piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_1566574 (2021-07-27 08:58:22+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est un sujet qui divise, certains on d'ailleurs voulu rendre phone=* obsolète au profit de contact:phone=*, en vain.

Donc effectivement très discuté (un peu comme tout), et oui, le Wiki c'est le livre de chevet du contributeur. Indispensable, et à consulter en particulier pour ce genre d'édition.
D'ailleurs :
1. Toujours se renseigner
2. Consulter et échanger avec la communauté

Je ne pense pas que vos contributions soient annulées, mais prudence, ce sujet divise...
Merci pour votre réponse, en espérant avoir pu aider, bonne journée !
– Antonin
peregrination (2021-07-26 22:36:13+00:00): finally the benches 👍
tekim (2021-07-27 00:05:36+00:00): Given that there are a number of houses along this road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16349170
I would say that it should be left as highway=residential.
Viki_travel_weak (2021-08-09 14:44:01+00:00): we intentionally chose this type of class in right not to put too high a class for roads located in a forest area, on the osm wiki it is indicated that the residential area is it, it is not always clear that this is a settlement and therefore, in conformity with the osm wiki, we set service, though in some places yes really use the residential tag. Thank you for your comment!
tekim (2021-08-09 15:07:49+00:00): If the road provides access to multiple houses, it should be highway=residential.  That is the correct class - the road is very important to the families that live along it.  

BTW, most of what you are mapping in this area isn't really National Forest per se, it is private land.  Mapbox - like anyone else - is free to map anywhere they would like, but if your objective is to map "protected areas", this doesn't really qualify.
Enock4seth (2021-08-05 08:44:54+00:00): Please avoid creating island roads, kindly connect them to the nearest one. See https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/967623700

And avoid using only #######hashtags for changeset comments, thank you
gpserror (2021-07-26 17:48:02+00:00): Hi thanks for your additions, Just some comments - some of the stuff you have tagged landuse=recreation ground, I'd think that was for things like parks or sports complexes(which have another tag) .  Perhaps just tagging them as natural=grass would be good.   You may also want to run the 'square' tool on buildings so they have perpendicular corners.  Also, note that gabled roofs might make it look like buildings have dents in them, but in actuality the sides are straight and that's what's touching the ground (though things like eaves make it really hard to tell sometimes).  Good luck!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108638494
ovruni (2021-07-26 20:41:26+00:00): Hola, he recuperado esta vía, la cual es una vía de servicio para el estacionamiento, ya que los carros no acceden al estacionamiento volando.
Saludos
ElliottPlack (2021-07-26 17:53:49+00:00): Holy Cow!!
ZeLonewolf (2021-07-29 03:11:48+00:00): Okay, now you're just showing off :)
gscholz (2021-08-14 07:49:13+00:00): Hi patodiez,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Ñemby", "San Lorenzo" and "Rincón" by deleting way 279386384:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.48947&lat=-25.37939&zoom=12

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108639576

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
ovruni (2021-07-26 20:43:07+00:00): Hola, tanto en la vía del poder judicial como en la del mercado se ha agregado la etiqueta de edificio, la cual esta destinada para edificios individuales, por lo cual las he retirado.
Saludos
eggie (2021-07-26 18:48:17+00:00): Mooi... Brug opengesteld..
weer actueel. 
maaarrrr..  is de naam van de brug werkelijk 'fiets- en voetgangersbrug new'
Verder heb je de specificatie nog steeds op construction staan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108640855

Ook mis ik hier de highway=cycleway tag..? em zie een foutmelding overlappende verkeerswegen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-26 19:08:41+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk.. ... 

Op de laatste satfoto is niets van de brug gezien. weet je het wel zeker.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=26-07-2020&loc=51.70099%2C5.458472%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-06-18&acqid=20210618_110155_SV1-04%2C20210618_110157_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1
Ik heb de wegen die op elkaar geplakt zijn verwijderd en het fietspad laten staan. surface=gravel heb ik verwijderd. Wat is de surface= hier.. Op fietspaden ligt soms wel fine_gravel.
Het opgeplakte fietspad op de brug heb ik verwijderd en van de brug zelf een fietspad gemaakt.
Hoe kom je van de westkant van de Brugstraat op dat fietspad. Is daar nu een oversteek?

MVG
eggie
Geertjuh (2021-07-26 19:19:25+00:00): Oke dank je. fiets/wandelpad  oppervlakte is fine gravel. En ja de brug ligt er zeer zeker. Op de luchtfoto zie je de aanleg van het grondwerk tbv landhoofd. THV De brugstraat kun je de hoofdweg recht oversteken naar het fietspad aan de westzijde.
http://www.thuisinhetnieuws.nl/artikel/71840/fotos-fietsbrug-bij-vinkelse-molen-gelegd.html
eggie (2021-07-26 19:28:49+00:00): Yep.. ik zie het nu...
Je zou zelf even surface=fine_gravel toe kunnen voegen..
.. en wellicht even bij de brug kunnen kijken hoe die oversteek nu is. Dat zal geen track zijn.
Mapse
Eggie
eggie (2021-07-26 18:50:35+00:00): Hier heb je een fietspad ingetekend... Over een ander pad heen.
Je hebt het fietspad op slot gezet met access=no  Kennelijk mag daar niemand komen?
access=no is bijna altijd fout. 
Het betekent Verboden Toegang.
Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108641089
MVG
eggie
marc__marc (2023-04-25 23:58:57+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967639489
roof:slope:direction -> roof:direction
and what's the meaning of roof:angle ?
a flat roof always has a tiny slope for water assessment
Regards,
Marc
BubbaJuice (2023-04-26 05:08:48+00:00): I think the angle was meant for the tilt of the roof. I think I just used the wrong tag for the direction. This was quite a bit ago so I don't really remember. Do what you want to the tagging.

-BubbaJuice
eggie (2021-07-26 18:52:49+00:00): Dag Geert. We taggen uitsluitend op de adresnodes
Zoek de adresnode op en tag daar bij amenity=doctors
name=....
phone=+31
website=

De gebouwomtrek weer leegmaken. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108641237
MVG
eggie
Lejun (2021-07-28 16:36:25+00:00): Attention à l’utilisation de l’attribut highway=cycleway, celui-ci est destiné à une piste cyclable en site propre et n’est pas destiné à un usage mixte avec des piétons (sauf cas très particuliers). Pour une voie verte et assimilés la combinaison à utiliser est :
highway=path (Voie non carrossable)
foot=designated (Voie pensée pour être utilisée par des piétons)
bicycle=designated (Voie pensée pour être utilisée par des cyclistes)
eggie (2021-07-26 18:55:01+00:00): Beste Geert.. Kijk nu eens naar je tags
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108641373

Een kinderopvang met amenity=doctors?

Moet dat geen amenty=childcare zijn
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare

MVG
eggie
Claudius Henrichs (2021-07-26 18:36:11+00:00): Changeset description should have read:
Details around Salam Terminal of IKA airport
SomeoneElse (2021-07-27 00:27:58+00:00): Hello jesus0607,
Can you explain why you deleted so many things here?  As it doesn't match the imagery, I'll revert it in case it was a mistake.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-07-27 00:28:30+00:00): Hola jesus0607,
¿Puedes explicar por qué borraste tantas cosas aquí? Como no coincide con las imágenes, lo revertiré en caso de que haya sido un error.
Atentamente,
Andy
olo81 (2021-08-03 14:01:48+00:00): Dlaczego zakaz ruchu ? jest na tej znak zakazu ruchu? access=no
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655042536
Czev92 (2021-08-04 11:35:02+00:00): Faktycznie, wkradł się nieumyślny błąd, już poprawiłem.
wegspotter (2021-10-27 18:57:37+00:00): Vonnis is in behandeling in beroep.
DUGA (2022-08-25 03:48:12+00:00): If there is no physical barrier, you should create a separate road.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967644260#map=19/41.96698/-75.73937
351293 (2021-10-14 14:42:26+00:00): Hallo, Du hast hier mehrere Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501499958/ und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501499952/ und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501499951/) als im Bau befindlich eingetragen.
Sind die Häuser doch nicht fertig gebaut oder war das ein Versehen?
LG
Hegau Bodensee (2021-10-14 19:10:23+00:00): Hi!

Die Häuser wurden neulich abgerissen und werden zur Zeit neu aufgebaut.

LG
eggie (2021-07-26 19:17:18+00:00): Top!.. Nog even de spelfout eruit
uisartspraktijk Vinkel
en
phone begint in osm met +31
Gr eggie
limes11 (2021-07-26 20:59:38+00:00): Gleiches hier, demolished:highway
limes11 (2021-07-27 20:49:40+00:00): habe das für dich erledigt
limes11 (2021-07-26 20:59:03+00:00): Hallo, 

falls 306120085 zerstört ist, dann kann der highway-Tag nicht bleiben; demolished:highway=path würde gehen.

VG
limes11 (2021-07-27 20:49:45+00:00): erledigt
eggie (2021-07-26 19:35:07+00:00): Top!
DressyPear4 (2021-07-26 21:18:43+00:00): Olá, adicione apenas o que existe, não crie edições fictícias.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108642879
jonasgiron (2021-07-28 15:05:49+00:00): Bom dia, desculpe-me, mas preciso de ajuda.
Preciso que seja possivel criar uma rota pela balsa de Manaus/AM até Belém/PA, pois os caminhões seguem esse trajeto, vi que tem a linhas traçadas, porem não conseguimos criar a rota por esse percurso. Até a cidade de Santarém/PA é possivel, após isso não conseguimos mais deixar o traçado pela rota da balsa. Consegue me ajudar ou me indicar quem poderia?
Cristoffs (2021-10-23 10:50:25+00:00): Proszę nie sklejaj tak landuse, strasznie jest trudno poprawić.
Mordechai23 (2021-10-23 15:12:12+00:00): on już miał blokadę 2 razy między innymi za to
Glassman (2021-07-28 17:43:59+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108642930
Glassman (2021-07-28 17:44:19+00:00): You edit looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108642930
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-07-28 02:45:48+00:00): المنازل الخاصة لا توضع إلا كمباني عل الخريطة لذا نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة الأماكن الشخصية للخريطة العامة
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108643371
skyper (2021-07-27 18:56:41+00:00): Hallo fratinello
Das Eintragen von Trottoirs als eigenständige Objekte ist sehr umstritten. Siehe u.a. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73299

Ein Kritikpunkt ist die mangelhafte Umsetzung, was auch leider bei Deinen Änderungen zutrifft.
1. Die Gehwege sowie Querwege müssen auch mit den STraßen verbunden werden. Z.B. auf der nördlichen Seite beim Übergang der Waldshuter in die Alte Basler Straße.
2. Gehwege sollten als diese gekennzeichnet werden: `footway=sidewalk` bzw `path=sidewalk`
3. An der Straße sollte `sidewalk=*` entsprechend angepasst werden zu `sidewalk[:left/right]=separate` und zusätzlich noch `foot=use_sidepath` ergänzt werden.

Nebenbei zerstört iD zur Zeit häufig die Reihenfolge von der Mitgliederliste der Relationen. In diesem Fall waren Buslinie 1 und 3 betroffen.

Habe u.a. die Relationen korrigiert, aber einiges ist noch zu verbessern.

Grüße skyper
fratinello (2021-07-27 19:45:19+00:00): 1 und 2 hab ich nicht gewusst
3 und 4 verstehe ich nicht
sorry
skyper (2021-07-28 09:31:10+00:00): Hey
Danke für die Antwort. In Freiburg habe ich schon Teile repariert bzw. so umgesetzt, z.B.
Basler Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/47.98542/7.82418), Eschholzstraße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108643474#map=17/47.99018/7.83172) oder Habsburger Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.00864/7.85528).

zu 1. habe ich noch Beispiele:
* Fahrrad-Routing-Insel (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942792992) (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=47.55459%2C7.94722%3B47.55414%2C7.94673) sollte wohl an Straße angebunden werden.
* Fehlende Verbindung/Kreuzung der Straße (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=47.55487%2C7.94779%3B47.55472%2C7.94814)

zu 3:
Irgendwie sollte an der Straße der separate Gehweg eingetragen werden. Hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26531564) steht `sidewalk=both`. Somit ist der Gehweg doppelt, daher `sidewalk=separate`. `foot=use_sidepath` bedeutet, dass ein Seiten/Nebenweg benutzt werden sollte. Als Beispiel kann die Scheffelstraße dienen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42919308). Ansonsten die Straßen von oben.

zu 4.:
Route Relationen haben eine bestimmte Ordnung damit sie eine geschlossene Linie bilden. Leider ist iD da sehr fehleranfällig. Aufteilen oder Vereinigen von Linien ist mit Vorsicht zu geniesen und bei Rundkursen oder Kreisen, wie Buslinie 1 und 3, ist iD zu vergessen und schmeißt die Reihenfolge komplett durcheinander.

Ciao skyper
fratinello (2021-08-05 12:02:08+00:00): Hoi skyper,
wenn Du Dich in Freiburg auskennst, dort sind einige Straßen je nach Uhrzeit mit einem Tempolimit begrenzt. Ich wohne nicht dort und bin mir nicht sicher, wo es losgeht bzw. aufhört. Bei der Schwarzwaldstraße (Bereich Ausgang Tunnel nach Westen) habe ich gesehen, dass die maximale Geschwindigkeit und die zeitliche Begrenzung gleich hoch sind. Das ist wohl falsch. Lt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed:
Beispiel 1: Die zulässige Höchstgeschwindigkeit ist 100 km/h von 6-19 h, ansonsten 120 km/h.
maxspeed=120
maxspeed:conditional=100 @ (06:00-19:00)
Schönen Gruß, Fratinello
skyper (2021-08-05 22:15:08+00:00): Salli Fratinello
Auf der B 31 (Schwarzwaldstraße) gilt westlich des Tunnels bis zur Kronenbrücke mittlerweile 24/7  30 km/h. Ist wohl vergessen worden, das `:conditional` zu entfernen. Schau ich mir mal an.
Grüße skyper
skyper (2021-08-07 11:52:58+00:00): Habe nichts verdächtiges gefunden, entlang der B 31.
user_2066394 (2021-07-26 21:30:50+00:00): shelter=*
bench=*
tactile_paving=*
eggie (2021-07-26 20:09:57+00:00): feedback
Best lastig die accesstags.
bicycle en foot = designated hoort niet op een fietspad.

We hebben drie typen fietspaden. Hier zie je welke tags daar bijhoren
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

Welk bord staat vooraan bij de Brugstraat?
gr eggie
Keima (2021-07-26 20:01:06+00:00): et de parkings vélo
literan (2021-07-27 14:32:02+00:00): тропа просто упирается в забор?
Konstantin Filippov (2021-07-28 18:23:04+00:00): Спасибо, поправил
eggie (2021-07-26 20:21:33+00:00): Dag Mr Rikkie.. Wanneer dit de nieuwe nummering is van de velden lijkt me dat correct.

MVG
eggie
user_8101879 (2021-07-27 14:47:32+00:00): This role is a big bug ; please read this and delete what you have done
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
seav (2021-07-27 15:15:55+00:00): Sorry, but I disagree with you. The role values "admin_centre", "outer", and "inner" are only mandated for boundary=administrative relations which is the main focus of the wiki page you linked.

"admin_centre" especially doesn't make sense for religious boundaries.
user_8101879 (2021-07-30 20:39:09+00:00): Hello,

Here some other informations about all relations boundary :
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/relations/boundary#roles

The 4200 roles boundary are yours. The 8 600 000 roles outer are other people : do you think that everybody is wrong but you ?

Maybe they have read that ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Types_of_relation
For the relations boundary : "Defined in similar manner as multipolygons". And I think that you know that for multipolygons the border of the zone is with the role "outer".

And here an example of boundary/religious_administration :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3768550

With an admin_centre, 2 place_of_worship, one building (the presbytery), one cemetery and some "outer" like needed. I like their work, very complete.

So please delete your roles "boundary" and put back the roles "outer"

Best regards
Vinber-Pro (2021-07-27 05:22:35+00:00): Bonjour,
le gite est déja présent dans OSM, que vous avez ajouté (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330186530#map=19/43.97821/-0.39168), c'est un doublon que vous venez de faire non ?
Le dernier que vous avez ajouté n'a pas d'attributs principal et les données que vous avez ajoutées semblent absentes du gite que vous avez ajouté il y a 6 mois ?

Pour le téléphone, de préférence +33 7 ....
et il n'est pas recommandé de renseigner les codes postaux et villes.

Il faut définir la catégorie dans OSMAnd, là vous n'avez défini que le nom.

Enfin attention car parfois avec osmand, il peut y avoir des données présentes non affichées aussi :)

Bonne carto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108644322
Martin868 (2021-08-30 19:44:29+00:00): This changeset totally broke the wood relation in this area. All lakes and cutouts (inners) were disconnected because the relation was deleted. An accident  I hope because this is very poor editing. I recreated the woood area and rebuilt a relation with all the inner I could find.
LogicalViolinist (2021-08-30 20:28:43+00:00): I don't see how adding addresses broke it, but i'll check it later tonight
Viajero Perdido (2021-08-30 21:24:03+00:00): This changeset: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108779287
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1513365
Martin868 (2021-08-30 21:28:26+00:00): There we a few so I might have picked the wrong one. I did a lot of fixing already so if you like to can have a look and see if I missed something.
LogicalViolinist (2021-08-30 22:22:44+00:00): it might have been an accident(josm) not downloading the relation or something, I usually try to not screw up canvec forests, I try to fix the many overlapping forest's lakes and wetlands polygons
Martin868 (2021-08-30 22:47:15+00:00): I do the same. No sweat. A+
muralito (2021-07-28 00:41:59+00:00): Hola. Que criterio usaste para pasar esto a "river"?
No parece que tenga el ancho suficiente.
Lee Carré (2021-07-27 11:43:34+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 🙂.

Also, smaller changeset areas, please.
Super-Map (2021-07-27 17:02:45+00:00): I know what I'm doing "perfectly"... thanks.
Lejun (2021-07-28 16:41:55+00:00): That’s a good thing that you do know what you’re doing unfortunately we cannot read your mind and a more explicit changeset comment is always welcomed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108644521
Lee Carré (2021-07-28 20:12:37+00:00): “I know what I'm doing "perfectly"”

The quote-marks make you seem less then sure about that. Not to mention the repetition of similar words in the original changeset comment. Seems more like the comment was a hasty afterthought.

But, OK, in that case you should have no problem responding cordially, in good faith, setting descriptive comments (like how, why, and where you improved the map; because surely all changesets are intended as improvement) and (at least in the case of this changeset) excluding the Bailiwick of Jersey from the bounding box, since you made no changes there.

Actions are more convincing than words, so show me your superior competence, rather than merely telling me.

When I saw your changeset in the list (while the map displayed my island, thus only lists changesets with bounding boxes which include my island), I thought you might be another of a few locals joining the effort, since your comment made zero mention of France. If it had, I would've known to ignore it, without any need to examine it further. Whereas, I was misled by the combination of large bounding box and vague comment.

If I'm to take you at your word, then you intended to waste my time. Charming.
Lee Carré (2021-07-28 20:35:05+00:00): “I know what I'm doing "perfectly"”

Yet, you keep doing that which makes it seem otherwise: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108725095
Super-Map (2021-07-28 21:32:17+00:00): ..."Actions are more convincing than words"... Perfectly right! Your so "funny"! Registered since 2021-05-02 and only 5,131 Map changes! I have nearby 7000000 of change in this map I I know PERFECTLY what I'm doing sir Jersey... And in contrary of too much contributors I know "perfectly" the goal of this map... I'm not your TEACHER... And this map isn't a GAME! I have deleted a VANDALISM  near your ISLAND!...
Lee Carré (2021-07-29 00:19:52+00:00): “Registered since 2021-05-02 and only 5,131 Map changes!”
Relevance? At least, without invoking yet more fallacies.

I see that you prefer quantity over quality. What was that about games versus seriousness?

I go out and survey, rather than worry about numbers from my armchair.

As a surveyor, I've had to fix changes made by experienced armchair mappers whose numbers were all large. So your boasting is silly to me. Numbers don't matter when the changes aren't good. If you're as experienced as you claim, then you'd know this.

“I have nearby 7000000 of change in this map”
So? Yet more fallacies. This is hardly better than counting changesets. A vandal can make many changes too.

In that case, you should know better than to be making rookie mistakes, right?

There are several OSM founders with more changes than you. Hell, there are bots with more changes than you.

“I know "perfectly" the goal of this map”
Again, relevance (sans fallacies)?

I've been familiar with OSM since before you were registered, because of it's goals. Knowing the goal, and working toward it (such as by following good practise) are two quite different things. No better than a criminal claiming to (merely) know the law.

“I'm not your TEACHER”
Good. Worthy teachers don't shout.

They also don't insult students who make sound arguments.

Refusing to teach makes a mockery of your earlier belittling of my having made fewer changes than you.

I choose to learn well, to do quality work, and the like. All you seem to have to offer, based on what you've said, is hostility & defensive irrationality. I've no need to learn that.

“I have deleted a VANDALISM near your ISLAND!”
Good for you. Have a 🌟.

As I said, I do surveying, so only concern myself with what's within the Bailiwick. The change which I think you're referring to is outside of it (in France). So, not really my concern.
Super-Map (2021-07-29 10:51:49+00:00): " see that you prefer quantity over quality"... You know NOTHING and I will close this "conversation" I haven't time for "you"! The "jealousy" isn't good you know... So if you like this project your fully FREE to learn more and do "better".  ..."I've been familiar with OSM since before"... So you must be better than everybody! I know what YOU want and YOU cant' expect ANYTHING about me like, certainly lot of other contributors who have enough SKILL and no count to render to you! so enjoy yourself and make "better" if you can...
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-27 16:21:29+00:00): Hallo redd,

so wie ich das mit building:part verstehe, hätte das anders gemappt werden müssen bzw. ergibt so keinen Sinn. Ich verstehe building:part so, dass man in einem Gebäude ein neues Gebäude einzeichnet und das mit building:part=yes taggt. Bzw in deinem Fall, müsstest du www.osm.org/way/47218137 erweitern, so dass es beide Gebäude umfasst. Und dann dein neues Gebäudeteil über den Teil des "Gesamtgebäudes" zeichnen.

Btw, es wird empfohlen die GEbäude(teile) zusätzlich in eine Relation zu schreiben. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108644635