piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2019-02-17 21:10:26+00:00): Hej, asi by mal byt z oboch stran od Karadzicovej, ked budu vychadzat autobusy od AS. Skusim to tam osobne pozriet a doladim to. Dakujem
mapko (2019-02-19 18:17:36+00:00): Zabudol som vcera odpisat. Prave odbocenie na Karadzicovu je vedena mimo semafor. Asi bude potrebne doplnil cestu a prehodit na tam všetku MHD. Cez iD je to komplikovane, tak to nebudem robit...
aceman444 (2019-02-19 18:58:18+00:00): Ano, dnes som tam bol a videl som to. Idem teda porobit plno detailov.
literan (2019-02-16 11:11:25+00:00): вы тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2908431196#map=19/55.71964/37.60927&layers=N удалили тег пешеходного перехода. Вернул.
RFuser11 (2019-02-18 08:46:25+00:00): да, случайно вышло, когда тег светофора накладывал
A67-A67 (2019-02-15 22:39:42+00:00): Please don't replace widely used tags for undocumented 'made-up' tags like rollercoaster=track.
As long as the rollercoaster key isn't commonly used, the railway key is at least needed for compatibility. 
The results of your changeset are already visible: the rollercoasters are disappearing from all common map styles...
A67-A67 (2019-02-15 22:44:00+00:00): I restored the railway-tags for compatibility and added your tag rollercoaster=track to the rollercoaster parts that you missed.
Nehaj (2019-02-16 22:34:20+00:00): Hi A67-A67,

roller coasters are not railways. I understand the problem of a missing official tag. But misusing a tag for a very different feature (railways) is much more 'made-up' than using a correct tag: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/roller_coaster=track

Kind regards
A67-A67 (2019-02-17 02:41:44+00:00): Hi Nehaj,

A feature can have multiple keys. So we could just keep the railway-key next to the rollercoaster-key until the rollercoaster-key is supported.

Besides, it is better when you first discuss these kind of edits with the local OSM-community at https://forum.osm.org/viewforum.php?id=12
marczoutendijk (2019-07-16 08:12:05+00:00): In this same changeset the "place=locality" tagging was replaced by "place=leisure" which is completely wrong. The key "place" is used to mark a geographical location with a known name, not the function of something. Please check the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place.
Those two occurences of this wrong tagging, were the only two in taginfo!
I changed them back to "locality"
nevw (2019-02-15 23:56:35+00:00): Hi Mark
This is a public map. Were you intending to put what looks like private info on it?
nevw (2019-02-16 07:43:14+00:00): no response, deleted personal info and shifted to correct location.
Владимир К (2020-09-17 08:32:39+00:00): что это за водоемы?
jcarlson (2019-02-15 22:35:16+00:00): crap. forgot to change the changeset comment...
Die immer lacht (2019-02-17 20:13:48+00:00): Uwe, war das so wirklich Absicht?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67241358
streckenkundler (2019-02-17 20:33:39+00:00): Ich schätze nein... in den letzten Wochen beobachte ich vermehrt, daß iD dem User unheimlichen MP-Schrott unterjubelt...
pbrideau (2019-02-21 15:14:40+00:00): Pourquoi avoir effacé la route d'été du sentier des cimes? (route=hiking)
jfd553 (2019-02-21 16:21:06+00:00): Ca me semblait une duplication de la relation 9263447 qui décrivait déjà le sentier des Cimes.
pbrideau (2019-02-21 16:26:27+00:00): En fait, si je ne me trompe pas, les route=piste ce sont les sentiers d'hiver (piste:type=hike étant la raquette), et les route=hiking sont les sentiers d'été.  Ce n'était donc pas une duplication.
pbrideau (2019-02-21 16:31:20+00:00): Devrais-je les indiquer autrement?  Par exemple mettre (été) ou (hiver) à la fin du nom?
jfd553 (2019-02-22 00:52:39+00:00): Je vérifie et te reviens la dessus...
jfd553 (2019-02-22 18:29:09+00:00): Heureusement, le tagging dans OSM n’est pas toujours aussi complexe! Après de nombreuses lectures, je conclus que la relation que j’ai détruite était valide (désolé). Cependant, après avoir lu la réponse à la question suivante:

https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/32084

Je propose plutôt d’utiliser la relation route=hiking qui est toujours en place (que tu as créée) et d’y ajouter le tag piste:type=showshoes, puisque le tag piste:type est spécifiquement utilisé pour ce genre de situation, sans avoir à créer une nouvelle relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:piste:type)
pbrideau (2019-02-22 18:42:11+00:00): Super, je croyais bêtement que le tag piste:* devait être uniquement utilisé avec route=piste.  Merci de la précision!

Par contre, le wiki de key:piste:type suggère plutôt le tag piste:type=hike et piste:grooming=backcountry pour la raquette.  Le tag piste:type=snowshoe ne semble pas exister.

Je vais corriger les autres duplicata que j'ai introduit récemment.  Merci!
jfd553 (2019-02-22 19:30:11+00:00): Pour le tag piste:grooming=backcountry, il s’agit plus tag décrivant la préparation de la piste (surtout pour le ski) que son utilisation... 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:piste:grooming
pbrideau (2019-02-22 20:00:11+00:00): En effet, mais justement c'est un sentier de randonnée (piste:type=hike) et non préparé (piste:grooming=backcountry) non?  C'est pas mal textuel d'utiliser grooming dans le wiki pour la raquette:

Extrait du wiki piste:type=hike
```
A piste for nordic walking or hiking in winter (Winterwanderweg) that is usually announced by a tourism authority. A classic groomed piste (piste:grooming=classic) can be hiked with simple boots or can be used for running (default if grooming is absent). A piste:grooming=backcountry groomed piste requires snow shoes.
```
jfd553 (2019-02-22 20:12:19+00:00): Je comprends ton point de vue. Personnellement, backcountry devrait être la valeur par défaut pour hike, non pas classic. Mais si tu préfères appliquer la règle telle qu’elle apparait dans le wiki, je ne m’y opposerai pas :-)
pbrideau (2019-02-22 20:14:18+00:00): haha :-) Merci de ton feedback!
pbrideau (2019-02-24 21:46:40+00:00): Bon, le rendu tel que discuté ne fonctionne pas sur le site de Waymarked Trails: https://slopes.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14!45.4727!-71.1833

Je vais essayer de les contacter pour avoir leur feedback.
pbrideau (2019-02-24 22:13:03+00:00): Pour référence, j'ai ouvert un billet sur le github : https://github.com/waymarkedtrails/waymarked-trails-site/issues/309
pbrideau (2019-02-26 00:08:50+00:00): WaymarkedTrails recommandent d'utiliser une route 'multi-purpose' en utilisant le point-virgue, ce qui a bien du sens:

`route='hiking;piste'`

L'utilisation du point-virgule semble controversée par contre:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator

Quelle est ton opinion sur cette solution?
jfd553 (2019-02-26 13:54:31+00:00): Y'en a pas de facile !-) 
Waymarked accepte les '';'' mais le wiki conclut que c'est une exception. Le sentier est décrit par des tags unique (highway=footway, name=Sentier des Cimes, ...), ce qui répond aux considérations du wiki.  Comme les relations sont peu utilisées, et comme  Waymarked accepte les '';'' dans les tags de relations, je n'aurais pas trop d'hésitation à utiliser le '';''

La règle d'or demeure cependant ... ''keeping it simple'' !
pbrideau (2019-02-26 23:50:01+00:00): En effet.  J'ai également commencé à corriger des dupplications entre ski nordique et raquette que j'ai fait dans d'autres parcs avec le tag piste:type=hike;nordic
marc__marc (2020-01-24 00:32:07+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194300601
what's this ? a tourism area where ppl send leisure time ? that look like to be a amenity=parking_space for car and caravans.
I also find strange that a area inside a parking get its own addr:housenumber. it'sn't the same for the whole parking ?
Regards,
Marc
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-22 03:35:16+00:00): Reverted by DWG for adding fictitious or duplicated information: changeset/135214744
mueschel (2019-02-16 10:36:34+00:00): This import (again) created a large number of tags that shouldn't be in OSM: "telenav:action=new"

Please take the time to check your data before uploading!
LSkalayo_import (2019-02-18 22:46:58+00:00): We are working hard to help our editors with this common mistake and ensure that it will stop happening. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
CRCulver (2019-05-14 20:49:55+00:00): Please do not create nodes with shop=mobile_phone to tell people where they can get mobile phone signals. That is not what this tag is for.
viloan (2019-02-15 23:06:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-02-15 23:12:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-02-16 07:32:27+00:00): Dag Maiic.. Je vraagt om een review. Het is correct als het inderdaad om een fast_food gaat. Probeer in je commentaar aan te geven wat je doet.. dus "fast_food restaurant toegevoegd."
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-16 07:33:50+00:00): Zou prima kunnen.. Je commentaar is dan playground toegevoegd.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-02-16 07:36:38+00:00): review.. Voor auto's routeert het hier niet naar dat parkeerplaatsje.
Denk dus highway=service ipv path
BGr Eggie
mueschel (2019-02-16 10:35:05+00:00): Hi,
you added many building with strange tags. These tags are not used in any other place. Please have a look and change them to common, documented tags. 

    KEY=uuid:e0c123eb-fb5b-4aac-9655-79ec788587bc
    z_releve=bati_existant
    zone=Ndiolofène Sud_093
eggie (2019-02-16 07:41:42+00:00): Wel nog even De Piramide op het gebouw leggen.
Maak je wel gebruik van de al bestaande adresnodes?
7a ligt op het gebouw. Je zou daar op moeten bijtaggen.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-02-16 07:44:33+00:00): Piramide samengevoegd met BAG adresnode
eggie (2019-02-16 07:45:43+00:00): Dit klopt beter denk ik.
BrackoNe (2021-04-22 10:06:45+00:00): Ćao Aleksa! Nadam se da si dobro u ovim kriznim vremenima.

Hteo sam da te pitam, da li je oblik (shape) Kule Beograd dobar, jer mi se čini da je prevelik i da je oblik drugačiji. Molim te ako možeš da proveriš još jednom, bio bih ti zahvalan.

way id: 670824807.

Sve najbolje,
Nemanja
Aleksa M (2021-04-22 10:37:36+00:00): Hvala na pitanju, jesam, takođe. Ja sam crtao kulu po osnovi koju sam našao na linku https://www.b92.net/news/pics/2016/04/15/9200280055711296cb95de620707212_orig.jpg. Desna (na crtežu) "polovina" te osnove je kula sa 42 sprata, dok je leva "polovina" dvospratni (ako se ne varam) lobi koji su nedavno počeli da grade (bela montažna konstrukcija na slici https://i.imgur.com/85zvKI2.jpg). Te dve polovine bi trebalo sad dodatno da se označe building:part tagovima pošto su deo iste zgrade, ali različite su spratnosti. Što se tiče veličine, moguće da sam pogrešio, ali sam ja u JOSM-u kalibrisao crtež osnove prema satelitskom snimku najpribližnije moguće.

Pozdrav,
Aleksa
BrackoNe (2021-04-22 11:27:12+00:00): Mislim da je razmera u redu, siguran sam da me bunila ta druga polovina crteža. Tako da, ukoliko je moguće da te zamolim ili da uradiš sa building partovima, ili da razdvojiš na dva zasebna objekta.

Ponovo ti hvala na brzim odgvorima,
Nemanja
Aleksa M (2021-04-22 11:31:35+00:00): Uradiću sa building partovima. Nema na čemu!
BrackoNe (2021-04-22 12:51:04+00:00): Sjajno! Hvala još jednom!
MKnight (2019-02-16 09:52:19+00:00): Moin,
sieht sehr gut aus.

Ich habe 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72538293
korrigiert.
eggie (2019-02-16 07:54:28+00:00): Deze tag wordt afgeraden https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=wadi?uselang=nl

en hoort denk ik niet op de oevers ergens in Brabant.
Er zijn wel andere tags voor opvangmogelijkheden  zoals intermittent=yes, maar dat zet je op het water zelf. 
retentiebekken bestaan ook, maar die liggen vaak helemaal droog en er is dan geen water in de buurt. Dat wordt dan gestreept gerenderd.
eggie (2019-02-16 08:51:59+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #67248512
eggie (2019-02-16 08:06:23+00:00): Denk niet dat het correct is. Ben zelfs benieuwd hoe het straks rendert. Ik zie dat het nog oorspronkelijk allemaal mijn eigen tagging is geweest.
Ook hier geldt waterway=wadi is afgekeurd.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=wadi?uselang=nl
Even in de gaten houden svp.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-02-16 08:08:04+00:00): .. en waterway=wadi wordt niet op landuse elementen geplaatst
eggie (2019-02-16 08:24:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dbasin
landuse=basin
basin=retention
intermittend=yes
Maar dan zou ik niet ale landuse doen. Het is ook net een ingewikkeld stuk, want het is een multipolygoon relaties.
Je zou dan alleen de verbindingen moeten intekenen tussen wat nu al water is en die opnemen in de mp. De basins mogen de natural=water ook niet raken, want dan moet je het ook weer heel anders aanpakken. Het kan wel.
Ik draai de laatste twee changesets terug conform advies wikipagina met waterway=wadi.
eggie (2019-02-16 08:51:11+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #67248503
eggie (2019-02-16 08:59:27+00:00): Even een stukje landuse basin ingetekend ter hoogte van nr 61
abakus_uploader (2019-02-16 23:31:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ArnaudJ59 (2019-02-17 14:58:32+00:00): Bonjour,
Comme évoqué sur un autre groupe de modifications, je constate la suppression de plusieurs zones d'attente de bus pourtant validées récemment par arpentage.
Par exemple (parmi beaucoup d'autres) :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2984742468/history
Pourriez-vous justifier ces suppressions ?
Merci d'avance
aharvey (2019-10-03 04:29:14+00:00): If you check the history of https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/179207161 it looks like you've incorrectly removed the oneway tag, which was then fixed by someone else, and then you removed again, and it was fixed again.

Was this a mistake or intentional?
chazanov (2019-02-16 01:22:19+00:00): Hi BigTuna907,
where are you / is Salesforce EMEA located?
rab (2019-02-16 08:53:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67248408
landuse residential removed
some residential highways removed (these are only short private driveways). A track connected and extended.
Владимир К (2019-03-12 15:26:30+00:00): Что же вы делаете? Не поверю ни за что, что у проспекта может быть access=permissive. А для bicycle=yes необходимо наличие знаков/разметки велодорожек. Это не просто возможность проехать на этом транспорте. Это теги про легальность доступа. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access Ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, прежде чем продолжать
freebeer (2019-05-13 21:54:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70210387 where the changeset comment is: fake maps.me bogus home castles with personal info
Jimmy K 99 (2019-02-16 15:15:29+00:00): Was the improper highway link a turn lane on South Main Street on the west edge of your edit? 

If so, it looks like that should've been removed. Only protected and isolated turn lanes (usually with barriers) should have their own dedicated way path.
S-zation (2019-02-16 23:27:50+00:00): Correct, it was the left turn lane at the Amstel Ave/South Main St intersection.

Something like that should be represented by turn:lanes=* tags (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn).
Jimmy K 99 (2019-02-17 18:04:43+00:00): Perfect, thank you. Just clarifying.
Warin61 (2019-02-17 22:15:45+00:00): Hi,

This has placed the same tags on the outer way as there is in the relation ...not allowed.

---------------------
I would also add the tag landcover=grass as well as that ridiculous tag landuse=grass.
nevw (2019-02-18 04:30:50+00:00): I think these outer way tags are fixed now. Will check later.
--------------------
I am not a big fan of landuse=grass.
I will add the landcover tags too and later when it renders I will delete the landuse=grass tags.
ioanam_telenav (2019-04-12 09:23:48+00:00): Does the bridge on way 670855545 has its own name? Isn't also Atlas Road?
Delta 6 (2019-04-12 21:30:09+00:00): According to the EBRPD map (https://www.ebparks.org/images/Parks/PtPinole/Point-Pinole-map-2250w-20180726.gif) the bridge is called "Atlas Road Bridge". Maybe this should just be considered more of a label than a name; I interpreted it as a name, but I wouldn't have any reservations if the name of the bridge was changed to simple be "Atlas Road".
下り専門 (2019-02-16 07:27:39+00:00): こんにちは。このエリアのBing衛星写真にはズレがあります。GPSログにより国土地理院 電子国土基本図が実際に近いことを確認していますので位置合わせは国土地理院 電子国土基本図にお願いします。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67246400
mbethke (2019-02-19 02:30:53+00:00): Hi,
ich habe die beiden gleichnamigen POIs mal in einen craf=handicraft gemergt. Country Code für Laos ist übrigens +856
servus,
Matthias
Your Village Maps (2019-04-24 06:14:28+00:00): Why was my work on Portico Condominium replaced by DRCOG imported data?  I spent a lot of time working on the buildings in this area, adding building parts and their heights or levels.
samuelestabrook_imports (2019-04-24 15:47:03+00:00): Hi Your Village Maps,
Thank you for your comment. My apologies, at the time it seemed to me a viable update of the geometry based on imagery. Now reviewing the original changeset (22478948) I understand better the choices you made while mapping the space. I will revert the modify:geometry of w283549369 and deletion of w542181756 and be more aware of your work in the future. Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-02-24 09:16:08+00:00): Please, use changeset comments describing what is changed and why (it is OK to do it in your preferred language, English is not necessary)
SomeoneElse (2019-02-16 22:04:32+00:00): Hello Georgian Travel Guide,
You've changed the name here from the name:os version to the name:ka one.Could you explain why that is?
Best Regards,
Andy
Georgian Travel Guide (2019-02-18 07:10:04+00:00): The name is display in different language. Marked region is the part of Georgia, however the names on the map are not display in Georgian. Could you advice how to change the display language accordingly?
SomeoneElse (2019-02-18 13:27:08+00:00): That district is part of South Ossetia, which is de jure part of Georgia but de facto a self-declared and largely internationally unrecognised republic.  However, the legal status doesn't have any bearing on the language used in names.  Many places have names where the local population uses a name in one language but that language doesn't match the official language of an enclosing state.  If the majority of people here speak an Ossetian rather than a Georgian language I'd expect the "name" field to reflect that.  Some communities in OSM use "/" or "-" separators and include multiple languages in the "name" field (see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1635651356 ).
Are you saying that the majority of people in this part of South Ossetia speak Georgian rather than Ossetian?
aixbrick (2019-02-17 13:56:32+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier die stop_position verschoben, wodurch der Straßenverlauf nicht mehr passte. Ich habe den Changeset rückgängig gemacht und die Haltestellenposition korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67280117.
Gruß
aixbrick (2019-02-17 13:58:06+00:00): Hallo,
die gelöschte platform habe ich mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67280117 wiederhergestellt und an die neue Position verschoben.
Gruß
BCNorwich (2019-02-16 11:09:23+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Pretty good for a first attempt. It's always good to look at how similar features have been mapped to decide how to proceed. Or indeed read up on guidelines. 

Anyway I've made a few corrections to the houses you added so you can see what is needed. Each house must be a complete polygon (a single line enclosing the feature and making a circuit, last node joined to the first one).  A feature just tagged as area=yes will not be rendered. A house is tagged building=house, area tag is not needed. Building look neater more professional if squared up.

I've corrected your two changesets so they are OK now. If you need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
woodpeck (2019-03-08 20:28:16+00:00): Hello DingoKG, in this changeset you have accidentally used a description ("correct name") that does not match your actual edit (adding a street).

You're making very many edits in diverse locations - edits that cannot come from aerial imagery. So, are you actually travelling to all these places to map, or what is your data source? It would be good if you could specify a source when uploading changes. Thank you!
woodpeck (2019-03-08 20:31:58+00:00): It occurs to me that many Kaart Group mappers use the suffix "KG" in their user name. If you have a business or employment relationship with Kaart Group, please document this relationship in your user profile.
DingoKG (2019-03-12 12:50:24+00:00): Dingo is my nickname then added KG 
which I coined 8 years ago so no relation to Kaart Group, I heard of it the first time from you. In regards to my data source(s), I live in Kenya and travel a lot around the country.I take pictures with my phone of places I want to edit/not on Openstreet since I already have open street on my phone for GPS Navigation. Then using the aerial imagery it becomes very easy and precise to add a missing link or place. Then after the edit on OSM I use my phone physically to see whether my edits are correct and accurate.  Hence the many diverse edits. Also I've just edited Kenya alone since that's where I live and move around.
DingoKG (2019-03-12 13:04:34+00:00): I'm very sorry for the delay in reply to your comment/concern. Kindly pardon my indiscipline. Apologies too for also not indicating my map data source which as per my previous explanation would fall under "local knowledge" from this documentation==>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
All my future edits will be tagged with correct data source. Thank you.