piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-03-18 11:17:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...  OSM is niet zomaar geschikt als testomgeving. Er is schade ontstaan aan de kaart. 
Een weg ligt nu dwars over de bebouwing
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway

Ook is het gebied van je edits veel te groot. Beperk je svp tot bv een straat.

Gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Svp niet veranderen door naar de daken te kijken. Daar ligt het gebouw niet.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-03-18 11:20:23+00:00): reverted by changeset #118628604 due to cause damage to the map. 

Je edits zijn teruggedraaid. 
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
abakus_uploader (2022-03-18 23:31:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
silversurfer83 (2024-06-03 08:27:55+00:00): Gude :)

gehe ich recht in der Annahme, dass die Witwe Bolte dort ein "Foodtruck" ist?

Grüße
silversurfer83
pkoby (2022-03-18 23:48:22+00:00): I noticed you removed the maxweight tag. Could you instead change the tag to the correct number if you have local knowledge or another source? I suppose that it should be "0.75 st" for US short tons? Thanks!
tonyf1 (2022-03-19 02:21:08+00:00): Did you visit location 671174716, v3 before you re-tagged it? There is signage. There is even a note about the signage.
HighRouleur (2022-03-20 02:06:30+00:00): Rode along Cheltenham Rd west bound during the week. No sign was present at the junction with Reserve Rd where path starts. 
If bike we’re permitted a sign will be present at the start and end of the path.
tonyf1 (2022-03-20 02:32:10+00:00): The signage is, I think, for the section between the end of St Andrews and the end of McKay . You say Reserve Rd but maybe you mean Bluff or Cheltenham? I don't think you would see the signage from either Bluff or Cheltenham.
tonyf1 (2022-03-20 02:34:10+00:00): I may be misinterpreting it but there is bicycle signage and there is a note referring to the signage in previous edits.
HighRouleur (2022-03-20 06:49:11+00:00): I double checked the note in the previous version of the way.
From what I recall there was a sign on a power pole directing to a bike route in a given direction. However there is no bike path that is marked on the ground or via a shared path/permitted bike path.
From my ride it was evident that way 671174716 was only a footpath unless I missed something
tonyf1 (2022-03-20 06:57:46+00:00): Hi, I think you are saying that there is a bike route but there is no permitted path for this section of the route. It doesn't sound right but you might be right. I hope to get out and inspect it but it won't be for a week or more. Thanks for the replies. Tony
tonyf1 (2022-03-27 02:56:04+00:00): Hi Sebastian, I took some Mapillary photos. I will discuss this further when the photo uploads are done, probably on talk_au
MichaelCollinson (2022-03-27 03:47:01+00:00): FYI, I am the orginal mapper of the path as a cycleway ( but have not been back recently). There were clear cycleway signs at both ends of St Andrews Court. It is not 100% clear whether then apply to the road or the footpath. The footpath itself is indeed very narrow and unmarked (though that happens elsewhere in east Melbourne too). On the other hand, why mark an unremarkable residential road as a cycleway, it does not make sense.
tonyf1 (2022-03-27 03:57:16+00:00): Hi, Photos to come, meanwhile I think St Andrews Crt is the cycle route, not the footpath, the 50metres through park is cycleway. I think its the 50m of park that Sebastian will dispute but best have the photos as hard evidence before discussing. Thanks Tony
tonyf1 (2022-03-27 07:26:59+00:00): photos at https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-37.962247513974&lng=145.01882162969002&z=18.085357379143982&pKey=158986949844367&focus=photo
tonyf1 (2022-03-27 08:09:55+00:00): Starting with the first of the previous link
1 my finger and cnr Bluff and Tulip
4 cnr Tulip and Garnet Leary
5 closeup signs
9 end of lane, Garnet Leary
10 looking back
14 Fern St
15 Tricks Res
18 McKay Ave
19 looking back
20 lane to Cheltenham Rd
21 End of McKay
22 End of St Andrews
23 ditto
29 Cheltenham Rd
30 ditto
31 Whitton crt
33 St Andrews
42 Lane nth to McKay
48 McKay
50 gate from Tricks Res
52 end Bluff Rd
HighRouleur (2022-04-01 10:06:32+00:00): Correct. The footpath had been incorrectly tagged to permit bicycles which was what I corrected in the first place. 
Agree the St Andrew’s Court is the bicycle route but being a roadway bicycles are permitted by.
tonyf1 (2022-04-01 10:29:44+00:00): Do you agree with the 50m between St Andrews and McKay allowing bicycles?
HighRouleur (2022-04-06 03:14:39+00:00): From the Mapillary info provided, there doesn’t appear to be any signage permitting bicycles on said road.
Given it forms part of a designated bike route perhaps bicycle = dismount might be the most appropriate.
tonyf1 (2022-04-09 01:56:37+00:00): Way: 671174716 has been split in two see Changeset #119489545. Please discuss before reverting
HighRouleur (2022-04-09 10:24:52+00:00): Good idea to split the way.
I don't necessarily agree on the path connecting St Andrew Court and McKay Avenue having bicycle=yes but I'll leave it be.
azakh-world (2022-04-08 12:38:56+00:00): Hello.
There are two stations at Val De Fontenay: n5464721497, n5464721498. If there is one big stop_area it's impossible to determine which stop_position (also, train_station_entrances and other features) belongs to which station, so I've split the stop_area into two and returned the stop_area_group relation. I don't see a problem in having two stop_areas with the same uic_ref: a data user may easily combine all element into one set if they need to. The reverse task - to divide elements at an interchange station into two subsets - is unsolvable in general case.

Best regards,
Alexey
maro21 (2022-03-19 13:51:08+00:00): Na pewno pod drzewem coś tu jest? Ale adres się nie zgadza.
Mordechai23 (2022-03-19 20:26:01+00:00): już poprawiam tagi - skopiowałem po prostu punkt recepcyjny z teków. Tu od budynku dworca do końca placyku ciągną się namioty
emersonveenstra (2022-03-18 11:59:01+00:00): This is very clearly a residential house, why did you tag it as office=company?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118628267
user_5359 (2022-03-18 12:05:39+00:00): Because you can also run a business out of a residential building. That does not mean that there are construction machines there. The name would not belong to a business but to a house and that is definitely wrong.
MxxCon (2022-03-19 05:10:54+00:00): Hello.
Please note that as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions "name" tag is not supposed to be used as description.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118628551
MxxCon (2022-03-19 05:13:08+00:00): Additionally, the building you carelessly mapped crosses over a sidewalk, doesn't match the actual satellite imagery and was drawn on top of an existing building. 👎
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118628551
pabi12 (2022-03-24 05:43:00+00:00): Acknowledged, this won't happen again.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-18 14:58:05+00:00): Hello mosstreet,
Please use meaningful changes for your comments, explaining what you changed and what the source was.  Using "разное" ("different") every time does not help other mappers to understand what you have changed.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-03-18 14:58:41+00:00): Привет Мосстрит,
Пожалуйста, используйте значимые изменения для ваших комментариев, объясняя, что вы изменили и каков был источник. Использование «разное» каждый раз не помогает другим мапперам понять, что вы изменили.
С уважением,
Энди
mosstreet (2022-03-18 17:52:38+00:00): Hello, if the edit has a specific meaning, I indicate it. In this edit, 35 objects that you offer me all of their representatives have been changed. And if there are 200 of them, look at the statistics, you can count one object, one edit
Created	
Nodes 1,088,953 (80%)	
Ways 139,964 (57%)	
Relations	4,900
SomeoneElse (2022-03-21 19:22:16+00:00): Thanks; I use "name:signed" but had no idea people had been adding "signed:name" in some places in the UK!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-21 19:48:09+00:00): This user https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118595559 used signed:name because of ID showing it as a multilingual name
voiden (2022-07-17 22:27:58+00:00): takk for denne. tidligere har noen tegnet inn masse fortau i sentrum uten å tegne fotgjengeroverganger. da oppstår sånne problemer. egentlig burde hele endringssettet bli fjernet, men det er for sent nå, jeg har allerede gått i gang med å korrigere og tegne inn overgangsfelt.
janolezab (2022-03-18 12:53:30+00:00): Du meinst nicht zufällig https://osm.org/way/104677645?
uil (2022-03-18 15:34:34+00:00): Hi,  doch, danke! Zum Finden fehlte mir eigentlich nur der Name, den die BSR nutzt: Recyclinghof Brunsbütteler Damm
janolezab (2022-03-22 12:42:56+00:00): Das Problem hatte ich auch schon mal.

Dann schlage ich vor, die beiden zu mergen und den Namen zum existierenden hinzuzufügen.
uil (2022-03-23 14:24:41+00:00): Gern! Kannst Du das machen? Mergen hatte ich noch nicht
janolezab (2022-03-29 18:36:16+00:00): Done, ich habe den Knoten in die Linie eingefügt und seine (zusätzlichen) Eigenschaften übertragen
mavl (2022-05-20 15:52:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-03-19 12:54:23+00:00): Ciao. Il formato dei numeri di telefono è "<prefisso internazionale><spazio><prefisso nazionale><spazio><numero>". Ho corretto tutti i numeri inseriti che iniziavano con "+39 012 " in quanto 012 non è un prefisso ma i prefissi sono 0124 o 0125. Ciao, Andrea
user_4493657 (2022-03-29 15:02:11+00:00): Nie spotkałem się od bardzo wielu wielu lat z dodawaniem kreseczek mających za zadanie symulowanie pojazdu do miejsc parkingowych oraz ukrywanie rzekomego błędu związanego z dojazdem do miejsc parkingowych.
W celu opisu możliwości parkingowych w obrębie danej drogi stosujemy pełen wachlarz tagów https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane 

Przykładowa mapka ładnie koloryzująca tego typu obiekty https://zlant.github.io/parking-lanes/#15/52.2774/16.6989
user_4493657 (2022-03-29 15:02:48+00:00): Chodzi o obiekty tego typu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041412868
maraf24 (2022-03-31 20:27:06+00:00): Niewątpliwie taki kreseczki są zbędne dla nawigacji, a z punktu widzenia OSM błędne, bo to nie alejka parkingowa, ale wjazd na jedno konkretne miejsce parkingowe.  Wypadałoby więc dodać wjazdy do wszystkich pozostałych miejsc, czego jednak w OSM nie robimy.
olehz (2022-03-19 11:42:27+00:00): СКІЛЬКИ, БЛЯТЬ, ЩЕ РАЗ ПРОСИТИ НЕ ЗСОВУВАТИ ДОРОГИ і ОБЄКТИ З GPS-ТРЕКІВ?!!! долбойоб тупорилий. вже 50 коментів лишив, навів купу аргументів з картинками, а воно далі як баран продовжує все нищити. ревертаю всі твої правки, дебіл колгоспний
olehz (2022-03-19 12:15:35+00:00): шоб ти здох даун. за місяць все розєбав, поки усім було не до ОСМ, воно блять сиділо кожного дня і паскудило все навкруги. кончена тупа тварь!!!! це навіть відкатити неможливо. велике тобі дякую
Shaun das Schaf (2022-03-20 11:23:27+00:00): Hallo fidelcastrop, willkommen bei OSM!

Die Fläche war bereits eingetragen als https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88145847
Ich habe die von dir hinzugefügten Informationen deshalb auf die bestehende Fläche übertragen und die von dir neu angelegte Fläche wieder entfernt.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
user_5359 (2022-03-19 15:16:51+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tags
ef: = Club Alpino Italiano sede di Ovada
source:re = 9212068
?
jonsger (2022-07-28 12:18:31+00:00): Hallo Findus,

ich glaube der Tag plant:output:electricity=1.203 GW kann nicht stimmen. Würde eher 1200 kW bzw 1.2 MW erwarten, bei solch einer Anlage. VG jonsger
Friendly_Ghost (2022-03-22 09:52:10+00:00): Allan, zou je je changesets iets inhoudelijker willen beschrijven? "Lokale kennis toepassen" zegt niet zoveel over wat je bewerkt hebt.
"Lokale kennis" past als beschrijving beter bij de "source" van je changeset.
Information01 (2022-03-22 10:44:21+00:00): Goed idee. Is soms wel eens lastig. Wanneer ik een hardlopen heb gedaan in deze omgeving en ik heb een bestaand pad gelopen wat niet in openstreetmap zichtbaar is.en ik die toevoeg is mijn omschrijving denk ik wel juist. Maar ik begrijp dat het de bedoeling is om het iets gedetaileerder zou kunnen en gebruikelijker is. Probeer het in de toekomst beter te omschrijven.

Gr. Allan
Friendly_Ghost (2022-03-24 09:59:32+00:00): Hoi Allan, 

Ik zie dat je bent begonnen met meer inhoudelijke opmerkingen. Deze zijn heel prettig om in één oogopslag een idee te krijgen van wat er bewerkt is. Ga vooral zo door!

Mvg,
Casper
mapperaid (2022-03-18 12:33:54+00:00): Town was renamed: http://president.kg/ru/sobytiya/22050_gorod_isfana_v_batkenskoy_oblasti_pereimenovan_v_gorod_razzakov
eggie (2022-03-18 12:56:36+00:00): Dag Edd....  Tip... Wanneer de weg is opnegesteld kun je de regel construction=residential verwijderen. 
oneway=no hoef je niet aan wegen toe te voegen. Dat is default.

MVG
eggie
b-jazz (2022-04-02 16:54:31+00:00): FYI, the ways that define a bunker shouldn't overlap. They should be drawn with a single line, not by copy/pasting circles on top of each other. Thanks.
eggie (2022-03-18 12:58:03+00:00): Tip... Geen oneway=no toevoegen aan reguliere wegen.
Dat doe je alleen als je bang bent dat een medemapper oneway=yes gaat toevoegen. Bv een tweerichtingrotonde voor fietsers.
MVG
eggie
praeteritum (2023-04-18 06:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135042223.
praeteritum (2023-04-18 06:14:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135042197.
woodpeck (2022-03-20 20:49:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041425795#map=19/43.61799/6.50970 is not connected to anything on its western end. I assume that is not intentional? -- Most of the trails you have uploaded in recent days are very jagged and near invisible on aerial imagery due to tree cover. Please be 100% sure that you only upload actually existing and legal trails to OSM (if their use is not permitted, add access=no). Also, understand that with highway=path you are adding trails for use by pedestrians and cyclists alike.
HPman83 (2022-03-21 09:51:33+00:00): I connected the trail with the other one (it was not intentional).
For the others trails, they are mountain bike trails and you can not see them mainly because of two reasons: They are mostly under the tree cover and some of them are more recent than the aerial view. They can be use both for mountain biking or hiking even some are quite hard to walk because not designed for it (but it's possible).
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-21 14:26:14+00:00): addr:housenumber tag seems wrong for this feature
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118632472
pmarkina_lyft (2022-03-22 08:51:57+00:00): Hi, Spaghetti Monster!
My name is Polina and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this. Looks like I accidentally added the addr:housenumber tag. I’ve fixed my mistake in the OSM changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118767800.   
I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience that may have been caused.
Best regards, Polina
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-31 15:00:31+00:00): أخ حمدي نرجوا منكم التأكد قبل إضافة أي موقع للخريطة العامة
krusefahrer (2022-03-19 16:33:23+00:00): Dear Lakatos,

are you sure that your apteka is not a successor of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3509588275 ?
nevw (2022-03-19 08:11:19+00:00): Hi
ARTWALK = SHAC2022 is not a recognised tag and does not belong in the OSM. Perhaps you could use the ref tag for this or the description tag.
Name is for the name only...also not all in uppercase...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
Many of your names I have changed to description , including name = Private House.
Some names end in "in 2022" which I deleted as it is not part of it's name. 
Other tags you are using don't seem to exist yet.
Don't be discouraged or annoyed at these changes.
The OSM is essentially a database with tags and mapping topology confined to a consensus method of mapping.
With these rules, maps are able to be rendered correctly in an expected and consistent way. 

I have changed some of your tags and have remapped the outline of some of the buildings. I have also added a primary tag to identify its use such as ...
amenity=pub
amenity=cafe
office=company
amenity=clinic for the podiatrist
etc
nevw (2022-03-19 10:14:41+00:00): Just thinking about your mapping...
You may find that uMap http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ may suit your needs better that adding those edits directly to the OSM.
uMap allows you to use the OSM as a background and you add all the stuff relavent to ARTWALK SHAC 2022 on top of the map.
I haven't used uMap but it is often recommended for mapping similar things that you doing.
nevw (2022-03-26 08:49:44+00:00): Hi ChatTouring
did you have a look at uMap or similar and find a better way to use map your special data?
If you have managed to find a good alternative way to display your info, I would like to return the OSM values to their usual format.
user_5359 (2022-03-28 07:21:18+00:00): @nevw: See also different writings of the tag ARTWALK = SHAC2022 (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118658219 comment).
there are two possibilities: Once consistent deletion, because of suspicion of an event entry, or renaming to (e.g.) ref:AU:artwalk. Which would you choose?
nevw (2022-03-28 07:38:24+00:00): Hi
I would favour deletion of all stuff that doesn’t fit in OSM as there are many other better options to cater for their needs as I see it.
user_5359 (2022-03-28 08:09:53+00:00): done
nevw (2022-03-28 08:15:13+00:00): If ArtWalk SHAC2022 was a permanent feature all the venues could be tagged as art displays with opening hours, etc and a local walking route mapped for the area but it seems to a short term event. I expect that uMap or similar would suit them well. There seem a few sites advertising the events.
eg https://www.shacballarat.org.au/
Perhaps we could use the ref tag as you have suggested until after the event is complete and then return OSM to normal.
nevw (2022-03-28 08:19:29+00:00): sorry, I was typing while you were fixing.
I’m happy with the result, especially as there has been no response from the op offering a way forward. I’ll fix up some of the other tags in the next week or so.
nevw (2022-03-28 13:20:09+00:00): Chat Touring send me a message saying she has found a better suited map for the event and fine with the changes.
nevw (2022-03-28 13:38:32+00:00): For others interested in this subject here is another link giving info about the Ballarat Art Walk activities…
https://www.creativeballarat.com.au/public-art-walks
user_5359 (2022-03-20 06:25:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663673010/history. What is the meaning of lt_name:de? Did you mean alt_name:de?
chstnt (2022-03-20 07:27:24+00:00): 应该是 alt_name:de，已经修正
user_5359 (2022-03-20 07:29:56+00:00): Thank you!
谢谢
eggie (2022-03-18 21:00:18+00:00): Dag Cruysen,, Je vraagt feedback. 
Wanneer iets gesloopt is kun je het ook weghalen uit OSM. Het vlak landuse=residential heb ik verwijderd. 
Er is hier al een landuse=residential.
Bedoel je wellicht landuse=construction (bouwplaats?)
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118633345
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-18 21:20:04+00:00): residential heb ik even omgezet naar landuse=greenfield. Wanneer er gebouwd gaat worden kun je het omzetten naar landuse=construction.
Gr eggie
praeteritum (2023-04-18 06:14:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135042151.
PT-53 (2022-03-19 06:58:58+00:00): Hallo Ygramul,
diese Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041433962/history
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
Ygramul (2022-03-19 07:08:42+00:00): Oh, hab ich da eine Warnung übersehen? Mach ich. Das ist eine meiner Hilfslinien für Hydranten gewesen. Fliegt mit dem nächsten Changeset weg und danke für den Hinweis :-)
praeteritum (2023-04-17 05:45:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134999326.
eggie (2022-03-25 19:06:49+00:00): Hoi

Bedankt voor je BAG import.
Het nieuwe wijkje Amstelwijckpark heb ik voor het grootste deel nog even op proposed gezet. Er is nog niets te zien in het veld. 
Alleen bij de bushalte zijn ze de voorbereidende werkzaamheden voorbij en zie je de eerste funderingen. .
Gebouwen in het zuidelijk deel die nog in de BAG stonden en gesloopt zin heb ik weer verwijderd en wat er nog wel staat, maar in de BAG als gesloopt staat heb ik even ingetekend. 'k Houd het wel in de gaten hier. 
De huisnummers ook maar even op proposed gezet.. anders komer er weer vragen over. 

De BAG was deze keer iets te snel met Bouw gestart. 

Groet
eggie
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-22 11:15:09+00:00): You duplicated this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1041435646
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118633716
Puxan (2022-04-25 15:21:58+00:00): Hola georgie gentles, Veo que has mapeado una cuantas veces en distintos proyectos, muy bién, pero deberías ser más cuidadoso con las etiquetas que pones a los objetos. En este caso has delimitado una gran extensión de terreno que incluye varios edificios. A todo el terreno le has puesto una etiqueta de edificio, pero eso no es un edificio. 
Muy bien, sigue mapeando.

Joaquim
Si tienes dudas puedes  mandarme un mensaje entrando en mi página https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Puxan 

Te recomiendo ver los tutoriales que puedes encontrar en https://learnosm.org/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118634133
Puxan (2022-04-25 15:22:16+00:00): Hi georgie gentles, I see you have mapped a few times in different projects, very good, but you should be more careful with the labels you put on the objects. In this case you have delimited a large area of land that includes several buildings. You've given the whole lot a building tag, but that's not a building.
Alright, keep mapping.

Joaquim
If you have questions you can send me a message by entering my page https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Puxan

I recommend you to see the tutorials that you can find at https://learnosm.org/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118634133
ivanbranco (2022-03-19 15:27:44+00:00): Ciao Zerton,

"name=ex Pub Delirium ora chiuso"

eventuali note non vanno aggiunte nel nome. 

Se il pub ha chiuso potresti eliminare amenity=pub o aggiungere il prefisso disused:amenity=* ecc. Il tag name va utilizzato solo per i nomi propri.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223389057

Qua hai aggiunto il civico alla strada. Per convenzione in Italia il civico va aggiunto come nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso/numerino.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9587915527

qua hai aggiunto addr:housenumber=snc, andrebbe utilizzato nohousenumber=yes piuttosto

Se hai dubbi chiedi pure :)
krusefahrer (2022-03-24 10:20:22+00:00): Hi Ray,

please also add service=spur to disused spur lines. Thank you for your work and keep mapping!