piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-05-01 15:14:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
VIGNERON (2019-05-10 09:39:53+00:00): Seems to be vandalism
Dimacn (2019-05-02 08:06:53+00:00): У вас ошибка. Вы отметили жилой квартал как парковку. Пожалуйста верните landuse=residential
5m4u9 (2019-05-04 17:25:08+00:00): he revertido la eliminación porque personalmente vi que existe de color amarillo puesto por la gobernación... han puesto en varias cuidades de cochabamba...
mtchk (2019-05-02 10:46:41+00:00): В данном случае название не нужно указывать, тег этой poi подразумевает, что это "место для кемпинга"
Name только для официальных или устоявшихся названий
yellowsoar (2019-05-31 17:04:41+00:00): 這個底圖的授權有不符合 OSM 的授權條款嗎？
yellowsoar (2019-05-31 17:06:08+00:00): 這個底圖的授權有符合 OSM 的授權條款嗎？
Kiekin (2019-06-18 06:54:33+00:00): Warum einen Weg eintragen, den es nicht mehr gibt? Dann eher als abandoned:highway=track
whb (2019-08-29 08:45:27+00:00): Zu deiner Notiz
"Nr. 9 steht am Haus, LGL ist mit Sicherheit falsch."
an diesem Haus https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220068384/history :
Ich bin an diesem Haus vorbei gefahren, dort steht tatsächlich eine 9 am südwestlichen Eck des Hauses.
Allerdings befindet sich darunter ein Pfeil nach links (Richtung Westen).
Dieser soll möglicherweise andeuten, dass sich die Nummer 9 links im Innenhof befindet und das Haus selbst nicht diese Nummer hat, so wie bei Maps4BW ersichtlich.
Also könnte Maps4BW hier doch richtig sein.
Anhalten und in den Innenhof zwischen die Häuser gehen konnte ich leider nicht.
mappy123 (2019-09-07 12:27:17+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe mal einen Marker gesetzt. Das erhöht die Chance dass jemand vorbei kommt und es prüfen kann.
Hjart (2019-05-01 17:10:31+00:00): Jeg har rullet det meste af denne ændring tilbage. Se bl.a. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/r5zK5_LfYSbp2D_aPYAwvQ
PT-53 (2019-05-05 13:02:47+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,
Du hast an diesem Straßenabschnitt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315482844/history highway=secondary in highway=30 abgeändert.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Geofreund1 (2019-05-05 14:17:55+00:00): Eigentlich sollte maxspeed auf 30 gesetzt werden. Bin wohl von der Maus abgerutscht :(
viloan (2019-05-01 15:39:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
*abq* (2019-06-14 08:54:52+00:00): Hi Guillaume,
you created tourism attraction Gazon du Faing at the top of Ringbuhlkopf. But the peak Gazon du Faing is way further north. I separated tourism attraction and its name from the peak.
viloan (2019-05-01 15:45:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Allebazi (2019-05-01 15:56:56+00:00): Obrigada pelas dicas, viloan. As edições feitas por mim foram realmente para mapear onde faço minhas pesquisas.
4004 (2019-05-05 00:20:53+00:00): в киоске же вроде и кофе/выпечку продавали? можно оба тега
4004 (2019-05-05 00:22:10+00:00): том, что на вокзале
michaello (2019-05-06 06:22:57+00:00): поскольку кофе и выпечкой они не ограничиваются, подумал, что имеет смысл сменить все же на небольшой магазин
4004 (2019-05-06 17:38:19+00:00): логично. оставлю пока оба тега.
а пицца-кофе на остановке прям неожиданно
4004 (2019-05-05 00:25:22+00:00): ого, колледж переименовали? вещи вроде старых имен не пишем  в основное имя, лучше в олд_наме. и сайт нерабочий новый.
а общага выше по улице точно учебный корпус?
michaello (2019-05-06 06:28:06+00:00): колледжи объединили, теперь это всё один колледж. 
да, точно учебный корпус
4004 (2019-05-06 19:41:14+00:00): ок, спасибо, название поправлю и здание в отношение универа занесу
PT-53 (2019-05-05 11:38:48+00:00): Hallo OSMchecker,
Du hast diesen Straßenabschnitt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687170977/history mit access=no generell und unbefristet gesperrt.


Nach diesem SZ-Artikel https://www.schwaebische.de/landkreis/landkreis-ravensburg/wangen_artikel,-sperrung-der-lindauer-stra%C3%9Fe-in-wangen-steht-bevor-_arid,11038135.html
werden die Abrißarbeiten an der Brücke vom 15.04. bis 06.05.2019 durchgeführt. Dann müßte die Straßensperrung bereits am übermorgen wieder vorbei sein. Oder wie lange dauert die Sperrung?
Fragende Grüße
user_8613419 (2019-05-05 14:03:17+00:00): Nach dem SZ Artikel https://www.schwaebische.de/landkreis/landkreis-ravensburg/wangen_artikel,-lindauer-straße-in-wangen-bleibt-eine-weitere-woche-gesperrt-_arid,11047791.html wird die Straße noch bis 10. Mai gesperrt sein
PT-53 (2019-05-05 14:30:31+00:00): Hallo OSMchecker, 
im OSM-Forum wird überwiegend die Meinung vertreten, daß eine "Vollsperrung" erst aber einer Sperrung von mind. einem halben Jahr mit access=no eingetragen werden soll.
Für kürzere Sperrungen soll dagegen temporary:access=no @ (...) verwendet werden. Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/temporary_(conditional)
Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235156250#map=15/48.1613/9.6272
Bitte nimm die Sperre - nach Freigabe der Straße wieder heraus und verwende künftig - bei Sperrungen unter einem halben Jahr - temporary:access.
Grüße
user_8613419 (2019-05-05 17:07:21+00:00): OKay.
viloan (2019-05-01 16:27:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-05-01 16:28:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
JJ-gliding (2019-06-23 08:45:31+00:00): Evl, Je hebt de loop van de Woerdsestraat volgens mij onterecht gewijzigd
abakus_uploader (2019-05-01 22:30:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2019-05-01 16:38:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:19:20+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I started discussion about recommending to not use this tag. Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6440957315/history
user_3022894 (2019-08-14 20:23:04+00:00): Habe die Hausnummer später durch Survey noch überprüft.
JeroenHoek (2019-05-01 17:34:51+00:00): Ah, nee! Er ligt geen barrière tussen die stukjes rijbanen, maar wel een doorgetrokken streep. Als je ze weer samenvoegt moeten bij alle vier knooppunten keerverbodrelaties toegevoegd worden om routers niet het idee te geven dat je daar mag keren.

Ik zou ze loslaten, voor die paar meter biedt het samenvoegen geen voordelen.
JeroenHoek (2019-05-01 17:39:08+00:00): Het stukje brug is ook nog eenrichtingsverkeer. Vind je het erg als ik deze revert?
Jan Wilts (2019-05-01 18:02:02+00:00): Ah ok, nee dat is prima. Ik dacht dat het alleen de bedoeling was dat bij een fysieke scheiding rijbanen apart getekend worden. Dan mag je hem reverten. Moeten de rijbanen bij de stephensonviaduct dan ook niet apart?
Jan Wilts (2019-05-01 18:03:11+00:00): Dat bij die brug was een fout inderdaad.
Jan Wilts (2019-05-01 18:05:10+00:00): Ik had al mijn twijfels bij deze :)
JeroenHoek (2019-05-01 18:40:49+00:00): Soms is het inderdaad handiger om de rijrichtingen los te houden als er maar een kort stukje tussen fysiek gescheiden delen zit en er een doorgetrokken streep is waardoor een router sowieso geen keerinstructie kan geven daar. Het levert ook een beter begrijpbare kaart op in dit geval.

Bij langere stukken is het inderdaad conventie om de wegdelen als één way te tekenen. Het Stephensonviaduct is trouwens ook een geval waar ze losgemaakt kunnen worden, omdat de scheiding vanaf de Julianalaan een flink stuk is doorgetrokken (tot aan het viaduct), en er geen onderbrekingen in de streep zitten (keren mag daar gewoon niet).

Bij andere stukken, zoals de Tesselschadestraat, is het wel verstandig om de conventie van één lijn te volgen waar er geen oversteekeiland zit, omdat auto's daar wel mogen keren. Bij gescheiden banen kan een router immers niet besluiten dat je er wel kan keren als je de straat waar hij je heen stuurde voorbijrijdt.
hvalentim (2019-05-08 00:16:57+00:00): Um edifício não é um "isolated dwelling"!
czubi (2019-06-05 17:59:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6441008258#map=19/50.94513/10.73455

Warum ist das ein Fußgängerüberweg?
BCNorwich (2019-05-02 07:30:17+00:00): Hello MacLondon,

Sorry to say that Way: Wood Lane (687179793) has been made to double back on itself (from A to B and back to A).

There are a lot of routes involved so I'll leave it for you to repair.

Regards Bernard.
MacLondon (2019-05-02 15:11:09+00:00): Thanks Bernard. This is now corrected.
bobwz (2019-05-02 22:16:10+00:00): Greetings! I was looking for some clarification on why some of these building footprints were marked with a relation and landuse=retail. The majority of these buildings are actually "mixed-use" with shops on the ground floor and apartments above them. There are a couple buildings which are fully retail. Wouldn't it be more accurate to leave the mixed-use buildings without a landuse?
bobwz (2019-05-10 17:57:33+00:00): I haven't heard back on this. I'm going to tweak the landuse to match the layout of the area and remove the landuse from the mixed-use buildings.
Javierpf (2019-05-13 16:40:44+00:00): Hola Gaby, vi que creaste unos retaining_walls en la nueva circunvalacion.
Queria comentarte que te faltó considerar la dirección, para que la derecha de la way quede para el lado mas bajo. +info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=retaining_wall
viloan (2019-05-01 17:13:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
aquarix (2019-05-01 22:03:17+00:00): Hello, could you please divide your changesets in smaller pieces in the future to group it at maximum one country per changeset? This would be nice. This changeset here touches 6 out of 7 continents and notifies many people that are actually not affected.
Regards aquarix
ThePacki (2019-05-02 08:13:35+00:00): Second that, additionally, you just changed the waste tag's order in Switzerland, any reason for that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69774728
freebeer (2019-05-03 12:34:50+00:00): also, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245822364 the word `glas' is not part of the british englisch lingua franca of osm (and may not even be correct when spelt dif'rently)
nw520 (2019-05-03 13:11:35+00:00): Hello @freebeer, for this way I only replaced ", " by ";" and sorted the values alphabetically. If I recall correctly I didn't introduce the value `glas(s)` anywhere.

However, just to be safe I reverted this changeset with #69843212 .
nw520 (2019-05-03 13:13:04+00:00): Hi @aquarix, I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "notified". Are you using OSMCha and have been notified there?
SomeoneElse (2019-05-03 14:04:27+00:00): @nw520 Many people use OSM's history tab where they are to see local edits.  Worldwide edits such as this appear "everywhere" even if no local objects have been changed.
aquarix (2019-05-03 16:05:03+00:00): Thanks SomeoneElse, that's exactly what I wanted to say with my initial comment.
Cyclono (2019-05-02 09:37:19+00:00): Zoveel bos is weg O.o..
eggie (2019-05-01 18:53:48+00:00): Dag Pieter P..  tertiary_link is hier niet goed gebruikt. Ik heb het veranderd in highway=unclassified. 
De tag embankment=yes zou eigenlijk op alle dijken horen. 
Het is er nog niet van gekomen om dat overal toe te passen. Op de afritten naar beneden zou ik het niet doen.
De Korteweg-Oost heb ik op motor_vehicle=destination gezet. 
Die "fout" van highway=pedestrian kom ik heel veel tegen hier en zal nog een erfenis zijn van een import van kaartenmaker And uit 2007. 
MVG,
Eggie
Dakon (2020-02-12 17:25:30+00:00): Zunächst mal: so wie aktuell ist das Tagging definitiv falsch, entweder service oder usage, aber nicht beides.

Und dann stellt sich mir die Frage, wo ersichtlich ist, dass dies keine eigene Strecke mehr ist. Ist das zu einem Bahnhofsgleis heruntergestuft? Wer ist der Eigentümer der Strecke? Das ist meist alles nicht so einfach zu sehen, schon gar nicht vor Ort…
ofc (2019-05-01 18:52:32+00:00): De nieuwe route loopt via het grasbetonpad op de kruin van de dijk. Ik heb foto's en GPX tracks gemaakt, maar heb het nog niet ingetekend (weet ook nog niet hoe dat moet).
Een nieuwe alternatieve route is ook aangegeven. Die loopt via Noordwendige dijk en Nieuwendijk.
De oude route bestaat ook nog en loopt via de Kolk en Naaldeweg.
Het pad vanaf de nieuwendijk naar de Slaper wijkt ook iets af van de werkelijkheid. Dat drufde ik niet aan te passen omdat ik route relaties stuk zou kunnen maken.
Peter Elderson (2019-05-02 05:05:06+00:00): Wil je hulp bij het aanpassen, of zal ik het doen? In beide gevallen is het handig als je mij track en foto's toestuurt via wandelingen.digitaal@gmail.com.
Ik was zelf alleen op de beschrijving afgegaan, en die zegt niet precies waar het pad ligt.
Dimacn (2019-05-02 08:11:52+00:00): В name пишем только официальное название, подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Пожалуйста исправьте.
literan (2019-05-02 11:26:04+00:00): я исправлю. Нет смысла им писать, у них инструкция по покемонам
literan (2019-05-02 11:26:38+00:00): он еще и лес с подписью нарисовал там, где на снимке большая автостоянка
SomeoneElse (2019-05-01 20:46:02+00:00): Er no, I don't think that anyone would class High Holborn as a peak in OSM terms.  What makes you think that it is?
PeaksearchWG (2019-05-01 22:06:10+00:00): Hi there, I was survey in the area awhile back and catalogued a number of listed hills and summits. Oddly enough, this is actually listed as an actual summit, being a county top. I appreciate however that in OSM terms there may be more appropriate tags, depending on particular location etc. Its all a learning curve, so any advise is always good :)
SomeoneElse (2019-05-03 10:55:55+00:00): If there's something in the area that has a confirmed elevation (that you can measure or that is available to OSM from a suitable source) then just add an ele tag for that value to the object.
eggie (2019-05-01 21:09:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-05-01 21:13:27+00:00): JDag nonnahs  Je hebt nu van een heel grasveld een speeltuin gemaakt. Dat had ook gewoon met een node gekund. De speeltuin zal vast niet heten De Speeltuin van Montfoort..
Ik pas wat aan.
Waarom op een doorlopende weg noexit=yes? 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-01 21:22:41+00:00): Door schuiven met de kaart heb je een node van een doodlopende weg verplaatst per abuis naar de Joop Westerweelstraat. Ik heb die verwijderd.
De naam heb ik van de speeltuin gehaald. 
MVG,
Eggie
Bonix-Mapper (2019-09-04 20:05:44+00:00): Datinho,

Segue outro caso onde foi necessário recuperar os dados originais após a sua edição.

Em caso de dúvidas você pode utilizar um dos dois grupos da comunidade de mapeadores brasileiros:

1- https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade

2 - https://t.me/osmsp

Até mais.
Leo Slager (2019-05-01 22:41:20+00:00): Are you sure you put this on the right spot ?
There are no traffic-signs on the foto's.
Leo Slager (2019-05-02 09:37:23+00:00): You made a mistake.
This way is not oneway.
The way in NW direction is not either.
That is a private road and that is already on the map.
I reverted your change.
Please do not interfere with local mappers if you do not know the rules how to map !
Leo Slager (2019-05-02 09:39:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
[hidden] (2019-05-02 16:27:35+00:00): First, please keep in mind I am not mapping since yesterday. And this is something you can check on my profile. I am not very active, but I know my ropes.
Second, I was at that place yesterday and I have seen the sign. You can check the track I have just uploaded: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Czesiu/traces/2975908 
The navigation directed us through Loosterweg Noord all the way, however we needed to turn right to Zwartelaan, because of the one way in opposite direction.
Third, I do not know what are those "recent fotomateriaal" mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1763381 as there was no reference being given.
Fourth, I have just checked the mapillary. There is a picture from Apr 22, 2019 showing the sign: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.27786833333333&lng=4.550034999999999&z=17&pKey=-XkzWQBta8kNC1RIOUitjA&focus=photo
Fifth, I am officially pissed off.

Have a good day.