piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JohnDoe23 (2020-10-03 08:34:42+00:00): Hallo Wurstsalatsepp,

erstmal Herzlich Willkommen und schön, dass du an der Verbesserung von Openstreetmap beiträgst.

Leider sind bei deiner Bearbeitung mehrere Fehler entstanden. Dies ist wohl hauptsächlich dem Editor Vespucci geschuldet. Vespucci ist eher dafür gedacht, mal schnell einen Point of Interest einzutragen, für die Bearbeitung von Wegen ist es weniger geeignet. Ich würde für die Bearbeitung von Wegen Editoren wie z.B. iD (Browserapp mit Touchtunterstützung) z.B. über ein Tablet oder PC empfehlen, das macht auch mehr Spaß.

Beispiele für Fehler:
Weg war bereits verhanden, jetzt sind überlappende Wege eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790450961
Weg nicht mit vorhandenen Wegen verbunden, Überlappungen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850463514
Trail (S1) ist kein Name, sondern ein Wegattribut: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793871310
Objekt ohne Attribute: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817908706

Diese Fehler verursachen derzeit z.B. Probleme in Routingapps.

Gruß JohnDoe
Frans S (2020-04-13 13:33:27+00:00): Hello
Please square the buildings you map with the Q key in ID editor
Check the wiki about tagging highways for a good understanding which road how to tag
Best regards
TZorn (2020-04-20 15:12:31+00:00): Hallo BlueG,

warum ersetzt du denn maxspeed=* durch maxspeed:type=*? Es wäre zwar schön, wenn ein Datenkonsument automatisch ein maxspeed=50 annehmen würde, wenn er ms:type=DE:urban sähe, aber so weit sind wir, denke ich, noch lange nicht. Alleine die Verwendung von maxspeed:type (gegenüber source:maxspeed) ist ja schon umstritten. Könntest du explizit getaggte maxspeed-Werte bitte nicht löschen.
BlueG (2020-04-20 18:01:21+00:00): Da ist wohl was schiefgegangen, das war so nicht gewollt. Habe ich gerade korrigiert.
Frans S (2020-04-13 10:53:21+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here
A request. 
Please review your knowledge about tagging highways. You use track where Unclassified is a better option. ( Public road) The same road a bit further on has been tagged as tertiary. Please read the wiki about that!
Best regards
eggie (2020-04-10 18:56:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
kayle (2020-04-17 07:38:56+00:00): Zdravím,
prosím dávajte si pozor, keď značíte chodník nespájajte ho s riekou. Samozrejme ak tam je brod, tak ho treba spojiť (a označiť, že tam je brod), ale podľa všetkého je tam most.
VA00 (2020-04-11 06:20:59+00:00): Gra warta świeczki. Ale szkoda mi tej starej drogi wprost do Podgórza (szlaku czarnego). Tam też jest wydzielona działka pod drogę (2856), i to aż do ul. Tenczyńskiej. Ale aby  ją odtworzyć, potrzeba czegoś więcej niż bushcraftu...
pan_borsuk (2020-04-11 11:46:26+00:00): orzesz w d... jaka ta 2856 jest długaśna! nigdy nie jechałem nią od Tenczyńskiej zaczynając.

jeszcze przyjdzie czas na odnowienie tego szlaku aż pod sam dom 16A. spokojnie

jest ciut porządków do zrobienia!.. WSZĘDZIE 🧔
Tedd Santana (2020-04-11 13:11:01+00:00): Olá Qualhano, estou respondendo ao seu pedido de revisão, mas sem fazer alterações nos elementos que você criou. Por favor, considere que meus comentários refletem o meu entendimento baseado em diversas documentações que li. Ou seja, não é um combinado com outros colaboradores, OK? Com relação ao número de faixas, no caso de vias com superfície de chão, eu prefiro não indicar faixas, pois de fato não há faixas pintadas na pista de rolamento. Mesmo em estradas asfaltadas as vezes não há faixas. Se o seu objetivo é indicar que a estrada comporta dois veículos passando simultaneamente em sentidos opostos, você pode usar a etiqueta width=* para indicar a largura da via em metros. Mas é mesmo difícil saber isso somente olhando a imagem de satélite. E também é algo que varia ao longo da via. Esta documentação pode ajudar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:lanes  Outra coisa é que se a via comporta dois veículos em sentidos opostos e tem superfície de solo compactado, ela pode ser classificada como via terciária. Eu uso mesmo é superfície de chão (ground), pois penso que compactada é aquela estrada que está passando por obras e foi terraplanada e compactada com aqueles rolos pesados. Este diagrama pode ajudar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/1/12/Br-classification-flowchart-pt.png
Outra coisa ainda é o limite de velocidade. Vejo que você estabelece 40 Km/h em vias locais ou vicinais. Eu não tenho informação sobre velocidade permitida nestas vias. Como não há placas eu optei por não informar velocidade. Se você tiver alguma documentação sobre isso, ficarei feliz se enviar o link para mim. Por favor, informe se alguma de minhas considerações não estiverem adequadas, pois gosto de aprender sempre mais sobre o que faço. Forte abraço.
Qualhano (2020-04-11 13:27:16+00:00): Bom dia Tedd.
Quanto a velocidade das vias, tirando as pavimentadas que se for estadual tem limite de 80km ou 60 se for do tipo de caminho do campo, parei de por o limite de 40km (usava o limite médio de tráfego de uma estrada vicinal), não estou atribuindo mais quando faço o mapeamento.
Quanto o piso da via quando faço o mapeamento utilizo o compactação, não pensando somente no mecânico, utilizado para a pavimentação da via, mais no natural de utilização do dia a dia.
Esse, também é um entendimento do pessoal do grupo do Telegram, aqui do Espírito Santo.
Fico grato pelas orientações das possíveis falhas.
VA00 (2020-04-11 06:15:33+00:00): 3 metry szerokości? Serio? Weź poprawkę na to, że obecnie jest pora najlepszej widoczności. Za 2-3miesiące wszystko zarośnie na amen. Kilka razy tam zjeżdżałem w dół, ale nie miałem wrażenia że poruszam się po ,,ścieżce''. Raczej na azymut na przełaj przez las. Oznaczenie trail_visibility=no konieczne, ewentualnie trail_visibility=horrible jak trochę się oczyści.
pan_borsuk (2020-04-11 11:37:50+00:00): tam w górnej części 3m bez dwóch zdań a w dolnej no może z 1,5-2

zmieniam widoczność na słabszą 👍
alesarrett (2021-04-12 14:56:49+00:00): Ciao, questo changeset sembra descrivere un import. Da che fonte sono derivati questi dati?
Sei a conoscenza della procedura di import di dati esterni in OpenStreetMap? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Import/Guidelines)
Константин Гам (2020-04-18 16:03:22+00:00): Обрисовывая снимки стоит не додумывать, а рисовать что на снимке. А также ВНИМАТЕЛЬНО смотреть что вы рисуете, а то получается навигация по service в обрыв 3 метра вниз...  

Если вы не знаете вместо лично, лучше побывать там, прежде чем бездумно срисовывать
fims7 (2020-04-18 16:08:35+00:00): Я Вас правильно понял что ненужно ДУМАТЬ (додумывать)?
Можно узнать в чем конкретна проблема с корой Вы обратились?
Reeniz (2020-04-10 18:28:00+00:00): Cual es motivo de cambiar el nombre a uno errado?  Por favor no editar cosas que no conoce.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83377863
mappylite (2020-04-14 16:36:16+00:00): Hola. El nombre anterior de la calle estaba equivocado, ya que decía "Diego Barrios Ortiz". Quería copiar el nombre correcto de la calle de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555574907 que es "Diego Barros Ortiz". Hice ese cambio un par de veces, los arreglaré.
Reeniz (2020-04-14 16:56:42+00:00): Buena observacion. Saludos!.
ALu68 (2020-04-11 08:16:21+00:00): Hallo Bruby22, willkommen bei OSM.
Danke für deine Verbesserungen.

Bitte überdenke die Namen deiner Objekte.
"Einer der Quellbäche des Biberbachs" & "Eine der 4 Quellen des Biberbachs" sind keine Namen.
Du kannst Beschreibungen als description hinzufügen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description

Wenn ein Objekt keinen Namen hat, muss man auch keinen angeben - es gibt jedoch auch Alternativen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name?uselang=de

Im wiki findest du wertvolle Erläuterungen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Annotations

Happy Mapping.
Bruby22 (2020-04-11 09:06:46+00:00): Hallo ALu68,
vielen Dank für deine Hinweise. Hab die Bezeichnungen bereits gelöscht.
Im Eglesee findet manauf der Karte  eine Bezeichnung "Biberquelle". Die kann doch nicht stimmen? Könntest du dir das mal ansehen.
Ich bräuchte auch Nachhilfeunterricht: Ich habe 3 kleine Holzbrücken zum Einzeichnen, finde aber unter Objekt keine "Brücken". Wie kann man Brücken einzeichnen? Ich bedanke mich schon jetzt für deine Hilfe!
Ich wünsche dir schöne Ostern und bleib gesund!
Herzliche Grüße
Bruby22
ALu68 (2020-04-11 09:42:26+00:00): Wenn du in der Karte auf "Chronik anzeigen" klickst, siehst du alle Änderungen und die Mapper. 
Du kannst die Mapper direkt fragen oder falls du Fehler erkennst, kannst du es natürlich korrigieren.

>> ... unter Objekt keine "Brücken"
Ich arbeite lieber mit JOSM: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/

Informationsquellen:
1. Du kannst dir die Schlüssel von den vorhandenen Objekten ansehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556076494
2. Detailierte Informationen findest du im wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bridge?uselang=de
3. Im Forum werden viele Fragen behandelt - nur bedingt nutzbar: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=163634

Danke und auch Frohe Ostern.
Andre
Bruby22 (2020-04-14 11:27:24+00:00): Hallo Andre,
vielen Dank für deine Hinweise und Tipps.
Herzliche Grüße und bleib gesund!
Werner
seattlefyi (2020-04-10 23:16:36+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Edits look good, though I might suggest capitalizing the first letter of "Jefferson Beach Dock". Thanks, hope to see more edits!
Mark R Naird (2020-05-12 21:44:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mapman44 (2020-04-11 02:01:08+00:00): Hello, Samtrigote. Please leave brief comments explaining what edits you made in the changeset. That is a basic good practice that is expected of all OSM editors. Here is the Wiki article that explains this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83378280
Frans S (2020-06-01 14:22:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please review this document and follow the guidelines at next mappings .
Thanks and keep mapping
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
https://crowd2map.slack.com/files/U4AK0AARJ/F013HACFQ3X/crowd2map_get_started_rev_5c.pdf
Frans S (2020-06-01 14:33:42+00:00): Pleas pay more attention on accurate mapping of buildings. Your mappings are often oversized and a few not squared
Best regards
eggie (2020-04-10 19:30:44+00:00): Het wordt nog wat daar. living_street alleen als er een bord woonerf staat. Dan klopt maxspeed 15 inderdaad! 
Up to you. Jij bent de lokale mapper. 
Op veel van die parken wordt vaak highway=service gebruikt. Dat is zo gegroeid en wellicht niet eens de geëigende tag. 
Wanneer het officieel  woonerf is zal het openbare weg zijn en is een accesstag niet nodig. Ziet er verder netjes uit.
MVG,
Eggie
DaveF (2020-04-11 00:07:09+00:00): Please do not delete valid data. amenity=pub/supermarket belong on the boundary way which encompasses all land owned by those companies. 
Similar to schools.
i hope you haven't removed other examples elsewhere.
DaveF (2020-04-11 00:15:48+00:00): Larkhall is not the city. Have you considered editing only in your area where you'll have local knowledge?
CjMalone (2020-04-11 15:48:09+00:00): The wiki for Tag:shop=supermarket says area along the "shop outline". Not like Tag:landuse=retail that says "an area containing the whole of the retail area: the shops and car parks." or Tag:amenity=school that says "Mark the boundary of the school" So I think it should be on the building, like I changed it to, and how it is in all other areas of OSM that I've seen. But if you have an argument otherwise I'm happy to hear it.

As for your second comment I find it a bit rude and narrow minded. Is OSM only allowing local mappers? I could be rude too and ask why an amazing local mapper like yourself hasn't added the postoffice in Larkhall? But I don't want to be rude, I want OSM to be the best map.

I'm happy for it to be changed to addr:suburb=Larkhall, addr:city=Bath.
Sunng (2020-04-12 03:58:53+00:00): 根据 wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways

除非道路中央有物理隔离，如绿化带，不建议把道路标记成两条单向的 way，会造成数据冗余和难以维护
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-04-21 07:45:57+00:00): Hallo zumd,

den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790530262 hast Du mit surface=ground getaggt. Das wäre purer Erdboden ohne eine Befestigung (Trampelpfad).
Ist das richtig?

Gruß Roger Wilco
zumd (2020-04-21 08:19:06+00:00): Ja, das war so.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-04-21 08:26:48+00:00): Hmm. Das kann ich kaum glauben, da es auf den Luftbildern nach einem befestigten Weg aussieht.
zumd (2020-04-26 17:26:28+00:00): Ist feiner Schotter. Läuft parallel zu einer Hofeinfahrt, wahrscheinlich daher.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-04-26 19:23:28+00:00): Feiner Schotter wäre dann aber eine Befestigung: surface=compacted. Ground ist pure Erde, wie bei einem Trampelpfad über eine Wiese oder im Wald.
Connecticut (2020-07-16 06:28:10+00:00): Siehe Note:
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2265123#map=19/47.28233/8.14005&layers=N
   
Pfad:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/790534956#map=17/47.28482/8.13792&layers=N

 ?
czubi (2020-04-11 12:54:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7001752099
warum ist das jetzt bicycle=desingnated?
czubi (2020-04-11 12:54:35+00:00): sorry, das hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24227948
Tocosibirsk (2020-04-11 13:37:30+00:00): weil ein Verkehrsschild DE:240 ausgangs Nazza (wo der highway=service anfängt) genau das aussagt. Sieht seltsam aus, is aber so, foot=designated gehört anfürsich auch dran
(wunder mich gerade, dass ichs nicht dazugeschrieben hatte. Kann ich ja noch machen)
Tocosibirsk (2020-04-11 13:44:41+00:00): Achso, ich sehs grad. Oben am Highway=service stehts dran. Am Übergang zum track (das hab ich so von den Vorgängerversionen übernommen) gibts nicht nochmal ne Beschilderung, und auf der anderen Seite war ich unaufmerksam und kann nicht sagen ob und wenn ja was da für Schilder rumstehen. Im Sinne des Erfinders sollte das aber so passen, unterstell ich jetzt mal ..
czubi (2020-04-11 15:17:56+00:00): Für mich passts eher nicht. Der erste Teil ist bis auf das segrergated=no fehlt richtig, geschenkt.
Am südlichen Teil fehlt schon foot=designated, segregated=no und motor_vehicle=destination. Ich hätte es auch eingebessert aber leider fehlen dort auch die VZ. Ich bessers ein, danke fürs schauen
JezCrow (2020-04-10 20:59:06+00:00): Hi CjMalone,
addr:city=Saltburn ??? I'm assuming OSM copies RM's 'post towns' for addr:city fields? I know I'm relatively new to the project, but it seems to me that just because a private company uses a town 10 miles away for its address database doesn't mean OSM should be following their format, though I'm happy to be corrected if that is the agreed method.
Happy mapping,
Jez
CjMalone (2020-04-10 21:26:14+00:00): My goal with this was to add the postcode, and secondarily the FHRS id, so truthfully I didn't pay much attention to the city.

However FHRS (https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/243858) suggests addr:village=Staithes, addr:city=Saltburn.

Post Office Ltd for a nearby Post Office in Mickleby, still in TS13 (https://osm.mathmos.net/postoffice/branch/16126, not on OSM yet) suggests addr:village=Mickleby, addr:city=Saltburn-by-the-Sea.

I think addr:village=Staithes, addr:city=Saltburn-by-the-Sea is probably the best.
JezCrow (2020-04-11 19:30:28+00:00): Ahh, I didn't realise there was other options like addr:village because the wiki only mentions addr:city for the place name. Thanks.
CjMalone (2020-04-11 19:49:58+00:00): I only know about because I've seen it used, primarily on Post Offices. Wiki slightly mentions it on a talk page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:addr#Key_addr:village_introduced) and TagInfo shows it's in use (https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain/keys/addr%3Avillage).

I'll let you make the edit since you caught it.
pyram (2020-04-26 12:28:56+00:00): Hallo MapperNews,

warum hast Du hier eine Brücke im Bau eingetragen bzw. entsprechend abgeändert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584956464/history
Diese Brücke ist bislang nur geplant, aber nicht im Bau.
Ebenso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/584956468

Gruß
pyram
Tomas Straupis (2020-04-11 06:26:47+00:00): Reverted this and all other changes in Lithuania. Please be careful, you're editing a live database.
dmlu (2020-04-10 21:39:17+00:00): Danke! :)
village (2020-04-11 15:45:56+00:00): Quelle: Frage bei Anwohnern
SHARCRASH (2021-09-06 17:32:47+00:00): Hi m sator! You added this relation a year ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10983310 What's your source for  having included ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476112566 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368313920 
The problem is that this last track is restricted to cyclists, see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2447715
m sartor (2021-09-09 19:59:32+00:00): Hello, sorry for the late answer, thanks for reminding me, while I did a lot of edits I always forgot to take this one out, I did it now.  When I added it there was no sign forbidding cyclists, the road was bumpy but open. It was a useful connection for Soleuvre's cycle network. So sad to see that they do not care to give soft mobility access to industrial zones. Soleuvre commune told me the signs of their network will be renewed mid-2021 but except on PC8 nothing has been done... about my question of this connection I got no answer. We will see
SHARCRASH (2021-09-10 12:59:30+00:00): Thank you for clearing the situation out!
Mark R Naird (2020-05-04 21:42:19+00:00): May you please be so nice to tell what you've mapped? "BDOrtho IGN" is already stated in the source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-07 00:59:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110823595 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, and a discussion with the user, reverting some changesets that used Google as a source.
os-emmer (2024-02-19 19:48:02+00:00): Hi Matsayz,
you mapped something with amenity=emergency_service in this hospital. This tag was documented to be used for some kind of disaster response organisation mainly in Germany but is now deprecated. What is the meaning of this tag?
BCNorwich (2020-04-12 18:42:47+00:00): Hi, You've placed RS50 on top of an existing highway. If a way needs amending the correct method is to amend the existing highway. Your duplication highway on top of highway will disrupt routing. Please remove the duplication, correct your mapping or revert this changeset.
I also see you are still adding fictitious names, RS50 is the highway reference number.
If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
Georgecrozer (2020-04-12 21:49:51+00:00): Hi Bernard 
You will appreciate I’m new to this and would of course want it to be right! RS 50 is of course it’s local authority designation . I’m pretty sure it’s not known locally by any other name. It’s also a right of way . Is the correct way not to use the “locally known by” option and define it’s designation in the appropriate place?
Also if it is also a track or highway that too should be defined under designation? So only use the locally known by option if it is locally known by a name ?
So the RS 50 line should join the highway and the highway have more than one designation??
Is that correct?
George
BCNorwich (2020-04-13 07:47:03+00:00): Hi George, 
I understand new folks problems, 
OSM has evolved to follow fairly regular patterns of mapping (good practice). Though a lot of folk disagree on some minor points, most mappers agree to stick to a worked out by consensus method. This is what I'm trying to put across.
I've now tagged the path correctly from your information so you can see it.
I notice that you might be using your GPS trace to draw the path. Your path line is not consistent with the aerial imagery available. Please be aware the GPS trace is likely to bounce about quite a lot. Therefore I've adjusted the path line.
You placed the bridge on the stream which like this has no relevance to the path. I've removed the stream bridge, then divided the path line, to insert a bridge on the path over the stream. The layer=1 tag indicates the feature (The bridge) is above any other feature it crosses over unjoined to.

You've deleted the section where RS50 was on top of another highway so I can't now amend that. If there's an existing way track or road that you want to amend to be a public path, say for instance RS50 runs down the unclassified Buckhole Farm Road.
Then the road tags could be amended to :- description=From Cooling Road (adjacent to Childs Farm) to Decoy Hill Road
designation=public_footpath
foot=yes
highway=unclassified
name=Buckhole Farm Road
prow_ref=RS 50
source:name=OS_OpenData_Locator
source=survey;Bing

Sorry the above is so long.. 
Regards Bernard.
Georgecrozer (2020-04-13 10:54:55+00:00): Thanks Bernard 
I did use a GPS trace for the extension to white road, as the Ariel imagery showed only the tree covering. RS 50 was difficult to correct as I had to disconnect each and every node ( a lessen well learnt ? (and you may show me a quicker way to do that). With RS 50 I think its important to show the historically correct route across the field east of Buckhole farm and not the route shown further east and close to the field boundary. I have some further observations to make in the north east corner of field before deleting it as I believe some of the path is use although not a right of way.
Thanks for your help its much appreciate. We are working to inform our neighbourhood plan of green spaces and rights way etc etc.
jpennycook (2020-04-10 22:24:07+00:00): Changes in Bentworth (Sun Hill, Childer Lane) based on bike ride a week ago
dmlu (2020-06-18 08:00:57+00:00): Moien,
Sinn Autoen ob dëser Stréck net erlaabt? Ech froen wéngst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2231720
canfe (2020-11-27 10:04:20+00:00): No non è un tunnel è una colonnade.
Toglierlo da tutti portici prego.
Matthias Frank (2020-11-28 20:40:03+00:00): Fatto! Ho levato il tag "tunnel" da tutti i portici nella zona dove l'avevo messo io.
Tanti saluti, Matthias
BCNorwich (2020-04-11 07:39:49+00:00): Hi, I've placed your new data (for all building POI) on the existing building outlines. Tagged the building as building=apartments and amended the postcodes.
Regards Bernard.
berndw (2020-04-13 10:43:10+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei Openstreetmap

Die Höhe eines Punktes wird nicht als Teil des Namens angeben, sondern mit der Angabe eines Keys ele=*
Ich korrigiere das
Name ist immer nur der Name

Bernd
IanH (2020-04-16 03:46:56+00:00): For changeset 83383369, you deleted a grove of trees. Are the trees gone or is it the tags wrong?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83383369
geauxtiger (2020-04-16 12:44:05+00:00): The groves of trees were causing the the golf program to import no trees in that area at all. I can put that area back now that we are done with designing the course.
sanchi (2020-04-11 08:30:42+00:00): Hello
I have seen that you are removing exit_to and adding destination. You are doing it incorrectly. The destination does not go on the highway = motorway_junction node, but on the highway = motorway_link exit path.
Here you have it explained
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
Please correct it and do it correctly from now on.
Regards.
marcoSt (2020-04-11 10:34:08+00:00): Hello sanchi,

Thank you for your link. 

JOSM says for some weeks this tagging with "exit_to" has to be old-fashioned and should be changed to "destination".  

Obviously there is a new tagging policy to introduce. If it will so, than is this linking side and in the way other sides not up to date. That means, we have a lot of work to do.

Who programs this bullshit for JOSM, now? Thank you for letting me know. 

Best regards
Marco