piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Niiepce (2022-08-12 15:58:22+00:00): Du hast hier den Tag place=square verwendet. Bist du der Meinung, dass dieser Ort hier der Definition des Tags (siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place=square?uselang=de) entspricht?
Außerdem hast du den Namen "Platz am Schiller-Denkmal" hinzugefügt. Handelt es sich hier um einen echten Namen oder um eine Beschreibung?
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Cucazer (2022-08-08 17:18:08+00:00): Uhm, Big Street? I doubt that it is a valid translation, seems more like Liela Street to me.
somix (2022-08-11 11:13:24+00:00): Translations added in changesets 124402638, 124403837, 124404155, 124535982, 124536134, 124536232, 124536365, 124536691, 124537094, 124537176, 124537229, 124537367, 124537436, 124568861, 124568757, 124568550, 124568647, 124046964 have been deleted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124713870
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124731460
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124732223
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124770941
Niiepce (2022-08-12 16:06:48+00:00): Du hast hier "street_cabinet=power_for_fountain_pump" zu einem Straßenschrank hinzugefügt. Dieser Tag wurde weltweit genau ein Mal (nämlich hier) verwendet. Wenn jeder sich willkürlich neue Werte für Tags ausdenkt, kann das Gemeinschaftsprojekt OpenStreetMap denke ich nicht gut funktionieren. Welchen Tag aus dieser Liste https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dstreet_cabinet#Kategorien_von_Stra%C3%9Fenschr%C3%A4nken würdest du vorschlagen, der am besten passt?
Und wenn man den Tag ändert, kann man auch sonst verloren gehende Informtionen mit anderen Tags dokumentieren. Zum Beispiel könnte sich der description Tag eignen.
mavl (2022-08-09 16:32:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124693034 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: transliteration - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124639538].
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Andre68 (2022-08-07 20:08:53+00:00): Okay, aber warum hast du Namen und Wikidata-Code gelöscht?
Ggf. auch den referenzierten Artikel bei Wikipedia als Attribut angeben...
Andre68 (2022-08-07 20:20:08+00:00): Sorry...
Hat sich geklärt...
Ist ja in der Relation...
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Austrianton (2022-08-12 17:54:46+00:00): Please keep change-sets local, to avoid spamming the history feed over large areas. If you edit small areas over a larger range, it is better to split the edit into multiple different local change-sets.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset

Happy future mapping
eggie (2022-12-30 09:36:38+00:00): Hoi   Ik heb bicycle=yes weer verwijderd van de boundary Kempenland-West


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124596571

Zo te zien een vergissing . Iets te veel geslecteerd.

MVG
eggie
Dolar (2023-01-06 13:49:03+00:00): Ai, slordig van mij idd. Bedankt, mvg dolar
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Swic (2023-02-14 17:30:00+00:00): Hey, can you tell why the path is labelled NO ACCESS ?
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
bxl-forever (2022-08-07 23:58:51+00:00): Hello,

FYI, bpost’s zone 1040 spans not just Etterbeek but also the City of Brussels, namely a large rectangle between Avenue des Arts/Kunstlaan, Loi/Wet, Belliard and Cinquantenaire/Jubelpark.

As we wrote on the wiki, there is no 1:1 relationship between postcodes and municipalities in the Brussels-Capital Region.  This map explains it more clearly: https://www.brussel.be/sites/default/files/bxl/Postcodes.pdf

I disagree with the changeset title because addr:postcode=1040 and addr:city=Bruxelles - Brussel is technically correct for this street.

That being said, in Belgium we generally only use addr:street and addr:housenumber, no more, because the rest can be obtained from parent relations or boundary zones.  Therefore, removing the postcode here is okay. 😉
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
eggie (2022-08-07 13:35:14+00:00): Jolly good!
tastrax (2022-08-10 07:52:29+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
mavl (2022-08-09 16:32:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124693034 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: transliteration - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124639538].
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
map per (2022-08-07 17:52:43+00:00): Hallo Toni,

ich würde nicht benutzungspflichtige Radwege weiterhin mit bicycle=designated taggen wenn ein für Radfahrer vorgesehener Weg (z.B. Teerstreifen) da ist.

Ob es eine Benutzungspflicht gibt würde ich an der Straße mit bicycle=use_sidepath / yes eintragen.

Viele Grüße
map per
ToniE (2022-08-08 16:16:12+00:00): Servus map per,

Konsens scheint zu sein, dass =designated die rechtliche Situation widergibt, nicht die physische.

bicyle=yes => ja, du darfst hier fahren,

bicycle=designated => du must hier fahren,

mit segregated=yes => abgetrennter, separater Teil für Rad.

=official (strenger als damals =designated, = blaue Schilder) hat sich nicht durchgesetzt

Gruß
Toni
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:58+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
ianlopez1115 (2022-08-07 15:20:25+00:00): Good catch, edit/s made in changeset 123939374 may have inadvertently retagged the speed limit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124599128
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
mavl (2022-08-09 16:32:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124693034 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: transliteration - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124639538].
Jrachi (2025-03-15 16:55:05+00:00): Ciao.
Non mi sembra abbia senso mettere disused=*
Se non esiste cancellala!

Ivo
micheleOSM3 (2025-03-16 17:45:00+00:00): Ho messo 4 anni fa' "fixme=relazione da eliminare", se vuoi eliminarla puoi farlo tu.
Jrachi (2025-03-16 17:49:15+00:00): Grazie.
In un cs successivo hai tolto il fixme per mettere quella serie di disused=*

Dovresti seguire le modifiche che fai, ma il mio è solo un suggerimento per il futuro.
Nessuno di noi nasce conoscendo tutti i tag o come usarli!

Faccio.

Ivo
micheleOSM3 (2025-03-16 18:34:05+00:00): Non sono il creatore della relation nè ho richiesto io di cancellarla, mi sono limitato a mettere un fixme perchè altri mappatori con maggiori informazioni di me potessero valutare se eliminarla o meno. Se tu ritieni sia giusto cancellarla, va bene, ma assumiti le tue responsabilità e non scaricarle su altri.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
literan (2022-08-08 20:41:47+00:00): как-то странно вы тропу отрисовали поверх пруда. Попробуйте еще раз, поточнее, эту удалю как то, что не может существовать
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
nevw (2022-08-07 21:56:53+00:00): Hi
The name tag is not used in this way.
The correct tag to use is addr:housenumber and addr:street .
… like this one  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847000377#map=18/-37.84323/144.95499
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
cytryn (2022-08-07 15:53:33+00:00): Cześć,
Dzięki za uzupełnienie mapy! Staraj się jednak unikać nazw, które są opisami, a nie nazwami własnymi.
Rzuć okiem na: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw%C4%85
O tym, że jest to przydrożny krzyż mówią już tagi historic=wayside_cross (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross) i nie należy tej informacji powtarzać w nazwie.
Poprawiłem w zestawie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124603067
Pozdrowienia
aceman444 (2022-08-23 20:06:56+00:00): Zdravim, trochu menej klamlive popisy sad zmien. Ziadnu presnost ste nevylepsili, naopak ste odstranili existujuce objekty.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
user_5359 (2022-08-08 13:34:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1084450303. What is the meaning of the tag apacity:persons = 50-100? Did you mean capacity?
What is the meaning of the leading * inside of different values (like name)?
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
mavl (2022-08-09 16:32:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124693034 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: transliteration - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124639538].
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-29 14:52:04+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129357826/history has surface:note = Trampelpfad that was added in this edit
surface:note=Trampelpfad ? Is it simply surface=dirt? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Ddirt

Would surface=dirt replace it fully?
Schaukelflieger (2025-12-03 13:50:47+00:00): Ich checked again. There is no real walking path, just a gap in a fence which people use to switch to the other road. In German its called "Trampelpfad", as the ground is grass, I changed surface=grass, added informal=yes and removed the note.
Niiepce (2022-08-12 16:13:45+00:00): Hier hast du den name Tag wieder zur Beschreibung von Objekten verwendet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben%E2%86%99
Könntest du diesen Fehler beheben und hier kurz antworten, damit ich weiß, dass du die Nachricht gelesen hast und die Korrektur vorgenommen hast. Danke
Niiepce (2022-08-12 16:16:20+00:00): Außerdem ist nicht die komplette Fläche ehemaliges Sportplatzgelände. Hier wäre es sinnvoll die Fläche aufzuteilen und korrekt zu attributieren. Könntest du diesen Fehler bitte auch beheben? Danke :)
user_9648254 (2022-08-12 17:31:08+00:00): Es ist offiziel immer noch das Sportplatzgelände der Uni.
Ich habe jetzt das ehemalige geloescht!
Niiepce (2022-08-15 15:20:00+00:00): Wenn die Fläche der Uni gehöhrt, dann gehöhrt das maximal in den operator Tag würde ich sagen und wenn da noch aktiv regelmäßig Sport betrieben wird, dann kann man es als leisure=pitch taggen.
Ich habe es jetzt dementsprechend verbessert und das Problem aus meinem zweiten Kommentar selbst behoben.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
user_5359 (2022-08-08 13:30:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1084455937 (one of three objects). What is the meaning of the following tags
Name = 4
area_km2 = 0.167655
building_1 = 3799.47
building_a = 0.0219258
building_c = 637.0
cluster_of = 112314.0
extrude = 0
grid_dist_ = 23.9434
large_buil = 131.0
percenta_1 = 13.0779
percentage = 20.5651
state = Plateau
tessellate = -1
visibility = -1
?
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:56+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:51+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
Filip009 (2022-09-19 11:43:38+00:00): Why is this whole way parking_space for disabled?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293416629
Władysław Komorek (2022-09-21 03:03:01+00:00): Poprawiono.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
user_5359 (2022-08-11 06:07:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/880100255/history. Is there any reason to add a character x to the key power?
SK53 (2022-08-11 08:10:09+00:00): Thanks for picking it up. I add the "x" which then allows me to divide a way in iD without it creating a relation. I should of course remove the "x" now, which I did do on the other half. As the building & the panel dont coincide it needs editing anyway.
martinst (2022-08-08 18:05:03+00:00): Du hast eine Linie culvert über den Bach gelegt, nicht den Bach an der Stelle unterbrochen.
Ausgebessert in Changeset: 124651856
frankystone (2022-08-08 18:23:30+00:00): Danke fürs fixen!
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
RicoElectrico (2022-08-07 22:37:55+00:00): Cześć, czy ten punkt widokowy:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9937576456

to nie jest przypadkiem duplikat istniejącej już wieży? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5973120370
RicoElectrico (2022-08-07 22:40:26+00:00): Dodatkowo wejścia na plażę już były oznaczone poprzez nazwy ścieżek do niej prowadzących.
cytryn (2022-08-08 06:41:48+00:00): Hej,
Cześć,
Staraj się unikać nazw, które są opisami obiektów (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazwa_pospolita), a nie ich nazwami własnymi (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazwa_w%C5%82asna).

Rzuć okiem na: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw%C4%85
O tym, że jest to ławka, czy tablica informacyjna mówią już odpowiednie tagi (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tagi) i nie należy tej informacji powtarzać w nazwie.

Poprawiłem w zestawie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124623142
Pozdrowienia
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Jakuje (2022-08-08 10:28:43+00:00): 1) Please, connect the roads together. non-connected stretch of roads are useless for routing.
abakus_uploader (2022-08-07 22:30:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:48+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
trigpoint (2022-08-07 18:06:25+00:00): Hi, the pub is already mapped.

I have removed the duplication.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2022-08-07 18:05:15+00:00): Hi, the cafe is already mapped.

I have removed the duplication.

Cheers Phil
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076