piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gazer75 (2021-10-08 15:26:34+00:00): People tag for the renderer by using the banket tags. Its only access= values that show up on the map. So you end up with a bunch of overrides making the tag list unnecessary long.
Norwegian sign 306.1 should be tagged a motor_vehicle=no

If i left some tags stating use sidepath, then that is an oversight by me.

For Bergen light rail you can look at the strong criteria for light rail over tram on the wiki page you linked.
FredrikLindseth (2021-10-09 07:56:11+00:00): The Bergen Light Rail is surely a light rail. I'm sure this discussion is in another changeset some years ago and it was agreed.
Parts of the rail can be on thing and parts cant be another, it should all be the same
Wulfmorn (2021-10-09 10:15:03+00:00): "I assume the law states that foot and bicycle MUST use the provided cycleways/sidewalks, when they are available, right?"

No, it does not. Not in Norway.
mikkolukas (2021-10-09 10:31:07+00:00): FredrikLindseth: So imagine this scenario in the real world:

A light rail line is connected to a real railway, so the light_rail trains can drive among the "real" trains, thereby saving construction costs while at the same time extending the light rail service. Maybe the light rail now serves stations that the train served before, so the train can have shorter travel times to further away stations.

If we as mappers set a rule that the tracks can only be mapped as one thing for the entirety of the light rail route, then what should it be mapped as here?

Should all the light rail be remapped as railway=rail, as most of the light_rail line is now running on "real" tracks? Hopefully no?

Can you see the problem with that rule?
Wulfmorn (2021-10-09 19:46:51+00:00): That's hardly the case here though. I don't see why you would insist on different rail-types for different parts of the Bybanen-network. It's a closed system.
mikkolukas (2021-10-10 10:54:05+00:00): Wulfmorn: So you are telling me you would rather have one rule for lines that are a closed system vs. another rule if it gets connected?
Wulfmorn (2021-10-10 11:20:13+00:00): I'm saying nothing is connected.
voiden (2022-05-15 02:09:48+00:00): I det siste har EnTur hatt problemer med å vise Bybanestrekningen skikkelig. Om et reiseforslag inneholder bybanen, er det store deler av strekningen kun rette linjer i stedet for en kurve som følger sporet. Det kan godt være at inndeling av sporet i tram og light rail er årsaken. Jeg er forøvrig enig i at bybanen bare burde tagges som light rail, i den siste endringen min fjernet jeg tram-taggene fra området mellom bystasjonen og fløen.
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2022-05-15 09:15:30+00:00): Det er Skyss sitt ansvar å levere slike data, men de bruker OSM i sitt planverktøy, så ja, det kan være problemer. Jeg skal sjekke med Skyss om de opplever utfordringer.
Fabe56 (2025-03-28 14:47:30+00:00): Salut, pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9021355026/ et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9021355027/ Ne s'agit-il pas de la croix de la chapelle Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Sept-Douleurs de Névache https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12707740741 ?
La vue aérienne ne semble pas confirmer la présence de troix croix dans cette zone et les photos des environs https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mont_Thabor_(France) ne semblent pas non plus en montrer d'autres. Sous réserve évidemment ;)
Merci.
Gureumeee (2021-08-19 22:44:17+00:00): Realigned roads and land polygons Northwest of Μεσαιωνική πόλη της Ρόδου #adt 
Imagery: Esri World Imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109956280
Pete Owens (2021-08-22 15:08:25+00:00): This is not the case.

Maybe you saw it during temporary road works. The exit to Park Boulevard is one way (Southwards) only. The only entrance is from Wilderspool Causway.
eggie (2021-08-21 11:11:00+00:00): Beste Padvinder. Je hebt hier aan de oostzijde een pad ingetekend dat niet meer toegankelijk is.Mag ik vragen wat je bron is in deze?
Een medemapper heeft het namelijk net verwijderd. 

MVG
eggie
iWowik (2021-08-20 08:33:22+00:00): День добрый!
соблюдайте пожалуйста принятый порядок написания названий улицю

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
Virkom (2021-08-20 19:48:19+00:00): Добрый день. 
Я вам уже личное сообщение написал. Хорошо, пройдусь по всем улицам и исправлю в соответствии с принятым порядком.
Вам, для информации, также укажу, что тег name:be - это бельгийское наименование. Белорусское будет name:by.
iWowik (2021-08-21 06:18:26+00:00): name:be это именно белорусский язык. Не надо путать язык и государственность.
Коды языков и коды государств часто отличаются.
bigopenmac (2021-08-22 21:11:47+00:00): Привет, Virkom.

Здесь https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Belarus принятые правила для Беларуси.

Все возможные значение для name:<language> собраны здесь https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639-1_codes
ovruni (2021-08-20 04:02:56+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios menciona "Agregué Iglesia La capilla de la roca.", sin embargo también se han eliminado nodos de instituciones educativas, las cuales fueron ingresadas como parte de la importación de instituciones educativas, las cuales poseen etiquetas de dirección a la cual pueden moverse en caso se encuentren mal posicionadas. Por este motivo he recuperado estos nodos.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
Dimusoika (2021-09-24 16:06:10+00:00): Muchas gracias por las correcciones, ovruni
DressyPear4 (2021-08-20 17:30:58+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser abreviados nem copiados do google
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109957317
gendy54 (2022-01-25 21:18:34+00:00): Merci pour le centre de secours, mais celui-ci a déménagé au nord du village. Les données des Sdis ne sont pas toujours mises à jour.
user_12625593 (2021-08-22 14:57:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2814850
user_12625593 (2021-09-01 13:25:48+00:00): Hoi Jeroen, zou je even naar bovenstaande opmerking willen kijken?
ovruni (2021-08-20 03:59:31+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios ha cambiado los vías por áreas, sin embargo estas áreas que ha ingresado contienen menos etiquetas que los nodos originales, lo cual hace que se pierda información como etiquetas de dirección, elevación y códigos de referencia, los cuales fueron ingresados en la importación de instituciones educativas. [0] Por este motivo he recuperado las etiquetas existentes.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importando_instituciones_educativas_en_Per%C3%BA
eggie (2021-08-20 07:00:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback : Zo te zien is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan De track ligt dubbel. En de noexit=yes aanduiding zit op de verkeerde plaats. 
Je hebt de wegen gewoon terug dubbel gevouwen. 
Het was volgens mij al keurig gemapt als een afgesloten weg. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-20 07:18:26+00:00): De Woudweg uit de knoop gehaald en de laatste stukken van beide tracks  op tracktype=grade4 gezet. De noexit=yes punten zitten weer op de juiste plaats.
Routeren zal het hier echt niet en dat zal ook de bedoeling zijn.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-20 07:21:36+00:00): Teun.. wanneer er daadwerkelijk hekken staan kun je die toevoegen op een node welk verbonden is met de weg.
De tag is dan barrier=gate met access=private
gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-20 07:09:48+00:00): Oke...maar ook een kavelpad of schouwpad  kan gewoon gemapt worden in openstreetmap.
Het stond al keurig op access=private en routeren doet het allemaal niet in routeplanner en/of gps. 
Nu ligt alles dubbel en dat is ook niet de bedoeling.
Wanneer het laatste stukje niet meer half verhard is kan het tracktype=grade2 aangepast worden naar bv grade4 (onverhard)
MVG
eggie
skquinn (2021-08-20 09:42:57+00:00): Hi,

At least in the Houston area, buildings along freeways are addressed with the name of the freeway itself. "Frontage Road" isn't part of the legal address. Also, street names in addresses are not abbreviated (this trips warnings in QA tools/validators that will complain there is no road named, for example, "SW Freeway Service Road" nearby).
nslxndr (2023-10-08 06:00:15+00:00): Szia! Egy észrevétel a módosításcsomag kapcsán: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3929597 Csak tájékoztatásul küldöm, ha esetleg maradtak még jegyzeteid vagy rendelkezel helyismerettel.
Warin61 (2021-08-21 07:41:33+00:00): Hi
I have deleted the parking relation as it;
did not from an area.
went from the road centre. 

If you want to indicate parking is available here but it is hard to map the actual area due to the tree cover ... simply place a node about here it is .. handy if you include the capacity...
user_5359 (2022-03-23 07:15:39+00:00): Hello! Could I ask you to check this entry https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9137898382. This is the third attempt by the account to enter its address (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/glendalebankruptcy/history). Two have already been deleted, one of them by you. I can't find any real reason why this should be a wrong position.
Dr Kludge (2022-03-24 01:53:57+00:00): user_5359,  Thank you for the edit checking that you do in the metro Phoenix area.  The node you reference is a Search Engine Optimization spam account and thus spam address.  The user is the same as the business.   SEO spammers dump these addresses all over the place some of them have been as far away as Washington State.  I just get tired of cleaning them up because we have the National Address Database, NAD that has much better addresses.   First off the address is a business address placed in a residential apartment building complex.  The address was placed at 59th Avenue yet the address reads at 51st Avenue.  Northern Avenue is at 8000 North as far as the hundred blocks of the address are concerned.  The address is located at 20325 North not between 8000 and 9000 North i.e. Northern Avenue and Olive/Dunlap Avenue.  I will add some addresses to the apartment are so you get the idea.
Dr Kludge (2022-03-24 02:11:54+00:00): The apartment building address is addr:city=Glendale
addr:housenumber=8546
addr:postcode=85302
addr:state=AZ
addr:street=North 59th Avenue
source=esri_USDOT_Arizona.  The sco spam has been deleted once again.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118843707
Dr Kludge (2022-03-25 00:52:59+00:00): Here are the URLs to the problem from the US mailing list. 
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2018-March/018399.html

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2018-March/018420.html
Jarek 🚲 (2021-08-20 02:27:40+00:00): Main source is the fact that the elevator near the 40 stop goes to eastbound platform, and to very end of it at that. From survey we know platform length is somewhat more than 6-car T1 train which is 138 m. Distance between platforms must be at least a little more than 2 train widths.

I realize the new alignment of the subway track doesn't really match the portal just to west nor currently mapped alignment to east, but I do know where that elevator is. In any case, the subway track is missing some details, like the centre track between Ossington and Christie, so we know it's not extremely accurate.
Felipe Alves (2021-08-20 18:20:13+00:00): Oi, Evania. Tudo bem?
O que quis representar exatamente aqui?
Seja o que for, o ponto não deveria estar na via também.
Qualquer dúvida, avise.
Abs
Evania Ferpe (2021-08-25 03:39:46+00:00): A rua Santa Rosa é da Avenida Washington Soares até a Rua José Hipólito
Felipe Alves (2021-08-25 11:57:58+00:00): Eu estava falando do ponto que colocou na via, "Parque Santa Rosa". O que quis representar com ele?
Evania Ferpe (2021-08-26 02:34:12+00:00): Entende a sua pergunta. Eu ia colocar o nome da comunidade Felipe.

Tentei apagar mas acabava que apagando um trecho da rua.

Sou nova aqui e estou aprendendo como funciona.
Felipe Alves (2021-08-26 13:03:37+00:00): Entendi. Apaguei o ponto.
Seja bem vinda. Qualquer dúvida, só avisar
Evania Ferpe (2021-08-26 16:27:32+00:00): Obrigada Felipe!
Adam Franco (2021-08-20 18:07:26+00:00): Hi Joseph, please do not upgrade these sections to motorway. As described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vermont these sections are not up to full interstate standards. While they have grade separation they are mostly single-lane each direction aside from an exceedingly short approach to the large interchange, are otherwise not separated by direction, and low speed limit (50-55mph). Beyond this large interchange they are single-carriageway.

Please join us to discuss further in the #local-vermont channel of the OSM-US Slack (I see you've already joined the Slack). About a dozen mappers from the region have been discussing the top-level (motorway & trunk) road tagging in the region for months and have come to the consensus that these roads should be tagged as highway=trunk for their connectivity importance and expressway=yes for their enhanced construction level, but not highway=motorway as their construction level isn't high enough for a significant-enough distance to warrant this upgrade.
Joseph R P (2021-08-20 19:19:32+00:00): My bad, I was unaware of the discussion/consensus, and usually these types of roads are tagged as motorway in my region and in other parts of the US I edit in. I've reverted my changeset.
Adam Franco (2021-08-20 22:50:08+00:00): Thanks, Joseph! Happy mapping!
Joseph R P (2021-08-21 00:13:45+00:00): No problem, happy mapping!
gpserror (2021-08-20 06:18:09+00:00): Hi, was S. Bofer Canyon Rd closed temporarily for repairs or is it permanent?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109959799
govancanucks (2021-08-20 06:22:22+00:00): That part is closed permanently and completely ripped up, they are adding an underpass so the road is going to be re-routed in the next few months further to the east of 395 to make space for the new interchange.
Romwriter (2021-08-20 08:22:27+00:00): Herzlich Willkommen bei Openstreetmap und vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge, insbesondere für die Korrektur der vertauschten Wegebezeichnungen! Zu dem Pfad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974863496 noch eine Rückfrage. Die Breite ("width=60") hast Du in Zentimetern angegeben, richtig? Wenn keine Maßeinheit dabei steht, dann bitte in Metern, das wäre also hier "width=0.6". Vielen Dank!
pza (2021-08-24 00:09:04+00:00): I don't think this change is correct.  The area is explicitly signed, and used as bus parking. I think the person who added the note was trying to say that there is no public car parking - which is correct. But it is certainly a bus parking area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109959997
evo_evz (2021-08-24 18:07:39+00:00): Ok I added the park back in. I couldn't find an explicit buses only park tag so added the following tags. Hopefully these should suffice but I'm open to suggestions

access=no
amenity=parking
name=Buses only
parking=surface
surface=asphalt
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-05 23:08:41+00:00): you misaligned roads here, I realigned. please, use some kind of gps trace to check the image you are using to realign.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-05 23:09:43+00:00): example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3413069663
Supaplex (2021-08-20 04:48:05+00:00): 你變森林專家了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109960779
Vintagejhan (2021-08-20 07:14:17+00:00): 好傷眼啊!
joel56dt (2021-08-20 04:38:51+00:00): Looks good! Adding the city and province is unnecessary since these nodes are already located within the city/provincial boundaries
Javier Sanchez (2021-08-23 11:32:42+00:00): Your changeset span from USA to Iran. Please do your next edits in a smaller area. Regards.
tekim (2021-08-25 21:53:41+00:00): Yes, please keep the geographic extent of your changesets to a more reasonable size, such as a few neighborhoods.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109961049
JayTurnr (2021-08-20 05:41:15+00:00): Hi, thanks for surveying and resolving the note, bet you left the tgas on node #695863615 which was the nod in question. I think it's probably safe to just delete that node entirely
kaxtillo (2021-08-23 16:59:12+00:00): Buen día, ¿En que consiste este conjunto de cambios? ¿Desde que fuente se obtuvo la información?
Cafetom (2021-08-23 17:26:13+00:00): Hola buen día, la información de la división urbana de Popayán se encuentra en la página de la alcaldía
kaxtillo (2021-08-23 17:33:46+00:00): Seria interesante incluir ese source en el conjunto de cambio.
Cafetom (2021-08-23 17:48:27+00:00): Claro!!
skyper (2021-08-25 11:10:19+00:00): Hallo krjkotam
Anstatt zu Löschen hättest Du doch auch einfach die Objekte anpassen können, wie ich es Dir in (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109847811) mit Beispiel (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974659019) beschrieben habe. Was hat Dich zum Löschen bewegt?

Fragende Grüße
skyper
krjkotam (2021-08-30 11:42:27+00:00): Hi Skyper, 
I have made the changes as suggested by you in the changeset (110456064). Please let me know if there is any error in it. Thanks for the valuable feedback. 
Regards,
krjkotam.
Frans S (2021-08-20 13:05:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Rectangular buildings has to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
Frans S (2021-08-20 13:10:31+00:00): Hi. Another point
When parts of a building are hidden by trees, extrapolate the rooflines rather than following the treelines.
Best regards
jmapb (2021-08-20 23:03:15+00:00): Hi Ryan -- this is a real map used by real people. Please don't vandalize it. I've reverted this changeset. Thanks, J
habi (2021-08-24 08:09:38+00:00): Ciao cmitpenfield and welcome to OpenStreetMap

It's nice that you added yourself to OSM, but we're not here for SEO, so I updated your listing with the correct tags, making them machine-readable and usable for all data consumers of OpenStreetMap.
My edits are found in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110156007
Have a good day,
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

PS: I came here from https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm, triggered by your 'video 1'-tag :)
WalthamCity (2021-08-22 15:02:39+00:00): Thanks for implementing this so quickly!

Did you intend to have the “motor_vehicles=no” tag for the Aldwych? (Admittedly this is currently true while the works are in progress!)
WalthamCity (2021-08-22 15:05:10+00:00): I meant “motor_vehicle=no”
MacLondon (2021-08-22 21:50:53+00:00): Hi. I removed this tagging earlier today, once works were announced as finished.

I'm not sure if two-way has started along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252614807 to Fleet St. though. I saw conflicting maps this week, but I'd be surprised if it's not two-way.

When I surveyed round there on Thu night, I thought there would need to be some additional changes at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/258663529 where eastbound traffic would merge. Layout might have changed over the weekend though.

There could also be new traffic access restrictions at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4299212 now the oneway has been reversed along it also.
iWowik (2021-08-20 09:37:04+00:00): День добрый!

1) В название населенного пункта не надо писать длинное сочинение, только его название.
2) Название элемента улично-дорожной сети Почтовая это Почтовая аллея, Почтовая набережная или Почтовая площадь.
Принято писать полностью.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
iWowik (2021-08-20 09:41:37+00:00): Аналогичный ошибки во многих ваших правках за последние месяцы, например
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958099906/history
muchichka_s (2021-08-20 07:39:59+00:00): Привіт https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679829838 в кінці заблокована і не має виїзду до польової дороги. Це добре видно на зображеннях + я там особисто був. Там хіба що людина, може велосипед проїде. Треба в кінці зробити частинку hghway=path
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109965464
pio2_122 (2021-08-20 08:37:36+00:00): A place name is not a street name. I have withdrawn the changes.
osmapper-ffo (2021-08-20 12:55:30+00:00): Hi @pio2_122,
afaik, there is no other "Streetname" here. I was surprised myself, but at the beginning of the small streets as well as on the buildings itself it's written like this: "Zastan 311" or "Zastan 300-349"

So for me, it seems to be the street name. Would you like me to provide a photo?
pio2_122 (2021-08-20 13:38:36+00:00): There are no names given to specific streets in this village at all. According to Polish law, in such a situation addresses have the form: "Name of locality, ordinal number", instead of "Name of locality, street name, ordinal number". Hence, "Zastań" is the name of the locality, not the name of the street. I know that as a non-Pole it is difficult to distinguish the name of a locality from the name of a particular street on street signs. To make things easier, I can mention that the name of the locality should always be marked on a green board at the entrance to the locality. In the case of this village, it looks like this: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=496343174998250

Here a relevant excerpt from the Regulation of the Minister of Development, Labour and Technology of 21 July 2021 on the register of towns, streets and addresses: "In the case of a locality where streets and squares are not given names, the register shall contain sets of address points referred to in paragraph 3 for the entire locality.". The regulation is fairly new, but the principles concerning this issue have not changed for many years and were present in previous regulations.

Translating this into OSM rules: where there are no specific street names, we do not add the name of the locality as a road name. A node with the appropriate place=* and name=* tags value is sufficient.
So, we tag such addresses as: addr:place=[ name of locality] + addr:housenumber=[ordinal number].
In the case when the locality has given street names, the OSM address has the following format: addr:city=[name of locality] + addr:street=[street name ]+ addr:housenumber=[ordinal number].
More information about addressing on the forum, in Polish: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897.

I hope I have clarified this complicated topic. If there is still something not clear - I will try to answer your questions.
osmapper-ffo (2021-08-22 13:28:16+00:00): Hi pio2_122,

thank you very much! As you already said - it's difficult for a non-Pole. :)
However, I appreciate the time you spend to clarify this for me in this detailed form. Now I know better for the next time.

I wish you a pleasant day. :)