piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitort (2017-09-22 15:07:48+00:00): The mess is corrected. Please be careful.
rasagy (2017-09-11 11:40:17+00:00): Hey Udayan,

What were you trying to add here? Not sure this is the correct way to add security guards.
GerdP (2017-09-01 05:26:14+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=bridge 
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520288430
I assume you meant highway=track + brige=yes instead?
Also strange:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520288434
Is there a bridge and a ford?
If so, please draw two ways.
steerage250 (2017-09-01 07:25:48+00:00): Thanks Gerd, I hope it is fixed now. There is a bridge in one place, and a ford in the other.
GerdP (2017-09-01 20:47:45+00:00): Please check also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520288439
track or path?
steerage250 (2017-09-02 00:05:05+00:00): also now fixed (maybe now I will remember the right way to do it next time :-))
steerage250 (2017-09-02 04:47:45+00:00): Gerd, how do you spot these errors? I am surprised JOSM didn't tell me "suspicious way type" (or some sort of error message).
GerdP (2017-09-02 06:00:17+00:00): I use the data from taginfo to find untypical values for the highway key:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway#values
Next I use the Overpass  API to download  the objects. When I see that many
of them were created by the same mapper I contact them.
I also started to open tickets in JOSM, without much success so far, see
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/15203#comment:13 and below.
steerage250 (2017-09-02 06:40:32+00:00): wow, there's untypical values on highway to keep you going for a while.  You are obviously a "super-user".  Keep up the good work.
GerdP (2017-09-02 06:46:47+00:00): I will. Thanks for the positive feedback :-)
Canyonsrcool (2017-08-31 22:25:08+00:00): Hi there,
Curious as to where you got the building names from? Have you been to Abu Dhabi? Do you know "TheAverageNomad"? That username has similar changes to yours. Thanks.
chachafish (2017-09-01 02:16:14+00:00): Greetings. I just stepped out and checked. These are still marked with their 700 series names. Where did I get them from? I got them from the one-meter posts placed in front of each building which jut up from the ground identifying each building. The 700 series names predate the new Abu Dhabi initiative of street names and numbers. The Average Nomad is a username I used long ago. Cheers.
mueschel (2017-09-10 10:02:13+00:00): Dieses Museum heißt doch sicher nicht "Museum"? Und dieser Tag macht auch wenig Sinn: "Tabakspeicher = tourism=museum"

Gruß, Jan
RailAir (2017-09-10 15:06:51+00:00): Hallo Jan,
danke für den Hinweis. Ist jetzt behoben.
Gruß, Bernd
dikkeknodel (2018-07-25 10:04:18+00:00): Hi WomoMap,
What does official map mean? This question obviously relates to the other comments I sent in other changesets of yours. Who is the copyright owner of this official map, and do you have explicit written consent to be allowed to use it?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
WomoMap (2018-07-25 12:31:49+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel

Thanks for your input. 

Source knowledge means: I was there and saw it.
Source "Official Map" means: I looked at an official printed map and saw it.

Some questions:

What do you mean by "allowed to use it"? What kind of "use" do you mean?

Thanks for your help.
Regards WomoMap
dikkeknodel (2018-07-25 12:57:20+00:00): Hi WomoMap,
Thanks for getting back quickly. 
I was concerned your only source was the 'official map'. If that official map has a copyright, you are not allowed to use that as input for OpenStreetMap. 
If you see some discrepancy on the official map which you then check locally, or via the allowed imagery (currently DigitalGlobe/Esri/Bing etc.) then it is ok to update. In that case it is clearer if you do not mention any potentially copyrighted info.
Basically you are not allowed to use any other information than the explicitly allowed sources like de imagery by default available in JOSM and mentioned herer [1], and of course the information you gather by going to the location itself. Other information is only allowed if you have written consent, which then should also be publiced at the wiki [1].

So In this specific case there is no problem, since you were there yourself to check it.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Datasources
eggie (2019-10-21 13:14:08+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
philam48 (2017-09-09 10:04:04+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contribution! I've also sent two messages, but just in case they didn't come through, the station tags for the Outer Circle Line are incorrect. They have since been changed back to railway:history=station_site as per the consensus here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations#Stations_and_sites_which_are_not_currently_in_operation
maraf24 (2017-09-23 11:28:00+00:00): To jest przystanek, a nie dworzec.
eggie (2021-05-06 15:42:29+00:00): Hi Jasper.. Why adding name=Meer in Bangladesh ?
That is a Dutch word.
Don't use name= meer, bankje huis..
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2021-05-06 16:11:27+00:00): reverted by changeset #104264133
gendy54 (2017-09-04 00:08:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de ta contribution.
D'habitude j'aurai dit qu'on importe le cadastre au lieu de le décalquer de l'image aérienne, mais le cadastre a l'air tellement décalé et dans les choux...
Sinon les tag addr sont superflus, je l'ai supprimé.
Pense à indiquer la source de tes changements par source=* directement sur les objets ou sur l'envoi des données https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:source
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-09-06 11:38:41+00:00): Tego przejazdu już nie ma po wybudowaniu tunelu.
GerdP (2017-09-02 07:35:27+00:00): Hi!
Please check:
I corrected typo highway=residental
on some ways. Watch out when JOSM 
auto complete suggests this again ;-)
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51662618
R0bst3r (2017-09-01 21:48:53+00:00): Hallo Nico,
ein access=no bedeutet, dass es nicht zugänglich ist, löschen ist zu viel des guten. Kannst du die Höhle wieder herstellen, am besten durch revertieren (http://revert.osmz.ru/).
Viele Grüße
GerdP (2017-09-11 09:19:10+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed that you added addr:place tags in this area. Please check 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288880029
Do you agree this should have name=Hadeed Road like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288879982 ?
highflyer74 (2017-09-01 06:49:22+00:00): Also this POI will now no longer be recognised as a cafe or restaurant. Please make sure to tag it according to the wiki and choose the most fitting tag. Also the name=* is now not correct anymore. If you need help, let me know! (ich spreche auch deutsch, nutze aber englisch, da Dein Browser auf englisch eingestellt ist).
ToniE (2017-08-31 13:02:25+00:00): Hallo paradiseman,

hmm, Du hast des Wegkreuz nun mitten auf die Straße plaziert.
Das dürfte mit der Realität nicht übereinstimmen ;-)

Evtl. hat's der iD-Editor versehentlich mit der Straße "verheiratet"?

Gruß
Toni
27sur26 (2025-03-23 16:22:00+00:00): ¿Estas son las ruinas de El Pintado, o es la planta potabilizadora de agua de El Pintado?
highflyer74 (2017-09-01 06:42:47+00:00): Hello there!

This cafe had been mapped twice (not your fault). I removed this one and merged the data onto the older node to preserve history.

I noticed you added a website to this one. Please be aware that in OSM there are two ways of mapping contact data. This is either website=*, phone=* etc. or contact:website=*, contact:phone=*. The website was already present in the contact:website=* form. It should be decided for either one per object and not be mixed.

As you are editing with "iD" always make sure to have all tags displayed to avoid adding data which is already present.

All the best!
tyr_asd (2017-09-06 12:05:42+00:00): reverted
northernnanny (2017-08-31 13:48:45+00:00): http://www.thenorthernnannyagency.com/
ACS1986 (2017-09-01 10:58:39+00:00): Hi Penny. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. OSM is a map showing what exists on the ground, not a business listings site.. Is there a childcare facility at this location where people can take their children to be looked after? If this is the private residential address which you run your business from, it shouldn't be mapped as a childcare facility in OSM.
Kind regards,
Adam
zors1843 (2017-09-01 09:27:20+00:00): Hi,
Why did you delete al this info ?
Hjart (2017-08-31 18:01:34+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Jeg har lige tilladt mig at tagge Røverkøb her som en farvehandel.
tyr_asd (2017-09-06 12:05:06+00:00): reverted
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
Chris Fleming (2017-08-31 15:13:58+00:00): So we had left this as a Trunk Road rather than as a Motorway as it won't be running under motorway restrictions until October?
GinaroZ (2017-08-31 21:19:45+00:00): Agreed this should be changed back to trunk as I don't think it's officially a motorway on the ground, despite what the source website says?
Chris Fleming (2017-09-05 13:28:24+00:00): I have set this back to Trunk.
Warin61 (2018-11-07 21:57:04+00:00): Hi,
Relation: Munda Biddi trail touring route (7527686) is not a national route. It looks to me like an alternate route to Relation: Munda Biddi Trail (5810814).

I'll change the network to local cycling network. But I think it should also be made part of the Relation: Munda Biddi Trail (5810814) and an 'alternative'.
tyr_asd (2017-09-06 12:04:51+00:00): reverted
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:46:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
tyr_asd (2017-09-06 12:05:10+00:00): reverted
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
tyr_asd (2017-09-06 12:05:22+00:00): reverted
tyr_asd (2017-09-06 12:37:09+00:00): reverted
tyr_asd (2017-09-06 12:05:01+00:00): reverted
harmor (2017-08-31 20:30:22+00:00): Ich denke, hier wären vollständige Reverts sinnvoll, die durch einige kleine Reparaturen nur erschwert werden.
Nakaner (2017-09-01 08:21:25+00:00): Ach, dann revertiert man das halt mit und die guten Änderungen gehen halt flöten. glglgl dürfte aus der früheren ulilu-Diskussion wissen, dass solche verfrühten Reparaturversuche kontraproduktiv sind.
glglgl (2017-09-01 08:54:19+00:00): Stimmt, sorry. Da das die einzige Änderung in diesem Changeset war, ist es ok, ihn mitzureverten.
Hjart (2017-10-14 07:44:39+00:00): Også her har du været uheldig at lave et længere stykke af Tapdrupvej ensrettet mod nord. Her får du selv lov at rette
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2017-10-14 09:57:55+00:00): Tak, 
Ja det var ikke godt.
VictorIE (2019-12-20 18:44:20+00:00): Should this read "Hermann Görtz". (spelled Goertz in English)?
mavl (2017-08-31 16:32:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Объясните, пожалуйста, что добавляет на карту этот пакет правок.  
ДТП - это дорожно-транспортное происшествие?
mavl (2017-09-01 15:29:05+00:00): К сожалению, вы не ответили. Вероятно, это место дорожной аварии. В OpenStreetMap не принято добавлять непостоянные объекты. Смотрите также статью "Проверяемость".  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8F%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C
VasiliyAdv (2017-09-01 15:44:19+00:00): Добрый день. Да, это тестовый объект, который мы создали в рамках демонстрации возможностей работы в инструментарием редактора представителями строительной площадки завода в городе Тобольск. Вполне вероятно, что при запуске проекта автоматизации строительной площадки мы совместно сможем актуализировать дорожную сеть на строительной площадке и рядом с ней. Благодарю за Ваши комментарии.
mavl (2017-09-01 15:47:47+00:00): Всё ясно. Спасибо. Этот объект я уже удалил.
philippec (2019-11-05 19:29:42+00:00): Die weg en de weg ernaar toe is toch privé ?
Er staan bordjes.
pfiers (2019-11-06 21:14:44+00:00): Ja klinkt logisch aangezien dat het privéhuis van de domeinverantwoordelijke is. Ik zal de permissies toen wat naïef gekopieerd hebben. Feel free om aan te passen.
mike140 (2017-09-02 21:35:10+00:00): Желательно старое название оставлять с тегом old_name
mike140 (2017-09-02 21:39:26+00:00): И name:ru может лучше Родниковая?
Pro100_Cepera (2017-09-02 21:56:34+00:00): Возможно и лучше
maro21 (2026-03-30 22:45:18+00:00): Zmapowałeś tutaj przecinkę leśną i linię wysokiego napięcia w jednym obiekcie. One nie powinny być razem, mógłbyś poprawić?
one_half_3544 (2026-04-02 19:55:05+00:00): Hmm, ale czemu nie? Jeżeli są razem w rzeczywistości..
maro21 (2026-04-06 19:03:44+00:00): Wycinka jest obiektem landuse, a słupy i linia energetyczna, nawet jeśli są w tym samym miejscu, leżą tak naprawdę powyżej. Nie ma też w zwyczaju łączyć linii elektrycznych z jakimikolwiek innymi obiektami i takie tagowanie może być problematyczne. Linie napowietrzne nie łączą się fizycznie z innymi obiektami.
one_half_3544 (2026-04-09 20:30:15+00:00): Jaki dokładnie problem powoduje takie tagowanie?
user_5359 (2017-08-31 16:31:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disland for definition of your tag: I suspect misuse of the tag.
neuhausr (2017-09-06 16:55:43+00:00): Hi just a quick note that the correct tag for fitness centres is leisure, not amenity. (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_centre) Happy mapping!
Robert Whittaker (2017-09-11 18:00:26+00:00): Are you sure about the postcode "BH21 2RP" that you've given to this row of Ashbury Cottages? According to Code-Point Open, this postcode is located about 5km away.

(Discrepancy found using http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/location-errors.cgi )
R0bst3r (2017-09-01 21:44:01+00:00): Hallo GCWMR,
kann man durchaus so machen. Tracktype 2 ist auch noch gut gewählt.
Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse (2017-08-31 17:42:56+00:00): Hi TR42,
In here http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6999982 is quite large.  You've tagged it as "natural=heath" but then added a note "using heath tag to represent fell, fell tag doesn't do anything.".  Please don't tag one thing incorrectly as another just to create a particular effect on one particular map - if you think it would make sense for a particular rendering to include a particular tag/value combination then lobby the people looking after that renderer rather than tagging things incorrectly.  Also you've added "FIXME=extent needs checking" - while it's quite usual for OSM to proceed by iteration (less accurately drawn things first, then more accurately drawn things), who exactly are you expecting to fix this up?  Are you personally committing to spending the next month or so on the ground in this corner of Wales (which is what it would need to do the job properly?  If not, then please don't "colour in" huge areas like this - try doing much smaller areas much more accurately.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-04 10:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html
SafwatHalaby (2017-09-13 15:59:14+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM. You removed a parking lot. Is the parking lot gone or is this a mistake?
R0bst3r (2017-09-01 21:40:55+00:00): Hallo Uwe,
wahrscheinlich hast du das Haus umsonst verschoben, denn Bing hat mit den neusten Bildern (glaub seit Juli 2017) einen Versatz von mehreren Metern im Gegensatz zu den alten Bildern oder zu GPS. Schön sehen kann man das, wenn man andere Bilder verwendet, z.B. ESRI, über das Ebenensymbol auf der rechten Seite im iD Editor.
Viele Grüße
muralito (2017-09-01 23:28:05+00:00): Hola Hugo.

El telefono te conviene ponerlo en el formato +54..... que si el numero esta en ese formato se te puede llamar de cualquier celular de cuaqluier pais.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-04 10:39:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html
74523978 (2017-08-31 22:39:09+00:00): I don't understand what you have fixed.
ratrun (2017-09-01 13:22:59+00:00): See the changeset, it is very small. One node was overlapping, duplicated and not connected to "Kotkampplein".The best method I know to look at the details is to try to revert the change in JOSM. You can use the validator and the problem will show up.
woodpeck_repair (2019-02-10 09:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67066316.
zstadler (2017-09-26 12:33:07+00:00): Hi Flayer,
.
Thanks for the update!
.
In this changeset you have changed the ref tag of several ways to "6,70".  Note that OSM used a semicolon(";") when multiple values are needed for a single tag. In this example, "6;70" would be the proper way to make the change you wanted.
.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator
.
I've corrected the tag accordingly.
Flayer (2017-09-26 13:25:11+00:00): Thank you! I'll will use semicolon from now on.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-04 10:39:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html
dvdhoven (2017-08-31 19:14:07+00:00): Wil je geen wegen samenvoegen over routerelaties heen? Dank u
eggie (2018-06-18 09:40:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Meestal zullen dit paden zijn highway=path  .. footway is echt een wandelpad met een bord met aanduiding. dat zal hier niet het geval zijn.
dit was je edit.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51622305
rasagy (2017-09-11 11:43:50+00:00): Hey Ankit,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! OSM follows the principle of one feature, one element — so you should tag either an area or a central node as parking, but not both. Best would be to remove the nodes here, and add the tags to the area itself.
More details here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking
Thanks!
kartonage (2017-09-14 12:15:35+00:00): Hey there, 
I was wondering if this import has been documented according to OSM import guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines)? Recently imported boundaries generated a staggering amount of duplicate ways (http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/graph.png?country=dominican_republic&item=1230). I noticed because missing boundaries were appearing due to duplicate geometries being already removed by other users. But I couldn't find any discussion or wiki for this import.

Cheers
Nakaner (2017-09-03 07:54:55+00:00): Hallo jagdpächter,

die von dir eingezeichneten Fußwege haben eine unnötig hohe Anzahl an Nodes. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, die Geometrien zu vereinfachen und künftig etwas sparsamer zu sein. Siehe dazu auch die Regeln guter Mappingpraxis im OSM-Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Kurven_mit_einer_angemessenen_Anzahl_von_Punkten_einzeichnen, die auch für dich gelten.

Viele Grüße

Michael
eggie (2017-09-13 11:35:01+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
streckenkundler (2017-09-01 08:48:39+00:00): Hei,

wieso hast du denn das residental von Dahme gelöscht, oder was das ein Versehen?

S.
matchman (2017-09-01 09:14:19+00:00): Ich editiere noch - gelöschte edits werden natürlich ersetzt
streckenkundler (2017-09-01 09:16:33+00:00): Alles Klar...
streckenkundler (2017-09-01 09:23:00+00:00): Vermeide es aber mal bitte, Geometrien vollständig zu löschen um sie dann neu zu zeichnen... Ich meine jetzt nicht das verändern wie z.B. Teilen oder Verschmelzen von Flächen. Unnötiges Löschen von Geometrien wird im Allgemeinen nicht so gerne gesehen.

Danke,

Sven
mueschel (2017-09-01 09:23:12+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
In these edits you used two tags which are not common: "rain cover" and "sitting cap".
All our software (maps and other tools) can interpret this information only if common tags are used as they are described in the wiki. I think that "rain cover" should be "covered" and "sitting cap" should be "seats" - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=bench

Could you have a look and change these tags accordingly?

Cheers, Jan
RoterEmil (2017-12-14 09:47:56+00:00): Hello, this seems to be no official name/a private note. I just removed it from the database. However, if it's a common name, it needs to be tagged at the beach (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277247049) itself (without tourism=attraction).
Thank you
aharvey (2019-04-16 02:23:50+00:00): was deleted, no attraction here
SK53 (2017-09-26 15:42:28+00:00): A few points, largely noticed whilst looking at the (old) CCW vegetation survey data and my own photos and notes:

Quarry Spoil is not usually mapped as landfill, man_made=spoil_heap seems to be the most widely used tag.

The wood mapped as Coed-yr-Allt includes some areas which are not woodland, OS StreetView is not a good guide here. I also think the name refers just to the part above the Watkin Path.

The large area mapped as bare rock by Llyn Gwynant is not so. There are occasional  exposures of rock there, but plenty of grass too.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-04 10:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51714984 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of poor-quality edits following discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-September/020576.html
Johnny Carlsen (2019-03-27 10:15:48+00:00): Hi Ben,

What is "Meet Pitch mark her house"?, it marked as an attraction, but searching the Internet doesn't reveal many attractions around here, and none with the name you gave it.

I'm really curious what this is.
AndriesWijma (2017-09-01 22:37:59+00:00): Beste M&M-BC,
Je hebt drie keer de naam van het buurtschap De Keegen toegevoegd. Met twee daarvan wilde je blijkbaar de naamborden aangeven, wat in theorie zou kunnen maar me niet zinvol lijkt. In elk geval stond De Keegen al op een andere locatie aangegeven (midden tussen drie van de vier boerderijen die ertoe behoren). Daarom heb ik alle drie toevoegingen weer verwijderd.
geoaria (2017-10-29 15:38:44+00:00): دوست عزیز
الان دقیقا ۳ روز هست مشغول اصلاح اشتباهات شما در شهر سمنان هستم ، خواهش می کنم با توجه به اینکه در گروه هم تشریف دارید بیشتر بیاموزید
MKnight (2017-11-14 20:00:09+00:00): Moin, Du hast in Saalfeld sehr viele Etagen eingetragen, leider mit dem falschen Tag 
"building:level", das richtige wäre "building:levels".

Korrigierst Du das? Eine Abfrage findest Du hier: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sZl
wille (2017-08-31 19:49:50+00:00): removi tags acidentalmente de uma relação de bairro. Já fiz a correção em https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51626335
PanierAvide (2017-09-01 06:49:13+00:00): Techniquement pour être précis, la Place de la République est une zone piétonne (avec ce panneau https://www.direct-signaletique.com/I-Grande-13969-panneau-d-indication-zone-pietonne-b54.net.jpg ). Donc elle devrait être en pedestrian.
Verdy_p (2017-09-01 08:05:04+00:00): Non, la place entière est bien piétonne (comme la Rue d'Orléans qui y arrive et passe sous le palais du commerce), mais le Quai Lamartine qui le traverse est bien une zone de rencontre avec un autre panneau bien visible, et le Quai Lamennais est une voie réservée aux bus.