piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigpoint (2016-12-01 12:44:09+00:00): HI, this change seem to have been copied from http://www.flintshire.gov.uk/en/pdffiles/tourism/flintshire-leisure-tour.pdf, did you obtain written permission to use this data as stated in the copyright notice within the document?
Also the maps within it are 'Crown Copyright' meaning we absolutely cannot use any data within them.
Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines
I believe this changeset should be reverted.
SiHollett (2016-12-01 13:16:29+00:00): I drove it, saw the signs (hence 'marked'), and then provided the document to explain what the route is.
trigpoint (2016-12-01 18:13:11+00:00): If you have driven it, and seen the signs, then that is the ultimate in good data.
Routes are mapped as relations that combine the ways, there are many examples in OSM, such as the National Cycle Network. Tagging signs will not mean anything, especially a node with just a reference, chances are they will be removed as the only way to find them will be to trawl back through the change history.
Signs should be mapped as man_made=sign and put in their actual position, rather than the centreline of the road, although in this case we tend to just go with the relation.
If you need any help creating that, just ask.
Sergey82K (2017-07-06 13:25:26+00:00): Якась помилка:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420626523#map=18/50.45418/30.52001
bpowell1 (2016-05-25 18:07:32+00:00): Actually Honduras.
literan (2016-05-25 12:23:12+00:00): Почему больница-то?
Александр1978 (2016-05-25 12:54:36+00:00): Фиг знает. Реабилитация, медицинский термин вроде.
literan (2016-05-25 12:57:31+00:00): это стандартное российское наименование для по сути интернатов для умственно отсталых + оттуда врачи ходят на дому помощь оказывать более здоровым. Я поправил на более корректный тег.
Александр1978 (2016-05-25 12:57:56+00:00): Хотя, сейчас прочитал направление центра, надо заменить на что то другое. Вечером подправлю
Александр1978 (2016-05-25 12:58:54+00:00): Ну, ок раз подправил.
bpowell1 (2016-05-25 18:06:49+00:00): Actually Honduras.
Athalis (2016-05-25 22:39:30+00:00): *Bilderung->Beschilderung
bpowell1 (2016-05-25 18:06:29+00:00): Actually Honduras.
jlcod (2016-05-30 19:57:49+00:00): Adventure path looks weird, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/578104
bpowell1 (2016-05-25 18:05:43+00:00): Actually Honduras.
bpowell1 (2016-05-25 18:06:07+00:00): Actually Honduras.
bpowell1 (2016-05-25 18:05:22+00:00): Actually Honduras.
user_5359 (2016-05-25 04:20:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: A name isn't a description. If a business is permanently closed, delete the information or add an disused: prefix to the object.
user_5359 (2016-05-25 04:24:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If there exist a building, please add the tag building=retail (instead landuse=retail) to the line.
rw_ (2016-05-29 15:41:22+00:00): Please use descriptive changeset comments.  It is important to tell other mappers why you are editing.
maraf24 (2016-06-28 20:38:27+00:00): Co to za muzeum?
utack (2016-10-04 22:05:53+00:00): Hi Samuel,
are you sure Atmosphere Kanafushi is in the right location?
Kanafushi might be this island, or am I mistaken?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/5.0129/72.9615

Best 
Jakob
WoodWoseWulf (2016-05-25 04:04:41+00:00): Description is incorrect, sorry - this changeset fleshes out the ruins of the Morriset Hospital for the Criminally insane, including adding a number of other names that it was known by. Marked out the buildings in the ruin, changed the ruin from "walls" to "ruin" marked tracks in and out of the ruins and redefined the edges to better match the treeline around the ruins.
BCNorwich (2016-05-25 05:34:24+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see your first addition to the OSM database. The node looks as if it is in a field behind a residential area. May I remind that features on OSM must be verifiable on the ground. Although there may be some merit in the added feature in this position and tagged such it looks fictitious.
Please make corrections, state the accuracy of the feature, or remove it if it is a fiction. I can help with this if you wish.
Regards
freebeer (2018-06-11 11:49:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59738835 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me misc shelter spam
Jothirnadh (2016-05-25 05:31:19+00:00): Sorry wrong comment. I was fixing the alignment of the roads in this changeset.
ionutr_telenav (2017-05-03 13:37:30+00:00): Hi! I noticed that you changed the name of the road Chemin François-Chastelain in rue Henri-Audet. Can you please tell me what source you used? Thank you!
Gizmot (2017-05-04 03:38:57+00:00): Back to its old name again it seems:
http://www.lapresse.ca/le-nouvelliste/vie-regionale/trois-rivieres/201703/20/01-5080673-le-comite-de-toponymie-revivra.php
ionutr_telenav (2017-05-04 06:37:15+00:00): Thank you very much for the information. I have another question: You are local? Can I ask you for information regarding Trois-Rivières OSM map if I'll be in doubt?
Gizmot (2017-05-04 23:49:44+00:00): sure, I dont live there anymore but I know the place
Goffredo (2016-05-25 22:18:43+00:00): Hi, are you sure about the name change? The CUS (Centro Sportivo Universitario) is not here, and the previous name was imported from the dataset provided by BresciaTrasporti....
user_5359 (2016-05-25 10:30:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice a object with leisure=park can't be a point, it should be a closed way. And see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24295319 is this part of your park?
GerdP (2017-09-06 15:29:43+00:00): Hi! Please review typo oneway=RD4
No idea what you meant with this.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-23 20:18:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43901873 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed import
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-14 06:50:20+00:00): Note that later edit that appears very similar was made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44625597
poornibadrinath (2016-06-03 11:19:27+00:00): I had updated the wrong changeset comment by mistake. This is the correct changeset comment for this task. 
Updating turn restrictions in Phoenix Mapillary imagery https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/187
dudka (2016-05-25 11:31:08+00:00): якась дивна правка, перевірте чи все вірно зроблено: чому вул. Драгоманова стала Микитським провулком?
militrik (2016-05-25 20:51:50+00:00):  Ченджсет #39566974. Дякую.
AkageMuk (2016-05-26 11:13:37+00:00): Sveiks! Vai nav tā, ka koledžai ir jābūt amenity=college ?
richlv (2016-05-26 11:37:17+00:00): jā, paldies - izlaboju.
maps.me tāda nebija, un es vēl nepaspēju no kompja salabot :)
eggie (2020-10-25 16:20:57+00:00): Dag Harm.. 
Al even geleden deze changeset... 
Wanneer het geen officiële naam heeft, maar wel door de bewoners zo genoemd wordt gebruiken we loc_name=   Pas je het aan?

Dat staat dan in de data, maar rendert niet.
MVG,
eggie
kartler175 (2016-05-30 16:25:54+00:00): Warum überziehst Du Straßen mit Gras und Gebüsch:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420605320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420722501
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420722503 ?
Arnaldur (2016-05-31 05:48:44+00:00): Warum sollte ich das nicht tun?

Ich weiß, dass es in den Foren dazu konträre Meinungen gibt.

Habe mir die Arbeit von einigen Mappern angesehen. Siehe z.B. die Umgebung von Wiehe oder Freyburg/Unstrut. Habe für mich entschieden diese Art der Darstellung zu wählen. Finde ich besser als die grauen Ränder die entstehen, wenn man Flächen neben Straßen und Wegen enden lässt.
Supaplex (2018-12-25 06:24:30+00:00): 請問冬山環線的資料來源在哪裡?
目前運研所環騎圓夢網站並沒有這條路線。
疑似位置附近有冬山聯絡線，但並沒有對應編號
SK53 (2019-02-18 15:13:46+00:00): Is the Kingdom Hall in Liskeard really a Lutheran church. Seems a little unlikely in Cornwall. Kingdom Halls are usually Jehovahs Witness PoW.
UniEagle (2019-02-20 09:29:26+00:00): @SK53,  Dont recall why it was set to Lutheran,  Does seem llike it should be a JW location.  Feel free to correct.
poornibadrinath (2016-06-03 11:23:44+00:00): I had updated the wrong changeset comment by mistake. This is the correct changeset comment for this task. Updating turn restrictions in Phoenix Mapillary imagery https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/187
Hjart (2016-05-26 13:48:49+00:00): What source (imagery) did you use here?
Todeskuh (2016-05-26 16:06:03+00:00): Hi, I used the standard Bing aerial images. The other source is called Geodatenbehörde Dänemark (I don't know the english or danish translation). Is something not to your liking?
Hjart (2016-05-26 16:17:34+00:00): Oh, I was just wondering why there was no imagery_used tag in this changeset.
I checked your work and only found a few unconnected paths, so was ok.
The Geodatastyrelsen imagery is currently from spring 2015 and newer than the Bing imagery (apart from Bornholm), but on Fanø the difference is negligible.
Todeskuh (2016-05-26 16:31:14+00:00): Good, I was afraid I messed up something important.
Hjart (2016-06-02 08:35:39+00:00): I notice that you have retagged a number of surface=pebblestone (which I'm responsible for) etc. to simply "unpaved". I guess I'll have to revert that part.
anderfo (2016-06-22 21:45:10+00:00): Jeg støtter beslutningen.
Supaplex (2016-05-25 11:56:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
alphensebezorger (2016-05-26 19:01:10+00:00): Hello  Emma 江,

please stop adding chinese characters to dutch names. They show up on the map for all users. You can add them in name:zh=....
Name should just be the local name.
Thank you.
Commodoortje (2016-05-25 11:45:16+00:00): Sven, Ik vraag me werkelijk af of je enig respect hebt voor mede mappers.
Commodoortje (2016-05-25 11:46:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39552913
Je veegt rigoureus de aangebrachte windturbines van de kaart, en brengt ze op jouw manier aan.
Commodoortje (2016-05-25 11:47:31+00:00): En dit binnen 1 uur.
Commodoortje (2016-05-25 12:35:12+00:00): Mijn excuus over mijn uitgesproken gedachten. Het blijkt dat alles in goed overleg is geschiedt
FERINA365 (2016-05-25 13:20:15+00:00): Geen probleem, ik schrok al, haha. Fijne dag.
Frans S (2019-03-26 16:02:58+00:00): Hi.  Interesting Youtube video how to map tall buildings in dense areas

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs

Best regards
literan (2016-05-25 11:57:26+00:00): определитесь - там банкомат или все же отделение банка?
wulankhairunisa (2019-07-18 07:59:05+00:00): Halo Khairul,

Pemberian tag "name=Bangunan" pada objek bangunan adalah tidak tepat, karena dengan memberikan tag "building=... " sudah untuk memberikan informasi bahwa objek tersebut adalah Bangunan. 
Key "name" tepatnya harus diisikan dengan spesifik nama Bangunan itu sendiri.

Semoga membantu :)
trigpoint (2016-05-25 11:49:28+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Have you surveyed this location, is it a real bricks and mortar shop that is verifiable and I can visit?
The web site makes me suspicious that it is not a real shop (its hardly in a location to catch passing trade, but a marker for a web/phone business.
If verifiable, it is certainly not a bike shop, it should be tagged as amenity=bicycle_rental.
The web address should not be in the name tag, that really shouldn't appear on the map. The name is Beddgelert Bikes.
Cheers Phil
obswerve (2016-05-25 15:48:12+00:00): Hi Phil, it's a seasonal bike hire concern, not a bike shop. I know the proprietor and live locally. Apologies if I tagged it incorrectly - I'm on a learning curve. Kind regards, Paul
trigpoint (2016-05-25 17:16:08+00:00): Hi Paul
That looks better, you can add the following tags to complete the information if you wish
website=http://www.beddgelertbikes.co.uk
amenity=bicycle_rental

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2016-05-25 17:17:38+00:00): BTW
You will not always find the tags you need as editor presets but you can type in your own.
Hjart (2016-05-25 14:58:27+00:00): Before you get too busy with this, be aware that in the interest of keeping things fairly simple and manageable I will most likely remove any separate cycleways here.
docschenk (2016-05-25 17:00:21+00:00): I don't think that this is the right way to talk with each other.

Looking at Sönderjylland I found a lot of mistakes at one road with cycleways on both sides: partly marked with separate cycleways, partly just with a tag "cycleway=track", then  cycleways completely missing, although they are there. You should be glad, that someone else is correcting the South-Denmark-map. 
I don't delete anything, so no information will be destroyed. 
But for me as a biker it is essential to get the Information "cycleway=track" not only in the cyclemap but also in every "normal" map. And that does't work if the cycleways are not marked as separate ways.
If you don't stop destroying my work I will have to find a Danish "OSM arbitration board" to stop you!
Hjart (2016-05-25 17:35:13+00:00): I tried being diplomatic with you for quite some time, but since you didn't appear to really listen, I decided to stop that crap.

I agree that many cycleways in the eastern part of Sønderjylland are quite inconsequently mapped and have been for years. Initially (and for a long time actually) I was quite unsure what to do about them, so I just left them there. 

Also if you think you need all cycletracks to appear on "normal" maps I think you need to change your tools, not the data.

You are welcome to find your danish arbitration board. Mapping  cycleway=track rather than separate ways (unless there is good reason to) is commonly agreed upon among danish mappers and we expect you as a foreigner to respect danish custom.
docschenk (2016-05-25 19:18:17+00:00): "I agree that many cycleways in the eastern part of Sønderjylland are quite inconsequently mapped and have been for years. Initially (and for a long time actually) I was quite unsure what to do about them, so I just left them there."
That's the problem!

"we expect you as a foreigner to respect danish custom"
I do! But what is Danish custom?
- to map as cycleway=track?
- to map as separate way?
- not to map at all?
to map as cycleway=lane?
I found all of those possibilities. 
If I had your email-adress, I could send you some screenshots with all the different ways of mapping that are custom in Denmark!

So: What is Danish custom? It's impossible for me to find out. And your word is not enough.
How can a foreigner like me "learn" the Danish customs if there are none?

You say: "Also if you think you need all cycletracks to appear on "normal" maps I think you need to change your tools, not the data." 

How can I change the tools that are used by other people to create a map, that I want to download? You're talking nonsense! There is no possibility to show cycleways in OSM-maps except to map them as separate ways.

It's a pity, but with mappers like you, I would call them "self-crowned kings" in Germany, improvements will be blocked for many years. A bit more of self-criticism would do you good
Hjart (2016-05-25 19:54:31+00:00): The "Danish custom¨ referred to is described in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning (danish language) which I think I've actually referred you to earlier. I am by far the most active mapper in Denmark, but have been busy with other things, so cycleways have in many cases taken a backseat, but we're working towards it.
I do not agree that you necessarily need to be able to see every feature on every map and if you want to see all cycleways, I think you should use the cyclemap or similar and if the tools you use does not, I suggest you try to convince the developers to include that option.
Also I am more than enough self-critical and definitely do not need more of it
docschenk (2016-05-29 09:59:42+00:00): Once again me.

You may be interested in the German site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

You see, our leading OSMers are not that far away from each other.

You will know this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstier#Cykelstier_i_Danmark
Three sentences I want to present to you

"På trods af sin "tutorial" tilgang er dokumentet her ikke ment som en vejledning i at udarbejde cykelstier i OSM. Det er ment som en udforskning af forskellige situationer, som forhåbentlig kan medvirke til at kvalificere diskussionen ud over stadiet hvor der udelukkende udveksles synspunkter." Seems that even in Denmark the diskussion has not yet found an end.

"Afsluttende bemærkninger" ..."For dem som interesserer sig for at få et visuelt flot kort har tag-metoden den ulempe, at man er afhængig af de programudviklere som udvikler den software der skal "oversætte" fra tags til flotte kort."
As I already said: It's not me that can influence the developers. And even in the OSM cyclemap there is a difference between highway=cycleway and cycleway=track/lane: The cycleways appear already on the 2km scale, the tracks/lanes not before the 1 km scale.

And it will be a long way until the developers will have a program that can translate i.e. cycleway=track, distance to road=5m, width:cycleway=2m and so in a good map. Up to that day I will prefer to map separated cycleways as highway=cycleway. I also think that it is very inconsequent to map a footway as separate way but not the cycleway.

"Det er dog værd at huske på et af de vigtigste principper i Openstreetmap, nemlig at det er den individuelle mapper's skøn og lokalkendskab som er en af OSM's stærkeste fordele!"

The last sentence is the most important. You won't find in Germany a mapper who deletes other mappers work without saving the information. So if one mapper maps highway=cycleway it's no problem that the other one maps cycleway=path to the road. Leave both possibilities, one for the "flot kort", and the other for routing programs. And in a few years we will see what the developers have reached an we can decide for the better solution.

It's always worth to look over the borders and to find out how other countries do. The Netherlands are a bicycle nation, too. They don't have a problem with the "tegne-metoden", neither do the other European countries I looked at.

Have a nice week-end!
AMDmi3 (2016-05-27 17:51:20+00:00): Большая просьба именовать улицы в соответствии с http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
cucu (2016-06-01 13:39:24+00:00): Der korrekte Ortsname ist Margetshöchheim
Cor4852 (2016-06-06 14:28:42+00:00): OK, I have made a mistake 😏
naoliv (2016-07-20 13:03:39+00:00): Luiz, você está colocando vários objetos duplicados no mapa.
Por exemplo, se já existe o hospital representado por uma área, não é necessário representar também utilizando um nó.
sorcrosc (2016-05-25 19:11:42+00:00): the aquarium is already mapped so I removed your node keeping some useful info
woodpeck (2016-05-25 18:50:34+00:00): Dear zohre2109, thank you or your contributions to OSM. Please do not put house nunbers in the "name" tag, they belong in "addr:housenumber". You have also put house numbers in "addr:city", this is not correct either.

Please try to find a good description of your chnages when you upload; "ya ispravila zdaniye po karte bing" is not a good description because it is the same for every edit you make.
Polarbear (2016-07-01 23:31:20+00:00): Hallo, wie kann man denn in Bing den korrekten Verlauf der U7 erkennen? Oder welche Quelle hast du sonst benutzt? 

Ich sehe hier zwei Stellen, an denen du dem im Geoportal Berlin erkennbaren Verlauf herausgeschoben hast. 
(node 38901928, node 724507375)
fedc (2016-07-03 18:16:03+00:00): Hallo, den U-Bahn-Verlauf ist durch die Gebäudeorientierung zu erkennen. Außerdem ist er in vielen Karten enthalten.
Polarbear (2016-07-03 21:13:46+00:00): Erstens hast du unterirdische Streckenverläufe zwischen Bahnhöfen geändert, die eben nicht durch oberirdische Bauten erkennbar sind.

Zweitens darfst du nicht aus anderen Karten kopieren, deren Copyright nicht mit OSM kompatibel ist. Diese Quellen hast du auch nicht angegeben, sondern nur Bing.

Drittens sind U-Bahn-Verläufe auf Stadtplänen oft stilisiert und geben einen vereinfachten Verlauf wieder.
fedc (2016-07-04 08:22:09+00:00): Auf Stadtplänen sind sie oft stilisiert, aber auf die offizielle Karte der Berliner Stadtverwaltung sind sie präzis gezeichnet.
dieterdreist (2016-07-04 13:57:21+00:00): ich bin mir nicht ganz sicher, ob man die Pläne von SenStadt verwenden darf, bzw. welche man verwenden darf (ich glaube zu erinnern, dass man welche davon für OSM verwenden darf, vermutlich steht was dazu im WIKI von OSM).
Was die UBahnverläufe angeht, so laufen die meistens bzw. weit überwiegend unter öffentlichen Straßen, was zum einen mit vereinfachter Genehmigung (Wegerecht) zu tun hat, zum anderen mit besserer Zugänglichkeit, falls mal was von oben gemacht werden muss (meistens laufen die Berliner U-Bahnen ja nur wenige Meter unter der Oberfläche und wurden in offener Bauweise erstellt, anders als in vielen anderen Städten mit größeren Erhebungen, wo man auch mal sehr tief unter Tage im Tunnelvortrieb gebaut hat).
Polarbear (2016-07-04 14:32:42+00:00): Geodaten von SenStadt, mit den Nutzungsbestimmungen "http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/geoinformation/download/nutzIII.pdf" dürfen seit 2013 ausdrücklich in OSM genutzt werden, wenn im Changeset der Quellenvermerk "Geoportal Berlin / [Titel des Datensatzes]" erfolgt. Das trifft sowohl für die Karte K5, die Hausumringe / Hausumringe Hintergrund und die DOP der verschiedenen Jahrgänge zu. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geoportal_Berlin etc.
Dieser Vermerk fehlt aber im Changeset, ausserdem wurden die mir aufgefallenen Nodes ja gerade von de SenStadt-Daten _weg_geschoben.
Polarbear (2016-07-04 19:33:47+00:00): Ich habe das CS nochmal komplett kontrolliert. Zwar hast du den Bogen zwischen Jakob-Kaiser-Platz und Jungfernheide verbessert, aber absichtlich und ohne Begründung Bahnhofsdetails des U Jakob-Kaiser-Platz gelöscht. Auch passen deine unplausiblen Quellenangaben in dieser Diskussion nicht zur Veränderung der Daten.

Revert in CS 40484227, neuerliche Korrektur der Linie und Bahnhöfe in CS 40485049
fedc (2016-07-04 20:24:30+00:00): Ich habe die Bahnhofsdetails am U-Bhf. Jakob-Kaiser-Platz gelöscht, weil sie unrealistisch sind. Die Linie hat eigentlich durchgehend zwei Gleise, während in unserer Karte werden nur im Bahnhofsbereich zwei Gleise dargestellt.
Polarbear (2016-07-04 21:17:42+00:00): Die Kollegen beginnen hierzulande, Bahnhofdetails auch mit Indoor-Details zu mappen, und zwar extrem realistisch. 
Daten kommentarlos zu löschen und damit gemappte Verfeinerungen zu verwerfen, ist Vandalismus. Wenn du die genaue Lage der beiden durchgehenden Gleise zu bieten hast, kannst du sie ja eintragen, oberirdisch ist das ja schon vielerorts so.
dieterdreist (2016-07-05 07:40:44+00:00): +1 zum Vandalismus, Details zu löschen mit dem Hinweis, dass sie andernorts auch nicht gemappt sind, geht gar nicht
Nakaner (2016-07-06 19:21:16+00:00): Hallo fedc,

das Vorhandensein von nur einem Streckengleis außerhalb detailliert gemappter Stationen wird auf folgender Seite erklärt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracks

Viele Grüße

Michael
fedc (2016-07-08 14:58:37+00:00): Danke Michael!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-29 14:31:43+00:00): Hello!

You used
sport=skiing_s
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4207128990/history

Have you maybe meant
sport=skiing
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Leonmvd (2024-01-29 14:59:38+00:00): yes it was a typo, i fixed it now. Thanks for commenting!
SomeoneElse (2016-06-10 13:56:40+00:00): Thanks for fixing this.  I've tried to explain the problem to the previous editor: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/969 .