piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
redd (2022-02-23 20:09:29+00:00): Hi Emi,
danke für den Hinweis. access=private scheint bisher leider nicht dazu geeignet zu sein, um auch private Stellplätze auf Einfahrten/Grundstücken zu erfassen, da ich gemerkt habe, dass es sowohl openstreetmap.org, als auch OrganicMaps als öffentlichen Parkplatz anzeigt. 
Habe daher die Fläche komplett entfernt.
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:39:56+00:00): cool, bruder.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746089
praeteritum (2022-07-10 21:57:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448415.
Sanniu (2022-02-24 08:15:18+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177336351 is now secondary with residential roads around it. Seems like you search missed ways that have numbers around it.
zstadler (2022-02-24 09:25:32+00:00): Yes. Somone moved the ref tags of nearby roads to the name tag
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:30:07+00:00): Hi, das sieht soweit so gut aus. Das einzige, was mir auffiele ist, dass du in Colmberg einen Hydranten aufs Feld bewegt hast. War das gewollt?  Oder war das ein Versehen?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746272
praeteritum (2022-07-10 21:52:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448295.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 21:47:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123448237.
rafalwlo (2022-02-22 22:43:19+00:00): Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/433934659/history for reference.
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:51:24+00:00): Hi. Could you please explain, why you deleted these forests? Was there a reason behind this?

For now, I'm reverting this.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117746938
user_3022894 (2022-02-28 17:43:48+00:00): Hi,

sorry, hab' nur ganz kurz eine kleine Bitte und zwar:

Falls du nochmal auf ein amenity=telephone stoßen solltest, bei dem eine Aktualisierung vorgeschlagen wird vom iD-Editor: Wäre das in Ordnung für dich, damit noch ein bisschen zu warten? Das Tagging-Schema für den Betreiber "Deutsche Telekom" war im Name-Suggestion-Index (daher kommen die Aktualisierungsvorschläge) noch nicht ausgereift. Hab' das jetzt dort mit ein paar anderen Zuständigen überarbeitet, aber bis alles übernommen wird, wird es noch ein bisschen dauern.

Wir waren uns zunächst nicht ganz einig, wie der "operator" ganz genau getaggt/ausformuliert werden soll.

Dann kannst du dir die 3 bis 4 Änderungssätze für jeden der Telefon-Nodes sparen und es - wenn überhaupt - lieber später in einem Abwasch machen.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:23:18+00:00): Hi, danke für deinen Beitrag. Anstatt solche deskriptiven Namen zu vergeben, probier doch mal die access-Tags!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117747079
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:15:35+00:00): oh btw, i approve of this. nice work, bro
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117747086
ptarac (2022-02-23 07:49:49+00:00): Jeden punkt z paczki był wystrzelony, gdzieś w Rosji :).
Marek-M (2022-02-23 19:52:18+00:00): Cześć, coś nie za bardzo idą Ci te edycje. Zmieniasz budynek Straży Pożarnej na building=fire_station i to jest nawet OK, jeżeli masz wiedzę, że ten budynek został wybudowany jako budynek Straży Pożarnej - ale nie zawsze tak jest - czasami OSP mieści się np. w starym garażu, więc taka zmiana nie jest już ok.

Jednak dużym błędem jest usuwanie z obiektu tagowania amenity=fire_station - jest to bardzo duży błąd. Akurat aktualizowałeś moją okolicę i aż zmarnowałem kilka minut, żeby odnaleźć usunięty węzeł z OSP Żukowo. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9125638221

Proszę tak tego nie rób! W kilku miejscach już widziałem taki błąd podczas importu danych z tabeli AED i poprawiam po Tobie.

Pamiętaj, że tag *amenity=fire_station* jest o wiele ważniejszy niż building=fire_station
ptarac (2022-02-23 20:10:58+00:00): Ok.
Rozumiem.
Dzięki.
Marek-M (2022-02-24 09:08:40+00:00): Cześć, jeszcze jedna uwaga - z tego co się orientuję, to w sytuacji, gdy np. w jednej remizie są dwa samochody z AED, to należy dodawać oddzielnie dwa AED w OSM. Czy znasz to ustalenie? W jakiejś OSP (nie pamiętam w której) mimo dwóch wierszy w tabelce dodałeś tylko jedno AED.

Na to też proszę zwracaj uwagę :)
ptarac (2022-02-24 09:18:06+00:00): Cześć,
znam to ustalenie. I jeśli mam dane to tak robie. Ja dostaje paczkę pod josm. Tam takich danych nie ma. Nie mam dostępu do tabeli...
Jak robiłem lokalizacje z Gminy Dobra (Szczecińska) to np. straż gminna ma dwa AED (jeden w siedzibie i ten był w paczce, drugi w samochodzie - info wygrzebałem w necie). Tak samo z policją w Wołczkowie (gmina jak wyżej). 
Staram się to ogarnąć i nie ograniczam się tylko do tego co dostaje do wprowadzenia. Weryfikuje te dane. Staram się jak najlepiej dopasować lokalizację AED w oparciu o reaserch w necie.
Sam dodałem 99% urządzeń z Gminy Goleniów. Przed paczką ogarnąłem też Gminę Dobra (Szczecińska). Strama się jak mogę ale pewnych rzeczy nie przeskoczę.

Pozdrawiam :).
b.
Marek-M (2022-02-24 09:29:50+00:00): Ok, pewnie w tabeli współrzędne dla obu AED były takie same i wtedy JOSM traktuje takie obiekty jako jeden. Zabrakł pewnej weryfikacji na etapie tworzenia danych do JOSM. Spróbuję dorzucić formułę weryfikującą duplikaty we współrzędnych w tej tabeli Cristoffsa :)
Dzięki za info i powodzenia! :)
ptarac (2022-02-24 10:23:02+00:00): Taka weryfikacja byłaby super :)
ZLima12 (2022-03-28 02:31:21+00:00): Thanks for cleaning up. The value you put in name might be better in official_name, though.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117747272
Emilius123 (2022-02-22 23:46:14+00:00): Hi. In the turn relation you have added here, you seem to have forgotten your "from" and "to" members.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117747290
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-02-23 00:38:39+00:00): Fixed, sorry!
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 00:42:30+00:00): No need to apologize, thank you for the quick fix!
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 01:13:30+00:00): Mostly good, though it seems some DID exist, being just not residential, but track. Could you please double-check?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117748259
txemt (2022-02-23 01:17:43+00:00): I'm actively working this area. I'll go back and look. There may have been one or two minor mistakes.
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 01:23:59+00:00): Allright, thank you.
nevw (2022-07-10 11:51:39+00:00): Hi
water=shallow is not a recognised tag as far as I know. Maybe natural=shoal is what you are trying to tag 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshoal
mikko_tamura (2022-02-23 02:07:58+00:00): If applicable please square your buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117748602
AnuradhaRajanayake (2022-02-23 05:21:32+00:00): Those are not square-type buildings. Those are water tanks. I have removed it. Thanks for your comment
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117748602
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 01:11:36+00:00): bruh, you dont even get paid for this

#2: Thanks for your contributions. Are the deletions of name and destination:ref tags intentional?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117748651
orthocircular (2022-10-27 21:21:41+00:00): The buildings in the middle of the SSHS track/field no longer seem to be there, were they temporary?
archpdx (2022-10-27 22:34:27+00:00): I think so, it looks like Maxar imagery was captured while the new SSHS building was under construction
tastrax (2022-02-28 05:55:53+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Viajero Perdido (2022-08-03 05:26:11+00:00): Hi.  You changed a peak name to "Jap Mountain".  Where does this name come from?
exploringthemountains (2022-08-11 03:28:14+00:00): This is the unofficial name used by locals as I was told by several people when I visited the area. It is also used in official publications by the Alberta Wilderness Association. See https://albertawilderness.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/200309_book_bh_bighorn_wildland.pdf and search for "Jap Mountain". Also see https://albertawilderness.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/19860000_book_awa_Eastern_Slopes_Wildlands.pdf and see map on page 46.
Viajero Perdido (2022-08-11 20:40:30+00:00): Hi.  Thank you for clarifying.  Had you included this info when you made the change (source), I'd have left it alone.

Given that the previous name in OSM was Japanese-sounding (also unattributed), it was easy to assume this renaming was a quick derogatory shot.

I already removed the name (since no attribution was given for any of the names it's had), but you're welcome to add it again, with attribution.  That'll discourage others from changing it.  I won't get involved (further, argh) in name wars...  Cheers.
Viajero Perdido (2022-08-11 21:15:50+00:00): PS, OSM supports multiple names, useful for searching.  Eg old_name, alt_name, official_name, etc.  (There's no official name according to CanVec, BTW).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
exploringthemountains (2022-08-12 20:44:53+00:00): Thanks for the info. I will add it again with attribution. This was my first time doing editing/correcting on here so I'll keep that in mind for future edits.
adrianojbr (2022-03-20 22:55:33+00:00): Olá, PlayzinhoAgro! Para lembrar que quando se tratar de estrada, a etiqueta para CEP é postal_code=*. A addr:postcode=* vai em áreas ou pontos, por se referir a endereços.
ElliottPlack (2022-02-23 14:20:45+00:00): Hi there, it looks like you are doing some boundary mapping or editing. Could you be clearer in your changeset descriptions? Try to make every comment unique, e.g., what detailed areas are you adding? I don't see any adds here, only updates.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please respond to confirm receipt.

-- Elliott  
OSMF Data Working Group
FlowerHillPerson (2022-03-10 15:44:41+00:00): Hi again. Once again, I apologize for not responding in a quicker manner. I have been trying to respond to this message since you first sent it, and so I am glad that I now know how to do so. Ever since you sent me this message, I have been making summaries of changesets which are clearer and more detailed. I will continue to do this and try making them more unique from one another. You are right that it can become confusing and that I need to be more descriptive, and so I will be sure to do so going forward. Thank you.
Ray29 (2022-02-23 03:03:48+00:00): Ment to say no longer exists
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-21 20:40:10+00:00): Do not use "name=*" fields to add descriptive names to the features.  Only their true official name should be added.  Descriptive items should go into the appropriate tag fields.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-23 11:22:26+00:00): Please explain why is this "wrong". There is already an `alt_name=`. Don't remove from the `=ridge` either.
user_3643552 (2022-02-25 02:10:23+00:00): I have provided the online reference to explain why it is wrong. Please refer to the online details, https://www.sankala.hk/2017/03/20170226.html

Prove me if I am wrong. This is not the problem of alternative name or the formal name. This is actually the problem of nomenclature error by misplacing the real Cheung Shan to another one next to it. Thanks
Kovoschiz (2022-02-25 11:38:39+00:00): Please understand `name=` is reflecting a common name, not what you think should be correct or proper. You should not prove anything is wrong, unless it is not used by anyone.
Tommybara (2023-11-05 00:17:45+00:00): See my previous comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66050656 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107233829

In order to prevent him from restoring the false information about this location, I had to delete both the node and the relation to recreate the new ones.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-25 21:11:34+00:00): Please to not duplicate water features.
If existing water features don't show up in your export program please file a bug report.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117750142
Supaplex (2022-02-23 05:15:19+00:00): Hi, 
Could you explain the change of road name? It seems non-sense to me or other local Taiwanese
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117750566
Allison P (2022-02-23 05:00:08+00:00): Wow. It's been a long time since such a large portion of a street was vacated. o7
chris66 (2022-04-30 13:29:47+00:00): Hier befindet sich in Realität kein Tor.
bathines (2022-05-02 15:36:14+00:00): Hi Chris,
Thanks for the feedback. I have added a gate based on the internal driver feedback. Thank you for correcting the edit and making necessary changes. 
Thanks and Regards,
bathines
AngocA (2022-03-06 03:40:11+00:00): Hola Facalderonm. Veo que borraste  varios nodos, y dejaste muchas relaciones inconsistentes.
 Qué tipo de corrección de datos se hizo? ya que la zona quedó con muchos errores en relaciones.
AngocA (2022-03-06 03:40:46+00:00): Un ejemplo es esta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12338150
Allison P (2022-02-23 08:06:23+00:00): Congratulations on version 100 of the Greenbelt!
Lee Carré (2022-02-26 10:52:38+00:00): Since I'm having difficulty loading this changeset in any analysis tool (see http://osmcha.org/changesets/117752030/ or http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117752030 ), probably due to the size of it (both area of the bbox & count of changed elements); which element in Jersey was changed as part of this set (according to http://tyrasd.github.io/latest-changes/#12/49.2/-2.1 )?
Lee Carré (2022-02-26 11:01:45+00:00): Was http://www.osm.org/node/1804845200 the only Jersey element?

What's the source for the name change?
Max-Kritic (2022-02-27 06:48:32+00:00): Yes. Osmose.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-27 07:47:12+00:00): Osmose on its own is not a source. What change did you actually make?
Max-Kritic (2022-02-27 19:20:06+00:00): Des corrections diverses que propose avec Osmose.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-27 19:31:42+00:00): > Des corrections diverses que propose avec Osmose.

This is not OK.  Osmose only makes suggestions.  You need to check each one one at a time to make sure that what is being suggested is valid.  I regularly see Osmose suggestions when editing with Vespucci, and a high percentage of those (30-50% locally?) are false positives.

I'll have to revert these since we already know that there were some basic language change errors made by you as a result.  If you can be more specific about what changes were made in what changesets then perhaps I may be able to exclude some from the revert.

- Andy (from the DWG)
SomeoneElse (2022-02-27 19:32:05+00:00): > Des corrections diverses que proposent avec Osmose.

Ce n'est pas correct. Osmose ne fait que des suggestions. Vous devez vérifier chacun d'eux à la fois pour vous assurer que ce qui est suggéré est valide. Je vois régulièrement des suggestions d'Osmose lors de l'édition avec Vespucci, et un pourcentage élevé d'entre elles (30 à 50 % localement ?) Sont des faux positifs.

Je vais devoir les annuler car nous savons déjà que vous avez commis des erreurs de base en matière de changement de langue. Si vous pouvez être plus précis sur les modifications apportées à quels ensembles de modifications, je pourrai peut-être en exclure certaines du retour.

- Andy (du DWG)
Lee Carré (2022-03-01 11:14:52+00:00): “Yes.” [re node #1804845200]

Thankyou for the confirmation.

“Osmose on its own is not a source.” & “Osmose only makes suggestions.”

That was my concern, too. Particularly since the name for the Jersey element (shop=jewelry) was added via survey (someone using StreetComplete); see http://www.osm.org/changeset/79268662 .

So, even if Osmose were (somehow) a valid source, it still wouldn't trump a survey.

I'll see if I can resurvey (as if I don't already have enough to do (as the lone surveyor) on this rock(!); drive-by changes by those in far-away armchairs (even if well meaning) become tedious); the signage outside that retailer is quite bold. I vaguely recall it being somewhat ambiguous re if there was a space after the “H.”.
it'll probably have to wait until after the weather clears, though.

As I've had to state to others; uniformity comes second to correctness / accuracy. I value a neat & tidy dataset as much as the next guy, but OSM must represent what's actually on the ground.
If QA tools are making poor suggestions, then help to refine the tools, instead of mangling data.

Separately; thankyou, Andy, for the bilingual response. My French is beyond rusty (and probably useless for technical discussion).
Thanks for also doing yet more clean-up, once again. Some of us appreciate the DWG 🙂.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-01 11:20:15+00:00): A revert of where _only_ osmose was used was started in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117961003 and is ongoing.
Max_Kritic is currently blocked from the API for a short time in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5727 for ignoring requests not to use _only_ osmose.
Lee Carré (2022-03-01 11:25:41+00:00): “What change did [Max] actually make?”

For that element, seems to have only been the name tag, thus; s/^H\.Samuel$/H. Samuel/ (literally inserting a space between the initial & the last word).
Honey Fombuena (2022-02-23 06:35:35+00:00): Hello! Please remove the shop=yes tag on the building since the tag is also included on the POIs inside it, you may replace building = yes to building = commercial to join the two information you provided. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117753303
JeroenHoek (2022-02-23 12:18:32+00:00): These ways are inside of a holiday park. They are not public roads. That makes them highway=service at best.
C_nav (2022-02-24 12:36:53+00:00): Thanks JeroenHoek, I’ve changed the classification to service.
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 10:46:59+00:00): Bitte, erkläre! Was hast du gegen Gärten? Die waren vollkommen ok!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117754023
PCarew_EG (2022-10-11 19:05:57+00:00): Hello, the wikidata ID added to this feature is for a different location, would you mind reviewing it?
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 10:44:22+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your contribution.

You seem to have deleted many things here. As you stated, you are "in progress", so you are replacing those, right?

Please bear in mind that deleting and replacing is not really the same as just changing the existing.

Changing the existing and keeping the history is important, please always try to do that.



Thank you for your understanding.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117755142
trial (2022-02-23 12:36:43+00:00): Bonjour et bienenu dans OpenStreetMap.
Quelques remarques : iD vous/te permet de rendre les barres rectangulaires (sélectionner l'objet et taper Q ou utiliser le menu).
De même l'aire de sport peut être arrondie avec 0.
J'ai aussi vu une erreur : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034390042/history : Aire de sport n'est pas un nom propre mais une description, c'est donc à supprimer. La description vous/tu l'avez/as faite avec des attributs.
Je vous/te laisse faire les modifications.
Honey Fombuena (2022-02-23 09:09:08+00:00): Hello! We can use building=roof for fuel refilling stations :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117756606
VISHNU K C (2022-02-23 09:16:18+00:00): Ok so should I revert my edit?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117756606
Honey Fombuena (2022-02-23 10:04:30+00:00): Yes, you may revert it and just change building=yes to building=roof. Thank you!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117756606
Dodko (2022-02-23 08:09:46+00:00): Môže sa tam dať značka
highway=service
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dservice

a odstrániť
bicycle 	yes
foot 	yes
horse 	yes
motor_vehicle 	yes
tracktype 	grade1

lebo po takej ceste všetci uvedený môžu ísť a po lesnej mohli ísť aj chodci aj bicykle preto sa nedávajú tie značky.
rufo123 (2022-02-24 08:55:58+00:00): Zmenené, ďakujem.
user_5359 (2022-03-05 19:05:25+00:00): Hello! What is the eaning of the key Crop?
Dodko (2022-02-23 09:10:57+00:00): Adresa je už uložená v budove, navigácie si to preberú odtiaľ.
Nie je potrebné ju duplicitne dávať aj do objektu POI ktorý je umiestnneý nad budovou.
Vhodnejšie je tam doplniť webstránku https://www.tts-steel.sk/ mail/telefón.
rufo123 (2022-02-24 08:55:33+00:00): Jasné, rozumiem. Pomenil som to... Ďakujem.
TopoGeeK (2022-02-23 08:10:10+00:00): Bonjour.
Je souhaiterais revenir sur certaines suppressions de tronçons de route que j'ai effecté. 
Comment faire pour annuler certaines actions ?
H@mlet (2022-02-24 19:45:14+00:00): Bonjour,
la documentation générale à ce sujet : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Annulation_des_modifications
En espérant que ce soit utile.
Sinon https://help.openstreetmap.org/ est un bon endroit pour poser des questions.
Cordialement.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-02-24 05:11:34+00:00): Is this really an aerodrome? Satellite images show only rogh terrain, no runway, no hangar, ...?
Warin61 (2022-02-23 22:00:59+00:00): The website for Sorrento Park is https://www.mornpen.vic.gov.au/Activities/Parks-Reserves/Parks-Recreation/Sorrento-Park 
Please try to prioritize the official websites of the operators.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-23 10:26:44+00:00): Pomysł zmapowania dojazdu od północy też dobry - może warto poczekać bo czasem czas aktualizacji nawigacji to tydzień-dwa (OSM nie ma na to wpływu, dane są co minutę publikowane)
ameziol (2022-02-23 08:18:16+00:00): przejście jest częścią tymczasowych zmian wprowadzonych na 30 dni pół roku temu ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2844269 ), ale ani nie usuwają, ani nie malują żółtych linii na biało i tak sobie jest od września
MatthieuMartin (2022-03-09 20:07:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Les noms dans OSM sont à renseingner sans abbréviations.

Voir : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Normes_et_conventions_d%27%C3%A9dition#Noms_des_routes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809307758/history

Cordialement,
Honey Fombuena (2022-02-23 08:47:31+00:00): Hello! Please confirm if shop=shoes should be the appropriate tag. Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117757681
Emilius123 (2022-02-23 10:42:07+00:00): Found this right before me. You using OSMCha too?
Le_Nico (2022-03-08 10:32:24+00:00): I'll be using it from now on :)
user_5359 (2022-03-08 09:49:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/508057745. What is the meaning of the tag gost_7 = РОФ-МАГ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.