piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2021-07-01 13:40:57+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Could you say more on what the resting place is because as tagged it's not recognised or rendered by OSM? The same applies to the two rest areas?

Regards Bernard.
Jakka (2021-07-01 12:56:15+00:00): Toevoeging weg ok. Eens de woning bekijken met de AIV GRB laag staan wat dicht bij de weg. Enkel grond contact wordt ingetekend ;)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107258960
DP24PH (2021-07-01 12:52:35+00:00): This changeset is featured in the latest #Mapping101 Thursdays Season 2 Episode 1 via DP24 General TV (at 16:00 PHST timeslot): https://www.facebook.com/DP24PH/videos/4025640007552395/
archie (2022-06-22 05:23:01+00:00): Även i detta changeset har du raderat - målmedvetet - ett sjömärke som fortfarande är giltigt (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107259281). Jag kan med bästa vilja inte se vilket samband det raderade sjömärket har med dina övriga ändringar. Varför har du raderat sjömärket?
Diógenes de Sinope (2021-07-01 13:16:55+00:00): 👍🏿
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 07:48:37+00:00): Hey, whats here with driveways? ;)
srderang (2021-07-02 12:59:35+00:00): Hi SafetyIng, 
Thanks for checking my edits. I have added service=driveway tag as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107312261) with suggested modifications. 
Regards, 
srderang.
letihu (2021-08-21 21:13:18+00:00): Hallo,
bitte verbinde nicht Wege mit Wasser, wenn sie sich nicht wirklich treffen.
Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4345750441/history
fehlt vielleicht eine Brücke oder ein Tunnel.
MarkusHD (2022-07-26 09:29:58+00:00): Die Verbindung vom Feldweg zur Landstraße ging hier verloren, hab es behoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124085887

Die Lage der Landstraße hat sich in dieser Änderung eher verschlechtert, aber da hab ich jetzt nichts gemacht.
PT-53 (2021-07-02 06:15:45+00:00): Hallo b*k*,
hier liegen jeweils 2 Gebäude übereinander:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194213130/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/960090499/history

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
FGrüße
user_70413 (2021-07-02 09:31:47+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Erledigt
DressyPear4 (2021-07-05 20:02:52+00:00): Olá, não adicione nome da via no nome da casa
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 07:51:36+00:00): Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag?
srderang (2021-07-02 12:44:50+00:00): Hi SafetyIng,
Thanks for checking my edits. I have added service=driveway tag as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107311585) with suggested modifications.
Regards, 
srderang.
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 07:52:27+00:00): Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag?
peddil (2021-07-02 15:53:01+00:00): Hi, 
I have not added service=driveway, as the segment leads to multiple entities. Thanks for the feedback, I have added service=driveway as suggested. Please find the changeset  107319929 with modifications. Regards,
peddil.
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 07:55:53+00:00): Heißen die Gebäude so, oder sind das eigentlich Firmen, die dort sitzen?
dive (2021-07-02 08:34:13+00:00): eigentlich haben die Gebäude keinen Eigennamen denke ich , sie werden nach den ortsüblich  Firmen darin so benannt
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 09:20:09+00:00): Naja, dann sind diese Firmen selbst einzutragen. Das Name-Tag ist nur für Eigennamen der Gebäude.

Z.B. In einer Schule das Haus 1 bekommt name=Haus 1 usw.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:57:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
Geim (2021-07-08 06:32:16+00:00): Hoi martiensch, hier nog een los eindje (weg zonder tags): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/960093652
Was je daar nog wat mee van plan?

Gr. Geim.
martiensch (2021-07-08 06:44:13+00:00): Hoi Geim,

Daar ontbrak een natural=tree_row, die ben ik vergeten.
Dank voor het doorgeven!

Groeten,

Martien
Alexmol (2021-07-03 21:43:44+00:00): Os detalhes do posto de carregamento estão errados. Porque apagou o existente que estava certo ?
Refl_ex (2021-07-03 11:17:32+00:00): Добрый день. Вы точно уверены, что эти участки дорог открыты для общего пользования?
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 07:53:13+00:00): Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag?
peddil (2021-07-02 15:50:38+00:00): Hi Safetying, 
Apologies for the misinterpretation of the road class here. I have now changed the classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset ( 107319829) with modifications. 
Good day!
pio2_122 (2021-07-01 18:55:38+00:00): Why are you duplicating the railway line number in the name tag when it is already correctly added to the ref tag?
Tavi Alexandre (2021-07-02 10:51:31+00:00): Because it should appear on the map. At least it's so in other parts of Poland.
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 08:00:40+00:00): Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag?
srderang (2021-07-02 12:46:12+00:00): Hi Safetying,
Apologies for the misinterpretation of the road class here. I have now added service=driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107311652) with modifications.
Regards,
srderang.
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 08:01:05+00:00): Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag?
srderang (2021-07-02 12:49:07+00:00): Hello SafetyIng,
I have now changed the highway tag to driveway as suggested. Thanks for the feedback. Please find the changeset (107311797) with suggested modifications. Good day! 
Regards,
srderang.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-04 16:58:51+00:00): Hello,
Please use meaningful changeset comments.  "Changes" is not a good changeset comment, nor is "errors fixed".  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information.
Best Regards,
Andy
limes11 (2021-07-01 17:40:11+00:00): Hallo,

gibt es hier Änderungen am Wegeplan? Diese Wege sind eigentlich seit Jahren nicht zu betreten und im Plan, der überall im 7Gebirge aushängt, nicht einmal verzeichnet.

VG, Limes
h1bakusha (2021-07-01 18:09:00+00:00): In dem Teilgebiet Ennert gilt die Wegeplan Regelung des 7G halt nicht, sondern der  Landschaftsplan Ennert.

Der sieht halt kein Verbot sondern lediglich Gebote vor. 3m Regelung für Fahrräder z. B.

https://www.bonn.de/medien-global/amt-67/Landschaftsplan_Ennert_Festsetzungen.pdf
limes11 (2021-07-01 19:45:53+00:00): Interessant. Die großen Wanderkarten, die überall im 7G hängen, beinhalten auch das Teilgebiet Ennert und sprechen ein generelles Betretungsverbot für nicht verzeichnete Wege aus. Passt nicht zusammen.
h1bakusha (2021-07-01 19:59:27+00:00): Es ist aber eben nicht der gesamte Ennert Teil des NSG Siebengebirge.

http://www.bezreg-koeln.nrw.de/brk_internet/amtsblatt/2012/21_2012_03.pdf
limes11 (2021-07-01 20:11:58+00:00): Das is klar - die Wanderkarten beinhalten aber *beide* NSGs, das große im Rhein-Sieg-Kreis SU-001K2 und das Teilgebiet Ennert BN-001K1.
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 08:01:51+00:00): Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag?
srderang (2021-07-02 12:47:31+00:00): Hi, 
I have not added service=driveway, as the segment leads to multiple entities. Thanks for the feedback, I have added service=driveway as suggested. Please find the changeset(107311725) with modifications. Regards,
srderang.
tux67 (2021-07-01 17:08:16+00:00): Die Gartennummern sind aus der angegebenen Quelle nicht ersichtlich.
Bei OSM sollten die genutzen Quellen offen, lizenzkompatibel und für alle anderen Mapper nachvollziehbar sein.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#.C3.9Cberpr.C3.BCfbarkeit
Wir benötigen eine offizielle Freigabe von der Quelle oder aber eine Webseite auf der diese Daten auf Basis einer OSM kompatiblen Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt werden.
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms#Rights_Granted

Beispiel für Dienste auf die diese Anforderungen Zutreffen:
https://www.bezreg-koeln.nrw.de/brk_internet/geobasis/opendata/index.html
Das Namensfeld ist hier nicht entsprechend der Wikikonvention genutzt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
"ref" wäre hier wahrscheinlich passend.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107262771
gasdriver_de (2021-07-01 20:04:53+00:00): Hallo,

ich war beruflich vor Ort und habe die Gartennummer hinzugefügt. Es handelt sich um Häuser jene offiziell als Erstwohnsitz, ganzjährig bewohnt werden.
tux67 (2021-07-01 20:39:47+00:00): Ok, dann gehört die Gebäude Nummer aber nicht in das Name Feld.
SafetyIng (2021-07-02 08:02:00+00:00): Hey, did you forget the driveway-tag?
srderang (2021-07-02 12:51:57+00:00): Hi Safetying,
Apologies for the misinterpretation of the road class here. I have now changed the classification to driveway as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset (107311913) with modifications. Good day!
Regards,
srderang.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
GoodClover (2021-07-08 13:20:32+00:00): By this do you mean you aligned to Bing aerial imagery with no offset, or that you used Bing to trace from and aligned the road from some other source?
Diana Soldatkina (2021-07-08 17:45:47+00:00): Hello! Thank you for paying attention to this case. As a part of ongoing work to improve the quality of OpenStreetMap Mapbox collect anonymous data and device location to continuously update data. We need this to improve routing. Using this data, we find problem areas on the map and fix them. In this case, we found that according to telemetry data, the geometry of the road on the map is displayed slightly incorrectly. Therefore, after the offset of Bing aerial imagery, the road was corrected by us.
GoodClover (2021-07-09 11:50:04+00:00): 👍
tastrax (2021-07-10 01:15:43+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
isabellasr (2021-07-01 14:15:44+00:00): sorry wrong link : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dchimney
Leo Slager (2021-07-01 21:41:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
iWowik (2021-07-04 04:17:02+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Выполняйте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании дорог
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать

Пример вашей ошибки 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470312715/history
ovruni (2021-07-01 15:24:23+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. El uso de la etiqueta de nombre se encuentra destinada solamente para los objetos que tienen un nombre en particular, no para agregar descripciones. [0]
Procedo a retirar todos los nombres que ha agregado.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
GinaroZ (2021-07-01 21:28:22+00:00): The preset list is non-exhaustive and shipwrecks are more common :)
Going by the photo here: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2083350 I've changed it to a memorial plaque. Not sure if needs a separate historic=aircraft_wreck
marczoutendijk (2023-02-11 16:20:21+00:00): surface=path??
What is that?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
Mathias_ADAV (2023-02-13 08:39:46+00:00): this is a mistake ;) Thanks for your vigilance
ivanbranco (2021-10-16 17:44:39+00:00): Hi Lillestryom, the coffe name is only "C", while the turkey name is "Cartoon Lab. Coffee", I suppose it's a typo?
lillestryom (2021-11-12 17:09:51+00:00): Yes, that's a typo. I couldn't find how to edit an added point.
ivanbranco (2021-11-12 17:16:05+00:00): Thanks for the reply! Don't worry, I'm gonna edit it for you :)
mueschel (2021-07-03 14:21:42+00:00): Hi,
the tag 'measures' is not used in any other place. What does it mean?
Futur3r (2021-07-01 18:54:54+00:00): Salut,

je t'ais déjà dit que les ref des sorties ne se tag pas comme ça !!!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107217080

Merci de te référer au wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction

Et est ce que tu peux mettre des commentaires de changesets plus précis.

Merci
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107267880
reenas (2021-07-06 05:14:42+00:00): Hi Chybcorp, I have removed invalid turn restrictions. Kindly check with r12907404, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107469622. Thank You.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107268063
chybcorp (2021-07-29 06:42:37+00:00): ok, looks like there was a mistake in my edit
HurricaneGator (2021-07-01 15:54:08+00:00): Correction: The correct imagery source is "Maxar Premium (4.38; 0.00)"
HurricaneGator (2021-07-01 15:54:22+00:00): "Maxar Premium (4.38; 0.00), Strava"
ezekielf (2021-07-01 19:23:46+00:00): Hi A Hall,
Thanks for your work improving the map in Vermont.   I saw your changeset comment and was just wondering what the incorrect automated edits you noticed where.   Looks like this changeset mostly deleted some address nodes and copied the tags over to a nodes on the corresponding building outlines.  Also if ever need to get in touch with other Vermont mappers join us in the #local-vermont channel on the OSM US Slack https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107268939
A Hall (2021-07-01 19:57:39+00:00): Hi ezekleif! Thanks for reaching out. This is my neighborhood, and I had gone and traced out a number of buildings, added addresses, etc. It looks like 'jared' (although I could be mistaken), had recently used some tools via Microsoft's building footprints and the National Address Database to enhance data in the area (something I admit is beyond my expertise. Since I had already made edits, these came in as duplicates or undoing corrected data. I connected the NAD points to the existing polygon structures to avoid the double address notation on the map. Also, a building, which had been torn down years ago (8+) was added back to the map, despite not showing in the satellite imagery. In these cases I consider these to be errors, since they used database data to efficiently, but not entirely accurately, edit the map. I focus the majority on my edits on personal knowledge of the areas I explore.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107268939
ezekielf (2021-07-02 01:18:24+00:00): Oh yes, jared is another VT based mapper I've chatted with on Slack.  They've been adding addresses and buildings all over the state with the RapiD editor (an iD fork with access to external data sets).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jared
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RapiD

I was worried there was some larger automated editing going on that I should be aware of.  From what I've seen these changes seem to be in small batches and getting verified against aerial imagery.  Obviously that can be out of date though, and I'm sure your on the ground knowledge of the area is better!

Thanks, for the reply.  Always good to make contact with another VT mapper.
jared (2021-07-02 01:34:15+00:00): Hi A Hall!  Thanks for raising your concern and glad to know of another mapper in the Upper Valley.

I've been adding addresses around VT.  So far, everything has been manual in batches of ~50 using the RapID editor.  As ezekielf mentioned, I use whatever seems like the newest aerial imagery available, but those are definitely sometimes years old.  
I've also been trying to conflate (combine) address points that I'm adding with building footprints.  In my experience, it usually does a decent job of adding whatever is missing. But the interface doesn't always make it super clear, so I may have made an error.  I'll try to have a closer look at the changeset, but if you can provide any specific examples, I'd like to check them out so I don't make the mistake elsewhere.
Thanks again. jared
jared (2021-07-02 02:19:41+00:00): I took a look at the changeset.  

It looks like the building that no longer exists is 2651 Academy Rd. Thanks for catching this.  It does still show up in the Esri World Imagery (Clarity) background. 

It looks like 2682 Academy Rd may have already had an address added to the building footprint.  So I should not have added the address point/node from the National Address Database. 

It doesn't look to me that any of the other addresses existed before I added them. I added this batch as nodes and placed them over the building location (sometimes with an existing building footprint, sometimes no footprint).  It is my understanding that adding addresses as nodes that are over a building footprint is a common and accepted method.  (In cases where the building only has one address, it also okay to conflate them into one (the address is part of the footprint/way, but it is an extra step that I'm thinking I may be able to automate at a later stage.)

I'm not sure what tool you used to combine the address with the building way, but it looks like it made the address part of one of the nodes in the building way.  I haven't seen this method before.  I'm not sure if it is accepted or common, but it seems "cleaner" to make the address tags part of the way (whole footprint) rather than a single node.

The way I combine them is in the ID editor, I select both the building footprint and the address point (shift-click to get both selected).  Then I type the "c" shortcut and that combines them together.

For consistency, I'd suggest we do this with the addresses in this changeset.

Let me know if I missed anything, or you have any questions.

Thanks again for your help with mapping VT. Jared
A Hall (2021-07-02 16:23:42+00:00): Thank you both for the feedback. I meant no offense in the description of my change set, simply my full understanding and reasoning for my edits. I had connected the address as a node per one of the wiki's I read, and was unable to figure out how to combine points and shapes. I agree, your solution is much better. I've cleaned up the 'work' I did there and will plan to use that strategy moving forward. Also, thank you for sharing the tools which do make adding a lot of these details a lot easier! It probably makes sense for jared to continue his work there, as he likely has a good system to cover the state and if I join in piecemeal in my neighborhood I'll probably interrupt it. 

Thanks for the extra guidance and invite to the slack. I've been editing in a vacuum and the tips and tricks are great.
ravali_78 (2021-07-02 03:41:36+00:00): Hi DO Antoine,
I have fixed the bridge configuration.Kindly check with way 955691767,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107286053.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107268983
DO Antoine (2021-07-02 06:34:14+00:00): Hi ravali_78,
I have checked and corrected the bridge.
Have a nice day!
muzirian (2021-11-21 09:52:39+00:00): roads you added doesnt look like they exist, please recheck
Johnbo (2023-08-31 09:35:42+00:00): Hola Adrián.

En este conjunto de cambios eliminaste el nombre de la calle Tablerón para ponerle Doctor Sagaz Zubelzu, que no es el nombre oficial, sino a quién está dedicada la calle.

Te pido por favor que si editas en zonas que no conoces localmente, te asegures antes de realizar un cambio de este calado.
multimodaal (2021-10-14 18:54:46+00:00): Hoi, je hebt in deze changeset een aantal wegen die ik in OSM had afgesloten vanwege de stormschade bij Leersum (door ze op disused:path) te zetten weer geopend. Zie bijv. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/227532321

Ik  ben hier gister langsgeweest en deze paden zijn bepaald nog niet hersteld of toegankelijk, het is nog maar de vraag of deze paden terugkomen, zoals je ook op de foto in onderstaande link kan zien. Het Uterchtpad is verder ook verlegd van verdwenen paden naar het -al wel geopende fietspad. 

Zet je zelf deze paden weer terug op disused of zal ik dat doen? 

Groet!

 Zie ter illustratie foto van gister: https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipMOqNhDiLbRdrF9qQTI8CrgvJxwn5T9JIViS93qNNBN8LDZ2dgeKSlkm3oGdgLKuA?key=SnAybjVLLUtuVzFBNDFzRHRhbDE3WjJJZXAzVHVB
Gatalin (2021-10-15 07:37:48+00:00): Hoi,

Ik weet niet wat daar gebeurd is, want ik heb niet bewust aan de access gezeten, aangezien ik het gebied verder niet ken. Het was voor mij alleen duidelijk dat het Utrechtpad een andere route had dan toen in OSM stond.

Aangezien jij beter bekend bent daar, pas vooral aan wat je weet dat niet open is.
multimodaal (2021-10-16 09:36:12+00:00): Hoi, dank voor je reactie, ik heb het hersteld. 

Het openstellen was in deze changeset gebeurd door disused:highway=path te wijzigen in highway=path

Tip: als je tags ziet die vreemd overkomen zoals deze, dan is het voordat je iets wijzigt goed om in de geschiedenis te kijken in welke changeset ze zijn toegevoegd en met welk commentaar (Ctrl-h in JOSM).  zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_remove_tags_that_you_don.27t_understand   

Als de changeset comment  geen uitsluitsel geef tdan kan je ook contact opnemen met de mapper die de "vreemde" tag heef toegevoegd. Maar om je medemapper  onnodige moeite te besparen is het wel erg fijn als er informatieve/specifieke changeset comments worden meegegeven ipv heel erg algemene als ("zaken toegevoegd  / verwijderd")  ;-) 

Zie ook  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments

Groet!
RicoElectrico (2021-07-05 16:04:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2742039
francians (2021-07-01 18:31:06+00:00): Ciao,

grazie per i contributi!

Al posto del name, che ne dici di ruins=yes?

Vedi la wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ruins

Francesco
Bierphysik (2022-07-26 14:06:30+00:00): Hi. Du hast für https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37838374 eine width=1.5 eingetragen. Bist Du Dir da sicher? Wenn ich das anhand der Satellitenbilder vermesse lande ich da eher bei width=2.5 bis width=3.
erja (2022-07-26 15:26:14+00:00): Na ja, ich hatte kein Massband dabei. Aber das Wegelchen da ist verdammt schmal. Mit einem 2 mtr. breiten Kfz kommt man nicht durch. Einsfuffzig ist realistisch für die Praxis.
Bierphysik (2022-07-26 17:38:08+00:00): Kann es dann sein, dass demnach width=1.5m nicht auf dem kompletten highway=residential gilt? wenn ja, wäre das imho aufzuteilen damit routing engines wissen bis wohin ein Auto fahrne kann :)
erja (2022-07-26 20:15:21+00:00): Yeppp, stimmt. Dieser Weg müsste mehrfach gestückkelt werden. Für die Praxis sind die schmalsten Stellen maßgeblich. 
Für Kleinwagen (Anwohner) bedingt möglich, für Lieferwagen (AMAZON & Co) definitiv nicht fahrbar.
Bierphysik (2022-07-27 12:33:54+00:00): Kannst Du das machen? Wegen Ortskenntnissen?
erja (2022-07-27 13:07:48+00:00): Mittelfristig ja. Nach dem Urlaub.