piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 20:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-07 14:41:25+00:00): Wat bedoel je met nvt  ?  Je voegt paden toe en een speeltuin. De speelplaats zit vastgeplakt aan een weg. probeer plakken te voorkomen.
eggie (2017-11-07 14:48:07+00:00): De info van de Leisure=swimming_pool heb ik op de adresnode gezet. Dat vlak op de gebouw is niet helemaal de bedoeling. Graag reactie...
streckenkundler (2017-11-07 20:21:10+00:00): Das ist aber auch falsch, was du gemacht hast... natural=schub und landuse=resisental sind nun Teil von landuse=meadow, was logisch falsch ist. Hier gibt es die Möglichkeit, durch Detaillierung das Problem aufzulösen... Ich hab das mal umgesetzt
RailAir (2017-11-08 10:08:57+00:00): Ich habe verstanden!
Bernd
eggie (2017-11-07 14:50:56+00:00): Prima!!
4004 (2017-11-07 21:34:35+00:00): не совсем понятно удаление и заново рисовка береговой, но ок
4004 (2017-11-07 21:38:36+00:00): еще не совсем понятно, почему тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33116196 полоса поворота не под прямым углом, как вы сделали ниже
mavl (2018-12-25 20:20:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:24:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
KKS (2017-11-07 19:25:07+00:00): Будьте уважніші при редагуванні, і не змінюйте тип доріг коли в цього не хочете робити. 

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485026582#map=18/46.47386/30.67363
Thunder08 (2017-11-12 14:53:42+00:00): А я якраз і хотів так зробити. Це ж не вулиця, а службовий шлях.
KKS (2017-11-14 13:26:09+00:00): І як тоді дістатись вулиці Житкова?
mavl (2018-12-25 21:18:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
4004 (2017-11-07 21:45:45+00:00): ну а камеру то зачем было сносить, она ж в отношении была прописана.
вынуждаете опять задумываться об откате ваших трудов
4004 (2017-11-09 22:11:37+00:00): revert?
streckenkundler (2017-11-07 17:01:16+00:00): Hei,
wieso hast du denn das MP aufgelöst? Das war falsch... richtig wäre es gewesen, die taglose inner-Fläche zu entfernen und stattdessen die landuse=forest - Fläche ind MÜ auszunehmen... Ich würde das umbauen wollen...

Sven
streckenkundler (2017-11-07 20:31:11+00:00): erledigt.
RailAir (2017-11-08 09:50:43+00:00): Danke Sven, da habe ich wieder was gelernt.
Bernd
rene78 (2018-01-12 19:00:52+00:00): Are you sure that this Cranwell Road and Netheravon Road consist of two separated lanes?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:26:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:32:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:05:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-07 15:54:13+00:00): Alessandro, você está importando esses dados?
Qual a origem deles?
Alessandro Musetta (2017-11-07 18:21:35+00:00): Prefeitura Rio de Janeiro. 
GeoOpenData - Cidade do Rio de Janeiro
naoliv (2017-11-07 18:44:20+00:00): Certo. Você precisa coordenar com a comunidade *antes* de importar os dados, para evitar erros como os que aconteceram. Por favor, leia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines e discuta a sua intenção de importação através da talk-br ou outro canal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
===
Right. You need to coordinate with the community *before* importing the data, to avoid mistakes like these. Please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and discuss your intention to import in talk-br or other channel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Nakaner (2017-11-07 21:07:18+00:00): Hi naoliv,

I think that the changesets should be reverted because they do not only violate the guideline but are also of bad quality due to overlaps (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53584508). Do you want to run the revert on your own or shall I help you? I would suggest to use complex_revert.pl.

Best regards

Michael
naoliv (2017-11-07 21:12:04+00:00): @Nakaner I will revert it
naoliv (2017-11-08 01:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53594063, 53595661, 53597111 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed buildings import in RJ
mavl (2018-12-25 20:56:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:10:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:27:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:03:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Harald Hartmann (2017-11-07 20:33:14+00:00): Hello Alessandro. As discussed and commented in your other changesets i think you should stop uploading "new buildings" and revert ALL your uploads from the last three days.

E.g. in this changeset you have an intersecting of water and building:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539008610
Nakaner (2017-11-07 21:05:32+00:00): @Harald Hartmann Some members of the Brasilian community commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53584152 It popped up in my monster changesets RSS feed provided by OSMCha.
naoliv (2017-11-08 01:29:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53594063, 53595661, 53597111 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed buildings import in RJ
mavl (2018-12-25 21:40:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
iWowik (2017-11-12 00:48:16+00:00): День добрый! Прочитайте, пожалуйста документацию http://wikipedia.openstreetmap.org о следующих вопросах
1) наименование улиц (порядок слов)
2) о языке, на котором следует писать в теге name.
Для начала посмотрите тут:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Be:Belarus:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8B_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%96%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%9E

Есть еще и другие, а так же форум, где вам ответят на ваши вопросы.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=35
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-07 17:19:17+00:00): Nee .. Dit is echt niet goed. Kijk even wat ik geschreven heb bij die changeset fietspad saxefoonpad.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53584779 Dit was je changeset. 
Niet met access no beginnen. Dat is dat witte bord met de rode rand.
eggie (2017-11-07 17:51:26+00:00): Ook van de footway's foot=yes afhalen en access=no verwijderen. Doe je het zelf?
eggie (2017-11-07 17:52:03+00:00): Je ziet ook aan de rendering dat je de fietspaden op slot hebt gezet.
eggie (2017-11-07 18:20:27+00:00): Je kunt ook specifiek aangeven in editor iD en JOSM of iemand naar je edits wil kijken door het hokje aan te vinken bij: “Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt”
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Harald Hartmann (2017-11-07 15:53:25+00:00): Hi. You have tagged (a - perhaps misspelled - form of) `second chance youth`. Can you tell us something about, what it is and who has initiate it? And why do you use Vespucci? Are there some instructions?

The problem is that some other mappers on St. Lucia tag it too but in different spellings (e.g. `second-chance youth`, `secondchance youth`, `2nd chance youth`, and so on). And none of these keys aren't goot practice, because they contain whitespace characters! Also it's difficult for evaluators to find all these different spellings.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Jul14n (2017-11-08 13:44:09+00:00): Das Label ist falsch. Es wurde eine Lücke im Verlauf korrigiert.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:16:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Markus366 (2017-11-07 20:14:18+00:00): Hallo, 
access=no schließt alle Nutzungen komplett aus. access=no und foot=yes widersprechen sich daher.
Markus
mavl (2018-12-25 21:23:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:23:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:24:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-08 01:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 53594063, 53595661, 53597111 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed buildings import in RJ
mavl (2018-12-25 19:59:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
FTA (2017-11-23 03:27:58+00:00): Hi Troy Spencer,

You've been adding the same name ("MOC LR") to a ton of roads in this area. I can only guess that means Mewbourne Operating Company Lease Road or something like that. Can you talk a bit about the reason for doing this? Is it just a matter that these are private roads? If so, alternative tags can be added that signify that as opposed to giving them all a fictional name.

Best,
Ethan aka FTA
Troy Spencer (2017-11-23 15:31:24+00:00): They are private roads leading to Mewbourne leases. I’m trying to create the roads so that we can create routes for my drivers inside the company. The roads have to be named in order to achieve this and since they lead to multiple locations with different names it’s easier to designate them as MOC LR than by another name
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
keithonearth (2018-01-21 01:00:21+00:00): Thanks for your edits! I've added tags to the Mosque, as you've requested. Here's the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55616594

I haven't used OsmAnd for editing so I can't provide advice on how to use it for adding POIs, but I see you've used iD a few times, and it's really quite good. You can always add something with incomplete tags with OsmAnd and then later, when you're at a computer, add the remaining tags.

I hope that is helpful. If you have any questions, I'm happy to do my best to answer if you have any questions. We could really use some more people editing in Kashmir, especially people who are in the area. I hope you continue to edit.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:25:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:34:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:57:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:18:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:31:29+00:00): Olá, Matheus.
Nesta sua edição você criou 2 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
mavl (2018-12-25 20:22:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_7622 (2017-11-08 12:25:39+00:00): Hallo Durko_freemap!
An der Kreuzung Ailinger Straße/Keplerstraße hast du Abbiegespuren gemappt. Laut heutigem Zeitungsartikel finden bis voraussichtlich 22. Dezember hier noch größere Bauarbeiten statt, so daß hier im Moment keine Spuren zu sehen oder gar zu benutzen sind, und wie es nach den Bautätigkeiten aussieht ist nicht offensichtlich. Hast du hier vielleicht veraltete Quellen?
Durko_freemap (2017-11-08 12:44:54+00:00): Ahoj,
quellen ist mapillary, von 25.2.2017 und 5.2.2016.
Durko
eggie (2017-11-07 18:13:26+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-07 18:15:40+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met de reeds bestaande adresnode
mavl (2018-12-25 19:25:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:53:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:40:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Markus366 (2017-11-07 20:12:26+00:00): Hallo,
für den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539032457 muss die Breite width ein Punkt und kein Komma verwendet werden (2.5 statt 2,5)
Markus
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-07 18:30:56+00:00): De verplichte rijrichting op oneway- no zetten is echt niet goed. yes trouwens ook niet. junction=roundabout geeft al de verplichte rijrichting weer.
eggie (2017-11-07 18:31:15+00:00): Dit was je changeset http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53587400
eggie (2017-11-07 18:36:44+00:00): Probeer niet te snel tags van anderen te wijzigen. het zou best wel eens goed getagd kunnen zijn gezien de namen van de voorgaande mappers. Stuk voor stuk ervaren mappers.
eggie (2017-11-07 18:41:29+00:00): Wonderlijke kruisingen daar met zo'n middengedeelte. Wanneer het geen rotondes zijn zou junction roundabout er ook af moeten. (Daar zit al oneway in. ) Dan kan oneway=no blijven staan. Mag je echt aan beide zijden passeren?
mavl (2018-12-25 21:45:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
highflyer74 (2017-11-09 13:11:01+00:00): Moin! Vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag zu OSM. Kannst Du Dir bitte folgende Relationen noch einmal ansehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7712848 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7715901. Es gibt hier massenhaft selbstüberschneidende Linien und Punkte. Zu sehen ist dies hier: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.39332&lat=51.89832&zoom=18. Wäre es nicht sinnvoller, sich für ein Wegeschema zu entscheiden...?

Gruss aus HB!
highflyer74 (2017-11-09 13:20:07+00:00): PS. Für komplexe Gebilde solltest überlegen, lieber JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) als Editor zu verwenden, da dieser u.a. eine Funktion beinhaltet, die Dich auf mögliche Fehler beim Editieren vor dem Hochladen hinweist. Der von Dir bearbeitete Stadtpark ist ziemlich voll davon...

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
nochwirrererbuchstabensalat (2017-11-10 08:02:44+00:00): Danke, ich habe eben alles berichtigt!
user_5359 (2017-11-07 18:04:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM!! Please notice your area is overlapping herself.