piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2015-05-19 13:09:24+00:00): Changing mapxspeed values from mph values to their km/h equivalents seems very much like a mechanical edit.  Was it discussed anywhere so that local mappers who consume the data would actually know that the change was occurring?
flierfy (2015-05-21 13:05:40+00:00): What exactly do you want to discuss? I actually didn't change anything, at least not in terms of the maxspeed tag. All I did was a translation of values into a better interpretable format.
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-09 07:04:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33900557.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-09-09 09:29:46+00:00): I strongly disagree with the changes flierfy made: mph is the rule of the rails in nearly all of the UK rail network. I also cannot recall any FoI or similar request regarding metric speed limits on the ECML or the CTRL.
tyr_asd (2016-01-07 10:06:51+00:00): There is now some duplication in the paths from Langtalerjoch to Meraner Höhenweg: See http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/494026
geow (2016-11-12 17:09:27+00:00): Hallo sperlingskauz, zwei Wege, die du hier angelegt hast, überlappen sich im Verlauf teilweise: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344172724
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344172712
Lässt sich die Wegführung vielleicht noch eindeutiger festlegen und kannst du die sac_scale ggf. noch besser differenzieren.
Danke
geow
sperlingskauz (2016-12-17 20:42:59+00:00): Hallo  tyr_asd und geow, habe meine Changes aus 2015 nun rückgängig gemacht, da ich es auch heuer nicht geschafft habe, den Weg persönlich mit dem gps abzulaufen. Habe ein fixme ergänzt. LG sperlingskauz
geow (2016-12-17 21:45:46+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung, sperlingskauz. Leider sind weder in den OSM-GPS-Daten noch über den Strava-Layer GPS-Spuren verfügbar. Also vielleicht im nächsten Jahr ;)
naoliv (2015-05-26 14:16:11+00:00): Márcio, não sei o que aconteceu nessas edições, mas alguns locais acabaram duplicados (Brasília, SP, Brasil, nó da tríplice fronteira, etc)
Thundercel (2015-05-26 15:46:23+00:00): Estranho porque não mexi em Brasilia, que me lembre. Só mexi na fronteira do Brasil revisando segmentos longos acusados na validação do JOSM.
O JOSM quando voce altera o boundary do Brasil ele automaticamente altera o way compartilhado por outras relações boundarys, mas Brasilia não está nesse escopo já que não compartilha way com o limite do Brasil.
Thundercel (2015-05-26 15:53:00+00:00): Brasíla POI é o admin_centre da relação Brasil Boundary.
Se duplicou só se foi nele, entretanto abrindo o POI aqui no JOSM e mandando validar nada acusa de duplicação.
Onde está vendo voce essa duplicação?
naoliv (2015-05-26 15:55:39+00:00): Nos nós.
Por exemplo, o nó de Brasília que existia http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/34567423 e o que duplicou http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3509304990
Aconteceu isso com vários nós.
Mas estou arrumando isso já.
Thundercel (2015-05-26 15:59:49+00:00): Continuo não entendendo. 
Acabei de carregar aqui no JOSM a relação boundary do Brasil.
Comandando a validação dela não existe erro de duplicação. Existe sim, 111 AVISOS a corrigir sendo que uns 90%deles são de segmentos longos.
Continuo intrigado quando a duplicação porque quando existe o JOSM estampa o erro quando da validação
Thundercel (2015-05-26 16:03:02+00:00): Para aprender...

Se duplicou o nó de Brasília, por que o JOSM na validação dele nada acusa de errod e nós duplicado?
Thundercel (2015-05-26 16:04:22+00:00): Se esse nó é o admin_centre do Brasil ele deveria aparecer na validação do brasil ainda pouco como duplicado. Membro da relação duplicado.
Thundercel (2015-05-26 16:05:30+00:00): Por fim pergunto:

Quem vai arrtumar os diversos avisos do boundary do Brasil?
naoliv (2015-05-26 16:12:49+00:00): O nó duplicado não faz parte de nenhuma relação, mas o JOSM avisa sim.
Baixe essa área no JOSM http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-15.79372/-47.88196 e mande validar. Vai ter um aviso de "Outros nós duplicados - Nós duplicados (1)"
O JOSM inclusive corrige isso sozinho.
Thundercel (2015-05-26 17:29:22+00:00): Realmente esse nó está duplicado e acusado isso na validação do JOSM.
Só não entendi porque isso ocorreu.
O nó original é membro das relações boundarys do Distrito Federal e do Brasil.
A duplicação pelo JOSM não considerou essas relações o que já considero estranho porque considerar exclusão de objeto que faz parte de relação ele acusa.
Interessante mais ainda que não editei esse nós. Editei sim, ways do boundary Brasil, sabendo que esse nós de Brasília faz parte da reção, mas nada foi alterado nele.
Pelo visto o JOSM alterou os ways do boundary e no salvamento duplicou o nó sem considerar que ele na duplicação, deveria também receber a tag admin_centre da relação. 
Será um BUG no JOSM?
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-09 07:14:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33900557.
flierfy (2015-09-09 12:52:51+00:00): What you have done now is sheer vandalism. You don't mind being reported, do you.
trigpoint (2015-09-12 12:08:16+00:00): How is reverting an incorrect, and undiscused edit vandalism?
Speed limits on UK railways, like roads,  are signed in mph.
ndm (2015-05-11 23:12:15+00:00): I think the grit bin's accidentally been "snapped" to the junction?
ndm (2015-05-11 23:46:32+00:00): My bad -- disregard the above
SomeoneElse (2015-05-12 10:23:28+00:00): Actually, I'm guessing that it doesn't have a name (and if it does it isn't "Grit Bin").  A tag of "amenity=grit_bin" will allow any map that wants to render it to do so - there's no need to give it a name too if it doesn't have one.

Oh - and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
ndm (2015-05-11 23:32:56+00:00): I had a feeling that the oneway didn't apply right at the Gloucester Road end? So the flats could get to their parking?
Thundercel (2015-05-13 15:27:27+00:00): Ficou duplicado o limite administrativo do Brasil com a inclusão do way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344183463
O limite do Brasil ali é o trajeto do Rio negro e está pereitamente configurado no way do Rio.
muralito (2015-05-13 15:47:56+00:00): Lee el tratado de limites y veras que ese tramo del limite es una linea recta convencional entre la desembocadura del San Luis en el Negro y Acegua.
Thundercel (2015-05-13 16:06:36+00:00): 
Sí, pero ahora permanecido dos admin_leval = 2 en la zona.
El JOSM es cusando límite de duplicidad.
BladeTC (2015-05-13 16:13:56+00:00): Corrigido!
ndm (2015-05-11 23:05:46+00:00): Not convinced this needs a name?
hormpanther9 (2015-05-12 02:01:47+00:00): Identifying benches is handy I think because some people like using benches, also it's handy if they are infirm
SomeoneElse (2015-05-12 10:25:20+00:00): (as with the grit bins) "amenity=bench" says "this is a bench".  There's no need to create a "name" for it too.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-26 05:40:15+00:00): The access road to the dump station is marked as private: is the station also private?
  Also could you remove the name tag, as only objects with a real name should have one?
Greying_Geezer (2015-05-26 13:02:56+00:00): The branching driveway leads to a Regional Municipality of York pumping station on the left and St. Andrew's Golf Club maintenance shed(s) on the right.  The former branch has a gate controlled by an proximity card lock system.  I'd concur with the choice of "private" by the mapper, but perhaps there is a better designation.
Headworks label removed.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-27 00:16:36+00:00): I'm still unclear: is this a place I can drive my motorhome and empty my sewage holding tanks? 

Also if there is a card system, then why not tag barrier=gate+access=private?
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-27 00:17:37+00:00): If the RV sewage holding tank station is private, then it needs a private access tag as well.  We don't want it showing up on a list of nearby facilities.
Greying_Geezer (2015-05-27 01:39:36+00:00): Re gate:  I didn't plot the driveway and hadn't gotten around to checking whether the gate had been mapped.  Next time I'm in the area I'll take note of its precise location and add it.
Re sanitary dumping facility:  access is to sanitary haulers ("honey wagons" in local parlance), not to the general public.  Gate is open during normal business hours and haulers are given proximity cards for night access.  I've added "access: private" to the dump station after considering "access: customers" and "customers: haulers" or "customers: commercial".  I'm open to other suggestions.
Greying_Geezer (2015-05-27 01:43:06+00:00): In previous post, replace colons with equal signs.  Sorry, it's been a long day.
ndm (2015-05-11 23:03:17+00:00): Not convinced that this needs a name? 

There's a German post http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Shmias/diary/34965 about a tree called Tree
hormpanther9 (2015-05-12 02:03:28+00:00): I don't understand. I tagged a grit bin here, because in winter people often look for grit bins
ndm (2015-05-11 23:00:21+00:00): Do these all have 20mph signs? I know a lot of cul-de-sacs don't.
ndm (2015-05-11 23:41:55+00:00): Was the postbox in the wrong place? http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/2/map.html?lat=51.458869&lon=-2.619061&zoom=13 seemed to have it as a good match?
hormpanther9 (2015-05-12 02:04:55+00:00): All roads in North Bristol have limits on them. They are all 20mph, unless otherwise stated
ndm (2015-05-12 20:52:18+00:00): No, they're only 20mph if signposted (30 mph roads don't have 30mph signs -- except on a boundary with a 20 mph one). The official ruling would be BCC traffic orders http://www.bristol.gov.uk/page/transport-and-streets/traffic-regulation-orders-tros but they probably don't have a good copyright to mix with OSM, so back to signposts it is :-)
skquinn (2015-05-22 00:14:29+00:00): Gas station and fast food should be tagged as separate nodes within the same building.
Setti (2015-07-25 22:24:27+00:00): Hey linda fanggidae,
I recently worked in the are where this changeset was made and i could notice there are some errors in the JOSM Validation. It looks as if you uploaded some buildings twice?! Is that right?
Changest 31007608 seems to contain almost the same nodes. I didnt check the whole changeset though.
Could you double check to make sure??
cheers Sebastian
DaxServer (2016-12-10 05:47:11+00:00): Hi, Jasvinder Kaur! I'm not quite sure why you have moved the node Kurnool into the Arabian Sea. I've corrected it.

Node - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/316416987
DaxServer (2016-12-09 15:25:33+00:00): Hi, Anupama!
Can you explain why the relation "ram nagar" has the node "Karimnagar" which has no sense? Thanks!

ram nagar - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5122861
Karimnagar - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2885001471
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-01-20 18:41:47+00:00): Co to jest power=low_pole?
PT-53 (2015-05-11 08:54:10+00:00): Hallo Tigger,
bitte gib künftig genauere Kommentare an (was wurde wo gemacht). Hailtingen gehört nicht zu Leibertingen.
Danke
TiggerGermany (2015-05-11 09:27:28+00:00): Moin PT,

war im Eifer des Gefechts, weil ich gerade eine Adresse in Hailtingen suchte. Bei einem Changeset mit einem einzigen Node sollte die Nachvollziehbarkeit aber auch so gegeben sein.
Aber ich gelobe Besserung. ;)

LG
lxbarth (2015-05-12 10:29:06+00:00): Please use JOSM and the JOSM building plugin for better building quality. Few of the buildings are parallel where they should be. With the building plugin, select one building, subsequent building will align automatically in parallel.

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools
Jose Riha (2015-05-11 12:29:03+00:00): aky je prosim zdroj Tvoj uprav - teda polohy a nazvy zastavok? dik, j
LUKy_BB (2015-05-15 09:02:02+00:00): poloha - osobne navstevy, StreetView
nazvy - cestovny poriadok
Jose Riha (2015-05-15 09:16:17+00:00): prosim, ten streetview eliminuj, kedze https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps
LUKy_BB (2015-05-15 09:19:55+00:00): StreetView pouzivam iba ak treba na uistenie sa o spravnosti miesta, nejde o "strojove prepisovanie informacii"
xbrandonx (2015-05-11 08:31:45+00:00): This is on the left hand side as part of the pavement going north on Florida rd. It is a designated bicycle path. is this the correct way to add it?
lxbarth (2015-05-12 11:27:54+00:00): Hey this building overlaps with the one next to it. Pls fix. Thanks, happy mapping!
Skippern (2015-05-11 14:29:30+00:00): Could you please explain what was damaged in these boundaries, a group of users have "tried to fix" this due to some problems with mkgmap, with extensive discussions on the Brazilian talk-br mailing list. I have tried to break this from the beginning of the process, as none of the users involved have experience in major edits on boundaries.
4rch (2015-05-11 18:44:47+00:00): In CS #30952748 (*) Thundercel splitted some boundary ways but he hasn't loaded all affected boundary relations into JOSM and so he created about 40 boundary relations in Venezuela, Columbia and Brazil with gaps (unclosed multipolygons) because the existing relations didn’t reference the newly created ways.

(*) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30952748
4rch (2015-05-11 18:51:49+00:00): *i meant Colombia, not Columbia ;)
Skippern (2015-05-11 19:00:09+00:00): Thanks for the reply, I have passed on your answer to the persons involved in these edits, and hope they understand the consequences of their actions.
BladeTC (2015-05-11 19:52:55+00:00): Ok, we understand our mistakes.
Nobody in Talk-BR acted recklessly. We are learning everyday to make OSM better.
Thundercel (2015-05-11 23:42:52+00:00): Hello 4rch,
really I broke some boundarys relations when I was correcting the long ways.
When I identified this error I tried to fix all, but apparently they were fixed by reverting changeset.
Supaplex (2015-05-11 17:16:04+00:00): 你好：

操場的畫法可以參考這邊
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2703970


:)
lxbarth (2015-05-12 11:24:07+00:00): Building in a building - please fix! Thanks.
blackadder (2015-05-12 08:18:04+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. I've reinstated the abandoned railway line routes as we do keep these in the data. I also did some further tweaks and updates in the same area. Hope to see some more contribution from you in the area? Cheers, Andy
lxbarth (2015-05-12 11:20:58+00:00): Hmmm - odd building shape. Can't see the this in Bing imagery. What is this based on?
lxbarth (2015-05-12 10:42:08+00:00): Hey there - there is a duplicated building here and in many other instances in this area. Check it out + please fix!
lxbarth (2015-05-12 10:56:04+00:00): I see this has been fixed now. Sorry for the false alarm.
lxbarth (2015-05-12 11:19:30+00:00): This building overlaps with the one right next to it. Pls fix - thank you and happy mapping!
PlaneMad (2015-05-12 12:56:55+00:00): Multiple overlapping buildings in this area. Please do a cleanup, thanks.
PlaneMad (2015-05-12 13:04:58+00:00): Sorry, looks like its already cleaned up, thanks!
user_5359 (2016-11-05 16:17:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
lxbarth (2015-05-12 10:38:54+00:00): Hey there - looks like you uploaded a building twice.
lxbarth (2015-05-12 10:57:43+00:00): Sorry, false alarm. This has been fixed I see.
lxbarth (2015-05-12 10:46:02+00:00): Hey there - there's a duplicate building at this location. Check it out and pls fix! There are also many other duplicate buildings in the area, please fix them too and happy mapping!
lxbarth (2015-05-12 10:59:45+00:00): Nevermind, this was a false alarm. I see this is fixed now.
lxbarth (2015-05-12 11:22:08+00:00): There are two buildings on top of each other. Looking a the imagery, this house is also not that big. Pls fix and happy mapping!
lxbarth (2015-05-12 11:30:22+00:00): Please map footprints not roofs! The building outline should be where the building meets the ground. Like here: http://cl.ly/image/3r1Q2Q080f3w

Pls fix and happy mapping!
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-12 21:08:19+00:00): Proszę o dodawanie opisów do wysyłanych zmian!
Chrysopras (2015-05-11 12:53:10+00:00): Vgl. z.B. dieses Foto: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flößerwiese_in_Wolfach.jpg
lxbarth (2015-05-12 10:47:24+00:00): This building overlaps with the one next to it. Please fix, thank you!
lxbarth (2015-05-12 10:58:50+00:00): Fixed now, never mind.
freeExec (2017-03-14 04:13:46+00:00): Не надо удалять теги public_transport
lxbarth (2015-05-12 11:08:47+00:00): This building is in the street.
Domiss (2015-06-11 08:18:03+00:00): Instytuty przestały istnieć na PWr pod koniec roku 2014. Aktualnie są katedry (których jest trochę więcej, niż było instytutów). Sensowniej byłby oznaczyć budynki ich kodami uczelnianymi (A-1, A-2,... B-1, B-2,... itd.) - to się nie zmieniło ;).
ajithkarunaratne (2016-03-25 16:25:14+00:00): Dear friend This edit is wrong there is no Arpico Super center here. The correct place is already properly marked. please do not edit with false data.

Ajith Karunaratne.
Henry H (2015-05-11 22:50:16+00:00): Hi, the correct tagging for proposed highways is described in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
I think I have fixed it for you. See changeset 31020858.
lxbarth (2015-05-12 11:15:14+00:00): There's a duplicate building here. Please fix and happy mapping!
Weide (2015-07-05 11:06:47+00:00): Bitte vor dem Editieren über die OSM-Datenstrukturen informieren. Aachen Hbf ist jetzt komplett kaputt. Es gibt dort keineswegs 15 Bahnsteige 6/7 und sämtliche Bahnsteigangaben Zugverbindungen zeigen nicht auf Bahnsteige und haben Aachen Hbf als Endhalt!
Weide (2015-07-24 15:24:23+00:00): Bitte bring den Bahnhof wieder in Ordnung
freeExec (2015-05-12 07:06:07+00:00): Если чего-то не понимаешь, не стоит это удалять. Ты воткнул тег и старой схемы и удалил от новой.
Валентин Кабанов (2015-05-12 14:35:59+00:00): Привет, я ничего не удалял. Заменил название точки порт на автобусная остановка, добавил проезды СНТ Степное. Хочу как лучше..
freeExec (2015-05-12 14:49:42+00:00): Угу, я понял, в iD почему-то эти два объекта не могут существовать вместе :(
Так что ты уж больше не немяй. Теперь это платформы для ожидания + место остановки = старые недо автобусные остановки.
pyram (2016-01-30 12:32:56+00:00): Bitte in Nürnberg nicht einfach nur vom Luftbild abmalen. Der Weg und die Überdachung waren zum Zeitpunkt deines Mappings seit einem halben Jahr bereits abgebrochen.
Außerdem machst Du dir anscheinend immer noch die Mühe, die Gebäude, die Geodreieck4711 (und woanders Taroc) mit HiRes-Bildern erfassten Gebäude nach bing zu verschlechtern (z.B. Way 32239488 am 04.11.2015).
Und nicht die Beschilderung raten wie bei Way 353843596
(Ist nicht böse gemeint, ist nur frustrierend)
aceman444 (2015-05-11 21:18:59+00:00): Dobry den, naozaj su tie polne cesty (track) vhodne pre vsetky motorove vozidla, ako ste zaznacili? Ak tam nie je ziadne obmedzenie alebo "prikaz", tak nemusite zadavat ziadne foot, bicycle, horse, motor_vehicle. Pouziju sa predvolene hodnoty (predvolene napr. v navigacnom programe).
Durko_freemap (2015-05-20 11:13:41+00:00): Zdravim Elo,
cesta 344279321 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31006308) sa prekryva s cestou 344279324. Jednu z nich prosim vymazte a v buducnosti budte opatrnejsi :o).
Durko
Kocvurik (2015-05-20 11:28:43+00:00): OK, ďakujem za upozornenie. Vymazal som. Môžem sa spýtať, ako mohli vzniknúť dve navlas rovnaké cesty a ako sa tomu v budúcnosti vyvarovať? Používam iD.
user_5359 (2020-12-25 18:12:45+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag mslink=0?
zimba (2015-05-12 05:10:27+00:00): Hallo Bojan,

Auch wenns sicherlich gut gemeint war, musste ich deine Aenderung rueckgaengig machen, da sie zu viele Fehler enthielt:

* Viele Wege waren schon eingezeichnet.
* Keine Knotenpunkte mit den anderen Wegen, wodurch ein Routing unmoeglich wird.
* Gehsteige werden nicht separate eingezeichnet (siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig)
* Punkte nur mit einem Namen, ohne anderen Informationen.

Bevor du mit dem Editieren anfaengst, informiere dich bitte, wie es richtig geht, z.B. hier http://learnosm.org/de/beginner/introduction/ oder http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bearbeitungs-Standards_und_Konventionen .

lg
naoliv (2015-05-22 17:54:03+00:00): Wilton, legal que você está colaborando com o mapa.
Só tem um pequeno detalhe: procure sempre colocar o nome completo dos locais, sem abreviar. Por exemplo, ao invés de utilizar "Av." coloque "Avenida"
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-09-26 15:00:00+00:00): end_date= jest niejednoznaczne i w tej postaci może oznaczać, że po podanej dacie obiekt przestanie istnieć.
Sugeruję używać construction:end_date=
Pozdrawiam
chillly (2015-05-13 18:30:30+00:00): I'm sure the farm here http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55464270 is not really called Peterfromtheeast
bigopenmac (2015-05-19 16:33:29+00:00): Похоже, что эта правка сдвинула железную дорогу. 
http://i69.fastpic.ru/big/2015/0519/18/da04a0ac2398b65698c94b5048ecfd18.jpg
Сдвинул на предыдущее место.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-07 18:46:15+00:00): material=AG? What is the meaning of this tag?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-07 18:46:41+00:00): Used for example at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3510426402/history
vendangeur (2018-01-07 20:01:44+00:00): More two years :  AG=Acier Galvanisé
Now : Galvanised steel or steel
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-07 23:42:51+00:00): Would it be correct to retag these lamps to "material=steel"?
vendangeur (2018-01-08 08:52:31+00:00): yes, at the time the list of materials did not exist, on these candelabra there are probably many  other errors
frosm (2019-04-15 20:34:37+00:00): Bonjour,
où cette vieux import a-t-il été discuté ?
je n'en trouve pas trace dans la description du changeset. pas de résultat avec une recherche sur opendata sur le site de la commune et le choix de nombreux tags est problématique. exemple :
c'est quoi une hauteur de 0 ? c'est une lampe posé sur le sol ?
d’où vient une hauteur de 0.007 413 546 3 ? une précision plus grande que le milliardième de mm, cela me semble invraisemblable comme mesure :)
ML et TF sont des modèles ou des fabricants ?
les matériaux : al ai at bo fo ?
un bonne partie des supposés noms ont l'air de décrire la forme du luminaire
D'autres sont encore plus mystérieux, genre 544S ou _Avenue
operator : n'y-a-t-il pas confusion avec le fabriquant (tag manufacturer et model) ?
Vinber (2024-10-26 17:41:07+00:00): Bonjour,
je pense qu'il y a un peu de nettoyage possible, la discussion est ouverte aussi https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/cest-quoi-material-sur-des-lampes/28309/4

material=Ag, AL, ... et autres tags ... 

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1TeI

garder la référence si la ville a encore la même ?
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-05-12 14:59:43+00:00): Большое спасибо за добавленные на карту леса!
chillly (2015-05-13 18:46:15+00:00): Does the footpath really have a sign saying ELM GROVE FOOTPATH TO QUEENSMEAD? The from and to is obvious from it's geometry. If the path does have this odd name it would be customary to make it mixed case not all caps.
Peterfromtheeast (2015-05-13 19:11:18+00:00): It doesn't but I work for a local authority and this is the official name of this path. I will change the name to mixed case.
cadsauxk (2015-12-16 10:56:00+00:00): Quando foi que a RJ-163 mudou de nome?
GerdP (2015-11-17 20:49:11+00:00): Hallo, 
was bedeutet es, wenn Du die "Schmerlenbacher Straße" mit
oneway=no;yes mappst ?
Auf demLuftbild sieht es nicht nach oneway aus.
Thoric67 (2015-11-17 21:09:11+00:00): Berechtigte Frage.

Das war keine Absicht. Die Straße ist zwar zur Zeit im weiteren Verlauf gesperrt. Aber Einbahnstraße ist sie definitiv keine.
GerdP (2015-11-18 07:55:26+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung, habe auch noch die weiteren Teile korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35397632
Dabei meckerte der Validator von JOSM auch über die Verwendung von footway=both:
footway=both is deprecated, use sidewalk instead (1)