piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ahtojää (2020-05-24 12:11:06+00:00): Hej! highway=cycleway är avsedd endast för banor som är markerade som cykelvägar (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway). Det räcker alltså inte att det går att cykla eller att folk gör så, utan highway=cycleway är en väg som är särskilt avsedd för cykling.
johantiden (2020-05-24 12:15:25+00:00): Håller helt med men nu finns ingen access alls kvar, även om de inte är avsedda för cyklar. Tänkte bara om det var slarvfel och att du egentligen hade tänkt highway=footway, bicycle=yes, segregated=no.
abakus_uploader (2020-05-20 22:31:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
jomox (2020-05-22 16:38:42+00:00): Hello Tomatze. Did you manually review all of these 89 nodes?

Otherwise, please revert this changeset. See the rules for Automated Edits: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits

I didn't double check all the changed nodes, but from your very brief description, you might have produced some issues. For example, "3,456" being corrected from >3k meters to ~3 meters.
Tomatze (2020-05-22 17:27:56+00:00): Hello jomox,
thanks for your feedback.
I did review all of them manually in the sense of making the edits by hand in the xml and not doing them automated with a sed or something.

Your totally right with your example regarding the >3k meters though. I should have checked the the altitude of that one and remove the comma entirely. I'm not sure if this special example worsened the data (is placing a dot instead of a comma worse, in a situation, where there should not be a comma or a dot in the first place?). If I recall correctly, this was the only peak which had a 3 diget number after the comma.
Would you still recommend to revert the changeset? As I said, I did the edits manually, but didn't look at every single peak on the map, to esimate, if its height is correct, by e.g. looking at nearby peaks.
aachso (2020-05-22 17:41:51+00:00): The 3456 was a made-up example, not something I actually found in your changeset (I didn't look). IMO it would be making it worse because it changes the data from something not parsable but correct (might be ignored in e.g. routing) to something parsable but wrong (might be regarded as a huge drop in elevation when routing).

Perhaps you can double check if there are any instances of 3 or more digits after the comma and verify these are correct?

Thanks
aachso (2020-05-22 17:46:19+00:00): To clarify my possibly confusing first sentence: I searched for "3.456" in your changeset, but didn't look for anything else, so I'm assuming this was a made-up example by @jomox of the numbers 3 4 5 6 ;)
Tomatze (2020-05-22 17:47:52+00:00): I just saw, that I misunderstood you. I thought you found the example in the changeset...
I remembered something like your example, because I originally edited arround 170 peaks (which would have been all peaks worldwide with a comma in the ele tag). But for some reason Josm just uploaded 89 of the 172? peaks I edited (it showed all changes from my changeset.osc but didn't upload all, maybe a bug in Josm).
I looked at all my changes again via OSM History and think there should be no case, in which I misintepreted the values / worsened the data.
the only node, where I removed the elevation data completely is this one:
768061367
It seemed to have redundant information, which did not belong to the ele tag.
jomox (2020-05-22 19:14:02+00:00): I now looked at the changeset XML (https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/85503507/download) and found no instances of a thousands separator or multiple dots/commas. So this edit looks fine to me.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-05-20 21:22:25+00:00): Hi Pitner,
Welcome back to OSM!
OSM defines parks as "an area of open space for recreational use" but you've got this park running over houses, farmland, Rice Lake and other features. Are you sure park is the best tag for this entire area?
Richard (2020-06-13 08:26:30+00:00): Hi - you appear to have turned this into a three-mile bridge which I'm guessing was not intentional ;)
eggie (2020-05-20 16:00:36+00:00): Dag Daniël.. Scholen zijn lastig .. amenity school staat al op het terrein. Een extra adres is niet nodig want er is al een adresnode aanwezig.
De naam kun je ook op het terrei zetten. Dat rendert beter,

MVG,
Eggie
~Jhellico (2020-05-22 17:39:24+00:00): Навіщо ділити Відрадний проспект на два веї? Плюс завищений статус і поламані зв’язки маршрутів ГТ!
andygol (2020-05-23 14:56:38+00:00): @~Jhellico  відкатуй взад цю самодєятельность.
~Jhellico (2020-05-23 15:20:32+00:00): Відкотив. Наче нічого не зламалось
ElliottPlack (2020-06-04 17:03:36+00:00): No, you haven't :) It is missing now. The creation of these bays as relation was done in coordination with the local and international OSM community. What was the problem that you'd hope to fix with these edits?
Sparks (2020-06-04 17:24:07+00:00): *sigh*
Okay, so originally this area was identified as the Miles River, which was incorrect.  I reduced the Miles River to a location that seemed appropriate (based on maritime charts) and then tried to break up the area into the separate bays using relations.  That seemed to fail pretty quickly.  So, trying to follow what I read as the way to map bays, did this...  and fail.

So, with all that in mind, this area is mainly the Eastern Bay with several smaller bays.  How should this be mapped?
ElliottPlack (2020-06-04 17:41:08+00:00): OK, thanks for the explainer here. If you hit a wall with this kind of complex thing (as I often do) feel free to reach out on the OSM US Slack Group.

The original goal here in the Eastern Chesapeake was to add the "eastern bay" as a big multipolygon, rather than a part of the coastline. The coastline, as you may know, is big, complex, and slow to update. We've been encouraged to remove big bays from the coastline to make it easier for mappers to see updates to the water as the rendering happens nearly instantly. I think it's fine to split off the smaller bays from the big eastern bay too. I think it was named Miles River when it should have been Eastern Bay.

Since you've already made a bunch of changes here I don't think we should try reverting this, rather let's just fix it. Want to take a crack at putting the bay features into multipolygons and then removing the coastline from all but the most outer ways?
ElliottPlack (2020-06-04 17:42:00+00:00): Wikipedia for Eastern Bay https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Bay
Sparks (2020-06-04 18:48:55+00:00): So, should this just be tagged as "natural=water"?
Sparks (2020-06-04 19:05:53+00:00): FWIW, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbay says that the bay should be enclosed by coastline, thus where I ended my edit several weeks ago.  Perhaps this page should be updated?

I've now created a relation for the Eastern Bay and tagged it as natural=bay, along with all the other identifiers.  I'll just wait to see if this renders appropriately or if I need to change it to "natural=water".
ElliottPlack (2020-06-12 14:46:07+00:00): Sorry for the delay. It looks like it still needs that natural=water tag to show up as water.

The way you had done it (as coastline) is not technically wrong. It was more of a local convention to "switch" these deep coastlines to water multipolygons. 

I'd consider adding natural=water and water=river, then naming it as Eastern Bay. It is a "river" in so far as upstream water eventually flows through it. But, since the bay is tidal, all of the rivers that are below the fall line could be considered coastline but they typically set to river.

Typically i'll add natural=bay as a point when the bay is somewhat indiscriminate.
Sparks (2020-06-12 15:02:06+00:00): Right now the relation is tagged as

type=multipolygon
natural=water
tidal=yes

I've been working on other bodies of waters in North Carolina that seem to be rendering properly.  Not sure why this is failing so badly.  Maybe those will start failing too?
ElliottPlack (2020-06-12 15:14:33+00:00): That's the right way. It could be a missing link in the relation or something. I'll take a look and write back.
ElliottPlack (2020-06-12 15:28:14+00:00): Got it. I just uploaded the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86574067

The issue here was that the three islands inside the bay were still tagged with coastline. That was surely causing some error with the coastline. All is good now.
Sparks (2020-06-12 15:35:29+00:00): Ahhh, I missed that.  Lets hope that fixes everything.  Thanks for finding that.
Moritz-Schmidt (2025-11-28 13:05:55+00:00): I can't find any "erotic shop" here. It is just somewhere in the woods at a lake...

Why did you add this POI here?
user_5359 (2020-05-20 18:21:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note that we only note real things and not game items like Pokemon Parks. Please be sure to do so.
user_5359 (2020-05-20 17:33:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Leo Slager (2020-05-20 17:32:19+00:00): Dag Richard,
Zet een node op de plaats waar je de weg wilt splitsen.
Selecteer de node en kies boven in het scherm "Gereedschappen"
Kies "weg splitsen" en klaar is kees.
Prusaker (2020-05-20 16:41:27+00:00): Давно не ездил по Городецкого, поэтому спрошу - левый поворот на Шаранговича уже разрешили?

https://yandex.by/maps/157/minsk/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=27.451104%2C53.883905&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=312.129639%2C10.735570&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=27.448355%2C53.884238&panorama%5Bspan%5D=117.787231%2C69.099579&z=17.5

Помню тут было как на панораме, движение только прямо и направо.
Prusaker (2020-05-20 20:32:00+00:00): Уточнил, действительно совсем недавно сделали съезд на Шаранговича. Добавлю полосу для поворота налево.
eggie (2020-05-20 16:07:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-20 16:10:01+00:00): In OSM taggen we geen adressen nogmaals op het gebouw. Er is al een adresnode aanwezig. ok heb je een multipolygoonrelatie gemaakt van het gebouw. Dat is niet de bedoeling.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-20 16:14:31+00:00): Ik heb wat aangepast
westis (2020-05-20 18:08:52+00:00): Inte mycket att säga om, ser bra ut! Uppe i den nordvästra delen av den taggade stigen går den väldigt nära elljusspåret. Ansluter de till varandra där i verkligheten, eller de går parallellt?

Verkar finnas några ytterligare stigar i närheten som inte heller är karterade ännu, bl.a. en anslutning till cykelvägen där uppe, liksom på udden bakom Valje gård. 

Bra jobbat!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85507551
tehweasel (2020-05-20 18:36:55+00:00): Tack för feedback de går egentligen parallellt men är öppet mellan utan mycket växter jag tror man kan gör som man vill där.

Japp det finns mer att göra i området ska bara reka en gång till live på anslutningen till cykelvägen innan jag fortsätter man kommer ner en bit med bil nämligen och kan parkera men minns inte hur långt, dock inga stora avstånd.
user_5359 (2020-05-20 17:42:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a not closed way with a name "2182 Delivery Zone" and add a highway key to this way. This mean you paint  a not existing highway over existing highways. Please have a look on the key boundary (see wiki.osm.org), but I assumed we don't add any privat (business internal) boundary. I will revert this changeset.
ToniE (2020-05-21 11:31:42+00:00): Hallo e-m-i

könntest Du bei diesemWeg:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806403724

mal prüfen, ob da nicht wieder ein highway=residential dran gehört.

Gefunden hier: 

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-KVV-Analysis.html#bus_193

Gruß,
Toni
karson_ (2020-05-20 19:06:59+00:00): Isn't that website for the city of Moscow. Why would it belong as the website for the entire country of Russia?
SGorskiy (2020-05-21 05:00:29+00:00): http://www.gov.ru/ правильный сайт
BER319 (2020-05-23 17:55:24+00:00): Hallo momabebra,

warum hast du hier Flächen aus dem Schlosspark Biesdorf ausgeschnitten?
er Park ist die gesamte Fläche.
Oder sollten das Wiesen werden, dann bitte vervollständigen, so sind das einfach leere Flächen.
BER319 (2020-05-25 18:02:18+00:00): Hallo momabebra,
könntest du dich bitte einmal der leeren Flächen annehmen die du hier kreiert hast. Da fehlen noch die entsprechenden Schlüssel wie landuse=gras oder ähnliche. Oder soll das so bleiben?
Vielen Dank
abrensch (2020-05-24 13:08:51+00:00): Hallo blaubaer,

mich verwirrst das. Die Nünningstarsse selbst hat ja noch ein gate und motor_vehicle=no

Laut Presse ist aber die Bahnbrücke freigegeben, während die A40-Auffahrt noch gesperrt ist:

https://www.radioessen.de/artikel/nuenningbruecke-in-frillendorf-ab-mitte-mai-frei-fuer-autos-566181.html

In OSM ist es jetzt genau andersrum?

Gruss, Arndt
blaubaer11 (2020-05-25 10:59:34+00:00): Hallo Arndt, ich bin beide Straßen, also die neue Nünningbrücke und die BAB Ab- und Auffahrt vor der Änderung abgefahren. Ist beides offen.
Gruß
Blaubaer
blaubaer11 (2020-05-25 11:16:18+00:00): vehicle no und das gate habe ich entfernt. Hatte ich komplett übersehen....
slodki (2021-11-05 19:25:59+00:00): building=hospital nie bardzo pasuje dla budynku technicznego pralni (za wiki: "służy do oznaczenia budynku opieki nad chorymi na terenie szpitala").
Za to warto by poszerzyć obszar amenity=hospital o budynki techniczne szpitala Narutowicza przy ul. Siemaszki
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-16 01:24:36+00:00): Hm, nie pamiętam tej edycji ani miejsca - otworzyłem https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2972379 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2972380
trial (2020-07-22 07:48:16+00:00): Je ne comprends pas : "Cité Salvador Allende" n'est pas un quartier mais comme indiqué dans un changeset précédent une maison des associations.
andrewwiseman (2020-08-07 22:15:26+00:00): Thanks for mapping! Make sure to only add the name if you know the name of that feature. It looks like you added the hashtags to the Name field. The hashtags are what you add when you save your edits.
Пивун (2020-07-20 00:10:08+00:00): Сеть "Карусель" не закрылась, а постепенно трансформируется к 2022 году, и неизвестно, закроется ли. Замена на картах всех "Каруселей" "Перекрёстками" – преждевременна, как минимум.
См. https://www.vedomosti.ru/business/articles/2019/09/26/812199-transformatsiya-gipermarketov
В СПб преобразовано всего несколько "Каруселей", остальные как работали, так и продолжают.
Константин Гам (2020-07-20 09:59:36+00:00): Да, странная история. Где-то Карусели, ггде то продали Окею... 

Где Карусели остались, я их верну.
eggie (2020-05-20 17:49:26+00:00): Eric.. Op één plaats toch wel.. Bij het fietsenhok. Linker alttoets weet je nog.
 
Geef maar toe het was expres... :)
Zie hier
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85508796


En het terrein.. Tja.. gewoon taggen wat je ziet. Stukjes  leisure=garden . landuse =grass  losse bomen als natural=tree op nodes.
bosschages natural=scrub
Up to you
Succes verder
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-20 17:53:57+00:00): Volgens de BGT omtrekgericht zie ik geen lus en lijkt het meer op een stethoscoop.
Wat je in je oren stopt zijn de highway=turn_circle  (s) 
Die transparant heb ik openstaan over mijn luchtfoto.
Eggie
Eric Ferguson (2020-05-20 21:02:57+00:00): Wat bedoelje met "sthethoscoop"?  Ik woon hier, en zo ziet de lus er uit.
eggie (2020-05-20 21:37:00+00:00): Up to you.. 
Je vraagt om een review.. 
Ik kijk in de BGT. Daar staan de wegen allemaal in.
Je zou het kunnen doorgeven als iets niet klopt.
https://verbeterdekaart.kadaster.nl/#?geometry.x=146005.18&geometry.y=456599.99&zoomlevel=13

In de BGT staat het fout  .. Wanneer je uitzoomt naar de TOP 10 klopt het wel.

De BGT is ook niet 100% foutloos.
Je kunt dus een terugmelding doen. 
Gr eggie
literan (2020-05-20 20:22:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access%3Dpermit означает, что пропуск дается любому лицу без проволочек (т.е. он простая формальность). Реально на фабрику может любой легко попасть (причем и на автотранспорте, т.к. вы ставите access=permit)??
RFuser11 (2020-05-20 20:24:03+00:00): можно гдето проэто подробнее прочитать?
literan (2020-05-20 20:26:26+00:00): так я же дал ссылку)
RFuser11 (2020-05-20 20:54:53+00:00): ок, я видимо не так интерпретировал фразу :Доступ только при наличии действующего разрешения или лицензии".
 постараюсь на днях разобраться и поправить
literan (2020-05-20 21:02:04+00:00): да, фраща некорректная. Я уже общаюсь с тем, кто ее переводил, продумываем, как лучше написать. Может, у тебя тоже есть мысли? (ничего что на ты?)
RFuser11 (2020-05-21 16:33:06+00:00): конечно, запросто на ты можем. Вообще по поводу пропускной системы лучше сделать от более свободного доступа к более закрытому в порядке следования. Вот например как отображается permissive (зеленым) и permit (красный). Судя по цветовой дифференциации, красный более запрщаемый чем зеленый. https://radikal.ru/lfp/c.radikal.ru/c12/2005/b1/4843008c1c42.jpg/htm Потому permit считаю более запретительный чем permissive
literan (2020-05-21 16:44:42+00:00): ну, это уже вопрос к разработчикам османда, как они цвета назначат. По идее для permit надо бы желтый назначить (потому что permissive - это когда можно по чьей-то территории вообще безо всяких пропусков, например, на территории школ у нас обычно свободный проход, но могут и закрыть).
RFuser11 (2020-05-25 17:05:42+00:00): по поводу тегов ограничения доступа я так понимаю однозначной позции нет. Та ссылка, чт оты привел тоже общедоступная и может содержать недостоверные данные. Если была бы официальная позиция по этому вопросу было бы супер.
janolezab (2020-05-20 16:57:46+00:00): (ich hoffe, das sind auch die amtlichen Namen. Da sind auf jeden Fall Schilder, auf denen das steht)
aixbrick (2020-05-22 09:13:49+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe hier ein paar kleinere Korrekturen vorgenommen. Das ging schneller, als alles hier anzusprechen, u.a. habe ich die Gebäudedurchfahrt als solche getaggt. Schaue es dir an: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85599646. Bei Unklarkeiten, einfach fragen.
Gruß
VIPINDAS K (2020-07-03 18:13:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=17/12.37613/75.09047
ഇത് ശരിക്കും farm land തന്നെ ആണോ?
Use maxar premium imagery (beta)..
eggie (2020-05-20 17:43:58+00:00): Dag Wim  Hierover zijn talloze draadje te vinden op het forum.
Wanneer al een viaduct is taggen we eigenlijk  niet nog een keer een tunnel.
Zelfs als iedereen het een tunnel noemt. 
Maar up to you.. Geen idee hoe het echt zit. :)

MVG,
Eggie
EarlEBird (2020-05-20 17:33:21+00:00): Also used Yandex Panorama to confirm permitted turn maneuvers using road markings.
eggie (2020-05-20 18:00:19+00:00): Niks mis mee.. keurige culvert
Wel druk met die fietspaden in de stalling.
Je kunt toevoegen covered=yes aan het gedeelte dat onder het dak zit. Het  inpandige pad mag je dan met nodes vastmaken aan het gebouw.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-05-20 18:01:11+00:00): Ahh .. het is geen overdekt gebouw? .. herstel. dan klopt het.
rainerU (2020-05-23 04:52:17+00:00): Hallo Handimappi,

danke für deine Beiträge in Ulm-Lehr. Bei den Höfen hätte ich eher einen Punkt place=isolated_dwelling + name=* gesetzt als den namen an das Landuse zu hängen. Das unterstreicht den Charakter eines einzelnen Hofs ausserhalb der Ortschaft besser hervor. landuse=farmyard + name=* könnte auch ein Bauernhof innerhalb der Ortschaft sein.

Grüße
Rainer
DressyPear4 (2020-05-22 19:25:49+00:00): Olá, informações pessoais não devem ser adicionadas no mapa, considerando que elas se tornam públicas, caso queira criar seu próprio mapa, recomendo este https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pt-br/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85512693
Константин Гам (2020-06-01 11:34:13+00:00): Пожалуйста внимательнее при добавлении магазинов! Дикси и РеалЪ это супермаркеты, а не продуктовые
Itd5sS6uZ (2020-05-20 17:57:32+00:00): Bing StreetSide is another source. JOSM kept eating that up before I uploaded and I forgot to check that.
MCDA (2020-05-20 20:22:41+00:00): Hi, to be honest I think you are making this junction more complex than it needs to be.

Personally, I would prefer the use of lanes, as the current lay out suggests that there are separate distinct roads for bypassing the junction.  For example, coming into the town from the Dublin road and going out towards Friths Pass, the current layout looks like you can bypass the junction out a nice wee one lane road.  From memory this is not the case.  There are three lanes, sharp left, straight on and sharp right.  See imagery on Mapillary - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?login=true&lat=54.3436032&lng=-7.63054&z=18.686964006088175&pKey=f-KDh1qV4m5biOuP4TdqBw&focus=photo
YourWorstThought (2020-05-21 00:28:33+00:00): That's understandable and I fully understand where you're coming from. My original intention, however, was to incorporate the pedestrian islands within the junction which previously weren't "on the map". Perhaps I should shorten the "turn roads" which appear to bypass the junction and that might help? Thanks
Cebderby (2020-05-22 04:49:50+00:00): One issue with junctions that are 'turn off to stay on' (in this case the A4), is that the choice if which ways are link and non-_link can be reversed from 'normal'.  I would have been tempted to allow routing along the A4 in both directions to stay on the A4 (non _link), which is not the case as mapped here (affecting the choice of way type and ref for 3 of these way segments)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-05-30 11:33:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85979146 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon edits.  See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8886170 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3719
Carto'Cité (2020-06-22 09:43:32+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu,
Je retire le double sens cyclable sur cette rue puisqu'elle n'est plus à sens unique. N'hésite pas à me dire si ce n'est pas ça.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2020-06-22 09:43:50+00:00): Pardon... sur cette rue :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224996233
Charles
flohoff (2020-05-23 12:45:30+00:00): Hi,
warum hast du hier die Namen entfernt ? Sind die Falsch? Oder hast du dir nur nicht verifizieren können?

Flo
user_10799485 (2020-05-23 13:29:30+00:00): Weil es die Stauseen ganz einfach nicht mehr gibt. Die wurden zurückgebaut . Da fließen wieder ganz normal die Bäche. Ruf bei der Biostation PB-Senne in Delbrück an. Herr Lakmann oder auch Frau Bergener können dir das bestätigen. Das auf dem Truppenübungsplatz-Senne alle Stauseen entfernt wurden. https://www.bs-paderborn-senne.de/ueber-uns.html
flohoff (2020-05-23 14:01:48+00:00): Aber wenn es die nicht mehr gibt muss doch mehr entfernt werden als der name oder?

Da sind doch wetland Flächen eingetragen die dementsprehcend dann auch nicht mehr existieren sollten oder?

Ich zweifel ja nicht an das es nicht mehr gibt, ich zweifel an das das entfernen des name alleine richtig ist.

Flo
user_10799485 (2020-05-23 14:17:09+00:00): Was soll da noch sein? Dann mach es bitte weg. Ich habe heute nicht ewig Zeit.