piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SarahJahs (2018-04-18 13:09:23+00:00): The building still exists, it needs to be labelled 'Westwood Housekeepers' as the office will move from the adjacent building to there.
wolfbert (2018-04-18 16:41:58+00:00): Please revert, the road has indeed been permanently separated by the railway due to reconstruction of the railway platform. The bus relations have to be fixed.
emergency99 (2018-04-18 17:00:56+00:00): Ok, will do. How does the bus operate now?
emergency99 (2018-04-18 17:04:54+00:00): And will the street be restored?
wolfbert (2018-04-18 17:44:09+00:00): No, the change is permanent. I haven't checked the new bus route on site yet (could do in a week or two), but I believe the bus stop has been moved to Ahrenbergerstraße (L5008) near the railway crossing.
Nakaner (2018-04-18 12:48:02+00:00): Hi carpbunker,

your user account does not look to be an account dedicated for imports, does it?  Could you please use a dedicated OSM account for uploading data directly derived from Canvec (also known as "Canvec import")? The Import Guidelines require you to use a dedicated account for imports. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2018-04-18 12:52:47+00:00): Further comments on your imports in that area:

- The imported lakes have too many nodes. You don't need a node every five metres if the shore of the lake is nearly straight. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581002869#map=18/50.17248/-91.41968 There is a JOSM plugin to simplify ways (I forgot its name).

- Please ensure that existing features in the area you import data don't have an offset. If they have any (e.g. the railway line in that area), improve them.

These modifications should happen before you upload your import. Could you please fix these errors in the area of this changeset?
Rps333 (2018-04-18 13:29:05+00:00): This is a import account. 
There are no errors from the data I added. The error are from an earlier canvec import to the west.
Nakaner (2018-04-18 13:38:31+00:00): Hi Rps333,

is that your account? If so, could you please add a note to the profile page?

I thought it isn't an import account because https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58091753 does not look like a gas station import. Or is that changeset just an "accident"? (I myself have three accounts and I sometimes upload things using the wrong account).

The overnoded geometries were uploaded by carpbunker, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5560439040/history for example. The same applies to the railway line which goes swimming at the southernmost point of Marchington Lake. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581002935#map=16/50.1719/-91.4068 (JOSM does not check if railway lines intersect with lakes at the same layer)

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2018-04-18 13:39:16+00:00): Example for such a note on a profile page: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Nakaner-import
Rps333 (2018-04-18 14:34:08+00:00): Sorry carpbunker is my import account.
Rps333 (2018-04-18 14:41:26+00:00): fixed the railway problem. missed that one. I am check all the canvec data vs bring/ DG imagery. Cheers
skorasaurus (2018-05-05 19:50:40+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for editing but in the future; please do not remove the layer tag. 

The layer tag is important and needed to signify that a bridge or other feature is above another feature (like a road).

For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98735409 - the layer=1 tag is needed to demonstrate that the railroad is above and that East 79th does not intersect it. 

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge for more information or feel free to ask me for clarification.
user_5359 (2018-04-18 15:46:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
dikkeknodel (2018-04-18 10:22:45+00:00): This was a reversal of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29434881
See the (lack of) discussion in the changeset.
juhanjuku (2018-04-22 06:49:14+00:00): According to wiki key:hgv can be used on ways and areas, not on nodes. What is the meaning here?
Math1985 (2018-04-18 10:47:04+00:00): Hartelijk dank!
viloan (2018-04-18 10:53:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Marcel Herault (2019-05-14 14:45:21+00:00): Bonjour,
Aucun des commerces que vous avez saisi dans les Halles Bacalan de Bordeaux ne comporte de clé "shop=". Pourriez-vous compléter / préciser ?
Par ailleurs, vous avez utilisés les clés contact:street et contact:city... Pour définir et référencer un lieu, il faut utiliser addr:city / addr:street / addr:postcode, etc.
Cordialement, 
MH
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2019-05-14 14:59:27+00:00): Bonjour,

Effectivement, nous allons modifier les tag shop pour les Halles de Bacalan.
Par contre, nous avions vu avec Cquest sur l'utilisation des contact, ci joint un cc de nos échanges :
Le problème pour moi est plutôt indiquer l'adresse d'un POI avec addr:*
plutôt que contact:* car le POI n'est pas "l'adresse", mais à l'adresse...

On a du coup des positions d'adresses souvent peu homogènes lorsqu'on abuse
des addr:*

Ensuite ça s'aggrave quand on doublonne en un vrai point définissant
l'adresse et un addr:* rajouté à un POI proche.

Dans les scripts BANO, il y a un traitement spécifique lorsqu'on a de
multiples addr:* pour une même adresse, pour éliminer ceux qui
potentiellement devraient être un contact:*, en regardant si il y a
d'autres tags (shop, etc)... mais c'est un pis aller.

Cordialement,
Marcel Herault (2019-05-14 15:06:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la modif de stags shop.
En revanche, pour les adresses, je ne vous suis pas totalement. Et même si j'ai beaucoup de respect pour le travail de Cquest sur BANO, je ne crois pas qu'il faille utiliser cette façon de taguer, encore plus sans préciser addr:housenumber. 
Cordialement,
MH
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2019-05-14 15:25:30+00:00): Bonjour, 
en juillet 2017, nous avions eu un échange avec différentes personnes au sujet des adresses addr* ou contact:addr* dont voici un autre extrait :
"L'administration n'attribue pas une adresse à un café, à un magasin ou 
une boite aux lettre.
Elle attribue l'adresse à une parcelle/bâtiment.
La notion de parcelle n'est pas crée dans osm et parfois imprécis sur le 
terrain.
Je persiste donc à penser que l'adresse devrait se trouver sur le 
bâtiment ou sur son entrée.
c'est d'ailleurs la seule façon d'éviter les erreurs de devinettes quand 
les bâtiments ne sont pas en rang d'ognon en bord de rue.
Je pense qu'on devrait ouvrir un chantier pour finaliser la doc.
Parce qu'une carte qui laisse autant d'incertitude dans les adresses, je 
trouve que c'est problématique. surtout pour les cas aussi simple qu'une 
adresse par bâtiment."
En attendant une finalisation de la gestion des adresses, nous avons fait évoluer notre méthode et passé les adresses en contact et non plus en addr* pour ne pas générer des doublons sur bano. 

Contact:* à mon sens sont des informations en plus, présentes sur le point mais non primordiales.

Nous allons donc ajouter les clé "shop", c'est une erreur de notre part, elles auraient due être présentes. Merci de votre message et de votre alerte.
Cordialement
Marcel Herault (2019-05-14 15:30:11+00:00): Merci pour vos éclaircissements.

Bonne continuation.

MH
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2019-05-14 15:31:35+00:00): De rien, 
merci à vous pour vos remarques constructives.
Cordialement
Alain
Sowa1980 (2019-07-25 14:40:23+00:00): Привет. Поясни свои действия за чем ты удаляешь и объединяешь лес, там где он не является одним контуром? За чем ты делаешь мульти полигоны, ломая контуры правильно отрисованных объектов, собирая не пойми, что из мультиполигонов? Поясни свои удаления объектов.
Жду ответа, Долго смотрел на твои художества но прости сил уже нет больше терпеть это. Жду ответа. Если нет жалоба уйдёт в DWG.
Sowa1980 (2019-07-25 14:58:15+00:00): Прости , мне не очень хочется писать на тебя, жалобу , остановись приди в себя и исправь, те места , которые ты испортил.
literan (2018-04-18 12:50:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за правки, но я не понимаю, зачем вы все полигоны продублировали точками? я удалю их.
Warp-l (2018-04-18 13:08:31+00:00): Я думал, что полигон - это область, а точка - именно точка интереса. Учту на будущее. Как я понимаю, полигон предпочтительнее точки, если объект большой площади?
literan (2018-04-18 13:18:48+00:00): да, именно так. Можно объект обозначить точкой, если лень или неизвестны его границы. Но одно из базовых правил OSM - "один объект на местности - один объект в базе" - поэтому только что-то одно. Соответственно, если одна больница - то и тег amenity=hospital только на одном объекте должен стоять, например.
Warp-l (2018-04-18 13:20:58+00:00): Немного запутался тогда. Смотрите, у нашей больницы большая территория, на ней много строений. То есть мне сделать большой полигон "больница" а внутри маленькие полигоны? При этом, маленьким полигонам тег "больница" давать не надо?
literan (2018-04-18 13:26:49+00:00): а территория одна большая или из кусков состоит? И не совсем понял, зачем маленькие полигоны, для чего?
Warp-l (2018-04-18 13:30:29+00:00): Ну, есть большая территория больницы. Внутри этой территории множество корпусов, дорожек, пруды и другие объекты. Большой полигон, получается, вся территория (внешний забор), а внутри - эти самые строения, связанные между собой сетью пешеходных и автомобильных дорожек.
literan (2018-04-18 13:38:51+00:00): Ну вот на большую территорию больницы (обычно это забор) вешаем тег amenity=hospital, название больницы и контакты. На больничные здания вешаем building=hospital, адреску + название, если оно есть (name=Приемное отделение и т.п.), плюс если имеются свои контактные данные, то тоже вешаем. Вот пример https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69858615/history#map=17/55.80492/37.45709
user_5359 (2018-04-18 15:42:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I see only one highway on the aerial images not two.
BittysRealm (2018-04-18 19:08:15+00:00): Hi user_5359, are you referring to the north-side drive way?
user_5359 (2018-04-18 19:11:03+00:00): You change only line in this change set see the link https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581209230.
Peilscheibe (2018-04-18 20:58:10+00:00): Hallo weillentin,

nicht alles was grün ist ist ein Park. In einem anderen Changeset habe ich ja bereits einige Hinweise und Links kommuniziert.
Bitte lies viel im Wiki, auch wenn das anfangs aufwendig erscheint. 
Eine gute Adresse, um Antworten auf allerlei Fragen zu bekommen ist die Stuttgarter OSM-Community. Die findest Du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stuttgart/Stammtisch
http://lists.openstreetmap.de/mailman/listinfo/stuttgart
Grüße, P.
Myazyk (2018-08-14 18:36:14+00:00): Ти впевнений, що ця хата має номер 6 і що вона прикріплена до вулиці Гранітної?
Бо у мене є інфо, що вона належить до вул Ровенської під номером 2
Peilscheibe (2018-04-18 21:00:50+00:00): Hallo nochmal,

schau Dir bitte mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:water%3Dreservoir an und überlege, ob das mit Deiner Änderung zusammenpasst.
Danke und Grüße, P.
Peilscheibe (2018-04-18 21:13:28+00:00): Im Übrigen: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
Mitrovica map (2018-04-19 06:57:28+00:00): 555
abakus_uploader (2018-04-18 22:41:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Peilscheibe (2018-04-18 20:47:45+00:00): Hallo weillentin, willkommen bei OSM.

Diese Änderungen habe ich rückgängig gemacht, weil: 
1. Ein Naturschutzgebiet ist ein Naturschutzgebiet.
2. Das Verkehrszeichen, das Du hier quer durch den Wald geschoben hast, steht immer noch an seinem ursprünglichen Platz.

Wenn Du nicht nur Parks für Pokemons anlegen möchtest sondern ernsthafte Kartenarbeit machen willst, mache Dich bitte mit den Grundlagen von OSM vertraut. Ein paar Links zum Einstieg liste ich hier mal auf:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/help
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap
http://learnosm.org/de/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions
Grüße, P.
Peilscheibe (2018-04-18 21:12:38+00:00): Ein bisschen viel Parks auf einmal für einen Neueinsteiger. Ich habe das rückgängig gemacht. http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
abakus_uploader (2018-04-18 22:41:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Peilscheibe (2018-04-18 21:13:00+00:00): Ein bisschen viel Parks auf einmal für einen Neueinsteiger. Ich habe das rückgängig gemacht. http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
EugenyN (2018-04-18 18:58:44+00:00): объясните, пожалуйста, подробнее. что значит tourism=picnic_site на кладбище ?
Lokai (2018-04-18 13:27:23+00:00): Hallo weillentin, schön dass du bei OSM bist. Deine Kartierungen mit den Parkanlagen finde ich nicht immer passend. Schon mal was von Pokemons gehört?
viloan (2018-04-18 12:29:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Nakaner (2018-04-18 12:40:27+00:00): Hi,

you seem to be part of a paid/organized/commercial editing activity. Please add a note to your profile page at openstreetmap.org (editable via your user settings at openstreetmap.org) which states which company/organisation you belong to, who pays you for editing and which software, technology and rules you use to determine which roads you edit.

Which website do you use to edit OpenStreetMap (content of address bar please)? iD 2.4.1 is not running at openstreetmap.org.

Please add that information and answer all questions before you upload any further edits to OpenStreetMap. Otherwise we will block your accounts and revert all your edits!

Please spread this message among your workmates. It applies to everyone of your "team".

Best regards

Michael
apm-wa (2018-05-27 12:13:26+00:00): You have added roads that do not exist in Awaza, Turkmenbashy, Turkmenistan.  Please advise me why you have done this.  I am removing these nonexistent roads.  Please use the Digital Globe Premium imagery.
apm-wa (2018-05-27 14:34:46+00:00): You also apparently vandalized several streets in the Awaza resort zone, which I have repaired.  I have reported your apparent vandalism to the Data Working Group.  If you have a cogent explanation for this apparent vandalism, please provide it.
adrianojbr (2018-05-14 01:55:03+00:00): só para lembrar, se for o casso de apagar o nó adicionado para teste. abraço.
Tomio (2018-05-15 14:20:28+00:00): Obrigado pela lembrança. O ponto será apagado.
TheSwavu (2018-04-23 23:14:48+00:00): Hi,

This mostly looks OK but you have two overlapping buildings:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581234063
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581234049

you should delete the second one.

Thanks for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58199574
Cascafico (2018-04-19 08:10:44+00:00): Forse è meglio cambiare il tag note in description (note dovrebbe essere per i mappatori).
Sulla croce di vetta, ho trovato cercando  nella wiki, che si usa  summit:cross=yes sul nodo del natural=peak
rikmede (2018-04-19 10:23:07+00:00): Ciao, il punto in cui è situata la croce non è una cima quindi non ha il nodo. E' un punto panoramico in cui hanno installato una croce. Cercando su internet ho trovato che una croce, che non sia croce di vetta si può taggare come "wayside_cross". Secondo te come è meglio fare?
Cascafico (2018-04-19 11:21:43+00:00): Ho capito. quindi il sentiero non finisce ma passa accanto alla croce... ovviamente in qs caso waySIDE è il suo trag :-)
abakus_uploader (2018-04-18 22:41:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Lokai (2018-04-18 13:13:24+00:00): Hallo willkommen bei OSM.
Es gibt bei iD eine Funktion Gebäude rechtwinklig zu machen. Z.B. Taste s.

Viel Spaß
Nordbier (2018-04-18 13:19:13+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
domod (2018-04-22 13:31:41+00:00): Dear Shola Imabeh, these edits seem to be wrong, or look as if someone has been playing. Is it possible that you accidentally saved some test edits, or that someone else used your account? I would be glad if you could review the changes and correct or undo them.
SeanMcGoldrick (2018-04-23 17:30:25+00:00): you have swords and donabate in one area
domod (2018-04-22 18:38:05+00:00): Dear NikkiS1912, these edits seem to be wrong, or look as if someone has been playing. Is it possible that you accidentally saved some test edits, or that someone else used your account? I would be glad if you could review the changes and correct or undo them.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-04-24 14:46:44+00:00): I have reverted this here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58376295
user_5359 (2018-04-18 15:38:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Unfortunatelythe information exists, I merge your information.
legofahrrad (2022-02-10 17:53:59+00:00): Hey!
Namen werden bei OpenStreetMap nur als Eigennamen von Objekten verwendet. Hier als Beschreibung sind sie unpassend und falsch.
Schau dir diese Seite im Wiki an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Viele Grüße!
viloan (2018-04-18 13:16:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Lokai (2018-04-19 18:05:27+00:00): Hallo nochmals. Benutze bitte esri Luftbilder. Deine Gebäude haben einen deutlichen Versatz. Viel Spaß
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-04-18 15:33:11+00:00): Hi, you asked for a review. Similar to before ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58201510#map=19/53.39172/-6.17992 ), square buildings are nice. :)

You've added one long building here, tagged as "terrace", but looking on the aerial imagery, it looks more like several separate semi-d's, with side passages between then. It doens't look at "solid" as the terrace to the right. Are you sure this is one single building or should it be split?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-04-18 15:27:20+00:00): You asked for a review, and this looks fine, except for my advice about S in the previous comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58201510
chachafish (2018-04-27 12:16:05+00:00): Hello, thank you for contributions. Quite a few of the roads you have added cross paths, but you did not add a connecting node. Can you review your edits and correct them? If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Thank you :)
BogDan_Olegovich (2018-05-24 19:11:43+00:00): Hello! Thank you for flagging this, we found a bug and these issues are fixed.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-04-18 15:19:41+00:00): Hi. You asked for a review of this change.

This looks OK. One suggestion is to use the S button on iD (i.e. press S on your keyboard) when you have selected a building, and it will make the corners right angled. That's closer to how they are in the real world. It also takes the pressure off you, the mapper, because you don't have to be totally right and can be rough and the computer will clean it up.

You have this as "building=terrace" and I think "house" is more accurate. This building looks like a semi-d, right? So that's a house (technically 2 hourses), not a terrace row.