piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 17:35:43+00:00): Added website back here
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 17:33:56+00:00): Phone and website added back here
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 17:29:45+00:00): Name added back here
JJIglesias (2021-09-24 04:47:24+00:00): Gracias Excelente. Poco a poco se va mejorando. Si tienes un Celular Android tambien puedes usar la aplicacion STREETCOMPLETE, que te permite llenar datos del mapa de la zona donde te encuentres...
Frans S (2021-09-24 08:16:43+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Don't oversize buildings. Follow the rooflines accurate.  small buildings next to a bigger on needs to be mapped as an individual building.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111624308
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 17:20:30+00:00): Added website back here
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 17:18:55+00:00): Added phone and website back here
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 17:17:35+00:00): I've added the phone number back here.
The challenge should not suggest to remove data like that, but if a change is suggested that you're not sure about then keep the previous value.
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 17:15:01+00:00): Same here with the name, which I've added back
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-24 17:13:12+00:00): Did the challenge really suggest the name be removed?!
I've added it back here
RedAuburn (2021-09-24 21:37:07+00:00): ooh no :( I've messed up big time, I removed the suggested tag in map roulette when it was incorrect, assuming that it would retain the existing tag. It seems like it just overwrites it anyway...

Thank you so much for cleaning up the changesets so far, I'll go over them and clean them up :)
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-25 10:21:01+00:00): No worries
I guess MapRoulette maybe doesn't make it clear enough what's happening
Don't let that put you off helping with the challenge though, there are still loads to go!
Frans S (2021-09-24 08:13:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Do not oversize your mappings. 
1 occasion (middle bottom) you mapped 3 buildings as 1. 2 of them were already mapped on another task.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111624695
Eiim (2021-09-24 12:15:40+00:00): Thanks for your improvements around Upham! I am glad that you have switched from angle to slope, but you still have a few paths with the surface_id tag. As these are the only uses of this tag worldwide (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1bsm), I don't know what they're supposed to represent that isn't represented by the standard surface tag. In general, we avoid tags in OSM which aren't human-readable, and material_id=2 certainly doesn't make sense to me.

I also believe that some of the entrances you marked are exit-only, which I will check in person today.
Eiim (2021-09-24 12:37:13+00:00): I looked again at the wiki and the correct tag for slope would be incline. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline) This also appears to be the only use of "slope" worldwide. Where there is no compelling reason otherwise, it is recommended to use the tags documented on the wiki to ensure that the database is globally consistent.
Eiim (2021-09-24 14:56:12+00:00): I've fixed the entrances here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111651823), but I haven't touched your unique tags yet (I've also noticed that you've added a wheelchair_barrier=3 tag on some steps).

I'd love to talk about how to make OSM work best for your project. I think that everything you want to accomplish can likely be easily done with existing tags that won't confuse and may even help other users. If you're on campus, we could meet up in person to talk, or we can chat remotely.
NicoKasz (2021-09-27 13:28:37+00:00): Thank you so much for reaching out. I'm working on a team here at Miami to make wheelchair friendly routing around campus. To be frank, I wasn't sure about some of the OSM standards and just dove in. Ill make the fixes you mentioned and adapt the project to take them into account.
mueschel (2021-10-02 16:33:34+00:00): Hi,
what does "wheelchair_barrier" mean? It's not used in other places and not documented.
Shaun das Schaf (2021-09-26 13:55:29+00:00): Hallo Procyon_X, willkommen bei OSM!

Auf welcher Grundlage basiert das Verschieben etlicher Straßenverläufe im Hölzle?

Für mich sieht es ein bisschen so aus, als hättest du die Straßenverläufe einfach anhand des Bing Luftbilds neu ausgerichtet, ohne auf die benachbarten Gebäude oder auf den Bildversatz zu achten. Einfach gesagt: du kannst nicht automatisch davon ausgehen, dass das Luftbild korrekt ausgerichtet ist und die gemappten Straßen falsch, sondern es kann genau so gut auch umgekehrt sein.

Bei Fragen oder wenn du Hilfe benötigst, kannst du dich gerne melden!

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Procyon_X (2021-09-26 14:05:21+00:00): Hey Shaun,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Da habe ich als absoluter Anfänger einen Fehler gemacht.

Dachte fälschlicherweise, es wäre eine gute Idee, beim Hinzufügen der fehlenden Wege, die Straßenführung gleich noch anzupassen. Aber wie du erkannt hast, war das nur anhand der Luftbilder und nicht basierend auf Tracking Daten o.Ä..

Wie geht man am Besten vor, um das wieder zu korrigieren?

Danke und schöne Grüße
Procyon
Shaun das Schaf (2021-09-26 17:38:16+00:00): Hallo Procyon,

kein Problem, das ging mir am Anfang ganz genauso. Fehler sind ganz normal, also lass dich davon bloß nicht abhalten :-)

Ich habe das Verschieben der Straßen rückgängig gemacht. Deine anderen Änderungen sind aber trotzdem noch vorhanden.

Es ist leider manchmal wirklich schwierig den genauen Verlauf von Straßen und Wegen herauszufinden. Zum einen können Luftbilder verschoben sein, zum anderen Verzerren manche Luftbilder die wahren Gegebenheiten auch recht stark, sobald es sich um Berge handelt anstatt flache Landschaft (das Bing-Luftbild fällt mir da z.B. häufiger negativ auf). Mappt man nach einem Luftbild, kann es mit einem anderen schon wieder falsch aussehen. Abweichungen von 5-10 Metern sind aber ganz normal und unproblematisch und fallen in der Realität nur selten ins Gewicht. Außerdem hat ja auch das GPS von Handy o.ä. immer Abweichungen.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
MxxCon (2021-09-24 03:21:43+00:00): Would "pavilion" be more accurate value rather than gazebo? afaik gazebos are round..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111625041
KingKull2112 (2021-09-24 08:49:16+00:00): I looked at the documentation for that and I don't think fits, this is an open air shelter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=pavilion 
On here, it defines what a gazebo and it seems like it's an interchangeable word in US English
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dshelter
MxxCon (2021-09-25 01:51:13+00:00): building=pavilion is a bit of a different thing, more related to sports. What I meant is of a shelter type pavilion.
KingKull2112 (2021-09-25 02:56:25+00:00): Ah, I hadn't seen that shelter type. I'll fix it now
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2021-10-16 08:12:43+00:00): Hi, you added `shop=primary` to this node ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3759828395 ), but you had previously tagged it as a a bar (`amenity=bar`). Is this one place *really* a bar *and* a convience store? Both?
Random Points (2021-10-16 09:52:23+00:00): Hi,
The OMaps client does not show the additional fields after updating shop name and POI type. The POI has been cleaned manually in rev 112571792.
Frans S (2021-09-24 08:08:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111625448
Frans S (2021-09-24 08:06:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square rectangular buildings. 
Do not collect multiple buildings (2)s

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111625454
Frans S (2021-09-24 08:04:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square each rectangular building and do not include the shadow in your mapping

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111625504
Frans S (2021-09-24 08:02:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key.
1 building  included the yard next to it.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111625619
vulasala (2021-09-27 06:15:09+00:00): Hi Hoàng Tuấn Việt,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 934192012 and way 986523399, as these ways creating classification gap.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111625647
Исраилжан (2021-09-24 04:22:33+00:00): Прошу прощения город Уштобе
eggie (2021-09-24 06:26:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Ter Apelerstraat 12 ligt nu ergens ten westen van de Ruiten Aa.
Za zal wellicht per abuis zijn gegaan. Meestal veroorzaakt door schuiven met de kaart terwijl je een node geselecteerd hebt. De (adres) node schuift van mee en alles wat er aan vast zit.


je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111626399
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-24 06:30:14+00:00): Adres Ter Apelerstraat 12 heb ik teruggeplaatst.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-09-24 06:28:48+00:00): Het adres van het Rustpunt is een traformatorhuisje.  Klopt dit wel?

MVG
eggie
De Woeste Grond (2021-09-24 06:56:19+00:00): Klopt het is aan de buitenkant daar van.
eggie (2021-09-24 07:16:19+00:00): Oke .. duidelijk
MVG
eggie
ftcat (2021-09-26 06:05:39+00:00): Hi,

Be careful when using a shortcut such as 'Q' in JOSM to square off a number of selected buildings as any circular buildings selected will end up a straight line. In Zambia many buildings will be circular
kartonage (2021-09-26 09:12:40+00:00): Hej,

why did you mass delete the existing buildings?

Redrawing the buildings with lower quality is not useful.

Эй,

почему вы массово удалили существующие постройки?

Перерисовывать здания с более низким качеством бесполезно.
Frans S (2021-09-24 08:00:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111627556
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-09-24 05:40:39+00:00): Hi Nikolai E,

your landuses are of great quality, but if I would have one magical wish I would like to ask you NOT to glue together landuses with streets.

Kind regards,
Ivan
TimeVod (2021-09-24 06:25:18+00:00): Hi S. Novicki,

please take a look on the visualization of your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111627868
You rightfully deleted the inexact buildings existing before, but those you mapped are not straightened (press key "Q") and very garbled!

#AMD
5m4u9 (2021-09-25 05:55:29+00:00): Hola, genial que te animaste a usar StreetComplete, es fácil, rápido ir mejorando el mapa. Gracias por contribuir!

Si encuentras algún error de nombre, el sentido de circulación de autos está mal puedes usar las "notas del mapa". En la página web a la derecha desde abajo hay un icono de "globito con signo +" (2da desde abajo), pinchas ahí, mueves al lugar correcto la flecha y escribes una breve descripción del error u omisión...
SpecializedRider (2021-10-10 02:10:56+00:00): I've reverted parts of this changeset as it has been done incorrectly. The bike route should be one continuous route, so I've removed the ones you added incorrectly.
ovruni (2021-09-24 07:01:14+00:00): Hola bbgous, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios con el texto "mas casas" se ha agregado un parque que no cumple con el criterio de verificabilidad [0], por lo que lo he retirado. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
Frans S (2021-09-24 07:58:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key and do not connect nodes of buildings to eachother.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111629747
Frans S (2021-09-24 07:30:49+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A short remark
You map some buildings with 5 nodes due to the form of the shadow.
What you see is the saddleform roof from an angle which gives the building a 5 corner form
Just map them strickt rectangular without the shadow.
best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2021-09-24 06:48:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-24 07:00:08+00:00): Updateaanvraag 'nieuwe adressen' loopt via forum van OSM
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=841983#p841983

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-24 12:31:01+00:00): Nieuwe adresnodes zijn geimporteerd.
Historische adressen verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Jakka (2021-09-24 13:37:48+00:00): aandacht public_transport	stop_position is de plaats op een highway waar de bus stopt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position en "highway"="bus_stop"ect...
is daar waar het bord met info over de halte staat steeds langs de weg nooit erop
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:04:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
CENTRALHUB (2022-01-12 08:13:03+00:00): 你好。你所绘制的森林https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986567645 之中。覆盖了大量不属于森林的城镇农村居民地与农田。这种粗略的制图方法并不是OSM可以接受的。如果可能希望尽量精确地绘制。可以参考这一片区域的标准。 https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/29.1477/118.3653

如果你的作图仍在草稿阶段，建议暂时先保存在本地，等细化完毕后再上传。谢谢
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2022-08-27 17:21:45+00:00): Hi Please no duplicated tagging. The caravan_site is already on the map.
Greetz,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-09-24 07:56:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
You did not square the buildings (none of them) 
and map more accurate and take your time. 
Do not connect nodes of buildings to other features.
Did you change the offset of your imagery
Everywhere is an offset of appr 16 mtr.
I invalidated your task 207

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111630674
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
pio2_122 (2021-09-24 10:43:21+00:00): Dlaczego błędnie modyfikujesz dane adresowe?

W miejscowościach, gdzie nie ma nadanych nazw ulic obowiązuje następujący schemat tagowania adresów: addr:place=[Miejscowość]
addr:housenumber=[numer budynku]
addr:postcode=[kod pocztowy]

Nie stosuje się tam tagu addr:city.

Więcej informacji: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897

Proszę o poprawę lub wycofanie tych zmian.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-09-24 07:50:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping.  Don't connect nodes to other features like roads


FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111631539
Frans S (2021-09-24 07:48:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111631704