piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
camminatoreseriale (2021-10-08 01:19:08+00:00): E' vero che il tag è generale, ma non è generico, e soprattutto è obbligatorio per le stazioni, come puoi vedere anche proprio nella tabella al link che hai indicato tu  ("posti in cui i passeggeri aspettano un veicolo del trasporto pubblico di qualsiasi tipo"). ;-) Casomai potremmo indicare quello più specifico, però bisogna essere sicuri di essere precisi, altrimenti rischiamo di passare dal generale allo sbagliato. ;-)
EneaSuper (2021-10-08 09:17:11+00:00): D'accordo, allora mi consulterò con altri mappatori e vedrò cosa conviene fare.
camminatoreseriale (2021-10-14 22:06:36+00:00): Ma no, se mi spieghi il problema esatto provo a cercarti io nel manuale inglese l’indicazione che sia corretta sia in base al manuale, sia ovviamente allo stato di fatto 👍🏻Ne veniamo fuori in qualche modo. Dimmi un po’ la tua perplessità e il nodo esatto 👍🏻
EneaSuper (2021-10-15 09:12:36+00:00): Adesso che ci penso bene credo che tu abbia fatto la cosa giusta: non si indica solamente la banchina in senso ferroviario e, quindi, generico per la categoria ma anche il fatto che serve per il trasporto pubblico.

Tutto chiaro, perdonami 😅
Frans S (2021-10-02 13:04:14+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Sorry to say, but your mappings are so poor that we had to remove them.
Inaccurate, oversize, not squared.
Please be more accurate in next mappings
Best regards
SekeRob (2021-10-04 16:43:07+00:00): Towers... saw something flashing by referred to a Torre di Conan di Barbaro at a source we're not allowed to refer to. It is in the big white Maiella area with endless scrub, grass and bare rock patches I've been working on off-and-on between Roccamorice and Pretoro. Heard of or seen? Someone's fantasy maybe...
Mashin (2021-12-13 05:50:41+00:00): Hi,
can you explain why did you change all the residential/secondary roads to paths?
Also the buildings are of very poor quality, can you please improve them so they match the true shape from the imagery.
Baloo Uriza (2021-10-02 15:42:57+00:00): That's clearly not a trunk, buddy.  Let's not encourage upward priority creep.
txemt (2021-10-02 15:52:55+00:00): That’s clearly a trunk road as defined by the wiki. It’s also a continuation of road segments, which you have edited as trunk roads.
txemt (2021-10-02 15:54:02+00:00): It may not be YOUR definition of trunk road, but it is established within the wiki.
Baloo Uriza (2021-10-02 16:29:26+00:00): Either way you want to cut it, most of America isn't connected *that* well.  Let's avoid aspirationally tagging the wishful thinking of the HFCS.
txemt (2021-10-02 16:33:06+00:00): What’s wrong with tagging the functional classification of a road?
Baloo Uriza (2021-10-02 16:36:53+00:00): When it only exists on paper and there's nothing else that really brings it up to the level of a proto-motorway trunk, it's effectively the same as tagging the interstates in Alaska as motorway.  It's overstating the character of the road based on a purely political process for funding.
txemt (2021-10-02 16:42:38+00:00): Purely political? Huh?
Baloo Uriza (2021-10-02 16:47:18+00:00): I'm not opposed to trunk, but, let's not smash everything to trunk when on the ground it's not really built as anything different than a primary.  Let's wait until what's on the ground actually matches what's on the paper.
txemt (2021-10-02 16:50:16+00:00): What do you mean “on the ground?”
txemt (2021-10-02 16:52:06+00:00): If you want to discuss tagging, why do I keep seeing FIXME tags with “check lanes” done by you? Why not fix the number of lanes? Same with tag=construction: minor?
txemt (2021-10-02 16:54:39+00:00): Why are you creating trunk roads in rural areas, then turning them into primary for a mile when they hit a small town? Isn’t there supposed to be a continuity of road segments?
Baloo Uriza (2021-10-02 21:24:42+00:00): Because they become a boulevard before returning to a larger highway again.

As for fixme=check lanes, it's to mark what highways haven't been checked yet.  I've been working on getting the lanes done throughout Oklahoma as travel and time permits.
compdude (2021-10-02 22:40:00+00:00): I know I've mentioned this multiple times on the talk-us mailing list but it bears repeating: the wiki states that only highway=motorway implies anything about the physical  state of the road, whereas the other highway=* tags are not. The consensus in the US tagging community seems to now be that trunk roads don't necessarily need to be expressways. Please use the expressway=yes tag for expressways.
compdude (2021-10-02 22:43:36+00:00): Also, tagging short segments of road as trunk just because it happens to be divided (or a super-two) for like a mile or two is just as bad as when people tag expressways as a motorway for like a mile or so just because there happens to be one interchange. Also, if a road is primarily built as an expressway but becomes undivided in a town, it should still be tagged as trunk. The road's importance is *not* reduced when it goes thru a town.
txemt (2021-10-02 23:07:53+00:00): If the FIXME is being done as notes for reference, then I completely understand that. 

What does a 4 lane divided highway have that a 4 lane undivided highway doesn't have, besides a median? How are you determining boulevards?
Baloo Uriza (2021-10-03 01:29:12+00:00): Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's not a consensus considering it doesn't work and only a few people seem to go with the wiki on this.  Even data consumers like osmand and rand mcnally assume trunk is expressway.
Baloo Uriza (2021-10-03 01:29:48+00:00): Going from trunk to primary isn't a reduction in importance, it's a reduction in the road.
compdude (2021-10-03 01:31:57+00:00): >Going from trunk to primary isn't a reduction in importance, it's a reduction in the road.

Yes it is, trunk roads are more important than primary roads by definition.
txemt (2021-10-03 01:32:42+00:00): How it is a reduction in road? It's the same road.
compdude (2021-10-03 01:34:48+00:00): Regarding consensus, I strongly encourage you to check out the discussions at slack.openstreetmap.us.
Baloo Uriza (2021-10-03 01:42:53+00:00): The expressway dumps off into a boulevard.  That's a reduction.

With all due respect, I think folks need some perspective.  What a few folks in a slack channel and who gatekeep on the wiki preventing folks from documenting how things actually get tagged in the real world say doesn't a consensus make.  Haranguing people endlessly alienates people from the project and doesn't change the data consumers who have been, and still do, use the pre-NE2 idea of trunk in the US.
compdude (2021-10-03 01:47:59+00:00): What would you define as consensus then?
txemt (2021-10-03 01:49:52+00:00): I'm not seeing an expressway in Oklahoma Panhandle. The nearest expressway I see is I-40, connecting Amarillo to OKC. 

Where are you getting the definition of boulevard?
user_11435438 (2021-10-04 17:04:36+00:00): 老哥啊，source应该用半角分号隔开的，不是逗号
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111941360
adreamy (2024-04-09 13:09:49+00:00): 안녕하십니까?
바뀜집합에 내용이 많아서 검수가 좀 어렵네요. ^^
로동신문 어떤 기사 내용을 어떻게 반영한 것인지 좀 적어주실 수 있을런지요?
특히 북한 관련 소식은 정보가 많지 않아 다른 분이 검증할 수 있는 방법이 많지 않습니다. 편집에 반영하실 때에는 조금 자세하게 적어 줄 필요가 있다고 봅니다.
고맙습니다.
Baloo Uriza (2021-11-01 23:50:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Josef73 (2022-07-02 17:15:04+00:00): Guten Tag, ist der Zugang von Montag bis Freitag möglich?
Frans S (2021-10-03 13:06:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Map each building individual. Square buildings

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111942764
DP24PH (2021-10-06 12:14:24+00:00): Unfortunately, there are several flaws here:
1. Diversion Road is hereby used as a trunk roadway to avoid the downtown area, and this edit may pose serious issues due to the old bridge closure brought by the structural integrity being compromised and under repair. DP24 have edited earlier to classify as a local roadway, even if AH26 is currently assigned.
2. "677-Div" is an invalid ref tag whereas "677" is the valid one.

Note: Diversion/Bypass Roadways will be classified as "trunk" by default to avoid further navigation and legal issues, and for protection as well for the non-residents bypassing the downtown areas on their pass-thru. Hopefully, this will help you a lot, and this edit will be reverted back to the original setting.


DP24
Frans S (2021-10-03 13:14:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Please map more accurate and do not collect multiple buildings as 1 building. Your mappings are far oversized here.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111943007
rocky2109 (2021-10-01 04:22:35+00:00): Source: DCS NSW Imagery; DCS NSW Base Map
Suornode (2021-10-01 04:40:23+00:00): Cuáles fueron los cambios?
Nakaner (2022-03-04 14:51:38+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz folgenden Weg von der Kreisstraße DGF 16 getrennt. Besteht dazwischen keine Verbindung mehr?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103360267/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/988480144

Viele Grüße

Michael
Muggel2 (2022-03-04 21:52:32+00:00): Ich habe zwar die Verbindung unabsichtlich getrennt. aber ich habe nach längeren nachdenken das Gefühl, dass wir das eine Leitplanke davor gebaut haben. Wenn diese Verbindung tatsächlich noch existiert , dann kann es sein, dass die Verbindung an anderer Stelle an die Kreisstraße angebunden ist. Am kommenden Dienstag bin ich für Vermessungsarbeiten dort vor Ort. Da kann ich den Verlauf überprüfen. Der Weg ist aber eher ein Trampelpfad auf der Dammkrone.
Frans S (2021-10-01 12:21:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped.
You included the yard next to a building a few times.
 Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111943606
martianfreeloader (2022-04-10 13:00:12+00:00): Did you want to map this as a tourism/holiday appartment intentionally? Or did you rather mean building=apparments ?
crtomir (2022-04-15 10:01:28+00:00): I meant regular apartements
martianfreeloader (2022-04-15 10:53:44+00:00): See my comment here: https://www.osm.org/changeset/119651803
Frans S (2021-10-01 09:49:24+00:00): Hi. Thanks for mapping here.
You did not map all buildings on this task. All over the task are still buildings. 
Please use Bing for the clouded parts
Best regards and keep mapping
MxxCon (2021-10-03 01:13:58+00:00): Hello.
How were these roads broken that you fixed them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111944642
syntex (2021-10-29 23:45:44+00:00): Reverted
syntex (2021-10-24 21:26:55+00:00): Why are you deleting villages without any reason?
syntex (2021-10-24 21:46:37+00:00): Reverted
letihu (2021-10-18 05:47:17+00:00): Warum fehlen hier denn jetzt die Straßenverbindungen?
alsternerd (2021-10-18 05:59:15+00:00): Weil weggerissen wurden, um einen Kreisverkehr zu errichten und Navis nicht trotzdem noch dort entlang führen sollen.
kartonage (2021-10-18 06:22:06+00:00): Anstatt zu löschen, empfiehlt sich aber ein umtagging. Ein Fehlen von Daten ist in der Regel nicht aussagekräftig, weil dann einfach Daten nicht vorhanden sind.
Am Ende kann man die vorhanden Wege und Objekte eventuell auch einfach wiederverwenden.

Dafür bietet sich das construction-Tagging an.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=construction).
Nakaner (2021-10-18 19:10:27+00:00): Hallo alsternerd,

da der Bereich laut https://www.hansestadt-uelzen.de/home/global/container-seite/kreisverkehr-und-busbahnhof.aspx bis Oktober 2022 gesperrt sein wird, ist die Erfassung der Sperrung an sich richtig. Jedoch hast du durch das Löschen bei manchen Leuten die Alarmglocken etwas klingeln lassen. Wir können von Glück reden, dass diejenigen Mapper, die es bislang bemerkt haben, sorgfältig arbeiten und nicht die "fehlenden" Straßen neu vom Luftbild abzeichnen.

Könntest du daher bitte, um das zu vermeiden den Baustellenbereich als Fläche mit landuse=construction (Baustelle) einzeichnen? Dann weiß jeder, dass dort gebaut wird. Prinzipiell kannst du schon jetzt, spätestens dann, wenn die neuen Konturen sichtbar sind (z.B. Bordsteine gesetzt), auch die neuen Straßenverläufe als highway=construction + construction=residential/footway/service/… einzeichnen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2021-10-12 17:03:05+00:00): Hi,
Du hast in diesem CS (a) den Spitzahorn (node 9049366673) vom Atelier weg, 120m nach Westen verschoben und (b) den POI Cafe im Atelier (node 9054674708) gelöscht. Warum?
BG Robert
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2021-10-24 17:45:02+00:00): Habe die Änderungen revertiert. 
BG Robert
Woazboat (2021-10-29 22:21:27+00:00): Hi,
Wieso hast du denn hier die Fußgängerzone am Hauptplatz entfernt?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3862445

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/3862445

lg, Woazboat
Woazboat (2021-10-29 23:23:40+00:00): Ergänzung: Nicht nur die am Hauptplatz sondern auf quasi allen Plätzen in der Grazer Innenstadt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111900184
dktue (2021-10-01 06:41:04+00:00): Da kein Changeset-Kommentar übermittelt wurde eben als Kommentar: Tübingen Hauptbahnhof als Fläche gemappt
bigbug21 (2022-07-09 10:28:07+00:00): Danke, dktue. Bahnhöfe sollen gerade nicht als Fläche getaggt werden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation). Könntest du den Bahnhof als Punkt bitte wiederherstellen?
Allison P (2022-01-16 20:47:29+00:00): It's not. It was recorded incorrectly on the plat.
NieWnen (2021-10-02 11:31:14+00:00): Dzięki!
user_11418917 (2021-10-05 06:46:11+00:00): You could've just google it, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Boundaries
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111947942
eggie (2021-10-01 17:54:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-26 20:47:57+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3492592 ?
ualios (2023-02-05 17:38:43+00:00): Thanks, wrong tags corrected.
Princess_Aurora (2021-10-03 11:02:56+00:00): Dear Saif alhattali;
Please be aware that you can't use your name in highway names, and if you can please verify the source for these changes.
Regards,
Princess_Aurora
Dodko (2021-10-01 21:28:02+00:00): Adresy sa značia takto
addr:conscriptionnumber=súpisné
addr:housenumber=súpisné/orientačné
addr:streetnumber=orientačné

building=house je pre radovú zástavbu kde je spoločná stena
building=detached je pre samostatný rodinný dom

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:building%3Ddetached
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:building%3Dhouse

Zlatovce sú mestská časť Trenčína preto addr:city=Trenčín a nie Zlatovce.

Celá adresa je
addr:city=Trenčín
addr:conscriptionnumber=2452
addr:country=SK
addr:housenumber=2452/9
addr:postcode=91105
addr:street=Hlavná
addr:streetnumber=9
addr:suburb=Zlatovce
Princess_Aurora (2021-10-03 11:00:53+00:00): Dear Saif alhattali;
Please Stop Adding your name on the streets like:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479832589#map=18/24.63657/54.67308
and boundary
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985864013#map=14/24.6685/54.6658
Regards,
Princess_Aurora
ma-rt-in (2021-10-08 07:15:17+00:00): Hallo Ben,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Es freut mich, das du hier die Hydranten erfasst hast.
Weitere Hilfestellungen findest du im Forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ und im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org

Zu deinen Änderungen habe ich aber eine Anmerkung:
Der Key "name" wird für die Eigennamen der Objekt verwendet. Ein Hydrant hat idR keine Eigennamen, sondern eher ein Referenzwert oder eine Standortbeschreibung. Letzteres trifft bei deinen Änderungen wohl zu,

vg
Martin
tux67 (2021-10-01 08:39:31+00:00): Please make this proof available for the Common OSM Community. 
Is there any on the ground evidence on private access? 
If not this might be not in line with country laws.
Wulf4096 (2021-10-01 14:03:12+00:00): access=private means the owner can drive there with their motor car.

You might have wanted bicycle=no:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73948
https://epaper.zeitungsverlag-aachen.de/2.0/article/2e4adc69b6
SHARCRASH (2021-10-01 14:36:03+00:00): Indeed, please provide the proof as it is becoming more and more common of people ineligibly shutting access with fake "Private property" signs or wanting edits in OSM somehow. Information should be available in government's land registry.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-01 14:50:33+00:00): @Wulf4096 access=private on any kind of highway means any kind of mobility is forbidden because it is a private propriety without any exception. Such tag should not be used in conjunction with other specific means of mobility with value "yes", that would conflict. I see this mistake too often and i know that recently someone in OSM's Wiki added such exception but it's wrong. The simple fact that OSM's Carto layer renders it grey, no matter what extra tag, is proof (and logical). Originally, it was meant without exception.

Also, it's a path, so 4 wheeled vehicles shouldn't be able physically to use such way. 

About Düren, they should inform themselves on how something works before launching a dispute against a company such as Komoot, who actually is not responsible of the map.
tux67 (2021-10-01 14:54:38+00:00): komoot is not responsible for the map, but they are for sure for the tracks they offer ..
tux67 (2021-10-01 14:55:48+00:00): that's why they should not change the map but the stuff they offer within their business model ..
SHARCRASH (2021-10-01 15:30:01+00:00): @tux67 you mean their tours. Let's not confuse with the highway=track. ;)
tux67 (2021-10-01 15:35:54+00:00): yes - they call it routes in the English version of their interface .. which collides of course as well with a meaning in the osm world .. but i think we are on the same page ;-)
Access Claims (komoot) (2021-10-01 16:42:08+00:00): In general, we try to receive enough information from the landowners that contact us about the situation on site. We ask for photos or documents as a proof before we make the changes. However, in this case, we indeed made the change too soon without enough proof and we're sorry for that. We will change the access back to how it was and reach out to the landowner again to provide us with more information.
woodpeck (2021-10-02 16:26:39+00:00): @Sharcrash, the combination "access=private" + "foot=yes" (or "bicycle=yes") is perfectly fine and frequently used in Germany. Don't "fix" that please.
vasony (2021-10-02 05:20:54+00:00): MI a forrás?
Helyben nyoma sincs Darázs utcának.

Tamás
István Szakadát (2021-10-02 06:33:58+00:00): Az utca benne van a BM utcalistájában, de a budaörsi önkormányzat is felsorolja (pl: https://www.budaors.hu/?module=news&action=show&nid=177166). Mind a Bing, mind a Google Map itt mutatja.
vasony (2021-10-02 15:10:35+00:00): Ez rendben, én is ezért mentem el ide tavasszal, de helyszíni bejárás során a Szarvas utcára van számozva minden, tehát a Darázs utca csak elméletben létezik, és ez a mérvardó, úgyhogy visszaírom.
vasony (2021-10-02 15:15:05+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=192543256049138&lat=47.473055555556&lng=18.962777777778&z=17&focus=photo
vasony (2021-10-02 15:15:29+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1003593817115458&lat=47.47333333333299&lng=18.963333333333026&z=17&focus=photo
István Szakadát (2021-10-02 16:24:13+00:00): ok
Frans S (2021-10-01 12:26:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
You mapped here 1 building instead of 2 small buildings.
Please pay attention on these points. 

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111950327
MazAldo (2022-02-15 06:06:38+00:00): Why delete the Ring Road? Its a new road, not yet visible from space.
limes11 (2022-09-03 19:47:33+00:00): Hi, 

what kind of user's feedback was that?

The cinema had already been mapped:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3589380561

So, this changeset creates a duplicate.

Cheers
mosstreet (2021-10-01 10:41:36+00:00): Тег зачем применили
Теперь как с этим тегом вы себе представляете движение по данной трассе
mosstreet (2021-10-01 15:25:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:construction
archpdx (2021-10-01 15:34:59+00:00): Please only use established tags: Google Maps URL and Years In Business aren't used by any service and just adds spam to the map. I recommend you use the OpenStreetMap wiki to learn about what keys to use and the proper formatting of their values. Here are some things I noticed that should be fixed:
1. Payment Types Accepted should be a payment=* tag with formatting shown in https://wiki.osm.org/Key:payment.
2. Hours should be formatted how it's shown in https://wiki.osm.org/Key:opening_hours.
3. Brand should be removed; this is only to be used for branded businesses, not the breed of the dog (ex. McDonald's for McDonald's)
4. language:en should have a value of 'yes' instead of English, English is already implied by the :en suffix
5. linkedin=* should be contact:linkedin=*
6. youtube channel=* should be contact:youtube=*
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111951113
archpdx (2021-10-03 06:20:41+00:00): POI removed due to a lack of response and incorrect location
stillhart (2023-05-28 11:46:48+00:00): Hey captain_slow, weisst du ob dieser Pfad noch gesperrt ist?
captain_slow (2023-05-28 15:48:26+00:00): Das weiss ich leider nicht, sorry.
stillhart (2023-05-28 20:15:19+00:00): Easy, danke für die Antwort 😊
Gianfranco De Rose (2021-10-01 08:42:06+00:00): La località segnalata Guglie del Fumante (7203757203, v2) è piu a NORD comprendendo le Guglie GEI, NEGRIN , SCHIO  ecc
Gianfranco De Rose (2021-10-01 08:45:52+00:00): Lo località invece è stata posta sul versante SUD dell'Obante Guglie del Fumante (7203757203, v2)
kabelhaai (2025-08-10 14:43:26+00:00): Is dit een conciergewoning of ?