piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
solenoid jam (2021-07-14 11:02:00+00:00): Да, и еще что бы не путаться надо пересечения дорожек фотографировать со всех направлений этих дорожек. Простое крестовое пересечение полезно отснять 4 раза, по одному фото с каждого из направлений. Расстояние от пересечения дорожек до места откуда производится съемка должно быть метров 5-10. GPS трек при этом тоже отражает крест на месте пересечения, что информативно.

Еще если у вас в телефоне есть компас, то полезно использовать приложение Open Camera, потому что оно добавляет в метаданные фоток значение направления смартфона при съемке. Потом в JOSM эти направления рисуются стрелочками, что исключает путаницу. 

Еще совет, если вы пишете треки по дорожкам, старайтесь не сворачивать на пересечениях с другими дорожками. Если есть одна дорожка, лучше пройти её от начала до конца (можно дважды), а потом уже переключаться на другие, пересекающие её. И их тоже следует проходить от начала до конца не сворачивая. Это уменьшает путаницу возникающую из за погрешностей GPS, ибо при большой плотности дорожек не всегда ясно на какую именно вы свернули. Уж лучше ходить прямыми путями, чем потом гадать куда сворачивали.

Последнее. Запись треков с велосипеда дает иногда худший результат, чем при ходьбе пешком, потому что при быстрой езде многие острые углы трека срезаются, что нежелательно. Или нужно останавливаться на каждом повороте, что бы GPS успел его зафиксировать.
superkiria (2021-07-15 18:14:25+00:00): Спасибо большое за ответ!
Omegatherion (2021-05-21 20:13:11+00:00): Bitte Leerstand eintragen und POI mit jahrelange History nicht einfach löschen
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
mapuit (2022-01-22 12:15:36+00:00): Der eingezeichnete Weg zur Haltestelle existiert so nicht. Auch gerade aus Gründen der Barrierefreiheit keine falschen Wege einzeichnen!
marc__marc (2024-09-05 20:53:42+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8742249610/history
I suppose you mean genus=Pyrus I <> Y :)
Regards,
Marc
ticki_52 (2024-10-11 09:02:58+00:00): Sorry for the late response. Pyrus is corrected. I had to clarify with LUBW that meanwhile there is only ONE tree left and therefore their files should be updated accordingly. This was done and communicated by 07-10-24. Happy mappng.... ticki_52
marc__marc (2024-10-11 09:28:33+00:00): Thanks for your feedback
habi (2021-12-17 11:58:07+00:00): Ciao Eco-Rocky
Das Altersheim Tilia ist kein Hotel :)
Ich habe deine Änderung hier korrigiert: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115053286
E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
Frans S (2021-07-14 15:29:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks fro mapping
A remark. You added mostly a tag 'fixme'to buildings.
Please be more confident in your own skills.
When an object is above groundlevelm rectangular or round  and shows a shadow next to, it is mostly a building. Look also  to the color of the roofs.
Validators also checking objects mapped as a building and adjust or  remove wrong mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
map per (2021-05-21 05:40:11+00:00): Hallo dr!tom,

es gibt einen Hinweis zur Höchstgeschwindigkeit auf der A95 in Fürstenried (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2675503). Noch wechselt in OSM die Höchstgeschwindigkeit mehrmals zwischen 60 und 80 was vermutlich falsch ist. Weißt du da mehr zu?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
dr!tom (2021-05-21 06:00:39+00:00): Zwei Segmente wurden von 80 km/h auf 60 km/h angepasst. Gruss dr!tom
map per (2021-05-21 16:55:49+00:00): Danke!
bekreyev (2021-06-02 16:53:50+00:00): С чего Вы решили, что название лодочной станции "Спасатель" в Димитровграде - это emergency=lifeguard_base ?
Luzandro (2021-05-19 16:42:21+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier zu einem kleinen Abschnitt angegeben, dass dieser für Fußgänger verboten sei, der darauf folgende Abschnitt dagegen erlaubt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940458366
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46967538

Das kann kaum beides stimmen und ich würde empfehlen, die StreetComplete-Aufgabe "Ist es Fußgängern verboten, hier auf dieser Straße zu gehen?" generell zu deaktivieren. Es gibt nur wenige Straßen, die tatsächlich für Fußgänger verboten sind (meistens bei Tunneln, siehe Verkehrsschild: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_seit_2017#/media/Datei:Zeichen_259_-_Verbot_für_Fußgänger,_StVO_1992.svg ), während fälschlicherweise vergebene Beschränkungen immer wieder Probleme beim Fußgänger-Routing bereiten.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104890352
voltairovicz (2021-05-18 12:46:47+00:00): Ohh, bardzo ważna edycja
Buraddo (2021-05-18 12:41:23+00:00): Hello, you have deleted a new building. Please use Maxar imagery; it is newer than Bing
Buraddo (2021-05-18 15:02:26+00:00): Please do not tag everything as building, you have retagged a lake, two industrial courts and afuel station parking as buildings. Why?
DD1GJ (2021-05-21 08:29:22+00:00): A note to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944258883/history

Unfortunately, this has nothing at all to do with the reality visible on NRW orthophoto. The northern part is a driveway to the house and the southern part is just meadow. Could you please correct this?
---
Eine Anmerkung zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944258883/history

Das hat leider überhaupt nichts mit der auf NRW Orthophoto sichtbaren Realität zu tun. Der nördliche Teil ist eine Zufahrt zu dem Haus und der südliche Teil ist nur Wiese. Könntest Du das bitte korrigieren?
Access Claims (komoot) (2021-05-24 14:57:21+00:00): Thanks for taking the time to send this correction! We made a mistake here and have reverted a portion of this edit. The owner did contact us to explain that they changed the paths that were accessible here and blocked some of them with gates, but we misunderstood. Sorry about that!
DD1GJ (2021-05-24 22:39:48+00:00): Thank you for the correction, but it has made the misunderstanding even worse. I have now made the correction using the aerial photograph and the cadastral map:

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=105252552

The path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944258883 is now the private driveway to house number 12. 

Many greetings, Joachim

------

Danke für Die Korrektur, aber das Missverständnis hat sich dadurch noch weiter verschlimmert. Ich habe nun die Korrektur anhand des Luftbildes und der Katasterkarte durchgeführt:

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=105252552

Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944258883 ist nun die private Zufahrt zu dem Haus Nummer 12. 

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Access Claims (komoot) (2021-05-25 06:40:22+00:00): Alles klar, jetzt verstehe ich, was du gemeint hast. Danke nochmal!
PT-53 (2021-05-19 07:42:36+00:00): Luftbilder angeschaut ?
Mike Baggaley (2021-05-20 18:51:14+00:00): This way already had the two names in it. Please see the alt_name, name:left and name:right fields. Each field should only contain one name. Cheers,
Mike
NavigatorPilot (2021-05-20 19:05:30+00:00): Yes, and according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Left_and_right_names the name= tag can contain both street names separated by a hyphen (I also saw a help page which seems to suggest a dash, which is what I used here).

The street signs on each side of the street here have different names. If you only favour one name, then it's difficult when people try to navigate to this street. I concede that the use of a hyphen or slash to separate the names is not ideal, but the lack of rendering of the alt_name (or name=left/right) tag is what lead me to use the slash here.

It would be nice if the tooling could be improved to actually render both names and if navigation actually allowed on to refer to either street name (depending on the building name being navigated to of course).
NavigatorPilot (2021-05-20 19:07:49+00:00): A couple of typos in my comment:
*s/dash/slash/
*s/allowed on/allowed one/
Mike Baggaley (2021-05-21 08:01:13+00:00): Two names are put in the name field in Wales where there are both names on a single sign, but I don't think it is appropriate here (despite the suggestion in the wiki). This is a form of 'making up a name' and tagging for the renderer. When navigating to this street the adjacent ways are named with one or other of the names, it is only a short segment that has both, so users are certainly going to find their way to it. If you search for Alma Square, you will see that OSM lists Hill Road as it also searches in the alt_name field. It makes no sense to have two names in the name field and one of them in the alt_name field as the alt_name field is specifically for allowing names to be separated. The name:left and name:right are used to further distinguish where the names apply. In my view the name field should contain a value that you would expect to find in a gazetteer. I think the wiki needs an update.
SK53 (2021-05-21 19:53:22+00:00): Also worth noting that Andy Townsend's UK specific map handles these cases directly in code (i.e., generates a name containing both parts), see https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=19&lat=51.53159&lon=-0.180258. This really shows that the renderer on the main OSM site is just not using such data.
txemt (2021-11-13 13:38:39+00:00): I'm curious as to why you created 2 fairways of water within Lake Maurepas. The lake isn't really a navigable waterway, except by recreational boats, and even that's questionable in some parts of the lake.
zorque (2021-11-13 15:31:34+00:00): Hi txemt, this is to connect the rivers and streams that drain into the lake with the outlet to achieve a connected system of water flows. Waterway=fairway might not be the right tag, feel free to improve with your local knowledge.
I'm open to further discussion,
cheers, Marc
txemt (2021-11-14 02:05:45+00:00): I was looking to move the parish lines toward the center of the lake, however the fairways are attached to at the point where they meet with the river between the two lakes. From what I can tell, the only way to separate that junction is to delete the fairways.
zorque (2021-11-16 14:10:41+00:00): Sorry for not getting back earlier. Seems like you've already split the overlaying ways.
Happy mapping!
txemt (2021-11-17 23:36:11+00:00): Do you have an email address? I'd like to send you something.
zorque (2021-11-19 13:57:40+00:00): sent you DM
wireguy (2021-05-18 17:16:20+00:00): QuickCheck has a convenience and a fuel,   I added the convenience and fixed fuel.   There was also a dragged service node that I correct.   Thanks for mapping, Keep going!
Kha_nam (2021-05-19 06:42:18+00:00): Hi LucianaRocha
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with service road and residential roads kindly check with ways 97347713,942086519,902630140,
878070736
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104933218
Thankyou
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104894357
eggie (2021-05-18 14:24:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Wanneer de wegen nog niet gereed zijn dan taggen mey highway=construction  construction=residential
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Slothdanig (2021-05-18 14:40:47+00:00): Bedankt Eggie, ik zal het eens rustig doorlezen. De wegen die ik toegevoegd heb zijn al toegankelijk. Dit overigens i.t.t. een deel van de henk blankestijnstraat, die opgeleverd is tot aan huisnummers 7 en 16, de rest is nog in aanleg.
eggie (2021-05-18 14:46:31+00:00): Oke..  Up to the local mapper !
Veel plezier met mappen
eggie
Kha_nam (2021-05-19 06:32:34+00:00): Hi Carla Parisi
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with service road 
kindly check with way 901551471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104932621
Thankyou
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104894442
Kha_nam (2021-05-19 06:27:17+00:00): Hi JanainaGuy
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 903235296
way 880935673
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104932196
Thankyou
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104894490
philippec (2021-05-19 16:10:26+00:00): Nieuwenhove AED.  Je zult lang mogen wachten.  Eduardo heeft geschreven dat ze eind deze maand hun backend zullen verbeterd hebben.  Wellicht kan je al aan de foto in ID.  Je moet dan op je naam klikken en dan kan je de link kopiëren.
Thibault Rommel (2021-05-19 16:22:22+00:00): Bedankt voor de info, is bij deze opgelost :)
Kha_nam (2021-05-19 06:08:34+00:00): Hi Cleber Caputi
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 177837102
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104930683
Thankyou
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104894829
mueschel (2021-05-20 15:05:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Please note that all keys you use to identify an object needs to be in English -
everything else is not understood by the software and is not shown on maps.
Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.
Kha_nam (2021-05-19 03:54:55+00:00): Hi Otilia Ies
Fixed the alignment of the tertiary and unclassified way kindly refer with way 117926384
way 653982676
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104923318
Thankyou
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895050
Kha_nam (2021-05-19 03:43:19+00:00): Hi Beatriz Brandao
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 901430820
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104922808
Thankyou
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895109
Kha_nam (2021-05-19 03:35:07+00:00): Hi gislene oliveira
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 252593202
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104922596
Thankyou
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895173
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 07:42:07+00:00): Hi Cleber Caputi,
I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with highways.Kindly check with way 177837095,way 874530157,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104937142.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895175
Luca Moiana (2021-05-19 06:36:26+00:00): il tag corretto è landuse=forest da e non natural=wood che si riferisce  a boschi non gestiti
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 06:03:15+00:00): Hi Luiza Mariutti,
I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with residential highway.Kindly check with way 902914170,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104930374.
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895424
Carto'Cité (2021-07-29 13:26:23+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette contribution.
Le découpage des escaliers et escalators en sections à Pont Cardinet pose un problème sur la cohérence du tag level : on ne peut pas avoir 3 sections avec le même tag level, c'est incohérent au niveau du routage. Répartir le changement de niveau est envisageable mais serait un peu lourd. J'ai préféré réunifier les escaliers et ajouter le tag covered=yes pour indiquer qu'il sont "à l'abri des intempéries". À noter également la présence du tag indoor=yes, qui pourrait aussi être location=indoor ou underground...
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF Transilien
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 05:47:07+00:00): Hi Eduardo Almeida1,
I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with residential highway.Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104929309.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895541
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 05:42:42+00:00): Hi anasimamura,
I have fixed the alignment of dragged node on residential highway.Kindly check with way 653961599,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104929021.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895582
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 05:36:38+00:00): Hi JanainaGuy,
 I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with residential highways.Kindly check with way 903235295,way 880935674,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104928591.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895657
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 05:30:53+00:00): Hi Beatriz Brandao,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with highway.Kindly check with way 903624905,way 182547526,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104928251.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895690
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 04:58:05+00:00): Hi Otilia Ies,
I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with highways.Kindly check with way 902586644,way 876118690,node 8742615023,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104926320.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895797
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 04:43:58+00:00): Hi Luiza Mariutti ,
 I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with Unclassified highway.Kindly check with way 902914621,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104925628.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104895911
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 04:34:37+00:00): Hi Matheus Kim Campos,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon crossing with residential highway.Kindly check with way 154533210,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104925094.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104896049
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 04:30:22+00:00): Hi gislene oliveira ,
 I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with service highway.Kindly check with way 875083590,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104924940. 
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104896056
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 04:25:44+00:00): Hi Carla Parisi
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with residential highway.Kindly check with way 866558559,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104924698.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104896140
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 04:21:45+00:00): Hi Fabiana Pires,
 I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with highway.Kindly check with way 902935165,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104924513.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104896150
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 03:21:38+00:00): Hi Otilia Ies,
 I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with service highway.Kindly check with way 903983521,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104922146.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104896187
AntMadeira (2021-05-18 19:27:07+00:00): O ponto de escalada não será no penhasco mais a norte, que é maior?
Aires Lourenço (2021-05-19 19:34:41+00:00): A zona que mais encontro escaladores é neste local e quando falo com alguns esta zona é que mais gostam pela dificuldade.
Está aqui um link que podes confirmar :http://climbingportugal.blogspot.com/2015/04/vale-de-poios-pombal.html?m=1
Aires Lourenço (2021-05-19 19:36:32+00:00): Mas se quiseres posso identificar as falésias mais conhecidas pelos escaladores.
AntMadeira (2021-05-19 21:05:50+00:00): Eu conheço a zona, mas de memória, penso que a parede é a que está mais a norte, a uns 50 m do local que marcaste, que tem mais altura, como aliás me parece pelas imagens de satélite (pela camada ESRI vê-se isso bem).
Mas como não tenho como confirmar, não tenho por que alterar. As imagens dessa página não são elucidativas.
Aires Lourenço (2021-05-19 21:14:22+00:00): Essa falésia que estás a falar é conhecida pelo nome de " Senhora da Estrela".
Aquela de que falo é dos "Poios"
Aires Lourenço (2021-05-19 21:15:43+00:00): E que também posso identificar.
AntMadeira (2021-05-19 21:26:56+00:00): Podes adicionar um ponto procurando por "local de escalada" no editor e adicionar o nome nesse ponto, se houver, tal como fiz para esse que já está mapeado entre o fundo do vale e o penhasco norte.
Aires Lourenço (2021-05-19 21:29:39+00:00): Ok
ravali_78 (2021-05-19 03:05:34+00:00): Hi Darly Farias,
I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with service road.Kindly check with way 944278420,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104921562.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104896275
rthik007 (2021-05-19 07:12:27+00:00): Hi DiegoPinto,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road and service road way 878078608, way 903621618
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104935528
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104896337
canfe (2021-05-18 15:32:36+00:00): Sicuro che l'abbiano collegata??
A settembre 2020 non lo era.
Non basta togliere l'errore di OSMOSE, bisogna che l'errore ci sia anche.
E' ovvio che lo segnali, ma è solo una segnalazione. Tu sei passato di lì recentemente?
Skinoku (2021-05-19 18:20:43+00:00): Ciao!
Scusa sai che ho confuso il posto.
Hai ragione... c'è un ditch tra la strada e la ciclabile.
Ho corretto la mappa aggiungendo una nota cosicchè altri non cadano nel tranello.
Mentre c'ero, ho aggiunto il fosso alla mappa.
A presto
rthik007 (2021-05-19 07:05:52+00:00): Hi Claudia Costa,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road way 902581314
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104935130
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104896450
Branko Kokanovic (2021-07-21 17:19:37+00:00): Hi, can you double check that bicycle=private on way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944280678. Seems like an error and prevent bicycle routing? Rest of way is allowed for bicycle and I suspect it is an error. I will change it, but be aware that I did that
Branko Kokanovic (2021-07-21 17:25:01+00:00): Changed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108378685
MS50 (2021-07-22 07:22:00+00:00): I must have made an error. I am usually not concerned with these kinds of attributes since they require more in-depth knowledge of the situation. I don't recall making a change. Thank you for the correction