piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
atcomapper (2017-04-20 04:30:47+00:00): Hej Hjart

Tak for din kommentar - jeg sætter pris på tips & tricks.
Kan du ikke lige forklare mig, hvorfor polygoner helst ikke skal dele noder med vejkanter? Jeg tænker at det umiddelbart giver to fordele, at de har delte noder:
Topologimæssigt vil det være nemmere for rutealgoritmer at finde en gyldig adgangsvej til f.eks. en P-plads, i stedet for at skulle gætte på at en nærliggende vej giver adgang.
Renderingsmæssigt er det pænere, at en P-plads på alle zoom-niveauer grænser helt op til en vejkant, uden noget synligt mellemrum. Hvis polygonen tegnes med et mellemrum til vejkanten, vil det på nogle zoom-niveauer se ud som om, at den grænser helt op til vejen, mens der på andre niveauer vil kunne ses et mellemrum.

Vh. Jonathan
Hjart (2017-04-20 17:47:01+00:00): Selvfølgelig kan jeg forklare det :-)
For at give et eksempel kan jeg nævne en gut der for nogle år siden kortlagde buslinier i hovedstaden. Der var et antal landuse=residential polygoner, som i stil med p-pladserne her var klistret på diverse små og store veje og en del af disse klippede han så fejlagtigt op flere steder og inddrog endda flere af disse stykker i buslinje-relationerne.
De lokale opdagede formentlig aldrig uheldet og jeg opdagede og rettede det først længe efter.
Det man først og fremmest kan lære af dette er at vi (i sagens natur) har en masse bidragsydere med meget forskellig grad af teknisk forståelse/erfaring og at man overhovedet ikke kan regne med at folk vil opmærksomme på at vejnettet evt deler noder med en landuse polygon af en eller anden art. Jeg vil også kunne nævne eksempler på folk der har problemer med at finde ud af at adskille polygoner fra vejnettet, når de vil redigere det ene eller andet.
Selv for mere end almindeligt rutinerede folk som f.eks. undertegnede har det ofte vist sig overordentlig besværligt at redigere vejnet der har hængt sammen med diverse landuse ligesom jeg finder det langt nemmere at tjekke om vejnetttet hænger rigtigt sammen, når det er adskilt fra p-pladser osv.
Så dels sker der alt for let uheld når vejnettet deler noder med polygoner og dels gør det evt skader meget sværere at opdage og rette.
Commodoortje (2017-04-19 21:40:33+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
elgolfo (2017-05-07 07:15:14+00:00): full revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48467300 da nahezu alle infos der kirchen gelöscht wurden
mavl (2018-12-25 21:08:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
MKnight (2017-06-01 20:48:31+00:00): Di-Di?

Kannst Du die Öffnungszeiten korrigieren?



(Nach Schema übrigens mit englischen Abkürzungen)
mavl (2018-12-25 21:44:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:18:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:26:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
elgolfo (2017-05-07 07:11:00+00:00): gelöschte tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48467232 wiederhergestellt, abkürzungen ausgeschrieben
mavl (2018-12-25 19:43:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:36:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
highflyer74 (2017-04-20 14:13:25+00:00): Hallo maeve!

Handelt es sich hierbei sowohl um das Rathaus als auch um eine Touristeninformation? Auch sind Dir beim Mappen ein paar Tippfehler unterlaufen. Sei so nett, und melde Dich kurz, damit wir den Eintrag entsprechend verbessern können.

Viele Grüße aus HB!
maewe (2017-04-20 16:27:40+00:00): Hallo!
Es gibt dort neben dem Rathaus eine Tourist-Information.
VGmaewe
maewe (2017-04-20 16:29:37+00:00): Die Web-Adresse ist
http://www.touristik-palette-hude.de/
highflyer74 (2017-04-25 12:09:11+00:00): Hallo! Danke für Deine Antwort. Ich passe es entsprechend an.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
robert (2017-05-01 23:54:01+00:00): Did you mean to delete "Fenwick Common Lane" in this edit? It broke a match with OS Locator: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=279784
mavl (2018-12-25 20:31:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:35:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:58:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:55:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
gsperb (2017-04-20 07:46:14+00:00): Die Bahn fährt? Das muss aber unterirdisch geschehen!
Für den Bahnkörper gilt:
Disused ist geschmeichelt. Bei diversen Strassenübergängen existieren die Schienen nicht mehr. Eine Wiederinbetriebnahme ist nicht möglich. Schienen und Gleisbett müssten vollkommen neu aufgebaut werden. Die Streckenführung als StUB wurde 2015 verworfen.
Folglich ist die Bahauptung die Bahn würde fahren vollkommen aus der Luft gegriffen!
gsperb (2017-05-07 17:32:07+00:00): Ich habe keine Ahnung weshalb immer wieder jemand diese schwachsinnige Behauptung aufstellt. Auf dieser Bahnstrecke KANN nichts fahren weil sie teilweise nicht mehr existiert.
Ich lese das nicht nur "irgendwo" sondern bin Anlieger
mavl (2018-12-25 19:37:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:14:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:53:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:23:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:53:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:29:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:20:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:28:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:09:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:45:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
jumbanho (2017-04-20 11:23:57+00:00): Yes that is annoying, there are also a lot of names that are descriptions in the RST area.
katpatuka (2017-09-07 13:38:50+00:00): Hi ff5722,
Can you supply information about the source of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488086908 ? The roads you added around 马庄 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5086085106) are somehow different from roads viewable on imagery...
ff5722 (2017-09-07 15:11:34+00:00): It's from Sentinel-2 imagery like it says. Although the resolution is not high enough to be 100% sure, i suspect that around the village you mention the road was straightened recently, Sentinel-2 is usually up to half a year old for the most recent usable imagery.
katpatuka (2017-09-07 16:39:36+00:00): Is there a Sentinel layer available for use with josm (and other editors) ?
ff5722 (2017-09-08 03:33:06+00:00): Use these 2 guides, it can be done in a few minutes once you have done it a few times before. I'm on holiday now otherwise I'd gladly do it for you.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ff5722/Using_Sentinel-2_imagery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ff5722/Using_local_tilesets_as_background_layer
ff5722 (2017-09-08 03:35:35+00:00): I think this is the geoTIFF file i used for here, so you can start from the second guide right away
https://pan.baidu.com/s/1pLulZnH
katpatuka (2017-09-08 04:42:18+00:00): Hm - that doesn't look like an easy way for beginners - download this and that... The pan baidu link shows a 404 not found btw

But thanks anyway ;)
ff5722 (2017-09-08 23:38:25+00:00): The link should work, try to refresh it once.
You can view it directly as an image too if you want to verify my edits.
katpatuka (2017-09-09 04:57:20+00:00): No - whatever I try I only get a 404. Anyway: imagery of Tianditu (see wikiproject China) is better for reservoir mapping.
eggie (2017-04-19 22:20:09+00:00): NL:G11  met hoofdletters.
de N nog even verbeteren denk ik..
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47949293
Dalkvist (2017-05-15 08:15:19+00:00): Hej är Svanehov inbyggt nu? Det ser inte ut att vara en byggnad på flygbilderna men de kan ju vara flera år gamla.
Warin61 (2017-04-20 22:58:22+00:00): Removed crossover and connection to roundabout. 

Don't know that this is an official 'park'.
zstadler (2017-09-28 07:28:17+00:00): Hi,
.
In this edit you have added 2 turn restrictions: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7169265/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7169266
.
The turn restrictions were incomplete as they did not have "to" and "from" ways.
.
I've fixed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52433939
eggie (2017-04-19 22:16:42+00:00): Hoi.. probeer wel je commentaar synchroon te houden aan je edits. Dat is makkelijker voor andere mappers.
Wel de smaak te pakken zie ik. Mapse verder.
eggie (2017-04-19 22:21:47+00:00): Goed bezig... even gekeken.
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-20 06:02:10+00:00): Hi  Cristocracies,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added a landuse = recreation_ground tag to the feature which already mentioned as park. This is inappropriate according to OpenStreetMap. Can you check and give a appropriate tag to the feature.

Best,

Upendra.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-05 09:30:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction.  Attempts to contact the mapper have failed.
rab (2017-04-19 19:35:17+00:00): deleted after 5 minutes
Commodoortje (2017-04-19 21:53:00+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-04-19 21:58:54+00:00): Inlineskate route (Bosdijkroute) verlegd naar het nieuwe fietspad en Kievitsweg verwijderd.
Gras aangesloten op bomenrij en watertje aangebracht.
.
Dank voor je 1e edit!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-05 09:30:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction.  Attempts to contact the mapper have failed.
MKnight (2017-04-19 22:04:28+00:00): Moin,

wie kommst Du bei Pho auf outdoor_seating=no?
jonnius (2017-04-20 19:13:46+00:00): Weil ich dort war und es keine Außensitzplätze gab. Liegt vielleicht aber auch an der Jahreszeit...
MKnight (2017-04-20 19:26:24+00:00): Zumindest, das letzte Mal als ich da vorbei bin, standen da Tische und Bänke draussen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-05 09:30:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction.  Attempts to contact the mapper have failed.
eggie (2017-04-19 22:29:36+00:00): Hi.. Es isst möglich die Häuser importieren zu lassen durch unser OSM forum.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=642036#p642036
Versuch BAG update mit hyperlink dabei .
Deutche Sprache isst kein problem.
hadw (2017-05-04 10:02:56+00:00): Please be more careful to look what is already mapped before you make changes.  Someone has already had to reverse your change of some woodland in a park to being just a park, and I'm about to remove three unnamed nodes that correspond to parks that are already mapped as areas.

Some of your other changesets look wrong, e.g. marking what could, at best, be graffiti, as tourist attractions.  Normal criminal damage should not be mapped at all.

You also seem to have moved a footpath so that it crossed roads, when it was already accurately mapped, according to Bing.  Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I would have to assume that you believed a GPS receiver at time of poor coverage, over what was already mapped.

Some people are treating these as malicious, although I'm hoping it is just a case of inexperience.  See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=644517#p644517

If you can explain what you intended to do(probably best done on the forum), someone can help guide you in how to do it properly.  Also, as noted in that thread, there is a large OSM community in Derby that you can meet in person, as long as you are allowed in a pub.
Wulfmorn (2017-04-19 19:41:38+00:00): Its a good start. Keep adding! :)
Commodoortje (2017-04-19 22:01:32+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-05 09:30:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction.  Attempts to contact the mapper have failed.
SomeoneElse (2017-05-03 12:37:14+00:00): Can you explain what "Old Ben" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4804532628 is?  It's a while since I've walked down here but I don't remember anything at the end of this path.
Best Regards,
Andy
hackerb9 (2017-08-20 00:43:37+00:00): What? Is this some sort of historical designation? I live not far from the Space Needle and it is definitely not broadcasting TV. It wouldn't make sense for it to do so as there is a big hill directly to the north (Queen Anne). Seattle's TV towers are at the top of Queen Anne, not the Space Needle.
Andras Fabian (2017-08-21 18:41:35+00:00): Well, I am not disputing your objection, as indeed the tower does not fulfill much communication functions.
But I am sure we agree on the fact, that from its function and even more so its form, it has to be clearly distinguished from classic buildings. And if there is no special classification to it, the some 3rd party renderers / users (in my case the flight simulator X-Plane) might simply start depicting it as a "skyscraper" (which it is definitely not). So, it is important to make clear ... this building is definitely not a "classic" building. 

After further investigating OSM's options, I propose the following change (and will just do it on this object):

Change, man_made=tower and tower:type=observation

I think this should be indeed a more fitting tagging (and should still fulfill the need to make this tower distinguishable via its tags).
trigpoint (2017-04-20 18:10:26+00:00): Hi, please could you add some more detail to the artworks. A pub car park is an odd place for an artwork.
Thanks Phil
Derby45 (2017-04-28 09:06:43+00:00): Phil, I think this person is just messing about. There are a few changes by this person in the area. I have just cleaned up a set of paths that have been dragged all over the place in this users changeset, also with Artwork randomly placed that doesn't exist.
SomeoneElse (2017-05-03 12:39:24+00:00): I've never been to that pub but I've commneted on another one that I don't think exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47950670 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-05 09:30:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48420321 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Pokemon-inspired edits and other fiction.  Attempts to contact the mapper have failed.
geoaria (2017-11-19 15:56:14+00:00): 
shahrood
Your changes are unhappy with the current situation in this area. Please do not make such changes.