piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2019-01-25 08:21:37+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately in drawing the park you have dragged the school outline out of shape. The single school outline covered the whole area bur are there two or even three separate school areas as well as the park area? If so all the areas should be carefully drawn as the public would only have open access to the park.

It might be best to revert this changeset and start again. I don't have first hand info of the area's but if you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 21:55:35+00:00): excluido
viloan (2019-01-24 21:26:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
wvdp (2019-01-24 21:41:21+00:00): should be number 66506962
dktue (2019-01-28 07:12:30+00:00): Wieso hast Du die Stellplätze des Parkplatzes gelöscht?
ma-rt-in (2019-01-28 10:14:35+00:00): Hallo,
weil das doppelt gemoppelt war, entweder parking_space oder amenity=parking.
canfe (2020-01-27 09:18:51+00:00): Il Pilone di Tetto Rua'
va scritto con l'apostrofo?
o in realtà con l'accento?

Ciao ci vediamo a FOSS4G!
ma-rt-in (2019-01-25 14:16:30+00:00): Hallo,
haben sich beide Haltestellennamen geändert? Wenn ja, dann die andere auch anpassen und die stop_area.
vg
vademecum (2019-01-26 18:53:38+00:00): Was meinst Du? Die anderen drei Nodes waren schon vorher aktualisiert. Nur diese eine stop_position war noch falsch.
ma-rt-in (2019-01-27 15:14:20+00:00): Ok. Das die anderen schon bearbeitet waren ist mir wohl entfallen, jedoch ist die Haltestellenrelation noch nicht bearbeiten worden. Siehe Relation 9090675.
ma-rt-in (2019-01-25 15:06:15+00:00): Hallo,
welche Frage hast du zu deinem fixme genau?
Map-Peter (2019-01-26 01:25:38+00:00): Hallo ma-rt-in, 
weißt du vielleicht ob dieses mittlere Werkgelände von Aurubis einen Eigennamen hat, so wie die anderen beiden, nördlich und südlich gelegenen, Werkgelände ("Aurubis - Zentrale" und "Aurubis - Werk Ost")? 
Gruß Peter
ma-rt-in (2019-01-27 15:37:13+00:00): Ne leider nicht. Ich denke das die Bennenung für sowas an einem landuse sowieso nicht passend ist.
Chris Fleming (2019-02-01 14:25:47+00:00): Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for sorting this out. The edit looks great.

Please let me know if you have any questions.
JJIglesias (2019-01-26 10:09:50+00:00): Saludos y gracias por tu edicion de Los Negros, por favor recordar:
a) Las Calles llevan Calle,Avenida,Pasaje,Pasillo,Anillo, etc delante de su nombre propio; en este caso seria Calle Barrientos.
b) Tenemos muy pocas calles de esa poblacion con nombre en el mapa. Podrias colaborarnos colocando mas nombres q conozcas?
Gracias
JJ
Amonite1025 (2019-01-28 23:35:09+00:00): Muchas gracias por su atención a esta edición en Los Negros, Bolivia. Gracias por sus sugerencias y recordatorios de cómo debemos editar los nombres de calles en Bolivia. Si tengo alguna duda editando una calle, usted estaría dispuesto a contribuir añadiendo qué tipo de calle es si nosotros añadimos un “note" en OSM? 

Sí, he visto que hay pocas calles con nombre en esta área y otras, y seguiré contribuyendo. Quiero ser responsable con las ediciones que hago y poder contribuir con la mejor y correcta data posible. 

Nuevamente, muchas gracias por su mensaje y contribuir con una mejor edición en Bolivia.
JJIglesias (2019-01-29 10:55:58+00:00): Gracias. Con gusto te ayudo; no obstante si agregas una Nota posiblemente ni la vea, pues hay decenas en toda Bolivia que tienen que ser resueltas poco a poco, me lanzas un mensaje mejor y con gusto reviso.
//
Por costumbre reviso las ediciones de los nuevos editores para corregir cualquier defecto inicial por falta de practica, obviamente esto es un proceso de aprendizaje a ratos interminable.
//
Te sugiero q visites http://learnosm.org/es/
Gracias JJ
Amonite1025 (2019-01-29 21:51:43+00:00): Saludos JJ:

Gracias por seguir mejorando el mapa en Bolivia y sus sugerencias.
fx99 (2019-01-25 04:34:49+00:00): This CS went completely wrong: it seems that all members of the relation are duplicate now. I do not know how to fix that the best way. See the discussion in the Germn Forum.
kartonage (2019-01-25 05:57:23+00:00): The duplicated member issue has been resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66621473

Best regards
Jakob48 (2019-01-25 18:50:37+00:00): This error obviously caused vespucci. My JOSM in the next edit (CS 66615812) showed this error yesterday, too. I intended to fix it today.
Thank you very much for your quick reaction.
JJIglesias (2019-01-26 09:35:44+00:00): Saludos.
a) Muchas Gracias por tu edicion. Un solo detalle no se ponen los nombres en Mayusculas sino capitalizados asi que seria: Ferrocentro Comarapa
b) Hay muchas calles de Comarapa que NO tienen nombre; podrias colaborarnos e irles poniendo su nombre?
Gracias
JJ
maraf24 (2019-01-25 09:11:03+00:00): Prosiłem o niezmieniane kategorii dróg na nieprawidłową.
To jest wojna edycyjna z twojej strony i zgłaszam ją do moderatora.
juliaboy (2019-01-25 10:53:11+00:00): Hej, du nævnte, ovre på https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66596482, at du havde et kort som viser opdelingen mellem flyvepladsen og lufthavnen - har du mulighed for at sætte det på som kilde? Lige nu synes jeg ikke at det fremgår at de to deles om landingsbaner, m.m. men når det er sagt, så er det vigtige for mig, at lufthavnen ikke bare er mappet som et punkt :-)
mikkolukas (2019-01-26 13:21:43+00:00): Well, de to parter har et eksemplarisk samarbejde om landingsbaner, luftkontrol (kontroltårnet) og band&redning.

Det er flyvevåbnet som stiller disse dele til rådighed (blandt andet som i: De har brandslukningskøretøjerne og det er dem som står i kontroltårnet).

Selve arealet ejes af Flyvestation Aalborg (eller teknisk set er det forsvarsministeriet, but get my drift) - med undtagelse af området tættest på den civile lufthavnsterminal.

I denne publikation (.pdf-fil), vises området for Flyvestation Aalborg
http://www.ejendomsstyrelsen.dk/Publikationer/Documents/Flyvestation%20%C3%85lborg%20WEB.pdf

-og her er markering af Aalborg lufthavns areal (billedet i venstre side nederst i artiklen)
http://www.aalborgkommuneplan.dk/planredegoerelse/norresundby/r_2-015.aspx
juliaboy (2019-01-28 15:20:26+00:00): Tak:-) Så synes jeg også at det giver mening at arealerne er mappet som de er - selvom det for en civilist må føles lidt urovækkende at flyve med rutefly midt ind i et militært område.
mikkolukas (2019-01-28 16:12:52+00:00): Så længe det er et venligtsindet militært område ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-28 04:47:34+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3282693 ?
Andrea Musuruane (2019-02-14 15:33:05+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, puoi smettere di taggare i place esclusivamente in base alla popolazione? E' una cavolata enorme. Vedi: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-January/041735.html Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2019-02-14 16:58:06+00:00): se parliamo dell’Italia, town sono le città (che non sono city), e village i capoluoghi di comune che non sono città. Facile, utile, con risultati aspettati e congrui (tiene conto della situazione culturale, storica).
Population è il tag per la popolazione.
+1 al revert
dieterdreist (2019-02-14 16:59:10+00:00): also because it is an undiscussed automated import (i.e. violating the guidelines)
dieterdreist (2019-02-14 17:02:52+00:00): poi non si capisce come un’intero place=town possa diventare un landuse=residential per esempio qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116171905/history
fayor (2019-02-14 18:12:49+00:00): Scusate, non mi sono inventato io i place con la popolazione!
fayor (2019-02-14 18:13:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:place
mbranco2 (2019-02-14 18:31:32+00:00): Ciao Fayor, 
puoi venire per favore in ML, così ne possiamo discutere tutti insieme?
Andrea Musuruane (2019-02-14 18:42:56+00:00): Una volta sulla wiki c'era scritto "Il numero di abitanti è solo un valore indicativo: ad esempio l'unica città di una ampia area può essere classificata {{IT:Tag|place|city}} anche se ha 90.000 abitanti.". Poi è arrivato l'utente fayor è il 9 febbraio 2018,  ha tolto questa frase.
fayor (2019-02-14 18:45:54+00:00): L'ho sostituita con quest'altra: 
il numero di abitanti è solo un valore indicativo: in caso di valori di popolazione prossimi alle soglie prevale l'importanza dell'abitato in relazione al contesto geografico.
Andrea Musuruane (2019-02-14 19:09:49+00:00): E' questo è esattamente quello che NON è stato fatto in questo changeset.
fayor (2019-02-14 19:16:53+00:00): A quali città ti riferisci?
dieterdreist (2019-02-14 22:49:00+00:00): è chiaro già dal commento del changeset che si tratta di un edit semiautomatico: “da town a village per i centri con meno di 10mila abitanti”

Gli edit che vanno a modificare sistematicamente i dati, influiscono in maniera sistematico il sistema di mappatura, vanno discussi con gli altri. È una regola formale ma è anche buon senso in un progetto comunitario.

Nel merito della questione place:
Non siamo gli unici in Italia a mettere town per le città, in Germania c’è un titolo simile (Stadt), e penso anche in altri paesi europei.
dieterdreist (2019-02-14 22:54:34+00:00): “il numero di abitanti è solo un valore indicativo: in caso di valori di popolazione prossimi alle soglie ...”
non è la stessa cosa, con “valori prossimi alle soglie” ristringi fortemente le possibilità di classificazione. Invece queste soglie sono soltanto indicative, la cosa importante è l’importanza culturale e funzionale, l’idea delle soglie è maggiormente superata, c’è una correlazione debole. Chiaro che un centro con 200000 abitanti non potrà essere solo un village, ma le città con 6000 abitanti ci sono, come anche i village con 15000.
SomeoneElse (2019-02-16 14:11:07+00:00): @fayor: Please explain where this mechanical edit was discussed with the community first.

@fayor: Si prega di spiegare dove questa modifica meccanica è stata discussa prima con la comunità.
fayor (2019-02-16 14:22:07+00:00): Non si tratta di un mechanical edit, ogni modifica è stata fatta singolarmente e manualmente ed è frutto di ricerca e incrocio di dati.
SomeoneElse (2019-02-16 14:44:55+00:00): @fayor It's clearly a mechanical edit - applying some changes that you think data ought to conform to but ignoring anyone else's views on why things were tagged differently.  if it had been discussed beforehand there wouldn't be a huge thread about it at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2019-February/thread.html#65682 .  OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project - we have to work together to create the best map.  Collaboration is a concept that you have struggled to grasp, as the numerous complaints on mailing lists, http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=743479 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/fayor/blocks demonstrate.  I would suggest that you need to take a step back, perhaps take a break for a couple of days and then perhaps apologise to the Italian OSM community for the way that you have behaved here (and in the past).
SomeoneElse (2019-02-16 14:45:28+00:00): @fayor È chiaramente una modifica meccanica: applica alcune modifiche che ritieni debbano essere conformi ai dati, ignorando le opinioni di altri sul perché le cose sono state taggate in modo diverso. se fosse stato discusso in anticipo, non ci sarebbe stato un grosso problema al riguardo su https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2019-February/thread.html#65682. OpenStreetMap è un progetto collaborativo: dobbiamo collaborare per creare la migliore mappa. La collaborazione è un concetto che tu hai faticato a cogliere, come i numerosi reclami sulle mailing list, http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=743479 e https://www.openstreetmap.org / user / fayor / blocks dimostrano. Ti suggerirei di fare un passo indietro, magari fare una pausa per un paio di giorni e poi magari chiedere scusa alla comunità italiana OSM per il modo in cui ti sei comportato qui (e in passato).
fayor (2019-02-16 14:56:29+00:00): Mi suggeriresti? Sembra più una minaccia ma va bene lo stesso, ero sicuro di questa risposta. Del resto so bene che alcune "opinioni" valgono più di altre perché imposte con la forza, ed è tempo perso cercare di spiegare, come hai ricordato non è certo la prima volta che accade.
vijay kumar reddy b (2019-01-25 00:40:14+00:00): Source DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery
atcomapper (2019-01-25 07:29:04+00:00): Tillader mig at rette tilbage her, da den officielle bredde på banen altså er 22.5 meter (https://aim.naviair.dk/media/files/hym0bygendn/EK_AD_2_EKYT_en.pdf)
mikkolukas (2019-01-26 17:39:30+00:00): Tak. Så må min anden kilde have været unøjagtig :)
Supaplex (2019-01-25 07:43:32+00:00): 可以用JOSM的Conflation Plugin來合併
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Conflation
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66617926
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-25 10:04:51+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM, you mapped one of the trees you added as a park. Please check this page on the OSM wiki for more info on how to map trees. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
SomeoneElse (2019-01-25 20:09:16+00:00): Hello,
This change looks pretty implausible - you've changed a footpath so that it runs through a major road and a railway line without actually joining them.
Any idea what happened?
Best Regards,
Andy
mueschel (2019-01-30 12:05:21+00:00): Hi,
on this node you put 4 man_made tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6235272161
This is unfortunately not how tagging in OSM works. Tags can't be extended with a '_1' suffix in almost all cases, as this will just be ignored by software. Please add individual nodes for each features, even if they are all in the same place.

Jan
rivermont (2019-01-31 18:58:00+00:00): Hi Jan,
I wasn't sure how to tag this as they are all part of the same object and are connected. I've seen both `man_made=tag1;tag2;tag3` and `man_made=tag1 + man_made=tag2 + man_made=tag3`, but haven't found documentation on which method to use. Multiple different nodes on the same point doesn't seem correct though, but I could be wrong.
mueschel (2019-01-31 19:00:34+00:00): Hi,
';' separated values should only be used on minor, descriptive tags. But not on the main physical tags (highway, shop, man_made...)
Having multiple nodes is not perfect, but there is no better solution, that is also understood by e.g. POI maps.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
nevw (2019-01-25 05:53:34+00:00): Reverted seo spam , no addr tags, no primary tags , seems like recent edits like this are simply using osm as a business listing service.
Your comment and descriptionare are just a business promotion (spam)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:45:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:45:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
Jarek 🚲 (2019-02-24 21:15:25+00:00): Hello, is setting amenity=doctors on e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6169558448/history really sensible? This is an eyeglass shop and an optometrist office. It's not really "a place you can go to get medical attention or a check up from a physician"...
thetornado76 (2019-02-25 18:26:13+00:00): Of course.
I had changed some amenity to healthcare. But doctor is wrong. I will fix it.
Jarek 🚲 (2019-02-27 15:55:18+00:00): Cheers, thanks for checking on this.
mavl (2019-02-26 17:00:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Glassman (2019-01-26 22:06:57+00:00): The node is placed in a parking lot. You also need a tag to describe the business. I'm going to remove the node. If you need help, please ask.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66622498
tux67 (2019-01-25 08:09:40+00:00): Hi - with htis change you added a highway_2 Tag instead of a name tag - this is fixed now.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66622667
yaswap (2019-07-11 06:29:23+00:00): Hi,

 Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Its a mistake from my side by changing the tags wrongly. Thanks for reverting the changes.

(yaswap on behalf of karnatim)
mavl (2019-02-26 17:00:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
PT-53 (2019-01-25 12:48:05+00:00): Hallo gmbo,
gem. Wiki soll bei Stolpersteinen in das Merkmal name der Name der Person und nicht "Stolperstein" eingetragen werden.
Wenn es keinen (einzelnen) Namen gibt bleibt name halt leer.
Änderst Du das bitte noch?
Wie kann man eigentlich die Lage von Stolpersteinen anhand von Luftbildern korrekt festlegen?
Fragende Grüße
gmbo (2019-01-25 15:59:52+00:00): Werde den Namen rausnehmen und  Stolperschwelle in description einsetzen.
Luftbild nutze ich hier um den Eingang des Weges zur Lok zu finden, da ich beim Sortieren meiner Bilder auf die Schwelle gestolpert war und keinen passen Trag dazu hatte. Da hilft ein gutes Luftbild schon bei der Positionierung
Commodoortje (2019-01-25 13:51:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Commodoortje (2019-01-25 13:59:06+00:00): Ben je je bewust dat je de bushaltes versleept hebt? Tevens verlijm je de nodes aan de highway, is dit per ongeluk?
Klopt het dat de meest oostelijke bushalte een andere naam heeft dan Estec? Zou het kunnen zijn dat deze halte Space Expo heet?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/734780070
Leo Slager (2019-01-25 22:48:36+00:00): @Commodoortje:
De naamswijzigingen zijn correct.
Ik had hier al wat problemen met de routerelaties, maar die zijn nu allemaal opgelost.
@Daelea:
Bedankt voor deze informatie/wijziging.
Leo Slager (2019-01-25 22:50:02+00:00): De bushalte losgemaakt van de highway.
Alleen de stop_position hoort op de highway. Het platform hoort naast de weg.