piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jmapb (2018-08-14 20:43:39+00:00): I don't think these are being mapped this way because they stop at the curb -- there are clearly visible crosswalks at all of the hanging ends. I don't know whether homeslice60148 prefers to map this way or if it's part of the maproulette instructions (? I don't know how maproulette works. You, Mike, seem to have some experience though!) I messaged homeslice60148 regarding this changeset discussion, so maybe we'll see.
I don't think we're going to be able to come to any agreement on the sidewalks-as-ways issue anytime soon, but I do like the idea of basic guidelines for how the sidewalk ways should be tied into the street grid when they *are* mapped, to avoid routing problems.
jmapb (2018-08-14 20:45:34+00:00): BTW this changset (61631661) has been reverted by changeset 61662763 (restoring the deleted sidewalks), and the loose sidewalk ends have been tied into the street grid by changeset 61662897. This will improve the routing. It will still be a left and two rights to get from 691 Fulton to 239 Ashland Place, for instance, but I think we can all agree that it's an improvement over this:
https://imgur.com/50v4S2R
What I'd suggest as a standard would be this:
https://imgur.com/PZGVrHO
Routing would still have some little wiggles of course, no way to prevent that, but there'd be no real wrong turns or backtracking. (And I'll go ahead and upload this in a bit.)
TheBestIdea (2018-08-14 20:48:42+00:00): I agree that your suggestion would be a big improvement.
jmapb (2018-08-14 21:26:03+00:00): Happy to hear it. And MikeN. by the way, I believe I misread what you meant by "end at the curb" -- yes indeed, the sidewalks themselves do literally end at the curb, crosswalks or no, and I can easily imagine a mapper choosing to map them in this literal fashion without realizing that it affects the routing.
jmapb (2018-08-15 16:58:26+00:00): Well I added my sample "cap" at the Fulton/Ashland place, changeset 61672263. If there's ever a consensus to purge these loose-end sidewalks that survives the edit wars, please feel free to get rid of that too -- it's only useful IMO as a fix to routing problem the loose ends cause.

Homeslice60148 has not responded to my invitation to join this discussion... Other than following homeslice around and patching the loose ends (which I'm not inclined to do) I don't think there's anything to be done about it, and the pedestrian routing will be damaged for the foreseeable.

(If I have too much coffee someday I might bring this up on one of the mailing list, with the aim of improving the Sidewalk_as_separate_way section of the wiki.)

J
homeslice60148 (2018-08-15 19:24:57+00:00): Hi everyone!
homeslice60148 (2018-08-15 19:46:49+00:00): Whoops, let's try this again. Hi, everyone!  I just noticed jmapb's message and I'm jumping into the discussion here to let everyone know what I'm doing and why. I am a very long time mapper on OSM, and it is my general goal to improve the map. I personally follow the "do no harm, delete no correct data" mantra in my mapping.

1. The Maproulette project instructions DO NOT say to add sidewalks. I am doing this as a sort of sister-project that coincides with the official "check intersection" project. My rationale is that, if every intersection in Brooklyn is done, then the crossings may as well be done at every intersection, and then if the crossings are done, than the sidewalks may as well be done, too.

2. I map sidewalks from the intersection of assignment on Maproulette until the next street to street intersection (residential or higher). This way, my methodology of pairing the two tasks stays in tact.

3. Following the logic of OSM standards for separating dual carriageways, sidewalks should be mapped as separate ways. As there is a physical boundary between the road and the sidewalk, they should be mapped separately. This allows individual tagging, for example surfaces. The road may be cobblestone while the sidewalk may be concrete. Cars and (for the most part) bicycles are not allowed on the sidewalk, and pedestrians are not allowed on the road. The land-truth physical separation of sidewalks and roads should be represented on a map where something as small as a fire hydrant can be accurately mapped. 

Yes, the routing will be screwed up for a while, but I am mapping each of these individually, and I can't do all of Brooklyn in one sitting!
jmapb (2018-08-16 16:46:13+00:00): Hi homeslice, thanks for joining us -- I shouldn't have given up so quickly! And thanks for being clear about your goals and MO.
As I said, I've admired your sidewalks. But I hope I've also demonstrated the downside this mapping technique has on the pedestrian routing. 
When sidewalks are fully mapped, of course, the pedestrian routing improves, and, as bhousel mentioned, it creates opportunities for detailed mapping of the sidewalk ways that may assist wheelchair users, etc. In the mean time, though, these islands with loose ends will break pedestrian and wheelchair routing for years to come. There are over 4000 intersections in Brooklyn, and a ballpark estimate is that it would be 6 or 7 years before you're done. Of course, the process may speed up as others chip in! But we're looking at years of broken routing nonetheless.
I'd ask you consider connecting the loose ends to the road network so the presence of the sidewalks does not negatively affect the routing. 
Offhand I feel that capping the loose ends with the four-crosswalk way like I added at Fulton & Ashland is the best way to transition between a sidewalk-mapped block and its sidewalkless neighbors. And if it is in fact your goal to completely map the Brooklyn sidewalks, then it's something you'll want to do eventually anyway,
I'd love to hear other suggestions if you or anyone else has them, though, since I do a fair amount of this myself (connecting paths and sidewalks to the grid) and I want do what's in the best interest of the map.
Thanks again for joining us, J
homeslice60148 (2018-08-17 20:02:32+00:00): J, 
I think the solution of closing the crosswalks for routing will work. I will do this from now on.
jmapb (2018-08-17 21:02:36+00:00): Thanks! (Btw I think I mapped your place today: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1829661485 )
Martin Borsje (2018-08-13 18:59:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Владимир К (2018-08-14 13:26:29+00:00): Добрый день. 
Пожалуйста, не забывайте о точках пересечения тротуаров и дорог. они должны иметь общую точку
Anton “Shadow” (2018-08-15 16:24:05+00:00): Извините, учту.
Warin61 (2018-08-14 06:36:51+00:00): Hi,
This changeset has broken the admin boundary Lang Lang, Yannathan and Caldermeade. 
Partial reversion of this changeset to restore these relations.
FromLublinn (2018-08-13 16:47:17+00:00): Na warstwie podstawowej, element plac/ deptak zasłania nowo dodany element mur. Czy istnieje możliwość odsłonięcia takiego elementu? Proszę o pomoc
kasmar00 (2018-08-15 17:43:58+00:00): Dodałem (na razie do części) tag layer=1 a do placu layer=0.
FromLublinn (2018-08-16 17:30:28+00:00): Dzięki :) dokończyłem, mam nadzieję że zadzaiała
Hjart (2018-08-13 16:43:45+00:00): Undlad venligst at slette tags du ikke forstår. Som her f.eks. det wikidata tag.
AshlyAsh (2018-08-13 17:49:48+00:00): Jeg mente, at jeg trykkede på fortryd, men det fik jeg vist ikke gjort rigtigt.
b-unicycling (2023-03-27 18:40:05+00:00): GIbt es dort eine tatsaechliche Milchrampe oder nur eine Informationstafel? Falls dort tatsaechlich eine Milchrampe steht, bitte den neuen Tag man_made=milk_churn_stand verwenden. Danke!
Pirolina (2023-03-27 18:58:01+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, da dort wirklich eine Milchrampe steht diese eingetragen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10766974941
b-unicycling (2023-03-28 10:30:38+00:00): Ich hab mir gestern auch die Muehe gemacht und die Wiki-Seite uebersetzt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dmilk_churn_stand
Pirolina (2023-03-30 19:37:29+00:00): 👍
Borut@OSM (2018-08-13 21:16:57+00:00): Aus meiner Sicht: Doch ein Kreisverkehr (local_knowledge).
luschi (2018-08-14 11:01:00+00:00): Anhand der Überkopfschilder laut Mapillary erkennt man nicht dass es ein Kreisverkehr sein soll.
Hier sind immer nur die Pfeile "leicht links" oder "leicht rechts".
Eine Ansage von zB. "Nehmen sie die dritte Ausfahrt" ist etwas verwirrend wenn man dann solche Schilder antrift wie im folgenden Link: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.33560451&lng=15.01332608&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=wsDy7sbVenTaU0xBANYkYA     
Es steht dir natürlich frei den Kreisverkehr wieder zu erfassen. Wenn du das machst sollte Kreisverkehr und Einbahnstraße nicht zusammen verwendet werden.
lg
Borut@OSM (2018-08-14 13:02:46+00:00): OK, danke, Du hast mich überzeugt. (In den Köpfen der Einheimischen, mich inklusive, ist das eher ein Kreisverkehr, aber vor Ort für die Ortsfremde als solcher schwer wahr zu nehmen.) Danke also für Deine Revision.
luschi (2018-08-14 13:57:58+00:00): Ein kleines Krisverkehr-Schild etwas vor dem oben verlinkten Bild scheint es zu geben.
Ich würde das als Ortsunkundiger wahrscheinlich übersehen, da ich damit beschäftigt wäre die Schilder zu lesen um die richtige Ausfahrt nicht zu verpassen.
lg
Ivortizma (2018-08-13 16:48:44+00:00): À reviser
bbmiller (2018-08-13 20:08:50+00:00): Thanks for improving the map! I checked your edits and cleaned up the roads a bit, but they looked good!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61632735
atcomapper (2018-08-13 18:30:54+00:00): Please do not move around Danish address nodes! Their exact placement is defined by the law (perpendicular to the longest wall facing the street, 3 metres from the wall by the main entrance).
All addresses in Denmark are imported from an official government database and maintained automatically.
Ivortizma (2018-08-13 16:54:33+00:00): À reviser
Leo Slager (2018-08-13 18:52:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
ToniE (2018-08-14 07:58:46+00:00): Hello dmouhama,

welcome to OSM.

The gate also blocks the cycleway, because you've set it to the intersection of the cycleway with the service way.

I've shifted the gate a bit towards SW, thus only blocking the service way.

Best regards
Toni
dmouhama (2018-08-14 16:42:02+00:00): Thank you for rectifying this Toni. 

Best,
Hjart (2018-08-13 17:11:16+00:00): Please do not move the imported danish adresses. The bot will automatically move them back.Also if you want to be really accurate and uptodate, I can recommend using the national danish SDFE aerial imagery.
ovruni (2023-09-13 22:33:57+00:00): Se agrego parque ficticio dentro del estadio
Rotflamingo2 (2021-03-22 11:10:24+00:00): Hallo JochenOSM,
wäre es in diesem Fall nicht geschickter, die Adressdaten dem Haus zuzuordnen anstatt dem Weingut? Das Haus kann auch ohne Weingut existieren, umgekehrt ist es schlecht möglich.
JochenOSM (2021-04-06 17:58:49+00:00): Erledigt
abakus_uploader (2018-08-13 22:30:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
AsgerFrank (2018-08-13 21:33:23+00:00): Man kunne godt bruge en angivelse af baggrunden for rettelsen; hvad kilden er til at banen vides nedlagt.
AshlyAsh (2018-08-13 22:04:33+00:00): Jeg bor i nærheden af den nu nedlagte bane og går dagligt forbi den, derfor ved jeg, at den blevet nedlagt.
Der vil vistnok blive anlagt en i nærheden af DGI Huset mere ved jeg ikke.
AshlyAsh (2018-08-13 22:24:04+00:00): Udover ovenstående, så ved jeg, at Legeparken Dragehaven skal renoveres, da den er meget nedslidt og at fjernelsen af skateboardbanen blot er begyndelsen på ændringerne
AsgerFrank (2018-08-14 09:28:18+00:00): Rigtig godt, så skal man jo bare skrive dét. Det kunne være så kort som survey eller, hvis man er til det, mere uddybende prosa. 
Det kan være i kommentaren til ændringssættet eller i det felt Kilder, iD præsenterer før upload, eller i visse tilfælde som et source-tag på objektet.
zors1843 (2018-08-13 19:39:11+00:00): What kind of artwork ? Artist ?
Martin Borsje (2018-08-13 18:58:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Verder kun je import van huizen verzoeken via het BAG import forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52973
user_5359 (2018-08-18 10:42:33+00:00): Hello! Short comment to your import: the correct notation is roof:shape instead rroof:shape
user_1566574 (2021-09-27 22:35:38+00:00): Bonsoir,
Un chemin a été modifié car JOSM considérait la valeur comme étant une erreur, j'espère que ça convient ainsi : https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/616726247

(Plus, il ne me semble pas que la valeur "service" de la clé "access" existe :/)

Merci !
Jose Luis Infante (2018-08-14 22:15:27+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu contribución.

Solamente comentar un detalle. Has introducido un nuevo nombre de vía. 

Procura que el nombre siempre incluya el tipo de vía que es. Aquí lo correcto sería "carrer de Rafael Sáinz de la Cuesta".

Ten en cuenta que es importante incluir esos datos en el nombre, ya que como bien debes saber, puede que un nombre se repita varias veces en un municipio pero se tratarían de vías diferentes. 

Por ejemplo, "carrer de Menorca", "avinguda de Menorca", "passatge de Menorca", etc.

Un saludo!
Beddhist (2018-10-21 14:06:02+00:00): Way: 616670002: you changed this from unclassified to service. On both DGP and Bing (slightly better) I can see 3 distinct road surfaces: wide asphalt with marker lines at the N end, then concrete, then dirt. Given that this services several buildings plus fields I suggest marking this as residential and splitting it into a paved an unpaved section. The continuation S over the bridge should also be changed to unpaved residential. The junction with the highway needs to be moved to align with the image (it's not even parallel.) The same goes for the other junction in the S. There doesn't appear to be an offset with either images, so the alignment should be good. That bridge was well spotted!
VLD052 (2019-02-25 16:39:27+00:00): I totally understand. I will certainly inspect the details of the road more thoroughly. Thank you for the detailed explanations!
VictorIE (2020-01-14 16:31:30+00:00): Lots of the details at Fairways SuperValu are now on the Esri World Imagery
Marabu_Too (2020-01-15 00:01:39+00:00): Thanks - hadn't  noticed that.
Unfortunately, due to pressing work, I won't have the time (at least not the leisure) to deal with this until mid February.
Then I'll definitely take a closer look to see whether someone else has already improved on my GPS track .
viloan (2018-08-13 18:38:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-08-13 18:48:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
datendelphin (2018-08-13 19:55:06+00:00): hi oakily. 
map.geo.admin.ch is not a valid source, Their terms do not allow the data to be used for OpenStreetMap. Internet is rather unspecific. Writing something like "homepage of the hospital" would be better. 
best regards
oakily (2018-08-13 20:18:08+00:00): Hi datendelphin, thanks, I will follow your input on any future changes. Regards
eggie (2018-09-08 06:29:28+00:00): Nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen?  Bij deze alsnog... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-09-08 06:37:49+00:00): review.. Meestal taggen we bij op de adresnode. Dan is adres gekoppeld aan de aard van bedrijf/instelling/muziekschool.
Liever niet name=  op een gebouw zetten, behalve als het gebouw die naam draagt. 
Gebouwen worden niet zelf getekend in OSM, maar op verzoek geimporteerd via het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. ('k Zie dat het niet bij het Kadaster bekend is)
Ik pas wat aan, want building = yes ontbreekt ook. 
Dit was je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61635854
eggie (2018-09-08 06:44:09+00:00): Je zou alle info kunnen toevoegen op adresnode 21, want het adres komt nu 2x voor in de database en dan verschuif je die node wat naar het zuiden.
mueschel (2018-08-15 14:46:23+00:00): Hi,
you used the tags 'dirtype=1' and 'type=*' on 26 objects. These are no common tags - could you explain what this means or remove them if they were added by mistake?

Thanks, Jan
kartonage (2018-08-14 09:00:24+00:00): Hallo voland87,
danke für das Hinzufügen von Gebäuden. Kleiner Tipp für die Bearbeitung mit dem iD-Editor: bei ausgewähltem Objekt kannst du das Objekt mit 's' rechteckig machen. Hilfreich bei Gebäuden, da diese ja meist rechteckig sind. 

Schöne Grüße
voland87 (2018-08-14 09:16:29+00:00): Hallo kartonage,
danke für den Tipp - die Funktion kannte ich noch nicht! Ich werde in den nächsten Tagen die Gebäude dann nochmal korrigieren :-)
Beste Grüße!
BCNorwich (2018-08-22 07:19:24+00:00): Hi, semi detached or adjoining buildings should have their party walls joined in OSM. There should not be a gap however minute nor should the be an overlap as is evident in the buildings you've added in this changeset.

If you need help getting this right please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2018-08-29 07:46:34+00:00): I've retified the problems here for you, I think I've got the all. It would be a great help and make the map look better if you could consider the above points in the future.

Regards Bernard
ndm (2018-08-14 22:38:32+00:00): Looks like the whole of Corsham is now a church -- I think you tagged the wrong way -- easily done.
Erik Wolfe (2018-08-13 20:11:49+00:00): Here's the url for the website for the location just to confirm location, hours and general info accuracy. www.stollandwolfe.com
muralito (2018-08-13 23:09:37+00:00): Hola alephcero.

Ten en cuenta que poner motor_vehicle=yes significa que cualquier vehiculo a motor (autos, motos, camiones, buses) pueden circular por el.

Probablemente el cambio que hiciste no es lo que intentaste. Cuando cambies algo ya mapeado no te lleves solo por tu intuicion, revisa la documentacion del wiki para ver si lo que intentas es lo que logras, o si es que hay algo mal en ese aspecto.
alephcero (2018-08-14 12:37:33+00:00): Hola muralito, gracias por tus comentarios. Lei la documentacion, y  dice: "access=no, bus=yes means that only buses are allowed to enter (for example a road only for buses)"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Transport_mode_restrictions

Creo que la restriccion de motor_vehicle es para todo vehiculo motorizado, lo que incluye buses y ambulancias. No deberia eliminarse esa etiqueta?

Te comento los motivos originales del cambio, al descargar los datos de OSM usando la libreria de python osmnx (https://github.com/gboeing/osmnx) no me descargaba el metrobus 9 de julio sentido norte y si el sur. Encontre que la diferencia era esa etiqueta. Entiendo que osmnx no es una libreria oficial, pero me parecia que el compartamiento tan disimil en el metrobus 9 de julio era extraño. Como sería la nomenclatura correcta? Es posible eliminar la especificacion de motor_vehicle (ni si ni no) y poner acces=no y bus=yes" como dice la doc?
muralito (2018-08-14 14:11:58+00:00): En el caso particular de tu cambio, entiendo que el problema es agregar el motor_vehicle=yes. No se si todos los consumidores evaluan el acceso de igual forma, pero al encontrar esa etiqueta que es bien directa, es que cualquier vehiculo motorizado lo puede usar.

Por la mejor forma de resolverlo, te recomiendo contactar con Agustin https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AgusQui que ha mapeado gran parte del metrobus, y debe tener la casuistica mas clara que yo.
muralito (2018-08-13 23:04:17+00:00): Hola alephcero.

El monumento a la coima existe y es bien conocido, no entiendo porque lo editaste como lo hiciste.
alephcero (2018-08-14 12:43:26+00:00): Muralito, te pido mil disculpas. No había entendido la referencia a la estatua.
muralito (2018-08-14 13:25:08+00:00): No hace falta pedir disculpas. Avisame si no lo podes corregir que yo lo hago.
RicoElectrico (2018-08-14 07:38:08+00:00): Cześć, a adresy to same się poprawią? ;-)

Na pewno jutro na poniższej mapie będą żółte "mrówki", bo nie zgadza się nazwa ulicy z nazwą ulicy w adresie.

http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy/#18/54.36311/18.61152
kasmar00 (2018-08-14 15:53:21+00:00): Mrówek nie będzie bo nazwa nie została zmieniona na całej długości :)
Czy mimo braku liczebnika w nazwie oficjalnej nie powinniśmy go dodać (tak samo jak rozwijamy tytuły i imiona)? Nazwę bez liczebnika widziałbym w polu official_name.
Akkurator (2019-08-25 23:47:28+00:00): Hallo Cherub,
sicher, dass der Name Burgdobelweg ist und nicht Burgtobelweg? Wäre eine sehr ungewöhnliche Schreibweise. Es heißt ja auch Burgtobelgraben.
Grüße, Akkurator
Cherub (2019-08-27 14:16:11+00:00): Hallo!
Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass es in dieser Schreibweise auf den Schildern stand. Aber ich schaue die nächste Zeit dann mal vobei, um sicher zu gehen.
Grüße!
Cherub (2019-09-01 12:27:57+00:00): War heute noch einmal vor Ort und habe 2 Schilder mit der Schreibweise "Burgdobelweg" und 2 mit "Burgtobelweg" gefunden. Da die mit "t" aber offizieller aussehen, passe ich den Namen an!
ulmtuelp (2018-09-13 09:49:23+00:00): Selfintersection way without tag. Could be removed?
marc__marc (2024-10-10 01:25:00+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5830635850
que veux dire C+O ?
Cordialement,
Marc
abrensch (2018-08-15 06:34:55+00:00): Hi markzawi,

you added this "only straigt" restriction:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8529635

but that breaks the crossing