piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OddlyAngled (2021-09-07 14:00:03+00:00): @stevea "that the relation IN the Ukraine didn't change" is incorrect, this changeset dropped the natural=wood tag from it. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12412862/history perhaps you can fix the issue.
stevea (2021-09-07 14:29:30+00:00): OddlyAngled, there is no "@" prefixing my name.  Thank you for noticing my error that I dropped the natural=wood tag on a multipolygon.  I have "fixed the issue."

SekeRob, you sure are good at using tools to characterize what OSM Contributors do wrong — or so you and your power tools think.  OddlyAngled was able to offer me a SPECIFIC problem which I was able to SPECIFICALLY solve.  Can you do the same about any of my edits?  Or do you simply like to notice that after 19000 edits, some tiny fraction of them (none of which are specified) can have a statistical tool applied to them to "pick out fluff" and "cause a bell to ring?"

I have absolutely no problem with my OSM contributions, as the great majority are positive.  Because I am human, I, you, everybody makes the occasional mistake.  If you can specify a problem, do so.  If all you can to is pull the trigger on QA tools that cause bells to ring, well, have fun, but don't bother me with their summary reports, as I or anybody can do that, too.
Jarek 🚲 (2021-09-09 14:22:16+00:00): Hello all,

I found this discussion while trying to quickly find out which edit might have broken Highway 401 routing near Mississauga Road. As you seem to be quite experienced OSM contributors, can you point me to a more reliable way of quickly checking the edit history of a area than the "History" tab on openstreetmap.org?

Thank you,
Jarek
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
WoodWoseWulf (2021-09-07 21:32:04+00:00): Hi digital_pro,

I'm not sure that I understand what you added here. It appears to be a park named Cat Farm in a residential front yard? 

Are you sure you've got the right tagging and the right location?
digital_pro (2021-09-07 22:03:18+00:00): My bad. Wrong location. I've deleted. Thanks for the heads up!
ivanbranco (2021-11-30 18:39:18+00:00): Hi Sierralm,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980398718/history

route=subway should be used in a relation, not on a way
ovruni (2021-09-07 05:26:39+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios que se menciona "Mejorando" se han eliminado varias vías de la plaza, estas vías son necesarias para el señalar por donde se movilizan los peatones, ya que las áreas no indican esto. He recuperado las vías.
Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
TuAmigoElEditor (2021-09-09 20:19:22+00:00): Hola, supuse que como el area estaba catalogado como Pedestrian Area no tenia que identificar las vias de peatones. Tendre en cuenta ese detalle.
Saludos
Mashin (2021-09-07 15:32:18+00:00): Hi Jack,
some of those shapes might need a bit of simplification to reduce the node count (but still preserve details)

There is a SimplifyArea plugin for JOSM that can be tuned well
hethi (2021-11-21 22:11:31+00:00): Das ganze Areal wird gerade neu bebaut und völlig anders strukturiert. Die Wege existieren nicht mehr.
hethi (2021-11-21 22:12:58+00:00): Why did you change this? It doesn't exist anymore.
daitv (2021-11-23 09:12:09+00:00): Hello Hethi, 
Thanks for bringing this up to my notice. I have added the roads based on relatively older imagery. I have now deleted these segments as per your suggestion and did not add any new roads as there are no latest resources. Please refer to the changeset ( 114130578) for your reference. Thanks again for reminding me about the updates. 
Thanks and Regards,
daitv.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-14 16:21:19+00:00): 尊敬的罗飞龙：
    您好！
    我是OSM China的社区负责人，您的这个编辑是一个显然无意义的编辑，对地图的正常渲染造成了破坏。我已在新的修改集内回退了它（https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111204216）。若有其他mapper再次反馈您的破坏行为，我们将提请OSMF的DWG对您进行封禁。

祝编安

快乐的老鼠宝宝
2021.9.15
Stalker61 (2021-09-07 17:24:30+00:00): Лихая лестница!
Evgeniy Listyuk (2021-09-08 00:35:24+00:00): Изначально сделал «тропа». Но… это же лестница))) надо ещё одну ветку нарисовать. А после ещё одну )))
j numminen (2021-09-07 05:33:28+00:00): Dear MelusBou, the source you have used may be too old, leading you to make inappropriate changes to Kiertomäentie.

I drove past this road entrance just a few days ago and saw a row of bollards that you claimed are not there. The node https://www.osm.org/node/7684446674 should not have been removed.
ChehrehBargi (2021-09-13 19:01:32+00:00): سلام
علی آقا تقاطع آیت‌الله کاشانی و بزرگراه بسیج به هم متصل نیست. تصحیح‌ش کردم. لطفا مطمئن بشید و بعد ثبت تغییرات کنید.
باسپاس
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:10:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
alga (2021-10-11 19:10:17+00:00): WTF, dude.
Witska (2021-10-11 19:40:40+00:00): Kas čia negerai?
alga (2021-10-11 21:59:31+00:00): Pirma, nesusiję pakeitimai po visą šalį vienam commite, antra, kad kelią Lentvary, kurį pažymėjau kaip atidarytą, nes juo vyksta eismas, pavertei atgal highway=construction.
Witska (2021-10-11 22:03:02+00:00): Parodyk man ta kelia kuri aš pakeičiau.
Witska (2021-10-11 22:07:44+00:00): Šitas, pažiūrėk istoriją https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919604266/history dude
alga (2021-10-11 22:21:12+00:00): Ups, sorry :)
Aranc (2021-09-07 17:31:05+00:00): this church isn't rendered as a building like parrocchia s.gabriele? only gray landuse
SekeRob (2021-09-07 17:44:01+00:00): Yup, I noticed. The tags seem fine though and not everything in carto is rendered proper, building parts not at all, just the building outline which it is typed as i.e. type=building + building=yes, this grey outline though a first for me. Waiting for QA and the 3D progs to give their opinion. As you can see in the change set the relation block in front has the brown colour  i.e. it knows it's a building.
Aranc (2021-09-07 17:47:19+00:00): yes I see now thanks for the explanation. greetings from croatia
SekeRob (2021-09-07 17:48:42+00:00): I have a suspicion though why this is happening, so patience grass hoppers.
SekeRob (2021-09-08 12:01:28+00:00): Hi,

Have a look now... 3D was already perfect in Streetcomplete, just needed to move the tags to the outline to get the grey to render as church brown.

ciao from Italia
Aranc (2021-09-08 12:40:50+00:00): Looks good now. Have a nice day!
ZeLonewolf (2021-09-07 11:14:22+00:00): I have deleted your recent edits.  Please stop spamming SEO links.
Protoxenus (2023-03-03 16:12:33+00:00): Betreiben wir hier jetzt "Raten nach Luftbildern?" Wenn nicht klar ist, was sich da befindet, einfach mal die Finger davon lassen.
soemisch (2023-03-07 06:42:50+00:00): Hallo P., das ist ganz meine Meinung aber sei nicht so streng. Vielleicht haben sich die Luftbilder verbessert nach zwei Jahren ;o)) Grüße Lars
miscosm (2021-09-14 09:43:16+00:00): Hallo Uhkabu,

wie kommst Du bei dem Schlosswaldäcker-Weg auf bicycle=yes?

Oben war schon immer ein Zeichen 250 "Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art" und seit ca. einem halben Jahr auch unten an der Burgstraße.

Mich stört es auch, dass man da mit dem Rad nicht durch darf und ich werde da demnächst mal bei der Stadt nachhaken. Der Weg wurde je gerade neu geteert und ist nicht mehr so hubelig wie früher.

Dennoch sollten wir die Verkehrzeichen in OSM korrekt abbilden.
Uhkabu (2021-09-14 12:40:44+00:00): Stimmt, danke für den Hinweis. Das Schild hängt dort wirklich. Ich habe es bereits wieder zurückgeändert. Da man hochwärts auch nicht auf der Burgstraße fahren darf, wäre der Weg eigentlich geeignet.
eggie (2021-09-07 19:12:54+00:00): Oke.. nu nog de juiste format voor phone .
+31 6....
Zie ook recent draadje op het forum van osm
Mapse
Eggie
Kovoschiz (2021-09-07 08:09:59+00:00): Although it is true there were `building=` used wrongly instead of `building:part=`, these are separate towers on top of the podium, that should be `building=` + `building:min_level=`
Kovoschiz (2021-09-07 08:15:23+00:00): You need to modify the `building:levels=` accordingly on both  as well even if so. In case, please don't blindly follow validators.
NunoCaldiera (2021-09-09 09:21:37+00:00): 好的亲爱的
NunoCaldiera (2021-09-09 09:21:50+00:00): 好的亲爱的
adiatmad (2021-09-07 07:40:09+00:00): Hi Chetan_Gowda. Hope you are doing great.
Yes, this is a fictional mapping but unfortunately OSMCha doesn't flag this one
(https://osmcha.org/changesets/110699823/)

How do you notice this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110836193
Chetan_Gowda (2021-09-07 09:35:56+00:00): Hi Adiatmad, I found it randomly while explaining a new joiner "How to map in JOSM?" :) And deleted those badly traced large buildings. Good learning for new joiner.
adiatmad (2021-09-07 11:36:19+00:00): Thank you for your reply. It was a questionable edit but good learning for new joiner.
Based on your edit, I submit this ticket (https://github.com/mapbox/osmcha-frontend/issues/580)

Happy mapping =)
Ser9ei (2021-09-07 07:37:11+00:00): Сначала читаем: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
Потом исправляем теги.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110836216
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
abrensch (2022-02-06 18:26:50+00:00): Hallo soemisch,

hier ist Dir scheinbar was "verrutscht"

3 Nebenstrassen der Rostocker Strasse haben jetzt diesen extremen knick

Schaust Du mal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
soemisch (2022-02-14 06:40:09+00:00): Hallo Arndt, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe den Fußweg wieder in Richtung NW verschoben, so dass alles wieder schick ist. Entschuldige bitte.
Grüße, Lars
pop72204 (2021-09-07 11:36:14+00:00): Amazing!
rempshaener (2021-09-07 15:40:06+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du dir deine Änderung noch einmal anschauen?
Du hast 70 km/h als Höchstgeschwindigkeit ergänzt, obwohl bereits
maxspeed:backward=70
maxspeed:forward=50
eingetragen waren.
Die Eintragungen passen nun nicht mehr zusammen. Die 50/70 dürften auch so passen.
Viele Grüße
rockichurch (2021-09-08 09:25:48+00:00): Hallo rempshaener.
Ja, du hast recht. War irritiert, da in der Gesamtübersicht im Feld für die Höchstgeschwindigkeit nichts angegeben war. Habe nicht den Eigenschaften nachgesehen... Hatte nicht darauf geachtet. Sorry.
rempshaener (2021-09-08 17:03:42+00:00): Kein Problem, ich habe es angepasst.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110930718
travaudat (2021-10-16 13:24:46+00:00): Hi MapAbility, what was your reason for changing the bus route names? For now, I reverted them to the version before yours. That followed guidelines from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses ("The 'name' of a bus route should follow a specific format and is not the official name of the bus route. [...]"). Thanks, travaudat
Futur3r (2021-09-07 09:12:14+00:00): Nan mais .... amenity=watering_place, c'est parce que c'est un abreuvoir à la base !

Vous rajoutez drinking_water=yes pour spécifier que l'eau est potable
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110840454
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-03 10:39:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113325200 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI edits of unknown provenance where the editor has refused contact with the US community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5420 ..
julcnx (2021-09-07 13:02:38+00:00): Hi Kurt. Just curious, where do you get the data for the streams? I often want to add more but I find it very difficult to guess them from satellite imagery. Cheers, Julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110840655
mike140 (2021-09-07 10:45:18+00:00): Что находится в этом здании?
yatut (2021-09-07 11:58:11+00:00): раніше - це була дореволюційна дача, потім приміщення школи, зараз будинок не використовується
mike140 (2021-09-07 13:07:36+00:00): То есть, так называют это здание местные жители?
yatut (2021-09-07 17:57:01+00:00): так
Carto'Cité (2022-01-13 10:21:30+00:00): Bonjour Romy G,
Tu as supprimé les pistes (sur trottoir) ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164756859
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349046762
et dans leur continuité. Or, on voit encore bien les séparations sur les photos Mapillary plus récentes que la suppression :
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=544117713538288
Je pense que c'est une erreur. Après elle ne sont pas très bien décrites avec cycleway=track. Je le remets quand même et je te laisse revenir vers moi si tu as une autre information :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2022-01-13 10:28:56+00:00): Vu le nombre de discontinuité, je vais le décrire tel qu'il est sur le terrain avec les coupures et ajouter une note pour expliquer.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
wkdgs (2021-09-07 12:18:41+00:00): Hallo,

ich schreibe dir, weil du angegeben hast, dass sich nochmal jemand deine Änderungen ansehen soll.

Deine Änderungen sehen soweit gut aus. Wenn du noch mehr Informationen hast (Öffnungszeiten, Webseite etc.) wäre es noch gut die auch zu ergänzen.

Was mir aufgefallen ist, ist dass du keinen Kommentar zu deiner Änderung hinterlassen hast. Die sind aber wichtig, damit andere deine Änderungen nachvollziehen können. Es reicht eine kurze Beschreibung dessen, was man geändert hat (z.B. "KFZ-Handel hinzugefügt") und am besten einer Quellenangabe. 

Im ID-Editor gibt es dafür ein Dropdown, mit dem man eine Quelle auswählen kann. Wie das bei Vespucci ist, weiß ich leider nicht. Die Quelle kann man alternativ auch über den "source=*"-Tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:source) an das neu hinzugefügte Objekt anhängen. Wenn man vor Ort war, wäre das z.B. "source=survey".

LG
winkeldings
Tijgerd (2021-09-08 06:42:16+00:00): Goedemorgen Styreen,
Ik ben het niet helemaal eens met je wijziging.
volgens https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:leisure%3Dplayground kan een speeltuin/speelzone onderdeel van een school zijn.
Ik denk dat het logischer is om het daadwerkelijke schoolgebouw als school te taggen óf om een extra area aan te maken waar zowel het gebouw als het speelveld in vallen.
Tijgerd (2021-09-08 06:46:03+00:00): Volgens de wiki dus: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=school?uselang=en  (Single school on one site)
styreen (2021-09-08 09:24:32+00:00): Goedemorgen Tijgerd,

Dankjewel voor je reactie. Heel fijn dat je mee helpt.
Je hebt gelijk dat mijn wijziging niet helemaal conform de richtlijnen zijn. Je tweede voorstel om een "area" te maken van het hele gebied, waarin een gebouw, speeltuin en schoolplein binnen vallen spreekt mij wel aan. Ik kan het wel proberen te maken, maar misschien moet ik er dan eerst nog even langs fietsen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
osmviborg (2021-09-07 08:40:26+00:00): Kombination af 3* highway=service og 2* steps som ender i en cykelsti???
kortgodt (2021-09-07 08:50:09+00:00): Har blot sat trappen ind hvor den retteligt er. om adgangvejen skal omklassificeres vil jeg overlade til andre.
J-MUC (2021-09-07 08:37:01+00:00): Hmm, actually, I realize there are street names in Achenkirch, e.g. Obere Dorfstraße. However, it seems addresses are still numbered for the entire place, not per individual street. So will think about that a bit more, see whether anyone else has any thoughts, and then re-add a street name for this object, Obere Dorfstraße instead of Achenkirch.
Luzandro (2021-09-07 13:25:55+00:00): It is not that uncommon to only add street names, but continue to use conscription numbers instead of introducing orientation numbers. (IMHO it only adds to confusion and often you have to completely re-address it at a later time anyway, like Neulengbach recently, which leads to ambiguous housenumbers during the transition phase)
J-MUC (2021-09-07 14:37:33+00:00): Hi Luzandro,

Thanks for your feedback! Indeed it seems that is how it is done for most of the buildings (at least that subset that I looked at) in Achenkirch. I.e. a street name is given plus a house number, with that number being a subscription number (thanks for that term!). So I was to re-add the street name.
However, after initially only trying to solve at an editorial level an issue flagged by Osmose, I found that there might be more amiss in this case.
Namely, this node represents a bus stop, not a building. And at least those bus stops in the vicinity that I checked have neither a street name, nor a house number, or any other address information for that matter. Also not sure where the given phone number would take me.
I get the distinct impression that at some point, someone was mistaking this bus stop node for the adjacent MPREIS store it was named after, and adding store information to the bus stop node.
So I'd think that some attributes could/should perhaps be removed altogether.
Thoughts?
Luzandro (2021-09-08 05:41:07+00:00): Yeah, you're right. The phone number doesn't match the one given on the MPreis website, but it was added 10 years ago via wheelmap.org, so I guess it was a mistake and you can remove it.
J-MUC (2021-09-11 10:55:54+00:00): Ok, thanks for the feedback!
Just removed the phone number as well as the address details.
wkdgs (2021-09-08 11:57:17+00:00): Hallo,

der Tag "access=private" impliziert die ganzen anderen "private"-Tags. Hab die daher die restlichen Tags entfernt.

LG
winkeldings