piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bert Araali (2021-05-03 13:22:31+00:00): Hello Jean-Marc.  Thank you for mapping a missing wetland in Uganda.  Kindly make some improvements so we keep our wetlands data significant and of high quality.  The wetland should intially be mapped as a boundary, a protected_area with protect_class=15.  The reason is that all of them are government land and protected by law. Only apply natural=wetland to this boundary relation. Our wetlands are not uniform, but a mixture of papayrus reedbeds, mudplains, bogs and marshes with some pools and often ponds along the shores.  These can be mapped as separate areas, on top of the multipolygon providing the wetland type.  Swamps, being wetland mostly covered in trees are not that common, especially not those covering the whole wetland.  So it's better to remove the wetland=swamp form the multipolygon or relation, the rendering will be fine. The added details about the biotopes are defined as inner areas on these relations, until we cover the whole wetland. When the whole wetland is covered the natural=wetland tag can be removed from the boundary relation, leaving us with just the boundary which allows neutral and proper handling of land conflicts. Be carefull at the mapping the boundaries.  All wetland=* tagged areas should be completely contained within the boundary. Other natural=* areas , especially those overlapping the boundaries should be not. Those completely in the wetland boundaries should.  You also are able to map landuse=* this way.  Important is that the boundaries are not connected to any feature, this allos flexibility to change them and map them appropiate according field surveys, most wetlands boundaries cannot be mapped accurately from satellite imagery. If you need any additional information please do ask or refer to WikiProject Uganda guidelines and training (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Uganda/Conventions-Categories still under construction but a good starting point to get information about local guidelines, mapping practices, quality of the map and get in contact with the local community).  Greetings, Bert Araali
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-03 21:14:35+00:00): Is this definition of wetland foremost an administrative one ? How should wetlands that are not  protected_area be tagged ? Or are all wetlands in Uganda considered  protected_area by Ugandan legislation ?
Bert Araali (2021-05-03 22:35:55+00:00): No not administrative. All wetlands are government land by law, as well as lakes, rivers etc... The boundaries are never gazetted however, even government violates them, but when it comes to protection and eviction reference can go back to aerial imagery as far as 20 years. WHole wetlands are no longer distinguishable on aerial photograps, because they are completely covered with slums. They do exist underneath the buildings, causing typical wetland behaviour like floods, uncontrolled growth of mosquitos etc... especially in Kampala. So we map them based on historical maps, old imagery like bing and then survey in the field.  This might be a daunting and delayed task, the surveying, as you risk your dear life as soon as locals observe you making pictures and notes about the fact their houses are on government land or government wetland as you like. So it's both, administrative but most important physically. If you like to read more about how terrible the situation is read this report:https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwih286Uya7wAhUE8eAKHUjoCyoQFjABegQIBBAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ug.undp.org%2Fcontent%2Fdam%2Fuganda%2Fdocs%2FUNDPUg17%2520-%2520Uganda%2520Wetlands%2520Atlas%2520Volume%2520I%2520_Popular%2520Version.compressed.pdf&usg=AOvVaw06r6l5Zt4FGdbMDnI7UpFh
bxl-forever (2021-05-04 15:54:25+00:00): Hello,
This road had been changed from motorway to trunk.
This is explained here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70087607
Why did you revert this?  Is there something new here?
mux4 (2021-05-04 18:36:33+00:00): I came to update it because the actual speed limits were not those given in OSM.
I changed to motorway accordingly to F5 signs present onsite.
Maybe this changed with the "Ville 30" 2021 project, whose the map is available on https://data.mobility.brussels/mobigis/fr/ and which is mostly up to date according to my comparison with actual signs.
bxl-forever (2021-05-04 21:16:27+00:00): Right, so you’re saying you really surveyed the place and saw F5 signs.  I will inform the other mapper he must have made a mistake, then.
jmapb (2021-10-31 20:26:14+00:00): Hi Daniel... just noticed that you tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/42497780 with highway=traffic signals, months ago.

My goal with complex intersections like one has been to tag so that routes through the intersection will pass through the correct number of traffic lights, to aid in routing calculation and description. 

In this case, drivers will encounter a single stop light, no matter where a car is coming from or heading to. The only way I could figure to do that here was to use three different traffic_signals nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2342949810
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6224367546
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7289701156
The first two are tagged with direction so through traffic eastbound or westbound on Atlantic will only be stopped by one of them.

With this design, the traffic signal tag at node 42497780 isn't needed. So I've removed that tag. Just FYI.

Happy Halloween! Jason
daniel_solow (2021-11-01 12:00:20+00:00): Feel free to remove that and others! You're an active contributor on here so I trust your judgement.

Happy Halloween to you too!
syntex (2021-09-13 21:17:33+00:00): W miejscowości Krusze błędnie zmieniłeś z addr:place na addr:city po prostu dopisując addr:street, natomiast nie sprawdziłeś, że zmieniła się także cała numeracja w miejscowości.
syntex (2021-09-13 21:21:48+00:00): Więc po prostu ukryłeś problem, który i tak jest do poprawienia, następnym razem nie rób tego w ten sposób
Piotr Strębski (2021-09-14 14:49:18+00:00): Możliwe, nie pamiętam :-)
Piotr Strębski (2021-09-14 16:43:57+00:00): To chyba jednak inaczej wyglądało. W danych mapy były uprzednio zaimportowane punkty adresowe z okresu przed badaniem nazw ulicom i po ich nadaniu - mix. Moje działania sprowadzały się do połączenia tych punktów z obiektami budynków, jak również dubletów numerowych ze sobą, a w sytuacji wystąpienia błędu wyłapanego przez walidator - kolizji city i place - dokonałem mechanicznej jej naprawy, bez dociekania zgodności z rzeczywistością (bo operowałem tylko na zastanych danych). Tak mi się wydaje, było to tak dawno, że nie pamiętam.
syntex (2021-09-18 18:17:02+00:00): To samo w miejscowości Trojany
Becky Candy (2021-04-12 14:11:42+00:00): Please zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102806088
Becky Candy (2021-04-12 14:18:19+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings pressing the key Q, thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102806088
Becky Candy (2021-04-12 13:41:08+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102806098
Becky Candy (2021-04-12 13:29:02+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102806152
Jarek 🚲 (2021-04-12 13:14:13+00:00): Hi, this edit changed 920 Bessy Trail to a "religious area" - did you mean to do this?
MiltonMike (2021-04-12 13:19:14+00:00): No sorry that was a mistake - just trying to figure this out.
rthik007 (2021-04-15 08:01:09+00:00): Hi 賴思廷,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road .Kindly check with WAY: 28993367.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102975975
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102806823
NieWnen (2021-04-12 16:28:04+00:00): Warto dorzucić jeszcze 
construction=tertiary

Nie jestem pewny, czy start_date i end_date jest poprawnym sposobem, bo wiki proponuje inny sposób jeśli chodzi o daty, ale mogę się mylić.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:construction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102806904
BestiaPL (2021-04-13 07:06:55+00:00): Zaktualizowałem daty remontów. Dzięki za podpowiedź.
user_390227 (2021-04-12 19:11:45+00:00): bicycle=yes
foot=yes
rkkapilk (2021-04-13 12:45:44+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. It is good to see the community improvising our edit quality with the local knowledge. Always happy to learn from the community.
Xevi (2021-10-30 14:13:38+00:00): Si el cami https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929730409/history segueix ho pots indicar en una nota, el nom que li has posat es incorrecte. El camp name NOMES serveix per indicar el nom del cami , no per fer que surtin noms en el  mapa. No mapajem per el renderitzador
fabiotofy (2021-04-14 13:50:36+00:00): ciao collega, i nomi su OSM vanno sempre per esteso. Cav. quindi metti cavaliere
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102808927
maxxdan (2021-04-15 06:57:11+00:00): Fatto.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102808927
user_177389 (2021-04-12 14:09:17+00:00): Hallo iDjay,

die Verwaltungsgrenzen haben mit Routingfunktionen nicht zu tun. Falls ein Routingprogramm (vermeintlich) wegen Grenzrelationen nicht richtig funktioniert, liegt der Fehler im Programm. Ich werde die Änderung zurücksetzen.

Grüße
Maro
user_177389 (2021-04-12 14:09:49+00:00): Ich reiche ein "i" nach: Mario
Becky Candy (2021-04-30 11:15:34+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102809259
Kovoschiz (2021-04-13 07:38:49+00:00): Something's wrong with the school and the other building?
shanhulittle (2021-04-15 08:01:20+00:00): 建筑物应为building标签，landuse用作主要用作地块标识
Jakob48 (2021-05-09 07:24:34+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,

warum hast Du dieses Spielfeld wieder eingetragen. Das hat erst vor einigen Monaten ein lokaler Mapper aus Allensbach gelöscht. Aus gutem Grund.

Warst Du dort vor Ort? Ich denke nicht. Denn das Feld ist durch die Erd-Arbeiten der B33 Baustelle zerstört. Dort läuft zukünftig die B33 entlang.

Gruß
Jakob48
LySioS (2021-04-12 21:04:25+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue Python30
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Juste pour info, la syntaxe des numéros de téléphones commence par +33 4 66 ...

N'hésite pas à me recontacter si besoin
skyper (2021-05-30 10:46:13+00:00): Salli mümo
Nur `highway=construction` zu ändern bringt es nicht.
`access=no` und alle anderen `construction:*=*` sollten auch geändert/gelöscht werden.

Habe es verbessert, aber bitte achtes das nächste Mal darauf.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
mümo (2021-06-01 09:52:09+00:00): Hey, danke für den Hinweis!
Ich trage immer wieder Sachen mit der App "StreetComplete" ein, darüber kann man das anscheinend nur zum Teil ändern. Danke für's Aufpassen!
skyper (2021-06-01 11:53:19+00:00): Hi
Aufpassen sehe ich nicht als meine Aufgabe. War Zufall.

Spaß bei Seite. Sollte StreetComplete diese Situation dann nicht anders lösen? Benutze die Software nicht, aber vielleicht kannst Du ja das Problem den entwickelten Personen mitteilen. 

Ciao skyper
Eifelkobold! (2021-04-12 23:31:24+00:00): Guten Abend,

vielen Dank fürs weitere Verfeinern des Bahnhofs und meiner Fehlermeldung :) Ich habe gesehen, dass du in diesem Changeset die Rampe mit in den Bahnsteig eingefügt hast. Leider fehlt dadurch am unteren Ende nun die Verknüpfung zu Gleis 46, so dass z.B. ein Routing nicht mehr möglich ist. Auch für die Abbildung des barrierefreien Zugangs halte ich diese Verknüpfung für wichtig.

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
Euskirchener (2021-04-13 05:38:42+00:00): Hallo Eifelkobold,

ich war mir an der Stelle auch etwas unsicher wie ich es mache, das typische OSM-Problem mit Routing über flächige Objekte und dann die Frage wo und wie man noch linienförmige Objekte/Wege in Kombination benutzt.

Aber ich hab es jetzt an der Stelle wieder so umgebaut, nachdem ich mir nochmal andere Stellen angesehen habe und das auch für besser halte.

Gruß
Euskirchener
DDROMAGNY (2021-04-13 09:33:44+00:00): Bonjour, l'ajout de matière pour la table est important mais pour le sol, non indispensable. (ne pas oublier que les éléments peuvent changer dans le futur et qu'il faudra tout modifier). 
Merci, 
Dlephine du CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102811768
◪ Jarv (2021-04-13 14:02:17+00:00): Is the ban on bicycles and horses sign posted, or is just physically unsuitable for bicycles? If it isn't sign posted as bicycles & horses banned then surface & smoothness tags should be used instead of bicycles/horse tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102811786
talkytoasteruk (2021-04-13 18:34:50+00:00): That area has kissing gates at all entry points (and barbed wire fencing all around it) so bicycles and horses are not allowed. It is a local historical monument/groundworks/archeological site.
Reeniz (2021-04-13 19:29:13+00:00): wrong relation(12571393)
Liqid1010 (2021-04-15 10:24:40+00:00): Veľa vecí sa tu totálne pokazilo, treba ti nejako opraviť, alebo cely changeset reversnut
Ak to je editorom tak prosim naozaj nepouzivat tento editor, je teraz vela prace to opravit
Liqid1010 (2021-04-15 10:25:47+00:00): Tiež sa treba pozriet na to ci by sa mali pridavat tie názvy, kedze si nemyslim ze to su naozajstne nazvy ihrisk, ak ide o sport a polohu, to si vedia ludia odvodit od tagov ihriska, netreba na to nazov
NieWnen (2021-05-23 16:44:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2600300
Weryfikowałeś będąc na miejscu, czy dodałeś na podstawie innego źródła?
Sandal man (2023-10-06 13:52:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936318357
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929770972#map=17/37.82498/-1.46711
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930329245
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976388041
¿Puedes echarles un vistazo? Están todos sin etiquetas, y algunos más en el área.
Saludos Jano
RussNelson (2022-12-22 13:25:27+00:00): I'm looking at the Google Street View for the street that crosses this spur: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394148791 and it sure looks like the rails are still there.  Have they been pulled?
joost schouppe (2021-04-27 08:59:48+00:00): Hoi Noel,
Je hebt hier de LF6 terug actief gezet, maar volgens mijn informatie is deze verwijderd op terrein. Al heb ik wel nog bordjes aangetroffen...
noelbov (2021-04-27 15:41:18+00:00): Hi Joost,
Dat LF6 terug actief is gezet is dan een niet bedoeld neveneffect van het toevoegen van fietsknooppuntroute 35-37 zoals aangekondigd op https://www.toerismevlaamsbrabant.be/Images/TrajectenFNW2021_topo_v2_tcm251-125034.pdf en te zien is op https://www.fietsnet.be/routeplanner/default.aspx en https://www.vlaanderen-fietsland.be/nl/routeplanner ...
vr.gr.
ntzm (2025-05-07 15:21:49+00:00): What is the meaning of railway=site? I can't find it documented anywhere
ALu68 (2021-04-13 18:45:59+00:00): Hello, OSM is not for advertising purposes.
Vinber-Pro (2021-04-26 15:31:22+00:00): Salut,
pour les télépones, on ajoutera le +33 des codes internationaux, pour avoir +33 6 XX XX ...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102812593
Jeremy007 (2021-04-27 09:40:52+00:00): OK merci !
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-04-12 16:39:51+00:00): Hallo Lotte,

Kan het zijn dat je een stukje Reetsesteenweg teveel hebt meegenomen?

Mvg,
Pieter
Globelotter (2021-04-13 12:32:34+00:00): Dag Pieter

Ik denk het niet. De wandeling gaat een klein stukje heen en terug langs de Reetsesteenweg, tot aan de Heimolen. Is dat wat je bedoelde?

Mvg
Lotte
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-04-17 12:07:03+00:00): Aha, dat verklaart! Het gebeurt niet vaak dat wandelingen een 'appendix' over een steenweg hebben, vandaar mijn verwarring. Met deze uitleg erbij lijkt alles op het eerste zicht correct.

Ik heb nog een 'note' op de relatie gezet om dat te verduidelijken. Een 'note' geeft wat extra uitleg aan andere mappers en is perfect voor dit soort verduidelijkingen.

En bij deze weet je dus ook hoe commentaar op 'Changeset comments' werken.

Mvg,
Pieter
lxpeter (2021-04-17 19:03:47+00:00): Hi,
Reviewing this very large change set, it looks like it is machine scripted changes. It has off-set previously carefully mapped street and building locations, since the satellite image it is based on is off by 10-15meters. 
Also, the building outlines are based on the roof outline instead of base, further offset correct location.

Kindly, would you consider reverting this change set? This way we can work together with smaller change sets that are easier to review.

If not possible, please consider using the same script, and do an offset so that streets and buildings end up in correct locations? There are uploaded GPX tracks that can be used for offset, and if possible add your own inspection, gps tracks for offset.
aceman444 (2022-01-24 22:59:09+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za nazvy zastavok, ak su spravne. Prosim uvadzajte ale zdroj, snimky Bing to nie su. Dakujem.
SHARCRASH (2021-08-23 16:04:45+00:00): Hi! I think it is very possible that the issue comes from the service you used. I've tried several different ones, on OSM with OSRM & Graphhopper included, they all accepted all intersections. Routing proposition is rather something else, not all propose the shortest routing. Which one did you use?
Becky Candy (2021-05-04 16:06:21+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, and avoid mapping small spots as buildings,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102814157
Becky Candy (2021-05-04 17:15:44+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q ,and avoid mapping small spots as buildings that are not buildings ,zoom in to clearly see the buildings, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102814157
map per (2021-04-30 13:02:41+00:00): Hello Bathyscapher,

you removed the narutal=water tag of this harbour (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43186736). However I guess it hast't really fallen dry.

Best wishes
map per
Bathyscapher (2021-04-30 17:31:44+00:00): Dear map per, thank you for your message. It looks like there is some ambiguity about the proper mapping of a marina (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dmarina#Things_to_avoid). As I read it, the ideal way would be two polygons: one for the marina (including land) and one for the water (here, the lake). I will give it a try and then we will see how you like the solution :)
map per (2021-04-30 20:31:18+00:00): I have no experience with mapping marinas, but I think it looks good now
gscholz (2021-04-17 06:15:29+00:00): Hi rodolfovargas,
I can see some more progess now but there are several errors left:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-68.70918&lat=-16.05247&zoom=17&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

These kind of errors are easy to detect, if you use the  JOSM validator.
Guido
ehs (2021-04-14 11:42:25+00:00): My adjusted opening hours are wrong.
Previous version #73581689 is correct!
habi (2021-04-14 21:40:33+00:00): Hey!
In this changeset you tagged several buildings with "building:leevls=3"
I corrected this typo to "building:levels=3"
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
habi (2021-04-14 21:41:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102953364
woodpeck (2021-04-12 17:53:01+00:00): Hello, in this changeset and others you made today, you have deleted thousands of objects from OSM, causing a lot of damage to the map. Other mapppers have repaired the damage but please be careful not to do this again! Additionally, your changeset comments should describe in a human-readable form what the aim of your edit is. Your changeset comment of "#gomicron21twsg;#gomicron21tw;#gomicron21twf11meprod" is gibberish that nobody can understand!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 23:52:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108549522 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some allegedly google-source changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105322114
Frans S (2021-04-16 15:21:56+00:00): Hello Thea. Thanks for mapping here.
Something weird. You mapped appr 17 buildings which were already mapped by another mapper a week ago, have been mapped again by you, (over the existing ones
Don't you run the validator tool before you upload your work?
You should be notified then
I correct the issues
Best regards and keep mapping
Thea Satneshamah (2021-04-16 15:51:08+00:00): Hello Frans S,
thanks for the message. I really don't know what happend. But I remeber that during my jlast mapping I had to forcequit my JOSM once. Maybe it is the reason of this error? I have never done validation, I always just mapp. Thanks for the correction.
Frans S (2021-04-18 10:26:32+00:00): Hi Thea.
It is common use to review your own work before uploading it.
The validation tool and the inline validation map paint style  ought to be used for it.
Common issues,  squared buildings, overlapping buildings and areas should be found and solved.
When you come across other mappers errors on the task you are working on, you are welcome to solve these as well.( it reduces validators work :-)
best regards
ottwiz (2021-04-12 16:14:08+00:00): I also used Esri Clarity Beta for road tracing, and TIGER Roads 2020, jsut forgot to type it here. Ahh, these legal stuff. I spent to much time making these changes.
user_2066394 (2021-04-12 17:50:31+00:00): Die beiden Hausnummern sind dort seit 2015 bereits so eingetragen. Durch die Ergänzung hast du Duplikate erzeugt.
maierp (2021-04-12 17:59:52+00:00): Sorry, ich hab sie wieder entfernt und das Entfernen zum Überprüfen freigegeben. Danke für den Hinweis :)
Frans S (2021-04-18 08:04:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark.
When you map large buildings (high) please move the building after drawing it over the roof lines, to the place where the building meet the ground.
Due to the angel the imagery is taken you see both the siding and the roof, so do not include the siding (and shadow) in the building. The project imagery don't show so much details but when the object is also visible on Bing it might be clear how the building looks like.
Best regards and keep mapping
clay_c (2021-04-19 19:04:00+00:00): Reverted. Please use more meaningful comments than "buses" so other mappers know what you've done and why.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103218671
ndm (2021-04-12 19:48:16+00:00): Inconsistent tags compared with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8623168229/history

operator:MNC versus provider:MNC, etc.
ndm (2021-04-12 19:50:52+00:00): Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8620964963
eserte (2021-04-15 16:17:44+00:00): Noch eine Info dazu: Der Lidl wird abgerissen, aber laut
https://www.deutsches-architekturforum.de/thread/11145-bauprojekte-im-rudolfkiez-friedrichshain/?postID=687556#post687556 auch wieder neu gebaut.