piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mikini (2016-04-28 09:15:08+00:00): Den nye placering af node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/342361634 (Tjæreborg Stationsvej 33) er ikke korrekt. Den fysiske bygning ligger i hvert fald på den gamle lokation.

Selv om jeg er gammel i gårde i OSM, er jeg ikke helt opdateret på hvordan importen fra AWS foregår, så jeg er i tvivl om hvordan jeg skal håndtere denne situation.
Hvor er det rigtige sted at rapportere? Kan se at elgaard har en fejl/modifikations-liste på https://github.com/elgaard/OpenStreetmapAddressData, men er det data AWSbot vil tage hensyn til? Det er ikke umiddelbart klart.
Ville det ikke være smart om man på AWSbots brugerside (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AWSbot) kort forklarede om botten, og henviste (om muligt) til gældende dokumentation om import-proceduren? Så er folk der kigger changesets ikke helt efterladt i mørket.
woodpeck_repair (2016-04-28 11:59:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38948622 where the changeset comment is: bot moved locations to 0,0 - reverted
2maxic (2016-04-28 17:37:01+00:00): Приветствую. Не совсем понял зачем два отношения для 65К-4103000? Быть может я не владею информацией и у 65К-1901000 с этой дорогой есть общий участок. Ориентировался на наименования подъездных дорог, в частности 65К-1901140, 65К-1901150, 65К-1901160 и др.
letihu (2016-09-21 20:59:56+00:00): please fix 61 to 105
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3721560784/history
Hjart (2016-09-21 21:16:13+00:00): This is an import from a public database . It will be fixed when it's fixed there.
AsgerFrank (2016-09-23 09:57:36+00:00): I've just submitted these issues of the public database (DAR) to the authority (Geodatastyrelsen via FIP)
sorcrosc (2016-04-28 11:38:46+00:00): Attenzione, siete tre persone ad inserire le stesse cose sovrapposte
sorcrosc (2016-04-28 21:58:11+00:00): Ho rimosso i duplicati, rivisto i tag assegnati ai vari oggetti ed inserito il percorso escursionistico come relazione
sorcrosc (2016-04-28 11:38:31+00:00): Attenzione, siete tre persone ad inserire le stesse cose sovrapposte
Margherita Bruscolini (2016-04-28 12:47:50+00:00): In questo caso quale dei tre verrà pubblicato?
sorcrosc (2016-04-28 13:18:02+00:00): Sono già "pubblicati" tutti. Quando si fa una modifica questa è subito disponibile a tutti ed anche visibile sul sito (dopo pochi minuti)
Vedete voi se potete sistemare tenendo le cose migliori, altrimenti faccio io stasera
Grazie
sorcrosc (2016-04-28 21:58:34+00:00): Ho rimosso i duplicati, rivisto i tag assegnati ai vari oggetti ed inserito il percorso escursionistico come relazione
sorcrosc (2016-04-28 11:38:38+00:00): Attenzione, siete tre persone ad inserire le stesse cose sovrapposte
sorcrosc (2016-04-28 21:58:22+00:00): Ho rimosso i duplicati, rivisto i tag assegnati ai vari oggetti ed inserito il percorso escursionistico come relazione
Thunder08 (2016-07-20 20:06:00+00:00): Вандальна правка. Була ж українська мова.
Supaplex (2016-04-28 13:02:58+00:00): 您好：

OpenStreetMap社群大半依事實狀態(de facto)繪圖
臺灣這邊的mapper，會將你的變更改回來，相信其他地方的社群成員也會認可
這邊在進行臺灣名稱的討論
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/47439/china-and-taiwan-names
目前比較傾向用common name來標，但還在憑聚共識
如果有其他意見請過來這邊討論
謝謝
Владимир К (2016-04-28 21:23:02+00:00): Просто лайк за островки газонов) набережная прямо заиграла
elazarev (2016-05-04 11:03:18+00:00): Спасибо:) после картовстречи весь парк заиграл, приятно смотреть
mavl (2019-01-11 17:01:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
yuryleb (2016-07-24 18:52:55+00:00): Это публичная карта, не стоит сюда добавлять свои отметки
Polarbear (2016-04-28 14:42:39+00:00): Hi, highway=minor is deprecated, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features. 

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414149745 is either a highway=track or a highway=service, probably plus service=driveway.
glglgl (2016-11-15 10:46:34+00:00): Wer auch immer "FriKlara" ist: nach dieser Änderung ist die L 258 einem stetgen Wechsel zwischen secondary und tertiary unterworfen. Durchgehend gleich wäre da sicherlich besser.

Ist die denn von der Verkehrsbedeutung so wichtig, dass von der üblichen Leitlinie "Landesstraße 2. Ordnung = tertiary" abgewichen werden sollte?
tkoval83 (2019-06-21 14:59:20+00:00): Вона не двостороння для машин
Там одна полоса тільки для транспорту
apm-wa (2016-06-18 07:34:36+00:00): Do not delete or change to another language the Russian versions of street names in the name:ru field.  Не удаляйте или меняйте на другой языл названия улиц на русском языке когда находятся в поле name:ru
marczoutendijk (2016-04-29 15:38:41+00:00): Heeft het cafe ook een naam?
trigpoint (2016-04-29 16:07:42+00:00): Please keep your changes within sensible areas, large areas such as this make peer review by local mapper very difficult.
Thanks Phil
DannyAiquipa (2016-05-03 23:52:27+00:00): Hello Phill, I'll be more careful , thanks for your comment.
iWowik (2016-06-22 16:25:49+00:00): Кабановский сельский Совет объединен с
Новомарковичский сельский Совет
http://news.21.by/society/2014/02/04/877034.html
yaugenka (2016-06-22 17:59:57+00:00): Спасибо за информацию. Ваша помощь в   соответствующем обновлении карты приветствуется.
Chris Fleming (2016-05-05 10:06:09+00:00): I'm struggling to see the point of this "fix". Also it's bad form to delete and recreate a way (loosing the history) just to add a small "kink" into the road that I don't believe exists on the ground?
samely (2016-05-05 12:43:03+00:00): Hey there!  I can see in the satellite imagery that this road exist, this road was self intersected forming 0º. You can clearly see this solved error if you revert the changeset.
Polarbear (2016-05-13 17:43:14+00:00): Hallo FWwa, amenity=youth_centre ist veraltet (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2399288099). Bitte verwende amenity=community_centre und community_centre=youth_centre und ggf. community_centre:for=juvenile
neuhausr (2017-01-03 17:09:46+00:00): Hi, just a friendly reminder that in OSM street names should be fully spelled out, even street type or street directions that are typically abbreviated. For example, "Xeon Street Northwest" instead of "Xeon St NW"
whb (2023-10-31 11:22:05+00:00): Guten Tag,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4153762672

Hierbei handelt es sich um eine Grundwassermessstelle.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grundwassermessstelle

Viele Grüße
whb
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:19:40+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414211324
has no tags. What is it?
Max-- (2017-03-27 13:16:46+00:00): Just a tack that I forgot to tag from bing satellite image when I mapped some stuff in the area earlier this year. Fixed it, thanks for spotting it!
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:03:03+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47201516
rab (2016-04-28 16:58:56+00:00): Hallo,
meiner Meinung nach sollte ein Wohngebiet die Fläche eines gesamten Dorfes oder Weilers repräsentieren. Wenn es nur um einzelne verstreute Behausungen geht ist es sinnvoller die Gebäude einzeln mit building=yes zu erfassen.
cadsauxk (2017-07-23 13:11:00+00:00): Olá Colega

só relembrando: track é trilha de uso agrícola, estradas rurais normalmente são unclassified quando estreitas e tertiary quando largas.

abraço
Ning Lu (2016-04-28 16:48:39+00:00): This needs a lot of work.
derredu (2016-04-29 09:56:24+00:00): Hallo sulagaloh,
mehr Grün, schön, aber um jeden Preis?
Ich habe mir erlaubt deine Bing-abmalerei der Realität anzupassen, weil ich mich in der Ecke gut auskenne:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=38976787
Am Meisten habe ich mich über den Naturwald an diesem Weg gewundert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28907488
Dort stehen eine paar höhere Büsche beidseitig des Weges, das wars!
Auch abenteuerlich finde ich die Ausdehnung der Wiese über diesen gepflasterten, 2m breiten Fußweg:
28907484
Das Bing-Luftbild zeigt hier eine schwarze Fläche vom Schattenwurf der Bäume! Wie kommst du darauf das da Wiese ist?
Merke: Weniger ist manchmal mehr.
Gruß, Rene
sulagaloh (2016-04-29 16:21:25+00:00): Hi Rene,
schon lustig, sonst bin ich immer derjenige, den es stört, wenn sich landuse=meadow quer über Bundesstraßen und Gehölzflächen spannt.
In Mülheim hat mich der weiße Fleck in OSM neugierig gemacht, ob da z.B. Industriebrache ist. Aber ich habe eine Fuß- und Radwegverbindung durch's Grüne gefunden, das sollte OSM auch zeigen. Verfeinerungen sind dabei immer möglich und gerne gesehen, aber bitte ohne erhoibenen "Merke!"-Zeigefinger. Danke & Gruß  sulagaloh
jaakkoh (2016-06-17 16:04:59+00:00): Hi Gary,
Great to see so much of your mapping in Nicaragua!
A comment regarding your change of the small bridge at the South end of Calle la Sirena: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407761466/history and with that about use of or more so changes to existing tags more broadly.
Please note that the tag highway=pedestrian is used for "roads used mainly/exclusively for pedestrians in shopping and some residential areas which may allow access by motorised vehicles" (as http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Special_road_types notes). This implies that the road could/can technically be used for cars and other vehicles. 
This is not the case for the narrow bridge in question nor for the path South of that bridge.
My more generalized comment about changing tags is that it's of course always good when the current tag is not correct or when another tag would be better (which are two slightly different things). But it's also a good rule of thumb to not change things that one doesn't know well. In such cases it's better to ask: either the person that had mapped the object(s) before or then at some OSM forum/channel (such as tagging@opensptreetmap.org or #osm IRC or something alike. A local or regional email list is always also a good place for any issues in the area.).
The above noted, it's been really great to see you map so much in such a short time. It's always especially great to see people put such a lot of work on mapping details of objects, all the things requiring ground survey.
If you're still in the country it'd be great to meet in person. I'll send a separate note to you about the possibility of that.
Happy mapping!
Владимир К (2016-05-08 08:43:31+00:00): Часы уже обозначены другой точкой. ВАшу я удалю. Вы считаете что эти часыжейстивтельно являются достопримечательностью? Если так, то я добавлю это свойство уже отмеченным часам
luiswoo (2016-04-29 04:43:09+00:00): Ну надо же «Петровский тракт», а не «тракт Петровский»… Самостоятельно без принуждений.
dr&mx, будешь опять палки в колёса ставит, при очередной попытке привести в нормальный вид наименования улиц Волгодонска, или нет?
dr&mx (2016-04-30 16:11:48+00:00): я против
luiswoo (2016-04-30 19:46:10+00:00): Против чего?
«вул. Петровський шлях» (улица Петровский тракт) — такой же канцелярский уродец как и «проспект Боготяновский спуск» и «улица 1-я линия» в Ростове. Хотя не так давно, было несколько иначе https://yadi.sk/i/qjkBW3KTrQsCo.
SomeoneElse (2016-05-03 12:24:11+00:00): While "Fixing minor highways that contains impossible angles" does explain what you were changing it doesn't say where, and this changeset is huge!
Luis36995 (2016-05-10 17:24:54+00:00): I was fixing short issues. However, I think because of the internet speed issue, I could have mistaken some layers. I will be careful next time. Thanks for your feedback
Luis36995 (2016-05-10 17:25:20+00:00): I was fixing short issues. However, I think because of the internet speed issue, I could have mistaken some layers. I will be careful next time. Thanks for your feedback
Fabe56 (2020-09-04 13:30:36+00:00): Est-ce qu'il s'agit des ruines de la chapelle de Sainte-Appoline ? J'ai été sur place mais rien vu. Mais il faudrait explorer avec plus d'attention au vu de la végétation présente. Sur Géoportail dans les photos aériennes ils semblent y avoir un bâtiment qui y correspond mais c'est au nord du chemin.
Free_picks (2020-09-07 08:38:37+00:00): Non, ce sont les ruines d'une ancienne habitation.
J'ai créé un nouveau point pour indique l'ancien emplacement approximatif de la chapelle, proche de la pierre remarquable de 1812
tyr_asd (2016-07-31 08:34:40+00:00): Hi. Zur Info: Ein User sagt in http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/649678, dass es Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414229257 nicht exisitert oder zugewachsen wäre.
Hb- (2023-05-25 07:11:32+00:00): Der Gärtitzer Bach unterquert die A 14 in einem Durchlass. Daher die Brücken und Abschnitte w414230891 bis w414230894 wieder gelöscht in #136528606.
Pizzabolle (2016-04-28 18:32:47+00:00): *Det skjedde faktisk på Nebbejordet, jeg beklager
Commodoortje (2016-05-02 06:29:58+00:00): Op zich goed gedaan.
Ik mis de amenity=parking
Het lijkt mij dat de servicewegen geen Deijlerweg heten.
Commodoortje (2016-05-02 06:31:18+00:00): Het is ook hier (altijd) verstandig om dit voetpad en de servicewegen los te koppelen van het bos. De nodes van landuse dienen niet versmolten te worden met highway.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414235456
Sanniu (2016-11-28 11:34:17+00:00): Missing object kind - from OSMOSE. Can add more descriptive attributes to this point?
catoblepa (2016-04-28 22:24:38+00:00): Il nome corretto del bar è "3 bar's".
MKnight (2016-04-29 09:47:10+00:00): Heisst der wirklich Brötchenladen? Wer ist operator?
kuchengrab (2016-04-29 15:17:37+00:00): Heißt laut Schild wirklich so. Inhaber weiß ich nicht, kann ich aber herausfinden.
user_5359 (2016-04-29 20:31:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
aaaKey (2016-04-30 02:32:40+00:00): Ok.
MKnight (2016-05-14 11:02:20+00:00): Moin, wenn Du Häusschen zeichnest, so achte doch bitte darauf, diese auch korrekt zu verbinden. JOSM wirft for dem Uploa auch Warnungen, warum ignorierst Du die?

Betrifft bspw.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414260903

Ich korrigiere das gerade.
roschitom (2016-05-14 16:16:26+00:00): ich weiß nicht was du willst, das verlinkte Gebäude hat von mir laut Chronik gemeinsame Punkte mit den danebenliegenden bekommen.
Ich habe bis jetzt so 90.000 Gebäude bearbeitet. Seit ich JOSM benutze korrigiere ich auch jedes mal die Gebäudeverbindungen die als Warnung angezeigt werden. Es sind auch bei vielen Verbundenen Gebäuden auch mal 2 bis 5 Fehler zu berichtigen.
Ich hoffe du hattest nur mal einen schlechten Tag.
MKnight (2016-05-14 16:43:49+00:00): Ich schreib nich aus Langeweile CS-Comments.
Da Du viele Gebäude malst habe ich Dich angeschrieben, ich korrigiere eben viele Gebäude ... so 10-20000 Stück die letzten Monate, und da mir da regelmässig Dein Name vorkommt...

das verlinkte Gebäude in Deiner Version: 
https://www.picflash.org/picture.php?key=YHVUY7&action=show

Die anderen Gebäude von Dir, die ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39309308 aufm Schirm hatte such ich jetz ma nich raus... (und nein, ich hab nicht nur Dir hinterhergewischt...)
geri-oc (2018-07-14 12:54:09+00:00): https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=101&error=45131728&zoom=14&lat=50.95958&lon=13.53036&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C20%2C60%2C360&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0
geri-oc (2018-07-14 12:57:05+00:00): Hier wurden Wasserwege (vor 1 Jahr) eingetragen ohne bestehende Wege-(vor 4 Jahren) kreuzungen zu bearbeiten.
VOR ORT gewesen?
JanisJf (2016-04-28 22:19:17+00:00): Changelog fail....
naoliv (2016-07-21 13:59:59+00:00): Visconde, aqui nesse lugar https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-22.45964/-44.44132 o trevo foi todo alterado?
SomeoneElse (2016-05-11 19:38:56+00:00): Can you please explain what "ISO 3166-1 standard does not define Kosovo as a state" has to do with OpenStreetMap?  
The OSMF position on "what is a country" in OSM is described at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  It's also been discussed over at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=29724&p=3 .  Please don't make border changes without prior discussion with the other mappers involved in an area.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
naoliv (2016-08-10 18:59:40+00:00): Anderson, você criou vários objetos duplicando informações que já existiam no mapa, vários inclusive no mesmo local (e cada um com uma classificação)
Anderson Heiderich (2016-08-11 14:43:32+00:00): Tentei ajudar nas localizações, peço perdão por não saber usar o Maps. ME
naoliv (2016-08-11 14:51:39+00:00): Sem problemas.
Se você tiver interesse em participar da comunidade, tirar alguma dúvida ou conversar sobre algo, a gente tem vários meios de comunicação

Dá uma olhada em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact

Tem lista de e-mail, fórum de discussão, grupo no Telegram, etc
Abraço!
chillly (2016-04-29 09:15:12+00:00): To make businesses work you need to add the tags for the business not just the name. This would be amenity=kindergarten.
Warin61 (2017-06-27 00:32:00+00:00): Humm 
Relation for Boondall Wetlands;

has no tag for what it physically is ... say natural=wetland
 includes an area leisure=common .. 

?? is the leisure=common part of this wetland ... then move the tag natural=wetland off the larger outer way on to the relation.
Warin61 (2017-06-27 00:38:33+00:00): There is also a shared segment in the relation. That needs to be addressed.
reubot (2017-06-29 03:20:47+00:00): Thank for informing me, I have fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49906364
5m4u9 (2016-04-29 06:10:09+00:00): gracias por mejorar el mapa y las rutas.

He creado la Ruta Nacional 12 (Oruro - Pisiga) con ref=F12. No es necesario añadir F12 o variantes como nombre ya que es redundante. Cualquier software obtendrá ref=F12 y mostrará. Si es posible añadir nombre de avenidas o calles en pueblos.
5m4u9 (2016-04-29 06:11:18+00:00): Me olvidé, si tienes trazas GPS propias nos gustaría que lo subas a https://www.openstreetmap.org/traces especificando en los tags el tipo de transporte, pais, depto, y tipo de movilidad. Más trazas GPS nos ayudan a mejorar precisión de las vías.
chillly (2016-04-29 11:21:39+00:00): I think this a building name, not a business name. Building names should go in the addr:housename tag, not the name tag. This allows a building and a business to both have their names added.
Eugene13 (2016-05-15 22:35:36+00:00): Yes, this is Building name.
Kagami (2016-04-29 04:31:20+00:00): 你覺得合適，我可不這麼覺得
中華民國是最大公約數，沒改成台灣已經很客氣了
Supaplex (2016-04-29 04:29:47+00:00): 這次編輯並未經過討論，將直接回退

This is a undiscuss edit, it wiil be revert directly
Supaplex (2016-04-29 04:36:19+00:00): 另外，應當以事實上(de facto)狀態來標示名稱，以在地人的稱呼為主
Supaplex (2016-04-29 04:37:37+00:00): Another point is, is should be de facto status to name the place, and use the locals name
5m4u9 (2016-04-29 06:12:53+00:00): gracias por editar el mapa.

Tenemos un acuerdo entre los que editamos de añadir el tipo de vía por delante así sabremos el tipo para otros fines.

ej: Calle Sucre.
whb (2016-05-01 10:18:50+00:00): Das Tagging ist seltsam.
Wie sind denn die Wege beschildert?
user_5359 (2016-04-29 17:14:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The name changed really from Thibodaux Regional Medical Center to Home ? Or it is a private information?
BayouBoy (2016-04-29 17:27:56+00:00): I was correcting a mistake. There never was a hospital at that location. Thibodaux Regional Medical Center is located on North Acadia Road, not Choctaw Road.
user_5359 (2016-04-30 06:30:08+00:00): Okay, if this is a normal residential building, please delete the information amenity=hospital, and the phone number (no private information) and the name=Home. Please add a building=yes to the node.

If you need help: you are welcome!
Allroads (2016-12-04 17:43:48+00:00): View over town is not a name!
name look at osm wiki.!!
Why 3 times tourism
viewpoint.
Can you clear this.
mavl (2016-04-29 16:54:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление информации в OpenStreetMap. Я взял на себя смелость исправить опечатку в теге name: ростеликом -> Ростелеком, а также удалить адрес с этого офиса, потому что этот адрес совпадает с адресом дома, в котором этот офис находится [http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4154758493/history].
Jothirnadh (2016-04-29 05:54:51+00:00): Why did you delete the buildings in this region? Any reason behind this?
saikabhi (2016-04-29 06:20:07+00:00): I have observed that in your recent changesets you have been deleting perfectly good buildings from OSM which are present in satellite imagery. Can you please give any reason why you have deleted these buildings? Also the changeset comment says "Mapping missing roads around Gurgaon,New Delhi"; while in reality you are deleting buildings. Can you change the changeset comment to better reflect your changes? Thank you.
MKnight (2016-09-05 13:02:53+00:00): Moin, Du bist bei den Öffnungszeiten hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118962408 in diese Falle: https://github.com/opening-hours/opening_hours.js/issues/87 getappt, ich habe es korrigiert.
thetornado76 (2016-09-05 13:32:30+00:00): Besten Dank!
FredrikLindseth_import (2016-04-29 07:37:49+00:00): This changeset was suposed to be uploaded by the _import-user.
FredrikLindseth_import (2016-04-29 07:51:41+00:00): This changeset was suposed to be uploaded by the _import-user.
FredrikLindseth_import (2016-04-29 07:51:50+00:00): This changeset was suposed to be uploaded by the _import-user.
chnav (2016-05-01 06:03:24+00:00): Сударыня, у вас всего две правки и в обеих вы что-то удаляете - сначала снесли обозначенный микрорайон, а затем здание гостиницы. Пожалуйста будьте аккуратнее.
Supaplex (2016-04-29 08:44:33+00:00): 除了停車場出入口、和大學裡的研究中心，其他學校都重覆標示了，有圈出範圍了
poornibadrinath (2016-11-21 06:06:05+00:00): Hi Yuwei Huang,
  I came across your edits and noticed you have created bus stops, hostels, parking spaces with the school tag. Please note, only the main school building and class rooms can be marked with school tag. Rest all the amenities can be marked with their own appropriate tags. Please change the tags of the points that are not the school. Please refer to OSM tagging info: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags. 
Thank you,
Poornima Badrinath
Supaplex (2016-11-21 15:41:28+00:00): fix all the wrong duplicated node
Shoorick (2017-09-15 11:07:09+00:00): Класс дороги определяется её ролью, а не покрытием. _Улица_ Известковая — residential
dgitto (2018-05-29 10:59:39+00:00): A Viterbo molte strade residenziali e carrabili sono mappate service + alley. Ma tante non sono sicuramente "narrow service roads" come il tag significherebbe
Dino Michelini (2018-05-29 11:10:01+00:00): Non capisco a quali strade ti riferisci in particolare; mi puoi fare qualche esempio, grazie
dgitto (2018-05-29 11:33:33+00:00): Ma ce ne sono circa 80. Via delle Caprerecce, Via Macel Maggiore, Via San Tommaso...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277478013
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33837690
Dino Michelini (2018-05-29 11:58:41+00:00): Sono vicoli del centro storico medievale entro le mura. I quartieri medievali a Viterbo sono due: San Pellegrino e Piano Scarano e le strade per la maggior parte sono vicoli a senso unico dove una macchian e pedone fanno fatica ad entrarci. Tu sei di Viterbo?
dgitto (2018-05-29 12:21:55+00:00): Non sono di Viterbo. mi sembravano troppe tutte quelle strade di servizio.
Se controlli con overpass Milano, Bologna, Terni, Perugia, Firenze ecc, non viene usato mai highway=service. 
In base alle discussioni sulla mailing list italiana, direi che in tanti casi si tratta di highway=residential
dgitto (2018-05-29 12:24:47+00:00): A maggior ragione nei centri medievali, il termine alley è meno utile di quanto lo sia in una cittadina tedesca o USA. Ma è il value "service" che non convince