piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
poornibadrinath (2016-12-02 07:16:52+00:00): Wrong Changeset Comment. Sorry.
 The actual changeset comment is updating turn restrictions in LA using Mapillary.
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:12:39+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-12-02 16:53:40+00:00): 請不要在海上塗鴨，OpenStreetMap上的物件必須現實生活中存在
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mueschel (2016-12-04 12:26:46+00:00): Hi,
you used the key "atl_name" on 40 nodes - this should be "alt_name". Would you mind correcting these?
Jan
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ksp
mueschel (2017-04-02 15:23:52+00:00): Hi (again),
this upload also contains several hundred nodes without any tags. Can these be deleted?
Jan
rashaurl (2017-04-02 16:44:56+00:00): Hello,
You do not need to delete them, these are blanks. Thank you
mueschel (2017-04-08 14:44:38+00:00): What do you mean by 'blanks'? Single nodes without tags are just useless.
rashaurl (2017-04-10 12:18:17+00:00): Billet, in order to then add tags.
I understandably wrote?
rashaurl (2017-04-10 12:18:51+00:00): i use gogle translate))
TheSwavu (2016-12-02 10:52:58+00:00): Err, I think you'll find that the correct capitalisation is "Westlink" not "WestLink".

See:
https://www.roam.com.au/using-westlink-m7
acsd (2016-12-02 15:00:46+00:00): Там реальный бетонный блок? Или выдуманный для правильной маршрутизации?
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
alexejhorak (2016-12-02 08:54:47+00:00): it is not completed
mavl (2019-01-02 16:17:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-02 16:17:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-02 16:17:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-02 16:17:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-02 16:17:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
EneaSuper (2016-12-02 18:44:38+00:00): Mmmhhh Ale, vedo che ci sono un sacco di errori di sintassi :/
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
Taya_S (2024-05-23 16:27:03+00:00): Hi, I deleted all your contributions. Please don't upload bogus data
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2019-01-02 16:16:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-12-02 19:24:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station, too.
mavl (2019-01-02 16:16:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
freebeer (2018-12-01 18:07:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65078827 where the changeset comment is: At under 100 metres and 14 degrees north, this is no alpine hut.  #maps.me #randomtags
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
nevw (2016-12-02 11:23:04+00:00): Hi Batareikin
did you misspell this edit or should it be in Russian script....
name 	Tarago
name:ru 	Тараго
Batareikin (2016-12-02 13:46:56+00:00): It is all correct
It is Russian so it should be in Cyrillic script
user_5359 (2016-12-02 19:21:41+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
ivanbranco (2021-12-29 14:43:06+00:00): Ola Cladimir,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457187595/history

is this a village or a hamlet?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-21 10:25:47+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3043154 ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
Supaplex (2016-12-02 16:47:33+00:00): 還有用分號隔開G3, G70共線段編號
user_5359 (2016-12-02 17:10:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:17:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
Robert Whittaker (2017-04-27 09:04:14+00:00): Are you sure the postcode of "B92 7AW" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4533741026 is correct? According to Code-Point Open, that postcode is located over 3km away from this node.
brianboru (2017-04-27 12:25:41+00:00): Thanks Robert - probably caused by cut n paste.Now corrected
user_5359 (2016-12-02 17:03:01+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:35:59+00:00): [San Pedro, Laguna+Muntinlupa+Bulacan+Gapan, Nueva Ecija] add/modify various POIs
Upendrakarukonda (2017-02-01 06:00:42+00:00): Hello sirphilliptubell,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added the numbers in the `name;en` tag. If the numbers in the tag indicate the platform, you should used different tag. For better tagging follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Regards,

Upendra
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:27:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435354 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44111434 because there was a problem with licence of data use
richardbrinkman (2017-11-19 08:43:13+00:00): Ik zie dat je traject relaties hebt omgetagged van network=rwn naar network=lwn. Dit lijkt me niet correct. Volgende de wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Nederland_Wandelroutes#Tagging) worden zowel de trajectrelaties (de gekleurde rondwandelingen) als de netwerk relaties getagged als network=rwn. Het zou ook gek zijn als de paaltjes met een knooppunt tot rwn behoren maar de paden ertussen bij lwn. Op het forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=673311) is hier een discussie over gestart. Wellicht dus handig als je de wijzigingen revert.
dvdhoven (2017-11-19 09:15:53+00:00): Hallo Richard,

Je spreekt me aan of ik er geen verstand van heb en dat bevalt me niet. Dat vind ik geen goede toon.
Ik ben op het gebied van rwn en rcn één van de meest ervaren mappers momenteel.
Ik weet niet of je bekend bent met de tool van VMarc, http://osma.vmarc.be/nl/overview
Daarin kun je alle fouten vinden van rwn en rcn.
Het probleem van de gekleurde routes in Overijssel en de Achterhoek is, dat zij niet voldoen aan de eisen die aan een rwn route worden gesteld.
Een rwn route loopt van knooppunt naar knooppunt en deze gekleurde routes lopen over vele knooppunten heen, wat veel foutmeldingen oplevert in VMarc, die je niet anders kunt oplossen door ze in lwn te plaatsen. Vooral mapper A67-A67 is daar druk mee bezig geweest.
Daarom zijn er routes gemaakt, die wel aan de eisen van rwn voldoen. Dat zijn routes met een note als M75-M76 en die lopen van knooppunt, in Overijssel keuzepunt genoemd, naar knooppunt.
De aansluiting met de gekleurde routes is momenteel niet goed, daar moet nog een oplossing voor gevonden worden.
Als je het topic goed leest, zie je ook dat de topicstarter mulimodaal dat ook aan geeft. Hij geeft ook aan dat de gekleurde routes in het lwn thuis horen. Iets wat ik men hem eens ben.
Ik ga dan ook geen gekleurde routes in het rwn plaatsen. Sterker nog, als jij het doet, dan staan ze zo weer in het lwn.
A67-A67 en ik hebben ervoor gezorgd dat het aantal foutmeldingen in het rwn een stuk is terug gebracht en dat moet verder omlaag. Niet omhoog.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
DoDoMR (2016-12-02 17:01:53+00:00): Seit wann ist ein Jugendclub, ein Gericht? Habe das als "öffentlichen Treffpunkt" geändert. Ich gehe davon aus, dass das dennoch das gleiche Gebäude, wie das Bürgerhaus ist, auch wenn es möglicherweise unterschiedliche Eingänge gibt.
Kellerassel (2016-12-02 19:17:54+00:00): nein es ist eigeständiges Gebäude
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:26:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435343 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44111651 because there was a problem with licence of data use
user_5359 (2016-12-02 17:02:41+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:16:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
DoDoMR (2016-12-02 17:05:24+00:00): Hierbei handelt es sich doch nicht um ein Hotel, sondern um eine Pension. daher ist tourism=hotel nicht korrekt, sondern tourism=guest_house
Kellerassel (2016-12-02 19:11:09+00:00): Danke ja ist richtig Danke
user_5359 (2016-12-02 17:02:16+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-02 17:01:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mueschel (2016-12-04 21:29:16+00:00): Hi,
was heißt "rathausplatz=2" an diesem Parkplatz?
gmbo (2016-12-04 22:07:37+00:00): Ich hatte die Angabe  bekommen, dass sich inm Parkhaus unterhalb des Rathausplatzes 2 ein ausgewiesener Motoradparkplatz mit 4 Stellplätzen befindet.
Die Zufahrt wäre von der Altenauer Str.
highflyer74 (2016-12-05 14:40:33+00:00): Moin gmbo!

Das Tagging passt da noch nicht so ganz, wie mueschel schon angedeutet hat. Es geht speziell um https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4533810508. Wenn die Position nicht genau bekannt ist, dann könntest Du die Dir vorliegenden Informationen in das schon vorhandene fixme=* schreiben. Es ist nur etwas unglücklich durch "Rathausplatz=2" einen neuen Key zu erfinden.

Viele Grüße!
gmbo (2016-12-05 15:49:03+00:00): Ich wollte keinen neuen Key erfinden, wenn dann müsste mir da ein Tippfehler passiert sein, aber ich habe da ein Addr-Tag angehängt Straße und Hausnummer wie das in einigen Städten gemacht wird. Ich gehe davon aus dass der Augang in Rathausplatz 2 ist.
Würde den Parkplatz bei meinem nächsten Besuch in Lüdenscheid anfahren um ihn selbst zu Korregiern wenn nicht vorher jemand da war und dann das Fixme entfernt.
user_5359 (2016-12-02 16:57:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3625648379 ? Are there two restaurants with the same name??

If you need help: You are welcome!
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:25:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435332 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44112065 because there was a problem with licence of data use
Osm1980 (2017-01-29 21:21:27+00:00): سلام اینجا چجور جایی هست؟ پمپ بنزینه یا تعمیرگاه؟
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:14:00+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:21:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435272 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44112262 because there was a problem with licence of data use
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:16:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
literan (2016-12-03 13:09:38+00:00): зачем вы удалили название колледжа и поставили туда какую-то контору, оставив все прочие теги?  так нельзя, я откачу.
bezdna (2016-12-04 10:34:29+00:00): @literan, Я изменил название, т.к. Работаю в этой "какой-то конторе", которая в 2015г сменила название с Академии жкк на Роскапстрой. На сайте (который указан мной же в тэгах к этому объекту) четко об этом написано. Очень хорошо что вы следите за правками в этом районе, но пожалуйста, сперва уточняйте информацию, прежде чем откатывать такие правки. Верните, пожалуйста, мою правку, чтобы не раздувать историю изменений объекта бессмысленной войной правок. Я ответственно подхожу к картированию ОСМ, т.к. использую базу в профессиональных целях.
literan (2016-12-04 12:42:41+00:00): Для того, чтобы не возникало таких недоразумений, принято обосновывать (комментировать) правки. Я вижу на сайте этой организации, что ее осн. функция теперь: "В соответствии с уставом ФАУ «РосКапСтрой» предметом деятельности Учреждения является осуществление в установленном порядке функций заказчика в сфере строительства, реконструкции объектов капитального строительства, осуществляемых за счет средств федерального бюджета" (образ. функция дополнительная) - раз это так, то 
то надо сменить теги на гос. учреждение. Все верно?
bezdna (2016-12-04 12:51:42+00:00): Формлально образовательная функция дополнительная, но пока не совсем так. Сменить с образовательного на гос учреждение можно, но я бы сделал это как минимум в январе.

Насчет комментирования правок замечание разумное, но и откат правок стоит все же делать обоснованно. Давайте не будем вступать в полемику по такому тривиальному вопросу, а лучше это время посвятим картированию OSM. Согласны?
literan (2016-12-04 13:21:54+00:00): поводов для полемики я не вижу здесь, все достаточно однозначно. А почему в январе?
bezdna (2016-12-04 17:29:10+00:00): Направление деятельности в гос учреждениях переходит в разряд основного чуть медленнее, чем на бумаге:) В здании только-только закончился ремонт для новых отделов, занимающихся основным видом деятельности.