piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skyper (2020-09-01 22:35:30+00:00): Hi

Using the latest available imagery source is not enough. You need to use more or better sources. I doubt that the imagery is the only source you use.

Simply, looking at the OSM-History would have revealed that you are readding outdated data.

By the way, where are the required CS tag as demanded in the guidelines?

> People looking at individual changesets that are part of a organised mapping activity should be able to tell as soon as they look at a changeset. Changeset comments should include the unique hashtag described on the wiki page under Organised Editing/Activities/Name of the Activity (as described in the Process section), and link to that page.

Did you ever read them?

skyper
deepikja (2020-09-02 06:15:31+00:00): Hi,
Thanks again for the inputs. Our team is already looking into this request and soon will be implemented. 
Regards
Deepikja
skyper (2020-09-02 10:05:52+00:00): Hi

What will be implemented? If you do not comply to the rules, stop mapping all of you, right, now. Implement the solution, test and demonstrate it and then you can restart working on OSM-data.

You did not answer any question
* sources ?
* OSM-History?
* How do you gonna change your mapping to not making similar vandalism again.
* Where is the "on the ground source" mentioned in the wiki?
* Who is the person responsible for review?

You seem to simply go on mapping. Instead of taking your time to really react on the criticism. Did you have a look at every edit you made and recheck it to have an on the ground source? That is your buisness. How about adding the proper source to every CS you have uploaded so far?

skyper
deepikja (2020-09-04 12:46:30+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for your response. Our lead had initiated the discussion in the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. Thanks for your valuable inputs.
Regards
Deepikja
skyper (2020-09-04 13:31:49+00:00): Many questions were not answered.

Some are directly toward you as an individual.
deepikja (2020-09-08 05:35:46+00:00): Hi Skyper, 
We always edit based on available OSM resources and yes we do check History and validate the edit according to the OSM wiki editing guidelines. My genuine apologies for the miss from my end in this changeset. While editing, we make sure to add quality data into OSM. Hence,All the edits made by us go through secondary check. In case of any errors, we are given feedback based on which we fix them back in OSM. Thanks for your valuable inputs. I would consider this learning for my future edits.
Regards
Deepikja
Kovoschiz (2020-08-26 12:13:57+00:00): Please don't add `description=` as `name=`
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89966967
Kovoschiz (2020-08-26 12:14:45+00:00): Especially as it's not a specific description either
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89966967
DD1GJ (2020-08-26 11:49:24+00:00): Hallo, willkommen Bei OSM

Im Projekt gilt der oberste Grundsatz, dass zur Erhaltung der Versionshistorie bereits bestehende Einträge nicht gelöscht sondern ergänzt werden.
Zudem beansprucht DHL das Urheberrecht für alle Daten und Inhalte seiner Webseite. Liegt eine Genehmigung zur direkten Datenübernahme vor?
BauhausMobilityLab (2020-08-26 14:51:58+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für Ihr schnelles Feedback.
Anfängerfehler, wir werden versuchen, den Urheberrechtsinhaber zu kontaktieren. Vorerst sollten die Daten entfernt werden.
MKnight (2020-08-26 15:04:15+00:00): Ich habe die Änderungen in #CS89979367 zurückgesetzt.
BauhausMobilityLab (2020-08-26 15:22:39+00:00): Vielen Dank!
Lachgast (2020-08-26 20:54:52+00:00): Ben benieuwd naar het resultaat! Misschien als je zou navigeren naar een nabijgelegen parkeerplaats.
Buurtje (2020-08-27 08:00:27+00:00): Goedemorgen, als de wijziging is doorgevoerd in mijn navigatie-app Magic Earth ga ik het zeker proberen. Hou je op de hoogte. Gr. Buurtje
FbrG (2020-08-26 17:03:30+00:00): Hallo madaopen,
willkommen bei OSM und Danke für deinen Beitrag :)

Bevor du jedoch Deine Änderungen hochlädst, achte bitte immer auf die Warnungen des Editors. Dir ist aus Versehen eine Kreuzung verrutscht (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=89969158).

Ich war so frei und habe es korrigiert :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89983360

Viel Spaß noch beim Mappen
FbrG
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 20:23:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Herrieman (2021-05-14 11:50:55+00:00): Some of the given maxspeed tags do not seem to check out. Some are tagged as 30 km/h, which should be 50 km/h. I'm currently busy editing the Zuidtangent network, so I will correct those, but wanted to let you know. If there is something I am missing, let me know of course!
pio2_122 (2020-08-26 12:44:15+00:00): Ogólnie dobra edycja, proszę tylko nie dublować adresów - adres ma już dodany budynek obok (zapewne plebania).
Z góry dzięki!
Kovoschiz (2020-08-26 13:01:23+00:00): Please don't add undescriptive `description=` as `name=`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89971622
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 20:26:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:51:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89972594
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:39:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89972858
Kovoschiz (2020-08-26 13:00:24+00:00): Please don't add undescriptive `description=` to `name=`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89973021
kapazao (2020-08-27 11:09:48+00:00): Please do not use generic names for elements who have no name. Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89973602
KvB Cycles (2020-09-08 20:55:14+00:00): Ok. Can you suggest what we do when the place itself doesn´t have a name? I don´t know what else to call it so please provide constructive feedback when posting comments so we can correct our mistakes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89973602
kapazao (2020-09-09 12:04:20+00:00): Hi, you don't need to use any name, it does not have it. Only leave it empty.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
kapazao (2020-09-09 12:05:54+00:00): Maybe watching this place helps you
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608733095
Regards
kartler175 (2020-08-29 08:38:34+00:00): ... aber dabei die Grenze „zerschossen“: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1112228#map=14/51.6238/9.5859
skorpion62 (2025-05-05 09:11:48+00:00): Hallo,
ist das wirklich ein Fußweg,
und dürfen hier keine Autos fahren? Laut Bing Luftbild stehen an diesem Weg 2 neugebaute Häuser.
Viele  Grüße skorpion52
Jakka (2020-08-26 18:48:49+00:00): mouvais ajouts... 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/50.6553/3.3985
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840918248#map=10/50.4053/6.1716
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 07:19:35+00:00): Hello!

You used
incline=up-
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839722732/history

Have you maybe meant
incline=up
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
SHARCRASH (2020-08-26 13:23:03+00:00): + tags corrected on buildings
VitalieS (2020-09-23 01:12:41+00:00): Bună,
Sediul ambasadei de pe str. Moara Roșie, 23 nu mai este folosit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89975461
Polarbear-repair (2021-09-14 07:50:09+00:00): wie kommst du darauf, in einer Selbsthilfebox sei ein Doktor eingebaut??
eggie (2021-04-04 14:45:15+00:00): deleted attraction
VictorIE (2026-05-13 13:16:02+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for dragging up and ancient changeset. :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840927423/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840927440/

Might these be holes 1 and 6?
Stereo (2020-08-30 18:07:09+00:00): Hi Tom! Did you see the house numbers 12, 12A and 13 place Bleech on the ground? I wonder whether 12A and 13 exist at all..
user_3961358 (2020-08-31 14:59:10+00:00): I honestly didn't see the numbers themselves at the place. But several letterboxes at the building corner with, only names on them. I assumed the entries of the buildings at the backyard area. I didn't want to enter.
Might be all of the boxes for number 12. But I rather adressed too much than too little, considering it's Fiels with many tiny homes.
opendcc (2020-08-26 18:35:46+00:00): Hallo,

warum hast Du die Adresse rausgenommen? 

Servus
Geo-Tobi (2020-08-26 19:52:19+00:00): Servus, die Adresse ist bereits auf dem Gebäude vorhanden. Das war redundant. Adresse auf Gebäude ist die sinnvollere Variante, also hab ich's bei der Fläche gelöscht.
opendcc (2020-08-26 20:01:33+00:00): Hallo, ich weiß, es ist rendundant. Aber z.B. mein 'POI-View' im Navi erlaubt das Anrufen / Hinfahren - sofern beim POI eine Telefonnummer bzw. Adresse dabei ist. Ich mache daher immer bei POIs wenn möglich Kontakt und Adresse mit dazu. Und wenn POIs ausgeblendet sind, dann soll die Adresse noch sichtbar bleiben.

Servus
Geo-Tobi (2020-08-26 20:15:31+00:00): Kannst die Adresse gerne wieder hinzufügen, ich werde sie nicht erneut löschen. Wird aber schwierig sein, 100% der POIs mit Adressen und Kontaktdaten zu füttern. Ein Kampf gegen Windmühlen. Mische mich da aber nicht ein. Grüße
bxl-forever (2022-06-25 22:00:25+00:00): Hello, thanks for this import.  (I know, it was two years ago.)

Is having "Station" in every name relevant?  We don’t do this for other kind of objects, such as railway stations, bike-sharing or car-sharing stations.
What do you think?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-06-29 18:13:22+00:00): Imho these are more a 'ref' for the municipality. I'm not watching these closely, so feel free to retag or to remove the name tags.

(Fun and completely irrelevant fact: the pumps in Ghent, placed by de fietsambassade do have a name stickered on them, such as 'Jules' or 'Sophie')
Pollux71 (2020-08-26 19:00:36+00:00): Kul att vara en till som ritar i området!
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 20:28:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
trigpoint (2020-08-26 17:34:02+00:00): Hi
Tertiary seems rather unlikely, its a cul de sac. Probably residential but imagery isn't up to date enough to see.

Cheers Phil
vladaboitik (2020-08-27 08:44:21+00:00): Hi
Thanks a lot for your note! I changed the class.
habi (2020-08-27 10:18:21+00:00): Hey!
You deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/837441849 in this changeset.
For me (in JOSM) it now shows up as a bunch of unconnected nodes.
Can you put it back on the map?
habi (2020-08-27 10:19:47+00:00): And also deleted the way making out this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838613608, it's only the four nodes at the edges...
aixbrick (2020-08-26 16:18:44+00:00): Hallo,
seit wann heißt das Gewerbegebiet "Alter Schlachthof"?
Dass das Gebäude Mitglied der Gewerbegebiet-Relation ist, ist vermutlich nur ein Versehen?
Gruß
aixbrick (2020-08-26 17:28:05+00:00): OK, das Gebäude hast du aus der Relation entfernt. Und der Name?
aixbrick (2020-08-27 17:25:35+00:00): Name korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90039259.
VIPINDAS K (2022-08-24 11:13:40+00:00): w840938203
I think this road is not exist. it is not a tertiary road. please recheck. 

Happy Mapping...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89977766
dpolovinkin (2025-12-11 18:05:15+00:00): hi, well it's this again - so many incorrect buildings here which are just copy pasted and too big,  I just reverted this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175814629

will add properly sized objects here
SHARCRASH (2020-08-26 14:36:10+00:00): + tags corrected
kartograph (2020-08-28 14:08:31+00:00): HI :-). The height of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840941307 (added with 493m) seems not correct. Typo?
Kuehle (2020-08-29 21:10:40+00:00): yes that was wrong. I am new and had already updated. sry
kartograph (2020-08-30 19:28:11+00:00): Great! Thanks for fixing and welcome :-).
DaveF (2022-06-19 18:32:23+00:00): Hi
I'm curious: What do the Odds & Evens refer to?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840945937
AndersAndersson (2020-08-27 11:17:14+00:00): Hej!
Jättebra beskrivning i changesetet!

Man får skapa en relation med en multipolygon och sen lägga olika roller (inner/outer) på sträckorna. Du hade lagt multipolygontaggen direkt på sträckan. Jag fixade till det. Du kan kika i mitt changeset hur det hanteras.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90023299
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-09-01 18:38:56+00:00): Hi!
Thanks for your contributions!
One small remark from me -- please, map roads in Belarus carefully -- most of them are already mapped and correctly tageed.
E.g., this highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840951358) is a duplicate of the already existing and correctly tagged tertiary road.
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-09-01 18:39:17+00:00): I'm deleting this duplicate.
user_5359 (2020-09-02 19:30:45+00:00): Please use in OSM either the local language or English (for the keys explicitly British English).
roga741 (2020-08-26 15:26:37+00:00): commercial line/ open only 9:00, 17:00, 18:45
https://rasp.yandex.ru/water/serpuhov--sady-serpukhov
rab (2020-08-27 13:55:23+00:00): lake kariba runs out
ftcat (2020-08-29 08:05:33+00:00): By doing it this way you break the Kariba relation. Can't see why the wall has to be an area. Am reverting it to fix the Kariba relation
ftcat (2020-08-29 08:13:09+00:00): Also be aware of imagery offset and seasonal nature of rivers and lakes in this part of the world. Lake currently extremely low due to a number of years of poor rains, imagery may be out of date and differences between imagery providers will mean you can always make changes but they may not reflect the actual situation on the ground
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 20:29:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 20:50:45+00:00): Dag pthofstra,
building:level is een eigenschap van het gebouw, dat hoort dus niet op de adres-node getagd te worden.
Ik pas het even aan.
SHARCRASH (2020-08-26 15:44:02+00:00): not route enhancements, rather positions enhancements
ndm (2020-08-26 19:28:57+00:00): This looks a bit strange -- you've drawn a park right on top of a recreation ground.Some maps might not display a recreation ground -- but that doesn't mean it's not correct.

So, not sure what you're trying to achieve, so thought I'd ask -- rather than just undoing it.
Carl Andrews (2020-08-26 21:05:00+00:00): Hi there!

That area is my local field for football pitches, running markers and fittness (play area) I noticed it wasn't marked as a play are and only 3 of the dark squares were marked rather than the whole field which I marked. However I am on a tablet so editing was complicated. Any correction I will correct on a laptop tomorrow.
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 20:37:38+00:00): Dag pthofstra,
De bedoeling is goed, maar het is niet de bedoeling om name:nl te gebruiken om de soort van een boom aan te geven.
Wellicht even inlezen in de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:natural%3Dtree
Leo Slager (2020-08-26 20:48:18+00:00): gebruik in plaats daarvan dus 
genus=Acer
genus:nl=esdoorn.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree/List_of_Genus,_Leaf_cycle,_Leaf_type
pthofstra (2020-08-27 15:01:42+00:00): Dank! Ik zal de wiki bestuderen.
abakus_uploader (2020-08-26 22:31:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ndm (2020-08-26 19:34:59+00:00): Just in case: If the "cycle" tracks are for off-road / bmx bikes, then they might need some extra tags.
Carl Andrews (2020-08-26 21:06:53+00:00): I am trying to make multiple paths if you can see in the satellite view. I don't know how to link the path together in multiple directions. I will try on another device tomorrow.
IlBano (2020-08-28 20:41:19+00:00): Ciao Patrozzo e benvenuto in OSM.
In questo changeset hai aggiunto dei poligoni per identificare i campi coltivati.
Diversi nodi di questi sono in comune con nodi di altre feature come strade e corsi d'acqua (esempio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840965357). Questo modalità rende più complicata la manutenzione della mappa e ti consiglierei di evitarla definendo dei nodi dedicati per i poligoni dei campi che vuoi mappare.

Grazie

IlBano
literan (2020-08-26 16:46:20+00:00): а здание зачем удалять? оно стоит на месте
user_5359 (2020-11-10 04:50:54+00:00): Hello, what is the meaning of the tag s=residential (see https://www.osm.org/way/840965807 for example)?
PT-53 (2020-08-28 09:42:37+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
diese Fläche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840969157
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Grüße
OF-1 (2020-08-28 15:24:09+00:00): Hallo Peter,
Fehler behoben ...
Grüße
!bm (2020-09-06 14:50:20+00:00): Hey tordans, wieso keine stands? Muss ein Versehen sein, korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90483046 --bestegrüße!bm
tordans (2020-09-06 15:48:52+00:00): Danke! Keine Ahnung, warum die Angabe in wieder rausgeflogen ist. BG
eggie (2021-04-04 14:08:55+00:00): deleted
mariotomo (2020-11-04 15:03:52+00:00): "ab del Cid" es el nombre así como está en la portada, o la abreviación/simplificación que le pusiste.  y si es una abreviación, quién lo va a mejorar?  porque además pusiste tres nombres diferentes?
mariotomo (2022-06-26 21:56:45+00:00): mejorada por fin en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122852447
Simone Saviolo (2020-08-27 15:36:55+00:00): Ciao, per favore non cancellare del dettaglio esistente. So che alcuni mappatori non concordano con l'idea di mappare i singoli appezzamenti, ma dove ci sono già non cancellarli. Grazie.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89983536
Jrachi (2020-08-27 15:51:42+00:00): Se sei del posto e sei sicuro che siano appezzamenti e non alternanza di colture, ok, mi sta bene!
Va bene, anche se non esistono più o se sono diversi da ortofoto a ortofoto...
Se sei sicuro che siano appezzamenti separati.

Ma senza andare a fare indagini, tu sei uno di quelli che uniscono landuse, track, edifici, ferrovie, torrenti e canali, e spesso a nodi alterni?
Perché passo il tempo a separare landuse mescolati di tutti i tipi con way di tutti i tipi. In qualche occassione dopo la separazione ho completato una track o un canalino che non si poteva vedere.

E per i landuse forest che vedo come campi coltivati?
Simone Saviolo (2020-08-27 16:06:56+00:00): Se per "sicuro" intendi che ho controllato bene le ortofoto, sì, sono sicuro: non sono andato in mezzo alla risaia a controllare chi era l'agricoltore :)
Siamo perfettamente d'accordo sui landuse uniti alle strade. So che qualche tempo fa la situazione era disastrosa nelle colline novaresi. 
Non so di cosa parli coi landuse=forest. Di solito mi occupo del Vercellese, e lì ce ne sono pochi.
gnesss (2020-08-27 18:19:02+00:00): Looks like it's to the north of the area you mapped to me.. 52.42272/-1.21109
Jez Nicholson (2020-08-28 07:12:55+00:00): oh yes, thank you, got it! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90063511
user_5359 (2020-08-26 18:48:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If a street has a tag ref="US 130" his name couldn't be "US 130".
Robert Whittaker (2020-08-26 19:09:57+00:00): Could I ask where the routes/alignment of the footpaths https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840989696 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840989697 came from? They don't match the GIS data from Suffolk CC for the public footpath, and looking at aerial imagery it seems unlikely that what you've mapped is the alignment of a physical path on the ground. (Any path on the ground would be much closer to the field boundary, and probably wouldn't cut through the wood.)
Ian Glen (2020-08-27 05:56:19+00:00): Poslingford 7 has been removed pending resurvey - it was in error
Ian Glen (2020-08-27 06:21:15+00:00): Cavendish FP 8 has been corrected to align with DS
Facalderonm (2020-09-06 21:18:03+00:00): Cambios revertidos por no cumplir las guías de la comunidad. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia
Fra00 (2020-08-26 19:24:37+00:00): Why did you make the roundabout oval? It is not.
SekeRob (2020-08-26 20:01:14+00:00): See the edit was undone without waiting for answer which is in the satellite imagery.
Fra00 (2020-08-26 20:02:45+00:00): Unless they changed the roundabout this morning, I am sure it is not oval since I was there yesterday. In which satellite imagery is it?
Fra00 (2020-08-26 20:07:10+00:00): Oh, you used Bing. If you pay attention, you can see the image is distorted in that area.
Stereo (2020-08-30 18:35:04+00:00): Hi Tom, it's me again :) I'm wondering if you're sure that 7A rue Scheerbach exists on the ground? It doesn't exist on the Cadastre, and I can't find any reference to it online.

Happy mapping,

Guillaume
user_3961358 (2020-08-31 14:53:20+00:00): Hi Guillaume,
There is a former golden housenumber 7a on the dark facade and several letter boxes right next to it in the indoor entry.
ACT only has the info communes send them. The older the building, the smaller the chances are they've got it.
Stereo (2020-08-31 15:02:54+00:00): Hey, thank you! I sometimes send out a couple of house numbers that are missing to Paul Mootz at the Cadastre. I'm working a lot on conflating the official and the OSM address databases right now, which is why you see me in your changeset comments :).

When I find an address that exists but isn't in the Cadastre CACLR database, I tag it with 'ref:caclr=missing' and/or 'note:caclr'. You can see a map at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/XyM

Happy mapping

Guillaume
Stereo (2020-08-31 15:04:36+00:00): It's also not the Commune's fault sometimes: people invent house numbers themselves for many reasons, some of them not even bad.
user_3961358 (2020-08-31 15:10:15+00:00): Thanks for the tip, much better solution than opening a service ticket on the geoportail every time. 
I didn't imagine invented house numbers, besides the very common issue of unregistered people, was so common. I'll tag it accordingly :)
Leo Slager (2020-08-27 10:04:38+00:00): review:
Gebouwen en adressen worden rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster. Als er iets niet klopt dan kun je daar een terugmelding doen:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=164632.34038713&geometry.y=503049.17652679&zoomlevel=7&objectId=0995100000827604&detailsObjectId=0995010000827605
Het adres dus niet nog een keer toevoegen aan het gebouw. Bijgebouwen krijgen geen adres. En de naam van het gebouw is niet "woonhuis".
Dat pas ik even aan.
Truchin (2020-09-09 12:45:00+00:00): Ave
Comme tu t'es fait bloquer tes précédents comptes OSM, peux tu au moins faire en sorte de contribuer proprement ?
Merci
Thomas