piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gaspardedd (2016-03-18 15:31:52+00:00): Comment mettre une zone en gravier
please help me
streinger (2016-03-19 19:07:11+00:00): на участок Гребенской напротив 246 дома должен же быть проезд, сейчас в роутинге ошибка, т.к. дорога в воздухе висит(или её всю надо footway сделать), а участок где 309 дом там летом можно было не леушинскую проехать(там просто не чистят или столбики?).
Minofield (2016-04-06 06:00:47+00:00): Зимой там не было проезда. Машины проезжали по правой стороне. Там две дороги в переулке, одна для тех кто слева живет, другая для тех кто справа. Т.е. не как обычно, одна полоса на два сектора. Снег сошел, попаду туда еще раз, точно сделаю фотографию. Зимой такой вот казус был..
chillly (2016-03-18 15:57:06+00:00): Hi Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the detail.

Is the track you added called 'Hendre Farm Track' on a name board or the like. That sounds like an informal name, we tend to use formal names, usually from a name board in the name tag.
gj357 (2016-03-18 16:49:09+00:00): It doesn’t actually have a name to be honest - it used to lead to an old farm but that disappeared many years ago. It has in recent years been treated to some gravel by the local council, which has meant it is useable by bikes again - it had become quite overgrown prior to this.
chillly (2016-03-18 17:01:00+00:00): If it doesn't have a name then we don't add a name :-)  Is it a public footpath? If so we (in the UK) add a tag to show it of designation=public_footpath (or public_bridleway). Does it join to the road at the southern end?
gj357 (2016-03-18 17:37:28+00:00): Yes - it is a Public Bridleway rather than a Public Footpath and joins Llandeilo road at the northern end to Hendre Road at the Southern end.
Hjart (2016-03-18 21:03:09+00:00): Jeg undrer mig noget over alt det krudt der bliver brugt på at lave landuse=farmyard. Jeg ville mene der er mere værdi i at tegne bygninger på. Det er selvfølgeligt lidt mere besværligt, men alligevel...
Nakaner (2016-08-25 06:06:54+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41679413
Nakaner (2016-08-25 06:06:47+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41679413
Harry Wood (2016-03-24 14:34:12+00:00): I re-added MK Stadium with this edit after it was deleted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36718756
Hjart (2016-03-19 07:07:36+00:00): Please note that coastline should not overlap anywhere. I've fixed this for Kastellet/Knektaskärv which i have converted to 2 multipolygons, so that the problem is avoided.
runf (2016-03-19 07:49:12+00:00): Tack, var inte medveten om det.
chillly (2016-03-18 16:44:58+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the detail. 

Is the gym really a triangle-shaped building? The aerial imagery (which could be out of date) shows a bigger, rectangular building.

If you need any help, feel free to reply.
AMDmi3 (2016-03-28 19:41:39+00:00): Называйте, пожалуйста, улицы в соответствии с http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
muralito (2016-06-26 02:00:59+00:00): The aerial images in this area are several years old!!
Please do not "align" again.
5m4u9 (2016-03-19 04:40:40+00:00): gracias por edición...

recordar que toda calle urbana en las ciudades son de tipo residencial. Si en la imagen satelital se viera la superficie también anotarla.
chris66 (2016-08-24 20:01:07+00:00): Vermutlich unerlaubte Datenquelle.
Nakaner (2016-08-25 06:06:40+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41679413
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
chillly (2016-03-18 16:56:35+00:00): HI, Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the detail.

You have tagged a landuse area as residential. Is this a new development or is it a farmyard? If it is a farmyard as the (possibly out-of-date) aerial imagery shows it would be better to tag it as farmyard. The building looks a bit big. The aerial images are not always exactly from above, so buildings can look a bit laid on its side. You need to interpret it a bit. Is the area and the house called Crossway Farmhouse? The OS Opendata suggests Crossway Farm. We add names based on the name displayed on a name board where possible. 

If you have questions please feel free to ask by replying.
Nakaner (2016-08-25 06:06:33+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41679413
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Linie29 (2016-03-18 18:41:52+00:00): Seit wann ist die AB Sandoz wieder in Betrieb? Da müsste auch die gemappte Haltscheibe entfernt werden.
SWF8 (2016-03-21 10:34:35+00:00): Ein Triebfahrzeugführer hat mir das im aktuellen VzG gezeigt. Dort erkennt man, dass sie (Strecke 302 12) sogar mit ETCS ausgestattet ist. Daraus schließe ich, dass sie (wieder) in Betrieb ist.
Linie29 (2016-03-21 12:25:43+00:00): Dass die Strecke (oder eigentlich AB) mit ETCS ausgestattet ist ist ja logisch denn irgendwo muss ja die Transition stattfinden, eben dort beim Signal Xc04. Ich fahr dort im Laufe der Woche eh nochmal vorbei und werde Ausschau halten.

Und hast du die Streckengleise mit Unterinntalbahn mit railway:track_ref versehen? Das Attribut gilt nämlich nur für Gleise innerhalb eines Bahnhofes.
Linie29 (2016-05-08 08:59:49+00:00): Hab ganz darauf vergessen: Bin am 26. März dort vorbei gefahren und da war hat ein Teil der AB ab der Weiche bis zu dem Gebäude (also ca. ein Mastabstand) gefehlt. Ein Bekannter hat mir außerdem gesagt, dass dieser Zustand schon seit dem vergangenen Herbst besteht. Habe deshalb jetzt den Wert wieder auf disused gesetzt.
SWF8 (2016-05-10 11:59:54+00:00): Bin selber kürzlich dran vorbeigefahren und kann das bestätigen. Schätze, dass sie spätestens mit Inbetriebnahme der 2. Ausbaustufe der Unterinntalbahn wieder aktiviert wird.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Nakaner (2016-03-19 10:54:03+00:00): danke
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Nakaner (2016-08-25 06:06:25+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41679413
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
Nakaner (2016-08-25 06:06:18+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41679413
Nakaner (2016-08-25 06:06:08+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41679413
mtmail (2016-09-26 22:34:20+00:00): Does this island really exist or is it and the streets a mapping error?
Geonick (2016-09-29 18:23:50+00:00): No. This does not exist. Seems to be an exercise or a joke. I've deleted it.
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
5m4u9 (2016-03-19 04:48:51+00:00): Cual es el criterio para fijar a esas avenidas como terciaria y primaria? villarroel e incachaca?

por lo general en bolivia no existen caminos terciarios. Para darte un criterio:

* avenidas importantes con mucho tráfico "son primary"
* avenidas o calles transversales que unen avenidas importantes o carreteras importantes son secondary.

Así una buena clasificación, según esto y según lo que veo al ir a sacaba sería:

* primary = avenida chapare, avenida circunvalación y prolongación hasta chimboco, avenida sucre y prolongación, avenida X (del tunel de abra)

* secondary= avenida del cementerio, avenida de la plaza hacia el norte hasta chimboco, avenidas importantes transversales de la avenida villazón (urbanizaciones)

algún comentario?
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
visnjicliman (2016-03-18 18:02:18+00:00): Ja sebe u Tvoj projekata!!!
visnjicliman (2016-03-18 18:02:31+00:00): U kickstarteru
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:32:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
visnjicliman (2016-03-18 18:11:34+00:00): https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1425240588/1725714846/edit#the-basics
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
literan (2016-03-19 10:27:05+00:00): вы здесь салоны красоты задвоили. И вы уверены, что это именно салон красоты, а не парфюмерный магазин?
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
woodpeck_repair (2016-03-21 10:31:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37972026 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits made by an un-discussed bot, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/914
user_5359 (2016-03-19 11:13:06+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority.  Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree!
MarkusHD (2016-03-21 12:06:36+00:00): Korrektur: Fehler waren in changeset 37916101 (nicht 37218108)
Jo Cassel (2016-03-27 14:33:19+00:00): Ein Bot, dumm wie Bohnstroh
Nakaner (2016-03-27 16:16:16+00:00): Jo Cassel, kannst du das bitte genauer begründen? Eine frühere Version des Bots (ist schon ein paar Jahre her) hatte die Erlaubnis, in OSM zu editieren.
Jo Cassel (2016-03-27 19:53:42+00:00): Hallo Nakanar!
Hat der Bot auch damals schon versucht Hausnummern zu generieren, davon lese ich nämlich nichts in der Bot-Bearbeitungs-Beschreibung.
Ich geb ja zu, dass mir bewusst war, dass mein addr-Tagging von Straßenbäumen problematisch war, aber sinnvolle Alternativen konnte mir keiner nennen, s.:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Tag:natural%3Dtree#Standortangabe_bei_Stadt-B.C3.A4umen
Der Dummbot greift sich einfach die abschließende Zahl des addr:street-Strings und adelt sie zur Hausnummer.
Beispiel: aus der "Bundesstraße 83" wird dann ohne Sinn und Verstand die Hausnummer "83" extrahiert.
Und das macht der Bot ohne jede menschliche Hemmung dann auch hundertmal hintereinander.
Ich musste mir extra das reverter-plugin in JOSM installieren um den 254 Bot-Änderungen wieder Herr zu werden.
Das ganze Elend habe ich zum Anlass genommen über Ostern meine schon lange geplante Umstellung des Standort-Taggings durchzuführen, s.:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Jo_Cassel
Jetzt kann ich nur hoffen, nicht weiteren Bots zu begegnen.
Grüße zu Ostern
von Jo
Nakaner (2016-03-27 20:19:24+00:00): Danke für deine Beschreibung. Damit deine Argumentation nachvollziehbar wird, wäre es nett, wenn du auf die Objekte https://www.openstreetmap.org/(node|way|relation)/ID/history verlinken würdest.

Wenn der Bot solche Sachen macht, wäre ein Revert überlegenswert. (außerdem ist das nicht das, was ich bei dem Änderungssatzkommentar erwarten würde)
woodpeck (2016-03-27 20:31:12+00:00): Bitte ein Beispiel zeigen, an dem der Bot Unsinn gemacht hat, OHNE dass vorher bereits Unsinn herrschte.
woodpeck (2016-03-27 20:38:55+00:00): An xybot, bitte darauf achten, dass der Bot nur die Dinge macht, die auch im Wiki dokumentiert sind, und wenn Du das ausweiten willst, bitte vorher dokumentieren. Im Wiki sehe ich nichts von automatischer Hausnummer-Erkennung.
5m4u9 (2016-03-19 04:52:12+00:00): esta tu edición me hace pensar hasta dónde esta definido su "mancha urbana" de sacaba? 

sería bueno conocer para clasificar mejor sus vías, fuera de la mancha urbana las calles son unclassified y el resto son residential.
CloCkWeRX (2017-07-24 06:51:11+00:00): With a lot of these, I marked them as a delivery company office or similar
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-05-22 07:27:11+00:00): Cześć. Skąd wziąłeś przebieg tej granicy?:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420006897
Wg mnie właściwy przebieg tego odcinka wyglada tak: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420006898 
Mam nadzieję, że nie ma więcej takich niezgodności?
Rzezimierz (2016-05-22 19:11:40+00:00): Hej, a skąd Ty wziąłeś przebieg swojej linii? Ja dane wziąłem stąd - http://www.codgik.gov.pl/index.php/darmowe-dane/prg.html, być może wymagają zaktualizowania, tam gdzie widziałem mocne rozbieżności zostawiałem jak jest.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-05-22 19:26:56+00:00): Moja linia jest z podkładu EMUiA. Poza tym adresacja wskazuje na słuszność mojego źródła.
ViriatoLusitano (2016-03-18 20:58:26+00:00): Please don't do this.
ViriatoLusitano (2016-03-19 14:41:17+00:00): Your changesets have been reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37939760
utack (2016-04-16 21:15:56+00:00): Hi,
just fyi, "internet_access=wlan" is listed in the wiki, instead of "internet_access=wifi". That would help keeping a unified style around the planet.
Best
utack
user_5359 (2016-03-19 11:25:12+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. Is this a shop or company or ... ?
HabitatPWC (2016-03-21 21:21:20+00:00): The Habitat for Humanity ReStore is a store. Habitat for Humanity Prince William County's offices are also at this location.
Ciprian Vaida (2016-03-24 13:15:45+00:00): You omitted "Bassas da India" from "Îles Éparses" in TAAF/TF (OSM id: 6063099, v1)
Verdy_p (2016-03-24 13:28:08+00:00): Yes, but it was listed as part of "TAAF". It was forgotten from "Îles Éparses" only. I've fixed it.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-23 13:09:07+00:00): Hi Just for info, - Bing is offset here.  You've moved https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100530581 so it matches the Bing imagery, not the reality.  I'd suggest that you move it back.  You can use the underlying GPS traces (especially on narrow paths) to align the imagery.
chillly (2016-03-18 21:57:29+00:00): Hi Welcome to OSM.

I'm really sure what you were trying to add. We tend to map stuff that is verifiable on the ground. Is this are verifiable? 

You have only added an area tag, which is rarely needed. You need to add other tags to describe what you are drawing. If you need any help feel free to ask by replying.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-19 02:37:01+00:00): Just a thought - if you're trying to show something that (thankfully) isn't there any more then maybe you could use something like http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ ?  With that you should be able to draw something on the top of an OpenStreetMap map.  See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UMap .
mweper (2016-03-19 12:07:29+00:00): Hola serock. Viendo esta edición, me parece que tienes un error de conceptos. Por favor, lee esta documentación donde se explica que no se debe poner la categoría del PDI en el nombre.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names#Nombre_es_s.C3.B3lo_el_nombre

Por favor, revierte esto, ya que estaría mal y por favor AGREGA UN COMENTARIO DE LO QUE HACES EN TUS EDICIONES.
Saludos.-@mweper
pertile (2016-03-20 02:09:13+00:00): Ya lo revertí.
muralito (2016-03-20 05:15:11+00:00): Una observacion mas general, es que este tipo de cambios grandes (no por ser en un solo cambio, sino por la cantidad de nodos que afecta) conviene discutirlos primero entre todos.
serock (2016-03-21 12:00:28+00:00): Ok, no sabia, pido disculpa y gracias a pertile por revertir, y a muralito casi le pregunto si se podia hacer lo que hice, pero bueno... lección aprendida.
mweper (2016-03-19 12:07:37+00:00): Hola serock. Viendo esta edición, me parece que tienes un error de conceptos. Por favor, lee esta documentación donde se explica que no se debe poner la categoría del PDI en el nombre.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names#Nombre_es_s.C3.B3lo_el_nombre

Por favor, revierte esto, ya que estaría mal y por favor AGREGA UN COMENTARIO DE LO QUE HACES EN TUS EDICIONES.
Saludos.-@mweper
pertile (2016-03-20 02:08:58+00:00): Ya lo revertí.
rza31 (2016-04-04 12:46:39+00:00): Hallo zzschalke04,
für Glas- und Altkleidercontainer soll recycling_type=container verwendet werden.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4067510707
*Martin* (2016-12-14 18:06:57+00:00): Ahoj.

Odkial mas ten nazov "mexico city romska osada" a ze je to dedina?
Omegatherion (2016-03-20 06:50:04+00:00): Hallo, in diesem CS wurden diverse Namen von Bushaltestellen und Stromverteilern geändert, bei denen richtigerweise "Str." eingetragen war. Bitte ändere das.

Zudem wurden Nodes editiert, die so seit 2014 bestehen. Hat der Bot neue Regeln bekommen oder lief der seit Jahren nicht?
dieterdreist (2021-08-25 06:54:00+00:00): ebenfalls aktuell im Forum diskutiert: der Name “?” wurde kaputtrepariert.
dieterdreist (2021-08-25 06:55:03+00:00): Bezug: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73646
mweper (2016-03-19 12:07:17+00:00): Hola serock. Viendo esta edición, me parece que tienes un error de conceptos. Por favor, lee esta documentación donde se explica que no se debe poner la categoría del PDI en el nombre.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names#Nombre_es_s.C3.B3lo_el_nombre

Por favor, revierte esto, ya que estaría mal y por favor AGREGA UN COMENTARIO DE LO QUE HACES EN TUS EDICIONES.
Saludos.-@mweper
pertile (2016-03-20 02:07:31+00:00): Ya lo revertí
mweper (2016-03-19 12:07:12+00:00): Hola serock. Viendo esta edición, me parece que tienes un error de conceptos. Por favor, lee esta documentación donde se explica que no se debe poner la categoría del PDI en el nombre.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names#Nombre_es_s.C3.B3lo_el_nombre

Por favor, revierte esto, ya que estaría mal y por favor AGREGA UN COMENTARIO DE LO QUE HACES EN TUS EDICIONES.
Saludos.-@mweper
pertile (2016-03-20 02:07:19+00:00): Ya lo revertí.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-31 08:02:05+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4608433
Nakaner (2016-03-25 09:16:08+00:00): Bahnsteige werden AFAIK nicht von DB Netz, sondern von DB Station & Service betrieben. (von den AVG-Bahnsteigen an DB-Strecken abgesehen) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162579350/history
Gogul (2016-03-19 06:28:01+00:00): Hi! Why do you delete the bare_rock? For example here: http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/index.html?changeset=37929784&zoom=16&lat=46.51152&lon=13.90266&layers=BTT bare_rock look fine?! Br
coloredstone (2016-03-19 20:12:58+00:00): Deleted tags natural=moor and natural=bare_rock were created by RABA-KGZ import (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Slovenia_Landcover_Import_-_RABA-KGZ).

Early imports also include both tags which were later abandoed (see  discussion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2015-November/004152.html). 

It was decided that these elements should be deleted since there is no appropriate matching from the original source to the OSM tagging.
wambacher (2016-03-19 20:41:00+00:00): boundary=landarea is "dead". there is no reason for that. and it is not used any more.

for island in the see, the coastline is the admin-boundary for all admin_levels > 4

please revert your changes otherwise i have to talk to the dwg.

walter
wambacher (2016-03-19 20:42:26+00:00): and please: you should discuss changes on admin boundaries before you change them.
Verdy_p (2016-03-19 22:31:10+00:00): No: the islands that were present are in false "motus" and not really the islands.
They are not even the adminsitrative boundaries (that were not tagged at all before, because the only thing that was present was the international boundary of France and there was nothing about communes, communes associées and atolls in those communes).
All those changes are reflecting the official administrative status as reported by ISPF (the official statistics institute in French Polynesia)
I did not suppress anything, I added many more precisions, you make false assumptions
Verdy_p (2016-03-19 22:35:13+00:00): Note: boundaries for landareas are not dead, especially not in France.
There are still lot of work to do in French Polynesia, but nothing was removed.
In a later update I'll take into account the "baselines" for communes, but for now the islands are the not the administrative "boundaries".
I've just kept the tag "boundary=land_area" for compatibility, but I know it is not necessary as there's also "land_area=administrative" which is more exact, but present too.
Please don't assume things that you don't know about France.