piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skifans (2022-11-21 22:36:48+00:00): Hi,

I'm sure that they used to be tracks historically. And maybe I'm wrong but I didn't feel they where wide enough to qualify. You physically couldn't drive a 4x4 down it due to the overgrowth on the sides which I suppose is the metric I've normally gone for. But that's more from what I'd call them day to day rather then anything I've head on OSM.

I sadly didn't take any photos but there is a old one at https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/5723832 - and day to day I'd call that a path without any knowledge based on that photo, not a track (though well aware the person who posted it disagree), these days sides are more overgrown rather then grass.

If they where not Bridleways I'd have changed them to Footpath, went for Bridleways due to the legal status (which is signed on the ground). This is what I tagged for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158237527/

Looking on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack) it says "Track roads are used by four-wheeled (two-track) vehicles and often take the form of two wheel tracks in the ground (also known as a two-track road)" which I'd say is a fair description and I don't think these meet that - not having 2 tracks and not being useable by 4 wheeled vehicles.

Yeah I did have a good walk thanks - and always welcome input/corrections - do you know the area?
gurglypipe (2022-11-22 10:35:46+00:00): > You physically couldn't drive a 4x4 down it due to the overgrowth on the sides which I suppose is the metric I've normally gone for.

That makes sense to me! Thanks for taking the time to explain it all.

I know the top end of Heald Lane, which I think qualifies as a track, and that’s why I was wondering about this edit — but I haven’t actually been down Heald Lane (or the others) before and you have!

Cheers :)
skifans (2022-11-24 20:40:16+00:00): Ah perfect, no worries and always worth checking. Yeah its just the but right into the farm, I'll add that in more grandually.
skifans (2022-11-24 20:40:33+00:00): *granularity
martianfreeloader (2023-03-18 23:43:24+00:00): Hi,

Can you
a) provide a source for the proposed highway and
b) add the proposed=* tag?

You may know that mapping non-existing things is rather frowned upon by the community. I don't really mind in this particular case, but I'd agree with the wiki insofar as a source should be provided to offer at least a bare minimum of verifiability.

Same for this one:  https://www.osm.org/way/1115594603
StefanB (2023-03-19 12:55:38+00:00): Added proposed=tertiary (same as Bratislavska cesta and Pot na Fužine) and source
https://www.ljubljana.si/assets/Uploads/Elaborat-lokacijske-preveritve2.pdf
martianfreeloader (2023-03-19 20:29:15+00:00): Cool :-)
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-20 10:03:32+00:00): Hallo Schremserfrank,

nur ein Test? Falls ja, bitte wieder entfernen. Danke.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-20 10:03:41+00:00): Hallo Schremserfrank,

nur ein Test? Falls ja, bitte wieder entfernen. Danke.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_17724595 (2022-11-19 23:41:53+00:00): The changelog should've been: 
'Replace non-existent jeweler with grocery.'

Every Door is great so far, but why doesn't it prompt for the changelog comment? And why do I have to use the advanced tag editor for such a basic thing as changing the value of the shop tag? And then I have to remember and type the value instead of simply choosing it from a list. And then it doesn't render the icon for half of the most common shop types.

Maybe I just haven't figured out how to use it yet...
MxxCon (2022-11-22 21:30:04+00:00): you can change POI type by simply tapping on it in the blue title bar
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129140696
user_17724595 (2022-11-24 23:28:03+00:00): OK, thanks! :)
StefanB (2022-12-19 15:09:12+00:00): Iz višjega dela kristalne palače
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305523064
sem odstranil building=commercial
ker je to le building:part (glej https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part ), 
ki je vsebovan v celotni zgradbi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143867459
ki že ima building=commercial
emersonveenstra (2022-11-23 17:16:49+00:00): Hi,

You crossed a waterway and highway without adding a bridge or tunnel here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1104192782#map=20/42.95367/-85.11870

The editor warns you about this before you save the changeset, please pay attention to those warnings and fix them! thanks
mavl (2022-11-21 14:47:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок испортил улицу 30 лет Победы. Этот пакет правок отменён.
Diacritic (2022-11-21 01:33:30+00:00): Hi Hither and Tither.

The boxy intersection that you've adjusted at that location is actually best ptractice. We use the ways as an abstraction of the actual travel paths of the vehicles in the intersection. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Junctions

It looks a little weird at first, but it makes the map more usuable for routing services. :)

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129141265
ivanbranco (2022-11-20 00:48:50+00:00): Hi,

there's no need to add bicycle=no and horse=no to highway=pedestrian, those values are implied, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Worldwide
highflyer74 (2022-11-29 07:31:53+00:00): Moin!

Hier ist ein ziemliches Chaos entstanden... Warum sind die Taxiways als Relationen angelegt?

Gruss aus HB!
Hufkratzer (2022-11-20 09:49:24+00:00): Hi, du hast einige Flächen mit leisure=horse_riding (Preset "Reitanlage") getaggt, die im Luftbild nicht nach Reitanlagen aussehen:
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115620332 sieht aus wie ein Roundpen, die werden üblicherweise wie Reitplätze getaggt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz (iD-Preset "Reitplatz")
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115620395 unklar, was das ist, aber sicher zu klein für eine Reitanlage (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding)
3. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1110606908 könnte von der Grüße her ein kleiner Reitplatz sein, ist nur ungewöhnlich, dass mitten auf einem Reitplatz dieser Größe ein Baum steht

Was meinst du dazu?
stillhart (2022-11-20 14:34:50+00:00): 1. Macht Sinn.
3. Ich denke auch hier passt Reitanlage besser. Das mit dem Baum stimmt so, schon seit Dekaden :-). Der Hof hat Kühe und Pferde. Die Plätze werde nach meinem Wissen auch vermietet, es werden aber hauptsächlich Kutschenfahrten angeboten. Daher denke ich das die Nutzung leicht abweichend von "Normal" ist. 
2. Der Bauer hat nach meinem Wissen auch Pferde, daher gehe ich von Infrastruktur für diese aus. Ein Reitplatz wäre vermutlich passender, oder doch gleich "Landwirtschaftlicher Betrieb"?

Dann ein 4. von mir. Auch hier handelt es sich um einen Hof mit Pferden. Wiederum vermietete Plätze. Was passt da am besten? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1115620395#map=20/47.35005/9.08410

Und ein 5. Das ist eine Reit-Halle. Was mappt man da? https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1115620395#map=19/47.35471/9.07707

fyi, bin kein Pferde-Experte, nur lokal :-)
stillhart (2022-11-20 14:35:42+00:00): Und verwende beim Anschauen unbedingt die swisstopo SWISSIMAGE.
Hufkratzer (2022-11-20 20:47:37+00:00): Allgemain gibt es im Wiki zu Pferden und Reiten eine (bzw. in deutsch zwei) Übersicht(en):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Reiten
und zu Reitanlgen eine Diskussion im Forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71856

zu 2: 
Den Bauernhof insgesamt kann man wohl als landwirtsch. Betrieb mappen, aber
a) nicht alles, wo ein paar Pferde sind, ist deswegen eine Reitanlage
b) würde das nicht klären, was diese kleine Fläche ist, die du gemappt hast; 
die sieht mir nach einem ganz kleinen Reitplatz aus, und wenn das stimmt, wäre das ein Indiz, dass man den Bauernhof  als Reitanlage/Reiterhof bezeichnen könnte. Aber es könnte auch ein Paddock sein (und das Tagging von Paddocks hat sich noch nicht so richtig etabliert, weswegen sie oft falsch wie Reitplätze getaggt werden).

zu 3:
Ein Tag speziell für Kutschfahrtenanbieter ist mir nicht bekannt. Habe schon öfter gesehen, dass solche Stellen dann auch als Reitanlagen gemappt wurden; meistens werden die Kutschpferde ja auch ab und zu geritten.
Aber trotzdem wäre ja nicht die Fläche, die du gemappt hast, die Reitanlage. Sondern zur Reitanlage würde ja wohl auch der Stall und der Roundpen gehören. Wenn unklar ist, was die Gesamtfläche der Reitanlage ist, kann man stattdessen einen extra Knoten dafür mappen. Die Fläche mit dem Baum in der Mitte scheint mir ein Paddock zu sein, a) wegen dem Baum, b) es stehen im Luftbild auch 2 Pferde drin.

zu 4:
Könnte eine Reianlage (Reiterhof) sein, könnte man dann so ähnlich mappen wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30220880.

zu 5:
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall. Dafür gibt's noch kein Preset.
Allison P (2024-03-07 03:44:51+00:00): Wrong place
Necessarycoot72 (2024-03-07 18:41:04+00:00): According to Wikidata and GNIS it's correct. Can you source that it's not?
Allison P (2024-03-07 20:06:25+00:00): Island Park is already on the map elsewhere. Mack's Inn is an old locality. Sorry for not being more clear. Zoom out and look to the south.
Frans S (2022-12-20 11:34:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. You tag highways wrongly.
Here, you tag them as farmland=unclassified.
You work in JOSM ! Don't you use the fast draw plugin?  Hard to make those errors.
I correct them
Best regards
mavl (2022-11-21 14:43:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет для пожарной части название "Пожарная часть". "Пожарная часть" - это не название, а тип объекта, который уже указан с помощью тега "amenity=fire_station".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F  
  
Тег opening_hours=24/7 не имеет большого смысла для пожарной части (они все работают круглосуточно).
emersonveenstra (2022-11-20 15:52:58+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! Phone numbers have very specific formatting requirements, would you mind looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage and then updating the phone number? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129142572
cyton (2024-07-29 07:35:55+00:00): I mean, you didn't have to delete the building=construction polygon and add a new one in the same place which looks different.

see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Adikso (2022-11-20 05:56:16+00:00): Nazwą powinna być nazwa obowiązująca w rzeczywistości np. nazwa restauracji, oficjalna nazwa parku etc. Dodana przez ciebie nazwa jest za bardzo opisowa. Poza tym z tego, co mi wiadomo, ten park kieszonkowy nie ma nazwy.

Musiałem wycofać zmiany ze względu na uszkodzenie w tych zmianach ulicy, która przecinała się po zmianach przez budynki (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129144921)
Adikso (2022-11-20 06:05:41+00:00): Czy rzeczywiście tak się nazywa to miejsce? Jeżeli np. na drzwiach budynku/witrynie jest napisane "AKS", a nie "AKS - Adrian Buchta" to nazwa z drzwi/witryny obowiązuje.
user_17724595 (2022-11-20 02:24:06+00:00): Review requested because first of all I'm not completely sure about the bike lane, tbh, because it doesn't appear on the official NYC DOT bike map, and also because OSM seems to have 99.99% of NYC bike lanes added within a week of their introduction. So, this situation seems strange... And secondly I did a sloppy job with this, just changing a single tag and not merging the elements. But, I'm a newbie and I'm too lazy to figure out how to do that properly rn. So, maybe I'll fix it later but right now I just wanna experiment and practice editing OSM a little bit. If it does turn out to be wrong it'll be easy to revert this way.
MxxCon (2022-11-22 21:37:54+00:00): Hello.
Please don't "experiment" on the live OSM map. It is used by thousands of data consumers and it is inappropriate to perform test edits there.
If you want to practice, buried in Vespuci's settings you can change it to point to sandbox OSM server rather than the live one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129142685
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 00:04:22+00:00): I am sorry for my comment. It was wrong and inappropriate and I did not mean what I said. 
As for my edit, it was correct. I re-checked it in person and on aerial and street level imagery. And I did the best I could at the time with the code. I later did some more research and discovered that it would be a good idea to add this way to a relation, so I corrected it in a later edit. (#129166534) It's a good thing I didn't do it immediately as I had no idea that relations exist in OSM and what I was thinking at the time was wrong.
MxxCon (2022-11-25 00:27:06+00:00): Yes, relations are rather nuanced feature of OSM. Sometimes it makes sense to use them and sometimes it's just as informative and easier to parse if features are left as is. (not saying that's the case here, but in general)
Adikso (2022-11-20 06:03:16+00:00): Nie mogłem znaleźć potwierdzenia istnienia takiego miejsca, ale jeżeli rzeczywiście istnieje, to należałoby zmienić "Rodzaj obiektu" na hotel/pensjonat/etc. Bez ustawienia rodzaju nie będzie się dało wyszukać takiego hotelu filtrując po hotelach.
adrianojbr (2022-11-20 06:30:46+00:00): Olá, ventomar!

Fiz alguns ajustes nos seus últimos mapeamentos.

Faltou corrigir os valores para algumas etiquetas em português, lembrando que por padrão e por ser um projeto internacional as etiquetas devem ser em inglês.

Abraço!
ventomar (2022-11-21 23:31:41+00:00): Obrigado pela orientação
ventomar (2022-11-21 23:35:21+00:00): Esclareço que eu estou como responsável por esse espaço e, apesar de algumas inconsistências de informações, ainda sou possivelmente quem melhor conhece os limites e conteúdos desse mapa. Havia identificado que os limites da fazenda estavam errados e por isso corrigi. Aproveitei o embalo e demarquei os conteúdos das áreas que são informação de extrema importância para os usuários desse local.
user_1566574 (2023-03-06 15:01:21+00:00): Salut !
Je ne comprends pas tes modifications sur le magasin ATAC (bi1) de Mouthe, qui du coup rendent inutiles les building:part ?

— https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944049429
— https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132006988

Si tu peux m'éclairer stp, merci ! :)
gendy54 (2023-03-06 21:23:03+00:00): J'ai corrigé. Juste un doublon que je n'avais pas vu.
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-22 02:40:57+00:00): Hi, dhia althaf. Your edit looks awesome.
I found some issues about crossing waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1115628260). Is that area regularly flooded when it rains? I want to change to a hazard flood tag but don't have local knowledge of the area there. please let me know if there's any update on this area. Thank you and happy mapping!
Elyana IRM-ED (2022-12-22 03:40:06+00:00): Hai, dhia althaf.

Terima kasih atas kontribusinya untuk OSM. Saya ingin menginformasikan bahwa data area (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1115630216) mengalami crossing dengan beberapa objek yang ada di dalamnya dikarenakan area tersebut terdeteksi sebagai badan air (natural=water). Apakah sebenarnya area yang Anda maksud adalah kawasan rawan banjir? Jika iya, Anda bisa menggunakan tag flood_prone (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flood_prone) sebagai gantinya.
Bila berkenan, kami mohon kesediaan Anda untuk memperbaikinya.
Terima kasih.

Salam,
Elyana
Supaplex (2022-11-20 06:44:35+00:00): Is there a name for the place of worship?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129143705
merylstreet (2022-11-20 10:55:29+00:00): I only saw Chinese characters and can't read them, but this is the one https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g13806886-d550665-Reviews-Henan_Temple-Shoufeng_Hualien.html
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129143705
Supaplex (2022-11-21 06:39:59+00:00): Thanks for the help. I add the English and Mandarin name according to the Tripadvisor and near by bus stop name
hatul (2023-05-10 19:24:08+00:00): תודה על התרומה. אין צורך לתת שם „בור” זה ברור מהתיוג.
gscholz (2022-11-21 06:16:12+00:00): Hi AndrewNigelPorter,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=29.00139&lat=-29.74764&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129144174

Can you pleasr fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
tastrax (2022-11-20 23:17:00+00:00): Many thanks for such great digitising. Good imagery really helps!
Diacritic (2022-11-21 01:37:46+00:00): This edit has moved the traffic light position for 	112597323 well before the point where vehicles stop.

Don't introduce errors just to have a "neat" straight line.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129144716
opendcc (2022-11-20 08:04:03+00:00): Doppeleintrag wurde entfernt. Bitte an die Regeln von OpenStreetMap halten. Danke.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-11-20 11:53:44+00:00): أستاذي العزيز/ نحن هنا نرسم الواقع وليس الخيال وتصنيفك للمكان حسب رأيك لا يصح
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-11-20 11:57:48+00:00): وتصنيف hamlet هو المناسب لهذا المكان ويعني القرية الصغيرة أما التصنيف village فهو لا يناسب هذا المكان ولا يتطابق مع الواقع والصور الفضائية
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-11-20 11:58:21+00:00): أيضاً المكان لا يحتمل وجود عدد سكان كبير ولا يوجد مصدر لعدد السكان الذي تضعه
Zandu (2023-11-20 18:47:03+00:00): Tags relocated to relations to minimize overlapping ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129145846
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-20 07:07:53+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJCZWdpbl9Qb2ludCI6WzAsMzQ4LjQ4OF19&location=38.749042%2C-104.452819%2C15.61&style=ROUTE_NAME
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-20 07:08:12+00:00): https://image-cdn.spatialest.com/file/view/co-elpaso-images/ASRMap/35160.tif?v=210616
NorthCrab (2022-11-20 14:01:37+00:00): Witaj, tag website powinien zaczynać się od http:// lub https://. Inaczej taka wartość uznawana jest za nieprawidłową.

Więcej informacji:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
mavl (2022-11-21 15:02:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Тег "layer=-1" не является подходящим для этой дороги. Дорога не находится ни ниже земли, ни ниже здания. Тег layer здесь не нужен.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:layer
rainerU (2022-11-28 04:48:19+00:00): Hallo ReinholdS,

bitte versehe deine Änderungen mit einem aussagekräftigen Kommentar. Das erleichtert es anderen Mappern, deine Beiträge einzuordnen.

Gruß
rainerU
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129146174
streckenkundler (2022-11-30 16:21:27+00:00): Hei,
irgendwas ist hier an den Relationen https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11905744 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14980 kaputt gegangen.

Siehe auch: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.45904&lat=52.48555&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Ich würde mich gerne aus Berlin bei diesen Details heraushalten.
Danke. Sven
itineris (2024-01-10 18:16:30+00:00): Szia!

A Nyíregyházi út kétpályásításánál a régin hagytad az előre-hátra sávok számát stb. Kérlek, ezeket a menetiránynak megfelelően javítsd, illetve vidd át az általad berajzolt új pályára!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
user_12500175 (2022-11-21 21:35:39+00:00): Hallo Annika123,
klasse dass Du bei OSM mitmachst und mithilfst die Daten zu verbessern.
Eine Anmerkung, du hast im Kleingarten ein building=shed eingetragen. Für kleingarten könnte man auch building=allotment_house eintragen. Du kannst dir ja mal die OSM-WIKI-Seite durchlesen ob das besser passen würde:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dallotment_house

Gruß
Danfost
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-17 14:01:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115655938 - do you know its name?

Rather than just description of object type?
Dino Michelini (2022-11-23 18:08:55+00:00): Ciao, in questo changeset il percorso 1115656161 ha layer=1 ma manca tutto il resto. Per favore completa la classificazione.
eggie (2022-11-20 08:26:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  Geef svp serieus commentaar als je iets aanpast.

Je hebt schade veroorzaakt aan de kaart door het natural water om te taggen naar  waterway=drain Je hebt er een buis van gemaakt. Wat bedoel je met name=visstekje?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-11-20 08:29:23+00:00): reverted by changeset #129147293

Je edits heb ik teruggedraaid wegens schade aan de kaart. 
Graag voorzichtig met de kaart. Realiseer je dat al je aanpassingen daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart komen. 

MVG
eggie
opendcc (2022-11-20 16:21:47+00:00): Was wird das? Editwar?
Ich darf nochmal in aller Höflichkeit, aber auch in aller Bestimmtheit auf die Regeln von OpenStreetMap hinweisen. Wenn Sie damit nicht einverstanden sind, dann benutzen Sie bitte OpenStreetMap nicht.
richlv (2022-11-22 17:13:02+00:00): Hi, thank you so much for the map improvements. The road classification change unclassified->track would need community discussion and consensus, though - I've reverted this changeset for now.

Additionally, in this changeset alt_name and isolated_dwelling tags were removed (this got reverted in bulk for now).
What was the reasoning behind that?

Please note that this is in no way indicating that the changes are good or not good, the main concern is the need to discuss mass changes.

Happy mapping :)
somix (2022-11-22 17:49:13+00:00): Hi

As the wiki says:
- unclassified: The least important through roads in a country's system;
- track: Roads for mostly agricultural or forestry uses.
I change "unclassified" to "track" if road doesn't give access to anything (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993331254) or just to 1-2 isolated dwellings (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083122284), which means that this road is probably mostly used for forestry. I just do it like the wiki says.

I delete isolated dwellings if there's nothing there (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2073747741/history) or there's buildings with different addresses in that place, which means this dwelling is not really isolated. Also, from wiki: The whole settlement must not consist of more than 2 households.
E1J18Q9TWC (2022-11-20 09:04:25+00:00): Thanks
mocdottopsppa (2023-02-13 15:47:12+00:00): 石麻達山為島田山誤植，請參考新竹州竹東郡國有林野圖（1925 - 1935）二十五葉之內第十四號, 今石麻達山原爲島田山。石麻達為島田（しまだ， Shimada）日語發音之音譯，石麻達山即島田山。
mocdottopsppa (2023-02-13 15:52:19+00:00): 這個討論串裏有附圖：
https://www.facebook.com/groups/664516810370602?multi_permalinks=2276937732461827&hoisted_section_header_type=recently_seen
ORF0RLDR2K (2022-11-21 13:01:16+00:00): Thanks
Dino Michelini (2022-11-23 18:34:04+00:00): I viali alberati non possono essere disegnati con un’unica linea ma tanti segmenti in base alle intersezioni con le strade. Per favore correggi.
pitfire (2022-11-29 05:28:47+00:00): Hi Frosch42,
kleiner Tipp zu Parkflächen.
parking=surface benötigen eine Zufahrt, oder es ist parking=street_side mit parking:orientation
Gruss pitfire
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 06:25:11+00:00): What you mean by shop=survey for example on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2222112017/history ?

Why artwork has shop=survey tag?
Pavol33 (2023-03-20 06:46:11+00:00): Hallo,

Sorry. Es sollte source=survey sein.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 06:55:09+00:00): Should I fix then what https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1sCC finds?