piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
M!dgard (2018-01-18 12:17:55+00:00): When opening a road, make sure to remove the construction=* tag from it too (you leave construction=tertiary on the road here).
arconaut (2018-01-18 12:21:37+00:00): Oops, sorry
mavl (2018-12-25 20:03:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:29:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
joost schouppe (2017-04-26 10:29:30+00:00): Hoi AbcNc,
Bedankt voor al je bijdragen, fijn om nog eens iemand véél te zien doen in Antwerpen!
Je gebruik van village_green is hier niet juist, check eens [de definitie op de wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green). Op de luchtfoto gezien zou ik zeggen dat het gewoon kleine parken zijn?
AbcNc (2017-04-26 10:41:49+00:00): De afbakening tussen klein park, village green, weide en zelfs plein is me niet altijd even duidelijk :) Beginner hier. Het gaat vaak om een beetje gras of zand, een struik of twee, misschien een boom en een speeltuinelement... dan weet ik soms niet goed wat kiezen. Het plan is inderdaad dat het tussen de torens parkjes worden, maar hoe het er nu (in het echt van op de begane grond) uitziet vind ik het niet veel meer dan een paar struiken en dus village greens ;) Pas gerust aan.
warangal (2017-05-27 20:01:14+00:00): Hi Mr. Ryan,

please make sure, that you don't accidentally shift other points. This has happened to the [railway crossing](http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/82706674).
I can recommend the JOSM editor (https://josm.openstreetmap.de) for more sophisticated editing tasks.

Best regards
mavl (2018-12-25 20:09:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:10:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-04-25 06:10:10+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
literan (2017-04-25 10:04:54+00:00): заправка сжиженным газом - и тег зарядной станции для электромобилей? не надо вносить хлам, пожалуйста, на общей карте.
chillly (2017-04-25 12:43:36+00:00): Why did you delete the pond? There is a pond there, not quite where the new mapper put it, but that's a newbie mistake. Does it really deserve to be deleted? I think this is heavy-handed
DannyAiquipa (2017-04-25 14:08:50+00:00): Hi Chilly,  I deleted this pond based on Satellite imagery, because it does not show clearly, but I will revert my changeset if this is convenient for you.
DannyAiquipa (2017-04-25 14:10:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48126491
chillly (2017-04-24 20:14:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM
Thanks for checking the bus stop. It was imported into OSM from an open data source called NaPTAN. This certainly has some errors, so it is good to see someone checking. One thing you might like to change is that when you are happy with the tags, change the naptan:verified = no to yes, so others know it has been checked. You might have to look at the 'All tags' at the bottom of the left column to find that.

HTH
xmd5a (2017-04-24 22:34:22+00:00): Добрый день. Можно поинтересоваться, откуда вы берёте адресные данные?
chadbunn (2017-04-24 22:56:09+00:00): How do you know this is fictional?  I live here and will verify, but want to know how you were able to determine its authenticity.
DannyAiquipa (2017-04-25 14:23:32+00:00): Hey there ! Chadbunn I have reverted my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48126794
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:13:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:12:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:49:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
bhousel (2017-04-24 21:03:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Looks like you added it twice, so hope you don't mind if I delete one of them..
nammala (2017-05-04 06:57:23+00:00): Lot of buildings with no tags. It would be great if you can go ahead and tag them.
Mike Baggaley (2017-04-30 11:33:12+00:00): Hi, following this and associated changes there are a number of ways that now have highway=motorway, but still have ref=A8 (e.g. way 439078382) should these be M8?

Cheers,
Mike
tms13 (2017-05-03 20:50:54+00:00): I've just reviewed it all, and I only had a couple to fix.  I also updated the E16 route relation through this section to use the new motorway.
Polarbear (2017-06-02 23:29:43+00:00): fexlo, du hast hier unterschiedliche, spezifische Grünflächen auf leisure=park vereinheitlicht. An manchen Stellen hast du Teilflächen von Parks wiederum als Park getaggt, so z.B. die Grasflächen innerhalb des Parks am Gleisdreieck. 
Das Changeset wurde revertiert in 49209833.
derdritteachim (2017-06-02 23:48:54+00:00): Danke für die Korrekturen. Teilweise wollte ich den Tag "village_green" korrigieren, da er nach http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=village%20green?uselang=de nicht in Städten benutzt werden soll. Speziell in Neu-Tempelhof sind das m.E. eher Parkflächen.
Polarbear (2017-06-03 13:25:43+00:00): Ja "village_green" ist wegen der britischen Bedeutung umstritten. Aber nicht jede Mittelstreifenbegrünung oder Grasecke vor einem Haus ist deswegen ein Park. 
Das sollte man in Berlin z.b. für Flächen verwenden, die das dreieckige Schild "Geschützte Grünanlage" tragen. 
Ansonsten ist landuse=grass + landcover=grass besser, Bäume kann man inzwischen einzeln als natural=tree oder Baumreihe =tree_row dazu zeichnen. 
Und wie gesagt aufpassen ob es sich um eine Detailfläche eines grösseren Parks handelt, dann wird die Eigenschaft des Details getaggt.
t_ja (2017-04-25 17:29:28+00:00): Ahoj,
mam zopar pripomienok:
1) addr:country ma obsahovat iba dvojpismenovy kod, t.j. "SK" a nie "Slovakia".
2) pridavanie bodov s nazvom (t.j. tag "name") bez urcenia, o co sa jedna, nie je moc prinosne. Nemam moc skusenosti s mapovanim zeleznic, ale podla wiki by som Novu a Staru Harfu otagoval ako http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dyard a rusnove depo ako http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Engine_Shed . Na opravovnu sa mi zatial nepodarilo najst vhodne tagovanie (nieco v zmysle "wagon repair", a podobne). 

Inak pekna praca, len tak dalej :)

T.
marton_tud (2017-05-05 13:19:49+00:00): Ďakujem. Pokúsil som sa to napraviť. Ináč, neviem či je dobré už teraz zobrazovať polohu budúcej zastávky "Žilina predmestie", resp. polohu budúceho údržbového centra ZSSK v polohe bývalej zriaďovacej stanice.
ToeBee (2017-06-26 15:05:33+00:00): Hey there. I just noticed that this changeset seems to have removed the building=university tag from Ahearn and the Natatorium. I'm guessing it wasn't intentional but rather the editor software removed it when you applied the sports center preset. I'll fix it here in a few minutes. I might try to reproduce it and open a bug with iD too...
SomeoneElse (2017-11-09 11:49:34+00:00): Not sure how it happened, but a node got added in the Pacific in this change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4814186894/history :)
SomeoneElse (2017-11-25 15:52:44+00:00): I've deleted it.
ToeBee (2017-05-08 17:20:12+00:00): Thanks for fixing this vandalism. There were a couple of other tags on the parking garage that I just restored as well. (the fact that it is a building and a multi-level parking facility) I also removed the fake monuments added by the same user.
JeSe-MX (2017-04-25 20:15:26+00:00): 000 no puede ser comentario para un conjunto de cambios.

favor de agregar una descripción en sus próximas edicones, agregando en Comentario, una descripción de las ediciones que se hicieron.
JeSe-MX (2017-04-25 20:23:53+00:00): procurar que las estructuras o areas queden dentro de las calles, no sobre ellas ni que las atraviesen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489162339#map=19/19.36183/-99.04934

vea ejemplo:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315781069
Superadlen (2017-04-27 14:35:07+00:00): merci kho la3ziz https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmdz/
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 20:32:53+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=regional,
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4814361674/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=regional
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
carciofo (2018-01-14 20:21:23+00:00): Hi, regarding way 489170464, could you check the maxheight attribute you added to it? 15" seems like an impossibly low clearance. Thanks
nammala (2017-04-25 06:47:48+00:00): Can anyone from the local knowledge please verify the area and see the edits are ok or not. I see a lot of roads which are traced and not present in the Imagery and also some parks which are not present. It would be great if the local mappers can verify and map this area. It looks somewhat crowded.

Best Regards,
nammala
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:25:18+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Viajero Perdido (2017-04-25 00:47:05+00:00): Aha!  Pre-existing natural=water on the surrounding lake was the problem.  I knew that was discouraged, but left it alone because there were no warnings from JOSM, and it was also properly on the relation.

But that breaks some maps apparently, including OSM Default.
SafwatHalaby (2017-04-26 06:16:58+00:00): It appears you removed some fire zones in Israel. Is this an accident?
SafwatHalaby (2017-04-26 06:23:00+00:00): My bad. They are still part of a multi-polygon. Sorry.
tonyf1 (2017-04-25 01:38:53+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM. It looks like you are adding things that don't exist to get Pokemon spawns. Please only add real features.
tonyf1 (2017-04-25 01:36:39+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM. It looks like you are adding things that don't exist to get Pokemon spawns. Please only add real features.
Dalkvist (2017-04-25 08:18:55+00:00): Hej, kul att du har förbättrat kartan i Finspång, det ser bra ut. Gissar att du hittade osm via pokemon med ditt fokus på parkerna :)

Några små tip/kommentarer: skogsdungar i parker kan man tagga med landcover=trees och layer=1 för att visa att de är i/över parken. Vill man vara riktigt detaljerad kan man använda natural=tree för enskilda träd och natural=tree_row för rader med träd.

Vi brukar bara använda footway på ställen där det är skyltat med bara gångväg, på gång- och cykelbanor brukar vi använda cycleway eller path med bicycle=designated och foot=designated

Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.
eggie (2017-04-25 06:52:41+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-25 06:57:36+00:00): Michel. ..Een park ligt helemaal los over de landuse heen zonder ergens aan te plakken. Leisure= park is een soort transparant. Eerst hoort de landuse ingetekend te worden.. bos, gras, scrub e.d Vervolgens bij een echt park met naam gaat Leisure park erover. ook over het water. 
Leisure is de functie wat je er doet.. landuse is wat je ziet. Ik zie ook bomen in het water nu.
eggie (2017-04-25 07:00:25+00:00): Zomaar een eiland tekenen in water heeft geen zin. Zoiets moet in een zgn multipolygoon -relatie liggen. Je zal er niets van op de kaart zien. Water en alnd moeten dus gescheiden worden en dat kan alleen maar met zo'n MP.
Zal wel even kijken .. wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
In het begin volgen we startende mappers .. ook om te helpen.
eggie (2017-04-25 07:22:29+00:00): Het boseiland zal nu gaan renderen want het staat in een multipolygoon relatie met het water. (water is outer en het eiland is inner)  Met editor potlatch2 is dit erg lastig te doen. Het kan wel. Het stadsgroen "moet" je niet als park taggen, maar als grass of evt. landuse=village_green. Dat gebruiken we voor gemeentegroen. 
Niet elk stukje groen is een park. Hier van dit water zou ik dus ook geen park meer maken.
Er is de laatste tijd veel schade ontstaan door al die parken. (Pokemonedits)
eggie (2017-04-25 07:24:24+00:00): Rendering duurt even..
eggie (2017-04-25 07:28:58+00:00): Het paadje in het groen  bij de Suurhoflaan zat niet vast aan de omliggende wegen.Wel aan het "park".  Nu wel aan de weg.
eggie (2017-04-25 07:35:33+00:00): In de plantage en het Julianapark heeft ook iemand de landuse grass e.d. gewist. Mooie klus om dat weer terug te brengen.
Michel Spruit (2017-04-25 15:39:15+00:00): Dank je voor de feedback eggie. Ik zal de documentatie eerst eens doornemen.
eggie (2017-04-25 16:21:39+00:00): Michel kijk ook op het forum van OSM. 
Daar zit de knowhow.. Zelfde inlog.. Je kunt je evt, voorstellen onder het draadje Welkom.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
PlaneMad (2017-04-26 10:29:56+00:00): Nice work adding the bus stops!
Warin61 (2017-06-26 01:14:44+00:00): highway=road is meant to be temporary .. as in unknown type of road. 
The LPI base Map can be used to determine road types .. these would be tracks/unclassified. Edited. They might be service, service=driveway if you see then that way too.
kimo (2017-04-25 02:44:17+00:00): Description should be "update bike path surface". Can change descriptions be updated one submitted?
nevw (2017-04-25 12:05:36+00:00): I don't believe so.
NetWormKido (2017-04-26 02:10:19+00:00): OpenStreetMap не место личным заметкам! Откатил
nammala (2017-06-22 10:44:12+00:00): Hi RecklessRivers,

Noticed that you have changed the tag of pipeline to stream . OpenStreetMap is the real map of the world. make sure you add ground truth data not fantasy data.

Best Regards,
nammala
Dr Kludge (2017-04-27 14:42:25+00:00): BicentM,  Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Those are some great first edits.  Keep up the good work.
andi9876 (2017-04-29 02:06:01+00:00): Dear, please stop add viewpoints. Remember, this is for everybody visible!
KR-KRKR-KR (2017-04-25 05:03:16+00:00): copy&paste misclick, only 1x
user_5486069 (2017-04-28 01:01:47+00:00): Thanks! I think this was an edit I made. I'm still a bit confused about what exactly qualifies as a tertiary road. Any chance you could point me to an example of it being used correctly?
btwhite92 (2017-04-28 01:33:08+00:00): Hi Phil,
Road classification in OSM can be deceptively tricky - the trunk/primary/secondary/tertiary/unclassified system is built around the U.K. road network, and unfortunately it tends to line up awkwardly with U.S. roads which use something more like a major/minor highway/arterial/collector kind of system. 

A tertiary road should have some kind of navigational importance, albeit a minor one. If I had to point to some of the roads I am most confident around here being labelled tertiary, roads like Mesa Park, Las Brisas, Kings Row, Wedekind, Neil Rd. around Peckham come to mind. Unclassified is a better choice for roads in commercial or industrial districts that provide access to properties, but aren't used for through navigation. 

If you have any questions at all about this topic, don't hesitate at all to contact me. Thanks for the work you have been doing as well, it's rare to have contributors in the U.S. with the attention to detail you're showing. 

Bradley
Dalkvist (2017-04-25 08:02:33+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 
Några tip/kommentarer: 
När man karterat saker som bara har raka hörn, framförallt byggnader, så är det svårt att få det 100% rätt på fri hand. Det finns ett verktyg i editorn som gör det åt en, i ID som du använt har det kortkommandot “s”, finns också i menyn när man klickar på en linje.

Om det bara är en affär i en byggnad så kan man sätta alla taggarna på byggnaden och ta bort punkten

Så att du tog bort och drog om en skogsväg, på flygbilderna ser det ut att vara något där men det kanske bara är en stig. I så fall är det bättre att ändra den till highway=path än att ta bort den.

Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.
DasMapMan (2017-04-25 09:11:44+00:00): Tack för tipsen! Jag hjälper gärna till och förbättrar OSM till det bästa av min förmåga.

Det som syns på fotot där skogsvägen tidigare var ritad är en telefonledningsgata. Det går en stig längs denna men den är bara en liten djurstig. Tänkte att dessa inte borde ritas ut.
Dalkvist (2017-04-25 09:31:45+00:00): ah telefonledning, tänkte inte på det. Om folk använder den så kan det vara värt att ha med den, finns flera taggar som talar om hur bra en stig är https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-25 05:48:25+00:00): Hello Gaspera,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's great that you are adding more details to the park. But leisure_1, Leisure_2 tags doesn't exist and not conventional. You can add the particular details as description though. Reverting the tags you added. For better understanding you can follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide Happy to help.

Regards,

Upendra.
PT-53 (2018-09-30 07:18:53+00:00): Hallo Hoschmi72,
für diesen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/302916693 zeigt keep right diesen Hinweis an:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/302916693
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
Hoschmi72 (2018-10-01 07:11:19+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

das war ja nur ein völlig nutzloser Node. Den hättest du doch auch einfach löschen können. Wäre das nicht einfacher gewesen?

Grüße
PT-53 (2018-10-01 07:24:51+00:00): Woher sollte ich wissen, daß Du da nicht doch was eintragen wolltest ?
Hoschmi72 (2018-10-01 07:40:47+00:00): Das Changeset ist jetzt über ein Jahr alt. Wenn ich da noch was eintragen wollte, weiß ich es selber nicht mehr :-)
Vulcanodong (2017-04-26 06:38:32+00:00): stop editing road back to primary! the road condition is up to date! national road is all trunk road!
Vulcanodong (2017-04-26 06:38:23+00:00): stop editing road back to primary! the road condition is up to date! national road is all trunk road!
ligfietser (2017-04-25 09:25:47+00:00): Beste hkoopman,
Allereerst welkom op OSM. Je hebt echter een adres toegevoegd op een gebouw, dat is niet de bedoeling. De adressen zitten nl al op een node en worden rechtstreeks geïmporteerd uit het BAG: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2781216186
ligfietser (2017-04-25 09:28:00+00:00): changeset reverted
Vulcanodong (2017-04-26 06:38:15+00:00): stop editing road back to primary! the road condition is up to date! national road is all trunk road!
Hjart (2017-04-25 07:28:37+00:00): "unnecessary tags"?
Sorry, but I guess I'll have to revert this one.
Upendrakarukonda (2017-04-25 17:11:58+00:00): Hello Hjart,

I uploaded the changeset comment accidentally. Thought it is not picnic_site through imagery. Thank you for pointing this and bringing back the data. Apologies for the immediate deletion. 

Regards, 

Upendra.
Hjart (2017-04-25 19:04:46+00:00): It's ok. Shit happens. If you open JOSM's imagery menu here and select our national imagery "Geodatastyrelsen" you'll be able to see the picnic site. Bing which is a few years out of date just shows fields.
Vulcanodong (2017-04-26 06:38:08+00:00): stop editing road back to primary! the road condition is up to date! national road is all trunk road!
fkv (2017-05-07 03:40:02+00:00): Please don't do these type of so-called corrections. The multipolygon was already correct, you just made everything more complicated. When you think that a multipolygon like this is incorrect, contact the local mapper who did all the work mapping it, instead of botching it.
jcy (2017-05-09 07:02:40+00:00): Sorry, but the multipolygon is incorrect.
The problem are the three parts of the forest that are completely surrounded by the inner paths. 
See eg the way 448462938 which should be both inner and outer (depending which part of it one takes) for the multipolygon.  
See 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=15.77242&lat=47.73476&zoom=16

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Areas#Way_in_.3E1_rings

Can you please correct it yourself?
fkv (2017-05-09 07:50:19+00:00): This is a bug in OSMI which does not consider that special case of touching inner rings (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Touching_inner_rings) that has recently been discussed in the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:multipolygon#Touching_inner_rings_forming_hole). Even the skeptics (e.g. user wolfbert) have so far agreed that this kind of mapping is permitted and that applications have no problems with it. Feel free to take part in the discussion in the wiki. As an OSMI user, you may also wish to file a bug report to its developers.