piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Krkoska (2021-09-13 11:49:40+00:00): Hi, 
the current curve is created "somehow" incorrectly, it does not appear in the mapbox. She was fine when I created a new one. What am I supposed to do then? Thank you for the advice. 
j.k
osmviborg (2021-09-13 11:59:17+00:00): There i nothing wrong with the buildings. Besides that you must use SDFE arial images in DK. We don't add addresses to buildings either.
Krkoska (2021-09-13 12:19:42+00:00): There is something wrong. The shapes before worked well.
Krkoska (2021-09-13 12:49:57+00:00): I'm sorry, but I had to do it. We have a client who owns this building and we use a system that depends on this shapes you reworked, and we work with exact floorplans. I need the shape in our system but this shapes doesn´t work. I don´t know why ...
osmviborg (2021-09-13 13:02:11+00:00): This is not how OSM work. Data in OSM shows the world as it is. If the data don't fit into your renderer, that just to bad. We do not tag for the renderer.
Krkoska (2021-09-13 13:32:08+00:00): And ... how is it possible, that my "vandal-shape" is working and "your" not?
osmviborg (2021-09-13 14:00:18+00:00): Perhaps because the building is drawn as a multipolygon. A multipolygon is not tagged on its outer way. Yours was a ordinary closed way.
Krkoska (2021-09-13 16:34:46+00:00): Yes, that makes sense ... 
Thank you so much! :-)
vulasala (2021-09-14 05:03:10+00:00): Hi irina_dosa,
Trust you are doing well. I have removed the way 982771711, as there is no such path based on ground truth.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111140347
AntMadeira (2021-09-13 16:20:34+00:00): Olá, Pedro.
Só para avisar que esta torre já se encontrava mapeada no local. Eliminei-a para não estar repetida no mapa.
Qualquer dúvida, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
jeka p (2021-12-14 21:14:02+00:00): diesen Weg habe ich heute auch nicht gesehen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982770813
Welche Luftbilder hast Du benutzt?
hlfan (2021-12-15 13:03:24+00:00): Anscheinend ein neues, das unscharf genug ist, dass ich die Rad-Fußweg-Verbindung als Rampe interpretiert hab...
Mit ein wenig mehr Recherche hätte ich im September wahrscheinlich schon https://www.vn.at/2021/09/20210902-1046-1.jpg entdecken können.
Ich hab mich jetzt mal an https://www.vn.at/2021/12/drei-jahre-lang-wurde-an-der-neuen-autob.jpg orientiert und in Änderungssatz 114963557 das ausgebessert.
user_5359 (2021-09-13 16:24:12+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! Please us the key building instead of buildings!
maraf24 (2021-09-14 18:46:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580241858
Wyburzyli, że jest brownfield?
Przesunęli płot bliżej budynku? Na orto z 2020 jest tam, gdzie zawsze.
maraf24 (2021-09-14 18:50:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/576858088/history
Zadaszenie nad wejściem było prawidłowe. Ew, można było przerobić na building:part.
Mordechai23 (2021-09-14 18:50:25+00:00): nie ma ani płotu, ani budowy, a wokół budynki się wala gruz i śmieci
maraf24 (2021-09-14 18:55:03+00:00): Jak nie ma płotu to landuse jest zbędne.
Było construction, bo było oznaczone na płocie jako teren budowy.
Mordechai23 (2021-09-14 18:56:07+00:00): okej przeszedłem się i płot zniknął tylko częściowo, od strony straganów
Dimitar155 (2021-09-14 20:21:30+00:00): Здравейте. Добавих липсващата сграда. Можете ли да добавите повече информация за вашия бизнес? Например работно време, телефон за контакт, уебсайт и какви услуги предлагате? Ако не знаете как става, може да ги напишете като коментар тук и аз ще ги добавя.
Lepidobatrachus (2021-09-20 10:40:41+00:00): Можете пояснить, по каким правилам вы на подобные проезды и дороги на дачах ставите ограничения скорости 20, 10, 5 км/ч? По крайней мере на яндекс панорамах никаких ограничивающих знаков я не нашел
2GarinZmei (2021-09-20 10:46:43+00:00): По тем, что там двигаться возможно физически только с такой скоростью, иначе роутинг будет работать не корректно, по хорошему там вообще проезд можно закрыть.
literan (2021-09-20 13:34:20+00:00): тег maxspeed предназначен не для "двигаться возможно физически только с такой скоростью", а для указания разрешенной максимальной скорости.

То, что вы проставляете, следует указывать в теге maxspeed:practical
2GarinZmei (2021-09-20 13:54:16+00:00): Ок, хорошо, спасибо поправлю!
wonderb0lt (2021-09-13 12:15:07+00:00): Actual source: Bing and Mapbox. Sorry.
DD1GJ (2021-09-14 08:25:54+00:00): Steht das Gebäude noch oder wurde es abgerissen?
flohoff (2021-09-14 09:29:48+00:00): Im Luftbild ist das noch zu sehen. Also ist löschen schonmal der falsche weg. Wenn es abgerissen ist dann mit lifecycle tags arbeiten. 

Der Changelog comment deutet aber darauf hin das es nur in der Nutzung aufgegeben wurde aber noch steht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111142800
osmviborg (2021-09-13 12:21:51+00:00): Vandalism. Deleted.
maraf24 (2021-09-14 15:35:29+00:00): Mieszkalne: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982783656
Mordechai23 (2021-09-14 16:07:16+00:00): uszczegółowiłem
eggie (2021-10-24 08:12:17+00:00): Dag mrk1  Wanneer je iets algemeen op slot zet met access=destinaion ( Zuringkade) zal het bv niet meer voor wandelaars routeren. Ik heb er motor_vehicle=destination van gemaakt. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-24 08:17:12+00:00): Je edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111143196
Dat stuk vooraan heb ik ook maar als G13 fietspad getagd conform het bord. 
Erg duidelijk is het allemaal niet daar. 
MVG
eggie
lonnez (2021-12-29 18:09:15+00:00): Someone left a note on the map in a similar vein, but I assume these areas aren't actually called "Private Property", right? And that this should probably be tagged as access? Or really would this not just be implied by it not being within the forest?
nevw (2021-09-13 21:43:05+00:00): Just a comment....
that service roads can be be publicly accessible. If tagged as residential, routers will use for local traffic movement within the suburb. This narrow roadway seems more of a service road for residential parking and access to rear of properties. 
I think highway=service may be more suitable.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Argonandon (2021-09-14 11:36:10+00:00): Thanks for that. Fixed.
maraf24 (2021-09-14 16:23:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101656351
W tym miejscu są dwa budynki, dlatego były dwa obrysy.
Widać nawet po adresacji: 36-38
nevw (2021-09-13 21:48:17+00:00): Likewise here...I expect highway=service is more suitable than residential.
Argonandon (2021-09-14 01:10:56+00:00): Understood. Will change back.
RoYank (2021-10-04 19:09:42+00:00): Здравствуйте, здорово, что вы добавляете на карту кафе и рестораны. Но, пожалуйста, не вставляйте в название описание. Т.е. тут должно быть "Healthy Conscience", без всяких "суши роллы". 

Это важно для карты. Название должно передавать название заведения как оно есть на самом деле.
Smollett (2021-10-05 09:12:48+00:00): у этого маппера много прекрасного
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111439075
RoYank (2021-10-05 09:42:33+00:00): Ресторан "Хорошие Люди Внутри" действительно есть :) https://www.instagram.com/rest.vnutri/?hl=ru
Kerkiq (2021-11-18 21:55:05+00:00): Если там асфальт местами то возможно покрытие compacted или gravel. Ground - это если асфальта вообще нет ни в каком виде
nevw (2021-09-13 13:08:52+00:00): Hi
If a street has a portion that is not publically accessible, it still needs to be mapped. Just add the tag access=no to that section.
Argonandon (2021-09-13 13:12:17+00:00): Sorry! I'm still learning! Could you do that for me?
nevw (2021-09-13 13:16:29+00:00): Yes, I’ll do it tomorrow. Cheers.
nevw (2021-09-13 21:16:52+00:00): I see the area is under construction and street part no longer exists.
Argonandon (2021-09-14 00:59:01+00:00): Yes, that's right. I don't know if it will be reinstated in the future but its part of the construction zone now
maraf24 (2021-09-14 15:30:11+00:00): Dałem fixme: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291940045
chyba że masz pewność, że istnienie. 
Droga w takim kształcie istniała przed przebudową okolicy, byłem tam rok temu i tak jak na orto - śladu po niej wtedy nie było.
Mordechai23 (2021-09-14 15:57:44+00:00): też pójde sprawdzić
maraf24 (2021-09-14 16:30:00+00:00): Możliwe, że dojazd na teren basenu jest teraz od strony działek.
Mordechai23 (2021-09-14 16:48:12+00:00): właśnie tak bym obstawiał
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-14 19:21:34+00:00): Similarly here, I think B3 6JS should be B43 6JS and B3 6LG should be B43 6LG
brianboru (2021-09-15 07:44:07+00:00): oops1 mre finger touble now fixed
Josef73 (2022-03-30 05:04:38+00:00): Hello, what type of shop is this?
KBastien (2022-03-30 05:37:43+00:00): Hello, it's a home equipment store, plate, curtain, tablecloth, knives, etc.
dieterdreist (2023-10-29 18:13:43+00:00): Hi witkoo, please add surface values from survey, they cannot be seen reliably on aerial imagery, e.g. I noticed you added "asphalt" to the pedestrian area in front of the Basilica San Paolo, but there are paving stones. Fixed it now.

Anyway, have fun mapping :)
confusedbuffalo (2021-09-14 19:18:23+00:00): Hi, what's your source for the postcodes here?
The ones that you've added as B3 6DT I think should be B43 6DT and likewise B3 6DX to B43 6DX
brianboru (2021-09-15 07:39:56+00:00): oops! finger touble - now fixed
ivanbranco (2021-09-14 15:30:04+00:00): Ciao Luca, 

benvenuto su OSM! Ti ricordo che c'è anche un gruppo Telegram italiano se vuoi partecipare o fare domande :)

Una cosa riguardo alle strade, per esempio nel caso di questa track, non c'è bisogno di inserire sempre "bicycle=yes, foot=yes, horse=yes, motor_vehicle=yes" ecc. in quanto sono già sottintesi da "track". Puoi vedere qua le modalità di accesso implicite: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Italy
Luca_Fly (2021-09-15 09:30:49+00:00): Ciao Ivan, ok grazie del chiarimento.
Mariusz*M (2021-09-14 20:16:04+00:00): Witam
Prawdę mówiąc do edycji użyłem Street-Complete.apk. Apka podaje czego brak na mapie, więc podałem numer bo o to"prosiła". Może dlatego pojawił się ten błąd. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi.
ivanbranco (2021-09-13 15:46:34+00:00): Hi normelton,

you added a lot of invalid tags with this changeset, see:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981850462/history

Can you fix it?

Also see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
normelton (2021-09-13 19:29:58+00:00): Looks like someone else beat me to it. Thanks for the tip, I'll try to be more careful next time!
orthocircular (2021-09-13 19:26:39+00:00): Thanks for your contributions! Be sure to not connect features together unless they're truly physically connected in the real world: I separated out the golf course boundary from the fairways and cart paths. Also feel free to expand the boundaries to match the map: the eastern third of the mapped course was outside the boundary so I expanded the boundary. Finally, for any kind of GPS to work paths need to be connected even if it doesn't 100% match up to the aerial image, so I connected some cart paths to the parking lot and each other. There were some cart paths along the southern edge that I couldn't tell how they connected, but if there is a preferred path network it'd be a good idea to fully map that in case any golfers use GPS to get around.

Thanks again!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111146762
dborden0 (2021-09-14 23:47:22+00:00): Sorry! I didn't realize that I connected features. The golf cart paths aren't really for navigating on this course. They are just short strips. The main reason for the additions is because the golf course information is imported from openstreetmap into golf simulation software along with LIDAR data to generate virtual golf courses that realistically duplicate existing courses. Adding the cart paths makes the virtual golf courses visually realistic in the golf simulators. I can not add them if it causes problems.
orthocircular (2021-09-15 02:05:17+00:00): Disconnected cart paths generate warnings, but if it's the best representation we have of the reality on the ground then that's what we've got to work with. If you find an official map of the course or know where carts are supposed to go, connecting them can be great, otherwise there's no problem with how they currently are.

The reason to not connect stuff is, if you move one it affects the other. So i.e. I expanded the course to fit the features, and bits of sand trap and fairway were getting pulled with it.
kartonage (2021-09-14 08:52:24+00:00): Reverted in cs 111182975, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110965617 for more information.

Thanks
Rom1 (2021-09-15 19:51:56+00:00): Bonjour, ce serait bien que tout le monde ait accès aux données du Grand Nancy en cours d'intégration parce que cela permettrait aux contributeurs locaux d'indiquer les données erronées exemple https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9088055347 Aussi, si on pouvait en savoir plus sur https://twitter.com/geovelofr/status/1418220895122825228 et venir échanger sur la liste locale https://listes.openstreetmap.fr/wws/info/local-meurthe-et-moselle ? Merci.
Axelos (2021-11-07 13:54:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Je soutiens la sollicitation de Romain à ce sujet.

Bien cordialement, Axel.
kartonage (2021-09-14 08:52:42+00:00): Reverted in cs 111182975, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110965617 for more information.

Thanks
maraf24 (2021-09-14 15:39:19+00:00): A na tej trawce rozbudowują parking: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/982804235
;)
kartonage (2021-09-14 08:52:40+00:00): Reverted in cs 111182975, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110965617 for more information.

Thanks
Andrea Musuruane (2021-09-15 15:43:06+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Per favore, non usare le immagini aeree di Bing perché non sono ben allineate nelle nostre zone. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Per cambiare sfondo con iD, prova a guardare questo screenshot: https://imgur.com/1wjkVbr Oppure, se vuoi usare le Bing, le devi riallinearle manualmente usando la funzione "Offset delle immagini" in iD: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#iD Ciao, Andrea
---
Luca_Fly (2021-09-16 09:44:41+00:00): Ciao Andrea, grazie della precisazione. Seguirò le tue indicazioni.
kawino85 (2021-11-27 12:39:19+00:00): We all believe you ;) but that's still a useless changeset comment.
user_8722718 (2021-10-13 14:05:45+00:00): Danke, tjum
fgouget (2022-11-16 02:35:13+00:00): Bonjour,

Notez que vous pouvez utiliser la couche Volta pour identifier les lignes Enedis et compléter leurs attributs.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Serveurs/tile.openstreetmap.fr#Rendu_%22Volta%22_des_r%C3%A9seaux_%C3%A9lectriques

Notamment :
frequency=50
operator=Enedis
operator:wikidata=Q3587594

Et généralement :
cables=3
voltage=20000 (ou 400 pour les raccordements clients en vert)

Cordialement,
kartonage (2021-09-14 08:52:37+00:00): Reverted in cs 111182975, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110965617 for more information.

Thanks
Ram Kapil (2022-12-30 13:00:30+00:00): great job !!
viplavm (2023-01-03 12:36:49+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for the appreciation. Looking forward to contribute more. Happy mapping.

Regards,
viplavm
aixbrick (2021-09-14 05:33:11+00:00): Hallo,
seit wann ist die Jakobstraße als "echte" Einbahnstraße beschildert? Bislang gab es nur ein "Verbot der Einfahrt" (VZ 267) aus Richtung Schanz.
Gruß
Gaessje (2021-09-14 07:14:16+00:00): Das stimmt. Ich habe die Eintragung der Einbahnstraße wieder  gelöscht.
aixbrick (2021-09-14 09:55:39+00:00): Leider etwas zu schnell: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4992147 war korrekt getaggt, siehe den "note".
aixbrick (2021-09-21 08:03:33+00:00): Danke für deine Korrektur. Ich habe das oneway=yes wieder gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111481077.
hu9o (2021-09-16 15:01:38+00:00): <3
Dino Michelini (2021-09-14 07:48:09+00:00): Ciao, ti segnalo che utilizzare leisure=sports_centre non è appropriato per una falesia naturale. Forse andrebbe mappata la falesia con una geometria natural=cliff ed aggiungere climbing=crag oppure disegnare un area climbing=area completando le info con altri tag. Vedi la wiki di OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Climbing
Granodiorite (2021-09-14 19:24:22+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la correzione. Ti ho mandato un messaggio in privato
Frans S (2021-09-13 14:39:19+00:00): Hello. Thank you for mapping on this project.  Accurate mapped. !
Just 1 remark.
Please do not cross other features like residential area borders. Just move them outside the buildings
Best regards and keep mapping
skyper (2021-11-12 16:15:20+00:00): Hallo EM311

Kannst Du Dir bitte den Wert von `railway:signal:main:states`  der folgenden Signale nochmal anschauen. Ich vermute da hat ein JOSM Bug zugeschlagen. 
Grüße skyper

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1684368457
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1735154320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1735154318
EM311 (2021-11-14 08:18:05+00:00): Ich schaue mir das heute an.
EM311 (2021-11-14 13:00:39+00:00): Repariert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113761724
skyper (2021-11-15 12:11:00+00:00): Daanke
kartonage (2021-09-14 08:52:35+00:00): Reverted in cs 111182975, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110965617 for more information.

Thanks
kapazao (2021-09-14 21:55:44+00:00): No sabía que se llamaban Edificio A y B. Estaría bien si puedes dejar referencias para saber de dónde vienen los nombres.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111149532
Pipeton (2021-09-14 21:59:05+00:00): Lo pone en los carteles allí. Tendría que haber puesto source=survey en el changeset.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:44:50+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import by OEG, possibly using unauthorised data sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522524
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:11:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
Carto'Cité (2022-01-05 09:26:36+00:00): Bonjour Thomas,
J'ai complété ce que tu avais commencé ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806945790
J'ai utilisé les photos Mapillary de mon collègue Stéphane pour ajouter toutes portions de voies vertes du secteur. N'hésite pas à ajouter traffic_sign=FR:C115 sur les voies et segregated=no (si c'est le cas) ; ça permet de mieux distinguer les types d'aménagements :)
À dispo pour en discuter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Truchin (2022-01-05 14:42:27+00:00): Bonjour Charles et bonne année,

En fait, je suis passé sur cette route une fois dans ma vie (un aller retour). Donc j'ai tagué sur la base de mon souvenir, sans trop savoir si la collectivité avait bien fait les choses :)
Carto'Cité (2022-01-05 19:37:07+00:00): OK merci pour ton retour :D
Et bonne année année :)
Charles