piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tordans (2022-11-25 07:37:35+00:00): PS: Für mich selbst zur Kontrolle noch ein paar Links:
- Ecke Karl-Liebknecht-Straße Richtung Rudolf-Breitscheid-Straße ist noch Zone 30  https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=18.39416462361948&lat=52.3691967&lng=13.605613199999993&panos=true&pKey=659739232055752&focus=photo&x=0.23564826627783697&y=0.4935300789964653&zoom=0 
- Hinter der Apotheke wechselt es dann mitten im Straßensegment auf "keine Zone" https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=52.3701498&lng=13.6078592&panos=true&pKey=3178915695724263&focus=photo&x=0.1077064084083415&y=0.44918957932101355&zoom=0
- Ecke Heinrich-Heine-Alle Richtung Schulzendorfer Straße hat kein Zonen Schild https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=52.3718106&lng=13.614359699972&panos=true&pKey=3119773754971342&focus=photo&x=0.5357698682377781&y=0.6644026889789804&zoom=0
- Kreuzung Fontanealle / Stadionstarße hat keine Zonen Schilder https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=52.3674632&lng=13.612906199972&panos=true&pKey=261178502781104&focus=photo&x=0.9314584808209849&y=0.5525920457525914&zoom=0.08754405706022358
- Kreuzung Fontanealle / Schulzendorfer Straße hatkeine Zonen Schilder https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=16.088213237090972&lat=52.36843388541695&lng=13.611502963094154&panos=true&pKey=290685026207241&focus=map&x=0.5481211023716247&y=0.6448126720455165&zoom=0.08754405706022358
- Eingang Fontanealle hat keine Zonen Schilder https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=52.3739463&lng=13.6073877&panos=true&pKey=897534060903750&focus=photo&x=0.5352295603835141&y=0.6717769643413594&zoom=0.08754405706022358
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:48:14+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129320867
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:48:32+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129320886
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:48:52+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129320853
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:46:47+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129320853
ZeLonewolf (2022-11-24 03:53:36+00:00): Where was this import documented/discussed?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-24 09:51:24+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129300276 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129300278 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129300281 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129300284 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129300289 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129300314 for some of other parts of this import
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:47:37+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129320860
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-24 13:46:08+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129320866
SimonPoole (2022-11-23 23:53:12+00:00): Hi you seem to be deleting lots of buildings and then replacing them with new ones. Even if you were the original contributor that would seem like a bad idea as in general we want to retain the history of objects.
Pan (2022-11-24 01:30:28+00:00): OK. Point noted. In general, it is easier to redraw them from scratch, but I will try to modify them instead when possible.
SimonPoole (2022-11-24 07:54:55+00:00): I know that is painful:-/
Pan (2022-11-24 08:39:17+00:00): You can check that the other buildings have now been redrawn as modifications of the previous objects. I understand the usefulness but, as you say, i'ts a pain. Thanks again for pointing out that and thank you for your work for OSM in Switzerland.
habi (2023-06-11 20:40:23+00:00): @Pan JOSM has an - in my opinion very nice - 'replace geometry' function: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_geometry_(Ctrl+Shift+G)

I use it a lot when modifying/improving buildings from MOPUBE, the building polygons in the Canton of Bern.
Pan (2023-06-12 09:39:35+00:00): Danke. Ich werde probieren, das Tool zu brauchen.
Osmwithspace (2023-01-07 13:58:36+00:00): Hallo,
der Name ist wahrscheinlich nicht wirklich "Turnhalle", oder?
Grüße Osmwithspace
user_12500175 (2023-01-07 14:04:38+00:00): Hallo,
glaub ich auch nicht, habs mal in die Beschreibung verschoben.

Gutes Neues wünscht
Danfost
ChizuKatsu (2022-11-24 00:20:42+00:00): Fixed the following changeset issues
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129176656
kurisubrooks (2022-11-24 02:35:57+00:00): Hi Warin,
Thank you so much for this changeset! I was going to get to figuring out the platform relations but you saved me from that hassle. You know they're a bit of a struggle for me so I really appreciate it.
Have a fantastic day!
Warin61 (2022-11-24 08:55:10+00:00): Have to wait and see if I got it right ... probably more work to do here...
kurisubrooks (2022-11-24 09:09:25+00:00): Platforms 1-12 never needed relations, and the stairways that were why the relations existed were just recently permanently closed, so they could probably be removed altogether.

16-23 have stairwells that are still in use, but they could be remapped as separate platforms split down the middle so the relations would no longer be needed. 

I can take a look at doing that some other time. I just remapped nearly the entire station already over the past 2 days so I'm a bit tired of this now lol.
Frans S (2022-12-18 11:49:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please use the correct Imagery:  Maxar !!
Buildings should be tagged as building=yes. Not as area=yes !
Best regards
tomhukins (2022-12-21 10:39:32+00:00): Although there's a K6 phone box here, I believe it's not used for that purpose any more, so I wonder if amenity=telephone still makes sense.
christian_plus1 (2022-11-24 09:19:59+00:00): Hallo Peter,

das Betriebsgebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116106217), hatte ich schon richtig gemappt. :)
Die Bing Aufnahmen sind veraltet und noch während des Umbaus (ca. 2019/2020).
Die derzeit aktuellsten Aufnahmen hier sind meiner Ansicht nach die "Maxar Premium Imagery".

Ich werde das Gebäude gleich wieder zurückschieben, nur dass es nicht zu Irritationen kommt.

Beste Grüße
Christian
Map-Peter (2022-11-24 20:22:02+00:00): Hallo Christian,
 
OK, wie eben auch schon per PN zum selben Thema geschrieben.
 
Gruß Peter
Warin61 (2022-11-26 22:32:21+00:00): And another one 

relation 14929799

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129312998 ...
End0fLine (2022-11-24 05:13:48+00:00): I apologize for not making this note initially,  but I added the trails at this state park using a combination of the Strava heat map and my experience walking the trails here
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-24 02:59:43+00:00): Only railways that have been long replaced by buildings, roads and parking lots were removed.  segments obscured by foliage were left.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2022-11-25 14:39:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет названия улиц. Для названий улиц в OpenStreetMap есть специальное соглашение.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
phidauex (2022-12-02 18:36:29+00:00): Hi Joe, can you explain what you were hoping to accomplish with this edit? You have designated every path on campus as bridge, and applied an incorrect name. This damages routing and map data accuracy. This edit will need to be reverted, but if you can let explain the intent I may be able to direct you to the right resources to learn about correct OSM map data tagging and editing. Thanks - Sam
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129305114
phidauex (2022-12-02 19:03:13+00:00): Reverted in changeset id 129654976.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
abakus_uploader (2022-11-24 23:32:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-24 06:08:40+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=41.923260%2C-84.895500%2C17.62
skyper (2022-12-08 17:45:38+00:00): Hallo ramyazka,
wie passen dieses Änderungen zum Kommentar von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363038?
Bitte schau Dir jeweils die Objekthistorie vor solchen Änderungen an.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
ramyazka (2022-12-09 09:47:42+00:00): Hi skyper, Apologise for the incorrect edit I have made the changes and we are working with our internal team to understand more on such scenarios.Thanks again for reporting the issue and giving us the feedback. Always happy to learn more from you
Regards,
ramyazka
skyper (2022-12-11 14:34:10+00:00): Hi ramyazka,
`oneway=no` hat hier doch wunderbar gepasst. Eventuell sollte sogar zusätzlich ein entsprechendes `note=*` gesetzt werden.

Bitte arbeite in Zukunft etwas gründlicher und transparenter. Ein Link zu Deinen Änderungen im Kommentar wäre sehr hilfreich gewesen.

Grüße, skyper
ramyazka (2022-12-12 09:22:33+00:00): Hi skyper,  It was an honest mistake from my end. I'll ensure not to repeat such errors. Thank you for your valuable feedback. Looking forward to learn more.
Regards,
ramyazka
skyper (2022-12-23 14:59:46+00:00): Hallo ramyazka,
leider hast Du zwar geantwortet, aber die Daten nicht geändert.
Das habe ich für Dich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130424587 jetzt nachgeholt.

Weiterhin warte ich auf einen Link zur Beschreibung dieser Aufgabe im OSM-Wiki und auf eine Überprüfung plus gegebenenfalls einer ordentlichen Zurücksetzung aller Deiner fehlerhaften Änderungen dieser Aufgabe. Bis wann kann ich damit rechnen?

Grüße, eines enttäuschten skyper

P.S.: Wenn dies Deine Fähigkeiten überschreitet, kann ja gerne Dein Team zeitnah reagieren.
ramyazka (2022-12-28 03:49:12+00:00): Hi skyper, I had already deleted the directions in changeset 129891519. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and modifying the edit. We are working with our internal team to understand more on such scenarios.Thanks again for reporting the issue and giving us the feedback. Always happy to learn more from you
Regards,
ramyazka
skyper (2023-01-09 19:52:31+00:00): Hello ramyazka,
I wonder if I wrote in Chinese or if you and your advisors do not want to understand. (German is not that complicated but if translation software does not work it might be time for your company to invest in human translators.)

Your revert was incomplete as you did not add `oneway=no`, again.

I see, that you have continued with the task in GB. Have you rechecked with the local community that your changes from this task are appropriate there? Please, provide a link.

One month has past, but I still have no answer if you gonna recheck all your previously made edits (all CSs and not only the ones with comments) and how the timeline looks like. Shouldn't that be the first task before any new changes are made?

Repeating your incomplete answers over and over again does not help and answers from prepared text boxes are really impolite.
In hope of a detailed answer for all my questions and written in own words.

Regards,
skyper
skyper (2023-01-09 19:55:01+00:00): Oh, I forgot. Maybe this discussion among others might be useful:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/einbahnstrassen-falsche-ungeschickte-beschilderung-und-oder-falsches-ungeschicktes-tagging/7334
deepikja (2023-01-13 18:22:59+00:00): Hi Skyper,
Thank you for highlighting the issue and sharing your insights. 
There appears to be a knowledge gap with the editor which resulted in this error, we will educate our team on this and ensure this doesn’t get repeated. 
We've collated your inputs based on the comments you have provided on the changesets and amended our SOP accordingly to avoid future misses.
On the other changesets, I've also implemented the changes you recommended and will continue to validate the remaining edits. 
Please let me know if there are any other changes or revisions that need to be made so that we can correct them asap. 
Appreciate the support 
Regards,
Deepikja
skyper (2023-01-14 14:25:22+00:00): Hi Deepikja,
thanks for the answer.
As I still miss a detailed documentation of the task "Add direction" on the wiki, I am unsure if you got it right and if your instructions are complete. Myself does not have local knowledge of all the places in question and I lack the time to look at hundreds of changes. How about getting the local community involved (e.g. all countries and not only Germany) and announce this task on the forum or mailing-list which should have been done in advance, anyway, and would have solved many issues we face now.
If there is no fully conclusion better revert the changes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Armchair_mapping#Armchair_mapping_guidelines) with a comment including the link to CS with the revert.
Thanks in advance,
regard,
skyper
deepikja (2023-01-17 16:06:41+00:00): Hi Skyper,
We do have a central wiki page where we have a clear description of the work we are doing in OSM, but we do not have a separate wiki page for "added direction" tasks.
We are adding roads, one-way directions, access restrictions based on driver feedback, we have clearly mentioned it in the wiki page. 
However, we are deeply sorry for this instance, our editor confused Wasgaustraße for dual-carriageway and added directions based on driving rule. In the process, she failed to notice the “oneway=no” tag to the road.
Unfortunately, this was also overlooked by our internal reviewer. We will train editors and reviewers on "oneway=no" tags as a process learning exercise to prevent such mistakes in the future. 
Coming to the announcement to the local communities, we are doing the above-mentioned edits in the US, UK and DE regions from 2019, announced it in wiki pages and interacted with community on multiple fronts including dairy posts.
Thanks,
Regards,
Deepika
skyper (2023-01-19 16:06:37+00:00): Hi,
I clearly doubt that you only make changes based on driver feedback. There seems to be some AI searching for missing service roads and also for the task "added direction" but if you insist I would be happy if you share the evidence for each case with the DWG.
Yes, I understand that your are not willing to extend your wiki page but than clearly stick to the linked tag pages and if in doubt restrain from changes or provide the evidence like up to date images of the traffic signs. Reading about the generell rule to drive on the right side or even perpendicular parking space markings does not help at all.
Don't you think it would make sense to ask the community before updating or creating a task to sort out misinterpretations in the future before harm is done?
For the sake of your responsibility about your changes and as a sign of cooperation I ask you again to recheck all changes made the last several month belonging to this task. Why do you hesitate from your duty?

skyper
deepikja (2023-01-20 15:46:25+00:00): Hi Skyper,

Our internal centralized wiki page containing the SOP procedures we use to make edits adheres to the guidelines mentioned in the OSM wiki pages.
Every edit made by us on OSM is reviewed by our internal team for quality assurance. Unfortunately, the reviewer overlooked this error.
To ensure that we identify and correct any errors that may have occurred in this task, as suggested by you we will recheck all edits made w.r.t added directions task by 1/27/2023 and modify our sop accordingly to avoid any future misses. 
Regards,
Deepika
skyper (2023-03-14 13:50:33+00:00): Hi,
your system does not work or how do you explain all the bad changesets in February? Once more please publish your task description.
Additionally, I still find incorrect changes from Dezember and January which were not fixed, so your review was too superficial. As the general review and the second one did not catch the errors,I wonder how your reviews work. Could you please explain and document it. 
Additionally, please, mention the CS you fixed in the comment or the source.
Regards by a rather disappointed,
skyper
deepikja (2023-03-23 17:12:06+00:00): Hi Skyper,

We have conducted a preliminary investigation into “Added Directions” changesets as per your request. We have identified errors which were missed by newly onboarded reviewers from December-2022. 
As a remedy, we will conduct a second review of all the 1296 change sets created between Decemeber-2022 to till date by our experienced reviewers and fix errors. 
We will update you once the audit is done (ETA: 4/3/22). 
Additionally, we will re-train the reviewers who failed to identify errors to provide feedback to editors and to correct erroneous map edits. 
Our review team uses combination of OSMCha and our internal tool to conduct reviews for 100% of changesets created by editors. Reviewers have options to either “approve” or “sendback” changesets. Changesets that are marked as “sendback” will go back to editors for second round of editing to correct errors. However, in this instance, few of the newly onboarded reviewers overlooked the errors committed by the editors. 
We will ensure to capture all the errors created and retrain the team on the guidelines/etiquettes to be followed while editing on OSM.
Appreciate your guidance. 

Regards,
Deepikja
skyper (2023-04-28 00:12:08+00:00): Hello Deepikja,
even with my small sample size of ~40 changesets, I still find suspicious cases. Meanwhile I have to question your review system so, please, document it on your wiki page plus join the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/major-problems-with-amazon-edits/98385.
Regards,
skyper
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-24 06:44:44+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=36.068038%2C-95.917988%2C17.73
literan (2022-11-26 10:33:31+00:00): ну почему unclassified то? это же не улица, обычный service проезд
eggie (2022-11-24 06:58:07+00:00): .. en toch klopte het wel. Er wordt dan aangegeven dat er meer 'modules' op zo'n zendmast zitten. Overigens is het een onzorgvuldige import geweest uit 2009. De mast staat een eindje verder. 
Er zal vast wel het een en ander zijn aangepast aan die mast. 
Ik zet je verdwenen  umts weer even terug.
eggie (2022-11-24 06:59:09+00:00): reverted by changeset #129309093
eggie (2022-11-24 07:00:06+00:00): De gds en umts maar gelijk verplaatst naar de correcte plaats
aixbrick (2022-12-02 18:26:28+00:00): Hallo,
gibt es die Kantine nicht mehr oder warum "disused"?
Gruß
Osman Grannus (2022-12-03 09:30:16+00:00): Doch, die gibt es noch, aber keinen Pächter. Außerdem soll die Geräteausstattung nicht mehr den heutigen Anforderungen genügen, so dass Inverstitionen notwendig wären, die aber niemand bezahlen will.
aixbrick (2022-12-03 13:21:55+00:00): Alles klar, danke.
Snusmumriken (2022-11-24 07:29:08+00:00): Hej

Varför tog du bort väjningsplikten vid rondellen?
_Madfly (2022-11-24 18:36:21+00:00): Ursäkta att det var ett misstag, jag har lagt tillbaka dem nu.
Warin61 (2022-11-26 22:43:06+00:00): Simply:

Multipolygon relations out ways cannot can not share segments.

Relation deleted again.
aTarom (2023-04-01 09:52:15+00:00): hola Xevi, per casualitat no sabràs si aquest carregador és exclusiu de l'ajuntament?
Vull corregir el nom
"""ajuntamento"" de tossa de mar"
però tinc dubtes de si serà millor en "operator"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9657530617/history
Salutacions cordials i gràcies per editar
Xevi (2023-04-01 12:13:49+00:00): Fent memòria i mirant el changeset veig que aquesta informació la vaig treure d'una nota. Tot i això lo de corregir el nom de "ajuntamento" crec que es el que toca
etorciancio (2022-11-28 04:03:27+00:00): transporte público
silversurfer83 (2022-11-24 14:10:52+00:00): Danke :) Bin noch nicht dazu gekommen und der Kollege, der es krumm gezogen hat, auch noch nicht. Dein Tool muss ich mir mal ansehen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129309667
LuxuryCoop (2022-11-24 09:55:40+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
toyotagps (2022-11-26 09:22:01+00:00): Объясните, почему подняли статус дорог?
CoyKoi (2022-11-24 23:29:07+00:00): Il y a une erreur. ce n'est pas Agbonou
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129311195
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 04:30:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129311774
الجعبة (2023-03-29 11:31:48+00:00): This is not an import and I did it based on my personal information and my survey about the region on the social network, especially from Twitter, for example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116764142
is from:
https://twitter.com/amaaakn/status/1603429700721786882
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-03-29 11:59:37+00:00): Thank you for the response.
I apologize for the assumption.
Jakka (2022-11-24 16:17:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116765428
ceci n'est pas un building ?
building=farm_auxiliary
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=farm%20auxiliary?uselang=nl
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard
Tomas_J (2026-04-15 10:39:42+00:00): resurvey - je toto skutocne cesta so zakazom vjazdu a vstupu okrem majitela (access private)?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095132594
anirud (2026-04-15 20:15:24+00:00): Áno, je tam značka zákaz vjazdu okrem NDS. Bol som v Merkury Markete, a navigácia ma poslala touto cestou na diaľnicu, ale kvôli zákazu som neprešiel, tak som to opravil. Viď streetview.
archie (2022-11-24 09:58:07+00:00): Hej, det är den lagligt tillåtna hastighetsgräns (trafikverkets uttryck) som anges i maxspeed och den har av trafikverket angetts till 70 km/h. Jag har reverterat denna cs.
archie (2022-11-24 15:09:09+00:00): Tillåt mig att föreslå att du tittar på wikin om den här möjligheten att ange hastighetsgräns som avviker från den lagliga. Detta är måhända det du egentligen ville göra: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:advisory