piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2015-02-24 01:19:32+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I hope you don't mind me mentioning this, but I just spotted that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325892833 doesn't seem to join the road at the southwest end.  If things join in real life it makes sense to join them in OSM too so that web-based routers and hand-held GPSs can direct traffic over the join.

One other thing that might be worth mentioning because you might think that it looks a bit odd - Lyonette Road here doesn't actually match the Bing imagery; it's offset to the south a bit.  The reason for this I suspect is that the imagery itself is offset slightly.  You can tell by looking at the underlying GPS traces for the road to the north layer in the editor.  If you nudge the imagery so that they line up you'll notice that Lyonette Road will too.

Anyway, as I said I hope that you don't mind me mentioning this - any questions please do ask.
Best Regards, Andy.
pnorman (2015-02-03 02:31:13+00:00): It looks like you've changed the link roads connecting to the motorway to secondary links. Normally these would be highway=motorway_link. You can read more at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
aaronsta (2015-02-03 04:28:33+00:00): Hi pnorman :)

I appreciate your comment and was wanting to test the rendering of residential_link and link road capping. This changeset has been redacted @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28581542
SomeoneElse (2015-02-09 23:24:59+00:00): Oops - I think that something's gone a bit wrong with the steps http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325885958/history - now they neither join the cycleway nor Bestwood Road (I'm guessing that in reality they connect both)?
Karcher333 (2015-02-10 19:34:39+00:00): Oops indeed, apologies for that. My first proper track edit from a survey so thanks for pointing it out. Despite all my reading and youtube videos it looks like I still did something wrong, not sure what yet! I need a little time to do a bit more reading then I'll fix it. Thanks for your help :)
franzelka (2015-05-02 08:15:39+00:00): Hi,
irgendwas lief hier schief. Man kann nun nicht mehr von der L 3003 auf die Hügelstrasse links abbiegen. Entweder die Abbiegebeschränkungen für Weg 141646262 müssen angepasst werden oder es muss eine kurze Linksabbiegerspur eingefügt.
Gruß Franzel
mueschel (2015-05-02 10:56:57+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Ich hatte eine ewig lange parallel laufende Abbiegerspur entfernt, die noch dazu bereits über Lanetagging erfasst war. Dabei hatte ich eine Abbiegebeschränkung übersehen. Jetzt kann wieder nach Lust und Laune abgebogen werden. Siehe changeset #30717923.
Jan
Hjart (2015-02-16 06:37:36+00:00): Er Bings billeder nyere end Geodatastyrelsens her?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-02-16 09:29:17+00:00): Nej, jeg tror at GDS er nyere. Har rettet.
Prot D (2015-02-27 20:37:44+00:00): Nazdar, v mapě jsi sem koukám přidal nějaké cesty, ale nejsou nijak označené. To měla být nějaká pěší cesta? A také to vede skrz budovu - tam je nějaký podchod nebo je to omyl? Díky!
cernyt (2015-02-28 19:38:51+00:00): Ahoj,

ja s upravou map terpve zacinam. Popravde, nevim jak jeste "oznacit"
cesty, ktere pridam.

Ano je to pesina za budovou (dlazdena cesta), budova lze prochazet, je
to videt treba tady.

https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=50.094986,14.451701&spn=0.000892,0.001396&t=h&z=20&layer=c&cbll=50.09502,14.451845&panoid=VcGg5bCmTA9MqtRrHRMF1g&cbp=12,25.37,,0,-9.51

ok, prolistuju manual, nez zacnu pridavat dalsi cesty
Prot D (2015-03-06 15:22:10+00:00): Ok, pokusil jsem se to tedy poopravit, jak si představuju, že to je :-) Případně se ozvi, jestli je to špatně. V editoru iD stačí po naklikání "cesty" ještě vlevo zvolit typ objektu - jestli je to silnice, potok atd., případně přidat další vlastnosti jako název, jestli jde o tunel...
cadsauxk (2015-07-18 17:47:15+00:00): Porque marcou os caminhos como ciclovias? 

Certamente dá para pedalar, mas eu classificaria mais como path, cicle=yes
Heitor M B Moraes (2015-07-19 11:20:21+00:00): Gerald, voce está certo.
Monitor (2015-02-16 10:20:12+00:00): Проверь, в этой правке много дублей объектов  http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?lang=ru&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch120=1&ch270=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=6&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=56.46265&lon=43.55728&zoom=17&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C120%2C160%2C191%2C195%2C196%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C285%2C294%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C20%2C60
fedorefr (2015-02-16 11:33:58+00:00): Андрей, спасибо, вроде бы поправил. Причина дублей - моя ошибка, повторная загрузка после ошибочной загрузки.
eggie (2018-12-15 15:32:19+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SK53 (2015-02-01 17:31:37+00:00): Wow, what a lot of nice extra data! Goes to show there is always something new to add.
philsands (2015-02-01 22:15:01+00:00): Thanks mate. Been meaning to add it for a while
Sorbus_x_kewensis (2015-05-07 15:14:05+00:00): Hi Pmailkeey,

There are several inaccuracies in this changeset:

There's no roundabout in Downe Village, the relations for the bus routes are now broken, and one way sections in the village centre are now broken. If you don't mind, I'd like to revert your changeset as the easiest way to put the errors right. I'm local to this area and can confirm the map before your edits to be more accurate. Many thanks, Rowan
pmailkeey (2015-05-07 21:46:16+00:00): I don't see a roundabout on the map. I see two segments of one-way which I presume were wrong and have corrected - none of the roads appear to be one-way - and it wouldn't make sense if they were due to lack of alternatives.
Hopefully I've got the bus route sorted now as well ?
SimonvdP (2015-02-05 21:17:16+00:00): er loopt een discussie in het forum (onder verdwenen erasmusbrug)  om de oude versie weer terug te zetten, er ontbreekt nu nog een fietspad
lyctkel (2023-11-26 11:01:08+00:00): Hi Sir Lancelot,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325943014 verwendet building = bing sat.
Ich nehme an, es war 
building=yes und source=Bing Maps Aerial gemeint.
Viele Grüße aus Holland,
lyctkel
Nakaner (2015-02-03 19:28:23+00:00): Für Öffnungszeiten gibt es einen "vorgeschriebene" Syntax. Bitte beachten und diesen Changeset korrigieren. Danke. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone
Nakaner (2015-04-12 14:53:55+00:00): Für welche Fahrtrichtung gilt dieses Signal. Bitte denke daran, auch die Fahrtrichtung zu taggen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3325858174/history
SomeoneElse (2015-02-01 20:26:01+00:00): This looks very much like a mechanical import.  Was it discussed anywhere beforehand (see http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for what's supposed to happen before an import).  Were any other parts of that procedure followed?

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of the OpenStreetMap data working group.
openseamapwreckimport (2015-02-01 21:01:40+00:00): We talked about that in the OpenSeaMap mailinglist. 
http://sourceforge.net/p/openseamap/mailman/message/33287408/
The last changeset was merely a test import of a small subset of the data. to see how it goes. Aparently not very great :-(.

The data itself is from NOAA, therefore it is in the public domain. 

What do you think should happen next?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-01 21:24:11+00:00): Re "What do you think should happen next?" I'd revert the import and "start at the top" again.  I'll assume that you've done "Step 1" of http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines.  Step 2 includes "Discuss your plan" - so I'd do that, in a more general forum other that one associated with a particular rendering such as OpenSeaMap.  I'd expect that people will ask about the licence (for example, you've got the data from NOAA, but was any of the data obtained by them from third parties?).  Among other things I'd also expect that you'd be asked how you know this data is accurate, how you'll update OSM when the NOAA source changes, and how you'll avoid duplication of data already in OSM.
pnorman (2015-02-01 23:45:07+00:00): As the import did none of the required consultation with the imports@ mailing list or the local lists, I'm going ahead and reverting it.
openseamapwreckimport (2015-02-02 06:12:03+00:00): Ok, fair enough, I' go on the imports mailing list as soon as I hear further information from NOAA.
stephan75 (2015-09-03 15:25:46+00:00): Hallo Belecker, in diesem changeset in Langeneicke und nebenan in Gesecke (siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28553722 ) hast du zu ganz vielen Gebäuden die Hausnummern mittels addr:housenumber=xx eingetragen. Leider fehlen aber zu ganz vielen Objekten noch die addr:-Daten zu der entsprechenden Straße ...

Könntest du diese Daten für die beiden Orte noch nachtragen? Das wäre super! 

Da du bei deinen Änderungen ja den JOSM-Editor benutzt hast, kann ich dir dazu den Mappaint-Stil "ColouredStreets" empfehlen, damit werden Straßen und die dazugehörenden Objekte mit addr: Daten farblich zusammen dargestellt ... siehe https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AStyles
MKnight (2015-02-01 19:39:12+00:00): +wheelchare/survey
MKnight (2015-02-01 19:39:30+00:00): chair...
0123456789 (2015-02-02 05:47:22+00:00): What were the names that you added here?
trigpoint (2015-02-02 15:48:10+00:00): It is name:kn. Must admit I have never seen that used in Leicester
trigpoint (2015-02-02 15:54:36+00:00): What is the source of this changeset, can you point at on the ground evidence?
indigomc (2015-02-02 17:42:54+00:00): They were thenames written in other languages / scripts
indigomc (2015-02-02 18:01:12+00:00): Sorry, what's that about on the ground evidence, trigpoint? Presumably this relates to Leicester.  The names are added so that a map can be created written in another language. What evidence do you need to write it in another script? They are just a transcription of the spoken name.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-03 17:46:04+00:00): Ethnologue (http://www.ethnologue.com/world) says that there are > 7000 languages in the world.  Taginfo (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=name) says that there are 44,000,000 names in OSM.  Clearly it makes no sense to have every name translated or "soundalike transliterated" into 7,000 other languages - OSM would soon become nothing more than a list of translations.  Some places (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/50046) really do have names that are different languages; some do not.  If you've just converted the "sound" of a word in one language to the same sound in another language, it's not worth storing it in OSM - do the translation externally and store it in your rendering (or whatever) database downstream from OSM.
FTA (2017-03-26 00:45:04+00:00): Hi there! It looks like you added a line with no tags a few years ago, so I went ahead and removed it. If you have any questions about mapping, don't hesitate to shout!
Best Wishes,
Ethan aka FTA
Smiljan_02 (2015-06-16 20:40:07+00:00): Hallo George,
Mapper patzi hat dir ja bereits zu einem anderne Änderungssatz einen Kommentar geschrieben http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28562436#map=11/51.9038/10.6464 , leider hast du darauf nicht geantwortet.
Ich hoffe du hast dich mit dem Taging von lanes zwischenzeitlich beschäftigt.

MfG

Senni
jptolosa (2016-03-19 21:42:50+00:00): Hello, here there is an opened boundary relation named Thondwe EPA: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/f7x
JohnDoe23 (2015-02-02 00:45:36+00:00): Ich hab mal ein paar Attribute der von dir erfassten Stromleitungen korrigiert. Freileitungen (z.B. [1]) werden mit power=minor_line erfasst: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power%3Dminor_line
Trafoturmstationen (z.B. [2]) nicht als Transformator sondern als power=substation: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:power%3Dsubstation#Beispiele

Gruß

[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325986868
[2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325986872
zarl (2016-08-27 10:16:45+00:00): Hi, die von dir eingetragene Relation 4550522 "Isartalbahn (ehem.)" war so eine Fantasie-Route, die habe ich jetzt etwas umgebaut. route=foot gibt es nicht, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route#Dokumentierte_Routentypen und der Verlauf über eine gesperrte Brücke kann natürlich auch nicht stimmen, dort ist auch nichts entsprechend ausgeschildert. Erweiterung zum Bhf Großhesselohe bitte erst, wenn das auch tatsächlich mal begeh- / befahrbar ist.

Siehe auch Definition "Eine Route ist eine vorgegebene und oft öffentlich ausgeschilderte Strecke, die über verschiedene Abschnitte führt und regelmäßig von Fahrzeugen oder Personen genutzt wird." hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route

Gruss,

Zarl
heilbron (2025-08-17 12:37:25+00:00): Hallo,
die Isartalbahn hat früher einmal über diese (schon lange) gesperrte Brücke geführt.
zarl (2015-02-08 22:09:32+00:00): Hallo rza31,

die Apotheke in der Talstrasse in Sasbachwalden müsste eigentlich "Hornisgrinde Apotheke" heissen, die ist hier aber als Kur-Apotheke eingetragen. Steht irgendwo an der Apotheke was von Kur-Apotheke? Online im Impressum steht "Hornisgrinde Apotheke Sasbachwalden".

Viele Grüsse,
Zarl
RicoZ (2015-03-03 23:13:40+00:00): Hi, you have accidentally deleted the coastline of Huahine Iti so I am reverting this changeset.

Don't hesitate to ask for help when editing and wish you better luck next time.
kuhni74 (2023-08-28 12:34:11+00:00): Wo kommt denn der Name "Roarnlacke" her? Müsste meines Erachtens "Boarnlacke" heißen.
kreuzschnabel (2020-05-01 09:12:39+00:00): Hi Martin, die beiden Abbiegebeschränkungen finde ich kontraproduktiv, da sie in dieser Form auch von Fahrradroutern beachtet werden. Das trifft sicher nicht zu. Man könnte zwar ein except=* reintaggen, aber da normaler KFZ-Verkehr ohnehin nicht über hw=track geroutet wird, würde ich die zwei TRs einfach weglassen.
ma-rt-in (2020-05-01 09:17:33+00:00): Hallo,
ja da gebe ich dir recht. Ich werde die TR´s selbst entfernen. Vor 5 Jahren war meine Auffassung noch eine andere.
Danke das du mich darauf aufmerksam gemacht hast.
vg
SomeoneElse (2015-02-03 21:56:15+00:00): Again, the source https://github.com/mapbox/map-feedback/issues/540 seems to be unreachable.  Could you explain?
andygol (2015-02-03 22:22:18+00:00): We had recieved feedback through the service https://www.mapbox.com/map-feedback/ that had description "5a doods lane market street Alnwick" and link for editing http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/55.412789097907826/-1.7077034711837766. 

You can't reach the source link because this is a private repo. Therefore, I tried to transfer information about edits in the description of a set of changes.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-03 22:36:07+00:00): Given that https://github.com/mapbox/map-feedback/issues/540 isn't accessible, perhaps it would be worth copying the full text of the feedback to the changeset comment (or if it's too long) to a changeset discussion?  Or perhaps, if the feeback issue definitely refers to something that needs fixing in OSM, transfer it to an OSM note so that everyone can see what was said and where, so that they can (perhaps with local knowledge) check what's been added.

In this case, for example, it's not clear to me that "5a doods lane market street Alnwick" means that the building that you've changed is 5a.  It's actually at the very end of Market Street, so it can't be 5a Market Street.  Doods Lane runs under the building so they're probably referring to an address on Doods Lane.  As to exactly what property it is, who knows?  Surely in this case it's better to leave an OSM note so that a local familiar with the area can check rather than just guessing remotely (in this case, almost certainly incorrectly).
SK53 (2015-02-20 08:58:18+00:00): I have removed the address tag as it is clearly incorrect. To do so I used FHRS Open Data to add addresses to the mapped POIs along Clayport and Market Streets. The addresses are in the 30s at the junction with Clayport Street. Furthermore a simple web search shows Cafe Delicious at 39 (but this data may not be admissable to OSM). I would suggest following a basic rule about adding things like addresses from notes or user reports, which is ensure that there is an independent piece of evidence to support the statement in the note. Also always be very cautious about using the placement of the note as a source of precise geolocation.
andygol (2015-02-20 18:15:30+00:00): @SK53 Thanks for your attention and help with this issue. I'll be add notes when I doubt about info from feedback.
lxbarth (2015-02-26 10:02:33+00:00): > which is ensure that there is an independent piece of evidence to support the statement in the note

Yeah, let's not add data to OSM that can't be independently verified.
emacsen (2015-02-02 14:27:57+00:00): Hi,

You're making a lot of road edits here... dozens of roads per changeset. Can you tell me what it is that you're actually modifying, and why?
Datin (2015-02-02 06:39:21+00:00): Litaňské náměstí - na první pohled se mi nějak nezdá jednosměrka na vjezdu na  "nádvoří". Nešlo by pak vyjet ven :-)
Roulin205 (2015-02-02 16:47:59+00:00): Do tohoto jsem nezasahoval. Chyby jsem si nevšiml. Ale už je to opraveno ;-)
woodpeck (2015-02-02 09:48:59+00:00): This appears to be an un-discussed and faulty import. The nodes have no tags and are not members of any ways. There is no mention of this import on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue. Buildings seem to have been cut off geometrically at the boundaries. Do not continue this building import.
ftrebien (2015-02-22 13:57:49+00:00): Belém Velho não é um hamlet/lugarejo, o correto é como estava antes - suburb/subúrbio. Por que a mudança?
ftrebien (2015-02-22 14:01:02+00:00): Além disso, não é correto mapear a área construída com landuse=residential para representar a área construída, a menos que ela tenha uma designação especial, um nome próprio, como é o caso dos condomínios e das vilas. A comunidade brasileira já discutiu isso algumas vezes na lista talk-br. É por isso que não mapeamos toda a zona urbana dessa forma.
smaprs (2015-02-22 14:39:58+00:00): Como assim? Eu não me lembro de ter mudado para hamlet, pelo que vejo tá assim desde o início:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/416766939/history. Quanto ao detalhe sobre landuse=residencial não sabia. Por outro lado pode não ter sido bem exatamente de acordo com algo discutido no talk-br, mas não tenho visto que mapear assim seja fundamentalmente errado. Se é, seria conveniente acrescentar nos how-to do BR? Mas se achares alguma coisa errada, pode mudar, sem problema.
ftrebien (2015-02-23 22:09:09+00:00): Oh, tens razão, me desculpe. Eu me confundi enquanto preparava os limites dos bairros pra importação (passei horas demais lendo legislação municipal).

Quanto a landuse=residential, eu concordava com você até começar a discutir com a comunidade internacional sobre uma possível importação dos perímetros urbanos no Brasil (informação que o IBGE oferece há anos). Landuse=residential, landuse=commercial, landuse=industrial, etc. são para zonas "designadas" pelo planejamento urbano (ou para propriedades privadas que tenham essa função). Landuse=residential é então pra ser usado em regiões exclusivamente residenciais (como em Brasília, por exemplo). Belém Velho possui comércio misturado com as residências, então por definição não poderia. Usar landuse=residential pras vilas é em boa parte "licença poética", mas foi combinada com a comunidade brasileira (já que não vislumbramos nada melhor) com respaldo na comunidade internacional (há casos parecidos em outros países), então tá ok.

Como minhas prioridades são outras, não pretendo remover o seu desenho nem aprofundar o debate diretamente contigo, mas sugiro que você investigue o assunto (tem discussões sobre isso no histórico da talk-br) pra não gastar tempo com algo que terá que ser transformado manualmente ou (no pior caso) removido. Sei que o HOT tem essa prática (já vi eles fazendo em outro lugar), mas eles têm certas práticas incompatíveis com a comunidade do OSM mesmo.
ftrebien (2015-02-23 22:28:10+00:00): Na verdade, o próprio wiki diz isso: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:landuse#Cities_and_landuse
Skippern (2015-02-02 12:43:56+00:00): No que formato voce tem dados do IJSN? Tem tempo procurei dados úteis para rastrear, mas somente achando dados em PDF ou JPG/PNG mapas temáticas. Como estes dados e PD seria interessante compartilhar os fontes com o comunidade.
LucFreitas (2015-02-02 14:28:23+00:00): Olá Skippern. Boa tarde. Encontrei estes arquivos em formato Shapefile. Detalhei a situação deles no fórum do OSM (forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=29825), onde concluíram que eles poderiam ser utilizados.
Skippern (2015-02-02 15:04:55+00:00): Obrigado, o @naoliv me pontou neste link depois que eu comentei, to olhando os shapes no momento para ver o que e bom importar. No momento trabalhando com dados do DER-ES em WMS, se quiser eu manda URL em PM
LucFreitas (2015-02-03 01:43:39+00:00): Não me arrisquei ainda a fazer importações de dados para o OSM, estou apenas adicionando algumas informações manualmente, de forma comparativa.
Se desejar me enviar os dados do DER-ES, posso inseri-los também, gradualmente.
Skippern (2015-02-03 01:49:40+00:00): No verdade logo terminando tracer tudo os estradas estaduais, mas vou precisar ajuda verificar se ainda pode existe buracos.

Viu que IJSN também tem shapefile com estradas estaduais e municipais, vou tracer eles depois

Entanto ver que os shapes do estruturas de ensino, saúde, segurança e assistência social tem um formata bom para importação, so preciso definir os valores dos níveis diferente, e verificar que não ha duplicadas, posso importar cada um deles em um changeset (mais grande e 3 mil objetos menus algumas duplicadas)

Outro que seria muito interessante trabalhar e ciclovias e ciclorrotas. Tentei ver se tive algum com hidrovias mas sem sucesso. Credito que aeródromos ja tem tudo no OSM pos fui um tempo atras algum importei tudo do myairport.com
Fischkopp0815 (2015-03-01 12:45:29+00:00): Die Straßen auf dem Krankenhausgelände in Rickling waren vorher alle als highway=service erfasst. Ich halte das für richtig. highway=road ist nur vorrübergehend für Straßen deren Klassifikation noch nicht klar ist.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway
Kiezkickerde (2015-03-06 08:47:45+00:00): Da gebe ich dir Recht und werde das die Tage ändern. Hatte mich von dem Namen abschrecken lassen, weil das so nach "Belieferungsstrasse, nicht für die Allgemeinheit zugänglich" klang, aber die Wikiseite ist da dann doch recht eindeutig. Danke und Gruß
Kiezkickerde (2015-03-06 09:34:36+00:00): So, müsste nun erledigt sein, ich hoffe, da nun keinen übersehen zu haben.
joost schouppe (2016-12-09 17:42:22+00:00): Ook alweer twee jaar geleden, maar weet je nog waarom je dit fietspad als access=permissive hebt gezet? Misschien omwille van de constructie iets noordelijker - die is nu zo ongeveer af blijkbaar, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/RutgerL/history#map=16/51.2148/3.1876
escada (2016-12-09 18:47:58+00:00): Kan je de link naar de OSM way eens vermelden ? Zeker dat die permissive van mij komt en niet van een split ?
joost schouppe (2016-12-09 20:24:40+00:00): Oei, link vergeten, sorry. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326037129/history
Denk dat het inderdaad weer geen tag van jou is... Er zitten precies nog zo'n paar permissive fietspaden hier in de buurt.
escada (2016-12-09 20:27:42+00:00): Ik kijk niet altijd de tags na als ik een weg splits of verder trek. waarschijnlijk zoiets. Tag zal er wel af mogen
M!dgard (2017-08-27 14:21:21+00:00): Let ook op voor de betekenis van "permissive": dat wil zeggen dat de weg  privé-eigendom is waar de eigenaar passage toestaat (en dat voorrecht ook weer kan intrekken, dus er is geen wettelijk recht op doorgang), niet dat je toestemming moet hebben (gebruik "private"). Een zeer ongelukkig gekozen value.
woodpeck (2019-09-11 11:29:09+00:00): Hello hesdrib, in this changeset 4 years ago you have added a pizzeria "Adria" in Recht. Someone has emailed the DWG saying that this venue is now closed. Is this something that you can independently verify? (DWG Ticket#2019091110000061)