piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jmsbert (2024-01-13 21:35:17+00:00): Hallo,
ist zwar schon eine Weile her, aber befinden sich an den Positionen, an die Du die Adressknoten verschoben hast, die Eingänge? Falls ja, wäre hier entrance=yes passend und die Adressdaten wären als Tag an der Kontur besser aufgehoben. Bitte um Rückmledung, dann würde ich das erledigen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103800694
skorpion62 (2024-01-15 07:03:34+00:00): Hallo jmbert,
ich habe die Adressen auf die Linie gesetzt weil damals Du die Adressen eingetragen hattest, aber keine Gebäudeumrisse  gemappt hattest. In der Regel habe ich zu der Zeit die Adressen auch dahin gesetzt wo sich auch der Eingang befand, nur kann ich das heute nicht mehr mit 100%tiger Sicherheit sagen. Ich bin gelegentlich in Nortrup, da kann ich das ja nochmal erkunden.
Viele Grüße skorpion62
skorpion62 (2024-01-15 07:16:18+00:00): Nur zur Info!
ich habe die Adressen von der Linie entfernt
rthik007 (2021-04-29 05:03:43+00:00): Hi ruggs,
I have Recreated the residential road which was deleted.
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103811933
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103800802
kartonage (2021-04-29 07:45:08+00:00): Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

please don't add description as names. They are meant for proper names (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre for more information).

Thanks!

Hola y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap,

por favor no agregue descripciones como nombres. Están pensados para nombres propios (consulte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre para obtener más información).

¡Gracias!
Marek-M (2021-04-29 06:57:07+00:00): Cześć, o ile rozumiem zmianę name=Biedronka na name=parking Biedronka (chociaż ten tag powinien być usunięty wg mnie), to zmiany operator=Biedronka na operator=parking Biedronka chyba są zbędne. Do tej pory wydawało mi się, że oznaczenie parkingu przy sklepie powinno oznaczać się bez tagu name wypełniając tylko tag operator=nazwa_sklepu i dodając access=customers
Olga | Yanosik (2021-04-29 07:24:49+00:00): Obiektów parkingowych o tagu name jest 1801, w większości sensownych. Dodaję słowo parking w name przy obiektach handlowych gdyż nawigacje biorą taki parking do wyników wyszukiwania. Być może trzeba tak jak piszesz usuwać name z takich parkingów. Nie chciałam zaczynać dyskusji w społeczności dlatego wybrałam tą linię działania. A ta nazwa w tagu operator to przypadek :)
GinaroZ (2021-09-19 23:17:13+00:00): What does ref=3 mean on this bridge? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418061440
portalaventura (2021-04-28 21:08:29+00:00): Luiz Antonio Marçal Bueno, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de São Paulo mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmsp.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
rthik007 (2021-04-29 04:52:24+00:00): Hi fb2517,
I have removed unnecessary road 
way 936511763
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103808514
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103801643
archie (2021-04-28 21:29:08+00:00): Hej, jag undrar, enkelriktad trafik gäller väl här bara för cykektrafiken? Borde det inte vara så här istället? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103802148
Richard L (2021-04-29 06:12:48+00:00): Min tolkning efter att ha läst
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway
var att på en highway=path borde oneway=yes och oneway:bicycle=yes ha samma innebörd eftersom oneway inte berör fotgängare utan bara fordon. Alltså antar jag i sådana fall att oneway=yes bara berör cyklar. Men jag har ingen direkt preferens för den ena eller andra varianten.
Richard L (2021-04-29 06:15:26+00:00): Sedan står det på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway:bicycle?uselang=sv
att oneway:bicycle används när det är annorlunda för cyklar än andra fordon, vilket kanske då inte är fallet på en path.
archie (2021-04-29 09:53:46+00:00): Det du skriver låter mycket rimligt. Hoppas bara att ingen byter path mot cycleway här också.
blackboxlogic (2021-05-23 12:45:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this hotel. There was already a node in this location that had the address. You added the building with the same address (which is better than the node because it has more information). When I do this, I delete the node so that the information isn't duplicated. Also, phone numbers in OSM should be formatted for international use. In this case: 	+1-207-338-2304. Please ask if you have questions. It looks like you're trying to add a business to the map but you didn't mark it as a business, just a "building" with a name. Consider adding: tourism=bed_and_breakfast.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103802104
blackboxlogic (2021-06-27 14:14:59+00:00): Since you didn't respond, I made some corrections.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103802104
Recoil16 (2021-04-29 17:16:05+00:00): Hi Ruben,
könntest Du mir eventuell erklären, warum Du maxspeed=DE:urban setzt? Das ist nirgends dokumentiert und ist soweit ich weiß von keinen Applikationen unterstützt. maxspeed:type oder source:maxspeed sind mir bekannt, aber als maxspeed=* sollen meines Wissens nach nur die tatsächlichen Werte gesetzt werden.
Grüße Moritz
RubenKelevra (2021-04-29 21:49:51+00:00): Ist schon seit ner Weile so im Wiki dokumentiert, zumindest im Englischen Teil.

source:maxspeed=* ist ja nicht mehr als eine Notiz, maxspeed:type=* macht auch wenig Sinn.

DE:urban ist ja eindeutig definiert als 50 km/h, ergibt also keinen Sinn Redundanzen zu schaffen und maxspeed=50 UND DE:urban hin zu schreiben.

Hab in der Gegend verifiziert, teilweise ist das außerhalb der Ortschaft und damit eben ein explizites maxspeed=50. Die impliziten hab ich entsprechend dann mit maxspeed=DE:urban markiert.

Ansonsten war da relativ viel Kraut und Rüben durch die 4 verschiedenen Tags, was ich ebenfalls aufgeräumt hab.

Mir ist im Gegenzug keine Applikation bekannt die source:maxspeed=* oder maxspeed:type=* versteht. :)
Recoil16 (2021-04-30 08:44:27+00:00): Dass durch die verschiedenen Arbeitsweisen und Tag-"Standards" viel Kraut und Rüben ist, ist mir klar, allerdings machst Du es jetzt meiner Meinung nach nur noch schlimmer indem Du noch ein zusätzliches Schema einführst, das zumindest in Deutschland weit davon entfernt ist, geläufig zu sein. Auch ist der Zweck von source:maxspeed bzw. maxspeed:type mMn auch nicht, wirklich von einer Applikation wie einem Router ausgewertet zu werden. Vielmehr ist für mich der Zweck, im Falle einer Änderung der StVO unterscheiden zu können, wo etwa maxspeed=50 aufgrund eines expliziten Schildes gilt und wo etwa dadurch, dass man sich innerhalb geschlossener Ortschaft befindet. Und ja, im englischen Wiki steht etwas über das Verwenden von impliziten tags im maxspeed key, dort steht aber auch, dass das nur in manchen lokalen Communities wie Russland und Rumänien geläufig ist.
Recoil16 (2021-04-30 09:00:49+00:00): Habe auch einen Thread im Forum aufgemacht: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72663
Vinber-Pro (2021-05-03 14:04:52+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue :)

merci pour votre contribution !

Quelques ressources, si vous le souhaitez https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Bonne journée
Stylez995 (2021-05-08 14:13:33+00:00): Hei, Deler av Rostockgata er fortsatt enveiskjørt. Jeg så "innkjøring forbudt"-skiltet der i går. Jeg har derfor lagt inn igjen enveiskjøring-taggen.

Siden den siste versjonen er av "Norge i Bilder" ortofoto har ikke slik skilting og oppmerking for tida, så har jeg lagt inn merknad i strekningen for å få oppmerksomheten på dette.
kunyasobe (2021-05-08 14:34:37+00:00): 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
sanchi (2021-04-28 22:00:44+00:00): Hola.
El name es para poner el nombre que tiene. Este camino no se llama "Zona Militar Cerrada".
GinaroZ (2021-04-28 22:06:51+00:00): Why have you removed railway=abandoned from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295653246 ?
eggie (2021-04-29 05:06:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

feedback Wanneer iets voor lange tijd is afgesloten en het op een andere manier terugkomt kan inderdaad een weg op construction worden gezet.
Wanneer het voor een kortere periode is dan doen we dat met conditionaltagging 
bv access:conditional=no @ (2020 Jan 20-2020 Apr 3) 
Hier zie ik nu wel een highway=construction liggen op een bestande weg.
Ik speel het even door naar een ervaren mapper die zich met de infrastructure van doorgaande wegen bezig houdt.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
A67-A67 (2021-04-29 11:26:05+00:00): De N206 wordt hier verbreedt naar 2x2 rijstroken. Dat was al weergeven als weg in aanleg ten zuidwesten van de oude weg. Tijdens de werkzaamheden blijft de huidige weg, op een aantal weekendafsluitingen na, gewoon geopend. De huidige weg hoeft dus niet op construction (weg in aanleg) of op access:conditional (tijdelijke afsluiting) gezet te worden.

Deze wijziging voegt alleen een weg in aanleg toe, die is vastgeplakt boven op de bestaande weg. Het zal zeker goed bedoeld zijn, maar ik zou het terugdraaien, want het stond al correct op de kaart en deze wijziging is niet de juiste manier om deze werkzaamheden aan te geven.
eggie (2021-04-29 11:34:26+00:00): reverted by changeset  #103841349
Kvl1101 (2021-04-29 16:32:37+00:00): Beste allebei, 
Bedankt voor een korte uitleg. Aangezien ik sinds gisteren erachter kwam dat FM gebruik maakt van OSM en ik  elke dag over deze route ga en deze op FM erg "slordig" door elkaar heen gaat probeerde ik via deze weg de hele weg van Katwijk tot Leiden als 1 hele wegwerkzaamheden te markeren. Helaas heb ik hier niet genoeg kennis voor om dit op de juiste manier te doen en heb ik het even snel gegoogled en kwam ik uit op de Highway=construction. De bedoeling was meer voor de netheid gezien deze weg de komende 2 jaar nog in onderhoud is.
eggie (2021-04-29 17:10:21+00:00): Beste K.. In het begin is alles rijstebrij.. Wanneer je meer gaat mappen komt de kennis vanzelf. Laat je niet weerhouden door kritiek.
Mvg
Eggie
portalaventura (2021-04-28 21:47:55+00:00): pionti, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de Mato Grosso do Sul mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osm_ms.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
VictorIE (2023-10-14 15:31:07+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/744765205/

foot=no conflicts with footway=yes

footway=yes is deprecated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
ivanbranco (2021-05-02 17:18:47+00:00): Ciao peppe10,

potresti rispondere ai commenti ai changeset invece che procedere in una edit war, è la seconda volta che annulli le modifiche da me effettuate. Ti avevo commentato lo scorso changeset, allego link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103566544 ma non hai nemmeno risposto.

Le modifiche da me effettuate sono allineate agli standard decisi dalla community italiana di OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade

questa volta ti copio-incollo anche la parte interessata:
"Le aree di circolazione che riportano date composte solo da giorni e mese, si inseriscono esplicitando il giorno in lettere. Es: Via Venticinque Aprile. Eventualmente usate il tag alt_name=* per inserire il giorno con i numeri romani. Es: Via XXV Aprile."
sara qasem (2021-05-18 14:13:04+00:00): Hello Osamarefatt,
Please verify you data source so we can update the map if there's any thing wrong, and you can send me any master plans for the change you did to update the whole area.
Thanks,
Sara
johnarupire (2021-05-12 23:04:09+00:00): Hola Beto_70
Es necesario que sigas las recomendaciones de mapeo e indiques en el comentario qué es lo que estás haciendo. Si dejas "LAVV" no se entiende.
Saludos
OmSweetOm (2021-05-03 22:01:41+00:00): Correction: Source used was DigitalGlobe 2021-03-28
Rogoyski (2021-07-10 13:48:34+00:00): W przypadku Romera 4B kopiowanie obrysu budynku z Geoportalu to moim zdaniem przesada. Teraz wyłączone z obrysu są znaczne części budynku, np. na wjazdem do garażu. O ile Geoportal takie nadwieszenia wyklucza, to w OSM raczej włącza się je w obrys.
syntex (2021-07-10 16:00:58+00:00): Trochę poprawiłem
Rogoyski (2021-07-10 17:40:33+00:00): Dzięki.
Glassman (2021-04-30 19:43:05+00:00): I'm not involved with this project, but your roads appears to be going through houses. I'd recommend reviewing your edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103803849
Glassman (2021-04-30 19:50:59+00:00): #TIP: The area around the storage units would typically be something like landuse=commercial. Can you update your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103804209
Glassman (2021-04-30 19:48:12+00:00): #TIP: Update the changeset comment after each edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103804307
Glassman (2021-04-30 19:52:36+00:00): #TIP: The latest imagery you are viewing may be offset from when the first edit was made. You can update the offset using the editors background layers icon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103804312
portalaventura (2021-04-28 23:20:46+00:00): MatheusMedeiros, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Rio de Janeiro mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmrj.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Glassman (2021-04-30 19:48:52+00:00): #TIP: Square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103804363
portalaventura (2021-04-28 23:25:01+00:00): costasa, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Rio de Janeiro mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmrj.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
MargoKat (2021-04-30 17:04:27+00:00): Hi costasa and welcome you to the OSM community! I noticed some of your recent edits aren’t matching up with the public resource you’ve cited and I reverted the following changesets in order to restore pre-existing data: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103805931/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103805979/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103804411/

The following ways that were deleted for example are visible in public resources that are used by the larger OSM community. These are seen in Maxar Premium Imagery, Esri World Imagery, and Bing Aerial Imagery among others, which indicates that they likely do exist and should not have been deleted.
way 834953045 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834953045)
way 232538849(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232538849)
way 232545520(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232545520) 

The alignment of the following roads for example do not match with Maxar Premium Imagery, which was cited as a resource in your changesets. I also wasn’t able to find alternative public resources that support these alignment edits. It seems to me that the original modeling of these roads was more accurate. 
way 31587965(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31587965)
way 936539574(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936539574)
way 31587965(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31587965)

The roads listed below don’t appear to fit the OpenStreetMap criteria for links. I recommend checking out this wiki page for highway classifications and links, which may be helpful as you start editing: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
way 232541165(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232541165)  
way 232494882(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232494882)
way 232541155 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232541155)

If you haven’t done so already, I also recommend exploring more of the wiki pages which are great additional resources for general editing guidelines in OpenStreetMap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Página_principal). https://learnosm.org/pt/ is also a great resource for learning the basics of how to edit in OSM.  Thanks and let me know if you have questions!

- MargoKat
krusefahrer (2022-03-24 20:35:41+00:00): Hi JDJ,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936528059/history is totally unconnected.
jdj150 (2022-03-27 15:59:53+00:00): If you look at the TOPO map it is a sinkhole it goes in to.
OddlyAngled (2021-04-29 14:10:19+00:00): it was previously slightly off too, I updated this using the current 2018 US Topo in https://osmcha.org/changesets/103849283
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103804905
5m4u9 (2021-04-29 07:31:26+00:00): hola, las ediciones que hiciste de areas que parecen ser manzanas, muchas de estas estna mal dibujadas o sin precisión aceptable o invaden la calzada.

Comparando con la capa de manzanas del mapa de la alcaldia difiere mucho.
5m4u9 (2021-04-29 07:31:57+00:00): esta siendo restituido
village (2021-05-26 19:44:42+00:00): Es gab ein Problem mit den Nachmittagsöffnungszeiten
"–" ist nicht "-" aber für Öffnungszeiten gewünscht / nötig.
Kein Problem, hab's korrigiert: https://osm.org/changeset/105376856  oder auch (Vergleich mit anderen Punkten mit Warnungen) in https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/?zoom=17&lat=51.20276&lon=12.61117&layers=B0T&filter=none&tags=opening_hours
skquinn (2021-04-29 01:24:59+00:00): This changeset reverts changes made in the following changesets: 103785346 103786346 103800626 103801599
Glassman (2021-04-30 19:53:47+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103805856
MxxCon (2021-04-30 03:17:20+00:00): Perhaps it's worth adding fixme tag so highlight that this would need to be re-surveyed and fixed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103805911
MargoKat (2021-04-30 17:03:54+00:00): Hi costasa and welcome you to the OSM community! I noticed some of your recent edits aren’t matching up with the public resource you’ve cited and I reverted the following changesets in order to restore pre-existing data: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103805931/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103805979/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103804411/

The following ways that were deleted for example are visible in public resources that are used by the larger OSM community. These are seen in Maxar Premium Imagery, Esri World Imagery, and Bing Aerial Imagery among others, which indicates that they likely do exist and should not have been deleted.
way 834953045 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834953045)
way 232538849(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232538849)
way 232545520(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232545520) 

The alignment of the following roads for example do not match with Maxar Premium Imagery, which was cited as a resource in your changesets. I also wasn’t able to find alternative public resources that support these alignment edits. It seems to me that the original modeling of these roads was more accurate. 
way 31587965(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31587965)
way 936539574(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936539574)
way 31587965(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31587965)

The roads listed below don’t appear to fit the OpenStreetMap criteria for links. I recommend checking out this wiki page for highway classifications and links, which may be helpful as you start editing: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
way 232541165(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232541165)  
way 232494882(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232494882)
way 232541155 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232541155)

If you haven’t done so already, I also recommend exploring more of the wiki pages which are great additional resources for general editing guidelines in OpenStreetMap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Página_principal). https://learnosm.org/pt/ is also a great resource for learning the basics of how to edit in OSM.  Thanks and let me know if you have questions!

- MargoKat
ovruni (2021-04-29 04:57:18+00:00): Hola, he notado que en sus últimos conjuntos de cambios se ha agregado "cycleway=lane" [0] sobre vías que ya tenían "cycleway:left=lane" [1], que brinda mayor detalle como se indica en la documentación de "cycleway=lane". Por favor revise la documentación sobre las diferencias para uso de cada uno de ellos en la wiki. Procedo a revertir estos cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:cycleway%3Dlane
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway:left%3Dlane