piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2017-01-17 03:55:04+00:00): Je hebt geprobeerd om een wandelpad aan te brengen op OSM. Vermoedelijk ging dit per ongeluk. Je hebt namelijk een stuk gras gewijzigd in een voetgangersgebied.
Ik heb inmiddels de noodzakelijke wijzigingen aangebracht. 
Het is niet erg dat je deze beginnersfoutjes maakt, mijn verzoek is daarom je mutaties klein te houden. 
Zie twee plaatjes hieronder.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/x9lhgr1psqjpwrd/2017-01-17_04-50-39.png?raw=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zg8kmxs7bo19hba/2017-01-17_04-51-35.png?raw=1
Commodoortje (2017-01-17 04:10:10+00:00): Er zijn nog meer paden in dit park volgens mij. 
Succes met in kaart brengen.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-01-17 07:17:31+00:00): Reverted the changeset and brought back the footways.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-01-17 07:09:40+00:00): Hi aleksey82, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You are free to edit any part of the world. In this changeset, you have deleted a main road which lasted for long days. I'm getting it back to OpenStreetMap. Please be careful while you edit and upload.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-01-17 07:10:05+00:00): Привет aleksey82, Добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap. Вы можете редактировать любую часть мира. В этом ревизией, вы удалили главную дорогу, которая длилась в течение долгих дней. Я получаю его обратно в OpenStreetMap. Пожалуйста, будьте осторожны во время редактирования и загрузки.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-01-17 07:35:55+00:00): Reverted the changeset and brought back the village polygon feature.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-01-17 07:26:06+00:00): Reverted the changeset.
vincent_95 (2017-01-16 22:31:48+00:00): Oops. Wrong changeset comment
Baloo Uriza (2017-01-17 18:21:56+00:00): I think you meant "highway=service" leading into the Owasso 8th Grade Center, not tertiary.  This looks like a driveway and a parking lot, not the main road through a neighborhood.
cadab321 (2017-01-17 19:28:23+00:00): You are absolutely right, it is a private drive. I fixed it, thanks!
Baloo Uriza (2017-01-17 20:28:54+00:00): No problem.  Don't mean to sound overly critical, especially to new names... just trying to avoid priority creep on what gets mapped.
Peilscheibe (2017-01-18 10:45:24+00:00): Hallo forfex, welchen Sinn haben denn die eingefügten Leerzeichen? Die Ziele auf den Wegweisern sind ja nun mit Semikola abgetrennte Wertelisten und der jeweilige Wert nach dem Semikolon fängt ja nicht mit einem Leerzeichen an, findest Du nicht?
forfex (2017-01-18 16:43:35+00:00): Nun ja, die Änderungen habe ich aufgrund folgenden Artikels gemacht: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:information%3Dguidepost

Zumal SI-Einheiten immer so geschrieben werden:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationales_Einheitensystem#Schreibweise_der_Einheitenzeichen

Und weil die MapCSS Regelprüfung in JOSM bei z.B. Höhen- und Breitenangaben ebenfalls eine Warning ausgibt, wenn kein Leerzeichen zwischen Wert und Einheit steht.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapCSS/0.2

Gruß,
forfex
Peilscheibe (2017-01-18 22:26:46+00:00): Hallo forfex, sorry, ich habe mich unvollständig ausgedrückt. Zwischen Wert und Einheit gehört natürlich ein Leerzeichen, die meinte ich auch gar nicht. Sondern die nach den Semikola in den Aufzählungen, wie z.B. hier drin: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2348446816 oder hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2349081596
Im zweiten Beispiel ist der zweite Wert nach Norden ja einfach nur "Monrepos" und nicht " Monrepos" mit führendem Leerzeichen.
Grüße,
P.
forfex (2017-01-19 17:45:31+00:00): Das ist ein Punkt, hängt aber z.T. auch vom Werkzeug ab.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator#Space_character_padding
Gruß,
forfex
Peilscheibe (2017-02-13 17:09:07+00:00): Nun, nur weil es irgendein Werkzeug irgendwie macht, ergibt das noch lange keinen Sinn. Und führende Leerzeichen in einer Werteliste sind gaga, eine Implementation die sowas macht ist kaputt, IMO. Das macht nur Arbeit, muss man es schließlich bei einer Auswertung wieder wegparsen.
helenst (2017-01-21 09:16:13+00:00): I'm not sure you meant to add that email address to several nodes and ways... I'll remove it (and it does seem to show the steps :)
mueschel (2017-01-17 09:53:39+00:00): Hi,
all these buildings have the key 'shrt' - is this a mistake during import? It's not used in any other place.

Jan
Andrew Matheny (2017-01-17 16:16:58+00:00): Jan-

Yep, this is an extra tag I bring in during the import to be able to categorize buildings that overlap multiple land uses. I've removed them from the buildings.

Thanks!

Andrew
merylstreet (2017-01-17 05:57:32+00:00): Hi Iain, this area is being completely rebuilt, now its mostly condos and constructions sites with a few green patches, does scrub still apply?
Iain Turner (2017-01-17 07:13:48+00:00): I was planning to take a cycle past to see how much green is left.  Scrub is perhaps a better description than the previous land use.  If this area is being fully developed though then it's best to remove all the 'green'.  If you know better then please update as you consider correct. Incidentally I'm going through the map adding all the green undeveloped areas that are left, but in Bangkok perhaps they get built on soon.
merylstreet (2017-01-18 00:58:12+00:00): The north part of the area is still scrub I would say but all the south has been built or just a few patches left of vegetations. I live in this area so I will check again this weekend and update
5m4u9 (2017-01-17 08:22:18+00:00): bueno, al menos esta vez es buena edición
Myazyk (2017-01-18 14:05:13+00:00): Не пиши у зв'язку села Яворів теґ landuse=residential, бо тоді територію Західного спортивного цент показує як житлову зону
З тим селом треба побавитись і понарисовувати всі житлові ділянки
Myazyk (2017-01-18 14:06:02+00:00): Західного реабілітаційно-спортивного центру*
Alexander-II (2017-01-17 02:06:08+00:00): Смотрю, вы пробовали отрисовать дом в 3D. Почитайте https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Simple_3D_buildings и https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building Если что-то будет непонятно, можете спросить у меня. Я недавно вчитывался и вроде разобрался. Еще вы на территории Селятино создали, без шуток, 689 линий без тэгов. Им надо будет задать тэги или удалить.
Вы используете JOSM, там есть встроенный механизм проверки (shift-v). Поможет избежать таких случаев.
Alexander-II (2017-01-17 02:44:13+00:00): С 3D погорячился. Конкретно это здание отрисовано как надо. Но есть 10 домов, где бардак с мультиполигонами.
5m4u9 (2017-01-17 08:23:19+00:00): cambio malo, revertiré porque quita prioridad sobre vías
srividya_c (2017-01-17 09:09:10+00:00): Hi fayor, 

Looks like you have deleted many service and residential roads in this changeset which are visible in Satellite imagery. Is there any reason for these deletions? 

Sembra che avete cancellato molti servizi e strade residenziali che sono visibili nelle immagini satellitari. C'è qualche ragione di queste eliminazioni?

Thanks
Hjart (2017-03-20 16:17:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3404320592 er en dublet (se bygning), men med 2 forskellige fvst løbenumre
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2017-03-20 20:57:51+00:00): Tak, rettet.
Det er endda en af mine lokale kiosker.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-18 19:58:20+00:00): Hi Jenna M, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
ScottNelson (2017-01-18 09:21:56+00:00): something has gone wrong with the rendering of a water polygon in the Beverley Lake area and I think this edit may be to blame.  However, when I render my own map from a geofabrik.de extract, everything is fine.  Maybe the OSM rendering server has some corrupted data?
Glassman (2017-01-17 06:16:11+00:00): It looks like private property. Is this actually a park?
Viajero Perdido (2017-04-24 20:40:06+00:00): Nicely done.
Владимир К (2017-01-18 15:00:19+00:00): там только банкомат без банка или банк с банкоматом?
SomeoneElse (2023-12-20 18:25:45+00:00): Hello,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 7(!) years ago.  On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228759987 (and also on a couple of other changes too). We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2025-04-24 10:13:31+00:00): Thanks for updating this to say that the change was based on local knowledge.
nevw (2017-01-18 07:38:37+00:00): Is there is motel named "Home" here or are you referring to the Walpole Hotel accommodation or the Bayside Villas or has this been entered by mistake and you have added your own home location?
I have mapped the Walpole Hotel and Bayside Villas. This is a public map.
nevw (2017-01-23 10:53:21+00:00): no response, deleted "Home" node
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:12:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Владимир К (2017-01-18 14:57:26+00:00): и зачем всем знать что вы спали тут?
Artem Kuznetsov (2017-01-18 15:14:22+00:00): Незачем. Даже не знаю как метка перенеслась сюда. Поищу как удалить.
Владимир К (2017-01-19 06:34:20+00:00): Не ищите, я уже удалил.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-17 16:52:01+00:00): Thanks!
Tomas Straupis (2017-01-17 10:26:50+00:00): Please do not adjust objects according to non adjusted bing ortophoto. It is very badly positioned and therefore you're damaging good data.

ORT10LT is a local imagery with good placement.
literan (2017-01-17 11:20:01+00:00): и зачем удалять общую точку у дорог? не мост же там. Откатываю.
literan (2017-01-17 11:20:22+00:00): шлагбаум убрал
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:13:11+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
literan (2017-01-17 11:11:39+00:00): не надо добавлять в поле name описания, это не Викимапия. Все это будет удалено
eggie (2018-05-29 20:43:17+00:00): Joris.. iemand heeft net je track verwijderd in deze changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59376851#map=15/51.5005/4.3615
. Klopt het dat dit pad al weer weg is?  Graag reactie
MVG,
Eggie
Joris579 (2018-05-29 21:29:24+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Ik woon hier heel dicht bij en kan bevestigen dat de weg nog bestaat. Het was eerst een zandweg die nu geasfalteerd is. Ik twijfel alleen nog of de weg voorrang geeft aan fietsers.
eggie (2018-05-29 21:33:45+00:00): Oke... Dan zal ik de changeset proberen terug te draaien. Laat het zo weten.
eggie (2018-05-29 21:45:41+00:00): Dag Joris,
De changeset-revert is gelukt. Het klopt weer. Er loopt zelfs een fiets- en een wandelroute op. Waarom de  mapper de weg heeft verwijderd is een compleet raadsel. 
name=bankje heb ik daardoor  ook verwijderd. Een reactie heb ik niet ontvangen, maar dat gebeurt wel meer.

Hartelijke groet,
Eggie
ДмитрийС (2017-01-18 10:49:11+00:00): улица не переименована зачем исправлять название?
Supaplex (2017-01-19 17:51:32+00:00): Do you mean bench?
Jole22 (2017-01-20 01:44:01+00:00): Hi, no, my maps.me app is in korean for some reason, so i add a placeholder to be chamged im the correct  poi. It is a small Buddhist temple.
MrYadro (2017-01-17 09:49:53+00:00): Hello salmin are you sure that this buildings have such a weird shape?
salmin (2017-01-17 10:06:35+00:00): I've been there a couple of times, but I'm not sure the current shape is precise. Most likely, angles between sections are straight and sections share adjacent walls (don't have gaps between them). A friend of mine lives there, I'll ask him to send a photo to clarify this.

My primary goal so far was to denote that they share the same address.
Commodoortje (2017-01-17 14:14:25+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
blackadder (2017-01-18 09:53:51+00:00): Was this just a test edit? You are adding to the live database.
I have reverted your entry as it doesn't appear to be a valid entity but let me know if I have that wrong?
user_5359 (2017-01-18 19:59:04+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-18 19:56:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-18 19:55:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Geofreund1 (2019-04-25 10:14:17+00:00): Hallo valeravir,
du hast in Achern die Adresse Schwarzwaldstraße 4 eingetragen. Maps4BW verzeichnet dort die Adresse Rathausstraße 15.
Könntest du das bitte mal prüfen?
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-17 20:44:12+00:00): Hi rrrrrrk, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways and pois in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45238722
rrrrrrk (2017-01-18 03:10:18+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your suggestion.
To tell the truth, I deleted it by judging it with an aerial photograph of "edit".
I actually knew this place, in recent years development has been progressing a lot and parks are on the increase.
Due to the countryside, many of the maps that were present were old, and there were many things that were missing, even those seen from aerial photographs.

So I changed it with an easy idea. This is not good. I'm sorry.
I would like to confirm when actually visiting.

I am using a translation machine, so I'm sorry if it is difficult for you to understand my English.
FahRadler (2017-01-19 14:55:10+00:00): Feldweg , kein Fußweg s. wiki
-> revertiert
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-18 08:00:34+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-18 19:59:26+00:00): Hi AnkitJ, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Commodoortje (2017-01-17 19:50:53+00:00): Is de vorm recentelijk aangepast?
En wat bedoel je precies met wateropslag?
coeneisma (2017-01-17 21:30:38+00:00): Ja, recentelijk aangepast. En precies wat er staat: wateropslag. Dit zal steeds meer gebeuren in grootstedelijke gebieden: door veel bestrating, weinig groen en steeds meer neerslag worden er oplossingen gezocht voor tijdelijke wateropslag in geval van hevige regenval. Dit speelveld loopt dus letterlijk vol om de riolering te ontzien.
Commodoortje (2017-01-17 21:42:26+00:00): Vandaar de ronde vorm. Succes met mappen
user_5359 (2017-01-18 19:49:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Peilscheibe (2017-02-13 17:04:47+00:00): Hallo Dogger,

ist der Eigenname der Toiletten "Halle 1" etc. oder haben die eigentlich gar keinen Namen?
Aboudrar Said (2017-01-17 13:35:06+00:00): pourquoi avez vous supprimer les border-types que j'ai ajouté?
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-17 20:42:43+00:00): Hi pvrk, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting several highway in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45240731
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
nebulon42 (2017-02-13 20:12:59+00:00): Ich hätte mir schon eine Kontaktaufnahme erwartet, bevor du meine Änderungen einfach so rückgängig machst. Nicht gerade die feine Art, oder?
Protoxenus (2017-02-03 13:57:16+00:00): Du hast die Lokalität von amenity:cafe in amenity:ice_cream geändert. Warst du da vor Ort? Als ich das letzte Mal darauf geachtet habe, war das ein Café, in dem man Kaffee und Kuchen und Speiseeis bekam. Hat sich da etwas geändert, das mitten im Winter ein umtaggen rechtfertigt? 
Der laden heißt zwar Eisdiele, es ist aber ein Café und sollte auch so getaggt werden.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:44:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
Luuuddooo (2017-01-18 18:14:18+00:00): Bonjour, 

dans votre commentaire vous citez G Maps et Géoportail qui fournissent des cartes propriétaires, et qu'il est donc  interdit d'utiliser pour contribuer au projet OpenStreetMap. 
Voire la page suivante: 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Questions_fr%C3%A9quentes_l%C3%A9gales#2a._Puis-je_contribuer_.C3.A0_partir_de_Google_Maps.2FNokia_Maps.2F..._.3F


Pouvez-vous annuler toutes vos modifications basé sur ces sources ni libres ni autorisées ?

Ludo.
Boby26100 (2017-01-18 18:40:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Je me suis peut-être mal exprimé sur mes commentaires, mais je n'ai pas fais de captures ou de copier-coller depuis ces sites conformément à la charte, c'est juste que je m'en suis servi de références visuelles  afin de placer au mieux les modifications sur la carte OSM suite aux erreurs cartographiques constatées lors de mes déplacements... 

Après même si ce procédé est interdit,  je comprends mieux pourquoi les cartes sont truffées d'erreurs et que les logiciels de navigations fonctionnant par le biais d'OMS ont des fonctionnements aberrants... Veuillez m'expliquer comment les autres contributeurs procèdent et si ils disent tous la vérité sur les sources de leurs ajouts et/ou modifications  :)

Merci de me confirmer si malgré celà mes modifs doivent êtres supprimées ou seulement mes commentaires citant mes sources.

Bien cordialement.

Emmanuel CRUMIERE
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
user_5359 (2017-01-17 17:30:27+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-17 17:32:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The minimal number of keys for a correct address is two: add:housenumer and add:street (Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr).
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:44:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
mavl (2017-10-14 11:08:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52919669 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45217709].
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.