piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BikePC (2021-08-14 12:45:41+00:00): De waarde 'portage' voelt als dat je de kano hier moet dragen. En dat kan daar juist niet. Dat je dat dan ergens anders moet doen, lijkt niet zo logisch. Vandaar mijn misinterpretatie. Dank voor je uitleg (geldt ook voor de opm. bij Inlaatwerk Limietsloot).
ivanbranco (2021-08-14 09:00:40+00:00): Hi Arlo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1884613080

what's the meaning of the zip4=4046 tag?
Arlo James Barnes (2021-08-18 12:52:03+00:00): the postal code tag seems (in the US) designed for the main five-digit ZIP; I wanted to put the +4 elsewhere for safekeeping.

do you have software that tells you about new rare key uses?
eggie (2021-08-13 06:33:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_4084608 (2021-08-13 08:26:51+00:00): Dank je. Ik zal het lezen.
redd (2025-12-02 23:32:48+00:00): Hallo Axelboldt,
Du hast bei der Roten Kapelle die 1 Uhr zu 13:00 Uhr geändert statt 01:00 Uhr.

Umso interessanter, dass das 4 Jahr niemanden aufgefallen ist bei einem durchaus populärem Lokal mitten in Stuttgart.

Grüße,

Redd
iWowik (2021-08-13 09:22:44+00:00): Опять зравствуйте!
Вы попрежнему не соблюдаете правила наименования улиц и домов.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972688208

Я об этом уже вам писал
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109538045

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
tekim (2021-08-19 00:14:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits!  It would be very helpful if you could add a more descriptive changeset comment rather than "Not Reported", for reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Mike
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109596573
ASchon (2021-08-19 16:17:00+00:00): if i remember correctly this change was just adding a couple shops to the map. in the future i'll describe my changes in the comments.
tekim (2021-08-19 19:13:15+00:00): Thanks for the reply and for agreeing to add more descriptive changeset comments, it will make OSM even better.

BTW, good to hear that Komito Boots is still there. Steve Komito is a great guy and one needs climbing shoes resoled, he is the one to see!
bbmiller (2021-08-13 15:18:42+00:00): Hey, not sure if you're still working on this area, but it looks like one of the ways you created didn't get any tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972696828/history
EotS (2021-08-13 20:58:47+00:00): Thanks, working on it.
mueschel (2021-08-13 16:28:56+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits. There are many ways without any valid tag which are not part of any relation.
EotS (2021-08-14 00:40:19+00:00): Got it mostly cleaned up, thanks for the feedback.  Still working on it...let me know what else you see.
mueschel (2021-08-20 08:00:34+00:00): Hi,
thanks for checking this. There are still 8 multi-polygons with these tags:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1atF

It also looks like the relation, the 'outer' and 'inner' ways on some of them share all the same tags. An 'inner' way typically shouldn't have any tags at all.
ivanbranco (2021-08-14 09:02:53+00:00): Hi EotS,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972701283

you added a lot of elements with strange tags, is this an import?
EotS (2021-08-14 14:48:34+00:00): Yes, imported from MI DNR shapefiles.  Getting them cleaned up.  Thanks for the feedback.
ivanbranco (2021-09-19 08:47:15+00:00): A month passed since this (undocumented?) import and nothing got cleaned up, maybe it should be reverted?
EotS (2021-09-20 18:30:27+00:00): You want to revert an entire section of state forest that was completely lacking on OSM for a few extra tags?  What do a few extra tags mean to OSM users looking at the forest boundaries?

I'll see if I can get them cleaned up for you.
ivanbranco (2021-09-20 20:27:23+00:00): It's not about getting them cleaned "for me", there are guidelines to be followed while importing data: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Did your read it?
mueschel (2021-08-18 15:17:00+00:00): Hi,
you used many recycling tags here that are not used in other places. Could you check the wiki for the correct tags?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

All keys should use the common, English terms.

Thanks!
baumann3141 (2021-08-13 15:41:49+00:00): Please check (e.g. addresses of businesses along these ways), I think both legs should be named "East Saginaw Street".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109598734
Sam Wilson (2021-09-05 23:01:09+00:00): @Mictlantechupi: thanks for working on improving the map of Rottnest!

It looks like you've marked lots of "defensive earthworks" in this edit, but most of these are actually water tanks. You can see them at the right side of this photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wallace_Island,_Rottnest.jpg  There are some bunkers, but not many (e.g. there's one about due south from the western-most observation post in Bickley).

Do you mind if I switch these to man_made=storage_tank + content=water + ruins=yes?
abakus_uploader (2021-08-13 22:33:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
julcnx (2021-08-13 08:02:43+00:00): - wrong classification: the main purpose of the roads seems to be access to agricultural fields (track). definitely not residential.
- lack of road split: straight section should be separated from building driveway
- do not curve corners at visible junctions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109599338
OZ_A1 (2021-08-13 02:40:00+00:00): My apologies, in an attempt to install a line section of double track, it seems I have inadvertently removed the wye junction which connects the Julago Cattle sidings with the main line adjacent to the Bruce Hwy overpass near Stuart.

I am sorry for this interference of the original data.  
I hope that mistake can be undone and if need be, you can delete my entire double-track edit between Stuart and Nome(QLD).

As a first-time editor of OpenStreetMap, I am unsure if I can delete my submitted edits.
Again, my apologies.
nevw (2021-08-14 05:52:15+00:00): Hi OZ_A1
I am not familiar with the area but can see no deleted parts using archavi
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109599405
Maybe the map tiles took some time to update to reflect your changes and they do update at different times depending on the zoom level.
I notice parts of your line are tagged railway=disused. The main line seems ok to me and the disused line appears as a faint dotted line on the standard osm layer. The Transport Map layer takes longer to be re-rendered, maybe a week?
If you still think it is all amiss, I can revert you changeset edit, but it looks fine to me.
OZ_A1 (2021-08-17 00:02:19+00:00): nevw,
Thank you very much for your speedy reply.
My error was tagging the additional track I added as 'disused' - when it is infact 'active'. I have just made a further edit to change this 'disused' section of track to 'active'/'train track'. Hopefully those changes should take effect soon and the correction can be seen.
If I have been unsuccessful in making these changes, I will return here in a week's time to ask for assistance to revert/delete my original changeset edit.
Thanks again.
nevw (2021-08-17 06:14:26+00:00): Hi
there is another section tagged as disused still and I expect you also need the tag railway=rail on the bridge section too.
Cheers
OZ_A1 (2021-08-22 03:05:16+00:00): Hi nevw.
Thank you for another prompt reply. I believe I have now successfully made the changes you pointed out, so hopefully with that, the issues are now resolved. 
Fingers crossed this time.
julcnx (2021-08-13 08:13:54+00:00): Correct classification: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109612920
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109599773
Warin61 (2023-01-24 04:44:00+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM. 

The 'Gogeldrie Fire Brigade' tagged 'building=yes' .. well that implies that all the site is a building. I have fixed this and changed the name to 'Gogeldrie Rural Fire Brigade'.

Keep mapping!
SGorskiy (2021-08-13 03:21:04+00:00): o_O
rain_99 (2021-08-13 08:21:17+00:00): был напуган))
DENelson83 (2021-08-18 06:50:07+00:00): Looks like you broke the relation for Pacific Rim National Park Reserve Broken Group Islands Unit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2017388
lizzyd710 (2021-08-18 17:24:38+00:00): How so? I'm happy to go back and fix it.
DENelson83 (2021-08-18 17:34:47+00:00): Take a look at the inner ring of that relation on Effingham Island.
PT-53 (2021-08-15 12:04:50+00:00): Hallo Natenom,
Du hast an diesen Straßenabschnitten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79638113/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30169380/history
das Merkmal
oneway=ergänzt.
Müßten diese Straßenabschnitte
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35877898/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30169381/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893971528/history
dann nicht auch eine Einbahnstraße sein ?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
user_2027279 (2021-08-17 16:32:37+00:00): Hallo. Danke für den Hinweis.

Ich war gestern noch einmal vor Ort, um sicher zu gehen. Es gibt nur eine Beschilderung "Einfahrt verboten" an der Nordseite, aber keine "Einbahnstraße" an der Südseite. Habe oneway=yes an beiden Stellen entfernt.
PT-53 (2021-08-18 06:32:44+00:00): Hallo Natenom, 
danke für Deine Rückmeldung.

Das Einfahren von der Wartbergallee wird bereits durch diese beiden Abbiegebeschränkungen
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8147005/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8147006/history
verhindert.
Zusätzlich gibt es noch dieses Einfahrverbot
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12164369
das ich (weger der o.g. TRs)  für unnötig und zudem für falsch halte (falsches From-Mitglied).

Dieser Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144194448/history
hat noch ein Oneway-Merkmal. Das dürfte wohl auch falsch sein.

Grüße
BubbaJuice (2021-08-14 00:19:39+00:00): Hi they,

Here was the brief discussion I had about this on one of the changesets that changed the tags. There was also discussion about it in #local-arizona in the OSM US Slack. (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CF9G71Y4B/p1615931124000900)
BubbaJuice (2021-08-14 00:20:08+00:00): Didn't link the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99411849
txemt (2021-09-03 01:25:11+00:00): It looks like you have removed functional classification from Tucson. I could be wrong, but almost all of the streets line up with AZDOT's FC map, except the ones that bumped down from primary.
they (2021-09-03 16:21:51+00:00): OSM does not use the federal functional highway classification standards (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Tags#Road_classifications).  "Urban Arterials" were traditionally mapped as secondary, unless they extend outside the city to connect to nearby towns, or are obviously a better option than the rest of the arterial road network to get across the metropolitan area.  This edit restores Tucson to that standard, until a road classification standard is developed for Arizona.  Please see the #local-arizona channel in the OSMUS slack for more discussion about this.
txemt (2021-09-03 17:10:35+00:00): Trust me, I’ve been involved in this discussion. I’ve seen the Arizona channel in Slack as well. I was merely pointing out the almost surgically precise way it was done. Another user had inquired why a certain road he thought should be primary, wasn’t primary. He and I had a discussion about all of that, including FC. I also told him to join the AZ slack and to discuss his concerns there.
DannyES (2021-09-04 01:24:42+00:00): Hello! i'm the user he's talking about. my inquiry was after looking at the Tucson map for AADT(average annual daily traffic). Roads like Broadway, Speedway, Grant, Craycroft; They all have an AADT of over 20,000, some almost 40,000. imo, anything 20,000-40,000 is Primary, with Limited Intersection roads(Golf Links, Aviation parkway) being trunk roads. Now i'd say 8,000 - 20,000 is secondary with under 8,000 is tertiary and lower. i will link the website for you below for you to look at. I just started OSMing and as a native Tucsonan, These changes don't look good. They put streets with an AADT of less than 7,000 in the same category of streets with an AADT of 35,000. Here are the streets to bump up:
Broadway - Downtown to Camino Seco;
Speedway - Silverbell to Camino Seco;
22nd - I-10 to Camino Seco;
Grant/Kolb - Silverbell/Grant to Kolb/Valencia;
Valencia - Mark Road to Kolb Road;
Irvington - I-19 to Tucson Boulevard;
Ajo - Kinney to Palo Verde;
Golf Links - Craycroft to Harrison;
Campbell/Kino - Irvington to River;

There are more to bump up, but these roads all have AADT's over 20,000 and thus should be primary roads in my opinion

LINK - https://pag.public.ms2soft.com/tcds/
they (2021-09-13 17:40:48+00:00): DannyES, thank you for sharing that link!  I assume you have seen the discussion about this on Slack.  Your proposal mostly aligns with the current one there.
DannyES (2021-09-13 18:10:08+00:00): Yeah, Me and BubbaJuice came up with a proposal i will put below:
Ina/Skyline/Sunrise: I-10 - Craycroft
Thornydale/River/Alvernon Way: Magee Road - Alvernon Trunk Section and I-10 to Valencia Road
Broadway Boulevard: Congress Street to Houghton Road
Grant/Kolb Road: Silverbell Road - Valencia Road
Valencia Road: Camino Verde - Kolb Road
Houghton Road: I-10 - Golf Links Road
Ajo Way/AZ 86: Alvernon Way - AZ 85 Junction
22nd Street: I-10 to Camino Seco
Pantano Road: Speedway Boulevard - 22nd Street
Golf Links Road: Extend Trunk to Kolb Road and Primary Road from Kolb Road - Houghton Road
Craycroft Road: Sunrise Drive - Golf Links Road
Swan Road: Sunrise Drive - Golf Links Road
Speedway Boulevard: I-10 - Camino Seco
Campbell Avenue/Kino Parkway: River Road - Valencia Road
Oracle Road: Grant Road - Miracle Mile
Wilmot/Tanque Verde Road: Catalina Highway - Golf Links Road
Prince Road: Oracle Road - I-10
Cortaro Road: Thornydale Road - Silverbell Road
La Canada Drive/Flowing Wells Road: Tangerine Road - Miracle Mile
Fort Lowell Road: Swan Road - Oracle Road
Orange Grove Road: Oracle - I-10
Wetmore/Ruthrauff Road: Oracle - I-10
La Cholla Boulevard: Ruthrauff - Magee Road
1st Avenue: Broadway Boulevard - Grant Road
Euclid Avenue from Grant Road to Broadway Boulevard
St Marys Road/6th Street: Silverbell Road - Euclid Avenue
Congress Street/Toole Avenue: from Broadway Boulevard to I-10
6th Avenue/Nogales Highway: I-10 - Los Reales Road
Thank You!
DannyES (2021-09-13 18:22:08+00:00): I based my list off of roads that had a traffic volume of 20,000, as roads should be based on how people drive, not how they were meant to be used. 

Take Tangerine road, it's getting widened to 4 lanes for I-10 purposes, but Marana residents will just use the exits in Marana to enter the I-10 and Tangerine west of 1st/Rancho Vistoso really only serves residents needing to go to Phoenix/I-10, which isn't everyone.
Viajero Perdido (2021-11-07 02:28:29+00:00): Hi. Any reason for deleting aerialway=proposed? Glitch?
Oilerator (2021-11-07 05:06:41+00:00): No idea, I don't remember deleting that. Maybe I did on accident
Viajero Perdido (2021-11-07 05:11:50+00:00): No biggie. I can put it back. It's not like any maps actually render it... until it's built. :)
tekim (2021-08-19 00:11:22+00:00): Hi, Thanks for the edits.  In the future, please restrict each changeset to a reasonably sized geographic area.  This changeset spans a large part of the US making it difficult to review.
abvincen (2021-10-26 11:31:11+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue.
I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
abvincen
DP24PH (2021-08-13 05:44:17+00:00): NOTICE TO MAPPERS | 매퍼에 대한 공지
This changeset fixes the recent Han River render issues on OpenStreetMap, and further discussions are welcome here. | 이 변경 세트는 OpenStreetMap의 최근 한강 렌더링 문제를 수정하며 추가 토론은 여기에서 환영합니다.

DP24
user_12858253 (2021-08-28 13:26:47+00:00): 972747599 is NOT a building (local knowledge). Please delete it. Thanks.
user_12858253 (2021-08-28 13:27:47+00:00): The special surface makes it look like a building.
MontaltoAlps (2021-08-30 23:25:54+00:00): Hi greece1821, Thank you for catching this and letting me know! I’ve gone ahead and removed this building feature over the black square surface. While investigating this, I also noticed some split buildings should also be merged into one, which I’ve now updated while maintaining your building level tags. Thank you for sharing your local knowledge!
Wulf4096 (2021-08-13 06:26:10+00:00): Hab das mal rückgängig gemacht.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dshelter
SGorskiy (2021-08-13 07:23:12+00:00): Теги норм.
mueschel (2021-08-20 08:40:54+00:00): Hi,
'campers' and 'rv' are no well-defined terms in OSM. Did you mean caravans and motorhomes?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972754455
SekeRob (2021-08-20 08:56:14+00:00): The painted word is Camper, so guess motorhomes and caravans. I've mapped more or 
 less half a dozen of these in the region think all along the autostrade fuel stations. It's a popular tag per taginfo, capacity:motorhome, 34, caravan, 270, caravans, 100, so guess those are the canonical, the singular that is.

ciao

PS feel free to make the amendment.
SekeRob (2021-08-20 12:26:29+00:00): OK Went ahead and replaced tags for motorhome and caravan and added total capacity tag... 1, not much room for both at the same time. On reflection, think to remember the others just had a sanitary dump point but no special parking.

cheers
iWowik (2021-08-13 09:25:55+00:00): Опять зраствуйте!

Вы попрежнему продолжаете нарушать правила наименования улиц, я про это уже вам писал
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109549119

Исправьте, пожалуйста.
Aetiusjp (2021-08-13 06:22:31+00:00): Review gevraagd: Ik heb de officiële Ede kaarten gebruikt om de soorten bomen in het park te achterhalen. Is dit oke? Ik zag op de Discord dat sommige kaarten vanwege copyright niet bruikbaar zijn.
Cartographer10 (2021-08-13 14:12:59+00:00): Hey,

Lastig. Heb even gekeken maar kan helemaal niets vinden over de copyright op hun website. Ik zie wel dat sommige kaarten achter een login zitten en sommige niet. Daarnaast heb ik eens geodata van ede op een ander portaal opgezocht en daar staat het zonder licentie dus vrij te gebruiken. Maar goed, echt duidelijk zijn ze niet. 

Mocht je het echt zeker willen weten dan kun je altijd de gemeente even mailen met de vraag.

Groeten,
Vincent

P.s. Ik neem aan dat je OSM world discord server bedoelt? Je kunt ook daar in het Nederlandse sub-kanaal je vraag stellen. Daar ben ik ook actief.
Aetiusjp (2021-08-13 19:06:43+00:00): Bedankt voor het advies Vincent.
Ik laat de edit voor nu, maar ik heb dezelfde vraag gemaild naar de gemeente. Hopelijk horen we volgende week weer!

Ja. Ik heb de afgelopen maand wat lurking in de NL Discord, maar nederlands is niet mijn eerste taal. Ik voel me raar om daar te proberen te posten. Het kost me veel tijd om berichten te schrijven... :p
Cartographer10 (2021-08-14 07:52:24+00:00): Ah, goed dat je de gemeente even hebt gemaild. Laat maar weten. Ben ook benieuwd. Ik zag dat sommige basiskaarten van hun OSM waren dus ik verwacht dat ze er niet al te moeilijk om doen.

Over Discord. Ah zo. Je mag het ook altijd in het engels vragen hoor. Je kunt het anders ook in een ander kanaal vragen aangezien die altijd engels zijn en wss ziet een van ons het dan wel (bijvoorbeeld "mapping-help"). Maar goed, ik wil je natuurlijk niet dwingen. 

Groeten,
Vincent
Aetiusjp (2021-08-18 07:28:43+00:00): Hoi Vincent, 
Ik heb iets terug gehoord van de gemeente. 

Volgens de Adviseur Geo-informatie Kwaliteit en Informatiemanagers zijn er geen problemen met het gebruik van de gemeente databases voor OSM.
Ze doen er niet al te moeilijk over. :)

mvg,
Aet
Cartographer10 (2021-08-18 07:35:08+00:00): Ah, top. Bedankt voor de terugkoppeling. Ik zag dat enkele basiskaarten van hun ook OSM zijn dus verwachte al dat ze niet heel moeilijk deden. 

Wettelijk gezien moeten gemeente en andere overheidsorganen ook een hoop van hun dingen als open data aanbieden.
felipeeugenio (2021-08-13 12:25:46+00:00): Estimado
con la letra Q puede cuadrar las estructuras.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109607514
bitstacker (2021-08-13 12:04:11+00:00): hi. could you please revert your changes - the bing aerial imagery is outdated. there is now a parking garage with oneway entrance and exits. the streets you added dont exist anymore.
DianaDemchuk (2021-08-13 12:23:04+00:00): Hey! Thank you for your attentiveness and for responding quickly! Geometry fixed, (new chenset  109628248). Let's check the relevance of the pictures better!
Warin61 (2021-08-18 08:15:44+00:00): You have failed to respond to past attempts to have you correct your own errors and this changeset has yet more errors ... I wonder if you are getting the messages.. or you simply don't want to communicate?
dachshund347 (2021-08-13 07:08:18+00:00): Sorry, hier wurden diverse Ergänzungen zwischen Graal-Müritz und Ahrenshoop vorgenommen, nicht "Wege im Hohwald".  Wegeverläufe, neue Rad- Fuß- Wege, Tracks, Gebäude und deren Eigenschaften, etc.
Protoxenus (2022-03-26 16:11:17+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier einen kombinierten Rad- und Fußweg als "cycleway" umgetagged. In DE gibt es per Definition keine Radwege, auf denen Fußgänger geduldet sind. Es gibt Wege, auf denen Fußgänger uns Radfahrer gleichberechtigt sind (VZ 240/241), was hier zutrifft. 
Ich möchte dich bitten, so ein falsches Kartieren in Zukunft zu unterlassen.
Gruß Protoxenus
dachshund347 (2022-03-26 17:09:18+00:00): Danke für deinen Hinweis. Es kann immer mal zu Fehlern kommen. Das war nicht beabsichtigt und ich werde mich bemühen, solch falsches Karrieren in Zukunft zu unterlassen. Beste Grüße dachshund347
Protoxenus (2022-03-26 19:04:52+00:00): Na dann noch viel Spaß beim Kartieren.
Gruß Protoxenus
SafetyIng (2021-08-13 08:12:15+00:00): A road that access human settlement can not be "track" !!!!
girinj (2021-08-17 06:33:45+00:00): Hi Safetying, 

we have added service road + driveway in the past but some of the local community members recommended us to add road classification following the surrounding edits and parent road segment classification. As service is considered to be higher than track road, I considered this to be a track road. Please do suggest me if my interpretation is wrong. 

Regards 
girinj
SafetyIng (2021-08-17 09:17:00+00:00): Sorry, have I to teach you every time, how OSM works? And no, a stupid automatic reply is not helpful.

See in the wiki how highway=track is to use and when not. I have marked this at your edits multiple times.