piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-03-23 12:55:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Рабочая группа по данным получила просьбу отменить изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок (по причине повреждения границ национального парка). Эта просьба выполнена.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
GerdP (2019-04-06 07:56:34+00:00): Moin!
Du hast mit dieser Änderung nicht nur diverse Wege gelöscht, sondern auch diverse Abbiegebeschränkungen zerstört. 
Was war der Zweck dieses "Aufräumens"?
KSMedia (2019-04-06 21:02:01+00:00): Moin,
ich habe vor einiger Zeit diese Wege und Abbiegebeschränkungen selbst eingestellt.
Ich habe es jetzt aber für wenig sinnvoll gehalten, private (6m kurze) Grundstücksauffahrten zu mappen und Abbiegebeschränkungen für diese Anzugeben. Ich wollte mit diesem "Aufräumen" die Karte klarer machen und diese von für den Nutzer unnötigen von mir selbst gemappten Details befreien.
LG
GerdP (2019-04-06 21:03:42+00:00): OK, dann lösche bitte auch die unvollständigen Relationen.
GerdP (2019-04-07 11:31:05+00:00): Ich hab's mal für Dich gemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973666
isotopicemoting (2026-04-19 19:36:16+00:00): Ich wollte die Namen nachvollziehen und fand das einigermaßen non-trivial. Um anderen das Rabbit-Hole zu ersparen, lasse ich mal die relevanten Links hier.

Quelle ist Blatt 3729 (via: https://lgln-geodaten.niedersachsen.de/startseite/karten/historische_karten/preussische_landesaufnahme_pl/preussische-landesaufnahme-1-25-000-blattubersicht-pl-211020.html) der TK25/GK25 der Preußischen Landesaufnahme.

Wer nicht gerade dem LGLN Geld geben möchte, findet die hier frei zugänglich:

http://maps.mapywig.org/m/German_maps/series/025K_TK25_west/3729_(2026)_Braunschweig_geol._1928.jpg (via: https://e-docs.geo-leo.de/map/)
https://www.geolife.de/karte/?x=10.5742&y=52.2208&z=10&l=2e076efa-3236-4a07-859b-c38e1767019b%2C1%2C1%3B93583184-d8f1-44a9-a772-a00d67bf9e18%2C0.25%2C0
Jordi MF (2019-03-21 18:10:08+00:00): Hola,
Gracias por contribuir en OSM. Respecto al cultivo que has añadido, te comento que no es correcto añadir la etiqueta "name=Tierra de cultivo". La elimino, pero mantengo lo demás porque sí que está bien.
Saludos,
Jordi
datendelphin (2019-03-21 21:20:33+00:00): Hallo 
Der Weg hat bereits ein vehicle=no, das beinhaltet auch Velos. Das zusätzliche bicycle=no ist nicht nötig 
Grüsse
Bernoullu (2019-03-22 06:33:52+00:00): Hallo,
da mein Velonavi den Weg als explizit befahrbar eingestuft hat, wollte ich an der Stelle sicher gehen. Die ofiziellen Regeln zu dem Thema, kenne ich aber nicht, daher vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Viele Grüsse
Andrea Musuruane (2020-07-16 08:59:55+00:00): Ciao. Mi spieghi perché hai riclassificato come trunk questa strada e gli svincoli relativi? Anche se non sono presenti svincoli a raso, non ha le caratteristiche di una autostrada o superstrada (ad esempio per gli accessi, dato che può essere percorso in bici a piedi o con il trattore, non c'è separazione tra i due sensi di marcia, i limiti di velocità non sono quelli di una superstrada/autostrada). Ciao, Andrea
fedc (2020-07-25 14:58:55+00:00): Ciao,
si tratta di una strada a scorrimento veloce e priva di incroci a raso.
Purtroppo i criteri di classificazione delle strade NON sono definiti con precisione, ma qui si trova qualcosa:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=trunk#Equivalenze_internazionali
Andrea Musuruane (2020-07-25 15:16:13+00:00): Ciao. Ribadisco il concetto. Non è una strada a scorrimento veloce. Per essere a scorrimento veloce deve avere almeno le stesse restituzioni di accesso di una motorway. Ciao, Andrea.
fedc (2020-07-25 15:27:48+00:00): Questa è solo una tua opinione. La pagina che ti ho linkato dice così:

"Le strade extraurbane ad una sola corsia per senso di marcia, che però non presentano incroci sul loro percorso e abbiano accessi ed uscite mediati da corsie di ac/de-celerazione potrebbero essere marcati da highway=trunk, per distinguerle da altre strade che potrebbero presentare incroci e rotonde."

Personalmente preferirei delle regole un po' più rigide, ma si può comunque leggere chiaramente che "potrebbe" essere classificata come trunk.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-07-25 17:14:51+00:00): Io leggo: "Use highway=trunk for high performance or high importance roads that don't meet the requirement for motorway.". E questa strada non rispecchia nessuna delle due citate caratteristiche.
maraf24 (2019-03-22 11:11:02+00:00): Opis zestawu zmian powinien krótko opisywać, co/dlaczego zostało zmienione.
Artek (2019-03-22 12:13:13+00:00): Jest historia co się zmieniło. Po co ta zmiana nazwy? Operator główny to PGE.
maraf24 (2019-03-22 13:06:51+00:00): Jaka historia? Jaki operator główny? Rozróżniasz firmę od poszczególnych elektrociepłowni wchodzących w jej skład?
Rozróżniasz firmę od jej właściciela?
Jakie jest źródło tych zmian, bo na pewno nie strona zakładu. Bo na stronie są informacje, które ja naniosłem.
Artek (2019-03-22 14:50:29+00:00): Strona https://pgeenergiaciepla.pl/spolki-i-oddzialy/elektrocieplownie/Kogeneracja
PGE jest właścicielem kogeneracji.
Historia: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200617506/history
maraf24 (2019-03-22 17:23:01+00:00): Proszę się zapoznać z  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 
i starać się trzymać tematu przy odpowiedziach.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
viloan (2019-03-21 17:48:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abakus_uploader (2019-03-21 23:30:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2019-03-22 11:12:50+00:00): Nazwę oficjalną można umieścić w official_name.
Nikt nazwy "PGE Energia Ciepła S.A. Oddział Elektrociepłownia w Kielcach" normalnie nie używa.
habsrobiul (2023-12-27 20:36:47+00:00): Assalamualaykum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu!
468597286, v8
When will this work start again?
adiatmad (2024-01-02 14:50:28+00:00): Wa'alaykumsalam Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuhu! 

Maybe you can start from this to find other tasks in MapRoulette

(https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges?challengeSearch=88.33282470703126%2C23.93608483743226%2C91.07940673828125%2C25.60936230526715&location=intersectingMapBounds&query=)
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Frans S (2019-03-22 11:57:57+00:00): Hi Eftapia. Thanks for mapping here. An request. Please pay more attention on correct mapping of buildings.  When you draw a triangle to map a round hut, please use the O key to circle it. Also, after mapping a rectangular building, pleasesquare it pressing the S key.
Thanks
viloan (2019-03-21 18:40:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Dimacn (2019-03-22 11:37:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не используйте описательные названия в теге name. В name заносим только официальные названия, а подробности отмечаются тегами. Пожалуйста исправьте все свои объекты. Подробнее:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
eggie (2019-03-21 20:23:07+00:00): Hi Ursus,

Thanks for your contribution. name= small information board is not a proper tag. Better  remove that tag.
The post is also connected to the road. Please move it to the right spot. left or right?

gr eggie
eggie (2019-03-21 20:27:47+00:00): dog=leashed  at the track is possible.
eggie (2019-03-21 20:59:28+00:00): disconnected post from road. removed name=
Gr eggie
ursus kirk (2019-03-21 21:10:30+00:00): Thanks. There is actually an old wooden gate there, which is 50 cm shorter then the total width of the opening. The sign stands posted on the righthand side of the gate. I'll make better photo's next time before I add stuff. But thanks for helping out.
eggie (2019-03-21 21:26:00+00:00): Hi... thanks for response. Gr eggie
viloan (2019-03-21 19:00:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-03-21 19:07:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Frans S (2019-03-25 15:49:25+00:00): Hi, Thanks for mapping. A remark
A small track in the middle of nowhere can never be a Primary Highway. Please update your skills with the WIKI OSM Highways in Africa
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2019-04-18 10:33:25+00:00): Thank you for helping on this project. A remark, You just mapped 1 building here, not squared and aligned.!. Despite that you declared this task as complete mapped, When you just want to stop mapping please  push on the button 'stop mapping'
There was still a lot of modifications to do.
andrewwiseman (2019-03-26 21:22:52+00:00): Thanks for mapping. You are adding a lot of things as tertiary, which means a road that connects major towns. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-19.85907/34.46571 These are probably better off as residential, unclassified or track.
Nate_M (2019-03-21 21:01:47+00:00): I saw that the building was labeled wrong and switch it to the jail and deleted the school tag it had with it. Was there something else I should have tagged?
pkoby (2019-03-21 21:09:04+00:00): No worries, but while it is a prison (amenity=prison), it is still a building, so it needs the building=yes tag. I guess you probably used the preset for prison?

When you're editing an object, if you scroll down to the bottom of the left sidebar, you can see the actual tags you're changing/adding, so you can get an idea of what's going on.

Also, if you haven't found it yet, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page has a lot of info about every tag. Apparently, amenity=prison is ideally a polygon of the land that the prison is taking up, not just a building, but I think it's fine this way too.
Nate_M (2019-03-21 21:26:52+00:00): Yes, I had used the preset. I’ll try to look next time to make sure it keeps the building tag if I change something. Thanks for the help and link.
jmapb (2019-03-27 21:26:28+00:00): Hi Airy14 and welcome to Openstreetmap!

I'm a mapper active in NYC. You've set "review_requested" on this changeset so I'm trying to review it. 

I have many comments if you'd like to hear them, but the big one is -- please make smaller changsets! It's very hard to review a changeset that spans from Houston to NYC, even if there are no changes in between. The QA tools available are not capable of processing such a large area.

Even just your changes within NYC are a lot. Especially as a new mapper, it's better to make only one or two changes per changeset. This will allow you to give better changeset descriptions to let others know why you're making the changes you are. And if something is wrong and needs to be addressed, it's much easier to fix.

Thanks, Jmapb
jmapb (2019-04-16 23:02:59+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset 69288832. Airy14, please let me know if you'd like to discuss. J
Glassman (2019-03-22 14:51:42+00:00): I think you can safely delete this restaurant. See https://seattle.eater.com/2019/1/7/18172622/blue-c-sushi-closure-seattle-washington-california

One tip, when you delete the restaurant, just delete the business tags but leave the address tags. I'm sure a new business will someday take over the address.
itineris (2019-03-22 08:01:33+00:00): Szia!
Az épülő R67-esnek ez a darabja tényleg kész, és halad rajta a forgalom? És a régi 67-esen is? Mindkettőn mindkét irányban? Vagy most hogyan kell elképzelni ezt a pár száz métert?
MyFudalli (2019-03-22 18:20:31+00:00): A régi 67-esen már nem megy a forgalom, az újon ideiglenesen 2 irányú
viloan (2019-03-21 21:31:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ent8r (2019-03-23 17:42:23+00:00): Hallo und herzlich Willkommen bei der OpenStreetMap!
Vielen Dank für deine erste Bearbeitung der Karte!
Ein kleiner Fehler ist dir allerdings unterlaufen. Nicht weiter schlimm, nur dass du es in der Zukunft besser machen kannst: Die Öffnungszeiten haben ein ganz spezielles (für Einsteiger bestimmt etwas kompliziertes) Format, damit auch Computer diese auswerten können. Für mehr Infors kannst du dir ja mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening hours durchlesen...
Ich kann den Wert gerne für dich korrrigieren, allerdings müsstest du mir dann auch sagen, von wann bis wann auf Juist Saison ist (Mai-Oktober)? Computer brauchen immer genaue Datumsangaben :)
Vielen Dank und bis bald,
ENT8R
Carlos Brys (2019-03-27 00:03:44+00:00): I have noticed that you made a change of many polygons that were labeled as landcover=trees to natural=wood in the changeset 68389191, and that affected the work of many editors of two countries.

The use of the landcover=trees label was discussed for a long time in the community of Argentina and Paraguay, and it was concluded that it is the best label to map the urban trees.

I am interested to know what motivated you to replace the labels of so many polygons and not leave any explanation in the comment of the change set.

Do you have superior OSM directives to make that change? Or did you do it for your personal interpretation?

I will appreciate a quick response.

A cordial greeting.
mcheck (2019-03-28 03:15:50+00:00): nooo! sigh! my personal interpretation, so i was fall in error, can i revert by myself or help to restore...?
Carlos Brys (2019-03-28 11:57:30+00:00): The global replacement of landcover=tree labels by natural=wood in thousands of ways, affected the work of years of editing in three countries carried out by a research project at the National University of Asunción in Paraguay.
It is necessary that you revert URGENTLY your changeset before other editors modify the ways and generate inconsistencies.
If you used the JOSM editor to modify the ways, you can use the revert changeset plugin to restore the previous state.
Please, act quickly.
A cordial greeting.
SomeoneElse (2019-03-29 11:18:04+00:00): @Carlos%20Brys To be fair to mcheck, "natural=wood" is the more normal way to tag these things everywhere else in the world - compare https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landcover=trees#overview with https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=wood#overview .  Can you point to where the discussion was?  I guess it wasn't on a public mailing list as https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ar/2019-February/thread.html and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-py/2019-February/thread.html seem pretty empty.
Carlos Brys (2019-03-30 17:16:48+00:00): @SomeoneElse :
You can read the discussion here:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61256
SomeoneElse (2019-03-30 18:12:00+00:00): Thanks, but that's not really a discussion about landcover=trees though, is it?  There's one post https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=685804#p685804 where you say what is "correct" (which doesn't really match usage elsewhere).  Also the idea that this is the first time that anyone in the world has mapped urban trees simply doesn't bear examination.  Picking the first 3 tree-heavy cities I could think of - https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=stockholm#map=16/59.3462/17.9992 https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/53.4289/-1.4661 https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=porto#map=18/41.15135/-8.61290 .
AgusQui (2019-03-31 03:45:54+00:00): @SomeoneElse is well known that natural=wood is more used than landcover=trees because the former is much older and is rendered in Carto and almost all applications, but the meaning of the latter is much clearer for use in urban areas.
hongze (2019-04-16 21:36:28+00:00): Indeed, please don't tag for the renderer. Instead fight for inclusion of landcover= into the default rendering style.
DD1GJ (2019-03-21 22:42:57+00:00): Original-Namen (wie auch im Web-Auftritt genannt) wieder hergestellt. Die Web-Adresse steht ordnungsgemäß in den Metadaten des Eintrages.
berms (2019-04-04 17:55:14+00:00): Hi mikkolukas,

What do you think about re-adding ref=180;O1 to way 342934220? This way users will understand which ref networks the road belongs to, as well as the intended direction of travel for each ref. Let me know what you think!

Thanks,
berms
mikkolukas (2019-04-04 19:57:52+00:00): But isn't it so already?

O1 is only relevant in northern direction.
In southers direction O1 is taking another route.

.. or have I misunderstood what you are asking?
berms (2019-04-04 21:00:47+00:00): Yes that makes sense to me. Perhaps we can add ref=180 to way 342934220, and then remove 180 from both ref:forward and ref:backward (deleting ref:forward tag completely). Thoughts?
mikkolukas (2019-04-04 21:19:32+00:00): That sounds like a fine idea to me, especially if more tools understand that better :)

Do you make the change or shall I? :)
berms (2019-04-04 22:06:54+00:00): Sounds like a plan! I can make the change. Thanks!
mikkolukas (2019-04-05 00:10:11+00:00): :)
Frans S (2019-03-22 09:59:43+00:00): Hello Sethsieger, Thanks for mapping. 
A remark.  This project is organized to map buildings, highways and waterways in a emergency situation and qualified as highly Urgent. Please restrict to mappings as such. We need to deliver  Maps with essential informations to the Aid organisations as soon as possible.
Thanks for understanding
Frans
gscholz (2019-03-27 05:37:03+00:00): Hi,
this changeset has created an error in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-74.08121&lat=2.72283&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

This changset also sticks a building to the middle of a road.
Can you please fix this?
Guido
Dimacn (2019-03-22 11:47:25+00:00): Пожалуйста удалите ваши фейковые парки. А также исправьте геометрию добавленных вами домов (рядом с "парками"), сейчас они не соответствуют реальности.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-21 23:52:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68392250 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some more Pokemon Sockpuppetry in Rochester.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2604
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-21 23:52:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68392250 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some more Pokemon Sockpuppetry in Rochester.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2604