piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
spavulur (2019-06-30 07:10:56+00:00): Hi Andy,
Thanks for looking into this edit. We got a missing road case as per our driver GPS trace over here. The previous edit was made by you 6 years ago which I though might have changed by now as per satellite imagery visuals. Also I identified couple of parked vehicles with associated buildings. Considering these evidences I made these changes. But as per your suggestions I will revert my changes and add the missing road in this case as unmaintained track road by giving Motor vehicle access= not specified. Do let me know if you have any further questions.
change set-71749549

Regards,
spavulur
Rainero (2019-06-16 21:44:57+00:00): Hallo Trula-Trulala,

willkommen bei OSM.
Du hattest bei deinem ersten Edit das Häkchen zur Überprüfung der Bearbeitung gesetzt. Daher melde ich mich nun.

Du hast die richtige Kategorie (amenity=charging_station) verwendet, das paßt also.
Man kann für Ladestationen noch eine Reihe weiterer Informationen hinzufügen, z.B. den Betreiber, dessen Referenznummer, den Steckertyp, das Netzwerk, usw. Das hilft Nutzern herauszufinden, ob die Ladesäule für sie nutzbar ist.
Schau mal hier im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Ein konkretes Beispiel hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6484391380#map=18/48.10747/11.57666

Die neuen Ladesäulen, die du eingetragen hast, sind wahrscheinlich auch von den Stadtwerken München, daher dürften viele Attribute gleich sein.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Galbinus (2019-10-02 11:35:48+00:00): Die Umgehungsstraße Salzkotten wurde meiner Meinung nach verfrüht in OSM eingetragen, da das Planfeststellungsverfahren noch nicht so weit vorangeschritten ist, dass die Trasse feststeht etc. - vgl. https://www.strassen.nrw.de/de/wir-bauen-fuer-sie/projekte/b1-ortsumgehung-salzkotten.html und https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66742
Taya_S (2024-05-18 18:57:38+00:00): (almost) all of this users edits have been reverted. They are all nonsensical and wildly incorrect
Jan Westerhof (2019-06-13 11:32:19+00:00): Het gebouw dat hier was ingetekend, was idd onjuist qua vorm en afmeting. Maar er staat wel degelijk sinds kort een bouwsel (eigen waarneming). Zie https://www.deverbroederij.nl/ en zie ook de BAGviewer (https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=johan%20van%20hasseltweg&resultOffset=0&objectId=0363100012252686&geometry.x=123904&geometry.y=488697&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0363010012143267)
Leo Slager (2019-06-13 12:16:38+00:00): Ja, import is al gevraagd in het forum.
Zie ook de berichtenwisseling van Eggie en mij met de startende mapper.
eggie (2019-06-13 12:24:18+00:00): Het gebouw  staat volgens mijn info nog niet in de data van BGT en/of Kadaster.
Weet niet of import al kan.  Het is wel "voorlopig"  in te tekenen mbv satellietdataportaal.nl (foto maart 2019)
De landuse kan volgen mij het beste ingetekend worden als leisure=garden of wellicht landuse=farmland? Dat komt wel in de buurt van het projectdoel. 
Het grote gebouw dat er stond was eerst ingetekend als parking door een voorgaande mapper. Dat is dus niet het gebouw.
Leo Slager (2019-06-13 12:32:05+00:00): Het gebouw staat inmiddels in de BAG.
Wachten op de import die ik in het forum heb aangevraagd.
eggie (2019-06-13 12:47:11+00:00): prima :)
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-06-14 01:28:52+00:00): 🤔 although my memory might be misleading me, I believe I recall 2 service roads leading into the basement area underneath the building
stevenLAD (2019-06-14 07:09:54+00:00): It is possible - I do not know - but if you have two one way roads without exit, this leads to routing errors. If there are two ways, please add the second one but do join them underground to avoid routing errors
igalex (2019-06-13 09:29:44+00:00): #bloombergservice
peppone84 (2019-06-13 09:41:52+00:00): Source was not osmose, only survey.
mavl (2019-12-08 11:21:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78101903, 78106642, 78104078 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70933401].
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-06-17 02:37:36+00:00): Maturion, UATSN don't have official languages.
corfede (2019-06-17 09:05:39+00:00): Buongiorno, riprovo a scrivervi nei commenti, nonostante in passato non abbiate mai replicato, né risposto al mio tentativo di contatto diretto risalente al 06.03.2018. La richiesta che vi faccio è di dichiarare per favore la provenienza dei vostri dati, visto che inserite nomi di strade nei comuni di tutta Italia. Saluti, Federico.
Gh0stz0x (2019-06-19 08:06:57+00:00): Corfede ha ragione. Spesso anch'io ho tentato di contattarvi chiedendo il source dei vostri dati.
datamove (2019-06-26 12:18:24+00:00): Buongiorno, abbiamo clienti in varie città italiane ai quali chiediamo, quando ci segnalano nomi di vie mancanti, di mandare degli operatori sul campo per verificare la segnalazione e successivamente apportiamo le modifiche necessarie.
Gh0stz0x (2019-06-26 17:40:24+00:00): Wow, ottimo! 
Però rispondi quando ti si fanno domande.
Grazie 😁
taxi301 (2019-06-14 02:07:06+00:00): zmiana organizacji na drodze nr. 162 , węzeł Kołobrzeg zachód ruch jest od 3 dni puszczony górą przez wiadukt
taxi301 (2019-06-14 04:46:11+00:00): https://gazetakolobrzeska.pl/artykul/6719-z_wizyta_na_budowie_drogi_s6_zdjecia_wideo
"Odwiedziliśmy również okolice Węzła Zachód, czyli teren przy Bezprawiu i Rościęcinie. Kierowcy jadący do Gościna nie muszą już w tym miejscu kręcić, a korzystają z wiaduktu nad S6."
Iga | Yanosik (2019-06-14 05:33:33+00:00): Bardzo dziękuję za interwencję. Poprawiłam
taxi301 (2019-06-14 17:02:26+00:00): Dziękuję, obserwowałem kiedy pojawi się na Janosiku i się zdziwiłem . Obwodnica Kołobrzegu była po dobie. W przyszłym tygodniu będzie zmiana na Kołobrzeg wschód .Pozdrawiam
Iga | Yanosik (2019-06-17 06:14:59+00:00): Dziękuję za informację. W Yanosiku kolejna aktualizacja danych mapowych zaplanowana jest dopiero na 26.06.2019. Pozdrawiam
eggie (2019-06-13 10:12:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Graag wel concreet commentaar bij je edits. 
Bv pad toegevoegd aan park
MVG,
Eggie
archie (2019-06-13 10:19:26+00:00): Låt gärna bli att namnge t ex Nissan som redan är namngivet i relationen. Det blir bara en dubblett som jag nu har raderat. Kolla först innan du gör sådana ändringar.
Rostranimin (2019-06-13 12:07:43+00:00): Hi both - (ClarkstonCorrect / crossmyloof) - it looks like you're editing the same change back and forth. Can I suggest that this be taken to a wider group for guidance? Might I also suggest some additional use of changeset comments, comments on closing notes, and similar - all help to keep people cooperating...
Rostranimin (2019-06-13 12:07:36+00:00): Hi both - (ClarkstonCorrect / crossmyloof) - it looks like you're editing the same change back and forth. Can I suggest that this be taken to a wider group for guidance? Might I also suggest some additional use of changeset comments, comments on closing notes, and similar - all help to keep people cooperating...
VictorIE (2024-07-25 12:36:36+00:00): Hi,

Duplicate post office https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696879582/history
4004 (2019-06-13 21:13:24+00:00): здраствуйте и спасибо за добавление,
транслитерация лацинкай в int_name
Sieva (2019-06-14 09:23:18+00:00): Добры дзень. Без праблем 👌
eggie (2019-06-13 10:15:01+00:00): De edits zijn okay, maar het commentaar blijft helaas vaag. Andere lokale mappers stellen het op prijs dat ze kunnen zien wat er is aangepast.
Gr eggie
Warin61 (2019-06-15 02:05:58+00:00): Hi,
This has damaged way 48274092. 
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/613383578
Prusaker (2019-06-13 10:53:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696884114
Is this way really has oneway?
As I can see at satellite map, this segment has both directions movement.
Or at the intersection recently changed the organization of the movement?

At the moment I see a discrepancy in this change and satellite image.
User2 - Lightcyphers (2019-06-13 11:10:34+00:00): so, look now))
Prusaker (2019-06-13 11:22:39+00:00): I also added some clarifications, but I’m not completely sure about the correctness of the information, because I didn’t drive this particular intersection and I don’t have exact information on how the traffic is organized on it. But I suppose that some of the locals will correct us later.
User2 - Lightcyphers (2019-06-13 12:11:46+00:00): okay, t.y.
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-06-13 22:19:59+00:00): Hi stevenLAD, I wanted to let you know that I changed some of the edits you made in this area, I noticed that a 'covered=yes' tag that I had added to the portion of road that comprises 'Estrada de Catete' that passes beneath the portion of the bridge that comprises 'Avenida Comandante Fidel Castro' was extended to portions of the former road that are not underneath the bridge of the latter, I took the liberty of removing the aformentioned tag from those ways, if you think this interferred with the main intention of your edits, please feel free to correct things as you see fit, the following is a visual representation of what I am referring to - [ https://i.imgur.com/zFowEhf.png ] trunk roads take on a pale orange colour with intermittent border when covered
stevenLAD (2019-06-14 07:12:15+00:00): I had seen the change but had not realised that this was because of the tag. Thanks for correcting. I think that it is unnecessary to use this tag though, as defect a bridge covers whatever is underneath ? I leave you to decide
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
zors1843 (2019-06-13 13:44:49+00:00): Beste,
Heb een paar wijzigingen aangebracht (classificatie - onmogelijke eenrichting - motorway junction verwijderd).
Mvg
Kan51 (2019-06-13 17:23:35+00:00): Этот дом, по адресу: Красноармейская улица, 10; а так-же дома по адресам: Кировская улица, 15; Мурманская улица, 21; Мурманская улица, 23 - давно снесены и были удалены с карты в конце мая (пакет правок: 70643436).
literan (2019-06-13 19:32:45+00:00): вы его, наоборот, туда зачем-то включили. Откачу.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
user_5359 (2019-06-16 17:47:32+00:00): Hello! Please check node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6544752018. Did you mean name instead of Mars??
Joško Horvat (2019-06-17 21:39:19+00:00): Corrected Thanks !
This is very attractive Video surveillance company ...
ma-rt-in (2019-06-13 13:11:43+00:00): Hallo,
das ist immer noch nicht richtig. Ich passe es nun mal für dich an. Bitte achte zukünftig darauf.
vg
VictorIE (2019-06-16 20:06:47+00:00): Hi, this post box https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6544747959 02:05 seems like an odd time to collect post. Might it be 14:05?
Cerritus (2019-06-17 16:42:35+00:00): Yes, you're right. It should be 2.05 pm.
Thanks for the hint, I'll just change it! :)
4004 (2019-06-13 20:37:26+00:00): здраствуйте и спасибо за добавление,
вот уж не думал что сони центр в минске будет.
этаж пишем в отдельный тег (1 этаж = 0), поправил
viloan (2019-06-13 11:51:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
iroke (2019-06-17 16:48:00+00:00): This was my first entry and I was not aware of the importantness of "imagery_used" at this point. So I work in this area and while it's true that aerial images helped me find this bike park I was mainly using my own experience to know how that park is structured.
Hope it's fine :)
eggie (2019-06-13 12:26:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-06-13 12:37:08+00:00): Je kunt de tagging
traffic_sign=NL:C06 (Met hoofdletter C) ook op detagging van de  weg zelf zetten.
En volgens mij kun je de richting aangeven met forward of backward.
Uit welke infobron komt die 180.. Ben wel nieuwsgierig?
traffic_sign:direction=forward of backward volgens mij.
(ligt aan de richting van de weg)  
Zelf tag ik de verkeersborden op highway=...  zelf. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-13 12:44:25+00:00): Hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging
staat het allemaal duidelijk uitgelegd.
Wellicht heb je er wat aan.
eggie (2019-06-13 12:46:29+00:00): motor_vehicle:backward=no
motorcycle:backward=yes
moped:backward=yes
mofa:backward=yes
chachafish (2019-06-15 14:31:39+00:00): Hello, I see you named this building as, "390 Interlocken Crescent". Is this correct? Do you have a source for this information? Thanks.
_torsten_ (2020-03-10 20:23:21+00:00): Wie weit ist die Planung der B88 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696906853#map=14/50.8370/10.6921)? Gibt´s da schon eine Planfeststellung? Wenn nicht, sollte dieser Weg nicht in OSM eingetragen werden. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dproposed
_torsten_ (2020-03-10 20:25:18+00:00): (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696905712#map=13/50.8735/10.7186)? Gibt´s da schon eine Planfeststellung? Wenn nicht, sollte dieser Weg nicht in OSM eingetragen werden. Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dproposed
VA00 (2020-08-07 05:02:56+00:00): Te kable idą na powierzchni:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/595220230
Marwis00 (2020-08-07 07:08:32+00:00): poprawione
us2ivb (2019-06-13 19:15:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ваш пакет правок содержит много ошибок. Улица Ленина в Аграфеновке https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126980797 не может быть highway=track и тянуться через несколько полей к другому Н\П. Степная улица тоже не может быть highway=track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126980776 Газовая труба и дороги не должны пересекаться общими точками. Здесь вообще дорога начинается (или заканчивается) на автобусной остановке https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5821428782 Балабино-Русский отрезали highway=track(ом) не добавив новой дороги. И еще много чего...
-off- (2019-06-21 09:07:53+00:00): Добрый день. Подскажите пожалуйста каким образом можно скачать весь свой пакет правок в JOSM, чтобы проверить ошибки. Отрисовкой грунтовок занимался не очень опытный исполнитель и у меня не было времени проверить все перед отправкой.
us2ivb (2019-06-21 14:52:09+00:00): Заходим сюда https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71216059?filters=%7B%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22-off-%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22-off-%22%7D%5D%7D (нужно авторизоваться). Затем вверху нажимаем "Open with" - "JOSM". В Josm должно быть включено удаленное управление https://d.radikal.ru/d04/1906/02/8e323a73c134.jpg
us2ivb (2019-06-21 15:45:18+00:00): Или в Josm нажимаем Файл - Открыть адрес. Вставляем https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71216059 нажимаем скачать.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
kapazao (2019-06-13 14:39:26+00:00): Hola, debes dar información acerca de esto, ni siquiera has indicado una referencia o característica a parte del nombre.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71216144
Xeriz (2019-06-13 20:17:47+00:00): Muy buenas, Lo había añadido a pe de calle con OSmand y se me había pasado añadirle los demás datos, ya lo he actualizado con los datos correctos.

Gracias por el aviso
kapazao (2019-06-14 09:52:43+00:00): De nada, gracias por corregirlo.
Un saludo!
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
viloan (2019-06-13 12:18:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Marc_ch (2019-07-01 10:43:03+00:00): Bonjour,
pourriez-vous mettre une description de modification ? c'est agréable l'interaction dans un projet collaboratif :)
Salutations,
Marc
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Frans S (2019-11-13 15:27:13+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. It's a time ago, but during validating another task I came across your mappings here.
A short remark. Not every light spot is a building .It can be a courtyard or a piece of cultivated ground. Please take notice of there is a shadow. That says it is above ground level and probably a building; otherwise don't map it as a building.
Best regards and keep mapping
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:07:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:08:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:08:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:08:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
andergrin (2019-06-15 04:27:13+00:00): Добрий день. Будь ласка, ознайомтесь з правилами найменування вулиць, що прийняті українською спільнотою OSM 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8#.D0.9F.D0.BE.D1.80.D1.8F.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BA_.D1.81.D0.BB.D1.96.D0.B2_.D1.83_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D1.85_.D0.B2.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B8.D1.86.D1.8C
mavl (2019-07-21 16:08:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:08:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:08:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:08:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:08:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-06-13 13:07:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse. Je edits zullen worden teruggezet. 
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665

Ik heb deze wijzigingen teruggezet.
eggie (2019-06-13 13:10:05+00:00): reverted by changeset  #71218133
mavl (2019-07-21 16:08:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Supaplex (2020-10-09 07:23:46+00:00): 歹勢，基隆太平國小已經廢校了，請別閣加上去
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/71217367
BCNorwich (2019-06-15 07:47:17+00:00): Hello, Way: 696916858 is it a bridge or a culvert (tunnel)? You've tagged it as both. Both bridge or culvert on a footpath can best be a linear feature.

Regards Bernard.
freeExec (2019-06-14 06:03:05+00:00): Если это магазин где продают всего по мелочи, от хлеба до швабры то его отмечают как https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dconvenience
kveselkov (2019-06-14 07:26:05+00:00): Спасибо за ревью
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-06-15 01:23:13+00:00): surely we should have this as a park, as it is with pollok country park?
Tomas Straupis (2019-06-13 15:50:33+00:00): Tvenkinys žymimas landuse=reservoir. Nereikia klausyti jokių iD patarimų keisti žymas, nes didžioji dauguma jų yra neteisingi, nesuderinti su OpenStreetMap bendruomene.
eggie (2019-06-13 13:34:16+00:00): Oke.., maar voor een goede routering moeten er wel corresponderende accesstags op de weg zelf komen. Alleen een bord plaatsen is niet voldoende.
Gr Eggie
nikodll (2019-06-13 13:39:02+00:00): Volgens mij, die heb ik wel toogevoegd:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500761665
Tags
highway	service
mofa	yes
moped	yes
motor_vehicle	private
motorcycle	yes
surface	paving_stones
eggie (2019-06-13 13:45:45+00:00): Oke... Het staat erop zie ik nu.. 
Het zal niet voor auto's routeren. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-06-13 13:48:21+00:00): Denk alleen dat het motor_vehicle = no moet zijn en niet private.. (volgens het verkeersbord dan)
Minh Nguyen (2019-08-17 05:25:16+00:00): These changes largely seem OK to me, but for the future, please note that highway tags in OSM aren’t intended to correspond one-for-one with HFCS. HFCS can be a starting point, but it would be better to look at its criteria and evaluate these roads on your own, perhaps taking those characteristics into consideration.

Whenever you reclassify roads based on an external source, please double-check the roads in any available aerial or street-level imagery to make sure you aren’t propagating errors from that source.

Also, please ensure good connectivity within each highway classification. When possible, avoid making a secondary road terminate at a tertiary road, as with State Line Road in Bright.

Thank you for the care you’re putting into this aspect of the map. If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to me directly or stop by the #indiana channel in OSMUS Slack.
korolenok (2019-06-19 11:34:40+00:00): Please, don't use generic names like a "sidewalk", "path", "footpath" for roads. It looks like a spam on the map.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71218752
assanges (2019-06-13 14:17:21+00:00): 它已經倒了好一陣子了啦 XDDD
yellowsoar (2019-06-13 14:21:20+00:00): 結束營業的店是 Point of Interest (POI) 生命週期的一個階段
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
你有其他的編輯建議嗎？