piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mattchn (2016-06-11 02:40:09+00:00): Not sure what was wrong here, I have re-tagged the lane count and the turn lanes which should be clearly visible in the Bing imagery
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400523691/history
yurasi (2016-06-13 18:35:20+00:00): Hello mattchn!
The satellite imagery aren't very clear, so I thought there wasn't any sign in the street. 
Thanks for your feedback and for re-tagging the way since this help us to improve OSM.
Alan (2016-06-10 19:40:32+00:00): Low tide: http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/metadata/4923/LC81510442016033LGN00/
High tide: http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/metadata/4923/LC81510442016113LGN00/
(via @imagico)
MikeN (2016-06-11 18:02:06+00:00): Hi, thank you for the fix.    It seems that using a  blank for the turn lane is not valid.   See the normal usages at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes   (the word 'none' is fully spelled out for special cases, but does not mean that no text is required )
piligab (2016-09-27 19:09:47+00:00): Hi MikeN,

Both the none and blank tag is used while tagging turn lanes as can be verified from taginfo. The Lane and road attributes style also takes both the tagging scheme as valid. Since, there is no consensus on the tagging style to be adopted, our team decided to stick with blank instead of none to maintain consistency in our edits.

Thank you for flagging this issue.
Supaplex (2016-06-11 02:59:49+00:00): Please don't remove the original name, you can use name:vi to add multilingual name
zors1843 (2016-06-11 06:12:01+00:00): P.M. to new mapper
5m4u9 (2016-06-11 22:40:41+00:00): este cambio no tiene sentido.

"exit_to_1" no es una etiqueta correcta, en su lugar siempre se utiliza ; para añadir varios lugares.

Acá debería ser: exit_to = Tin Tin en orden de quien esta más cerca. No hay un número válido, pero lo mejor es añadir dos o tres pueblos/vías cercanas.

Las salidas son salidas porque existe siempre una vía importante (arani - alalay) desde donde se "lee".

Los destination=Tin Tin (hacia tin tin) en cada vía "que sale" complementan la ruta. 

Como ya dije las otras veces el nombre muchas veces no tiene sentido, no tenemos un nombre oficiales. 

Si viste el mapa de Cochabamba es un desastre con los cruces describiendo cómo conducir un vehículo... ya no guían a nadie las salidas.

Desde mi punto de vista, los nombres deberían desaparecer y sólo las etiquetas internas quedarse para que al ver el receptor GPS/Android App te diga que salida con el nombre del pueblo tomar...
Hjart (2016-06-10 21:42:48+00:00): layer=-1 in connection with small streams should imho not be seen as an error.
WegefanHB (2016-06-11 02:07:05+00:00): Osmose said "A Stream under the Earth".
I did this mistakes very, very often. Layer -1 shall only used with tunnel od culvert. 
Best greetings to NAKSKOV.
Hjart (2016-06-11 05:34:07+00:00): Then Osmose is slightly wrong. layer=-1 does not mean under the earth. Only if there's also a tunnel=* is it "under the earth". I use layer=-1 with streams a lot because at this point I find it absolutely silly to have to make tunnel=culvert everywhere a stream goes under a road and I will probably add it back the next time I edit in this area.
WegefanHB (2016-06-13 16:22:02+00:00): Sorry, if I have distroyd your dates, I thought, I am repairing only my mistakes. 
But ... Osmose, keep right and the Wiki (-Djungle) say, that layer is neseccesary in the junctions of different ways. The Conputer and the Navi are only Boxes, therefor it must be told: A bridge is above, a culvert is under down. Also the renderer needs the layer.
redrace (2016-08-23 06:43:44+00:00): HUHU
Du hast hier ein Foot=no eingetragen. Das wird nur gemacht wenn dort auch ein Schild "Fußgänger verboten" steht. Das ist hier nicht der Fall. Ich würde dich bitten diesen Tagg an allen Straßen  wieder zu entfernen. Vor allem weil er auch noch überflüssig ist!
Schöne Grüße redrace
profgreenington (2016-08-25 02:06:48+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich hab das jetzt (hoffentlich überall) wieder entfernt. Warum ist der Tag denn überflüssig? Sind Landstraßen sowieso für Fußgänger gesperrt? Meine Überlegung war da, dass, bevor die Fußwege daneben eingetragen waren, die Fußgänger ja über die impliziten Fußwege auf der Straße geschickt wurden, und deshalb habe ich dann die Tags ergänzt, damit die dedizierten, einzeln eingetragenen Fuß- und Radwege genutzt werden.
redrace (2016-08-25 05:23:14+00:00): HUHU
Wir mappen nur das was wir sehen. wir mappen nicht für Router oder für Renderer. Ein guter Router wird für Fußgänger nicht die Straße nutzen wenn Fußwege eingezeichnet sind.
Constable (2017-02-21 15:34:52+00:00): Are you serious? Why did you put this thing up there in the middle of nowhere?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4236538967
According to Bing satellite images there are no buildings here. Do you have any local knowledge of the area?
slashme (2017-02-21 20:33:00+00:00): Well, we drove past there and I put it down approximately where the sign is, and when I checked their website, it seemed to agree with this. Maybe they're covered by trees, or maybe they're a bit away from the street.
Constable (2017-02-22 11:07:47+00:00): Hi, thanks for your answer. Comparing their website images with Bing satellite images I've realized that the B&B could be located here www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.98937/9.35488. I'll send them an email asking them to confirm their location.
Cheers
slashme (2017-02-22 12:06:56+00:00): Excellent! Sorry for the sloppy mapping work.
Constable (2017-02-22 12:19:41+00:00): Honestly, I don't think it's your fault; their website is not accurate.
Let's hope they'll answer my email.
Thanks for your help Sir!
cheers
Constable (2017-02-24 10:48:16+00:00): Sir, I got a reply from the b&b owner saying this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4236538967) is the right place.
I've already moved the node.
Thanks for your help!
slashme (2017-02-24 15:15:11+00:00): Well done! You're a hero :-]
mavl (2019-03-28 16:16:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Achoin (2016-06-11 20:39:16+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы внесли исправления в карту openstreetmap с помощью приложения MAPS.ME.
Ошибка: 1. Вы расположили магазин "Норман" на тротуаре за пределами здания.
2. Нет необходимости указывать адрес на добавляемом объекте, если он находится в пределах здания уже имеющего адрес.
Исправил. 
Перенес магазин в здание, удалил адрес.
Будьте внимательнее, спасибо за участие.
mavl (2019-03-28 16:16:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-28 16:16:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Glassman (2016-06-11 04:48:18+00:00): For privacy, we don't recommend putting your name on features. The exception is if the building is actually named. For example "Smith Towers" in Seattle
mueschel (2016-06-12 21:01:08+00:00): Hi Hendrikklaas,
you used the tag "decline=yes". Did you mean "incline=down"?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424203332

Jan
user_5359 (2016-06-11 06:11:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add the contact information to the guest house.
AkuAnakTimur (2016-06-11 14:58:54+00:00): "Outcrop 2"? Apakah?
Commodoortje (2016-08-06 07:05:10+00:00): Hoi Richard,

Goed van je dat je OSM wil gaan verbeteren.
Iedereen heeft in het begin, beginnersfoutjes.
Je hebt hier een stukje fietspad als doorgang aangebracht, maar deze is niet verbonden met de Rusthuisweg en hierom zal het ook niet kunnen routeren op bijvoorbeeld OSMAND.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3v4d0bqsuolz86z/2016-08-06_08-58-16.png?raw=1
Inmiddels heb ik het hersteld.
Tevens heb ik het naar highway=path gebracht, volgens mij staat er nl. geen bord verplicht fietspad.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging#Overige_wegen_en_paden
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM.
user_5359 (2016-06-11 06:08:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the point https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2144133507 ? I think these is a double entry.
hsc666 (2016-07-02 15:54:00+00:00): Soweit ich weiß, existiert der Weg 315125331, den Du hier gelöscht hast, weiterhin. Was ist der Grund für die Löschung?
naoliv (2016-06-11 11:42:19+00:00): Marcelo, o que você quis representar aqui no mapa?
jinalfoflia (2016-06-24 07:01:43+00:00): Hi Majid Khan Munjai,

I came across your edits, it seems like you have been adding `tourism=artwork` tag to restaurants, stations. This tag should not be used along with these tags. It'll be great if you can re-look into your edits and correct them. You can find more information regarding the tag here - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork .

Thanks,

Jinal Foflia
Supaplex (2016-06-11 04:04:37+00:00): 如果沒加上旅館的分類，在地圖上，或是用到OpenStreetMap地圖的App是不會顯示。
已經修正了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39945374
Supaplex (2016-06-11 06:13:53+00:00): 記得要加上分類，不然不會知道這間是什麼類型的店家
user_5359 (2016-06-11 06:53:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3474520743 (nearly same name), Is this a double entry? Please also the own note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/589484, did you have problems th change the opening_hours?

If you need help: You are welcome
Travellingturners (2016-06-12 06:08:51+00:00): Brooklyn FleaM is the same place and I couldn't see how to change the opening hours x
user_5359 (2016-06-11 06:59:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For the tag name use please the national language. If you want the description you can use the language code postfix (name:ko).
AkuAnakTimur (2016-06-11 14:57:49+00:00): Guest house "Baiduri" - homestay ke? Rumah sewa ke?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:34:21+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3854002 ?
dieterdreist (2016-06-22 15:50:40+00:00): you had created a duplicate with this edit, the object was already mapped in greater detail. Also, please refrain from CAPITALIZATION
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-07-05 14:49:54+00:00): Hi, is way 424238404 part of the temporary diversion to route NCN route 67?
It appears to be untagged.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424238404
maraf24 (2016-06-11 10:56:17+00:00): Duplikat.
newpavlov (2016-06-20 09:09:37+00:00): track не предназначен для обозначения качества дорожного покрытия, для этого есть теги surface и tracktype. Предлагаю вернуть обратно на service.
Mikhail Kozlov (2016-06-20 10:18:18+00:00): Согласен, справедливое замечание.
Supaplex (2016-06-11 09:54:28+00:00): 這邊是防空壕遺址，請問這次變動加上臺北的地址是？
dieterdreist (2016-06-22 15:39:28+00:00): this edit has changed the name of a bus stop to a laundry, this is likely not what you had in mind. I have corrected it. Please be careful when contributing to OpenStreetMap, thank you.
Warin61 (2017-10-16 21:31:08+00:00): Hi,
Why do you need to store on the data base where bing hi res imagery is? Looking at way 309325239. Should not you remove these rather than clutter the data base?
de vries (2017-10-16 21:53:40+00:00): Don't know exactly. But I can think of a few use cases. Outlines like this are are very common around the world at places were you can't expect hires imagery everywhere.
Also note that I didn't add them, I just improved the geometry of them.

Happy mapping!
Warin61 (2017-10-16 21:58:49+00:00): The presence of hi res imagery changes from time to time .. 'We' now have that 'Digital Globe Premium' imagery that looks to be good most places in png.
Endres Pelka (2021-01-30 22:57:30+00:00): Bzdura. Usuwam
maraf24 (2016-06-12 09:07:35+00:00): Duplikat.
R0bst3r (2016-06-15 07:45:33+00:00): Name changes checked and undone or improved. Wrong infos about not existing objects deleted.

Please don't use maps.me for such changes!
Piskvor (2016-06-13 08:42:26+00:00): Nice row of benches :) Do they have a backrest? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:backrest
5R-MFT (2016-06-14 11:13:53+00:00): I know, I will add all backrest when I'm back home and have computer.
literan (2016-06-16 10:28:02+00:00): фигню добавили, откатываю
SK53 (2023-02-01 11:20:47+00:00): You spelt the species name incorrectly on this values it should by Salix x sepulcralis (extra "r"), and what you have entered is best in the taxon key. The cultivar can be denominated separately by taxon:cultivar=Chrysocoma or 'Chrysocoma'
R0bst3r (2016-06-15 07:55:38+00:00): Chinese names to own tags, bad changes removed.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-25 14:49:51+00:00): Hello,
I don't quite understand why, if Beaconsfield Street is no longer accessible you've just removed the name?  
Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224093210/history still a cycleway?  Can you walk along it?  Is it still actually still called Beaconsfield Street?
Hope you don't mind me asking - just trying to help.
Cheers,
Andy
bovid (2016-09-25 17:33:10+00:00): Currently the street is a building site, inaccessible behind hoardings. When it reopens it might have a slightly different layout, I think.

The skip garden shown alongside it is now part of the same building site; the skip garden still exists , roughly below the words "Canal Reach".
SomeoneElse (2016-09-25 17:38:11+00:00): Thanks.  Does http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224093210/history need an "access=no" tag on it (or even deleting until the works are complete)?
bovid (2016-09-25 18:31:57+00:00): I've now marked it to show its inaccessibility.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-25 21:09:36+00:00): Great - thanks.  That should prevent people getting confused.
literan (2016-11-07 11:40:15+00:00): вандализм: зачем сдвинули дорогу на полкилометра? откатываю
philippec (2021-09-14 17:49:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2848772
literan (2016-06-13 12:32:19+00:00): вы уверены, что точка по продаже хотдогов носит название "На ТНК"?
var-alex (2016-06-13 17:50:34+00:00): Нет, она не носит имени. Это "кафе" на АЗС. Бутерброды и прочий фастфуд. Других идей как его обозначить мне в голову не пришло. Предложения и идеи принимаю.
literan (2016-06-14 19:44:05+00:00): тогда оставим поле name пустым, в этом нет ничего страшного. Кстати, эту заправку вскоре будут сносить, т.к. она стоит на пути строящейся развязки
var-alex (2016-06-17 16:50:45+00:00): Но если оставить поле пустым, то тогда, в поиске в разных программах она и будет отображаться без названия. Что не информативно.

Про то, что будет сноситься, то может и так, как снесут так снесут, но до этого успеют, скорее всего, люди попользоваться тегом ref ради которого я и рисую заправки.
literan (2016-06-18 16:09:32+00:00): Ну и что, есть множество объектов без названия. Давайте тогда каждому дому писать name=дом на n-ской улице в городе Х, а что, в поиске находится - и без названия
var-alex (2016-06-19 10:35:20+00:00): Действительно есть. Но пример с домом не к месту. Потому что обычно дома ищут по адресу. Да и собственно адрес является  отличным "именем" дома, если настоящего имени он не имеет. 
А если же человек ищет где перекусить, то точно без названия, в спике ему ничего не скажет, а что бы посмотреть что это надо перейти к карте и увидеть что сей фастфуд находится на заправке. Что долго и муторно. А программ, которые сами проинформируют тем или иным образом пользователя, о том что сей фастфуд (или магазинчик, что тоже актуально), находится на заправке нету. 
Так что считаю указание name меньшим из зол. Хотя может быть имеет смысл это указывать в description. Если он конечно показывается.
literan (2016-06-19 16:41:19+00:00): Рисовать под рендерер - один из главнейших грехов, вы же знаете. Я бы засунул в description
var-alex (2016-06-20 18:13:13+00:00): Согласен. Так и буду поступать. У меня еще мнооого заправок надо обозначить.
literan (2016-06-20 20:29:34+00:00): если не секрет - работаете в ТНК?
var-alex (2016-06-25 22:02:56+00:00): я? Не, я в транснефти. Жена работает в РН-Москва. От нее данные. refы не секретны, на каждой АЗ в документации и лейблах указаны. На видных местах может их и нет, но если документацию на АЗС попросить, вместе с сертефикатами на топливо, то там можно увидеть. Да и на меногоих, мелким шрифтом указаны на той табличке где время работы и т.п. 
Там же Роснефть и BP. Всё они одна сеть.
user_5359 (2016-06-11 17:41:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
kayle (2016-06-14 08:43:58+00:00): Zdravím, len jedna malá pripomienka k tejto úprave. To zdravotné stredisko je označené ako nemocnica čo nie najlepšie označenie. Odporučil by som amenity=clinic prípadne ešte amenity=doctors ak by to bolo čosi menšie, viď nasledovné odkazy.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dclinic

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Ddoctors

Ďakujem
kayle (2016-06-14 08:47:47+00:00): A ešte jedna :)
Tejto budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59382823 by bolo dobré prihodiť amenity=kindergarten aby to bolo brané ako škôlka.
Oskarst_ (2025-03-05 07:38:01+00:00): Hi,

There's a note related to a change you added many ears ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4237520295#map=17/9.489779/100.053064&layers=N). 

Link to the note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1463682#map=19/9.491245/100.056925&layers=N
dieterdreist (2016-06-22 15:37:50+00:00): this edit adds a housenumber to a whole building but in Italy every entrance gets its own housenumber.
zarl (2016-11-05 09:04:46+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine Ergänzungen und Korrekturen in OSM! 

Hier hast du einen Weg schon ganz prima (und nachvollziehbar mit Breitenangabe) als track statt vorher bridleway eingetragen, bei "track" lohnt sich (wie sonst auch) ein Blick ins Wiki, dort wird auch auf den ganz sinnvollen Zusatz tracktype verwiesen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype

Nur mal so als Hinweis für weitere Mapping-Aktivitäten.

Grüsse,
Zarl
marczoutendijk (2016-06-11 19:13:27+00:00): maps.me is niet geschikt om gegevens toe te voegen aan een bestaande adresnode. Dat had in dit geval wel moeten gebeuren. Ik heb het voor je aangepast. Lees ook mijn welkomstmail!
Commodoortje (2016-06-17 10:40:12+00:00): Grote Stern 215 is een gewone woning.
Er is een stuk verder oostelijk een supermarkt.
Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert wegens vandalisme. supermarkt is in werkelijkheid niet aanwezig, Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Hjart (2016-06-11 19:25:50+00:00): Er du sikker på at der er spærret lige der? På det her knap en måned gamle billede er der ikke nogen spærring at se.
Hjart (2016-06-11 19:26:02+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vh_1SlUvngda6x4i0Teoeg
citymapper42 (2016-06-11 19:27:28+00:00): Der er lukket pga. ombygning af Rødovre Centrum.
GerdP (2017-09-29 06:19:15+00:00): Hi!
Please review this area. I don't this that
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195138603
is a way as described here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus_guideway
If only busses are allowed, you can use
highway=service + access=no + bus=yes
Is it allowed to access the cinema 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155469789
via the south ends of fhis road? If yes, please split the road.
voschix (2021-09-18 17:08:14+00:00): Are you sure that way 424314422 is a power=cable (underground). I suspect this is in reality a power=line (on power poles)
gigi2037 (2021-09-18 18:05:43+00:00): Ciao penso che e come dici tu e una linea sui pali 5 anni fa ho usato il primo tag che ho trovato giusto
chihchun (2016-06-11 15:58:33+00:00): 1. 註解請盡量與修改一致。這裡編輯是玉山步道、註解是雙溪。
2. 還是要請您盡量用開放授權的圖資。謝謝。
SomeoneElse (2016-06-23 18:07:26+00:00): Any reason for the expansion of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424321516 to include the field to the west and the footpath to the right?  It's certainly not obvious from the road that it's this big - the previous size of the school area was based on what things look like from the road.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-23 18:09:50+00:00): I removed the made-up names "SPSP" on e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424321513 as well.  that was added by the previous (new) contributor; which I didn't fix straight away because I had let them know about it via a changeset discussion.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-06-26 05:29:05+00:00): There is/was a school sign on the roadside in the woods alongside the field, so I assumed the field belonged to the school. It could be they are just advertising the school on a field adjacent, I am happy to defer to local knowledge.
dsas (2020-07-04 11:29:23+00:00): The field is the schools sports field.
dsas (2020-07-04 12:00:22+00:00): The railway site is owned by chesterfield & district model engineering society, not the school. The drive does belong to the school.

See https://www.cdmes.co.uk/index.php/membership
ediyes (2016-06-24 16:38:26+00:00): Hola,

En este comentario tiene duplicidad de calles como esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423926207/history
Qué es lo que hiso?
ediyes (2016-06-13 19:07:03+00:00): 
Hi Joaquin

These streets exist?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364432366/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172023967/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77642813/history

I saw they don't match with satellite imagery.
sabas88 (2016-06-11 22:53:05+00:00): Ma é ciclabile quanto "il panoramico"? Perché su quello mi sono infognato, non era per niente ciclabile, almeno in salita :)
gian81 (2016-06-12 03:16:37+00:00): Il panoramico é ciclabile! Forse ti manca un po' la gamba :P 
Comunque il Sentiero per Nervi fino all'inizio del Tupango Alto é tutto pedalabile (occhio che in alcuni tratti é esposto). Il Tupango Alto invece è molto simile al Totem come terreno e curve ma molto meno ripido. 
Grazie per il commento è buon divertimento! Ci vediamo sui monti ;)
gian81 (2016-06-12 03:52:11+00:00): Ps: non avevo capito che il Panoramico lo facevi in salita, scusa!
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-25 11:06:59+00:00): What is supposed to be mapped here?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4237652989#map=18/52.86454/19.63560&layers=N - is there some live-action presentation how butter is made?
EneaSuper (2016-06-12 08:31:11+00:00): Il Fossato di Cicala lo si potrebbe aggiungere come località :)
marczoutendijk (2016-06-11 19:05:08+00:00): Lees mijn welkomstmail. Ik heb jouw edit iets aangepast. De amenity=school moet op het gebouw of het gebied van de school komen te staan. Dat kun je met maps.me niet goed voor elkaar krijgen.
Владимир К (2016-06-14 05:47:56+00:00): Здравствуйте! 
Вот вы правили дорожки в лесу. Не можете ли вы подсказать, там действительно велодорожки, где написано bicycle=yes? как на этой https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105328752
Владимир К (2016-06-14 05:49:12+00:00): или здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70847134/history#map=17/55.80947/37.96716
gtnh1201 (2016-06-14 07:12:51+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Там обычные грунтовые тропинки. Насчет первой ничего сказать не могу, по второй можно проехать на велосипеде не спешиваясь.
Peilscheibe (2016-06-12 16:54:17+00:00): In diesem Changeset wurden großflächig sachlich zutreffende Attribute gelöscht (lcn=yes); ich habe es daher rückgängig gemacht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 13:18:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1673469567/history has access:psv that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using psv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv ) be fitting at least equally well?
literan (2016-06-16 10:15:43+00:00): Получилось, что деревья растут в пруду. Для этого надо сделать мультиполигон, исключив пруд из полигона natural=wood. Я сделал, посмотрите
seav (2016-07-06 07:05:26+00:00): Are you really sure that the ramps at C-5-Bayani got changed?
seav (2016-07-24 02:17:31+00:00): I've partially reverted this changeset. The C-5-Bayani interchange was correct before.
BCNorwich (2016-07-25 17:49:49+00:00): Hi, a few of your ways are not tagged!
BCNorwich (2016-07-25 17:52:11+00:00): Forgot to say please see :- http://tinyurl.com/jf5amft
BCNorwich (2016-12-25 11:18:38+00:00): No reply so removed some untagged ways.