piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheConductor (2020-07-02 18:15:29+00:00): Good morning,

As I was reviewing edits in my home county, I came across this change. First, thank you for your contributions to the area. I, like you, take great pride in my home and want to make sure that it is modeled as accurately as possible. I took the opportunity to read your bio and you mentioned that you hand model everything. I find that to be an admirable quality in the OSM community. Most, if not all streams and rivers that you encountered in this area were hand modeled by myself over countless hours ensuring painstaking accuracy. 

I did this not only for my personal satisfaction but for the benefit of multiple organizations that rely on this data which brings me to my next point. After conferring with contacts from the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, the BLM's Winnemucca Field Office, and the Nevada Department of Wildlife, the unanimous conclusion is that the classification of the "Little Humboldt River" is indeed a river. Admittedly, it does not always carry water but when it does, it maintains stream gauge levels appropriate with surrounding rivers. Many of these individuals have been observing and recording this data for much of their careers. As such, I will changing the classification back to "river" but with an "intermittent" tag on it as well. 

Thank you for your time. Best regards.
bdiscoe (2020-07-03 07:59:03+00:00): Thanks, TheConductor.  I defer to your local knowledge, although I did notice that the streambed in many places appears exceedingly narrow, so that even when water flows, it would not meet OSM's definition of a river, for those sections.  In any case, I am just very happy that this river feature has someone looking out for it.
DP24PH (2020-05-17 01:36:40+00:00): Change logs:
1. Extension of MMDA Bicycle Lane routing, including Magallanes to Ayala and Ortigas to Santolan
2. Foot traffic redirection to sidewalk per MMDA Anti-Jaywalking Policy and sidewalk separation rules (secured railings/mesh-type fence)
3. Fixes on City Bus routes per PTv2 guidelines

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Kindly comment down here.

Much love,

DEARPAUL24
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-05-19 18:53:46+00:00): Don't should we better map bus stops or PUV loading/unloading zones with a single node separate from the road? I'll fix again those for Ayala and Magallanes northbound stops (which I've merged with the existing bus stop nodes on a previous edit before this).
DP24PH (2020-06-17 11:12:14+00:00): For fixed-post Bus/PUV stops, the 'stop' node is at the stop_position, preferably the highway/roadway; while the 'platform' must be any portion of footway (if covered) or node (if uncovered).

Please be advised that as of current Bus Route Rationalisation, platforms at the median (near MRT) in PH-1/AH26/C-4/EDSA is mandatory.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-06-17 16:19:37+00:00): You can have a stop_position node on the road/track, but I prefer just one node for the sake of the "one feature, one OSM element, and the possible adoption of simplified PTv2 (aren't you keeping up with that?).
Nevertheless, we can still use stop_area relations to group elements of a certain stop/station, especially complex ones

I think you get the rationalized bus route network mapped completely, though it's possible its implementation will get affected by localized ECQ in certain LGUs.

What about provincial buses now? Phil. Arena diversion terminal? VGC/PITX full utilization confirmed? And so on.
crisitunity (2020-05-19 17:05:28+00:00): Your ways are not tagged, so they can't get rendered. What are you trying to do?
DP24PH (2020-05-17 02:02:45+00:00): Change log:
Separation of arrivals and departures within Estrella bus stop as per installed MMDA signages

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Kindly comment down here.

Much love,

DEARPAUL24
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-05-17 19:03:52+00:00): Checked this on Mapillary, but there's no separate unloading zone.
DP24PH (2020-05-18 05:22:34+00:00): Upon previous checking for Estrella SB, there's a separated arrivals (unloading) and protected departures (loading) due to break into mesh fence/railing with the signages installed as of 2019-2020 per previous on-site commuting survey via Line 3. Will do the survey once again for the latest Mapillary images after the Community Quarantine.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-28 16:48:27+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2476097 ?
Raenbow (2020-05-27 22:01:46+00:00): Hi DenKeo,

I noticed you updated a few classifications from service to path around Ipoh including, for example, way 787815097 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/787815097). The OpenStreetMap Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway) suggests that highway=path is meant for pedestrian use but since cars are visible on this road in OpenStreetCam (https://openstreetcam.org/details/2248742/173/track-info from May 19, 2020) highway=service may be a better option, especially since it appears to be functioning as an alleyway between buildings. Is there a specific reason you used highway=path over highway=service?

I’m also curious about the highway link segments added around way 804792898 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804792898). I see you have added some extra highway links and turn restrictions to prevent u-turns and the residential road from crossing the primary. However, adding all of these extra segments in the data and turn restrictions can be tough to maintain since turn restrictions are easily broken when data moves around. Is there a reason you prefer this junction design? No u-turn restrictions are almost always modeled without these extra segments. An example of this is visible along the same road here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=23/4.593153447802184/101.08469714077214

Thank you
ancestry_brett (2020-12-14 23:36:06+00:00): The street name "North Drydock Row" was officially changed to "Voyager Ln"
Kovoschiz (2020-05-17 12:55:41+00:00): For continuity, please use `=motorway_link` annd add `motorway=no` for such case
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85322272
eggie (2020-05-17 05:47:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-17 05:51:28+00:00): Dag Mistirix.. Wanneer je overal de highway=service weghaalt zul je geen wegen meer zien en routeert het allemaal niet meer.
Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85322424
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-17 06:10:20+00:00): Ga je hier zelf aan de slag?
mistirix (2020-05-17 08:46:33+00:00): ik heb de highway service weer terug erop gezet. mijn excuus
eggie (2020-05-17 08:50:26+00:00): Top!  Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen. 
Veel plezier met mappen!
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-17 05:52:58+00:00): De fietsenstalling staat waarschijnlijk dubbel getagd. Mischien ook nog op een node. Die kan dan weg.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-05-17 06:09:06+00:00): Best lastig dit om goed te krijgen.. 
Dubbele tagging verwijderd. Vlak los van het bos gemaakt met multipolygoon relatie.
Je ziet anders de bomen in de parkeerplaats.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-05-17 05:55:05+00:00): Oke, maar haal je name=markt 12 er weer even af?
....dat hoort niet.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-05-17 06:02:44+00:00): naam verwijderd
eggie (2020-05-17 05:59:08+00:00): De Lidl is hier al getagd 
Je hebt nu van de amenity=parking nog een keer een supermarkt gemaakt.
Winkels taggen we bij op de adresnode. dat zal hier al het geval zijn.
eggie (2020-05-17 06:05:33+00:00): dubbele vermelding verwijderd  parking hersteld
mistirix (2020-05-17 08:49:34+00:00): ik hed het inderdaad bij het verkeerde getagd maar lidl was nog niet getagd, ik zal beter opletten de volgende keer, thnx!
eggie (2020-05-17 08:52:06+00:00): Nou.. Lidl toch wel.. het staat op de adresnode.
Best lastig te zien met editor iD.
MVG,
Eggie
mariotomo (2020-08-27 14:04:21+00:00): hola Brayan.  estás absolutamente seguro que estas restricciones (11108204, 11108203, 11108201, 11108200) existen realmente, como señales de tránsito?
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 14:09:54+00:00): Hello,
Could you please reply to the question above and also the others that you have not replied to at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8884459 ?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 14:10:23+00:00): Hola,
¿Podría responder a la pregunta anterior y también a las otras a las que no ha respondido en http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8884459?
Atentamente,
Andy Townsend, en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo de Datos de OSM.
ovruni (2020-05-17 06:19:03+00:00): Hola
He notado que en esta edición vuelven a tener las manzanas la etiqueta building=house[0], esta etiqueta está diseñada para estructuras individuales, así como las que se encuentran al lado derecho de la intersección Avenida Malecon Checa con Avenida Bellas Artes, las etiquetas para manzanas son place=city_block[1]. Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building%3Dhouse
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Dcity_block
Frans S (2020-05-22 10:38:44+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A request. Please try to map in according to the guidelines and stick to the object to be mapped.
See this document
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85323001
Frans S (2020-05-22 12:03:44+00:00): Hi. a few other issues .
Round buildings can be mapped by drawing a triangle ( what you did) followed by the figure O ( what you didn't always) 
You tend to oversize the round buildings sometimes with the factor 2 or more 
Please be more accurate about that
You overlooked also a few round buildings 
The tag residential for highways is mend to be used in (dense) urban areas. not here.  A hardly to see track ,very narrow,  is mostly not more than a path)
You also let nodes of highways  snap to other features, like buildings, Please avoid that.
Best regards
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2020-05-25 09:09:21+00:00): highway=primary mit construction=highway führt dazu, dass die Straße auf den meisten Karten als existent angezeigt wird, Hab's wieder zum aktuellen Zustand geändert.
***juggernaut*** (2020-05-26 06:49:37+00:00): Habe jetzt erst meinen Edit-Fehler bemerkt. Sollte eigentlich highway=construction und construction=primary werden
DP24PH (2020-05-17 06:04:10+00:00): Change log:
Bus stop arrivals/departures separation calibration in Mall of Asia Globe Rotunda as per installed MMDA/MOA signages

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Kindly comment down here.

Much love,

DEARPAUL24
opendcc (2020-05-17 08:12:18+00:00): Hallo,

steht da irgendwas - Gedenkstein oder ähnliches?
ritzlbruada (2020-05-17 09:48:02+00:00): Ja, eine Bronzestele mit den Flugdaten und ein Holzkreuz.  Wikipedia: Absturz der Fw 200 „Hessen“ 1945
oder
Artikel auf OVB online: https://www.ovb-online.de/muehldorf/neumarkt-st-veit/absturz-piesenkofen-letzte-flug-lufthansa-berlin-legenden-naehrte-13668092.html
opendcc (2020-05-17 12:30:54+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe statt des Tags am Wegpunkt (was vom Tagging her eh nicht korrekt war) die Stele eingezeichnet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7528791135
user_5359 (2020-05-18 18:32:59+00:00): Hello! Is there not no connection to existing highways?
MK 1 (2020-05-24 17:30:08+00:00): Repaired
joergro (2020-05-17 09:20:43+00:00): Deleted accidentally. Please restore. Thanks.
ToniE (2020-05-17 11:58:29+00:00): Thanks for the comment... done.
TheNet1996 (2020-05-17 09:35:01+00:00): Hallo,
Willkommen bei OSM und Danke für die Eintragungen!

Eine Bitte: 
Das Feld description ist nicht für Werbezwecke oder Werbebotschaften gedacht, siehe Wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description?uselang=de

Danke & Grüße
Mike
BraunMediaSolutions (2020-05-17 17:18:48+00:00): Sorry! Hab ich bereits geändert und allgemein kurz Info angegeben. Danke für den Hinweis.
eggie (2020-05-17 08:16:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. wellicht de website http://www.rust-een-weinig.nl/  nog aanpassen?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-17 10:00:36+00:00): naam phone website aangepast
Tomas_J (2024-07-08 21:02:42+00:00): Ahoj, ak chceš, pozri diskusiu nižšie - bavíme sa o názve jazera Aljaška, ktore si pomenoval.  Aký bol zdroj ? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153464681#map=19/48.91022/22.12780
eggie (2020-05-17 08:18:47+00:00): Dag mhvc

Hier hoort nog een tag bij
tourism=guest_house
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house

Dan zal de naam ook renderen
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-05-17 09:52:49+00:00): aangepast... als boven incl name website/ phone
Supaplex (2020-05-17 15:53:07+00:00): I recommend that name:zh should list both name:zh-Hant and name:zh-Hans, and even some Cantonese name, due to most Map application does not distinguish different zh language use  between Taiwan, China, Hong Kong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85326295
kevinchen1 (2021-09-30 16:38:06+00:00): Hi,

I want to provide feedback on this change.

The gate is always closed, so it needs the following tags to avoid routing through this road:

barrier=gate
access=no

I have corrected the access in this change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111925948

Thank you,
Kevin
rkkarnee (2021-10-01 08:30:54+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset : 85326410 and updating the necessary access tags to the gate.
I really appreciate the feedback provided, Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
rkkarnee
link0127 (2020-05-17 10:23:48+00:00): Das Gebiet westlich der zwei kleinen Fußgängerbrücken ist kein Gewässer mehr sondern ein Bruchwald, evtl. noch ein Hochmoor. Dies is auch deutlich in der Geländeschummerung im KAGIS zu erkennen. Außerdem war ich gestern dort und habe mir persönlich ein bild davon gemacht.
gurglypipe (2020-05-17 10:11:30+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits! Please consider using the ‘Q’ key in the ID editor to square up the corners of buildings. Just select the building and press ‘Q’. It makes the map neater and (generally, apart from old buildings) more correct. Ta :)
Chemmangat Hari (2021-11-04 02:42:53+00:00): Hey Richi,
When I was looking to map the building I found that you marked an area as grass, which is partially correct. Some errors I found was that, the grass area overlapped the road markings and when I was in my Esri Image (Clarity) beta I found there was a building(I assume) to the half right of your marking. Please do the necessary changes and happy mapping :)

Regards,
Chemmangat Hari
xmd5a (2020-05-27 20:21:13+00:00): Добрый день. Вы зачем грунтовку Перхурово - Черусти понизили до path? Я там ехал 2 недели назад, и это очень хорошая грунтовка. Меняю на track.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804846907
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rf7lv05n08ea4gd/Screenshot%20from%202020-05-27%2023-18-06.png?dl=0
Dodko (2021-07-28 11:16:21+00:00): Je tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7528375306 ešte prístrešok?
Fotku okolia na freemap.sk nevidno.
Pozri https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2774705
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-11 17:28:27+00:00): Esse trecho todo realmente é mão unica: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752090543
Pt873 (2020-06-11 22:44:32+00:00): É não, mão dupla.
user_2066394 (2020-05-17 09:39:14+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85327333
singinsmith (2020-05-17 18:19:08+00:00): okay vielen dank. werde das nächste mal darauf achten
eggie (2020-05-17 09:44:09+00:00): Fred,

Vaak is het zo dat tweewielers zijn uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer. Is dat hier ook zo?  Dan bijtaggen 
oneway:bicycle=no en evt
oneway:moped=no
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-05-17 09:45:58+00:00): Voeg je het zelf toe?  Want het is hier het geval.
mistirix (2020-05-17 11:21:32+00:00): heb het bij getagd.
eggie (2020-05-17 11:25:42+00:00): Top! Zo routeert t weer. Gr eggie
user_2066394 (2020-05-17 09:32:31+00:00): statt löschen besser disused: verwenden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85327360
Lt_Grillwurst (2020-05-17 09:49:08+00:00): Korrigiert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85328740
Jose Luis Infante (2020-05-26 15:03:57+00:00): Hola,
una pregunta sobre el pas de vianants: té indicacions només per vianants o també pels vehicles? Té butó per demanar el pas pels vianants?
Salutacions!
Salvador Carbó (2020-05-26 15:06:01+00:00): Hola Jose Luis,
té indicacions per als dos, i si que té un botó per demanar el pas pels vianants
merci!
Jose Luis Infante (2020-05-26 15:32:57+00:00): Perfecte! Ja ho he editat. Gràcies!
Misa_zumba (2020-10-05 11:37:35+00:00): I saw that this way doesn't have any tags. Can you add them please.
BCNorwich (2020-05-17 13:18:10+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I wonder, do you now for sure that the building has been demolished? Or are you assuming this because you can't see it on Esri imagery? The building was there and the shadow of the pitched roof can be seen.

Regards Bernard.
DexTheArcticFox (2020-05-17 13:19:40+00:00): I live there 😂
There used to be a greenhouse but that collapsed.
BCNorwich (2020-05-17 13:22:22+00:00): OK many thanks for the info.
gebux (2020-05-18 17:32:37+00:00): Hallo Karl 82, 
highway=path passt hier schon. 
highway=footway ist für explizit als Fußgängerweg (blaues Schild) gekennzeichnete Wege vorgesehen. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=footway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=path
ortho_is_hot (2020-05-17 09:57:04+00:00): "disused=highway=trunk" should read "disused:highway=trunk"
Negreheb (2020-05-17 21:27:32+00:00): Servus, also, da ist eine Note wo jemand schreibt, dass hier ein Pfad ist, der aber mit Schildern gesperrt ist. Du schreibst hier jetzt, dass da nichts mehr ist. Wie jetzt?
Connecticut (2020-05-18 01:33:12+00:00): ich hatte beim Weg access=no hinzugefügt.
bkascdakhcbdsdbvci hat den Weg später komplett gelöscht. 
Ich bin nicht vor Ort. Und hab ihn mir removed:  neu eingezeichnet.
sollen wir die Note wieder öffnen?
Negreheb (2020-05-18 07:42:08+00:00): Ich mach auf und werde dort mal vorbeifahren und Fotos machen.
emvee (2020-05-24 13:54:41+00:00): Beste Jan,

Met deze changeset is "bicycle=no" en "foot=no" toegevoegd aan https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804863553 en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52490339

Dat klinkt niet logisch omdat er fietsstroken zijn.

Foutje?

Groeten,

Martin.
Jan Wilts (2020-05-24 14:47:42+00:00): Beste Martin,

Dat moet een foutje geweest zijn, inmiddels gecorrigeerd. Excuses en bedankt!

Jan
ToniE (2020-05-17 11:48:35+00:00): fine, but ... you've spoiled some relations (turn-restrictions, bus route). I fixed that.
Please take care, although: iD isn't really good on relations. Since you're editing a lot, I'd recommend using JOSM.
EUradfahrer (2020-05-19 05:59:45+00:00): Hi ToniE, thanks for catching and correcting those. Re JOSM: I already looked at it in the past, but it seemed more difficult to use. But I should give it a second chance I guess.
eggie (2020-05-17 13:29:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
GerdP (2020-05-30 06:54:31+00:00): Hi! You created some empty route relations during the last days. Do you plan to fill them later?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109193
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109192
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109183
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109182
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109184
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109187
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109189
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109188
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109191
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11109190
rodrilafu (2020-05-30 08:04:48+00:00): 
Hello, I am waiting to learn how to develop bus routes, I am still testing but I can't hit the key. The modifications made are that they were wrong.
rodrilafu (2020-05-30 08:06:06+00:00): 
I don't know if route 6 got it right or not. I was selecting the stops and stopping points.
GerdP (2020-05-30 08:07:32+00:00): Bus relations are very difficult to map. What editor do you use?
rodrilafu (2020-05-30 08:24:45+00:00): Id Editor of Navegator
GerdP (2020-05-30 08:31:47+00:00): Sorry, can't help with that. Is it a fork of the standard id editor? I wonder why it doesn't produce any changeset comments. This is  uncommon and should be changed.
rodrilafu (2020-05-30 08:36:25+00:00): It is the browser editor
GerdP (2020-05-30 08:39:56+00:00): OK, I see your recent uploads contain the normal comments. 
I can't help with id because I never use it. I only work with JOSM. I'll contact an expert for bus routes, maybe he can help.
rodrilafu (2020-05-30 08:49:28+00:00): 
I am in contact with people in Spain who know how to do it. Thank you
GerdP (2020-05-30 08:51:19+00:00): OK, great! Maybe they can also help you to remove the obsolete relations.
rodrilafu (2020-05-30 08:54:29+00:00): thanks
skyper (2020-05-30 12:09:46+00:00): Hello rodrilafu

GerP did contact me.
Bus routes can get quite complex. As starting point, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buses, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Relation:route and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Relation:route_master.

What do you want to change on bus route 6?
So far it is present in the data base as "Public Transport version 2 (PTv2) with route_master (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4010004) and one route per direction (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3994553 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3996761).
What is wrong?

Greetings skyper
rodrilafu (2020-05-30 13:57:10+00:00): Hello,

I used 6 as a test, the one that is really wrong is 5, since there are stops that do not coincide by position. I think it is quite difficult for a beginner to do bus routes.
skyper (2020-05-30 14:51:59+00:00): You are right about the complexity and I, personally, never tried to edit a relation with iD.

You can contact a local user who did added the other relations and ask for help.

And/Or I can have a look at route 5 the next days but it is not easy to check/update from the couch. By chance, do you know if there are external sources allowed to use, like GTFS?
rodrilafu (2020-05-30 18:10:33+00:00): 
I do not know,

the location of the stops is correct.

All stops are at this link:

http://www.auvasa.es/auv_linea.asp?lin=5
skyper (2020-06-01 14:00:30+00:00): I had a closer look at route 5 and six and made little changes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86049452

I noticed little problems:

* Most platforms and all stops do not have a name, which makes it hard to work with.
* Platforms and stops are usually pairs, so https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3044774952 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3044774953 seem to be too far away from each other.
* The starting stop for route 6 going north is missing.

I am not sure how we can use the link you mentioned.

For more help, you might get into touch with https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/sanchi. It looks like an active and experienced user, speaking Spanish.

By the way, I deleted all the relations without member as they are useless.

Cheers skyper
Negreheb (2020-09-15 08:46:24+00:00): Servus, ich seh hier gerade wieder das Problem von StreetComplete (so gern ich es selbst verwende :D), dass doppelte Hausnummern einfach nicht angezeigt werden. Da sind die anderen Nummern eigentlich schon drinnen. Ich werde deine Hausnummer löschen und die andere Adresse raufschieben. Du brauchst nichts machen, ist mehr so Info, sonst nix.
LängengradLuigi (2020-09-15 15:26:55+00:00): Sorry, Danke dir!