piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
optamed (2015-07-21 19:26:38+00:00): Übrigens ViennaGIS dürfte wohl auch nicht alle Daten korrekt führen. z.B. Freudenau 555 ist nicht der Reitstall in der Gärtnerstraße, sondern die Gösser Bierinsel (ca. 200m entfernt).
zimba (2015-07-21 22:57:00+00:00): Stimmt, die offiziellen daten haben auch manchmal fehler, sind aber oft ein guter startpunkt.
Hausnummern sind nummern von Haeusern, nicht von Wegen, deshalb braucht man sie nicht zu verschieben. Da das ganze adressthema wohl schneller gezeigt als erklaert ist, habe ischt schnell die ganze kleingartenanlage reingeklopft. Bitte nicht von der darstellung auf der karte verwirren lassen, es wird leider nur "addr:housenumber" und nicht noch zusaetzlich "addr:unit" angezeigt.
lg
kartler175 (2015-07-28 13:10:32+00:00): Ich möchte dir dringend ans Herz legen, für die Bearbeitung von MP einen geeigneten Editor zu verwenden. iD ist es offensichtlich nicht: 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=11.88949&lat=46.89757&zoom=14&baselayer=GeofabrikStandard&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=12.09741&lat=46.76404&zoom=14&baselayer=GeofabrikStandard&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags
softcake (2015-07-30 05:24:30+00:00): Danke für die Info. Hab's korrigiert.
LC Ximenes (2015-07-23 02:27:43+00:00): Parabéns pela adição de todas as paradas de ônibus de Fortaleza.
narceliodesa (2015-07-23 03:22:21+00:00): Obrigado Ximenes. Mas temos que verificar o posicionamento de algumas, visto que o arquivo da ETUFOR não é 100% preciso. Assim como temos que ter uma atenção para o mapeamento do sistema BRT da Bezerra de Meneses
Skippern (2015-07-24 18:39:22+00:00): Desculpa, mas nao vejo esse importação documentado ou discutido com o comunidade. Favor participar com o comunidade Brasileiro, e discutir esses tipos do importações com o comunidade antes que executar. Pode ser pelo lista talk-br@openstreetmap.org, pelo forum http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=74 ou no pagina próprio no wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fortaleza ou http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ceará
naoliv (2015-07-24 18:44:37+00:00): Narcélio, legal que você está inserindo estes dados. Só que tem alguns poréns: como foi apenas uma importação direta, alguns pontos ficaram duplicados com os que já existiam. Precisaria verificar isso antes.
Apesar de fornecido pela prefeitura, os dados possuem permissão de uso? Eu desconfio que de alguma forma eles foram gerados pela prefeitura utilizando as imagens do Google para isso (o que, a princípio, poderia tornar isso um trabalho derivado do Google).
Skippern (2015-07-24 19:55:28+00:00): Também, antes fazer importações, e bom ler esses paginas e fazer os deveres necessários, importações não em acordo com esse pode ser revertidos: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Import http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Import/Guidelines http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Handling_bad_imports http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
Skippern (2015-07-29 17:05:22+00:00): Tudo esse importação fui revertido no https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32961012
Voce e livre refazer o importação depois um discussão com o comunidade Brasileiro no um das formas apresentado em cima, em conforme com as procedimentos do importação do OSM. Se ha duvidas ou pergunta sobre esse procedimento, entre em contato.
norwini (2017-09-10 13:49:19+00:00): Hi,
koennen wir die Region `Sommerrodelbahn` (3658074474) loeschen oder nicht als `place:region` taggen? Sie wird in maps.me gleichwertig mit anderen Regionen wie Regierungsbezirke etc gerendert, noch vor Ortsnamen wie Monschau.
Lodda (2017-09-12 20:56:47+00:00): Habe von Region auf locality gesetzt
SomeoneElse (2015-07-20 23:11:20+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361314624 a new-build road (it doesn't exist on the Bing imagery and isn't on OS_OpenData_StreetView either)?  Is it really a tertiary road with a 20mph speed limit?  That seems an unusual combination.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-20 11:18:50+00:00): Dzięki za poprawienie mrówek w Gubinie.
Skippern (2015-07-19 23:13:15+00:00): Esse edificio, e vendas ou empresarial? Voce misturando landuse=retail (comercial/vendas) com building=comercial (comercial/empresarial). Isso e principalmente escritórios ou principalmente lojas?
rantanplan41 (2015-07-19 23:16:47+00:00): Exatamente. É um edifício comercial com um shopping nos andares inferiores, ou seja, são as duas coisas. 

Não há uma atividade predominante. Há escritórios e lojas.
Skippern (2015-07-19 23:22:08+00:00): mas o tag landuse e usado errado mesmo, esse tag e para um area, por exemplo o quarteirão. Melhor tira o landuse, e deixa somente o building. Se ha lojas no primeiro andar so, e escritórios em cima eu acho building=comercial e certo como o atividade principal seja empresarial.
Eu ainda nao sei um forma certo para mapear muitos atividades dentro um edifício so, mas credito que o node voce criou para o empresa que ja tem mapeado por dentro deve ser certa. Se voce pode identificar os outros empresas tambem sera bom
rantanplan41 (2015-07-19 23:27:15+00:00): Compreendo. Então acho que você está correto. Olhando por este lado, é comercial building (que acaba englobando lojas também).

Pergunto: e nos casos em que há 3 atividades? Como escritórios, lojas e hotel? Há empreendimentos assim...
Skippern (2015-07-19 23:31:03+00:00): Ha hotel também? Nunca vi placa hotel nesse altura da Reta.

Tranquilo, hotel pode coexistir tranquilamente com os outros atividades, basta adicionar tourism=hotel
AVBR (2015-07-19 19:40:41+00:00): There are a couple of outlines here that I'm not sure if they are buildings, would someone else have a look?
Skippern (2015-07-19 20:11:18+00:00): Esse banco ja estou no mapa, voce so duplicando os dados criando esse no, favor copiar esses dados dentro o poligono do edifício, que ja tava mapeada como banco CEF. Também o bandeira do banco (Caixa Economica) nem deve aparecer no nome nem operador, mas no etiqueta brand (bandeira)
rantanplan41 (2015-07-19 20:18:36+00:00): Compreendo, mas o polígino não é o banco, e sim o edifício onde se encontra a loja onde hoje funciona o banco. O polígono é o Ed. Century Towers...
Skippern (2015-07-19 20:30:35+00:00): Se o edificio tem outro funciones a mapear alem do banco pode tirar o informação do banco do polígono, mas adicionar todos os informação do endereços que voce tem no node do banco.
O nome do edificio deve ser coloquado como addr:housename=Edificio Century Towers (sem abreviacao.
rantanplan41 (2015-07-19 20:32:37+00:00): Maravilha! Abs!
Sanniu (2017-04-28 15:37:41+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175697955 have no tag, is it street?
Jojo4u (2015-11-11 22:24:41+00:00): Hallo Recopolis, da ist beim Mappen wohl etwas schief gelaufen, kein Problem!
Momentan überlagern sich zwei Wege: In den Gerteisen und der Mühlweg. Außerdem ist ersters nicht an der Leonbergerger Str. angeschlossen. Möchtest du ausdrücken dass In den Gerteisen für jeden befahrbar ist (unclassified)? 

LG Joachim
SomeoneElse (2025-05-26 09:21:59+00:00): Are you sure that the size values for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3658274203 are correct?
circumference=0.04 and height=12 are plausible for a Silver Birch, but diameter_crown=77 is 6 times wider than it's high - unlikely for a Silver Birch, and unlikely to be supported by that 4cm-wide trunk
ivanbranco (2025-06-09 23:01:28+00:00): I noticed other weird values while looking at Acer platanoides trees:

https://www.osm.org/node/3658207772
according to monumentaltrees.com (https://www.monumentaltrees.com/en/trees/acerplatanoides/records/) the tallest Acer platanoides is 37.90m, this one is 40m. Maybe OSM data is correct, who knows. But I would expect at least a denotation=landmark/natural_monument in such case.

https://www.osm.org/node/3658215307
This Acer platanoides is tall 12m and has a circumference of 0.04, having a height/circumference ratio of 300 (the biggest value in the database for this species). The average circumference for other trees of the same species with the same height is above 1m.
ivanbranco (2026-02-28 22:17:28+00:00): After a year, this time looking at Aesculus hippocastanus trees for my nerdy tree statistics: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ivanbranco&oldid=2958848

I noticed this tree: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3658154622

this tree is 25m tall but its girth is only 0.02. Maybe it was supposed to be 2 instead? I wonder how we can fix all these errors, I see the import author is not active anymore.
ivanbranco (2026-03-04 22:45:30+00:00): species="Fraxinus excelsior" today. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3658160942

25 m tall but only 0.04 girth. Again, could be 4 m girth in reality? I'm starting to think that all circumference values added by these user should be multiplied by 100, but after 10 years I'm not sure how to find them.
ivanbranco (2026-03-04 23:29:37+00:00): Ok, I’ve just checked this tree in the original source data. In the latest version, its circumference is 1.80. At this point, I don’t know where those other values came from.
ivanbranco (2026-03-04 23:36:39+00:00): … but it was actually “4” in the 2015 dataset, while the other values appear to be correct. I assume the dataset contained some errors, so there’s no way to detect them organically. Since the identifiers seem to have remained the same, they could be used to update the trees with the latest data. That’s outside my capabilities, so I’ll just correct the anomalous values I come across when possible.

Sorry for the many comments. Bye, and happy mapping.
ivanbranco (2026-03-04 23:48:54+00:00): Sorry, me again… I just noticed that the license of that dataset is CC BY 4.0. I’m wondering how it was imported 10 years ago in the first place. I couldn't find any information in the wiki and in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue.
GeorgeKaplan (2023-09-01 21:03:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1997949923 réouvert depuis ?
literan (2015-07-20 10:35:02+00:00): Приветствую! crossing_ref=zebra использовать не следует, т.к. это классификация переходов в Великобритании (кроме зебр, там много других животных), и к нашей "зебре" ни малейшего отношения не имеет!!! Удаляю.
Gazer75 (2015-07-21 11:50:52+00:00): Waste of time to do any coastline edits with Bing in Norway. They are being updated slowly by better data from Norwegian Mapping Authority. Bing is also not adviced to use much in Norway as its often badly georeferenced.
Hjart (2015-07-21 13:30:56+00:00): I agree . In Norway using Bing alone is not a good idea, since it is often 30-100 m off and  you can't even expect it to be equally much off anywhere. You really need to consult the gps layers and Strava heatmaps http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava wherever available.
Durko_freemap (2015-07-20 13:11:20+00:00): Zdravim, Sladkovicova 19 sem na garaz urcite nepatri, vymazte prosim tie tagy. Dakujem.
Jojo4u (2015-07-21 17:15:20+00:00): Wollte nur ping geben dass ich die Torstraße zu unclassified gändert habe.
Die Straße hat absolut nicht den Charakter einer Anliegerstraße (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attributierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland#Anliegerstra.C3.9Fe) hat. Auch innerorts ist unclassified erlaubt. Hier herrscht viel Verkehr der quasi im Kreis fährt.
MKnight (2015-09-06 09:34:44+00:00): was soll "Sp" sein? Sonntag? Geöffnet oder geschlossen?
Jose Riha (2015-07-21 08:28:01+00:00): uff, to fakt maju v galante dvojpismenove oznacenia domov? 10AS, 10AT..
aceman444 (2015-07-26 19:06:46+00:00): Netusim, ja som ich nevidel. Ak su objekty s tymito cislami v tomto changesete, tak som asi na nich menil nieco ine. Myslim, ze adresy v Galante nahraval Durko, skuste u neho, ci ich ma v jeho zdroji (myslim, ze mestsky urad).
Jose Riha (2015-07-26 19:47:33+00:00): ano, mate pravdu, durka som uz oslovil a je to zoznamom. uz tam mam vyslaneho spiona, ktory to preveri. dakujem
Adela Švončinárová (2023-04-30 17:45:03+00:00): hehe spiona:D pekne, takich potrebujeme:D
aceman444 (2023-08-11 15:50:18+00:00): Ale aj by som tomu veril, Galanta je v tomto smere specificka, maju orientacne cisla aj na kazdej garazi (neviem preco) a preto im niekedy uz mohli dojst cisla.
virgilinojuca (2016-01-03 08:16:37+00:00): Olá, moacirbmn. Notei, através da camada Cycle Map, a criação de relações de ciclorrotas locais (route=bicycle, network=lcn). Como você não colocou tag source em suas relations nem na sua edição, gostaria de pergutá-lo qual é a fonte dessas informações, já que desconheço qualquer regulamentação oficial de ciclorrotas em Belém.
GerdP (2015-10-17 06:10:32+00:00): please review:
Bing shows very nice roads here
DannyAiquipa (2015-10-17 20:55:05+00:00): Hello , thanks for your review,  i changed this tag ,  please review this changeset 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34701334.
Greetings
Danny
GerdP (2015-10-17 21:10:39+00:00): thanks for the reply. I think surface is
asphalt, not grass?
DannyAiquipa (2015-10-20 15:52:42+00:00): Hello,  I changed this tag , see this changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34758569
5m4u9 (2015-07-22 04:36:04+00:00): buena edición... tomar en cuenta que pollos son comida rápida (fast food) y no restaurantes (creo que se puede contar con las manos los únicos restaurantes que sirven pollo).

Los monumentos en realidad son estatuas (amenity=artwork + artwork_type=statue). Tenemos muy pocos monumentos históricos acá.
gscholz (2018-04-16 04:49:59+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created osm errors regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-66.16899&lat=-17.37734&zoom=18&opacity=0.71&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
ace24 (2015-07-20 01:35:45+00:00): fixing pineridge roads
ftrebien (2017-05-29 16:16:17+00:00): O bairro Chapéu do Sol foi criado pela lei 6893/1991 e alterado pela lei 11058/2011. O bairro Lageado foi criado pela lei 7155/1992. Ambos constam também na lei de bairros recentemente aprovada 12112/2016. Vou remover o fixme adicionado a esses bairros quando implementar a nova lei.
literan (2018-06-23 12:46:46+00:00): Добрый день. А эти парковки вокруг стадиона так и не ввели в эксплуатацию (я вижу, на проездах стоит highway=construction)?
luiswoo (2018-06-23 14:25:20+00:00): День добрый. Тут временные сооружения для проведения чемпионата. Два верхних участка будут парковками. Нижний — или парковка, либо спорт-комплекс.
https://yadi.sk/a/_eti7qiN3TASZC
literan (2018-06-23 15:43:12+00:00): Будут - в смысле, после Чемпионата?
luiswoo (2018-06-23 16:21:02+00:00): Да. По ссылке один из проектов.
carciofo (2015-10-05 13:37:48+00:00): Please be more careful next time with unfinished dual carriageways. You left a long segment of Lyons Road with oneway=yes without a corresponding way in the opposite direction.
Seandebasti (2015-10-31 11:17:40+00:00): which one exactly, did you fix it? would be nice if you can point it when you commit something . because i dont see what you mean if you do not point it. thx
Seandebasti (2015-10-31 11:30:34+00:00): and actually did you know that the carriageways are abandoned, so please fix it the right way
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Dual_carriageways
carciofo (2015-10-17 16:01:47+00:00): Hi, regarding the tags highway=turning_circle and highway=turning_loop in this commit, please note the difference: turning_loop has a non-transversable island, while turning_loop has no non-transversable island. It seems you've got these two mixed up since they were applied here opposite to their meaning. Thanks.
carciofo (2015-10-17 16:03:11+00:00): Oops, that should read of course: "while turning_circle has no non-transversable island". See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=turning_circle and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop
Seandebasti (2015-10-31 11:05:36+00:00): thx for commiting, I realized this problem too, because other mappers did add the wrong tag. I thought I did it right here, do you have a specific area here?
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2015-07-20 09:26:16+00:00): Доброго времени суток! Я по поводу назначения значимости дорог.

Вы всегда помечаете дороги вдоль дачных участков как служебные проезды. С моей точки зрения, лучше ставить тег дороги местного значения либо же жилой улицы (при наличии соответствующего знака; в подтверждение — существуют люди, которые постоянно живут на дачах), а "служебный проезд" оставлять только для коротких тупиковых дорог.

Если Вы считаете моё мнение неверным, либо же существует специальное правило для обозначения таких дорог, просьба меня с ними ознакомить.

Спасибо за внимание.
D-I (2015-07-20 13:04:45+00:00): Добрый день!
Так это Вы исправили, а я думал, что я пропустил) Дачи в основном объединены в кооперативы, обнесены заборами, бывает что и въезды только по пропускам, улицы не широкие, как в жилой части города или поселка.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dresidential -дороги, которые проходят вокруг и между жилых зон. Немного не согласен что дачи жилая зона. Летом там могут проживать люди, но если зимой никто не живет, будет ли она считаться жилой? Менять ли тег улицы от времени года и количества временно проживающих? Тогда бы правильнее было часть домов где живут люди обозначать тегом landuse=residential, а где обрабатываемые участки  landuse=allotments
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dallotments - Именованные улицы highway=residential , в садовых товариществах именуют улицы номерами, но как по мне тег  highway=service более отвечает их основной функции, а именно подъезд к участку.
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2015-07-20 17:07:49+00:00): В это случае не могу не согласиться. Но всё же считаю, что для длинных таких проездов в больших дачных кооперативах лучше использовать тег highway=residential.
kcwu (2015-09-19 08:27:15+00:00): 湖子「内」還是「內」?
malenki (2015-07-25 08:54:31+00:00): Diese destruktive Änderung habe ich rückgängig gemacht. 
Bitte achte darauf, dass deine nächsten Bearbeitungen sinnvoller ausfallen!
GerdP (2015-10-29 20:12:07+00:00): please review node 1094739489:
highway=p seems to mean highway=stop?
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
Skippern (2015-07-20 11:50:09+00:00): Why are you inserting hungarian name (name:hu) when it is no different than the generic name?
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
dk_hk (2015-07-24 17:54:54+00:00): Dear OSMF Data Working Group Members,

Datakart Ltd provides GIS services in Hungary. Our clients use OSM
maps as a base layer. They want to see the hungarian names of the map
content. We help them for free to get a better map content.

We are planning, that the user dk_hk will add a large amount of
name:hu tags to objects around the world in the next few weeks. We
have the local knowledge to add this names. All of as are geographers.
The data source is a lectured: "Geographic Atlas for schools" by
Cartographia, 2014.

Best regards,
Zalán Novák
GIS solutions
Datakart Ltd.
naoliv (2015-07-24 18:09:30+00:00): Please, don't do this before discussing.
naoliv (2015-07-24 18:11:45+00:00): You also should be aware that in case a "name:hu" (or any other language) isn't available, you should fallback to "name" only (and not just start adding "name:hu" with the exactly same content as "name").
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-20 09:19:55+00:00): Poprawny sposób tagowania adresów: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
SomeoneElse (2015-07-21 17:56:53+00:00): Hi - thanks for fixing.
4rch (2015-07-20 12:15:20+00:00): Hello comandant3, as I've already mentioned, please don't make political motivated edits which do break administrative boundaries. 

If you have found a boundary which doesn't reflect the situation on the ground, then please start a discussion, for example at the talk mailinglist: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
or at the forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=10

You can also contact the Data Working Group: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

If your edits regarding boundaries should continue, I'd have to ask the Data Working Group to block you. I've reverted the edits which you've made today.

Regards, 4rch

Please read also my previous comment: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32697031
literan (2017-12-20 10:09:30+00:00): по поводу вот этого съезда - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334823145/history - интересно ,а к чему тогда относится знак "только прямо" вот тут http://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=10&ll=37.49543211498552%2C55.82182095709967&pa=20.2&pp=37.4954371%2C55.82181795 ?? Я на днях там проезжал - знак на месте
iWowik (2017-12-21 06:43:06+00:00): пакет правок двухлетней давности.
GerdP (2015-11-14 18:28:41+00:00): please review:
what is meant with surface=1 ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361392131
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361391310
*Martin* (2021-08-09 20:08:55+00:00): ten "Huculský chodník" je divne tagovany - colour vravi yellow, osmc:symbol blue. V useko ktory som presiel som nasiel iba jednu znacku - zlty stvorec v bielom ramiku.
Peter Vojtek (2021-08-10 13:44:36+00:00): vdaka za opravu. ktovie co som vtedy pred 7 rokmi videl, zial este som vtedy nefotil.
*Martin* (2021-08-11 07:27:18+00:00): no ja som ju povodne chcel dat pod namespace abandoned lebo bez mapy sa najst neda :-)