piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-02-10 16:15:52+00:00): boa tarde, pode explicar o motivo de ter eliminado estes edifícios e a descrição do conjunto de alterações não refletir a acção que você tomou nesse conjunto de edições.

Aguardo resposta.
trial (2020-04-05 12:16:21+00:00): This part without stop but with 2 ends seems to be wrong or experimental too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8592409#map=18/52.08584/-4.65250
Brian de Ford (2020-04-05 12:43:44+00:00): I'm lost.  The relation you link to is the full 408 route with many stops and is a circular with no ends.
trial (2020-04-05 17:54:45+00:00): That's why I included the map information, not only the relation. But while lost you gave me a hint ;-): 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=52.08602&lon=-4.65254 returns two experimental segments:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10688682#map=18/52.08584/-4.65250
(without stop there, is it wanted?)
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10688754#map=18/52.08584/-4.65250
Should the normal full route have those experimental parts? Isn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5141249791 missing for the segment 5?
Brian de Ford (2020-04-05 18:59:38+00:00): Ah, that bus stop.  It used to be a marked bus stop.  I vaguely remember a shelter there, many years ago.  It's not there any more, not even road markings.  But the bus does usually stop on the opposite side of the road.  I'll fix things.

To see how all the segments fit together, http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/408x_416444#14/52.0859/-4.6712  If you're not familiar with uMap, it will probably give some error messages when it makes repeated overpass queries to get the segments.  Zooming in and out may or may not get missing segments to appear.  Then click on the eyeballs at bottom-left to turn off all the segments, then turn segments on one at a time to make sense of the route.
trial (2020-04-05 21:18:00+00:00): Yes compared to this mess, the RER C around Paris (https://www.transilien.com/lignes/rer-trains/rer-C) is straight forward!
If the routes are stable enough, you can get the result of the Overpass queries and store them in the uMap, it will avoid the time out issue you have (you may be also tune the timeout you may have in the overpass request, not sure here, I haven't done dynamic Overpass requests recently).
Did you try https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Public_transport_examples to laugh at? ;-)
DaveF (2020-02-10 22:13:49+00:00): Hi
Before making amendments, especially id tall buildings, to be ware of 'parallaxerrors' & that the aerial imagery is accurately aligned with objects that are close to the ground ie roads.
You've moved this, & other objects ouit of alignment.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=19/51.45939/-2.58273
Note it is using the same editor & background imagery as you were.

.
ndm (2020-02-10 22:31:21+00:00): The changeset comment is next to useless -- what did you change?
ndm (2020-02-10 22:32:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332983392 no longer matches ESRI clarity.
user_10734764 (2020-02-10 22:32:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for the headsup, what is the best way to align the aerial imagery?
ndm (2020-02-10 22:38:50+00:00): Cabot Circus is dragged badly https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8903084#map=18/51.45927/-2.58238 you can see parking entrance roads are at odd angles.
ndm (2020-02-10 22:40:49+00:00): There's some wierd geometry near https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80803209#map=19/51.46106/-2.57720
ndm (2020-02-10 23:14:48+00:00): A lot of the map is drawn from different imagery -- some of it is no longer available -- all has varying quality and offsets and parallax issues. Some mappers draw "to the roofs" -- some to the ground -- if there's no parallax there's no difference -- but can be significant if parallax is present.

If you're looking at an area that's already been mapped then aligning imagery to what's already present (maybe multiple times) can reduce the number of changes.

If you're determined to move stuff then consider all connected items -- just moving a subset can cause problems.

See how it's rendered after the changes. Fix it if you break it -- or undo it -- or ask for help.
ndm (2020-02-12 21:15:22+00:00): Reverted problematic edits
ndm (2020-02-10 22:45:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/618601186#map=19/51.46612/-2.58457 no longer matches ESRI clarity
ndm (2020-02-10 22:47:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668771054#map=19/51.46700/-2.58378 no longer has a smooth wall/street
ndm (2020-02-10 22:48:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564470886#map=19/51.46989/-2.58089 no longer has a smooth wall/street
ndm (2020-02-10 22:49:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625567210#map=19/51.46729/-2.57694 no longer matches ESRI clarity
ndm (2020-02-10 22:53:49+00:00): Other changes look harmless / useful cleanup.
ndm (2020-02-12 20:46:58+00:00): Reverted problematic edits.
mapper999 (2020-02-23 09:01:28+00:00): Hello Brecht,
there are construction works on the bridge, but it can still be used by buses and emergency vehicles, it is also possible to drive to the Luxhof parking, so highway=construction is not correct here. The access rights were set correctly, so there should be no routing over the bridge.
Brecht Van Maldergem (2020-02-24 09:57:39+00:00): Hi Mapper999,
Thanks for your feedback.
My modifications were based on the fact that the bridge will be closed for a longer time (cf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1657123).
If I understand correctly, you do agree.
However, the construction site isn't that big as I indicated (cf Luxhof parking)?

The highway:construction tag seems to be correct to my opinion?
cf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction

Thanks for feedback!
mapper999 (2020-02-24 18:37:55+00:00): Hello,
the situation is a bit difficult here: There are construction works on the bridge, so therefore the road has been closed for general traffic until 2022 (access=no). Nevertheless one lane of the road can still be used by small buses and emergency vehicles (e.g. to access hospitals in Speyer), there is a traffic signal controlled alternating oneway on the bridge.
To still allow routing for these vehicles, setting highway=construction would be wrong.
It is also possible to access the Luxhof parking for all traffic ("Zufahrt frei").
On sunday whb has added the traffic signals and barriers and I changed it to highway=unclassified, which comes closer to the current importance in the road network, so it should be mapped ok now.
ndm (2020-02-10 22:57:59+00:00): There's a bad drag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496196928 -- don't think alll the nodes got moved -- original probably nearer ground truth, paralax in imagery.
ndm (2020-02-10 22:59:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471983747 -- probably not a square building -- doesn't match ESRI clarity
ndm (2020-02-10 23:02:03+00:00): Rest is probably ok.
ndm (2020-02-12 20:29:22+00:00): Reverted problematic edits.
joost schouppe (2020-03-06 13:09:52+00:00): Hoi Ruben,
Je hebt hier (net als bij 32 andere fietsenparkings de tag bicycle_parking=gent meegegeven. Da's nogal vreemd. Wou je meegeven dat deze beheerd worden door de Stad Gent? In dat geval kan je beter operator="Stad Gent" gebruiken.
Ruben Van de Velde (2020-03-06 18:21:09+00:00): Nee, deze fietsenrekken zijn (zoals de meeste in Gent) van het type "Gent", zoals bijvoorbeeld te vinden op http://www.camflex.be/nl/type-gent-604.htm
joost schouppe (2020-03-07 17:14:07+00:00): Ha, ok, dat verklaart veel!
Ik heb even in de chat gepolst, en Escada en L'imaginaire gaven aan dat het misschien eenvoudiger is om voor bicycle_parking=rack + rack_type=gent te gaan. Op die manier blijft de categorisering van de fietsenrekken toch iets of wat eenvoudig, en kan je toch nog meer detail meegeven.
Ruben Van de Velde (2020-04-20 11:27:53+00:00): Mij eender; op dit moment jammer genoeg geen tijd om verder op te nemen.
eggie (2020-02-10 16:14:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-10 16:17:59+00:00): Beste rocky.. Svp niets aan gebouwen veranderen ook al lijken ze niet helemaal goed te staan.
Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het kadaster en precies ingemeten. 
Een luchtfoto vertekent. Wanneer je naar de dakranden kijkt lijkt het altijd of gebouwen ergens anders liggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-10 16:22:26+00:00): De gebouwen heb ik weer hersteld naar kadasterdata.
Gr Eggie
🚂🚂🚂 (2020-02-13 22:58:57+00:00): Please state this at every object whether it's from CanVec.
carpbunker (2020-02-14 13:29:58+00:00): It was added on the change set note.
viloan (2020-02-10 16:08:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
dvdhoven (2020-02-10 17:43:42+00:00): Met Potlach kun je geen routes wijzigen. Dan komt de route uit de volgorde te liggen. Potllach mikt standaard de toegevoegde wegen achteraan en dat is meestal, zo ook in dit geval, de foute plek.
Beter kun je mij een seintje geven, dan zet ik het er wel in. Nu doen we dubbel werk, niet echt nuttig.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
HJS_Holten (2020-02-11 11:26:05+00:00): Beste Dick,
Ik heb je reactie aandachtig gelezen. Op het scherm zag de wijziging er prima uit. Ook in de app OSMAND+ en de site Waymarked trails. Dus ik dacht dit is een relatief eenvoudig aanpassing dus dat ga ik zelf aanpassen. Het echte probleem zie ik nog niet maar ergens anders gaat het dan blijkbaar fout. Dus ik zal de volgende keer weer een "opmerking" plaatsen op de kaart en dan kunnen de echte specialisten (zoals jij) doorop inspringen.

Sorry voor het ongemak.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Henk Stoevenbelt
Holten
dvdhoven (2020-02-11 11:46:13+00:00): Het probleem is, dat in een route de wegen exact in volgorde moeten liggen. En wel in de volgorde van laag knooppunt naar hoog knooppunt. Potlach en ook ID voegen altijd aan het eind toe, dus als je ergens middenin wegen weghaalt en anderen er voor in de plek toevoegt, dan komen die nieuwe wegen onderaan te staan.
In Waymarked Trails zul je dat niet zien, dat klopt en ook niet op de Fietskaart.
Je kunt het wel zien in knooppuntnet.nl
https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/overview en in JOSM. De site knooppuntnet.nl geeft ook waarschuwingen als er volgorde fouten optreden.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
iWowik (2020-02-23 19:53:33+00:00):  Рад приветствовать вас в проекте!
Я заметил, что вы рисуете домики и к тому не пишете на названии улицы слово улица, а также  пишете в название населенного пункта (addr:city) что-то непонятное (сельское поселение), а также, что делать не следует.

Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их сложно найти, чтобы понять где на карте какой адрес нужна карта или схема.
К тому же у различных карт и планов есть правообладатели и без их явного разрешения данные в OSM вносить нельзя.
Целью проекта является сбор данных, свободных от претензий других лиц, поэтому данные, вносимые без разрешения их владельцами могут в какой-то момент быть удалены из проекта.
CupIvan (2020-02-10 16:39:08+00:00): уточните пожалуйста, откуда вы берёте информацию по контурам зданий?
mavl (2020-02-22 05:24:14+00:00): Здравствуйте, Валентина 252.  
Пожалуйста, напишите, из какого источника были взяты адресные данные?
MKnight (2023-09-11 11:29:38+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier an living_street maxspeed=30 angefügt. eins von beiden kann nicht stimmen
müllers (2023-09-11 15:06:43+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis ---> Fehler beseitigt.
Eine schöne Woche
ftrebien (2020-02-21 21:49:02+00:00): Legal a atualização. Só um detalhe: aquele trecho da Riachuelo está somente com acesso local (motor_vehicle=destination)? Se sim, não poderia ser via terciária (coletora), que é um tipo de via de passagem.
Alexandre de Menezes (2020-02-21 21:54:34+00:00): A notícia linkada não fala em acesso local, mas em liberação parcial.  Mesmo assim, vou ajustar a classificação.
user_5359 (2020-02-10 19:51:41+00:00): Is "palmer Engineering" a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
user_5359 (2020-02-10 19:52:19+00:00): Sorry: I forgot to say : Welcome to OSM!
ageber01 (2020-02-10 21:15:57+00:00): it is an office of a private company.
mueschel (2020-02-13 18:20:54+00:00): Hi,
what does 'healthcare:test ' mean? This tag is not used in any other place.

Thanks!
mapbeks (2020-02-14 06:28:30+00:00): Oh Im sorry it sorry I was try to use health_service:test=yes refering to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0
mueschel (2020-02-14 09:02:14+00:00): Interesting. This tag wasn't used before. This proposal is partially outdated, because of the tags defined in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare
are partially overlapping. But I don't see any replacement for this tag you used here. Most likely there is something, but it doesn't seem to be documented well.
mikko_tamura (2020-02-14 09:47:26+00:00): Honestly, I am having a hard time finding tags that can be used for my HIV facilities tagging that I have been doing. So I should use health_service:test=yes or should I remove it?
mueschel (2020-02-14 09:54:42+00:00): We do have about 500x 	 disease:hiv = yes
used on hospitals offering any hiv related service.
There isn't a documentation in the Wiki for it.
mikko_tamura (2020-02-14 09:58:59+00:00): yeah actually Im the one doing it. Before I tagged the laboratory and the counselling differently but I was advised by the local OSM community here to merge it to the actual facility as it may confuse people to think that there are 2 clinics or laboratories within the hospital. I am really sorry. I actually plan to go back and edit all the 500+ since these are duplicates  that have been uploaded and just looking for the perfect tagging system. Honestly, I also dont know how to document or the actual process of doing it for OSM. There are more or less 400 more hiv centers I havent uploaded. Do you happen to have a telegram account so as we can continue our correspondence there. :)
mueschel (2020-02-15 08:42:41+00:00): The best place to start is to just write a page in the Wiki - you can prefix the page name with your user name to make clear that this (for the moment) is some "private" documentation, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mapbeks/Clinics
Once you have this in a state you like, you can post a message e.g. on the tagging mailing list, asking others for comments.
Warin61 (2020-02-26 00:06:57+00:00): Your definition of a riverbank says there is no vegetation growing in it. Yet this river bank has vegetation between the riverbanks...
SOSM (2020-02-12 18:37:52+00:00): Hallo ruedu43, und willkommen bei OSM. 

Ich denke bei diesem Edit war wohl nicht der Sinn ein Freiluftladen einzutragen :-). Wenn du den Laden an den Umriss eintragen willst (alternativ hättest du das einfach als ein Punkt im Umriss machen können), dann musst du die Gebäüde Eigenschaften am Umriss sein lassen.

Gruss
ruedu43 (2020-02-20 10:37:16+00:00): Hallo SOSM, danke für den Kommentar. Ich hätte wohl zuerst mehr über die Möglichkeiten/Anforderungen lesen sollen, statt gleich loszuschlagen. Das werde ich jetzt nachholen. Und ja, die Flickstatt ist kein Freiluftladen, das werde ich noch zu ändern versuchen.
lmagreault (2020-02-11 21:16:48+00:00): Bonjour,
Si il s'agit d'une armoire de rue, rajouter 	
man_made=street_cabinet et street_cabinet=telecom. L'opérateur n'est pas directement Orange mais sa filiale BFC Fibre.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80807008
viloan (2020-02-10 17:06:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
tux67 (2020-02-11 06:18:57+00:00): Hallo LukeSVK,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Du hattest um ein Review gebeten. Die Verbindung zur  Straße ist so korrekt umgesetzt.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Du solltest aber auch immer beim hochladen eine Quelle deines Wissens angeben.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80807991
woodpeck (2020-02-19 15:37:44+00:00): Dieses Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771382668 ist nicht auf dem angegebenen Luftbild "ESRI World Imagery" zu sehen. Welche Quelle wurde hier tatsächlich verwendet?
mutz-11 (2020-02-20 08:18:55+00:00): Wahrscheinlich habe ich genau diesen Umriss aus Maxar Premium. Leider kann ich das im Moment nicht verfizieren, da der Dienst aktuell nicht erreichbar ist.
woodpeck (2020-02-20 09:37:03+00:00): Erstens hat Maxar Premium am 10. Februar, als Du diese Änderung gemacht hast, in JOSM nicht funktioniert und zweitens ist dieses Gebäude auf Maxar Premium nicht zu sehen. Welche anderen Quellen verwendest Du?
mutz-11 (2020-02-22 09:32:46+00:00): Ich verwende die Hintergrundbilder, die mir von JOSM angeboten werden kombiniert mit dem, was ich von einem Besuch des Ortes noch erinnere.  Falls für dich am diesem Tag Maxar nicht funktioniert hat, ist in meinem etwas Gedächtnis durcheinander geraten oder auf deinem Computer wurde etwas anderes angezeigt als auf meinem. Da ich während meinen Edits keine Kamera mitlaufen lasse, kann ich jetzt nicht mehr definitiv klären, was ich wo gesehen habe und schon gar nicht kann ich dir etwas beweisen. Worum geht es dir? Existiert dieses Haus nicht und habe ich irgendeine Kontur auf dem Bild falsch interpretiert?
viloan (2020-02-10 17:26:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
tanonin (2020-04-07 08:43:52+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez fait des modifications sur une ligne électrique aux environs de Saône 25660, mais j'ai l'impression que vous vous basez sur des données antérieures aux données précédentes,quelles sont vos ressources pour ces corrections?
Eric V (2020-04-07 08:56:43+00:00): Bonjour
C'est très possible, je me base sur l'imagerie dont je n'ai pas la date de prise de vue.  Merci de corriger si c'est leger ou je m'en chargerai si je sais quels elements il faut remodifier

Bonne journée
viloan (2020-02-10 17:28:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2020-02-10 20:22:16+00:00): Dag Brul... Ziet er beter uit zo..!
Gr Eggie
user_5359 (2020-02-10 19:46:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information, in the middle of a highway). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Summit BHC (2020-02-10 20:17:47+00:00): How is it spam!! I am simply trying to enter missing business locations. The location has about ten buildings as you can see on the map. The gate to enter is just before the end of the road, hence why it was placed where it was.
user_5359 (2020-02-10 21:13:17+00:00): Recently, a lot of spam entries have been created, which only consist of the keys name and description. This is not information that can be evaluated meaningfully. 

OSM is interested in address information (at least addr:street and addr:housenumber), contact information (for example phone, website, email) and business descriptions like craft, healthcare, office, shop. Details about the values can be found in the OSM Wiki. 

By the way, an access block is also entered as a node on the way with barrier=gate, access=private.