piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2022-12-06 08:23:30+00:00): Hi Sharmila1234656,
this changeset has as well created errors in the OSm database regarding overlapping ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129678450

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
canfe (2022-12-04 17:05:43+00:00): Due edifici quasi uniti. Uniscili.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129678629
NorthCrab (2022-12-03 18:49:51+00:00): Witaj, proszę nie używaj tagu name= do przekazywania informacji opisowej. Wątpię aby oficjalną nazwą tego miejsca była "kapliczka leśna" a bardziej jest to zwykły opis. Więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Nazwą jest np. nazwa sklepu, nazwa ulicy, ale nazwą nie będzie np. "drzewo" albo "droga polna".

Pozdrawiam!
Math1985 (2025-07-30 09:49:49+00:00): Hi Jejko,

It looks like in this changeset, you deleted way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159697367 which I created in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89755748

Did you delete it on purpose?
pyram (2022-12-29 12:37:10+00:00): Hallo schoka,
https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=12.89/48.54/12.00&layer=same_wikidata
zeigt, dass Du an zwei gleichnamigen Orten
( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/504457846#map=19/48.55624/12.03898 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/276061775 )
das gleiche wikidata ergänzt hast. Beim Östlichen ist das wahrscheinlich falsch (der Kollege hat dort auch das wahrscheinlich falsche "wikipedia" ergänzt.)
Magst Du das prüfen und verbessern?

Gruß
pyram
schoka (2022-12-29 16:25:08+00:00): Hi pyram, Danke für den Tipp. Das war tatsächlich verkehrt. Leider gibt es keinen Wikidata Eintrag für diesen Ort. Ich habe noch eine note hinterlassen.
Gruß
schoka
amadvance (2022-12-04 07:44:04+00:00): Ciao damr92,

Ho visto che stai aggiungendo sentieri mancanti, ottimo! 

Per quanto possibile cerca anche di mettere gli attributi sac_scale e trail_visibility.

Questi sono gli attributi principali usati dai visualizzatori per differenziare i sentieri, e aiutano molto l'utente per capire quali sono i sentieri principali e quelli secondari.

Ciao,
Andrea
dpolovinkin (2025-12-13 17:18:51+00:00): hi! are you completely sure you've mapped it correctly, taking into account, this object https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119181250/history#map=19/34.983886/33.723784 is where it is, for example?
Zenon (2025-12-15 06:20:52+00:00): Thank you for pointing out.
Since mapping this some years ago, The numbering may have changed
dpolovinkin (2025-12-18 08:58:14+00:00): I see, but numbering isn't a problem here, I'm talking about those lines starting/ending completely outside of the golf field, this doesn't change with time... :)
Patchanka (2022-12-05 18:59:25+00:00): bonjour
est-ce qu'il y a vraiment un parc à cet endroit ??
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Ça me parait bien étrange...
Bonne soirée
Supaplex (2022-12-03 15:58:15+00:00): 這是有正式名稱的，國家高速網路中心
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129679812
Supaplex (2022-12-03 15:58:07+00:00): 這是有正式名稱的，國家高速網路中心
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129679949
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-12-03 21:28:04+00:00): 这个是在修

https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/%E8%87%BA%E7%81%A3%20(Taiwan,%20Tajwan).html

里面提到的配对错误的时候看到的，comment打的时候还确实没看到底叫啥名字，只是印象里它是数据中心就先这么写方便后人了解changeset大致内容了😢
Famlam (2023-03-01 20:14:36+00:00): Ik moest een foutje van mezelf herstellen en kwam toen lit=yes op het gras tegen (weg 499498445, tag hier toegevoegd). 
Ik heb gegokt dat dat een foutje was en alleen de paden verlicht waren, niet het gehele grasland en dus deze tag weer van het gras gehaald, maar mocht het wel degelijk zijn dat het hele gras verlicht is, hoor ik het graag, dan zet ik het terug!
Langlaeufer (2023-01-20 07:47:30+00:00): Hallo CaHein,

unter name bitte nur offizielle Namen Eintragen.
Zusätze wie "Fußweg" oder Bezeichungen wie "Weg zum ..." habe da nichts verloren. Wenn diese wirklich gebräuchlich sind dann ggf in loc_name oder alt_name? siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name

Grüße
Frank aka Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129680101
CaHein (2023-01-23 10:11:52+00:00): Moin Frank,

den Namen habe ich tatsächlich auf einem Stadtplan von St.Andreasberg gefunden, der dort beim Kurzentrum erhältlich ist. Am Gesehr biegt da halt ab, während ein Fußweg geradeaus hoch geht, der zum Weg Am Gesehr oben auf der Höhe verläuft.

Habe mich sehr um die Wegenamen bemüht, konnte aber nicht immer eindeutige Antworten finden. Selbst Forstverwaltung und Nationalpark benutzten teilweise unterschiedliche Namen.

Danke für den Hinweis,
Carsten
Langlaeufer (2023-01-23 10:43:06+00:00): Hallo Carsten,

ja, bei Wegen die nicht offiziellen Plänen/Karten beschriftet sind ist dass immer etwas schwierig. Aber dort dürften wir ja dann auch nicht abschreiben. Bleiben eigentlich nur die Schilder vor Ort.

Grüße
Frank
Carlos Brys (2022-12-08 14:59:57+00:00): Se eliminó el nodo por representar información inconsistente
eisa01 (2023-12-02 13:04:13+00:00): Just a FYI, but you added already existing hotels (Almaas, Stord) in your changesets. These were already existing as buildings (not nodes)

Not sure if there are more duplicates
Jakka (2022-12-03 18:13:10+00:00): is it the footway ?
on this map use ctrl+F5 to get the new map data.
ptilougarou_belgium (2022-12-04 19:19:26+00:00): Yes. But <Ctrl><F5> does'nt modifiy anything. I always keep the old map and I don't understand why. I did some modifications before and they were applied
Jakka (2022-12-04 19:23:09+00:00): you do not see this footway at all ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266909989
ptilougarou_belgium (2022-12-07 16:36:14+00:00): The right footpath must be like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=129681680#map=20/50.28083/4.79037. It must be at the edge (//) of the main way and not on the main way. It's this modification that I cannot do
GinaroZ (2022-12-03 21:43:20+00:00): So how do you access this car park? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169504318
scianana (2022-12-04 09:23:39+00:00): There's no car park there at the moment. It's just a closed off area where people store equipment for the tram tracks work.
Harel M (2022-12-28 11:34:12+00:00): Can you please fix the image link? I don't think it is pointing to anything...
Tsur Halamish (2022-12-28 11:53:49+00:00): Done. Thanks for the update.
whb (2022-12-05 11:26:15+00:00): Gute Tag,

diese Abbiegebeschränkung halte ich so nicht für richtig:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14965380
Denn Motorräder (darüber ist zusätzlich ein Fahrrad oder ist das ein Mofa?) dürfen dort laut Zusatzschild unter dem Pfeil abbiegen.
Da die "Kleine Plöck" sowieso mit einem "motorcar=no" versehen ist, halte ich die Abbiegebeschränkung auch für entbehrlich.

Viele Grüße
whb
angys (2023-02-01 18:18:31+00:00): Is that a loop? should be two terminus? and the fee is that RM1 like MRT bus, based on my experience on 173 the main route fee are depending on the distance.
nabilersyad (2023-02-02 13:17:40+00:00): I was using the my50 pass so I didnt notice the fares. But I can remove that for now.
When I took the bus, it didn't really stop for long at the supposed second terminus at LRT Sentul. It just continued it's path back to Wira Damai. 
My understanding of two terminus routes is that there will be specific departure times from each terminus. 
What do you think?
angys (2023-02-02 14:25:05+00:00): I was using the my50 pass so I didnt notice the fares. But I can remove that for now.
--Allright, tq
When I took the bus, it didn't really stop for long at the supposed second terminus at LRT Sentul. It just continued it's path back to Wira Damai.
My understanding of two terminus routes is that there will be specific departure times from each terminus.
What do you think?
-Yaa exactly, but from Moovit is is a dual direction line, but only 15 min intervals are listed. The other similar route of 151, 173 are having 2 terminus, so I assume most of the trunk line are the same.
nabilersyad (2023-02-02 15:35:22+00:00): -Yaa exactly, but from Moovit is is a dual direction line, but only 15 min intervals are listed. The other similar route of 151, 173 are having 2 terminus, so I assume most of the trunk line are the same.
--- I checked Rapid's Pulse App and the way they present 170 is like a loop route, ie no option to change terminus. Whereas 151 and 173 has that option. This was consistent with my bus ride although Pulse's LRT stop for route 170 is a bit different than reality. I mapped that difference.
angys (2023-02-02 17:34:06+00:00): Ok, then should consider as a loop. Might need to update for Moovit also?
nabilersyad (2023-02-03 08:50:53+00:00): I'm not an editor on Moovit. But yeah would be good to update there too.

Btw I notice you just did a mass import of bus route data. You got it from here correct :https://www.data.gov.my/data/ms_MY/dataset/senarai-lokasi-stesen-bas-rapid-kuala-lumpur-kl

Some of the stops you added overlap existing bus stops. I noticed this while i was reviewing the 170 route bus stops. I'll remove the redundant new ones ok?
angys (2023-02-03 13:35:49+00:00): Yes ia lso do some duplication, the data is filtered, and actually you can use the coordinate for a more accurate bus stop location, Personally, I use the route_ref from the data to add for the bus stop, just remove U for trunk ine in most case, if there are S I think is DBKL/Smart Selangor route. The data is quite accurate for now, but I admit need to do a lot of integration with the current data. What I do is I use the new coordinate (unless it is clearly located at wrong space e.g. middle of road or shift of bus stop location, I will use the original coordinate) and use the old bus stop data. The bus reference also avaiable for most bus stop in the name, so can add at the ref site also.
nabilersyad (2023-02-04 05:24:14+00:00): Alright I agree. with your suggestions. Will merge the busstop data for routes I'm working on. 
However should we split the bus stop name into name and ref tags?
For example name=SL182 PANGSAPURI KENANGA 
should be split to
name=Pangsapuri Kenanga
ref =SL182
angys (2023-02-04 05:26:06+00:00): Yes, need to split it.
angys (2023-02-04 05:26:46+00:00): (and some Rapid KL bus stop in the system are display as smth like Spg or Apt, actually we can use Simpang or Apartment insetad of using short name in OSM.
Scout Jens (2023-01-06 09:05:05+00:00): Footway and sidewalk near Via Venezia should be corrected
Tomas Straupis (2022-12-04 08:07:48+00:00): Hello. Please do not follow incorrect "advice" by iD editor to change "outdated" tags. Reverting damage to water objects.
HubMiner (2024-04-22 19:20:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539151575

Hi, could you confirm the hours for this church - it is always open?
1998alexkane (2024-04-22 20:05:52+00:00): (Replying from my main account instead of my import account)
I didn't set this value, it looks like the value was initially set by shuui.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-12-03 17:07:46+00:00): Mentioned in https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia/13749
DBailey635 (2022-12-03 17:19:19+00:00): There is a footpath right across the field to the West of the Sulis Down estate that I don't think exists on the ground any more. Am not sure if it's a designated or permissive path, so I haven't removed it yet.
emersonveenstra (2022-12-03 21:15:23+00:00): Hi again!
Same thing here, would you mind changing "W Washington Street" to "West Washington Street"? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129684104
woodpeck (2024-06-05 15:42:18+00:00): Hallo Andreas, dieser Parkplatz, den Du in diesem Changeset von "access=permissive" auf "access=customers" umgetaggt hast, für wessen Kunden ist der denn gedacht? Jemand hat sich beim FOSSGIS beschwert, es wäre *kein* Parkplatz sondern Privatgelände. Vom Luftbild her scheint es mir ja schon zum Parken benutzt zu werden... ist es vielleicht einfach access=private statt access=customers?
Andreas Binder (2024-06-05 19:34:14+00:00): Hi Frederik, habe leider von damals keine Fotos oder weitere Notizen mehr, die zur Einstufung als Kundenparkplatz geführt hatten. Weiß nur, dass ich damals mit dem Radl vor Ort war. Wenn der Besitzer das als Privatgelände gemeldet hat, könnte ich mir das schon vorstellen, zumal ich seit damals nicht mehr vor Ort war.
woodpeck (2024-06-06 08:10:30+00:00): Hab mal eine "note" geöffnet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4280701 - vielleicht schaut ja jemand vor Ort vorbei.
pesec (2022-12-05 06:12:17+00:00): Добрый день.
Не забывайте писать имена собственные с заглавной буквы.
В частности, город Тюмень.
south ural (2022-12-05 17:08:49+00:00): Добрый день!
В том-то и дело, что последнее время при указании направления в карточке «Съезд с основной дороги» или какой либо другой дороги сайт сам заменяет заглавные буквы на прописные. С какой это радости от так делает, сам понять не могу.
Thierry1030 (2022-12-05 19:31:37+00:00): Hello Juanjo,
Small question: did you check if the cycle route relation '2-13' is singposted on the field? When I passed by there 3 weeks ago it was not yet signposted ...
Thanks for your reply.
JuanjoMC (2022-12-05 20:22:21+00:00): Hi Thierry,

yes, it is signposted now. I visited it last Saturday as well as 13-15 and 2-18.

Indeed, a month ago or so, a lot of those routes were not signposted yet, but now, at least on my area, they are.

I've heard that the plan is to finish the job by the end of this year.

Cheers.
Thierry1030 (2022-12-05 20:37:05+00:00): Great news!

2 weeks ago Visit Brussels organised a gathering to thank the volunteers who helped checking the signs. Based on the remarks a company would still adapt or put new signs if possible. By principle the "job" should be finished by now.
JuanjoMC (2022-12-05 20:45:36+00:00): "Based on the remarks a company would still adapt or put new signs if possible."

Good to know ;-)

In that case you can tell them that a sign is welcome here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.86961/4.34247

I haven't seen any sign there, but it might be that I missed it.
JuanjoMC (2022-12-05 20:47:46+00:00): url with marker now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.86961&mlon=4.34247#map=19/50.86961/4.34247
Thierry1030 (2022-12-07 19:14:22+00:00): I just added it to 'fixmystreet.brussels'.
you can follow it via this link -> https://fixmystreet.brussels/452081
Stefan Nagy (2023-07-04 19:37:28+00:00): Hallo!

Du hast hier den ursprünglich von mir erstellten Hauseingang inkl. Adresse in ein Restaurant umgewandelt. Das heißt anstelle des ursprünglichen Hauseinganges (den es offenbar nicht mehr gibt) ist jetzt ein Restaurant… Und es liegt zwischen dem Restaurant "Haas Beisl" linker Hand und dem Schnellimbiss "CRISPY" rechter Hand.

Bitte sei ein bisschen vorsichtiger beim Bearbeiten der Karte. Das ist ein ganz offensichtlicher Flüchtigkeitsfehler… Hättest du statt den Hauseingang den Knoten rechts davon – eben das ehemalige CRISPY – bearbeitet, wäre die Sache korrekt. Eben in dem Geschäftslokal, in dem vorher das CRISPY war, ist jetzt Wiener Döner.

Ich schau mal, dass ich das korrigiere.

LG,
Stefan.
emersonveenstra (2022-12-03 19:51:24+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution to OSM! Road names need to be completely spelled out, could you change this to "Royal Oak Lane", please? Thanks! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119219980
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129685620
Tomas Straupis (2022-12-04 08:03:50+00:00): Žinok kažkas su procesu negerai, nes vis generuoji duomenis su kombinuotais namų numeriais alia „7;11“
DaanLT (2022-12-04 08:54:41+00:00): jo žinau kas, žioplumas padėjo generuoti ...
Jakka (2022-12-04 08:44:43+00:00): uw campsite midden een sport veld lijkt niet te kloppen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10236130609
Hufkratzer (2022-12-03 20:01:15+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119231300
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119231302
sehen aus wie Reitplätze; die sollten mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian getaggt werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz . Du hast die als Reitanlagen getaggt; dieses Tag ist für so etwas wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70876812 (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding).

Hier noch zwei andere Reitplätze von dir mit dem gleichen Problem:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815707317
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839558912
palimpadum (2022-12-22 19:22:28+00:00): Alles klar,
danke fürs korrrigieren. Werde mich künftig daran halten.
Cartographer10 (2022-12-04 11:12:27+00:00): Hey,

Heb je met deze changeset deze note volledig opgelost? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3410597
JJJWegdam (2022-12-04 11:40:54+00:00): Waarschijnlijk wel, maar ik heb het gewoon even snel tussendoor gedaan. Niet gedubbelcheckt oid
Cartographer10 (2022-12-04 13:53:48+00:00): Prima, de belangrijkste dingen lijken te zijn gewijzigd. Ik zet hem wel op closed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 12:22:25+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10236115285/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
map per (2022-12-22 12:00:01+00:00): Wegen "Meine Änderungen überprüfen":
Sieht gut aus, danke!
ZeLonewolf (2022-12-08 04:01:24+00:00): Hello!  Just a note that the convention is not to put the name of a river on the water area.  That only needs to go on the waterway line that runs through it.  Otherwise it confuses renderers and geocoders.
Megaminx12 (2022-12-08 13:09:10+00:00): Thanks for the note, I didn't realize that was the convention as I have seen both ways done before.
VictorIE (2022-12-17 14:03:43+00:00): Hi

This relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7890677#map=14/53.1449/-6.2004 appears to have no tags.
gscholz (2022-12-05 08:22:35+00:00): Hi Alikiymaz,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue marker):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=30.56429&lat=39.74184&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129688860

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-12-07 08:38:56+00:00): Hi Alikiymaz, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-12-09 06:50:09+00:00): Hi Alikiymaz, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
Jakka (2022-12-04 08:54:38+00:00): pour les formes des maisons utiliser picc couche et travailler plus précis. Zoom maximum ...
plus part des forme son rectangle ...
Jakka (2022-12-04 08:58:17+00:00): voir les infos astuce dans message welcome merci
ZLima12 (2022-12-05 03:48:52+00:00): As a local, I disagree. Have you driven on it?
FlowerHillPerson (2022-12-05 15:47:50+00:00): I was going strictly by aerial imagery (i.e.: seeing limited-access and dividers, along with shoulders. Feel free to revert if you believe trunk is the better tag.
ZLima12 (2022-12-05 19:09:07+00:00): While it is true that it has those in some capacity along this length, it's generally not as performant of a road when compared to some others nearby (e.g. I-87 and the Sprain). The lanes are more narrow and the road is just harsher. On top of that, intersections start pretty close from here, so trunk +expressway=yes seemed most fitting.
bkil (2022-12-03 22:02:04+00:00): Helló! Látom, hogy a POI és a többi objektum forrása "website", viszont nem találom, hogy mi a POI saját honlapjának a címe ahonnan ez legálisan megtehető, gondolom lemaradt.
bkil (2022-12-03 22:06:24+00:00): A Szaszák Ádám farmja esetén feltüntetett contact:website pedig azért nem megfelelő, mivel az nem a saját honlapjuk, hanem egy harmadik fél üzemelteti. Tehát egyrészt a honlapon keresztül nem lehet kontaktálni a POI-t vagy annak üzemeltetőjét, másrészt pedig szerzői jogi illetve adatbázisjogi aggályokat is felvet külső adatbázisokból, honlapokról történő másolás.
Kiss_Karoly (2022-12-03 23:30:52+00:00): Ez sajnos hiba akkor. A 'website' nem a POI sajátja, hanem arra utalt, hogy a netről vettem az infót. A másik észrevételt a harmadik fél honlapját illetően, értem. Akkor ez javítható, vagy törölni kell?
bkil (2022-12-03 23:44:33+00:00): A térképre csak olyan kerülhet fel ami verifikálható (a létrehozón kívül más is ellenőrizni tudja és ugyanarra a konklúzióra jut) vagy aminek importálásához jogunk van. Használható források: személyes bejárás, családtag megkérdezése, a JOSM légifelvételei, saját vagy mások fotói, saját bemért wifi, az üzlet felelősségi körébe eső bármilyen felület: papírlap az ablakukban, kirakott vastábla a sarkon, weblapjuk (pl. Facebook), telefonon felhívva őket amit lediktálnak, ... https://wiki.osm.org/Street-level_imagery_services
bkil (2022-12-03 23:45:55+00:00): Én is használok webes keresést a kezdeti intuícióhoz, amit utána törekszem valahogyan validálható forrásból felvenni.
bkil (2022-12-03 23:46:42+00:00): Itt is bármikor beszélgethetünk cseten, ez kicsit menőbb: https://matrix.to/#/#osm-esemeny:matrix.org
ZLima12 (2022-12-07 02:15:24+00:00): Hi,

This does not follow the current highway classification guidelines, so I've reverted this in changeset 129803211. I did keep the operator that you added to Phelps, though.

Please review the classification rules at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TMP-Proposal:_New_York/Highway_Classification .

The most important thing in the new system is: trunk does not mean limited access, and limited access does not mean trunk. Use expressway=yes to denote limited-access construction instead. Alternatively, if the road has complete control-of-access and is high enough performance, highway=motorway might be suitable.

The idea behind the new classification system is that the network of all roads that are either motorway or trunk should be all of the most natural long-distance transportation arteries. Some roads might run long distances, but not be nearly as desirable for long distance (e.g. the nearby US-9). Roads like this should usually be highway=primary.

In this case, Phelps Way has intersections, which disqualifies it from being a motorway. It also isn't really useful for long-distance travel, as it would dump you into US-9 or other local roads. This disqualifies it from highway=trunk. The next classification down from there would be highway=primary, which I think is suitable for this road. Secondary seems too low, as it is a much more appealing east/west option than the other roads in the area (which are either tertiary or secondary).

I know that highway=trunk has historically been used for limited-access roads in the U.S., but we're trying to move towards a less fragmented and more usable map in terms of classifications. If you'd like to keep working on classifications, I would appreciate your help in moving the map in this direction as well. #local-newyorkstate on the OSMUS Slack is one place where people discuss classifications like this, and having your voice there would be great, if you'd like to join.

Sorry for the long read,
-John
FlowerHillPerson (2022-12-07 02:53:41+00:00): Hi,

Nothing to apologize for – I honestly really appreciate the time you took to teach me about all this. Thank you, and my apologies for my errors.

Cheers,
FHP
Bienson (2022-12-05 07:19:36+00:00): Und wieder fälschlicherweise als building=detached getaggte Gebäudeteile zurückgesetzt.
Bienson (2022-12-05 07:19:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129728816