piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EM311 (2016-10-05 11:17:42+00:00): Ich gebe zu, dass ich nach meiner Änderung merkte, dass auch die Haltestelle Luisenstraße anders heißt. Dann bin ich auf Suche gegangen und habe in den Fahrplänen der RNV gesehen, dass es jetzt "Weinheim Alter OEG-Bahnhof" und "Weinheim DB" heißen solle. Ich werde das in den nächsten Tagen vor Ort prüfen. Ich komme da zwar fast täglich vorbei, aber die Änderung ist mir bisher nicht aufgefallen. Ich melde mich. Danke fürs Anschreiben! Gruß EM311
EM311 (2016-10-05 14:08:27+00:00): Grundsätzlich würde ich den Ortsnamen jedoch nur in den alternativen Namen aufnehmen.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:56:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
jpxy (2016-10-04 08:37:01+00:00): Added buildings
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
jpxy (2016-10-04 08:36:16+00:00): Added buildings
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:56:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:24:04+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
rza31 (2016-10-05 10:43:57+00:00): Hallo myping,

willkommen bei OSM. Du hast bei den Häusern Hausnummern eingetragen. Notwendig ist jedoch mindestens Hausnummer + Straßenname, sonst ist keine Zuordnung für Navigations-Apps möglich. 

Die ungeraden Hausnummern habe ich als Beispiel schon ergänzt. ;-)

rza31
myping (2016-10-05 14:08:03+00:00): Das war mir nicht klar, also danke für die Information. Schon ergänzt.
FTA (2016-10-09 23:45:37+00:00): Wow, you surveyed over 500 addresses?! Crazy awesome!! We need to catch up here in Wisconsin...

If you don't mind me asking, what system do you use to keep track of the addresses? I've been playing around with different phone apps, field papers, and digital notepads for address surveying, but just haven't found a solution that satisfies me enough in the ease balance between surveying and later retrieving.

Happy Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA
TechSanity (2016-10-10 11:26:57+00:00): I've been using the application "Keypad-Mapper 3", disabled any use of compass (doesn't work on my phone), and shortened the distance it places the address nodes. 

Procedure-wise I just slowly coast by on a bike and type in each house number. Afterwards, I import into JOSM, add a satellite imagery layer, manually adjust the position of each node by the satellite imagery, and add street name info, and submit.
FTA (2016-10-11 03:40:51+00:00): Awesome, that's one I haven't looked at before so I will check it out! With the popularity of Pokemon Go, walking around a neighborhood holding up a cell phone draws much less attention than a legal pad on a clipboard :). Cheers!
MAnthes (2016-10-04 09:20:05+00:00): Location of the Arangieskop hut was wrong. Now it's correct.
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:24:09+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-10-04 14:10:37+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Arztpraxis auf einem Parkplatz? Ich verschiebe es mal zur existierendenden Hausnummer 3 und korrigieren dann auch mal die Öffnungszeiten (siehe auch wiki.openstreetmap.org)
André Kürten (2016-10-04 20:00:43+00:00): Vor Allem Frauenarztpraxis ;) ...das wäre mal was - auf'm Parkplatz.Tja, keine Ahnung warum das auf dem Parkplatz gelandet ist.Den Punkt hatte ich eigentlich auf dem Gebäude gesetzt. Vielen Dank fürs Koorigieren.
Gluespurion (2017-10-22 12:18:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1181966

Kann man den Blitzer so mappen? note=beidseitig wird nur 2 mal auf der Welt benutzt. (siehe overpass turbo)
R0bst3r (2017-10-22 12:36:29+00:00): Hallo dadosch.
Du weißt, dass note nur eine Notiz für Mapper ist? Keine Eigenschaft. Die weltweite Häufigkeit spielt also keine Rolle.
Erfassen kann man einen Blitzer so.
Man kann natürlich auch beliebig viele Relationen anlegen, die dann aber nur wenig Mehrwert bringen und schwer auswertbar sind. Bin kein Fan davon, ich mag es lieber einfacher. 
Es liegt also an dir was du daraus machst.
Viele Grüße
Gluespurion (2017-10-22 12:48:35+00:00): ok, ich verstehe, was du meinst. Habe mich nur gewundert, dass der Blitzer als enforcement von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41761660 nicht mehr so da war :)
MKnight (2017-10-22 12:57:53+00:00): so wie der Blitzer erfasst ist, kann man ihn nicht auswerten, da er theoretisch überallhin blitzen kann, bspw. in den Fussweg hinein ;)

Natürlich sollte da ne Relation (bzw 2 in dem Falle) dran
R0bst3r (2017-10-22 13:01:15+00:00): Kann er ja auch :)
Wer will kann ja auch die Höhe, Breite, Koordinaten, Farbe, Material, Operator usw. erfassen. Ich werds nicht tun. 
Schönen Sonntag noch!
MKnight (2017-10-22 13:01:22+00:00): Oh, nettes CS, riecht schon fast nach Vandalismus...
R0bst3r (2017-10-22 13:02:12+00:00): Klugscheißer :P
MKnight (2017-10-22 13:34:47+00:00): Naja, wenn Du Dinge nicht erfassen willst, weil sie Dir zu kompliziert oder zu blöd sind, ist das Dein Bier. Alle halten das so.

Wenn Du aber Dinge löschst, weil sie Dir zu kompliziert sind, wie da offenbar geschehen, dann ist es eben nicht Dein Bier, sondern Mist.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-22 21:52:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53163385 where the changeset comment is: Revert deletion of enforcement relations without a proper reason. &quot;I don\'t like difficult tagging&quot; is no reason to delete other mappers work.
Nakaner (2017-10-22 21:55:53+00:00): Ich habe den Revert wieder revertiert, weil er nicht mehr notwendig war. Dennoch bin ich der Meinung, dass das Löschen der Relationen nicht in Ordnung ist. So funktioniert OpenStreetMap nicht!
Luuuddooo (2016-10-04 22:48:13+00:00): Bonjour,

Je suis de nouveau pas d'accord avec vos modifications. Vous avez apparemment déplacer les routes et les bâtiments en vous basant sur les images aérienne Bing mais malheureusement elles sont très décalée ici.
Pour vous en convaincre vous pouvez regarder la position du point géodésique du clocher de l'église dont la position est très précise: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/669982078

Il faudrait plutôt que vous utilisiez les images aériennes de "BDOrtho IGN" dont l'alignement est bien mieux corrigé (elle sont disponibles sous JOSM, 

Pour vérifier l'alignement d'une couche de photo aériennes vous pouvez afficher la couches des traces GPS "Strava Vélo". Elle montrent bien que les images de la BDOrtho IGN sont bien mieux alignées que celle de BING.

Coridalement.

Ludo.
Marych_ (2016-10-04 11:05:30+00:00): Разве с Мустакиллик на Аккурганскую поворт разрешен?
PlaneMad (2016-10-05 19:11:17+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!

Noticed that you deleted all the shops in Phoenix market city that was added with a lot of hard work by another mapper.

https://osmcha.mapbox.com/42625531/

I'm going to restore the shops, but please make sure you are more careful in the future.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:52:04+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:51:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mapper999 (2016-10-05 09:44:41+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tags of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445670852 . What type of shop is it?
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:03:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
Firefishy (2016-10-04 14:07:42+00:00): I am unsure what you are doing, but you seem to be making some very bad edits.
Firefishy (2016-10-04 14:17:58+00:00): I think it likely best I revert (undo) this changeset, you have made the R399 a straight road which it is not.
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-04 14:25:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42631157 where the changeset comment is: revert edit mistake, see discussion in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42627423
maciek-szn (2016-10-04 12:13:04+00:00): Drzewa są dobrze naniesione, to trawniki trzeba przenieść na właściwe miejsca.
SammysHP (2016-10-10 08:59:52+00:00): War es beabsichtigt, alle Tags von Knoten 1787434997 zu löschen, den Knoten selbst aber nicht?
 
Das Tagging des Bücherschranks habe ich ergänzt.
b-jazz (2017-09-30 19:54:06+00:00): The following way shouldn't be tagged as "access=no" IMO. Can you confirm please? I'm going to revert it to be open access.
b-jazz (2017-09-30 19:59:00+00:00): Or maybe this is a lane only for buses and that is why it is access=no. If that is the case, I'm confused about the parking lot being a one-way road with no apparent way to exit without going into the bus lane. I'll hold back on any change until I can survey or hear back from someone.
Sanniu (2017-10-10 06:12:21+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445679142 - is it roundabout?
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:25:07+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-10-04 14:16:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think you live in the middle of parking slot.
lenochod (2024-08-19 15:11:37+00:00): Ahoj.
Máš správně adresu u COOP konzumu v Prášilech? ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3881197560 ) Je totiž na budově s jiným číslem popisným.
Lukáš
Kudej (2024-08-19 21:03:47+00:00): Ahoj,
dle RÚIAN je adresa POI opravdu chybná, díky. Atributy adresy jsem smazal.

Na místě jsem byl již před velmi dlouhou dobou, po brouzdání na netu to vypadá, že prodejna COOP tam již není, nevím, jestli se tam jenom nevyměnil provozovatel (jiný prodejce), dal jsem tam fixme.

Je v Čechách nějaká širší shoda, jestli je žádoucí do POI přidávat adresy a s jakými atributy?
Taky jsem si všimnul, že do POI nepřidáváš(odstraňuješ) ref:ruian:addr. V posledních letech se editací OSM zabývám dosti okrajově.
lenochod (2024-08-20 12:16:10+00:00): Shoda zda adresy do POI napříč komunitou není, část maperů je pro část proti.
Proto při aktualizaci adresních míst se do POI adres nešahá a vytvoří se adresní místo nové. Ale nemaže se u POI ref, což je chyba, neb by se mělo vyskytovat pouze jednou a to na adresním místě místo u POI.
Firefishy (2016-10-04 14:14:06+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Nice mapping. Enjoy.
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:25:15+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Firefishy (2016-10-04 14:14:16+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Nice mapping. Enjoy.
user_870861 (2016-10-08 06:49:21+00:00): hi,
this changeset and older one 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41374597)
adresse are  duplicated
issues can be see at
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#layer=Mapnik-osmfr&zoom=17&lat=45.448156&lon=-75.58563&item=1230
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-08 12:45:37+00:00): We are currently working on a project with stats can to input all addresses and building footprints in ottawa, these addreses will be merged down with the building footprint. Please be patient as we are only 3 working on it for the time being
user_870861 (2016-10-08 13:34:41+00:00): no problem for me, i've just see that 
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/graph.png?source=12558&item=1230&class=3&start_date=2016-10-06
and i just want to warn you in case you did not know.
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-08 17:25:49+00:00): Thanks though, I'll concentrate on fixing this area monday
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-12 18:28:51+00:00): Duplicates should mostly be gone now, If there are any others left, they will be merged with the building footprints
Firefishy (2016-10-04 14:14:23+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Nice mapping. Enjoy.
Firefishy (2016-10-04 14:29:38+00:00): PS: Maps.me (Free cellphone app) allows you to add / amend too. The maps it comes with are update around once very 2 months.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-24 19:45:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44650611 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
mapper999 (2017-05-15 18:42:52+00:00): I removed the name as it seemed unofficial. If this name is commonly used or even official, please provide more information and use the correct spelling with capital first letters.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-11 07:44:08+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I'm guessing that the area where the two radio masts are https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445702269 isn't a building and isn't a shop?  I'm guessing that you were looking for something involving "radio" and that's what the iD editor suggested?
The two masts are already mapped (as man_made=antenna, which may not be the best tag) so presumably the area around it is just a fenced-off area - maybe "landuse=commercial" would work here?
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just trying to help - any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
ijsb (2016-10-06 20:30:47+00:00): Hoi MrKooken, bedankt, ziet er inderdaad compleet uit! Een klein aandachtspunt: aan de zuidwestkant van het parkeerterrein overlappen twee wegen (445702312 (oneway) en 284826484 (geen oneway)) elkaar voor een deel.
74523978 (2016-10-16 21:01:04+00:00): Bedankt ijsb, het euvel is verholpen.
plamen (2016-11-06 08:02:34+00:00): farm -> farmland
mavl (2016-10-04 18:11:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Сокращения в OpenStreetMap не используем. Пишем полностью «Новый переулок». Буквы в номерах домов указываем большие (8А).
user_599436 (2016-10-21 12:48:30+00:00): What kind of feature are you trying to map called "The Mansion"? It doesn't appear to be a typical hotel open to the public.
gpstracks (2016-10-04 16:39:31+00:00): According to internet images, it seems the correct tagging for the "Jamarski bivak" shelter would be :

shelter_type=basic_hut

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dbasic_hut

without
winter_shelter=yes
(This is a tag for alpine hut to indicate that it has winter room)
ortotorto (2016-10-04 20:32:19+00:00): You are right, thanks!
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:25:21+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user2981 (2020-01-19 13:28:26+00:00): Do you remember if the building:height tag you added here refers to the outer 5-story part or the inner 8-story part?
Polarbear (2017-06-21 21:54:47+00:00): Hallo, bei Straßenumbenennungen (hier way 9424059) kann der alte Name als old_name= bzw. mit Datum old_name:FROM-UNTIL= erhalten bleiben. Habe das beim ehemaligen Heuweg mal so gemacht. 

Viele Grüße
Firefishy (2016-10-05 07:37:28+00:00): Great first edit to OpenStreetMap! Happy mapping ;-)
ajashton (2016-10-15 19:53:56+00:00): There seem to be a lot of issues with this data. Many of the addresses duplicate data that was already in OSM. In other cases this one changeset includes redundant data. For example, you added 4 nodes for this 1 address:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4431044818
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4431044819#map=19/45.26627/-75.93767
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4431044820
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4431044821

Same for many other addresses in that area.
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-15 20:07:36+00:00): You can thank Ottawa for that. We are currently working on a project with Statistics Canada (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada#Crowdsourcing_buildings_with_Statistics_Canada)
We needed to add addresses and building footprints. Our second pass (after adding addresses(from Ottawa) and building foot prints(from Ottawa)) is to merge both together.
Example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42916632
and 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42915900
Their project is going live the 17th of October and could possibly be very beneficial to the OSM community as it will ask the community to add building details such as building levels and other useful attributes. Please be patient while we are actively adding this data in anticipation of receiving crowd sourced data. This is a pilot project. If we do other cities, it will be much more organized and with better data.
ajashton (2016-10-15 20:17:51+00:00): The information at this wiki link (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada#Crowdsourcing_buildings_with_Statistics_Canada) is extremely sparse - is there more complete process documentation somewhere? The same import deleted hundreds of buildings I mapped by hand in Stittsville and I don't see a significant increase in quality from the Ottawa data. The usual import process would have been to keep or update the existing features rather than clearcutting.
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-15 20:21:47+00:00): Ottawa's building traces are more accurate and are more accurately aligned instead of aligning to Bing. Statistics Canada is supposed to be the ones responsible for the documentation
scruss (2016-10-17 20:20:05+00:00): … which doesn't mean you can go ahead before it's written and agreed.
smaprs (2016-10-05 11:13:16+00:00): Thank you FvGordon
Elizabeth Kelly (2016-10-04 16:01:44+00:00): I plotted what looked like farm fields
kreuzschnabel (2019-12-06 20:29:06+00:00): Hallo cede_goar, bitte keine Straßennummern ins name=* setzen. Da gehören nur Eigennamen rein, und wo die Straße keinen hat, bleibt das Feld ungesetzt. Die Straßennummer steht ausschließlich im ref=*. Danke!
user_5359 (2016-10-04 19:16:50+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Die Adresse Riegelerstraße 1 liegt auf der anderen Straßenseite
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87396382 ! Und wenn es tatsächlich ein Metzgerei ist, dann bitte noch ein shop=butcher hinzufügen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 11:20:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32203512/history has access:hgv = delivery that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using hgv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/hgv/&***/access%3Ahgv/
jc86035 (2016-10-05 11:49:02+00:00): Hi, you seem to have removed a lot of valid data by HelioFelix. The tags were "ele=*" and "natural=peak", which are both valid. I don't know what you're seeing.
jc86035 (2016-10-05 11:54:18+00:00): I will be reverting the 15 of your changesets, where you (for some reason I don't know) removed elevation data from peaks and troughs, at some point
vasinlo26 (2016-10-05 16:20:31+00:00): yup, they maybe valid data, but as you see, the whole map was surrounded tag showing how height they are, i told you this is unnecessary to show it on the all trails inch by inch