piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aharvey (2020-08-28 12:52:45+00:00): Hi Stephen, for https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/597954684 and https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/697517823 given https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ERbSnkfk_IKtrH1acdXD6w shows that it is signposted as for both bicycles and pedestrians, then bicycle=designated is more correct as according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#List_of_possible_values bicycle=yes just means you have legal access whereas bicycle=designated is a stronger form saying both you have access and it's explicitly signposted as for that particular mode of transport.
ortho_is_hot (2020-08-28 14:22:57+00:00): Also same goes for foot permissions: permissive means it can be used by pedestrians however that right could be revoked by a private landholder (for instance). For a shared path the convention is also to be foot=designated as permission to use it is given by signage.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:36:41+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
wellasus (2020-09-03 07:29:39+00:00): This is correct comment for this changeset 90068315,
Added service road#MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
Frans S (2020-09-04 10:43:59+00:00): Hello Joce2830 Thanks for mapping here
A few remarks.  
When a building contiue over the edge of a task, please map the complete task

About your mappings. 
Your mappings are to complicated. Keep it simple. Most buildings have rectangular forms.  Just a few ones have more complex forms.
Please square each rectangular building  with the Q key in the editor
I invalidate this task (120) and hope you will correct and improve your mappings.
Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:20:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90068555
map per (2021-05-29 06:54:12+00:00): Hallo Sebastian Schmidt,

zu deinem Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841656183) ist ein Hinweis aufgetaucht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2631685). Weißt du dazu mehr?

Viele Grüße
map per
Warin61 (2020-08-29 08:22:54+00:00): No comment.
No source.

And creating errors! Not the way to make a hole in a way, a multipoygon relation must be used. For the error see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.28337&lat=-36.80089&zoom=15

For the way to fix it see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon.
I expect you to fix the error.
Warin61 (2020-09-01 07:13:36+00:00): Still not fixed.
Glyphe (2026-06-15 14:05:52+00:00): Hi, this path was mapped with a tool that produced hundreds of points. Is there a way to batch edit them?

I'm planning to place less points but ensure that they are aligned with the 3D model. Is that OK?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841672328/history
feuerstein (2026-06-15 19:27:38+00:00): You have to move each point seperately or you can mark a group of points with your mouse and move them together. If you don't want to do the work, I can do it for you next week or so.
Glyphe (2026-07-15 17:33:26+00:00): Thanks for the hint for selecting multiple points, I've done the adjustment :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-10 04:45:34+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3773122 ?
Carto'Cité (2020-09-09 15:09:27+00:00): Salut Thomas,
Je ne vois pas ce bloc (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7852831241) dans les photos Mapillary prise le même jour. Est-ce que tu penses qu'il a été retiré ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=zWcMDF9HsfoySsgljmXY9w
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Truchin (2020-09-09 15:59:20+00:00): Bonjour Charles,
Les travaux ne sont toujours pas terminés. Donc vous êtes passés trop tôt :). Il y a bien des blocs béton à présent à l'intérieur du trait. Sinon, ils auraient mis des balises jaunes ou un trait discontinu.
Thomas
Carto'Cité (2020-09-09 16:01:28+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ton retour :)
Ça ressortait comme une erreur sous Osmose alors je me demandais.
À très bientôt.
Charles
Hedaja (2020-09-25 07:29:24+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap
Your business you added looked mostly correct. I added the address in the correct tagging scheme though.
While editing, you made a mistake and accidentally deleted the highway tag for Chapel Hills Dr. I fixed that for you. Don't worry, mistakes happen in the beginning.
Make sure you check before uploading your edits.

Cheers
Christian
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90072137
Pitoresker Pi (2020-11-25 16:13:16+00:00): Hallo, dieser Zufahrtsweg sollte nicht als "access=private" markiert werden. Hier ist keine entsprechende Beschilderung vorhanden. Bitte bedenke, dass du durch solches Tagging auch bspw. Fußgänger- oder Radfahrer-Routing auf diesem Zuweg Richtung Radbahn/Halde unmöglich machst.
highflyer74 (2020-11-25 20:26:35+00:00): @sh_sc03: entschuldige, wenn ich diese Diskussion "kapere", aber bei Durchsicht Deiner Änderungen erscheint mir, dass bei Dir ein Missverständnis bezüglich access=* und dergleichen vorliegt. Wenn etwas in Deutschland "privat" ist, dann dreht es sich um Besitzverhältnisse oder es geht um die Frage, wer zum Beispiel für die Pflege eines Wegs zuständig ist (Privat vs. öffentliche Hand). Ein Weg, der mit "Privatweg" ausgeschildert ist, ist ersteres. Dies mappen wir in OSM nicht (!).

Was wir mappen sind hingegen, wer einen Weg benutzen darf. Für access=private wäre das ein entsprechendes Schild vor Ort, welches ein Betreten oder Befahren verbietet. Bitte sei so nett, Deine Mappingpraxis an die OSM-Regeln anzupassen, da wir sonst eine Verschlechterung der Daten erreichen, und das möchte ja niemand. Danke und einen schönen Abend Euch!
matteo564 (2020-09-04 08:13:28+00:00): Hi, why do you think there was a mistake? In CTR VDA is well indicated and visible that the peak is named as was before ("Tête Noire" = Testa Nera) and the ridge/arete between this peak and the Mont Belleface is named "Crête Noire" (the name you gave to the peak), these are frenchisms or local dialects, but this isn't the point.
Vasily_S (2020-09-04 08:30:51+00:00): Hi, I was there 2 weeks ago and this is how it was marked. I was using OSM for navigation and was confused, so I decided to correct here. On the official trekking map of pila:
https://pila.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/0001-convertito-1.pdf
it also shows as Cresta Nera.
I don't speak neither French nor Italian, so there is of course a possibility that I misunderstood something. You should probably revert it back if you understand this properly.
matteo564 (2020-09-04 09:44:27+00:00): I checked some online sources and I fount it is very confusing. 
You mean you were on the top of the mountain? There was a plaque/plate or something similar that marked a name? Did you have any photo of them or of some signpost indicating the peak? Would be very useful! Meanwhile I make a little research on the internet

I think probably who compose that chart wasn't aware (didn't know) the real/correct name of the mountain. In many more professional paper hiking map it is named as "Testa Nera" but there is a possibility that the other name is simply another way to call it, therefore acceptable; so now i don't modify the name, also because those aren't valid source for OSM. It is necessary a physical survey and local information

An option for the moment could be adding the tags 
alt_name=Testa Nera
name:fr=Tête Noire
Davide Lasagna (2020-12-30 23:55:20+00:00): I would revert back to "Testa Nera" as indicated in the Carta Tecnica Regione VDA (https://mappe.regione.vda.it/pub/geonavitg/geodownload.asp?carta=CTRR). The word "Cresta" is more suitable for a ridge, while "Testa" refers to peak.
matteo564 (2020-12-31 13:59:43+00:00): I also think it is the right thing, the question is that in mainy online resources (at the moment more consulted than others due to the situation) is indicated the wrong name and this could create confusion. But as soon as possible i think it is necessary inserting the correct name eventually after a survey and consulting various sources.
Vasily_S (2020-12-31 14:36:58+00:00): Ok, it seems like I was too fast to do the change, sorry for the confusion. Please go ahead and revert it back. I guess the confusion stems from the fact that this place is really more like an endpoint of the ridge and hardly a peak.
Bóřa (2021-01-07 07:55:15+00:00): Uživatel HaPe-CZ zrušil v zde v ulici na Radouči cyklostezku (highway změnil z cycleway na path, zrušil i tag bycicle designated). To stejné provedl na mnoha dalších cyklostezkách v MB.
HaPe-CZ (2021-01-07 08:30:00+00:00): Jistě, i jsem očekával, že se nějaký cyklista ozve. Chodníky jsou v obcích primárně určeny pro chodce. Tam kde je společná plocha pro chodce i cyklisty má přednost chodec. Chování cyklistů jak ve městě tak i mimo je vzhledem k ostatním dosti vulgární. Taky mi před autem již jeden přistál, a to proto, že frajer nedal přednost. P.S. Kvalita snímků je tak bídná, že z toho lze poznat jen, že to není silnice pro auta ale pro lidi.
Bóřa (2021-01-07 09:07:32+00:00): Nechme stranou světonázory chodci/cyklisti/řidiči. Tady jsem všichni dobrovolní mapaři a jde o to popsat reálnou situaci tak, jak je. 
Zde a na mnoha jiných místech, které jste změnil je značka cyklostezky, takže komunikace je určená pro cyklisty a chodce.
Podívejte na letecké snímky na mapy.cz , kde to je vidět jasně pomocí červeně zbarveného dláždění (https://mapy.cz/s/novakosaje) případně na panoramě je vidět svislá značka.
Souhlasím, že podladové letecké snímky na openstreetmap úplně kvalitní nejsou. Nebylo by tedy lepší, pokud si nejste jistý stavem, tak to nemapovat?
Aktuálně je to tak, že po Vašem zásahu to vypadá, že tuto (a další) komunikaci cyklisté nemají přístup .Tím, že OSM je zdroj pro další aplikace, tak ty nefungují správně.
PS: doufám, že vaše úpravy opravíte doplněním bicycle=designated a segregated=yes, tak aby to odpovídalo realitě. highway=footway tam klidně nechte.
HaPe-CZ (2021-01-07 09:38:11+00:00): Ano, máte pravdu, na tom odkazu to vidět je. Ale byl jsem již dříve adminem důrazně upozorněn, že OSM a Seznam nemají uzavřenou dohodu o využíváním Mapy.cz pro mapování na OSM, a že zde používat jakékoliv odkazy na jiné mapy překračuje právní rámec. (To že mapy.cz využívají opravy nebo upřesnění z OSM je věc druhá).
jmsbert (2021-01-24 15:16:09+00:00): Hallo Ana Luisa, vielen Dank für die Fehlerbehebung - gut, dass die Qualitätskontrolle so gut funktioniert. Trage gerade weitere Adressen ein, dieses Mal aber mit korrekter PLZ...
Geofreund1 (2023-10-10 14:31:55+00:00): Hallo Gino-52,
Bitte überprüfe die Adressen in der Straße Am Lindengraben bzw. Weiherfeldsiedlung in Gründau-Lieblos. Da stimmt einiges nicht mit Hessen ALKIS überein.
Danke
Gino-52 (2023-10-11 07:20:01+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,
kannst Du die Abweichung mal genauer beschreiben.
In der Straße Weiherfeldsiedlung kann ich keine Abweichung feststellen.
Am Lindengraben habe ich, soweit ich mich erinnere, nichts geändert. Die fehlenden Adressen hast Du ja schon eingetragen.
Viele Grüße
Geofreund1 (2023-10-11 08:59:10+00:00): Ja gerne:
die Hausnummern 1-8 in der Straße Weiherfeldsiedlung hast du auf "Am Lindengraben" geändert. Warum? Dadurch ergibt sich u.a. eine Doppelung der HN 4.
Gino-52 (2023-10-11 09:24:37+00:00): Uii, das war ein Fehler. Wahrscheinlich durch kopieren von Adressdaten.
Habe es gerade geändert
bxl-forever (2020-09-03 13:39:47+00:00): Hello,
I suggest you ignore "fixes" suggested by iD.
iD is a simple online editor, it can track some mistakes but there are many false positives.
An example here: you created a node to join ways 644843302 and 484533855 near Madou station.
The first one is the cycle track, the second one is an underground corridor inside the metro station.
Even though they "cross" when looked from the sky, they are on different levels.  Joining them cause more problems for navigation.
Look at the tags before and please never trust iD blindly.
Happy mapping!
VéloJesse (2020-09-03 13:47:58+00:00): Apologies! Will check better next time.
skyper (2020-09-03 11:18:59+00:00): Hi

How can you add access restrictions from imagery?

Where is the identification that this is a Amazon logistic Edit?

Where is the #hashtag of the task?

Where is the ground source as stated in the wiki?

Reviewer?

Cheers skyper
kmneh (2020-09-03 13:19:50+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. i have added the access restrictions based on the imagery  https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1B2syCN_UmCFVNh24eu5hg&focus=photo&lat=52.43091272195096&lng=13.461959017453214&z=17 .As mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935.our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. Can you let me know what is the ground source mentioned in the comment I didn’t get it. always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
kmneh
skyper (2020-09-03 14:38:02+00:00): Why was the source not mentioned?

So the #hashtag is one of several issues regarding:

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

All of you stop editing until all issues are solved and tell your fellows and read the wiki mean-time.

Just take a look at your wiki page:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_Logistics#Editing_Process

> "They make an edit only if there is ground data available and all edits are reviewed by a second level reviewer. They also have a team of GIS experts who audit a random sample of reviewed cases to ensure high standards of edits contributed to OSM."

But just ask your instructor. They should now.

It is not my part to tell you the guidelines.
skyper
kmneh (2020-09-04 13:25:35+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your response. Our lead had initiated the discussion in the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. Thanks for your valuable inputs.
Regards,
kmneh
skyper (2020-09-05 09:28:04+00:00): Was soll ich mit dieser Antwort anfangen? Sie bezieht sich weder auf meine konkreten Fragen noch ist sie korrekt. Hast Du sie Dir überhaupt durchgelesen?

Wir bei Euch immer die Wahrheit verdreht?

Warum kommt weder von Dir noch von Deinem Reviewer eine persönlich formulierte Antwort auf meine konkreten Fragen?

skyper
kmneh (2020-09-07 16:07:58+00:00): Hi Skyper, 
Sorry for the delay in response. As already mentioned i have edited based on mappillary overlay present in OSM. we are already working on updating hashtags in our edits, please give us some time to get back on it. We have an internal review team which performs a second level check on all the edits made by us and provides feedback in case of an incorrect edit which is then fixed back in OSM. We try to be inline with the OSM wiki editing guidelines to ensure the map data quality added by us. Thanks for the feedback. Always happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
kmneh
Frans S (2020-08-28 16:00:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I reviewed this task .
Please pay more attention on squaring the buildings you map. On an image a building don't seem to be rather rectangular . This is an artefact and can be mapped as rectangular

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor
I invalidate task 116 so you can adjust your mappings.

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
donuzium (2020-08-29 01:15:52+00:00): Hello. Thank you for your reviewing. I learned a lot.

>This is an artefact and can be mapped as rectangular

Eureka!
I wondered squaring building's objects which is not seems to be square on imagery (like a building which sheered in camera lends).

Thank you so much.
Best regards.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 10:37:26+00:00): لماذا قمتم بحذف العنصر التالي:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12rH
Frans S (2020-09-09 11:57:24+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them.
Big estate houses are often very irrigular shaped. you cannot map them just with 1 rectangular. 

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-09-09 12:00:46+00:00): Please take a look to this page where you can see both your mappings and the modifications which had to be made
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90644444
Best regards
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-28 11:39:00+00:00): Hallo wh_LT, willkommen bei OSM.

Diese Art von Mapping habe ich bis jetzt noch nicht gesehen. Seit wann werden Kreuzungen als Fläche (Way) und einem Namen erfasst? Danke.

Vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841708451

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
wh_LT (2020-08-29 11:40:22+00:00): Hallo pitscheplatsch,
die lokale Bevölkerung benutzt bestimmte Namen für markante Kreuzungen, die sich im Sprachgebrauch eingebürgert haben. Wir möchten diese Namen in OSM als POI hinterlegen.
Laut Wiki ist ein Tagging über eine Fläche möglich, um den Namen auf eine Kreuzungsfläche zu beziehen und nicht auf einzelne Knoten oder Signale.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dyes

Andere Möglichkeiten in OSM gefunden:
- als locality (z.B. "Graßmayrkreuzung")
- name auf traffic_signal ("Gagu Complex Crossroad","Dolomitenkreuzung")
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-04 05:22:44+00:00): Hallo wh_LT, vielen Dank für die Antwort.

Hätten idealerweise nicht die anliegenden Straßen (Ways) die Kreuzungsfläche mit gemeinsamen Nodes schneiden müssen? So steht es zumindest im verlinken Wiki beschrieben.
wh_LT (2020-09-04 05:57:26+00:00): Hallo pitscheplatsch,
danke für den Hinweis. Ja, die Schnittpunkte sollten einen Knoten haben. Ich habe es schlicht vergessen und jetzt nachgeholt.
Fra00 (2020-08-30 11:07:35+00:00): Ciao,
Questa modifica è un po' fuori luogo e ti spiego il perché. Penso che tu ti sia rifatto alle linee guida in italiano, che però sono datate; in linea generale quelle inglesi sono più affidabili e da seguire. Queste danno poca importanza al numero degli abitanti e molta ai servizi offerti: diversi dei centri che hai taggato come village hanno infatti ospedale, scuole superiori, tribunali, ecc... Inoltre c'è stata poco fa una discussione sull'argomento, che sebbene non sia giunta a una vera e propria conclusione, ha reso tutti concordi sulle cose che ti ho detto qui sopra.
Thibault Rommel (2021-03-12 09:49:43+00:00): Zijn dit woonerven (borden F12a/b), of gewone residentiele straten? 
Een woonerf kan onmogelijk een maxspeed van 30 km/h hebben.
canihavesomecoffee (2021-03-12 11:56:25+00:00): @Thibault: Dank voor de terechte opmerking. Ik was in de foutieve veronderstelling dat een lagere snelheid ook betekende dat het als woonerf gemarkeerd mocht worden. Aangezien er enkel een zone 30 is in deze straten, heb ik de wijziging naar woonerf ongedaan gemaakt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100906542
Thibault Rommel (2021-03-12 12:25:40+00:00): Bedankt! :)
totera (2020-08-30 10:43:56+00:00): Ciao GFS, la popolazione non è l'unico criterio di cui tenere conto per la classificazione dei centri abitati.
Camerino ha meno di 10000 abitanti, ma la presenza di università, ospedale, scuole, ecc. fa sì che sia più rispondente alle definizioni la classificazione come town ("Towns normally have a good range of shops and facilities which are used by people from nearby villages") anziché village ("smaller than a town with few facilities available with people traveling to nearby towns to access these").
VictorIE (2021-03-01 22:05:19+00:00): 
Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11554498
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757697140

These two are both tagged amenity=townhall. Would you know which is correct?
Frans S (2020-08-28 15:25:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Your mappings are not that accurate as they could be.  Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building and squaring.

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90076459
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-28 11:43:56+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90079370
pitscheplatsch (2020-08-28 11:44:29+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

#test #data
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Warin61 (2020-08-30 08:01:08+00:00): Hi,

Relation outer ways cannot share segments .. sorry but that is not on. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=146.79639&lat=-19.29211&zoom=18

Humm how about a simple way - map the extent of the property - fence lines to foot path and tag that as the motel? You already have the buildings etc.
Frans S (2020-08-28 15:21:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay more attention on accurate mapping. Your mappings don't reflect the buildings . 

This task 841 is still open for mapping. Please correct your mappings
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90076905