piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Swekl (2018-11-29 18:35:00+00:00): https://www.google.ru/maps/@55.0302821,37.4744184,663m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=ru&authuser=0
maraf24 (2018-11-29 19:50:44+00:00): Co to znaczy "do zgodności z planem"?
Do OSM nie wprowadzamy nigdy żadnych planów, zawsze liczy się, co aktualnie jest w terenie. Czy na tej działce działa teraz jakaś firma przemysłowa?
Rafał Jakub (2018-11-29 21:39:12+00:00): W rejonie pomiędzy Traugutt a Żeromskiego są firmy o różnej działalności. PPHU j Wendler firma włókiennicza, niedawno powstała Hartman to też producent ale tutaj ma biura i część handlową. Pozostali to sklepu i usługi stacja enzynowa itp. Zauważyłem że innych rejonach miasta tego typu obszary o mieszanej działaności są definiowane jako przemysłowe, stąd maja zmiana. Prosż o podpowiedź czy mam pozostawić jako strefę przemysłową PPHU Wendler, a pozostąłą częć zmienić?
maraf24 (2018-12-02 15:16:10+00:00): Przy mieszanej dzialalności przyjmuje się oznaczenie działalności przeważającej lub dzieli się na mniejsze obszary np. na podstawie ogrodzeń, by użyć różnych landuse.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Geim (2019-01-26 13:44:36+00:00): Hoi Robin,

Bij het mappen van de Bosbeek heb je intersecties gemaakt met highways. https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=14&lat=48.20808&lon=16.37221
Zou je hier eens naar willen kijken?

Gr. Geim
frosm (2020-02-01 13:42:48+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650740637
qu'est-ce que c'est ?
l'attribut utilisé est celui d'un terre-plein/talus, j'imagine que ce n'est pas cela qu'on a bâti en travers de la route
JLD46 (2020-02-01 18:42:46+00:00): C'est pourtant bien le cas. Cette sortie est bloquée par un talus qui ne permet le passage qu'aux piétons et cyclistes. Cdlt. JLD
frosm (2020-02-01 20:23:12+00:00): merci pour l'info
et donc le piéton monte d'un mètre sur un talus (de terre), fait un pas, puis redescend le talus ?
JLD46 (2020-02-02 07:26:31+00:00): Il existe de chaque coté du talus un passage d'un mètre sans obstacle. Le talus fait 1,5 de haut mais il devrait être supprimé dans l'année pour créer l'accès au nouveau lycée de Bretenoux.
chazanov (2018-11-29 19:16:14+00:00): And another power relation for the "CU" HVDC line.
andrewwiseman (2018-11-29 19:02:27+00:00): more sources: https://reliefweb.int/report/haiti/haiti-minustah-implements-restoration-projets-route-des-rails-port-au-prince
https://www.communication.gouv.ht/2017/11/la-construction-de-lechangeur-de-la-route-des-rails-carrefour-progresse-a-grand-pas/
https://www.facebook.com/878341398910757/photos/a.882771321801098/1958627540882132/?type=3&theater
Carnildo (2018-11-30 06:52:57+00:00): #WatchYourNodeDrags

Seriously.  In addition to whatever you were doing in Africa, you moved an administrative boundary in Ireland and dragged an intersection in San Francisco to a point several blocks away.
gileri (2018-11-30 18:52:52+00:00): La piste cyclable a été remise, mais les arbres de nouveau enlevés...

Avant l'envoi des modifications sur JOSM, il y a une liste des objets modifiés, ça aide pour déterminer s'ils n'y a pas eu trop d'objets modifiés par erreur
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
zors1843 (2018-11-30 09:18:32+00:00): Enkel voetgangers of ook fietsers toegelaten ?
andrecallebaut (2018-11-30 09:26:09+00:00): Ook fietsers.
zors1843 (2018-11-30 09:28:09+00:00): Aangepast.  Hartelijk dank.
woodpeck_repair (2018-11-29 21:26:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65025483 where the changeset comment is: Restoring Ukraine as per https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2018-11-14_Crimea . See also: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%D0%94%D1%96%D0%B2%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B7_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%97/blocks
undsoweiter (2018-11-29 20:06:33+00:00): Bei den unterirdischen Parkhäusern An den Röthen "amenity=parking" rausgenommen, da auf Map so gerendert wird, als wäre überirdisch.
highflyer74 (2018-11-29 21:45:23+00:00): Hallo... das funktioniert so nicht.

Zum einen ist ein Parkplatz ohne amenity=parking kein Parkplatz mehr (Du hast damit das Haupt-Attribut entfernt), und zum anderen ist eine der Grundregeln von OSM, dass wir uns beim Tagging nicht danach richten, was ein Renderer daraus macht. Wenn die Macher der Standardkarte das so darstellen wollen, ist das ihre Entscheidung. Andere Karten oder Apps auf OSM-Basis stellen es vielleicht nicht oder anders da. Deshalb: bitte wieder hinzufügen!

Lies Dich bitte ein wenig in die Funktionsweise von OSM ein, bevor Du weitermappst. Wertvolle Informationen findest Du in den untenstehenden Links:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
-
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
-
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Nmxosm (2018-11-30 07:52:43+00:00): Der genannten Kritik schließe ich mich an (siehe auch https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer). 

Außerdem ist mir dies aufgefallen:

Die Wege https://osm.org/way/650760666 https://osm.org/way/650760664 gehören zu keinem Gebäude. Aus dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:part): 
>Zusätzlich zu den Buildingparts sollte es noch eine umschließende Linie mit dem Attribut building=yes, um das Gesamtgebäude zu kennzeichnen. 

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
undsoweiter (2018-11-30 22:16:26+00:00): Die Situation ist etwas kompliziert bei den Parkhäusern. Sie sind nur in der ersten Hälfte mit sichtbaren Wänden erhöht zur Oberfläche, dahinter sind sie überdeckt. Obendrauf ist ein Garten,der nach hinten über den Abhang läuft. Ich habe den sichtbaren Teil jetzt per "barrier=wall" markiert und die Dachfenster hinzugefügt.
Nmxosm (2019-03-13 21:15:58+00:00): Ich habe heute gesehen, dass die Pizzeria Jasmin wohl doch noch geöffnet hat und sie wieder aktiviert: https://osm.org/changeset/68114890

VlG Nmxosm
freebeer (2018-12-02 23:30:26+00:00): Serwoas, Lyft Team (I have not checked, I shall at the end)

Can I request that your many editors add to their OSM usernames, the suffix _lyft ?
That will make it much easier to see which edits in a series of changesets you have made when i am trying to troubleshoot problems, because i had to check around ten usernames on my first troubleshooting, only two or three i will remember today.

This not only identifies you, but it also builds up a link in me brane, such as with the several _telenav editors, many of whom i will recognise even from their private accounts.

This is not required, but with so many teams editing OSM, I am losing an overview as so many names pass in front of me.

thanks!

I am afraid that again in the edit to this northbound section of road, because of the iD bug, the route relation seen in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1109585#map=18/37.41630/-122.14676&layers=ND
was lost from this short section.

I found this by a visual inspection of the route, wanting to close the window, but wanting to make sure the whole route was intact.  I did not use any tools but eyeballs.

I do not know if you have a tool that will find an error like this yet - if so, please try it and see if it finds this.

May I repeat the suggestion that you move as quickly as possible to JOSM?  I was using iD earlier today in hopes of repairing a different relation, and it was far too limited to succeed.  But it should not have the bug of losing relations, because small edits like this are well within what iD can do.

This may not be the problem changeset, but I do not feel like again trying to find the exact source of the error :-)

And now to peek behind the curtain...
Yes, cdruck of Team Lyft, welcome to OSM and greetings to everyone else with whom i have communicated.

cheers
alexkaz (2018-12-04 00:48:16+00:00): Hi freebeer, 

we will look into adding a "_lyft" to the ids. I believe a few of our editors have already chosen to do so on their own. In the meantime, if this at all helps, here is the list of all of our editors on the Lyft OSM team. https://github.com/OSM-DCT-Lyft/US/wiki/OSM-Team-Members  This list is maintained (split into past and current mappers) and should reflect all of Lyft associated mappers at any given point of time. The repo is still a work in progress, I am working on adding a full list of projects, the training materials we are using and more on the general purpose of OSM usage at Lyft. 
We have asked our editors to halt editing ways with relations for now until we train everyone on how to edit these in JOSM. We are in the process of developing additional training material. 
Please feel free to reach out with any questions or suggestions. 

Best regards,

Alex
keithonearth (2018-11-29 20:11:43+00:00): Unusual for Nepal, that is. The forest traces here are generally very well done, far better than India.
Hjart (2018-11-29 21:55:06+00:00): Er der mulighed for at du kan finde ud af at lave lidt mere præcise/meningsfulde titler på dine changesets?
Stereo (2018-11-30 08:54:45+00:00): ;)
sergeybe (2018-11-30 02:58:09+00:00): 1. Ни в одном открытом источнике нет информации, что Никитский перевал 1443 метров. 
2. Прямо на знаке указана высота 1448: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B5_%D1%88%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B5#/media/File:Nikitskij_pass.jpg т.е.
3. Откуда данные о высоте даного перевала 1443 метров?

Есть правило в OSM называется "on ground", не вижу причины его здесь нарушать.
sergeybe (2018-12-03 15:43:36+00:00): Раз нет реакции. Возвращаю высоту и убираю седло с этой точки.
Mike4X7 (2018-11-29 20:56:31+00:00): Wrong description. Identified 3 stores and made spelling corrections.
alester (2018-11-30 06:07:57+00:00): The general rule is that the name used "on-the-ground" and/or the one most commonly known by locals should be the one used in the "name" tag. This would be Mount Newton, so I've restored that name to the "name" tag and tagged ȽÁU,WELṈEW̱ under "name:sal" (the closest related language code to SENĆOŦEN)
piterek1122 (2018-12-01 10:16:50+00:00): nie rozumiem komentarza, dobrze to zrobiłem czy źle?
Omnific (2018-11-29 21:29:04+00:00): Solid work, thanks for the additions.
Chieftl (2019-02-08 09:01:09+00:00): Добрий день
Ви позначили, що магазин ТВК "СЕЗАМ" ІФ працює цілодобово в п'ятницю.
Це дійсно так чи помилка?
mueschel (2018-11-30 11:26:00+00:00): This import created a large number of tags that shouldn't be in OSM: "telenav:action=new"
Sherbare_import (2018-11-30 18:02:54+00:00): Thank you for pointing out this mistake to me. I will be more mindful of this in the future and be sure to not upload with that tag still present. Thank you.
mueschel (2018-12-09 12:39:43+00:00): I cleaned up the remaining tags.
532910 (2019-02-18 00:07:32+00:00): Читайте вики. Это не doityourself, а radiotechnics.
mueschel (2018-12-13 11:43:05+00:00): Hi,
here I a tag Siikavuoma = yes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650796113
Could you check that?
SverigeFan (2018-12-13 22:37:59+00:00): Hi,
this was obviously a mistake, should have been "name=Siikavuoma". 
I already corrected that.
Thank you for your hint !
Greetings, Rolf (SverigeFan)
muralito (2018-11-30 13:16:56+00:00): Hola Clawchis.

Esto es solo un separador de transito, ¿porque lo cambiaste a leisure=park?
streckenkundler (2018-11-30 10:30:40+00:00): Hei,
zwei Dinge zur Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/227602

1. source:name der Relation: der Brandenburg-Viewer ist eine verbotene Quelle, er darf nicht genutzt werden.
2. indem nun die beiden Outer-Flächen an mehr als einem Punkt aneinander grenzen, ist nun der Geometriefehler "Duplicate Segment in Relation" entstanden.

Das erstere muß zwingend raus, da gibt es keinen Disskusionsspielraum, wir haben keine Nutzungrechte! 
Das zweite lässt sich heilen, indem die beiden Outer zu einer Fläche verschmolzen werden...

Sven
streckenkundler (2018-11-30 20:42:59+00:00): Ich habe beide Probleme beseitigt.
Map-Peter (2018-12-01 21:36:40+00:00): Hallo Xre90, 
bitte zukünftig einen Weg nicht einfach löschen - prüfe stattdessen ob "disused:" oder z.B. "removed: passt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix 
Hier habe ich das gerade angepasst. 
Gruß Peter
mueschel (2018-11-30 11:25:57+00:00): This import created a large number of tags that shouldn't be in OSM: "telenav:action=new"
The Mapgician_import (2018-11-30 17:51:31+00:00): Hi mueschel, 
Thanks for pointing that out to me. I have made the changes necessary to get rid of those.
aceman444 (2020-11-30 23:16:37+00:00): Zdravim, prosim piste zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn) ako "update". Dakujem
Danysan95 (2018-11-30 18:19:43+00:00): Il percorso pedonale che hai aggiunto ([1]) parte da Via Matteotti e quindi dovrebbe intersecarlo (dovrebbero avere un nodo in comune), ma non lo fa. Questo andrebbe corretto.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650818760
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65028093
Danysan95 (2018-11-30 17:37:01+00:00): Quando due percorsi si incrociano fisicamente devono condividere un nodo. La pista ciclabile che hai modificato ([1]) interseca quattro vie (Fermi, Kennedy, Cervi, Romagnoli) senza condividere nessun nodo. Questo andrebbe risolto.

Inoltre hai spostato due indirizzi ([2] Via Fermi 12/1 e [3] Via Kennedy 28c) in posizioni strane. Li hai spostati per errore?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117741707
[2]https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4771093053
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4771092517
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65028148
woodpeck (2018-12-06 12:30:12+00:00): Hello stadiaarcadia, I am currently investigating a bunch of bad edits in Ayodhya and I noticed that you made a lot of changes here. How did you become aware of the area - are you using some sort of quality control tool? I notice that you are mapping around the world, always with a changeset comment of "Missing buildings added." even if you, like in this changeset, make a lot of other changes as well. I'd like to understand how you are working.
stadiaarcadia (2018-12-06 14:53:23+00:00): Hi woodpeck, I just checked some random large metropolitan areas in the world. Some cities / regions do or did have pretty much errors and missing buildings. I like to help develop some of the OSM maps around the world, especially the ones which are the most “underdeveloped”.
RAC_UK (2018-11-30 09:38:50+00:00): Hi ndrw6,

Are you just adding postcode centroids or have will you complete the rest of the data later?

Regards 

RAC_UK
user_5173844 (2018-11-30 10:04:16+00:00): Yes, these are just code centroids. I have no data for the remaining postcodes. Sometimes they can be guessed/extrapolated from street names and centroids but in general local knowledge is needed to do it correctly and legally.

At present, our coverage of unique code points is pretty poor (currently stands at 11%) so adding even one object per code point has a value in itself.

BTW, nice work in Wellingborough. Try this map paint style to see the postcodes more clearly.
https://pastebin.com/raw/RxKNky3E
RAC_UK (2018-11-30 16:32:24+00:00): Hi,

Some of the centroids may need to be changed after a survey. For example the building you have added as NN8 4GX is not visible on the ground, the post code seems to be for the first floor of the row of shops that have the post code NN8 4PG.
Jørn-osm (2018-12-02 21:04:13+00:00): Der er adresser hvor det supplerendebynavn mangler i osm.
Det ligner det er når det supplerendebynavn er ligmed navnet på postnummer.
Her er det Glostrup der mangler.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6104579487
http://danmarksadresser.dk/danmarks-adresser/0/42?x=12.425884628679919&y=55.682507&zoom=10

Se også:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64805864
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64895920

Der findes andre eksempler med samme mangel.
osmviborg (2018-12-03 06:29:08+00:00): Det er et bevist valg fra programmørens side.
//in some places in DAR, the supplerende bynavn is set even though it is equal to the postnummer navn. Let's remove that.
bhavyakota (2019-04-26 07:05:51+00:00): Hi Buditux,

Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 601857517
way 601857515
way 650828988
way 601857512"
way 537150857
classified as Secondary. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Service' as it is lrading to Aiport. Please Share your inputs on this
Thanks in Advance.
freebeer (2019-01-11 07:04:08+00:00): Bom dia,
Did you intend to map the former silo in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650835778 in some sort of `after' state and leave it up to the viewer to form an office pool to guess what happened and decide which lifecycle prefix is most suitable?
Just idly curious, thanksz
Wall Beds & Bespoke Furniture (2018-11-30 01:48:18+00:00): Remove JF Kitchen - Business closed down two years ago.
demon_box (2018-11-30 21:46:13+00:00): ciao, scusa ma tu dici "Impianto sciistico in previsione" è quindi ancora soltanto sulla carta oppure è in costruzione? è ben diverso! fammi sapere xchè fa una bella differenza, grazie.
--enrico
gurglypipe (2018-11-30 10:23:28+00:00): Are you copying data from an OS walking map? For tedious licensing reasons, that’s not allowed (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_Opendata for the list of OS data we *are* allowed to use in OpenStreetMap). If you copy data from OS walking maps, you risk all your edits being reverted in order to keep OSM’s licensing correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65030319
lostmike (2018-11-30 11:34:12+00:00): In addition the OSM maps are rarely accurate.  In my experience they can be off by tens of metres. Mapping by walking and recording with a GPS is the only accurate way to map paths.
gurglypipe (2018-11-30 11:37:21+00:00): (Note: This changeset only changed the designation of the existing mapped path. Having been here myself many times, the path definitely exists on the ground, and existed in OSM prior to this edit.)
lakedistrict (2018-11-30 11:38:30+00:00): Hi Mark, welcome to OSM. If you want to add public right of way designations you can use http://www.mapthepaths.org.uk/?lat=54.53573328463213&lon=-3.0351912060142023&zoom=1 . Please don't copy them from OS maps. You can also use any of the imagery/data layers in the iD editor (including the GPS traces) as well as your own knowledge and surveys/photos. Any questions just ask.
Mark Edmonds (2018-11-30 16:51:00+00:00): Apologies, yes it was just a change of designation (based on what is shown on the Ordnance Survey mapping - which I may have wrongly assumed was the correct authority). There are 2 roughly parallel paths - one a public bridleway and one not. When I hike here I've never had to worry about which is which before! But started doing some cycling recently and so was checking this route to make sure I don't use a path I'm not supposed to, and that routing will keep me on the right one! According to the Ordnance Survey map the public bridleway was the one of the 2 paths furthest from the edge, whereas OpenStreetMap had the bridleway closest to the edge, so I swapped the designations round. I will also check out mapthepaths.org.uk now. Thanks for the help :)
APM39 (2018-11-30 20:52:24+00:00): Hehe, this is isn't Wausau!
MidwestMapGeek (2018-12-21 19:26:26+00:00): Yeah, every once in a while I forget to change my changeset comment before I save. #oops
gurglypipe (2018-11-30 10:11:43+00:00): As far as I’m aware, foot/bicycle/horse=designated implies access=yes, but also means that that’s the intended user of the track. Why change this, out of interest?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65030650
Mark Edmonds (2018-11-30 16:39:47+00:00): I was just checking the public bridleway along here and noticed this was set to designated access - differently from all the other parts. Reading the OSM wiki I had a slightly different impression of what "designated" means - it specifically mentions signage to indicate the users who a path is for. I don't remember one there, but I can check. Whereas for a public bridleway access is guaranteed by law. It probably doesn't matter much either way (for routing), so probably was an unnecessary change, but it matches the rest of the public bridleway now.
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-30 05:23:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65032395 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed smash-tagging, please see talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Rich1234 (2018-11-30 04:11:51+00:00): Hi.  Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Note that your new crossing, where it intersects with the Eskridge Road way, should connect to Eskridge Road with a common node, and the node should be labeled with a highway=crossing tag.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways in the section on "crossing ways" and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing for the highway=crossing tag for nodes).
DaveF (2018-11-30 19:30:28+00:00): You could have used the 'straight ahead only' rule. 4 rels instead of 8.
gseethar (2018-12-03 10:22:24+00:00): Hi DaveF,

Yes, though it makes sense to give a "Straight Ahead only" than restrictions for both left and right, We will be able to give restrictions only based on the signs available (Which restricts left and right).

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Ganesh
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
freebeer (2018-11-30 20:02:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65056334 where the changeset comment is: OSM is not a paintbox, but a serious mapping project.  Please draw only what exists in real life, else your changes will be reverted as vandalism
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
freebeer (2018-11-30 20:00:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65056283 where the changeset comment is: OSM is not a paintbox, but a serious mapping project.  Please draw only what exists in real life, else your changes will be reverted as vandalism
Fauzan IRM-ED (2022-12-01 02:34:49+00:00): Hi R Iyer , thank you for your mapping contribution!
Your edit looks awesome, but I need to readjust your building based on the imagery. (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/650895591)
Thank you and happy mapping.
(https://maproulette.org/challenge/30233/task/142649664)
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].