piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-09-12 12:23:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
muramototomoya (2019-09-16 04:16:49+00:00): こんにちは。OpenStreetMapを編集していただきありがとうございます。
データの作成方法についてお願いがあるのですが、歩道を作成される際に、歩道が他の道路と交差する箇所ではラインとラインを繋げるようにしてください。そうすることで、ルート検索に使えるようになります。
よろしくお願いします。
@Garam (2019-09-19 10:40:18+00:00): 로마자를 표기함에 있어서 낱말별로 띄어쓰는 것을 권해드립니다.

이는 가령, 춘강식물원의 경우에는 Chungang singmulwon로 표기하는 식입니다.

관련해서 대한민국 국립국어원의 견해를 붙여드리니 참고하시기 바랍니다.

https://www.korean.go.kr/front/onlineQna/onlineQnaView.do?mn_id=216&qna_seq=154366
https://www.korean.go.kr/front/onlineQna/onlineQnaView.do?mn_id=216&qna_seq=135189
viloan (2019-09-12 12:26:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
tux67 (2019-09-12 14:08:43+00:00): aepunavy - what is your local knowledge about the access restrictions for the service roads you added? As you connected 2 major roads, routers might point drivers to acess the service road as a public road while they seem to run on private /company ground
Br
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74391397
aepunavy (2019-09-12 14:34:50+00:00): Hi tux67,

Thank you for looking into my edit. I had made this edit based on the GPS traces of our driver partner. I could not find any evidence of this road being private as it lacked street imagery. I understand your concern and I am completely aligned with your view on the problem associated with joining these 2 major roads via a service road. Let me know in case I should change the access restriction. I am inclined towards adding meaningful data towards OSM and would be happy to learn from the community.

Regards
aepunavy
tux67 (2019-09-16 14:07:41+00:00): As long as there is no real local confrimation, that this street is open to general access, I would add a respective fixme note to the way connecting the streets!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74391397
viloan (2019-09-12 12:31:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
frosm (2019-09-12 12:35:05+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
n'hésitez pas à renseigner des moyens de contact pour la bibliothèque (site web, téléphone)
par ailleurs vous avez mis la bibliotheque au meme endroit que la police. est-ce que l'un remplace l'autre ? ou ce sont à des étages différents ? ou dans des ailes différentes du même bâtiment ?
bonne continuation
123thebest (2019-09-13 04:19:09+00:00): Hi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-12 12:49:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 74274602, 74288459, 74288529, 74377760, 74377783, 74378234.
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-09-13 04:12:59+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Двойная адресация отмечается по схеме addr:* и addr2:*.

Я исправил, можете посмотреть для примера.
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-09-13 04:16:17+00:00): И addr:city (Город) вносить не нужно, в РФ применяется сокращённая схема адресации.
viloan (2019-09-12 13:00:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-09-13 08:18:09+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - all these ways have about 20 imported tags, but no common OSM tags. Could you check and fix that?

Jan
lokotskov (2019-09-13 09:08:46+00:00): Hi! I need help! 1. it is necessary to delete all changes made by me regarding administrative borders-I understand that there are mistakes and at me it is impossible to delete my edits; 2. I have administrative boundary boundary data from open data sources in shape file format, I need to input this data into OSM. I don't know how to do this. Can you help me?"
literan (2019-09-13 09:12:23+00:00): lokotskov, обратитесь на форум https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21 или в телеграм-канал https://t.me/ruosm
lokotskov (2019-09-13 09:14:14+00:00): спасибо... слишком глобальные изменения - огромная территория, но границы надо уточнить. несоответствие серьезное
lokotskov (2019-09-13 13:11:17+00:00): народ! помогите удалить этот пакет правок!
literan (2019-09-13 14:07:32+00:00): вы там уже поверх направили - конфликты полезли. Могу только удалить все ваши правки после этой, а потом уже эту
lokotskov (2019-09-13 14:08:38+00:00): Ок,  удаляем все
lokotskov (2019-09-13 14:09:17+00:00): Могу я обратиться к вам за консультацией в личку?
literan (2019-09-13 14:10:26+00:00): правки я сейчас удалю, но потом исчезну до вечера воскресенья (поэтому ответить оперативно не смогу). Но именно в границах я не  специалист - могу только еще раз посоветовать на форум написать
literan (2019-09-13 14:13:25+00:00): Fixed: reverted after the author request.
chachafish (2019-09-13 03:06:35+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM and thank you for your additions to the map. When moving around the map, it is very easy to accidentally grab onto something and move it blocks from where it is supposed to be. This happened when you were working on the 9th and Larimer area. I've repaired the work, so no harm done. It's just something to be aware of in the future. Thanks :)
Palolo (2019-09-17 19:49:34+00:00): Thank you for the mapping. Please also add the tag building=yes
Constable (2019-09-13 17:45:23+00:00): thanks for fixing this up!
chachafish (2019-09-13 03:16:42+00:00): Hello. Again welcome to OSM and thank you for your additions to the map. Actually, updated imagery is available here. Just login to OSM, view this area again, type the letter, "b" (for background) and you will see many options for imagery. Many of these will display updated imagery showing these buildings. Thanks :)
user_5359 (2019-09-12 16:13:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add this node to two relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2961936 (this the mention bus line)  and relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10031830 ? Do you really need the second relation or can I delete it (you don't need a relation for one object)?
viloan (2019-09-12 13:44:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
KarmaCleaner (2019-09-13 07:26:13+00:00): Please, read the docs *before* retagging
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74394907
user_5359 (2019-09-12 18:02:32+00:00): Small hint: The combination of bridge and tunnel is extremely rare. Either you have a bridge and the river flows under (undiminished) or you have a "normal" road, under which the river flows through a tube. I have corrected both situations to a single bridge
mohapd (2019-09-13 14:13:20+00:00): Hi George,

Thanks for the correction. Will ensure to consider this in my future edits.

Looking forward to learning from you.

Regards,
mohapd
user_5359 (2019-09-12 16:15:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Can we move the address node into the building? If you need help: You are welcome.
Andrea Musuruane (2019-09-14 13:07:41+00:00): Ciao. I bar italiani si inseriscono con amenity=cafe. I nomi devono essere indicati in modo completo e senza abbreviazioni. Qundi "Chiesa della Santissima Trinità". Le chiese cattoliche devono avere come attributi anche religion=christian + denomination=catholic. Nel tag name è sufficiente inserire il nome in italiano. Non bisogna quindi mettere lo stesso valore sia su name che su name:it. Ciao, Andrea
BCNorwich (2020-03-28 17:54:25+00:00): Hi, you've added a lot of feature here without tagging them. As such they are of no use or value to OSM.
Regards Bernard.
poornibadrinath (2019-09-25 13:45:32+00:00): Hi Siewjy,
Can I know the reason why access=no tags were removed from the bus interchanges? 
Thanks, 
Poornima
SS_L (2019-09-25 14:20:51+00:00): Hi Poornima, I am from LTA and is currently using OSM for some system. If the road is tagged as no access for all vehicle type, it restrict bus routing from entering interchanges. That is why, the roads cannot have restrictions such as no access. Hope it clarifies, thanks.
poornibadrinath (2019-09-26 18:05:23+00:00): Hey Siejway, the access=no coupled with bus=yes tag essentially is to allow only buses to route through this interchange. 
This is buses only and by removing the access tags, you are basically allowing all motor vehicles to navigate through the bus interchanges and this is affecting navigation more. We would have to add access=no tags for this. 

Hope this clarifies,

Poornima
SS_L (2019-09-27 07:41:40+00:00): Hi Poornima, firstly, all the interchanges were suddenly tagged as no access to all, there wasn't any tag of bus access. This caused problem to our system, i am currently testing out whether tagging as bus access will work or not. Then may I know why are tagging all interchanges as no access to all? This is incorrect, certain vehicles are allowed in interchanges. Are they downloading the Osm for certain navigation system?
jinalfoflia (2019-10-04 08:59:27+00:00): Hello Siewjy,

Thank you for the response, based on the OSM wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Transport_mode_restrictions:

in cases where there are only buses allowed, we'd have to go with the convention mentioned in wiki i.e. `access=no` and `bus=yes` tags. It translates to only buses being allowed on the road, which reciprocates to no other vehicles allowed and thus holds good to the ground truth. 

By removing the access tag, this would allow the cycles, pedestrians, etc to route through, which is not right in the context. You can try this here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=1.43725%2C103.78733%3B1.43738%2C103.78595#map=19/1.43783/103.78648

We will be adding these tags back, you can find more details here: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/35

Also, I'd request you to refer to OSM wiki in the future or in cases/questions like this, reach out to the community through diary post or so, for better understanding. Thanks so much. Let us know if you have any more questions on the same.

Cheers,
Jinal Foflia
SS_L (2019-10-04 09:41:06+00:00): Hi Jinal Foflia,

The issue of tagging bus interchanges access=no, bus=yes would be ok, as I have tested in our system recently. The reason I need to highlight is, recently when you guys made all interchanges access=no, not all are tagged with bus=yes, which caused problems to our bus routing in our system. 

Five years back when we started utilising Osm for our system, there were no restrictions imposed for interchanges, gradually more and more mappers came in and started to make access restrictions at customs and cargo freight areas, which created many problems for us. Roads also suddenly became no access when there are plyed by buses. 

As my job scope in LTA is not a full time mapper, I do not constantly keep track of changes in Osm, I can only implement quick fixes when problem arises for the system and test out better solutions when time is permitted. 

Lastly, going forward, kindly do not tag roads access=no to all, without bus=yes, when buses are plying there. 

Rgds
Shawn
jinalfoflia (2019-10-07 05:41:24+00:00): Hello Shawn,

Point noted. Our team will make sure that these two tags are used in combination when it comes to bus-interchanges and bus-only roads. Thank you!

Regards,
Jinal Foflia
Branko Kokanovic (2019-09-12 19:28:40+00:00): again - as Aleksa mentioned, please stop doing those "number merges":) this is not helping local community, nor geocoding...
Jojo4u (2019-09-17 17:29:28+00:00): I reverted your change and invite you to discuss.

It is no duplication of the _aiport_ (aeroway=airport) but an _address_ for car navigation which is published by the airport itself: https://www.flughafen-stuttgart.de/an-abreise-und-parken/anfahrt-mit-dem-auto/ (only german language available). I'm in discussion with an other mapper about this node as well. I propose to make the distinction clearer by adding "Terminals" to the address nodes.
Jojo4u (2019-09-17 17:36:00+00:00): By the way: An account with one changeset deleting nodes and relations is no good style!
Aleksa M (2019-09-12 15:53:23+00:00): Please stop this fixing. The consensus in Serbia is not to combine house numbers, but to write them separately. It's not right to edit in a such way, on your own. Especially when you don't know local OSM rules.
Branko Kokanovic (2019-09-12 19:23:27+00:00): Hi,
You didn't fix house number here? You just changed building tag to incorrect value. I know because I was editing them to proper value (with semi-automated tool) based on goverment dataset. Where you are getting value that this was "house" and not "apartments"? I will revert it, but please help me understand how you got to this conclusion?
user_5359 (2019-09-12 16:29:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare  .
Martin Borsje (2019-09-12 18:26:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
user_5359 (2019-09-12 17:39:21+00:00): Hello, please check the relation https:/osm.org/relation/10007553	and https:/osm.org/relation/10007554 .
shadty (2019-09-13 16:16:39+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for the miss in relations. I've corrected the edit under changeset 74445783

Regards,
shadty
viloan (2019-09-12 15:38:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PT-53 (2019-09-13 06:18:26+00:00): Hallo Burisma,
im OSM-Inspector werden für diese Linien
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724074535/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556136411/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556136411/history
Hinweise "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.70972&lat=47.61095&zoom=14&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-09-19 05:31:34+00:00): Hallo Burisma, 
kümmerst Du dich noch darum?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-09-22 06:41:11+00:00): Keine Reaktion! >
Änderungssatz vollständig zurückgesetzt
SHARCRASH (2019-09-12 15:46:29+00:00): + tag corrections
user_8466505 (2020-10-31 23:32:35+00:00): Could you try and make the pathways more aligned to the aerial imagery? I have been working to clean your edits up. Check your Slack DMs.
Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-31 23:41:02+00:00): If you’re referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37511419, that way was originally added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1785400 based on Yahoo! Aerial Imagery (grainy even at zoom level 17). Your efforts to clean up my early edits are greatly appreciated!
Hjart (2019-09-12 18:24:01+00:00): Når du laver cykelstier, bemærk da vores fine vejledning: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning og at cykelbanerne langs Over Engen i forvejen var tagget på "bilvejen"
Hjart (2019-09-12 18:32:56+00:00): Bemærk også at "crossing" kun skal bruges ved egentlige fodgængerovergange
Adamant1 (2019-09-25 06:42:08+00:00): Hi. Not to troll your changeset comments section, but I saw this guys/girls/persons FIXME to fixme edit come up in my feed and I was like "well, this is totally going to piss someone off." Glad it got reverted. I looked over some of the other persons edits and it looks like a lot of them are down right trash. So, hopefully, reports to the DWG on the user will follow. Not necessarily by you, but hopefully by someone. Id be surprised if they haven't been alerted already. I totally thought there was just a discussion about this on the mailing list.....................Anyway.......Lost...my....train...of...thought....Went.....Know where...zzzzzzzzz
freebeer (2019-09-27 10:19:05+00:00): hallo honourable hadam hant,

you are correct, andy townsend (SomeoneElse) from the dwg did comment on one of the multiple changesets that in my rough, very rough estimate, affected some 40'000 FIXMEs across the continental 48 of the us of a.  no attempts i could see were made in other countries.

my guess of 40'000 XXX FIXMEs must not be taken as gospel, it is a gut feeling from my reverts, and should probably be revised downward by an order of magnitude or three.

the recent edits by this user have been automated octothorpe-prefixing of colour values.  i pointed out one error that would be fixed by a second pass, and i have been racking me brane to come up with a false positive, as most colours by name seem to use letters outside the hex range.

this user's changes i did not revert mixed FIXMEs with other changes, so the count of FIXMEs in the us of a will be somewhat greater.  well, would have been.

i won't mention i got into a flamewar with another noted osm contributor about my multiple reverts.  i wish to think it ended amicably, like when i got the paraphrased response that i was having fun with osm.

and i really wish i can continue with this, that osm as it is remains a joy to contribute to.  wait, me papa told me never to use a preposition to end a sentence with.

oh gawd, i've once again devolved into me typical state of floral rubbish.  i wish to be removed from this curse.

cheers