piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2020-01-17 11:54:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2020-01-17 16:53:49+00:00): Top!
DiogoBaptista98 (2020-01-25 04:25:04+00:00): Destruiu rotas de autocarro na sua edição. Pelo que tenha mais cuidado de modo a não remover o trabalho dos outros. Cumprimentos
Jose Luis Infante (2020-01-17 15:23:04+00:00): Hola,

no cal fer punts amb el nom del camping si és molt gran, al igual que no cal fer punts per tota Catalunya dient que que això és Catalunya.

Per això existeixen les relacions, i ja hi ha una pel camping, amb el seu nom: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8280839 .

Així que no calen aquests punts extres, però si es pot afegir més informació sobre el camping, com s'explica a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=camp site . Per exemple per indicar on és la recepció, els banys, dutxes, i equipaments varis. Aquest informació es pot visualitzar a https://opencampingmap.org .

Igualment no cal ficar el nom a elements genèrics, com "Piscina", ja que la classificació amb les etiquetes adients ja la defineixen. Si cal es fa servir l'etiqueta "description".

Salutacions!
Jose Luis Infante (2020-01-17 15:29:43+00:00): Ah, i esborrar els camins...
El mapa que es veu a OpenStreetMap és només una visualització de les dades que hi ha, al igual que https://opencampingmap.org agafa aquestes dades i les visualitza d'una altra manera.

Per exemple, aqui no hi surten els campings: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8280839/history#map=16/41.8319/3.0835&layers=T

És per això que editar per que es vegi o no un element no és correcte.
eggie (2020-01-17 16:41:15+00:00): Matthijs,
Welkom  bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Er zijn zo al wat taggingregels. ees je daarom goed in.
Gebouwen krijgen niet nog een keer het adres.
name=Huins 16 lijkt me niet correct.
Van het grasveld heb je een leisure=park gemaakt.
Evt. zou je het kaatsveld als leisure=pitch kunnen taggen. het is geen park.
Het schuurtje heb je name-=hed genoemd. een een adres gegeven. Dat hoort niet op een kaart.
De landuse=residential zit nu vastgeplakt aan een grasveld. 
Een dorpshuis kun je taggen als amenity=community_centre. Liefts op de adresnode die er vast is.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-17 16:48:22+00:00): Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79696921
Kijk nog eens goed.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-01-17 17:51:32+00:00): Dag Mathijs.. Ik heb wat aangepast en de adressen en namen van de gebouwen verwijderd. building=shed toegevoegd ipv name=
Het dorpshuis staat op de adresnode.
Het park dat geen park is heb ik verwijderd.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2020-01-17 13:46:28+00:00): Hello,
There are two courthouses here, which is a little odd, but neither of them are inside a building, which seems very odd indeed.
pangoSE (2020-01-17 15:48:07+00:00): Yes, They should be inside. The 2 courts are apparently different institutions but share a reception I think.
archie (2020-01-17 16:36:27+00:00): https://www.domstol.se/forvaltningsratten-i-harnosand/
pangoSE (2020-01-19 21:16:33+00:00): Thanks for the fix archie :)
Warin61 (2020-01-18 08:14:57+00:00): Relations deleted! These are wrong in that the outer ways spare segments.

The ways have been combined in to one way with the appropriate tags.
Vinber (2020-01-17 16:36:19+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions !
mapper999 (2020-01-19 09:27:27+00:00): Hallo Funki,
was soll denn der Key `information:kvv` bedeuten? Und ist diese "Information" im Betriebshof öffentlich oder nur VBK-intern zugänglich?
Funki76744 (2020-01-20 09:15:46+00:00): Der kvv braucht diese Info für die Darstellung in der eigen berechneten Karte. Ja, der Zugang dahin ist öffentlich.
mapper999 (2020-01-20 18:07:52+00:00): Schön, dass der KVV OSM nutzt, das Tag stört ja auch nicht. Ich würde aber das information=office wieder zusätzlich ergänzen, damit auch andere Karten etwas damit anfangen können.
Kann man die KVV-Karte eigentlich schon irgendwo öffentlich finden oder ist die nur für den internen Gebrauch?
whatmeinfallible (2020-02-04 00:17:11+00:00): Greetings,
When you modified way 764170972 and way 15525399, you disconnected these ways from way 184435160, producing a dead-end. Esri shows these roads as connected. What is the reason for this break in the road? Can you cite a resource for this edit?
Thank you.
mweper (2020-01-17 14:10:15+00:00): Hola @nramire1. Corregí el nombre de calle en los nodos de altura para que sea uniforme.
user_10241830 (2020-01-17 22:59:04+00:00): Hallo,

das Jahr 2010 ist heute genau 10 Jahre her. Nur so als Erinnerung ;)
surveyor54 (2020-01-18 21:04:44+00:00): Danke,
irgendwie habe ich hier ein Problem mit der Feinmotorik gehabt und mit dem Finger daneben gehauen. ;)
Warin61 (2020-01-18 08:04:28+00:00): Hi,
On building way 764178513 there is  a strange node that is causing a problem. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.10581&lat=-34.11949&zoom=10

If the node is deleted then I think things will be fine. 

PS the source description of 'aerial' could be may things .. pleas be more specific .. usually in this area i use the LPI Imagery.
evo_evz (2020-01-20 19:00:39+00:00): Hi
Thanks for you feedback. I deleted that odd node and it seems to be fine now. Just still getting my head around JOSM.

And thanks for the tip regarding the aerial imagery. Will use more detail in future.

If there are any other tips or mistakes you see from me then please don't hesitate to let me know.

Thanks.
Vinber (2020-01-18 10:25:22+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu,
un petit mot d'accueil : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Et si vous avez des questions, n'hésitez pas !
amitbish (2020-01-17 13:51:49+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this Changeset : 79700130  based on Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.

Regards,
amitbish
JulesGabrielVerne (2020-02-15 14:19:55+00:00): Skąd informacja że droga jest budowana? Przejeżdzałęm wczoraj od strony ul. Podbórzańskiej i nic tam się nie dzieje. Chasze rosną jak wcześniej
cyganka (2020-02-17 13:36:33+00:00): Droga jest budowana "jednocześnie" ze szkołą. Lepiej to widać od strony ul. Kredowej. Na działce przeznaczonej na drogę wycięto i wykarczowano drzewa pod budowę infrastruktury podziemnej. Minie jeszcze sporo czasu, zanim zobaczymy nawierzchnię jezdni. Pozdrawiam
iWowik (2020-01-25 11:47:40+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, к тому же нарушаете порядок наименования улиц (не пишете слово улица), а также пишете номера домов в тег названия и в тег населенного пункта пишете название муниципального образования.

Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их не просто найти.
рамазан0102 (2020-02-21 08:40:36+00:00): я родился и вырос в этом селе. плюс к этому есть возможность уточнять адресные данные у администрации
jcr83 (2020-01-19 20:53:26+00:00): Il aurait été utile de remplacer les addr:postcode=* par postal_code=*, comme suggéré dans ce message:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2020-January/096261.html
daop5510 (2020-01-20 06:21:23+00:00): En effet. Je réalise le revert du changeset.
EarlEBird (2020-02-11 17:07:52+00:00): Hello et2t, thank you for mapping. Is the trunk road with the P-217 ref traveling through Гудермес still valid?

EarlEBird
et2t7121 (2020-02-11 18:28:39+00:00): Действует. До полного открытия обхода Гудермеса. Ожидается в 2022 году.
EarlEBird (2020-02-11 21:37:09+00:00): Привет et2t, спасибо за информацию. Я ценю ваш быстрый ответ. Согласитесь ли вы с тем, что старое шоссе P-217 следует реклассифицировать в качестве "highway=primary”?
et2t7121 (2020-02-12 08:34:45+00:00): В waze мы понизили старое шоссе через Гудермес. Наверное и здесь тоже можно это сделать.
EarlEBird (2020-02-14 17:45:36+00:00): Похоже мы согласны с тем, что южный объезд лучше подходит для регионального проезда чем старый Р-217 через Гудермес. Это подтверждает новая позиция тегов/отношений «int_ref = E 50», а также новый дизайн, который похож на автомагистраль. Я понижу классификацию старого Р-217 до «highway=primary». Спасибо за помощь!
et2t7121 (2020-02-15 09:42:13+00:00): Отличная новость, спасибо.
PeterPan99 (2020-01-19 14:49:26+00:00): I visited this site (Russel Way) today.  IMHO the Eastern Half is still brownfield and not grass.  There is a sign up saying that the site has been acquired, so re-development looks likely.  The eastern half is a building whose purpose was hard to determine from the road.  Could be flats, but didn't look quite right.
PeterPan99 (2020-01-19 14:52:12+00:00): See:
https://campbellarchitects.co.uk/project/russell-way-crawley/ for details of flats "next to railway line", so on the South side of Russell Way.
dzidek23 (2020-01-19 21:24:58+00:00): Agreed, my updates were based on aerial imagery (solely). Corrected as per your suggestions, thank you.
PeterPan99 (2020-01-19 21:36:52+00:00): Correction:  im my first comment, I should have said "the Western half is a building".
Thanks for accepting my suggestions.  I will update accordingly.
freebeer (2020-01-23 10:01:36+00:00): please stop spamming the map with these ridiculous and badly-positioned nodes.  you are just creating more work for other volunteers to clean up after you, than you are adding anything useful and correct to the map.  the app or whatever you are using looks to be very badly designed and should not be used.
user_5359 (2020-01-17 18:28:23+00:00): Hello! Your point is in the middle of a building and you didn't set a name you us  a (wrong) description. 
Is inside the building a restaurant name "White House"? I am glad to add this information to the address.
freebeer (2020-01-20 06:31:30+00:00): no.  my lengthy reply got lost
StephaneP (2020-01-21 14:19:20+00:00): Bonjour elfronto,

Pour as-tu changé certains chemins de footway à path, puis ensuite de path à footway ?
Pour ce type de chemin "générique" autorisé autant aux piétons qu'aux cyclistes, path me paraissait très bien, non ?
exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76614446
A bientôt
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Jakka (2020-01-17 15:22:32+00:00): "Kikkerpoel" lijkt me eerder een mogelijke beschrijving van wat water=pond eigenlijk is zou die naam verwijderen....
JeremyKeusters (2020-01-17 15:26:49+00:00): Wordt hier in de buurt door iedereen 'De kikkerpoel' genoemd, vandaar dat ik dacht de benaming toe te voegen ;)
Jakka (2020-01-17 15:31:18+00:00): gebruik dan misschien loc_name
fntamap (2020-02-07 08:28:36+00:00): May I ask you the reason why, with this single (automated ?) changeset, you did deface about 400 names ? The way there were encoded (Chemin nᵒ 9, Sentier nᵒ 47, ...) was consistent with their appearance in the "Atlas des voiries vicinales", which is the source of all those names. It is also how they appear on most name signs installed by the local authorities (pictures available). And this is normal, since it is the correct French typography. In comparison, for a native French speaker, the "new" way looks rough and uneducated. So, please revert this changeset and restore the typographically correct names.
smootheFiets (2020-02-07 12:17:00+00:00): Let me explain: I happened upon this area in my Osmose feed after an unrelated edit.  It complained about two adjacent ways with similar but inconsistent names ("sentier 5" vs. "Sentier 5" if memory serves; at any rate it was about capitalization).  That struck me as an obvious enough mistake to fix remotely / mechanically (lower case is just wrong, isn't it?).  

I zoomed out a bit to check if there were similar problems in the area.  I found some.  Fixed them.  Zoomed out some more, found and fixed some more.  At some point, I must admit, I crossed the red line without noticing.  I got carried away.  Sorry, my bad!

I will, of course, restore the previous name tags.  It's gonna be somewhat tricky, since I fixed other things along the way (mostly erroneous near-junctions) and I'd rather not undo that.  Another lesson learned: keep changesets simple!  Please give me the weekend to sort things out.

Allow me to warn you, though, that you're not going to like the status quo ante, either.  Most name tags were / will be of the form "[sS]entier #number" (same thing for [cC]hemin).  Just a small number had  your preferred spelling with "nᵒ" (which I agree, in hindsight, looks more idiomatic; and I definitely believe that your view is backed up by the sources you mention).  But I'm happy to see that there's at least one local mapper who feels strongly about this.  I gladly leave this to your capable hands.  Please let me know if I can be of any help.  As fellow mappers, we want the same thing!
fntamap (2020-02-07 13:24:25+00:00): Thank you for your fast and courteous answer.
I happened to see those changes because I was about to perform some corrections after a walk in the region. It is my personal policy, in line with OSM recommendations, to only correct things I have personally seen (most of the time anyway 8-)). So my action in OSM is of the slow and steady style.
About the capitalizations and other defects: sure, there are quite lot, but I am working on them, like described above. In particular, in this very zone, a recent mapper has started to add all the 'Chemins' and 'Sentiers' present in the Atlas, without considering the situatioin in the field (aka 'Armchair mapping'). And he usually does add them without capitalization, too... So now, each time I go for a walk there, I have to look carefully at all those pathes to see if they exist or not, the bad capitalization/spelling beeing a strong hint.
Thank you for restoring the previous versions, good or less good. I have some work to do at other places where I have been walking recently, so don't feel too hard pressed.
smootheFiets (2020-02-07 15:00:53+00:00): Turned out easier than expected, so I just did it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2008585

5 edits conflicted with later edits (most by you).  I did not revert those, so the newer version is kept.

Bonne chance pour la suite, and thanks again for your watchful eye!
GerdP (2023-11-16 08:03:17+00:00): Moin!
Ich wollte gerade mal die Häuser in diesem Neubaugebiet https://www.osm.org/way/763415786 einzeichnen bzw. die age korrigieren, die unterdessen auf Bing zu sehen sind. Bin aber verwirrt, weil da an den von Dir bereits erfassten Adress-Knoten im südwestl. Teil immer   building=warehouse steht, wo ich nur normale Wohnhäuser sehe. Wahrscheinlich copy+paste Fehler?
user_5359 (2020-01-17 19:09:57+00:00): Hallo! Kleiner Hinweis zum Thema conditional: The tag heißt access:conditional, die Zeiträume werden geklammert und ohne Underscore geschrieben. Es werden auch englische Wochentagskürzel verwendet. Ich schreib mal die Korrektur nicht direkt in die Datenbank rein, da Du das Konstrukt öfter mal benutzt.
private @ (Mo-Fr 10:00-18:00); yes @ (Mo-Fr 18:00-10:00;Sa,Su)
Wäre übrigens zu überlegen, ob man nich statt zwei Bedingungen bei conditional nicht besser ein access=private und ein access:conditional = yes @ (Mo-Fr 18:00-10:00;Sa,Su) schreibt. Kürzer wäre es anders rum, aber hilft nicht wenn einer access:conditional nicht interpretiert
Andre68 (2020-01-18 10:10:52+00:00): This changeset creates a lot coastline errors. JOSM counted 228! As you used JOSM, didn't it warn you before upload?? Please fix ASAP! If it's not fixed tomorrow I'm forced to revert some of your changesets...
viloan (2020-01-17 14:46:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Yunkers (2020-01-18 00:11:47+00:00): Po pierwsze: Wypada poinformować autora o zrevertowaniu jego zmiany
Po drugie: Wycofanie mojej zmiany było błędne - nie rysujemy osobnych jezdni, gdy nie ma fizycznej bariery, w miejscach które poprawiłem jej nie ma. Już nie wspomnę o tym, że gdybyśmy chcieli dokładnie trzymać się zasad osm, to całe skrzyżowanie jest do kosza...
pio2_122 (2020-01-19 10:39:34+00:00): To uproszczenie polegało praktycznie na skomplikowaniu tego skrzyżowania, ponieważ dodałeś kilkanaście nowych (bardzo małych) fragmentów dróg.
Mogę zrozumieć uproszczenie skrzyżowania, jeśli zmniejszy się liczba fragmentów dróg, ale w tym przypadku tak nie było - więc dla mnie nie ma to sensu.
Yunkers (2020-01-19 17:23:25+00:00): To trzeba było pisać, połączyłbym te kilka podzielonych dróg wewnętrznych, a nie wycofywać cichaczem... Komunikacja przede wszystkim.
Yunkers (2020-01-19 17:45:32+00:00): Zwłaszcza, że liczba segmentów zasadniczo nie ma znaczenia, a iD lubi ciąć linie bez wiedzy edytującego...
eggie (2020-01-17 16:44:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Bedrijven worden op de adresnodes bijgetagd. Is de naam van het bedrijf werkelijk Kantoor? 
Verder svp geen adressen toevoegen aan gebouwen zelf. Er zijn al adresnodes.


MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-17 16:50:59+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79702996

Kijk nog eens goed. De makelaarderij kun je taggen op de adresnode 
office=estate_agent
name=....... 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Destate_agent

Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-01-17 17:42:36+00:00): De adresnode heb ik aangepast met bovenstaande tag + bedrijfsnaam en website.
Adres is van gebouw verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
pitscheplatsch (2020-01-21 08:35:25+00:00): partly self reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79739118
user_5359 (2020-01-17 15:43:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add also the business description (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtattoo)
User1 - Lightcyphers (2020-01-17 15:03:04+00:00): Fixed the issues (Crossing building/highway;Crossing building/waterway;Crossing highway/waterway)
abakus_uploader (2020-01-17 23:30:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Andrea Musuruane (2020-01-23 14:16:13+00:00): Ciao. Il sentiero che hai inserito non è collegato all'estremità inferiore. Non sembra inoltre ricalcare bene il percorso parzialmente visibile dalle ortofoto, che sembra più una track che un path. Inoltre, il tag name si usa per indicare l'odonimo. Quello inserito sembra più un nome usato in loco (usare loc_name in questo caso). Ciao, Andrea
user_5359 (2020-01-17 15:45:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
Marek-M (2023-08-29 10:11:32+00:00): Cześć, nie mapujemy każdego miejsca do tankowania paliwa na stacji jako amenity=fuel. Na stacji paliw powinien znajdować się tylko jeden węzeł lub budynek z tym tagiem i on powinien zawierać informację o paliwach dostępnych na całym obszarze stacji. Już poprawiłem tą stację Orlenu przy Miałkim Szlaku.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764200723
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298793391
user_5359 (2020-01-17 18:35:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Don't use name for description.
user_5359 (2020-01-17 18:55:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.

I have reverted your changeset.
dqn (2020-01-18 04:09:38+00:00): ありがとうございます！！
Hokkosha (2020-01-18 08:22:41+00:00): どういたしまして、これで無事直るといいのですが。
iWowik (2020-01-25 17:17:31+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, к тому же нарушаете порядок наименования улиц (слово улица пишется после прилагательного, то есть правильно Шоссейная улица), а также пишете номера домов в тег названия, что неверно. В название населенного пункта (addr:city) требуется писать только имя, без слов село и т.п.

Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их не просто найти.
azakh-world (2020-01-20 13:19:04+00:00): Hello.
Do you know if trains stop at Abbotsdale? The "abandoned" key was set pretty long ago, and the scheme at http://www.metrorail.co.za/index.html contains that halt.

Best regards,
Alexey
shavankrats (2020-01-20 17:17:43+00:00): not sure, but the map they regularly post on their twitter feed shows it being open:
https://twitter.com/CapeTownTrains
ToniE (2020-01-18 13:19:09+00:00): Servus Jonas,

ein kleiner Fehler hat sich hier wohl eingeschlichen:

Route-Master Relationen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5883422) enthalten ausschließlich Route-Relationen, keine Wege, Straße, Haltestellen.

Für ÖPNF-Relationen gibt es eine Qualitätssicherungsseite PTNA (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de) wor Fehler angezeigt werden. Für den INGV existiert dort auch eine Auswertung (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-INVG-Analysis.html)

Viele Grüße
Toni
xrefz (2020-01-18 13:47:41+00:00): Alles klar!
aceman444 (2020-07-04 21:40:55+00:00): Zdravim, aky je zdroj na tuto zmenu nazvu? Bing, ktory uvadzate, to zrejme nebude.
fukejs (2020-07-20 05:13:52+00:00): Zdravím. Je to už půl roku, ale skoro jistě byl zdroj ZBGIS a asi jsem to omylem nenapsal do zdrojů, to se omlouvám.
PT-53 (2020-01-19 08:06:44+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
dieses Gebäude (?) 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764213689
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Grüße
rainerU (2020-01-19 10:46:05+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ist erledigt.