piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-08-21 04:44:08+00:00): Dzięki! Takie uwagi tworzę zamiast poprawy w sytuacjach gdy znajdę kilka problemów równocześnie. Np gdy znajduje problem podczas poprawiania innego problemu.

Na ogół je poprawiam, ale nie zawsze mi to wychodzi.
Mike Raust (2020-08-26 15:03:32+00:00): Why have you deleted the ways?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=89695943
Tusculum (2020-08-26 19:26:30+00:00): Hi Mike, thanks for reaching out. I removed the two river features that extended past the riverbank (www.openstreetmap.org/way/267234143) to create a cleaner transition from river to lake.
Supaplex (2020-08-20 14:30:05+00:00): 不好意思，你建築的點也加上 tag 了，一般情況大概只會用在標示出入口。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89695975
ESVL (2020-08-20 22:00:15+00:00): 我有注意到誤標記到點上，感謝提醒！
Frans S (2020-08-21 11:34:31+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mappings are a far from accurate. Sorry to say so.
See this web page with the modifications I had to made
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=89743084
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-08-20 14:34:36+00:00): Hola.
Gracias por hacer un mapa aquí
Una petición.
Por favor, no haga un mapa de los edificios conectados entre sí. Mapearlos individualmente...
Yo invalido esta tarea para que usted pueda corregirla...
Hola. 
Hello.
Thanks for mapping here
A request.
Please don't map buildins connected to each other . Map them individual
I invalidate this task so that you can correct it
Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
cquest (2020-08-23 13:35:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2441896 has been deleted but not replaced yet by better landuse. Why not.
Do you plan to improve it soon ?
If not, please leave existing landuse or improve it by steps is a better approach.
Merci :)
cquest (2020-08-24 13:31:37+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89859713

Which import do you plan ? Are you aware of OSM import rules ?
Import as first contributions to OSM is unusual (and not recommended).
Mashin (2020-08-20 19:19:31+00:00): Can you specify what things were "listed incorrectly" and what does it mean? 
All those roads still clearly show on satellite imagery.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:44:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89697285
aceman444 (2021-10-16 22:32:32+00:00): Zdravim, z coho vyplyva maxspeed=30 na ceste Na Straník v lese? Je tam taka dopravna znacka?
lubosb (2021-10-17 05:40:54+00:00): Zdravím,

v tej dobe (rok dozadu) značka.
Frans S (2020-08-21 10:43:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please do not map a complete block of buildings and call it 1 building.
Your mappings are a bit below par.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
stephankn (2020-09-29 06:23:32+00:00): you claim to edit in Lao PDR, but this is in the middle of Thailand. Also tagging service roads a tertiary (way 839053969) to make them more visible is not acceptable. Please stop doing such edits as part of your covid campaign. You are always welcome to contact the community in the forum if you have an interest in mapping according to the OSM community standards. We certainly help you soing it right. If you continue with such systematic bad edits, we will revert what you and your colleagues have broken.
osmviborg (2020-08-20 15:32:45+00:00): Hvad har 'Butik Holmsland' gjort dig?
parsd51 (2020-08-20 15:58:11+00:00): Hej osmviborg

Jeg fandt ved hurtig søgning ikke en butik med det navn, men du har ret, der er faktisk en. 
Den beskrives som: Bolig & Indretning  Legetøjsbutik  Hobbyforretning 
Jeg tænker give den tag shop interior_decoration, som mit bedste bud.

Har du et forslag?

Hilsen
parsd51
parsd51 (2020-08-20 16:22:40+00:00): .. og tak fordi du opdagede fejlen :-)
trigpoint (2020-08-21 12:02:05+00:00): Hi Ron
I hav corrected the syntax for the collection times. In the editor if you click i next to the value it will guide you to the explanation of how to add them. Basically two letter day code and 24 hour clock time.
Durko_freemap (2020-08-21 08:47:01+00:00): Ahoj, no popravde tieto zakreslene zmeny narobili viac skody ako osohu. Idealne by bolo vratit vsetky zmeny spet a potom by si znova zakreslil po mensich davkach to co si chcel zmenit. Zakreslovanie do mapy ma svoje pravidla, tu si zakreslil cyklotrasu nad cyklotrasu+cestu, (fakt len vzorka, lebo je ich viac, napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839058908#map=17/49.26707/20.84383, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/816089913#map=17/49.26707/20.84383). Nerozumiem preco si potreboval zakreslit cyklotrasu uz na zakreslenu cyklotrasu. Zjednodusene: Ak je povodna zle tak ju oprav, ale netahaj nove ciary uz na zakreslene ciary. Ovplyvnene cyklotrasy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11164190#map=12/49.3092/20.8610, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2150561#map=13/49.3190/20.9001, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2150534#map=14/49.2957/20.8643.
Pockam na odpoved ci suhlasis s revertom (vratit zmeny). Dik Durko.
aceman444 (2020-11-01 20:58:38+00:00): Fakt riadny neporiadok s tou cyklocestou. Dokonca vymazal cele potoky a nazvy oblasti.
aceman444 (2020-11-02 23:37:03+00:00): Pipleme sa tu s cyklotrasou a posedmi v lese, ale ze tu chyba cela cast obce Orlov (Andrejovka), to nikomu nechyba :) Ved len 50 domov. Doplnil som.
Inak mozno uz treba odstranit len tu cyklotrasu, lebo tie vymazane potoky v jazerach uz niekto iny doplnil a aspon nam ostanu tie posedy ak sa to nerevertne cele.
aceman444 (2020-11-04 19:26:08+00:00): Vidim, ze autor neodpoveda, ale potichu niektore opravy urobil, aj ked nekompletne. Niektore tie jeho problemy opravili ini, aj ciastocne tu cyklocestu. Uz to ani nepojde revertnut. Takze odstrelim zbytky tej duplicitnej cyklocesty a sme tu hotovi.
aceman444 (2020-11-04 20:27:39+00:00): Dobre, upratal som to. Kfzeha, nie je potrebne vsetko nasilne menit na highway=cycleway (teda cyklochodnik/cestuicka pre cyklistov). Znacena cyklotrasa moze prechadzat aj po inych typoch ciest, polnych cestach, uliciach, aj cestach tretej triedy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11164190#map=13/49.3068/20.8275&layers=C . Cyklotrasa sa vyjadruje relaciou, teda akymsi usporiadanym zoskupenim ciest po ktorych prechadza. Pokial som mal moznost vidiet, cyklotrasa bola v poriadku a hotova aj pred Vasim zasahom. No ale aspon okolie Orlova dostalo zasadne vylepsenia, par dni som na tom stravil:) Majte sa.
Frans S (2020-08-21 08:45:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Your mappings are a bit below par.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-08-20 15:31:33+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping 
Please read the 'how to map tall" buildings in attached document
Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Olga | Yanosik (2020-10-05 13:23:18+00:00): Cześć, postawienie na drodze wysepki otagowanej access=no spowodowało, że nawigacja nie prowadzi tą drogą. Nie tylko Yanosik ale też OSMR. Tylko GraphHooper daje radę. Pozwolę sobie usunąć ten access=no. 
Pozdrowienia
trigpoint (2020-08-21 10:22:14+00:00): What do you mean by Postcode Directory?

Please remember that postcode are copyright and we have to be squeaky clean about only using opendata sources. We are absolutely not allowed to copy from Royal Mail.

Cheers Phil
seattlefyi (2020-08-21 02:51:27+00:00): Thanks for the change! It looks correct. Also, that you added the webpage was helpful too! Hope to see more edits.
RicoElectrico (2021-01-24 13:59:14+00:00): Hej, podany przez Ciebie numer telefonu do szpitala chyba nie jest aktualny wg strony (albo przynajmniej ja go nie widziałem tam). Sprawdziłbyś? 

Dodatkowo powinno to być +48 32, a nie +32 - ktoś mógłby dokonać kosztownej pomyłki...
zuicz (2021-01-24 14:43:22+00:00): Już poprawiam!
jqngarcia (2020-08-21 06:41:40+00:00): Buenos dias, Alvaro, si modificas, cortas, o estiras calles, ya existentes, vigila con la lineas de bus que pasan, tu modificación en la Avenida Generalitat de SCG, ha afectado a mas de 15 lineas.
Salud y Mapas, JQN
user_5359 (2020-08-22 06:02:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
peregrination (2020-08-24 22:19:19+00:00): Thanks for the extra note tags. I've noticed that the new Kidbrooke + Fulham Riverside developments are using the same kind of covered parkings.
spiregrain (2020-08-25 20:37:24+00:00): Some of the Chobham Manor ones have it too.  I suspect this is our life now.   Pity osm.org doesn't put a bit of green on roof gardens.
Frans S (2020-08-21 10:51:00+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Mike Raust (2020-08-22 13:39:01+00:00): Hi navosm,

what exactly have you changed here?
trigpoint (2020-08-21 10:14:57+00:00): Please stop duplicating information that is already mapped. The university details are already on the campus object. There is no need to duplicate that information on the building.
Also rather than delete the newsagent it is better to change it to disused:shop=newsagent, this stops it rendering but preserves the history when the premises become something else.

Cheers Phil
Frans S (2020-08-21 11:44:51+00:00): 
Hello. Thank you for mapping out this project.
Due to a problem in iDeditor, many buildings/roads are currently drawn double or triple.
Cause is an error in IDeditor which causes the already drawn buildings to remain invisible.
Note the bottom line in iDeditor. There's a blue field in there that says ... If you have hidden objects, you need to zoom in further. It may happen that the field does not disappear.  Then find another task to work on.

See this picture
![hidden features] (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yoGFziHyq49yKKqKbu81mefyBQZ6TqPH/view?usp=sharing)
Cebderby (2020-08-20 23:09:12+00:00): Too many problems with this edit:
Node dragged and joined to remote area.  False connections added between ways correctly mapped as being at different levels, or unconnected like underground lines passing over each other.  Layer 1 and -1 values added seemingly at random to some buildings and ways.  Some features moved to match unaligned Bing imagery.  To protect the integrity of the map, this has been reverted.  Changes are visible at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=89701444
if there are brand: or addr: additions which are useful to be re-applied.  False way connection and realignment will be reverted.
user_10149683 (2020-08-21 05:19:07+00:00): Which is the best imagery?
Cebderby (2020-08-21 09:52:22+00:00): For sharpness, absence of shadows, verticality, the new Bing imagery is possibly the best imagery we have ever had.  Just align it to the map.  The problem is not the imagery.

The issues here are false connection of ways and nodes which are not intended to be connected.  There may be few people relying on OSM in Pontefract or even Wakefield for foot and public transport navigation, but there are likely to be thousands doing so in central London.  False connections cannot be tolerated.  One footway you added in one of the edits connected in sequence: a surface road - underground track - underground platform - another surface road - a lift inside a building - the adjacent lift - a tunnel footway.  By connecting these with a footway you are saying there is a route (and step free so potentially wheelchair accessible) directly from each of these to the next.  And different underground tracks might all happen to have layer=-3 and cross each other, eg because the mappers don't know which is above the the other.  This does not mean that the tracks should be connected.  Connecting footways etc carefully mapped passing over each other with different layers is just bad.

And the apparent approach to try to clear highlighted 'issues' by the easiest/first means possible, eg putting a layer value on one or other is very very bad.  Layer is generally not a tag for buildings.  Negative layer on ways generally means underground eg in tunnel under another way, positive elevated eg on bridge over another way.  Sometimes ways do cross building boundaries, especially in cities with complicated 3d shapes.  The map is better with the so-called 'issues' left in place than with guessed fixes applied.
Try to map in areas you know, aim to make the map a useful (eg think of road, foot, cycle,public transport routing) simplified (eg don't add footways which are actually just ordinary sidewalks) representation of the reality, rather than attempting to fix 'issues'.  Trying to fix 'issues' in areas you do not know is often damaging, not beneficial.
Cebderby (2020-08-20 23:10:00+00:00): Too many problems with this edit:
False connections added between ways correctly mapped as being at different levels, or unconnected like underground lines passing over each other, including false level crossings.  Layer 1 and -1 values added seemingly at random to some buildings and ways.  Some features moved to match unaligned Bing imagery.  To protect the integrity of the map, this has been reverted.  Changes are visible at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=89701458
if there are brand: or addr: additions which are useful to be re-applied.  False way connection and realignment will be reverted.
Mantazzo (2020-08-20 16:17:30+00:00): Dėl A9 kelio remonto atkarpos - informacija atvirai prieinama eismoinfo.lt tinklapyje; o jei reikia JSON formatu - http://restrictions.eismoinfo.lt/. Tikiuosi, panaudojau tinkamą apribojimą - po trumpos Google paieškos radau, kad šis formatas (conditional) tinkamiausias trumpalaikiams darbams.
Jrachi (2020-08-26 10:06:54+00:00): Scusa... ma che razza di gpx inutile hai usato come fonte?
Non puoi inserire una simile traccia e taggarla track, sembra di più ad una traccia fatta da un velivolo (che finisce in avvitamento prima di schiantarsi)
skquinn (2020-09-07 23:26:06+00:00): Again, a changeset comment of "updates" is completely devoid of useful information. Instead, this should be commented with something like: Adjust alignment of parking areas and fountain; add grass areas
Michael Bonanno (2020-08-27 16:47:28+00:00): this change is a "college prank". User account is probably a disposable prank account
sa10cin (2020-08-27 19:59:43+00:00):  No this is not a disposable account
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:43:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89703158
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:43:55+00:00): can you check the farmland
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89703158
GeorgeKaplan (2023-08-03 11:07:45+00:00): Bonjour PhQ,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7830133675/history#map=16/45.5234/3.7079&layers=N , c'est vraiment comme ça sur le terrain ?
PhQ (2023-08-03 13:44:57+00:00): Non, ca a été vandalisé, il n'en reste que des debris
GeorgeKaplan (2025-01-05 08:43:44+00:00): J'ai raté votre réponse, désolé.
Je voulais dire : on a vraiment eu un calvaire pastafariste ici ?
DoctorSpeck (2020-08-27 06:41:53+00:00): Hi, This change caused multiple features to be deleted. For now I have reverted these changes, Please ensure that your edits to not unnecessarily delete features that still exist.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89703643
Frans S (2020-08-21 08:44:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Your mappings are a bit below par.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
msevilla00 (2020-08-20 21:59:05+00:00): Hola StreetZGZ, creo que te equivocas al cambiar los Pinares de Venecia como parque.
Es un área forestal.
Puedes ver en la wiki que es exactamente un leisure=park
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en
Voy a revertir el cambio.
Un saludo
Miguel
StreetZGZ (2020-08-21 09:19:33+00:00): Hola miguel. No toda la zona se considera ya asi. Hay partes que han cambiado. Y no dejais separar trozos o partes. Hay muchas zonas que ponéis como wikipedia que no son tales zonas. Conseguí en su dia separarlo y lo volvéis a poner como zona forestal cuando hay trozos que son zonas de parque por el amor de Dios. Ayer no podia ya poner ese trozo separado. Que no es todo pinares de venecia por Dios. Ni todo zona forestal.
StreetZGZ (2020-08-21 09:20:59+00:00): No podéis basar todo en base de wikipedias desactualizadas
msevilla00 (2020-08-24 14:07:04+00:00): Siento haberte molestado.
Estoy totalmente de acuerdo con que hay áreas que pueden estar consideradas parque (aquellas que tengan instalaciones y estén más cercanas al área urbana). Se pueden dividir y aplicarles esa etiqueta. Haz una propuesta y la vemos juntos. Pero considerar toda la totalidad como parque. No, no lo veo.
La wiki de OSM es la base sobre la que trabajar. Eres bienvenido a debatir sobre el tema en la comunidad.
Un saludo
StreetZGZ (2020-08-24 14:30:21+00:00): Es que no se editar la wiki. Te he marcado como parque la zona esa que te digo. Es un trozo muy pequeño. Pero ya lo separe bien en su dia y alguien lo quitó...y claro hacer modificaciones para que luego te las quiten...pues entre e igual sin querer marque toda la zona forestal como parque y en ese aspecto tienes toda la razón tu. Pero el trozo ese donde estan todo el circuito puntos de ejercicio es la parte a la que yo me refiero.
msevilla00 (2020-08-24 20:55:14+00:00): Pues es que resulta que cambiaste el conjunto de la relación que engloba todos los pinares y eso, claro está, no es correcto. Si lo que quieres es solo marcar un área en concreto deberas de realizar una nueva relación y definir allí que eso si que es parque. Desde aquí no soy capaz de saber qué área es exctamente. Pon URL con zoom a la zona y te ayudamos a editarlo.
Un saludo
msevilla00 (2020-08-24 20:57:29+00:00): Ah! y respecto a editar la wiki, primero hay que ver que quieres cambiar pues hay que consensuar los cambios allí también. Te animo a que te nos unas a la comunidad y comentes con nosotros allí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a#contacto
pio2_122 (2020-08-20 18:32:22+00:00): Naprawdę, miałem powód aby dodać do tego budynku noaddress=yes :)

Jest tak, albowiem adres Miłosławska 3 ma przypisany budynek mieszkalny [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61790382], a nie ów handlowo-usługowy (oba znajdują się na tej samej działce). Obecnie, ten adres został więc zdublowany :/

Wiem, że ten budynek ma tabliczkę z adresem, jednak jest to spowodowane tylko tym, że jest on najbliżej wjazdu na posesję.

Pozwoliłem sobie to poprawić i przy okazji dodałem szczegóły ze strony www zakładu.
szydzio (2020-08-20 21:07:44+00:00): Co do adresu cóż - taki jest "ground truth". Ten warsztat de facto również wykorzystuje w praktyce taki adres jak budynek mieszkalny obok. Skoro jednak tak bardzo chcesz trzymać się adresów jedynie urzędowych nie będę o to kruszył kopii. Mam tylko nadzieję że nie kasujesz z automatu adresów, których nie ma w GISie a które i tak funkcjonują w terenie ;-) ileż to razy słyszałem w urzędzie że właściciel zwyczajnie nie wystąpił o nadanie punktu adresowego ? Zaś co do opisu budynku to pozwolę sobie jednak na powrót do industial bo to na prawdę nie jest budynek komercyjny tylko produkcyjny (przemysłowy/warsztat), choćby nawet dla jakiegoś urzędu był on handlowo-usługowy...
pio2_122 (2020-08-20 22:52:42+00:00): No właśnie "ground truth" - trzeba brać to z dystansem. Jeśli ktoś będzie się tego kurczowo trzymał, to będziemy mieli adresy przypisane do ogrodzeń, czy furtek (bo i tam niekiedy są umieszczone tabliczki z numerem) :P

Nie chodzi mi o ścisłe trzymanie się danych urzędowych, a po prostu o unikanie dubli i logiczność przypisania adresu. Budynek handlowo-usługowy (czy warsztat, itp.) jest z założenia budynkiem niemieszkalnym, więc jeżeli na tej samej działce znajduje się budynek mieszkalny, gdzie są zameldowane jakieś osoby, to wydaje mi się, że to właśnie on powinien mieć przypisany adres.

Odnośnie kasowania nieistniejących w GIS'ie adresów: naprawdę, wielokrotnie zgłaszam właśnie takie brakujące adresy, a usuwam tylko adresy, które są od lat "w polu" i w końcu zniknęły z GIS'u lub nigdy ich tam nie było (sprawdzam to również z aktualnymi zdjęciami sat. sentinel'a, danymi urzędowymi odnośnie budynków, Mapillary, GSV, itd.) - dzięki temu mam dużą pewność, że dany adres rzeczywiście nie istnieje.
Nawet jeśli dostawałem informację, że dany budynek nie ma nadanego adresu, to to dodawałem taki adres do OSM (o ile takowy nie występował już gdzieś w okolicy).

Wybrałem building=commercial, ponieważ nie jest to duży zakład produkcyjny/przemysłowy, a praktycznie manufaktura. Moim zdaniem, do takich manufaktur/warsztatów pasuje on lepiej (zakład realizuje także produkcje jednostkowe i od klientów indywidualnych).
Jednak nie będę się przy tym upierał, ponieważ nawet sama nazwa zakładu ("Zakład Produkcyjno Usługowy...") wskazuje na pogranicze tych dwóch funkcji :)
Frans S (2020-08-22 11:37:54+00:00): Hello 
Thanks for mapping.
You have a sharp eye that you can identify a grass field. :-) 
Pleces focus on the  buildings which has to be mapped here.
Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Carnildo (2020-08-21 07:28:47+00:00): Where are you getting these names from?  As of this evening, there were no signs indicating that the street was named "Crescent Avenue", or that either of the footways had names.
Howpper (2020-08-21 11:15:41+00:00): As for the road names, I got them from the City of Spokane map (https://maps.spokanecity.org/#). As for the footpath, it runs along the right-of-way of North Center Street.
UW Maddie (2020-09-02 12:58:02+00:00): all objects based on bing bird's eye imagery have been deleted to align with osm rules