piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dvdhoven (2020-01-02 15:58:20+00:00): Ik heb deze changeset reverted.
Er waren meerdere fietsroutes en een wandelroute beschadigd geraakt. Hele gaten in de routes.
Let erop dat je alles en alles inlaad in JOSM. Als je gaat knippen en niet alle routes zijn ingeladen, dan krijg je gaten.
Je kunt ook de plugin continuousdownload installeren. Ik gebruik die al jaren, maar veel JOSM gebruikers willen daar niet aan. Ik vind hem heel fijn en daarmee krijg je alles ingeladen.

Vriendelijke groet
Dick van den Hoven
smootheFiets (2020-01-02 16:16:33+00:00): Ik experimenteer inderdaad met Overpass en "sparse editing". Dacht ik had het begrepen, maar kennelijk niet. 
Bedankt voor het bericht en voor het goede opletten! Ik let in toekomst beter op. In feite, ik probeer het meteen opnieuw. Ik hoop dat dit nu beter lukt.

Trouwens, hoe zag je de stukke routen zo snel? Ik kijk wel soms op Osmose, maar dat wordt pas over de 24u geactualiseerd.
smootheFiets (2020-01-02 16:29:12+00:00): Ik heb het opnieuw geprobeerd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79121317
Is dat beter?

In de nieuwe changeset staat er tenminste iets van gewijzigde "relations", dat was hier niet het geval (zie ik net).
dvdhoven (2020-01-02 16:57:42+00:00): Ja, dat lijkt nu in orde.

Er is een site https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl die voortdurend alle knooppuntroutes monitort en fouten meldt. 

Door een andere changeset, 79119973  van jou, is ook een gat ontstaan, dat repareer ik zo even

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
dvdhoven (2020-01-02 17:00:20+00:00): Ik zie dat je het zelf al opgepakt hebt.
Prima!
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:31:45+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048971
pangoSE (2020-01-15 08:30:45+00:00): Hi, thanks a lot for adding missing shelters. Did you photo them also?
Could you add more tags like bin, table, floor, floor:material, toilets, fireplace, wood_provided, etc to them?
bpw85 (2020-01-21 13:06:16+00:00): Hi Pango, what's your suggestion for how to add photos to POIs? Thanks.
pangoSE (2020-01-26 16:23:11+00:00): Mapillary is easiest and quickest. There is a plugin in JOSM to easily tag a feature with the mapillary photo id. 
Also adding it to wikimedia commons is possible. There it can be really hard to find if no coordinate is saved with the picture. I therefore recommend mapillary.
bpw85 (2020-01-27 18:36:22+00:00): I looked before, but I didn't find any option to add individual images to mapillary, rather than recording videos. Did I miss something?
pangoSE (2020-01-27 18:48:12+00:00): After downloading the app - press capture - change to manual - press the red record button for every image/angle you want. Upload. Done. :)
pangoSE (2020-01-27 18:48:44+00:00): If you have photos lying around WM Commons might be easier to upload to.
Arthtoach_Import (2020-01-03 13:48:05+00:00): Hi The_JF, there seems to be a bit of an edit war going on with the following building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561382719

You keep adding landuse=industrial to the building, however myself and another user have removed it multiple times. A number of editors (in particular JOSM) flag this up as an error because it's already within two other ways representing the landuse both as retail and as industrial.

I think the correct way forward is to fix the two other landuse areas (including removing the overlap) and to not individually tag buildings with their landuse. I think it's a rare occurrence that an individual building should be tagged with landuse, i.e. only when that building represents the full extent of the (for example) industrial area.

Thanks! I should also mention it's great to see another mapper adding lots of detail to the Leeds area!
Arthtoach (2020-01-12 07:58:17+00:00): I have continued this discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79465541

Please respond.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-06-23 03:12:23+00:00): Olá, importES, dividi este https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/760203897 caminho em parte para evitar o problema de cruzamento com a rodovia. seus dados originais ainda estão lá. Por favor, deixe-me saber se você tem alguma sugestão desta edição. Eu também encontrei alguém colocado túnel lá. portanto, achei que fosse um esclarecimento de que o corpo d'água não deveria passar pela rodovia. obrigada
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:28:29+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048856
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:30:38+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048943
marczoutendijk (2020-01-02 16:43:47+00:00): Zie forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68355
pangoSE (2020-01-15 08:23:38+00:00): Very nice, thanks  😃
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79120867
eggie (2020-01-02 18:18:04+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.  Adresnode nr 48 was al aanwezig. Ik heb nr 48a weer hersteld. 
MVG,
Eggie
PT-53 (2020-01-03 10:53:53+00:00): Hallo moosfrosch,
Du hast diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760216831/history
neu eingezeichnet, leider ohne Merkmale. Ergänzt Du die noch?

Bitte gibdoch auch bei jedem Änderungssatz einen kurzen aber aussagekräftigen Kommentar an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_.C3.84nderungssatz-Kommentare

Grüße und ein gutes neues Jahr
PT-53 (2020-01-13 11:22:03+00:00): erledigt
PT-53 (2021-02-07 14:10:38+00:00): Hallo moosfrosch, 
wie mir ein anderer Mapper heute mitgeteilt hat, hast Du mir eine Nachricht
über diesen Karten-Hinweis
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2045335#map=15/47.4708/10.2290
hinterlassen. 
Da ich Karten-Hinweise nur in meiner Gegend (Rund um den Bussen) anschaue, ist mir Dein Hinweis bisher verborgen geblieben.

Zur Info:
Für Antworten / Anmerkungen / Rückfragen auf CS-Kommentare muß man den entspr. Änderungssatz aufrufen (Link ist in der Mail enthalten) und kann dann dort einen neuen Kommentar erstellen und absenden.

Grüße
moosfrosch (2021-02-07 17:56:33+00:00): Hallo, danke, aber warum hast Du das erneut als "erledigt" abgehakt? Alle der von mir aufgezählten Mängel existieren weiterhin.
PT-53 (2021-02-08 07:41:12+00:00): Hallo moosfrosch,
Kartenhinweise sind für einzelne, konkrete Hinweise gedacht, nicht für pauschale Hinweise.
Grüße
moosfrosch (2021-02-08 09:33:20+00:00): OK. Sollte ich nochmals dort Urlaub machen, weiß ich, dass die Karten unzuverlässig sind und werde es mir sparen, zig Marker zu setzen oder ger selbst zu mappen, nur um die Versäumisse der lokalen Mapper auszubügeln, die ohnehin nicht dankbar für Hilfe sind, sondern nur Belehrungen raushauen.
PT-53 (2021-02-08 09:52:13+00:00): Hallo moosfrosch,
mein lokales Mappinggebiet liegt "rund um den Bussen" (Oberschwaben) und ist weit entfernt von Kierwang.
Schade daß Du jeden Hinweis gleich als Kritik an Deiner Arbeit siehst.
Grüße
Carnildo (2020-01-05 07:21:34+00:00): You added two houses both numbered "4612 West Elderberry Avenue".  Was that a mistake?
Alan (2020-07-02 16:54:27+00:00): Should this relation for Sto:lo Nation be the same as "Stó:lō Tribal Council" https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8514116? It looks like they share some parcels, but a lot of other parcels only exist in one or the other relation. Is this intentional?
Alan (2020-07-02 16:52:47+00:00): Hello Arctic Gnome, should this relation for Stó:lō Tribal Council be combined with the other partly-overlapping relation for "Sto:lo Nation" https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8512693?
ACarlotti (2020-01-07 00:40:07+00:00): Yes, but it is currently closed until summer 2020 for reconstruction, hence why it was tagged as under construction. I think this changeset needs to be reverted.
occultations (2020-01-07 03:48:49+00:00): Ok, sorry about that, I haven't been down there recently.
ACarlotti (2020-01-07 23:57:13+00:00): Reverted in changeset 79314757.
Some advice for a future - if you think something has been incorrectly mapped for years, then it's usually worth having a look at the history of the object, to see if it's been changed recently. In this case you would have immediately discovered that it had been retagged as under construction only five months ago, with the changeset comment stating "Stourbridge Common - Ditton Meadows cycleway jetty closed for reconstruction".
wille (2020-03-10 10:27:12+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está quase  tudo correto! Os erros foram apenas na classificação de alguns pontos de interesse.

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/79123104
eggie (2020-01-02 19:07:39+00:00): Dag Justin.. Eigenlijk kan die access=yes regel gewon helemaal weg.
Kijk je zelf nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
Geim (2020-01-08 07:25:47+00:00): Kunnen de barrier=fence ook weg (2 stuks)?
alesarrett (2020-01-05 18:03:56+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai modificato la geometria del Parco della Speranza. Sei però andato ben dentro la strada con il confine e, in un angolo, hai anche agganciato un nodo del parco con l'incrocio. Riesci a modificare per favore? A me sembra che il confine precedente andasse bene... come mai l'hai modificato?
ortotorto (2020-01-12 21:38:42+00:00): Dear Mr. Geletti,

I see that you've changed name for a mountain peak below Viševnik. You've successfully corrupted that info. Please don't do that if you are not an expert in area that you are editing.

That mountain peak was always named "Hrustnik" as it was written in source that I've provided (dr. Henrik Tuma - if you are not familiar with that source, please do not change ANY name in Slovenian Alps).
Many years after Mr. Tuma has researched names in the Julian Alps, cartographers came and draw maps. They've wrongly put a name of nearby saddle "Plesišče" to a peak and that mistake is still present on our today's maps.

It is 100% mistake - name "Plesišče" in somehow generic, it means "dance floor" and wherever it was used, there is a flat terrain in mountanious world. There is also one peak called "Plesišče" and it really is a "dance floor", I've found one photo on the web: https://mojalbum.com/iztokk/vrbanove-spice-od-spodnje-do-visoke-2299-in-amp-2408m-8-8-06/plesisce-in-luknja-pec-v-ozadju/4391665

Please do not corrupt OSM database - it represents a unique opportunity to improve quality of geographic data and you cannot just change everything you (or some non-professional webpage as Hribi.net) think should be different.

All the best from Slovenia.
Erik Geletti (2020-01-13 07:56:36+00:00): I'm really sorry for my mistake. Next time I will pay more attention on sources. I really appreciate the work you are doing. I'm trying to do my best to improve OSM everywhere I go.
Oproščam se spet za napako.
Lep pozdrav.

Erik
StefanB (2020-01-13 15:02:30+00:00): The used source tag is very general, i would suggest to use source:name tag instead to make it clear what it refers to (not coordinates or elevation).

Btw, GURS (in their abandoned TTN map, now published by computer museum) named it as Plesišče:
https://ttn.muzej.si/#17/46.35303/13.90343
and "Hrustniki" (plural of Hrustnik) 300m West of that peak
ortotorto (2020-01-13 16:06:51+00:00): Hi Stefan,
souce:name is not the best choice because you cannot put a name to database without noting what object (type - peak, saddle...) it names and where that object is. It is always all three of them, so maybe source:name+place+location? :) And for every object like that? I think that would be too much data for not much more information.

Yes, TTN also inherited that mistake as many others. If you want to stick to many decades old mistakes, why then use OSM at all?

On the old maps there was name "Na Robu, 1800 m" (map Radovljica l. 1920, map Julijske Alpe of Rudolf Badjura, l. 1939). 
The map that Mr. Tuma was using, also had name "Na Robu, 1800 m", but he intentionaly (after some survey & research) replaced it with "Hrustnik". He also notes "Rob" as (Kačji) Rob - southern ridge of Viševnik. There is no "Plesišče"; he mentiones only "plešišče", which means area without any vegetation. That area is named "Sive police".
When they've copied names to TTN and to other official maps they've made many similar mistakes and after some reseach it is clear that they were using Mr. Tuma's book (Imenoslovje Julijskih Alp), but they've put many names to the wrong locations (so they only were focused on source:name instead of source:name+type+location. Mr. Tuma unfortunately left no map with names, only a few skecthes (and only few of them were published). That's the reason for my small project: last year I've started making geospatial database of all names in Mr. Tuma's book. I am done with western part of the Julian Alps, so half done. When it will be finished, I will publish it on the web as searchable layer - of course not only in the OSM database, since it often gets "corrected" by anyone. ;)
StefanB (2020-01-14 07:06:39+00:00): Great! I did not want to suggest using the names from TTN unconditionally, just that those kinds of mistakes are easy to happen by mappers. Those wrong names crept onto the official maps decades ago, and from there onto many other maps, signposts, people's minds and colloquial use. 

Based on OSM's "as on the ground" principle the name in OSM should match the signposts leading to that peak, not some old source (a famous book 
by prominent author in this case). Other names should be put into alt_name or old_name tags. If signposts mention various names they can all be put into the name tag.

If Dr. Tuma listed only the names, without exact location it would be an argument to use source:name="dr. Henrik Tuma: Imenoslovje Julijskih Alp" tag (or even source:old_name tag) instead of current source tag ;-)
StefanB (2020-01-14 13:54:46+00:00): I (and OSM "as on the ground" principle) just want to avoid situations where a signposts mismatch the map. Eg someone wants to climb to "Hrustnik", but there is no such signposts, there are only signs towards "Plesišče", but there is no "Plesišče" on his (OSM) map. Or worse, someone needs urgent medical assistance on "Hrustnik" and rescuers are scratching their heads where that is.

I know mistakes happen to us all and we should attempt to fix them. But the fixing should be gradual, eg using both names on map (in the name tag), educating path markers, encouraging them to use correct names, not overnight replacing the names on the maps while the signposts still say the old names.

I know of existence of REZI, but have never inspected it in detail. From what you describe it seems terrible :)
StefanB (2020-01-15 09:25:06+00:00): I checked the aforementioned book (original arcicles in planinski vestnik and reprint from 2000) and can now understand why the officials had problems understanding it and misplaced many names in the official maps. 

It is never a clear cut between options 1 and 2 and some mapper discretion is needed, or else we'd end up with unknown archaic names such as "Dolina zajezerami" and "DraŽki vrh" which would better fit onto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map ;)
ortotorto (2020-01-15 10:54:38+00:00): I agree, of course we should not replace today's forms of names with their arhaic (or dialect) versions and that's not what we are talking about. ;) (anyway: "Zajezeram" is in use today as well, it's not forgotten yet)

My proposal is simply to reposition names to places where they really belong, to somehow undo positioning mistakes, done by transcribers. Natives, who always are a primary source of names, have told surveyer Dr. Tuma the right places of names but then transcribers made their mistakes and if you ask natives, many names on maps are thus wrong.

What would we do with the upcoming spelling update? Hundreds of names will require update, but everyone knows current spelling, not the new one. So should the OSM wait for some other map and then copy it or will OSM be the first map that would be up-to-date with the new spelling?
Glassman (2020-07-02 05:51:26+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/79123448
eggie (2020-01-02 18:10:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Het ziet er alleen wat wonderlijk uit. Wat is je bedoeling met deze actie?
Het bedrijf toevoegen?
Ik zal even wat herstellen hier. Dit was je bijdrage https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79123950


MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-02 18:25:54+00:00): De bedrijfsinfo heb ik aan de node toegevoegd.
Rendering duurt altijd even.
MVG,
Eggie
E de Wit (2020-01-02 18:37:44+00:00): Vreemd, de website geeft bij contactinfo Anne Wadmanwei 2b als adres.

-E de Wit
E de Wit (2020-01-02 18:39:17+00:00): Ervan uitgaande dat de info van de bronhouder klopt, zijn we dus actueler dan de site zelf. :)

Beste wensen trouwens.

-E de Wit
eggie (2020-01-02 19:12:27+00:00): Yep E de Wit  .Dat zag ik ook, De website loopt achter. Idem dito met de beste wensen.. 
Uiteraard ook voor Vital Effect !
gr Eggie
geow (2020-01-03 22:47:43+00:00): Hi Schitttalk, welcome to OSM and thank you for your first contributions. 

Just a quick hint, you mistakenly removed the main tag at the "Antoniuskapelle". This chapel is undeniable a "place of worship", see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship

Many thanks to user opendcc, who has already fixed this today: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2981535004/history

Cheers
geow
geow (2020-01-03 22:50:59+00:00): sorry, here is the right link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387198712/history
Truchin (2020-04-01 07:58:29+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour info, j'ai pas mal complété le secteur sur la base de l'othophoto (qui est déjà un peu ancienne) et de la couche Strava (pour les traces gps des sportifs qui utilisent l'application strava). Donc n'hésite pas à faire des ajouts/corrections/ajustements sur la base de ta connaissance du terrain.
Bonne continuation

Thomas
NikAlmino (2020-01-07 17:18:54+00:00): Sua edição está completamente confusa. O editor Potlatch que você usou possui muitos problemas e está em decadência. Em vez dele, use o editor iD.
RicoElectrico (2020-01-03 09:17:12+00:00): Cześć, możesz powiedzieć co było zamiarem tej edycji? Niestety opis "cd1" nic mi nie mówi.

Dodałeś linię energetyczną https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760241465 - to chyba pomyłka, a do tego przeniosłeś oznaczenie UM Gdynia/Sopot z budynków na punkty. Z tego co wiem, UM Gdynia zajmuje cały budynek, więc nie ma to uzasadnienia.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
RicoElectrico (2020-01-06 16:44:41+00:00): Z powodu braku odpowiedzi wycofałem. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79256750
Ficky Aditya Romansya (2021-07-14 05:08:28+00:00): Hi ai_shw,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/760241665) based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you, happy mapping!
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2020-02-07 18:49:44+00:00): Thanks for touching up my back yard, I live beside this golf club.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79125394
Rps333 (2020-02-07 20:11:52+00:00): No problem
Matthew Darwin (2020-01-03 04:39:23+00:00): Should the construction tag on 
Way: 669410208  be removed?
DannyMcD (2020-01-11 16:49:24+00:00): Yes
user_5359 (2020-01-02 21:21:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
However, I suspect that this data is not desired in OSM.
eggie (2020-01-02 18:58:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Het lijkt me niet correct om een node met building=yes  naast het gebouw te zetten.
Wat is je bedoeling. Het is hier toch al goed gemapt?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-02 19:05:20+00:00): Building at node removed from building.
Greetz,
Eggie
Tomboli (2020-01-03 22:58:30+00:00): Hi,

as far as I know, the whole parterre of Humboldtstraße 2 is used as Weinbar Weimar. Is there an issue when declaring the whole building as Weinbar?

I thought it is correctly handled with:

building = apartment
amenity = bar

I am new in contributing to OSM, so feel free to give me advices. :-)
Tomboli (2020-01-03 22:59:10+00:00): Same situation with "Klett Orthopädie Schuhtechnik": They own the whole first floor while the other stories are used as apartments...
MKnight (2020-01-04 12:10:25+00:00): preferred solution in OSM is to use nodes for POIs if the POI is only part of a building or other.
You can add level if you want to say on which floor the POI is.
MKnight (2020-01-04 12:11:44+00:00): Klett is the same "problem". The building is not the Klett.
I see, you have changed it back.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:26:26+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048730
neo-plan (2020-01-03 12:09:12+00:00): Все организации в посёлке написано через "и", но на проходной фабрики название через "е". Исправил всё назад.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:26:32+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048730
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:26:36+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048730
Tomas Straupis (2020-01-03 07:22:53+00:00): Nereikia keisti teisingo dviračių ir pėsčiųjų tako žymėjimo. Atstačiau highway=path+bicycle=designated+foot=designated.
Daugiau info čia: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:26:39+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048730
Josef73 (2023-01-15 12:58:14+00:00): Guten Tag, hat der "Döner to go" noch genauere Öffungszeiten?
Nedfro (2020-02-02 16:45:49+00:00): Woher hast du die Nummer? Im Datensatz des GWR (https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/) ist das Haus Nummer 15.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 13:26:44+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86048730
Leo Slager (2020-01-04 00:09:46+00:00): Changeset reverted due to masive damage to the map.
Hier können Sie das nog mal anschauen:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79127408
mapman44 (2020-01-03 01:56:40+00:00): Your changeset bounding box covers half of Canada and half of the US. Please submit a changeset after editing each area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79127459
streckenkundler (2020-01-03 14:09:11+00:00): Revert due to license violation. official data of Brandenburg may not be used.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79158812.
camelCaseNick (2020-01-06 21:22:28+00:00): Hey,
what do you mean with that value of the wikidata tag?
CamelCaseNick
swimdb (2020-01-06 21:25:35+00:00): It means I pasted the wrong thing in that box. Fixed, thanks.
fgouget (2020-04-30 19:47:56+00:00): À Liquisse Basse et d'autres lieux-dits proches, 'Nantée' ne devrait pas se trouver dans le champ population qui définit le nombre d'habitant. À quoi correspond ce nom ?
hugo12230 (2020-04-30 21:27:34+00:00): Alors j ai du peut-être me tromper sur la colonne 
Mais nantée désigne les habitants de Nant dont c est hameau font partie
Admasawi (2020-01-02 20:16:12+00:00): Correction: Source used was DigitalGlobe 2019-12-05