piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SnadBane (2018-12-08 04:34:35+00:00): pangus
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-09 08:43:26+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65285085
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-09 08:44:08+00:00): thanks.

revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65285076
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-09 08:43:00+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65285112
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-09 08:41:35+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65285151
SomeoneElse (2018-12-08 09:46:08+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please don't add fake things with fake names - people will only remove them.  Please do add things that really do exist (like this building, which does exist according to the underlying imagery).
If you'd like to add imaginary things to a map, then opengeofiction.net would welcome you.  If however you want to continue adding _real_ things, then please continue mapping in OpenStreetMap!
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Chetan_Gowda (2018-12-10 10:37:31+00:00): Hi Chandra Mohan, 

I appreciate your road improvement work in this region also welcome to OSM India. I'd suggest you to take a look "India WikiProject" which has detail information on tagging roads, naming cities etc.
 1. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India
2. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway

highway=road is used only for temporary purpose. You can tag these kind of roads as unclassified. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

Best,
Chetan
aharvey (2019-04-14 11:08:05+00:00): Thanks!
booktiger (2019-01-11 06:28:19+00:00): Please do not add the lines and stations that have not started construction to the map.
chnav (2018-12-10 11:11:38+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы удалили две совершенно нормальные улицы и перерисовали их по-новой, при этом потеряв часть информации, проставленной другим пользователем. Пожалуйста исправляйте данные, а не удаляйте, в этом случае сохранится история объекта и все теги. Спасибо.
topor911 (2018-12-10 15:22:55+00:00): здравствуйте вы видели как были установлены эти улицы? эти улицы были установлены неправильно другим пользователям, они установлены неправильно сильно заходят на территорию организации за блуждая пользователей. я установил как должно быть правельно
chnav (2018-12-10 16:26:24+00:00): Эти две линии, что вы нарисовали, практически полностью повторяют старые, разницы между ними нет. Возможно там был сбой, я уже не помню, иногда кто-то исправляет в веб-редакторе и случайно мышкой зацепляет узел и уносит его на несколько километров в сторону, получается зигзаг. Но это исправимо.
surveyor54 (2018-12-08 10:25:10+00:00): Hi,
bist du hier nicht ein bisschen voreilig?

Die Strecke  ist noch nicht reaktiviert und du hast das "disused" schon entfernt.

Also ist in OSM die Strecke schon frei gegeben, was nicht stimmt.

Außerdem ist "Lumdatalbahn (Reaktivierung in Vorbereitung)" kein Name, "Reaktivierung in Vorbereitung" sollte als "description" getaggt werden.

Gruß
surveyor54
surveyor54 (2018-12-19 21:40:30+00:00): Hi,

schade, dass du dich nicht meldest um den Sachverhalt zu klären. :(
oneofbeatlefan (2019-06-16 18:07:20+00:00): Hi, please kindly add construction=yes as in the LRT line itself are in construction. Thank you :D
atcomapper (2018-12-08 07:44:15+00:00): Reverted due to vandalism
BCNorwich (2018-12-08 09:13:23+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'm sorry to say that you have added your data to the outline of the whole corner building. This building is part of a multipolygon consisting of three inner polygons and one outer polygon, you changed it all all four areas are inner polygons, thus there is now no outline.
The address for the whole block is now 29 Finsbury Circus. The site of your company has not actually been positioned.

May I respectfully suggest that your changes are reverted and an outline or POI be mapped to correctly position your business. You could look at other businesses in the block to see how it's done.

If you need help in any of this please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
freebeer (2018-12-08 09:49:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65288512 where the changeset comment is: revert SEO edit that added a spammy description= field and broke a multipolygon relation
BCNorwich (2018-12-08 12:12:29+00:00): Hi freebeer, 
I have no problem with that except that it doesn't give the newbie much encouragement or ability to learn from their mistakes. There wasn't any serious disruption here, no vandalism, so these mistakes could have been left awhile. I always return to these after giving the newbie a chance to respond, then if there's been no response make the appropriate amendments/reversion. Or hopefully help them correct things. That's why I took the trouble to politely set out the mistakes that had been made.

Regards Bernard.
freebeer (2018-12-09 09:40:43+00:00): no worries, my revert can be reverted to make things broken again.

i lumped this together with a few other reverts where the user had thrown in the towel and asked for a revert as they were in over their head with relation issues.

that was my intent here, given that relations are not a simple concept to grok, to return this, like the others, to a clean slate and give the user a second chance, unburdened by whatever might have happened here.

your description of what went wrong does not read so much as a simple mistake, but more of a horror story of something somehow went t*tsup that should not have happened in the first place to a newbie.

of late, i have been attempting to repair broken relations, partly caused by bugs in the iD editor, and secondly where i have had to use iD and in half a dozen aborted edits, i have seen it automatically forces an edit upon me where i did not make one, do not want one, and ultimately it is *wrong* and luckily i noticed the number-of-edits counter increased when it should not have.

it is with this background that i assume any severe relation damage from an iD edit may well be an unreported bug, of which the user is unaware, or may be presented to the user without a `here be dragons' notice, after which the user may say, i don't know what i did but i didn't want to do that...

anyway, the user has a clean slate now and you are welcome to restore it as earlier, in the hope that an explanation as to what went wrong is forthcoming.  or not, if it is a bug.

cheers, and sorry for this pointless rambling
kartler175 (2019-01-04 12:29:46+00:00): Bitte mit dem Löschen von Wegen vorsichtig sein! 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.31889&lat=51.49045&zoom=16&opacity=1.00
http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=7142739
Map-Peter (2018-12-08 11:59:54+00:00): Hallo Xre90, 
aber der Laden ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1479443688/history ) ansich ist doch noch da - oder? Er sollte dann nicht gelöscht, sondern umgetagged werden. Bitte prüfen ob hier "disused:shop=bakery" ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused: ) passt und den Laden entsprechend wieder einzeichnen und eine "note" dran taggen, das es den Bäcker hier nicht mehr gibt. 
Dann wird der shop in der Karte nicht mehr gerendert. 
So kommt nicht ein anderer Mapper vorbei und zeichnet den Bäcker einfach wieder ein. 
Gruß Peter
Xre90 (2018-12-08 12:27:20+00:00): Hallo Map-Peter,
hab das mal so wieder eingetragen.
Die Metzgerei und die Bäckerei waren eines, ein Verkaufsraum (d.h. eine Theke war Metzgerei, die andere Bäckerei). Die Bäckereitheke ist weg. Dafür ist die Metzgerei jetzt größer (stehen u.A. Stühle darin).

Gruß 
Xre90
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2018-12-08 17:29:21+00:00): ก่อนอื่นต้องบอกให้ทราบก่อนว่าการปักหมุด "สถานที่ท่องเที่ยว" เปล่าๆ ไว้ทั่วแผนที่ โดยไม่ระบุว่าแต่ละที่คืออะไร ไม่ได้เป็นประโยชน์อะไรกับผู้ใช้แผนที่คนอื่นๆ เลย นอกจากจะทำให้รกและสับสนเปล่าๆ

OpenStreetMap ไม่ได้เป็นที่สำหรับปักหมุดสถานที่ชื่นชอบส่วนตัวครับ, ทุกอย่างที่คุณแก้บนแผนที่จะถูกบันทึกลงแผนที่ผืนเดียวกับที่คนอื่นๆ กำลังใช้อยู่

ขอให้กลับไปใส่ชื่อ กับประเภทของสถานที่ที่คุณได้ปักหมุดไว้ด้วยครับ

และถ้าเป็นไปได้ ขอให้กลับไปตอบคำถามที่ช่างทำแผนที่ท่านอื่นถามคุณค้างไว้ก่อนหน้านี้ด้วย: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56345952>

ขอบคุณครับ

Please note that putting blank "tourist attraction" POIs all over the map without actually noting what they actually were, will not be any use to other OpenStreetMap users other than causing clutter and confusion.

OpenStreetMap is not a place to store your personal bookmarks; all edits you made are recorded onto the same map that everybody else are using.

Please add names to, and correct type of your previously-added POIs.

If possible, also address the question that other cartographer asked you about your edits too: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56345952>.

Thank you.
andrewwiseman (2018-12-10 23:38:06+00:00): Hi jptolosa87, on this changeset you changed a secondary to a primary but this road doesn't seem like it joins major urban centers like the guidelines say are for primary. Also it might be helpful to comment on previous changesets to ask why a change was made instead of just changing the data. Thanks, let me know what you think. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Chile:Map_Features
jptolosa (2018-12-11 01:13:57+00:00): This is an important road that connect a turistic pole in the region (and with Argentina). Generally the two digits of the ref=* denote the importance.
andrewwiseman (2018-12-13 21:58:25+00:00): That disagrees with the Chile guidelines which says it need to be between major cities, neither of these are those, and refs are not mentioned there at all. That particular ref also continues farther but the entire route isn't tagged the same way. If I can also make a suggestion again to comment on changesets rather than reverting them, we can talk more about the issues and try to figure them out.
jptolosa (2018-12-14 08:06:25+00:00): There is a previous revertion made by you without comment. Possible exceptions are allowed and this section has been recognized as primary by other local users due the local reality.
abakus_uploader (2018-12-08 23:30:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2018-12-10 10:07:09+00:00): To akurat były poprawne adresy, z importu.
Te twoje na budynkach nie mają za to nazwy miejscowości.
maraf24 (2018-12-10 10:08:43+00:00): Adres można przenieść na nowo narysowany budynek korzystając z funkcji Scalanie w edytorze. Trzeba tylko zaznaczyć jednocześnie adres i budynek.
woodpeck_repair (2018-12-08 15:25:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65294845 where the changeset comment is: Restoring Ukraine as per https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2018-11-14_Crimea .
Reitstoen (2018-12-12 13:43:17+00:00): Man bruker imba-tagging kun på bike-parks må vite ;)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale:imba?uselang=en-US
trial (2019-04-30 15:04:55+00:00): Je ne sais ce qu'il y avait avant mais là ça ne suit pas les autres tracés bien plus fins :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198612834#map=17/48.30696/-4.57294
trial (2019-04-30 15:05:47+00:00): N .B : le cadastre ne peut être une référence pour le trait de côte ! Il dit au plus que la parcelle va jusqu'à la mer.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:31:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-12-08 10:55:24+00:00): Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Alles zit een beetje dubbel en geplakt aan elkaar.
Tip: Begin nooit met access=no  Dat is een totaalverbod voor iedereen.
Wanneer een wandelpad staat aangegeven met een rond blauw bord met de wandelaar taggen we footway in andere gevallen highway=path met evt vehicle=no als er geen voertuigen /fietsen mogen komen. 
Ik zal wat landuse  losmaken. Gebruik de linker alttoets. dan plakt iD niet.
Dit was je edit.
MVG,
Eggie

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65288313
eggie (2018-12-08 11:01:30+00:00): access no verwijderd en wegen losgemaakt van landuse . ...landuse weer goed gelegd
Huub Beckers (2018-12-09 13:38:57+00:00): inderdaad beginnersfout sorry, bedankt voor de tips, volgende keer beter. gr.
Huub
eggie (2018-12-09 13:56:43+00:00): Oke Huub.. Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen. OSM is wel erg lastig in het begin. Mapse verder...
MVG,
Eggie
maraf24 (2018-12-23 22:10:35+00:00): Media Expert to nie supermarket, ale sklep z agd (shop=electronics)
abakus_uploader (2018-12-08 23:30:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2018-12-09 19:55:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65291638
ndm (2018-12-08 15:30:57+00:00): Note: most buildings in Bristol are drawn using ESRI clarity -- unfortunately, in the last week or so, that's become a lot fainter with some different shifts. The original stuff was a lot clearer and more accurate -- so may be better to if buildings aren't aligned with your imagery to change the imagery offset in JOSM, rather than moving all the buildings.
ma-rt-in (2018-12-09 11:37:10+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier zwei mal, die selbe Einrichtung eingetragen. Ich habe es nur mal vereinfacht und angepasst.
vg
Durko_freemap (2018-12-09 12:04:42+00:00): Ahoj,
tu som si vsimol pouzitie tagu addr:street=ČSA (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653541907#map=15/49.0502/19.7601). Podla mne dostupnych udajov (3/2018) tato obec nema pomenovane ulice. ulica CSA je v Liptovskom Hradku, ale nazov by mal koncit na hranici mesta. Samozrejme ak si domaci, tak mas lepsie info. Vdaka za odpoved. Durko.
ma-rt-in (2018-12-09 11:24:44+00:00): Hallo,
prüfe deine Änderungen bzgl Way 38162256 nochmals. oneway gibt es nur mit =yes oder =-1 .
vg
PFMLB (2018-12-09 14:09:44+00:00): Moin,
ist geändert. Ist mir bis dato nicht aufgefallen das die Validierung bei conditional nicht greift.
VG
Otenkiya (2018-12-09 01:12:39+00:00): この変更セットにより削除されたリレーション416684を復旧しましたのでお知らせします。編集の際にリレーションを破壊しないよう注意願います。
nacre7 (2018-12-09 09:39:16+00:00): ありがとうございます。
次から気をつけます、すみませんでした。
ma-rt-in (2018-12-08 18:25:46+00:00): Hallo,
aus welchem grund werden die Abschnitte gesperrt?
PFMLB (2018-12-09 02:14:58+00:00): Baustelle, die Straßenoberfläche wird Grundsaniert. Hab es wohl versäumt einzutragen.
PFMLB (2018-12-09 02:20:40+00:00): Ist jetzt eingetragen -> Highway type construction + Note
ma-rt-in (2019-02-14 11:51:09+00:00): Ist die Strecke fertig?
PFMLB (2019-02-15 13:08:21+00:00): Nein ist noch nicht fertig. Hab die Sperrung bis Woche 10 verlängert. Offiziell sind leider keine Informationen zu erhalten. Der Fortschritt auf der Baustelle sieht nicht gut aus so das die Baustelle noch länger Bestehen bleibt.
ma-rt-in (2019-02-17 15:56:23+00:00): Ok Danke fürs Update
Durko_freemap (2018-12-08 16:45:47+00:00): Ahoj Toggoboom, 
vitaj v OSM, snad sa neurazis, ked ta upozornim na par veci: 
1. prosim neposuvaj budovy predtym nez si posunies bing podklad. Ked pozries sem (https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=65291214, https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=65290939, https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=65290504) tak tie cervene boli spravne umiestnene, ked si pozries svoje posuny, tak zistis ze vsetko si posuval jednym smerom, cize keby si posunul podklad tak by si zistil ze su umiestnene spravne
2. "nemazať". Nemazať čiaru, ktorú potom znova nakreslím. 
Teda v tomto prípade, nie že zmažem dom a znova ho nakreslím, ak je zle umiestnený, alebo nesedí tvar pôdorysu. Ale upraviť pôvodné dáta na nové. A prípadne pridať/ubrať nejaké označenie (tagy), ak to situácia vyžaduje. 
Takto sa zachová história objektu. 
Dik za pozornost.
Durko
ulmtuelp (2018-12-21 07:28:41+00:00): Der Weg 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653550097
hat mehrere Überschneidungen und Doppelungen. Bitte auflösen, danke.
Lothar2 (2018-12-21 10:42:31+00:00): Ich hab mir extra Mühe gegeben den Weg in einem Stück hinzubekommen, da es sich um einen in Schleifen zu fahrenden Rundkurs handelt.
 Du meinst es ist Besser ihn in Teilsegmente zu zerlegen?
ulmtuelp (2018-12-21 12:55:56+00:00): Es sind in der Form Geometriefehler, schön hier zu sehen so lange die Fehler bestehen:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=12.54176&lat=50.69827&zoom=17
Für Routing müssten Abbiegehinweise / Richtungen angegeben werden,
Lothar2 (2018-12-21 14:45:05+00:00): Abbiegehinweise und Routing sind schwer, da vielseitig kombinierbar.
 Hab es mal so gut es geht in zusammenhängende Abschnitte aufgeteilt.
 Schaus dir mal an.
rab (2018-12-08 13:29:31+00:00): Es ist ein Baugebiet, deshalb macht es keinen Sinn irgendwelche Wege einzuzeichnen die eh wieder verschwinden. (tracks  Damit machst du anderen nur unnötige Arbeit. highway=construction weil es offensichtlich noch nicht fertiggestellt ist. Hier sollte man erst weiterarbeiten wenn neue Bilder zur Verfügung gestellt werden.
viloan (2018-12-08 12:46:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
blendergeek (2019-03-05 17:12:05+00:00): This changeset is incorrect. The old alignment of University Blvd was correct. Satellite imagery is really tricky at Liberty Univeristy. Please consider reverting this.
Jaffs (2019-03-05 19:15:16+00:00): I will try to fix it soon, but it is not clear which satellite imagery to use.
blendergeek (2019-03-05 19:26:51+00:00): Is it possible to do a simple revert? I cannot find any correct satellite imagery as the current on-the-ground alignment was built about 7 months ago.
Jaffs (2019-03-05 19:51:27+00:00): I think that the rollback edit can be done, but I do not know how to do it.
blendergeek (2019-03-07 00:08:22+00:00): I will therefore attempt a rollback using JOSM.
luiswoo (2018-12-08 14:42:27+00:00): В JOSM есть создание параллельой линий (Shift+P, C — соединение двух отрезков в один); X — создание прямоугольника из отрезка; W — режим уточнения линии; Ctrl+Shift+V — вставка тегов из скопированного объекта; Alt+X — режет контур по линии.
В идеале, телодвижений при создании лесополос выходит минимум в два раза меньше. https://yadi.sk/i/k_Pls7GvrOnNTw — видео о создании "кривой" лесополосы.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
tux67 (2018-12-09 10:32:19+00:00): Steht da irgendwo ein Schild "Alter Schulhof"? Wenn nein, dann ist das maximal loc_name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65292231
tux67 (2018-12-09 10:40:40+00:00): und .. ein nur name node .. solltest du inzwischen wissen "Jugendparliament Titz-Rödingen" zu dem Namen muß noch eine Funktion. Wenn es das hier ist: https://www.gemeinde-titz.de/daseinsfuersorge/jugendparlament/index.php
dann ist's auch noch falsch geschrieben. 
Ich vermute mal da gehört ein office tag dran https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office
ggf. Office=association
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65292231
eggie (2018-12-08 13:36:33+00:00): Dag Jasper.. Moet het niet zijn motor-vehicle= destination?  Want nu wordt elke vorm van weggebruik tegengehouden. 'k Neem toch aan dat je te voet of met de fiets daar wel mag komen?
Mvg, Eggie
eggie (2018-12-08 13:37:14+00:00): Het is trouwens motor_vehicle..
jaspervhaastert (2018-12-08 13:45:17+00:00): Hi Eggie, aan het begin van de straat hangt een bord met "Eigen terrein. Parkeren en toegang uitsluitend bewoners" erop. Technisch gezien, mag je hier dus ook niet te voet of met de fiets komen.
En op de wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) staat bij "destination" dat als toegang alleen voor bewoners is, dat het dan "private" moet zijn.
Mvg, Jasper.
eggie (2018-12-08 14:32:34+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.. HG. Eggie
tux67 (2018-12-09 10:30:24+00:00): Private Zufahrten von Häusern direkt an der Straße so zu  mappen ist nicht unbedingt wünschenswert. Kannst du das bitte nochmal überdenken ..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65292441
mueschel (2018-12-08 15:46:33+00:00): Hallo,
ist das ein Weg, den Radfahrer und Fußgänger benutzen dürfen? Dann ist "path" richtig. Ein cycleway ist nur für Radfahrer, bzw. vorrangig für sie.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:31:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].