piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vvv222 (2022-09-09 08:48:44+00:00): Bonjour Benoît,
Je ne comprends pas. Ici il y est question de la surface du boulevard Arago "AddPathSurface" et non d'éclairage.
Benoît C MdP (2022-09-09 08:52:27+00:00): Ah oui pardon, c'est une modification précédente par Christophe Raverdy : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/874404604/history
trial (2026-07-07 10:10:41+00:00): Bonjour concerant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10009352210 : très bien, mais je vois que des chemins à côté sont nommés de même. Or ils ne figurent pas au cadastre (pas de nom, juste leur emprise). Un peu de nettoyage à faire ?
Je vous aussi un Noalejou au nord : un doublon qui mériterait un alt_name du premier ?
trial (2026-07-07 10:13:19+00:00): Quant à Coat Ty Bescound à côté : le moulin à côté reprend son nom entre parenthèses :-( et avec une graphie différente.
Piskvor (2022-09-12 08:14:01+00:00): Ok, thanks for removing the extra tags. I have added back the house number, as that still exists.
Igor Bubelov (2022-09-13 06:12:54+00:00): Sorry, my bad. I thought it's a business so I concluded that it's closed. Still learning how tagging works, I'll be careful next time
Piskvor (2022-09-29 11:15:26+00:00): Thanks for the update. Your assumption was correct, the house number should be a different node; however when this was mapped ages ago, someone put them together.

Edit boldly - this is nothing to worry about :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
mavl (2022-09-14 03:34:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126158907 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125948947].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
marc__marc (2023-04-22 18:13:16+00:00): Hello,
thanks for the improvement.
take the time to upload changeset before traveling :) it help having managable changeset
Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-21 21:03:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10009454217/history has operator = n/a that was added in this edit
operator=n/a ? is it an attempt to tag that operator is not applicable or unknown or missing?

Either way, operator=n/a is wrong unless operator is actually named "n/a"
chnuessli (2025-07-23 11:12:44+00:00): Thank you, i have deleted the tag since it's useless.
SafetyIng (2022-09-12 10:01:15+00:00): Ist das eine eigene geweihte Kirche?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125949941
SafetyIng (2022-09-12 10:01:44+00:00): Ist das eine eigene geweihte Kirche?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125949941
Niiepce (2022-09-18 17:58:09+00:00): Achte auf die korrekte Verwendung von name=*
Niiiepce (2022-10-09 17:27:17+00:00): Erledigt
trial (2025-08-10 12:25:28+00:00): non "Plage de Pen-hat" n'est pas un hameau, c'est... une plage.
Falsernet (2022-09-08 16:21:03+00:00): ^^Plus turning lanes, signal positions
DaveF (2022-09-08 21:46:51+00:00): Hi
If the gate is on a PROW, how can access be private?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10009460327
starsep (2022-09-08 16:32:07+00:00): Polecam dane z https://github.com/openstreetmap-polska/Warszawskie_dane_rowerowe
+ Wtyczka OpenData do JOSMa
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-08 19:51:02+00:00): Dziękuję za wskazanie wtyczki! Poprawiłem zgodnie z danymi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125956134
SekeRob (2022-09-09 08:06:08+00:00): For your awareness "warnings:impossible_oneway:highway"
multimob (2023-04-14 09:01:09+00:00): This changeset is faulty.

This bus stop is run by De Lijn and you changed some tags inherited from TEC, which is another company operating here, creating a mess, for instance assigning zone numbers from one operator to the other, or creating a mismatch between network and network:wikidata.

Belgium is a complicated country, that is why local mappers spend a lot of time carefully maintaining proper tags, especially like hear near internal borders where many stops are shared by two or more operators.  We are quite saddened to see people without any local knowledge adding wrong data.
VLD528 (2023-04-17 10:58:37+00:00): Multimob, you are totally right. I have to check places all around the world into French, I'm not from Belgium (and I did never be there neither). I'm from France (and not near Belgium neither).
I'm trying to use the better tools to check all amendments done. But sometimes, my ignorance of the local uses is an issue. Thank you for your note. I will try to better check the position of each bus-stop in the future.
multimob (2023-04-17 11:30:08+00:00): OK, thanks, you’re welcome.
Have a nice day!
SekeRob (2022-09-09 08:14:49+00:00): geography > geometry ;o)
mavl (2022-09-14 03:34:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126158907 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125948947].
q_un_go (2022-09-08 17:02:23+00:00): Problem:
Die Linien fahren nun alle auf der Ostseite ab. Das bedeutet man fährt den Bahnhof nun umgekehrt an als früher, also von Süden ein und nach Norden hinaus.
Das bedeutet, dass nun sämtliche Buslinien am Bahnhof falsch sind und gedreht werden müssen. Sisyphos lässt grüßen. Mit PTV2 ist das extrem mühselig und fehleranfällig. Aber die Wirklichkeit ist, wie sie ist... :-(
skyper (2023-01-07 14:08:27+00:00): So kompliziert ist das auch wieder nicht. Ja es braucht etwas Übung und Zeit aber sobald das System erkannt ist, sind es auch nur ein paar Klicks pro Relation.

Wie lange soll der Umbau des Bahnhofs denn dauern und werden die Fahrtrichtungen dann wieder umgedreht?

Grüße skyper
q_un_go (2023-01-19 17:26:51+00:00): Das mit dem Bahnhof Müllheim dauert mindestens bis 2024.
Es sind doch ziemlich viele Linienvarianten da...  (ich hab die bei uns alle im Planungssystem) und ich finde es da schon ziemlich ätzend, die einzuarbeiten. Gefühlt sind es bei die 261 12 Fahrten mit 15 Linienvarianten und 30 Fahrzeitprofilen. (also tatsächlich hat Mo-Fr fast jede Fahrt eine eigene Linienvariante und auch die Fahrzeitprofile (die wir in OSM glücklicherweise nicht abbilden) sind unterschiedlich. Die 261 ist sehr aufwändig zu pflegen, ganz im Gegensatz etwa zur 309.
q_un_go (2023-01-19 17:31:12+00:00): Wie der neue ZOB in Müllheim aussehen soll, weiß ich nicht. Es wäre ja theoretisch möglich, dass man da künftig auch vom Bahnhof in die Eisenbahnstraße fahren kann, wenn die den ZOB vernünftig planen. (Aber das ist nicht gesagt. Staufen Süd, Bussteig 2, hat z.B. eine deutlich gekrümmte Bussteigkante.
Grüße
Winfried
ruugie (2022-09-09 12:19:06+00:00): The tracing quality is too bad. Please learn to straighten buildings by pressing "Q".
TheLNL (2025-10-11 06:08:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092941900
this drain is not visible in aerials, is it underground ?
or is it outdated info ?
Vonter (2025-10-17 15:21:42+00:00): Some of the drain way elements were traced approximately and may not match the exact path of water flow. It probably matches it somewhat, but since these drains tend to be seasonal, they may not always be visible in aerial imagery.
TheLNL (2025-10-19 12:52:32+00:00): As there are no lines of erosion or any physical indication of there having been a drain there, should the way be deleted ?
Vonter (2025-10-24 16:00:11+00:00): If there is absolutely no physical trace of a drain in the area, then deleting it would be the right way to go. I believe in this case it is more likely that there is a minor seasonal drain, but it may not be easily evident from aerial imagery. I've retraced the way based on what I think seems to be a possible path, in the aerial imagery, that the drain follows: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092941900
RVR015 (2022-09-16 22:04:17+00:00): Hi Dourven, 

Based on the BDOrtho IGN this is not an islet. Can you explain the tagging of this feature? Thank you so much!
dourven (2022-09-17 06:45:23+00:00): Bonjour RVR015
Le Château est un ilot  constitué au nord dune façade rocheuse au sud d'une petite plaine herbacée  donnant sur  une plage de sable .
à l'est il existe les vestiges d'une carrière de schiste .
ce sont les éléments cadrant avec une description d' ilot (islet).
ejfVvTkzQ3pf_AH*RD-@*og6 (2022-09-08 17:09:52+00:00): I'm a bit confused as to why the entire address doesn't show up, despite having an address node.

I checked the other restaurant and I don't seem to be missing any fields. Is it simply so that it's something with the address rather than the info I added (since the whole address doesn't render)?
eggie (2022-09-08 17:30:12+00:00): Precies.. zodra je een amenity of shop e.d. toevoegd krijgt het icoontje voorrang.
De mapnik is een van de weinige kaarten die adressen laat zien. De meeste kaarten tonen ze niet 
Zoeken op adres is wel mogelijk.
Groet..
Eggie
ejfVvTkzQ3pf_AH*RD-@*og6 (2022-09-08 17:35:31+00:00): Oké. Dus de toevoeging klopt wel? Ik kreeg namelijk geen icoontje, zelfs niet na verwijderen cache & crtl+F5. Vandaar dat ik niet zeker was.
eggie (2022-09-08 17:48:44+00:00): Nu wel...   Even de tijd geven.
mrdvt92 (2022-09-12 18:19:24+00:00): Way: 1092943091 appears to be incorrect.
Joseph R P (2022-09-12 19:57:30+00:00): How so?
Glassman (2024-11-14 19:23:11+00:00): DWG here - you added this trail 2 years ago. We have received a complaint from the landowner that this is on private land and the trail doesn't exist. Plus the area is unsafe to hike. Can you confirm this trail exists? Thanks
trailSeeker9000 (2024-11-14 20:53:13+00:00): I am not near that place anymore, can not check unfortunately.
Glassman (2024-11-14 22:48:05+00:00): Thanks - I'll look for other sources.
gebux (2024-11-18 11:53:16+00:00): I'm not a local but according to the strava-heatmap the path sees frequent use.

https://nakarte.me/#m=17/47.81297/13.09468&l=O/Sr
user_18305684 (2023-07-16 17:38:18+00:00): Hi,

You added name to some roads. But, on 4 roads, you added the tag natural instead of name, I fixed it, I mean I tried to fix it, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138588218.
Because i'm not sure of the names because there are 2 different roads with the same name = https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092943458 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381762926 + the 4 I changed.

Could you have a look and improve the names if necessary ?

Best regards
Langlaeufer (2022-09-08 19:55:45+00:00): Bist du dir sicher? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface%3Dconcrete:plates

oder doch paving_stones
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125951908
literan (2022-09-08 20:36:00+00:00): а зачем name:ru удалили? верну
user_5359 (2022-09-08 19:30:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t delete private ways, if the exists. You can mark them with access=private (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) .
felipeeugenio (2022-09-08 20:47:57+00:00): Estimado, por favor dejar este tipo de ediciones. los centros son mapeables, pero no son atractivos turisticos. los está agregando con lo primero que hay en la lista
bc1829 (2022-09-08 17:56:50+00:00): Changes:
- Replace pedestrian area with footpaths
- Update fence to reflect reality (including gaps for entrances)
DaveF (2022-09-08 20:23:35+00:00): Please don't remove valid data to 'map incorrectly to suit the router'
There's an irony in you splitting a fence to indicate the full width of a pedestrian entrance yet deleting that pedestrian area indicate the width.
AgusQui (2022-09-18 03:59:01+00:00): Buenisimo aporte! Te mejoré la relación, fijate que las paradas highway=bus_stop deben ir en su posicion tal cual la realidad, o sea sobre la vereda. Vi que agregaste mas paradas que todavía no relacionaste, no lo hice porque no estoy seguro que pertenezcan a esta línea. Cualquier duda avisame, o podes entrar al grupo Telegram de la comunidad. Saludos!
Belle Haven Mapper (2022-09-16 01:56:06+00:00): This change appears to have erroneously changed the position of quite a number of nodes (evidenced by looking at the trails in the Mount Vernon District Park, the ways are unmodified, but the nodes for a number of trails have been weirdly squared, see node 7500054677 for an example).

Could you take a look it? The address data is quite a good addition, it'd be nice if it would be possible to just revert the problem with locations.
whammo (2022-09-16 05:46:48+00:00): Hey BHM, thanks for catching, and shame on me for not seeing this. It looks like I accidentally orthogonalized the trail. I've reverted the trail shape, which you can see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801839380
Belle Haven Mapper (2022-09-23 01:14:55+00:00): Looks great, thank you!
Dodko (2022-09-10 16:49:44+00:00): Značené priechody pre chodcov
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10009737768
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10009737619
radšej značiť ako

highway=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled
crossing_ref=zebra
user_2066394 (2022-09-13 09:38:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94961396
Der Weg geht aktuell durch das Gebäude durch (Überschneidung).
aTarom (2022-09-08 19:13:00+00:00): Hi VARVAR8, it's right the 
"brownfield "="yes"?
at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092961282/history
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092961301/history
Cheers
VARVAR8 (2022-10-02 23:39:38+00:00): Hi, aTarom
thank you for comments. I made a mistake with the tag. i will fix it.
armitageone (2022-09-09 12:20:32+00:00): Это выглядит как вандализм - удалять такое количество информации с карты.
mavl (2022-09-14 03:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126158907 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125948947].
VLD549 (2022-10-04 16:04:47+00:00): Hi, could you indicate where you got the proof from, that it is called Hoeksebaan? Thank you!
Geim (2022-10-04 17:24:18+00:00): PDOK NWB wegen
https://app.pdok.nl/viewer/
-Zoom to region 
-Select dataset
-Overige kaarten
-NWB wegen 
   -wegvakken
-Click on the road
-Check "Object informatie"in the bottom right.
_Scroll down to the tag "sttNaam"

I agree that names are confusing with so many sources.
BGT, BAG, NWB-wegen etc. But if it's not clear and there are no signs then we mostly use NWB wegen.
In this case I was triggerd by a note from a local and after check I changed it accordingly.
VLD548 (2022-10-07 12:31:23+00:00): I agree with the comment of Geim. Sources are trustable. Thanks.
W3NET0wns (2022-09-09 13:54:33+00:00): Z racji, iż L. Kondratowicza będzie otwarta dopiero od jutra (10/09/22r. godz. 10) mogłeś dać ją jako wszyscy = no. Takie moje spostrzeżenie
msadow (2022-09-09 14:28:53+00:00): Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. Moje niedopatrzenie.
englu (2022-09-09 07:16:07+00:00): Czy w miejscu 49.517742, 22.192276 droga przestała istnieć czy są obecnie dwie drogi? https://www.strava.com/heatmap#17.54/22.19262/49.51766/hot/all
Wojtek Pysz (2022-09-09 07:35:51+00:00): Dróg w lesie i pod lasem jest często wiele, jedne zanikają, inne "grubieją". Z dwóch dróg zaznaczonych na OSM zostawiłem jedną, która realnie jest wyznakowany szlak niebieski. Jeśli widać dwie, to może nie odświeżyła się jeszcze pamięć podręczna.
englu (2022-09-09 08:00:01+00:00): W OSM jest jedna droga, ale na śladach ze Stravy wyraźnie widać dwie. Dzięki za informację o przebiegu szlaku.
Slawek_n (2022-09-10 12:03:53+00:00): W rzeczywistości są dwie drogi. Tą pod lasem raczej nie da się przejść, w każdym razie mniej wygodnie niż tą skasowaną.
Nadgorliwość przy kasowaniu nie jest zbyt dobra.
Proszę o wycofanie kasowania tej drogi.
Aha, nie mówię o śladach ze stravy czy zdjęciach lotniczych lecz osobistych odczuciach po przejściu tej drogi.
Wojtek Pysz (2022-09-10 12:39:49+00:00): W opisywanym miejscu byłem osobiście 5 września. Nie miałem problemu z przejściem drogą, która pozostała na mapie i którą biegnie szlak. Tą drogą z lewej strony też szedłem, a także tą trzecią, poniżej po łące. Zostawiłem jedną z nich, żeby nie zaciemniać mapy. Realny wędrowiec w realnym terenie nie będzie miał problemu, żeby (w lesie i w górach) pójść parę metrów z lewej lub z prawej w stosunku do ścieżki na mapie. Głównym moim zadaniem była korekta przebiegu niebieskiego szlaku, gdzie różnice miedzy terenem a OSM dochodziły do dwóch kilometrów (Poraż, Morochów). 
Aby nie czynić przykrości bliźniemu swemu, dorysowałem te równoległe drogi. Zresztą, można to było zrobić samemu, bez uszczypliwych uwag:-)
shigi (2022-09-11 18:04:24+00:00): Hi Sarah, is there any public information on that guest house named "Axel"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125954777
frienlydisaster (2022-09-09 09:50:16+00:00): У місцях, де тротуари позначені окремими доріжками, обирайте тег sidewalk=separate
DonRoPL (2023-04-17 09:09:20+00:00): Hey twill91,
fire_hydrant:ref ist not the correct tagging for a hydrant ref. the correct tagging is only "ref".
do you want to look at this again and correct it?
cheers
skyper (2023-04-25 16:30:31+00:00): Hallo twill91,
herzlich willkommen bei OSM. Schön, dass Du mithelfen willst die Daten zu verbessern. Zusätzlich zur Verwendung von `ref` anstelle von `fire_hydrant:ref` habe ich die Frage woher Du die Informationen zu den Hydranten hast.
Bitte gebe doch eine Quelle im Änderungssatzkommentar oder als zusätzliches Merkmal `source=` des Änderungssatze an.
Viele Grüße,
skyper
twill91 (2023-05-04 21:00:53+00:00): Hi Skyper,
die Daten haben wir durch eine Begehung und Einzeichnung in ausgedruckten Plan anhand der Hydrantenschilder aufgenommen. 
Viele Grüße
skyper (2023-05-04 22:24:27+00:00): Hi  twill91,
danke für die Antwort und sorry für die Frage, denn da habe ich ja glatt `source=survey` übersehen.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen und Grüße,
skyper
DonRoPL (2023-05-09 08:19:57+00:00): Hi twill91

can you look again for the right tagging?
DonRoPL (2023-07-12 06:41:14+00:00): Hi twil91,

no answer -> chance.
DonRoPL (2023-07-12 07:45:56+00:00): how can it be that they all have the same ref number = 97? something is wrong...
wireguy (2022-09-08 22:33:44+00:00): Hi Ian, welcome to OSM!   I know nothing about tagged a marina, but since you asked for a review...  I think that it shouldn't be marked natural=water, but leisure=marina and also include the non-water area of the marina (buildings, parking, etc).    for more info, see the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dmarina

if you have any q's, ask, or join the discord or slack.  Keep mapping NJ!
Glassman (2022-09-10 16:37:12+00:00): alley's are usually connected to roads and both ends. I'd consider this just a plain service road. Can you review this edit? I'll send more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125955447
BillyJBryant (2022-09-10 21:03:07+00:00): This alleyway is blocked off with concrete pole barricades and does not connect through on the 98th Avenue connection.
YraFyra (2022-09-08 20:04:34+00:00): Bra.
Dansbanan syns inte längre.
NPistora (2022-09-08 20:12:58+00:00): Jag tog bort taggen Highway/Footway för det stod som felkod. Kanske var fel. Fast jag tycker den syns fortfarande.
NieWnen (2022-09-14 13:00:34+00:00): Wycofałem.
NieWnen (2022-09-14 13:00:23+00:00): Wycofałem.
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-10 05:25:29+00:00): Atstačiau teisingą dviračių ir pėsčiųjų takų žumėjimą. Nereikia atskirais vektoriais skaidyti to, kas yra kartu.
lefuturiste (2022-09-08 19:56:39+00:00): source+=local knowledge
aixbrick (2022-09-09 13:22:38+00:00): Hallo,
ich nutze das mal, um etwas zu fragen. Du hast vor zwei Monaten die Wege in der Gartenkolonie von hw=service auf hw=track geändert. Warum? Das sind doch normale Zufahrtswege und keine Wirtschaftswege (sprich Feld-/Waldwege).
Gruß
Ropino (2022-09-09 17:33:25+00:00): Hi,
für mich fällt das unter 'track', weil für mich eine Kleingartenanlage als eine Sonderform von "Landwirtschaft" gesehen wird. z.B. gilt in DE für Dauerkleingartenanlagen nach BKleingG regelmäßig die (günstige) Grundsteuer 'A'.
Für 'service' fehlt mir die (gern auch mit [access] beschränkte) Nutzung mit Fahrzeugen. Auf den Wegen in den Kleingartenanlagen ist das Befahren nur extrem eingeschränkt möglich. z.B. um in Einzelfall größere/schwere Dinge vom/zum Garten zu transportieren.
Siehe: https://www.kleingarten-aachen.de/recht/Unsere_G&O.pdf : "Das Befahren der Kleingartenanlage mit Fahrzeugen aller Art ist nicht
erlaubt. In besonderen Fällen kann der Verein Ausnahmen gestatten."

'normale' Zufahrtswege sind das daher für mich nicht.
VG
aixbrick (2022-09-09 19:48:55+00:00): Kann ich nachvollziehen. Danke für die Erklärung.
MxxCon (2022-09-09 04:40:26+00:00): Hello.
Please note that name tag is a not a category or a description.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125956633
MxxCon (2022-09-09 04:39:19+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125956687
MxxCon (2022-09-09 04:37:34+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125956777
woodpeck (2022-09-25 13:21:40+00:00): What is the data source for these trail names? Looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085856037/history it appears that one and the same trail has, over the course of its OSM history, appeared as "Shaffer Trail", "Massey Draw Trail", and "High Meadows Trail". How is it possible that such ambiguity exists about the naming?
carpiediem (2022-09-25 20:55:06+00:00): Here's the source.
https://ken-carylranch.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/KCR-Open-Space-Map-2020-11-web-version.pdf

As you can see, there are places where trail segments aren't directly labeled, so you have to guess the name based on nearby segments. I updated a few names after I was able to hike up to the area and see the way finding signs.
MDA27 (2022-09-11 02:14:38+00:00): Você alterou uma linha de transmissão de energia para caminho informal?
map4e123 (2024-10-08 09:56:58+00:00): Hallo,

Sie haben die Gebühr für den Wohnmobilstellplatz auf Deutsch hinzugefügt. Bitte verwenden Sie auf Openstreetmap nur Englisch. Die richtige Syntax könnte „13.5“ mit einem check_date sein. Sie bearbeiten nicht nur eine deutsche Version der Daten. Eine Kurtaxe ist impliziert und könnte als Beschreibung hinzugefügt werden.

Übersetzt mit DeepL

Hello,

you have added the fee for the camper site in German. Please use only English on Openstreetmap. The proper syntax could be “13.5” with a check_date. You are not just editing a German version of the data. A tourist tax is implied and could be added as a description.
matheusgomesms (2022-09-10 12:23:37+00:00): Oi Denilson,

Primeiramente bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap! Faço parte da comunidade OSM Ceará, e ficamos felizes com suas edições!

Vimos várias edições suas no Aeroporto. Você trabalha no aeroporto, ou tem essas informações disponíveis em algum lugar?

Se tiver dúvida referente a alguma etiqueta, me avise!

Abraços!
Matheus