piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
4004 (2022-07-21 11:22:53+00:00): я и забыл уже.
у меня было представление, что сбор должен быть раздельным, чтобы попадать под recycling ("This tag is for sites where waste of specific types is accepted to be reused or recycled - if the site is for disposing of arbitrary waste, consider a different tag as listed under Waste Processing.").
а как минимум некоторые из этих мусорок под разделение не приспособлены. 
плюс не знаю, может ли мусорка быть на балансе предприятия, которое и решает, куда везти. ну и слабо представляю, как можно переработать домашний мусор, пищевые отходы у нас вроде пока не умеют
joost schouppe (2022-08-10 10:42:59+00:00): Hoi Louis,
Heb je voor deze reeks changesets toestemming gevraagd aan tandarts.be? Ik zie in hun disclaimer het volgende staan: "Deze website en zijn inhoud zijn beschermd door copyright (©VVT) en zijn enkel beschikbaar voor persoonlijk gebruik. Reproductie is enkel toegelaten na voorafgaandelijke schriftelijke toestemming van het Verbond der Vlaamse Tandartsen vzw."
Op basis van een website van een individuele tandarts kan je wel eens iets overnemen, maar met dit soort site moet je voorzichtig zijn. Soms zit er een verdienmodel achter hun data. Bovendien kan de data verouder zijn.
user_15543111 (2022-07-15 13:16:50+00:00): Sorry for the large changeset, it is because Alaska is splitted in the OSM changeset map. All edits are in Alaska and the neighbouring area.
Syl (2023-12-07 11:03:53+00:00): Bonjour, après passage sur place je viens de mettre à jour ce bout de chemin de fer abandonné. Seulement une toute petite partie existe encore aujourd'hui.
Si vous voulez ajoutez des chemins de fer dont il ne reste absolument rien OpenHistoricalMap  est plus adapté : https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/
Bonne journée.
GPar (2022-07-18 09:55:43+00:00): Alcuni edifici intersecano via Corziatto. Li vedi su osmose
canfe (2022-07-22 08:47:19+00:00): dOVREI AVERLI SISTEMATI TUTTI. gRAZIE.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-15 13:47:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123654917 where the changeset comment is: Reverted what looks like a spam edit
mavl (2026-05-03 05:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 182142872 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20224].
조수미 (2022-07-15 13:53:57+00:00): Please press "Q" to straighten buildings. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123654745
Omegatherion (2022-07-18 17:23:10+00:00): Die Quelle irrt in meheren Behauptungen. Fußgänger sind auf Fahrradstraßen erlaubt. Das wurde auch schon mal in der KN richtig dargestellt.
https://www.kn-online.de/lokales/kiel/konfliktpotenzial-auf-der-veloroute-2X2ZFLN64RL63YBJJLSBCXD4NU.html
Discostu36 (2022-11-03 13:17:53+00:00): Bitte im Zweifel an die StVO halten und nicht an den NDR. Dort steht in Anlage 2 Abschnitt 5: "Im Übrigen gelten die Vorschriften über die Fahrbahnbenutzung und über die Vorfahrt." Das bedeutet: Wenn kein Fußweg vorhanden, am Fahrbahnrand laufen.
LordGarySugar (2022-07-27 01:46:05+00:00): Hi, thank you for adding these recent developments to OpenStreetMap.
Please make sure not to remove useful tags, such as amenity=bus_station, which I have re-added.
If you have any questions in the future, I would be happy to answer them.
FriendsofFairlandsFarm (2022-07-28 15:29:07+00:00): Hi LordGarySugar,
The amenity=bus_station tag was removed from the former bus station site, which has now been demolished. That site is currently undergoing redelvopment and it's new name shall be announced in September. There are multiple changes to bus network provision in relation to the new interchange and these shall all need reviewed as a result of the changes which have taken place. Our local bus users group is advising it's partners within the local councils and bus service operators on the changes it needs to make, and errors which need correction. This will include removal and/or amendment to the relationships the old terminus had with the old routes. In due course, when updated ariel imagery becomes available, the buildings, roads, pathways and landscaping can be more accurately shown.
Regards,
David
LordGarySugar (2022-07-29 23:11:03+00:00): Sorry if my comment was not clear, but did actually remove amenity=bus_station from the new station as well as the old one. Regardless, it's not the end of the world.

As for updating the bus routes, this will take a while, as many of the bus routes in Stevenage are out of date and some are missing. I did update route 1 and 6 a couple of months ago, but this is a time consuming process, so if the councils or bus operators collaborate to identify errors, that would be great!
FriendsofFairlandsFarm (2022-07-30 00:39:54+00:00): Since end of June, all the town services now have SB prefixes, and just last week the SB6 route was  altered, and SB11 introduced with the Mon-Fri SB10 withdrawn. That aside, the underlying issue seems to be that neither council officers (and councillors), nor the bus operators, have the technical awareness to know that these things need to be considered, or the skillset to make changes successfully.
Suggest you contact me directly through BUGS - Bus Users Group Stevenage [sg1bugs on FB, Insta, Twitter], or secretarybugs@gmail.com so we might take this forward, perhaps with a view to establishing a formal arrangement for the work involved?
Kind regards, David
ff5722 (2023-01-28 14:46:29+00:00): 为什么要删除了列车关系？
北巷猫眠 (2023-01-29 11:44:46+00:00): 个人认为除非有较为频繁的维护，各车次列车的停靠站容易随调图而发生变动，造成信息不准确，故删除。
北巷猫眠 (2023-01-29 11:46:36+00:00): 就我移除列车关系的当日，就已有多趟车次的停靠站发生了变动。
bkil (2022-08-06 19:51:08+00:00): Az incline=up_25% helyett nem incline=25% kellene? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
Asztalos András Sándor (2022-08-08 10:15:12+00:00): Módosítottam
MxxCon (2022-07-16 02:05:25+00:00): Hello.
As documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned: the use of "abandoned=yes" is discouraged, and it stead it better to use abandoned: lifecycle prefix. It would be great if you updated these tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123656479
eggie (2022-07-15 14:54:42+00:00): Beste Edwin..

Er zijn zo van die afspraken binnen OSM om geen gebouwen in te tekenen die nog in de planfase zitten.
Adressen horen niet nogmaals op de gebouwomtrek.

Gebouwen worden tzt gewoon geïmporteerd.

Je zou een vlak  landuse=construction kunnen toevoegen waar ze gaan bouwen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-15 15:03:58+00:00): Het huis kun je evt als proposed:building=house intekenen
house=proposed
Die nname=Olmentuin 36 Steenbergen 'moet er echt af.. net als het adres.
We krijgen anders toch een kaart vol met adresnamen?
eggie (2022-07-15 16:25:42+00:00): herstel ...  building=proposed
proposed=house
eggie (2022-07-15 14:57:38+00:00): Tip   Het pad kun je classificeren als highway=track ipv path

Groet
eggie
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:06:02+00:00): Me parece que pones este punto en la categoría equivocada.
bxl-forever (2022-07-15 16:37:03+00:00): Hi,
This area is triggering a warning about "amenity inside amenity".
If you know the exact span of the police station, you can draw it as an area (slightly smaller than the building, as long as the node for the Centre de jour/Dagcentrum is outside of it).
Otherwise, you can tag the police station as a node.  That would solve the issue.
Thanks.
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:09:40+00:00): The building is a police station with one room that is used for as the dagcentrum
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-17 00:14:34+00:00): home
Frans S (2022-09-17 09:12:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions). 

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123658364
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-15 20:10:24+00:00): não coloque um nome tipo "home", só coloque nome se for próprio
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-16 04:37:04+00:00): BJMTR 你好，有其他编辑者反映你在高速岔路口的编辑不够妥当

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction

这是目前关于此类岔口信息标注的文档，以供参考。
hanchao (2022-07-16 04:39:04+00:00): motorway_junction的出口方向应该放在destination里，不应该放在ref里。
BJMTR (2022-07-16 05:33:10+00:00): 好的，稍后改正
Branko Kokanovic (2023-08-23 17:51:30+00:00): RGZ kaze da je ovo Njegoseva 10, a ne Njegoseva 12. Promenio sam u 140287428, a ti vrati ako sam zeznuo
Supaplex030 (2022-12-27 15:38:41+00:00): Hallo webpassenger, danke für die Ergänzung der Infotafeln zum Rundgang Stasi-Zentrale! Zur Info: Ich habe gerade den Namen und die Beschreibung der Tafeln getauscht, da der Name dem jeweiligen Thema einer Infotafel entsprechen sollte. Auf vielen Kartendarstellungen wird "name" auch gerendert, sodass keine irreführenden Beschriftungen entstehen (darüber bin ich darauf aufmerksam geworden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3493602).

Du hattest den Tafeln jeweils eine Nummer gegeben - sie sind vermutlich stationsartig durchnummeriert? Ich habe das versucht durch die Ergänzung von "Tafel Nr. X" in der Beschreibung kenntlich zu machen sowie durch Ergänzung einer "ref". Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9810594725

Vielleicht kannst du ja mal einen Blick drauf werfen, ob das so in Ordnung ist.

Danke jedenfalls fürs ergänzen!
lg, Alex
webpassenger (2023-01-03 16:14:37+00:00): Hallo Alex, 
zuerst einmal Danke für die Korrekturen und die Info. Schließlich lebt OSM ja davon.  Die Nummern habe ich von der Übersichtskarte auf den  Infotafeln. Dort sind die einzelnen Tafeln durchnummeriert. Daher finde ich das mit der "ref" eine sehr gute Idee.

Danke und viele Grüße 
Mirko
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:12:56+00:00): No use el mapa para marcas personales, solo información de relevancia pública.
eggie (2022-07-15 16:21:20+00:00): Top.. nu nog het dubbele adres verwijderen. Dus nooit een adres op de gebouwomtrek. Je hebt immers een adresnode aangemaakt.
Je ziet nu nog 2x nr 36 staan. 

In het begin wordt gescreend... uiteraard om te helpen. 

En formeel...  
proposed:building=proposed
proposed=house

Wordt er al gebouwd?.. zo ja stuur een terugmelding naar het Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=olmentuin%203&resultOffset=0&objectId=0851200000015423&geometry.x=80279.569&geometry.y=399102.25900041&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0851010000014017

Even op het potloodje rechts klikken


Mapse,
eggie
felipeeugenio (2022-07-15 16:03:50+00:00): Hola Rodrigo.
El que sean caminos no mantenidos no tiene relación alguna con la clasificación del camino. unclassified es mas o menos lo que conocemos en Chile como caminos vecinales. Son transitados regularmente e incluso pueden estar pavimentados (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified)

Lo que estás cambiando ahora, por lo menos en la foto satelital, no parece calzar.
saludos
felipeeugenio (2022-07-15 16:04:21+00:00): En varios tramos me queda la duda de que pueda pasar un auto normal de 4 ruedas.

saludos
A127 (2022-07-16 08:02:15+00:00): Beste H4N5,
Je hebt je vergist bij het intekenen van deze fietsenstalling (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078854096) deze stond reeds op de kaart (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674697784)
H4N5-antw (2022-07-16 08:17:50+00:00): Dank voor uw opmerkzaamheid, merkwaardig, dat eerdere stalling niet werd opgemerkt / getoond in iD?
archie (2022-07-15 16:40:31+00:00): Hej, jag har reverterat detta changeset. Byggnaderna syns fortfarande på flera bakgrundsbilder. Vid sådant förhållande skall life-cycle-tagg användas, så att inte annan user ritar in byggnaderna på nytt.
EAman (2022-08-08 18:54:11+00:00): Bra. Jag hade inte koll på razed: även om jag använt andra lifecycle-prefix ibland.
archie (2022-08-08 19:23:40+00:00): Ingen fara. Tack för Vänerleden!
LudovicG (2026-04-21 19:00:11+00:00): Merci pour votre contribution.
Je me suis permis de placer la ref contenue dans "description" dans "ref" et de supprimer le "name" qui n'apporte pas d'information supplémentaire.
SekeRob (2022-07-15 16:52:18+00:00): Yup, forest render again, but it will take a few hours before all zoom levels will do that again.
Noen (2022-07-19 17:30:22+00:00): Hei! «Gårdsplass» er ikke et navn, men en beskrivelse. Det er ingen grunn til å legge til «Gårdsplass» som både navn og beskrivelse.
Det er ikke noe jeg ville kalt et en gårdsplass eller et gårdstun her. Er det bygd noe nytt?
Retting (2022-07-20 12:57:31+00:00): Her er det 3 og 4- dobbel garasje med verksted, sommerfjøs, oppstillingsplass for maskiner etc midt inne på landbrukseiendommen og hører til gårdsbruket. Tydeligvis mye brukt område. I høyeste grad gårdsplass.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-16 13:32:28+00:00): sorry for typo edit - I thought that I disabled uploads
bxl-forever (2022-08-31 15:19:04+00:00): Have you finished your tests?  You might want to delete your node now.
sensien (2022-09-01 07:06:38+00:00): I have finished my tests in Finland for the summer yes. I was thinking of just leaving it there though as it is on our land. There are only about 5 summer cabins down there, and it’s a good 10km from a proper road  so it wouldn’t affect anyone.
ovruni (2022-07-15 18:34:32+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado varios objetos sin motivo aparente, indicando solamente "DETALLES", de manera similar al conjunto de cambios 123481564, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. 
Saludos
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:00:53+00:00): Gracias
adas (2025-12-28 20:03:23+00:00): czy te prace jeszcze trwają?
Hb- (2023-01-05 19:37:11+00:00): With this change the Gliesmarode relation ends at the K3 road. What is with the part of Gliesmarode east of this road?
Probably this "Statistischer Bezirk" is only a part of this suburb.
mjans (2022-07-17 17:17:18+00:00): Zou het kunnen dat je wandelknooppunt 282 (per ongeluk) hebt verwijderd? Deze stond aan het gemeentehuis in Hechtel-Eksel.
Devdatta (2022-11-28 07:19:35+00:00): HI Heinz, Did you want to tag this way with level 8 or 9 ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10997987
eggie (2022-07-19 09:49:49+00:00): Dat nieuwe fietspad heeft overlappende stukken. We noemen dat duplicated ways. Er lag een brug op een brug.. De bovenste heb ik verwijderd.
Wellicht heb je iets aan deze achtergrondfoto om het helemaal actueel te krijgen
MVG
eggie
MxxCon (2022-07-16 02:21:41+00:00): Hello.
OSM can not contain space in them. In this case it should be "happy_hours".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123666050
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-21 00:05:36+00:00): Hello,
I wonder if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907724053/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907724052 might actually be partially the same here?  I noticed the first of these because the tags were caught up in an "automated edit" that someone did in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125817813 , but looking a bit closer, it looks a bit more complicated than just one odd tag.  As well as the potentially duplicated ways, some of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907724053 looks like it might still be wide enough for 4-wheel traffic (so the access=private might make sense there) but some not.
Best Regards,
Andy
Gazer75 (2022-08-29 09:59:56+00:00): Why did you tag all distribution lines as 25kV when they are in fact 14.4kV?
Gazer75 (2022-08-29 10:08:36+00:00): Mixing line to line and line to neutral will make things rather confusing.
Gazer75 (2022-08-29 10:19:24+00:00): OK, i see what you've done. When they branch off a single phase with neutral you tag it as 14.4kV.
Its all good, ignore my ignorance :)
user_5359 (2022-07-20 08:21:25+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieht dir nochmal https://www.osm.org/node/685735080/history an. Was ist die Bedeutung des Tag e=platform?
Strubbl (2022-07-20 18:08:57+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Hinweis. Das war ein Versehen. Ich habe es mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123861957 korrigiert.
eggie (2022-07-15 22:59:46+00:00): Hi Evian. Please use operator=.. not name=

Greetz,
eggie
jmarchon (2022-07-16 12:38:20+00:00): First changeset from a Linux-based system!
user_3022894 (2023-04-09 20:25:03+00:00): Hi Olaf,

diese residential-Fläche hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034643436/history

halte ich für entbehrlich bzw. nicht richtig. Es handelt sich schlicht und ergreifend um einen Parkplatz, der in einer darunter liegenden Fläche mit gleichen Umrissen bereits eingezeichnet ist.

Mit "Wohngebiet" hat das dort nicht viel zu tun. 

Wäre es daher in Ordnung, wen ich die residential-Fläche lösche?

Viele Grüße
Lukas aka Elefant
janolezab (2022-07-15 23:30:28+00:00): Not sure if OSM should contain your personal test data
Volodymyr D-k (2022-07-16 05:52:11+00:00): Привіт! Дякую, що змінюєте назви вулиць, але дозволю собі дві невеликі уваги:
1) варто залишати old_name (в ідеалі - усіма мовами, які були в описі раніше), аби люди могли і за старою назвою знайти потрібну адресу
2) будинки на перейменованій вулиці варто під'єднати до нової назви
Приємних редагувань!
cytryn (2022-07-15 19:59:45+00:00): Błąd w opisie, oczywiście chodzi o Batorego
E de Wit (2022-07-15 20:12:34+00:00): Aanvulling:
In de Dragtster courant, 08-08-1878, 'binnen- en buitenlandsch nieuws' wordt zowel het aanvoeren van koolzaad benoemd als de observatie dat het jaar ervoor (1877) er nog water in het meer stond, vandaar start_date=1878
user_5359 (2022-07-17 08:43:58+00:00): Phyllo! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1078901063. what is the meaning of the tag John = Krasinski?
Please don‘t add any private information  of the owner of the building.
wikimax (2022-07-17 09:16:33+00:00): Hi. Sorry, this was just a funny mistake.  The name has nothing to do with the spot an must have remained in cache while copying the tags.
I just deleted it.
MxxCon (2022-07-16 02:26:30+00:00): Why did you map this as a relation?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123667929
larryv (2022-07-16 03:28:40+00:00): Aren't multipolygons inherently relations? I remapped it as a multipolygon so the fencing and gates formally delineate the cemetery boundary instead of merely overlapping the edges of the area.

'[Multipolygons] can also be useful to make the distinction between linear objects (e.g. a fence surrounding a property, tagged on the way) and the area inside (tagged on the multipolygon relation) without having to draw overlapping ways. [...] For example, a forest could be delineated by four fences, in which case the four ways would be tagged with the barrier tag, but could still be used as "outer" members of the forest relation.'

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
MxxCon (2022-07-16 03:40:21+00:00): The way you mapped it is not wrong, just _in my opinion_ needlessly complicated. When making changes to features one have to remember to make some changes to the relation and some to the underlying ways..Sometimes when you delete a way it brakes the relation in some way, etc.. Where as if it were a single polygon with another way for a fence with gate nodes on it, it's straight forward to edit each.
Again it's not wrong to map it your way, just don't see the significant benefit of such added details vs the complexity that relations bring w/ them. 🙂
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-07-27 18:16:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124152916 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for adding nonsense to OSM and vandalising OSM.
literan (2022-07-17 19:11:29+00:00): не надо присоединять детские площадки к линиям highway, которые проводятся посередине дорог. Детские площадки не находятся на территории дорог. Откачу, это некорректная правка, ухудшающая точность.
janolezab (2022-07-15 23:28:06+00:00): This adds neither a streetname nor a restaurant, just a garbage node instead.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6#URL_+_authentication
"When testing your software against the API you should consider using https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ instead of the live-api."
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123668310
janolezab (2022-07-27 23:07:51+00:00): My suggestion to use the dev-api apparently did not fall on fertile ground.
ivanbranco (2022-07-15 20:39:02+00:00): Survey? Really? 👀

Also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits
user_15543111 (2022-07-15 23:20:09+00:00): Sorry, there was accidently a mistake when making this edit. I will revert it completely. This wasn't on purpose.
user_15543111 (2022-07-15 23:23:22+00:00): Reverted in 123671761.
Misiek_G (2022-07-15 20:31:46+00:00): poprawka - miało być landuse - Rytro
janolezab (2022-07-15 23:28:42+00:00): Same as in https://osm.org/changeset/123668310
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123668745
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-07-27 18:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124152916 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for adding nonsense to OSM and vandalising OSM.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-17 00:14:22+00:00): casa?
eggie (2022-07-15 22:58:02+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. Volgens de conventies van OSM Nederland worden webshops niet opgenomen in het bestand van OSM.
MVG
eggie
watmildon (2026-02-02 18:44:25+00:00): What did you mean by "Ro" for the light character? I don't see documentation for that value and would love to get it cleaned up or supported for lighthouse map.

https://watmildon.github.io/lighthouse-map-libre/
Natfoot (2026-02-03 20:05:44+00:00): I don't know if I had found this. This light rotates. So the light is constant put and does not so much flash.
Natfoot (2026-02-03 20:06:39+00:00): that project is great. I wanted to do something like that with all lights on the map. landing lights, street lights traffic lights, etc. . .
watmildon (2026-02-05 05:13:50+00:00): Hmmm. For purposes of lighthouse map I will treat Ro (rotate) the same as F (flash). To a stationary observer they're kinda the same.

I had a lot of fun working on the map. It's very silly and mesmerizing.
Stylez995 (2022-07-15 22:45:03+00:00): Heisann Kunyasobe!

Den nordre del av Akersgata ble ferdig (men er ikke åpent for trafikk ennå), og det har ikke lenger to adskilte kjørefelt. Jeg har sjekket området personlig tidligere i dag og den har pullerter som skal la busser og autoriserte motorkjøretøy passere

I september så skal 37-bussen kjøre der som del av ett-års prøveperiode.

På siden så skal det ha to adskilte sykkelfelt.

Hvis du vil ha mer info kan du se på Statsbyggs nyhet her: https://www.statsbygg.no/nyheter/nordre-del-av-akersgata-star-klar.

Du kan gjøre endringer som reflekterer nyeste info, eller self-revertere bare denne endringen.
Mordechai23 (2022-09-01 17:23:55+00:00): Cześć, czy tylko ta ulica jest w strefie zamieszkania czy inne na osiedlu może też?
wertaq (2022-09-01 18:07:52+00:00): generalnie chyba mój błąd,  ul. Granitowa z całym osiedlem Willove jest oznaczona jako strefa ruchu, znak strefa ruchu jest od ulicy terenowej i asfaltowej. Na wyjeździe na teren osiedla willove nie ma znaków ze to strefa zamieszkania.
Mordechai23 (2022-09-01 20:46:45+00:00): O to nie wiedziałem nawet o znaku na początku Granitowej. Zasada jest taka, że strefa jest aż do znaku wyjazdu ze strefy albo wjazdu na drogę wewnętrzną/strefę ruchu
Hufkratzer (2022-07-16 09:27:41+00:00): Hi, falls es sich bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078916707 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078916708 um Reitplätze handelt (was ich nach den Luftbildern stark vermute) wäre ein entsprechendes Tagging als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz sinnvoller.