piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zorglubu (2022-12-02 14:53:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Bienvenue parmi la communauté OpenStreetMap.
Lorsque qu'un élément comme la pharmacie est porté par un simple nœud (un point), il faut, pour la supprimer, directement supprimer ce nœud, et pas uniquement les étiquettes qui lui sont rattachées.
Mais il n'y a pas de souci, je l'ai fait ;-)
Surtout, continuez à contribuer !
Merci
ygcgjp5 (2022-12-23 12:07:03+00:00): Labas, keičiant maxspeed reiktų pakeisti ir source žymą (iš defaultinės LT:urban).
cserpell (2022-11-30 18:16:50+00:00): De verdad este paradero se llama "Lider"?
acastrov (2022-11-30 18:27:18+00:00): Desconozco si existe algún documento oficial, pero todos los conocen con ese nombre
zorglubu (2022-12-02 15:02:45+00:00): Rebonjour,
Je me suis permis de passer cette voie en "highway=service", ce qui lui correspond beaucoup mieux. Notez que la clé access=private s'applique par défaut à tous les moyens de transport (motorisés, vélos, à pied) sauf indication spécifique contraire.

cf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:access=private

Cordialement.
user_9434724 (2022-12-23 18:23:49+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you have introduced a dip into part of the Primrose Hill Tunnel, which is clearly incorrect and which I have fixed. In the future please ensure you check all sources before modifying geometries, especially underground ones.
Mauls (2022-12-23 19:41:25+00:00): It was a realignment to be closer to the correct geometry as shown on OS Opendata. It is currently a very badly wrong geometry.
user_9434724 (2022-12-23 19:48:30+00:00): I checked on OS Opendata and historical high-scale OS maps and neither had a dip in the rails.
Mauls (2022-12-23 21:13:51+00:00): The dip was because it was only partially corrected - it was where the correctly aligned section met the incorrectly aligned.
canfe (2022-12-04 16:39:00+00:00): Non penso sia natural wood. Non ce ne sono più in Piemonte.
Sarà landuse forest?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129537115
ZeLonewolf (2022-11-29 22:13:38+00:00): Keep up the good work!
harahu (2022-11-30 08:14:17+00:00): Thanks! I'm still only dealing with the more or less uncontroversial cases of rivers, with no attempts at riverbed mapping. I want to distill the problem down to those harder cases in order to focus the discussion on getting rid of the waterway=riverbank tag.

I'm hoping that a graceful solution can be found to the riverbed mapping challenge later on. Maybe through some holistic proposal that also deals well with other intermittent water covers, like reservoirs. A first step, which I'm considering doing myself, is to document as many as possible of the currently used techniques, along with some notes on their pros and cons. I've done part of the job for reservoirs: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Dreservoir#Mapping_partial_intermittency

I'd love to discuss this with you, should you be interested in finding a path forward.
archpdx (2022-12-02 01:10:15+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for correcting this street name. Please note however, that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM, you can read more about it here: https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation
MxxCon (2022-11-30 08:02:05+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? Why were these tags removed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129537703
eggie (2022-11-30 06:40:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-19 17:44:04+00:00): refeito
Roue-doudou (2025-06-05 15:01:16+00:00): Bonjour,

Etes vous sur de la position de ce guide post ? 45/6 semble très étrange comme position
StC (2025-06-05 21:12:54+00:00): Bonjour,

je tiens l'ensemble des poteaux de ce changeset de la communauté de communes. J'ai fait de mon mieux pour vérifier les données et leur poser des questions en cas de doute, mais une erreur peut s'être glissée.
Roue-doudou (2025-06-06 06:02:25+00:00): C'est vraiment la position GPS qui me met la puce à l'oreille, c'est très peu probable de tomber pile sur 45/6 !
StC (2025-06-06 09:17:42+00:00): Oui, j'avais compris ça mais c'était difficile pour moi d'en dire plus sans savoir lequel des 175 nœuds était concerné :-) J'ai été rechercher les fichiers CVS que m'a transmis la comcom, et je ne trouve aucun point avec ces valeurs. Donc il y a visiblement eu un raté, et j'ai en théorie de quoi faire la correction. Mais je veux bien de l'aide pour identifier le poteau en question.
Roue-doudou (2025-06-06 15:47:52+00:00): Ah, pardon, en effet, c'est ce point : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10226580678
StC (2025-06-07 08:11:24+00:00): C'est corrigé, merci !
BCNorwich (2022-11-30 07:55:30+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your new uploaded area is untagged and therefore meaningless. Could you please describe it with OSM-accepted tags? If not it ought to be removed. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
lipuma (2022-11-29 23:20:13+00:00): Correction: Adjusted grass and footpath (I didn't add anything).
Colin Smale (2022-11-30 11:22:17+00:00): Hi! Can you explain how removing nodes from an admin boundary is an improvement? The source is reasonably authoritative, so these nodes are not there for nothing. I am referring specifically to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053157085
eggie (2022-11-30 06:59:59+00:00): Dag Telekijker.. De combinatie access=no (gebiedsverbod) met andere tags als foot en bicycle=yes is bijna altijd fout.
access=no resulteert ook in een slechte rendering.
Het pas verdwijnt zo goed als van de kaart in zichtbaarheid.
Je edits..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129539159

Waarom access=no hiet gebruikt?
Wellicht motor_vehicle=no ?
Welk bord staat er? 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-30 07:10:20+00:00): access=no omgezet naar motor_vehicle=no

Beter in principe geen combinaties met access =no maken

foot en bicycle=yes verwijderd. Dat is default op tracks . tracktype=grade5 toegevoegd. 

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-11-30 07:18:27+00:00): typo  pas>pad verdwijnt in rendering

De rendering is al weer terug.
Groet
eggie
Telekijker (2022-12-01 16:18:33+00:00): Een track is toch een boerenpad of bosweg, en dus bijna altijd access no met alle loslopende boerenziekte kiemen.  Je kunt als wandelaar ook al schuldig worden aan de verspreiding van vogelpest !
eggie (2022-12-01 18:18:36+00:00): Yep.. maar zo werkt het niet.. De bedoeling is dat het blijft routeren. 😀
eggie (2022-11-30 06:52:38+00:00): Dag Telekijker.

Netjes ingetekend allemaal... 
Tip.. Probeer water en landuse apart te houden. Dus geen water op de landuse grass.
Ik heb wat water uitgesneden.

Ligt water in een vlak dan leg je dat als inner in een multipolygoon.
Gras en water vakt nog niet op, maar bos en water gaat bv door elkaar renderen. Zwemmende bomen. 
Het water en de eilanden bij het Nonennpad zijn voorbeelden van MP's. 

Hier wat leesvoer..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples

Mapse
eggie
emersonveenstra (2022-11-30 15:44:26+00:00): School districts shouldn't be boundary=administrative because they don't have an admin_level. you could use boundary=school for them instead
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129539958
Johnwhelan (2023-03-05 19:05:16+00:00): Try JOSM buildings_tool it adds the correct tag rather than leaving them untagged.  I've corrected a few of your untagged buildings today,
abakus_uploader (2022-11-30 23:31:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Quintindom (2022-11-30 06:07:22+00:00): Great job!
emersonveenstra (2022-11-30 01:16:15+00:00): Why did you move https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664470182 over the lake?
Keegs (2022-11-30 04:29:54+00:00): Sorry about that, I was trying to see if RapiD would identify a better building outline instead of me having to do it by hand.
scarapella (2023-05-22 12:29:05+00:00): Hi t2editme,

On this change set, I think you want both buildings to be outer rather than inner.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Two_disjunct_outer_rings

cheers,
scarapella
emersonveenstra (2022-11-30 01:18:34+00:00): ugh, id... I'll revert it
archpdx (2022-12-02 01:16:30+00:00): Hi,
Please note that edits made on MAPS.ME are uploaded to OpenStreetMap and can be seen by everyone. Please refrain from adding personal notes to the map.
Timmy_Tesseract (2024-02-14 01:21:19+00:00): Good morning. Thanks for mapping this college. I've changed the main tag from landuse=institutional to amenity=college and added some more details.
nereocystis (2023-03-19 19:52:12+00:00): What is the basis for your change? This is not accurate information.
You have expanded the Twin Oaks building to encompass many buildings. Likewise with Pecan Grove.
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-30 05:49:29+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129542256
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-30 05:49:36+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129542158
nevw (2022-11-30 04:51:19+00:00): Is there a bicycle shop still here on the south side of the road?
...or is there only the True Wheels Cycles shop on the north side of Tincogan Street?
Mooseannacle (2022-11-30 04:59:45+00:00): It relocated to the north side some time ago.
nevw (2022-11-30 06:53:44+00:00): I re-tagged the cycle shop on the north site and resolved other nodes no longer needed.
Supaplex (2022-11-30 05:23:04+00:00): 您好：

rest_area 其實指的是公路休息站，不是指停歇的地方
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129543253
nevw (2022-11-30 05:02:34+00:00): The high risk flood area you have marked is possibly not suitable for the OpenStreetMap but is worth a discussion with the local and new OSM Oceania Community at 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/oceania/73 
With the extensive floods recently there may be other agreed ways to map flood prone or flood affected residential areas.

There is a widely used tag that is mostly used for marking flood prone roads https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flood_prone
adiatmad (2022-12-01 03:41:44+00:00): Good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=PASAR (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1118219848). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions) & (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmarketplace). Happy mapping!
mavl (2023-04-25 09:04:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
nevw (2022-11-30 05:29:22+00:00): Hi
Why have you tagged your craft as window construction but listed elevators as a core part of your business?
nevw (2022-12-01 02:07:53+00:00): Hi
you appear to have placed your business at 109 Kirkham Rd, Dandenong VIC 3175 instead of the tagged address at Suite 19/2 Kirkham Rd W, Keysborough VIC 3173.
nevw (2022-12-03 10:51:07+00:00): I have retagged as craft=metal_construction and shifted to Suite 19/2 Kirkham Rd W, Keysborough VIC 3173.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-30 05:22:31+00:00): #mbx_editing
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-30 06:11:20+00:00): Each segment was examined using aerial imagery and other available tools.  There is no trace remaining that would meet the definition of "abandoned" or "razed" IAW the wiki pages.  There are no rails, ties, signals or other remants.  They segments have long been overbuilt by buildings, roads, highways and parking lot.  There are no railways going across the freeway.
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-30 06:16:19+00:00): There are no rails across this roadway.  A local survey was done and there are no rails or sleepers across this stretch of railway that would meet the definition of "abandoned" or "razed".  They have long been overbuilt and replaced.  Along with the trees that used to be here way back when and perhaps the original dirt trails.
mueschel (2022-12-01 19:17:26+00:00): Hi,
please check your edits. You added several nodes likes this one, with all foreign tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10227040456
mueschel (2022-12-01 19:18:05+00:00): ... and the remaining ~300 have tags that shouldn't be there, e.g.

District = مدينة سعد العبدالله
Masjid_Name = الإمام الحافظ المزي
mueschel (2022-12-01 19:33:55+00:00): The general process of data imports is explained here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
TalalQ8 (2022-12-28 12:52:21+00:00): Hi.
I did the validation check and it seems there are no errors since i didnot added any forign tags. however, when i call back my chagestsets from the server i had a note said there are 4 chabgesets unable to download. i donot know how to fix this so kindly if you have any solution to soleve this issue let me know.
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-30 06:22:18+00:00): Definitely no railway here across these buildings or roadway.  There are no ties, sleepers, signals or other objects that would indicate the railway is "abandoned" or "razed".  It simply does not exist (not to say it didn't at one point in time).

There are buildings, roadway and parking lots here.  There are no abandoned objects from the railway.

Per the OSM wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned

"A tag to map former railways, where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure."
manoj@123 (2022-11-30 06:39:35+00:00): I used Bing aerial imagery for Surface tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129546138
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-30 06:23:23+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=27.440300%2C-82.500050%2C18.16
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-30 06:25:46+00:00): Definitely no railway here across these buildings or roadway. There are no ties, sleepers, signals or other objects that would indicate the railway is "abandoned" or "razed". It simply does not exist (not to say it didn't at one point in time).

There are buildings, roadway and parking lots here. There are no abandoned objects from the railway.

Per the OSM wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned

"A tag to map former railways, where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure."
manoj@123 (2022-11-30 06:41:32+00:00): I used Bing aerial imagery for surface tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129546464
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-19 17:19:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118244870/history - what is the meaning of review=no here?
ElliottPlack (2022-12-02 04:10:07+00:00): wow, nice work on this one!
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2022-11-30 07:03:34+00:00): Intersection of Lonesome Road and Highway 59 changed to roundabout. Source - Bing Maps Aerial and Highway Performance Monitoring System FSYS 3. #mbx_usa_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129547401
MapSpot (2022-12-02 16:42:50+00:00): Hi Yuliya. Don't worry about deleting landuse areas that have been modified by me since they were added by Lyft.
I added names to several retail areas that I have been able to validate as a local.
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2022-12-05 11:20:29+00:00): Hi, MapSpot!

My name is Yuliya and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. We really appreciate that you corrected some of our landuse edits.
I am so sorry that in this case I missed that the area has already been fixed. Thank you for pointing this out and reverting my changes.

Best regards,
Yuliya
Mariusz189 (2022-12-22 12:23:20+00:00): Jeśli jest to zabytek to dodanie samej nazwy niczego nie wnosi, trzeba to dodatkowo otagować aby nawigacje wiedziały jaki jest to obiekt.
NorthCrab (2022-12-22 18:05:30+00:00): Tutaj chyba z opisu wynika że to jest właśnie nazwa tego budynku. Ewentualnie można dodać jakiś tag który oznacza zabytkowość ale takiego nie znam na pamięć i trzeba będzie poszukać. Jak dla mnie to aktualny stan otagowania jest okej.
A Hall (2024-08-22 19:25:20+00:00): What graniteview imagery were you using to add Whitcherville Road as a connecting road between Lost River Road and Coventry Road? I visited this on foot from both ends in 2019 and determined there was no evidence this road existed anymore. I was quite surprised to see it showing up on maps again. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71781412
Mariusz189 (2022-12-22 12:25:21+00:00): Dodałem dodatkowy tag określający że jest to pomnik przyrody.
radiotrefoil (2022-12-13 13:55:26+00:00): Amazing work in Cranebrook fellow 2hu fan. Keep it up 👍 BTW if you're on discord there's quite a few people from western sydney on the OSM World server if you'd like to chat. Your work is greatly appreciated
tms13 (2022-11-30 11:19:10+00:00): Thanks for fixing this before I spotted what I'd broken!  :-)
77O2K8ZRG7 (2022-12-04 04:07:01+00:00): Thanks
DavidKarlas (2022-12-21 18:55:29+00:00): FYI, I changed admin_level from 4 to 8 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116553889
ygcgjp5 (2023-04-12 11:21:02+00:00): Ar ši atkarpa vis dar remontuojama? Tuomet reikėtų ją pažymėti highway=construction. Neteisingą barrier ištryniau.
gscholz (2022-12-04 08:17:19+00:00): Hi sitihasanah,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping buildings:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129549619

The other building set was added here: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129500280

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Tilia_J (2022-11-30 13:40:33+00:00): Let op: Dit gebouw is geen kerk maar een gebouw in gebruik als kerk.

building=civic is beter aangezien de oorspronkelijke functie een buurtcentrum was en deze functie ook nu deels door de kerk wordt uitgevoerd. Er worden voedselpaketten uitgedeeld, er oefent een band, etc

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dchurch
Tilia_J (2022-11-30 13:53:11+00:00): correctie, moet building=public zijn.
Reisinformatiegroep (2022-12-01 07:40:46+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast naar building is public
Osmwithspace (2022-12-12 11:42:56+00:00): Hallo,
meines Erachtens ist area=yes bei diesem Objekt überflüssig.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118282431
Darf ich den Tag löschen?
Grüße Osmwithspace
Osmwithspace (2022-12-12 11:44:14+00:00): Und selbe Frage auch für z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118334678
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119145035
ALu68 (2022-12-16 18:32:50+00:00): "area"="yes"
ist sehr beliebt
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pa4
Ausgabe ohne Prüfung auf Richtigkeit
Osmwithspace (2022-12-17 08:34:54+00:00): Ja, aber bei vielen Objekten auch einfach überflüssig.
November2019 (2022-12-17 18:42:31+00:00): Hallo,
natürlich - kein Problem, 
ich möchte auch niemanden mit duseligen Zusatzaufgaben belasten...
Aber woran liegt es,
das die  Angabe "area" immer mit als Defaultwert erscheint? 
Im Moment mache ich schwerpunktmäßig fehlende Adressierung von Gebäuden, da sind diese Flächen schon erzeugt, aber gelegentlich - meist bei Doppelhaushälften muss ich da die fehlende Hälfte nachträglich erzeugen.
Ich werde jetzt drau achten, die Angabe "area" zu entfernen
... Frohes Schaffen und einen schönen vierten Advent ... 
Grüße aus Thüringen November 2019
Osmwithspace (2022-12-19 21:43:51+00:00): Ich glaube der ID setzt das immer, wenn man einer Fläche nicht gleich eine Eigenschaft zuweist oder so...
Und alles gut. Die area-Tags stören ja keinen. Nur mich stören die Osmose-Hinweise, die dann erscheinen... =)
ALu68 (2022-12-20 06:41:40+00:00): Ich benutze ID nicht als Editor. Wenn ich es ausprobiere, ist area=yes nicht default gesetzt - ich muss schon auf der Seitenleiste das "Fläche" Feld anklicken.
Wenn es default wäre, würden ja vielmehr Keys von Anfängern erzeugt werden.

>> Ich werde jetzt drau achten, die Angabe "area" zu entfernen

Machst du aber nicht! siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130212050
gscholz (2022-11-30 08:39:43+00:00): Hi,
this changeset caused several errors regarding self intersecting lines:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129490473

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
will_p (2022-11-30 12:36:24+00:00): Caribbean Plate has closed in the last week or so. Note in window saying they are planning to reopen in Sandiacre. At present the Caribbean Plate sign is still up and no indication of Hotdog Haus opening imminently.
Dave Venables (2022-11-30 12:55:53+00:00): Updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60784790
A67-A67 (2022-12-01 12:46:37+00:00): De tag check_date is bedoeld voor de datum waarop dit object het laatst in het echt gecontroleerd is. Die datum kan dus niet in de toekomst liggen.

De correcte tag voor een openingsdatum na werkzaamheden is opening_date.
A67-A67 (2022-12-01 12:47:31+00:00): Zie ook:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date
Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (2022-12-01 13:49:06+00:00): Goedemiddag A67,
Bedankt voor de tip.
Ik zal het aanpassen.

m.vr.gr.
Martijn.
Shaun das Schaf (2022-12-02 15:56:37+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe ein paar Anmerkungen zu deiner Eintragung:
1. OSM ist primär keine Werbe- sondern eine Geodatenbank. Deshalb gehört auch keine Werbung in den description-Tag. Bitte ändere die Beschreibung doch zu etwas neutralerem, wie z.B. "Coaching und Mentaltraining für Marburg und Wetzlar". Bitte ändere das noch entsprechend.
2. Telefonnummer, E-Mail-Adresse und Öffnungszeiten stimmen nicht mit den Angaben auf deiner Website überein. Ist das beabsichtigt?
3. Auch der Name stimmt nicht ganz mit deiner Website überein. Auf der Website steht "Lilienthal Coaching" (auch im Impressum). Eingetragen wurde "Coaching Lilienthal Gießen für Marburg und Umland"...?
4. Die Angabe der Öffnungszeiten muss in einem bestimmten Format erfolgen, ansonsten kann es nicht richtig maschinell ausgewertet werden. Du hast z.B. statt "Th" für "Thursday" das deutsche "Do" für "Donnerstag" verwendet. Angenommen du möchtest die Öffnungszeiten wie auf deiner Website angegeben eintragen, dann sollte der Wert für opening_hours lauten: "Mo-Th 09:00-17:30; Fr 09:00-16:00; Sa,Su,PH off"

Bei Fragen gerne melden.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Coaching Lilienthal Gießen für Marburg und Umland (2022-12-09 11:35:58+00:00): Hallo Shaun das Schaf,
ich habe die Daten angepasst.

Vielen Dank
jeslop (2022-11-30 12:40:22+00:00): Hola Carlesduba. Bienvenido a OSM.

¿Estás seguro que esto es una estación de autobuses? Las imágenes de PNOA y de Catastro muestran un edificio normal. ¿No se tratará de una parada de autobús? Las etiquetas a utilizar son distintas entonces, mira: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buses

Cambia las etqieutas a las correctas cuando puedas.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
mueschel (2022-12-01 11:26:26+00:00): Something went very wrong here. 
You uploaded 15000 objects that are plain duplicates of already existing ones.

Please always use the normal "Download" function to get data into OSM, never add OSM data from any external source.