piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bxl-forever (2022-09-10 16:59:35+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for the recent changes.

I noticed you fill some extra tags for POI on the database.  Perhaps it’s because you are using the iD editor, which automatically offers several text boxes.

In Belgium, we should *never* fill the postcode and municipality.  Those zones are automatically generated on the map.

Also, if the cafe (or anything) is located within a building that has a single address on it, like this one, you don’t even have to fill the street name and housenumber either, because those tags will be automatically assigned to the POI too.  (If people search an object on the database, it will return the correct address even if the address is not set on the POI itself.)

It’s not your fault, I see it’s very tempting to fill every box.  This is because the iD editor was designed to be used in every part of the world.

Hope this helps.
MarkpageBxl (2022-09-10 17:22:08+00:00): Thanks for the input, I had no idea and indeed just assumed that needed to be filled in. I'll go back on my changes and clean up the mess.

Just one question though, in the edge case where a (corner) shop has its entrance (where I would put the POI) at a different place than it's official mail address (typically on the other side of the corner), would it make sense to put the POI address to indicate the entrance?

Thanks again.
bxl-forever (2022-09-11 16:11:31+00:00): Thanks for writing back.

Two things here: I saw that in newer edits you’ve just started removing EVERY address from the map (example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2620319603/history)

I want to repeat:
* If the shop is located inside a building that has a single address, THEN (and only in that case) there isn’t any address on the shop.
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4841958843 is good because the restaurant is inside building with housenumber 32)

* Consequently, if the shop is located inside a large building with multiple address, you SHOULD put an address on the shop (street and housenumber only).
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10008817173 is bad because the building has no address, since there are 3 addresses here: 18 20 20A)
bxl-forever (2022-09-11 16:12:27+00:00): To answer your question: do you have an example of a shop with such an address?
MarkpageBxl (2022-09-11 17:48:32+00:00): OK, thanks for bearing with me, still new to all this. I'll try to do better.

The corner shop example is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9470106767 ; the official post address is on Avenue Sainte-Alix (where the bank it replaced was situated), but the entrance is on the Parvis Sainte-Alix side.
MarkpageBxl (2022-09-11 18:10:41+00:00): Reading through your handbook for newbies, I'm sure that will come in handy. Thanks a lot for that!
VictorIE (2023-09-28 03:55:49+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2588326171/history

What does "Noord" refer to in this name?

Is it an alternative language?
luky89 (2024-04-23 06:11:38+00:00): Hi vakulya, I would like to kindly ask you what you used as a source for these changes. What I know most gas pipeline lengths in Slovakia have 4 pipes and most oil pipeline lengths in Slovakia has 2 pipes. I asked because I would like continue in your work. Underground oil and gas pipelines can be identified on land changes and sometimes the pipelines appear to be offset from reality on the map.
user_2061200 (2022-09-10 22:51:04+00:00): Sorry, kon dit niet normaal wijzigen, browser werkt niet altijd goed mee en kan het niet via een andere manier wijzigen. bij voorbaat dank dat je dit goed hebt opgelost.
Famlam (2022-09-11 12:38:44+00:00): Geen probleem, graag gedaan!
eggie (2022-09-10 19:56:42+00:00): Dag Flakkeeenaar..
Je vraagt feedback.. wellciht accesstags toevoegen aan sommige paden 
access=private

De serviceroad tzv de begraafplaats eindig op een stukje highway=path? 
Mag je hier rijden.. Is het openbare weg?

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-10 17:40:18+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomst mail ontvangen. Bij deze Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-10 17:45:04+00:00): Tip Eigenlijk zou de de hoofdrijbaan op slot 'moeten' zetten met bicycle=use_sidepath
Tenminste de gedeeltes waar de fietspaden lopen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-10 18:53:03+00:00): bicycle=use_sidepath toegevoegd
jumbanho (2022-09-29 15:54:36+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edits to improve OSM.  In this and some other changesets you have added a "access=private" because a street sign says private.  I assume this is one of the green signs that indicate the street name?  These signs indicate that the road is privately maintained and not maintained by the city/state, while the access tag indicates that no one is allowed on the street unless given prior permission by the owner.  In many cases, this is not true of privately maintained streets and is not implied by the green sign having a "private" on it.  

Typically access will be determined by other signs, like "no thru traffic" (access=destination) or "no trespassing" (access=private).
jumbanho (2022-09-29 15:55:57+00:00): Also, there is an ownership=private tag that you can add for these roads.
sargasso cheesefunnel (2022-09-29 18:02:29+00:00): Ahhh-thank you for this clarification. I tried to figure out the right way to do this and obviously couldn't find it. I'll have to go back through these and correct them then. Some of the ones I edited did indeed have no trespassing signs (and one is actually just an overgrown two track covered in poison ivy and kudzu :)
jumbanho (2022-10-03 15:36:34+00:00): Thanks for responding and fixing.  If you have any questions about these subjects, there are two friendly online communities for discussion:

OSM-US Slack discussion group
https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

OSM community discussion:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Also, feel free to dm me.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-12 03:43:55+00:00): Why did you delete WAY: 451930838 ??? this is vandal!!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126022848
MUHAMMED`sab (2022-09-12 04:38:15+00:00): Hello
According to the corrections I made until today, it is clear that I am not a vandal

This was a mistake
Sorry
Thank you for your attention
LockOnGuy (2022-09-12 04:59:09+00:00): Deleting the highway used by people who get in or out of the capital city is pretty much vandal. Here in OSM we always assume good intentions but this? no, this is major.       
 I'm going through your edit history and I'm seeing too many errors and "mistakes".      
 I gave your team too many notes on how to map in my country and it improved a bit but still, too many errors, some are very critical and quite dangerous too for navigation.     
 If you want to edit here in a foreign country to you that you don't have the local knowledg in, you need to be more cautious.        
With your feuture edits, keep in mind that I'm watching.      
Peace.
MUHAMMED`sab (2022-09-12 05:39:35+00:00): Thank you for your time
And thanks for the review

I hope we won't get into trouble again

I will edit more carefully from now on

Sorry
and thanks
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-30 08:55:17+00:00): Vilniuje nėra adreso Vaižganto 9... Tai  Narvesenas Vašingtono skvere negali turėti tokio adreso.
Vaidotas (2022-09-30 09:14:42+00:00): Adresą nurašiau iš https://narvesen.lt/#parduotuves . Jei numerį nuimsim, ateityje kažkas gali vėl papildyti informaciją iš "oficialaus" (bet nebūtinai tikslaus) šaltinio. Ta pati problema gali būti ir su kiosku prie stoties "Sodų g. 24 D-1". Kitose vietose, pvz. prie Žaliojo tilto kioskai naudoja arčiausiai esančių pastatų adresus. Kaip tinkamai šią problemą išspręsti?
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-30 10:32:14+00:00): Taip, suprantu. Kažkada centre buvau radęs ant namo realiai uždarytą numerį, kuris realiai neegzistavo. Žmonės tiesiog pažiūrėjo, kad šalia tarkim 10A ir 10B ir užsimetė patys 10C :-D
Na tai vietoj tokių išsigalvotų (arba kitais atvejais egzistavusių, bet dabar nebeegzistuojančių) adresų dedam adresą, kuris realiai yra arčiausiai.
Jei kažkas iš kur nors uždės neegzistuojantį adresą (Boltas mėgsta tą daryti) - tai per kitą adresų sutikrinimą rasim ir vėl pataisysim :-)
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-30 10:33:02+00:00): Kitas variantas būna „kampiniai“ adresai, kurių jau virš 10 metų nėra, bet kai kurie nenori niekaip užmiršti.
BCNorwich (2022-09-11 07:34:08+00:00): Hi, Way: Tambaram Kizhakku Puravazhi Salai (1093397185) is in quite a poor state after these changes, warnings were given above.

Way: Tambaram Kizhakku Puravazhi Salai (1093397185) now drags other roads out of alignment, cutting some off, and leaving others unjoined.

Could you please correct these problems? Need any help just ask.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2022-09-10 17:48:28+00:00): Waar je de fietspaden had losgemaakt zaten de delen van de hoofdrijbaan niet meer aan elkaar. Ik heb het hersteld.
Let goed op dat de delen aan alkaar blijven zitten als je iets losmaakt.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126022738

MVg
eggie
HellMap (2022-09-10 17:14:06+00:00): See also my comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125074466
user_2066394 (2022-09-10 21:36:03+00:00): Warum wurde der nördliche Abschnitt der Simseestraße gelöscht?
IT-Aicher (2022-09-10 22:16:24+00:00): Wurde wieder eingesetzt - Sorry!
Besagter Pfad begann mitten in der südlichen Kurve und hatte einen Schreibfehler ;)
ququruzka (2022-09-19 08:03:17+00:00): так вона "уліца" чи "вулиця" ? 

Виправьте будь ласка.
user_6110846 (2022-09-19 14:04:32+00:00): виправив
user_1566574 (2023-04-02 20:51:25+00:00): Salut !
JOSM me sort une erreur concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2418517 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28277895.

"Le chemin extérieur répète le tag de la relation : amenity=college"
Vu que tu as changé le nom du chemin + rajouté l'attribut, je voulais savoir ce que tu en pense. :/
Merci !
Diabolo68 (2023-04-04 20:39:16+00:00): Salut Antonin
Il ne me semble qu’il n’y a pas de réel consensus pour cartographier les écoles avec plusieurs campus.
Pour être honnête, il n’y a pas beaucoup d’infos sur le sujet et je suis d'accord pour dire que cette méthode n'est pas parfaite.
Il y a 7 mois, j’ai cartographié plus correctement les campus utbm. Avant, les tags les concernant étaient mal regroupés (par exemple les campus de Belfort et Sevenans avaient exactement le même nom ; celui de Montbéliard ne partageait pas du tout les mêmes infos, etc.)
Utiliser une relation multipolygone avec amenity=university semble adapté.
J’ai analysé d’autres cas en France et dans le monde avec Overpass et il semblerait que se soit bon comme c’est actuellement (ex : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4519842, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6581631).
Il ne s’agit que d’un avertissement dans JOSM qui n’est pas spécifique à ce tag et je ne pense pas que se soit problématique.
Je reste à ta disposition pour en discuter ou si tu as d’autres questions sur mes modifications.
user_18267930 (2023-08-30 16:05:26+00:00): Hab den Weg als privat gekennzeichnet. Hat genug Touris in die Irre geführt.
eufive (2022-09-11 10:27:21+00:00): Updated a restaurant
Oregonian3 (2022-09-10 17:45:39+00:00): This changeset downgraded US 89 between WY 89 and UT 30 to primary, upgraded US 30 between US 89 and I-80 to trunk, upgraded the WY 89/UT 16 corridor between I-80 and US 89 to trunk, and upgraded the UT 30 corridor between US 30 and US 89 to trunk.

US 30 between I-80 and I-15 is the best route to Pocatello and Idaho Falls from most places to the east or southeast via I-80. I believe that these are big enough cities that they should be served by trunk routes from all major destinations.

UT 30/WY 89 between US 80 and US 30 is, similarly, the best route to Logan from the east. I believe that Logan is also a large-enough city that it should be served by trunk routes from all major destinations.

WY 89/UT 16 forms the best route from Salt Lake City to Jackson. Jackson, in contrast to Logan and Pocatello, I don't think is a big enough city to need to be served by trunk routes from all destinations. However, Salt Lake City and Boise are the closest major cities to Jackson, and I believe that Jackson is important enough that the routes from these two cities to it should be trunk (the route from Boise via US 26 already is).

US 89 between UT 30 and WY 89, in contrast, only forms the best route between Logan and Jackson. I don't see this as an important-enough connection to warrant trunk status.
user_5359 (2022-09-11 13:36:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1093405280. What is the meaning of the tag landus3 = grass? Did you mean surface = grass?
Andreas König (2022-09-11 13:42:10+00:00): Hallo, 
you are welcome to correct such small and obvious single typing errors without any such discussion. 
Andy
user_5359 (2022-09-11 13:51:48+00:00): A small typo would be landuse=grass. Based only on the value it is a bigger error, see https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=Grass#values
Andreas König (2022-09-11 14:04:45+00:00): I have absolutely NO understanding for such "small scale criticism" By the way this error will have no consequences at all, because the tag is invalid and will not be shown on any map. If this is a "bigger error", i do not know... I am not inclined wasting my time on such useless discussions. And by the way I am not that unexperienced in editing. So correct it yourself or or leave it until I or someone other changes.  
I think, your discussion did not improve OS at all buit cost at leasr 200 changes in edit time. It is not about You. EOD.
WoesteHugo (2022-10-27 14:26:46+00:00): Mag je ISO8601 dates gebruiken bij conditionals? Dacht dat je per se de opening_hours spec moest aanhouden
eggie (2022-09-18 13:01:26+00:00): Hier routeert het niet meer naar behoren.. Svp geen access=no gaan taggen op paaltjes.
Dat betekent een algemeen Verboden Toegang. 
Loop svp je edits nog eens langs. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-18 13:03:15+00:00): motor_vehicle=no ook niet gaan toevoegen aan fietspaden.
Het is funest voor de routering. 
Denk aan moped en mofa.. In OSM zijn dat motorvoertuigen.
In de verkeerswet natuurlijk niet.
MVG
eggie
user_2066394 (2022-09-10 22:29:10+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/4625398358
Der Baum wurde umgesägt?
RedAuburn (2022-09-13 12:11:14+00:00): Nicely done, thank you! 😄
mueschel (2022-10-05 17:13:13+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, it got a strange 'Dragon' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10013723953
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
ruugie (2022-09-12 19:24:42+00:00): Great work. May you please remove the "bad quality" indicator source=npe afterwards?
Russ McD (2022-09-12 19:52:24+00:00): Yes, I usually change the source to Streetmap or Bing after each section .... guess I must have missed one !
MishellCatucuamba (2024-05-23 21:28:36+00:00): ¿Cuál fue la edición que se realizó y la fuente que se uso?
Richard (2022-09-11 12:27:53+00:00): Wait what how did I make this span an ocean. Sorry.
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-10 19:40:41+00:00): Tag: shop=hurtownia_i_sklep_/_montaż_i_naprawa jest niepoprawny. Więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:shop?uselang=pl
LockOnGuy (2022-09-11 04:00:01+00:00): Changeset comment should've been: clean up, revert and delete spam, low quality, duplicated nodes, private maps-me bookmarks, not allowable sources, and fake names/not accurate edits
flohoff (2022-09-14 11:42:10+00:00): Moin,
das maxspeed=7 ist hier falsch. Im Gesetz für den Verkehrsberuhigten bereich d.h. Zeichen 325 sagt: "Schrittgeschwindigkeit".

Die 7km/h waren EIN Gerichtsurteil von vielen. Es gibt auch 3 und 5km/h. 

Alles was highway=living_street ist - also Verkehrsberuhigt, sollte kein maxspeed tragen da es keinen rechtlich korrekten numerischen Wert gibt. 

Flo
Rainchild (2022-09-14 16:23:35+00:00): Das ist die Geschwindigkeit, die die Polizei hier kontrolliert hat. Daher sollte es bei 7km/h bleiben, auch wenn es Autos aus Bayern gibt, die nicht so langsam fahren können....
flohoff (2022-09-14 16:32:32+00:00): 
Du willst also etwas taggen was vor anderen Gerichten nicht stand hält, nirgends im Gesetz steht, und auch nicht durch Schilder nachweisbar ist?

Das widerspricht den OSM Grundsätzen der "Ground truth" - Dinge müssen nachvollziehbar sein für andere. Die 7km/h stehen nirgends. 

Und das living_street KEIN maxspeed bekommt sagt dir sogar der JOSM editor - Der wirft einen Fehler vor dem Hochladen und sagt du mögest das bitte entfernen. 

Hier auch der Wiki Artikel von OSM zum Thema living_street:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street

Zitat:

Deutschland

In Deutschland sollte keine zusätzliche Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung mittels maxspeed=* gesetzt werden. Die offizielle Geschwindigkeit ist in der StVO mit Schrittgeschwindigkeit angegeben. Alle numerischen Werte entspringen einer uneinheitlichen Rechtsprechung.
Rainchild (2022-09-14 18:25:27+00:00): Andere Gerichte interessieren nicht: Im Schwarzen Weg wird die max. Geschwindigkeit von 7km/h von der Polizeit kontrolliert. Vor dem zuständigen Amtsgericht Steinfurt hat es meines Wissens bisher *keinen* erfolgreichen Einspruch gegen ein entsprechendes Bußgeld gegeben.
Also sind die 7km/h im Zuständigkeitsbereich des Amtsgerichts Steinfurt rechtlich verbindlich.
Rainchild (2022-09-14 18:39:40+00:00): "Alle numerischen Werte entspringen einer uneinheitlichen Rechtsprechung.":
Rechtsprechung Steinfurt: 7km/h 
q.e.d.
flohoff (2022-09-14 18:42:35+00:00): 
Rechtsprechung ist für den konkreten Fall irrelevant. Wir bei OpenStreetmap tragen kein maxspeed bei Living_Street ein.

Wenn du dir überlegst hier mit zu machen ist das die Regel. 

Andernfalls wird es jemand anders wieder löschen.

Du kannst das als netten Hinweis und eine Chance zu lernen annehmen oder nicht.

Flo
Dino Michelini (2022-09-11 19:36:47+00:00): Ciao, ti segnalo che le correzioni sulle geometrie fatte ricalcando le immagini satellitari di Bing non sono precise come quelle di Esri o le ortofoto del PCN (immagini più precise addirittura di un rilievo GPS fatto con smartphone. (vedi wiki di OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_practice#Allinea_le_immagini_aeree_prima_di_ricalcare; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Esri; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Italy/PCN; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Test_the_accuracy_of_GPS_devices). Poichè l'area è stata mappata in precedenza utilizzando immagini Esri, ortofoto PCN e rilievi GPS corretti in post-processing, queste correzioni sulla posizione non hanno molto senso...  Prima di fare un ricalco da Bing, per evitare errori simili, sarebbe opportuno verificare quale base geometrica (immagini/ortofoto) hanno utilizzato in precedenza altri mappatori.
Niiepce (2022-10-01 23:53:55+00:00): Hallo Nordpfeil,
Super, dass du hier einige Tags korrigiert hast.
Aber bitte nimm dir nächstes Mal ein kleines bisschen mehr Zeit beim Korrigieren, denn du hast im Raum Würzburg mehrere Tags zu species:de geändert, was zwar anhand der vorherigen Tags plausibel erscheint, aber inhaltich auch beim Sesselmappen auffallen sollte, denn es ist eine Gattung also genus:de (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiefern). Auf diese Art und Weise wird das Fehltagging dann leider nur schwerer zu finden und es ist also keine wirkliche Verbesserung.
Zwar muss man beim Sesselmappen immer etwas vorsichtiger arbeiten, aber trotzdem finde ich es super, dass du dich solchen Taggingproblemen widmest.
Viel Spaß weiterhin und Viele Grüße
Niiepce
RicoElectrico (2022-09-10 19:30:45+00:00): Cześć, nie ma potrzeby dawania adresu jako nazwa stawu.  Adres już jest raz zaznaczony na mapie, to wystarczy do jego wyszukania :)

Do poczytania: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_u.C5.BCywaj_tagu_name_do_opisywania_rzeczy
RicoElectrico (2022-09-10 19:29:30+00:00): Cześć, proszę o lepsze opisywanie zmian. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments

Dzięki!
eggie (2022-09-10 19:37:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip Probeer het gebied van je edits wat kleiner te houden.
Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op. Ook zijn je edits lastig te controleren. 

foot=yes / designated hoeft niet te worden toegevoegd aan fietspaden. Ook niet aan een node. 
Het is allemaal default. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126027730



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-10 19:43:19+00:00): foot=designated heb ik van een aantal paden verwijderd. Je hoeft dat allemaal niet te gaan toevoegen. Wat was het probleem in dit speciale geval?
Ook op nodes geen designated toevoegen svp. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-10 19:48:14+00:00): Tip.. EWat wel belangrijk is dat die parallel wandelpaden/trottoirs verbindingen krijgen om over te kunnen steken. Je zit anders op zo'n pad gevangen in de routering.
Mapse
eggie
Frans S (2022-09-19 10:51:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please pay attention to this point:
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Best regards
rohieb (2023-06-04 15:47:43+00:00): Die addr:housenumber sieht seltsam aus… ich hoffe, du hast dein Passwort geändert…? 😬
rohieb (2023-06-04 15:48:17+00:00): sorry, ich bezog mich auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1093435078/
pjotr (2023-06-04 19:17:11+00:00): Hi, danke für den Hinweis ... erklären kann ich mir die Zeilenfolge nicht, es ist  jedenfalls keines meiner Passwörter. Trotzdem vielen Dank! :)
habi (2022-09-18 08:41:15+00:00): Irgendwas ging da kaputt; die Aare ist nicht mehr ein gefüllter Fluss: https://capture.dropbox.com/mp8rgapWnrTvUbH3
mcliquid (2022-09-18 10:07:52+00:00): Muss ich mir im Detail ansehen, aber das ist nicht durch meinen edit passiert.
mcliquid (2022-09-18 13:33:26+00:00): Das ist die entsprechende Relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/407984
Die wurde seit meiner Änderung mehrfach verändert. Wo genau das Problem liegt, kann ich gerade nicht identifizieren.
habi (2022-09-19 19:27:21+00:00): Es scheint ein temporäres Problem zu sein, im Moment nur noch bei Zoom-Level 16 und 14 in Teilbereichen der Aare zu sehen.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-10 20:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126029868 where the changeset comment is: Revert test via ipv6 preferred routing - one tree
Joel Amos (2022-11-10 01:52:44+00:00): Thanks for your contributions. Please be mindful of route relations when editing ways. Specifically, this edit left a gap in relation 12534162. iD isn't adequate such edits; JOSM is the way to go in these cases.
chris66 (2023-02-02 22:42:40+00:00): Betrifft Knoten 8674577936:

Wieso highway=motorway_junction?

Das ist doch  keine Autobahn und ausserdem noch gar nicht fertig. :-)
Ropino (2023-02-03 12:32:03+00:00): siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction
--> 
This is usually found along a highway=motorway, but is also applicable to other major roads with numbered/named and typically grade-separated junctions, e.g. highway=trunk or highway=primary.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-10 20:57:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 126029718.
user_5359 (2022-09-27 10:07:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10014154326 (one of sixty nine objects). What is the meaning of the tag dm_ref = "adm_ref=194639". Why don't you just use the key ref?
Infodisiac (2022-09-28 21:22:43+00:00): Hi I advised using admin_ref to Torenkraai following this osmwiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/City_tree_registers 
Copying the key to the value field is clearly a typo, which has been propagated by copy&paste.
If admin_ref is OK with you, we will fix the typos.