piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2020-02-24 23:30:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SHARCRASH (2020-06-02 10:26:47+00:00): Hello! Please do not confuse type of ways: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776092479/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776092480/history#map=18/49.60267/6.30302
Thanks for your comprehension

Check OSM's Wiki.
DaveF (2020-02-25 16:10:47+00:00): Hi
Could double check this please:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1277566#map=14/51.4982/-2.5902
ndm (2020-02-25 22:33:21+00:00): Double-checked -- it was broken before I editted it.
DaveF (2020-02-25 22:39:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463238230

You added tags to the way:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/463238230
ndm (2020-02-26 00:17:17+00:00): Hopefully removed now.

Didn't get any validation issues, except for some complaints about "incomplete" relation -- same as previous version had.
Matthew Darwin (2020-02-27 19:21:25+00:00): Hi Danny,

Re: Terraceier Circle

The City of Ottawa data I have from the open data portal calls this street "Terrier" not "Terraceier".  

Of course the city is probably not being consistent, so I would like to know where exactly you got your information from so then I can send a complaint that Open Data portal doesn't match this.

Thanks
DannyMcD (2020-02-27 21:08:02+00:00): This is my mistake, thanks.

By the way, I've been very impressed and happy with your editing activity in the past few months.  Keep up the good work!
DannyMcD (2020-02-27 21:22:02+00:00): In the past few months (except for today), you've realized that OSM is not a good use of your time.  There are a lot of projects that are much better suited to someone with your skills than OSM, and you've acted accordingly, and stopped editing.  This is the right decision, and I've glad you made it.
Matthew Darwin (2020-02-28 14:17:41+00:00): Hi Danny,

Yes I've been busy with a few things over the last few months, so no time for editing. My plan for OSM work going forward is to focus more on quality assurance for all of Canada rather than just Ottawa.

The real reason for no edits for Ottawa much is also because City of Ottawa had not posted updates for proposed roads and addresses in a while... now they've fixed that.  There are a few things to catch up on... but if someone else does that before I get to it, then that's totally fine by me.

Yesterday I had to fix my programs to account for the new city data, so then I had to test that it was working.  Naturally when you start editing OSM, then you get very into it and end up editing "just one more thing".
voschix (2020-04-18 10:18:20+00:00): It seems that this route has no signposting on the ground, Hence it should not be represented in OSM as a hiking route relation.
gabriele_sani (2020-04-18 10:26:21+00:00): At which relation are you referring to? Via Matildica del Volto Santo? It's an official hiking route (as you can see here http://www.viamatildica.it/), so why not mapping it? Moreover (correct me if I'm wrong) it's mandatory to have signpost to consider it an official relation?
voschix (2020-04-18 10:50:06+00:00): Hiking route as OSM relation require signposting on the ground. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes
(first sentence)
gabriele_sani (2020-04-18 10:58:06+00:00): The first sentence states "named *or* numbered *or otherwise* signed routes".
From my understanding only on of these three must be true (and the same phrase is used in the hiking page which I usually refer to: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking)

Morover a type of signal seems to exists as in this picture: 
https://gazzettadireggio.gelocal.it/image/contentid/policy:1.33259283:1559349462/image.jpg
voschix (2020-04-18 12:55:10+00:00): If you entered the relation, you should know if there is some kind of signing along the route.
gabriele_sani (2020-04-18 13:02:48+00:00): I used as a base an existing relation, expanded and completed it. Moreover, since signing is not mandatory, I didn't look too much for it.
user_5359 (2020-02-25 06:48:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your change set comment is totaly wrong and you overpainting existing building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370711277). See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81428265
gus mateos (2020-02-25 01:30:19+00:00): el relevamiento de luminarias fué realizado por el centro vecinal de villa los altos, la lucinda y Rio Ceballos Norte utilizando gps garmin
viloan (2020-02-25 01:02:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Hb- (2020-03-15 13:57:10+00:00): The Acacia Creek has several side streams. So this deletions were partly reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82218026
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 17:28:51+00:00): Olá,

aa restrições de conversão 10749428, 10749429 e 10749430 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Supaplex (2020-03-14 14:07:19+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Happy Mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81428359
user_5359 (2020-02-25 06:26:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved an address node https://www.osm.org/node/3581488804 over 100 meters, please check this. If you need help You are welcome.
viloan (2020-02-25 02:07:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-05-21 21:37:34+00:00): aqui tbm a via foi desalinhada, a camada maxar esta correta.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-05-22 15:58:12+00:00): aqui nesta nota voce tbm desalihou a rodovia link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2201529
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-08-11 20:04:18+00:00): Eduardo, aqui voce desalinou a via com a camada de satelite, por favor alinhe com a camada maxar novamente.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-08-11 20:04:42+00:00): principalmente por aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2843463430
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-08-11 20:05:03+00:00): e aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3409492526
user_5359 (2020-02-25 06:23:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mbethke (2020-03-02 14:18:38+00:00): Is all of Mahosot closed or just this one building?
daRamses (2020-03-02 17:57:46+00:00): No, just the parts south east like the international clinic. They are building a new Hospital on these grounds.
Warin61 (2020-02-26 06:50:00+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

The relationship you added for 15 Golden Wattle Street is incorrect. Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments. 
I think the rear square is a separate building, possibly a simple roof over a deck? In any event I have tagged the main building as the house and the smaller square as a simple building=yes.
Hope that helps.
Betanyahoo (2020-12-10 17:57:25+00:00): Better trace buildings manually ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776112945/history
viloan (2020-02-25 03:09:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 17:44:02+00:00): Olá,

aa restrições de conversão 10749516, 10749517, 10749518, 10749519, 10749520, 10749521, 10749523, 10749524, 10749525 e 10749526 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
szydzio (2020-02-25 10:27:28+00:00): Hej olo! Ale z tego co widać na streetview te perony raczej są covered=yes, więc usuwanie tagu z bazy nie jest wyjściem. Całkiem też możliwe, że niedługo powróci renderowanie takich peronów, patrz => https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4008 i wtedy będzie trzeba przywracać skasowane tagi. Alternatywnym podejściem byłoby zastosowanie covered=partially jeśli zadaszenie nie pokrywa całkowicie peronu lub zmapowanie zadaszenia jako building=roof => https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3162#issuecomment-396412904
olo81 (2020-02-25 12:42:49+00:00): Bardziej dla testu to zrobiłem z jednym peronem. A  jednak podziałało. Można dalej coś myśleć.
olo81 (2020-02-25 14:38:50+00:00): Chyba nie ma dobrego wyjścia, zadaszenie pokrywa cały peron, jak się da building=roof nie będzie go widać. 
covered=prtially przetestuje ale wątpie by pomogło.
szydzio (2020-02-25 14:40:32+00:00): No to może covered=roof, zasugerował to sam kocio na forum => https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=778466#p778466
olo81 (2020-02-25 15:24:57+00:00): dałem jeden roof drugi partially zobaczymy co z tego wyjdzie
Glassman (2020-02-25 06:39:43+00:00): The fairway doesn't match the imagery. Can you fix it?
Adamant1 (2020-02-26 11:44:13+00:00): Hey, I got rid of the name=West Redding tag. As again, the name tag isn't suppose to be used a descriptor. Plus, it's not really accurate anyway. A lot of things could be considered "west Redding" and what is or isn't is rather arbitrary. Which is I never tagged the area like that when  I was mapping it. Same goes for similar things like "old town", "downtown", "Mt. Shasta Mall Area", "Enterprise Area", and other unofficial or not actually existing "divisional areas" of town. Otherwise, it's leads to the whole arbitrary mapping and edit warring thing I was telling you about. There's a ton of none official ways the city could be divided up into, but it's better just not to open that can of worms, or if we do, it should at least be discussed and planned first.  At some point I plan to create a Wiki page for Shasta County. Things like that and any future imports could probably be planned and coordinated there first. That's how OSM usually prefers it.
Adamant1 (2020-02-26 11:44:25+00:00): Btw, I've noticed that you have mostly been doing mapping of other things besides sidewalks since you did the import. While I can understand doing cleanup probably isn't high on your priority list, one of the requirements of imports is that you fix any errors in them after doing it. In this case, it's particularly important sidewalks are mapped correctly because  they play an important role in navigation and a lot of them are messed up now. For instance, a lot are navigation islands that cant be routed through, especially in neighborhoods. Which should really be fixed by connecting them to the road network at crossings. There's also a lot of little sidewalk "stubs" around that should be deleted and sidewalks that where imported over already existing ones. So, I'd appreciate if you spent some time dealing with those things and cleaning up any other problems that might have been caused by the import.

Thanks
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2020-02-26 16:40:35+00:00): Alright. I might disagree with you about "Downtown" as there is an official area, but otherwise that makes sense. Maybe some subdivisions like Vin Knolls which have a single collector road.

As for the sidewalks, I'm in the process of reverting my changesets. The data is iffy and probably not worth the work.
azakh-world (2020-02-27 11:14:55+00:00): Hello.
You've delete a station node and created an area. Please, check if the re-created object is included into relations and include the new object instead of the old one, otherwise relations get broken.

Best regards,
Alexey
user_5359 (2020-02-25 06:16:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
Aglis IRM-ED (2023-01-12 03:39:40+00:00): Hi,  Russ McD.

Thank you for mapping contribution! Currently, I'm doing remote mapping to validate the existing rail network in Thailand.

I need your help, especially with this railway (15.6374197, 102.4706175). I saw in the Changeset history, you added tag "layer=-1" to this railway
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/776134930).
Did you know that the railroad tracks are on a different layer than the surrounding roads? or is there any other information that you can explain?

I really appreciate any information you provide.
Thank you
Russ McD (2023-01-12 05:01:01+00:00): If you check, you will see the original line was put in as layer=-1
I suspect this was a mistake and when I added bridges or split the line for any other reason, I become the new creator of that section.  Perhaps you don't fully understand this as Map roulette is more of a game which looks at random "bad edits".
I see you have changed it, which looks correct, but hope you will now look at the entire railway and check it all for the correct layer tag. 
Rgds Russ.
Iko IRM-RV (2023-01-12 08:28:56+00:00): Russ, I just realized that if mappers split a stretch of highway, it will be automatically created as first person in history. Do you have any experience or ideas on how we can locate the original segment? so we can consult the mapper
Russ McD (2023-01-12 15:14:58+00:00): Not really, other than examining all segments and look for the earliest date.
user_5359 (2020-02-25 06:14:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Adamant1 (2020-02-27 12:20:24+00:00): Just a minor tip, but you don't usually want to map ways as mock closed areas like your doing with access aisles. A more proper way to do it is to just map it as a single line connected to whatever footpath or driveway it is connected to. Thanks.
Tyler Brown Cifu Shuster (2020-02-27 18:26:54+00:00): That makes sense. I'll do that
aweech (2020-02-25 15:08:34+00:00): Hi,
Why did you decide to delete these driveways? As far as I can tell, the houses are still there, and the driveways are still there.
chepteja (2020-02-26 10:13:12+00:00): Hi,
Apologies for the incorrect edit. While I was assigning the road attribute to the road, I've accidentally deleted them. I shall take this as a learning and consider avoid such errors in future edits. To correct the same, I've added the driveways under changeset #81496886
Regards,
chepteja
freebeer (2020-02-27 09:02:57+00:00): hallo chepteja and the rest of the amazon team,

this is just general info about how OSM likes to handle old data and accidental deletions like this.

while you have added the driveways deleted, this was very simply done by drawing them from nothing, so that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81496886 there are links to three ways, but none of them, at v1, will have the original history and credit to the original mapper that can be seen only by following the links below to the deleted way, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756751719/history .

there are tools available that can restore accidentally deleted ways, preserving the history and linking all previous edits.

i know amazon has reported they are planning to migrate editing tools due to deficiencies in the iD editor when deployed on such a large scale; JOSM is often suggested as it has the ability to selectively revert parts of an accidental changeset as this.  alternatively, other mappers have access to script tools that can do the same thing, and are willing to apply them in cases like this, as i've just done in a repeat case of deliberate vandalism.

we appreciate you adding back what you deleted, and do want you to know there is a `better' way to do it, that again is a tradeoff between an advanced mapper skill, and what can be expected from entry-level or limited mappers.

thanks
Polarbear (2020-02-26 22:56:03+00:00): Hallo Geozeisig,
du hast hier die Geometrie der Rodungsfläche deiner Baustellenzeichnung aus CS 81410606 angepasst, insofern auch hier die Farge nach der Quelle der Geometrie.
geozeisig (2020-02-27 07:13:54+00:00): Ich habe es mir vor Ort angesehen so weit das möglich war. Der Wald ist teilweise gesperrt wie es auch korrekt mit access=no richtig getaggt wurde. Man kann also am Rand der Baustelle nicht mehr herumgehen. Aber von der L38 hat man einen guten Einblick.
Gruß
Polarbear (2020-02-27 13:08:27+00:00): Danke für die Klärung. Den GPS-Source-tag hatte schon jemand entfernt, ich entnehme deinen Worten, dass er sich ohnehin nur auf die L38 bezog. 
Sinnvoll ist in solchen Fällen, bei der Quelle anzugeben, von welchem Standpunkt aus man Geometrien geschätzt hat, ich habe das hier mal eingetragen ("estimation from L38 perspective"), und dass du vor Ort warst.
seattlefyi (2020-02-25 16:14:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating the business location. Do you happen to know if the building is now gone? In addition to the business tags being removed, the address has been removed, though perhaps it should still be there for the next tenant.
geodependent (2020-02-25 17:07:49+00:00): Yes the address should have remained, as only the business location has changed. My mistake. I went ahead and added it back. Thanks!
seattlefyi (2020-02-26 15:55:41+00:00): No problem, it's just a small detail. Thanks for fixing it, and for all of your other edits!
user_5359 (2020-02-25 18:17:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-25 12:12:15+00:00): Hi Prasad ECL, 

I guess something went wrong here?
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776152771

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-26 18:15:09+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81479450