piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2019-05-13 09:37:49+00:00): Ich kann mit animal:de=* gut leben. Ich bin nur mal wieder frustriert wegen den oft anzutreffenden Unterschieden zw. englischer und deutscher Wiki-Fassung und dann auch noch zwischen Wiki und Realität / überwiegender Mapping-Praxis.
Grüße
ma-rt-in (2019-05-12 13:12:58+00:00): Hallo,
in Altona gibt es keine Shelter für den Busbereich. Es gibt ein großes Dach und mehr nicht.
Bitte ändern.
vg
Mapward (2019-05-12 13:16:12+00:00): Ja, weiß ich, ich habe das Dach entsprechen als ein Shelter gewertet
ma-rt-in (2019-05-12 13:27:36+00:00): Ist es aber eigentlich nicht, sondern ein covered
BAGgeraar (2021-07-19 17:20:40+00:00): Is het een bewuste keuze dat de ondersteuningen van de Haringvlietbrug niet zijn uitgelijnd met de BGT?
AdVerburg (2021-07-20 09:06:13+00:00): Vermoedelijk de ENC laag gebruikt om de obstakels in vaarweg over te nemen.
Die (overheids)bronnen verschillen best wel een paar meter onderling.
ma-rt-in (2019-05-12 13:48:40+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du an der L91 die lanes:for-/backward entfernt?
Way 689451490 führt mit lanes=2 was nicht stimmen kann. Des Weiteren fällt mir auf das du bei Way 175659517 das oneway entfernst, was auch nicht nötig war. 

vg
Uwenr5 (2019-05-12 15:53:17+00:00): hallo martin
lanes:forward backward bei 2 spuren ist sinnlos da es keine einbahnstraße ist und folglich eine spur für hin und eine für rück ist. bringt nur was wenn mehr spuren vorhanden sind und der renderer dann wissen muß welche spuren für welche richtung sind. way 689451490: ist mir wohl ein fehler unterlaufen werd ich berichtigen. bei dem letzten: stand da oneway=no? dann ist das auch unnötig da standard.
uwe
ma-rt-in (2019-05-12 17:32:12+00:00): ein lanes:for-/backward ist überhaupt nicht sinnlos. Es mag sein das du dir vllt denken kannst, das eine Spur vor und die andere zurück geht, eine Maschine kann das nicht so einfach. Nun kommt noch das oneway ins Spiel. Woher soll die Maschine wissen ob es je 1 Spur vor und zurück geht, oder 2 in die selbe Richtung. 
Die Angabe von solchen Werten haben durchaus ihre Berechtigung. und ein löschen mindert die Datenqualität.
vg
Uwenr5 (2019-05-12 17:51:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:lanes
weiter unten steht bei annahme:
"Wenn nur die Gesamtanzahl an Fahrstreifen einer Gegenverkehrsstraße angegeben ist und diese gerade ist, wird davon ausgegangen, dass sich die Fahrstreifen gleichmäßig auf beide Fahrtrichtungen verteilen." 
dann bei den annahmen im kasten:
bei 2 spuren gegenverkehr (also hin und rück): "Falls die tatsächliche Anzahl an Fahrstreifen identisch zu dieser Annahme ist, wird diese Anzahl gewöhnlicherweise nicht eingetragen." 
also kurzum, braucht nicht angegeben zu werden!
zu oneway:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:oneway
"oneway=no oder Tag fehlt: Straße kann in beiden Richtungen befahren werden."
und weiter:
"Die Zuordung oneway=no trifft für die Mehrzahl der Straßen zu und wird für kleine Straßen nicht angegeben. Anders sieht es bei Autobahnen highway=motorway u.ä. aus. Die Angabe schließt ein Abbiegen in die falsche Ausfahrt bei der Routenberechnung aus. "
natürlich kann ich alles rein machen aber viele daten bedeuten auch viele fehler und deshalb auf das nötigste beschränken.
ma-rt-in (2019-05-12 18:06:16+00:00): Ok, da kann ich dem Wiki nicht direkt etwas entgegnen, jedoch kann es nicht sein, das sich der Mapper, in dem Fall teilweise ich, mir die Mühe mache die Daten zu erfassen und dann kommt ein anderer, in dem Fall du, und löscht diese Daten. Auch wenn es nicht zwingend erforderlich ist, dies einzutragen, stört es mich, das du meine Arbeit löschst. 
Die Aussage " viele Daten = viele Fehler" kann ich so nicht akzeptieren; Nach diesem Grundsatz dürfte man gar nichts mehr erfassen. Ich arbeite in bestimmten Bereich sehr detailhaft und, wie bereits geschrieben, nervt es wenn meine Arbeit zu nichte gemacht wird.
vg
Uwenr5 (2019-05-12 18:20:23+00:00): ok sorry für das löschen
mit viel arbeit viele fehler wollte ich auf keinen fall deine arbeit schlecht machen!!!!!
nur die warscheinlichkeit das mehr fehler gemacht werden sollte damit zum ausdruck kommen. (wer nix schaft macht auch keine fehler ;-)))
darf ich mal fragen wo du herkommst?
ma-rt-in (2019-05-12 18:21:32+00:00): Danke für dein Verständnis.
Bzgl deiner Frage: Siehe gleich mal in deine Nachrichten.
Dimacn (2019-05-12 16:33:43+00:00): Вы ошибочно удалили со здания тег 
building превратив его в парк отдыха. Пожалуйста исправьте назад.
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 12:27:49+00:00): Does your house look this way? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Cepkeliu_marsh.jpg because this is what natural=wetland means in the OSM database https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland and this is why people are reverting your edits. You are following your own rules rather than OSM ones.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 12:52:43+00:00): Yes on rain days and 4 days after a rain day, and I can't cut my grass for 3 weeks because of the constant rain.   half of dundalk is that way....   

There is also more than one type of wetlands, when you google wetlands by definition.     By definition of a wetlands, all of the waterfront property in Maryland is entitled to a salt marsh wetlands tag because it really is....
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 12:55:53+00:00): I am not creating my own rules...    Every tag i have done on the property is legit, just some are differences of opinions.    Just because I enjoy a nice quality of life, Should mean I can't update it in OSM to reflect actual conditions.    Which is all I am doing.     I should be allowed to properly tag my area.  If you guys stop looking at it as me doing just one property, and let me finish everything...    You might understand the area....
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 13:03:22+00:00): Yes you are creating your own rules, what "wetland" means in a dictionary (or anywhere else) is irrelevant here, and you are definitely not properly tagging anything here (let apart the trees maybe).
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 13:05:28+00:00): I'm happy you enjoy a nice quality of life despite being under meters of water btw :)
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 13:06:54+00:00): And don't forget you own your house, but you don't own his representation on a geographical database, which is quite a different thing.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-12 11:44:10+00:00): As I've said in messages too numerous to mention, you need to ask yourself "how would other people in OSM map this".  I don't think that they'd map your property as primarily a wetland.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 11:48:53+00:00): And it doesn't matter what others would do.   It is what the land is actually entitled....    And what it actually is...    

This argument, is the same as the school argument.    I caved in that, because you guys said it was an actual school grounds.   How is this any different, except, I have millions of webpages to prove it is correct.     Because it is waterfront property in Maryland.  All maryland waterfront property is considered wetlands.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-12 12:06:26+00:00): The whole point of OSM is that it's a shared project - it actually DOES matter what others would do.  
It doesn't matter what your local government thinks; that's completely separate to what is an appropriate OSM tag for something.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 12:07:56+00:00): Wait.  If it doesn't matter what the local government thinks, then why is school grounds so important?
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 12:09:32+00:00): If it doesn't matter what local government thinks, than what I do to my area shouldn't matter.   As everything I am doing is legit and has documentation for it.   Hence the wiki links to provide the classifications.    It is not like I am making the shit up as I go.   I have done my research.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 12:10:57+00:00): The park should be considered Grass and Wetlands too......    Because it is...
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 12:19:00+00:00): "As I've said in messages too numerous to mention, you need to ask yourself "how would other people in OSM map this". I don't think that they'd map your property as primarily a wetland."

That is an assumption based on your opinion.   It isn't backed by facts.   It is your opinion.    My opinion on everything has been based on facts...   With documentation to prove it.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 12:26:14+00:00): How do we comprise?    I am adding everything that should be on the property.   Am I not placing stuff how others would do it?  Tagging the land for wetlands and grass, should be allowed.     am I supposed to map differently?   What is the real issue?
TravGW (2019-05-12 13:01:40+00:00): Prove to us that it is a real wetland. Show us where is says your house is a wetland. If your backyard does not look like the Florida Everglades, then it is not a wetland. The burden of proof is on you, not us. Link to what your source is. Prove that it is a wetland, don't just make wild claims. Oh and here what Baltimore County lists a wetland and it is not your house. https://i.imgur.com/FrdVSWM.png

https://bc-gis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html
SomeoneElse (2019-05-12 13:28:48+00:00): > Am I not placing stuff how others would do it?

Clearly not, as shown by the fact that (many) others are complaining about it.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 15:06:34+00:00): Add me on Facebook.  I just took pictures of the wetland yard.  Chris radtke
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 18:51:38+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/V8wytJU


Clearly proof.   RC-20 is defined as Wetlands and Forrest reserve areas.  They are also considered park areas.   Straight from the Zoning map.    

I have been fighting it personally for 3 years......    I think I would know all to well.    I am currently in to 2 lawsuits with it.    One was over the patio that is used for my PTSD.  I am a veteran.    legally disabled by the VA.    I know my area well sir.
PT-53 (2019-05-12 12:03:18+00:00): Hallo VeesFa,
bitte gib korrekte Änderungssatz-Kommentare und auch jeweils die richtige Quelle an.
Grüße
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-05-13 01:10:57+00:00): Reverted as unverified: see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70173902#map=17/14.85074/120.82374
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-05-13 01:11:15+00:00): Reverted as unverified: see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70173902#map=17/14.85074/120.82374
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 12:30:29+00:00): Natural=water does not mean "flood plain", it means your house is currently flooded https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 12:56:38+00:00): it is...
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 13:08:51+00:00): Like this object? it has the same natural=water tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6403751
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 17:53:36+00:00): Yes.  All throughout dundalk....   Almost every park on the water...   Should be eligible for a wetlands.    You can check out all of them.    There is wetlands everywhere around the water.     Turners, fleming park, Peach Orchard Park, merritt park, chesterwood, inverness, Lynch cover is a managed forrest.  All of edgemere and miller's island technically.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 17:53:52+00:00): Glen Burnie area, annapolis, etc...
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 17:56:40+00:00): Lots of areas that should be classified as wetlands...  we need proof for the whole area of the chesapeake bay?     It is quite obvious, I am telling the truth.     Seach "the Chesapeake bay".    It should be enough evidence, when i am talking about a massive area not marked correctly....    It all should be wetlands....    When you think about it.    Go to a park on the water....     You will see plenty areas of wetlands all throughout the area...
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 18:02:10+00:00): Yes, I know my area, I do play pokemon and ingress.   I can confirm I am not lying about the areas.
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 18:31:58+00:00): That's complete nonsense. You're clearly just interested in cheating for the games you play and nothing else. Go on if you prefer, enjoy you stilt house, but don't be surprised if your edits are reverted or your account is blocked.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 18:53:02+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/V8wytJU

I would know all to well.    I spent 3 years in a court case fighting the state that it is private property for my PTSD and i should be able to build the patio to cope with my PTSD, My property was what gave me life for 2 years.     I visited almost every park in the dundalk area on a daily basis.   I have 2 ongoing cases in Baltimore County courts for property.    Everything I have said is true about the areas.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 19:02:15+00:00): https://www.baltimorecountymd.gov/Agencies/planning/zoning/classifications.html
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 19:02:50+00:00): Rc-20 definition.
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 19:45:59+00:00): I'm sorry for your legal troubles, but it has nothing to do here. As other people already told you, we map what exists on the ground, which is not related to any particular zoning by any administrative entity.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 19:46:04+00:00): https://imgur.com/QzzrXs1
https://imgur.com/n44p0Zm
https://imgur.com/18K8uNS
https://imgur.com/YYn1kdP
https://imgur.com/a/V8wytJU
https://imgur.com/GBEOWnr
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 19:46:29+00:00): https://imgur.com/YY19Pp1
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 19:47:01+00:00): https://imgur.com/4sb9ML2
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 19:53:43+00:00): https://imgur.com/W2brFt3
https://imgur.com/lYvYLp6
https://imgur.com/LYWTla3
https://imgur.com/i6Xmmz1
https://imgur.com/SK3PDUe
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 19:54:23+00:00): It is wetlands.  You can see the water...  It all existings and should be allowed.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 19:55:36+00:00): https://www.chesapeakebay.net/issues/wetlands
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 19:59:07+00:00): People should be aware so they don't assume like me with the properties.    1/2 acre of build able land on the water was deceiving when in reality some of the land is RC-20...     Not being able to do things because of the RC-20 sucks.   It should be a wetland.  It should have everything.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 20:02:45+00:00): Everything is over.   Just saying I know what we are dealing with more than you.    Yes the chesapeake bay area up and down the costal water ways is all labeled RC-20.   Which should make those areas wetlands.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 20:11:41+00:00): It is the correct thing to do.  Is to correct mark the wetlands and parks.  :)    it is all legit backup.
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 20:16:26+00:00): All right, I think I finally understand what you mean. But editing an online map won't help you anyways I believe.
Alecs01 (2019-05-12 20:17:55+00:00): And still, it remains true we don't map the legal status of the ground.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-12 20:22:27+00:00): I know.  But I'm allowed to edit the map correctly.  Because osm allows to have websites linked with the information.  Because I have actual documentation for things in real life.  So I dont see why the constant debate from the same people who just used school zoning maps against me.  I just provided picture of existing.  And documentation of the wetlands by actual informational sites.  Digitally we have a responsibility to update the map with existing conditions that are not shown.     Wetlands, grass, parks, etc.    All as you say is documentation proving it exists.    Since I've built it so many times.  One of you should redo it for this area.  Because it's not wrong.    It's legit.  What else do you need?
szydzio (2019-05-13 07:42:47+00:00): Hej! Geodeta to office=geodesist, patrz =>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:office%3Dgeodesist . Pozdr!
DaveF (2019-05-20 11:39:17+00:00): Hi
What's the purpose of this relation?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9582149

Wiki says the tube line doesn't use platform 5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratford_station#Station_layout
MacLondon (2019-05-20 20:20:31+00:00): I made the relation purely based on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48016379 being named as "Stratford - Central Line - Eastbound - Platform 5".

At the time I was creating a similar multipolygon for the westbound Central Line, as http://osm-subway.maps.me/uk.html highlighted it as a validation error to have 2 platforms (3 and 3a) with role=platform in the westbound Central Line route. I combined these 2 platforms into a multipolygon for that reason.

That's when I noticed 2 platforms named as Eastbound platforms also. and assumed the platform names would be correct.
DaveF (2019-05-20 21:25:11+00:00): It can't be the correct name as the tube line doesn't run past it!.
Even if it were correct there'd be no requirement to collect them into a relation as the name would provide a link.

Station stops can have two platforms, one either side. I think there's a error in the validator. No validator should have it findings taken as gospel.

I fail to see how combining them in a MP helps - They're still two platforms. MP's are meant to be used when mapping can't done with nodes & ways, not just as a reason to collect things together in a nice, neat group.
maraf24 (2019-05-13 14:47:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365298867/history
Tak, w tym miejscu jest teraz poprawadzony pas rowerowy.
maro21 (2019-05-14 14:56:52+00:00): Ale nadal jest tu powierzchnia wyłączona z ruchu.
maraf24 (2019-05-14 20:40:25+00:00): Zmniejszona o pas dla rowerów.
Dimacn (2019-05-12 16:34:33+00:00): В name пишем только официальное название https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Пожалуйста исправьте.
marc__marc (2021-03-12 12:12:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6467977997
it's an embassy ? witch country ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:diplomatic=embassy
Regards,
Marc
marc__marc (2021-03-12 12:13:39+00:00): it also have no name... and in the middle of nowhere... i have no idea what's it is :)
highflyer74 (2019-10-18 17:21:24+00:00): Hallo Georgos20!

Kannst Du Dich noch erinnern, warum Du diesen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531908445 mit access=no getaggt hast, gleichzeitig aber foot=yes und bicycle=yes gesetzt hast?

Das fragen wir uns gerade hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1964127

Vielleicht kannst Du uns weiterhelfen.
Family City Center Apartment (2019-05-12 13:08:36+00:00): Please, this street have name 
Fra Filipa Grabovca

my msitake, sorry
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:45:23+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:45:25+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-20 03:38:07+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید. این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست هم توضیح مناسب نمینویسید.

از الان شما تا ساعت ۶صبح روز ۱ خرداد ۹۸ فرصت دارید تا به نظرات کابران بر روی چنجست‌های خودتون پاسخ بدید در غیر این صورت شما گزارش خواهید شد.

سوشا
از OSM Iran
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:45:28+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
Dimacn (2019-05-12 16:39:53+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте чушь на карту. Ваши правки будут отменены до изначального состояния.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-17 23:07:41+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید «ماکسیم». در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-05-17 23:07:43+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید «ماکسیم». در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-05-17 23:07:45+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید «ماکسیم». در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-12 15:44:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70163821 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al