piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MikeAus (2015-08-06 08:32:44+00:00): When I visited there 2 years ago, the only signpost at the turnoff had written in it "Lookout - 50m" (i.e. 50 metres).
  - has this changed ?
aharvey (2015-08-06 09:30:00+00:00): I'm not sure if it's changed.

What you describe seems to indicate that the lookout is 50m from the sign, which is informative, rather than forming part of the name. The name tag should just contain the actual name, ie. "Eagles Nest Lookout".

What do you think?
MikeAus (2015-08-06 12:14:35+00:00): If I need to direct someone to this lookout in an emergency, it's no good saying "Take the turnoff to Eagles Nest Lookout". 
     But if I say "take the turnoff Lookout 50m", they will know they are at the correct turnoff.
aharvey (2015-08-08 08:07:03+00:00): Perhaps http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign would be better suited then, it allows you to capture the information about the "Lookout 50m" better. You could also put in the description tag of the lookout a note about the "Lookout - 50m" sign.

The reason I'm making such a fuss about it is because I'm pulling data out of OSM with names of lookouts and I only want the name, no other descriptive information.
MikeAus (2015-08-08 11:36:22+00:00): The need of the Emergency Services I work with, is for OSM to enable quick, error-free navigation to an incident. If the sign says "Lookout 50m", then that's what needs to appear on the map.
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:48:51+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196674418
has no tags. What is it?
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-05 06:18:23+00:00): Hier wurde Access=Destination gesetzt. Das ist mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit falsch und verhindert in der Theorie das Durchfahren mit dem Rad oder gar das einfache Durchgehen.
Typischerweise ist Vz260 mit Anlieger frei beschildert. Das entspricht motor_vehicle=Destination. Ggfs Verkehrzeichentool benutzen https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
Bitte um Prüfung und Korrektur
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-05 06:19:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53507990
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
SomeoneElse (2020-01-21 22:47:12+00:00): Hello Nicho Pratama,
I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 7 years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2071089951/history was added with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.
If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
Minh Nguyen (2017-07-04 21:05:30+00:00): While “CHP Officer John Pedro Memorial Highway” may be signposted in a few spots, it isn’t signposted prominently or frequently enough for general usage. Changeset 50044505 moves it to the official_name tag and restores “Cabrillo Highway”, which is the legislatively defined name for the entire stretch of freeway.

Incidentally, this specific name came up as an argument for eliminating highway names entirely while testing navigation software at Mapbox. That would be unfortunate, because the name tag is where you also find “Pacific Coast Highway” and the like.
stevea (2017-07-05 08:49:25+00:00): Really, Minh?  OK, if you think this is more correct.  Are you sure you're not checking on many of or all my edits since 2009?  I do live here and see the signs (I was just driving this stretch of highway TODAY), but if you want to "localize" this and call the whole stretch Cabrillo Highway The Cabrillo Highway, OK, you got it.  And "official_name"?  Is that something you coined?
Minh Nguyen (2017-07-05 09:09:57+00:00): Haha, no, I’m not stalking you! :-D A coworker of mine pointed out how the Mapbox Navigation SDK was trying to say, “Continue on CA 1, CHP Officer John Pedro Memorial Highway, for 14 miles”. It took almost 7 seconds to say this mouthful, and the corresponding label in the UI shrank to a tiny font just to fit it all in there.

You’re right that the signs bearing Officer Pedro’s name are posted along the highway, but it’s not nearly as frequent as the Highway 1 shield, is it?

The official_name tag is… official:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:official_name
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/official_name

Back in 2012, Foursquare switched to OSM, and a prominent Foursquare superuser had only nice things to say – except the unwieldy official names I had placed on the map, especially “Staff Sergeant Matt Maupin Veterans Memorial Freeway”. It was then that I finally came around to using the official_name tag:

https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20120321012448/http://aboutfoursquare.com/after-just-three-weeks-foursquare-launches-major-improvements-to-their-maps/

An alternative to putting Officer Pedro’s name on the highway would be to map the signs themselves as historic=memorial POIs.
stevea (2017-07-05 09:32:26+00:00): So, am I understanding you to say is that tagging what the signs say is "wrong" (or less right than"on the ground verifiable") and that what the name tag SHOULD say for corporate consumers of OSM data (like Mapbox and Foursquare...) is what corporate consumers of OSM data like Mapbox and Foursquare WANT it to say?  Even when "lowly" users like me not in the know how OSM data "might" be used by its corporate consumers?

Gee, that seems odd.
Minh Nguyen (2017-07-05 10:15:02+00:00): No, that’s not at all what I’m saying. Just to be clear, I believe we’re talking about these signs:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/navymailman/5637080430

As opposed to these signs, which I think do call for using the name tag:

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/t/sign-pacific-coast-highway-california-52305409.jpg

The difference is that it isn’t practical to identify the highway by “CHP Officer John Pedro Memorial Highway”. Not only is the name unusually long, but it’s also posted too sparsely for someone to use on the ground. If someone comes in from Riverside Dr. and leaves on Green Valley, they’ll never see this name:

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/wSEpEKjppPynptwQrp6XvA

If we use the name tag, a user of OSM-based navigation software (corporate or otherwise) might well miss a turn trying to get onto Highway 1.

My suggestion (and what I ended up doing in changeset 50044505) was to move Officer Pedro’s name to the official_name tag. A renderer, geocoder, or router can choose to make use of official_name. In fact, several applications do use this tag. Perhaps they give official names more appropriate treatment when they’re in the official_name tag:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/official_name#projects

Finally, please don’t interpret my remarks here as a sort of corporate takeover. I’m still a volunteer mapper by night, even if I happen to work by day on software that relies on OSM. (For the record, I was working elsewhere on non-OSM software in 2012.) I brought up Mapbox because I’m sensitive to how OSM is used in the real world and want to ensure that ultimately end users are best served by the choices we make here. I hope we agree on that point.
Minh Nguyen (2017-07-05 10:19:41+00:00): Incidentally, the Mapbox Navigation SDK is open source, and so is the routing software that powers it:

https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/
https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-navigation-ios/

I understand that it’d be inappropriate to tailor our mapping to any particular router, but we still need to take into consideration the needs of data consumers (and end users) in general.
stevea (2017-07-05 18:37:09+00:00): Thanks for the detailed explanation, Minh, though I believe you walk a very fine line here.
Rui Oliveira (2016-08-24 15:07:35+00:00): Topolositania, podes explicar esta mudança da EN 2 para secundária? Além disso que recomendações OSM referes? Não me lembro de ver uma conversa sobre este tema na comunidade. Além disso existe uma certa discussão na comunidade se devemos ou não mudar as estradas descontinuidas pela estradas de portugal para alçada da camara, de primary para secundary.  https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-pt@openstreetmap.org/msg01249.html
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 10:28:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2071575161/history has shop = petrol that was added in this edit
is it a fuel station? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel

Or is it a shop selling botled petrol? Maybe as a fuel?
Matija Nalis (2023-04-01 00:19:29+00:00):  Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?
k127 (2023-04-07 18:38:04+00:00): Hi Matija Nalis,

please kindly add some links to the objects in concern, so I can review.

As the comment states, this changeset relates to task 117 of the HOT-OSM tasking manager. Did you look up the desciption there?

Best,
k127
Matija Nalis (2023-03-30 19:35:47+00:00): Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ?
woodpeck (2018-01-24 07:14:05+00:00): Hallo, Du hast hier einen Weg angelegt mit dem Namen "106". Wo kommt dieser Name her, hast Du den selbst vor Ort von einem Schild abgelesen oder könnte es sein, dass der aus einer anderen Karte kommt?
Gerhard M (2017-07-04 07:06:38+00:00): The company Archides Uhren moved one house further. The new address is: 
Neutorstraße 19/2-1.
I can't delete this listing. So please update it. 
Cheers, Gerhard Messerkinger (Archides Uhren)
IdealChain (2017-07-04 14:24:35+00:00): Done. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50035975)
Myazyk (2021-02-13 11:39:05+00:00): Ви впевнені, що це аж храм пророка Іллі на горі 1185 м., а не проста капличка?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-02 18:46:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196953049/history has sport = team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well? It seems that sport=team_handball and sport=handball refer to the same thing and second is used more widely while not being worse.
trigpoint (2019-10-31 13:02:14+00:00): Hi, not sure if you are still active but some of your tags are causing issues and confusion to map users.
For example you have tagged Friars Close with motor_vehicle=no, this seems unlikely as it would prevent residents reaching their properties. What was the source of this tagging?
Cheers Phil
chnav (2015-02-08 06:58:01+00:00): название дороги именно "подъезд от м5 к г.Оренбург" , а не М5. Неверная трактовка внутренней документации Росавтодора. М5 надо убрать, чтобы люди не смеялись.
soshial (2020-04-14 19:09:57+00:00): Labdien, Raiti. Es pamaniju, ka jus pielikat visas viensetas ar so izmainu. Kuru avotu tolaik izmantojat, jo sis saraksts nav pilns un pirms 7 gadiem ari pilns nebija :) Varbut, mes varam so papildinat vai izdzest un uzlikt visus pa jaunam?
richlv (2020-05-08 20:21:20+00:00): Dzēst noteikti nevajadzētu, bet papildināt būtu brīnišķīgi.
Droši vien vislabāk apspriest epasta listē talk-lv.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-06-10 20:36:06+00:00): Hi JMcA, why you added ways/lines with no tags, but only name ? If this is intended to be printed text, you need further tags. Best wishes, KR, Alex
fs_LT (2026-05-28 12:31:09+00:00): was soll das sein? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197194476
Rori (2026-05-30 16:46:21+00:00): weiß nicht worum es geht. wenn ich auf den link klicke bin ich mitten im wald und sehe dort nichts. wenn es müll ist, einfach löschen.
fs_LT (2026-06-01 12:18:46+00:00): habs entfernt
Rori (2026-06-02 22:10:20+00:00): super, danke
GerdP (2015-11-04 14:55:29+00:00): Bitte prüfen:
Es gibt in OSM 16 Wege mit dem Tag
highway=pre-proposed
Manche laufen parallel zu z.B. highway=primary
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32694741
andere "auf der grünen Wiese":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32695443
Was soll das Tag aussagen?
Nibbler (2015-11-04 18:21:47+00:00): Hallo,

dort war/ist eine Ortsumgehung geplant. Inkl. Ausbau der Straße auf 2+2 und großem Kreisverkehr.

Durch die Finanzkrise wurde erstmal alles auf Eis gelegt. Darum hab ich damals die Tags so geändert, dass es erstmal nicht sicher ist (Straße=Vorplanung) aber die Daten nicht verloren gehen.

MfG
GerdP (2015-12-19 07:02:09+00:00): Ich habe jetzt mal bei den Wegen mit highway=pre-proposed bzw. preproposed 
das highway=xxx entfernt und ein 
jeweils note_2="was tagged highway=xxx" 
ergänzt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-08 22:47:30+00:00): What https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197295741/history is supposed to represent? Shallow water?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-11 13:35:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2076003857 - czy Kopiec Krakusa występje jako nazwa obszaru większego od samego kopca i niezależnej od ulicy tak nazwanej?

Odnosi się do terenu niezamieszkałego wokół kopca (wtedy trzeba by przesunąć) czy do terenu zamieszkałego (wtedy trzeba by tag zmienić na chyba place=neighbourhood)

(trafiłem na to bo poprawiam place=locality na lepsze tagi tam gdzie to możliwe)
Władysław Komorek (2021-01-11 13:41:02+00:00): Miałem to miejsce wtedy na WMS'ie Krakowa. Lokalnie to mówi się że mieszka koło Kopca Krakusa.
slodki (2016-06-14 16:54:51+00:00): a skąd to? Czy przypadkiem nie chodzi o sąsiednią ulicę?
Władysław Komorek (2016-06-20 07:38:16+00:00): Nazwa okolicy.
eggie (2018-10-01 20:35:05+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, maar nog nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog  Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Polarbear (2016-12-31 15:36:27+00:00): Weder ein youth_centre noch ein center, sondern eine Gruppenunterkunft fuer 40 Jugendliche. tourism=hostel, jetzt auf dem Grundstueck.
Phyks (2019-07-30 11:09:46+00:00): Bonjour,

Ce lot de modifications a ajouté des toilettes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2076413205. Aujourd'hui, je ne les retrouve pas sur le terrain.

Sont-ce des toilettes au sein de l'école primaire ? J'ai corrigé avec un access=private en attendant plus d'informations. Si c'étaient bien des toilettes publiques sur le passage Draegger, elles ont probablement disparues.
MKnight (2017-04-25 10:25:09+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75085123 opening_hours getaggt. Kann es sein, dass Du eher eine contitional-restriction gemeint hast?

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions oder https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58150
MKnight (2017-04-25 10:26:07+00:00): Hups, sorry, das war nicht von Dir, nehme alles zurück.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-09-07 03:30:09+00:00): hello. i change classification road to secondary due the highway hierarchy. thank you
MKnight (2016-07-18 21:30:21+00:00): minspeed=50 erscheint mir hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197517138 und umliegende etwas komisch. 

Die minimalanforderungen an die Strasse sollte von link abgeleitet werden können (das wäre egtl. 61) Minspeed=50 heisst, dass ich mit nem DDR-Moped da langfahren kann um festzustellen, dass ich nicht auf die Autobahn darf.

Zusätzlich gibt es da nach SAT einen Feldweg, was die Sache noch komplizierter macht.
715371 (2016-07-22 12:37:01+00:00): minspeed/maxspeed stammen aus 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/1200108

Aber weil die maxspeed auf dem neuen Autobahnabschnitt auch noch fehlen, könnte man das dann ja auch vll machen. Ich öffne mal eine neue Notiz.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/637778
MKnight (2016-07-22 15:29:49+00:00): oh, da hab ich mich in der history verkuckt sorry
Baloo Uriza (2014-11-30 19:06:18+00:00): Is Trinity Parkway actually happening?  Last I heard, TXDOT was scrapping it as it was too close to the 183 Freeway to do anything other than increase congestion at it's interchanges and reduce usable space downtown.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-28 17:13:17+00:00): Czy wiesz jakie są źródła dla nazw typu "Krowodrza Południe", "Nowa Wieś Południe"? W Krakowie długo mieszkam a się z nimi nie spotkałem.
Władysław Komorek (2017-10-28 17:50:54+00:00): Osobiście to wszystkie nie oficjalne i nie tradycyjne nazwy lokalne w Krakowie należałoby pousuwać.
A dla takich "locality" jak Ludwinów zmieniać "name" na "old_name"
Nanosiłem je na podstawie dostępnych wcześniej map Bing lub Geoportal.
To chyba powstaję dla nowych grup budynków.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-29 00:42:37+00:00): Czyli  "Krowodrza Południe", "Nowa Wieś Południe" są raczej do skasowania?
Władysław Komorek (2017-10-29 06:25:45+00:00): Chyba tak.
To są nowo lokalne nazwy, nie administracyjne.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-11 13:32:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2078053815/history - skąd ta nazwa się wzięła? Mieszka tam 30 lat i nigdy się z nią nie spotkałem ale nie chcę kasować na ślepo.
Władysław Komorek (2021-01-11 13:35:21+00:00): Nie mam zielonego pojęcia, dlaczego 8 lat temu było to mapie.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-12 09:05:02+00:00): no to skasowałem
eggie (2024-08-23 20:41:54+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
Matija Nalis (2023-03-30 19:35:32+00:00): Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ?
PierZen (2023-03-31 22:16:36+00:00): Personnes déplacées means displaced people.  Re-reading the wiki for the DRC-Kivu response in december 2012, there were 800,000 people displaced and 100,000 in camps.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RD_Congo_Kivu
This is not documented on the wiki or on the hot discussion list. But this overpass query confirms that we did use [camp=yes][refugee=yes]
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1tda
jeka p (2016-12-12 16:03:05+00:00): Hallo!

wieso Schlüsseldienst als doityourself markiert?

"locksmith" passt hier sicher besser:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dlocksmith

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dlocksmith

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dkey_cutter
Schumann (2016-12-12 17:21:01+00:00): Anfängerfehler von mir...
jeka p (2016-12-12 19:08:23+00:00): ich habe ausgebessert. Oder passt Key Cutter besser?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dkey_cutter
frosm (2024-09-12 07:36:34+00:00): qu'est-ce qui te fait penser à un pont ? j'ai l'impression que c'est une buse sous la route sans pont
Ludovic Drouard (2025-12-29 19:35:34+00:00): Oups, je viens  de me rendre compte que je ne t'avais pas répondu, désolé :(
Effectivement, de mémoire, ca englobe les  2 chemins (Celui qui va au château et celui qui va vers les résidences), ce qui ferait un peu large et donc bizarre pour un simple pont. J'ai essayé de voir sur Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.557494&lng=5.889351&z=17&pKey=748346335827696&focus=photo) si j'avais un bon point de vue sur la voirie et te confirmer celà, mais ce n'est pas le cas....
Je n'ai pas l'occasion pour y retourner rapidement pour vérifier. Donc en l'état, je dirais qu'on peut se fier à ton jugement et passer cette partie du Forézan en buse avec un layer à -1... au besoin, je peux faire la modif.
Constable (2017-07-02 16:34:45+00:00): ciao, ho aggiunto un tratto di sentiero (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98897986) usando le tracce di strava ma non sono proprio della zona; se hai tempo per favore dagli un'occhiata, perché non sono sicuro che i tag mtb:scale e sac_scale siano adatti anche al "nuovo" tratto che ho aggiunto.
Grazie mille
mauriziobis (2017-07-02 16:41:53+00:00): Mi spiace ma non son mai passato da quel sentiero e non conoscendolo mi e' difficile aiutarti.
mauriziobis (2017-07-02 16:42:42+00:00): Cumunque, lascialo cosi' che prima o poi qualche esperto se e' il caso lo sistema.
Constable (2017-07-02 16:44:12+00:00): ciao, grazie per la risposta. É vero, in effetti non lo hai creato tu; chiedo a chi lo ha mappato per primo.
Grazie, ciao
naoliv (2017-07-14 13:04:17+00:00): Cesar, de dónde sacaste los nombres de las calles?
marc__marc (2023-05-12 19:52:07+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197844077
vous avez ajouté un foot=no sur cette route
je suppose que c'est une erreur vu qu'un route=hiking l'utilise.
Cordialement,
Marc
GerdP (2023-08-29 06:19:23+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Bin gerade irritiert über 
Deine Notiz "finger weg ! ungeteerte aber offizielle Landstraße !" Die hat leider bis heute überlebt, teilweise in Kombination mit surface=asphalt oder highway=residential. Kannst Du die bitte einfach entfernen oder gibt es da noch irgendwo einen guten Grund dafür?"
GeorgeKaplan (2022-12-10 08:58:57+00:00): Bonjour Frédéric,

Dans ce village, il y a plusieurs bâtiments taggués building=collapsed or sur le cadastre et les imageries aériennes récentes, ces bâtiments sont toujours visibles et en bon état. Qu'avez-vous voulu dire par ce tag ?
GerdP (2015-10-31 09:36:51+00:00): please review
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34988364
I've  changed the rarely used tag highway=abandoned_track
to abandoned:highway=track
Javier Sanchez (2018-01-26 20:42:49+00:00): En relación al etiquetado de colmenas, por favor visita esta página
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Tag:craft%3Dbeekeeper
Uranzu (2018-01-29 16:51:45+00:00): Gracias por avisar y por cambiar las etiquetas.
Uranzu (2018-01-29 17:08:09+00:00): Veo que tenía que hacerlo yo... Hecho. De todas formas el icono de craft=beekeaper en JOSM es una colmena. Parece que ellos tampoco lo tienen muy claro.
Saludos
Matija Nalis (2023-04-01 00:07:08+00:00):  Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?
PierZen (2023-04-01 11:39:37+00:00): you have asked the same question yesterday on changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14372622. See my answer there.
dgitto (2017-05-28 04:13:11+00:00): Ciao pippinu. Questo percorso http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156169925 , che hai inserito in gioventù, ha nome davvero "Verso Monte Ciccia"?
pippinu (2017-09-11 16:49:25+00:00): Non l'ho inserito io, era già stato inserito da qualcun altro e non ho voluto prendermi io la responsabilità di cambiarne il nome. Ovviamente non è un buon nome, probabilmente va cancellato.
4004 (2020-04-05 18:30:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198119086 там и правда сквозь лес идет?