piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
daperson (2022-12-16 01:59:56+00:00): No quiero discutir esto; tienes interes en revertir mis cambios por no usar imagenes?
ovruni (2022-12-16 02:05:30+00:00): Tus cambios consisten entre algunas cosas el alinear algunos edificios, y mencionas que no usas ninguna imagen, entonces no parece tener sentido el ajustar estructuras sin ninguna imagen.
Saludos
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-16 01:46:45+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=40.668287%2C-111.893059%2C16.99
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130135687
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 08:26:48+00:00): Reverted removal of top-level tag and fixed ALL CAPS names for SEO spam POIs in changeset 183580301

https://osm.org/changeset/183580301
tastrax (2023-02-03 05:30:53+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-03 08:26:33+00:00): Revert removal of top-level tag and fix ALL CAPS names for SEO spam POIs in changeset 183580301

https://osm.org/changeset/183580301
Supaplex (2022-12-16 02:19:49+00:00): 如果整棟建築確實是 7-Eleven，不用再額外再加點
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130135936
Frans S (2023-01-19 13:24:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130136355
user_5359 (2022-12-21 07:23:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/544204255. What is the meaning of the tag FR = 524?
Kovirii (2023-06-03 10:51:16+00:00): Forest Road 524
felipeeugenio (2022-12-16 12:30:09+00:00): Hola Christopher. Layer es para cuando un elemento está sobre otra cosa, como un puente o un túnel. En un edificio tiene poco sentido. Qué estás intentando expresar? Los pisos? building:levels

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130137332
dhimmel (2022-12-16 03:44:00+00:00): forgot to link source https://www.strava.com/activities/8242653269
user_5359 (2025-10-20 07:01:56+00:00): Hello! What is the mean of the tags
MAPA=0.0
MAPA1=0.0
fid=0.0
fid1=0.0
?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-12-18 20:37:19+00:00): Looks like the toilet building at the northern entrance got buried under the pedestrian area.
mikaeldui (2022-12-18 22:10:50+00:00): @qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq yeah, seems some buildings ended up under the pedestrian areas. I'll go ahead and merge them.
nevw (2023-07-15 01:10:51+00:00): Hi
the circular part is included in the Pinnacles National Park and has been updated by the Protected areas of Queensland - boundaries - 2023.
nevw (2023-07-15 01:22:13+00:00): https://wetlandinfo.des.qld.gov.au/wetlands/facts-maps/national-park-pinnacles/
Joseph Crowell (2023-07-16 03:12:17+00:00): Ah, this needs to be reverted then.
Joseph Crowell (2023-07-16 03:29:45+00:00): I've pushed through a revert.
nevw (2023-07-16 04:13:53+00:00): Oh, i had already fixed…should have been more clear. I’ll update to the latest dataset later then. Cheers
SekeRob (2022-12-16 19:50:44+00:00): Ciao,

Si prega di ricontrollare la correttezza del tag di senso unico su Via Curtolini. Le immagini aeree dell'ESRI mostrano un punto di sosta nella direzione opposta all'incrocio con Via Fogazzaro

Aspettando la tua risposta

Ciao
SekeRob (2022-12-17 09:25:16+00:00): OK i Stop e eredità con la pista ciclabile ridipinta. Anche I stradqa e maxspeed=30

bon mappatura
MxxCon (2022-12-16 05:33:45+00:00): Might consider using "Mo-Fr 17:00-02:00" instead of 26.
Also add similar value to fee:conditional=
ezekielf (2022-12-17 02:58:29+00:00): Yeah that would be fine.  The opening hours syntax offers several different options for closing after midnight.  I chose the first.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Closing_after_midnight

I thought about adding fee:conditional, but that would seem to imply that there is no fee some of the time.  Although a permit holder doesn't have to pay a fee each time they park, they do have to pay a monthly or yearly fee for the permit.  So there is always a fee of some kind.
ovruni (2022-12-16 05:50:19+00:00): Hola GILMER QUEQUE, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado como edificios varias zonas donde no parecen haber edificios, por otra parte, este parece ser un patron similar en esta zona, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios.
Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
cartofy (2022-12-16 09:14:05+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you've added a waterway, which does not exist and has created multiple tags that don't exist. 

Since OSM is used by many different users for critical use cases such as routing and map tiles, it is important that you only add information you know is to be true and is valid. Please go through https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ if you have not already.

Your changeset comment "dm&g sa" also does not provide any information about what you are actually editing. Please go through good practice guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments
cartofy (2022-12-16 09:14:25+00:00): Kindly remove this bad edit at the earliest, else if you are not sure - happy to do it for you.
marczoutendijk (2022-12-18 19:13:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6675

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
ovruni (2022-12-16 05:56:06+00:00): Hola GILMER QUEQUE, en sus conjuntos de cambios se estan agregando areas de lotes, pero se estan agregando vias con etiquetas de edficios. Por favor revise la documentación sobre edificios. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:building
Saludos
ovruni (2022-12-16 05:57:34+00:00): Hola GILMER QUEQUE, nuevamente en sus conjuntos de cambios se estan agregando varias vias sobre areas que no son edificios, lo cual ademas sugiere el uso de un copiar y pegar, por lo que he revertido sus conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-12-19 12:03:01+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة اماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة إلى الخريطة
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-12-19 02:17:57+00:00): 您好，看起来您的编辑并没有太多错误，但您的变更集注释毫无意义，不能表现出您所编辑的内容，可否改用更有意义的changeset comment

可见
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2022-12-17 04:57:18+00:00): Hi, 

歡迎來到 OpenStreetMap 專案，為開源的自由貢獻運用的地圖專案。

由於 OpenStreetMap 為即時的地理資料庫，不少大型網站如 Facebook、Niantic、Apple 都有使用，因此測試性質編輯請用測試站
https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
謝謝！
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130140637
ovruni (2022-12-16 06:33:27+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se menciona "Parque" y se ha desplazado sin motivo una manzana para conectarla con el área residencial, he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
ivanbranco (2022-12-17 09:29:10+00:00): Hi Discostu36,

the proper syntax for wikimedia commons values is =File:xyz.jpg, not =Datei:xyz.jpg, I fixed it

good mapping :)
Discostu36 (2022-12-17 12:43:04+00:00): I know, just an oversight, thanks for fixing
Basstoelpel (2023-01-11 17:51:41+00:00): Hallo geozeisig, 

das ist meines Wissens kein Windpark sondern eine Ansammlung von einzelnen Windrädern individueller Betreiber. Eins davon gehört jedenfalls meiner Tante, ich weiß aber nicht welches.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
geozeisig (2023-01-13 07:16:40+00:00): Aus meiner Quelle geht der Name für eine Ansammlung von Windrädern hervor, meist der vom nahegelegenen Ort. Und die Leistung, die die Summe der einzelnen Windräder ist. Ober den operator wird nichts gesagt, auch nicht, ob es mehrere sind. Ich sehe da eigentlich keinen großen Widerspruch.

Gruß Dieter
Oskarst_ (2025-01-23 11:41:23+00:00): Hei,

Ser ut til at du med dette kalte en relation som strekker seg helt til Møllendal for Tveiterås. Har du mulighet til å ordne opp i dette? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4824122/history#map=15/60.36446/5.37161
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-12-16 23:22:20+00:00): Hallo geozeisig,
Wikipedia ist leider keine zulässige Quelle für Openstreetmap. Aufgrund der Lizenz dürfen keine Daten aus Wikipedia übernommen werden.
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
eggie (2022-12-16 08:03:10+00:00): Henk goed bezig..
Je plein heb ik omgezet naar highway= pedestrian met area=yes

De tag square is meer bedoeld voor het Rode Plein in Moskou e.d. 
Groet eggie
eggie (2022-12-16 08:09:16+00:00): Henk,
De woonerven heb ik omgezet naar highway=service service=alley  
Alelen living_street gebruiken bij een bord woonerf.

Je kunt hier niet doorrijden . Er zit een stukje trottoir tussen. Dat heb ik op footway gezet.
Kijk steeds naar de bebording.
Sinds wanneer staat hier een bord woonerf?
Laat het even weten, dan draai ik mijn wijziging terug.
MVG
eggie
Henkje20 (2022-12-17 11:20:58+00:00): Oké bedankt !
ma-rt-in (2023-06-18 09:57:12+00:00): Hallo,

weist du wann die Baustele vorbei ist?

vg
kapazao (2024-02-06 12:12:02+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías revisar el etiquetado de las vías en construcción?
No puede existir un etiquetado de vía operativa y otro de que está en construcción, ya que no sabemos entonces cuál es el correcto.
Debería corregirse o eliminarse el etiquetado de construcción si ya está finalizada.
Un saludo
jacksparrow (2024-02-07 16:54:12+00:00): Buenas, supongo que alguien que no era yo crearía algún etiquetado duplicando el mío en vez de haberlo editado. mañana por la mañana miro todo al dedillo y elimino lo que no sea correcto.
kapazao (2024-02-08 13:01:42+00:00): Estuve revisando el histórico de algunos elementos y por ejemplo en este (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121544919/history) en la versión 9 se ve que cambiaste highway=construction a residential, sin eliminar la etiqueta construction=residential, por eso te lo comentaba.
Si lo puedes revisar te lo agradezco, yo ya estoy haciéndolo en otros sitios donde puedo.
Un saludo
wkdgs (2023-01-05 09:08:41+00:00): Hi,

könntest du noch ein "construction=tertiary" hinzufügen, damit die Information, was für eine Straße es ist, erhalten bleibt?

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130143998
SekeRob (2022-12-16 08:25:56+00:00): PS It's likely some island car/all will show up in OSMI as clearly some of what's tagged as path is actually track for vehicle movement. Will await tomorrow's report.
VLD515 (2023-01-17 09:45:28+00:00): According to convention on Indonesian terms, the correct writing of the name should be Danau Pascatambang TAL. 
Menurut tata bahasa Indonesia, penulisan yang benar seharusnya Pascatambang. 
The name will be updated for more grammatically correct name in the map.
Marek-M (2022-12-16 09:22:17+00:00): Cześć, trochę poprawiłem Twoją edycję z przeprawą promową, bo wyszedł Ci pomost przez prawie całe jezioro. Oczywiście moją edycję można dopracować :) Pozdrawiam.

Moja edycja: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130146691
Warin61 (2023-04-05 23:56:21+00:00): Hi,
I have tagged this as access=private as it goes through private property. A new mapper deleted it because it goes through private property... So ... is it public or private?
GreplusLy5525Buenavista (2023-04-06 01:08:07+00:00): Its my land, so I can confirm its private property. I don't want any track marked because trail apps just have the track marked, but don't list it as public/ private. I have had many walkers trespass on my property because of this trail marker. Can this please stay deleted.
Warin61 (2023-04-06 08:40:48+00:00): Sorry. This has come up many times before - including private roads that people use as a short cut.. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
Warin61 (2023-04-06 08:58:05+00:00): Thinking about this more.. On your property put up 'Private Property' signs. And then remove traces of the path. Once that is done you could separate your section of the path and mark it abandoned:highway=path. Don't re-tag it until you have removed those path traces or you'll have people re-entering it. If you want to keep the path then your out of luck.
boroli (2023-04-22 19:50:01+00:00): Can you please clarify which part of the walking track is private? As the lower part near the creek seems to be in the Wilson Glen Park, and as such public. Also the track ends at a public car park next to the road.
And when I was walking it, there were even old trail marks along the track. Thus, I thought it's a public track.
Warin61 (2023-04-23 07:43:31+00:00): I would think the property boundaries of the DCS Base Map (Six Maps for nonOSM use) would be reasonably definitive. However it is not clear to me who would be 'responsible' for land between the park and those street properties. Possibly local council. I would be reluctant to tag most of it as 'public' as that leads to people assuming they can walk through the 'little bit at the end' (the true private bit) when they should not. 
However I await  GreplusLy5525Buenavista response as it could be more detailed.
GreplusLy5525Buenavista (2023-04-23 21:42:41+00:00): The Buena vista exit/entry is on my land, hence people can’t exit/enter without walking on my land. There is no public car park at the end of the track, just a small turning bay marked ‘no parking’ as the dead end road is quite narrow. Local council have recently been working in the area doing bush regeneration and have advised they will be erecting ‘private property’ signs as this track passes through a number of locals properties.
Warin61 (2023-04-24 07:18:07+00:00): Between No 25 and 19 there looks to be access to nos 26 to 31, these may never be built? In imagery there is a start of a road between 19 and 25 .. This could be public. 
The path as mapped intrudes on to both 19 and 25, possibly the path could be changed to not intrude?  @ boroli thoughts?
boroli (2023-04-24 11:27:02+00:00): This is what  GreplusLy5525Buenavista said is a small turning bay, while I thought it's a car park. Nevertheless, in both cases it's public bitumen until the cliff.
I don't know who owns the land in parallel west of the cliff. If this is public, then yes potentially the track could be realigned.
On the other hand, if there's a strip of private land going all the way parallel to the cliff, there's no option to do so. This needs to be clarified.
GreplusLy5525Buenavista (2023-04-24 11:52:32+00:00): I own the land on the up to the cliff on the southern side, and perpendicular west. So unless people scale the cliff they will be walking on my land. I have had numerous walkers from the track on my land in recent months, even had some people in my backyard when they thought they could continue along an unmarked trail - which is essentially my garden path. Where the track leads under the cliff there is a waterfall and recent bush regeneration. Prior to this the cliff is quite high, which is why people have continued on to my land. The public land is only a thin strip (the road water runoff from the turning bay creates the small waterfall here). I own the bush west and south of Buena vista rd down to approximately where the Wilson’s glen track is, and I understand neighbouring blocks hold a similar land title. So this track does go through a number of private properties. I would very much like this track to be deleted, as it remains marked on walking trail apps. Prior to this track being added on here it was only locals knowledge and we liked it not being public knowledge, because we don’t like people trespassing.
UseroftheWikis (2022-12-16 10:16:11+00:00): Hello, I have removed the description of the salon because it is advertising and subjective. Please do not create descriptions that are advertising and/or subjective.
bergaufsee (2023-01-22 15:05:38+00:00): Hallo,
"kein Fahrrad bei Hauszugängen" ist faktisch nicht richtig, man kann und darf mit dem Fahrrad vom/zum Hauseingang gelangen, bicycle=no unterbindet dies jedoch. Auch ist vor Ort keinerlei Beschilderung diesbezüglich vorhanden. bicycle=no ist nicht zur Kennzeichung der Radfahrereignung gedacht/geeignet sondern lediglich für Orte an denen das Radfahren explizit untersagt ist.
Ein nicht vorhandenes bicycle=no oder gar ein bicycle=yes bedeuten ja letztlich auch nicht dass keine Rücksicht auf andere Verkehrsteilnehmer genommen werden muss. Selbst z.B. bei explizit ausgeschilderten Gehwegen mit Fahrradfreigabe hat der Fußgänger Vorrang und der Radfahrer darf sich nur mit max. Schrittgeschwindigkeit bewegen.
Ich werde diese Einträge daher wieder entfernen.
UseroftheWikis (2022-12-16 10:11:01+00:00): Hello, I have removed the description of the salon because it is advertising and subjective. Please do not create descriptions that are advertising and/or subjective.
eggie (2022-12-16 09:38:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-16 09:42:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Deze key wordt niet veel gebruikt op reguliere wegen. Meestal wordt de breedte van de weg opgegeven. 
width=

Verder geen oneway=no gaan zetten op reguliere wegen.. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:narrow

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Devdatta (2022-12-16 10:54:48+00:00): Please enter a Descriptive commit  message for your changeset.

It is not clear why you have one changeset over such a large area
marczoutendijk (2022-12-18 19:13:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6675

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
NorthCrab (2022-12-16 13:29:09+00:00): Witaj, czyli rozumiem że do tego lokalu nie da się już wejść? (I nie jest to tymczasowe)
NorthCrab (2022-12-16 13:29:47+00:00): Czy to jest wiedza lokalna czy może jest jakaś informacja online? Pozdrawiam!
eggie (2022-12-16 10:36:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  In OSM zetten we de adresnodes op de gebouwen en niet ernaast. 
FRealiseer je dat luchtfoto's vaak schuin zijn genomen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-16 10:39:38+00:00): Adresnodes heb ik teruggeplaatst
gr eggie
eggie (2022-12-16 09:45:38+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Probeer jet gebied va je edits klein te houden.
Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus geeft vaak schade. 
Je hoeft geen oneway=no toe te voegen aan wegen.. behalve als je bang bent dat een andere mapper oneway=yes gaat toevoegen zoals aan een tweerichtingfietsrotonde. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-16 09:49:22+00:00): Nog een dingetje...  Er is kennelijk een nieuwe fietsverbinding gekomen. Je kun helaas geen fietsrouterelaties aanpassen met een simpele editor als iD. De routerelatie gaat dan stuk. Ik zal even kijke of het simpel is op te lossen. 
Het kan wel met editor josm.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-16 10:06:54+00:00): De routerelaties heb ik hersteld.
Wat is de status van dat oude G13 fietspad nu...  Je hebt nu alleen acccess=no toegevoegd, maar de cyclewaytags staan er nog op?

MVG
eggie
Jan927 (2022-12-16 10:13:39+00:00): Allereerst bedankt voor de snelle en heldere opmerkingen, hier leer ik ook direct van! 
Het oude fietspad (incl. de spoorwegovergang) is nog niet verwijderd (wordt waarschijnlijk ergens in het voorjaar-2023 uitgevoerd), maar is tot die tijd afgesloten met borden.

Wellicht overbodig, maar het fietspad is verlegd om de onbewaakte spoorwegovergang te ruimen. Het nieuwe pad gaat via de brug onder het spoor door (vandaar ook de hoogtebeperking)
eggie (2022-12-16 10:23:27+00:00): Oke....   Ik heb de highway=cycleway even omgetagd naar highway=path

Al die G13 fietspadtags heb ik verwijderd. access=no is voldoende. 

C1 is eigenlijk
vehicle=no
horse=no
Maar ik heb nu access=no laten staan, want ik neem aan dat het voor wandelaars ook niet meer is toegestaan. 

De regel proposed=cycleway  (Dat is de specificatie kan er nog af)
Die zie ik nu nog staan. Doe je dat zelf? 
De note kan daarna op Groen.
Ik had de voorgaande mapper EdeWit nog even ingeseind. Zie note.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2304304#map=16/53.1746/5.6020&layers=N

Bedankt voor je reactie..
eggie
eggie (2022-12-16 10:30:22+00:00): Rijstebrij in het begin...  

Tagging voor een G13 fietspad
----
moped=no,
mofa=no 
traffic_sign=NL:G13 

motor_vehicle=no hoort ook niet op een G13 fietspad
eggie (2022-12-16 11:54:15+00:00): motor_vehicle=no , cycleway=proposed en en access=no verwijderd van het nieuwe traject. ..
G13 tagging aangepast.
eggie (2022-12-17 08:01:02+00:00): De finishing touch is door lokale mapper  E de Wit gedaan. Tagging klopt nu. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-12-16 09:51:29+00:00): Beste Jan... Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.  Je kunt zoiets beter in meerdere uploads doen.

Je hebt nu 	Westerein 3 heel ergens anders heen verplaatst
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130146531

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-16 09:55:05+00:00): Adresnode 3 teruggezet
eggie (2022-12-16 10:17:22+00:00): Ik heb
van het fietspad een highway=path gemaakt.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-12-16 09:53:52+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Je zult dus zaken moeten opzoeken in de wiki. Vooral in het begin.
Een historic=monument is een graftombe vergelijkbaar met bv de TajMahal..  Is dat hier het geval?

Of is het wellicht een historic=memorial  Iets wat wij een monument noemen.
Het Engelse 'monument'  is niet hetzelfde als ons monument.
Eggie
eggie (2022-12-16 12:10:06+00:00): monument omgezet naar 'artwork' met type windvaan. 
Dat lijkt me meer

ele (is hoogte boven NAP) omgezet naar hoogte van het kunstwerk zelf..

Gr eggie
NorthCrab (2022-12-16 10:32:13+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikacje zmian.

Czy tutaj nadal są 2 pasy do zjazdu z ronda: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980550497 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980873328 Czy to rondo ma 2 pasy? Bo dziwi mnie to że zarz po zjeździe z ronda odrazu następuje zwężenie do 1, np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1108361486/history. Więc gdzieś tutaj jest błąd.
Grzegorz Tlołka (2022-12-16 10:35:54+00:00): Szerokość ronda sugeruje dwa pasy - w czasie otwarcia częściowego, na obu połówkach w ciągu ulicy Halickiej pojazdy poruszały się jak po dwu pasach, w przeciwległych kierunkach. Na razie jeszcze brak oznakowania poziomego, które pojawi się po zakończeniu prac z prostopadłą "11 listopada"
NorthCrab (2022-12-16 11:07:39+00:00): 👍️
Davileci (2023-05-21 23:18:57+00:00): The tag `parking:lane:both` is deprecated in favour of `parking:both`.
mueschel (2025-10-24 10:29:02+00:00): Hallo,
bitte schaue mal nach den Ladestationen die du eingetragen hast. "socket:ccs" ist kein gültiger Steckertyp, siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket
guerda (2025-10-26 09:37:01+00:00): Hallo mueschel,
danke für den Hinweis, werde ich korrigieren.
AndersAndersson (2022-12-17 00:35:22+00:00): Hello
Was this a misstake to name the unclassified road to Inlandsvägen?
aleksaJov (2022-12-19 07:33:19+00:00): Hello  AndersAndersson,

The name Inlandsvägen was removed from trunk road which is already named with the key reg_name.

Regards,
Aleksandar