piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2020-07-28 13:30:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88623953 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88500331].
berndw (2020-07-26 06:53:08+00:00): Mal wieder,

Dem Namen nach sind zwei der Objekte Kunstwer  auf dem Platz stehen mehrere   und ein Kreuz
Keines davon ist eine Gedenkstätten, sondern sie haben eigene Taggs.

Würdest du das bitte  endlich berücksichtigen?

Wir haben keine Lust  immer hinter dir aufzuräumen!

Bernd
Hotami (2020-07-26 07:54:58+00:00): не корректно внесено изменения в название улицы, когда фактический данная улица называется Максуджон Танбури, ее переименовали в улицу Хаким Карим.
mavl (2020-07-28 13:30:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88623953 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88500331].
mavl (2020-07-28 13:30:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88623953 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88500331].
mavl (2020-07-28 13:30:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88623953 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88500331].
mavl (2020-07-28 13:30:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88623953 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88500331].
mavl (2020-07-28 13:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88623953 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88500331].
mavl (2020-07-28 13:25:17+00:00): Здравствуйте, Barbaros111.  
  
Этот пакет правок продолжает дорогу, хотя дальше эта дорога не идёт.  
  
Кроме того, участники сообщают, что другие ваши изменения также не соответствуют состоянию местности.  
  
В связи с этим, все ваши изменения будут отменены. Пожалуйста, добавляйте на карту только существующие объекты.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
Supaplex (2020-07-27 06:11:55+00:00): 台大的鹿鳴堂應該淨空了，不應該有小木屋鬆餅
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-07-25 16:36:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 88422908, 88423144, 88456412, 88458966, 88462820, 88468256, 88474123, 88495786, 88495808.
user_11166885 (2020-07-28 18:53:02+00:00): Ciao. come mai hai riaggiunto il ref della SP14 tra San Rocco e Lazzaretto? Nonostante ci siano varii pdf della RAFVG.
Leo Slager (2020-07-26 16:00:39+00:00): Met de editor iD worden de wegen die je toevoegt aan de route achter aan de route geplakt. En dan is de route dus gebroken.
Routerelaties kun je eigenlijk alleen met JOSM op de goede manier aanpassen.
Leo Slager (2020-07-26 16:08:00+00:00): Is het een bewijzerde route ? 
Zo ja, dan zou ik er niets aan veranderen.
Als het niet bewijzerd is: up to you.
MerlinPendragon (2020-07-25 17:10:52+00:00): Hi there,

Do you do any kind of review of these buildings before importing them? I know that the Franklin County building data has a number of issues, most notably splitting a single building into several due to porches/overhangs/etc (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830069042 for a particularly egregious example of this).
rayleigh1 (2020-07-25 17:12:21+00:00): Hey there,

I look through the buildings I add using Mapbox Sattelite imagery, should I merge buildings with their other parts such as the mentioned porches/everhangs/etc.?
MerlinPendragon (2020-07-25 17:14:40+00:00): If it is a single building, then it generally should be mapped as a single building unless there is a good reason to do so (for example, individual shops in a strip mall are often mapped individually even though they're technically all part of the same building).
rayleigh1 (2020-07-25 17:17:24+00:00): Alright, I'll take care to merge them where appropriate, thanks! Is there anything else I should keep in mind?
MerlinPendragon (2020-07-25 17:21:31+00:00): I think that's the biggest thing to keep in mind with this particular dataset. I also usually try to make the tags as specific as possible (tagging houses with building=house and garages with building=garage, for example) rather than just tagging everything with building=yes, but that's not strictly necessary.
rayleigh1 (2020-07-25 17:36:09+00:00): I think some buildings would benefit from simplification (there are often nodes on straight edges). I will probably do a large pass with AreaSimplifier sometime in the future.
4004 (2020-07-28 12:13:06+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку. в случае, если где то стоят ворота, стоит отметить ворота, а не разрезать дорогу. пешеходам, например, там же можно пройти?
AndersAndersson (2020-07-28 13:55:24+00:00): Hej!
Behöver denna vara en relation?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11347285
novabeat (2020-08-05 17:42:57+00:00): Bra fråga... det är ett hus så jag antar det... men jag är ingen OSM expert
novabeat (2020-08-05 17:43:34+00:00): ett enda hus menar jag
kapazao (2020-07-26 14:50:11+00:00): Hello, in Spain the word "bar" is a pub.
Please do not use uppercase words, in this case it should be "Paco Cabezas".
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88501844
eggie (2020-07-25 18:13:07+00:00): Dag Simon,
Graag concreet commentaar bij je uploads zodat andere lokale mappers kunnen zien wat je toegevoegd hebt.
Brandgangen kun je op access=private zetten. Dat voorkomt ongewenst mee routeren in routeplanners. 
MVG,
Eggie
SimonvanG (2020-07-25 18:15:20+00:00): Added multiple walkways behind houses, and added multiple driveways
eggie (2020-07-25 18:42:51+00:00): Okay... jolly good!
Eggie
czubi (2020-08-15 08:40:57+00:00): Stein zum Sitzen ist kein Eigenname und gehört nicht in name
berndw (2020-07-25 19:59:21+00:00): Hallo Mockthar

Du hast in diesem Changeset die Zufahrt von der Emser Strae(B49) zur Pfafendorfer Brücke durch eine Barriere blockiert.

Ist dort wirklich eine Sperrung der Auffahrt?

Bernd
kamizawa (2020-07-26 07:42:47+00:00): Ja, dort ist ein Gitter aufgestellt, Durchfahrt nur für Fahrräder oder Fußgänger.
kamizawa (2020-07-26 07:50:31+00:00): Leider wird das auf der Fahrradroute als Blockiert dargestellt, obwohl ich bicylce auf yes gestellt habe, kannst Du das verbessern?
berndw (2020-07-26 12:28:50+00:00): Aus der Ferne kann ich gar nichts machen, sieht ziemlich schwierig aus

Womit möchtest Du denn dort routen?

Die Regeln für Fahrräder auf der Brücke sind komplex, die Straße ist als trunk und trunk_link getaggt ist. Das impliziert foot und bicycle=no, dieses wird aber durch foot und bicycle=official wieder aufgehoben. Das ist das erste Problem

Da die Fuss- und Radwege auf der Brücke sichtbar getrennt sind, ja, ich weiß, sind straßenbegleitend, würde ich die separat als path erfassen dann sollte das Routing funktionieren.

Dann gibt es an der Auffahrt noch ein contruction=* das ist die zweite Möglichkeit eines Problems

Hast Du irgendwelche Fotos?

Dann kann man zumindest ein paar Sachen korrigieren

Bernd
Something B (2020-07-25 22:33:50+00:00):  Hi, @user_5359!
Please do not delete useful information. In this case, it was possible to add a main tag, for example "amenity=bar".
Regards,
Something B.
user_5359 (2020-07-26 04:26:37+00:00): I am happy to correct the negligence of other contributors. The name also allows a different interpretation (amenity=bar or amenity=restaurant), therefore the deletion is justified without further information. In addition, the contributor of the name has been informed.
Something B (2020-07-26 08:08:09+00:00): I also fix bugs after other contributors. In this case, I would add a "fixme" without removing the node.
Regards,
Something B.
rayleigh1 (2020-07-25 18:37:46+00:00): This changeset shall serve as a small test — I want to see whether the SimplifyArea plugin can handle large amounts of data without breaking.

If no necessary nodes have been deleted, I will proceed to simplify a larger amount of buildings here.
Protoxenus (2023-04-22 19:57:17+00:00): Gibt es hier zwei unterschiedliche Möglichkeiten zu Campen?
SHARCRASH (2021-01-21 19:59:09+00:00): Hi!
Unless there has been a new service road constructed, which i doubt very much because of the surrounding wall and the orchard, this way that you had plotted straight as a service road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830090011 is rather a track and ends with a small passage between walls. Can you confirm please? otherwise, please use the correct tag according the consensus in OSM's Wiki as this is very misleading.
spuseldange (2021-01-22 06:25:53+00:00): Hi Sharcrash,
There has been construction work in the meantime. I will send you pictures from the new situation..
SHARCRASH (2021-01-22 11:15:12+00:00): Sorry, my bad! I really didn't expect it and shouldn't have changed it then. I reverted it back to previous state. No need for the photos, i believe you. Thank you for the reply!
eggie (2020-07-25 19:05:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review... Construction=cycleway nog even verwijderen. (specificatie van de weg in aanleg) 
incline .. is voor bergpaden en foot=yes hoeft niet op een fietspad. Dat is default.
Kijk je nog even naar je edits?
MVG,
Eggie
Kai Johnson (2023-07-17 14:55:42+00:00): I'm not sure if the changes to these features in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138124313 are appropriate. Could you review them?
GinaroZ (2020-08-03 16:04:08+00:00): Wondering why you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500543477/history from shop=model to hobby?
Djminisite (2020-08-03 18:22:06+00:00): That will have been accidental, I'm about to login now to make some changes - I'll flip it back! Thank you for pointing it out
eggie (2020-07-25 19:16:37+00:00): Hi Van temblor.. Better remove the name= Station Wijchen..
No names on a watertap please.
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-25 19:32:01+00:00): name removed.. position changed more north
◪ Jarv (2020-07-26 02:00:19+00:00): On the Eastern approach to the railway you have moved the traffic lights to node 7747294016, while before it was on one ~20 metres to the East.
I cycled through this 4 days ago and it has not moved back to its pre-2018 position
SK53 (2020-07-26 14:09:40+00:00): Ah, sorry the position looked very odd & so I checked against Mapillary traces. As the railway line was missing bridges and pedestrian crossings I just thought it was misplaced and dinnt check if it had recently been updated. I'll change it back.

The bridge looks to be a low bridge, but I couldnt see a minimum height marker on Mapillary. I did add lanes =1.
SK53 (2020-07-26 15:50:07+00:00): Ah, I've reviewed this again and the traffic light position as it was originally was too far East, roughly in line with first house to the S, or around 50 m (has been at that location for a very long time, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/212763059/history), and for some reason thought I couldn't see the position on Bing. I presume the road is closed from the traffic signal on the Washingborough side. My changes are here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88524613, but I suspect it's best if you review them again. 

Is the road 40 mph beyond the traffic light too? In Mapillary there looks to be a traffic light mounted on the light pillar just by the service road immediately after the bridge. Does this mean access from the service road is/was signal controlled?

The B1190 under the bridge is tagged access=no, but with foot, horse & bicycle all set to yes which over-rides the access=no. It presume this is intended to provide access to the temporary path. (BTW I'm not really sure that designated really has any specific meaning in the UK: sometimes it is an old way of marking a PRoW, but we dont have anything like the german usage - if a cycle path is designated cyclists have to use it not the adjacent road ).

I can now see why you noticed this, there's a lot going on.

Regards,

Jerry aka SK53
◪ Jarv (2020-07-27 12:43:15+00:00): So at the moment the road is closed between March and August (maybe later) due to construction works for the A15 Lincoln Bypass. Beyond the last house the road is closed, however there is still access for pedestrians, cyclists and maybe horses too, however here they share the main road as the pavement is part of the road way (and the pavement is extremely narrow under the bridge) - for this reason I've mapped the access as it is currently. Beyond the bridge the diversion for peds, cyclists use a temp path beside the railway embankment.
Max height is:
4.6m
15'3"
As the area is under construction still, the speed limit isn't clear, however there may be a chance that it would be reduced from 40 to 30 between the new roundabout and the current 30 zone. (the whole area between the roundabout and village has street lighting & cannot see any signs saying otherwise)

heres a video of going through the area if it clears things up a bit
https://youtu.be/8GVYUAgz5tg
SK53 (2020-07-27 19:20:23+00:00): Thanks, I'll add the maxheight, and see if I can check any bridges further S (often a railway was built to same tolerances so its a good way to track other missing height restrictions).

I'd noticed the street lights but hadn't added them as lit=yes. Sounds like you're tracking the ring road changes pretty thoroughly (we did this on the A46 a whole 9 years ago http://sk53-osm.blogspot.com/2011/05/along-fosse-way-mapping-new-road.html & Kev - mentioned in the post - tweets nice videos similar to yours).

In principle I'm just adding rooftop solar power across North Kesteven, but a consequence is one notices lots of things (next up I'll be asking about bridleways near Brant Broughton :-) ). Now off to find out the status of the Quaker Meeting House in that village.
Dodko (2022-02-28 10:04:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830095863/history
Do name sa nepíše adresa, ani addr:unit sa na slovensku nepoužíva, opravil som.
Jakuje (2022-03-26 20:40:56+00:00): K https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793389808 -- to neni plot, ale zabradli, takze si myslim, ze ten fixme muzeme smazat, co ty na to?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fence_type
pio2_122 (2020-07-25 20:01:17+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś wszystkie drzewa wzdłuż ul. Kupczyka? Nie nachodzą one na obszar lasu.
JulesGabrielVerne (2020-07-26 09:53:16+00:00): bo ich nie ma. jechałem wczoraj tą drogą i między ścieżką rowerową a drogą niema drzew
pio2_122 (2020-07-26 09:54:14+00:00): Dzięki za informację, wszystko jasne :)
Leo Slager (2020-07-26 15:47:09+00:00): De Kozakkenput is slechts een grens om een deel van het gebied af te bakenen.
Liever niet vastmaken aan allerlei wegen.
De opmerking over een wandelroute begrijp ik niet. Die grens maakt geen deel uit van een wandelroute.
Eric Ferguson (2020-07-26 22:34:56+00:00): Natuurlijk moet je administratieve grenzen en ways nooit aan elkaar vastmaken.  

Maar de kozakkenput is ook een plek in het landsachap (ziet er uit als een beige druppel, net boven het midden van de oranje rand van de bijgaande kaart). 

Kozakkenput is ook de naamvan een 8-vormige 12 km wandelroute van Utrechts Landschap.  Die mot ik even herleggen over de juiste paden, en niet over ruiterpaden.  dus moet ik JOSM leren.
Leo Slager (2020-07-26 23:16:17+00:00): Met JOSM beginnen is een kwestie van even wennen. Na een paar weken wil je niets anders meer gebruiken.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
M_Kucha (2020-07-27 13:55:37+00:00): Hallo Pathumthani,
bitte höre doch damit auf, im Knotenpunktsystem Friesland nicht nur Deine, sondern auch von mir in den letzten Tagen erstellte Routen aus meiner Sicht planlos zu löschen. Als Beispiel sei die 18-37 westlich von Varel genannt, die ich erst am 23. erstellt habe, nur damit sie von Dir zwei Tage später wieder zerstört zu werden. Ich habe in insgesamt zwei Urlauben mit mehreren Tagen  die Knotenpunktrouten abgeradelt und möchte nun nicht mit Dir in einen Editwar geraten.
Gern tausche ich mich mit Dir aus, wenn Du mir Deine Beweggründe für Deine Löschaktionen miteilst, die eben nicht nur von Dir erstellt Informationen umfassen.
Gruß Martin
Pathumthani (2020-07-27 14:16:24+00:00): Message folgt an Account!
Pathumthani
Pathumthani (2020-07-27 15:24:43+00:00): meine völlig andere Sichtweise hast Du bekommen!
eggie (2020-07-25 20:54:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-25 21:43:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tip.. Eigenlijk zou de info bijgetagd moeten worden met de adresnode.
Dan is het adres aan de info gekoppeld.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-25 21:45:29+00:00): .. en klopt het webadres nog?
Jaap Stoeller (2020-07-25 22:00:17+00:00): Het webadres is www.moeke.nl/nijmegen
eggie (2020-07-26 05:31:50+00:00): aangepast aan website en info samengevoegd met adresnode.
Carto'Cité (2020-08-19 14:20:12+00:00): Bonjour.

Great thanks for adding the footway to walk around the construction site at Chaville-Velizy, this is extremely useful.

I'm slightly surprised that you converted sidewalk=left to sidewalk:left=yes on a couple of highways. I understand the logic, which is consistent with cycleways, however this form is not documented on the wiki and much less common : only a few thousands sidewalk:left=* compared to 120,000 sidewalk=left (and 270,000 sidewalk=right). Is there any particular reason why you made this change ?

Regards,
Antoine from Carto’Cité, project #CartoTransilien
skquinn (2020-07-30 07:29:03+00:00): Hi,

Please note the official name is now Domino's (the possessive, not the plural, and no "Pizza" in the name). I have made the appropriate corrections.
marczoutendijk (2020-08-12 08:28:26+00:00): DWG reverted in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89290106

User Northridge 8 is blocked

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
user_4493657 (2020-07-25 22:19:45+00:00): Opis brzmiał "okolice Czarnkowa poprawki" z niewiadomego powodu opis został ucięty. Podobną sytuację miałem z opisem drogi pożarowej zamiast "droga pożarowa 25" w tagu pozostał opis jedynie D .
Frans S (2020-07-26 10:56:41+00:00): Reviewed at random on OSMCHa. Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88508405
Frans S (2020-07-26 11:11:18+00:00): Reviewed at random. Mappings are fine and rather accurate. See my PM
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88508458
5m4u9 (2021-09-23 02:17:49+00:00): hi, in some edits I saw that you edited the border of the national park unintentionally, when you edit in the iD editor it is possible to "hide" the relations of the protected areas or boundaries of municipalities/ departments that impair the editing.

Once in the editor, press the F key, go to section "map features" and unclick "boundaries".
Benito Rivera y Quiroga (2021-09-23 07:41:44+00:00): Thank you for your commentary. From now I will be more attentive to this point and I will unclick "boundaries" in order to avoid unnecessary mistakes.
5m4u9 (2021-09-23 23:23:46+00:00): Cool! I use "hide" features for focus mapping in some map feature. For example, when I want to map rivers, I hide all features minus landuse and waterways. Or when I want to map woodlands, I hide all features minus landuse.
seattlefyi (2020-07-26 21:13:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating the map, this is useful and appreciated! When you deleted this music shop, you also deleted the address info, which should be left in for the next tenant! Please do not remove the entire node; just remove the out-of-date tags. You can do this in your editor (OsmAnd) under Actions->Modify POI->Advanced Tab. There you can delete attributes like "name", "shop", "opening_hours", "website" one at a time by clicking the 'x'. (I've already restored this last removed address.) Thanks!
landini (2020-07-27 15:03:35+00:00): Hallo aquarius, das nördliche Gebäude ist sicher keine Garage sondern ein normales Gebäude mit Schulungsräumen und Büro. 
Bitte auch die genaue Lage überprüfen, ich bin nicht mit dem gps-Gerät ums Haus gegangen, sondern habe die Lage an Hand meiner Fotos abgeschätzt.

Beste Grüße
Richard
aquarix (2020-07-28 07:44:53+00:00): Hallo landini,
beim nördlichen Gebäude stimme ich dir auf jeden Fall zu. Deswegen hat es auch building=yes. Das südliche Gebäude hat building=garage. Bei den Namen habe ich jeweils das genommen, was am Gebäude angeschrieben steht.
Das Zwischengebäude dient vermutlich einfach nur als Übergang. Ob es da einen Namen braucht kann man diskutieren. 
Ich bin auch nicht mit dem GPS Gerät drum herum gegangen, aber ich hab den Gebäudekomplex bewusst noch weiter nach Westen verschoben, weil der Platz davor bzw. der Abstand zur Straße recht groß ist. Anhang von einem Foto würde ich so auf 15-20 m schätzen.
Gruß aquarix
landini (2020-07-27 15:06:44+00:00): Hallo aquarix, hat dir mein horse=dismount nicht gefallen? Nenn mir bitte eine e-mail-adresse, dann schicke ich dir das Foto.

Beste Grüße
Richard
user_4493657 (2020-07-26 00:08:53+00:00): Znowu to samo.
Miało być "Trzcianka kilka nowych POI, dróg."
Supaplex (2020-07-26 02:53:44+00:00): 太平岭核电站
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88508864
skquinn (2020-08-13 10:29:54+00:00): Hi,

What is your source for the opening_hours values in this changeset?
korolenok (2020-07-31 18:47:02+00:00): There is invalid tagging. Please, don't use building tag for areas. Fixed in the changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/88794844/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88509028
marc__marc (2022-08-27 11:21:21+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux-dire LMCU:NOM_ARRET et LMCU:OBJECTID  ?
et svp renseigner la source de vos changeset :)
Cordialement,
Marc
MacLondon (2022-08-30 01:39:17+00:00): LMCU:NOM_ARRET et LMCU:OBJECTID ont été ajoutés à https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1670199377, une partie de https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14247809
user_4493657 (2020-07-26 02:11:04+00:00): Miało być "Smolarnia i okolice aktualizacja"
aharvey (2020-08-16 00:50:46+00:00): I re tagged some of these as driveways
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-10-05 20:53:23+00:00): Boa noite, neste ponto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7712215055 Você deixou a avenida corrego sapo desconectada da nova via que cruza sobre o corrego do sapo. porque fez assim? E também esta via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855627025 deveria ser mão de única correto?
aharvey (2020-08-16 00:33:26+00:00): I've changed this to service=driveway as it's a better fit for roads which exist just to get from the main road to your house.
user_8334278 (2020-07-26 03:28:45+00:00): there are no streams going into the lake only dry ravine's