piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FraukeLeo (2021-10-22 06:12:54+00:00): Hallo Rentner49, die Straßen sind an diesen Stellen schon längst als Brücken angelegt. Dann ist es unnötig, den Bach noch als Tunnel zu mappen. Entweder Brücke oder Tunnel, aber nicht beides :)
Brian@Brea (2021-03-10 17:02:07+00:00): Hello, just checking out your first changeset (100787426) to the OpenStreetMap Project. I noticed that you included personal data in your data including locations that pertain to your residency.  While adding buildings or places that you are familiar with, including your own house, please do not include your own personal identity to the buildings. This map publicly viewed worldwide and should not be taken as a personal project.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-03-10 15:19:16+00:00): 既然如标签所说是一个填海造陆区域的话，还在填海中（而且卫星图也确认了这一点），使用已经平整好的greenfield标签不合适吧？而是使用填充这一特性的landfill更合适？
MxxCon (2021-03-10 20:25:07+00:00): Hello.
Note that per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone phone numbers must follow ITU-T E.164 format. 
Additionally, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description that field MUST NOT be used for advertisements. 
As such these changes will be fixed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100787603
Kachkaev (2021-03-10 22:19:00+00:00): Привет, спасибо за правку!

Я тут случайно заметил на https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/14Ul, что у https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/768277985 не хватает addr:street, исправил.

Где-то видел на вики, что в случае, когда нет ярко выраженной улицы, вместо addr:street можно использовать addr:place, мол, это одно и тоже. Можно и так оставить — разницы особо нет.

Если захочешь поменять все addr:street, это проще делать в JOSM — там есть поиск по комбинации тегов. Если интересно, могу как-нибудь показать!
MxxCon (2021-03-10 20:28:51+00:00): Hello.
Note that per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone phone numbers must follow ITU-T E.164 format. 
Additionally, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description that field MUST NOT be used for advertisements. 
Finally, hours of operation must follow a format as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours As such these changes will be fixed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100787901
zuicz (2021-03-11 10:51:28+00:00): Powrót po 3 latach :O
Powodzenia w dalszej pracy!
habi (2021-03-10 21:06:33+00:00): Ciao 

Auch hier lohnt es sich, die Gebäude rechtwinklig einzuzeichnen, die meisten Gebäude sind es ja auch :)

In iD geht das mit dem 'q'-Shortcut, wie du hier lesen kannst: https://learnosm.org/de/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Gruss,
habi
MxxCon (2021-03-10 20:31:32+00:00): Hello.
Note that per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone phone numbers must follow ITU-T E.164 format. 
Additionally, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description that field MUST NOT be used for advertisements. 
As such these changes will be fixed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100788116
MxxCon (2021-03-10 20:35:43+00:00): Hello.
Note that per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone phone numbers must follow ITU-T E.164 format. 
Additionally, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description that field MUST NOT be used for advertisements. 
Finally, hours of operation must follow a format as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours 
As such these changes will be fixed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100788434
eggie (2021-03-10 15:49:27+00:00): Tja.. al die OSM regels!
Oke.. maar we doen +31  
Het internationale toegangsnummer is vaak 00, maar niet overal.. in de VS is het 011 bv.
Dus +
Kijk je nog even?

eggie
MxxCon (2021-03-10 20:41:17+00:00): Hello.
Note that per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone phone numbers must follow ITU-T E.164 format. 
Additionally, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description that field MUST NOT be used for advertisements. 
Finally, hours of operation must follow a format as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours 
As such these changes will be fixed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100788610
alessandrocarmeli (2021-03-10 16:31:15+00:00): Ottimo lavoro!
Mannivu (2021-03-10 16:43:31+00:00): Grazie! Ho modificato da museo ad attrazione perché, dopo aver fatto ricerche, non mi sembra esserci un museo.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-03-10 20:02:45+00:00): Se così dici allora va benissimo!
MxxCon (2021-03-10 20:52:12+00:00): Hello.
Note that per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone phone numbers must follow ITU-T E.164 format. 
Additionally, per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description that field MUST NOT be used for advertisements. 
Finally, hours of operation must follow a format as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours 
As such these changes will be fixed.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100788773
◪ Jarv (2021-03-10 19:55:03+00:00): Hi Peter
The crossing was mapped correctly before the change.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=traffic%20signals?uselang=en-GB#Traffic_signals_for_pedestrians
If you wish to add the traffic signals as separate nodes on the stop lines as highway=traffic_signals then you can (although this isn't standard practice on crossing not associated with a junction). Since it is a traffic light controlled crossing it should be mapped as highway=crossing & crossing=traffic_signals

Kind Regards,
Thomas
ottwiz (2021-03-25 23:31:35+00:00): I appreciate your activity that you do here, but first of all, you should take in mind, that there is a huge difference between landuses. not all areas are grasslands. Most of the areas here are used for farming, there are rare exceptions which aren't farmed, those are literally areas at nowhere, for example there is a good example in Coshocton County, Ohio. (Woodbury wildlife are). Also, areas which are dominated by houses mostly should be mapped residential (especially if the area has a name)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland

Also, if you map things, try to map it as accurate as you can see. Other stuff, the imagery. NAIP is the freshest, and should be used for tracing, but Bing can also be  used, just then compare with NAIP (National Agricultural Imagery Program)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Marshall_County,_West_Virginia  This page is written by me and tells the experiences I did in Marshall County (yes, i made a lot of landcovering there)

I hope I could help you.
Dimacn (2021-03-11 06:04:59+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, зачем вы добавили парк отдыха поверх давно существующего парка ? - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915518354  По поводу парка https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915518355 - Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Пожалуйста удалите оба добавленных вами парка.
pitscheplatsch (2021-03-11 06:26:49+00:00): Hi DeanCC, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
alesarrett (2021-08-07 06:13:34+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che nell'inserire vari edifici hai disegnato delle geometrie irregolari e imprecise. Se stai usando l'editor iD, puoi facilmente rendere le geometrie squadrate 8angoli a 90°) selezionando la geometria e cliccando il tasto Q
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100790129
faustopt (2021-03-21 15:43:50+00:00): Nome Incorreto/Utilização abusiva de marca Registada - A utilização da marca "Kónica" para identificar Centros de Cópias/Fotografia é incorreta. "Konica" é uma marca registada (Hoje Konica-Minolta) e a sua identificação em estabelecimentos que nada tem a ver com a referida marca não só é errado como induz em erro para quem procura serviços de venda/manutenção da referida marca. A utilização de nomes informais está bem documentada na wiki e deve ser consultada em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:name 
Neste caso específico deve ser incluida a Etiqueta Nome Local (loc_name=) pois essa designação representa um regionalismo ou nome local pelo qual estes estabelecimentos são conhecidos em Angola, tal como no Brasil são conhecidos por “Xerox”.
A Edição será alterada para:
name=Centro de Cópias/Fotografia
loc_name=Kónica
faustopt (2021-03-31 14:38:26+00:00): Porque razão está tudo em MAIÚSCULAS? A Regra é em Capitulares (Promeira letra de cada palavra em Maiúscula). Se é iniciante no OSM Antes de editar consulte as Boas Práticas em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas
user_5359 (2021-03-10 18:42:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the nature reserve and not just one node.
Kona Cloud Forest Guided Walking Tours (2021-03-10 20:04:03+00:00): I used the Area tool to draw the boundries. Let me know if this is correct. Thanks!
ivanbranco (2021-03-10 18:09:47+00:00): Ciao Andrei,

ho visto che hai richiesto una review. Dei consigli che posso darti sono di squadrare gli edifici, puoi farlo cliccando con il destro sull'edificio o semplicemente cliccando Q sulla tastiera quando l'edificio è selezionato. Ricordati poi che si disegna la base dell'edificio, non il tetto. Per finire ti consiglio di usare le immagini aeree di Esri Clarity al posto di Bing, quantomeno in questa zona.
faustopt (2021-03-31 14:36:33+00:00): Porque razão está tudo em MAIÚSCULAS? A Regra é em Capitulares (Promeira letra de cada palavra em Maiúscula). Se é iniciante no OSM Antes de editar consulte as Boas Práticas em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-13 06:35:31+00:00): Hi Farras, 
Your edit looks awesome, but there is a crossing Highway:path between water:pond
Please check again https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/915535255 and repaired.
If you have any other suggestions, Please Let me know.
(https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142906312)

Happy Mapping
marczoutendijk (2021-03-12 15:24:24+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100917099
marczoutendijk (2021-03-12 15:32:33+00:00): User blocked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4805
marc__marc (2021-03-31 18:41:06+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8504256360
l'ancienne prison a-t-elle été détruite et remplacé par la prairie ? ou la prison est devenue palais de justice ?
Cordialement,
Marc
corfede (2021-03-12 15:25:57+00:00): Ciao, ho visto i tuoi numerosi edit in Porto Cesareo e ti ringrazio per l'aggiunta dettagliata della toponomastica, anche se non mi è chiara la fonte. A parte questa curiosità ho notato che spesso sposti strade e fabbricati per adattarli alle foto Bing, che sono abbastanza disallineate in questa zona (oltre che molto datate). Considera che tutto l'edificato è stato importato un po' di anni fa dalla CTR, che invece è molto precisa riguardo al posizionamento (lo verifico costantemente con rilievi GNSS di precisione). Ti prego quindi per gli edit in Puglia, di riallineare le foto Bing in base ai fabbricati importati e non viceversa. Grazie mille, Federico.
procuste (2021-03-14 09:32:43+00:00): Buongiorno, scusami ma pensavo che il problema fosse negli elementi della mappa che per qualche motivo erano spostati rispetto alla foto di sfondo e non viceversa. Non sapevo si potessero riallineare le foto Bing, spero di non aver fatto troppi danni.
Per quanto riguarda i dati, avevo trovato sul sito della pro loco un pdf in cui era riportata la nuova toponomastica con l'indicazione delle strade, ma ho visto che non è troppo affidabile (alcuni nomi di personaggi storici sono errati, alcune indicazioni non corrispondono) perciò confronto le informazioni con altri siti e con le delibere comunali che sono riuscito a trovare.
corfede (2021-03-14 10:18:49+00:00): Figurati non ci sono problemi, ho già risistemato quasi tutto, lasciando i nomi e le aggiunte da te inserite. Oltre a riallineare gli oggetti ho recuperato alcuni fabbricati che avevi cancellato,  in realtà più recenti delle foto Bing. Invece che riallineare quelle ti conviene usare foto più nuove (tipo le Maxar). Non so se siano disponibili in iD ma sicuramente puoi usarle in JOSM. Per quanto riguarda le fonti la cosa migliore sono certamente le delibere comunali e la cartellonistica sul posto. Con le altre mappe meglio andare cauti, sia perché non è detto che siano attendibili, ma soprattutto perché spesso la loro licenza non è compatibile con OSM. Grazie per la gentile risposta e a presto. Federico
eggie (2021-03-10 18:47:52+00:00): Review.. Er ontbreekt nog een klein stukje in de relatie voor 
roundtrip=yes
Hoort dat niet bij de route?
Ik heb de wandelroute al gesplitst.
Verder heb je wellicht hier iets aan..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Mountain_biking
Routerelaties kun je het beste bewerken met editor JOSM

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-10 18:50:11+00:00): Klein stukje track toegevoegd dus nu  roundtrip. 
roundtrip=yes toegevoegd
Enna_t (2021-03-10 20:30:26+00:00): Bedankt voor de review, het toevoegen van het missende stukje van de route en de andere tips.
Dimacn (2021-03-11 05:54:05+00:00): Вы некорректно изменили перекрёсток. Скорее всего потому, что вы здесь не живёте. Я уже отменил ваш ченжсет и затем сделал как правильно.
LiztenUp (2021-03-12 17:11:05+00:00): Спасибо за обновление перекрестка.
dieterdreist (2024-01-31 17:45:46+00:00): Buonasera Paolo, ho notato che hai modificato alcuni path da bicycle=yes in bicycle=designated. Questo significherebbe di escludere i pedoni, è stato l'intenzione? Perché ho notato che vi passano dei sentieri escursionistici, e mi sembra improbabile questo tipo di restrizione. 
Saluti,
Martin
Syl (2021-05-13 16:46:13+00:00): Bonjour, il y a ici deux chênes au même endroit : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3759585357 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1301286976
C'est le même arbre ?
Koun (2021-05-14 08:10:44+00:00): Oui vu et corrigé.
Merci !
dergrosse (2021-05-13 21:35:55+00:00): Hi trailschneck. I do not think that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8504391761 actually is a ford. I have been there today again and do not think there will be ever water flowing over this way. Do you mind if I remove the "ford" tag?
trailschneck (2021-05-14 08:44:18+00:00): Hi, im Prinzip hast du recht. Ich denke das ist mehr für meteorlogische Notfälle. Ich hab die Furt entfernt.
Gruß Siegfried
dergrosse (2021-05-14 15:47:38+00:00): Cool, danke. Gruß Alex
felipeeugenio (2021-03-10 17:22:25+00:00): not a kaart edition. a mistake was made naming the changeset
Puxan (2021-03-11 17:34:22+00:00): Muy bien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100793115
tux67 (2021-03-11 08:01:42+00:00): Hi,
da der Weg jetzt vor und nach dem wall die gleiche Klassifikation (unclassified) hat, hättest du nicht splitten müssen (ist aber auch nicht schlimm).
Sonst ok
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100793316
opendcc (2021-03-10 18:34:16+00:00): Please split your changeset to smaller areas. Thanks.
Fabien1309 (2021-03-10 17:36:32+00:00): Depuis 2021, pas 2020 :)
BCNorwich (2021-03-14 08:41:12+00:00): fiction removed
Cristoffs (2021-03-14 22:51:26+00:00): Po pierwsze nie opisuj tak swoich zmian. Po drugie na jakiej podstawie dokonałeś tych zmian?
moreno96 (2021-03-10 18:29:57+00:00): سلام
اسم انگلیسی، فیلد مخصوص خودش رو داره
لطفا از اضافه کردنش به name خودداری کنید
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-11 14:59:06+00:00): أخ فالح أشكرك جزيل الشكر على مساهمتك في الخريطة ، وأقترح إضافة الوسم:
natural=cave_entrance
للدلالة على أنه غار لكان أفضل، ويمكنك فعل ذلك بشكل تلقائي وآلي عبر أوسماند وذلك باختيار النوع "مدخل كهف" وسيضع البرنامج الوسم بشكل تلقائي.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-11 15:01:18+00:00): وأنا سأقوم بوضعه في جميع المواقع التي أضفتها وإذا احتجت المزيد من الشرح فلا مانع لدي هنا في التعليقات أو عبر المجموعة الرسمية في تيلقرام:
https://t.me/OSMSaudi
ToniE (2021-03-10 18:26:14+00:00): Hi jcloquell,

this is a very unusual mapping of an access restriction to a road.

wouldn't it be better to limit the access to that road for motor_vehicles only (as you did with some other road here)?

The 4 turn restrictions would then be superfluous.

Br
Toni
jcloquell (2021-03-10 18:55:18+00:00): Hi ToniE,

first of all, excuse me if I did something wrong, I'm kind of new to OSM.

Yes, I restricted it at first for motor_vehicles, but I realised that there is a part of the street that is not restricted, only the part where the turn to the main road happens (according to Google Maps). So I thought that maybe forbidding the turn from (and to) the main road would do the job.

If you think there is a better way to tag this let me know. I could also revert it to restrict the access to motor_vehicles if you think it makes more sense.

Cheers,
Jorge
ToniE (2021-03-10 19:32:26+00:00): Servus Jorge,

no worries, everyone was somehow new to OSM.

Looking at Mapillary data

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.35859281078916&lng=10.906975718170884&z=17&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=LFyVgncjwothci046UmNlg&focus=photo

it appears to me that highway=service is wrong at least - since 10 years.
Could be a highway=path with shared access for foot and bicycle and other tags.

Having modified this, there is no need for turn restrictions, 'cause motor_vehicles aren't allowed anyway on "path".

Additionally, "emergency=yes" would be OK allowing fire brigades, ... to access the area.

But, hmm, there's a lot to change anyway.

Secondly: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1258874186 is a node (wrongly placed?) where the barrier=bollard does allow only foot/bicycle to pass.

Anyway: Once the area has been revised, the turn restrictions are no longer necessary, and in the end they are even wrong then.

Turn restrictions aren't used to describe the right of use for a destination road. access=, foot=, bicycle=, vehicle=, motor_vehicle=, motorcar=, motor_cycle=, bus=, psv=, horse=, dog=, .... no/private/permissive/yes/agricultural/forestry/destination/delivery/... allows for a very granular tagging.

Kindly have look on the Map-Features ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features

The Augburg Community has a monthly pub meeting https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Augsburg/Stammtisch
I done know whether this is online now (Corona).

In Munich, the next online pub meeting is tomorrow at 7 PM https://meet.ffmuc.net/OSMStammtischMuenchen (Jitsi server)

There's also a forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 (asking in English is OK).

Best regards,
Toni
ToniE (2021-03-10 19:34:59+00:00): BTW: "(according to Google Maps)"

Google Maps is a strict no-go!

It's an illegal source of information as are all other copyright'ed sources where we do not have an explicit permission to use them.

Cheers,
Toni
jcloquell (2021-03-11 15:57:14+00:00): Hallo Toni,

thank you so much for all this information and the legal tips!!

I'll revert the turn restrictions I added yesterday, and try to add some of the tags you mentioned to fix the wrong data.

Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Jorge
ToniE (2021-03-12 19:51:29+00:00): Hi Jorge, 

I've been busy today in this areas based on mapillary images.

I changed a lot, added tags to ways, ... just have a look.

Cheers,
Toni
marc__marc (2021-03-16 00:00:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Si une rue est marquée comme publique alors qu'elle est privée, la bonne solution est de la renseignée comme privée et non pas de l'effacer.
je l'ai par conséquent rétablit. c'est d'autant plus nécessaire parce que sinon un autre utilisateur la rajoutera, sans l'information privé et le cycle recommencera
Cordialement,
Marc
*Martin* (2021-08-18 22:03:57+00:00): Prosim nedavaj popis trasy do jej nazvu, nepatri tam. Dakujem.
czubi (2021-03-12 14:31:20+00:00): Bist du da an der richtigen Stelle mit der "Kriminalpolizeiinspektion". Ist ja nicht mehr die Kranichfelder Straße?. Oder gilt die Adresse  "Kranichfelder Str. 1" nach dem Umbau jetzt für das gesamte Objekt? Wenn es richtig ist sei bitte so wenn und schiebe es von der Wiese IN einen Hausumriss. danke.
timmito (2021-03-10 18:27:46+00:00): Hallo FFW Heistenbach und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! amenity=fire_station Freiwillige Feuerwehr Heistenbach ist jetzt zweimal vorhanden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8503698998 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8504587265 Bitte eins davon wieder löschen, es ist ja schließlich nur eine Feuerwehr vorhanden.
FFW Heistenbach (2021-03-10 18:41:22+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, timmito. Ist gelöscht.
totera (2021-03-23 22:29:21+00:00): Non mi pare ci sia consenso sull'utilizzo di questo schema, tantomeno sulla sostituzione dello schema addr:* dove presente.
Perché poi migrare soltanto via e civico ed eliminare del tutto città e CAP?
ivanbranco (2021-03-24 05:05:36+00:00): I civici identificano univocamente un ingresso e prima erano presenti più di dieci civici identici. Lo Bremen schema è comunque documentato e in uso, e ho preferito mantenere l'informazione in quel modo piuttosto che eliminare i tag addr: e basta

Dalla wiki: "Di solito le informazioni sull'indirizzo non devono essere duplicate; questo significa che ci dovrebbe essere un solo addr:housenumber=*"
mueschel (2021-03-11 11:54:29+00:00): Hi,
you added thousands of buildings with a 'json_id' tag. Please check & fix that.
eggie (2021-03-10 18:58:09+00:00): Beste Rob.. Je het je weg verbonden met de spoorlijn.
Ik kijk even of het simpel is op te lossen en anders draai ik de changeset terug.
Go Map is wat dat betref een rampeneditor, Je mapte eerst met josm. Die is vele malen beter.


Even niet mappen hier
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-10 19:06:23+00:00): Ik heb de schade heersteld. Routeren doet het echt niet meer als je op wegen waar fietsers mogen rijden bicycle=use_sidepath gaat taggen. 
Aansluiting Kamper Wetering met de Bisschopswetering

De enorne knoop met de spoorlijn en de wgen die over elkaar lagen hersteld.
Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot voor één changeset. en zeker voor een belabberde als Go Map.
Kijk svp waar je de fout in ingin en beperk het gebied van je edits.
Er was veel te veel schade.
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100795751
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-10 19:07:28+00:00): Tip..  Verplaats je in een fietser... Volg dan een route als fietser. Dan zul je zien dat bicycle=side_path niet overal zomaar kan.
eggie (2021-03-10 19:13:20+00:00): Het kruispunt Stuurmansweg / Bisschopswetering  weer helemaal uit de knoop gehaald. 
Werk je wellicht op een tablet.. Mijn advies is om dan ommiddelijk te stoppen met dit soort aanpassingen met editor GoMap  en dit op een normale computer te doen met een reguliere editor zodat je overzicht houdt wat je aan het doen bent. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-10 19:44:06+00:00): Nu ik toch aan het checken ben.
bicycle=use_sidepath klopt daar niet. 
De Oude wetering vanaf de Stuurmans weg heeft volges de tagging een G13 bord. Dat is dus een onverplicht fietspad. Je mag dus gewoon fietsen op de hoofdrijbaan.
eggie (2021-03-10 19:48:23+00:00): Op alle wegen waar je use_sidepath hebt getagd kan het weer weg want het zijn G13 fietspaden.
Heb je hier rekening mee gehouden?
eggie (2021-03-10 20:12:04+00:00): Maar even nu zelf bicycle=use_sidepath verwijderd.
Het was dus allemaal correct getagd hier door de voorgaande mapper. 
Er staan hier geen G11 borden . het zijn G13 fietspaden.. Dus onverplichte fietspaden. 
Revert lukte even niet meer.
george1201 (2024-05-06 21:20:29+00:00): Zwei Spielplätze (als Knoten) direkt nebeneinander? Oder ist es doch nur einer? Vielleicht ein Knoten zuviel?
george1201 (2024-05-08 20:10:06+00:00): Ah, verstehe. Die zwei Knoten sind schon länger da. StreetComplete hat dir dann zweimal die gleiche Frage gestellt. Aber weil du ja vor Ort warst, kannst du meine Ausgangsfrage vielleicht beantworten. Sind dort zwei getrennte Spielplätze, oder ist es doch nur einer?