piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2020-07-27 16:19:40+00:00): la frontera norte de Hato Corotú no me parece corresponder mucho al texto de página 285 de la gaceta 23664 (1998-10-31), y que pena que no pusiste los nombres de las dos quebradas ahí mencionadas.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-10-05 20:59:42+00:00): Não existe este trecho da rua rc7 https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7712215055 e nem aquele prolongamento da Alameda das Rosas que chega ate ela que voce desenhou.
luizmeme (2020-10-06 21:06:23+00:00): Olá, amigo. Já foram feitas as correções mencionadas, nas quais não foram propositáis. Sobre a rua que você mencionou não existir, você é residente de Rio Verde? Pois é um trecho em construção no qual eu já trafeguei.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-10-06 22:58:14+00:00): eu nao moro na cidade, mas essas vias se estão em construção não deveriam estar marcada como residenciais ainda. eu acabei de marca-las como "construction", também poderia deixar como trilha se estão em cascalho ainda. verifiquei em imagem de satélite de ontem que elas nao existem: https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2&lat=-17.77552&lng=-50.93263999999999&zoom=16&preset=2_COLOR_INFRARED__VEGETATION_&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=20&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2020-04-01%7C2020-10-02&atmFilter=&showDates=false
luizmeme (2020-10-07 19:31:18+00:00): ok, grato pelas observações. bom trabalho.
mariotomo (2020-07-22 14:05:19+00:00): por favor: fuente y procedimiento. es necesario para poder mantener esta información en la base de datos.
Alvarado2510 (2020-07-26 19:56:24+00:00): https://web.archive.org/web/20111213131353/http://www.asamblea.gob.pa/APPS/LEGISPAN/PDF_GACETAS/1990/1998/23664_1998.PDF
http://www.asamblea.gob.pa/APPS/LEGISPAN/PDF_GACETAS/1990/1997/23242_1997.PDF
mariotomo (2020-07-26 20:55:14+00:00): hola, bien, pero … y el procedimiento?  son documentos "fotográficos", cómo los has procesado?
mariotomo (2020-07-26 22:18:02+00:00): veo el primer documento, y no me imagino cómo hayas traducido las instrucciones en coordenadas de puntos.  podrías explicarlo, apuesto que será muy instructivo para todos.
Alvarado2510 (2020-07-27 14:01:20+00:00): Buenos días, bien te explico, la documentacion redactadas en las leyes de la República de Panamá, las coordenadas son establessidas en UTM, las. Cuales. Al ir leyendo he interpretando en el mapa, las convierto en grado y luego a decimales, para facilitar el trabajo.
mariotomo (2020-07-27 15:24:25+00:00): eh, pero entiendes que si uno quiere validar tu trabajo, deberías por lo menos indicar la página de donde sacas la descripción.  los pdf de tu enlaces son puro fotográfico, no funciona la búsqueda textual.
mariotomo (2020-07-27 15:33:33+00:00): dices: »las convierto en grado y luego a decimales« … pero, cómo?
Alvarado2510 (2020-07-28 22:50:29+00:00): en este link podras encontrar la pagina que uso para convertir las coordenadas UTM a decima: http://padeepro.com/converterutm.html
Alvarado2510 (2020-07-28 23:34:24+00:00): Se que el mapa de OSM esta bastante desactualizado a la realidad, por eso me faltan algunas caracteristicas naturalez, pero allí voy a la marcha.
mariotomo (2020-07-28 23:40:16+00:00): al parecer, no alcanzo explicarme.  te estoy preguntando »de dónde sacas la información«.  cuál parte de la pregunta no te resulta clara?
mariotomo (2020-07-28 23:53:27+00:00): además … cómo hace un waterway=river a empezar desde un natural=peak, no sólo no sé, sino no es lo que dice el documento que afirmas estar utilizando como fuente.  todas veces que el documento menciona la divisoria de aguas, tú te apoyas a una carretera.  con todo respeto, creo que estés añadiendo basura, no información.
Alvarado2510 (2020-07-29 01:15:00+00:00): Buenas noches, te paso nuvevamente el link:

https://web.archive.org/web/20111213131353/http://www.asamblea.gob.pa/APPS/LEGISPAN/PDF_GACETAS/1990/1998/23664_1998.PDF

para responderte la otra pregunta, la gran mayoría de ríos o quebradas nacen en la cima de cerro o montañas.

si gusta separo el peak del river, si es lo que consideras incorrecto.
mariotomo (2020-07-29 13:52:32+00:00): un link a un documento de 376 páginas no es una referencia aceptable, lo entiendes?
mariotomo (2020-07-29 14:09:23+00:00): no entiendo.  el documento dice una cosa, y tú haces otra?  tardé tiempo para encontrar que la la frontera entre el corregimiento Hato Jobo y Quebrada de Loro está en la página 276 de tu documento.  ahí dice "Desde la cota 671m en el Cerro Mitu, localizado al Oeste del Cerro Gallina, se sigue en línea recta al nacimiento del Río Juay".  cuál parte no entiendes?
SomeoneElse (2020-08-01 00:31:42+00:00): Hello Alvarado2510,

You have provided two large PDF documents as your sources here.  If you are importing data from those then you need to make sure that the licence is compatible with OSM, and that the quality is good enough to map from.  These safeguards are discussed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import .
In some recent changes you've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7712229073 which is a peak, and apparently has a road going exactly across it (unlikely, but possible I guess) and a river starting exactly there too (clearly impossible)
Please don't add rubbish to OSM like this; other people will need to clean it up afterwards.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-08-01 00:32:07+00:00): Hola Alvarado2510

Has proporcionado dos documentos PDF grandes como fuentes aquí. Si está importando datos de esos, entonces debe asegurarse de que la licencia sea compatible con OSM y de que la calidad sea lo suficientemente buena para mapear. Estas salvaguardas se analizan en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import.
En algunos cambios recientes, ha agregado https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7712229073, que es un pico, y aparentemente tiene un camino que lo atraviesa exactamente (improbable, pero posible, supongo) y un río que comienza exactamente allí también (claramente imposible)
Por favor, no agregue basura a OSM como este; otras personas necesitarán limpiarlo después.

Atentamente,
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.
Alvarado2510 (2020-08-07 23:48:31+00:00): Buenas noches, corregí, segun el documento 23664, gaceta oficial de la ley panameña que delimita los terminos politicos de la comarca Ngabe Bugle, que alla oviado algunos detalles con respecto a la Ley, pido disculpas, tengo comunicacion con el equipo de OSM del país, ellos me informan cuando cometo esto errores, para corregir, mejorando su presentacion real en OSM.
mariotomo (2020-08-08 01:12:38+00:00): has considerado la parte que te repito?
»En algunos cambios recientes, ha agregado https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7712229073, que es un pico, y aparentemente tiene un camino que lo atraviesa exactamente (improbable, pero posible, supongo) y un río que comienza exactamente allí también (claramente imposible) «
mariotomo (2020-08-08 02:26:46+00:00): this user's typical answer: not to the point.
Alvarado2510 (2020-10-09 04:03:06+00:00): El documento fue redactado en 1998, no tengo imágenes de ese año en Bing ni Esri.
El camino de seguro fue trazado en el siglo XXI
Supaplex (2020-07-16 13:51:45+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Frans S (2020-07-14 14:45:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please map complicated buildings more accurate by following the outlines,
You map the sometimes to easy as just a rectangular
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-07-22 09:53:42+00:00): Hello Patricia,
Please try to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key in the editor
Best regards and keep mapping
crispytaffy (2020-07-14 02:34:48+00:00): I added some Areas and Points in Tokiwa Park.
pza (2020-07-14 04:08:19+00:00): I'm not sure this is correct.  These node changes aren't on the actual crossing with the road, and even if they were they are the wrong type.  They should be highway=traffic_signal, not marked. The correct "crossing" nodes appear to be correctly labelled already.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87949945
pza (2020-07-14 04:27:36+00:00): This crossing was previously set to bicycle=dismount in line with the signs in the area from Westconnex which are in line with with https://www.westconnex.com.au/media/ketdddwh/rozelle-interchange-rozelle-lilyfield-and-annandale-construction-update-july-2020.pdf
ortho_is_hot (2020-07-14 07:19:43+00:00): Does the crossing have bicycle lanterns? If so then cyclists are legally allowed to ride across. Otherwise dismount is inferred
aharvey (2020-07-14 12:24:41+00:00): Agreed with what ortho_is_hot said, the crossing would only be bicycle=designated if there is a bicycle light usually next to the walking/stop man light.
Glassman (2020-07-14 05:33:40+00:00): TIP: A footway would be the equivalent of a sidewalk. I think you mean path which we also call a trail. OSM uses British English for tag names since OSM was started in the UK. Can you update the trail to highway=path?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87950164
rskedgell (2022-03-17 12:04:02+00:00): The cycleway and crossing you added at the Lampton Road/Bath Road junction have just been deleted by @BorekSigar in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118424018

As they already have form for deleting extant objects, I doubt the features have really been removed, but I won't have time to get over that way to check any time in the near future.
MacLondon (2022-03-17 15:01:57+00:00): I can see that you've now resolved this issue.
rskedgell (2022-03-17 15:24:38+00:00): I have. They claimed not to have deleted the cycleway (!), so I undeleted those ways.
user_5359 (2020-07-14 06:38:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the area https://www.osm.org/way/83076496/history. Why did you chnage the amenity value from school to yes?
-James- (2021-11-15 13:29:01+00:00): What source of data?
Pitoresker Pi (2020-07-21 12:29:03+00:00): Warum hast du diesen Weg als access=customers gekennzeichnet? Der Parkplatz war Ende 2019 noch als öffentlicher Parkplatz beschildert (mit Parkscheibenregelung werktags von 8-18 Uhr). Dementsprechend sollte der Parkplatzweg doch für die Öffentlichkeit zu betreten sein und nicht nur für Kunden, oder?
sh_sc03 (2020-07-21 12:32:33+00:00): Okay, das war mir nicht bekannt. Dann ändere ich es wieder.
Pitoresker Pi (2020-07-21 12:55:17+00:00): Dann ändere Daten (bzw. füge Daten hinzu) doch bitte nur dann, wenn du die Situation tatsächlich kennst.
user_5359 (2020-07-14 06:31:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
maposm (2020-07-15 21:11:26+00:00): Hallo Klaus H Ibisch und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Du hast hier den "Computerl@den" hinzugefügt als "shop=electronics" [1]. Falls der Laden - wie es der Name vermuten lässt - wirklich nur Computer (oder auch Zubehör / Software) verkauft, wäre hier "shop=computer" [2] passender. 

Ein "shop=electronics" sollte ein breites Sortiment verschiedener Elektrogeräte (z.B. Fernseher, Radios, Kühlschränke, Waschmaschinen, Computer, ...) anbieten.

Nur so als kleiner Hinweis...

Viele Grüße
maposm


[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop=electronics
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop=computer
VitalieS (2020-07-14 21:33:38+00:00): Bună și bun venit pe OpenStreetMap. :) Felicitări cu prima modificare.
Vă recomand să adăugați ”Strada”, ”Bulevardul” ”Stradela” la denumirea drumului.
cralexandru11 (2020-07-14 21:47:18+00:00): Mulțumesc mult pentru ajutor, o să fac rectificări.
VitalieS (2020-07-14 21:35:18+00:00): Bună. Cărei localități aparține această zonă rezidențială ? Zona actuală poată denumirea de „Vile” (ru: Дачи).
cralexandru11 (2020-07-14 21:46:40+00:00): După câte știu îi aparține satului Suruceni.
wislander (2021-05-09 23:14:40+00:00): Hi ArtOfTheTrek_Sayyed,

What do you mean by "field experience" as a source? Did you personally hike these trails? 

I know that the Mount Stuart trail is a serious climb requiring some level of expertise and specialized equipment, which puts it well above T1. Several of the others also seem unlikely to be T1, based on terrain and trail names like "scramble".

Regards,
wislander
Pitoresker Pi (2020-07-20 21:54:49+00:00): Hi, ich halte das von dir gesetzte "access=private" für unangebracht. Der Herbertshof ist mit Verkehrszeichen 250 (Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art) und Zusatzzeichen "Anlieger und Radfahrer frei" ausgeschildert. Dementsprechend genügt zur Darstellung der Zugangsbeschränkung bereits die Kombi "vehicle=destination" mit "bicycle=yes". Oder warum hast du das "access=private" hier gesetzt?
sh_sc03 (2020-07-21 05:33:27+00:00): Ich habe den Access=Private gesetzt, weil der Herbertshof in privater Hand ist und dem Besitzer die Wegerechte gehören.
Pitoresker Pi (2020-07-21 11:54:16+00:00): Auch wenn die Straße in Privatbesitz ist, ist hier keine Beschilderung on-the-ground vorzufinden, die ein "access=private" rechtfertigt. Der Besitzer scheint nicht-motorisierten Verkehr zu dulden, bzw. sogar ausdrücklich zu erlauben (siehe "Radfahrer frei"-Beschilderung). Es versperrt ja hier auch kein Tor/Schranke o.Ä. den Weg, sodass ein Betretungsverbot offensichtlich wäre.

Nur weil ein Weg in Privatbesitz ist, ist nicht unbedingt ein "access=private" in OSM angebracht!
VitalieS (2020-07-14 21:37:35+00:00): Bună. Forma folosită cel mai des în Republica Moldova e „Strada Frunze”, fără abreviere.
VitalieS (2020-07-14 21:44:04+00:00): Bună. Doar prima parte a drumului se numește Mihai Eminescu sau până la capătul din partea de sud a satului ?
cralexandru11 (2020-07-14 21:45:11+00:00): După câte țin minte toată strada, o să verific deja mâine pe cadastru si o să fac rectificări, mersi mult!
Nakaner (2020-07-14 08:01:33+00:00): Hi,

could you please give a proper reason for this change?

Best regards

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87957807
branib (2020-07-16 10:41:23+00:00): Hi Michael,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have modified the highway tag with starting segment  as service and the remaining road to parking aisle as it is  leading to the parking lot. Please correct me if I am wrong and it  requires any further modifications. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks&Regards,
Branib
nickvet419 (2024-11-06 01:59:06+00:00): Access=destination Indicates that traffic is not allowed, but anyone may still use it to reach a destination that can not be reached otherwise. which is NOT what this residential road is used for.  the contraflow greenways have no restrictions to traffic and should have no access tags restricting navigation.
nickvet419 (2024-11-06 01:59:53+00:00): further reading for access tags https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2024-11-06 15:20:52+00:00): Hi, nickvet419! 

My name is Yuliya, and I am the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft. 

As indicated in the comment on the changeset, the tag was introduced as part of the Mobility During COVID-19 initiative to restrict through traffic (https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/cdot/supp_info/covid-mobility.html). Currently, the tag is no longer pertinent. We greatly appreciate you bringing this to our attention and removing these irrelevant tags. Additionally, we will reassess the relevance of all other tags we have implemented. We apologize for not coming back and removing it timely.
Best regards, Yuliya
ken17 (2020-07-16 19:33:19+00:00): Hello Adam. Thanks for the updates. Just one question. Are you tagging some of the roads as "National Forest Development Road XX"? I have a hard time following the history, so I am not sure exactly what all changed. I use to always tag them that way but that terminology is not use by the Forest service any more and not recommended by OSM. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#National_Forest_Road_System. There is another reason I like the newer terminology. The old name was long enough that the number would get clipped off the name in some renderings of the map data. That is just for what it is worth. Thanks again for your updates and have a good day.
Adam Schneider (2020-07-16 19:51:40+00:00): I freely admit that I didn't know that the "long form" name was discouraged in OSM, but I can definitely get on board with just using "Forest Road"! The only reason I've been changing them TO the N.F.D.R. nomenclature is for the sake of consistency, since the majority of existing roads are named as such. Next time I'm messing around with forest roads, I'll do some search-and-replace operations to shorten the names.

(I don't like the "Forest Highway" recommendation on that page though; I've never seen or heard the USFS use that term. I also think it makes a lot more sense to use "NF" for all the ref tags, not just the big roads.)
Adam Schneider (2020-07-28 18:45:55+00:00): FYI, I did eventually go in and clean up the Malheur NF roads according to the Wiki guidance (changeset 88214814).
ken17 (2020-07-28 22:47:36+00:00): Thanks Adam. It looks good. I hope you are doing well.
RobChapple (2020-07-14 07:12:05+00:00): Seen Comment on other submission about abbreviations on street names. Will correct the street names to not include abbreviations.
RobChapple (2020-07-14 07:13:36+00:00): from 87957139
azakh-world (2020-07-15 07:29:23+00:00): Hi.
After your alignment two coastline ways got intersected. I suppose such error can occur if one moves features without downloading surrounding objects. Please be careful since valid coastline is crucial piece of map data.
This the screenshot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/n3tst739oojz2q9/Coastline_changeset_87959012.png?dl=0
PiedmontPark (2020-07-16 18:26:28+00:00): Hi Kazakh-world, I’ve reviewed this area and the fix has been made by another user. I’ll make sure to keep this in mind going forward.
nw520 (2020-07-15 22:06:33+00:00): Hallo FahRadler, du hast ein Segment des Leinpfads als highway=cycleway getaggt. Dies bedeutet, dass das Segment primär für Fahrräder ist, also i.d.R. mit Zeichen 237 (Fahrrad auf blau) ausgeschildert ist und insbesondere, dass Fußgänger nachgeordnet sind. Da der Leinpfad meines Wissens nach für Radfahrer und Fußgänger gleichberechtigt ist, würde ich dich bitten das Segment wieder als highway=path zu taggen. Durch bicycle=yes und foot=yes wird bereits verdeutlicht, dass beide gleichberechtigt sind; diese Kombination entspricht Zeichen 240 bzw. 241 (gemeinsamer/getrennter Geh- und Radweg).

Falls du nicht meiner Meinung bist, so antworte bitte hier in der Änderungssatzdiskussion.
Parzelle13 (2020-07-16 06:49:34+00:00): Siehe Diskussion Änderungssatz 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87560632
GoodClover (2020-07-14 11:13:56+00:00): How exactly does this footpath cross Peony grove?
I would assume it just joins with it as that is what it does elsewhere, but you seem to have missed a section.
I think you used iD (in-browser-editor) so when you select the footpath it should give you a list of options of what you can do.

Thanks for contributing to OSM!
Harry Wood (2020-07-16 15:56:30+00:00): Ah nicely done fixing this old note! https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/921178
Hungerburg (2020-07-15 09:53:12+00:00): Hallo Bruno, Steige wie dieser und der im Gschnitztal werden in openstreetmap als "path" eingezeichnet, ich weiß dass das im Editor unglücklicherweise "Mehrzweckweg" heißt, aber "Gehwege" mit blauer Tafel mit Mann und Kind sind das keine ;)
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-07-26 15:27:32+00:00): Hallo Guido,

Bedankt voor je bijdrage aan buurtnatuur.be/OpenStreetMap.

Ik heb dit als 'bos' aangeduid en het stuk speelweide van de Hortensialaan als 'park' aangeduid.

Zijn er nog relevante zaken?

Mvg, Pieter
Luzandro (2020-07-18 04:56:47+00:00): Hallo Reiner,

ich nehme an, das layer=-1 beim Fußweg in der Passage ist falsch und dieser ist nicht wirklich auf der gleichen Ebene, wie die Parkgarage

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826084876

LG Andreas
ReinerMeyer (2020-07-18 12:14:34+00:00): Ja, danke, das stimmt.
Ich werde layer=-1 wegnehmen. Der Fußweg in der Passage ist ja auf dem gleichen Level wie die Straße.
Lg Reiner
flohoff (2020-07-14 18:14:35+00:00): Moin,
ein andere Mapper hat das hier schon korrigiert dir aber scheinbar nicht geschrieben. 

Das "name" tag dient nur den Eigennamen, nicht als Beschreibung. 

D.h. das kann "Otto-von-Bismarck-Haus" sein oder eben "Annette-von-Droste-Hülshoff-Straße". Beschreibendes wie Pferdestall sollte da nicht rein.

Bei OSM werden die dinge über die Tags beschrieben. D.h. building=stable hat jetzt hier ein mapper korrigiert. Damit ist klar das das ein Stall ist.

Deine description ist völlig in Ordnung.

Also schön das du mit machst ;)

Flo
Frans S (2023-08-07 13:06:48+00:00): About tagging of highways
Please read and follow the tagging rules on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
or
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Groen St Gillis (2020-07-14 08:41:01+00:00): Dit park bestaat uit enkele speeltuigen en wat bankjes en ligt in een binnengebied. Het is helemaal niet duidelijk vanop de straat dat er hier iets is. Ik ben toevallig voorbij gewandeld en de deur stond open en ik hoorde het geluid van spelende kinderen.
Supaplex (2020-07-16 13:57:42+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
tyr_asd (2020-08-26 08:18:07+00:00): Hey, thanks for contributing to OSM. I have a few questions/suggestions:

* Please note that "permit" is not a valid value for the access restrictions. Use "private" or some other documented value instead. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

* Is "Giovanazzi" really the name of the building you modified?
Cascafico (2022-04-14 07:06:55+00:00): da sopralluogo, la rotatoria è inesistente
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87965785
SomeoneElse (2020-08-01 10:58:09+00:00): Hello,
Could you please use more meaningful changeset comments rather than simply "fix"?  That really doesn't help people to understand what you have changed here.
Changeset comments can be in any language that you are familiar with.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-08-01 10:58:33+00:00): 你好，
您能否使用更有意义的变更集注释而不是简单的“修复”？ 这确实并不能帮助人们了解您在这里所做的更改。
变更集注释可以使用您熟悉的任何语言。
最好的祝福，
安迪