piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-31 15:02:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61232249 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, fictional data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2119].
chnav (2018-03-06 03:35:45+00:00): Здравствуйте, а зачем вы удалили здание Дворца Горняков ? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53366971

Я его восстановил, но вообще такое тяжело детектировать и исправлять, легко может остаться незамеченным. Пожалуйста будьте аккуратнее. Спасибо.
openamap (2018-03-13 15:19:04+00:00): お店の名前は
name=ウエルシア
branch=尼崎潮江店
の様に分けた方が良いと考えます

こちらをご覧下さい
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Naming_sample
ペット用の鹿 (2018-03-13 16:11:44+00:00): @tadanet3
アドバイスありがとうございます。
早速編集してみました。
OSMwikiの中に、こういった店舗名のサンプルがあったとは知りませんでした。
非常に参考になりました。
saintam1 (2018-03-03 20:58:45+00:00): Здрасти, Ники,

Видя ли, че Фандъкова използва картата ни, за да оповести удължаването на пешеходната зона: 

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1735500709847243&id=823170804413576

:)
Warin61 (2019-03-28 03:27:19+00:00): Hi,
Adding a name and a ref is not enough.

A shop you say ... what kind of shop? Clothing, computers, newspapers???

What do the letters RSLA stand for???
user_5359 (2018-03-03 17:01:51+00:00): Hello! Did you see the note 1257714 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1257714)? Is this information wrong. And Please again: The keys "Keywords" isn't defined in OSM! This is used bei SEO spam!
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-04 10:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56866872 where the changeset comment is: revert several changesets by ZHANGPALEX. These changesets contain many deletions, no proper reason was given and the deletions don't match with Bing imagery. Please ask your supervisor why you shouldn't just delete things.
user_5359 (2018-03-03 09:35:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please ass more information: Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
Did you mean this business: http://www.appleking.com ?
Glassman (2018-03-03 18:24:23+00:00): Pete - if you need any help adding more tags as suggest by user_5359 just ask.
damndog (2018-03-03 20:11:28+00:00): Polecam zapoznać się z zasadami ruchu drogowego a w szczególności ze znakami drogowymi (najbardziej interesujący w tym przypadku będzie c-16, którego nie ma na ulicy Królewskiej)
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wzory_znak%C3%B3w_i_sygna%C5%82%C3%B3w_drogowych_w_Polsce
Hjart (2018-03-03 08:55:11+00:00): Bemærk at når du ændrer fra cycleway til path bliver stierne vægtet væsentligt lavere i cykelrouterne
atcomapper (2018-03-03 09:13:23+00:00): Det er op til de enkelte data-brugere at fortolke den tilgængelige data efter deres behov. Som kortlægger må jeg forholde mig objektivt til kortlægning af f.eks. stier, uden at favorisere enkelte brugere eller brugergrupper. Hvis dataen tilpasses enkelte cykel-rutealgoritmer, vil kvaliteten blive voldsomt forringet for utallige andre brugergrupper. I stedet er det op til de enkelte algoritmer at justere deres parametre så de forskellige rutesegmenter bliver vægtet fornuftigt. Her et eksempel på en sti, der før var markeret som cykelsti, selvom det tydeligvis ikke er tilfældet: http://i.imgur.com/kBYa05y.jpg
Hjart (2018-03-03 09:40:09+00:00): Jeg kan kun opfordre til at stier som f.eks https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/mIG_iKkOA49x-RlVzBfguA tagges cycleway og bemærke at det i modsætning til hvad du synes at antage, ikke vil reducere anvendeligheden for andre brugergrupper (primært fodgængere). Dette stisystem er iøvrigt skiltet https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/I7divOwox0hZPUagbBxR0g i den ene ende og https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/GNaMtsq4LA9vP_LfbHgl-g i den anden
Hjart (2018-03-03 10:22:02+00:00): Tilfælde som f.eks dette stisystem lærte mig at tage D21 & D27 m.fl. med et gran salt. I dag er jeg ikke i stand til at gennemskue nogen grund til at diverse cykelstier i og omkring Ribe er skiltet på den ene eller den anden måde og betragter nu disse skilte som i praksis synonyme.
atcomapper (2018-03-03 11:14:20+00:00): Jo, anvendeligheden for andre brugergrupper vil absolut blive reduceret. Et par eksempler:
Rutefinding for registreringspligtige knallerter - som jo ikke må køre på cykelstier.
Det er ikke tilladt at parkere indenfor 5 meter fra udkørslen af en cykelsti. Når forbindelsesstier i enden af villaveje markeres som cykelstier, ser det altså ud som om, at det er ulovligt at parkere for enden af vejen - hvilket som regel ikke er tilfældet.
Der er uden tvivl flere eksempler som jeg ikke lige kan gennemskue, hvilket heller ikke er mit job som data-bidrager.
Hjart (2018-03-03 11:43:09+00:00): Jeg må tilstå at jeg ikke forstår hvorledes rutefinding for registreringspligtige knallerter er relevant her og heller ikke helt eksemplet med parkering ved forbindelsesstier.
Bemærk dog at mange forbindelsesstier mm blev markeret mens vi brugte Fugro og det derfor ofte var svært at vurdere stiers præcise art. Sådanne stier kan det naturligvis være relevant at revidere.
damndog (2018-03-03 20:14:43+00:00): Podobnie jak na ulicy Królewskiej, na placu Wolności dopuszczalny jest ruch kołowy, polecam zapoznać się z zainstalowanymi w tym miejscu znakami drogowymi.
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-04 10:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56866872 where the changeset comment is: revert several changesets by ZHANGPALEX. These changesets contain many deletions, no proper reason was given and the deletions don't match with Bing imagery. Please ask your supervisor why you shouldn't just delete things.
mavl (2018-07-31 15:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61232249 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, fictional data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2119].
abrensch (2019-04-14 17:30:16+00:00): Hallo opendcc,

weisst Du, ob diese Brücke fertig ist:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40748021

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
opendcc (2019-04-14 18:08:43+00:00): Die ist wieder frei, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62441710 ist aber noch zu. Unklar, ob es dieses Jahr was wird.
opendcc (2019-04-14 18:08:57+00:00): Habs eingetragen
Nakaner (2018-03-04 09:41:20+00:00): I have reverted your deletions but kept your additions.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56841483
mueschel (2018-03-05 11:38:37+00:00): Hi,
these relations have a tag "group_1" which doesn't look right - did you forget to change it to another key?

Cheers, Jan
R0bst3r (2018-03-06 07:55:32+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. 
Was ich noch hinzufügen würde, wäre das Tag für einen Kreisverkehr: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction=roundabout. Falls die Mitte überfahrbar ist stattdessen ein highway=mini_roundabout.
Zudem sind im Süden und Osten keine Straßennamen vorhanden. Diese sollte man ergänzen.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56841526
eggie (2018-03-06 10:29:56+00:00): Hier heb je al eerder nog een keer alle adresinfo aan de gebouwen toegevoegd, maar deze staan al op de adresnodes. \dat geeft verwarring in de database. Graag reactie. 
You added duplicated address-info at the buildings. Why?
eggie (2018-03-06 10:32:08+00:00): duplicated addressinfo removed from buildings
BlackstoneI (2018-03-06 10:38:45+00:00): De enige wijzigingen die hier zijn doorgevoerd is het veranderen van de building=construction naar building=house tag aangezien deze imiddels af en bewoond zijn.
eggie (2018-03-06 10:44:38+00:00): Klopt, prima actie.. maar het is een changeset van veel eerder datum. Het viel me op. Je ziet de dubbele adressen nu nog renderen, maar ze zijn inmiddels weg.
In de changeset zag ik je naam staan, maar dat zegt niet altijd wat. 
 Bedankt voor je reactie.
Jakka (2018-03-03 10:07:07+00:00): Deze beide halte staan er fysiek nog ?
Goniometer (2018-03-03 10:08:30+00:00): Yes, they are still exists. This is why the best way to show them would be to label them as "Out of Commission".
Jakka (2018-03-03 10:11:59+00:00): OK. On the main road in OSM I do not find any bus relation any more... Was it before a "belbus" perhaps?
TourenbikerFKB (2018-03-23 22:46:00+00:00): Hallo Harald, warum hast du für die Breite des Radwegs einen negativen Wert (-2) gemappt?
jambamkin (2020-01-17 12:57:15+00:00): Hi Ro, Thanks for your additions to the map, I was wondering why you have chosen to add landuse=residential tags around certain properties such as way/566044331 and way/566046977 when they already reside within way/323692135 are you trying to mark out the boundaries of each property?
Ro Smith (2020-01-24 15:19:12+00:00): I'm a bit of a novice at this so I'm sorry if I've not annotated it correctly. I was trying to put the property boundaries in place. It was my intention to name every property.
jambamkin (2020-01-24 15:31:59+00:00): Awesome, glad to have you on board. I think the correct tag would be use leisure=garden and garden:type=residential. Although I can see how that doesn't quite fit your case here, generally house names go on the buildings rather than the grounds. Have a reason of the wiki and see if it fits https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden
mavl (2018-07-31 15:02:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61232249 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, fictional data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2119].
aharvey (2018-03-05 22:18:15+00:00): Thanks, I've expanded the substation to cover the new area.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:46:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
el_q-bus (2018-03-03 10:09:00+00:00): Informacje zaczerpnięte z Uchwały Rady Gminy Kroczyce nr 221/XXXI/2017 (źródło: http://www.kroczyce.pl/aktualnosci/531).
mavl (2018-07-31 15:01:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61232249 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, fictional data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2119].
map_jay (2018-03-03 10:08:27+00:00): Tesco, not petrol station
literan (2018-03-03 12:23:42+00:00): а вот за эту правку респект, все круто. highway=give_way с direction - это высший пилотаж ) В телеграм-чатик ОСМерский не желаешь присоединиться, кстати?
Pasha Rockof (2018-03-03 16:21:02+00:00): ) набираемся опыта по немногу. Чатится считаю пока рановато, т.к. ещё "не впитал" достаточно словарного запаса на вашем языке сообщества. ) еще не вечер, дружище
BCNorwich (2018-03-03 13:20:51+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Curry Nights is already mapped over the road, so I've removed your incorrectly placed POI putting your wheelchair data on the existing building.
Regards Bernard
Derick Rethans (2018-03-03 12:07:57+00:00): Hi,

why are you adding data that's already there? Now there are lots of duplicates that I now will have to conflate or remove.

I see there are lots of updates through #ICT4society, all with the same problem  — could you put me in contact with the organisers of this event?
Nakaner (2018-03-08 22:46:40+00:00): Hallo MrKrisKrisu,

welcher Quelle hast du denn entnommen, dass die Hannöversche Südbahn von Göttingen über Eichenberg nach Hann. Münden führt?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Derick Rethans (2018-03-03 12:08:45+00:00): Hi,

why are you adding data that's already there? Now there are lots of duplicates that I now will have to conflate or remove.

I see there are lots of updates through #ICT4society, all with the same problem  — could you put me in contact with the organisers of this event?
Derick Rethans (2018-03-03 12:08:57+00:00): Hi,

why are you adding data that's already there? Now there are lots of duplicates that I now will have to conflate or remove.

I see there are lots of updates through #ICT4society, all with the same problem  — could you put me in contact with the organisers of this event?
user_5359 (2018-03-03 16:43:47+00:00): Hello,

Please read the definition of healthcare=audiologist (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audiology). Also i move  the information from the building to a node, because I belive Amelia isn't the only working person in this building. Don't use undefined key like Keyword and hours
mavl (2018-03-04 04:20:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
В этом пакете правок описания объектов и личные заметки были добавлены как наименования объектов. Пожалуйста, не используйте карту OpenStreetMap для личных заметок. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
BCNorwich (2018-03-03 13:07:34+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've placed the building POI data on the building outline, as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.
philippec (2019-12-26 22:08:27+00:00): de aed zit net onder de overkapping
literan (2018-03-03 12:14:41+00:00): зачем создаете дубли уже существующих объектов, да еще и в некорректных местах, в сотняъ метров от истинного? откатить придется все ваши правки
ent8r (2018-03-03 19:16:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56855107 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 56844258 because the user created a note for the wrong building using StreetComplete
BáthoryPéter (2018-03-03 20:29:58+00:00): Szia!
Átnéztem ezt a szerkesztésedet. A megadott adatok rendben vannak, viszont az iskola korábban is rosszul, duplán volt jelölve: külön iskolaként az épület és még egy iskolaként az udvar. Úgy szoktuk csinálni, hogy a teljes iskolát magába foglaló területre rakjuk az iskola jelölést, nevet, stb., az épületre pedig gyakorlatilag semmit.
Javítottam, ha megnézed most szerkesztőben, látni fogod, mire gondolok.
üdv, Péter
Jakka (2018-03-03 18:38:37+00:00):  The Chesterfield is never closed see opening_hours
Jakka (2018-03-03 18:45:26+00:00): Idem GB Express no closing day ?
Jakka (2018-03-03 18:24:26+00:00): Strange on the highway where the busstop are there is no busrelation?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56844344#map=18/50.63486/3.77275&layers=TN
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-04 08:14:34+00:00): Hi ZHANGPALEX, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped highways(paths which are still visible in the used imagery? Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56844482
ZHANGPALEX (2018-03-04 09:00:57+00:00): Hi,pitscheplastsch,
When I started to map on this tile,others have already mapped some features on it,while,in my opinion,MAP means a tool which makes other people to know most of the information of the location,while,For me,I think the map has been marked with too many features,most of these paths,for example,a20or 30 meters long path,or,paths just next to each other,whihc can be viewed as just one path,all of these features will make the map more difficult to read,so ,I delete some of the unnecessary ones.
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-04 10:28:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56866872 where the changeset comment is: revert several changesets by ZHANGPALEX. These changesets contain many deletions, no proper reason was given and the deletions don't match with Bing imagery. Please ask your supervisor why you shouldn't just delete things.
Digne (2018-03-04 09:14:02+00:00): Hallo Jecepede,

Ik zag dat er een aantal keer om feedback was gevraagd. Ik zal ze even allemaal doorlopen. Bij deze heb ik geen op- of aanmerkingen.
Digne (2018-03-04 09:14:31+00:00): Hier lijkt het me ook allemaal in orde.
kempelen (2018-03-04 20:37:27+00:00): Szia!
Jó sok adatot összegyűjtöttél, de ezeket a "leírás" mező helyett tulajdonságokként kellene megadni. A telefonszám, weboldal egyszerűen megadható a "Mező hozzáadása" mellett. Lenyitod és ott felveheted ezeket.

A kártyás fizetésekhez viszont már az "Összes címke" szerkesztésébe kell belemélyedned, itt van például egy ékszerbolt ahol beírták a név-érték párokba a fizetési lehetőségeket, pl payment:mastercard yes.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5448173901

Ha ilyen extra adatokat szeretnél felvenni, akkor bizony el kell majd mélyedni a Wikiben a jelölések tekintetében. wiki.openstreetmap.org

De ha csak néhány boltról lesz szó, akkor jöhet a "leírásba" is, remélve, hogy egyszer majd valaki kijavítja.
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-04 08:12:44+00:00): Hi ZHANGPALEX, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped highways(paths which are still visible in the used imagery? Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56844868
ZHANGPALEX (2018-03-04 09:02:59+00:00): Hi,pitscheplastsch,
When I started to map on this tile,others have already mapped some features on it,while,in my opinion,MAP means a tool which makes other people to know most of the information of the location,while,For me,I think the map has been marked with too many features,most of these paths,for example,a20or 30 meters long path,or,paths just next to each other,whihc can be viewed as just one path,all of these features will make the map more difficult to read,so ,I delete some of the unnecessary ones.
Digne (2018-03-04 09:16:51+00:00): Voor objecten met meerdere namen bestaat er alt_name=*.
BCNorwich (2018-03-03 13:14:51+00:00): Hi, POI data placed on building outline.
Regards Bernard
josmougn (2020-03-18 22:50:36+00:00): Hi, I would like to know what is represented by this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566088177 ? According to the history you made it 2 years ago. Was it a building ? A street ? Cheers
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-04 08:10:08+00:00): Hi ZHANGPALEX, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped highways(paths which are still visible in the used imagery? Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56845158
ZHANGPALEX (2018-03-04 09:01:38+00:00): Hi,pitscheplastsch,
When I started to map on this tile,others have already mapped some features on it,while,in my opinion,MAP means a tool which makes other people to know most of the information of the location,while,For me,I think the map has been marked with too many features,most of these paths,for example,a20or 30 meters long path,or,paths just next to each other,whihc can be viewed as just one path,all of these features will make the map more difficult to read,so ,I delete some of the unnecessary ones.
Nakaner-repair (2018-03-04 09:35:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56866002 where the changeset comment is: Full revert of changeset 56845158. There are too much deletions and I have better things to do than cleaning up after HOT contributors.
Sowa1980 (2019-05-03 20:28:30+00:00): Привет, за чем нужно было удалять и ломать мульти полигон собранный из отношений? Еще раз будет подобное жалоба уйдет в DWG. Надоело выправлять уже за всеми, за чем вы влезли в ту местность которую не знаете и там где было все детально замаплено? Объясните свои действия.
mueschel (2019-05-03 21:21:27+00:00): Sorry,
I don't speak Russian and I don't understand the automatic translation.
As far as I can see, you created these relations and I fixed a spelling mistake a year ago.
Nakaner (2018-03-04 09:33:17+00:00): Please don't delete and redraw features. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56845311
dgitto (2018-03-04 02:30:29+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2018-03-04 02:36:06+00:00): Ho separato il civico dall'edificio.
In Italia agli edifici non si associa in genere un civico. Perché in generale un palazzo può avere molti civici, anche su strade diverse. Dunque meglio metterlo come nodo separato, appartenente o meno al perimetro dell'edificio
BCNorwich (2018-03-03 18:22:17+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
There are no pharmacys at those two locations so I've removed the POI. If you need help adding features please just ask.
Regards Bernard
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:26:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Digne (2018-03-04 09:23:01+00:00): Voor het Olympiaplein zijn er een aantal changesets zie ik. Ik zie dat er een vlak is met enkele karakteristieken over de parkeerplaats en een punt met parkeerfunctie. De parkeerkarakteristieken worden op deze manier niet gepakt. Alle info moet of op het punt of op het vlak. Ik zou zelf het vlak adviseren, dat geeft iets meer informatie dan alleen een punt.
SK53 (2018-03-03 12:49:21+00:00): Can I ask participants in ICT4Society to please add meaningful changeset descirptions? By all means add the hashtag, but this on its own is no earthly use for other contributors. A short description such as "adding details of wheelchair accessibility" (which is what I think you are doing) is much more generally useful.
Digne (2018-03-04 09:25:53+00:00): Zie mijn vorige reactie.
Digne (2018-03-04 09:26:51+00:00): Dit ziet er allemaal goed uit. Ik zou adviseren oneway=no weg te laten. Een weg is standaard tweerichtings, dus dat hoeft niet per se weer benoemd te worden.
user_101460 (2018-03-04 15:34:03+00:00): はじめまして。姫路を中心に活動しているnogajunと申します。
OpenStreetMapにようこそ!
加古川あたりは全然手が回っていないので、OpenStreetMapの編集はとても助かります。ありがとうございます。
さて、OpenStreetMapの良い地図を作るためにいくつかお願いがあります。


# 下絵には「Bing航空画像」ではなく「Japan GSI ortho imagery」(地理院地図)を使う

iDエディタを使って航空画像を使って書く場合は、最初に表示される「Bing航空画像」は位置がズレているので、国土地理院の「Japan GSI ortho imagery」を使ってください。
変更方法は、右側にある「背景地図」アイコンをクリックするか「B」キーを押します。メニューが表示されたら「Japan GSI ortho imagery」を選択すれば切り替わります。
「Bing航空画像」のほうが新しいので、たまにCtrl+Bキーを押して切り替えながら見ると新しくて正確な地図が書けます。

# 建物はまっすぐ、一つ一つきちんと書く

見たところ建物が存在しないところも建物として書いてらっしゃるようです。
iDエディタでは少し書きにくいかもしれませんが、この地図は実際に使われる地図なので、存在しない建物があるととても困ります。
建物を書くのは面倒ですが適当に書かずにきちんと一つ一つ分けて書きましょう。
建物を書いた後は「S」キーを押すと角が90度に揃えられてきれいに書けます。

工場で建物が密集してて書けないという部分は、OSMは無理をする必要はまったくないので書かずに飛ばしてください。OSMに慣れて高度な編集ができるJOSMエディタを使うようになってから書きましょう。

# 建物は道路にくっつけない

OSMのルールでは、道路は「道の中心線に沿って書く」、建物は「建物の輪郭に沿って書く」というルールがあります。
道路は道の中心に線がくるので、建物とくっつくことはありません。
道路については、航空画像と違って正しい位置に無い場合があります。この場合は道路を修正してから建物に道路が重ならないようにしてから書きます。

# 鉄塔は建物ではありません

送電塔を建物として書いていますが、OSMのルールでは送電塔は建物ではなくてポイントとして書きます。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:power%3Dtower
もうすでにポイントとして書いてある部分については書く必要はないので気をつけましょう。

# わからないところはOSM Wikiで確認しよう

OSMの書き方には、上の鉄塔のように細かいルールがあります。
とりあえずわからない事があれば、OSM Wikiを見ると解決することが多いです。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Main_Page
使い方は、右上の検索窓に調べたい物を入力して検索すると、その物について調べられます。


長くなりましたが、OSMでわからないところがあれば気軽にメッセージをください。
よろしくお願いします。
eggie (2018-03-03 15:25:35+00:00): review-request: Zie er strak uit .. je zou evt. de highway= service, service=parking_aisle kunnen intekenen op de parkeerplaats.
Jecepede (2018-03-03 18:54:33+00:00): Aloha !

Hartsikke bedankt voor de tip. Zojuist de 'Rijbaan in parkeergelegenheid' ingetekend :D

Cheeeeeeeeeers

Jecepede
eggie (2018-03-03 20:38:40+00:00): ... Oke... alleen nog even de amenity=parking als node verwijderen anders staat de parking er 2x in. Of een node of een vlak. Doe je het zelf?
Jecepede (2018-03-03 20:43:43+00:00): Verwijderd van het vlak.