piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_4493657 (2022-01-08 16:15:43+00:00): Ok. Już czaję:) Staram się w miarę możliwości (o ile zauważę) usuwać zapomniany tag proposed jeśli współistnieje z nowo oddaną drogą. W tej chili nie mogę sobie przypomnieć, gdzie w tym rejonie oddawałem do użytku nowo wyremontowaną lub wybudowaną drogę.
user_4493657 (2022-01-08 16:20:34+00:00): Wieczorem nad tym przysiądę. Dzięki charl3s za zwrócenie na to uwagi.
PolyDunami (2021-11-27 02:00:47+00:00): At the border crossing, Roosevelt Way has been blocked off from Tyee Drive. This changeset was made with that in mind.
felipeeugenio (2021-11-28 22:59:31+00:00): Hola. Hay un supermercado ahora con otro nombre? o no hay un supermercado?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114282635
JJIglesias (2021-11-27 02:56:27+00:00): Creo q cuando se refieren al Diametro, es al Diametro del tronco y NO de la copa del Arbol. 20 metros de Diametro es mas que las Sequoias o los Baobab que son famosos por sus gruegos troncos. Sugiero Revises esos Valores.
Slds
JJIglesias (2021-11-27 02:59:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:diameter
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:12:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.

Please check if there is a shadow of the building next to it. In 1 occasion you mapped a piece of land as a building

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114282956
abakus_uploader (2021-11-27 23:39:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2021-11-27 09:46:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114283016
MikeN (2021-11-27 03:08:14+00:00): Hi, you changed a state highway into a cart path, along with a number of other roads.  Openstreetmap is used for navigation and this will disrupt other users.
Casey_boy (2022-11-09 16:28:45+00:00): Hi,
What is the source for way 903615352 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903615352)? No service road appears to exist here on any satellite imagery. Is this an error?
Thanks.
amurski (2022-11-09 21:37:33+00:00): There is clearly some sort of track on recent Maxar imagery. I don't recall why I tagged it as service road, perhaps the dark colour suggested asphalt but it may be a simple track
Frans S (2021-11-27 09:37:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114283534
Jean-Marc Liotier (2022-05-04 16:13:49+00:00): I'm glad you restored relation 12571016 - thanks ! Bert Araali was adamant it isn't appropriate, he reverted it and I didn't want to confront him. How did you decide to restore it ?
cjhond (2021-11-28 20:39:10+00:00): Restaurant operating
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114283829
cjhond (2021-11-28 20:34:49+00:00): Building emptied for new construction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114283849
cjhond (2021-11-28 20:37:42+00:00): Current Laundromat
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114283849
cjhond (2021-11-28 20:33:07+00:00): New restaurant
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114283859
EnumMapper (2021-12-12 16:10:02+00:00): 请勿使用Bing aerial imagery 这个地图很旧
Frans S (2021-11-27 09:36:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114284017
ElliottPlack (2021-12-13 03:14:14+00:00): UPR: Any reason you removed the residential and retail landuse around Miesville? These look like good landuses to me.

- Elliott Plack
OSM Foundation
Data Working Group
RedSkies (2021-12-13 03:16:24+00:00): Oh yes, sorry about that. I remove them so I can put buildings there because it’s easier for me to do that without there being an area of something. Sorry.
Greg_Rose (2021-12-13 06:35:00+00:00): @UnionPacificRailfan Keyboard shortcuts are your friend in iD: Use the "w" key to toggle in and out of wireframe mode - that will easier to map inside a colored polygon.
ElliottPlack (2021-12-13 16:49:15+00:00): Thanks, Greg! Yes, you can also use the filters in iD to hide landuse. at the bottom of the "Map Features" tab in the editor there is a box to hide any landuse so as not to get in the way of mapping.
skyper (2021-11-28 13:43:25+00:00): Hey donovaly
Leider hat iD mal wieder alle Relationen beschädigt. Bitte checke alle Relationen manuell oder verwende einen besseren Editor.
Habe es korrigiert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114324576)

Hast Du eine Ahnung wie lange die Baustelle noch besteht? Sollte eigentlich dieses Jahr noch beendet werden, oder? Bei so kurzen Zeiten, ist es meist besser mit `:conditional` in den Access-Tags zu arbeiten.

Grüße skyper
donovaly (2021-12-01 01:45:51+00:00): Ich verstehe nicht, denn ich habe an den Relationen gar nichts verändert.

Der Editor ist so clever, dass wenn man etwas auf baustelle setzt, die Relation nicht mehr Live ist, ist die Baustelle fertig, ist die Ralation wieder Live. Insofern musst man eigentlich nichts machen. Und aktuell fährt die Linie 14 ja auch nicht da lang.

Die Baustelle ist bei mir ums Eck, ich habe sie daher im Blick. Sie ist erst vor 2 Wochen auf die aktuelle Größe ausgedehnt worden. Sie wandert auch noch bis nächstes Jahr in Schritten bis zur Eschholzstraße.

VG donovaly
skyper (2021-12-01 13:50:29+00:00): Hey,
Danke für die Infos zur Baustelle.

Ja, ich weiß, dass Du nur die Baustelle eingetragen hast. Die Baustelle ist aber nicht der springende Punkt, sondern das Aufteilen der Straße. iD schafft es seit geraumer Zeit (einigen Jahren) dabei alle Routen-Relationen zu beschädigen, weil das neue Objekt an der falschen Stelle einsortiert wird.

VG skyper
donovaly (2021-12-04 20:10:39+00:00):  > sondern das Aufteilen der Straße

Na ja, die Baustelle ist ja der Grund des Aufteilens. Wie gesagt, dass die Relationen dadurch gebrochen werden, ist nicht schlimm, denn die Relationen sind aktuell ja auch wirklich nicht durchgängig. Und wenn ich die Straße wieder ändere, weil die Baustelle fertig ist und wieder durchgängig ist, fixe ich die Relationen.

Hab vorhin geschaut und die Baustelle wird vsl. noch vor Weihnachten ein Stück nach vorne rücken.
skyper (2021-12-13 13:26:00+00:00): Hey donovaly
Wenn Du Dich um die Relationen nach der Baustelle kümmerst, ist das bei den Buslinien ok. Mich stören die Meldungen der "Lücken" bei PTNA, aber damit kann ich leben auch wenn es mMn keinen Sinn macht eine falsche Reihenfolge zu verwenden.
Hast Du bei solchen Aktionen, auch Wander-Routen auf dem Schirm?

Grüße skyper
SekeRob (2021-11-27 13:47:56+00:00): Hi,

The whole mapping world had your changeset delivered in the local CS history view, and the mapping world gets dozens delivered in that view of zero interest to the local mapper. No telling though as the comment just says it coastline fixing. I looked at Nun-Rock, it's now in a 1 member MULTIpolygon. That's incorrect AFAIK.

cheers.
Lee Carré (2021-11-27 16:28:22+00:00): http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Andre68 (2021-11-27 19:49:27+00:00): Well roared lion! If you think you can fix it a better way, than simply do it!!
SekeRob (2021-11-28 08:10:38+00:00): The 'fix' is 'simply' too easy, fools the system into accepting the MP by making it think it's the real deal. It requires the selection of any single  polygon node and applying the scissor icon to it e voilà, you've got an MP.

:o)))
Andre68 (2021-11-28 10:45:22+00:00): I simply don't know a better way of tagging this correctly. The problem is, that both bare_rock and coastline use the natural key. And the only way of using this both is a MP. Since this existing island was not visible on the map, I added the coastline. As coastline must be tagged on the way, the bare_rock goes to the MP. If you know a better way, please let me know.
SekeRob (2021-11-28 11:14:17+00:00): I've resolved the multipolygon issue for you as per my previous post. If you now look at the MP relation there are 2 coastline parts.
Rendering... Visited some other 'rock' and they've been mapped e.g. as place=islet and render, but in carto there's rendering priority so it's possible that a rock in the sea just shows underwater. In that more tagging is available at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:seamark:type=rock seamark:rock:water_level=dry. 
The key has 32K uses. Added that just to see what happens. Tomorrow morning, CET, Osmose would send me a list of new problem issue that have my doings associated with it (I clear my list daily).

ciao
SekeRob (2021-11-28 11:17:56+00:00): Yup, it renders now... dry or MP was the issue.

ciao ciao
Weide (2021-11-28 06:17:54+00:00): In Deinen letzten Änderungssätzen trägst Du oft zusätzlich zu den eigentlichen Änderungen auch noch viele Nodes ohne Eigenschaften in die Datenbank ein. Ist das Absicht?
Siehe z.B. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114284577
Frans S (2021-11-27 09:35:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects.
G: Included the shadow of the mapped building in the mapping

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114284650
Frans S (2021-11-27 09:30:13+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114284669
ravali_78 (2021-11-29 13:00:21+00:00): Hi JanOK1337,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with highway.Kindly check with way 903704380,way 902956528,way 901467550,way 153579028,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114360736.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114284683
Herman Lee (2022-04-24 12:22:33+00:00): 您的这个编辑集存在错误，现在退回
Lee Carré (2021-11-27 16:28:50+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
iWowik (2021-12-06 05:49:05+00:00): How nice it would be if every time you write this comment to me, you would also write to the developers of the tool you are using!
Lee Carré (2021-11-27 16:29:49+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
iWowik (2021-12-06 05:51:25+00:00): I think you should write about the disadvantages of monitoring changes to the mailing list.
limes11 (2021-11-29 12:29:14+00:00): Hi, 

hast Du hier bewusst Knoten in Düsseldorf erzeugt? Die Box ist sehr groß, hier ist wohl etwas schiefgelaufen.

VG, Limes
alessandrocarmeli (2022-02-20 13:30:43+00:00): Trieste trasporti?
Luther C Blissett (2021-11-28 10:17:38+00:00): Hi Hiausirg,

I've restored a few of the ways deleted by you in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114318301
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114285803
Have these deletions meant to be temporary?
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
literan (2021-11-27 13:11:01+00:00): добрый день. 

amenity	parking
parking	street_side это парковка в краманах. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:parking=street%20side?uselang=ru

вдоль улицы Фомичевой не карманы, а парковочная полоса на проезжей части https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CCUuZCrATA

ее не следует мапить как полигон с вышеуказанными тегами. Такие парковки отмечают через теги parking:lane (конкретно здесь parking:lane:right=parallel) на линии дороги. Исправил.
dmitrу (2021-11-27 14:02:01+00:00): хорошо, буду знать
kuhni74 (2022-06-09 12:34:12+00:00): Vielen Dank nochmal für das Verbessern der Felsinseln im Gletscher! Wäre es möglich, auch noch das zu groß geratene Schlatenkees (sh. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2893795) aufzusplitten? Das übersteigt leider meine technischen Fähigkeiten.
Helium314 (2022-06-09 14:20:23+00:00): Meine leider auch, sorry.
Mit iD wird das ziemlich mühsam, da brauchst du wohl jemanden der mit JOSM arbeitet.
fabiotofy (2021-11-27 11:27:12+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto. Hai creato un punto senza nessuna etichetta il che dice poco. Volevi per caso inserire un indirizzo ? Prova a dare un occhio a questa guida che ti spiega bene come fare: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses oppure dai un occhio quì: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Numeri_civici . Se ti serve aiuto chiedi pure
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114286048
Patr1k_P (2021-12-01 13:58:57+00:00): ahoj,,takto sa naucny chodnik neznaci...robi sa to formou relacii

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:route%3Dhiking

napr.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/568998

...ak si tam bol a vies kde zacina,mozem to spravit...podla tej stranky neviem urcit kde je zaciatok (prva info tabula)
abakus_uploader (2021-11-27 23:39:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mcliquid (2022-05-24 17:02:45+00:00): Hi, you have warped the road here so that navigation becomes impossible. Please pay better attention to what you upload in the future! Thank you very much.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9287675327/history
Dave Venables (2021-11-28 11:12:03+00:00): Not all of the old3_amenity, old_name1 etc. tags were added by me but I was the last person to edit the ways and nodes and did not correct until yesterday
iandees (2021-11-27 14:34:51+00:00): Do you have a wiki page or explanation about how you're doing this wide-scale classification changes? So far I haven't seen anything that is alarming, but it'd be good to document how you made these decisions somewhere for the next time someone reclassifies all the roads in the metro.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114287583
TurntSnacko (2021-11-30 08:42:04+00:00): Yes, so, what I did was read the two articles on road classification in the states: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging & 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance. While I was reading them I took notes on the defining features that separate the road types, which I listed out: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/888489953665896559/915159837099303002/unknown.png. The TL:DR is, 
Motorway: I have no intention of editing motorways, at least not yet.
Trunk: Motorway-like with at-grade intersections, >TBD vehicles a day
Primary: >20,000 vehicles a day 
Secondary: >10,000 vehicles a day
Tertiary: >1,000 vehicles a day.
I find all the traffic data from MNDOT: https://mndot.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=7b3be07daed84e7fa170a91059ce63bb.
neuhausr (2021-11-30 15:51:53+00:00): I noticed a gap of different classification at S 4th St near the courthouse. The 2nd wiki page you cite talks about not creating islands of classification based solely on traffic counts, so I hope you're keeping that in mind, as well as trying to ensure classifications maintain a connected network when viewed as a whole. Not criticizing what you've done, but just pointing out there's a bit of art as well as science to US road classifications...as you can tell from the ~15 years of discussions on this topic with no clear resolution! :)
TurntSnacko (2021-11-30 19:22:14+00:00): Ah thanks yeah I missed that one, I've fixed it in the next update. I know about not having islands of classification, I've been making all of my edits based on this. For example, Central Avenue Northeast meets the condition for Primary classification (>20,000 per day) in Columbia Heights, from I-694 to 40th Avenue Northeast, but there is no primary road to connect it to anywhere nearby so I had to mark it as secondary. If you see any other small sections of road I missed feel free to tell me or just edit them yourself.
neuhausr (2021-12-01 17:55:55+00:00): Sounds good, thanks for clarifying!
kapazao (2021-11-30 17:50:43+00:00): Hello, please do not use uppercase names. In this case it sould be "Amazonia Fine Food".
You can learn the use of names from wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114287651
Владимир К (2022-07-26 17:18:47+00:00): не нужно указывать в ref куда ведет вход
Frans S (2021-11-27 09:43:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping 
Please follow the guidline how to tag highways 
You tagged an entrance to a house as a Motorway !! tag service is at best.
Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
Best regards
IlBano (2022-01-24 17:30:08+00:00): Buonasera Antonio.
In questo changeset hai impostato un tratto della tangenziale  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001721880) come chiusa al traffico (access=no). E' un errore, una situazione temporanea, ... ?
Puoi controllare ?

Grazie

IlBano
Antonio Giudici (2022-01-25 18:30:08+00:00): Era sicuramente un errore di cui non mi ero accorto, grazie
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:27:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114288128
joost schouppe (2022-03-16 21:21:05+00:00): You didn't just change the name, you also removed the road type! I've fixed it just now.
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:18:32+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here.
Do you have local knowledge about the purpose of the buildings you map?
If not. please keep yourself on the instructions . Tag buildings just as building=yes. No further taggings
Please do not include the walled yard of a building in the building you map.
Also, square each rectangular building with the Q key
Best regards