piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zorae (2020-03-28 16:28:37+00:00): Das Moos hat auch in der heutigen Form noch charakteristische geologische Eigenschaften eines "fen". Steht zB auf Wikipedia:
» Zu Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts fanden massive Eingriffe in den Wasserhaushalt durch Entwässerungsmaßnahmen statt. Dennoch ist der Mooscharakter noch weitgehend erhalten.«
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freisinger_Moos

Es geht also beim Moos nicht nur um die offensichtliche Landnutzung, sondern mEn auch um weniger sichtbare Eigenschaften des Bodens und der Flora.

Ich verstehe aber dass du den Entwicklungsplan als Quelle für die Ausdehnung nicht glaubwürdig findest. Wenn es dich stört darfst du das Moos von mir aus erstmal wieder aus OSM entfernen. Ich suche dann bei Gelegenheit noch ein paar Quellen raus und spreche mit Expert*innen. Wenn du willst halte ich dann nochmal mit dir Rücksprache, wie sich die historischen und heutigen Eigenschaften des Mooses sinnvoll auf OSM darstellen lassen.
murxer010 (2020-03-29 13:06:55+00:00): hi Lukas, mir, als OSM-Anfänger, sind die objektiven Kriterien wie dieses Gebiet gemappt werden sollte unklar; scheint auch Ansichtssache zu sein. Bleibt für mich die offene Frage: Kann eine Kulturlandschaft (Wiesen, Felder, von Menschen gepflanzte Wälder) gleichzeitig ein Moor sein?
zorae (2020-03-29 13:19:49+00:00): Ich war gestern noch länger im Gespräch mit einer Expertin, die bereits Kartierung von Flora, Fauna und Geologie im gesamten Gebiet des Freisinger Mooses durchgeführt hat. Sie konnte mir bestätigen, dass das Moos trotz der weitgehenden Trockenlegung noch heute wissenschaftlich korrekt als Niedermoor bezeichnet wird und sich dies in der Beschaffenheit der Böden und der Tier- und Pflanzenwelt spiegelt. "Kann eine Kulturlandschaft gleichzeitig ein Moor sein" ist demnach eindeutig mit Ja zu beantworten. mMn ist das Tagging-Schema von OSM hier noch nicht nuanciert genug. Ich halte natural=wetland+wetland=fen zwar weiterhin für richtig, aber der entwässerte Zustand sollte zB mit "managed=*" dargestellt werden.
oba510 (2020-02-07 05:39:06+00:00): Did the bricks get removed?
Pitartal (2020-02-08 15:38:42+00:00): According to the bing cards, it seemed that there was asphalt all over the street (a shadow was falling, it was hard to see). The maxbox shows that I was wrong.  Fixed.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-10 19:06:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181479929/history - czy są jakikolwiek ślady tych torów w terenie?

Czy są one do skasowania?
ma-rt-in (2020-02-07 11:19:28+00:00): Hallo,
der tag access=bus brauchst du nicht zu setzten, da bereits bus=yes gesetzt ist. Zudem ist access=bus einfach nur falsch!
Bitte korrigieren.
vg
ma-rt-in (2020-02-07 11:24:49+00:00): Und noch was der tag motor_vehicle=bus_only gibt es nicht! Bitte wieder den ursprünglichen Zustand herstellen, da dieser auch vor Ort so steht.
mueschel (2020-02-07 18:02:50+00:00): Hi,
you added the new tag 'Codice SPN' several times.
Could you change this to a common tagging scheme, i.e. ref:spn=...?
Thanks!
eggie (2020-02-06 13:36:05+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. Normaal gesproken wordt er op de adresnode bijgetagd, maar het gebouw zelf was hier al gebruikt voor tagging.
Wel nog de spatie in de postcode weghalen.
MVG,
Eggie
yadathot (2020-02-06 12:56:25+00:00): Added Service Roads as Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.
Warin61 (2020-02-07 08:49:07+00:00): Hi,
Suburban boundary data cannot come from imagery. What is the source of this information?

The name of the lake cannot come from imagery. What is the source of this information?
vakulya (2020-02-10 20:10:17+00:00): Hi Warin61,
Data came from public Subiaco LGA papers, this
https://www.subiaco.wa.gov.au/getattachment/d97ad336-9211-4fa9-9a1b-5b6d895b9d22/Attachments-Special-Council-Meeting-8-August-2017
and this
https://www.subiaco.wa.gov.au/getmedia/38b2ef03-b595-4ad6-a655-6bae45260497/Heritage-Place-Record-Jolimont-Conservation-Area.aspx
Best regards, 
vakulya
Warin61 (2020-02-11 07:45:21+00:00): Note ... ther is a copyright notice at the bottom of their first web page ... do you have permission to use their date?

Note 2 ... the suburban boundary is not closed... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.80979&lat=-31.98572&zoom=12
Warin61 (2020-02-11 07:51:18+00:00): See also
https://www.subiaco.wa.gov.au/Privacy-and-Disclaimer
that has 
Copyright notice

The material produced by the City of Subiaco on this website is protected by copyright under the Copyright Act 1968.
aharvey (2020-02-17 04:02:25+00:00): Hi @vakulya Given the license of the source you've used for this data isn't compatibale with OSM I've reverted the admin boundary in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81089443/.

Please next time don't import data from sources incompatible licenses and if in doubt feel free to reach out to the local AU community on the talk-au mailing list.

I'd also like to point out an import of admin boundaries is planned in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/PSMA_Admin_Boundaries
vakulya (2020-02-20 19:08:56+00:00): Hi aharvey, 
Thank you, vakulya
michalfabik (2020-02-06 14:15:29+00:00): Pozdrav Kristijane, ko je "mi"?
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-05-07 01:13:40+00:00): modified the object based on Maxar Premium Imagery
user_5359 (2020-02-06 13:45:57+00:00): Willlkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte: Die minimale Anzahl von Schlüssel für ein Adresse sind addr:street und addr:housenumber! Kannst Du bitte den Straßennamen nach pflegen?
mueschel (2020-02-09 10:03:12+00:00): Hi,
you added two recreations grounds on rooftops and used name spaced tags for this:
landuse:landcover
landuse:level
landuse:location
landuse:surface

There's a problem with that, because no software expects this and can't interpret it correctly. 
We could simply disentangle the two features and have two objects/areas on top of each other. There's nothing wrong with that (e.g. if there is a subway line under a road, you also use two objects and don't merge everything together)
Kovoschiz (2020-02-10 04:23:13+00:00): I'm not sure if a `landuse=`, or `landuse=recreation_ground` specifically is allowed to be put on a roof. I see its uses are either indoor or on top of terrain, which seem to suggest they are not entirely correct.
Kovoschiz (2020-02-10 04:24:45+00:00): (from an Overpass query on its combination with `location=` or `level=`)
Kovoschiz (2020-02-10 04:26:06+00:00): I could have added a `fixme=`
mueschel (2020-02-10 09:27:10+00:00): I think that most people just don't tag the 'location'. 'level' is only for indoor tagging, so it doesn't really apply here. It seems more common to say the building is underground and put a layer=-1 there (or a layer=1 on the landuse). I would decide this based on how the landuse connects to its surroundings.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 13:45:53+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Callme007 (2020-02-06 13:57:53+00:00): Tuinwijk*
s8evq (2020-02-06 21:50:18+00:00): Dag SamFCB. Je hebt een "landuse=grass" bovenop een bestaande gelegd (namelijk deze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651546092). Dit was niet nodig. Ik zal die van jou verwijderen. OK? Want die andere is meer precies (gaat rond de parkeerplaatsen).
s8evq (2020-02-06 21:51:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80661845
eggie (2020-02-06 14:40:42+00:00): Dag racingdriver96  ... Een doorgaande straat als deze zou je wellicht beter op highway=unclassified kunnen laten staan.
De voorgaande mapper is een zeer ervaren.
MVG,
Eggie
racingdriver96 (2020-02-06 19:21:45+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Excuses, wist ik niet. Staan deze richtlijnen ook ergens beschreven?
Voel je vrij om de wijzigingen terug te draaien, ik heb zo geen idee hoe.
eggie (2020-02-06 19:43:14+00:00): Hoi .. Er is niet altijd consensus over.
Sommigen willen alles in de bebouwde kom waar huizen zijn als residential taggen, maar dan loopt de routering stuk. Je krijgt dan willekeurige routes binnendoor.. vandaar dat de doorgaande routes een wegklasse hoger krijgen dan residential en ontsluitingswegen tertiary of zelfs secondary. Zie de Westdorplaan.
Maar het is "up to you!" als lokale mapper.
Oorspronkelijk bij de import van de wegen was de laagste klasse unclassified. (Importdonatie van AND 2007)  Residential kwam pas later.
De Jan van Arkelstraat zou je kunnen terugtaggen naar unclassified..
Succes,
eggie
eggie (2020-02-06 19:44:24+00:00): .. en kijk eens rond op het forum..
De Nederlandse wegentagging vind je hier.. 
Nederlandse wiki wegentagging
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging
racingdriver96 (2020-02-06 20:11:15+00:00): Zojuist de Hoven en de Jan van Arkelstraat terug getagd naar Unclassified. De link naar de wiki is erg nuttig, bedankt!
eggie (2020-02-06 20:33:46+00:00): Oke... Voordat je alles door hebt ben je vele tags verder. Laat je niet ontmoedigen door wat kritiek.
Gr eggie
user_5359 (2020-02-06 14:31:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
Refl_ex (2020-02-06 14:49:04+00:00): + rep
Ninjoh (2020-02-06 16:36:49+00:00): Zou u alstublieft een gesloopt pand dat nog wel in de BAG staat op OSM niet simpelweg willen verwijderen, maar in plaats van te verwijderen de (primaire) tag, building=yes te veranderen naar demolished:building=yes zoals omschreven op de wiki pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished:building.
Dit voorkomt dat een 'BAGgeraar' als ik perongeluk de panden opnieuw in OSM importeert, omdat wij anders niet zien dat iemand *bewust* deze panden heeft verwijderd.
Wanneer deze demolished:building=yes panden ook uit de BAG en recente luchtfoto's zijn verdwenen komt iemand ze wel een keer tegen om ze definitief op te ruimen.

Alvast bedankt,
Martijn
Objectinformatie Brw Twente (2020-02-06 16:41:32+00:00): Hoi Martijn,

Excuus, en dank voor de uitleg. Terugmelding bij de BAG heb ik reeds gedaan, gemeente heeft het ook al verwerkt en het zou morgen zichtbaar moeten zijn in de BAG. 

Gr. NIels
pantufla (2021-08-30 11:49:41+00:00): Hola Alberto, voy a quitar "Edificio" del nombre ya que no es correcto poner el tipo de elemento en el nombre
ftrebien (2020-02-07 01:01:04+00:00): Eduardo, o fato de haver trânsito (comportamento) não significa que este trânsito é permitido. Na esquina com a avenida Brasil há uma placa indicando que o trânsito é proibido. No OSM nós mapeamos as restrições legais, não os comportamentos.
FCCL-Vandœuvre (2020-06-22 08:42:40+00:00): Cette barrière se situe réellement au centre du carrefour ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2296198801
cyel (2020-06-22 11:27:12+00:00): Non en effet, elle était un peu décalée. La modification a été faite : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86977503#map=19/48.65673/6.16164
.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-10 17:51:36+00:00): Hello,

Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  I wonder if you could help?  People have noticed lots of new village and town ways added in Sweden in the last week or so.  Is that part of some kind of organised editing activity?  Would it be possible to provide us with more details?  

Also, you've said the change here is "temporary"?  Are you expecting to change it later?

If you have any other questions, just email data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
archie (2020-02-07 00:15:25+00:00): Why area=yes here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770377524?
Atakua (2020-02-06 18:31:56+00:00): Hi and welcome to the OpenStreetMap!
On your question about demolished buildings, here is a discussion on the subject with several options: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/21804/buildings-just-demolished-just-delete-them

Personally, in this situation I would add a node with "note=*" tag describing the discrepancy between current aerial imagery and the map. This way, there would be less change for someone to "restore" the building on the map. An example of such note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4230162425 

Thanks!
maraf24 (2020-02-08 09:35:39+00:00): Czy mógłbyś bardziej merytorycznie opisywać zestawy zmian?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Komentarze_zestawu_zmian
rskedgell (2020-02-07 15:25:55+00:00): For routing purposes, the cycleway is one way, which is why the footway (obviously not one way is mapped separately). You have also deleted give way nodes (TSRGD diagram 1003B) from the cycleway. Reverted.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-10 17:52:37+00:00): Hello,

Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  I wonder if you could help?  People have noticed lots of new village and town ways added in Sweden in the last week or so.  Is that part of some kind of organised editing activity?  Would it be possible to provide us with more details?  If you have any other questions, just email data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
abakus_uploader (2020-02-06 23:30:53+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2020-02-06 18:00:06+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Darf man fragen, warum Du die gesamte Adresse inklusive den Namen des Büros gelöscht hast, dafür aber eine falsche Schreibweise des Landes hinzufügst (wo keine Adresse muss auch kein addr:country stehen)?
MiriamLi (2020-02-06 20:38:25+00:00): Sorry, hab ich nicht mitbekommen. Bitte rückgängig machen.
user_5359 (2020-02-06 21:08:09+00:00): Done!
Mike Baggaley (2020-02-10 13:44:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to Open Street Map. Please note that to add a post box, you should use amenity=post_box rather than name=post box. You also need to show which side of the road it is on, rather than putting it in the middle of the road. Have fun mapping, Mike
SomeoneElse (2020-02-10 17:53:20+00:00): Hello,

Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  I wonder if you could help?  People have noticed lots of new village and town ways added in Sweden in the last week or so.  Is that part of some kind of organised editing activity?  Would it be possible to provide us with more details?  If you have any other questions, just email data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
osm915 (2020-03-03 10:40:24+00:00): Hallo! Der Tag vending=excrement_bags "erfordert" amenity=vending_machine und wird daher  idR nur in diesem Zusammenhang ausgewertet (siehe https://osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:vending=excrement%20bags).
Durch die Änderung hast du aus dem KTS einen "normalen" Mülleimer gemacht.
Wenn dort ein zusätzlicher "normaler" Mülleimer wäre (was nicht der Fall ist) gäbe es zwei Möglichkeiten:
a) am alten Knoten den Tag "bin=yes" ergänzen
b) neuen/zusätzlichen Knoten mit "amenity=waste_basket"

Ich werde das dann mal korrigieren, oder willst du das das selbst machen?
Du darfst mir auch gerne per E-Mail antworten.
Freundliche Grüße!
freebeer (2020-03-03 13:12:54+00:00): actually, i see two issues here:

   amenity waste_basket
combined with
    waste  dog_excrement
is one thing, as most robidogs and belloos and the like combine a bin together with a dispenser,
   amenity vending_machine
     fee   no
   vending excrement_bags

but they are independent functions.  near me are dispensers mounted on signposts with no associated bin in the area.

also, while strictly a rabidog is a combo unit intended for both, with a bin for collection of small canine packages, in actual practical use i saw as much regular rubbish being tossed in the bin with the dogpiles,  and the collection was the same into a general combined refuse truck also emptying regular bins, which of course may not be true everywhere that separate collection destinations are adhered to...
osm915 (2020-03-04 11:10:21+00:00): I am not sure I fully understand what you want to say, but guess we agree ;-)
Yes, vending and disposal can be independent, but at this location they are combined. I think it is unlikely that this bin will be used for other waste, as there are some "waste_basket" nearby. But just in case, one could of course add bin=yes to the node (and _not_ replace amenity "vending_machine" with "waste_basket").
Our mapping should only depend on the location and not on whether different types of waste might be mixed later on (e.g. during collection).
user_5359 (2020-02-06 18:48:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
user_5359 (2020-02-06 18:31:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you have any source about this church and the size of the building?
SomeoneElse (2020-02-10 17:49:00+00:00): Hello,

Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  I wonder if you could help?  People have noticed lots of new village and town ways added in Sweden in the last week or so.  Is that part of some kind of organised editing activity?  Would it be possible to provide us with more details?  

Also, you've said the change here is "temporary"?  Are you expecting to change it later?

If you have any other questions, just email data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-10 17:50:19+00:00): Hello,

Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  I wonder if you could help?  People have noticed lots of new village and town ways added in Sweden in the last week or so.  Is that part of some kind of organised editing activity?  Would it be possible to provide us with more details?  

Also, you've said the change here is "temporary"?  Are you expecting to change it later?

If you have any other questions, just email data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
AjBelnuovo (2020-02-21 00:10:51+00:00): Porquê você alterou a classificação de via residencial para via não classificada se ao longo da via há casas ?
Condado (2020-02-22 00:43:33+00:00): Hi AjBelnuovo. Elsewhere in the world, unclassified is sometimes used on main roads within towns or villages. That does not seem to be the case in Brazil so I will not change residential roads to unclassified.

Oi AjBelnuovo. Em outros lugares do mundo, não classificado às vezes é usado nas principais estradas das cidades ou vilas. Isso não parece ser o caso no Brasil, então não mudarei as estradas residenciais para não classificadas.
user_5359 (2020-02-06 18:47:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.
See https://www.osm.org/node/116593873, https://www.osm.org/node/2790882580
user_5359 (2020-02-06 18:10:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the combination of the booth tags denomination = new_apostolic, religion = Atheism.
SHARCRASH (2020-02-06 16:38:51+00:00): sorry, deleted tags only, no element
archie (2020-02-06 17:16:01+00:00): What's the meaning of putting https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225456806 onto forest-multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2723632? Doppelt gemoppelt?
With all respect, this seams to me no god editing. Fix https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2723632 first instead of putting forest/wood on top of forest.
hedd2 (2020-02-06 21:07:13+00:00): Can't tell what has happened here, but I'm almost sure that this area looked rather different before. Maybe my editor (ID) messed up displaying relation 2723632 completely when I started editing, happens every now and then with complex multipolygons.

Removed 225456806.
SomeoneElse (2020-02-10 17:55:48+00:00): Hello,

Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  I wonder if you could help?  People have noticed lots of new village and town ways added in Sweden in the last week or so.  Is that part of some kind of organised editing activity?  Would it be possible to provide us with more details?  If you have any other questions, just email data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
viloan (2020-02-06 16:50:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse (2020-02-10 17:56:29+00:00): Hello,

Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  I wonder if you could help?  People have noticed lots of new village and town ways added in Sweden in the last week or so.  Is that part of some kind of organised editing activity?  Would it be possible to provide us with more details?  If you have any other questions, just email data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
viloan (2020-02-06 17:09:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!