piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2015-10-01 11:31:03+00:00): If you mean "Google Street View" I'm afraid Google's terms and conditions don't allow it to be used for OSM.  See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Faq#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details.
dataOne (2015-10-01 11:41:46+00:00): yeah you are right. As a matter of fact if you just look at osm location, Its clearly visible here too that A14 seems to be an overhead bridge/road to the connecting road of Nasby road and other yellow road.
DaveF (2015-10-05 16:51:48+00:00): As you are making no valid edits, could you please refrain from splitting ways. If & when you have maxheadroom please follow the guidelines here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight
Rovastar (2015-10-06 15:50:03+00:00): Can someone explain in plain speaking English what is wrong with a user splitting ways?
These comments here are not to help or educate the user just trying go find blame where there is none. 
Is the new policy that if you split ways you are banned? Sounds like some users forgot osm is a community project and want it as there own map.
Zain Ahmad Hashmi (2015-10-07 10:57:59+00:00): Dear Frederik,

I am working on behalf of company called ‘PIE Mapping’. They are in the middle of migrating to OSM platform. I have been assigned a task to split the OSM street links as these links are not split to its junctions. In some places they are slightly longer and does not fit the purpose for routing/navigation. 

Please see an example below. The line highlighted in yellow shows the current OSM street links,  and if they tag a height restriction to this link.  It will then assign that height restriction to the entire link which won’t be good for the navigation purpose. Therefore they want to split this link into two links so they can assign a height restriction only to the line highlighted in pink to make sure that the height restriction is only at that place where there is a overhead bridge so it avoids the section highlighted in pink instead. I hope this explanation helps. 

https://img42.com/XqzcY
 
For further details please contact Mustafa Khokhar at mustafa@piemapping.com
karussell (2015-10-01 11:13:14+00:00): Please review as this road is clearly too long!
karussell (2015-10-01 11:14:10+00:00): I get:
infinity distance? for way:356352472
infinity distance? for way:360780242
:)
SimonPoole (2015-10-06 14:29:05+00:00): @apcroads I hope you realize that your additions are at odds with the import guidelines in multiple aspects http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and are likely to be wholesale reverted if you don't quickly make amends.
apcroads (2015-10-06 14:30:46+00:00): Simon, the roads have been deleted.
woodpeck (2015-10-06 15:05:03+00:00): I have recommended discussing this import on the imports list via https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/817
SomeoneElse (2015-10-10 10:12:41+00:00): @apcroads some of the roads imported here are still present and problematical.  For example, is the name of 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355479605 really "worthey 14-16h"?  Should it actually be joined to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355479592 (and is that really called "worthey road c"?).

I'd suggest reverting this and other similar changesets (such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34111877 ) and waiting until after discussion before import.  The USA has been subject to a number of poor imports previously, please let's not make it any worse.
anderfo (2024-05-06 11:31:55+00:00): Hi,
for the way 372849740 (which you created in this changeset, about 8 years ago) and its nearby segments 180725577, 1128002256 and 1128002255 which probably stem from the same original way, I struggle to understand what mtb:scale=2;0 means.

Can you clarify?

Normally the semicolon means that this tag could have both values, but for mtb:scale you need to select a single value...

Also, since this way is tagged with tracktype=grade3, I have a hard time imagining that the mtb:scale should be very different from 0.
Would you mind reconsidering the mtb:scale for this road?
Stereo (2015-09-29 18:58:28+00:00): Tiens, pour tes fixes de polygones, tu connais osmose? http://osmose.openstreetmap.lu/fr/map/#country=luxembourg&zoom=12&lat=49.5&lon=6&item=1xxx
SHARCRASH (2015-09-30 08:41:51+00:00): Hello, oui je connais. :) Mais une fois que l'erreur est enregistrée, elle y reste tant que personne ne l'aura effacé d'OSMose, même si déjà corrigé entre-temps. Ca donne l'impression d'y perdre notre temps, alors OSMi m'est suffisant. A la prochaine mise à joru d'OSMi il n'y aura pratiquement plus rien à corriger si aucune nouvelle erreur n'a été introduite d'ici-là.
ikiya (2015-09-29 16:39:45+00:00): Please stop mass editing.
Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community.
DannyAiquipa (2015-09-29 17:34:59+00:00): Hello Ikiya, thanks for your feedback , I am aligning major roads (primary, secondary, trunk) based on GIS Imagery ort (http://cyberjapandata.gsi.go.jp/xyz/ort/{z}/{x}/{y}.jpg
pnorman (2015-09-30 06:18:53+00:00): There's nothing wrong with improving alignment, but before continuing this large-scale edit, can you communicate with the Japanese community on the talk-ja@ list about what you'd like to do, and seek their feedback?

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
ikiya (2015-09-30 10:42:10+00:00): Thanks for your comment.
Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project.
(Japan Community mailing lists)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html
DannyAiquipa (2015-09-30 20:41:04+00:00):  Hello Ikiya, thanks for your feedback @planemad told me he has been in touch, I am aligning major roads (primary, secondary, trunk) - details here - https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/120
GerdP (2015-10-07 17:36:16+00:00): please review,
ways have strange highway tag:
way 372855523,way 34869184
ikiya (2015-09-29 16:43:34+00:00): Please stop mass editing.
Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community.
samely (2015-09-29 17:06:53+00:00): Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I'm aligning principal roads (primary, secondary and tertiary) based on GIS imagery. In this case I aligned tertiary roads.
ikiya (2015-09-30 10:34:15+00:00): Thank you for your explanation.
I understand. 
Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project.
(Japan Community mailing lists)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html
ikiya (2015-09-29 16:40:40+00:00): Please stop mass editing.
Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community.
calfarome (2015-09-29 17:45:00+00:00): Hello Ikiya.Thanks for your feedback. I'm aligning principal roads (primary, secondary and tertiary) following the instructions on http://tasks.openstreetmap.in/project/45
ikiya (2015-09-30 10:47:28+00:00): Thanks for your comment.
I understand. 
Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project.
(Japan Community mailing lists)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html
calfarome (2015-09-30 20:46:00+00:00): Hello Ikiya.Thanks for your feedback. @planemad told me he has been in touch, too. I'm aligning principal roads (primary, secondary and tertiary) following the instructions on mapbox/mapping#120
Andreas Binder (2015-09-29 19:09:35+00:00): Solltest Du Drehkreuz als Tag nicht gefunden haben, es wäre barrier=turnstile

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dturnstile
Pannenfuchs (2015-10-06 17:29:53+00:00): Hab's geändert,
Danke!
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-09-29 18:12:43+00:00): Czemu bocianie gniazdo zostało usunięte?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-09-29 18:57:40+00:00): Wycofałem ten zestaw zmian. Proszę w przyszłości o uważniejsze edycje i dodawanie wyczerpujących opisów do wysyłanych zmian.
d1g (2016-01-30 16:01:50+00:00): shop=chemist правильный тег был
SHARCRASH (2015-10-04 15:50:02+00:00): Hello,

I'm letting you know that OSMi reported errors since your changeset:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=6.97606&lat=50.33216&zoom=13&opacity=0.95&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags

Before memory fades, it would be better that you rectify. Thanks!
Gehrke (2015-10-04 15:58:05+00:00): Fixed. Was one of those public transportation relations
Gehrke (2015-10-04 15:59:28+00:00): Major changes where necessary in this area because boundaries were completely wrong.
SHARCRASH (2015-10-04 16:01:24+00:00): Nice catch!  :)
Владимир К (2015-12-29 08:48:22+00:00): Не нужно вешать на линию пешеходного перехода crossing=traffic_signals, это тэг для точки пересечения линий
GerdP (2015-12-29 09:07:22+00:00): Feel free to improve it, I just tried to fix
the tag highway=crossing;traffic_signals
luiswoo (2015-09-30 17:31:49+00:00): Добавить в описание пакета, что это грунтовая дорога не достаточно, нужно добавить тег highway=track  на линию. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Лучше это делать хотя бы через редактор ID, там грунтовка в заготовках обозвана "Сельскохозяйственная\лесная дорога"
GerdP (2015-10-29 09:37:26+00:00): please review:
way 372866639,way 372859872
The tag highway=hike is only used here,
guess you meant highway=path?
Turleder'n (2015-10-29 09:57:23+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. The "paths" are on a glacier. I should have used piste=hike. I'll fix this.
GerdP (2015-10-29 10:01:50+00:00): okay, please note that there is already a way tagged route=ski
Turleder'n (2015-10-29 10:09:36+00:00): I changed to highway=path. On the satellite photo there is no snow. This varies with the season. The skiing routes in winter differ from the summer hiking routes on the glacier.
GerdP (2015-10-29 10:25:21+00:00): okay, I understand. Thanks!
flohoff (2015-09-29 23:09:15+00:00): Hi,
mir ist dein Changeset hier aufgefallen weil du keinen Changeset kommentar gesetzt hast. 

Ausserdem hast du scheinbar Gebäude mit iD von Bing abgezeichnet/korrigiert. Typischerweise ist das eher kontraproduktiv da dann Lage und Geometriefehler auftreten dadurch das die Bing Bilder typischerweise schlecht georeferenziert sind. 

In NRW dürfen wir sowohl das LIegenschaftskataster ALKIS wie auch die Luftbilder des Landesvermessungsamtes benutzen. Diese sind deutlich besser georeferenziert. 

Dazu kann man mit dem Tracer2 und Josm die Gebäudeoutlines semi-automatisch aus dem ALKIS abnehmen.

Flo
naoliv (2015-09-29 20:47:01+00:00): fernandeswo, os pontos de ônibus que você apagou não existem mais?
fernandeswo (2015-09-30 00:18:38+00:00): Não a linha de ônibus que ali parava está parando no ponto de baixo
kuhni74 (2022-04-11 11:30:38+00:00): Die Hütte "Alm" kann ja nicht einfach nur "Alm" heißen - in der ÖK50 und basemap lese ich "Wengerhütte" - "Wengeralm"?
Polarbear (2015-09-30 23:07:40+00:00): Warum löschst du den Namen der Stadt in der Sprache Afrikaans, der am 2013-01-13 von User FireFishy eingefügt wurde? (name:af=Napels)
Fritz18 (2015-10-01 07:02:49+00:00): Das war unbeabsichtigt passiert, ich wollte eigentlich nur die Reihenfolge der angezeigten mehrsprachigen Namen ändern. Aber da sie ohnehin Naples lautet wie in zahlreichen anderen Sprachen auch, fehlt sie nicht wirklich.
Polarbear (2015-10-01 08:46:33+00:00): Die Daten kommen im XML-Format aus einer Datenbank. Ich glaube nicht dass du auf die Reihenfolge der Darstellung in iD Einfluss hast.

Es gibt aber eine Undo-Funktion in iD zum Rückgängigmachen, und man braucht fehlerhafte Änderungen nicht zu speichern.

Repariert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34362802
Polarbear (2015-10-01 08:47:56+00:00): Wenn du genau hinschaust, ist es in NL und AF Napels und nicht Naples.

Und der Eintrag fehlte wirklich, weil jemand der die AF-Namen anzeigen will halt keinen mehr hat!
m902 (2016-01-15 23:33:46+00:00): There seems to be a problem with the Donhead St Mary relation. One member of the relation has the role 'c' which is invalid. Could you take another look please?
Colin Smale (2016-01-16 00:15:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for noticing that. It is fixed now - the correct role is admin_centre.
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-30 04:53:51+00:00): There are a number of problems with this changeset.  It seems like you have an interest in editing major roads, including splitting and combining them.  I highly recommend that you invest some time in learning the standalone editor JOSM instead of the in-browser editor iD.  A number of the problems with this changeset would have been flagged as errors or warnings in JOSM, which you could have resolved prior to uploading.

The general idea of splitting McLoughin into a dual carriageway makes sense since there is what looks to be a traffic island separating each side of the road.

I know this has been mentioned before, but in OSM we don't generally abbreviate street names.  For the name tag, don't use "SE McLoughlin Blvd", but instead use "Southeast McLoughlin Boulevard".  It might be better to copy all of the tags from the existing road onto the new segment you are creating.  Then you can just add the oneway=yes tag to each leg and possibly adjust other tags like lanes and sidewalk.

JOSM does a much better job than iD when it comes to presenting Relation objects to you.  This segment of road is a part of a number of route relations and a turn restriction relation.  I've already fixed the bus route relations as I was editing simultaneously and I needed to resolve the conflicting versions before saving.

There is a right-turn only relation that is now broken because the "to" road of it is disconnected from the "via" Node and the "from" road.  However, as this is now a connection from the Fred Meyer parking lot onto what is now a one-way section of McLoughin, the turn restriction is now superfluous and can be deleted.

If U-turns are not allowed at either end of the divided portion of McLoughin, then there needs to be turn restrictions such as "no_u_turn" or "only_straight_on".  If you don't know this information, then don't add the turn restrictions.

For the Safeway that closed, don't just amend the text "(CLOSED)" to the name tag.  Assuming that the building is still there, just leave the building tag and all the addr tags, but delete the tags that are specific to the Safeway such as name and shop=supermarket.  If there were other tags like phone, opening_hours, or website, then those would be deleted as well.

For service roads that intersect buildings (drive-throughs), connect the Way object for the road to the Closed Way object for the building at the points where they intersect.  Then split the Way object for the road into 3 objects and put a tunnel=building_passage tag on it.

Overall, it would also be helpful to associate source information with the changeset.  Did you actually travel to this location or are you just looking at aerial photos?  If you are using iD, I believe you have to put this directly into the changeset comment as you can't edit the other changeset tags, such as source, directly.
granova (2016-06-03 14:14:36+00:00): trabajadores de educación :EEP
agranizo (2015-09-30 13:41:35+00:00): Hola, Ecuador Tur,

te quería preguntar si en verdad no existe carretera despues del Río Portoviejo o es un error?

Saluidos cordiales, 

agranizo
Ecuador Tur (2015-09-30 13:48:44+00:00): Buenas dias
esto hubo problema con josm
ayer corregui mis errores

hay problema por ahora ?
digame para  chequear
nicolas17 (2015-11-29 06:06:48+00:00): Este cambio rompió unas cuantas cosas. Por ejemplo los nodos de Pueyrredón 1400 y 1500 ahora están uno al lado del otro, lo cual no tiene sentido. Lo mismo con Viamonte 1400 y 1500, y Alsina 700 y 800. El nodo 2274051778 ahora dice Alsina 123 en la esquina que antes decía Alsina 699. Los nodos POI de la calle Cochabamba ya no son parte de la vía de interpolación (por qué?). Etc etc.

Además, este cambio (al igual que el 90% de los cambios de serock) no tiene un mensaje diciendo qué se cambió y por qué.
AgusQui (2015-11-29 16:57:39+00:00): Aparentemente quiso separar las vías de interpolacion en las esquinas y se hizo lío:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=34336901
serock (2015-12-01 18:16:34+00:00): Hola, al usar el GPS por calle y numero, nuca pude dar con el lugar donde quería ir en Banfield, tuve que usar un punto de referencia para llegar, después con tiempo anote las altura de las calles de la zona donde iba, al llegar a casa me puse a editar las alturas, algunas corregí y otras se ve que no, pero bueno es parte de los seres humanos "equivocarnos" y al ser este, es un proyecto colaborativo (y no un proyecto personal), los errores nunca faltan, y es bueno aprender de ellos, abrazos.
Nakaner (2015-09-30 22:32:20+00:00): Pass auf, dass du dir den Schreibfehler nicht angewöhnst: construction (in railway=construction oder highway=construction) schreibt man ohne k, also nicht "construcktion), wie es dir am Silbersee in Lohsa passiert ist.

Ich habe nicht geschaut, wie oft dir das noch passiert ist.
JochenB (2015-10-02 10:51:05+00:00): Hallo Nakaner, 
Danke für den Hinweis! Ich hab die Strecke ab Knappenrode bis Horka entsprechend bearbeitet, werde heute abend schauen, ob ich den Fehler woanders auch gemacht habe.
Grüße, 
Jochen
JochenB (2015-10-03 22:10:17+00:00): Habs überprüft, war nur dort passiert.
Hjart (2016-11-03 14:38:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/771050
zecho (2015-09-29 23:20:50+00:00): Mauvaise description des changements dû à une modification faite à un endroit complètement différent…
taufik hidayat1172 (2017-03-29 10:08:38+00:00): jln.pelajar
blackboxlogic (2020-09-30 02:12:22+00:00): The street sign has "frances", where did you get "francis"?
https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=ad86cfe3-6d3d-40ae-8562-7cdf51c50918&cp=44.806862~-68.791097&lvl=19&dir=66.794975&pi=-1.4119389&style=x&mo=z.3.6&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
BGRDave (2020-10-04 20:44:54+00:00): Looking back through my references, I honestly can't say. Thanks for catching and correcting my mistake!
dudka (2015-09-30 10:19:40+00:00): http://marsovet.org.ua/upload/usr/Falkovskij/street_new%20%282%29.doc

в офіційному переліку вулиць "Халхінгольська", а не "Халхин-Гольська"..
Ars-UA (2015-09-30 10:31:01+00:00): Можливо й так, Виправив на Халкінгольську.
Chabior (2015-10-09 13:16:01+00:00): Zmieniłem z powrotem tagowanie na railway=abandoned poniższych odcinków:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198857088
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198857091

Na podkładzie z Geoportalu widać jeszcze tory, ale ok. dwóch lat temu zostały one rozebrane.
user_717069 (2015-10-26 15:34:41+00:00): Jeśli zostały rozebrane, to prawidłowo. Jakby udało się to ustalić, można jeszcze dopisać end_date.
Владимир К (2015-11-05 12:37:58+00:00): Неправильно занесено расписание расботы торгового центра. Не нужно повторять opening_hours=opening_hours=*, достаточно opening_hours=*
voschix (2016-02-09 11:35:30+00:00): Ho scoperto per caso una discrepanza di numero civico (node: 3764971560). Sulla mappa è civico 48, ma il ristorante lì, "Al Vwecio Mulin", dice che sono al civico 66.
przemas75 (2016-03-04 09:29:43+00:00): A Park dlaczego?
Supaplex (2015-09-30 17:40:44+00:00): 大墩路一帶有建築重疊狀況
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34343294
Supaplex (2015-09-30 17:31:39+00:00): 這次跟前一次編輯
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34343089
大墩十二街這一帶有重覆建築的狀況了
要麻煩看一下是什麼問題
yellowsoar (2015-10-01 00:51:23+00:00): 這一區建物的長寬不是很合理，
空照圖上看起來似乎是同棟分層分號而非排屋，
請再次確認。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372961176
Durko_freemap (2015-10-01 05:25:12+00:00): Martin, ak tie ulice su oneway (jednosmerky), dokonca jednosmerka a zacina opacna jednosmerka, ako sa da dostat z konca tych ulic naspat?
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-05-07 02:11:40+00:00): Hi, Alaska Dave. I deleted this building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/372968773) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you
AlaskaDave (2021-05-07 02:35:51+00:00): No problem. Things change quickly in Thailand. I added this building five years ago and used imagery that was not as good as what is available now. Please feel free to update anything I added that long ago
Deanna Earley (2015-09-30 11:37:36+00:00): Is there a source for these deleted shops?, and is that tree really an entire park now?
trigpoint (2015-09-30 11:47:39+00:00): The tube and road geometry had also been messed up, I have reverted this in changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34345170
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:57:43+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372981958
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 13:26:25+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50227164
teddyfox78 (2015-10-01 16:40:02+00:00): http://wikimapia.org/12687753/ru/«Золотая-миля»
literan (2015-10-03 07:15:46+00:00): ну и что? может, вы же это туда и внесли, ну или еще кто-то :) Я же не удалил, а перенес в loc_name
Alecs01 (2015-09-30 18:47:26+00:00): bei dettagli, grazie anche per la nota a Somma! ti faccio solo un appunto, via Rastrello Rosso a Sesto http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34779343 la lascierei come residential invece che track anche se non è asfaltata (ci sta un surface=ground o quello che è); la differenza tra le due è data dalla funzione della strada, non dalle caratteristiche fisiche, in questo caso mi sembra una stradina che porta ad alcune case, non è ad uso agricolo nè forestale, sbaglio? ciao
naoliv (2015-09-30 12:46:27+00:00): Manoel, você inseriu vários objetos contendo apenas o nome.
Alguns deles não dá para saber ao certo do que se tratam.
O que seriam eles? (como no caso da BMW Agricola aqui)
chris66 (2015-11-03 13:22:37+00:00): Naja, ein Navi welches Autos über footway lotst sollte schleunigst entsorgt werden.
jacek_zwik (2015-10-06 20:05:37+00:00): Od kiedy na Śnieżkę wolno wjeżdżać rowerem? Masz za dużo drobnych? Jak straż parku Ciebie złapie, to niekoniecznie skończy się na pouczeniu. Można wjechać na szczyt ale tylko w czasie rajdów. Ale jest to wydarzenie sezonowe zwykle jednodniowe i nie upoważnia do stałego tagu bicycle=yes. Normalni ta droga ma status bicycle=no.
PrzemekP (2015-10-06 21:10:55+00:00): dzięki za informację - nie wiedziałem o tym zakazie, ale osobiście widziałem dwóch rowerzystów zjeżdżających ze Śnieżki - w sierpniu tego roku
jacek_zwik (2015-10-07 08:30:44+00:00): Dla informacji - zerknij sobie tutaj:
http://www.kpnmab.pl/pl/turystyka-rowerowa,148
oraz tutaj:
http://www.forumrowerowe.org/topic/138136-rowerem-na-sniezke/
Miłego dnia
SomeoneElse (2015-09-30 13:37:57+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34039817 I asked why you were splitting roads but leaving identically tagged parts behind that aren't part of any relations?  That's still happening here.  

Can you explain why I shouldn't immediately just merge these three ways back together again?
Zain Ahmad Hashmi (2015-10-26 13:25:34+00:00): i have split the road due to height restriction
SomeoneElse (2015-10-26 13:28:58+00:00): Where did the height data come from?
Zain Ahmad Hashmi (2015-10-26 13:52:31+00:00):  I am working on behalf of company called ‘PIE Mapping’. They are in the middle of migrating to OSM platform. They provided us height/width/weight data. For further details please contact Mustafa Khokhar at mustafa@piemapping.com
portuesig (2015-09-30 14:33:17+00:00): cancellate le modifiche da me apportate 
grazie
datendelphin (2017-06-17 18:34:51+00:00): Hallo marbui

Wieso hast du hier ein access=no eingefügt? Das ist doch nur ein Auto und Töff Verbot?
olehz (2016-06-22 22:05:27+00:00): навіщо landuse=residential вилучати?
Hjart (2015-09-30 19:13:24+00:00): Var det meningen at det her skulle være en cykelrute? Det er i øvrigt ikke så heldigt lavet det her, så vi bliver nødt til at lave det om.
Hjart (2015-10-02 07:28:33+00:00): Hej
Jeg har reverteret dette rettesæt da veje ikke må overlappe andre veje.

Hvis du ønsker hjælp kan du henvende dig enten til mig eller på vores postliste http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
Vid the Kid (2015-10-31 01:21:24+00:00): There are no "Future I-73" signs in Ohio. There won't be any time soon, if ever.  The State of Ohio hasn't had any interest in building I-73 in about twenty years.  Therefore, adding "FUT I-73" to all the ref tags along the route is not appropriate.  (Furthermore, it was not planned to go through downtown Columbus or Portsmouth as your edits indicate.)