piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tonyf1 (2017-11-30 23:01:05+00:00): Hi, 2 months ago you placed a castle named home here, I am assuming that the apartment named Home is similarly personal information and not suitable for OSM. I have deleted it.
tonyf1 (2017-11-30 23:14:54+00:00): Hi. Thanks  for your contributions, Its important though to use more descriptive changeset descriptions than 'change'. You should aim to say what you changed, why you changed it and how you knew it was right. Another user has identified issues with your changes, changeset descriptions help us differentiate your more valuable contributions from the problematic ones.
Alexander-II (2017-12-01 11:38:22+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в ОСМ. Спасибо, что вносите правки.  
Касательно этой точки. Раз такого объекта больше не существует в реальности, и не предполагается, что это временно (например, что терминал для оплаты отключили из розетки, или магазин закрылся на месяц на ремонт), то такую точку можно смело удалять. Сейчас получилось, что точка осталась, а тегов на ней нету никаких. Такой объект считается некорректным в ОСМ. Я исправлю (удалю).
sommerluk (2017-12-01 10:05:54+00:00): Merci pour la correction !
👍
mueschel (2017-12-03 13:48:32+00:00): Please fix your workflow to include spell checking of tags. I'm fixing wrong spellings of 'implicit' almost every day.
saikabhi (2017-12-05 04:47:34+00:00): Hello Mueschel,

Thank you for solving this error. I will be informing my team of this error and we will also be running a linter to detect these issues.

Thanks
Abhishek
althio (2018-01-04 11:30:40+00:00): Bonjour eidolies,

Pour ce genre de modifications (et autres changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54211585 et quelques autres), j'aurai apprécié une discussion préalable.
Par exemple : la discussion après mes modifications https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47952755
ou le sujet sur le forum
http://forum.openstreetmap.fr/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=5614

On peut discuter de footway|ou|pedestrian et linéaire|ou|surfacique mais les modifications et suppressions un peu brutales sont à éviter. 

En l'état actuel la représentation est peut-être bonne sur un rendu de carte, mais la représentation schématique est très dégradée pour le routage en mode piéton. Un exemple : https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=48.848761%2C2.394746&point=48.848769%2C2.395803&locale=fr&vehicle=foot&weighting=fastest&elevation=true&use_miles=false&layer=Omniscale

Toujours disponible pour en discuter ici ou sur le forum.
user_4412096 (2018-01-04 12:48:38+00:00): Bonjour althio,

Merci pour ton message, j'ai découvert le forum après quelques edits et en effet avec le recul je remarque qu'ils auraient dû nécessiter un avis de la communauté au préalable, non seulement dû à leur importance - et, je viens de le remarquer, qu'un autre contributeur (ou plusieurs), en l'occurence toi, était en train de travailler également dessus.

Merci pour ton message très pertinent (je note aussi l'outil graphhopper pour "debugger" la carte/des edits).

Que puis-je faire en l'état actuel, pour réparer mes gaffes? :)

Merci
althio (2018-01-05 10:03:51+00:00): Salut,

On peut commencer par la discussion sur le forum. Cela t'intéresse d'ouvrir un sujet, du côté de http://forum.openstreetmap.fr/viewforum.php?f=2

Quand on aura décidé :
- si on duplique surfaces+lignes
- dans quel cas on choisit pedestrian|footway|sidewalk|...

On pourrait ensuite modifier la carte et mettre à jour les versions françaises du wiki, qui méritent une révision ou une nouvelle traduction à mon avis.
GerdP (2018-10-31 14:39:26+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed that you changed a lot of ways here so that they are all named Constitution Trail. My understanding is that the ways should be combined in one or more route relations with this name.
Did you consider this?
maraf24 (2017-12-02 20:01:30+00:00): Budynek znowu zniknął.
Proszę nie ustawiać Edytorze obiektu "Obszaru".
To jest "Budynek", nie "Obszar".
Uterouter (2017-12-01 08:40:57+00:00): Маршруты все-таки поломались...
literan (2017-12-01 11:28:31+00:00): Добрый день! Маршруты поправил. Но остался еще косячок - посмотрите, теперь все дворовые проезды как будто пересекают трамвайные пути. Наверняка ведь при выезде из дворов можно только направо поворачивать? Навигатор будет предлагать развернуться на этих пересечениях (пример - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5256741700/history#map=19/55.82534/37.45172&layers=N )
Uterouter (2017-12-01 11:41:12+00:00): Вроде везде где нашел знаки "только направо" со двора, выставил ограничения. Это в основном рядом со светофорами. В остальных знаков не нашел. Пройдусь позже, проверю.
literan (2017-12-01 11:59:32+00:00): так а разве там сплошную не нарисовали вдоль всех путей?? ее пересекать нельзя
Uterouter (2017-12-01 12:09:26+00:00): Про сплошную не припомню. Надо посмотреть будет. Она обычно за год стирается. На всех последних панорамах её нет...
literan (2017-12-01 12:15:12+00:00): Ее в октябре или ноябре нанесли, на дорожных форумах стон был. Типа выделенку для трамваев сделали. Раньше по трамвайке все ездили - а теперь Свободы стоит по вечерам, аж хвост на Волоколамское шоссе торчит
Uterouter (2017-12-01 12:20:31+00:00): Тогда надо глянуть в каких местах ее нанесли. Неужто по всей длине до канала?
literan (2017-12-01 12:24:56+00:00): Вроде как да, с разрывами на перекрестках. Я сначала подумал, что это и стало причиной вашего желания разделить улицу (и оно было бы логично) :-)
Uterouter (2017-12-01 12:30:59+00:00): Раз так то выезды поправлю. Причина была в маршрутизации. В таком виде вариантов больше. По подобию аналогичних дорог в Сокольниках и где-то еще видел.
jonorossi (2018-06-13 12:22:28+00:00): Hi, I'm trying to understand (your changeset message is empty) why you've changed the access on this track I mapped to no access by foot. When I mapped it there were no signs indicating no access and it is a public road reserve, council even have a fancy timber gate to walk through on the SE end. Thanks
b-jazz (2018-07-26 04:21:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543626436 seems to be a very odd shape that doesn't correlate to any ground features. It is listed as Forest, but includes several residences, and excludes nearby forest area that is likely part of the same forest system. Is this way added in error?
chillly (2017-12-02 16:02:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM

Buildings are very welcome detail, but I think these are semi-detached, ie they are each two houses. This becomes important when addresses are added, which is the best case. 

If you need help or hints, feel free to ask.

Chris
Constable (2017-12-01 08:45:51+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la modifica, se questo edificio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482906166 è un condominio sarebbe meglio etichettarlo come building=apartments, perché building=house è adatto a case monofamiliari (villette o simili) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:building?uselang=it#Valori
Inoltre, se conosci la posizione dei civici, aggiungili pure, in questo modo http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4273651921, creando un punto singolo in corrispondenza della reale posizione della targhetta con scritto il numero civico.
Questo altro inoltre https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543794266 andrebbe squadrato, selezionandolo, poi tasto dx del mouse, ortogonalizza, perché nel 90% dei casi gli edifici hanno una pianta ad angoli retti e questo non sembra fare eccezione :D
Se hai dubbi chiedi pure, grazie ancora
ciao
Tomio (2017-12-06 10:58:16+00:00): kitcarson, 
No Openstreetmap devemos mapear apenas objetos existentes.
Esse "Futuro" Parque Publico não deve ser mapeado. Atualmente a área é apenas um estacionamento.
Vc também alterou uma área de vegetação (natural=wood) para parque (leisure=park), mas a área realmente não é um parque, sendo apenas vegetação.
Verifique na wikipedia o significado das tags qdo houver dúvida. Temos um Grupo de Suporte no Telegram para ajudá-lo com as dúvidas. Vou refazer as tags editadas.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-12-01 15:14:50+00:00): You asked for a review, so here it is.

Firstly you changed the lane to `building=residental`, which is wrong. All the buildings are mapped, so it would be better to delete the way itself.
andrefantin (2017-12-02 09:30:56+00:00): Thank you! Didn't know I could remove it. Done now.
naoliv (2017-12-01 00:31:06+00:00): José, bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
O que seria essa parte com aǵua que você adicionou ao mapa?
José Pachón (2017-12-01 00:56:33+00:00): Little pond
naoliv (2017-12-01 01:25:25+00:00): Aparenta não existir uma lagoa aí...
O que você quis representar?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-18 08:46:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71357138 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fake parks in Spain.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2875
CkEsc (2018-06-29 19:23:37+00:00): Не согласен про переход https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530705746
Он вполне рабочий. Почему вы его так пометили?
tonyf1 (2017-12-01 00:51:06+00:00): Hi. You can square up buildings with the ID right button menu. Can you please pause your edits while you read and reply to your changeset comments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-18 08:46:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71357138 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fake parks in Spain.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2875
naoliv (2017-12-01 00:52:19+00:00): Daniel, não parece que existe um lago nesse local.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-18 08:46:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71357138 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fake parks in Spain.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2875
cadsauxk (2018-01-29 21:27:30+00:00): Dear @berns017, 

you defined the Centro de Tecnologia Nuclear as a military area. 

This is not true. It is a civil research institute, it has nothing to do with the military. 

How did you arrive at this?
cadsauxk (2018-01-29 21:31:39+00:00): You defined a meadow with the name "Grama do DCC". https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543799049
There are no meadows in UFMG (except perhaps at the Veterinary faculty). 

And "Grama do DCC" is not a name but a  redundant description. I would suggest you change this to natural=grass and remove this name or move it to the description tag. 

thank you
berns017 (2018-01-29 21:50:42+00:00): Hey, Gerald. For a while, I was a Physics researcher and the "Centro de Tecnologia Nuclear", even being located inside a university campus, it is actually "controled" by military force. That's the discussion within the university community, because some people do not feel good about it. You have also to remember that there is a Military School and training area right next to the campus.
Now about "Grama do DCC", I heard this name among the students, but I'm not sure about the classification, though. Moreover, it is indeed an area of relaxation after school hours. So it's not just a "grass", but a meeting area among students.
cadsauxk (2018-01-29 23:51:04+00:00): Olá berns017, tomo pela sua resposta que compreende português?

Sou professor departamento de física da UFMG, nas horas vagas contribuo com o OSM do qual participo há 6 anos.

Conheço bem o CDTN e sua origem, mas  não é uma área militar ou sob controle militar. É uma área de segurança, isto sim, feito por empresa terceirizada. Não muito diferente da segurança de uma agência bancária. O CDTN como você deve saber está ligado ao Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia etc. Não se encontra portanto sob controle militar.

Então penso que esta classificação deve voltar ao que era antes. Vou puxar o histórico de edições e posso fazer as alterações, se você concordar.

Sobre a área em frente ao DCC, neste caso a classificação melhor seria leisure=park e loc_name="Gramado do DCC". loc_name significa nome local, um nome informal ou não-oficial. 

landuse=meadow significa "usado como pasto", não sei o que os estudantes fazem lá mas creio que não estejam comendo a grama, haha.

um grande abraço
cadsauxk (2018-01-30 00:22:48+00:00): Fiz a substituição por amenity=research_institute e usei os elementos existentes para criar um multipológono
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7950238

Também aproveitei para acrescentar o "Desenvolvimento" no nome.

obrigado por sua contribuição, eu mesmo não havia me tocado que o CDTN estava representado na área mas não devidamente descrito.

abraço
eggie (2017-12-01 07:17:15+00:00): review_requested:
Het is bijna goed. Je nieuwe wandelpad zit vast aan de landuse en dat is ongewenst. Bij verschuiven  gaat het dan mis, want dan komt alles mee. 
Dit was je edit.. Je kunt het daar goed zien. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54220748
eggie (2017-12-01 07:27:16+00:00): landuse= grass losgemaakt van meer paden.
Goed inzoomen voorkomt plakken. Editor iD plakt helaas snel.
Den Haag is helemaal het verkeerde voorbeeld, want daar zit overal de landuse aan de wegen en is bijna niet meer te mappen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-18 08:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71357138 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fake parks in Spain.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2875
tonyf1 (2017-12-01 01:50:19+00:00): Thanks for your edit. I did some tweaks in Changeset #54221236
nevw (2017-12-01 06:50:39+00:00): Hi
I added the tag highway=footway to the footway at the end of Chartley Street. 
While you are in the area can you check the footway from Eaton Close as it goes through a house and seems out of place.
tonyf1 (2017-12-01 02:01:10+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your contributions. I suggest railway=rail be replaced with railway=proposed
tonyf1 (2017-12-02 01:47:51+00:00): The proposed railway was deleted by user MapAnalyser465
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-18 08:46:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71357138 where the changeset comment is: Reverting fake parks in Spain.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2875
ralley (2017-12-05 10:03:54+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  As previously discussed there are some issues with your changesets in this area.  Will yoube able to fix up the issues?  (Nodes shared between unrelated ways; overlapped buildings with strange shapes; dubious council reserve; Cambrai park has a building in ESRI imagery; swimming pools not in imagery; park that just appears to be a front yard etc.)
santamariense (2017-12-01 03:04:42+00:00): Não existe mais o ponto de taxi que você apagou?
liefdedel (2017-12-01 10:49:27+00:00): Sim, não existe mais
santamariense (2017-12-01 02:53:29+00:00): Olá Jeverson e bem vindo ao OSM, 

Aqui você marcou toda uma área residencial como sendo uma igreja. O que você quis representar aqui?
santamariense (2017-12-05 14:31:45+00:00): Eu reverti esta sua edição. Sugiro tentar adicionar a igreja novamente porque é uma coisa muito importante. Dúvidas? Contate a comunidade https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact (principalmente pelo Telegram)
Supaplex (2017-12-02 05:57:22+00:00): 整個學校是建築?
BCNorwich (2017-12-01 08:05:36+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The recreation ground can be a park as well, I've amended the tags to better show this.
I also added the Memorial Gates and tweaked the area separating it from highways.
Regards Bernard
Dinamik (2017-12-01 03:49:07+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=423768#p423768
Sergey Astakhov (2017-12-01 13:28:39+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=675221#p675221
santamariense (2017-12-01 02:58:05+00:00): Olá liefdedel e bem vindo ao OSM,

Muito legal o mapeamento que está fazendo.
OBS: Mapeie apenas o que realmente existe em solo. E dê uma descrição correta do que você está fazendo. Como aqui neste conjunto de edições que você disse estar "Adicionado mais alguns edificios", quando na verdade está adicionando uma piscina.
liefdedel (2017-12-01 10:51:44+00:00): Oi, obrigado!
Terei mais cuidado ao adicionar a descrição das mudanças que fiz.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-12-06 14:22:52+00:00): Não cole vias com áreas como fez aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494570485
mueschel (2017-12-04 11:49:00+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I found some nodes like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5256902958
There is only one tag describing the object, but no known tag as they are documented in the Wiki. In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.

Please have a look and refine the tagging.
Cheers, Jan
Supaplex (2018-01-21 07:58:10+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
bhav_ana (2018-12-15 03:04:24+00:00): Hi Tembikai,

While working on one of the Indonesian City (IPOH), Came across scenario where there is the classification gap between tertiary and unclassified.
Is there any specific reason for marking Highway Road to unclassified, If not can we go and make edits to avoid classification gap.
way 316076014
way 543531146
orthocircular (2021-06-21 20:15:19+00:00): heya according to the wiki, collecting related-category but physically-separate objects in a relation isn't very kosher on OSM: apparently if people want to know about historic districts in salem they should just do a query for historic=district. what do you think about possibly removing this relation, does it have a use?
user_1213011 (2021-06-21 22:29:25+00:00): I'm fine with removing the relation. I honestly don't remember why I would have created it in the first place.
user_1213011 (2021-06-21 22:32:49+00:00): I went ahead and deleted it.
Unhallowed (2017-12-05 23:20:59+00:00): Hello bobbydigital,

I appreciate your effort and joining the mapping community, however, adding fake parks, rivers, and lakes to your house damages the time and effort that others have put in to create an accurate map for all to use.

I encourage you to only map existing features as you see them in the world going forward.

Thank you,
Unhallowed
wille (2017-12-02 18:33:25+00:00): Excelente edição, Felipe! Muito obrigado!
Aleks-Berlin (2017-12-01 11:24:35+00:00): Hi Loinguyen, please write tourism=hotel, not amenity=Hotel,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
Thanks, Alex
user_5359 (2017-12-01 04:43:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The most value of your name values are more descriptions(this key also exists).
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-12-31 03:42:01+00:00): Você apagou o nome da cidade aqui.
jgon6 (2017-12-06 04:34:48+00:00): I noticed all of these new houses suddenly showed up on the map, which is cool because the map needs a lot added around town. I'm just wondering is there a reason you didn't any footpath-road crossings in your changeset?
kartonage (2017-12-01 05:04:59+00:00): Should be "Brandenburg:" of course.
pitscheplatsch (2017-12-01 15:54:43+00:00): Hi omgnowai. May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped footways? I guess they are just wrongly tagged, should be sidewalks? See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
omgnowai (2017-12-01 17:03:39+00:00): Yeah, some of them should be sidewalks and some just shouldn't be there at all as there are no paths or sidewalks.
user_5359 (2017-12-04 20:01:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
user_5359 (2017-12-03 19:46:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a park don't use area=yes, use instead leisure=park.
RicoElectrico (2017-12-06 19:19:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543826357/

Nie ignoruj ostrzeżeń walidatora (tak, JOSM to raportuje) gdy wysyłasz dane. Zrobiłeś budynek z geometrią od czapy. Proszę o poprawę i stosowanie się do wskazówek walidatora.
Constable (2017-12-01 12:58:48+00:00): this park looks fictional and this note confirms that feeling http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1222827
I'm going to revert this changeset
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 14:19:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5257150178/history has 植物 = 扶桑花 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
user_5359 (2018-01-16 21:16:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Can you please us english keys and values. For more information please read wiki.osm.org
Glassman (2017-12-01 22:01:50+00:00): the name tag shouldn't be used to describe a feature. You could tag the area as leisure=nature_reserve and leave the pond as it was originally tagged.
andi9876 (2017-12-10 08:38:38+00:00): Dear, no attraction there! Please stop add!
eggie (2017-12-01 08:18:09+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-12-01 08:22:26+00:00): Ik zie wat wonderlijke tags. Niet alle stukjes groen krijgen de tag Leisure=park. Ook ontstaat in het voetgangersgebied opeens een meer?
eggie (2017-12-01 08:23:23+00:00): Leisure park is een functie van een bepaald gebied met een naam. Ik over weeg de changeset terug  te draaien. Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-12-01 08:35:06+00:00): reverted wegens niet bestaande  vijver en parkedits
eggie (2017-12-01 08:39:30+00:00): Dit waren je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54225744
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust. Ik pas als voorbeeld even wat aan.
eggie (2017-12-01 08:48:03+00:00): Als voorbeeld heb ik landuse=grass toegevoegd en losse bomen. Het gaat om wat je ziet. Het zijn geen parken. Onbestemd stukjes groen kun je ook taggen als landuse=village_green
eggie (2017-12-01 08:26:32+00:00): natural=wood is een niet meer gebruikte tag. landuse=forest kan wel mits er echt een stukje bos staat. Ook niet te snel tags van andere mappers veranderen svp.
Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-12-01 08:30:12+00:00): Probeer te voorkomen dat paden aan de landuse gaan plakken. Dit geeft problemen bij verschuivingen. Ik pas wat aan.
eggie (2017-12-01 08:34:18+00:00): reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54225880
eggie (2017-12-01 08:51:46+00:00): Ik heb als voorbeeld wat landuse toegevoegd en ook losgekoppeld van de paden. Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust. natural=grassland is hier niet van toepassing.. Dat is meer voor natuurgebieden.
Nakaner-repair (2018-02-11 09:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56258490 where the changeset comment is: Revert Pokémon Go edits by JulKoes and an incomplete revert of these edits by calfarome in order to revert it properly. See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tipps-fuer-neue-pokemon-go-mapper/?lang=de for further information.
andi9876 (2017-12-10 08:38:22+00:00): Dear, no attraction there! Please stop add!
RoterEmil (2018-01-01 12:52:43+00:00): Hallo geozeisig, warum hast Du hier das tourism=viewpoint entfernt?
PT-53 (2018-01-01 13:23:06+00:00): @ RoterEmil
Auszug aus Wiki zu tourism=viewpoint:
Aufgrund der Regel One feature, one OSM element sollte der Punkt nicht gleichzeitig ein anderes Objekt sein wie zB natural=peak oder man_made=tower beinhalten. In diesen Fällen kann viewpoint=yes hinzugefügt werden. 
.
Grüße
RoterEmil (2018-01-01 13:29:53+00:00): danke, PT-53, für den mutmaßlichen Grund der Änderungen. Wie ist das allerdings logisch mit einer direction-Angabe zu vereinbaren? natural=peak hat ja keine direction(s), sondern nur der Aussichtspunkt oder denke ich schief?
PT-53 (2018-01-01 16:15:29+00:00): @RoterEmil,
Da habe ich keine Ahnung. Frage doch mal die OTM-Macher.
Grüße
Tiamate (2018-01-02 10:44:56+00:00): Laut stefan wird in OTM viewpoint=yes nicht berücksichtigt.
Nur tourism=viewpoint
RoterEmil (2018-01-15 15:37:44+00:00): hab es mal ins dt. Forum eingebracht, da ich hier grundsätzlichen Diskussionsbedarf sehe. Wenn ihr mögt, bringt euch dort gern ein: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=680922#p680922