piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mstew354 (2021-08-02 20:06:15+00:00): I was trying to find the use trail going southbound when I was hiking there last weekend but couldn't find one based on where its shown on OSM. Strava heatmap kinda shows people using lots of different paths? If there is a use trail, maybe its further west than what was shown on OSM?
https://imgur.com/a/95dMjly
OddlyAngled (2021-08-02 20:15:49+00:00): k, it does look like a mess up there these days.
Troels Arvin (2021-07-30 10:28:00+00:00): Hej Jørn. Jeg kan se, at du har fjernet nogle adresse-tags fra tre nodes, som jeg har tilføjet. De respektive vejnumre (såsom Hundested Havn 4 og Nørregade 23D) findes simpelthen ikke i OSM; derfor tænkte jeg, at det ville give lidt værdi at lægge adressetags på. Men har vi i DK en general politik på området, som jeg bør kende? /Troels
Jørn-osm (2021-07-30 21:23:21+00:00): Alle adresser i OSM bliver automatisk opdateret. Det sker via autoAWS fra Danmarks Adresse Register (DAR). Er en adresse forkert eller mangler skal kommunen have besked, da det er dem der retter i DAR. En ændring vil så automatisk blive importeret til OSM via autoAWS fra DAR.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS
Troels Arvin (2021-07-30 22:56:37+00:00): OK, tak. Et nærmere kig afslører, at kun Nørregade 23D mangler i DAR i skrivende stund. Jeg har gjort Halsnæs Kommune opmærksom på det.
Patchi (2021-07-30 22:05:54+00:00): Bonjour Megatofou,

Un nombre assez important de lignes de transports en commun passe par la place Malherbe. Est-ce que ces lignes passent toujours par celle-ci avec l'ajout de barrières et d'un access = private sur la route secondaire ?

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
Megatofou (2021-07-31 06:05:02+00:00): Bonjour, je ne me suis pas intéressé aux lignes de transport en commun (en vacances en voiture), mais la zone est fermée donc les lignes de bus ont dû changer. La zone est désormais réservée aux ayants-droit et fermée par des barrières. Je n'ai pas fait tout le tour mais on semble être passée en zone piétonne sur la vielle ville. Un certain nombre de rues ont des plots pour empêcher le passage des voitures et c'est récent car on voit encore clairement les marques de sens unique au sol ou autre...
marc__marc (2022-09-03 12:53:10+00:00): Bonjour,
ce petit mot pour vous rapeller que GoogleMap n'est pas une source valide pour OpenStreetMap à cause de leur licence d'utilisation.
Pour les batiments, il y a la couche cadastre ou les couches d'imagerie.
Si le batiment n'est pas encore visible sur ceux-ci, il faut aller sur le terrain
Cordialement,
Marc
impiaaa (2021-07-29 00:11:21+00:00): This changeset used nodes from a forest to create street-lining trees. Please do not reuse nodes for unrelated objects.
impiaaa (2021-07-29 00:08:15+00:00): This changeset uses nodes from a service way to create buildings. Please do not reuse nodes for unrelated objects.
Liger-Atlantel (2021-07-29 08:26:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Good_changeset_comments
watmildon (2023-06-06 04:19:58+00:00): Just wanted to say the work on this park is great! So crisp!!
prudhraj (2021-08-02 16:13:55+00:00): Hi "txemt ", please help us understand the reason behind deleting these road segments. While mapping these road segments, we have considered all the OSM norms. 
Thank You.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108783199
AngocA (2021-11-12 03:07:18+00:00): Hola Juan, aquí modificaste una relación de límites administrativos poniendo propiedades del negocio que modificaste.
prudhraj (2021-08-02 16:13:48+00:00): Hi "txemt ", please help us understand the reason behind deleting these road segments. While mapping these road segments, we have considered all the OSM norms. 
Thank You.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108783350
prudhraj (2021-08-02 16:13:39+00:00): Hi "txemt ", please help us understand the reason behind deleting these road segments. While mapping these road segments, we have considered all the OSM norms. 
Thank You.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108783708
marczoutendijk (2021-07-31 19:42:21+00:00): All the fake bike rental stations created by this user (in many changesets) have been deleted by the DWG.
This user is now blocked and the DWG is waiting for their explanation.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
tastrax (2021-08-02 05:41:20+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
prudhraj (2021-08-02 16:13:29+00:00): Hi "txemt ", please help us understand the reason behind deleting these road segments. While mapping these road segments, we have considered all the OSM norms. 
Thank You.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108783983
Arlo James Barnes (2024-06-07 21:32:00+00:00): Thanks for resolving the fixme. I swapped the `wikidata` tag for the theater but otherwise left it as-is.
felipeeugenio (2021-07-29 13:05:22+00:00): Hola.
Los route=ferry son ruteables. En caso de autos son básicamente una calle. En caso de los peatones es como que fuera un footway. Para que sirvan realmente los ferrys que agregas debes conectarlos a la red de caminos.

Veo que los estás dejando conectados a un pier (que está bien fisicamente), pero no a un camino.

ve por favor el paso del canal de chacao.

Me tomé la libertad de intervenir este ultimo que hiciste y dejar lo pier como highway=service además. Lo que puede que esté mal y solo sea un footway, por lo que ruego corregir.
saludos
jackripper1 (2021-07-29 14:05:52+00:00): Gracias. No había podido resolver el error, pese a que no tuve problemas con otras rutas marítimas que he creado.
Saludos.
felipeeugenio (2021-07-29 14:56:15+00:00): probablemente porque había ya una via en el muelle sin que te dieras cuenta. En Calbuco hay un footway

por favor cambiar a service si acaso pueden subirse autos.

saludos
whb (2024-01-12 19:09:53+00:00): Hi brenoj20,

can you please explain what the "Silence Town" is? Are there any information boards?

Best regards
whb
SomeoneElse (2021-07-30 11:37:04+00:00): Hello 北京的睡袋,
In this changeset you've added a "1" to the end of the name of http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=478984382 .  This seems an odd change - does the name really have a "1" at the end?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-07-30 11:37:25+00:00): 你好北京的睡袋，
在这个变更集中，您在 http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=478984382 的名称末尾添加了一个“1”。 这似乎是一个奇怪的变化——名字的末尾真的有一个“1”吗？
最好的祝福，
安迪
vlas pogreb (2021-07-29 04:48:30+00:00): зміщення растру визначене по GPS трекам*
karson_ (2021-07-29 13:03:20+00:00): Please do not add low quality building traces. These buildings are not rectangles, so they should not be drawn as rectangles. You should trace out every contour of the roof. If your primary goal is adding in the street addresses and you don't want to take the time to draw the buildings, you can simply map them as nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108790441
Pontius (2021-07-29 14:16:08+00:00): They plan to extend Hershey eventually, but I know what you mean.
Dimacn (2021-07-29 16:58:48+00:00): Пожалуйста придерживайтесь соглашения о названиях улиц - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
Правильно так: Сиреневая улица
keithonearth (2021-08-18 06:41:01+00:00): This changeset marks "nature trail" closed to walkers as well as cyclists, but the edit summary only mentions cyclists. Is it really closed? 

The link to the pdf doesn't work, maybe that's the cause of my confusion.
Fleezing (2021-08-18 15:35:26+00:00): It looks like they've already changed the link to the map; you can download the trail map from this page:
https://www.burnaby.ca/explore-outdoors/walking-hiking-and-biking/burnaby-mountain-conservation-area-trails

The "Nature Trail" (in the south end of the bounding box) is marked "access=no, foot=designated" which according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access means that walkers are allowed. The "closed for restoration trail" is, indeed, closed to all.
keithonearth (2021-09-02 16:17:47+00:00): You could be right `access=no` with `foot=designated` could mean that it is only open to walkers, but it is an unusual way of doing it. Tagging it how you did basicly means "no one is allowed here, except walkers". But footpaths are closed to motor vehicles by default, and in this context we are only really worried about foot and bicycle. Tagging it as `access=no` could lead to confusion, as it did with me, and as has happened with the default rendering. In the default rendering it just shows the trail as closed (that's why it's that light grey colour), and it ignores the foot=designated. It is unwise to tag for the renderer, but I'm just using this as an example of the confusion that can arise from an automated system from the way it's been tagged, as well as the way I misunderstood it.

I've removed the unnecessary access tags, and left the `bicycle=no` tag. This is much easier for humans and automated systems to parse.
G_P_J (2021-07-30 10:22:47+00:00): Zmiany wycofane.
G_P_J (2021-07-30 10:19:41+00:00): Zmiany wycofane.
legofahrrad (2022-02-17 20:22:56+00:00): Moin!
Hier hast du schon vor längerer Zeit etwas geändert. Es sieht danach aus, als hättest du Zugang auf das Gelände der Bremer Stahlwerke.
Wenn dies so ist, wäre es super nett, wenn du dir mal die Hinweise auf dem Gelände anschauen könntest, da diese eine Überprüfung vor Ort benötigen.

Zum Beispiel diese Hinweise:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/62546
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/281315

Viele Grüße!
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:16:31+00:00): Added buildings
redd (2025-07-24 09:23:46+00:00): Hi Ze0zohk1,
du hattest hier auch das Denkmal verschoben. Weisst du, ob sich das wirklich auf dem Bahnsteig befindet? Oder handelt es sich um die Steintafeln im Treppenaufgang?

Grüsse,
redd
Ze0zohk1 (2025-07-24 09:27:21+00:00): Hallo redd, das weiß ich nicht mehr. Ich kann auch nicht ausschließen, dass das ein Versehen war.
Viele Grüße
Peter
redd (2025-07-24 09:34:05+00:00): ok, vielen Dank für die sehr schnelle Rückmeldung!

 Ich gehe davon aus, dass es sich um die Steintafeln im Treppenaufgang handelt. Daher wäre die aktuelle Position falsch.

Ich habe auch die anderen Mapper angeschrieben, welche das Denkmal bearbeitet haben.
BCNorwich (2021-07-29 08:10:40+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please, when something needs correcting/amending do this to the existing features rather than just delete as all past history is lost with deletion.

I've reinstated the deleted building and amended the data to reflect your changes. Please check that the data is correct.

Regards Bernard.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:16:07+00:00): Added buildings
edvac (2021-08-03 14:41:42+00:00): Hola, jtorresriv:

¿Podrías indicar la fuente de todos estos datos?

Gracias,

Rafael Avila Coya
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
dmlu (2021-08-05 22:50:25+00:00): Hola, estas ediciones se registran en el ticket #2021070310000111. Jtorresriv proporcionó la exención necesaria, pero no creo que se haya subido a la wiki pública de OSM :)

(Tenga en cuenta que este texto se ha traducido automáticamente)

David Morais Ferreira (With my DWG hat on)
Ray Mandes (2021-07-29 07:13:45+00:00): This changeset simply splits the ways at the three-railway junction. Upon further reading of wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned), no deletion of nodes will be taking place.
Ray Mandes (2021-07-29 07:18:59+00:00): Read (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway) and determine for yourself if some segments deserve deletion.
riysingh (2021-07-29 08:45:10+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 108799951 based on Private Maxar imagery.

Regards,
riysingh.
சேலம் (2021-08-19 19:23:48+00:00): The danger when running the autovalidator is, that it also "fixes" things which have always been wrong like vandalism or which are no more like this Kmart: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256714166/history
Warin61 (2021-07-29 23:49:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsilo
ChonkerStonker (2021-07-30 04:11:41+00:00): thanks
H4N5-antw (2021-09-03 15:04:28+00:00): Waarde Luna, 
Allereerst mijn dank -als fietser- dat u zich bezig houdt met fietsroutes. 
Na befietsen beide zijden en beide richtingen vraag bij edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968395460 : deze tunnel niet aangetroffen, van beide zijden bekeken; traject onwaarschijnlijk, gezien fietspad en spoorlijn op gelijk niveau liggen : kunt u hier wat verduidelijking brengen?
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:15:57+00:00): Added buildings
naomap (2021-08-18 16:37:23+00:00): Bonjour.

Furdrien a supprimé le passage piéton https://www.osm.org/node/382318060 le 9 juin, date plus récente que la BD Ortho : as-tu vérifié avec Furdrien s'il a constaté une suppression du passage piéton sur le terrain ? 

Merci,
Antoine de Carto'Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
user_12951478 (2021-08-22 10:14:31+00:00): Bonjour naomap,

Je n'ai pas demandé à Fudrien. J'habite à 10 min à pied de ce lieu et j'y passe fréquement. J'ai eu un doute suite à ton message et à cause des travaux en gare de Cernay donc je suis allé vérifier sur place aujourd'hui et je confirme que ce passage piéton existe toujours. J'ai pris une photo en preuve mais je ne sais pas si on peut uploader un fichier sur OSM.
eggie (2021-07-29 08:22:26+00:00): Beset Bart service=emergency_access is hier verkeerd gebruikt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Demergency_access
Het is immers geen highway=service
Je kunt gewoon emergency=yes toevoegen.. ook op het paaltje anders helpt het allemaal nog niets.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-29 08:27:14+00:00): Voor zover ik weet is dat paaltje hier verwijderd.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:15:47+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:15:39+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:15:28+00:00): Added building
marco406 (2022-11-05 11:49:18+00:00): Cześć. Czy te podwójne drogi dla rowerów w rejonie ul. Piłsudskiego i Leśnej są poprawne? Czy masz zamiar dokończyć tą edycję i doprowadzić do poprawnego stanu?
lasagna (2021-09-27 04:27:05+00:00): I disagree with your decision to delete these roads (in this changeset and changeset 108805481) for two reasons.

1. The OpenStreetMap data should be complete and usable for everyone, including people who are allowed to use these private roads and need to navigate in the area. This change takes away an important resource from those people.
2. We want to make a complete, detailed map of the world, which includes many features that are closed to the public. These features are still valuable for navigation, and they can be tagged access=private or access=no so that people don't mistakenly try to use them.

Is there some other reason to delete these roads?
ZeLonewolf (2021-10-17 02:33:07+00:00): Have these roads been restored yet?
lasagna (2021-10-17 02:48:04+00:00): Not yet; I was waiting for an explanation but I think we've waited long enough.You're welcome to restore them if you want to.
ZeLonewolf (2021-10-17 03:00:30+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112597141
ZeLonewolf (2021-10-17 03:03:45+00:00): Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112597165
habi (2021-07-30 12:36:09+00:00): Ciao Teo
You've made a typo and added the trees with `specie`.
I corrected this to `species` with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108891599
Greetings from Switzerland
habi
eggie (2021-07-29 08:47:45+00:00): Dag Hulsbosch. Je weg loopt dwars door twee gebouwen.
Wanneer een weg door een gebouw loopt geef je dat aan met tunnel=building_passage
De weg dan splitsen en de nodes van het gedeelte door het gebouw vastmaken aan de gebouwomtrek.

Het gebouwtje op de parkeerplaats kan volgens mij weg.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-29 09:15:50+00:00): Even als voorbeeld aangepast naar building_passage en gebouwtje verwijderd.
mvg
eggie
Hulsbosch (2021-09-17 06:55:24+00:00): Sorry ik zie dit nu pas. Thanks voor de verduidelijking!
iWowik (2022-03-26 09:28:05+00:00): Вот прямо так в ЕГРН Октябрьский без мягкого знака?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8959314354
trolleway (2022-03-26 14:18:54+00:00): Не, обычный, ьь
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:15:15+00:00): Added buildings
eggie (2021-07-29 08:30:11+00:00): Mooi..  motor_vehicle=no heb ik verwijderd hier van het G12a fietspad.
Auto's en motoren routeren in OSM niet over voet- en fietspaden. 
Denk dat het paaltke wel weg kan. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-07-29 08:33:32+00:00): Wanneer het paaltje er wel staat dan ook op het paaltje emergency=yes toevoegen... mits het paaltke inklapbaar of verwijderbaar is.
Volgens mij staat hier overigens geen paaltje. 
emergency=yes routeert hierdoor nog steeds niet.
eggie
Bart van Veldhuisen VGGM Brandweer Amsterdam (2021-07-29 08:35:19+00:00): Hoi Eggie Paaltje staat er niet meer mag helemaal weg daar
eggie (2021-07-29 08:39:40+00:00): Ik haal het wel weg als je dat zelf nog niet hebt gedaan.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2021-07-29 08:40:24+00:00): paaltje is verwijderd
raknm (2021-08-13 01:51:38+00:00): I have modified geometry based on internal delivery partners feedback.
ZLima12 (2021-10-26 04:31:59+00:00): Hi,

You've somehow, perhaps unintentionally, created two overlapping motorways that do not exist. They seem to go back and forth between two parallel bridges that carries I-86. Please try to be careful with this sort of thing.
marczoutendijk (2021-07-29 13:17:30+00:00): Thanks!
G_P_J (2021-07-30 09:58:52+00:00): Znacznik "name" (nazwa) nie służy do wprowadzania opisów obiektów. W tym miejscu wprowadzamy nazwy własne. np. prawidłowo opisanym obiektem jest Urząd Gminy Kuźnica. Ale opisy parku, czy pomnika mogą znaleźć się np. w znaczniku "description" (Opis obiektu). Dodatkowo pomnik nie jest miejscem modlitwy tylko pomnikiem, a ten konkretny pomnik powstał w hołdzie ofiarom II wojny światowej, więc zupełnie nie pasuje tu opis "Pomnik żołnierzy". Zmiany wycofuję. Zapraszam do dyskusji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=836440#p836440
G_P_J (2021-07-30 10:06:09+00:00): Zmiany wycofane w: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108880859
literan (2021-07-29 17:19:29+00:00): там свободный вход в этот туалет и аптеку?
Echo78 (2021-07-31 11:56:24+00:00): На территорию больницы вход несвободный, так что на аптеку можно тое повесить тег.
Echo78 (2021-07-31 11:56:40+00:00): И на кофе
literan (2021-07-31 12:13:13+00:00): тогда, наверное, и на все дороги на территории?
Echo78 (2021-08-01 09:12:41+00:00): В общем- да. Забор там по периметру территории, мимо КПП не пройти. Просто так не пускают.
Echo78 (2021-08-01 09:13:20+00:00): И на авто - тем более.
literan (2021-08-01 12:45:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89990219

а вот товарищ другое пишет, что пускают... или у него устаревшие данные?
solenoid jam (2021-08-01 12:57:21+00:00): В туалет и кафе охранник с улицы не пустит, а аптека может быть специализированная, и туда могут пускать пришедших за лекарствами.
Echo78 (2021-09-07 11:02:45+00:00): Для того. чтобы попасть в туалет или аптеку (по уровню доступа - одно и то же) надо сначала пройти через КПП (проходная на территорию больницы, огороженная забором), а потом войти в корпус приёмного отделения. Там тоже охранник сидит.
Echo78 (2021-09-07 11:29:02+00:00): Если в приёмное отделение пустили (пришли ложиться в стационар или сопровождающее лицо), то в аптеку/туалет доступ есть. Если просто с улицы сунуться, как вы объясните, зачем пришли?
solenoid jam (2021-09-17 06:00:17+00:00): Нет, в аптеку охранник может пустить с улицы, потому что специализированная аптека для онко больных может использоваться больными не лежащими в стационаре, а покупающими лекарства для домашнего лечения по назначению врачей (в том числе врачей из других клиник). 
Туалет это другое дело, в него не пустят. Это разные контексты.
eggie (2021-07-29 09:12:52+00:00): Dag Hulsbosch..
Alle begin is moeilijk
source=BAG is nodig voor periodieke updates vanuit het Kadster. Ik heb die tag hersteld.
Verder gewoon de adresnode gebruiken op scholen op bij te taggen. Ik heb je info overgezet naar de adresnode. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-29 11:43:31+00:00): Bestaat bs de Molenhoek hier niet meer?
Futur3r (2021-07-29 14:30:01+00:00): Salut,

permissive veut dire que l'accès est tolérer sauf que pour utiliser ces parkings il faut un abonnement préalablement souscris en agence.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108808336
eggie (2021-07-29 09:07:50+00:00): Dag Bart.

motor_vehicle=yes hoef je niet te taggen op reguliere wegen. Dat routeert gewoon. Wat is het probleem hier?
gr eggie
eggie (2021-07-29 09:17:44+00:00): Wel is het van belang om de goede tracktype=grade?   toe te voegen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype
gr eggie
eggie (2021-07-29 09:20:50+00:00): Zo te zien gravel ... dan tracktype=grade2

Is het onverhard dan grade3
eggie (2021-07-29 11:21:19+00:00): motor_vehicle=yes verwijderd. Dat is niet correct. tracktype=grade2 (half verhard ) toegevoegd. het hoort gewoon zo te routeren. 
MVG
eggie
Bart van Veldhuisen VGGM Brandweer Amsterdam (2021-07-29 11:30:32+00:00): top dank je wel!
Dodko (2021-07-29 11:17:46+00:00): Touto značkou
natural=wood sa značí les https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:natural%3Dwood

Pre strom použite 
natural=tree
leaf_type=broadleaved
denotation=urban
a potom podrobnosti o rode

Príklad je https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:natural%3Dtree
Ser9ei (2021-08-27 13:36:13+00:00): Каков источник наименования бухты? На бухту это тоже вряд ли похоже.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 15:17:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8959503636/history has nature = tree that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be natural=tree? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree (though maybe it is not a tree anymore?)
trial (2022-09-06 17:25:59+00:00): Bonjour, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=48.800841593186&lng=2.1290454963928&pKey=959361231560741&focus=photo&x=0.4457786634409326&y=0.2765362595855924&zoom=1 : je vois une seule plaque d'égoût. Tu en as deux : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3825613599 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3825613597 (et un peu avant la borne incendie). C'est volontaire ?
SekeRob (2021-07-29 09:58:00+00:00): Apologies for the large CS, the indicator started turning red while on a role and at the end got 2 pieces of grassland, one refusing to render, a multipolygon, polygon does, both whole or part 'inner to woodland.
SekeRob (2021-07-29 10:16:02+00:00): Continues to be no show https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13030825 Tested a second 'inner' grassland by planting a tree, the difference, but it remains showing properly.
SekeRob (2021-07-29 10:17:48+00:00): Hoping Osmose throws out an error, maybe just a node that has a faulty tag.
SekeRob (2021-07-29 10:20:22+00:00): found it, a self intersection will do that. fatto.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-29 10:01:12+00:00): JOSM zeigt mir immer Warnungen, weil building:part und building zusammen auf einer Fläche verwendet werden...
highflyer74 (2021-07-29 10:32:37+00:00): Hi! Das ist ein bisschen Overkill, wie das hier gemappt ist. Da ist auch noch eine Relation vom Typ building... Alles nicht notwendig. Mappe am besten immer alles so einfach wie möglich, damit auch nachfolgende Mapper die Dinge noch bearbeiten können. In diesem Fall: ein Polygon für die Garage und eines für das Carport. Jeweils nur mit building=garage und building=carport getaggt. Fertig!

building:part=* wird beim detaillierten Mappen von Gebäuden, vor allem im 3D-Bereich genutzt.

Wenn Du noch Fragen hast, oder Hilfe brauchst, melde Dich gern!
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-29 10:40:19+00:00): Und was mache ich mit der Adresse? M. W. soll die innerhalb von OSM eindeutig sein. Sonst hätte ich das genau so gemacht, wie du es beschrieben hast.