piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Eddie Cannon (2021-07-25 15:11:39+00:00): I read this guidance for hotels: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel

and in it, it says to do this: As a campus
Draw an area for the campus of the hotel, comprising buildings and outdoor areas. Apply tourism=hotel.
Draw the area(s) for the building(s) inside the campus, and tag them with building=* according to their typology.

Are you saying put building=hotel?
aweech (2021-07-25 16:56:12+00:00): As the Wiki says, they should be tagged according to what sort of building it is. The building tag reflects the original use, so purpose-built hotels should be tagged with building=hotel. Hotels that are repurposed from other things (like a church or a house), would have a building tag like building=church or building=detached. If you don't know the history of the building, then building=yes is totally fine.
eggie (2021-07-24 13:57:00+00:00): Hoi

Niet correct nog.. 
Je edits

Nog even kijken dus
Het moet zijn
highway=proposed
proposed=busway

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-07-24 14:21:36+00:00): Je edits  .. hier dan nog even https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108532774
Vergelijk het even met bovenstaande.
MRoemer99 (2021-07-24 21:49:17+00:00): Aha ik zie het, excuus.
Heb het aangepast.
Bedankt!
Grass-snake (2022-06-01 15:24:00+00:00): Добрый день, пишу по поводу Автостанции Солнечногорск.
1. Для идентификации платформ на станции вы используете ref=1/2/3/4/5/6.
В Вики написано
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
ref=*
Reference of the bus stop, if bus stop has it - usually a series of letters and numbers used to find the stop on digitized systems.
Идентификатор автобусной остановки, если она есть - обычно это серия букв и цифр, используемая для поиска остановки в цифровых системах.
(Судя по всему это для идентификации в глобальных системах и базах данных).

local_ref=*
Short reference of the bus stop - "A", "D1" for example
Краткое обозначение автобусной остановки - например, "A", "D1"

Подскажите, я могу убрать тег ref с  платформы и заменить его на local_ref на месте остановки? Или хотя бы дублировать этот тег на обе точки?
Steve_32 (2022-06-03 12:22:07+00:00): Grass-snake, привет.
Я не думаю, что ref - это идентификатор в глобальном масштабе. В вики это явно не указано. Обычно, local_name/local_ref применяется как дополнение, в тех случаях, когда основной тег уже занят. Поэтому в вики указано, что ref - Important, local_ref - Optional.
Предположу, что платформа с одним номером может иметь несколько нумерованных посадочных мест.
И если говорить о применяемости по России - везде используется именно ref (смотри, например, ЖД транспорт).
Grass-snake (2022-06-03 16:53:06+00:00): Понял, тогда ещё вопрос:
2. я могу указать
name=Автостанция Солнечногорск
на этом отношении и на 2 автобусных остановках рядом?
Steve_32 (2022-06-06 21:07:46+00:00): Сходил, посмотрел, что написано на самой остановке: она называется просто "Автостанция". И на официальном сайте Мострансавто - так же: https://mostransavto.ru/raspisanie/159/
Поэтому, давай лучше так и оставим. (имя в отношении надо будет исправить...)
А вот непосредственно саму автостанцию я назвал "Солнечногорск", потому-что по правилам, слова-категории объектов не пишутся в name.
motogs (2021-09-06 11:51:07+00:00): Hi DaveGeog,
I see that it was just 6 or 7 weeks ago that you created way 967021899.
I tried to walk along it on Saturday from the SW end but NE from the rear of No.120 was completely overgrown, and I had to turn back.
I didn’t approach from the northerly corner of the way, but I could see from Harborough Avenue that the whole of the SE-NW section was clear for 2-track vehicles.
On a slightly different note, you may feel that highway=track
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Track
is inappropriate and that highway=service, service=alley
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley
is more suitable.
If you agree, let me know if you’ll make the changes or if you’d like me to do it.
Cheers,
motogs
DaveGeog (2021-09-06 12:21:50+00:00): Hi motogs
Thanks.  I was walking Days Lane to create all the numbered house footprints on that visit, with a few dips into the tracks/alleys, but did not attempt to walk the full length of this section: very happy for you to update it to reflect the situation on the ground as I'm not in that neighbourhood very often. 

These back lanes are variously tagged by different contributors as tracks/service roads/alleys, but reviewing that link I agree it's not on open land so probably should be service=alley, but there would be a lot of tracks in Bexley might need reclassification - e.g. is it really different to the track in your changeset  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104580282#map=17/51.44334/0.11295
motogs (2021-09-06 14:24:27+00:00): Hi DaveGeog,
Thanks for coming back so quickly.
I did wonder if you'd find an inconsistency with anything I've done!  I'm sure there's lots that aren't right and I'm always happy to have that pointed out.  I'll do a search for any 'track' tags I've created and change them, as I regard that tag as a mistake for this type of highway.  The one in the changeset you refer to that appears as though I created it was actually split from a longer existing way (in the Shuttle Riverway" relation) but I didn't delete the existing tagging. The 'track' tags in the other ways on that changeset were also created by others.  I'm generally loath to make changes without going back to the originator.
I only really mentioned this one as an aside while I was mentioning the overgrowth problem.
I'll look for other 'track' tags for highways local to me and consider whether to change them.
Cheers,
motogs
muralito (2021-07-24 23:57:57+00:00): Sugiro que você entre em contato com o responsável pelo changeset para que não repita os critérios errados. 

Eles são mapeamentos organizados e pode haver vários mapeadores de "cadeira" seguindo os mesmos critérios.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2021-07-24 17:45:03+00:00): Hey, since you've recently edited that playground, it has some strange
roof:levels, roof:shape, building:levels tags. Do you think they could be removed?
user_417306 (2021-07-29 21:59:00+00:00): Thank you, possibly automatically added by the tool used (Go Map!! 2.2.1 for iOS). Can be removed.
Supaplex030 (2022-09-26 12:42:02+00:00): Hallo wsoroe,

du hast hier in Berlin schon vor längerer Zeit massenhaft colour-Werte gelöscht. Bin durch Zufall gerade auf dieses CS gestoßen und ärgere mich gerade sehr darüber (mit Ausnahme der wenigen sinnvollen Verbesserungen/Korrekturen). Die gelöschten Values in der Semikolon-Schreibweise sind maschinell interpretierbar und nicht falsch, auch wenn die meisten Anwendungen nichts damit anfangen können. Weh tut es aber auch nicht. Die Semikolon-Schreibweise ist in OSM nichts außergewöhnliches.

Wenn du ein Problem mit solchen mehrfarbigen Ausdrücken hast, dann denke dir doch ein alternatives Tagging-Schema aus, aber bitte lösche die Informationen nicht einfach. Qualitativ hast du den OSM-Datenbestand mMn hier verschlechtert.

Daher werde ich das CS perspektivisch unter Beibehaltung der sinnvollen Korrekturen zurücksetzen.
Polarbear (2022-09-26 20:15:57+00:00): Im CS wurden auch ganze Gebäude und Landuses gelöscht. 
Warum dies, und inwiefern ist die Quelle für das Löschen von Gebäuden das OSM Wiki?
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-07-20 12:20:14+00:00): Thank you!
I've just saw your improvement.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-30 10:37:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6541074639/history has shop = smoke that was added in this edit
Is it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dheadshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dsmartshop ?

Or maybe it sells e-cigarettes and is shop=e-cigarette ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3De-cigarette )?

Or maybe shop=tobacco is the best fit ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtobacco )?

Or is it a separate shop category that should be documented as valid?
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-07-24 14:34:07+00:00): Accidentally used old changeset comment. Meant to note that I added details from survey, using Bing sat imagery as a reference.
vulasala (2021-07-26 03:46:07+00:00): Hi Kri_ttt,
Trust you are doing well. I have added building cover tag as the way 967423027 and way 967034888 overlapping with buildings.
Thanks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108535782
DeBigC (2021-07-25 22:40:05+00:00): What exactly are you doing? You need to state what roof tag you are blitzing please. Im aware of one that keeps causing problems, but you are meant to be more specific when you do such big mass edits, and you should talk to us through our chapter to let us know you are hitting a big  nuclear change button.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-26 10:31:54+00:00): Hello DeBigC,

You're right, I should have contacted the Irish community for a changeset of this size. I thought that updating duplicate and deprecated tags was a helpful thing. I'll share some relevant documentation with you:

I updated ~50% of building:roof:shape tags, there used to be nearly 100k. Other changes were not that large. Both Taginfo and Wiki already show clear preferences for certain tags. I made the data more consistent. 

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/building:roof:shape/roof:shape 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/building:roof:colour/roof:colour
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/building:roof:material/roof:material
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/building:roof_shape/roof:shape
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/building:roof:levels/roof:levels
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/building:roof:height/roof:height
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building%3Aroof#values

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:roof:shape
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:colour
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:material#Possible_tagging_mistakes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height#Possible_tagging_mistakes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
DeBigC (2021-07-27 13:45:08+00:00): Ok, I agree with those changes but I would highly recommend to you that you alert people to changes you are going to make. I was working on buildings at the time you did that and because I edit slowly and methodically in Dublin I was wondering why an editing conflict happened on a few of my objects. Being mannerly I relented on my changes and left yours in place. Please don't map like this again in Ireland without first dropping an email to board@openstreetmap.ie or jump into our Telegram group. Its not what you do its the way that you do it. I bet if you asked first nobody would have a problem. Not trying to be unfriendly, so take this in the right way please.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-27 16:07:44+00:00): Dear DeBigC,

Thank you very much for your patience and understanding with my abrupt changes. My apologies for causing conflicts in your edits and for not consulting the Irish community beforehand. I'll be very sure to do that next time I'm planning large edits specifically in and around Ireland. 

If you wish to join a broader discussion about the legitimacy of similar map edits, there's currently an OSM-Talk mailing list discussion going under the title "[OSM-talk] Mechanical Edit?", sparked by another changeset that I created.

Best regards

Casper
syntex (2022-02-11 20:04:04+00:00): Co to jest?
starsep (2022-02-11 20:07:27+00:00): Galeria Sztuki https://spotw.pl/pl
philippec (2021-07-24 17:00:11+00:00): Torhout stadhuis, aed is zijn emergency tag kwijt.
Dat is dus 1 van de redenen waarom ik een aed nooit in een muur zet.
tekim (2021-07-25 03:45:54+00:00): Please limit the geographic extent of your changesets to a more reasonable size
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108536838
mapman44 (2021-07-25 14:24:53+00:00): Sorry for the problem. But I don't understand what happened. The other 999 changesets were fine. ;-)
tekim (2021-07-25 14:36:03+00:00): Thanks, I understand things happen.
Super-Map (2021-07-28 05:24:15+00:00): Hi  trial, nice to represent: "Laïta Croisières", but you haven't yet follow the OSM rules... as the result we have a message error on the software for this way: "N°967039901", please check it and correct it asap. Thanks for your understanding. (at the first the way itself mustn't have a self intersection...)
trial (2021-07-28 06:14:43+00:00): Hi, I saw this message (thanks to Osmose) and checked. IMHO it's a false positive, the ferry does back and forth. What should I do if any? Move the "back" part of the trip? The ferry is using the same path (well depending on the tide not necessary but almost. Is it an issue for some software?
Super-Map (2021-07-28 07:05:28+00:00): Hi again, thanks for your fast answer, I'm not a "teacher" ans as many contributors, I'm just contributors (an huge) and receive no wage for this task... But like I'm a "kind" person (but not always if I must be in front of stupid behaviours...) I would like to say to you, first all ways mustn't have a self intersection and this is the case but it isn't only the only "trouble"... there is a "wiki"... it open for all like this wonderful but so often misunderstanding project named OSM! But you know we living all in dangerous world and maybe it's better like this... do you follow me? Have a nice day.
Super-Map (2021-07-28 07:14:20+00:00): I would like to add, if a wiki exist, if lot of rules must be respected in OSM, it's because this map is an "OPEN" project and all data can be used and interpreted by many "software" (and users) and if you don't respect the rules (involuntary; I hope so) so your work is useless because it can't "work"!...
trial (2021-07-28 11:53:45+00:00): With 10 years of contributions, many wiki edits, I know the existence of the wiki. thank you. BTW, if not, it would have been nice to give the URL ;-).
Of course I could split the ways in 2 parts and create a relation of both parts. It would be, on a topologic point of view, identical. BTW, a point was missing in one direction, creating probably this self intersecting way. Not knowing they were supposed to crash, the main tile servers rendered the data properly.
Super-Map (2021-07-28 12:11:23+00:00): Translation: "BTW"??????
Like you I'm a contributor on an "open project" and I do that "freely" without to have any wage, but I help this project for to go "forward" and be functional with lot of software... I'm not a "teacher"... and... there is numerous persons who "work" on this project since "years" without to have the will to see this project "functional" too quickly... stupid behaviours... Of course some "persons" receive a "wage" working on this project and not only, the most of time they are equally: "computer scientist"... and it isn't because you have had this luck to study this "science" than you're able to map "correctly"... and some persons haven't yet this will... But I insist, it's an "open project" with no profit "purpose"! Sharing for all of us, but you know in USA, and many Country around the world, there is so many bad behaviours and like all good things, this project mustn't fall between "bad hands", isn't it?!
trial (2021-07-28 16:38:08+00:00): BTW = by the way, sorry I've worked too long with people from Washington DC ;-). As you guess I also do it on a freely basis and don't appreciate some trends to use our work to make a closed project à la GM.
Super-Map (2021-07-29 10:39:47+00:00): Your welcome, as your able to tell, it's an "open project" everyone is fully FREE to learn... And from me, many persons are too much "TRAVELLERS", and think only one thing: "them own interest" and want all the "merit"... We have all our own story in each country on this planet... I have my own reason to work on this project or not... Have a nice day.
emvee (2021-09-01 13:49:35+00:00): Hoi Multichil,

Bedankt voor het bijwerken van de Rozenstraat, bicycle=no was inderdaad niet juist.

cycleway:left=use_sidepath is alleen niet juist, use_sidepath in combinatie met bicycle(*)=

Ik heb cycleway:left=use_sidepath en oneway:bicyle=no weggehaald, zo worden fietsers in west-oost richting ook automatisch over het fietspad geleid. Zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110569075

Groeten,

Martin.
LarsBG (2021-07-24 15:46:42+00:00): youtu.be/-5aswuBsgrc?t=226
Mannivu (2021-07-26 15:58:04+00:00): Ciao. Il commento del gruppo di modifiche dovrebbe essere meno generico di "Ulteriori dettagli", in modo che altri utenti possano recuperarlo velocemente tra migliaia di modifiche. Sarebbe più utile descrivere cosa hai cambiato, se hai aggiunto o rimosso qualcosa.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108538488
fghj753 (2021-07-24 19:09:07+00:00): Parandatud. Review no longer needed.
gurglypipe (2021-07-24 17:47:26+00:00): Thanks for your edits today to Heysham golf course. They all look useful and correct, and your more detailed changeset comments make it easier to check the changes. Thanks for taking the time to work on this :)
Strubbl (2021-07-24 20:18:28+00:00): Hi EUradfahrer, die Adresse für die Veronastraße 10 und 12 sind nun doppelt, weil sie schon am Gebäude gemappt waren. Sollten die dort lieber weggenommen werden?
EUradfahrer (2021-07-25 12:36:20+00:00): Hallo Strubbl,
da es sich um ein Gebäude mit mehreren Eingängen handelt, ist meine Erwartung, dass die Adressen als Adresspunkt oder Eingang gemapped werden.
Es ist mir nicht klar, warum 10 und 12 (und auch 14 und 16) als 2 verschiedene Gebäude gemapped wurden.
Das Gebäude mit der "L"-Form direkt darunter hat auch mehrere Eingänge mit unterschiedlichen Hausnummern, die einfach als "Adresspunkte" abgebildet werden; man kann dieses Gebäude auch nicht einfach aufteilen.
Ob es Probleme gibt, wenn die Adressinformationen mehrfach vorhanden sind, weiß ich nicht, aber bei einer Suche findet man diese Adressen nun doppelt. Ich halte es daher für besser, sie aus den Gebäuden zu löschen.

Beste Grüße,
EUradfahrer
Martin2035 (2021-07-24 19:59:09+00:00): Díky moc! Zrovna dneska jsem to viděl a chtěl jsem to zanést, a koukám, už to tady je! :)
DD1GJ (2021-07-24 18:12:20+00:00): revert 108540527, 108540670
Bitte zerstörte Brücke nicht löschen, sindern gemaß dem Lebenszyklus-Präfix "unsichtbar" mache. Nzúr dadurch ist es möglich, eine Übersicht zu bekommen, was alles zerstört wurde

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108541698
noelbov (2021-07-24 20:31:21+00:00): - Staan daar aanduidingen dat daar niet mag gefietst worden? Ook niet op mtb?
- Staan er dan wegomleidingen voor recreatieve fietsers die van knooppunt 96 naar 98 of omgekeerd willen rijden?

Met dank voor antwoord.
RockyTDR (2021-07-24 21:54:00+00:00): Blijkbaar zou het Muldershof effectief deel zijn van een mountainbikeroute (bordje staat op de hoek van Balegemstraat en Muldershof). Ik zie ook dat het officieel deel zou zijn van het fietsknooppuntnetwerk.
Vermits het pad zelf maar 1 meter breed is en er langs beide zijden afsluitingen staan, is het onmogelijk om 2 fietsers (of een fietser en voetganger) veilig te laten kruisen. Optimale route om te fietsen is via Pastorieberg.
Ik ben van plan om de "officiële" fiets- en mountainbikeroute te laten aanpassen omdat ik het onverantwoord vind dat wandelaars en fietsers gemengd worden op een wandelpad.
noelbov (2021-07-25 13:05:50+00:00): Beste,
Ik sta volledig achter uw veiligheidsoverwegingen, maar denk dat het voorlopig -alvorens u deze officiële fietsroute hebt laten aanpassen- beter is dit wegsegment van een kleine 100 m toch terug open te stellen om diverse routeplanners niet in de war te sturen of fouten te laten genereren.
Daarom heb ik tag bicycle terug op yes gezet en tevens de breedte van dit wegje aangegeven, zoals u het vermeld hebt in bovenstaande reactie.
Met vriendelijke groeten
RockyTDR (2021-07-25 13:28:43+00:00): Dank je wel! 
Hier zijn trouwens een aantal foto's ter info: https://photos.app.goo.gl/UvZ4TVusNg2g4hZz5
(genomen in omgekeerde volgorde, maar het toont wel hoe smal het pad is en hoe het vanaf de Poststraat bijna niet zichtbaar is).
noelbov (2021-07-27 12:46:13+00:00): Een geluk dat er aan weerskanten geen pinnekesdraad staat gespannen met daartussen nog wat brandnetels, zoals ik al ooit ben tegengekomen ...
G1asshouse (2021-07-26 02:14:41+00:00): The wiki for building:roof:shape very explicitly asks you not to do what you've done here (and with other tags).

Here is a link to the page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:roof:shape?uselang=en

Here is the warning:
"Under no circumstances should you (semi-)automatically change “deprecated” tags to something else in the database on a large scale without conforming to the Automated Edits code of conduct. Any such change will be reverted."
Lee Carré (2021-07-27 12:05:08+00:00): What G1asshouse said, plus (once again) smaller changeset areas, please(!)
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-27 17:48:05+00:00): > "You are still free to continue to use or interpret this tag as you see fit"

I interpret this tag as a tagging mistake or deprecated variant of roof:shape=* and I use it to find roof shapes for buildings and building parts. 

How (else) would you interpret it?
G1asshouse (2021-07-27 23:38:03+00:00): “How (else) would you interpret it?”
I know that you are quite aware, the warning specifically and clearly puts a limit on what actions mappers can take. “interpret” color as “deprecated” all day long but “Under no circumstances should you (semi-)automatically change “deprecated” tags…”
 
You’re a very disingenuous person. You do not interact with the community in good faith. You constantly ask questions that you have no interest in the answers to. You dismiss people’s concerns like a horse swats flies. You and the few that are like you destroy the very foundation of this project. It may sound like hyperbole yet a group project, like OSM, requires that members of the group value and respect the opinions and concerns of the other project members. This whole thing is very disheartening.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-27 23:53:28+00:00): Dear G1asshouse,

Your personal accusations mean nothing to me.

Best regards

Casper
Lee Carré (2021-07-28 20:32:20+00:00): “Your personal accusations mean nothing to me.”

He tried to reason with you (in multiple changeset discussions), but you didn't like that either.
Thus, not only must I concur with his conclusions of you, but also point out that you confirm them by demonstrating the problem he describes in your dismissal of his observations.

Like I said (in the lengthy, ~26 comment discussion); can't reason with unreasonable people.

Perhaps you're a troll, methinks.

Otherwise, why are you here?

I wonder if you'll respond with anything other than fallacies.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-29 09:46:05+00:00): Dear Lee Carré,

Your personal accusations don't mean anything to me either. That long message you sent me earlier was a lot more constructive, though, so I don't mind replying to that properly when I have the time. 

Best regards

Casper
user_5359 (2022-08-22 05:53:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/129771358/history. What is the correct roof:shape?
Friendly_Ghost (2022-08-22 17:48:30+00:00): Hello! Thank you for reviewing. 
Judging from BDOrtho IGN imagery, it looks like a half-hipped roof. That may explain why Porphyrion couldn't make a good choice between hipped and gabled. I took the liberty to update the tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125238414

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape%3Dhalf-hipped for documentation.
user_2066394 (2021-07-25 15:23:37+00:00): Technisch aber ein kleiner Parkplatz?
Andreas Binder (2021-07-25 15:36:34+00:00): Eher nicht. Im Naturschutzgebiet ist Parken nur auf den ausgeschilderten Parkplätzen erlaubt und dies wäre hier nicht der Fall. Ob ein Platz ein Parkplatz ist, wäre weniger eine technische Frage, sondern eine Berechtigungsfrage.
user_2066394 (2021-07-25 15:54:51+00:00): Einwandfrei, dann  war das eine subjektive Einschätzung vom Mitteiler
ZeLonewolf (2021-07-24 18:13:37+00:00): JOSM swallowed my commit message.  Changeset comment should have said "Fix tagging issues on Ohio boundaries"