piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2017-12-31 20:28:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2017-12-31 20:50:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
dieterdreist (2018-09-14 22:40:29+00:00): the Amundsen–Scott Station is off by almost 5 degrees of latitude.
roptat (2018-01-01 08:31:33+00:00): Salut, et merci pour tes contributions !

Il y a quelques problèmes avec ta contribution : tu as ajouté des voies déjà existantes, ce qui dégrade la qualité de la carte. Par exemple, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550175746 suit exactement le trajet de la RN3 qui existait déjà.

Tu as aussi ajouté une voie sans tag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550175735), ce qui ne veut rien dire...

Le cimetière de Cheik Moussa existait déjà avec une meilleure description, pourquoi l'avoir dupliqué ?

Je sais que OSM est compliqué à prendre en main au début, donc si tu as des questions n'hésite pas. En attendant, je vais nettoyer un peu tout ça.

Au fait, on dirait que le projet HOT a été créé pour une formation. Tu pourrais m'en dire un peu plus ? Merci :)
GerdP (2018-10-06 09:25:42+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed this change because of the unusual tag highway=impassable used here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550176507
If I got that right MapBox Sat image shows a new road there.
Colin Smale (2018-01-10 10:08:02+00:00): Better to delete the toilets entirely, if there is no (immediate) possibility of re-opening. Data consumers cannot process the free text comments and will assume the toilets are still there.
naoliv (2018-01-01 01:26:22+00:00): Alex, usted tiene alguna razón para eliminar las áreas residenciales, por favor?
althio (2018-01-12 09:42:33+00:00): pour le syndicat, j'ai mis office=labor_union
MKnight (2018-01-07 11:40:56+00:00): Moin, living_street haben kein explizites maxspeed, ich habe es wieder entfernt.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 22:09:25+00:00): removido
viloan (2017-12-31 23:26:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-01-01 06:45:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use for addr:state the two uppercase character abbrevation for the states. Please read http://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/ also.
trigpoint (2018-01-01 21:00:28+00:00): Hi, Chanel seem a bit of an odd name for a Jewelers? Should it be tagged as shop=perfume?
Cheers Phil
Digne (2018-01-03 20:01:30+00:00): Small remark here: I see you added a name to the waste baskets here, but I doubt they are actually named a number. ref=* is probably a more suitable tag than name=*.
km2bp (2018-01-10 21:25:48+00:00): Am using the numbers on the name tag because ref = * tag. it is not visible in the mobile application. I like topographic maps. Numbering as a name is sometimes good. I use mobile application Maps.me.  I often add a different video guide to the maps. An example of how to act in practice. https://youtu.be/NhHVryVie8M
gendy54 (2018-01-04 23:18:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour la contribution.
Je n'ai pas vu de grosse erreur, sauf des non-corrections d'erreurs faites par les contributeurs précédents, mais ca viendra.

Une remarque quand même. J'ai supposé que le sentier n'était pas sur un pont sur toute la longueur. Je l'ai donc arbitrairement (n'étant pas sur place) limité au passage de la rivière.
Et j'ai changé la qualification en sentier et non en chemin pour piéton, légèrement différente.
Par ailleurs attention de ne pas joindre les chemins du pont avec celui de la rivière. Ils avaient un point en commun alors que dans la réalité, ce n'est pas possible.

Par ailleurs, il est préférable d'utiliser l'imagerie aérienne de l'IGN plus précise et plus actuelle que celle de Bing: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Sources_de_donn%C3%A9es/France#IGN_BDOrtho

Bon courage
BCNorwich (2018-01-01 07:45:20+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
From looking at the several aerial image layers available it looks like the way ought not to have been deleted. IMHO there is a way here and on the opposite side of Avenue Road and they could be described as highway=service, service=driveway and maybe access=private.
A highway does not have to be for public use to be on the OSM database. Have you been past there to determine the ways do not exist in any form?
Regards Bernard
Minh Nguyen (2018-01-01 01:54:56+00:00): Plugged several gaps in the imported data around street corners and where walkways through apartment complexes met sidewalks on public streets. Added noexit=yes, barrier=wall where appropriate to satisfy near-but-not-connected validator. Deleted a sidewalk segment that was actually a hedge.
BCNorwich (2018-01-01 08:15:59+00:00): Hi the area added as landuse=residential (Way: 550188877) is within an already mapped residential area (Way: 48976223). Thus the new area is a duplication. It's usual to map larger areas as residential, not each back garden.
I've re-tagged the address for 6 Avenue Road to conform to OSM practice. I wonder though if that property is apartments or two houses?
I also removed the POI peak from the little park. Were you trying to map a tree, for which the tag is natural=tree.
Regards Bernard
Marcos1cromer (2018-01-01 13:43:58+00:00): Hi Bernard.

The 6 Avenue Road property is indeed a series of apartments accessible through the one door rather than two houses.

Additionally, the tree is a point of interest within the road and is used as a landmark and feature for the local community. Would it not be better to re introduce the point of interest with the correct tag rather than completely delete it?

Thanks,

Marcos.
BCNorwich (2018-01-01 14:37:05+00:00): Hi Marcos, Thanks for replying, I've changed number 6 to apartments and replaced the POI stating it as natural=tree. 
Regards Bernard
user_5359 (2018-01-01 06:36:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
user_5359 (2018-01-01 06:37:08+00:00): If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead.
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:17+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Minh Nguyen (2018-01-01 02:40:52+00:00): Source should be San José Public Works Department, not Bing.
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:19+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
ottwiz (2021-06-21 11:28:00+00:00): Hey, just saying if you made that huge multipolygon in the forest, you should've splitted it further around because i'm couchmapping in JOSM the forests around as part of the #ottwiz-mapping-50-states project, but JOSM for me is really lagging because of the huge multipolygon with around 270 members. 

I might split it around so when anyone downloads the area for editing, their computer won't stutter. thanks
ottwiz (2021-06-21 13:52:39+00:00): Also, this is for the landcover aka natural=wood, so not for the boundary=protected_area
viloan (2018-01-01 03:35:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jonsger (2019-12-24 14:04:51+00:00): Is the German name of the village "Ein kinia" really "drusisches Dorf LP Seite 768"? Sounds more like the source of the name...
chihchun (2018-01-06 16:58:29+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55069242
Supaplex (2018-01-21 10:44:50+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mueschel (2018-01-02 19:18:09+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way and its name? The tag doesn't look right:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181200720

Cheers, Jan
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:21+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
tonyf1 (2018-01-01 06:54:35+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your map contribution. Unfortunately your entry of Auburn High School is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28664520
I think your entry should be deleted.
tonyf1 (2018-01-02 05:40:30+00:00): No reply, deleted.
Supaplex (2018-01-21 10:48:31+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
naoliv (2018-01-09 12:13:15+00:00): Por favor, evite editar las fronteras. Mucho se quedó incorrecto.
5m4u9 (2018-01-09 15:12:01+00:00): @naoliv, sabes de qué forma está definida la frontera? con la argentina por ejemplo "era" el curso del río de la fecha del tratato y ahora es otro curso y hay que separar la frontera del río.
//
ocurrirá el mismo caso para frontera brasil-bolivia?
naoliv (2018-01-09 15:17:01+00:00): Yo sólo dejé de la forma en que estaba anteriormente (antes del boundary quedarse abierto/duplicado).
JJIglesias (2018-01-09 15:21:00+00:00): La frontera va por el Margen del RIO GUAPORE/ITENE osea por el Riverbank, no por donde teoricamente va la linea del rio (waterway)
naoliv (2018-01-09 15:24:37+00:00): JJIglesias, el problema es que muchos límites quedaron incorrectos (abiertos o duplicados).
Algunas áreas quedaron como parte de Brasil y Bolivia al mismo tiempo.
naoliv (2018-01-09 15:27:01+00:00): Puedo corregir la frontera si usted me muestra el trazado correcto.
JJIglesias (2018-01-09 15:27:02+00:00): Es que ese es el Problema, Esas AREAS No estan claramente definidas en el tratado de fronteras y por lo tanto SON DE BOLIVIA y BRASIL a la vez.OSM NO es un tratado oficial de limites amigo; asi q SI esas partes quedaran Bolivia-Brasil;hasta que NO exista un tratado exacto de limites IBGE-IGM
JJIglesias (2018-01-09 15:27:44+00:00): Asi que la frontera es el RIVERBANK no el waterway...
naoliv (2018-01-09 15:38:39+00:00): Después voy a conferir con http://scdl.itamaraty.gov.br/pt-br/fronteiras_da_scdl.xml
JJIglesias (2018-01-09 15:40:33+00:00): No Hay un TRAZADO oficial exacto, asi q el Riverbank es el trazado de frontera
5m4u9 (2018-01-09 15:49:03+00:00): aunque no es el caso de esta sección, según la comisión bra-bol "el límite es el curso del río"//
http://www.la-razon.com/sociedad/Bolivia-Brasil-reforzar-frontera-Acre_0_2228177167.html
//
"...La comisión boliviana, una vez realizado el estudio y la verificación, establece conclusiones: la primera es que la crecida del río Acre puede modificar la trayectoria del curso de agua, pero el límite internacional “ya está delimitado y demarcado”..."
// 
esto me dice que el límite es el dicho en la fecha del tratado
JJIglesias (2018-01-09 16:04:42+00:00): Como OSM NO es un tratado de fronteras NI limites; asi la Frontera es el Rivebank hasta que alla una delimitacion exacta de la trayectoria de la frontera delimitado por waypoints oficiales donde establezcan que Islas estan en Brazil y que Islas estan en Bolivia...
JJIglesias (2018-01-09 16:12:47+00:00): naoliv; ustedes trazaron la linea del rio (waterway) a conveniencia sin soporte de ningun tratado; para todos efectos el Riverbank es la frontera, no por donde ustedes dibujaron el waterway
naoliv (2018-01-09 16:25:08+00:00): Voy a verificar en el tratado y corregir lo que sea necesario.
Pero el riverbank no puede ser el límite entre los países, ya que está sujeto a cambios de geometría, inundación, sequía, etc.
naoliv (2018-01-09 16:41:54+00:00): http://info.lncc.br/bolivia.kmz tiene exactamente la definición de marcos, islas y trazado de las fronteras entre los países.
Se definió conjuntamente con el Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto de Bolivia.
Es lo que voy a utilizar para verificar.
JJIglesias (2018-01-09 18:06:20+00:00): El waterway tambien se modifica de acuerdo a las condiciones del rio, y la aparicion y desaparicion de Meandros (oxbow) los archivos KMZ que indicas No es data validada pero SI ayudan a entender la trayectoria imaginaria, la frontera esta a equidistancia de cada orilla (shoreline) del rio, y la definicion de nombres y territorialidad de islas tambien esta bueno...
En todo caso esta frontera deberia llevar la connotacion (ONLY FOR REFERENCE)
naoliv (2018-01-09 18:12:31+00:00): Si, claro. Voy a utilizar sólo como referencia para corregir las fronteras, y no importar exactamente lo que existe en KMZ.
Y los ríos deben ser mapeados usando el lugar más profundo, en lugar de ser equidistante de los márgenes.
Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rivers#Linear_Way y https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalweg
JJIglesias (2018-01-09 18:20:49+00:00): por eso es que se dibujan los riverbanks en estos casos, el rio No sabes por donde es mas profundo, ya q no hay una batimetria precisa, y ademas es muy cambiante los bancos de Arena posibles.
Tu traza la frontera de referencia y nosotros seguiremos trazando el Riverbank como Rio Guapore/Rio Itenes.
Saludos
naoliv (2018-01-10 20:57:27+00:00): Acabo de enviar algunas modificaciones.
Por ejemplo, la Isla Suárez https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35582743 es ahora parte de los dos países (debido a la disputa https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isla_Su%C3%A1rez); varias islas que estaban siendo parte de Brasil ahora son parte sólo de Bolivia (ejemplo, la Isla Grande https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550361561).
Todavía falta bastante para arreglar.
Yo aviso cuando acabar de actualizar todo.
5m4u9 (2018-01-10 21:26:39+00:00): @naoliv a las secciones de límites de ambos lados con problemas, vendría bien añadir boundary=disputed? 

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=disputed
naoliv (2018-01-11 03:40:54+00:00): @51114u9 creo que no es necesario.
Es posible ver que el lugar está englobado por las dos fronteras.
Y la disputa es, en cierto modo, "amigable" también.
lleung (2018-02-12 08:03:46+00:00): sidewalk是路边人行道；内街小巷不应该设置为sidewalk
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:24+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:26+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Radek_trz (2018-01-01 11:31:12+00:00): Na którym końcu tego odcinka zaobserwowałeś ten stan faktyczny? Bo na południowym nie ma nawet podbudowy.
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:28+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:30+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
TheSwavu (2019-08-18 07:24:32+00:00): Hi,

Is this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550206424 really a playground? On the aerial imagery it looks like a collection of bike paths.
MapRad (2019-08-18 09:56:59+00:00): Yes a small playground within the bike paths. Yes I have been there
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:34+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Andreeeee (2018-01-01 10:55:20+00:00): partially reverted by #55071352
bufferclip (2018-01-01 13:33:03+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für deine Ergänzungen. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass die Gebäude nicht rechtwinklig sind. Hab eine Notiz dazu gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1254464 Ich werd das bei Gelegenheit mal angehen. Viele Grüße und ein frohes Neues!


---
Thanks for your edits. The buildings seem to be distorted. I added a note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1254464 I might fix it later. Best regards and happy new year
bufferclip (2018-01-01 13:48:50+00:00): ging doch schneller als gedacht: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55076183
Владимир К (2018-01-16 06:28:09+00:00): ошибочное использование тега. нужно вешать только на железнодорожные станции. откатываю.
Владимир К (2018-01-16 12:43:46+00:00): Беру свои слова назад. Вопрос снят, тег вернул.
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:36+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
CRCulver (2018-01-06 23:36:28+00:00): Please be more careful in future when adding POIs. You added the Casamar Hotel in Tarfaya, but the hotel was already there on the map. I have now had to delete the duplicate POI.
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:38+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Constable (2018-01-01 10:06:12+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro di questa sterrata https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550215060 ? conosco la zona ma non ci passo da alcuni mesi, non mi risulta però che ci siano ponti che attraversano il Naviglio Sforzesco e si connettono a questa sterrata che gli corre a fianco https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140930019
geri-oc (2018-01-01 15:50:55+00:00): Schön das du etwas ergänzen konntest. Ist aber roof:levels hier tatsächlich 2?
auch wenn building:levels=2 müssten es 4 Stockwerke sein:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:levels

Gruß Gerd
geri-oc (2018-01-01 15:40:40+00:00): Hallo, bitte statt maxspeed:type=* in DE https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:source:maxspeed
verwenden. Falls es durch die APP so getaggt wird - bitte als Fehler melden.

Und bitte Notes löschen (erledigt kommentieren), wenn etwas eingetragen ist: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1254318

Wilkommen im 2018 und OSM - Gruß Gerd
PT-53 (2018-01-01 16:13:22+00:00): @geri-oc:
Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60027
Grüße
geri-oc (2018-01-01 16:36:17+00:00): Ist ja richtig - aber es wird fehlerhaft durch die APP gemappt - und geändert hat sich nichts - außer das immer mehr solche Sachen eingetragen werden.  
Ist genauso wie in der Wheelchair-APP die an eine Bushaltestelle mit wheelchair=no noch Toiletten einträgt.
Digne (2018-01-03 20:06:34+00:00): Again a small remark on the name tag of this artwork: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5314505751

I doubt the artwork is actually called horse. Please consider using description:en=* instead of name=*
km2bp (2018-01-10 19:54:04+00:00): Done. name:en=horse  https://goo.gl/maps/sXLnNMyXiv42
miche101 (2018-01-01 10:18:03+00:00): Hi, ein gutes Neues Jahr :-) So sieht ein Hühnerhof also von oben aus.. das erklärt die ganzen Gebäude , aber den Sport Hühnerreiten gibt es glaub ich noch nicht *g*

MfG Miche
opendcc (2018-01-01 10:24:38+00:00): Hi Michi, auch gutes neues Jahr. Gestern war ja quasi Frühlingsbeginn und ich bin dann gleich mal los ...
miche101 (2018-01-01 10:30:26+00:00): ja stimmt, gestern war es schon sehr warm :-) Da wäre Radlfahren auch a gute alternative gewesen :-)