piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:29:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:30:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:52:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:27:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Nakaner (2018-06-09 10:09:03+00:00): Hallo FabianEss705,

du hattest um eine Sichtung gebeten. Der Spielplatz ist zwar in Ordnung, das Tor aber nicht. Objekte benötigen Tags, die beschreiben, was sie in der Realität repräsentieren. name=Tor ist hingegen nutzlos. Es müsste barrier=entrance sein. Könntest du das bitte noch ändern?

Bitte beschäftige dich mal mit dem OSM-Tutorial von Benutzer Kreuzschnabel. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/2/23/Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59660327
whb (2018-06-10 06:58:04+00:00): Über den entfernten Weg verlief der Rundwanderweg 3, ist bekannt wo dieser jetzt verläuft, denn jetzt hat er eine Lücke:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4338879
BikeTK (2018-06-11 11:41:33+00:00): Leider nein, ich stand jetzt nur schon dreimal vor dem angeblichen Weg mit dem Rad und konnte beim besten Willen keinen Durchgang finden. 
Ich kann aber gern mal die Strecke abfahren und schauen, ob ich den neuen Verlauf finde?!
whb (2018-06-16 08:37:48+00:00): Das wäre natürlich sehr gut.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:31:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:52:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:32:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Nakaner (2018-06-09 10:06:42+00:00): sieht soweit gut aus
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59660397
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:49:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
archie (2018-06-08 08:56:52+00:00): Kan det tänkas att bicycle=yes på den nya stigen som du ritat är fullständigt överflödigt? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Default. Jag har raderat denna - här - helt onödiga tagg.
Alexander-II (2018-09-30 14:32:29+00:00): Здравстуйте. Вы в этой правке удалил Cofix. Вы уверены, что его там нет? Он есть на официальном сайте, в 2гис и на яндекс панорамах https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CBBfvScBCB
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59660671
ghost_07 (2018-09-30 15:43:24+00:00): Когда ходил там его не было. Сейчас там не был больше месяца. Может и изменилось что.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:48:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:53:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:23:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:31:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-06-09 14:07:40+00:00): Bedankt voor je toevoeging! Ik heb de Fot'Oeil wat beter beschreven en op het juiste gebouw gezet.
PT-53 (2019-06-29 08:54:45+00:00): Hallo KEAmt192,
im OSM-Inspector werden für diese Linien  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/595380693#map=19/47.73760/10.30994 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/595380694#map=19/47.73757/10.31022 
ein Hinweis ways_without_tags angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.31018&lat=47.73764&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
Sind das wirklich 3 Gebäude und warum trennst Du das Gebäude nicht selbst auf?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-07 08:07:05+00:00): Hallo Hallo KEAmt192, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du nocht reagieren würdest.
Wartende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-28 09:38:19+00:00): Hallo KEAmt192,
es wäre schön, wenn Du nocht reagieren würdest.
Wartende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-05-13 05:02:39+00:00): Hallo KEAmt192,
es wäre schön, wenn Du nocht reagieren würdest.
Wartende Grüße
Nakaner-repair (2018-06-08 11:18:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59665785 where the changeset comment is: Revert deletion of valid data, see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59641806
rurseekatze (2018-06-08 13:45:37+00:00): Nakaner hat ja bereits den gelöschten Haltepunkt wiederhergestellt. Ich habe ihn nun noch umgetaggt und mit seinem früheren Namen "Wittmar" gemäß https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braunschweig-Sch%C3%B6ninger_Eisenbahn versehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59669967.

Die Frage ist noch, ob die Station nicht weiter westlich liegt, das wird in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1419881 diskutiert.
saikabhi (2018-06-08 08:52:47+00:00): Used the wrong changeset comment: Correcting crossing ways in Denver
saikabhi (2018-06-08 08:55:01+00:00): Used the wrong changeset comment: Correcting crossing ways in Denver
R0bst3r (2018-06-11 06:59:59+00:00): Hallo Wanderingstar,
der abgeschnittene Name war kein Problem an den Daten, deine Änderung hat somit wenig gebracht, außer, dass der Name nun auf bestimmten Zoomleveln nicht mehr an der Grenze einer Kachel liegt (an anderen dafür ggf. schon). Letztendlich war es ein Renderproblem, das sich irgendwann von selbst gelöst hätte.
Viele Grüße
mavl (2018-07-20 14:00:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:45:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
corfede (2018-06-22 17:38:30+00:00): In pratica si tratta di un pozzo e non di una cisterna? Saluti, Federico
mavl (2018-07-20 13:58:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:44:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
atcomapper (2018-06-08 10:48:47+00:00): Bemærk venligst at dette ikke er en korrekt måde at angive en anbefalet hastighedsgrænse på (altså en blå tavle med hvid tekst). Om anbefalede max-hastigheder benyttes tagget maxspeed:advisory. Jeg har rettet vejstykket - tag lige et kig på det, så kan du se, hvordan man angiver det korrekt.
Harry_MJ (2018-06-09 14:54:29+00:00): Ahh, ja, selvfølgelig, havde ikke opdaget at man kunne vælge noget andet i StreetComplete, tak :-)
Hjart (2018-06-08 10:49:56+00:00): You created a dublet of this restaurant, so I've deleted your contribution
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-09 17:25:26+00:00): This is an inappropriate place to post ad copy.  OpenStreetMap is not your personal spam site.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59663132
pio2_122 (2018-06-10 08:22:17+00:00): ICAO code has been removed because it doesn't exist... Did you check it on ais.pansa.pl ? I did. This is ex military airport, now it's just training airstrip used by the Air Forces school.
jan_olieslagers (2018-06-10 08:41:17+00:00): OK, thanks.
abakus_uploader (2018-06-08 22:33:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2018-06-08 10:07:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
zors1843 (2018-06-08 11:19:33+00:00): Luc,
Bij AGIV staat die weg ingetekend als "Stijn Streuvelsstraat".
Als er geen naam aan toegekend is, dan ook niet "dienstweg" vermelden.
Mvg,
Georges
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-06-09 14:13:41+00:00): Luc, Zors,

Ik paste de weg aan naar 'Driveway', op de luchtfotos zijn het idd duidelijk garageboxen.

Aangezien GRB/Wegenregister ook een naam vermeld, heb ik die terug eropgezet. Lijkt me een mooi compromis.
letihu (2018-10-13 20:43:19+00:00): Ein Tor würde ich so
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/595421830/history#map=19/49.01754/8.47596
nicht mappen ;-)
Leider ist es auch noch doppelt
Hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/595421838/history
schon einmal zu sehen.
Hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1774449510/history
kannst du es besser gelöst sehen.
Diógenes de Sinope (2018-06-08 14:59:59+00:00): para este elemento, você designou a chave 'addr=city', como 'Bairro São Paulo, Luanda', a chave mencionada só deve ser usada para se referir à cidade na qual o elemento está localizado (Luanda), no entanto, acrecentaste superfluamente o nome do bairro, se você souber a delimitação desse bairro, podes usar a ferramenta de 'área' para designá-lo com a chave 'place=neighbourhood', como essa chave não aparece visualmente no mapa, também podes adicionar um 'nó', de preferência no localização central no bairro, usando a mesma chave, dessa forma, quando o elemento for procurado, além do nome da cidade, o nome do bairro onde o elemento está localizado, também será apresentado dentro do endereço completo do elemento [ https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=en&tl=pt&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.openstreetmap.org%2Fwiki%2FKey%3Aaddr&edit-text=%E8%81%AF%E5%90%88%E5%9C%8B%E9%9B%A3%E6%B0%91%E4%BA%8B%E5%8B%99%E9%AB%98%E7%B4%9A%E5%B0%88%E5%93%A1...&act=url ]
eggie (2018-06-08 11:22:17+00:00): Construction secondary heb je er nog op laten staan. Dat "moet" ook weg.
pitscheplatsch (2018-06-09 06:45:29+00:00): Hi zxz_cn, welcome to OSM.

Could you describe what you tried to map here? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59664727
eggie (2018-06-08 11:29:36+00:00): Vaak staan er op wegen busroutes in een routerelatie. Die is nu onderbroken. Zodra je ziet dat er een routerelatie in het geding is kun je het beste hulp vragen op het forum. Met iD kun je niet werken aan een routerelatie, want die gooit de hele volgorde door de war. Dit kan alleen met editor JOSM.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Ik kijk even of ik simpel de busroutes kan herstellen.
eggie (2018-06-08 11:45:51+00:00): Busroutes hersteld, maar er loopt nog een busroute met hetzelfde nummer 106 dwars doorheen. Ik vraag even op het forum of iemand er nog naar kijkt.
eggie (2018-06-08 11:51:05+00:00): Zie forum.. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=702699#p702699
Commodoortje (2018-06-08 17:06:27+00:00): Hoi Mark,
Misschien heb je het per ongeluk gedaan, maar je hebt een stukje van het Rokin aangepast, waardoor routering is verbroken.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mmhu5pve59s58xh/2018-06-08_18-59-03%20Rokin.jpg?raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hmnkj0p1eiyat7w/2018-06-08_19-04-43.jpg?raw=1
Ik heb het teruggedraaid.
Laat even weten of je deze mutatie bewust had doorgevoerd.
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 11:16:18+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 11:23:45+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 11:24:02+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 11:26:20+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
eggie (2018-06-08 12:25:09+00:00): Ik kan alleen niet zien hoe die busroutes liepen. Rijdt buslijn Syntus 1 visa versa hier? Nu nog alleen van oost naar west?
Het probleem met die reconstructies is dat er vaak OV routes overheen lopen. Je zou het op het forum neer kunnen leggen. Ik had net ook iets aan de hand met een onderbreking door een andere mapper.
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 12:58:40+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 12:59:39+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
Polarbear (2019-03-25 17:38:12+00:00): Hallo Chris_BB,

ich finde maxspeed auf so kurzen Stücken auch nicht sehr sinnvoll, allerdings entsprechen sie der StVO/innerorts.

maxspeed gibt ja nicht an, wie schnell man fahren _kann_, sondern wie schnell man fahren _dürfte_.

Die 30 lm/h von dir sind jedoch frei erfunden, sofern sie nicht so ausgeschildert sind.
Chris_BB (2019-03-26 15:58:05+00:00): Hallo Polarbear,
die maxSpeed in der Gegend beziehen sich auf die Novelierung der Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung. 
Man hat die maximale Geschwindigkeit der einiger Hauptstraßen in der Gegend von 50 km/h auf 30Km/h gesenkt.
Sie sind auch vor Ort ausgeschildert, sofern dieese in den letzten 5 Monaten nicht rückgängig gemacht wurde.
Dadurch gelten die 30Km/h natürlich auch für die "Übergangswege" zwischen den Straßenseiten, sowie kleineren aus Mapping Gründen gesetzten Straßenfragmenten.
Gruß
Chris
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 12:59:49+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 13:00:10+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 13:00:14+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 13:00:18+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
LucFreitas (2018-06-08 13:00:22+00:00): IMPORTAÇÃO - uso do solo de Mantenópolis - dados do GEOBASES - tratados de acordo como projeto na Wiki Capixaba de Uso e Ocupação de Solos
Negreheb (2018-11-22 10:28:58+00:00): Hallo tuttifrutti11, 

ich frage interessehalber, wie bist du zu den Namen bei den ganzen Gebäuden gekommen? Es ist ja in Österreich eher unüblich, Namen wie "Gendorfer" oder "Stoffler" bei den Adressen zu verwenden.

Ist das alles durch Vor-Ort-Survey entstanden? Wenn ja, respekt und danke für deine Arbeit :)