piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-04-08 05:19:56+00:00): Dag RHJM,  Maak svp gebruik van de bestaande adresnodes. 
Format postcode is zonder spatie.
Ik pas wat aan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-08 05:29:35+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht:  
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 12:10:55+00:00): Hi,

Gebäude die in der Wirklichkeit rechtwinklig sind bitte z.B. mit dem Shortcut "Q" auch in OSM rechtwinklig machen. Ansonsten sind eingezeichnete Gebäude immer krum und schief.

Grüße
Hauke
SomeoneElse (2021-04-11 16:17:22+00:00): Hello johnpan and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just to let you know - if you're mapping rectangular buildings, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927381661 , you can square the corners by selecting the building and pressing "q".

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
rthik007 (2021-04-09 03:25:50+00:00): Hi chunlinglee,
I have disconnected the buildings which are connected to residential road WAY: 902875884. Kindly refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102599128
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102510391
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-12 14:27:01+00:00): removidos
impiaaa (2021-04-08 14:30:48+00:00): Generally it's better to use access=private than to delete something just because it's "on private property"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
laznik (2021-04-08 06:52:46+00:00): name=cintorín treba vyhodit. Ten tag je vyhradeny na oficialne nazvy objektov
*Martin* (2021-04-08 07:48:24+00:00): tak veru. Pre gramatikov - do tagu name patri vlastne podstatne meno, nie vseobecne. Ak vlastne nema, tak nic.
ravali_78 (2021-04-12 12:13:31+00:00): Hi rexchang,
fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with residential  way 114782998 edits done by LeMarais8
Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102789002.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102510895
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
ToniE (2021-04-08 07:12:41+00:00): Hi Leaonardo,

do you have any idea, why changing/creating PTv2 routes in Nouakchott, Mauretania causes such a large Changeset-Area?

BR
Toni

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/MR/index.php
ToniE (2021-04-08 07:14:13+00:00): Found it and might be a mistake

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12549646

BR
Toni
ToniE (2021-04-08 07:15:05+00:00): And this one ... also a mistake?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12542548
Leonardo Gutierrez (2021-04-08 14:21:51+00:00): Thanks for the report, thanks to this I have been able to find an error in my changeset, I will revert it
Greg_Rose (2022-01-17 06:35:42+00:00): Hey Nate - where does EFRX tie down now if that stretch crossing 175th is disused?
fogey (2022-01-17 21:36:06+00:00): EFRX is no more. 109 is now MSN109.
Greg_Rose (2022-01-17 22:36:12+00:00): Thx Fogey. I didn't realize EFRX was done. That's depressing.
Natfoot (2022-01-19 02:25:45+00:00): yep Greg that is right. Been like this for more than a year now. also ownership changed hands and there should be a new operator.
skorasaurus (2021-04-08 17:50:38+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for your edits although the name of the school is not 'West Side High School'; it's formally named "Garrett Morgan School of Leadership & Innovation". 

(see https://www.clevelandmetroschools.org/GMSLI for additional information). If you change the name back to what it was, "Garrett Morgan School of Leadership & Innovation", I"d appreciate it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102511384
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Becky Candy (2021-04-21 13:06:23+00:00): Please remember to square the building by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q ,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102511498
Frans S (2021-05-08 14:22:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
You mapped more buildings than there are ! If there is no shadow it is mostly not a building. No need to map it. Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Best regards and keep mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 22:51:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103594144 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still somewhat problematical.
Frans S (2021-04-27 14:08:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here 
Please use the Maxar Premium imagery as requested. It might be possible that in IDeditor Bing is loading as default. Please change that.
Here are more buildings to be mapped.
Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:00:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119099 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4905 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Puxan (2021-04-08 12:32:02+00:00): Hi, I'm reviewing project 9024, I see you've started mapping, fine. You map buildings and squares well. Try to use BING images, which is what the instructions for this project say.               
Please,  watch these videos:  https://learnosm.org                      
Keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102511784
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 22:00:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103119099 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4905 .
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
CurlingMan13 (2022-04-06 08:06:04+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OSM!  I see you're a new user here.

Can you elaborate more in the changesets on what was done?  "Updates" is not useful and doesn't capture what was done.  I see you deleting a lot of nodes, but that isn't exactly updates.

Please refer to the following webpage for better Changeset Comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 22:27:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103366307 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comments.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 10:59:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103628042 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads, farm tracks to fields as unclassified) are still problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 10:59:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103628042 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads, farm tracks to fields as unclassified) are still problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 10:59:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103628042 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads, farm tracks to fields as unclassified) are still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 10:59:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103628042 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads, farm tracks to fields as unclassified) are still problematic.
user_5359 (2021-04-09 14:37:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/226798073/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 10:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103628042 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads, farm tracks to fields as unclassified) are still problematic.
EdLoach (2021-04-08 12:11:15+00:00): I'm going to revert this as it is adding trunk roads where there aren't any.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 16:24:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103581212, 103579797 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
ravali_78 (2021-04-14 13:50:24+00:00): Hi joanjhu,
Fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with residential at node 8604476617,kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102934496.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102513000
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 16:24:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103581212, 103579797 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
user_5359 (2021-04-09 14:37:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/226798073/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
Baraka Jungwa (2024-03-06 12:56:41+00:00): You have made poor mapping of the area. Buildings are not square and not of proper size. Do not make any changesets of such kind without proper mapping training
Greg_Rose (2022-01-20 08:24:17+00:00): Heya - you probably already know this, since this change is 10 months old... but Forest Service Roads shouldn't be tagged as "service roads". Unclassified or track would be more appropriate, depending on usage.
Most routers will not route to a service road, as they are commonly just used for driveways, parking lots and private industrial ways. 
If someone else already let you know, please ignore me! Cheers!
Greg
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-30 23:42:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103938695 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 16:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103581212, 103579797 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-30 23:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103938695 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
Frans S (2021-05-08 12:58:46+00:00): Hello.s Thanks for mapping here.
Please square each rectangular building when you mapped it.
When you map a road, please do not forget to tag it like highway=path f.e.
Best regards and keep mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 16:24:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103581212, 103579797 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103663230 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still problematic.
Adam_Piszczek (2021-10-14 22:22:41+00:00): A ta rudera to toaleta 😀
pan_borsuk (2021-10-18 21:58:39+00:00): zza czasów peerelu toalety żałobny rapsod ... xD :-P

pamiętasz Adamie jak na tym.. MOPie tętniło życie ?
Adam_Piszczek (2022-01-07 21:15:43+00:00): 795838285, wersja 3 jest do usunięcia wprowadza w błąd.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 11:58:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104393216 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103102838, 103104274 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted several times previously and even the most recent edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4925 etc.
stephankn (2021-06-30 07:18:41+00:00): there are only fields. Not residential. way 927422745