piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
b-jazz (2018-10-26 05:49:24+00:00): I noticed something interesting about the buildings that you are creating. They often have a node in the middle of a straight segment and that node is duplicated in place which triggers validation errors in OSM Inspector. You might want to see if you can prevent this from happening in your editor or double check after you create buildings and clean them up.
b-jazz (2018-10-26 05:51:19+00:00): For instance, see v1 of  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636085409 and nodes 5998800364 and 5998811585.
bxl-forever (2018-12-08 20:28:23+00:00): Hello,
Yes, I think it was necessary to change this.
Incidently, I passed by this area a few days ago and saw the sign when entering the path from Ch. de Wavre/Stwg op Waver.  It is a F99 with only foot and bicycle categories → it should be highway=footway+bicycle=yes (or highway=cycleway+foot=yes), and certainly not legally open to horses.
What do you think?
Phil_Bxl (2018-12-12 17:02:58+00:00): Hello,
Normaly, the connections between the cycleway and the roads are corrected.

For the "F99" and the horses access on these paths... I don't know specifically what the laws. But, practically it's not a horsepath because there is a portico (portique) that limits the crossing height rue du Sceptre
Have a nice day,
Philippe
Hjart (2018-10-19 18:54:25+00:00): Jeg har tilføjet shop=supermarket tag til Rema 1000 og lavet en række tilføjelser til shelterplads + omgivelser.
praeteritum (2023-08-26 14:49:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140415235.
geoaria (2019-05-20 12:05:01+00:00): سلام
باسپاس از ترسیم مسیر جدید ، با توجه به عدم تعیین جهت حرکت ، اصلاح شد.  جاده اردستان اصفهان
ebraplmap (2019-05-20 15:51:40+00:00): سپاسگزارم
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-11-14 16:03:05+00:00): Andrei você transofrmou aqui rodovias pavimentadas em track, porque fez isso?  Exemplo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636088485/history Já corrigi este
pio2_122 (2018-10-19 19:35:35+00:00): Ekhm... Był jakiś powód, dlaczego usunąłem ABW z tego miejsca....
"WYDZIAŁ ZAMIEJSCOWY W SZCZECINIE DELEGATURY ABW W GDAŃSKU
Adres:
ul. Małopolska 15
70-515 Szczecin"

https://bip.abw.gov.pl/bip/dane-teleadresowe/46,Dane-teleadresowe.html
pio2_122 (2018-10-19 19:36:56+00:00): Swoją drogą, skąd miałeś takie informacje, że tutaj jest biuro ABW?
JulesGabrielVerne (2018-10-20 10:50:52+00:00): Byłem na miejscu :) czerwona tabliczka urządowa wisi
pio2_122 (2018-10-20 10:56:43+00:00): Hmm... ciekawa sprawa! Może jakaś pół-tajna baza...
Na Street View faktycznie jest tabliczka, ale budynek w środku pusty.
JulesGabrielVerne (2018-10-20 10:58:32+00:00): kurde, może coś źle spojrzałem. Idę dzisiaj na przejażdzę rowerową to podjadę i potwierdze, bo może pobieżnie spojrzałem :)
pio2_122 (2018-10-20 11:10:07+00:00): Chwała za zaangażowanie! Ogromne dzięki.
pio2_122 (2018-10-27 11:23:02+00:00): I jak?
JulesGabrielVerne (2018-10-27 11:24:00+00:00): Jest na miejscu :)
pio2_122 (2018-10-27 11:29:04+00:00): Łoł, ciekawe. Jak jest fizycznie na miejscu, to niech będzie :D
praeteritum (2023-08-25 05:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140351256.
eggie (2018-10-19 20:27:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-19 20:32:59+00:00): Dag TLC, Een adres hoort niet nog een keer een adres te krijgen. Adressen zijn al aanwezig op de adresnode van het Kadaster.
Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd.
Wanneer de naam van het gebouw Q52 is kan het op het gebouw blijven staan.
Waarom geen TP10?
MVG,
Eggie
twoleggedcreature (2018-10-20 13:01:01+00:00): Ah, excuseer. Het was niet mijn bedoeling het gebouw te hernoemen. Het gebouw is in handen geweest van KPN en heette toen idd TP10. Nu heeft het die naam niet meer en zijn er andere bedrijven in gevestigd. Waaronder ons bedrijf: Q42.
eggie (2018-10-20 14:02:32+00:00): Oke.. Ik pas het aan. Het bedrijf komt op de adresnode. 
Bedankt voor je reactie
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-20 14:09:15+00:00): Bedrijf staat nu op nr 14. 
office=company
name=Q42
Wanneer meer bedrijven van die node gebruik willen maken wordt het lastig en kunnen de bedrijven beter als losse nodes worden toegevoegd.
Evt. kan website= en phone=+31... worden toegevoegd.
twoleggedcreature (2018-10-20 14:53:37+00:00): Dank. Ik heb geloof ik nog niet helemaal door hoe de nodes werken ed. Vergt dus wat studie ipv intuïtief een bijdrage leveren ;-)
eggie (2018-10-20 15:01:18+00:00): Het ijkt erg gemakkelijk, maar het is het zeker niet :)
eggie (2018-10-20 15:29:39+00:00): De "l" op mn toetsenbord idemdito :)
Константин Гам (2018-10-25 13:46:55+00:00): Вы уверены что тут установлен знак "Движение на велосипеде запрещено"?
aceman444 (2018-10-22 21:58:51+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za doplnenie objektov Inchebe.

Ale aky typ bariery je napr.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5998948075 ? barrier=yes na bodoch mimo cesty je dost k nicomu.

Podobne, co znamena access=permissive na parkovisku
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5998948034 ? Aky je tam pristup?

Dakujem
Rick Richards (2018-10-23 17:39:27+00:00): Zdravím,

bariéru som opravil (umiestnil ju na chodník).

Prístup som zmenil na permit, kedže tam môžu parkovať len ľudia s povolením, pokiaľ teda viem.
aceman444 (2018-10-23 20:35:44+00:00): Dakujem
V tom pripade prosim pouzite 'private', 'permit' je neznama nedokumentovana hodnota. Tiez prosim rozlisujte ci tam len nemozu parkovat vozidla (potom vehicle=private), alebo naozaj tam nesmu ist aj chodci (potom by bolo access=private). Ale na zakaz chodcov by tam musela byt tabula "sukromny pozemok" alebo nieco take. Aj ked teda suhlasim, ze pri bodovom objekte je to takmer jedno :) Keby ste parkovisko zakreslili plochou a pripadne aj s cestami tak by ten rozdiel bol dolezity, lebo napr. by chodci mohli po tych cestach prechadzat na nejake miesto za parkoviskom.
Dakujem
Rick Richards (2018-10-24 11:31:10+00:00): Rozumiem, ďakujem za upozornenie :-)
Rodrigo Rega (2018-10-20 19:32:26+00:00): Hola David,

Taberna de Xesús ya estaba en el mapa. Supongo que los mapas que usas de maps.me no estaban actualizados y no te salía en la aplicación. He eliminado el duplicado y he pasado al que ya estaba tus nuevas etiquetas.
fmarier (2018-10-20 04:24:05+00:00): Hey,

I think it's possible your OSM app wasn't up-to-date when you added MEC because it's already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5902494685

I have removed the duplicate entry.

Cheers,
Francois
Signal Wolf (2018-10-22 21:05:19+00:00): Thanks!
datendelphin (2018-11-04 14:01:03+00:00): und die Wälder verbessert, sehr schön :)
Glassman (2018-10-19 23:11:25+00:00): Tip: the tag service_time= should be service_time=Su 09:30;Su 10:45
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63691157
Fischkopp0815 (2018-10-20 08:27:11+00:00): Mapbox ist hier veraltet (Stand 2012). Dadurch hast Du das Gebäude wieder auf den alten Stand vor dem Neubau gebracht. Der Neubau wurde im Apr. 2014 eröffnet.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22318306

https://www.amrum-news.de/2014/04/25/lichtblick-inselkino-amrum-hat-wieder-ein-kino/
Fischkopp0815 (2018-10-20 13:04:50+00:00): Falscher Link. Richtig ist
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223183061
Fischkopp0815 (2018-10-20 17:18:33+00:00): Ich habe die Gebäudeänderung rückgängig gemacht und noch etwas modifiziert
Discostu36 (2018-10-21 19:43:31+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.
maraf24 (2018-11-11 11:37:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88408920/history
Na jakiej podstawie to kasowanie?
philippec (2019-10-25 12:28:41+00:00): Is het drinkwater indoor en 24/7 ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5999042706#map=19/50.83019/2.70116
robbieonsea (2019-10-26 16:12:07+00:00): I placed the node outside; thus the drinking fountain is available 24/7.
philippec (2019-10-26 17:39:53+00:00): Thank you, but most mappers cannot be trusted to map correctly.
philippec (2019-10-26 18:08:10+00:00): And many drinking water fountains in my country cannot be trusted to function.
philippec (2020-03-05 21:48:44+00:00): And did it work ?
robbieonsea (2020-03-06 01:13:51+00:00): I don't think I used it, but IIRC it looked fairly new.
philippec (2021-02-20 09:03:48+00:00): I visited it yesterday.
eggie (2018-10-20 07:25:11+00:00): Dag Dutur.. ziet er allemaal netjes uit.
MVG,
Eggie
Commodoortje (2018-10-22 02:44:14+00:00): Het pad eindigt nu op de rand van het gras. Het heeft (nog) geen verbinding met de Wolstraat. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5999072207
Mikel Ortega (2018-10-19 21:29:48+00:00): Testing: https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes
tux67 (2018-10-22 09:02:15+00:00): Schau dir hier nochmal den Overlap von Park, Parkplatz und Parkplatzwegen an. der Park sollte nicht "durch" den Parkplatz laufen. Und bitte nicht die Landuses miteinander oder den Wegen verkleben.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63692100
Константин Гам (2019-04-18 15:47:50+00:00): Пожалуйста отмечая тропу в лесу не надо выдумывать ей из ни откуда свойства и вешать несуществующее название.
Johnny Mapperseed (2018-10-19 21:50:40+00:00): Forgot to change changeset comment. This was an armchair edit from sat imagery
tux67 (2018-10-22 08:59:42+00:00): Den neu hinzugefügten Fluss hast du teilweise mit dem Landuse "verklebt" (aud eine Linie gelegt). Das is extrem wartungsunfreundlich und nicht so anzuwenden (Gilt auch für Straßen und Landuse). Wenn ein Weg deinen Fluß kreuzt, musst du dort auch eine Brücke einfügen. Beides habe ich jetzt gefixed ..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63692440
simon484 (2018-10-22 21:44:46+00:00): Ok Danke .
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-31 11:04:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64041921 where the changeset comment is: Revert pseudo parks added by simon484
chnav (2018-10-20 09:13:21+00:00): Здравствуйте, у нас не викимапия, поэтому пожалуйста не пишите оценочные и описательные фразы в названиях "хорошее пиво" и т.д. Спасибо.
Leo Slager (2018-10-20 14:33:41+00:00): It is not usefull to tag the name of the busstop twice.
So I will remove your contributions.
Leo Slager (2018-10-20 14:39:14+00:00): All 10 of your changesets will be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-31 11:04:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64041921 where the changeset comment is: Revert pseudo parks added by simon484
Phyks (2018-10-20 08:50:49+00:00): Salut,

Pourquoi avoir supprimé le passage piéton https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/683074996 ?

C'est loin d'être le seul annoté comme ça dans le quartier et ça me semble correct. Par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/683077529.
Truchin (2018-10-20 10:27:39+00:00): Probablement parce qu'il était dans l'axe de la piste cyclable et pas du passage piéton et que je ne l'ai pas recréé ensuite. Dans l'absolu, il devrait être disjoint de la piste cyclable car il y a aussi des passages piétons de traversée de piste cyclable
Phyks (2018-10-21 09:07:29+00:00): Je l'ai recréé ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6002244612 du coup, sur la rue Cacheux.

Par contre, je me demande s'il ne devrait pas être quand même dans l'axe de la piste cyclable. Ce n'est pas le seul dans ce cas sur cette piste cyclable, voir notamment https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1871320342.

Et le passage piéton pourrait dans l'absolu être vu comme vélo + piétons avec un segregated. Non ?
Truchin (2018-10-22 14:18:47+00:00): Dans la continuité d'une piste cyclable clairement identifié comme telle (avec un way spécifique) je trouve que c'est gênant car on ne sait pas trop si le passage piéton s'adresse aux piétons qui traversent la piste ou aux piétons qui traversent la voie.
Par contre, pour une traversée contiguë au passage piéton (permettant au cycliste de n'avoir pas à mettre pied à terre) et sans highway=cycleway, c'est plus pertinent
Parzelle13 (2018-10-21 11:56:04+00:00): Das Kirchberg neuerdings in der Bundesliga spielt, ist mir irgendwie entgangen. Seit wann haben die denn dieses Stadion?
simon484 (2018-10-21 20:22:30+00:00): Ich hab das doch nicht eingetragen , ich habe lediglich die Grünfläche daneben eingetragen .
Parzelle13 (2018-10-21 20:44:36+00:00): Na, wer denn dann? Siehe historie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614291817/history
tux67 (2018-10-22 12:51:14+00:00): @simon - Vielleicht änderst du's auf einen adäquaten Wert.
simon484 (2018-10-22 21:43:30+00:00): Habe es jetzt umgeändert .
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-31 11:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64041921 where the changeset comment is: Revert pseudo parks added by simon484
seattlefyi (2018-10-19 22:41:03+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing the map! You're right, they're not buildings, but there is a tag for that: building=roof. This is a valid existing structure, so it should still be in the map. Mind if I revert this change?
geodependent (2018-10-19 22:42:59+00:00): My mistake, yes please feel free. Thanks for the info!
seattlefyi (2018-10-19 22:58:08+00:00): No problem, there's a lot to know! I just undid that deletion, and changed the tag, not a huge deal at all. Really do appreciate the good faith edits, and hope to see more. If you have any questions feel free to send a msg.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-18 16:17:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5999184030
Hi,
You have craft=gardening while the wiki has craft=gardener.
Is that a typo, or is there a difference?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Acraft
Thanks!
caranteth (2022-01-18 16:22:33+00:00): Hi, probably just a typo - happy to be corrected!
eggie (2018-10-20 07:49:47+00:00): De Verbraakstraat heb ik ietsje verlegd naar het zuiden van het gebouw af  mbv de BGT omtrekgericht.
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-10-19 23:05:27+00:00): Als iemand weet welk object in het cirkelvormige vlak ik bedoel, kan het dan aangevuld worden aub?
eggie (2018-10-20 07:01:41+00:00): Erik.. Je kunt het best de review request aanvinken bij upload. Niet iedereen kijkt naar alle changesets die erbij komen. Ook op het forum kun je vragen kwijt. Ik zie hier wel een wandelpad dat vastzit aan de landuse. dat moet je zien te voorkomen. 
Dit waren je edits.
eggie (2018-10-20 07:17:31+00:00): Ik heb aan die structure Leisure=playground toegevoegd die ontbrak nog. De cirkel staat nu ook als inner in een multipolygoon .. anders zie je op afgeleide kaarten aalleen het speelplaatssymbool, maar geen cirkel. 
Het highway=path heb ik losgemaakt van het gras en een verbinding met de Idastraat gegeven. Om te voorkomen dat het routeert voor tweewielers zou je evt. vehicle=no kunnen toevoegen. 
Ziet er netjes uit zo.
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-20 08:23:42+00:00): De tag is steeds Leisure=playgroud  en de aanvullng komt dan steeds daarna
playground=........
Dat hoeft dus niet op een aparte node.

=Structure lijkt me oke.
viloan (2018-10-19 23:46:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-10-20 00:41:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
clay_c (2018-10-24 22:36:50+00:00): The outline looks good! I think you may have accidentally tagged it as Water though. Try changing it to Car Parking.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63694451
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:29:51+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mueschel (2018-10-20 14:16:23+00:00): Please be so kind and stop your imports until you have solved the issues with misspelled tags. 
There are hundreds of forests and rivers that contain the tag "addrcountry=Canada". Forests don't have addresses, and the tag 'addrcountry' doesn't exist anywhere else.
Dartmouthmapmaker (2018-10-20 17:02:23+00:00): I did and the instructions and video state that addressing tags are essential in the place ways
mueschel (2018-10-20 20:31:22+00:00): I don't know which instructions and video you refer to, but I think you misunderstood something. All 'addr:' tags are put on things like buildings, POI, or nodes, but not on streets, rivers or boundaries. This might get 'is_in' tags like 'is_in:city' - but even that is not necessary as long as the corresponding boundaries exist.
Additionally, misspelled tags like the mentioned 'addcountry' are quite useless because no software will understand them.
Dartmouthmapmaker (2018-10-20 21:03:10+00:00): Streets and highways etc  yes but not natural features JSOM  does not know the difference when it auto completes them
mueschel (2018-10-21 09:11:27+00:00): JOSM is not "intelligent" in a sense that it can determine which tags fit and which don't. That's up to the person operating it.
nevw (2018-10-20 06:18:10+00:00): Hi Peter
you have added maxspeed=0 to one of the Coalmine Road segments.
Peter Ashton (2018-10-20 10:48:04+00:00): Hi nevw, I am new to this so I hope I have done things OK. The reason I set this to 0 maxspeed is the section of the road is currently closed at the moment. Is there a more appropriate way to deal with this.
nevw (2018-10-20 11:01:55+00:00): You could also add access=no and maybe note="that road is closed and the reason" if you think that useful and a gate or fence at each end if blocked off. If it is a closure for the public but is used by company employees you could use access=private instead.
nevw (2018-10-21 08:27:26+00:00): Looks good now, Peter. 
thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-20 19:49:28+00:00): Hi Grigory Yuryev, welcome to OSM

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped cycleways? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63695392
Grigory Yuryev (2018-10-22 04:29:39+00:00): Тропы были удалены с карты для того чтобы усложнить жизнь распространителям наркотиков, использующим их.
mrpulley (2018-10-20 05:29:28+00:00): I've just spent the last several days looking at all the nodes imported at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108027 (and yes, it was tedious!) - this import about 10 years ago had inaccurate locations for the nodes. Many of these nodes have since had their locations corrected, so I have left those alone. All the deleted nodes were checked against imagery to double-check they were in the wrong location. Many of these had nearby duplicate nodes (from other surveys or imports).
viloan (2018-10-20 05:25:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-24 05:27:41+00:00): It's not connected to other highways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63695899
BladeManEXE10 (2018-10-24 13:20:26+00:00): So you can't mark a footway between buildings? It has to be connected to a road? Or is it just that it gives you a warning/suggestion?

Well, I already deleted it regardless. Thanks for reviewing my edits and helping make them more accurate.
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-25 02:32:52+00:00): You can, but it's a warning that navigation software won't be able to do anything with that information.
literan (2018-10-20 11:08:55+00:00): вы внесли снесенную многоэтажку. Смотрите более новые снимки. Откатываю. Тег was:building=apartments там стоял
LorenzoStucchi (2019-08-15 07:48:01+00:00): Ciao,
ho recentemente percorso il sentiero nominato Stoner, ma non ho trovato nessuna indicazione su questo nome e alcuni tratti che sono stati indicati come per mtb in realtà erano destinati solo a "pedoni", puo' essere che sono cambiati dalle tue modifiche? dove avevi preso queste informazioni?
Constable (2019-08-15 11:55:49+00:00): Ciao, sono abbastanza sicuro che il sentiero fosse già sulla mappa, io dopo aver visto la cartina dei sentieri alla stazione di partenza del Mottolino ho creato la relazione. Il sentiero sembra avere davvero quel nome https://www.mottolino.com/en/summer/activities/bike-park-livigno/trails , potrebbe però non essere preciso, perché non l'ho mai percorso.
Se conosci bene i sentieri del bike park, sentiti liberissimo di dargli una sistemata.
Grazie!
Ciao
LorenzoStucchi (2019-08-15 15:49:02+00:00): Ho visto la mappa, bisogna stabilire se è giusto assegnare il nome che viene dato dal bike park o quello del numero del sentiero (quale sia più rilevante). La cosa da notare è come sul luogo all'inizio del sentiero fosse segnalato quale tratto fosse dedicato al passaggio dei pedoni e quale alla discesa delle bici, con cartelli con il logo del mottolino. Cosa che però non risulta reale nella mappa del link. [Sto cercando una mappa online con i numero del sentiero ma non ne trovo]
Gh0stz0x (2019-08-15 18:10:37+00:00): Il numero del sentiero comunque va messo nel ref, quindi non ci dovrebbero essere problemi. Hai provato a guardare nelle cronologia chi ha inserito il sentiero? 😁