piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
streckenkundler (2017-08-23 20:03:22+00:00): Hei, du bist dir schon im Klaren, daß das hier eine Sammelrelation par excellence ist?

Vergleiche Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=660676#p660676

Bitte dort weiter disskutieren,

Ich bin mir sicher, daß eine Abfrage aller THW-Niederlassungen ohne Sammelrelation z.B. per Overpass möglich ist. 

Vergleiche:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relationen/Relationen_sind_keine_Kategorien

Auch habt ihr ein Problem mit dem Tag squad, denn es gibt eine diverse Zahl von nicht auswertbaren Tag der Form squad_n mit n=Ziffern 1-n. Eine Abfrage kann ich auf Anfrage im Forum gerne liefern. Mit einer Sinnvollen Anordnung von Tags der Gruppe operator=* und network=* sollte sich eine saubere Abfragestruktur z.B. per Overpass Turbo entwickeln lassen.

streckenkundler
eggie (2019-10-07 14:10:28+00:00): Dag Robert,
Nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-24 17:12:42+00:00): Hi, I'm guessing that this change is intended to remove access due to redevelopment of the bus station, with a number of ways having access=no added. However, where there are specific transport modes specified, these override access=no, so for example footways 16535485 and 169581775 which have foot=yes, adding access=no has no effect whatsoever. Can you please check whether you have the access you intended?

Thanks,
Mike
MissingCSAA (2017-08-24 15:31:04+00:00): Hi Reno Editor - This segment is not yet open to traffic. See images attached to story that clearly show that only the ramp to BC Pkwy is open.
d3mol3k (2018-05-30 20:30:46+00:00): Pozwoliłem sobie usunąć Twoją pracę z tej zmiany. Naniosłem ten fragment obwodnicy według projektu. Jakby co to daj znać.
czubi (2017-08-25 11:42:45+00:00): Hab Mechterstädt mal an den richtigen km verschoben.
sfrank (2019-08-11 16:41:39+00:00): Hallo,

ich war grade im Urlaub da und OsmAnd+ hat weder die Bahnübergänge angesagt /angezeigt noch wurden die Gleise angezeigt. ich würde vorschlagen statt railway:preserved lieber railway:rail und railway:preserved=yes verwenden wollen. (siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway=preserved; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:railway:preserved und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Railways die Tabelle.
Trockennasenaffe (2019-08-12 15:54:43+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe das so nicht angelegt, das war adjuva, aber ich kann mir das bei Zeiten gerne mal anschauen.
sfrank (2019-08-12 19:34:24+00:00): OK, danke. Ich wollte das "nichteinfachso" ändern, da ich nicht genau weiss, warum das so getaggt wurde.
Trockennasenaffe (2019-08-13 11:50:02+00:00): Ich denke dein Einwand ist berechtigt. Ich werde das mal ändern.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-08-23 23:28:32+00:00): exclusao area mc donalds
thatsday (2017-08-24 01:27:00+00:00): Não é o prédio todo, é apenas uma parte. O que estou deletando são erros comuns de gente que não tem lógica.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-08-24 01:41:19+00:00): erros de gente que nao tem logica? me desculpe, mas deletar coisas que outros fizeram e duplicar coisas é que nao tem logica.
user_6110846 (2018-03-15 14:54:41+00:00): рішення обласних рад не є підставою для перейменування   

Тільки рішення каб міну Ви побігли  впереді потяга
Pavlo K (2018-03-19 14:00:20+00:00): Дякую за інформацію. Справа в тому що назва "Серники" вже присутня на дорожньому знакові, саме тому вона і була змінена для OSM. На разі стара назва присутня в полі "old_name". Які Ваші пропозиції?
user_6110846 (2018-03-19 16:05:13+00:00): По цьому вже всьо норм .

Надалі звіряйте назви населених пунктів з офіційними джерелами 

У Україні анархія  і на вивиски можуть помітити всіляке. 

Щод опропозицій ще - видаляйте з населених пункті в  російську вікіпедію -  української достатньо 
Дублювання вікіпедією окупанта -це гоніво  Решта вікіпеді й  теж видаляйте - вони є зайвими
Cascafico (2018-05-16 19:18:24+00:00): controllare il valore del sac_scale (dovrebbe essere T1...T6)
freeExec (2017-08-24 12:03:39+00:00): Не нужно в имени писать тип объекта, кафе там сауна и прочее. Это уже задано другими тегами. тег name только для имени собственного.
maraf24 (2017-11-07 20:20:14+00:00): To był przeciągnięty punkt. Takie błędy naprawia się Reverterem, a nie poprzez kasowanie.
Wycofałem ten zestaw, by naprawić przeciągnięcie.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-08-23 22:52:59+00:00): Porque você deletou as vias ao redor da praça La Curuna? Por favor responda a esta pergunta aqui.
thatsday (2017-08-24 01:26:00+00:00): Pois a praça é no meio, não na rua. Entendeu? a lógica tem que ser usada, morto perto, veja no Google maps a lógica que é usada lá, rua não é praça.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-08-24 01:39:43+00:00): Mas existem ruas ao redor da praça, voce devia ter deletado apenas o nome, nao as ruas. Por favor, não faça mais isso.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-08-24 01:43:08+00:00): Vou reverter estas mudanças.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-08-24 01:43:41+00:00): Reverti as vias ao redor da praça ao estado anterior.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-08-24 01:48:21+00:00): Além do mais o Google não é usado como parâmetro para nós.
Ducky17 (2022-02-18 22:17:59+00:00): Oi andresgarcia_am, obrigado pelo mapeamento! Eu tinha uma pergunta sobre este cruzamento.
Percebi neste conjunto de alterações que você adicionou duas restrições ‘no_straight_on’ (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7502475 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7502478) e também duas restrições no_left_turns (https ://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7502476 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7502477). Essas estradas também são marcadas com oneway, então estou me perguntando se você pretendia que as restrições ‘no_straight_on’ fossem ‘only_straight_on’? Acho que ‘no_straight_on’ pode não estar correto porque, quando combinado com a restrição ‘no_left_turn’, bloqueia todas as viagens pela interseção. Eu também acho que ‘only_straight_on’ não é necessário por causa das tags unidirecionais nesta interseção. Deixe-me saber o que você pensa e se algumas dessas restrições devem ser removidas.
Obrigado!
Ducky17
DeBigC (2020-11-11 19:40:04+00:00): On Grange road, beside the fence of Naomh Barrog you mapped a few metres of footpath. It seems the community have decided against mapping footpaths as separate ways.
VictorIE (2020-11-11 20:39:43+00:00): Do you mean the pavement at Kilbarrack Way / Parade? Did you delete it?
DeBigC (2020-11-11 21:48:24+00:00): Nope, I rarely delete stuff unless I think its vandalism. Sorry the location I refer to is Kilbarrack Road https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51387045#map=19/53.38942/-6.15259
VictorIE (2020-11-11 22:24:37+00:00):  Kilbarrack Road is in a deep cutting under the railway and there are steps / ramps. The only pieces that I have mapped are those that connect different roads / carriageways.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518057990#map=19/53.39011/-6.15662

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183511119#map=18/53.39071/-6.15587

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518057988

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518057989
74523978 (2017-08-23 20:34:32+00:00): Tegelijk met mij bewerkt, conflicten ontstaan.
74523978 (2017-08-23 20:38:16+00:00): Even geen bewerkingen hier a.u.b., fouten moeten worden opgelost.
SvenvanM (2017-08-23 20:59:53+00:00): Ok
74523978 (2017-08-23 21:34:21+00:00): Conflicten opgelost, bedankt voor de medewerking.
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-24 20:10:13+00:00): HI, we already know that the pitches are tennis and football from the sport tag. Please do not add descriptive names like "tennis court" or "football pitch". The name field should only be used to add proper nouns such as "Aberporth Tennis Club".

Thanks,
Mike
ABZ_OSM (2017-08-24 20:30:39+00:00): Hi Mike,
You know that. But this project is not necessarily about what you know.
Efforts here are as part of a community empowerment project. Many people who live locally and walk or drive past that park every day, don't even know it's name widely, as it is not really listed much anywhere. So it's actually quite important to tag and name things so it's obvious what they are. We live locally and it will benefit those who live here. Unless the name pops up of itself so a local can easily see whats there I will pop the name back.
Unless openness as an obstruction this has to be a good idea for "open" street map. Lets not hide our data, right?
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:31:42+00:00): Olá, andresgarcia_am.
Nesta sua edição você criou uma proibição de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
JandaM (2018-08-23 08:19:54+00:00): Dobry den, prosim nemente polygony na relations. Spatne se s nimi pracuje. Navic se vam povedlo neopravit/zavlest vice chyb do parku v okoli Krannerovy kasny. Budova (nejspise trafostanice) je pod terenem a park ma byt cely ohranicen plotem. Nyni je prerusen u budovy.
  Dekuji
Nakaner (2017-08-23 21:14:14+00:00): Hi Inspecteur_Gadget,

this changeset looks very much like an import. Imports must comply with the Import Guideline (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines).

Could you please point me to the wiki page where it is documented? When did the discussion of this import take place on the Imports mailing list?

Please refrain from uploading further parts of this dataset or similar dataset until you have answered my questions and you have ensured that you follow the Import Guidelines.

Best regards

Michael
Inspecteur_Gadget (2017-08-24 06:26:10+00:00): Hi Michael,
This is not an import of existing data. I've been drawing it for days but on QGIS (I'll travel soon to Seychelles). Then yes, I made an export to shp and import on JOSM. Should such ways of drawing be treated as imports? I will do smaller areas in the future.

All the best, Stéphane.
Nakaner (2017-08-24 21:08:23+00:00): Hi Stéphane,

thank you for your response.

Imports are not defined by the amount of data but by the source of the data. Tracing from aerial imagery is not an import because the geometries are drawn manually. I thought it were an import because there are buildings intersecting with roads (btw, please please use the JOSM validator).

You write that you used QGIS. Why did you choose QGIS? From my experience, the drawing feature of JOSM is much better than QGIS (JOSM is being developed to draw features for OSM).

Which imagery did you use? Your buildings don't match any of the available imagery.

Best regards

Michael
Inspecteur_Gadget (2017-08-25 06:38:33+00:00): Hi Michael, thank you for taking your time helping me!
The aerial images are very different from one to other. So I used one from the Seychelles webGIS (https://www.webgis.gov.sc/). They have a beautiful and accurate image and let you download it as a GEOTIFF. That's the reason I used QGIS because JOSM performed low with large geotfiff. But yes, JOSM is better for OSM. I validated on JOSM, but I just did a validation on the buildings (because I got two layers and I didn't notice it was validating only one), that was dumb, I'll validate on all the objects and correct the errors.
Nakaner (2017-08-30 21:51:51+00:00): Hi,

sorry for answering such late.

Did the Ministry of Habitat, Infrastructure and Land Transport grant you an explicit permission to digitize features from the imagery and upload these features to OpenStreetMap? By default, we assume that aerial imagery, maps and databases underly copyright.

Best regards

Michael
Inspecteur_Gadget (2017-09-19 15:03:31+00:00): Hi Michael, sorry too, I was in Seychelles :)
No I didn't ask permission. I just read the legal FAQ (a little bit late, sorry). Here's what I suggest: I'll contact them and ask if their imagery is on public domain because I want to digitize for OSM. If the imagery is not on public domain but they allow me to use it for digitizing, I'll contact the Licensing Working Group to check if the Ministry authorization matches OSM license? Do you think it is ok or do you prefer another option?
Thanks.
Stéphane
Nakaner (2017-09-19 15:26:15+00:00): Hi Stéphane,

I agree with your plan.

Best regards

Michael
Zalitoar (2017-08-24 04:24:29+00:00): Hola alitag. En esta edición se movieron evidentemente sin querer varias "líneas" y algunos nodos deformando polígonos y calles como el helipuerto de la Clínica de los Arcos, un estacionamiento al lado del puente Pacífico, la pizzería Don Vito y parte del metrobús que llega a ése lugar, líneas de direcciones de calles y varias cosas más. El comentario de tu edición dice "Mantenimiento del túnel" ¿qué es lo que querías editar en el mapa? Te ayudo con lo que necesites para hacer el cambio que querías, pero me temo que para corregir el desplazamiento de las otras cosas modificadas sin querer es probable que deba revertir este cambio.
muralito (2017-08-25 00:14:35+00:00): Tambien mezcla numeros de puerta con paradas de bus, que no la tienen.
alitag (2017-08-25 01:39:45+00:00): ??
AgusQui (2017-08-26 13:59:52+00:00): Revertí, tiene errores por todos lados y no aporta nada: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51388096

@alitag tienes que tener mas cuidado con tus ediciones, recuerda que todo lo que hagas repercute en miles de aplicaciones de mapas, te recomiendo que mires esta guía para principiantes: http://learnosm.org/es/beginner/
Cualquier duda consultanos.
Commodoortje (2017-12-02 09:21:39+00:00): Hoi Stef.
Ik zie dat je je best gedaan hebt om het huis op nummer 61 op de kaart te krijgen.
Je hebt naastliggende woning gekopieerd.
Eigenlijk is dit niet de bedoeling.
Je kunt deze BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) updates aanvragen in dit topic.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=675304#p675304  
Op zich zijn het dezelfde huizen, in werkelijkheid zijn het er zelfs 2.
Inmiddels heb ik dit blok geïmporteerd vanuit BAG.
Commodoortje (2017-12-02 09:23:08+00:00): Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54264343
DeBigC (2022-05-10 04:10:41+00:00): The shopping centre car park seems to be drawn twice here. There are a number of issues, one version incorporates a service/loading yard on the west of the building. Other things I would point out is that the car park is drawn as a connected feature to the building, but on the ground it doesn't as there is a walkway gap
SomeoneElse (2017-08-24 13:10:29+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:32:03+00:00): Olá, Eduscott.
Nesta sua edição você criou uma proibição de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
RicoElectrico (2021-06-25 14:19:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2728012
SGroe (2017-08-24 06:15:53+00:00): Hi! Warum löscht du Objekte wie den Platz (leisure=pitch) beim Feuerwehrhaus in Tschierweg und am Golfplatz das Green von Loch 13?
wfrvi (2017-08-24 08:01:07+00:00): Hi SGroe ! 
Das Green am Loch 13 war doppelt (JOSM prüffunktion). Den Platz wollte ich eigentlich nicht löschen. Daneben war ein Haus aus dem Jahr 2008 od. 2009 - am basemap Orthofoto war's aber weg. Sorry das muss ein Fehler gewesen sein. Seh mir das am Abend an....

Schönen Tag
LG aus Villach
WFRVI
wfrvi (2017-08-24 20:20:36+00:00): Hallo SGroe !

Ich hab mir alle Löschungen aus diesem Changeset nochmals angesehen. Das Green war wirklich doppelt und ist nach wie vor vorhanden. Die anderen sind auch OK gewesen nur das Gebäude und der Sportplatz waren ein Fehler. Die hab ich mit Changeset 51417691 wieder zurück geholt. Kann mir momentan nicht erklären wie die Löschung passiert ist - normal checke ich die letzte Änderung mit dem Alter des Orthofotos... Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Muss da noch genauer acht geben. Wie hast Du das so schnell gefunden ? Kann man irgendwo tracken ob eigene Änderungen gelöscht werden ?

VIelen Dank und Sorry nochmal
Schönen Tag
LG
Wolfi
SGroe (2017-08-28 10:44:37+00:00): Ich habe bei http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/ einen Feed abonniert, der mir alle Änderungen in der Umgebung zusammenfasst. In der RSS-Nachricht gibt es dann einige Links, darunter zu Achavi. Damit werden die Änderungen übersichtlich dargestellt. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51391248 für diesen Changeset
lg
wfrvi (2017-08-30 04:43:37+00:00): Guten Morgen ! Super Tip - Vielen Dank
Schönen Tag
LG
Wolfi
wille (2017-08-24 14:20:48+00:00): Olá, Robinson!

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap!

Uma dica: evite abreviar nomes ao mapear. No OSM, a não ser quando não sabemos o nome completo, sempre mapeamos sem abreviar. Assim não escrevemos Jd. Prof. R. Av. e escrevemos as palavras completas.

Obrigado! abçs,
chnuessli (2020-04-02 20:35:16+00:00): Macht das Sinn das Teilstück so zu taggen? Das Gleis ist nicht mehr da, es ist auch nichts mehr davon sichtbar?
gormur (2020-04-14 14:56:42+00:00): Did you have a particular way or relation in mind?
Perhaps you are talking about https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7503548 ?
I (and many others) find it interesting to have data about old and removed train and tramlines in OSM.
I did not know about this particular line when I traveled through the area, but I saw many hints of it; old station buildings, embankments, alignments etc. But no tracks. Very visible to me, perhaps not so visible for you :)
It gave me great pleasure to research and discover the whole alignment and have to have all the little hints explained.
Also, many Wikipedia articles use this data to display the historic line in a map.

So I think this data is very suitable for OSM :)

All the best
Polarbear-repair (2017-09-15 20:16:41+00:00): As you appear to have seen that the door is hinged, why do you not know if they are suitable for wheelchairs?

Anyway, we do not tag things that are unknown.
Geography Canada (2017-09-15 20:35:27+00:00): Sorry, this is obviously wheelchair accessible. I don't know what I was thinking :D!
Geography Canada (2017-09-15 20:36:26+00:00): I've fixed it in my latest changeset. Thanks :).
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-30 12:30:16+00:00): Hello! What you wanted to mark by natural=stream at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5055007321/history ?
nevw (2017-08-24 07:35:21+00:00): Hi
the items you are mapping are not suitable for the OSM. They need to be physical features generally and have real geographical information. A poi with just a website and description or such info attached to an unrelated poi is considered spam. I think that such edits are likely ok to put on Google maps.
-your edit is reverted
muralito (2017-08-25 00:25:33+00:00): El hospital ya estaba mapeado.http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123462978 

Por favor no duplicar los elementos.
bbmiller (2017-08-24 11:44:13+00:00): Nope. These parks do exist in their mapped locations, and if you look at the history of these ways, they existed way before the Pokemon phenomenon. Would you please revert your change set? Or should I?
filth (2017-08-24 19:49:03+00:00): ahh my apologies.  i figured they were there for pokemon purposes.  however they are not parks so should be taken out regardless.  my dad lives a block away at rose court and i walk by there weekly there's no parks at those locations
filth (2017-08-24 19:52:45+00:00): someone probably added them for ingress then and not pokemon i'm guessing?  both are residential areas, there's just houses there, no parks
MikeN (2017-08-24 21:19:48+00:00): Traverse City still lists those two parks as active http://www.traversecitymi.gov/downloads/boon_street_arbutus_ct_2010.pdf
bbmiller (2017-08-25 01:09:34+00:00): Yeah, and they're visible on Street View: https://www.google.com/maps/@44.7442222,-85.5970059,3a,90y,3.83h,74.93t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1st9KpajR0D8L7FSJPwTd9pw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@44.7442259,-85.5988699,3a,75y,343.87h,69.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLyODIlwG5bEai-bSjYJT1Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

I can swing by tomorrow and get my own photos if I need to...
bbmiller (2017-08-25 12:30:17+00:00): OK, I got curious and swung by Boon St this morning. Sure enough, the parks are there, just as mapped.

Boon Street Park: https://flic.kr/p/Xsj2mA
Arbutus Court Park: https://flic.kr/p/Y4oR8p

I'm undeleting these. I'm also going to take advantage of this opportunity to add a few details, so that's a win!
mavl (2017-08-24 17:21:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. В OSM принято указывать "Строительная улица", а не "улица Строительная".
jharpster (2017-08-24 15:53:49+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the contribution. It looks like you changed the street name from West 29th Street to Sign Services. Are you sure the street name here has changed? Or was that your intention?
jharpster (2017-08-25 19:53:55+00:00): I'm going to revert the edit back to West 29th ST
Supaplex (2017-08-25 04:45:19+00:00): 盡可能從既有的資料改，而不是重新建資料，如留note
muralito (2017-08-29 21:26:02+00:00): Esa y otras tantas cosas con erroes y horrores por desconocimiento de la realidad local e imposibilidad de que aprendieran.

El relevamiento supuestamente fue por video (nunca lo vi) y como lo hacian los fines de semana y a horas de poco trafico para relevar mas rapido, no tenian idea (o como saber) de que muchas cosas estaban cerradas y mapeaban por la fachada cerrada sin confirmar que el elemento estuviera activo.
Zalitoar (2017-08-30 02:45:09+00:00): Algo de lo que me percaté (no sé si alguien más lo hizo) es que borraron deliberadamente cosas que ya estaban relevadas -y bien- y las reemplazaron. Así he visto que varias cosas que había mapeado, sobre todo comercios ya no me incluían en el historial... así llegué a la conclusión de que hacían esto ¿notaste algo similar? Además de esto, editan OSM porque luego generan extractos de la base para dispositivos GPS que los venden sin siquiera hacer la referencia o atribución apropiada. Esto para mí ya amerita denunciarlos a la OSMF.
Zalitoar (2017-08-30 02:54:38+00:00): En la mayoría de los casos eliminaron puntos de interés que estaban bien solo para volver a ponerlos como edificios. En el sitio https://www.gpstravelmaps.com/gps-maps/south-america/argentina.php aparece abajo de todo mencionado "Kaart Group". En el "acerca de" (https://www.gpstravelmaps.com/about.php) hay una sección "Nuestros datos" en el que dice que mantienen una red de personas que relevan los datos en diferentes lugares pero en ninguna parte hacen atribución a OpenStreetMap, como si los datos que ellos comercializan no contuvieran más que los datos que supuestamente relevan.
AgusQui (2017-08-30 13:45:36+00:00): Para mi es evidente que la mayoría de ellos cobran por lo mapeado, por eso le metían relevamiento kaart a todo, a cosas que estaban mapeadas hace años y a POIS que borran y los vuelven a dibujar como edificios (la mayoría de las veces no coincide con la satelital).
muralito (2017-08-30 13:56:04+00:00): Si quieren seguimos conversando en el foro... y dejamos los comentarios del cambio para lo que son...
AgusQui (2017-08-30 17:10:15+00:00): Ya fue, hace rato que no mapean por acá, si llegan a aparecer otra vez les mandamos el DWG (◣_◢)
Владимир К (2017-08-24 06:56:47+00:00): Откатываю.
streinger (2017-08-24 17:58:25+00:00): это всё входит в с. Южный Урал,  и не относится к Оренбургу.
П3тр0виЧъ (2017-08-25 02:46:14+00:00): Я только названия улиц сменил, город до меня проставлен был. Адресацию я поправлю, но по большому счету нужно все дома здесь удалять, потому что они от балды проставлены, без привязки по спутнику.