piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:19:11+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2018-12-25 21:29:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:27:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
BCNorwich (2017-04-22 13:19:39+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've remove the turning circle from the grass area. Would you like to position it again please.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:55:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:34:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:41:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Andrea Musuruane (2017-04-23 08:04:19+00:00): Ciao, amenity=community_centre per una piscina è errato. Leggi qui come mapparle correttamente https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2017-04-23 08:02:39+00:00): Ciao. Per distinguere le farmacie dalle parafarmacie, bisogna usare il tag dispensing=yes o dispensing=no. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpharmacy Ciao, Andrea
SHARCRASH (2017-05-28 10:45:35+00:00): Hello! Why did you make this former [landuse area](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70140267/history) also a building?? Making it a building inside another building... There is even a service way crossing it without any building passage. By deduction this can't be a building.
Kostik (2017-04-22 08:02:50+00:00): http://sendpic.org/view/1/i/lvz08BkMHe9nXUsMbieZlBYyUGC.jpg
Superadlen (2017-04-27 14:32:34+00:00): merci kho  https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmdz/
mavl (2018-12-25 19:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:49:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:29:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-04-22 12:00:10+00:00): Dit gaat gewoon routeren voor autos nu. Zet het stukje tussen de bollard op slot.
Mumbly (2017-04-22 12:41:12+00:00): zal ik doen.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:57:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:35:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
nammala (2017-04-24 10:44:24+00:00): Hi Peng-Chung,

May I know the reason behind changing the place type to `city` as the wiki says it was `town` https://www.google.co.in/search?q=Tongzhou+District&oq=Tongzhou+District&aqs=chrome..69i57.210j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

regards,
nammala
Peng-Chung (2017-04-24 13:59:07+00:00): Thanks for this Mammala!

Tongzhou was a county-level city before 2009, and was merged by Nantong City in 2009. However, it is still in a ten-year '2010-2019' transit period, during which Tongzhou is financially independent from the city of Nantong, unlike the other two districts (namely Chongchuan, Gangzha). Therefore, it would be better to identify it as a "city" rather than a "district" now, but I will modify this when this transit period is over.

Best wishes,

Peng-Chung
nammala (2017-04-24 14:35:14+00:00): Thanks for getting back Peng.

Best regards,
nammala
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Nakaner-repair (2017-04-22 18:33:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48038336, 48040101, 48036569, 48037078, 48037718 where the changeset comment is: Revert historic road from Rome to Germany (all changesets by user &quot;Via Romea Germanica&quot;)
mavl (2018-12-25 20:21:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:16:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Mike Baggaley (2017-04-30 13:33:36+00:00): Hi Richard, welcome to OSM. I notice you have set bicycle=official on way 1688656, and I don't believe that is a valid value. Can you clarify what you meant?

Thanks,
Mike
Richard Carden (2017-05-02 19:51:58+00:00): It is a signed bicycle route between the canal and NCN56.
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-02 20:01:53+00:00): Hmm, I was about to say that it should be bicycle=designated or bicycle=yes then. However, I see that there is in fact a page explaining its use at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dofficial - but official is not mentioned in the main access page at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access which is the page I had been using.
So, please accept my apologies - I will remove 'official' from my list of probably incorrect values.

Regards,
Mike
DaveF (2017-04-22 11:58:45+00:00): Hi Gazzzer Welcome to OSM.
You drawn a polygon, but it requires some tags What were trying to represent? Note there's already a park mapped.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:39:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Nakaner-repair (2017-04-22 18:33:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48038336, 48040101, 48036569, 48037078, 48037718 where the changeset comment is: Revert historic road from Rome to Germany (all changesets by user &quot;Via Romea Germanica&quot;)
mavl (2018-12-25 20:43:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-04-22 11:54:47+00:00): Na 2 jaar weer begonnen met mappen.. dan alsnog een welkomstmail.

 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-22 11:50:52+00:00): Overweeg om over te stappen op editor JOSM als je er serieus werk van wil maken.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:JOSM/Guide
en
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
DD1GJ (2017-04-22 10:10:59+00:00): Hello, please stop all your edits and read the wiki article: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
Via Romea Germanica (2017-04-22 10:54:11+00:00): sure...that was the JOSM plugin uploading things...sorry...i still can't figure out how to upload a gpx here
DD1GJ (2017-04-22 11:37:50+00:00): JOSM is the wrong tool to upload gpx-data, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GPX . In former times, OSM needs real GPS recorded gpx data to draw the ways and other things. But today we can also use aerial photos.

If you only want to visualize your gpx on a map, please use http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/it/ or other track drawing websites

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Track_drawing_websites
Nakaner (2017-04-22 15:30:55+00:00): I started a full revert of all edits of this user.
Via Romea Germanica (2017-04-23 07:59:46+00:00): thank you all and sorry for the mess...

i actually want to bring my gpx track on OSM and then put it on my website because  these way users have a better experience...

the gpx (from Stuttgard (GER) to Rome (ITA9)) was builded in years of tracking than i cleaned it with google earth...

so now i just have to figure out how to import the gpx (that uMap imports easly) in OSM..

Regards
Nakaner (2017-04-23 08:11:10+00:00): OpenStreetMap is not the tool you need. What you need is a tool which overlays a GPX track or GeoJSON file over a base map. Javascript libraries like Leaflet or OpenLayers serve this purpose but OSM doesn't do that. We are just a project to create a database of features which exist on the ground.

Btw, please keep in mind that data traced from Google service might be copyrighted (and you not allowed to use it in public/to use it without using Google Maps).
mavl (2017-04-23 09:47:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту OpenStreetMap [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Вы испортили на общей карте название улицы (указав "тут юлька"). Пожалуйста, не портите данные на общей карте. Ваши изменения отменены.
mueschel (2017-04-26 09:49:16+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging changes? E.g. 'ref:-2001-02-12' is not a valid key. There should be a double '--' when using dates according to the wiki.

Cheers, Jan
fgouget (2017-04-27 08:35:01+00:00): As far as I can tell the wiki says to use " key:-date = value", and that the use of '--' is outdated: "An older version of ISO 8601 used the double hyphen to replace omitted years in partial dates".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_namespace_suffix_as_.22keyname:DATESPEC.3D...22
mueschel (2017-04-27 17:16:24+00:00): Indeed, it does. Since 7 days at least. 
There is an extensive discussion on the talk page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Date_specification
mavl (2018-12-25 21:39:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:29:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:42:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:55:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:35:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:34:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
_ANick_ (2017-06-20 15:06:38+00:00): Уважаемый Порфирий, можно узнать, откуда вы взяли название поселка Калинино?
mavl (2018-12-25 20:25:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-04-22 11:22:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-05-17 10:09:55+00:00): Hi mtbbiker99, please use "ele"="123.4".
not "üNN" or german comma "," is incompatible to english style (OSM is international, internal language is english). you can use "ele:note" to put extra information. But in Germany it is always "üNN" so not needed. Greatings, Alex
mavl (2018-12-25 21:35:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
alphensebezorger (2017-04-26 17:30:45+00:00): Hallo WernerV,
Mijn oog viel toevallig op dit voetpad: www.openstreetmap.org/way/399912387.
Foot=yes is overbodig op een voetpad, maar belangrijker: het pad loopt dwars door het huis op Rode Beuk 55. Daar moet iets zijn misgegaan, ik neem aan dat het huis klopt, maar het pad eromheen moet lopen. Kun je daar nog eens naar kijken?
Succes met 'mappen', Alphensebezorger.

P.S. Weet je al dat we nieuwe luchtfoto's van 'Beeldmateriaal' mogen gebuiken (ook in ID editor), zie https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=631139#p631139.
user_3957715 (2017-05-03 07:13:54+00:00): Добрый день -  прокоментируйтепожалуйста всеизменения 5 дней назад по поселку Нижний Яловец Черновицко й области.   Вся нанесенная информация соотвествует действительности . Я не понимаю почему вы затронули и удалили оутер. Хутора  присоединены к поселку потому что они находятся далеко но в паспорте пишут не хутор а поселок , есть решение сельсовета о присвоении хуторам  как части поселка улиц. Также просьба перед тем как серьзно изменять отношенияв админ границах -  пообщаться с создателями этих отношений. Над моей работой уже повандалил  один картораф --  я оспариваю .  https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwlADA1U6HeZTEZMem1kUUd4NDg
eggie (2017-04-22 11:20:41+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden
eggie (2017-04-22 11:22:31+00:00): Ten zuiden van Krachtighuizen heb je nu bosgebied vastgeplakt aan de weg.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48027995
ik zal het zo losmaken.
eggie (2017-04-22 11:23:58+00:00): Verder voeg je landuse=residential toe in een gebied wat al getagd is als residential.
Ik overweeg de changeset terug te draaien.
Je kunt gerust contact opnemen als je nog vragen hebt.
eggie (2017-04-22 11:26:44+00:00): reverted due to ignorance
eggie (2017-04-22 11:32:26+00:00): PB gestuurd.
eggie (2017-04-22 11:37:11+00:00): Wanneer je er serieus werk van wil maken begin dan je eerst in telezen en volg het advies op om te beginnen met het aanbrengen van poi's. Bv een bankje of winkel. Niet de landuse gaan verbouwen svp.
letihu (2017-07-10 10:27:40+00:00): Bei den "Verbesserungen" sollten aber keine neuen Fehler entstehen ;-)
Bitte immer darauf achten, dass die Wege weiterhin miteinander verbunden sind.
Z.B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4809482803/history
mit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4809482802/history

Happy mapping
Sanniu (2017-07-08 09:17:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488649842 - have no tags?
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-08 14:10:45+00:00): This should have been part of a relation. Thanks. Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50132316
JochenB (2018-01-21 00:59:09+00:00): Hallo Dreiko, 

Danke für deine Detaillierung! An zwei Stellen passt das leiter aber nicht zum OSM-Schema: Die Radfahrspuren der Schumi hast du als eigene Wege gemappt und an mittleren Sperrflächen hast du die Straße in zwei Einbahnstraßen aufgeteilt. 

Bitte schau im Wiki hier nach: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:lanes
und hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Bitte beachte, dass ein Radfahrstreifen laut Wiki mit cycleway=lane  bzw. hier mit cycleway:right=lane am Weg der allgemeinen Fahrbahn getaggt wird (kein "lane-Mapping"). So war es auch bereits teilweise eingetragen, nach deinen Änderungen dann doppelt.

Ein getrenntes Taggen von der allgemeinen Fahrspur macht nur Sinn, wenn es eine Barriere zwischen Radweg und Fahrbahn gibt, z.B. Leitplanke, Grünstreifen o.ä.). Wie trennend diese Barriere sein muss, wird verschieden interpretiert (reicht schon eine hohe Bordsteinkante oder erst eine Leitplanke).

Genauso ist es bei nur aufgemalten Sperrflächen. Dann bleibt es eine Linie, die Sperrflächen können mittels lanes getaggt werden.

Hintergrund ist, dass es für Router oft wichtig ist, ob zwischen Fahrspuren gewechselt werden kann bzw. ob die Straße gequert werden kann.

Grundsätzlich gilt das selbe für Gehwege, wenn die Straße überquert werden kann sollten Gehwege an die fahrbahn geschrieben werden (sidewalk=right/left/both).

Ich habe das alles korrigiert, nur dass du dich nicht wunderst.

Viele Grüße,
Jochen
maraf24 (2017-04-23 08:13:15+00:00): To jest oznaczenie punktu widokowego czy przejścia granicznego?
DD1GJ (2017-04-22 12:02:10+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich habe Deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, Da Du versehentlich die ganze Gemeinde in ein Gebäude verwandelt hast. Frankenberg ist bereits vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5967333

Wie alles funktioniert steht unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Wulfmorn (2017-04-22 12:55:17+00:00): Hi. Footpaths dont work unless they connect in both ends. Ive added a bunch just now. You can check if they seem right to you.