piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kevin Kofler (2019-12-29 22:49:28+00:00): The issue is that you have made this change without any regards to the local situation. It is just not appropriate to tag tram stops (and other small halts, for that matter) as stations, even if a (hybrid) light rail line happens to use the infrastructure. It is semantically wrong (it contradicts the definition of the English term "station", a stop is not a "station" in English) and it also makes those stops inappropriately prominent on renderings (including the default one, which shows them like subway stations).

Something like Wien Westbahnhof is definitely a station. Something like Taubstummengasse can be called a station as well (it is a subway station and rightfully tagged as such). Something like Mayerhofgasse is NOT a station. It is just a stop on the road where tramways and the WLB (which is legally a tramway line on that city segment) stop.

If there is some validator that complained about the previous tagging, then you need to get that validator fixed, not tag for the validator.
Kevin Kofler (2019-12-29 22:57:33+00:00): I consider even railway=halt inappropriate for the stops from Oper, Karlsplatz up to and including Bahnhof Meidling (the tram stop on Eichenstraße – there is an actual station Wien Meidling next to it). They should be tagged as regular tram stops because that is what they are.
Kevin Kofler (2019-12-30 01:20:52+00:00): I think that it is generally not appropriate to make this kind of tagging change in a foreign country without knowing what the situation on site looks like.
Kevin Kofler (2019-12-30 01:51:35+00:00): I fixed the tagging of the stops in the tram section: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78994155

Please do not change it again.
Kevin Kofler (2019-12-30 02:09:58+00:00): See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badner_Bahn
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-12-30 23:41:32+00:00): I counterargument:
* Wikipedia says 36 stations, not stops.
* According to OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dtram_stop):
* "[...] It is used on tram tracks (railway=tram) and also on light rail tracks (railway=light_rail) where the halt ressembles more a tram stop than a railway halt (railway=halt)." Why  railway=halt is inappropriate in some "stations".
* For a hybrid route between light rail and tram, why is the WLB relation is maintained as route = light_rail?
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-12-30 23:57:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dlight_rail This articles lacks of information about hybrid light rail/tram transport. 

> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Stationen_der_Lokalbahn_Wien%E2%80%93Baden
When you quote "Mayerhofgasse is NOT a station", I saw another article on Wikipedia and it says station in German language. And that is the problem about the "station" term for OSM. By the way, I am using the maps.me validator (https://github.com/mapsme/subways) that verifies if the stops are linked to a station. I will leave the message for the team to read and find a consensus.
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-12-31 00:00:13+00:00): Sorry for some inconvenience in writing, but I had to give an opinion on my participation.
Kevin Kofler (2019-12-31 00:00:36+00:00): > Wikipedia says 36 stations, not stops.

That is probably due to the use of a generic template that does not distinguish between stations and other stops. It might also be a mistranslation of the German "Station", which actually means "stop", not "station". If you actually ever went to those stops, you would not call them stations. (At most, you can argue the 3 UStrab https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_pre-metro tunnel stops to be stations. But not the non-tunnel ones.) The German Wikipedia actually calls the tram stops "Stationen" or "Haltestellen" (both terms meaning "stop"), never "Bahnhöfe" (stations).

> According to OSM Wiki […]

The wiki actually proves my point:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dhalt
"For a tram stops on railway=tram and railway=light_rail systems the tag railway=tram_stop should be used."

And in all those cases, the halt definitely does resemble more a tram stop than a railway halt. It even says "Straßenbahnhaltestelle" ("tram stop") on the sign. See this picture of the stop Mayerhofgasse: https://zurpolitik.com/2010/08/19/wider-den-rad-mangel/img_7295b/

> For a hybrid route between light rail and tram, why is the WLB relation is maintained as route = light_rail?

Because there is no such thing as a "route = light_rail_tram_hybrid".

Again, I kindly ask you to stop making this kind of tagging changes without discussing this with the local community and without knowing how the situation looks like on site.
Kevin Kofler (2019-12-31 00:04:09+00:00): > I saw another article on Wikipedia and it says station in German language.

Beware: "Station" in German ≠ "station" in English. The German term for "station" is "Bahnhof", not "Station".

(With the exception that we usually call a subway station "U-Bahn-Station" rather than "U-Bahn-Bahnhof" or "U-Bahnhof". But a tram stop is neither a "Bahnhof" in German nor a "station" in English.)
Kevin Kofler (2019-12-31 00:06:24+00:00): (And even the "U-Bahn-Station" exception is mostly an Austrian thing, Germans actually use the term "U-Bahnhof".)
Kevin Kofler (2019-12-31 00:13:48+00:00): (PS: The obvious drawings on the picture I linked to are a suggested location for bicycle stands. Obviously, that infrastructure is not actually present on site (which is what the article for which the picture was taken is complaining about). But the tram stop is authentic.)
Rudolf Mayer (2020-01-05 01:28:54+00:00): I definitely support what Kevin says here, and I think this is a bad combination of lack of the local situation, and a lack of the local language (your misinterpretation of "Station" for a tram stop is quite revealing).

Please consult the local community before you do such big changes; it's not that Vienna has very poor OSM coverage of the public transport situation, not at all. If you think something is not according to the standards, please propose what should be changed, and it can be done after a discussion, if deemed correct.
Diego Sanguinetti (2020-01-05 21:04:09+00:00): Thanks Rudolf for a more honest and hopeful answer. You are right that there is a misinterpretation of "station" and it is precisely because the route is labeled "light rail" (for the validaor). It would be correct to declare the route as "tram" because there are tram stops. However, seeing on Wikipedia I found the clearest definition "tram-train" (not to call "hybrid light rail tram"). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tram-train

Unfortunately there is no information about it in OSM. It would be interesting to add a suggestion about this type of route.And I do not mean Vienna, but several routes that lead in the world. For example UK (http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/Rail-News/uks-first-ever-tram-train-launches-in-yorkshire-)
Diego Sanguinetti (2020-01-05 21:07:28+00:00): ...Or Kyoto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10238008 (Some tram stops are stations).
Diego Sanguinetti (2020-01-09 02:19:15+00:00): ...And RIver Line, tram-train, but tagged like light rail with light rail stations (from some tram stops with "station" definition). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Line_(NJ_Transit) PS: I updated this network to this modality for the reasons already indicated at the beginning of this discussion. Which I agree to have a new tag called route=tram-train.
Kevin Kofler (2020-01-09 02:32:36+00:00): The NJ River Line was also tagged that way by you, so it is not a valid example. Just because you already made the same mistake elsewhere does not make it any less a mistake. Do you have any examples of that tagging scheme being used for a tram-train hybrid (in the tram section(s)) by other mappers?

IMHO, this tagging is also wrong for the NJ River Line (because it is inconsistent with the global guidelines in the OSM wiki and with the definition of some English-language terms such as "station"), but it is up to the New Jersey (or US in general) community to decide how they want their local features tagged (so please ask them, and next time ask the relevant local community BEFORE doing such a retagging of already mapped features).
Diego Sanguinetti (2020-01-11 00:30:00+00:00): But with all due respect, what I show about tram-train are proposals (and I assume it is SUI GENERIS for OSM). Maybe this is a "off-topic", and you have the right to say this coment.

I am not the only one, another user is checking if it is correct to keep the tram stops in this relation (in Ukraine): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8765532#map=19/47.88220/33.38318

All this could be solved if the documentation allowed "tram stop" (or maybe I don't see it, I guess you know better than me Mr Kofler).

PS: I added a note tag in route master about this discussion. I would appreciate it if you DON'T EDIT it because you would save foreign mappers to understand why the route is "hybrid."
Diego Sanguinetti (2020-01-11 01:18:46+00:00): * DON'T DELETE this note
Kevin Kofler (2020-01-11 01:43:25+00:00): Why would I delete your note from changeset 79439495? It is informative. I don't delete useful notes.

As for the documentation:

* railway=tram_stop:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dtram_stop
"It is used on tram tracks (railway=tram) and also on light rail tracks (railway=light_rail) where the halt ressembles more a tram stop than a railway halt (railway=halt)."
Only the tracks matter, not the relations, and in this case, we are actually on tram tracks. In addition, even if the tracks were light_rail tracks (which they are not), railway=tram_stop would still be correct because the stops actually "[resemble] more a tram stop than a railway halt".

* railway=halt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dhalt
"For a tram stops on railway=tram and railway=light_rail systems the tag railway=tram_stop should be used."

So I don't see what is not documented.
goodidea (2020-08-19 18:24:06+00:00): Du hast da am Südring Überwege eingezeichnet, wo gar keine sind... Auch geht da kein Bürgersteig-Weg weiter rechts (stadteinwärts)... ich ändere es heute noch...
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-12-25 00:49:36+00:00): Node for Entrepeneur Bank in Calamba accidentally deleted. Restored here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78834103
Leo Slager (2019-12-25 00:58:29+00:00): Het ziet er nu prima uit:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=78834112
multimodaal (2019-12-25 01:10:09+00:00): Dank voor de scherpe blik en het speurwerk naar de schuldige changeset (-:
Leo Slager (2019-12-25 12:05:16+00:00): Dan zou die functie "vervangen geometrie" wel eens de schuldige kunnen zijn. Die neemt dan alle vastgeplakte elementen mee naar de nieuwe positie.
user_5359 (2019-12-25 17:01:15+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kleiner Hinweis: Eine Hausnummer ist kein Name. Bitte sieh Dir die neuste Version Deines Objektes an, um die Adressnotation zu kennen zu lernen.
Kovoschiz (2019-12-25 12:11:33+00:00): Won't it be better to map the actual `man_made=bridge` instead of doing this to the `highway=*`?
Carnildo (2019-12-31 17:09:31+00:00): Thanks for the addition.

It's better to put address points on the actual building than on the street: this way, more sophisticated routers can do things like say "your destination is on the right", or find a walking route that involves fewer street crossings.

It's easy to do: simply start editing, right-click on the address point, and select "Extract" (the third item from the top of the menu).  Then move the point to the correct location and click to set it down.
literan (2019-12-25 18:18:10+00:00): Добрый день. Более правильно ставить скорость maxspeed=RU:urban. Тогда, если макс.скорость в городах понизят до 50, не придется вручную все исправлять
bye12 (2019-12-25 18:32:18+00:00): Why was this parking aisle changed to private?
vissushm (2019-12-26 10:14:04+00:00): Hi,

As according to the board at exit/entry ,I have assumed it as a private property. However, reverted it under the changeset 78875167
Please let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
vissushm.
bye12 (2019-12-25 18:32:23+00:00): Why was this parking aisle changed to private?
vissushm (2019-12-26 10:12:50+00:00): Hi,

As according to the board at exit/entry ,I have assumed it as a private property. However, reverted it under the changeset 78875082.
Please let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
vissushm.
chnav (2019-12-26 05:36:00+00:00): Удалённые здания восстановлены. Здания надо исправлять, а не удалять.
chnav (2019-12-26 05:41:21+00:00): Алма-Атинская область сейчас отрисована ужасно, но если каждый новичок будет постоянно удалять-перерисовывать - может потеряться полезная информация, а карта так и останется недоделанной.  

Уважайте труд предыдущих маперов.
angys (2020-01-06 14:30:05+00:00): Hello, Jalan Sungai Pinang is not a dual carriageway based on my last visit, please revert your edit, thank you. Dual ways are only for roads that have obstacles in centre that separate two direction.
Anandkrishna M S (2019-12-25 05:57:27+00:00): olee poi pani idukadaa
pitscheplatsch (2019-12-25 10:57:56+00:00): Hi Nikhil Babu,

please use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=77028950

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
marc__marc (2020-11-28 21:30:11+00:00): Bonjour,
La douane postale est-elle un bureau de poste de la firme publique La Poste ?
ou c'est un service de dédouanement ?
Abn_976 (2020-11-30 07:19:48+00:00): Bonjour, 
C'est le centre de dédouanement de la firme publique de La Poste.
Cordialement.
marc__marc (2020-11-30 20:46:02+00:00): Donc ce n'est pas le bureau de poste ?
L'Opendata de a poste dit qu'il y a un bureau de poste ZONE INDUSTRIELLE DE KAWENI, MAMOUDZOU mais aucun des 3 candidats ne correspond
l'un est rue de la poste mais hors de la zone industrielle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234424797
l'autre est chronopost qui est la filiale axé colis https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4993093186
et le 3ieme est le centre de dédouanement dont on parle.
le site de laposte situe lui le bureau Avenue de la poste quasi au rond-point mais il est connu pour être imprécis.
Savez-vous ce qu'il en est ?
mueschel (2019-12-26 12:56:27+00:00): Please don't use OSM to store private and sensitive information like the number of people, children or elderly living in a residential building. A world-wide and public database like OSM is not the right place to store information like this.
mavl (2019-12-25 16:13:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были взяты адреса?  
  
Также обратите внимание, что в России действует соглашение об именовании улиц:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
mueschel (2019-12-26 12:51:36+00:00): Please don't use OSM to store private and sensitive information like the number of people, children or elderly living in a residential building. A world-wide and public database like OSM is not the right place to store information like this.
user_5359 (2019-12-25 07:57:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Subil Kumar (2019-12-25 06:18:56+00:00): poli
chnav (2019-12-26 05:23:07+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы удалили много объектов. Пожалуйста ничего не удаляйте без основательной причины и без объяснения в комментарии к changeset.

Правка частично откачена.
chnav (2019-12-26 05:23:50+00:00): Пожалуйста не пишите статусные части в названиях, типа "остановка".  

Кавычки также не нужны.
Arun Madhavan (2019-12-25 08:03:16+00:00): thanks for the submissions, may be the building outline top can be more accurate, zoom and trace it more accurately
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78838796
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 00:06:14+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 10476990 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
chnav (2019-12-25 13:10:27+00:00): Пожалуйста не пишите описательные названия, у нас правила не такие, как в викимапии. "Лесок у реку" удалён.
chnav (2019-12-25 13:13:11+00:00): То что вы в детстве строили там шалаши... тоже удалено.
user_5359 (2019-12-25 07:53:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dstudio. I move your node to the right building.
Ali Zangeneh (2019-12-26 08:27:21+00:00): سلام هادی جان داداش شما که مغازه خودت رو ثبت کردی اگه لطف کنی برای مغازه ها و ساختمونهای اطرافت نوت بذاری یا ثبت کنی ممنون میشم. ضمنا مغازه شما رو به جای پوینت با ریلیشن ثبت دقیق کردم یعنی دقیقا همون ساختمون که میبینی تبدیل شد به مغازه شما
Bierphysik (2024-09-10 10:55:03+00:00): Hi. Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31823818 wurde anno 2021 mit access=no getaggt, ist aber in der Taunusklub Wanderrelation 071 enthalten - was stimmt?
Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (2024-09-11 09:50:03+00:00): Hallo Bierphysik, ich ändere die Relationen & habe den Access-Eintrag nicht (oder versehentlich) gemacht. Da ich nicht weiß, welche Beschaffenheit der Weg hat, kann ich dazu nichts sagen. Aber den access=yes, darfts Du gerne setzen. Es stimmt die Relation des 071.
Bierphysik (2024-09-11 16:29:43+00:00): access=yes wäre sicherlich nicht korrekt ;) - ich frage mal denjenigen der access=no getaggt hat
Bierphysik (2024-09-11 16:31:27+00:00): siehe diksussion hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104410891#map=16/50.31965/8.65331
Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (2024-09-12 06:55:08+00:00): Also richtig antworten kann ich Dir erst mit sehr viel Verzögerung, da ich arbeite & nicht immer Zeit habe. Außerdem muß ich in den Unterlagen für Änderungen nachsehen & dann noch den zuständigen Wegemarkierer fragen. Der schaut dann irgendwann mal vorbei, um mir Bescheid zu geben. Du siehst, es dauert eben, wenn ich nicht gerade selber mal hinfahre, was - siehe oben - eben auch nur begrenzt möglich ist. Ich nehme es mit auf meine Liste.
Bierphysik (2024-09-12 07:25:20+00:00): alles easy, kein stress, das ist ja schon seit 3+ jahren so ^^
Taunusklub | Stubenkaterin (2025-01-13 06:22:33+00:00): Hey, wir waren gestern dort oben (& hatten auch etwas Schnee ;-)). Der Weg ist nicht gesperrt. Den Access habe mal auf "yes" gesetzt. Somit ist dieser Vorgang abgeschlossen.
Bierphysik (2025-01-13 11:58:19+00:00): Achtung: access=yes ist sicherlich nicht korrekt, da dies bedeutet, dass JEDES Fahrzeug dort fahren darf. Nimm lieber die foot=no und bicycle=no tags heruas.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 20:11:22+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86062179
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 20:11:25+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86062179
maraf24 (2019-12-30 15:20:47+00:00): bus stop i duplikat
maraf24 (2019-12-30 15:20:36+00:00): bus stop
jmaspons (2020-09-28 16:08:07+00:00): Pot ser que la cova dels Trabucaires estigui mal ubicada? He estat voltant per allà i no l'he trobat i mirant el mapa topogràfic de l'ICC, sembla que la ubica al graó del cingle de baix
rieder (2020-09-28 16:59:47+00:00): Tens tota la raó, ara ho modifico. Sembla que la ubicació és a la part de sota del cingle. A sota tens el millor track que he trobat a wikiloc. Si llegeixes la descripció comenten com arribar-hi

https://www.wikiloc.com/hiking-trails/pont-valenti-la-quera-can-barrufa-pas-del-gamarus-cova-dels-trabucaires-la-tuta-dels-morts-st-aniol-7017823
maraf24 (2019-12-30 15:20:24+00:00): bus stop
save2desk (2020-05-25 14:01:25+00:00): А surface=sand не ты указывал?
Artyom K (2020-05-25 14:03:42+00:00): Нет, только геометрию уточнял и добавлял новые с типом "Тропа".
hfwri (2020-02-17 17:56:39+00:00): is not oneway
Kovoschiz (2019-12-25 12:20:31+00:00): Hi, a name should not be added for these. You can put it in `description=` if you want. Also, next time you can add `entrance=yes` to the end of the footbridge connecting to the two buildings.
Rom1 (2019-12-26 20:47:09+00:00): Hi, please, could you stop removing the node of the pharmacy in front of the building ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7083764865
Thanks.
user_5359 (2019-12-25 16:37:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2019-12-25 11:30:24+00:00): Dag Rik.. Een barrier=bollard houdt per default gewoon motorvoertuigen tegen. Je hoeft dat niet te taggen.
Wel is het handig om moped en mofa=yes te taggen omdat OSM routing deze tweewielers als motorvoertuigen ziet.
(Mits ze daar langs mogen natuurlijk)
MVG,
Eggie
RicoElectrico (2019-12-25 11:44:49+00:00): Cześć, warto by było dodać resztę danych podanych w uwadze.
Kovoschiz (2019-12-25 12:07:16+00:00): Can you please move the `railway=subway_entrance` to the actual side of the building structure area instead of putting an ambiguous node at the center?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78845191
angys (2019-12-25 14:06:39+00:00): I am not a local mapper there, just fixing based on the subway validation tools.
Kovoschiz (2019-12-25 16:09:10+00:00): Oh sorry, the problem is the `=stop_area` relation isn't fixed.
Kovoschiz (2019-12-25 16:09:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78850919
angys (2019-12-25 16:15:56+00:00): No worries, you can help to fix this too.
ma-rt-in (2019-12-27 19:34:42+00:00): Hallo,
hat die Linie 235 auch neue Haltestellen erhalten, oder hast du dich da nur vertan?
vg
ReinholdR (2019-12-29 14:55:51+00:00): Nein, die 235 hat keine neuen Haltestellen bekommen. Bei der Zuordnung der Haltestellen Achtern Höben und Friedrichsruher Weg, habe ich festgestellt, dass sie keiner Linie zugeordnet waren. Daher habe ich die Relation 235 gleich mit gepflegt.
maraf24 (2019-12-25 13:23:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Stereo (2020-09-01 23:22:52+00:00): Ach, hier bist du auch? :)
Juliane Roell (2020-09-03 11:07:03+00:00): Oh yeah! :)
HurricaneGator (2020-04-14 17:37:29+00:00): Hi Javelin1994! I noticed you added a “no_straight_on” restriction (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10477847) preventing access from the trunk link (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187047182) to the primary link (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263777096). I looked at OpenStreetCam (https://openstreetcam.org/details/2093834/318/track-info) dated to March 25th, 2020 and noted that it’s possible to access the primary from the trunk link. Please let me know if you think the restriction is still valid and why; otherwise, I will remove the restriction. Thank you!
maraf24 (2019-12-25 13:23:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Komentarze_zestawu_zmian
maraf24 (2019-12-25 13:31:50+00:00): Takie zdjecia ze StreetComplete jak w https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1889398 można umieszczać w tagu image.
maraf24 (2019-12-25 13:27:46+00:00): Dobrym zwyczajem jest umieszzenie w kometnarzu do zestawi zmian informacji, że edycja odbyła się na podstawie uwagi
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1196995)
Oraz skomentowanie uwagi przed zamknięciem.