piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-20 15:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:41:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:43:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
user_1470980 (2018-07-05 11:16:04+00:00): Hallo elkueb,
Dir ist schon bewusst dass du mit einer solchen source Angabe, OpenStreetMap kompromittiert.
Abgesehen davon glaube ich Dir nicht dass es sich hier tatsächlich um esri oder Stadt Wien Daten handelt.
Ich bitte Dich daher geschützte Inhalte umgehend zu entfernen. Oder Deine Source Angabe zu ändern.
Grüße Johann
elkueb (2018-07-05 19:55:48+00:00): > Dir ist schon bewusst dass du mit einer solchen source Angabe, OpenStreetMap kompromittierst.

Ah, und mit welchem Teil genau von meiner source-Angabe?

> Abgesehen davon glaube ich Dir nicht dass es sich hier tatsächlich um esri oder Stadt Wien Daten handelt

Bei welchen Daten hast du denn konkret Bedenken, dass sie nicht aus einer im changeset angegebenen source kommen?
Palolo (2018-07-04 03:28:15+00:00): @1907 it doesn't appear that you are tracing features found on the ground.  OSM is not a game, please remove your vandalism.
user_5359 (2018-07-13 15:19:52+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Was ist denn bitte die Bierothek? Eine Kneipe?
Bierothek (2018-07-13 15:31:49+00:00): Nein, eine Bierothek ist ein Bierfachgeschäft. Eine Vinothek für Bier sozusagen. Siehe: https://bierothek.de/
user_5359 (2018-07-13 15:36:21+00:00): Okay, habe Deinen Eintrag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5758872557 mal entsprechend ergänzt.
dieterdreist (2020-12-12 16:28:24+00:00): Changeset genannt in Diskussion https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71409
VitalieS (2020-10-16 22:31:18+00:00): Bună,
Mirella de pe bd. Ștefan cel Mare și Sfânt, 62 mai activează?
DemoLogin (2018-11-13 23:21:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Для "Пятёрочки" вы не указали shop=convenience.
Поправьте пожалуйста.
ralley (2018-06-18 20:09:56+00:00): The residential road you added seems to be a duplicate of the existing way #7633408 (Mount Carmel Place)
GreenApple11 (2018-08-29 18:19:16+00:00): Hey ralley, sorry for making this mistake. This has been fixed by another operator, but I will be more careful in the future. Please feel free to review my other changes and give any feedback. Thanks, GreenApple11
Кірыла (2018-08-03 15:17:31+00:00): Здраствуйте! Есть ли источник, который подтверждает, что нарисованный с Аранской на Индустриальную съезд действительно существует?
paleshukgeo (2018-08-03 17:05:25+00:00): https://yandex.by/maps/157/minsk/?ll=27.573571%2C53.886604&z=19&l=stv%2Csta&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=27.573294%2C53.886883&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=278.320965%2C-5.066257&panorama%5Bspan%5D=120.000000%2C63.277850
Кірыла (2018-08-03 19:31:24+00:00): По Вашему же фото это не съезд на индустриальную улицу, а место для разворота.
paleshukgeo (2018-08-04 06:25:26+00:00): А я и не с фото чертил (это просто пруф). Я знаю, что там разрешено ездить, тк сам  езжу в том районе.
eggie (2018-06-18 18:54:00+00:00): :)  Gelukt zie ik.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:43:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:43:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:41:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:42:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:57:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
user_5359 (2018-06-25 11:17:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! I have reverted your change set because the position isn't in the middle of the street.
viloan (2018-06-18 19:09:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Владимир К (2018-08-15 06:46:18+00:00): не надо ставить на линию crossing=zebra, надо делать точки пересечения футвея и дороги. и её отмечать hw=crossing+crossing=uncontrolled для перехода без светофора
viloan (2018-06-18 19:22:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-06-18 19:23:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
micha_k (2020-09-28 08:00:26+00:00): Welchen Zweck hat das Tagging mit highway=footway bei den Eisenbahn-Bahnsteigen? Die gängingen Routingverfahren auf der Basis von OSM benutzen, zumindest heute, auch Bahnsteige für das Fußgängerrouting - dafür ist es nicht nötig. Dazu sorgt es aber dafür, dass die Bahnsteige wie Fußwege gerendert werden.
okilimu (2020-09-28 08:23:19+00:00): Hallo micha_k,
ja, heute werden die Bahnsteige und Haltesteige als fußwegtauglich mit geroutet, das war vor zwei Jahren nicht der Fall. Da waren die Steige nicht erreichbar zu Fuß, wie z.b. damals mit brouter getestet.
Heute ist das Tagging überflüssig, Du kannst sie entfernen
viele Grüße Dietmar aka okilimu
micha_k (2020-09-28 09:32:36+00:00): Hallo Dietmar, danke für die schnelle Antwort. Viele Grüße, Micha
VlIvYur (2018-06-22 11:49:18+00:00): Hello
Are you sure that farmlands were abandoned? Some of them looks as it resting for a season
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/599055977 but it was 2-9 years ago

Also current date in "source" is almost useless, because everyone knows when changeset was created. More usefull will be bing's "capture date": right click on the background - last menu item "Show tile info" and "Metadata Capture Date" in the appeared window (it's better to write in yyyy-mm-dd format)
SimonPoole (2018-06-19 06:56:13+00:00): Upps, this included a minor landuse improvement on Crete.
karsbehr (2020-05-15 16:18:36+00:00): Hallo Solarspot, weißt Du zufällig noch, aus welchem Material das Wegkreuz Knoten: 766904366 ist? Das macht einen Osmose-Fehler. LG Karsten
Solarspot (2020-05-23 20:16:54+00:00): Hi, der Kreuz ist aus Stein.
http://koelner-wegekreuze.de/Bezirk%204/Bocklemuend-Mengenich/B4,06--Obere%20Dorf-Kapp/--Obere%20Dorfstr-Kappelsweg--.html
RicoElectrico (2020-09-14 14:19:45+00:00): Cześć, spójrz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2347957 . Z góry dzięki!
aceman444 (2023-06-21 21:40:05+00:00): Sadly, wrong fix. A footway in a tunnel does not intersect the road above it.
AzureX (2018-06-18 20:44:45+00:00): James*
FredrikEdler (2018-06-19 06:40:14+00:00): Her fantes Revelneset park fra før.
Carnildo (2018-06-19 02:32:41+00:00): There's a "Depot Park" in the area already.  If you need to make it larger, drag the corners, don't draw a second copy of the park over it.
archie (2018-06-18 23:23:03+00:00): tourism=lean_to without amenity=shelter doesn't make any sense, does it?
Hjart (2019-06-20 10:01:03+00:00): tourism=lean_to would be simpler and smarter  than the amenity=shelter scheme though
archie (2019-06-20 10:51:12+00:00): Sorry can't follow you. I am not aware of the key/value combination tourism=lean_to. I do know the tagset combination amenity=shelter+shelter_type=lean_to. Cannot find tourism=lean_to on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tourism_tag_overview. Is this feature new?
archie (2019-06-20 10:56:16+00:00): Ah, I see. A rejected proposed feature (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lean_to). As we layers call ferenda as oposed to lex lata.
archie (2019-06-20 11:11:05+00:00): citation should rightly be: lex ferenda (or de lege ferenda) as oposed to lex lata (or de lege lata).
Carnildo (2018-06-19 03:11:27+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments.  A single period doesn't say anything, and is a pain to try to click on in the edit history.
Warin61 (2018-06-19 22:52:56+00:00): Unfortunately ... 
The changeset that made this error also made other errors . So this 'fix' just makes fixing the rest of the errors .. harder? 

I have reverted this changeset along with the other error causing changeset.
wambacher (2018-06-19 23:26:40+00:00): you should have malied me before the revert.

now it's your problem

walter
felipeeugenio (2018-06-18 21:55:51+00:00): Hola Estimado
Que pasó con este sector? porque lo borró?
saludos y quedo atento
jptolosa (2018-06-19 22:20:07+00:00): Hola, disculpa, pero según entiendo el tranvía turístico de Iquique se encuentra en pleno funcionamiento. Aunque funcione con muy baja frecuencia no implica etiquetarlo como "disused".
eggie (2018-06-19 06:42:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-19 06:52:58+00:00): Dag Robin,
Je gebruikt geen satellietbeelden in Nederland maar de PDOK luchtfoto 2017.
De ligging van de rails komt uit de data van Prorail en wordt onderhouden door Jeroen Wegdam. Bij ingrijpende veranderingen zou ik even contact met hem opnemen. In de historie  zie  je de oorspronkelijke mapper.
Zo'n luchtfoto kan best achterlopen bij de werkelijkheid
Verder worden parallelvoetpaden meestal niet getekend.
Wel als er een groenstrook  tussen beide "ways' ligt. 
 Een spoorwegovergang wordt getagd als level_crossing
MVG,
Eggie
JJJWegdam (2018-06-19 09:17:11+00:00): Spoorligging en baanvaksnelheden zijn inmiddels geupdate. Bedankt voor het mappen; je zat al best wel goed Robin
werner2101 (2018-12-31 18:40:54+00:00): Die Pipeline-Tags sind auch an den Grenzen von Ferndorf (Relation) angebracht worden. War das ein versehen und können die Tags wieder weg?
nebulon42 (2018-12-31 21:04:23+00:00): Ja, ein sehr blödes Versehen. Danke fürs Entdecken. Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65921739 korrigiert und die Tags entfernt.
felipeeugenio (2018-06-18 21:56:33+00:00): Hola
Hay un parque que se llama cedrón ahi?
quedo atento
saludos
eggie (2018-06-19 06:58:28+00:00): Verder is het zo dat spoorlijnen als traditie niet zomaar van de kaart mogen verdwijnen als ze als abandoned zijn getagd. Je gebied van je edits is zo groot omdat je spoorrails hebt geplakt aan de grenzen van de gemeente Assen. 
Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je edits inhouden svp.
eggie (2018-06-19 07:07:32+00:00): Er zit niets geplakt. Je heb de twee grensgebieden losgemaakt of verschoven.geen ramp op zich.  . Ik heb even onze spoorman JJJ Wegdam ingeseind of hij nog eens kijkt.
stev (2018-08-15 19:28:40+00:00): Definitely not a working farm here - used to be once, but just houses now..
ianc (2018-08-16 12:18:16+00:00): Cool - thanks. Nice to see someone else looking at the area!
muralito (2018-06-18 23:04:39+00:00): Hola Abel.

Por favor tene mas cuidado, cambiaste la Burzaco de poblacion a plaza.
Abel Flores (2018-06-19 00:12:00+00:00): donde esta el monumento a la bandera es una plaza la ma conocida de la zona
muralito (2018-06-19 02:19:18+00:00): Abel, estas errando.

La plaza es esto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29253064

Lo que vos cambiaste, ahora por segunda vez despues de que yo corrigiera tu anterior error es esto https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/198441233

Por favor, no lo vuelvas a cambiar porque lo que haces es borrar esa localidad, lo cual en vez de mejorar, la recagas.
emvee (2023-08-23 21:39:40+00:00): Hi,

We are searching for a new photo for bicycle_parking=streetpod and looking where streetpods are mapped I saw your name popping up for 8 of them in Newcastle upon Tyne partly via this changeset.

See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/finding-new-images-for-osm-wiki-help-welcomed/5423/30, we are looking for a new image with that may be freely reused.

Can you maybe provide on one more images of streetpod’s?

Greetings,

Emvee
lakedistrict (2023-08-25 23:47:48+00:00): Hi, I've found the photo I took when I surveyed these, and I'll upload it along with a couple of other examples soon. I'll let you know, either here or on the discourse thread, when done. :)
emvee (2023-09-03 14:36:26+00:00): Thanks!
emvee (2024-01-17 13:14:53+00:00): The subject came up again ;-)

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/finding-new-images-for-osm-wiki-help-welcomed/5423/42
emvee (2025-11-12 21:29:25+00:00): ping ;-)
lakedistrict (2026-01-02 23:59:49+00:00): I've uploaded a few examples and replied to the thread (eventually!) :)
topolusitania (2018-06-19 00:49:48+00:00): Esta área (Zambujal do Conde) é uma plantação de que produtos agrícolas?
luisforte (2018-06-19 11:30:34+00:00): Em nota tenho indicação de fruta. Pela foto aérea realmente não o aparenta. Passo lá ainda esta semana e corrijo ou complemento a informação.
topolusitania (2018-06-20 18:21:21+00:00): Olá. Obrigado. Achei estranho o orchard quando nas varias fotos de satélite (Bing, ESRI, etc parece uma plantação florestal. ;-)
Outra questão - tens classificado os montes alentejanos como isolated dweling. Eu tenho usado o farmyard, desenhando (ou não) os diversos edificios. Verifica por favor, por exemplo o Monte da Camoeira, onde acrescentámos essa tag, Levanto a questão para unificarmos critérios ;-)
luisforte (2018-06-20 20:29:54+00:00): Viva
Realmente parece-me um zambujal, tal como o nome indica, mudo para forest, não me vá esquecer, independentemente de passar lá em breve.
A questão dos montes dá mais luta :)
Faço a minha vida entre um monte, a caminho de Odivelas (Beja), e Évora. Consideramos "o monte" como a casa de habitação, servindo assim também para distinguir a casa do terreno circundante, seja uma horta, fazenda ou herdade ou de edifícios proximos, seja uma oficina ou um casão. Daí entender que faz sentido marcar os montes quando os identifico.
A questão não me parece chocante demais, porque também não me parece descabido generalizar o nome do monte para uma pequena area rural, mais ainda quando não sabemos identificar concretamente qual dos edifícios é o monte. Não fosse a redundância de designações e a deselegância que aparece nos mapas feios do OSM com ocorrências de repetição, diria mesmo que era indiferente.  Mais ainda, e tal como vocês pelo que percebo, fazendo eu mapas (com base no postgres) uso a clausula “… WHERE  place ='isolated_dwelling’ ”, ignorando assim a tag farmyard, não me constrange a coexistência destas duas classificações distintas. Espero que suceda o mesmo (ausência de impactos) com vocês, neste aspecto.
Passo-te a batata quente, estou totalmente de acordo na necessidade  da existência de regras de forma a uniformizar procedimentos. Até fará sentido existir só uma das designações, ou no place:farmyard ou no place:isolated_dwelling ou building:*, mas nunca em mais que um. Que te parece? (pelo menos em sql não levanta qualquer inconveniente, só uma query um pouco mais longa) :D
topolusitania (2018-06-20 21:00:31+00:00): Olá
Compara a definição das duas tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling e
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard.

Por outro lado, a palavra "Monte" quase sempre designava (falo no passado - experiência pessoal) o conjunto das construções onde habitavam o dono da herdade e ou o caseiro, as instalações onde habitavam os trabalhadores rurais - sazonais ou não e os diversos armazéns agrícolas

Dicionário Priberam

9. [Regionalismo]  Propriedade rural no Alentejo. = HERDADE
10. [Regionalismo]  Conjunto das casas de uma herdade no Alentejo, geralmente numa elevação, onde se situa a moradia e outras dependências.
Podemos continuar esta conversa na Talk-pt, onde outros colaboradores podem ajudar ;-)
luisforte (2018-06-20 23:30:12+00:00): Olá
A utilização da tag landuse=farmyard é para mim correctíssima, embora estejamos a debater um termo (monte) que tem interpretação distinta; se nestas partes do alentejo um monte é uma habitação acredito que noutros locais no alentejo ou não, ou para outras pessoas,  o conceito possa ser mais abrangente.
Definindo como farmyard dá lugar a ambiguidades; se na cidade temos edifícios residenciais, zonas comerciais (sem nome normalmente), etc, porque não devemos ter uma edifícios  dentro de uma farmyard, constituída por um monte, dois armazéns e 4 currais, etc?
Desculpa ser chato mas acho que até gosto ;)
kooshi (2018-06-18 23:25:55+00:00):  comment incorrect
added new shopping center
Abel Flores (2018-06-19 00:01:09+00:00): es una plaza ese lugar
muralito (2018-06-19 02:21:33+00:00): No, ese lugar que volviste a dejar mal es lo que representa la localidad. Estas cagando el mapa.
kooshi (2018-06-18 23:24:41+00:00): comment incorrect
added new shopping centers
user_5359 (2018-06-20 03:58:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2018-06-19 07:20:00+00:00): Hier is het gebied van je edit zo groot omdat je wegen aan de landuse=residential van Drunen hebt vastgeplakt ipv aan de wegen. Ik zal even kijken of ik die hele residential simpel kan losmaken. Het gevaar zit in het verschuiven door een andere mapper. Alles komt dan mee en dan krijg je wonderlijke effecten. 
Dit was je edit. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59960717
eggie (2018-06-19 07:23:01+00:00): Hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.68556/5.14639
eggie (2018-06-19 07:27:43+00:00): Parallelvoetpaden in principe alleen mappen als er een groenstrook tussen in dit geval het fietspad en het trottoir zit.
eggie (2018-06-19 07:30:51+00:00): landuse=residential losgemaakt
eggie (2018-06-19 07:41:29+00:00): Parallelvoetpad verwijderd. Dat routeert niet zo. De toevoerpaden aan het fietspad vastgemaakt. Ook niet één way maken wanneer je naar een andere straat gaat. dan krijg je verkeerde navigatie aanwijzingen. Dus het potlood van het papier halen. Dat heb je op meer plaatsen "fout" gedaan. Je kunt ook aangeven op de rijbaan of fietspad dat er een trottoir is, maar hier even niet doen svp, want er lopen fietsroutes en die zijn kwetsbaar. Deze niet splitsen of doorverbinden. Specialistenwerk.
eggie (2018-06-19 07:47:02+00:00): De aansluiting Jan Steenstraat Duinweg uit de knoop gehaald. Die zat nu dus ook geplakt aan die residential en was iets wonderlijks geworden.
eggie (2018-06-19 08:03:48+00:00): Niet jouw fout, maar het resultaat van dat plakken. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50897559
...een andere mapper verplaatst iets. Even als voorbeeld.
TheOutpost (2022-09-14 20:53:23+00:00): There are some strange looking orphan powerlines in this changeset. Should we delete the powerlines?