piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Epheo (2020-09-29 13:45:23+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur! I had originally reclassified the road to residential since there was no difference in aerial imagery between this road and many other residential roads nearby. As there is no ground level imagery in OSM for me to use currently, I based my findings on nearby data and the aerial imagery too. However, I will keep your suggestions and the Forum post you cited in mind going forward.
Thanks for the ground level imagery, and I agree that the track classification is a better choice for this road. I can change the classification back. Thanks for reaching out!
Pedro Guerra (2020-09-25 22:11:57+00:00): Errata: Toponímia - freguesia do Lumiar.
skfd (2020-09-28 22:48:27+00:00): Привет! Почему cycleway если там можно и ходиииить
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91533303
Viterall (2020-09-28 22:55:19+00:00): привет. никто ж не спорит что можно, можно и взлетке самолетов ходить) а эта тропа прочищена для велосипедистов и используется больше ими
FinB2000 (2020-09-25 22:29:41+00:00): This only reverted changeset 90824237.
BCNorwich (2020-09-26 06:55:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've adjusted the building outline to the actual building rather than the whole premises.
Added the website.
Regards Bernard.
Sunesun (2020-09-26 06:46:01+00:00): This Change on OSM has been changed and Closed. I am not sure why and by who.
Hjart (2020-09-26 10:56:53+00:00): Du taggede firmaet på et hjørne af bygningen, hvilket kan være lidt uheldigt. Derfor er det flyttet til en ny node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7944268114
pza (2020-09-25 23:30:28+00:00): For more details - https://www.westconnex.com.au/media/m0kcypyc/rozelle-interchange-n0176-iron-cove-link-weekly-update-september-2.pdf
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-26 07:16:00+00:00): Hi MauiEngTech, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped drive ways? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=91534262

If a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
MauiEngTech (2020-09-28 21:00:01+00:00): the driveways i deleted were either private gated driveways and do not have public access or were not driveways in the first place, a couple of them were just dirt access roads on private land for farming. 
Your comment about not deleting driveways just changing the access to no or private. 
First off i dont agree with that, do you want your driveway mapped for the entire world to see? I know i dont. Also are you advocating to add all driveways even in cities? (can you imagine how cluttered and virtually unreadable it would become?).
We also need to keep in mind this map is an open forum used by GIS platforms as their basemaps adding driveways confuses the systems and muddies up the roadways (again think of the mess it would look like), as in when your looking at the basemap there is no difference in a road way vs a driveway, it makes it look like its a road when its not. And your point of just changing the access doesnt apply in these cases because the GIS systems do not differentiate what is public access and what isnt. Which by definition a private driveway is not public access. Now if were talking a driveways into a place of business (open to the public) or a governmental building thats different. 

Anyway those are my thoughts, and why i deleted them.
MikeN (2020-09-29 00:14:32+00:00): Hi MauiEngTech,  Thanks for your reply!

My driveway is already mapped for the entire world to see.  And that is a minor privacy issue considering that Bing and Google have a full street view of my house along with the address.   Since driveways are easily verifiable features, they can be added to the map.  There is a growing trend to add driveways for use by delivery drivers.  The presence of gates on the map prompt them to ensure that they can deliver without a wasted trip of being blocked by a gate.  They can aid emergency vehicle drives in finding driveway entrances even in poor visibility.  Uncluttered maps are created by filtering out features not needed for a particular map rendering.
   GIS programs using OSM as a basemap need to have filtering to exclude unwanted features - sidewalks for example are also under the 'highway' tag and would similarly create extra lines on a basemap.
RoundCircle (2020-09-26 00:11:51+00:00): https://www.theage.com.au/national/states-divided-between-diemen-and-deep-blue-sea-20050120-gdzefu.html

I believe these islets are disputed territory, hence the overlap.
RoundCircle (2020-09-26 00:17:44+00:00): PS. We will not yield to the attacks of the sovereignty of the state of Tasmania by mainlanders! ;)
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-06-14 01:43:35+00:00): helo alejandroAlba

trust you doing great to mapping.
i little bit curious about this area https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/851688782

there's several natural water in this area (argentine). would you mind to give me some information about characteristic land use of Argentina

1. what actually thing is it? natural lake spread around in this area. is this seasonal lake / swamp / wet land? any picture similar such this area?
2. there several road, crossing the water. caused crossing waterbody/ water area issue in osm. i wonder. is there road exist in field?
what main functional of this road, is there connecting farm land? or connection settlement?

3. several road are crossing waterbody, is that road accessible with motorcycle or car through the water?

I am glad if you can provide a little information about the characteristics of Argentina

=========================
Hola

confío en que estás haciendo un gran trabajo en mapas
Tengo un poco de curiosidad sobre esta área https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/851688782

hay varias aguas naturales en esta zona (argentina). ¿Le importaría darme alguna información sobre el uso característico del suelo de Argentina?

1. ¿Qué es realmente? lago natural esparcido por esta zona. ¿Es este lago / pantano / tierra húmeda estacional? ¿Alguna imagen similar a esta área?
2. Hay varios caminos, cruzando el agua. causó un problema de cruce de agua / cuerpo de agua en osm me pregunto. ¿Existe un camino en el campo?
¿Cuál es la función principal de esta carretera, hay tierras agrícolas conectadas? o liquidación de conexión?

3. Varias carreteras cruzan un cuerpo de agua, ¿se puede acceder a esa carretera con una motocicleta o un automóvil a través del agua?

Me alegra si puede brindarnos un poco de información sobre las características de Argentina.
AlejandroAlba (2021-07-09 22:01:55+00:00): Hola Riyadi.  (1)Estas son lagunas de poca profundidad que se forman en epocas de grandes lluvias. Esta zona esta afectada por el fenomeno "El Niño". El terreno es particularmente plano y el agua no tiene donde escurrir. Tardan hasta 8 años en secarse por completo y ser un terreno de cultivo nuevamente. (2)Los caminos son de uso publico, abiertos, no tienen realizada ninguna mejora excepto una nivelacion basica. Estan al mismo nivel que el terreno que los rodea. Por lo tanto, (3)cuando hay agua, no se pueden utilizar.   (Estos caminos deberian tener la etiqueta flood_prone )

***
Hello Riyadi. (1) These are shallow lagoons that form in times of heavy rains. This area is affected by the "El Niño" phenomenon. The terrain is particularly flat and the water has nowhere to drain. They take up to 8 years to completely dry out and be a farmland again. (2) The roads are for public use, open, they have not made any improvement except a basic leveling. They are at the same level as the surrounding terrain. Therefore, (3) when there is water, they cannot be used. (These paths should have the flood_prone tag)
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-07-12 03:47:03+00:00): Great AlejandroAlba , thank you for shared me about characteristic watery body in this area, especially in argentine. this information helpful for us. 
if any update data surround, feel free to keep in touch.

Greeting
iWowik (2020-10-05 15:06:59+00:00): Так православный или протестантский?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4157178491/history
Anisa IRM-ED (2021-06-16 07:01:56+00:00): hi, @AlejandroAlba
This waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/851695688) crossing several roads. We can see the difference in the Esri image where the road is submerged in the waterbody (intermittent) and the road is clearly visible based on Bing, the Maxar Premium (Beta) image. Could you tell us the type of road that crossed it? is it flood-prone or ford?

thank you, :)
Miftah IRM-ED (2021-06-16 07:45:19+00:00): Hi, AlejandroAlba. 
Trust you are doing great!
I found some highway crossing with this waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/851695708), would you mind fixing this issue? or please let me know if there's any update on this area.
Thank you and happy mapping!
snoozingnewt (2022-10-03 21:20:56+00:00): Hey, two years late but can you explain the rationale for changing the road classifications in this specific area? It looks really weird, especially using the humanitarian layer
nevw (2020-09-26 04:47:32+00:00): Hi Grahame80
I think the tanks also need to be tagged with
man_made=storage_tank and content=water .
The name is probably not needed then.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank
GrahR (2020-09-26 05:48:04+00:00): Hi nevw.
Thank for your suggestion. I am just starting to use OSM iD. Working my way through
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/, and using where I live to work on.
aweech (2020-09-26 23:17:35+00:00): Hi,
Where are the prior discussions about this import? I'm having trouble finding anything about it in the Wiki.
user_6771650 (2020-09-29 02:00:37+00:00): Hi, this is part of the National Hydrography Dataset import which has been going on for some time now. It is described on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/National_Hydrography_Dataset 

A few mappers have continued importing it in spots. But overall, it has been stagnant for some years, probably because it's a very tedious process to add the data without breaking something.
aweech (2020-09-29 18:43:47+00:00): The data that you uploaded is very low-quality in many places. Are you planning on going through and fixing it up?
aweech (2020-09-29 18:45:57+00:00): Also that page you linked to has a giant red warning saying to go through the import process. Can you link to the talk-us or imports list discussion required by the process? I searched the archives of both lists and couldn't find anything.
WatchPower (2020-09-26 02:49:52+00:00): aerial imagery
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-26 07:20:00+00:00): Hi NSmith0521, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several landuse' areas? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=91537199

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Claudius Henrichs (2020-10-02 08:47:43+00:00): Hi,
In OpenStreetMap so far the consensus has been to use railway=monorail for most automated people movers also like the APM100 model used in Guangzhou: See also this quote https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways#Types_of_railway_line 
"railway=monorail - A railway with only a single rail, often inner city and above street level. Also used for monorail-like automated people-mover systems"

The thinking is that APMs have more in common with monorails (because there is one [==mono] central guiding rail on the track and rubber tires are just running on a road like surface) than light rail infrastructure (which is usually iron/steel tracks). I would therefor recommend to revert your tagging change and use monorail tagging instead.
user_11435438 (2020-10-02 09:06:21+00:00): Fine. Just change it.
Claudius Henrichs (2020-10-05 07:32:35+00:00): Thanks for your understanding. I've updated the tagging in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91965792

Some good news: There is a relatively new tagging that allows to specify that this is a rubber tyres monorail by adding monorail=rubber_tyres - I have added this information to the infrastructure.
user_11435438 (2020-10-05 08:08:54+00:00): Great! Better with the new tagging.
naveenpf (2020-10-01 10:39:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91538363
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-27 00:45:31+00:00): Hi W!bble,
your highway digitizing is good. But, crossing highway/waterway, 
please check https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/672257954
I have fixed it.
Thanks
tastrax (2020-10-05 09:54:37+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
radiotrefoil (2020-09-26 04:51:56+00:00): Hello, good work you are doing. Feel free to add multiple houses per changeset if you want.
user_5359 (2020-09-26 05:13:01+00:00): Sorry for the large range of changes, unfortunately an operating error in JOSM (but all changes as requested)
elgolfo (2020-09-27 20:28:35+00:00): Hi Stefan,
bei deinen Änderungen in Bohnsdorf:
Warum hast du aus hw=path hw=footway gemacht? Sind die Wege mit Zeichen 239 beschildert?
Bei den Wegen, wo du bicycle=no getaggt hast: stehen da Verbotsschilder, die das Radfahren verbieten (als ich da letztens langfuhr, sind mir keine aufgefallen)?

Viele Grüße
Moritz
StefanHRT (2020-09-28 05:50:17+00:00): Guten Morgen noch einmal, Dies ist ehrlich gesagt eine Ansichtssache unter Berücksichtigung der Allgemeinheit (und auch dem "ewigen Kampf" zwischen FUßgängern, Radfahrern und dem motorisierten Verkehr. Wo ich da lang bin haben mich die Anwohner im Wohngebiet ermahnt, das dies Gehwege sind und keine Radwege. Der eine Weg führt obendrein zu einem Spielplatz. Ich finde ehrlich gesagt den Fußweg dadurch passender als den Pfad (der zu allgemein ist und den Fußweg auch beinhaltet). Beim Krankenhausgebiet sollten die Wege auch nicht für jedermann gültig sein, obendrein gilt in der aktuellen Lage (Corona) das man Krankenhausgelände nur mit "Berechtigung" betreten/befahren darf. Sicher es gibt dort überall keine generellen Verbotsschilder, aber hier sollte die Vernunft Vorrang haben. Ein gutes Beispiel: Berlin hat nicht mehr viele benutzungspflichtige Radwege, bei vielen wurden die Schilder entfernt und ab und an die Schilder "Radfahrer frei" angebracht. Nimmt man hier jetzt die Markierung für die Radwege raus oder lässt man diese vernünftigerweise drin damit man die Radfahrer nicht unnötiger Gefahr aussetzt? 

Wie Du siehst, ist dies hier in dem Fall wirklich eine Glaubens-/Ansichtssache.

VIele Grüße Stefan
aharvey (2020-09-27 06:02:53+00:00): The tag for driveways is highway=service + service=driveway, I've fixed this.
eggie (2020-09-26 08:09:02+00:00): Website aangepast https://kustschool.nl/
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-26 08:08:08+00:00): Website aangepast https://bsdenieuwevandale.nl/
MVG,
Eggie
Ropino (2020-10-15 09:20:48+00:00): Hallo,
ich bitte um Überprüfung der Adresse von:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/681054601#map=19/49.06762/12.90063&layers=D
gs3§zba (2020-10-15 16:29:42+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, Ropino. Habe es korrigiert. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92533980
SomeoneElse (2020-10-17 12:13:16+00:00): Do you have any source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7944116865 other than http://www.ukairfieldguide.net/airfields/Siege-Cross-Farm , which is heavily dependent on Google and therefore can't be used in OSM?
I don't see anything on the ground suggesting that it is in-use as an airstrip currently.  Old Mapbox imagery just about suggests and old airstrip here, but more up to date imagery suggests no longer.
arvdk (2020-09-30 14:20:07+00:00): Hoi P.
Van het noordelijke deel van de Vossiusstraat is de tag oneway:bicycle=no weggehaald. Fietsers kunnen nu dus niet meer twee kanten op. Was dat expres?
Groetjes, arvdk
eggie (2020-09-30 14:47:57+00:00): Dag pitdicker,
oneway:bicycle en oneway:moped weer toegevoegd ook aan omliggende straten. 
Wat is de reden van het samenvoegen van straten? 
Het wordt niet voor niets ontraden. 
. 
Ben wel benieuwd.
MVG,
Eggie
arvdk (2020-10-01 05:32:48+00:00): Bedankt, ik was nog langs gefietst gisteren, en het onderbord was inderdaad gewoon nog aanwezig. :)
pitdicker (2020-10-01 05:59:15+00:00): Hallo arvdk en Eggie. Bedankt weer voor jullie inzet!
De wijziging was overdacht, maar niet helemaal... De reden was dat voor alle straten met eenrichtingsverkeer in dit deel van Gouda er een uitzondering is voor fietsers (alleen Hoge Gouwe/Lage Gouwe weet ik niet zeker). En ik begreep niet waarom het bij dit kleine stukje werd aangegeven maar niet consequent. Na je reactie wilde ik voorstellen het bij alle straten in deze wijk met eenrichtingsverkeer de tag toe te voegen, maar dat heb je al gedaan, Eggie? Of zal ik ze nog nalopen?

Bedankt,
Paul Dicker
eggie (2020-10-01 06:44:06+00:00): Dag Paul..  alleen de aansluitende straten heb ik
.. oneway:bicycle=no en oneway:moped=no toegevoegd. Had even gespiekt op straatkijk.. De rest up to you..
.. mofa zou je ook nog kunnen bijtaggen.
Succes
Eggie
chlenix (2020-09-26 16:24:00+00:00): откатил, сломали весь перекресток Глибочицька/Верхній Вал и далее по Кожум'яцькій
ChookMan (2020-09-26 07:12:35+00:00): *Alabaster drive
Jakka (2020-09-27 07:49:27+00:00): Is dit de officiele naam van een resto of een persoonlijke note ? er is daar al een café
Sanderd17 (2020-09-29 10:36:12+00:00): Officiele naam is correct: https://memejulien.be/

Vraag is als vroegere café nog bestaat...
MrMoehritz (2020-11-01 19:37:09+00:00): Hey georalf,

du hast review_requested=yes angegeben deshalb mein Senf:
ich denke löschen war hier das beste denn als landmark zum z.B. rounten kann man es ja nicht mehr nutzen. Dann wäre disused:amenity=doctors gut gewesen.

happy mapping!
opendcc (2020-09-26 13:59:30+00:00): Hallo,

private Weg werden nicht gelöscht, sondern mit einem access-tag 'private' versehen. Damit sind diese für Routing tabu, aber z.B. für Feuerwehren noch sichtbar.
Connecticut (2020-09-27 07:27:31+00:00): wie wohl das Verbotsschild aussieht? einen Waldweg für Fußgänger ist in Österreich nicht leicht zu sperren.
maxodermoritz (2020-09-27 07:53:29+00:00): Ich weiß sehr wohl daß man in Österreich den Wald betreten darf. Es gibt aber auch Ausnahmen, z. B. Jungbestand. Der eingezeichnete Pfad ist eher eine Rückegasse als ein Fußweg. Also löschen
Connecticut (2020-09-27 07:57:58+00:00): ah ja, jetzt wird aus einem "Forstweg" eine "Rückegasse". Weißt du wie aktuelle Luftbilder für diesen Bereich aussehen?
maxodermoritz (2020-09-27 08:07:59+00:00): 
Ich weiß wie es in der Natur aussieht, du sicher nicht und kenn auch das Orthofoto, da sieht man keinen Weg
 §33 Forstgesetz 1c
Wiederbewaldungsflächen sowie Neubewaldungsflächen, diese unbeschadet des § 4 Abs. 1, solange deren Bewuchs eine Höhe von drei Metern noch nicht erreicht hat.
Connecticut (2020-09-27 09:04:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2364611
PPete2 (2020-09-28 15:09:41+00:00): Hallo,
was ist nun laut aktuellem Stand des Taggings derzeit noch umstritten? Die Wege haben inzwischen access=private + foot=yes, also eh der Standard bei Waldtracks und Pfaden.
Oder gibts es vorort Verbotsschilder, die das BETRETEN der Wege verbieten?

Was als Weg in die OSM eingezeichnet wird, entscheided der Mapper. Dass können durchaus auch verwachsene und nur mehr schlecht sichtbare Pfade sein, dafür gibts den Tag "trail_visibility".
maxodermoritz (2020-09-28 16:20:51+00:00): Vorher war garnichts "Standard". Es war kein Unterschied zwischen öffentlichen Weg und privaten Weg erkennbar. Wie wärs wenn man vorher einen Blick in den Kataster wirft.
PPete2 (2020-09-28 16:57:54+00:00): Danke! Das interpretiere ich als, dass nun das aktuelle Tagging passt. (das die Wege nur für Fußgänger frei sind und sonstiger Verkehr privat ist)
BCNorwich (2020-09-26 08:34:56+00:00): Hi, Please see here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dcartpath to understand that a cartpath is a linear feature and should not be drawn as an area. Zoom in to the ones you've added and you will see the grass rendered in the center of each of your paths.

Also as I said before, please see here for a guide on golf course features tagging:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

If you need help pleas just ask.
Regards Bernard.
Jose Luis Infante (2020-09-26 23:28:24+00:00): Hola,
gracias por tu edición.
En la imagen no se puede apreciar ni la escalera ni la rampa, pero te comento como hacerlo.
Lo mejor sería dibujar dos vías, una para las escaleras y otra para la rampa.
Las escaleras tendría la etiqueta highway=steps. No haría falta la etiqueta wheelchair.
La rampa tendría la etiqueta highway=footway, con la etiqueta wheelchair=yes. Se podría añadir la etiqueta wheelchair:description para describir la vía (si tiene mucha inclinación, etc).
La etiqueta foot=yes no haría falta en ninguna de las dos vías.
Por cierto, la etiqueta access=no significa que no se puede acceder, tampoco para los peatones.
Un saludo!
eggie (2020-09-26 08:54:15+00:00): Beste troapel.. Het vlak landuse=grass heb ik weer van de Oosterkade teruggelegd waar het vandaan kwam.
Reguliere wegen kun je beter loshouden van de landuse.
Desnoods teken je een aparte strook gras tussen het farmland en de Oosterkade.

MVG,
Eggie
VA00 (2020-12-29 17:18:29+00:00): Kamieniołom !?!?!?!?! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/851758304
Władysław Komorek (2020-12-29 18:24:53+00:00): !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
VA00 (2020-12-29 19:37:21+00:00): Skąd pomysł, że tu jest kamieniołom?
Władysław Komorek (2020-12-29 19:42:28+00:00): Proszę o komentarze merytoryczne.
Wiesz, to zmień.
Nie wiesz, to zapytaj innych na forum.
VA00 (2020-12-29 19:49:24+00:00): Ze stale rosnącym zdumieniem obserwują Twoje edycje. 90% sytuacji w których moja wizja lokalna nie potwierdza istnienia obiektów to Twoje edycje. Co rozumiesz w takiej sytuacji jako merytoryczny komentarz? Może tak:
1) nie wprowadzaj obiektu na mapę na podstawie zdj. sat. jeżeli nie jesteś 100% pewny 
2) sprawdź przed edycja historię zmian obiektów, bo ktoś mógł to poprawić wg. stanu bardziej aktualnego niż orto
3) powstrzymaj się od edycji terenów które są de facto placem budowy, i zmieniają się z miesiąca na miesiąc.
Władysław Komorek (2020-12-29 20:02:05+00:00): 1,2. Obiekty nie były wprowadzane ze zdjęć lotniczych tylko przez kilka lat z IMPA, PRG, KJEG.
3. Mapujemy stan faktyczny a nie planowane, przypuszczalnie, place budowy. Chyba, że naniesione chwilowo przez lokalsów (źródło=local knowledge).
Jeśli położenie obiektu jest niewłaściwe to proszę to zgłosić do właściwego urzędu o korektę.
Władysław Komorek (2020-12-29 20:03:30+00:00): PS. Posse o przeslanie mi e-mailem te 90% błędnych edycji to jest sprawdzę.
VA00 (2020-12-29 20:24:32+00:00): To może zacznijmy od tego kamieniołomu? Do jakiego urzędu mam zgłosić, że go tam nie ma?
JochenOSM (2020-09-26 15:54:48+00:00): Hallo Lena,
danke für deine Änderung. Wolltest du eintragen dass auf diesem Stück in südlicher Richtung 50 erlaubt ist, in nördlicher aber nur 30? Dafür ist maxspeed:forward und maxspeed:backward zuständig. Mit oneway= hattest du das Straßenstück versehentlich komplett zur Einbahnstraße gemacht, das habe ich korrigiert. Viele Grüße, Jochen
naveenpf (2020-09-29 15:44:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91543677
gileri (2020-09-26 11:54:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Sur quoi êtes-vous basé pour ce changement de rue ? La position des numéros postaux sur la rue, ainsi que le cadastre, semblent indiquer qu'il s'agit bien de la "Rue André Gide".
Ger0nimo69 (2020-09-26 12:02:35+00:00): je me suis basé sur la photo à l'entrée de la résidence. je corrige le nom de la rue. le cadastre indique bien rue andré Gide