piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Farfetch'd (2022-03-27 21:24:10+00:00): Po pierwsze szkoła jako instytucja państwowa nie może być właścicielem terenu, a jedynie "dostać" teren w tzw zarząd trwały. Właścicielem działki na której znajduje się zabudowa szkolna jest gmina/miasto. Teren szkolnym czyli nie publicznym jest teren ogrodzony. Podsumowując WŁAŚCICIELEM działki jak i samego pomnika jest MIASTO/GMINA.
Jak pomnik może znajdować się na terenie szkoły, skoro szkoła nie jest właścicielem posesji na której się znajduje?
Kovoschiz (2022-04-01 11:33:20+00:00): Please don't quote irrelevant sources. This infringes copyright.
fotanboy (2022-04-01 15:52:40+00:00): you mean wiki? sorry about that
deuzeffe (2022-04-09 14:40:36+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans le groupe de modification https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118983588 vous avez effacé la relation 13365262 en pensant qu'elle était vide. Il s'agit d'une relation de TAD où seuls les points d'arrêt sont mentionnés.

Suivant quelle règle osm vous êtes-vous basé pour effectuer cette suppression ?

Bonne journée.
deuzeffe (2022-04-16 09:09:21+00:00): Bonjour,

Sans réponse au bout d'une semaine, je m'apprête à faire un revert de ce groupe de modification et à signaler le problème au DWG.

Bonne journée.
user_8101879 (2022-04-16 12:21:18+00:00): Bonjour,
une relatrion vide est une relation sans membre, la relation 13365262 n'a aucun membre (aucun point d'arrêt du TAD, voir l'historique https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13365262/history : elle a été créée vide et a toujours été vide) donc ne sert à rien.

Merci de lire la page wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Empty_relations pour plus de détails et essayer de comprendre pourquoi cette relation est vide (probablement lié à un bug JOSM, cf. cette fiche https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).
Je peux rétablir cette relation si vous souhaitez ensuite y rajouter les membres manquants (si vous savez faire) mais le plus simple serait de recréer une nouvelle relation avec les membres que vous vouliez y mettre (attention si vous utilisez à nouveau JOSM, même si le ticket JOSM a été fermé, un bug est toujours présent, cf. mes derniers commentaires sur cette page).
Cordialement.
deuzeffe (2022-04-16 13:13:45+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est moi qui ai créé cette relation, je sais très bien ce que j'ai fait, à tel point qu'elle est même référencée dans le wiki avec tous les points d'arrêts intégrés : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Communaut%C3%A9_urbaine_Limoges_M%C3%A9tropole/Transports_en_commun#Transport_.C3.A0_la_demande
Ce n'est pas la première fois que nous constatons un comportement inapproprié de votre part et un refus de vous conformer aux bon usage d'osm.
Donc, je reverte, et je signale au DWG.
deuzeffe (2022-04-16 13:14:59+00:00): Et je me passe volontiers de vos leçons de morale, surtout concernant les relations de Transport public.
user_8101879 (2022-04-20 22:26:52+00:00): Je vois que vous avez corrigé vos erreurs, bravo à vous.
Par contre votre agressivité est limite...
La bonne réponse était "ah oui, merci je n'avais pas vu ces erreurs".
Bonne journée
deuzeffe (2022-04-21 08:16:29+00:00): Vous auriez été beaucoup plus inspiré de regarder l'historique de la relation *avant* de la supprimer, de prendre conscience de sa date récente, de me contacter pour me demander si c'était normal qu'elle soit vide. Alors, là, j'aurais pu vous remercier d'avoir pointé l'oubli. C'est votre attitude qui est agressive : supprimer un objet sans contacter *avant* la personne qui l'a récemment créé. Ne vous étonnez donc pas de recevoir en retour la même chose. 
Et je me passe volontiers de vos félicitations condescendantes, condescendance qui transparaît de nombreuses fois dans l'historique de vos commentaires.
user_8101879 (2022-04-30 15:44:09+00:00): Je vois que vous progressez : vous admettez enfin que la relation était bien vide (cf. votre 1er commentaire qui disait le contraire).
Vous n'avez plus qu'à admettre que votre 1er commentaire était donc déplacé (puisque c'était le seul souci que vous souleviez concernant ce changeset) et tout sera rentré dans l'ordre.

Concernant les relations vides, vous pourriez aussi lire cela : https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2021-April/086462.html

Votre relation n'est pas la seule à avoir subi un nettoyage de masse lié principalement à un bug de JOSM : aucun des 66 000 utilisateurs ayant créé des relations vides n'a été contacté du fait de cette discussion qui autorise la suppression directe desdites relations.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-18 13:44:02+00:00): @Fred73000 - automatically deleting relations with no members (but with other valid tags) does not benefit OSM in any way.  If you see a problem, please contact the original mapper (politely!) explaining that they may have forgotten to add ways or relations to it, or have forgotten to delete it.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-18 13:44:32+00:00): @ Fred73000 - la suppression automatique des relations sans membres (mais avec d'autres balises valides) ne profite en aucun cas à OSM. Si vous voyez un problème, veuillez contacter le mappeur d'origine (poliment !) en expliquant qu'il a peut-être oublié d'y ajouter des chemins ou des relations, ou qu'il a oublié de le supprimer.
Cordialement,
Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail sur les données d'OSM.
user_8101879 (2022-06-21 13:19:02+00:00): Ok.

maybe you should delete the wiki page about empty relations and delete the talk about mass deletion of 66 000 deleted empty relations (deleted not by me) which users were not contacted : if you want to contact them all, just do it...
SomeoneElse (2022-06-21 13:28:52+00:00): @Fred73000 - it's a wiki; if you feel that it is important that a wiki page is not incorrect please update it.
user_8101879 (2022-06-21 13:30:40+00:00): Ok, to be more usefull, you could :
- ask to JOSM to fix their bug (they did nothing about this ticket https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/20781 + they gave a bad answer to this ticket https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825, bad because still too much empty relations created by their sofware
- or ask people who take care about osm to prevent, with the API, empty relations
SomeoneElse (2022-06-21 23:33:44+00:00): @Fred73000 - in the great scheme of things, empty relations (with or without tags) don't really matter.  They've got no components with any geometry, so no-one is going to encounter them by mistake when they are interacting with OSM data, unless they are explicitly looking for empty relations.
The response of the JOSM developers at https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/20781 and https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825 seems reasonable to me, including trying to understand what actually happened in some of the cases, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106596700 .
user_8101879 (2022-06-26 17:48:55+00:00): I'm not agree : a relation without tags is a bad data. I looked at 2000 relations without tags, I deleted 1800 relations because truly useless and fixed 200 others because of mistakes of users.
Same thing with empty relations even if mostly are bad datas, (I fixed not a lot of the 15000 I looked at).

I would prefer that JOSM blocks these relations before to send them in osm database and that users fixed themself their work rather than nobody cares or that someone has to look at all these bad datas to see if they are truly bad datas or could be fixed.
GinaroZ (2022-07-05 10:24:37+00:00): I've added the name back to be consistent with the other top up taps
saintam1 (2022-07-05 10:38:33+00:00): Sounds good! 👍
user_5359 (2022-03-28 13:11:07+00:00): Hello! Please use addr:full instead of full_addre.
mavl (2022-03-30 14:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-04-21 16:56:59+00:00): Hi, good job, but you can also use Maa-amet's imagery (our local land board). It's more recent than Esri and the promenade is complete there. There is also this https://fotoladu.maaamet.ee/?basemap=ofk&zlevel=15,24.76497,59.44790&overlay=tyhi (you can click and see aerial photographs from an angle) I've noticed you've accidentally deleted the stairs near the promenade beginning, I'm adding them back. 

Also, shouldn't the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044490748 building part's shape follow the promenade? Why does it have building:levels=0 ?
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-28 12:29:46+00:00): Why you deleted a road that starts here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1688401273#map=19/13.56556/-86.52676 ?
Nia-gara (2022-03-29 14:37:04+00:00): I don't know what happened. It looks like there was a conflict with the waterway nearby. The waterway and the road are sharing partially the same area (ford=yes). There are nodes from the waterway, but no lines. Strange...

Do you want to repair it or should I do it?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-29 14:45:59+00:00): please, do it :D
Northfork (2022-03-29 15:29:44+00:00): Corrected! Thanks for telling me and have a great day!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-27 16:33:15+00:00): Good work!
Carto'Cité (2022-07-18 11:18:42+00:00): Bonjour Patrick,
Je me suis permis de modifier ce chemin (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044492765) de  highway=footway + surface=gravel à highway=path + segregated=no + surface=ground. Je pense que c'est plus juste. N'hésite pas à me questionner si tu as des questions ou des remarques.
À bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 19:00:45+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9610991628/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
habi (2022-03-31 07:48:38+00:00): Ciao o639
Da 'review requested' hier mein Senf dazu: Du hast hier die Post (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/322109143) gelöscht, existiert diese denn nicht mehr?
Gruess us Bärn,
habi
o639 (2022-03-31 09:22:50+00:00): Nein, diese Filiale wurde schon vor einigen Jahren geschlossen, die ist nun im Spar gegenüber integriert.
habi (2022-03-31 14:36:45+00:00): Super, mersi für die Info.
Ich habe die Informationen vom Spar so angepasst.
Supaplex (2022-03-28 03:43:55+00:00): Hi BohdanUA,

It seems that you change the disrupted territory and broke the boundary relation. Please be aware that OpenStreetMap data are used by big and small companies and organizations. And edit that broke things will be fixed very soon.

Data Working Group
Dennis Raylin Chen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118985653
BohdanUA (2022-03-28 09:28:23+00:00): Hello, explain in detail whose territory it is and what I am violating?
BohdanUA (2022-03-28 09:33:19+00:00): As far as I know, the OSM team maintains neutrality on the territory of Crimea, but for some reason it now says that this is the territory of Russia, which contradicts their side, who can explain it to me?
My position is either that this is the territory of Ukraine or adhere to neutrality. Then on the administrative borders of Crimea there is no sign of the country, except for the comment that it is the Autonomous Republic of Crimea
eggie (2022-03-27 15:53:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip....  Probeer de wegen vij te houden van de landuse.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-03-27 16:02:16+00:00): Ahh  .. te snel gekeken. Het ligt keurig los.

Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-27 16:07:32+00:00): Het wandelpad heb ik wel even doorverbonden met die highway=service.. Het zal helaas niet routeren, want dat achterom vanaf de Nolenslaan staat op slot voor iedereen door access=private . Mag je daar niet wandelen?
Tdleeuw (2022-03-27 17:28:28+00:00): Volgens het bestemmingsplan (https://www.ruimtelijkeplannen.nl/documents/NL.IMRO.00140000450PCPCoendersb-/p_NL.IMRO.00140000450PCPCoendersb-.pdf) zitten de wandelpaden binnen 'W-1', het woongebied, vanaf de rand van de huizen. Waarschijnlijk zit die highway=service daarom ook als access=private na de huisrand. Als we die conventie volgen, zijn de wandelpaden ook access=private na de huisrand
eggie (2022-03-27 17:44:12+00:00): Oke.. up to you als lokale mapper 
Veel plezier met mappen
Gr eggie
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-13 06:25:14+00:00): Hi GMdika. Your edit looks awesome,  but I suggest you to split highway (id 1044496691) and change tag to bridge due crossing with water body (id 1047842697). If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142907180). Thank you.
user_1566574 (2024-04-08 14:57:51+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai eu un peu de mal à faire coller vos modifications concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044497398 à la réalité, mais ça s'en rapproche. Par curiosité, avez-vous été sur ce chemin en personne ?

Merci d'avance ! :)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 00:53:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 118419157, 118419165, 118419167, 118419172, 118419175, 118419181, 118437604, 118437610, 118437616, 118437622, 118437631, 118437646, 118437658, 118437665, 118437671, 118437681, 118437685, 118437692, 118437700, 118438293, 118438303, 118438310, 118438322, 118438340.
Udarian (2022-03-27 15:46:50+00:00): also fixed some grass
Chincha1 (2022-05-14 12:19:29+00:00): No proof in adding lane information please provide the proper resource
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118986266
janolezab (2022-05-14 13:57:53+00:00): Hey Chincha1, as the source is "survey", it can be verified on the ground.

Bing imagery is good enough to verify too, at least mostly.

Does that answer your question?
janolezab (2022-06-03 17:09:08+00:00): Hi Chincha1, is there any remaining question?
mariotomo (2022-03-27 17:37:07+00:00): hola y que recibas la bienvenida a OSM! hay una pequeña comunidad panameña, y por supuesto una enorme comunidad internacional para que encuentres la manera mejor de apoyar OSM. con gusto mejoraría tu contribución, pero no veo qué es lo que mapeaste.
tbritton (2022-03-27 18:18:15+00:00): Gracias!!! Es un estimado del lote, o lo que en el futuro sería la casa designada por ese número. Como notarás casi nada aparece en el mapa más allá de las calles. De hecho atrás hay un parque público y un estacionamiento también público dentro del complejo. A medida que visite y entienda mejor los linderos, quiero quiero ir mapeando más cosas, como el estacionamiento y el parque.
tbritton (2022-03-27 18:18:30+00:00): La comunidad tiene algún foro?
mariotomo (2022-03-27 19:26:07+00:00): grupo no oficial, algo más activo que el foro, y para asuntos más efímeros: https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama

foro hospedado por OSM: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
mariotomo (2022-03-27 23:16:58+00:00): welcome to the group!
about the tagging: we should tag things as they are, not as intended or planned. so this isn't yet a building and the building will not be as large as the whole lot. mapping the current landuse (park? parking?) would be quite useful, even if the precise extension can't be established as yet.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 15:22:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9611039263/history - have you maybe wanted to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Delectronics ?
pio2_122 (2022-03-27 17:18:58+00:00): Zauważyłem, że w OSM informacje odnośnie liczby ludności miast, wsi, itd. przeważnie były/są dodawane do punktów z tagiem place=*,a nie relacji granic tych miejscowości.
Po tej edycji, liczba ludności dodana do relacji nie pokrywa się z liczbą dodaną do punktu z place=town.

Mógłbyś więc poprawić sposób dodawania tych danych? Moim zdaniem, aby nie robić "rewolucji" w sposobie tagowania i nie dublować danych, najlepiej by było tylko przenieść je z relacji do punktów.
NieWnen (2022-03-27 18:18:27+00:00): @pio2_122
Lepiej ustalić to na forum, podrzucam post:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75218
pio2_122 (2022-03-28 16:29:52+00:00): Jasne, opisałem sytuację we wspomnianym wątku: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=859100#p859100
ivanbranco (2022-03-29 17:16:27+00:00): Ciao VincB,

benvenuto su OSM e grazie per le modifiche :)

Ho degli appunti su questo changeset però:
wheelchair=designated indica qualcosa creato appositamente per gente con disabilità (es. un'entrata o un ascensore destinato unicamente a loro), so di scuole per sordomuti ecc. ma dubito questa particolare scuola sia stata creata per utenti con disabilità, piu' probabilmente volevi utilizzare wheelchair=yes

Hai creato una scuola dentro a una scuola. "Itas Trentin Agrario" e "Istituto Agrario D. Sartor" sono la stessa cosa o due cose differenti?

Ultima ma piu' importante: Google Maps non è una fonte utilizzabile in nessun caso.

Resto disponibile se hai dubbi o domande
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:47:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
ALu68 (2022-04-02 07:41:20+00:00): Hello Mark K Smith,

Name is the name only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

E.g. "building=ruins" without "(ruins)" in the name:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044504522
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1044504518

Regards. Andre
wkdgs (2022-03-28 12:07:21+00:00): Hi,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich versuche mal ein paar Tipps für das Mapping zu geben:

* Es fehlt ein Tag, der beschreibt um was für einen Punkt es sich handelt. Das kann man im ID-Editor festlegen, indem man auf den obersten Button drückt und dort z.B. "Fotograf/in" auswählt. Oder indem man den Tag direkt hinzufügt. Also z.B. "craft=photographer".
* Der Tag "name:en" ist eine Übersetzung von "name" ins Englische. Hier fehlt also "Mike Bielski".
* Der Tag "note" ist eher für andere Mapper gedacht. Für eine zusätzliche Beschreibung, die man nicht durch andere Tags ausdrücke kann, ist der "description"-Tag ("Beschreibung" im ID-Editor) gedacht. Hier sollte allerdings keine Werbung drin stehen.
* Um eine Webseite anzugeben, kann man den "website"-Tag verwenden ("Webseite" im ID-Editor).
* Der Punkt liegt aktuell außerhalb des Gebäudes. Er sollte aber in das Gebäude in die Nähe des zugehörigen Einganges gesetzt werden.
* Auch, wenn das Gebäude bereits eine Adresse hat, kann man auch am Punkt selbst nochmal die Adresse mit Hilfe der "addr"-Tags eintragen.

Eine hilfreiche Quelle zum Mappen ist das OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Da kannst du dir anschauen wofür, welche Tags verwendet werden. Das Wiki erreicht man auch über den i-Button im ID-Editor. Oder einfach nach "osm wiki ..." suchen.

Gruß
winkeldings
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:47:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
John Gilmore (2022-03-27 20:55:17+00:00): Thank you for fixing that, Kevin!
mavl (2022-03-30 14:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
Antissimo (2022-11-04 10:33:23+00:00): Kedves nargoth, elnézést, hogy egy 7 hónappal ezelőtti szerkesztés miatt írok, de most botlottam bele. Csak azt szeretném tisztázni, hogy a "bicycle_road" nem kerékpárutat, hanem kerékpáros utcát jelent, ami egy Magyarországon még nem létező kategória. Elég a "highway=cycleway". Köszönöm!
nargoth (2022-11-04 21:53:09+00:00): Köszönöm szépen, figyelek rá!
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].
mavl (2022-03-30 14:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119119100 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119027789].