piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ZondeR (2022-10-16 18:49:03+00:00): Bonjour Antoine, tu as bien fait de faire le revert, je n'étais pas au courant de ça.
Est-ce que tu as une référence qui parle de la cartographie des trottoirs et de leur intérêt?
naomap (2022-10-17 07:01:26+00:00): La page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Trottoirs est un bon point de départ. L'intérêt de cartographier précisément les trottoirs est qu'OSM est utilisé pour faire du calcul d'itinéraires pour les piétons, éventuellement en prenant en compte des contraintes notamment les personnes se déplaçant en fauteuil (même si beaucoup reste à faire dans ce domaine).
Carto_Graph (2022-09-28 14:11:48+00:00): Здесь нужно добавить не название, а amenity=parking.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
ElliottPlack (2023-02-11 02:50:48+00:00): This was not a cleanup, but rather a full scale replacement with invalid data. It appears that the source was highly generalized and this erases much of the work by other editors.
ElliottPlack (2023-02-18 00:58:45+00:00): The problem is that you've deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127673486 and replaced it with a set of new pipelines of unknown source. The previous version was traced from aerials and field surveyed in places. Your recent version lists only Bing as a source. Are you saying you could tell the locations of four parallel underground pipes based on imagery? This is why you are blocked, this constitutes an import, regardless of whether you "hand verified" each point. The point of the import process is for the community to review the source. Had you simply modified the existing pipeline to be more correct based on your source, this would not appear as an import, but the wholesale deletion of others work and replacing it without consideration is intolerable.

Discuss the source of these edits with the community in the required fashion, e.g., in a public forum such as the imports-us mailing list, and then the DWG will consider lifting your 10-year ban.

-- Elliott  
OSMF Data Working Group
srbrook (2022-09-28 17:02:30+00:00): noticed this yesterday you may want to take a look at other work by newbe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/James%20Bradshaw where he had added cycleways over other highways
BCNorwich (2022-09-28 17:27:12+00:00): Hi srbrook,
I got called away this morning, I think all the duplicates are now removed.  I've commented to the new mapper.

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2022-09-28 13:14:20+00:00): Hello. 

I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.
Please be more accurate and don't cross buildings or other features when you map highways and residential areas.
tagging of highways
 
 African countries:
 Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries


Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126728632
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Langlaeufer (2022-09-28 11:34:30+00:00): Hi,
auch bei Fußwegen, wenn separat eingezeichnent dann sidewalk=separate

Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126729135
J0N45 (2022-09-28 11:49:06+00:00): Hi,
oh ja, da hatte ich übersehen, dass die Fußwege bereits separat eingezeichnet waren. Die Anzeige der Wege hatte sich bei StreetComplete anscheinend überlappt. Da muss ich wohl etwas achtsamer sein 😅
Danke für fixen!
GEO ECLA (2022-10-11 09:58:03+00:00): Merci pour votre première contribution. Je me suis permis de préciser le type d'établissement, d'ajouter des informations de contact, des horaires d'ouverture et de repositionner le point à l'intérieur du bâtiment.
Bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap !
Frans S (2022-09-28 09:29:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
You asked for a review.
Please keep in mind that the roads you map should connect isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and so on.
The roads you mapped here are just for local use as access to woods and field. Not important and necessary.
Also, the quality of the road makes sense.
A tag Highway=unclassified is the lowest ranking tag and can be as wide that a car (4wheel) can pass. The tracks you mapped here are less than 1 mtr wide.  Path should be a better tag. 
Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries

How to measure the witdh of a road
Zoom in (Ideditor) as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126730501
kenken234 (2022-09-28 09:21:15+00:00): Added based on satellite image
Frans S (2022-09-28 09:41:21+00:00): Hello. A few more issues

Short roads leading to a single building or business do not need to be mapped if they can be seen from the main road.
When a road continues outside the task square you are working on, continue that road over the border. The mapper on that other task can continue mapping that road. If the road is already mapped on the adjacent task, connect the roads.
You often did not connect roads to each other
Gaps between roads prevent GPS systems from working properly. So connect all roads where possible.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126731098
LuxuryCoop (2022-09-28 10:35:37+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
aceman444 (2026-01-17 13:32:26+00:00): I think all the garages have a flat roof, not skillion. If there is some very slight slope towards the back of the building, it should be specified more precisely e.g. using roof:angle.
silversurfer83 (2022-09-29 15:07:36+00:00): Hi
wie ist dieser Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863676251) denn beschildert?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126731701
keep_on_moving (2022-09-29 16:46:54+00:00): Hi silversurfer83,
bin den Weg mit dem Rad abgefahren - ist ein Privatweg. Einen Straßennamen gibt es nicht. Am Beginn ist Hinweis.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126731701
silversurfer83 (2022-09-29 18:17:00+00:00): Ok
Der tag "access=private" bedeutet, dass du mit deinem Rad (oder auch zu Fuß) gar nicht entlang darfst. Sagt das Schild das?
Oder geht es eher darum, dass sich die Stadt Bad Wildungen nicht um diesen Weg kümmert und der Zugang nur für den Kraftverkehr auf Anwohner und Lieferanten eingeschränkt ist?
keep_on_moving (2022-09-30 08:01:38+00:00): Wie kann man denn den Zugang Privatgrundstück kennzeichnen?
Dort steht ein Schild des (wohl des Grundstückseigentümers), damit jeder erkennt, dass es sich nicht um einen öffentlichen Weg handelt.
Ob es grundsätzlich erlaubt ist Privatgrundstücke zu befahren oder nicht, dass weiß ich allerdings nicht.
silversurfer83 (2022-10-02 08:01:06+00:00): Moin
War zufällig in der Nähe. Ist ja tatsächlich ein Privatgrundstück und dein Tag dürfte vollkommen korrekt sein :)
Grüße
Frans S (2022-09-28 13:09:35+00:00): Hello.  
HellO
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.
Your mapping and tagging is not in according to the OSM standards
Please read my comment which I send on your changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126731783
abakus_uploader (2022-09-28 22:31:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
edytor008 (2022-09-29 09:24:11+00:00): Coś poszło nie tak. Poprawiono.
numbertheory2357 (2022-09-28 09:51:20+00:00): Unfortunately I did not change the name of the changeset, it is still the name of my last change set. The new name would be:
"Added Make and Bake for Pets store"
Jrachi (2022-10-14 17:18:05+00:00): Ciao.
Mi dici gentilmente da dove hai ricavato tutte queste stazioni di ricarica?
I commenti al changeset (quando fai l'upload) servono per evitare discussioni e fornire informazioni utili a tutti.
David Evangelista (2022-10-14 20:22:18+00:00): queste stazioni di ricarica fanno parte di un circuito di valore creato da Repower, abbiamo accesso alla posizione esatta di tutti questi punti direttamente dalla fonte.
Jrachi (2022-10-15 15:56:36+00:00): Significa che Repower ha rilasciato i dati con licenza compatibile con Openstreetmap?
Se così, perché solo le ricariche per e-bike?
Repower non ha anche ricariche per type2?
David Evangelista (2022-10-15 19:41:18+00:00): Non possiamo escludere che in futuro caricheranno anche quelle. il nostro rapporto con loro riguarda il solo progetto legato agli strumenti per e-bike
Jrachi (2022-10-15 21:04:57+00:00): Grazie.
La mancanza di dati sulle ricariche EV su OSM, se non quelle fornite dai volontari che ci capitano, è vergognoso.
I fornitori di energia elettrica hanno i loro database che forniscono solo alle app proprietarie.
Fa piacere che almeno Repower cerca, lentamente di colmare la mancanza di dati ufficiale.
Chiudo chiedendoti di seguire i suggerimenti che ti vengono forniti dai mappatori anziani.
Name, operator e network, servono sopratutto a fornire dati utilizzabili dai fornitori di servizi.

Ivo, Jrachi
ivanbranco (2022-10-15 21:44:02+00:00): Ciao, scusate se mi intrometto, ma visto che David sembri saperne di piu' provo a chiedertelo direttamente. 

Ho letto le caratteristiche delle stazioni di ricarica qua: https://www.repower.com/it/dina/

Sai per caso se queste caratteristiche si applicano a TUTTE le colonnine di ricarica del network? In tal caso si potrebbe fare un'aggiunta automatica di:
-capacity=4
-socket:schuko=4
-socket:schuko:voltage=230

Grazie :)
David Evangelista (2022-10-16 07:03:18+00:00): Ciao, in realtà non tutti gli strumenti di ricarica facenti parte del network sono DINA (ce ne sono alcuni di generazione precedente), e alcuni operatori ne hanno più di uno. Questo rende difficoltoso il dettaglio della capacity, mentre sicuramente il voltaggio è quello standard per tutte.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-30 21:10:56+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
user_5359 (2022-09-29 10:37:17+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10058213566. What is the meaning of the foreign tags:
elevation = 662.7
osmand:address = بالقرب من درب الهرنيات, الأجفر
osmand:background = circle
osmand:color = #d00d0d
osmand:icon = special_subway
time = 2022-03-24T14:52:18Z
?
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-08 06:24:06+00:00): Surface asphalt, aber grade2, ist das Absicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56039530
PiaVespRoll (2024-09-08 13:55:05+00:00): wie grade2? Komme ich leider nicht mit.
PiaVespRoll (2024-09-08 13:59:19+00:00): Habs Korrigiert, war Straße was ich gesehen habe.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-28 22:31:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
nyampire (2022-09-29 06:12:42+00:00): OSMへようこそ！編集をレビューしました。

それなりの数のポイントを削除されているのですが、この削除したポイントは、現在本当に「存在しなくなった」場所でしょうか？

お寺なども含まれていて、なかなか実際になくなってしまうことは稀なのではないか、と感じています。
OpenStreetMapは、場所に関する情報をみんなで共有するデータセットです。Google Mymapのように、個人向けに提供されるものではありません。

もし編集が間違いであれば、巻き戻しの処理を行いますので、ご連絡ください。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126733354
nyampire (2022-10-01 23:01:55+00:00): リバートしました　https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126875682
Владимир К (2022-12-19 15:30:34+00:00): Добрый день!
не надо давать описательные названия
BobKo (2022-12-19 15:56:43+00:00): Что я сделал не так?
Владимир К (2022-12-19 17:10:26+00:00): название лишнее, я убрал
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
BobKo (2022-12-20 15:58:53+00:00): Ок, спасибо за помощь!
Frans S (2022-10-03 08:05:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
You make a writing error.  hagway instead of highway. Does not exist,  I correct them on this changeset.
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126733631
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 13:17:54+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126718692
eggie (2022-09-28 10:53:58+00:00): Beste Avery..
Gebruik svp de adresnodes om op bij te taggen.
Houd ook het gebied van je edits veel kleiner.
	Groenhart Group BV. doet niet in OSM zonder aanvillende info  bv office=company. 
Best actueel, maar.. 
Gebouwen kun je laten importeren via het forum van OSM. We tekenen niet zelf in.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-28 11:01:16+00:00): Als voorbeeld hoe zo iets gaat een importverzoek gedaan
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=872674#p872674
Groet
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 13:22:00+00:00): I think that more standard surface=woodchips would be better

Can I change it?
kevjs1982 (2022-10-06 18:30:16+00:00): Yeah that's fine, josm filled in the non-plural version in error
sorcrosc (2022-09-28 17:40:16+00:00): Ciao.
Al centro della rotatoria c'è un paletto con le frecce di direzione. Credo sia meglio mappata come way (non mini_roundabout)
Dino Michelini (2022-09-29 07:38:43+00:00): Prima avevo lasciato la rotonda inserendo una uscita che mancava, poi consultando la wiki di OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout ho fatto la modifica perché mi sembra più coerente con la wiki. Che ne pensi? Si può anche ripristinare la rotatoria (forse aiuta durante la guida con navigatore) ma sostanzialmente le cose non cambiano molto; certo è che in quell’incrocio l’Amministrazione avrebbe fatto meglio ha costruire una vera rotatoria di modo da separare i flussi dei veicoli. Ragionaci e poi decidi se ripristinare la rotonda. Ciao
sorcrosc (2022-09-29 20:05:03+00:00): È una vera rotatoria infatti :) Non sembrerebbe dalle immagini aeree e in effetti i cordoli sono bassi e ci si potrebbe passare sopra, se non fosse per i paletti che ci sono sia al centro che nel mezzo delle vie di entrata/uscita. Puoi vederla anche su Mapillary se ti va.
Uno di questi giorni ci passo e controllo che è ancora così, poi penso che ripristinerò.
Ciao
Geim (2022-09-28 10:53:57+00:00): Hoi Leo

Dit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3376936#map=19/51.44756/5.68461&layers=N is een G12a geworden
https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2020-8800.html
Leo Slager (2022-09-28 11:09:18+00:00): Aha, Ja zover terug had ik nog niet gezocht.
Bedankt.

En ook nog Capelle en Helmond in 1 changeset. Slechte beurt van mij.
Zal de leeftijd zijn :-)
Geim (2022-09-28 12:13:07+00:00): Leeftijd, beginnen we daar allemaal niet last van te krijgen?
Frans S (2022-09-28 13:05:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most roads.
Please tag the roads in urban areas as highway= residential.
 African countries:
 Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126734825
SekeRob (2022-09-28 18:10:01+00:00): Hi,

Before your changed the building shape it was semi square with a 'no reason' spike and after even less since the spike node should have been removed, not the south wall moved to the spike node. The building is actually square, so I corrected with this https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=126734869

Kindly, when correcting use at least the 'The Q' key and look if the shape is fair, else what's the point of any correction ;O). 

Just saying.

PS most all the buildings around that zone are poorly drawn, cause probably because the mapper did not consider the angle from which the sat image was shot.
Mini_music (2022-09-30 10:38:49+00:00): Hi SekeRob, thank you for making these corrections!
Forest Town Nature Conservation Group (2022-09-28 11:00:55+00:00): For an overlay comparing the current OpenStretMap definition of Spa Ponds and the actual ownership boundary of Spa Ponds in cyan see: https://foresttown.net/nature/Spa_Ponds_Overlay.png (also includes Spa Lane to the north, which is a path to the reserve)
SK53 (2022-09-28 17:21:17+00:00): Hi,

I'll take a closer look later tonight. The online editor does slightly odd things if you try & rearrange areas which are meant to avoid bigger issues, but can be pretty puzzling at first impressions.

SK53
Frans S (2022-09-28 13:03:12+00:00): Hello  I review mappings on this project.
Please read my comments on a PM I send you.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126735155
marczoutendijk (2022-09-30 08:01:36+00:00): The way you draw buildings is extremely sloppy, can you improve on that? 
Is this really a triangular building?
Do you know how to square buildings?
What do you mean by "community osm"?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
JeroenvanderGun (2022-10-02 23:10:22+00:00): I reverted this change, multiple government sources (BAG, NWB) confirm street name is Wezelpad.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-03 05:23:39+00:00): Thank you for your correction.
BáthoryPéter (2023-02-17 09:29:04+00:00): Ezt a Knowledge Graph ID-t hogyan lehet használni? Nem igazán találok hozzá public API-t.
City-busz (2023-02-17 12:49:31+00:00): Szia!

Ezt az ID-t a Google használja az egyes helyek és fogalmak azonosítására. Például ezen a linken megjelenik a Ritz-Carlton szálloda Google-oldala, ahol lehet látni a hely adatait, véleményt írni stb.:
https://g.co/kg/g/1hc4fc972

Google-keresésnél ezek az adatok a jobb oldalpanelen jelennek meg. Az ID például ezzel a JavaScript-kóddal nyerhető ki azokon a Google keresőoldalakon, ahol megjelenik oldalpanel:
document.body.textContent.match(/,1349,0]','[^']+','\[null,\\x22(\/[^\\]*)\\x22/)[1]

Ezt az ID-t a Wikidata is gyűjti:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P2671
BáthoryPéter (2023-02-17 12:55:17+00:00): Köszi a gyors választ, így már érthető.

Matrix chaten volt egy kis tanácstalanság a taggel kapcsolatban.
matteo564 (2022-10-14 14:23:45+00:00): Buongiorno, sarebbero graditi commenti ai changeset più specifici e informativi, grazie e buon lavoro.
dieterdreist (2022-10-14 16:10:59+00:00): grazie, capisco che possono sembrare quasi identici, ma in realtà descrivono proprio quello che faccio: inserisco itinerari (sentieri) nella Regione Valle D'Aosta. Il numero del sentiero è alla fine del commento. Talvolta faccio edit "intorno al sentiero" che sono comunque generalmente legati al sentiero e i suoi dintorni. C'era qualcosa che non adava bene? Se dovessi aver trovato un problema sarei interessato a saperlo, così correggo, grazie.

Saluti,
Martin
matteo564 (2022-10-14 16:28:39+00:00): Va benissimo, non avevo notato (cosa che può sfuggire anche ad altri), quindi consiglierei proprio per questo di differenziarli e magari specificare se vengono inseriti altri elementi, se vengono fatte correzioni, collegamenti, modifiche, aggiunte, se non c'è niente di particolare un'idea potrebbe essere inserire i punti iniziali e finali del percorso o quelli toccati...ecc; ogni modifica ha il suo motivo e una sua particolarità, è quella che secondo me dovrebbe essere fatta emergere, senza fare un poema, a grandi linee la zona e cosa si e' fatto che fa la differenza dagli altri changeset. Apprezzo molto che i changeset non siano di moltissimi elementi e che non coprano un' area troppo estesa
Cordialmente, Matteo
aixbrick (2022-09-28 15:53:24+00:00): Hallo,
eine Bitte: Nach Möglichkeit den vorhandenen Grundriss korrigieren, um die Historie zu erhalten. Durch das Löschen und Neueinzeichnen sieht es sonst so aus, als wenn hier vorher nichts gewesen ist.
Gruß
Peer van Daalen (2022-09-29 06:48:21+00:00): Stimmt! Hatte ich vergessen. Pardon!
Peer