piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ameziol (2022-09-14 08:29:15+00:00): jak uważacie że lepiej dać highway=construction, dodać obszar itp, to się nie wstydźcie zmienić, ta edycja jest na szybko zrobiona byle nawigacja wiedziała żeby omijać
Olga | Yanosik (2022-09-14 08:35:34+00:00): Na pewno trzeba dać na segmencie informację o remoncie i planowanej dacie zakończenia. W opisie changesetu mało kto to widzi. Dopisuję. Pozdr. Olga
ameziol (2022-09-14 08:37:56+00:00): jasne, zapamiętam na przyszłość, dzięki!
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-09-14 08:23:08+00:00): What was done here?
Please use good changeset comments, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
Allroads (2022-09-14 08:30:42+00:00): Wil je alle placement=transition terug zetten op de wegen.
Detail is nu verwijderd.
Op de in en uitvoegen van de snelwegen.
Dit heb ik met zorg ingetekend.
chinsbergen (2022-09-14 10:18:09+00:00): OK, ik heb het teruggezet
bxl-forever (2022-09-14 23:32:44+00:00): Hello,

I am afraid your data source is incorrect.

This street is located in Brussels, the capital of Belgium.

We are a bilingual city and all street names here are written in the two official languages, French and Dutch.

The name which you forced, "Van Souststraat", is only the Dutch version.  This is not correct.

I see that another user promptly undid your changeset to restore the proper name.

Don’t worry about street names in our area, everything is already properly set and actively monitored.
NikitaSalt (2022-10-20 10:38:30+00:00): Hello! thank you for your comment. Unfortunately "shamraevahelen" is unavailable now and cannot answer. We will definitely take your comment to attention.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126168123
Allroads (2022-09-14 09:04:28+00:00): Zie nu ook hier en andere changeset verwijdering van detail. placement=transition
chinsbergen (2022-09-14 10:19:28+00:00): Heb hem hier ook teruggezet
SHARCRASH (2022-09-14 13:23:11+00:00): Hi! Can you please be more specific for your changeset description, please. Location + updates is very general as we can see anyway the location of the edits and obviously any data changes in changesets are either corrections or updates. Thanks for you comprehension! 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#:~:text=A%20good%20changeset%20comment%20should,edited%20and%20the%20sources%20used.
adiatmad (2022-09-16 07:11:09+00:00): Hello, hope you are doing well.
I came across this highway and somehow can not find it from several imageries in JOSM
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1094437945). Do you mind checking it?
mjgk (2022-09-16 10:41:01+00:00): In reviewing your observation I note that this task has yet to be validated by HOT.
RicoElectrico (2022-09-14 22:15:33+00:00): Hej, do domów powinien być dojazd drogami innymi niż highway=track.
julcnx (2022-09-14 11:43:15+00:00): Hi. If you are 100% sure both ways are not connected, please use a noexit=yes tag for the last nodes, otherwise, someone else may reconnect them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126169303
julcnx (2022-09-14 11:43:57+00:00): Hi. If you are 100% sure both ways are not connected, please use a noexit=yes tag for the last nodes, otherwise, someone else may reconnect them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126169303
GrabTH_Napittha (2022-09-16 03:21:43+00:00): Thank you for your suggestion
ualios (2022-11-20 10:24:43+00:00): Hi SekeRob, maybe you meant "Tommaso"?
SekeRob (2022-11-20 10:53:26+00:00): Absolutely, he walked around this region quite a lot :O))))

thx and fixed in a jiffy.
SHARCRASH (2022-09-14 11:15:07+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! I've checked your changeset. Before continuing as contributor, you need to realize that each tag and its geometrical element represents something specific and that the map/data can be seen as a 3D space, meaning various 1D or 2D elements overlapping others. So please, read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide or read the Basics and Fundamenals in my profile.

Here, the buildings you wanted to specify as apartments should be tagged as building=apartments and the landuse, being rather the land under the buildings, as OSM's Wiki page for the key "landuse" states in its definition, therefore it should be a separate element tagged with landuse=residential. Which is already the case with this MultiPolygon (MP) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12650559
SHARCRASH (2022-09-14 11:26:01+00:00): By the way, sometimes aerial photos can mislead contributors. For these buildings:
- this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163755944 it doesn't have the right shape, there are actually 2 clearly separate buildings.
- and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163755766 same, there are several separate buildings, some might be underground. If they were side by side and generally described with building=yes, it is accepted to represent them on the map in this manner. Otherwisethey should be seeprated with precise position. You can help yourself with the great source layer 'Openstreetmap.lu Mapper's Delight LIDAR". It doesn't need to be corrected in its spacial position (no offset), it is by default accurate and doesn't have tilting (for buildings). All others from Geoportail.lu and are fine also (apart the very high buildings), but be careful then with others like Bing etc, they have a tilting and need offset correction.
Dodko (2022-09-15 09:51:40+00:00): tá značka je pre veľký kríž na kopci
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:man_made%3Dcross
skúr st emali použiť značku
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross
a taký názov Drevený kríž sa nedáva keď tak značku
material=wood
eggie (2022-09-14 09:57:50+00:00): Dag Willem..

In het begin kijken we wel mee.. uiteraard om te helpen.
Wellicht highway=service
met service=driveway?
access=customers  .. Wie zijn die klanten hier?
Wellicht beter verwijderen?
Zou het access=permissive kunnen zijn? Eigen terrein?
De verkeersdeelnemers kun je beter verwijderen. Die zijn default. 

Je edits..  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126170469

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-14 10:01:21+00:00): De straatnaam zal niet Mariënhoven 92-98

Alleen officiële straatnamen gebruiken svp Dus geen adressen in straatnamen vermoed ik.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-14 20:04:58+00:00): De tagging heb ik aangepast.
Je 'moet' maar eens kijken. 
MVG
eggie
Dodko (2022-09-15 09:53:40+00:00): Do direction sa dáva rozsah vyhliadky, odkiaľ pokiaľ vidno. Jedno číslo/uhol sa dáva napríklad na vstup do jaskyne.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint
adiatmad (2022-09-15 05:51:24+00:00): Hello SREEPRIYA SIVANANDAN. Hope you are doing well.
This edit looks great (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10023921521). Maybe it would be better to add the hospital name if you have a chance (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). 
Happy mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126170781
streinger (2022-09-14 09:20:55+00:00): https://gkrfkod.ru/zakonodatelstvo/rasporjazhenie-rosavtodora-ot-31012022-n-70-r/
Frans S (2022-09-15 14:33:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126170845
streinger (2022-09-14 09:26:15+00:00): https://gkrfkod.ru/zakonodatelstvo/rasporjazhenie-rosavtodora-ot-31012022-n-70-r/
streinger (2022-09-14 09:31:27+00:00): https://gkrfkod.ru/zakonodatelstvo/rasporjazhenie-rosavtodora-ot-31012022-n-70-r/
eggie (2022-09-14 10:04:13+00:00): Beste Koen,

Wanneer een bedrijf verdwijnt dan graaf het adres intact laten. 
Ik zal het herstellen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-14 10:06:05+00:00): graaf?? > typo graag..  Ik heb het adres weer teruggezet.
Groet
eggie
silversurfer83 (2022-09-27 09:57:29+00:00): Moin,

interessante Überarbeitung. Warum hast du die Wege alle gelöscht?

Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126171913
Cr-ash (2022-09-27 10:29:00+00:00): Die Wege sind nicht mehr existent und wurden zum Großteil rekultiviert.
silversurfer83 (2022-09-27 14:22:59+00:00): Ah
Ok. Dann dürfte löschen in Ordnung sein. Eine bessere Beschreibung deiner Änderung fände ich grundsätzlich ganz hilfreich. So könntest du bei "Quellen" angeben wo du deine Informationen zu der Änderung bezogen hast und der Kommentar darf gerne etwas sprechender sein (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments).

Weiter frohes mappen 
Silversurfer83
SHARCRASH (2022-09-16 23:27:33+00:00): it's the same :P :)
SHARCRASH (2022-09-16 23:28:27+00:00): and your not:building may be confused with "note="
mueschel (2022-09-17 08:29:09+00:00): "not:" is the documented and widely used prefix for this kind of situation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:not:
mueschel (2022-10-07 09:57:34+00:00): Please check this area - it got a large number of tags that don't look like they should be in OSM.
emersonveenstra (2022-09-14 12:45:21+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! The correct way to do dead ends is to select the end point of the road and make it a "No Exit" point, then routers will recognize the fact that the roads don't connect. Would you mind fixing that?

Also, generally it's not considered good form to make up names for things, names are meant to be actual on-the-ground names. Thanks!
eggie (2022-09-14 18:27:46+00:00): Tip  Aan reguliere wegen hoef je niet toe te voegen oneway=no..

Alleen als je het idee hebt dat iemand er oneway=yes van gaat maken voeg je die tag toe.

MBG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:49:54+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094467813/history has NO = 1698 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
NanMadol (2025-05-14 18:32:06+00:00): Hi Mateusz, thanks for reaching out about this. In this changeset, I moved information from a POI created by humano (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1230823728/history) to the new building polygon I created (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094467813/history) following the one feature, one element principle of OSM. I unfortunately don't know more about those usual tags, but I retained the information from the original creator. I would recommend reaching out to the person (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/humano) who originally added those tags for more information. Hope that helps!
eggie (2022-09-14 18:36:02+00:00): Tip Dit soort insteek parkeerplaatsen kun je het beste de toevoegin geven
parking=street_side 
parking_orientation=perpendicular. Dan worden de P's iets minder prominent weergegeven. Het zijn immers geen parkeerterreinen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side
MVG
eggie
markbegbie (2022-09-24 04:51:55+00:00): Apologies, this was StreetComplete combining changes, despite auto submit being enabled.
Mex (2022-10-02 19:09:23+00:00): Is the old restaurant sign still in place?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126174747
Frans S (2022-10-01 13:27:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126174840
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
mcliquid (2022-09-15 06:22:25+00:00): Hi,

deine Firmeneinträge haben momentan keinen Mehrwert und werden auch nicht angezeigt, da sie keinerlei beschreibende Attribute haben. Schau dir dafür bitte das company-Tag an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:company

Viele Grüße!
Frans S (2022-09-15 09:53:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Please don't add name tags like#amazonpsas #amazonctps

Please do not upload each single mapping but collect them.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126176175
mozilz (2022-09-17 15:45:29+00:00): Hi,
I recently surveyed the circumferential road 2 and a portion of it is still under construction and I tagged it as such.
This is the section I'm referring to:
Way: Iloilo Circumferential Road 2 (776635634)
Yukiro (2025-12-22 06:43:58+00:00): Polska dla Polaków
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:50:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094481908/history has NO = 1847 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
CranaeIsland (2025-05-14 18:37:51+00:00): Hello, thank you for the query. This person is no longer on the team, please refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126174651 for additional information regarding the history of these tags.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SHARCRASH (2022-09-15 14:27:04+00:00): Hello! Your edits seem very specific, so i'd like to understand... Why did you add this way as path and as not accessible? Since this way www.openstreetmap.org/way/209440254 is a track larger than paths for forestry/agricultural/off-road vehicles, shouldn't the one you added also be a track? Then, why the access=no + bicycle=yes + foot=no? access=* is for all types of mobility but then you add foot and bicycle=yes. No matter what extra specific mobility tags you add with "X=yes", the way stays restricted for all, hence why OSM's Carto map is greyed out and showing not accessible.
AB_13 (2022-09-16 06:29:50+00:00): Thank you very much for pointing this out. My entry refers to an official hiking route of the NaturWanderPark delux. Since I have no information about the possibility of using vehicles, I left it for safety with hiking and biking. If you have other information, please feel free to add it.
Also many thanks for the hint to the entry access=no. I will take another look and correct it.
SHARCRASH (2022-09-16 13:27:36+00:00): Thanks for the precisions! Firstly the most important is to stay faithful to reality and if we can't get the necessary information, we should suppose what seems obvious Unless that portion as path is really only physically accessible by low mobility users (one human, horse, bicycle, etc), i suppose that the entire way from one intersection to another is a track. That's what i see anyway on the LIDAR and aerial photos like Bing or others. If there are obstacles like a fallen trunk or block, there are tags to express such objects. 

For the access it is the same, tracks are made firstly for large vehicle of forestry, agricultural, etc not for the normal traffic by default. Also a way as track warns pedestrians etc that they are on such way and should expect such vehicles time to time therefore be cautious. Side note, horse riders affectionate them too since it is more comfortable for their horse. If you wanted to add an exception tag combination because you've seen this elsewhere or even in OSM's Wiki (don 't know who added this in there but its wrong) it was never meant that way since it adds interpretation, and as I said OSM Carto layer (official OSM layer) never accepted such exceptions, if access=no or =private it will grey out the way no matter what.
TohruAzusagawa (2022-09-19 05:59:51+00:00): 临海公交没有1路和2路，请检查。
TohruAzusagawa (2022-09-19 06:02:55+00:00): 为何绘制的线路只有走向没有车站？
tux67 (2022-09-14 14:34:01+00:00): Damit wäre die Adresse 3x vorhanden.
krb100 (2022-09-14 16:55:20+00:00): Besteht die Möglichkeit lediglich die Eingänge zu markieren ohne das einbeziehen einer Hausnummer?
krb100 (2022-09-14 16:58:15+00:00): Habs nun geändert
tux67 (2022-09-14 17:02:32+00:00): Klar, einfach die Adresse weglassen. Danke für's  ändern.
krb100 (2022-09-15 10:45:11+00:00): Nichts dafür! Jedoch vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
tux67 (2022-09-14 14:31:29+00:00): Gleicher Hinweis bzgl. der Hausnummer als Duplikat.
krb100 (2022-09-14 16:57:58+00:00): Habs geändert
Pink Duck (2022-09-14 12:03:39+00:00): Seems a bit unreliable to use imagery alone to know they've gone.
Sam_White (2022-09-14 12:11:10+00:00): Tagged incorrectly. Street complete note left Sunday following ground survey. Change implemented today.
Pink Duck (2022-09-14 12:13:42+00:00): How was it tagged incorrectly?
Pink Duck (2022-09-14 12:16:08+00:00): I usually add source=local_knowledge when using someone else’s note. Will verify also next time I pass by there.
Sam_White (2022-09-15 15:37:50+00:00): I left the note via Street Complete, as well as making the change.
The 'source=local_knowledge' tag is the incorrect tagging I am referring to, as I forgot to add it.
Sam_White (2022-09-16 07:09:02+00:00): I am usually remiss in adding the  'source=local_knowledge' tag, the majority of my edits around Norwich are undertaken with knowledge of the area, plus using imagery to align nodes more accurately.
Pink Duck (2022-09-18 09:20:06+00:00): Confirmed the change, deleted the excess node on the area below to neaten. Realised that that steps are actually still there, just hidden behind the front wood boarding and earth fill above. Raising the question of should unseen things be mapped? Probably not, hard to verify without digging :)
goodidea (2022-10-14 06:59:38+00:00): Hallo Vinzenz Mai!
Super, dass du das mit dem Leinpfad und den Zugangsbeschränkungen in Angriff genommen hast! Steht seit längerem auf meiner Liste, ich hatte auch die Schilder schon gecheckt und abfotografiert ... aber bin bisher nicht dazu gekommen.

Dein Text für "note" war nur leider zu lang! Nur maximal 255 Zeichen sind erlaubt, leider (nach "... und Schifffahrtsamt Mosel-Saar-Lahn mit dem" abgeschnitten). Ich checke das immer in einem Texteditor. Man kann hier nicht den vollen Text des Schilds angeben, er ist zu lang.

Ich würde z.B. diesen Text vorschlagen und als access:note taggen statt als note:

"Laut Beschilderung des Wasserstraßen- und Schifffahrtsamt Mosel-Saar-Lahn: Benutzung verboten, aber frei für Fußgänger und Radfahrer auf eigene Gefahr. Gesperrt für Mofas (Betriebsgelände der Wasserstraßen- und Schifffahrtsverwaltung des Bundes)." (246 Zeichen)

Damit ist ja alles Wichtige ausgedrückt und korrekt wider gegeben, auch wenn der Originaltext natürlich schöner wäre. Aber aufteilen z.B. in note_1 und note_2, wie das früher öfters gemacht wurde, würde ich es nicht.

[Man könnte, wenn man will, ein Foto eines Schild bei Wikimedia Commons einstellen und z.B. per access:wikimedia_commons=* verlinken ...]

Ich habe das mit dem Text auf einem Wegstück schon mal geändert:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37839942

Vielleicht willst du es an den von dir bearbeiten Wegstücken selbst ändern?

(Noch was zu dem Thema: ab Völklingen Karolinger Brücke – siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033577243 –  wundert es mich übrigens, dass der Leinpfad als highway=cycleway getaggt ist (auch Zugangswege) – das wollte ich auch mal noch checken ... kann ja eigentlich kaum sein, dass sich der Leinpfad dort ändert oder es für Fußgänger nicht erlaubt sein soll).

Viele Grüße!
Vinzenz Mai (2022-10-14 08:20:23+00:00): Hallo goodidea,

die Aufteilung hat wohl iD im Hintergrund vorgenommen :-( Mit JOSM werde ich nicht richtig warm ...
Dein Textvorschlag ist prima - und ein Bild kann nie schaden.

Die cycleway-Geschichte stand/steht auch noch auf meiner privaten Todo-Liste, wenn die Baustelle abgeschlossen ist. Ich kann mir genausowenig vorstellen, dass dies nicht auch in den Bereich der Schifffahrtsbehörde gehört.

Beste Grüße
Vinzenz
goodidea (2022-10-14 20:07:49+00:00): Und ich hab noch nie (bis auf einen kleinen Test ganz am Anfang) mit iD gearbeitet ... :-).

Ich glaube aber mal gelesen zu haben, dass manche Editoren einen warnen bei Texten mit über 255 Zeichen und andere nicht (da wird dann einfach abgeschnitten) ... Schön wäre, wenn die Anzahl Zeichen bei der Eingabe angezeigt würde; das macht JOSM aber z.B. auch nicht ... Da hilft nur der umständliche Weg über einen Editor, der die Zeichenanzahl anzeigt (z.B. kostenlose Version von BBEdit auf einem Mac) …

Wegen Leinpfad ab Völklingen: ich war am 11.10. dort auf der Karolinger Brücke. In Richtung Saarlouis kann man glaube ich auf den Leinpfad auffahren ... dort ist es noch als cycleway getaggt. Das Stück vor der Brücke habe ich schon mal geändert aus früherer Befahrung heraus ...

Richtung Saarlouis bin ich vor längerer Zeit auch mal mit dem Rad gefahren – das geht immer leinpfad-mäßig weiter. Aber ob und wo die Schilder stehen, kann ich nicht mit Sicherheit sagen ... Würde mich sehr wundern, wenn sich da was ändert bzgl. Schifffahrtsamt usw. Aber sollte man sich am besten vor Ort anschauen (da benutze ich dann Vespucci für unterwegs …).

Viele Grüße!
Vinzenz Mai (2022-10-14 21:50:54+00:00): Mich würde das ebenfalls wundern. Ich war zwar schon sehr oft bis Saarlouis, oft bis Mettlach und einigemal bis Konz - aber das war bevor ich bei OSM aktiv war und da habe ich nicht auf die Schilder geachtet ...
Beim nächsten Mal wird es anders :-)

Beste Grüße
Vinzenz