dazu
nurdafur (2020-04-04 18:01:10+00:00): Hallo
Du/ihr habt bei der Schwägalp Anpassungen vorgenommen wegen dem neuen Hotel und der geänderten Parkplätze.
Ich bin gerade dabei den Alpenpanorama-Weg in einzelne Etappen aufzuteilen. Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass die Streckenführung auf der Schwägalp hier in OSM anders gezeichnet ist, als auf Schweizmobil.ch. Wenn du/ihr dies bei Gelegenheit einmal anschauen könntet, wäre das sehr toll.

Liebe Grüsse
Urs
user_5359 (2019-10-03 06:22:34+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three different roles (from, to, via), see all relation.
freebeer (2019-10-03 08:06:54+00:00): how is it that iD is leaving behind broken turn restrictions when one member is deleted?  do other editors do this?  does iD even warn about this?  this seems to be  happening far too often from the comments on detected brokenness i am seeing several times daily.
user_5359 (2019-10-03 09:34:08+00:00): Hello! Again: Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74157289. Please have also a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84713153.
Bert Araali (2019-10-29 21:31:06+00:00): Some overlapping ways caused the whole Lake Victoria to render incorrectly.  Took the community nearly a month to find and resolve.  Please next time check your warnings for overlapping ways and resolve them.
eggie (2019-10-03 07:53:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Robert van Beijeren (2019-10-03 08:33:37+00:00): Bedankt,zal ze doornemen
TourenbikerFKB (2019-10-04 20:20:36+00:00): Hallo Mario, du hast aus dem Hotelgrundstück ein Gebäude gemacht - das entspricht wohl nicht ganz den Tatsachen :-)
Vorher war die Fläche mit area gemappt. Retail ist für Einzelhandel gedacht, paßt also auch nicht. Ich würde tourism=hotel und name=Landhotel Kern vorschlagen, falls niemand eine bessere Idee hat.
TourenbikerFKB (2019-10-05 17:31:45+00:00): wurde inzwischen von user kartonage korrigiert.
TrueWeast (2020-01-23 22:30:17+00:00): Hello, Володимир Новіцький,
I noticed that a "motor_vehicle=no" tag remains on this bridge after your fixme tag was removed by another user here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78655253. Are you able to confirm whether the construction on this bridge is complete at this time? Thank you!
Володимир Новіцький (2020-01-24 07:47:57+00:00): Ремонт мосту триває. Облаштовуються пішохідні проходи. Рух транспорту вже дозволений.
TrueWeast (2020-01-24 17:13:25+00:00): Thanks for the information!
acet2ngaia (2019-10-03 07:16:08+00:00): Hi! Please don't add things to OSM that don't exist in real life.
acet2ngaia (2019-10-03 07:17:13+00:00): Oops, replied to myself above instead of previous editor.
user_11166885 (2020-05-25 11:12:21+00:00): Sorry, but road 208 in the treatment the 409 and 627 should be a secondary one, while between 627 and the A1 tertiary. I'm wrong? Sources?
Kovoschiz (2019-10-03 10:34:10+00:00): Fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75224070
eggie (2019-10-03 07:55:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-10-03 18:28:03+00:00): Hello! A restriction relation must have three (or more) roles (from, to, via), see all three relation.
mavl (2019-12-26 15:56:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были взяты адресные данные?
iWowik (2020-01-25 21:28:01+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о комментариях в этом пакете правок и в этом https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77353578

Поэтому повторю вопрос, который и меня интересует:
Где вы берете информацию об адресах домиков?
Dimacn (2019-10-03 19:20:18+00:00): Вы удалили тег building. Т.к. здание существует, пожалуйста верните его.
eggie (2019-10-03 07:59:35+00:00): Dag Joris. Al die communicatiemasten zijn ooit geïmporteerd uit een database en niet al te precies geplaatst. Je kunt ze in het vervolg verplaatsen naar de juiste plek op het dak. Veel masten zijn al niet meer uptodate.
Kijk goed op de luchtfoto  Dit was je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=75214955 
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2020-12-18 22:02:29+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered what your source was for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39432916 being unclassified?  Quite a lot of stuff is wrong here, and I'm trying to unpick the "unusual classifications" from the "downright wrong ones".
Best Regards,
Andy
YaStratospheric (2020-12-19 15:31:17+00:00): Hello!
Thank you for your comment. I put highway=unclassified for Chantry Lane to Saxton, as this road connected Chantry Lane to B1217 based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified, however I did not have data for the entire road, so I changed only part.

Also Chantry Lane was formerly highway=tertiary and Chantry Lane to Saxton was formerly a highway=bridleway. Therefore, I agree that there are unusual classifications here. Thanks for your edits!
SomeoneElse (2020-12-19 22:26:34+00:00): Hi,
I'm pretty sure that Chantry Lane isn't a tertiary.  I wrote a fair bit about the changes I was undoing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96092135 .
It can be helpful to look at OS OpenData StreetView and OS OpenMap Local to see what is "unclassified" and what is "service".  That has this road changing from unclassified to service just after the bridge over the stream - see https://b.os.openstreetmap.org/layer/gb_os_sv_2016_04/16/32533/21093.png , around https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/53.8337/-1.2917 .  This isn't 100% reliable - I believe that the unclasified bit of Old London Road stops a bit north of where OS OpenData thinks it does around https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/53.86574/-1.28189 .
I doubt Chantry Lane to Saxton  was ever just a bridleway, and I doubt that is the correct name, either.
I will have a more detailed look when I get a chance.
Best Regards,
Andy
YaStratospheric (2020-12-20 10:22:17+00:00): Hello!
Yes, you are right, thanks for your comment and detailed explanations. Always happy to help if you need it.
Best Regards,
Ivan
dmlu (2019-10-03 10:21:08+00:00): Hi, 

Are you sure this road is "Rue Joseph Lentz"? I can see the street sign on the "Route de Luxembourg" that says "rue de la chapelle". CACLR (official dataset) also says the buildings belong to "rue de la chapelle".
pfonck (2019-10-03 15:25:52+00:00): Yes  A decision has been made by the "Conseil communal e la commune de Roeser"  Details can be found on:
https://www.roeser.lu/resources?mode=download&com=0I60I0I0I&type=pdf&dir=_base_4&file=1444179725125.pdf
Best regards   Pierre
dmlu (2019-10-03 16:08:38+00:00): Thank you for the information! :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 19:58:02+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3377930 ?
Pepe la Poule (2019-11-26 14:43:42+00:00): I would like to change the adress oh the restaurant Pepe la poule to "22 Quang khanh" 
And the opening hours to "11am to 10.30pm"
Pepe la Poule (2019-11-26 14:44:05+00:00): How can I do that please?
JonB2019 (2019-11-27 13:12:10+00:00): I did the changes on address and opening hours of restaurant Pepe la Poule, on modifications group 77633191.
RicoElectrico (2019-10-03 09:26:53+00:00): Cześć, spytam dla potwierdzenia. Czy adres również był tu nieprawidłowo dodany? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677833241/history
SQ2FRD (2019-10-03 10:06:31+00:00): Tak. Ten dom prywatny ma adres Cekcyn ul. Szkolna 43B (to bud.kontrahenta stąd wiem).
chlenix (2020-10-11 21:42:11+00:00): а с какого перепугу эта улица стала Терновская?
Антін Сартенченко (2020-10-11 22:00:48+00:00): Какая именно улица? я не пойму.
Антін Сартенченко (2020-10-11 22:15:11+00:00): А я понял! Это остаток старой Терновской улицы, которая, по-видимому, раньше проходила через Камыши.

Жадько В. А. Улицы Николаева : справочник / В. А. Жадько. — Одесса : Маяк, 1990. — 192 с. — С. 124.

«ТЕРНОВСКАЯ ул. — от ул. Комсомольской до ул. Сафронова. Центральный р-н. Отд. св. № 3; для телеграмм — № 55. Трамв. 3 (ул. Дзержинского).»
chlenix (2020-10-12 07:39:41+00:00): так ее нет ни в одном реестре. на карте Міськради она Каразіна: shorturl.at/enB47
в переименованиях она бывш. Кладбищенская, я не ходил смотреть таблички конечно, кстати не могу найти и прочитать книгу Сафронова.
chlenix (2020-10-12 08:40:47+00:00): проверил, в ДРВ есть таки это название
BCNorwich (2019-10-04 07:24:20+00:00): Hi, Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
for OSM golf course guidelines.
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
opendcc (2019-10-03 14:36:53+00:00): Please do not only delete your stuff, but restore the previous landuse.

Thank you.
AndersAndersson (2019-10-03 20:38:28+00:00): Två noder flyttades av misstag så jag flyttade tillbaka dessa i detta changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75252191
Aerond (2019-10-03 23:46:19+00:00): Ah, hoppsan.. Tack så mycket. :)
Alecs01 (2019-10-19 15:08:16+00:00): Ciao, qui e in altri changeset hai creato oggetti duplicati (percorso e relazione), fai attenzione per favore.
4004 (2019-10-03 20:54:15+00:00): спасибо, человек на вишневце не заметил, что дом сдали. может у вас там и проезд возле домов достроили?
user_5359 (2019-10-03 10:36:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly your own keys). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Leo Slager (2019-10-03 22:54:46+00:00): Changing the roundabout was not correct and damaged the routerelations of busses 3 and 4.
Your changeset is reverted.
Never change a routerelation using the editor iD.  The editor iD will always damage the routerelations  by placing the ways not in a correct order !
canfe (2019-10-17 08:29:32+00:00): Penso che tu abbia partecipato come me al mapping party per la disabilità a Ottobre. Dato che sei passata nei giardini, sapresti dirmi se i vari sentieri sono davvero anche per biciclette? Che ci circolino è un conto, ma non vedo nessun cartello a parte una ciclabile, solo ciclabile, in Viale dei partigiani.
CinziaDR90 (2019-10-22 18:07:24+00:00): Buonasera! Non vedendo alcun cartello di esplicito divieto per le bici e trattandosi di giardini  ho pensato che fosse di un sentiero misto. Se hai notato cartelli di obbligo/divieto che mi sono sfuggiti non farti alcun problema ad aggiornare e correggere i tag relativi ai tratti in questione.
A presto,
Cinzia
Rotflamingo2 (2021-04-01 07:48:45+00:00): Hallo JochenOSM, eine Frage zur Umsetzung: die neue Brücke über die Erf ist aus Al,  breit genug für Fahrzeuge und mit einer sandpapierartigen Fahrbahnoberfläche. Motorfahrzeuge sind mit Sign 260 beidseitig verboten. Sign 240 ist entfernt. Zumindest die Einfahrt von der Josef-Ulrich-Str. ist damit nicht mehr als Fuß- oder Radweg ausgewiesen. Was wäre sinnvollerweise zu ändern?
JochenOSM (2021-04-10 09:36:13+00:00): Danke für die Info das die neue Brücke endlich fertig ist. Habe das mal versucht in Änderungssatz 102687384 umzusetzen.
joost schouppe (2022-03-16 13:05:55+00:00): "R4 N70 Oostakker" lijkt me een gekke naam voor deze site: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10036629/
Is "Schansakker" echt fout?
topolusitania (2019-10-03 09:44:22+00:00): Obrigado Alexmol
user_5359 (2019-10-03 10:40:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! ou aren't a travel agency.

I suspect you had some help entering these data. Please inform the person that the way is suitable to delete the data as SPAM immediately. If he needs help to improve his method, he is welcome to contact me.
user_5359 (2019-10-03 10:43:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
PT-53 (2019-10-03 12:47:03+00:00): Hallo  MaestroGlanz,
bist Du Dir sicher, daß das
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238587896/history
eine Kirche ist?
Fragende Grüße
MaestroGlanz (2019-10-03 18:40:19+00:00): Jap. Die sind beide nebeneinander. Das eine ist die Klosterkirche, das andere die Gemeindekirche. Ich meine, es sei St. Franzikus. Der ist über der Tür angebracht. Bin mir aber nicht sicher, deshalb hab ich es gelassen. building:architecture=baroque für beide.
MaestroGlanz (2019-10-03 18:43:10+00:00): Laut Gemeindewebseite heißt die nur Klosterkapelle.
MaestroGlanz (2019-10-07 17:41:15+00:00): Amenity hat noch gefehlt. Hab den Rest auch gleich erledigt.
user_2066394 (2021-07-24 20:50:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2768714
4004 (2019-10-03 21:39:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6846859613 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6846859614 dupe?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1627245079 09:00 - 02:00 ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6846859605 в одном здании с армтеком или опять кривой геокодер?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2388035077 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3033946333 тут и правда два отделения напротив, или одно все же обменник?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6846859599 vs https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6846859598

currency:byr устарело, и ISO код валюты пишется капсом (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:currency) - ваш софт все в строчные переводит?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3939210557 по этой точке у вас однозначно кривые данные, ее реверчу

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6846859606 как обычно не смотрите, а геокодеру без разницы, какое из зданий по адресу горького 91 ставить - все ваши точки будут на короне, но без точного положения они бесполезны (плюс оно уже отмечено там). занесите этот адрес в черный список или наймите qa

ну и на сайте и вывесках везде IdeaBank, если так надо название на кириллице пишите в name:ru
Asumarin (2019-10-04 08:10:14+00:00): 1. нет, это точки цбу и цоб
2. да, они работают до двух ночи (трудяги)
3. в одном здании, все верно
4. одно из них ркц
5. как и в случае с первой пометкой, там цбу и цоб
6. спасибо, внесем на поправку
7. можно уточнить что именно там неверно? в евроопте стоит точка ркц
вся информация была сверена с их сайтом https://www.ideabank.by/o-banke/otdeleniya-banka/
4004 (2019-10-04 13:55:33+00:00): 1 это мапится через синтаксис opening_hours (Mo-Fr "цбу" etc), или хотя бы разделяется рефами - как клиенту понять, какая из точек цбу?
2 обалдеть, надо к ним заехать
5 как и в 1, как вывести эту разницу из точек что ву отметили?
7 неверное время работы, на сайте очевидно не указаны перерывы. про ркц это вы правы, сейчас перетегирую с обменников

в подтверждение моих слов про нейм https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=HxYbwHc-yEcsRW0EfAdCcA&focus=photo&lat=53.71152947638889&lng=23.849617335833333&z=17&x=0.8800301771556425&y=0.6990006936566104&zoom=3
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=ErfpAreSBpaR0HWJiTvcTQ&focus=photo&lat=53.7112886&lng=23.8496425&z=17&x=0.781291030353251&y=0.46266829347071137&zoom=3 2016
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=JHBRCeXsaq9kN_8o9IoNxg&focus=photo&lat=53.151625&lng=29.224874999999997&z=17&x=0.11151005772342143&y=0.46562824375766004&zoom=2.461481485811311 2019
user_10224139 (2019-10-07 12:50:13+00:00): Какие рефы должны быть у этих двух точек, чтобы всё было красиво?
user_10224139 (2019-10-07 12:56:55+00:00): Я сейчас про ЦОБ и ЦБУ
4004 (2019-10-07 15:36:03+00:00): что то вида "ЦБУ 111", "ЦБО 222". но две точки это костыль, чтоб было красиво надо через время работы - на сайте то у них небось одна точка
user_10224139 (2019-10-07 15:45:07+00:00): На сайте указано как две отдельные точки. Ты имеешь ввиду, чтобы была одна точка с временем работы, где прямо в значении написано когда ЦБУ и когда ЦОБ работает, я правильно понял?
4004 (2019-10-07 16:41:51+00:00): у приора и белинвеста вроде все на одной точке.
да, именно это и имею в виду - в спеке opening hours есть специально текстовые поля, но это конечно сложнее чем 2 точки
mavl (2019-11-07 16:42:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
ma-rt-in (2019-10-04 17:54:14+00:00): Hallo,
sollte ein Geschäft nicht das ganze Gebäude für sich alleie Beanspruchen, dann bitte als seperate Node setzen. Dies fällt mir bei der Sparkasse nämlich auf.
vg