piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Verdy_p (2022-02-17 22:05:12+00:00): This is not a "collection" of unrelated items but the way it is really and exactly composed.
Why are you editing throughout Europe, without any contact with anyone in France or comments in French?
Technically, the municapalities that are part of each postal area are also part of the address (the name of the zone is that of its central post office, but is no longer needed on postal addresses in France: the last addresss line just gives the postal code, and the municipality, which may be a local submunicipality at level 9 instead of level 8 in some cases of municipalities that are "softly merged" in associations with a single council, but still separate territories represented in that council)
It also happens that in some of the most populated cities, there may be several postal areas with distinct codes: they exist because there are multiple central post offices. A central post office can then be composed of full municipalities, or submunicipalites with known boundaries (the same as administrative ones at level 8 or 9).
So these subareas are effectively relevant in France postal addresses. Do not mix that with your assumption as you've seen them in Germany, where you live.
user_177389 (2022-02-24 07:37:29+00:00): I've re-added the subareas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117799581
praeteritum (2022-07-23 22:23:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123991884.
maraf24 (2022-02-19 19:00:45+00:00): Jakie jest źródło dla tej zmiany?
jaco10 (2022-02-19 19:06:10+00:00): Jechałem ostatnio w kierunku Przeworska i widziałem, że są prowadzone tam już wstępne prace.
maraf24 (2022-02-19 20:13:11+00:00): Tylko na południowym odcinku.
gscscnd (2022-02-17 19:27:07+00:00): Linia energetyczna <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139452067> ma punkty wspólne z elementami innymi niż słupy energetyczne.
wireguy (2022-02-18 18:29:01+00:00): Mike, your 3 changesets to Tiger Point broke all the water, wetland, residential, and golf relations.   Can you revert your changesets or fix the issues?
MikeJonson3845 (2022-03-05 22:10:31+00:00): I am sorry. I don't quite understand what I did.  Unfortunately I don't know how to revert changes.  If you can share the method, I will do that from now.  As far as golf features, please explain what I did wrong?  I am not sure where these wetlands were that I destroyed.  Please advise.  I apologise.  I was not trying to remove stuff that would affect other stuff.
wireguy (2022-03-05 23:32:08+00:00): Here's a pic of things that are wrong and should be fixed: https://i.imgur.com/M8gyRG3.png

here's a link on how to map golf courses correctly:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2022-03-10 05:17:30+00:00): Multipolygons have been repaired and fixed by me in changesets 118303238 and 118302822. Let me know if anything else needs fixing.
wireguy (2022-03-10 12:33:00+00:00): Thanks for corrections Roll!   I removed the lollipops and added some other cleanups in 118322103
praeteritum (2022-07-23 22:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123991866.
eggie (2022-02-17 17:56:32+00:00): building = house komt van het kadaster en was dus oke.
building=yes is algemeen. 
Paar keer ctrl-F5 om effect te zien.
FERINA365 (2022-03-06 13:13:34+00:00): Ha. Ik zie dat je wat vragen hebt over bus 716. Ik zal van de week even het een en ander nalopen met een survey (met name op Bedrijvenpark Hoeksche Waard). Ik zal terugkoppelen wat ik gewijzigd heb.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:59:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123991512.
mueschel (2022-03-07 18:04:06+00:00): could you check the tagging of this way? "fe" looks like a mistake:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/748983922
Frans S (2022-02-20 14:17:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please restrict yourself to the goal of this project. Map buildings and roads. Not woods. (makes no sense) These will be mapped outside a project. The woods are not restricted to a single task. 
Best regards

Map buildings just as building=yes
Solve the issues reported by the warning triangle on iDeditor before you upload your work,
aceman444 (2022-04-03 09:04:41+00:00): Ak je tam len jeden pruh pre oba smery, pridajte lanes=1, cim vyjadrite to co ste dali do popisu.
Patr1k_P (2022-02-18 15:08:59+00:00): v niektorych adresach chyba conscriptionnumber, v niektorych streetnumber a place so streetnumber by nemali byt spolu
Leo Slager (2022-02-18 00:11:40+00:00): Top, dat heb je goed gezien.
Het zijn geen fietspaden.
ik heb nog wat overbodige tags verwijderd.
foot=yes hoeft er niet op.
segregated heeft betrekking op de combinatie fietspad/trottoir. Die zijn er niet dus segregated hoort er niet op.
ergens op een klein stukje was motorvehicle=no vergeten.
Best wel een steile leercurve zo 
:-)
groet, Leo
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-22 15:34:10+00:00): Why was the building changed to a wood?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117532947
nmac85 (2022-02-23 16:44:36+00:00): apologies. corrected.
Frans S (2022-02-22 10:17:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please keep yourselve to the instructions of the project. 
Landscape mapping is not part of this project and can not be  mapped because the structure of the tasks are nog good to map large areas,
The visible buildings were not mapped. !
Best regards
eggie (2022-02-18 07:05:41+00:00): Dag jhnijman  
Lastig die accesstags... 
Beter geen access=yes gaan taggen op wegen waar ook andere restricties zijn,

Ik zie dat Leo al e.e.a. heeft aangepast.

Gr eggie
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:59:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123991498.
gscscnd (2022-02-17 19:35:52+00:00): 1. Czy w „Boisko Szkolne” drugi wyraz nie powinien rozpoczynać się małą literą?
2. Jeżeli dodajesz obrys szkoły (amenity=school) wokół obrysu budynku amenity=school building=*, to przenieś z tego drugiego wszystkie tagi niezwiązane z budynkiem (np. name, website).
3. Do nazwy szkoły nie dodawaj końcówki „w Rybniku”.
cytryn (2022-02-18 18:10:33+00:00): Ad.1 To w ogóle nie powinno się znaleźć w nazwie, bo to nie jest nazwa własna, podobnie jak nie dajemy np. name=Budynek szkoły... Jest boiskiem i jest na terenie szkoły, więc to jasne, że jest boiskiem szkolnym ;)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw.C4.85
gscscnd (2022-02-22 21:08:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117744437
DaveF (2022-02-18 22:48:12+00:00): Hi
You've added a couple of spurious railway station to platform nodes.
HillWithSmallFields (2022-02-19 08:44:33+00:00): Thanks --- not intentional!  I've fixed it now, and gathered the parts of the station into a relation.
ZLima12 (2022-09-06 00:42:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125834870 . Please map in accordance with the NYS Classification Guidelines, which would make this part of NY-5S highway=primary with expressway=yes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117533978
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:57:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123991449.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-17 20:38:00+00:00): Please do not use the name to describe a feature.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
ZLima12 (2022-09-06 00:42:36+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125834870 . Please map in accordance with the NYS Classification Guidelines, which would make this part of NY-5S highway=primary with expressway=yes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117534387
mavl (2022-02-25 09:12:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет несуществующие проезды. Например, нет проезда  

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032670736  
  
Невозможно проехать на автомобиле так, как проходит этот проезд. Также невозможно проехать на автомобиле между домами с номерам 3 и 5.
mavl (2022-02-25 09:12:58+00:00): И, конечно, на этих проездах нет асфальта. Это просто нонсенс.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:52:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123991286.
eggie (2022-02-18 07:29:54+00:00): ,,,moped=no  (Dat zal haast wel)  gaat over in moped=designated..  (Dat zal haast niet)
Fietspad Surinameplein naar Hoofdweg. 

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117535074
Misschien nog eens goed kijken.

Gr eggie
JASMein03M (2022-02-18 21:23:13+00:00): Oeps ja, dat klopt inderdaad niet.
eggie (2022-02-18 21:31:52+00:00): 'k Denks dat in A'dam veel nog niet is bijgewerkt.. Snor en bromfietsen worden nu van de fietspaden geweerd middel sborden.
Mapse
eggie
skyper (2022-02-18 02:39:15+00:00): Hallo Alex
Deine Änderungen passen irgendwie nicht zu "destination sign korrigiert ". Ich finde nur eine neue "turn restriction".
Weiterhin frage ich mich warum Du Straßen in Tuttlingen und Singen in einem Änderungssatz geändert hast. Das macht es unnötigerweise unübersichtlich.
Wurde der OBI-Parkplatz in Singen wirklich so zurückgebaut, wie Du es geändert hast? Auf den Luftbildern kann ich davon nichts erkennen.
Last but not least, warum hast Du den Kreisverkehr der Georg-Fischer-Straße in vier Teile zerlegt? Wenn Du so etwas machst, achte bitte auf alle Routen-Relationen und passe sie entsprechend an. Zusätzlich hat iD mal wieder die Mitglieder von beiden Varianten der Buslinie 4 durcheinandergewürfelt, siehe ab https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=855207#p855207 

Kannst Du Dir das bitte nochmal anschauen und korrigieren.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2022-02-18 03:05:42+00:00): Ah, zum Parkplatz habe ich diesen Hinweis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2677296) entdeckt. Da hast sich wohl was getan.
Alex-r95 (2022-02-18 21:08:35+00:00): Hi,

hoffe die Relation passt so, habe den KV auch vereinigt.

Danke für die Infos
skyper (2022-02-20 16:36:38+00:00): Hey
War schon besser, aber die Variante zum ZOB hatte noch eine Lücke. Wurde bereits korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117644082

Zum Prüfen verwende ich die JOSM Erweiterung "pt_assistant" und PTNA (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117644082), aber auch OSMI enthält eine Prüfung.
Habe den Kreisverkehr jetzt trotzdem aufgeteilt, da es mit PTv2 schöner ist und Du ja schon drei weiter Linien erstellt hattest.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2022-03-21 14:12:31+00:00): Hi Alex
Jetzt habe ich auch verstanden, was Du mit "destination sign korrigiert " meinst. Du beziehst dich auf `destination`, `destination:ref` und so weiter mit :lanes-Tagging. Ichbin von `type=destination_sign`-Relationen ausgegangen.
Vor allem "sign" finde ich im Kommentar verwirrend. Vielleicht ist "destination korrigiert" besser.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:38:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123991044.
yrtimiD (2022-05-06 22:43:20+00:00): vandalism: reverted
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:30:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990890.
yrtimiD (2022-05-06 22:43:13+00:00): vandalism: reverted
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:26:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990858.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:25:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990852.
Luzandro (2022-02-19 07:18:54+00:00): Hallo,

bitte nur die Eigenschaften entfernen, die nicht mehr aktuell sind. Du hast das gesamte Gebäude incl. Adresse gelöscht - ich habe das wiederhergestellt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117536017
obs42 (2022-02-19 10:36:18+00:00): Danke für die Info. Werde mir ansehen, wie ich es beim nächsten Mal richtig mache!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117536017
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:25:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990846.
aceman444 (2022-02-18 21:06:41+00:00): What tag did you add? Converting completely correct crossing=uncontrolled to the needless crossing=marked invented by iD editor is no improvement. Stop with these damaging conversions.

Adding new crossings with unmarked or traffic_lights values is useful, thanks.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990601.
maro21 (2022-02-25 19:28:36+00:00): W tym miejscu nakładają się cieki: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/347732313#map=19/51.21348/16.98823
maro21 (2022-02-25 19:30:58+00:00): Nie wiem czy to ty je dodałeś, bo to ciężko sprawdzić jak się tnie linię na części
Rzezimierz (2022-02-27 10:38:13+00:00): Poprawione! Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi!
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:13:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990533.
b-unicycling (2022-10-22 10:57:27+00:00): The use of historic=* for a number or date is not correct, start_date is the preferrred key in such a case.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:10:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990422.
HirschKauz (2022-02-24 12:20:57+00:00): Hi PatrickKnopf 
soweit ich weiß werden mehrere Werte mit [;] getrennt statt [, ] oder liege ich da falsch?
Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117537128
PatrickKnopf (2022-02-24 19:40:47+00:00): Hallo HirschKauz,
hast Recht, hab's geändert.
Danke & schöne Grüße
aceman444 (2022-04-03 09:37:01+00:00): Zdravim, len preto, ze je cesta nespevnena, neznamena, ze to to lesna/polna cesta (track). povrch sa vyjadruje cez 'surface' co ste urobili dobre. Ale ak je to vjazd na parkovisko, tak nie je dovod na 'track'. Ta druha cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484706997 neviem k comu sluzi, takze 'track' moze aj zostat.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:08:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990365.
Frans S (2022-02-21 15:18:31+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117537884
user_5359 (2022-03-06 11:15:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13815927 (one of eleven relation). Did you mean implicit instead of impicit? 

If you need help for correction: You are welcome.
Baconcrisp (2022-03-07 15:20:13+00:00): I did mean "implicit". Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I'll make the corrections now. Please let me know if you find anything else!
aceman444 (2022-04-03 11:52:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9514915767 ked je tam zakazane prechadzat, ma byt len crossing=no, ostatne znacky su zbytocne (pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dno). Prosim nevymyslajte si znacky ako illegal a unauthorized, kde to nie je potrebne.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:02:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990241.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:00:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990228.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 21:00:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990223.
J-MUC (2022-02-18 21:03:57+00:00): Interessehalber: Was war an dem website tag so falsch und unnötig, dass es komplett entfernt werden musste, anstatt es zu verbessern?
Emilius123 (2022-02-18 22:55:01+00:00): Ha. Gute Frage. Der website-tag hier war auf den Filialfinder gesetzt. Ich ging davon aus, das war ein Versehen, beabsichtigt war, einen Link zu genau dieser Filiale im Filialfinder zu haben, was auf der Görtz Website aber leider nicht möglich ist.

Nun hatte ich folgende Möglichkeiten der Korrektur:

* website oder brand:website auf nur Homepage, baeckergoertz.de setzen

* Einfach gar kein website-Tag


Da ich es sonst auch immer so mache, habe ich mich für Letzteres entschieden. Nicht wirklich mehr. Ersteres ginge aber natürlich auch.


Ich danke dir wirklich für deine genaue Aufmerksamkeit und deine Kritik, so etwas braucht OSM.

Die Bäckerei sei nun deine, mache hier was du willst. Entschuldige bitte meine faule Erstlösung.
J-MUC (2022-02-19 12:29:51+00:00): Hallo Emilius123,

kenne und verstehe das Problem, geht mir oft genug ähnlich.
Eine dritte Option wäre gewesen, den website-tag einfach so zu belassen, wie er war, er war ja nicht weitgehend komplett daneben wie z.B. ein "access=yes" auf einer Treppe es in vielen Fällen wäre. Rein aus Nutzersicht wäre es mir persönlich lieber, über die URL vielleicht nicht direkt auf einer super sinnvollen Seite zu landen, aber immerhin in der richtigen Gegend, als gar keine URL zu haben und noch weiter weg anfangen zu müssen, einen Zugang zu finden.
Wie auch immer, eine URL für die gesamte Marke auf einer einzelnen Filiale entsprechend Deiner Möglichkeit 1 scheint weithin akzeptiert (wenn nicht gar bevorzugt, da fehlt mir die Erfahrung), d.h. werde entsprechend aktualisieren.
amadvance (2022-02-18 20:11:06+00:00): Ciao Ardiccio,

Ho visto che hai modificato le way che compongono la relazione CAI 206. 
Ti faccio presente che i tag "ref", "osmc:symbol", "network", "route" e "cai_scale" non vanno messi sulle way in quanto ci sono già sulla relazione. 

Il tag "surface" invece va sicuramente bene.

Sono cose documentate nella pagina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Hiking

Ad esempio dice: "Si ricorda di inserire ref e operator solo alla relazione e non alle singole way che lo compongono."

Puoi correggere?

Grazie,
Andrea
Ardiccio (2022-02-19 08:47:03+00:00): Ciao Andrea, grazie mille per le tue osservazioni, ho provveduto a eliminare i tag dalle tratte, spero di aver fatto tutto correttamente.
Riccardo
amadvance (2022-02-19 16:42:59+00:00): Perfetto!
praeteritum (2022-07-23 20:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990184.
Strubbl (2022-02-18 11:02:26+00:00): Hallo Splette, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die Gebäudeart erfasst man am besten, in dem das Tag building vom aktuellen Wert "yes" spezifiert. Z.B. für die Garage: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dgarage

Weitere Werte für andere Arten von Gebäuden findest du im Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Geb%C3%A4ude#Werte

Bitte nicht den name-Tag dafür nutzen. Der wird genau dann genutzt, wenn etwas einen eigenen Namen hat. Mehr Info darüber siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names

Mit dem folgenden Änderungssatz habe ich das für diese beiden Gebäude geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117559250

Viele Grüße und viel Spaß beim Mappen,
Sven
praeteritum (2022-07-23 20:57:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123990138.
Tomas Straupis (2022-02-18 06:01:52+00:00): You've changed correct tagging to incorrect one. Please check local rules before doing semiautomated changes. Change reverted.
eggie (2022-02-18 07:09:31+00:00): Beste Pwarde.. Wanneer een bedrijf verdwijnt  (dat kan)  laat dan het BAG adres intact.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-18 07:10:52+00:00): Adres nr 14 hersteld
LarsKienzel (2023-01-21 07:37:47+00:00): This golf course was closed several years ago. It is now a park. https://www.icrc.net/parks/mungo-park
aceman444 (2023-02-11 09:36:11+00:00): Hi, this changeset does not fix much of any real 'issues', mostly add unnecessary autogenerated tags like 'brand' (let's hope it is correct). And the change to relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2529470 is outright wrong (it is a disabled public transport relation so it should not have an type=public_transport tag). Please do not just blindly apply what the iD editor offers you. It is know to have wrong suggestions and causes damage.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-22 00:32:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
There are a number of issues with your edit.
It appears you accidentally dragged some nodes on the motorway and you added a nonexistent footpath https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1032715877
The incorrect changes have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117705689
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117539589
Pontius (2022-02-17 22:25:58+00:00): You can do this by drawing a line tracing the interior, holding shift while selecting the interior line and the exterior line, and then right clicking and selecting the "+" icon to merge the two lines into a relation.
Pontius (2022-02-17 22:26:07+00:00): Thanks for contributing!
eggie (2022-02-18 07:12:19+00:00): Beste Olivier... Houd het gebied van je edits  kleiner. Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat geeft vaak schade.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-18 07:18:45+00:00): Tja wat is wijsheid? Je ziet geen carpoolplaats. 
Die carpoolplaatsen tag ik zelf met amenity=parking
parking=car_pooling
amenity=carpooling wordt nog niet ondersteund.
Gr eggie
BCNorwich (2022-02-18 08:36:03+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It looks like you've only added a few nodes but these have dragged features out of alignment. I've removed the un-needed nodes, all's OK now.

Need any help please just ask, Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-02-18 08:46:15+00:00): Are you trying to add your business, I might be able to help, just ask.

Please don't advertise the business on your profile, it doesn't meet OSM good practice.

Regards Bernard.
enezeg (2023-08-28 16:10:39+00:00): Bonjour,
je me permet de passer certains de vos ajouts de meadow en farmland. Dans ce secteur, les prairies/couverts végétaux sont souvent temporaires. Je pense que farmland est plus générique et donc plus adapté que meadow, à moins de pouvoir mettre à jour en fonction des rotations de culture. Est-ce que c'est bon pour vous ?
praeteritum (2022-07-23 20:55:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123989933.
5m4u9 (2022-02-17 22:47:26+00:00): no era necesario duplicar etiquetas si ya tiene en el mutipoligono...
eggie (2022-02-18 07:23:58+00:00): Het Groene Hart Ziekenhuis staat nu 2x op de kaart. (adresnode)
Wellicht is 1x genoeg.

MVG
eggie
praeteritum (2022-07-23 20:39:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123989703.
philam48 (2022-05-10 00:39:39+00:00): Hi there, I'd be interested to know what source you've used to change the classification of Southern Road and Chifley Drive. I can't see anything from the Council or VicRoads to indicate any change in classification.
Diacritic (2022-05-10 05:19:18+00:00): Hey Phil!

Hope you are well :).

I didn't rely on any official source for this changing of classification, I ultimately relied on local knowledge.   I made the change to align the clasisfication of Southern Road/Murray Road and Waterdale Road. Southern Road is busier than Waterdale Road as both a through way (to get to Albert) and a destination (Northland).

I updated Chifley in turn, but looking at it again with fresh eyes I probably would say I've over-egged the importance of that road, at the very least; Tertiary is probably more appropriate for that road.

Spending quite a bit of time over the last few months cleaning the wiki guidelines pages has helped me gain a better understanding of the subtleties in highway classification. I'm much more on the fence about the grading of Southern Road than I was, and if you are strongly in favour of changing it back to secondary I wouldn't object.
praeteritum (2022-07-23 20:35:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123989602.
Patr1k_P (2022-02-18 15:13:38+00:00): aj tu to treba opravit, place sa dava vtedy ak nie su ulice