piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_36790 (2021-07-09 19:27:45+00:00): Ik heb vanmiddag nog even gekeken.
Geen blauw bord met fietsje, wel een wit bord met rode rand en autootje.
dus verboden voor auto's.
het is een sluisdeur van het droogdok in het gebouw waar men overheen fietst van en naar werk.
A67-A67 (2021-07-13 10:54:41+00:00): Dat verkeersbord is bord C6. Volgens de Wiki zijn dan de correcte tags:
- motor_vehicle=no 
- motorcycle=yes 
- moped=yes & mofa=yes 
- traffic_sign=NL:C6 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden#C:_Geslotenverklaring
SekeRob (2021-07-13 11:17:00+00:00): De geen die weet waar de vermoedelijke 2 C6 exact staan en willens te mappen mag ze plaatsen, met facing direction. Ga geen pijltjes gooien.'o)
VictorIE (2022-05-06 16:09:49+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363912892

highway=footway is much more appropriate than service=alley for ways like this. There is literally a domestic front door at the entrance. It isn't big enough for 4-wheeled vehicles. :)
daganzdaanda (2021-07-01 22:24:09+00:00): Maybe it would make sense to connect the parking entrance to the road using a short "highway=service"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107229355
Lee Carré (2021-07-02 18:12:02+00:00): Ah (face-palm moment), I didn't even think of routing.

Quite right.
Lee Carré (2021-07-22 18:24:11+00:00): Remedied (finally) in changeset #108443542.
Famlam (2021-08-08 19:23:01+00:00): Dag Hans,

Ben je er zeker van dat de *naam* van de dierenweide ook "Dierenweide" is? M.a.w. staat er bijvoorbeeld een bordje "Welkom in dierenweide Dierenweide"?

Of is dit enkel een beschrijvende naam? In dat laatste geval hoort dit niet op OSM.
hansvanmeteren (2021-08-08 19:26:59+00:00): Het is enkel een beschrijvende naam. Sorry, dat onderscheid was me niet bekend (was geloof ik de eerste keer dat ik iets heb bijgedragen). Weet niet hoe ik dit ongedaan moet maken.
Famlam (2021-08-08 19:38:51+00:00): Geen probleem, alle begin is moeilijk! Alles is behoorlijk gedocumenteerd op de wiki (in dit specifieke geval https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names ), maar voor je de hele wiki kent ben je een paar jaar verder. Dus vooral doorgaan: van fouten kun je leren ;) en als het niet lukt om iets op te lossen, kunnen anderen helpen.
Iemand anders had bijvoorbeeld al de openingstijden gecorrigeerd voor jou: "24 hours" -> "24/7". https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59193417/history 

Je kunt in dit geval gewoon de "name"-tag weer verwijderen van het object. Of eventueel "name" wijzigen in "description", op dezelfde wijze als dat je hier "name", "operator" en dergelijke had toegevoegd.

(Het is trouwens de 5e keer dat je iets bijdraagt https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/hansvanmeteren/history ;) )
highflyer74 (2021-07-08 17:23:36+00:00): Moin PrinzZimt!

Danke für das detaillierte Mappen des Spielplatzes. Leider überlagern bzw. berühren sich hier einige Objekte nicht optimal, und es gibt eine MP Relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12234916), welche auch nicht wirklich notwendig ist. Die App Go Map!! hat leider kaum Funktionen, die den Mapper auf problematische Edits hinweist. Falls Du es mal mit einem besseren Editor am Computer versuchen möchtest, sei Dir JOSM empfohlen (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/).

Ansonsten hänge ich Dir noch ein tolles Tutorial als Link dran, welches Du Dir einmal durchlesen solltest, damit Du besser verstehst, wie sich einzelne Objekte zueinander verhalten:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst, melde Dich gern!
PrinzZimt (2021-07-08 20:29:33+00:00): Moin Highflyer74,
ich habe mir schon gedacht, dass da etwas nicht stimmt, weil man im Render die unterschiedlichen Flächen nicht sieht. Ich werde mir mal die Tutorials durchlesen und mich melden, falls ich das Problem nicht alleine behoben bekomme.

Besten Dank!
highflyer74 (2021-07-09 08:35:16+00:00): Hallo und danke für Deine Rückmeldung! Dass man das, was Du gemappt hast, nicht auf osm.org sieht, ist normal. Versuche, Dich von der Vorstellung zu lösen, eine Karte zu zeichnen. Wir editieren "nur" eine Datenbank, aus der hunderte verschiedene Karten entstehen. Deshalb ist es wichtig, dass Dinge neutral (also nach dem Wiki) gemappt sind und man die Entscheidung, was wie und ob etwas am Ende auf einer Karte dargestellt wird, dem Entwickler der Karte überlässt :-)
compdude (2021-07-01 01:18:21+00:00): It looks like you moved Der Man Shoppe by mistake, as it is now in the middle of Waterfront Park. Can you please try and fix it?

Thanks!
worlduser (2021-07-01 01:58:17+00:00): Hello,

I was adding the adding the address to the hotel.  I moved Der Man Shoppe by mistake.  I don't know where it goes.  Can you fix it for me?  Thank you.
compdude (2021-07-01 03:45:33+00:00): No problem, I've fixed it now.
JesseFTW (2021-11-19 13:01:01+00:00): It looks like you broke the relation for North Bay Shore in this edit -- could you clarify what the boundaries are that you meant to put, and fix it?
NKA (2021-12-31 07:51:56+00:00): Taggingen av bussfeltet i Jonsvannsveien som bus:lanes=yes|no|no|yes ble feil her. :lanes.-taggen må deles opp i forward og backward. I tillegg må rekkefølgen på yes og no snus (man skriver kjørefeltene fra venstre og mot høyre).

Riktig tagging skal være: bus:lanes:forward=|designated + motor_vehicle:lanes:forward=|no (og samme for backward).
TomCerts (2021-06-30 22:43:37+00:00): Edit: Building polygons moved as well
archie (2022-06-22 05:09:43+00:00): Hej, varför har du i det här changeset raderat åtskilliga sjömärken och navigationslinjer  (https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=107230934)? Det rör sig om sjömärken som fortfarande är giltiga. Sedan har du taggat ett sjömärke som rätteligen hör hemma utanför Simpevarp mitt i hamninloppet i Oskarshamn. Om man ser på ändringssetet så måste man konstatera att du målmedvetet har gått efter just sjömärkena. Dessa har ju ingenting att göra med ditt föregivna syfte att rita ändringarna av piren i Byxellkrok. Det här kan ju inte ses som ett misstag, utan som en ren vandalisering. Vänligen kommentera ovan stående.
archie (2022-06-25 14:04:55+00:00): Hela changeset har reverterats!
ZeLonewolf (2021-07-02 12:31:39+00:00): Hello Yocomik - as with the other changeset I commented on, it appears that you've downgraded MN 62 and MN 77 to trunk, however, they seem to meet the characteristics of a motorway.

Discussion at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ channel #local-minnesota
iey6Om7C (2021-07-02 08:27:20+00:00): Здравствуйте! Подскажите, пожалуйста, где можно найти разрешение на использование данных Госгисцентра? Исходя из этого обсуждения, я понял, что их использовать нельзя: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9512&p=3
iey6Om7C (2021-07-02 15:19:35+00:00): Откатил: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107318235
Andrea Musuruane (2021-07-01 07:49:47+00:00): Ciao. I nomi dei ponti si inseriscono sulla chiave bridge:name (e non su name). Per quanto riguarda "Via Ponte d'Agnona" io sui cartelli leggo "Via Ponte *di* Agnona". Ciao Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107231710
G_P_J (2021-07-06 07:12:06+00:00): Cześć, 
bardzo proszę abyś nie dodawał nazw miejscowości w znaczniku addr:city, jeśli jest to adres bez ulicy (wiejski). Do oznaczenia tego typu miejscowości służy znacznik addr:place. Twoje zmiany zduplikowały nazwę w dwóch znacznikach. W edytorze iD, którego używasz wszystkie znaczniki (tagi) puntu adresowego lub budynku znajdziesz po lewej stronie u dołu klikając "Wszystkie znaczniki". Pozdrawiam i życzę udanego mapowania. Piotr
Unhallowed (2021-07-07 23:21:39+00:00): Please continue adding homes and such, but please use the wiki to get the correct tag. For example the swimming pool should have been tagged as a swimming pool, not water.
daganzdaanda (2021-07-01 22:09:41+00:00): Looks good to me!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107232228
MxxCon (2021-07-01 01:36:29+00:00): hey. how come on some of your changeset comments you write C19?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107232598
daganzdaanda (2021-07-01 22:04:27+00:00): All's OK, but maybe the building outline could be squared. In ID and JOSM the key Q does this, in Vespucci it's a button with a right angle that looks a bit like an arrow. 

I haven't tried Vespucci yet, it's definitely on my to-do list ;-) But for editing and QA of bigger areas, using a computer with keyboard may be more comfortable. JOSM and ID also have a lot of  validation / QA checks included. E.g., I opened this area in ID and it complained about the driveway crossing the building (which was not changed in your edit). So it helps in finding such errors.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107233057
rivermont (2021-07-03 18:02:32+00:00): Hi,
Why did you upgrade Yam Blvd (w15871754) and River Rd to secondary? They looks like tertiary at best to me.
Milo (2021-07-03 19:38:18+00:00): The official federal classification of that section of Yam Blvd is major collection - I was just updating to match the other classifications in that area. Feel free to update it if you wish.
daganzdaanda (2021-07-01 21:47:37+00:00): Hi again Lee, 
one tiny hint: you can make a way square with a button in Vespucci (and in the other editors). This is helpful mostly for buildings.
Lee Carré (2021-07-02 04:29:29+00:00): I had looked for such a function, but must be missing it.

Right-angles for rectangular buildings would be much better.

Still getting to grips with the less trivial features of such a capable editor. Took me a while (and several cycles of editing attempt & undo) to figure out that the incantation to simply add a node to an existing way; it was simpler than I was assuming.

Like any good tool, Vespucci seems to offer the components; it's up to the tap-and-grunt ape to figure out which components to use in which combination & order.

But, hey; makes the moments of revelation / discovery all the more memorable. Firmer steps toward mastery.
Lee Carré (2021-07-02 04:34:57+00:00): Ah-ha; I was looking in the menu, when it's actually on the toolbar.

Right, will definitely be using that little gem in future (and, if I can recall them all, hopefully fixing my earlier attempts at adding buildings).
daganzdaanda (2021-07-01 21:41:40+00:00): Crazy detailed mapping! Very cool!
But the website says "Havre de Pas" as addr:street? That's a bit strange, for routing I would also guess "Greve d'Azette" should be the address.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107233630
kapazao (2022-10-22 08:23:26+00:00): Hola, creo que aquí los elementos que has puesto como valle son más bien arroyos intermitentes. Los barrancos en estos lugares suelen ser formados por vías fluviales. (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barranco_(geografía))
En imágenes satélite se aprecia el camino que queda de estas, que en la mayoría de los casos están sin agua.
No sé si conoces la zona de primera mano o dispones de medios para contrastarlo. Ya me comentas.
Un saludo.
lluvia2 (2022-10-22 08:39:21+00:00): Hola,
Creo que tienes razón. Siéntete libre de cambiarlos.
Un saludo.
juhimodel (2022-01-13 10:05:51+00:00): Booking now : +971558311835 Many people become nervous when the Sharjah escort arrives, especially if it's their first time trying the service of the hot . Want to Book Sharjah Escorts? Find the Top Female Call Girls in Sharjah at this Place We've 1000+ Indian, Russian, Moroccan, . #Dating Sharjah. new. Jenifar sharjah call girl O 5 5 8 3 1 1 835  Indian Call girl Escort Agency, Abu Dhabi, Sharjah, Ajm – 22. In the category Escorts Sharjah you can find 329 personals ads, e.g.: call girls, models or VIP escorts. Go straight to the ads now! Welcome to my page Sharjah Escort girls Agency // First Call ☎ +971558311835 ]

Service Charges:- 
1 hour 1000 (AED)
2 hours 1200 (AED) 
3 hours 1500 (AED)
Over Night 2000 (AED)

Call/WhatsApp : 0558311835 (Only Outcall)

Also visit Our Sites:-
https://www.archanabhabhi.com/indian-escorts-sharjah/ 
https://www.indian-juhi.com/escorts-service-near-hotel-sharjah.html 
https://www.archanabhabhi.com 

Tags :- #CallGirlsAgencysharjah #EscortsAgencysharjah #IndependentEscortsinsharjah #FemaleEscortssharjah #sharjahCallGirlsService #EscortsServicesharjah
Tommybara (2023-11-05 00:15:44+00:00): See my comments for the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66050656

At this point, when I noticed the vandalism edits, he had been doing this for about 3 years.
ndm (2021-07-02 19:18:59+00:00): Redrawing - I think you've put the road through a building (on Bing).
madnikhi (2021-07-06 06:32:49+00:00): Hi ndm, 
Apologies for the genuine miss from my end. The building was quite not clear from the aerial imagery and I mistook it to be a heavy vehicle as there is no photo overlay. Thanks for correcting my edit. Good day!
Regards,
madnikhi
ralley (2021-07-01 19:01:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. A quick pointer: many buildings in NZ consist only of 90 degree corners. You can enforce this in the Id editor by selecting the outline, right clicking and choosing "Square" (shortcut "Q").
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107233890
MxxCon (2021-07-02 01:52:18+00:00): Hello.
Why did you move fountain POI to the middle of pedestrian area? That doesn't seem to be correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107233960
worlduser (2021-07-01 02:47:06+00:00): Thank you for fixing my mistake!
compdude (2021-07-01 03:53:39+00:00): No problem; it's iD's fault for making it too easy to accidentally drag nodes. 
BTW, OSMCha is a really helpful website that gives people a more in-depth look at how things changed in a changeset, and is what showed me where Der Man Shoppe was before you moved it.
Warin61 (2021-07-02 07:47:31+00:00): Hi
Way 959936573 - building .. has an error .. two segments share a path. What you have tired to do is make a hole in the building.. that cannot be done with a simple way. The normal method of making a hole in some thing is to use a multipolygon relation, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
I leave it to you to fix.
BidgeeWagga (2021-07-03 05:56:41+00:00): Hope it has been fixed in #107339930
iWowik (2021-07-04 04:12:38+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Выполняйте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании дорог
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
aweech (2021-07-01 23:09:02+00:00): Hi,
I reviewed your edit, as you requested. I couldn't get past the fact that you copied from Google Maps. Contributors to OpenStreetMap are not allowed to copy from Google Maps. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F for more information.
SvM (2022-01-09 05:37:08+00:00): Может уже открыли дорогу около автокинотетра?
fndoder (2022-01-09 07:17:38+00:00): Возможно. Планирую посетить эти места летом, уточню статус.
Прошлым летом там сложилось впечатление, что ремонт длительный, поэтому и пометил как construction.
fndoder (2022-08-05 17:31:18+00:00): Дорога готова, открыта. Снял construction, более неактуальный объезд по полю понизил до track.
rah_em (2021-07-02 12:05:42+00:00): Hi angys, 
I have alligned the service highway as per ground reality. Kindly refer this way 642118576, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107309586
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107235452
angys (2021-07-02 12:28:50+00:00): Ok.no problem
Shaun das Schaf (2021-07-03 09:56:43+00:00): Hallo Ginel48,

du hast bei diesem Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284676984
den Tag "highway=track" zu "highway=footway" geändert.

Wie ist der Weg denn ausgeschildert?
Mit einem Schild "Motorfahrzeuge verboten" oder mit einem Schild "Fussweg" mit Zusatzzeichen "Fahrräder frei"?

Nur in letzterem Fall wäre "highway=footway" richtig.

Viele Grüsse
Shaun das Schaf
Allison P (2021-07-08 03:38:54+00:00): You removed a lot of landuse and roads under construction in this changeset, can you explain?
archpdx (2021-07-08 04:13:57+00:00): Hi,

As Allison noted, some of the roads under construction I've added within this bbox have been removed in this changeset, most likely accidentally. Readding these would be much appreciated.

-archpdx
snarkyclarky (2021-07-15 03:57:36+00:00): Hey there, I seemingly removed these items because they had no valid satellite or website references. I'd be happy to restore them with a valid reference. Thank you!
anebophil (2021-07-09 17:50:39+00:00): 
Hello! how are you? Thanks for the changes! Please pay a little attention, the routes you modify belong to route relations
Embajadores (2021-07-09 22:51:45+00:00): Hello, I am doing well, I hope you are too. I will mind the relations. Thank you for contacting me and editing bus route 33.
SafetyIng (2021-07-01 07:43:53+00:00): Ich würde gerne mal an "service=driveway" erinnern.
Und wie kann ein parking_aisle existieren, ohne dass dort ein Parkplatz ist?
madnikhi (2021-07-02 12:18:31+00:00): Hi Safetying, 
Apologies for the misinterpretation of the driveway here. I have now changed the highway tag to driveway. About the parking_aisle, I have added it as there seems to be a parking lot visible in Bing and Esri imagery. Please let me know your inputs regarding the parking_aisle. Happy to learn from you. 
Regards,
madnikhi
daganzdaanda (2021-07-01 21:30:57+00:00): Hi Lee, I'm following up on your request for reviews :-)

I'm impressed at the detailed tagging of those substations. Well done! 
Since I'm not an expert on power mapping, I was looking at the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=substation and maybe a "substation=*" tag could be added if you find out what kind of substation these are (minor_distribution?). Or might power=transformer fit even better for small installations?

Maybe for economy, you could just use one "source=survey", since all the facts come from your survey. Only if some tag has another source, that could be indicated with a separate source:x=y
Also, I think official_name is not needed since it's the same as the main "name". 
But these things are a matter of taste (like much OSM tagging...)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107236548
Lee Carré (2021-07-02 00:06:40+00:00): “following up on your request for reviews”
👍
Much appreciated.

There's a few different categories, so I'll post a few separate comments in response.

“I'm impressed at the detailed tagging of those substations. Well done!”
Thanks. That feels flattering, as a novice.

I noticed the stark lack of most any infrastructure (mapped) on the island, and since it's an interest, decided to take it on. Most of the ones marked in Jersey are my additions. Though I'm sure you're already familiar, I'll mention Open Infrastructure Map, which is a helpful rendering (e.g. of their geographic distribution), and for re-finding them easily.

Town is easier; mostly a case of wandering around (doing other things) and taking notice when I happen upon another. Amusingly, surveying at night has yielded quite a few discoveries; when it's quiet just gotta listen for & follow the buzzing 😄.

This is why, if you're trawling through my changeset history, you'll notice that adding a substation is interspersed among unrelated changesets. I mostly discover them as I go. Some are well-hidden (or, at least, inconspicuous) or in odd locations. Often it's the standardised JEC hazard triangle notice which catches my eye and gives away their hiding spot.

My hope, eventually, is that with the nodes of the network well-surveyed, an experienced infrastructure mapper might be able to figure out how (in terms of cabling) they're inter-connected. There's another mapper, with a stated interest in infrastructure, who added the newest link from France (from where most of Jersey's electricity comes, La Collette is more of a backup) that may be promising for such a task.

The countryside parishes will be the troublesome areas; lesser density, and less easy to spot (more places to hide them).
Lee Carré (2021-07-02 00:10:50+00:00): I suppose, also, as motivation; Jersey being small and finite (a very clear natural geographical boundary, rather than merely a line on a map running across the land), it's not unrealistic to actually achieve ‘fully complete’ mapping status.

Maybe, then, the JEC itself could be encouraged to maintain that aspect of OSM since they hold all the data internally.
Lee Carré (2021-07-02 02:17:47+00:00): “a matter of taste (like much OSM tagging...)”
Yes, that's becoming more apparent from certain other sources. I recall an argument of sorts over (for the likes of bus stops) passenger_information_display versus departures_board.

Though, sometimes new ideas can be very constructive; I recall reading the history of why diet:* came about, due to the problems of ambiguity from trying to use cuisine=* for multiple types of data.
daganzdaanda (2021-07-02 13:22:11+00:00): Thank you for all your thoughts in all the replies, this has been very interesting for me. I see that you have very good reasoning behind what you do! Also, I'm getting a glimpse into local culture and attitude ;-) 

One nice thing about OSM is that it's very open for all interests and very much a "do-ocracy". This can be a bit confusing for data users and for new mappers, who both may wish for clearer and more consistent rules everywhere. But I think the openness and flexibility is a big part of the success and fun of OSM.
topius (2021-07-01 07:50:10+00:00): Great edits, thank you. Please note, however, that villages should be named only with their name, not with "village" added. So it is Maur, not Maur village. I corrected it already.
SafetyIng (2021-07-01 08:05:56+00:00): Do you know amenity=driveway?
madnikhi (2021-07-02 08:39:06+00:00): Hi SafetyIng, 
Thanks for checking my edits. I have added service=driveway tag as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107298892) with suggested modifications. 
Regards, 
madnikhi
351293 (2021-07-01 09:32:08+00:00): As the other changesets i also reverted this one.
STOP changing ways, without paying attention to the notes added to them!
SafetyIng (2021-07-01 07:44:41+00:00): driveway?
madnikhi (2021-07-02 08:37:11+00:00): Hi SafetyIng, 
Thanks for looking into my edits. I have now added highway=service as suggested. Please find the changeset with modifications (107298782). Happy to learn from you. 
Regards,
madnikhi
abakus_uploader (2021-07-01 22:31:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!