piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SK53 (2021-11-21 12:54:24+00:00): See https://e.n.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folly

There are various books on follies in Britain (this is a good overview http://follies.org.uk/index.php/books/), and it would be nice to be able to identify them. My favourite is the Pineapple at Dunmore https://www.nts.org.uk/visit/places/the-pineapple. Many follies are just landmarks like White Nancy, some are completely useless, but ornamental, others have some use, but are primarily there as "eyecatchers" (e.g., this was possibly a boathouse https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:False_Bridge,_Wollaton_Park_-_geograph.org.uk_-_874421.jpg). As they are so various they do not form any one building (or man_made) tag, but do recognisably belong to a particular tradition of creating artificial landscapes.
ottorol (2021-10-15 16:15:38+00:00): а вы уверены что там дорога? был в мае этого года и там максимум тропа.
eggie (2021-10-06 08:55:05+00:00): Shop is gone ?

Wat heb je nu aangepast? Alleen shop=bicycle verwijderd, maar de rest van de info staat er nog steeds. 
Moet dat niet ook verwijderd worden op de BAG-data na?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-06 08:58:53+00:00): Alle shopinfo heb ik verwijderd
MVG
eggie
Polleke2 (2021-10-06 09:28:57+00:00): Hallo Eggie, 
Sorry, ik heb het editen te snel gedaan ben ik bang.
Ik heb nog een andere wijziging die niet echt standaard is. Misschien kun je even helpen meedenken wat de beste oplossing is. 
De Adrianuskerk in Esbeek is verbouwd tot Basisschool Samenwijs Torenlei. Maar het is van buiten nog steeds een kerkgebouw. 
Is het mogelijk om beide feiten te behouden of moet het toch maar gewoon een school worden?

MvG, Paul
eggie (2021-10-06 09:41:15+00:00): De naam van het gebouw staat los van de naam van de schoolinstelling.
Dus de  'oude' naam van de kerk kan gewoon op de gebouwomtrek blijven en de naam van de school op de adresnode met amenity=school.
Zal straks wel even kijken hoe je het hebt gedaan.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-06 09:43:41+00:00): Over de kerk en het schoolterrein aansluitend aan de begraafplaats maak je een vlak met landuse=educatie en omdat dat nog steeds niet render voeg je ook amenity=school toe. Dat kan weg als de rendering van landuse=education is doorgevoerd (Kan wel even duren)
Succes
eggie (2021-10-06 09:44:27+00:00): typo landuse=education
met extra amenity=school
eggie (2021-10-06 09:46:11+00:00): .... en op de gebouwomtrek building=school ipv church
eggie (2021-10-06 11:04:24+00:00): landuse=education heb ik toegevoegd. Je kunt zelf de school toevoegen op de adresnode met amenity=school en name=.....
website phone=+31 enz. 
Doe je het zelf?

MVG
eggie
Polleke2 (2021-10-06 11:45:45+00:00): Dat zelf doen daar gaat het natuurlijk eigenlijk om. Maar dit was toch een beetje een speciaal gevalletje.
Ik ga het gewoon doen, dan kun jij het altijd nog controleren.

MvG, Paul
eggie (2021-10-06 12:42:13+00:00): Gelukt zie ik.
Was toch even bezig daar. Parkeermogelijkheid heb ik toegevoegd en het paadje verbeterd van Mr Lauwersstraat naar Dorpsstraat. Dat routeert nu voor fietsers.
De amenity= childcare kun je beter apart op een node zetten.. desnoods zonder adres. 
Dat heeft zo geen effect. 
one feature one element.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-06 12:46:16+00:00): .. en de brievenbus regenover de school. Mocht die zijn weggehaald dan kun je 'm gerust verwijderen.
Polleke2 (2021-10-06 13:41:48+00:00): De brievenbus is de enige in het dorp, die willen we blijven houden ;)
De childcare heb ik weggehaald. 
Een "zwevende" childcare lijkt me ook niet handig.

MvG, Paul
Sandal man (2021-10-09 20:42:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990289496
And a other one without tags.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-09 18:17:23+00:00): This area corresponds to its description as a sandy area and is locally different from desert and other non-vegetated places, and also the tag natural=desert is not rendered in OSM Carto
Petr Fukátko (2021-10-11 06:21:37+00:00): Hi. 
OK. It is locally used like this and that is big argument. 
But I still miss information about desert in tags. So I'm thinking about adding new tag desert=erg. It is ok for you?
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-11 08:27:03+00:00): Yes, I think this describes the place better, as long as the tag "natural=sand" is present, because not all deserts are sandy 
best regards
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-26 11:11:54+00:00): I am very sorry, after considering your change and inquiring from more than one person, I retract my words and I am very sorry, describing the place as natural=desert, and putting the tag surface=sand better describing the place as a sandy desert, and I did not notice that you put the tag surface=sand.
Kind regards, and I will make the same changes as you
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-26 17:10:21+00:00): I would probably reverse those changes I made in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112990098
  Since natural=desert is not currently displayed on openstreetmap-carto see:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4488
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/1200
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/773
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:natural%3Ddesert
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-26 17:15:13+00:00): Do you support keeping these spaces as natural=desert regardless of the style and the way they appear in it?
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-27 06:12:46+00:00): done:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113020196
Petr Fukátko (2021-10-27 08:31:26+00:00): Hi.
For me is more important to have good data then good looking openstreetmap-carto style. Mapping for rendering is in my opinion not right. 
On the other hand "natural=sand" is widledly used and lot of people is using this style. 
I'm thinking that way around could be polygon with tag natural=sand and relaiton with one member (this polygon) with tags natural=desert, surface=sand desert=erg, wikidata and wikipedia. Name of desert should be in this case also part of relation, but than it wouldn't be rendered.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-27 10:16:22+00:00): That's right, it's not correct to edit based on rendering style, also the solution you mentioned is very cool, it solves the problem completely except for the name issue (because one of the fonts will be a member of two relationships and we won't be able to put the name tag on it)
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-27 10:33:51+00:00): because one of the ways*
Sorry the translator changed ways to fonts
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-27 11:58:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113034853
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-27 11:59:53+00:00): Another problem I had during the implementation is that relations with inner members cannot be tagged with natural=sand
Petr Fukátko (2021-10-27 12:28:05+00:00): I didn't know that relations with natural=sand cannot have inner members. It does not make sense for me. But current state is better for me then previous one. Thanks a lot.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-27 12:58:35+00:00): if there relation with natural=desert and have inner way members and we but natural=sand on outer way members the rendering style will fill all area (including inner members) and that is a problem, what if we have more then relation with same members and one of them is with natural=desert tag and the other natural=sand?
map per (2021-11-15 10:27:44+00:00): I don't think that using natural=desert is a good idea as this tag is not well defined. One can't exacly tell where a desert start an where ist ends. Thats why I would use natural=sand.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-15 13:34:50+00:00): yes natural=desert is poorly defined and not consistently used but the wiki recommends that
map per (2021-11-15 14:31:44+00:00): Anyone can write in the wiki and finding consens on what tags to use is a gradual process. The page for natural=desert includs a warning because of poor verifyability and was only edited by eight people so far (ten people on the proposed page). So I wouldn't rely to much on this wiki entry
map per (2021-11-15 14:33:17+00:00): Moreover desert proposual has the status abandoned
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-15 16:56:48+00:00): Thank you for the clarification, I will change the tags to natural=sand
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-15 17:12:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113814683
map per (2021-11-15 20:22:59+00:00): Thank you, have a nice day
ovruni (2021-10-06 21:03:49+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios indica que tienen diferentes nombre, pero actualmente las vías no tienen un nombre. ¿En que se basa para indicar que son de diferente nombre?
Saludos
gabro00 (2021-10-06 12:23:30+00:00): A szombati nyitvatartás úgy látom változatlan, ilyenkor nem szükséges ismételni a szabályt. Itt tudod ellenőrizni (ezt használom én is) https://openingh.ypid.de/evaluation_tool/
Valkai_S (2021-10-06 14:57:12+00:00): Igazad van, ezt észre se vettem, hogy a szombati nem változik, köszi :)
Tegnap 5 után, de még 6 előtt próbáltam bejutni, akkor derült ki, hogy  megváltozott a nyitvatartás
.
wolfgang8 (2021-11-30 14:00:12+00:00): Hallo Harry,

du hast auf diesen Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9151037080 "give_way" gesetzt. Das wird normalerweise nur bei Kreuzungen verwendet - siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dgive_way

Ich nehme an, du wolltest "Vorrang des Gegenverkehrs" taggen. Dafür gibt es den priority-Key, der am betreffenden highway eingetragen wird - siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:priority

Und bist du sicher, dass "Vorrang des Gegenverkehrs" noch aktuell ist? Ich denke das war bei der alten Brücke so, die relativ schmal war. Die neue Brücke ist ca. 8 m breit und sollte für zwei Fahrspuren genügend Platz bieten.

Grüße
Wolfgang
wolfgang8 (2021-12-10 15:49:13+00:00): Nachdem Harry_S_17 sich bisher nicht gemeldet hat, hab ich das "give_way" bei der Brücke entfernt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114789857
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Szymson (2021-10-10 12:57:23+00:00): Dobrze, że powoli pojawiają się konkrety odnośnie tego przystanku. Dzięki za dodanie szczegółów :)
Frans S (2021-10-06 09:27:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Do you standard ask for a review? I've checked several changeset and for me your mapping quality is fine. You can switch it off. ( you can always ask for it when you think it is needed)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112159119
eggie (2021-10-06 09:33:07+00:00): Dag matrover. In OSM proberen we zoveel mogelijk op de juiste adresnode bij te taggen. Ik heb de info overgezet.

MVG
eggie
matrover (2021-10-06 11:36:23+00:00): oke, kun je me laten zien hoe ik dat doe? dan neem ik dat mee in het vervolg
eggie (2021-10-06 12:37:31+00:00): Wat ik gedaan heb is gewoon de adres- en bedrijfsinfo  verwijderd van het grote gebouw. Adresnode 2 p[gezocht. Geselecteerd en daar de naam, phone en website aan toegevoegd.
Paar keer ctrl-f5 (cache leegmaken) en dan zie je het wel staan.
Met adresnode 2 kun je evt. nog slepen naar de gewenste plek.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-06 12:50:08+00:00): Mapper Commodootje heeft allerlei fimpjes gemaakt hoe je zoiets doet

Hier kun  je zien hoe je de POI kunt samenvoegen met JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/SwNPndGRUZA
eggie (2021-10-06 12:53:50+00:00): Voor de betere editor JOSM zie
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
VIPINDAS K (2021-10-11 17:18:18+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q),  Building 2 or more will not overlap...
Please check it...
Happy mapping...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112159698
tttnnn24 (2024-02-15 10:24:34+00:00): Hoi Gapscene. Ik heb gekeken bij de Wildwissel Woeste Hoeve. Daarna het stukje Turnhoutsebaan en zijn cycleway voorzien van covered=yes zodat die twee onder de wissel renderen. Okay of kan het nog beter?
Gapscene (2024-02-16 10:52:57+00:00): Hoi tttnnn24. Bedankt voor correctie en de uitleg ervan. Het ziet er prima uit zo.
alester (2021-10-06 19:01:53+00:00): I noticed in this changeset (as well as 112163892), you changed a Thrifty Foods location to Sobeys. While Sobeys bought the chain in 2007, the stores have remained branded as Thrifty Foods. It's a very longstanding local brand, so I'm pretty sure there would be quite a bit of media coverage if the stores were being rebranded, but I can't find anything. Are you sure these are now Sobeys? I can swing by one of these when I'm out tomorrow, but I'm almost certain these are still Thrifty Foods.
Rps333 (2021-10-06 20:22:37+00:00): Thanks. I was fixing notes in the area and ID suggested the name change. Feel free to correct if it was mistake.

Cheers

John
highflyer74 (2021-10-07 15:49:42+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! I am not sure, as you use English on your operating system, if this is your primary language or is German fine as well?

Anyway, I came across this outer line, which is part of a multipolygon relation, just carrying name=Kreisel. This is not doing any good to be honest, as no data consumer will understand what is meant by it. The road already carries all needed data to make it a road which is part of a "Kreisel".

One very important thing is: only use name=* for objects that actually have a name and not to describe objects.

I can send you some of my collected "guidance" material via PM if you are interested. Just let me know!
SebastianHelm (2021-10-07 16:46:36+00:00): Thanks for your comment. I wasn't aware that there was a feature named “Kreisel” already, so per what you wrote and per the principle “don't tag for the renderer” I'll remove it. (I'll reply to the rest by PM.)
Filip009 (2022-05-18 08:22:27+00:00): Dobrý deň, prečo ste sa rozhodol použiť na časti hradu tag place=locality?
Peter Vojtek (2022-05-18 12:54:03+00:00): tento postup som videl na niektorom inom hrade, a tak ho pouzivam uz dlhsie.
neviem ci mate lepsi sposob ako pomenovat casti hradu, ktore ale nie su zakreslene ako budovy.
Filip009 (2022-05-18 13:23:19+00:00): Ťažko povedať možno building:part. Lenže ako píšete "ktore ale nie su zakreslene ako budovy" tak tam sa to asi nehodí. A kde ste to videl? Že sa spýtam ďalej, lebo takto sa mi to nepáči. A na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality sa píše "which there is no extant feature to which the tag could be associated" čo mi príde, že tu by sa to dalo asociovať s hradom. A ešte by ma zaujímalo, že kde to bolo napísané na tom hrade, či na jednej tabuli, alebo v každej časti bola tabuľa? :)
Peter Vojtek (2022-05-20 14:40:09+00:00): > A ešte by ma zaujímalo, že kde to bolo napísané na tom hrade, či na jednej tabuli, alebo v každej časti bola tabuľa?

na vacsine hradov je mapa s nazvami casti hradu, ale niektore maju tabulku s nazvom priamo pri danej vezi/stene/... uz si nepamatam ako to bolo na tomto hrade
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-02 16:45:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9151210414/history has se = 4 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
HJS_Holten (2024-05-03 08:25:41+00:00): Se should Seats. I solved the problem.
puma515 (2021-10-06 17:12:19+00:00): habe in der bearbeitung auch noch die firmen die es vor ort nicht mehr gibt gelöscht.
eggie (2021-10-06 10:51:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
MarcoR (2022-01-08 17:04:35+00:00): Ho controllato questo gruppo di modifiche e non ho trovato errori (stando alle foto aeree).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112163640
BCNorwich (2021-10-06 12:41:11+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Is the Pumpkin House really now a cafe? Or is it still a seasonal stall to sell pumpkins? I can find no reference on the internet to suggest there is a permanent cafe here. If there is no permanent feature here then the cafe POI should be removed.

Regards Bernard.
ChehrehBargi (2022-12-26 19:44:07+00:00): باسلام
انتهای نیلوفر ۳ که بیش از یک سال قبل آن را تصحیح کرده بودم درست بود. این کوچه بن‌بست با دیوار نیست بلکه قبلا متصل بود و الان بلوک سیمانی در انتهای کوچه قرار دارد.
Frans S (2021-10-06 13:03:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
You map on the Bing imagery, this is only for reference when Mapbox imgaery is bad to map from
Mapbox is prescribed.
At the left building, you drew the notch correctly.
You only partially drew the middle building. It continues to the shadow edge and has an L shape.
For all buildings, square them with the Q key
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112164754
4004 (2021-10-10 23:21:01+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
если там не крупное здание, то можно и точкой обойтись.
ну и металлолом добавил в теги recycling:scrap_metal=yes, а то иначе не отличить от других пунктов вторсырья
Frans S (2021-10-06 12:50:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested.
Sorry to say, but your mappings are subject to improvement.

Please pay attention on these points. 
Buildings are in general rectangular and square.
This should be reflected in your mapping. 
So map more accurate and square each building.
You included in some cases the yard belonging to a building. Only the building needs to be mapped.
I had to revert the bad mappings. It cost more time to correct them rather than map them again.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112165189
Frans S (2021-10-06 12:42:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
a: square the buildings you map.
You overlooked 2 buildings . 1 dark brown next to the middle building,
1 gray building left of the lower building
when you open this changeset in iDeditor you can see what I mean.
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112165214
marczoutendijk (2023-02-11 16:18:31+00:00): On this way: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990400022
you have surface=maxar
What does that mean?
Frans S (2021-10-06 12:52:51+00:00): Hello. See my comments on the other changeset.
Best regards
Frans S (2021-10-06 12:58:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square each building and do not connect buildings together with their nodes.
Do not include the shadow in your mapping.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112165494
neuhausr (2021-10-12 15:16:13+00:00): Hi, I noticed you retagged the playground to be leisure=fitness_center, which isn't a valid tag. leisure=fitness_centre is used for places like health clubs/gyms, but that doesn't seem to fit this place. leisure=fitness_station is used for outdoor fitness equipment--is that what you're thinking of? Happy mapping!
topolusitania (2021-10-13 19:48:30+00:00): corrected. Tks
eggie (2021-10-06 18:58:01+00:00): Dag CDE,
Je vraagt feedback.
Lijkt me oke zo..
MVG
eggie
aixbrick (2021-10-07 16:11:26+00:00): Hello,
"Monschauer Strasse" is not an alternative name, it is a wrong spelling. Moreover you added/changed doubtful tags/data. Reverted with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112224029.
Regards
Nakaner (2021-10-07 16:22:18+00:00): Hi Julien,

if a geocoding engine is not able to translate ß to ss or vice versa, it needs to be improved. "ss" is the official replacement of "ß" in German for typewriters/software which do not support umlauts/are ASCII only.

Nominatim supports ss←→ß.

Best regards

Michale
skfd (2021-11-08 23:39:20+00:00): Привет!
По-идее адрес надо вешать на домик. И все участки закрашивать как landuse=allotments
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dallotments)
как отдельный участок обозначить не нашел (
farmland ето большие поля, а тут как раз огороды так что allotments.
 
Александр ето ты?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112166222
Rodrigo_Freire (2021-10-06 21:36:45+00:00): Considerar as edificações pela perimetro delas no lugar do lote inteiro. Deixa a informação mais correta.
RicoElectrico (2021-10-06 12:15:57+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za poprawę mapy. Ta uwaga pewnie jest Twoja? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2883321

Nie odbiorę Ci przyjemności jej zamknięcia :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-06 14:43:15+00:00): re https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2883089

oh, subject: prefix is not a big problem - fixing 100 (with proper review) takes less time than mapping one plaque
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-10-08 12:30:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 112262975 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some spam.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5363 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5364 .