piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 06:12:43+00:00): Hi Jennnnnnny,

Welcome to OSM! Please be aware that this is a public map and that you should only add verifiable features. Flagstaff Gardens is already mapped as a park here, personal opinions or individual experiences such as "Beautiful sunlight place" are not something we typically add to the map.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
pluton_od (2022-10-21 05:37:53+00:00): Не добавил `use_sidepath` полностью до Артиллерийской улицы, т.к. там перед ней нет соединения велодорожки и дороги и непонятно, если это помешает программам построения маршрутов для велосипедов.
tastrax (2022-11-24 04:53:57+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
つｓe (2022-10-27 23:44:39+00:00): これはどう見たって公園ではないですよね。嘘を書くのはやめてください。
nyampire (2022-10-28 07:33:34+00:00): つseさん、対応ありがとうございます。

追加で、公園を含む編集である
128158567
128157685
128157635

を巻き戻しておきました。
nyampire (2022-10-30 11:54:50+00:00): chocoyubiさんによる編集の大部分を巻き戻しました。
syntex (2023-01-21 15:41:27+00:00): To jest budynek, błędna zmiana.
OpenStreetMap-WP (2023-01-21 19:01:29+00:00): A na co to zmieniłem ?
syntex (2023-01-21 20:34:19+00:00): Skasowałeś znacznik building
NorthCrab (2023-01-22 07:26:15+00:00): Wygląda na jakieś dziwne zachowanie edytora przy użyciu tej templatki.
Johnny Carlsen (2023-06-07 04:43:02+00:00): Are any of these parks real?
Johnny Carlsen (2023-06-05 05:32:07+00:00): I see you've added a lot of parks in areas that look very residential.

What is your source for these parks?
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-21 07:13:06+00:00): Change reverted. Please do not re-classify roads without local knowledge.
ToniE (2022-10-21 07:57:47+00:00): Servus Rudi,

willkommen bei OSM.

> Bezeichnung geändert, damit der Zustand in der Karte sichtbar wird

genau das machen wir bei OSM nicht: '(außer Betrieb)' gehört nicht in den Namen. Das verstößt gehen eine Grundprinzip bei OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name


Für kurzfristige Schließungen gibt es opening_hours=closed bzw. opening_hours=off

Du hattest ja schon disused:aerialway gesetzt, wohl aber vergessen aeriaway=chair_lift zu löschen?

Viele Grüße
Toni
Frans S (2022-11-17 11:17:07+00:00): Hello. thanks for mapping here
Project UN project 13456- 57
Please map roads in accordance with this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
Do not overextract. Especially in roads / rivers networks there may be many paths / streams in the imagery. You are not requested to map them all, and most of the times you can trace only the main ones as explained in the instruction.
Main roads are to be tagged as highway=unclassified in general

 As a general rule, keep in mind to map at 17-18-19 zoom scale levels for topographic data; 
 
 
 Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
 A request.  Please leave a gap in a hedge where a road/path crosses the hedge. In real live there is no hedge crossing (blocking) a road.
 
 
 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2022-10-21 12:52:09+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped accurate (I reviewed 6 changesets)

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127867796
rhtb0 (2022-10-21 08:59:44+00:00): '펜타곤'은 지하철역이 아님
마들역에 딸린 부속 시설임
rhtb0 (2022-10-21 09:00:49+00:00): 이렇게 잘못 표기하면 openrailwaymap.org같이 오픈스트리트맵 데이터를 활용하는 사이트에 실제 지하철 역으로 그대로 표기됩니다.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-09 14:54:15+00:00): Hi, your changeset broke a couple of admin relations. Can you please fix them?
gscholz (2022-11-01 07:38:49+00:00): Hi Kanhaia,
your recent activities in this region have left behind countless errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=80.25084&lat=26.07120&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

This kind of errors irritate routing software and also look ugly on the maps. Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-05 07:44:26+00:00): Hi Kanhaia, 
this errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
❤️‍🔥 (2022-10-26 02:31:30+00:00): Hi, addresses should only go on the main building, they shouldn't be duplicated on sheds or garages
CoderThomas (2022-10-26 02:39:57+00:00): In this edit, I only changed anything with an addr:.* tag. I didn't add any addresses. Feel free to remove the duplicates if you want to.
CoderThomas (2022-10-26 02:42:11+00:00): It is true that on a different edit when mapping buildings I did add those duplicate addresses. I might look into removing them with JOSM.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-10-26 05:36:35+00:00): cool, no problem - the address import tool noticed this so I've deleted the duplicates
ToniE (2022-10-21 08:00:55+00:00): Servus,

willkommen bei OSM.

der Hundesalon hat nun wirklich nichts mit der U 4 zu tun, ist kein Bestandteil der Linie.

Habe ihn deshalb wieder aus der Relation entfernt.

Viele Grüße
Toni
chromeboy82 (2022-10-21 08:13:04+00:00): Ok, danke
ToniE (2022-10-21 08:16:22+00:00): "nah bei der U 4" ist eher eine Eigenschaft des Hundesalons als der U 4.

VG
Toni
ElliottPlack (2022-11-11 20:55:12+00:00): Hi Aleksey, I came across this edit because I-95, the busiest highway in the United States, does not carry any name between DC and Baltimore. It is simply "I-95" which is reflected in the route ref. Am I to assume this edit is related to Mapbox Mapping teams' support of road navigation? By local custom and OSM standard, names should not be applied to things that are not named. Nearby motorways may have names, e.g. The "Baltimore Washington Parkway" but I-95 most certainly does not. Please roll back this change. This has been discussed previously in OSM US slack (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1629488217256300). See also, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

I look forward to your response.

Elliott Plack  
Data Working Group
DUGA (2022-11-12 00:49:43+00:00): Who the h* is the local user here…? And just because they requested through Mapbox, you are going to accept without validation? Who are you?
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-13 10:43:06+00:00): Good afternoon Elliott! Thank you for the detailed explanation about the road names, it is very useful information. The road name plays a major role in Mapbox navigation, as well as the road number. There has been a slight misunderstanding in this situation. The incorrect edit has been rolled back. Thank you for your friendliness. 

Regards Aleksey.
ElliottPlack (2022-11-14 14:00:42+00:00): Thank you, Aleksey! Have a great day.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-21 10:54:21+00:00): Change reverted. Street name was correct.
Anton Valodzin (2023-05-15 12:56:32+00:00): Hi, thanks for the clarification!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127868713
mueschel (2022-11-15 14:21:48+00:00): Hi,
is this bridge built up again? It has highway and ruins:highway tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117698030
nikospag (2022-11-15 16:02:43+00:00): i don't know that.
ChristopherGS (2022-10-22 17:12:46+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for making these changes around the Lansing area. I've reviewed this changeset as you requested and it looks good. 

I see you are changing operator tags from CATA to Capital Area Transit Authority; something that I've noticed around here is in Lansing the tags are CATA and in East Lansing they are fully spelled out. It might be worth standardizing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127869031
Jakka (2022-10-23 16:37:52+00:00): Le sentier ne raccorde pas un highway au nord "Rue du Vicinal" ou par le parking ?
SekeRob (2022-10-21 09:37:43+00:00): hi,

I "Anello delle Bregonze n.11": Fixme="Effettuare revert"

Assolutemente. Il mappatore che lo ha inserito non ha risposto a più messaggi.. Doppio 'highway'.  Se reali, i tag dovrebbero essere spostati nei modi preesistenti come relazione di percorso (nuove route relation).

ciao
Andrea Martini (2022-10-21 12:48:13+00:00): I ga fatto un macello, zio bekkkkkk
mavl (2022-10-21 15:23:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. У этой дороги был статус highway=living_street, а не highway=residential.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345649229/history
HellMap (2022-10-22 21:36:21+00:00): Hi!

You changed the North end of this temporary road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099914482 to be more South than before.

This does break routing now since only `highway=construction` way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099914484 is between the usable road segments.

Also has it really been moved so much? Considering the bridge ramp ends basically where the track used to connect to the road, it seems unlikely. Here's my Mapillary from a few weeks ago  https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2680085605457244&focus=photo
UrSuS (2022-10-23 07:13:14+00:00): Hi! Sorry, my mistake! Fixed now, thanks for Mapillary images! I thought I'm the only one collecting those in rural areas :)
joost schouppe (2023-05-02 12:27:11+00:00): Hoi Kurt,
Je hebt hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164079249 een fietsstraat op 70 km/u gezet. Dat kan niet, en het lijkt wel realistisch dat dit effectief een fietsstraat is, dus ik heb dat teruggedraaid.
SekeRob (2022-10-21 10:14:07+00:00): Hi,

You touched many things in a very large area in a single edit session which is ill advised. For that see wiki on change set '(recommended) best practise' to keep it compact: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Your changes include 16 warnings per the edit summary above. It would be good if you resolve these too like the other 12 issues you fixed.

Happy mapping.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 15:14:36+00:00): Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero "8C - 7" è errato. Ciao, Andrea PS Ma il ref è corretto?
Frans S (2022-11-15 14:14:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please map roads in accordance with this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

Through going roads are never to be tagged as track.

Best regards
Baloo Uriza (2022-10-22 14:08:40+00:00): Proprietary sources are generally prohibited due to licensing; please provide specifics.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127870676
pmarkina_lyft (2022-10-25 06:29:33+00:00): Hi, Baloo Uriza!
My name is Polina, and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you so much for paying attention to this. 
I want to assure you that the Lyft mapping team takes the OpenStreetMap rules seriously and that all of our resources are compliant with them. To make edits, the Lyft OSM team uses proprietary features created and owned by Lyft, specifically the street-level imagery from Lyft’s drivers taken during rides in various markets and Lyft drivers' GPS tracks. Also, as "proprietary aerial imagery" for now, we use Nearmap imagery. They do allow us to use their imagery for OSM edits by license. That means our evidence fully complies with the OSM requirements. This data is updated frequently, and we try to make edits based on the most recent data.
This information is in the description of my profile in the "Proprietary sources" section.

Best regards, Polina
Jakka (2022-10-23 16:35:33+00:00): Ce escaliers ne raccorde pas deux highway ...morceau path vers bicycle road ?
ququruzka (2022-10-21 09:30:20+00:00): Hi !
what it is a reason to change smth in Ukrainian territory ? 

For now we have forbidden rule 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
eggie (2022-10-21 09:16:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
TweedehandsKoffie (2022-10-21 09:30:17+00:00): Dank je,
Goede dag gewenst.
map per (2022-10-25 06:28:18+00:00): Hallo rms_ALG,

die Wartebereiche der Bushaltestellen waren sind hier schon lange eingezeichnet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369932213). Bitte nicht doppelt einzeichnen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10118309422).

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2022-11-05 11:35:39+00:00): Wurde in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128068132 korrigiert
DaveF (2022-10-21 12:14:27+00:00): Hi
Could you please use prow_ref tag instead of name.
Also add designation=public_footpath

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:designation%3Dpublic_footpath
DaveF (2022-10-21 12:16:40+00:00): "desire line" is not a valid path name.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105730370#map=19/51.77818/-2.26180
eggie (2022-10-21 09:21:46+00:00): Hi  Deadly..  
Thanks for your contrubution
Please don't connect roads to the landuse.
Greetz,
eggie
charl3s (2022-10-21 12:06:35+00:00): Zmieniono istniejący adres na disused:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10118374719  
Czyżby edycje odbywały się w sposób "jak mi się podoba"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10118374719
Adres jest w danych PRG wraz z budynkiem. Po drugie widać budynek na sentinelu.
Po trzecie: pozwolenie na budowę: https://wyszukiwarka.gunb.gov.pl/wniosek/4a415e46-c827-4ba0-a0bf-d8c4294f0d22/
maraf24 (2022-10-21 12:38:40+00:00): Zmieniono na disused, bo był tutaj tylko adres.
Wszystko co wyżej piszesz, to są dane spoza osm, których w OSM nie było.
Pozwolenie na budowę nie ma tu znaczenia. Nic z niego dla osm nie wynika.
Jakie źródła ja użyłem - podałem. Wg tych źródeł oraz danych osm adres nie był w użyciu i tak został oznaczony.
maraf24 (2022-10-29 23:09:02+00:00): Z postu na Discordzie wychodzi, że w pierwszym podanym linku zrobiłeś błąd, chodziło o adres z https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10118710050
W tej sytuacji oczywiście mój komentarz w ogóle nie mógł dotyczyć tego punktu. Dlatego teraz uzupełnię:
Pochodzi on z zestawu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127880874
Zamieszczona tam lista źródeł nie wskazywała, by upewniono się, że adres powinien pozostać w OSM - a dokładniej, że wykonano weryfikację danych z importu.
Nie wspomniano tam o Sentinelu ani o PnB.
Wspomniano ewidencję budynków, którą ja również sprawdzam, ale:
1. wówczas ta ewidencja u mnie działała z przerwami (co odkrylem kilka godzin później) i ja tego obrysu nie widziałem. 
2. sama obecność budynku w tej ewidencji to trochę za mało, gdyż zdarzają się w niej też budynki wyburzone/prognozowane.
Wolę taki adres ustawić jako diusused: niż go skasować - zostaje zachowana historia, a jeśli pojawią się nowe dane (Sentinel), to łatwo go przywrócić do życia.
Aim311_ (2022-11-01 15:12:55+00:00): Cześć. Na podstawie jakich informacji nastąpiła korekta daty otwarcia?
Tomek | Yanosik (2022-11-02 08:57:12+00:00): Cześć, data została podana orientacyjnie, gdyż nie mogłem znaleźć informacji, kiedy może nastąpić otwarcie. Zwróciłbym jeszcze uwagę na usunięcie tagu motor_vehicle=no, czy droga jest przejezdna dla samochodów?
Aim311_ (2022-11-04 08:58:56+00:00): Droga pomimo blokady na wjazdach w okolicy rond była przejezdna przez cały okres modernizacji. Chciałem ją otworzyć tydzień przed Wszystkimi Świętymi, ale zmiana daty otwarcia trochę mnie zakłopotała.
Tomek | Yanosik (2022-11-04 11:49:56+00:00): Ok, postaram się dopisywać w przyszłości informację do notatek, że data jest podana orientacyjnie.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-21 09:34:05+00:00): Changed road type to "Residential" and added road name "Haver Drive" according to local user's request and Esri World Imagery #mbx_uk_editing
mcliquid (2022-10-27 09:10:41+00:00): Hi, warum hast du hier addr:country gelöscht?
haukep (2022-10-21 11:49:07+00:00): Danke für die Änderung. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12687157 und der von die durch das Einfügen der Brücke neu erstellten https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105741124 sowie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105741125 haben noch "note=Wegführung geschätzt (alter Verlauf vor Umbau)". Die Note ist scheinbar mehr als 7 Jahre alt. Daher offene Frage: Kann die Note weg?
Brummelwuff (2022-10-21 14:37:50+00:00): Hi, ich wolllte an dem Weg eh noch weitere Änderungen vornehmen, momentan fehlt noch die Höchstgeschwindigkeit und welche Schilder vor den Schranken aufgestellt sind. Dabei werde ich dann auch die Note löschen.
habi (2022-10-21 09:48:28+00:00): Sorry, fixes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3351923 not 3407141...
kogutowicz-mano (2022-10-27 10:48:37+00:00): Szia!
Nem túl valószínű, hogy a önkormányzati közgyűlés ezt a nevet szavazta volna meg a közterületnek: "Mátyás király utca mellékút".
balazsdeak (2022-10-28 07:16:23+00:00): Jogos. Kérlek, segíts, hogyan oldható meg OSM eszközökkel az utca páros és páratlan végének Y alakú szétválása? Ráadásul a kérdéses páros csáp végét az érintett 1218 helyrajzi számú privát telek (rajta a 48-as házszám) elnyeli, magába foglalja, forrás: ekozmu.e-epites.hu, "Földrészletek" és "Nemzeti Térinformatikai Alaptérkép" (NTA) rétegek. Köszönöm
kogutowicz-mano (2022-10-28 07:33:35+00:00): Azannya! Ilyen létezik? :-o
A játszótértől nyugatra a két ág sorszerűen van számozva?
Buggyant ez az önkormányzat! :-)

Bár ez a nevét nem befolyásolja. Nem szokatlan, hogy egy utcára hasonlító közterület nem lineáris, hanem burjánzik.
Például https://data2.openstreetmap.hu/0id.php?osmid=w194193451,w194193453,w194193450,w194193452&nev=Bajcsy-Zsilinszky%20lak%C3%B3telep

Szerintem így jó, ahogy most van.
Mit gondolsz?
balazsdeak (2022-10-28 08:09:39+00:00): Rendben.
NieWnen (2022-10-23 11:47:35+00:00): Parę błędnych zmian.

Usunięcie fragmentu rzeki Dlaczego?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525238937

Kołobrzeski rower miejski w Żyrardowie? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5943453987

layer=-2?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040045306

Oprócz tego nakładające się linie chodnika.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549624892

Wszystkie powyższe poprawiłem. Możliwe, że coś przeoczyłem.

Proszę nie klikaj tego co iD podpowiada "od tak" bo często źle podpowiada niestety. Trzeba to weryfikować, najlepiej z wiki, a w razie wątpliwości zachęcam do kontaktu z innymi mapującymi.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 15:15:06+00:00): Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero "1 - 1A" è errato. Ciao, Andrea PS Ma il ref è corretto?
LuxuryCoop (2022-10-21 22:26:01+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
yorados (2022-10-21 20:08:14+00:00): Hi HS-Rook,

kannst du das Tagging bitte nochmal anschauen?
Hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker
gibt es ein Beispiel wie Amazon-locker getaggt werden sollen.
Viele Grüße
HS-Rook (2022-10-22 07:26:45+00:00): Keine Ahnung ;)
Ich hab zum tagen den im Browser eingebetteten Editor verwendet. Dort sind Felder die man nutzen kann um etwas einzutragen oder auszuwählen. 

Das was ich mit Sicherheit wusste habe ich dann eingestellt.
Gino-52 (2022-12-22 10:19:46+00:00): Hallo duedelsheim,
Du hast hier tracks und path in footway geändert.
highway=footway sind nur Wege, die durch ein entsprechendes Schild gekennzeichnet sind.
Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway

Ausserdem ist "Aktualisierungen" als  Changesetkommentar ziemlich dünn. Da brauchst du auch gar nichts angeben.
Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
abakus_uploader (2022-10-21 22:32:10+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-21 11:37:16+00:00): Pakeitimas atšauktas. Glitiškių ąžuolas jau buvo pažymėtas.
Tau9 (2022-10-21 16:02:46+00:00): Ačiū. Programėlėje kažkodėl nerodė objekto.
SekeRob (2022-10-22 08:35:10+00:00): Hi,

When changing way lays it's really advisable to go by the 'newest' imagery. Clarity is prehistoric to say the least and offset badly is is warned for in other editors. Previous position of Via Fontana restored.