piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DmytroTagR (2021-06-04 11:41:55+00:00): Це схоже на власні нотатки користувача. "Герус", "Грибчук", інші прізвища, "19", "21А" не дуже схоже на назви магазинів. Деякі дійсно стосуються комерційної нерухомості: "Торба", наприклад, вже позначена правильно на будівлі, а не джерелом посеред проїзду; хіба "Продукти" в Шпанові дійсно можна позначити. 
По overpass-запиту natural=hot_spring в області знаходиться ще багато таких джерел, але перевіряти, що там насправді, задалеко.
kotok (2021-06-04 13:17:44+00:00): Ок, це мабуть якийсь торговий агент. Грибчук, Герус  це більш за все власники магазинів)). 3 місяці від нього немає активності, тому писати з роз’ясненнями цьому користувачу не буду.
jimmyhendrix (2021-05-26 18:45:07+00:00): Hallo H-ST,
Sie haben das Unternehmen an den bestehenden Punkt der Adresse angefügt. Eleganter ist es für ein Unternehmen einen eigenen Punkt (node) zu erstellen. Das habe ich nun gemacht und in Kürze sollte es auch in der Karte dargestellt werden.
Viele Grüße
jimmy
Lee Carré (2021-12-06 16:58:26+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2670289
Robot8A (2021-05-26 20:52:10+00:00): Mistake in changeset comment, the correct one should be: "Added fast food, moved florist"
pitfire (2021-05-29 12:46:07+00:00): Hallo os-emmer,
Für Poller gilt automatisch die Annahme, dass ausschließlich Fahrradfahrer und Fußgänger passieren können. Bezüglich der Berechtigungen entspricht das: access=no + foot=yes + bicycle=yes werden impliziert. Nur bei Abweichung der Rechte von der Vorgabe, müssen Berechtigungen neu gesetzt werden.
Es wird ein Poller gezeichnet auch wenn es mehrere gibt. 
Die Poller sollten noch den Eintrag "bollard=removable" und Das Material aus dem ein Poller besteht wird über material=* beschrieben. 
Im Falle von einer ganze Reihe von Pollern, können diese einfach in Form einer Linie Linienzug eingezeichnet werden. Hinweis: Eine Pollerlinie hat keinen Einfluß auf die Passierbarkeit von Wegen/Straßen.
Der "Weg: Grantham-Allee (537983749)" endet Richtung Westen vor der Pollerreihe
os-emmer (2021-05-30 12:40:50+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
danke für deine Hinweise. Ich habe das im Wiki gegengeprüft und kann bestätigen, dass du recht hast. Jetzt sollte alles ordentlich eingetragen sein.
Mashin (2021-05-26 21:14:09+00:00): Hi and thank for contributing. Just a few things.

1) Is the official name of those roads 380 Hitchcock Road?
2) service=parking_isle is indeed a correct tag. service=parking_lot_road is not used.
3) Is there any reason to change residential roads to service roads?
Dead Cow (2021-05-26 23:53:50+00:00): 1.) Yes, the official name is 380 Hitchcock Rd. 
2.) This is not a parking isle as you can see. It's an entire community serviced by a road. Maybe there's a better service? Or none?
3.) Because it's a road, but it's not an official town road. Seemed more fitting.
Dead Cow (2021-05-26 23:55:48+00:00): 3.1) When I say "not an official town road", Hitchcock Rd is an official town road, but 380 is this entire complex which is address 380 on Hitchcock road. Each unit is a townhouse unit number on 380 Hitchcock Rd.
Mashin (2021-05-27 00:59:04+00:00): Thanks for the reply!
If it is as you say a closed complex then I guess you are right and more appropriate would be highway=service (without undefined service=parking_lot_road tag). 

So if I understood correctly these service roads don't have official name (as on a road sign), but every building in the complex has address 380 Hitchcock Rd?
Then the correct way is to create a node at the place where the building is and fill out the address there e.g.:
addr:housenumber=380
addr:street=Hitchcock Road
addr:unit=3D

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
H-ST (2021-06-24 09:22:04+00:00): Hallo jimmyhendrix
Du hattest vor ein paar Wochen freundlicherweise meinen Eintrag optimiert. Danke dafür. Da ich an der Adresse nach wie vor nur einen Punkt sehe und nicht den Namen, dachte ich mir, dass Du bestimmt eine Lösung für die Anzeige des Namens hast. Ich habe mich an verschiedenen Stellen eingelesen, finde aber nichts, was mich zweifelsfrei einer Lösung näherbringt. Vielen Dank im Voraus, Gruß Hartmut
jimmyhendrix (2021-06-24 16:21:27+00:00): Hallo Hartmut,
die Beschriftung der Geschäfte und Unternehmen erfolgt nach bestimmten Regeln, was die "Rangfolge" der Darstellung betrifft. Je Örtlichkeit kann es sein, dass manche Namen in der Karte nicht dargestellt werden, da der Platz nicht vorhanden ist, um sie darzustellen bzw. andere (von der "Wichtigkeit" her) die Beschriftung verhindern. Ich habe den Punkt mal an die Rückseite des Gebäudes verschoben. Vielleicht entsteht dadurch der Platz, um auch den Namen darzustellen.
Viele Grüße
jimmy
VictorIE (2021-05-29 20:29:25+00:00): Hi,

This https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947454535 is a duplicate way. It is complicated by the three relations.
PT-53 (2021-05-27 05:55:46+00:00): Hallo id=2507,
an diesem Tunnel
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947455792/history
fehlt noch das Merkmal
layer=-1

Wiki:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947455792/history

Grüße
PT-53 (2021-05-27 06:01:20+00:00): PS:
Statt
tunnel=yes
sollte hier
tunnel=culvert
verwendet werden.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert
Grüße
eggie (2021-05-26 19:51:38+00:00): Maar die duiker stopt toch bij de oever en begint weer aan de waterkant een eindje verder? 
In de BGT zijn de ingangen van de duikers ingetekend. 
BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 
eggie
Dawid2849 (2021-05-26 19:42:57+00:00): Ups. Poprawna nazwa: Poprawienie chodnika na Zamojskiej.
PT-53 (2021-05-27 06:02:56+00:00): Hallo id=2507,
auch an diesem Tunnel
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947458559/history
fehlt das Merkmal
layer=-1

Statt
tunnel=yes
wäre
hier wohl
tunnel=flooded
angebracht.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dflooded

Grüße
Max-Kritic (2021-06-22 15:04:48+00:00): https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.22008&lat=50.96813&zoom=12&opacity=0.89
rskedgell (2021-05-26 20:03:16+00:00): Thanks. I forgot to do that one.
Ser9ei (2021-05-27 08:04:02+00:00): barrier=lift_gate сам по себе ничего не даёт. Надо также указать доступ. Тут будет access=private. Подробнее тут: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105378282
iWowik (2021-05-30 10:29:00+00:00): access=private закрывает доступ и пешеходам, а не только автомобилям.
Надо motor_vehicle=no
Ser9ei (2021-05-30 11:34:48+00:00): Тогда уж motor_vehicle=private. Но надо смотреть. Обычно в огороженных ЖК доступ private для всех.
iWowik (2021-05-30 12:35:56+00:00): Это как сказать....
Плакатов нет, "Стой, проход закрыт, стрелять будем"
Значит ходить можно.
Dodko (2021-06-20 18:54:40+00:00): Dohodlo sa, že slovo ulica sa nebude dávať do názvu ulice.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/NEJlJhUbhWA/m/QZgF71ZpBwAJ
NKA (2021-07-02 06:23:57+00:00): Er du sikker på at hele Munchs gate er stengt for biltrafikk syd for kryss Keysers gate? Tidligere sto bommen ved torvet/Teatergata 9.

Det medfører at biler ikke kan bruke inn/utkjøringen til Sentrum p-hus fra nord.
Bjoeni (2021-05-26 20:51:14+00:00): I meant: SP8dir to Bema is the *western* road now, the eastern road is blocked
Patr1k_P (2022-10-08 08:14:48+00:00): ahoj, skus prekontrolovat tu D4 ked sa ti da, v tejto sade odstranil cesty ktore boli v rekonstrukcii

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127098283
mapko (2022-10-08 09:58:23+00:00): ahoj. vystavba bola ukoncena. to co je highway=construction ma byt  proposed. posledne co som tam kazdu cestu upravil bolo spravne.
Patr1k_P (2022-10-08 10:08:14+00:00): on tie cesty vsak vsetky odstranil, tie vo vystavbe...ja som ich vsetky vratil spat..napr.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326107368
mapko (2022-10-08 10:11:25+00:00): bolo by spravne, aby sa ozval 4KK, lebo hrozi ze bude viac skodit ako zlepsovat. odpisal som mu do zmien kde to pokazil. ozval sa a pokazil to este viac https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124812557#map=16/48.2285/17.1928
Henosb (2021-05-26 21:28:05+00:00):  Maxar Premium Imagery (-0.60; 4.78); Strava
Dodko (2021-09-25 08:17:15+00:00): Adresy sa značia takto
addr:conscriptionnumber=súpisné
addr:housenumber=súpisné/orientačné
addr:streetnumber=orientačné

Opravil som adresy ktoré boli chybné napríklad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61630626/history
a ostatným doplnil ulicu a orientačné čísla.
fabiotofy (2021-05-27 11:43:18+00:00): ciao, ma quando vi è inserito il doppio toponimo (italiano e sloveno) non li abbiamo sempre inseriti con la sintassi NOME.ITA spazio / spazio NOME.SLO ? E' così su tutta la cartografia "carsica". Peccato perdere una formattazione standard
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105379815
tom_yorados (2021-05-26 21:52:33+00:00): Hallo Fifi,

willkommen bei OSM.
Frage zu deiner Änderung: was sind das für geplante Bushaltestellen?
Direkt daneben gibt es ja schon die Haltestelle "Am Terrassenpark". Die scheint auch noch aktuell, siehe https://www.vvm-info.de/fahrplaene/2629529.pdf
eggie (2021-05-26 22:04:32+00:00): Dag Hamoen.. Het is weer actueel. Ik heb het fietspad goedgelegd mbv de laatste luchtfoto quick ortho 2021
De oversteek bij de Vlaardingerweg heb ik ook voorzien van oneway=no  Het zou anders nooit kunnen routeren. 
De bushalte heb ik losgemaakt van het fietspad.
Je eigen edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=105380900

Groet
eggie
eggie (2021-05-26 22:25:04+00:00): sidewalk=right en deels left toegevoegd aan fietspad
gscscnd (2021-05-27 10:22:30+00:00): Parkingi takie jak <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947506069> tagujemy amenity=parking parking=street_side. Zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side>.
Dodko (2021-10-03 13:17:50+00:00): Tá web stránka https://tatrastower.com/ ani mail info@tatrastower.sk čo ste vložili neexistujú.
jurajik82 (2021-10-03 22:13:09+00:00): Dakujem za aktualizaciu. Prevadzkovatel zjavne presunul svoj portal na novu domenu (vyzera rovnako ako povodny).
https://web.archive.org/web/20210303052711/https://tatrastower.com/
jurajik82 (2021-10-03 22:15:44+00:00): Este stale tam maju v kontaktoch  Marketingové oddelenie
marketing@tatrastower.sk
kartonage (2021-05-27 08:52:14+00:00): Hej,

you seem to map a lot of building-objects that are not exactly building-objects but an attempt to create 3D-buildings. 

I suggest looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings before you continue. It will probably clear a few misconceptions about how to map 3D-buildings. 

Best regards
Szymson (2021-05-30 16:26:16+00:00): Sklep Lewiatan - poza tagiem building=retail należy dodać rodzaj sklepu, czyli shop=convenience i nie building:levels=0 tylko 1
Szymson (2021-05-30 16:13:59+00:00): Po co w tym miejscu multipolygon?
skyper (2021-06-14 12:56:05+00:00): Hallo Blubberbernd
In BW haben wir für Gebäude den Hintergrund "Maps4BW". Bitte verwende auch diesen, wenn Du Gebäude einträgst.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
Lee Carré (2021-05-26 23:45:58+00:00): That's a lot of (your own) editing work you undid; I'm most curious as to why.
OffTheChart (2021-05-27 08:24:41+00:00): Well I'm delighted, original old maps never had any Le or La, etc.

It was just the JT phone book back in the 1980s that muddied the waters by adding them :)
Lee Carré (2021-05-28 02:03:58+00:00): Some crafty use of various naming tags might avoid the perceived problem.

Besides name, there's short_name, official_name, alt_name, old_name, name:fr (given that so many Jersey roads are named in French), and probably some others that I'm ignorant of.
Stylez995 (2021-05-29 18:05:05+00:00): Hei.

Nedre del av Storgata er fortsatt åpent, men noe små veiarbeider igjen.

Det bør ikke settes både "highway=construction" og "construction=minor" samtidig, fordi da forsvinner gata fra kartet. Jeg har rettet opp feilen.
vorpalblade (2021-06-06 13:28:56+00:00): Quick question for you: which image did you use to verify the road signs?
All the street level imagery I have access to indicates that the speed limit is 65 mph, not 75 mph.
MavSafe (2021-06-07 14:11:25+00:00): Video Imagery from vehicle camera + gps. The issue was where the speed change occurred. I split the road segment to be able to bump the speed change to a more accurate location, matching the video imagery we have on file from 5/21/2021
Dawid2849 (2021-05-27 19:50:52+00:00): Czy aby na pewno droga już jest w budowie?
szalona_entropia (2021-05-27 19:53:59+00:00): umowa na budowę podpisana miesiąc temu
maraf24 (2021-05-27 20:05:14+00:00): I ta umowa przewiduje wykonanie przez wykonawcę projektu wykonawczego.
A może zaczęli budować bez projektu?
maraf24 (2021-05-28 09:11:35+00:00): Zdjęcie wczorajsze: https://tinyurl.com/35du2y88
RicoElectrico (2021-05-28 09:48:42+00:00): Tak więc moim zdaniem do revertu. Albo chociaż zmiany na proposed.

Drogę w budowie (itp.) oznaczamy jako w budowie na OSM jeśli fizycznie jest w budowie. Opisane to jest tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground 

Jak pokazał maraf24, łatwo to zweryfikować.
Dawid2849 (2021-05-28 09:55:52+00:00): Zmieniłem na proposed.
szalona_entropia (2021-05-28 11:32:43+00:00): No to trzeba być konsekwentnym. Dlaczego S7 w Krakowie jest construction, skoro nie jest w budowie
szalona_entropia (2021-05-28 11:32:58+00:00): Zmieniałem ją na proposed ale zostało to wycofane.
Dawid2849 (2021-05-28 14:38:33+00:00): Ja nie wiem dlaczego. Jeżeli faktycznie nie jest w budowie to powinna być jako proposed i tyle.
user_11418917 (2021-05-27 00:54:42+00:00): Super! thank you! keep up the great awesome work! :D
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105382368
PT-53 (2022-03-12 16:55:59+00:00): Hallo wermak,
keep right zeigt hier:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84010181/history
etliche Hinweise "mehrere Punkte an einem Fleck" an:
- https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=48.24051&lon=9.20887&zoom=17&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C20
Kümmerst Du Dich darum?
Fragende Grüße
HubMiner (2024-03-28 13:45:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8770461400/history

I moved opening_hours to description. opening_hours need to show ranges. Need to resurvey OH.
Lee Carré (2021-05-31 08:37:48+00:00): See (also) changeset #105526533 “10 links to the website are just too much spam”.
eggie (2021-05-27 05:35:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-27 05:38:20+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht:  
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnod
algot (2021-05-27 10:22:34+00:00): Так если дороги нет, то зачем там тег foot=yes?
Если она исчезла, то нужно удалять, а не комменты писать
Igorek2112 (2022-11-13 22:40:53+00:00): Ибо там есть единственный нормальный проход с одной стороны балки на другую, спасибо что удалил путь...
skyper (2021-11-04 12:05:20+00:00): Hallo FbrG
Hier stimmt das Spurtagging nun nicht mehr:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30301446
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998413132

Sind die beiden Abbiegespuren denn schon so früh von den restlichen Spuren baulich getrennt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30302751
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30302300

Falls nicht, sollte eher `change:lanes=*` für die Spurmarkierung verwendet werden und der Beginn der Abbiegespur näher an die Kreuzung.
Da ich es leider noch immer nicht geschafft habe Aerowest unter Debian zu verwenden, kannst Du Dir das bitte noch einmal anschauen.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2021-11-04 13:29:22+00:00): Ah, das `placement=left_of:1` sieht auch merkwürdig aus. Denke da wäre es schlauer die Straße in der Mitte der beiden Spuren einzuzeichnen. Placement braucht es dann nur bei der Stelle mit drei Spuren:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237317740
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532617319
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532617323

Verwendest Du eigentlich einen der beiden Stile für Spurtagging? Ohne wird es in Freiburg wohl kompliziert.
FbrG (2021-12-07 20:41:43+00:00): Ich schaus mir an, wenn ich mal wieder Zeit zum Mappen finde. Was Stile angeht halte ich mich in der Regel an das bestehende Tagging.
Ich benutze in JOSM u.a. das 'Lanes and Road Attributes' für direktes Feedback.
eggie (2021-05-27 05:40:39+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht:  
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnod

MVG
eggie
Stylez995 (2021-05-29 21:53:22+00:00): Hei.
Den øvre delen av Storgata er ikke åpent ennå. Den åpner fra Juni 2021.

Gata er ikke planlagt å ha enveiskjøring.
Joseph R P (2021-05-27 00:28:34+00:00): Roads can be tagged as trunk regardless of whether it has a median as long as it is a major route (or primary road) with 4 lanes or sufficient separation from other roads as well as a 40+ mph speed limit, this is stated on the wiki and is used in most other US states. Roads are also usually mapped as one tag until it reaches the next major town or intersection rather than at the end of the median or speed limit change.
ZLima12 (2021-06-01 06:12:06+00:00): There are at-grade intersections on this part of the Taconic, so it should be trunk, not motorway.
iandees (2021-05-27 05:04:55+00:00): Were these buildings and roads recently removed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105384115
iandees (2021-05-27 14:31:04+00:00): Ah yep, I see that that's where the new apartment complex is going in. Thanks for updating the map!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105384115
iandees (2021-05-27 14:31:40+00:00): Why do you keep changing the name of this island? It doesn't look like it's big enough to actually have a name...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105384125
iandees (2021-05-27 14:32:16+00:00): Normandale Road is the name of the frontage road next to the highway, not the highway itself.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105384141
aharvey (2021-05-28 13:16:16+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105384291 ways are on different levels so shouldn't share a common node
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-05-28 15:26:15+00:00): Thank you Sir for your revert (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/504331829) and your information.
Kind regards.
archpdx (2021-05-27 06:20:35+00:00): Hi alex-galaxy,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate your contributions to the map so far. I just wanted to let you know in the future, you could add houses with building=house, or just house on the editor you're using, row houses, apartment buildings, etc. This isn't absolutely necessary, but is good practice. You can read more about the different types of buildings you can add here:
https://wiki.osm.org/Key:building

If you need any help, feel free to respond to my comment. Again, thank you for your contributions and happy mapping!

-archpdx
archpdx (2021-05-27 06:22:42+00:00): Please disregard my comment, I see that you already know about building types based on other changesets.
alex-galaxy (2021-05-27 13:05:11+00:00): Hi archpdx,
I know I could have tagged the buildings as houses, I didn't because I'm not familiar with that area. Should I in the future tag buildings appropriately if it's fairly obvious what their purpose is?
archpdx (2021-05-27 23:10:57+00:00): Hi again,
Thanks for replying. I understand how you're not familiar with this area. It is particularly difficult to distinguish townhouses and apartment buildings in this area from just the imagery. I do think, however, it's best if you tag buildings appropriately if you can obviously see what their purpose is.
alex-galaxy (2021-05-27 23:55:41+00:00): Got it, I'll keep it in mind for future changesets :)
aharvey (2021-05-28 13:08:05+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105384852 it's impossible to tell from Maxar if this is a bridge or not
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-05-28 15:43:46+00:00): Thank you Sir for your revert this (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/239305046). I do agree with you. Also from imagery, it is not like a bridge around a building.
ElliottPlack (2021-05-29 06:16:14+00:00): You need to write longer changeset comments. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

What exactly was realigned and removed?
boopington (2021-06-01 21:32:05+00:00): what are these new buildings I removed and you seriously do not need to copy paste and spam me 7 times.
ElliottPlack (2021-06-04 18:51:27+00:00): I took care of the buildings. The copy paste is necessary because it creates a flag on bad changeset comments. If you follow the terms of the block you recieved from the DWG, you should not run into any trouble. One thing you can do to avoid trouble is instead of deleting stuff when there's a construction change, change the lifecycle prefix to something that tells other mappers (who may be looking at some other imagery) that this thing is recently deleted. Try this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

In one of these "massive cleanup" changes you'd removed a construction area where the work was complete. Instead of deleting, why not change the landuse to residential, commercial, or otherwise? That is why the construction landuse has a tag for the construction type.

As a courtesy to other mappers, I try to avoid deleting anything they've done. You can do the same with lifecycle prefixes and repurposing of items.