piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2018-11-20 23:00:59+00:00): Здравствуйте, як ви вже помітили, робоча група даних OSM нещодавно випустила нову резолюцію щодо Криму https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2018-11-14_Crimea. Причина цієї зміни викладена на цьому посиланні. Політика ОСМ щодо оскаржуваних територій полягає в тому, щоб представляти ситуацію на місці (тобто, хто контролює певну область). Політика OSMF щодо суперечливих територій https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf прямо говорить: "наявність назви, межі місцезнаходження або опису в базі даних OpenStreetMap НЕ означає, що це є юридично правильним у будь-якій юрисдикції ". Ми не приймаємо рішення щодо того, яка сторона має контролювати певну територію, лише яка сторона наразі має контроль.

Якщо ви вважаєте, що ця політика повинна змінити, вас заохочують обговорювати це з іншою спільнотою - обговорюються переходи до списку розсилки бесіди https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/ і в ряді інших форумів на даний момент.

На додаток до меж "лінії контролю" в OSM, ви можете використовувати дані OSM разом з іншими даними, щоб відобразити межі, які ви хочете показати (у наведеному вище PDF-документі зазначається, що "наша структура бази даних дозволяє картувальникам легко ігнорувати це встановіть і заміните іншу, більш відповідну вашим потребам ").

Якщо вам потрібна допомога в тому, як досягти будь-якого з переліченого вище, або будь-які інші питання, будь ласка, зв'яжіться з Робочою групою з питань даних на dwg@osmfoundation.org. Я особисто написав щоденник, в якому пояснюється, як обробити і показати певну обрану мову або вибір мов; Я можу думати про інших, що показують, як замінити кордони ОСМ іншим набором, якщо це потрібно.

Проте, будь-ласка, не просто змініть тут межі, щоб вони не збігалися з ситуацією на місці без будь-яких консультацій. Такі зміни будуть відновлені, і маппери, що виконують ці зміни, можуть не мати можливості редагувати OpenStreetMap.

З повагою,

Енді Таунсенд, від імені Робочої групи з інформаційних технологій OSM
aceman444 (2018-12-02 01:44:04+00:00): Another completely wrong changeset.
You claim to use "Bing aerial imagery", but you can't see the classification of a road from aerial imagery. So why do you touch the road type and create fictional higher level roads?
Most primary/secondary/tertiary roads in Slovakia have a 'ref' tag with a number. You did not add this one so it is clear you just made the roads up.

Reverting.
mds878 (2018-11-23 01:10:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/646883803
が不自然な線路に見えます。確認いただけないでしょうか。
aceman444 (2018-12-02 02:25:47+00:00): More experiments? Good that you put the trunk back to primary.
Warin61 (2018-11-21 07:18:57+00:00): Hi,
The relation 9020297 has no informative tags (in other words - what is it???). It serves no purpose. And the outer way is not closed. 
The relation 9022560 also has no informative tags. And it only has one member. 

The pools are not being rendered - because they are coved by your concrete paths. 

I have simplified this to one relation only! 

What I would do:
Edit the one relation for the concrete paths .. using one outer way. Then in the relation include each pool as an inner. 

Use the remaining relation 9031583 as an example to follow - needs to be expanded to include the other pools and walk ways. 

Do not us the tag area=yes. Not needed and confuses things. 

The name tag is for the name only, use the description tag for a description. 

Hope you can follow that.
Alecs01 (2018-11-25 13:34:18+00:00): Il municipio lo hai cancellato in realtà ... ora l'ho ripristinato.
eggie (2018-12-05 18:27:26+00:00): Dag Cornelis.. Zou je svp commentaar bij upload kunnen zetten wat je edits precies inhouden. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-05 18:29:24+00:00): .. ook beter niet schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus. Dit levert heel vaak schade op door onbedoelde verschuivingen. Dat komt omdat je edit met de linkermuis, maar ook schuift.
Het gebied van je edits is dus veel te groot.
Groet,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-20 17:24:49+00:00): Dag Hans.. Allemaal nuttige aanvullingen.

Op een bollard horen geen accesstags op.
 Nooit met access=no beginnen. 
Het is allemaal default behalve dan dat paard en evt. moped als dat door de router als motor_vehicle wordt gezien.
Haal je de accesstags eraf. 
Zie ook wiki voor bollard.
gormo (2018-11-20 15:17:56+00:00): Falscher CS-Kommentar; richtiger wäre "Wülfingen, Über dem Kampe: Häuser etc. nach Luftbild".
rab (2018-11-20 15:52:30+00:00): At the moment ESRI Imagery are more recent then bing in most parts of Harare . It is obviously a planned street layout here. So I would assume that this little connections are temporary shortcuts or leftover tracks. Once the development of this area is finished they will disappear. Maybe they are already gone.
Chris Grundy (2018-11-20 22:58:50+00:00): Thanks Rab.  I will make sure we use Esri images when we start mapping the area properly.  We have a local team that will be going and doing ground checks as well.
eggie (2018-11-20 17:44:24+00:00): Dag Hans .. Adressen zetten we niet op de "shape" van het gebouw. Dat bevindt zich al op de adresnode van de BAG  (Kadaster).
Graag het adres verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-20 19:29:20+00:00): Duplikaat adres van gebouw gehaald en bollards aangepast. Ziet er verder goed uit. Import zuidelijk gebouw zou nog "moeten".
eggie (2018-11-20 17:47:00+00:00): Het gebied van je edit is zo groot geworden (Wanneer het er zo uit ziet zou er een belletje moeten rinkelen) omdat je de parking aan de landuse-residential hebt geplakt.
Wanneer iemand gaat schuiven komt alles wat daar nog meen geplakt is mee en krijg je ongewenste effecten. Ik zal het losmaken.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-20 17:47:17+00:00): Je edit.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64702787
KrzysztZ (2021-11-20 17:12:06+00:00): Według jakich danych została naniesiona droga pożarowa 28? Wg mapy przekazanej mi w listopadzie 2021 przez Nadleśnictwo Mielec przebiega gdzie indziej.
eggie (2018-11-20 19:19:57+00:00): Beste Lurch_j   Probeer svp je edits te beschrijven. Verbetering is een beetje vaag voor andere mappers.
Ook svp niet met de kaart schuiven in de editmodus. Dit levert vaak schade op. 
MVG,
Eggie
Lurch_J (2018-11-20 22:20:10+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Sorry, wat heb ik dan veranderd met schuiven? Ben ook geen expert, hoe kan ik dan beter scrollen over de map?
Het enige wat ik gedaan heb is aangegeven dat de wegen van asfalt zijn. Zal voortaan duidelijker zijn.
gr. Lurch_J
eggie (2018-11-21 07:00:04+00:00): Dag Lurch.. Je hebt hier niets verschoven http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64702967

maar we zien dat vaak. wel.
Het komt dan omdat je edit met links, maar ook schuift.
Bij editor JOSM zien we dat niet (aanrader) , want dan schuif je met rechts. 
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Bedankt voor je reactie,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-21 07:05:33+00:00): .. en hoe beter scrollen..  eerst opslaan.. uit de editmodus en dan naar de nieuwe locatie.
Baloo Uriza (2023-08-24 22:36:06+00:00): These could use a bit more work on the shape.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/64703221
manings (2018-12-10 11:28:22+00:00): This edit contain graffiti and  has been deleted in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65340474
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64704189
manings (2018-12-10 11:28:06+00:00): This edit contain graffiti and  has been deleted in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65340474
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64704484
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
manings (2018-12-10 11:27:58+00:00): This edit contain graffiti and  has been deleted in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65340474
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64704959
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-11-20 16:27:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
maraf24 (2018-11-20 19:30:07+00:00): Proszę podać źródła uzasadniające te zmiany.
maraf24 (2019-04-11 12:28:02+00:00): Skasowanie prawidłowego sklepu to nie jest poprawka.
abrensch (2018-11-25 19:34:33+00:00): habe Deinen Vandalismus revertiert (OSM ist kein Malbuch!!)
dgregori (2018-11-28 08:44:09+00:00): Danke fürs Steine in den Weg legen, du Pflaume.
mariotomo (2021-03-03 14:52:55+00:00): hola.  sería interesante entrar en contacto con vuestro grupo.  les anoto una mejora: la "Iglesia Unión de Balboa" no es "Roman Catholic" sino ofrece espacio a todas denominaciones.  la he anotado como "syncretic", pero tendré que revisar el valor más apropiado.
Matthew Darwin (2018-11-21 23:43:25+00:00): Hi Danny.  You added a new 1650 Comstock Rd.  There was already one there in a different location, and there is also an interpolation that doesn't match.  Just checking if we should remove the interpolation and the old address point?
DannyMcD (2018-11-22 23:53:35+00:00): I have removed the old interpolation and point.  It looks like it was based on the addresses before the WESCO building was built.
eggie (2018-11-20 19:12:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-11-20 19:16:49+00:00): Alle info heb ik naar de originele adresnode verplaatst. Er stonden nu drie identieke adressen. 
MVG,
Eggie
DaanTom (2018-11-20 23:09:23+00:00): dankjewel! Sorry voor mijn fout met de identieke adressen. Ik zal hier rekening mee houden.

Met Vriendelijke Groeten,
Daan
eggie (2018-11-21 07:28:45+00:00): Oke Daan.. Er wordt je overigens niets kwalijk genomen. Edits worden in het begin gevolgd.. juist ook om te helpen. De stichting was hier zelfs al gemapt, maar verkeerd zodat de naam niet renderde, Nu is het goed. 
Tip: Kijk ook maar een keer met een reguliere editor als potlatch2, iD of aanrader Josm. Dan wordt het duidelijker hoe te mappen. 
MVG,
Eggie
abrensch (2018-11-25 20:56:44+00:00): Hallo rainerU,

kannst Du mal diese Note anschauen wegen inkonstistenten Einbahnstrassen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1600346

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
rainerU (2018-11-26 06:22:01+00:00): Ok, wurde auch von Osmose angemeckert.
viloan (2018-11-20 17:59:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-11-20 18:00:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Refl_ex (2019-01-06 13:51:40+00:00): Некоторые здания не пропущены, они давно снесены.
Refl_ex (2019-01-06 13:56:14+00:00): It isn't missing buildings. They was demolished.
berms (2019-01-07 19:35:00+00:00): Hi reflexz. Thank you for the message. I have removed the buildings using newer imagery from Esri.
Refl_ex (2019-01-08 06:23:05+00:00): DigitalGlobe is so old. Thank you.
DaveF (2018-11-28 14:34:33+00:00): Hi
Can I check what a negative height refers to?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22925660#map=17/55.85828/-4.25673

Cheers
DaveF
TonyS999 (2018-11-28 17:37:38+00:00): I don't know  what has happened here. Changes have appeared which I did not intend to make  including height and roof shapes.
I have deleted tags which are incorrect and created by me  using a new changeset.
Thanks for noticing and sorry for this error.
Regards
Tony
DaveF (2018-11-29 11:49:13+00:00): Thanks
mavl (2018-12-25 00:26:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
amoore6 (2018-11-20 18:59:23+00:00): source = digital globe premium imagery
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:33:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:32:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:32:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-11-20 19:12:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
abakus_uploader (2018-11-20 23:30:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
streckenkundler (2018-11-20 20:11:58+00:00): Hei, bei deinem Changeset brauche ich mal dringen deine Hilfe. Dazu habe  ich habe nur interessehalber ein Frage zu einem Objekt, das in diesen Changeset angelegt worden ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9027270/history#map=16/51.8502/14.2266
Hast du das bewusst als Relation angelegt? 

Wir haben nämlich im Forum eine Disskussion https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64439 über die Anwendung von Multipolygonrelationen wie hier, deren Notwendigkeit, ect... Da kam u.a. die Aussage auf, daß iD sowas manchmal selbstständig macht, ohne Wissen des Nutzers... in dem Fall hier  wäre die Anwendung eines MP's absolut nicht nötig... Ich selbst kenn iD überhaupt nicht  ind kann  mir über dessen Verhaltensweisen kein Urteil erlauben.

Danke für die Hilfe...

Sven
streckenkundler (2018-11-20 20:53:12+00:00): Ergänzung: meine starke Vermutung ist hier, daß iD das hier sebstständig und ohne dein Wissen gemacht hat. Über eine Aussage und Antwort deinerseits würde ich mich sehr freuen!

Grüße, Sven
!MRGBoss (2018-11-20 21:09:50+00:00): Meines Wissens nach habe ich die Wiese ohne ein Multipolygon angelegt. Allerdings kann es mit aus Versehen untergerutscht sein, weshalb ich mich entschuldige, falls dort etwas schief gelaufen ist. LG
streckenkundler (2018-11-20 21:24:26+00:00): Hei,

vielen Dank... das scheint meine Vermutung zu bestätigen, daß du keinen Fehler gemacht hast, sondern der Fehler bei iD zu suchen ist. Bitte verändere das genannte Objekt in nächster Zeit nicht...
Ich melde mich, wenn ich was neues weiß.

Danke und Grüße,

Sven
streckenkundler (2018-11-21 17:41:34+00:00): Hei,

Es hat sich meiner Ansicht nach bestätigt, daß das Entstehen dieses Multipolygon auf eine Uneigenheit (besser Fehler) von iD zurückzuführen ist und nicht auf einen Bedienfehler des Anwenders (was mich auch gewundert hätte). Der User 
"AB-inf-x-chg-AB" hat das Verhalten nachgestellt, analysiert und ins Forum geschrieben. Wenn du dir es durchlesen willst: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=726609#p726609

iD ist übrigens bekannt, gelegentlich Probleme zu bereiten. Mach dir da aber keinen Kopf... Wenn du tiefer einsteigen möchtest, kannst du dir auch mal JOSM  anschauen... 

Ansonsten fröhliches weitermappen... und wenn du Fragen hast... du weist ja, keine Scheu... :)

Viele Grüße,

Sven

PS: ich werde den Fehler nun beseitigen...
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Omnific (2018-11-20 22:15:58+00:00): Guess there were some maps.me updates that took a while to go through.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:47:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].