piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hufkratzer (2022-07-24 09:28:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080735257 clearly looks like a riding arena (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena) in the aerial view and should be tagged as such, rather than with leisure=horse_riding, which is for complete riding centres (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding). The horse_riding tag rather belongs to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080735258 together with the name and website from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356676531 , like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/779725190
KartoGrapHiti (2022-10-10 14:24:48+00:00): Bitte trag in die Karte keine Objekte ein, die es nicht gibt. Ich habe das jetzt in highway=proposed geändert.
raccoss (2025-09-01 14:41:14+00:00): Ciao. Ho visto che hai aggiunto la way 1080738175, come percorso alternativo al sentiero G39. Io ho fatto proprio ieri quel sentiero e non mi sono accorto di quella variante.
Non discuto che esista, ma magari è possibile aggiungere qualche dettaglio? Per lo meno posso aggiungere il tag visibility=very bad visto che non è di facile individuazione e non è riferita neanche in altre mappe?
Ho poi corretto le parti del sentiero G39 che hai indicato come "stairs" le scalinate, da wiki, si riferiscono a "rampe di scale su passaggi pedonali"; l'ho cambiato in "path", ma con difficoltà "T3: demanding mountain highing" visto che i balzi anche di 1 metro in alcuni punti costringono a usare le mani.
vng_me (2022-07-23 20:22:11+00:00): Coastlines are broken after this changeset. You should be careful when editing linear/area objects with ID. Better to use JOSM and validator.
zluuzki (2022-07-23 17:21:10+00:00): Uhm, they exist?!?
Allison P (2022-07-23 18:12:02+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123985846
ma-rt-in (2022-07-27 15:47:01+00:00): Hi,

warum sollte den die Breite einer Wohnstraße widersprechen?

vg
Bierphysik (2022-07-27 20:15:59+00:00): Gude. Highway residential sollte imho dann verwendet werden wenn (zumindest in D) ein Auto durchpasst. Das ist hier mit 1.5m nicht der Fall.
hlfan (2023-08-11 13:36:01+00:00): Du hast hier die B178 als primary gemappt. Allerdings ist die B178 hier eine Autostraße, und trunk in Österreich äquivalent mit Autostraßen vorgesehen (siehe https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway=trunk#International_equivalence). Daher hast du auf dem von dir bearbeiteten Straßenabschnitt auch die Zugangsbeschränkungen geändert (siehe https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Austria), und zwar aufgrund unzureichender Datenbasis. Sollte sich die Situation vor Ort tatsächlich geändert haben, bitte ich um Belege, sonst folgt eine Zurücksetzung dieses Änderungssatzes.
hlfan (2023-08-18 21:44:48+00:00): hab's manuell zurückgesetzt
boskimario (2024-08-25 13:26:31+00:00): Błąd w opisie. Egzekucja miała miejsce w pierwszych godzinach Powstania Warszawskiego.
Warin61 (2022-07-24 00:49:30+00:00): Hi,
The university would also control the gaps between the buildings. 

The touching outer rings are a prolem. OSM Inspectors says "problem 	duplicate_segment", "problem 	way_in_multiple_rings" ..

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.84357&lat=-31.77631&zoom=6&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
sb9576 (2022-07-24 02:41:12+00:00): The OSM inspector messages can be fixed I think, next time I’m on.

Not sure about the spaces. I only know which buildings and parking lots the university either owns or leases, and even here I’m not always 100% where one building ends and another begins. But I wanted to start somewhere.

I’m not ready to assume anything about the gaps.
sb9576 (2022-07-24 02:50:25+00:00): But perhaps adding areas instead of buildings is the better way to go. They could just lease a part of a building, or sublet to third parties such as Darling Darling. 🤔
Warin61 (2022-09-02 00:35:30+00:00): "Relations of type multipolygon are used to represent areas (polygons), typically complex areas with holes inside, or consisting of multiple disjoint areas." The building here are not 'disjointed' so break the rules. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon 

Possibly use the site relation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site ???
Warin61 (2022-09-29 06:41:52+00:00): I have set this to a site relation. 

This avoids the error of shared segments in a multipolygon relation outer ways. Been ~2 months since the error was noted.
GinaroZ (2022-07-23 22:44:26+00:00): Hi, what is source=ScotLIS?
SeanDS (2022-07-24 07:37:34+00:00): Scotland Land Information Service at https://scotlis.ros.gov.uk/.
From local survey I confirmed house numbers at start of each street then used ScotLIS to check e.g. the semi-detached pairs are correct.
GinaroZ (2022-07-24 10:30:02+00:00): Thanks. Might be worth creating separate nodes instead of tagging the buildings with two housenumbers, as there is no address for "29, 31".
SeanDS (2022-07-24 10:59:58+00:00): I searched the forum on how to handle semi-detached houses having 2+ numbers and that was one of the suggested ways. Is there a more typical way to deal with this, e.g. a convention for Scotland/UK?
mcliquid (2022-08-01 07:38:22+00:00): The turn-restrictions at this point do not look correct at all. Will you take a look at it again?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2397733665
mcliquid (2022-08-01 07:39:33+00:00): Same for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/332361157
emergency99 (2022-08-01 11:54:34+00:00): Hello, are they now correct? I must say I normally do not work with these restrictions and was a bit confused about the directions that they need to go in. But I think I got it now.
fkv (2022-11-05 10:21:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14379245 stimmt auch nicht. Bei restriction=only... sollte die Rolle "to" jener Way haben, auf den man fahren muss, nicht auf den es verboten ist. (Das ist andersrum als bei restriction=no...turn.) Ich würde auch vorschlagen, nicht zu viele Änderungen bzw. an weit auseinander liegenden Stellen im selben Changeset zu machen, denn bei so einem Mega-Changeset kann man nicht mehr nachvollziehen, was dabei an einer bestimmten Stelle verändert wurde, geschweige das rückgängig machen.
Luzandro (2022-11-07 10:43:17+00:00): Die Änderungen von Dittersdorfergasse und v.a. Heigerleinstraße auf Hernalser Hauptstr. und jeweils tertiary -> secondary ergeben für mich auch überhaupt keinen Sinn

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/23712740

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/4583413

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3428548
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123976322
*abq* (2022-08-14 17:01:46+00:00): Please do not tag the signposts with name=randonee, as this is not the name. Rather use hiking=yes.
Merci,
Reiner
tontonfabrice (2022-08-15 05:29:14+00:00): Merci de me l'avoir signalé, je suivrai
vos conseilles maintenant.
rohieb (2022-07-23 13:55:49+00:00): Notiz: die alten reiterställe sind noch entkernt und eingerüstet, hier befindet sich definitiv noch kein Café oder Werkstätten.
geoaria (2022-08-26 14:18:50+00:00): یک مسیر خاکی را در اطراف دستگرد کشیده اید که در نقاط بسیاری با یک آبراهه اتصال دارد و روی آن رفته. خواهش می کنم در ترسیم ها دقت کنید ، مسیر ها به هیچ عنوان روی بقیه عوارض ترسیم نشود. و در صورت عبور از روی هم باید نوع تقاطع مشخص شود . تونل یا پل یا زیرگر و ...
geoaria (2022-08-26 14:22:24+00:00): تصحیح بخشی از ترسیم های شما زمان زیادی از بنده گرفت . دقت کنید
Jan Wilts (2022-07-23 14:11:16+00:00): De Gemeente wil minder verkeer over de kruising Aweg/Westersingel. Er komt binnenkort een herinrichting van de Westersingel, hierbij wordt deze voor een deel ook 30km/u gemaakt. 

Met het feit dat een deel van de Aweg al 30km/u is, en een deel van de Westersingel dit nog wordt, lijkt mij dit een logischere verdeling van de Secondary/Tertiary.
martiensch (2022-07-30 15:09:09+00:00): We zouden ook de hele noordelijke kant van de Diepenring op tertiary kunnen zetten.
Ik vind de keuze voor secondary op de Friesestraatweg wat overdreven. Daar wil de gemeente ook van verkeer af en heeft de afslag naar het Hoendiep deels onmogelijk gemaakt.
Jan Wilts (2022-08-01 18:12:11+00:00): Hmm misschien een goed idee. De gemeente wil volgens mij de hele Diepenring autoluw(er) maken. Uiteindelijk zal hij in zijn volledigheid naar Tertiary moeten gaan (denk ik).. 

Weet jij of de afslag Hoendiep > Friesestraatweg gesloten blijft, of dat deze op termijn weer open gaat?
85Bas (2022-09-17 10:07:24+00:00): Per toeval stuitte ik op deze changeset. Ik heb al langer het idee dat de classificatie secondary niet echt (meer) bij de Diepenring past en na het lezen van de opmerkingen hier heb ik maar de vrijheid genomen om de Diepenring naar tertiary om te zetten. Zie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126291573
martiensch (2022-09-18 11:35:32+00:00): @Jan: de situatie bij de aansluiting Friesestraatweg-Hoendiep is nu definitief omgebouwd.
aceman444 (2026-07-08 14:58:40+00:00): A slipway rarely has a name and I really doubt this one has the main name in German, when in Slovakia.
emersonveenstra (2022-07-28 14:46:00+00:00): Hi,

What is `$poi_type_tag = Geldautomat` on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9905990653?
Langlaeufer (2022-07-23 15:16:09+00:00): der rechte Rad/Fußweg ist separat erfasst, daher nur sidewalk left und nicht both.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123978416
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 11:42:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080763571/history

that is surface=woodchips, right?
danieldegroot2 (2022-08-02 11:38:18+00:00): Hey Tilia,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9906007796/history

Als je kan zien dat de brug hier al begint, zou je dan de brug kunnen aanpassen? Nu zit er een gat tussen het spoorgebied en de brug.

Groet,

Daniel
Tilia_J (2022-08-02 19:17:18+00:00): Beste Daniel, ik snap je punt en je hebt in beginsel gelijk.

Ik was bezig met het aanbrengen van landuse=railway van de A12 bij Velp TOT aan het spoorwegviaduct.

Ik kom tijdens het editen teveel zaken tegen die niet kloppen of aansluiten. Als ik dat allemaal meteen zou gaan aanpassen dan kom ik in de knel met de mij beschikbare tijd om het doel van mijn editsessie (landuse=railway) te bereiken en OSM is al verslavend genoeg ;-)

Als ik de aansluiting van de landuse op het viaduct ga aanpassen dan pas ik het liefst ook meteen het hele viaduct aan, voordat ik ook dáárover van deze of gene commentaar krijg.

Ik hoop op je begrip.

(ik heb net het hele viaduct maar aangepast)

Groet Tilia
danieldegroot2 (2022-08-03 09:20:01+00:00): Geen probleem. We hebben nog genoeg gaten in de wandelroutes ;-)
gurglypipe (2022-07-23 17:23:15+00:00): Hi, if you’re going to tag things as landuse=meadow rather than landuse=farmland, can you please clarify the tagging by adding meadow=pasture to make it clear that these aren’t actual wildflower meadows. There are vanishingly few actual meadows in the north west, and it’s useful to be able to distinguish them from the very common pasture farmland here. Thanks :)
phodgkin (2022-07-25 16:39:44+00:00): I think landuse=meadow without qualification is sound for "farmed grassland":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow

I think you'd need meadow=perpetual or natural=grassland (which I generally use for "wild" meadow).

I'm wary of adding meadow=pasture or meadow=agricultural without clear evidence of one vs. the other.

I do think distinguishing landuse=meadow from landuse=farmland is very helping for walking - there's big difference between a path across a muddy crop field and a path through grassland!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-11 10:16:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9905986550

co rozumiesz przez "zieleń" w nazwie?

że stoi w terenie zielonym? Jak tak to czemu fire_hydrant:position ma wartość "lane"?
bxl-forever (2022-07-23 15:57:38+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding names.

Just one point: in OSM the first letter of most names is always an uppercase character ("The English House" instead of "the English House").

Happy mapping.
bxl-forever (2022-07-24 11:26:59+00:00): I surveyed the area earlier today because I was intrigued why they would have two shops next to each other.

I regret telling you your edit was wrong: this is not the right building.  I fixed it.
Langlaeufer (2022-07-23 15:18:14+00:00): wenn das eine Service-road ist, wer darf sie benutzen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123979034
Dr_K_Nick (2022-07-25 19:09:47+00:00): Hmmm...
Der Wasserfeldweg ist vergleichbar gut ausgebaut (breit asphaltiert) wie der Horst-Schwelmer-Weg (nördlich). Ihn als Pfad zu kennzeichnen erscheint mir unpassend (da z.B. Fahrradfahren und Inline-Skaten problemlos geht) obwohl er durch Poller für den Autoverkehr gesperrt ist. Welche Kategorie schlägst du vor?
Langlaeufer (2022-07-25 19:37:44+00:00): ja o.k. das macht dann vermutlich doch Sinn
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-27 21:53:11+00:00): todas tus ediciones han sido eliminadas. son puntos personales con nombres de personas, no de empresas.
silversurfer83 (2022-07-25 09:05:59+00:00): Hallo und Herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)
schön, dass du hilfst die Daten aktuell und vollständing zu halten.
Eine Bitte: Wenn du POIs oder andere Features bearbeitest, wäre es super, wenn du in einer Stadt etwas getan hast zunächst auf upload (oder so) klickst, bevor du in einer anderen Stadt am anderen Ende des Landes wieder etwas änderst. So bleiben deine Änderungen für andere Mappende übersichtlicher.

Weiterhin viel Spaß
-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123979423
SekeRob (2022-07-25 20:12:10+00:00): Hi,

No this way is not lit, only a few lanterns at (some) driveway starts.  There are isolated lanterns popping up at driveways and crossings, often LED and solar panel/battery powered in the country side.

Unfortunately StreetComplete does not have the lit=limited option as what you can enter in the web based editors. Definitely the lesser wrong answer to the question here.
BTW, StreetComplete has an 'other' answer option which allows to split ways at points where situations changes e.g. paving type where some are first part asphalt and next part gravel.

ciao.
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-29 16:51:03+00:00): Hi Eebie,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
Eebie (2022-07-30 16:04:24+00:00): I didn't an import of the buildings in JOSM by using the tool "Intégration des batiments (PICC) dans OpenStreetMap" that is available for Wallonie since a few months. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Building_and_address_import
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-31 06:32:06+00:00): Thank you, but unfortunately I do not fully understand your answer. Is it an import or not? If the data was used for an import, this must also be indicated, e.g. as a changeset comment.
Eebie (2022-07-31 10:57:19+00:00): My reaction should have been: I did an import of the building. The source is indicated: GRB Import tool although from now on I will use the newer correct refence  GIM Tool: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geometry_Import_%26_Merge_Tool
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-31 11:22:11+00:00): Ok, thanks again.
Do you know the documented OSM import guidelines? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-03 15:39:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9906034706/history co rozumiesz przez "zieleń" w nazwie?

że stoi w terenie zielonym? Jak tak to czemu fire_hydrant:position ma wartość "lane"?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-25 04:28:35+00:00): Planuję usunąć zarówno

fire_hydrant:position=lane
jak i
name=zieleń, sprawny

ze względu na brak odpowiedzi tutaj
Anazaar (2024-11-25 08:37:32+00:00): HYDRATY są widoczne na mapach straży pożarnej i edytorach, na innych nie. Nie rozumiem po co DEMOLUJESZ ich robotę, ale nam to gdzieś. Rób co chcesz. Wykasuj im wszystkie. Po co mają strażacy widzieć hydranty. NIE PIESZ WIĘCEJ KOMENTARZY GDY DEMOLUJESZ HYDRANTY. Po prostu DEMOLUJ BEZ KOMENTARZA. Chyba proste i logiczne, ale pewnie nie dla Ciebie i znowu będziesz się rozpisywał i usprawiedliwiał.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-26 14:31:50+00:00): chcę poprawić twoje wadliwe edycje

by pomogło gdybyś odpowiedział na pytanie co próbowałeś zaznaczyć w danych OSM
Anazaar (2024-11-26 15:44:07+00:00): to TY demolujesz hydranty, a nie POPRAWIASZ !!! Nie pisz na ten temat więcej TYLKO DALEJ DEMOLUJ hydranty bez komentarza. CZEGO NIE ROZUMIESZ? (nie odpowiadaj i nie pisz więcej na ten temat). Jesteś bardziej upierdliwy jak komary, od ciebie i ich nie idzie się opędzić.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-26 17:01:03+00:00): Usuwam więc

fire_hydrant:position=lane
jak i "zieleń" z nazwy ze względu na brak zdolności do wyjaśnienia o co chodziło w twojej edycji

te informacje sa ze sobą sprzeczne

gdybyś zechciał wyjaśnić o co chodziło w tym tagowaniu a nie bawić się w postać z swojego profilowego zdjęcia (sith jakiś) to proszę, wyjaśnij co miało znaczyć "zieleń" w tagu name
Szymson (2022-08-22 20:24:57+00:00): Dlaczego nagle ten tor uzyskał status czynnego, skoro takim nie jest w rzeczywistości?
GeoFreak14 (2022-08-26 15:59:29+00:00): Przepraszam, wkradł się błąd. Już go naprawiłem
gscholz (2022-07-28 07:09:39+00:00): Hi Mkushi_99,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Ifakara Town", "Kilombero" and "Ulanga":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=36.44562&lat=-8.74554&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123979979

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-08-06 07:45:13+00:00): Hi Mkushi_99, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Gudo
Dodko (2022-07-24 20:12:30+00:00): name=Pitná voda
Opisné názvy sa nepoužívajú
Hufkratzer (2022-07-24 08:31:54+00:00): You have removed the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244367674 and replaced it with leisure=horse_riding . This object looks like a building in the aerial view, therefore I assume it was not intended to remove the building tag. Maybe it is a riding hall / indoor arena (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall). The horse_riding tag is not appropriate for buildings, it is for complete riding centres, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding ; better example in this region: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245104833
legofahrrad (2022-08-08 10:38:28+00:00): I'm sure the name of the fast food restaurant is not "https://shortymunich.de/"
dgitto (2022-07-26 09:59:36+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
Salvatore Saitta (2022-08-17 12:30:24+00:00): Grazie dgitto
felipeeugenio (2022-07-23 21:42:39+00:00): Estimado
Borró una calle completa. por favor cuidado con las ediciones. ya fue reparado.
saludos
maraf24 (2022-07-23 19:24:45+00:00): Rysowanie dachów budynków-wycofałem.
maraf24 (2022-07-23 19:23:11+00:00): Ręczne kopiowanie adresów, zamiast scalania - zniknęło source:addr.
Noen (2022-07-23 17:39:33+00:00): Hei og velkommen til Openstreetmap.
Som nybegynner er det naturlig at du ikke helt vet hva alle taggene betyr.
Det er ikke nødvendig å helgardere seg ved å tagge skiløper med «seasonal=winter». Det skal ikke tagges med «horse=no» der det ikke er forbudt for ridene. Kombinasjonen «ski=nordic» har jeg ikke sett før, taggen «piste:type=nordic» er den riktige.
maraf24 (2022-07-23 19:22:20+00:00): Wycofałem.
jcr83 (2022-08-05 20:01:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Je n'ai pas bien compris en quoi consiste cette correction. De plus, le bâtiment semble avoir disparu.
jcr83 (2022-08-05 20:08:05+00:00): En outre, les coordonnées des bâtiments ont été modifiées. Le cadastre est correct, il a été refait par des géomètres il y a 4 ans.
J'ai annulé les changements. Il reste l'erreur sur le multipolygone, à corriger, mais sans supprimer le bâtiment ni modifier les géométries.
Kovoschiz (2022-07-24 10:33:55+00:00): Please don't change `building:part=` for a single structure with different blocks.
BubbleGuppies (2022-07-24 18:27:40+00:00): Hello, apartment complexes can be tricky but you’ve done a good job. I have a couple suggestions to improve your tagging. 
- the buildings could be building=apartments, some advanced rages to use are building:levels=* to define the number of stories/levels and name=* if the apartment buildings are named like “Building 1” or something like that. 
- It’s a bit confusing but building=garage is for a single unit, whereas building=garages is for a row or multiple units. 
- the mailboxes can be tagged with amenity=letter_box. And just to be clear, if there is just a roof-like shelter over the boxes, and no walls, this is building=roof. Otherwise building=yes means  completely closed in with walls and a door. 

I think that are some options for you. But really you have the basics in place. Thanks for mapping and have fun! It can become addicting 😊
gpstracks (2022-07-24 05:55:52+00:00): Hi.
Is it possible to know the source of this edit?
Thanks
Vid_Pogačnik (2022-07-24 09:02:29+00:00): Hi,
That's how it's presented on the Tabacco map, No. 027. Also all discussions on various forums say that Jof di Confin is the peak 1761 m and Jof di Ungarina is the peak 1806 m, above the alpine meadow with the same name. Of course, the names are perhaps not written with exact characters. Jof should perhaps be Jôf. And it would be absolutely correct to include also the correct Friulian naming. Jôf di Ungarina also has a Slovenian name: Vogršček.
bikingaround244 (2022-09-03 03:35:40+00:00): Why are you changing it to path? 

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=631830147#map=19/42.36550/-71.07463)
aweech (2022-09-03 22:54:16+00:00): I can tell you've ever been there, but, if you had, you would know that that way is incredibly unpleasant to bike on with how thick with pedestrians it is. The asphalt path across the lawn is much better because it is wider and less space pressured, though it still has a lot of pedestrians. I should probably start tagging more ways like this as footways here in the city. I'm more used to semi-rural and suburban environments where those don't really exist besides sidewalks.
Valerio_Bozzolan (2022-07-23 16:45:20+00:00): The summary is wrong: Updated charging station.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-17 13:51:34+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3784974 ?
CjMalone (2024-04-03 14:37:02+00:00): Possibly https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=fitness_station ?
user_2066394 (2022-07-26 15:20:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080790546
Form passt?
Boerde (2022-07-26 16:07:14+00:00): Oh danke der eine Punkt gehört da nicht hin. Hab es korrigiert
gscscnd (2022-07-23 20:01:08+00:00): Nie, nie dodajemy takich opisów. building=house w zupełności wystarcza.
lonnez (2022-07-23 18:29:58+00:00): This is obviously not a trampoline park. I just hit the upload button too quick and left the old message there. This is actually just two adjacent bicycle parking stands at the Poway Library.
lonnez (2022-07-23 18:44:06+00:00): The source is accurate, an on-the-ground survey.
eggie (2022-07-23 17:47:26+00:00): reverted by changeset #123985067

Die BAG data sind wieder korrigiert.

Im Süden steht auch irgendwo Klein Vink bei 4-2097?

Grüss
eggie
eggie (2022-07-23 17:52:19+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453006796#map=16/51.4990/6.1889

und hier...  

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009083104
eggie (2022-07-23 17:59:56+00:00): Der ehemalige Mapper meint mit tourism =chalet den ganzen Resort. Sie meinen nur deine Ferienwohnung. 
It's okay!
rene78 (2022-07-27 08:32:47+00:00): Grüezi! "Während Öffnungszeiten" von was? Wo ist Hausnummer 17b?