piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maus (snekin) (2018-12-03 23:27:33+00:00): not. some of the information was received from people who visited and ride this miniature railway. the main part is the analysis of orthophotogrammetry from open sources. еру екфслздфт has never been published anywhere and also is not available to visitors.i think more to contact the owners for the possibility of clarification, in particular the eastern section which passes under the trees, yard and branch to the south.
maus (snekin) (2018-12-03 23:28:22+00:00): *track plan has never been
will_p (2018-12-04 14:51:25+00:00): This appears to be a mechanical edit. Was it discussed anywhere?
DaveF (2018-12-04 14:58:36+00:00): Yes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fhrs:rating
will_p (2018-12-04 15:42:28+00:00): I can't see any discussion in the link you have provided that justifies this edit. Back in 2016 there was some discussion and agreement that the fhrs:rating tag should not be used. However, there was no discussion over whether that tag should be summarily removed by mechanical edit in future. Additionally you have removed other fhrs:* tags, some of which are not transient, such as fhrs:local_authority_id.

Even when there are good reasons for a mechanical edit, advance notice and discussion is still important, so the mappers using those tags understand what is happening. The fact is some mappers have continued to use the fhrs:rating tag. They should have been informed of the deletion in advance and have been given a chance to respond. As it is, they may not understand how or why the tags have disappeared and so may now carry on adding them.
DaveF (2018-12-04 15:57:52+00:00): "it was decided that transient data such as this should not be included as tags"

"we agreed to not put transient data from the fhrs dataset into OSM"

Al* data relevant to fhrs can be obtained via the fhrs:id link.  

There is no sell by date on decisions taken to improve the database's quality.

The maintenance of these tags in OSM can best be described as 'poor'. By law local authorities have to maintain FHRS data. There is no point in OSM doing it as well. 

The majority of tags were at least 6 years old. I suspect that not only are the tags poor data, but many of the establishments are closed.

I believe these edits improve the quality of the OSM database.
will_p (2018-12-04 16:17:43+00:00): There was no discussion at all about a mechanical edit. There are lots of tags in the OSM database that are discouraged to varying degrees, but to remove or change them en masse still requires you to follow the procedure for mechanical edits. Also you didn't address my point about your removal of other fhrs:* tags.

For the record I don't support adding fhrs:rating at all, but that's not the point. The number of undiscussed mechanical edits seems to have increased recently and I think it needs to be challenged. In my view uncontrolled mass edits are a far greater threat to OSM data quality than a small amount of transitory data.
DaveF (2018-12-04 16:21:10+00:00): I refute your claim it was undiscussed & uncontrolled.
DaveF (2018-12-04 17:58:41+00:00): 
Re: "you didn't address my point about your removal of other fhrs:* tags.":-
Please see the changeset comments + "All data relevant to fhrs can be obtained via the fhrs:id link."

Re:fhrs:local_authority_id.
This is a tag is for internal authority use. It is not used by any websites such as 'scores on the doors'. frhs:id is the only tag required.

Please provide evidence removed data was current, beneficial, relevant, in use, being maintained & unavailable from other, better maintained sources & I'll be willing willing to revert. Otherwise I just see these tags as irrelevant gumpf from a database dump which fails to add quality to the OSM database.
DaveF (2018-12-04 18:31:06+00:00): Very disappointing you've reverted without providing justifiable reasons.
will_p2 (2018-12-04 18:48:48+00:00): This reason is clear - it was an discussed mechanical edit. The two-year-old discussion did not support the mass deletion of tags. That discussion also did not lead to any consensus over tags such as fhrs:local_authority_id.
DaveF (2018-12-04 19:28:49+00:00): Your OSM time would be much more beneficially spent if you assessed your criticisms on the actual detrimental quality of the edits rather than just on their size & how you perceive they were performed.
Polarbear (2019-01-23 14:31:38+00:00): DaveF, you are known in the community to have a strong personal opinion. We respect that, but please also respect the OSM is a community work that needs some rules. 
An important rule is documented here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
Your edit is a typical example of a mechanical edit going wrong, since it removed tags that were not disputed.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2018-12-08 07:18:48+00:00): #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis

For the record: the mistake that this edit fixes could be traced back to changeset 62964775 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62964775> - an armchair edit by GlobalLogic/Grab.
SekeRob (2021-02-19 13:32:17+00:00): Hi,

If you want your centre to exist in a relation, you need to add more BioZona locations. If you tell me where they are I see what I can do to connect them or you can do so yourself, but QA now flags this as "1 member relation'.

ciao
viloan (2018-12-03 17:09:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-12-03 17:21:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-03 19:44:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
skorasaurus (2019-01-04 22:28:41+00:00): hi, 

thanks for editing, but in this changeset, you had removed tags from several ways that I had already added (and personally have visited these places). These tags provided extra detail. 

For example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565521261
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565521253
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547700139
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/565521248

As far as I understand, my tags weren't incorrect; please share if they were. 

Regards,
will
freebeer (2019-01-05 17:35:20+00:00): in the two i checked above, i would not have tagged them as osm driveways, which i understand to lead to a private residence (my interpretation may be wrong) and not to provide public the access to a carpark.

this may be an american grammar use of the term though
abhap (2019-07-02 12:28:01+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. Driveways should be added for private residential entities. And for the commercial entities with parking slots it should be a service as per the OSM wiki. 

Please do suggest if there are any other changes related to highway tags.

Regards,
abhap
literan (2018-12-04 12:52:41+00:00): Добрый день. Скажите, а почему вы (и вся ваша большая команда, которая, насколько я вижу, работает над переходами в Москве) не делает основного - тега highway=crossing на общую точку пешеходной дорожки и автодороги?
literan (2018-12-04 20:47:48+00:00): bad, sloppy edit. Fixed
eggie (2018-12-03 19:59:11+00:00): Je kunt als er al gebouwd wordt de nieuwe woningen laten importeren door het BAG team van OSM. Dat kan in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. Inlog identiek aan OSM account met enige vertraging door accountcheck.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Niks mis met je edits verder. construction=house is wat ongebruikelijk. Dat zou ik weghalen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-04 09:02:41+00:00): aangevraagd.. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=728530#p728530
eggie (2018-12-03 19:45:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
_han (2018-12-03 19:48:20+00:00): Dankjewel!
Frans S (2018-12-08 15:06:17+00:00): Hallo Machiel.  Bij het nakijken van deze taak zag ik dat je amper gebouwen vierkant maakt met de S key.  Kun je de volgende keer hier aandacht aan besteden? Verder prima werk. Bedankt voor en blijf mappen. 
groeten
user_5173844 (2018-12-04 15:08:12+00:00): Hi devonshire,

Any tips for adding postcodes from code-point open faster? I thought I am pretty efficient but this is a different league.

Best regards,
ndrw6
devonshire (2018-12-04 20:02:45+00:00): Hi,

Probably looks a lot more than it is. I had a long period after the OSM licence change when I mapped mostly offline and didn't upload my changes so a lot of my recent edits are just catching up with uploading that stuff.
Carnildo (2018-12-03 21:41:59+00:00): All but the oldest imagery shows this as being used for RV storage.  When it comes to mapping land use, "who owns it" doesn't matter as much as "what it's used for".
Frans S (2018-12-08 15:44:27+00:00): Dag Teun.  Tijdens het controleren van jullie werk zag ik dat je vrijwel geen gebouwen vierkant gemaakt hebt met de S key. Graag de volgende keer aandacht aan besteden.
Bedankt voor het mappen en tot de volgende keer
vr groeten
Frans S (2018-12-09 11:56:34+00:00): Hallo Ilse. Bedankt voor je medewerking aan dit project. Even een opmerking.  Je hebt veel gebouwen gemapt. helaas heb je ze niet vierkant gemaakt met de S key. Uit de hand is het vrijwel onmogelijk een goede rechthoek te tekenen.  Dus vandaar de S key. Graag de volgende keer hier aandacht aan besteden. Bedankt en blijf mappen voor het goede doel
Емельянов Александр (2019-01-08 19:13:42+00:00): СНТ Кедр скорректирован 09.01.2019 (207 домов, 10 улиц)
awesm (2019-01-23 06:41:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66557476 where the changeset comment is: revert pointless/careless edits based on imagery around Lyttelton, New Zealand
Aparajita pr (2019-01-24 08:38:29+00:00): Apologies for the inconvenience caused due to my action and looking forward to your suggestion/feedback in future as well. I'll pay closer attention to these things. 

Regards,
Aparajita pr
Constable (2019-07-17 06:22:56+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che tempo fa hai aggiunto questo parcheggio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652055523 , occhio però perché ora risulta sovrapposto a quest'altro, che era già sulla mappa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370490005

il più piccolo dei due andrebbe rimosso, e nel caso il nome spostato sul parcheggio già mappato.
Concordi?
grazie
eggie (2018-12-03 20:02:10+00:00): Denk dat area=yes met naam niet veel zal doen. 
Meestal gebruik ik die marina tag voor een WSV
eggie (2018-12-03 20:21:40+00:00): Die wsv kan dus gewoon op een node (Bv de adresnode)
viloan (2018-12-03 18:55:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jarek 🚲 (2018-12-04 14:04:12+00:00): Thank you for sorting out the paths in this area. Much appreciated :)
Frans S (2018-12-09 09:40:56+00:00): Hallo Aendura, Bedankt voor meewerken aan dit project. Ik (met nog veel anderen) valideren de gemapte taken. Ik zie dat je best veel gebouwen gemapt heb. Alleen, het merendeel heb je niet vierkant gemaakt met de S toets in ID editor, De meeste gebouwen zijn rechthoekig en horen ook zo eruit te zien in het resultaat (kwaliteits punt) Graag de volgende keer aandacht aan besteden. 
Groeten en blijf mappen. Het is voor een goed doel
Andre68 (2018-12-03 19:26:11+00:00): Hi Sophia! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Let me give you two little hint editing coastlines:
1. Try to refine existing coastlines and split the up if needed. This way, it is more likely, that relations will stay intact and coastline is not inconsistent.
2. Land is on left hand side! Always!

Please continue your work and learn! I'll now add your ways to the relations and split the existing one, so you can see, how it works...
Marc_ch (2018-12-05 00:08:48+00:00): Hello,
it look like you didn't read my previous comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65006453
so this one is in english, hope it help :)
about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19367055
before changing primary road to secondary/tertiary, take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features
Primary roads are listed in section A. ref 13 is in section A
it's also unneeded/wrong to add fake/unsigned access restriction like "foot=no" for a trunk. access tag are only for traffic sign related restriction, not to duplicate the law in all way
Regards,
Marc
osmviborg (2018-12-03 19:28:56+00:00): Se her: https://nordjyske.dk/nyheder/nordjylland/i-nattens-mulm-og-moerke-her-er-farten-paa-e45-skiltet-ned-til-120/30d0b825-855d-4ac6-b908-e7a119407d3a
atcomapper (2018-12-03 20:28:21+00:00): Ja der er flere kilder, men grundet ophavsret må vi jo vente på at nogle tager ud og konstaterer "med egne øjne" at det er korrekt.
Frans S (2018-12-09 14:50:33+00:00): Hallo Machiel. Bedankt voor het mappen in dit project. Een opmerking. Het merendeel de gebouwen die je gemapt hebt heb je niet vierkant gemaakt met de S key in ID. Graag de volgende keer aandacht aan besteden. Bedankt
Pieter Vander Vennet (2019-01-06 22:19:38+00:00): Hello TMeco Episa,

I don't see a lot of traces on Strava for the CIME route. Is this possibly a freeride or a very new route?

Bonjour,

Je ne vois pas beaucoup de tracks on la route CIME par la on Strava. Est-ce que c'est un route nouvelle ou un freeride?
ForstEK (2019-12-26 12:13:43+00:00): Здравствуйте, Sowa1980, объясните, пожалуйста, почему Вы удалили линии 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315778302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315778301
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315776848
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315776847
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315776846
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315776845
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258932530
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258932523, созданные пользователем keder и нарисовали поверх них тоже самое?
eggie (2018-12-03 20:04:49+00:00): Oke. goed bezig... ,maar plak nooit landuse= grass in dit geval aan een pad of weg. Niets aan wegen of gebouwen plakken. 
Verder heb je door schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus nr 28 verplaatst naar nr 40. I da Costastr.
Dit waren je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65136480
eggie (2018-12-04 08:19:34+00:00): landuse losgemaakt, adresnode 28 hersteld Joost van de Vondelstraat  weer routeerbaar gemaakt. Twee losse stukken.
ma-rt-in (2018-12-03 20:56:22+00:00): Hallo Thomas,

könntest du in deinen ganzen Anpassungen der Geschäfte auch die Regelung für allgemeine Feiertage eintragen.
lg
Alan (2018-12-03 22:41:01+00:00): 👍
Frans S (2018-12-09 14:52:22+00:00): Hallo Teun, Bedankt voor het mappen in dit project. Even een opmerking.  Het merendeel van de gebouwen heb je niet vierkant gemaakt met de S key.  Graag aandacht aan besteden bij de volgende keer. Bedankt en vriendelijke groeten
eggie (2018-12-03 20:06:44+00:00): Oke.. , maar schuiven met de kaart levert vaak schade op met editor iD. Je schuift met de linkermuis, maar dat is ook je editmuis! Dus niet doen. Uit de editmodus en dan pas naar een andere locatie!
viloan (2018-12-03 19:50:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-12-03 20:07:49+00:00): Hier is dus grote schade door dat schuiven!
eggie (2018-12-03 20:07:56+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65137565
eggie (2018-12-03 20:09:44+00:00): construction= yes moet er ook af. 
Maar ik draai deze changeset terug wegen schade bij Hoogvliet.
eggie (2018-12-03 20:16:38+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #65138171
eggie (2018-12-03 20:18:58+00:00): Je kunt als je toch wilt doorzetten beter overstappen naar Editor JOSM. Dan maak je dit soort "fouten" niet.
Bovendien heb je dan een ingebouwde foutenanalyse en beter achtergronden dat je wel die wegen ziet lopen.
editor josm stap voor stap:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2018-12-03 20:43:59+00:00): Bij Burger King heb ik wat aangepast.
eserte (2019-01-06 14:07:51+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1633805
eserte (2019-02-20 21:06:15+00:00): Östlich der Greifenhagener Straße ist noch nicht asphaltiert.
eggie (2018-12-03 20:13:59+00:00): Kruithuis lijkt me met een t en aan elkaar.
Kijk je nog even?
eggie (2018-12-04 08:48:16+00:00): Spelling aangepast. Kunstatelier toegevoegd.
eggie (2018-12-03 20:24:12+00:00): Oke.., Twee hondjes is hier niet meer? Maar ik zie nu wel twee biblotheken.
stevea (2019-01-23 03:12:16+00:00): Hi Clay.  I think OSM's data can express what I believe you're doing here with simple tags rather than Relation: 7453451.  I think what you want to do is tag all elements in that relation with owner=UP;operator=BNSF and you're done.  Relation: 7453451 can then be deleted.

Steve
clay_c (2019-01-24 00:58:50+00:00): Looks like you're right. I wasn't the one who originally added that relation, but I'll be sure to clean this one up and others like it as I go along. Thanks!
stevea (2019-01-24 01:15:36+00:00): You're welcome, thanks and a polite wave in your direction.
InsertUser (2018-12-04 21:53:02+00:00): IIRC traffic on the circle must yield to inbound traffic at nodes 289189608 & 289189063 (probably node 289189616 too). I have modified to junction=circular.
mumblin (2018-12-05 18:11:21+00:00): Thank you
newpavlov (2018-12-09 08:24:29+00:00): Откатил ваше переименование, топоним Chonhar Strait в английском не применяется. (см. гугл) Плюс замечу, что некрасиво удалять точку и пересоздавать её.
user_6110846 (2018-12-09 08:54:43+00:00): создаем два обьекта для разніх сообществ
вы пишите совдеповский Chongar

я в украинском пишу украиснкий современный Chonhar 

Напишите как будуть два обьекта 
как полигоны по границе 
или две точки 

Русское сообщество нет никаких оснований и вообще прав и в будущем не будет как переводить название созданные от украиснкаго города Чонгар 
Вы город Чонгар не кониролируете поетому Chonhar ет о правильная название 


Украинксое сообщество имеет все права и ето есть константа етот пролив называат украиснким переводом на основе правила он грунд 

Жду слово точка или полигон
user_6110846 (2018-12-09 08:56:22+00:00): или в каждом теге содаем два перевода также как и тег нейм
newpavlov (2018-12-09 09:00:22+00:00): Ваши хотелки абсолютно неважны, важно как обозначается данный топоним в тех или иных языках, и "вы" никаких прав на то какие топонимы используются в других языках абсолютно никакого права не имеете. Обратить внимание, я Чонгарский п-ов не трогую осознанно, т.к. для него более чем хватает использования Chonhar в авторитетных источниках, чего мягко говоря нет для пролива и моста.

Если вас мои аргументы не устраивают, может уладить этот спор с помощью DWG. Опять.
newpavlov (2018-12-09 09:01:30+00:00): BTW: для тега name я использовал оба названия: и украинское, и российское. Создавать дубликаты ради "правильной транслитерации" мягко говоря глупо.
user_6110846 (2018-12-09 09:36:13+00:00): С вашего форума 
В границы Крыма я лезть вообще не буду возможно обьекты только по линии границы и то постоянно себя отговариваю потому что собачиться с русским сообщество морально истаскивает А к украинизации Донбасса русское сообщество никакого отношения не имеет - ибо то парафия украиснкого сообщества . В двух местах украиснкая территория картографирована в России но учитывая сложные отношения 10 квадр километров можна исправить и позже

нужно два перевода:

Во вторых  на ето мы имеем правило по принципу он грунд потому в украинской половине перевод Chonhar есть правильным
Вы же знаете что переводы википеди  можна игнорить если они нарушают правило он грунд

Например французская (полностью кроме Бахчисарая )  и часто немецкая 
а  итальянская все (кроме  Керчи ) википедия по Крыму использует только украинское название 
но 
Вы же игнорите их на основ е правила он грунд и поставили в неймы иностанных  русский перевод 

Второе  . 
Когда англичанин приедет в Украину ему будут часто переводить или предлагать литературу где Chonhar 

Когда англичанин приедет в Крым  то россияне будут переводить или давать ему литературу Chongar
Вот почему нужно евро переводы вернуть  и тому подобное 
писать два названия

http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/55-2010-%D0%BF англиский язык создает переводы по етому (кроме гугла и Бинга у них свои правила) 
Для меня ето важно потому что я паралельно работаю у википедиях по тихоньку что те меняли транслитерацию с русского на транслитерацию с украинского в украиснких городах
Например недавно Zaporojye в азербайджанской было исправлено на Zaporojya  благодаря мне
user_6110846 (2018-12-09 09:41:15+00:00): В украиснком сообществе  транслитерация разрешена 
и блокировать CHONHAR  только потому что русское сообщество приняло решение для себя о запрете транслитерации Вы не можете 

Обьекты подобного рода могут быть просто транслдитерированы потому что они находять ся  на территории украиснкого сообщества
Поетому   ваше отправка в ДВГ здесь не в  тему 
М ыукраинцы хотим транлитерировать и мы транслитерируем .
Смотрите на наши поселки улицы  - англиский там создан путем транслитерации