piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MikeN (2015-08-26 01:46:02+00:00): 
That area does not meet the definition of 'unclassified' in the Wiki, nor its common usage in North America (Roughly equivalent to 'residential' but without residences).   Specifically it is no longer a public road, it is all on private land.  I researched the public record before deleting it originally.  Please take a look at the road today and see how you would classify it - 

https://www.flickr.com/photos/43161130@N05/albums/72157657343510889/with/20885800705/

There is no smooth entrance onto the former surface from the parking lot https://www.flickr.com/photos/43161130@N05/20885800705/in/album-72157657343510889/

The asphalt has all been removed, and only sand, gravel, grass, and weeds remain.

While I suppose a 'motor car' could still pass, it would generally only be passable by a maintenance vehicle with plenty of ground clearance.
karitotp (2015-08-26 14:08:47+00:00): thanks for the link , you are right according to the images that you sent me  and the street classification corresponds more to be a highway = track .
I am going to change the tag to a highway=track.
fangly (2015-08-24 15:20:54+00:00): The changeset comment should read: added some houses and benches based on Bing imagery and GPS traces.
lsces (2015-08-26 22:08:33+00:00): c1995 .. we prefer NOT to delete existing ways when making changes. There is a problem with accessing past history if that data is removed, and so we have lost the history on the Debenhams building now.
RobJN (2015-08-26 22:57:56+00:00): Hi c1995. I'm not sure if Lester also wrote to you via the Inbox system, but if not then let me say welcome to OpenStreetMap. Everyone finds it a bit tricky to do their first edit to the map so making mistakes is not unusual. It's also not to difficult to revert a change if necessary so don't worry about it :-) There are a number of good online guides and we have a local group if you are having trouble ( see www.mappa-mercia.org/contact ). Welcome :-)
Nakaner (2015-08-28 08:25:29+00:00): Das foot=yes und bicycle=yes, das du in diesem Changeset vergeben hast, sind überflüssig. Bitte lies dir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access durch.

Dein Changeset-Kommentar entspricht nicht der Realität.
changchun_1 (2015-08-28 11:29:03+00:00): Sehe ich genauso! Wollte ich gerade auch an einem anderen changeset schreiben.
Nakaner (2015-08-28 08:23:10+00:00): Auch für diesen Änderungssatz gilt: Der Changeset-Kommentar entspricht nicht der Wahrheit.
changchun_1 (2015-08-28 11:39:50+00:00): Fraglich ist ob die Namen stimmen die vergeben wurden.
Hjart (2015-08-27 11:19:01+00:00): Det ser ud til at det på en eller anden er lykkedes dig at lave en masse dubletter af både veje og noder i det her rettesæt
rasmusv (2015-08-27 11:22:17+00:00): :/. Changesættet er ikke så stort og indeholder ikke væsentlige rettelser. Kan du ikke bare reverte det hele?
Hjart (2015-08-27 11:26:27+00:00): Det kunne jeg have gjort. På OSMI er der flere blå streger i området og jeg kørte bare JOSM's validator over det og uploadede så
pnorman (2015-08-25 07:47:59+00:00): Hello,

This appears to be an undiscussed import. Imports in OSM need to follow wiki.osm.org/Import/Guidelines, which include consulting with imports@ and the local community.

There appear to be tagging problems with the data, as none of the nodes have normal OSM tags, and the changeset does not have a created_by tag.
dolphinling (2015-08-25 08:26:41+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding this data!

Based on your user name, it looks like you're adding this information on behalf of a client, is that right?

In OSM, we have a number of conventions for how data is entered. Keeping things consistent makes the data searchable and makes it so people can build applications that use the data usefully.

One important convention is that things are given a tag that describes what they are. For example, a shoe store would be given the tag shop=shoes (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dshoes), or a restaurant would be given the tag amenity=restaurant (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=restaurant). Doing this lets people do searches like "what are the restaurants in my area?".

For Casella, it looks like an appropriate tag might be amenity=waste_transfer_station (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_transfer_station). However, if these (or some of these) aren't waste transfer stations but just offices, the tag office=company might be appropriate.

Another important thing is to use the same tag as other people use for a given type of data. Here, you've set "Main Phone=207-561-6289", but the convention in OSM is to use "phone=207-561-6289". Using the same tag as everyone else makes the phone number usable in applications--for example, my phone's GPS would let me call the store directly.

Another case where using the same convention as everyone else would help is for hours. If you follow the convention set at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours, software (again, including GPS) will be able to let someone know if a place is currently open. Similarly, there's a convention for setting addresses on things, which can be seen at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr.

A very important one: everything in OSM uses the tag "name" to set something's name. That's all lowercase! Using the uppercase "Name" means it won't be searchable!

If you have any questions there are a whole bunch of ways to get help. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_contribute lists a lot of them. Hope this helps!
pnorman (2015-08-25 08:42:00+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33563681
R0bst3r (2016-01-24 18:57:14+00:00): There are a lot of similar imports. Can someone contact the Data Working Group to revert all this imports?
R0bst3r (2016-01-24 18:58:39+00:00): Oh, just see DWG is reverting.
maraf24 (2016-01-08 07:36:01+00:00): Co to jest i dlaczego wchodzi na budynki w Niewiadomej?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367288458
andrepi (2015-08-24 18:50:24+00:00): Added WIFI.
user_18305684 (2023-03-08 14:59:27+00:00): Hi,

for your information, I changed your unconventional value to a more common one with a description.

Best regards
andrewpmk (2015-08-24 18:40:12+00:00): Please remember to add religion and denomination to churches. I have fixed this
Hjart (2015-08-24 20:34:49+00:00): Det kan være en god ide når man laver ensrettede ben ved et kryds at klippe de eksisterende veje således at de bibeholder historikken og kun de nye ben fremtræder som helt nye.
Hjart (2015-08-24 20:35:26+00:00): Her tænker jeg specielt på eksemplet med Vindingvej
AkageMuk (2015-08-25 07:30:30+00:00): Sveiks, Raptorfen! OpenStreetMap projekts ir starptautiskā atvērto datu ģeogrāfiskā datu bāze nevis jebko zīmēšanā kartē. Ir arī noteiktas prasības pēc datiem un to kvalitāti.  "Gopu laukums" nav tāds pats plāši pazīstams un oficiāli lietots apvidus nosaukums kā "Ziedoņdārzs" vai "Esplanāde". Ja jums patīk iezīmēt jautrus nosaukumus kartē, tad labāk izmantot wikimapia.org, kur prasības ir vienkāršākas.

Добрый день. Проект OpenStreetMap это географическая база открытых данных, поэтому есть требования к качеству данных, которое предъявляет сообщество. Тег "name" предполагает использование официальных или общеизвестных исторических названий, а не того, как пару человек эту местность зовут между собой.
streckenkundler (2015-08-24 19:33:20+00:00): Hallo,

ich muß die Sinnhaftigkeit dieses Changesets und der folgenden hinterfragen. Die Wege: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243764505
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367285657
heißen unter garantie nicht "no" 

Auch der Weg: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367294935

heißt unter garantie nicht "Potsdamer Straße"

Sollte das ein Bedien- oder Anwendungsfehler des Editorws sein teile es mit bitte mit. Ich bin gerne bereit, dich bei der Fehlerbehebung zu unterstützen.

Sven
tabris (2015-12-22 18:02:06+00:00): Hallo interhorn,
ich habe gerade gesehen das du mit diesem Changeset Geh- und Radwege eingezeichnet hast. Leider hast du dafür Bing genutzt. Dadurch ist das alles etwa 2m nach Südosten verschoben.
Bitte nutz künftig in NRW die Luftbilder des NRW-Atlas oder korrigier die Verschiebung von Bing bevor du mit der Arbeit beginnst.
Im Gegensatz zu Bing und den meisten anderen Luftbilder sind die Luftbilder des NRW-Atlas sehr gut georeferenziert.
Gruß,
Andreas
MikeN (2015-08-24 21:25:36+00:00): Hi, Thank you for the edits.   Claude Collins Road was officially removed as a named street and is now a private driveway.    Originally I had just deleted it, but  I have changed it from a street to a driveway.
abel801 (2015-08-25 22:47:13+00:00): Hi, thanks for the feedback, I have been working taking into account TIGER.

 thanks again for your fixing.
luiswoo (2015-08-25 10:23:49+00:00): Для адресного поиска нужен контур с place НП. Достаточно скопировать на него содержимое точки НП. Контур НП, разной степени адекватности, есть в ППК.
Альтернатива: для каждого объекта НП добавлять addr:страна, область, район, поселение, НП.
luiswoo (2015-08-25 10:28:18+00:00): *ctrl-shift-v  — вставляет тэги с скопированного объекта на выбранный.
-off- (2015-08-25 13:46:06+00:00): Спасибо за подсказку.
literan (2015-08-25 13:53:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367315216#map=18/56.32420/36.55497

вместо этих тегов правильные будут такие:

amenity=kindergarten
barrier=fence
name=Детский сад №21 "Радуга"

area=yes вообще лучше не используйте!

а тег name - для имен собственных. Для описаний используйте тег description=
mhenson (2015-11-10 21:09:41+00:00): Corrected map data and closed your note. Thank you for helping with OSM
petrusko (2015-08-25 19:00:00+00:00): Creation du chemin pédestre. Principalement en sous-bois.
Rostranimin (2015-11-16 15:29:48+00:00): Andy: I stumbled across cycle route '1' in Croy a few months ago. Note here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/420711 Today at work someone mentioned Cumbernauld's routes - leading me to make the connection to your work to map these. Can I assume that route 1 in Croy is part of these... there were 'end of route' signs at Croy station when travelling south/west, so I'd concluded it might end there - presumably I'm wrong.
Reitstoen (2015-08-24 22:16:44+00:00): mtb:scale:uphill is graded as easier than mtb:scale. This cannot be correct, can it?
Andrew Rickard (2015-08-24 20:32:45+00:00): Adjacent tiles have used 'pista' (trail), instead of highway tags, hence, major roads tagged as 'trail'. Will need review.
eric_ (2015-08-28 10:37:20+00:00): Is there any particular reason to duplicate addresses here?
Hervé Saint-Amand (2015-08-29 11:40:45+00:00): Yes, there's a reason, the reason is that I'm a doofus. I'll fix that now, thanks for pointing it out.
eric_ (2015-08-31 11:13:44+00:00): No problem. Thanks for that.
Nakaner (2015-12-01 11:23:24+00:00): Hallo Markus,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz ein Multipolygon geschrottet. Ein Relationsmitglied mit der Rolle "inner" muss vollständig von einem Mitglied mit der Rolle "outer" umschlossen sein.

Bitte lies dir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon durch.

Ich habe den Multipolygonschaden behoben und möchte dich bitten, bei künftigen Edits, die Warnungen der Prüfroutinen von JOSM vor dem Upload ernst zu nehmen.

Bitte zeichne außerdem keine Landuse-Fläche, die sich mit anderen überschneiden. Wenn du ein Polygon mit landuse=railway in einem Wald einzeichnest, dann verändere den Wald bitte so, dass sich die beiden Flächen nicht überschneiden (die Ränder dürfen sich berühren). Dasselbe gilt auch für Bahngelände innerhalb von Ortschaften, hier bitte die Ortschaft in zwei Teile teilen. (Mit dem Plugin utilsplugin2 kannst du mit Alt+X Flächen aufteilen).

Falls zu Fragen zu Multipolygonen und Landnutzung hast, kannst du diese gerne im Forum oder auf Talk-de oder im IRC stellen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Hjart (2015-08-25 18:09:36+00:00): Geodatastyrelsen har efter sigende nye billeder klar i løbet af september (fra foråret)
Rudolf Mayer (2015-08-26 09:13:08+00:00): I saw you tagged http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367342449 as a golf course - can you provide details to that? is it part of Hoyte golf course?
Offit Moffit (2015-08-26 14:19:16+00:00): Hi, it's the driving range that belongs to Holtye golf club. 

I have noticed that the golf the 2 clubs come under sweet woods?  Is that right? 

The reason is I want to know is that I live in the area and want to make the area as accurate as possible.  There are a lot of paths that aren't listed. 

Kind regards, 

Eddie
Rudolf Mayer (2015-08-26 14:39:07+00:00): The initial mapper had just mapped one course, I untangled that earlier today; I now merged the driving range together with the Holtye Golf Club, thanks for your info!
Misa_zumba (2020-06-07 21:12:05+00:00): Can you check name of this road is it Gaytons Road, Gayton road or does not have a name. Thanks.
Glenhope1 (2020-06-09 22:45:44+00:00): Ararat shire do not put their road register online which is a pain. This would be the definitive answer. Also streetview shows no road signs in place. "Gayton" does match all other sources I could find.
Misa_zumba (2020-06-10 00:22:18+00:00): Thanks for the helpful and quick response.
Ivo St (2015-08-24 22:42:30+00:00): Вече няма Hypo в тази сграда.
Клонът на Пощенска банка също го няма там.
jgarcia74 (2015-08-25 00:38:21+00:00): comite estatal
JeSe-MX (2015-08-26 00:32:35+00:00): Favor de agregar sus "Rutas" con relaciones, y no con vías fantasmas que crean clonflicto sobre vías existentes.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-08-25 23:23:43+00:00): Dwie sprawy:
- proszę dodawać kompletną informację adresową (sam numer to za mało)
- proszę rysować do skalibrowanego podkładu lub włączyć sobie podkład z Geoportalu.
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-09-02 23:39:46+00:00): Hi TuanIfan. I changed geometry  of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/367378949). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
literan (2015-08-25 13:55:54+00:00): Полную фигню сделали с круговым движением, неужели не видите? Отдельными линиями рисуются только дороги, имеющие физический разделитель. Правку откатываю.
M!dgard (2015-08-25 10:59:16+00:00): Dag gillebert

Is de weg die je hier tekent een echte straat of een privéweg? Ik kan hem niet zien op de satellietbeelden. Kunnen er echt auto's rijden?

Groeten, M!dgard
Hjart (2015-08-25 17:55:00+00:00): Hvad forsøgte du at lave her til sidst?
carlbruhn (2015-08-25 21:24:29+00:00): Jeg prøvede at finde noget symbol, eller en måde at angive på at der her findes 2 udmærkede sheltere til at overnatte i. Umiddelbart synes jeg ikke det var så nemt at finde. Muligvis er openstreet maps mere rettet mod byer og veje.
Mvh
Carl
BeKri (2015-09-17 13:52:45+00:00): Sicher, dass der Biinzring 2
mit 2 i geschrieben wird ?
SOSM (2015-09-17 15:04:18+00:00): Offensichtliche Tippfehler sollte man einfach korrigieren.
GerdP (2015-10-20 19:51:58+00:00): please review:
highway=track;cycleway 
is not valid (way 367394900)
If the ways are not build for cycling,
they are probably all highway=track,
else I guess highway=path matches better?
arkarkark (2015-10-20 20:50:23+00:00): Thanks @GerdP

These are all singletrack mountain bike trails
my client didn't have a great choice when trying to specify what types they were.
GerdP (2015-10-21 06:19:05+00:00): okay, I've changed it to highway=cycleway for now so that it matches the other ways
and appears on the map.
The name tags also seem to need a review,
they contain lists (seperated by semicolon)
arkarkark (2015-10-21 07:37:38+00:00): great, thanks for the help. I removed the extra ;Endo from those names.
wambacher (2015-09-26 06:17:32+00:00): hi,

why did you remove type=boundary, boundary=administrative and admin_level=8 from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4469413 ? and may be other relation?

from my point of view it is a normal town/city and needs that tags.
iWowik (2015-09-28 12:17:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4469413
The object city Рудный is just a place object, it is not administrative object as Рудный Г.А.
user_5359 (2016-07-02 05:46:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have reverted your changeset, because are not a street. Please try again to mark the location of your office  (and not the street).

If you need help: You are welcome.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-09-03 08:25:52+00:00): Nosz kurde, poprzesuwałeś nieswoje rzeczy do gównianego podkładu. Kto to teraz ma naprawić?
seav (2015-08-27 16:08:18+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contributions. I do have a couple of issues with them, though.

1. It seems that you deleted an old building polygon and replaced it with a new building polygon for Regina Building. It would be much better to just modify the existing polygon instead of deleting it as some information is lost.

2. You renamed a bank from "BPI" to "Roman-Santos Building". You should have renamed the building polygon instead of the bank point.

I have corrected these 2 issues here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33625073
Georges62 (2015-12-01 10:40:38+00:00): 1/12/15 : en cours sur GC
ratrun (2015-08-29 16:04:49+00:00): Hallo, bitte wandle die Steinbergrunde in eine Wanderwegrelation um. Einfach nur offensichtlich von GPS abgeleitete Daten hochladen geht nicht, weil dadurch nur überlappende Wegsegmente entstehen. Danke.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-02-10 09:31:10+00:00): Hi! 🙂 I wonder if I can ask one thing about some of the buildings you have added here. Sometimes you have added a node inside a building with the same `shop` tag. e.g. This building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364483936 ) is tagged `shop=greengrocer`, but inside it, there's this stand alone node ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3713347841 ) which is also (and only) tagged `shop=greengrocer`.

Under [OSM's "On feature, One OSM object"](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element) guideline, that would imply there are *two* greengrocers here! And I don't think that's what you mean, right? 😄

I'm fixing up some of the other instances of this in Dar now, but I thought I should talk to you directly as well. 🙂
Pirolina (2015-08-26 21:11:43+00:00): Das der Änderungssatz 33209127 für die History rückgängig gemacht wurde kann man akzeptieren. Nicht jedoch das die Änderungen dieses CS wenigstens zum Teil wieder übernommen wurden! Das u.a. der Weg 367411794 nun wieder auf tertiary hochgestuft wurde ist jetzt definitiv ein Kartenfehler. Danke! 
Es lebe der Wasserturm!
Nakaner (2015-08-27 06:58:31+00:00): Die Hochstufung auf tertiary war nicht beabsichtigt. Entschuldigung. Das habe ich korrigiert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33612801 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33612814
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-10 10:43:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33929543 where the changeset comment is: revert deletions
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-10 10:43:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33929543 where the changeset comment is: revert deletions
streckenkundler (2015-08-25 11:12:59+00:00): Hallo kika1974,

lass mal bitte bei dem Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169873803 surface=asphalt. Der ist letztes Jahr mit EU-Mitteln asphaltiert worden, Luftbild ist da nicht mehr aktuell.

Sven
Ewen Hill (2015-08-25 12:58:42+00:00): Great work on doing the NSW/Vic border. Never enough Kudos. Just west of Wentworth is an annex of the Murray_sunset NP. The first section does not touch the Murray however once it crosses Deadman's track it should use the border if you wish to merge it all.
TheSwavu (2015-08-26 08:55:56+00:00): If I knew how tedious it was going to be I'm not sure I would have started...

I've been moving any boundaries that are administrative to the border and those that are land use to the river bank.
ma-rt-in (2015-08-26 06:38:59+00:00): Das Teilstück ist keine Einbahnstr.
Warin61 (2016-09-14 09:55:57+00:00): Norah Creek? 
I have Jews Creek from LPI, cannot find Norah Creek on GeoScience Australia place name search. Possibly local community being 'politically correct'? Way 367426782. I have left the culvert with that name, but changed the creek - along with its course.
mrpulley (2016-09-14 14:09:29+00:00): I don't have my voice recordings from last year, so I don't recall the sign. There must be a Norah Creek somewhere, as there is a Norah Creek Road nearby! I'm not planning on going that way for a while, but I'll try to remember to check sometime with a survey.
TheSwavu (2016-09-14 21:32:55+00:00): GNB says Jews Creek:

http://www.gnb.nsw.gov.au/place_naming/placename_search/extract?id=MaYbBKWAKW
Warin61 (2016-09-14 21:54:21+00:00): Now that is interesting .. says Nora Creek.. as an old name. So maybe the LPI data base is more upto date here.. I have come across places where it is old.
Warin61 (2016-09-14 22:34:46+00:00): Strangely I just came across Norah Creek Road - way 180236917. I was extending Mandagery Creek and there it is ... Norah Creek Road.
mrpulley (2017-08-28 10:02:01+00:00): I've just checked the signs for the creek crossings. Larras Lee Road has 'Jews Creek'. Banjo Paterson Way has 'Norah Creek' (with the 'h'). Burgoon Lane doesn't have any signs. I'll add an 'old_name=Norah Creek' tag to the creek.
naoliv (2015-08-28 20:40:38+00:00): Elias, você está colocando vários nomes supérfluos nas vias (e também alguns acessos desnecessários).
Por exemplo, "Entrada do Mendes Convetion Center" não é um nome correto para a rua.
"Acesso à Avenida X" seria outro exemplo.
Constable (2017-02-11 17:37:21+00:00): ciao, è vero che è passato un po' di tempo da quando hai inserito il sentiero ma puoi dare un'occhiata a questa nota https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/481629 e darmi una mano a connettere il sentiero nel punto giusto?
grazie
dudka (2015-09-29 11:00:15+00:00): якісь криві мультиполігони тут створені, це мали би бути просто лінії

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=25.95503&lat=49.45184&zoom=17&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,intersections
Сергій Дубик (2015-09-29 20:06:48+00:00): виправив, це scanaerial часом криво спрацьовує
M!dgard (2015-08-26 09:24:13+00:00): Het lijkt me zeer onwaarschijnlijk dat deze stroom de straten zo mooi volgt i.p.v. gewoon rechtdoor te gaan. Aangezien je als bron van je kennis "osmose" ingeeft, wat geen bron van kennis is, enkel een QA-tool, zal ik de vrijheid nemen deze verbindingsstukken te verwijderen. Als je weet dat de stroom toch ondergronds de straten volgt, gelieve dan de bron van je kennis te vermelden in de changeset-metadata.
Jakka (2015-08-26 09:43:32+00:00): Stromen, eerder beken of brede grachten worden in veel gevallen door de hoofdriolering gestuurd die dus wel de straten volgen. Mij niet gelaten.... Klopt pas vergeet soms de source aan te passen.
Jakka (2015-08-26 09:45:22+00:00): Begin mijn fout opsporing met osmose en dan ga zonder te beseffen verbeter werk ik verder. Jij niet ?
M!dgard (2015-08-26 09:47:23+00:00): Het punt is dat je niet weet hoe het loopt, en het dus ook niet moet tekenen. Het kan rechtdoor gaan, of het kan volgens de straten getunneld zijn. Als je iets niet weet, map het dan niet in plaats van onzekere informatie toe te voegen. :)
Jakka (2015-08-26 09:49:08+00:00): Ik raadpleegde AGIV maar was niet vermeld in mijn source, Zelf even checken had je het gezien. Nooit veroordelen....
M!dgard (2015-08-26 09:52:49+00:00): Op de AGIV-satellietbeelden kan je niets zien. Ik neem dus aan dat je het GRB bedoelt, en daarvan mogen we enkel de straatnamen en huisnummers overnemen. Geen huiscontouren, geen waterlopen.
M!dgard (2015-08-26 09:53:47+00:00): Ze zijn wel bezig die informatie vrij te geven, maar tot nader order kunnen we het dus niet gebruiken.
Jakka (2015-08-26 09:56:39+00:00): Ik neem geen contoeren over kijk waar het loopt en dan gewoon intekenen ....is niet 100% juist maar beter dan gewoon rechtdoor .....van één zichtbaar punt naar ander.
Hjart (2015-08-25 15:45:42+00:00): Why are you adding both bicycle=designated and highway=cycleway? Those two tags are saying pretty much the same thing.