piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Enock4seth (2022-09-10 22:59:56+00:00): Thanks for mapping. I have moved the name to this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10014212504 works best to have the name on place=* node near a major road.

Can you help clarify the relation to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1794371185 as the names look similar with different locations.
ameziol (2022-09-12 22:46:15+00:00): hej, cała ulica Szpitalna jest po twojej edycji przesunięta

https://imgur.com/a/y2hF1WR

poprawię to, ale uważaj bardziej następnym razem
gabinetpsychiatra (2022-09-13 05:12:45+00:00): Dziękuję za korektę. Przepraszam
gurglypipe (2022-09-10 16:44:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

You can add more than one static caravan per edit. Doing so, and providing a descriptive comment for your changeset, will help others in reviewing your work and understanding what changes have been made and why.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks, and happy editing!
Enock4seth (2022-09-10 12:13:54+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for mapping. Chps compound is better tagged with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhealth_post
BCNorwich (2022-09-12 09:31:05+00:00): Hi, the tap is positioned in the middle of a road, could you please reposition it. Thanks.  Is it drinking water? Advice is given here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=drinking_water
user_16720371 (2022-09-12 09:34:28+00:00): The drinking water tap is next to the road that goes through the campsite where the tents are. It's only a campsite road that people who are camping use. I take it you've never been before..
BCNorwich (2022-09-12 09:59:22+00:00): Hi, You're right I've never been there. It would be good though for visitors to know if it drinking water and precisely where it's located. If you know the area you could easily tag it to help folk even more.

If you can describe the details I could do it for you.

Regards Bernard.
user_16720371 (2022-09-12 10:13:49+00:00): That's the exact spot pal. I go this campsite several times a year so know it like the back of my hand. Thanks for your offer though.
Allison P (2022-09-09 23:13:44+00:00): Again, you have duplicated address data. You also haven't responded to my changeset comments. Please do so.
FoodPanda_Dyllan (2022-09-09 23:44:43+00:00): Even though there are address in the building, I still usually put an address inside the nodes with their unit numbers. I believe there aren’t correct way, but if you think if it’s a redundant data you can remove them. It’s for mapping application such as Magic Earth makes the address for the nodes much better with search results.
Allison P (2022-09-10 00:35:23+00:00): The correct thing to do is add the business tags to the address node. If the business goes under, you can just remove the business tags and leave the address. Hope this helps.
ruugie (2022-09-11 21:17:41+00:00): It is disgusting that you even create so large changes with your usual changeset comment "updates".
Martin868 (2022-09-12 09:58:35+00:00): Sorry the comment is terse. I didn't think there was anything worth review or debate. But if you see any mistake in the edits let me know, I always follow-up  on my work and correct it when needed.
NeuronBasher (2022-09-09 16:47:49+00:00): For more context all of these edits are involving Degenhart Park and most features inside of it
yasslay (2022-09-09 16:52:41+00:00): Hello!

Please include a description of what changes you have made next time as it is considered as good practice (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments).

Kind regards,
yasslay
impiaaa (2022-09-10 15:44:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. Even though the business doesn't operate here anymore, lots of the tags it had, like the address, are useful and shouldn't be removed.
bxl-forever (2022-09-09 22:09:03+00:00): Hello, momozza,

I think you might improve your changeset titles a little.  It will make it easier for people reviewing the map.  (Yes, some other mappers are routinely looking at the list of all recent changes in a given area.)

If we open the list of changes and we see things like "Was there for a few days", "I walked by there and took a few pictures", or "Local knowledge", there is absolutely no way of knowing what you did on the map.  It will then require to investigate every changeset one by one.

On this one, I would suggest something like "Added a few restaurants and bars in downtown Sarlat-la-Canéda".  Feel free to write it differently, as long as someone who will see the list of changes will quickly understand the overall content of the changeset.

Upon uploading, you might also fill the "source" field and use it to mention that it was during your trip.  (Thanks for mentioning you were there, because changes obtained through a real survey are globally seen as more reliable than pure armchair mapping.)

Hope this helps.
momozza (2022-09-10 08:36:31+00:00): Thank you, this is very helpful! I didn't really know what it was for, so your advice is very much appreciated.
emersonveenstra (2022-09-09 17:26:11+00:00): Hi, the address does not match the building you added it to. Please double check and either add the information to the correct building or change the address to match. Thanks
emersonveenstra (2022-09-15 11:50:44+00:00): Reverted for vandalism in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126221136
u\t\osm (2022-09-10 09:23:10+00:00): Hier ist kein Trinkwasserspeicher und kein Gebäude. Der Trinkwasserspeicher ist daneben, im Eingezäunten Grundstück. An dieser Stelle befinden sich ausschließlich 4 PKW Stellplätze.
hsc666 (2022-09-10 09:29:51+00:00): Dann trag die Dinge doch bitte so ein, wie sie OTG sind! Mich hatte lediglich der Misuse vom name-Tag genervt, habe sonst keine OTG-Kenntnisse.
Frans S (2022-11-01 13:33:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
It is not necessary to map all traces within farmland which only gives access to farmland. 
When it also gives access to farms etc. use Unclassified or service tag,
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125990547
jjkola (2022-09-09 20:09:36+00:00): Duplikaattipiste on selkeä virhe, mutta en ollut täysin varma duplikaatti-kevyen väylän osalta (siis, että kumpi data oli oikein), mutta toisaalta jos jäljelle jäänyt data on väärin, niin joku joka on käynyt paikan päällä voi korjata sen oikeaksi (tai jos itse satun menemään uimahallin ohi, niin voin tarkistaa sen). Ilmakuvat ei kuitenkaan näyttäisi vielä päivittyneen vastaamaan MML:n peruskarttaa vastaavaksi.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125990792
Frans S (2022-11-22 11:53:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark.
When you add highways, please tag them accordingly and connect them on crossings to other roads.
Here you did not tag the (unclassified) highway.
You also added a few straight tracks, without any proof of a trace on the ground. Please don't map like this.  (This is not a playground)
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125991248
literan (2022-09-11 20:23:32+00:00): это значения по умолчанию, они не нужны
treestryder (2026-06-30 03:50:13+00:00): Please stop using cycleway, where path is more appropriate.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan
Trail_Caretaker (2026-06-30 14:17:36+00:00): I am guessing you found an old edit?  I am thinking that I have changed the way that I edit for that situation now.  Just so I don't assume.  What trail are you speaking of?  I only see a large rectangle box for a good portion of Pontiac area where the edit was made and there are multiple trails in there.  Can you send my a Google map pindrop or something that would help me pinpoint the trail?  thx
treestryder (2026-06-30 20:48:52+00:00): I am unsure exactly which of the ways in this changeset that it was. But it caught my eye as it was made following my correction of it from being a cycleway to path.
Onward and upward.
It seems there are quite a few "cycleways" in that area that are more likely multi-use paths, often signed/legislated giving foot traffic the right of way, which could use some cleanup.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?template=key-value&key=highway&value=cycleway
Adding foot=designated might help with some routers... but otherwise, a cycleway means no foot traffic.
Whereas, adding bicycle=designated is redundant.
Trail_Caretaker (2026-07-01 19:08:30+00:00): If cycleway means "no foot traffic", then I can't think of a single one off hand.  Would you please give me an example of where bikes can go but not foot traffic?
treestryder (2026-07-03 03:03:58+00:00): I just had to fix it for the same reason, but here is one.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106977549
On Mapillary, beneath my wife's bicycle, you can see the "No Foot Traffic" icon painted on the asphalt.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/treestryder?lat=42.73145281518998&lng=-84.48980637341799&z=19.9&pKey=1008811070287027&focus=photo&x=0.4461298974495695&y=0.5204404929895309&zoom=0
Eventually, I will steal a moment to fix the rest of the path. Where some parts are split like this, some parts are segregated, and most of it unsegregated.
eggie (2022-09-11 09:13:19+00:00): Dag Pyronick.. Het is een beetje dubbel op.
De ijsclub staat ook al op het clubhuis. Je zou 
ckub=sport stond nog op de landuse grass. Die heb ik maar even overgezet.
Om wat te zien van  de ijsbaan heb ik de baan en het middelste stuk gras in multipolygonen gezet.
Paarkeer ctrl-f5 voor het effect.

In OSM maken we geen adressen aan op gebouwomtrekken. Er is al een adresnode. Beter dat adres verwijderen en wellicht alle info naar de adresnode.


MVG
eggie
Warin61 (2022-09-12 01:03:39+00:00): Hi,
Hi,
The JOSM validator would have informed you that this way 1093226716 crosses itself. That should be fixed before you upload it.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.34993&lat=-35.10750&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways for a QA tool that also identifies it as a problem.

Your source is not specific, imagery with the best resolution and positional accuracy in this are is the  DCS NSW Imagery. 

Please pay attention to those JOSM validator errors and warnings, they help to improve mapping.

I shall leave this for you to fix.
Warin61 (2022-10-19 23:10:09+00:00): No response.
ElliottPlack (2022-10-04 16:17:37+00:00): Thank you for working on my challenge! I see you have completed all of these. Great work.
kasztelan111 (2022-09-14 12:12:43+00:00): nie ma takiej ulicy w Warszawie, proszę nie dodawać wymyślonych nazw
NieWnen (2022-09-14 13:00:19+00:00): Wycofałem.
user_14531766 (2022-09-10 10:25:59+00:00): I accidentally added the "review_requested" tag. Fixed all mistakes of this edit I could find in other changes.
muralito (2022-09-11 21:04:07+00:00): ¿Tenes referencia a la normativa que cambió el nombre?
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-18 19:29:34+00:00): Please do not add/change roadways to cartpaths.  They are clearly roadways.  Portions of this changeset are being reverted.
lyctkel (2023-11-28 15:30:09+00:00): Hi Threore,
opening_hours=Wo
looks strange. 
Did you mean
opening_hours=We 
and do you know more exact opening hours?
Regards,
lyctkel
Threore (2023-11-30 06:40:23+00:00): Hey Lyctkel, that's indeed supposed to be opening_hours=We, I wrote the Dutch weekday by accident. I asked around and the opening time is 21:00.
lyctkel (2023-11-30 13:49:15+00:00): Thanks.
giggls (2022-09-10 08:35:03+00:00): Hallo,

ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass dieser Wildnis-Campingplatz mitten in einem Dorf neben einer Bushaltestelle so nicht existiert.

Kannst Du da was zu sagen?

Gruss

Sven
Interteutones (2022-09-10 17:06:58+00:00): Hallo und Danke für den Hinweis.
War ein unbeabsichtigter Eintrag von mir. Ist gelöscht.

Grüße
Jürgen
DaveF (2022-09-10 11:53:13+00:00): Is this intended to be the final layout?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=19/51.08835/-1.16358
Railwayfan2005 (2022-09-10 21:32:40+00:00): I think I have the connections between lines correct but I expect the physical locations will need tweaking when some better photography is available. Platform 2 needs to become a shape rather than a line.
eggie (2022-09-09 19:54:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  fiets=yes hoeft niet op een fietspad  Dat is default.
Ik heb sidewalk=left toegevoegd.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-09 19:56:54+00:00): horse yes verwijderd. Ruiters mogen volgens de wet niet op een fietspad.
eggie (2022-09-09 19:59:44+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. Alle begin is moeilijk.
Op een wandelpad mag je niet fietsen. welk bord staat hier?
motor_vehicle=no is default. Svp niet op alle voetpaden dit gaat bijtaggen. 
Wanneer er geen G7 bord staat zou het een highway=path kunnen zijn Dat routeert wel voor fietsers.
G7 bord (Rind blau  met de wandelaar met kind is footway.. Geen bord dan path
gr eggie
eggie (2022-09-09 20:06:59+00:00): Ik heb het even in highway=path veranderd. 
Volgens mij hebben ze er ooit een woonerf van gemaakt. Staat er ergens een paaltje om auto's te stoppen?  barrier=bollard  
Gr eggie
Jakka (2022-09-10 18:52:43+00:00): attention aerial imagery are changing with the angle of taken images, use PICC layer ;)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-09-09 19:41:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125611044, 125611106, 125611160, 125611189, 125611233.
eggie (2022-09-09 20:00:18+00:00): Dit is oke..
julcnx (2022-09-11 08:23:17+00:00): thanks for your contributions! what is the HOT project for this task? I do not see any public project currently running in Thailand.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125994745
@chm (2022-09-09 20:07:15+00:00): Es gibt dümmere Gründe für einen Änderungssatz… :-)
habi (2022-09-09 20:09:17+00:00): 🤪
bxl-forever (2022-09-09 21:50:50+00:00): Hello,

Could you please consider adding a proper title for your changesets.

It looks like your latest changesets are (semi-)mechanical edits aimed at adding surface=asphalt to ways tagging as highway=motorway.  Am I right?

It’s perfectly fine to make such edits but it would be appreciated—and would also save time for your fellow mappers who are monitoring recent changes—if you could briefly explain what your changeset is about.

"no comment" sounds a bit like "it’s none of your business" :-(

Thanks in advance.
user_8101879 (2022-09-10 14:06:09+00:00): Hi,

Be careful, the role for water source of a river/stream/canal is not source but spring.

I fixed the relation Wallop Brook.

Best regards
4KK (2022-09-10 22:17:05+00:00): Is it? Provide evidence!
citrula (2023-04-21 11:11:11+00:00): Hello echostatic,

If this building is still standing, it might be a good idea to readd the GNIS ID from the removed Dill School node.
echostatic (2023-04-21 14:23:54+00:00): The building was completely torn down and replaced by The Girls' School of Austin in 2013.
Dodko (2022-09-15 09:18:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27672692/history
Telefón sa uvádza v medzinárodnom tvare +421
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
complete_gth (2022-09-10 11:43:29+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier (bei der Fahrschule) Fahrschule=Aksoy hinzugefügt, ich weiß nicht ob das so gewollt ist, da es bisher Fahrschule=* nur 1x gibt.

VG complete_gth
hotteliene (2022-09-10 14:46:01+00:00): Moin,
danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe die Fahrschul-Merkmale von Gebäude Nr. 4 lediglich auf Nr. 3 verschoben, denn da ist die Fahrschule untergebracht, nicht in Nr. 4, wie es in OSM eingetragen war. Die Hausnummer kann man auch im Impressum der Webseite der Fahrschule nachlesen.

Viele Grüße, Hotteliene
flo2154 (2022-09-10 10:31:21+00:00): Die Praxis wurde vor 9 Tagen schon von dir hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9993209864

Da dort die Informationen ausführlicher sind, habe ich diesen POI gerade wieder gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126009806

Bitte beachte, dass es einige Zeit dauern kann, bis Änderungen an der Karte in OSMAnd übernommen werden.
ruugie (2022-09-09 21:26:50+00:00): What have you updated here?
user_17084311 (2022-09-09 21:30:00+00:00): Pathways
ruugie (2022-09-09 21:28:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093247614 for example is not a good way of mapping: The overlays may work in this renderer, but are topologically WRONG.
silversurfer83 (2022-09-10 12:35:45+00:00): Und wieder möchte ich Dich auf diese Seite und ihren Inhalt hinweisen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
mueschel (2022-09-10 11:19:20+00:00): Hi,
it seems this import of data went quite wrong. 

- almost all of the tags are either not used in other places or are used in the wrong way

- there is no link and source given us mandated by the import guidelines
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
mueschel (2022-09-17 12:29:33+00:00): I'll revert this data for now. If you plan to add this information again, please make sure the import follows our guidelines and uses proper tagging of all the objects.
Wava Stella (2022-09-17 15:03:36+00:00): @mueschel, I have just seen this. I believe the data has proper tagging. Can you share with me what is misaligning?
mueschel (2022-09-17 15:10:44+00:00): That'll be a huge list:

- not following the import guidelines (adding source, documentation, link to Wiki)
- 'name' is not used for descriptions
- coordinates are not added as tags
- 'height' is definitely wrong
- county, district, install_year, pay, photo_url, precision, pump_system, subcounty, village are not known tags
- 'usage' is only used in another context
- 'parish', 'pump', 'operational_status' doesn't use one of the documented values

The only correctly used tag here seems to be 'amenity'
Wava Stella (2022-09-17 15:20:26+00:00): Oh! I uploaded a different file. I will fix it and re-upload it. Thank you for the oversight.
Wava Stella (2022-09-17 15:22:50+00:00): I am working with two files of the dataset: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Uganda/Uganda_Water_Infrastructure_Mapping_Project
Glassman (2025-07-27 19:50:35+00:00): Do you know if this region is still under dispute between Chile and Argentina? DWG received a report that it has been resolved but with no documentation that it has.
John Adams of Chile (2025-07-27 20:56:43+00:00): Yes, I know. From Murallón to a point near Fitz Roy is disputed as its "pending"
Filip009 (2022-09-18 14:16:27+00:00): Why you have added layer tag to this stream? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570992296
abakus_uploader (2022-09-10 22:32:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-09-10 22:32:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mueschel (2022-09-10 11:20:56+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits. Many nodes have strange and misspelled tags like

Commercial = Warehouse
addr:constinuency = *
charles chilufya (2022-09-10 11:34:17+00:00): corrected
charles chilufya (2022-09-10 12:45:22+00:00): hi @Mueschel, thank you for reminder, i have made corrections now.
anakes (2022-09-13 19:50:39+00:00): Saludos. 
El mapa es reflejo de los elementos existentes o en construccion actual. Las ediciones realizadas son en propuesta y carece de planos y cartografia necesaria para referenciar en el mapa.

Proximamente se realizara la eliminacion de estas ediciones no verificadas
Samuel Chávez (2022-12-23 16:46:43+00:00): Hola Mike Ortega hace un tiempo te envié un correo sobre ediciones que hicistes a varias vias que rompieron relaciones de transporte público pero no recibí respuesta de parte tuya. Por favor evita alterar las vías y no revisar si alteras de manera negativa el correcto funcionamiento de los elementos del mapa. Ahora estoy corrigiendo muchos errores tuyos. Te pido por favor que no vuelvas a introducir errores a rutas tuc. Saludos.
Samuel Chávez (2022-12-23 16:49:44+00:00): Existen páginas web de OSM como esta:  https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-86.21921&lat=12.15174&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=1.00&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Samuel Chávez (2022-12-23 16:54:47+00:00): Las señales de alto y puertas se ubican en Las vías a como lo hicisteis en el km8 de carretera sur, es en la vía antes de la calle donde va a detenerse. Debes de leer mucho el wiki de OSM para saber que lo que mapeas es correcto.
mariotomo (2022-09-10 02:38:20+00:00): hi. are you sure about this action?
looks weird, deleting a major mountain range relation, moreover doing so in a changeset where you're also doing other quite unrelated edits.
guillemmal (2022-09-10 02:43:30+00:00): Hello!
I am from the Argentine community, the change was agreed upon with the Chilean community at the time and had already been eliminated. There were lines without content, what I did was delete that.
This are with other unrelated editions because I was just editing bus relations and got the error when loading in JOSM. The relationship was removed since Cordillera de los Andes is too complex and there is nothing specific defined regarding the mountain range.
mariotomo (2022-09-10 02:47:02+00:00): hi, sounds good, sorry to have bothered you. :+1:
guillemmal (2022-09-10 02:48:37+00:00): No problem! Have a nice day!