piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-11-10 21:13:40+00:00): Joop, Je toevoerweg naar het huis zat op een aantal plaatsen geplak aan de landuse grass en forest.  Commodoortje heeft dat losgemaakt. het is zaak goed in te zoomen en niet te plakken. Editor iD wordt geleverd met ingebouwde lijm lijkt het wel. Hier zie je je eigen edit nog met het plakwerk. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53668761
eggie (2017-11-10 21:14:15+00:00): Bij mij doet de t het niet goed ..geplakt dus...
Commodoortje (2017-11-11 05:24:11+00:00): Bedoel je dit stukje?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53682901
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:50:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:29:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
jpennycook (2017-11-12 19:48:03+00:00): Hello Raygungoth.

In this changeset, you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539663087/history as highway=steps.  I have cycled many times from Brewery Road to the bridge over the canal, and did not have to dismount for steps.  Could you double-check that this isn't a nearby way separate to the step-free cycle access?

Jon
RaygunGoth (2017-11-13 09:10:54+00:00): Thanks for highlighting this - it turns out I forgot to account for/mistook the cycle path on the canal path! There is a separate pair of step-free/cycle-friendly paths either side of that set of steps, serving the ground level and the WWF building entrance. I've cleared that up.
jpennycook (2017-11-13 09:55:21+00:00): Thanks.  For some reason, it's usually dark when I go this way, and I'm in a hurry to get to the station, so I've usually been unaware of the footway and steps.
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540149731 the cyclepath?  If so, I'll mark it up like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157777579
Incidentally, thanks for changing highway=footway to highway=path as well - it makes more sense that way.

Jon
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
lakedistrict (2017-11-10 15:31:19+00:00): Thanks for all your edits around Newcastle, particularly the cycling infrastructure ones. In this edit it looks like you've missed the building=yes tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539663566 ? :-)
lakedistrict (2017-11-10 15:32:50+00:00): Sorry, ignore me - I hadn't spotted it was part of a relation. Keep up the good work!
jimstn (2017-11-13 11:21:43+00:00): Thanks! I also hadn't spotted that it was part of a multipolygon/relation! Not sure why it has been created like that in the first place. It might be a job for the future to tidy that up.
user_5359 (2017-11-11 12:41:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the existing area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517730382?
mavl (2018-12-25 19:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
tux67 (2017-11-10 15:22:58+00:00): Hallo Heiko,

willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mthelfen möctest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Eine Anmerkung zu deinen ersten Änderungssätzen:
So wie es aussieht, hast du das Gebäude von Mode Böschkens gelöscht und einen Parkplatz eingezeichnet.
Wenn da nichts abgerissen wurde, dann ist beim editieren was schief gelaufen und ich würde deine Änderungssätze zurücksetzen, wenn du keine anderen Informationen hast.

Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Gruß
Stephan (tux67)
tux67 (2017-11-10 17:38:38+00:00): Hallo nochmal,

Ich schau mir das morgen mal an, stellte das Gebäude wieder her und übernehme die von dir gepflegten Unternehmensdaten.

Also erst mal bitte nix mehr machen .. ;-)

Danke und Gruß Stephan
JJIglesias (2017-11-11 00:15:17+00:00): Todas las cosas en Bolivia tienen un nombre en Espanol; no son diferentes el name=xxx con el name:es=xxx pues no tenemos Dos idiomas, aparte de los originarios. Creo q para los casos que estas poniendo doble nombres aplicaria mas a brand=xxx osea Marca; como el caso de las Farmacias Gloria que seria su nombre y el Brand=Mifarma no como nombre en Espaniol.
Gracias
5m4u9 (2017-11-11 06:33:55+00:00): esto de name:es o name:en o name:xx es de mapsme, es para prevenir transliteración o traducciones erróneas.
///
hay turistas que ven un lugar y corrigen "según su idioma" pero el nombre correcto es en el idioma local... entonces hay conflicto entre locales y turistas...
///
en bolivia, podría ocurrir con nombres del quechua, aymara, guaraní locales que son corregidos al español por citadinos que desconocen
///
de vez en cuando voy limpiando name:es en bolivia, no es mucho
mavl (2018-12-25 21:17:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-10 19:35:35+00:00): Hi MattKaza,
You have merged 12 stops that have different refs, and you seperated the refs with a ";", so now we have 6 stops with two refs each. I am not sure this is correct tagging, and it's also absolutely confusing for the bus import bot. Could you unsplit these stops back into separate nodes?
.
Node list:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803052555
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803053894
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803068858
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803033079
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803033031
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803053215
MattKaza (2017-11-11 12:57:51+00:00): On one hand I do agree with what you're saying, but on the other hand this change was made because the merged bus stations are duplicates/ancient remains and infact they do not exist, and some bus databases allocate some lines to one stop and some lines to another, causing confusion and sending people to non-existant bus stations, such as the ones I merged with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803068858 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803053215 which are randomally placed along highways and I've already seen people walking down the highway to get there and catch their bus, so that is why I am not keen on re-splitting them.
However I am not too familiar with the works of the bus import bot, so if you could give me a hand here and see what other things can be done to successfully merge the station without causing bot bugs, that would be great
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-11 13:36:18+00:00): Hi Matt, the bot is very tolerant of most edits in general, but it cannot cope with refs that have ";".
.
I think there's only a single database that all apps draw from: the MOT gtfs.
.
I would suggest the following:
- Do not keep refs that do not exist. If a stop does not exist, completely remove it.
- If two stops exist and are really close to one another, make two close nodes, not a single merged node.
.
The bot would then properly understand your intentions and would mark the proper stops here: http://www.safwat.xyz/stops/.
.
I would then contact MOT and telling them about the error, hopefully they'll then fix it in the GTFS files and it'd be fixed for everyone.
.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-11 13:41:02+00:00): In other words: simply map what's on the ground exactly, without any ref hacks, and the bot will know how that is different from the GTFS, and we will report the differences. If something is not there, don't map it / delete it. If something is there, map it.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-12 19:46:15+00:00): I reverted all your stop changes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53722151
.
Please delete the bad stops when you have the time. This revert should make it easier for both of us, because it decouples the tags, allowing easier deletions on your side and allowing the bot to run on my side.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-12 19:49:56+00:00): It may be easier for you to see the stops here: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/53722151 (You can then click a stop, click "osm" on the right, and then edit or delete it).
mavl (2018-12-25 19:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Vladimír Domes (2017-11-25 19:47:02+00:00): Dobrý den, dát lanes=3 v Radvanicích na Těšínské v úseku od křižovatky s Havláskovou po křižovatku s Dalimilovou je špatně. 3 jsou jen na krátkých úsecích u odboček k Benzině a k Hrušce. Navíc, bez forward/backward je to úplně špatně.
Opravíte to?
kulich (2017-11-26 07:20:04+00:00): Děkuji za upozornění opraveno.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:38:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:55:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
M!dgard (2018-01-26 21:11:21+00:00): Bollards moeten steeds op de weg vastgemaakt zijn
M!dgard (2018-01-26 21:12:00+00:00): Bij deze is dat niet het geval: https://osm.org/node/5221743807
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-01-26 23:21:06+00:00): Hmm, dat is zo'n raar geval dat net naast het fietspad staat; vandaar dat die er ook naast staat ingetekend. Aan de sashuisbrug zijn er zo ook twee, die eigenlijk naast het fietspad staan en dus ook zo zijn ingetekend.
M!dgard (2018-01-27 01:00:46+00:00): Euh, oké dan. Wat houdt dat ding dan precies tegen?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-01-27 01:27:48+00:00): _niets_

Het staat daar gewoon.

Ik voeg trouwens graag paaltjes e.d. toe, zodat op een dag mijn GPS mij zal vertellen 'opgelet: paaltje' als ik daar fiets. En dan is het idd belangrijk dat ze _op_ een higway staan. Maar in dit geval...
zors1843 (2018-01-27 08:19:43+00:00): Zijn dat die groene paaltjes die het fietspad afbakenen ?
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ducVmOxIK66wPggGCfQTEQ
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-01-27 12:05:49+00:00): Klopt
M!dgard (2018-01-28 10:20:50+00:00): Je kan ze dan eventueel wel als way intekenen: een rij van paaltjes.
M!dgard (2018-01-28 10:23:19+00:00): Een way met daarop barrier=bollard dus. JOSM herkent dat en toont allemaal bolletjes, en de wiki zegt ook dat barrier=bollard toegelaten is op unclosed ways.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:26:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:50:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:13:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:36:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:50:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:36:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:15:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:10:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:24:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
kartler175 (2019-09-16 09:42:05+00:00): Bitte redunante Adressen bereinigen: https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/#18/51.90380/10.51996/osm-dupes
Jdes Adresse existiert nur einmal Weltweit!
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-03-29 08:01:15+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139517105/history are (a) tram tracks (b) currently used?
Meijinaerum (2018-03-29 18:37:43+00:00): Sorry, wrong filter for editing was used (only "railway=disused"). Should be reverted
Gh0stz0x (2017-11-10 19:40:12+00:00): Perché hai cancellato il sentiero?
zstadler (2017-11-14 06:55:01+00:00): Hi MattKaza and welcome to OSM!
Please note that the way to tag a pedestrian area is with "highway=pedestrian" and "area=yes". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
I have corrected 
I've corrected the areas in HaKfar HaYarok.
aharvey (2017-11-13 07:25:02+00:00): Ideally v1 of would be a building:part since it has more levels than the other part that v2 covers.
zstadler (2017-11-14 06:38:16+00:00): Hi MattKazza and welcome to OSM!
In this edit, you have created self-intersection in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100405978
Use a multipolygon in order to create an area with a "hole". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Please let me know if you prefer me to fix it.
zstadler (2021-07-11 21:30:37+00:00): The issue was resolved
Vinber (2017-11-11 16:56:03+00:00): Hello,
the convention in OpenStreetMap is to use in name the official language version, here the French. You may regret that this is not Basque, but I do not think it is the place to claim that.
Perhaps it is more appropriate to make a map with the names in Basque using the tag "name: eu=*" such as the one that exists in Breton: http://kartenn.openstreetmap.bzh/#map=8/-2.3/48.1.
So could you stop the regular renaming: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/izpura/history#

Yours sincerely,
tux67 (2017-12-04 14:03:20+00:00): Hi  jan_olieslagers,
removing the aeroway=aerodrome from the surrounding shape (which was added by the previous user) might or might not be the right step, but now you left over a shape that has just a name and no landuse or similar relevant information - which is for sure not the intention.
I would suggest to either add the airport information from the POI in the middle to the shape, or add a landuse or similar tag to the airport area.

BR
Stephan (tux67)
jan_olieslagers (2017-12-04 18:36:57+00:00): Hallo Stephan,
Thanks for constructive and polite discussion! Yes, moving all data from the NODE to the WAY would be one possible approach. I have however little trust in this WAY as it is now - have you seen it cuts straight across the apron?
On a more general note, I much regret that OSM leaves room for this kind of ambiguity - IMHO it should never be possible to map an aerodrome both as a way and as a node.
All that said, I will leave things as they are for the time being. Feel free to do your own thing! As long as each aerodrome is one and exactly one time in the database, I am a happy mapper :)
Kindly from Haacht, BE,
Karel ADAMS
tux67 (2017-12-04 19:24:52+00:00): Hi Karel,
thanks for the quick response. For now I followed the approach to used the existing way, but I added a fixme tag to the element - will ask one of the guys who created it to have another look, whether it can be optimized.

BR to Belgium
Stephan
tux67 (2017-12-04 19:25:26+00:00): Forgot to mention ...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54339824
WillGreeneCALU (2017-11-10 17:28:02+00:00): #CalUGIS #Buildings
maxerickson (2017-11-11 16:05:28+00:00): Hi-

The "name" field is for the real world name of the object. So most of the time when mapping buildings from imagery it will be left blank.

If someone instructed you to add names, could you point them at this comment and ask them to contact me?

Thanks,

Max
Martin Borsje (2017-11-11 17:24:18+00:00): Goede edit; alleen wat bedoel je met comment '#terblijt' (Ik weet dat het in Terblijt is)?
Als comment kun je beter zeggen wat je gedaan hebt, bijvoorbeeld café/naam toegevoegd.

Succes
Martin
tingr (2017-11-15 20:15:07+00:00): Hoi Martin, 
ja inderdaad geen handige comment :) 
Het was mijn eerste edit (afgezien van die voor het Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team), en ik dacht dat ik daar een hashtag moest ingeven. Ik merkte al snel dat het verkeerd was, maar het lukte niet meer om het  te verbeteren.
Bedankt voor de feedback.
user_5359 (2017-11-11 12:19:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I don’t believe the amenity=bank. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dfinancial as better description.

Please keep in contact with the mapper "Payday Loans Missuory“ "https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Payday%20Loans%20Missuory/history"
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:09:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:09:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
AlamoZ (2017-11-10 17:51:36+00:00): I'm not sure why a large orange square is showing over the area I changed but hopefully the actual change I submitted will show up. I could not find the "P" symbol denoting a parking area. The rear half of that building is a public parking structure that uses all floors.
user_5359 (2017-11-11 12:15:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The need tags are amenity=parking and parking=multi-storey. I don't use the editor iD, so I can't help you finding the tags.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-15 08:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53794087.
AriaGeoFan (2018-02-20 12:21:05+00:00): سلام
ییخشید میخواستم بپرسم شما خودتون توی این معدن مس درآلو کارمیکنین که اینقدر دقیق رسم کردین؟ حتی توی تصاویر گوگل این جزئیاتی که کشیدین دیده نمیشه، مثل اون نقاله و ...
دوما میخواستم ببینم این مستطیلهایی که کشیدیدن با تگ
landuse=industrial
چی هستند؟ چون معنی خاصی ندارن
AriaGeoFan (2018-02-20 12:22:48+00:00): همچنین این تیرهای برق و کابلهای برق اصلا دیده نمیشند اما شما همه تیرهای برق رو رسم کردین