piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 05:56:55+00:00): www.learnosm.org/es/

Estan colocando zonas Residenciales sobre posibles Lotes, LO QUE ES INCORRECTO, por favor solo coloquen las construcciones Fisicas tag: building=yes o building=house, No coloquen areas como landuse=residencial porque ese NO es el cometido de esa etiqueta y borraremos todas las ediciones que hagan. Te envie un correo por favor leelo. Gracias
JJ
jgon6 (2020-03-20 02:08:44+00:00): there unfortunately aren't agreed upon tags for something like this. It actually looks like leisure=playground might be the closest right now.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/scaled_down_streets_that_may_be_used_for_traffic_safety_education_or_as_a_type_of_a_playground
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82409750
Allison P (2020-04-17 14:53:47+00:00): I'm not completely certain, but I feel like at least some of these aren't culverts and instead they have a bridge going over them. It's hard to define with canals.
user_5359 (2020-03-21 15:05:31+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag LINE=yes on the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445344929 ?
BikeRoad (2020-03-22 02:31:43+00:00): Forget to remove that key tag. Corrected
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 04:45:58+00:00): Estan colocando zonas Residenciales sobre posibles Lotes, LO QUE ES INCORRECTO, por favor solo coloquen las construcciones Fisicas tag: building=yes o building=house, No coloquen areas como landuse=residencial porque ese NO es el cometido de esa etiqueta y borraremos todas las ediciones que hagan. Te envie un correo por favor leelo. Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 05:57:41+00:00): leer www.learnosm.org/es/
stillhart (2026-05-25 20:32:14+00:00): Kurze Frage, weisst du ob das tatsächlich ein tesla supercharger ist? Ich glaube das ist wenn überhaupt ein Tesla Destination Charger
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6642996759/history
Laci (2026-05-25 22:40:26+00:00): Nein, keine Ahnung, sorry.
pravallg (2020-03-20 01:39:30+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
Pravallika
shreeush (2020-03-23 09:58:03+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 04:46:33+00:00): Estan colocando zonas Residenciales sobre posibles Lotes, LO QUE ES INCORRECTO, por favor solo coloquen las construcciones Fisicas tag: building=yes o building=house, No coloquen areas como landuse=residencial porque ese NO es el cometido de esa etiqueta y borraremos todas las ediciones que hagan. Te envie un correo por favor leelo. Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 05:58:25+00:00): leer www.learnosm.org/es/
Zalitoar (2022-09-20 22:05:34+00:00): Gracias por colaborar agregando datos  @c_rudiander. Para futuras ediciones tené en cuenta por favor que en la etiqueta name de las edificaciones debe asignarse como valor un nombre real y no "casa", "galpón" o "varios". Ante dudas te recomiendo visitar las mejores prácticas de mapeo en nuestra Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas
Saludos!
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 05:57:58+00:00): www.learnosm.org/es/

Estan colocando zonas Residenciales sobre posibles Lotes, LO QUE ES INCORRECTO, por favor solo coloquen las construcciones Fisicas tag: building=yes o building=house, No coloquen areas como landuse=residencial porque ese NO es el cometido de esa etiqueta y borraremos todas las ediciones que hagan. Te envie un correo por favor leelo. Gracias
JJ
ralley (2020-03-20 03:00:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits - from the aerial imagery I believe what you have tagged here is a driveway and not a residential road.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82410666
ralley (2020-03-20 08:03:29+00:00): I've fixed this
shreeush (2020-03-23 09:58:17+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 09:58:28+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:00:10+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:01:17+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
mwakram (2020-03-20 02:11:29+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
mwakram
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:01:10+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:01:02+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 05:58:50+00:00): www.learnosm.org/es/

Estan colocando zonas Residenciales sobre posibles Lotes, LO QUE ES INCORRECTO, por favor solo coloquen las construcciones Fisicas tag: building=yes o building=house, No coloquen areas como landuse=residencial porque ese NO es el cometido de esa etiqueta y borraremos todas las ediciones que hagan. Te envie un correo por favor leelo. Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 05:59:14+00:00): www.learnosm.org/es/

Estan colocando zonas Residenciales sobre posibles Lotes, LO QUE ES INCORRECTO, por favor solo coloquen las construcciones Fisicas tag: building=yes o building=house, No coloquen areas como landuse=residencial porque ese NO es el cometido de esa etiqueta y borraremos todas las ediciones que hagan. Te envie un correo por favor leelo. Gracias
JJ
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:00:56+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
kevmath (2020-03-20 02:43:05+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
kevmath
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:00:49+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:00:42+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
mwakram (2020-03-20 03:05:48+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
mwakram
FreedSky (2021-02-22 05:41:38+00:00): 破坏了一大堆关系啊
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:00:22+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-20 06:28:12+00:00): Hi pwhite119, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting more than 300 mapped buildings? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious-change-viz?c=82412295

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ppjj Imports+NHD (2020-03-20 12:34:37+00:00): Hi, most of these buildings that were deleted were created by me on my other account, pwhite119. All the buildings that were deleted (many of which were inaccurate) were replaced.
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-21 09:29:05+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

So why did you previously import inaccurate buildings?
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:02:40+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:02:47+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
mwakram (2020-03-20 03:18:50+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
mwakram
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:02:53+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
boopington (2020-05-24 21:17:38+00:00): unless you literally drove on this road, dont tag it as open
swathiku (2020-05-25 06:47:36+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect edit, I missed to check the notes and made changes as per the Bing aerial imagery which is of 2019. Will ensure not to repeat such errors again. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
swathiku
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:02:58+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:03:05+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
pandypr (2020-03-20 04:13:37+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
Pandypr
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 04:46:54+00:00): Estan colocando zonas Residenciales sobre posibles Lotes, LO QUE ES INCORRECTO, por favor solo coloquen las construcciones Fisicas tag: building=yes o building=house, No coloquen areas como landuse=residencial porque ese NO es el cometido de esa etiqueta y borraremos todas las ediciones que hagan. Te envie un correo por favor leelo. Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 05:59:57+00:00): favor leer www.learnosm.org/es/
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:03:10+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
Adamant1 (2020-03-25 03:37:13+00:00): Hi there. I noticed in this changeset that you changed Churn Creek from a river to a stream. According to the Wiki a stream is something an able bodied person can jump across. Which being someone who has lived along the Churn Creek my whole life I know from personal experience you can't do when it has water flowing in it. 

While I know different people have different definitions of things, I think the best route is to go by the wiki's definition so there isn't arguing and editing warring over difference in personal opinions of how things should be mapped. So, I'm going to change this back to a river. I'd appreciate it if you respected the same tagging method for the other "streams" I have tagged as rivers in the area,  Including ones further down south. 

Thanks, 

Adamant1
mwakram (2020-03-20 04:26:02+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
mwakram
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:03:16+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:03:22+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:03:27+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
Supaplex (2020-03-20 04:46:22+00:00): 估嶺街5巷打錯字了
應該是牯嶺街
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82414295
yellowsoar (2020-03-20 11:54:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82430402
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82414295
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 06:00:12+00:00): www.learnosm.org/es/

Estan colocando zonas Residenciales sobre posibles Lotes, LO QUE ES INCORRECTO, por favor solo coloquen las construcciones Fisicas tag: building=yes o building=house, No coloquen areas como landuse=residencial porque ese NO es el cometido de esa etiqueta y borraremos todas las ediciones que hagan. Te envie un correo por favor leelo. Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2020-03-20 06:00:27+00:00): www.learnosm.org/es/

Estan colocando zonas Residenciales sobre posibles Lotes, LO QUE ES INCORRECTO, por favor solo coloquen las construcciones Fisicas tag: building=yes o building=house, No coloquen areas como landuse=residencial porque ese NO es el cometido de esa etiqueta y borraremos todas las ediciones que hagan. Te envie un correo por favor leelo. Gracias
JJ
Riyadi IRM-RV (2021-06-22 02:49:39+00:00): halo , DnieperBasin
trust you doing great. i found crosing 
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/782895436

i deleted this polygon water due found crossing issue. i think area appropriate for water/waterway/river which have wide geometry. if its small should be present in way enough https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=riverbank
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater

let me know if any an update data. 
. thank you happy mapping
DnieperBasin (2021-06-23 16:00:55+00:00): Hi Riyadi IRM-ED, Thank you for updating the area by removing the riverbank polygon. Happy Mapping!
mwakram (2020-03-20 04:43:45+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
mwakram
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:03:32+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:04:10+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
SomeoneElse (2020-03-23 10:30:20+00:00): Hello shreeush,
It's useful to say "These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections", but please add it to the changeset comment rather than as the first item in a discussion on every single changeset you add.
Please also add details of the actual source - you're using data from Facebook, but what source data did they use and what algorithm did they use to detect roads?  How do you know what road class to choose?  How do you know what is a false positive?
Best Regards,
Andy
jguthula (2020-03-23 11:27:16+00:00): Hi Andy,

Thanks for looking into this edit. Looks like the editor is blocked from responding, so I am posting on her behalf. She was supposed to add commented information as a part of changeset notes, but missed it from her end by mistake in 94 changesets, so added it as a comment to give a better clarity to OSM community. I have communicated her mistake and she agreed to not repeat this mistake in future. Also, do let me know if there is a better way to edit changeset notes once added to OSM. We downloaded the FB detections from the link mentioned in FB wiki and just used it as a source to manually draw the road. So the road classification given to these roads are as per her understanding on OSM highway classification wiki. Do let me know if she interpreted the road classification wrongly, happy to get it corrected immediately.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
SomeoneElse (2020-03-23 11:38:59+00:00): For the avoidance of doubt, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3583 is just "Active until the user logs in".  If they log in to OSM they'll see the message and will be able to continue as normal.

You may not be doing this, but I'll mention it just in case:
Please don't use blindly use FB's detected roads as things that you can add to OSM.  They are a suggestion, nothing more - we've seen lots of examples of false positives.  The decision to add a road (and what sort of road to add) is down to the mapper themselves, and they ought to be able to respond how and why they did it (based on local survey, imagery, whatever).
I await the response to my original questions from shreeush.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
shreeush (2020-03-23 13:52:27+00:00): Yes Andy, the FB's detections are just being used as a suggestion, but the roads are actually being manually drawn using satellite imagery. Since I was unable to comment earlier, I requested Jothirnadh to respond but I do agree to your point and will make sure to not repeat such mistake in future.
Regards,
shreeush
SomeoneElse (2020-03-23 14:08:10+00:00): Thanks
jguthula (2020-03-23 14:25:31+00:00): Hi Andy,

I have a small query. While we are trying to make sure all our editors add appropriate changeset notes, in case if they miss appropriate note like this case, can we ask them to add a comment or is it not required?

Regards,
Jothirnadh
SomeoneElse (2020-03-29 10:34:38+00:00): @Jothirnadh Adding changeset discussion comments where something has been missed by accident is perfectly OK - the problem here was that it wasn't obvious that that was what was happening - it looked like they were just being added as an extra comment to every changeset.  A bit more information would have helped - something like "I forgot to add this to the changeset comment, so here it is in the discussion" or similar.
Best Regards,
Andy
jguthula (2020-03-31 07:32:16+00:00): Sure Andy, thanks for your suggestion. I will pass on this information to our editing team and get this sorted.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82414726
vkanduku (2020-03-20 05:01:38+00:00): Added Driveway #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
vkanduku (2020-03-20 05:06:51+00:00): Added Driveway #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:04:16+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:04:23+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
azsr (2020-04-21 15:44:18+00:00): Hey, thanks for contributing. I think the service roads that you added near Oakland Beach Elementary School should not be tagged as "access=private", since they are accessible by the general public. I have changed the tags to "access=permissive" in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83890036
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82415421
sreejam (2020-04-22 10:36:12+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your response. I've added the access tag as private considering that these roads are built and maintained by the school. If we give the access tag as permissive, I'm assuming it would be a safety issue for students. To better understand this, could you help me with the general traffic flows through these roads?
Regards,
sreejam
azsr (2020-04-22 18:12:56+00:00): Yeah, now that I think about it, "access=permissive" probably isn't the best tag. My reasoning is based on the fact that Oakland Beach is a public/state school, so public access is expected as events may be held there. Also, the service roads provide access/parking space for the playground and fields during non-school periods.
I guess a better way to tag this might be "access=destination" or more narrowly as "access=customers"? But I think that "access=private" is too restrictive given that it is a public space, so there is no individual permissions that a person needs in order to use these roads. It's more of a situation where you implicitly have access to the school area unless you are explicitly banned for disruption &c, which I feel is the case for most public schools in Rhode Island. What do you think?
Thanks,
azsr
sreejam (2020-04-23 09:58:02+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. While I agree with you on "destination" tag fitting best in the scenario but I see that doesn't really justify the edit as per the OSM Wiki information. As the situation is ambiguous here, should we look at adding the "unknown" tag as access? As adding any other tag might confuse other users.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Regards,
sreejam
azsr (2020-04-24 16:25:15+00:00): Hey,
I'm not sure if the "service roads" we're talking about are even driveable in the first place. Looking at the RIGIS 2019 imagery (http://www.rigis.org/pages/2019-spring-imagery) the area that we're looking at seems to be a blacktop play area for the school.

(sorry for the long links. I'll be using numbers and putting the links at the bottom of the comment)
[1] seems to show four foursquare courts in the blacktop area.
[2] If you look closely near the corner of the building, there seems to be a fence/gate blocking access to the blacktop area.
[3] Dumpsters block the eastern "service" road. You can also see this on Bing [4].

Now, I'm not sure if we can use RIGIS imagery as a source for OSM because the imagery databases are licensed under CC-BY 4.0. I'm going to send an email to the relevant persons asking for special permission. But I think this is enough evidence to show that this is not an actual service road. 

Thanks,
azsr

Links:
[1] https://maps.edc.uri.edu/rigis/services/IMG/RI_201904_RGB_3in_web/ImageServer/WMSServer?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=0&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG:3857&WIDTH=512&HEIGHT=512&BBOX=-7948228.4687892,5115930.9444392,-7948152.0317642,5116007.3814642
[2] https://maps.edc.uri.edu/rigis/services/IMG/RI_201904_RGB_3in_web/ImageServer/WMSServer?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=0&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG:3857&WIDTH=512&HEIGHT=512&BBOX=-7948304.9058142,5115930.9444392,-7948228.4687892,5116007.3814642
[3] https://maps.edc.uri.edu/rigis/services/IMG/RI_201904_RGB_3in_web/ImageServer/WMSServer?FORMAT=image/png&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.1.1&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=0&STYLES=&SRS=EPSG:3857&WIDTH=512&HEIGHT=512&BBOX=-7948228.4687892,5115854.5074142,-7948152.0317642,5115930.9444392
[4] https://ecn.t1.tiles.virtualearth.net/tiles/a03023323021310122201.jpeg?g=8467

p.s. thanks for keeping up with this :)
sreejam (2020-04-27 09:37:33+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for the detailed explanation of the area. I've corrected the roads as per your suggestion under the changeset (# 84187924,84187484). Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
sreejam
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-20 06:31:00+00:00): Hi VLD230, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped ways or paths? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious-change-viz?c=82415532

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
VLD230 (2020-03-20 18:36:50+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch,
Thank you for sharing the feedback and I apologize for the inconvenience. As I digitized the roads myself, my intention was definitely not to delete the roads. However, due to some technical glitch the data got accidentally deleted, I realized it right away and reverted the changes.