piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-20 12:22:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1733483834/history has shop = bathroom that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=bathroom ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it shop=bathroom_furnishing ? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bathroom%20furnishing ) Is it maybe public toilet/shower marked as a shop?
nicke (2024-05-21 09:06:17+00:00): Gosh - that was 12 years ago!  Yes, it would have been a bathroom furnishing shop.  But there's a strong probability it's not there anymore.  I don't live here now, so can't check.
Should I change the tag but add a fixme requesting a re-survey?
GerdP (2015-11-02 11:03:43+00:00): please review
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12068267

Bing shows a nice way close to it.
Was that build after you tagged it 
highway=x-residential or is Bing out-dated now?
gormur (2015-11-02 16:19:28+00:00): No idea. Fixed it now. Just fix it if you find more.
DUGA (2021-01-21 23:16:05+00:00): Please do not add unmarked foot path across railroad. It is very dangerous! I've deleted that segment you added near 40.50166, -78.40996. 

Moreover, the no trespassing sign has been there for years!
开始、坚持 (2015-04-28 13:30:14+00:00): 龙锦超市
user_21215681 (2024-03-18 07:12:15+00:00): ここはもう閉業していますよ
Pierce (2018-12-22 02:29:06+00:00): Hey there, Is this park legitimately called "park"? Do you have a source for this?
VictorIE (2025-04-12 02:09:39+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161464441

Is this the actual hospice or is it a nursing home attached to the hospice?

healthcare=hospice

-v-

amenity=social_facility
social_facility=nursing_home
zarl (2016-05-16 10:11:36+00:00): Hi mawi42,

ich bin da grad über einen älteren Edit von dir gestossen: bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37343143 verhindert das access=private, dass Fahrradfahrer durchfahren können. Ist das ein Privatweg als Zugang für die dortigen Häuser? dann wäre es wohl eher ein highway=service + service=driveway + motor_vehicle=private (und dann halt foot=yes + bicycle=yes dazu). Kennst du die Gegend genauer oder sollte man da nochmal vorbei gucken?

Gruss,
Zarl
eggie (2023-08-19 06:08:39+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marc__marc (2022-08-20 23:32:09+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/582274646
êtes vous certain que cet endroit ne mene nulle part ? j'ai plutot l'impression que c'est l'entrée d'une voie ou d'un parking souterrain ou couvert
Cordiaelement,
Marc
PT-53 (2019-11-15 10:49:41+00:00): Hallo Augustus,
Du hast diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161580516/history
neu eingezeichnet, als Teil dieser Relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2164109/history
Wenn eine Straße - zusätzlich zur Linie - als Fläche dargestellt werden soll, muß die Flächeselbst  mit den entspr. Merkmalen versehen werden (highway=* + area=yes). Eine Relation braucht es dazu nicht.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-24 11:46:48+00:00): Hallo Augustus,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-08 11:08:27+00:00): Fehlende Merkmale ergänzt
Graf Westerholt (2017-05-03 04:53:52+00:00): Was soll denn bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161590942 „access=designated“ bedeuten?
Nakaner (2015-03-21 13:59:28+00:00): Darf dieser Radweg wirklich nur von Radfahrern benutzt werden? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161628980/history Mit highway=cycleway ohne foot=designated/yes schließt du Fußgänger von der Nutzung des Weges aus!
supadomi (2015-03-21 14:04:37+00:00): Ich hab keine Ahnung - ist sehr lange her, daß ich da das letzte Mal lang gefahren bin. Ich habe aber damals (vor 3 Jahren) eh nur die Oberfläche nachgetragen! :-)
aceman444 (2019-03-28 06:41:47+00:00): Zdravim, je cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161639566 este stale uzavreta?
Napr. na https://poprad.dnes24.sk/dobre-spravy-pre-motoristov-pod-tatrami-v-plane-dalsich-sedem-usekov-ciest-271758 pisu, ze III/3107 v tomto useku idu opravovat. Viete to nejako overit?
trial (2019-03-14 13:33:27+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1723214397/history
place=hamlet ? N'est ce pas plutôt un quartier (place=neighbourhood) de Landerneau ?
ElliottPlack (2016-03-21 12:58:33+00:00): Note that some data in this changeset is under review for replacement: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Florida/Everglades_Agricultural_Area
GerdP (2015-11-23 05:27:46+00:00): Hallo!
Ich habe ein versehentliches surface=30 
ersertzt durch surface=asphalt,maxspeed=30:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35523063
OK?
DiahW IRM-ED (2021-06-08 04:59:31+00:00): Hi, @fagervan. I deleted this way (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/161706416) based on Maxar imagery. Thank you
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-29 04:21:15+00:00): skąd pomysł że w Polsce są angielskie nazwy linii autobusowych raczej niż po po polsku?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2165794/history
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-18 01:25:46+00:00): Added missing tree tag.
gendy54 (2021-01-01 22:36:35+00:00): Hello,

what's all this about? There are no tags associated.

Donat
wilda69 (2021-01-01 23:19:29+00:00): Hello Donat. This is a long time ago. Can you specify the "offending"  node. It looks like I used Merkaartor to simulate  a Garmin French Topo  plotting.
Dan
gendy54 (2021-01-01 23:55:51+00:00): Hello,

All nodes ;) For example, this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1737163841.
there are also some in other areas

Donat
wilda69 (2021-01-02 11:27:17+00:00): Thanks for pointing these out and have deleted the tags. Should not have happened ;) They were all unmapped until my walk there in 2012.
gendy54 (2021-01-02 12:39:47+00:00): No problem ;) If there are any in other places, I will remove them.

Donat
BeKri (2017-11-28 22:31:35+00:00): Servus Herr Spitzbergen,
eigentlich die gesamte Osterloh, außer Nummer 5
Diese Daten, die Du nicht gelöscht haben möchtest stehen jetzt bald 5 Jahren drin ..
bekommen die noch eine Hausnummer oder sollen das andere erledigen ?
Gruß derBeKri
Constable (2016-06-07 10:14:09+00:00): Ciao, noto che è appena stata aperta una nota in corrispondenza di questa sezione di strada con access=no (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161822252); l'accesso è veramente vietato a tutti indiscriminatamente?
Grazie
eggie (2020-09-04 12:31:01+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Flukx (2023-08-03 18:42:45+00:00): access=designated makes no sense (according to my understanding and according to the wiki). Also it looks unlikely to have a designated bike path in the middle of the forest on tracktype = grade5.
Would be good if someone could check what makes sense here.
If someone repairs it, please close the note I created at the point.
aharvey (2017-09-27 07:50:41+00:00): I know it's been 5 years but in line with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice I have a few issues with this.

1. "Unmarked Suggested Bike Route" if it's unmarked on the ground and only a suggested route according to the website you linked to, then it doesn't belong in OSM.

2. source=www.bikenorth.org.au. That map is copyright and OSM doesn't have permission to use. If this is not the case could you please point me to documentation of license/permission?

So based on this I'm starting to remove these where I've done a ground survey on Mapillary and can confirm there is no infrastructure or signposted routes.
efAston (2017-09-27 08:51:48+00:00): These suggested bike routes are useless anyway, they're actually worth avoiding (the NSW RTA hates cyclists and just wants them out of the way, they don't care whether the road is actually suitable for riding or not).

The problem with mapping cycle routes in NSW is that a lot of the cycle routes only exist on paper. There are shared paths on RTA official cycle maps which aren't sign-posted (for example, Pitt st and Argyle st Parramatta). This means the RTA cycle map is the only place where a legally defined cycle facility is declared, so as a cyclist, you're sometimes completely dependent on RTA cycle maps for where you are legally allowed to use the footpaths.

The suggested cycle routes on the other hand are useless, I'm pretty sure someone commented that these were to be removed a couple of years ago.
aharvey (2017-09-27 23:21:49+00:00): I concur, it's better for bicycle routing engines using OSM to favour actual infrastructure over routes because the presence of a route says nothing about the infrastructure present or it's suitability. That said, route actually marked still should have some weight since they can be easier to follow/navigate through due to the signage.

I'm finding a lot of routes are marked out eg. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.8071108611168&lng=151.20884280554696&z=17&panos=true&pKey=IFvDJTUmGb9mnMjrXe70Ag&focus=photo&x=0.5568584308144718&y=0.5578228919081532&zoom=1.6065056290744557

If it's marked as a shared path on the RMS map, but not on the ground, I would have thought you still can't ride on the footpath there...?

The only ways left in this relation now are mostly unconnected short segments so based on what you've said and what I'm seeing on the ground for the other ones I just removed, I'll remove the rest.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-08 12:17:19+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29213321/history has "layer=no isolated" on it.  It's not one of the usual layer tags (which are usually just numbers).  What does it mean?
SomeoneElse (2015-06-08 12:19:26+00:00): Also for info http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29213340/history and (in a different changeset) http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259211810/history
GUFSZ (2015-03-08 05:47:14+00:00): Wer Luftbilder verwendet hält natürlich in der Ortschaft einen Fußweg für einen Feldweg. Siehe Weg 145784370. Hoffentlich ist der Rest im Änderungssatz nicht ähnlich konfus.
Harry Wood (2016-11-11 16:50:57+00:00): In this changeset (4 years ago now!) it looks like you made a typo "network=Nation Rail" should be "network=National Rail".  Gregory was just spotting this. I think we should probably go ahead and fix that
kumarip (2019-02-27 03:47:29+00:00): "Hi Bahnpirat,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 162095148 classified as 'Service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'. 

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
kuhni74 (2026-07-05 07:20:16+00:00): ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162129876 die Wetterstation der GeoSphere Austria (vormals ZAMG)?
kuhni74 (2026-07-05 07:25:21+00:00): hm, eher nicht, die sollte so aussehen (?) https://www.kordon.wien/files/seiten/unsere_umwelt/wetter/wetterstation_jubilaeumswarte.jpg
kuhni74 (2026-07-05 07:26:48+00:00): könnte ein Geschwindigkeitsradar für Kfz sein?
kuhni74 (2026-07-05 10:58:09+00:00): die Wetterstation ist eh schon weiter westlich eingezeichnet
fkv (2020-11-12 15:40:56+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2375046 kamen Zweifel an der Richtigkeit des Gipfel-/Bergnamens "Tschogel" auf. Kannst du hier oder dort erklären, wo du den Namen her hast?
Nakaner (2015-04-19 13:24:05+00:00): Schreibt sich "Sport Campus" wirklich mit Deppenleerzeichen?
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-16 06:21:18+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1741358271 - czy nazwa ta odnosi się do tego całego zagajnika czy też jego fragmentu?
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-16 06:21:31+00:00): patrz też http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/435572
Slawek_n (2015-09-16 16:39:58+00:00): Według tego co wiem, to dotyczy całości. Nazwa pochodzi oczywiście od nazwiska właściciela.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:34:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1738685314/history has access:foot that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?
Yves Mahéo (2024-02-09 11:08:35+00:00): Maybe. My interpretation  is that  foot would rather be pertinent for a way,  whereas  access:foot would be more general, applied here to  a parking entrance.  Not sure.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-17 12:01:19+00:00): AFAIK foot is fine in both cases, though I would be happy to discuss it on tagging mailing list or community forum.

I have feeling that access: prefixes are some old idea that never gained support in general (unlike contact: prefixes that seem to be overall winning with prefixless versions)
Владимир К (2018-08-01 08:10:51+00:00): Добрый день!
Возник вопрос про https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162295143 
везде пишут, что екатерининская миля в волосском должна быть на южной окраине села, на выезде в Майорку. а тут посреди поля получается. ваше положение правильнее??
micha_k (2020-07-05 22:31:52+00:00): Was hat es mit dem Wanderweg "JKT 13 Buchenbach 8.6km" auf sich? Vor Ort existiert keinerlei Kennzeichnung, der Weg ist teilweise kaum auffindbar und ein Teil des Weges ist als "Wildruhezone" gesperrt.
Ergerzher (2016-03-21 20:23:04+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté un circuit vélo "circuit vélo Le verger" par cette groupe de modification.
Ayant trouvé aucune trace ni sur le terrain ni sur le site, je vous prie de bien vouloir préciser le type de ce circuit et votre source.
Merci
SomeoneElse (2022-05-21 10:54:44+00:00): Hello ospram,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 10 years ago.  On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1743317199 here.  We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source. 
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
Commodoortje (2015-11-01 07:56:03+00:00): Mag deze polygoon landuse=construction verwijdert worden, volgens mij is hier geen bestemmingsplan voor nieuwbouw.

Weg: 162458115
anderfo (2016-08-07 13:39:46+00:00): Er det helt bevisst at du har lagt inn mange stier med foot=yes, source=survey m.m., men uten å legge inn highway-tag?
vibrog (2016-08-07 18:21:36+00:00): Jepp.
foot=yes har jeg sluttet med. Det henger igjen fra den gang vi hadde
osmarender som et av de offisielle lagene på osm.org, som tolket path
avhengig av foot/bicycle/horse. Jeg burde egentlig ta en runde å
fjerne dette igjen, fordi det er misvisende i forhold til dagens
praksis.
Det er stier som jeg er i tvil om er relevante at er synlige på kart.
Jeg er for dårlig med å legge til note på dem av hensyn til andre (og meg selv).
Dersom du ser at de er medlemmer av relasjoner vil du straks se
nytteverdien av det enda bedre.
Husk også at jeg _aldri_ (nesten) sletter stier, men tagger det om.
F.eks. importerte stier fra N50, for å unngå reimport av noen som vil
"hjelpe" til. Da ligger den der med survey og "Ikke funnet", for
eksempel. Jeg følger samme prinsipp for stier som jeg har sett i andre
kilder, feks historiske kart, men funnet at har gått ut av bruk.
Problemet er at jeg ikke skriver det inn i source og note taggene på
passende måte... :(
anderfo (2016-08-07 19:35:56+00:00): Aha, skjønner. Hva med abandoned=highway eller noe i den gata? Da er det tydelig at det har vært en sti men at den ikke lenger er brukt. Så slipper folk å lure på om det er en vanlig forglemmelse (avglemt highway-tag e.l.).
eggie (2019-05-01 18:39:50+00:00): Heel lang geleden al een account bij OSM, maar nog geen welkomstmail zie ik... Bij deze  Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
whb (2017-01-02 22:09:59+00:00): Gibt es die Trafos hier wirklich?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1744514361
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1744514380
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1744514357
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1744514361
Alan (2015-09-05 22:27:41+00:00): It looks like you have a misspelling of "CFB Alert" as "CFB Akert". I also see the changeset comment says "altert". So I'm going to assume this is incorrect, and change the name. Let me know if I'm mistaken.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-11-27 11:15:01+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/475001
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-11-27 11:14:54+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/475001
Flap Slimy Outward (2026-01-12 06:00:17+00:00): Hello, where did you get thoese refs from? They aren't prefixed with anything, nor are they in any road route relations. Thanks!
Graf Westerholt (2017-01-28 17:22:19+00:00): Bei Eingängen zu Parkhäusern trägt man nicht die Parkhauseigenschaften in die Eingänge ein, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parking_entrance
Oskarst_ (2023-03-07 09:56:24+00:00): Finnes Path #162814383? Ser ikke spor etter den i hverken flyfoto eller heatmap.
olea (2023-03-08 09:02:32+00:00): Path #162814383 var stedvis vanskelig å finne da jeg tegnet den inn på OSM for noen år siden. Bergen og Hordaland turlag har arrangert Åsanes 7-fjellstur som blant annet har fulgt denne stien. Stien har altså vært i bruk av andre enn meg. Nå er det blitt mye enklere å følge den nye jubileumsstien i øst. Dermed er det fare for at Path #162814383 gror igjen. Det krever verifikasjon i felt for å se om stien fortsatt er der.
trial (2024-07-28 19:31:35+00:00): Bonjour, 
Une waterway=river a plusieurs mètres de large, je doute sauf résusgence que ce soit le cas de La Bondoire à sa "source".
*Martin* (2015-06-28 16:15:27+00:00): Trasa ocividne prekreslena z inej mapy. Osobne som presiel jej cast a vedie uplne inac :-(. Nutne cele osobne premapovat koli poruseniu licencie OSM.
*Martin* (2015-06-28 16:17:01+00:00): (konkretne: zlta znacka)
Constable (2017-12-05 16:01:44+00:00): hi there, why did you add this name if you were not sure about that? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1746838704 you were supposed to add a fixme tag instead of a supposed name that you're not sure about.
cheers
naoliv (2017-07-14 13:07:08+00:00): Pablo, de dónde sacaste los nombres de las calles?
pablopareja (2017-07-15 13:36:16+00:00): ¡Hola! Hace muchos años estuve de visita y fui anotando los nombres que pude. ¿Por? Si ves algún error, no dudes en corregirlo...
Peter Dobratz (2014-12-26 10:40:54+00:00): Here you've added a path with the tag ref=10163:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162937794

Where does that number come from?  I'm thinking of removing it.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-29 09:48:13+00:00): Updated dump station tagging
_torsten_ (2022-05-03 12:45:19+00:00): Hallo V3ltR, 
du hast im Mai 2012 den «Kuhberg» mit 405 m eingetragen. Wo hast du die Informationen zur Lage und zur Höhe her? 
Anhand von aktuellen Topokarten aus dem geoportal-th.de mit entsprechenden Höhenlinien würde ich die Kuppe weiter nach Südosten verorten und ihr eine Höhe von 255 m zuweisen.
Herzliche Grüße, Torsten.
frosm (2018-11-14 21:17:08+00:00): Hello,

about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130293722

what's our meaning of power=sub_station ?
according to the wiki, it's a depreacted tag with several meaning :
power=substation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsubstation
power=generator https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dgenerator
pipeline=substation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:pipeline%3Dsubstation

with the aerial imagery, it look like a power=substation but it's hard to guess it

Regards,
Marc
GerdP (2015-10-21 09:42:52+00:00): please review:
node 288529429 has tag 
highway=road_sign
which is rarely used.
I assume you meant traffic_sign=* ?
Derick Rethans (2015-10-21 10:02:11+00:00): I don't know - I just reverted some vandalism I believe! So feel free to change it to traffic_sign.
GerdP (2015-10-21 10:06:29+00:00): okay, sorry, I did not see that. No idea what traffic_sign that might be :-(
Derick Rethans (2015-10-21 10:25:44+00:00): The note says it's a road numbering sign with a "C" on it. Which technically should not be on a sign (only "A" and "B" roads). Because of that, they've added it. I would like to keep the data though. Perhaps traffic_sign=road_number ?
GerdP (2015-10-21 10:34:58+00:00): I found traffc_sign=highway_number is used 4 times, guess that is better, 
traffic_sign=road_number would also be new.
eggie (2023-04-28 18:27:20+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Nakaner (2015-04-02 16:42:56+00:00): Da mappt man ein bisschen Eisenbahn in Mannheim und dann stellt man fest, dass es einen Bahnhofsbunker in Mannheim-Käfertal gibt. :-) Meintest du das ernst oder war das ein Tippfehler?
Nakaner (2015-04-02 16:52:09+00:00): Sorry, ich glaube es dir jetzt. Ich habe mir jetzt mein Video aus dem Zug angesehen. Dafür weiß ich jetzt auch, dass es in Käfertal einen Fahrkartenautomaten gibt. Das wird wohl der unwirtschaftlichste Automat Deutschlands sein. :-)
Arma IRM-ED (2020-12-16 03:48:21+00:00): Hi, Dinh Van Tu. I have modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/163176765) based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 11:49:26+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4883400 ?

Bywasz może w okolicy?
RoboD (2025-08-01 09:19:36+00:00): Mogę być, na co konkret rócić uwagę?
oormilavinod (2017-06-30 06:46:56+00:00): hey WorstFixer https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/34.28039805411088/-119.1295033156813 the two adjacent waterbodies seem to have been encroached  due to the developmental activities. they are not visible on the imageries anymore. could you verify the same ?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-08-11 12:35:09+00:00): occhio al ref della rotonda!
GerdP (2015-11-03 19:43:44+00:00): please review 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1751162352
The tag highway=maintenance is only used here, what does it mean?
c2r (2015-11-03 19:52:28+00:00): I've absolutely no idea - I don't recall adding that (but it is over three years ago!);  maybe I split it from somewhere, or copied something with "r" accidentally from somewhere else where it's disappeared from since.....   I've no problem with the tag being removed if it is meaningless to everyone.
GerdP (2015-11-03 19:57:17+00:00): :-)
okay, I'll remove it
OSMDoudou (2021-01-09 10:34:01+00:00): Hello, I noticed the unusual sym=Waypoint on this chapel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1751630173. I was wondering what this tag means (I don't see documentation of it on the wiki, and it's not so frequent on taginfo) and what it served for. Can you shed light on this? Thank you.
Skyzzato (2021-04-27 11:03:27+00:00): Normale che ci siano due sentieri "Dosalt"?
SK53 (2017-08-28 19:21:51+00:00): Is the Cambridge RUFC ground in Newnham really operated by the University? My understanding is that the club owns the ground with the exception of a 5m ransom strip which is owned by Kings, but presumably leased to CRUFC. Certainly a few years ago there was no sign of the university when it ran into financial problems through overextending commitments.
marc__marc (2021-03-31 12:00:54+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1752875727
pourriez-vous le positionner au bon endroit ?
Cordialement,
Marc
foxandpotatoes (2021-05-03 20:59:11+00:00): Bonsoir,

Je reviens sur ton message. Je n'habite plus à Saint-Quentin et je ne peux donc préciser/confirmer cette localisation.

Pierre
eggie (2020-02-27 08:34:48+00:00): Jaren geleden al gestart met mappen, maar waarschijnlijk nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog. Wellicht je er je voordeel mee doen.
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Warin61 (2016-06-12 07:16:02+00:00): post office appears to be 1 km to the east now. node 1737974502