piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sorcrosc (2021-04-17 21:08:14+00:00): Grazie. Sarebbe utile se tu potessi rimapparle dove si trovano ora.
Intanto ho ripristinato il civico di una delle due che immagino esista ancora anche se non occupato dalla farmacia e una piscina che mi risulta ancora esistente.
Ti consiglio di evitare le immagini Bing perché sono confuse e male allineate. Le Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta di solito sono buone, altrimenti le PCN 2006 e 2012 sono considerate ottime come allineamento anche se datate.
Ciao
BimBumBam (2021-04-17 21:38:15+00:00): Le nuove posizioni le volevo aggiornare quando uscivo perchè si trovano entrambe in delle schiere schiere di edifici e "a freddo" quali siano di precisamente non saprei scegliere. E grazie per gli altri suggerimenti!!!
woodpeck (2021-04-21 22:38:33+00:00): Dear uran-236, do you have a source for your naming of this lake? 

Дорогой uran-236, есть ли у вас источник названия этого озера?
eggie (2021-04-17 15:03:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
feedback:  Let op dat je de vlakken niet vastplakt aan de objecten.
area=yes doet niets in OSM
Wat is de meerwaarde om de vlakken over de loopgraven te leggen? 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103102493

Door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus verplaats je al snel objecten zonder dat je dat wil. 
(De boom)

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
JeePeeNL (2021-04-17 15:46:21+00:00): Hi Eggie, dank je voor de tips, ik ga ze lezen.

Het is een gebied met loopgraven, waarvan een deel ook als wandelpad wordt gebruikt. Op de kaart zijn ze alleen als pad gemarkeerd, dus het leek me logisch om dat te behouden en het gebied te markeren als loopgraven. Niet goed?

Wat bedoel je met area=yes doet niets in osm? Ik heb die instelling niet toegevoegd. Ik heb alleen die vlakken van de loopgraven toegevoegd, zoals je in de introdemo voor de speeltuin moest doen.

Mijn bedoeling was alleen die twee gebieden met loopgraven te markeren. Bij de controle bij opslaan zag ik dat er teveel was gewijzigd (idd de boom en een pad), maar ik kon geen enkele manier vinden om alléén die onderdelen ongedaan te maken. Ook in de help kon ik er niets over vinden, dwz, wel dat je moet controleren, maar niet hoe je individuele wijzigingen ongedaan kunt maken.
eggie (2021-04-17 16:00:27+00:00): In het begin is alles rijstebrij in OSM.
historic=Loopgraven is geen valide tag.  area=yes zou wel kunnen icm een andere tag.
De taal in osm is UK English
Het zou dat historic=trench oid moeten zijn, maar in de wiki vind ik alleen military=trench en die tag staat op de loopgraven zelf. 
Die loopgraven staan echter al op de kaart als lijnelement.  Dat bedoelde ik met "Wat voegt het toe?"
De loopgraven zijn immers al getagd. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Dtrench

De boom voorzover heb ik ergens teruggeplaatst waar een boom op de foto te herkennen was. De vlakken heb ik losgemaakt van de paden.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-04-17 16:03:54+00:00): Denk dat je er in ieder geval dan historic=trench ( steeds enkelvoud)  van moet maken ipv Loopgraven.
In de description maak je dan weer duidelijk wat het in het Nederlands betekent.
JeePeeNL (2021-04-17 16:58:14+00:00): * military=trench tag staat op de loopgraven zelf
Mmm, had ik niet gezien. Blijkt dat je voor die info behoorlijk moet doorklikken.

* Loopgraven is geen valide tag
Ik heb het type gewijzigd in 'battlefield', dan blijven de loopgraven zelf military=trench.

* Boom
Dank je

Bedankt voor je hulp.
eggie (2021-04-17 17:28:35+00:00): Nou... ...Heb mn grote twijfels. De vlakken zou ik verwijderen als ik jou was.
De loopgraven zijn getagd.
 Welke slag is hier geleverd... even los van de luchtlandingen bij operatie Market Garden sept 1944?
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-04-17 17:30:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dbattlefield
olo81 (2021-04-17 16:04:06+00:00): ponakładane obszary o takiej samej funkcji, nazwa parafii powinna iść do tagu operator. Literówki w nazwach.
eggie (2021-04-17 15:07:30+00:00): Dag JeePee..
Wat wordt hier bedoeld met historic-monument
Meestal is dat een groot gebouw om iemnad te herdenken. Denk aan de Tai Mahal in India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
Is dit ook een gebouw of wellicht meet een historic=memorial?
Gedenkplaats. 
MVG
eggie
JeePeeNL (2021-04-17 15:31:23+00:00): Hi Eggie, aan dat item heb ik niets gewijzigd, althans, niet willen wijzigen. 

De situatie op de kaart was dat dit monument er stond + twee keer een bankje. Ik heb één bankje verwijderd.

Het monument is een bank, maar dat wilde ik niet zomaar wijzigen. 

Dit is info over die bank.
https://www.oudede.nl/wp-content/uploads/simple-file-list/Nijenhuis/012-De-Graaf-Bentinck-Bank.pdf
eggie (2021-04-17 15:40:50+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.. Op de foto zie ik overigens twee bankjes voor het 'monument'

Veel plezier met mappen
Eggie
JeePeeNL (2021-04-17 16:02:54+00:00): Haha ja klopt, maar eigenlijk is het gewoon één punt. De bankjes en het monument horen bij elkaar.
eggie (2021-04-17 16:05:05+00:00): Up to you als lokale mapper.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 14:23:36+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102513241, 102514246, 102514306, 102514339, 102514393, 102514429, 102514501, 102514539, 102514648, 102515111, 102515143, 102515225, 102515290, 102515316, 102515341, 102515362, 102515375, 102515400, 102515421, 102515439, 102515456, 102515475, 102515493, 102515510, 102515530, 102515555, 102515625, 102515641, 102515914, 102516066, 102516086, 102516120, 102516142, 102516162, 102516182, 102516191, 102516204, 102516223, 102516282, 102516311, 102516326, 102516547, 102516568, 102516598, 102516629, 102516653, 102516671, 102516712, 102516749, 102516770, 102518272, 102518315, 102518334, 102518348, 102518363, 102518386, 102518431, 102518451, 102518474, 102518499, 102518514, 102518538, 102518572, 102518604, 102518621, 102518653, 102518678, 102518705, 102518727, 102518758, 102518805, 102518834, 102518862, 102518887, 102518913, 102518943, 102518961, 102518977, 102518996, 102519015, 102519041, 102519064, 102519375, 102519466, 102519765, 102520193, 102520823, 102521197, 102521681, 102521724, 102521895, 102521953, 102522722, 102523199, 102523485, 102523837, 102524825, 102525245, 102525508, 102527880, 102530401, 102555853, 102557103, 102557467, 102557559, 102558764, 102595686, 102595859, 102596120, 102596837, 102597191, 102598600, 102599251, 102601364, 102601820, 102602950, 102604125, 102605237, 102608724, 102609205, 102609329, 102609478, 102611588, 102623174, 102631108, 102633551, 102635280, 102636871, 102774961, 102791206, 102841396.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-17 14:43:28+00:00): I've been through the ways where another mapper has edited these ways after the Micron mapper, and tidied up https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103105190 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103105993 .  All other post-Micron way edits look like valid corrections.
eggie (2021-04-17 15:10:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Tip:
Tegenwoordig taggen we de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers als
oneway:bicycle=no

en indien nodig
oneway:moped=no
oneway:mofa=no

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Palolo (2021-04-23 23:57:35+00:00): @sgdwn We appreciate the help mapping Tanzania. Please use the learn OSM guides to learn how to accurately trace buildings. Please take the time to accurately map buildings and make square corners using the q key.
Dawid2849 (2021-04-21 10:55:49+00:00): Cześć. Dlaczego edytowałeś korzystając z podkładu Bing, dodatkowo zapominając o jego kalibracji?
tanonin (2022-08-25 19:49:34+00:00): /way/931746874 lotissement du bel air: merci d'ajouter les bâtiments en fonction du cadastre histoire de ne pas avoir à tous reprendre 2  fois
Cebderby (2021-05-12 22:53:45+00:00): What was your source for setting the height of the tower down to 53m?   I think I can see where you got it from, but OSM needs to know where you are sourcing the information from for your edits, user googlenaut.
Also, you need to make sure all the external building:parts use *all* the relevant building outline nodes, else you can leave a crack as you did here.  
Also if you add extra space ready for more building parts you need to add those parts, else the default building height (the overall height if specified or a default based eg on the size of the building) will get used as here.  
Also if you use 'saltbox' roof shape it descends in all directions which is not appropriate if you need half of that shape.
Also its fine to have building part areas arranged horizontally apart, and they don't need arbitrarily changing to vertical stacking.
Also if you move an alignment, even if it was poor, you need to adjust more than one adjacent node, maybe a whole area is consistent and needs doing all or not at all.
Also building relations are an added complication which is rarely (never?) needed, eg the most 'simple 3d building' compliant viewer f4map doesn't refer to them at all.
This set of changes wasn't ok, changes have not been retained.
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2021-06-24 02:16:59+00:00): Olá C210,
Esta é uma área de objeto ou edifício?(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/931752805) porque cruza com um corpo de água dentro do objeto.(https://maproulette.org/challenge/17412/task/97104459)

você se importaria de consertá-lo? deixe-me saber se houver dados de atualização. Obrigada
K4nciasty (2021-04-17 15:15:35+00:00): budynków
Otenkiya (2021-05-02 03:46:05+00:00): 報告：鵠沼橋付近の対向分離編集に伴い、リレーション：国道134号に断絶が発生。修正済み。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102034665, 102035420, 102084036, 102084069, 102374933, 102375080, 102375159, 102375670, 102376342, 102377743, 102377930, 102378758, 102379814, 102381607, 102383714, 102384051, 102385246, 102386036, 102387096, 102387491, 102391073, 102436866, 102436881, 102436911, 102436951, 102436993, 102437033, 102437102, 102437135, 102437152, 102437154, 102437220, 102437252, 102437279, 102437296, 102437312, 102437351, 102437383, 102437436, 102437459, 102437478, 102437544, 102437573, 102437709, 102437759, 102437868, 102437985, 102438418, 102438749, 102438818, 102438982, 102439079, 102439215, 102439324, 102440798, 102440990, 102441240, 102441451, 102442031, 102442176, 102449239, 102449313, 102449600, 102449738, 102450189, 102450473, 102457062, 102457342, 102457440, 102458219, 102458639, 102459098, 102459727, 102459949, 102460040, 102511084, 102511125, 102511514, 102511595, 102511890, 102511927, 102512104, 102512393, 102513623, 102513666, 102513697, 102513760, 102514057, 102518932, 102519061, 102519507, 102519626, 102519730, 102520966, 102522054, 102525392, 102526276, 102526918, 102527957, 102530642, 102530837, 102532261, 102534131, 102536325, 102537962, 102538818, 102539005, 102545565, 102547361, 102547590, 102547845, 102548877, 102594816, 102594964, 102595048, 102595146, 102595351, 102595615, 102595801, 102595899, 102595994, 102596179, 102596286, 102596415, 102596475, 102597336, 102676010, 102676067, 102676094, 102676956, 102677132, 102677173, 102677409, 102677484, 102677653, 102677775, 102677826, 102677890, 102678103, 102678348, 102678454, 102678662, 102678825, 102678968, 102679164, 102682055, 102682141, 102682219, 102682303, 102682348, 102682496, 102682723, 102682823, 102683086, 102683209, 102683396, 102683439, 102690502, 102690667, 102691828, 102692586, 102851462.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-17 21:47:19+00:00): I've been through a sample of the 80-odd way changes that were blocked by subsequent edit.  All the ones I looked at where valid improvements.  The 250-odd failed deletions are also likely to be valid improvements too.
dgitto (2021-04-21 06:02:15+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2021-04-21 06:22:34+00:00): Ciao, ti consiglierei di non inserire edifici ricalcandoli dalle ortofoto. Non vengono bene e si dovrà prima o poi cancellarli e ridisegnarli. Ti aiuterò io a inserire gli edifici, come ho fatto a Milici. Tu potresti inserire i negozi, i nomi delle strade, e tante altre cose che possono essere rilevate solo sul campo.
abakus_uploader (2021-04-17 22:32:10+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ruboqif (2021-04-18 09:51:08+00:00): Bonjour, Il y a bien un petit parking (6 places dont 1pmr) devant les commerces Simplement Vin et Franprix.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-05-01 12:53:43+00:00): hej, nie zaznaczaj trawy tam gdzie jej nie ma

np https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.08081/19.89218&layers=N https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.08099/19.89132&layers=N

Widać to na zdjęciach lotniczych Geoportalu.
tjburne (2021-04-22 00:00:01+00:00): Hi, is there any reason these were all changed? this has stopped applications working in TMR due to the tag update...
colgza (2021-04-22 00:32:16+00:00): I apologize.

Basically, a proposal I wrote got accepted, and I sort of jumped the gun on updating every tag everywhere before adequately notifying developers of the change. Here is the wiki page for the tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway

In hindsight, I should have at-least put this in the weeklyOSM.
colgza (2021-04-22 00:32:51+00:00): If you would like, I'll revert the changesets.
tjburne (2021-04-22 00:38:25+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply, leave it for now as it makes sense I am just confirming with our software developer how hard it is to update on their end.

Thanks, 
Tim
tjburne (2021-04-23 03:14:33+00:00): Hi, Sorry to message again - I noticed today that the Busway has actually disappeared now, do you know if that was to do with the tag changes? I can't see any other history as to why it would have vanished haha - it was there yesterday gone today (in particular the SEB).

Thanks, Tim
colgza (2021-04-23 03:37:13+00:00): Hello.

The standard tile layer has not yet been updated to support the new tagging scheme, and instances of `highway=busway` will not render until it does.

The reason why it might have "vanished overnight" is that the cached map tiles in your browser were probably cleared and replaced with the updated tiles.
colgza (2021-04-23 03:39:28+00:00): Please do note that it would be incorrect to replace `highway=busway` with `highway=service` or another value to force them to render.
tjburne (2021-04-23 03:40:43+00:00): Hey, Thanks for your reply - OK that makes sense - do you know when the new tagging scheme is getting updated? Sorry for all the questions (I only do very basic editing obviously haha).
Thanks,
Tim
colgza (2021-04-23 03:41:34+00:00): Here is the relevant issue:

https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4226
tjburne (2021-04-23 03:47:20+00:00): Thanks :)
tjburne (2021-04-28 00:01:11+00:00): Hi, I noticed on the links you provided is it now proposed that you are switching back? I am trying to follow what is going on as best as I can.

Thanks
colgza (2021-04-28 00:21:03+00:00): I'm not sure what you are asking.
tjburne (2021-04-28 00:24:30+00:00): Are you still pursuing this updated flag or can I revert the QLD Busways back - Me and my teammates haven't been able to use our planning software for a week now so I just need to understand what is going on.
colgza (2021-04-28 00:46:32+00:00): Well, here's what's going on as of right now:

I am still pursuing trying to get `highway=busway` to, but the developers of the standard tile layer would rather not render it until it gains a level of large-scale adoption. Until then, busways tagged with `highway=busway` will remain invisible.

This puts me into a catch-22, where it is difficult to adopt a tag if the standard tile layer does not render it. 

In other words, there is no set date for which `highway=busway` will render properly in Carto. Furthermore, there is no set date that `highway=busway` will work with the software that you are using.

Because of this and for the sake of practicality, I have decided to revert my own changesets.
colgza (2021-04-28 00:51:49+00:00): I apologize for the trouble I have caused you and your team.
tjburne (2021-04-28 03:04:33+00:00): No worries - and yes that's what I was reading too - they wont update the map to render until people use it, but why would people use it if it doesn't render. Hopefully one day they figure it out. Thanks for providing the info, as I said this was all a bit over my head haha
clay_c (2021-04-19 19:19:49+00:00): Reverted. Please use more meaningful comments than "cheverly" so other mappers know what you've done and why.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103219191
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-03 10:12:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104045078 where the changeset comment is: revert changes from new MapperNews account that was created to circumvent a block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4982
portalaventura (2021-04-17 16:11:58+00:00): Boas-vindas mile123, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Parzelle13 (2021-04-20 22:38:05+00:00): Ganz sicher das es so stimmt? Als ich dort letztes Jahr vorbei gefahren bin, existierte er dort nicht, sondern befand sich immer noxh an der Kreuzung Straße Am Berg am Sportplatz.

Diesen Fehler habe ich dem RadverkehrsnetzNRW gemeldet.
Sollte das geändert worden sein, müssten allerdings auch die entsprechenden Routen angepasst werden.
Geomaplex (2021-04-21 10:57:15+00:00): Ich war vor kurzem vor Ort. Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass der KP an dieser Stelle ist. Ich sehe, dass 76 bisher Nahe des Sportplatz eingetragen ist. Vielleicht wurde er im Zuge der Sanierung der Bahnstrecke Aachen-Jülich verlegt?
Parzelle13 (2021-04-21 20:01:26+00:00): Nein wurde er nicht, diese bin ich ja danach abgefahren.
Parzelle13 (2021-04-21 20:11:41+00:00): Werde mir das Morgen vor Ort ansehen.
Ludhiana (2021-04-17 16:20:45+00:00): Your quality of mapping is already impressive!
Pressing "Q" may further straighten a building; I would do it e.g. on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931774596
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-03 10:12:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104045078 where the changeset comment is: revert changes from new MapperNews account that was created to circumvent a block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4982
user_617687 (2021-04-21 09:29:30+00:00): Il doit être taggé historic=tank et non memorial.
user_617687 (2021-04-21 09:42:38+00:00): Le lieutenant Jean de LOISY était le chef de char, le memorial doit porter le nom du char et non le nom de chef de char.
Minh Nguyen (2021-11-21 01:53:14+00:00): Are these county roads actually ever referred to by prefixed route numbers like “CR 600 E”? I’m afraid you might’ve copied some mistaken tagging I did years ago in counties to the south. I even blithely ignored the north–south part of the street names because they didn’t fit my mental model of how route refs worked. These street grid–based numbered county roads should just be named, unless there’s a clear reason why they should be modeled as routes too.

For context, I brought up this issue in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2021-November/021466.html . Please weigh in there with your observations if you can.
clay_c (2021-11-21 16:50:58+00:00): These roads are variably signed as "CR 600 E" or simply "600 E". I can see the rationale for removing the route relations. I'll pop in on the mailing list.
Parzelle13 (2021-04-20 22:31:02+00:00): Sicher das dieser Knotenpunkt hier existiert? Im Radverkehrsnetz NRW existiert er dort nicht. https://radservice.radroutenplaner.nrw.de/rrp/nrwrvn/cgi?lang=DE

Wenn er neu angelegt wurde, befindet er sich bestimmt nicht in der Botanik (dort stehen üblicherweise zugehörige Wegweiser) sondern immer an Wegkreuzungen oder -einmündungen. 

Wie man so was richtig Einträgt siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Knotenpunktsystem_radrevier.ruhr

oder bereits existierende richtige Einträge als Beispiel ansehen.
Geomaplex (2021-04-21 10:37:10+00:00): Hallo Parzelle13! Ich denke der Knotenpunkt wurde im Rahmen der Sanierung der Bahntrasse Aachen-Jülich dort neu angelegt. Ich werde ihn entsprechend der wiki-Seite noch anpassen, danke für den Hinweis.
Geomaplex (2021-04-21 10:48:19+00:00): Ich habe nochmal drüber geguckt und sehe keinen Fehler im Tagging. Der Knotenpunkt befindet sich auch an der Wegkreuzung (evtl sind die Wege auf der Radfahrerkarte bei dir noch nicht aktualisiert).
Ich habe aber den Punkt noch in die KPN-Relation hinzugefügt und den Wegweiser als Node ergänzt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103333140
Parzelle13 (2021-04-21 20:10:16+00:00): Dort befand lediglich ein Wegweiser einen Knotenpunkt Würfel auf dem Mast war dort, nach dem Ausbau der Bahntrasse, nicht vorhanden.
Die Bahntrasse ist ja auch kein Bestandteil des KPN. Die dort entlanglaufende Route 62-69 wäre sonst ja eben falls zu überarbeiten.
Werde mir die beiden Stellen noch mal erneut ansehen, da ich in der Nähe wohne.
FraukeLeo (2021-05-16 12:44:04+00:00): Hi didi09, du hast zwei Gebäude als tourism=alpine_hut getaggt. Das sind aber mit Sicherheit keine bewirtschafteten Berghütten abseits der Zivilisation, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut . Falls jeweils ein Unterstand gemeint war, der wird amenity=shelter getaggt.
didi09 (2021-05-19 11:14:27+00:00): Hallo FraukeLeo, danke für deine Anregung. Beide Gebäude sind verschlossene Grillhütten die man mieten kann und keine offenen Unterstände. Diese als Shelter zu kennzeichnen finde ich noch weniger passend . Ev. hast du eine Idee wie so etwas besser gekennzeichnet werden könnte? LG didi09
FraukeLeo (2021-05-21 12:52:37+00:00): Dafür gibts tatsächlich nichts 100% passendes. Ich würde building=hut, amenity=bbq, fee=yes, access=private taggen, der Name kann dann bleiben. Wenn du willst, noch "description=kann bei der Gemeinde gemietet werden" oder so was.
Craftycockney (2021-12-28 20:18:18+00:00): I haven't got local knowledge but this feature may be causing walking routing errors. As neither linking paths are cycle paths I am going to change this to a path which allows walking and cycling
woodpeck_repair (2021-05-03 10:12:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104045078 where the changeset comment is: revert changes from new MapperNews account that was created to circumvent a block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4982
Tolstoi21 (2021-04-19 08:44:37+00:00): Hei! Tyynenmerenkatua sivuavat pyörätiet ovat tosiaan yksisuuntaisia, mutta Jätkäsaarenlaiturin vieressä kukeva (ainakaan itäpuolelta kulkeva pyörätie) ei ole. Pyöräilin tätä kautta itse viimeksi kaksi päivää sitten, ja Hietalahdenrannasta Jätkäsaarenlaiturille kääntyvällä pyörätiellä on asfaltissa hyvin haalea pyörän merkki, joka osoittaa kulkusuunnaksi Jätkäsaaren.