piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
l0cKy (2022-02-01 09:51:33+00:00): Hallo,

Das habe ich im wiki überlesen, wird entsprechend angepasst bzw. "rückgebaut"

Idee für Kartierung mit Flächen war es ein Beispiel für den Flächenfraß von Parkplätzen (besonders extrem in der Wüstegasse) zu haben auf das ich später referenzieren kann.

Die Problematik 'Tags von Flächeneigenschaften an ways oder als eigene Flächen erstellen' ist ja ein ewiges OSM Thema...

Ich sehe das Problem von Zerstückelung der Wege. Eine Straße mit cycleway:left, cycleway:right, cycleway:left:width, cycleway:right:width, cycleway:right:surface:color, parking:left, parking:right, lanes:left, lanes:right ... etc... wird spaßig anzupassen zu sein.
(Beispiel aus Berlin: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858527788)

Dachte es könnte daher Sinn machen zumindest die kleinteiligen Parkzonen, die zudem eh immer auch Flächen sind, aus der Straße herauszuhalten
Luzandro (2022-02-01 10:16:29+00:00): ja, wie gesagt: wenn dann sollte es mit parking=street_side ergänzt werden. Wird zwar aktuell bei einem Anteil von 2,6% aller amenity=parking keinen großen Unterschied machen, aber zumindest könnte man es einfach unterscheiden

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/parking=street_side#combinations
Mordechai23 (2022-01-28 12:14:57+00:00): Cześć, nazywaj proszę zestawy zmian. To nie tylko dobry zwyczaj i obowiązek mapowicza: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
wkdgs (2022-02-01 10:18:28+00:00): Hi, für 30er-Zonen gibt es noch einen speziellen Tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:zone:maxspeed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116682325
wkdgs (2022-02-01 10:19:59+00:00): Also "maxspeed=30" ist auf jeden Fall auch richtig. Soll nur ein Hinweis sein, falls du mal Lust hast die Straßen auch  explizit als 30er-Zone zu kennzeichnen.
ftcat (2022-01-28 06:05:43+00:00): Hi Ed_Nrs,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure these hospitals are where you have mapped them? In the imagery they are in the middle of nowhere.
DaveF (2023-06-09 19:31:15+00:00): Hi
Is the name in this & other paths you amended actually the PROW reference?
Would be better using the prow_ref tag instead?
TomPar (2022-01-28 04:06:29+00:00): Hello.  Not quite sure what's going on here with this edit, but the map now shows a "bridge" between Plymouth and Provincetown.  What was the reason for this changeset?  Thanks.
edvac (2022-01-28 22:12:51+00:00): Dear JayPlaysStuff:

We have received a complain about this changeset and a bridge you created that doesn't exist. Could you please explain about this?

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OSM Foundation Data Working Group.
Glassman (2022-01-27 23:28:25+00:00): Is US12 really a motorway consider it has an intersection?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116682576
Mordechai23 (2022-01-28 12:14:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Mordechai23 (2022-01-28 12:14:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Mordechai23 (2022-01-28 12:14:30+00:00): Cześć, nazywaj proszę zestawy zmian. To nie tylko dobry zwyczaj i obowiązek mapowicza: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
jptolosa (2022-02-25 03:29:55+00:00): Hola, estás seguro que ya se inauguró el nuevo puente?
Juan Pablo Meza (2022-02-25 12:45:10+00:00): Hola, así es, ambas pistas, pase por ahí el 24 de Enero del 2022.
jptolosa (2022-02-26 05:37:55+00:00): Gracias por la información, no encontré ninguna noticia que lo confirmara.
PolyDunami (2022-01-27 21:39:47+00:00): The names added in this changeset are from the documents found along with the tax parcel viewer.
javbw (2022-01-28 15:13:36+00:00): There are very crude polygons here. 

please use "Q" to sQuare your buildings.
MikeN (2022-01-28 01:39:16+00:00): Hi, why was the golf course deleted?
eggie (2022-01-27 22:22:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. 
U heeft het correct toegevoegd.
Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
canfe (2022-01-29 17:39:54+00:00): "Aggiunto" così come "corretto" nella descrizione del changeset vanno integrati su cosa hai aggiunto o corretto, sennò non si capisce.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-02 03:22:04+00:00): Please provide source for road geometry that isn't on satellite view.
kkla93 (2022-02-02 04:09:29+00:00): https://gis.johnson-county.com/piv/
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-03 05:20:47+00:00): I see you did site that as a source on your adjustment changeset. I'm curious how you managed to line up the roads so well. Did you use a program to change opacity and overlay it?
kkla93 (2022-02-03 14:48:28+00:00): I used JOSM and brought in the REST service from that site for the 2021 aerials to use as my background and lined it up that way.
felipeeugenio (2022-01-27 23:41:05+00:00): Hola Fabian
Puedes cuadrar las estructuras con la letra Q. Saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116684515
clay_c (2022-01-28 00:50:59+00:00): Hi Russell722,

It looks like you reverted my edits without notifying me. Typically it's polite to leave a message when you do this, or at least a more descriptive changeset comment than "Edited roads."

I changed this segment of US 259 Business to primary because it does not serve as a long-distance route. Through traffic generally follows US 259, which is already tagged as trunk. In good faith, I've reverted the business route back to primary. Let me know if you have any questions.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116687054

-Clay
kapazao (2022-01-29 22:05:03+00:00): Hola, gracias por las contribuciones que estás haciendo recientemente.
Aquí tan solo quería comentarte que para los nombres de elementos no se debe usar siglas, acrónimos o simplificaciones. En la wiki tenemos recomendaciones al respecto. Por ejemplo usa Avenida en vez de Avda. Los programas ya se podrán encargar de acortar el nombre si quieren, pero se leerá bien.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116684629
alex_lofi (2022-02-02 21:34:20+00:00): Hola, gracias por avisar, acabo de empezar en OSM y cualquier sugerencia me ayuda. Creo que he terminado de corregirlo pero le echaré otro vistazo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116684629
GEOIG (2022-01-27 22:41:34+00:00): Added Toyota dealer according to official site http://www.automovileslanzarote.com/ and user's feedback
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116684817
pio2_122 (2022-01-28 13:00:19+00:00): Wkradł się drobny błąd w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25873538/history - odcinek dostał tag ronda (junction=roundabout).
esce (2022-01-28 17:43:02+00:00): Dzięki za info - błąd poprawiony.
clay_c (2022-01-28 00:51:04+00:00): Hi Russell722,

Again, please leave a message when you revert someone's edits, or at least a more descriptive changeset comment.

I changed this segment of US 59 Business to primary because it does not serve as a long-distance route. Through traffic generally follows US 59, which is already tagged as trunk. In good faith, I've reverted the business route back to primary. Let me know if you have any questions.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116687100

-Clay
eggie (2022-01-28 06:57:38+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode. Format postcode zonder spatie.
Gr eggie
felipeeugenio (2022-01-27 23:51:30+00:00): Hola Ruth. Estás dibujando para alguna app? o algún juego?
En general está muy bien lo que haces, solo indcarte que las edificaciones son para cada estructura en particular, es común ver que encierras estructuras separadas en un único polígono. 

Por favor unirte al chat de la comunidad en el link que está en mi descripción. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116686038
lyctkel (2023-12-05 08:19:22+00:00): Hi Tallguy,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/256500221 you wrote
recycling:glass_bottles=2021-11-21
I guess you meant
recycling:glass_bottles=yes
survey:date=2021-11-21
Regerds
lyctkel
Tallguy (2023-12-05 09:04:31+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for picking up on that - my mistake. Have you corrected it, or shall I?
lyctkel (2023-12-05 09:19:21+00:00): Hi Tallguy,
thanks for the fast reply. 
It's corrected now. I just wanted to make the right correction.
Regards
lyctkel
eggie (2022-01-28 06:55:22+00:00): Prima zo...
eggie (2022-01-28 06:51:49+00:00): Dat gaat zo.. even de tijden als voorbeeld
conditional delivery:  

motor_vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (Mo-Sa 06:00-12:00; Su 07:00-13:00) 

De bollard en sommige pedestrians zijn bewerkt door de VRT. De brandweer in Twente gebruikt OSM voor hun navigatieapp.
Let dus op met het plaatsen van bollards. emergency=yes toevoegen als er een sleutel op past. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-28 06:54:09+00:00): Klopte aardig zo. 
Dit heb ik nog uitgelijnd mbv BAG en BGT omtrekgericht.
gr eggie
Carto_Ferret (2022-01-31 18:17:31+00:00): Correction: Full URL is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Районні_автомобільні_дороги_Волинська_область.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
McNs (2022-08-01 03:21:37+00:00): It looks as though this change (foot=no when there is a mapped sidewalk) causes issues with websites that use OSM for foot navigation (such as Strava when creating a route). Should foot=no only be used for genuine non walkable streets?
KingCZE (2022-08-01 08:24:00+00:00): It should not. The road itself is not permitted for pedestrians – it is not a pedestrian zone. When there are sidewalks modelled, the foot tag should be disabled on the road, and the navigation (including pedestrian navigation apps) should lead you only on the sidewalks and crossings. If it is not so, or if a navigation app has a problem with sidewalks, it is a problem/glitch at the producer of the software, not OpenStreetMaps and not the tagging. I suggest you contact Strava for them to repair their app if they have such a problem.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-08-01 10:31:54+00:00): Hi, it might be more idiomatic to use "sidewalk=separate" and "foot=use_sidepath" instead of "foot=no". 

See https://wiki.osm.org/Compulsory_use_of_parallel_way

According to the wiki, foot=no is only meant to be used when there are 🚷 signs
McNs (2022-08-04 21:35:57+00:00): Thanks for the additional info @kylenz - that looks to be a more logical approach and would allow any mapping services that use OSM to still recognise these streets as walkable (it wasn't just Strava with this issue - two other websites I use to track wlaking/running activities did not recognise these as streets that were walkable). I agree foot=no should only be for streets/raods where pedestrians should not walk.

@KingCZE will you look to restore these as foot=yes or foot=use_sidepath? I have an interest in tidying this up so don't mind working through the edits.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
eggie (2022-01-28 07:00:25+00:00): Hier nog een handige 'tool' om openingstijden te genereren

openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
au-merci (2022-01-28 07:15:35+00:00): ah, bedankt :) Daar was ik al naar op zoek.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-04 00:45:55+00:00): Please don't add duplicate ways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116687233
eggie (2022-01-28 06:46:26+00:00): Dag au mercie.. Beter niet naar de daken kijken. Wanneer de BAG niet meer klopt een terugmelding maken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-28 07:08:13+00:00): De BAG klopt overigens...  Verder uitgelijnd. Klopt het niet dan terugmelding..  
Wanneer iets fout in de BAG staat komt de 'fout' bij periodieke updates weer terug in OSM.
Mapse.,
eggie
au-merci (2022-01-28 07:13:09+00:00): Hoe maak ik een terugmelding?
Betekent dat ook adresnodes bij periodieke updates weer terug geplaatst of gereset worden?
eggie (2022-01-28 07:24:58+00:00): Dat laatste .. volgens mij niet. Het ligt een beetje aan de BAGimporteur. Dat is meestal een lokale mapper en die weet ook welke gebouwen zijn opgesplitst door andere lokale mappers.
De adressen liggen vaak willekeurig en dat weet de importeur ook. 
Soms is er overleg dan van te voren.
De BAG importeur was dvdhoven 
Die is bekend hier. 

Terugmeldingen doe je hier bij het Kadaster
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=werfstraat%2027&resultOffset=0&objectId=0141200000403840&geometry.x=242004.016&geometry.y=486036.819&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0141010000208091

Even op het potloodje klikken rechts.
Dan komt er een marker op de kaart en antwoord krijg je altijd. 

Laatste udate hier was in 2016.
Via het osm forum kun je om (her)import vragen, maar dan moet de BAG wel kloppen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=853595#p853595

Mapse
eggie
au-merci (2022-01-28 07:35:10+00:00): Bedankt, nuttige info.
Ik zie inderdaad dat mijn handmatige commit 116687198 (gebouw ten noorden) ook in de BAG klopt.

Ik gebruik de webeditor, daar kan ik waarschijnlijk niet de BAG als overlay inschakelen. Jij kunt dat wel met software?
eggie (2022-01-28 07:38:50+00:00): In iD zal het wel gaan als je de juiste url invult.. maar dat moet je dan steeds opnieuw doen..
In josm stel je dat eenmalig in.
Zie mn links die ik je toestuurde over de BAG.
eggie (2022-01-28 07:40:46+00:00): Typo BGT omtrekgericht.. maar als je alles van de BGT instelt zit de BAG achtergrond er ook bij.
eggie (2022-01-28 07:56:41+00:00): editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 

BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Frans S (2022-02-01 16:38:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please tag the buildings just as building=yes
This is standard for mappings for HOTOSM
Best regards and keep mapping
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-08 02:19:53+00:00): Why did you set access=no on

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108816441

Called out in note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=3631770
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
compdude (2022-01-28 02:22:19+00:00): Hi, when you downgrade a road from trunk to primary, make sure to add the expressway=yes tag if it's a divided highway like this one. This will preserve the physical characteristic of expressway that was formerly indicated by use of the trunk tag.

Also, are you using this wiki page as a guide for what roads should be trunk or not? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Dulahey/Oklahoma_Highway_Classification_Proposal
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116688312
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
AgusQui (2022-01-31 03:22:46+00:00): La calle que dibujaste aun no existe, esta en construccion, por favor dejar de editar cosas sin corroborar personalmente, no mapear en base a noticias. Ademas estas genrando errores de ruteo con esta calle.
A67-A67 (2022-01-28 07:11:29+00:00): Hallo Jeroen,
Een verbindingsweg krijgt het hoogste wegtype. In dit geval loopt de verbindingsweg vanaf de primary Rotterdamsebaan tot de secondary Laan van Hoornwijck. Het is dus een primary_link, geen secondary_link. Dat er halverwege een uitrit vanuit Drievliet komt, maakt daarvoor niets uit.
JeroenvanderGun (2022-01-28 09:59:45+00:00): Het hoogste wegtype van service en secondary is secondary_link?
A67-A67 (2022-01-29 00:03:46+00:00): Nee, de verbindingsweg loopt van de Rotterdamsebaan (primary) tot Laan van Hoornwijck (secondary). De serviceweg is een zijweg van die verbindingsweg.

Ways worden in Openstreetmap gesplitst als eigenschappen zoals het aantal rijstroken of de maximumsbelheid veranderen. Die splitsing betekent dus niet het einde van de weg zelf.
clay_c (2022-01-28 02:30:57+00:00): oops, rolled another change into this one. also added expressway=yes to US 77 between Three Rivers and Edinburg
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-12 01:09:47+00:00): single trees should be tagged with a node
carfog81 (2022-01-31 14:22:07+00:00): PD. Ya pude hacer los arreglos de la relaciones
Herman Lee (2022-03-15 11:39:41+00:00): 您在这个修改集中引入了错误的数据，现在将其退回
Herman Lee (2022-03-15 15:42:17+00:00): 您的修改集中存在一些问题，现已经将修改集部分退回。
见
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118508053
Herman Lee (2022-03-15 15:41:58+00:00): 您的修改集中存在一些问题，现已经将修改集部分退回。
见
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118508053
skquinn (2022-01-28 03:44:56+00:00): Resolves note 3020525
Herman Lee (2022-03-15 11:31:40+00:00): 您的这个修改集引入了错误的编辑，现在将您的修改集退回
Herman Lee (2022-03-15 15:40:42+00:00): 见
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118508053
Herman Lee (2022-03-15 11:42:04+00:00): 您的这个修改集引入了错误的编辑，现在将您的修改集退回
Herman Lee (2022-03-15 15:40:33+00:00): 见
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118508053
Herman Lee (2022-03-15 15:40:06+00:00): 您的这个修改集引入了错误的编辑，现在将您的修改集退回
Herman Lee (2022-03-15 15:40:23+00:00): 见https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118508053
wislander (2022-04-05 03:26:46+00:00): I don't understand mixing public transport v1 tags on a way with public transport v2 tags on that same way's nodes, and I've never seen public transport stops mapped that way anywhere else. However, since I haven't lived in Jinan for a long time, I will leave things tagged that way if that's how you prefer it.

DeepL translation:
我不明白在一条路上的公共交通v1标签和同一条路的节点上的公共交通v2标签混在一起，而且我从来没有在其他地方看到过公共交通站点这样的地图。不过，由于我没有在济南住过很长时间，如果你喜欢这样，我可以不做标记。
Herman Lee (2022-04-05 05:02:02+00:00): I have chosen the tags following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China/Transport/Buses . This page is written by myself since there is very chaos on bus mapping around the world. This tag can fit for ptv2 and has a better render without any error or issue. In Jinan, Beijing and other city, the large platfrom often divides into some some platfrom. I think it's proper and irreplaceable.
这个标签是遵循我自己写的wiki页面https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China/Transport/Buses，这个页面的标注方式更适合于中国大陆地区，况且，世界各地的标注方式都很混乱甚至于经常报错，这种标注方法可以有效的保持渲染效果并满足ptv2的方案，并且在其他检查器中和第三方软件中不会报错，在济南等城市经常会有分站台的情况，愚以为这种标注方法没有什么问题且暂时没有更好的标签可以替代它。
Herman Lee (2022-04-05 05:02:30+00:00): I have chosen the tags following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China/Transport/Buses . This page is written by myself since there is very chaos on bus mapping around the world. This tag can fit for ptv2 and has a better render without any error or issue. In Jinan, Beijing and other city, the large platfrom often divides into some some platfrom. I think it's proper and irreplaceable.
这个标签是遵循我自己写的wiki页面https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China/Transport/Buses
，这个页面的标注方式更适合于中国大陆地区，况且，世界各地的标注方式都很混乱甚至于经常报错，这种标注方法可以有效的保持渲染效果并满足ptv2的方案，并且在其他检查器中和第三方软件中不会报错，在济南等城市经常会有分站台的情况，愚以为这种标注方法没有什么问题且暂时没有更好的标签可以替代它。
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-01-28 16:41:38+00:00): Thanks for the fix!
I have to admit I had a little heart attack when I suddenly saw bike_rental with >4000 entries, as I though I missed them while preparing the proposal ;)

Kind regards,
Pieter
blackboxlogic (2022-09-23 17:33:13+00:00): Having house districts in osm seems cool. I'm surprised there aren't more formal tags beyond just a name.
Paul Ybanez (2022-01-28 04:31:52+00:00): Pogi mo vozz