piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
adlid (2019-03-08 23:52:24+00:00): Has this been confirmed as applying retroactively to existing infrastructure and with the naming scheme as now mapped? From the source: "We are checking with the Mayor’s office whether existing Cycle Superhighways and Quietways will have their names changed to Cycleways, or whether the rebranding just applies to future infrastructure."

From the TfL website, the on the on-the-ground infrastructure and the existing consultations for proposed routes, the branding currently remains as 'Superhighway', 'Quietway', 'CS#' etc: https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/cycling/
Looking at the TfL and london.gov press releases, I don't yet see anything concrete about the change, besides that one site used as your source.

I'm not saying this isn't going to eventually be correct, just perhaps a bit early when none of the infrastructure or branding has been updated or formally announced when/how it will be updated? Presently the map now reflects how the network might look based a proposed change, rather than the current nature of the infrastructure and branding.

Perhaps the new names should be tagged as 'proposed:name' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed:name) and then flipped to 'old_name' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name) after a more concrete timeline is announced?
MacLondon (2019-03-09 03:04:09+00:00): I agree that they haven't formally given details of the rebrand but TfL have themselves already been referring to the future routes 4 and 9 as Cycleways - see https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2019/march/new-projects-to-receive-50-million-to-create-healthy-streets-across-london. I still have CS4 and CS9 as ref values for these.

That page also refers to the existing CS3 as Cycleway 3, but I didn't rename any of the existing routes.

Also the CS9 consultation page at https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/cs9/ was updated at the end of Jan, stating that "this route will no longer be called a Cycle Superhighway".

Until further details are announced, I've left all Quietways as before, all 'ref=*' as before, and all route names for existing Cycle Superhighways are retained too as I had wondered if they might even have kept the same name.

All existing and known about future  Quietways and mini-hollands are still in a separate network relation at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6088752.

Other future main road routes e.g. 'Hackney to Isle of Dogs' weren't going to be quietways, so they have always been included in the same network as CS routes from when I first mapped them with generic 'xx cycle route" (scheme) names, so the only change I made is to now use a less generic "xx Cycleway" name, although the official names will probably be numbered 'Cycleway x'.

On OpenCycleMap, nothing has actually changed as no ref value has changed. If on another map, the cycle route names do get shown, then only the future proposed CS routes would have their names changed from the names TfL have already abandoned.
adlid (2019-03-09 11:49:07+00:00): Ah OK, I hadn't found that part of that press release, I'd presumed there'd be a more specific one. The use of Cycleway 3 is indeed suggestive of their intention to get everything getting renamed at some point.

When eventually retagging the live routes, is the 'proposed:name' -> 'old_name' method the correct way to go? The same looks like it can be done for ref, although it's not yet clear what the new ref might be.

Thanks!
MacLondon (2019-03-09 20:43:57+00:00): That would be the correct method, yes. I'd wait for more details before using 'proposed:name' on existing routes for now though. Because the existing CS route numbers were based on a clock face design, they could spring a surprise, e.g. Cycleway 1 could yet be the future Camden-Tottenham Hale route rather than the existing unimpressive CS1.

I've been told that part of CS3 in east London has had some very recent repainting of both the blue colour and the "CS3" ref on the road, possibly 'suggesting' that the ref won't be getting changed. Re quietways, maybe Quietway 1 will just be renamed as 'Cycleway Q1'.

I get the feeling the official rebrand might be imminent, although TfL might be waiting to synchronise it with the launch of a new or extended cycle route.
adlid (2019-03-09 22:52:13+00:00): Of course, I was just considering the eventual options for tags; I’ll leave widespread re-tagging to yourself or others, as you seem to have a better handle on it all.

Interesting, I’d heard the blue paint may be reconsidered, but only rumours. It seems crazy to repaint it all though and, for the sake of partial consistency (with previously published maps etc), I hope the suffix number remains consistent. I’ll keep an eye out for changes on the ground.

Thanks
DaveF (2019-04-26 12:02:18+00:00): Hi
Should the wiki be updated? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycle%20network?uselang=en#United_Kingdom

Has UK:London Quietways been amalgamated into the new 'Cycleway' or should it be added as a separate classification?
MacLondon (2019-04-26 23:17:55+00:00): Hi DaveF,
I've done a mini update of the wiki now.

UK:London Quietways is still separate at the moment as the unified network hasn't taken effect yet. Also there hasn't been much details yet about the new 'Cycleways' network.
Privatemajory (2019-05-13 18:06:31+00:00): Pour info, j'ai rétabli le nœud #3677866835 (Ranomafana) supprimé dans mon groupe de modifications #70203719.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-07 10:11:55+00:00): Hallo,
wenn ich schon als Betreiber eine Ladesäule eintragt, dann bitte aber auch mit alle möglichen Informationen. Näheres hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=de
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Lokai (2019-03-07 10:11:53+00:00): Hallo,

deine Kartierung bedeutet Parkplatz auf Parkplatz. Ich habe die Daten übertragen.

Viele Spaß bei OSM

Gruß

W.
utack (2019-08-11 19:31:27+00:00): Hi,  
is this cycleway connected to the road where it begins?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675100600  
Thank you!
geoaria (2019-03-09 11:56:45+00:00): تغییرات شما باعث خطا در نقشه و مسیریابی شده است. هدف شما از این تغییرات گسترده چیست
mavl (2019-03-08 15:05:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Sosha1996 (2019-03-31 03:57:49+00:00): دوست عزیز شما برای مشخص کردن مکان‌ها یا باید نقطه بزنید و یا محدوده بکشید. هر دو همزمان اشتباهه.
romeoko (2019-03-07 11:13:25+00:00): Willkommen!
Gruß aus Baruth/Mark,
Romeo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67870841
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-07 13:06:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет улицу и добавляет на то же самое место другую улицу. Так делать настоятельно не рекомендуется. Если нужно изменить название улицы, то нужно поменять значение тега name. Удалять для этого улицу нельзя. В OpenStreetMap можно что-то удалять, только если это что-то больше не существует на местности.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
eggie (2019-03-07 08:47:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-03-07 08:59:01+00:00): Merkwaardig, want de "dader" is geen onervaren mapper. 'k Vermoed dat hij gewoon onbewust de tags heeft gekopieerd bij zijn acties. 
Tags hadden meer met uitzondering tweewielers te maken op eenrichtingsverkeer. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-07 10:32:52+00:00): 'k Vrees zelfs dat het een mechanical edit was met dit als kwalijk gevolg. Begrijp van Leo dat hij de voorgaande mapper in zal seinen.
Leo Slager (2019-03-07 11:33:20+00:00): Bij controle blijkt dat nu alle fouten zijn hersteld. 
Groot compliment voor RousseauR voor zijn inspanningen.
Roger Rousseau (2019-03-07 12:29:10+00:00): Dank voor het compliment! Het was inderdaad een vreemde gewaarwording, vooral omdat alle straten verspreid door Den Haag (en naar later bleek ook Rijswijk) lagen. Maar het is gelukt. Wanneer zie ik de wijzigingen op OSM? Ik ben van de Gemeenschappelijke Meldkamer in Den Haag en wij maken gebruik van OSM, vandaar.
eggie (2019-03-07 12:44:35+00:00): Dag Rousseau.. De rendering van de standaardkaart van OSM ligt praktisch stil momenteel. Wanneer je op de humanitarian layer kijkt zie je de correcties al doorgevoerd.
In de data staat het dus goed. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67880400#map=18/53.14527/7.02221
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-07 12:48:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67871519#map=18/53.14527/7.02221&layers=H
Deze link wellicht handiger. :)
eggie (2019-03-07 13:15:26+00:00): Mn hyperlinks hebben ook de hik.. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.06568/4.33480&layers=H

Bij deze..  :)
Roger Rousseau (2019-03-07 13:20:59+00:00): Nu is mijn collega hier meer in thuis dan ik, maar bedoel je met "De rendering van de standaardkaart van OSM ligt praktisch stil momenteel. Wanneer je op de humanitarian layer kijkt zie je de correcties al doorgevoerd" dat het nog wel een tijd duurt voordat het zichtbaar is op de standaardkaart?

Dit is mijn eerste wijziging geweest, en ik weet niet of wij ook andere layers kunnen weergeven. Maar dat zal ik nog wel aan mijn collega vragen (als hij hersteld is van zijn griep...).

groet,
Roger Rousseau
eggie (2019-03-07 13:56:34+00:00): Precies.. De data is oke, maar de standaardkaart gaat traag.
Zie https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=740406#p740406
Je kunt dus het best de humanitarian layer weergeven. Die is zelfs snel. 
,.... maar het kan ook zomaar weer verbeteren.
Gr Eggie
mavl (2019-03-07 12:56:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Для качества дорог есть тег smoothness:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoothness
Sosha1996 (2019-03-31 04:01:14+00:00): فکر میکنم روی تابلو این مسجد اسم صاحب الزمان قید شده. جدیدا تبدیل شده به قائم؟
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-07 13:11:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Снова удаление существующей дороги. И добавление почти такой же. Почему на Советской покрытие гравий? Там асфальт. Видел его своими глазами.
Иван Николаевич (2019-03-07 15:51:21+00:00): Поворот налево, да асфальт, а подъезд к домам (прямая дорога) это не асфальт, а грунтовая дорога.
На счет редактирования понял, разберусь и больше так не буду делать(удалять и свое создавать).
mavl (2019-03-07 12:41:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, почему изменён тип дороги?  
  
На этой улице стоял знак "Жилая зона" и улица была обозначена highway=living_street. Этого знака больше нет?
Иван Николаевич (2019-03-07 15:31:10+00:00): Знак жилая зона с противоположной стороны 2 этажного здания(которое через дорогу от 27 дома).  заезд возле леса начинается, к другому лесу площадка. Позже пройдусь там обозначу.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:09:02+00:00): Всё ясно. Спасибо. Если есть знак жилая зона, то используется специальный статус дороги, например  highway=living_street.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
Leo Slager (2019-03-07 08:56:22+00:00): Hartelijk dank voor deze actie.
Ik zal degene die de fout gemaakt heeft informeren, zodat zoiets in de toekomst niet nog eens gebeurd.
Denk je dat je alle fouten hebt gehad, of heb je nog hulp nodig ?
We kunnen bijvoorbeeld zichtbaar maken waar dit allemaal fout is gegaan.
A67-A67 (2019-03-07 14:30:34+00:00): Goed werk! Het lijkt helemaal opgelost te zijn: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/GJT
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-04-21 07:34:10+00:00): Please, look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1752177
j1scad (2019-12-10 23:58:16+00:00): In Ohrdruf wurden fast keine Strassen umbenannt, die "Crawinkler Str." wurde nur in Wölfis zur "Auf der Schwemme", siehe: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.ohrdruf.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Strassenumbenennungen_Einheitsgemeinde.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjH1PqIoqzmAhWOecAKHWubBKEQFjAAegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw1Gk31fq4F53bD8fn5SMJfj.
Kannst du ja vielleicht nochmal korrigieren.

Schöne Grüsse
ma-rt-in (2019-03-07 10:09:31+00:00): Hallo,
ich bezweifle das das ganze Gelände eine Hausnummer hat. Zudem stimmt die Straße nicht. Man darf nicht alles sturr von der Firmen Website übernehmen. Habe es nun selbst angepasst.
geoaria (2019-03-08 13:05:54+00:00): دلبل حذفیات خرابکارانه شما چیست
aixbrick (2019-03-07 17:37:22+00:00): Hallo,
mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67892202 habe ich ein paar Korrekturen an dieser und den anderen Stationen vorgenommen. Die Wichtigste: addr-Tags sind für postalische Adressen gedacht und gehören nur an Objekte, die Post empfangen können.
Ich habe die neuen Stationen außerdem noch der Relation hinzugefügt.
Gruß
Peer van Daalen (2019-03-07 21:12:46+00:00): " addr-Tags sind für postalische Adressen gedacht und gehören nur an Objekte, die Post empfangen können."
-
Oh, das wusste ich nicht. Ist mir nie irgendwo aufgefallen in den einschlägigen Informationen.
Alles klar | Peer
user_5359 (2019-03-10 17:53:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
geoaria (2019-03-09 11:55:33+00:00): هدف شما از این تغییرات چیست
mavl (2019-03-08 15:05:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
elgolfo (2020-05-05 18:35:17+00:00): Hallo Tobi27,

ist dort wirklich eine Saugstelle oder ist das ein Fehler?

Viele Grüße
Moritz
pavvv (2024-05-10 16:25:35+00:00): Co to znaczy full_terminal=yes?
maraf24 (2024-05-11 19:10:33+00:00): Dawno temu niektóre stacje posiadały klawiaturę.
ndm (2019-03-07 20:10:59+00:00): There are no 20mph zones in Bristol -- roads are listed individually in TRO's. We should be mapping speed limits based on presence or otherwise of speed limit signs.
southglos (2019-03-07 23:11:49+00:00): True, and point taken, but I think on the balance of probabilities that it's more likely that when all the surrounding (and more major) roads got changed to 20mph that this bit was missed out during the retagging, rather than it actually being a 30mph cul-de-sac with a 50km/h service spur surrounded by 20mph roads.

And, not a permissible source, but...

https://www.bristol20mph.co.uk/wp-content/maps/Phase-1-Central-Sept-2016.pdf

Genuine question: if you know where to find Bristol's made TROs, please let me know, because blowed if I can find them and they'd be useful in this situation.  Surely they should be online somewhere, or do they still just stick them in a newspaper and that's it?

Feel free to change back if the 20mph assumption offends.  I'll verify next time I'm doing a Mapillary pass.
ndm (2019-03-07 23:38:18+00:00): I have the same problem with the TROs -- I'm sure I saw them once, then never managed to find them again.

I'll leave the limits as is -- but will add the roads onto my list of places to check :-)
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-03-07 18:07:35+00:00): Hi Darwanza, upon reviewing the edits you made in this changeset, I notice some discrepencies [ https://i.imgur.com/x4X0k0v.jpg ] I took the liberty of correcting them in the following changeset [ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67893973 ]
Darwaza (2019-03-08 08:49:16+00:00): Hi Diógenes, thanks for correcting
gurglypipe (2019-03-07 10:17:01+00:00): Are these flats? If so, I guess building=apartments, plus building:flags= and addr:flats= might be more appropriate?
Casey_boy (2019-03-07 10:26:02+00:00): I guess they are but I didn't really think building=apartments was an appropriate tag. They're more like houses split into flats. They have seperate street entrances (rather than a shared entrance) for example. Perhaps building=residential and then addr:flats might work?
gurglypipe (2019-03-07 10:33:11+00:00): According to the wiki, building=residential is a general purpose tag which people should consider refining where possible (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dresidential).

That said, were these originally built as semis and then all converted to flats, or were they originally built as flats? If they were originally built as semis, then I guess they should be building=house (with one area per semi), and building:use=apartments. Since building= is supposed to tag the original use of the building, rather than its current use.

Assuming they were originally built as flats, I’d go with building=apartments, building:levels=2 (or whatever it is) to indicate that they’re not tower blocks, and an addr:flats= key on each entrance, showing that they’re single entrances. Though I don’t know if you recorded that much detail in your survey!

🤷
Casey_boy (2019-03-07 13:24:32+00:00): Updated to change to apartments. I didn't record where the individual doors were, so I couldn't add the specific flat number to an entrance. Instead, I've put the flat number range in the building tags.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67883042
gurglypipe (2019-03-07 13:34:50+00:00): Nice one.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-07 16:15:41+00:00): Hallo,
hast du eine offizielle Quelle zu deiner Sperrung? Den Wenn die Baustellen nicht länger als 8 Wochen gilt, gibt es andere Wege dies einzutragen.
kevinq (2019-03-07 17:58:43+00:00): Ist seit neustem teil meines Arbeitsweges, und die Straße ist derzeit komplett aufgerissen, da ist nur noch Sand zu sehen welcher nicht einmal planiert ist. Das wird wohl noch einige Zeit dauern ehe man da wieder fahren kann.
Stadthausbrücke Richtung Süden, und ein Stück von Düsternstraße sind auch gesperrt, da die aber nicht komplett aufgerissen sind, habe ich es dort gelassen wie es ist.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-07 18:40:37+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe mal hier eine note dazu gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1703096
ma-rt-in (2019-07-09 13:40:17+00:00): Hat sich hier was neues ergeben?
kevinq (2019-07-09 16:22:18+00:00): Wird immer noch gebaut. Fährt immer noch jeden Tag ein Radlader umher. Offenbar wird die Straße auch so lange Basutelle bleiben bis der Platz daneben auch neu ist. Da schleppen sie regelmäßig große Granitsteine hin.
Wulf4096 (2019-07-14 13:06:03+00:00): Können Radfahrer und Fußgänger hier längs?
kevinq (2019-07-14 13:14:06+00:00): Radfahrer definitiv nicht. Fußgänger eventuell wenn man sich durch die Tische vom Bäcker schlängelt. Teile des Bürgersteiges werden auch umgebaut, ich weiß aber nicht aus dem Kopf wie weit hoch. Absperrung geht bis an die Ampel von Stadthausbrücke.
geoaria (2019-03-07 17:37:50+00:00): Your sabotage changes with the josm softwares in the city map of Isfahan have caused a widespread destruction of the city map of Isfahan. Please do not take sabotage. Before editing the map, be sure to familiarize yourself with the osm rules and procedures. Josm software is related to professional level mappers.
geoaria (2019-03-09 11:54:47+00:00): هدف از تغییراتی ایجاد کرده اید چیست
Sosha1996 (2019-03-31 04:59:32+00:00): لطفا از ۲تا اسپیس در اسم استفاده نکنید:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679171732
Dettorer (2019-03-07 09:57:29+00:00): Add a general medical practitioner: Dr. Stéphanie Liu.
user_5359 (2019-03-10 18:13:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of your node!
eggie (2019-03-07 10:15:30+00:00): Hoi.. Dit gaat niet helpen.
Ik zou het zo doen..
name=Computerhulp Direct
website=https://www.computerhulpdirect.nl/
office=it
it:type=consulting
phone=0031.....

Kijk ook even hier.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-03-07 10:17:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dit
eggie (2019-03-07 10:28:48+00:00): shop=computer geeft een symbooltje op de kaart, maar ik weet niet of dat de lading dekt?
Sosha1996 (2019-03-31 04:07:45+00:00): این مکان بصورت نقطه مشخص شده بود، نباید دوباره بصورت محدوده رسم بشه. یا نقطه یا محدوده.
تگ lit برای خیابان استفاده میشه.
همچنین برای مواردی که مرز مشترک دارن باید از رسم مالتی‌پبیگان استفاده کنید. الان مرز استخر با مرز منطقه نظامی یکیه. این کار شما باعث شده یه خط تکراری بوجود بیاد که اشتباهه.
mavl (2019-03-07 12:48:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок создаёт непрямоугольные здания.
mavl (2019-03-07 12:50:11+00:00): Буквы в номерах домов должны быть большими. Это общероссийское соглашение:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
mavl (2019-03-07 13:35:12+00:00): Не указана улица:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132815
mavl (2019-03-07 13:41:02+00:00): Не указана улица:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132789  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132816  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132817  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132820  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132821  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132822  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132823  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132824  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675132825
canfe (2019-03-09 06:54:25+00:00): Ma il ristorante Furnasa ha ora DUE sedi??
Bertu90 (2019-03-09 07:06:10+00:00): Si, è proprietario di un’altra sede in Frazione Crot
geoaria (2019-03-07 17:38:11+00:00): Your sabotage changes with the josm softwares in the city map of Isfahan have caused a widespread destruction of the city map of Isfahan. Please do not take sabotage. Before editing the map, be sure to familiarize yourself with the osm rules and procedures. Josm software is related to professional level mappers.
wille (2019-03-07 21:32:45+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição. Você deletou erroneamente um nome de plano inclinado.
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67876975
gurglypipe (2019-03-07 11:20:52+00:00): Hi. I’ve reverted this edit (here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67879030) because it’s not actually necessary — this footpath is already part of the Dales Way relation (which describes the entire route), which you can see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/29302

Thanks!
Map-Peter (2019-03-09 17:24:56+00:00): Hallo Christian, 
ist der Name des Aussichtspunktes ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6322705606 ) wirklich "112" ? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name 
Gruß Peter
chribre (2019-03-09 18:43:36+00:00): Hey, 
nee das war ein Versehen, danke fürs Bescheidsagen.