piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2020-03-30 08:19:41+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier das Tag 'dpg=yes' hinzugefügt - das sieht nach einem Tippfehler aus.
pdxrider (2020-04-06 05:44:23+00:00): Just letting you know that the 7-11 gas station you mapped is actually a truck in the Maxar imagery and there's no such gas station at the site, so I removed it.
eggie (2020-03-28 20:12:11+00:00): Hier idem.. Paadje is prima, maar water op landuse "moet" anders. 
Eggie
skfd (2020-03-30 16:18:34+00:00): Привет! footway подразумевает что там можно проехать великом. bicycle=yes означает "закон явно разрешает тут ездить", но ето не так, не нужно ето проставлять.
Li-H (2020-04-13 18:48:11+00:00): Ок, понял, спасибо.
A67-A67 (2020-03-29 11:52:32+00:00): Hallo BAGgeraar,
Deze wegen waren niet als autosnelweg getagd, maar als 'verbindingsweg tussen een autosnelweg en een lagere weg' (motorway_link). 

Aan de 'x' in 'x_link' zie niet niet wat voor wegtype het wegdeel zelf is, maar wat het hoogste wegtype van is van de twee wegen die deze weg verbindt. In dit geval is dat dus motorway-primary, dus motorway_link.
luiswoo (2020-03-29 06:31:03+00:00): ну да, получился один большой жилой дом, а должно быть землепользование https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
luiswoo (2020-03-29 06:34:09+00:00): В чудо онлайн-редакторе, это указывается как «Жилая территория»
Gazer75 (2020-07-22 13:51:18+00:00): Please do not split roads at toll gantries, The tagging of direction=forward or backward is the way to do these. Split roads are only were there is a physical barrier/kerb.
mueschel (2020-03-30 08:20:35+00:00): Hi,
what does 'capacity:ev' mean? This tag doesn't exist in any other place.

Jan
T99 (2020-03-30 08:29:48+00:00): It's the partial capacity of a parking lot assigned to electric vehicles. Sorry I didn't record the entire capacity of the whole parking lot yet.

There are a few other spots like this with identical signs. However, they are all equipped with an EV charging apparatus. This one isn't. It could be work in progress. I'll review shortly.
mueschel (2020-03-30 08:34:59+00:00): Thanks for explaining!
We don't yet have an approved tag for electric cars, but 'ev' is not used either as far as I can tell.
We do have some 'capacity:electric' on parking lots.
And we have some 'electric_car' tags, which could be used in 'capacity:electric_car'.
What do you think? I'd prefer to have things at least consistent until we have an approved tagging scheme.
T99 (2020-03-30 08:35:49+00:00): One thing to note about this complex is that everything is slightly askew with respect to the boulevard. Just a couple of degrees.
T99 (2020-03-30 08:38:20+00:00): Thanks, I'll use "'capacity:electric" on the next update. Today I found 2 new charging stations (total 4) and I will map them shortly.
Volker Fröhlich (2020-03-28 19:52:25+00:00): Of course the source should read "survey;basemap.at Orthofoto"!
*abq* (2020-12-13 08:51:45+00:00): Wenn hier kein Baum steht, solltest du auch keinen eintragen. Das ist die on-the-ground-Regel.
Viele Grüße, Reiner
MapMakerGal (2020-03-28 20:05:09+00:00): Non fai falla que poña dous aldeas "neste caso Eirexe", non se deben duplicar nomes, con un chega.

Grazas.
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-05 23:31:50+00:00): Do not add fictitious features such as:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785419440

This changeset has been reverted in part or whole.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-03-28 21:56:43+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/50 for details.
Glassman (2020-03-29 13:57:40+00:00): Tip: Instead of removing the existing house, just update the geometry to save the history and also in this case the address. Which I noticed was wrong. I've added the correct address back to your newer bldg outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82763266
eggie (2020-03-29 06:39:02+00:00): Beste Leo.. Nu lopen er twee kruisende paden zonder enige verbinding over elkaar heen. Misschien dat je met Go Map op een tablet werkt en heb je geen enkel overzicht. Ik haal even één pad weg, want het geeft anders foutmeldingen. In dit geval de highway=track.. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-29 06:40:52+00:00): Mijn edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=82770085
datendelphin (2020-03-29 07:43:49+00:00): Hallo Redfighter. Willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe mir deine ersten paar Änderungen angeschaut. Sieht gut aus, ausser hier habe ich ein paar Vorschläge. Sei zurückhaltend mit dem name tag. Die Garage im Süden heisst ziemlich sicher nicht Toyota. Den Brand hast du ja bereits eingetragen, der Name wäre vermutlich Schmid: https://garage.toyota.ch/de/sins-auto-schmid-sins-ag (Website könnte man überigens auch eintragen) dann die Karten, Dorfkarte ist eine Beschreibung. Weglassen. Oder in den description tag. Im name tag nur Namen. Eine Ludothek ist amenity=toy_library. Und mit der Löschung vom Wanderwegweiser am Bahnhof Sins bin ich nicht einverstanden. Würde mich wundern wenn es dort keinen Wegweiser mehr gibt. Das waren jetzt etwas viele Punkte, bitte lasse dich nicht entmutigen. Ich habe auch deine anderen Änderungen angeschaut und die waren alle super. Viel Spass und beste Grüsse, Michael.
Duja (2020-08-13 09:07:21+00:00): Peđa, ajd leba ti apgrejduj taj iD 2.5.1 na nešto modernije (poslednji je 2.18.x). Napravio si gomilu highway=road, što ne bi smelo da postoji. Noviji iD ti ne bi ni dao da to snimiš. Znam da si ga kastomizovao, ali pravi više štete nego koristi.
Pedja (2020-08-13 22:16:34+00:00): Što ne sme da postoji highway=road?

U dokumetnaciji opstoji i neam nikakvih napomena da ne treba da se koristi. Ja to koristim kada ucrtavam put za koji nije očigledno šta je i kakav je, tj. kao unknown road.

Kako drugačije to da ucrtavam?
Duja (2020-08-14 07:09:32+00:00): Wiki prilično jasno kaže da ne treba da se koristi, osim eventualno privremeno:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Droad
Ti naši planinski putevi nemaju uvek jasnu klasifikaciju čak i da si prošao njima. Ja stavljam highway=residential (+surface=unpaved) kad vodi do kakvih kuća, highway=unknown kad je "glavniji" put ka nekom zaseoku, a highway=track kad je baš šumski ili poljski. Kažem, sve je to relativno, ali highway=road je verovatno najgora opcija.
Pedja (2020-08-14 11:30:00+00:00): "This tag should only be used temporarily until the road/way/etc. has been properly surveyed. Do not use this tag when the type of road/etc. is known. As soon the road type is known, use one of the more specific values of highway=*. "

Ja ga upravo koristim ovako kako je navedeno jer tako na mapi postoji ucrtano da postoji nekakav put, a kakav je, to može naknadno da se ucrta kada se utvrdi.

Da pretpostavljam kakvi su putevi ne smem, pogotovo što često ucrtavam puteve koji su u veoma ruralnom području i nije sigurno ni u kakvom su stanju.

Gledao sam da li postoji neki drugi način da označim put ali nisam našao ništa prikladno. Sve ostalo bi dalo predstavu o putu koja može da bude ozbiljno netačna i da navede nekoga da krene tim putem a onda da se ispostavi da je informacija na mapi pogrešna i da uđe u neki ozbiljan problem (zaglavi se negde - na primer).

Zašto bi to nekom smetalo, nemam pojma.
Duja (2020-08-14 11:46:17+00:00): Pa *nijedan* tip taga ne govori ništa o kvalitetu puta - ni residential, ni unclassified, pa čak ni track. Ako želiš biti oprezan, ti stavi track, mada to nije baš korektno ako očito vodi do kuća. No highway=road ne pomaže ni korisnicima (jer se uglavnom ne rutira ni renderuje) ni drugim maperima (koji će opet morati da odluče gde da ga klasifikuju makar i prepešačili njime). 
Ne vidim što se toliko ograđuješ, ako se bojiš da predstava može biti "ozbiljno netačna" nemoj ni mapirati. Ali ja kao korisnik više volim u nepoznatom kraju da imam gustu mrežu puteva sa 5% grešaka, nego praznu mapu.
Pedja (2020-08-14 12:14:37+00:00): Главни део посла је уцртати трасу пута. И ја то радим, јер то могу да урадим са довољним нивоом тачности. Ако класификацију не могу да урадим, онда ставим да је пут некласификован. Тако неко други, ко има више података може да настави и да само дода класификацију.

Моје је мишљење да је боље да постоји уцртана траса пута чак и некласификована него да је уопште нема. Мени ја за моје потребе то углавном довољно, јер ми је, кад сам на терену, често више него довољно да знам да пут постоји.

Не слажем се да то није корисно, јер ем се зна да пут постоји и која му је траса ем се зна да није познато какав је пут, што оном ко то користи итекако може да значи да зна да свашта може да очекује.

Не знам шта други мисле о томе, али ако је званичан став да се не уцртавају некласификовани путеви онда ћу престати да уцртавам. Мени није проблем да трасе путева уцртавам у другу мапу коју ћу да користим за своје потребе, а ОСМ нек остане празан.

То ће вероватно значити и да нећу моћи да уцртавам ни бицијклситичке и планинарске руте, јер нећу имати подлогу, ал шта можемо, ако се не сме, не сме се.

Треба ли да се вратим и побришем све што сам досад уцртао некласификоване путеве?
Duja (2020-08-14 12:17:36+00:00): Radi kako hoćeš, odustajem.
Alecs01 (2020-03-28 21:21:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dprimary inoltre, le rotatorie non si mappano in quel modo con un punto
Tomas Straupis (2020-03-29 05:57:55+00:00): tourism=information is for places where you can actually (on the ground/spot) find information for tourists: boards, directions etc. It is not a way to "say" something to potential tourists.
Jay May (2020-03-30 07:55:08+00:00): O.K. Actually my aim is for other OSM users not to map again this bridge (btw really a pity it doesn't exist anymore). What other solution would you suggest?
Tomas Straupis (2020-03-30 08:35:35+00:00): I've updated tags do disused: so it will be visible to other mappers with JOSM.
Tomas Straupis (2020-03-30 08:36:54+00:00): Sorry, to demolished:, not disused:
Jay May (2020-03-30 11:57:01+00:00): Cool, thanks
PT-53 (2020-03-29 06:56:38+00:00): Hallo Andi,Du hast leider erneut falsche Änderungen vorgenommen. Ich habe daher diesen Änderungssatz vollständig zurückgesetzt.
PT-53 (2020-03-29 07:20:19+00:00): Hallo Andi,
da war ich etwas vorschnell. Ich habe mir das nochmal angesehen und meinen Revert zurückgenommen.
Ich halte aber place=suburb für die Gewerbegebiet zu groß  und place= 	neighbourhood  oder quarter für passender.
Sorry
Li-H (2020-03-30 15:31:13+00:00): Кто-то может помочь мне вернуть этот объект на место?
По заметке и по глупости удалил его не разобравшись, а потом посмотрел на сайт и понял что неверно. А восстановить не получается - промучился пару дней и полтачем и Josm-ом - не смог.
Буду рад если мне помогут восстановить этот объект наместо.
mike140 (2020-04-02 20:43:57+00:00): правку откатил - объект восстановлен
Leo Slager (2020-03-29 00:14:53+00:00): Dag vvad,
service=emergency_access hoort niet op een slagboom te staan.
Het geeft de functie weer van een highway=service.
Jano van de VR Ijsselland had de slagboom reeds correct gemapt.
Leo Slager (2020-03-29 00:54:11+00:00): Zo te zien heb je in het verleden nooit een welkomstbericht gehad.
Wellicht ook ben je niet op de hoogte van het bestaan van een wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Hoofdpagina
Daar kun je opzoeken hoe we zaken op de kaart zetten en wat dan de juiste tags zijn die je moet toevoegen.
user_5359 (2020-03-29 04:44:53+00:00): Hello! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 19:21:21+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?  Надеюсь в преть Ваши правки будут менее глобальными. Согласовывайте импорт, перетегирование и удаление тегов с местным сообществом. В противном случае будет откачено
Спасибо за понимание.
fims7 (2020-05-20 19:36:11+00:00):  ответил тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83206268#map=4/56.94/70.08
imaginecarilo (2020-05-24 15:26:24+00:00): https://www.cariloimagine.com
imaginecarilo (2020-05-24 15:25:46+00:00): https://valerialapergola.com.ar/
imaginecarilo (2020-05-24 15:24:35+00:00): https://www.cariloimagine.com
fgouget (2020-05-16 08:54:40+00:00): Bonjour,

La voie "Rue de Bar Al Lan" a :
  maxspeed=aed Barr al Lann
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100669986/history

Il y a probablement eu un problème lors de la sélection du champ à modifier...
gscholz (2020-04-17 04:33:07+00:00): Hi MarlisN,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.14604&lat=-25.39229&zoom=14&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?

Guido
imaginecarilo (2020-05-24 15:23:38+00:00): Morros de pacífico es un complejo de cabañas frente al mar, ubicado estrategicamente en Punta de Lobos, Pichilemu, Chile.
Dentro del centro comercial LA QUILLA, ofrece alojamiento para 2, 4, 8 y 12 personas, con todos los servicios y comodidades.
Disfrute de sus vacaciones, fines de semana, con amigos o familia.
<a href=”https://morrosdelpacifico.cl”>cabañas arriendo pichilemu</a>
imaginecarilo (2020-05-24 15:24:01+00:00): https://morrosdelpacifico.cl/
seewäldler (2020-03-29 14:12:50+00:00): Hallo Seetroll
hier hast du way 626692312 und way 338456571 wahrscheinlich nach alten Luftbildern verschoben. So wie sie waren, waren sie schon richtig, nach mehreren GPS-traces ausgerichtet dem tatsächlichen Verlauf nach der Fertigstellung entsprechend. Richtest du das wieder richtig?
Seetroll (2020-04-03 19:54:51+00:00): Hallo Seewälder,
den Weg 626692312 hatte ich gar nicht angefasst gehabt (die Chronikanzeige im JOSM zeigt dich am 19.09.2019 als zuletzt "angefassten" Kontakt damit.
Den Weg 338456571 bin im mit meinem etrex30 bei klarem Wetter per Fahrrad gefahren und habe dementsprechend die Korrekturen durchgeführt. Du kannst natürlich gerne den Wegeverlauf wieder ändern.

Grüße
     Seetroll
Seetroll (2020-04-03 20:03:04+00:00): Hallo Seewäldler,
ich habe die dazugehörige GPX-Datei zum Weg 338456571 <Fischbach-Immenstaad.gpx> Fahrrad/Fußweg Fischbach->Immenstaad in meinem Account hinterlegt
seewäldler (2020-04-05 19:09:02+00:00): Hallo Seetroll
den Weg 626692312 als solches hattest du zwar nicht angefasst, jedoch die Punkte 6807434794, 6807434795, 6807434796,... über die er läuft, und diese genau auf den Wegeverlauf des veralteten Luftbildes zurückverschoben. Jetzt sieht es dort so aus wie hier https://www2.pic-upload.de/img/36684276/kreuzung.jpg zu sehen, mit weitem Schwenk nach Westen.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-03-06 10:40:02+00:00): Hey guy! You have added a wrong tag! It is node/7341608271
The tag china_class means a administrative district!
So I guess your mean is "date=2020-03-28"

Maybe my guess is not exactly so you can modify it twice.
I'm sorry that I only can message you with English because I don't know German

I have fixed it.
LightSpirit (2021-03-06 18:39:20+00:00): You are right. It is my mistake. I've changed it to the TAG "check_date". Best regards Oliver
pio2_122 (2020-03-29 10:20:50+00:00): Zmieniłeś adresy na niezgodne z danymi z SIP gminy.
Są to aktualne dane bezpośrednio z terenu, czy użyłeś innego źródła (wg mnie SIP gminy jest najbardziej wiarygodnym źródłem...)?
Zmianowy (2020-07-14 11:29:12+00:00): Z terenu https://polska-org.pl/8582034,foto.html?idEntity=8582024
pio2_122 (2020-07-14 11:36:40+00:00): Rozumiem.
Zgłoszę to poprzez SIP gminy; zobaczymy co odpowiedzą...
highflyer74 (2020-03-29 10:44:57+00:00): Hello planesandstuff and welcome to OSM!

I am writing this in English as you have edited in Canada and the Canadian community needs to be able to read this as well (ich spreche auch deutsch, aber wenn Du international mappst, nutze bitte englische Kommentare im Changeset).

I stumbled across this edit as you have added another airport to the existing airport. Before editing, please check all objects if some object already carries the main tag. In this case it is this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1042031333.

Please do some more reading into how OSM works. I will send you some useful links via PM.

I have fixed the double mapping in the meantime. Thank you!
planesandstuff (2020-03-29 12:33:55+00:00): Thank you for the info and the fix!

Is there a preference for when to use a node for an airport and when to map the airport area?
highflyer74 (2020-03-29 14:01:45+00:00): I don't know if there is a Canadian preference, the wiki allows it to be added both nodes and ways (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aeroways)
eggie (2020-03-29 06:25:41+00:00): Dag Dave.. De strook waar je loopt sluit hier helemaal aan het fietspad. 
Je kunt in dit geval dan beter de tagging van het voetpad opnemen in het fietspad met sidewalk=right
Dan routeert het ook beter. Je kunt nu immers niet oversteken naar dat voetpad komende van uit het pad langs de flat. 
Kijk je nog even? 
MVG,
Eggie
ortho_is_hot (2020-03-28 23:55:02+00:00): Hi, from what source are these dates? From what I've seen, the underpass opened today and partly yesterday. I will be surveying this today unless there has been a modification to the dates?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82766631
ortho_is_hot (2020-03-29 00:35:04+00:00): Apologies, I just noticed the updated date due to the weather issues
abrensch (2020-03-29 07:49:25+00:00): Hallo  j1scad,

glaube hier hat Du ein Loch in die St 2132 gemacht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7341716805

Schaust Du mal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
j1scad (2020-03-29 19:01:54+00:00): Ups, korrigiert. Danke
Martin868 (2020-05-04 22:02:27+00:00): Je viens de corrige les dommages important à la région ValMorin ValDavid que ce changement a causé.
b-jazz (2022-04-18 15:46:49+00:00): Many of the greens here are mapped as being surrounded by a ring of "rough", but I've never seen a golf course that has their greens ringer by rough grass. Are you sure that isn't fringe grass, more along the quality of "fairway" grass? If so, it should be marked as fairway and not rough.
DENelson83 (2020-03-30 02:23:51+00:00): I noticed that you just added another post office in Ontario.  If you have not seen this yet, may I interest you in it?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada_Post
DannyMcD (2020-04-01 02:34:47+00:00): That seems like an interesting project.  Thanks for letting me know.  I'm not entirely sure how I could contribute though - could you tell me more?
DENelson83 (2020-04-01 02:46:04+00:00): We always appreciate additional ground surveys, and you can use the spreadsheets linked on that wiki page to guide such a survey.

However, given the current COVID-19 pandemic, you may want to stay in your home community for now.
habi (2021-07-20 10:56:43+00:00): Ciao melrosatortolano
In this changeset you've added several buildings with `name=building`, `landuse=residential`, which is - in my opinion - completely wrong.
I changed all the affected buildings to `building=residential` in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108312019
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
user_5359 (2020-03-29 06:25:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the new highway with the existing highways.
user_5359 (2020-03-29 06:09:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=playground if you has the tag leisure=playground (for example).
Allison P (2020-03-29 23:38:05+00:00): Is this a path connecting a residential neighbourhood to a main road? I imagine it should be tagged access=private, not access=no. If it's for emergency services, access=emergency would be more appropriate. access=no makes sense for places such as Area 51 but it feels too strong for this scenario.
muralito (2020-03-29 14:14:29+00:00): Hola.

Los limites son los limites, pero no tienen nombre, no se llaman asi, por tanto eso no va en "name". Si queres se puede poner en la etiqueta "description"
muralito (2020-03-29 14:16:03+00:00): Por ejemplo. esta calle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304736375 no se llama como le pusiste de nombre.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-12 20:43:49+00:00): Is there a reason you added what should be roadways as golf cartpaths?

This ultimately damaged the map and is considered vandalism.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:10:25+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Warin61 (2020-10-24 23:53:56+00:00): Hi,

The 'rubbish imported data' at least indicates that there is something here and about where it is. The alternative is a blank map with the notation 'there be dragons'. 

In some decades the present gps data too could be regarded as 'rubbish'. We each contribute, adding and improving... please continue to contribute, but don't publicly degenerate others contributions no matter how you feel about it. Ok?
mos6510 (2020-10-25 22:20:50+00:00): Unfortunately the comment "there is something there" is actually a problem - I've found examples where I thought I could get through an area because there was a road on the map, when in fact there wasn't. Boro Road near Tarago NSW was historically one such example. I drove a few kilometres into that road only to find that it abruptly stopped at a fence and thick trees. The OSM data indicated that the road continued on. Imported data often has problems. I see it all the time as I actually go out and explore these places. The imported data *was* rubbish in this case. That's not a reflection on you - it's a reflection on the source data, so please don't take it personally. Ok?
aharvey (2020-10-26 11:20:23+00:00): I do think we place too much trust in this "imported" government data. OSM has always been from the start first and foremost from field surveys, supplemented by imagery. So while generally I'd say we shouldn't just blindly track LPI data to provide a base data where no existed prior, if it's already been done, then I think let's try and focus our efforts on moving forward. So be bold in fixing issues, especially if it's originally from data without a survey.
aharvey (2020-10-26 11:23:27+00:00): Yeah and I agree with mos6510 that the changeset comment is just saying the imported data is rubbish, not the person doing the import or process of importing, so don't see this as publicly degrading the contribution (which is the act of importing/tracing existing datasets).
marczoutendijk (2021-11-30 15:29:08+00:00): Hello Astro Visual,
Don't use the name=* tag to describe what something is.
natural=water + water=pond is enough.
name=Pond is redundant. Unless of course this pond really has the name "Pond".
See here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
Warin61 (2020-10-25 00:20:29+00:00): Some possible errors.. from the LPI base map... 

The present track 'Hicks Road' (way 785502339) looks to be Ferndale Road at the western end. I don't see a 'Hicks Road' on the LPI base Map. 

The present unclassified  'Ferndale Road' (way 785502338) looks to be a track and unnamed.
mos6510 (2020-10-25 21:47:11+00:00): G'day,
I drove those tracks and many of them are sign posted. I might have taken a picture of the signs (I can check), but I certainly do not just make the names up!
All of my mapping has been done by "survey", and I often find errors in the LPI and other database imports. I'm pretty sure this is one!