piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 01:37:12+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55326937
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 01:37:27+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55326991
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
user_5359 (2018-01-10 20:37:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

I assumed you forgot a shop=mobile_phone.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:46:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-01-10 16:33:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-01-10 20:54:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsubstation
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:48:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:07:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
chnav (2018-01-23 11:03:38+00:00): Пожалуйста не рисуйте такие зигзаги.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 02:24:37+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55327239
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 02:25:30+00:00): I suspect the correct name would be "Oologah Rural Water Department".
user_5359 (2018-01-10 20:30:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Please read also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site
R0bst3r (2018-01-10 17:43:27+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55327348
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 18:57:16+00:00): Hallo Joshua,

Ziet eruit als een correct getagd park (als een laag over het landuse heen). Top!

Wat je nog zou kunnen doen is het park voorzien van een naam (name=Woldpark). Dat maakt het natuurlijk wel af :).

Tevens zie ik nog een verdwaalde node zonder tags links bovenin bij De Gordiaan. Misschien kun je die nog even weggooien?

Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55327381

Vriendelijke groet,
Mark
Joshua Breeschooten (2018-01-10 21:27:59+00:00): Hallo Captain,

Bedankt voor het checken. Ik had niets door van de verdwaalde node, die is bij deze ook weg. De naam van het park is ook toegevoegd.

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Joshua Breeschooten
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 21:33:47+00:00): Hallo Joshua,

Super!

Ik heb soms ook wel eens zo een verwaalde node (als je per ongeluk ergens hebt geklikt zonder het door te hebben). Meestal geeft JOSM dan een validatie waarschuwing dat er een node is zonder tags als je wil gaan uploaden.

Helemaal rechts onderin komt er dan een uitroepteken te staan onder het kopje 'Validatieresultaten'. 

Groeten,
Mark
Chetan_Gowda (2018-01-10 17:16:28+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55327385
spjaquish (2018-01-10 17:25:28+00:00): Hi Chetan_Gowda!
Thank you for your comment, and for taking the time to review my changset!
Your feedback is very appreciated :D
Happy mapping! 
Regards,
Spencer
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:15:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:36:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Constable (2018-01-10 17:47:15+00:00): Ciao, la SAMAR ha chiuso?
Constable (2018-01-18 10:18:18+00:00): ok, deduco che la SAMAR non ha chiuso, però mappata così non va bene, il nodo deve essere sopra ll'edificio all'interno del quale si trova l'attività, spostalo dov'era prima per favore
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 02:30:52+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55327712
Luuuddooo (2018-07-27 08:56:29+00:00): Bonjour, je n'ai pas trouvé de chemin à cet endroit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5331528534 il n'y a qu'une foret inaccessible
Voirie_3M (2018-07-30 09:44:06+00:00): Merci pour l'info.
C'est un chemin public tout le long (pas de parcelle). 
J'irai voir ou commence la partie non aménagée, dans sa partie nord. Si les riverains me laissent passer :)
R0bst3r (2018-01-10 17:42:40+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55327781
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 02:31:15+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55327820
user_5359 (2018-01-10 20:26:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
lakedistrict (2018-01-11 06:21:36+00:00): Did you mean to put any tags on this node?
ds47uk (2018-01-11 08:57:02+00:00): This was supposed to have been deleted. Hatton Gallery added as an artwork, since there is not a specific art gallery logo
lakedistrict (2018-01-11 09:19:23+00:00): Thanks for the reply. Best not to just 'tag for the renderer' with the incorrect tags, but to request rendering of art galleries at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues. I'll probably remap it as a separate building at some point when I update the map around campus.
ds47uk (2018-01-11 13:52:08+00:00): OK thanks. Surprised it wasn't already on! I had to use G$$gle to find out where it was!
user_3022894 (2018-01-10 17:02:31+00:00): sorry, da fehlte der Link zum Changeset des Users! Hier ist er: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55209691
freebeer (2018-01-10 20:03:48+00:00): ciao constable,
are you sure about this?
TIGER 2017 still has the possessive form.
not that i believe it, but i wonder what source the anonymous contributor had and how you verified it.
it's dangerously close to our returned ex-kimberly fan who has admitted to sourcing google maps in the past, and appears to still be doing so around the same areas I'm editing.
grazie!
(no, I've not checked any other sources meself)
Constable (2018-01-10 20:13:16+00:00): Hi there, thanks for your message. I didn't know he used gmaps as a source in the past. I just decided to trust the anonymous user and do not double check it somewhere else, but after reading your message I've pretty much changed my mind.
Feel free to revert my edit.
Thanks
freebeer (2018-01-11 07:05:43+00:00): mornin'
I think you cautioned another mapper about his suggestions a while back.
He appears to be limiting the notes now to annoying notifications of genuine issues, sometimes difficult to decipher, sometimes out of OSM control.
But there are still lingering older suggestions I'm challenging.
I'm curious what gmaps has here, and if any street-level imagery is legally available...  (but that means work I'd have to do)
I won't revert, as I'm positive there are lots of other gmaps easter eggs or errors that are imported, and I have no evidence so far for a revert.
Plus I've been up through the night and I almost think I can see the sky today...
Interestingly, the notes abuser in Freiburg/Br. just got a suspension, and has reacted not dissimilar to how ex-kimbo reacted upon finding florinbadita_telenav's Kim question, so I wonder if it's something in the air pushing both over the edge.
me, I'm that way all the time.
have a happy day adding pokeponds, pokeparks, and whatever else the increasingly demanding pokemappers-by-notes ask for today ;-)
Constable (2018-01-11 07:58:07+00:00): I think I'll stick with "Kristy's", lesson learned.
I've been doing some research but I couldn't find a clear answer to this issue, let's trust TIGER then.
cheers
Hjart (2018-01-10 17:08:37+00:00): Du kom til at rykke en node i jernbanen, så jeg ruller lige dette tilbage
AshlyAsh (2018-01-10 21:07:21+00:00): Jeg passer bedre på i fremtiden
Hjart (2018-01-10 21:08:20+00:00): Mange tak
user_5359 (2018-01-10 20:14:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you destroy the existing building and mark the whole property as building?
jharpster (2018-01-11 18:45:38+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55328239
literan (2018-01-10 23:22:18+00:00): вы же сами ее и удалили: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5306710003/history - и восстановили зачем-то снова с кривыми тегами. Адреска на точках не нужна. И НЕ НАДО ОРАТЬ.
Geometry-рф (2018-01-11 09:16:39+00:00): literan, надо же, а я и не заметила, что сама удалила)) спасибо, ваше мнение было очень полезным
neuhausr (2018-02-01 16:15:20+00:00): Hi, I have a couple concerns about your edits in this changeset. First you have created a number of residential landuse areas which cover significant parts of lakes--it would be better to limit this kind of way to areas where people actually live. Maybe you are planning to go back later and clean this up? Also, to the east of Eagle Lake you created another lake with an island that does not use the multipolygon relation as it should. I have commented already on some of your past changesets about this issue. You have done over 2000 changesets, it is something very useful you should learn.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 02:31:35+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55328444
user_5359 (2018-01-10 20:09:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  You paint two footways as a closed way, without any connection with other streets, one go through a building??? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway before a second try!
GinaroZ (2018-01-10 19:33:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for tagging it as a doctors - I've also added a building=yes tag :)
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 18:24:31+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 18:38:38+00:00): Hallo Stanleur,

Je hebt hier een leisure=park polygon getekend over de landuse heen. Dat is de correct manier van het aanleggen van een park.

Ik heb echter het idee dat het deel wat je nu hebt getagd als park onderdeel is van een veel groter park (het gebied waar de vijvers Ijzeren Man in liggen).

Overigens hebben parken doorgaans ook een naam.

Verder heb je nog een leisure=pitch node geplaatst. Over het algemeen worden leisure=pitch als area getekend. Tevens worden ze ook voorzien van de betreffende sport. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch 

In het geval van bijvoorbeeld een tafeltennistafel is een node prima.

Parkedits liggen momenteel onder een vergrootglas vanwege de zogenaamde 'Pokemon edits'. 

Graag reactie.

Vriendelijke groet,
Mark
stanleur (2018-01-10 18:42:24+00:00): Hoi Mark,

klopt inderdaad naar mijn mening is het park veel groter. Omdat er stond om kleine delen per keer te doen. dacht ik ik doe voor de eerste keer dit en dan ga ik steeds meer park maken. De sporten zal ik zo direct invoeren. bedankt voor de hulp!

met vriendelijke groet,
Stan
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 18:48:41+00:00): Hallo Stan,

Dankjewel voor je reactie.

Een leisure=park ligt over het hele park heen. Dus niet meerdere leisure=park aanbrengen over elk grasveldje :).

Een mooi voorbeeld vind je hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6314805

Zoals je ziet ligt er één laag over het hele park heen.

Mapse verder! Mocht je nog vragen hebben kun je altijd een berichtje sturen.

Groeten,
Mark
stanleur (2018-01-10 18:52:45+00:00): Hoi Mark,
Ik heb het park vergroot en de randen zo goed mogelijk meegepakt. Ziet het er nu al beter uit? wat hielden de pokemonedits in?

Groetjes Stan
Captain_Spork (2018-01-10 20:19:43+00:00): Ha Stan,

Ik weet niet of je bekend bent met het spel Pokemon Go? Dit spel maakt tegenwoordig gebruik van OSM data. Er zijn nu dus vele Pokemon Go spelers die veranderingen aanbrengen in OSM. Soms is er zelfs sprake van moedwillig schade aanbrengen (dingen aanbrengen die niet bestaan zoals vijvers en parken) om zodoende een voordeel te verkrijgen in het spel. In de meeste gevallen gaat het echter om edits die niet kloppen door onwetendheid.

Wat we proberen is om nieuwe mappers zo goed mogelijk op weg te helpen en te begeleiden. Het uiteindelijke doel is natuurlijk om met zijn allen een zo goed mogelijk kloppende kaart te maken.

Op het forum kun je overigens meer informatie vinden over allerlei onderwerpen. Zie https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Je kunt er zelf ook berichten plaatsen. Aanmelden kan je met OSM account (is gekoppeld aan het forum).

Groeten,
Mark
viloan (2018-01-10 17:26:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-01-10 20:03:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?

If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead.
user_5359 (2018-01-10 19:59:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your firestation node from the street to main building! a firestation isn't a part of the street!
maraf24 (2018-01-10 18:30:07+00:00): Proszę nie zmieniać dróg osiedlowych oraz dojazdowych na drogi prowadzące do lasów i pól.
user_5359 (2018-01-10 19:57:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
berndw (2018-01-12 12:46:13+00:00): Hallo JoGut
Verfallende Gebäude sollte man nicht mit regulären Tags für existierende taggen.
Verwendbar wäre building=ruins
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building?uselang=de

Nicht mehr existierende Gebäude könnte man mit historic=* erfassen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name?uselang=de

Beschreibende Namen die aus anderen Tags ergeben sollte man auch vermeiden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name?uselang=de

Ansonsten stehe ich für Fragen zur Verfügung
JoGut (2018-01-13 16:48:26+00:00): Danke @berndw. 
Ich wusste nicht das sie existieren, werde es bald andern.
wernerhxxx (2019-01-29 16:23:13+00:00): Das Gelände habe ich mir heute angesehen. Bin eine halbe Stunde durchs Unterholz gekrochen.

Gebäude gibt es keine! 2  kaum sichtbare Fundamente. Es war nicht ein großes Gebäude, sondern 2 kleine. Heute alles terrassenförmig eingeebnet mit Baumbestand. Sprengschutzmauer noch vorhanden  (jetzt als Mauer gemappt), ebenso das Pumpenhaus (als Gebäude gemappt.
Die nach 60 Jahren kaum noch als solche erkennbare (Bäume) Tongrube als Hangabbruch (Klippe) gemappt und benannt. 

Die Gebäude- und Industriegebietumrisse habe ich vorläufig erhalten, jedoch auf abandoned gesetzt. Von mir aus können die auch weg.
@JoGut, danke für den Fehler (ohne Ironie), mal wieder was über meine Heimat gelernt. Vor Jahrzehnten bei Mannesmann Feuerfest Feriengejobt. Jetzt weiß ich wo der Rohstoff herkam.
JoGut (2019-01-29 16:35:51+00:00): Schön das du da warst. 
Ich wohne direkt am Waldeingang und hätte dir noch einiges zeigen können. Ja von dem großen Brecherhaus mit dem Seilbahnmaschinenhaus und den Unterkünften die zu finden ist schwierig da das Fundament auf der gegenüberliegenden Seite ist und durch Erosion vom Hang zerstört ist. Und ganz ehrlich eine halbe Stunde reicht kaum aus. Als wir das Gelände umgekrempelt haben und noch die Seilbahntrasse ausgemacht haben waren wir 4 Stunden unterwegs. Hast du eigentlich den kleinen Sprengbunker gefunden?
Reza_koulivand (2018-01-22 13:55:48+00:00): سلام،بیزحمت ویرایشای منو ویرایش نکنید،چون بی دلیل ویرایش نکردم، بیشتر دقت کنید، با id ویرایش کنید تا تاریخ ادیت و gpx رو مشاهده کنید