piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
praeteritum (2023-11-28 12:15:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144546643.
muralito (2017-10-27 12:49:29+00:00): Muy bien! Seguí agregando que siempre se precisan conocedores de cada localidad.

Te paso algunos piques.
- Las cosas no se abrevian. Ej. Avenida y no Av.
- Jardin es amenity=kindergarten
- El "Calle" no va en el nombre casi nunca, solo lo he visto cuando es como "Calle 27"

Lo que seguro podes aportar es las alturas de las calles, ya sea ingresandolas vos mismo o pasando informacion de como son.

Te recomiendo leer el wiki de la comunidad argentina. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina
vam_002 (2019-04-23 08:47:17+00:00): Hi adiatmad,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 535855806
way 535855805
way 540358739
way 535855811" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the entire area is seems to be 'Track'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
adiatmad (2019-04-24 02:49:06+00:00): Hello vam_002

This changeset is outside from Bandung, but you are correct about  those ways. I agree, please change into track.

Happyy mapping!
Supaplex (2018-01-20 14:45:58+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Didz (2017-11-23 15:24:52+00:00): Construction is full on here now hey.
CloCkWeRX (2017-11-24 10:46:32+00:00): Worth marking landuse=construction?
Didz (2017-11-24 10:53:22+00:00): Yes, I actually took a photo of the large project information sign on site that had a map on it a while ago I forgot about. It's now a residential area with new streets too.
Didz (2017-11-28 11:20:27+00:00): I've added detail now.
aharvey (2017-11-01 22:39:33+00:00): You could change it to highway=service, service=driveway, access=private rather than deleting, but I'm not fussed.
aharvey (2017-11-01 23:21:20+00:00): Thanks for contributing.

1. AFAIK this facility is mostly un-staffed so no office here right?
2. An industrial process takes place here so should be landuse=industrial.
3. Add the operator=Sydney Water
4. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=amenity%3Dutility_water isn't used, so I would leave this out. The landuse=industrial + water tanks imply it.
user_5359 (2017-10-27 08:44:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have reverted yourchangeset, because you are not a church and your node isn’t well placed. Don’t use Google or other business geo coder (diallowed from business side).
keithonearth (2020-06-02 04:17:20+00:00): At least two of the buildings in this edit mistakenly have a single address added, when two exist in reality. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331442853/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331442829/history)
aharvey (2017-11-01 22:25:23+00:00): Perhaps building=retail would fit here since it sells things?

You could just add amenity=atm as a seperate node inside the building, it's more likely to be used by data consumers and you can then add tags specifc to the atm.
aharvey (2017-11-01 23:04:46+00:00): We now have this pub mapped twice

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518743604
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535898268

I prefer to map the grounds since someone in the outdoor seating area is still at the pub. So I'd put all the tags relating to the pub on the outside way, and just leave the tags relating to the building on the building itself. That's my preference. Open to what you think.
alee_m (2019-04-16 07:54:49+00:00): Hi  Ms Kiara,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 535908883
way 535908882
way 535908884" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, entire area seems to be 'Service'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
BeKri (2017-11-12 12:59:00+00:00): Servus,
Du hast mit
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518517574
ein Gebäude eingezeichnet, das vorher schon mit Hausnummer 1 eingetragen war ...
Was stimmt jetzt ?
kartonage (2017-12-16 11:33:44+00:00): Vermutlich eher die Hausnummer 6, da der Golfplatz auch laut Website die Nummer 1 hat. Und zwei mal wird es die hier wohl nicht geben.
4004 (2017-10-28 23:40:42+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
если бы вы внимательнее посмотрели бы на карту, то увидели бы, что точка уже есть
Nakaner (2017-10-29 13:12:17+00:00): Hi AimeeE,

this and your previous changesets seem to be an import. When was this import discussed on the international Imports mailing list? Where is this import documented at the OSM wiki?

Imports must comply with the Import Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines). If you do not respond to this question, I will assume that this import violates the guideline.

In addition, this changeset deleted lots of nodes without giving a proper reason. Please explain why you deleted them to prevent that this changeset will be treated as vandalism.

Best regards

Michael
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
Nakaner (2017-10-27 13:09:52+00:00): Hallo Fabian Karlsruhe/FabianKVV,

ich hatte dich neulich ausdrücklich gebeten, dir die Wiki-Seite DE:Key:access zu lesen und zu verstehen. Es sieht so aus, als wäre mein Geschwätz für die Katz. Du hast hier motor_vehicle=destination ergänzt, was falsch ist, weil dort nur Busse und Straßenbahnen fahren dürfen, aber nicht alle Kraftfahrzeuge.

Bitte lies dir die Seite durch, verstehe sie und mappe nicht, damit irgendeine kommerzielle, fehlerbehaftete Routingapplikation von Init, PTV oder sonstwem dir genehme Routen erzeugt. OSM-Daten werden auch noch von anderen Personen und Organisationen als dir verwendet. Mit deinen unsauber eingetragenen Busspuren tust du dir und den anderen keinen Gefallen.

Bitte nimm diese und die anderen Kommentare ernst! Dies ist die letzte Warnung.

Viele Grüße

Michael
NetWormKido (2017-10-27 08:14:33+00:00): Привет, был вынужден удалить твои объекты, т.к. они дублировали мои. Мы одновременно рисовали один район. Просьба, чтобы подобные коллизии больше не повторялись, указывать район своей работы здесь http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/698
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
syntex (2021-09-26 17:22:29+00:00): Zmiana? Skasowałeś budynek
manog_nya (2019-05-08 07:28:47+00:00): "Hi Dion Qairawan,


Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across
way 535935888
classified as Unclassified. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be a residential.
As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

Thanks in Advance"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
Thalassin (2017-11-05 04:15:13+00:00): Hallo liebe/r AzubiGeAT, 
ich habe heute sehr überrascht festgestellt, dass du vor einigen Tagen den Knoten "Erfurt" angefasst und das sehr wichtige place=city-Tag gelöscht hast. Deiner Nutzerstatistik entnehme ich, dass du noch nicht so lange dabei bist, aber so ein "Anfängerfehler" sollte eigentlich nicht passieren. Bitte achte in Zukunft darauf, keine relevanten Tags zu löschen. Gerne kannst du dich im Forum umschauen und um Rat fragen, falls du dir bei etwas unsicher bist. 
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Thalassin
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
DD1GJ (2017-10-27 08:07:38+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Leider entstehen durch Deine Edits sehr viele technische Fehler und Beschädigungen anderer Objekte. Hier hast Du z.B. ein Gebäude über ein bereits bestehendes Gebäude gezeichnet. Zeichne die Büros bitte nur als Punkte ein. Aufgrund der geringen Relevanz werden solche Büros auf den allermeisten Karten nicht dargestellt. Arbeite dich bitte gründlich in die Funktionsweise von OSM ein.

http://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
eggie (2017-10-27 08:19:31+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-10-27 08:22:20+00:00): Liever geen adressen aanbrengen met maps.me , maar info toevoegen aan de bestaande adresnode. ik pas het aan.
eggie (2017-10-27 08:24:26+00:00): info samengevoegd met adresnode
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
eggie (2017-10-27 08:31:18+00:00): IJssalon Roethof staat reeds getagd op OSM, maar dan op Arnhemseweg 123.
Ik verwijder uw bijdrage.
In de toekomst svp ook op de BAG adresnode taggen. 

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Nakaner (2017-10-29 13:08:57+00:00): Hi harcher,

this and your previous changesets seem to be an import. When was this import discussed on the international Imports mailing list? Where is this import documented at the OSM wiki?

Imports must comply with the Import Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines). If you do not respond to this question, I will assume that this import violates the guideline.

Best regards

Michael
harcher (2017-10-30 10:05:04+00:00): Good morning,
Although it's large amount of data, it's not an import in the sense referred to in the Wiki. We had a team of enumerators drawing houses in QGIS using DigitalGlobe images, and are uploading that information in batches. It was preferably logistically to do in QGIS for data cleaning and aggreagation, but batches are also cleaned against existing OSM data before uploading to prevent duplication and overlap (i.e., areas with previously drawn structures). These uploads were done in partnership with OSM, who we are working with on this project. 

Please let me know if this answers your questions, and if I can provide more information. This response also applies to users Annie Martin (anniecmar), Frazer Bwalya (fbwalya), Aimee Edmondo (aedmondo), and Zaccy Chitoshi (zchotoshi), or anyone tagging #akros/Akros.

Thank you,
Helena
Nakaner (2017-11-01 20:36:23+00:00): Hi Helena,

thank you for your response. Could you please provide the license agreement between Digital Globe and you which explicitly allows you to upload traced features to OpenStreetMap?

If you edit OSM, you must not user sources we are not explicitly allowed to use.

Best regards

Michael
harcher (2017-11-02 06:04:55+00:00): Good morning Michael,

I can look into this, but the DigitalGlobe Standard images available via JOSM are already match the features we have drawn? That is, we could have created the same shapefile in OSM as it's the same source.

Warmly,
Helena
SomeoneElse (2017-11-02 22:37:09+00:00): @harcher "batches are also cleaned against existing OSM data before uploading to prevent duplication and overlap (i.e., areas with previously drawn structures). "
This hasn't happened in a number of places, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53283139 .  I commented there 7 days ago; there was no response from the mapper.  Some of these edits are of such poor quality that we'll likely have to revert the changes.
Nakaner (2017-11-07 21:02:34+00:00): Hi Helena,

the features you uploaded today do not match any of the imagery we are allowed to use (example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539035317). In addition, nobody from your team proved that you have the permission to use imagery from "DigitalGlobe EV Webhosting". The lack of an explicit permission means that you are not allowed to use this source and that all edits of you and your team have to be reverted.

Please refrain from further edits.

Best regards

Michael
harcher (2017-11-07 21:36:52+00:00): Good evening,
If you could provide me an email address or other means to upload files, I would be happy to share with you a screenshot that shows where the shapefiles align with DigitalGlobe Premium Images available in JOSM for Siavonga. Additional structures may be drawn in, but this is likely due to more recent imagery than that available in JOSM, and thus more accurate and useful for on the ground work. I will also point out that the houses drawn will be visited and corrected by field staff recording spray coverage, and "ground survey" is recommended by OSM to supplement aerial images (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#Matching_imagery_using_different_editors). I can also share the licensing agreement in the same way. As far as revisiting other areas, we are making a sizable contribution to mostly unmapped places in Zambia, and as with most work we do have deadlines; we would appreciate any assistance from OSM's side to ensure that clean, recent data is available. We are discussing best practice with our partner for OSM for areas of overlap, including those changesets that are still problematic.
Thank you.
Helena
Nakaner (2017-11-07 21:44:17+00:00): Hi Helena,

you can either upload the agreement to the OSM wiki or send it to ahfogoo2xugohj4iy2li@michreichert.de (the email address is a temporary alias and will be deleted in a few weeks for spam protection).

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2017-11-08 18:58:10+00:00): Hi Helena,

thank you for sending me the email. I will have a look on it and forward it to SomeoneElse.

Best regards

Michael
highflyer74 (2017-10-29 14:48:22+00:00): Gleiche Frage wie hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53282879
dgitto (2017-10-28 16:46:42+00:00): Hi. There is a typo: 
"addr:disctrict" . On 78 objects
highflyer74 (2017-10-29 14:45:13+00:00): Moin!

Kurze Frage: "corridor" wird nur für Indoor Mapping verwendet (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=corridor?uselang=de).

Um was handelt es sich denn hier tatsächlich? Über eine kurze Rückmeldung freue ich mich.

Gruss aus HB!
ReinholdR (2017-10-29 18:08:23+00:00): Moin,
es handelt sich um einen Durchgang innerhalb eines Gebäudes mit Läden und Zugang zum Hotel Deutscher Kaiser wie eine kleine Einkaufspassage. Der Zugang ist auf beiden Seiten durch eine Automatische Tür gesichert und nicht ganztätig möglich.
Dies ist anders als bei der Möwenpassage etwas weiter nordöstlich. Dort handelt es sich um einen Gebäudedurchgang, der jederzeit möglich ist.
highflyer74 (2017-11-14 13:12:52+00:00): Moin Reinhold,

jetzt komme ich endlich dazu, mich zu melden. Ich danke Dir für die Information. Dann können wir alles so lassen :-)
corfede (2017-11-02 14:24:01+00:00): Ciao Andrea, ho eliminato il poligono che avevi inserito, anche perchè dal titolo del changeset ho capito che si trattava solo di una prova, quindi di un poligono senza significato. Ti prego di non fare prove di questo tipo, ma se hai bisogno di qualunque supporto puoi chiedere tranquillamente a me o in lista talk-it. Ciao, Federico.
andreachiarello (2017-11-02 14:35:21+00:00): Ciao Federico, mi scuso mi sto avvicinando ora allo strumento e non immaginavo le prove fossero visibili a tutti. Stavo cercando una maniere per disegnare le ZTL cittadine, sai dirmi se siano già presenti nelle mappe e se non lo fossero quale sia il porcesso migliore per tracciarle? Ti ringrazio per il supporto, Andrea
corfede (2017-11-02 19:08:21+00:00): E' un argomento abbastanza dibattuto. Il mio suggerimento è di mappare le limitazioni della ZTL su ogni strada interessata. Ci sono anche proposte di mappatura delle ZTL mediante poligoni, ma non credo abbiano poi effetto sui navigatori che attualmente usano le mappe OSM. Ad ogni modo puoi farti un'idea più precisa attraverso questo recente thread della lista talk-it. Se hai dubbi puoi anche continuare quella discussione in lista o aprirne un'altra. Ciao, Federico.
corfede (2017-11-02 19:08:55+00:00): Scusami mi era sfuggito il link della discussione: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-September/060241.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
SomeoneElse (2017-10-27 13:34:25+00:00): Hello,
I don't think that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535979294 is a motorway!  Did you tag it as that by mistake?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-10-27 13:30:11+00:00): Hello,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535984314 appears to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494011885 that was added 5 months ago
Can you stop adding stuff for a while until we can sort out how to avoid these duplicates?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-11-02 23:09:09+00:00): Also http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535984187
overlaps
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531282011 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
Nakaner (2017-11-04 10:07:16+00:00): Hallo Claudius Henrichs,

da auf der Strecke, soweit ich weiß, kein regelmäßiger Personenvekehr mehr besteht, sollte meiner Meinung nach public_transport=* dort auch nicht mehr verwendet werden.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Claudius Henrichs (2017-12-31 12:06:00+00:00): Hallo Michael,
Soweit ich das weiss fahren dort ab und an noch Sonderzüge und die ÖPV-Infrastruktur wird noch gepflegt und vorgehalten. Siehe auch http://www.ris-sachsen.eu/CMS/index.php/strecken/nossen-freiberg
Da also dort noch ein Haltepunkt besteht würde ich public_transport=* weiter behalten.
Viele Grüsse,
Claudius
mapper999 (2017-10-28 07:45:35+00:00): Hallo wegavision,
kannst du dir bitte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22934235 nochmal anschauen. Es wäre mir neu, dass die Ortsumgehung für Lkw gesperrt ist.
mapper999 (2017-10-28 08:30:52+00:00): Und an der L 555 hast du wohl versehentlich das lanes-tag gelöscht?
cMartin (2017-10-30 12:14:19+00:00): Dieser Node ist falsch plaziert. Es ist bereits schön zu sehen, dass im GEGENÜBERLIEGENDEN GEBÄUDE die Adresse mit Hausnummer 2 existiert und auch vor Ort befindet sich das Geschäft dort.

Du fällst immer mehr unangenehm auf, bitte trage die Daten korrekt ein, sonst müsste ich mal mit deinem Chef reden!
PlaneMad (2018-11-26 10:06:25+00:00): Many thanks for your contributions around Masturi. Have made several corrections and the map should look much better now.
azalizh (2018-10-19 11:44:22+00:00): Witam,
a skąd ta nazwa Pustynia Dźwirzyńska?
grelus (2018-11-05 19:52:37+00:00): z mediów lokalnych opisujących budowę ścieżki rowerowej na kładce nad wydmą
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
surveyor54 (2017-10-28 11:15:15+00:00): Hi,

ich will nicht nerven, aber schau dir das bitte einmal an.

Schwimmbad ist nicht landuse=recreation_ground

sondern:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Schwimmbad

Gruß
surveyor54
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-05 04:47:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53501753 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some imported or semi-imported buildings including many overlaps in Zambia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed and communication via someone that appears to be the project co-ordinator also failed
eggie (2017-10-27 09:42:04+00:00): Even terzijde.. 'k Zie dat ref N638 ook nog op de Prinsenstraat staat. Klopt dat nog? Die nieuwe randweg Beeklaan heb ik indertijd getagd toen hij net klaar was. Heeft die wel ref N638? Dan zou die van de Prinsenstraat nog af moeten.
user_5359 (2017-11-02 18:49:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!