piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-07-23 21:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
Truchin (2018-12-06 16:23:59+00:00): Je me demande quel est ton critère de basculement rivière/ruisseau ? Le wiki n'est pas très explicite à ce sujet.
wuff57 (2018-12-07 16:50:54+00:00): Not sure what you are refering to, as I made a number of changes in this change set. If you mean the course of l'Elnon: I used the BD Carthage layer in JOSM. Please check also the note that I added in the relation. If you meant something else, please give me a specific way as an example.
wuff57 (2018-12-08 21:55:49+00:00): It just occurred to me that you may be referring to the difference between waterway=stream and waterway=river. The French OSM wiki is not really specific about it. The English version is more specific: "the commonly accepted rule for OpenStreetMap is that a stream can be jumped across by an active, able-bodied person", but still there is a lot of judgement when you base your mapping on satellite pictures.
Truchin (2018-12-10 09:12:11+00:00): Oui c'est cela.
En pratique, un "courant" est un ruisseau pour des français. Donc je pense qu'il faudrait élever quelque peu ton critère de passage de ruisseau à rivière. Ou simplement te référer à la BD Carthage qui comporte une classification de ce type.
Bonne continuation
wuff57 (2018-12-11 15:54:58+00:00): You mentioned BD Carthage for the distinction between waterway=stream vs. river. I only have a rough understanding of BD Carthage. I'm grateful if you could tell me where exactly this can be found. I am only aware of the CLASSE field which expresses the length of the "cours d'eau", while "stream" and "river" are rather about the width of the waterway.
Truchin (2018-12-11 17:43:42+00:00): Je comprends mieux l'allemand que l'anglais....
J'avoue me baser sur les représentations habituelles de la BD Ortho http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=12&lat=47.7643&lon=0.46378&layers=00B0000FTFFFF ou des cartes d'état major. Franchement, la largeur n'est pas un critère suffisant pour faire la différence entre rivière et ruisseau
viloan (2018-12-06 12:56:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Alecs01 (2018-12-06 19:36:29+00:00): Non è possibile copiare da mappe protette da copyright, queste modifiche vanno annullate.
IgorEliezer (2018-12-06 19:27:26+00:00): OSM não só mostra as vias públicas, mas todas incluindo as privadas, como no Google Maps.
Quando o objeto tem acesso restrito, clique nele e no painel vá ao campo "Acesso permitido", e em "Todos" escolha "private" (acesso só de pessoas autorizadas) ou "permissive" (particular mas o acesso é aberto).
Se parte da via tem acesso restrito, corte primeiro e aplique a alteração.
djsa (2023-09-02 12:26:55+00:00): U heeft hier de Rozendaelweg H108 toegevoegd, maar het lijkt dat hier geen pad/weg is, enkel een greppel tussen velden. Op wat was dit gebaseerd?
Phyks (2018-12-06 15:55:06+00:00): Bonjour,

Le champ "note" sert à donner des indications aux autres contributeurs, il n'est pas utilisé par les applications pour donner plus d'informations (ce serait plutôt le champ "description").

Tel que modifié ici, le gymnase est marqué pour un seul sport (le volley). Est-ce vraiment le cas ou est-ce un gymnase multisport ?

Concernant l'"US CAGNES VOLLEY-BALL", est-ce une association de volley ? Dans ce cas, il serait probablement mieux de mettre les informations sur un nœud placé à l'intérieur du gymnase.

N'hésitez pas si mes remarques ne sont pas claires,
Bonne journée,
whoetbe (2019-01-21 08:34:21+00:00): tout est clair, ça parait évident même..
c'est un gymnase multisports qui sert la journée au collège Jules Verne et le soir et week-end exclusivement au club de volley US CAGNES Volley-Ball.
Phyks (2019-01-21 08:39:16+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est un gymnase multisports, donc le gymnase (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63865383) devrait être en sport=multi et non sport=volleyball.

Le champ note sert uniquement à donner des indications aux autres contributeurs. Le nom "US CAGNES VOLLEY-BALL" est inutilisable à cet endroit et n'apparaîtra jamais sur les fonds de carte ou dans les applications. La bonne façon de noter ça serait de mettre un nouveau nœud (point) à l'intérieur du gymnase avec les informations

name=US CAGNES VOLLEY-BALL
club=sport
port=volleyball

(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club)

et éventuellement les informations de contact, horaires, site web etc.

N'hésitez pas à me faire signe si besoin d'informations complémentaires sur ce message,
hfwri (2018-12-07 08:50:10+00:00): Schade, diese Änderung hat die Verbindung 29-47 zerstört. Warum meldest du dich nicht auf meine Anfragen?
vogelfreier (2018-12-08 10:42:32+00:00): meine Routenverbindung von Hordel 47 nach Jahrhunderthalle 29 oder radeln nach zahlen wiederhergestellt -> neue Verbindung darauf erstellt relation/9087748
M_Kucha (2018-12-10 09:51:04+00:00): Hallo vogelfreier,

Danke für den Hinweis, wenn ich das richtig nachvollziehen konnte, habe ich wohl einige Tags für meine neu erstellte Route 29-77 in deine existierende 29-47 geschrieben. Dank Dir für Deine schnelle Korrektur, ich habe wohl schon zu lange nicht mehr mit Routenrelationen in JOSM gearbeitet, dass mir ein solcher Amfängerfehler unterlief. Da ich mich nach längerer Pause wieder in die Pflege des Knotenpunkt radrevier.ruhr einbringen wollte, werden wir wohl in nächster Zeit "miteinander mappen".  Sprech mich bitte wieder an oder korriegiere zeitnah, wenn weitere Abstimmungen nötig sein sollten. Ich beabsichtige, mich in nächster Zeit mal wieder um die dazugehörige WIKI-Seite zu kümmern und wollte dann alle an radrevier.ruhr aktiven Mapper anschreiben. Zwei davon, Kevin (r3d3) und mich, Martin (M_Kucha) trifft man im übrigen beim Dortmunder Stammtisch, das nächste mal am Freitag, der 14. Dezember 2018 ab 19:00 Uhr im PING e.V. Vereinsheim, Zum Nubbental 11.

Gruß Martin
Jakka (2018-12-06 15:15:15+00:00): graag bevestiging van deze changeset: een brug track gravel? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367451566
andrewwiseman (2018-12-10 23:56:28+00:00): Hi, similar questions here, I think the unpaved tags are good, thanks! But some of the classification changes are taking out what seems like the main part of the network in this area, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652003461#map=16/-10.1531/33.5474 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620362206#map=16/-10.1564/33.5672

Is there a local highway tracing guide you're using or other source?
rab (2018-12-16 13:14:39+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OSPFZsTLr-QbJjLSUT3ZTRm08OdoH__T/view
muralito (2019-01-02 14:54:04+00:00): Hola lboltshauser
¿El paso peatonal también fue cortado?
¿O corresponde dibujar tramos de footway?
lboltshauser (2019-01-02 15:10:20+00:00): Hola! El paso peatonal no fue cortado
muralito (2019-01-02 17:25:45+00:00): OK. Hay que dejar un footway entonces. Tener en cuenta que OSM no solo es para vehiculos.
Phyks (2018-12-06 18:10:25+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM,

Il serait probablement utile de préciser "office=company" (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:office) sur le point pour préciser qu'il s'agit des bureaux de l'entreprise ajoutée.

Bonne soirée,
andrewwiseman (2018-12-10 23:54:29+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits. It looks like you are changing some things to track, which classification guide are you using? Is it part of validating for HOT tasks? For example, I think these two should probably be unclassified as they are the biggest road around and pretty long, not just for farm use. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588748741#map=17/-10.13859/33.43089 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652016366#map=15/-10.1301/33.4486 -- plus then it suddenly changes, so it's inconsistent. Thanks!
rab (2018-12-16 13:09:54+00:00): imo too narrow for a unclassified highway. As a remote mapper I would decide like Michiel M. Way 588748741 looks in my eyes even more like a path. The nearby border  makes tagging even more complicated
andrewwiseman (2018-12-18 00:06:20+00:00): I see your point, but I think in this case making all the side roads into tracks kind of eliminates the network element of things, it's harder to see which might be the main ways of travel. In my opinion those ways above and a few others are larger than the rest of the tracks. It also results in a lot of inconsistency, like here, where roads change classification and there are tiny chunks: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-10.1590/33.4339

Let me know what you think. Thanks.
rab (2018-12-18 13:50:14+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_vehicles_per_capita
No cars, no unclassified roads. Inconsistent tagging is typical for HOT activities. What I sometimes do is filter by road type and length. And then simply remove the selection. Afterwards the remaining roads can be reworked and formed into a network.
gurglypipe (2018-12-06 16:07:33+00:00): Wow, where’d you get all this data from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65241373
szalona_entropia (2018-12-06 19:40:13+00:00): A dlaczego nie może być trunk?
forestus (2018-12-06 21:26:51+00:00): Cześć, droga nie ma statusu drogi ekspresowej, jest oznakowana jako zwykła krajówka DK16. Dziś nią jechałem i widać pewne ograniczenia (wąski pas dzielący, rondo zamiast węzła). Zgodnie z zasadami społeczności, które obecnie obowiązują to jest primary. Jeśli zmienią sie zasady w innych częściach kraju to ma sens, robiąc trunk - robimy bałagan. Pozdrawiam. Szymon.
szalona_entropia (2018-12-09 10:31:35+00:00): Jeśli chodzi o parametry techniczne to w gruncie rzeczy ta droga niczym się nie różni od pozostałego odcinka obwodnicy. Parametry są takie same, różnica polega tylko na tym, że wschodni odcinek został wpisany do rozporządzenia dot. sieci autostrad, a zachodni nie. Ale to nie powinno mieć wpływu na tagowanie highway
forestus (2018-12-09 10:35:09+00:00): No to zmień na trunk, skoro to tak istotne.  Nie będę tego ruszał. Pozdrawiam!
maraf24 (2018-12-10 09:22:17+00:00): Dla jasności: trunk nie oznacza drogi ekspresowej, ale drogi ekspresowe tagujemy  jako trunk.
Otenkiya (2018-12-08 09:36:03+00:00): name タグはユーザーの閲覧用です。編集に関する注はnoteをお使いください。また編集の際には各種リレーションに注意を払い、誤って破壊した場合は巻き戻すようお願いします。
Владимир К (2018-12-07 10:16:04+00:00): В названии необходимо оставить только "Шалуны" без капса, детскую одежду в тег типа clothes=child.
freebeer (2018-12-09 09:53:27+00:00): Hallo RuckRunnerGRT,

Thanks for your contributions to OSM.  I noticed your name when I was recovering damage caused by the Humanoid's earlier manifestation.

Is this user personally known to you?  I am going to assume yes, in which case I will purposely turn a blind eye to the normally-taboo tone of your comment, as in general we like to treat co-mappers and cow-orkers with respect, regardless of whether it is earned or not.

When they turn to the dark side and deliberately damage the map, then I see no need to adhere strictly to these not-yet-set-in-stone guidelines, although so far this particular user seems to be behaving, locally, so overall it is a Win all around.

Carry on.
dval (2019-03-05 04:48:26+00:00): Здравствуйте! Валидатор редактора JOSM говорит, что есть десятки случаев одинаковых адресов (например, Заводская, 1 и проч.), часто расположенных достаточно далеко друг от друга, присвоенных зданиям Вашими усилиями. С этим надо что-то делать.
pyram (2019-01-04 18:22:17+00:00): Review:
Schaut im Großen und Ganzen gut aus. Ich habe die Umrisse einiger Gebäude nacherfasst ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1639379 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1639378 ), die kann man auf "DigitalGlobe Standard" ganz gut erkennen.
Bei der Johanneskirche sollte man aber nicht Kontaktangaben machen. Anrufen kann man die Kirche nicht, sondern das entsprechende Pfarrbüro ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4078292947 ). Wenn die Lage genauer bekannt ist, dann den Punkt einfach dorthin verschieben ;-)
Danke für's mithelfen.

Gruß
pyram
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
baspng (2018-12-08 16:20:10+00:00): Por que usar addr:interpolation quando o endereço está definido (número e rua definidos)?
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-12-06 16:15:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-12-06 16:17:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Phyks (2018-12-06 21:50:26+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM,

Le laboratoire médical devrait plutôt être taggé avec

healthcare	laboratory	
healthcare:speciality	biology

que amenity=doctors je pense. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Ddoctors et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:healthcare%3Dlaboratory.

Par ailleurs, il est possible de rajouter son numéro FINESS aussi (une base de données ouvertes). Je crois que c'est http://finess.sante.gouv.fr/fininter/jsp/actionDetailEtablissement.do?noFiness=600012124. Dans ce cas, l'attribut à rajouter est

ref:FR:FINESS	600012124

Bonne soirée !
Phyks (2018-12-06 21:51:30+00:00): Bonjour,

Les modifications me semblent correctes. Concernant le fleuriste, vous pouvez également compléter le nom et les informations de contact (téléphone, site web par exemple) ou les horaires d'ouverture si vous les connaissez. :)

Bonne soirée,
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:53:10+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
muralito (2018-12-06 16:54:06+00:00): Hola. Cambiando de avenida a solo ciclovia. ¿Se prohibió el trafico de vehículos por la diagonal 73?
Laberne (2018-12-07 12:59:21+00:00): La vía de Diagonal 73 mantiene un carril por sentido, sólo se incorporó una bicisenda en rambla central. Lo harías de otra manera?
muralito (2018-12-07 13:31:20+00:00): Probablemente no fuera este el cambio donde quise poner el comentario, pero se cambiaron varias calles de secondary a cycleway y eso no esta bien salvo que solo se permitan bicicletas y no vehiculos a motor.

Tambien puede haber otro tema con la terminologia. Una via separada fisicamente de la calzada (en la rambla central u a un costado) no seria una bicisenda, sino una ciclovia, y ahi si esta bien mapearla como "highway=cycleway". Bicisenda es una senda en la calzada.

Si es una senda parte de la calzada, sin separacion fisica es el "highway" como estaba antes y a ese misma via se le agrega el "cycleway=lane" (o alguna variante que describe la posicion).

Si es calle compartida, autos y bicis sin ningun tipo de separacion, ni siquiera pintura en la calle (son las que debieran tener lopgos de bici pintados, y velocidad maxima reducida), va la via con el "highway" que tenia, y se le agrega el cycleway=shared_lane.
Laberne (2018-12-07 13:44:10+00:00): Entonces en tu terminología: 
En D73
- Incorporamos una via segregada sobre rambla central (ciclovia)
-D73 no tiene cyclelane
Por favor corrobora si es correcto o indícanos como hacerlo.
Gracias
muralito (2018-12-07 13:58:27+00:00): Si, ahora está correcto. Esta via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287559788 esta bien con highway=cycleway y las existente (ej https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/308311817 ) con highway=secondary (o podria ser otro valor de highway pero uno que permita circulacion de vehiculos a motor, el highway=cycleway no los permite)
Phyks (2018-12-06 21:52:27+00:00): Bonjour,

Si les tennis sont couverts, je pense que vous pouvez rajouter "covered=yes" dessus pour l'indiquer dans OSM.

Bonne soirée,
SK53 (2018-12-06 16:46:05+00:00): Ah, you beat me to it. I hadn't uploaded my changes because I think the edits to Chestal, Victoria Close & Long Street look odd (Chestal has been diverted from a line of buildings where the stream runs
SK53 (2018-12-06 17:08:29+00:00): Finally found some basis for changes http://www.dursleyglos.org.uk/html/dursley/news/jul_2018/long_street_clearance_9jul2018.htm
SK53 (2018-12-06 17:09:46+00:00): and this suggests (as I thought) that Chestal is now in wrong place
spiregrain (2018-12-06 17:35:25+00:00): Agreed- the road layout just doesn't match the aerial imagery.   I have actually been here (following the Cotswolds Way on foot); sadly, it was 3 years ago, and I didn't notice the discrepancy.
spiregrain (2018-12-06 17:41:34+00:00): Have added a Note.   Hopefully some local person will sort it.
spiregrain (2021-04-15 09:15:16+00:00): Better images now available; a way has been added (w837353269) to show old road alignment as a warning.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
L'imaginaire (2018-12-06 22:02:47+00:00): Bedankt!
Ik heb nog een paar details aangepast in wijzigingenset 65252636. De tag oneway:moped_B=-1 op de Minnemeersbrug heb ik laten staan, maar die snap ik niet echt.
JoL (2018-12-13 13:56:33+00:00): Bedankt, ik was inderdaad op diverse plaatsen vergeten de oneway=no voor fietsers te plaatsen.
tux67 (2018-12-06 20:53:39+00:00): Hier würde ich denken das ist gemäß https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Dgovernment
office=government + government=register_office und government=archive .. 

Gruß
Stephan
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65245132
user_3716049 (2018-12-09 17:13:08+00:00): Danke für die Fehlerkorrektur. Sollte wohl besser statt spontan aus den Vorlagen das für mich naheliegendste auszuwählen vorher mal im Wiki suchen.

Gruß Marcel
tux67 (2018-12-09 21:52:35+00:00): Berichtigt hab' ich noch nix .. das wollte ich deinen fähigen Händen überlassen ... btw. dann könntest du auch das "e" am Ende von Stadtarchiv einsparen .. ;-)
freebeer (2018-12-19 17:34:43+00:00): Hallo, lyft mapping team.

may i ask, what tool(s) are you using to identify and locate broken relations?

and how is the migration to editor JOSM in place of iD going?  i see iD is still being used by the last edits of your team to have caught my eye.

yhanks
Karisa (2018-12-07 14:28:16+00:00): Hallo Prielip,

schön dass Du mit dem mappen angefangen hast.

Bei dieser Änderung hast Du zwei auf dem Bing Luftbild sehr gut sichtbare Hecken entfernt und das mit Teilgebäden gut modellierte Haus durch eine recht schräge Umrandung ersetzt.

Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob diese Änderungen so gewollt waren - darum frage ich erst einmal hier im Changeset nach.
Wenn es ein Fehler war, kann man diesen recht einfach wieder zurücknehmen lassen.

Eine Straße hast Du in dieser Änderung  nicht hinzugefügt, der Changeset-Kommentar passt somit nicht.

Gruß, Karisa
Prielip (2018-12-07 18:46:46+00:00): Hallo Karisa,
ich weiß nicht, wie alt das Bing-Luftbild ist. Aber die in meiner Umgebung eingetragenen Details stimmen mit der Wirklichkeit nun nicht überein. Ich wohne hier und woher kommst Du?
Es ist noch einiges zu ändern.
Gruß