piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-07-20 10:20:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-07-19 11:05:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88197649 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some odd road class changes in Ireland following a complaint to the DWG.
amnmalik (2022-05-31 17:18:29+00:00): Pangat La is not on a saddle
Peter Van Geit (2022-06-02 06:58:51+00:00): Some passes are high points as the trail goes across a ridgeline. This one is from Olizane maps.
amnmalik (2022-06-02 09:21:18+00:00): Could be, yes, but to be consistent, they should be on the saddle, right? Also, olizane could be wrong, therefore makes sense to map only passes that indeed were crossed by the mapper....
Peter Van Geit (2022-06-02 10:26:29+00:00): A mountain pass is mostly - but not necessarily - a saddle Aman. I ve crossed passes which are just high points along ridgelines not corresponding to actual saddles. In this particular case it's probably a way around a steep gorge in the valley below. I crossed several of these especially in Ladakh/Zanskar region
Peter Van Geit (2022-06-02 10:29:37+00:00): I have mapped all named (Survey, Olizane) passes in OSM (2500+). Please do not remove these as they are my central repository / reference to plan my ongoing journeys, exploring Survey trails across the same
amnmalik (2022-06-02 10:41:03+00:00): I think it would be better if you download these passes as KML or GPX file and use them offline later and not enter them in OSM. OSM needs to be repo of actual passes or places.
the-asca (2021-01-04 21:06:33+00:00): Hallo,
der Name "Stieglitzsteg" war zuvor schon in OSM vorhanden als "official_name". Den Tag "name" zu befüllen, beißt sich, wenn bereits "noname" gesetzt ist.
Ich habe vorläufig den "name" daher wieder entfernt, aber auch das Ganze mal im OSM-Forum zur Diskussion gestellt:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71611

Gruß,
 asca
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-26 10:18:37+00:00): Hello!

You used
network=NWN
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11222442/history

Have you maybe meant
network=nwn
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
eggie (2020-07-14 17:03:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


MVG,
Eggie
Jos den Hollander (2020-07-14 21:43:35+00:00): Ik zie nog steeds AV ‘65 staan? Volgens mij had ik dat aangepast? Wanneer verandert dat?
eggie (2020-07-14 21:58:59+00:00): John... de rendering ligt er grotendeels uit in de standaardkaart. (iets te druk voor de servers) Je kunt het beste even deze layer gebruiken om het effect te zien.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87985936#map=19/51.51878/3.88880&layers=H

Of heel veel geduld hebben   :)
Wanneer de rendering het wel doet helpt ctrl-F5 ook vaak. (Cache leegmaken) 
mapse,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-14 22:01:57+00:00): De Duitse mapnik doet het iets sneller, maar ook niet denderend.
https://www.openstreetmap.de/karte.html?zoom=18&lat=51.51873&lon=3.88899&layers=B000
eggie (2020-07-14 22:04:17+00:00): ctrl=F5 even op verschillende zoomniveaus toepassen. Dat help in ieder geval nu.
Je mutaties zie ik gewoon.
eggie (2020-07-14 22:06:14+00:00): .. en uiteraard Jos en niet John  :)
Mapse verder
eggie
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-07-14 18:45:03+00:00): Hallo Sieda,
hat der Fleischer Di-Fr tatsächlich nur 15:00-18:00 geöffnet? Bei 7:00-13:00 Uhr und 15:00-18:00 Uhr müsste ein Komma zwischen die Werte (statt Semikolon).
Außerdem bitte die englischen Abkürzung (Di->Tu) verwenden.
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Frans S (2020-07-21 08:47:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
kapazao (2020-07-15 06:45:01+00:00): Hello, wikipedia and wikidata tags about a route should be used in the relation and not in each way.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87986137
Hartz Beltza (2020-07-16 11:42:04+00:00): I didn't know. Thank you
Sometimes we have very short routes in Navarre like this one NA-7188.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87986137#map=17/42.77489/-2.12016
Should we create a relation for this?
For the long ones, I understand
user_5359 (2020-07-17 03:53:42+00:00): Hello! The standard key for alternative name is alt_name (lowercase and with underscore instead space). I have correct this error.
eggie (2020-07-14 17:05:37+00:00): De geografische naam zal niet Voormalige hondenrenbaan zijn. Beter description= gebruiken.
Kijk je nog even?
Wanneer Hondenrenbaan echt de naam was kun je ook old_name = gebruiken.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-14 19:58:13+00:00): description = toegevoegd ipv name=
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-07-14 18:40:03+00:00): Moin Sieda,
ich denke es macht wenig Sinn die Adress-Daten von den Nodes auf die Gebäude-ways zu verschieben, da in Bad Fallingbostel die Adressen größtenteils als nodes erfasst sind. Für ein einheitliches Adress-Mapping sollte man wenn schon alle Adressen als nodes mappen.
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Joseph E (2020-10-11 05:37:40+00:00): Hi, I notice that you added the tag waterway=tidal_channel to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826215274 - but that tag is for tidal creeks or inlets next to the sea. Perhaps this is really part of the lake?
ElliottPlack (2020-07-22 01:16:35+00:00): This is awesome! I want to see it in person. I wonder if it might look better to add the mural as a point rather than on the line. Or maybe have both?
eaper (2020-07-22 01:54:55+00:00): The mural is centered on this now-closed road segment. The Pimlico Community Triangle consists of this segment, the island, and some extra (but I did not do a proper survey).
ElliottPlack (2020-07-22 01:56:11+00:00): We could probably set this to a pedestrian street or Living street then. Maybe add bollards if they exist
Frans S (2020-07-21 09:08:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
PT-53 (2020-08-24 05:30:03+00:00): Hallo PASTA777,
Du hast an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815707844/history
das Merkmal
construction=footway
ergänzt. Im OSM-Inspector wird nun ein Hinweis "nonop_confusion_on_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.48775&lat=48.57326&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways

Für längerfristige Sperrungen wegen einer Baustelle wird üblicherweise die Merkmalkombination
highway=construction + construction=*
verwendet.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-06 08:19:00+00:00): Hallo PASTA777, 
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-20 07:45:19+00:00): Hallo PASTA777, 
Du hast zwischenzeitlich das Merkmal
construction=footway
abgeändert in
construction=path
Das Merkmal
highway=path
ist aber weiterhin unverändert. Das paßt so nicht. Richtig wäre die Merkmal-Kombination
highway=construction +
construction=path

Bitte schau Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-27 06:58:34+00:00): Hallo PASTA777,
Du hast zwischenzeitlich das Merkmal
construction=footway
abgeändert in
construction=path
Das Merkmal
highway=path
ist aber weiterhin unverändert. Das paßt so nicht. Richtig wäre die Merkmal-Kombination
highway=construction +
construction=path

Bitte schau Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-10-04 09:52:02+00:00): Hallo PASTA777,
Bitte schau Dir das nochmal an.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-10-11 08:07:11+00:00): Hallo PASTA777,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an oder soll ich eine Sperre gegen Dich beantragen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-11-08 07:48:58+00:00): erledigt. Danke
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-29 13:19:36+00:00): Please, stop making such comments suggesting that you have some kind of power or right to decide what is the correct tagging.

OSM is not project where one person rules.

Note that in this specific case (trunk tagging) it appears that community of OSM editors have a different opinion how highway=trunk should be tagged (see talk-us mailing list discussion for an example)
kayle (2020-07-23 10:49:31+00:00): Zdravím to note= je nejaký identifikátor z registra adries?
Dodko (2020-07-23 11:16:45+00:00): Je to identifikátor adresy https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2015/125/20150701#paragraf-2.odsek-5
Pýtal som sa na fóre kam to dať, ale bez odpovede, tak som to dal do note. Naposledy som dával do ref:minvskaddress.
Ak by sa dalo hromadne presunúť z note do ref.
Dodko (2020-07-23 11:19:08+00:00): Tretia položka z menu vyhľadá podľa identifikátora adresy.
https://portal.minv.sk/wps/portal/domov/com.ness.ra/com.ness.ra_/
kayle (2020-07-23 11:57:31+00:00): Viem že sa nejaké adresy sa prejednávali, ale toto si presne nevybavujem.
Note nie je podľa mňa na to vhodné, ale to ref:minvskaddress vyzerá lepšie.
Občas treba asi viac krát položiť otázku, napr. ja sa snažím čítať všetko, ale často len tak narýchlo, tak mi to dôležité môže ujsť :(
Lebo bolo by vhodné to "zjednotiť", aby sa to spomenulo aj v https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:MinvSKAddress pre prípadné ďalšie updaty.
Dodko (2020-07-23 16:14:51+00:00): Opravil som note, aj pre Plešivec a Rožňavu.
kayle (2020-07-24 04:07:13+00:00): ďakujem
Dodko (2020-07-26 22:31:38+00:00): Pozerám české adresy https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:R%C3%9AIAN
tak budem používať ref:minvskaddress:addr (namiesto ref:minvskaddress) aby bolo jasné, že je to adresný bod k adrese.
Ak by som adresu pridával priamo do budovy a nie ako samostatný bod.
Reeniz (2020-07-14 16:41:20+00:00): "Camino Lirano" era el nombre correcto. Si no conoce los nombre. No los cambie. Si hay otro nombre municipal con el que se conoce el camino agregue el nombre de vialidad en official_name=*
Reeniz (2020-07-14 16:41:58+00:00): Tambien conocido como "El Lirano"
trigeo (2020-07-15 18:03:48+00:00): Thank you for your feedback I will make the requested changes.
Reeniz (2020-07-15 18:51:24+00:00): ur welcome. gl cya m8
trigpoint (2020-07-14 17:03:25+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Please could you explain what you mean by WCBC Original Map. do you have permission to copy from it?

Also the tags you have used are rather confusing, is it access=permissive or foot=yes. Assuming that this is a PROW then access=permissive would be very wrong.

Cheers Phil
!bm (2020-11-11 11:40:47+00:00): Hallo bomi77,

statt Löschen eines leerstehenden Geschäftslokals u.a. POI ist es in den allermeisten Fällen besser, disused:* zu setzen, s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused: (beachte generell  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix )

Der Grund ist ganz einfach, dass die Chronik erhalten werden soll:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Im konkreten Fall wurde wieder eröffnet – entsprechend geändert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93923992

--besteGrüße!bm
bomi77 (2020-11-12 07:55:53+00:00): Sorry, danke für den HInweis.
user_5359 (2020-07-14 17:05:56+00:00): Hello! Please use addr:subdistrict instead of add:subdistrict. I will correct this error.
mueschel (2020-07-15 11:10:56+00:00): Something went wrong with this import:

- all nodes are imported twice
- all nodes don't have valid tags (despite a name)
- I can't find the required documentation and discussion of the import.

Please check & fix this.
rab (2020-07-15 12:43:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7714327279
Position is also wrong.
Please fix
Øukasz (2020-07-23 07:26:07+00:00): Hi Maria L,

I also have concerns about this import.

It's rather disappointing that work done for UNHCR and CartONG project and described as 'standardisation' is of so questionable quality. 

Looking at the size of this import I'm assuming you will not be able to fix all the mistakes, so I would request reverting the changset, cleaning the input data, applying proper tags (including https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drefugee_site) and attempting adding the data again, while respecting proper process and ideally in smaller changesets that can be audited. 

Thank you.
user_5359 (2020-07-23 07:58:28+00:00): I think it is a pity that no further attempt was made to clarify this, but due to lack of response I reverted the change set.
Je pense qu'il est dommage qu'aucune autre tentative n'ait été faite pour clarifier ce point, mais par manque de réponse, j'ai renvoyé le dossier.
Øukasz (2020-07-24 08:59:37+00:00): Hello again user_5359,

I was wondering if you noticed if any of the features created by the two import changesets were later modified (I believe some may have been), and if yes - were they deleted through your revert?

Thank you
mueschel (2020-07-25 10:17:10+00:00): I found 5 remaining nodes that were modified and removed them as well right now.
DD1GJ (2020-07-15 06:34:51+00:00): revert 87989529 87988624 vandalism
blackboxlogic (2020-07-14 17:40:04+00:00): What is "big chief"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87988800
afish430 (2020-07-14 20:43:06+00:00): just the name of a cabin
limes11 (2020-07-14 20:49:06+00:00): Hi, 

die ganzen Zugangswerte sind überflüssig, auf hw=service gilt per default foot=yes, bicycle=yes, etc. Nur auf hw=track sollte man den Zugang für motor_vehicle mappen, da dies nicht klar ist. 

Gruss, Limes
abrensch (2020-07-22 08:16:19+00:00): Hallo Lokalfürst,

warum ist das denn hier jetzt Einbahnstrasse?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135294182
Lokalfuerst (2020-09-19 13:54:36+00:00): Hallo,
es gab meinerseits keinen Grund, hier eine Einbahnstrasse zu setzen...
war eine Fehlbedienung.
eggie (2020-07-14 17:37:23+00:00): Beste Groenweert,
De landuse = industrial is nu verkleefd met de highway. 
Hier kun je dat zien. 
Zal het even losmaken.. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87989321
MVG,
Eggie
samhandler (2020-07-15 02:15:27+00:00): This area should not be tagged as "building=yes", since it is not (as far as I know) a single building. Something like "landuse=retail" would be more appropriate.
DD1GJ (2020-07-15 06:35:00+00:00): revert 87989529 87988624 vandalism
karson_ (2020-07-15 00:41:12+00:00): It's perfectly fine to map driveways. The driveways you are deleting are already marked as access=private. They are rendered differently on the map and routing apps won't use ways marked private.
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-08-08 20:05:01+00:00): Rîul dat se numește „Bîc”. Numele proprii (în cazul dat hidronimele) sunt inflexibile și nu neapărat trebuie să se formează după normele gramaticale.
Vezi:
1. https://static.locals.md/2014/06/riul-bic.jpg
2. https://ibb.co/JtJ0wQj
3. https://ibb.co/N7ptQLs
4. https://ibb.co/dM4qBn7
aweech (2020-07-14 18:37:59+00:00): Hi, I see that you requested review of this edit. In it you attached a residential road to the nearby landuse and tagged the surface as asphalt. Connecting roads to landuse is not recommended. Also when reviewing TIGER data, one should check if there should be a name on the road. If you had checked the "TIGER Roads 2019" option in the editor, you would have seen that the name of the road is West 4450 North. Adding the correct surface tag to the road was good.
Thank you for your contributions, and happy mapping!
muralito (2020-07-14 19:34:37+00:00): El "international" no iria en aerodrome_type?
Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:aerodrome:type
Hernan (2020-07-14 20:14:50+00:00): Si, según eso si. Pasa que esto fue solo un experimento para ver porque motivo en la mueva capa ÖPNVKarte aparecia solo el aeropuerto de Rosario Y esa era la diferencia, por eso se la agregue. Ahora lo voy a cambiar por la forma correcta. Saludos!
muralito (2020-07-14 22:14:32+00:00): Capaz que tenes razon, y es mejor usar los dos. El de MVD hace tiempo esta etiquetado con el aerodrome_type y no se muestra en esa capa.
Hernan (2020-07-14 23:03:15+00:00): La verdad que no se. aerodrome parece no estar en uso https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Aerodrome asi que tampoco es la idea de mapear para el mapa...  No hice nunca aeropuertos, debo haber marcado un par de pistas hace años. Solo entre a ver esa capa nueva y vi esa diferencia, asi que probe. Voy a mirar los europeos a ver que onda, porque aparecen y los de aca no
muralito (2020-07-14 23:14:44+00:00): Mapear para el render no, pero el mapa tiene que ser coherente, y creo que esta fallando en algo. Destaca este que es bien chico y eetiquetado aerodrome=regional
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7737177
Hernan (2020-07-14 23:25:32+00:00): Y bueno, empecemos a usarla. Lo ideal sería escribirle a quienes hacen la capa, pero la verdad estoy con otra cosas. Lo bueno es que si lo estandarizados, después cambiar todo junto es más fácil... :)
muralito (2020-07-14 23:29:27+00:00): hace un tiempo tuve una conversacion con un colaborador, que el tema de aeropuerto internacional, es porque recibe vuelos internacionales. no por la importancia.
 
Yo las llamaria internacional a los que tienen vuelos de linea regulares internacionales. Los otros son casi siempre aeropuertos chicos para vuelos privados. Carecen de importancia en un mapa general. Por decir algo, solo Ezeiza y Aeropoarque deberian tenet destaque en ese mapa. Otros aeropuertos pueden ser internacionales porque tienen servicio de migracion y aduana, pero algunos hasta hay que coordinar que haya personal al arribo o salida. 

En definitiva, el "Internacional" de la clasificacion no tendria que asociarse al nombre "Aeropuerto Internacional de X", ni a que lleguen/salgan vuelos internacionales. Eso creo que es lo que no está claro ni en la doc, y ni siquiera se si hay consenso.

El Aeropuerto de Pelotas (PET) creo que es un ejemplo, pero con esto de que no hay vuelos normales el flightradar ya no me muestra nada.
Hernan (2020-07-14 23:39:26+00:00): Estoy de acuerdo que solo deberían ser los que reciben vuelos internacionales, pero en Argentina hay más que reciben vuelos internacionales. En este momento en el grupo transporte estamos viendo de confirmar con certeza cuáles son o cuáles siguen siendolo
AgusQui (2020-07-15 00:15:54+00:00): Nunca le había prestado atención a estos tags. Mirando las discusiones en la wiki de aerodrome:type veo que no está muy definido, incluso en 2019 hubo otra propuesta para aerodrome. Yo diría usar aerodrome:type para todos y agregar aerodrome=international a los más importantes
Frans S (2020-07-23 10:40:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-07-19 11:05:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 88197649 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some odd road class changes in Ireland following a complaint to the DWG.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-23 00:29:53+00:00): why 4 novo silgo?
braty (2020-07-15 00:55:42+00:00): May you please put the address from the entrance node also also at the building way?
Rogoyski (2021-01-01 19:30:56+00:00): Proszę nie oznaczać na ślepo skrzyżowań chodników i dróg rowerowych z rowami jako bród (ford=yes), np .https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7714475032. Brody są oczywiście dużą rzadkością, a w tym miejscu jednoznacznie widać, że DDR przechodzi nad rowem.
Aleks-Berlin (2021-02-24 11:39:27+00:00): Hi Adam,
you put "name"="\" into
www.openstreetmap.org/way/5093738
Was this intended?
Thx, Alex
Adam Schneider (2021-02-24 16:59:37+00:00): No, that's a typo!
Aleks-Berlin (2021-02-24 19:40:28+00:00): What is the correct name? If unknown, I will remove the tag.