piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OpenWolf17 (2017-03-30 07:52:29+00:00): Nein, weder Schild noch Katastereintrag, sondern "Dorfname". Der Weg hat keinen offiziellen Namen. Vor meiner Korrektur war der Weg noch als Teil der Straße '"Untere Wiesenstraße" bezeichnet, was unzutreffend ist.
lg ulrich
tux67 (2017-03-23 21:04:39+00:00): Hallo OpenWolf17,
soll das eine dauerhafte Sperre sein?

Gruß
tux67
OpenWolf17 (2017-03-30 07:45:51+00:00): Ja,
die Sperrung ist dauerhaft, wenn auch nur durch große Betonpflanzenkübel.
tux67 (2017-03-30 19:17:46+00:00): Hi und danke für die Rückmeldung. In diesem Falle solltest du - zusätzlich zum Poller die beiden "toten" Enden der Stasse noch als Sackgasse markieren und ggr. andere Zutrittsrestriktionen auf diesen Stassenstücken eintragen. 
(Also das kleine Stück von Hauptstrasse in die Schulstrasse bis Poller und von der anderen Seite Kreuzung untere Stasse in die Schulstr. bis Poller.
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=250
Sonst schickt ein Routingservice dich trotz Poller immer noch da lang. 

Gruß
Stephan
Trambadeno (2017-03-23 10:44:48+00:00): Falscher Kommentar.
Richtig: Poi für real Markt gesetzt.
maraf24 (2017-04-01 09:21:18+00:00): Narysowałeś chodnik w budynku.
Zamist tego powinno to być oznaczone jako highway=corridor.
PerseP (2017-03-23 11:55:08+00:00): Deshago cambio porque lo que se hizo es dividir la partida del Tolls en dos y no encuentro referencias sobre ello
eggie (2017-03-23 12:15:52+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-08-20 04:50:21+00:00): Hi montyburns. I changed geometry  of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/482226634). Thankyou
acsd (2017-03-23 15:19:16+00:00): мфц обозначается:
office=government
government=public_service
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:office%3Dgovernment
maraf24 (2017-04-01 09:21:50+00:00): Co to za opisy zmian postaci "1" ?
1 co?
scruss (2017-03-31 00:05:25+00:00): hey, the bing imagery isn't very clear in this area (= where I live) so I wouldn't add ways unless it's totally clear
manuelab_telenav (2017-04-27 05:59:59+00:00): Hello, 
I'm not sure which ways are not visible enough on Bing imagery, but I will suppose you are reffering to way with id 281848415, and the fact that I added the oneway tag on it. If you look with attention, it is very clear from Bing that this is oneway. The orientation of the cars + the small width of the entrance&exit are clear signs that this can't be a both-ways road. 
If I didn't understand your comment correctly, please tell me exactly what you think is wrong in my edits here.
scruss (2017-04-27 14:04:10+00:00): Thanks, Manuela - that way is a drive-through for the Tim Hortons coffee shop. I've revised it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281848415

The way in question was this one - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274338467 - that you'd extended out to join up with the exit road. It stops at the NW corner, and the Bing imagery is too fuzzy to make this detail out
eggie (2017-03-23 12:03:31+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-23 12:08:12+00:00): Jetzt nicht mehr.. :)
manoharuss (2017-03-24 07:40:30+00:00): Hi Abderrahmane Benkhalifa,

These are way too many attractions, are you sure these are right?

Thanks,

Manohar
DaveF (2017-03-23 12:32:07+00:00): Hi
To check is this a new path as it doesn't show on Bing's aerial image?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482229818#map=19/51.44147/-2.57799

Is this 'park' really called 'Zone N'?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125097374

Cheers
DaveF
Simon Hobeck (2017-03-23 13:43:15+00:00): Hi,

Yes, the area is called "Zone N" - Its a strange name but is left over from when the area was demolished in the 1970s and then zoned for redevelopment.  You'll see another green area SE along the Wells Road, called "Zone A".

The path is across the grass through the area, rather than a concrete path. so it often blends with the surroundings - I can remove it if required.  It is only semi-formal....in that it gets mown but I guess someone could walk anywhere on the grass.
Simon
Владимир К (2017-03-23 11:36:30+00:00): эх, 4 подъезда у меня увёл :D
literan (2017-03-23 11:41:07+00:00): вернуть взад? :))
Владимир К (2017-03-23 11:45:11+00:00): нет, конечно :)
literan (2017-03-23 11:47:44+00:00): могу гораздо больше подъездов взамен предложить http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47094645#map=18/55.83437/37.30510&layers=N :))
wambacher (2017-03-23 16:10:26+00:00): hi, you killed all admin boundaries in that area. please fix it or i have to undo all your changes.
walter
dmgroom_ct (2017-03-23 16:46:12+00:00): If you look in deatil at my chnage you will note that the admin boiundaries remained unaffected by my changes.

You may be mitaking the problems which were caused by earlier edits by user Lola_Fox which also broke the coastline.

I split some ways and removed coastline tags from them in order to fix teh coastline, but made no cnages to the admin boundaries
wambacher (2017-03-23 17:31:07+00:00): but you agree, thart the admin boundaries are damaged, yes?

check pisa(6): http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/42338/#map=16/43.7842/10.2757

please: because you know the area better than me, try to fix it.
mavl (2017-10-08 10:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
Markus366 (2017-03-23 18:05:11+00:00): Hallo, und Willkommen bei osm.

Nach Bing sieht der Verlauf dieses Weges deutlich anders aus, als du ihn gezeichnet hast. Bist du sicher, dass der Weg tatsächlich so verläuft?

MfG Markus
Markus366 (2017-04-11 12:08:37+00:00): Leider hast du dich noch nicht gemeldet. Ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht da ich sie für falsch ansehe.
Stereo (2017-03-23 14:57:21+00:00): Danke!
abDoug (2017-04-04 13:59:18+00:00): wrong name on Panorama Hills Rise - putting wrong name on road is worse than it having no name!
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
tux67 (2017-03-24 16:53:55+00:00): Hallo OSMapMax,

willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithilfst die Kartendaten zu verbessern. 
Eine Anmerkung zu deinen Änderungssätzen: 

Bitte verwende immer aussagefähige Kommentare:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden: 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 
Gruß 
Stephan (tux67)
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf 
Wichtig auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
Владимир К (2017-03-24 07:59:01+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вы тут кучу дублей наделали, когда повесили школы и сады на здания, хотя вокруг них уже отмечена территория. Вот тут описано как надо делать.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Вы будете всё это исправлять?
literan (2017-03-24 08:03:55+00:00): Я все исправляю, но в следующий раз, asnastasia, в случае появления дублей придется откатить вашу правку, если вы не будете реагировать на справедливые замечания
LucGommans (2021-06-26 16:41:29+00:00): Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316126258 and many others - "fixme=check location" Why? For what? Positioning? House number? Something else?
Geofreund1 (2021-06-27 09:56:15+00:00): check location means: is this what has been mapped here at the right locaction. On the other hand it is quite some time ago that this item has been worked on . If you find the fixme note not appropriate you might freely delete it.
LucGommans (2021-06-27 10:09:40+00:00): Okay so I assume that means coordinates and not other tags like house numbers. Thanks for responding, then I know I can safely remove these after checking the feature's position and outline :)
andygol (2017-03-23 22:14:40+00:00): Ваш опис до цього та до попередніх наборів змін не відповідає тому, що ви додаєте. Будь ласка, робить відповідні описи до ваших правок - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Good_changeset_comments
Harald Hartmann (2017-03-30 07:46:42+00:00): Test
tux67 (2017-03-23 20:43:24+00:00): Hallo Baumtopf,

was heisst denn "Test" .. OSM daten sind Produktiv. Kannst du bitte aussagefähige Changeset Kommentare machen und nur "echte" Änderungen mappen.

Gruß
tux67
ToniE (2017-03-23 14:12:16+00:00): Hello Cyclofunnya,

I guess, the hotel node 4750883486, "stop river cruise" is not really a building but rather a hotel-ship which stops here from time to time.
I will therefore delete this one, it's not a permanent amenity.
Regards
Toni
DoDoMR (2017-03-23 16:33:57+00:00): Bist Du Dir sicher, dass dieser Kreisverkehr tatsächlich innen eine Grasfläche hat?! M.W. ist dieser Kreisel lediglich "geteert".
jojopi (2017-03-24 14:48:16+00:00): Ja, der Kreisel ist endausgebaut worden und ist in der Mitte jetzt begrünt. Die mobilen Einfassungen bilden jetzt den Kreisel auf der Kreuzung Steinweg/Kasseler Strasse/Frankfurter Strasse. Dieser ist in Der Mitte daher geteert.
mavl (2017-10-08 10:16:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52725038 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47012108].
Nakaner (2017-04-03 20:25:21+00:00): Hallo Tiwi,

was für gute Vermessungsinstrumente hast du denn für deine "survey" verwendet, die dazu führen, dass du die Gebäude in Klein Dratow neben ihrer Lage im Bing-Luftbild eingetragen hast?

Viele Grüße

Michael
abDoug (2017-04-02 18:03:00+00:00): area tagged as water park - this is not a water park according to OSM documentation
demon_box (2017-03-24 21:19:48+00:00): ciao, bisognerebbe aggiungere office=association
prova a dare un'occhiata qui:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:office
grazie.
demon_box (2017-04-02 16:13:00+00:00): ciao la rastrelliera per biciclette non si mappa così:
amenity=shelter
name=Portabiciclette
ma così:
amenity=bicycle_parking
bicycle_parking=verona_rack
dai un'occhiata qui:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_parking
grazie
tux67 (2017-03-23 20:36:21+00:00): Hallo Jürgen Lobmüller, 
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithilfst die Kartendaten zu verbessern. 
Einige Anmerkungen zu deinem Änderungssatz: 
- ja du hattest recht, da war ein Poi mit der Volksbank doppelt - einmal als Punkt und einmal am Gebäude gemappt.
- allerdings ist jetzt die Bank weg, da nur der gelöschte Punkt das amenity=bank tag hatte. 
- dafür ist das ATM Flag immer noch 2x da - einmal am Gebäude und einmal als Punkt
Mein Vorschlag: Gib dem Gebäude noch ein amenity=bank aber nimm das atm tag dort weg und lass es als punkt stehen.

2 allgemeine Anmerungen:
- bitte benutze immer aussagefähige Changset Kommentare - Doppelt, wie hier läßt andere Mapper erstmal suchen was sich denn geändert haben könnte
- wenn du etwas löscht, schau dir an welche History die Elemente haben. Bei doppelten sollte das ältere erhalten bleiben.

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden: 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 
Gruß 
Stephan (tux67)
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf 
Wichtig auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
streckenkundler (2017-03-23 16:12:28+00:00): Hei,

bitte schreibe in deinen Changest-Kommentar mehr als "x". Schreibe z.B. Gebäude gezeichnet und/ oder Landuse ergänzt oder so. Bitte schreibe, das, was du gemacht hast... Damit beugst du Beschwerden  und zurücksetzen von Änderungen vor.

Im Übrigen ist dieser Edit Mist... du löscht Geometrien, um sie dann wieder neu zu erfassen. Das sorgt immer für Ärger... Dich achtest nicht die Arbeit anderer... Das was du dann produzierst ist ganz großer Mist... Gebäudegeobetrien werden so erfasst, wie sie zur Grundfläche auf der Erde passen und nicht nach Dachkante oder guter Laune.

Auch auf Kommentare nicht zu reagieren kommt ganz schlecht an...

Ich ziehe es in Erwägung, diesen Änderungssatz teilweise zurückzusetzen.

streckenkundler
oini (2017-03-24 09:55:38+00:00): Hey Stanley! Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I reverted this changeset as it had incorrect tagging scheme.
elgolfo (2017-04-23 19:34:11+00:00): in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48069997 revertiert
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
Polarbear (2017-05-01 22:13:06+00:00): Eine Kapelle existiert an der von dir gezeichneten Stelle und in der gezeichneten Geometrie weder auf Bing (2012) noch auf dem zum Vergleich herangezogenen DOP 2014 des Geoportals Brandenburg. 
Die Position des Friedhofs ist nach den Bilden unplausibel.
Polarbear (2017-05-01 22:14:56+00:00): Partial revert in 48319721: removal of fictive building
Correction of cemetery in 48319713
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:27:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-07 17:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48480631, 48480305 where the changeset comment is: Revert wbmstr edits after continued refusal to specify a source for large-scale renaming of churches, for losing information when updating existing objects, and generally ignoring helpful comments by other community members.
DaveF (2017-03-23 16:13:06+00:00): Hi Dan Welcome to OSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121677796/history

My understanding was Yammo is due to reopen. Have you heard differently?
dan_bath (2017-03-23 16:17:56+00:00): Hi Dave, yes Yammo is due to reopen, but it looks as though it was incorrectly added as a building. 66 Walcot Street is partitioned - Yammo and Languages United both lease parts of the building. My changes were making the address a commercial building, and the businesses nodes on it. I don't know if Yammo's details will still be valid, so I'll mention it to them so they know to enter their details when they reopen.
DaveF (2017-03-23 16:31:32+00:00): That's strange, I didn't realise they were the same property. Can you walk between them?
I think Yammo should still be included as a building in its own right, as to a map user they are two separate businesses even if they share the same house number. Are you the property manager?
dan_bath (2017-03-23 16:43:01+00:00): Yes, we share the same number - you can't walk between them, Yammo leases 1/2 of the ground and part at the back, we lease part ground and 2nd/3rd floors. On a 2D map it is difficult to plot, which is why I thought single building with two organisation nodes. Yammo should be on there - I've let the owner know about the changes so they can add it with any updated details.
DaveF (2017-03-23 17:08:48+00:00): I've tweaked them so they're both mapped as polygons & occupy the correct space.
dan_bath (2017-03-23 19:34:22+00:00): Thank you
Spanholz (2017-07-02 20:56:07+00:00): Very cool alignment here! Thanks for the work on West Virginia :)

Try the Strava Heatmaps
naoliv (2018-08-17 13:28:07+00:00): Luis, tudo bem?
Parece que você importou os prédios de algum outro local.
Você poderia nos informar qual é a fonte desses dados, por favor?
Felipe Alves (2017-03-24 16:10:12+00:00): Oi, Leo.

O que quis representar exatamente com essa linha?
Spanholz (2017-03-23 18:18:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

if you see footways, which are not connected to streets at the ends or when they intersect could you please connect them? Only then routing is possible. 
Thanks and Have fun mapping!
SomeoneElse (2017-03-23 16:21:32+00:00): Hello,
You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)
I'll delete it...
Best Regards,
Andy
alesarrett (2018-05-10 08:16:50+00:00): Hi, the trees in Palma de Mallorca have the tag "name" filled with "platanero". I think that should not be the place for that information, but instead the tag "species" with "species=es", see examples at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree
SomeoneElse (2018-05-12 12:04:53+00:00): @alesarrett - this mapper hasn't been active for a year.  If there's anything that needs fixing and you can fix it yourself, I'd do that.
If on the other hand there is anything that you need help with, drop the data working group an email via data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards, 
Andy (from the Data Working Group)
southglos (2017-03-23 22:33:18+00:00): Hi.  Why the change from "service" to "road"?  Looked like you got it right first time round.  highway=road translates as some sort of road, don't know what, needs fixing.  See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Droad

Would also suggest adding bus=yes (or psv=yes if taxis are also allowed in) as at the moment the access tags disallow all use except pedestrian).

Cheers
PlaneMad (2017-10-04 05:03:16+00:00): Thanks for your edits, but this looks like an incorrect way to tag proposed roads. Please check the tagging on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed

Change it from `highway=X` -> `highway=proposed`+`proposed=X`
parkrrrr (2017-03-23 15:41:39+00:00): I originally created all of these polygons, and I tagged them based on information from the wiki, but I never liked how that made them show up on the map, or that I had to manually delete the "building" property each time. It just seemed wrong to me. User jgon6 edited my St. Vincent's polygon to "landuse: religious" which seems appropriate, so I edited the rest of the polygons I'd created similarly to match that one.
RichRico (2017-03-23 17:30:02+00:00): Hi  Brian@Brea.
Thanks for contributing with OSM.
I found one of your changes where you removed a piece of street when you had information from Turn Lanes. According to the image yes exite turn lane in that place.

I will reverse the change.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47102518
Supaplex (2017-04-07 15:23:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
tux67 (2017-03-24 15:55:07+00:00): den 3. Eintrag dieses Anwalts an der gleichen Stelle hab' ich jetzt aber mal gelöscht .. und wenn die Wilhelmstr. 90 auch ein doppeleintrag ist .. lösch ihn bitte auch.

Gruß tux67
apm-wa (2017-07-23 16:58:56+00:00): Is this a car dealership or a toy mekany?
tux67 (2017-03-23 20:15:40+00:00): Hallo , 
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithilfst die Kartendaten zu verbessern. 
Einige Anmerkungen zu deinem Änderungssatz: 
- Playground war es vor deiner Änderung 
- jetzt ist es leisure=recreation_ground, den es so nicht gibt.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground

- der Name wird nur verwendet, wenn es ein wirklicher Name ist und keine Funktionsbeschreibung
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Wenn es ein Spielplatz ist, dann mappe es bitte als leisure=playground und nimm das name tag weg (dann ist's so wie vorher ;-) )

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden: 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 
Gruß 
Stephan (tux67)
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf 
Wichtig auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-23 20:16:36+00:00): Hello.
How did you detect duplication? What's the duplicated way for this one 480220079 for example?
user_870861 (2017-03-24 09:10:24+00:00): hello
duplication is detected with osmose (a qa tool http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr)

to see old issues :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/done?source=22066&item=1230&class=1
Upendrakarukonda (2017-03-24 06:18:57+00:00): Hello  frederic ehounou,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, May I know the reason behind these deletions?

Best,

Upendra.
GerdP (2017-08-31 10:24:08+00:00): Hi!
Please check typo highway=alley
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rng
The all look like highway=service + service=driveway to me.
Verdy_p (2017-09-01 19:00:54+00:00): No typo, this is documented and part of several presets in editors.
What you sugest would be just equivalent if you had used service=alley; but alley is suitable where it is when driveway is not !
GerdP (2017-09-01 19:09:05+00:00): That's new to me. I don't find that tag in the wiki or in JOSM presets. Where do you find it? Taginfo shows only 7 uses, so I think that editor should be corrected.
Verdy_p (2017-09-01 21:37:48+00:00): C'est pas grave j'ai pris ta suggestion pour les 4 ways
xmaper (2017-03-23 18:54:30+00:00): чо за фигня ?  этот магазин с пол района где модераторы баньте комерсов
xmaper (2017-03-24 04:24:55+00:00): а все норм ошибся
Warin61 (2017-03-23 23:07:09+00:00): Relation 4246123 is now not closed ... it was closed yesterday.... Possibly the ways you deleted were used by this way? ?? History says you were the last to touch it.
FvGordon (2017-03-23 23:27:37+00:00): I have just sorted the members of this boundary relation (without removing or adding any members). The JOSM relation editor now shows a closed ring.
Warin61 (2017-03-23 23:53:10+00:00): OK. I'm using OSM Inspector to try and get the errors down.. easier than using the error files from making a map. Once those are down I'll try using the error files again.
marc__marc (2020-02-02 21:44:46+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2942685213
can you draw the extend of the camp ?
and add a node entrance on the road :)
Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse (2017-03-23 21:49:12+00:00): Hello,
You've accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data in the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset :)
I'll delete it...
Also, it would really help if any changeset comment that you use has meaningful comments in it.  Yours only has hashtags in it - there's no description of what you're doing.

Best Regards,
Andy
apm-wa (2017-08-10 15:32:25+00:00): If this is a pharmaceutical plant, it is not a clinic.  I'm reclassifying it.
Spanholz (2017-03-23 18:20:30+00:00): Please do not add imaginery parks to OSM. We map only existing stuff.
eggie (2017-03-23 19:48:37+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.