piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patr1k_P (2021-05-01 08:46:01+00:00): ahoj, uz som si viackrat vsimol, ze ked doplnas novu ulicu, tak davas skrateny nazov...v tomto pripade sa jedna o ul. Podjavorinskej, Krasku, Hurbana...Kde na ZBGIS je to uvedene takto? Lebo ked si pozries aj adresu, tak nazov je cely..

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa?bm=zbgis&z=18&c=17.749971,48.458308&sc=n&it=point&dt=-#/detail/adresne-body/0/17684448

a takto isto je to aj na MINVSK
segi (2021-05-02 08:01:36+00:00): ahoj, na začiatku som to zle chápal a myslel som si že všade majú ulice oficálne skrátený tvar (tak som zvyknutý u nás). Potom som opravoval niektoré ale asi ich dosť ostalo. Prejdem si nové kontroly a poopravujem to.
Patr1k_P (2021-05-02 08:26:43+00:00): jaj, v pohode...ja som potom pisal dodkovi, lebo som si nebol isty ci to ja robim dobre
segi (2021-05-02 08:32:34+00:00): Hej už mi písal :)
Ak náhodou natrafíš ešte na nezrovnalosť tak ju prosím oprav. Počkám kým vygeneruje nový súbor so zmenami a potom to prejdem.
Patr1k_P (2021-05-02 09:49:42+00:00): okej
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:45:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
olo81 (2021-04-14 17:08:59+00:00): opisowa nazwa do poprawy 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/873036543
PT-53 (2021-02-16 08:34:03+00:00): Hallo mathpras,
das
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907638345/history
ist die Zufahrt zu einem Wohnhaus (highway=service + service=driveway) und kein Feldweg (highway=track)
Grüße
PT-53 (2021-02-16 10:03:24+00:00): PS:
Dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219122816/history
+
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762627892/history
müßte - bis zur Hauszufahrt !! - noch von track auf service umgestellt werden.
mathpras (2021-02-18 04:13:55+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have not modified the existing tag as we don't have the supporting evidence to make the changes. thanks for your inputs. please find the changeset(99487866) for the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community
PT-53 (2021-02-18 08:02:21+00:00): Hallo mathpras, ,
Du hast jetzt hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762627892/history#map=18/47.97712/9.44018
den gesamten Weg auf service hochgestuft. Das ist falsch !!
Ich habe doch geschrieben, daß nur das Stück bis zur Hauszufahrt hochgestuft werden soll. Dazu muß dieser Weg an der Zufahrt aufgetrennt werden.
Ich bitte um Berichtigung.
mathpras (2021-02-18 08:58:33+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset(99507442) for the suggested modifications
PT-53 (2021-02-18 09:21:06+00:00): Hallo mathpras, , 
Du hast jetzt des gesamten Wegabschnitt zurück geändert. Das ist wiederum falsch !!
Warum trennst Du den Weg an der Hauszufahrt nicht auf ?
mathpras (2021-02-18 09:32:16+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset(99510137)  for the suggested modifications
PT-53 (2021-02-18 11:39:17+00:00): Jetzt paßts.
Warin61 (2021-02-27 01:18:57+00:00): The "Forestry Corporation of NSW" is the correct name for the  operator of State Forests in NSW. 
The "Forestry Corporation" is a shortened version of the full name and could be confused with other states operators.
Warin61 (2021-02-27 01:41:45+00:00): Glens Creek is incorrect near the end - southern, the named creek goes further to the east rather than to the west. 

Buccarumbi Creek - the source end ... there is no name on the base map for the end .. so that should not carry the name.

Both creeks are tagged 'intermittent' .. where did that information come from??? There is reasonable rainfall in this area .. I would expect them to have water most of the time. 

When you changed Old Glen Innes Road you should remove or alter the source tag as 'survey' no loner applies to 'asphalt'
Spoony (2023-05-07 08:08:36+00:00): Besteht die Grenzkontrolle noch oder kann der Tag "barrier=border_control" und die entsprechende Beschreibung weg?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
user_11435438 (2021-02-27 15:58:48+00:00): 广州APM不是地铁，没人会把它称为地铁，也不是在地下就叫地铁了。
参见wiki的标记方案，https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways#Types_of_railway_line ，其中写明
railway=monorail - A railway with only a single rail, often inner city and above street level. Also used for monorail-like automated people-mover systems like Miami's Metromover.
故APM应标记为monorail，即使它不是单轨，也不能标记为地铁，请勿滥用地铁。
andi9876 (2021-02-17 09:12:10+00:00): del
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Enock4seth (2021-02-16 08:07:07+00:00): Not River names :)
Manoj Thapa (2023-01-20 09:29:03+00:00): Please remove these untagged nodes.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 14:06:55+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this, and it all looks good to me.
andi9876 (2021-02-17 09:11:15+00:00): del
eggie (2021-02-16 10:23:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Teddy73 (2021-02-18 07:48:49+00:00): Hi Galbinus,
ich glaube du hast hier aus Versehen hgv statt psv aus dem Oneway ausgeschlossen. Kannst ja nochmal prüfen was wirklich stimmt. 
Danke und viele Grüße
Galbinus (2021-02-18 08:20:15+00:00): Ups - danke für den Hinweis. Habe es korrigiert.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
BCNorwich (2021-02-16 11:07:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I think this is a Public Footpath so there would be designated foot access rather than access=no. So I've removed the access=no tag.

You placed part of the path and part of a track on top of each other. So I've removed the duplicate section of the pathway.

Regards Bernard.
rach_hw (2021-02-16 14:05:23+00:00): Hi Bernard, thanks for the amendment, yes it is a public footpath. My first addition, so I haven't quite got the hang of it! I'll take a look at the settings you amended so I can get it right first time next time. :)

Thank you!

Rachel
BCNorwich (2021-02-16 11:12:04+00:00): Hi, I've sectioned off the foot accessible section tagging it access by foot and agricultural.
ToniE (2021-02-16 09:04:04+00:00): Hallo,

ich hatte gestern schon mal an eine(n) Kollegen/in (rms_MKRA) geschrieben.

Hier läuft leider noch was falsch.

- highway=bus_stop soll nur an Nodes getagged werden ...

Was hier und bei anderen Edits aber komplett falsch läuft:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4422433402

Dieser Node hat nun keine Informationen mehr, die sind woanders hin gewandert? Der Node war ausreichend attributiert, warum sind die Informationen auf einen Way übertragen worden? 

Dieser Node ist aber Teil von Bus-Routen-Relationen, die nun kaputt sind.

Die selben Probleme habe ich  nachträglich noch bei den Edits von rms_MKRA entdeckt - ptna.openstrettmap.de liefert das über Nacht

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-RoVG-Analysis.html#bus_3

"PTv2 Route: 'role' = 'platform' aber 'public_transport' ist nicht gesetzt: Node 4446442010 (iD, JOSM), Node 4446442011 (iD, JOSM)"

Das ist sub-optimal und bedeutet eine Menge Arbeit, das wieder zu reparieren.

Mein Vorschlag daher: die Nodes mit den Platforminformationen belassen und keine neuen Ways erstellen (auch weil highway=bus_stop an ways nicht definiert ist).

Bitte diese Informationen auch an die anderen MitstreiterInnen weiterleiten, bevor noch mehr kaputt gemacht wird.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
rms_LDIE (2021-02-16 10:18:52+00:00): Hi Toni,

vielen Dank für dein Feedback. Ich habe die Problematik an die Projektleitung weitergegeben und um sofortige Behebung, bzw. Anweisung gebeten, wie wir damit zukünftig verfahren. Bitte entschuldige die Unannehmlichkeit. In meinem Profil findest Du einen Link zur OSM-Wiki Seite des Projekts, dort kannst Du im Zweifel die Problematik direkt an die Projektverantwortlichen leiten. Die Schulung der Mapper hat die MENTZ GmbH durchgeführt, die auf der Wiki-Seite verlinkt sind.

Lieben Gruß
Leon
ToniE (2021-02-16 12:27:28+00:00): Danke Leon,

evtl. könnte Mentz bzw. Oliver Pollesch am nächsten OSM-Stammtisch (München) am 11.03. teilnehmen, damit wir ein Feintuning vornehmen können.

Worauf wir als OSM natürlich auch achten wollen, ist: Mapping durch RMS/Mentz für BEG in Bayern sollte die selben Tags, das selbe Vorgehen haben wie z.B. in Baden-Württemberg (BEG-Äquivalent dort: Dietmar Seifert von NVBW) oder Hamburg oder Berlin ...

Liebe Grüße,
Toni
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
eggie (2021-02-16 10:25:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:45:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-16 14:05:55+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change.
What you need to do here is add a point on the road where you want to split it, then right click on the point and select split (the scissors icon). Then you can change the properties of each section separately.
BCNorwich (2021-02-16 11:19:11+00:00): I've remove access=no from footpaths.
L'imaginaire (2021-02-16 10:59:22+00:00): Dag Wouter,

Bedankt voor de aanvulling! Fijn om te lezen dat OSM gebruikt zal worden voor het nieuwe stratenplan.

Twee kleine tips / details:
1) Als er access=private staat, dan geldt dit direct als default, dus dan is het niet nodig om het voor de verschillende 'modi' apart te vermelden.
2) De source tag kan je gebruiken op individuele features, maar dan is het soms wat moeilijk om te weten waarvoor de bron gebruikt is (in dit geval zou dat ofwel de toegangsbepaling kunnen zijn, ofwel de geometrie van de weg, ofwel de tagging als track). Meestal is het beter om in de changeset aan te geven wat er precies is gewijzigd en met welke bron.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:45:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
BCNorwich (2021-02-16 11:25:17+00:00): Hi, I've removed the section of path placed on top of the bridge because it causes duplication of the footway.
BCNorwich (2021-02-16 11:26:22+00:00): Hi I removed the path section that the bridge highway replaces.
kayle (2021-07-01 07:17:12+00:00): Zdravím.
Jedna otázka, dané parkovisko https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907661601 je prístupné pre každého? Bolo označené ako len ako bod a malo access=private (súkromný prístup), ale to už bolo pred veeeľa rokmi.
A ešte jedna poznámka. Prosím, ak je niekde POI ako bod (node) preneste info na cestu (way). Ak je POI na ceste (way) tak nevytvárajte nový bod (node). Vznikajú takto duplicitné POI. Ďakujem.
s8evq (2021-02-17 19:07:15+00:00): Dag Samblok,

Bedankt voor je edits in OSM. Een kleine opmerking: je hebt op deze weg highway=construction aangepast naar highway=path. Super! Maar dan mag je ook de tag 'construction=path' verwijderen. Die twee gaan namelijk steeds samen: highway=construction+construction=path wordt dan bij afwerking highway=path.
Ik heb dit nu alvast al bewerkt.
samblok (2021-02-18 07:54:24+00:00): Beste s8evq,

De brug gaat wel pas volgende maand open vandaar dat ik dacht dat deze tag moest blijven staan.
Hoe moet dit correct aangepast worden?
s8evq (2021-02-18 08:19:39+00:00): Geen probleem, dan zetten we het best nog even terug. Dus "highway=construction" + "construction=path" zolang er nog werken zijn, of de weg nog niet geopend zijn. Ik heb de aanpassing alvast gedaan.
s8evq (2021-02-18 08:23:50+00:00): PS: wat er soms bij gezet wordt is 'opening_date' (zie wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date). Hiermee kun je de vermoedelijke openingsdatum invoeren. Er zijn dan tools die controleren als een weg nog op construction staat, maar de opening_date is reeds gepasseerd (ik dacht  StreetComplete app, en de Osmose website).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:41:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:41:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-16 10:36:20+00:00): Are you sure this one is a service road (for cars)?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907669940
Irma IRM-ED (2023-01-03 03:20:04+00:00): Hi marek kleciak, Thank you for your contribution to OSM. I need help as I am not sure about this area https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/907671333. I found a water body crossing problem in this area with highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/907671333. I have checked various satellite images.  The bridge is not in the satellite image? Since part of the road is flooded, is the road passable?
Please let me know if you have any information or suggestions. This is very helpful to me as a remote mapper.

Thank you
(https://maproulette.org/challenge/30209/task/143779438)
marek kleciak (2023-01-03 09:42:34+00:00): Take a look at the optimized situation. There was no river anymore and the old sand field is already used for agriculture. I deeply suggest you to learn JOSM. Best regards and thank you for your contribution!
Irma IRM-ED (2023-01-03 22:54:12+00:00): Thanks  marek kleciak , Happy Mapping!
marek kleciak (2023-01-05 07:22:37+00:00): The same to you! Happy mapping! Marek
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
L'imaginaire (2021-02-16 10:06:12+00:00): Bedankt!
eggie (2021-02-16 10:33:00+00:00): Dag vvad  Je vraagt om feedback.

Het is niet gebruikelijk om alle opritten toe te voegen, maar formeel is het oke. 
De Settershof heb ik omgetagd naar highway=residential  (straten in woongebied en niet doorgaand) 
MVG
eggie
vvad (2021-02-18 15:30:32+00:00): voor een goede bereikbaarheid voor hulpverleningsvoertuigen is het fijn om alle opritten erin te hebben. Dan weet je duidelijker waar je moet zijn..
eggie (2021-02-18 15:32:47+00:00): Oke... up to you 😀
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Futur3r (2021-02-16 16:18:31+00:00): Hi,
For addresses in France and especially around Annecy.
You need at least to have the address on a node with addr:street. But it would be better to have the road and number in an associatedStreet relation.

Ultimatly if your object does not have at least addr:street the address is not usable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99368283
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SekeRob (2021-02-16 11:39:50+00:00): Street lighting up from Frankfurt am main al the way to Bhutan.Kindly split up your change sets, set your StreetComplete to autoupload and you dont have to worry about this annoying OSM changeset display problem.
TIA
mustermannxx (2021-02-16 12:53:27+00:00): Hi, StreetComplete is set to AutoUpload. Strange enough, that it loads it as one Set.
I will give it a bit more time, the next time I switch regions rapidly.
Best regards
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-16 12:06:29+00:00): Reviewed. All is good.
geow (2021-03-25 21:36:46+00:00): Hello Content Complaint (komoot),
(1) may I ask whether the "written proof from the landowner" was documented in a verifiable manner, e.g. in the OSM-wiki?
(2) In Bavaria, pedestrians and cyclists are allowed to freely use agricultural tracks outside of enclosed private property. Therefore, in this case, motor_vehicle=private would probably be the appropriate restriction.
Cheers 
geow
scintlark (2021-02-21 08:42:52+00:00): Hello Arwh and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I noticed that some of your changes span the entire globe - it helps to make them more localised so that people can look them up in the 'History' tab. In this case, I could see these changes in history for small towns in the United Kingdom which I assume was not your intention. :)

Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - “a” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. You can find guidance on good changeset comments in the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please let me know if you need further help with any of that.

Cheers!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
DD1GJ (2021-02-16 10:45:08+00:00): Löschung zurückgesetzt, nördlicher Weg war bereits als privat gekennzeichnet.

Es ist üblich, Zufahrten als privat gekennzeichnet einzutragen. OSM wird auch für Planungen bei Zustell- und Rettungsdiensten benutzt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:44:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-02-16 11:51:01+00:00): Hey Koen,

Het veld 'Operator' wordt gebruikt om aan te duiden welk bedrijf een winkel uitbaat; het is niet nodig (en zelfs incorrect) om daar 'BAKKER' in te vullen. We weten immers al dat dit een bakker is adhv 'shop=bakery'

Als je vragen hebt, kan je die stellen op https://app.element.io/?pk_vid=e5edf244a662c19c1608921542fbf771#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org
rab (2021-02-19 20:05:54+00:00): Hello,
something went wrong here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3444299589
ALu68 (2021-02-16 14:21:00+00:00): Hallo Bauer Herrmann,

Warum änderst du den Straßennamen von "Alte Bergstraße" in "Neutral Berg runterheitzen" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138241776/history

Deine privaten Anmerkungen sind keine sinnvollen Beiträge.
ALu68 (2021-02-16 14:37:24+00:00): Spassmapping entfernt/korrigiert
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99389372