piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2015-02-26 20:28:53+00:00): Prawie dobrze :)
Jednak by dodać plac zabaw, należało w edytorze wybrać "Obszar" a nie linię. 
Wówczas z listy po lewej stronie można będzie wybrać kategorię - "Plac zabaw". Bez kategorii tego nic się nie pokaże.
dudka (2015-03-04 12:10:05+00:00): плохое уточнение
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3813248#map=18/49.63207/36.37928
Hjart (2015-02-27 08:20:25+00:00): Is there anything we can do to make Frøslev-Jardelund mose actually render as a bog?
Zartbitter (2015-02-27 15:52:31+00:00): Use natural=wetland if it is appropriate. wetland=bog (which is already mapped) is dependent on natural=wetland). But I don't know if landuse=conservation will superpose this.
SK53 (2016-05-22 11:18:50+00:00): You deleted http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169640838/history in this changeset, but there are isolated stiles appearing around Round Wood. I know some paths mapped in this area suffered from inaccurate GPS traces, but I'd like to know why an apparently surveyed path got zapped.
Durko_freemap (2015-03-06 07:38:43+00:00): Zdravim miky,
ten pramen vyschol? Vdaka za odpoved.
Durko_freemap (2015-03-06 07:42:31+00:00): Zdravim miky, tu ste nakreslil jednu cestu a jednu ciaru, k tej ciare treba doplnit nejake tagy. podla bingu odhadujem na cast asfalt(highway=residential) a cast hlina (highway=track), doplnte to prosim Vas. Dakujem.
*Martin* (2015-03-06 08:15:43+00:00): Ahoj Miki

Meno tej kaplnky je "Kaplička"? Skôr si myslím že názov bude "svätého XXX".

Ďalej, dávaj prosím popisy ku changesetom (políčko "Pripojiť správu" po stlačení tlačítka "Uložiť zmeny").

Ďakujem.
escada (2015-03-30 03:46:34+00:00): Vreemde situatie waar de N77 over 2 stukjes niet meer primary is, met tussen in een rotonde die nog steeds primary is. Het lijkt mij beter om de N77 de hele tijd primary te houden.
Wat denk jij ?
Eebie (2015-03-31 21:04:19+00:00): Jij hebt gelijk dat het er vreemd uitziet zo twee stukje secundary tussen primary. Ik durf inderdaad nogal eens primary veranderen in secundary waar ik toevallig bezig ben. Ik vind in OSM te veel wegen primary zijn.  Ik was van plan om een artikel te schrijven over de classificatie van wegen in Vlaanderen als OSM discussiestof. Ooit viel het belang van de N-wegen af te leiden van het nummer maar dat was in 1985 toen de N-wegen hernummerd werden. Na 30 jaar is de situatie van veel wegen ingrijpend gewijzigd. En sinds 1989 zijn de gewesten  bevoegd voor de wegen (autosnelwegen en gewestwegen). De classificatie van de Vlaamse wegen is vastgelegd in het Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Vlaanderen  http://www.vlaanderen.be/nl/publicaties/detail/ruimtelijk-structuurplan-vlaanderen-geco-rdineerde-versie-2011 zie onder meer kaart op pag. 486. In de versie 2011 staan ook nog de secundaire wegen. De classificatie van de secundaire wegen is de bevoegdheid van de provincies en staat in de Provinciale Ruimtelijke Structuurplannen en daarom staan de secundiare wegen niet meer in de nieuwere versie van het RSV. Ik ga werk maken van dat artikel om voor discussiestof te zorgen.
H@mlet (2015-02-27 21:32:28+00:00): Hello,
I'm starting on the following task :
http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/907#task/188
I've noticed that residential polygons in the vicinity, called "Mchenga" and "Kachulu".
But there were already some landuse=residential, created a year ago.
Also there is a "Mchenga" place node, 6 years old, but it falls in your Kachulu landuse...
Well nothing catastrophic, but you should try and clean up older data if your data is more precise.
Regards?
wilsonandolo (2015-02-27 21:46:38+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for the observation. The previous data were a little flawed. Kachulu is a larger area, covering the whole s143 up to the Mchenga is a little further North. I will try to clean up the old data.

Regards.
wilsonandolo (2015-02-27 21:59:41+00:00): Done.
H@mlet (2015-02-28 02:25:39+00:00): Thanks for the corrections.
I'm afraid I spotted another trouble.
If you look at the area via openstreetmap.org, at some zoom levels, you'll see that the lake is "flooded" by the wetland !
I think (not sure yet) that's it's because since this edit, the outer of the wetland relation crosses the inner.
Why did you (was that really by the way ?) push the wet land, mainly around the "Likangala" ?
Is it dry land now ?
Maybe this whole "wetland" is useless, by looking at the history of the relation, it seems that it is the extent of the lake, like ten years ago.
Have you any idea about this ?

Best regards.
wilsonandolo (2015-02-28 11:04:43+00:00): Hi. 

I am not responsible for pushing the Wetland region around Likangala or Thondwe Rivers. As a matter of fact, I have also been attempting to remove this for past couple of days. It is misleading. I come form this area. Most of what is called wetland is now under active cultivation throughout the year (rice in the wet season, and other winter crops in the cool and dry season). I would suggest moving the Wetland region closer to the Lake. It makes more sense to identify these areas as cropland and not as wetland.
H@mlet (2015-02-28 14:03:34+00:00): All right, I'll try also to clean up, at least the crossing parts.
But my question was, is there still wetland around this lake ?
Maybe we should just delete the relation wetland.
Regards
wilsonandolo (2015-02-28 14:50:12+00:00): Technically, the land cover type around the lake is Wetland, and the areas  are generally internationally recognized as such. However, the land use is agriculture, which is a slight variation from the strict definition of a wetland, where man does not heavily modify and determine the ecosystem. My take is that we are more interested in the land use, not the land cover, so I suggest removing the Wetland.
H@mlet (2015-02-28 15:04:15+00:00): I've just tried to correct it wrt the lake bank.
Hope that will satisfy the renderer.
Regarding the complete removal of the wetland, I don't feel expert enough to have an advice.
Regards.
wilsonandolo (2015-02-28 16:44:15+00:00): Noted.
Skippern (2015-02-27 11:18:27+00:00): Nao e necesario coloque "Quadra de Tênis" no nome, o sport=tennis e suficiente
Skippern (2015-02-27 11:19:00+00:00): Nao e necesario coloque "Quadra de Tênis" no nome, o sport=tennis e suficiente
Lyubchenko Denis (2015-06-20 17:25:35+00:00): это действительно относится к милитари?
HolgerJeromin (2015-02-27 08:22:37+00:00): Danke!
G4rp (2015-02-27 21:18:44+00:00): Ciao stefbeat

Questo percorso esiste veramente oppure è solo una tua prova?

G4rp
stefbeat (2015-02-28 19:16:29+00:00): No, lo devo cancellare sorry!!!!
715371 (2015-03-01 02:14:05+00:00): Ich habe jetzt gerade nicht den Überblick, was deine Änderung war, daher kommentiere ich mal deinen Kommentar.

IMO ist es besser pro Praxis einen Knoten zu pflegen, weil sich die Informationen über die Praxen i.d.R. sehr unterscheiden: Fachrichtung, Telefonnummern,...
nkbre (2015-03-01 09:26:30+00:00): Die Änderung ist (zumindest im JOSM) sehr einfach nachzuverfolgen. Es ist ein Knoten einer Praxis hierher verschoben worden, die eben in dieses Ärztehaus umgezogen ist. In den Namen war die volle Bezeichnung eingetragen, einschließlich Eröffnungstag.
Wenn sich jede Praxis in diesem Haus so raumgreifend in der Karte zeigt, gibt es Platznot und der Zufall (Renderer) entscheidet, welcher Anbieter tatsächlich gezeigt wird. Weitere praxisspezifische Informationen waren nicht vorhanden. Von der Datenbankseite gesehen, hast du recht, wenn OSM ein Branchen-Adressbuch sein soll. Dazu sind unterschiedliche Meinungen möglich - vollständig und aktuell ist so ein Verzeichnis ohnehin nie.
naomap (2015-03-23 08:08:07+00:00): Bonjour.
Tout d'abord bienvenue sur le projet OSM, et bravo pour vos contributions notamment au Malawi. 
J'ai un doute sur la pertinence du "Point culminant de Centrale". Je doute que ce point soit un véritable "peak", de plus son nom doit être vérifiable : y a-t-il un panneau sur place ?
Le rond-point de la Noë n'est pas correctement cartographié : il n'est pas relié au réseau routier. De plus le rond-point existe déjà, sous forme de plusieurs éléments linéaires : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8lQ. C'est un peu compliqué les rond-points sur OSM...
Qu'en pensez-vous ? Je peux effectuer les corrections moi-même si vous le souhaitez, mais je tenais d'abord à en discuter.
Cordialement,
Antoine.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-27 23:47:18+00:00): Dwie sprawy:
1. Proszę kalibrować podkład Bing lub korzystać z podkładu Geoportal
2. W miejscowościach bez ulic zamiast addr:city używamy tagu addr:place. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Pozdrawiam
PierZen (2015-02-28 19:31:15+00:00): Modifications systématiques aux règles sans d'abord en discuter avec la communauté. SVP venir discuter sur https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca
Xmypblu (2015-02-28 10:58:28+00:00): прекрати использовать 2Gis  или твои правки придется откатить - в проекте запрещено обрисовывать и копировать данные с других карт и источников имеющие любые копирайты.
Tchiller (2016-07-07 13:43:04+00:00): Was ist eine Design_Agency? Den Tag kenne ich nicht. Gruss!
trigpoint (2015-02-27 14:31:14+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM. I see that you have started to add what appears to be a building in Newport, but you have stopped without adding any tags to the way. You should probably tag it with building=yes, do you know what the building actually is? I am fairly local but not familiar with Newport.
Ask away if you need any help. Looking at the map, Newport is in need of some TLC, there are a lot of shops missing and could use someone with local knowledge.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-27 12:38:05+00:00): A czemu kolega usunął bocianie gniazdo? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2957165159
rlp839 (2015-02-28 18:05:58+00:00): construction=cycleway ist damit auch erledigt und kann weg?
chris84 (2015-02-28 19:07:46+00:00): jep, ich habs wohl in den Tags übersehen.... bitte gerne nochmal prüfen ob die weiteren Tags soweit passen, ich hab das aus Zeitmangel nur schnell hopplahopp gemacht, damit der Weg in der Karte sichtbar wird, weil er inzwischen fertig und nutzbar ist. Danke!
maraf24 (2015-03-04 11:06:28+00:00): Na pewno ten plac zabaw ma swój adres ?
sanrm (2015-02-27 13:17:55+00:00): Нечаянно удалил дорогу, не пойму как вернуть данный пакет правок 29134959
SomeoneElse (2015-02-27 13:10:21+00:00): ... as neither are signed at the http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206564047 end.  More survey needed to check things around here.
JJJWegdam (2015-02-27 18:15:31+00:00): Good evening,

however this removal was fully according to the guidelines, I'd like to recommend to give mappers some time (at least 24 hours?) to respond to problems with their changeset. Also when the changeset is, in your opinion, a clear mistake (in the way you describe in your profile). Let it be clear though that I don't blame anyone; the above is just a suggestion.

Kind regards
Jeroen
Hjart (2015-02-27 14:14:10+00:00): Hej
Jeg kiggede på hvad du har lavet her og fandt nogle fejl som jeg har tilladt mig at rette.
Tak for bidraget til vores projekt.
Hjart (2015-02-27 14:47:25+00:00): Hej
Jeg kiggede på hvad du har lavet og så at du ikke havde fået din sti korrekt forbundet til Bystien. Jeg har tilladt mig at rette dette (plus lave en del andre ændringer i området også). Har du et gps-spor (eller meget gerne flere) for stien som du kan lægge op?

Hvis du bor i nærheden, så er der også andre stier i nærheden som man på luftfotos kan se dele af og som du gerne må tegne ind
Nakaner (2015-02-28 09:34:26+00:00): Erster Changeset und es gibt wirklich nichts am Tagging zu kritisieren. Respekt! (Da der iD-Editor keine Validierung hat, machen Newbies meistens Taggingfehler, z.B. falsch formatierte Telefonnummern)
naoliv (2015-09-17 11:55:01+00:00): dclarks, "retorno" não é um nome ideal para os trechos de retorno.
Você pode utilizar "destination=Retorno" ao invés de "name=Retorno" nesses casos.
dclarks (2015-09-17 12:02:46+00:00): ah blz, vou alterar eles.
dclarks (2015-09-17 12:07:43+00:00): Tem como eu buscar todas as minhas alterações que possuam name=retorno?
naoliv (2015-09-17 12:18:01+00:00): Dá, mas só para os objetos que você foi o último a mexer:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bvh

Abre o JOSM e depois clica em Export → JOSM nesse link. Ele vai exportar para o JOSM.
Mas se você quiser, dá para ver tudo o que tem de "retorno" no Brasil:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bvi
naoliv (2015-09-17 12:18:56+00:00): Ou se só quiser ver onde estão os locais, clica em "Run". Os últimos que você mexeu são poucos.
dclarks (2015-09-17 13:29:39+00:00): Bacana a ferramenta. Fiz as correções! Aos poucos vou aprendendo. Obrigado.
naoliv (2015-09-17 13:31:12+00:00): Obrigado pelas correções.
eggie (2021-02-26 13:34:36+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
brightj (2022-10-24 12:51:43+00:00): Many of these are pointing the wrong way.  Cliff line should be at the top of the cliff with the arrows pointing downward.
FvGordon (2015-06-07 09:05:48+00:00): Weist die Buchforststraße als Einbahnstraße wirklich von Norden nach Süden? Am Anschluss an die Brücke über die Stadtautobahn, wie auch an der Ampel im Norden dieser Straße müsste man wenden, um auf die Stadtautobahn zu bzw. in die Buchforststraße einfahren zu können. Auch die Autos in Bing weisen auf eine entgegengesetzte Richtung der Einbahnstraße nach Norden hin.
jglauche (2015-06-07 09:40:02+00:00): Ja, das stimmt! Die ist noch falsch rum drin
4rch (2015-03-01 13:48:14+00:00): Please use appropriate changeset comments so that others can understand your edits. Why have you moved this administrative boundary? Was it incorrect? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30273432
muralito (2015-02-28 02:19:09+00:00): Hola. ¿Que es lo que intentaste mapear?
mweper (2015-02-28 16:07:45+00:00): Hola xrosarinox. Un consejo, trata de agregar la etiqueta amenity=school para identificar escuelas y no solo building=school

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Geogast (2015-03-05 13:15:28+00:00): Du hast hier massenweise nodes umgetaggt. Hast du das irgendwo diskutiert? Gibt es einen Konsens, dass Berührungspunkte von Tram-Gleisen und Straßen nicht als level_crossing getaggt werden? Ich weiß, dass das keine eigentlichen Bahnübergänge sind - das heißt aber nicht, dass damit das Tagging klar wäre.
4b696d (2015-03-05 17:29:27+00:00): Hab es rückgängig gemacht: #29271701
Geogast (2015-03-05 13:15:41+00:00): Du hast hier massenweise nodes umgetaggt. Hast du das irgendwo diskutiert? Gibt es einen Konsens, dass Berührungspunkte von Tram-Gleisen und Straßen nicht als level_crossing getaggt werden? Ich weiß, dass das keine eigentlichen Bahnübergänge sind - das heißt aber nicht, dass damit das Tagging klar wäre.
4b696d (2015-03-05 17:29:06+00:00): Hab es rückgängig gemacht: #29271701
gileri (2015-02-28 22:58:16+00:00): Bonjour, je pense qu'il serait intéressant de mettre un landuse=construction à la place de ce qui était là, ne pensez-vous pas ?
vinc39 (2015-03-10 19:33:09+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui vous avez raison. J'ai fait la correction.
b-holdet (2015-10-26 19:27:56+00:00): Hej,
waterway=dam er nok ikke helt det rette her.
"dam" på engelsk er ikke "dam" på dansk men "dæmning".
Kun på Australsk er "a dam" "en dam"
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=dam?uselang=da
/Flemming B.
cadsauxk (2015-02-28 19:34:19+00:00): Você alterou numerosos limites minicipais, mas não descreve o que foi feito.
ze bernardes (2015-03-02 18:02:35+00:00): Eu estou ajustado a divisa da Bahia.
Erivelton Guedes (2015-02-27 19:22:37+00:00): inclusão do Condomínio Murano
rab (2015-03-28 15:45:03+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier diese Relation angelegt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4633522
Bei dem "from" Weg ist aber eine Rechtsabbiegespur eingetragen. Dieser Widerspruch sollte bei Gelegenheit mal aufgelöst werden.
Gruß
rab
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-02 10:53:08+00:00): Hello and sorry for bothering you about an ancient edit!

Do you remember/can/visit/recognize from shop brand what you meant for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3375218137/history ?

Would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvariety_store be also a good or better tag?
gtalbot (2023-05-02 18:45:33+00:00): Hi, This is effectively a very old change set. ;-)
I suspect that the tag "Variety_shop" did not exist when I made the edit. (The page documenting the tag was created in 2018.)
In fact I created another instance of the store chain and on that one I did use the "variaty_shop" tag.

So yes the "Variety_shop" tag is in fact better. I will made the change ASAP.
Homicide Baltimore (2015-02-27 18:37:11+00:00): Homicide Is Working The Police!
saintam1 (2015-02-27 22:10:58+00:00): Ресторант Щастливеца има малко по на север (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1977614899). За два различни ресторанта ли става дума или искахте да промените другия?
Kris Gaydarov (2015-03-05 12:21:02+00:00): Има новооткрит ресторант на този адрес.
saintam1 (2015-03-06 21:33:20+00:00): А, не знаех. Мерси!
ToniE (2017-10-10 09:30:59+00:00): Hallo Chris,

Du hast hier vor über 2 Jahren "motor_vehicle=no" gesetzt. Stimmt das (noch)?
Wenn ja, dann müsste - wegen Bus - "psv=yes" dran, oder?

Gefunden bzgl. 290/293 durch
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen/Transportation/Analyse#Landkreis_M.C3.BCnchen_-_200_-_299

Viele Grüße
Toni
gnlpfth (2017-10-25 19:41:57+00:00): Hallo Toni,
sowas ähnliches hatten wir schon mal, mir muss hier eine Panne passiert sein, die ich mir im Nachhinein nicht mehr erklären kann. Wenn hier die Auswertung irgendwo noch aufmuckt wegen mir, einfach reverten.
Grüße,
Chris
ToniE (2017-10-25 21:54:38+00:00): Danke Chris,

und Danke für den Fix.

Grüße
Toni
gileri (2015-02-28 10:56:10+00:00): Bien vu, j'avais suivi la discussion autour de ce nouveau tag mail oublié de les corriger :)
marc__marc (2019-07-03 20:01:15+00:00): Hello,
what's the meaning of maxtents=yes ?
Regards,
Marc
Constable (2017-04-09 19:16:29+00:00): Sir, I know this changeset is two years old but I'd like to understand the reason why you added the highway=track tag to great part of the ski pistes in Val d'Isere and Tignes.
A track is a dirt road, a piste is a piste and during the summer just few of them become dirt roads. I've been updating the mtb/vtt downhill trails in Val d'Isere and Tignes in the last few years and found a lot of pistes tagged as highway=track even tough during the summer I know for sure they are just meadows, not tracks, at all.
Hope you don't mind me asking this; just trying to understand.
Thanks
Cheers
RFuser11 (2017-04-10 18:41:06+00:00): Hi, of course i dont remember it. I hope you will tag it in best way if necessary.
Constable (2017-04-11 10:06:18+00:00): cool, I'll keep checking for errors then. Thanks for your answer!
Cheers
*Martin* (2018-05-24 20:27:05+00:00): Ahoj Spagy,

Pri Peresi si pridal nejake railway=level_crossing pri elektrickovej trati. To tam naozaj su zavory?
Spagy (2018-05-24 21:24:44+00:00): Ahoj Martin,
railway=level_crossing oznacuje len bod v ktorom sa pretína trať s cestou.
A závory tam niesu preto je tam aj tag crossing:barrier=no
*Martin* (2018-05-25 04:56:59+00:00): Ahoj. Ospravedlnujem sa, mas pravdu, zle som pochopil ten tag :).
muralito (2015-02-28 11:35:52+00:00): Hola. ¿Tenes claro que tipo de asociacion es?
Capz conviene agregarle la etiqueta office=asociation o algo de ese estilo.
ph3nx (2015-02-27 22:58:54+00:00): fixing bus routes
KKS (2016-05-01 18:54:45+00:00): Змінив місцезнаходження зупинки, судячи з цього відео  тут тільки переїзд
https://youtu.be/uUgEhJdiWh0?t=5m10s

сама зупинка на 04:55
muralito (2015-02-28 11:30:29+00:00): Hola esl1981.
El "no oficial" quizas convenga ponerlo en la etiqueta "note". 
Ademas, si es el mismo nombre de la calle que continua mas al suroeste, lo mejor es ponerlo igual.
Saluidos.
FTA_dwg_archived (2015-03-03 04:29:18+00:00): Hi there,
I noticed you added a few features here with a source of Bing. Unfortunately, the current Bing imagery does not point to an airport feasibly existing at this location. Have you personally visited this airport, or did you acquire this information from a data source that has released its data under compatible terms with OSM's license? Either way, could you in the future include that source with the changeset and use a more meaningful changeset comment? It's hard for fellow mappers to dissect what is being mapped without a description. --FTA
4rch (2015-03-05 09:53:34+00:00): The mapper added also other islands [1] which are currently under construction. I've asked him three months ago which sources he used but he didn't answer my questions.

When you compare the OSM coastline with current satellite imagery of the island [2] you can see that it can't be retrieved from satellite imagery like Landsat. It seems to be retrieved from plans/shapefiles/etc.

[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26858643
[2] http://www.tagesschau.de/multimedia/bilder/spratly-inseln-101~_v-videowebl.jpg
FTA_dwg_archived (2015-03-07 03:56:39+00:00): I have removed the coastline because this was added over the coastline/reef you had previously deleted that was already present in the location. I am leaving the airport for now to give you the benefit of the doubt as to the source. Could you please elaborate on it? Thanks, FTA
4rch (2015-03-07 12:42:18+00:00): For the moment I've mapped the current state of the reef. [1] The image I've used for mapping is from 22.02.15: http://i.imgur.com/OTNWAnE.png
As you can see on the image there isn't an airport yet so I'd propose to remove it or to tag it with something like proposed=aerodrome

Best regards, 4rch

[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29307166
chnav (2015-02-28 07:06:29+00:00): Здравствуйте, я уже неоднократно писал вам и вашим одногруппникам - поясняйте свои художества. Ни на одном доступном мне спутнике в т.ч. свежайших Landsat я не вижу подобной архитектуры. Прекратите портить карту.

Т.к. я ни разу не получил ответа - я направляю жалобу в DWG на блокировку всех участников этого вандализма.
chnav (2015-02-28 07:54:12+00:00): Правка откачена полностью как вандальная (фиктивный парк имени самого себя, магазин, фиктивные здания, дороги и т.д.).
Направлен запрос на блокировку пользователя.
chnav (2015-02-28 07:56:06+00:00): ...ещё и улица имени себя.
zool (2015-03-01 08:00:00+00:00): OpenStreetMap is an attempt to create an accurate map of the world. Please do not add personal / test data to OSM.
Dr Dipankar Roy (2015-02-28 06:37:01+00:00): ok
Dr Dipankar Roy (2015-02-28 06:38:37+00:00): সরকারি সংগীত মহাবিদ্যালয়
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-01 00:16:49+00:00): Dobrze jest dodawać kompletną informację adresową do budynków. W tym przypadku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160344146 brakuje miejscowości (addr:city) i ulicy (addr:street), jak również można dodać kod pocztowy (addr:postcode). Kompletna informacja adresowa pozwala prawidłowo wyszukiwać takie adresy w nawigacjach itp.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-28 10:26:36+00:00): Hi - could you please explain the source of the name:zh changes in here?  What made the previous name:zh for the United Kingdom wrong and the current one correct?
HubMiner (2019-05-20 21:54:58+00:00): Hi, could you review this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3376088200/history
opening_hours=destination
rickmastfan67 (2015-04-17 06:33:21+00:00): I'm curious, but why did you in this changeset (and others) change how the ref tag for PA 5 Alternate was tagged?  In 99.9% of PA, we do it as 'PA # Alternate', not 'ALT PA #'.
Your Village Maps (2015-04-17 21:02:01+00:00): Because it wasn't rendered using the standard OSM rendering; it only showed up with the MapQuest Open renderer.
Your Village Maps (2015-04-17 21:06:58+00:00): By the way, I just tried to switch to view using MQO and it was blank (light grey). Cycle, Transport, and Humanitarian show up, but not MQO. Weird. I did check a number of times after I made the edits to make sure the PA highway shields for the Alternate PA 5 stayed the same, and they did.