piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk (2021-10-12 15:35:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5380

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
MCDA (2021-10-12 17:44:26+00:00): Hi Marc, can you revert these change-sets? This user is ignoring previous attempts to communicate and make things right and these deleted/broken relations are going to play havoc with downstream users who rely on OSM data.
user_177389 (2021-10-12 19:51:13+00:00): Hello, I have reverted changesets #112416478 and #112422691 (couldn't wait). But there are other changesets where islands are now duplicated. Someone should take a deeper look at these.

Best regards,
Mario
marczoutendijk (2021-10-12 19:54:48+00:00): After my block, this user has not been active again. I'm waiting for their reply.
impey (2021-10-13 15:53:37+00:00): I’m not sure what the issue is here; I am simply updating the island names are per original OSNI Historical Maps 1/2/3 Editions as available from PRONI website publicly available to all. Some of the islands had lines around them however I had to create areas along the same lines in order to give the island its proper name.
marczoutendijk (2021-10-13 19:18:32+00:00): impey, why did you have to "create" areas to give the island its proper name? If you want to change a name why do you have to take such a step?
Are you aware of the complex multipolygons and relations in use here?
So, before doing any more edits, please discuss this with the other users and try to understand what they have been trying to achieve here.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
MCDA (2021-10-13 20:31:32+00:00): 1) The PRONI Historical Maps are copyrighted (see the agreement that must be accepted before use - https://imgur.com/tgHPpPJ ) and therefore CAN NOT be used to source information.
2) The Islands DO have a name, but are tagged within the relation.  If you do not understand how relations work, please ask someone and learn how to work with them.  There are some really good how-to videos on YouTube which show how townlands are made up. See - https://www.openstreetmap.ie/projects/townlands/
3) It is good practice to read and respond to previous changeset comments, like the ones other members have been asking regarding issues going back months now.  I asked you about your source of the street names in Ederney in May and you have ignored me.  Copying from Google Maps/StreetView or PRONI/LPS/OSNI is not allowed.  Copyright infringement is a serious issue and could destroy the hard earned work a lot of us have put in to creating an open map.
4) A change-set comment of "Update" is basically useless!!  Comments should be as detailed as possible and INCLUDE the source of the information (so we don't have to ask you!) 
5) There are a set of common practices regarding naming in OSM.  For example, we don't use abbreviations like St, Rd or Ave and spell it out completely.  The same is true for names of churches, ie Saint Patrick's.  We also tag the religion, so don't include it in the name, which is why NoelB is asking you why you are adding (RC) to the names of churches in your "updates".
marczoutendijk (2021-10-14 09:55:47+00:00): impey, do you understand whats going on here?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
puchaczowsky (2023-04-05 10:11:23+00:00): czemu zmieniłeś kategorię drogi na odcinku Siciny - Góra na "unclassified"? 

droga jednak trochę miejscowości łączy, a poza tym mamy teraz niekonsekwencję na granicy miasta Góra: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1647191996
Marek_P (2023-04-05 10:21:55+00:00): Zrobiłem to ze względu na samą drogę. Wg wiki 
"przyjęto, ze gdy droga jest dwupasmowa (ma wyznaczony środek jezdni) lub gdy pozwala swobodnie wyminąć się dwu pojazdom (bez zwalniania poniżej dopuszczalnej na drodze prędkości) jest highway=tertiary. Reszta to highway=unclassified lub niższe."

Może obecnie droga została wyremontowana i poszerzona, ale jak ja nią jechałem, żeby minęły się dwa samochody, trzeba było zjechać na pobocze.
Supaplex (2021-10-13 02:30:39+00:00): 請問為何要移除中正區的行政邊界標籤呢?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112417164
kubahahaha (2021-10-12 13:01:51+00:00): https://chelm.pttk.pl/index.php/trasy/trasy-piesze
maraf24 (2021-10-12 15:32:48+00:00): Jak sobie przypominam dawną dyskusję na forum, to PTTK niespecjalnie się zgadzało na używanie ich danych w OSM.
kubahahaha (2021-10-13 12:07:45+00:00): Ja stąd wziąłem tylko nazwę szlaku, wydawało mi się, że takie coś jest w dozwolonym użytku
maraf24 (2021-10-13 18:21:52+00:00): Raczej nie tylko, bo Szlak Rezerwatór Przyrody został tutaj dopiero utworzony. Została więc pobrana informacja o jego istnieniu, miejscu istnienia, danych, kolorze, dystansie.
Nb. dozwolony użytek nie stosuje się do OSM.
eggie (2021-10-12 15:32:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jeka p (2021-10-12 19:06:09+00:00): Hallo!
wieso alle Eigenschaften der Straße gelöscht und als Service getagged?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29456621/history
Wie ich den Weg kenne, ist nur der Teil bei der Gärtnerei Alex highway=service
SG
Jeka
mcliquid (2021-10-12 20:08:56+00:00): Hi jeka, das war tatsächlich ein Versehen! Ich habe die Straße nicht aufgesplittet! Ich behebe es gleich morgen früh!
mcliquid (2021-10-13 05:54:34+00:00): Hab die Eigenschaften wiederhergestellt. Vielen Dank für deine Aufmerksamkeit!
jeka p (2021-10-14 19:13:56+00:00): vielen Dank! gerne-gerne :)
julcnx (2021-10-12 13:30:35+00:00): Please stop immediately what you are doing. Check your emails.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112418030
eggie (2021-10-12 15:36:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback... Alle begin is moeilijk. Je hebt een leeg lijntje met name=road over de weg 'gespannen'.  Wat is hier precies je bedoeling?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-12 15:53:14+00:00): Het lijntje heb ik nu verlegd naar het achterom bij nr 26.
highway=service
service=alley
access=private

MVG
eggie
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-11-15 12:26:11+00:00): Hallo Kristof,

Bedankt voor de toevoeging!
Layft Greater (2022-05-28 15:45:10+00:00): FYI Not a ford, but a culvert 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/700916861/history
aweech (2021-10-12 22:06:01+00:00): Hi,
I reviewed your edit as you requested. It looks good; I didn't find any issues besides a misapplied direction tag on a way (that I resolved). Thanks for helping out with this!
dead10ck (2021-10-12 22:07:56+00:00): Awesome, thanks for looking over it!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112418519
JochenB (2022-09-12 20:48:16+00:00): Hallo Andre, 

ich war gerade auf der Suche nach Ferienunterkünften und bin über deine Einträge in Kauppa gestolpert. Hier hattest du von einem Jahr eine größere Anzahl an Ferienhäusern eingetragen (tourism=chalet), z. B. das hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9167501217 

Wolltest du mit tourism=chalet etwas anderes ausdrücken? Laut Wiki sind das frei stehende Ferienhäuser, die man mieten kann.

Wenn nein: Kannst du mir sagen, wer diese vermietet, im Netz finde ich nichts dazu? 

Ich finde es auch merkwürdig, dass es so viele Ferienwohnungen in diesem kleinen Ort gibt und dass diese außerhalb von Häusern getaggt sind. Hat der Ort irgendeine touristische Besonderheit? 

Viele Grüße,
Jochen
JochenB (2022-10-02 21:42:14+00:00): Hallo Andre, 

bitte antorte auf diesen Kommentar, damit wir schauen können, was du eigentlich eintragen wolltest. Ich vermute sehr stark, dass das hier falsch ist. 

Grüße,
Jochen
AndersAndersson (2021-10-24 11:53:46+00:00): Vad hände med "Andra sidan"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195722895/history
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andra_sidan,_Fagersta
Msiipola (2021-10-24 15:39:55+00:00): Stadsdel "Andra sidan" ska vara där det felaktigt nu står "Egna hem" väster om Kolbäcksån. Jag har uppdaterat det.
AndersAndersson (2021-10-24 21:34:07+00:00): Toppen!
aceman444 (2024-08-18 12:03:17+00:00): These buildings look like towers, they do not comprise the bridge.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-14 09:49:25+00:00): Hi! Adding only the name as tag is useless. That tag is not machine readable in order to ender on a map. You rather need to add the relevant tag expressing the feature. By Felsencamp, i guess it's either a picnic site with several picnic structure with bbq, picnic tables, benches, grass areas... the tag is "tourism=picnic_site" or just a picnic table, then the tag would be leisure=picnic_table. With these tags you don't need to describe what the OSM element is in the name, which is considered in general a bad practice.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-14 09:50:09+00:00): typo correction: "in order to render on a map"*
Michael_SAugustin (2021-10-14 10:34:29+00:00): Hi, i understand your Point. Sorry that I did not find a good tag when using osmand. I simply did not know what to use.
It is a camping site for groups which you can book only in advance. It is not a classical camping place. There are also wooden huts to rent for the groups.
Please feel free to add a good tag, if there is one. The place is called Felsencamp because it is kind of a camp in a rocky (=Felsen) area.
Kind regards, Michael
SHARCRASH (2021-10-14 11:29:04+00:00): Thank you for the extra details! I did know of the facilities on the plateau but didn't know exactly which type of site. I made the changes.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-12 13:54:48+00:00): + JOSM crashed during edits if anything weird was generated, please let me know, i will gladly help.
gendy54 (2021-12-18 21:03:46+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de ne pas dégrader OSM avec des tags inappropriés.
eggie (2021-10-12 15:38:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
felipeeugenio (2021-10-12 17:32:51+00:00): Hola
Borraste caminos enteros y los reemplazaste por otros mas cortos. y alteraste la geometría entera de un camino principal y la reemplazaste por una mucho peor. Qué fue lo que intentaste hacer?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112420395
Jakuje (2022-02-24 11:29:34+00:00): Ahoj. Prosim, neznac potok, ktery prochazi pod budovou jako tunnel=building_passage -- tento tag je pro pruchody cest budovou a ne kanaly pod mlyny. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:tunnel#tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-02-24 14:06:03+00:00): Když tak mi to můžeš přeznačit.
Jakuje (2022-02-24 14:22:40+00:00): Uz se stalo, ale davam vedet, abys v tom nepokracoval, protoze to nemam v planu po tobe preznacovat vsude a donekonecna.
mueschel (2021-10-15 09:43:02+00:00): Hi,
could you check this building, it got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589846631
paunofu (2021-10-15 14:50:18+00:00): Solved, it was a copy paste problem
jleedev (2021-10-12 14:34:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
DaveF (2021-10-12 15:42:24+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass in not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.
L'imaginaire (2021-10-13 18:53:35+00:00): Op https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24791432/ heb je de highway-tag verwijderd, waardoor dit segment niet meer als weg herkend wordt en ook niet meer gebruikt wordt voor routering. Ik heb opnieuw highway=cycleway aan deze weg gehangen zoals ervoor, al zou het goed zijn om eens grondig te bekijken of cycleway wel de beste waarde is voor deze weg.
gscholz (2021-12-24 06:15:25+00:00): Hi _lbd,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of  "Quemú Quemú":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.56425&lat=-36.06612&zoom=14&opacity=0.57

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112421258

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
jimkats (2022-01-30 23:40:48+00:00): Σ' ευχαριστώ πολύ για την προσθήκη, έψαχνα να βρω που ακριβώς είναι :)
Vinber-Pro (2021-10-13 08:10:39+00:00): Bonjour (suite),
dans un ensemble de changements vous pouvez ajouter plusieurs objets.
Un arbre par "changesets" ce n'est pas nécessaire, voir déconseillé !

De plus pour les commentaires de changesets, je vous recommande la lecture de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

car l'ensemble des derniers commentaires est un peu "pareils" :D

bonne carto et merci pour l'amélioration des données
OTPBIJAUREGUIBERRY (2021-10-13 08:36:51+00:00): Bonjour, 

Ayant débuter sur OSM depuis peu je vous remercie pour vos recommandation et au plaisir de contribuer au mieux sur cette plateforme.

En vous souhaitant une belle journée,

Iñaki.
Znaika (2022-06-14 08:01:31+00:00): Hallo,
User mesmt hat den Straßennamen geändert. Ist Helene-Weber-Straße richtig? Helene-Wessel-Straße ist hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991989762
Gruß,
Znaika
Znaika (2022-06-14 08:08:53+00:00): Hier sind auch Adressen Helene-Wessel-Straße 2, 4, 6 hinzugefügt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120804852#map=18/51.18881/6.70399
Wulfmorn (2021-10-12 23:44:11+00:00): I'm just wondering how you justify adding photos of random peoples private homes to "Open POI map". Your album says "OpenPoiMap - Tourist map with pictures is the best (Km2bp)". What do they have to do with tourism? Did you ask their permission? It's one thing to be swept up in something like StreetView, but here you've specifically added a picture of somebody's private residence. The memorial next to it - fine, completely fine with that, but peoples homes? It's creepy.
jmilot (2021-10-21 20:15:58+00:00): Hello!

Just a small comment :
When adding sidewalks, can you make sure that all related crossings are also mapped? Particularly this one : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992230666 , it lacks crossing Tassé/Cardinal and Cardinal/Millar. It's minor, but otherwise router that support walk won't know how to quit the sidewalk at those intersections.

Thank you and have a good day!
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 10:32:20+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and applied correct tagging for World of Smoke & Vape POI in changeset 183867969

https://osm.org/changeset/183867969
maraf24 (2021-10-15 08:11:10+00:00): A propo image=https://westnordost.de/p/64723.jpg
Zdjęcia ze StreetComplete są usuwane po pewnym czasie.
Mordechai23 (2021-10-27 19:47:05+00:00): noo, już nie ma
maraf24 (2021-10-14 22:26:03+00:00): Czyli
surface=paving_stones
paving_stones:shape=hexagon
:)
literan (2021-10-12 17:52:08+00:00): а что там за тротуар нарисовался https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992241216/history#map=15/55.8315/37.6972&layers=N ?

на хорде стоит знак "Дорога для автомобилей", движение пешеходов запрещено. Скорее всего это технический тротуар для обслуживания
solenoid jam (2021-10-13 05:37:18+00:00): Да, технический, но ограничивающих знаков я не видел. Туда можно пройти через зазоры в стене, что и происходит.
Надо как то ограничить проход?
literan (2021-10-13 06:47:52+00:00): увидел, что он три метра шириной - может, и не технический, слишком широкий. Странно, конечно, почему такой широкий тротуар сделали. Не знаю, пусть наверное без ограничений висит
solenoid jam (2021-10-13 07:16:06+00:00): Технические, они. Ни откуда ни куда не ведут, с пешеходной сетью не связаны. Ну разве что тропинками.
На проезд не тянет, местами непроезжаемо.
alijohn2050 (2021-10-18 11:43:09+00:00): any issue for release this location?
MCDA (2021-10-12 19:06:55+00:00): While there are mostly Christian burials right now, there have been studies that suggest this was a religious site before St Tiernan  founded the monastery here ~550. A site much like and related to the carvings on Boa and White Island and therefore may have been a site adopted by early Christians.
impey (2021-10-14 13:38:47+00:00): ok then please delete
MCDA (2021-10-14 14:58:11+00:00): No, I agree with you that there are Christian burials here.  But I just want to point out that many of these sites were in use before Christianity arrived in Ireland .  Your involvement in the local community would be appreciated.  We surely have the same goal here, in making OSM the best map it can possibly be.  I propose that it be dual tagged as religion=christian;pre-christian and a note explaining the situation.
hsc666 (2021-10-12 15:53:58+00:00): Hallo AxRu11 und willkommen bei OSM!

Du hast mit Deiner Änderung auch innerhalb der Wohnbebauung von Oberlüghausen (Menzlinger Weg Hausnummern 1-14) die Höchstgeschwindigkeit auf 100 gesetzt. Das sieht nicht plausibel aus. Wo gilt tatsächlich welche Geschwindigkeit?

VG
hsc666
berndw (2021-10-16 08:17:45+00:00): Moin

Beim Binghintergrund kann man das Ortseingangschild als Schatten erkennen, ich habe die Straße dort aufgeteilt und die Geschwindigkeit im Ort entfernt, ich kenne den Wert nicht.
berndw (2021-10-16 08:20:44+00:00): Die Straße als Wohnstraße einzustufen ist m.M.n. ebenso wie der Name nicht nicht korrekt. Ich würde hier eher zu unclassified ohne Name  tendieren, bei NRW-ALKIS ist kein Name angegeben.
Ich bin schon eine Weile nicht mehr dort gewesen, deswegen halte ich zurück
user_2066394 (2021-10-13 21:19:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dvacant
DaveF (2021-10-12 15:50:10+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass in not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.
SK53 (2021-10-12 16:31:19+00:00): Hi DaveF,

I've come across this, it looks to be an incorrect preset in the iD editor, clearly people have used landuse=grass to get greens to render, but that is wholly superfluous now. I'm not sure if anyone has raised an issue on GitHub about this, but it needs to be done. It is certainly tedious to have to correct landuse=grass to surface=grass each time & then have the editor yell when you save the edits.

Jerry
DaveF (2021-10-12 23:28:57+00:00): Hi
I'm ahead of you.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347

To me, Issue #2013 just highlights that iDs developers misunderstood tagging usage, as landuse=grass has never been used for sport pitches. I believe it's always been a primary tag, not a sub/adjective tag as iD were using it.

I'll follow up tomorrow.

Please add your own comments if you wish.

Sadly this isn't iDs only validator suggestion which oversteps the mark.
nitram1234 (2021-10-13 10:41:41+00:00): Thanks for the edit! Just for future reference, see if you can try to keep your edits in one region. For instance, for this edit, do the one in Italy and Iceland separately. Thanks again!
DaRkBoDoM (2021-10-13 10:54:52+00:00): That's one region indeed! Just a big one XD

Seriously, that's my first edit attempt using the OsmAnd app and I suppose what happened is that the app didn't upload the first Icelandic edit until i made a second edit a few months later.
MxxCon (2021-10-13 01:21:17+00:00): Hello.
Is it completely closed off for everybody or can pedestrians/cyclists still pass? To properly update the map so that software doesn't route people through this bridge, please also update "Allowed Access" section.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112423420
Adam Franco (2021-10-12 15:45:06+00:00): Note that Irish Hill/Falls/Marsett Roads have a functional classification of "Major Collector", but I'm rounding up to prevent Spear from being a spur in the secondary network.
Nearby0051 (2021-10-23 12:31:33+00:00): Bist du dir sicher, dass der Shop so heißt?
Der Name steht so auf dem Gebäude, aber das könnte ja auch eine Baufirma sein
Katzenstreu (2021-10-23 22:53:38+00:00): Dieser kleine Holzkasten hat eigentlich keinen Namen. Der Bauernhof (Inhaber) ist mit diesem Familienname mn beschriftet. Aber mit diesem Namen ist der Shop auffindbar, besser als ohne Namen?
Nearby0051 (2021-10-24 12:20:28+00:00): Finde ich auch schwer. Eventuell sollte der Name eher auf das Gebäude, aber ich bin auch zufrieden mit der aktuellem Implementation
Katzenstreu (2021-10-26 19:30:44+00:00): Der Name würde auch am Verkaufsstand UND am Bauernhaus Sinn machen. Mache das gerne.
Adam Franco (2021-10-12 15:56:32+00:00): This change is a rounding up of the Shelburne Falls-Hinesburg road from a FC of Town-maintained "Major collector" to secondary, but it allow the lower part of Spear, Irish Hill and Dorset which have an FC of Town-maintained "Minor arterial" to avoid being stubs. As well, connecting the larger town centers of Hinesburg and Shelburne via secondary makes sense from a connectivity standpoint.
literan (2021-10-12 17:48:24+00:00): не надо ОРАТЬ
barbershop_borodach (2021-10-19 15:06:58+00:00): Такая стилистика :)
confusedbuffalo (2021-10-15 17:08:20+00:00): Hi, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/577319858 you added the postcode as CT19 166D
I assume you meant this as the ref, but the ref is already tagged as CT19 166
I think that ref is correct, as the D is some sort of extra code.
20180911 (2021-10-16 08:45:23+00:00): Thank you for your comment. I had not read the wiki page until now. Except on the post box label I cannot see the D anywhere else. On https://www.royalmail.com/services-near-you/postbox/cherry-garden-lane-ct19-4as/000CT19166 (not used as source) there is no D so I think you are right, the ref should be CT19 166. At https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=post_box#Locating_postboxes_in_the_UK they write that the D was introduced in 2014 and I think it would be good to have the same ref over the years.
Any idea if I should omit the D in my surveys, add a note, or introduce a new tag, as most post boxes in this area have it?
confusedbuffalo (2021-10-17 19:11:01+00:00): It's come up with someone else too, and I guess add it. It's how it's referenced on the ground, so makes sense to add it like that on here too
confusedbuffalo (2021-10-17 19:12:37+00:00): I've changed the ref on that postbox to have a D
20180911 (2021-10-18 11:55:43+00:00): Thank you. I will add it as reference with D in my future surveys, not as postcodes like I did before.
SimonPoole (2021-10-13 15:34:07+00:00): Hallo (Nachbar anscheinend), danke für die Mithilfe an OSM. 

Mir sind ein paar kleine Sachen aufgefallen die nicht so optimal sind, einerseits wäre es hilfreich etwas aussagekräftigere Changeset Kommentare zu machen, da "Ergänzungen" alles oder nichts bedeuten kann. Dann ist mir weiteren aufgefallen, dass du die Accesstags viel zu kompliziert machst. Für ein typischer Wirtschaftsweg genügt ein motor_vehicle=agricultural oder ähnlich (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Switzerland/Map_Features#Andere_h.C3.A4ufige_Beschilderungen), also access=no und alles das weglassen. Die Grütstrasse und die anderen Wege da sind übrigens eindeutig highway=track tracktype=grade1 und nicht highway=unclassified, dass hat anscheind jemand vor Jahren verschlimmbessert.

Gruss

Simon
gileri (2022-01-01 09:50:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Tu as indiqué que l'accès à l'impasse Amblard est privé pour tous les usagers, y compris vélo et piétons. Quand j'y étais passé il me semble que c'était autorisé pour ces deux usagers, n'est-ce plus le cas ?