piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2021-06-18 14:25:16+00:00): Hello.
Please note that as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description that field MUST NEVER be used for promotional and advertising messaging.
As such, this edit was reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106579659
rbuffat (2021-06-21 15:28:56+00:00): Hallo lm@Door2Peak

Es scheint so als hättest du in den letzten Tag angefangen das Wanderwegnetz des Kanton Graubündens zu mappen. 

Du scheinst die GIS Daten des Kanton Graubündens zu benutzen. Bitte beachte die Lizenzinformationen dieses Datensatzes: "Für die kommerzielle Vermarktung des Datensatzes, beispielsweise für die Herstellung und den Verkauf von
Wanderwegkarten, ist eine Bewilligung der Fachstelle notwendig. Da die LV-Wege auf dem Strassennetz des
TLM basieren, ist eine entsprechende Lizenz der swisstopo vorausgesetzt" Seite 7 von [1]. Falls eine Bewilligung an OSM erteilt wurde, würde ich dich Bitten diese gerne im OSM Wiki unter [2] zu dokumentieren.

Ausserdem möchte ich dich Bitten, dir mittels hiking.waymarkedtrails.org anzuschauen, wie Wanderrouten in der Schweiz bisher gemappt wurden.

lg rene

[1] https://katalog.geo.gr.ch/gis-tools/gdds/tmp/amm4v2dbcbos3ibb2laki678o3/LV.pdf
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/HikingNetwork#Datasets
lm@Door2Peak (2021-06-21 18:26:54+00:00): Hoi René,
Danke für den Hinweis. Die Daten wurden uns vom Kanton für den Testballon des Projekt Door2Peak [1] zur Einarbeitung in OSM zur Verfügung gestellt. Ich werde schauen, dass die entsprechende Seite diesbezüglich noch vervollständigt wird.

Punkto  wie mappen... Es zeigt sich klar, dass das Wanderwegnetz in den Alpen (Wallis, Berner Oberland, Graubünden und Tessin) nicht kartieren lässt, wie es im Wiki vorgegeben wurde. Es gibt schlicht zu wenige benannte Wegweiser und damit einen Exzess an möglichen Verbindungen zwischen zwei benachbarten benannten Wegweisern. Der Standort Davos Dorf 1559 hat z.B. mindestens 35 "Nachbarn" und quasi unbegrenzt viele Routenkombinationen dazwischen. Ich habe darum die Diskussion mit Stefan Keller und Michael Spreng gesucht, damit wir eine für Alpengebiete praktikable Direktive erreichen können. m.E. führt kein Weg an einer Knoten zu Knoten Kartierung fürs Wanderwegnetz kombiniert mit einer Überlagerung von markierten (=benannte und/oder nummerierte) Routen ("Eichhörnliweg", "Prättigauer Höhenweg", "6 Via Alpina") vorbei. In diesem Sinne ist mein Kartierungsstil eine Vorwegnahme, den ich aber auf jeden Fall revidieren würde, sollte die Einigung in der OSM community anders ausfallen.
lg. Martin // lm@Door2Peak und landscapemapper

 [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Door2Peak
Jakka (2021-06-18 13:23:16+00:00): parking details verwijderd, er liep een GR 5 rood/wit markering wandelroute over de parking ? langswaar zou deze nu lopen ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2629186#map=17/50.94443/4.04161&layers=N
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106580710
pitfire (2021-06-18 10:40:34+00:00): Hallo hacmacuca,
ist Maxspeed so ausgeschildert. Ansonsten ist Maxspeed überflüssig.
In Deutschland sollte kein maxspeed gesetzt werden. Die offizielle Geschwindigkeit ist in der StVO mit Schrittgeschwindigkeit angegeben und alle numerischen Werte nur einer, sehr unterschiedlichen, Rechtsprechung entspringen.
hacmacuca (2021-06-18 10:52:18+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
Wenn die Klassifizierung als living street reicht, ist mir das recht. Muss ich dann meine Änderung wieder löschen?
pitfire (2021-06-18 11:37:53+00:00): Ja, maxspeed kann raus!
highway = living_street
Implizierte Tags:
vehicle=destination + bicycle=yes - Durchfahrtsverbot ausgenommen Radverkehr
maxspeed=walk - Schrittgeschwindigkeit
maraf24 (2021-06-27 20:51:38+00:00): Owszem, jest wąsko, ale zgodnie z oznakowaniem od jednej strony jest prawnie możliwy przejazd.
Ewen Hill (2021-10-18 03:25:08+00:00): Hi, most of these roads are private driveways and I have sent you a message requesting that these are set to highway=service, service=driveway, access=private. Can you please review and amend these please Snalla?
jam9264 (2021-06-19 09:46:22+00:00): Ce changeset (et en particulier la route en tunnel sous la montagne de Boudry) ne correspond à aucune réalité.
Contacté l'auteur le 19.06.2021.
A annuler.
Anton Khorev (2021-06-20 16:22:30+00:00): Hello suisse84.

Please don't add projected roads that don't yet exist as actual roads. Adding them would break routing on existing road network.
wermak (2021-06-22 00:31:08+00:00): Ein kleiner Hinweis. Kreisverkehre brauchen kein oneway=yes, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Droundabout.

Schöne Grüße
CloCkWeRX (2021-06-21 00:25:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955680242 is a driveway; not a public road.
Futur3r (2021-06-18 11:46:44+00:00): Salut,

oublie pas d'indiquer quels sont les matériaux recyclé avec un tag type recycling:*=yes/no ! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling

Merci pour ta contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106582303
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:57:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
abakus_uploader (2021-06-18 22:32:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Max-Kritic (2021-06-18 17:00:42+00:00): Cela ne sert à rien de mettre landuse=résidentiel sur le way outer d'un multipolygon résidentiel

Cela fait une erreur dans osmose : 
Polygone intérieur dupliqué
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#username=kritic&zoom=12&lat=50.6831&lon=2.556&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&issue_uuid=77e6c26d-ff70-0ea1-740b-b9b11a2c6ace
aceman444 (2022-12-18 11:15:36+00:00): Thanks
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
Vinber (2021-06-27 16:10:14+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Vous n'avez fait qu'écrire une description.

La piscine se trouve bien ici ?

Bonne carto
Vinber (2021-06-27 16:11:29+00:00): Oups sorry, it's ok, i misread ! >Thanks for website :)
pitfire (2021-06-18 11:51:38+00:00): Hallo hacmacuca,
kleiner Tip noch.:-)  Wenn du dich vor Ort gut auskennst, kannst du den Strassen noch eine Oberfläche verpassen. DE:Key:surface.
rocky2109 (2021-06-18 11:31:58+00:00): Used source Esri World Imagery
Yitzchak M (2023-10-13 07:50:55+00:00): Hi Tsur,
This is Yitzchak. I am having a discussion about bicycle=designated with Zeev, and I would like your input. The Wiki page for bicycle=designated assumes urban use of bicycle=designated, but does not consider non-urban (rural) use of bicycle=designated. In a forest, with no signs or markers present, you have labeled this path as bicycle=designated and NOT given it a relation. Why? Was it simply so that "bicycle path" would appear on the IHM map as opposed to a regular path? I am only asking so as to learn.
Tsur Halamish (2023-10-13 13:40:20+00:00): To answer, I need to know which of the 15 ways that are in this change, are you referring to.  Because some here are part of the Herzl trail relation, others are not marked designated.  But I just sampled a few.
Yitzchak M (2023-10-13 14:18:34+00:00): Hi Tsur. Thanks for getting back to me. Sorry about that. Here's the way in question:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/31.94384/34.96687
By the way, has the war affected you at all? I hope you and your family are alright. Like Zeev, instead of alcohol or narcotics, mapping is my "escapism".
Yitzchak M (2023-10-13 14:56:46+00:00): Sorry about that again. Try this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278305552/history#map=18/31.94404/34.96698
Tsur Halamish (2023-10-13 16:21:42+00:00): This specific singletrack was first edited over 9 years ago by valleyofdawn = Guy Shakhar. He added the tag bicycle=designated as you can see from the link you sent me.
I must have just adjusted its location slightly afterwards.
In any case I do not oppose this tag.   This singletrack was created by the community of cyclists and motorcycle riders.  Not KKL.  Its name is Gan Eden.  No one bothered creating a relation for it.
Have a look at all the area around this in IHM using the cyclin layer:
https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/map/15.75/31.9426/34.9647
You will see many more.
You will see lots of pirated singletrack
Yitzchak M (2023-10-13 16:41:24+00:00): This is in line with what Zeev wrote to me:
"That brings the next question: what would makes a non-urban segment qualify for a bicycle=designated tag.
Unfortunately, I don't have a good answer. Perhaps it is the de-facto usage by the bikers community?"
And that's the answer, as you just proved. Thank you for the clarification. :-)
pardthemonster (2021-07-08 00:00:36+00:00): Any reason why office=yes was added to all the houses in this residential area?
pardthemonster (2021-07-08 23:23:30+00:00): You could resolve by removing "office=yes" and instead changing "building=yes" to "building=house" to better describe the building type...or let me know if you need assistance resolving and I can take care of it.
blackboxlogic (2021-09-26 02:35:33+00:00): FYI golf editors were told that if they change all the houses to "offices" then they would render better in their golf game. So revert these sort of changes without hesitation.
rocky2109 (2021-06-18 11:54:53+00:00): Used source Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta
Svalbard (2021-06-19 09:06:32+00:00): Hallo 2dann, das, was Du beim Sperrwerk als roof einträgst, sind die Tore, die bei einer möglichen Sturmflut heruntergelassen werden. Siehe [1], auf den Bildern kann man die Konstruktion und deren Funktion gut erkennen. Kommt mir so ein bisschen vor wie Tagging für den Renderer. Gruß Svalbard

[1] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Störsperrwerk?uselang=de
Svalbard (2021-06-19 09:21:31+00:00): Weitere gute Ansichten: https://mein-wilster.de/Katalog/Verwandt/3811/Sturmflutsperrwerk+Stör
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:56:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
SafetyIng (2021-06-20 09:49:06+00:00): Hey, is the tag "service=driveway" unknown?
The insered way is a driveway...?
srderang (2021-06-22 06:03:11+00:00): Hi,
I have added Highway = service but not service= driveway as it was leading to several buildings and type of it is unknown. I have modified the tags as per your suggestion (changeset:106751585 ). Thanks for looking into my edit. Regards,
srderang.
manoj@123 (2021-06-18 12:27:37+00:00): Here, I used Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta.
ivanbranco (2021-07-08 16:20:28+00:00): Ciao Andrea, 

opening_hours=Lunedì - venerdì: 08:00-12:00 e 14:00-19:00; Sabato: 09:00-12:00 e 16:00-19:00; domenica: chiuso.

non è un valore valido, c'è un formato da seguire per inserire gli orari, puoi leggerlo sulla Wiki :)
BCNorwich (2021-06-19 08:19:58+00:00): Hi, You've placed your new bridleway Way: 955768236 mostly on top of service road Way: 472637519

The same for bridleway Way: 955768237 placed on top of existing mapped public bridleways.

Way: 955768236 is also placed on top of existing highways.

Theses duplications greatly disrupt routing. It might be best to revert this entire changeset and start again. Can you fix the problems or would you like me to?

Regards Bernard.
Tomhn (2021-06-21 07:55:22+00:00): Hi Bernard, many apologies for doing this. First timer! I'd assumed that the presence of a track / service road doesn't imply access rights, so would be helping to show them as a right of way / bridleway. I'll attempt to undo them. All the best, Tom
eggie (2021-06-18 14:49:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. In OSM taggen we alleen bij op de adresnode. Dus niet nogmaals op de gebouwomtrek.. Ook geen adressen toevoegen svp. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-06-18 15:00:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
Feedback:
Tip foot=designated hoort niet op een wandelpad. Dat speekt voor zich.
Maar het is weer actueler.  Ik heb het een heel klein beetje aangepast. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Seandebasti (2022-06-28 07:37:42+00:00): Hi thanks for contributing. What is this Site B: cultural Centre? on public satellite imagery there is nothing
eggie (2021-06-18 15:03:58+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. In OSM gebruiken we uitsluitend de adresnodes. Je hoeft dus ook geen adressen toe te voegen aan de gebouw omtrek.
Ik pas wat aan en dan moet je maar eens kijken.

MVG
eggie
*Martin* (2023-01-19 18:31:56+00:00): v tomto changesete ste spojili potok s el. vedenim. nebezpecna kombinacia ;-)
Jakka (2021-06-19 07:08:09+00:00): no need to add all these translations in the name tag. (are all the same ;)  )
    "name"="TopoGigo"
    "name:de"="TopoGigio"
    "name:en"="TopoGigio"
    "name:fr"="TopoGigio"
CloCkWeRX (2021-06-21 00:26:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955772782 Also a driveway, not an unclassified road
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-06-27 03:56:29+00:00): edição revertida, novamente, por favor, pare de fazer isso. suas edições estão incorretas.
adiatmad (2021-08-07 13:11:53+00:00): Hi, hope you are doing great. Thank you for mapping in Indonesia. I noticed you added "name=bldg" on the buildings (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1a6u). Do you mind telling me its meaning?
Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106590111
danbjoseph (2021-10-29 17:19:22+00:00): Hi Ria Grijaldo, it looks like are using the "name" attribute to track the number of buildings you edit. Please DO NOT do that. Proper use of the "name" attribute is described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

You can see your OSM contributions by typing in your username on https://hdyc.neis-one.org/
eggie (2021-06-18 14:55:19+00:00): alle dubbele info heb ik even  verwijderd van gebouwomtrek

MVG
eggie
Lee Carré (2021-06-18 17:14:11+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please.
user_2066394 (2021-06-18 20:11:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7397945112
Geht das hier nicht in Richtung *=turning_circle oder eben als Weg kartiert wie es eingetragen war?
Fredie (2021-06-23 06:45:35+00:00): das is n Privatgelände und gehört imo gar net eingetragen (Persönlichkeitsrecht). Aber wenn du meinst daß das von öffentlichem  Interesse ist wie der Bauer dort wendet, dann trage es wieder ein. Ich streite da net rum.
wolfgang8 (2021-07-15 12:44:52+00:00): Hallo ecod,
du hast einige grob gezeichnete Landuses gemappt - z.B. in Bad Ischl - die gerade im Österreichischen Forum diskutiert werden. Vielleicht möchtest du gerne daran teilnehmen:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=835136

LG Wolfgang
Futur3r (2021-06-18 14:54:09+00:00): Salut,

fait attention tu as utiliser un nœud d'adresse !

Ces nœuds sont dédié à l'adressage, il ne faut pas les modifier (uniquement pour mettre à jour l'adresse).

Pour rajouter ton POI, il fallait modifier le nœud qui tu avais déjà créé.

J'ai fait la correction, merci pour ta contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106590822
Inanix (2021-06-18 15:02:20+00:00): Bonjour, ça a beaucoup plus de sens en effet. Désolé nous débutons plus ou moins sur OSM. Merci pour ton aide, toujours cool d'avoir un soutiens.
Bonne journée à toi !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106590822
Futur3r (2021-06-18 14:36:36+00:00): Salut,

faites attention au croisement des chemins, vous avez superposé des chemins sans les relier par un nœud ! 

Merci pour votre contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106591333
amadvance (2021-06-21 20:28:51+00:00): Ciao Andrea,

Ho visto che hai cancellato molti foot=yes e bicycle=yes da sentieri. Io li avevo messi dopo aver percorso suddetti sentieri per segnalare che non è presente nessun cartello di divieto. 
Lo so che di default i sentieri sono già "yes", ma essendo un valore di default si perde l'informazione certa che il passaggio sia consentito. Specialmente per bicycle la cosa non è così scontata e di fatto si perde informazione che non c'è nessun cartello di divieto.

Io sarei intenzionato a fare il revert se sei daccordo.

Fammi sapere,
Amadvance
amadvance (2021-06-21 20:38:59+00:00): Come non detto. Ho visto che in realtà hai modificato quegli atttributi nelle "track" e non nei "path". La cosa mi va quindi bene.

Ciao,
Amadvance
Andrea Del Sarto (2021-06-22 10:16:49+00:00): Ciao amadvance,

come hai detto di default è "yes", nel caso ci sia l'informazione certa di non percorribilità è giusto inserire bicycle=no, in caso contrario è ridondante (anche JOSM lo considera ridondante)
qui trovi uno schema ripilogativo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Italy

saluti
buona mappatura
amadvance (2021-06-22 13:30:42+00:00): Non è ridondante perchè c'è differenza tra la certezza di avere diritto di passaggio dopo un sopralluogo e la supposizione che ci sia per una regola generale che però non garantisce da eccezioni (tipico caso sono i cartelli di divieto per bici messi dal comune).

Nota che questa informazione ha effetto nelle mappe. Ad esempio in opencyclemap un "bycicle=yes" esplicito cambia il colore della traccia.

Fintanto che fai queste modifiche alle "highway=track" mi va anche bene. Basta che non le fai ai "highway=path". In quel caso sarebbe meglio discuterne prima nella mailing list nazionale.

Ciao,
Andrea
Andrea Del Sarto (2021-06-23 11:24:44+00:00): grazie per la precisazione.
il senso della regola generale è proprio quello di dare un'indicazione, poi se ci sono casi particolare si inserisce il tag specifico, come nel caso da te citato dei cartelli di divieto. altro esempio su un autostrada non devo inserire il tag foot=no.
se le modifiche vanno bene per le track non vedo perchè non dovrebbero andar bene per i path

comunque detto ciò per il momento non farò altre modifiche di questo tipo, fintanto che non ci sia un chiarimento in mailing list nazionale.

saluti
Andrea
amadvance (2021-06-29 16:20:52+00:00): Ciao Andrea,

Solo per segnalarti che ho trovato un riferimento ufficiale che conferma la correttezza di avere bicycle=yes anche quando è già il valore predefinito.

Lo trovi all'inizio di questa pagina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions

In particolare quando dice:

"Note that explicit tagging of access repeating what following tables imply may be still useful. For example bare highway=path may mean either "surveyed and all defaults apply" or "mapped from LIDAR, not surveyed, may be private". In contrast highway=path + foot=yes + bicycle=yes is more clear what is its meaning. "

Ciao!
Andrea Del Sarto (2021-07-01 07:45:16+00:00): Ciao,

è il link che ti avevo già indicato nel mio commento sopra ;)
più che altro dice che non è sbagliato, nel senso che mettendo il tag highway=path valgono tutti gli elementi di default, per quanto riguarda l'Italia horse/bicycle/foot=yes e che aggiungerli può essere più chiaro, ma non obbligatorio aggiungerli, dato che sono impliciti.

per il resto grazie per il chiarimento

saluti Andrea
b-jazz (2021-07-09 20:23:14+00:00): Hi VLD178. I noticed there are overlapping buildings in this changeset that you might want to look into. Maybe there is a problem with your dataset that you are working with that should be addressed?
francians (2021-06-18 18:56:04+00:00): Com'è stata fatta questa modifica? Non mi convince molto... Che problema stai provando a risolvere?

Grazie
Francesco
canfe (2021-06-20 10:09:01+00:00): Ti ringrazio f_gonella per essere prontamente intervenuto in base alla mia segnalazione, ma tutte quelle strade agricole son chiuse con paline alla legge regionale 32/82 e s.m.i.?
francians (2021-06-21 17:21:11+00:00): Ciao

Se non ci sono ragioni di tenere queste modifiche, farò un revert più tardi..

Francesco
Stereo (2021-06-18 17:07:58+00:00): Hello! Wow, tu vois ça sur les photos de 2019? Avec les marqueurs?
foxandpotatoes (2021-06-18 18:24:36+00:00): Voir https://map.geoportail.lu/,  orthophoto de 2001. Les terrassements sont bien visibles. Je cherche le tracé du gazoduc Berneau - B
foxandpotatoes (2021-06-18 18:24:58+00:00): ... Bastogne - Bras. Mais je n'
foxandpotatoes (2021-06-18 18:26:11+00:00): ... zut ! ... je n'ai pas trouvé.

Reste à trouver Pommerloch vers Luxembourg !

Bien à toi.

Pierre P.
user_11418917 (2021-06-18 14:24:32+00:00): Thank you for your Amazing work, keep it up!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106591985
rainerU (2021-06-19 08:52:02+00:00): Bonjour,

vous avez fait des modifications concernant la Boucle des Lacs du projet Es Têt. Il y a des ajouts utiles sur les chemins qui composent ce circuit, par exemple la vitesse maximale, les droits d'accès etc. Par contre, assigner un nom "ES TET..." aux chemins n'est pas conforme avec les règles d'Openstreetmap, notamment là où le circuit passe par des rues qui ont déjà un nom. Ainsi, la rue du Lac et la rue des Corbières ont perdu leur nom. Je vous prie de réparer cette erreur.

De façon générale, il n'est pas d'usage de mettre le nom d'un circuit touristique sur les chemins mais de créer une relation qui regroupe ces chemins et de mettre le nom sur la relation. C'est ce que j'ai fait pour le tracé en projet au nord de la rivière : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9661753 Vous trouverez d'autres exemples dans le département : la voie verte de l'Agly, la véloroute en Pays Pyrénées Méditerranée,...

Si vous avez des difficultés à créer une relation dans OSM je suis disponible pour vous donner un coup de main.

Merci pour vos contributions

rainerU
rainerU (2021-06-22 10:24:10+00:00): J'ai fait les modifications necessaires + ajout des chemins de la Boucle jusqu'au Lac du Moulin. A voir sur https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=15!42.6792!2.7684
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106592013
MartineN66 (2021-06-25 16:29:44+00:00): Merci RainerU. C'était effectivement ma première contribution. Suite à un événement organisé sur les 2 lacs, il m'a été indiqué que le lac des bosigues était difficile à trouver. J'ai donc tenté une contribution. Merci  pour votre aide.
literan (2021-06-18 15:54:04+00:00): а зачем надо было удалять дорогу, которая будет построена по проекту? там пока времянку сделали.

Верну, т.к. обоснования удаления в правке не было