piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jiří Komárek (2019-11-04 14:23:57+00:00): Ahoj, 
chtěl jsem se zeptat na německé názvy, které jsi sem doplňoval: odkud ty názvy pocházejí? Je to něco oficiálního/historicky oficiálního/jména používaného místní německy mluvící komunitou nebo jde jenom o doslovný překlad? Pokud to druhé, tak mi to nedává moc smysl: ten německý název neexistuje a nikdy neexistoval a nikdo tu ulici tudíž nebude pod tímto názvem hledat.
Jirka
NyanSten (2019-11-04 17:07:23+00:00): Ahoj, jména pochází z knihy Úřední seznam ulic, náměstí a sadů hlavního města Prahy (1940)
https://digitalniknihovna.mlp.cz/view/uuid:e00177c0-679a-11dd-985c-000d606f5dc6
Jiří Komárek (2019-11-04 17:12:04+00:00): wow, to jsem nečekal (na Panoramě to nevypadalo tak staré). 
Díky za odkaz a taky za doplnění těch jmen (jestliže byly používány za války, tak je fajn je mít i v OSM).
Ewen Hill (2018-05-30 10:24:02+00:00): Well done on all the changes around Katoomba over last few days. Some of the best accessible additions I have seen.
abakus_uploader (2018-05-30 00:33:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
joost schouppe (2019-03-11 14:39:34+00:00): Easy to miss, but I think you forgot to remove the construction tag on this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551937703 when you ended the construction works.
praeteritum (2023-01-09 00:51:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131034624.
viloan (2018-05-29 13:11:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
praeteritum (2023-01-09 00:40:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131034602.
praeteritum (2023-01-09 00:38:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131034599.
praeteritum (2023-01-08 04:41:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131002506.
evod (2018-05-29 16:25:48+00:00): Nice :)
Zur Info: wenn du bei Einbahnöffnungen auch cycleway=opposite* mappst dann hat es auch den Vorteil, dass die OpenCycleMap es rendert.
elkueb (2018-05-29 19:38:15+00:00): Ah, ist erledigt :) Danke :)
praeteritum (2023-01-07 18:35:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130992224.
SomeoneElse (2019-03-06 12:56:33+00:00): Hello Stella GBO,
Was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591832256 perhaps part of an import?  It seems a little odd, as it has an unusual tag on it (landcover=trees) and doesn't really seem to match the imagery.
This landcover=trees way was mentioned at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-470009614 , so I'm just trying to work out where it came from - hope you don't mind me asking.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-03-06 12:56:53+00:00): Hola Stella GBO,
¿Fue https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591832256 tal vez parte de una importación? Parece un poco extraño, ya que tiene una etiqueta inusual (landcover = trees) y realmente no parece coincidir con las imágenes.
Esta forma de landcover = trees se mencionó en https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-470009614, así que solo estoy tratando de averiguar de dónde viene: espero que no les importe yo preguntando
Atentamente,
Andy
angys (2018-05-30 06:25:11+00:00): Not this line, is Sungai Buloh Serdang Putrajaya Line.
RicoElectrico (2018-06-02 20:10:49+00:00): Cześć! Ten cmentarz zmapowany jako punkt jest zbędny. Jest już od dawna naniesiony jako obszar.
naoliv (2018-06-19 22:19:34+00:00): danctc, você acabou apagando vários trechos que representavam a água (o canal) e criou um novo canal como sendo linha costeira.
Precisa tomar cuidado com o uso de linha costeira e tentar, na medida do possível, reaproveitar e corrigir o que já existe no mapa, sem apagar para depois refazer novamente.
viloan (2018-05-29 14:23:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Hjart (2018-05-31 06:37:20+00:00): Ved hjælp af multipolygoner laver vi f.eks. bygninger med "huller" i: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8341030
Road–Runner (2018-06-30 00:04:01+00:00): okay you are not just editing for maps.me, but for openstreetmap. so please read this pages, because it seems your entrys are wrong:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/about
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome

so: no fictional things on the map! an it seems this turtle island is fake!!!
BCNorwich (2018-05-29 17:06:51+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I wonder how you can be sure the footpath through the farm does not exist? I can assure you that I would not have mapped it in 2012 without very good reason. Just because it is not on the county map is not evidence that it does not exist. Folk are trying to have many paths put on the definitive map that were left off in error (so called lost ways). 
Further by deleting the existing mapping and re-drawing it you are removing valuable history from the OSM database. My name and date of mapping were in the history of the long footpath, after your re-drawing they are no longer there. The only way to regain this history is to revert your changes and then re-make your amendments. I can do this for you if you wish?
Regarding the shorter path you added. At the east end it looks like you placed the path to the north of the hedge, it should be south of the hedge. It should also extend onto Delvyns Lane, you have it terminating/joining to the parish boundary thus not reaching the road. Don't rely on the County Council map, the path joined the grass verge and thence the road where there is a waymark.
If I can help in any way please just ask. Regards Bernard
GeoBart (2018-05-29 17:25:16+00:00): Hi Bernard,
I'm new to this so apologies, I simply assumed the Essex highways online map was a positively concrete source of current PRoWs. I regularly run past this spot and from memoery I am sure there is no PRoW signage and a 'private land' sign + given there was another PRoW nearby not in OSM I believed I had good reason to assume a recent change... but you are clearly more knowledgable on this subject so happy for you to revert the changes! Cheers
viloan (2018-05-29 14:36:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kayle (2018-05-30 04:48:18+00:00): Zdravím. Jedna malá pripomienka. Pozor pri kreslení čiary. Keď sa v "bode A" začne treba ju ukončiť v "bode B" a nie pokračovať zas do "bodu A". (skrátka, aby nešla čiara tam aj späť po rovnakých bodoch) 
.
Tiež poprosím, nekresliť cestu iného typu cez už existujúcu cestu. Cesta sa dá rozdeliť. Kliknúť na cestu, tá sa označí a je vidieť body cesty, Pravým kliknúť na bod kde sa cesta má rozdeliť a v ponuke čo sa objaví kliknúť na nožnice. Potom upraviť vlastnosti tej časti, ktorá je nesprávne zaznačená.
.
Uvedené drobnosti som opravil.
Len mám ešte jednu otázku k tomu chodníku. Podľa 
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/KmD5XrUU1Bum4yuFhydg2A to vyzerá na cestu (ale je to rok staré). Ak to je teraz chodník nepridali tam náhodou aj nejaké stĺpiky, aby sa tam nedalo ísť autom?
Ďakujem
Jaroslav Kardoš (2018-06-06 10:23:13+00:00): Dobrý deň,
Ospravedlňujem sa za chybné kreslenie čiar. OSM som začal používať iba nedávno a tak som nie ešte moc skúsený ( viem, to neospravedlňuje ). Čo sa týka tej cesty. Chlodievam do Bánoviec do kina TAJMS ( menil som názov ale, stále zobrazuje Geminilux) a keďže vždy testujem aj OSM tak viem, že to cesta nie je. Už som sa na tom 2x oklamal. Je tam iba akýsi chodník či ako to definovať. Autom sa tam nedá ísť a nie je tam ani odbočka. Pri spustení navigácie to ale vždy vedie cez tú trasu.
kayle (2018-07-03 06:32:44+00:00): Tak podľa všetkého to je zjazdné pre autá. Viď aj aktuálnu dodatkovú tabuľku https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.71716524013314&lng=18.253373800365807&z=17&dateFrom=2018-05-01&pKey=wgmbRRKwop6iNHBOKlntsw&focus=photo&x=0.588204664609685&y=0.449869566158687&zoom=0.7445591163366999
(prípadne aj okolité zábery)
Je to zmenené na highway=service. Zvažujem okrem šírky či nepridať aj service=driveway. Nie je to síce čisto príjazdová cesta k nehnuteľnosti (no, minimálne k jednej vedie), ale určite to pridá penalizáciu.
Your Village Maps (2018-05-30 04:44:49+00:00): You just changed everything I recently did there.  I also used Mapbox Satellite imagery, as you say you have.  But you seem to have reverted it to an older, now obsolete configuration.  The only NY 17 West flyover now open is the one where you have to bear to the right, NOT left (that's the old one).
SGwithADD (2018-05-30 04:49:34+00:00): I have driven through the intersection in the last 15 days, and have verified this with the most recent public information posted by the construction company and NYSDOT.  There are two flyovers for NY 17 West at this junction that are new, open, and permanent.  The one on the left, which is part of the final design, was opened in 2016, and carries mainline NY 17 WB traffic across the river.  This is the one that was missing, and which I added in.  The one on the right, also part of the final design, opened in late 2017, and carries traffic entering from NY 7 that is destined for NY 17 West, and merges with the NY 17 mainline on the west shore of the Chenango River.  The permanent configuration has both westbound flyovers to avoid weaving near the mainline split between I-81 and NY 17.
archie (2018-05-29 18:15:26+00:00): Här är det path och inte cycleway. Återigen läs hjälpsidorna: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag
BCNorwich (2018-05-29 17:37:22+00:00): Hi, the south west section of Way: 591847196 duplicates the track already mapped. Please amend or update the existing OSM features so as to keep as much mapping history as possible. In this case the existing track can be made into two sections with one section amended by adding foot=yes. This will achieve what you wish without duplicating or removing anything.
If you need help please just ask. Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2018-06-01 07:13:21+00:00): Hi, no response so I've removed the duplication and tagged that section as foot=yes.
archie (2018-05-29 18:13:18+00:00): Det är ingen mening att du lägger till motor_vehicle=no. Kolla hjälpsidorna först: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Default
viloan (2018-05-29 14:52:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
gscholz (2018-07-14 07:28:37+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the osm database regarding self-intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-54.50490&lat=-25.45493&zoom=16&opacity=0.75

Can you please fix this?

Saludos
Guido
viloan (2018-05-29 14:53:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-05-29 17:01:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
laurent-38 (2018-05-29 20:08:12+00:00): Bonjour Aroche,

Comment as-tu déterminé la forme de la réserve naturelle ? Cette nouvelle forme me semble contestable à plusieurs points de vue :
- elle ne correspond pas à celle donnée par l’INPN (cf https://inpn.mnhn.fr/zone/sinp/espaces/viewer/type/93/code/FR9300069), ni à celle de http://www.reserves-naturelles.org/etang-de-saint-bonnet
- elle ne correspond au bornage sur site (il y a des poteaux d’1 m de haut tous les 100 m, n’est-ce pas la limite de la réserve ?)
- il est étrange que l’aire de tir à l'arc soit incluse dans la réserve.

Cordialement
~~
laurent
Aroche (2018-06-01 09:42:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Le contour de la réserve a été modifié en 2011 : http://www.reserves-naturelles.org/sites/default/files/reserves/rnr76-delibclassdossier_20111216_signee.pdf
La parcelle BP 14 qui contient l'aire de tir à l'arc est bien incluse entièrement dans le périmètre. Je dispose d'une carte plus claire issue du plan de gestion, que je peux te communiquer.
Source : je travaille à Réserves Naturelles de France. J'ai déjà signalé cette modification à l'INPN, mais ça prend un peu de temps, et je vais faire le nécessaire pour que le site de RNF ait la bonne version.

Cordialement
laurent-38 (2018-06-04 14:08:28+00:00): Bonjour Aroche,
Merci pour ces informations, pardonne-moi d’avoir mis en doute le sérieux de ta contribution.
(étant moi-même résident de la commune, j’ignorais que la réserve avait été agrandie).
Cordialement, laurent.
BCNorwich (2018-05-29 17:53:30+00:00): Hi, I'm really very sorry to have to say that this path should be on the field edge south of the hedge. 
Can I respectfully request that you survey yourself, take notes/photos thus you can be correct when editing/adding to OSM
If you need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2018-06-01 07:18:33+00:00): Amended
datendelphin (2018-05-29 19:30:03+00:00): Hallo und Danke für deine Beiträge. Du hast hier eine Wohnstrasse eingezeichnet. Die hat aber typischerweise eine Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzung von 20kmh. Hast du das vielleicht vergessen einzutragen? Ich würde dich gerne bitten, etwas aussagekräftigere Changeset Kommentare zu schreiben wie "div. Richtigstellungen". Das macht es einfacher nachzuvollziehen, was du geändert hast.  Der Rest sieht gut aus. Grüsse Michael
rellim781 (2018-05-29 15:42:27+00:00): Added house number for building
viloan (2018-05-29 15:42:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
edvac (2018-07-24 16:36:18+00:00): Vous avez tracé des limites administratives au Burkina Faso, avec source=IGB.
Cela est une importation de données d'une institution, et donc doit suivre les directives d'importation ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Import/Guidelines ). Est-ce que vous avez discussé cette importation avec la communauté burkinabé ? Est-ce que vous avez permission du IGB pour importer ces données à OSM ?

You have edited administrative limits in Burkina Faso, with source=IGB.
That's a data import from one institution, and therefore it has to follow the import guidelines ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ). Have you discussed this import with the Burkina Faso community ? Have you got permission from the IGB to import these data into OSM ?
edvac (2018-09-23 11:34:09+00:00): Votre importation de limites du IGB sans permission ont presque 12000 noeuds de frontière dupliqués et 316 chevauchements de limites, entre autres. Ils ont été importés sans permission (apparentment) du IGB, sans aucune consultation avec la communauté locale OSM, sans suivre la guide d'importation et en utilisant voies au lieu de relations type boundary.
Vous n'avez pas répondu a mon message dans 2 mois. Donc je ferai le "revert" du changeset et les autres similaires.

Your boundary import of IGB data without permission has almost 12000 duplicated boundary nodes and 316 crossing of ways, among others. They have been imported without permission (apparently) from the IGB, without due consultation with local OSM community, it didn't followed the import guidelines and it uses way instead of relation of type boundary.
You haven't answered my message in 2 months, so I will proceed to revert this changeset and its siblings.
Patok (2018-09-24 13:44:24+00:00): Bonjour. Désolé d'avoir mis du temps à vous répondre. Je ne savais pas qu'il y a une procédure à suivre. Comme je n'ai pas suivi la procédure d'importation et n'ai pas demandé l'accord de l'IGB vous pouvez annuler mes changements. Je peux vous aider si vous m'expliquer comment faire. Désolé du désagrément.
edvac (2018-09-24 17:25:42+00:00): Merci pour la reponse, Patok.

J'ai annulé ("reverted") les 87 groupes de changements suivants, dans cet ordre:

59403680
59403529
59403422
59403322
59403110
59402905
59402786
59402372
59402158
59402006
59393317
59393265
59393220
59393127
59393080
59393020
59392789
59392684
59392330
59392242
59391870
59391792
59391736
59391683
59391630
59391592
59391567
59391520
59391466
59391398
59391353
59391185 (resolved name and relation members conflict)
59391123
59373465
59373445
59373333
59373285
59373240
59373181
59373124
59373070
59372982
59372934
59372852
59372766
59372572
59372519
59372461
59372421
59372382
59372353
59372310
59372273
59372246
59372180
59372081
59371983
59370864
59370833
59369374
59369331
59369109
59367862
59367791
59367439
59367396
59367349
59366630
59366587
59364126
59364100
59364052
59363784
59363477
59363441
59363402
59363380
59363328
59363305
59363250
59363158
59363064
59362959
59362707
59362594
59362314
59343719

SVP: Si vous n'est pas sûr, avant d'uploader des données d'une institution ou organisation (publique ou privée), veuillez contacter moi ou quelq'un(e) dans la communauté. Pour annuler ces groupes de modifications m'a pris environ 2 heures.

Les données sont maintenant comme ils étaient avant ces modifications.
stromo (2018-05-29 18:44:06+00:00): What are you mapping without comment?

Yours sincerely
user_5359 (2018-05-29 16:31:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
spiregrain (2018-06-05 16:08:41+00:00): Hi - this is supported by the Newham planning portal...  E.g. their map shows the location of 186 Henniker Road as being west of Major Road.   

https://pa.newham.gov.uk/online-applications/propertyDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=000VH2JYLI000

(You can use the map tab, but you'll need to zoom in, like a lot).
rskedgell (2018-06-05 16:52:41+00:00): Thanks. I preferred to rely on what I could see on the ground, but it's reassuring that LB Newham's records agree.