piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
olo81 (2021-02-07 19:58:32+00:00): Czy w tym miejscu jest pomnik, tablica czy coś w tym stylu? Nie dodajemy do mapy miejsc których już nie ma!
Robert Surma (2021-02-08 06:58:42+00:00): W tym miejscu jest tablica "Zegar słoneczny w kształcie Tory" symbolizująca cmentarz, oraz wzmianka o cmentarzu na tablicy informacyjnej.
Robert Surma (2021-02-08 07:00:04+00:00): https://sztetl.org.pl/pl/media/53147-stary-cmentarz-zydowski-w-bedzinie?ref=art&nid=6831
olo81 (2021-02-08 12:00:15+00:00): Zegar jest już dodany i znajduje się na północy od tego miejsca.
rab (2017-07-20 19:52:54+00:00): only untagged nodes
geow (2017-07-22 22:33:17+00:00): Ist die Angabe "für Fahrräder nicht erlaubt" per E-Mail nachvollziehbar belegt worden? Falls nein, sollte das  Verbot IMHO nicht ohne Vor-Ort-Wissen ergänzt werden.
woodpeck (2017-07-23 08:49:39+00:00): Das thüringische Waldgesetz erlaubt das Radfahren (nur) "auf befestigten Wegen und Straßen". Ein Blick auf das Luftbild liess es mir unwahrscheinlich erscheinen, dass sich an dieser Stelle ein befestigter Weg befindet - unwahrscheinlich genug, um der E-Mail zu glauben, die wir erhalten haben. In der E-Mail hiess es, dass die Polizei hier Mountainbiker einsammelt, die verbotenerweise den Weg benutzen, und diese Mountainbiker sich dann auf OSM berufen. Mir scheint, dass ein "bicycle=no" zumindest vorübergehend hier Schaden abwendet. - Trotzdem hast Du im Grunde natürlich recht, und daher habe ich im deutschen Forum auch gefragt, ob sich jemand vor Ort die Sache mal anschauen kann.
geow (2017-07-23 10:05:21+00:00): Danke, ich habe noch einen Hinweis ergänzt, in der Hoffnung auf bessere Sichtbarkeit für lokale Kenner,  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1075389

Die allgemeine Diskussion zum Wegerecht in Thüringen könnten wir ja im Forum vertiefen, https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59158

Gruß
geow
geow (2017-07-26 19:39:03+00:00): Hmm, jetzt hat sich ein neuer user (e-quadrat) angemeldet und die 2 Wegabschnitte südlich des Oberen Hermannsbergsteins gelöscht. Ich habe es hier mal andiskutiert...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50592716
letihu (2017-10-20 13:34:00+00:00): Ist dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29291987/history#map=15/54.2267/12.4787&layers=N
wirklich ein Wasserweg? Warum ende er direkt an diesem
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65085748/history
Weg?
Kennst Du dich dort aus und kannst das vielleicht in Ordnung bringen?
oormilavinod (2017-07-17 05:44:13+00:00): hey Takafu , welcome to OSM. i just observed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Silva1989 (2017-07-16 11:41:19+00:00): De acordo com os censos 2011 a população de Santa Cruz das Flores é de 1504. Vou corrigir a edição
ViriatoLusitano_import (2017-07-16 12:13:14+00:00): Obrigado pela observação! :)
nebulon42 (2017-07-16 09:20:00+00:00): Sorry, I had to undo your change. It seemed to me that you added personal information to the map which is viewable by everyone. Since you use Maps.me you might not know that any changes you make there end up in the OpenStreetMap project (openstreetmap.org). Hence everyone can see what you changed.
Sergey93 (2017-12-17 07:02:01+00:00): За "дорожка имени меня любимого <3" надо банить
will_p (2017-08-05 17:20:32+00:00): Hi, 

In this changeset you tagged two bus stops on the A50 close to the A453/M1 roundabout - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/562726847 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/562725505. Have you actually visited this location and confirmed the existence of these bus stops? I ask because there definitely wasn't a bus stop next to the north bound carriageway when I surveyed here at Easter. It seems an unlikely location because it is on a grass verge without a pavement and so would be difficult and potentially dangerous to reach. 

Thanks,
Will
will_p (2017-08-12 16:30:35+00:00): I passed by here this afternoon and noted that there were definitely no bus stops. Please be more careful when remote mapping. The presence of NaPTAN imported customary stop nodes does not mean there are bus stops. Please remember that OSM is a collaborative project. If you had answered my initial question on this changeset, your mistakes could have been fixed without needing to be checked on the ground.
aharvey (2017-10-05 22:57:13+00:00): I noticed the cafe you added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4972926520 was already mapped in OSM http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4331958057

I've deleted your one and kept the one which was there first, just updating the position slightly to where you had it.
utack (2017-07-16 20:03:23+00:00): Tag,  
sollte dieser Weg gelöscht werden, oder nur von "footway" nach "path" umdeklariert werden?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252752709
mavl (2017-07-16 14:48:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту OpenStreetMap [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Вы добавили на карту магазин электроники с названием «АО"Тюменьэнерго" Тюменские распределительные сети]. Напишите, пожалуйста, это действительно такой магазин электроники?
mavl (2017-07-16 14:48:25+00:00): Чтобы ответить на это сообщение, вам нужно перейти по ссылке на сайт OpenStreetMap. Затем войти под своей учётной записью и написать комментарий на сайте в пустое поле в разделе "Обсуждение".  
  
Если у вас возникли какие-либо вопросы, то вы можете задать их на форуме [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21].  
На форуме есть тема о Тюменской области [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=7083].
DaveF (2017-07-29 11:24:03+00:00): Could you clarify what this is please?
utack (2017-07-16 15:00:34+00:00): Danke für die ganzen Zusatzinfos 👍
literan (2017-07-16 12:01:12+00:00): скажите, зачем вы добавляете многочисленные магазины дверей там где их нет, а также шлюзы посреди Москвы? правке доверия нет (каждая третья точка - фейк), поэтому я откачу ее целиком.
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-18 07:25:09+00:00): Please do not add personal houses to the map.
cadsauxk (2017-07-20 23:20:03+00:00): Oi Colega

Você colocou uma igreja no meio de uma mina em Morro dos Ferros. Tá certo isto?

abraço
DaveF (2017-07-16 09:46:40+00:00): Hi
Do you have any details for this airstrip. I can find no info.
jan_olieslagers (2017-07-16 10:03:21+00:00): I found it in a list , published as a pdf, called "Britisch Isles Airfield Guide". It dates from 2013 though, so I cannot vouch there still is an active aerdrome today. Do feel free to add "note" or "fixme" or "closed=yes" as you see fit. Regards,
SomeoneElse (2017-07-17 14:49:02+00:00): @jan_olieslagers what's the licence associated with the PDF and where did the information in it come from?
jan_olieslagers (2017-07-17 15:54:10+00:00): I've no idea. There is no mention of copyright or licence in the pdf that I could find. Let me have an address and I'll be glad to mail it to you. Regards,
SomeoneElse (2017-07-18 20:04:52+00:00): A quick web search of "Britisch Isles Airfield Guide" "pdf" "2013" finds a few candidates, such as http://www.laasdata.com/uploads/The-LAAS-British-Isles-Airfield-Guide.pdf .  Is it perhaps one of those?  
In the absense of any other information we probably can't assume that the licence is suitable for use in OSM.  Many "gathered off the web" things will have depended at some stage on Google geocoding.
In this case the position of the woodland makes the position as marked hard to believe - a takeoff or landing into the prevailing westerly wind would likely end up wrapped around a tree.
Cebderby (2017-07-19 10:23:52+00:00): Visually, the line of T hangars at the west shows it was an aviation site (at the time of the images).  Looks like it is a private site known variously as (Wickwar/Yate) Chase Farm (Airstrip), certainly in use 2009-2016 (see https://svmc.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/August-2016.pdf).  The E-W run at the north of the field is large enough for microlights.
Geofreund1 (2019-04-24 14:53:42+00:00): Bei der Bereinigung von Adressdubletten ist mir aufgefallen, dass die HN 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17 Legelshurster Straße wohl so nicht stimmen.
Könntest du das bitte mal prüfen.
woodpeck (2019-05-01 10:21:01+00:00): Alles vor Ort überprüft. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69761980 habe ich ein paar Geometrien etwas korrigiert, aber die Nummern stehen vor Ort definitiv genau so wie gemappt!
Geofreund1 (2019-05-01 16:25:22+00:00): Ja die Hausnummern mögen ja stimmen, aber die Zuordnung zum Straßennamen stimmt m. E. nicht. Z. B.  liegt der Gasthof Krone in der Hebelstraße, jedenfalls wenn man deren Website trauen darf.
BCNorwich (2017-07-16 11:50:23+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've adjusted the opening times tag to suit OSM practice (months not indicated are taken as closed), and removed house_number=.
Regards Bernard
mircozorzo (2017-07-16 08:50:28+00:00): La descrizione della modifica è completamente sbagliata.
Ho aggiunto la porta d'entrata.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-07-17 11:03:53+00:00): Hallo Julian, schön, dass du mithilfst, die Daten zu komplettieren. bei der Telefonnummer solltest aber das Format ohne Bindestriche verwenden, siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone
RicoElectrico (2021-02-02 14:35:33+00:00): Hej, wg tego zgłoszenia to chyba nie war_memorial, bo pomnik Jana Pawła II:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2522372

Sprawdziłbyś? Dzięki :)
oormilavinod (2017-07-18 06:30:58+00:00): hey  数之圣者 welcome to osm, I noticed that you have changed a name of the town from Shangguan to Daixian but the Chinese name suggests the name to be Shangguan. could you please add the source of this change
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-16 18:43:16+00:00): Proszę tagować poprawnie takie rzeczy: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507919450
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
AlaskaDave (2018-01-17 05:20:59+00:00): You added a 1500 node boundary for Emdendorf AFB in Alaska but failed to remove the pre-existing 100 node boundary that was added in 2013.

I have two questions: Was that merely an oversight?  And, is a 1500 node boundary really necessary to delineate this AFB?

It certainly seems to me that many redundant nodes could be removed from your NHD data without affecting the boundary for the purposes of OSM. But the bigger question is, can you revisit this object and clear up the double boundary in some fashion?

Many thanks.
AlaskaDave (2018-01-17 06:45:26+00:00): After doing some more checking, I learned that the smaller, older boundary multipolygon is incomplete. A large section is missing. If you have no objection, I will delete it and simplify the boundary you added last year.
eggie (2017-07-16 11:02:49+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-16 11:12:13+00:00): Je kunt nog toevoegen religion=christian
denomination=roman_catholic
Voeg je het zelf toe?
Joyke (2017-07-16 18:13:53+00:00): Ik wilde deze info toevoegen, maar nu zie ik niet in welk veld (tag?) ik dit kwijt kan. Gr. Joyke
eggie (2017-07-16 20:45:38+00:00): Je werkt met editor iD. Hoewel er al meer mogelijkheden zijn is de editor erg beperkt en een kliene ramp. Ik werk er nooit mee. In potlatch2 (ook simpel) kun je in de advanced mode gewoon velden toevoegen. Zet je door met mappen  ga dan over op editor JOSM. 

...editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710     
iD zal ook wel een advanced mode kennen. 
Ik voeg de velden nu wel even toe.  

.
eggie (2017-07-16 20:50:12+00:00): toegevoegd amenity= place_of_worship
religion=christian
denomination=roman_catholic

Je ziet dan straks de kerk ook donkerder gekleurd op de kaart.
Joyke (2017-07-17 20:56:27+00:00): Dank je. ik wist niet dat er meerdere editors waren. Gr. Joyke
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-18 07:27:27+00:00): Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only.
eggie (2017-07-16 11:33:53+00:00): Een skatebaan is geen fitnesscentre. 
Is de naam van het winkeltje ouderwets winkeltje? Winkels worden op de adresnodes getagd. 
Graag reactie. 


http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50322753

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-18 07:31:54+00:00): Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only.
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-18 07:36:50+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في تطبيق Maps.Me. 

شكرا
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-18 07:37:33+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا
michalfabik (2017-07-16 12:12:02+00:00): Pozdrav, u tag name ide lokalni naziv, tj. na bosanskom. Engleski naziv ide u tag name:en, tag name:bs ovdje nije potreban.
karitotp (2017-07-17 05:03:44+00:00): Hi gabideardales. Could you please confirm what kind of leisure is this "APARCAMIENTO,_ALQUILER_DE_EMBARCACIONES,_ETC_ETC" ? Thanks
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
*Martin* (2017-07-17 10:38:43+00:00): Ahoj Rick. Touto úpravou sa ti podarilo "zafarbiť" polovicu košického kraja "na ružovo". Viď. https://ibb.co/m7Q6fF. Opravu už nechám na teba (poprosím ASAP). Tiež ťa poprosím, aby si bol pri robení zmien veľmi opatrný. Ďakujem.
literan (2017-07-16 12:17:24+00:00): приветствую. Согласно вики, корректный формат написания телефонных номеров - +7 495 6905306 (с межд. и городским кодами, отделенными пробелами), поэтому не стоит их (пробелы) удалять. Я исправлю обратно.
literan (2017-07-16 12:17:45+00:00): а, вижу, что номер поменялся. Ну, тем не менее)))
eugene-lisovskiy (2017-07-16 20:51:39+00:00): Спасибо! Возможно баг был, я через предрелизную версию maps.me мапил.
eggie (2017-07-16 11:41:40+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-16 11:47:10+00:00): Je hebt hier een woonerf uitgebreid. Heeft het ook een naam?
name=radiostraat toevoegen?
Graag reactie
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
eggie (2017-07-16 11:52:52+00:00): Hier heb je een gebouw over andere gebouwen heen getekend. Dat is niet helemaal goed. 
Gebouwen worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG (overheid). Je doet dan een verzoek op het forum in het draadje Verzoek Bag-import
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
en je hebt in no time je nieuwe gebouw. Ik neem aan dat de andere gebouwen gesloopt zijn/
Graag reactie. Doe je zelf een verzoek.
Zet deze link er dan bij.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50323677#map=19/52.22967/5.18736
eggie (2017-07-16 12:02:05+00:00): Een school is in de Basisregistraties Adressen en Gebouwen (BAG) niet bekend. Het gebouw eronder is van 2012
Klopt het hier nu wel?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=eemnesserweg&resultOffset=0&objectId=0402100001621914&geometry.x=141359.07940307&geometry.y=471283.64458923&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0402010001621915
Constable (2018-02-12 11:41:16+00:00): this is definitely not a park, please stop vandalizing our map
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:29:24+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/50323828
dikkeknodel (2018-06-06 11:08:28+00:00): Hi Toroboro, 
Shouldn't the museum be tagged with tourism=museum?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 12:59:40+00:00): Has been updated in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59767020
Alecs01 (2017-07-16 16:00:54+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, is this a proper hotel or a private home? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4973457022 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4973457427
dieterdreist (2017-11-20 12:10:46+00:00): Hi Jonathan, you have added a Museum with the name "cementry" in the former slaughterhouse area in Rome Testaccio, what is this about? Did you mean to tag the "Macro Testaccio"?
eggie (2017-07-16 12:20:44+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-16 11:56:53+00:00): Oke... name:nl moet gewoon name zijn. de aanvulling nl wordt binnen Nederland alleen in Friesland toegepast. 
Verander je het zelf?
Víctor L (2017-08-19 14:04:03+00:00): El Río Perico es un río tipo anastomosado  o trenzado, por lo cual, corresponde que en su lecho se coloque natural=shingle, y no waterway=riverbank.
Antes de realizar este tipo de ediciones, quizás sea conveniente que consultes con quienes crearon estas ediciones.
agendagauchajujuy (2017-11-18 02:36:41+00:00): ok
bagage (2017-07-25 16:21:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Lors de ce changement, vous avez modifié la clé "name" de certains villages afin qu'elle contienne "nom français / nom occitant".
Cependant, la clé "name" ne doit pas contenir le nom occitant car ce n'est pas la langue officielle - si vous souhaitez que le nom Occitant s'affiche (name:oc), il faut utiliser un rendu spécialisé comme la carte Bretonne (http://www.openstreetmap.bzh/).

Merci de corriger les changements invalides.

Pour plus d'informations, voir https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2017-July/085038.html

Cordialement,
GUFSZ (2022-10-01 09:47:57+00:00): Von dir kommt vermutlich der Eintrag: wheelchair:description 	Vermutlich nur mit einem besonderem Schlüssel verwendbar
Es gibt einen Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3120824#map=15/50.1147/8.6866&layers=N
Bezieht sich vermutlich auf die Toilette.
eggie (2017-07-16 12:19:15+00:00): Nou.. je hebt het zelf al aangepast zie ik . 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50324608
Bedankt voor je reactie.
Op de adresnode kun je wel toevoegen name= CBS Avonturijn en amenity=school
evt. de website en Phone.
Alecs01 (2017-07-16 16:06:50+00:00): Hi, this was already on the map, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405343408 please do not duplicate existing objects
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
mueschel (2017-07-18 11:12:56+00:00): Hi,
Something went wrong here - you added your user name to 49 trees as a tag, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4973522973

Could you have a look?
Jan
Rayhan Hossen (2017-07-18 12:47:05+00:00): Hi Jan,

Thanks for your message.

I've just checked that changesets and yes, you're right. I don't have any clear idea but somehow I added my username as a tag on those trees. I'm gonna delete those tags.

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Rayhan Hossen
Alecs01 (2017-07-16 12:48:35+00:00): Thanks for the correction!
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
oormilavinod (2017-07-17 05:31:04+00:00): hey, Ratniex!! welcome to OSM. you have accidentally pulled a node causing a park feature to be pulled. Please be a little more careful while tracing  I have corrected the errors happy mapping !!
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
mavl (2018-06-13 16:00:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
highflyer74 (2017-07-18 05:36:56+00:00): Moin Rainer!

Schau Dir mal eben https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1064098515 an. Da hängen Informationen dran, die vermutlich da nicht hingehören.

Gruss aus HB!
oormilavinod (2017-07-17 07:14:56+00:00): hey 9VSKI, welcome to osm, i noticed that you have changed the tag of a park in OSM causing it to render badly on the map, please refrain from adding wrong data to the map. reverting the changeset have a nice day!1
user_6328178 (2017-07-17 07:33:36+00:00): hello oormilavinod, may I know a park designated by the local government should not have the tag of a park and considered as "wrong data", due to bad rendering in OSM.
mavl (2018-06-13 15:59:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-06-13 15:59:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-06-13 15:59:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-06-13 15:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-18 06:30:07+00:00): Is "Apartheid Street Gate" an actual name, or a politically motivated edit?

By the way, there's also this tag: military=checkpoint, which might be more appropriate for checkpoints.
marc__marc (2021-03-12 12:27:37+00:00): witch country ?
mavl (2018-06-13 15:59:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-06-13 15:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-06-13 15:59:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-06-13 15:59:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
M!dgard (2017-07-31 11:24:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50716986 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 10:29:31+00:00): Reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/50714656
RicoElectrico (2017-07-16 19:33:38+00:00): Że też ci się chciało tyle normalnych edycji robić tylko po to, żeby potem robić takie głupie żarty. Wycofuję to i piszę do DWG.
mavl (2018-06-13 15:59:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59812653 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].