piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:42:08+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Rodrigo Rega (2021-05-07 16:00:40+00:00): Hola, gracias por tus aportaciones al mapa. Te escribo ya que quedó etiquetado el bosque con el nombre "Bosque". Hay que tener en cuenta que al no ser el nombre, sería más bien una descripción, no se debería poner como nombre "Bosque". Veo que ya lo arregló otro compañero, así que actualmente ya está correcto. Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102538330
mariotomo (2021-06-04 15:54:41+00:00): hola, bienvenido a OSM, quieres ayuda para mapear bien? aquí te sugiero tres cosas que mejorar: 
- no utilices el campo "name" para explicar qué es una cosa; 
- limita la extensión de cada edición a una sola zona;
- cuidado a los avisos del software de edición.
(encontré tus cambios pues pusiste "building=house" a un entero barria de Santiago de Veraguas.)
tenemos muchos recursos para conversar, revisa el wiki, gracias y disfruta del mapear.
Rom1 (2021-04-19 20:54:11+00:00): Bonjour, à quoi correspond note=Schiller ? Merci.
Kifuz (2021-04-20 05:15:55+00:00): Bonjour,
Quand j'ai renseigné le défibrillateur sur la page "projet du mois", il était demandé de renseigner la marque du défibrillateur sur un des champs. Je suppose que tout a été transposé sur une note ^^. Et c'est le cas pour tous les autres en général
Rom1 (2021-04-20 20:55:43+00:00): Bonsoir, ok dans ce cas à la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator il y a le tag "manufacturer" où justement "Schiller" est donné en exemple. Vous pouvez faire la correction ? Merci.
Kifuz (2021-06-02 09:45:37+00:00): Bonjour,
Désolé pour le retard ^^"
Normalement, c'est fait !
Rom1 (2021-06-03 19:55:13+00:00): Bonsoir. Nickel, merci d'avoir pris en compte mon observation.
Kha_nam (2021-04-16 09:38:32+00:00): Hi Peggywu 
fixed the alignment of the residential way kindly refer with node 370246534
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102646645
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102538570
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:54:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927553614/history
有重覆加了學校了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102538677
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:42:29+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Kha_nam (2021-04-14 05:38:35+00:00): Hi thchen_m
fixed the over lapping highway kindly refer with way 927553824 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102901192
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102538721
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-25 22:51:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103594144 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still somewhat problematical.
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:37:25+00:00): 你好：

你畫了不少建築物，如 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927554219/history
但跟空照圖相比，空照圖卻顯示應該有二棟以上，而非單一一棟。
如果你要反應土地利用，請用 landuse=residential
OpenStreetMap 只允許現實存在的事物，如果不修正的話，你的編輯將會被移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102538787
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:36:38+00:00): 你好，你標示的是校舍，並非整個學校範圍
學校的範圍是這個 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423750596
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102539000
trigpoint (2021-04-08 19:17:42+00:00): This edit is very damaging, please do not add random roads to OSM
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:17:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
ALu68 (2021-04-09 19:46:40+00:00): Hello caarool_,

Please do not use a desription as a name (Casa, Lago, Bosque).
Please read the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre

Thanks.
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:34:23+00:00): 不好意思，你畫了不存在的圓形建築，如不修正為常見的長方形建築，將會被移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102539320
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-08 14:36:38+00:00): Hi ahmadyosefi_mc, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:33:29+00:00): 你好：

你畫了不少建築物，但跟空照圖相比，空照圖卻顯示應該有二棟以上，而非單一一棟。
如果你要反應土地利用，請用 landuse=residential
OpenStreetMap 只允許現實存在的事物，如果不修正的話，你的編輯將會被移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102539747
SomeoneElse (2021-04-11 15:40:52+00:00): Hello yukaichen and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Just to let you know - if you're mapping rectangular buildings, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927561789 , you can square the corners by selecting the building and pressing "q".  Also in the case the building has more than four sides, which should be mapped.
Best Regards,
Andy
BAK365 (2021-04-08 11:33:08+00:00): Für 100 % Konsistenz fehlt nur noch place=*, name=Dorfplatz ;).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:place#Beschreibung
SimonPoole (2021-04-08 12:58:21+00:00): Scheint als hätte sovereign_ch den place tag vergessen gehabt hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33637629
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-04-09 10:26:47+00:00): Hi ☺ It seems from the comment that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3754511510 wasn’t meant to be in this changeset. Can you double-check that it’s fine? Thanks in advance! ☺
alexashh (2021-04-14 03:01:35+00:00): Каким образом ОсмАнд зацепил остров в Атлантическом океане этой правкой?
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-04-14 10:28:32+00:00): Aucune idée 😕 Surtout qu’à y regarder de plus près, rien n’a été modifié sur ce nœud. Bon. Merci ! ☺
ILikeTownsAndCities (2021-04-16 07:04:57+00:00): Please stop making such large changesets. This disrupts mappers in the area.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:16:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:33:13+00:00): 不好意思，你重覆畫道路片段了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102540366
jleedev (2021-04-08 12:38:10+00:00): This changeset deleted McCormick road. iD would have shown a warning prior to saving. Please be careful.

Repaired in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102565199
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-22 16:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103424173 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:32:14+00:00): 你好：

你畫了不少建築物，但跟空照圖相比，空照圖卻顯示應該有二棟以上，而非單一一棟。
如果你要反應土地利用，請用 landuse=residential
OpenStreetMap 只允許現實存在的事物，如果不修正的話，你的編輯將會被移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102540837
eggie (2021-04-08 13:46:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback.. Alle begin is moeilijk.. Door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus heb je adresnodes verplaatst.
Dat kun je hier zien. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102540931

De weg staat nog op construction , want je hebt de specificatie construction=residential laten staan.
Is een straat werkelijk een woonerf met woonerfbebording?
De voorgaande mapper is van mening dat een een residential is.
MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-08 13:56:20+00:00): De adressen heb ik hersteld. De wegen waar de woningen gereed zijn heb ik ontdaan van de construction en op highway=residential gezet. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-08 14:55:09+00:00): Doe je zwarte roodstaat volgende week zelf?
Dan dus ook de regel construction=residential verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:29:45+00:00): 你好：

你畫了不少建築物，但跟空照圖相比，空照圖卻顯示應該有二棟以上，而非單一一棟。
如果你要反應土地利用，請用 landuse=residential
OpenStreetMap 只允許現實存在的事物，如果不修正的話，你的編輯將會被移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102541077
Kha_nam (2021-04-14 05:02:39+00:00): Hi yunhuang
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road and unclassified road kindly check with ways 543197089,
886095590
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102899406
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102541083
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:27:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927570626/history
這要不要重畫，因為實際上並非一大棟建築。如果非現實存在的東西，可能被移除
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102541200
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-03 15:43:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104066832 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:26:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927571914/history
實際上有好幾棟建築，並非一大棟。如果只是要畫土地利用，可以用 landuse=residential
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102541403
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:25:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927575909/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927575910/history
實際上有好幾棟，並非兩大棟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102541980
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:24:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927580668/history
這有好幾棟建築，並非 只有一棟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102542486
NKA (2021-04-10 09:12:55+00:00): Det er fint om du kan følge instruksen for importen når du henter bygninger derfra. Blant annet bruke bygningstypen (building=*), og ta med ref:bygningsnr=*. Ellers må alt dette gjøres på nytt, og det skaper bare ekstra arbeid for andre.
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:23:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927585776/history
這並非一棟建築啊，實際上看空照圖有好幾棟。北邊也類似情形
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102543233
AdVerburg (2021-04-09 13:22:10+00:00): Hi Frédérick,

Please use a bridge | pont | Brücke | brug on Way: 927589771 .
Amicalement Ad
Supaplex (2021-04-09 05:23:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/927590013/history
這有好幾棟建築，並非只有一棟，西側也是一樣情形
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102544008
literan (2024-10-28 09:41:09+00:00): нет там таких кривых поворотов на дороге, это странные глюки на спутнике (скорее всего автоматическая привязка съемки без учета высот). Посмотрите панорамы. Откатил правку.
maraf24 (2021-11-22 20:03:37+00:00): Adresy zduplikowałeś.
ash_win (2021-04-14 13:16:33+00:00): Hi Yute0212,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 868996200
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102932935
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102544972
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 23:31:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103120623 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted previously and morerecent edits still show problems.
user_5173844 (2021-04-08 09:28:43+00:00): Reverted in 102548471
user_5173844 (2021-04-08 11:41:44+00:00): Hi mundlk, I've got a private message from your colleague saying this is a residential road.

My understanding is, this is a guided bus way under construction. Any cars parked there are doing it unofficially and once the bus way is open this will no longer be legally and physically possible.

Houses along the bus way have street names of "Duck Hook Walk" and "Claudius Walk" - they are both footways without car access (by design). In case of Claudius Walk the access vehicle access is from the rear of properties via Roman Close (this is not an isolated case in Northstowe - see Bramley Walk). I'm not sure about Duck Hook Walk, though.

I'd like more locals to confirm the current and planned status of the bus way. Perhaps the plans have changed, in which case I'll be happy to update the map.
user_5173844 (2021-04-08 12:01:07+00:00): As this way is not yet open (and it will not be open for a while) it may be better to tag it as highway=construction, construction=bus_guideway.

Comments?
mundlk (2021-04-12 05:47:30+00:00): HI,
Thanks for the explanation. please let me know if anything else needs to be modified as per the latest update. Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks and Regards,
mundlk.
user_5173844 (2021-04-12 15:08:23+00:00): Hi,
Let's leave it as is for now. Technically, the bus way is still under construction but the default OSM style (Carto) doesn't currently render highway=construction, construction=bus_guideway.
NieWnen (2021-04-08 16:32:11+00:00): Jeśli został dodany dom z adresem, można usunąć ten punkt adresowy nad nim, bo aktualnie jest duplikat adresów. 
Jeśli chodzi o mapowanie budynków, to na OSM głównie mapujemy je od podstawy nie od dachu, większość wykorzystuje warstwę "budynki". W edytorze ID możesz ją znaleźć po prawej stronie w warstwach.  Ale ogólnie jest ok
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102545153
Kha_nam (2021-04-12 10:29:13+00:00): Hi justin Yang 
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with ways 126175630
902551487
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102794699
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102545432
user_5173844 (2021-04-08 09:29:02+00:00): Reverted in 102548471
trigpoint (2021-04-08 19:16:05+00:00): This edit is very damaging, please do not add random roads to OSM
NieWnen (2021-04-08 16:36:09+00:00): Skąd informacja, że budynku nie ma? Odwiedziłeś/aś to miejsce? Na podkładzie Geoportalu istnieje, w warstwie budynków też.

Zachęcam do dodawania źródeł przy edycjach, dzięki temu wiadomo na czym opieramy swoje edycje.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102545746
Quack87 (2021-04-08 18:34:06+00:00): Jestem właścicielm posesji. Budynek został usunięty w 2020 r , powstała w jego miejsce nowa droga dojazdowa do posesji 65 C
Moge wrzucic zdjecie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102545746
NieWnen (2021-04-08 20:29:27+00:00): Jak widziałeś na żywo to wystarczy i wszystko w porządku.

Pytałem, bo niektórzy początkujący usuwają/dodają budynki (i nie tylko) bazując na nieaktualnych zdjęć lotniczych i wychodzą później sprzeczności :P
Akkurator (2021-08-18 00:02:06+00:00): Hallo CrisFromRv,

Der Fußweg ist in der Tat durch einen schmalen Grünstreifen und 2 Bäume von der Fahrbahn getrennt.

Allerdings nicht schon ab Friedrich-Schiller-Straße wie eingezeichnet, sondern erst ab Mitte Hausnr 38 auf ca. 30m Länge.
Außerdem ist er direkt auf der Fahrbahn bzw. dem Radschutzstreifen gezeichnet, er verläuft aber weiter östlich, "rechts" von den beiden Bäumen.

Zudem müsste man in diesem Abschnitt der Jahnstraße das sidewalk-Tag ändern (nur noch left statt both), wenn man den Gehweg separat zeichnet, dazu müsste die Jahnstraße am Beginn des Fußwegs gesplittet werden.

Korrigierst du das bitte noch?

Ersatzweise einfach löschen, falls es den Aufwand wg. 30m nicht wert scheint.

Grüße,
Akkurator

PS: surface=asphalt wäre auch noch gut.
ash_win (2021-04-14 13:03:46+00:00): Hi ellenwu,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check way 428165712
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102932290
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102546162
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-08 14:24:17+00:00): #test #failed

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
gabro00 (2021-04-08 10:32:42+00:00): Így hogy vannak közvetlen linkek, az alt_name kulcsba be lehetne húzni a szinonimákból sztringeket.
itineris (2021-04-08 10:38:11+00:00): Némelyiknél mind a 30-at? Feleslegesnek éreztem.

Ha nagyjából befejezem az OSM barlangok kataszterrel való összekötését, inkább a védettséget hoznám át, illetve ha fizikailag lezárt egy barlang.
gabro00 (2021-04-08 10:57:05+00:00): Na azt azért nem, csak ahol legfeljebb 1-2 van megadva. Jobban megnézve ezek elég szedett-vedett nevek, így nem biztos hogy sokkal előrébb lennénk velük.

A lezártság viszont tényleg hasznos.
NieWnen (2021-04-08 16:44:25+00:00): Nie nazywamy tak ulic, więc nazwa do poprawy, chyba, że realnie ma taką nazwę urzędową. Jeśli droga nie ma nazwy możesz dodać noname=yes, ale nie jest to wymagane w przypadku highway=service. Przy okazji jeśli to jest czymś w rodzaju podjazdu do posesji możesz dodać service=driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102546756
Quack87 (2022-11-29 13:14:18+00:00): Droga jest w linii prostej , budynek po lewej stronie drogi został wyburzony.
widoczne zmiany na najnowszych zdjęciach satelitarnych
Map-Peter (2021-04-08 22:18:18+00:00): Hallo selanger, 
 
"healthcare=physiotherapist" war vorher schon richtig. 
 
Bitte nur "https://" nehmen wenn es das auch wirklich ist und nicht wie hier "http://" . 
 
Habe ich gerade korrigiert. 
 
Gruß Peter
martinst (2021-08-12 07:54:21+00:00): Es heißt richtig Jagdhütte, nicht Jagthütte
!bm (2021-04-09 16:41:46+00:00): Hallo Canatschi,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM und vielen Dank für deine Hinzufügung!

Wie schreibt sich der Verein nun? Leider gibt es auf der Website (noch) kein Impressum, aber dort "Nass" statt "Naß" und keine Jahreszahl. Daher habe ich ein entsprechendes fixme=* (bzw die Schreibweise als operator=*) hinzugefügt.

Bitte beachte auch die Syntax von phone und website – ich habe diese korrigiert und unter contact:*-Tags zusammengefasst.[1]

Meine Änderungen/Korrekturen in [2] kannst du am besten per OSMCha [2a] und [3] nachvollziehen.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact
[2] https://osmcha.org/changesets/102656961/
[2a] https://osmcha.org/changesets/102656961/
[3] https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/927609505

--besteGrüße!bm
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-08 14:24:28+00:00): And again:
#test #failed

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
southglos (2021-04-08 16:21:55+00:00): This changeset has drawn new highway=secondary ways over the top of existing residential and service roads. I have reverted in changeset 102577962.
Xevi (2021-08-01 16:52:46+00:00): Cuidado, vas eliminar el tag de gasolinera d'aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/839471321
southglos (2021-04-08 16:21:14+00:00): This changeset has drawn new highway=secondary ways over the top of existing residential and service roads. I have reverted in changeset 102578048.
southglos (2021-04-08 16:20:42+00:00): This changeset has drawn new highway=secondary ways over the top of existing residential and service roads. I have reverted in changeset 102577992.
Becky Candy (2021-05-10 09:29:07+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102547964
!bm (2021-04-09 17:47:50+00:00): Hallo repoi,

im Kreuzungsbereich müsste es *=lane sein? (auch an der hier nicht geänderten, südl highway)

--besteGrüße!bm
repoi (2021-04-10 07:37:26+00:00): Hallo !bm,

ich habe mich das auch gefragt und auch deshalb den review_request gesetzt. Da du das auch so machen würdest, habe ich den Radweg nun in Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102684357 geändert.

Beste Grüße
repoi
!bm (2021-04-10 13:03:07+00:00): Danke dir – leider kommt iD nicht (immer) mit Relationen klar und hat im oben genannten Cs eine zerhackt. Ich habe die Gelegenheit genutzt, hier noch minimal weiter zu verbessern in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102697568
--bg!bm
Richard (2022-01-22 17:20:40+00:00): Hi - not sure what you were trying to achieve here but the bus=yes tag already indicates that PSV access is permitted. motor_vehicle should be no because the road is closed to private cars. I've changed it back.
southglos (2021-04-08 16:19:50+00:00): This changeset has drawn new highway=secondary ways over the top of existing residential and service roads.  I have reverted in changeset 102577914.
osmviborg (2021-04-08 09:52:56+00:00): Hej. Ved krydset Anbækvej & Elmevej er der et punkt med alle de relevante oplysninger for byen. Jeg har slettet din redigering.
rthik007 (2021-04-14 09:54:22+00:00): Hi Jayjayc_m,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road WAY: 114651284, and also extended the residential road way 732829174 to give connectivity. Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102919635
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102919814
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102549229
RicoElectrico (2021-04-08 11:09:12+00:00): Ta zmiana jest całkowicie fikcyjna, wycofałem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102557820

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=825405#p825405