piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trial (2021-07-20 23:15:05+00:00): "copie-de-modele" et non daté, j'ai déjà vu mieux. Je n'ai pas réussi à trouver l'âge de la dernière mise à jour et je vois que https://www.jettours.com/d/europe-mediterranee/italie/rome n'a pas de proposition vol+hôtel 3* sur Rome.
Rien n'indique sur Jettours qu'ils continuent de proposer des solutions clé en mains pour les agences (pas de lien vers des agences).
Maintenant si l'agence continue à l'afficher, tu laisses effectivement. 
On voit par exemple que https://www.sejoursvoyages.com/tours-operateurs/84-voyages-jet-tours.html ne propose plus rien.
Si tu peux en passant leur demander tu vas pouvoir mettre survey ;-).
viloan (2019-10-31 13:13:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
aquarix (2019-11-05 23:22:49+00:00): Hello AlexRiabtsev,
you have placed a new node into the Atlanic Ocean. I think this was done by error. Could you please review your changeset. Thanks
Regards aquarix
AlexRiabtsev (2019-11-06 06:36:01+00:00): Hello aquarix!
Definetely an error. But I can't find it yet.
regards,
Alex
AlexRiabtsev (2019-11-06 06:40:43+00:00): done, aquarix!
mavl (2019-10-31 16:39:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет градирню и добавляет её снова. Так не нужно делать. Нужно не перерисовывать объекты, а просто редактировать существующие.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
_torsten_ (2020-01-23 14:07:29+00:00): Hallo telemaxx, du hast die Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10217195 als Radroute eingetragen. Meines Wissens ist diese Route aber nicht vor Ort ausgeschildert, sondern nur dem Fyler zu entnehmen. Gibt es vom Anbieter dieser (und der anderen) Tour(en) eine Genehmigung zum Veröffentlichen in OSM? Oder sind die Touren mittlerweile vor Ort (on th ground) beschildert?
Fragende Grüße, Torsten.
telemaxx (2020-01-25 18:21:27+00:00): Hi Torsten,
das war eine Tour, die ich von der Internetseite meiner Unterkunft hatte und selbst abgefahren habe.
"https://www.thueringer-hof.com/hotel-bad-frankenhausen/bike-and-more/touren/" Nr. 4
Ausgeschildert? Bin mir nicht sicher, glaube aber nein.
Kannst du aber gerne wieder löschen.
Grüße,
Thomas
_torsten_ (2020-01-25 20:06:17+00:00): Hallo Thomas, ich kenne diese Radrouten. Sie werden vom Kyffhäuserkreis beworben und ich bin mir sicher, dass sie Anfang Januar 2020 nicht vor Ort beschildert war. Alle anderen Rundtouren auch nicht. Nur der Unstrut-Werra-Radweg [Tour 7] ist ausgewiesen. Ich werde die Relation demnächst entfernen.
Herzliche Grüße, Torsten.
GL9061_1B🍌🍌 (2019-11-03 16:14:41+00:00): #HKU_DH2019 #HKU_DH2019_1B
jonrellim (2019-11-01 18:22:17+00:00): Even een double check. Ik zie het niet in de sources staan, maar is dit per survey bevestigd? De laatste keer dat ik er was stond er namelijk nog wel een paal.
viloan (2019-10-31 13:44:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GL9061_1B🍌🍌 (2019-11-03 16:14:34+00:00): #HKU_DH2019 #HKU_DH2019_1B
skfd (2019-10-31 14:37:50+00:00): що це и зачем? 😂
rskedgell (2019-10-31 14:33:03+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and many thanks for updating these shops.
With the former Lloyds bank, you could also use a lifecycle prefix ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix ), e.g.
amenity=bank -> disused:amenity=bank
and consider keeping the name (or moving it to old_name=*), particularly if it's an old and distinctive bank building which people might still use as a landmark.

There's nothing wrong with you edit as it stands, but you might find this useful if you're mapping shops which haven't been surveyed for a few years.
whb (2019-10-31 19:28:10+00:00): Weg gelöscht, Begründung siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76465017
Eigenschaften ggf. bitte nochmals am vorhandenen Weg eintragen.
viloan (2019-10-31 14:19:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
CaptainCrunch (2019-11-02 21:48:35+00:00): also wenn, dann richtig: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76538658
canfe (2019-11-04 07:24:11+00:00): a) I nomi non vanno messi tra virgolette.
b) Non capisco come mai continui a mappare con edifici non ortogonali. Come ti ho scritto mappa con le Clarity, poi verifica con le maxar che son più recenti ed infine ortogonalizza. (ci sono parecchi tuoi edit ancora da sistemare in questo modo)
Gh0stz0x (2019-11-04 16:17:56+00:00): E poi i nomi vanno scritti per esteso...
pangoSE (2019-11-01 19:29:48+00:00): Hi.
Please stop this edit war at once. I urge you to discuss using words instead of resorting to reverting reverts. 
Please see my comment here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76302776
canfe (2019-11-04 07:27:21+00:00): 1) l'edificio non è così storto.
2) non va messo polizia municipale è già nel tag. Sennò mapperemmo "panchina" tutte le panchine...
canfe (2019-11-04 07:32:08+00:00): a) non può essere così storto
b) potresti mettici sito web ed altre informazioni volendo
Gh0stz0x (2019-11-04 16:18:41+00:00): Effettivamente ortogonalizzare gli edifici non sarebbe male...
trial (2024-05-25 14:08:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4501925869/history
On pêche en sous-sol à la Réunion ?
Si c'est pour dire que c'est sous abri, covered serait sans doute plus adapté.
archie (2019-10-31 16:39:35+00:00): Your comment is about the park, not about changing highway=path to highway=cycleway. Why did you retag correct edited highways?
marczoutendijk (2019-10-31 18:33:40+00:00): And I like to add this:
What kind of traffic_sign is there on that path, if any? Luckily we have mapillary:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=56.89246122622751&lng=12.50353711564344&z=17&pKey=I8EzUEUQcaW9B7qHs5zj_A&focus=photo
In the wiki this is documented:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
Hence this is NOT a cycleway but a PATH where both cyclist and pedestrian have equal rights.
Hence your retagging is wrong. Please change it back to what it was.
marczoutendijk (2019-11-01 14:06:34+00:00): You could improve tagging by adding the code for the traffic_sign to the relevant highway.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
I think it should be:
traffic_sign=SE:D7
according to:
https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/sv/vagtrafik/Vagmarken/Pabudsmarken/
user_5359 (2019-10-31 17:35:28+00:00): Hello! Short question? Why did you delete the highway=service from this area?
pangoSE (2019-11-01 18:40:21+00:00): Thanks for extending this. On maxar there are paths in the area which are missing. Could you add those as well? Also please split the reservoirs in two as they are clearly not joined (besides maybe by a culvert)
dval (2019-11-03 14:58:49+00:00): Здесь вы рисуете лес, и таких участков, где однотипные области пересекаются, множество. Об этом сообщает валидатор JOSM. Желательно их объединять, так думаю.
dval (2019-11-03 15:02:52+00:00): И вот эти кружочки часто никакого отношения к реальности не имеют. Зачем они? Для статистики?
Алексей (2019-11-03 17:15:19+00:00): И вот эти кружочки часто никакого отношения к реальности не имеют.
Соглашусь. Это природа. Деревья падают или их рубят! На аэроснимках они присутствуют.

Для статистики?
Не понимаю о какой статистике Вы говорите!

Зачем они?
Помогают в ориентировании! Идея отмечать таким образом отдельно стоящие деревья или кусты родилась несколько лет назад из жизненного опыта (занимаюсь охотой). Приведу один пример. По такому ориентиру можно приблизительно измерить расстояние (если дальномер успешно забыт дома) и сделать точный выстрел.
Алексей (2019-11-03 17:27:01+00:00): Здесь вы рисуете лес, и таких участков, где однотипные области пересекаются, множество. Об этом сообщает валидатор JOSM. Желательно их объединять, так думаю.

Вы совершенно правы! Так и делаю. Но есть и косяки. Нахожу если, то исправляю. Вам провести такую правку тоже не возбраняется.

И вот эти кружочки часто никакого отношения к реальности не имеют.
  Можете такие кружочки удалять, но только если Вы ТОЧНО УВЕРЕНЫ, что их в природе не существует!!!!
dval (2019-11-03 18:15:55+00:00): Извините! Не всегда хватает ума, чтобы не написать какую-нибудь глупость. Просто вспомнил вот это http://stat.latlon.org/ru/sverdl/latest/users.html :) . Думаю, что отдельные деревья можно указывать не кругами, а через natural=tree и уточняющими тегами в дополнение.
Алексей (2019-11-03 20:08:59+00:00): Первый раз вижу эту статистику. Мне она не интересна. Почему кругами? Все просто. Знаю только одно приложение которое отображает natural=tree. Остальные эти объекты опускают, а люди пользуются разными приложениями. Зачем их лишать возможности лицезреть такие объекты на своих навигаторах. Данный способ ошибкой не считаю.
dval (2019-11-04 04:36:39+00:00): Согласен, не ошибка, но некоторого вида неаккуратность. Вижу, Вы решили поправить контуры. Пометил некоторые пакеты как good в OSMCha. И пожелание:более подробно писать объяснения к правкам, как то рекомедует ОСМВики? Сейчас Вы их вообще не пишете :) : "(no comment)" вверху.
Алексей (2019-11-04 06:43:56+00:00): Неаккуратность? Возможно. На вкус и цвет... Мне нравится. И другим тоже. Моё произведение несет больше информации чем сплошной зеленый полигон на несколько тысяч гектар. И на экране навигатора смотрится приятней.
Объяснения не пишу потому, что не вижу в них смысла. Нечего там объяснять.
pangoSE (2019-11-01 18:34:06+00:00): Have you verified this on site?
archie (2019-10-31 16:24:33+00:00): Aren't cyclists allowed to cross here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/740748987)? Then tagging is ok. Otherwise routing will not work for bicycle. As far as I know this tagging is for crossing of opposite sidewalks; not for cycleways.
marcsa__ (2019-11-01 09:07:03+00:00): You could use barrier=tank_trap instead ? I'm not sure how standard it is but here is the wiki page anyway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dtank_trap

Swiss toblerones are specifically mentionned in the article
MFlamm (2019-11-01 09:18:25+00:00): Thanks for your hint. I had seen that tag and tested it, but it is not rendered... Do you think it is problematic to use single block nodes instead?
marcsa__ (2019-11-01 16:49:10+00:00): Hello, no problem !
IMHO rendering is besides the point in mapping -  Mapping is supposed to give info about what is really there, and if a more precise description fits for a certain item, I'd add it as this precise item. Additionally, according to the wiki, it should render in the default tile layer if added as a way.
MFlamm (2019-11-01 17:15:28+00:00): I checked the rendering when mapped as a way and, you are right, it is rendered as shown in the wiki... and is therefore almost invisible for a map reader (in particular for tourists that are interested in seeing where the blocks are actually located along the "Sentier des Toblerones". Maybe the rendering style should be changed, ideally as a line with blocks on it!?
In addition, mapping the single blocks on that portion was more of a test to check the amount of work, and in fact the effort is not reasonable ;-)
pangoSE (2019-11-01 18:32:14+00:00): This edit looks good, thanks!
viloan (2019-10-31 15:36:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mapper999 (2019-11-01 11:09:06+00:00): Auch hier sind diverse Straßenbahnhaltestellen verschwunden :(
mueschel (2019-11-01 08:39:19+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I noticed 100 nodes with some strange tags in your edits, e.g.
name=pro105
proyecto=PMDOT

Please use the 'name' tag only for the actual name of the object.
The tag 'proyecto' is not used in other places.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please have a look to the OSM Wiki to find out which tags are in use.


Cheers
Jan
dirtyidol (2019-11-01 15:52:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Also, what was the reason for deletion of highway=primary? Please, undo that deletion, if it was unintentional. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531388176
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76457486
mueschel (2019-11-02 11:06:09+00:00): I reverted this changeset because of the issues mentioned above: several deleted roads, nodes with landuse=residential inside buildings...
user_5359 (2019-10-31 17:36:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Don't use landuse.
user_5359 (2019-10-31 17:48:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
E de Wit (2019-10-31 19:31:10+00:00): Top! :)
schoka (2020-04-19 12:51:37+00:00): Hallo opendcc,
schau dir bitte die Mauer um den Friedhof an, die ist als Parkplatz getaggt. Da passt was nicht, oder?
Gruß
schoka
opendcc (2020-04-19 16:15:25+00:00): Fehler - habs korrigiert. Danke.
Jrachi (2020-11-28 14:55:45+00:00): Ciao.
Hai inserito la relazione come survey:CAI
Però non hai inserito il ref:REI e non trovo riferimento sul catasto.
Mi puoi dare spiegazioni?
Angelo Giuseppe (2020-11-28 17:50:23+00:00): Ciao Jrachi, come Cai Seregno ogni anno organizziamo una gita nelle Langhe e in zona La Morra ci sono diversi percorsi tutti segnalati con cartelli e relative documentazioni ecco il motivo per cui ho fatto la relazione.
Jrachi (2020-11-28 17:53:26+00:00): Quindi non è un percorso a catasto?
Peccato!
Tienimi informato sulle prossime gite nella zona.
Grazie.
Ivo
user_5359 (2019-10-31 17:46:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 
Short inquiry to the key service_times: the services are held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case add a Su (followed by space character) at the beginning of the value. Please notice also: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
aceman444 (2021-01-10 00:24:24+00:00): Zdravim, co na bode https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/306468680 znamena aerialway=yes? Hodnota 'station' bola spravna. A na lanovky sa nepouziva public_transport=station.
🇨🇿 Roman Horník (2021-05-22 14:30:18+00:00): Zdravím, nejsem autorem úpravy tagů, měnil jsem jen pozici.
aceman444 (2024-10-21 20:26:37+00:00): Ale ano, zmenili ste to Vy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/306468680/history .
mavl (2019-11-01 17:47:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Гидрант находится внутри жилого дома. Вероятно, это ошибка.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6935377922
mavl (2019-11-01 17:50:25+00:00): Ещё гидрант внутри жилого дома:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6935378011
mavl (2019-11-01 18:12:01+00:00): Ещё гидрант внутри жилого дома:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6935377978  
  
Похоже, что этот пакет правок добавляет гидранты, которые уже есть на карте. Например, эти точки явно обозначают одно и то же:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6935377970  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6752860537  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6935377969  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6752860536
mavl (2019-11-01 18:28:59+00:00): Опечатки:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6935377984  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6935378018
alphensebezorger (2019-10-31 17:41:33+00:00): Hallo Peter,

Heb ik iets gemist? Moet er naast note=24-82 nu ook nog ref=24-82 op een knooppuntroute?

En deze node is zeker per ongeluk verplaatst?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1442839220

Groetjes, Alphensebezorger.
Peter Elderson (2019-10-31 18:07:26+00:00): Nee, moet niet, ik doe het als proefje voor Hof van Delfland omdat A. volgens diverse bronnen het buiten de bedoeling van de key note valt (en daar hebben ze gelijk in, zie wiki) maar wél binnen de scope van de ref-key. En B. doordat het in de note staat ipv de ref, zie je in de routelijst van waymarkedtrails een lijst relatienummers staan. Zij gaan ons misbruik van note niet overnemen, en ref wordt wel ondersteund voor knooppunten en routes. Dus daarom maak ik even een showmodel, zonder de oude gegevens te wissen. Ook om te kijken hoe vlot zoiets gaat.
Die node moet ik per ongeluk verplaatst hebben, inderdaad. Ik zit eigenlijk helemaal niet op de kaart te werken, dus ik begrijp niet hoe dat kan. Ik zal het herstellen!
dvdhoven (2019-10-31 19:45:40+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=67817
alphensebezorger (2019-10-31 21:28:18+00:00): Waarom heb je voor een proefje of showmodel in vredesnaam 275 routes nodig. Een handvol lijkt me genoeg om allerlei varianten te proberen. Ga je ze allemaal een voor een aanklikken in waymarkedtrails om te kijken of het resultaat hetzelfde is als bij de eerste? Bovendien heb je alleen in deze changeset al van 535 relaties een nieuwe versie in de database gezet, grotendeels zonder er iets aan te wijzigen als ik het goed zie. Dit begint verdomd veel op een mechanical edit te lijken, die bovendien ondoordacht lijkt uitgevoerd.
Als je dingen wilt testen, kun je ook je eigen OSM en waymarkedtrails gaan draaien. De source-code is beschikbaar.
Peter Elderson (2019-10-31 22:24:47+00:00): Hoe een paar routes eruitzien met verschillende varianten van note/name/ref en of het geen problemen gaf heb ik vooraf getest. Nu kijken hoe het eruitziet als een heel netwerk refs heeft. Ik voeg alleen maar toe, ik haal niks weg, en ik gebruik de tag conform de wiki's (in tegenstelling tot note, wat hier niet voor bedoeld is, maar daar kom ik niet aan). Als het resultaat niet goed is kan ik het heel snel weer verwijderen (revert is niet nodig). Wat is er trouwens ondoordacht?
Peter Elderson (2019-10-31 22:32:47+00:00): Deze changeset had ik trouwens teruggedraaid wegens die nodes.
alphensebezorger (2019-10-31 23:28:46+00:00): Je gaat "kijken hoe het eruitziet als een heel netwerk refs heeft". Waar ga je kijken? Waarnaar precies? Ik zou niet weten welke extra informatie je denkt te kunnen vinden.

Ik gebruikte het woord ondoordacht omdat ik de indruk heb dat je nieuwe versies van 535 relaties upload, terwijl er maar een klein deel daadwerkelijk andere tags of leden heeft gekregen. Dat lijkt mij onnodige belasting van OSM hardware.
Als ik denk 20 wegen gewijzigd te hebben, en bij het uploaden blijken er 200 klaar staan om verstuurd te worden, controleer ik wat er mis is gegaan.
crossmyloof (2019-10-31 17:25:39+00:00): Both Clarkston Hall and Library are addressed off Clarkston Road. The name of Clrkston Road only changes in front of Stamperland Crescent and then reverts back to Clarkston Road. The OS is authoritative on this based on the OneScotland Gazetteer
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-10-31 19:15:36+00:00): Ok I was unaware of this, thanks
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-15 05:28:51+00:00): Reverted by DWG for use of Google Map information

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139897019
viloan (2019-10-31 17:19:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!