piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AJoNee (2015-08-15 23:26:37+00:00): Tippfehler bei wateway -> waterway. Bitte selber korrigieren, ich bekomme das leider  gerade mit ID und Level 0 nicht hin.
Supaplex (2015-08-11 14:32:34+00:00): 這是拆除了還是？
Minh Nguyen (2021-06-19 10:03:17+00:00): Changeset 106625514 changes the speed limits back to mph, for consistency with the signs posted along the tracks. I’m unaware of any light rail system in the U.S. that posts speed limits in km/h.
stevea (2021-06-19 23:49:29+00:00): That's fine, Minh.  This was an "old-fashioned" way I used to do things (while trying to adhere to OSM's international status and being "more metric") rather than the "entrenched by inertia" (and hundreds of years of practice) of US railroads being firmly entrenched with SAE (non-metric) units.
maniamall (2015-08-11 06:50:15+00:00): nice
Bootprint (2016-03-04 16:09:23+00:00): I've created a relation for Tom Thomson Trail with the trail sections you've added. if you know of any other roads in the trail please add them to the relation.
Anand Veeraswamy (2015-11-09 10:47:35+00:00): I have a question regarding the two following two ways you have created - 365033996 (Ernst & Young) and 183241873 (European Medicines Agency). They are physically the same building and so ideally there should be only one way. But I understand you have modelled them as two separate ways because there are two businesses here and they have different addresses. Is there a better way to represent them as one single way and add both addresses to the same way?
eastender (2015-11-09 19:30:08+00:00): That’s a good question. At the ground floor level, each of the two tenants has their own entrance and lobby area. So there is some justification in mapping the building as two separate sub-buildings. However, I don’t know whether the vertical split between the tenants continues through all of the building’s floors. I can see that it would be better to map the building as one single way. I think that might be possible if the building was mapped as one single way with two entrances. It would then be possible to tag the two entrances with the respective addresses of the tenants. I will give that a try when I get around to my next OSM update.
Allroads (2017-02-23 17:43:27+00:00): Waarom maak je van een gebouw een multipolygon met 1 member en verplaats de aanwezige tags?

Wat is fout bij de vorige situatie?
user_5359 (2015-08-11 19:34:53+00:00): Hallo PeKni, den Scherz kann ich mir nicht verkneifen: Aus den Ortsteil Garten"hütte" direkt ein ganzes Gebäude zu machen, naja.

Okay, der Witz ist flach. Ich korrigiere mal und melde mich per Mail.

MfG Georg V.
Владимир К (2015-10-10 09:51:24+00:00): вэй 365035650 действительно pedestrian или это просто дорожка в парке?
bbmiller (2015-08-17 20:05:21+00:00): In the satellite view there doesn't appear to be a railroad crossing at this intersection.
Chetan_Gowda (2015-08-18 05:07:45+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. It looks like abandoned railway. As there was railway line, I added the crossings. Now I deleted the crossings
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:18:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072372 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
schadow1 (2015-08-11 09:47:18+00:00): Hello d1754. Admin level 5 which you are currently adding on the town boundaries as per our standard is used for Sangguniang Panlalawigan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyte_Provincial_Board
While Admin Level 6 is used for town boundaries which you are currently adding on the lines.
For details on our mapping conventions, please see here.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions#Administrative_boundaries
schadow1 (2015-08-11 09:56:44+00:00): Here is an example for Admin Level 5 Sangguniang Panlalawigan Leyte 1st District which comprises Alangalang, Santa Fe, Tanauan, Palo and Tolosa
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5428241
harmor (2016-03-29 12:34:58+00:00): Der Dativ ist dem Genitiv sein Tod 

Der Genitiv und Rechtsschreibreformen haben nichts mit alten Namen zu tun, und Wikipedia ist auch fehlerhaft.
Namen, die auf ...thal enden, werden auch nicht in ...tal umbenannt, und die Stengelstraße auch nicht in Stängelstraße, und Spiesermühle wäre auch falsch.
glglgl (2016-04-04 21:09:55+00:00): Ich habe von Rechtschreibreformen nichts gesagt, und dass alte Namen erhalten bleiben ist mir auch bekannt.

Allerdings ist Spiesermühle eben nicht falsch, denn die dort stehenden Ortsschilder tragen definitiv genau diese Beschriftung.

Wohingegen es mich bei dem Bach tatsächlich wundert, in mehreren Online-Karten "Spiesener Mühlbach zu lesen", aber dann ist es wohl so. I stand corrected :-)
BeKri (2015-08-11 14:01:12+00:00): Hallo Herrrschaften von Mentz DatenVermurkser.
Das ihr beständig an allem rummodelt und der eine von Euch nicht weiss, was der andere macht, unschön aber so seid ihr halt.
Aber warum die Freitreppen jetzt an die Unterführung angeschlossen werden ist mir ein völliges Rätsel ! Wie kommt Ihr zu dieser Kenntniss ?
Supaplex (2015-08-11 13:16:02+00:00): 有開新的店面還是閒置呢？
Doug Peng (2015-08-11 16:00:16+00:00): 倒了, 整個店面都拆掉了
Kakaner (2015-08-11 09:35:16+00:00): Magst du diesen Irrtum nicht im OSM-Forum users: Germany melden?
porfiriopaiz (2015-08-11 08:42:49+00:00): Estaré añadiendo algunas paradas de buses que hacen faltas, en su mayoría son paradas no oficiales. Algunas paradas que están en la traza no son paradas "populares" sino ocasionales.

Una vez que estén añadidas las paradas y sus puntos de referencias, procederé a añadirlas a la relación. Cualquier duda no duden en contactarme a porfiriopaiz@gmail.com
Supaplex (2015-08-11 14:01:59+00:00): 店家被加到路中間了，應該在某一側吧？
Sergiy Kozyr (2015-08-11 09:06:14+00:00): Отрисовал детали по снимкам Bing
bigbug21 (2015-08-23 08:56:29+00:00): Hallo Greggy22,
vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag. Die Sperrung der St 2239 ist bereits mit "access=no" eindeutig getaggt. Es ist nicht notwendig, den Namen der Straße zu verändern. Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer

Viele Grüße und happy mapping!
Peter
Prof Müller J (2018-04-10 18:08:05+00:00): the borders of indicated landuse around Mbengwi are not matching well with satellite information. Could it be deleted?
mdomnita (2018-04-10 19:23:00+00:00): Hello,
The borders were extracted from Landsat images about five years ago, probably there are differences now. They can be deleted but I don't know exactly which borders you are talking about. If you cannot delete them I will take a look.
Matei
Prof Müller J (2018-04-10 19:57:02+00:00): Dear Matei,
thank you for prompt response. I am mapping here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=N5.98574%20E9.98481#map=15/5.9857/9.9848

I will only delete disturbing forest borders in the viciniy
Kind regards,
Joachim
luschi (2015-08-13 21:38:04+00:00): Bitte nicht alles mit Namen versehen.
vichada (2015-08-11 10:31:28+00:00): Sorry wrong source tag: Of course it should be only:  adjusted Bing imagery
cufarulcopiilor (2015-08-11 10:37:29+00:00): great
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 11:58:15+00:00): Hello!

You used
office=graphic_designer
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3691145140/history

Have you maybe meant
office=graphic_design
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
escada (2024-01-30 13:10:08+00:00): It was probably a type.  I fixed it. Thanks for letting me know.

regards
eric_ (2015-08-28 15:04:15+00:00): Named Murrayfield Stadium (relation) changed the rendering of the stadium. Now it appears as a normal building (we can't see anymore the pitch -- that's why the name was attached to the outer way and not to the relation).
Do you mind if I update the relation to remove the name for now and to add a note instead to indicate the name? Thanks
Cameron Wright (2015-08-31 10:37:47+00:00): Sounds good to me
eric_ (2015-08-31 11:16:44+00:00): Thanks for your answer. drnoble already improved it.
ohai (2015-08-11 11:03:17+00:00): Added recently constructed dam/reservoir.
ohai (2015-08-11 11:51:45+00:00): Comment correction; should read "Okuni-rindo Forest Road entrance off Highway 58."
Hjart (2015-08-20 18:01:09+00:00): Please note that  roads & paths need to be properly connected to other roads & paths (see pkt 5 in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1)
Rui Oliveira (2015-08-11 14:31:09+00:00): A5 tem troço desligado 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23837817#map=18/38.72575/-9.41133
Hjart (2015-08-15 14:02:37+00:00): Is this a signed route? Please note that no highway=* should overlap other highway=*. In case it's a signed route it's recommended that a route relation is used. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routes
Virgile1994 (2015-09-02 10:46:23+00:00): Sympa comme nom !
Gschaftlhuaba (2016-06-03 18:46:36+00:00): Concerning the lighthouse in Monemvasia: Is there a special reason, why all the seamark metadata is added to a separate point in OSM instead of the building polygon itself plus a man_made=lighthouse tag? Secondly do you have any information whether the disused=yes is correct? Probably one should also remove the duplicate beacon point?
malcolmh (2016-06-03 19:29:57+00:00): If the light is located on the building, then it is a good idea to copy the node tags onto the building polygon & delete the node. If the beacon is a duplicate then delete it. I don't know whether the buildings are disused - try asking the original mapper.
Gschaftlhuaba (2016-06-04 04:31:25+00:00): OK, thanks. I put a comment in the other changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/7850338
Stereo (2015-08-11 16:07:54+00:00): Hallo! Wieso benannt? Es ist doch schon vending=cigarettes drin, und die Automaten heissen ja nicht alle Zigarettenautomat. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
p1230 (2015-09-12 16:47:36+00:00): Hi, habe deine Nachricht erst jetzt gesehen, sorry. Automaten für den Zigarettenverkauf werden doch Zigarettenautomaten genannt, daher halte ich es für richtig, sie auch so in OSM zu "taufen". Der Grund, warum ich sie aktiv so benenne ist, dass man in OSM-Anwendungen besser danach suchen kann. Abgesehen von dieser eigentlichen Intention halte ich die Bennenung aber wie gesagt für richtig. Ich kann meinerseits eher die Benennung "Hall Tabakwaren" o.ä. nicht nachvollziehen, weil es nicht der Name des Objektes ist.
Stereo (2015-09-13 22:09:30+00:00): Ich würde sagen, dass die nicht so heissen, so wie eine Telefonzelle eine Telefonzelle ist aber nicht Telefonzelle heisst. Konntest du https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name lesen?
Stereo (2015-09-13 22:11:54+00:00): Hall Tabakwaren wäre in deinem Fall der operator=*, und die Zigarettenautomate so zu taggen um sie in deiner Anwendung besser zu finden ist eigentlich tagging for the renderer, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
maraf24 (2015-08-11 15:21:50+00:00): Ok, ale nazwa ulicy powinna zaczynać się wielką literą.
GerdP (2015-10-16 14:24:31+00:00): please review:
way 344977479 has invalid tag
highway=road;residential
and also two names:
name=Rue Jean Pascal;Rue Blaise Pascal
Crillion-Le-Brave (2015-08-11 17:03:33+00:00): Changeset comment should read "Add and fix details to Crillion-Le-Brave, Vaucluse, France"
SomeoneElse (2015-08-11 16:42:22+00:00): Is the lack of alignment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365134959#map=19/4.45603/10.52479 deliberate?  It looks similar to my kitchen floor after the cowboy builders have been at it.  Also, what does "yes" mean as a changeset comment?
maraf24 (2015-08-11 21:06:42+00:00): I consider deleting footways without substituting for them with equivalent tagging, namely sidewalk=*, as vandalism.
Seat Ibiza (2015-08-13 16:05:08+00:00): I was not aware of the fact that a sidewalk needs to be tagged separately. Accusing a user of vandalism is in my opinion rude.
Владимир К (2015-12-02 08:55:19+00:00): Извините, но что за фигня? Какие к черту имена тропинок? Какие к черту имена калиток с указанием времени открытия?
Владимир К (2015-12-02 09:02:10+00:00): А здесь, на тротуарах, где вы пометили bicycle=yes, действительно есть специальные велодорожки? Если нет, то bicycle=yes здесь не нужен
Dilon Pait (2015-12-04 22:02:50+00:00): Имена тропинок я не указывал. Имена калиток не указывал. А время открытия в теге Description . Для кого тогда он предназначен? Надо известить людей, что они не всегда открыты, чтоб они лбом не бились. Если не нравится-снесите. Остальные теги исправил.
maciek-szn (2015-08-11 18:29:00+00:00): Popraw tagowanie. Jest "sorce:maxspeed" zamiast "source:maxspeed".
d3mol3k (2015-08-11 18:39:35+00:00): UPS poprawiłem w drugim przypadku także. I pytanko do skrzyżowania - jego przebiegu - w Nowym Warpnie z droga na Podgrodzie. W rzeczywistości wygląda tak https://goo.gl/maps/30pxY i nie wiem czy dorysowywać brakującą część czy zostawić tak jak jest na mapie?
maciek-szn (2015-08-11 19:55:01+00:00): Dorysuj ten brakujący kawałek.
d3mol3k (2015-08-11 20:19:44+00:00): Dorysowałem opisałem i dodałem zakaz skrętu w lewo w miejscu gdzie droga z Podgrodzia łączyła się z Wojska Polskiego (dk115) na starym węźle - tu mi też program "nakazał" podział tej drogi w węźle - nie wiem czy to dobrze się zrobiło :(.
maciek-szn (2015-08-11 21:28:35+00:00): Tak, jest prawidłowo. Bez podziału nie da się zrobić restrykcji skrętu. Tu możesz podejrzeć istniejące restrykcje: http://map.comlu.com/
Jacek Placek (2016-03-16 14:19:53+00:00): Where have you found name of the road :) ?
RichRico (2016-07-22 19:22:53+00:00): Hi Jacek Placek
The road was named by "JacekR"
garypl (2015-08-11 18:13:49+00:00): Comment should have said "Add permissive path".
Haris IRM-ED (2022-12-05 04:58:02+00:00): Hi, JoeG.
Your edit looks awesome, but I need to inform that i found this highway https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/365160500 is not existed in any imagery,
So i have to delete it.

Thank you for your understanding,
Happy Mapping
JeSe-MX (2015-08-13 01:10:49+00:00): Para hacer "rutas", lo mejor es hacer "relaciones de vías", para no afectar con vías fantasma al mapa.
Atzimba (2015-08-13 18:02:31+00:00): Ruta a CU. 
Segura y buena.
IdealChain (2016-02-21 13:00:26+00:00): Rankweil?! Da ist etwas schiefgegangen...
SomeoneElse (2015-08-12 13:56:24+00:00): Thanks for tidying here.  Did you get a chance to see whether the doubling-back footpath at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.20930/-1.07179 could possibly make sense?  Also is the area of the woodland at the west correct - it doesn't quite match the imagery (but the GPS traces suggest that the imagery might be offset, and there are no long east-west traces here to confirm)?
SomeoneElse (2015-08-13 00:43:00+00:00): Hi - just for info, I got a chance to check the area tonight.  I've fixed some of the stuff already (the doubling-back footpath and the designations) and will add more details (fences etc.) when I upload and map my GPS traces.
flohoff (2015-08-12 16:43:39+00:00): Hi,

in diesem changeset hast du oberflächen nachgetragen - Finde ich super. Ich meine aber das surface=paved nur "befestigt" ist ohne das genauer zu spezifizieren. Wenn du gepflastert meinst mit den normalen betonpflaster dann ist das surface=paving_stones oder so.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

Flo
ChristianLegeland (2015-08-12 19:01:42+00:00): Hallo Flo, 
nach meiner Radtour durch den Harz will ich vor allem dort einige Oberflächen berichtigen. Insofern ist dies hier mehr eine Fingerübung. 
1. Auf dem Brockweg (K3) sind die Radwege links und rechts eingetragen, allerdings 
a. auf opencyclemap nur bis zum Fussweg aus dem Aldehusweg sichtbar. 
b. auf openstreetmap sind die Radwege nicht zu sehen. 
--> Was ist "besser" oder üblich? Einzelne Radwege oder Radwege an die Stassen zu koppeln? 

2. Oberfläche: Betonpflaster also *=paving_stones. 
Gibt es eine Hierarchie? 
- paved
- - asphalt
- - cobblestones
- - paving stone 
- - concrete .....
- unpaved 
- - sand 
- - fine gravel 
- - gravel 
- - .... 
Dann wäre das einfacher.. 
Kann man eigentlich zwei surfaces angeben? 
surface:paved
surface: asphalt

Danke udn Gruss 
Christian
flohoff (2015-08-13 17:11:51+00:00): Also ich mache das so das wenn es nur Schutzstreifen sind oder die Radwege quasi direkt neben der Straße liegen das ich typishcerweise eher mit cycleway=track an die Straße bastel. Wenn das nicht immer parallel zur Fahrbahn läuft dann trage ich seperat ein. Siehe Neuenkirchener Straße - Da ist ja schonmal die Bushaltestelle vor dem Finanzamt zwischen Radweg und Fahrbahn. Aber das nehme ich nicht so genau. Das was passt und sich besser pflegen lässt. Nicht irgendein Schema mit der Brechstange durchhalten auch wenn das im Pflegedesaster endet.

Es kann ja nur eine oberfläche geben. paved ist - "Unspezifiziert befestigt" - "paving_stones" wäre dann eine genauerere spezifikation.

Ich finde surface=paved halt so nichtssagend. 99% der Fuß-/Radwege sind ja irgendwie paved in Deutschland. Aber wie? Ist das Asphalt das für ein Rennrad taugt oder quält man sich mit den 11mm Reifen über die "Wassergebundene Wegedecke" aka "compacted".

Deshalb meinte ich - wenn man denn schon da war und es sich angesehen hat dann gleich richtig eintragen. paved/unpaved sind so historische unterscheidungen von 2006/7 die dann irgendwann durch genauere spezifikationen ersetzt wurden.

Flo
Flo
SomeoneElse (2015-08-17 00:29:18+00:00): Can you please explain what you were trying to achieve by this edit?  What was the problem with the data as it was before, and what you believe you have fixed?  Also, similarly, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33276302 .
Geography Canada (2016-07-25 13:57:09+00:00): It was because Wales, England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are officially the countries of the UK.
pantufla (2020-05-27 14:23:20+00:00): Hola Alberto, Cayo Pelón pareciera no existir si ves las imágenes satelitales. Lo borramos?
literan (2015-08-12 12:28:45+00:00): объекты без смысловой нагрузки, с одним тегом name (т.е. именем собственным) подлежат удалению
Peter Mead (2015-08-12 08:35:30+00:00): Thank you for improving this road.  However, it would have been better to change the existing way rather than delete it and add a new one.  We've now essentially lost the history of it.

Also, your changeset says "aligning roads" but you haven't changed the alignment.
karitotp (2015-08-12 21:11:45+00:00): Peter Mead, I've been working on impossible angle roads, I did not remove the road, 
I have splitted this road , it should  generate other new road.
I reverted my change (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33300928) and left a note(https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/413223) to someone 
from the neighborhood could check it if really exist this impossible angles on road.
and about my comments, I will add more details for the next.

Thanks
EdLoach (2015-08-13 08:10:44+00:00): With the reversion and the comments on the note it is clearer what was done. I've edited it, perhaps replicating what was done before.
Peter Mead (2015-08-13 08:40:30+00:00): karitotp, I didn't say you removed the road I said you removed the way.  A revert wasn't really necessary as I was just letting you know about something that you may not have realised and that you might wish to do slightly differently in the future.
literan (2015-08-12 12:28:05+00:00): это вообще что имелось в виду? если там площадка для BMX - то теги leisure=pitch
sport=bmx

если просто велосипедисты тусят, то это не следует вносить в базу
literan (2015-08-12 12:29:59+00:00): беседка уже есть, не надо дублировать объекты! удаляю.
pauliusz (2015-08-20 09:05:02+00:00): Na Lidl aleksote dar tik planuojamas... Jokie statybų darbai dar net neprasidėje... Pataisiau, kad atrodytu labiau į statybas panašu, nes dabar atrodė, kad jau stovi.
ArmAvr (2015-08-11 19:45:41+00:00): fixed streets and buildings
pnorman (2015-08-14 19:59:22+00:00): Imports in OSM need to follow the imprt guidelines at wiki.osm.org/Import/Guidelines, which include discussing the proposed import on talk-ca@ and imports@, which you don't seem to have done here.

Did you get special permission from the City of Ottawa? The data license on their site aren't open or compatible with OSM.
LogicalViolinist (2015-08-14 20:11:52+00:00): I did get permission, why?
pnorman (2015-08-14 20:14:20+00:00): Could you document the import on the wiki and post the permission there? Also, you need to bring up the import on the lists, even though this is after the fact.

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
LogicalViolinist (2015-08-14 20:34:09+00:00): Ill have to do so on monday as I will not be at a computer until then
pnorman (2015-09-19 03:25:55+00:00): Did you get a chance to document the permission?
LogicalViolinist (2015-09-19 11:09:07+00:00): Have you even checked the wiki?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Ontario:Ottawa/Import/Permission
Also Ottawa is changing license of the Data to the Open Canada License 2.0 before december. so for the rest of the data I'm waiting for the license change before moving forward
literan (2015-08-12 13:03:02+00:00): не надо в name все подряд ставить! этот тег - для имен собственных
Richard (2015-08-17 12:23:37+00:00): Hi,

Great to see the mapping of the Norwich cycle network.

"Orange Pedalway" etc. aren't really refs. Refs are short numeric/alphabetic references used on signs. "Orange Pedalway" is a name.

Many routers/renderers use 'shields' to show refs, and a ref with 15 characters is too big for any known shield - so the effect is probably that it'll not show up on most maps. (OpenCycleMap is a rare exception!)

As far as I can tell, the signage actually just shows the colours - e.g. http://www.norwich.gov.uk/TransportAndStreets/Transport/Cycling/PublishingImages/WayfinderSticker.png .

I'd suggest that it therefore would be better to revert to the simple "ref=Orange" which is a more accurate reflection of what's on the sign, and won't break so many clients.

cheers
Richard
Pink Duck (2015-08-17 17:08:01+00:00): They are more of a name than ref, agreed. I changed it since routing agents (e.g. OsmAnd) were saying "turn right on to Orange", which made no sense when spoken. The colours are already stored against the route relations. I shall probably remove the ref altogether and put the pedalway names into the name tag, the existing origin/destination into a note tag.
Richard (2015-08-17 17:23:01+00:00): That's great - thank you!
Pink Duck (2015-08-17 18:51:58+00:00): It would also be great if the local cycle network with HTML colour tag could be rendered in the Cycle Map render :)
elgolfo (2015-09-17 20:21:41+00:00): Hi, du hast in diesem und in weiteren Changesets viele neue Pfade mit einer Breite von 2m und mehr angegeben. Gibt es einen Grund, dass sie nicht als Track sondern als Path gemappt sind?
twellhausen (2015-09-17 21:59:01+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Nachfrage! Ich bin neu bei OSM und habe versucht, mich an ähnlichen Wegen in der Umgebung zu orientieren bzw. an den Beschreibungen auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Path_examples. Demnach kam mir Path für diese überwiegend kleinen Wanderwege am besten vor. Die angebenen Breiten entsprechen den wirklichen Breiten vor Ort (2-4m). Ich lasse mich aber gerne eines besseren belehren... :-)
neuhausr (2015-09-02 16:57:56+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap! However, it's very unusual to put the name of current owner/occupant of a private residence into OSM. Also, some of your tagging (such as a house as a place of worship) seem questionable. Take a look, and reply back if you have questions.
andrzej_aa (2015-08-12 10:21:16+00:00): Po tej zmianie las https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5428055 przestał się renderować. Proszę o dokładną weryfikację zmian.
mds878 (2015-08-24 13:48:42+00:00): 操作ミスによる削除のようなので、一旦この修正は全てリバートさせていただきました
rickmastfan67 (2015-08-12 01:21:33+00:00): If you have any questions about classifications, don't hesitate to ask me if you're not sure.  I'm pretty good at this stuff. ;)