piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OpenMapMax (2015-02-25 14:41:31+00:00): Da gabs einen Konflikt mit einem deiner Änderungssätze. Ich hatte mich leider nur bei fast allem entschieden deine Änderung zu bevorzugen. Hab mich da bei der Konfliktlösung also vertan.  Ich schau mal wie ichs am besten Hinkriege. Oder alles rückgängig.
Hatte schon lange keine Konflikte mehr zum lösen.
Danke für den Hinweis
OpenMapMax (2015-02-25 15:06:04+00:00): Es ist ein kurzes Stück von diesem Weg und der Ortsstraße.
Es sieht so aus als ob es einen Konflikt mit Landuse=Residental gab. Dort wo die Straßen an gleicher Stelle mit der Orts-Fläche verliefen.
Ist nur ein kurzes Teilstück im Ort.
zimba (2015-02-25 17:15:16+00:00): Ah okay, dann waren wir dort fast zur gleichen zeit unterwegs. danke fuers richten, schaut wieder gut aus!
OpenMapMax (2015-02-25 17:25:45+00:00): Hab mich fürs Nachzeichnen entschieden, da ich eh die Punkte von "Landuse" bzw. vom Ortsbereich verwenden konnte. Und von Dort hab ich Lokales Wissen, wohne ja auch in dem Gebiet.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-24 17:20:51+00:00): Ronda wymagają dodania tagu junction=roundabout.

Zjazdów nie powinno się łączyć z wjazdami, bo potem nawigacje głupieją.
mueschel (2019-12-21 19:05:27+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du mal nach diesem Knoten schauen? Welche der beiden Möglichkeiten ist denn der richtige Name?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3370285817
StephaneP (2015-02-25 09:11:29+00:00): Salut !
Attention, il ne faut pas ajouter des noms à l'aveugle. Par exemple, tu as ajouté à Vieillevigne le hamlet "La Gagnerie". Sur place, ce hameau n'existe pas.
MKnight (2015-06-26 13:54:39+00:00): Du hast in diesem Changeset diverse "building:level" gesetzt. 

Diesen Key gibt es nicht. Meintest Du "building:levels" oder "level"?
Eebie (2017-05-29 16:19:24+00:00): Hello,
I was interested in EuroVelo 16, the bike route that is visible on Waymarked trails for bikes. I can't find anything about this route on the official EuroVelo website http://www.eurovelo.com . I can only conclude that this route doesn't exist and that it should be deleted from OpenStreetMap. It is confusing to find routes on the map but not in reality on the ground.

Regards,

Eebie
Владимир К (2015-12-02 11:02:24+00:00): Линия без тэгов - не хорошо.
ToeBee (2015-02-25 21:25:09+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for your edits!

Question: You upgraded some roads to "tertiary." Is this appropriate? Tertiary roads are intended to be used on collectors or county highway type roads. These appear to be fairly minor roads that should probably be "unclassified." That one at the top, leading to the docks might even be a service road, in my opinion.
nsa_sailor (2015-02-25 23:25:25+00:00): Well, the widths of the roads shown on the map vary throughout the park. It would be nice if they were all shown equal widths. In fact the skinniest roads shown on the map are the most travelled.
I was also trying to delete the road on the NW side of the triangular section as that road was removed in 1998 when the building in the triangular space was built.
ToeBee (2015-02-26 16:37:19+00:00): The width of a given road on the map is a rendering issue. You are changing the map data in order to affect the rendering. We call this "tagging for the renderer" and there is a wiki page about it :)  http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

OSM should reflect "ground truth." The rendering on osm.org is unimportant at the end of the day. If you go to open.mapquest.com or a Mapbox map or whatever, they may render different roads at different widths than osm.org anyway.

All that being said, it looks like the main road in the park WAS tagged as a service road which was indeed incorrect. I have retagged it as an "unclassified" road. I also added some other details that I saw in Bing aerial imagery. Please feel free to review this if you have first hand knowledge of the area. You might have to do a force-reload in your browser to get the latest map with my changes.

Did you get the road that you wanted deleted? I'm not quite sure which one you are talking about. If you can't figure it out, please use the speech bubble button over on the right to create a note exactly where the change needs to happen and I'll see what I can do. 

By the way, the reason I noticed your edit is that I am in Manhattan, KS and generally try to keep en eye on things in Kansas. So again, welcome to the OSM project :)
gormur (2015-03-06 11:44:17+00:00): Be aware that your changeset replaced a few "name" tags with "oneway".
Luis36995 (2015-09-24 22:47:36+00:00): Hello gormur:
It was my mistake to add oneway instead of name. However I saw you fixed them. 
Thank you,
Luis,
axelr (2015-03-21 02:54:10+00:00): Nach deiner Änderung kommt kein Auto mehr auf den Parkplatz.
axelr (2015-03-21 02:56:57+00:00): Die Route 682 gehört nicht in die Master-Relation der 688 !
axelr (2015-03-21 02:58:52+00:00): Letzte Woche war da noch ne Oberleitung.
GerdP (2015-10-15 13:05:28+00:00): please review:
is it intended that the trunk 4 is
overlapping a highway=residential?
See e.g. way 327821192,way 324503577
Andrea Musuruane (2017-08-23 15:10:57+00:00): Ciao, come fa una fontanella ad aver associato un numero civico? Ciao, Andrea
lubosb (2015-02-26 16:25:50+00:00): Hi, this road looks like a mistake to me. Can you please delete it?
flaimo (2015-02-25 20:01:29+00:00): Ist das dann überhaupt noch offizieller Teil der Brunnenfeldstraße, oder gehört der name-Tag weg, weil es nur mehr ein einfacher Gehweg ist?

Oder ist der Weg breit genug für Einsatzfahrzeuge oder Servicefahrzeuge? Dann sollte es besser ein Service-Tag sein mit entsprechenden access Rechten.
pablopareja (2015-02-24 22:11:06+00:00): Hola! Gracias por los aportes. Sin embargo estás agregando nodos vacíos sin ningún tipo de información. Por favor, agregarle algún tag para que aparezca en el mapa, por ej. building, office o lo que sea. Las opciones aparecen en el propio editor.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-24 21:09:51+00:00): Dlaczego access=private na Poziomkowej?
tkedt (2015-02-25 06:40:18+00:00): Jak widać na orto, to jest zamknięte osiedle z bramą wjazdową (dodałem teraz bramę).
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-25 07:31:42+00:00): Ok, ale czy nie przydałoby się doprecyzować kto może tam wjechać? :-)
tkedt (2015-03-01 11:32:07+00:00): Nie wiem jak to ocenić bez wiedzy lokalnej. Czy (nawet po obejrzeniu zdjęcia na StreetView http://goo.gl/maps/uR8oB ) można to jakoś dokładniej określić?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-01 16:13:06+00:00): Patrzyłem na GSV i chyba jest ok.
BushmanK (2015-09-05 02:54:42+00:00): А как получилось, что весь контур одного из резервуаров Загорской ГАЭС обозначен как дамба? Там даже просто укрепленный берег не везде. Ну и рендерится неправильно из-за этого.
BushmanK (2015-09-05 02:55:15+00:00): Я имею в виду вот это http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2027203
ad47 (2015-09-05 14:57:04+00:00): Не одного, а обеих, тут, скорее всего, он был унаследован при создании мультиполигона. Ставил их, похоже, не я http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150435623/history Надо будет убрать, т.к. водоём вполне обычный.
robert (2015-02-24 23:37:34+00:00): Very good :).

(Caught us out there...)
dieterdreist (2015-02-25 09:41:31+00:00): non è un ospedale, chiedo di modificare il tagging. Suggerisco di guardarsi il healthcare 2.0 proposal nella wiki
MariaU (2015-02-24 21:51:13+00:00): Updated several buildings in my neighborhood
715371 (2015-02-25 00:09:16+00:00): Vertritt außer dir noch jemand die Meinung, dass oneway:bicycle sich nur auf die Fahrbahn bezieht? Steht so etwas im Wiki? Bevor du änderst, möchte ich das klären, sonst geht es so weiter wie es im letzten Jahr aufgehört hat.
ulamm (2015-02-25 07:13:20+00:00): Lies dir bitte endlich die englische Amleitung genau durch!
715371 (2015-02-25 12:36:39+00:00): Zitier es bitte.
ulamm (2015-02-25 13:33:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#cycleway_roadway

In der 2. (Fahrbahn) und 3. (opposite lane) Zeile steht "oneway:bicycle=no". In der 5. (opposite track) steht es nicht und stand es nie.
715371 (2015-02-25 19:26:48+00:00): Gut. Dann kannst du es trotzdem wieder da dran taggen, weil zZ niemand cycleway:oneway interpretiert und die oneway:bicycle=no an den Stellen relativ leicht wieder zu entfernen sind. Da das ohnehin von Anfang an nur temporär gedacht war, ändert sich also nichts. Das gleiche Problem haben wir bei cycleway=opposite_track. Ich werde das mal auf der Wiki Seite Kommentieren.
715371 (2015-02-25 00:18:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208496485

Ich sehe keine Notwendigkeit cycleway:obligatory=no oder cycleway:oneway=yes zu taggen. 

Hier das gleiche:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103545448

Willst du wegen so etwas wieder neuen Streit Anfangen?
ulamm (2015-02-25 07:20:44+00:00): An einer Tempo-50-Straße ist es alles andere als selbstverständlich, dass keine Benutzungspflicht besteht.
Und an Radwege an Einbahnstraßen sind oft für die Gegenrichtung zugelassen.
Daher sind beides relevante Informationen.
deleted_account (2015-02-25 10:14:24+00:00): addr:place a nie hamlet
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-01 03:52:11+00:00): I noticed you merged several of the I-476 offramps in this changeset together, which damaged the 'lanes' tags.  The person before you happened to split the ramps where the # of lanes changed and added where each lane went.  When you merged them together, it damaged this work.  Thus, I've partially reverted this changeset in Changeset 31624102 (I left the houses you added in tact).
foxox (2015-06-01 04:18:13+00:00): Thank you for the feedback here. It looked like something was wrong because of all of the different segments, but that explains it! I will be more careful in the future and look out for the lane tags
Mirecnet (2017-09-25 08:12:58+00:00): Preco je garaz uprostred Belianskych Tatier - daka chyba ?
aceman444 (2017-09-25 15:06:34+00:00): Ktoru presne budovu myslite?
Mirecnet (2017-09-25 18:32:58+00:00): Nazdar,
myslim, tuto garaz uprostred lesa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371042249#map=19/49.23470/20.29491
aceman444 (2017-09-25 19:59:47+00:00): Tajny sklad harvestorov asi :) Takto to v tej dobe prislo z katastra. Ale mate pravdu, dnes su budovy s tymito cislami inde. Takze som cisla pridelil na dnesne budovy a tieto 3 stavby v lese zrusil. Dakujem.
robert (2015-03-01 14:18:49+00:00): Did you mean to delete Middleton Mews in this changeset? It's now leaving a hole in my QA tool: 
http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=504895
dieterdreist (2015-02-25 09:19:44+00:00): something obviously went wrong here, either a software problem or vandalism
napo (2015-02-25 09:26:55+00:00): if you want play to create a imaginary world, you can move to opengeoficition http://www.opengeofiction.net
naoliv (2015-02-25 01:06:10+00:00): Wesley, porque você não conectou a rua com a escadaria? (e também a escadaria na outra rua)
noexit=yes só é para ser utilizado realmente quando não existe conexão da via com outra próxima e nem saída da mesma.
Skippern (2015-02-25 01:37:50+00:00): Corrigido https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29082984
wesleygmartins (2015-02-25 10:50:26+00:00): Sempre penso no OSM como base para os mapas da Garmin, esqueci que dá para usar para pedestre, bicicleta, ..., a partir de agora vou analisar melhor esses casos. Obrigado pelo aviso!
muralito (2015-02-26 01:02:22+00:00): En mi opinion debe ser mas detallado el wetland, por ejemplo no cubriendo toda la faja de la RN174 y alrededores que esta elevada y no es inundable.
saikabhi (2016-08-09 09:54:32+00:00): Hey Kevo, excellent work on adding such great data to OSM. Was going through updating and validating the turn restrictions using mapillary in this area and came across some restrictions which do not quite match the mapillary images: e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4627220/history. Can you please do a quick check around this area and confirm whether the turn restrictions are correct? Also will be great to know the source you have used to map these restrictions? For more information on the project we are working on, you can take a look at this ticket: https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/213. It will also be great to have your participation and feedback regarding it.

Cheers
Abhishek
Kevo (2016-08-09 11:53:33+00:00): Most of the restrictions like this are common sense for Ontario drivers and aren't signed.  The example you cite also has a solid white line until you're merged with the flow of traffic and the centre line is double solid yellow, making a left turn legally impossible.  Furthermore, there is a ramp a couple of hundred metres back for northbound Don Mills, so you wouldn't use this ramp do go northbound.
saikabhi (2016-08-10 08:52:10+00:00): Thank you the detailed explanation. Makes it a lot clearer.
pete9348 (2015-02-25 03:44:47+00:00): Added Bike Lane to 86th Street
mikecc (2015-03-01 11:55:46+00:00): Just a name tag w/o any POI or area has no much effect. There should be an additional tag which describes what it is about (here: tourism=hostel or =guest_house). 
And: Pls. use some uppercase chars. in the name.
nevw (2015-02-25 06:00:54+00:00): Sourced road name changes from Morton Bay Regional Council
PierZen (2015-02-28 19:32:07+00:00): Modifications systématiques aux règles sans d'abord en discuter avec la communauté. SVP venir discuter sur https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca
SomeoneElse (2015-05-27 18:26:21+00:00): Are there really two trig points together at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371439436/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1268963343/history ?  Last time I was there there was only one.
SomeoneElse (2015-03-01 11:43:48+00:00): Hello - I think that something went a bit wrong here - lots of ways west of Hailsham and Eastbourne were deleted.  I'm guessing that it was accidental since if these roads really had disappeared it'd have made the national news.

I've undone the deletion - see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29174882 - (so no need to worry about that), but I wonder if it would be possible to ask what happened?  Were you perhaps trying to create a map only showing some data but not others, or did something go a bit wrong in the editor?  If the latter, I'm sure that the people who wrote it would want to know more details.

Anyway, if there's anything that I can help with, please don't hesitate to get in contact.

Cheers,
Andy
MarcoR (2015-02-25 12:46:42+00:00): Use amenity=parking here

See also: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Parkplatz
Jonathan Bennett (2015-02-25 11:04:02+00:00): Hi David (assuming that's your name), welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing.

If you have the time, you could make your contributions even more useful by adding house numbers to the buildings you're adding. This will get shown on the map, and allows routing to give even more precise directions to a particular property.

I'm based in Guildford and know the area, so if you need any help just send me a message on OSM.
DavidEdmends (2015-02-25 12:11:33+00:00): Hi Jonathan,

Yes its David.

I'll try and add as a I go in future, I was just having a go with the UI as I was at a misisng maps event last night and didn't get a chance to get my hands dirty.

Its good to know there is another person locally contributing.

David
chnav (2015-02-26 09:22:11+00:00): Не надо удалять чужие данные и рисовать по-новой, надо всего лишь было подравнять здание.
maksim_pristupa (2015-02-26 09:25:19+00:00): ок, больше повторится, я тут новичок. сори.
MarcoR (2015-02-25 12:42:44+00:00): What type of memorial is it?

Maybe you should have used the tag historic=memorial

See also: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
Schramm (2015-02-25 13:21:36+00:00): Yes, it is a memorial. Now you can see the script as note. But i don´t know what ist the italien name.
MarcoR (2015-02-25 14:37:47+00:00): I added some tags and moved the note to memorial:text (which, I think, is a more appropriate tag for this kind of data).

Happy mapping ;)
dudka (2015-02-25 12:48:36+00:00): ця вулиця точно одностороння? як же ж з неї повернутися назад?
dudka (2015-02-25 12:44:29+00:00): потрібно підправити name:ru
зараз "name:ru"="Станиславского переулок; переулок Станиславского"
user_870861 (2016-08-08 20:14:57+00:00): hi,
between yours 2 (old ) changesets
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29089068
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29089884

there is about 600 exactly duplicated nodes (same geometry and same tags)
Petr Slavíček (2016-08-09 08:00:13+00:00): Where are the duplicates nodes? What is the problem?
user_870861 (2016-08-09 17:01:25+00:00): you can see some issues there :
http://dev.osmose.frontend.dirif.info/fr/map/#zoom=14&lat=50.32721&lon=16.35332&item=1230&class=3
Petr Slavíček (2016-08-10 09:02:54+00:00): 
Where is the problem? That someone writes a bad algorithm for Osmose? The names are different for bunker and bunkers really exist ....
user_870861 (2016-08-10 12:24:08+00:00): i'm sorry but look a this 2 nodes
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371652839
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371584420
as it's a bad work (like bad algorithm), what do you plan to do ?
Petr Slavíček (2016-08-10 13:28:51+00:00): Sorry, I see it! Two different nodes/points with the same coordinates and same attributes as a single object. Evening fix, there is the somewhat more. When I fixed, will send the information. Thank you
user_870861 (2016-08-10 14:10:39+00:00): i know that it is also difficult to explain than to understand this issues...
robert (2015-03-05 01:59:08+00:00): Did you mean to delete Cottam Hall Lane in this edit? http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=204564
Skyeb (2015-03-05 12:29:47+00:00): Hi Robert,

No I didn't mean to delete Cottam Hall lane, my only edits including the postbox opposite the Ancient Oak pub and the 88A bus routes. I didn't intentionally mean to delete anything if I have
owenkk (2015-02-25 12:04:54+00:00): mapped river
Endres Pelka (2015-12-13 13:44:34+00:00): Please do not mix farmyards with administrative boundaries.
gormo (2015-02-25 14:52:44+00:00): Hi, wieso hast du denn die Mikrowellen-Funkstrecke gelöscht? Gibts die nicht mehr?
Otnow (2015-02-25 15:53:54+00:00): Прошу обратить внимание на именование объектов (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87570021/history): тэг name=* используется если объект имеет имя собственное,а не нарицательное - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Names

Посмотрите какие типы зданий уже имеют свои обозначения: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building

Если не знаете как обозначить (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371670393/history), то отметьте объект и поставьте на него тэг note и запишите в него все что знаете об этом объекте. Позже либо вы сами узнаете как правильно обозначить этот объект и добавите подходящие тэги, либо другой участник это сделает.

Пользуйтесь поиском по wiki и форуму:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Main_Page

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21

Присмотритесь к редактору JOSM, он имеет русский язык и заготовки тэгов, в нем удобно работать со смещениями спутниковой подложки,: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:JOSM
Michel-nk (2015-02-26 06:33:29+00:00): Спасибо за указания. JOSM посмотрю как только будет побольше времени.
rab (2015-04-23 17:12:12+00:00): Hallo,
die Richtung der Einbahnstraßen kann so eigentlich nicht stimmen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330218572
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330218571
Wahrscheinlich müssen auch noch Abbiegebeschränkungen nachgetragen werden
ma-rt-in (2015-04-23 18:14:48+00:00): ja stimmt. Machst du das? :)
rab (2015-04-24 18:32:07+00:00): so stimmts hoffentlich
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30459984
sdoerr (2015-02-25 16:07:59+00:00): Must go down there and play 'spot the apostrophe'!
wbswang (2015-02-25 14:39:53+00:00): 新增街道名
philippec (2020-01-09 17:59:34+00:00): Ik zie hier geen drinkwaterfonteintje.
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/CYg2MPvDWjj1UAlrOl4lcY
frodrigo (2015-02-25 15:38:54+00:00): Je viens de voir que tu as ajouté une "chose" appellé "Nid", mais il manque la nature de l'objet. C'est quoi ?
flohoff (2015-02-25 17:01:18+00:00): Hi,
du hast leider keinen Changeset kommentar eingegeben so das ich erst suchen musste was du geändert hast.
Dein landuse ist so vermutlich nicht richtig. Das wird vermutlich noch in eine multipolygon relation müssen damit das sauber ist.
SolarTurtle (2015-02-25 15:38:44+00:00): Added street number.
Mike Baggaley (2017-04-09 07:36:52+00:00): HI, do you know whether this track is now open again? I noticed it because it allows access for bicycles but nothing else, which seems unusual.

Cheers,
Mike
c0d0 (2017-04-09 19:56:57+00:00): No I do not know the state of this track. I would think the construction project nearby (/way/32634772) is complete now, so the hopefully the track (which may now be an actual road now) should be available to the public. If someone has the opportunity, both features should be surveyed and updated.

Regarding access restrictions: I only added the `access` tags mainly to stop routing software from using this road. It is unintentional that the `bicycle` tag is there.

Looking at the wiki, I didn’t know that combining `access=no` and `bicycle=yes` would mean the track would allow bicycle thoroughfare but exclude all other forms of transport. I’m glad to now have a better understanding of the `access` tag…

(Interestingly it seems in practice GraphHopper interprets it this way, but Mapzen doesn’t.)

I shall remove the `bicycle` tag to remove this ambiguity.

Cheers, 
c0d0
abarta (2015-02-25 15:34:33+00:00): Updated building use-BMO Harris to Duluth Trading
SolarTurtle (2015-02-25 15:38:21+00:00): Added POI
AnyFile (2015-02-26 09:05:15+00:00): Turn restriction insert again with Changeset 29108914

Divieto di svolta reinserito con Changeset 29108914
Thalassin (2015-02-26 13:59:56+00:00): Hi, ich wollte nur mal kurz fragen, warum du die geplanten Straßen im oberen Teil der Marienhöhe rausgenommen hast.
clerie (2015-03-16 19:20:22+00:00): Die Wege existieren nicht. Ich war vor Ort und dies ist immernoch ein Acker.
MKnight (2015-02-25 20:11:14+00:00): Sehr schön, das ärgert mich schon seit Jahren diffus, demletzt rein zufällig ein Stück an der Ampelkreuzung Schwanseestrasse gefunden (und eingetragen) nun sieht das endlich vollständig aus.
animaux (2015-02-25 20:12:38+00:00): Eine Freude :)
Jojo4u (2015-02-26 17:05:05+00:00): Hallo 2010max, du hast 2x aerodrome am Flughafen Stuttgart getaggt. Der Flughafen existiert bereits, könntest du bitte deine zwei Nodes  wieder entfernen?

Freundliche Grüße, Joachim

Flughafen http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3925268
Aerodromes inkl. deiner: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/7Tm
Jojo4u (2015-03-02 08:34:04+00:00): Hallo 2010max, eines deiner überflüssigen aerodrome hast du entfernt, aber das andere ist immer noch da (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371993967)

Freundliche Grüße, Joachim
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
Skippern (2015-02-25 17:22:03+00:00): Acho trilhas que cruzam o gasoduto não deve compartilhar no no cruzamento?
LucFreitas (2015-02-25 17:30:36+00:00): Oi Skippern. Acidentalmente uni as trilhas no gasoduto, mas já estou corrigindo.
Skippern (2015-02-25 17:32:08+00:00): Achei fui sem querer
LucFreitas (2015-02-25 18:02:30+00:00): Uma dúvida: você sabe se é possível estas coberturas (building:roof)  serem renderizadas sobre o calçadão (highway:pedestrian / area:yes)? (Linhas: 330246966 e 330246967)
Skippern (2015-02-25 18:08:01+00:00): Nao se, mas se dar errado voce pode abre um ticket aqui: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues
LucFreitas (2015-02-25 18:10:53+00:00): Entendi, muito obrigado.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits