piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-10-24 10:34:55+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.
You did not square all buildings, mapped somehwat oversized and not accurate.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
user_2066394 (2020-09-14 15:57:57+00:00): Die Changesets heißen alle "Some details added", vielleicht noch kurze Erläuterung dazugeben.
BER319 (2020-09-14 12:47:19+00:00): Hallo Mehl42,
erst zeichnest du nicht existierende Wege ein und dann löschst du meine vor 2 Tagen erkundete und eingezeichnete Wege.
das finde ich nicht in Ordnung.
z.B 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846671715/history
Was ist hier kein Track
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24854004
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90853019
bei einer Breite von 2.5 Meter?
Wenn entlang eines 4 km Weges die smoothness unterschiedlich ist spalte ich den auf, warum verbindest du Ihn wieder.
Übrigens hast du immer noch nicht auf meine Fragen geantwortet.
VG
BER319
BER319 (2020-09-14 12:50:48+00:00): Ein abandoned:highway=track ist ein aufgegebener aber noch sichtbarer Weg, warum löschst auch du den?
Er dient dazu, das er nicht in der Karte angezeigt wird, aber nach Luftbildern evtl. nicht mehr euingezeichnet wird. Bitte stehen lassen.
BER319 (2020-09-14 12:52:33+00:00): Revertierst du die Löschungen oder soll ich den CS revertieren?
BER319 (2020-09-14 17:51:38+00:00): Hallo Mehl42, 
kannst du bitte erklären auf welcher Grundlage du diese beiden Wege https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847081990 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847081991 eingezeichnet hast? Meine Eintragung https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844754523 hast du gelöscht, wo wenigstens noch ein Ansatz eines ehemaligen Weges war. Doch bei deinen beiden Wegen ist wirklich nicht zu sehen. Ich war am Samstag vor Ort. Oder hast du diese vom Berlin Zoom Layer abgezeichnet?
Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du mal antworten würdest. 
VG
BER319
tux67 (2020-09-14 10:48:46+00:00): Hi,
like mentioned a couple time to your colleagues before - a schoolyard is definitievely no a public accessable  way. In this case I would even wonder if this is a highway=service (regardless of the access tag) at all.
BR
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90853313
sunkarab (2020-09-15 07:35:09+00:00): Thanks for checking into the edits. we stopped modifying the access tags to schools without evidence after the suggestions from the community members. please find the changesets for reference  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86666485 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86509334#map=18/42.76545/-71.18946
kindly let us know the corrective action, we will be happy to implement the changes that benefits the larger community. once again thanks for your suggestion
tux67 (2020-09-15 08:14:33+00:00): For all changes you make you should consider country specific rules and regulations. 
In germany a schoolyard is for sure (except there is a sign showing a different rule) not for public access. On top the service road you added is not leading to the parking lot at the south end of the school area, but to the middle of the schoolyard. I would suggest to let the highway=service to only lead to he parking area and make it motor_vehicle=destination
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90853313
sunkarab (2020-09-16 13:37:55+00:00): Thanks for the response. please find the changeset (90990579) for the suggested modifications. we have informed this to our team lead and make sure it is followed in all the editors working in Germany. kindly request you to provide us a week's time to get the changes implemented. thanks for your valuable feedback. always happy to learn from the community.
OneLoneRanger (2020-09-17 20:08:28+00:00): Please give your reasoning and source for this change. Has the area in question been completely fenced off?

The land in question where this path was is access land (right to roam) reference ID2289 [1]

Survey of this area was done on the 2020-03-01 using GPS with photos taken for reference [2] 

I believe this change the other other 2 within this area have been made by mistake, the area in question will be resurveyed and your changes reverted if found incorrect.

[1] https://map.cornwall.gov.uk/website/ccmap/?zoomlevel=8&xcoord=165577&ycoord=38052&wsName=ccmap&layerName=Access%20land%20(right%20to%20roam)


[2] https://ibb.co/0JHF9vn
OXO147 (2020-09-18 07:10:52+00:00): 
We are the landowners here, and apart from the error in your paths, there are other issues which are not safe to discuss online. I propose that if you are available to come and meet me here I will explain so we can resolve this to both our satisfactions. chris 07935193772
Rico557 (2020-09-14 09:08:25+00:00): что-то османд подглючивает, не переносятся все теги за раз
bxl-forever (2020-09-14 11:52:30+00:00): The new infrastructure is supposed to be temporary, right?  We had settled not to change anything here before getting the confirmation the new dual cycle track would stay.
Moreover, the situation on the eastbound sidewalk is very erratic: D9 were supposed to be removed, yet some parts do still have a sign while other parts haven’t.
VéloJesse (2020-09-14 18:12:58+00:00): Temporary in this case can be up to 2 years. I see your point but someone can always edit it into the original position when the ‘test phase’ is over. So to me it makes sense to update this street in OSM. AFAIK, it also illegal to bike on the north side of the street where the old bike path is, which is still indicated on OSM.
bxl-forever (2020-09-14 21:01:09+00:00): OK, let’s keep it for the moment.  After all, it will be easy to know when the situation changes.
I’ve done a few minor changes to your design.
Also, the north sidewalk still has D9 signs everywhere, I often use it.
eggie (2020-09-14 10:35:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Meestal wordt gebouwen en ligplaatsen geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG.
Nu heb je de ref:bag	870020000011872 gekopieerd van de ligplaats er naast. Dat is niet correct.

Een importverzoek doe je op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. dan komen de juiste gegevens mee.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Inlog identiek aan OSM account. 
Doe je het zelf?

Zolang er niets ligt kun je building=houseboat ook vervangen door mooring=private
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-14 10:37:18+00:00): De juiste gegevens kun je ook hier vinden https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Hoekeinde%2064&resultOffset=0&objectId=1959200000000318&geometry.x=125576.578&geometry.y=425830.093&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=1959020000000001
eheerema (2020-09-14 13:10:03+00:00): Ik heb net een BAG verzoek ingediend! Bedankt voor feedback!
eheerema (2020-09-17 14:36:17+00:00): Beste Eggie, ik zie op een bepaalde zoomlevel de BAG gegevens, op andere mijn (foutive) gegevens nog staan. En op andere levels helemaal niets.  Weet jij hoe dat werkt of wat ik nog moet/kan doen?
eggie (2020-09-17 14:51:27+00:00): Niets.. geduld.. Elk zoomniveau heeft z'n eigen renderingstijd nodig. Soms help ctrl F5 en F5 .. paar keer afwisselen. Je cache leegmaken. 
Het is inmiddels geïmporteerd.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-17 14:51:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847089160
eggie (2020-09-17 14:53:22+00:00): Bij mij doet de "t" het soms niet.. typo " ctrl-F5 -F5 helpt"
eheerema (2020-09-18 08:09:55+00:00): Ja top, bedankt!!!
eggie (2020-09-14 10:45:24+00:00): Dag Andre.. Door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus verschuif je ongemerkt andere node die je dan net hebt geselecteerd... zoals Oude Boekeloseweg 119  Die zit nu vastgeplakt aan de "buildingshape". 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90854958
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-14 11:49:18+00:00): nr 119 teruggeplaatst
eggie (2020-09-14 10:39:27+00:00): Top!
Dyoma (2020-09-14 10:56:45+00:00): Імена російською слід вносити під тегом name:ru а в name додавати українську версію.
cabinetcourbi (2020-09-22 05:03:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Voici un exemple de qualification d'usine https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850001489
Ars-UA (2020-09-14 10:03:03+00:00): Спросил в чате - кириллицей. Исправил.
marc__marc (2023-01-10 12:25:59+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141392068/history
la gare est une attraction touristique ? si oui qu'est-ce qu'on peux y faire ?
ou bien c'est le trajet en train sur le bout de ligne restauré qui constitue l'attraction ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-14 11:46:30+00:00): Vilniuje nėra adreso Algirdo g. 28. Taško adresas tai Naugarduko 15.
Miguel Pedr (2020-09-18 13:11:05+00:00): Hola,
parking_aisle se da a las áreas de estacionamiento donde estacionamos el vehículo y como podemos ver el uso del suelo, como la industria y también el nombre de la empresa fabricante de automóviles, no están destinados al estacionamiento exterior y el público no puede acceder a esas carreteras y la forma en que esos caminos no están diseñados para estacionar también. En tales escenarios, dar parking_aisle como etiqueta para esos será etiquetas inapropiadas.

Para más información
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90857229
BlueGrotto (2020-09-19 00:49:15+00:00): Hi Miguel. I think these roads fit the definition of parking_aisle on the wiki even though they are part of private industrial area. I agree that these roads should be modeled differently than a normal parking lot though. I think we should add access=private to all of the roads within the gated area.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate 

Hola Miguel. Creo que estas carreteras se ajustan a la definición de parking_aisle en la wiki a pesar de que son parte de un área industrial privada. Sin embargo, estoy de acuerdo en que estas carreteras deben modelarse de manera diferente a un estacionamiento normal. Creo que deberíamos agregar access=private a todas las carreteras dentro del área cerrada.
SekeRob (2021-05-14 14:40:01+00:00): High, there's this cable you seem to be knowledgeable about. A mapper connected it to a cycle track, so I disconnected and removed the none power node from the line after which the focus jump to a 80 degree turn in the line and noticed there's no tower tag. Is this line which leads into the sea underground? Please confirm. Since it's towerless at all turns I've attached layer= -1 i.e. moved it underground.
Let me know
skfd (2020-09-18 13:00:33+00:00): Please don't cut holes in a pond for a *floating* building. there is water below it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90859418
User6 - Lightcyphers (2020-09-20 18:32:24+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your feedback. The information provided above, will help us to avoid the same situations in the future.
Dino Michelini (2020-12-05 13:04:20+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che stai dando il name a vari percorsi CAI e del Parco Sibillini ma stai sbagliando in quando il name (nome) non è né G.A.S., G.A.B. o il numero CAI. Per name si intende il nome proprio con il quale è conosciuto la Highway ad es. SP xx, Sentiero dei Mietitori, Via pinco pallo, ecc. L'informazione inserita nel name è sbagliata pertanto ti chiedo di correggere le modifiche fatte ed attenerti a quanto riportato nella wiki per i percorsi CAI (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI) e in generale per la mappatura outdoor (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Hiking). PS. Ho letto che anche sorcrosc ti ha già informato della faccenda. Il problema che non visualizzi il ref (numero CAI) o osmc:symbol (route) è causato da Garmin che non legge ancora la relativa key ma lo puoi tranquillamente risolvere utilizzando su smartphone OsmAnd e configurando la mappa per visualizzare osmc:symbol mentre sul device GPS puoi caricare una rotta creata a partire da OSM e che ti guida lungo l’escursione.
dp7 (2020-12-05 14:41:33+00:00): Ciao Nessun problema, posso rimuovere l'indicazione abbreviata GAS del Grande Anello dei Sibillini, anche se onestamente faccio fatica a capirne la ragione. Questo percorso esiste da tantissimo tempo, è ben conosciuto e "pubblicizzato" dal Parco, e attraversa alcuni tratti di sentiero che probabilmente, senza di esso, sarebbero caduti in disuso... inoltre credo che questo nome gli sia stato dato ben prima di quello del sentiero dei mietitori, quindi perchè uno va bene e l'altro no ? Non lo dico per fare polemica, vorrei solo capire meglio. Anche il nome dei sentieri CAI (ne avevo inseriti una manciata ma poi mi sono fermato quando mi è stato fatto notare) perchè non andrebbe bene ? Se è il CAI a fare manutenzione e se quei sentieri non hanno nessun nome proprio, perchè è sbagliato mettere il nome con cui vengono individuati sulle carte e sulla cartellonistica ? Secondo me è molto più sbagliato quello che fanno alcuni, indicando nomi inventati sui percorsi che fanno in mountain bike e che non esistono da nessuna parte, trasformando la montagna in una sorta di luna-park da consumare a piacimento (scusa lo sfogo !).In ogni caso mi atterrò alle regole e a questo proposito ti chiedo se sai indicarmi un modo/strumento per rimuovere rapidamente tutti questi tag... visto che a inserirli ci ho messo parecchio tempo!! ;-)Relativamente alla visualizzazione del ref, il problema non ce l'ho con i garmin (che uso pochissimo), quanto su alcune mappe (principalmente quelle di Thunderforest) disponibili su APPS come Viewranger e Maps3D. Purtroppo su queste APP non è possibile caricare le OpenTopo Map (a mio avviso le migliori) e non ne conosco altre dove sia possibile farlo. OSMAnd non lo conosco, darò volentieri un'occhiata.Grazie mille per la collaborazione e per i suggerimenti. Un saluto
dp7 (2020-12-05 18:21:11+00:00): Ti ringrazio ancora per le utilissime informazioni. JOSM lo utilizzo poco perchè lo trovo piuttosto macchinoso, ma ne intuisco le potenzialità e se mi permette di fare velocemente l'aggiornamento dei tag errati vedrò di approfondire quanto prima !
Relativamente ai rifugi, i pochi che ho mappato li ho visitati personalmente di recente e li ho trovati accessibili, senza blocchi o indicazioni particolari (anche se, in alcuni casi, in condizioni sicuramente migliorabili). Ma a prescindere da questo, non dovrebbero comunque poter essere mappati ed eventualmente taggati come chiusi/non accessibili ?
Dino Michelini (2020-12-07 20:27:57+00:00): certo... era solo un "remember" molte persone non si ricordano di aggiornare i dati riguardo a chiusure/aperture, contatti ecc.
Leo Slager (2020-09-15 00:01:29+00:00): Bij het station van Castricum heb je de busbaan veranderd in een bushalte.
Met als gevolg dat alle routerelaties daar beschadigd zijn.
Als je het verschil tussen een busbaan en een bushalte niet weet, moet je er gewoon van af blijven en geen wijzigingen doorvoeren !
aharvey (2020-09-14 10:54:44+00:00): justification here is that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:board:title is documented and in-use and probably better than "name" when applied to information boards.

Similar to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign#As_part_of_a_way adding signpost node to the way to make it clear it applies to the way and add a direction tag.
LorenzoPesci (2020-09-15 07:29:57+00:00): La sigla G.A.S. non va bene.
Se un nome può essere pronunciato per esteso, non abbreviarlo. dice la wiki
Credo dunque sia corretto riportare "Grande anello dei monti Sibillini"
dp7 (2020-09-15 08:14:38+00:00): Ciao Lorenzo
Ho utilizzato la sigla G.A.S. in quanto universalmente riconosciuta in ambito escursionistico, sia in italia che all'estero (nonostante in inglese la sigla derivante dalla traduzione sarebbe diversa). Inoltre la dicitura per esteso sarebbe molto lunga e "occuperebbe" spazio sulla mappa.
Se ritieni comunque che sia necessario correggerla a prescindere, mi adeguo e provvedo.
sorcrosc (2020-09-17 20:39:57+00:00): A parte le abbreviazioni, questi non sono nomi da mettere sui singoli pezzi di sentiero. Il G.A.S. è un itinerario e le varie tappe sono già mappate come relazioni. Questa per esempio è una:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9316032
dp7 (2020-09-18 08:29:11+00:00): Il problema, o meglio il limite delle relazioni è che non sono visibili sulla mappa e questo rappresenta un limite sulle applicazioni per l'escursionismo. Le uniche mappe in cui sono visibili (o almeno le uniche che ho trovato io) sono le Thunderforest Outdoors, in cui però i tracciati con molteplici relazioni (cioè comuni a vari percorsi) vengono sovrapposti e rendono il risultato piuttosto confusionario (tra l'altro queste mappe non sono il massimo perchè non visualizzano molte informazioni importanti, presenti invece su OSM).
Nel caso del G.A.S., questo è un tracciato "storico", molto conosciuto anche all'estero e che attira molti turisti in una zona che, come sapete, ne ha davvero tanto bisogno. Per questo motivo ho ritenuto utile indicare il nome in chiaro sui vari segmenti di sentiero, abbreviandolo per non "imbrattare" la mappa, ma fornendo comunque indicazioni più immediate a chi intendesse valutare questo bellissimo percorso.
In ogni caso sono nuovo e non voglio contravvenire alle regole: fatemi sapere cosa bisogna fare e mi adeguo.
Grazie !
muramototomoya (2020-10-31 08:15:09+00:00): You added many 'tourism=viewpoint' in Hachimangu. However 'tourism=viewpoint' is not a tag indicating a suitable place to visit, but a tag indicating a scenic spot to see your surroundings from a height. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint
Please review the tags.
muramototomoya (2020-10-31 08:17:30+00:00): Thank you  for your edit.
AntMadeira (2020-09-14 20:37:47+00:00): Olá, Ricardo.
Bem-vindo ao mundo do OpenStreetMap!

É sempre bom ver mais mapeadores, em especial na zona centro, onde eles são tão poucos. Vi que fizeste algumas edições no bairro de Santa Clara e que usaste as imagens de satélite da Bing. Para a próxima, aconselho-te a usares as imagens da ESRI, que são as mais recentes e as mais bem alinhadas.
Qualquer dúvida, não hesites em contactar-me. Tens também o canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa, onde poderás colocar dúvidas, sugestões e críticas.
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos e bons mapeamentos,
António Madeira.
Chris Fleming (2020-09-14 22:58:05+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM! I've had a quick look and these edits look good to me.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris
user_2066394 (2020-09-14 11:46:35+00:00): Aktuell nicht einem Gebäude zugeordnet, ist das ein Biergarten/Außenbereich?
naveenpf (2020-09-16 01:30:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90862467
*abq* (2022-10-31 07:19:48+00:00): Hallo,
du hast im Bereich Kandel die Quellfassungen alle mit man_made=water_works erfasst. Richtig wäre (ist auch so im Wiki erfasst) man_made=spring_box und die Verwendung von water_works nur für das eigentliche Wasserwerk. 
VG Reiner
parukhin (2020-09-25 14:09:37+00:00): Hi! Why do you delete tags from restaurant and only move amenity=restaurant to new relarion?
User6 - Lightcyphers (2020-10-01 19:21:31+00:00): Hi parukhin,
It was created a multi-polygon, therefore the tags were changed. Also, the restaurant was connected to another multi-polygon which is water. 
Should you have more questions, please contact us.
parukhin (2020-10-02 06:24:17+00:00): Yes, but when created multipolygon was deleted many tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295857500/history
kuhni74 (2023-04-28 22:44:38+00:00): bitte um Beteiligung an der Disk. auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3255407
naveenpf (2020-09-16 00:48:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90863530
SekeRob (2020-09-18 13:17:52+00:00): Kindly redraw your ferry route to land in Pescara harbor and not miles south. Also the land route is completely cross country rather than actual route. Rather than actually drawing the land route, you can add route coding to the the streets and motorway, less confusing other editors.

Thanks
highflyer74 (2020-09-24 12:01:34+00:00): Moin und danke für diese Änderung. Denke daran, wenn Du Telefonnummern einträgst, dass es im Format +49 xxx xxxxxxxxx geschieht (also mit Leerzeichen zwischen Land / Stadt / Rufnummer). Viele Grüße!
MikeN (2020-09-14 12:18:47+00:00): Again, please do not delete the lake waterbody to create a golf course
Nakaner (2020-09-16 08:25:55+00:00): Hallo,

ist das weiterhin ein japanisches Restaurant? Vorher hieß es "Sushi Kaiser", jetzt "The Noodlemaker". Oder welche Küchenrichtung hat es jetzt? Italienisch, deutsch, französisch, chinesisch, …?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Sebbop (2020-09-16 09:26:23+00:00): Hi,
es handelt sich dabei um ein Chinesisches Nudelrestaurant.
Gruß Sebastian
daniel_solow (2020-09-15 20:14:26+00:00): Hi Nitram,

I noticed that you have been active adding buildings in Rockville Centre, NY. Just curious are you a Long Island mapper? Earlier this summer I set up a task manager to track the mapping in the Town of Hempstead. Please check it out and consider mapping some of the tasks so we can get to 100%. Please also consider joining the Slack channel #local-newyorkstate https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/200?task=918
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90865090
nitram1234 (2020-09-16 12:35:42+00:00): Hi Daniel, yeah, I saw your initiative on Twitter and read a part of your blog. Impressive organization! I used to live in RVC but now am living overseas and just wanted to touch up RVC a bit. If I have a bit more time in the future, I will come back and consider joining the tracking you’ve set up. 

Keep up the excellent work, mate! 
Cheers,
Martin
dadavid (2026-05-04 09:42:16+00:00): Hi, 

du hattest hier die barrier=height_restrictor an die Durchfahrtstraße (Haldenäckerweg) gemappt. Ich meine mich zu erinnern, dass die aber nur an den Parkplatzstraßen sind. Sonst würden Lieferfahrzeuge etc ja gar nicht zum Sportheim kommen. 
Ich habe sie jetzt mal da hin verschoben, ich hoffe das passt :) 

Viele Grüße

David
SomeoneElse (2020-09-14 13:32:58+00:00): Thanks!
This should resolve the issue raised with the DWG that was mentioned at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ie/2020-September/thread.html#2651 .
Mariusz189 (2022-12-16 12:06:50+00:00): Czy posiadasz jakieś szersze info o tym miejscu ? link ?
alisek (2022-12-16 12:50:43+00:00): raczej nie
eggie (2020-09-14 13:10:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Een leisure=park name= het Koningsplein op een node hoort eigenlijk niet. 
leisure=park is een transparant die over de andere landuse heen hoort te liggen als vlak. 


MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2024-01-20 14:03:40+00:00): See forum thread https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/someones-added-building-plots-as-buildings/101306
eggie (2020-09-14 13:14:41+00:00): Schuiven met de kaart in edit modus  levert vaak schade op. Je kunt dan onbedoeld aresnodes of andere objecten verplaatsen. Hier dus ook.
Maastrichter Heidenstraat 4B ligt nu ergens anders.
Ook graag bedrijven direct op de adresnodes bijtaggen. Niet zelf adressen aanmaken in OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-14 13:15:53+00:00): 4B hersteld
eggie (2020-09-14 13:18:44+00:00): park op node verwijderd
eggie (2020-09-14 13:20:16+00:00): boschstr 7 teruggeplaatst