piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
overflorian (2019-07-30 19:27:23+00:00): J'avais pas vu les notes, merci. J'ai fait une séquence mapillary que j'ai uploadé il y a une heure.

Que veux-tu dire par "Euh, "yes" ? :p" ?
Phyks (2019-07-30 19:53:41+00:00): Super, merci !

cycleway:*=yes n'est pas une valeur valide. J'imagine que c'est une "lane" ici (bandes cyclables dans le même sens que la circulation motorisée) ?
overflorian (2019-07-30 21:27:59+00:00): oops, en effet, je suis allé trop vite. C'est corrigé, merci
Phyks (2019-07-30 21:31:12+00:00): Super, merci !
Carto'Cité (2019-08-19 13:43:31+00:00): Bonjour.
au sujet de la rue de Belleville (https://www.osm.org/way/633809114), elle passe bien en sens unique comme explicité par le changeset de Britzz en avril 2019 (https://www.osm.org/changeset/69588898), plus récent que l'orthophoto, et l'information officielle https://www.mairie19.paris.fr/actualites/retrouvez-la-presentation-l-amenagement-de-la-rue-de-belleville-356.
Je supprime donc le fixme :-)
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto'Cité, projet #cartoVeloIDF
user_5359 (2019-07-30 20:09:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short inquiry to the key service_times: the services are held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case add a Su at the beginning of the value. Please notice also: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
thatoneiowan (2019-07-31 04:29:20+00:00): Thanks for the edit! I didn't expect any of these small rural bridges to have any significance, but I was wrong! My road-geek is telling me I have to go and see it just for kicks and giggles.
viloan (2019-07-30 18:31:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
sovereign_ch (2019-07-31 08:50:46+00:00): Hoi, wäre es nicht sinnvoller den bereits dokumentieren key 'branch" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:branch) anstelle von 'branch_name' zu verwenden? Keyinfo meint auch ~105'500 versus 107(sic!). Grüessli
keujfl839237 (2019-08-02 15:38:00+00:00): Hoi, doch, das wäre wohl sinnvoller. Ich habe den Key branch schlichtweg übersehen, da ich nach "name" gesucht habe. In dem Fall wäre es wohl am besten, die Grössenbezeichnung (M, MM, MMM) in den alt_name zu verschieben, z. B. name="Migros" + alt_name="Migros MM" + branch="Bern-Bahnhof". Gruss
keujfl839237 (2019-08-02 15:47:20+00:00): Voilà, ist korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72947168
A67-A67 (2019-07-31 14:29:36+00:00): Hallo Kiromiji,
Een privé-voetpad dat wel bestaat, verwijderen we niet van de kaart, maar taggen we met access=private. 
Zo laten we zien dat het pad er daadwerkelijk is, maar niet publiek toegankelijk is.
Kiromiji (2019-07-31 15:21:21+00:00): Dank voor je advies. In dit geval is het echt priveterrein en geen wandelpad, maar een pad naar de voordeur van de op dit priveterrein liggende woningen. Mij lijkt niet dat dit pad dan op de kaart hoort te staan. Paden naar voordeuren staan bij geen enkele woning op de kaart. Uitzondering hierop is het pad op de naastgelegen kavel (aan de Copernicusstraat), waar dit pad een meer openbaar karakter heeft. Wanneer duidelijk is hoe dit pad exact gaat lopen en hoe het verhard wordt kan ik ook bepalen of we het alsnog een naam moeten geven, zoals je eerder voorstelde.
Nogmaals dank voor je advies.
Arne Schwarck (2019-07-30 18:40:09+00:00): https://openstreetcam.org/details/503839/191
Zabir91 (2019-07-30 21:23:46+00:00): মুল নাম নিজের ভাষায় হবেঃ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
Zabir91 (2019-07-30 21:27:26+00:00): ধন্যবাদ ওপেন স্ট্রিট ম্যাপে অবদান রাখার জন্য :) 

---
রাস্তার নাম 'উত্তর কাশিপুর ৌদ্ধ বাড়ী বাস্তা' এখানে বৌদ্ধ হবে নাকি বদ্ধ (বন্ধ) হবে।
literan (2019-07-30 20:34:35+00:00): ну и какой это нафиг trunk?  Читайте правила: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
dval (2019-10-08 10:50:03+00:00): Hi, AlexSev2018! Что значит на тротуарах access=no? Также bicycle=yes на тротуарах противоречит ПДД, а foot=yes излишне.
DavidKewley (2019-08-05 06:26:53+00:00): I have concerns with your converting former primary roads wholesale into trunk roads, especially where they are not divided, e.g. most of CA 74 from San Juan Capistrano at least to Lake Elsinore. Could you explain your reasoning?
user_2066394 (2021-05-25 11:30:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105274313
PT-53 (2019-07-31 04:36:59+00:00): Hallo Arne,
bist Du dir sicher, daß dort ein Ortsschild mit der Beschriftung Hochstetten steht?
Es gibt doch gar keinen ofiziellen Ortsteil Hochstetten. Oder liege ich da falsch?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-31 05:43:58+00:00): Sorry,
hätte openstreetcam vorher anschauen sollen.
Grüße
Arne Schwarck (2019-07-31 11:37:43+00:00): ;-)
eggie (2019-07-31 07:12:28+00:00): Houd je zelf de verhuisplannen in de gaten van DWA?
Gr Eggie
PT-53 (2019-07-31 04:33:27+00:00): Hallo Arne,
bist Du Dir sicher, daß an dieser Stelle ein Ortsschild von Burgrieden steht?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-31 04:38:57+00:00): Sorry,
hätte openstreetcam vorher anschauen sollen.
Grüße
Arne Schwarck (2019-07-31 11:36:41+00:00): Kein Problem. Probiere immer das mit als Quelle anzuhängen. Ist aber ein sehr komischer Platz.
eggie (2019-07-31 06:49:27+00:00): Hi Nickuge.. tag name=  in stead of name:en for rendering.
Don't add adddresses in OSM.. use the present addressnodes. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-07-31 07:00:17+00:00): name:en changed into name=
ajf3934221 (2019-07-30 19:51:06+00:00): Punkt auf aktuelle wgs84 Position geschoben (Differenz war ca 60cm)
hieuvan (2019-12-15 07:06:25+00:00): It looks like you are screwing up a lot of OSM data in Hanoi by splitting long ways into lots of smaller ways and adding redundant tags.
Frans S (2019-07-31 10:01:12+00:00): Hi CJoanne. Thanks for mapping here.
Sorry to say but you made a false start.
The imagery to be used as default is the MAXAR p imagery. Maxar P is much younger then the BING imagery you used and show much more buildings which can be mapped as well.
About your mappings. From the 32 buildings you mapped are 28 not squared. (always square with the Q key in iDeditor when the building is still selected)
You also tagged buildings as house or landuse=farmland. No idea why. 
default tagging of buildings is building=yes 
Do you have an account on Slack channel Crowd2Map Tanzania? There you find instructions and is help offered.
Since this is your first mapping I strongly advise to join that channel if you did'nt do that already
Review also the mapping guidelines to improve your mappings

Please take a look to these documents as well
New mapping instructions   https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bS_TVHPFHKKVBSdjx3RRQdxhdWrMJ3wdEh_BSnsL4hI                     https://drive.google.com/open?id=1N1rXlAyGcJ6VJ2p3qbD4PRsuo65o3pC5yHB2wq1TGEc
Best regards and keep mapping
Wulf4096 (2019-08-01 07:21:59+00:00): Hallo!
Du hast https://osm.org/node/6662473362 hinzugefügt.
Ist das ein Duplikat von https://osm.org/node/1419118262 oder steht hier nun tatsächlich eine zweite Ladesäule?

Danke!
pittrichimica (2019-08-02 18:28:39+00:00): Hallo und danke für den Kommentar.
Öhm... die Ladesäule habe ich im Vorbeifahren gesehen, es scheint mir aber, dass ich beim Editieren die schon eingetragene übersehen habe... d.h. sie könnte wieder weg.
Meiner Erinnerung nach steht sie aber tatsächlich ein bißchen weiter vorne als die bereits eingatragene...
pittrichimica (2019-08-02 18:29:03+00:00): Korrektur: eing*e*tragene
Wulf4096 (2019-08-02 19:06:51+00:00): Hab's dann gelöscht. Ich hab die Position nochmal (anhand von Bildern) geprüft; passt.
viloan (2019-07-30 20:24:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Lejun (2021-12-11 19:54:32+00:00): Salut, les modifs datent d’il y a 2 ans déjà et j’ai pas la motivation de refaire tout ton historique d’activité, est-ce que tu as rajouté d’autres highway=cycleway depuis ?

Comme signalé dans une note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2836013) ces attributs n’étaient pas utilisés selon les usages définis par la communauté (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=cycleway). L’attribut highway=cycleway désigne plutôt une piste cyclable séparée de toute forme de trafic. Pour une bande cyclable, qui suit le tracé de la chaussée, on préfère directement utiliser cycleway=lane sur le chemin représentant la chaussée. Pour plus d’infos n’hésite pas à consulter le wiki où sont décrits différents cas de figure (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:bicycle).

En bref, j’ai corrigé les modifications (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114828844), suis à ta disposition pour toute question, te demande de faire attention par la suite ainsi que de vérifier si tu as fait d’autres modifications de ce type qui n’auraient pas été signalées/corrigées
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-17 07:08:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6323407526/history has amenity = office that was added in this edit
It should be rather tagged with office=* tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
Boza22 (2019-08-02 09:47:29+00:00): Hi, what was wrong with this contribution? Thanks
Snusmumriken (2019-08-02 10:02:42+00:00): Well, parts of Eriksön were dislocated several hundred meters north, as can be seen here
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=72786784
eteb3 (2019-10-12 10:19:40+00:00): Thanks for scraping up lots of my nameless POIs in this changeset.

Re 'Fresh Nata', is this from an eyeball survey? That one I intentionally left without a name as there's nothing above the door (that I could see).
RAC_UK (2019-10-12 11:23:30+00:00): This would have been from a drive by over the summer to clear up a few things, it could be what it said on the door or window.
eteb3 (2019-10-12 12:47:36+00:00): Ah yes, I see that's in the window. I think that's an advert for their wares, rather than a name. FHRS has yet another name. (And they're trying to sell the lease so may change again soon...)
fmarier (2019-07-31 05:31:48+00:00): "Gardeners of the Galxy"
I assume that's a typo and it should read "Galaxy"?
dooley (2019-08-01 10:49:17+00:00): Hallo ma_rt_in.

In diesem und in u.a. Changesets hast du addr:postcode und addr:city wohl irrtümlich  vertauscht. Korrigierst du das?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72830158
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72830267

Gruß, Frank
ma-rt-in (2019-08-01 11:07:21+00:00): Halllo,
danke für die Info. Sind bereits angepasst.
vg
David Crochet (2019-08-09 12:36:48+00:00): Rien sur l'imagerie aérienne ne montre une telle modification du foncier. Qu'elle est la source d'information qui vous a permis de créer cette route ?
StephaneP (2019-08-16 10:08:57+00:00): Tu lances le revert David ?
David Crochet (2019-08-16 10:31:55+00:00): c'est fait
Jose Luis Infante (2019-07-31 15:05:17+00:00): Hola,
gracias por tu contribución.
Solamente un consejo. Si vas a dibujar edificios, no lo hagas con imagen satélite o aérea. Puedes usar la capa de Catastro, con lo que el dibujo será mucho más exacto.
También hay una opción en el editor para ortogonalizar líneas (es decir, "cuadricular" ángulos que hechos a pulso no quedan muy bien).
Un saludo!
marcelcolladomoreno (2019-07-31 19:53:48+00:00): Hola,
Gracias por los consejos, así podré hacer contribuciones de mayor calidad.
Un Saludo.
alester (2019-07-30 22:45:01+00:00): I'm just curious, but what was bogus about the Lockeport data? Have most of the buildings in Lockeport been demolished? I couldn't see anything fundamentally wrong with the data.
atomwaffen (2019-07-31 01:00:35+00:00): Hi alester,

the buildings are all wrong when you compare them to DigitalGlobe Vivid or similar. I mean they really look fake: 10 neighboring buildings with distinct layouts discernible in high-resolution imagery all had the same building outline according to Dartmouthmapmaker.

BTW: I'm very sorry for meddling together multiple things, but when trying to upload only a selection there were conflicts I was unable to resolve.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-21 01:11:27+00:00): DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
- mass deletion of existing buildings including their addresses, w/o replacement or refinement
- deletion of existing natural=wood
- mechanical removal of landuse=industrial from wastewater
- intentional mixing different kinds of edits
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-21 01:27:48+00:00): at least the buildings/addresses could be restored.
Phyks (2019-07-31 09:51:58+00:00): Question au passage, on est sûr que ce ne sont pas des DSC (contresens pour les vélos) ? Il n'y a pas de pictogrammes indiquant de sens de circulation sur tes photos Mapillary.

Rue Marcel Sembat / rue Auger, ils ont bien posé les pictogrammes (on a une configuration similaire avec la piste à gauche) ?
overflorian (2019-07-31 15:07:11+00:00): à vrai dire j'ai hésité à attendre les pictos pour mapper. Mais bon ça fait une semaine alors je me dis, mappons comme ça, et puis si ça se précise par la suite nous changerons
abakus_uploader (2019-07-30 22:31:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2019-08-20 10:22:32+00:00): Hello ReBoNL. Thanks for mapping here.
I had to revert all your mappings here exept those in the settlement in the south east.
You mapped lots of irregularities or bushes as buildings. See my previous comments about how to determine that something is a building
Best regards and keep mapping
rainerU (2019-07-31 06:23:28+00:00): Hallo Tobias,

Danke für das Hinzufügen der Bushaltestellen. Ein kleiner Hinweis: das Feld "operator" ist dafür vorgesehen, den Betreiber zu erfassen, also SWU, DING usw. Du hast dort einen Hinweis auf die Linie eingetragen, welche die Haltestelle anfährt. Solche Hinweise bringt man besser in einem Feld "note" unter, Vielleicht kannst du das ja ändern.

Grüße und viel Spass bei OSM

Rainer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72831450
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-07-30 23:44:59+00:00): this is what happens when you edit russia lmao
user_3022894 (2020-01-04 14:54:55+00:00): Hi Harald, die Busstation Hattingen Mitte war hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25913465 bereits als Way vorhanden, sodass ich den von dir erstellten Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6662866201 dann wieder entfernen würde...
Viele Grüße, Lukas
s8evq (2019-08-26 11:40:17+00:00): Inderdaad niet, want op de websites vind je hier niets meer over. Maar de bordjes staan wel nog op veel plaatsen? Ik ging die eens fietsen.... best niet dus :)
PT-53 (2019-08-04 06:25:29+00:00): Hallo Akkurator,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diese Linie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464969631/history ein Hinweis self_intersection_ways angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.52009&lat=47.89887&zoom=16&opacity=0.34
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Akkurator (2019-08-06 22:26:05+00:00): fixed, danke
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73086507
PT-53 (2019-08-11 05:06:11+00:00): Jetzt gibt es da in keep right noch einen Hinweis "mehrere Punkte an einem Fleck, Node 6662729893":
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=113045945
Grüße
sannkc (2019-07-31 06:09:50+00:00): Hi, there - I was taking a look at this changeset and I see your point about city names disappearing at certain zoom levels.  

Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be the right solution.  A second city node will give us two labels at the more detailed zoom levels, as well as duplicates in the search results.  Users will be left to wonder which is the "real" Saint Louis.

Actually, this seems like more of a rendering issue than a missing data issue.  Different renderings of OSM data handle the placement of placenames differently.  OSM-Carto (the default style) handles it one way, but others, like Openroute Service, Wheelmap, OpenTopoMap, and CycleMap, display Saint Louis more prominently.  A fix would require changing the style, which is handled by the OSM-Carto design team.  I don't know if they've addressed this issue before, although they probably have.  You can check past discussions or make new proposals for changing the style here: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues

Sorry I don't have better advice to offer.  By the way, great work on the Clayton area!  It keeps looking better and better.
eggie (2019-07-31 05:39:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Alleen name=  ... zal niets doen in OSM. De aard van het bedrijf ontbreekt nog.Bv office=company oid.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-31 05:42:05+00:00): In OSM wordt geen bedrijfsinfo op de gebouwen zelf getagd Die hoort alleen op de adresnode. Deze info graag verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-31 06:08:29+00:00): tagging aangepast.. info van gebouw verwijderd.
Gr Eggie
viloan (2019-07-30 22:28:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
letihu (2021-02-15 19:38:28+00:00): tags fehlen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709043163/history
Hjart (2019-07-30 23:14:31+00:00): Please note that the cycleway warning due to complaints has been removed from newer versions of JOSM
sperlingskauz (2019-07-30 23:38:15+00:00): Hi Hjart,

it was a conflict between highway=cycleway and foot=designated. I use the latest josm version.

greetings,
sperlingskauz
Hjart (2019-07-30 23:55:29+00:00): You're using the latest "tested" version. The warning has been removed from the development version and the next "tested" will not report it. See https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17901
rainerU (2019-07-31 06:17:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour tes contributions à Argelès-sur-Mer. Pour que les autres contributeurs peuvent bien évaluer tes contributions, il est de bon ton d'ajouter un commentaire parlant lors de la sauvegarde et non pas une seule lettre. Normalement, on ajoute aussi le champ "source" lors de la sauvegarde pour indiquer d'où on tient les données ajoutées.

Merci et bonne continuation sur OSM

rainerU
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72832401
user_5359 (2019-07-31 04:38:03+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM)! Thanks for the addition. Unfortunately, we can't guarantee that Google will take this addition from us, but many delivery services, including Amazon, no longer use Google maps.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-12-30 22:32:47+00:00): aqui voce criou varias coisas duplicadas, deletei, por favor pare de mapear assim.
Your Village Maps (2019-09-10 00:12:10+00:00): Has the new interchange that was under construction at US 169, MN 41 and CR 78 actually completed? I went through there 9/4/2019 and only remember construction currently going on. Or am i thinking of something else?
TheRoadDudeMN (2019-09-10 00:13:23+00:00): I found out that yes, it’s currently under construction. I’ll change the tagging later today.
viloan (2019-07-31 01:41:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DP24PH (2019-07-31 03:47:08+00:00): Note from DEARPAUL24 from the Philippines: You have fixed the incorrect tag, but the scope of the edit may involve multiple countries. Hopefully, you will separate the edits in one country - one changeset at a time. It may bother other editors on some countries where stringent editing rules are applied.