piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-11-29 11:23:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114346182
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Frans S (2021-11-29 11:42:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
Buildings needs to be tagged as building=yes.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114347127
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
pangoSE (2022-09-09 10:04:18+00:00): Hej, det här låter inget vidare. Finns stigen så ska den ju med på kartan. Vill du återskapa eller ska jag?
EricThing (2022-09-09 10:08:53+00:00): Det finns alltså ingen stig, det var därför jag raderade den på kartan.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
olehz (2021-11-29 09:42:50+00:00): це дуже сумнівне покращення. видалити відношення, але продублювати паркани окремою сутністю. я відкатую, бо це ламає consistency
B_KSL (2021-11-29 10:42:12+00:00): hi olehz,
1-element relation makes no sense, multipolygon was invented for something else and that's just a mistake. I did not understand what you mean by duplicated fences. There are no duplicates. And 2 different lines, one on top of the other are ok. What kind of consistence was broken here? I have no intention of arguing but your variant is definitely not better. Sure you can turn that back. Your work, your choice, your shame ...
regards
olehz (2021-11-29 11:41:33+00:00): 1-element relation really makes no sense. But we have a different situation. There is a polygon, the fence covers some part of the perimeter. You destroy the relation and create 2 new entities: a fence and a polygon. What is the essence of the improvement? It is much more difficult to edit glue points. And it is much easier to skip a point, since they are now independent of each other.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
nevw (2021-11-30 03:49:04+00:00): Hi kohiti
you have have duplicated tracks that ere already mapped.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114348026
May I know the reason for this?
Is it ok if I delete the duplication?
Kohiti (2021-11-30 06:00:28+00:00): Yes that's fine.
nevw (2021-11-30 06:23:54+00:00): thanks, fixed.
You can use programs like https://www.alltrails.com/explore/map/new to draw routes for download as gpx or to show others a map of the route.
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-29 11:27:39+00:00): Hi Zimeone Dwisanggalaya Appa, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
G_P_J (2021-11-29 08:30:01+00:00): Cześć
wg geoportalu to jest numer 1022. Możesz to zweryfikować?

Pozdrowienia
Piotr
kubahahaha (2021-11-29 08:37:24+00:00): Tak, sam na początku nie chciałem tego zmieniać, ale napisał do mnie użytkownik który dodawał tu uwagi. 
"Numer został błędnie naniesiony w starostwie, sprawa jest już wyjaśniona Tak że ten budynek jest pod adresem Zawoja 2772 Mogę podesłać decyzję o nadaniu numeru, bo ważne jest dla mnie żeby kurierzy już się nie mylili".

Uznałem że nie ma potrzeby wysyłania decyzji o nadaniu numeru, skoro jest kontakt z mieszkańcem tego adresu, a zaproponowany przez niego adres nie jest duplikatem żadnego istniejącego.
uwagi:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2950355
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2949830
G_P_J (2021-11-29 10:23:17+00:00): Trzeba będzie zweryfikować zmiany w geoportalu za kilka tygodni.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Geo-Tobi (2025-03-31 07:29:14+00:00): Gleiches hier:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425947557
bollyboll (2025-04-01 20:06:44+00:00): Hallo Geo-Tobi, Danke für die Hinweise. Ich habe auch noch einen ähnlichen in der Nähe von Kastenseeon offen. Momentan habe ich sehr viel um die Ohren, ich kümmere mich aber gerne darum, wenn es wieder ruhiger geworden ist.
Grüße
bollyboll
bollyboll (2025-05-20 08:29:42+00:00): Ich habe es angepasst. Es handelt sich um einen Weg auf einem Gelände, das zu einem Wasserwerk gehört, deshalb sind die Wege mitten im Wald tatsächlich asphaltiert.
Rom1 (2021-12-02 16:49:50+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai à nouveau retiré le tag contact:street car sa valeur n'était pas le nom d'une rue. Merci d'en tenir compte.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2021-12-03 07:41:02+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'information.
Cordialement,

L'équipe DB
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
kuhni74 (2021-12-09 13:23:49+00:00): Was ist ein Selif-Point? Angenommen, das wäre ein Vertippser für "Self-Point": Was wäre ein "Self-Point"?
Fox7 (2021-12-10 07:08:55+00:00): Danke für's Anmerken. Es sollte Selfie-Point heißen. Es ist ein Großer Rahmen zum Hinsetzten mit Schloss im Hintergrund. Als "interaktiver Selfie Point" wird er auf einer Übersichtstafel westl des Schlosses beschrieben.

Ich ändere den Namen gleich.
kuhni74 (2021-12-10 09:19:40+00:00): Merci, auf "Selfie-Point" wäre ich natürlich nicht gekommen ;-)
Frans S (2021-11-29 11:39:20+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
You did not tag the buildings you mapped.
Each building needs to be tagged as building=yes.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114350347
limes11 (2021-12-02 22:30:33+00:00): Hi Maik,

wenn hier nicht mehr gebaut wird, dann entferne bitte sämtliche "construction"-Tags. Ich hatte das im letzten Changeset angemerkt, aber irgendwie sind die immer noch da.

Es ist kein Routing für Autos möglich, so lange construction-Tags auf diesen Wegen zu finden sind.

VG, Limes
MxxCon (2021-11-30 01:00:50+00:00): Btw, these are not exactly buildings...I'm not exactly sure what they are but this is what they look like https://imgur.com/DRu9r8U
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114351076
BCNorwich (2021-11-29 09:52:05+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Small problem, you've inadvertently changed the name of Alma Park Road to "Holscot Fluoroplastics Ltd". Not to worry I've reverted the change.

I'm not able to pinpoint your premises, can you say where it is please? Or perhaps zoom in and place a note exactly on the building (notes can be made from the icon on the right hand side of this page). I could then map it for you if you wish, please respond by commenting here.

Regards Bernard.
Holscot Fluoroplastics Ltd (2021-11-29 10:04:35+00:00): Hi Bernard, thanks for your help.

I've added a note, but I'm not sure if you could see it?
Anyway, here is the exact location.

52.9261200, -0.6046200
BCNorwich (2021-11-29 10:30:35+00:00): Please see the comment on your note. You can activate the notes layer (to see them displayed) via the layers icon at the right of this page.

Regards Bernard.
osmviborg (2021-11-29 09:32:11+00:00): 'footway' er bedre
user_5359 (2021-11-30 13:52:23+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of key wheelchair_access. Did you know the key wheelchair (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wheelchair).
Special question: what means wheelchair_access=wheelchair_access (seems to note an empty value)
PaoloLombardi (2021-11-30 10:58:19+00:00): Buondì
Quella che tu definisci "E' una strada" in realtà fino a quest'estate (ultima mia verifica sul campo) "era una strada" poiché distrutta e sparita dall'alluvione dell'Ottobre 2020. Pertanto sei sicuro che i lavori di ricostruzione in corso siano terminati (attualmente l'accesso in zona Scarrone è ancora chiuso) con il nuovo layout stradale da ritracciare sul posto? Altrimenti lo riporto alla condizione di come l'ho lasciata mappata.
Stessa cosa vale per l'accesso al vallone di Rio Borello lì vicino. Saluti.
user_3626133 (2021-12-01 06:33:16+00:00): O, ci ero passato scendendo dal Pizzo d'Ormea, ma prima della tempesta Alex. Non si passa nemmeno a piedi?
PaoloLombardi (2021-12-01 17:44:35+00:00): Ok quindi riporto a "linea" la strada. Per tale motivo invito a leggere bene tutti i dati nei tags tra cui ho specificato appunto la data della "distruzione".
Quest'estate la vecchia strada è stata ricostruita solo fino a "Stalla Rossa".  Per quanto riguarda la percorribilità a piedi se non c'è un tracciato creato ad hoc è inutile tracciarne uno "improvvisato". Comunque un centinaio di metri dopo "Stalla Rossa" hanno iniziato una nuova strada sulla sinistra orografica del Corsaglia che sarà da verificare e capire se "bypassa" la parte rimasta distrutta.
user_2066394 (2021-11-29 12:22:40+00:00): Als letzten Schliff könnte man noch orthogonalsierenn/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen mi der Taste Q.

Das Haus hatte ursprünglich mal die Hausnummer 78?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2508642049
pbiel (2021-11-29 18:46:54+00:00): Hab ich. Glaub ich.
Zumindest WOLLTE ich. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
user_2066394 (2021-11-29 19:46:27+00:00): Der Wille zählt :-) Hausnummer kurz zurückgeholt.
sjk23 (2021-12-13 20:07:14+00:00): Thanks for changing that, not really sure how that happened!
Frans S (2021-11-29 11:24:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114353625
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-11-29 10:34:00+00:00): Dzięki wielkie za poprawki! 

Dodam że droga co prowadzi tylko do jednego/dwóch domów może być oznaczona jako podjazd.

Na przykład https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162694614 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162694945 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533028671 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007283918
sjodl_ (2021-11-29 10:36:54+00:00): Może, ale chyba nie musi? Ja osobiście, po przejrzeniu dokumentacji, oceniam jak bardzo 'publicznie' wygląda na satelicie.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-01 18:12:42+00:00): Jak jakaś droga jest podjazdem (jest to dojazd do jednego domu) to cokolwiek innego oprócz highway=service service=driveway. W edytorze przeglądarkowym się to jako "podjazd" pokaże.
flother (2021-11-29 10:02:36+00:00): Bad changeset message. I meant to say "Remove street name and number from name tag"
Circuit_Rider (2022-09-18 18:45:52+00:00): For the Potawatomi & Silver Lake Trail segment (912409008) between Silver Hill Rd and the service road to the parking lots, approx GPS coord. of 42.414786, -83.964902, is incorrectly tagged as "oneway:bicycle=yes". This segment is actually two-way for bicycles.
Greg_Rose (2022-09-20 17:32:59+00:00): Thanks for the info - fixed!
silversurfer83 (2021-12-03 19:43:23+00:00): Moin H--H, als Beschreibung des Änderungssatz ist "eingene Kenntnis" eher suboptimal, da man daraus erstmal null erkennen kann, was du da getan hast. Als Quelle (local knowledge) wäre es OK. Daher meine freundliche Bitte in Zukunft ein wenig besser zu beschreiben, was du getan hast, danke :)
H--H (2021-12-04 14:19:51+00:00): danke für den Hinweis, werde es in Zukunft verbessern!
Frans S (2021-11-29 11:19:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Your mapping quality is rather poor. .Also valid for your other changeset 114354957
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114354677
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-29 11:26:53+00:00): Should be reviewed and maybe reverted.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184084475

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Aranc (2021-11-29 10:20:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=education?uselang=en#Transition_.28amenity.3Dschool.29

"The amenity=school tag can stay until rendering support for landuse=education has landed in order not to degrade the map for users in the mean time."
BCNorwich (2021-11-30 09:02:51+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

OK, gentle review. Just a few things to query. 

Does Way: Albert Street (156959780) go through the middle of what appears to be a roundabout Way: 1007289480?

You've mapped Costa Coffee as a building and a POI.  OSM practice is "One feature, one OSM element". Thus I've grouped all data on the building to avoid duplication of data.

Way: Internal Road (1007289484), I doubt the formal name is Internal Road, it seems to be your description of the road and can be tagged as such. This road really looks like a road servicing the business, highway=service rather than unclassified. The road around the cafe is usually oneway, is this the case here? I've made a few changes except the oneway.

Is the circle Way: 1007289483 a roundabout? If so adding the tag junction=roundabout will automatically indicate it's a clockwise UK oneway road. (likewise with  Way: 1007289480).

Ought Way: 1007289481 be classed as a service road?

Lastly Way: 1007289479 is a duplication of part of the circular Way: 1007289480, I've removed it for you.

Need any help with the above please just ask by commenting here.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-12-08 13:29:48+00:00): Hi, no response so I've made a few amendments.
Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2021-11-29 11:11:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not  in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114355549
MarcoR (2021-11-29 20:52:12+00:00): Ciao! Come fa un edificio ad avere altezza nulla? :)
Se non sei sicuro sul valore preciso puoi usarne uno approssimato oppure, ancora meglio, indicare solo il numero di piani con building:levels : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:building:levels
A presto,
Marco.
Noen (2023-02-27 12:17:32+00:00): Hei!
På tross av kommentaren din så er dette ingen liten endring. I tillegg er dette en ren tilbakestilling av mitt tidligere endringsett, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112813516.
Jeg setter pris på at du går i dialog før du tilbakestiller et endringssett med en grei forklaring.
nevw (2021-11-30 04:54:20+00:00): Hi
I have changed some of the tags because shop=supermarket seemed unsuitable. I have also shifted the location closer to your depot as viewed a satellite imagery.
marczoutendijk (2021-11-29 10:51:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 113958089.
milet (2021-11-29 11:17:17+00:00): Änderungssatz-Kommentar sollte eigentlich lauten: "Kindergartenfläche erstellt"
user_2066394 (2021-11-29 11:07:08+00:00): Ist da aktuell noch Baustelle?
AndySchulte (2021-11-29 11:33:35+00:00): Nein, die Häuser sind mittlerweile bewohnt
user_2066394 (2021-11-29 11:36:30+00:00): Die Häuser müssen in die Karte :-)
rthik007 (2021-11-30 08:25:23+00:00): "HI MFaruqz,
I have changed classification of road from unclassified to residential
way 1007299463.
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114391766.
Thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114356155
MxxCon (2021-11-30 01:37:33+00:00): You edited 2425 intersections with turn restrictions in Denver? Based on what data?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-30 19:43:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 114415727, 114404745, 114410731, 114407543, 114413370 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting an undiscussed import in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5486 .
CeBe (2022-10-17 14:00:15+00:00): Hi, du hast mein Änderung aus Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100429562 entfernt. Das Gebäude ist ein Neubau, war daher bisher in den "Bing aerial imagery" nicht zu sehen.
CeBe (2022-10-25 08:25:00+00:00): Kannst du das Löschen rückgängig machen? Ich hab leider nicht die Tools um das einfach zu machen.
Mangobonbon (2022-11-09 16:38:37+00:00): Ich weiß nicht genau, wie man einzelne  Änderungen in einem Änderungssatz rückgängig macht, daher habe ich der Einfachheit halber das Gebäude neu verzeichnet. Es ist mittlerweile auf Sattelitenaufnahmen zu sehen, daher sollte der Grundriss passen. Ich hoffe das löst das Problem (:
CeBe (2022-11-15 23:07:55+00:00): ok, passt. danke ;-)
eggie (2021-11-29 11:36:04+00:00): Hoi DOT..

Goed om iets aan te passen zodat het niet ongewenst routeert.
Je hoeft je niet zo uitgebreid te verantwoorden. Gewoon priveweg Verboden toegang.
Overigens is Eigen Weg van een andere orde ( tag dan access=permissive)  en bij art 461 WvS access=private.
Is die hele straat Verboden toegang of alleen het smalle stuk aan de noordzijde? 
Mapse
eggie