piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-10-21 07:41:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip...  Probeer de paden los te houden van de landuse. Winkels graag bijtaggen op de adresnodes . 
Geef concreet aan wat je doet. Dus fietspad omgetagd naar wandelpad.
Welk bord staat vooraan?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-21 07:55:52+00:00): Je aparte bruggen (die zijn er niet) en trottoirs heb ik verwijderd. 
De trottoirs zijn opgenomen in de tagging van de hoofdrijbaan met sidewalk=left / right of both.
Die voetpaden op de brug heb ik aangesloten op de zebra's .. Het routeerde anders niet. Je moet maar eens kijken hoe ik dat heb gedaan. 
Dat was inderdaad geen fietspad.

Veel plezier met mappen. 
eggie
Mahdi0424 (2021-11-04 06:55:52+00:00): سلام. چرا اسامی اشتباه رو برای خیابان ها وارد کردید؟ اسامی محلی در تگ دیگری قرار دارند. لطفا تگ اصلی رو عوض نکنید.
Mahdi0424 (2021-11-04 06:55:03+00:00): سلام. چرا اسامی اشتباه رو برای خیابان ها وارد کردید؟
spiregrain (2021-10-21 11:35:12+00:00): Thanks for this and your other recent correction.   Can I ask - how do you spot them?  I use Osmose, but it did not identify either of these (and it has issued me some false positives too).   Is there a tool you use?
BCNorwich (2021-10-21 16:45:00+00:00): Hi, http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/  tick/untick to show the layer you want. Need any help please just ask.

I regularly look for and correct inadvertent mistakes. Keeps an old codger busy and alert.
spiregrain (2021-10-22 07:44:36+00:00): Thanks!
Johnbo (2022-10-28 09:56:30+00:00): Hola Jesús. ¿Cabe la posibilidad de que hayas confundido a Abderramán III y Al Nasir al establecer la etimología de esta calle?
Jesús Gómez (2022-10-28 11:09:41+00:00): Hola Johnbo. 
Parece que me he confundido. Supuse que la calle hacía referencia a Abderramán III por ser califa de Córdoba pero veo que estaba confundido. 
¿Es entonces este id de wikidata el que debe aparecer: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q284750 ?
Gracias por el aviso.
Johnbo (2022-10-28 12:18:28+00:00): Imagino que sí, que esa es la etiqueta de wikidata del Al-Nasir al que se dedica la avenida. De hecho, Abderramán III tiene su propia calle apenas unos metros al noroeste de la avenida Al-Nasir.

Si te he avisado en lugar de haber hecho yo mismo la corrección, ha sido por si hiciste el cambio como parte de una campaña editando el mismo nombre en distintas ciudades, para que pudieras revisarlo.

Saludos.
Jesús Gómez (2022-10-28 13:30:13+00:00): En cuanto pueda reviso esa edición y lo cambio. Gracias.
pitfire (2021-10-21 10:46:16+00:00): Hallo Michael,
weder die "Hasenbacher Straße(239327468, v10)", noch die 
Hauptstraße (8591757, v54), haben durchgend maxspeed 70!
Beispiel Ortsschild @ 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.849716879386&lng=7.385998420218&z=17&pKey=853120521940634&focus=photo

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.853304506383&lng=7.3667425261702&z=17&pKey=1041733766234552&focus=photo
marczoutendijk (2021-10-21 09:21:48+00:00): DWG revert by:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112781381

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2021-10-21 09:20:17+00:00): DWG revert by:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112781356

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2021-10-21 09:19:02+00:00): DWG revert by: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112781298

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
szydzio (2021-10-22 10:22:27+00:00): Thanks for this edit, the name was indeed fake, used only to "mark the update of the map", while the street has a real name. Greetings!
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:10:35+00:00): Это официальное название вершины? Или она просто похожа на крепость? Если второе, то тег name не используем. Он для официальных названий.
СергейD (2021-10-21 18:15:50+00:00): формально узловая. Первопрохождение оттуда и название. Если у вас есть ссылка на источник на который можно ориентироваться в официальных названия, буду благодарен. В районе поляны к ряду названий на карте OSM у меня вопросы.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 18:49:47+00:00): Ориентироваться при присвоении значения тегу name надо на указатели, таблички и т.п. Если формально это "Узловая", то так и надо писать в тег name. Всё остальное пишется в теги типа alt_name (альтернативное название), loc_name (название, которое используется у местных). Подробнее в вики: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name

Если не лень можно штудировать государственные реестры, например: https://cgkipd.ru/science/names/reestry-gkgn.php

Не следует в name писать названия, используемые в каком-то узком кругу людей, особенно если эти люди сами его и выдумали. Если такое название широко используется у местного населения, то записывается в loc_name.
СергейD (2021-10-22 09:38:19+00:00): Спасибо. Не лень, для КК только названия населенных пунктов в реестре.
skyper (2021-10-22 10:56:32+00:00): Hello SWF8
Why did you remove `ref=*` and `local_ref=*`?
Could you please add the source you use to the CS and use a more meaningful comment than always "PT details". Thanks
Regards skyper
SWF8 (2021-10-22 13:54:11+00:00): Hi skyper.
The 'ref' is still available at the platform_edge. It is not necessary to have it in the relation as well – the relation is only an area but not an public_transport element. The platform_edge ist the public_transport-element an has a ‘ref’.

Regards SWF8
skyper (2021-10-23 12:33:24+00:00): Hi SWF8
Is this new? Is this tagging documented somewhere?
I think the platform still has the ref and according to documentation should be member in the route relations.
I have not problem if the edge also has the identical `ref`.

Take care,
skyper
skyper (2021-10-27 15:54:52+00:00): Hello SWF8,
Please, carefully read :
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=platform
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport=platform
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=platform_edge

All the tags and the route relations and public_transport relations memberships belong to the platform. The platform_edge is optional and can have the identical tags but is no replacement for the platform.

Please, recheck all the platform you have edited and readd the tags. Thanks a lot.

Regards skyper
Gonéo (2021-10-21 09:51:39+00:00): You have requested a review. The change seems correct since the bridge is closed again. The closure should be shorter this time. Please update again when it will open.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:09:09+00:00): Вряд ли тут уместен тег кладбища, так как это единичное место захоронения. Рассмотрите альтернативу https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:historic%3Dtomb
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:13:49+00:00): Зачем нужен тэг substation=yes, если уже указано power=substation?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112781501
Pink Duck (2021-10-21 12:08:01+00:00): This maxspeed is not wrong either. 130 default interpretation is km/h, which it is for a national speed limit. A better correction would have been maxspeed="60 mph" and maxspeed:type="GB:nsl_single"
Zeph Davies (2021-10-21 17:57:41+00:00): The surrounding road has no speed limit, why is just the bridge 130km/h? Does the limit change exactly just for the bridge?
Pink Duck (2021-10-21 19:07:50+00:00): The surrounding road speed limit just hasn't been added yet. Being highway=unclassified the author may have assumed the UK default national 60 mph may have been understood, instead of explicitly adding it in at the time.

You're within rights to change the bridge to "60 mph" if you wish, as that's a closer match to the actual legal limit than 130 km/h.
Pink Duck (2021-10-21 19:16:44+00:00): I suspect the 130 may have some from the OS OpenData used as source for the original import, or the original author was European in mindset ;)
Pink Duck (2021-10-21 12:10:13+00:00): The publicly maintained section of road with speed limit is to where the asphalt changes type to privately-owned developer build. Please restore maxspeed=none tag.
Pink Duck (2021-10-21 12:05:26+00:00): It was wrong to remove the unlimited speed here. This is a private, unadopted road with no signage and no enforceable limit. Only driving without due care/attention is prosecutable here.
kagebar (2023-06-26 12:30:18+00:00): тег name використовується для власних назв, а не для опису типу "Слабый", "Слабый родник" і т.д. Для опису використовуйте тег description
mosstreet (2021-10-21 09:35:24+00:00): Здание или завод территория 
и чего дорожки по зданиям
Thierry1030 (2024-05-12 07:38:24+00:00): Hello, 
This path is part of a hiking relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9060929
Are you sure it's not accessible for pedestrians?
SekeRob (2021-10-21 14:23:52+00:00): Hi,

"for better route calculation"... just to be sure, we don't map what we'd like it to be, rather we map what the signs tell us and the lines on the road (yeah right that part is mostly in our dreams). Think the U turn rule is not indicated and superfluous as routing should already happen via the turn way just before and the only straight already prohibits the u-turn.

cheers

cheers
SekeRob (2021-10-21 14:31:46+00:00): PS Just tested, it completely ignores the no-left turn coming from Guardiagrele to PennaP, it should have taken the shortcut. From PennaP to GuardiaGrele it takes the shortcut, but that did it last night too. You might want to try with No-U-turn, just for testing. No to stay. Maybe there's a delay in the test system getting to learn but it ignoring the only-straight would suggest so.
n34s (2021-10-21 16:01:18+00:00): That's why I added relation 13349219. The motor_vehicle OSRM route calculation behaves exactly as you said. I'll try with restriction=no_u_turn (changeset 112799207) just to see if anything changes. Otherwise I'll remove it in accordance with the pre-existing signs. Respects
abakus_uploader (2021-10-21 22:31:01+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Andrea Musuruane (2021-10-22 07:37:54+00:00): Ciao. amenity=water_point è un  luogo in cui è possibile ottenere grandi quantità di "acqua potabile" per riempire un serbatoio di acqua dolce, come quello che si trova su roulotte, camper e barche. Le case dell'acqua sono dei distributori (a pagamento) dove rifornirsi di acqua refrigerata naturale o gassata. Devono essere inserite in modo analogo a quanto fatto qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1726493213 Ciao, Andrea
IlTia (2021-10-27 07:30:45+00:00): Ciao Andrea, ti ringrazio per la spiegazione. Ho editato il punto.
IlTia (2021-11-18 15:43:48+00:00): Ciao Andrea, onde evitare duplicati o errori, è normale che  non si veda ancora questo luogo? Dovrei averlo editato correttamente l'ultima volta
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-18 15:54:07+00:00): Ciao. E' normale. La mappa di default del sito OSM non visualizza questa tipologia di elementi. Non può visualizzare tutto, altrimenti la mappa diventerebbe inguardabile. Ciao, Andrea
user_5239402 (2021-10-22 02:08:30+00:00): 안녕하세요. 
혹시 동탄의 행정구역을 추가해주실수 있나요?
gwahak (2021-10-22 13:03:28+00:00): 동탄은 법정동 능동이 행정적으로 3갈래로 나뉘어서 동탄3동과 나머지 능동의 문제로 지역으로서의 동탄과 행정동 기준이 달라서 애매하긴 하고 경계도 좀 복잡한데 시간나면 해보겠습니다.
user_5239402 (2021-10-23 08:18:56+00:00): 감사합니다.
porfiriopaiz (2021-10-29 03:51:02+00:00): Hello Zac, this is Porfirio from the Nicaraguan OSM local community.

I'm reviewing some of your changesets and I'm a bit concerned about the imagery used to add the buildings on this changeset and some others, those are misaligned and I think it is because the imagery you are using is somewhat outdated.

Would you mind trying to use the Maxar Premium Imagery, which is up to date?

Kind regards.
Warin61 (2021-10-22 06:41:22+00:00): Hi,

No rolls on ways in relation 13349345, corrected. Also had crossing ways ... corrected using bing that gives more detail detail to tree area.
breno-au (2021-11-06 05:07:48+00:00): Good edit. Thanks.
Warin61 (2021-11-09 09:00:51+00:00): Too much practice. I have been mucking about them them in NSW for ages, fairly sick of them. 
Good Luck.
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-21 08:37:40+00:00): Hi _varman_. Thank you for contributing to OSM. Great job, but there's an issue with water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/995200564) due crossing with highway. I've come across this area and checked the various imagery. The natural waters all look dry, perhaps it's intermittent water or other.  Would you mind rechecking and fixing the issue, please? (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30203/task/143781372). 

I appreciate if you could fix the issue as local mapper rather than me as an armchair mapper.

Thank you.
_varman_ (2022-12-21 22:12:41+00:00): Hi Rizki, You're right. This is an ancient reservoir which now only occasionally fills during monsoons. I have amended to abandoned and intermittent to clarify it's current state. Thanks!
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-22 00:36:25+00:00): Thank you for further clarifying this, the information you provide is very helpful. Please feel free to ask any other questions you may have. Happy mapping!
Jakka (2021-10-22 12:31:45+00:00): There is a double adding of the "Pflanzencenter Lichtenbusch"
Remove the names and add it on the global surface of it
DaveF (2021-10-23 23:23:40+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass is not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.

I've flagged it as an error:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347
Sheila Job (2021-10-25 06:24:30+00:00): Hi Lidia, i just saw two unsquared building, one building you drew where there is no house. Thanks for mapping please keep going
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112785306
Dimacn (2021-10-21 13:43:47+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, почему лавочки вы отмечаете как парки отдыха? Пожалуйста исправьте. 2. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные имена собственные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Не должно быть таких названий как "Лавочка", "Детская площадка". Пожалуйста удалите эти названия.
chlenix (2021-10-21 11:46:23+00:00): Здравствуйте, имя у площади "Соборна", открыта она весь день. Исправьте, пожалуйста
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112785787
chlenix (2021-10-21 22:01:27+00:00): это не парк, имя не верное, часы работы неверные.
правка отменена, изучайте вики
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112785787
AkuAnakTimur (2021-10-21 13:57:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282430691

Pusat Pembiayaan Automobil ~ Финансирование автомобилей

Не является "отделением" банка

(Машинный перевод - Ответить мне на английском языке)
Dmitriev_DA (2021-10-22 03:35:08+00:00): Hello. I only edited the tags as suggested to fix OSM
AkuAnakTimur (2021-10-22 15:02:21+00:00): Sometimes you must be careful with automated fix suggestions. Can be true, also can be false.
vakal (2021-10-21 14:27:25+00:00): I see that you removed a lot of nodes and then reverted the change. What was the reason for the deletion in the first place? Just curious as I find many of the deleted nodes relevant.
pangoSE (2021-10-21 21:37:10+00:00): See https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmsweden/posts/6302516933152787/?__cft__[0]=AZVDuMUJqrUxaHdm0CzM_PrdPs6ulq-i4fA-oc2ieLEQmM5l-HD8C_c8hwUJw_yb_1bFXZ9gGi5GrO6Az5-xgsmT6wwwWAVA-3gBemkX6OYRHylhGuVvvvNBhhsiESjzsiTFnOUpPQ2VhCqYZT_4XOgySwhGF7Cy4rCLF-P7SOdXTv79bykbRSnOisWK5tG3vXc&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R
Really I did it because it is annoyng to edit ways with a lot of nodes in JOSM (hard to select the way) and because we often use bad data sources so the extra nodes just waste space.
vakal (2021-10-22 16:20:56+00:00): Ok, it's acceptable to simplify if the removed nodes are inaccurate. If the reason is easier to edit less complex ways or for the sake of saving space we should be careful. If more lightweight data is required for some application the data should be extracted from the OSM database and then simplified instead. Thanks for reverting the edit!
chlenix (2021-10-21 11:47:42+00:00): такие названия не нужно давать, это общие данные, которые и так понятны из тегов
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112786177
chlenix (2021-10-21 21:58:44+00:00): правка отменена, изучите теги на вики
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112786177
eggie (2021-10-21 11:17:20+00:00): Dag vossie.. Je vraagt feedback.. Tja soms verandert er wel eens wat.

Probeer wel zo'n vlak los te houden van de wegen en paden.
Ik heb wat losgemaakt. Waar loopt eigenlijk die highway=track die rond het terrein ligt? Is die er nog wel?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-21 11:21:51+00:00): Is die woonboot er nog die nu in het midden van het water ligt of is dat een mooring=private die ergens langs de kant hoort?
Het is een kadasteradres, maar niet de vorm van de ark.
Wellicht weet jij hoe het zit?
Ik heb er even een mooring=private van gemaakt en langs de kant gelegd.
eggie
chlenix (2021-10-21 11:48:55+00:00): Яхт-клуб это не парк. Изучите теги в вики перед тем как их использовать
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112786301
chlenix (2021-10-21 21:57:38+00:00): Правка отменена
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112786301
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:01:40+00:00): Орфографию в name поправьте.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112786404
urbalazs (2022-02-04 12:14:54+00:00): Kijavítottam az előző rajzolásodat. Nem szabad az utcán sávonként külön vonalat rajzolni, hanem az egyetlen vonalnak kell megadni a sávtulajdonságait. Nem kell továbbá két részre bontani az utat a járdaszigetnél, hanem a gyalogátkelőnek a tulajdonsága, hogy van-e járdasziget vagy nincs. Fontos, hogy nem úgy kell rajzolni, hogy a megjelenítőben szép legyen, hanem úgy, hogy mások is tudják használni a térképet, és az útvonaltervezők is örüljenek. Ha kérdéseid lennének a szerkesztéssel kapcsolatban, akkor keress nyugodtan.
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 16:00:22+00:00): И с форматом указания номера телефона тоже ознакомьтесь https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112786665
eggie (2021-10-21 12:25:38+00:00): Lijkt me prima zo..
gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-21 12:17:40+00:00): Tip.. Let op.. bij schuyiven met de kaart kun je al snel per abuis adresnodes verplaatsen omdat je selecteert en schuifr met de linker muisknop.
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112786904
Wenenpromenade 140 ligt nu in het voetgangersgebied.
gr eggie
luiswoo (2021-10-21 11:42:50+00:00): Зебре вместо перехода — неточность, а это просто удаление данных, то, что рядом построили надземный переход — не более, чем информация для сведения.
yaKonovalov (2021-10-21 11:54:25+00:00): Не понимаю, что Вы имеете ввиду.
Я нарисовал следующим пакетом новый переход.
eggie (2021-10-21 12:21:36+00:00): Tip letop.. Dit zijn geen parkeerterreinen. Daarom aanvullen met parking=street_side en parking:orientation=perpendicular

De P'trenderen dan wat minder prominent.

aangepast..

eggie
pelekPL (2021-10-21 11:15:07+00:00): Zapomniałem dodać opisu: Poprawa adresacji (cz. 2/2)
Truchin (2022-01-05 12:57:32+00:00): Ce n'est pas une aire piétonne d'après l'arrêté 2018P10661 - seuls les véhicules à moteur sont interdits
Ser9ei (2021-10-21 15:58:51+00:00): Ознакомьтесь с форматом указания рабочего времени https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:opening_hours
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112787230
aceman444 (2023-07-11 18:57:58+00:00): Hi, please pay attention, on a living_street the speed isn't 50kph thus no maxspeed:type=SK:urban. Also please add the maxspeed value, as without 'maxspeed' tag the 'maxspeed:type' tag is useless.
Filip009 (2023-07-23 06:41:53+00:00): StreetComplete bohužiaľ pridáva len tag SK:urban alebo SK:rural, tag maxspeed nepridá :/
aceman444 (2023-07-24 15:33:46+00:00): Mate pravdu, lebo sa rozhodli, ze je to problemove: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/discussions/5131 . Ale v sucasnosti je to v rozpore s wiki, tak uvidime ako sa to vyvinie.
MxxCon (2021-10-21 22:17:42+00:00): Yes, it's blatantly obvious that "you updated info". Please write more descriptive comments as explained in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112787318
tonyf1 (2021-10-22 06:17:36+00:00): Hi, your changeset comment is not detailed enough. You did more than this. You extended 2 ways further south, you changed unclassified ➜ service. What is your source of information? Did you go there? Inside? Just satellite imagery?
guebosch (2021-12-15 16:31:03+00:00): Hi, bist du dir sicher, dass piste:grooming=classic richtig ist?
Sollte es nicht piste:grooming=classic+skating sein?

LG Günther
santon (2021-12-15 20:03:04+00:00): Hallo Günther, ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass die Klassifizierung nicht stimmt. Warum? Ich habe mit dem Zuständigen des Tourismusbüros gesprochen und wir sind überein gekommen, dass wir gemeinsam alle Wintersportangebote komplett überarbeiten. Er stellt in den nächsten paar Tagen die offiziellen Tracks der Loipenspurgeräte zur Verfügung. Ich habe als Vorarbeit Mitte Oktober unsinnige Definitionen gelöscht: doppelte übereinanderliegende Loipen, falsche Namen etc. Siehe auch die Kommentare zu Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/47.4185564/13.6767930
guebosch (2021-12-16 06:38:49+00:00): Hallo Anton,
danke für deine Antwort. Spitze, dass du diese Überarbeitung durchführst. Ich habe auf div. Sites wie opensnow und openski festgestellt, dass die Daten nicht stimmten. Falls du mir Bescheid geben möchtest, wenn "alles" fertig ist, dann könnte ich gerne etwas testen. LG Günther
santon (2021-12-25 10:45:01+00:00): Hallo Günther,
wir haben losgelegt und ein paar Loipen schon nach den Tracks der Liopenspurgeräten gezeichnet. Beispiele: Standardsloipe Ost aber noch ohne den Anteil im Ort. Der Zuständige im Tourismusbüro wird jetzt vermutlich ein paar Tage nicht im Büro sein - ich vermute er macht das nicht ehrenamtlich.
Aber ein anderes Thema: Ich habe mich mal dem ziemlich schrecklichen Zustand der Winterwanderwege und Schneeschuhtouren angenommen. Die Panoramarunde und Kulmbergrunde ist angefangen, aber da sind die Tracks des Tourismusbüros so schlecht, dass vieles unklar bleibt. Bist du vor Ort? Wie werden die Winterwege über Wiesen vorbereitet? Durch Maschinen gewalzt? Dann könnte ich mal beim Tourismusbüro anfragen. Wenn es eher Trampelpfade sind, muss man sie frei Schnauze legen, hauptsache die Kreuzungen stimmen einigermaßen. Kannst du an einigen Stellen Fotos machen oder selber abgehen? Dann würde ich dir ein paar Stellen nennen. Oder bist du mehr auf Langlaufski unterwegs  :-) ?
Herzliche Grüße und ein frohes Weihnachtsfest
Anton