piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nzara (2015-05-04 09:46:11+00:00): Dieser Abschnitt der A16 hatte noch im letzten Jahr einen Fahrradstreifen und war deshalb als Hauptstrasse klassiert. Hast du die Umklassierung wirklich vor Ort beobachtet?
Stephan R (2015-05-04 15:28:21+00:00): Es gibt tatsächlich einen Fahrradstreifen auf einem Teil der Autobahn A16 im Abschnitt zwischen Biel und Reuchenette. Da hat sich auch nichts geändert. (Ich wohne gleich um die Ecke).
Die Strasse gilt aber (soweit ich es eruieren kann) offiziell als "Autobahn", womöglich müsste man sie so klassieren dass auf gewissen Abschnitten "Fahrrad" erlaubt ist. Wäre das richtig(er)?
Nzara (2015-05-04 17:24:45+00:00): Die Klassierung motorway (Autobahn) bedeutet (unter anderem): hier nur Auto! 
Das gilt unabhängig davon, wie die Strasse genannt wird. Für mich handelt es sich um eine sehr gut ausgebaute Hauptstrasse (primary). Der Abschnitt fällt ja auch mit der N6 zusammen. 
In der Schweiz heissen auch schon mal zweispurige Strassen mit Gegenverhehr Autobahn. Da sollte man sich dann an die Wirklichkeit halten. Die Referenz-Nr. A16 kann die Strasse trotzdem tragen.
Stephan R (2015-05-06 19:52:18+00:00): Ja, du hast vollkommen recht. Ich hatte es mit dem ASTRA kurzgeschlossen, und hier die "offizielle" Antwort: 

Im von Ihnen angesprochenen Abschnitt steht die A16 auch dem Langsamverkehr (Velo, Töffli, Traktoren) offen. Sie entspricht deshalb nicht den Anforderungen an eine Nationalstrasse 1. Klasse (Autobahn) oder 2. Klasse („Mini“-Autobahn mit reduzierten Fahrbahnquerschnitten oder Autostrasse), sondern ist eine Gemischtverkehrsstrasse und wird somit zur Nationalstrasse 3. Klasse. Nationalstrassen erster und zweiter Klasse stehen ausschliesslich dem „schnellen“ Verkehr zur Verfügung (Fahrzeuge, welche legal mindestens 80 km/h erreichen dürfen).

ich werde die Umklassifizierung zu Hauptstrasse (primary) wieder vornehmen. Sorry für den Fehler und Danke für das Feedback!
Stephan R (2015-05-06 19:58:41+00:00): sehe gerade, du hast es schon gemacht :-) Danke.
Nzara (2015-05-07 18:27:53+00:00): Ich kam kürzlich noch mal da vorbei und die Schilder waren eindeutig: Ende Autobahn --- Anfang Autobahn. Da ich mich um die Buslinie auf dem Abschnitt gekümmert habe, ging das Thema in einem Aufwasch mit.
sheldonelectric (2020-07-13 22:05:02+00:00): Is this really the names you saw on street signs???
mappas (2020-07-14 05:09:12+00:00): Sorry, of course not, that was the old me, who didn't know lots about naming, and wanted the names to show up in "english" on my navigation app or something like this :^)
They can all be removed.
poldekch (2015-04-26 09:50:57+00:00): School complex Colaiste Pobail Setanta and Scoil Grainne
GerdP (2015-12-13 10:26:47+00:00): Hi there!
This change created many objects with useless tags like 
name=""
or 
layer="Unknown Area Type"
Many objects seem to describe buildings,
but often the shapes don't match. Do you think that this data is useful?
naoliv (2015-07-16 05:07:40+00:00): natinacio, de onde você está obtendo a numeração das saídas e o destino delas?
Também tem algumas coisas erradas: não se dá nome de "Saída", "Mata", "Lago", etc para os objetos.
natinacio (2015-07-16 12:14:37+00:00): A numeração está nas placas do trevo passo por lá todos os dias. Agora isso de nomes de mata e lago eu não sabia. Vou retirando nos que for editando
mr-pi (2015-04-25 23:45:16+00:00): parkplätze hinzugefügt
rab (2015-05-24 10:36:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19623
Die Relation könnte man eigentlich löschen. Postleitzahlgebiete sind mittlerweile flächendeckend anders gelöst.
cjs80 (2015-04-26 00:26:57+00:00): Improving position of River Leri and surrounding forest.
Mr_Brown (2015-04-27 22:08:12+00:00): Loveland is now in RMNP? Heh, lol. :)
HubMiner (2019-03-12 13:40:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340548010

Hi, you made pedestrian way as area, which seems not compatible with navigation (I encountered this problem over most Disney parks).  I have a fresh trace for this location.  Are you OK if I add a path over this area?
joyvious324 (2015-04-26 03:49:06+00:00): ...but road names are retained.
SK53 (2015-04-26 17:44:12+00:00): Hi thanks for contributing to OSM Mapping for Nepal.

I wonder why you changed the track into Manang into an unclassified road. My latest information from 1 year ago is that there has been little progress with the 'Chinese Road' and no bridges are in place. Unclassified road is only suitable if the road is used by 4-wheeled vehicles. As far as I know this is not the case in the valley around Manang.

If you have some more up-to-date information please let me know.
ApoorvaLal (2015-04-26 17:51:45+00:00): Hi,
A friend of mine who was helping me map hiked the manaslu route up to manang a couple of months ago and said that there is a road is usable for up to 4WD (and hence isn't just a path) up to Manang. 
I am, of course, basing this on hearsay. I will confirm this once again and let you know pronto. 
best,
AL
SK53 (2015-04-26 18:12:48+00:00): Great thanks for replying.

My information, based on March 2014, was that the road was "There are no Cars, only Motorbikes, between Dhikur Pokhari and Manang." and in particular that a bridge was missing between Bhratang and Dhikur Pokhari.

I know the road has been under construction for quite a while.

It would be great if you could check with your friend for more details. Also if they have any photos showing the condition of the road, perhaps they could upload them to Wikimedia Commons.
CloCkWeRX (2016-11-10 04:01:45+00:00): Hey, just wanted to say nice work with the house mapping around here!

We use mapbox streets at work as a property industry company - http://imgur.com/a/CpPTU is what it looks like in our system.

The stuff on the left, blurred, are recent sales along Danks street, which includes things like Land Area from private suppliers.

What we don't have (but could get because of your contributions) is approximate building area.

One thing you might be interested in asking your local council about is if they have "building footprint data" - check out the City of Geelong, where they flew around and did LIDAR measurements.

If they have it and publish it via data.gov.au; importing isn't too tricky.
hongakonga (2015-04-26 06:34:41+00:00): Diesen Umfang zu löschen, war ein großer Fehler, den ich versuche rückgängig zu machen. Ich kämpfe allerdings noch mit der Technik.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 07:25:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3477933576/history

Hello!

What you meant by shop=plastic here?

What kind of plastic objects are they selling there? Are they really selling solely plastic objects?

Is maybe one of shops listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop a better fit?

Sorry for asking about truly ancient edit but maybe you are still visiting this area or remember it...
joyvious324 (2015-04-26 05:54:25+00:00): Hey, please do not reclassify the road. See http://dpwh.maps.arcgis.com/apps/OnePane/basicviewer/index.html?appid=aa0330b374c34466a0afafded5926280
joyvious324 (2015-04-26 06:08:35+00:00): changeset reverted.
joyvious324 (2015-04-26 05:54:29+00:00): Hey, please do not reclassify the road. See http://dpwh.maps.arcgis.com/apps/OnePane/basicviewer/index.html?appid=aa0330b374c34466a0afafded5926280
joyvious324 (2015-04-26 06:06:56+00:00): changeset reverted.
joyvious324 (2015-04-26 05:54:32+00:00): Hey, please do not reclassify the road. See http://dpwh.maps.arcgis.com/apps/OnePane/basicviewer/index.html?appid=aa0330b374c34466a0afafded5926280
joyvious324 (2015-04-26 06:04:57+00:00): changeset reverted.
joyvious324 (2015-04-26 05:54:36+00:00): Hey, please do not reclassify the road. See http://dpwh.maps.arcgis.com/apps/OnePane/basicviewer/index.html?appid=aa0330b374c34466a0afafded5926280
joyvious324 (2015-04-26 06:01:42+00:00): changeset reverted.
aharvey (2018-04-29 09:54:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3477989701 same question about isced level 0
aharvey (2018-04-29 09:55:12+00:00): ditto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251561861
mrpulley (2018-04-30 11:48:00+00:00): ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58552383
4rch (2015-04-26 22:46:51+00:00): Hello, please do not add overlapping ways.
Gazer75 (2015-06-30 18:20:20+00:00): 651 Volda-Nordfjordeid is still a national highway and thus a trunk road. Please revert this change.
Nate Wessel (2015-04-28 04:13:40+00:00): Is it in the future if the infrastructure is already finished and in place? Or should it be a route relation (presumed active) that brings the stop into existence?

Can a bus stop exist without a bus? Would it matter if that bus were in the past or the future? Would it demand a location between both?

I'm not really asking so much as having fun with ontology. Your tagging is probably more correct :-)
Minh Nguyen (2015-04-28 05:24:02+00:00): I figured that OSM-based public transit routers would have no way of knowing that the stops have no service yet. The poor hapless users would be waiting far longer than the standard Metro wait…

For context, I was getting a bit fed up with the many under-construction and proposed BART and Muni stops that were tagged as being complete:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30491130

I’m definitely open to more specific tagging, though. `railway=fingers_crossed` ;-)
Minh Nguyen (2015-09-22 18:39:08+00:00): After tagging enough “empty” VTA bus stops in San José (with a shelter or bench and a Bus Stop sign that lists no routes), I’ve come around to the idea that the magnificent new streetcar shelters should be tagged as real stops that don’t yet belong to any route relations.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 07:22:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3478154649/history

Hello!

What you meant by shop=plastic here?

What kind of plastic objects are they selling there? Are they really selling solely plastic objects?

Is maybe one of shops listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop a better fit?
KJSime (2015-04-26 07:43:46+00:00): Satellite imagery suggests more likely a Track than Unclassified Road; single lane, v narrow in some places.
dolphinling (2015-04-26 08:05:09+00:00): I don't know anything about railways, so it's possible things are wrong here. In particular, I'm not sure the track tagged as the main route is correct (but the old one managed to start at one track and end at another with no valid path between them...)
NickBolten (2015-04-26 08:10:20+00:00): Forgot to comment - these paths no longer exist, likely permanently, due to construction.
Mazezito (2015-04-27 00:36:24+00:00): Toda a área do monte da penha esta em Rua Pedomal
hguimaraes (2015-04-27 07:43:48+00:00): Originalmente estava como floresta, mas ontem ao fazer o "buraco" da zona pedonal em volta da igreja, dupliquei essa área no JOSM para o multipoligono e não reparei que alterou a tag.

Obrigado pelo aviso.
domdomegg (2015-04-26 08:24:52+00:00): Wrong description, this time moved service road, postbox and couple of bus stops to correct locations. Source: survey.
4rch (2015-04-26 11:06:15+00:00): Hello Hélène Draux, this is not an highway. In fact it is a stream.

Regards, Arch
Hélène Draux (2015-04-26 11:28:44+00:00): Thanks!
4rch (2015-04-26 14:37:43+00:00): Hello harsham, when you select a building and press "s" in the iD-Editor you can make buildings rectangular.

Regards, Arch
maxphizik (2015-06-03 09:09:24+00:00): Ты зачем на населённые пункты вешаешь landuse=residential?
uks (2015-06-03 13:25:27+00:00): А чего в этом плохого? Земля, используемая в небольших нп, используется для частных жилых построек, поэтому landuse=residential подходит. На большие нп я этот тег не вешал, т.к. там могут быть индустриальные зоны.
maxphizik (2015-06-03 13:38:01+00:00): А Устюг? Если тебе лень обводить реальные жилые кварталы, пользуйся слоем MapSurfer.net или Спутник, там отображаются границы НП. Не порть данные карты!
maxphizik (2015-06-03 13:49:59+00:00): Или например Гляден, половину которого занимает речка, а из оставшегося примерно поровну делят поле, ферма и собственно жилая зона. Это я всего два НП посмотрел.
uks (2015-06-03 14:21:10+00:00): Насчёт Устюга согласен, там можно было и не наносить landuse на контур с place. Хотя во многих местах в Европейской части России наносить landuse на контур с place - обычная практика - и не важно, речка там проходит, или ферма находится. А вот детально обводить реальные жилые кварталы в каждой деревне у меня физически не хватит времени (во всяком случае, в ближайшем будущем)
maxphizik (2015-06-03 14:27:00+00:00): Зачем вносить информацию не соответствующую действительности и которой невозможно пользоваться? Если кто-то делает неправильно, повторять не надо.
maxphizik (2015-06-03 14:37:23+00:00): В древние дремучие времена некоторые дикие люди вешали landuse= residential на полигоны place потому, что полигоны place не рендерились на мапнике, но это нарушает одно из основных правил OSM - не мапить под рендер.
uks (2015-06-03 14:40:19+00:00): В первом приближении можно допустить, что та же речка и луг с фермой в Глядене (которые, кстати, не отмечены) относятся к landuse=residential. Во втором приближении уже можно отмечать детали.
maxphizik (2015-06-03 15:00:32+00:00): Может ты даже знаешь способы применения так "точно" отрисованной жилой зоны? Или наличие landuse=residential добовляет полигону place какой-то дополнительный сакральный смысл?
maxphizik (2015-06-03 15:27:04+00:00): Луг это landuse=meadow, ферма landuse=farmyard, а болото вдоль речки natural=wetland, и всё вышеперечисленное никак не относятся к жилой зоне.
uks (2015-06-03 17:28:36+00:00): Вот когда кто-то будет подробнее отрисовывать, тогда будет и meadow, и farmyard, и всё что угодно. А пока подробной отрисовки там нет, в первом приближении можно оставить residential как место то место, где живут люди. Мне лично residential нисколько не мешает, так же как и многим другим пользователям.
maxphizik (2015-06-03 17:35:53+00:00): Место где живут люди как раз обозначается тегом place, а landuse используется уже для более точной отрисовки, а раз точной отрисовкой землепользования тут и не пахнет, то и делать этим тегам на этих полигонах нечего.
maxphizik (2015-06-03 17:39:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:place
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
smaprs (2015-04-26 18:51:42+00:00): Ok, seems you're pretty exact and absoultely formal according to the rules. But considering the situation, couldn't it be usefull for identifying possible unidentified and isolated affected areas, considering help on directing humanitarian mapping efforts and searches around major affected areas?
smaprs (2015-04-26 19:25:45+00:00): By the way, take a look at the request at HOT:  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/2015-April/008085.html
Hjart (2015-04-27 22:03:36+00:00): Vær opmærksom på at veje skal forbindes korrekt for at routing kan fungere. Det stykke track du har lavet er ikke forbundet hverken i den ene eller den anden ende. Se punkt 5 i http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1
jl88 (2015-04-26 10:57:09+00:00): Apotheke und Maler existieren nicht mehr.
kayle (2015-04-27 06:43:10+00:00): Ahoj, vitaj v OSM. Pozerám že si pridal Sádok. Čo je dobre, nakoľko chýbal. Ale možno by sa k tomu viac hodilo place= hamlet alebo ešte lepšie place=suburb, nakoľko to je časť Klátovej Novej Vsi, miesto place=village. Viď http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
kayle (2015-04-27 07:02:16+00:00): Čo to je za objekt? OttoP1?
OttoRi (2015-04-27 07:18:02+00:00): Ahoj, včera som bol bol prvýkrát na mape, chcel som si len pre seba zobraziť nejaké pozemky. Ako to vymažem prosím Ťa?
Skúsim naštudovať niečo, len teraz niet času. Ďakujem
kayle (2015-04-27 07:26:04+00:00): Ach tak. Mal som podozrenie že to bude niečo súkromné/pokusné, nakoľko to okrem mena nemá žiadny iný tag. Takéto objekty sa na mape nevykreslia, nakoľko "vykresľovač" body/cesty s neznámymi (alebo žiadnymi) tagmi ignoruje.

Zmaže sa to nasledovne, priblížiť mapu na objekt. Vybrať "upraviť" hore v ponuke. A keď sa v iD klikne na čiaru, tak sa zobrazí ponuka okolo kurzora. Je tam smetiak. Kliknúť a potom uložiť.

Ak budú nejaké nejasnosti/otázky stačí sa opýtať.
OttoRi (2015-04-27 07:27:33+00:00): Díky, už som to vyhodil
kayle (2015-04-27 07:44:59+00:00): A ešte jedna drobnosť, čo sa začiatočníkom bežne stáva pri kreslení čiar. Pozor, aby sa nestalo ako napr. v tomto prípade že plocha tej oblasti, je spojená s plánovanou cestou, s ktorou nemá byť spojená. A opačne, ak sa pridáva nová cesta (napr. odbočka medzi domy) tak aby bola spojená s cestou.
OttoRi (2015-04-27 07:48:00+00:00): Ďakujem
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-27 11:52:24+00:00): Kolego, popsułeś granicę gminy Wągrowiec: http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=2854237 
Naprawiłem.
Przy okazji - restrykcje, które dodałeś tu i ówdzie są źle zrobione i nie zadziałają. Zapraszam na forum lub do wiki.
4rch (2015-04-26 21:09:24+00:00): Hello, tracktype grade1 means asphalt.The following way clearly hasn't an asphalt surface: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340629331

Also it isn't a track, it's to small therefore.

Regards, Arch
yopaseopor (2015-04-27 15:38:00+00:00): It was a mistake .I have done it with a preset of JOSM , and I forgot to erase tracktypes (also I put track because I was not sure about the wide or the quality of the track so I put track to make it clear it has to be reviewed.

Thank you for your review
yopaseopor
village (2015-12-29 18:20:22+00:00): (english version below)
Wie lässt sich das Problem sauber lösen?
1. Relation (Hauptgebäude und alle Flügel) Burg (outer, inner)
2. "über-Relation" die die Burg und den Enno-Narten-Bau zusammenfasst?

oder "einfach" als 2. die zur Burg gehörende Fläche markiert und auch mit name=Burg Ludwigstein markieren?

english:
how to solve the oddities of this "bad" multipolygon?
1. create one multipolygon only for the main building (containing 1 inner and 1 outer member)

2. create a "super-relation" containing both the main building and the Enno-Narten-Bau?

or better as 2nd mark the castle's area and tag it with name=Burg Ludwigstein?

any ideas?
MarcoR (2015-12-29 20:15:39+00:00): First of all, I am not an expert ;)

In case of "castles", I try to map following the [school](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool) method:

1) A big closed way with historic=castle, name=foobar and other tags which belong to the castle entity (e.g. tourism=attraction, barrier=wall,etc.)
2) Other things inside the above area, but independent, with the proper tags (e.g. buildings, pedestrian ways, gardens etc.); the multi-polygon, in my humble opinion, should be used only here.

Please be advsed: historic=castle is not rendered by Mapnik, so my method is a little bit frustrating for the mapper who looks behind at his/her work :P
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-21 05:54:26+00:00): Everything looks ok to me.  Just missing what type of 'cuisine' they serve. ;)  See: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-21 05:54:43+00:00): And welcome to OSM!
ViriatoLusitano (2015-04-27 14:57:50+00:00): Olá Silva1989, queria desde já agradecer pelo teu excelente trabalho e contributo na Horta e nos Açores em geral.

Portugal precisa de mais membros activos como tu!
AmyCupcake (2015-04-26 15:05:43+00:00): does the footpath http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173768356 end before Moss Way?
gethyn85 (2015-04-26 15:14:53+00:00): Yes - I've tried to follow it before.  I tried from Moss Way this morning and couldn't get to it on a proper path.

I've not changed that route today - just added the path that links it to Owlthorpe Grove
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-11 23:44:27+00:00): Dear Kryptonit: what is this?  It's tagged a standalone bicycle tool stand, but seems to be the size of a building?  Does it have a name or website?
lcat (2015-04-26 16:12:18+00:00): там сейчас не сеют и не пашут, на северном поле началась застройка квартала
maraf24 (2015-04-29 19:04:15+00:00): Wycofane. Powód: usunięcie urzędowej nazwy części miejscowości.
Ergo (2015-08-02 13:46:19+00:00): Приветствую. Что-то riverbank пропал на одном из участков Матыры. А соседний участок рендерится нормально. Вы не в курсе, как это могло произойти? :)
11daf (2015-08-05 06:11:48+00:00): выправил, теперь корректно отображается?
Ergo (2015-08-05 09:57:12+00:00): Да, сейчас гораздо лучше. Благодарю :)
11daf (2015-08-05 16:57:02+00:00): А произойти это могло от того, что хороший человек под именем Calcio48 23 дня назад своим любимым редактором Potlatch 2 порушил в пакете правок 32588750 этот riverbank. Писать ему, думаю, бесполезно. Проблема в инструменте - очень неприятный баг https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4879 давно известен разработчикам.
Ergo (2015-08-06 10:23:36+00:00): Прошу прощения, что ошибочно озадачил вас этой проблемой. Прекрасно, что всё выяснилось. Вдвойне благодарен вам: сам нескоро бы нашёл причину. Таки попробую побеседовать с автором правки.
11daf (2015-08-06 10:47:53+00:00): Нет проблем. Всегда рад помочь.
Endres Pelka (2015-05-13 21:25:22+00:00): This is landuse=residential, not building=house!
ralf74ks (2015-04-26 16:48:39+00:00): Lidl hat seinen Supermarkt hier vor einiger Zeit geschlossen, der Name Lidl steht nicht mehr am Gebäude dran.
Eine Bäckerei gibt es hier schon viel länger nicht mehr.
Und der Elektronikmarkt ist mittlerweile von Euronics.
adrianojbr (2015-08-22 22:48:10+00:00): olá badoo. tudo bem? percebi que você modificou a classificação de várias ruas de "residential" para "unclassified". de acordo com as instruções do wiki, especialmente em http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:How_to_map_a, entendo que a melhor classificação para elas é residential. você concorda?
ozgurakyazi (2023-01-05 15:09:03+00:00): Hallo tanjeff,

ich sehe,  dass du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340681507#map=19/50.07676/8.23026 turn:lanes als left;through|through|through;right eingetragen hast. 

Was muss man tun, um links abzubiegen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39895697#map=19/50.07710/8.23003 geht nicht.   Außerdem ist es nicht erlaubt von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340681503  nach https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144243652 zu fahren. Kannst du es bitte checken?

Viele Grüße!
tanjeff (2023-01-07 21:32:50+00:00): Die Kreuzung wurde umgestaltet, und es kann sein, dass die Lane Infos inzwischen veraltet sind. Ich werde das in nächster Zeit mal überprüfen und korrigieren. Danke für den Hinweis!
Endres Pelka (2015-05-13 20:28:10+00:00): What's this supposed to mean? That's no building.
4rch (2015-04-26 18:19:00+00:00): Hello Peter, Bing imagery is heavily distorted in this area. Please do not align the paths with Bing imagery.

http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/#16/28.3514/84.8967&num=4&mt0=mapnik&mt1=google-map&mt2=bing-satellite&mt3=google-satellite
Deanna Earley (2015-11-11 09:51:05+00:00): Thank you for your contributions, but you also changed a lot of service roads into residential roads.
Please be careful to select appropriate tags and make sure you only change what you mean to.
Thanks.
dikkeknodel (2018-04-13 06:50:12+00:00): Hallo Pudu,

Du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4835843 den Note 'Pt 1521 - Urzlenboden' gegeben. Was meint Pt 1521 hier, dass ist kein Name der Wegweiser habe ich gestern gesehen. Wenn ich den Wiki folge (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/HikingNetwork#Recommended_tagging_2) dann soll die Route van der eine nach den andere Wegweiser mit Name laufen. Das soll dann vielleicht Wildspitz sein.

Was denkst du?

Liebe Grüsse, dikkeknodel
Pudu (2018-04-15 18:27:25+00:00): Hallo dikkeknodel
Da hast du ein altes Changeset von mir gefunden. In meiner Anfangszeit von Wanderweg-Markierungen war ich der Meinung, dass ein Weg eigentlich nur eine Wanderweg-Relation haben sollte. Deshalb habe ich die Relation von diesem Wanderwegweiser aus gemacht.
Ich habe die Relation nun angepasst, so dass sie vom Wildspitz zum Urzlenboden geht.
Danke für deine Hinweise und nicht nur ein stilles Ändern!
Liebe Grüsse Pudu
dikkeknodel (2018-04-16 10:02:10+00:00): Danke für die Erklärung, ich habe selber sicher auch gleiche alte Changesets :-).
muralito (2015-04-27 00:02:57+00:00): ¿Que poblacion tienen Buena Nueva?