piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RFuser11 (2018-01-11 14:03:38+00:00): Привет, а разве тут (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4544263390#map=19/55.78695/37.65375) висит гдето этот почтовый ящик?
florent_k2 (2016-12-08 05:43:52+00:00): Le bon lien : http://www.croixdunord.com/martine-aubry-ajuste-le-plan-de-circulation_10860/
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:22:19+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:48:25+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
literan (2016-12-09 14:40:19+00:00): Алексей, подскажите, а здесь все же спортивная школа или музыкальная? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4544295489#map=19/55.78542/37.66205 И спортзал к чему относится (там любой может заниматься, или он для учащихся спортшколы)?
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:48:30+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
barigela (2019-03-19 11:47:34+00:00): Hi Yudha Sidhikoro,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 458428650 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Service'. As of now making necessary changes.
Please suggest if it is otherwise 

Thanks in advance.﻿
Riyadi IRM-RV (2019-03-26 08:00:40+00:00): hi barigela. it's my colleague worked on it. i'm disagreed with you. it's should be service or track. 
unclassified used to connecting each settlement in rural area. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified. thanks
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:48:36+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:48:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
tridip1931 (2017-09-01 13:19:29+00:00): Hi
I am doing some editing to your changesets. Please let me know if I do anything wrong.
tyr_asd (2017-01-04 07:47:34+00:00): nice work. thanks!
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:48:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Endres Pelka (2018-06-17 12:32:17+00:00): Other operators are using this pier too. Don't you think it's egoistic to stuff only your company's contact data here?
0000FF berries (2018-06-17 14:03:44+00:00): Hi Jedrzej :) I agree and think this information shouldn't be here on the first place -  it should be on the travel agency shop, which is already mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4572830801/). 

@POSSI TRAVEL
Καλησπέρα σας. Οι πληροφορίες που προσθέσατε (ώρες λειτουργίας, τηλέφωνο, email) αφορούν το πρακτορείο σας, το οποίο έχει ήδη χαρτογραφηθεί (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4572830801/). Ως εκ τούτου θα σας παρακαλούσα να αφαιρεθούν από την προβλήτα. Πληροφορίες που μπορείτε να προσθέσετε στο συγκεκριμένο σημείο αν θέλετε είναι π.χ. ο διαχειριστής (operator). Αν χρειάζεστε κάποια διευκρίνηση/βοήθεια, μη διστάσετε να επικοινωνήσετε μαζί μου.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:48:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Владимир К (2016-12-08 10:05:20+00:00): это вы подъезды обозначили замками?
Aleksandr Varava (2017-02-03 10:21:33+00:00): Да! по другому не знаю как!
Владимир К (2017-02-03 11:23:40+00:00): ну по другому можно поставить османд и ставить заметки, а потом придя домой сразу нормально все оформить на компьютере. Хоть сейчас переделайте, уже 2 месяца лежат зАмками.
Владимир К (2017-02-03 11:24:34+00:00): А еще можно vespucci на телефон поставить и полноценно редактировать с телефона. Но довольно неудобно
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:49:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
kjon (2016-12-08 18:28:11+00:00): hier gibt's in der tat zwar kein hotel aber ein apartmenthaus...

http://www.yellow-house.com
Peer van Daalen (2016-12-08 18:45:23+00:00): Grüß Dich kjon
-
Fast alles was der Typ in den letzten Tagen eingetragen hat, war Unsinn (Bushaltestellen inmitten von Fabrikhallen oder Recycling-Standorte, wo keine sind z.B.) und dann auf teilweise auf Chinesisch.
-
Das ist alles sehr schräg und teilweise hat er damit auch bestehende Bus-Relationen kaputt gemacht.
-
Man kann das ja mal beobachten aber irgendwie ist das alles komisch.
-
Gruß Peer
siberiano (2017-11-20 14:35:21+00:00): Откатываю пакет правок. Это не ваша собственность. Если будете удалять, пишу запрос на бан.
kirpgm (2017-11-22 07:56:53+00:00): Дмитрий Лебедев!
В прошлом году попытка сжечь поклонный крест у кого то не удалась. Вы провоцируете кого то на повторную попытку.  Я сообщу эту информацию атаману Титову Владимиру Михайловичу, а он мужик суровый. Да его ребята недавно с Донбаса вернулись.
kirpgm (2017-11-22 11:28:28+00:00): Дмитрий Николаевич!
Когда что то то утверждаете, удостоверьтесь что это так. А запрос на удаление надо делать на ВАС, но не в интернете.
siberiano (2017-11-20 14:40:47+00:00): тропинка - не ваша собственность. Откатываю пакет правок.
kirpgm (2017-11-22 11:25:30+00:00): Эту тропинку прокладывал Я. По вашей наводке сожгли избушку, теперь этой тропинки нет. Указываете то чего нет.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:49:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:49:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:43:34+00:00): [North Fairview and Commonwealth, Quezon City] rename banks to use common names and current branding
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:44:39+00:00): [Marilao, Bulacan] eliminate location descriptor on BPI branch
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-25 23:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44671830 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
trigpoint (2016-12-08 20:00:00+00:00): Please could you use meaningful comments that state what you have done, Wales is a big place.
Thanks Phil
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
ff5722 (2016-12-08 11:05:32+00:00): Can you explain what is the point of adding the date to a driveway every month?
Is the name change legit?
juhanjuku (2016-12-09 05:22:44+00:00): How did you noticed such small detail :)
But yes, this is driveway to my backyard and I'm using it as timestamp to my changes.
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
siripurapu (2019-03-21 06:27:25+00:00): "Hi majkaz,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 458457770 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'.Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
majkaz (2019-03-21 09:17:05+00:00): Please don't take my answer wrong, English isn't my native, not even second language.

Two points: 
Do you notice, that you are commenting on changeset which is more than 2 years old? It is a bit difficult to comment after such time.

And the second, perhaps more relevant point - the mentioned road seems just fine to me: Unclassified seems to go from AH25 into the settlement. The character doesn't get downgraded just because there are some houses around, just as the AH25 doesn't change classification going through settlements.
This one has SOME houses just at the end of it, for the most part there are none.

Of course, I could be wrong and on the ground, it might be a track, a tertiary, whatever. That is just as it works with mapping from satelite imagery, without any local knowledge.
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:22:47+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
letihu (2017-01-26 14:05:52+00:00): Kannst Du bitte diese 4 nodes an die richtige Stelle schieben. Die defekte wheelmap hat hier zugeschlagen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4544553490/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4544628189/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4544588392/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4544605190/history
Violaine_Do (2016-12-23 13:04:10+00:00): Bonjour Yvanna, Il semblerait que vous ayez fait une grosse erreur de manip', je vous invite à revoir la zone et corriger vos erreurs. Merci, Violaine
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-03-10 20:39:20+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1323449 ?
gileri (2016-12-15 22:13:06+00:00): Bonjour,

Je suis pas sûr de comprendre l'objet de ce changement, peux-tu m'éclairer ?
DimitriMar (2016-12-20 20:42:52+00:00): l'objet est effectivement faux. Il est issu d'une autre modification.
gileri (2016-12-23 21:12:24+00:00): En fait je voulais demander quel était l'objectif du changeset (ma question n'était pas claire en effet), mais c'est lié au travaux apparemment si j'ai bien compris.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:50:04+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
emvee (2017-04-24 16:15:23+00:00): Hi agab29,

Can you have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458465255/history#map=19/48.60799/0.88971?

This way has area set to yes but no other tags,

What is it?

Thanks,

Martin.
literan (2016-12-09 14:21:16+00:00): вы неправильно указываете адреса. Правильно: 14 с1 - да и вообще, на POI их ставить необязательно
nevw (2016-12-08 11:10:56+00:00): Jessie may well be attractive, but this is not a personal map. I was unable to locate the tourist attraction myself, but if there is a genuine tourism attraction at that location and named Jessie then it should remain, otherwise any personal info should be deleted as it does not belong on a map available to all the public.
Is Lachan Lyoyd a Motel or guesthouse or a private residence?
nevw (2016-12-11 07:01:33+00:00): no response - Jessie and Lachlan Lloyd and bench deleted.
Miselajus (2017-05-31 19:55:03+00:00): Hallo.
nach der Löschung des nodes number 10 bin ich schon interessiert,  wer den node reaktiviert und wo er dann landet.
Gruß M.
Miselajus (2018-04-12 20:05:09+00:00): No. 10 ist jetzt in Afrika:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10
Hjart (2016-12-08 11:05:40+00:00): Jeg  anså ikke disse for "too messy" (men jeg har også selv bidraget til dem). Jeg ville endda sige at afstanden til bilvejen (~20 m) gjorde dem til ganske væsentlig information for en cyklist.
Hjart (2016-12-08 18:16:38+00:00): For cyklister vil jeg mene det er værd at vide at man her ikke skal ind på selve rundkørslerne når man passerer dem. Derfor vil jeg stemme for en revertering af denne ændring.
AsgerFrank (2016-12-08 18:49:05+00:00): Det er søreme tit svært entydigt at afgøre hvornår tag- eller tegnemetoden er bedst, men lige i dette tilfælde, omkring rundkørslerne, synes jeg informationen om ikke at skulle ind i centrifugen er relevant. Men det er nu også for at følge princippet om at cykelstier eget tracé, eller med linjeføring i en større afstand fra vejen, visualiseres selvstændigt.
hrmmhahmhm (2016-12-09 13:10:18+00:00): Gør hvad i har lyst til. Jeg følte bare at det var unødigt kompliceret, lidt ligesom ramperne er blevet det med 10 ways og 4 turn restrictions i stedet for 4 ways. fordi der ikke er en tot græs men en spærreflade som midterrabat.
Hjart (2016-12-10 11:51:18+00:00): Jeg er helt enig i at det ofte kan være vanskeligt at afgøre hvilken metode der er bedst, men jeg har efterhånden set og redigeret temmelig mange cykelstier og også haft en del diskussioner med forskellige parter om sådan nogen og i forhold til det synes jeg ikke disse helt falder i kategorien "too messy". Eksempler der efter min mening absolut falder i den kategori er bl.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/556918 og https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43797626 (det sker jævnligt at nye folk begynder at tegne cykelstier i stil med dette og så er det altså godt at have cykelstivejledningen at henvise til). Der er også en stor "gråzone" hvor jeg ærligt talt igen ikke ved hvad der er bedst, ikke mindst fordi vi alligevel skal regne med at begyndere eller udenlandske cykelturister (f.eks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/docschenk) eller andre med diverse specialinteresser (se f.eks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34034684) kan have en helt anden opfattelse end vi generelt har.
Hjart (2016-12-10 12:10:01+00:00): Jeg kan sagtens følge dig i at tingene kan føles lidt vel "messy", men der er som sagt en del forskelligt at tage hensyn til og ofte må man bare acceptere at tingene bliver lidt mere rodede end man umiddelbart bryder sig om. Det kan dog  være besværet værd at tage en diskussion med de umiddelbart "skyldige". I dette tilfælde foruden mig https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43763045.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:50:22+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:50:11+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
crazylost (2016-12-11 07:17:24+00:00): >Если не в этом дело, подскажите

Дело в том, что это не Псков. Это Псковский район, деревня Родина.
mavl (2017-10-21 08:21:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:50:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
fkv (2016-12-08 11:13:46+00:00): bot=yes bezieht sich nur aufs Schließen des Changesets, Rest war normaler Merkaartor-Edit
mavl (2017-10-21 08:20:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53120719 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44109523].