piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Johnwhelan (2026-02-18 23:33:53+00:00): JOSM validation throws up a query highway=cycleway with foot and cycle designated.

Highway=path?
leewoof (2026-02-19 00:17:30+00:00): Thaba Trails is a mountain bike park, hence the designation. But I believe hikers are also allowed on the trails. However, I am no longer living in South Africa, so I am unable to verify this now.
Johnwhelan (2026-02-19 00:26:44+00:00): Thanks John
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
emersonveenstra (2022-08-10 11:38:44+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033104012 looks like it's going through someone's backyard, are you sure that's not supposed to be a private path?
emersonveenstra (2022-08-24 11:23:06+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125310768
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
NorthCrab (2022-12-25 19:12:35+00:00): Uważam że square to zły sposób na nazwanie ronda
syntex (2022-12-25 21:33:30+00:00): Ja tak nie uważam
Yunkers (2022-12-26 08:03:53+00:00): Ja też uważam jak NorthCrab - a wystarczy to oznaczyć jako skrzyżowanie, a nie plac, i wszystko jest cacy.
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
PT-53 (2022-09-02 06:26:01+00:00): Hallo Jakob48,
Du hast an diesem Wegabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817605811/history
das Merkmal
- highway=construction
abgeändert in
- highway=cycleway

Wenn der Wegabschnitt wieder zur Nutzung freigegeben ist, sollte noch das Merkmal
- construction=path
gelöscht werden.

Du hast den Wegabschnitt auf cycleway umgestellt. Ist dort denn zu Fuß gehen durch Verkehrszeichen # 239
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=239
ausdrücklich verboten.
Wenn dort kein entsprechendes Verkehrszeichen steht und somit Fußgänger und Radfahrer drüber dürfen, wäre Path die richtige Highway-Klassifikation.
Siehe Wiki:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an und auch die anderen Wege dort?

Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Jakob48 (2022-09-05 21:03:49+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

danke Dir für den Hinweis. Ich war an dem Tag dort unterwegs und habe mit vespucci getaggt. Das entsprechenden Wegstück habe ich wieder rausgenommen. Hatte dies nur vergessen.
Jakob48 (2022-09-05 21:12:12+00:00): Die anderen Wege habe ich auf hw=path umgestellt.

Gruß aus Radolfzell
Jakob48
PT-53 (2022-09-06 05:38:57+00:00): Hallo Jakob,
Danke für die Bereinigung und Rpckmeldung.
Gruß vom Fuße des Bussen
Enock4seth_repair (2022-08-19 20:30:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125125450 where the changeset comment is: delete ghost bookmakers in the woods, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Enock4seth/diary/396615
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-14 07:30:28+00:00): jak to dzikie przejście jest to crossing=no jest lepsze niż railway=crossing
syntex (2025-07-27 12:07:02+00:00): Chyba już ktoś i tak usunął
eggie (2022-08-10 12:32:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Dit lijkt me niet correct om dan motor_vehicle = no te gaan taggen. Er zijn toch meer verkeersdeelnemers dan de barndweerwagen alleen.
Wel kun je de breedte van de weg opgeven met width=?  Dan kan Live Op daar rekening meehouden.
Wel bord staat hier vooraan de weg?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-10 12:46:03+00:00): De situatie is hier onlangs aangepast. Ik heb tussen het fietspad en de hoofdrijbaan een paaltje gezet. bollard=fixed
Routeren doet het sowieso niet hier want het middenstuk van de kloosterpoort is door een mapper als pedestrian (voetgangers gebied) gemapt. Bebording ontbreekt.. Onduidelijke situatie. 

Hier wat leesvoer ter Leering ende Vermaeck

De breedte van de weg zou je nog kunnen uitzoeken. Denk dat van de andere kant bereikbaar zou moeten zijn voor een brandweerwagen.


Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-08-10 12:47:10+00:00): Laatste mutaie door een andere mapper
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124728634

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124728634

Gr eggie
complete_gth (2022-08-20 17:56:37+00:00): Moin,
ich habe gesehen, dass du viele Solarparks in DE mit den Daten von MaStR erstellt hast. Leider ist die Lizenz der Daten nicht mit OSM kompatibel ( https://www.marktstammdatenregister.de/MaStR/Startseite/Impressum ). Mehr dazu auch im Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74235 . Ob man die Daten jetzt so in OSM lassen kann oder ob man da was machen muss, kann ich nicht sagen. Zumindest auf das Hinzufügen von neuen Einträgen aus dem MaStR solltest du verzichten. 
VG complete_gth
Ana Luisa (2022-08-24 16:08:29+00:00): Hi,
besten Dank für die Info. Das war mir wirklich nicht bewusst. Werde das dann erstmal einstellen.
Austrianton (2022-08-12 17:20:56+00:00): Please keep edits local, to avoid filling the local history feeds.

Thanks and good future mapping
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
dcapillae (2022-08-10 12:00:31+00:00): Información adicional a partir de nota OSM número 3308031.
o_andras (2022-08-31 11:08:00+00:00): Hi! It seems you have created some duplicate features from this other earlier changeset of yours: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124731215

Just letting you know that I'm going to remove the ones I've noticed. It would be great if you could try to track other possible duplicates afterwards!

I'll comment again later after I remove the mentioned duplicates.

Thanks
o_andras (2022-08-31 11:31:30+00:00): Here it is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125607809
I may have found all of them, but can you check please?
Britzz (2022-09-02 17:18:24+00:00): Very sorry about that, my bad and a trouble with the app used. I carefully checked all the POIs cretad, i erased some of them, it's fixed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125708038).
Thank you for your attention and the alert.
o_andras (2022-09-12 12:57:52+00:00): No problem at all, thank you for your contributions! :)
Ydel (2023-04-17 15:06:11+00:00): Salut,
J'ai corrigé les attributs du busbar du poste source de Digne.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085332751
Bonne fin de journée
Rogoyski (2022-11-09 00:01:07+00:00): Patio w tym budynku jest przynajmniej na poziomie +0.5. Od zewnątrz widać jedną kondygnację więcej niż od wewnątrz. Dlatego w obrysie na EGiB nie ma obwarzanka i dlatego też zostawiłem tu wcześniej pełen obrys, jak w EGiB. Przypadek jest dyskusyjny, przyznaję, ale bliżej mi chyba do poprzedniej wersji.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 12:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124815695 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
mweper (2022-08-10 13:41:09+00:00): Por favor, no dupliques elementos si ya existen en el mapa. 
He revertido las vías duplicadas pero recuperé los nombres de cada calle para añadirlos en sus vías respectivas originales.
Véase: http://revert.osmz.ru/6952 y https://osm.org/changeset/124732672
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 12:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124815695 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
PT-53 (2022-08-11 10:49:59+00:00): Hallo ViniTeamFessler,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz auf dem folgenden,  gesamten Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155354144/history
die Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 50 kmh auf 100 kmh erhöht. Das war falsch.

Es reicht nicht aus, in die Straße einen Knoten mit dem Merkmal
- traffic_sign=city_limit
einzufügen, um verschiedenen Höchstgeschwindigkeiten innerorts und außerorts eintragen zu können. Die Straße muß dort am Ortsschild noch in 2 Abschnitte aufgetrennt werden. Danach kann die Höchstgeschwindigkeit entsprechend eingetragen werden.

Machst Du das noch oder soll ich das machen?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-08-28 08:19:17+00:00): Hallo ViniTeamFessler, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
ViniTeamFessler (2022-08-30 15:21:33+00:00): Hallo  PT-53,
vielen Dank für die Anmerkung. Leider bin ich in dem Tool noch nicht sehr fit und würde auf alle Fälle Ihre Unterstützung benötigen, um das richtig hier darzustellen.
Entschuldige auch für die verspätete Rückmeldung.
VG
PT-53 (2022-09-01 06:06:16+00:00): Hallo ViniTeamFessler, 
ich habe die Straße am Ortsschild aufgetrennt und die Höchstgeschwindigkeit innerorts von 100 auf 50 kmh herabgesetzt:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155354144/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090900439/history

Entspricht das jetzt den tatsächlichen Verhältnissen vor Ort?

Fragende Grüße
ViniTeamFessler (2022-09-02 05:55:19+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
ja so ist es jetzt richtig mit den Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen vor Ort. Vielen Dank für die Korrektur.
VG
Timmy_Tesseract (2022-09-17 00:55:54+00:00): Good day. Is it possible that you had a building filter activated when making the edits in this changeset? 

Ways 1085052876 and 1085052873 both were previously connected to a building=roof and were correctly tagged as covered=yes.
StrzeleckiDesert (2022-09-20 11:32:10+00:00): Hello, Timmy_Tesseract. Thanks for reaching out about this. I agree the service roads that are underneath the buildings should have a covered=yes tag. I have now added the tags back. Have a good day!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-12 11:56:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124815451 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism.
augxcgrwxo (2022-08-12 11:04:34+00:00): добрый день!
я хотел уточнить, вы насколько уверены, что корректно ставить для высоты тег maxheight (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxheight?uselang=ru) а не ele (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:ele) ?
evgeniyakz (2022-08-22 19:48:43+00:00): У нас наклонный город , и когда на велике катаешься ,то неудобно смотреть на рельефе там плохо видны перепады высот ,а так поглядел в проулках ,там можно увидеть примерную высоту ,чтоб избегать тягунов.
evgeniyakz (2022-08-22 19:49:58+00:00): Какой тег стоит в настройках по умолчанию тот и леплю ,может перевод не точный.
salgo60 (2022-08-10 13:00:16+00:00): This section is closed and someone skilled need to map it today we have a small chaos
_torsten_ (2023-01-12 06:28:24+00:00): Hallo OMME-OSM, wir hatten neulich erst die Diskussion in einem CS zu den Hausgärten. Als Ergebnis haben wir festgestellt, dass wir das großflächige Darstellen von Hausgärten nicht wollen. Das Wohngebiet (landuse=residential) stellt ja alles (auch Hausgärten) dar. Wenn du die Hausgärten wirklich darstellen willst, dann bitte viel kleinteiliger in den Bereich wo sie auch wirklich sind. Aber dann muss du das Mirkomapping auch pflegen.
Herzliche Grüße, Torsten.
gscholz (2022-10-14 08:23:31+00:00): Hi farhad_y,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=46.23557&lat=37.72771&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124731400

The boundary relation of "منطقه حفاظت شده سهند" is affected here.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
bxl-forever (2022-08-10 15:44:56+00:00): Hello,
Don’t forget the https:// part for the website.  Some apps report a broken link because you forgot it.
PaoloLombardi (2022-08-10 17:43:52+00:00): Buondì Pietro
Grazie mille dell'aggiornamento.
Quella variante è ora completata e percorribile?
Che quando andai io i lavori erano appena iniziati al primo tornante sopra Stalla Rossa.
In località Scarrone vige ancora il divieto? Grazie.
somix (2022-08-10 13:43:44+00:00): Здравствуйте! В name названия пишутся без сокращений.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-17 05:59:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits. Are you sure 9925228847 is a ford, rather than a culvert? If you don't know what they are on the ground or can't see clearly on the imagery then just leave it, even if the editor gives you a warning. Usually when maintained roads cross small streams it's a culvert, sometimes it's a bridge -- fords are quite rare for maintained roads. In the case of 9925228847 it's not only likely a culvert but also it seems to be about 150ft north of where the actual crossing is (NHD stream import), from comparing to lidar imagery
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-17 06:02:26+00:00): Whoops, meant to comment on changeset 124358022, but whatever
bxl-forever (2022-08-10 15:41:18+00:00): Hello,

Your changeset creates very uncommon tags.  I might be mistaken but it looks like you mechanically added bicycle=yes to lots of ways.

For instance, here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33127956

This cycleway was set as access=no because it is currently being rebuilt.  I haven’t checked recently but I’ll take your assumption for granted that it is open again.  In that case, just remove access=no and that will be fine.
In your change, you kept access=no and added bicycle=yes on top.  Technically, most routers will understand it but it’s really dirty to keep pile of nested access tags for nothing (highway=cycleway + access=no + bicycle=yes is quite pointless).

On this one, which is also being rebuilt, you added bicycle=yes but didn’t care to remove the construction key: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129161264
alix_geovelo (2022-08-10 15:56:16+00:00): Hi, 
For this part I assumed watching on Mapillary that the access= no was to tell it was not authorized for vehicules, except the bike (that why i put a bicycle yes on it) (as mapillary show the sign)
to be honest, i didn't see the tag construction, i was focused on this acess.
I'll check with a collegue tomorow and I think I'll revert the change, it'll be easier.
Best regards,
bxl-forever (2022-08-10 17:28:31+00:00): OK, thanks for replying.
Good idea if you have someone who can have a second look and clean up tags where appropriate.
bxl-forever (2022-08-10 15:33:43+00:00): Hello,

In Belgium, highway=path is automatically open to cyclists.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Belgium

I don’t know what "quality" is improved by forcing bicycle=yes on such a way.

Is there a reason to do this?  Does one specific software you use not know how to deal with highway=path?

Thanks in advance.
alix_geovelo (2022-08-10 15:46:07+00:00): Hi,

Sorry it"s a mistake from my side. I'll change it.
As you can see on Mapillary, it does'nt look like a path to me anayway , but i'm not sure what tag to use to be right : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.761567599972&lng=4.2796478999722&z=17&pKey=5829117717157102&focus=photo&x=0.6078178815894879&y=0.5876338237066496&zoom=1.086372822733949

Thanks for the details, 
Best regards
Emilius123 (2022-08-10 14:17:36+00:00): Mama said, she's proud of me
SekeRob (2022-08-10 15:11:42+00:00): Mama must have told you that a long time ago, lest she's with you on vacation. ;P)

PS Doing this in a single half globe covering edit is sort of 'Not Done'. And mail boxes are patient ;o)

ciao
user_11932834 (2022-08-11 09:27:01+00:00): why does it span half of the world though
SekeRob (2022-08-11 18:24:52+00:00): Because OSM draws a 'bound box' from the most furthest apart nodes edited, here Canada, Roumania and somewhere in Africa, Solletea. Every mapper in that bound box gets to see these edits in their local edit history regardless if there was an edit in their regular mapping area. FOR DAYS. 

This wiki explains it much better than I can on Geographical area, keedp it local: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Mama may be proud, but then mamas are hardly unbiased towards sons.
Emilius123 (2022-08-11 20:03:07+00:00): Y'all please have mercy, I did this on my 8.hour train ride, I was just bored.
skquinn (2022-08-19 14:05:28+00:00): Just a note, I have been tagging both a shop=chemist (on the building) and an amenity=pharmacy (on a separate node) for most Walgreens, CVS, etc locations, as frequently they are both and have different opening_hours (and often different phone numbers).
martien-176 (2022-08-10 15:51:25+00:00): I randomly check mappings and saw these.

Well done, buildings look good: properly squared and traced. 

One thing though: you deleted mappings from other mappers that you found probably incorrect. In general, within OSM, that is only allowed if a feature is non-existant (anymore). If that is not the case it will be seen as "inappropriate".

In such situation it is better to fix and/or move the feature.

Thanks and regards, Martien, global validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124734422
Alouette955 (2023-04-09 20:01:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Les parcours Boomerang à Sainte-Thérèse sont des parcours de marche et de course à pied. L'attribut network=lcn dans cette relation est réservé aux parcours cyclistes et ne devrait pas y apparaître.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-08-12 10:47:53+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Il tag service=driveway è usato solo per strade di servizio che conducono a una singola proprietà e non è questo il caso. Inoltre, il tag maxspeed deve essere usato solo in presenza dell'apposito cartello. Ciao, Andrea
dankarran (2024-04-18 21:28:28+00:00): Hi mentor,

Is the split between Lhen Road and Coast Road at an exact point, or just a rough estimate of where it changes? 

The Land Registry transactions for Ballacregga list its street name as Lhen Road, so I wonder if perhaps the split might actually be at the Thurot Cottage Road junction (also coincidentally where the IM7 3 and IM7 4 postcode sectors meet).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150195075
dankarran (2024-04-18 21:47:54+00:00): I think my addition of Coast Road as the street name on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1126023532 was just based on whatever was nearby at the time... I can't find another reference for it in planning applications or land transactions datasets datasets.
Frans S (2022-09-04 10:09:00+00:00): Hello Angelica 
I want you to show you the way you mapped buildings, very often far oversized and clustered. It cost so much time to correct that. In the same time you could map them accurate.
Please take a look on this web page to see what a mess you produced.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125766077
Please stop mapping or improve your mapping skills and map accurate
Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-17 21:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125036550 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6256
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-17 21:37:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125036550 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6256
arvdk (2023-05-03 12:54:02+00:00): Bron voor de conditional? Op luchtfoto's van een paar dagen geleden zie ik auto's rijden en geparkeerd staan bij de winkels..
eggie (2023-05-03 13:35:20+00:00): Die bron was iemand van verkeerszaken in Woerden die een 'mislukte' poging had gedaan om de hele reconstructie in te tekenen. A67 A67 heeft ondertussen ook iets aangepast. Zet jij het weer open?

Groet..
eggie
eggie (2023-05-03 13:48:27+00:00): Huidige situatie...

Ik heb het al aangepast.. het staat weer ooen, maar alles komt hier anders terug. Dus zal ook weer tijdelijk zijn. 

https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.3%2C0.5&datemin=03-05-2022&loc=52.08620%2C4.902896%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2023-04-30&acqid=20230430_104229_PNEO-04_1_1&sensor=Pleiades-NEO

Groet
eggie
arvdk (2023-05-03 14:00:49+00:00): Top. Ja, zo blijven we bezig :) Groetjes, Arjan
user_14250389 (2022-08-15 08:31:59+00:00): YouBike 微笑單車的品牌資料已在變更集 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124916436 中被追加，感謝您對開放街圖的貢獻！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124736124
Branko Kokanovic (2022-08-12 19:28:56+00:00): Molim te pazi kada mapiras oko admin boundaryja, gledaj da ne slepljujes ostale stvari sa granicama, one treba da budu odvojene od ostatka. Ispravio sam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124831418, nije problem, nego ako se setis da pripazis!:)
Sabering (2022-08-14 11:30:10+00:00): aha hvala Branko!
user_5359 (2022-08-13 09:53:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/895918780. what is the meaning of the tag d = 1?
marczoutendijk (2022-08-17 20:09:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/yayayavsesh/blocks
user_5359 (2022-08-13 09:56:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/39084762. what is the meaning of the tag d1 = 1?

Please write better changeset comment!
marczoutendijk (2022-08-17 20:09:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/yayayavsesh/blocks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-17 21:37:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125036550 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6256
Physeters (2022-08-11 06:45:00+00:00): *out
felipeeugenio (2022-08-10 16:49:39+00:00): Hola. La calle ya existe. no hay necesidad de agregar otra encima.
saludos
ivanbranco (2022-08-10 19:20:34+00:00): Ciao Davide,

ricordati solo le prossime che la sintassi per il tag wikimedia commons è "wikimedia_commons=File:Postguide-Alpe Campo.jpg" e non "wikimedia_commons=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Postguide-Alpe_Campo.jpg"

Buon mapping :)
-io- (2022-08-11 03:52:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем удалили 2 квартала?
CarolusMagnus (2022-08-13 10:19:15+00:00): Здравствуйте, объясните, пожалуйста:
а) удаление кварталов,
б) источник новых кварталов.
mavl (2022-08-27 17:08:42+00:00): Здравствуйте, Мар Учва.  
Этот пакет правок отменён. Постарайтесь редактировать карту так, чтобы она отражала реальное состояние местности.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным