piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2015-04-06 21:17:07+00:00): Mange af de objekter du laver vil mange erfarne OSM-folk kalde "overnodede" og for mig f.eks. kribler det i fingrene efter simplificere dem. Der er i forbindelse med OSM flere gode grunde til ikke at bruge flere noder end højst nødvendigt. Se specielt pkt 1 i http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1
Hjart (2015-04-06 21:22:44+00:00): Iøvrigt vil jeg anbefale dig at kigge på JOSM's ImproveWayAccuracy function http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/ImproveWayAccuracy. Jeg tror du hører til dem der kunne have stor glæde af den.
SomeoneElse (2015-04-07 20:39:34+00:00): Hello - I think that something's gone a bit wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30019226 .  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177024003/history was previously the wall between Tissington church graveyard and the village green; it seems to have been replaced with a linear "landuse=grass" http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337016680 .  Is the wall really no longer there?  I've not been to Tissington since last year but I'd be very surprised if it has been knocked down?
ToeBee (2015-04-20 20:36:22+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Question: what exactly were you trying to do with this edit? The Go Map!! app seems to have glitched somehow and you ended up tagging a bunch of roads around Coventry as parks with the name "Bell Green Wildlife Conservation Area". We will work on cleaning up the errors but if we know what you were TRYING to do, it might help the process.
ToeBee (2015-04-23 00:26:41+00:00): Ok, I believe I have corrected all of the incorrectly merged names.
dieterdreist (2015-04-07 12:52:27+00:00): why was this fountain deleted?
trial (2015-08-25 22:02:36+00:00): Please DON'T touch the boundary at sea side except if you exactly know what you're doing.
The casdastre is NOT a reference in any way for country boundaries. Boundaries at sea are 12 MN from the shore, it is NOT the coastline..
trial (2015-08-25 22:18:52+00:00): Well, the comment is valid, but it's not you that set the wrong boundary level for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224452841.
trial (2017-12-22 18:37:18+00:00): corrected
Polarbear (2015-04-14 15:27:03+00:00): Please check this lake which is not (yet?) on Bing. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337044089

natural=lake is deprecated.

If it exists, please use natural=water plus and water=lake or water=ditch
kevjs1982 (2015-04-16 07:45:05+00:00): It's a new balancing pond that was made as part of the (ongoing) A453 widening works.  Have updated as natural=water / water=drain.  None of the construction work is yet visible on Bing so it should be treated as inaccurate along the A453 from the A52 to the M1.
NicolasDumoulin (2015-04-06 20:43:15+00:00): Mince, tu m'as grillé sur le chemin qui descend au pont du Diable. Le monde est petit en fait ! Merci
surveyor54 (2015-04-06 22:13:18+00:00): Ich sehe auf dem Luftbild eine Baumreihe und keinen Weg. Warum wurde diese Baumreihe gelöscht?

Gruß
surveyor54
thangelstein (2015-04-07 08:17:27+00:00): ich hab das als Weg gesehen. eine Baumreihe steht dort, der ertse Baum ist entfernt die Reihe beginnt südlich des Zuweg.
mueschel (2015-04-10 20:18:14+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier zwei merkwürdige Keys verwendet (lanes:backward_1, turn:lanes:backward_2). Das östliche der drei Straßenstücke sieht bei Bing auch anders aus, wurde hier umgebaut? Kannst du über die Änderungen nochmal drüberschauen?
sierra-uniform (2015-04-13 16:29:20+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank

Nein, da wurde nichts umgebaut. Ich war beim Eintragen nur leider nicht sorgfältig genug. 

Ich habe die Fehler jetzt korrigiert. Ich hoffe ich habe alle gefunden.
luiswoo (2015-04-07 15:23:32+00:00): Названия улиц пишутся без капса -- Екарериновская улица, улица Листопадова.
-off- (2015-04-07 15:44:30+00:00): Привет. Ок. Буду иметь ввиду. Самому это не нравится. Глянул на несколько нас.пунктов - везде было капсом, поэтому решил что это правило такое.
luiswoo (2015-04-07 16:30:36+00:00): Это где капсом? Есть понятие не рисовать под рендер...
Если понадобится с капсом:
http://openstreetmap.ru/#map=14/47.2117/39.6427&layer=p
Слой с сокращениями:
http://openstreetmap.ru/#map=14/47.2153/39.6743&layer=S
-off- (2015-04-07 16:35:19+00:00): )))) Понял. Это я просто приблизил карту в режиме правки недостаточно близко.
Darek-J (2015-04-06 23:32:36+00:00): Budynków nie powinno się łączyć z drogami, tj. nie powinny mieć wspólnych węzłów. Tym razem poprawiłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30028844
Dodatkowo polecam używanie podkładu Geoportalu zamiast Bing, którego użyłeś. Pozdrawiam.
robert (2015-04-06 20:06:58+00:00): Hi,

Try not to use descriptive "names". If a path is unnamed, just don't give it a name. (I've removed the name now). Other than that, a good first edit - cut-throughs are really important & useful additions to OSM. Keep up the good work.
Felix Schütt (2017-02-07 15:03:00+00:00): Moin,

es geht um die Straße "Kamerun Zwönitztalstraße". Ist da vielleicht versehentlich der Ortsname in den Straßennamen gerutscht oder heißt die Straße wirklich so? Ist nirgendwo sonst eingetragen, kann ich schlecht überprüfen.

MfG, Felix
Klumbumbus (2017-02-07 16:58:47+00:00): Da bin ich mir nicht sicher. Die Straße hieß in OSM aber schon vor diesem Changeset so, da hab ich nix verändert (nur gesplittet).
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-06 23:05:17+00:00): Kolego, przychodzisz w nieznane miejsce i zaczynasz od kasowania czegoś w pierwszej edycji? 
Proszę się zapoznać z zasadami: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632
HubMiner (2018-03-08 02:11:25+00:00): Hello, I think the right tag for closed Target should be: was:shop=department_store ; see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
5m4u9 (2015-04-07 05:59:30+00:00): Thanks for contributing in Bolivia. We don't have many local contributors and what you did helps a lot :)

You say "desert", no is "altiplano" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altiplano ;-)
naoliv (2015-04-07 10:59:59+00:00): Barão, de onde você está tirando os nomes das ruas?
Barão de Itararé (2015-04-15 00:11:26+00:00): No próprio local. Quando minha equipe vai para uma ocorrência já tenho o nome da rua e depois ela me confirma olhando nas placas.

São bairros novos, não catalogados por nenhum mapa na Internet, nem impresso você vai achar.
Skippern (2015-04-15 01:17:36+00:00): Se os nomes e de pesquisa proprio, poa tag source=survey nos changesets, grato
Barão de Itararé (2015-04-15 01:49:57+00:00): Onde fica os changesets?
naoliv (2015-04-15 15:17:43+00:00): Changeset é um conjunto de mudança. Quando você faz algumas alterações e salva, esse conjunto de adições, mudanças e remoções de objetos é um "changeset"
MarkusHD (2018-01-30 14:40:41+00:00): Access of way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250087113 has been changed here, foot=no makes it impossible to route to the Top Station because a little segment here is affected: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-36.49295&mlon=148.28998#map=17/-36.49295/148.28998
Was this really intended?
aharvey (2018-01-30 22:28:24+00:00): Whoops. I added foot=no because there are signs saying that track is for bicycles only, no walkers. However you're right about that short segment. Unless anyone else has better knowledge I'm happer for you to change that small section to allow walkers.
MarkusHD (2018-02-01 00:46:12+00:00): I'm away from home for some time and using Vespucci is too complicated for me for non simple tasks, so I leave it to you :) 
I didn't walk this route anyway, so I don't have surveyed it myself, only tried routing this alternative track.
MarkusHD (2018-02-13 11:27:25+00:00): I got quite comfortable with Vespucci and have just changed it, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56321245
eggie (2020-02-02 15:00:21+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen voor OSM, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. bijdeze alsnog  Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Mapeiro (2017-08-28 23:57:13+00:00): Hi,

This secondary highway you traced to the right (east) of União has a separate road for each direction of traffic? Looking at the available satellite images it seems to me that it's a single road for both traffic directions (no physical separation between them).
Mapeiro (2017-08-28 23:59:02+00:00): Because if that's the case (no physical separation) I think it should be mapped as a single way instead of two separate ones with oneway=yes
Mapeiro (2017-08-29 00:05:14+00:00): The ways also have the wrong direction. Northbound traffic should be on the right side and southbound on the left. You did the opposite.
wille (2017-08-29 01:28:30+00:00): fixed!
ediyes (2017-08-29 01:37:01+00:00): Hi there,

Thank for noticing this error. Mapeiro
And thank so much for fixed it, Wille.

Edith.
luschi (2015-08-28 22:07:39+00:00): du hast hier einige barrier=Schranke eingezeichnet. 
ist es womöglich barrier=swing_gate(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dswing_gate)?
bitte korrigieren.
lg
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-04-09 16:14:36+00:00): Здания около Межозёрного
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-04-09 16:12:08+00:00): Добавил здания в Уйском?
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-04-09 16:11:38+00:00): Добавил здания в Уйском?
zumd (2020-02-12 21:10:18+00:00): Ist das eine reguläre Bushalte? Ich kenne da auch nur die der Christianschule.
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-04-09 16:10:58+00:00): Видимо, добавлял дороги в Уйском
jambamkin (2019-12-07 00:58:22+00:00): Hello, thanks for this addition to the map. This node you added is missing any 'tags' and it is not clear from the name what you are adding. Is this the Golf club or Gliding club, or something else?
R David Newton (2019-12-10 18:24:32+00:00): Hi there, as you can see this is from some time ago now. The tag should be "Portmoak Gliding Club" and refers to the actual club house (there's quite a lot of other stuff on the airfield, so this is a useful bit of information.
jambamkin (2019-12-12 20:54:21+00:00): Yep, I thought it was a long shot leaving a note here, thanks for making the effort to respond. I've update the node name and give it a gliding club tag. I can't see the actual club house from the aerial imagery so if you were able to check the location and add the building as an area that would be great.

Thanks

James
mathieuS (2015-04-07 08:27:57+00:00): It is wrong to add a non-existing way though an area. Give a look at this discussion : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:area#Navigators. The example posted by Tordanik is particularly eloquent.
Xmypblu (2015-04-08 15:24:28+00:00): Насколько я знаю, в iD есть горячая клавиша "s" - она делает углы у зданий прямыми. Пользуйтесь ей.
А если планируете рисовать много зданий - переходите на JOSM
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=14850
http://josm.ru/
fkv (2015-06-28 18:38:46+00:00): Diesen Changeset halte ich in mehrfacher Hinsicht für bedenklich und ich schlage einen kompletten Revert vor. Z.B. wurde aus "Baierdorf-Umgebung" der Bindestrich herausgelöscht, obwohl er in amtlichen Adressangaben vorkommt. Auf viele Adressen wurde nur ein addr:country=AT draufgepappt, was ist keinster Weise eine "Adresskorrektur", sondern bestenfalls eine (unnötige) Ergänzung ist. Offensichtlich handelt es sich um halbautomatische Änderungen (siehe source=housenumbervalidator) ohne Ortskenntnis und ohne sorgfältige Überprüfung, die also den Automated Edits code of conduct verletzen.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-21 20:49:47+00:00): Just checking - are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33777910 joins http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266631527 here (in addition to the bollard at the east)?  It's not really clear from the imagery.
SomeoneElse (2015-04-07 20:51:07+00:00): I notice that you've joined Gladstone Terrace to the footpath to the south (as your colleague did in changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28255923 - see the comments on that).  When I originally surveyed it it didn't look like there was any public route onto http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227325669 - I'd have joined it if there was.

I suspect that the area would still benefit from a local survey though (and it's a shame I didn't spot this changeset earlier today - I was about 100m away from this spot earlier this evening!).
srividya_c (2015-04-08 05:54:35+00:00): Oh, Sorry. I found a footpath over there and didn't see any barrier like thing in imagery so joined those two roads. I have reverted the changes back. 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30055155 
Thankyou for your valuable feedback.
SomeoneElse (2015-04-09 13:06:56+00:00): Hi - I had the chance to walk past the end again yesterday, and someone's knocked the wall down that was previously preventing you from seeing behind the houses.  It turns out that what is now http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337594226 is not actually a road at all, but a gravel track behind the houses.  I've also amended the street names (and lack of street names) based on the available evidence.  Hopefully this will make things clear until someone does a proper on-the-ground survey.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30093567
srividya_c (2015-04-10 05:34:27+00:00): oh thats nice. But mapping is more accurate when someone does a ground survey. Anyway thankyou for making few more good changes in the area.
GerdP (2015-10-23 10:39:22+00:00): please review way 259883067:
Did you intend to change the name to "Nehoreka" ?
naoliv (2015-05-26 14:35:20+00:00): Ricardo, você alterou de forma incorreta a classificação de Macuco.
A classificação se dá pela população do local.
Por favor, utilize essa tabela para as suas próximas edições: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:place
mitidi (2015-05-26 19:09:07+00:00): Perfeito! Desfiz a alteração. Valeu pela dica.
Ricardo
AndreasTUHU (2016-03-27 14:57:05+00:00): Szia!
Kitörölted ezt az utat:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39622355
így ez a fordulási tiltás "féllábú" lett:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2444440

Nincs már fordulási tiltás a helyszínen, vagy egy másik útszakaszt kell hozzáadni a kapcsolathoz?
András
maxerickson (2015-04-17 21:04:18+00:00): There is some amount of agreement that the Great Lakes are to be modeled as natural=coastline. You can see here that natural=water was added and removed just a few months ago:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27063265

The relations also need some work. For instance, Isle Royale is missing:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146305732

Probably along with the many smaller islands in the area there.

I expect the natural=water on the Lake Superior relation is what is breaking the rendering at z13:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/48.0690/-88.5923

I think if you want natural=water to be the standard you should probably open a discussion on the talk mailing list, or someone will just come along and flip it back.
satri (2015-08-19 18:16:49+00:00): Thanks maxerickson, Clearly the tagging of water needs to be discussed and agreed upon by the community. We'd like to use OSM data in an operational context and we're having issues with the current inconsistencies with how the Great Lakes (and other waterbodies) are tagged. I'll see if it's worth trying to reach some kind of consensus (I suspect that will require lots of efforts, which I can't devote at this point, maybe later). Thanks -- Alex
GerdP (2016-01-15 06:28:55+00:00): Hi there!
Please explain, why did you change landuse=traffic_island to highway=traffic_island ?
robryk (2021-07-31 13:37:19+00:00): Ta zmiana dodała "kancelarię" w budynku szkoły społecznej. Czy nie jest to pomyłka? Wedle mojej najlepszej wiedzy kancelaria parafialna była i jest w samym kościele, w części za zakrystią (na północnym jego końcu).
maraf24 (2021-07-31 17:31:01+00:00): Skoro wiesz gdzie jest, to nie czekaj, tylko poprawiaj :)
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2020-08-10 09:41:39+00:00): Hi Giang Trần,
I've modified the highway classification (way-337192058) based on Maxar Premium Imagery geometry.
thank you
alex73 (2015-04-08 12:01:08+00:00): А навошты вы admin_level зьмянілі ? 4 быў правільны
romanshuvalov (2015-04-23 14:22:32+00:00): А это действительно велодорожки? Обозначенные синеньким знаком? Внизу у портпосёлка помню, и вдоль ул. Комзина тоже, а за другое - не уверен.
Galaktionov (2015-04-23 14:51:30+00:00): ну раньше это были не велодорожки, а летняя трасса для тренировки лыжников. называли роллерка. но дорогу убили пожары и транспорт, теперь там роллеров нет. есть велосипедисты. лесная тропа тоже не правильно. дорога то асфальтированная..
Galaktionov (2015-04-23 15:01:27+00:00): тротуар, который мимо лесопаркового шоссе, тоже был частью той роллерной трассы.. и по факту это не тротуар. а тоже велодорожка. http://share.mapbbcode.org/xqkiz
deleted_account (2015-04-08 08:29:08+00:00): prawie dobrze, ale 
1. granice administracyjne Sianowskiej Huty rozbiłeś na dwie relacje - trzeba to poprawić
2. do zestawow zmian dodawaj komentarze
3. do takich edycji powinieneś używać lepszego narządzia - JOSM i podkładu EMUiA. Można również użyc narzędzia Tracer aby uniknąć konieczności ręcznego przerysowywania granic
szali (2015-04-09 19:57:31+00:00): Szia! ele=* címkébe a "m" nem kell, csak a szám.
vajko1970 (2015-04-10 09:15:02+00:00): Szervusz!
Bocs, de nem értem pontosan a megjegyzésed. Arra gondolsz, hogy a magasság adatnál csak a számot írjuk, a mértékegységet (pl. méter-t) nem?

üdv: Vadász I.
szali (2015-04-10 15:45:42+00:00): Igen, a méter az alapértelmezett, ezt nem tesszük ki. Gondokat okozhat az automatikus feldolgozásnál, és rontja az egységességet.
trigpoint (2015-04-07 17:57:00+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, I think something has gone wrong here and suspect the node is misplaced. Bing imagery shows the road ajoining the water and no space for buildings that side of the road.
SomeoneElse (2015-04-07 21:32:51+00:00): Hi - I'm guessing that you've created http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337218669 to reflect some kind of personal route?

If that's what it it is, then the main OpenStreetMap database isn't the place for it, since there is only one map - everyone's personal routes would be shared with everyone else's.

As I suggested in one of the notes, http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ is probably the sort of thing that you're looking for - that would enable you to create a personal map just for yourself (and whoever you want to share it with) while not appearing on the same map that everyone else sees too.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-07 19:07:18+00:00): Przypominam o kalibrowaniu podkładu Bing przed rysowaniem czegokolwiek.
hh725 (2015-04-08 20:15:36+00:00): Completato percorso strada
SomeoneElse (2015-04-07 21:17:28+00:00): As you've spotted, some of the newly-added paths and tracks in here are duplicate and unjoined.  However, obviously broken geometry is quite useful at pointing out which paths in here need resurveying, which is why I've not tried to remotely "fix" any of the problems.

Also, seeing the user who added a particular path is quite useful at working out where it came from - one user added lots of paths without a survey from OS OpenData and earlier out of copyright maps.  Many of these ways don't exist now (the wood's been revamped several times - once when the colliery and railways closed, again when Go Ape and the cycle loops opened, and again now the link to Vicar Water's open).  Other users added the initial cycleways with varying accuracy (and the route of the main circular cycle track has since changed), I've tried to tidy the paths up based on GPS traces and a couple of new users have meanwhile been adding paths, some of which are duplicates.

Knowing which user added which path is really useful because it allows you to judge whether it is (a) just fantasy (b) probably in the wrong place, a duplicate or both, or (c) probably just mistagged.

If all of the ways in the forest were last edited by yourself or one of the Mapbox people it means when I'm sat in the middle of the forest looking at a Garmin screen I can't easily see what category a line on the map falls into.  There are over 100km of paths in here, poor GPS signal (lots of trees!) and a poor GSM data signal - when mapping here it's nice to have as much information as possible about the problems that exist.

Obviously you're trying to "fix" the map here, but I'd suggest that here that's not going to happen without an on-the-ground survey to weed out not only the duplicate ways but also the ones that are in the wrong place or are for former paths that have since moved.
martiensch (2015-05-15 08:56:49+00:00): Hallo Gluehbert,

Warum ist die Umgehung von Badbergen ein highway=trunk? Die Straße ist doch nicht kreuzungsfrei? Dann wäre es doch primary?

Gruß,

Martien
Gluehbert (2015-05-17 17:45:09+00:00): Moin,

ich habe die dortige Hauptverbindungsstraße auf Kraftfahrstraße geändert, weil es sich um eine solche handelt. Wenn die Straße damit gleichzeitig zum Trunk wird, war diese Änderung falsch. Die Frage wäre in dem Fall: Heißt Trunk auf deutsch Kraftfahrstraße und ist somit missverständlich übersetzt?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Björn
martiensch (2015-05-17 19:12:16+00:00): Hallo Björn,

Für Kraftfahrstraßen gibt es den speziellen Tag motorroad=yes (dieser Tag führt nicht zu einer anderen Darstellung).
Für autobahnähnliche Straßen wird in Deutschland der Trunk benutzt, siehe auch die wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk
Trunks sind in der Regel auch Kraftfahrstraßen, andersrum nicht unbedingt.
Ich finde den deutschen Spezialfall mit motorroad=yes selber auch eher suboptimal. In den Niederlanden gibt es zum Beispiel keine 'autobahnähnliche Straßen' und wird jede Kraftfahrstraße als Trunk getaggt...
Grüße,
Martien
Illio (2021-05-26 21:00:36+00:00): Zdravím. Čo znamená meno "ochrana přírody" na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337227366 ?
zvolsky (2021-05-27 13:11:00+00:00): Myslím, že to je nějaká novostavba (dřevěnka?) ochranářů, Správy CHKO nebo tak něco
Illio (2021-07-01 19:17:15+00:00): Ale zrejme sa budova nevolá "ochrana přírody", jednak to nie je názov budovy a jednak to ani nie je po slovensky. Takže skôr to treba dať do description.
will_p (2015-04-08 11:23:09+00:00): I have deleted the house you added, because all the houses on Smithfield Avenue have been mapped already, so it's just duplicating what is there.
Your contributions are most welcome, but please note that there is no need to add things that are already mapped. If you wish to change a name or add extra information, you should edit the feature that has already been created.
ToeBee (2015-04-07 19:01:57+00:00): Hi. Welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. It seems you have some questions about it? Please take a look at the OSM wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/

Also, you can hop on IRC if you want to carry on a  real-time conversation with some people: irc.openstreetmap.org

It looks like this edit just added an empty point to the map. I will remove it since it isn't actually mapping anything.
t_ja (2015-04-08 15:37:18+00:00): Ahoj, amenity=gym sa neodporuca pouzivat, vid OSM wiki. A cesta 337231747 ma nadbytocne body, z 17tich uplne staci nechat 6 a geometria sa vobec nezmeni.

S pozdravom
MiMiNo
olede4 (2015-04-10 17:07:58+00:00): тест
Hjart (2015-04-09 17:48:29+00:00): The road you made is really a track or path (unpaved). Right?
derArne (2015-06-03 13:30:22+00:00): Yes, it is.
Hjart (2015-06-03 15:00:50+00:00): Ok, thank you. I changed it while ago based on imagery, but had to ask just to be sure.
derArne (2015-06-05 08:41:43+00:00): Sorry, I saw your comment too late.
4rch (2015-04-14 23:36:24+00:00): Hi, it seems that you've damaged the boundary of Thornton due to your edits. please use an appropriate editor like JOSM for boundary edits. iD has no built in validator so you won't get error messages when you damage boundary relations.
4rch (2015-04-14 23:44:14+00:00): I've tried to fix it: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/112928
Hector Gordon (2015-04-07 20:10:56+00:00): Marine Communication Limited (MARCOM)
SomeoneElse (2015-04-07 21:41:44+00:00): I'd be a little careful trusting the Bing imagery here - it's around 2-3m out when compared with the underlying GPS traces previously uploaded to OSM (all of which you can see in Potlatch and JOSM but some only in iD - though if you're using Strava's iD then their point cloud would I suspect show just as much data as OSM's GPS traces).