piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wombatmaper (2022-07-29 14:38:12+00:00): Hello, you can find issues resolved by the iD editor in the changeset tags ("resolved:..."). You can find out more about changesets and tags here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Tags_on_changesets .
In these tags you will also see only one warning, indicating that 44 warnings were resolved / fixed but only one new one caused. Thus the total amount should not have gone up, what validator are you using?
wombatmaper (2022-07-29 15:06:18+00:00): As for the trams, took me a while to find out what happend, but I believe this to be an issue in iD that I reported here: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9224
wombatmaper (2022-07-29 15:36:46+00:00): As for the entrance nodes: Here I did not see that the shop / service nodes also, incorrectly, contained entrance tags. I will work on separating these two.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-01 21:56:58+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081874450 you tagged `residential=condominium` which is no longer recommended to use (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:residential=condominium?uselang=en for details) would you mind changing that?
skyper (2022-12-28 16:28:55+00:00): Hi tobim91,
Du hast nach einem Review gefragt.
iD ist leider was Fehlermeldungen angeht und wie diese (automatisch) korrigiert werden nicht optimal.
Warum hast Du `shop=boutique` in `shop=clothes` geändert? Auch macht es keinen Sinn `FIXME` in `fixme` zu ändern. Das erhöht nur unnötigerweise die Versionsnummer der Objekte und bläht damit die Datenbank auf ohne dass die Probleme behoben werden.
Zusätzlich ist ein Review bei über 200 bearbeiteten Objekten über ein größeres Gebiet nicht einfach.
Etliches sollte wohl zurückgesetzt werden.
Viele Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2023-01-12 15:55:33+00:00): Habe ich teilweise zurückgesetzt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131195355
pyrog (2022-08-14 08:04:51+00:00): Salut Geek,

La fusion des 2 ways à cassé la relation de l'itinéraire entre les poteaux Itinéraire Aux Enfinges - Belvédère des Trois Escaliers.

Tu peux le voir sur l'historique de la relation https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/route/13726409/changes?impact=true

Je corrige (en recoupant le sentier en 2).

A+
Yves 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025027167#map=17/46.38679/5.69486
one_half_3544 (2022-12-26 18:35:49+00:00): Можно использовать тэг capacity:tents=2 для того, чтобы обозначить, что это место под 2 палатки
emersonveenstra (2022-07-27 22:10:19+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding the Coffee shop. Please note that street names must not be abbreviated in addresses, would you mind changing it to "West Liberty Street"?
worace (2022-07-27 22:20:44+00:00): Oh, thanks for the tip. Will update it!
emersonveenstra (2022-07-27 22:30:32+00:00): No problem, thanks for updating it!
mfolle (2022-07-27 20:48:54+00:00): erro juvenil que fiz anos atrás, vlw pelo conserto
adrianojbr (2022-07-27 21:33:34+00:00): 👍
Arlo James Barnes (2022-11-13 04:03:21+00:00): it looks like you applied the incline tag to the place relation...was this intended?
Natfoot (2026-01-08 09:40:47+00:00): probably not
george1201 (2022-07-29 22:33:42+00:00): Dann könntest du den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3275319 doch auf "erledigt" setzen.
Herrenälber (2022-07-30 05:47:42+00:00): Sorry - nicht gesehen, dass es dazu einen Fehlerhinweis gibt. Ist erledigt.
A67-A67 (2022-07-27 20:42:56+00:00): In Nederland taggen we bedrijven op de bestaande adresnodes, die uit de BAG worden geïmporteerd. Deze horen niet verwijderd te worden.

Ik zal de adresnode herstellen.
richlv (2025-06-05 20:56:58+00:00): Hey, just to confirm - does this shop=farm exist?
I don't recall seeing it when passing by, but I might just be not too attentive towards such things :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2910671198
ugly ahh mfer (2022-07-27 20:16:03+00:00): The resolved box should be higher since the window froze and I had to close the browser.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-30 19:40:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5226677 - can you take a look? I am confused by tagging here

maybe you are still nearby or remember what you tried to express
SzymonH (2022-07-29 12:17:18+00:00): Dlaczego ten fragment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961121379 spadł do kategorii highway=service ?
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-30 13:34:33+00:00): Hi acob@YorkCoPA,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
Jacob@YorkCoPA (2022-08-01 13:21:22+00:00): 2018 PEMA Imagery. I'm also the GIS Analyst of York County. I was using Multiple Layers from York County's Open Data. The biggest is Building Footprints which isn't on Open Data quite yet. Does that answer your question?
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-01 14:53:43+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
Did you manually trace all your building footprints?
Jacob@YorkCoPA (2022-08-02 17:06:12+00:00): I did manually trace over the buildings.
Cézar Augusto (2022-08-02 18:52:18+00:00): Você poderia me explicar por que você mudou a sintaxe dos telefones? Não há nada de errado com eles.
adrianojbr (2022-08-02 19:58:34+00:00): Boa tarde, Cézar!

Para ficar de acordo com a documentação sobre a etiqueta phone=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone?uselang=pt-BR#Spacing_and_separators).

Basicamente, menciona-se que é convenção separar ao menos o código internacional do resto do número.

Já o código de área deve ser separado preferencialmente onde eles ainda são usados distintamente para chamados domésticas, que é o caso do Brasil.

Ainda, por conveniência para facilitar a leitura e de acordo com o uso geral, é comum também agrupar o restante em 4 dígitos (o que gerou uma questão sobre o que fazer com o nono dígito dos números de celular -- alguns deixam o nodo dígito separado, outros preferem juntar no primeiro grupo).

Dito isso, outro ponto é que separador usar (espaço ou hífen). Não há consenso e nem a documentação é taxativa, já que para o formato internacional E.164 separadores são irrelevantes.

Assim, na região onde acompanho os mapeamentos, para efeitos de padronização e facilitar a verificação, e por ter visto que era a forma mais usada, estou tentando manter no formato: +55 47 1234-5678.

Por fim, há dois modelos concorrentes para dados de contato. O chamado "antigo" e o novo que usa o prefixo "contact:" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact).

Prefiro usar o novo modelo pois ele está preparado para as redes sociais. Assim, atende essa finalidade e fica mais fácil de acompanhar nos editores, pois as tags "contact:" ficam juntas, assim como as de endereço que começam por "addr:".

Espero que tenha ficado claro.

Abraço!
Cézar Augusto (2022-08-03 13:22:07+00:00): Ficou sim, muito obrigado pelos links e a explicação.
Hufkratzer (2022-07-27 21:33:46+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081891482 sieht mir eher wie ein Reitplatz aus, den würde ich als Reitplatz taggen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz . Im iD einfach "Reitplatz" eingeben und auswählen. Das Reitanlagen-Tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding) wäre eher für eine komplette Anlage incl. Stall usw. geeignet.
Mansha20 (2022-07-28 06:41:26+00:00): Wurde als Reitplatz getaggt/korrigiert.
MxxCon (2022-07-29 23:31:32+00:00): Hello.
So there are 2 convenience stores here with identical address?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124156963
Jo Cassel (2023-09-24 14:37:41+00:00): Bitte kein "Naturschutzgebiet" bzw. die Kurzform "NSG" im name-Tag verwenden. Habe auf "Meißner" zurückändern müssen.
Jo Cassel (2023-09-24 14:38:38+00:00): vgl. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Schutzgebiete_des_Natur-_und_Landschaftsschutzes#Hinweise_f%C3%BCr_Deutschland
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-07-27 20:42:47+00:00): Moin christiansp1998,

Achtung: Der Wert heißt 'separate' und nicht 'seperate'! Korrigierst Du das?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
christiansp1998 (2022-07-27 20:46:02+00:00): Moin,

natürlich... zu spät..

LG
christiansp1998 (2022-07-27 20:49:20+00:00): In #124157839 geändert
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-07-28 06:22:58+00:00): Super, danke!
ovruni (2022-07-27 23:28:01+00:00): Hola Wexa Edward, gracias por contribuir a OSM. La etiqueta de nombre esta destinada a usarse solamente cuando un objeto tiene un nombre particular, no para poner descripciones como "Edificio Tambopata." [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may%C3%BAsculas
user_5359 (2022-08-30 18:13:18+00:00): Hello! Short question? Why has the building the key admin_level with non numerical values?
Allison P (2022-08-30 18:40:22+00:00): And addr:street needs to match the street name exactly. So they shouldn't be all caps, and if the street name is still different then it needs to be fixed.
DUGA (2023-06-10 16:19:10+00:00): Many low quality garbages were imported, please compare your source with PEMA 2021.
DUGA (2024-01-27 17:57:21+00:00): We have not seen you correcting any garbage after the unblock, for those including bogus addresses as well as wrong building footprints. Should we send a cease and desist letter to York County and request your managers to take a look?
Tex2002ans (2025-07-27 22:49:38+00:00): Hey Jacob,

I recently came across this data through taginfo.

I see a *huge* amount of junk "addr:street" names that are in:

- ALL CAPS
- 1 word only

and they are missing the endings, like:

- Street
- Road

- - -

I fixed some of these up in:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169583339

- - -

I noticed a similar pattern in many of your older changesets, and it looks like it happens across York County.

If you could help chip away at cleaning that up, that would be great! :)
lonnez (2022-08-02 05:37:04+00:00): This is quite a large change without a specific changeset comment. Could you elaborate on what these changes are?
Dodko (2022-07-28 06:42:09+00:00): Pozrite si dokumentáciu k značkám
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:inscription
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:description
PT-53 (2022-07-31 07:37:07+00:00): Hallo landini,
Du hast - wohl versehentlich -  diese Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081929410/history
als Verbindung von 2 Rettungstreffpunkten erstellt.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
landini (2022-07-31 07:53:29+00:00): Gelöscht.
MxxCon (2022-07-29 23:39:44+00:00): Hello.
I see you are using StreetComplete 42.0. Please consider upgrading to a newer version since it has some nice new features.😅👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124158240
Jacob101 (2022-10-16 20:57:04+00:00): Brookbottom methodist church no longer exists as a church (since ~2012)

http://planning.highpeak.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServlet?PKID=138720

I have reverted your change to the building in the changeset 127637449
Frans S (2022-08-03 11:37:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
See this picture with comments. Blue arrows shows more buildings




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124158753
Frans S (2022-08-03 11:38:05+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UeFZe4RGGLaquujZ74iTsfV4L8GHYSvk/view?usp=sharing
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124158753
Frans S (2022-08-03 11:27:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
First: please do not upload every single mapping you made. Collect them.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
You also overlooked some buildings
See this picture
https://drive.google.com/file/d/134MjeAH_VArk-OLwaev8FeMkVTSmCyWm/view?usp=sharing



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124158897
Filip009 (2022-07-29 05:43:22+00:00): Dobrý deň, prečo vytvárate druhú prírodnú rezerváciu, keď už tam je prírodná rezervácia je?
Jastrab1 (2022-07-29 06:13:40+00:00): Dobrý deň, ospravedlňujem sa.
Filip009 (2022-07-29 06:46:23+00:00): Svoju chybu teda môžete opraviť.
4004 (2022-07-31 00:27:09+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
с такими дорогами так же полезно указывать тип покрытия
Dodko (2022-07-28 06:52:44+00:00): To by nemal byť malý stožiar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:man_made%3Dmast
ale
man_made=tower
tower:type=communication
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:man_made%3Dtower

výška sa zapisuje takto
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:height

ak pri stožiari je budova ste ju nemali zmazať
Jastrab1 (2022-07-28 18:45:01+00:00): Pri stožiari sa nenachádza žiadna budova.
jonsger (2022-07-28 12:14:22+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

ich glaube beim Biogaskraftwerk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/647519738 sollte in plant:output:electricity eher sowas wie 2300 kW rein, anstatt 36000 MWh. Siehe auch https://www.bio-energie-hasetal.de/unternehmen VG jonsger
NGL-engel (2022-08-10 09:00:18+00:00): Hallo jonsger, 
  Danke für den Hinweis - ich war mir bei der Angabe in der Tat etwas unsicher. Hatte aber gedacht das ich es letztendlich richtig gemacht hätte - anscheinend aber wohl doch nicht :-(
Ich werde den Eintrag löschen. 
Mit freundlichem Gruß NGL-engel
limes11 (2022-07-28 16:50:21+00:00): Hi,

In what way is access of Burg Are restricted after sunset? I don't remember any signs or gates. 

Cheers, Limes
complete_gth (2022-08-02 20:11:29+00:00): Moin, der name=* tag sollte nur für den "echten" Namen verwendet werden, ich glaube nicht, dass hier an der Turnhalle ein Schild mit "school gym" steht. Sowas kann man ggf. in description=* schreiben, wobei bereits aus den Tags der Turnhalle die Verwendung ableitbar ist. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen
Wenn du willst kannst du das ändern.

VG complete_gth
Nakaner (2023-02-24 13:25:05+00:00): Hallo,

warum hast du den Weg von highway=path auf highway=track geändert?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Jakka (2022-07-28 06:43:37+00:00): you added double information.
your Maps me not updated ?
I delete your input
Trevor_1 (2022-07-28 22:23:52+00:00): Hi, please try to make your changesets cover a smaller area in the future.
eggie (2022-07-28 11:43:12+00:00): Zo dat was veel werk. Ziet er goed uit.

MVG
eggie
spughetti (2022-07-28 12:58:20+00:00): 😸
Константин Гам (2023-05-29 09:28:57+00:00): Добрый день! А можете проверить существование точки https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9915943027
Не валидируется через оф.сайт магазина...
Miikul (2023-05-30 19:44:59+00:00): Здравствуйте , Светофор имеет сложную структуру управления и разветвления , и не на всех сайтах, что являются сайтами Светофора ,они все указаны . В указанном профиле ,был паблик непосредственно самого магазина (каждый магазин Светофора ,как я заметил,когда вносил данные ,имеет свой паблик ВК и все данные разных сайтов ,а актуальность проверенна по этим  пабликам  )
Константин Гам (2023-05-30 21:19:20+00:00): Я заметил что у них полно поддельных сайтов сео мусорок... Наиболее достоверным показался лишь 1... Ок, может я ошибаюсь.
mueschel (2022-07-28 18:53:09+00:00): Hi,
you added many buildings with these tags:
base_ahd
struct_id

These don't seem to belong to OSM. Can they be removed?

The validator also shows many buildings overlapping with each other. It seems there is some rework needed to get the outlines mapped properly.
MindaugasS (2022-07-28 00:04:08+00:00): Kita vertus, praktiškai visame Vilniuje ant vaikų darželių yra tokie užrašai: Vilniaus lopšelis-darželis „Smalsučiai“ ir pan., t.y. ir su bendriniais žodžiais, ir su kabutėmis. Nežinau, kaip čia geriau.
ygcgjp5 (2022-07-28 07:21:51+00:00): Tas perdarymas į „Vilniaus lopšelis-darželis „XYZ““ Kaune ir Vilniuje buvo mano išmislas, nes
a) brūkšneliai ir kabutės rašomi belekaip, nes visi žymėti skirtingų žmonių
b) prirašytas miesto pavadinimas kad palengvinti paiešką (nes pavadinimai dažniausiai kartojasi skirtinguose miestuose)

Tomas buvo sakęs kad dabar gaunasi ilgi ir gremėzdiški pavadinimai, tačiau iš kitos pusės patys darželiai save vadina pilnu pavadinimu su miestu.
MindaugasS (2022-07-28 15:29:50+00:00): Aišku. Beje, ši diskusija prasidėjo nuo pastato Naujakurių g. 37. Aš ten buvau pakeitęs kabutes iš "tokių" į „tokias“, bet Tomas nurodė palikti tik patį pavadinimą. Hm, gal reikėtų kokio nors sutarimo, nes tikriausiai visi vaikų darželiai turėtų būti žymimi vienodai (ir privatūs naujuose pastatuose, ir „tarybiniai“ tų laikų tipiniuose pastatuose).
segubi (2022-08-14 15:39:13+00:00): Die Gutsroute Hiddenhausen habe ich seinerzeit nicht angelegt, da ich vermute, dass sie nur ein Relikt ist. Ich habe mal ergänzt, was ich gesehen habe (insb. über information=route_marker, name=Gutsroute Hiddenhausen;xyz) zu finden. Im Internet praktisch inexistent. (bis auf: https://mapio.net/pic/p-48713950/ und http://www.achim-bartoschek.de/details/nw5_04.htm?k in der Wegebeschreibung). Ich fürchte, sie ist letztlich abandoned:route=bicycle
Ökkel (2022-08-15 23:09:58+00:00): Ja, das kann gut sein. Das wäre dann genau so ein Fall wie die Cityroute in Herford.
willkmis (2022-07-28 00:13:54+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like in this changeset you re-drew a number of features on top of previously existing features in the database, like roads, buildings, and the botanical garden. Places like Parking Structure 2, Hilgard Ave, etc. are already mapped. Did you mean to duplicate these features, or just to modify them? Maybe they were somehow not visible to you in the editor?
Best,
Will
plantlife22 (2022-07-28 00:51:06+00:00): Hi Will, 

My intention was to modify them but I also did not see some of the features in the editor.
willkmis (2022-07-28 01:25:10+00:00): OK, maybe they didn't load correctly, or possibly you had a layer switched off. Could you see any existing features while you were drawing? It looks like in your subsequent edits you attached paths to existing features, so perhaps you figured it out.
I'll try to delete the duplicates (like the extra Hilgard and Le Conte Avenues and the second botanical garden) later on tonight.
willkmis (2022-07-28 06:10:31+00:00): Cleanup completed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124167667
plantlife22 (2022-07-28 06:16:21+00:00): Thank you, Will!
Hufkratzer (2022-07-28 19:42:16+00:00): Hi, you have removed the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74711696 and replaced it with leisure=horse_riding . This object looks like a building in the aerial view, therefore I assume it was not intended to remove the building tag. Maybe it is a riding hall / indoor arena (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall). The horse_riding tag is not appropriate for buildings, it is for complete riding centres, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding and some better examples in this region:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32128201 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537192242 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018938003
IGMCDL (2022-07-28 22:32:29+00:00): Hi, thank you, it should be better now.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-06 13:29:37+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3629810 ? 

Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081960941 representing steps/stairs existing here?
Fizzie-DWG (2022-12-02 01:11:57+00:00): Hi Jodi. When you add a name to a complex like this, please use proper capitalisation i.e. Brookland Retirement Village, rather than full capitals for the lot. They should also be listed as landuse=residential, which will allow you to add the name to the area.
喵耳引力波 (2022-08-07 07:04:58+00:00): Fixed
mvexel (2022-07-28 17:47:42+00:00): I agree with 1300 S, not so sure about 1700 S. I would argue keep 900 E and 1700 S tertiary, change 1300 S to secondary.
mvexel (2022-07-28 17:49:09+00:00): Also because 1300S continues all the way to redwood and beyond (as California Ave) whereas 1700S and 900S kind of dead end on the W side. 800S (and Indiana) on the other hand could be Secondary?
Oregonian3 (2022-07-28 21:54:19+00:00): With regards to E/W roads:

Yeah I definitely think 1300 S is secondary west of 700 E. East of 1300 E I think it's a clear tertiary instead, having stop-controlled intersections rather than traffic signals. But between 700 E and 1300 E I'm not sure. I've noticed that more traffic seems to use 1700 S in this area than 1300 S (maybe because of how steep the hill on 1300 S is).

Aside from the freeway interchange that 1300 S has, I think 1700 S and 1300 S are pretty comparable. Both are one lane in each direction east of State. West of State, 13th has two lanes in each direction while 17th has a mix of one-lane and two-lane sections (the difference is likely due to the freeway interchange). But I view 17th as actually the better through route across the valley precisely because it doesn't have an interchange: it's significantly faster to use.

I could certainly see 800 S being secondary at least to 900 W as well (although its importance diminishes west of 900 W). A year ago I probably wouldn't have agreed, but with the 9-line trail construction and road diet on the parallel 900 S I'm anticipating that 800 S will absorb most of the traffic from it. That being said, the portion of 800 S east of West Temple is clearly a busier and more important route than the portion to the west (and the traffic signal timing on this street is horrible, much worse than 13th or 17th I've noticed).
Oregonian3 (2022-07-28 22:01:03+00:00): With regards to N/S roads:

I think 900 E is a pretty clear secondary at least south of 3300 S. The speed limit, road quality, and traffic on this section are on par with the other N/S secondaries in this area like 1300 E and 2300 E, and pretty clearly ahead of the N/S tertiaries like 1100 E or 2000 E. Plus, traffic that originates to the south on 900 E where it's highway 71 usually stays on 900 E to reach both 3900 S and 3300 S eastbound rather than taking the out-of-the-way route to 700 E.

North of 3300 S I could definitely see the argument for tertiary though. The speed limit and pavement quality both sharply drop off at this point. And traffic destined for the Sugar House district from the south often takes 700 E instead (despite being longer distance-wise it can often be quicker time-wise). However, SLC is pretty clearly trying to get traffic to use 900 E, 1300 E, or 700 E instead of Highland Drive/1100 E through the heart of Sugar House, and it might be worth leaving it at secondary to reflect this.

North of 2100 S the importance diminishes even further; I'd probably leave it at tertiary north of there. However, it does see more use than the parallel tertiary routes of 300 E, 500 E (south of 800 S), 1100 E, and 1500 E, so I could be persuaded to keep it secondary all the way until South Temple.
hanchao (2022-07-29 01:28:50+00:00): 中央商场这个楼有50层这么高？
building:levels=50
michaelIsADullGuy (2022-08-04 00:19:05+00:00): 误标：
height=50
hanchao (2022-07-28 09:54:18+00:00): 为什么又创建一个City of Nanjing？

上一次的讨论
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123888243
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-07-28 15:34:43+00:00): FYI

这是第三次创建City of Nanjing的变更集： https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124177896#map=19/32.00611/118.72595
michaelIsADullGuy (2022-08-04 00:18:14+00:00): 以后不在创建了。