piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Constable (2020-04-22 20:56:24+00:00): Ciao, benvenuta su OSM.
Guardando questo tuo gruppo di modifiche noto alcune cose che non vanno. I dettagli della tua modifica sono qua: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=83959560

Hai:
rinominato due ristoranti aggiungendo "(con giardino)", rimosso una fontana e una panchina a Bereguardo, rinominato la ciclabile alzaia del Naviglio aggiungendo "Ciclabile per Milano" e forse qualche altra modifica.
A parte panchina e fontana rimosse (perché?), le altre sono modifiche che sembrano voler aggiungere dei dettagli alla mappa, ma non sono fatte nel modo corretto.
Il nome del ristorante è "La Gallina Fumante", non "La Gallina Fumante (con giardino)", sarebbe come rinominare il colosseo e chiamarlo "Colosseo (di pietra)", oppure "Stadio Giuseppe Meazza" e chiamarlo "Stadio Giuseppe Meazza (di Inter e Milan)".
Al momento, che io sappia, per i ristoranti puoi segnalare se hanno posti a sedere all'aperto attraverso l'etichetta "outdoor_seating=yes" , modificare il nome aggiungendo un elemento descrittivo non è corretto, per segnalare una caratteristica di un oggetto serve trovare l'etichetta adatta.
Qua una lista di quelle più comuni per i ristoranti https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant

Suppongo inoltre che tu abbia trascinato accidentalmente un punto di una strada https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/430897068 , creando una curva a gomito inesistente.

Questa ciclabile https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794932978 inoltre, non è corretta inserita a quel modo, risulta sovrapposta ad una strada già esistente (se così fosse dovrebbe essere una strada a due piani (ammesso esista). Se il tratto che collega i due paesi è una ciclabile, con tutte le restrizioni del caso ed identificata da apposita segnaletica stradale, la strada in mappa va convertita in ciclabile, nel caso in cui invece la strada sia una normale strada che collega due paesi è giusto resti com'è, in quanto l'essere strada implica anche la possibilità di essere percorsa dalle bici, ammesso che non vengano aggiunte restrizioni (bicycle=no). Il tag width invece indica la larghezza della strada, il tuo 700 signfica che la strada è larga 700 metri...
I nodi etichettati come "note=dangerous crossing" non sono concettualmente sbagliati, però lasciano il tempo che trovano, perché probabilmente nessun servizio di navigazione che usa i dati Openstreetmap è in grado di interpretarli, quindi nessuno mai avrà beneficio dalla loro presenza in mappa.

Provvedo ad annullare la tua modifica perché di fatto introduce delle imperfezioni. Nel frattempo ti direi di dare un'occhiata a https://learnosm.org/it/
Grazie, ciao!
soniabu (2025-05-13 12:16:23+00:00): scusami tanto per queste incoerenze. Starrò più attenta in fututo e spero di non crearti ancora lavoro per i miei errori.
Robert Whittaker (2020-04-25 11:08:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84100799 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 83959590 following consultation with mapper: Unlicensed source was used to add postbox ref=* tags.
limes11 (2020-09-05 21:05:30+00:00): Hi, 

was ist mit der Linie 794933871, die hier hinzugefuegt wurde. Sie hat keine Eigenschaften, siehe Note 2336700. 

Und wie ist Weg 172861949 zu verstehen? Er endet an einem Ende an einem Weg, der nicht betreten werden darf. Ist das eine Sackgasse? Oder sollte auch auf diesen Weg ein access=no?

Gruss, Limes
tm1805 (2020-09-10 07:48:08+00:00): Hey Limes,
das ist ein Trampelpfad (794933871), der an wie du schon richtig gesehen hast an dem (Wirtschafts-) Weg 172861949 entlang eines Abwasserkanals endet. Dieser ist begehbar, jedoch nur von einer Seite erreichbar, da die andere Seite mit einem Tor abgesperrt wurde (access=no macht demnach Sinn; besser wäre "eingeschränkt").
limes11 (2020-09-10 07:56:39+00:00): Hi, 

okay, so ganz verstehe ich es aber noch nicht. Der Weg mit access=no (93334185), ist es denn legal, den von der westl. Seite zu betreten? Wenn nicht, sollten die angrenzenden Wege nicht auch access=no haben? Das Tor laesst sich ja auch ueber 220398390 umgehen.
tm1805 (2020-09-10 08:14:52+00:00): Hey :)

Zumindest gibt es keine Tore oder Hürden, wenn das Areal von der westl. Seite (über den Pfad 172861949) betreten wird. Soweit ich mich erinnere gibt es entlang des Pfades 172861949 auch keine Hinweisschilder, die das Betreten untersagen. Ob das Betreten dadurch "Legal" ist, kann ich nicht beurteilen, da ich kein Jurist bin. Allerdings ist das Areal nicht als Privatgrundstück, oder als umzäuntes Gebiet kariert. Der Begriff Trampelpfad impliziert an dieser Stelle aber auch, das es sich dabei um keinen öffentlichen Weg handelt, sondern durch häufiges Begehen durch Menschen entstanden ist. Ich habe dazu nochmals einen Hinweis erstellt (Hinweis Nr. 2342203).
user_10241830 (2020-07-01 19:30:47+00:00): Hallo,

du hast die Linie 549 mit network=VRN getaggt. Hältst du das für eine gute Idee? Die Linie verläuft vollständig innerhalb des KVV und es werden in den Bussen auch nur KVV-Fahrscheine und keine VRN-Fahrscheine verkauft. Meines Erachtens müsste die Linie, so wie sie in der Vergangenheit auch schon erfasst war (siehe Versionsgeschichte) als KVV-Linie erfasst werden und würde dann in der KVV-Auswertung erscheinen, ebenso wie alle anderen Linien im Landkreis Germersheim, die keine Berührungspunkte mit dem VRN-Gebiet aufweisen. Die Linien, die das VRN-Gebiet betreten - wenn auch nur für eine Bushaltestelle (siehe Hayna) würden dann doppelt erfasst werden (network=KVV;VRN).
Stur am PTNA würde ich die Zuordnung zu VRN oder KVV nicht festmachen, denn das kann man bei Bedarf ändern.
Nakaner (2020-07-01 21:21:38+00:00): Hallo,

der Kreis Germersheim ist doch KVV-Gebiet, wobei für ein- und ausbrechende Fahrten auch bestimmte VRN-Fahrausweise verkauft werden (vielleicht nicht im Bus, aber sie sind anderswo erhältlich und gelten dort). Daher wäre ein network=KVV;VRN (bzw. ausgeschrieben) doch sinnvoll?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Rainero (2020-07-02 08:14:44+00:00): Hallo eiskalt-glasklar und Michael,
ich hatte u.a. GTFS-Daten herangezogen, um die Lücken in den Relationen zu verifizieren. Der VRN liefert GTFS-Daten für die 5xxer Linien, beim KVV sind sie jedoch nicht enthalten. Daher habe ich network=VRN eingetragen. Aber sicherlich ist Michaels Vorschlag, das Gebiet als Übergangsgebiet KVV/VRN mit network=KVV;VRN einzutragen, die bessere Lösung. Es ist ja in den Tarifgebietsplänen beider Verkehrsverbünde enthalten. 

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Frans S (2020-04-24 17:04:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please pay attention on the squaring of buildings you map with the Q key. Especially the manual mapped buildings. By hand it is very difficult to draw a good rectangular. The system is very secure on that
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83959750
edvac (2020-05-01 12:14:22+00:00): Ola:

Semella que isto é unha importación de datos do IDEG da Xunta de Galicia. Podes indicar ónde está documentada esta importación e se seguíu as Import Guidelines [1]? Grazas.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
edvac (2020-08-27 09:18:13+00:00): Revertido changeset por importación de datos non documentada nin aprobada: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90015865
Robert Whittaker (2020-04-25 11:07:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84100770 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 83959791 following consultation with mapper: Unlicensed source was used to add postbox ref=* tags.
Robert Whittaker (2020-04-25 11:07:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84100750 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 83959979 following consultation with mapper: Unlicensed source was used to add postbox ref=* tags.
StefanB (2020-04-22 21:04:39+00:00): Hvala, do sedaj sem bil prepričan, da to ni potrebno, ampak izgleda, da te vrednosti niso privzete:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions
Anže Žitnik (2020-04-23 09:00:59+00:00): Tudi jaz sem gledal ta dokument, ki je očitno le (še) ne implementiran predlog.
Nisem pa prepričan, če je moj popravek najprimernejši način za označbo te ceste, zato sem dal v review.
Tole sem sicer opazil zato, ker me je neka kolesarska navigacija hotela peljati na obvoznico :)
andergrin (2020-05-05 04:52:35+00:00): Нетреба в name вносити назви населених пунктів, які з'єднує дорога
Frans S (2020-04-24 14:26:54+00:00): Hello Rara. Can you please stick to the mapping requirements on this project ? no woods, no waterbodies.
The common used tag for buildings is building=yes
from our armchair we cannot conclude if it is a house, barn etc. so building=yes is all we want to tag here. Local mappers will adjust them
Again, square each building you map with the Q key and be more precise in mapping buildings.

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83960719
Frans S (2020-04-24 14:38:07+00:00): Hello LornaErin. I reviewed your mappings on this changeset and have some remarks. 
1. there is no need to map all short tracks from a highway to buildings. When the object is visible from the highway ( most are) there is no need to map them.
2. you connect the ending nodes of the paths you mapped often to a node of a building. Please don't do that because that are errors and have to be corrected. Never connect nodes of highways to other features like buildings and landuse features
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83960823
Frans S (2020-04-28 08:26:27+00:00): Hello Rara, I reviewed this task as well.
4 building mapped very rough, oversized and not squared. See my previous message about squaring
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83960964
Rara1982 (2020-04-28 10:17:11+00:00): Hi Frans 
i took these areas already half mapped i thought the fact that am seeing the building markings out of the correct area while the person who did it thought it is correct probably my connection or my resolution so i didn't remove their tags , should we delete tags of others ??
Frans S (2020-04-28 10:38:15+00:00): Hello Rara. Thanks for your reaction.
Please do not delete other mappers work. Leave that to the validators.
It is normal that mappings of a particular task has been mapped by different mappers.
Be sure when you start on an partial mapped task that you correct the offset. 
Others mappings should be in line with the object behind it.
 See the instructions how to do that.
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
look for the correct offset section
best regards
Frans S (2020-04-24 13:52:28+00:00): Hello. Please pay more attention how you map buildings and square them with the Q key in RapiD.
btw .Have you have yourself introduced on the Crowd2map Tanzania Slack channel?
Are you familiar whith these documents?
https://crowd2map.slack.com/files/U4HH3QGJZ/FU6MH8AHK/get_started_crowd2map_rev_4f.pdf?origin_team=T4B7W3DTR&origin_channel=C4BD0RCJU
and this one
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83960986
Frans S (2020-04-28 08:24:39+00:00): Hello Rara. I reviewed this changeset as well.
What you see here are rocks I removed this mapping 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83960992
Frans S (2020-04-24 13:41:54+00:00): Hello Rara.  about the highway leading east west
Should you map and tag this highway after reading the guidance for road tags ?
Best remove it because it comes from nowhere en leads also to nowhere
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961304
mapman44 (2020-04-23 00:03:16+00:00): Thanks for your edits putting things back as they were. 

The roundabout at Camino de Los Mares and Camino del Rio and Bonanza needs some work. Would you like to fix it or shall I? Here's the Wiki article about how to map roundabouts the OSM way: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#How_to_map
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961358
Frans S (2020-04-24 13:29:37+00:00): Hello. I am reviewing this changeset.
See my remarks on other changesets
Please read this document for better understanding how to map and tag highways
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
You mapped 2 buildings here. Oversized and not squared. Please be more accurate and square the buildings with the Q key in RapiD or iDeditor (these were manual mapped buildings ?) 
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961492
mapman44 (2020-04-22 22:34:01+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to OSM. Just a tip...your buildings look good but will look neater if they have square corners. Here's how: just select the building and press the Q key. Thanks.
Frans S (2020-04-24 11:36:59+00:00): Reviewed as per your request. See my comments on other changesets
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961632
mariotomo (2021-07-29 20:34:47+00:00): hola. me entero tarde, te comento ahora que me entero. es más útil mapear waterway/highway si son CONECTADOS el uno con el otro.  aquí dejaste un pressurized terminar a pocos metros de un stream, el mismo stream termina en un área natural=water, y de este vuelve a salir.  es necesario conectarlos. el mismo pressurized empieza de la nada, cerca de "La Laguna", en que entra otro waterway … , de un punto de vista hidrológico todas estas "way" sin conexiones no cuadran.
(cuando tengas dudas, por favor aprovecha de los canales de socialización disponibles.)
mariotomo (2021-07-29 20:49:44+00:00): (las cascadas son para puntos en que el agua cae en vertical, entiendes que no aplica a elemento lineares, sólo a nodos, sino serían rápidas. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Drapids)
mariotomo (2021-07-29 20:52:02+00:00): yo no las veo y sin verlo no lo puedo mejorar. te sugiero poner en waterway=stream como elemento linear y un área natural=water/water=rapids para indicar la zona interesada por las rápidas.
mariotomo (2021-07-29 21:35:19+00:00): otra cosa: cuidad con la clasificación de las carreteras. aquí varios tramos "tertiary" que no se entienden. y siempre intenta conectar lo que dibujas con la viabilidad existente, sino tiene poco sentido.
Frans S (2020-04-28 08:21:28+00:00): Hello Rara. I reviewed your work. Please map more accurate. See this picture.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=12Q_rVozO99oQnH6QNa-DVqtappSTWNe8
The big square is not a building. You overlapped also a building , the top building exists out of 3 buildings.
And.... Do not forget to square the buildings you map.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961722
Frans S (2020-04-23 17:46:50+00:00): Hello. See my remarks about highways on other changesets
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961812
Frans S (2020-04-23 17:50:46+00:00): Hello. I adjusted the tagging and mapping of highways
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961858
Frans S (2020-04-23 17:24:16+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. Never tag a road leading from another highway  to buildings as track. Track is reserved for access to farmland , woodland etc.

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961941
Frans S (2020-04-23 17:34:32+00:00): Reviewed your mappings. Please read the wiki about how to tag highways. See this page 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
There is no need to map roads/paths which are good visible from the highway where it connect to.
Residential tag , only to be used in urban areas. Here tag these highways as unclassified. Also check the width of a highway to see if you should tag it as a path or a highway
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83961941
RicoElectrico (2020-04-23 10:03:34+00:00): Cześć, zapis nazwy ulicy w adresach nie zgadza się z nazwą ulicy w OSM. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7435321765
Arnebius (2020-04-24 19:37:13+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za informację. Korzystam ostatnio intensywnie z danych z budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl i coraz częściej zauważam, że nazwy w stylu aleje, place mają odmiennie stosowaną pisownie. W tym przypadku z powyższej strony jest to "aleja gen. Józefa Hallera", w geoportal.gov.pl jest to już "Aleja gen. Józefa Hallera", a w OSM ""Aleja Generała Józefa Hallera". A tak przy okazji to chyba się poznaliśmy na konferencji State of The Map w Poznaniu sprzed dwóch lat. Pozdrawiam, dane zaraz skoryguję do zgodności z OSM.
mapman44 (2020-04-22 22:30:28+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to OSM. Just a tip...your buildings will look neater if they have square corners. Here's how: just select the building and press the Q key. Thanks.
mapman44 (2020-04-22 22:28:16+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to OSM. Just a tip...your buildings will look neater if they have square corners. Here's how: just select the building and press the Q key. Thanks.
ralley (2020-04-22 22:30:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Review as reuested: looks good to me, only thing is a large percentage of NZ houses consist of 90 degree corners.  You can make all corners 90 degrees in Id by selecting the outline and pressing 'Q' or right click and select 'Square'.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83962412
CoyKoi (2020-04-23 01:45:00+00:00): Welcome! Further to the comment above - I would suggest using the JOSM editor if you want to add many buildings, as it makes the process MUCH faster and easier for you, check out this video to learn more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcKewl94jR4
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83962412
Jacques Lavignotte (2020-04-24 21:09:07+00:00): Bonsoir $user Merci de vos contributions à OSM. Vous avez demandé que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications. Je n'y vois rien à redire. N'hésitez pas à revenir et bonne suite à votre participation au projet. Jacques
fmarier (2020-04-25 15:53:51+00:00): Hi Barb.
Thanks for adding extra details about this busines. It turns out that was already an entry for Sushi Maro on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4435421597. Perhaps you missed it when you added it to the wrong location?

In addition, I noticed two other things in your change:
- There were some unrelated and seemingly accidental changes to the SkyTrain entrance.
- The phone number was not in the correct format. The correct format for North America is +1-areacode-phonenumber.

I reverted your change and added all of the new information you provided to the existing point of interest: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84111291

Best.
Francois
KPG (2020-05-12 18:09:15+00:00): Bahnlinien ohne Spuren werden - wenn überhaupt - als razed gekennzeichnet, nicht als abandoned. Ein paar habe ich korrigiert, den Rest korrigiere bitte selbst.
Nmxosm (2020-04-23 07:17:50+00:00): Hallo Eljot8472,

ist es richtig so, dass https://osm.org/way/345659208 jetzt die Grenze der Kleingartenanlage überquert?

VlG Nmxosm
Eljot8472 (2020-04-23 12:04:07+00:00): Ich schau mir das mal an.
Nmxosm (2020-04-24 17:52:16+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.

VlG Nmxosm
mapman44 (2020-04-22 22:14:16+00:00): Thanks for your OSM contributions. Just a tip...you can square up the corners by selecting the building and pressing the Q key.
Glassman (2020-04-22 23:20:50+00:00): Amazon will love you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83963629
James_Dor (2020-04-23 00:11:51+00:00): Want to see if my Tesla will now drive itself down my driveway better with Smart Summon!
Glassman (2020-04-23 00:18:58+00:00): And when Amazon starts delivery with their own company, they will also be happy.

We've had quite a few telsa owners adding driveways and especially parking lots to they can summons it. We have a dedicated #tesla channel on the US Slack if you are interested in learning more.
Frans S (2020-04-23 17:06:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. The buildings you mapped are not squared.
Please square each building you map, be accurate in following the outlines when you draw the building by yourself, and square the building with the Q key ( I corrected them)
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83963701
Frans S (2020-04-23 17:11:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I reviewed your work and have some remarks.
You mapped paths here. Be sure to connect them to other highways to get a network. There is no need to map paths which leads to areas with no hamlets etc. 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83963831
Frans S (2020-04-23 17:16:57+00:00): Thanks for mapping here. I reviewed your work and have some comments.
Please connect al paths/highways to each other to get a network. you did not connect nodes of a path to another path. Please keep an eye on that
I corrected it
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83963831
Aish2602 (2020-04-25 02:39:35+00:00): Thanks for all the feedback. Will keep this in mind for my next mapping.

Question- What are the pink boxes with lines on them? I don't see a feature such as 'building' assigned to it, just curious what that represents. I'm seeing both the red boxes(building) and pink ones, not sure which to use.
Frans S (2020-04-25 09:35:37+00:00): Hi. I did not know the answer myself but get this from a colleague 

The pink boxes are the AI suggestions for buildings - along with the Pink lines suggesting roads they rare the out put of the AI Algorithms  - Click on one and look to the left panel; - you can then choose to use the feature or not - care should be taken as sometimes they need to be edited for size/rotation/grouping buildings - and the road tag must also be checked as it often incorrectly defaults to Residential Road -
Best regards
Aish2602 (2020-04-28 23:25:54+00:00): Got it, thank you!
mapman44 (2020-04-22 23:34:30+00:00): Just a tip...those buildings will look better if the corners are squared up. Just select and press the Q key. Thanks.
mueschel (2020-04-23 07:32:00+00:00): Hi,
please check the 240 generators you edited here, there are tags with spelling mistakes:
genarator:type=horizontal_axis
generatorplant=output

Jan
Frans S (2020-04-23 15:49:15+00:00): Hello , Thanks for mapping. You are a new mapper and your work will be reviewed by a validator
The path you mapped is good and accurate.
1 issue. You connected the end of a path to the node of a building. This is an error. Never connect nodes of highways to other features, like buildings and landuse
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83963978
GinaroZ (2020-04-25 17:22:24+00:00): Thanks for updating this area, but I've changed the gym as you've indicated it's not yet open https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/795005115
Olla_Ko (2020-04-25 14:32:37+00:00): It's a vandalism
edits were reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83964048