piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Константин Гам (2020-02-07 10:37:28+00:00): Не надо пожалуйста завышать статусы и выдумывать сквозняки там, где их нет.
На местности есть знаки ограничивающие проездную способность данных дорог. Если вы их не видели, рекомендую заехать, посмотреть. Фотографии есть.

Мапинг под навигаторы и рендеры категорически запрещён!
Dinamik (2020-02-09 11:38:31+00:00): Здравствуйте! На местности хорошо видно, что улица Пилотов и Кирпичная дорога являются стволовыми дорогами, собирающими на себя трафик с прилегающих проездов. Этот вопрос ранее обсуждался: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=238631#p238631 .
mariotomo (2020-02-04 22:31:53+00:00): I'm afraid you have joined an edit war here.  this road was originally 'unclassified', and has been 'residential' and 'tertiary'.  I don't think it will stay 'unclassified' much longer, unless we agree what is what here in Panama.
if you want to document your logic in a corresponding wiki/Panama, be welcome!
happy-camper (2020-02-05 00:09:23+00:00): Hello Mariotomo, Thank you for filling me in on this, I downgraded to unclassified because it was residential going through Aguadulce. I’m okay with either classification.
mariotomo (2020-02-05 12:51:56+00:00): in Panama we seem not to know the use of most roads.  something that would help would be collecting GPS traces for intermunicipal bus routes. I would use this information to convert 'residential' and 'unclassified' to tertiary or above.  or we would need to ask locals to help, which I have been trying the last three years and has proven an even more complex task.
ajf3934221 (2020-02-05 18:44:20+00:00): Hallo, wie wäre es damit: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485783024/history

Grüße, A
Qwave (2020-02-05 19:12:33+00:00): Sehr guter Tipp. Fand nichts im Wiki dazu.
Grüße
 T
viloan (2020-02-04 17:57:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2020-07-27 06:34:28+00:00): Facebook 那邊 MapwithAI 判斷出來的道路，可能還是得實際踏查，或對照國土測繪中心開放資料版地圖，因為在都會區會把住宅範圍的院子判斷為道路，但實際上沒有，如：
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769717196
實際上短一點，並沒有穿越，不能通到其他巷弄
另外 MapwithAI 在山區會誤判高壓電塔下有道路，通常實際上的確沒有，也得留意。
mariotomo (2020-02-04 22:39:49+00:00): can you document the logic?  a road going from the 'troncal' (panamericana) to comparatively relevant towns as Olá does qualify as secondary to me, while the remaining links to El Copé and Las Huacas may be tertiary or even unclassified.  you may have noticed that there is no agreement on classification here.  your opinion, if not explained, will likely be edited back to something else by some of the other randomly editing people here.
please be welcome to explain, we have a wiki for Panama.
happy-camper (2020-02-05 00:11:15+00:00): Hello Mariotomo, I was under the impression that higher classifications should not dead-end in towns. After consulting with a fellow editor, I now know that isn’t a hard rule that can be used in all countries. I can reverse some of these edits, unless you wish to do so.
mariotomo (2020-02-05 12:46:40+00:00): Panama has very limited editing forces, so if you want to help please do so.  meaning: please review your edits yourself.
happy-camper (2020-02-05 18:46:43+00:00): I made the changes back to secondary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80548506
mariotomo (2020-02-05 19:46:24+00:00): :+1:
muralito (2020-02-05 02:27:41+00:00): Hola 
¿porque borraste el nodo que representa la localidad? Sin eso es como que no exista...

¿y le cambiaste el nombre?
el nombre es Boca de Cufre, no Balneario. Boca de Cufre...
Patricio Iglesias Long (2020-02-05 12:03:28+00:00): El nodo fue por error. el nombre lo hice por información del poder legislativo . https://legislativo.parlamento.gub.uy/temporales/D2017120873-007862828.pdf
muralito (2020-02-05 12:59:53+00:00): OK. Gracias. Para las localidades hay diferentes fuentes de información que se pueden adoptar, y a veces hay discordancias entre ellas. Esta es una de esas veces.

Casi siempre se usó como fuente los datos abiertos del INE, de Correo y/o de DNC (Catastro).

Tanto INE como Correo lo nombran como "Boca de Cufre" (en particular el Correo le asigna el CP 80300, no?). DNC lo nombra como "Balneario del Cufré".
Ademas ese proyecto de ley lo definiria con otro nombre oficialmente.

En OSM se le pueden poner varios nombres a un elemento, "name", "alt_name", "official_name", ...

En "name" es el nombre común, asi que si la mayoria de la gente le llama "Balneario Boca del Cufré" asi tendria que ser, y en la etiqueta "official_name" iria el nombre oficial de la localidad (o puede no ir nada si es el mismo que "name")

Para que tengas una comparación, en el caso de Uruguay, uno es "Uruguay" y el otro "República Oriental del Uruguay".
Hjart (2020-02-04 19:44:59+00:00): Bemærk at navnefeltet kun bør udfyldes med egentlige navne. Der er dedikerede felter til beskrivelser og noter mm
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-05 07:47:06+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80573454

#revert
#vandalism
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-25 17:13:42+00:00): nao tem estrada em construção neste formato aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7184993543 vou apaga-la pra quando houver um formato correto
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-25 17:14:19+00:00): desculpe, não vou apagar, mas o formato está errado. depois precisa ser checado
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-06 04:34:14+00:00): What you meant by camp_type-wildcamp on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769726779#map=16/45.9827/-84.9308 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769726780#map=19/45.98743/-84.93626 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769726781#map=16/45.9938/-84.9515 ?
Fat Yust (2022-09-06 10:59:45+00:00): Hello Mateusz. The camp_type tag describes if camping is allowed on that section of the trail. So, wildcamp indicates that wild camping, also known as dispersed camping is allowed at this part. Much of the land is held by private landowners that do not allow camping, so it is an important distinction.
Source: https://gis-nct.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/north-country-trail-public/explore
tomhukins (2023-07-17 12:52:25+00:00): Thank you for improving the map.

I notice you have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222756984 as amenity=bus_station but its name suggests it's a bus depot: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:depot

Also aerial photography suggests it's part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488047087 rather than a separate bus depot.
mueschel (2020-02-07 11:55:27+00:00): Hi,
this way got 2 'proposed' and 2 'ref' tags - which one is right?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766225066

Jan
vojtechzaboril (2020-02-07 15:04:12+00:00): First it will be primary (I/34), then it will be reclassified to secondary (II/634)
TourenbikerFKB (2020-02-14 16:13:48+00:00): Hallo jande75, warum hast du beim Rückhaltebecken der Wohra landuse=basin in water=basin geändert? landuse=basin war korrekt, 

siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:basin

water=basin gilt zwar auch als richtig, aber in der Wiki wird darauf verwiesen, dass landuse=basin gebräuchlicher ist.
jande75 (2020-02-14 17:55:57+00:00): Entschuldige, das war nicht bewusst. Kann dir nicht mehr sagen, warum ich das gemacht habe.
Hjart (2020-02-04 19:42:04+00:00): Bemærk at "vildfarne" adresser automatisk flyttes tilbage til deres positioner i det officielle addresseregister.
Arne Henningsen (2020-02-04 20:41:50+00:00): Hej Hjart. Mange tak for dit kommentar. Mvh Arne
camelCaseNick (2020-02-19 11:39:01+00:00): Hey,
you have added some wikipedia tags here. Great!
The widely used and documented scheme wikipedia=[lang]:[article] has the benefit of machine readability. For the article names you have provided there are up to 12 different languages in that an article with exact same name exists.
CamelCaseNick
ted3sco (2020-02-23 16:54:52+00:00): Hello, thanks for that. I noticed it too. I made the changes in Osmose. The recommendations were incomplete. Will make the changes soon.
camelCaseNick (2020-02-23 20:47:30+00:00): Thank You!
Iván_ (2020-02-04 19:56:22+00:00): Hola, como veras en la wiki sobre relaciones de tipo boundary: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
El miembro de la relacion tageado como 	admin_centre es un nodo. En la relacion del barrio de los jerónimos es un área, lo cual es incorrecto.

Los mapas pueden estar incompletos, pueden contener errores, pero es importante respetar las reglas de edicion. Para eso la wiki.

Puedes corregirlo?
Un saludo
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80551514
Iván_ (2020-02-05 19:25:35+00:00): Te comento que lo he corregido yo mismo. Un saludo
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80551514
mariotomo (2020-02-04 22:27:19+00:00): :+1:
muralito (2020-02-05 02:19:42+00:00): i doubt you can drive in a normal car in this road, so it shouldnt be unclassified, but a lower class.
muralito (2020-02-05 02:21:02+00:00): the road network is not consistent in the real world, so we shoud also keep inconsistent (as in fact it is) in OSM
Avocadough! (2020-02-05 18:09:10+00:00): Thanks for the message, I changed the road back to track.
Carto'Cité (2020-06-25 09:35:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Le Monop'daily que vous avez ajouté crée un doublon avec celui existant sous forme d'un way fermé : https://www.osm.org/way/703841938
Je l'ai supprimé mais j'ai reporté les tags qui complètent l'élément existant.
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoTransilien
Patr1k_P (2021-01-20 16:53:22+00:00): nazdar, este tam je cukraren? lebo niekto nahlasil este v 2019 ze tam uz nie je a ze je tam kebab
Patr1k_P (2021-01-20 16:54:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3731061155
Glassman (2020-02-04 23:12:35+00:00): Tip: Imagery often has slightly different offsets from the real world. (The companies do their best, but georeferencing the entire world is difficult. And we get to use it for free.) The editor does allow moving the imagery to best fit what's already mapped. Look in the background layers on the right hand side. The adjustment is towards the bottom.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80554304
Chris Fleming (2020-02-05 11:46:49+00:00): Great job, and sad to see Peckhams closed!
ftrebien (2020-02-29 14:33:09+00:00): Hello admasawi. I had promoted RP8 to primary in order to integrate the primary meshes of Brazil and Argentina. Following from the approved classification proposal in Rio Grande do Sul (still experimental but with adepts elsewhere in Brazil), this route should be primary because it is the main way between two somewhat cities: Santa Rosa, RS, and Oberá, Misiones. This was determined back in 2018, so it could be that the information is a little outdated. With the available tools, I re-checked the route and it seems that the main route could be through Panambi/Porto Vera Cruz, or Porto Xavier/San Javier, but it could also be through Alba Posse/Porto Mauá. In all of those cases, the through route could be primary according to the Argentinian classification rules in the wiki. How exactly is Apple deciding such things?
ftrebien (2020-02-29 14:33:39+00:00): *two somewhat large cities
ftrebien (2020-02-29 15:00:58+00:00): Adding to this discussion, a bridge is planned between Porto Mauá and Alba Posse (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponte_Internacional_Alba_Posse_-_Porto_Mau%C3%A1). According to the plan, this would be done before another planned bridge between Porto Xavier and San Javier. No bridges are planend in Porto Vera Cruz / Panambi.
GeoidDude (2020-03-03 00:04:05+00:00): Hello ftrebien, thanks for the question. Admasawi is not currently with our team, so I am responding on his behalf. The decision to downgrade this portion of the RP8 was based on the policy stating rural, primary highways in Argentina must connect cities of 10,000 - 45,000 inhabitants (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Argentina/Highways#Rural_ways). These general guidelines do not mention any details regarding border crossings, so we did not see the statement regarding this specific highway in Misiones at (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Argentina/Highways#Misiones). I will return the classification to primary, and we will note that policy for the future. Thanks again.

Regards,
GeoidDude
ftrebien (2020-03-04 19:13:40+00:00): Great, GeoidDude. I was unaware of the documentation you pointed out in MIsiones and instead was simply thinking along the more general classification guidelines in OSM. It is interesting to see that the generic approach we're following in Rio Grande do Sul would lead to the same results agreed upon by the Argentinian community, it probably means we've found a robust methodology, which was the goal since the beginning.

Regards,
Fernando Trebien
Carlos Brys (2020-03-23 18:19:38+00:00): The RP8 was reverted to the secondary route because it does not meet the requirements agreed in the OSM community in Argentina.
Before making such a change, you should consult local criteria and ask editors why.
Best regards.
GeoidDude (2020-03-24 15:49:38+00:00): Hello Carlos Brys, there appears to be some conflict regarding this highway on the Argentina Highway Classification Policy page. The rural highway guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Argentina/Highways#Rural_ways) suggest this should be a secondary, as the village of Alba Posse does not have 10,000 inhabitants. However, there is a specific note which states this section of RP8 should be a primary highway, because of the border crossing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Argentina/Highways#Misiones).

Let me know what you think,
GeoidDude
Carlos Brys (2020-03-24 19:55:49+00:00): Hello GeoidDude.
It is true thath exists an border crossing, but the connection with Brazil is with a ferry via fluvial way, thath is a broken way continuity, and de brazilian criteria is not equal to the argentinian criteria.
I'm living in Misiones province and I was draw the most of provincial routes. In the argentinian community we was discussed on a long time the way classification, and the actual classification is according with the group.
ftrebien (2020-03-25 01:25:58+00:00): Well, on the Brazilian side we're looking forward to the connections with our neighbors. It's not like routes that go to borders go nowhere else after the border or are unimportant if there's no city at the border on one side. For Alba Posse, this has been acknowledged by the Argentinian community also in this proposal: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=711105#p711105

Also, the article referred by GeoidDude is maintained by the authors of this proposal, which to me looks like the official classification system used in Argentina at the moment: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646619#p646619

I also think that there are times in which adaptations should be necessary on the Brazilian side to ensure that both road networks are properly connected at every level.
ftrebien (2020-03-31 17:25:27+00:00): I've brought this dispute to the Argentinian forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69014
hsc666 (2020-02-05 15:02:41+00:00): Hallo G30G43BR4, heißt die Tankstelle wirklich "Access Tankstelle", d.h. das steht genau so dran? Oder doch nur "Access"?
G30G43BR4 (2020-02-05 15:13:24+00:00): An der Tankstelle selbst steht nur "Access". Ich passe das an. Danke für den Hinweis!
Jakka (2020-02-05 13:48:11+00:00): Aandacht als er reeds een weg getekend is, daar geen tweede erboven op zetten. Heb deze reeds verwijderd.
frosm (2020-02-04 21:09:21+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
merci pour votre contribution.
le nom dans openstreetmap, est réelement un nom :) "distributeur de pain" n'est pas un nom, c'est la description des informations que vous avez déjà entré dans les autres attributs. si vous souhaitez vraiement l'ajouter une 2ieme fois, il y a l'attributs description.
n'hésitez pas à renseigner les heures d'ouverture (24/7 ou pas ?) et la marque s'il y en a une.
bonne continuation
Marek-M (2020-02-05 08:27:00+00:00): Trochę błędów wyszło przy tym changeset. Zamieniłeś dwa tagi miejscowości z 'place' na 'shop' https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/26432853 i 'tourism' https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/692631943 a do jednej relacji administracyjnej miejscowości dodałeś nieprawidłowy tag 'building' https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/9238721. Zrobiłem poprawki a innych błędów nie wyłapałem. Jednym słowem to była dobra edycja ale błędy czasami się zdarzają :)
felipeeugenio (2020-02-09 14:26:01+00:00): Estimado Camilo. Como conversamos, sus ediciones están bajo observación de la comunidad. Alterar nombres de calles para que un software pueda funcionar bien, es un acto cuasi vandálico. Ediciones como estás serán reversadas. Intentaremos conservar los cambios que si están correctos de manera manual
zarl (2020-02-05 11:29:48+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzung!
Zarl
user_5359 (2020-02-05 04:32:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! 
Short hint: If school (weekdays) and church service (Sundays) have different times, they should be separated in two points (inside the building). The school gets the key opening_hours, the church the key service_times.
bingo (2020-04-22 13:11:58+00:00): Hallo Lea, ich wollte gerade ein paar doppelte Adressen bereinigen, die mir bei OSMsuspects! aufgefallen sind. Normalerweise tagge ich das Gebäude mit der Adresse, lasse aber address nodes stehen wenn sie nicht doppelt sind. Dein address node in der Webergasse 35 ist doppelt hat aber zusätzlich die Eigenschaft disused:shop=boutique. Wenn man nur die Adress tags entfernt, bleibt es aber ein address node und zeigt auf OSMsuspects! auch einen Fehler an. shop=vacant hinzuzufügen ist aber auch nicht erwünscht, wie z.B. in der Spitalgasse 29. Alternativ könnte man natürlich auch die Adress tags am Gebäude entfernen. Wie siehst du das?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-02-06 16:40:05+00:00): Seems like I'm not the only mapper out in La Plagne for the moment ;p

I'm still skiing tomorrow, maybe we can meetup? I'm in UCPA at La Plagne Centre
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-02-05 00:51:55+00:00): boa noite, pode fundamentar esta edição sff, atentendo que não atribuiu qualquer etiqueta ao elemento.

Aguardo justificação. Cumprimentos
hvalentim (2020-02-05 14:53:46+00:00): Quer-se dizer: atente p.f. que não basta adicionar apenas uma morada e ou um nome para que um elemento/local surja no mapa. É ainda necessário proceder à sua categorização. Isto é, é necessário definir de que tipo de local se trata. Uma loja? Um restaurante? Uma empresa? Uma associação? Etc...
Para escolher a categoria do local clique em "alterar elemento" (onde actualmente deve ver "morada"), explorando depois as diversas opções até encontrar a que melhor se adequa.
Por outro lado, constato que colocou o marcador sobre uma faixa de areia, dando como comentário "registo de marca efetuado". No openstreetmap apenas é possível "registar" localizações físicas, típicamente, por exemplo, locais de atendimento ao público ou a localização de uma sede social…
Para reposicionar o ponto basta que use o rato, arrastando o "pin”/marcador.
Tratando-se da sua primeira edição é natural que tenha dúvidas, se necessário pode expô-las aqui (botão “comentário”).
muralito (2020-02-05 01:40:49+00:00): Please do not use old Maplillary imagery. as source for your changes (or other old imagery) 

And revert this change ASAP, of course.

Thanks.
Avocadough! (2020-02-05 17:20:06+00:00): Thank you for the advice Muralito! I have made the revision.
blackboxlogic (2020-02-05 18:31:24+00:00): I hope the address nodes make adding buildings easier, and don't get in the way. Thanks for changing them into buildings. Please do let me know if you find issues with the address nodes, I still have 2/3 of Maine left to do and I'd rather find out before instead of after. Consider joining the #maine channel of osmus.slack.com I'm trying to gather the community so we can collaborate better.
-Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80555841
blackboxlogic (2020-02-13 17:49:27+00:00): I'm curious where you found the name for this park? Everything I can find lists the name prior to your change. osm.org/way/420434108
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80555841
blackboxlogic (2020-02-13 17:50:21+00:00): OH NO I TAKE THAT BACK. Please ignore my previous comment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80555841
Bkissin (2020-02-13 17:56:52+00:00): No worries! https://www.portlandmaine.gov/2235/Fessendan-Park
mueschel (2020-02-08 10:04:27+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag 'BTT' on a route relation - what does it mean? This is not used in other places.

Thanks!
Jan
user_7581226 (2020-02-04 23:48:10+00:00): Hallo cxs, ich bemerke dass Du im Bereich der Stadt Kitzbühel, überflüssige Multipolygone entfernst. Wäre es möglich dass Du hierbei nicht bereits fein gemappte Geländumrisse auf grob abstrahierst. Tipp, ich benutze zum Auflösen überflüssiger Multipolygone, das JOSM Plugin reltoolbox. Mit dessen Funktion Rechtsklick "Polygon rekonstruieren", kann man Multipolygone auflösen, ohne hierbei gleich bereits wohl gemappte micromapping Flächen, zu zerstören. Übrigens ich suche in Kirchberg in Tirol noch Unterstützung. Dessen Bürgermeister Helmut Berger ist bekennender Tiris- Maps Fan.
user_5359 (2020-02-05 04:36:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/4741597258/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I move the node back to the original position.
PT-53 (2020-02-19 16:07:08+00:00): Hallo  tommygey,
das Merkmale Name sollte nur für echte Eigennamen und nicht für Beschreibungen verwendet werden.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Mitarbeiterbereichhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769764672/history
und Werkstättle
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769764673/history
sind keine Eigennamen. Bitte verwende für solche Beschreibungen despcription und nicht name.
Grüße
tommygey (2020-02-19 16:42:37+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

beim Mitarbeiterbereich kann ok. Das Gebäude "Werkstättle" ist keine Werkstatt, sondern der Aufenthaltshatraum (Art Vereinsheim) der Einrichtung/Verein "Werkstättle" für sozial benachteiligte (https://werkstaettle-pfullendorf.jimdofree.com/)
Da dieser "Campus Galli" ist ja ein Freilichtmuseum ist und jedes Gebäude eine Art Sehenswürdigkeit ist, fand ich die Gebäude ansonsten mit Namen zu versehen in Ordnung. Wenn man dort sagt: Geh mal zu der "Holzkirche", oder der "Scheune" weiß jeder, welches Gebäude gemeint ist. Ich habe dies in Anlehnung an die Karte auf https://www.campus-galli.de/besuchen/ so gemacht.
Viele Grüße
Thomas
PT-53 (2020-02-19 17:27:07+00:00): Hallo Thomas,
Du hast Daten in OSM eingepflegt und da gelten die OSM-Regeln.
Wenn jemand eine private Karte selbst zeichnet, darf er natürlich auch Name nach seinem Gusto vergeben.
Grüße