piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
felipeeugenio (2022-06-28 22:08:20+00:00): Hola Macarena
Esos unclassified que dibujas; mucho parecen ser entradas a recintos privados. En ese caso usar highway=service y access=private.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122932993
pesticides (2022-06-30 21:53:12+00:00): I will not re-add it, but this path should not have been deleted. It physically exists. The access=no tag can be used to indicate that access to a trail is prohibited.
northben (2022-07-01 18:56:25+00:00): That tag doesn't get picked up by various other mapping applications that use OSM data, resulting in it just looking like another trail. I find that respecting closures and waiting until sites are open to the public before documenting them is a better practice.
pesticides (2022-07-01 20:03:21+00:00): Thanks for responding. This is a problem with the applications, not with the map data. This situation is documented on the wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer

You're right that many applications don't distinguish paths with the access=no tag. Here is an example of one such path: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503291111 (more: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jNP). openstreetmap.org and OsmAnd distinguish private paths for some but not all map styles. Komoot does not distinguish private paths. I will file bugs against those projects/map styles.
Frans S (2022-06-28 09:55:51+00:00): Hello.  On this task, you made the same errors as  described before.  Mapping buildings twice. Not squaring buildings. Round buildings, not correct mapped.  You need to draw a triangle within the outlines, and still selected, push the O button. Then you see that it becomes a circle.
Take a look to this picture
https://drive.google.com/file/d/181XglLOPB5PQPQhr8308bPPX7yUK00DT/view?usp=sharing
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122933193
Frans S (2022-06-28 10:16:02+00:00): As you can see on the picture, you also connected nodes of buildings to each other. Don't do that.
Best regard
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 14:54:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123692417 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6119 .
Frans S (2022-06-28 09:39:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Important. You mapped already mapped buildings. This occurs when you do not zoom in far enough, Check the basic lessons how to map in IDeditor.
Despite you mapped buildings for the second time, you did not square the rectangular buildings you mapped. Also, check the basics.
I will check your other changesets as well. 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122933287
Frans S (2022-06-28 09:44:45+00:00): Hi. Another issue.  Please map round buildings as a round building and do not oversize the buildings. They all had to be adjusted.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122933287
TWHB (2022-07-01 11:54:01+00:00): Dear Panchito_de_GDL,

You recently edited roads near AIFA and made them primary. You also added roads near the entrance of Base Aérea Militar No. 1 that don't seem to exist on any imagery. Could you please explain why you made these changes.

Kind regards TBX
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-07-06 19:31:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123290547 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism
Mashin (2022-07-04 13:39:58+00:00): Hi,
here you also deleted roads that still exist. They appear a bit damaged but it still seems cars could drive there. If the roads have no trespassing they should be tagged as access=private or access=no.
user_12470424 (2022-07-04 19:05:36+00:00): Hi there! Can you specify what was deemed “incorrect”? I live over here and I’m going by what I’ve been seeing. Thanks!
ikopanjirukmana (2022-08-22 02:47:57+00:00): Hello, kaje001.
I'd like to talk about the "building=yes" tag on your changeset. In my idea, the building tag can only be used for one geometrical building. If there are a lot of buildings in one location and we want to map them, using the landuse tag rather than the building tag may be more appropriate.
CMIIW
kaje001 (2022-08-23 03:54:26+00:00): Hi ikopanjirukmana, Thank you for your suggestions and I agree with you. I would like to revise my edits here and I'll digitize individual buildings. Happy Mapping!
Enock4seth (2022-06-28 08:33:50+00:00): Hi Demo User,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping around Ho. 

Here is a good resource for getting started https://learnosm.org/

Just a quick comment:

Instead of using abbreviations such as HMA, I would recommend mapping the area for Ho Municipal Assembly covering all departments or buildings within. I am normally using the format <Munical Name> + <Department>, for example, "Ho Municipal Town And Country Planning Department" as I did here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313925302

I have earlier only added the name of municipal to this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204681653

Also, let only one object be represented once hence  we can remove the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313925302

Furthermore, note that Bing Imagery is very old and should not be used for extensive mapping of structures. You should compare with others, Maxar seems good but has offset issues here is how to change imagery https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/imagery/ 

Happy to help and Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:40:24+00:00): Hi,

the relation 5267004 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:52:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
willkmis (2022-06-28 09:20:56+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Do you have any evidence that this is the actual name of this house, like a sign on the ground?  If something was in a movie a long time ago, it does not mean that it has the name of that movie. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for how names in OSM work. 
Best,
Will
nikospag (2022-07-01 00:58:18+00:00): Changeset reverted because is against community consensus. Relations shouldn't be deleted.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-28 07:06:05+00:00): Dzięki za sprzątanie! Osmose w sumie znajdzie sporą część tegi typu problemów
okadatsuneo (2022-06-28 07:42:40+00:00): 初めまして。
森林のエリアが壊れているようにみえますが、大丈夫でしょうか？
安易に森林の線を消さないで下さいね。
nyampire (2022-06-29 08:55:21+00:00): うーん、森林部分だけ何度かリバートを試みたんですが、うまく直らないです。
切れてる部分、書き直したほうが早いかもしれません、すみません。
okadatsuneo (2022-06-30 00:28:06+00:00): 他の方が修正してくださったようです。
user_14913823 (2022-06-28 17:40:09+00:00): 兄弟不要乱画诶~
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:08:15+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122939277
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:08:09+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122939202
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Kogacarlo (2022-09-10 17:09:31+00:00): Maarten, wat ben je voor onzin aan het tekenen? Hier is geen loopbrug. Zelfs op de luchtfoto staat die niet meer. Zal ik hem weghalen of doe jij het? Groetjes Carlo
Kogacarlo (2022-09-10 17:11:02+00:00): Deze bedoel ik: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074111012 en de trap moet ook weg.
Kogacarlo (2022-09-10 17:23:09+00:00): Er was consternatie toen die werd gesloopt: https://omroepvenlo.nl/nieuws/artikel/einde-markante-loopbrug-urbanusweg
Maarten Deen (2022-09-12 06:16:33+00:00): Ik ben daar dit jaar nog geweest voor een coronatest (testlocatie was verhuisd naar het oude Océ hoofdkantoor) en ik kan zweren dat die er toen nog was. Misschien verwachtingspatroon? Ik heb er jaren gewerkt dus ik weet precies waar die is.
Kogacarlo (2022-09-12 10:07:57+00:00): De loopbrug paste zo goed in de omgeving dat bijna niet opvalt dat hij weg is. En de oudbouw https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49958551 gaat binnenkort ook verdwijnen. Ik weet niet of de sloopvergunning al rond is want er wonen/woonden allemaal dieren.
tux67 (2022-06-28 08:01:43+00:00): Hi Idam56,

with this change you have moved a School Building in Germany. I assume that was done by accident and has been fixed now. Gentle reminder to be careful with your changes.

BR
tux67
Idam56 (2022-06-28 08:14:46+00:00): Hi, 
it must have been in Mönchengladbach, right? I used to go to school there, Gymga, so I thought I‘ll check it out and must have made some changes on accident. Sorry for the inconvenience, I‘ll make sure to be more careful in the future!
SekeRob (2022-06-28 09:23:39+00:00): Don't know JOSM, but when saving in ID Editor you get below the comment area a summary of what was added/changed. Hope one day the greyed image of the map while writing closing comments expands the to area touched. Maybe that will shock a few into revisiting what they've done BEFORE committing the edits to OSM.

BTW, it seems to be happening an awful lot to those longing to go back to Die Heimat, es ruft ;o)

ciao.
tux67 (2022-06-28 10:14:12+00:00): @Idam56 - yes - you moved the Nodes of the School Building Gymnasium Gartenstraße a few meters. 

@SekeRob - also JOSM lists all changes before submitting them - I have not tried if there is a warning if you touched elements across a bigger distance, but I think it is covered here:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/19381?cversion=1&cnum_hist=4
SekeRob (2022-06-28 16:48:27+00:00): @tux67

Thanks for sharing that link, usable as hint for the ID Editor developers at Github.
Gazer75 (2022-07-01 10:11:37+00:00): Er denne opna? Prosjektleiar sa nei.
Inge Rønstad (2022-07-05 13:26:32+00:00): Åpna feil tunnel. Endrer tilbake
Gazer75 (2022-07-07 11:22:32+00:00): Ah ok. Er du lokalkjent? Om så veit du kva bilferjer som fortsatt skal gå?
Inge Rønstad (2022-07-07 11:57:25+00:00): Jeg er ruteplanlegger i FRAM
Aleks-Berlin (2022-06-29 08:49:30+00:00): Hi Gaessje, bitte lies
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:wikipedia?uselang=de#Bevorzugtes_Tagging
wikipedia=de:Abcd, nicht http...
Danke, Alex
Gaessje (2022-06-29 09:06:16+00:00): Danke, war mir neu.
Gruß Gaessje
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
RicoElectrico (2022-06-28 10:08:41+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za poprawę. Tu były zgłoszone uwagi w tej sprawie - nie odbiorę Ci przyjemności ich zamknięcia :) (włącz na osm.org warstwę uwag w widoku przeglądania lub edycji mapy)
melonusk (2022-06-28 10:15:39+00:00): Jestem świeżak, więc nie wiem, czy zrobiłem dobrze - dałem notatkę #3164786 na Resolved.
RicoElectrico (2022-06-28 13:52:46+00:00): Dobrze jest! :) Jeśli chcesz, spójrz na inne uwagi w okolicy, może coś jesteś w stanie zweryfikować i poprawić mapę.
Warin61 (2022-06-29 02:35:03+00:00): Part reversion to restore Melba Copland Secondary School boundary.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-06-28 11:37:10+00:00): I updated and normalized this intersection with placements, turn:lanes and change:lanes.
Christopher-0118 (2022-07-12 12:03:44+00:00): Hi! thank you for the clarification
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122941701
Minh Nguyen (2022-06-28 07:42:41+00:00): The crossing had already been mapped; this changeset indicates that the crossing is uncontrolled.
Snusmumriken (2022-06-28 08:21:25+00:00): Har Maxigrillen verkligen blivit en Max hamburgarrestaurang?
ghost_07 (2022-06-28 08:29:07+00:00): Thank you so much for this finding. Reverted this amenity change. Added not:brand:wikidata=Q1912172 to reduce probability of similar future error
Rom1 (2022-06-29 20:24:50+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai complété votre contribution et j'ai modifié également l'ancien site https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502971235 Sauriez-vous ce qu'il devient ? Quid également du CRDP ? Merci.
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:39:05+00:00): Hi,

the relation 12654050 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software).

Best regards
NeemaAlphonce (2022-07-06 06:19:04+00:00): Hi, sorry for the late reply. I created the problem without knowing, but tried to find the problem unfortunately  I didn't find it ( useless relation), hope was solved.
user_8101879 (2022-07-15 15:19:23+00:00): Hi,

no problem, I will delete it.
Best regards

(note : if you follow the link, under this comments section, by clicking on "12654050, v3" you will see the relation)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
xkillah (2022-06-28 08:50:48+00:00): completely removing destroyed building is a mistake because there are ruins left. Therefore it should be building=ruins
tapafon (2022-06-29 09:05:17+00:00): Local services are removing ruins right now. Nobody will rebuild the mall during the war, so removing isn't a mistake.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Frans S (2022-08-27 10:42:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122943427
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:37:24+00:00): Hi,

the relation 12208975 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software).

Best regards
Vinber (2025-11-29 11:31:45+00:00): salut,
je suis moyen convaincu pour des landuse=residential comme cela https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785338572#map=19/44.882788/-0.659593

je ne sais pas quoi en faire non plus, place=neighborhood ? mais landuse=residential me semble être pour des zones plus conséquentes non ?

à plus

tu as vu la carto tout à l'heure, où je ne serais pas d'ailleurs :)
KostyaZAyAc (2022-06-28 14:18:46+00:00): #mapbox_contribute
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122943875
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 10:16:04+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79100511/history has roof = flat that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=flat was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof
lenny32 (2025-12-18 11:21:22+00:00): You're right, I'll correct it.
LuxuryCoop (2022-06-28 10:38:52+00:00): 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
다름이 아니라 석가원 님께서 오픈스트리트맵에 추가하신 과속단속 카메라 정보를 OSM 표준에 맞게끔 수정했습니다.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5406359717

다음에 과속 카메라를 추가하실 때 참고가 되면 좋을 것 같습니다.
앞으로도 많은 기여 부탁드립니다!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
ChehrehBargi (2022-06-28 18:44:32+00:00): سلام
ضمن خسته نباشید، رسم شما برای بلوارها موضوعیت دارد. شکل صحیح را بعد از این یادداشت رسم می‌کنم...
لطفاً قبل از ویرایشهای این چنینی، حتماً روی چنج ست کاربر قبلی، علت تغییری که میدهید کامنت و یادداشت‌گذاری کنید تا مسئله به وضوح مشخص شود.
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:03:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_2066394 (2022-06-28 21:38:42+00:00): Wo der Metzger war, ist da aktuell Leerstand?