piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wambacher (2019-02-06 10:28:50+00:00): and sorry for my hard words: This night the international boundaries of 7 Countries have been destroyed - but not by you.

Yes, you made a beginners error, and you are not responsible for the other 6. But i did not know that until now.

Sorry for that, walter/germany
soco12345555555 (2019-02-06 10:55:32+00:00): I appreciate for that and dont be sorry. I will try not to make the mistake again. thank you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
jc86035 (2019-02-07 12:59:40+00:00): "Kong Sham Western Highway"/"深港西部通道" only refers to the road from Ngau Hom Shek to Lam Tei, not the road from Ngau Hom Shek to the Dongjiaotou reclamation.
jc86035 (2019-02-07 13:04:42+00:00): At least in the Hong Kong government's official map (www.map.gov.hk) as well as other official publications. Since the road's name=* is determined as if the entire bridge were in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong government's name for the carriageway of the bridge should be used, so the name=* should be either "Shenzhen Bay Bridge" or "Hong Kong–Shenzhen Western Corridor".
jc86035 (2019-02-07 13:16:39+00:00): (direct link: https://www.map.gov.hk/gm/s/ST/14290)
Also, the fire station is clearly called "Shenzhen Bay Fire Station" (https://www.hkfsd.gov.hk/eng/enquiry/distrib/).
jc86035 (2019-02-07 14:50:58+00:00): Sorry, in the first comment "深港西部通道" should be "港深西部公路".
jc86035 (2019-02-08 15:15:39+00:00): Since you didn't reply, I've reverted and swapped the name and alt_name keys (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67028281).
mavl (2019-02-28 17:16:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
abrensch (2019-02-10 11:38:36+00:00): Hallo Win32netsky

ich hbe diese TR hier von "only_right_turn" auf "no_right_turn" geändert, weil sonst sperrst Du die Merseburger Brücke schon jetzt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9299725

Gruss, Arndt
freebeer (2019-02-05 15:38:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66935558 where the changeset comment is: Oops.  That did *not* work.  Back to the well-worn drawing board.
eggie (2019-02-05 13:54:00+00:00): Marc.. Probeer aan te geven wat je doet. Dus bv wandelpad toegevoegd. Let op dat je de paden niet aan de landuse vastplakt. Je kunt dat voorkomen door de linker atltoets te gebruiken.
Beter is het om over te stappen naar editor JOSM
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-05 14:02:38+00:00): paden losgemaakt van landuse
eggie (2019-02-05 15:13:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Lijkt me aardig volledig... Evt kun je website= en phone= ook nog toevoegen.
MVG,
Eggie
voles (2019-02-05 15:17:09+00:00): Bedankt voor je hulp! Een website is er niet. Telefoonnummer ga ik morgen voor kijken.
Robot8A (2019-02-06 15:08:18+00:00): Por favor, comenta más tus cambios para que se sepa qué has modificado, gracias.
Un ejemplo de comentario para esta edición podría ser: Cambio de clasificación de Avenida Cataluña de trunk a primary.

Saludos
mbethke (2019-02-11 16:05:52+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the mapping! There's a tag combination for this kind of shop: shop=motorcycle with motorcycle:repair=yes and motorcycle:sales=no

cheers,
Matthias
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
Warin61 (2019-02-11 07:19:30+00:00): Hi
Way 52871193 does not connect to way 668464708
petrar_telenav (2019-02-12 07:05:43+00:00): Hi,
I've corrected this.
frosm (2019-02-05 13:56:12+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
qu'est-ce que c'est exactement ?
les bureaux d'une administration publique ? et c'est voulu de l'avoir créé en double, l'ensemble du bâtiment n'a pas la même adresse ou la même fonction ?
bonne continuation
Guingamp-Paimpol Agglomération (2019-02-05 16:37:32+00:00): Bonjour,
Guingamp-Paimpol Agglomération est un établissement public de coopération intercommunale.
L'ensemble du bâtiment a la même adresse : 11 rue de la Trinité, 22200 Guingamp. Ce n'est pas voulu d'apparaitre en double.
vous remerciant,
mueschel (2019-02-07 16:54:32+00:00): Hi,
these 374 buildings all have very strange tags. Please have a look and fix them.

Jan

    ID_check=3220
    OBJECTID=0
    OSMID=605215070
    SHAPE_Area=8.59451552669E-10
    SHAPE_Leng=0.99
    osmchanges=0
    osmtimesta=1899-12-30
    osmuid=8130083
    osmuser=Arunga
    osmversion=1
    osmvisible=true
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
dmlu (2019-02-06 11:55:05+00:00): Obrigado e bem vindo! :)
eggie (2019-02-05 15:20:10+00:00): Dag HAM vd Berg.. Ben toch benieuwd hoe je al die accesstags erop weet te krijgen?
Het kan overigens geen kwaad. 
Zet JOSM je op het verkeerde been? .. en wat is precies je bedoeling? Het fietspad was toch goed getagd. Het enige dat ontbreekt is welk soort fietspad het betreft. NL:G13 , G11, G12a?
Hier de tags die we op een fietspad zetten.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
Dit waren je edits.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66933446
MVG,
Eggie
HAMvdBerg (2019-02-06 09:44:12+00:00): Het probleem ligt bij de verschillende routing protocollen die gebruikt worden. Die zijn kennelijk niet gelijk voor de de openrouteservice en MapQuest. MapQuest ziet de de restricties het fietspad als een verbod om er gebruik van te maken. Daarom heb ik access expliciet op "yes" gezet. Een consequentie hiervan is dat het gebruik dat niet is toegestaan expliciet op "no" moest zetten. Hiermee hoop de moeilijkheden voor MapQuest gebruikers, waartoe ik ook behoor, uit de weg te hebben geruimd. Mijn suggestie zou zijn om de veranderingen door te voeren en te controleren of de problemen hiermee zijn opgelost. Mochtt dit niet het geval zijn dan herstellen we weer de oude situatie.
U hebt zelf voorgesteld om de restricties in zijn geheel te laten vervallen. Dit is zeker een optie en verhoogt de consistentie in vergelijking met andere rijwiel/voet-paden. Helaas, als newbe, zag ik geen mogelijkheden deze verwijdering door te voeren. Als U dit wel kunt, mijn zegen heeft U.
MvG,
HAMvdBerg
eggie (2019-02-06 09:55:23+00:00): Dag HAM vd Berg..Up to you... Maar het lijkt me beter een berichtje naar de ontwikkelaar te sturen van de router-applicatie. Die zullen zich moeten aanpassen aan de tagging van OSM.
Je kunt anders het probleem ook voorleggen aan het forum van OSM. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Wanneer je de weg selecteert zie je toch alle tags in JOSM en kun je de tags gewoon aanpassen. Klikken op het prullenbakje/"verwijderen" zal de tag doen verdwijnen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-06 10:02:43+00:00): ... aanvulling.. maar begrijp ik nu uit je verhaal dat het fietspad niet wil routeren voor fietsers waar het voor bedoeld is?
frosm (2019-02-05 14:56:57+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
dans la mesure du possible, essayez d'améliorer les batiments existant au lieu d'effacer et d'en recréer un nouveau.
parce qu'au passage, l'historique est perdu ansi que les infos du premier bâtiment (par ex le no 34 de la rue) sans qu'on sache si c'est involontaire ou s'il y avait une erreur dans les données précédentes.
bonne continuation
Duja (2019-02-22 15:47:25+00:00): Hey, you just deleted a huge Farmland multipolygon with 86 revs and myriad members.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5637940
I can agree it was oversized, but deleting it is not a solution.
Duja (2019-02-22 15:53:05+00:00): You also deleted a large one at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67079978
It's not cool deleting others' work without replacement.
JJIglesias (2019-02-06 11:01:21+00:00): Saludos
Creaste una linea sobre vias ya existentes sin darle ningun atributo, osea etiquetarla para decir QUE ES esa via. Antes de editar te sugerimos que visites y sigas:
http://learnosm.org/es/
Infelizmente como en el mapa no pueden quedar lineas sin identificacion pues afecta otra data ya existente, he procedido a borrarla.
Gracias
Erin76 (2019-02-05 18:47:02+00:00): Hey Midgard, the HV-line has been entirely removed. This means cables and supporting infrastructure was removed. I am not sure if the "unused" tag is the best way to describe this, as the line is currently back visible on the map
M!dgard (2019-02-05 19:50:23+00:00): I surveyed today near transition station Brugge Zuidervaart, the towers and conductors were still in place (though they were earthed). Where did you see them removed? If you say they are removed elsewhere, Elia will probably remove them here too.
frosm (2019-02-05 14:52:52+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
n'hésitez pas à tester le tutoriel pour découvrir comment décrire le chemin (pour l'instant c'est juste une succession de points)
bonne continuation
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
viloan (2019-02-05 14:59:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Horza (2019-02-05 15:02:33+00:00): Two extra things to mention here. 

Lots of roads around here are labelled Fish Camp Road. That seems weird

There's a weird deviation of the line for Lochloosa Wildlife Conservation area north of the lake. Is this a real feature? I suspect this boundary is inaccurate
Horza (2019-02-05 15:11:37+00:00): Checking the St Johns River Water District website suggests this is accurate apart from maybe the deviation across the lake

Also suggests only real Fish Camp Road is the one between 325 and 301
jmapb (2019-02-16 23:36:22+00:00): Hi vioelmaps, thanks for you contributions!

To answer your question (is that node even necessary?) -- it depends whether CVS is the only thing with the address 41-02 Queens Boulevard.

If CVS is the only thing with that address, the extra node should be deleted.

If other POIs are using the same address, but they are also mapped separately (eg, if Salt & Fat were also 41-02) then the extra node can still be deleted, because it doesn't refer to anything that's not mapped elsewhere.

But if there's something else sharing the same address that's not explicitly mapped  -- a vacant business, an entrance to a residence above the shop, or even just a mysterious door marked only with the address -- better to keep the extra address node too.

Note that this is usually only an issue for buildings that have multiple addresses -- in this case because the building is on a corner. Buildings with a single address will have the address tags on the building itself and so 1) won't need separate address nodes and 2) POI nodes inside don't need explicit address tags because they will inherit from the building.

good luck, jmapb
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
mavl (2019-02-28 17:16:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
jseigneuret (2019-02-06 14:13:47+00:00): Thanks for this fix
andrewwiseman (2019-02-18 19:58:54+00:00): Hi, it looks like you are changing a lot of highway classifications in ways that don't fit the Highway Tag Africa guidelines. Can you explain why? For example, many of the roads in this changeset such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169545020#map=16/9.0396/7.4594
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
jmapb (2019-02-16 23:55:18+00:00): Hi vioelmaps -- are there really two separate Turkish Grills here? Certainly that's possible, but the fact that they have the same phone number gives me pause.
viloan (2019-02-05 15:28:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
andrewwiseman (2019-02-18 20:00:04+00:00): Hi, it looks like you are changing a lot of highway classifications in ways that don't fit the Highway Tag Africa guidelines. Can you explain why? For example, many of the roads in this changeset such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114132916#map=16/9.0321/7.4668 . It's resulting in inconsistent roads and many seem to be wrong.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
tux67 (2019-02-06 13:46:50+00:00): Hallo leiff57, es ist nicht ganz klar, ob diese Änderung die Reaktion auf meine Anfrage hier ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66828462
Auf jeden Fall ist es mit Name vollständig. Allerdings ist hier der Cahngeset Kommentar name nicht sehr aussagekräftig und es fehlt eine Quellenangabe. Bitte beantworte die Changeset Kommentare, damit Leute die Qualitätschecks machen auch sehen, daß du die Kommentare bekommst.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66935788
Robert46798 (2019-02-06 08:02:21+00:00): Hallo Quedel83,

zu der Änderung selbst kann ich nicht viel sagen, das es sehr ortspezifische Sachen sind.

Ich möchte dich aber noch auf den Wert "fixme" hinweisen (--> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fixme). Damit kannst du Anmerkungen zu "Fehlern" wie der Genauigkeit machen. Das wird von verschiedenen Programmen für andere Mapper gut sichtbar ausgewertet. Dann ist die Bemerkung mit dem ungenauen Verlauf losgelöst von deinem Änderungssatz sichtbar.

Falls du häufiger dort entlang kommst möchte ich dich ermuntern GPS-Aufzeichnungen hochzuladen. Das aufzeichnen geht mit den meisten Handys sehr gut und einfach. Ich persönlich nutze "OSMTracker", aber das ist nur eine Möglichkeit. Wenn man mehrere GPS-Spuren hat kann man die Straßen schon ziemlich genau einzeichnen. Bis aktuelle Luftbilder vorhanden sind könnten schließlich noch Jahre vergehen.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
Quedel83 (2019-02-07 20:16:43+00:00): Hallo Robert, danke für den Input. Gibt's sowas auch für Windows Phone 8.1? Danke auch für den FixMe-Hinweis, wollte aber mal diese Funktion im JOSM ausprobieren ("Änderungen überprüfen lassen"). Die Relationen müssten noch geschaut werden, gerade mit den Abbiegefunktionen an der Ausfahrt zwischen Halberstadt und Harsleben, ich konnte da nicht alle Teilstrecken in die Relation "B79" einbeziehen.
Robert46798 (2019-02-07 21:50:27+00:00): Also es gibt auf jeden Fall GPS-Tracker für das Windows Phone. Aber ob die gut sind und wie die Datenübertragung zu OSM funktioniert - da bin ich überfragt.

Was meinst du mit "alle Teilstrecken in die Relation einbeziehen"? Hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/34157#map=16/51.8746/11.0864) sieht es zumindest plausibel aus. Wobei ich vermutlich den Abzweig zur Baustelle nicht mit in die Relation eintragen würde, sondern nur die vom allgemeinen Verkehr befahrbaren.

Meinst du die Abbiegebeschränkungen auf der Halberstädter Straße/Quedlinburger LS am Kreisel? Die sind auf jeden Fall fehlerhaft. Man braucht immer 2 Wege und einen Punkt. Von - über - nach. Ansonsten kenne ich auch keine Abbiegebeschränkungen an einem Kreisverkehr. Wenn es denn einer ist muss noch ein junction=roundabout und oneway=yes eingetragen werden!

Viele Grüße,
Robert
Jose Luis Infante (2019-02-05 20:17:59+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per les teves edicions.
Si us plau, corregeix el següent:
- la via és highway=service
- i l'àrea és amenity=parking
Amb això, l'editor et donarà més opcions per completar les dades.
Salut!
anthoformo (2019-02-06 09:25:47+00:00): Crec que ho he fet bé. Moltes gràcies!!
katpatuka (2021-06-05 04:50:16+00:00): There is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668489077 around 墨山乡 only tagged with description=历史边界 - do you want to continue or shall I delete the way? ;)
FreedSky (2021-06-07 00:30:11+00:00): plz delete
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
literan (2019-02-05 17:12:24+00:00): Ваше внесение придуманных данных выглядит весьма сомнительным. Зачем вносить это (придуманную среднюю высоту этажа) в данные, если это можно рассчитать рендером? Не говоря уж о том, что массовые правки сначала должны обсуждаться с сообществом. Откатываю.
viloan (2019-02-05 15:57:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-02-28 17:16:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Larmax (2020-08-15 17:20:27+00:00): That street Soukanpohja does not exist...
HSL_HRT (2020-08-17 04:36:12+00:00): Thanks for correcting. Right now I can't recall what this edit was based on, but an obvious mistake from my part.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
pitscheplatsch (2019-02-13 18:28:51+00:00): Hi Sinchrofazatron Sinchrofazatron206!, welcome to OSM.

This changeset should be reviewed by a local contributor. Thanks.

More information: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66936230
maxolasersquad (2019-02-05 18:49:27+00:00): The building tag was removed, but the building is still here. I have added the building tag back. I was here last Friday. I should have noted the name of the new business.
viloan (2019-02-05 16:09:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
andygol (2019-02-05 16:18:42+00:00): There were reverted edits submitted in the next changesets 66888018, 66887818, 66887721, 66887634, 66887536
literan (2019-02-05 17:07:19+00:00): здесь зачем-то испортили мультиполигон здания и перенесли теги адрески на одну из его частей. Откат.
mavl (2019-02-28 17:16:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.