piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
glibbertorsten (2018-07-31 10:35:57+00:00): Okay, mit dem Nikolaisaal streite ich nicht, wer zuletzt gemappt hat, hat Recht. Aber wenn du vor Ort nicht geprüft hast, kannst du doch nicht einfach Sachen ändern? Warum soll eine Hofdurchfahrt ein Gebäude trennen? Sei dir versichert, es ist ein Gebäude mit zwei Hausnummern...
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-30 19:29:45+00:00): #vandalism ?

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61205425
Dinamik (2018-07-30 23:14:51+00:00): Здравствуйте! Статусные части у озёр указываются явно независимо ни от чего: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C#.D0.9E
VlIvYur (2018-08-08 08:11:27+00:00): Dinamik, не надо давать ссылку на левую страницу. Есть нормальная https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE где русским по белому написано:
Названия должны ограничиваться только именем предмета и не должны включать слова-категории которые мы обозначаем тегами, описания, адрес и почтовый индекс либо замечание
Никто не договаривался у озёр писать статусную часть

Верни обратно как было
Dinamik (2018-08-08 14:34:08+00:00): Здравствуйте! Скажите, пожалуйста, как Вы отличаете левые страницы от нормальных, если и те, и те редактируются и используются разными редакторами? Водоём может называться водохранилищем, прудом, озером, ериком, лиманом, морем, разливом и т. д. То, что является озером с точки зрения физической географии, не обязательно называется озером - соответственно, даже при указании тегов, характеризующих водоём как естественный закрытый определить "статусную" часть названия нельзя. Поэтому данные о том, как же конкретно объект именуется, являются вполне полезной информацией о названии (даже Вашей ссылке не больно-то и противоречащей). Примечание про озера появилось в документации много лет назад после обсуждения на форуме.
VlIvYur (2018-08-20 21:56:03+00:00): Как обозначить-производная от других страница.Информация на ней может запаздывать от других страниц.Но некоторые пользователи что-то пишут туда,не утруждая себя писать в вики оригинальных тегов.Из-за чего и получается что "озеро" в name есть только на этой странице,но нет ни на странице name,ни на странице water.
Водохранилище вообще обозначается по-другому,для остальных есть (или должны быть) соответствующие теги в water

Голосования про озёра не было,каких-либо договорённостей,кроме пары фраз на форуме,тоже не было
Dinamik (2018-08-21 14:46:20+00:00): В описании оригинального тега https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dwater про тегирование озёр тоже написано. Речь не о том, как обозначаются объекты, являющиеся с точки зрения физической географии водохранилищами, а о том, что озеро может называться прудом, озером, водохранилищем, морем и т. д., пруды и водохранилища тоже могут абы как называться и т. д. Тип объекта не связан напрямую с тем, как его называют. Если не было голосования, по крайней мере,не следует говорить, что "обрезание" названий является единственно возможным вариантом, нужно допускать наличие иных точек зрения.
VlIvYur (2018-08-24 20:21:09+00:00): Вот-вот,прислушайтесь к своему совету и держите иную точку зрения при себе до голосования.И не надо в wiki с таким упорством восстанавливать категоричное утверждение canabis,коль это лишь его да ваши желания
А до того действует общий принцип именования об'ектов,в котором нет места статусу
Если озеро называется "...пруд",то оно либо так и называется "...пруд" и статус water=lake,либо "пруд" является статусной частью и оно совсем не озеро,а water=pond
Dinamik (2018-08-27 05:14:53+00:00): Наверное, было бы лучше позволять редакторам высказываться, чем молчать: проект же совместный. Необходимости восстанавливать нет, если существующее много лет не удаляется при наличии возражений на такое удаление (кстати, если Ваш коллега считает отвечать на своей странице обсуждения ниже своего достоинства, можно Вас попросить сделать это). У Вас, получается, озеро прудом называться может, а пруд прудом - нет. Не нонсенс ли?
mariotomo (2020-02-19 02:44:16+00:00): hola.  si quisieras revisar esta edición tuya … aquí no veo nada en la foto aérea, y pasaste este nombre de village a town, se trata de una cabecera de corregimiento.
Alvarado2510 (2020-02-19 11:16:40+00:00): Saludos, si vez la fecha, de la edición, te percatar as que fue editado mucho antes, de que me invitarán a telegram y acordarnos el uso de la categoría según su población.
Así que tengo varios distritos por corregir, si me ayudan lo podemos corregir, mas rápido. 
Gracias por tu comentario.
acsd (2018-07-31 16:57:55+00:00): Если это обычные баки для бытового отхода, то следует обозначать тегом "amenity=waste_disposal", в редакторе ищутся по запросу "мусорный бак"
user_5359 (2018-07-31 04:10:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A parking slot have ways with highway=service, service=parking_aisle. This ways are not the boundary of the parking slot.
JMcCorison (2018-07-31 19:43:21+00:00): The lines I drew were the approximate main isles in the parking area, not the outer boundaries of the lot. I changed the two loops as you suggested. Thanks for the help.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-30 19:29:36+00:00): #vandalism ?

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61205640
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-31 15:57:35+00:00): Hello! I know that it is an ancient edit but maybe you can take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4094700 ?
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-30 19:29:26+00:00): #vandalism ?

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61205757
Commodoortje (2018-07-30 20:25:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2018-08-01 17:40:54+00:00): Is dat een fout in OSM of is dat een fout in SKP ? Je haalt de informatie building=commercial wel weg uit OSM.
Dat lijkt mij geen juiste reactie voor dit probleem.
Graag een reactie.
Tobsme (2018-08-01 18:33:24+00:00): I have added an extra field for the building. Adding the field building1=yes solved the issue of not seeing the osm building polygons when imported in skp, acad and blender.
Leo Slager (2018-08-01 19:09:00+00:00): Worden dan alle gebouwen met building=* niet geïmporteerd.?
Dan ligt de fout dus in de andere software !
Tobsme (2018-08-01 20:31:21+00:00): All buildings with the tag building=yes are visible in the osm when imported to cad software.
1) When a building contains tags:
Building=commercial and
Building1=yes 
Then a polygon is exported in the osm and can be seen in acad, blender, and SketchUp from what I have tested.

2)when building contains tag:
 Building=commercial
But does NOT include tag:
 Building1=yes
Then no polygon is created and an empty space is shown in the cad softwares.

I might be wrong but it seemed to workaround the issue.
Leo Slager (2018-08-02 00:02:43+00:00): Well, I hate workarounds.
Other software should import teh buildings if in OSM the building have a tag "building= *.
It should not be that in OSM every building has the tag building=yes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
Rich1234 (2018-07-31 01:39:05+00:00): FYI, parking area ways, being non-navigable, really should not interconnect with the navigable road ways.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways in the section "Crossing ways": "Note that navigable ways should not be connected with other ways like landuse etc."
speaketh (2018-07-31 14:40:43+00:00): Ok, thanks for the info. I think I'm doing it correctly in changeset 61229859, please let me know if there's still something wrong.
viloan (2018-07-30 19:49:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-07-31 15:28:46+00:00): waste_basket with access=public (this is the standard value) okay, but what means access1=public?
binfalse (2018-07-31 21:55:24+00:00): ah, that was just a typo with my fat fingers in osmand ;-)
fixed it. thanks for checking
G_P_J (2021-03-16 16:40:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245241767/history Pamiętasz może o co chodziło z tym adresem? Czyszczę fixme i nie wiem, czy coś tutaj trzeba jeszcze poprawić. Adres zgodny z PRG.
maraf24 (2021-03-16 20:38:26+00:00): Tak, fixme już zbędne.
Dałem je chyba dlatego, że nie widziałem poprawionego adresu po stronie urzędu.
user_5359 (2018-07-31 15:44:42+00:00): Hello, Did you mean note=В помещении магазина продуктов instead of npte=В помещении магазина продуктов?
literan (2018-08-06 10:20:29+00:00): already fixed by mueschel
user_3961358 (2020-09-20 15:19:45+00:00): Where did you find the water tap in Eppeldorf?
maraf24 (2018-07-31 08:53:48+00:00): Naprawiłem adres.
kasmar00 (2018-08-04 13:56:58+00:00): Hej, highway=platform określa peron przystanku (jego krawędź albo jego powierzchnie) a nie drogę po jakiej autobus wjeżdża na przystanek (do zatoki). Na przyszłość nie przerysowuj ich w ten sposób.
chaotyczny (2018-08-05 16:19:11+00:00): Ok, dzięki za info, na przyszłość będę pamiętał :)
user_5359 (2018-07-31 16:13:34+00:00): Hello Nick! You add a new key "type_of_post_box". Please have a look o the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:post_box:type. Can this be a typo?
Tallguy (2018-07-31 16:41:00+00:00): Hi @user_5359 - thanks for that, you're right - I'll sort them out later today!  Regards
Nick
Tallguy (2018-07-31 16:55:29+00:00): should all be fixed now in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61235745
user_5359 (2018-07-31 04:02:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
glglgl (2018-07-31 09:57:12+00:00): An admin_centre must be a node, not a way. I hope you don't mind that I will revert this changeset in order to correct the issue.
highflyer74 (2018-07-31 13:12:42+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!

Du hast um einen "Review" gebeten: sieht gut aus!

Gruss aus HB!
highflyer74 (2018-07-31 13:08:04+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Danke für Deinen Beitrag. Kleiner Tipp: sei so nett, Flächen nicht mit Wegen zu verbinden. Das ist zwar nicht verboten (und in manchen Gegenden sogar verbreitet), viele Mapper sind aber der Ansicht, dass die Wartung der Daten durch viele übereinander liegenden Linien sehr erschwert wird. Insofern hilfst Du Deinen Mit-Mappern, wenn Du Flächen wie diese Wiese auf die wirkliche Größe beschränkst und nicht mit der Straße verbindest. Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!
Dinamik (2018-07-31 05:20:28+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вновь обращаю Ваше внимание, что озёра в базе данных подписываются явно: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C#.D0.9E , https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dwater . До изменения рекомендаций удаление части названий является некорректным (теряются данные).
maraf24 (2018-08-03 11:59:31+00:00): Proszę nie wykonywać testów na danych produkcyjnych!
Testować można sobie w samouczku w edytorze, jest tam całe miasto dostępne do testowania.
GerdP (2023-09-22 08:24:23+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Bist Du sicher, dass (nur) die  beiden Waldgebiete "Dammer Berge" heißen? Ich hätte eher erwartet, dass es eine boundary mit dem Namen gibt, die die beiden Wälder und weitere Gebiete einschließen.
Galbinus (2023-09-22 22:15:31+00:00): Da hast Du sicherlich Recht. Es wäre sicherlich besser, eine boundary anzulegen. Doch wo die entlangläuft, dazu fehlt mir die Ortskenntnis. Ich war vor ein paar Jahren dort im Urlaub und habe während des Urlaubs nach den mir damals zur Verfügung stehenden Informationen das westliche Waldstück auch mit dem Namen "Dammer Berge" versehen, da ich wohl die Information vorliegen hatte, das dieses auch zu den Dammer Bergen gehört und nicht nur das östliche Waldgebiet, das bereits damals mit diesem Namen versehen war.
Galbinus (2023-09-22 22:16:27+00:00): Wenn Du also irgendwelche Informationen findest oder hast, was zu den Dammer Bergen gehört, dann wäre es gut, eine Boundary anzulegen und diese statt der Waldgebiete mit dem Namen zu versehen.
GerdP (2023-09-23 04:10:15+00:00): 
Ich bin da auch nur als Touri unterwegs. In OSM gibt es tatsächlich vier Waldgebiete mit dem Namen. Im Internet finde ich ein Landschaftsschutzgebiet "Dammer Berge" und ein "FFH-Gebiet 317 Dammer Berge", siehe https://www.nlwkn.niedersachsen.de/natura2000/schutzgebiete_zur_umsetzung_von_natura_2000/landschaftsschutzgebiet-dammer-berge-172305.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-30 22:09:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 61157677, 61158217, 61198728.
JJIglesias (2018-07-31 00:22:08+00:00): Saludos. En bolivia no existe name:es, pues por defecto todo nuestra data es en Espaniol; la name=Avenida Guapay tiene como alt_name=Avenida Canal Cotoca; si es posible tener name en Quechua, Aymara o Guarani, si tales denominaciones existieran...
Gracias
JJ
Hjart (2018-08-01 05:48:54+00:00): Please be careful when editing roads: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61210329 (note around the end of Skrænten in eastern part of Varde)
YraFyra (2018-08-01 05:56:19+00:00): I'm sorry!!!!
Thanks for finding and fixing it!!!!!!!!
Hjart (2018-08-01 06:10:17+00:00): I'm happy to see other Vespucci users, allthough I know how tricky it can be ;-)
Hjart (2018-08-01 06:15:36+00:00): OSMI flagged this one this morning btw
dikkeknodel (2018-07-31 10:06:19+00:00): Hi danzhch,
This zigzag of the elevation profile is caused because the segments of the relation are not ordered correctly. Waymarkedtrails also shows this message "Route is potentially unordered or incomplete. Elevation information might be inaccurate." to give you this hint :-).
The route should be in the exact order as you would walk it. You also see this if you move over the elevation profile with your mouse. The respective location is also shown on the map, but suddenly it jumps to a completely different position. This is because the next segment in the list is not geographically connected to the previous.
Does this help you understand what is going on?
I'm not familiar with ordering segments in iD editor, as I always use JOSM editor (where it is pretty easy), so I cannot help you with the exact approach there.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
danzhch (2018-07-31 20:11:41+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel,
Thanks a lot for the thorough explanation, it makes a lot of sense.
Fixing with JOSM was easy as well.
I might continue adding hiking routes throughout Switzerland... :)
Thanks again
dan
dikkeknodel (2018-08-01 11:33:27+00:00): Your welcome! Always happy to help out and share the knowledge that I gained, since it may be a steep learning curve for new contributors. At least that's how I experienced my own start with OSM, and I still learn new stuff regularly by viewing how others approach challenges and by asking questions, and reading the wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-08-01 11:37:57+00:00): One other hint I just though of. It seems like this route is a round-trip, starting and finishing at the aerialway station. I would suggest to add the starting leg also to the end, because that part would also need to be walked. In that way also the statistics on distances and elevation match better to the actual situation.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
Tom Layo (2018-10-19 03:42:56+00:00): Way 606605018 is not a track. It is 9 meters wide, does not connect farms to fields, connects two villages.
mbethke (2018-07-31 08:22:01+00:00): Hi,
thanks for your addition! Could you try though to separate the names in different languages? I'm not sure how that works with Maps.ME but usually the Lao name should be in name:lo and the English one in name:en, with Lao also in "name" without a language tag.

cheers,
Matthias
is-zUser (2018-09-28 13:24:18+00:00): Danke fürs Einzeichnen der Hausnummern. Bitte beachten: Hausnummern müssen immer in Verbindung zur zugehörigen Straße eingetragen werden (addr:street). Am besten immer gleich vollständig eintragen (Nr., Str., PLZ, Ort, event. Ortsteil mit addr:suburb).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-30 23:58:16+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 61199552, 61199588, 61199913, 61199961, 61200050, 61200132, 61200194, 61200233, 61200269, 61200295.
Stalker61 (2018-07-31 04:14:46+00:00): Не трогай то чего никогда в глаза не видел
phidauex (2018-07-31 00:56:41+00:00): Hi, saw you requested a review of your edit! You made the right changes, but to go further, you can tag a driveway as "highway=service" and "service=driveway" which tells routers and renderers that it is an individual driveway. Also, in OSM we don't abbreviate road types - so Stoneridge Cir becomes Stoneridge Circle (we let the map rendering softwares abbreviate if they want to). I changed your driveway and a few neighboring driveways, and changed the name of Stoneridge Circle as examples for you, but looking around the neighborhood there are a lot that can be fixed now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61211159
itsjustmatt (2018-07-31 01:52:45+00:00): Awesome! Thanks! I've never used the edit feature on the OSM.org website. I will update my driveway and the others around my neighborhood as "highway=service" and "service=driveway". Thanks for that info.
itsjustmatt (2018-07-31 02:58:21+00:00): Would it be proper for me to label all my neighbors' driveways as "access=private"? It seems some are and some aren't.
phidauex (2018-07-31 04:09:31+00:00): In most cases, private access would be implied by the tag "service=driveway", so it isn't strictly necessary. However, if you are using the iD editor in browser, and select the preset "Driveway" from the feature panel on the left side, it will automatically add "access=private". I wouldn't worry about it too much, but go ahead and use the "Driveway" preset to save time when editing new ones.
Papper2k (2018-07-31 02:13:33+00:00): While using GPS, the roundabout and some of the roads were way offset from their position, but after the changes I've done the standard map layer without satellite is much worse, still learning and would love to help make roads/pathways more accurate!
ndm (2018-07-31 20:10:01+00:00): So this was mapped really carefully previously -- did you survey this on foot? There are no-entry signs at either end -- there is no other signage. So, that doesn't stop cyclists entering in the middle of the road from the footpath and exiting (potentially from either end) -- many regularly exit onto the A38. To a certain extent "access=no" also messes up the routing for pedestrians too. Maybe you could reconsider your changes.
markzawi (2018-07-31 20:40:25+00:00): Sorry, my mistake.  I went back and changed the access to allow bikes and foot traffic.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61241530

Thank you,
Mark
Ewen Hill (2018-07-31 11:07:10+00:00): Thanks for the really detailed edits around upper gully.  If you are doing more around the  national park or main roads, you may find the Mapillary images helpful. These are available via the map data icon on the right hand side when you are editing. All the best
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-31 21:28:12+00:00): Hi arawashi, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped buildings? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61212439
5m4u9 (2018-07-31 21:32:17+00:00): hola, evitar añadir información privada personal, en mapsme puedes poner lugares favoritos como marcadores o favoritos...
user_5359 (2018-08-02 16:32:04+00:00): Hello! Short comment to the introducing of important_note. Please read the definition of note. Your tag "note" = "updated 2018/07/30 by Your Village Maps" doesn't match this definition (and can be found also in the history of the objects). Please use note instead the new key important_note.
Your Village Maps (2018-08-03 22:17:02+00:00): I have taken care of it.
ardhavara (2018-07-31 05:45:40+00:00): test
Athalis (2018-08-02 05:18:00+00:00): Hi, it looks like you accidentally shifted the complete river by 20m. For example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5797574057 it now intersects quite often with the primary road
Kathyaus (2018-08-02 06:23:14+00:00): That was a bad error on my part :-(
Kathyaus (2018-08-02 06:54:55+00:00): How do I reinstate the previous version?
Athalis (2018-08-02 08:26:56+00:00): I see you are using JOSM. One way would be with the Reverter plugin: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

That plugin allows you to either revert a complete changeset or to revert only the selected nodes & ways. When reverting a moved way it's nodes have to be selected too.

In this particular case I don't think a complete revert of that river would be the best case, as some sections of it are now better aligned to Bing & the roads.

For example at node 3033919389 and downstream the positions are now off due to the move, but from node 3033919502 upstream until node 3033685234 they look better now than before. I think that was the region you were working on with the roads as well.

I think the best solution would be to split the river near those points to keep the good part in the middle. Then either move the two unaligned ways manually, or select all nodes of them and use the reverter plugin only for that selection. After that combine the three ways back to one and review the complete way.

I hope you can follow my suggested approach? Do you want to perform those steps or should I do it?
Kathyaus (2018-08-02 10:33:45+00:00): I'm happy to give it a go. I also see the main roads as not aligned to Bing imagery Is that what you also see?
Athalis (2018-08-02 13:31:18+00:00): I think roads were mostly fine, I only have the area around node 2032609731 in memory but it looks like you've taken care of it. Thanks!
Warin61 (2019-03-25 08:26:52+00:00): You now have a shelter and foot path in the middle of a group tennis courts 

Deleted! Bing does not show these .. they appear to be fictional.
Warin61 (2019-03-25 08:36:41+00:00): I would suggest that a foot way Way: 612473561 does not go through a pavilion.. needs fixing!
AndjelaS (2019-11-01 10:51:32+00:00): Can you just confirm if there is a railway here because I can't see it?
Glenhope1 (2019-11-01 11:12:41+00:00): The cane railways? There's a lot of them.
AndjelaS (2019-11-01 12:00:53+00:00): After carefully rechecking imageries I agree with you. Sorry for the inconvenience.
user_5359 (2018-08-01 04:05:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic key payment:credit_cards / payment:debit_cards . This key should normaly only be used for negative value.
mstriewe (2018-08-01 19:14:45+00:00): Hallo, ich habe gerade den Review-Request an diesem Changeset gefunden. Wenn das Gebäude abgerissen wurde, kann es einfach gelöscht werden. Dieses Changeset fügt stattdessen dem Gebäudeumriss einen weiteren Punkt hinzu.
Rich1234 (2018-07-31 10:40:39+00:00): FYI, sidewalk ways, being navigable ways, should be connected by a node to other navigable ways that they cross.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways, specifically the section on "Crossing ways".

This new way crossed both a service road and N Pershing Dr and did not connect to either.  I've fixed both missed connections.