piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:45:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

About your mappings. They are accurate and squared. 

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93072181
ivanbranco (2021-12-27 16:17:17+00:00): Hi lockdownguy,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4170408491

can you check it out?
This place have three different values (neighbourhood;hamlet;locality) and an addr:housenumber
user_11418917 (2021-12-27 17:31:58+00:00): Hello ivanbranco,      
Thank you! I have fixed this now in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115436812     
This was done by a mistake I did last year when I merged duplicated nodes and removed the spam nodes in the area. Thank you very much! Keep up the great work!       
Best Regards.
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:43:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess

PS  This is a buildings only project.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93072435
MatthieuMartin (2022-07-31 19:36:42+00:00): Bonjour,

Quelle est la source du nom "Chemin de vide bouteille"? Je ne trouve rien ni dans le cadastre ni dans la base BD Topo.

Cordialement,
binot44 (2022-07-31 20:26:57+00:00): Bonjour, l'information m'a été donnée par un enfant du pays de Sucé sur Erdre : Hubert Jahan. Selon son explication, les terres autour du chemin sont peu profondes et vites labourées et le paysan pouvait boire plus à la fin de son travail.
Cordialement.
Denis Robineau
MatthieuMartin (2022-08-01 19:24:17+00:00): Bonjour,

Ah d'accord :) 
Je me permets juste de le passer le nom en nom local si cela ne vous embête pas : avec le tag loc_name= car plus d'usage local.

Cordialement,
Matthieu Martin

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:loc_name
MatthieuMartin (2022-08-01 19:24:37+00:00): Et merci beaucoup pour votre réponse et rapide !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-14 14:39:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 100992297, 100989735 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid edits, mainly in Iran, following a complaint from the community there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4814 .
Jakka (2020-10-27 07:52:33+00:00): Prima, je hebt standaard soms te veel keuze mogelijkheden. Dit zijn geheugen steuntjes. Niets belet je om andere wel volgens de wiki eraan toe tevoegen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-14 14:39:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 100992297, 100989735 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid edits, mainly in Iran, following a complaint from the community there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4814 .
czubi (2020-12-07 14:52:23+00:00): Meyerstein, oder?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Meyer#Eisenbahn_und_Bergwerke
30m SW steht der schonmal. Bitte such dir einen aus und lösche den anderen, sofern dort nicht 2 stehen. Danke
czubi (2020-12-07 14:52:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5807159003
Balewupp (2020-12-07 15:58:05+00:00): Sorry, verstehe deine Bitte nicht.
Es gibt nur einen M-Stein an der Stelle, wo soll ich was löschen, ich bekomme nureinen angezeigt?
Balewupp (2020-12-07 16:02:57+00:00): ?
czubi (2020-12-07 17:19:08+00:00): Alles gut, du hast ihn schon gelöscht. 
Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8037399278/history
dgitto (2020-10-27 11:49:08+00:00): ciao, se rimuovi il tag "amenity=school" rimuovi la scuola. Una scuola è univocamente determinata da questo tag.
non basta "building=*"
Pensa sempre che OSM è un database, non una mappa! se un utente ad esempio volesse estrarre tutte le scuole della provincia con una query, non la troverebbe se non c'è uno ed un solo "amenity=school"
dgitto (2020-10-27 11:49:44+00:00): per caso sai come si chiama questa scuola?
Gabryoski (2020-10-27 14:38:45+00:00): ho capito, Adesso provo a modificare il tag allora. Inserisco pure il nome.
dgitto (2020-10-27 15:51:45+00:00): Ottimo lavoro. E io mi sono permesso di mettere tutti i dettagli e i contatti, presi dal sito del ministero.
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:42:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93073808
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-14 14:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 100992297, 100989735 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid edits, mainly in Iran, following a complaint from the community there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4814 .
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:42:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.


Ps.  Hallo Koos.  Als je Maxar Premium imagery gebruikt had zag de loop van de rivier er wat anders uit.
Ik stuur dit bericht naar alle mappers die ik vind die Bing als image gebruiken en mappen in IDeditor
Dat zijn er best veel
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93074044
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:37:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93074071
Cascafico (2020-10-27 08:41:55+00:00): Cos'è successo al sentiero che hai cancellato?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93074274
maicolgalante (2020-10-27 16:47:50+00:00): era parziale ... a breve lo farò a piedi e tramite GPX inserisco l'intero sentiero!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93074274
skarabej (2020-11-09 15:08:09+00:00): This (and corresponding ways) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7359659
should be reverted back to highway	motorway_link
JeroenvanderGun (2020-12-03 12:51:52+00:00): OK, changed back to motorway_link
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:36:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93074552
A67-A67 (2020-10-26 23:48:24+00:00): Er is geen afrit Ridderkerk. Dit een afslaande weg in het Knooppunt Ridderkerk. De tekst van de bewegwijzering wordt getagd in de destination-tag op de eerste way na de splitsing.
DUGA (2021-05-01 15:30:17+00:00): What is building=building?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11796496/history#map=18/41.20913/-74.69401
Glassman (2020-10-26 22:53:22+00:00): We typically don't name buildings unless it has a sign with the name. Can you confirm that this house as a sign with Endless Summer on it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93075959
thewellington (2020-10-28 19:27:36+00:00): Nearly all the homes in this community have names on them.  It's a cutesy thing.  Upon arriving, people don't use cars much, mostly walking and biking.  House names seem to take precedent over addresses in conversation.  The rental homes are called by their names as well.  Seems like it should be the norm in this area to use names in OSM too
thewellington (2020-10-28 19:29:26+00:00): Oh and yes, the name is on the front of the house and on a large flag outside the house too
Glassman (2020-10-28 22:33:04+00:00): We discourage use of personal names to safeguard the privacy of individuals. If the house is named then it would be acceptable to name them in OSM.
Glassman (2020-10-26 22:52:19+00:00): Tip: instead of descriptive names, add an appropriate tag. A good place for help with tags is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93076174
ZeLonewolf (2020-10-28 03:21:46+00:00): Hi, it looks like this change broke the town border at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9157671
Jan Wilts (2020-10-28 08:28:30+00:00): Hallo Bas, waarom waren hier de _links volgens jou onjuist? Mvg Jan
85Bas (2020-10-28 11:52:47+00:00): Beste Jan,

Het is lastig de praktijk op OSM in tekst samen te vatten (en dat gebeurt ook te weinig) maar ik ga een poging doen mijn ervaringen en redenatie zo goed mogelijk te beschrijven:

_links worden over het algemeen gebruikt bij een oprit als je a) onherroepelijk (dus pas ná de laatste gelijkvloerse kruising) en b) 'vloeiend' op de aansluitende weg uitkomt. Bij een afrit geldt dit omgekeerd. Ook bij zogenoemde (vrije) rechtsaffers worden _links gebruikt.

De parallelwegen van de Rijksweg komen gewoon gelijkvloers op de Rijksweg zelf uit, zonder uit- en invoegstroken of vloeiende bewegingen. Bovendien moet je bij het links afslaan nog haaks en gelijkvloers de tegengestelde rijbaan kruisen. Deze kruisingen zijn mijns inziens dus niet anders dan een normaal kruispunt van een residential en primary, dus zonder _links.

Ik zie nu pas dat je dit heel recent had aangepast; ik had dus beter op je wijzigingenset kunnen reageren in plaats van de boel direct te bewerken. Zeker omdat mijn hele verhaal gebaseerd is op ervaring en het nergens zwart op wit zo staat beschreven, iets waar ik nu lelijk tegenaanloop ;-). Goed dat je dit aankaart dus. Als je mijn redenatie onzin vindt, draai ik mijn wijziging weer terug.

Nu Nederland redelijk 'af' is op OSM en we ons met z'n allen op dit soort details richten is het misschien niet zo'n gek idee om ook hier afspraken over te maken.

Vriendelijke groet, Bas.
Jan Wilts (2020-10-28 14:59:59+00:00): Nee hoor, het maakt mij niet zo veel uit. Mijn redenering voor het gebruik van een _link is zodra er een pijl op het wegdek aanwezig is met blokmarkeringen maar waarbij er een fysieke scheiding bestaat tussen de hoofdbaan en deze strook. Én waar een ventweg in éénrichting opgaat in een hoofdweg (zoals ik heb getekend op het Hoendiep bijvoorbeeld, in Leeuwarden is dit ook gebruikelijk).

Maar het blijft een lastige situatie inderdaad dat er geen duidelijke regels voor zijn en alles gevoelsmatig moet.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Jan
dgitto (2020-10-27 11:43:54+00:00): I monumenti ai Caduti andrebbero mappati con "historic=memorial".
historic=monument è per cose "monumentali" tipo la statua della libertà ecc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
Gabryoski (2020-10-27 14:41:24+00:00): Ti ringrazio! ancora sono alle prime armi, non è facile, adesso correggo il tiro :)
aharvey (2020-10-26 22:59:22+00:00): Hi, in this changeset you added duplicate streets on top of the ones which were already there so I've reverted this change.
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:28:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93076866
berndw (2020-10-27 08:30:32+00:00): ;-)
limes11 (2020-10-27 08:33:45+00:00): Ich mach das jetzt in kleineren Abschnitten, dann kontrolliert man das besser...
EdLoach (2020-10-28 17:33:41+00:00): Hi. I'm curious why you removed the track that is still visible in aerial imagery. Marking the track as access=private would probably be better, as it is likely to just get added back at some point.
BCNorwich (2020-11-02 08:00:51+00:00): Hi, Thanks for trying to correct the error by adding back a path. Unfortunately this wasn't quite correct. (Please if amendments are needed amend the original mapped features if possible, this keeps the way history.)

I've removed your access=no path and reverted back to the features that were deleted. I tagged the track access=agricultural and  added a gate access=agricultural. fences added back as well. It now looks pretty much like the Bing imagery. If tweaks are needed please do so.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2020-11-02 08:14:04+00:00): Hi, I reinstated this track, tagged it as agricultural, added a gate barrier.
Please amend existing not delete and add incorrect features.

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:28:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93077306
Leo Slager (2022-05-10 20:31:47+00:00): Dag Tuffmoor,
Kom je daar nog wel eens langs ?
wat is de maximale hoogte bij de Burgerking en de McDrive ?
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:17:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93077346
BCNorwich (2020-10-27 07:41:48+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You have requested a review of your this and two other changesets where you've deleted quite a few tracks. These tracks seem to be genuine on the ground features clearly visible on available imagery, I would think also mostly able to be verified by a survey. Thus it's my opinion that these deletions should be reverted to the previous state. I can't think of any valid reason for the deletions, perhaps you could enlighten me as to your reason. 

These tracks can be amended to show agricultural or private status. The gates I can see on imagery can be added as barriers to the tracks. If you need help re-instating the tracks and amending them please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
limes11 (2020-10-27 07:48:17+00:00): Hi, 

wenn das vor Ort als kombinierter Fuss-/Radweg ausgeschildert ist (blaues Zeichen mit Fussgaengern und Fahrrad neben- oder uebereinander), dann wird empfohlen, dies mit highway=path zu erfassen. Vermutlich war das also richtig.

Gruss, Limes
berndw (2020-10-29 13:03:38+00:00): Hi
aus eigener Kenntnis weiß ich, das es ein kombinierter Fuß- und Radweg ist. Es steht beidseitig das schöne blaue Schild mit waagerechter Teilung.
Also bitte wieder zurück nach hw=path mit bicycle|foot=designated ändern
eggie (2020-10-26 20:09:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.



Review,,  De naam van het speeltuintje is niet de straatnaam. Meestal hebben die speelplaatsen geen officiële nam. De straatnaam kan er beter weer af.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-27 09:14:26+00:00): De straatnaam heb ik verwijderd en de speelplaats losgemaakt van de landuse. 
mvg
eggie
Jethron (2020-10-28 04:18:18+00:00): Thanks for the edit and welcome to OSM!
letihu (2021-01-14 20:16:59+00:00): Hallo,
muss diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863898808/history
auf dieser Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246185051/history
sein?
BS97n (2021-01-14 20:31:10+00:00): Ja. Das eine ist die Pipeline selbst, also die Infrastruktur. Die andere ist eine Schneise (man_made=cutline), betrifft also den Bewuchs. Eine Schneise kann es auch ohne Pipeline geben (z. B. als Brandschneise). Andersherum ist nicht überall, wo die pipeline verläuft, eine Schneise in die Vegetation geschnitten. Auf den Feldern hier im Umfeld ist das zum Beispiel nicht nötig.
Paul The Archivist (2020-10-26 22:49:40+00:00): Hi Luke,
Many thanks for your help in updating the map in the Eastbourne area, and adding additional shops etc! Your mapping is very useful to help keep the area up-to-date in OpenStreetMap.

It's just a minor issue but I wanted to let you know that we don't normally add a name tag to landuse areas such as residential landuse areas as a general rule, though there are some exceptions. Generally to include a name tag it should be a landuse which is a distinct named and signed area, like a named industrial estate or an out-of-town retail park. We avoid duplication, so the name of a road for example shouldn't also be added as a name tag on the landuse. We also wouldn't add the name of the local area/suburb/town/village etc to a landuse area, as we already map places separately in OpenStreetMap.

If you've got any questions I'm happy to advise.

Cheers,
Paul
skfd (2020-11-02 10:06:08+00:00): Привет! для улиц лучше заполнять name, name:ru и name:uk. В name должно быть украинское название 😊
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93078779
ItsNickBarry (2020-10-31 18:28:11+00:00): Name is misspelled, and the editor I use will not allow me to update.  Should be: Jugos y Antojitos Alex
spiregrain (2023-01-09 17:21:34+00:00): Hi there.

In this changeset, you added a fixme to r138744: "needs working".   I'm looking at the fixmes in my area - can you remember what you meant by this one, and how can it be resolved?

Regards,
Ken
ma-rt-in (2020-10-27 17:33:08+00:00): Hallo,
warum entfernst du das tag man_made=works und legst das name tag auf die gebäude ohne weitere infos?
vg
friesede (2020-11-04 00:10:09+00:00): Moin, ich erinnere mich nicht mehr im Detail, aber ich meine dass es das Gebäude noch nicht gab, sondern nur die gesamte Fläche/Grundstück. Name hatte ich eigentlich vergeben, der ist hier ja klar. man_made=works kannte ich so noch nicht für Gebäude, macht hier aber durchaus Sinn. habe ich jetzt wieder auf das Gebäude gelegt. passt?
gruß, friesede
Frans S (2020-10-27 14:15:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

btw: this is a building only project
Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93079319
BigBearSquare (2020-10-27 14:54:37+00:00): Got it, thank you for the feedback
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93079319