piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
McPomHH (2022-08-16 16:42:17+00:00): Danke für deine Rückmeldung. Lass mich dazu wie folgt Stellung nehmen:

1. Entweder kommt die Änderung zu früh oder sie kommt zu spät. Es ist nahezu unmöglich, die Änderung genau zu dem Zeitpunkt einzutragen, an dem die Linie tatsächlich in Betrieb geht. Welchen Tod willst du eigentlich sterben? Vor allem: Wir haben teils monatelange Umleitungen, die hier nicht abgebildet werden - wir haben also wohl nicht den Anspruch, die Realität 100%ig abzubilden. Ich denke, ein paar Tage zu früh zu sein ist nicht schlechter als ein paar Tage zu spät. Oder gibt es einen offiziellen Standard dazu, der mir gerade nicht bewusst ist?

2. Gleiches gilt für die Haltestellen: Ja, sie sind nicht 100%ig an der Stelle eingezeichnet, wo sie vermutlich zu finden sind. Aber auf Basis der vorliegenden Informationen sollten sie zumindest in Sichtweite sein. Zudem sind sie als unfertig markiert. Auf diese Art und Weise sind die Linien und Haltestellen kein Selbstzweck sondern bietet dem Nutzer einen gut verständlichen Wert.

Also, welchen Anspruch hast du, haben wir, an das Mapping der ÖPNV Linien in Hamburg? 100% korrekt oder gar nicht? Oder eher so gut, wie möglich, so dass sie bereits einen sinnvollen Nutzen bringen?
user_15552334 (2022-08-11 20:29:20+00:00): epic edit 420!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124789418
Hopla57 (2022-08-11 19:26:58+00:00): Clôture note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3244761
lakedistrict (2022-12-28 14:32:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits around Troutbeck earlier this year. What's your source for this road name? Only the northernmost part of the village road (at Town Head) is known as Townhead Brow.
lakedistrict (2023-01-29 17:26:45+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131848616
user_5359 (2022-08-12 08:11:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/98880730. What is the meaning of the booth tags
33 = T
369940 = 5205638
?
JeroenHoek (2022-08-12 06:54:39+00:00): Dat lijkt me goed. Alleen moet motor_car dan motor_vehicle zijn.
JeroenHoek (2022-08-12 06:57:30+00:00): Of motorcar=destination (let op: geen underscore) als het een bord is met alleen een autosymbool erop en geen motor.
framistat (2022-08-24 12:26:17+00:00): I visited the homeowner at 6 Southcross and she showed me the creek in her back yard.  It is indeed a creek there, not a ditch, but again, it is a continuation of Cross Canal Brook.
mariotomo (2022-08-15 11:20:01+00:00): hola bienvenido a OSM. si quieres utilizar OSM como base para análisis de datos (sin relevancia para el proyecto OSM), sugiero umap. lo encuentras mencionado en el wiki o con una búsqueda del web. ojalá tengas interés en apoyar el proyecto con observaciones de objetos reales: OSM tiene pocos maperos en Panamá.
mariotomo (2022-08-19 15:07:59+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125112482
literan (2022-08-12 16:52:45+00:00): такое гигантское здание, 200 метров длиной? вы уверены?
EugeniyKH (2022-08-13 07:40:26+00:00): Нет, не уверен. Это огороженная забором вертолетная площадка. Пара мелких зданий там стоит, но их пока не видно на снимках, рано рисовать.
ПС. Если знаете правильный тег для вертолетной площадки, поменяйте, пожалуйста.
mariotomo (2022-08-11 20:20:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124791271
mariotomo (2022-08-11 20:12:59+00:00): y lo alcanzas a ver en el mapa Maxar? ubicación y nombre? una placa en el suelo que puedes ver en la foto?
mariotomo (2022-08-11 20:20:30+00:00): la ubicación encaja muy bien con OpenTopoMap … pero, y el nombre?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124790622
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 04:28:50+00:00): Saludos mariotmo, para el relieve uso la capa de cyclosm, la ubicación quizas no es lo mas precisa, en esto casos es una aproximidad al punto mas elevado.
mariotomo (2023-01-23 13:32:51+00:00): pero, y el nombre?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-12 16:42:06+00:00): porque removeu as vias de pedestre?
user_2066394 (2022-08-12 00:07:13+00:00): building=* kann das Gebäude schon vertragen.
Spoony (2022-08-12 10:27:29+00:00): Na gut, woll'n wir mal nicht so sein... ;)
Danke für den Hinweis!
user_2066394 (2022-08-13 09:30:06+00:00): :-) einwandfrei
Austrianton (2022-08-12 17:14:26+00:00): If possible please keep edits local. That way you don't spam the history feed-globally.
alex_lofi (2022-08-11 22:00:48+00:00): Hola, ¿puede que sea TuSuper? Muchos Covirán han cambiado últimamente.
Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124792030
Dani CS (2022-08-12 07:36:26+00:00): Hola alex_lofi, creo que tienes razón, he hecho el cambio de memoria y lo he escrito mal. Corrijo inmediatamente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124792030
MxxCon (2022-08-12 06:03:15+00:00): Hello.
This edit is invalid. Subway is located next door to Sticky's. Therefore, it is inappropriate to just rename unrelated business, especially without changing any other details such as website, phone number, type, etc etc.
As such, this edit is going to be reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124792810
delusional (2022-08-11 21:13:21+00:00): I realize the upper right corner looks weird. It's due to the formulation in the law. Supposedly it follows the coastline at a distance of 200 meters, but then the coordinate specified is located 250 meters from the coast. I just let it do an unnatural jump, but I'm open to suggestions.
delusional (2022-08-11 21:30:34+00:00): Technically, the law says the area extends into the land to the "waterlevel at high tide". That seems rather pedantic though.
ivanbranco (2022-10-01 10:20:22+00:00): Ciao Ysogo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9948206518

questo wikidata non esiste, sai qual è quello giusto?
Hufkratzer (2022-08-12 21:18:10+00:00): Hi, why did you change the tagging from leisure=pitch to leisure=horse_riding? It looks like a riding arena in the aerial view and the wiki recommends leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian for riding arenas, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena. Tag leisure=horse_riding (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding) is for the whole area of a riding centre, example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365673006
user_6110846 (2022-08-13 08:20:13+00:00): будь ласка створюй коментарі які чітко розповідають що саме ти рбив цією правкою
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-12 16:42:36+00:00): porque removeu o desenho das casas?
Ariel Rocha de Souza (2022-08-13 10:45:22+00:00): Porque pretendo refazê-los em maior detalhe, e já tinha muitas modificações nesse edit (mais de 300).
Inclusive vô começar agr
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-08-24 21:50:52+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم تغيير تصنيف القرية وعدد السكان لا يتعدى 5000 نسمة ولا يوجد إحصاء رسمي يدعم كلامك وفي حال رغبتك بالتعديل نرجوا منكم وضع مصادر لذلك.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-12 19:46:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124830458 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism by Jimbo the Geographer
Mashin (2022-08-13 15:49:23+00:00): Hi David,
this is unfortunately not the first time, but I hope it will be the last time I have to say it. Please don't remove forests and other land covers. If you see any inaccuracies, you can easily move their nodes to fix the shape according to the recent aerial imagery.
Jmapper007 (2022-08-14 02:41:44+00:00): Well that's a good 30 minutes of my life wasted... Thankfully i have JOSM now but cmon man...
David Reik (2022-08-14 14:35:27+00:00): Actually, I'm interested putting in forest cover on OSM.  The trouble is putting in forest cover is a lot more complicated than people would like to assume.  There was an unfortunate tradition that seems to have started with a bunch of imports of very appoximate preserve boundaries in which it was assumed that the legal boundaries of the preserves were the same as the boundaries of wooded areas, which is rarely the case.  Just focusing on George F. Cloutier Memorial Forest can illuminate some of the complications.  First, although the area is called "Forest," the area contains several non-forested areas.  There are two bodies of water, and a large area (visible on the Bing aerial imagery) where, in 2019, there was an extensive timber harvest to salvage dead trees. Most trees were, cut but many were left, leaving an area that is more meadow than forest.  Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection is interested in forest cover.  Maybe they have a data set that could be imported.  Maybe there is some way of putting in forest cover in the form of dots instead of area boundaries.
snoozingnewt (2022-08-14 19:51:47+00:00): That doesn't justify deleting it, unless the time spent fixing it would be longer than the time spent remaking it. It's more accurate than no forest cover at all and can be easily fixed
snoozingnewt (2022-08-14 19:53:48+00:00): If something is tagged as forest and it isn't forest, there are two fixes, both of which are not deleting the forest. One is to modify the forest boundary. If the forest encompasses the entire area, then create a multipolygon relation by selecting both and pressing the c button on iD, which I just did to the aforementioned meadow + ponds.
Mashin (2022-08-14 21:34:47+00:00): @David: What we are collectively trying to explain to you is that OSM takes an iterative approach. When the data are first time entered into OSM they might be somewhat inaccurate, but subsequent edits make them more refined and true to the reality. Purely deleting the data, as you are doing, does not improve anything.

In JOSM you can fast create the multipolygon relation with Ctrl+B or update an existing multipolygon with Shift+Ctrl+B. (Though I think you have to install utilsplugin2 first)
Jmapper007 (2022-08-16 21:57:34+00:00): Responding to David's comment, when I first created the forest area the newest bing imagery was not yet out, so I did it according to the ersi imagery which was the newest at that time.
eggie (2022-08-12 06:16:29+00:00): Restored addressnode. Please don't delete BAG addressnodes..
gr eggie
eggie (2022-08-12 05:50:14+00:00): Please don't delete addressnodes
I restored the addressnode
gr eggie
eggie (2022-08-12 05:47:34+00:00): Hi Asclepis..

Why duplicated tagging graveyard and cemetery?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcemetery

In most (European) countries, there is a difference between amenity=grave_yard and landuse=cemetery. Cemeteries are usually independent of places of worship (e.g. military cemeteries), while grave yards are usually the yard of a place of worship. 

Don't tag both
Gr eggie
Taya_S (2023-05-14 16:58:38+00:00): Hi, zou je in de toekomst niet geldige landuse=forest gebieden willen verwijderen?

Ook heb je sommige verwijderde landuses vervangen door honderden willekeurig geplaatste natural=tree's, een goed aantal daarvan zaten ook nog eens vast aan andere objecten. Heb er meer dan 100 verwijderd, en op ameland ook al een rond de 500.
rarad74 (2022-08-13 12:27:22+00:00): Hello. The lanes are too near one each other. Calea Domneasca must not be divided.
luin132 (2022-08-15 19:53:20+00:00): Hi razor74,
I agree, this road shouldn’t be divided along the entire length since there isn’t physical separation. In this changeset, I adjusted crossings. A different editor created the divided highway. Thank you.
eggie (2022-08-12 05:42:33+00:00): You deleted the BAG addressnode .. Please don't. I restored the addressnode
gr eggie
eggie (2022-08-12 05:59:43+00:00): Hi ..
No grave_yard  for sure.. but.. 
tomb=?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dtomb

Greetz,
eggie
p210 (2022-08-31 00:24:49+00:00): Błąd mapowania - ten paczkomat jest w innym miejscu - przy Centrum Dekada.
p210 (2022-08-31 00:27:28+00:00): W uzupełnieniu - Paczkomat OLS05A.
starsep (2022-08-31 08:12:10+00:00): Ta zmiana tylko zmieniła tagowanie. Jeżeli wiesz, gdzie dokładnie się znajduje ten paczkomat to proszę popraw lokalizację :)
Bierphysik (2025-01-27 07:31:26+00:00): Hi. Du hast den Wge mit access=no getaggt; aber da liegen aktuell noch zwei Wanderrelationen drauf. Da kann also etwa snicht stimmen - entweder Dein access Tag oder die Relationen.
BasicMaster18 (2025-01-27 18:06:06+00:00): Hallo, bei mir werden keine Relationen für diesen Weg angezeigt; wo siehst du diese? Zumindest damals war der Weg schon länger gesperrt. Eventuell ist das mittlerweile anders; kann ich ggf. demnächst prüfen.
Bierphysik (2025-01-27 18:49:32+00:00): Die relation hat jemand vorhin entfernt ^^
eggie (2022-08-12 05:33:59+00:00): Ho asclepius  For what sake moving a graveyard to areas?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124796063
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-08-12 05:38:34+00:00): You deleted the BAG addressnode.. Needed to find the church.
I restored the addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
baspng (2022-08-19 20:13:36+00:00): É conveniente que não seja feita a sobreposição de linhas, uma vez que ela é prejudicial quando houver necessidade de se fazer ajustes ou complementações no mapa.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
ivanbranco (2022-08-13 08:18:05+00:00): Hi albertoq,

what's the source of this edit? Seems like an import, or you visited 124 car repair shops asking for payment methods? Seems more like an import. You have been asked for the source of your edits twice already, in changeset/123243916 and changeset/101355648.

Also you have 37 changeset with comments from at least 12 different users, you didn't replied once.

Also please use a meaningful changeset comment, "Datos Completos" doens't other users understand what you have done. You have been asked to do so twice already, in changeset/123094716 and changeset/81753515.

Also there's no need to add source=albertoq2004@hotmail.com to ever element you added, your edits are already connected to your username via the element history. If the source of the data you add comes from your surveys you can add source=survey in the changeset source.
Allison P (2022-11-23 06:43:13+00:00): I guess they are changing the collector names after all. Addresses have been changed.
luiswoo (2022-08-12 03:52:02+00:00): с одной стороны, снимки яндекса использовать нельзя (https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright), а с другой -- как-то не заметно, особого смещения снимков яндекса относительного того же максара и любых других, что доступны легально. Можно было бы упомянуть, что привязывать нужно по трекам, а не левым снимкам https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2.
Yury Scherbakov (2022-08-12 11:04:24+00:00): Идея была в том, чтобы получить более четкое и вертикальное изображение местности и тем самым увидеть расположение дорог и пешеходных дорожек, перекрытых искаженными зданиями в картах от Bing и Esri. Собственно снимок от Яндекс я притягивал к этим двум провайдерам и только после вносил изменения, постоянно переключаясь между слоями bind/esri/yandex, поэтому расположение должно быть близко к действительности. Побудило меня к этому то, что в текущем исполнении дороги и объекты с трудом умещали  между собой, что немного соответствует действительности 

По GPS координатам планирую сверяться уже после расположения всех объектов на карте. Трекер на руках имеется
luiswoo (2022-08-12 17:47:57+00:00): Ладно, совсем просто: одного упоминания яндекса достаточно для отката правки и бана. Исключение -- яндекс панорамы, и только потому, что их делает другая компания, которая явно дала разрешение на использование своих панорам в OSM.
Yury Scherbakov (2022-08-12 18:52:10+00:00): Понял. Разобрался в вопросе, каюсь 🙁 хотел как лучше. Но под копирку ничего не перерисовывал. Отталкиваюсь от знания местности
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-08-24 21:47:16+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
rjgambrel (2022-08-13 23:05:09+00:00): In this changeset you reverted a change I made recently. My change was made to conform with the agreed guidelines for Minn highway classification and your change (with minimal changeset information) goes counter to that guidance. This "motorway island" was discussed in the community discussion about how to handle islands including this specific one. Can you look at that guidance specifically at "island" US14a (listed in table S3) and explain why you think that agreed guidance is wrong? Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Minnesota/Minnesota_highway_classification section 5.2.2. I remember inviting you to the public discussion. I am not sure whether you participated or not. Please respond here or message me if you want or join the Slack discussion to comment at: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCV2P9QET
BCNorwich (2022-08-12 07:22:32+00:00): Hi, Way: 924389691 is a service road serving some garages.
Nawfal85 (2022-09-30 07:42:41+00:00): المكان خاطيء لا يوجد هنا سوبر ماركت هذه منطقة سياج الملعب يرجى تعديل موقع المكان اذا كنت تعتقد ان اسم المتجر صحيح والمتجر موجود بالفعل قد يكون في ركن حي التعاون كما يشير الاسم لذلك انقله الى المكان الصحيح وفي حالة عدم الاجابة خلال اسبوع سيتم حذف المكان
Frans S (2022-08-28 09:03:29+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However mostly not squared.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124799043
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:57:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:53:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-21 23:58:02+00:00): ainda existe esta bridgestone? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3198696998/history
BCNorwich (2022-08-13 07:15:00+00:00): Hi, Just to let you know you inadvertently duplicated Hartington Street by adding Way: Hartington Street (1085735761) atop of the existing road.

I've removed the duplicate.

Regards Bernard.
achsaw (2022-08-16 04:36:13+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies, for the wrong modification of road. Going ahead, I'll ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Thanks again, Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
achsaw
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-09 18:15:56+00:00): Duplicate
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124799481
Владимир К (2022-09-24 08:26:23+00:00): Добрый день! 
почему вы не соединяете тротуары с дорогами на переходах?
Glassman (2022-08-12 15:37:54+00:00): Please add the business as a node at their exact location. I've restored the service road to it's original tags.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124800138
RicoElectrico (2022-08-12 16:19:17+00:00): Cześć, w temacie ratownictwa - jeśli znasz jakieś defibrylatory AED w Twojej okolicy, to będę wdzięczny za dodanie ich przez naszą mapkę: https://aed.openstreetmap.org.pl/

Pozdrawiam!
nevw (2022-08-12 06:39:38+00:00): Hi
was it intentional to delete a section of McKean Street?
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=124800321
nevw (2022-08-12 08:28:30+00:00): Have you used Google imagery here instead of Bing?
nevw (2022-08-12 11:31:05+00:00): Hi
I have decided to revert this changeset after referring to available OSM imagery and hospital development websites.
wayfree (2022-08-13 03:22:20+00:00): Google imagery was used as it showed the construction works are complete.
I intended to remove the service road to the hospital now replaced with a car park and driveway to the Caboolture Medical Hub only and the associated traffic lights.
The Hospital web site https://metronorth.health.qld.gov.au/caboolture/maps-and-directions indicates the works are still in progress and it was Last updated 3 August 2022. 
Clearly, it's wrong and I've provided feedback to the hospital to review their information. It's a government institution so they've probably missed updating the image!
nevw (2022-08-13 05:48:47+00:00): Hi
the Google satellite imagery you have used is dated 27Oct2017
The date at the bottom of Google just shows the current copyright year
You need to use Google Earth instead to see the year of the imagery.
You can use the Google street view along Mewett St (Aug 2018) up to the roundabout to see the old carpark too, but as soon as you get on to McKean St the Street View image changes to Dec 2021 and this shows the current construction work, including the emergency entrance where the lights are, and across the road, the Caboolture Medical Hub and further down the street you can see the construction area extends through where the heliport used to be.

However, the Google copyright prevents us from using their satellite or street view imagery to assist in mapping the OSM.

The Esri, Bing and Maxar imagery available in OSM editors are able to be used to map the OSM and are more recent than Google aerial imagery and show the current construction.

The Caboolture Hospital Redevelopment commenced in November 2019 and is due to be completed in 2024.
This is the web page for the development…  https://metronorth.health.qld.gov.au/caboolture/caboolture-hospital-redevelopment/project-overview
The site activity updates are here  https://metronorth.health.qld.gov.au/caboolture/caboolture-hospital-redevelopment/site-activity-updates and some have images showing the new multi-level carpark and the new clinical centre.

I feel I have correctly mapped the current situation with the the latest info and will be able to visit the area soon to make amendments.

regards, Nev
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:20:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert