piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mirasolera (2017-09-27 14:44:22+00:00): Hola, queria discutar el mapeo de bosque dentro de ciudades como Filadelfia, Neuland y Loma plata. Para mi no tiene sentido el mapeo de estos. Solo es una desviación (english distraction) de lo importante. Como se puede ver en ciudades de Alemania ahi no existe esto. Creo que deberiamos borrarlo. Creo que solo si hay una gran parte con bosque se puede dejar, como un parque o si una quadra es todo bosque. Que es su opinion?
alphensebezorger (2017-06-14 19:29:14+00:00): Correction on CS comment:
Instead of Arkel please read Noord-Scharwoude.
Cascafico (2017-06-15 06:24:38+00:00): Ciao,

puoi mettere il nodo della fermata dov'è nella realtà: qualche metro più ad ovest, staccato dall'asse strada.
nammala (2017-06-15 06:08:20+00:00): Hi salomvary,

welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have deleted track road which is private. Is it better to add `access=private` tag instead of deleting valuable data on the map.

Regards,
nammala
salomvary (2017-06-15 10:38:08+00:00): Hey nammala,

Hey, makes sense, I assumed a private road I have no way to verify no longer exists but it is also true that one should not change something that can not be verified (including removing things). Will restore and mark road access private.
salomvary (2017-06-15 10:46:15+00:00): Now that I looked there does not seem to be a straightforward way to restore that road. What do you recommend?
nammala (2017-06-15 12:05:36+00:00): You can go to JOSM and revert your changeset using reverter plugin and add the access tag . Is that sounds good?
JamesKingdom (2017-06-15 16:58:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49569097 where the changeset comment is: Restoring user error
JamesKingdom (2017-06-15 16:59:14+00:00): Fixed :)
nammala (2017-06-16 03:47:05+00:00): Thanks James for taking care of this :)
salomvary (2017-06-24 09:51:54+00:00): Thanks!
Cyclono (2017-06-15 09:36:43+00:00): Hi Phillip, 
Builinds in the netherlands are imported from kadaster based on how they are registered. 
The Erasmus building is registered as 1 building;
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=95757.782183233&geometry.y=436988.68894348&zoomlevel=5
I am not sure you can divide them into seperate buildings. What you can do is, go to the Dutch forum on openstreetmap and ask them there. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Allroads (2017-06-18 14:12:35+00:00): Voor het indelen van gebouwen is er de key 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-06-15 07:03:01+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
literan (2017-06-15 12:30:44+00:00): достал дублировать
user_3216889 (2017-06-14 20:28:46+00:00): René,

"Toegangsweg ..." niet als naam gebruiken; er staat vast niet zo'n straatnaambord  Bij paden normaal geen naam, maar in dit geval lijkt me "de Leegte" prima om aan te geven dat de woningen erlangs dat adres hebben.
En kijk uit voor het simpelweg herhalen van eerder gebruikte "opmerking bij wijzigingen" als je een bewerking opslaat.

Succes verder,
Henk
RHWitteveen (2017-06-14 21:03:24+00:00): Vreemd dat de oude opmerking gewoon blijft staan. Ik zal er in het vervolg op letten en aanpassen.
Minh Nguyen (2017-11-12 01:54:04+00:00): Rushville doesn’t meet the criteria for place=city. Based on its population, it should be place=village, though place=town is better since it’s a county seat and thus is more prominent than any other place in the county. I demoted the POI in changeset 53703346.
ridixcr (2017-11-15 19:32:54+00:00): Hi Minh!

Thank you so much for the correction.

Have a nice day.
Carnildo (2017-06-14 21:37:53+00:00): Please don't make up names for things.
nammala (2017-06-15 06:03:13+00:00): Hi faith Sadak,

May I know the reason behind deleting the information of the Village like buildings, landuse and roads. Is the area being developed and if it could you please mention the source of adding this data. Since Bing is not updated. 
Also, noticed that you have been adding area=yes tag which is not a appropriate way of tagging.
Could you please confirm the edits you have made.

Best Regards,
nammala
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-07-05 20:28:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50067857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Turkey - attempts by various people to contact the user have failed.
fkv (2018-04-03 23:06:19+00:00): Are you sure there is a cave? It isn't in the cave cadastre, and I did not see a cave when I walked by.
PacerCZ (2018-04-07 15:51:03+00:00): Hi, I am not 100% sure, but the pit, that I have a litte studied, is, IMHO, a mouth of an abyss (or at least a steep ponor).
pitscheplatsch (2017-06-15 06:32:57+00:00): Hi PreGU, welcome to OSM.
Please, keep the history. Don't delete and remap existing data.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history)

Furthermore, please use the changeset comment field (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments). Thanks

For more information about your edits, see http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49540689
chillly (2017-06-14 20:57:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
Thanks for the detail. The address details are useful, but they belong in the address tags.The name tag should just have the name of the bar in it.

Hope that helps.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-07-05 20:28:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50067857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Turkey - attempts by various people to contact the user have failed.
nammala (2017-06-16 05:40:33+00:00): Hi Apsblitz,

Observed you doing vandalism on the map. It is not appropriate way of doing it. OSM is considered as real map of the world. Make sure you add valid data on map not fictional data. I have reverted your changeset.
Please don't continue doing this again.
Upendrakarukonda (2017-06-16 05:42:11+00:00): Hi ssamaria,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added landuse tag to restaurant and name fantasyland to the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/783640165 here. Can you check that and verify? If restaurant is demolished, you can delete that tag.

Regards,

Upendra.
user_3216889 (2017-06-14 22:16:40+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
user_3216889 (2017-06-14 22:25:13+00:00): Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park, want nu zijn op de grond aanwezige onderdelen weg!
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam.
Wijzigingenset teruggedraaid.
mueschel (2017-06-23 13:03:03+00:00): Hi,
das Tag hier sieht merkwürdig aus...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2313608108

Gruß, Jan
literan (2017-06-15 12:44:22+00:00): Ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, с вики: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE Эту правку вам уже откатили.
Murcik (2017-06-15 14:48:44+00:00): Из ссылки следует, что там все name надо убрать, а не только name:sr
literan (2017-06-15 15:18:36+00:00): Скорее, "Продукты" следует перенести в inscription=. Кажется, не на тот раздел вам ссылку дал: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#name:language_code
Murcik (2017-06-15 15:43:36+00:00): Отсалось понять, где у MAPS.ME редактирование inscription.

Попробовал удалить в MAPS.ME name и name:ru, стало еще хуже.
literan (2017-06-15 16:06:16+00:00): в мапс.ми этого нет. Давайте уж я из нормального редактора поправлю это и близлежащее
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-06-15 07:08:39+00:00): Czemu zdjąłeś znacznik ronda z tego ronda?Hę? http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=500416614
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-06-15 07:10:38+00:00): W dodatku, to co ja narysowałem dobrze (zjazdy i wjazdy) Ty popsułeś. Dokładnie chodzi o to, że zrobiłeś niestyki - zjazdy/wjazdy są niedołączone do ronda. Teraz to poprawię, ale proszę uważniej na przyszłość.
Carlos Martin Noriega (2017-06-17 00:06:04+00:00): Hola!
¿Esa laguna dónde queda?
Darwin Daniel Solano Chalco (2017-06-17 06:46:28+00:00): Está cerca de Progreso. Ahí donde marque con las coordenadas. Tienes que caminar unos 200 metros de la carretera y puedes ver muchos pelícanos, flamencos, etc
Carlos Martin Noriega (2017-06-18 20:49:54+00:00): Ok. aunque desde vista de satélite no se aprecia la laguna.
Gracias!
Ben Allard (2017-06-20 20:38:56+00:00): I fear that changeset introduces a strange amount of aligned points and right angles.

I want to believe the wrong shortcut key has been pressed somehow.

It would make sense to go over it again, and probably revert a few of the modifications.
snigdhap (2019-02-27 05:49:03+00:00): "Hi Yunita sari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 500553296 classified as 'Unclasified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
divya_sree (2019-05-02 16:21:17+00:00): Hi  Hanif Arafah Mustofa,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 119324810 classified as 'secondary_link'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
hanifarafah (2019-05-03 01:35:52+00:00): Thanks for your advice. Actually, in the field, this way is an alternative way to connecting between secondary road and primary road, and many vehicle through this road. What do you think about it, change this tag to residential or keep it as secondary road?
Supaplex (2017-07-09 17:44:11+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Alan (2017-06-15 18:52:54+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! But in the future, if you are going to make edits in several different places in the world, can you do them as separate changesets? It makes it easier to see what happened that way.
Alexander-II (2017-06-15 05:08:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо, что дополняете OSM. При указании памятников в поле name не нужно писать "памятник". Это итак ясно из типа точки. Я поправлю.
mavl (2017-06-15 16:33:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет неполные отношения (не хватает ролей или есть повторения ролей):  
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7333316  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7333317  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7333318  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7333319  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7333320  

Отношение запрета должно иметь три роли:  
1. Линия на роли from (откуда)  
2. Точка на роли via (через)  
3. Линия на роли to (куда)  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_-_%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
pesec (2017-06-16 05:57:44+00:00): исправлено
Hernan (2017-06-19 18:20:37+00:00): Que quisiste marcar con esta edición? Hay un árbol que se llama así dentro del parque?
Colegio Concordia (2017-06-19 22:03:33+00:00): En el marco del: Día Internacional del Ambiente  el Colegio Concordia, forestó con ejemplares nativos el parque ubicado en frente al Centro Cívico. Los árboles fueron donación de Ambiente de la  Provincia de Córdoba  y el vivero local  Wichan Ranquen.
Hernan (2017-06-19 22:22:08+00:00): Entonces deberías borrar el árbol, ya que esa etiqueta se usa para marcar árboles individuales y no áreas y luego dibujar el área dónde está la plantación con landuse=forest http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse%3Dforest donde se puede aclarar la especie del árbol. En el link que te pasé podés ver toda la informacion
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 18:03:50+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
pitscheplatsch (2017-06-15 07:02:45+00:00): Please, keep the history. Don't delete and remap existing data. Thanks! (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history)

Same as here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49547073
eggie (2018-03-10 15:17:07+00:00): Goorsestraat met fietsroute uit de knoop gehaald. Fietsroute hersteld.
nmsl🤣 (2017-08-11 09:06:58+00:00): 大佬，
在建高速公路是：
highway:construction
construction:motorway
而在建高速公路匝道是：
highway:construction
construction:motorway_link
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 18:03:31+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
whb (2017-06-16 12:17:30+00:00): Hier gibt es eine Frage zu einer Hausnummer (606):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1031778
Wahrscheinlich war 60 gemeint?
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-02-27 04:29:23+00:00): Hi khuc tinh ca, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500580089 this way and other several ways tagged as highway = cycleway. I personally think it should be residential. Any explanation about how it could be a cycleway ? it would be helpful if I get some cool local knowledge stuff. thank you
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 18:03:06+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 18:02:54+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
Carnildo (2017-06-15 20:42:07+00:00): Standard practice for schools is that the name goes on the school grounds, not on the school building, except in unusual cases such as two schools sharing a campus, or when the building has a name different from that of the school.
bhousel (2017-06-17 01:57:08+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
streinger (2017-06-15 08:52:47+00:00): исправьте, пожалуйста, за собой ошибки и соедините пешеходные дорожки со всеми проездами и дорогами, которые они пересекают, посмотрите как это сделано рядом, а то получается ошибка: пересечение без общей точки.
Alexander-II (2017-06-15 10:52:38+00:00): Другими словами, эта ошибка приведет к тому, что роутинг (навигатор) не сможет верно построить маршрут по этим дорогам.
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 19:47:33+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 18:02:35+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
friedel_hn (2017-06-15 08:22:12+00:00): Hi _bextacy,

the Mobilat club in Heilbronn has been recorded back in 2009. Your entry is a duplicate and I removed it therefore. 

For the future please check if an object is already present in OSM before creating a new entry. And pleas check the other objects you created. I don't feel like cleaning up the world after you this morning.
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-15 06:50:27+00:00): Total names copies: 9362
Total name to name:en: 2645
Total name:he to name: 1
Total name to name:he: 6092
Total name:ar to name: 92
Total name to name:ar: 532
Total unhandled errors: 337
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 18:04:15+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
SomeoneElse (2017-06-18 18:34:03+00:00): Hi Marek,
Can you please explain what were the actual problems caused by this changeset and the others on which you have similarly commented?
Also, you may find that that using emotive language such as "stop destroying" is less effective at communicating what you want to get across than a simple question asking why a certain change was made.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
imagico (2017-06-22 13:04:49+00:00): I would like to add that what bdiscoe did here was not in any way destroying a detailed map.  He removed nodes which had a very little influence on the overall geometry because they were almost exactly in the middle between the next and the previous node.  See http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=49549696

Since the original mapping here contains a mixture of too few and too many nodes (too few in the sense that there are many sharp corners in the mapping which do not actually exist in reality, too many in the sense that the influence they have on the shape is small compared to the level of detail of mapping) this is a sensible step.  If it is worth the trouble is a different question of course.
SomeoneElse (2017-06-22 16:25:02+00:00): For info, see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1385 .
bdiscoe (2017-06-23 05:46:26+00:00): For what it's worth, I wrote OSM messages to marek kleciak explaining these edits, and even described the detailed steps he can do in JOSM to do the cleanup himself.
marek kleciak (2017-06-23 07:16:50+00:00): We are in touch with bdiscoe now. I wrote him about reasons for this mapping. We have opportunity to make an very exactly example for nepali authorities and show the results during SOTM Asia 2017. All old, too less forest areas should be removed/modified. I hope for help of you all: The goal would be to introduce  our map for the administrative purposes. In Nepal we have an special situation because of activity of KLL. So we can help from outside with precisely mapping.
imagico (2017-06-23 07:41:17+00:00): Who is 'we' here?

Keep in mind that planning and organizing of mapping activities and development of mapping conventions should be public.

Although there is not yet a formal policy on organized mapping activities it is good practice to document such activities and reference this in changeset comments/tags.  If you develop a mapping system for woodlands in Nepal for others to take cue from this needs to be documented and open for scrutiny, critique and modification by other mappers.
marek kleciak (2017-06-23 07:50:00+00:00): We, is Kathmandu Living Maps. As you probably know from german forum I do a lot for Nepal and try to inform communities in Germany and Poland about recent situation there.
What you wrote about mapping activities is a part of old OSM communication problem, but you´re absolutely right, I should write a comment to the changesets.
marek kleciak (2017-06-26 05:49:54+00:00): Hi everybody, KLL wil post information about this Project in the Wiki Project Nepal. Meanwhile I analyzed approach described by  bdiscoe. Using generalization factor of 1.0 m we change the areas of smaller Farmlands in forests by up to 5%. I suggest the generalization factor of. 0.3m which make changes by around 1% od smaller areas. The goal of this projest is to achiee a map with whole landuses like: 
- Forest
- Scrub
- Farmland
- Residential
- Scree
- Sand
- Water

This can allow the observation of this area and analyzing it.
An example are climatic changes and destruction of forest and water areas.
Calculation of farmers productivity
With other words, an new paradigm of OSM use.
SomeoneElse (2017-06-26 15:32:38+00:00): @marek - having nodes closer together doesn't make for a map that matches reality better; it just makes it more difficult to edit.  If you've got some specific examples perhaps write it up as a diary entry?
marek kleciak (2017-06-26 16:14:53+00:00): Absolutely. This matter needs an proposal and discusion of the community.
bdiscoe (2017-06-28 03:50:12+00:00): Marek the starting point of your analysis is incorrect.  It assumes that the existing, hyper-noded wood areas are precisely correct with no uncertainty or error bars.  Consider the factors involved - imprecise criteria, human variability, seasonality, poor resolution, loose rectification, etc. it is absurd to claim certainty or accuracy within 20%, or for some parts of Nepal with even worse imagery, 50%.  A change of 5% in the area only reflects the mathematical adjustment due to a larger number of convex than concave polygons in the digitization.  It is completely dwarfed by the uncertainty.

Apply a strong simplification to these bad landuse polygons, or the community will have to do it for you (again).
marek kleciak (2017-06-28 04:39:19+00:00): Ben wrote: imprecise criteria, human variability, seasonality, poor resolution, loose rectification.

We have Premium Digital Globe images from last year for whole Nepal. Factors like human variability or seasonality are general for all OSM maps. Only activation of the community AND in this case local authorities, can help with such problems. Let´s talk with local community about.
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 18:04:01+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
iorant (2017-06-16 12:44:37+00:00): Привіт. Можна поцікавитися звідки взяті дані про назви та висоти вершин? Дякую.
Gubar (2017-06-16 14:36:14+00:00): Hi, Sorry, my Ukrainian is at a way too beginner level so I have to answer in English. I used old Austro-Hungary military surveys, and I also found names and altitudes on old Soviet maps, mostly in the Synevyr area. I have to admit I am unsure whether those are good to use. The out-of-copyright maps wiki page doesn't clear things up about it. Around the Bukivtsovo area where I spend most weekends I also use knowledge of locals and my own gps data.
Colin Smale (2017-06-15 08:13:59+00:00): Hi Nick, please don't use "X or Y" for alternative names. The "alt_name" tag is intended for that. In this case it is best to keep the name consistent from end to end: name=River Lea and alt_name=River Lee
Nick in Kew (2017-06-15 18:53:04+00:00): Hi - thanks for the heads up. It's actually known as the River Lea or Lee and the spelling is either / or, and along its length its known by both spellings. Every map has it as "River Lee or Lea" (or the other way around). So I thought I was helping by clarifying. If you look at the name as "Lea" you might not see the alternative. Mostly it's known as the Lee - at least since my childhood.... what's the best solution to this?
SK53 (2017-06-17 15:34:59+00:00): Exactly as described. Put one name in name, the other in alt_name. The OSM geo-search engine Nominatim will find either: just as it finds London and Londres. If data consumers (such as cartograpers) want to show both names they can do name || ' or ' || alt_name. Making that choice up-front for them makes consuming the data much more complicated.
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 19:48:34+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 19:42:20+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 19:39:32+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 17:54:49+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.
marek kleciak (2017-06-18 19:38:49+00:00): Stop destroying detailed map using generalization tools. In developing countries like Nepal eactly map can save human life. Please first ask, then act.