piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2019-10-10 14:57:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I suppose you had some help entering this data. The guy who helped you unfortunately has very bad knowledge of OSM, so your data was deleted as SEO SPAM.If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
gpage (2019-10-10 05:37:06+00:00): **Actually added soccer field
Branko Kokanovic (2019-10-13 21:33:18+00:00): reverted as those restaurant certainly don't have name in Chinese, which is borderline vandalism. Please don't tag them like this
aachso (2019-10-10 09:17:53+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please tag this as disused (using disued:leisure=sports_centre) and set the opening_hours to off, or just remove them completely.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:

Thanks!
abakus_uploader (2019-10-10 22:30:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
GOwin (2019-10-22 23:22:17+00:00): A secondary road class for these highways are too high. Barangay access roads are typically tagged as tertiary roads, and roads leading to remote sitios as unclassified.

Kindly refer to the Philippine Mapping Convention for guidance: https://.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions
PT-53 (2019-10-10 09:39:46+00:00): Hallo  FlatEarther333,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz das Gebäude Platzstzraße 22 in zwei Gebäude aufgeteilt und die Daten der POI-Knoten von dm und KIK auf die neuen Gebäude übertragen.
Gem. Maps4BW handelt es sich nur um ein Gebäude. Ich habe Deine Änderungen daher wieder zurückgesetzt.
Grüße
FlatEarther333 (2019-10-10 09:52:41+00:00): Das waren keine zwei gebäude sondern zwei Ladenflächen. Hab ich das Gebäudetag nicht entfernt?
PT-53 (2019-10-10 10:38:16+00:00): Oh, sorry. Das hatte ich falsch interpretiert.
indoor=shop als Ladenfläche entspricht aber auch nicht dem Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:indoor?uselang=de
Da wäre doch building:part passender, oder?
Warst Du eigentlich vor Ort und hast die Flächen ausgemessen, oder anhand welcher Quellen hast Du die Aufteilung vorgenommen?
Grüße
FlatEarther333 (2019-10-10 11:21:33+00:00): bulding:part ist es auf keinen Fall. Manchmal wird es als indoor = room gemacht. Aber wenn shop angeboten wird dachte ich das ist am passendsten. In diesem Fall habe ich es nach Fotos gemappt. Außerdem sieht man die Eingänge durch das graue Pflaster davor. 

VG
PT-53 (2019-10-10 11:24:46+00:00): PS:
Wenn in einem Gebäude mehrere Geschäfte untergebracht sind, ist es ja durchaus üblich diese mit separaten POI-Knoten zu kennzeichnen. So war es vor Deiner Änderung und so ist es nun wieder.
FlatEarther333 (2019-10-10 11:55:41+00:00): Aber genau das soll ja nicht so bleiben.
Openstreetmap soll sich auch in den indoor-Bereich ausdehnen. Das ist jetzt nur ein kleiner Fall, aber darf ebenfalls sein.

https://blog.openstreetmap.org/tag/indoormaps/
PT-53 (2019-10-10 13:57:37+00:00): Unter Indoor-Mapping verstehe ich aber (sehr) detaillliertes Mapping. Warst Du vor Ort, ist da jeweils nur ein einzelner Raum?
PT-53 (2019-10-10 14:02:26+00:00): PS:
Wo steht, daß das nicht so bleiben soll / darf?
PerplexingPenguins (2019-10-11 03:46:19+00:00): Is this not a driveway? Also, why has this changeset removed a tag from a church?
owoowo (2019-10-11 06:44:59+00:00): @ PerplexingPenguins The church is a Mormon church, not Christian church as it was tagged, and thus a place of worship rather than a Christian specific location. As for the driveway, that's a sidewalk beside the driveway not a driveway. You can see this on google images as well
owoowo (2019-10-11 06:45:49+00:00): *Google maps not images, derp
PerplexingPenguins (2019-10-11 17:45:19+00:00): The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints represents a denomination of Christianity, so religion=christian is correct.

As far as I can tell, there is a road here running next to the houses, which you have converted into a sidewalk. A sidewalk can be tagged separately.

Also note that Google Maps is not allowed as a source due to copyright restrictions.
PerplexingPenguins (2019-10-11 17:45:34+00:00): I'm going to revert this changeset
owoowo (2019-10-11 19:42:48+00:00): @ PerplexingPenguins My source isn't google maps, I just referenced it so you could view it. My source is living in this subdivision for over 20 years and knowing its layout and people personally. As long as the sidewalk remains then sure do whatever. There's MUCH more of that sidewalk as well that loops all around that I haven't had time to fully map out.
user_5359 (2019-10-10 14:58:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I suppose you had some help entering this data. The guy who helped you unfortunately has very bad knowledge of OSM, so your data was deleted as SEO SPAM.If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Glassman (2019-10-10 15:55:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I fixed a number of footways that crossed through buildings and roads. From the imagery it didn't look like the path went through the building instead when between buildings. Imagery offset might be part of the problem. Also when a footway crosses a street it should be connected to allow routers to do their thing. I'll send you more info on OSM in a PM.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 07:23:56+00:00): Hello!

You used
network=Lcn
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518166726/history

Have you maybe meant
network=lcn
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
Tomas Straupis (2019-10-10 12:56:07+00:00): Atstačiau teisingą kūdros žymėjimą landuse=basin.
Mir76 (2020-03-26 07:40:13+00:00): Здравствуйте!
А почему вы решили, что улица Водоемная идет по этой временной бетонке?
!bm (2020-06-07 11:05:23+00:00): Hallo atpl_pilot,

der Tower sieht da aber etwas in Mitleidenschaft gezogen aus? Deckt sich nicht mit Berlin Zoom bzw meiner bescheidenen Wahrnehmung. 

--besteGrüße!bm
atpl_pilot (2020-06-08 09:26:56+00:00): @!ibm Du sagst es: "Mit Deinen bescheidenen Wahrnehmungen"

Vergleiche hierzu: https://fbinter.stadt-berlin.de/fb/index.jsp

Wähle z.B. die Karte "Berlin-Zoom"

Aber Dir zuliebe habe ich den rechten Gang vom Terminal C am Tower enden lassen, sodass Du die Form des Towers besser erkennst (wobei die Abmessungen bzw. sich an der Grundlinie des Towers nichts geändert hat).
!bm (2020-06-08 09:58:03+00:00): Vielen Dank für die freundliche Antwort – die von mir durchaus wörtlich gemeinte Bescheidenheit meiner Wahrnehmung bitte ich vielmals zu entschuldigen. Genau, anhand Berlin Zoom war mir die Abweichung aufgefallen, wie ich ja eingangs anmerkte – entweder stimmen die öffentlichen Quellen nicht, oder meine Wahrnehmung (oder auch beide). (Das eigene "local knowledge" ist oft eine trügerische Quelle.) Ich hoffe, es ist jetzt richtig(er) und nicht bloß (m)einer ästhetischen Ideal-Vorstellung aufgrund der ikonischen Form der oberen Stockwerke geschuldet. Schön, dass du auch gleich einige andere Dinge präzisieren konntest – besten Dank für deine Änderungen! 
--besteGrüße!bm
ndm (2019-10-10 09:29:49+00:00): Changing the imagery layer to ESRI clarity might help you to get more detail / split into individual properties. You can see elsewhere in Bristol that mappers have tried to add individual addresses.
Tomas Straupis (2019-10-10 12:59:45+00:00): Atšauktas pakeitimas. Kūdra žymima landuse=basin.
eggie (2019-10-10 08:17:57+00:00): Tip..
Dag Johan,
Nu staat de school 2x in de database. je kunt ook één terrein met de tag amenity=school over de twee schoolterreinen trekken en daar 1x de naam op zetten. 
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
Thibault Rommel (2021-06-01 08:01:05+00:00): Hallo, de Kleiebeek loopt door heel wat straten en huizen. Gelieve de beek op te splitsen en de ondergrondse stukken als dusdanig aan te duiden.
eggie (2019-10-10 08:44:58+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode


MVG,
Eggie
abakus_uploader (2019-10-10 22:30:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ciaranodc (2019-10-10 20:32:20+00:00): Hi Simon. Directions still won't go past this gate. Any idea why it's still not working?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=53.38600%2C-6.06060%3B53.38580%2C-6.05990#map=16/53.3829/-6.0541&layers=N
ciaranodc (2019-10-10 20:54:36+00:00): We just have to wait until the changes replicate through is it? Any idea how long that usually takes?
SimonPoole (2019-10-10 21:09:19+00:00): Probably needs a full 24 hours before we panic :-).
ciaranodc (2019-10-10 21:25:33+00:00): But I've already ordered more troops to the panic stations! I'd better call them off so.
SimonPoole (2019-10-11 08:18:10+00:00): Works for the OSRM instance now, graphhopper doesn't seem to have updated yet.
SimonPoole (2019-10-11 08:22:06+00:00): I have noticed a further issue there, the pavement / footway / sidewalk along the left hand side of the road is missing a lot of connections to roads and paths branching off Balscadden Road making it as is practically unusable for routing.
ciaranodc (2019-10-11 13:50:54+00:00): I will delete that footpath. It's causing problems and not solving any. Thanks.
SimonPoole (2019-10-11 14:32:28+00:00): I would replace it with tagging (sidewalk=left).
user_5359 (2019-10-10 15:17:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2019-10-10 15:19:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
JoeG (2019-10-19 01:19:41+00:00): What is the URL/full name of the actmapi list, and when was it last updated?
TheSwavu (2019-10-19 01:54:17+00:00): http://data.actmapi.act.gov.au/arcgis/rest/services/data_extract/Community_Facilities_and_Assets/MapServer/0

Dataset is October 2018. Existence of BBQ was checked against June 2019 aerial imagery in town or 2017 imagery otherwise.
JoeG (2019-10-19 02:01:22+00:00): Thanks! Just came across some bbqs I had added on the ground in the last 6mo that now said they needed checking.
TheSwavu (2019-10-19 02:28:11+00:00): OK. I added fixmes to about 20 of the BBQs that were already mapped: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/NgG. I only removed a BBQ if it was obvious from the imagery that they'd been removed. I think the ones around the lake that are visible on the imagery but not on the list may be maintained by the NCA, although the ones in Surveyors Park appear to have ACT Government markings but aren't on the list.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-21 21:23:45+00:00): To jest w budowie czy tylko planowane?
Anton Khorev (2019-10-27 22:31:33+00:00): Магазин внутри здания - это не здание.
eggie (2019-10-10 09:24:03+00:00): Dg Vice Versa. Goed dat je de zaken actueel houdt. De openingsuren heb je er nog wel opstaan. Moeten die er niet ook af?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=75499560
MVG,
Eggie
Davy_670 (2019-10-10 09:37:37+00:00): Daar heb je een punt Eggie! ik heb hem wederom gewijzigd en de openingstijden gewist.
user_11166885 (2020-07-06 15:57:24+00:00): Denominazione errata
Jrachi (2019-10-11 07:48:17+00:00): Vedo dalla cronologia che ti sei limitato ad aggiungere due tag, però aggiungendo un errore all'esistente.
L'edificio è un building e andrebbe aggiunto il tipo (yes è generico, oppure house se abitazione, ecc,) mentre il tag place va messo come nodo a se stante con le indicazioni di indirizzo e popolazione.
Mettere il dato sulla popolazione può sembrare utile ma come fai a mantenerlo? Consulti l'anagrafe ogni mese?
Sarebbe più utile e mantenibile un link ad una pagina web, ad esempio:
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgex
Comunque sia, vedo che sei tornato a mappare. Continua così!
ToniE (2019-10-10 12:32:34+00:00): Danke Robert,

ich bin dort vor ein paar Jahren mal mit dem Radl lang, als die Radwege"Kapellen-und-Kirchen" und "Naturradweg" gemapped habe 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75467171#map=16/47.9418/11.6321&layers=C

Ich würde noch eine weitere kleinere Änderung vornehmen ...

Wenn das Haus einer gemischten Nutzung unterliegt "wohnen", "Office", so wird das Office in der Regel nicht an den Hausumriß sondern an einen eigenen Punkt innerhalb des Hause gemapped

name="HR-SorfCom"
office=it    (oder sehr allgemein =company)

Man könnte noch sehr viel mehr Informationen mappen ...

contact:phone="+49 8xxx yyyy"
contact:website="https://...."
contact:email="...."
contact:fax="+49 8xxx yyyy"
contact:facebook=
contact:xxx=
operator=...
opening_hours="Mo-Fr 09:00-18:00; Sa,Su,PH closed"     (als Beispiel für shops)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features

Gruß
Toni
Alhamdulillah (2019-12-16 23:48:54+00:00): AND LOTS OF BAD TRACING BY jamesks
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=75501057
jamesks (2020-02-28 09:44:44+00:00): That is just your poinion. Mapping is always inaccurate - one starts with straight lines between nodes and collaboratively make it more accurate. I spend 90% of my mapping time improving the accuracy of other people's edits.
Branko Kokanovic (2019-10-13 21:31:37+00:00): reverted as those restaurant use invalid mail and have name in Chinese, which is borderline vandalism
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-10-15 17:16:43+00:00): Boa tarde, qual a fonte para adicionar este nome?
eduardi (2019-10-15 21:53:35+00:00): boa noite, é o nome do monte conhecido por cá, devido à semelhança de um cu grande, sou de Melres pode confiar
DaveF (2019-10-10 19:39:07+00:00): What tag was preventing PSVs from using these roads?
Rick Wiles (2019-10-11 05:25:27+00:00): The road is tag as Motor Vehicles = destination, this stops PSV vehicles in our system using it. I either have to set it to motor vehicles yes, or psv yes.
DaveF (2019-10-11 17:02:44+00:00): I believe there are two separate issues here:

1. I don't think your software should throw an error for 'destination' as the station is, after all, the bus's destination.

2. I don't think destination is appropriate on these ways as there's no signs (AFAIK) indicating restricted access to the station & car parks. There should be (& is) a destination tag for the stretch of road behind the multi-storey where there is a 'no through road' sign
Rick Wiles (2019-10-14 06:15:54+00:00): The only thing I can say to this is, as our software developers deal  with OSM all over Europe, I think they are far more knowledgeable than me. They say that if the road is designated as you have then it needs a tag to allow PSV.
DaveF (2019-10-14 10:03:01+00:00): I think they're misunderstanding. Do you have an email contact for them?
Rick Wiles (2019-10-14 10:46:57+00:00): I didn’t set the motor vehicle = destination, This is something that someone else has set. When our routes where doing straight lines we asked for advice from our software suppliers. They have come back and said that because the motor vehicles were set as they are it needs psv= yes. If as you say the road shouldn’t be set as motor vehicles = destination, then I can change it to motor vehicles = yes and take psv = yes off.
DaveF (2019-10-14 13:15:38+00:00): I'm fully aware you didn't add the tag.
I still think your suppliers are confused.
motor_vehicle=destination allows buses and taxis access to the area, but there's a no through road beyond that.

Do you have contact details for your suplliers?
Rick Wiles (2019-10-14 13:32:45+00:00): I can't send you there contact details without their permission, and I don’t have it anyway, This is also going through my manager and the destination tag was in error on our part. It seems it’s the tag Permissive that is the problem. However this is what we have from them, they are German so allow for the translation. 

"The Software OSM developers looked into the import configuration and you must give the street the tag bus=yes or psv=yes. 

If the tag highway = service and access = permissive is set in OSM, then no bus can drive there. 

Since here the traffic is only tolerated and there is generally no license for it. All highways on the Station have this tag combination.  So if you allow the bus this street without the tag bus=yes, they can drive over the streets from the Station. Therefore, please put the above tags."
mueschel (2019-10-14 08:16:07+00:00): Hi,
was heißt denn "arena=yes" an diesem Parkplatz? Das Tag gibt es sonst nicht.
Gruß
Jan
RobertSteffens (2019-10-14 12:43:43+00:00): Keine Ahnung wo das hergekommen ist. Ich entferne es.
Bye
Robert
Gerold (2019-10-11 20:53:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
timmito (2019-10-11 00:11:33+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Wenn dort ein Weg ist, sollte dieser auch in OSM erfasst werden. Zugangsbeschränkungen können mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access erfasst werden.
Paul_Freude (2019-10-11 08:10:26+00:00): Hallo,
naja, das Problem ist, dass dieser Weg ohne Genehmigung angelegt wurde und die Nutzung eigentlich für niemandem erlaubt ist. Wenn er jetzt in einer Karte auftaucht wird er auch gesucht und das kann zu Konflikten mit Forst/Jagd/... führen.
timmito (2019-10-11 17:44:06+00:00): Für dieses Problem ist der Forst verantwortlich, nicht OpenStreetMap. OSM bildet die Wirklichkeit ab. Sollte die Benutzung wirklich verboten sein, dann mit access=no taggen, der Weg wir dann in den meisten Karten weniger auffallend gerendert und von Routenplanern gemieden.
Jakka (2019-10-10 19:52:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89989741#map=16/50.2098/4.2640&layers=N
foot est standard permis sur un "track"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Belgium
Branko Kokanovic (2019-10-13 21:31:42+00:00): reverted as those restaurant use invalid mail and have name in Chinese, which is borderline vandalism
tesp (2019-10-11 13:33:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution! I was just wondering, is the "1" in the name of "Ege Kebab Pizzeria 1" actually a part of the name of the restaurant or is it a house number on display?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-15 11:25:52+00:00): Hello,
Just to let you know, 
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=204513926 has been "source=Google Maps" since version 1.  If you're happy that there's basically nothing left of the original Google Maps data I'd suggest removing that tag from it and other similar roads round here (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/QJr is a list).  If you're not, leave it and we'll delete it later.
I've just done a revert of a number of changesets that included Google-sourced data starting at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80608729 , but where other mappers have edited the data since (like this road) I haven't yet done anything.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
user_5359 (2019-10-10 15:25:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-10-10 10:31:15+00:00): UKR: realigned existing ways
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-10-10 10:30:58+00:00): UKR: realigned existing ways
arcanma (2019-10-31 18:52:08+00:00): Welcome Hessimonx. Thanks for the contribution to map. The passage from Piazza Grande was not joined to Via Galeotti, I joined it.
nadol (2019-10-10 10:32:10+00:00): Żabka oczywiście
viloan (2019-10-10 10:45:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
sinreeya (2019-10-14 15:49:47+00:00): Hi,

I have used Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery to make the edits in this changeset 75507271.

Regards,
Sinreeya
Ser9ei (2021-09-26 09:34:37+00:00): Откуда взята информация? На бинге нет этих строений. На других снимках тоже.