piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MaGIStokrat (2022-07-01 17:06:26+00:00): Hm, Du argumentierst wie bei der Sperrung Altmarkt und denkst vmtl. nur an PKW.

Als Durchgangs-/Hauptstraße (tertiary) würde man, gerade als LKW-Fahrer (womögl. noch mit 'nem Anhänger) eine gut zu passierende (breiter ausgebaute) Straße ohne größere Hindernisse wie Bodenwellen, Engstellen etc., rechts-vor-links Situationen und Gefahr für Radfahrer/Fußgänger erwarten.

Überdenke mal unter diesem Aspekt, welche deiner geänderten Straßen, die ja nicht grundlos seit Jahren den Status so in OSM haben, bedenkenlos (sprich gefahrenminimiert) mit LKWs bevorzugt (als Abkürzung wie du meinst) befahren werden kann.

1) Gaglower Str. - Schon mit nem PKW riskiert man Achsbruch, wenn man mit > 10kmh die Bodenwelle passiert. Ein LKW mit Auflieger wird sich freuen, da abkürzen zu "dürfen".

2) Leipziger Str. vor dem KH - häufig wechselnd parkende Autos auf dem Seitenstreifen, Rettungsfahrzeuge, Bäume ragen rüber, Seitenstraßen zu den Ärztehäusern. Straße allgemein eng und 30er.

3) Eilenburger Str - wo ist das eine Hauptstr? An der abbiegenden Hauptstr. bis zur Ampel Dresdner Str muss man höllisch aufpassen. Zudem rel. kurze Stellfläche vor der Ampel Rtg. Osten

4) Sachsendorfer - ok, Zufahrt zum Bahnwerk, aber mehrere Bahnübergänge, eine marode Unterführung, Höhe Kleingärten gibts keinen vernünftigen Fußweg, Vorfahrt Tram in der Kurve.

5) Vetschauer/Leipziger - nach Schildern und Breite zwar denkbar.
Aber der eigentliche/offizielle (evtl ortsfremde) Durchgangsverkehr soll ja Thiem/Bahnhofstr/Külz oder KLiebknechtStr zw. Ströbitz/Spremberger Vorstadt nutzen. Angewöhnte Abkürzungen oder Schleichwege kennen Fremde nicht und würden die meist meiden, weil eben oft nicht der beste Weg für Durchgangsverkehr
MaGIStokrat (2022-07-02 17:13:32+00:00): Also nochmal, da Du lt. Profil ja erst 2 Monate mappst und dir daher möglicherweise die Erfahrung fehlt (du wurdest ja auch mehrfach bei deinen anderen Edits auf fehlende Quellen und eigenwillige Interpretationen hingeweisen):

Wenn Du aktuelle Belege/Fotos hast, die deine Sicht der seit 10 Jahren von erfahrenen Mappern als akzeptiert geltenden Klassifizierung deiner nun geänderten Straßen stützen können (hier insbes. Wegweiser o.ä., die ausdrücklich die Straßen als Verbindung zw. Stadtteilen erkennen lassen, so wie du behauptest), dann her damit.

Ebenso, inwiefern die lt. Wiki in den o.g. Links beschriebenen Situationen auf die geänderten Straßen plötzlich zutreffen sollen, was vorher noch nicht so war.
Fabian1429 (2022-07-02 19:40:36+00:00): Also soll ich diese Bearbeitungen wieder rückgängig machen?
dcapillae (2022-06-28 21:23:09+00:00): Este conjunto de cambios ha sido revertido.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 14:54:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123692417 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6119 .
Frans S (2022-06-30 10:14:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122974332
CubanBoi (2022-06-28 21:06:04+00:00): pls delete this i got confused with another town
Dimitar155 (2022-06-29 06:11:11+00:00): The tags were correct. There is a new section of cycleway that directs the north-west bicycle traffic from Slivnica Blvd. towards Dr. Petar Dertliev Blvd. This changeset has been reverted in changeset/122984366.
trigeo (2022-07-01 21:12:00+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. Is there a community resource or public works page I should be watching when editing in this area?
Dimitar155 (2022-07-02 15:36:32+00:00): Unfortunately the only resource you can use is people who have been there recently... There are no community resources nor public works page as far as I know.
Enrico Zini (2022-06-29 08:41:10+00:00): Ciao, e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!

Ho visto le modifiche che hai inviato. 
Se dovessi indovinare cosa sia successo, direi che tu abbia cercato di pulire la mappa da nodi senza senso.

I punti che hai tolto però erano i numeri civici delle case: ora li rimetto :)

Buona continuazione con OpenStreetMap!
Martin Borsje (2022-06-29 16:39:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Msiipola (2022-07-02 06:44:02+00:00): Hej! Här har du anget maxspeed="signals" vilket inte är ett godkänt värde.

Det i stället anges så här: maxspeed=(högsta fartgräns)
maxspeed:variable=yes

Enligt:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:variable

Jag ändrar det.
Allison P (2022-08-22 17:29:17+00:00): Please do not write "unknown" for names you do not know. You can leave the name blank or use fixme=*. Also, you should not classify random segments of roads as primary_link.
Allroads (2022-11-09 12:12:39+00:00): Hoi,

Traffic sign en access op een residential.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6340601#map=16/53.0362/7.0423

Toevallig bij een vergelijking kwam ik dit tegen. Zag opeens een polygon.



Groeten Allroads.
DTeelde (2022-11-09 17:31:20+00:00): Copy-Paste foutje. Meteen aangepast.
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:02:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-29 17:06:51+00:00): Hi poplitou,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
gscscnd (2022-06-29 05:19:48+00:00): ref jest używane na wielu drogach leśnych. Czy uważasz, że powinno zamiast tego tagu być stosowane loc_ref?
szalona_entropia (2022-06-29 07:24:10+00:00): Nie wiem, ale nie spotkałem jeszcze nigdzie indziej "ref" na drogach leśnych.
gscscnd (2022-06-29 18:39:44+00:00): Cóż, popatrzyłem w taginfo i jednak nie jest tego tak wiele. W okolicach Rybnika często numer drogi leśnej/pożarowej trafiał do name („DP 34 Magazyny”), ja raczej takie numery dodawałem do ref. Może powinny być dodawane do relacji, może nawet tylko do relacji…
ivanbranco (2022-07-04 17:08:50+00:00): Ciao Botaler,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/226904585

c'è un problema con questo benzinaio. Il codice univoco ref:mise è un duplicato di questo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/228116764
Botaler (2022-07-05 05:45:25+00:00): Ho integrato, con il gruppo di modifiche 123209663, i dati del nodo 228116764 le cui coordinate corrispondevano a quelle del database del Mise. Ho cancellato le chiavi del nodo 226904585 le cui coordinate non corrispondevano. Occorrerà un sopralluogo su quest'ultimo nodo per vedere cosa c'è ora.
mariotomo (2022-08-17 14:37:50+00:00): hola Alvarado2510. mira … usuarios Mapbox han informado a esa organización del nombre local de estas pequeñas comunidades. el texto recibido por ZhenyaBarashko autor de la primera corrección 122157381, que yo mismo borré en el conjunto de cambios 122161814, hay toda una discusión sobre cómo de acuerdo con Mapbox decidimos utilizar las claves name:es y name para estos lugares con importante población indígena, que por no estar en comarca no aparecen oficialmente con su nombre local. sin embargo la regla dentro de OSM es "ground truth" o sea la verdad es lo que se observa en el lugar, no necesariamente lo que informa el estado. Alto Tisingal es su nombre oficial en castellano, por eso estaría en el campo "name:es". al momento el estado sigue llamandole "Alto Tisingal", o sea no se trata de un "old_name". quizás, si acaso, un "official_name".
en la grafía local, no estaría mal validar se es Tzingal o Tsingal, con una "Z" o una "S". la Z es lo que dijeron los usuarios mapbox, la S es lo que pusiste. yo no tengo manera de pasar por ahí, y si tampoco fuiste tu personalmente, diría de confiar en la observación del usuario mapbox.

te aconsejo revisar lo que escribimos en los comentarios https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122157381, en que yo presento la versión oficial panameña en castellano y Zhenya me explica sus razones.
mariotomo (2022-08-17 14:39:08+00:00): The place name you have is wrong. "Trisingal" is an incorrect place name. Locally it is spelled Tzingal, though National Geographic spells it "Tisingal"

El nombre del lugar que tienes está mal. "Trisingal" es un nombre de lugar incorrecto. Localmente se escribe Tzingal, aunque National Geographic lo escribe "Tisingal".
mariotomo (2023-01-23 13:32:18+00:00): Localmente se escribe Tzingal, aunque National Geographic lo escribe "Tisingal".

sin embargo, Alvarado2510 lo escribe Tsingal. whatever.
literan (2022-06-29 17:25:32+00:00): area=yes лишний. Парк это всегда полигон, он не может быть линией
DeBigC (2022-06-28 23:05:31+00:00): JOSM is fussing over a suspicious tag combination at Sherrard Court. I think maybe that it is the speed limit applied   to an area. I can't think of anything else
PT-53 (2022-06-29 11:24:44+00:00): Hallo Sportyfrei,
dises Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267495134/history
soll ein Sportcentrum sein?
Welche Art von Sport wird in diesem Gebäude ausgeübt?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-07-12 12:23:09+00:00): Hallo Sportyfrei,
ich würde mich noch über eine Antwort freuen.
Wartende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-08-07 06:46:37+00:00): Hallo Sportyfrei,
ich würde mich immer noch über eine Antwort freuen.
Wartende Grüße
Bierphysik (2023-10-24 14:07:37+00:00): Hi. mE ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074353413 kein highway=path sondern highway=track. Wie kommst Du auf path? Der Weg ist locker auf highway=track Breite.
geognosist (2023-11-01 08:55:45+00:00): Hallo Bierphysik,
ja, Du hast völlig Recht. Das Tagging stammt nicht von mir, ich habe die Linie bloß an der Einmündung in den Rundeweg um den Reinheimer Teich geteilt, weil der Belag dort wechselt. Das mit dem Path ist mir dabei wohl durchgegangen. Hab's umgetaggt, danke für den Hinweis :-) 
VG
PT-53 (2022-06-29 11:26:33+00:00): Hallo Sportyfrei,
wo ist bei diesem Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267495135/history
der zugehörige Bauern
- farm_auxiliary=Ein Gebäude auf einem Bauernhof, ...
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-07-12 12:22:28+00:00): Hallo Sportyfrei, 
ich würde mich noch über eine Antwort freuen.
Wartende Grüße
jqngarcia (2022-06-30 05:54:30+00:00): Buenos Dias Nikolia, son Bus station o bus platform, no son las mismas etiquetas.

Puedes ampliar la información

Salud y Mapas, JQN
Yury Yatsynovich (2022-08-20 23:58:33+00:00): Please, don't add address to the "name" tag, rather use addr:street and addr:housenumber tags
jodd (2022-07-10 16:29:11+00:00): Hallo TWHB,
leider ist dein Änderungssatz sehr groß, sodass ich nicht alle deine Änderungen nachvollziehen kann. Zumindest hast du einige meiner Änderungen meines Änderungssatzes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120068358 überschrieben, obwohl diese den aktuellen Stand abgebildet haben. 
War dir aufgefallen, dass ich als Quelle "survey, track" angegeben hatte? Meine Beobachtungen waren aktueller als das Luftbild, dass du als Quelle angegeben hast.
Beispiel: Du hast den way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074359092 eingetragen (Straße im Bau), obwohl diese Straße schon fertiggestellt ist und zum Beispiel auch der Bus drauf fährt. Ich hatte die Straße bereits als fertiggestellt gemappt.
Ich bitte dich, deine Änderungen rückgängig zu machen.
VG jodd
TWHB (2022-07-10 17:27:55+00:00): Hello Jodd,
I have fixed the issue. Do u know if www.openstreetmap.org/way/335590880 or www.openstreetmap.org/way/981696611 carries the bus traffic? 
Kind regards, TWHB
jodd (2022-07-10 18:57:18+00:00): Hello TWHB,
thanks for the adaption. The bus X77 goes via www.openstreetmap.org/way/981696611. As far as I know, there is no bus traffic on www.openstreetmap.org/way/335590880.
Regards, jodd
jodd (2023-01-11 14:00:13+00:00): TWHB,
I've got another question: Do you know the actual access restrictions of the gates https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7544185420 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7544185421 ?
You removed access=private and bus=yes. So the access restriction ist unclear now. Many data consumers presume access=no if there is no access tag.
Kind regards, jodd
jodd (2023-02-11 11:17:22+00:00): Friendly reminder @TWHB
Glassman (2022-06-29 22:38:57+00:00): #TIP: if the entire building is a church, I'd merge the node and the building outline. Just select both, right click and use the + icon to merge the features
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122978510
Rakkka (2022-07-03 01:28:45+00:00): こんにちは。

交差点に右左折用のウェイを追加されていることについて、何度かコメントやメッセージをお送りしているのですが、届いていますでしょうか。

この編集についてTalk-jaのメーリングリストで相談したのですが、今のところあまり適切な編集ではないのではないかというご意見が来ています。
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2022-July/011210.html

複数ユーザーの間で今までに何度かウェイの追加→削除がくり返されており、今後も同じことを続けるのは労力が勿体ないです。
お互いが納得できる形に着地できるよう、右左折用のウェイを追加されることについて、意図などをご説明いただけませんでしょうか。
wham! (2023-05-03 19:49:01+00:00): do you have a source for the trail from Piette Meadow Rd to Passing the Buck Trail? I don't see it on the HART maps.
Hufkratzer (2022-06-29 20:02:35+00:00): Hi, I assume that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074363391 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074363460 are for the riding rings described here; https://homesteadhorsefarm.com/about-us . If this is true the tag leisure=horse_riding is inappropriate for them and they should be tagged with leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, compare wiki. There is also a preset for such riding rings in iD with name "Horseback Riding Arena". Why didn't you use that instead of preset "Horseback Riding Center"? Maybe the presets can be improved somehow.
Joseph R P (2022-06-30 01:55:49+00:00): I didn't pick the arena over the center since I assumed that the arena tags would be for large sports pitches surrounded by seats, but now that I look at it, the horseback riding center tags aren't any better since it appears they're for the entire facility. I've changed the tags.
charl3s (2022-07-02 07:24:32+00:00): Na przyszłość: nie łącz dróg z obszarami. Poza tym ok.
ElliottPlack (2022-07-05 16:01:21+00:00): Hey there, I am not sure if you're intending to do this or not, but please do not move any "boundary=protected_area" features, e.g., parks and nature reserves. The boundaries are precise and should not match any landuse (residential, woods, etc.). Just leave them where they are and draw anything landuse around them. I will fix these now.
ElliottPlack (2022-07-05 16:36:28+00:00): All set now. Check this out, I moved the residential area you'd made to the inner edges of the natural areas in the neighborhood. You can do this as best practice. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123242963#map=15/39.0762/-77.0316

Basically, you pretend the boundary=protected area is not there and then trace woods, meadows, wet areas, and residential areas around it without touching/snapping.
heretofore (2022-07-05 17:49:46+00:00): I haven't (intentional) moved any protected area boundaries since the time that we talked about. I have, however snapped landuse edges to them for residential/commercial/industrial. If the protected area abuts the zoning, it is demonstrably the edge of the area. I did stop snapping for natural features like wood/stream/etc. since those change independently of human zoning.
ElliottPlack (2022-07-06 14:38:15+00:00): I see. All good then. What I've been doing lately is snapping human landuse to the natural boundaries and then mapping neighborhoods "plat boundaries" to their legal locations. I tag the plat boundaries as administrative boundaries (level 10) and then run the residential area all the way along the inside of the trees, meadows, etc. Zoning is often not perfectly matched to parcel boundaries; due to the way they are mapped at a big picture level.

Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11719432#map=15/39.4643/-76.6740
AngocA (2022-08-01 23:09:46+00:00): Hola Facalderonm, este tipo de cambios es sobre muchos objetos, en una área muy amplia y borrando la historia de muchos objetos.
Para próximos cambios, reutilizar los objetos ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history). Recuerda que es un mapa comunitario.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-co/2022-July/004676.html
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-29 05:43:09+00:00): Hi, there's already a park mapped here and I'm not sure what "AP" is, so I've removed this node.
Becky Candy (2022-07-07 10:53:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping! Please, zoom in and out in order to clearly see if an object is a building or not. Look for a color difference between the roof and ground, shadows and regular geometric shapes (e.g. rectangles or circles).You can also use different imagery to compare for clarity.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122979292
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:06:10+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
mariotomo (2022-06-29 12:13:45+00:00): parece que estés quitando avisos, cierto? por favor revisa el concepto de "falso positivo": a veces un aviso hay que ignorarlo.
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 03:00:10+00:00): Buenas noches, el nombre es abreviado, la clave para ellos es Short_name, asi lo encontre en wiki, solo corregí la clave.
mariotomo (2023-01-23 13:10:56+00:00): le quitaste el 'name' y añadiste puntos en el nombre al mover el valor al campo 'short_name'. si entiendo la razón, fue para evitar el aviso osmose. 

por favor, estudia lo que dice Wikipedia a propósito de las pruebas (de calidad):
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falso_positivo_y_falso_negativo
ezekielf (2022-06-30 02:06:44+00:00): Hi dchiles,
I believe this change should be reverted. Although "Vermont Route 108" is the correct name for the full route, within the town of Cambridge there are two local road names used for addressing.  North of Jeffersonville the suffix "North" is added and south of Jeffersonville the suffix "South" is added.  The two addresses "2000 Vermont Route 108 North" and "2111 Vermont Route 108 South" are on opposite sides of town.
You can confirm this by looking at the VT E911 Viewer:
https://maps.vermont.gov/e911/Html5Viewer/?viewer=e911viewer
ezekielf (2022-07-08 03:16:05+00:00): Since I got no response, I've gone ahead and reverted the name back to "Vermont Route 108 South".  Feel free to reach out if you want to discuss.
mariotomo (2022-06-29 12:11:30+00:00): porqué eliminas lo que no entiendes?
Glassman (2022-06-29 22:45:56+00:00): There already is an existing coffee shop. I don't recall ever seeing two at Molbak's. Also, instead of drawing and area, just use a node. Can you review your edit and update as needed? Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122979742
calli3756 (2022-06-29 07:50:56+00:00): Danke!
ika-chan! (2022-06-30 19:42:28+00:00): Hello, why do you remove stops from train relations and delete public transport stop relations (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14007291/history)? They are an important part of the public transport system.
Thanosmed (2022-06-30 22:50:40+00:00): Hello. Have you carefully examined the kind of changes I have done, based on the real Greek railway system? In the specific case you are mentioning, I have changed the train halt / request to a train station, because this is what it is. Besides that, I have added way a lot more details regarding this railway corridor. As far as the Greek railway system is concerned, which I am pretty much aware of, the whole map of openstreetmap has a lot of mistakes and luck of information all over the country. This is what I am trying to fix with patience, so that we get an up-to-date map within time. If you have doubts or questions about the real conditions of the Greek railway system, there are a lot of sites to be informed from, including the site of the national railway carrier (https://ose.gr/ and https://www.trainose.gr/).
nikospag (2022-06-30 23:56:58+00:00): Δεν σου είπε να μην προσθέσεις λεπτομέρειες για το Σιδηριδρομικό δίκτυο της Ελλάδας!!!! Σου είπε να μην διαγράφεις τα relation των σαυθμών. Αν δεν γνωρίζεις το σύστημα που ακολουθούμε εδώ (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=625726) θα ήταν να κάνεις μια ερώτηση στο forum μας. (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75888)
nikospag (2022-06-30 23:58:38+00:00): *καλό θα ήταν
nikospag (2022-07-01 00:07:19+00:00): @Thanosmed
Επίσης όλη η κοινότητα είναι  θορυβημένη διότι δεν ακολουθείς τους κανόνες του OSM. Πχ με τις διαγραφές που έκανες δεν δουλεύει το routing των πεζών.
Thanosmed (2022-07-01 00:08:32+00:00): Καμία αντίρρηση. Τον γνωρίζω αυτόν τον κανόνα. Το tag "public_transport=stop_position" άλλαξε σε "public_transport=station". Βάζω αυτό το tag στους σταθμούς και το άλλο στις στάσεις. Το λάθος πού είναι; Πες μου μήπως εγώ δεν έχω καταλάβει κάτι σωστά και θα το διορθώσω όπου το έχω κάνει σε όλο το δίκτυο.
Thanosmed (2022-07-01 00:12:56+00:00): Δεν έχω πρόθεση να αναστατώσω όλη την κοινότητα. Απενανατίας να διορθώσω λάθη ήθελα. Πες μου συγκεκριμένα αν θέλεις πού προκάλεσα πρόβλημα και θα το διορθώσω αμέσως.
nikospag (2022-07-01 00:24:48+00:00): Αντε πάλι!!!!
Σου είπε οτι διέγραψες τα relation.
Γνωρίζεις τι είναι αυτά????
Απαντάς με άσχετες απαντήσεις.!!!
Thanosmed (2022-07-01 00:28:23+00:00): Καλώς. Βρήκα αυτό:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations

Θα προσπαθήσω να τα διορθώσω όλα με βάση αυτό το σύστημα και ελπίζω να λυθεί το πρόβλημα.
nikospag (2022-07-01 00:34:07+00:00): ΟΚ
ika-chan! (2022-07-01 00:47:23+00:00): I feel that some changesets may need to be reverted to recover the lost relations and station layouts. Afterwards, you can redo any changes while respecting the public transport v2 relation. I am currently tired and I don't know how to do it without making a mess with the merge conflicts and such. I am cautious not to do something that might make the problem worse.
Thanosmed (2022-07-01 00:53:23+00:00): Thank you for your comments and I am really sorry for the mess I may have caused. I think I found out what I should restore. In fact, I just saw this link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations, which you had mentioned in the public conversation about me. I am going to restore everything based on this pattern and I hope the issue will be solved. I'm sorry again. My intentions are not at all to disturb the community.
nikospag (2022-07-01 01:05:09+00:00): @Thanosmed
Αυτό που βρήκες δεν περιλαμβάνει τα relations.
Δείχνεις να μην γνωρίζεις τι είναι τα relations.
Τα πράγματα δεν είναι τόσο απλά
Gustavo22Soares (2022-09-09 01:37:02+00:00): Opa, Evania parece que você transformou a Lagoa da Messejana em um edifício heheh
as vezes acontece mas cuidado da próxima vez!
Bom Mapeamento! ;)
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:05:32+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122909928
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:31:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_5359 (2022-07-01 07:52:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/730227270. What is the meaning of the tags
building = construction site
highway = unclassified
?
Is this area a building or is the way a street?