piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-04-12 19:16:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   In OSM Nederland gebruiken we uitsluitend de BAG adresnodes . Gebouwen worden geïmporteerd vanuit de data van het Kadaster.
Ik zal het in ieder geval uitlijnen met de kadasterdata.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-12 19:21:48+00:00): Het gebouw aangepast aan de huidige BAGdata en adres van omtrek verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
gscscnd (2022-04-13 08:13:03+00:00): highway=bus_stop powinno pozostać z public_transport=platform, nie powinno być przenoszone do public_transport=stop_position.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-20 21:07:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121260282 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some implausible mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6004 .
MxxCon (2022-04-13 07:27:31+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit?
Facebook page of this restaurant says that they relocated to 89-08 Queens Blvd, Elmhurst, NY 11373. Could you please explain why are you mapping it here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119634743
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Famlam (2022-04-12 18:50:53+00:00): Vergeten bron bij te werken: ook:
zicht uit trein, PDOK van voorgaande jaren (m.b.t. die container)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-13 05:55:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't overpainting existing objects. Please don't any stand names liek 'house'.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_2066394 (2022-04-12 23:20:41+00:00): Wo gehört der POI hin?
eggie (2022-04-12 19:25:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ChrissW-R1 (2024-12-25 12:27:22+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4562615
highflyer74 (2022-04-12 20:03:31+00:00): Moin Phxlxps!

Darf ich fragen, was Du in diesem Changeset geändert hast? Dein CS Kommentar "." sagt anderen Mappern leider nichts.

Beachte bitte, dass wir Wert auf aussagekräftige Changeset Kommentare legen. Das muss kein Roman sein, aber ein kurzer Satz, in dem man beschreibt, was man beabsichtigt hat. Schau Dir dazu bitte einmal folgende Links durch:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Danke!
user_5359 (2022-04-14 09:48:31+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte schau Dir mal den Weg https://www.osm.org/way/163703268 an: Die OSM Übersetzung von "Erlaubter Zugang" lautet access.
VA00 (2022-04-23 12:04:59+00:00): Coś się nie zgadza, trwa wyburzanie, jakiś wielki plac budowy powstaje.
user_6920396 (2022-04-24 06:25:31+00:00): Powstaje tu nowy wiadukt kolejowy w km 20,860 linii kolejowej nr 133. Właśnie nanosłem zmiany. A nie wiesz może jak w OSM wgrać własny podkład mapowy bo mam dokładny schemat tego wiaduktu wraz z drogą itp.
VA00 (2022-04-24 07:52:26+00:00): Chyba da się to zrobić w JOSM, ale sam nigdy tego nie robiłem. Spory wiadukt się szykuje...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Jrachi (2022-04-12 20:16:08+00:00): Scusate ho scritto 308 ma in realtà è il 308B.
ivanbranco (2022-04-14 21:23:07+00:00): Ciao Nicola, benvenuto su OSM :)

Ho trovato delle problematiche in questa modifica però:

1. hai cambiato il sito web con un sito web non raggiungibile, inoltre con www. invece che con https://www. come da standard OSM.
2. I nomi su OSM vanno sempre in versione estesa senza abbreviazioni. Qua hai sostituito il nome estero con "CAI" e inoltre hai scritto in minuscolo
3. hai cancellato i tag wikidata e operator
4. L'indirizzo e il nome della via devono essere identici, in questo caso in particolare anche l'indirizzo voleva il "Via" con la maiuscola quindi

Dovrei aver corretto tutti i problemi, se hai domande fai pure, buon mapping :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
JhowieNitnek (2022-05-08 08:41:01+00:00): Shouldn't it be expanded to Place Sainctelette?
https://fietssnelwegen.be/en/bicycle-highways/C20
Thierry1030 (2022-05-08 10:48:32+00:00): Dag Jhowie!
Het datamodel rond het mappen van de (Vlaamse) fietssnelwegen betreft enkel het grondgebied in "Vlaanderen".
Sinds deze week is er ook een fietssnelweg bewegwijzerd in Brussel, namelijk de C3 -> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=572797064181214
Laat ons eerst afspreken hoe we de fietssnelwegen op Brussels grondgebied juist mappen. Ik heb de vraag al in de chat gesteld. Vervoeg je ons daarbij? -> https://matrix.to/#/#osmbe-cyclenetworks:matrix.org
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-14 08:47:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051295802. What is the meaning of the tag working_hours=08?
danireload (2022-04-14 09:22:21+00:00): Hi! This number was mistyped. The information was corrected later. A believe the current information for this field in this building is correct. Thanks for the question
user_5359 (2022-04-14 09:25:56+00:00): If you change the working_hours to opening_hours: Could we delete the key working_hours?
danireload (2022-04-14 09:58:06+00:00): Now I see, sorry for the confusion. I thought we were talking about the same key, due to translation, Sure, the misused key can be deleted. Thanks for the clarification
user_5359 (2022-04-13 05:57:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/4264443903 over 100 meters, please check the position.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
legofahrrad (2022-04-16 18:35:50+00:00): Moin!
Ich habe gerade diesen Punkt ohne Eigenschaften entdeckt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9661669119
Da habe ich gesehen, dass du ihn erst vor vier Tagen erstellt hast und wollte mal fragen, ob das beabsichtigt war. ;)

Beste Grüße!
legofahrrad
hfs (2022-04-18 09:18:19+00:00): Hi legofahrrad,
nein, das war keine Absicht, Entschuldigung! Ich habe den Knoten jetzt gelöscht. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Beste Grüße und Happy Mapping
hfs
Tomas Straupis (2022-04-13 05:29:53+00:00): landuse=orchard yra sodo žemėnauda, du vaismedžiai vidury miesto nėra orchard, tai vis tiek residential.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 11:16:14+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=coffee_shop;l
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9661682303/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=coffee_shop
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
legofahrrad (2022-04-15 16:40:53+00:00): Bitte ließ dir folgenden Wiki-Artikel durch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
nw520 (2022-04-18 23:00:14+00:00): Hallo goodidea. An dieser Stelle mal ein kleiner Hinweis, falls du nicht schon bereits kontaktiert wurdest, dass Benutzer wsoroe mit Änderungssatz c1050445383 alle Instanzen von guard_rail:smooth_side gelöscht hat.
Beste Grüße
nw520 (2022-04-18 23:09:11+00:00): Falsche ID, hier der korrekte Changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/119807697
holly76 (2022-04-12 21:36:06+00:00): https://freeactivationkeys.org/
eggie (2022-04-13 09:13:52+00:00): Oke..JOSM!  Ziet er netjes uit, maar als je goed kijkt sluit landuse en water toch niet goed aan. Het overlapt of er zit ruimte tussen.
Met een truukje kun je dat netjes laten aansluiten. Ik draai dan de plugin Polygon CutOut.
Dan trek ik de landuse iets over het water .. selecteer het water en draai in JOSM de plugin.
Dan komt alles netjes aan elkaar te liggen. Lege nodes die je overhoudt kun je verwijderen met hesrtsel nadat je de validator draait. 
Anders moet je steeds die twee nodes opzoeken en op M (merge) drukken. Dat kan ook.
Kijk eens hier naar de uitleg
PolygonCutOut 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=723861#p723861 

Succes,
eggie
eggie (2022-04-13 09:16:53+00:00): Hier wat leesvoer over plugins https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Plugins
Polygon CutOut van KiaaTIX staat er ook tussen. 
In Josm kun je 'm installeren.
holly76 (2022-04-12 21:41:52+00:00): https://freeactivationkeys.org/aomei-partition-assistant-crack/
Frans S (2022-04-16 09:18:30+00:00): Hello. I've send you some time ago a remark about your mapping quality. Please improve them. What I see now is that you still map inaccurate and not squared.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119640382
DressyPear4 (2022-04-12 21:57:51+00:00): Adicione um comentário em suas edições, ajuda outros a entender melhor o que está sendo modificado
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119640405
TheBestIdea (2022-06-15 17:14:12+00:00): Hey hdevine825,

Curious what's going on here with the DeKalb bike lane? I ride it all the time and it is one way for bikes (just like cars) and is not contraflow. I'ma fix that, but lmk if you have any concerns.

Thanks,

Brandon
hdevine825 (2022-06-15 17:30:52+00:00): Thank you for catching this. The changeset came from StreetComplete and I'm not quite sure what I selected to make it add those tags. I will have to find another bike lane quest and see what it does.
lyctkel (2025-11-26 06:16:19+00:00): Hi JeroenvanderGun,
Ik heb een tegenstrijdigheid opgemerkt in de tags van way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051387269. Enerzijds zijn fietsen uitdrukkelijk uitgesloten van de geslotenverklaring, anderzijds wordt hier access=permissive, horse=private en bicycle=permissive aangegeven.
Ik zie geen beperking voor voetgangers en fietsers (bij paarden ben ik niet zeker, maar paarden zijn ook geen voertuigen) en zou hier 
bicycle=yes en horse=yes vermelden. De tag access lijkt me  niet nodig.
Groet,
lyctkel
JeroenvanderGun (2025-11-26 20:47:40+00:00): Uit de bebording van de militaire basis blijkt dat dit eigen wegen zijn, vandaar access=permissive.

Op dit specifieke stuk weg staat bovendien een verkeersbord C1 met een uitzondering voor militair verkeer, vandaar vehicle=private en horse=private (bord C1 geldt ook voor ruiters).

Onder het bord C1 staat ook een uitzondering voor fietsers vermeldt, dus moet er weer bicycle=permissive bij om vehicle=private te overschrijven.

De algemene tag access=permissive wordt nu dus overschreven voor vehicle en horse, en nog een keer voor bicycle, maar blijft nodig voor voetgangers die niet onder vehicle/horse/bicycle vallen.
lyctkel (2025-11-27 06:42:28+00:00): Aha, ik was me er niet van bewust en heb er daarom ook niet aan gedacht dat het militaire terrein niet alleen binnen de omheining ligt, maar ook daarbuiten. De bewegwijzering staat ook iets verder weg (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.1088817623&lng=4.322933619799983&z=19.48384982394855&pKey=2297731170361611&focus=photo&x=0.5200540864896082&y=0.6002023566488333&zoom=0). Daarmee is de tegenstrijdigheid naar mijn mening opgehelderd. Bedankt voor het uitgebreide antwoord.
lyctkel (2025-11-27 06:50:00+00:00): PS: Ik heb de weg aangevuld met de volgende note:

note=Een meer gedetailleerde motivering  voor access=permissive is te vinden in de volgende changeset discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119640920
JeroenvanderGun (2025-11-27 20:47:34+00:00): Prima!

Een vergelijkbaar bord staat overigens ook al nabij de bushalte: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.10819130300001&lng=4.322853069749954&z=19.48384982394855&pKey=515210499514257&focus=photo&x=0.7178830342306364&y=0.523068520060813&zoom=1.3182779490727579

Deze borden zijn zogenaamde aanduidingsborden conform artikel 21 van de Verkeersregeling Defensie: https://wetten.overheid.nl/jci1.3:c:BWBR0043001&paragraaf=4&artikel=21&z=2021-03-10&g=2021-03-10
lyctkel (2025-11-27 21:00:23+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip. Er valt altijd wel iets te leren.
MxxCon (2022-04-13 07:45:09+00:00): This was a multi-part building from which you deleted some tags.. Such tags are important for 3D map rendering. You can read about his here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119641198
os-emmer (2024-03-10 12:25:43+00:00): Hi SherbetS,
you mapped here something using emergency=disaster_response before the proposal for this tag got approved. Can you confirm that this object fits to the current definition in the wiki?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9661821977
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=disaster_response
einufo (2026-02-05 18:48:33+00:00): Hallo Peter,
der Link "https://www.nordkurier.de/mueritz/buchholzer-kirche-will-fahrradkirche-werden-1047793404.html" läuft ins Leere.
Gruß Tino
Map-Peter (2026-02-06 00:07:01+00:00): Hallo Tino,
 
was genau willst du, mit dieser Nachricht an mich, bewirken?
 
Gruß Peter
einufo (2026-02-06 07:51:03+00:00): Hallo Peter,
ich pfusche ungern in Daten herum, die andere bearbeitet haben. Deswegen habe ich den Link nicht gelöscht und dachte, dass Du das eventuell übernimmst.
Gruß Tino