piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-27 08:00:41+00:00): [out:xml][timeout:50];{{geocodeArea:天津}}->.searchArea;(nwr["natural"="heath"](area.searchArea););out meta;>;out meta qt;
Niiepce (2022-01-30 16:04:19+00:00): Thank you for the correction!
daganzdaanda (2022-01-27 11:34:17+00:00): Hi Hayden, 
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place". 
Also, what about this tiny bit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025105477 
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584
daganzdaanda (2022-01-27 11:34:18+00:00): Hi Hayden, 
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place". 
Also, what about this tiny bit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025105477 
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584
daganzdaanda (2022-01-27 11:34:27+00:00): Hi Hayden, 
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place". 
Also, what about this tiny bit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025105477 
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584
daganzdaanda (2022-01-27 11:34:28+00:00): Hi Hayden, 
thanks for adding a source. Have you seen the wiki on boundary=postal_code? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=postal_code
"This tag should not be used in countries where a postal code does not represent a precise area (for example, in the United States). It also may not be verifiable in many countries."
So it's a little bit difficult... You first had this as a place=*, maybe that was better after all? All the other info (name, population, wikilinks) would seem to fit better for a "place". 
Also, what about this tiny bit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025105477 
That can't be a "rough estimate". There aren't any houses that would have a postal_code.

Note please: I was checking your edits since you made an obvious joke edit (and we don't want the jokes to become too much in OSM). You are actually adding very valuable local detail most of the time, so thank you for that :-) and keep up the good work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116653584
daganzdaanda (2022-01-27 11:35:36+00:00): huh? osmcha, what happened here???
smootheFiets (2022-02-27 14:09:07+00:00): Hoi JeroenK88,
Goede actie, alleen de building-tag had je beter niet kunnen verwijderen. Het blijft toch een pand, en zonder building-tag wordt het niet gerendert. Ik heb het even gerepareerd.
Groetjes, smootheFiets
JhowieNitnek (2022-01-27 13:09:57+00:00): Where is the source that that is the full name? I can only find Passage Chambon - Chambondoorgang
Thierry1030 (2022-01-27 13:39:08+00:00): Alban Chambon is the name of the architect -> 
https://monument.heritage.brussels/fr/Bruxelles_Laeken/Avenue_de_la_Reine/A001/23267
JhowieNitnek (2022-01-27 13:45:40+00:00): Yeah but that doesn't mean the passage has that name. the name is Passage Chambon - Chambondoorgang without Alban
philippec (2022-01-27 13:15:46+00:00): Mechelen Tivolibrug.
Kan ik er nu al over of moet ik wachten tot 1 februari ?
SPQRobin (2022-01-27 16:27:33+00:00): Ik weet niet of het nu al toegankelijk is. Het stond al zo voor mijn bewerking. In elk geval 1 februari is nog maar enkele dagen.
philippec (2022-01-27 16:42:21+00:00): Het is maar dat ik er niet voor niets naartoe rij.
Dimacn (2022-01-29 06:36:24+00:00): Эта дорога типа service. У вас же есть инструкция как добавлять дороги в OSM? А также не обязательно придумывать название дорогам. Если это не улица и нет официального названия то поле название (тег name) не заполняйте.
daganzdaanda (2022-01-27 10:08:32+00:00): Congratulations, somebody did notice this LOL.
Now could you please revert this?
philippec (2022-01-28 20:09:19+00:00): Mechelen AZ ziekenhuis.  Het geplande Tivolipad van JanFi komt er blijkbaar niet.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718488643
aleph_null (2022-11-01 12:22:59+00:00): Hey ShakyIsles, I was just wondering: where does the name "North Passgae [sic] Island" come from? It shows up on Bing Maps but I could not find it in the Gazetteer or other sources.

Maybe it would be better to only have the name of the archipelago with this island and Motutawaki as members?

Cheers!
Ds5rUy (2022-02-10 12:29:15+00:00): Hi, would you mind letting us know what's your rational for deleting seemingly the whole of the Perth Bicycle Network? As far as I can tell, these all still exist as signed routes on the ground?
MKnight (2022-01-27 08:54:56+00:00): Moin, ich fänds ganz gut, wenn Du in der source auch osmose mit angibst. 
Zum einen sieht man dann, dass da schon wer dran ist, zum anderen werden evtl. auch andere Benutzer auf osmose aufmerksam gemacht.
kartonage (2022-01-27 08:57:25+00:00): Hej,

klar, kann ich gern machen. Hatte ich glaube ich ursprünglich irgendwann auch mal. 

Beste Grüße
DaveF (2022-07-16 21:19:49+00:00): Please don't delete valid railway stations. (different codes)

Please don't remove valid tags (station=subway)
Ds5rUy (2022-02-10 12:29:12+00:00): Hi, would you mind letting us know what's your rational for deleting seemingly the whole of the Perth Bicycle Network? As far as I can tell, these all still exist as signed routes on the ground?
alyaa_hossam (2022-02-01 07:26:51+00:00): Dear StephanyGA,
I noticed that you used bing imagery in your source and your edit didn't match the image for example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31586209 shifted 7+ meters from the centerline in the satellite image, you can use the best satellite imagery to draw a building and don't move the street.
Regards
alyaa_hossam
SvM (2022-01-28 09:33:47+00:00): День добрый!
Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании дорог.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать.
Приер: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025121050
А так же, будьте внимательны, вы накладываете дороги одну на другую и не соединяете при пересечении
денис Удмуртия (2022-01-28 09:45:16+00:00): Добрый день! В программе OSM дорога обозначена, а в геоинформационном модуле ее нет
SvM (2022-01-28 15:37:19+00:00): Так как вы вносите изменения в OSM, необходимо придерживаться правил принятых сообществом OSM!
user_11609320 (2022-01-27 09:27:07+00:00): the wording on the san joaquins website makes it seem like passengers are picked up where greyhound stops in the terminal. That is bay 10. But I know that RTC makes greyhound drop off people on gilespie. I am assuming amtrak does too. not sure though
M!dgard (2025-07-05 10:20:50+00:00): Bonjour, je voudrais vous notifier que vous avez ajouté un nœud avec traffic_sign=BE:C31g (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9452197504), c'est une code belge donc probablement c'est par hazard.

Cordialement, M!dgard
Tschaeck (2022-03-04 20:03:55+00:00): Hallo AndySchulte, ich glaube, da ist dir bei der Gerberstraße ein Missgeschick passiert. Aufgrund der Vielzahl an Änderungen an dem Changeset  wollte ich da nichts unternehmen. Könntest du da die Straßen wieder "passend" setzen?
AndySchulte (2022-03-05 05:44:13+00:00): Hallo Tschaech, Danke dir für den Hinweis. Ja da ist mir anscheinend ein Missgeschick passiert, habe es mit CS#: 118114638 wieder in Ordnung gebracht.
Grüße Andy
Tschaeck (2022-03-05 06:02:32+00:00): Danke dir
scai (2022-04-10 17:57:12+00:00): Dieses Restaurant existiert nach wie vor und ist geöffnet. Sah das vor zwei Monaten anders aus?
user_2066394 (2022-04-10 18:00:26+00:00): Ausgangspunkt war folgender Fehlerhinweis:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3022561
scai (2022-04-10 18:17:05+00:00): Hm OK, kann jetzt nicht sagen seit wann es mittlerweile wieder offen hat. 

Es hilft, wenn du im Kommentar der Änderung die URL zum zugehörigen Kartenhinweis mit angibst.

Ich habe das POI entsprechend bearbeitet.
user_2066394 (2022-04-10 19:03:38+00:00): Deshalb hatte mich die Kommentierung kurz irritiert, die URL war im source-Feld miteingefügt.
scai (2022-04-11 04:53:28+00:00): Oh das stimmt, komplett übersehen 🙈

Nagut, hat sich ja jetzt aufgeklärt 🙂
user_2066394 (2022-04-11 14:03:45+00:00): Einwandfrei :+1:
mavl (2022-01-28 18:21:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет улицы поверх других улиц. Дубликаты улиц удалены.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
englu (2022-01-29 09:43:09+00:00): Cześć, zmiana przebiegu ścieżki 293601857 była niepoprawka. Może Twój ślad gpx był przesunięty, bo jak spojrzysz na zdjęcia satelitarne z Geoportalu i na nagrabe ślady ze Stravy (https://www.strava.com/heatmap#18.00/16.50586/50.58333/hot/all), to widać, że biegnie tak jak w poprzedniej wersji. Pozdrawiam.
balandzik (2022-01-29 10:56:28+00:00): OK, dzięki. Ale zniknęła też ścieżka wzdłuż torów, która na pewno była poprawna
englu (2022-01-29 14:36:24+00:00): To chyba nie w moim changesecie, bo nic nie usuwałem. Nie wiem o którą ścieżkę chodzi, ale jeśli zniknęła, a była poprawna, to proponuję dodać ją ponownie.
4004 (2022-01-31 00:46:06+00:00): не стоит убирать страницу если она именно этой заправки
4004 (2022-01-31 00:47:07+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116801181
Ds5rUy (2022-02-10 12:29:05+00:00): Hi, would you mind letting us know what's your rational for deleting seemingly the whole of the Perth Bicycle Network? As far as I can tell, these all still exist as signed routes on the ground?
aaronsta (2022-02-10 14:58:29+00:00): Hi Ds5rUy.
This was deleted for the following reasons.
->The routes are just routes, and do not serve any practical function or any purpose in reality, as largely they are fragmented, and consist of riding on roads without any dedicated infrastructure.
->The signage has not been maintained, and maintenance is the responsibility of the respective local government authority, which varies wildly. Beyond the funding in the 1990s, signage has been maintained ad-hoc. There lacks any consistency. New signage is not installed.
->If you live in Perth, I seriously doubt you would have ever used these routes for navigation, nor would you have ever purposefully ridden by the route, instead of taking a more direct or safer route option as to on road cycling.
->The routes are circuitous.
->The OSM information has not been maintained to reflect changes, and the OSM application of the routes were not consistent.
ortho_is_hot (2022-02-11 01:06:49+00:00): Hi,

In regards to the routes:

"largely they are fragmented, and consist of riding on roads without any dedicated infrastructure" - this is representative of routes across Australia; many routes in Sydney are like this and area just sharrows, however as they are still signposted they are mapped as routes.

"the signage has not been maintained, and maintenance is the responsibility of the respective local government authority ... signage has been maintained ad-hoc" - this may be the case however councils likely maintain a list/map of routes (at least thats how it works in NSW). Signage is also not always maintained properly in my experience.

"if you live in Perth, I seriously doubt you would have ever used these routes for navigation, nor would you have ever purposefully ridden by the route, instead of taking a more direct or safer route option as to on road cycling." - they are still routes nonetheless, often times I find myself following or deviating from a route at will however that does not change the fact that they are routes and infrastructure is generally designed to cater for these routes.

"The routes are circuitous" - see above

"The OSM information has not been maintained to reflect changes, and the OSM application of the routes were not consistent" - in this case then routes should be reviewed and updated where necessary, but I do not think that outright deletion is warranted

These map edits and wiki changes have attracted some attention on the mailing list; it would be appreciated if you engage with that list as well (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-February/015748.html)

Thanks,
otho_is_hot (Luke)
aaronsta (2022-02-11 02:00:11+00:00): Hi Luke :)
Thanks for you feedback,
To add to this I would like to add that the Department of Transport has stopped supporting and referencing these routes. The latest information on these routes is about 7 years old, and itself was copied on from the most recent modifications in the late 2000s / early 2010s.
The Perth Bicycle Network was part of a State Government political push in the mid 1990s, support for and maintenance this has declined since then.
The only thing that remains of these routes are the old signs which were installed. There is no special infrastructure. 
I am a regular cyclist, and someone who lives in Perth, I followed a great number of these routes to check before undertaking this edit, signage is incomplete and new signage is not installed, vandalised signage is not replaced, and it is the responsibility of the local governments, who have largely moved onto other cycling initiatives and projects. OSM was one of the few places where the PBN is still referenced.
ortho_is_hot (2022-02-11 14:28:13+00:00): Hi aaronsta,

Thanks for confirming that this is the case; since I'm not from WA I have no practical way of determining this. If the routes are properly dead in the water then I would suggest bringing this up in the mailing list as I think that such a large change should be discussed with other mappers (a few WA members & bike riders have left their thoughts).

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot (Luke)
aaronsta (2022-02-15 11:22:31+00:00): Hi Luke,
Thanks!
There definitely needs to be more routes mapped, a-lot of new projects like Safe Active Streets, bicycle boulevards, new paths, bike lanes etc. There's something called Your Move now which has some info about safe / good roads and paths for bikes. Looking at a few of these, and considering they hadn't been updated to reflect the Department of Transport dropping support for the PBN a few years ago, their irrelevance in light of these new projects and considering that really all there was of them on the ground were some albeit incomplete signage, as well as many of them needing updates as the relations had had issues come up over the years, I considered it alright to remove the PBN. I was hoping when I get free time over the next few months to update it based on Your Move and the most recent information available. The great thing about OSM is that anyone is free to make changes, so if people want to add some new bike routes that would be fantastic! The inclusion of the PBN was no longer relevant. I don't feel it necessary for me to get personally involved on the mailing list re the Wiki changes, I am confident that if there are changes or revisions which need to be made or discussed they will be, and do not need my involvement.
tonyf1 (2022-02-24 08:52:36+00:00): Hi Aaron

My sincere thanks on behalf of the Australian Open Street Map community for your many contributions to the map.

Unfortunately, there is some dissatisfaction in the Australian Open Street Map community with some of your larger edits including wiki changes on bikes and paths and the deletion of the Perth bike route network.

We ask you to seek consensus from the community before making large changes, particularly changes which reverse prior  understandings and are large in scope.

Your changes to the wiki on bikes and paths are a particular issue in this letter. We propose a six step process in reverting the Australian Tagging Guidelines to community understandings of tagging practice.

 1 get community support from talk-au for this process
 2 Contact Aaron and get his agreement
 3 Thorsten rolls back the wiki to an agreed state
 4 Dian tidys up the wiki
 5 Aaron does not edit the wiki until Dian has finished
 6 we do not call for DWG intervention unless a party will not follow the agreed process 

We are at step 2. It is important that we know you have read this letter. Please reply by changeset comment or better by a post to https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/

This is your opportunity to put your case. There is a lot of discussion on talk-au regarding your edits. I suggest you read it and respond. Please let us know whether you agree with the 6 step process and if you do not agree, your reasons.

Thanks
Tony Forster
Sam Wilson (2022-07-13 03:04:23+00:00): There is more discussion about this happening here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/need-to-reinstate-deleted-pbn-bicycle-routes-perth-western-australia/1873

I think we should go ahead and undelete these relations (and the other bike routes deleted in other changesets).
abakus_uploader (2022-01-27 23:31:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ameziol (2022-01-30 08:03:45+00:00): Czy powinna być tertiary? w sumie do niczego ważnego na razie nie prowadzi; sam nie wiem czy bardziej pasuje residential czy unclassified
Czev92 (2022-01-30 11:53:24+00:00): To jest dobre pytanie.. Same parametry drogi i jej docelowe zastosowanie jako łącznika z drogą do Katowic oraz dojazdem do Nowego Osiedla Piłsudskiego raczej pasuje pod tertiary. Natomiast natężenie ruchu i otoczenie drogi na ten moment niekoniecznie. 

Skoro w temacie, myślę, że warto by również się zastanowić nad klasyfikacją ulicy Józefa Mazura i Józefa Poniatowskiego. Wydaje mi się, że status tertiary mają tylko ze względu na to, że są drogami powiatowymi, a jeżeli chodzi o stan rzeczywisty, to już Handlowa bardziej zasługuje na ten tytuł.
maraf24 (2022-01-30 15:11:25+00:00): unclassified
ameziol (2022-03-09 19:01:10+00:00): @czev92 Poniatowskiego widzę że już zmieniłeś i nie znam tych okolic, ale na mapie to wygląda sensownie, zastanowiłbym się też nad downgradem reymonta, choć nie mam dobrych argumentów.
Co do handlowej jako tertiary to nie jestem fanem bo imo troche dubluje gierkówkę
Wracając do Hallera to kiedyś to zdecydowanie będzie tertiary, ale w tej chwili jest zawyżona, myślę tylko czy razem z nią na unclassified nie zmienić też siemianowickiej żeby była ciągłość (o ile to jest jakikolwiek argument)
Czev92 (2022-03-11 17:39:58+00:00): @matiziol Reymonta też mogłaby skorzystać z downgrade. Argumenty są. Po pierwsze, droga jest bardzo wąska, obudowana, o niskiej prędkości i praktycznie jednopasmowa ze względu na parkowanie uliczne i jednokierunkowość. Po drugie, większość zdecydowana ruchu nielokalnego idzie Katowicka. Południowa Reymonta służy tak naprawdę tylko innym ulicom jednokierunkowym, które do niej wpadają. Jedyny fragment, który faktycznie pełni funkcję tertiary to łącznik Borowej z Nowopogońską.
abakus_uploader (2022-01-27 23:31:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Warin61 (2022-01-27 22:06:19+00:00): Hi,
Problem with relation 13727652 leisure=track. The roles are reversed from what they should be - example the 'inner' has the role 'outer'.
abeck58 (2022-01-28 02:59:27+00:00): fixed
mini-me (2022-01-27 11:41:14+00:00): Вот только почему точку поставили по адресу Купчинская 9?
eggie (2022-01-27 10:24:46+00:00): Dag Rob... De Vensteeg heb ik doorgetrokken tot het einde. Ik gebruik PDOK 2021 7cm als achtergrond. Daar zitten geen blaadjes aan bomen en zie je meer.
Jij gebruikt PDOK 2019. 
Die bomen bij nr 4 zijn overigens nu gekapt. 
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2022-02-01 16:47:54+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the value definition of lamp_type (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lamp_type)
lamp_type 	mercury 	The light source uses a mercury-vapor lamp. 
lamp_type 	electric 	The light source uses an electric lamp of *an unknown type*. 
Why is the new key light:lamp_type  necessary?

Здравствуйте! Посмотрите, пожалуйста, на определение значения lamp_type (см. https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lamp_type).
lamp_type mercury В источнике света используется ртутно-паровая лампа. 
lamp_type electric В источнике света используется электрическая лампа *неизвестного типа*. 
Почему необходим новый ключ light:lamp_type?

автоматический перевод
MosKartograf (2022-04-20 05:23:54+00:00): Спасибо за замечание! light:lamp_type обоснован https://github.com/sb12/OSMStreetLight

Thanks for note! light:lamp_type  is product of http://osmstreetlight.bplaced.net/#17/55.61521/37.68335 , see https://github.com/sb12/OSMStreetLight . I'll review reason of this tag. Maybe it's really synonym.