piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 20:12:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:46:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_3216889 (2017-04-17 17:55:18+00:00): Welkom op OSM

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
user_3216889 (2017-04-17 17:56:32+00:00): Een gesloopt terrein is geen park. Er gaat ook weer nieuwbouw plaatsvinden.
Wijziging wordt ongedaan gemaakt.
joeri_024 (2017-04-17 20:36:59+00:00): Maar ook duidelijk niet bebouwd op dit moment, dus om de wijziging alleen maar ongedaan te maken is ook te makkelijk. Er groeit nu overduidelijk gras (die optie had ik helaas gemist, vandaar dat ik voor park had gekozen).
user_3216889 (2017-04-17 20:48:48+00:00): Als er een begin wordt gemaakt met herbouw kun je het gebied markeren met landuse=construction. Als er voorlopig niets gebeurt, maar alleen wild spul groeit kun je natural=scrub gebruiken. Maar markeer dan alleen de stukken tussen de straten, en maak e.e.a. niet vast aan straten.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:18:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:24:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:18:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:18:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:38:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:09:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Hjart (2017-04-17 16:00:20+00:00): Jeg havde ellers lige fjernet navnet "Strib skole" fra flere bygninger idet det normalt er bedst kun at have det på den omgivende polygon.
Morten Lind (2017-04-17 16:04:28+00:00): Det kan du have ret i. Jeg har ikke læst vejledning, og syntes dog også det blev lidt mange forekomster. Jeg skal korrigere det.
Morten Lind (2017-04-17 16:12:00+00:00): Det havde du så gjort. Tak for det. Jeg fjernede navnene på bygningerne på Strib Skole SFO, børnehaven Kastanjeborgen og Vestre Skole; som jeg alle tidligere havde tilføjet.
Hjart (2017-04-17 16:14:01+00:00): Ja, jeg nåede at rette det igen inden du svarede første gang.
Men tak fordi du lytter :-)
Hjart (2017-04-17 16:54:43+00:00): Og tak for dine bidrag til vores projekt iøvrigt
Morten Lind (2017-04-17 19:42:56+00:00): Du har ca. 200 gange så mange editeringer på OSM som mig, så det må vist være mig, der bør takke dig, for din indsats til vort projekt :-)
Hjart (2017-04-17 19:56:53+00:00): Jeg startede med simpelthen at have for meget tid at gøre godt med, og så da jeg efterhånden indså hvor afgørende min indsats for projektet var, fik jeg jo blot ekstra blod på tanden :-). Nu håber jeg dels at kunne holde rimelig styr på datakvaliteten + ikke mindst være med til at opdyrke et større korps af faste bidragsydere. Det tager selvfølgelig tid, men det sniger sig derhen ad :-)
Morten Lind (2017-04-17 20:10:08+00:00): Det er rigtig godt at der er nogen der er vedholdende, og bliver til "kernefrivillige", netop for at sikre kvaliteten. Jeg har ambitioner om det samme, men det bliver bare til noget "hit-and-run"-editering, som jeg håber på ikke er af alt for dårlig kvalitet. Jeg har ofte tænk på, om der findes en hurtigvejledning for "light"-mappere som mig. Det ville sikkert hjælpe en del på den samlede kvalitet, og begrænse den tid som kerne-mappere skal bruge på at rydde op. Kender du til sådan en vejledning?
Morten Lind (2017-04-17 20:10:50+00:00): Hvis du er på Jabber, så kontakt mig gerne. Jeg har Id moli@jabber.dk.
mueschel (2017-04-20 10:40:59+00:00): Hi, 
you tagged some buildings with "building:wall" and "building:roof". I replaced these tags with the common building:material and roof:material keys. These are in use in many places and are defined in the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
hbrown14 (2017-04-20 13:51:21+00:00): Hi - Thanks! I feel so silly about this tagging mistake. I'll be sure to fix the remaining tag mistakes in this area.
Sudie
Polarbear (2017-06-21 23:29:30+00:00): Du hast das Haus https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272458024 gelöscht, in Kurze Str 1+1a, ist es abgerissen?
Zu Öffnungszeiten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272425188) lies bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
- wenn du unbedingt private Pools mappen willst, füge bitte access=privat hinzu, sonst komme ich morgen schwimmen :-) Und bitte nicht jede mobile Kinderplansche, die man zufällig im Luftbild sieht.
kurg (2017-06-22 19:14:43+00:00): Hallo Polarbear,
das Haus habe ich wieder eingetragen.
Die Öffnungszeiten sind laut Wiki korrigiert.
Pools habe ich nur feste im Erdreich verankerte eingetragen und als private gekennzeichnet.
Danke für Deine Hinweise.
Supaplex (2017-04-17 16:55:50+00:00): 用Overpass Turbo，然後用Level0編輯器批次改會比較快
Raymond Wu (2017-04-18 03:18:01+00:00): 我再研究看看，謝謝 S 大大
geoaria (2017-04-18 14:18:57+00:00): سلام 
نقشه کش عزیر ، لطفا در مورد ویرایش های که در نقشه انجام می دهید در بخش کامنت ، حتما علت ویرایش و علت حذف و افزودن موارد را دقیقا بنویسید.
علت حذف مسیر در این ویرایش شما چه بوده است؟
poornibadrinath (2017-04-19 11:51:17+00:00): Hi MagnusHeart,
  I came across your edits and noticed you deleted a building visible in the imagery. Can you please explain why was that building deleted? It's clearly seen in the imagery. I have reverted your changes and added that building again. Please be careful while editing and do not unnecessarily delete the features that is seen on the imagery. If you are deleting then a valid reason of why that edit was made would be very helpful for everyone to understand. Thank you and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Happy Mapping :) 
Best,
Poornima
user_3216889 (2017-04-17 18:30:07+00:00): Telefoonnummer graag volgens internationale notatie (gegevens worden wereldwijd gebruikt):
dus +31 10 2020534
Martijn_ (2017-04-17 19:03:44+00:00): Is goed, dankjewel voor de info
Dino Michelini (2017-05-02 17:35:26+00:00): Ciao ho visto che utilizzi spesso il termine "varie" per commentare le tue modifiche. Sinceramente è troppo vago e non aiuta a comprendere il tuo lavoro, Se non lo hai già fatto ti invito a leggere le raccomandazioni per commentare i changeset https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments. Grazie
user_3216889 (2017-04-17 18:43:10+00:00): Als beide panden samen de school vormen, dan beter een lijn trekken rond het hele schoolterrein en die voorzien van amenity=school etc.
Bij speelplaatsen naast de school heeft dat altijd de voorkeur.

Is op nr. 321 alleen het bedrijf gestopt of daadwerkelijk het pand gesloopt? In het laatste geval ook het adrespunt verwijderen.
Martijn_ (2017-04-17 19:01:15+00:00): Bedankt voor de tips :)

Het hele pand is met de grond gelijk gemaakt nadat het bedrijf gestopt is. Ik geloof dat het moest sluiten van de gemeente die "andere bestemmingen" voor het terrein.
tux67 (2017-04-19 10:46:40+00:00): Hi karitotp,

any specific reason to label this as natural=scrub? these are artificial grass areas inside a city park. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

BR
Stephan
karitotp (2017-04-19 18:00:57+00:00): Hi Stephan,
According to the satellite imagery and according to the relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6266866) that looks more like a natural=scrub and not as a park as it was labeled before, besides it is inside another park.
Regards.
tux67 (2017-04-19 18:47:35+00:00): Regarding the Park inside a Park you're correct and this change recent change seemed to be entered by a new (Pokemon?) mapper and is wrong. 

Nevertheless the previous and now again used natural=scrub is wrong here as well. 

Please tell me how you would tag a man made, short cut  lawn inside a park area? 

I guess local ground knowledge beats remote satellite mapping as usual.
Have a look here to see more pictures of the area taken on the ground level:
https://www.duesseldorf-tourismus.de/en/sights/parks/suedpark/

As this is 50 Kilometers away from me .. let me ask a local guy to finally judge on this.

BR
Stephan
Athemis (2017-04-19 20:57:43+00:00): Hi all,
to give some insights from someone who literally just lives some minutes away from that place: The "Volksgarten" is a man-made park, though designed to be close to nature. Imho is perfectly fine to just tag it as leisure=park. As far as I can tell, the natural=scrub relation, originally added by another local mapper, was created out of the desire to somehow distinguish lawns from bushes in the data (or even in the redered map). But technically that's wrong  imho.
Regards,
Alex
karitotp (2017-04-19 22:24:06+00:00): Thanks for your comments. You are right, local knowledge is better, please feel free to change the tag with whatever is more convenient.
Regards, 
Karito
tux67 (2017-04-20 14:08:43+00:00): ok, thanks .. Athemis will pick up the topic with the local user community.

BR
Stephan
chnav (2017-04-25 06:46:35+00:00): Hi, please do not change highway status in kazakhstan. Will review all ypur changesets in KZ.
mavl (2017-04-17 16:58:58+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 47832185.
MiroJanosik (2017-04-20 05:44:55+00:00): Ahoj, myslim ze nie je spravne ze cely chodnik 486560828 ma oznacenie ako 'crossing', asi si to chcel dat iba na mensi usek chodnika.
ratrun (2017-04-21 15:05:49+00:00): Sorry, I do not understand your language. Please write in German or English.
MiroJanosik (2017-04-21 18:13:59+00:00): Hello, I think that it is not correct that whole sidewalk 486560828 is marked as crossing. As written at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=crossing?uselang=en-US - it should be a path lying on the road that is connecting two sidewalks.
MiroJanosik (2017-04-21 18:15:22+00:00): But never mind that - I will fix it right away, now.
MiroJanosik (2017-04-21 18:20:27+00:00): Ok, changed.
ratrun (2017-04-22 12:21:13+00:00): Thank you. Anyhow it was not me who added the crossing tag. All these sidewalks are mapped badly as they are missing the shared crossing points with the roads on the crossing. It means that they are mostly useless for foot routing. From my perspective it would be bettter to add sidewalk tags to the highway=residential without separating them.
MiroJanosik (2017-04-22 23:30:43+00:00): I agree, but missing crossing points are probably valid in this situation, as they look like a small streets with low traffic, so there are no pedestrian crossing symbols.
Bonix-Mapper (2017-06-23 01:12:29+00:00): TheOzzz,

Esta forma de mapear está errada. Você pegou cada quarteirão e criou um único edifício no local.

Por acaso esta área está na minha lista de importação, conforme anunciado na wiki.

Solicito a remoção da edição na forma em que está.

Obrigado.
literan (2017-04-18 10:15:49+00:00): Здравствуйте! правильный формат адреса - "addr:housenumber=3 с1", без точки и с пробелом перед "с". Я исправлю здесь.
acsd (2017-04-17 17:24:17+00:00): Не нужно дублировать номер дома в название объекта
eggie (2017-04-18 07:06:41+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-18 07:06:13+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
mw67 (2017-05-10 08:38:39+00:00): Hallo, wieso entfernst Du Punkte aus den Multipolygon welches das Naturschutzgebiet Fichtelberg bilden?
fell3 (2017-05-10 10:37:01+00:00): Das wird ausversehen passiert sein.
bridgeconst (2017-04-21 11:28:41+00:00): По факту осмотра местности я добавил забор от угла склада 16с4, который примыкает к забору на территории военного университета (Пакет правок #47999658). Забор Линия: 487489609 не должен примыкать к зданию 14с4. Там есть проход. Получается еще и контур территории университета надо потом откорректировать.
literan (2017-04-21 12:38:48+00:00): Не совсем понял... Проход принадлежит университету, и между проходом и 16 с4 есть забор? В общем, лучше если вы сами отрисуете)) Я туда попытался сунуться, но меня не пустили
bridgeconst (2017-04-21 14:32:46+00:00): Я из под браузера редактирую, JOSM не установлен. Не могу "отцепить" контур территории университета от зданий и заборов (пока неопытен )) ). Обрежьте, пожалуйста, забор - Линия: 487489609 от здания 14с4 до точки моего забора. Таким образом получится проход за угол 14с4. Судя по всему 16с4 - это склад театра. Я могу и сам сделать, если скажете как отцепить контур от зданий
literan (2017-04-21 15:00:49+00:00): вообще, университет - это мультиполигон, он образован как раз из линий зданий и заборов. Почитайте в вики, это по-любому надо осваивать)) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F_-_%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BD Я сделал в районе дома 14 с4 границу универа отдельной линией, гляньте.
bridgeconst (2017-04-23 14:11:41+00:00): Спасибо за наводку. Я подкорректировал забор и контур территории
Dr Kludge (2017-04-27 14:14:46+00:00): jimbo333, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.  Those are some great first edits.  Please keep up the good work!
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-04-18 02:40:59+00:00): Hello ridixcr, I could not help but notice that you had altered an edit that I had made a few days ago (the same edit that I had made prior)

the edit that is of concern to me is in regards to the 'lanes:forward' designation I had applied which you had removed in this particular changeset

I was hoping that you could explain to me why it is that you felt compelled to remove the 'Lanes:forward=2' designation that I applied to that road(?) it is a key that I tend to use quite often
ridixcr (2017-04-20 17:01:46+00:00): Hi  Diógenes de Sinope!

I read your comment on this change, I will send you more details on why you remove this tag, check your Imbox.
luiswoo (2017-04-18 12:07:25+00:00): Мне проще через http://overpass-turbo.eu/ скачать границы сельского поселения и леса в нём, и обрабатывать в границе поселения, в общем, моё дело предложить.
пс там есть "помощник".
eggie (2017-04-17 20:26:58+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”


Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-17 20:28:33+00:00): Je edits worden bekeken. Je zet landuse grass om in Leisure park. dat is niet de bedoeling.
Ze zullen worden teruggedraaid.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47881053
eggie (2017-04-17 20:29:22+00:00): Als je nog vragen hebt kun je gerust reageren.
eggie (2017-04-17 20:29:30+00:00): PB gestuurd
eggie (2017-04-18 07:03:51+00:00): reverted
highflyer74 (2017-04-22 10:44:10+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

Wenn Du einen POI (Point Of Interest) wie z.B. das Rathaus oder ein Geschäft hinzufügst, solltest Du gleich das Gebäude, in dem sich die Einrichtung befindet, zeichnen. Auch sollte man näher bezeichnen, um was für ein Geschäft es sich handelt (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop).

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AWikiStart) ans Herz legen.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB,

Oliver
FredrikLindseth (2017-04-17 18:40:58+00:00): "Updates and details at Haukeland" was the changeset comment suposed to be
eggie (2017-12-21 08:29:29+00:00): alsnog Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
BCNorwich (2017-04-18 13:06:08+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for your addition to the OSM database. Unfortunately you were not aware that the original section of way could be separated and renamed. Placing a second way atop the original way inadvertently created a duplication of ways. I have separated that section of Pychard Way and removed it, thus leaving your new Fowler Avenue in place. Abbreviations are considered not best practice in OSM so I've also expanded Ave to Avenue. Regards
mdcambridge (2017-04-18 14:42:16+00:00): Many thanks! (I had only one thing to edit!), but there is more: Fowler Way actually extends to the left and parallels Dobson Way. It is also inaccessible like parts of Dobson Way due to construction. I will try to find the name of the road running roughly N/S that parallels pychard, which is also under construction and inaccessible. All roads are supposed to be open by September.
highflyer74 (2017-04-20 08:43:48+00:00): Hallo Salvatore!

Wenn Du ein Objekt mit fixme=* bearbeitet hast und das bestehende Problem dadurch erledigt ist, kannst Du das fixme=* entfernen. Ein fixme=* ist nur ein Hinweis an andere Mapper, daß hier noch etwas zu tun ist (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fixme). Ich hab's jetzt entfernt. Viele Grüße!
eggie (2017-04-22 11:56:22+00:00): 
Na 10 jaar weer begonnen met mappen.. dan toch nog een welkomstmail. Wellicht heb je wat aan de bijgevoegde links.

 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-22 11:57:59+00:00): Een bollard. motor_vehicle=no houdt op de afgeleide kaarten geen autoverkeer tegen. Je zult dan een stukje van de weg op slot moeten zetten met motor_vehicle=no.
Mumbly (2017-04-22 12:35:38+00:00): Bedankt voor het opnieuw welkom heten en de terugkoppeling over de bollards. Ik zal ze binnenkort nog een keer langslopen om te zorgen dat er ook een stukje weg op motor_vehicle=no komt te staan.
Romainbou (2017-06-27 17:02:51+00:00): Bonjour,
J'aimerai te signaler une erreur, il me semble, dans la correction osmose que tu as faite sur un monument historique.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4414673467/history#map=19/43.94708/4.80994
C'est pour le node 4414673467. Il a été tagué "historic=castle" alors que ça n'est pas du tout un château, c'est un immeuble de ville.
De plus, attention à ne pas faire de trop grands changeset concernant une multitude de choses qui n'ont rien à voir entre elles, ça rend très difficile à lire les historiques. :)
Merci de me confirmer par retour de commentaire que je peux supprimer ce tag historic=castle.
JeaRRo (2017-06-28 08:06:53+00:00): Bonjour,
je sais très bien qu'un Hôtel au sens historique n'est pas un Château mais je n'ai pas trouvé de tag plus proche et si tu le supprime osmose va produire une erreur : "Missing object kind". Donc si tu ne peux pas proposer un tag plus précis, je suggère de laisser en l'état.
cordialement
JeaRRo
http://wom.jearro.fr