piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
florinbadita_telenav (2017-05-02 08:48:59+00:00): Hi Doug, can you be more specific about the problem/s that you are referring.

From what i have seen in this changeset, the only difference is that the names are expanded. 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

If this is a local rule you should specify it, because in OSM the general rule is to have everything expanded.
Viajero Perdido (2017-05-02 15:23:16+00:00): The suffixes (NW, SW, etc.) are how the City of Calgary spells the names, same with Edmonton.  The OSM wiki pages for Calgary and Edmonton use NW, SW, etc. in their examples; the latter page is more explicit than Calgary's with naming examples.

So NW is literally correct, and "Northwest" is expanded.  And Telenav might be more welcome editing somewhere else.
iandees (2017-05-02 18:32:56+00:00): Hi Viajero. Please check your language and be more kind to others participating in OpenStreetMap. We're all trying to make the map better, and responding like that isn't really helping anyone.
iandees (2017-05-02 18:33:47+00:00): (Same to you, abDoug)
abDoug (2017-05-03 14:19:17+00:00): Names that are just plain wrong!
abDoug (2017-05-03 14:23:16+00:00): They are not making the map better, they are making it worse! Yes, I'm pissed off. I've put a great deal of work into the map and I do it very carefully and try very hard to be accurate. The telenav crew has showed up, presumably because they have some financial interest, repeatedly name roads incorrectly, added hundreds and hundreds of turn restrictions unsupported by Alberta law, and made very little of anything better. There have been many roads in Calgary that have been unnamed for a long time. It is better they remain unnamed than get names that are wrong because editors are sloppy. Everyone makes mistakes from time to time. The telenav crew is just sloppy.
iandees (2017-05-03 14:40:54+00:00): All of that might be true, but you only make yourself (and our map project) look bad and keep people from listening to your opinion when you use such negative and insulting language. If you had responded with something like "hi there, I think your changes are incorrect. here's a link to the city's map that shows the names without an expanded suffix. there's more discussion on the wiki." we probably would be talking about the problem instead of how you used bad words and insulted people. Just a thought.
abDoug (2017-05-04 23:30:27+00:00): THE ISSUE IS NOT THE SUFFIXES! - though that could have been avoided if the editors had bothered to look the map over for a few minutes before editing. The issue is that the telenav crew has applied completely incorrect names to roads all over the city.

I really don't care if I make your map project look bad. I've tried gently numerous times to get the telenav crew to be less incompetent. I don't give a flying fuck what anyone thinks of me.
mavl (2017-10-02 18:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52569295 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48163470].
saikabhi (2017-05-02 06:25:22+00:00): Hi,
Again, continuing on from the changeset comment: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48323895, this changeset also contains fictional waterways. Reverting this changeset too for now.
Thanks,
Abhishek
GerdP (2017-09-07 14:21:30+00:00): Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf lanes=Fußgängerzone
an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490818722
Was war da gemeint?
Pierre_Koeln (2017-11-15 23:59:14+00:00): Sorry, auch ich bin nur ein fehlerbehafteter Mensch und noch dazu noch nicht allzu lange dabei. Habe den völlig korrekt als falsch bemängelten Eintrag nun entfernt und dafür Highway auf "=pedestrian" gesetzt. Nun sollte das in das Schema von OpenStreetMap passen.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-11-16 07:41:06+00:00): Kannst du auch mal einen Blick auf das tagging der umliegenden Straßen werfen. Dort sind living_street mit maxspeed=30 gemappt (nicht von dir). Das paßt nicht zusammen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
Greg_Rose (2017-05-02 16:52:13+00:00): Hey Sebastic. I need to know what I'm doing wrong with my riverbank polylines and relations. Based on your changes, it appears that as soon as a riverbank is part of a relation, it loses the riverbank tag. Is that correct?
I wasn't aware that I was doing anything incorrectly - you've been cleaning things up with a script without notifying me that I was doing it wrong!
sebastic (2017-05-02 18:18:13+00:00): The tags are moved from the outer way to the relation. I process the newly introduced old-style multipoloygons on an almost daily basis.

This is part of the area fixing project by Jochen Topf. See: http://area.jochentopf.com/

If a riverbank consists only of a single closed way, having the tags on the way is appropriate.

As soon as the riverbank has islands it needs to be a multipolygon relation with the tags on the relation instead of the outer way. The inner ways can have tags describing island (place=islet/place=island, landuse=*, etc).

If you can update your script to not create old-style multipolygons that would be great. Starting with osm2pgsql 4.0.0 old-style multipolyons will not be rendered any more. It is not in production on the OSM infrastructure yet, but that's only a matter of time.
Greg_Rose (2017-05-02 20:18:28+00:00): Thx very much for the quick reply and explanation. Just so you know, the script you're running to fix these multipolygons made it appear that I was doing these correctly - I just thought that there was an automatic translation going on (the multipolygon relation would correctly change not long after I saved my work), but that the database was slow to render it.
I'm actually not running a script, so it's no problem to make this change - I'm already using this method, and I've confirmed it's working.
Just an idea...  It would have been helpful to receive a brief msg as part of your bot/script/process - informing me that my multipolygons were not being created correctly.
Thx again...
GR
sebastic (2017-05-02 20:28:10+00:00): I don't use a script, I use the 'Update multipolygon' feature in JOSM. This is a mostly manual process.

Automated edits in OSM are frowned upon, so your edits won't automatically get fixed. Your edits are just easily spotted due to the ongoing area project.

My experience with pointing out flaws in others edits hasn't been good, often resulting in long and unpleasant conversations because too many people don't deal well with criticism. So I opt to do instead of talk.
Greg_Rose (2017-05-04 19:38:55+00:00): Well no worries here - if you see flaws/errors in my work going forward, please let me know. I'll greatly appreciate it! 
I'm passionate about doing this right - and I want to make sure I'm not creating more work for others.
saikabhi (2017-05-02 06:15:46+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Looks like you are adding fictional waterways to valid cycleways and fictional lakes. Please do not add fictional data to the map. Only features on the ground should be mapped. Any particular reason for doing this? Going to revert your changeset now. Please be careful in the future.

Thanks,
Abhishek
acsd (2017-05-02 15:27:45+00:00): Префикс was надо добавлять не к тегу названия, а к тегу poi. Т.к. если скрыть название, то магазин на карте останется просто без названия. Исправил.
ijsb (2017-05-13 20:59:01+00:00): Het stukje van 15m bevatte fors meer tags dan de resterende, niet door mij gesurveyde 900m, dus dat "ten onrechte" valt nogal mee ;-) Goed dat je het andere deel hebt gesurveyed; wellicht zinvol om in zo'n geval survey aan je source toe voegen.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-18 08:52:33+00:00): Hi, ArizonaMapper. I modified some highways (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/490830657, 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/490830655) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
SomeoneElse (2017-05-02 10:13:55+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.
Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and longitude values could have got into the data that you added?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-05-02 10:14:15+00:00): Halo dan selamat datang di OpenStreetMap!
Seperti yang dapat Anda lihat dari garis oranye di sekitar perubahan ini pada peta di sebelah kanan saat Anda melihat changeset di situs OpenStreetMap, itu tumpang tindih dengan Atlantik karena beberapa data tidak sengaja ditambahkan di sana.
Sudahkah Anda tahu bagaimana nilai lintang dan bujur yang salah bisa masuk ke data yang Anda tambahkan?
Salam Hormat,
Andy
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-18 08:52:36+00:00): Hi, ArizonaMapper. I modified some highways (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/490839991,
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/490839989,) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Robert Whittaker (2017-05-09 22:53:48+00:00): Thanks for adding your hotel to OpenStreetMap, but you appear to have put it in completely the wrong place -- in a field in a hamlet call Scotland in Lincolnshire: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4830238477

Presumably the hotel is actually http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/209502349 .

Perhaps you could delete the node you added in the wrong place, and edit the way above to add any additional information about the hotel.
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-03 11:20:27+00:00): Hi, in the footpaths here you have specified access=private with foot=yes. This means that all access except foot is private but access to pedestrians is available to the public. You either need just access=private or just foot=private if you want to say that there is no access to the public which is what I assume you intended. Can you take a look?

Cheers,
Mike
SBaker15 (2017-05-03 16:47:21+00:00): Hi Mike,
Thanks - that was indeed what I meant. This should be corrected now and I make sure I do not make the same mistake in the future!
jimkats (2022-01-10 19:01:43+00:00): Δεν ήξερα καν ότι το ΣΤΕΠ βρισκόταν αλλού πριν το στρατόπεδο Κυριαζή. Χάρη σε σένα το έμαθα τώρα, thanks :D
stavrosP (2022-01-11 15:42:02+00:00): Θα παραμείνει έτσι μέχρι να αποκτήσει νέα χρήση..
RafalR (2017-05-03 07:24:29+00:00): Obwodnica nadal jest w budowie. Proszę nie dodawać informacji nie mających pokrycia w rzeczywistości! Zestaw zmian zostaje wycofany.
highflyer74 (2017-05-03 13:36:58+00:00): Moin Schnuddi! Sei bitte so nett, aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare zu nutzen. Lies Dir dazu bitte diesen Artikel durch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments. Danke!
eggie (2017-05-02 08:58:53+00:00): Welkomst PB gestuurd
j03lar50n (2017-05-03 15:37:04+00:00): >Most of this area just wants deleting tbh
ugh, yeah...because of all the poor landuse/landcover imports?
Richard (2017-05-03 15:42:51+00:00): I was thinking more the really rough TIGER roads around the oilfield - most rural TIGER highway=residentials are an approximation at best, but this bunch is really bad and actively misleading. If all the oilfield roads were deleted, and a few access roads traced afresh, the map would be a lot better. But you're right, the landuse doesn't help!
eggie (2017-05-02 09:03:58+00:00): 'k Ben toch bang dat je nu van het bos een gebouw hebt gemaakt. ik draai de changeset terug. Je kunt gerust reageren als je vragen hebt. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48327294
eggie (2017-05-02 09:09:34+00:00): reverted wegen bosgebied omzetten in gebouw
PB gestuurd
eggie (2017-05-02 09:25:00+00:00): alle begin is moeilijk.. Voor osm geldt dat in het bijzonder. Fouten worden je niet kwalijk genomen. 
Van een bos een gebouw maken .. het is zo gebeurd. 
Soms trekt iemand een gebouw over de halve wereld.
De naam van een bosgebied zal toch niet Bospad zijn.
Voor de highway=residential kun je beter niet residential_link gebruiken. Dat zijn verbindingsgedeeltes tussen verschillende wegen. ..meestal bij afslagen van snelwegen.
Stel ook vragen op het forum van osm. Daar zijn medemappers bereid om naar je edits te kijken en je van advies te dienen.
Je kunt evt. voorstellen onder het draadje welkom.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
SomeoneElse (2017-09-21 13:31:27+00:00): For the avoidance of any doubt - Google Streetview isn't a valid source for OSM (the licence is incompatible).  Obviously you may be mapping things from local knowledge here (and just saying "they really do exist; you can look at GSV if you don't believe me!"), and this data has been deleted anyway now, but just for info.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Jay May (2017-09-22 05:41:32+00:00): Hi Andy. I’ve already been acknowledged with this fact a couple of months ago, after what I stopped using GSV for OSM immediately; but thanks for your reminder. Kind regards. Jerry
Jay May (2017-09-22 05:42:45+00:00): P.S.: in this case I hadn’t used GSV, but I wrote that because one specific user from LT kept deleting my changes and I was angry...
mavl (2018-12-25 20:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-05-02 09:35:04+00:00): Denk dat het beter is niet de naam=Calistenics toestel... in te vullen, maar sport=....
Bij voetbalveld zetten we ook geen name=voetbalveld.
eggie (2017-05-02 09:36:14+00:00): PB gestuurd met nuttige links
Wout van Dijk (2017-05-02 09:53:57+00:00): Geen idee wat het beste hiervoor is. Ik heb dezelfde beschrijving gebruikt als een ander veldje in de Uithof (Utrecht) waar ook bij naam is ingevuld calisthenics toestel.
eggie (2017-05-02 10:12:46+00:00): 'k Zou het eerlijk gezegd ook niet weten. Het ging er alleen maar om dat we bv bij een bankje niet zetten name=bankje. In die categorie..
Je kunt het evt op het forum vragen.  https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
RafalR (2017-08-23 14:59:57+00:00): Przy szpitalu jest 2 kościoły? bo tak wynika z tej edycji.
ChrissW-R1 (2017-10-06 21:04:20+00:00): Please have a look at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4016746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3870917

It is a peninsula, but boundary=land_area in combination of place=peninsula is a good compromise for me.
woodpeck (2017-10-07 09:42:21+00:00): I have modified those two accordingly. Thank you.
woodpeck (2017-10-07 09:47:17+00:00): I have modified those two accordingly. Thank you.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:16:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:35:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:13:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:24:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:58:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Graf Westerholt (2017-05-10 17:31:51+00:00): Ist der Aufzug jetzt drei mal eingetragen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403057842
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321998044
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3287643494
letihu (2017-05-10 18:12:02+00:00): Ja, so etwas hab ich schon oft gesehen. Warum Mapper das machen, erschließt sich mir nicht. Ich hab nur die übereinanderliegenden, nicht verbundenen, Punkte verbunden. 
Die 3 Plattformen haben unterschiedliche Layer obwohl es sicher nur eine gibt.
Vìelleicht können wir daran arbeiten und etwas verbessern. Ich bin gerne dabei!
Graf Westerholt (2017-05-11 09:51:10+00:00): Der Aufzug hält in drei Etagen. Vielleicht meinte jemand, jede Etage eintragen zu müssen. Ich denke nicht, dass das so sinnvoll ist. Wie man einen Aufzug richtig einträgt, müsste ich allerdings im Wiki nachschauen.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:01:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:22:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:24:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:50:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:10:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
highflyer74 (2017-05-02 10:22:07+00:00): Hello! Please be so kind to keep your changesets to a certain area and not spanning half of the planet. Thank you and all the best!
Erelen (2017-05-02 15:16:53+00:00): Привет. Нанесённое здание - это часовня?
Gumeg (2017-05-03 09:00:05+00:00): Я помню, что там есть ещё церковная лавка. Эта крыша видна со спутника. Часовня - отдельное здание
Gumeg (2017-05-03 09:01:07+00:00): Кстати да, можно и её(церковную лавку) и здание часовни добавить. http://svyato.info/uploads/posts/2015-05/1432914012_chasovnya-svyatoy-istochnik-georgiya-pobedonosca-derevnya-anciferovo.jpg
RoterEmil (2017-05-04 10:47:50+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM, nur eine kleine Anmerkung. Mit dem name-tag werden Eigennamen, konkrete Beschriftungen vor Ort u.ä. getaggt, nicht aber Deskriptives. Könntest Du deshalb name=Baum wieder entfernen. Wenn Du die Bäume genauer beschreiben möchtest, kannst Du Dich im wiki informieren: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dtree. Schöne Grüße :)
RoterEmil (2017-05-04 10:50:24+00:00): Ps: wenn Du das name=Baum entfernt hast, kann diese 'note' auch geschlossen werden, die ein anderer User bereits angelegt hat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/984344. Danke schön
Setti (2017-05-18 06:16:51+00:00): Moin, Ich habe die Änderungen aus diesem Changeset der Realität angepasst. Müsste jetzt wieder stimmen. Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48779984
@AlexNg92 bitte schaue vorher ob die Orthophotos auch aktuell sind :) 
Happy mapping an alle...
GeorgeKaplan (2017-10-01 13:00:34+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci de supprimer les données erronées que vous envoyez dans OSM : 
1) POI vraisemblablement inexistant sur l'imagerie aérienne
2) Des informations copiées d'un POI en Suède se retrouve maintenant en France.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2017-10-02 06:56:38+00:00): Bonjour, 
merci de votre signalement
il y a 5 mois nous avons eu une erreur dans notre SI qui avait créé des points en suède, un revert avait été effectué, mais ce point était passé au travers.
encore merci pour votre signalement
Cordialement
Alain
mavl (2018-12-25 21:14:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
sédunois (2017-05-02 09:34:28+00:00): erreur... ce n'est pas un rajout de place de jeux, mais une correction de numéro de rue
désolé
eggie (2017-05-02 10:26:26+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-05-02 10:27:39+00:00): Sorry .. 'k zie dat je met iD iets hebt toegevoegd, Welkomstmail is onderweg.
punya_man (2019-02-28 03:50:48+00:00): "Hi aisah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 437489954 classified as 'unclassied'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'residential' as it is leading to inconsistency.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."