piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2019-10-26 10:57:38+00:00): Добрый день. Пожалуйста, не надо удалять точки пешеходных переходов. Вы здесь не навели порядок, а скорее подпортили все. Читайте вики (там и картинка есть) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:crossing - а здесь я все исправлю (частично это будет откат, т.к. до вашего вмешательства часть переходов была нарисована корректно)
Nord Rider (2019-10-27 07:53:16+00:00): Спасибо за помощь! Надеюсь, вы и дальше продолжите внимательно следить за моими правками и корректировать их.
literan (2019-10-27 18:18:02+00:00): по мере сил стараюсь следить за всеми свежими правками в Москве, так что не обессудьте :-)
Bernhard Hiller (2020-06-16 16:56:35+00:00): Hi Russ, there is a long line east of hw  201 without any tags - seems to be some Potlach glitch when duplicating the way of 201. But I am not sure:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738769490
Russ McD (2020-06-16 17:33:45+00:00): Hi Bernhard,
Ah, yes ... looks like when adding the parallel highway, I inadvertently put another parallel line way out, and probably didn't see it. 
Thanks for letting me know, ... I have just deleted it.
Best, Russ.
DressyPear4 (2019-10-26 14:27:16+00:00): Tande, esses nomes são reais, locais (Há alguma indicação em placas?) ou vandalismo?
tande (2019-10-27 08:34:15+00:00): Bom dia Dressy
Meu MTB aqui é no meio de matas nativas ou reflorestamento nativas (eucaliptos) sou meio que desbravador por onde passo nomeio com um nome aleatorio, ai acabem fazendo parte do nosso mundo MTB, não há placas e combatemos o vadalismo e a preservação e limpeza do meio ambiente
DressyPear4 (2019-10-27 13:40:50+00:00): Ok, a dúvida seriam quanto aos nomes, se não há nenhum dado oficial, o correto é mudar de "name" para "loc_name"
mavl (2019-10-26 08:18:53+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 75602026.
Dimacn (2019-10-27 17:09:54+00:00): Можете объяснить, на каком основании вами были удалены существующие объекты? Ваши действия можно расценивать как вандализм.
mavl (2019-10-27 16:10:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76269778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3230].
user_5359 (2019-10-26 08:23:10+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kleiner Hinweis parking_space kennzeichnet einen einzeln Parkplatz, deshalb passt capacity nicht dazu (besser wäre der Wert parking). Deinen Kommentar zur Änderung "..für Bewohner mit Bewohnerparkausweis" ist nicht eingepflegt, ein access=private wäre sinnvoll.
user_5359 (2019-10-26 08:30:36+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! 

Ich habe mir mal erlaubt das Schwergewicht auf Schreibwarenhandel zu legen. Wenn auch Druckrei betrieben dann wäre auch ein craft=printer oder shop=copyshop (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop#Schreibwaren.2C_Geschenke.2C_B.C3.BCcher.2C_Zeitungen)
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2022-10-26 21:00:46+00:00): Hi,
Ist beim Weg 697981981 das bicycle=yes wirklich gerechtfertigt? Beim Bulldogwirt ist es ziemlich sicher ein Gehsteig. 
Schmal, Bordstein und Siedlungsgebiet sprechen dafür.
Was hat dich zur Änderung bewogen?
LG Robert
JM82 (2022-10-27 05:35:05+00:00): Hallo,
Nun, dass man auf diesem Weg mit dem Rad fahren kann/soll, hat der Erst-Ersteller (User: eriosw) definiert, nicht ich. (siehe Verlauf)
Nachdem es sich aber aus meiner Sicht (ich kenne ja seit vielen Jahre die lokale Situation) kein highway = path ist, sondern vielmehr ein Fußweg, auf welchem auch (gelegentlich) Radfahrer anzutreffen sind regelmäßig, habe ich es auf highway = footway geändert und das bicycle = yes angefügt, da doch der Charakter eines Fußwegs überwiegt.
Ich habe vor einiger Zeit bereits beim Nachfolgenden Fußweg den bicycle-Tag gelöscht, aber offenbar auf diesem Abschnitt nicht.
Als Siedlungsgebiet kann man das wohl kaum bezeichnen vor Ort, denn der Bulldogwirt plus die Quelle Johannisbrunn daneben sind gewerblich genutzte Gebäude. Ebenso die 4 Einfamilienhäuser gegenüber diesem Fußweg sind wohl in Summe kaum als Siedlung zu qualifizieren.
Genausowenig verfügt dieser Weg permanent über einen Bordstein, sondern nur auf einem sehr kurzem Abschnitt.

Schöne Grüße, JM82
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2022-10-27 20:01:35+00:00): Danke, jetzt passt es.
LG Robert
mavl (2019-10-26 09:06:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 75602674, 75604158.
Janjko (2020-10-02 13:27:37+00:00): Pozdrav,
U ovom changesetu si napravio most preko nove ceste D14:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387122886
Je li to pogreška? Jer u novim snimcima se ne vidi. Hvala!
eggie (2019-10-26 10:01:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-26 10:07:15+00:00): Dag Walter,
Vaak is het even zoeken naar de juiste adresnode (import Kadaster)  
Ik heb de info samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.
Gr eggie
walterdoodah (2019-10-26 13:42:49+00:00): Bedankt Eggie!
Dimacn (2019-10-27 17:05:46+00:00): В name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Пожалуйста исправьте - удалите описательные названия объектов.
ChehrehBargi (2019-12-04 09:40:28+00:00): با سلام
در نقشه فقط ایستگاه های رسمی و دارای تابلو علامت گذاری می شوند، نقطه ای که شما علامت زده اید محل نگه داشتن ماشین های شخصی و تاکسی های آزاد و غیر رسمی است.
Minh Nguyen (2019-10-26 08:56:41+00:00): Disregard the last part of the changeset comment.
SHARCRASH (2019-10-26 09:00:47+00:00): tag corrections*
mavl (2019-10-26 10:02:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 75607229, 75610340.
mavl (2019-12-15 16:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
JesseSweder (2019-10-26 09:26:02+00:00): Na navraag, zie changeset 76173260.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76173260
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-11-03 10:55:30+00:00): Is this an automated edit?

If not - can you make more edits, with smaller editing area?

Also, what exactly was fixed here?
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-11-03 17:23:40+00:00): reply to PM:

1) replying to changeset comments is best done as changeset comments - this way others can just read you rather than ask you to send the same message to multiple people

2)

I know that you edit using JOSM, my question is whatever you make an automatic edit.

You can make automated edit using JOSM, for example by
- search and replace without proper manual review of every single modified object (to avoid problems that are present for example in your edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60997284#map=6/23.753/75.200 with mass replace modifying unintended effects)
- importing data processed externally
- blind use of "Fix" validator button
- mass edit using plugins (lakewalker, wikipedia plugin and more are tools that can be used to make an automated edit)

and more

Are you reviewing every single modified object?
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-11-04 08:05:38+00:00): Reply to the next message:

search + replace, without verification of every object is an automatic edit.

It does not matter whatever it was made with a script, JOSM, level0, iD or other editor.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct 

"use of find-and-replace functionality using a standard editor such as JOSM or finding using services such as Overpass API and changing without reviewing cases individually;"
SomeoneElse (2019-11-04 09:24:07+00:00): @8XVHdmB2BC7kUQcY Please contact OSM's Data Working Group about your changes by email at data@osmfoundation.org .
SomeoneElse (2019-11-04 09:28:20+00:00): @8XVHDMB2BC7kUQcY OSM के डेटा वर्किंग ग्रुप से संपर्क करके data@osmfoundation.org  पर ईमेल द्वारा अपने परिवर्तनों के बारे में बताएं।
SomeoneElse (2019-11-04 09:31:38+00:00): @ 8XVHdmB2BC7kUQcY請發送電子郵件至data@osmfoundation.org與OSM數據工作組聯繫，以了解您的更改。
Branko Kokanovic (2019-11-16 15:55:29+00:00): imas ovde dve velike landuse=grass povrsine. Jel si siguran da to treba tako, sve preko te povrsine su zgrade, nesto ne znam jel treba da imamo "landuse=grass" ispod zgrada?
Gazer75 (2019-10-29 07:25:22+00:00): Kvifor var dette nødvendig? Du har laga meir rot på grensa en nødvendig og rota til relasjonar etter dette.
gormur (2019-10-29 14:37:15+00:00): Som nevnt; forberedelser.
Har ikke fått gjort meg ferdig her.
Bakgrunnen var å bli kvitt "hvite" linjer langs grensene. Det er også en mengde vann og våtområder som var kuttet direkte på grensen. Skoger slutter ikke på kommunegrenser... Skogsgrensene som fulgte kommunegrensene gjorde det også bare delvis.Dette changesettet var for å "løsrive" skogen fra grensen. Neste trinn er å forenkle skog-mp-en langs grensen og slå den sammen med nabo-skogen.
Gazer75 (2019-10-29 14:43:22+00:00): Du er klar over at det vil lage masse ekstra arbeid ved ein eventuell import av N50 i nabokommunane sant? Heile corine bitane burde vore sletta.
AndersAndersson (2019-10-26 10:47:38+00:00): Hej!
Enligt Ekonomiska kartan heter vattnet "Nedre föret". Jag saknar dock lokalkännedom. Har du mer information?
Daniel Björklund (2019-10-27 16:28:16+00:00): Hej!
Kommunen har satt upp en info.skylt vid bryggan som går ut i vattendraget, där det benäms Sunnerstaviken
AndersAndersson (2019-10-28 20:59:02+00:00): Det stämmer nog. Gissningsvis är det fel i Ekonomiska kartan då även vattensamlingen nordöst kallas för "Nedre Föret" i Ekonomiska kartan.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-26 10:57:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 63569510, 63569646, 63570111, 63624629, 63625043, 63625087, 63625404, 63625554, 63625742, 63625801, 63625818, 63626054, 63698650, 63701482, 63707348, 63712692, 63712766, 63712788, 63712875, 63848548, 63855854, 63855974, 63878614, 63878886, 63879263, 63879593, 63879996, 63880096, 63880301, 63880561, 63881097, 63881542, 63881714, 63925517, 63925725, 63925823, 63925905, 63928778, 63929001, 63929045, 63929133, 63939267, 63939347, 63939430, 63961668, 66438824, 66439221, 66439415, 66440111, 66440288, 66440545, 66441092, 66442032, 66442359, 66442406, 66480006, 66480066, 66480740, 66481385, 66517050, 66517957, 66519470, 66519617, 66519712, 66676190, 66754082, 66754147, 66845301, 66845441, 66845531, 66846112, 66846307, 66846784, 66847032, 66847332, 66886762, 66887765, 66887979, 66888173, 66888356, 66888538, 66888577, 68988191, 71578314, 71756088, 71838369, 72071323.
Markus366 (2019-11-04 15:29:20+00:00): Hallo,

verstehe zwar die Ähnlichkeit in der Gebäudeform, aber dieses Museum ist doch kein Silo ?!?!

Markus
Markus366 (2019-11-04 15:32:27+00:00): PS: Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du deinen Eintrag auf das bestehende Gebäude aufgesetzt hast. Falls das als 3D Gebäude gemappt werden soll, gibt es da glaube ich andere Lösungsmöglichkeiten, schau mal hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings

MfG Markus
telemaxx (2019-11-09 12:39:32+00:00): Hi Markus,
habe das wieder Gebäude gelöscht.

Umbau auf 3D wäre zu aufwendig, weil das Bestehende so ein Multipolygonteil ist.
Da müsste man das Teil komplett löschen und als Buildingparts neu machen.

MfG, Thomas
telemaxx (2019-11-09 12:40:28+00:00): edit: "habe das Gebäude wieder gelöscht"
Markus366 (2019-11-09 15:52:43+00:00): Alles klar, danke
Hjart (2019-10-26 11:13:34+00:00): Jeg har rullet denne ændring tilbage, så områderne igen repræsenteres af multipolygoner
Retired Account (2019-11-04 12:44:39+00:00): Hi,
This change introduced a fictitious mono-rail between Changi Airport terminals 2 and 4. Are you able to verify if this indeed exists?
Sanniu (2019-10-28 08:43:34+00:00): You added house-number without street name for house that already has number...
Please always mention street name in address and check for addresses marked as points, not a while building (for corner building with addresses on both streets it is essential)
EneaSuper (2019-10-27 08:22:18+00:00): Ciao Fabio71, ho revisionato il tuo changeset, ed ho notato che il tag "surface=terra_misto_roccia" è impostato in maniera errata. Dai un'occhiata a questa lista e vedi cosa ti sembra più idoneo:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:surface

Inoltre, credo che il nome del sentiero possa essere revisionato. Fammi sapere 🙂
Fabio71 (2019-10-28 08:17:51+00:00): Ciao, ho rivisto tra le diverse opzioni di "surface" direi che il termine "earth" per definire il tipo di terreno è il più appropriato tra quelli letti.
Per quanto riguarda il nome si potrebbe sostituire con "Raccordo Acquedotto Villa Durazzo Pallavicini".
Saluti.
P.S. Procedi tu alle modifiche?
EneaSuper (2019-10-28 13:46:49+00:00): Bene, quello che hai proposto mi sembra ottimo 🙂

Per quanto riguarda le modifiche falle tu, non ci sono problemi.
viloan (2019-10-26 11:16:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kartler175 (2019-10-28 08:48:10+00:00): Gemischte Rad- und Fußwege sollten mit highway=path …  eingetragen werden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
krilog (2019-10-28 09:26:25+00:00): Geändert. Danke
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
mueschel (2019-10-27 18:00:24+00:00): Hi,
I found several tags added by you like 
FIXREF, NEWREF, FIXCLASS or FIXMISSING.
These are all new and undocumented and do not show up in any of the QA tools.
Could you change them to the common 'fixme' tag - this makes it possible for every other mapper to find them and fix them if possible.

Thanks
Jan
datendelphin (2019-10-27 19:53:14+00:00): Hallo rstrauck. Ich weiss zwar nicht, was du mit Knoblauch meinst. Aber der Findling, den solltest du besser mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dstone natural=stone mappen.
Beste Grüsse und viel Spass beim mappen
Michael
user_5359 (2019-10-26 15:27:50+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte füge keine privaten Informationen von Mietern oder Eigentümer zu einem Objekt hinzu.
user_5359 (2019-10-26 15:35:09+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Eine Abbiegeverbots-Relation muss die drei Rolen from (ein Weg), to (ein Weg) und via (normalerweise ein Knoten, kann aber auch verschiedene Weg sein) besitzen. 
Bitte sieht Dir entsprechend die Relationen https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1433185 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/443900 an.
abrensch (2019-10-29 22:48:19+00:00): Hallo to_by_b,

herzlich willkommen bei Open-Street-Map !

ich bin bei routinemässigen Checks auf Deinen Änderungssatz gestossen, und da waren so "Verknotungen" in der Hauptstrasse und in in der Wiesenfläche.

Ich hab' Den Änderungssatz daher zurückgesetzt. Lass Dich davon aber nicht entmutigen und trage "Am Amtshof" einfach nochmal ein - aber möglichst ohne dabei die Hauptstrasse zu verknoten :-)

Gruss, Arndt
mavl (2019-10-27 16:10:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76269778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3230].
mavl (2019-10-26 13:00:58+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 75612034.
gileri (2019-10-26 16:03:32+00:00): Hello,

There is no need adding addr:city, addr:country, and on nodes part of an associatedStreet relation addr:street. All this data is already mapped as boundaries and used by most programs, such as Nominatim (the osm.org search engine), OSMAnd and Maps.me (most used mobile applications).

An example :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1883877946
Snusmumriken (2019-10-27 07:42:44+00:00): Ok, I understand, I won't be adding those those tags. Although I think that associatedStreet is an overly complicated way to add the addr:street info.
gileri (2019-10-27 12:15:49+00:00): I don't feel this way, but you're not alone regarding addr:street vs associatedStreet. I think the best compromise for you is to use the existing assicatedStreet if available or use addr:street if there is none.

I think it's better not to mix the two mapping scheme on a street.
Alecs01 (2019-10-26 15:34:29+00:00): Already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/662838605
Dave Venables (2019-10-26 12:24:49+00:00): More than a couple
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
sykul (2019-10-27 00:34:02+00:00): Hi. This is a great, detailed addition to OSM, so thanks. The only thing is, the name tag should only be used for the name of the thing. The address info should be put into other tags. I've just separated this name tag into different tags so you can see how I've done it. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6918239487

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
freebeer (2019-11-02 17:44:33+00:00): the name however should not be in ALL CAPS unless it is an acronym, but should be written in mixed case as `Siya Cuisine'
Velox (2019-10-29 12:30:34+00:00): Hi ndm. 

In process of reviewing your reverts of 76204147 and 76115879 about Kingsway Ave, I found out that there IS a blue one way sign. It is located North of the Gillard Road and Kingsway Ave, from this and to Two Mile Hill Road Kingsway Avenue is one way. 

Please, check the length of one way segment if I'm right, it should be longer.  

Link to exact sign location: https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=c9193494-9048-44b4-9920-863c5674bf45&cp=51.461758802222164~-2.5236010587254896&lvl=19&dir=0&pi=12.94129&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027&setMkt=en-US

Thank you.
ndm (2019-10-29 23:36:22+00:00): Thanks, but your link doesn't show a blue/white oneway sign.
Velox (2019-11-05 12:13:36+00:00): Yeah, Bing links are not very obvious. 

You can find this sign here: https://binged.it/33t6Sf3

As I can see on OSM, you already made this correct way, as it was in https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76115879/ you reverted previously.
Colin Smale (2019-10-26 12:48:49+00:00): Hi Robert, you should not have to tag level=0 as it is the default... Is there a specific problem you trying to fix?
user_5359 (2019-10-26 15:48:20+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!
Okay, dass ist das erstemal das eine Wildkamera (so) eingetragen wurde. Ich hätte sie ggf. bei man_made=monitoring_station (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station) oder bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance erwartet. 

Eventuell hilft Dir der Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4615745462 und der Eintragende eine entsprechende Eintragemöglichkeit zu finden.
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
JJIglesias (2019-10-26 16:22:31+00:00): No hay Cascadas en la Av.Blanco Galindo. Que es lo que quieres agregar?

Slds. JJ
user_5359 (2019-10-26 15:08:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the school please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
Glassman (2019-10-26 18:36:40+00:00): Why did you remove the old school boundaries? Does the new school use the same boundaries?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76242828
mavl (2019-10-26 13:46:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 75625395.
Parzelle13 (2020-08-11 16:17:44+00:00): Auch Nebenvorfluter sind keine Namen allenfalls Beschreibungen. Bitte Name in Description ändern und in Zukunft beachten.
Glassman (2019-10-26 18:34:51+00:00): that looks more like a playground than a park. If it is a playground can you fix the tags to leisure=playground?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76242877
viloan (2019-10-26 13:23:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-10-26 15:54:44+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Danke für den Eintrag vom Geschäft, ich frage mich nur warum Ihr sukessive das Gebäude, in dem das Geschäft existiert von der Karte gelöscht habt?
Your Village Maps (2020-02-02 00:56:11+00:00): I have been improving the mapping of Robert Street (mostly South) in Saint Paul (mainly to update ref back to MN 3) but couldn't help noticing that Shepard Road (CR 37) and Warner Road (CR 36) was changed from trunk to primary in your changeset. IMO the character of this road is definitely trunk, and it had been mapped as such for about 10 years (originally was secondary). I used to just go ahead and change things like this, but I've matured a lot in my mapping practices. Discuss?
TheRoadDudeMN (2020-02-02 13:48:58+00:00): I don’t know really. It kind of just seemed weird to have a motorway (35E), Primary (MN 5), and Shepard parallel to each other. You can change it if you want.


How about those primary/trunk stubs that are located by interchanges? (I-35E and Cayuga Street) What should we do about them?
Your Village Maps (2020-02-02 20:03:24+00:00): Thanks for responding. I'll study things a bit more and decide.

LOL - yeah I saw those too and wondered what was up with those...I'd be happy to change those.

BTW, in case you didn't hear, Robert St S is MN 3 once again (that's the main thing I was doing); I also re-added oldref = US 52 even though that seems like so long ago.