piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
adrianojbr (2022-06-03 00:45:46+00:00): Olá, Bruno! Precisei transferir as etiquetas do escritório de engenharia da área para um ponto, já que a área representa o edifício e o escritório divide a ocupação com outros estabelecimentos. No mais, obrigado por contribuir com o OpenStreetMap. Abraço!
gusfak (2022-06-07 21:15:53+00:00): Please don't write ALL UPPERCASE.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 12:44:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122578207 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, undoing a remote change of sells:wine=yes to drink:wine=yes
SomeoneElse (2022-06-19 12:48:04+00:00): The drink: namespace has about 20k uses https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=drink and the sells: namespace about 400 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=sells , but both are in use.  However it is unclear what "drink" value would be valid here; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drink:wine?uselang=en-GB and even https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drink are very unclear.
Changing a tag from one typo to another is fine, but this clearly isn't a "typo fix".  Perhaps have a chat with the person who originally added the tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102319920 ?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 12:51:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122578519 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, undoing a remote change of sells:wine=yes to drink:wine=yes
SomeoneElse (2022-06-19 12:52:12+00:00): (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121864134 for more discussion about a similar change)
EneaSuper (2022-06-04 14:28:49+00:00): Ciao, in questo negozio si vendono ma non si somministrano bevante.

Ergo io, entrando, posso acquistare del vino, ma non posso consumarlo in loco.
mbeyerle (2022-06-04 14:58:11+00:00): Gotcha. If I’m interpreting you correctly I think the specific tagging scheme should be drink:wine=bottled 

Based on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drink

Thanks for reviewing!
dieterdreist (2022-06-04 16:27:04+00:00): Please, you should never change tags for objects you don’t know in person, and generally there is no reason to remove a tag like sells:wine if you want to add one with a different key like drink:wine (if it would be correct, which happens to not be the case here but could well exist somewhere else).

Cheers
Martin
dieterdreist (2022-06-04 16:30:26+00:00): drink:wine according to the page you linked is  “to describe the specific drink which is served”, so it is not correct with “bottled” either, that would be the case that you would be served bottled wine.
mbeyerle (2022-06-04 17:02:15+00:00): Hi Martin, thanks for joining the conversation! While I completely agree with the premise that local knowledge drives quality on OSM, I think there’s definitely a case to be made for making remote fixes (and I think “never” touching objects that a mapper doesn’t know in person is too limiting). For example, if someone tagged the inner of a multipolygon as “innner” I assert that correction should be made even if outside of a mapper’s local area.

For this specific instance, could you link me to the page in the wiki that suggests sells:wine should be used instead of drink:wine? I’ve not been able to find that page but would love your help.
dieterdreist (2022-06-04 17:35:51+00:00): If a tag is not in the wiki it doesn’t imply it should be removed. There is no either or for tags unless they are using the same key. In this case it seems a bakery sells wine, so sells:wine seems a perfect fit. drink:* is about a tag where you can specify which drinks a place serves (to consume on the premises), so it doesn’t apply to this bakery.
mbeyerle (2022-06-04 17:48:17+00:00): drink:* does not imply a beverage is to be consumed on the premises. Otherwise every liquor store tagged with drink:wine would be incorrect. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dalcohol
dieterdreist (2022-06-04 20:36:31+00:00): you are correct that the page states the tag  drink is used for beverages served or sold (it is written differently in different places), but still it is not a reason to remove the sells:wine tag because it is more specific and doesn’t include drinks served, it is only about selling them
dieterdreist (2022-06-05 13:42:24+00:00): As we seem to agree that the tag removal was misguided, I reverted this part of this edit. Looking at your profile, I noticed you performed several of these edits which all removed sells:wine so we would have information loss in all these cases. Please discuss semiautomatic edits like this beforehand and please bring all these sells:wine that you have removed, back on the map. Currently there are zero sells:wine in the database.

Cheers 
Martin
bhietsch (2022-06-05 15:19:08+00:00): Martin, I disagree that mbeyerle's tag removal was misguided simply by the premise that sells:wine is a more specific tag. Would it be logical for users to replace generally standardized tagging schemes with keys or tags that they believe add specificity on the notion that it will provide end users with greater detail? By your logic, it would be acceptable to replace surface=gravel with surface=crushed_stone_#5 because that specifies the exact grade of gravel. How will the community ever reach harmonious agreement on tagging standards if we don't do small and harmless cleanups like the one in this edit, where the lesser used sells:wine key was replaced with one that implied that wine is sold based on established wiki definitions?
dieterdreist (2022-06-05 16:38:01+00:00): I did not say to remove anything, and I did not remove the drink:wine tag which mbeyerle has added to this place without knowing it, despite believing it has generally a problem as it isn’t clear whether it is only for places serving a specific drink or also for sale only. I agree that _replacing_ a tag with something more specific has to be weighted against how established/agreed the replacement is. The case at hand is different, because a more specific tag was removed and a more generic/unclear different one added, without any need (different key) and remotely on several places which the editor probably did not know either.
dieterdreist (2022-06-05 16:51:30+00:00): bhietsch, can you understand it makes a huge difference whether a bakery sells wine (to drink at home) or it serves wine to drink on the premises? A tag that can mean both seems almost useless to me, if this was the choice in your part of the world it may work for you, around here we buy the wine in every supermarket and convenience store, in dedicated wine stores, on the market (this is a place where local producers sell fruit, vegetables, meat, fish, etc. to end consumers), or have it bottled from huge tanks in dedicated shops. Most or all of these are implicit (the markets mostly don’t get mapped with single booths), the sells:wine tag is only used for exceptional cases. There are no supermarkets that don’t sell wine. For us it is very important if you can drink it there or not.
mbeyerle (2022-06-05 18:15:25+00:00): Hi Martin, 

First, I wanted to say thanks for the passion for the project and for bringing the local cultural differences to my (our) attention. 
I see what you mean and agree it's important to not lose fidelity in tagging and wanted to thank you for reviewing and helping accomplish that. However, I think this can and should be accomplished within the only the drink:* key. I've edited its talk page to bring about a community discussion about approproate values: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:drink#Replacement_for_%22retail%22%3F

It's been observed that the wiki page for drink:* has been edited without ample discussion, and I think that's part of the problem.

For this instance specifically, I think the beverage selection at this bakery could be described in one tag (my proposal being "drink:wine=retail") but you've brought about the important point that the wiki is unclear.

Since I see you have an OSM wiki page, would you be willing to look at and maybe even comment on the proposal I've made on the talk page for drink:* linked above? I think together we can help clarify this issue for future mappers by improving the wiki.
dieterdreist (2022-06-05 18:56:48+00:00): great, let’s move over to the wiki
dieterdreist (2022-06-05 19:52:17+00:00): I had missed a section in the wiki about the values for the drink: tag and agree it can be used for this place. It wasn’t documented in the value table but I added it (commonly used already), the generic value is “retail”
tux67 (2022-06-03 09:25:07+00:00): Hallo XuMee,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Ist das ein fester Blitzer? Wenn ja - dann am besten mit einer enforcement relation mappen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:enforcement ansonsten vielleicht direction hinzufügen.

Prima, dass du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121864160
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 12:49:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122578414 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, undoing a remote change of sells:wine=yes to drink:wine=yes
SomeoneElse (2022-06-19 12:50:25+00:00): (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121864134 for more discussion about a similar change)
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:57:05+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121864212
ivanbranco (2022-06-02 20:28:08+00:00): Hi bbgg,

"fixme=There is only one route and is always north of the Po river"

sorry, I don't understand what is to be fixed here.
bbgg (2022-06-05 05:17:31+00:00): On OpenStreetMap there are two routes, but there is only one route and is always north of the Po river.
See the correct route here:
https://en.eurovelo.com/ev8/italy
ivanbranco (2022-06-05 08:08:45+00:00): Ok, I think you are referring to the 4a (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9584949) and 4b (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9585794) stages.

The Wikipedia page states:
"In Italy, the EV8 goes through Turin, Piacenza (EV5), Mantua (EV7), Ferrara, Venice, and Trieste (EV9)." Piacenza is on the south of the Po River for example.

Also:
"From Pavia, the EV8 follows either of two branches of the BicItalia 2 (BI2) route along the Po river valley: these are the BI 2 Ciclovia del Po e delle Lagune EV8 and the BI 2 Ciclovia Destra Po EV8.", the "Ciclovia Destra Po EV8" passes on the south of the Po River.

The official website (https://en.eurovelo.com/ev8/italy) says: " EuroVelo 8 in Italy is based on the Bicitalia 2 Po Cycle Route"

I personally think that the fixme can be removed.
bbgg (2022-06-07 05:34:01+00:00): Hi,
on http://www.bicitalia.org/it/bicitalia/gli-itinerari-bicitalia/61-bi2%20-%20ciclovia-del-po
there is this warning:
"Attenzione!
A seguito della revisione della struttura della Rete Ciclabile Nazionale di Bicitalia i testi ed i percorsi sono in fase di aggiornamento."

let's close the fix request and wait to see how the route will be when the change is completed.
user_5359 (2022-06-03 10:03:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1066229638. What is the meaning of the tag Avance de obra = avance 70% ?

Please use also the mix cased writing of name value.
redd (2022-06-05 07:37:13+00:00): This Changeset is spanning over several countries for only a few changes. Please solit them up in future and make smaller geographical changesets. This is spamming the history page of OpenStreetMap
ivanbranco (2022-06-05 09:44:14+00:00): Hi redd,

this is a proxy user, I doubt the original user will ever read your comment.
redd (2022-06-05 12:11:43+00:00): Hi ivanbranco, 
thanks for your comment. This is clear. I doubt that these changes from Europe to India were made by a single user. Therefore whoever is responsible for user "wheelmap_visitor" should please respond soon. Otherwise I would suggest to ban this user until he proofs to commit smaller changesets in future.
Thanks,
redd
holgerd (2022-06-09 19:15:01+00:00): Hi, I’m the co-founder of Wheelmap and responsible for this. Firstly, on behalf of the whole Wheelmap project: Our apologies, we strive to be good OSM community members!

We are aware that large changesets are a problem and working on fixing it. Please find our plans and the status here: https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/329

The reason we did not reply earlier is, that I made one embarrassing mistake: The “wheelmap_visitor” user profile had an outdated e-mail address, so I did not get notifications and I did not notice this. I fixed it now and made sure all changeset comments in the future will be answered by me or our community management team.
redd (2022-06-10 20:39:15+00:00): thanks for the response! hopefully you can fix this issue soon!
lololailo (2022-06-12 08:45:23+00:00): Hi, Why do you edit the water area like a dam?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121865817
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
woodpeck (2022-06-06 11:45:11+00:00): Dear Nordpfeil, this mass "correction" of "syntax errors" violated our automated editing guidelines. The next time you stumble over a five-digit number of nodes that are buggy, please do not blindly "fix" them but seek discussion first. In this particular case, it turns out that the nodes stem from a bad import and need to be removed anyway. Your "fixing" only makes the removal harder.
woodpeck (2022-06-06 12:48:42+00:00): Not only did you uselessly edit tens of thousands of objects - it appears that the "fix" you performed was changing "NAME" into "name", while leaving a dozen similarly useless tags untouched!
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
gscscnd (2022-06-02 19:49:25+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że tracktype=grade1 na <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169171473> i <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334186925> jest trochę zbyt optymistyczne. Zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype>. Moim zdaniem, chociaż dłuższy czas już tym odcinkiem nie jechałem, bardziej by pasowało tracktype=grade2.
irik (2022-06-02 21:18:30+00:00): Masz rację, bardziej pasuje g2, dzięki za czujność. ;)
irik (2022-06-02 21:18:52+00:00): Poprawione.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
BCNorwich (2022-06-04 08:01:58+00:00): Hi, Fiction name removed and tweaked path lines. Joined the gate to the path as a proper barrier to the highway.

Regards Bernard.
senseal (2022-06-04 08:11:20+00:00): Thanks 
I have not been to this area yet and I was just going if the ordinances survey maps.
ivanbranco (2022-11-07 23:11:22+00:00): Hi benoitdd,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9791185325/

what kind of place is this one? there's only the tag name
benoitdd (2022-11-08 09:59:20+00:00): Hi Ivan. thanks for the tip. I've done the correction.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
gusfak (2022-06-05 21:40:03+00:00): Have you notice how the angles between buildings are are slightly skewed?
gusfak (2022-06-05 21:40:43+00:00): Sorry for the typos:
Have you noticed how the angles between buildings are all slightly skewed?
Dimitar155 (2022-06-06 04:50:18+00:00): Using Bing imagery they look mostly fine. They may be a few degrees off but I can't be so precise in their rotation in iD (nor I can check what's the difference in the angles).
gusfak (2022-06-08 21:59:32+00:00): Why don't map good buildings from hand with JOSM?
Dimitar155 (2022-06-09 05:15:49+00:00): I've used it before for mapping buildings and I didn't like it. For one, it's interface is terrible. There are far too many menus which take a lot of time from me to find what is where, same thing for the tools. The shortcuts are a nightmare for remembering since they are different from iD's. JOSM is also a lot slower to start up and hogs at least a gigabyte of memory on my machine.
Mapistopheles (2022-06-24 21:29:12+00:00): Hello! While I was editing in Montenegro, I found a road  you created (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066242909). The road is currently disconnected and I am unable to verify it exists. Is this a road that is under construction? Can you point me to the project you’re referencing? Thank you very much!
borop (2022-06-24 21:42:27+00:00): Sorry but,
"Changeset: 121867328
Road in project"
This is need for future reconstruction/upgrade of existing road.
So, no connection with any existing road.
Mapistopheles (2022-06-24 22:16:39+00:00): Thank you for your fast reply!
Do you mean that this is proposed construction for the existing road? If that is the case, the road should have a proposed tag. Here are OSM's guidelines for proposed roads: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed. This tag should be used when roads are still in the planning phase and construction hasn't yet started.
If this road is proposed, it would be tagged with highway=proposed and proposed=secondary.
wkdgs (2022-06-03 11:48:41+00:00): Hi,

für die kleinen Gebädue in einem Kleingartenverein gibt es einen eigenen Tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dallotment_house
wkdgs (2022-06-03 11:48:48+00:00): Hi,

für die kleinen Gebädue in einem Kleingartenverein gibt es einen eigenen Tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dallotment_house
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121867341
wkdgs (2022-06-03 11:49:08+00:00): Hi,

für die kleinen Gebädue in einem Kleingartenverein gibt es einen eigenen Tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dallotment_house
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121867341
eggie (2022-06-02 21:19:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback : amenity=drinking_water geeft wel een symbool op de kaart.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2022-06-10 15:51:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122217199 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6055].
Msiipola (2022-06-03 09:26:44+00:00): Hej! Positionen på denna byggnad är fel. Det verkar som satellitbakgrunden inte är positionskalibrerad. Därför är byggande ca 5 fel.
Abbe98 (2022-06-03 09:30:08+00:00): Möjligt, åtta år sedan de ritades...
Msiipola (2022-06-03 09:59:05+00:00): Ok, jag missade att det var enbart taggarna som hade uppdaterats, och inte hela byggnaden. 
Ser dock att även intilliggande byggnader är felplacerade.
Jag justerar dem.
Abbe98 (2022-06-03 10:31:27+00:00): Fantastiskt tack!
Noen (2022-06-03 12:33:53+00:00): Du mente kanskje å kartlegge at det ikke er lov å kjøre inn på området?
Da kan du bruke motor_vehicle=no.
Kommentarer av typen «Private property» er lite opplysende.
Ryccardo (2024-03-02 16:27:02+00:00): Hi, this is just to let you know I have reverted this changeset because the store is called Brico Io, and you had selected (probably accidentally) a preset for a completely different company :)
eggie (2022-06-03 06:58:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
VictorIE (2022-06-03 13:21:57+00:00): Hi, can you review this way. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80029317 It looks like some of it should be sidewalk
juminet (2022-06-03 06:44:28+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM!

Merci pour vos premières contributions très complètes! Mais attention, il ne faut pas décrire les objets dans le nom de ces objets. Par exemple, lorsque vous dessinez une maison, il suffit de choisir le type d'élément sur "Maison", et il n'est pas correct d'ajouter le nom "maison" ou "villa". Le nom est en effet indiqué dans le cas où le batiment a un nom usuel (par ex. "Maison Jacquemotte"). Cela vaut également pour les autres objets: étang, patûres, sentier, etc. En fait, le nom n'est pas toujours utile: cela dépend de l'objet. Il est toujours nécessaire pour une rue: toutes les rues en zone résidentielles ont un nom (ex: Chemin de Wavre) mais tous les sentiers n'en ont pas.  

Aussi, essayer de dessiner les objets plus précisément, cette ferme par ex. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066258501#map=19/50.64080/4.52384 est plus grande qu'elle n'apparait sur l'image aérienne.

Bonne continuation, et n'hésitez pas à demandez des conseils auprès de la communauté!

Happy mapping, 

juminet
bxl-forever (2022-06-19 13:49:18+00:00): Fixed by changeset 122580348
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122580348
JeroenvanderGun (2022-06-02 21:55:53+00:00): Wikipagina aangemaakt:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:network%3DNL:binnenstedelijke_ring
jcr83 (2022-12-11 21:04:05+00:00): Hi, you created a footway named "vestiges". Strange name for a path! It is generally used for archeological sites. But why "access=no" ? Is path access forbidden by a board? And why a footway instead of a path?
user_5359 (2022-06-03 17:27:33+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12509515. What is the meaning of the tag name:miskitu = River Wangki. miskitu is a defined language code.
NicaTopo (2022-06-03 22:22:26+00:00): Hi, I was trying to add the indigenous name of this river. Miskitu is a language spoken in this area -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miskito_people
and I didn't find a language abbreviation for it.
user_5359 (2022-06-04 03:19:40+00:00): Following the named link, I found the value
ISO 639-3    =     miq
(See source link 35,36). Is this a wrong value?
NicaTopo (2022-06-10 13:54:56+00:00): Hey, that's really cool! I wasn't aware of that. So I can use <name:miq=River Wanki> using the code from https://iso639-3.sil.org/code/miq?
user_5359 (2022-06-12 15:59:41+00:00): Yes, this is my understanding.
NicaTopo (2022-06-18 20:03:00+00:00): Cool, thanks!
Carto'Cité (2022-12-09 12:05:44+00:00): Bonjour divaddivag,
J'ai remarqué que tu avais mis certains chemins tels que ceux-ci en non cyclables. Est-ce que tu peux me confirmer ? Vus d'ici, ils ressemblent à des path sans interdiction évidente.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808572227
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808572228
Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie