piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
angys (2018-03-09 16:32:36+00:00): Can that imagery used for iD?, I would like to do an update for new LATAR exit at Bandar Tasik Puteri.
AkuAnakTimur (2018-03-10 09:48:45+00:00): Where? Show me the location first.
AkuAnakTimur (2018-03-10 09:52:26+00:00): Hit the share button (make sure marker is included) and copy it over here.
angys (2018-03-10 10:29:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/3.2719/101.4747
angys (2018-03-10 10:30:46+00:00): https://www.hmetro.com.my/mutakhir/2017/06/239518/persimpangan-bertingkat-bandar-tasik-puteri-dibuka
AkuAnakTimur (2018-03-10 15:50:00+00:00): Good enough? If this is fine, I will send you a link, tomorrow the earliest. https://i.imgur.com/jzBMFos.jpg

Click Custom, and copy & paste the given URL. http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
angys (2018-03-10 16:24:00+00:00): So if I want to use this in iD, I would need to copy the link and fill it into the Custom bar.
trigpoint (2018-02-12 18:36:25+00:00): Hi, something has gone a little wrong here, I doubt that the name of the bus stop has been changed and unless something has been demolished please simply change the tag to disused:amenity=fuel. A close garage is still a landmark.
Cheers Phil
zstadler (2018-05-07 18:50:29+00:00): Hello Gil and welcome to OSM!
.
In this edit you have added access=no to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278566467
.
It seems like access is permitted by foot, bicycle and vehicles. What access is not permitted?
dgitto (2018-02-12 11:03:30+00:00): welcome.
please consider the use of more useful changeset comments. not only "edit" forever
Constable (2018-02-12 11:04:44+00:00): Why did you map this thing as a building?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560618777
There's no building in the middle of that road
Constable (2018-02-15 17:44:21+00:00): hi there, that building is still waiting to be deleted sir, please fix it up,
thanks
Constable (2018-02-15 17:44:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1296612
Spanholz (2018-11-13 10:53:01+00:00): Are you sure with the alignment here? All layers show the same alignment except Mapbox. But you used the Mapbox layer to align the roads. I'm just interested
saputra deo (2018-11-15 03:29:19+00:00): i just add bridge and use DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery
Tomas Straupis (2018-02-12 07:37:21+00:00): Pakeičiau į tourism=guest_house, nes tai labiau atitinka paslaugas, aprašytas http://www.sysossodyba.lt/
yxoc (2018-06-26 06:23:17+00:00): John, why are you are removing ref:FR:STIF tags from bus stops? Like the one for Havre-Haussman direction opera of ligne 81.

-yxoc
johnparis (2018-06-26 19:47:22+00:00): Hi, and thanks for asking. I removed that ref in cases when I discovered it was wrong after talking with nlehuby, who had added most of them. I intend to replace those (and a few thousand others!), probably in a day or two. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/johnparis
yxoc (2018-06-26 20:34:15+00:00): Hi John, OK, nothing against removing incorrect refs. I thought that the one I had put on this node was correct since I got it from niehouby's tool  microcosm.5apps.com/opendata_bus.html

Looking again at this I have to admit that the situation is quite confusing, at least the order of the two stops on opendata is inversed wrt what I have observed on location. I guess I wait for your automatic edit and then check on site.

-yxoc
johnparis (2018-06-28 05:47:48+00:00): Looking at that one node (3829714353) it seems possible I made a mistake, as the intermediate ref:FR:STIF:stop_id code was wrong, and I later changed it. It's also possible STIF changed it, as they do from time to time. The automated edit is complete.
user_5359 (2018-02-12 18:16:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
bigbug21 (2018-04-10 05:17:38+00:00): Oh Vorsicht: Nicht jede Bahnstation ist ein Bahnhof (railway=station), gerade kleinere Stationen und solche ohne Weichen sind Haltepunkte, die mit railway=halt getagged werden. Auch die Station Fürth-Unterfarrnbach ist ein Haltepunkt.
John-O (2018-02-15 22:08:56+00:00): I think `access=customers` might be more appropriate?
user_5359 (2018-02-12 18:11:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
LivInTheLookingGlass (2018-02-19 04:07:47+00:00): Hi. You requested a review, so I took a look. While what you put was arguably correct, there were a few minor things that I cleaned up. First of all, parking aisles don't normally have street names. Second, the other parking aisle should have been represented as a single, two-way road rather than two one-way road. Relevant changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56479152
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56283728
Geo Dät (2018-02-12 10:40:36+00:00): Der Zaun verläuft natürlich nicht in der Wegmitte, sondern unmittelbar am Rand der Wege. Leider kenne ich keine bessere Darstellung in allen Zoomstufen als den Zaun über die Weg zu legen.
Die jetzige Darstellung von FvGorden ist jedenfalls weit von der Realität entfernt.
eggie (2018-02-12 07:59:17+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Константин Гам (2019-01-13 12:12:21+00:00): Корректируя перекрёстки, не плохо бы на местности побывать. И не вносить несуществующие светофоры
Michael Dobrynin (2019-01-13 12:45:57+00:00): Возможно, в чем-то ошибся внося коррективы, но я тут почти каждое утро проезжаю. Так что, не плохо бы быть менее категоричным, высказывая предположения.
Константин Гам (2019-01-13 13:32:26+00:00): Я высказал вполне факт, проезжаю по местности - светофора нет и не было, а в карте есть и внесли его вы, м?
Michael Dobrynin (2019-01-13 17:49:34+00:00): Ну, этого просто не может быть. Повторюсь, я тут чуть не каждое утро проезжаю на работу и на этом перекрёстке сейчас работает светофор. Вероятно, вы о каком-то другом светофоре или именно о перекрестке Варшавской и Победы?
Готов даже завтра запись с регистратора выложить, если не забуду ;-)
Константин Гам (2019-01-13 20:00:53+00:00): Речь о несуществующем светофоре !на линке! при движении с победы на варшавскую направо.
Michael Dobrynin (2019-01-14 06:54:54+00:00): Честно говоря, не понятно, что за "линк", но именно уточнения, о каком именно светофоре идёт речь, я и добивался с самого начала.
Да, действительно, на упоминаемом вами участке перекрестка светофора действительно нет.
Michael Dobrynin (2019-01-14 06:58:25+00:00): Спасибо за актуализацию!
Хотя с некоторыми выводами все-таки поторопились ;-)
Michael Dobrynin (2019-01-19 18:22:32+00:00): Раз уж тут обсуждение есть и насколько я понял, вы довольно опытный редактор, просьба рассмотреть возможность корректировки Литейного проспекта на всем его протяжении в плане его расширения - сделать по "дороге" в каждом направлении, а не одну двустороннюю, как сейчас. Мало того, что выглядит в некоторых масштабах не очень красиво, так и по сути неправильно - развороты/повороты разрешены, где не запрещены, но и на встречку выезжать нельзя...
FraukeLeo (2025-05-20 05:36:44+00:00): Hallo ilmlaender, die Absicht dahinter verstehe ich, aber die Ausführung halte ich für etwas gewagt. leisure=dog_park markiert ein speziell als Hundefreilauffläche gedachtes und angelegtes Grundstück, nicht den Gültigkeitsbereich einer verwaltungsrechtlichen Regelung zum Leinenzwang. Zumal es sich hier laut note ausdrücklich gar nicht auf die Fläche bezieht, sondern nur auf die darin befindlichen Wege.

Vorschlag: Nimm die Fläche weg (die existiert so nicht) und tagge dog=unleashed an die Wege.
Константин Гам (2023-06-09 15:14:19+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Хотелось бы увидеть доказательство невозможности проехать здесь: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560645951
xronos (2023-06-09 15:25:34+00:00): без проблем - увидите. вернусь в понедельник-вторник -- пришлю) если там не построили мост, если там по прежнему брёвнышки...
bernardo60 (2023-09-27 04:31:26+00:00): I wonder why you changed from path to track. This is less than 2m wide, impossible for a car to pass. I change back to path. I went there today on my bike.
whb (2018-02-13 23:02:42+00:00): Wurde das Verbotsschild (motor_vehicle=destination) wirklich entfernt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156194374/history
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=WqrlbTtowXjbJK9Y2_6M8Q
whb (2020-07-25 14:12:08+00:00): Das Verbotsschild steht weiterhin, Änderung rückgängig gemacht.
user_5359 (2018-03-12 15:16:17+00:00): Kleiner Hinweis auf den Changeset 56992501: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56992501 es geht auch die Änderung, die Du hier durchgeführt hast.
user_5359 (2018-02-18 19:28:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Javier Sanchez (2018-02-15 10:51:06+00:00): With the current direction of Calle Acero, Calle Benítez is not accesible. Please check this note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1300811
Pikse (2018-12-20 15:13:19+00:00): Kas raiesmike kaardistamine põõsastikena (scrub) on ikka hea mõte? Kui vana raiesmiku tagasi metsaks võib märkida?

Silt natural=scrub tundub olevat mõeldud eelkõige aladele, kus on püsivalt ülekaalus põõsastaimed (mida noored puud pigem ei ole).

Metsamaa loetakse üldiselt ka pärast raiet metsamaaks, üldjuhul hakkab seal üsna pea uus mets kasvama. Põhikaardil igatahes raiesmikke muust metsamaast ei eristata. Mulle tundub, et see pole ka siin kuigi otstarbekas.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-25 13:25:01+00:00): 
    Hello!

    Sorry for bothering about an ancient edit.

    But is PFM:RoadID=2 meaning anything at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560651705/history ?

Can you remove this tag or replace by more clear one? It looks like debris from GPS trace import, handling similar tags on this object would be appreciated

(if there is more than one surviving tag like that from your edits: do you prefer separate message for each, list of all at once or something in between?)
Zainab Ramadhanis (2024-01-26 11:10:19+00:00): Hi! 

Sorry just noticed your message. I just checked the edit and the tags had been deleted. 

I don't think I added those tags on my edits, but I agree to separate that kind of information on tags to avoid misinformation on OSM.
RafalR (2018-06-04 09:38:09+00:00): Tag building jest tu zbędny, nie należy używać go dla obszarów.
user_5359 (2018-02-12 18:02:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
Øukasz (2019-08-28 23:28:00+00:00): Hello Albhadly, Welcome to OSM

You have deleted one important polygon, thus making the whole landuse=residential relation broken. You have done the same in other parts of Amarah. 

Please learn a little more about how relations work before modifying the data. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon is a great place to start, and please let me know if I can help you with any questions.

Regards
eggie (2018-02-12 09:34:51+00:00): Volgens mij is het zo prima gelukt. Je kunt verder evt. website= en Phone= e.d. nog toevoegen.
eggie (2018-02-12 09:08:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-02-12 09:20:23+00:00): Hi... 
Wat bedoel je met motor_vehicle=private . 
Het is volgens mij een fietspad met cyclebarriers. 
Graag reactie

What do you mean with motor_vehicle = private ? It's a cycleway with cyclebarriers and not accesseble for cars.
adiq77 (2018-02-12 10:39:55+00:00): The cycle/pedestrian way is accessible for emergency vehicles and I've seen some utility service vans driving there. 
Might be that 'private is not good description.
eggie (2018-02-12 11:22:00+00:00): No . it's better to remove that tag. 
Sometimes you see emergy=yes, but not on a cycleway. 
Thanks for reply.
eggie (2018-02-12 11:58:36+00:00): removed motor_vehicle =private
CloCkWeRX (2019-01-12 02:59:18+00:00): Hey, great work with the buildings in this area :)

Two handy tips, you can make the buildings more "square" by using the shortcut "S" in ID; and you can also indicate a house from the preset options on the left.

Keep up the good work!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-02-12 09:13:53+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56280149, 56280159, 56280166, 56280170, 56280174, 56280178, 56280184, 56280189, 56280195, 56280255, 56280260, 56280263, 56280267, 56280273, 56280280, 56280290, 56280293, 56280307, 56280309, 56280313, 56280332, 56280342.
user_5359 (2018-02-18 19:40:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
abakus_uploader (2018-02-12 23:31:09+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2018-02-13 00:12:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273454270
abakus_uploader (2018-02-12 23:31:11+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
msevilla00 (2018-02-15 09:10:02+00:00): Hay que precisar esos límites pero la edición de algo nuevo simepre es bienvenida!.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56287985
Mapperson (2018-02-19 15:29:14+00:00): I don't agree with your tagging change here, please revise. - Testing Comments for our team
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56288605
user_5359 (2018-02-18 19:40:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
Tomas Straupis (2018-02-12 11:15:21+00:00): Miškas ir parkas yra skirtingų klasifikacijų objektai. Miškas rodo, kad plote yra medžiai. Parkas nieko nerodo - tai gali būti medžiai, gali būti pieva, gali būti kūdros ar dar kas nors.
Ratty (2018-02-13 15:22:56+00:00): Почини,пожалуйста, обратно: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=82.80984&lat=55.08272&zoom=12
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
user_5359 (2018-02-18 19:41:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
mueschel (2018-02-16 13:19:55+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier einige neue Tags verwendet (TSO, DSO, Spannungsebene), die es sonst nirgends gibt. Kannst du das eventuell in gebräuchliche Tags ändern?

Gruß, Jan
SAnugroho (2018-02-12 12:09:41+00:00): Cleanup with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56291962
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
Constable (2018-02-12 17:43:04+00:00): watch out, this one is made up of two separate buildings https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/560690220 
Please make sure you map it correctly.
Thanks
dgitto (2018-02-12 22:09:00+00:00): benvenuto in OSM.
non basta mettere il solo tag name, è necessario almeno un tag per dire di cosa si tratti. in questo caso credo basti piazzare i tag sull'intera area e specificare che si tratta di "area commerciale"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial
Gh0stz0x (2018-02-12 15:29:28+00:00): Benvenuto in OpenStreetMap. 
Non si può prendere come riferimento Google Maps. Pertanto ti consiglio di fare un survey e inserire ciò che vedi. Non attingere da altre mappe dove non abbiamo autorizzazione esplicita, se nò vado di revert. 😁
dikkeknodel (2018-06-13 13:56:07+00:00): Hi Daniele,

I think you overdid your action a bit, since you also changed the Via Pianezza within the village of Bracchio to a path. On Esri imagery it is clearly visible that it's still a residential road there and at least a track for about 250 m into the forest. I think the previous v2 was accurate if you compare with the imagery. 

Could you please have a look at the Esri imagery and combined with your survey knowledge correct it?

Cheers,
dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 13:16:13+00:00): Hi Danielle,
I've made some changes in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60151022
If you ever get back online, feel free to chip into the discussion.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
DanieleOSM (2018-06-29 16:32:46+00:00): Dear dikkeknodel
I am sorry for the late reply, but I was in Vietnam for a few weeks and I had no access to a PC.
Your observation was correct, I had changed the attribut from track to path without noticing that at the beginning, as you write the first few hundred meters starting in Bracchio, were actually a road.
Thank you for noticing and thank you for the correction
Daniele :o)
dikkeknodel (2018-07-02 07:03:50+00:00): Hi Daniele,
Thanks for getting back. I was checking for hiking plans for my holiday I bumped into this mistake by coincidence. 
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
DanieleOSM (2018-07-02 07:56:14+00:00): I live in the area, so feel free to ask questions if you have any !
dikkeknodel (2018-07-02 08:04:22+00:00): Thank you for the offer, I was already there and it was great!
Sandal man (2018-06-24 13:23:59+00:00): Hello, why is this road tagged as i footway?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400932967 ?
alan_gr (2018-02-12 12:30:06+00:00): La descripción del cambio debería referirse a la línea 1 y no la línea 25.
Miroslav Suchý (2018-05-03 16:11:55+00:00): Ahoj, ten rozcestnik Lednice rybnik (jih) tam opravdu byl? Ja tam byl ted v utery a zadny takovy rozcestnik tam nebyl. Jenom ten na hrazi
NyanSten (2018-05-03 16:23:10+00:00): Ahoj, nevím, pouze jsem opravoval popisek rozcestníku. Nejdále jsem byl na hrázi.
opendcc (2018-02-12 13:43:47+00:00): Hallo,

ich verfolge da Eure Änderungen. Und ich bin der Meinung, primary ist richtig. Trunk bezeichnet autobahnähnliche (!) Bundesstraßen (also sowas wie z.B. die B15neu von Regensburg nach Landshut). Die B20 ist zwar gut ausgebaut, aber doch noch nicht autobahnähnlich.

Servus
Molker (2018-02-12 13:49:36+00:00): Hallo opendcc, ich erwähnte den Link zum Verständnis. In Deutschland sind Trunks: "meist mehrspurig ausgebaut und bieten dadurch eine anhaltefreie Fahrt.".

Dies ist hier der Fall. Es geht dabei nicht um ausschließlich mehrspurige Straßen. Ansonsten ist die Straße natürlich autobahnähnlich ausgebaut, es sind eben nur je eine Fahrspur pro Richtung.
opendcc (2018-02-12 18:23:45+00:00): Ich zitiere das Wiki: highway=trunk bezeichnet eine autobahnähnliche Schnellstraße .. Eine Schnellstraße wird ähnlich kartiert wie eine Autobahn. Auch empfiehlt das wiki 'Ausfahrt'-Schilder als Entscheidungskriterium heranzuziehen. Und Einfahrten in Forstwege passen auch nicht zu 'autobahnähnlich'.
firefoxinspace (2018-02-13 16:48:12+00:00): Hallo zusammen,
für eine Trunk Road ist erforderlich, dass die Richtungsfahrwege getrennt sind, d.h. entweder baulich (getarnte Autobahn) oder mittels durchgezogener Linie. Dafür hat sich die Community mehrheitlich ausgesprochen. Eine gestrichelte Linie reicht dafür nicht aus, denn Überholen im Gegenverkehr hat nichts mit autobahnähnlicher Fahrt zu tun, obwohl die Anschlussstellen mit Beschleunigungsstreifen versehen sind.
opendcc (2018-02-13 17:27:42+00:00): Hallo firefoxinspace, laß Dich vom Luftbild nicht täuschen: die Straße wurde 2017 abschnittsweise 3-spurig ausgebaut. Ist halt so an der Schelle zu trunk.
opendcc (2018-02-13 20:31:57+00:00): Hier gibt es ein Video von der Strecke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsaTKgUxuqI
firefoxinspace (2018-02-14 11:16:46+00:00): Ich danke für den Hinweis und bedaure die herbeigeführten Umstände!
JJIglesias (2018-02-12 17:47:30+00:00): Thanks the correction;the Tag should has been is_in:state=Chuquisaca
BsRgds
JJ
YraFyra (2018-02-13 08:20:50+00:00): Hej
Stämmer det att Bengts fik ligger i Skurup?
Владимир К (2018-08-08 07:05:48+00:00): Добрый день!
Я увидел, что вы ставите в тег height высоту с запятоой в качестве десятичного разделителя. Это неверно, в осм нужно использовать точку. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:height
kiri-klg (2018-08-08 07:14:27+00:00): учту, спасибо
trigpoint (2018-02-12 18:44:36+00:00): Hi, this does not fit the wiki description of a living street. It is, as previously tagged a residential street (what it looks like) that has bollards. It is legally a cycleway. 
Cheers Phil
user_5359 (2018-02-12 17:54:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:17:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
Akkurator (2018-05-11 11:28:55+00:00): Offensichtlich private Pools sollten mit access=private getaggt werden. Ich war so frei, das gleich zu erledigen für ways 560713551|2|3.
cbosse (2018-05-13 21:56:21+00:00): Alles klar, ich werde darauf achten! Vielen Dank!
user_5359 (2018-02-12 17:51:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
Hjart (2018-04-03 08:41:46+00:00): Are you sure there's a camp site here?
user_5359 (2018-02-12 17:50:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
lakedistrict (2018-02-12 18:42:04+00:00): Hi Charlotte, welcome to OSM. Thanks for your edits, they look good to me. It may take a few days for the changes you made to show up on all zoom levels. :-)
eggie (2018-02-12 13:59:51+00:00): Ron, Je hebt de naam verwijderd, maar shop = pet staat er nog op.