piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pbnoxious (2018-07-11 20:51:46+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deine Eintragung. Nachdem du "review_requested" angegeben hast: Das eingezeichnete Haus überschneidet sich teilweise mit den angrenzenden (was in der Realität nicht so sein dürfte ;-) ). Grundsätzlich gilt: wenn die Gebäude tatsächlich "Wand-an-Wand" sind, zeichne sie ruhig auch als solche ein. Ich habe das hier jetzt mal gemacht.
AndreasR61 (2018-07-12 10:12:51+00:00): Dies sind halt meine ersten Schritte in OpenStreetMap und ich möchte ja schließlich keine groben Fehler machen. Danke für die freundliche Hilfe!
Rodrigo Rega (2018-07-15 12:18:56+00:00): Hola,

Por favor, ten en cuenta que la etiqueta "name" solo debe usar para nombres oficiales. Por ejemplo, en el caso de esta edición si quieres añadir "Duchas y aseos públicos gratuitos" puedes usar la etiqueta "description". Lo he corregido.

Un saludo y gracias por tus aportaciones al mapa.
eggie (2018-07-11 15:13:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
viloan (2018-07-11 14:48:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pbnoxious (2018-07-11 20:30:23+00:00): Also kann man selbst wenn das Tor offen ist nicht zur Albert-Funk-Schacht-Straße fahren? Und "Tor" im name-tag ist vermutlich überflüssig, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
BAK365 (2018-07-12 11:53:07+00:00): Bonjour,
veuillez noter que nous ne pouvons utiliser que des sources de données libres ou autorisées pour alimenter OSM. Recycling-map.ch n'entre pas dans cette catégorie, à moins qu'il n'y ait un accord ( https://recycling-map.ch/fr/info/?detail=conditions-generales-6 ).
ibanez (2018-07-12 19:55:03+00:00): Hi, I'm a local mapper from Gifhorn. The two buildings 8442018 and 607100927 in Baugebiet "Lindenhof" drawn by your changeset were demolished a year ago, but they are still visible on satellite images. Also the street line 571704933 has changed in reality and was correct until your changeset. BR Jens
Hjart (2018-07-12 20:32:52+00:00): Hi. Thank you for your feedback and sorry for these and any other mistakes I may have done here.
I always take great care to check the history and source of objects I'm working with and it indeed did become apparent to me that you were mapping things that did not appear in the imagery I was working with.
Rather than delete buildings that are still visible in current imagery, I like to add the prefix "demolished:" as explained in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. Experienced mappers at least will notice this and not redraw such buildings. Also when road layout has changed from what is currently visible I like to explicitly state when "start_date=* " and what sources was used, so that armchair mappers like myself do have a fair chance at knowing what not to touch.
ibanez (2018-07-13 19:46:23+00:00): I would agree to your approach for single buildings within normal landuse. In this case the buildings are on an area marked as "brownfield" annotated with a note that all buildings are demolished except for number 144 (changeset  #30504226)
Hjart (2018-07-11 15:49:55+00:00): Jo der gør. Den var bare ikke korrekt oversat. Det har jeg dog rettet nu.
Tntdruid (2018-07-11 15:50:25+00:00): Mange tak
viloan (2018-07-11 15:39:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-07-11 17:25:38+00:00): Top... prima zo!
Mammi71 (2018-07-12 21:36:01+00:00): Hallo da-sch,
Du hast u.a. die Kläranlage in Wieck a. Darß gemappt. Die Klärbecken wurden von Dir als landuse=basin gemappt. Dies sollte m.E. jedoch eher für Regenwasserrückhaltebecken verwendet werden. Klärbecken sind eher mit natural=water + water=wastewater zu taggen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dbasin und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dwastewater_plant

Der Mammi
Carto'Cité (2018-07-20 10:36:13+00:00): Bonjour RB94.
J'ai vu que vous avez ajouté le way https://www.osm.org/way/607109513 pour une voie réservée aux bus et vélos. Celle-ci est déjà correctement représentée par le way https://www.osm.org/way/38165980 avec le tag busway:left=opposite_lane.
La seule raison de créer un way séparé serait qu'il s'agit de chaussées séparées, infranchissable physiquement même par un vélo. Cela ne semble pas être le cas d'après la BD Ortho : qu'en est-il réellement sur le terrain ?
Antoine de Carto'Cite pour le projet #CartoVeloIDF
Carto'Cité (2018-07-20 12:43:41+00:00): Au passage, merci de mettre des commentaires de changesets plus explicites que "J'ai fait quelque modifications bien précisés", quitte à décrire de manière adhoc les modifications. Ce n'est pas superflu, cela aide la communauté OSM à comprendre les modifications des autres contributeurs.
Merci d'avance,
Antoine.
pbnoxious (2018-07-11 20:33:20+00:00): Aber an sich gibt es den Pfad doch, oder? Dann lieber den Pfad oder das Tor mit access=private taggen als den Pfad komplett herauszunehmen.
JeroenHoek (2018-07-11 19:35:24+00:00): Zou je de voetgangerstrap weer op zijn plaats kunnen zetten? (sleepfoutje?)
dvdhoven (2018-07-12 05:22:20+00:00): Mijn excuses. Ik had het niet gezien. Dat lijkt me een laadfoutje. Ik heb deze changeset reverted en de trap lijkt weer op zijn plek te liggen.

Groet,
Dick van den Hoven
Glassman (2018-07-12 22:41:38+00:00): We've been having a discussion on changing the ref on the way. The concensus is that the US:I should only be used on the relation, instead of the way. The reason is too many renderers use older method. Can you change them back or do you want me to revert these I5 changesets?

If you haven't joined us on Slack, please do - Sign up at https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60621634
avuton (2018-07-12 23:01:00+00:00): Oh, that's unfortunate, just went with what I saw on the wiki. Please revert if you have the time, I'll be AFK for a bit. Thanks for the word!
Glassman (2018-07-13 00:05:03+00:00): Reverted.

I've been doing this since 2011, and I still had to ask. It's not an obvious situation. I limit my self to bike routes and adding the occasional roundabout to existing route relations. They are a pain. I'm also going to be gone for a while. I plan to hold a meetup when I get back in September. I hope you can make it. You can sign up to my meetup at https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Central-Salish-Sea/
mavl (2018-07-23 07:54:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
mueschel (2018-07-12 09:25:40+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tag "tract_geoid=48201311700" you added on 850 buildings? This looks like a mistake to me.

Jan
cammace (2018-07-12 13:08:53+00:00): The building geometries came from the Bing Buildings footprint. I specifically used the files produced in this process https://gist.github.com/iandees/a5ab382a13099bfad615d213ec588e6a.
mueschel (2018-07-12 13:16:46+00:00): The geometries look fine, but I think that this tag shouldn't be there.
user_2066394 (2022-08-17 14:46:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607110535
Gibt's da noch Erinnerungsfragmente, wie die Routennavigation durch das Haus durch gedacht war?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235754182
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:52:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Carnildo (2018-07-12 06:14:45+00:00): The usual tags for the roads in/accessing a parking lot are "Parking aisle", "Driveway", or if you're not sure how to classify it, the generic "Service road".
Frans S (2018-07-23 10:34:42+00:00): Hello.  A quick remark
Please read the mapping instructions and how to map again. 
You don't map buildings,  only an area around them. This is not what is should be.
Thanks
NancyBowens (2018-07-23 13:03:25+00:00): Fran I'm confused by your statement - we're not supposed to map buildings?
Frans S (2018-07-23 15:47:28+00:00): Hi, Yes, Buildings is the subject.
But, you called them area=yes
I try to recall the changeset to show you.
Frans S (2018-07-23 15:56:00+00:00): take a look here 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60622078.   When you open it  in ID  Tag edit on top of the page you will see the correction.  This is what you originally mapped
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60622078
You can see a wide square around the buildings.
I hope it is clear now for you
Best regards
Frans
mavl (2018-07-20 15:51:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
user_5359 (2018-07-11 18:31:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
mr2autoxr (2018-07-12 00:38:36+00:00): I went through and added the addr:street and addr:housenumber! to those additions I made.
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:43:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:37:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
viloan (2018-07-11 16:48:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Carnildo (2018-07-12 06:41:36+00:00): Normally, a large river such as the Stillwater or the Flathead is mapped in two parts: an area or multipolygon tracing the banks, and a line down the middle following the path of greatest flow.  The "River" tag and the name of the river go on the the central line, while the outer edge is tagged as "Riverbank".

It looks like whoever added the Stillwater didn't do the second part: the central line for the Stillwater ends right where he started adding the riverbank.
FrancyskoMarkes (2018-07-11 16:56:15+00:00): PI-143 entre Conceição do Canindé e Jacobina do Piauí encontra-se asfaltada de acordo com esta notícia: 

http://fabionascimentonoticias.blogspot.com/2014/03/governo-do-estado-inaugura-54-km-da.html
Skinfaxi (2018-08-05 10:31:30+00:00): hello Juri Fischer!
welcome to openstreetmap. I see that you have made same changes att hjorten. I think i have also visited this place for a couple of weeks ago. If i remeber right the call the place "hjortenbadet" and their was a building that has "changing rooms". Is that right? And it is a bathing-place?

Its no fault. I just want to complete the information.
Skinfaxi (2018-08-05 10:33:37+00:00): i changed "highway=rest_area" to amenety=bathing_place. I think it is not a typical restarea.
Juri Fischer (2018-08-05 14:20:26+00:00): Hej
That is right, I remember the changing rooms/house. And it is a bathing place/badplats rather than just a rest area. 
Thanks for the change!
Yotsen (2024-02-06 00:12:33+00:00): very funny Connor McConnerson
mavl (2018-07-23 07:54:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
ma-rt-in (2018-07-12 08:38:02+00:00): Hallo,
gut das einer mal die Funßgängerzone überarbeitet. Jedoch sind mir ein paar ungereimheiten aufgefallen. 
Node:1455182269: Warum ist shop=clothes und zugleich disused:shop=clothes?

Oder Node: 1455182271: Handy-Shop oder doch eine Apotheke?

Gruß Martin
NTGhost (2018-07-12 14:54:47+00:00): ich hab erstmal grob angefangen um festzustellen das gar nix stimmt und erstmal wieder aufgehört. Heute ein paar notizen eingefügt als gedächtnisstütze. Die Noitzen die hier in nächster Zeit auftauchen werden meisten von mir sein und sollen mir als Hilfe dienen um die Reihenfolge richtig zu behalten.
NTGhost (2018-07-12 14:56:11+00:00): Anmerkung ich bin in dem Gebiet Zusteller seit Jahren und selbst ich hab manche Shop noch nie angelaufen, also selbst ich werde bei inigen dingen noch mal nachsehen müssen.
ma-rt-in (2018-07-12 14:59:59+00:00): ok. alles klar, dann lass ich dir die note´s offen. Bin rund um Harburg sehr aktiv.
NTGhost (2018-07-12 16:01:09+00:00): Jo cool dann hab ich hier ein wenig Hilfe.  Dinge wie die Denkmäler aka Stolpersteine werde ich generell nicht anfassen. da sind andere schon dran und das weit besser als ich. 
Mein Fokus wird erstmal auf Geschäfte und bei den baulichen Sonderfällen die Eingänge sein. Ansonsten sind die Wegeinzeichnungen eigentlich schon fast perfekt.
geri-oc (2018-07-11 18:06:44+00:00): Hier ist building im node im Umriss des Gebäudes - das ist falsch und sollte entfernt werden. Für Fitnessstudio wird leisure=fitness_centre verwendet. Das andere ist richtig - eventuell ergänzen: addr:suburb=Harburg un  Website, Telefon, Email - https://johnreed.fitness/de/club-hamburg-harburg/

Eventuell sollten die anderen Geschäfte ähnlich aufgebaut werden. Günstig ist auch, wenn es mehrer Eingänge in dem Gebäude gibt, den betreffenden Eingang zu nutzen entrance=main.
NTGhost (2018-07-11 18:11:04+00:00): Die gesamte Struktur der Datensätze ist mir teilweise nicht ganz klar. 
Viele der Läden haben separate Eingänge und  Besonderheiten von denen ich nicht weiß wie man sie korrekt eintragen soll. Ich will erstmal "grob" das Gebiet von Fehleinträgen säubern
mueschel (2018-07-12 09:29:16+00:00): Hi,
I found the key "indoormark:" 123 times in these edits - note the ':' in the key. I guess you wanted to use "indoormark" without the ':'. Could you have a look and fix this?

Cheers, Jan
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-07-21 14:13:03+00:00): Essa via não é primária.
mavl (2018-07-23 07:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
mavl (2018-07-23 07:55:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
naoliv (2018-09-30 00:54:00+00:00): Aqui deu um access muito doido também https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128743510/history
Fidelis Assis (2018-10-06 12:19:14+00:00): Já tinha notado isso em outras edições que fiz com o iD. Parece que algum lixo da área de transferência acaba aparecendo sem um motivo aparente em campos aleatórios. Não sei porque acontece. Obrigado pelo alerta.
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-11 20:28:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60627564 where the changeset comment is: Revert of Pokémon Go vandalism by Matthias Nikolaus
mavl (2018-07-23 07:54:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
pbnoxious (2019-08-11 20:28:27+00:00): Hi, you did move both roads from layer -1 (lower than the river and the crossing ways) to layer +1, which would imply the tunnels are above. Are you sure about this? From my memory there is no "overground" part of the Arlberg Straßentunnel.
Martin Borsje (2019-08-12 17:57:27+00:00): I will check, but note that a small piece of the way S16 is not a tunnel there and crosses the Rosanna at level +1, but again: I will check
Martin Borsje (2019-08-12 18:02:55+00:00): I checked imho it is ok (also refer to aerial photo's: the tunnel (and emergency tunnel) is tagged tunnel=yes, layer=-1
Where the road crosses the river Rosanne it is a (covered) bridge and as the river is at layer 0 (default), the bridge is at layer=1
If I see this wrongly, please comment
pbnoxious (2019-08-13 08:55:23+00:00): I should have checked the aerial imagery before commenting, it seems my memory is wrong. Sorry for bothering you, thanks for checking anyways!
Martin Borsje (2019-08-13 09:15:40+00:00): Trust is okay; checking is better! :)
No harm done!
viloan (2018-07-11 19:21:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-11 20:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60627564 where the changeset comment is: Revert of Pokémon Go vandalism by Matthias Nikolaus