piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2020-08-06 07:56:23+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the reply. There are a few things to fix here:

- I spotted several cases of mixed up tags where key and value do not fit together

- There are many keys and values with wrong spelling like "management discription"

- 'building=school' is not a replacement for 'amenity=school'. If you just map one building, the amenity tag has to be on the building

- the 'operator' tag should be 'operator:type'

- there are some 'category' tags describing the type of school (primary etc.). This should use the key 'school' or, preferably, the 'isced:level'  code

- the source of your data is missing in the changeset comments.
kartler175 (2020-08-04 09:24:46+00:00): Und jetzt? 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.21692&lat=52.31666&zoom=15&opacity=1.00
AndreasMD (2020-08-06 18:25:25+00:00): Hallo Kartler175,
ich war mir nicht bewusst, dass ich die Relationsgrenzen zerschossen habe. Mein Ziel war eigentlich, die Beziehungen der Objekte zueinander zu korrigieren. Kann ich davon ausgehen, dass das Problem gelöst wird, wenn ich den Ring wieder schließe, oder ist das zu simpel gedacht?
VG
Andreas
dx125 (2020-08-07 19:44:11+00:00): Mir ist hier noch aufgefallen, dass es eine Multipolygon-Relation 3533701 gibt, wo der Steinbruch Flechtingen als inner mit dazu gehört, sowie des Weiteren ein Teil des Flechtinger Höhenzugs.
Als Eigenschaften listet JOSM auf: 
power=substation; 
voltage=110000 (!)
Das ist alles sehr merkwürdig hier.
Auch die Multipolygone, die nur aus outern bestehen und sich Segmente teilen mit angrenzenden Multipolygonen.
(Gleise, Steinbruch)
Das finde ich ungünstig.
dx125 (2020-08-09 19:27:32+00:00): Ich versuche die Relationen hier soweit in Ordnung zu bringen, dass OSMI keine Fehler mehr anzeigt und die Dinge normal gerendert werden. 
Bitte keine Parallel-Edits im Bereich um den Steinbruch und die umliegenden Forsten.
dx125 (2020-08-10 06:00:30+00:00): Erledigt. OSMI zeigt keine Fehler mehr dort.
literan (2020-08-10 21:37:03+00:00): а зачем тег туалета-то удалять? верну
superkiria (2020-08-15 15:18:25+00:00): Спасибо.
AgusQui (2021-05-08 07:11:53+00:00): Que es efalcom?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-08-05 13:46:18+00:00): Hi. You've duplicated a few amenities, e.g. you added `amenity=restaurant` to this building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829797055 ), while there's an `amenity=restaurant` node inside it ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6049853007#map=19/52.35348/-7.69867 ).
Alex_457 (2020-08-03 19:18:10+00:00): Source: survey
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2020-08-04 00:28:33+00:00): Bonjour!

Attention lorsque vous supprimez des informations comme celle-ci qui peuvent être utiles même en milieu privé. Vous pouvez simplement ajouter un tag access=private et ajouter informal=yes. Si vous supprimez d'autres informations, les utilisateurs qui les ont ajoutés risquent de les remettre et il faut éviter ce va-et-vient.

Merci et bonne soirée!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2020-08-04 00:35:50+00:00): Voici une info officielle de OpenStreetMap:

- Mapping private buildings, private roads (including driveways), private parking is considered as completely acceptable. Add access=private as appropriate to roads, parkings etc.

(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information)
trigpoint (2020-08-06 14:56:07+00:00): I don't think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833630805 extends to the middle of the road.

Cheers Phil
nw520 (2020-08-10 17:22:10+00:00): Hallo goodidea,
die Änderung des Segments w23517393 führt dazu, dass man von Westen kommend nicht mehr in die Breslauer Straße einbiegen kann, was dazu führt, dass die eingetragenen Buslinien fehlerhaft sind. Momentan ist am Überweg crossing:island=yes eingetragen, meinst du, dass man das Segment in zwei getrennte Ways auftrennen sollte? Auf Höhe der Ausfahrt Saarbasar ist ebenfalls eine Insel, aber zwischen den beiden Inseln ist nur eine Sperrfläche aufgemalt.
goodidea (2020-08-12 21:30:02+00:00): Hallo!
Das war ein Fehler von mir mit dem oneway=yes. Habe es gerade wieder entfernt.

Ich hatte auch kurz überlegt, die Kreuzung anders zu zeichnen, aber ich denke, man sollte sie so lassen. Wird sonst nur wieder ein ziemliches Wege-Durcheinander. Es müsste ja so jetzt alles stimmen.

Ja, da ist eine Insel bei dem Übergang  und dann aufgemalte Sperrfläche – die Fahrspuren sind da optisch/baulich schon etwas getrennt bis Ausfahrt vom SaarBasar ... aber es nur deswegen anders zu zeichnen von da an bis zur Kreuzung ist vielleicht übertrieben und unnötig verkomplizierend.

Danke fürs Fehler-Erkennen!

Viele Grüße!
camelCaseNick (2020-08-08 13:43:26+00:00): Hey,

can you explain to me, why you think this traffic signal in Visalia, CA, US is the Universe theme park in Denmark? I have reverted it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89128729 as your changeset comment suggest, you meant not to add it to a traffic signal. If you indeed meant it, why?

CamelCaseNick
eggie (2020-08-03 22:16:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
De Pit  stond al op de kaart.. De twee extra identieke  toevoegingen heb ik verwijderd.
Website en phone toegevoegd. 
MVG,
Eggie
streckenkundler (2020-08-03 20:22:21+00:00): Hei,

Vielen Dank für deine Edits für das Knotenpunktnetz Landkreis Oberspreewald-Lausitz...  Jeder Komplettierung ist Sehr gern gesehen...

Eine kleiner Hinweis sei mir gestattet: beachte bitte, daß dieses Knotenpunktnetz zu mindestens in Teilen nicht gut ausgeschildert ist. Es fehlt gelegentlich am Knotenpunkt A der Hinweis zum Knotenpunkt B und umgekehrt. Es gibt wohl leider nicht immer eine konsequente bidirektionale Beschilderungen. Ich habe da schon einige Mitteilungen anderer Mapper zur Bestätigung...  und es auch beim Landkreis bemängelt... 

Da sich diese recht jungen Netze hier im Süden Brandenburgs in Entwicklung befinden, wären mir Fotos der Wegweiser sehr willkommen. Auch wenn ich im Nachbarort Lübben wohne, komme komme ich leider nicht überall hin...

weiter so, danke und viele Grüße,

Sven
santon (2020-08-04 06:07:04+00:00): Hallo,
ja, in Bobitz haben wir uns auch gleich verfahren... Ein Foto habe ich leider nicht gemacht, komme auch so schnell nicht mehr hin. Ach ja, beim Kommentar habe ich mich vertippt, den 14-15 habe ich vorher ergänzt.
streckenkundler (2020-08-04 06:30:57+00:00): Moin,

Alles gut... Als ich zuletzt in Boblitz war, hatte der Wegweiser keine Nummernschildchen, auf die er verweist...

Sven
user_3022894 (2020-08-13 14:39:18+00:00): Hi free_as_a_bird,
du hattest hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95110029/history "Metro" zu "Netto" umgetaggt. Kann es sein, dass das ein Versehen war? https://www.metro.de/standorte/schwelm

Aber vielleicht bin ich auch nicht informiert...
Viele Grüße, Lukas
free_as_a_bird (2020-08-13 17:41:48+00:00): Hey Lukas,

danke für Deinen Hinweis, hab's wieder gerade gebügelt - hatte ursprünglich anscheinend einen zu dicken Daumen :D

Viele Grüße
Tobi
user_3022894 (2020-08-14 14:54:28+00:00): Alles klar, danke und Grüße zurück!
felipeeugenio (2020-08-22 01:28:17+00:00): Estimado, el tag edificio es para estructuras, no para todo el recinto.
saludos
user_11422772 (2020-09-02 22:57:24+00:00): Dear user
I would like to know why you remove the French tags
Do you have a problem or hate towards the French language?
Please respect each name tag
It is brought to your knowledge that the State buildings are transcribed in three languages: Arabic, French and Berber
Greeting
eggie (2020-08-03 20:14:08+00:00): Dag Overloon,

Geen rest_aere's hier. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area

Bedoel je wellicht een amenity=benchof een leisure=picnic_table
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-08-03 20:22:45+00:00): removed rest area
eggie (2020-08-03 20:24:35+00:00): Removed 2x community_centre
Overloon (2020-08-04 17:07:13+00:00): Dear Eggie,
I suggested that the 2 gray areas north en south of the green area are parkingplaces (for cars) not restingplaces. Is there a wrong translation in the Maps.me app maybe?

Eric Toonen.
eggie (2020-08-04 19:27:25+00:00): Hi Eric,
Maps.me is very limited...  We see it often.
We prefer a regular editor like iD or JOSM
amenity=parking is okay 
Have fun in mapping.
Eggie
canfe (2020-09-25 08:38:33+00:00): corretto angolo in base a 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction
Mike Baggaley (2020-08-04 13:33:55+00:00): Hi Colin, I think the old airfield would probably be better tagged using 	abandoned:aeroway=runway and other similar tags for other sections. I do not think highway=unclassified is appropriate (there might be bits where highway=service would be OK). Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
Colin Blackburn (BGS) (2020-08-04 13:41:41+00:00): Hi Mike,
Being relatively new to this I am a little cautious in changing existing tags - even though the highway made no sense! But now I know there is a tag to cover this case I will review. Thanks, Colin
user_8334278 (2020-08-03 20:50:31+00:00): new bus bay's, parking lots.
user_8334278 (2020-08-03 20:49:55+00:00): new bus bay's, parking lots.
user_8334278 (2020-08-03 21:05:41+00:00): gone, out of business, closed.
skquinn (2020-08-22 22:38:49+00:00): Please do not delete the building outlines for a business that has ceased operations, unless they have actually been torn down. There is still a building and canopy (roof) at 1998 Willow Road even if there is no c-store/fuel station in operation there any longer.
literan (2020-08-10 21:34:31+00:00): мост уже отмечен, не надо ставить дубли. К тому же это не является attraction для широких масс
Leo Slager (2020-08-05 09:58:12+00:00): Na 7 jaar weer aan het mappen geslagen. Welkom terug bij OpenStreetMap. Misschien overbodig maar Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2020-08-05 10:00:07+00:00): Ik ziw dat je de BING Aerial gebruikt als achtergrond. Pas op want die luchtfoto ligt soms vele meters verschoven ten opzichte van de situatie op de grond. Beter om de pdok 25cm als achtergrond te gebruiken.
kucai (2020-08-04 12:52:38+00:00): Why is oneway? You can see that the arrow at bottom left showing you can go east. While arrow at NE T-junction shows that it is a two way road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88896000
ConnorMaps (2020-08-05 16:55:33+00:00): Hi kucai, 
Maxar Premium and Mapbox show the bottom arrow is pointed northeast and the top-right arrow (also pointing northeast) indicates you can turn left, straight, or right. However, I left the entrance to the complex bidirectional because the arrows show you can enter (and turn right) and exit the complex.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-08-08 13:08:22+00:00): Luis, esse usuario https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88898704 deletou a relação distrito mandacaru que voce havia criado, essa relação estava correta ou ele esta certo?
hsc666 (2020-08-31 15:30:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90199581 where the changeset comment is: Revert due to misuse of name tag.
kucai (2020-08-04 12:49:49+00:00): 463377703.
You do know that we classify roads in front of retail building blocks as unclassified instead of residential. Right?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88896034
Mappuccino (2020-08-05 16:53:44+00:00): Hello Kucai, I agree that the road accesses retail and could be an unclassified road. I will go ahead and reclassify it, thanks.
kucai (2020-08-04 12:47:02+00:00): These roads already have the correct classification before you changed them. 
Roads around the big towers are are service roads. 
Roads around houses are residentials.
Neither are unclassifieds.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88896074
MaptainPhasma (2020-08-05 20:07:20+00:00): Hello Kucai, I appreciate the feedback on the roads in Kampung Aston. That makes sense and I’ll update the classifications. Thank you.
Frans S (2020-08-07 12:50:23+00:00): Thank you so much for mapping here
Unfortunately, your mappings are not that accurate and squared as HOT expect .
I copy on a PM some advises wich might help to improve your mapping skills
Best regards and keep mapping
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 20:04:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3377923

Can you look at this note? Maybe you can help with it even if plenty of time since the edit (if not - then I wish you a happy mapping!)
user_4493657 (2020-08-03 22:27:46+00:00): Ukradkiem znikają, być może znikały lub znikają w określonych sytuacjach pewne dane mapy. W zapytaniu http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/WJb powinny pojawić się "zarchaizowane dane" które były widoczne na mapie jednak z jakieś powodów zostały usunięte. Wedle mojej wiedzy dla tego obszaru brakuje drogi dojazdowej do posesji nr. 1 (być może także parkingu), cieknącego hydrantu który znajdował się nieopodal, ręcznej pompy w okolicy budynku nr. 4 i polnej drogi lub ścieżki pomiędzy budynkami 1 i 4. Te dane znajdowały się w tym obszarze przez minimum rok w latach 2016-2018 sam z tych danych korzystałem.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-28 20:01:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3377927

Can you look at this note? Maybe you can help with it even if plenty of time since the edit (if not - then I wish you a happy mapping!)
Leo Slager (2020-08-05 11:09:29+00:00): Hier is wat misgegaan.
De weg is niet vastgemaakt aan de andere wegen.
Een navigatie-app zal deze bestemming dus nooit kunnen vinden.
Go Map is een aardig speeltje om onderweg de info van een POI aan te vullen. Voor het wat ingewikkelder werk zou ik je toch adviseren om een "echte" editor te gebruiken, bijvoorbeeld JOSM.
Leo Slager (2020-08-05 11:14:58+00:00): De barrier is hier niet vastgemaakt aan de weg.
en zal dus geen effect hebben.
ik verander het even.
aweech (2020-08-04 00:43:41+00:00): Hi,
In this edit you tagged a parking lot as costing 20 euros to use, but this is in the United States. Was this an error, or is the landowner just very eccentric? :)
nosrednakrik (2020-08-05 21:12:43+00:00): Thanks ! Fixed
emvee (2020-08-08 15:00:40+00:00): Hi,

cycleway:left = track mit bicycle=use_sidepath ist nicht korrekt, sehe:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath

und:

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/map/#source=24849&item=3032&class=30329&item=3032&zoom=17&lat=49.7323238&lon=12.1829045&level=2&tags=&fixable=

Martin.
mapper1mapper2mapper3 (2020-08-08 17:34:09+00:00): Hallo Martin,
Danke für den Hinweis, hab das Attribute bicycle=use_sidepath entfernt.
Viele Grüße,
Peter
emvee (2020-08-08 21:14:13+00:00): Hi Peter,

Danke!

Ein Tipp: Schauen Sie sich ab und zu auf http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/mapper1mapper2mapper3 und versuchen Sie einzige items zu lösen, ein guter Weg mehr über openstreetmap zu lernen.

Beachten Sie, dass dies nicht alle von Ihnen verursachten Probleme sind, sondern nur bei Objekten, die zuletzt von Ihnen bearbeitet wurden.

Grüße,

Martin.
rskedgell (2020-08-04 08:33:09+00:00): You have mapped this as landuse=military, however I am reasonably sure that the Environment Agency is not part of the MoD. You could tag the perimeter fence/wall as barrier=* together with landuse=industrial.

This looks a little like tagging for the renderer, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
nlme (2020-08-04 10:01:08+00:00): Thanks for that, I'll adjust it later today. I was trying to show that the area was off-limits to the public.
OldManCelli (2020-12-08 14:47:01+00:00): Can you please help to figure out why this changeset added 833681139, which is a duplicate of 833657455 that was added as part of your changeset:88895154.
wille (2020-10-05 00:13:38+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e tenho apenas uma sugestão para você: evite usar nomes genéricos como "Praça", "campo de futebol", etc. Nós só devemos usar nomes oficiais, pois cada elemento no OSM já tem tags que identificam o que o elemento é.

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88897833
kartonage (2020-08-04 04:25:39+00:00): Hej,

der Trend geht eigentlich eher dahin Rewe, Aldi und Co klein zu schreiben. Grundsätzlich sollte es aber einfach einer nachvollziehbaren Logik folgen. Das scheint bei dir nicht der Fall zu sein (Lidl und DM klein, Aldi und Rewe groß.)
Könntest du mir die Vorgehensweise entsprechend erklären?

Schöne Grüße
Frans S (2020-08-04 11:48:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
Your work is reviewed at random.
Your mappings are rather precise mapped.
Good. Be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
I copy some advises in a PM which might be helpfull
Best regards
Frans S (2020-08-04 09:24:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
You asked for a review.
In general, your mappings are not bad, but needs to be more accurate and squared.
(53 out of 92 )
You ignored also the issues on the issue triangle on the right hand menu, which should be soved before uploading your work.
I copy some advises in a PM to you
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-08-04 09:18:55+00:00): Hello ShylahSutherland.
Thanks for mapping on this project
You asked for a review.
In general your mappings are quite accurate and squared. Just a few buildings are not accurate enought.
Please be sure to square each rectangular building with the Q key in the editor.
I copy you some advises in a PM how to improve your mapping skills.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-08-04 12:59:58+00:00): Hi  On this task I see that you mapped buildings which were already mapped a day earlier
I quess that you did not zoom in far enough on the IDeditor
see this  message

Due to a problem in iDeditor, many buildings/roads are currently drawn double or triple.
Cause is an error in IDeditor which causes the already drawn buildings to remain invisible.
Note the bottom line in iDeditor. There's a blue field in there that says ... If you have hidden objects, you need to zoom in further. It may happen that the field does not disappear.  Then find another task to work on.
Diógenes de Sinope (2020-08-04 05:18:01+00:00): Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap Kc@lahi, deves adicionar a etiqueta 'amenity=prison' à área que representando um edifício que você estabeleceu neste conjunto de mudanças, de modo a designar o edifício como uma prisão (ou cadeia), por favor consulte a enciclopédia do OpenStreetMap para mais informações - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:amenity%3Dprison
Frans S (2020-08-04 09:10:30+00:00): Hello Hibagonsan.
Thanks for mapping here<
I review mappers work at random and noticed that you map clusters of buildings and call it just 1 building.
Each building needs to be mapped individually.
Please don't  include the courtyards in your mapping as well.
I copy you some advises in a separate PM
Best regards and keep mapping
aweech (2020-08-04 00:58:53+00:00): Hello,
I have told you before that when you are making a change to a way, you should modify the way, not delete it and create a new one. Because you ignored that advice, you deleted information that this is an Italian restaurant, and you disconnected the history. Also, #bte is not an informative changeset. 

I'm reverting this changeset and 88898444 where you do the same thing to another building.
EnzoDragon1 (2020-08-04 01:03:10+00:00): Hi, aweech. I am actually so sorry on my behalf. I was in a rush on fixing most things inside of Canobie Lake Park to make it look more accurate to Real Life. As for the #bte, that's for a project called Build The Earth for the game Minecraft being recreated 1:1 scale. Don't worry, I'll try my best to avoid something like this in the future.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-08-08 13:07:12+00:00): anderson, por que voce deletou a relação distrito de mandacaru que outro usuario criou, ela estava incorreta?
iandees (2020-08-04 01:09:24+00:00): Hi! Thanks for making these changes. Can you please use a more descriptive changeset comment? "Map Updates" isn't particularly useful.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88898833
Myazyk (2020-09-14 20:14:47+00:00): Що у тій зоні заборонено чи для чого вона заборонена?
opencarpatia (2020-09-16 22:28:43+00:00): Привіт, це напис на табличці. По карті легко здогадатись що це охоронна зона навколо тунелю для колії з обох боків ;) Сама зона огороджена колючим дротом.
neuhausr (2025-12-05 16:27:45+00:00): Hi, I happened upon your edit, which created a beach entirely within the body of water. As I read the wiki, natural=beach should be the water's edge. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach Sand flats exposed at low tide would be tagged differently. (Since this is a reservoir, I'm not sure if tides are even relevant!) Assuming you might know the area, hopefully you can adjust this accurately. Thanks and happy mapping!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-08-07 22:12:48+00:00): está errado isso, usar u_turn na via, deveria ser uma relação
skquinn (2020-08-05 12:07:03+00:00): Changeset comment got cut off. I think the additional changes were buildings/roofs and probable c-store/fuel stations, possibly some other lane use and lane count edits not otherwise related to the notes.
FinB2000 (2020-08-04 18:50:17+00:00): This changeset needs to be reverted immediately!
Raymond Yap (2020-08-04 20:00:46+00:00): How to do that if change was made with in-browser editor?
FinB2000 (2020-08-04 20:50:38+00:00): I see that you've removed the "water" tags. Please change it back to how it was before.
user_8466505 (2020-08-05 04:31:46+00:00): Reverted.
Supaplex (2020-08-05 14:36:23+00:00): 請問你為什麼要刪除 wikidata 連結呢?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88901365
Supaplex (2020-08-05 14:39:58+00:00): 還在施工，地面樓層還沒有蓋出來
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=25.0173315624&lng=121.5345552292&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=djJHhh9iUrU4P1rPXTp-RA
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88901365
pule (2020-08-24 13:50:46+00:00): Zdravo,
ovo nije ispravno postavljeno "only_left_turn".
Kao za posledicu ima, zabranu vrsenje polukruznog okretanja vozilom na raskrsnici, a okret je dozvoljen.
POzdrav
BrackoNe (2020-08-24 13:52:16+00:00): Trenutak, odmah ću da pogledam.
BrackoNe (2020-08-24 14:02:08+00:00): ispravljeno.
RussNelson (2022-09-05 18:40:49+00:00): Why did you map the never-built extension of NY-5 west of Camillus? None of the "service roads" seem to be used. May I delete them?
DENelson83 (2020-08-05 09:11:10+00:00): You seem to have left a gap in one of the relations you added in this changeset.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-120.79152&lat=51.63931&zoom=18
Jochen Topf (2020-08-06 09:31:14+00:00): The coastline in this area is broken. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=-76.51587&lat=36.88312&zoom=12

Not sure whether it was this changeset or another. Can you have a look?
DoctorSpeck (2020-08-12 16:10:28+00:00): Andre68 fixed my error in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89072035
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88904800
Fanny IRM-ED (2021-06-24 07:45:08+00:00): Hi, KamaoleBeach
I hope you have a great day, I just want to ask, this unclassified road crossing with water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/833736468)  I wonder there is a bridge between water and highway or not? Or do you have any suggestions on what should I do? Thank you

Happy mapping :)

Ola, KamaoleBeach
Espero que você tenha um ótimo dia, só quero perguntar, esse cruzamento rodoviário não classificado com corpo d'água (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/833736468) Será que há uma ponte entre as águas e rodovia ou não? Ou você tem alguma sugestão sobre o que devo fazer? Obrigada

Feliz mapeamento :) (translate by google)