piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GerdP (2019-03-12 05:26:16+00:00): Hi, I just checked to see the result of the problems discussed in JOSM ticket 17455. Your work flow should be this: Download data, edit, validate, update, upload. Try to keep that cycle short to avoid conflicts. The update step is optional but helps when others edit the same area. Try also Help -> introduction to get some more basics. 

Please download the area again and execute JOSM validator (Shift+V). You should find many errors like duplicated ways and duplicated nodes which were created by you. 
You also created some invalid turn restrictions. Please reread the wiki about this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
In short: The from and to way have to start or end at the via node.
Hope that helps, happy mapping!
bielebog (2019-03-12 08:45:03+00:00): Die Fahrschule sollte per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=driving_school auch als solche eingetragen werden. so wie's momentan eingetragen ist, ist das einfach nur ein unstrukturierter Punkt mit Name. Generell ist der Eintrag (also ein "tag" in "OSM-Sprech") name=*¹ für den Eigennamen einer Sache da. Um _was_ es sich handelt, also in diesem Fall eine Fahrschule, wird strukturiert mit dem entsprechenden Tag eingetragen. Im wiki findest Du dazu eine Übersicht².

¹ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name

² https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-13 08:44:44+00:00): Hi Tortenguru, why do you add wikipedia + wikidata of not-existing Articles/Entity? This is just a dead link.
wikidata=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konditorei_Fromme
wikipedia=de:Deutschsprachige Wikipedia

Alex
habi (2019-03-12 18:47:03+00:00): Isn't the Tibits also on the ground level?
freaktechnik (2019-03-12 18:47:46+00:00): It is, that's why I left the previous tag in place, though it should probably be annotated that the one on the ground level is currently undergoing redecoration and is thus not open to the public.
freaktechnik (2019-03-12 18:55:12+00:00): so they currently aren't a single entity, not sure if they'll in the future be connected, in which case they should probably be tagged as a relation?
habi (2019-03-12 22:11:47+00:00): Oh, I just assumed that they merged with their rooms with the restaurant above when I read it in the newspaper. I haven't been there since the redecoration... It's all good then I suppose.
althio (2019-03-12 10:41:33+00:00): some paths and footways related to Denbury Court are also included in the relation for Braunton Crescent
alexkemp (2019-03-12 14:13:36+00:00): Whoops (and thanks). I've removed them in JOSM and they will be corrected on next uplift. They were intended for the Denbury relation and I clearly had a brain-fart and added them to the wrong relation (also now fixed and awaiting uplift).
Trevor_1 (2019-03-12 14:00:18+00:00): Are you sure this should be primary? I intentionally left it as secondary because of the ferry. It doesn't connect.
Evandering (2019-03-13 17:39:59+00:00): Hi 1T-money,

The ferry has motor_vehicle=yes with frequent service, and travel guides such as Lonely Planet and Wikivoyage suggest it is not a major barrier. Based on this, I don’t think the north part of RD PET-11 should be classified differently than the south part. It's just as important for access to Sayaxché from the north as the south part.

Cheers,

Evandering
Trevor_1 (2019-03-13 18:03:18+00:00): Ok yeah, you're right. That makes sense.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-12 12:35:45+00:00): "survey" ? Vous n'utilisez pas d'imagerie ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676144503 n'est pas un bâtiment mais un groupe de bâtiments - or building=yes s'applique à un bâtiment individuel et non à un ilot bâti. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676144489 est-il un bâtiment construit très récemment ? Il n'apparaît pas sur l'imagerie ESRI, ce qui est suspect.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68042931
petitjoseph (2019-03-12 15:58:23+00:00): Merci Jean marc. Effectivement il y'a de nouveaux bâtiments qui ne se figurent pas sur les images de Bing. Pour la plus part ce sont des terrains que j'ai visité  et en plus j'utilise l'image des missions les plus récentes. Au moins 3 images différentes
petitjoseph (2019-03-12 15:59:10+00:00): Pour ce qui est des sources je vais rectifier
petitjoseph (2019-03-12 16:01:16+00:00): Pour la fiabilité vous avez le droit de douter mais je cartographie des zones que je fréquente moi même.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-12 16:10:20+00:00): Merci pour les réponses, qui me rassurent... Tout le monde n'est pas aussi consciencieux que vous alors nous devons poser les questions. Quelles sont les images que vous considérez les plus récentes ? Elles sont publiquement accessibles ?
Frans S (2019-06-12 17:19:45+00:00): Hi Ziegz. A remark.  Mapping a round hut in iD editor is drawing a triangle and hitting the O key . See the how to pages.
Best regards
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-12 01:25:27+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM :)

Thank you for your contributions so far. I saw you added a park area named "grassy field". I have substituted this with landuse=grass and removed the descriptive name.

We try to keep the name= tag for actual names as opposed to descriptions.

Remember that you can always use the OSM wiki as a guide for how to correct tag features :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org
viloan (2019-03-12 00:35:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-12 01:22:15+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your edits so far :)

Question - This appears to be a building, but a recreation ground tends to imply open green space for sports. 

Would it be better tagged as a sports centre or community centre as well as a building?

---

Also, regarding some of your other edits - thank you for your attention to detail, but we try to keep the name tag for actual names. 

For example, you've mapped a police station with the name "police station" is it actually called something like Mapleton District Police Department or something similar?

If you have any questions feel free to ask, and remember you can always use the OSM wiki as a guide for tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-03-12 01:42:50+00:00): parabéns pela sua primeira edição, embora, as edições que você fez não pareçam corresponder com o que pode ser visto no mapa, se assim for, você deve provavelmente removê-los, se não outros contribuidores revendo o seu trabalho podem fazê-lo por você

sinta-se à vontade de me contactar se você precisar de ajuda com alguma coisa
PierZen (2019-03-15 14:02:33+00:00): Au début février, la communauté OSM du Canada a demandé d'arrêter l'import de bâtiments dont plusieurs étaient tracés de façon très imporécise. Je constate que vous poursuivez l'import. Vous devez cesser immédiatement et venir en discuter sur la liste de discussion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca
--------------------------------------------------------
In early February, the Canada OSM community asked to stop the import of buildings, many of which were very sketchy. I notice that you are continuing the import. You must stop immediately and come and discuss it on the mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca
muralito (2019-03-12 13:12:06+00:00): Hola Emilio.

Por favor tené mas cuidado en los casos que modifiques elementos que ya existian, por ejemplo, en este caso cambiaste el nodo "place=city" que representa a la ciudad de Tacuarembó. Ya lo corregí dejandolo como antes.
Warin61 (2019-03-14 06:19:30+00:00): Hi
The sub station is only a simple way. 

The site relation forms the wind farm ... 

--------------------------
The change set comments make no sense to me ... what is 'company id' ? 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Warin61 (2019-03-12 08:36:45+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

Most things in OSM tags are lower case, so industrial=Wind_farm is not good. You are best looking at the OSMwiki for tags to use. According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wind_farms#Notes  landuse=industrial is not good for wind farms. 

The outside of the area you created crosses it self .. that is not good either ...
Warin61 (2019-03-22 06:37:36+00:00): No response. Deleted.
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2020-12-18 01:12:31+00:00): Hi TuanIfan, 
I found a way-676151825 that created by you without a tag. Did you forget or made it on purpose?
thank you
TuanIfan (2020-12-18 01:25:09+00:00): Hi Elizsabeth, thank you for the comment. I've edited it ^^
mavl (2019-07-21 13:47:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:47:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:47:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:47:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:47:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SomeoneElse (2019-06-28 13:48:03+00:00): Hello,
What was the source of the access change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23693680 here?
Best Regards,
Andy
Supaplex (2019-04-07 14:04:24+00:00): 您好：

恭喜你完成第一筆編輯，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

一般來說不建議初次編輯的人使用較強大但也容易不小心出問題JOSM來編輯，請先熟悉網頁版的編輯器iD。使用JOSM時請對照OSM Wiki的文件，查詢能夠使用的標籤。

如果有什麼進階的資料想要放到OpenStreetMap上，請洽詢下面列出的溝通管道，與社群講你想做什麼。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站   http://www.openstreetmap.tw (暫時下架)
OSM.TW 備份站 https://assanges.github.io/osmtw-ghpage/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群 Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
apm-wa (2019-04-10 17:06:03+00:00): Уже на карте.  Удаляю.
viloan (2019-03-12 04:31:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2019-04-07 14:05:58+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Happy Mapping!
nevw (2019-03-12 10:31:35+00:00): Hi 
please use title case for your street names and delete the fixme tag after you have added the names.
Martinich drive and Betterton road need fixing.
Tks
000000000 (2019-03-13 02:22:37+00:00): Hello nevw, thx for the pointers, I presume you mean "use capital letters" = "title case"? but I have no idea what is, nor how to delete the "fixme tag".
L.
nevw (2019-03-13 04:52:09+00:00): Hi 
yes, use upper case (capitol letter) for the first letter of each word in the name, though there are exceptions.
Here is some info on names generally https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

To delete a tag using the Id editor, select the street, then scroll down to see the fixme tag, then select the bin or trash icon.
nevw (2019-03-13 04:55:51+00:00): expressed correctly....
Use mixed case with the first letter of each word capitalised
Elyana IRM-ED (2022-11-29 01:23:58+00:00): Hi, Menir_PMI
You did a great job, but I have to deleted the data due to overlapping with other building.
Thank you, happy mapping!
Glassman (2019-03-12 14:23:10+00:00): Please don't delete good tag and add what looks like made up tags. I'm going to revert this edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68048512
viloan (2019-03-12 06:06:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
MikeN (2019-03-28 15:57:29+00:00): Hi, for all these turn restrictions - there are no signs that disallow the turns, and even the police frequently turn left through these intersections.   If this was based on the double yellow lines - South Carolina does not disallow turns across double yellow - they only prohibit passing.   A recent Mapillary trace is at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=34.7787017042994&lng=-82.30762141042447&z=17&pKey=J_dnJ1J2H0Cjyjs0_OFN5g&focus=photo
jguthula (2019-04-01 10:56:51+00:00): Hi MikeN,

Thanks for looking into this edit. The editor added turn restrictions in this case because of double yellow lines. We didn't know this rule is not applicable in South Carolina. Will do more research on South Carolina traffic rules and update our workflows accordingly. Will update my team and make sure this error is not repeated again. 

Please do let us know if there are any such mistakes being generated from our end. We are actively looking forward to engage with the local community and learn more from them.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
divya_sree (2019-07-11 06:06:10+00:00): "Hi Ficky IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the 

"way 640034199
way 676184456
way 676158769"

classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'unclassified'. 

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
geoaria (2019-03-12 13:29:06+00:00): بهتر است به جای جمله Some Edits ، توضیح دقیقی در مورد علت ویرایش نقشه بیدهید تا نقشه کش های دیگر هنگام بررسی موضوع و هدف ویرایش های شما را بدانند . چه به زبان پارسی باشد چه با زبان انگلیسی و....
spiregrain (2019-03-12 10:10:27+00:00): Hi-there MacLondon,

I use this bit of path between the two bits of Oxford Road twice daily - on foot - it's definitely a footpath open to cyclists.   Is there any reason why I shouldn't make it foot=yes as well as making it a cycleway?    Or is it better to have it as a footpath with bike=yes?
MacLondon (2019-03-12 17:52:32+00:00): The default meaning for highway=cycleway is 'a way reserved for pedestrians and cyclists', so it's unnecessary to add foot=yes, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Cycle_Tracks.

However, foot=no SHOULD be added whenever the way was for bicycles only, e.g. the nearby https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551763910

OSM used to render highway=footway differently if bicycle=yes/designated got added, but doesn't seem to do so anymore so visually the map now fails to give any additional information.

Also JOSM's validator has always recommended using highway=cycleway rather than footway wherever cycling is permitted.

Mac
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-12 07:30:21+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
On the area you marked as a park (Cameroon Square) you mentioned it was a pre-paid parking lot in the description tag.

Did you mean to tag it as amenity=parking instead of leisure=park?

If you have any questions, I'm happy to help :)
apm-wa (2019-04-07 14:19:23+00:00): These are not "bus stations", they are "bus stops" (остановки, не станции).  Thanks for adding to the map!
Dramader (2019-04-07 15:52:29+00:00): Sure, bro. You are right. Just looked at the other bus stops on this street. Think that the problem in displaying label stop in the form of a pedestrian. All used to seeing the label of the bus and not the pedestrian.
(Конечно, бро. Ты прав. Просто посмотрел на другие автобусные остановки на этой улице. Думаю что проблема в отображении ярлыка остановки в виде пешехода. Все привыкли видеть ярлык автобуса а не пешехода.)
apm-wa (2019-04-07 17:29:39+00:00): You might want to make that suggestion at https://help.openstreetmap.org/tags/ideditor/?sort=mostvoted
user_5359 (2019-03-15 16:33:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your node. You take some very unusual keys of the address information.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-12 21:50:15+00:00): Hallo,
wenn die Baustelle einseitig befahrbar ist, dann setze doch einfach kein hw=construction
vg
elle67 (2019-03-14 15:05:36+00:00): Hallo,
hab es geändert!
Gruß
elle67
AlaskaDave (2020-05-24 07:32:06+00:00): Hello,
I see you have added ford=yes to some places where waterways cross highways in my neighborhood. The wa you used that tag is incorrect. A "ford" is a place where a vehicle crosses through a waterway, not over it. In other words, there is no bridge or culvert. The wheels will get wet in such a crossing.

Just because the original mapper didn't place either a bridge or a culvert at this crossing does not mean it is a ford. He or she may not know what sort of crossing it is and left as is until such time as it could be checked by a ground survey.

Please review your edits and remove any other fords that look similar to this one . I removed this ford and others nearby.
kreuzschnabel (2019-05-08 13:24:06+00:00): Wieso hast du hier so einen hässlichen Knick in die Brücke gesetzt? Die geht perfekt geradeaus. Die Tempolimits auf diesem Ast zwischen B 277 und L 3046 stimmen auch nicht ganz mit dem überein, was ich heute beim Durchfahren gesehen habe, aber ich habe mir so schnell keine Notizen machen können :)
Lokalfuerst (2019-10-26 21:03:42+00:00): ein Knick war nicht beabsichtigt. Habe das nach den Hinweisen beherzigt. Was die Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen angeht, so habe ich festgestellt, dass sehr viele richtungsabhaengig sind und habe das an der betreffenden Stelle korrigiert.
surveyor54 (2019-03-12 07:18:24+00:00): Ergänzung zum Änderungssatzkommentar:

Tags des NSG "Affelderchen und Rettichbruch von Klein-Welzheim" ergänzt
Dimacn (2019-03-12 10:57:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не используйте описательные названия в теге name. В name заносим только официальные названия, а подробности отмечаются специальными тегами. Пожалуйста исправьте. Подробнее:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
mavl (2019-03-12 15:18:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за интерес к проекту OpenStreetMap. К сожалению, в OpenStreetMap нельзя добавлять данные из карт, защищённых авторским правом, таких как 2ГИС. Ваши данные будут удалены из OpenStreetMap.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:FAQ  
  
Также при создании учётной записи вы приняли условия участия:  
  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms  
  
или по-русски:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms
mavl (2019-03-13 18:02:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Jakka (2019-03-12 08:57:14+00:00): ce si n'est farmland more farmyard. voir info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard
Bytemark (2019-10-18 06:53:50+00:00): Die Mappingqualität ist sehr schlecht.
Sanniu (2019-03-12 08:42:10+00:00): You should put 1 in addr:housenumber and leave addr:street only street name to make it discoverable by automatic applications
Dimacn (2019-03-12 10:54:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. 1. Пожалуйста не выдумывайте названия объектам. Нет таких названий "Внешний дворик" и "Качели". В name заносим только официальные названия. Пожалуйста удалите. Подробнее:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
2. Скорее всего клумбы, вы отметили как landuse=allotments  , это неверно. Т.к. это   садоводческие товарищества (СНТ) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse=allotments  Лучше переделать на leisure=garden  или landuse=grass
mavl (2019-03-13 18:02:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-13 18:02:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Mazda05 (2019-03-12 10:43:02+00:00): подскажите, откуда взята адресация домов в переулке между Ахохова и Катханова? по моей информации большинство домов там отнесено к Бляниховых (бывшая улица/переулок Шогенцукова)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68052535
Dimacn (2019-03-12 11:10:17+00:00): Прекратите добавлять несуществующие объекты и парки. Все ваши правки будут отменены.
mavl (2019-03-13 18:02:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-03-12 19:52:41+00:00): hi, why did you add the tag hazard=dangerous_road

?
GigiNoy (2019-03-13 14:21:54+00:00): Hello,
I created this tag because I think it's importante to warn road users about risk of falling rocks , there is a lot of roads in this case and some are opened.
What do you think about it?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-03-13 14:27:24+00:00): It's not a approved tag, delete it. It's useless to come up with tags that aren't displayed. There's a sign on each of those roads, therefore drivers will be aware of it. In alternative add the traffic sign of rockfall. Do not invent tags that don't exist as its pointless. In the way of the road you can add the tag "note=the text you invented in that tag"