piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2018-04-27 22:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-27 02:21:50+00:00): Is that sidewalk really running all the way around that building, and the other into a wall?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58459353
Shmallory0 (2018-04-27 02:35:49+00:00): There is a sidewalk all the way around the building. It is the Expo center where the county fair is held.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58459353
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-27 02:50:41+00:00): OK.  Might doublecheck the geometry, one of your new footways is in a wall.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58459353
Shmallory0 (2018-04-27 02:54:22+00:00): I will look to correct.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58459353
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-27 02:55:05+00:00): Thanks!
Tim Couwelier (2018-04-27 09:38:19+00:00): Ter info: Ik heb je changeset hier ongedaan gemaakt (of toch de tagging als leisure = park).

Die was hier ongepast. Op zich geen probleem dat je (los van motivatie) vooral parken gaat taggen, maar dit is wel degelijk een bos en geen park. Beetje te ambitieus..
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-27 02:24:09+00:00): Was this sidewalk recently built?  I'm not seeing any evidence of it on DigitalGlobe, Bing, or Esri imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58459627
Shmallory0 (2018-04-27 02:38:10+00:00): No sidewalk, I just see neighborhood people walking right on the side of the road all the time.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58459627
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-27 02:51:50+00:00): OK, doesn't count as a footway, then.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58459627
Shmallory0 (2018-04-27 02:58:56+00:00): I'll just delete
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58459627
Lokai (2018-04-27 06:30:30+00:00): Guten Morgen,

bitte beachte die Kommentare, die an dich gerichtet werden. Hinterhoffläche ist kein Park.
bryceco (2018-05-02 22:35:11+00:00): For adult clubs please use amenity=stripclub
Constable (2018-04-27 08:31:26+00:00): ciao, benvenuto su osm! cosa volevi aggiungere con questa modifica? hai aggiunto delle aree etichettate come area=yes, manca un tag che indichi la natura di quegli oggetti.
highflyer74 (2018-04-27 07:10:30+00:00): Hallo Martin!

Bitte füge addr: Daten nicht zu Parks hinzu. Diese Daten werden nur für Dinge verwendet, denen man auch Post schicken kann. Lies' Dir bitte auch das von mir in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55246720 verlinkte Tutorial durch, bevor Du weitermappst. Danke!
kartonage (2018-04-27 16:48:35+00:00): Hallo Martin Berlin, wir denken uns auch keine Namen für Parks aus oder zeichnen Parks über schon vorhandene Parks. Ich kann hier und da ein paar realistische Änderungen sehen, generell erschleicht mich aber der Verdacht, dass deine Intention Objekte hinzuzufügen/zu ändern eine andere ist. Es war zB richtig in der Brunnenstr 184 den Parkplatz zu vergrößern. Der Park und die Weideflächen aber natürlich nicht. Auch die Namen für die Parks sind so nicht richtig.
//
Ich bin durch deine letzten Changesets gegangen und habe die Fehler aufgeräumt bzw. Anpassungen vollzogen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58481990). Wäre schön, wenn du dir das von highflyer74 verlinkte Tutorial zu Herzen nehmen würdest. Danke für das Verständnis.

Schöne Grüße

@highflyer74 Danke! :)
Lokai (2018-04-27 06:13:23+00:00): Guten Morgen,

beim P Marktplatz schau noch mal drüber. Hat das Ritterdenkmal einen Namen? Das wär doch was für description=....
Chiuaua (2018-04-27 00:09:34+00:00): Omdat te weinig karakters beschikbaar waren bij omschrijving: Keuze gemaakt om N207 over de Leidsche Vaart in beide richtingen van construction af te halen. Resterende werk zal in juni/juli gereed zijn en het verkeer wordt ter plekke er zeer duidelijk langs geleid.
miluethi (2024-07-05 12:38:53+00:00): Hi Htseedon0

You are combining several single buildings and empty yard into one building.
This is not correct. Each single buildings need a single shape and whenever possible the shapes should be squared out. I'm going to revert you additions, sorry.

Thanks for contributing to OSM Nicaragua.
R0bst3r (2018-04-27 06:43:42+00:00): Hallo Floetry Blluminatus,
wilkommen bei OSM.
Danke für deinen Beitrag, leider ist er so nicht sichtbar. Damit er sichtbar wird muss ein Haupttag hinzu, z.B. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office oder https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop. 
Falls es eine offizielle Firma ist, könen auch weitere Tags ergänzt werden, wie z.B der Eigenname.
Die angegebene URL ist übrigens nicht aufrufbar, weil das https Zertifikat ungültig ist.
Zur Einführung in OSM empfehle ich den Beginners' guide auf wiki.osm.org. Dort findet man auch Anleitungen zu allen Themen.
Viel Erfolg noch!
viloan (2018-04-27 00:40:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-04-27 00:40:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2018-04-29 12:00:24+00:00): Hi,
you added many colour tags on bus_stops. Is this the colour / names of the bus lines stopping there? If so, this should be put to a "route_ref=*" tag.
Jan
freebeer (2018-08-25 18:15:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61991484 where the changeset comment is: OSM contains facts, not fictional Memorial highways.  cleanup after persistent personperson40 vandalism.  this is no longer funny, and breaks too many real-world things.
Supaplex (2019-02-08 09:45:22+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
seattlefyi (2018-04-28 16:16:22+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edits - I did undo part of your changeset -- I re-added the address for the closed Remedy Tea shop (but removed the business-related tags) in order to preserve address info, since that usually persists between shop closings. In the iD editor, you can click on "All Tags" in the panel, and delete tags one at a time. Thanks again!
viloan (2018-04-27 01:58:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
trigpoint (2018-05-16 12:11:46+00:00): Hi, the tag GB:nsl_restricted seems very odd and contradictory. 30/40/50 mph is not National Speed Limit. Is this tag  documented or dicussed anywhere?
Cheers Phil
John Grubb (2018-05-16 18:04:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Speed_limits

Lists 40/50mph as single carriageway limit when for specific vehicle classes for which those limits are default under the "derestriction/national speed limit sign" (white circle with black diagonal stripe). When posted as a signed maximum (black number on white circle with red border) for all vehicles it would logically follow that 20/40/50mph limits are classed with 30mph as "restricted," as they are "standard" legal speed restrictions below the NSL in the UK. The wiki table UK section perhaps needs some expansion in that regard after due peer discussion.
viloan (2018-04-27 02:02:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
aharvey (2019-04-23 02:30:03+00:00): Could you help clarify what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580821895 is?
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-28 01:45:44+00:00): Please don't attach areas to the centerlines of waterways and roads, this makes it much more difficult to maintain the centerlines, the area itself, and doesn't accurately reflect the area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58461822
Hernan (2018-04-29 17:02:48+00:00): Hola, queria marcarte varias correcciones que deberias hacer. SI queres marcar un building=house, debe ser solo el edificio, no todo el terreno que tiene la parcela. Si queres marcar la parcela, lo haces con place=plot. Y si queres marcar una manzana con muchas parcelas, se hace con place=city_block. Por favor en cuento tengas un momento, corregí estos elementos asi no se pierde el dato.
Saludos
Hernan
Matthew Darwin (2018-04-27 13:31:06+00:00): Did you mean to merge the addresses (106 & 110 Ontario Street) into the way and tag the way as a building?

(w583840001) has no addr:housenumber but has addr:street
(w583840003) has no addr:housenumber but has addr:street
zzptichka (2018-04-27 13:47:22+00:00): Yes, fixed it
Carto'Cité (2018-06-07 10:57:18+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu.
Merci pour ces contributions. J'ai remarqué qu'il vous arrive d'ajouter le tag cycleway=opposite sur des ways ayant déjà cycleway:left=opposite_lane, qui est bien plus détaillé. Par exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530061371, que j'ai corrigé. 
Je remarque aussi que vous utilisez l'éditeur Potlatch, qui ne gère peut-être pas ces subtilités...
Bonne continuation :-)
Antoine (Carto'Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF).
JJIglesias (2018-04-27 07:06:01+00:00): Saludos. Si el elemento esta incorrectamente ubicado, debe moverse a su posicion correcta PERO NO SE LO BORRA, para crear otro elemento en la posicion correcta. Asi NO FUNCIONA el mapa.
No es un Lego que pones y quitas.
Favor tomar en cuenta.
Gracias
mboeringa (2018-09-22 13:04:37+00:00): Hi Robert,

I noticed you added a lot forestry tracks west of Port Alberni with a road classification that seems disputable, like highway=secondary/tertiary.

This is undesirable. Even if they are build to high standard for resource extraction with heavy equipment, a track remains a track if it doesn't serve the purposes and functions as documented in the OSM wike for a highway=secondary/tertiary, that is, secondary roads and tertiary roads are supposed to connect population centres. Dead end forestry tracks, even when build to a standard that might function as a highway=secondary/tertiary in developing countries where they DO connect population centres, should still be tagged as tracks.
I am actually slightly suprised you added it like this, as I saw you confirming a more sensible tagging scheme by Jack the Ripper (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jack%20the%20Ripper/diary/41953), that does conform to the more generally accepted road classification standards in OSM and their usage, yet you haven't implemented it here.
Adding extra notes in tags like "comments" or classifying the roads as "service=resource extraction" isn't helpful. What are data consumers supposed to do? Convert all roads tagged with "service=resource extraction" to tracks? This would be really undesirable, just imagine everybody started tagging roads as highway=secondary/tertiary and adding (multiple) secondary imaginary tags just to say: "Sorry, this isn't actually a true secondary/tertiary road, I just tagged it like that for my own purposes, and now you have to deal with it"

Marco
Viajero Perdido (2018-09-22 15:13:22+00:00): It's debatable.  There's been a recent discussion on the subject here:  https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62581

In Alberta, I map most forestry roads as unclassified, with "significant" roads (longer distance, many tributaries) as tertiary, and that seems both logical and wiki-compatible.
mboeringa (2018-09-22 17:31:34+00:00): Viajero, OK, yes I see this was already discussed. 

However, while I can understand a scheme based on tertiary and unclassified, most of the roads tagged here are secondary and tertiary, even the dead end roads leading to nowhere (no buildings / caravans / huts visible in the detailed imagery available), so I do think these would need to be downgraded. Maybe its ongoing work, because I see some similar tracks as unclassified as well.

All in all, I think I lean more to Andrew_Finn's tagging suggestions in the link you provided (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=702664#p702664), where track is still a significant tag for most of these roads.

I do also wonder why especially tracktype=x tagging has not been more universally adopted by the Canadian community (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype). This baffles me. Especially in a country with so many unpaved roads and tracks that may serve functions beyond forestry access, adding tracktype to all unpaved roads/tracks would seem logical to give better information about the solidity and quality of the road from a driving perspective.
Viajero Perdido (2018-09-22 19:20:59+00:00): I rarely do tracktype myself because it can be hard to discern correctly if you're working from imagery, and it really slows down mapping.  But maybe I should try...

Sorry, off-topic for this changeset.  If there's more discussion, maybe we can move it to the forum?  Cheers.
eggie (2018-04-27 07:09:58+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
jgon6 (2018-04-27 04:56:20+00:00): Inktindy, I see you have made a few changesets here with the same comment. Would you be able to in the future use the comments to describe what you have changed? It really helps other mappers like myself know what you are doing when we map in the same areas later. For instance this changeset you moved a single node, but I can't tell why.
mueschel (2018-04-28 17:30:18+00:00): This changeset was reverted: Vandalism in form of various random tags
habi (2019-02-18 09:08:03+00:00): I don't think you should name the trees :)
habi (2019-02-18 09:09:07+00:00): And in my opinion they are more suited to be added as single node instead of circular way.
habi (2019-02-18 11:10:10+00:00): Note: Further discussed via direct messages on OSM.
jgon6 (2018-04-27 15:41:31+00:00): This edit looks good. The only thing I see that you could add would be if you know more about the clinic you added. A name would be really nice, but if you have any of the other information that ID asks for that would be helpful. Although if you don't know this or can't get this information don't worry about it too much.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58464096
muralito (2018-04-27 14:49:13+00:00): Hola. Esto podra llamarse Terminal de Omnibus pero no clasifica para ser amenity=bus_station. Se precisa cierta infraestructura y servicios para serlo. Es simplemente el fin de linea.

Saludos,
M.
user_6471069 (2018-04-27 09:45:49+00:00): Co ta nazwa name=Mistrzunio ma oznaczać?
nebulon42 (2018-05-01 21:12:24+00:00): Das ist ein besserer Änderungssatz-Kommentar als "®eboot-edv.ck Eintrag" von vorher, da er beschreibt was geändert wurde. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob du OpenStreetMap privat editierst oder ob du das als Service an Kunden anbietest. Es ist eigentlich nicht nötig in Änderungssatzkommentaren Werbung zu machen, denn das findet man schwer. Allerdings kann man den Kommentar so wie hier schon so lassen. Falls du das als Service anbietest, dann kann ich empfehlen bei deinem Benutzerprofil ein paar Angaben dazu hinzuzufügen und auch auf die Firma zu verlinken. Das hilft anderen Mappern.
popilen (2018-05-16 13:54:12+00:00): Ciao Giovanni, è mia opinione che il tuo inserimento dell'affresco "Ascensione della Vergine" contiene due imprecisioni, le seguenti:
- La vergine viene "Assunta" , non "Ascende"
- il tag "note" si applica per richiamare l'attenzione di altri mappatori su alcuni aspetti dell'inserimento, tipo la collocazione o altro
- la descrizione di particolari aspetti dell'inserimento, che possono risultare interessanti e utili ai fruitori della mappa, è più appropriato inserirla con il tag "description"
Con rispetto e simpatia, come si conviene da pignolo a pignolo ;-)
mueschel (2018-04-28 17:07:15+00:00): Hi,
could you explain this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5242272044

Is it a governments office, or something about fish?
Nakaner (2018-04-27 07:48:57+00:00): Hallo w3zzl3,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Leider hatten Deine Bearbeitungen genau das Muster von Leuten, die versuchen, Pokémons anzulocken. Das ist bei uns unerwünscht.

Bitte trage nur Dinge ein, die der Realität entsprechen! Ich habe daher den unglaubwürdigen Zebrastreifen gelöscht und deinen Phantasie-Park mit dem Namen Spielplatz als Spielplatz ohne Namen erfasst. Bitte lies dir https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tipps-fuer-neue-pokemon-go-mapper/?lang=de und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben

Viele Grüße

Michael
w3zzl3 (2018-04-27 10:34:51+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für Tipps und ich entschuldige mich für die Unannehmlichkeiten, die ich mit meinen Anfängerfehlern gemacht habe! 
Ich lese mir die Tipps durch bevor ich mich an weitere Änderungen versuche!
Viele Grüße
w3zzl3
user_5359 (2018-04-27 19:18:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Baloo Uriza (2018-04-28 01:50:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58493259 where the changeset comment is: Spam removal.
user_5359 (2018-04-27 19:17:20+00:00): Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
nevw (2018-04-27 07:44:23+00:00): This also appears to be a normal housing residence instead of 'Jolt-eon Park'
Should it be deleted?
nevw (2018-04-30 22:53:42+00:00): no response, deleted 'Jolt-eon Park'
Irma IRM-ED (2021-06-09 00:04:57+00:00): Hi shazma esmail,
Thanks for your building digitizing.
Sorry, maybe the current condition of some buildings is no longer relevant because in the past 3 years a lot has changed in the area based on the most updated imagery.
Please check https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/583872850
Thanks again :).