piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-03-14 23:41:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DaveF (2019-07-12 19:29:27+00:00): Epsom Railway Station updates. Needs tweaking
nlehuby (2019-04-24 18:32:43+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi as-tu supprimé le tag highway=bus_stop sur les arrêts de bus de cette zone ? 
Ce tag reste nécessaire sur les arrêts et est encore utilisé par la plupart des outils qui utilisent les données transport d'OSM.
jseigneuret (2019-04-25 14:46:36+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est une correction fait suite au conflit entre les deux schémas de déclaration
Non il n'est pas utile.
Si l'on utilise public_transport on n'utilise plus highway=bus_stop mais un point sur le réseau linéaire public_transport=stop_position + bus=yes. Soit on utilise le schéma V1 soit on utilise le schéma V2. C'est pour cela que j'ai fait cette correction. J'ai pas corrigé les relations. Je viens de voir que tu as rajouté ces informations. Merci de les supprimer de créer les points nécessaires ou de ne pas utiliser public_transport. 

Il faut choisir un schéma déclaratif adapté.
nlehuby (2019-04-27 11:28:53+00:00): Bonjour,

il n'y pas de conflit entre les deux schémas, le tag public_transport vient préciser le tag highway=bus_stop qui peut avoir plusieurs interprétations. Je t'invite à relire la *proposal* du schéma PTv2 qui a été votée et acceptée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=625726
en particulier :
- "This proposal does not replace, deprecate or obsolete the already existing and well known tags"
- "The proposed tags can and do coexist with the well known tags."


Mais je comprends ton point de vue ... On a très régulièrement des débats sur la modélisation des transports, les modèles actuels sont soumis à interprétation, et le ptv2 reste faiblement adopté que ce soit dans les données ou dans les outils de contribution et de réutilisation. 
Je suis dailleurs tombée sur tes modifications en analysant les arrêts manquants sur la ligne Z (tes arrêts ne remontaient pas dans mes outils du fait de l'absence du tag highway=bus_stop).


Je pense qu'il est important de voir au delà de ces querelles et surtout de se conformer aux pratiques locales : en Île-de-France, la contribution sur les transports est active, de bonne qualité (voir http://junglebus.io/iledefrance/audit_2018_04/#Conclusion) et documentée (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_France/Transports_en_%C3%8Ele-de-France)
Les arrêts de bus sont cartographiés à l'emplacement où attendent les voyageurs, avec highway=bus_stop + public_transport = platform, c'est cela qui fait foi pour moi.


Si tu veux poursuivre le débat, je t'invite à poursuivre la conversation sur la liste de diffusion https://listes.openstreetmap.fr/wws/info/transport
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:56:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156592 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2593 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:56:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156592 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2593 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:56:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156592 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2593 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:56:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68156592 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2593 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-14 23:56:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 68156529, 68156533, 68156537, 68156538, 68156547, 68156549, 68156550, 68156554.
rpy (2019-05-10 08:55:06+00:00): This edit is incorrect - the segment is still a one way road westbound between Clarke Lane and Pacific Highway.
randh1 (2019-05-10 11:39:29+00:00): Thank you for the valuable feedback. I reverted the changes. Please feel free to point out similar mistakes in future
Regards,
randh1
elgolfo (2019-03-19 11:25:04+00:00): Hallo Berlin53,

bei den Adressen ist hier etwas durcheinander gekommen: die Nummern 8A-8G sind jetzt doppelt.

Kannst du das noch fixen?

Viele Grüße

Moritz
Berlin53 (2019-03-19 23:38:01+00:00): Sorry und Danke. Der Fehler ist korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
Berlin53
alzyee (2019-04-01 01:55:55+00:00): It looks like you added a lot of features to these golf courses but got off track somewhere. Roads, trees, most everything else you tagged are not water hazards. Please correct or remove these water hazards.
Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=19109129
viloan (2019-03-15 00:49:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-03-15 14:02:31+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded many objects with foreign tags. This looks like a mistake, could you check this?

ADMINISTRA=Forestry
ADMINIST_1=Forestry
CREATE_AUT=kcaputa
CREATE_DAT=2011/12/28
EDITOR_NOT=snapped to parcels
GIS_ACRES=48688.67803300000
MAP_RESTRI=0
MGMT_PROGR=FOR
PGRM_PROJE=SFT00033
PLANNING_A=0.00000000000
POINT_OF_C=Lake City 651-345-3216 & Rochester 507-206-2838
PUADMIN=41
SHAPE_Area=197036089.39599999785
SHAPE_Leng=1121849.11899000010
SPATIAL_UP=Bonnie J DeLare
SPATIAL__1=2018/12/20
UNIT_NAME=R J D Memorial Hardwood
UNIT_TYPE=State Forest
WEB_LINK1=http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/state_forests/sft00033/index.html
colour=#ff0000
hikebikeclimb (2019-03-16 10:32:00+00:00): i will fix this.
 the tags were imbeded  in the shape files i was using
BCNorwich (2019-03-15 07:28:05+00:00): Hi, I've removed the fiction you inadvertently uploaded.
Adamant1 (2019-04-20 10:40:19+00:00): Henry Cowell Redwoods State Park, a good example of your crappy tagging practices. It's a state park, which you know because it says so in the name, but you have it tagged as a national park instead of protected area + protection class5. Probably so you can keep the leisure=park tag on it.
stevea (2019-04-20 17:39:04+00:00): Nope, you assume wrong.  This is tagged boundary=national_park because it is a state park, and as states are sovereign in the USA.  This is a well-established practice on state parks (and other state lands), especially as they have "equivalent or better protection to national parks," as it has stated in our national_park wiki for years.  Please read it (listen).

Thank you for sharing your opinion, but there is nothing "crappy" about this edit.  You appear to not be able to offer constructive criticism, instead insulting, berating and assuming.  Perhaps you will learn "you catch more flies with honey than you do with vinegar."

There is no documentation anywhere that says your "instead of" premise is the correct way to tag it, in fact it would fly in the face of many years of documented tradition in OSM.  Do recall that boundary=protected_area is a relatively recent tag and its established use on state parks in the USA (or anywhere) is poorly established and a long way from wide consensus.  However, as I listen to you to make a case or argue for that stance, while instead you don't — you insult, berate and assume.

I frequently hike here, I've lovingly mapped this park (which is what EVERYBODY here calls it) for a decade and you are the only person who has ever said anything about is is "crappy."  Why is that?
AkuAnakTimur (2019-03-17 04:59:15+00:00): Hello.

Any chance you can provide the source of reference to make edits to this particular boundary?
se7entime (2019-03-17 06:05:51+00:00): jadi penasaran juga kenapa bisa lebih "kedalam" wilayah Malaysia (sebelumnya garis lurus tanpa patah2). Bisa memberikan referensi resmi/official tentang hal ini?

catatan: saya dari Indonesia
viloan (2019-03-15 02:57:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-03-15 03:27:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-04-13 14:26:50+00:00): pq deletou essas coisaS?
treestryder (2023-12-10 23:41:01+00:00): Is this really a dam?
https://openstreetbrowser.org/#paddling_hazards/w358563701/details&map=17/42.70048/-84.67064&basemap=osm-mapnik&categories=paddling_amenities,paddling_hazards,paddling_routes
If the water goes over. it is most likely a weir. But then, there is also a ford mapped there.
I drove over to see it for myself and found that I could not get very close.
treestryder (2023-12-11 00:47:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dweir
davenport651 (2023-12-12 18:59:07+00:00): @treestryder: It's on GM's private property so it's not accessible to the general public. I've looked over all the different views of this and it appears to be a concrete pad used to help utility vehicles ford the stream. I'm not attached to the "dam" label if you'd like to update it. This is likely just something I armchair'd while adding the local streams.
treestryder (2023-12-13 02:07:08+00:00): The highway segment is now concrete with a ford point at the creek. I figured that mapped the hazard and would render nicely. Someone with access to the site can improve it further.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145057922
davenport651 (2023-12-13 19:41:35+00:00): Excellent! I'm sure a lost delivery driver will appreciate our teamwork on this. :-3
treestryder (2023-12-13 19:47:15+00:00): At least now, they will not get sucked into a dam driving back there.
aseerel4c26 (2019-03-15 22:46:36+00:00): Hi gik1000, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Die Bar ist und war als "bar" eingetragen. Wenn sie bei snapchat nicht angezeigt wird, musst du dich dorthin wenden. Hier sieht alles passend aus. OpenStreetMap-Daten werden von vielen verschiedenen Diensten weiterverwendet, danke für deine Verbesserungen!
user_5359 (2019-03-16 17:54:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
DressyPear4 (2019-03-15 04:46:52+00:00): source:name-DSG
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mariotomo (2020-02-27 16:07:10+00:00): hola.  has añadido un 'stream' encima de otro 'stream'.  te lo voy a mejorar, pero tan raro que josm no te haya avisado.
mariotomo (2020-02-27 16:10:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81555222
user_5359 (2019-03-15 16:26:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your node. Please use lowercase key name.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-03-15 16:38:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вероятно, ошибка:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661332668  
  
Если лес leaf_cycle=semi_evergreen, то он не смешанный.  
Если лес смешанный (leaf_type=mixed), то он должен иметь, вероятно,  leaf_cycle=mixed.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:leaf_cycle  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:leaf_type
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
aharvey (2019-09-10 01:49:12+00:00): https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68161831/ in this changeset you've dropped the cycleway and surface attributes, I've fixed this up now, but try to watch out for this next time.
letihu (2020-03-08 12:10:52+00:00): Dieser 500 Meter lange Tunnel
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676962187/history#map=17/48.54584/10.31742&layers=N
der unter 7 Gebäuden und einem Friedhof hindurchführt, gibt es doch so sicher nicht. Wie sollte dieser denn instandgehalten werden?
TS-R (2020-03-08 17:18:29+00:00): Hallo letihu, 

ich bin zwar nicht ortkundig und kann zu diesem Sachverhalt in diesem Ort nichts konkretes beitragen, wollte jedoch anmerken, dass es auch in unserem Ort solch einen teilweise verrohrten Bach gibt.
Hier ist dieser größtenteils parallel zu existierenden Straßen eingezeichnet, so dass ich vermute zur Wartung gibt es Gullideckel über die das Rohr für Wartungsarbeiten zugänglich ist.

VG TS-R
Supaplex (2019-03-15 09:33:25+00:00): 一般道路英文的名稱不用縮寫
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68161977
user_5359 (2019-03-15 16:24:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your node. Please use lowercase key name.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:13:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
eggie (2019-03-15 07:29:03+00:00): Hi.. name:nl=   Kinderdijk Molinos is not the  official name for the village 
I will delete your contribution.

Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-03-15 08:08:00+00:00): reverted by changeset #68164240
mavl (2019-05-09 21:13:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-15 08:44:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68166245 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sock-puppet edits to Rochester, IL.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2595 for a block on the original user and related blocks.
eggie (2019-03-15 07:48:25+00:00): Het gebied van je edit is zo groot omdat je het pad aan de residential hebt vastgeplakt. 
Editor is een "ramp"in dat opzicht. Als het goed is is alles weer los.. 
Zodra je ziet dat een gebied zo groot is is er vaak geplakt. 
Stap over naar JOSM is mijn advies.
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-15 07:34:48+00:00): Dag kuppensoep.. Zo te zien eindigt je pad op de landuse of is er aan vastgeplakt per abuis. Editor iD plakt erg snel. Linker alttoets gebruiken voorkomt dit.
Dit was je edit   https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68163225
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-03-15 07:50:30+00:00): Het pad eindigt alleen op de landuse grass en niet op de weg. het zal niet routeren.
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-15 07:53:12+00:00): Meaneweipaed losgemaakt en verbonden met rijweg.
kuppenssoep (2019-03-15 23:45:13+00:00): Bedankt voor de hulp!
eggie (2019-03-15 07:42:26+00:00): Review... Elk begin is lastig. Je hebt de landuse=residential geplak aan de Rounwei. Dat is niet gewenst. |Op het moment dat iemand weer gaat schuiven komt alles mee en krijg je de meest vreemde effecten.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-15 07:45:34+00:00): Ik heb de hele residential in een keer losgemaakt van vlakken en wegen en een fractie verschoven zodat nodes niet op elkaar liggen.
Dit was je eigen edit.https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68163355
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-03-15 07:40:23+00:00): Review.. De footway naar de steiger loopt nog door het water. Meestal voeg ik bridge=yes  en layer 1 toe.
Het ligt een beetje aan de situatie. 
Wanneer je wegen gaat splitsen mag dat eigenlijk niet met editor iD, want er lopen hier OV routes. Vaak zijn die routerelaties dan beschadigd. Denk dat de routespecialisten dat wel in de gaten houden
Met editor JOSM kun je wel wegen bewerken met routerelaties.
Overweeg om over te stappen.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       


Gr Eggie
mavl (2019-07-21 14:15:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
abakus_uploader (2019-03-15 23:30:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2019-03-15 16:12:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your node. Please use lowercase key name.
ma-rt-in (2019-03-15 22:09:16+00:00): Hallo,
bitte die Werte shelter=yes am Bf. Altona wieder entfernen, da dies bereits durch covered=yes entsprechend markiert sind.
vg
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
maraf24 (2019-03-18 00:54:25+00:00): Jaki ma sens dodawanie landuse do budynku?
mavl (2019-05-09 21:11:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].