piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skyper (2022-12-14 15:18:28+00:00): Hallo Andy,
bist Du Dir sicher, dass in Vogelbach nicht `addr:place=Vogelbach` anstatt `addr:street=*` verwendet werden sollte? Die Nummerierung läßt eher auf ersteres schließen und die Straßen "Vogelbach" bzw. "Vogelbacher Weg" sind jetzt auch nicht bei den entsprechenden Häuser. Z.B.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437883682 oder https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437880045

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
AndySchulte (2022-12-22 08:56:12+00:00): Hallo skyper,

danke für den Hinweis. Da mein CS über 2 Jahre her ist, erinnere ich mich daran natürlich nicht mehr, sehe das aber genauso wie du und habe es zu addr:place=Vogelbach geändert.

Weihnachtliche Grüße
Andy
skyper (2022-12-22 18:51:04+00:00): Hey Andy,
danke für die Änderungen. Hätte es auch selbst gemacht, aber nachdem Du es vor zwei Jahren eben von `addr:place` in `addr:street` geändert und als Quelle "survey" angegeben hattest,wollte ich erst nachfragen.
Habe die Hausnummer 9 noch angepasst. Hattest Du wohl übersehen.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
Firemix (2020-11-03 00:10:38+00:00): Ist das ein Import von Schulen gewesen?
uliwanne (2020-11-03 20:33:55+00:00): lange schmale Gebäude neben Sportplatz als Schule deklariert.
Gibt es Daten über Schulen?
xls oder gar shape?
landini (2020-06-19 08:00:26+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang,
ist der ED-1017 jetzt umplaziert worden? Vor 3 Jahren war das Schild noch weiter vorne im Weiler Zieglstadl.

Beste Grüße
Richard
opendcc (2020-06-19 15:00:21+00:00): Das Schild steht jetzt definitiv an dieser Stelle, ich habe das mit dem GPS getagged. Vor drei Jahren kann ich nicht sagen, wo es da stand. Aber vielleicht interessant: der (ältere) Datensatz der Forstverwaltung verortet das Schild auch in der Nähe der aktuellen Stelle.

Servus Wolfgang
Roadsguy (2020-10-02 16:43:38+00:00): Why did you add duplicate township/borough lines around Erie when the townships and boroughs were already mapped?
iWowik (2020-06-19 08:45:52+00:00): Чего за адрес "Машерова"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7630049561
улица, переулок, аллея, проезд?
Соблюдайте порядок внесения адресов.
Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
tux67 (2020-06-18 05:52:28+00:00): Hi,
kleiner Hinweis - die "0" in der Ortsvorwahl entfällt bei ITU für Fax und Phone https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86787481
eggie (2020-06-17 19:17:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review:  Maar wat is nu je bedoeling?
MVG,
Eggie
berms (2020-06-25 17:46:57+00:00): Hi Veska. I noticed that you changed a large section on the М5 to trunk, but it looks like there were some gaps leftover (way 280309383, way 749717229, way 599380183 for example). I was wondering if this was intentional or if they should match their neighboring classification?
Veska (2020-06-25 17:57:26+00:00): Hi. This M5 road should be completely Trunk, not Motorway. But, unfortunately, I don’t have time yet to finish editing.
aceman444 (2022-11-26 22:28:12+00:00): Zdravim, preco ste na budovy dali zdroj "kapor2" ked z katastra nie su? Sam pisete, ze zdroj je ESRI,Maxar,Mapbox. Inak su dost nepresne, idem ich vsetky opravit.
eggie (2020-06-17 19:21:40+00:00): Tip: Probeer bij je edits concreet commentaar te geven. Bv bomen verwijderd.
Heg aangepast... kaartjes automaat geplaatst.
gr eggie
Bij source=  geef je dan op local knowledge
eggie (2020-06-17 19:55:26+00:00): Beste INNAX  
Je vraagt om een review. 
We zetten in OSM geen bedrijfs- en adresgegevens op gebouwen. Dat hoort op de adresnode. 
Dus dat geldt voor de bakkerij als voor 
INNAX.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-17 19:56:40+00:00): INNAX is al getagd op de adresnode.
Dus kan alles van de omterk van het pand. Voor het Kadaster is het pand building=industrial .. yes wordt alleen als algemeen gebruikt.
eggie (2020-06-17 20:04:45+00:00): De adres- en bedrijfsinfo heb ik wederom van het gebouw verwijderd. Het is al coorect getagd op een adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-17 20:10:48+00:00): start_date 1960   wil zeggen dat het gebouw uit 1960   stamt volgens het Kadaster. Je hebt het veranderd in 2020? Je zou dan aan het kadaster kunnen doorgeven via een terugmelding  dat het fout in hun data staat.
MVG,
Eggie
pangoSE (2020-06-19 07:59:33+00:00): Tack! Ser bra ut :)
Dimacn (2020-06-25 04:44:52+00:00): Вы продолжаете вносить фейковые парки отдыха. Пожалуйста удалите. Трава с деревьями - это ещё не парк отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park
E de Wit (2020-06-17 20:26:57+00:00): Hoi Hendrik,

Ik weet niet of het een typefout is, maar een woonerf (living_street) is wettelijk "maxspeed=15".

-E de Wit
--Hendrik-- (2020-06-17 20:40:48+00:00): Goed opgemerkt, ik heb het aangepast.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Hendrik
Ser9ei (2021-05-21 23:46:12+00:00): Дмитрий, самих путей давно нет. В ОСМ мапим же то, что есть на земле. Этой дороги нет и вряд ли её будут когда-нибудь восстанавливать. Поэтому предлагаю перенести данные в https://openhistoricalmap.org и удалить из OSM.
iWowik (2021-05-23 07:01:00+00:00): Отнюдь.
Она очень хорошо прослеживается на земле.
Есть и насыпь и опоры моста.
Главное правильно затегировать.
Тут скорее railway=razed
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/railway=razed
Ser9ei (2021-05-23 08:12:09+00:00): Опоры есть, не спорю. Но вот саму ветку как-то не наблюдал. Дайте координаты хоть одного участка, где она видна. Кое-где она нарисована даже через существующие объекты. Надо тогда оставить те куски, где действительно что-то осталось. И ещё раз хочу отметить, что комментарий относится непосредственно к ветке. Руины опор точно есть.
Дмитрий Кудряшов (2021-05-23 17:10:26+00:00): Согласен с обоими:
1. местами ж/д "читается" на местности - на подходе к мосту с юга видна выемка с основанием балластной призмы, кюветы, откосы.
2. Конечно трасса читается не везде, wiki "советует" отмечать только "читаемые места...
Truchin (2020-06-27 08:21:13+00:00): Bonjour Florimond, 
J'ai l'impression que tu as tellement tagué l'aménagement provisoire qu'à ma connaissance, aucun logiciel de rendu ou de calcul d'itinéraire ne peut prendre en compte l'aménagement. Ne serait il pas préférable de faire un way distinct ?

Bonne continuation

Thomas
Florimondable (2020-06-27 11:36:22+00:00): Salut,
Pas sûr de comprendre la question.
Pour le rendu il y a CyclOSM https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=16/48.8813/2.2458/cyclosm
pour le routage il y a Geovélo (et tous les autres routeurs, normalement j'ai taggué en utilisant le tagging habituel).
Si tu parles de la partie bidir, effectivement elle aurait pu être tracé en way distinct.
Change ça si tu le souhaites.
Florimondable (2020-06-27 11:40:10+00:00): Geovelo arrive à l'utiliser https://www.geovelo.fr/paris/route?b=48.884007,2.254354,48.876740,2.238904&from=2.246425,48.881658&to=2.246575,48.885630
même si je comprend pas pourquoi il veut pas paser dans la contre allée avant
Truchin (2020-06-30 08:13:24+00:00): Bon bah tant mieux si c'est pris en compte à présent.

Thomas
mxooc (2020-08-23 23:22:06+00:00): Hello, why does amazon.com nitro north hanging in the air? This building is certainly built up from the ground.
You can refer this: http://web6.seattle.gov/dpd/edms/GetDocument.aspx?id=5580244
mxooc (2020-08-23 23:29:35+00:00): (As page 57 or 58)
literan (2020-06-18 18:14:23+00:00): не стоит придумывать названия от балды
lemos (2020-06-19 09:42:30+00:00): Данная территория арендуется Икеей.
literan (2020-06-19 11:35:06+00:00): для "арендуется" ставьте тег operator (и "Икеа", а не "Икея").

Тег name - для имен собственных
lemos (2020-06-20 13:37:49+00:00): ок, спасибо!
Glassman (2020-06-17 23:35:03+00:00): I haven't seen the building since it was finished. The skyway - is it an actual skyway or does it go to the ground level? If it's an actual skyway, then it should contain a layer=1 to allow sidewalks, paths, etc to go under the skyway. Great work BTW!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86791219
Norah Jones (2020-07-11 09:32:51+00:00): May I ask, what you've changed here?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
literan (2020-06-18 18:12:24+00:00): это здание было построено как станция. Тег building отражает именно то, для чего здание было возведено (для текущего использования используйте building:use). Откачу.
lemos (2020-06-19 09:36:01+00:00): ключем train_station обычно обозначаются вокзалы. В данном случае это не вокзал, а станция.
literan (2020-06-19 11:31:32+00:00): Вы неправы.

Станция это раздельный пункт на железной дороге с путевым развитием, совокупность путей и строений. 

Вокзал - это здание для пассажирского обслуживания на железнодорожной станции, независимо от размера.

По вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dtrain_station применяется для "A building used to access a railway station."
lemos (2020-06-20 13:37:02+00:00): Подскажите тогда, пожалуйста, как идентифицировать центральные городские вокзалы?
literan (2020-06-20 22:44:14+00:00): не знаю, может, по нахождению близко к центру? )
DressyPear4 (2020-06-18 07:34:38+00:00): Olá, ao invés de deletar a via, clique com botão direito do mouse em cima do ponto e selecione "desgrudar", assim evita perder o histórico feito por outro mapeador.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86791869
Pt873 (2020-06-18 08:23:11+00:00): Ok! Confesso que agora não me recordo exatamente qual via deletei, mas vou ficar atento nas próximas vezes, obrigado!
Karol_S (2020-10-08 20:26:11+00:00): Z tego co mi wiadomo, tutaj były wojska radiotechniczne, nie rakietowe.

Skąd informacja o zamknięciu obiektu? Chyba nie jest już od kilkunastu lat w posiadaniu wojska?
Sinkhouse (2020-10-08 21:44:39+00:00): Nie wiem w czym posiadaniu jest ten obiekt teraz ale faktem jest został ogrodzony, nowa siatka na całym obwodzie, i obecnie nie ma możliwości wejść na ten teren.
literan (2020-06-18 18:09:57+00:00): Добрый день. А почему убрали теги совмещенной велодорожки, ее ликвидировали? На 2018 она еще была https://www.google.ru/maps/@55.6329852,37.5618539,3a,75y,71.13h,96.13t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipPs0AeRUp_ujNC3yHV9foZsGaqR8E2VxuhkGiO9!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipPs0AeRUp_ujNC3yHV9foZsGaqR8E2VxuhkGiO9%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi1.0496504-ya288.71704-ro1.2281371-fo100!7i5376!8i2688
lemos (2020-06-19 09:40:49+00:00): На данном участке нет велодорожки. Там только грунтовая дорожка, в начале которой знак, что она пешеходная:
https://www.google.ru/maps/@55.6358497,37.5518103,3a,41.9y,294.97h,96.75t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sAF1QipN46tPWKV1gaorGozEY44CKoZJi3rECwz7uo2uw!2e10!7i5376!8i2688
literan (2020-06-19 11:33:40+00:00): понял, ОК.
mikini (2020-09-02 08:58:18+00:00): Hejsa.
Tak for opmærksomheden, og beklager de ekstra "addr:*" tags.

Det er mobil-applikationen Vespucci der har en meget fin, i hvert fald hvis man ikke har fuld adressedækning som i DK, og automatisk "address prediction"[1]. Selvom jeg har deaktiveret den så meget som muligt, formår den indimellem at få sat nogle tags.
-- 
Mikkel

[1]: https://vespucci.io/help/en/Property%20editor/#add-address-tags
Jørn-osm (2020-09-03 21:57:32+00:00): Er funktionen slået fra, men den alligevel tilføjer tags, så lyder som en fejl for mig. Egentlig burde denne funktion altid være slået fra i Danmark.
eggie (2020-06-18 05:00:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
bradrh (2021-03-26 19:20:56+00:00): Why did you change this to private?  I was just there.  No signs, and plenty of people hiking or biking.
eggie (2020-06-18 05:04:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Saulw7 (2020-06-17 22:44:12+00:00): Bien Tomás.
eggie (2020-06-18 05:43:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. De schuur komt inderdaad niet overeen met de data van het Kadaster.
Is er ooit wat nieuws neergezet.
Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen naar de BAG, want anders komt de oude vorm gewoon weer terug met een periodieke update.
Terumelding kun je hier doen. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=rijksstraatweg%2063%20ri&resultOffset=0&objectId=0597100000223715&geometry.x=100557.29499573&geometry.y=429055.49299851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0597100000223715


MVG,
Eggie
carfog81 (2020-06-24 18:01:32+00:00): Hola, por favor tener cuidado con las relaciones. En esta edición dañó una relación del tipo ruta (bus). ya hice las correcciones del caso.
Dimacn (2020-06-18 18:21:50+00:00): 1. Объект типа leisure=park - это парк отдыха, и не обозначает растительность. Пожалуйста переделайте назад на natural=wood . 2. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Пожалуйста удалите названия из name
jemily1 (2020-06-21 17:04:55+00:00): he visto que en las etiquetas de esta calle has puesto shared lane en carril izquierdo y carril derecho; la calle es de sentido único tanto para coches como para las bicis; quiero hacer lo mismo en Calle Roque Chabas, también ciclocalle paralela a esta calle, que va en sentido contrario a esta ¿pongo las mismas etiquetas que aquí?
Jordi MF (2020-07-01 07:50:22+00:00): Sí. Realmente, la etiqueta que puse es "cycleway=sharedlane". Cuando el editor iD ve que has añadido esta etiqueta, en sus opciones predefinidias te muestra lo que tú dices: "shared_lane en carril izquierdo y carril derecho". Pero, repito, yo solamente añadí una sola etiqueta. Lo hice así porque esta calle es de sentido único. Solo en casos aislados habrá que diferenciar entre carril izquierdo y derecho.
Saludos,
Jordi
jemily1 (2020-07-01 19:38:35+00:00): entendido; en los próximos días empezaré a quitar la ciclovía de Camino Els Seguins, entre la CV-821 y Calle Practicante Vicente Blasco - dejaré alguna nota puesta indicando los sitios donde hay giros permitidos para bicis y prohibidos para coches
flohoff (2020-06-18 17:48:30+00:00): Moin,
das Monument ist ja spannend. Das mit dem access=private halte ich allerdings für unnötig. Am ende ist ja nicht das Monument beschränkt sondern dadurch das es auf Privatgrund steht oder?

Was ist denn das - Nur so neugier halber?


Flo
user_5359 (2020-06-18 04:45:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add leisure=golf_course to every hole. And I assumed you forgot mostly the tag surface=grass.
lesjones2201 (2020-06-18 04:57:18+00:00): Thanks for the input. I'm new to this. I used the landuse=grass for the tees and fairways because that what the tutorial that I watched said. Should I just include the leisure=golf_course on one hole (maybe Hole #1?)
artem95vlasovets (2020-08-05 06:52:11+00:00): Hi! You added a large non-existent road due to your revert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157525237#map=14/38.6131/-89.9039). Please fix this. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86793706
Anisa IRM-ED (2021-06-23 04:02:40+00:00): Olá, andré Edler Leal. 
Espero que você esteja bem. Encontrei uma rodovia cruzada com este corpo d'água (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/817022468). Você se importaria de corrigir esse problema? ou me avise se houver alguma atualização nesta área. Obrigado, bom mapeamento (desculpe, se não entendi, usei o google tradutor)
phidauex (2020-06-18 02:20:39+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! You've made a large modification to CO parks by removing the recreation_ground tag - this was established by consensus between a number of local mappers a while back to address some gaps in the protect_class tagging and ensure the intent of "open space" type recreation areas. Please revert your edits and discuss with the community, either in changeset comments, the mailing list, or the OSM-US Slack channel before making mass edits like this. Let me know if you have any questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86794921
phidauex (2020-06-22 18:01:25+00:00): Hi, did you have a chance to review my comment? If I don't hear from you, I will have to revert the change as a mass modification without consulting the community. Thanks - phidauex
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86794921
tekim (2020-09-29 23:45:27+00:00): @bkari04, I agree with @phidauex, the recreation ground tag should not have been removed without consulting the community.  In any event, these *are* "recreation grounds" as the public is allowed to run, hike, bike, horseback ride, etc. on many of these properties, all of which are "recreation"
Violaine_Do (2020-06-18 01:05:06+00:00): Cool @Yoann, welcome ! Great addition to OSM database!! Here is a few improvment you could have done : the date format (yyyy-mm-dd) see [1], and the source of your changeset (you could have put the data source here, instead of putting it on all the item of the dataset).  
But still, globally looks good, will check in details in the coming days, though. 
Thanks again and welcome in the OSM family!! 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:date
and
kartler175 (2020-07-04 11:48:41+00:00): Bitte keine Objekte (http://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%5Bout%3Axml%5D%5Bdate%3A%222020-06-18T00%3A00%3A00Z%22%5D%3B(way(4576777)%3B%3E%3B)%3Bout%20meta%20qt%3B) löschen (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4576777) und dann doch wieder als neuen Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817029468) esestellen. Dabei wird die Chronik des Objekts gelöscht und die Arbeit deiner Vorgängwer getilgt (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik)
Ausserdem ist durch die Löschung das Multipolygon verkrüppelt worden: http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3096378
edvac (2021-01-07 10:47:41+00:00): Hi,
I've seen you added lots of buildings on top of existing ones.
aharvey (2022-01-04 02:10:51+00:00): Hi, I surveyed this area and only found a lookout slightly north of the one you added (which I've now added) and didn't find any bench. The path you added went through a locked gate into the pony club so I wasn't able to check? Are you sure there was a bench there and the track you added is in the right location?
aharvey (2022-01-10 03:10:53+00:00): I've removed the bit of path here to match my gps trace and what I found from my survey.
BCNorwich (2020-06-18 06:41:03+00:00): Hi, 
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There were a few problems with this changeset/edit. The deletion of the original building also removed from the OSM database all the history recorded with the original edit. Far better to correct or amend the existing mapped features then you maintain all associated history of the feature. You also drew one building partially atop of the other. So I've reverted the edit back to the original state. Would you please make amendments/corrections to the existing building. Terrace it to make it two or three houses, then tag the addresses to each house. If you need help with this please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Mike Raust (2020-07-13 07:34:52+00:00): Dear Northfork,

there are same wrong building footprints, mostly round objects in reality like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817037428
May you please review the buildings?

Kind regards,
Mike
Harish Sudharsan (2020-06-24 13:53:05+00:00): Just curious, what is the source for the edit of the LAC at the Galwan Valley?
Retired Account (2020-07-14 15:09:43+00:00): This changeset removes various access=private tags, which doesn't seem correct given that the community is gated.
Aglis IRM-ED (2021-06-24 03:57:24+00:00): ola Filipe Alvarenga, isso é realmente um lago (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/817052257)? porque nas imagens maxar premium eu não consigo ver o objeto lago Obrigada.
Filipe Alvarenga (2021-06-25 02:17:45+00:00): Em maio de 2019 esse segmento de trilha dava acesso a um pequeno lago de águas paradas.
Aglis IRM-ED (2021-06-29 04:04:33+00:00): obrigado pela sua informação
pza (2020-06-18 02:37:36+00:00): Here are the plans from the City of Sydney, which are consistent with what was built based by a site survey. 
 https://meetings.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/documents/s11226/Attachment%201%20for%20TRAFFIC%20TREATMENT%20SHARED%20ZONES%20John%20Street%20St%20James%20and%20Woolley%20Lane%20Glebe.pdf
aweech (2020-06-18 13:08:24+00:00): Hi,
What do you mean by setting access to no for this way? People use it all the time, so is it something new that happened in the last few weeks?
durkie (2020-06-21 21:04:35+00:00): Hi -- I made have made a mistake here, but this seemed closed off? It's fenced off at the airport, has a gate at Indian Rock, and doesn't seem accessible from Massasoit (or maybe I missed it).
aweech (2020-06-21 23:21:46+00:00): Ah, on second look it seems like people just ignore the "authorized personnel only" signs and go around. From the Strava heatmap, it looks like people cut through near the Amazon building and leave the area at Massasoit Road. 

Still, airport employees are allowed to use it, and the gates do open, so access=private is more correct. I just went through and found all of the gates and added access=private between the gates.
durkie (2020-06-22 02:26:03+00:00): Perfect! Thanks.
bxl-forever (2020-06-19 09:11:40+00:00): Hello,
Why did you split footways inside Georges Henri station into several small identical chunks?  Example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817064493
I will fix this but before I do I would like to understand what happened or what was intended.
Thanks.
Thierry1030 (2020-06-19 15:03:48+00:00): Hello,
I don't remember that I split these footways into small chunks. 
I only remember that while I wanted to save my changes at Bd Whitlock I got the question/remark that this footway wasn't "crossing" the Bd Whithock "properly" (no connection or no tunnel or bridge). I added the tag "tunnel" cause I knew for sure it makes part of the underground premetro station "Georges Henri". Tell me if I did something wrong ...
bxl-forever (2020-06-19 16:05:21+00:00): OK, I see what happened.
The problem is not you, it’s the iD editor.  Even though those underground ways were properly labelled with level and layer tags, iD still believes there is a problem with crossing ways, and will automatically "fix" it by cutting small parts with tunnel=yes.  I don’t know why it split a long way into 7 small parts.
Don’t worry, I fixed it.  I’ve put tunnel=yes on everyone of them; it is not required but this will avoid any trouble in the future.
rivermont (2020-06-18 03:43:50+00:00): *ADDING WATER
aharvey (2020-06-18 08:30:55+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM. Could you please provide your reasoning for this change? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=nature_reserve says "A nature reserve is a protected area of importance for wildlife" which this aquatic reserve seems to match. This can be tagged together with the protected_area tagging, which covers more detail than nature_reserve. What's area=yes needed for? The fact that this is a closed way indicates it's an area already.
bowman_andrew (2020-06-19 00:11:51+00:00): Hi @aharvey, thank you for the changeset review. It originally seemed as if the Boat Harbour Aquatic Reserve was over-defined in comparison to many other protected marine area in Australia. 
However, I think you are correct. I have just come across this wiki, which standarises an approach for marine & terrestrial protected areas,      https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Collaborative_Australian_Protected_Areas_Database_(CAPAD)#Australian_Marine_Parks_.28formerly_Commonwealth_Marine_Reserves.29.
RicoElectrico (2020-07-20 00:52:13+00:00): Dzięki za dodanie - zamykam swoją uwagę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2224311 - ale dlatego warto je przeglądać, bo mogłeś to zrobić Ty :)