piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-05-06 15:50:25+00:00): Dag Tackset.. Je hoeft op regulierte wegen geen oneway=no toe te voegen.  Alleen als je bang bent dat een andere mapper oneway=yes gaat toevoegen zoals op ee ntwoway fietsrotonde of parallelfietspaden.
MVG,
Eggie
Tackset (2020-05-07 10:09:03+00:00): Top, bedankt voor de tip.
Eebie (2020-08-22 16:13:28+00:00): Check 'Fixme' put on Sentier n° 11 that doesn't seem to exist anymore
jnyssen (2020-08-23 10:10:57+00:00): yes this path still exists; it is occasionally used to access the meadow just north
scratera (2020-05-06 15:52:33+00:00): in questo caso è inutile inserire un punto ma piu5tosto aggiungere al parcheggio già mappato l'informazione
amenity=parking
capacity:disabled=yes e se sai il numero dei posti disabili allora 
amenity=parking
capacity:disabled=2/3/4 o quanti sono
ciao paolo
Mike Baggaley (2020-05-08 12:15:39+00:00): Hi, can you please review way 655922630 which was landuse=residential but now also has a building tag - there is another building on way 23163847 contained within this way, so one of them needs to go. If 23163847 is no longer the building outline, please also remove the landuse tag from 655922630 so that it does not have both landuse and building tags.

Thanks,
Mike
user_2066394 (2020-05-11 22:01:40+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84769954
BCNorwich (2020-05-06 17:20:18+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to let you know that in the absence of a oneway=no tag OSM takes it as implied that the way is not oneway. So in most cases the oneway=no tag is not needed.

Regards Bernard.
geoeg (2020-05-06 17:26:44+00:00): thanks very much.
archie (2020-05-06 15:57:28+00:00): Även denna sjö har bestämd form på lantmäteriets kartor. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10305111
user_5121 (2020-12-28 09:55:49+00:00): Reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2183218 for details.
hemasvn (2020-12-30 16:10:39+00:00): Hi  user_5121, 
As mentioned in the note as there is a sign board at the gate stating "Rear Gate entry to the house is from Aston Lane" I have modified the highway tag. Thanks for improving the edit as per ground reality. Always Happy to learn from the community. 
Advance Happy New year!
Regards, 
hemasvn
Arun Madhavan (2020-05-07 02:58:30+00:00): Thanks for the contributions. It would have been really great if your traces of building captured the footprints of the building properly. Now most buildings have strange shapes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84770404
Aswin Narayanan (2020-05-07 07:19:46+00:00): Thanks for your feedback, since some of the houses has some backward extension, i marked including those extensions. Some of them perfectly visible from the map and others are hidden under the shadow of trees. I'll improve and will make sure the traces are accurate :).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84770404
Britzz (2020-05-10 17:30:12+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est parfait.

Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84770629
Olla_Ko (2020-05-12 15:46:29+00:00): Hi! Could you please provide more details about your edits? It doesn't look like park on satellite images
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84770989
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-27 22:11:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87236585 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in India, including mass deletions such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87227878 .
tanish1980 (2020-05-08 05:21:58+00:00): it better to comment the feature you have drawn rather giving emoji 😇
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84771431
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-27 22:11:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87236585 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in India, including mass deletions such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87227878 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-27 22:12:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87236585 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in India, including mass deletions such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87227878 .
user_2008655 (2020-06-18 04:51:00+00:00): Why revert? Is your edition meaning that "Takeshima" does never exist at all?
Layft Greater (2022-06-08 14:26:46+00:00): Kosta Michail Parpas looks wrong. On aerial it looks like a village. Delikipos village.

Any source of the change?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/733771680/history#map=19/34.91868/33.36188
Montenegro dance school (2020-05-06 18:04:04+00:00): This is temporarly adress.
ara861 (2020-05-20 12:09:54+00:00): Prosze wyjaśnić o jaki "brak budowy" chodzi? Zasadnicza część drogi jest już w trakcie budowy. Wynika to nawet z załączonego linku i dokumentacji fotograficznej na ww. stronie.
maraf24 (2020-05-20 13:31:52+00:00): Z załączonego linku jasno wynika, że trwają prace projektowe, uzgodnienia, przekazywanie dokumentacji, inwentaryzacja itp.
Jeśli gdzieś tam jest budowa, to proszę o *bezpośrednie* wskazanie fragmentu o tym  mówiącego, oraz *bezpośrednie* linki do zdjęć z trwającej budowy.
ara861 (2020-05-20 14:49:19+00:00): http://s14-odcinek2.pl/zdjecia-z-poziomu-ziemi/

Każde zdjęcie opisane. Podany kilometraż lub lokalizacja.
maraf24 (2020-05-20 20:13:50+00:00): Nie ma nic o tych pracach w Aktualnościach.
ara861 (2020-05-20 21:31:06+00:00): Szczerze mówiąc nie jest to ewenement, że prace projektowe prowadzone są równocześnie z pracami budowlanymi. Szczególnie w przedsięwzięciach typu "projektuj i buduj"
maraf24 (2020-05-20 21:37:11+00:00): Znam wiele budów dróg w tej formule i nigdy nie spotkałem się z sytuacją, by prace zaczęły się przed zakończeniem projektu.
Odtworzyłem tutaj budowane odcinki wg stanu na kwiecień.
archie (2020-05-06 23:52:40+00:00): I have reverted your changesets #84772531 and #84772679. 

cs #84772531 has been commented before in cs #84767999. 

In the reverted cs you deviate from what the swedish agency for geodata - Lantmäteriverket - states regarding the names of lakes. 
On Lantmäteriverkets maps - copyrightprotected as well as non-copyrightprotected - calles these lakes Svarttjärnen, Prästtjärnen, Furåstjärnen, Blacktjärnen, Björnåstjärnen, Bergåstjärnen and Hindtjärnen. 

You have - without having given any credible source - changed to Svarttjärn, Prästtjärn, Furåstjärn, Blacktjärn, Björnåstjärn, Bergåstjärn and Hindtjärn. You have stated that it dosn't "feel good" with Svarttjärnen etc. [in comment to cs #84767999]

You may have noticed, that even the other lakes around has names with endings -en or -et. 

Please do keep these names in accordance with the official names. If you are certain that there are other local names for these lakes use alt_name=* or loc_name= respectively.
archie (2020-05-06 23:52:06+00:00): I have reverted your changesets #84772531 and #84772679. 

cs #84772531 has been commented before in cs #84767999. 

In the reverted cs you deviate from what the swedish agency for geodata - Lantmäteriverket - states regarding the names of lakes. 
On Lantmäteriverkets maps - copyrightprotected as well as non-copyrightprotected - calles these lakes Svarttjärnen, Prästtjärnen, Furåstjärnen, Blacktjärnen, Björnåstjärnen, Bergåstjärnen and Hindtjärnen. 

You have - without having given any credible source - changed to Svarttjärn, Prästtjärn, Furåstjärn, Blacktjärn, Björnåstjärn, Bergåstjärn and Hindtjärn. You have stated that it dosn't "feel good" with Svarttjärnen etc. [in comment to cs #84767999]

You may have noticed, that even the other lakes around has names with endings -en or -et. 

Please do keep these names in accordance with the official names. If you are certain that there are other local names for these lakes use alt_name=* or loc_name= respectively.
Krullus (2020-05-07 05:23:40+00:00): I will wait for lantmäteriet too answer my message. I do have better source than "feels good" that I stated. In older maps as ekonomiska kartan and generalstabskartan the name of the lakes are svarttjärn, prästjärn etc. I also is born and raised in the area and I have never heard someone speak of them with the -et. Even though it says with the -en in lantmäteriets reacent Maps doesn't mean it is right. Does all there older map got it wrong? Why don't we change the name oh Härlanda tjärn too Härlanda tjärnen and Göteborg to Göteborgen? That is because it's wrong.
Krullus (2020-05-07 06:02:49+00:00): By the way i do not mind the name ending -et and the name of the agency is lantmäteriet. 
found some pictures (links below) on local signs after googling it and you get far more hits with the names without -en. please look at the older map! however the generalstabskartan do name Prästtjärn Presttjärn but that is just an older spelling. Don't find the lakes in häradskartan but the names on other lakes also ends  without -en like stentjärn. Do you have another better source then lantmäteriet's recent map ?
httpss://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/XuH3bnjcG7qPNDVi2xeowoQLB6gx0LB8hSO8eBHjxlnjCMByr_2PVbAidFljBHR1hwvIhxZGm9VPiyp8BBkduqZ49-3WEWOIgzbi8xC7mZGya36PtHqrmvNORQa2RPagZrA

https://cdn2.cdnme.se/3989481/9-3/img_8230_54cd7fb39606ee63dca36802.jpg
archie (2020-05-07 09:29:23+00:00): You could use old_name=*
Krullus (2020-05-07 11:56:33+00:00): Why did you switch the English? It okey by me though.
Shouldn't a map be for the people and should't the names represent the name used by the people?  Roads nearby are named by the "old" name shouldn't that change too then? Just curious are you from Partille aswell and do you have local information? Btw. Google maps uses the names without -en. Who say that lantmäteriet is an absolute truth? Even though they do a really good work they can be wrong sometimes. 
My personal thought and some friends (also locals) are that the name should be without -en. I do think there is something wrong with the names in lantmäteriet's recent map or that someone has taken a really weird decision. I hope to get an answer from lantmäteriet soon.
archie (2020-05-07 12:33:05+00:00): I did switch to English, because I suspect that your rather sloppy cs would be of intrest for the DWG. 
The only names, which come from a - as far as I know - non-copyright source are from lantmäteriets maps. 
If you know of any established (that is really established, not only known by you and your friends) local name, please put them in loc_name=*. 
If you know of any official name, which differs from lantmäteriets maps and is newer and is from non-copyright protected source than lantmäteriets maps, well use them and state those sources. 
But as long as you do not present any new source, which is non-copyright potected, you are kindly asked to let lantmäteriets names untouched.
Krullus (2020-05-07 16:25:09+00:00): I do need an explanation for dwg because I am not familiar with this there (expect cad-files).
I have told you two different sources and sent you links to local pictures but you haven't looked them up? Too check the other maps easily you can go to kartbild.com but they are accessible through lantmäteriet aswell. Ekonomiska kartan and generalstabskartan is made by RAK (Rikets allmänna kartverk). I do not know however if they are copyright protected or not or which cc-license they have.
I do thank for the other comment about the little wooden bridge that was my bad didn't manage to fix it first. But to say my work is sloppy is rude!.
archie (2020-05-07 17:37:33+00:00): Re DWG: please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

Re sloppy: Yes of course you are quite right. When you changed the names of the lakes in cs #84772531 and later in cs #84772679 after I had raised objections about this in cs #84767999 this was not sloppieness but faul intent. 

In this one (1) day you have been active as a user you have ventured around the world quite a bit https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=11135477#2/-17.1/112.3

So the edits you did in this cs (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84778570), I would call sloppy (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800818756) and (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800818754). When you venture that far after just having started editing, you should have acquired sufficient basic knowledge not to make this kind of error (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dislet).
Krullus (2020-05-07 18:57:14+00:00): My change was to give a more accurate mapping of an area i really knnow about. I am born and raised in Partille so i am pretty sure about the names and my friends as well. I am sorry if this has upset you. But i don't like the unprofessional attitude against me as a new contributer to the openstreetmap.
I may have got a some attributes wrong but i have given them the attributes that i thought was right. I am happy if you could correct them to what you are conciderd to be right attribute. 
I have studied geology and did my masters in remote sensing and working with maps daily so i am not new to GIS. About my venture in the world, i have  basically increased the resolution on some of the geometries and some added some building. Your attitude against newcommers to the community is rather rude and who gives you the right to be some kind of authorit?
I am not that eager to change the names of the lakes becasue i would think you will change it back. Please look at the provided sources! I am still waiting for Lantmäteriet's answer. Please be patient, and please consider to look at provided sources.
About the feature island instead of islet, there a lack in swedish language because you say "ö" to small and large "islands".  You may may refere it to "holme" but i didn't consider it too be in the Archipelago. maybe "kobbe" but that feature isn't available. Please help me with the correct therm instead of call my work sloppy. That is just not constructive.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-08 17:35:33+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the Data Working Group here.  To answer some of the questions above:

The advice "Please do keep these names in accordance with the official names." is not correct.  OpenStreetMap should have the _correct_ name in it, which is not necessarily the official one.  In most cases the official one is correct, of course, but in cases where it isn't the usual procedure is to tag the incorrect official name as "not:name" (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/not%3Aname for examples of those) have the correct name in "name", and to also add a "source" tag explaining the source of the actual name.  "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source.  Often people add a note explaining the error in a bit more detail.  There aren't many in Sweden, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693878175 is an example west of Stockholm. 
Re "So the edits you did in this cs (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84778570), I would call sloppy" - I would not.  This is the 14th changeset by this user, and it is not OK to say things like this.  People need time to learn how to edit OpenStreetMap - to find out what works and how to fix things themselves.
Similarly, it is _not_ OK to just revert changes without a discussion first (there are no comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84778570 ).
Sweden (especially the north of Sweden) is crying out for new mappers so everybody who has been editing in OpenStreetMap for some time should be helping new mappers, not just reverting their edits.
Any questions (from anyone) please don't hesitate to ask - you can message me through OSM, mail the DWG via data@osmfoundation.org or just comment here.
Best Regards,
Andy, from OSM's Data Working Group
archie (2020-05-09 01:46:36+00:00): Well this is getting a touch of unseriousness.

May last words on this: 

The newer name-form is Svarttjärnen. On older maps it is Svarttjärn and probably in local folks memory as well. You could of course make yourself a laughing stock considering "Svarttjärn" the "correct" name.


https://kso.etjanster.lantmateriet.se/?e=324907&n=6400050&z=12

https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svarttj%C3%A4rnen_(G%C3%B6teborg%2C_V%C3%A4sterg%C3%B6tland)

https://www.lansstyrelsen.se/download/18.2e0f9f621636c84402719336/1527745491763/G%C3%B6teborg.pdf

Mind you; there is an other lake in Göteborg, tagged in 2008 as "Svarttjärn" but on lantmäteriets maps named "Svarttjärnen". https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23195032. There has obviously been a shift in naming-procedure. 

But some friends of mine, living in this area, are insisting that the truely, correct name is "Svarttjärnet". Should we consider "Svarttjärnet" the "correct" name now?
Krullus (2020-05-09 07:55:23+00:00): About unseriousness about the conversation yes but for the data in the maps no. 
I will still wait on the lantmäteriet's answer.
 Your three sources (links) just point to the same dataset so I could not consider that different sources. I know lantmäteriet's name is with the ending -en and a lot of services get there data from lantmäteriet and would therby get the same names.

There is a lot of lakes, villages etc. with the same name in Sweden.

I don't mean to be rude but I did a check on Svarttjärn(-en) in older maps and i didn't find the name svarttjärnet in the older maps. I have never heard of a name on a "tjärn" that ends with the ending -et. But if you have more sources you can maybe add it as an alternative name.

I could let the names be for now until I get an answer from lantmäteriet and after that I can explain the name better in the attributes of the lakes. 
Happy mapping!
Regards
Krullus
Krullus (2020-05-09 08:05:07+00:00): Thanks for the information about the subject Essin! That cleared things out! I do want the map as accurate as possible in both the therm of geometries and names, I work with maps/geodata etc. almost daily but not in the same way as in osm. I was informed about an mapathon event coming up at the office and got really interested in osm. Hope to be able to provide data to the community.
Regards 
Krullus
archie (2020-05-09 13:54:18+00:00): Well, you are an expert on gis, but have never come across the name "Svarttjärnet"? Could we agree on that this statement of yours is unserious or unreliable? 

Have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=svarttjärnet

For your information: there are: 

27 Svarttjärn
264 Svarttjärnen
12 Svarttjärnet

in Sweden according to osm.
Krullus (2020-05-09 15:14:05+00:00): Thank you for this discussion.
eggie (2020-05-06 19:16:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
rene78 (2020-05-06 17:46:05+00:00): Sure that everybody can use this road?
wireguy (2020-05-06 21:53:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM!   I don't think that Oheb Shalom changed religions or names (please change back) .
I haven't looked at it in detail, but the bridge layer you created seems to be too long.  Only tag the part that is a bridge.
marczoutendijk (2021-03-12 16:37:50+00:00): DWG revert by:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100920510
GOwin (2020-05-16 03:48:00+00:00): Hi Delbert! Thank you for these edits

Have you tried using https://www.caresteouvert.fr/ for doing COVID-19 related updates?
user_2066394 (2020-05-06 17:33:44+00:00): statt löschen besser mit " disused: " markieren, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84774077
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-08 17:06:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800800538/history - is it supposed to be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwastewater_plant ?
Glassman (2020-05-07 14:28:49+00:00): Tip: square building by selecting the outline, then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84775193
Glassman (2020-05-07 14:28:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84775193
L'imaginaire (2020-05-06 18:21:17+00:00): Jammer dat je blijft volharden in de boosheid, dit haalt echt niets uit.
De data working group wordt op de hoogte gebracht (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group)
Colin Smale (2020-05-11 20:22:16+00:00): 1. This is not an administrative boundary (it's the edge of a residential area); and 2. If it was, it would not be admin_level=8 (10 would be more likely).
user_5359 (2021-12-27 17:33:28+00:00): Hello! Please check the relgion value buddisth1 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800809119. Did you mean buddisth?
user_5359 (2021-12-27 17:35:29+00:00): Hello! Please check the relgion value buddisth1 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800810110. Did you mean buddisth?
Leo Slager (2020-05-07 14:15:31+00:00): Dag NHVELD,
Soms lastig te zien: die node zat vastgeplakt aan allerlei andere lijnen.
Die worden dan onbedoeld meegesleept, soms met vreemde gevolgen.
Dat zie je hier:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84777205.
Er zit tegenwoordig zoveel op elkaar geplakt dat ik altijd eerst alle lijnen los maak van elkaar, vóór dat ik iets ga verschuiven.
Ik repareer het even.
NHVELDH (2020-05-08 06:58:14+00:00): Beste Leo,

Hartelijk dank voor je ingrijpen. Ik moest wel lachen om jouw "ik repareer het even". Kennelijk was er heel wat mis. Ik had simpelweg de knoop verschoven; en toen de validator geen foutmelding gaf, dacht ik dat ik klaar was. Ik zal jouw aanwijzingen ter harte nemen. (Ik bewaar alle aanwijzingen en suggesties die ik van mappers krijg, en lees ze zelfs nog wel eens opnieuw.) Ik blijf dingen proberen.
Mag ik meteen iets vragen? Als ik een wijziging upload, en vraag of iemand meekijkt, wie kiest er dan uit wie er meekijkt? Is er een database met mappers, waaruit er een gekozen wordt die in de buurt woont? Dit is louter nieuwsgierigheid, hoor. Nogmaals hartelijk dank voor je steun. Groeten, NHVELDH
Leo Slager (2020-05-08 14:29:06+00:00): verder contect via PB.
richlv (2020-05-08 20:09:54+00:00): Sveiki un paldies par kartes uzlabošanu :)
Būtu jauki izmaiņu aprakstā sīkāk uzrakstīt, kas darīts - ja visi apraksti ir tikai "Labojumi", nav noprotams, kas un no kādiem avotiem ir darīts.
Nagerevnu (2020-05-11 06:49:22+00:00): Sveiki, Varu pievienot. Bet šeit ir uz sava GPX faila pielabots viss (ir publiski ielādēts fails), bet ir problēma ar Relationships - nemāku salikt, lai virs ūdens utt. nebūtu meža, ja varu dabūt, ka nav mežs, tad problēmas ar meža attēlojumu - viņš pazūd. Irt kāda iespēja to pamācīt? Turpmāk, varu Paldies jau iepriekš.
richlv (2020-05-17 07:20:27+00:00): Paldies par atbildi.
iD redaktorā to neesmu darījis, bet varbūt palīdz šī dokumentācija:
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#drawing-multipolygons

Vai ar tādu metodi izdodas?
L'imaginaire (2020-05-06 19:28:26+00:00): Bedankt!
Leo Slager (2020-05-07 14:11:03+00:00): prima zo.
NHVELDH (2020-05-10 09:24:43+00:00): Kennelijk niet gelukt: de naan van de B&B staat nog steeds op de kaart. Volgende week probeer ik het opnieuw.
eggie (2020-05-10 09:41:09+00:00): Het is wel gelukt... maar de rendering loopt achter. Ctrl F5 helpt wel eens..... en geduld :)


MVG
Eggie
NHVELDH (2020-05-10 11:24:20+00:00): Goedemiddag Eggie,

Dank. Ik ben natuurlijk belust op resultaat, maar ik zal mij oefenen in geduld.
Groeten, NHVELDH
NHVELDH (2020-06-08 15:28:51+00:00): Ik zie dat "B&B Amare" echt verdwenen is van de kaart. Ik was niet zeker van mijn zaak, omdat "Amare" nog steeds te zien is op de OSM-kaart in de OsmAnd-app. Maar ik ben nu gerust. NHVELDH