piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2021-10-05 15:46:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. После серии ваших пакетов правок получилось наложение линий ЛЭП друг на друга. Скорее всего, придётся откатывать.
mavl (2021-10-05 15:51:43+00:00): Эта линия сейчас идёт неправильно на восточном конце.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294689384  
  
Правильно же было отрисовано, как две ЛЭП сходятся в одну.
mavl (2021-10-05 15:56:40+00:00): Этот столб существует.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3471484067/history  
  
Его прекрасно видно на спутником снимке. Неясно, зачем вы его удалили.
mavl (2021-10-05 16:05:40+00:00): Я удалил линии, которых не существует. В том месте сложное хитросплетение линий электропередач. С ним сложно разобраться, даже разглядывая его на местности.
Kovoschiz (2021-10-04 16:18:29+00:00): There's something wrong here. You removed the `amenity=school`.
ovruni (2021-10-04 21:47:11+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregando una calle residencial ficticia, que no puede visualizarse tampoco desde la imagen que se indica en este conjunto de cambios. Existe alguna otra imagen aérea que se encuentre usando?
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-10-04 10:22:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
This is a building only project.
concentrate on that and map just buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112068006
Frans S (2021-10-04 10:18:59+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112068011
Frans S (2021-10-04 10:17:49+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Be sure to map buildings individually. and do not oversize buildings 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112068171
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
Frans S (2021-10-04 10:14:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
This is a building only project !
Why do you map a piece of a path, without trace on the ground and tag is as footpath (restricted for urban areas, like solitairy paths strictly for pedestrians?

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112068331
Frans S (2021-10-04 10:07:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
This is a building only project. Stick to buildings please.
Your mappings have an offset to Mapbox. PLease read the instructions about using of Images.
PLease square also each building you map.
You mapped roads as tertiary roads (meaning connecting villages etc to eachother) 

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112068387
ovruni (2021-10-04 21:49:25+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregando una calle residencial ficticia, parte de esta vía es una escalera, lo que puede visualizarse desde Esri aclarado.
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ovruni (2021-10-04 21:52:11+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregando una calle residencial ficticia, en este lugar existe solamente una vía de peatones, esto puede visualizarse desde la imagen de Esri aclarada 
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-10-04 10:20:07+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112068911
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ovruni (2021-10-04 21:55:52+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregando una calle residencial ficticia, que no puede visualizarse desde las imágenes aéreas. ¿Cual es la imagen se encuentra utilizando?
Saludos
Frans S (2021-10-04 10:19:33+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112069091
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
4004 (2021-10-10 22:52:11+00:00): жаль конечно
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-16 19:02:26+00:00): با سلام
ثبت شما منطقی به نظر می‌رسد اما ایراداتی دارد:
ژاندارمری تنها از سمت تازه میدان، به صورت دو مسیره و دارای خط ویژه است.این تقاطع را به ثبت قبلی خودم بازمی‌گردانم. ان‌شاءالله بعد از اینکه از اینجا تصاویر مپیلاری بارگزاری کردم برای نوع ثبت تصمیم گیری کنیم.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Ltrlg (2021-10-04 12:18:14+00:00): Ce nouveau nœud duplique l’information présente sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985487861 (ajoutée par vous-même il y a deux semaines et présentement visible sur le rendu « OSM Carto » affiché par défaut sur openstreetmap.org) et présente le même problème que celui que je vous ai déjà signalé il y a trois jours (cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111808949). Je supprime donc le nœud.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:47:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ovruni (2021-10-04 22:03:35+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregando una calle residencial que conecta con la avenida, sin embargo esta calle no llega a la avenida, ya que luego existe una vereda.
Saludos
Saludos
ovruni (2021-10-04 23:22:36+00:00): Hola, he creado un hilo en la lista de correos de la comunidad peruana sobre las ediciones que ha realizado. Por favor participe allí.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-October/000896.html
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ququruzka (2021-10-13 19:25:58+00:00): добрый вечер.
названия улиц, бульваров, переулков и т.д. в Украине пишутся на государственном языке.
возвращаю ваши правки.
в след раз - будет жалоба в комьюнити.
frydzio (2021-10-04 13:57:58+00:00): Nie wiem czy dobrym pomysłem jest dodawanie do punktu oznaczonego jako wejście adresu. Po pierwsze duplikowany jest punkt adresowy, który jest już na budynku. Po drugie wejście z adresem 1D jest nie tylko wejściem do budynku, ale również wejściem na osiedle. Zobacz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:entrance?uselang=pl
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
julcnx (2021-10-04 12:01:15+00:00): Thanks for your contributions. In the future, please kindly split your changes into smaller geographical changesets. For more info: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112071242
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-10-04 11:31:41+00:00): Hello. 
A remark.
This is a building only project. Why spending time to map roads. Those will be mapped (automaticly?) on another project.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112071735
Steve J H (2021-10-04 14:10:03+00:00): Hello Frans. I can't see the changeset here on OSMCha, curiously. However, any roads I've mapped or modified today were outdated and no longer aligned with Mapbox, so often cause overlaps and shared nodes when new mappers add buildings. Also, it's just satisfying! 
Best wishes,
Steve
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112071735
Frans S (2021-10-04 15:41:55+00:00): I understand. I also modify the route when it is obvious that they crosses buildings and so.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112071735
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-05 17:40:36+00:00): come messi d'accordo utilizza → al posto di >, grazie comunque per il contributo apprezzato!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112071749
SHARCRASH (2021-10-04 11:11:18+00:00): + names corrected
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Dimacn (2021-10-05 06:10:52+00:00): А вы можете сразу названия улиц писать на дорогах, чтобы адреса домов не висели в воздухе? Речь про такие дома и многие другие - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987345559 - Адрес на доме есть а улицы нет
kashcheeva (2021-10-05 06:14:58+00:00): Да, конечно могу. Не досмотрела, поправлю.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
felipeeugenio (2021-10-04 14:49:24+00:00): Eugenio
Por favor ojo con las ediciones. dejaste todo desconectado. Tuve que revertir y corregir la edición. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112072168
wireguy (2021-10-04 12:31:05+00:00): Hi chromogenic, welcome to osm.   Which changeset had false deletions?  Did you try and contact the user first?  Do you have local knowledge?   Some of your changes seem fine, but others seem odd for someone new to osm.   For example, Why delete all the sidewalks in the new development?
chromogenic (2021-10-04 13:04:34+00:00): Hi wireguy,
this is a revert (somehow). There were some conflicts, so I've copied together this changeset in a new JOSM layer.

Sorry for losing the sidewalks; I've tried to restore them with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112076750
SomeoneElse (2021-10-04 11:35:23+00:00): Hello (and welcome to OpenStreetMap!),
I hope you don't mind me asking a favour - is the Laurel Inn up the road still closed due to Covid?  I'm guessing not now; it was when I was in Robin Hood's Bay last year https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1359823766 but I haven't had chance to revisit.
Thanks,
Andy
osmviborg (2021-10-04 11:50:34+00:00): Adresse- noderne fik 'roof:colour'
osmviborg (2021-10-04 12:04:26+00:00): Alle noder
osmviborg (2021-10-04 13:11:33+00:00): Adresse- noderne er rettet.
kartonage (2021-10-04 14:01:32+00:00): Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

please don't delete objects just to redraw them. This is not efficient use of time and work.
You can just move them or modify their geometry.

You also deleted some residential landuses, is that correct?

You can see your changes here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112073099

Thanks

Best regards

자동 번역:
Hej 그리고 OpenStreetMap에 오신 것을 환영합니다.

다시 그리기 위해 개체를 삭제하지 마십시오. 이것은 시간과 작업의 효율적인 사용이 아닙니다.
그것들을 이동하거나 형상을 수정할 수 있습니다.

주거용 토지도 일부 삭제했습니다. 맞습니까?

변경 사항은 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112073099에서 확인할 수 있습니다.

감사 해요

친애하는
eggie (2021-10-04 21:04:21+00:00): Dag Andre  Lijkt me oke zo. Wellicht geldt de maxspeed=30 ook op de andere weggedeelte?

MVG
eggie
Joe-w (2021-10-04 19:19:52+00:00): Congrats on your first changeset! All the building outlines look fine to me. I've removed the amenity=dentist & healthcare=dentist from the building area as there is a node representing these tags already. Sometimes the building itself has the amenity tags, sometimes mappers create an extra node with them instead. To have both would be duplicating data! Thanks and happy mapping. :)
Sandal man (2021-10-07 08:54:39+00:00): Gracias por tus cambios, pero cometes muchos errores por descuido, responde.
Sandal man (2021-11-17 13:58:02+00:00): Si no hay respuesta, lo eliminaré.
MA Barracus (2021-11-17 14:56:15+00:00): Hola. Termina en una acequia transitable.
MA Barracus (2021-11-17 14:56:57+00:00): Y pasada la acequia, continua.
Sandal man (2021-11-17 16:40:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=36.84395&lon=-2.46990#map=18/36.84372/-2.46889
Pero, ¿qué es esto, por ejemplo, dos caminos uno al lado del otro y uno encima del otro?
Layer-1 ?
Embankment ?

Width= <0,5  debe ser Width= 0.5
Lea la wiki para obtener más información.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:width
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:embankment
MA Barracus (2021-11-17 19:03:29+00:00): Estoy intentando arreglarlo para que no se superpongan caminos. Gracias por tu ayuda.
MA Barracus (2021-11-17 19:09:54+00:00): Creo que he arreglado algo, pero he duplicado Vereda de los polvorines continuación.
Intentaré arreglarlo más tarde.
Frans S (2021-10-04 12:43:26+00:00): Thanks for mapping here 
Please tag the buildings as mentioned in the instructions. just building=yes
Thanks
Frans S (2021-10-04 12:43:58+00:00): And, square each building you map
Best regards
osmviborg (2021-10-04 12:34:31+00:00): Cykelstien er lavet på et gammelt dige, der hedder 'Margrethediget'.
Frans S (2021-10-04 14:34:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
If mapping for HOTOSM. like here, the standard tag for mapped buildings is building=yes.
From a satelite image you cannot see what the function is of a building. Local mappers will complete that.
Also square each building you map

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112074213
Nakaner-repair (2021-10-04 12:08:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 110414374, 95057772.
Nakaner (2021-10-04 12:13:17+00:00): What I wanted to say: There was a administrative unit with admin_level=2 mapped around a riff in the middle of the sea. The way it was mapped means that there is a independent country which just covers the riff and the surrounding sea. That's vandalism and the reason for the revert.

I did not want to say that the country South Korea on the mainland does not exist.
fabiotofy (2021-10-07 07:00:19+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto. Per il Friuli Venezia Giulia, solitamente, si usa mappare i civici come elementi puntuali da tenere separati rispetto all'edificio. Ho estratto quindi dai tag che avevi creato sull'edificio gli elementi del civico creando fuori un elemento puntuale. Un saluto. Gruppo di modifiche: 112092194
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112074425