piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patrik Eschle (2021-09-26 14:26:17+00:00): Hallo alcros - gute Frage, die man wohl nur durch Nachschauen beantworten kann. Ich habe den Privatzugang von der Bizauer-Strasse aus gesehen (aus der Erinnerung beim Haus 45), aber beim Haus 141 nicht geschaut, ob es dort auch noch privat ist.
Bist du aus der Gegend und kannst das klären? Ich werde erst wieder in Bizau sein, wenn beim Meusburger im Hilkat der Käse reif ist :-)
Gruss,
  Patrik
alcros (2021-09-27 09:30:47+00:00): Hallo Patrik, nein, leider komme ich nicht aus der Gegend. Bin dort lediglich mal zum MTBen unterwegs ;-)
Habe das nur auf der Karte gesehen und fand es recht seltsam, dass es 1. nur bis zur Brücke private ist und von der anderen Seite nicht und 2. an der Straße ja doch einige Häuser sind, also eher nicht auf eine Privatstraße hindeutet.
Noch ein allgemeiner Hinweis: Ein Privatweg ist nicht immer gleichzusetzen mit access=private, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access=private.
Patrik Eschle (2021-10-11 09:36:20+00:00): Ein Mapper in Bizau wird das klären; ich werde hier berichten
noelbov (2021-09-10 12:27:18+00:00): Hallo,
Infolgedessen gibt es mehrere Unterbrechungen für die Fahrradknotenpunkt-Strecke 01-91. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1771856#map=14/50.7494/5.9797 und https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/de/analysis/route/1771856
Viele Grüße, NB.
skyper (2023-01-26 21:02:57+00:00): Hallo Andy,
`man_made=communications_tower` bezeichnet Fernseh- und Fernmeldetürme. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/119711888 sieht aber nach einer Antenne (man_made=antenna) in der Mitte mit Umbauung aus. Sollte an der Isolierung und den Verbindungskabeln am Boden zu erkennen sein. Allerhöchstens ist es jedoch ein `man_made=tower`. Kannst Du das bitte nochmal überprüfen und entsprechend korrigieren? Siehe auch https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22677.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
Andy Stricker (2023-01-29 14:49:01+00:00): Hallo Skyper
Danke für den Hinweis. Vermutlich liegst du richtig, ich habe das nie in aller Tiefe recherchiert.
Ich habe noch das hier gefunden, zu dem was da dran hängt:
http://www.hb9sp.ch/concrete5/index.php/services/70cm-dmr-relais-2
Von mir aus kann das angepasst werden.
skyper (2023-02-22 20:24:52+00:00): Hi Andy,
danke für die Antwort und den Link. Hat leider etwas gedauert, aber jetzt habe ich es korrigiert und die Webseite eingetragen.
VG, skyper
gurglypipe (2021-09-10 10:48:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding your local knowledge!

It looks like there are quite a few dragged nodes in this changeset, where you’ve accidentally moved a shop/fence/solar panel from one place to another. Please watch out for that in future if you can. I’ve fixed these dragged nodes so everything’s fine now.

Please also make separate edits for separate areas — so in this case one edit for your changes to Lancaster, and one for your changes to Kirkby Lonsdale. That makes it easier for other local mappers to review changes without seeing areas they’re not familiar with.

Thanks again for adding your local knowledge to the map, and please continue to do so :)
maraf24 (2021-09-09 21:05:41+00:00): Biały kolor nie oznacza drogi utwardzonej.
UndeadRider (2021-09-09 21:28:46+00:00): Jest to droga leśna, dziurawa, po deszczu ciężko przejechać, z dojazdem do jednej posesji. Obok dodalem droge ktora jest na mapach miejskich.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 21:50:11+00:00): Taki jest mniej więcej sens tutaj koloru białego - że można drogą dojechać do kogoś.
Chyba że tam nikt nie mieszka, ew. mieszkańcy chodzą piechotą lub jeżdzą traktorem :)
UndeadRider (2021-09-09 23:26:14+00:00): Czyli nie mozna w jakis sposob oznaczyc ze ta droga rozni sie od drogi obok, Lubczykowej? W tym momencie na mapie wyglada jak zwykla droga asfaltowa prowadzaca do posesji.
Dawid2849 (2021-09-10 06:07:23+00:00): Można dać jako highway=service, w sumie bardziej pasuje niż residential.
UndeadRider (2021-09-10 08:34:09+00:00): Czy zmieni to wyglad samej trasy na mapie? Zeby bylo wiadomo ze zapuszczenie sie tam osobowka moze wizac sie z wzywaniem pobliskiego farmera do pomocy ? :D
JeroenvanderGun (2021-09-09 20:38:11+00:00): Voor meer info zie deze discussie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109746223
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:10:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
marczoutendijk (2021-09-10 12:52:49+00:00): Hi Car162,
Could you please give a more descriptive name to your changeset comment? "a minor edit" is rather vague. Simply telling what you are editing is easy. Please read this: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Car162 (2021-09-10 19:26:52+00:00): make the following streets less curved
Car162 (2021-09-10 19:34:39+00:00): Add a roundabout in Derech HaYam that connect a new street in construction to Ramat HaNasi neighbourhood
Car162 (2021-09-10 19:36:17+00:00): The left turns from Derech HaYam to shunit and Simha Holtsberg are canceled
marczoutendijk (2021-09-10 20:07:09+00:00): Hi Car162,
Thanks for the added information, but you should (in your future edits) give that info at the top, when you upload your changes.
Frans S (2021-10-09 09:55:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110993985
GITNE (2023-02-06 12:42:27+00:00): In this changeset you have added `name` tags to roads that do not have a name (no street name sign) but only have a route reference, like the `NY 25A`. Again, there was nothing wrong with the OSM database. The issue you have is with your app. Contact your app’s developers and please revert your changes.
user_12470424 (2023-02-06 14:07:02+00:00): There are street name signs correlated with both "NY 25A" and "NY 25" in both the Town of Brookhaven & the Town of Riverhead. They refer to these roads as "Route 25A" & "Route 25", respectively, but it looks as if this has been changed by another user.
GITNE (2023-02-06 15:52:44+00:00): I was just lacking any source data to support this because for many years peripheral roads did not get any street name signs. However, I have finally found some evidence like here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=40.947302581768&lng=-72.90196952632&z=17&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=984944912157613&x=0.7928552283790877&y=0.5328145091126502&zoom=2 or
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=40.943763987273&lng=-72.861849935993&z=17&focus=photo&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=1685451221632248&x=0.7240181802281513&y=0.3927159762005113&zoom=1

Well, I guess than thank you for updating the names. Yet, one should be very careful when assuming and checking how far the naming goes.
GITNE (2023-02-06 20:55:05+00:00): Oh, I forgot to mention that whenever you add a street name it is probably best to check any existing `addr:street` tag values in the vicinity. For example, I have encountered tags like `addr:street=New York 25A`. Otherwise, address search will not update and will not work correctly.
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:10:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
WoodWoseWulf (2021-09-10 03:56:25+00:00): Hi Neokills,

It looks like you've got this park overlapping a lot of houses, are you sure the boundaries you created are accurate?
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-10 14:56:55+00:00): Hi acceIIerating, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
mueschel (2021-09-15 10:00:46+00:00): Hi,
please check this way, something went wrong with the tracktype tag
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420136305
Creator13 (2021-09-15 11:33:09+00:00): Thanks! Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111240383
ottwiz (2021-09-10 08:25:26+00:00): Hello!I've got a question, I see you draw the border of the Recreation area, but actually, where did you get the source from the borders, and also because most of it is wooded, wouldn't be better if all of it was leisure=nature_reserve? See here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Like in the case of Yellowstone National Park, even if its name suggests, it's used for recreation, but its vegetation isn't handled as much as like in a city park.

I'm going to discuss this on OSMUS slack(#local-west-virginia), because it looks weird to see tree leaves combined with a park, but the park is on a higher layer, so it renders weirdly on Carto.
ottwiz (2021-09-17 15:39:31+00:00): By the way, on OSMUS slack I was suggested to split up the forest i drew there a while ago, so now it renders well.
Matt McCutchen (2021-09-27 13:39:41+00:00): Hi!  I've been trying to keep the construction status of this area up to date on OSM for the last few months, and I noticed that your changeset opens several important roads and closes others.  I briefly visited the area yesterday and confirmed that the status of these roads is still as it was in my https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110811542, not as in this changeset: most importantly, a segment of Executive Boulevard is still closed and the entirety of Grand Park Avenue is still open.  Where did you get your information?  From imagery?  (It looks consistent with the current "Esri World Imagery".)  Remember that imagery can be months or years out of date, so you should think carefully before overwriting OSM data recently changed by other users in a survey with your own data based on imagery.

Is it OK with you if I go ahead and revert the open/closed status changes?  In the process of making those changes, your editor seems to have created, deleted, and repurposed several way objects with no net effect on the resulting geometry, which makes the object-level history more confusing to view.  I'd like to take the opportunity to revert those object manipulations as well so that it will be easier for users to compare the object-level state before your changeset and after my partial revert.  I'll keep the changes from your changeset that seem plausible to me:
- Adjustments to node coordinates and refinements of ways with additional nodes, except for the intersection of Executive Boulevard and Grand Park Avenue, which I am sure is now at node 5537854486 (as I had it) and not 5344536417.
- Changes of "highway" tags from "service" to "residential" and from "unclassified" to "tertiary".
- The naming of several segments as Grand Park Avenue.  I left them unnamed because I thought the signage was unclear on the ground: it just said "Grand Park Avenue" at one end and "Executive Boulevard" at the other.
- The "lanes=4" tag on Grand Park Avenue.

Concretely, the changeset I'm proposing is https://mattmccutchen.net/private/20210927-restore-exec-grand-park.osm .  You can open it in JOSM and review the specific changes by searching for "modified OR deleted" with "all objects" enabled and pressing the "History" button on individual objects.  Is it OK with you if I submit this now?

Thanks for your attention!
GiriSrini (2021-09-28 05:57:05+00:00): Hi Matt, thanks for the feedback. Yes, given that you've visited the area recently it absolutely makes sense for you to revert what you feel is appropriate. I actually meant to request a review on my changes here, as I've done for many of my other edits elsewhere, so it surprised me when I looked back today and realized that I hadn't ticked that box at the time. In any case, you don't need to worry about offending me!

As you suspected, I did go by satellite imagery here. I haven't had the chance to venture to the area myself lately, and being relatively new to editing OSM, I hadn't realize how outdated the images could be. I'll definitely try to more careful about that in the future & confirm my changes with in-person visits.
Matt McCutchen (2021-09-28 13:50:10+00:00): Thanks for your quick and kind response.  I submitted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111820423.  We appreciate your support for OSM!
BCNorwich (2021-09-10 06:23:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't know which house is number 23 but it's not the whole block. The building on Main Street would be tagged as building-residential as it contains several residences.
The building levels tag is described here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels

I've made some amendments.

Regards Bernard.
Glassman (2021-09-11 15:47:14+00:00): #TIP: when adding multiple addresses to a building, use individual points (nodes) for each address.

Question? Why did you delete the address 1661 22nd Way Northeast? It appears to be a valid address according to King County records? See https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110996880
Dawid2849 (2021-09-10 17:01:20+00:00): STOP! You're destroying map that is used by many people, including emergency services! THIS MAP IS NOT FOR FUN. I reverted this vandalism.
Dawid2849 (2021-09-10 17:04:50+00:00): If you want to draw some fictional roads, try opengeofiction.
ovruni (2021-09-09 22:57:44+00:00): Hola, he notado que en algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios ha agregado valores como "Av.", estas abreviaturas están desaconsejadas, [0] en su lugar utilice "Avenida", de la misma forma el uso para los valores de nombres en direcciones al igual que el nombre se recomiendo la mayúscula en la primera letra de cada palabra. [1]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_.28no_hacer_esto.29
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may.C3.BAsculas
CAI Stabia (2021-12-03 13:35:02+00:00): Ciao come mai hai cambiato la tipologia di highway da path a track? 
Quelli da te modificati, hanno natura di sentiero e non di carrareccia o strada bianca
GDM789 (2021-12-03 13:57:24+00:00): Buonasera, mi risulta che arrivino i furgoni quasi all'acquafredda, non credo sia classificabile come sentiero
cpmsmith (2021-09-09 22:42:00+00:00): Second link got cut off:
https://ncc-ccn.gc.ca/closures/lane-closures-on-colonel-by-drive-september-october
ChookMan (2021-09-10 09:31:38+00:00): ok I meant Bucklands Beach sorry :p
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110997349
ivanbranco (2021-09-14 15:43:37+00:00): Hi old wolf,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9077993178

what's the meaning of "Суздальські Ряди вулиця=12"? tags are usually in english language
ovruni (2021-09-09 23:11:41+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado vías de ciclovía separadas, sin embargo el comentario de tu conjunto de cambios y la imagen que pusiste en source me sugiere que no has visto la vía. La etiqueta de cicleway en una vía separada es para cuando existe una vía aparte de la calle, la cual puede estar dividida por una baranda u otro elemento físico, si la vía se encuentra dividida solamente con una pintura o linea, se debe de agregar como una etiqueta "cicleway=left" o "cycleway:right" en la calle existente. ¿Esta es una vía separada?
Saludos
TuAmigoElEditor (2021-09-10 00:42:55+00:00): Hola, hoy pase por ese sitio y se me dio por hacer la ciclovia. La separacion de la ciclovia tienen unos palos naranjas similares a los de este video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDZZPeSd_vg
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
Makai77 (2021-09-10 00:53:38+00:00): Jak to nieistniejącej? Mnóstwo osób tej nazwy tam używa. Cieplak, czyli skrót od nazwy ulicy Cieplińskiego przy której ten park się znajduje
cheatach (2021-09-10 07:19:06+00:00): Takie mnóstwo że pierwsze słyszę a po drugie chcesz edytować to używaj pierwotnego konta
Makai77 (2021-09-10 00:44:42+00:00): Po co mi park psujesz ty psuju
cheatach (2021-09-10 07:21:19+00:00): Jedynym psujem tu to jesteś ty. Naprawdę prosisz się o kłopoty
Road–Runner (2023-08-24 00:23:23+00:00): Auch wenn du den Tag nicht gesetzt hast, kannst du dich evt. erinnern ob, hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131245623 Radfahrer wirklich fahren dürfen? Das erscheint mir nämlich etwas verdächtig.
Hungerburg (2023-08-24 08:45:49+00:00): Die Radroute führt daneben am Forstweg. Kann mich nicht erinnern ob da etwas ausgeschildert war, auf keinen Fall ein Radfahrer frei. Und da Radfahren im Wald und auf Kulturgrund in Österreich per se Besitzstörung ist und ausdrückliche Erlaubnis braucht - ich denke du kannst das beruhigt zurücksetzen - ich nehm da gern "vehicle=forestry" - das scheint mir die korrekteste Art.
ovruni (2021-09-10 04:37:40+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han unido vías que han generado un error en una relación de restricción de giro. Por otra parte la vía que se ha modificado indicaba el nombre "Pasaje San José" y usted la cambio a "Jirón San José". ¿Cual es la fuente pública que indique este  prefijo de Jirón?
Saludos
mariotomo (2021-09-15 19:22:56+00:00): Quizás con la finalidad de evitar revertir trabajo útil, podría el autor mencionar claramente sus fuentes, y comentar más explícitamente los conjuntos de cambios, en la forma "verbo de acción, objeto, detalles".