piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NaturAufnahmen (2022-04-10 10:51:39+00:00): F-Land ist ein kleiner (international nicht anerkannter) Staat. Gegründet 2016, Gebietserklärung 2019. Hauptstadt Fjørk. 
www.gov-fland.cf

Bilder:
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/J5FaPmJaXOitrGATNNN7NWFymjUd4mt9dx6vdZ-kfQBYxK8MRcVS5uQBiOCcDMadFoo0OqfzyUQFfwxBhf62cWn2arJzPWDDdPboUdNjvLt3ns-N3FagUnWCp2deVJgd6w=w1280

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/7FE9MwIGaLkzehNPcv8f32QBkRt4JYwyyhFOKkmen5vP7UICTYdjclbs8d1VUd8qDA6cDNYDTTmz5Eylw1qqVCEI-AKOpbSOoSCSK8QKBAiZPHlxSdIeE91K8Ds9M2-UFA=w1280

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/gbNmrkvmMDh74NrvLGxlXHmctd52DeInCsAnYoLuZQMdDFJtVUqtSxaVDTiXi8T35EwOox6qg9wsLnHSxb-Jm2dEXuZ23V_fpYxJEjPWPfcpYrPexdvzA2NVdq0G0yy1Pg=w1280

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/adr5sTWq5bhuWkDr8hjUllly74RNVTixNcXIKLRraGk4l7zaaplQ98JYotgIvil77u-YK8J5o-aEsCgFoV2Zf4xRuynlQCFMWBEojyzhuEOYO3_bZhnAp4iRyiFaYaaRXg=w1280

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/r171uOUkAQD7CB1OWbdQH1KiStHSWGyxk0jPAOArNlea-56gJbv6v8ARqxIuqKQzDRqrppH7xO1GH-XrZ-uM5dgrgd6YH-ybVUkIb8W6qUzPqb3dwSsl10yR_0tjNLdN1Q=w1280

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/H07RxWzorpJkIN5JeJ4qEdnoHAJQLdRdOz2KckpW_ULVRm5nMG7j4o0es4laVCXhrq2x0uxa4BSpSLlcT5Uhh3kT_doKmJa6pD4V8Pv79zyWUBe6ej3hGAaPusxABqVweg=w1280

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/OuFYe_B-dnzPDpk9BFAMoaG8CJtkmDyU9Y_Ez1r6pZKxTTRqPFuIbKk-8rMn4iU4E1E1tAVgbSPCW2dmJs7us-hem89QvW32Q4Zc-qfr6F21lvMrZDQnyyE0k9qAI6xhJQ=w1280

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/N8In5G_0y8fgsMf21LRz8R4cUInjfQFAIQT5XKcX85mygP7gvtuzcnft8KsCtLepHFN1gU82BFH2P2UIFoAvLQbcq79RS2FVh908fWbOCZTWW6nw_hM3pKcxBUSCImxq0g=w1280

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/tSyLdOddu4MOGcfDICVXzLELaJST0tarv5YX_DjblT0wEdVSj9VB9IwShPgfAlvNbSIuebCwgyZ_pSPJl8u7svb72E3Md2SqIcJNslxNZG1rvXVJSDRYcDFn3mXpVsbXKw=w1280

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/yOF6blgpW2rOT8YTOVNNcr04L-1G97VTFx_aCnWYqqW5H_KXCukOLGT7Pjlgrcmi0Y-y3uOsyPQqBxzWr6HKfaW2OmmUjcthPdxjec6bEUF1HEm3b9auPsif2DAzN2j4fA=w1280

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/KdlLAFXh4qAG5JHZRpstfQFvVW56MVPeR2nF7FvAw6WoZLNbF7ExlFBLvhsP00w9c5MFXkwLQIHuIO3Rp02WcFCJ1-WX_ZHruYdKgnOGQBSKmv7ukQ4jRHtQB6YY5jwgnw=w1280
streckenkundler (2022-04-10 11:40:22+00:00): 2/3 der Links funktionieren nicht... Der Rest: F-Land, wie Fake-Land... 
Lass den Hirngespinst aus OSM!
Supaplex (2022-04-11 02:10:14+00:00): 您好：

OpenStreetMap是群眾參與的共編地圖計劃，如果仍然是存在的事物，應當是修改現有的以符合比較精確的狀況，而非刪除用新的取代掉，也方便回饋過往的編輯歷史。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119513795
Mordechai23 (2022-04-09 20:32:51+00:00): ło panie, ale wielki ten landuse w Obornikach xd https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552600628#map=15/51.3033/16.9169
voltairovicz (2022-04-10 19:34:15+00:00): Wow, nawet nie spodziewałem się, że on jest na całe miasto. Kusisz, żeby go rozciąć hah
voltairovicz (2022-04-12 11:20:39+00:00): No i skusił, już jest kilka mniejszych
Mordechai23 (2022-04-12 20:03:32+00:00): <3
Eihel (2022-04-09 19:23:41+00:00): Hello Albin, Shouldn't we rather combine the "relation" (P402) [https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7062217#map=17/58.99651/16.20895 Katrineholms centralstation (7062217)] with [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11980424 Q11980424], because the item is a railway station (P31) and not just a building? On Wikidata, railway station is also rails, platforms, etc. Cordially.
(Lousonna on Twitch, Eihel on WD too)
Abbe98 (2022-04-10 07:03:59+00:00): Hello, I mixed up the QID of the railway station with the one about the building(Q30313596). Q11980424 should indeed be on the relation!
user_5359 (2022-04-10 07:15:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node over 100 meters, please check the position.

If youe need help, You are welcome!
user_5359 (2022-04-10 06:54:29+00:00): Hello! May I ask you for help? Can you please check the booth "Von-Werth-Straße". Booth are one ways but booth show in the same direction. Is this correct?
XtianCgn (2022-04-11 07:37:08+00:00): Hello,

yes, this is correct. Both are in the same direction.
user_2066394 (2022-04-10 17:57:22+00:00): Die Gewächshäuser im Roßfeldweg wurden abgerissen?
tomi0000 (2022-04-11 09:27:43+00:00): Die wurden zurückgebaut, ebenso das an der Bahnhofstraße, dort stehen jetzt 2 neue Hallen
eggie (2022-04-09 19:08:57+00:00): Hi Pprasath
You are asking for feedback..
In OSM Netherlands we tag at the BAG addressnode.. not at the buildingshape.
Even no addresses at buildingshapes.,
You will have a look again.
Enjoy mapping..
eggie
Pprasath (2022-04-09 19:10:34+00:00): Ohh ok
eggie (2022-04-09 19:37:42+00:00): I merged your info with the addressnode
Greetz,
eggie
Pprasath (2022-04-09 20:13:25+00:00): Amazing, thanks
PT-53 (2022-04-10 07:01:20+00:00): Hallo user567,
ist auf diesen Wegabschnitten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050604007/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050604008/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672316544/history
Radfahren ausdrücklich verboten?
Falls nicht, bitte Weg auf Path ändern.
Danke und Grüße
Mapperschwob (2022-04-10 08:22:49+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

ich war nicht vor Ort und weiß daher nicht, wie der Weg beschildert ist. Ich habe einen schon vorhandenen highway=footway anhand von Satelitenbildern verlängert.

Aus dem Changeset zum ursprünglichen Weg geht auch nicht hervor, dass dieser mit Ortskenntnisssen erstellt wurde (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67467282). Deshalb habe ich den Weg nun zu highway=path geändert.

Grüße
PT-53 (2022-04-10 09:51:47+00:00): Hallo user567, 
ich denke das paßt so.
Mapperin  N_SCHW ist mir für ihre schlampige arbeit bekannt.
Danke und Grüße
infeeeee (2025-05-29 13:11:58+00:00): Szia!

Ez a Svájci lépcső mint "lakatlan dűlő" mi akar lenni? A kereszteződés neve? Nem valamelyik lépcső neve? Ki van ez írva valahol? Mi a forrásod erre, műholdképeken nem látszódhat.
infeeeee (2025-05-29 13:12:30+00:00): Erre a pontra vonatkozik a kérdés: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9654653584
zsolt d (2025-05-30 09:45:57+00:00): Szia!
Persze hogy nem látszik műholdról. És nincs minden kiírva. De ott van, és ez a neve. 
430m magasan, túra pont a lépcső, illetve a kereszteződésnek és kis zöld területnek a Svájci lépcső alsó végénél:
https://www.bergfex.com/sommer/budapest/touren/wanderung/3180370,szepjuhaszne--janos-hegy--szechenyi-hegy--svajci-lepcs/


XII. kerületben nyilvántartott Svájci lépcső (ez a neve a lépcsőnek, amiben a Svájci út végződik):
https://12.kerulet.ittlakunk.hu/kozlekedes/121026/kovetkezo-hetek-lepcso-es-utfelujitasai
-
Javítottam a hely nevét lakatlan területről  kereszteződés névre a Svájci lépcső alsó végét.
krusefahrer (2022-04-10 16:16:02+00:00): Viele Gebäude wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/922253818 sind auch sehr rumpelig!
gscholz (2022-04-11 04:15:29+00:00): Hi kseltar,
this changeset has created an error in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.42250&lat=-25.29596&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119516260

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Muhmaker (2022-04-21 07:03:44+00:00): Hi. Bei deinen Umbauarbeiten hier am Bahnhof hat es auch die Relation des Haller Willem erwischt. Bist du erstmal fertig mit Edits an der Bahntrasse nach Osnabrück? Ich will das nämlich nicht mehrfach reparieren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119516725
DeFra85 (2022-04-21 15:57:10+00:00): Hej,
ich bin die Strecke nochmal überflogen und ich müsste mit den Bahnhöfen und Bahngelände jetzt durch sein.
Muhmaker (2022-04-21 19:48:26+00:00): Alles klar. Die Relationen sollten jetzt auch wieder in Ordnung sein. Eventuell sind die Haltepositionen in Quelle, Halle und Wellendorf nicht korrekt zugeordnet. Das ist aber schon lange so und hat nichts mit deinen Edits zu tun. Vielleicht täuscht mich auch meine Erinnerung. Ich werde mir das bei Gelegenheit nochmal vor Ort anschauen.
DeFra85 (2022-04-21 20:00:24+00:00): Die RB75 von Bielefeld nach Osnabrück hält in Quelle am Bahnsteig West vorm alten Bahnhofsgebäude, in Halle am Bahnsteig 2 (südlich, auf Seite des ZOB) und in Wellendorf am nördlichen Bahnsteig.

Die RB75 Bielefeld-Halle-Bielefeld, die morgens und nachmittags den Halbstundentakt bedient und in Halle wendet, hält dort jedoch an Gleis 1 vorm Bahnhofsgebäude.

Ich bin mehrmals wöchentlich in beide Richtungen mit der Bahn unterwegs.
Muhmaker (2022-04-22 06:37:34+00:00): Danke für die Infos. Die Haltepositionen waren dann doch nur in Halle falsch. Ist jetzt korrigiert und die Verstärkerfahrten Bielefeld-Halle-Bielefeld haben eigene Unterrelation in der RB75-Relation bekommen.
ottwiz (2022-04-09 22:04:27+00:00): *no, as I checked on the internet Wellsburg is the county seat. Nevertheless, Follansbee is still a town in OSM terms
archpdx (2022-04-09 20:45:55+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thanks for correcting this road name. Please note however that we don't abbreviate road names in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation). In this case the name should be expanded to 'Woodbine Place'.
GinaroZ (2022-04-27 11:03:17+00:00): Couldn't help but notice you had added a few bicycle_parking=anchors tags in various places. I saw one here - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=393846428407689 - normally tagged as "stands", is that what these anchors are?
FraserKp (2022-04-27 12:42:59+00:00): Morrison St I agree is stands, thanks for correcting that, but here the bike racks are shin-high only-good-to-lock-a-wheel-too affairs so think anchors is correct.
Supaplex (2022-04-11 02:10:04+00:00): 您好：

OpenStreetMap是群眾參與的共編地圖計劃，如果仍然是存在的事物，應當是修改現有的以符合比較精確的狀況，而非刪除用新的取代掉，也方便回饋過往的編輯歷史。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119517088
legofahrrad (2022-04-14 21:20:16+00:00): Hallo,
wie kommt denn
"traffic_sign=DE:254;"Zufahrt auf die Grundstücken frei"
zusammen mit "für Kfz gesperrt" zu Stande? Zeichen 254 ist das Verbot für den Radverkehr ;)
Sollte da vielleicht DE:260 stehen?
Beste Grüße
Hubert87 (2022-04-19 18:22:37+00:00): Ja, so wars gemeint.
Danke für die Korrektur.
Glassman (2022-04-10 19:32:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: Turn restrictions aren't needed to prevent wrong way turns onto oneway streets. They don't harm anything either.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119517153
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Luzandro (2023-08-22 18:01:45+00:00): Hallo,

ich finde die Unterscheidung, dass nur die nördlichen Teile über den Wienfluss Brücken sind, während die Abschnitte über die U4 dagegen Tunnel unter der Straße sind, etwas eigenartig. Historisch sind es wohl unterschiedliche Bauwerke, aber mMn. nur Verlängerungen der ursprünglichen Brücken
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:11:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:11:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
czebureks (2025-05-19 11:21:31+00:00): Hello!
I'm not an expert in Finnic languages, but are you sure this is the correct spelling of this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9654780953#map=19/59.839785/27.207416 ?
Greetings
Glassman (2022-04-09 22:20:39+00:00): Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119518356
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:11:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
DD1GJ (2022-04-09 22:54:00+00:00): Zur Information: Der Bayernatlas ist für OSM absolut tabu! Erlaubt ist nur das unscharfe aber lagegenaue Bayern bzw. Bavaria DOP80
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Supaplex (2022-04-11 02:09:57+00:00): 您好：

OpenStreetMap是群眾參與的共編地圖計劃，如果仍然是存在的事物，應當是修改現有的以符合比較精確的狀況，而非刪除用新的取代掉，也方便回饋過往的編輯歷史。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119518684
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-10 07:12:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3626082834 over 100 meters, please check the position.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.