piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FreedSky (2017-07-21 17:37:37+00:00): Well, that's empirical. You should follow the definition. What he said makes sense.
Austin Zhu (2017-07-21 17:44:47+00:00): Yeah, I can also say that I have viewed many airports in OSM, but only some of them follow the definition. So I don't think it's persuasive.
4b696d (2017-07-21 17:58:03+00:00): @FreedSky: I don't know to whom you are referring to as "you" and "he" and I don't think that "the definition" exists.
@Austin Zhu: If you have read a lot of books then you certainly know more about this topic than I do, I only got my info from Wikipedia. I still would not consider these areas as part of the runway but if you do that is fine for me as long as you don't just want them to be rendered in grey.
Austin Zhu (2017-07-21 18:14:26+00:00): That's OK. I will not bother your fix a lot. I only care about airports modified precisely by myself(RJTT, RJAA, RJGG, RJBB, RJOO, etc.), and obviously you can still edit in a way you prefer. Thanks for your suggestions. :-)
user_5359 (2019-12-07 08:57:18+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key ww?
sommerluk (2017-07-25 14:27:35+00:00): Bonjour.

Les noms des carrefours que tu as ajoutés à OSM, tu peux les rendre visibles dans la page openstreetmap.org si tu ajoutes junction=yes (jonction routière en iD, marche seulement si le nœud fait partie d’une ligne)

En tout cas merci beaucoup pour ajouter les noms de carrefours. Actuellement, il y a très peu de noms de carrefour, et spécialement en Abidjan, c’est extrêmement important. Merci beaucoup !

Cordialement
Jipo (2017-07-19 09:36:15+00:00): Used to be 'Indian Spices'
oormilavinod (2017-07-20 04:27:54+00:00): hey Dashaaaaa welcome to OSM, great to have you map features on OSm, but you have changed a building to a park so as to facilitate you with pokemon go.  OSM does not support fictional edits. reverting your changeset.
encourage you to add ground truth and improve the map. have a great day
Nakaner (2017-07-19 15:37:16+00:00): Hallo Achim,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Die von dir hinzugefügten Beschreibungen entsprechen nicht unseren Richtlinien. OSM ist ein Projekt zur Erfassung von vor Ort überprüfbaren Fakten und kein Branchenbuch. Daher habe ich deine überlangen Beschreibungen mit werblichem Charakter entfernt, die restlichen Änderungen aber beibehalten. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50409582

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2017-07-19 15:37:34+00:00): siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%9Cberpr%C3%BCfbarkeit
DD1GJ (2017-07-19 11:32:52+00:00): Danke für den nun klaren Hinweis. Aufgrund der Verdachtsmomente aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26628184 werden die Hintergründe der Erfassungen überprüft.
DD1GJ (2017-07-28 06:25:55+00:00): Nach Rücksprache mit dem Erfasser wurden die Hydranten nach Sichtung vor Ort erfasst. Der zitierte Hydrantenplan dienete anach Abschluss der Erfassung zur Vollständigkeitskontrolle. Die weitere Kommunikation erfolgt ausschließlich über Mailadressen der HerzoWerke auf Ebene der Gchäftsleitung.
karitotp (2017-07-20 04:49:23+00:00): Hi Lesole. The highway that you deleted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325332223/history) is there according the satellite imagery, why it was removed of the map?
BR,  
Karito
segubi (2021-06-07 17:37:39+00:00): Ich bin gerade zufällig auf der Suche nach eigenen Taggingfehlern über das access=no Tag in Kombination mit bicycle=yes und foot=yes gestolpert - und das Tag entfernt. (Wiki: "Use the access=* key to describe a general access restriction that applies to all transport modes")
Grüße, Sebastian
eggie (2017-07-19 10:45:47+00:00): merged info with address-node.. deleted duplicate...
Warin61 (2019-03-19 04:01:41+00:00): Hi,
Sorry  but objects with only a name do not make any kind of sense.

What is 'visual arts 1"?
What is 'TLC'?

etc.
Suggest finding an appropriate physical tag for these features.
SSENTONGO ANDREW (2017-07-20 08:19:51+00:00): done
Krautix (2017-07-19 10:59:01+00:00): This change was only a correction of an existing end
Supaplex (2017-07-19 11:03:51+00:00): 請不要在現地有存在的狀況下，刪除如樹木之類的事物。
#tofix #DWG
user_5359 (2017-07-19 17:46:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node  to building!
user_6110846 (2018-04-29 06:37:32+00:00): Good Day Editing is removed.
1. Distortion of reality Spartak and . Nova Borova 
 Nova Borova 
is the village
Spartak - the residential  area  (a piece of the village of Nova Borova) and you modified Spartak from the suburb  to the village  
2 Distortion of borders of on ground adjusted for the inventory, addresses of houses and features of local addressing. These features are unique, differ from All-Ukrainian  - without saying about other countries. I agree with you - in the technical plan there was a horror in Nova Buda.
Supaplex (2017-07-19 15:27:11+00:00): #tofix keep the tree
gileri (2017-07-22 11:17:58+00:00): Est-ce vraiment le nom du chemin ? Ne vaudrait-il pas mieux faire un landuse=residential avec ce nom plutôt ?
gileri (2017-07-22 11:19:02+00:00): Aussi, le séparateur habituel des valeurs sur OSM est ';' (tag source), ça facilite le parsing d'en avoir qu'un.
tuxayo (2017-07-23 01:36:23+00:00): séparateur: oui, il faut carrément que j'utilise ça. Je me demande quelles autres mauvaises habitudes j'ai...
tuxayo (2017-07-23 02:13:04+00:00): nom vs landuse: j'y ai pensé vite fait (que mettre lotissement sur une voie est bizarre) mais par simplicité et facilité j'ai fait comme ça.

Maintenant que tu le dis, ça m'inquiète un peu sur la validité.

Mais en lisant ça, ça me semble valide: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contribuer_%C3%A0_la_BANO#Rapprochement_des_lotissements

Tu confirmes?

Et ça a du sens quand on regarde les adresses non? Ça remplace souvent la voie donc quand c'est le cas ça simplifie les données.

J'arrive pas à trouver comment mapper un lotissement à part.(quand la voie a un autre nom). Pourtant faudrait que ça soit documenté pour être bien mappé et surtout exploité.

Ça pourrait aussi être une relation site. Comme c'est le cas pour une cité universitaire par exemple. *quelques secondes de réflexion* Mais c'est encore différent car la cité a une adresse (celles qu'on connaît au moins) alors que là le lotissement en aurait pas.
OMG c'est bordel le géocodage d'adresse si on veut que ça marche pour tout.
gileri (2017-07-24 21:25:08+00:00): J'ai pas regardé BANO, mais effectivement si c'est le nom officiel de la rue en effet faut la mapper comme ça. Si ce n'est pas le nom de la rue, je pense que addr:place est plus adapté.

Mais ça empêche pas de tracer le contour du lotissement et ajouter son nom, car ils sont souvent délimités, vérifiables sur le terrain avec un plan etc.

Concernant les adresses dans un lotissement, pour moi les maisons/groupes de maisons ont des numéros/lettres la plupart du temps, en plus du nom de rue et du nom de la résidence. Pour les cités universitaires il y a une lettre/numéro de bâtiment, le nom de la cité, de la rue.
juhanjuku (2017-07-31 17:05:39+00:00): Osmose gives for seamarks error: Missing object kind
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=8&lat=58.642&lon=24.84&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&item=0%2C1%2C1010%2C1040%2C1050%2C1060%2C1070%2C1080%2C1090%2C1100%2C1110%2C1120%2C1140%2C1150%2C1160%2C1170%2C1180%2C1190%2C1200%2C1210%2C1220%2C1221%2C1230%2C1240%2C1250%2C1270%2C2010%2C2020%2C2030%2C2040%2C2080%2C2090%2C2100%2C2110%2C2120%2C2130%2C3010%2C3020%2C3030%2C3031%2C3032%2C3033%2C3040%2C3050%2C3060%2C3080%2C3090%2C3091%2C3110%2C3120%2C3150%2C3160%2C3161%2C3170%2C3180%2C3190%2C3200%2C3210%2C3220%2C3230%2C4010%2C4020%2C4030%2C4040%2C4060%2C4070%2C4080%2C4090%2C4100%2C4110%2C4130%2C5xxx%2C6010%2C6020%2C6030%2C6040%2C6070%2C7010%2C7011%2C7012%2C7050%2C7051%2C7060%2C7070%2C7080%2C7090%2C7100%2C7110%2C7120%2C7130%2C7140%2C7150%2C7160%2C7170%2C7190%2C8xxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
If beacon is not exact, you must propose some other value. Just 'seamark:' is hot enough.
juhanjuku (2017-07-31 17:07:26+00:00): Please don't remove *beacon' if you don't have better solution.
juhanjuku (2017-07-31 17:09:05+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Beacons
malcolmh (2017-08-02 08:15:43+00:00): The seamark tags fully describe these objects. No other tags are necessary except to add additional information.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Buoys
juhanjuku (2017-08-02 09:39:40+00:00): With "beacon" tag they are rendered on standard OSM, without - visible only on special maps.
I suppose, this is reason why OSMOSE algorithm shows them as error.
malcolmh (2017-08-03 07:07:27+00:00): man_made=beacon tag are mainly used for historic beacons (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbeacon).

The rendering of seamark objects is not done by the main OSM renderer. To view these objects, use one of the seamark websites: http://opennauticalchart.org/?permalink=true&zoom=15&lat=59.45801&lon=24.75101&seamarks=true&coordinate_grid=true or http://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=15&lat=59.45594&lon=24.75200&mlat=59.46655&mlon=24.74155&layers=BFTFFFFFFTF0TFFFFFFFFF
Nakaner (2017-07-19 15:21:48+00:00): Hallo Mirandol,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Ich habe diese Änderungssatz zurückgesetzt. Dass ein Parkplatz privat ist, rechtfertigt nicht, ihn zu löschen. Stattdessen kennzeichnet man ihn mit dem Tag access=private explizit als privat. 

Viele Grüße

Michael
Mirandol (2017-07-19 17:50:01+00:00): Moin Michael, ein Parkplatz auf öffentlichen Karten eingetragen suggeriert doch aber die öffentliche ParkMÖGLICHKEIT, welche hier jedoch nicht gegeben ist. Im Umkehrschluss würde bedeuten, dass von jedem Privathaus das Carport oder der Stellplatz als "Parkplatz" eingetragen werden sollte. Ist dem so? Es sogar einen öffentlichen Parplatz direkt neben der Schwarzen Scheune. Sogar mit Hinweisschild. 

Gruß Sascha
Nakaner (2017-07-20 07:27:18+00:00): Hallo Sascha,

der Parkplatz ist in den Daten als privat gekennzeichnet. OpenStreetMap ist ein Projekt zum Zusammentragen einer Geodatenbank, die als Datenquelle für Karten, Routenberechnungen etc. dient. Ob die Kennzeichnung eines Objekts als privat von unseren Datennutzern auch so ausgewertet wird, liegt außerhalb unseres "Hoheitsbereichs".

Der Kartenstile "OpenStreetMap Carto", dessen Karten auf der Hauptseite des OpenStreetMap-Projekts eingebunden sind, stellt als privat gekennzeichnete Parkplätze anders als normale Parkplätze dar (helleres Blau).

Ein einzelner Stellplatz ist kein Parkplatz, aber eine Fläche auf der (siehe Luftbilder) mehrere Fahrzeuge parken können (und tun), ist ein Parkplatz.

Viele Grüße

Michael
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-20 06:49:07+00:00): Please explain what you're doing, or stop adding your name on random things. I reverted all your changes.
4004 (2019-02-17 22:25:52+00:00): we do have approved tags for "<3.5t" values
Jay May (2019-02-18 09:21:31+00:00): Ehm. I am not sure about what you refer to (because I did this like 1 year ago), but if you refer to adding access tags for "barrier=border control", they have no influence at all over navigation issues (which is why I added that legend at the time in name=*). However, definitely those tags should be added to the "highway=*" tags if they hadn't been added. I don't have the time to check that right now ;)
4004 (2019-02-18 19:04:12+00:00): Yeah, sorry I wasn’t clear. Was referring to the border control nodes. I can see why it might need a name for some specific cases, but with weight separation/restriction, why can’t we just use maxweight=3.5 as opposed to putting it in the name on all of the nodes?
Jay May (2019-02-19 09:12:16+00:00): Well, to me it would have been even better, but as I told you - the issue is that it has absolutely no influence over navigation if you use the correct tags additionally to "barrier=border control" (like hgv=designated, etc.). However, it does have an influence when you do that for the road itself. I can't check whether I had done that at that time because I am not in front of any computer, so if you want to do that, go on! :)
4004 (2019-02-22 23:25:12+00:00): but it's the issue with the routing engine, we don't have to adjust to it. i'll try adding it to the road
Rowland (2017-08-08 12:05:00+00:00): OS OpenMap still lists these as A roads - I can find sources that confirm A4012 -> B5704, but do you have any for the downgrading of the A5130?
SiHollett (2017-08-08 12:47:54+00:00): Woburn Sands Town Council's Newsletter from Spring says "Good news, we hope, as at last it has been agreed that the A5130, the main road through Woburn Sands will be downgraded to a B road right through from Kingston Roundabout to the Hockcliffe A5 junction at the end of
May" http://www.woburnsands.org.uk/Woburn-Sands-Town-Council/UserFiles/Files/Newsletter%20Spring%2017%20for%20web.pdf

Other sources, such as Wavendon PC, and Central Beds BC talk about downgrading these roads to B road as part of the weight restrictions imposed post-Dunstable bypass opening. The A-Z 2018 map has these as B roads, and the B5704 number going to Ridgmont, giving me a cross-reference that my assumptions based off the research I did on the road numbering changes in the area related to the bypass opening was correct and that I finally could change the routes north of Hockliffe that I wasn't 100% on. I still don't know what number the route through Woburn Sands has, but I know it is a B road - or will be very shortly.

OS is just slow on the changes, although they have changed it now: with Landranger mapping and the zoom one layer out on their open maps having the B5704 from Hocliffe to Ridgmont. It has the road through Woburn Sands as unclassified on the Landranger zoom (probably as it hasn't been assigned a number), but A5130 on the zoom level out (despite ending on the B5704).
Rowland (2017-08-08 15:26:31+00:00): I like that source, and I appreciate that it's good to update the map ASAP to propagate to SatNavs - I don't know if you can help find anything to back up the declassification of the rest of the A5130 between the A421 and A509 (Newport Road) (not that this was part of your change) - best I can find was a SABRE page that said it was going to happen in 2010, but the road markings still reflected it being an A road last time I went that way (admittedly, that was prior to the most recent bit of Fen Street being built)
SiHollett (2017-08-08 15:54:59+00:00): The A5130 north of here wasn't part of my changeset. However, the SABRE thread is correct, AFAICS. MK Council's road department seem to be really bad at notifying of changes to classification - including making them on the ground unless they are actually replacing signs (eg H9 still signed as A421 for a lot of it, despite that route moving to H8 about 20 years ago).

OS now marks it as unclassified at 1:50k. Google Maps Streetview (because I can't site check, especially not 7 years ago) has the A5130 number removed from that road on signs at Kingston Roundabout between Oct '10 and July '12 and at  between Oct '10 and Aug '12 at Northfield Roundabout. However signs along it don't seem to be changed, ditto pavement markings (ie numbers painted on the road). Certainly they don't want through traffic on it, and there's council minutes and plans and stuff talking about downgrading.
Bence Mélykúti (2018-10-24 21:25:26+00:00): I don't understand the notes on the running tracks (Városmajori futókör, Laktanya utcai sportpálya) in this changeset: "Please do not merge these ways into one closed one: closed ways represent areas, therefore some services might render this as an area"
I thought that an area=no tag would sort that issue - do you know any particular service that breaks if you merge into one way while applying area=no?

The relevant reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area
"If the assumption that a closed way together with other tags defines an area is misleading, area=no can be used to clarify the situation. E.g., leisure=track, sport=running, area=no is just a closed running way."
leveskockaa (2018-10-28 18:18:08+00:00): I belive OsmAnd was rendering these tracks as areas which was misleading at best in the above mentioned instances. If a way has different properties, for example the track is not lit in the whole length or the surface is different, it may be cut into pieces to better represent reality. The default map has just started rendering these tracks with a thin green line - this closed way has area=no and is rendered correctly in OsmAnd and mapnik: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37126210

I may revisit these running tracks as needed, when there is no point in having multiple ways (anymore), I'll merge them.
ignaciolep (2018-12-31 11:32:26+00:00): Voy a cambiar el ALPR a cámara de velocidad ya que hay sensores de inducción magnética.
nammala (2017-07-20 05:06:47+00:00): Hi aturinda,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding not appropriate road classification in the areas . Please follow the road classification wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway for better understanding of highways.

Regards,
nammala
nammala (2017-07-20 04:37:33+00:00): Hi OLUPOT DANIEL,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding random names to buildings,garden,trees. Make sure you don't give random names. OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth.

Best Regards,
nammala
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-24 06:26:36+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only.
grin (2017-07-20 22:23:56+00:00): Sajnos ennek a pontnak nincs "tartalma", nem adtad meg a típusát. Ez épület? Helyi területnév?
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-14 14:13:53+00:00): Hallo Anonym0815. Kannst du bitte bei
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172425378
nochmal gucken, was du da taggen wolltest?
Im Moment steht da `zaun=service`. Soll es entweder ein `barrier=fence` (Zaun) oder `highway=service` (Zufahrtsstraße) sein? #singleuse_key
dcapillae_old (2017-08-17 20:16:53+00:00): ¡Hola, Pilar!

¿Qué significa "name=105.000€"? Parece un precio de venta. La etiqueta "name" no debe usarse para tal fin. La comunidad debe velar por la calidad de los datos por el bien del mapa. ¿Podemos corregirlo? ¿Qué opinas?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Control_de_calidad

Un cordial saludo,
Daniel
micahcochran (2017-08-02 00:57:16+00:00): Hello.  First, I want to thank you for adding the KOA Campground.  I think this should be tagged as tourism=camp_site, not as leisure=park (mainly for city parks).  Tagging it that way points to the main activity, camping.  There are also much more information about the campground that can also be added:  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site

Thanks for the contributions,
Micah
Ghybu (2017-07-19 13:42:27+00:00): I have a doubt about the tag for vegetation. These are small sized oak and spaced in some areas but may be dense in others areas. Here is an example:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Ovacik1.jpg
Ghybu (2017-07-19 13:46:33+00:00): I have a doubt about the tag for vegetation. These are smalls sized oaks and spaced in some areas but may be dense in others areas. Here is an example:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Ovacik1.jpg
Geofreund1 (2020-12-03 16:14:10+00:00): Hallo dsp77,
könnte es sein, dass du die HN Dorfstraße 76 ... 78 in Kleinzerlang um 1 versetzt eingetragen hast?
Bitte um Überprüfung
Gruß
Geofreund1
dsp77 (2021-10-22 13:03:50+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,
ich muss gestehen, ich weiß nicht mehr wie ich mir das vor Ort notiert habe. Wenn du da eine verlässliche Quelle hast, ändere das doch bitte. Ich habe zur Zeit keine Möglichkeit, dass vor Ort zu überprüfen.
Gruß 
dsp77
dsp77 (2021-10-22 13:25:27+00:00): Ich habe es gändert.
Geofreund1 (2021-10-22 14:09:35+00:00): Danke
Gruß Geofreund1
DaveF (2017-07-20 17:40:41+00:00): You've created a duplicate of schools at Noss/North school
Rowland (2017-07-22 19:18:41+00:00): Nope, not a duplicate - it's a different school, with the newer Noss Primary also replacing Hillhead Primary School
DaveF (2017-07-22 19:41:26+00:00): Yes, there were duplicates. You've just delete one of them!
Rowland (2017-07-22 20:31:37+00:00): I would have done it sooner, but was blocked whilst I was researching which of the conflicting sources was more accurate
DaveF (2017-07-22 20:51:23+00:00): You should have "researched" before adding features. You could of done it "sooner" but instead you went on to add further chainsets before being blocked. Your blocks are for a reason. Please try & comprehend why.
SomeoneElse (2017-07-19 13:33:57+00:00): Hi Rowland,
You're still creating changesets without comments.  Please stop doing this immediately.  If you do you'll get blocked again.  See link to previous discussion at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1415 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-24 06:27:56+00:00): Please avoid adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
IrlJidel (2017-07-19 18:09:24+00:00): Hi

Is  'ATSR Edit Map' a custom app you wrote?

You seem to be putting way tags in your changeset tags.   Is this a bug or intentional?
IrlJidel (2017-07-19 18:19:10+00:00): see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Tags_on_changesets
MCDA (2017-07-19 20:20:51+00:00): I don't get the logical for these edits.  You changed the maxspeed tag to 51, then back to 50.  Is this a automatic edit ?
przemas75 (2017-09-24 12:16:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303664836
Tam naprawdę nie można na piechotę wejść tą drogą?
GerdP (2017-09-02 09:15:14+00:00): Please explain:
What is meant with highway=ucap on a building?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508712794
Is this related to www.ucap.org ?
BCNorwich (2017-07-24 05:31:01+00:00): Way:  (508713808) delete duplicated/self intersecting outline of playground which included building
Aleks-Berlin (2017-07-21 10:35:02+00:00): Hi Rowland, please do not add empty tags, like "name"="" . Thanks, Alex
Rowland (2017-07-22 19:14:19+00:00): That wasn't intentional - not sure why that showed up
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-20 06:36:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

A staircase is better tagged as "highway=steps". By convention, the direction of the way should preferably point uphill, with incline=up added.  See this for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps
hoserab (2017-07-19 18:32:42+00:00): Thanks for fixing this. :)