piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
punya_man (2019-02-28 03:53:20+00:00): "Hi aisah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437489502,way 437490457 classified as 'unclassied'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as unclassified cannot be left hanging.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
Gumeg (2017-10-25 07:21:32+00:00): Hi! Did you was here, in Tiksi? Whai is the source of your changes? 
And i think a "name" tag should be russian.
skunk (2017-11-26 19:12:38+00:00): Ist die Baustelle noch immer aktuell?
eggie (2017-05-02 10:39:26+00:00): Calisthenics toestel is geen internationale aardrijkskundige naam in mijn idee.
Je kunt dat beter weghalen. Ook bij dat andere toestel. sport = fitness lijkt me voldoende. 
We zetten toch ook geen name=glijbaan op de kaart.
Je zou het wel als note=Calisthenics toestel erbij kunnen zetten en dan het liefst in het Engels.
Skippern (2017-05-03 00:51:19+00:00): Isso deve ser um ponto de ônibus?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:57:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:35:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
letihu (2017-07-26 10:00:55+00:00): Warum die "Verfeinerungen" dazu führen, dass nodes nun unverbunden übereinander liegen, erschließt sich mir nicht.
Z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4830558258/history
auf
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1892975963/history

oder
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1892975968/history
auf
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4830558257/history

iD lässt leider solche Fehler auch zu.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:39:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:23:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
sp4rkie (2017-05-02 10:50:27+00:00): sorry, the comment of this changeset is wrong and can't be changed.

The reason for this changeset was: the removal of an erroneous name tag.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:30:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:28:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:33:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:30:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:23:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:30:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Tomas Straupis (2017-05-02 11:27:43+00:00): Changeset reverted, because nothing in it was done according to OpenStreetMap conventions in wiki as well as not according to mapping agreements in Lithuania.
It also introduced wrong routing information as well as other problems.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:09:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:58:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Jay May (2017-05-02 11:23:25+00:00): Hi Tomas, why do you keep deleting the border checkpoint limits? I enter them so it is clear where they are, and so do OSM users around the world.
Moreover, I had created a couple of lanes on the Lavoriškės checkpoint in order to ease border crossing for people ("All passports", "EU/EEE/CH" and "TIR" lanes). 
I do understand your point about WC name deleting (although I put "plastmasė" on purpose as not everyone likes this kind of public toilets). 
However, all the other info is useful for users having issues in choosing their lanes & knowing where the border checkpoint limits are; as those border crossing are absolutely not user-friendly.
Regards,
Tomas Straupis (2017-05-02 11:30:41+00:00): Because these (and a lot of other) objects are not tagged according to OpenStreetMap wiki information. Randomly mapped data is useless and it only introduces unnecessary complexity.
As per mapping agreements in Lithuania lanes are NOT mapped as separate vectors bur rather as additional lane tags on existing ways.
Please read agreements/conventions because otherwise you would be wasting your time as well as mine.
Jay May (2017-05-03 07:44:58+00:00): You could have written that earlier - we are people, aren't we? It is important to talk. I am new to openstreetmap and so far, absolutely no one in Latvia, Belarus, Russian or Poland made any problem out of my changes to any border checkpoint, road, name, etc.as the aim is to be as accurate as possible. 
As I told you: I am not mapping "randomly" as you wrote. I cross those border checkpoints in Lavoriškės, Šumskas and Medininkai regularly between April and October so I know them by heart. If it were not forbidden to film, I would even provide you a movie from there. I separated those lanes because they get separated at some point (solid obstacles between them). Otherwise, I wouldn't have made separate lanes. Here is one proof (it hasn't changed since this pic was made, in 2013. This is the view towards Vilnius https://plus.google.com/photos/photo/100402212156008529911/5877164169356688482)
Could you please kindly provide a link of what I am supposed to read?
Tomas Straupis (2017-05-03 08:35:59+00:00): As far as I know nobody in the countries you mention is doing hourly changeset review. I did see a number of errors outside Lithuania, so somebody sometime WILL notice them and do something about it.
By "randomly" I mean that you did not check the meaning/usage of tags in OSM wiki. You would have noticed that barried=border_control is ONLY mapped as a node:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dborder_control
the same with other random tags such as building=no, self-invented usage of name tags like "103 (PKP Lavoriškės)“ etc.
So far no useful information was added.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:25:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-05-02 12:26:13+00:00): :)
Bezoek zeker ook het forum. Hier is de laatste tijd door andere mappers veel landuse omgezet naar leisure =park.
terwijl de landuse grass, forest is verwijderd. Wellicht wel en uitdaging om die hier  terug te brengen.  Zie het gebied ten zuiden van hier.
Leisure is de functie en hoort als een losse deken over de landuse en water heen te liggen. Het is een transparant,
Chetan_Gowda (2017-05-04 06:19:30+00:00): Hey xronos_nisfi_import, can you point me the import catalogue or wiki. Also,  it'd be good to have comments for every upload you do from this account. 

Best,
Chetan
xronos_nlsfi_import (2017-05-04 19:13:46+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta
http://kartat.kapsi.fi/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Maastotietokanta/Luokat
Chetan_Gowda (2017-05-05 08:47:30+00:00): Thank you for getting back!
Константин Гам (2020-04-09 16:29:50+00:00): Не надо вносить несущствующие названия остановок пожалуйста и свои фантазии тоже
EinKonstanzer (2020-09-01 08:10:04+00:00): Du gibst als source="Bing AI" an. Wer oder was ist das? Vielleicht hast du ja auch einen Link?
DerGuteMercator (2020-09-05 16:29:34+00:00): Bing AI = Bing Aerial Images, also die Luftaufnahmen, die über Bing bereitgestellt werden.
EinKonstanzer (2020-09-05 20:56:15+00:00): Dann bin ich ja beruhigt! :-) Ich dachte bei "AI" an künstliche Intelligenz.... Also das was Facebook und co. da veranstalten um OSM zu "helfen".
RoterEmil (2017-05-03 08:07:19+00:00): Hi 'foolon', stimmt die Adresse oder der Standort des von Dir eingefügten Ministeriums nicht? Das müsste je nachdem korrigiert werden. Danke und schöne Grüße :)
foolon (2017-05-03 09:17:39+00:00): Hallo RoterEmil die Adresse bezieht sich auf die Postanschrift, im Gebäude Mainzer Str. 35 befindet sich eine Nebenstelle des Ministeriums, dessen Hauptsitz ist Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 12
RoterEmil (2017-05-03 14:03:37+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort! Dann sollte hier aber die konkrete Adresse angeben werden. Das es eine Nebenstelle ist, kann ja z.B. im Namen mit angegeben werden.
foolon (2017-05-05 04:58:53+00:00): Erledigt :)
eggie (2017-05-02 12:14:41+00:00): Welkomst PB gestuurd
eggie (2017-05-02 12:18:22+00:00): De adresnode zou je ook nog kunnen verwijderen.
Rodrigo Rega (2018-04-20 19:44:25+00:00): Hola,

En este conjunto de cambios quedó el área 490899049 sin ningún tag. ¿Podrías echarle un vistazo?

Un saludo.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:29:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:25:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:18:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:50:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-10-02 18:46:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52569295 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48163470].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-10-02 18:46:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52569295 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48163470].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:19:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:10:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
TheSwavu (2017-05-13 10:21:46+00:00): Not sure exactly what's gone wrong but while you've been creating these bus routes you've also modified a large number of turn restrictions to have multiple from values eg:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/6614793
mavl (2017-10-02 18:46:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52569295 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48163470].
AdventureBuffalo (2017-05-08 03:57:54+00:00): This road has been renamed incorrectly - the old name "Donnelly Crescent" was correct, as per the City of Red Deer interactive map (http://webmap.reddeer.ca/Webmap/Default.aspx)
florinbadita_telenav (2017-05-08 17:58:39+00:00): Hi, thanks for the comment. I have send a email to the Natural Resources Canada (they create the Canvec dataset from what i know) and told them that they should update their database.
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-07 06:05:51+00:00): Hey Nativ, the route you added is strangely 90-degreish, and the bing Aerial photos show a slightly different path. Is it the same path?
nativ (2017-05-08 04:24:38+00:00): the change is the the ride that i did , the maps are not correct since there is fence and i had to go in different way and this is why there is 90 degrees...
i tried to add my gpx file but i didnt succeed
give me your mail and i will send you the gpx recording
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-12 11:30:30+00:00): Where is the fence? Perhaps you should tag it with barrier=fence
user_5359 (2017-05-03 16:48:03+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Okay es gibt keine aktuellen Luftbilder, aber ich vermute mal, dass hier nicht das Haus sondern die Grundstückgrenze eingezeichnet wurde. Bitte nur die Hausumrisse mit building kennzeichnen.
Euskirchener (2017-05-03 17:54:04+00:00): Ebenfalls hallo von meiner Seite! Wie mein Vorredner schon gesagt hat, wurde hier tatsächlich die Grundstücksgrenze (wenn auch windschief) eingetragen. Zur Info: Du kannst auch noch weitere Infos zu deinem Ferienhaus angeben (Internetseite, Telefonnummer usw.). Mindestens noch dazu sollte das Attribut "tourism=apartment", das das ganze erst als Ferienwohnung kennzeichnet. Erst dann wird von der „Software“ erkannt, um was es sich handelt. Schau mal in unserer Wiki nach (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tourism), dort findest du dann auch über die Suche die passenden Attribute, um Webseite etc. einzutragen. Da das Grundstück laut Foto offenbar nicht eingezäunt o.ä. ist, wird die Grundstücksfläche erst recht nicht eingetragen.

Bitte melde dich hier in der Diskussion wieder zurück, wir bieten dir gerne Hilfe bei der Korrektur an! Meistens ist dies für Anfänger nicht so leicht und geht oft schief.

Grüße
Richard van Lipzig (2017-05-08 05:45:28+00:00): Guten Morgen zusammen!
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich bin tatsächlich ein wenig überfordert. Ich hatte wie vermutet das Grundstück und nicht das Gebäude versucht zu zeichnen. Das Haus selber ist 15m breit und 8m tief. Zu finden ist das Haus unter http://www.ferienhaus-pfotenglueck.de/
Dürfte ich Ihre Hilfe in Anspruch nehmen?
Danke :-)
Richard van Lipzig
Euskirchener (2017-05-08 09:19:10+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung! Natürlich bieten wir Hilfe an, OpenStreetMap ist schließlich ein Community-Projekt :) Ich werde heute Abend mal eine Überarbeitung durchführen und mich hier nochmal melden.
Euskirchener (2017-05-08 16:24:41+00:00): Hallo nochmal, wie versprochen habe ich die Überarbeitung durchgeführt, so wie es laut unseren Konventionen korrekt ist. Das fertige Ergebnis kannst du dir hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490910468) ansehen, bis es dann korrekt auf der Karte angezeigt wird, dauert es ca. noch 2 Tage. Schau dir mal die Attribute an, alles links in der Tabelle ist blau verlinkt und führt zu unserer Wiki, wo erklärt wird, was es bedeutet (das meiste lässt sich mit geringen Englischkenntnissen aber auch gut übersetzen). Mit allen auf der Webseite verfügbaren Daten habe ich nun so genau wie möglich versucht alles einzutragen. Anhand der Fotos auf der Seite und deinen Maßangaben habe ich die ungefähren Umrisse und Position versucht zu schätzen. Die Fehler habe ich auch behoben, du brauchst dich also um nichts mehr kümmern. Wenn du weiter mit OpenStreetMap arbeiten willst, gibt es wie bereits oben gesagt unsere Wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite) als großes Nachschlagewerk und hier (http://learnosm.org/de/beginner/) ein Anfänger-Tutorial.

Grüße
Richard van Lipzig (2017-05-16 16:55:34+00:00): Hallo. Vielen Dank für die Hilfe. 
Grüße Richard van Lipzig
hadw (2017-05-04 10:31:11+00:00): This looks like a description of the building, not its name.  In that case, please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Derby45 (2017-05-04 11:00:21+00:00): Hi, hadw

I've only changed the shape of the building as this was originaly square. The name was added by another user.
hadw (2017-05-04 11:07:55+00:00): Oops.  Re-issued against the correct changeset.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
flohoff (2017-05-05 10:02:55+00:00): Hi Tastenmensch,
ich habe ein paar Anmerkungen hier.

Zum einen wäre es schön wenn du eine Beschreibung der änderung hinterlassen würdest. Dafür sind die changeset kommentare da, das andere nachvollziehen können was Sinn der änderung war.

Das andere ist das auf dem Wegen auf dem Friedhof jeweils ein highway=footway foot=yes drauf ist - Das ist ja doppeltgemoppelt und kann eigentlich runter.

Dann ist mir so aus der Erinnerung noch eingefallen das zumindest der Westliche zugang von der Bruder Konrad Straße doch mit Stufen/Treppe beginnt oder?

Flo
tastenmensch (2017-05-09 09:28:47+00:00): Ahoi, den foot-tag habe ich entfernt. Hatte ich unfreiwillig durch kopieren des Radweges übernommen. Zu den Treppen weiß ich nichts da ich nicht aus der Region komme - war letzte Woche nur kurz dort. Grüße!
mavl (2018-12-25 19:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:34:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dieterdreist (2017-05-02 13:59:37+00:00): please use more explicit changeset comments, for a hint how a good changeset comment might look like, see here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
opendcc (2017-05-02 13:03:41+00:00): Guten Tag,

mit Verlaub: ich war da extra vor Ort. Ein Seerundweg ist mehrfach ausgeschildert und frei benutzbar. Ich habe auch einen Track aufgezeichnet und hochgeladen. Zudem ist da ein öffentlcher Badeplatz des Landes Oberösterreich beschildert.

Ich fordere Sie also auf, diese offensichtlich von privaten Interessen geleiteten Löschaktionen bleiben zu lassen. Vermutlich sind sie einer der Eigentümer von PKWs, die da trotz Einfahrverbot direkt am Ufer anzutreffen waren.
Harald Hartmann (2017-05-02 13:23:07+00:00): @opendcc: du hast nicht zufällig ein paar Fotos von der Umgebung gemacht?