piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
borazslo (2021-02-13 10:29:36+00:00): ú, basszus. bocs a világtól. és köszi, hogy azóltál. javítva.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-15 18:06:05+00:00): not a dual carriage way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906682487/history
SomeoneElse (2021-02-14 11:46:46+00:00): Hello MTB FORIS,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
You've changed lots of names here to the same name "MTB CITY ROAD".  This makes no sense - if a road or track has its own name, then use that name.  If it is part of a route, please give that name to a route.
We'll have to undo these changes.  If you've got any questions please email data@openstreetmap.org .
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-02-14 12:06:10+00:00): Pozdrav MTB FORIS,
Andy iz OSM-ove Radne skupine za podatke ovdje.
Ovdje ste promijenili puno imena u isto ime "MTB CITY ROAD". To nema smisla - ako cesta ili staza imaju svoje ime, tada to ime upotrijebite. Ako je dio rute, navedite to ime ruti.
Morat ćemo poništiti ove promjene. Ako imate pitanja, pošaljite e-poštu na data@openstreetmap.org.
Lijepi Pozdrav,
Andy
MTB FORIS (2021-02-14 13:10:53+00:00): Dear,
All trails designated as "MTB CITY ROAD" are located within the "MTB CITY ROAD" bicycle park, which is officially approved by the city of East Sarajevo. All trails are physically arranged by our club and marked with bicycle signs. So they have to bear this name. Over time, the park will expand and we will create new trails that we will add to the Openstreatmap database. Please see the links:
http://mtb.4is.info/projekat-mtb-city-road/
http://mtb.4is.info/map/web-aplikacija-mtb-city-road-2/
MTB FORIS (2021-02-14 13:14:48+00:00): Dear,
this terrain, as it is marked, is the Cycling Park "MTB CITY ROAD". The trails will get other names over time, but we are the only ones relevant because we built, arranged and marked them with bike signs. We have permits for the same from the competent institutions.
He can deliver them to you on request. I hope you will appreciate our remark. Because otherwise we will complain to a higher level, that is, to the competent institutions.
With respect,
SomeoneElse (2021-02-14 14:39:46+00:00): >  So they have to bear this name.

To be clear - that isn't how names are used within OpenStreetMap.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for details.  You may of course wish to set the "operator" of these trails to the organisation that operates them.
Best Regards,
Andy
eggie (2022-11-03 14:19:14+00:00): changed church into cemetery
gscholz (2021-02-18 08:08:15+00:00): Hi andrea20vicky,
the footways you have added here are wildly crossing several other ways without being connected to them:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-80.88696&lat=8.08891&zoom=16&overlays=snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99197060

Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2021-03-08 05:55:40+00:00): Hi andrea20vicky,
this error still exits, when are you going to fix it?
Guido
gscholz (2021-03-20 06:47:25+00:00): Hi andrea20vicky, 
this error still exits, can I get a response here?
Guido
mariotomo (2021-07-20 11:27:00+00:00): hi Guido, thank you for helping make a better map. andrea20vicky ist ein Prakticant, directed by Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez, contributing to his Santiago-Atalaya project. please check his initial invitation and my feedback-offer to help on the Panama forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69187
tekim (2021-05-16 16:06:15+00:00): Thanks for your interest in OSM.

In OSM we map what is on the ground, not just what is official.
tekim (2021-05-16 16:19:24+00:00): After consulting with the community I left the location of the old trail with a note, and the appropriate tagging:
abandoned:highway=path so that those using outdated satellite/aerial imagery would not move the representation of the trail in OSM back to its old location.
user_5359 (2021-02-13 05:39:07+00:00): Hello! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
Wim L (2021-02-14 19:52:51+00:00): Ah, thanks! The street name isn't always apparent from the physical signage on the building but I've added it.
syntex (2021-07-26 14:34:22+00:00): Ta droga nie ma żadnej nazwy
Glassman (2021-02-12 23:11:30+00:00): Deane - From the changeset details it looks like you are using the city of bellingham's buildings. They look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99198255
mariotomo (2021-02-13 14:29:18+00:00): hola.  no sé si vives en la zona, no será que sigues copiando de Google/Waze/Here maps?
mariotomo (2021-02-13 14:40:10+00:00): I reverted this changeset, please make sure you specify your sources and that they are compatible with the OSM data license.
BigKev97 (2023-04-24 13:35:58+00:00): Dejé de usarlo.
dcapillae (2021-02-12 22:40:34+00:00): No es una importación. Las etiquetas del conjunto de cambios se han arrastrado por error desde un conjunto de cambios anterior (error mío).
Emilius123 (2022-11-14 15:42:56+00:00): Bro, you live around here?
MoiraPrime (2022-11-14 15:45:07+00:00): Used to. How did you know? 😉
Emilius123 (2022-11-14 17:39:14+00:00): Was playing around with MS Building footprints in the area and found your changesets here
eggie (2021-02-13 07:11:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback: access=no is bijna altijd verkeerd.
Overdag opnegesteld gaat met consitional tragging
Bv foot:conditional=yes @ (sunrise-sunset) 
Alle met wielen verboden is vehicle=no bij highway=path
bicycle=no hoeft niet bij highway=footway

Staat er een G7 bord dan highway=footway gebruiken
Geen bord dan highway=path


MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Hans Thompson (2021-02-12 23:24:33+00:00): These are verified roads and trails. If they are private then they should remain and be tagged as private property. It is also visible by aerial imagery. They should not have been removed.

Please refer to the article on the osm wiki here on what is acceptable to map:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability.
Hans Thompson (2021-02-13 01:10:23+00:00): This street is already mapped by the municipality here: https://muniorg.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=493d6c82574c43d981bd2aaa384b3d60
user_5359 (2021-02-13 05:01:23+00:00): Hello! Please see https://www.osm.org/changeset/99137738
Bert Araali (2021-02-25 23:39:42+00:00): Hello, thanks for improving Uganda's map. Maybe next time consider using Maxar Imagery, it is much more recent (up to 1 year) where Bing imagery is up to 10 years old. Don't forget to align your imagery before starting to map. Enjoy !
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 10:37:48+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Looks good, thanks for adding names (in this changeset and others).
Most of the roads had a fixme set, of "name?", I've removed this for all roads which now have a name.
Also, in some of the roads you marked as open (I think in another changeset) they still had their construction value set.
i.e. they were
highway=construction, construction=residential
and you had only changed highway to residential. So I removed the construction tag as that is now not needed.
One other thing, there are a few roads which have multiple parts and you've added the name to the main part of the road, but if it applies then could you also add it to the subparts. At least including Eider Avenue, Chaffinch Close, Jay Court, Daffodil Drive, Hillman Drive, Poplar Road, the first bit of Oak Way
Is the end of Woodlark Way open now?
That ended up being a long comment, but thanks again for the changes.
Gareth Thomas (2021-02-13 12:31:14+00:00): Hello, yes sorry if I made some mistakes , still a novice! Yes the roads are open ( I live on the estate and part of the residents group) 

I will add the road name to the multiple parts :)

Yes the end of Woodlark is now open . The only road that’s currently blocked is Thompson way at the north of the site as the builders have a site compound there blocking the road whilst they finish the last of the houses which is approx 7-10

Thanks for helping I do really appreciate it 

Gareth
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 19:34:40+00:00): Great, it would probably be good to update the outline of the construction area then, and replace suitable parts with residential areas.
Then adding addresses to all of the houses would be great (but require a bit of effort I know).
Gareth Thomas (2021-02-15 11:24:51+00:00): Yes I can add addresses as I now have a list (I am part of the residents assoc and want to create a map for our estate) . How would I go about adding addresses? Never done this?
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 11:41:29+00:00): Simply select the house and then add details in the address field.
The key things are house number (the 123 box), and/or name if applicable, the street name and the post code if possible.
The city is optional because that can be implied from other boundary data in OSM.
Gareth Thomas (2021-02-15 11:44:31+00:00): ok great , Yesi have all these collected in a spreadsheet so I can add these for our estate. Thank you!
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-15 12:02:14+00:00): Great stuff!
eggie (2021-02-13 07:16:39+00:00): Begin nooit met access=no.. Ook de rendering zal minder worden.
Is het een highway=path og een footway met het bekenden blauwe ronde bord G7?
access=no Betekent Hier is de toegang verboden.. Welk bord staat er vooraan? Verboden Toegang art. 461? 
Maar dan kan het nooit een footway zijn. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-02-13 07:26:33+00:00): Aangepast aan je omschrijving.. access=no verwijderd.
foot:conditional=yes @ (sunrise-sunset)
vehicle=np

footway omgezet in path (oorspronkelijke tagging)
Staat hier tegenwoordig dan een G7bord.. dan weer veranderen in footway, maar daar routeert al niets over met wielen?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-13 07:38:00+00:00): Tagging aangepast aan omschrijving.. Weet eigenlijk wel zeker dat het hier een highway=path betreft.
Het zal niet voor iets met wielen routeren alleen bij daglicht voor voetgangers.
MVG
eggie
wireguy (2021-02-13 12:31:44+00:00): I think these are pickleball courts.  The net would be too low for badmitton
user_8101879 (2021-12-22 13:39:41+00:00): Hi,

are you sure of the borders of the parafia (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8052409) ?
All the routes go outside these borders and it looks strange to me that the routes of the parafia go out of the parafia.
WieKo68 (2021-12-22 20:14:07+00:00): Hi
The Stations of the Cross and the Stations of the Passion were created before the parish on St. Anne's Mountain was established in 1938, therefore they go beyond the boundaries of the present parish
user_5359 (2021-02-13 05:33:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

I assume it could be the key entrance
JJIglesias (2021-02-13 01:48:28+00:00): Thanks for the Massive correction @ Bolivia.
My Best Regards
user: JJIglesias
su ch (2021-02-13 01:03:13+00:00): comment got cut off: Unsure how to tag, amended from leisure=nature_reserve. Would be open to deleting it entirely.
user_5359 (2021-02-13 05:31:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Did you see the tag checked_exists:date=2016-08-27? If you know that the shop exists at the time of editing, you can adjust the timestamp to the current date accordingly.
pencilears (2021-02-13 22:58:54+00:00): ahh cool, yeah it's open and operational
Glassman (2021-02-13 22:29:54+00:00): When showing a footway through a building, I'd tag it as a passageway. Right now OSM doesn't have a good plan for indoor mapping. People are working on indoor mapping but I think having the tools to do the job are a ways off.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99200549
Glassman (2021-02-13 22:25:51+00:00): Probably the correct tag to allowing horses on the cycleway is horses=yes. Same with foot that another user tagged as foot=designated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99200669
Glassman (2021-02-13 20:28:52+00:00): #TIP:There is a tag for the end of a road, noexit=yes. Then just draw the parking lot area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99200781
haavee (2021-02-17 21:33:06+00:00): Bitte siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=818997#p818997
Kann 'tmp=Verschieben rückgängig machen' entfernt werden?
JochenB (2021-02-17 22:05:07+00:00): Habs entfernt. Hatte damit markiert, welche Objekte die Nutzerin im strittigen Änderungssatz angefasst hatte und wollte das eigentlich vorm Hochladen wieder rausnehmen. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99479345)
Glassman (2021-02-13 20:25:36+00:00): #TIP: 
Instead of a description I'd suggest using a tag, such as foot=no. Routers understand tags but don't parse descriptions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99200990
MxxCon (2021-02-13 05:28:18+00:00): Hello.
Never knew this area was an officially designated park with a separate name.🙂
One issue with your edit is that a correct key name for web addresses is `website`, not `url`.
Also, you deleted a clearly visible and identifiable sports field. It should probably still be mapped..👍
Greg_Rose (2021-09-24 20:52:49+00:00): Hi there - just so you know, make sure you convert elevation data into meters!
Glassman (2021-02-13 20:22:04+00:00): #TIP: Use don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tags should be sufficient. If there is a formal name for the path then it should be use.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99201414
JayTurnr (2021-02-13 10:06:24+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap. It looks like you've added the restaurant twice. I'm sure this was by accident. Is the node (single point) where the entrance is?
DressyPear4 (2021-02-15 23:30:03+00:00): Olá, que critério você está usando para elevar essas vias para terciárias?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99202839
alan_grunitzki (2021-02-17 02:54:24+00:00): Olá, essas vias cortam bairros, sendo bastante movimentadas. Logo, não são ruas como quaisquer outras do bairro. Atualizando-as ,passamos a informação que são as ruas com melhor estrutura e saída.
Grato.
JayTurnr (2021-02-13 18:18:11+00:00): Why have you changed the name of this bus stop?
Tarana Turners Hill (2021-02-14 00:12:09+00:00): Hi Jay, hope you are well!  Since 2015 Bust stop name changed to the name I have changed. I only corrected the name. 

Best Regards
Jahan
Tarana Turners Hill (2021-02-14 00:13:06+00:00): if you let me have your email I can email you the photo of the bus stop
JayTurnr (2021-02-14 00:49:38+00:00): Hi, i've updated the bus stop data from the latest official source now :)
Tarana Turners Hill (2021-02-14 01:12:00+00:00): great, thank you
mueschel (2021-02-19 10:31:30+00:00): Hi,
what's the meaning of this key? I can't find a documentation:
china class = cun

Thanks!
Alacros (2021-03-27 08:20:08+00:00): I'm sorry there was a mistake that I typed "china_class" as "china class".
I've corrected it.
Glassman (2021-02-13 06:36:41+00:00): Are you sure about the data you added? For example, a private home now has three heliports and one aerodrome. See Ware Mountain Heliport just southeast of Mount Vernon. The owner has made the news for his one helicopter.
user_5359 (2021-02-14 05:36:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96729608! "condition of building" is the wrong key. Your letter code isn't defined. Please read the documentation. 

And please inform your tutor!
MxxCon (2021-02-14 02:44:34+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you make these changes?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99203062
clay_c (2021-09-16 18:06:23+00:00): changeset reverted here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111303741
mavl (2021-05-22 10:56:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
VJean (2021-04-06 09:19:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr:suburb
PT-53 (2021-02-13 08:19:19+00:00): Hallo WolfFisch,
was ist die Quelle für dieses neue Gebäude:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906731118 ?
Auf den Bing-Luftbildern kann ich dort (noch ?) kein Gebäude erkennen.
Fragende Grüße
WolfFisch (2021-03-11 09:54:58+00:00): Gebäude befindet sich zur Zeit im Bau. Evtl. Sind die Außenmaße noch nicht exakt.
PT-53 (2021-03-11 11:01:33+00:00): Hallo WolfFisch, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Quelle für das neue Gebäude wäre also Erkundung vor Ort.

Da das Gebäude noch im Bau ist,
wäre die Merkmal-Kombination 
building=construction
construction=appertment
evtl. vorerst passender und würde auch das Fehlen auf dem Luftbild erklären.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction

Grüße
user_5359 (2021-02-14 05:19:51+00:00): Hello! Please explain the combination of landuse=commerical and "condition of building". Is this a building or not?
user_5359 (2021-02-14 05:31:15+00:00): Please have also a look on the comment of https://www.osm.org/changeset/98050784. Your buildings are to big and wrong placed. I change the building https://www.osm.org/way/906731914 and https://www.osm.org/way/906731915
PT-53 (2021-02-13 08:15:43+00:00): Hallo WolfFisch,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz in Hohentengen-Bremen bei verschiedenen Gebäuden den Umriß verändert / vergrößert. Die Gebäude waren zuvor aber anhand Maps4BW korrekt eingzeichnet gewesen. Deine Veränderungen stellten daher - sicher unabsichtlich - eine Verschlimmbesserung dar. Ich habe diese daher wieder vollständig zurückgesetzt.
Blende Dir mal im ID Maps4BW als Hintergrund ein und schaue es Dir nochmal an.
Wiki Maps4BW:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW
Grüße
WolfFisch (2021-03-03 11:33:17+00:00): Die Satellitenaufnahme zeigt andere Umrisse und die MapsBW4-Karten sind nicht vollständig. Ich komme von Hohentengen und weiß was hier vor Ort vorhanden ist.
PT-53 (2021-03-03 14:56:37+00:00): Hallo WolfFisch, 
danke für Deine Rückmeldung.

Daß die Satelitenaufnahme andere, größere Umriße als Maps4BW anzeigen, liegt daran, daß - bei den meisten Gebäuden - ein Dachüberhang vorhanden ist.
Sofern möglich soll aber in OSM nicht der Dachumriß sondern der EG-Gebäudeumriß eingezeichnet werden.
Auszug aus dem Wiki:
>>> Wenn möglich sollte der gezeichnete Umriss der Außenwand am Boden folgen (Grundriss), also z.B. Dachüberstände aussparen. <<<
 Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Geb%C3%A4ude

Maps4BW ist leider nicht besonders aktuell. Neubauten der lezten 2 Jahre (?) und An- bzw. Umbauten fehlen leider noch. 
Die Bing-Luftbilder für Bremen stammen aus dem Herbst 2019. Da kann es schon vorkommen, daß auf den Luftbildern ein Gebäude zu sehen ist, daß in Maps4BW noch fehlt.

Grüße
JayTurnr (2021-02-13 18:26:24+00:00): Hiya! We don't map address plots but rather what's on the ground. So adding the building is fine but the plot of land is out of scope of the project. Welcome to OpenStreetMap
Tarana Turners Hill (2021-02-14 00:06:15+00:00): Thank you
ALu68 (2021-02-13 12:44:35+00:00): anuj96, stop!
Why do you overlap several buildings?
If you like to map complex buildings, read the wiki first!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
ALu68 (2021-02-14 10:53:39+00:00): Overlapping buildings removed - Quality not improved! 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99244646
anuj96 (2021-02-14 17:04:22+00:00): hey sorry i was not aware of it been also verify. it is incomplete process just for speed up i m first overlap most building and 2nd step join the overlapping and improving details .3rd step if possible i will add content regard height in that area i just uploading those for my friends to help me out or community people  i work on large area trying to speed up ofcoruse i will finish them with details
anuj96 (2021-02-14 20:57:26+00:00): please do not take action without understanding i using some of shortcut method which do not make senses if its incomplete and process is incomplete you wasting both our time!! bring these building back if possible thxx
Muokkaaja (2021-03-26 11:29:40+00:00): Poistan Vuoksenniskan suuralueen, sillä se on merkattu väärin. Käytä suuralueiden merkitsemiseen boundary=administrative.
tguen (2021-09-10 00:51:14+00:00): You're probably aware of this by now, but the name tag shouldn't be used to describe things. I've seen several schools in this area where name=* inappropriately duplicates sport=* or should be changed to description=*.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
archpdx (2021-09-10 01:51:24+00:00): You're correct, I've since realized that I shouldn't add names for these pitches. I've recently removed names from Aloha HS and I'll probably remove names from other schools around this area sometime this week or next week.
4004 (2021-02-15 01:02:59+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правки.
можете попробовать написать в исполком, с просьбой раскрыть планы, но шансы невелики
VitalieS (2021-02-15 10:53:59+00:00): Hello.
You just added the same location twice (once 5 days ago and this one 2 days ago).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99204507
ZldYe (2021-02-14 10:48:08+00:00): Bedankt!
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:21:11+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_2066394 (2021-05-15 14:59:57+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/906742151
abakus_uploader (2021-02-13 23:31:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
XimeX (2021-02-13 11:27:32+00:00): Hallo Reiner,
gibt es einen Grund warum du amenity=fire_station gelöscht hast?
Hab das für ganz Bezirk Baden so eingetragen.
LG Thomas