piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
avatar6 (2015-11-10 20:42:01+00:00): yeah, u r right. Most .my changesets in my home country Ukraine,  I think I should comment it like that 'изменил имя улиці согласно оффициального перечня горсовета'. ) I apologe if doing smthng wrong for you, but I was trying my best wishes.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-10 20:50:06+00:00): Hi avatar6, with regard to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/375035/history , how did you know whether to use natural=wood rather than landuse=forest here?  On http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest there are four (!) conflicting approaches documented for tagging wood vs forest - it would be interesting to know which one you were using.

Unfortunately I'm not familiar with this particular wood (though I've done a fair bit of mapping just to the west - in the Llanthony valley and around Abergavenny) so I can't really really say much about this bit beyond what you can see from the aerial imagery (which isn't much - some of this obviously planted for forestry, so not obviously).  

Did you think about asking the previous mapper?  Although they mapped it a long time ago, they do still seem to be active.  When they did map it, the contents of the "landuse=wood" wiki page was as follows: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:landuse%3Dwood_%28Don%27t_use%29&oldid=369680 so they can't really be accused of "tagging it wrong" (by the standards in place at the time) either.

OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project; we have to work together to create the best map.  Perhaps if you'd talked to the previous mapper you might have been able to find out which bits of it where deciduous and which bits evergreen, and how much of it is still present (what was mapped 6 years ago doesn't quite match the Bing imagery, and likely of course that might be out of date now too).

Finally, as woodpeck says, "fx lu=wood" really doesn't explain what change you made, why, and what the source of that change was :)
SomeoneElse (2015-11-10 20:51:37+00:00): Oops - typing fail above - "some of this obviously planted for forestry, so not obviously" should have been "... some not obviously".
mweper (2015-11-07 14:41:02+00:00): Hola Griselda. Aquí, pasa lo mismo con la calle San Roque. La etiqueta "ref=* ", se utiliza para las carreteras que son partes de una Ruta Nacional/Provincial/Local y tienen su numeración oficial. Ej. Autopista o Ruta 11.
--
Otra cosa que te aconsejaría, es que marques todo el área de la escuela con la etiqueta amenity=school y agregues allí toda la info, para no duplicar cosas.
--
Más info para agregar escuelas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=school
mweper (2015-11-07 14:35:41+00:00): Hola Griselda y gracias por colaborar.

Quisiera saber porque a la calle Simón Bolivar le agregas el número 342. Si la calle tiene un nombre alternativo, debes agregarlo con la etiqueta "alt_name=Calle 342", sin las comillas y dejar el nombre actual o el que aparece en los carteles cono "name=* ".
Cualquier duda, estoy para ayudar. Saludos.
Supaplex (2015-11-07 06:59:51+00:00): 綜大?
zool (2015-11-07 21:22:19+00:00): This changeset contains another fictious and damaging contribution to the map - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378864130 

Mappers in Greece have attempted to get in contact and to reach out in an attempt to help, but it does not appear, lookin gat your recent edits, that you wish to help create an accurate map of the world. 

There are too many changes to examine each on its merits and your edits are causing upset to others in the community in Greece. We at the Data Working Group plan to go ahead with a mass revert of your contributions. Please take this up with data@osmfoundation.org if it is a genuine problem for you.
maraf24 (2015-11-08 09:36:46+00:00): Otwarcie w grudniu. Dałem disused:
dgitto (2015-11-29 04:51:41+00:00): Ciao antonio02m,
ehi gli alberi sono natural=tree, non leisure=park
eheh
Peilscheibe (2015-11-07 18:00:01+00:00): Ich habe dieses changeset rückgängig gemacht. Du hast hier sämtliche Attribute des POI weggeworfen (wie Öffnungszeiten, Küche etc.), das kann gar keinen sachlichen Grund haben. Was ist die Intention hier?
GeorgeKaplan (2024-10-06 08:10:56+00:00): Bonjour, 
Le Parc Économique de la Cassine ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378873417/history ) est toujours en travaux depuis 9 ans ?
Corneto (2024-10-06 15:12:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Hélas oui toute la zone prends beaucoup de retard. Qui plus est des gens du voyage se sont installés durablement sur les parcelles qui avaient été démolies.

Le projet est quant à lui toujours en cours : https://www.chambery-grandlac.fr/parc-activite/cassine/
https://www.chambery.fr/actualite/5329/140-futur-quartier-de-la-cassine-bilan-de-la-concertation.htm

Cordialement
Supaplex (2015-11-14 17:14:39+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Henri97 (2017-11-08 18:58:57+00:00): Warum wurden die ganzen Bäume gelöscht?
dikkeknodel (2019-05-06 18:58:03+00:00): Hi balducien, 
You added a turning loop in this changeset. It wasn't connected to the actual highway however but just floating loose. Be sure to always connect this with a highway node.
I've done so now
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69948172
MKnight (2015-11-25 11:35:21+00:00): Moin.
Das geht so leider nicht. Wenn Du Strassenteile in Busrelationen einfügst, dann mach das in _bestehende_ Strassen. 
Das ist jetzt das 2. Changeset, wo zufällig drüber stolpere, wo Du entweder Strassen neben andere gemalt hast oder "alte" Strassen mitsamt ihren Eigenschaften gelöscht hast und neugemalt. Ohne die bisherigen Eigenschaften.

Ich bin gerade dabei mir weitere Changests anzuschauen und werde ggf. alles rückgängig machen.
MKnight (2015-11-25 12:17:30+00:00): Ich hab das mal ins Forum gebracht zwecks weiteren Vorgehens/ Korrekturmöglichkeiten:

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52800
sorcrosc (2015-11-07 12:46:54+00:00): Attenzione, i percorsi che hai tracciato dovrebbero essere connessi tra loro, possibilmente anche con il resto della rete stradale...
Nancy Sande (2015-11-07 11:30:57+00:00): agregue un comercio que me resulta interesante como referencia para ubicsr  el establecimiento escolar.
vogelfreier (2015-11-21 21:40:45+00:00): #neazki: landuse=residential is ok
see: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
SomeoneElse (2015-11-12 15:11:59+00:00): Hi - just for info, I've "undeleted" the building that the post office was in in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35263431 .  The thing that makes it appear as a "post office" when people look for one in the data is the "amenity=post_office" tag rather than the "building=yes" one, so people looking for a post office won't get confused and come here, they'll be taken to the new one on Littlemoor Road.
Hope you don't mind - just trying to help - and any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Cheers,
Andy.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 12:55:37+00:00): I know that it's annoying when new editors struggle ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32994765  ), but they've only made 7 edits, even though they were over 4 months.  Maybe an offer of help*, asking what they're trying to do, would be a better approach than "I've reverted this changeset...."?
*preferably from a local mapper in Italian, of course.
tyr_asd (2015-11-07 18:55:07+00:00): Hm. I think you're right. I should have phrased my comment better. :-/
mueschel (2015-11-08 13:52:03+00:00): Hallo HMari,
falls es noch keiner gesagt hat: Willkommen bei OSM!
Ein kleiner Hinweis zu diesen Änderungen:
Der richtige Key für die Zahl der Sitzplätze ist einfach "seats", nicht "number of seats". Das findest du auch im Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbench
Vielleicht möchtest du das noch korrigieren?
Viele Grüße, Jan
Hjart (2015-11-07 12:00:39+00:00): Når man ser på gps-sporene i forhold til kørebanen på ortofotos er der nu ikke voldsomt meget forskel. Det drejer sig kun om nogle få meter og herude gør det vel ikke så meget. Det er mest på pylonerne man for alvor kan se parallaxe fejlen.
MarkusHD (2015-11-08 11:41:57+00:00): Aber die Hausnummer 67 existiert aber sicherlich weiterhin.
openblogger (2015-11-10 15:26:35+00:00): Hausnummer existiert wieder. Wurde von mir jedoch nicht wieder hinzugefügt. Werde dies in Zukunft jedoch berücksichtigen.
MarkusHD (2015-11-11 09:39:28+00:00): Ja, ich hatte den gelöschten Punkt wiederhergestellt inkl. Historie.
MarkusHD (2015-11-08 11:49:43+00:00): Baulich sieht das zwar aus wie ein Mini-Kreisverkehr, aber verkehrstechnisch ist es keiner, es fehlt das entsprechende Verkehrsschild: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/275418946
openblogger (2015-11-10 15:27:38+00:00): Mini-Kreisverkehr wurde aufgehoben. Ist jetzt wieder nur noch eine normale Kreuzung
MarkusHD (2015-11-21 21:12:35+00:00): Diese Änderung ist mir jetzt durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35464287 erst aufgefallen. Das ist keine Korrektur, wenn hier die Tags entfernt werden, die die Kirche als solche auszeichnen - ganz im Gegenteil.
MarkusHD (2015-11-08 12:38:37+00:00): Fehler in der website beim Bürgerservice.
openblogger (2015-11-10 15:28:30+00:00): Fehler wurde behoben.
TagaSanPedroAko (2016-01-01 10:10:05+00:00): Looking over other roads with the Primary tag, this would be Trunk rather than Primary, as it is the most important road among the other Primary roads (Quirino Avenue/P. Diego Cera Avenue, CAA Road, Marcos Alvarez Avenue, and Investment Drive and Daang Hari). How it can be Primary. Is it due to the designation (secondary)?
seav (2016-01-02 12:48:25+00:00): If Alabang-Zapote Road is trunk, then Sucat Road should also be trunk as they are both equal in importance. But 2 trunk roads in southern Metro Manila looks out of place.

In addition, I think trunk roads in metropolitan areas should be longer. Alabang-Zapote Road just connects Alabang to Zapote and is not much more important than Buendia is. Besides, traffic along Alabang-Zapote Road is generally local and not long-haul compared to EDSA and C-5 which are undeniably trunk roads.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 14:59:40+00:00): Did you manage to work out what the mapper was trying to map here?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378759449/history looks like it might have been an attempt at a bus route to me .  As I'm sure you're well aware, there are lots of other problems in this area - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377730157 for example and also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-co/2015-November/thread.html .
maraf24 (2015-11-07 15:15:36+00:00): The whole city looks like playground for me. Many important roads were destroyed and replaced with long road which indeed looks like bus routes. Some were deleted by the same user or its alter ago. Did you notice there are few more users, all registered on September the 4th, which do similar dubious edits?
It started with alfonsoce, but he didn't answer and stopped editing, instead others started doing his job. How does it look for you?
Regarding this changeset-this is one way, it could be easily restored.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 15:32:23+00:00): To me it looks like a school project - I've just posted this to the local list:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-co/2015-November/003924.html

It'll all need fixing of course (so thanks for doing that!) but I suspect that it'll all happen again next year unless the local OSM community can liaise with the teacher who's running the course.  

It'd also be nice if we could figure out what they were trying to map in the first place and help them map that - but that'd need to be sorted out by people in Colombia.  There are still some issues from last year left, including uppercase street names.
ANDREA PICCA (2015-11-09 19:12:17+00:00): Mi escuela Primaria de Oncativo. La más antigua de la localidad.
andrewsh (2015-11-11 13:03:35+00:00): This doesn't look real; where do the data come from?
Jose Riha (2015-11-14 10:32:11+00:00): Razumiješ li engleski?
MarkusHD (2015-11-08 12:42:35+00:00): Beim W54 ist "description" besser geeignet für den Zusatz. "note" ist nur für Notizen an Mapper.
openblogger (2015-11-10 15:29:14+00:00): Informationssatz wurde von "note" zu "description" geändert.
mueschel (2015-11-08 15:39:32+00:00): Hi GuyVV,
please take care about the spelling of keys, you added a "bridgr" and several "bridg". Software has some difficulties recognizing this as "bridge" ;-)
Cheers, Jan
sabas88 (2015-11-15 13:20:44+00:00): Questa è sbagliata, mi risulta che ci sia un tunnel  da fare a piedi per  raggiungere l'ascensore..
EneaSuper (2015-11-15 13:24:13+00:00): Tranquillo, è mappato correttamente, solo che non si vede bene. Parte da piazza della Meridiana e giunge sino alla galleria Garibaldi :)
sabas88 (2015-11-15 13:31:17+00:00): No, per come l'hai mappato tu sembra che si prenda una funicolare dalla galleria, quando in galleria c'è solo l'attraversamento, 
http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/08/fc/55/27/ascensore-di-castelletto.jpg

Quello di piazza portello idem
http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/39371340.jpg
EneaSuper (2015-11-15 13:38:44+00:00): Mmmhhh si hai ragione, ma in questo momento non posso occuparmene (sono da smartphone) :/

Sei comunque libero di metterci mano :)
GerdP (2015-11-23 09:37:35+00:00): Hi there!
I've noticed that you tried to fix the mess 
that was produced by some unexperienced mappers. I've done a few more changes to
make routing work again.
Open problem remains open:
"Avenida Canal Bogota" is mapped with 4 parallel ways, like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/310037613
I think two should be enough in most cases, but Bing images are out-aged and I am not a local.
Do you know more?
ZeroJeden (2015-11-09 11:12:20+00:00): Intryguje mnie po co ktoś wstawia na mape obiekty poprzemysłowe, które są od kilku lat regularnie wyburzane, a przeze mnie z mapy usuwane w miarę rozbiórek.
Może warto operować na danych o których się ma jakieś pojęcie o ich stanie faktycznym.
kocio (2015-11-10 21:54:08+00:00): Wybacz, nie wiedziałem, że ktoś się tym opiekuje, bo okolica na to nie wskazywała (dużo tam brakowało innych rzeczy).
ratrun (2015-11-10 18:33:41+00:00): Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261017189 and the parallel oneway leading into the other direction: Theses segments are not connected and I can't guess the attached only_straight_on restriction relation.
Jarek 🚲 (2015-11-07 16:55:12+00:00): To clarify, I could not see any trace of the tunnel in person. But I don't know where it used to be, so I might not know what to look for. Also there is no mention in press of it being demolished - so I assume it still exists.
GerdP (2015-11-11 13:56:58+00:00): please review:
What do you mean with these tags?
lanes=2;1
oneway=no;yes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4385012
It seems that you have merged two different roads without adjusting these 
attributes. I am not a local, so I don't know
if the road is a oneway or not and how many lanes are used exclusively by the tram.
NicEd (2015-12-07 21:23:28+00:00): Caro Diogenes,

Eu tambem concordo com o seu ponto de vista. Usar linhas como perimetros de bairros nao e a opcao ideal. Mapear a cidade toda de forma perfeita vai levar um tempo.
spark (2015-11-08 00:04:46+00:00): Hi, the original tagging of man_made=groyne was correct. Please see the wiki pages (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dgroyne and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbreakwater) - these are definitely groynes.
JochenOSM (2019-02-03 15:33:19+00:00): Hallo,
kann die Notiz hier inzwischen weg, oder wird die noch gebraucht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3655305373
Gruß,
Jochen
Ale_Zena_IT (2016-12-12 12:49:05+00:00): Ciao,
per i nomi dei torrenti sarebbe meglio usare la convenzione che dice di usare il maiuscolo solo per le iniziali.

Alessandro Ale_Zena_IT
FvGordon (2016-02-07 14:58:04+00:00): Hi,
es geht um die Adresse auf dem Briefkasten "Holeburgweg 1, 37672 Stadtoldendorf". Hat auch der Briefkasten einen Tippfehler in den letzten beiden Ziffern der PLZ oder nur der OSM-Eintrag?

Franz
marc__marc (2024-09-03 05:24:45+00:00): Hello,
did you remember what's in the whole area ? a camping ?
Regards,
Marc
iWowik (2017-01-11 11:37:21+00:00): Если Мачулищи neighbourhood, то они должны быть в черте другого населенного пункта.
iWowik (2017-01-11 11:38:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3201260412
yaugenka (2017-01-11 17:03:16+00:00): Так и есть же - находится в черте гп Мачулищи.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4755556/
yaugenka (2017-01-11 17:04:39+00:00): т.е. деревня Мачулищи была присоединена к одноименному городскому поселку.
pyram (2015-11-09 21:51:29+00:00): Ich habe den Weg 300042410 wieder so hergestellt, wie es tatsächlich ist. Die Darstellung im BayernAtlas mit "Hubert-Perlitius-Weg" ist (auch) hier falsch! Der Rad-/Fußweg läuft parallel zum Anliegerweg und mündet nicht in diesen...
gsperb (2015-11-10 09:13:55+00:00): Kann sein, doch es ist eine Einheit. Ein neben der Strasse laufender Radweg wird zwar häufig als eigener Weg dargestellt, doch spätestens an einer Brücke wird das Quatsch.
Hjart (2015-11-07 23:50:31+00:00): Please note that there already was a place node for Toftum (180 meters south west of this)
frosm (2019-06-05 13:07:07+00:00): Hello,
what's this ?
a caravan site or only a parking ?
ToniE (2015-11-17 15:13:01+00:00): Hallo Chris,

es schein mir, dass Du  highway=platform bzw. bus_stop bei public_transport=platform oder =stop_position löscht.

Das is m.M.n. nicht korrekt und nicht konform mit http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen/Transportation#Vorschlag_f.C3.BCr_vereinheitliches_Tagging 
wo highway=* "verpflichtend" ist.

Ist da bei/durch Mentz DV was andere definiert worden?

Gruß,
Toni
t_ja (2015-11-08 15:47:20+00:00): Ahoj, z akeho zdroja pochadzaju zakreslene cesty? Pokial je mi zname, tak momentalne sa ziadna cesta ku Vodnemu dielu Zilina nestavia, a este pred tyzdnom boli vsetky polia poorane. Z toho usudzujem, ze minimalne rok sa tam ani staviat nebude. Ak sa jedna len o planovanu vystavbu, treba pouzit tag "proposed": http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
EmBe_SK (2015-11-08 16:07:07+00:00): Ahoj :) upravené
t_ja (2015-11-08 16:26:35+00:00): Sice rychlo, ale len na 50% ;)
Este tam ostalo construction=primary. Dost vela tagov pouziva princip retazenia: highway=construction + construction=primary, alebo turisticky razcestnik: tourism=information + information=guidepost. Cize na pri zmene construction na proposed je nutne zmenit construction=primary na proposed=primary. Inspiracia napr. tu: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130886320
GerdP (2015-11-09 15:13:03+00:00): bitte prüfen:
4 Wege sind wohl versehentlich als 
highway=turning_circle getaggt, scheinen aber Gebäudeteile zu sein:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378961398
Was war da gemeint?
d4nin3u (2015-11-09 18:40:43+00:00): Gebäude verschoben, damit die geographische Position passt
Myazyk (2015-11-08 00:13:23+00:00): Там не тільки авторинок. Ще свійських тварин по суботах продають
ma-rt-in (2015-11-08 14:09:38+00:00): Deine Angaben betreffend des Böhmerkloster´s sind nicht richtig. Zum Beispiel ist das Gebäude für Rollstuhlfahrer geeignet, das es ein Altenheim ist!
Habe es mal geändert
ma-rt-in (2015-11-08 13:57:39+00:00): Poi war schon vorhanden!
Siehe Node 3253276967
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2015-11-08 08:49:39+00:00): Note to self: Osmose "raw edit" nicht mehr benutzen
dudka (2015-11-12 15:33:20+00:00): Вулиця Бірюзова (Донецьк) — була названа на честь Героя СРСР: маршала Сергія Бірюзова
fkv (2015-12-01 13:00:22+00:00): Deine Begründung stimmt überhaupt nicht, denn Google liefert schon auf der ersten Trefferseite mehrere Beispiele für transfer stations, die auch von Privatpersonen beliefert werden können (Girdwood und Central Transfer Station in Anchorage, SWANCC in Glenview) sowie ein PDF der United States Environmental Protection Agency, das erklärt, was waste transfer stations sind, und darin heißt es: " Offers citizens facilities for convenient drop-off of waste and recyclables. Some transfer stations have a designated area, often called a convenience center, where residents drop
off waste or recyclables in collection containers."

Darum revertiere ich diesen Changeset, und ich ersuche dich, nicht dauernd ohne Absprache Objekte umzutaggen, die ich angelegt habe.
sdoerr (2015-11-08 20:35:02+00:00): Oops! Looks like you've accidentally moved a bus stop from Dene Holm Road into the grounds of Northfleet School for Girls.
MARCELA RODRIGUEZ (2015-11-07 23:04:38+00:00): Concurren adolescentes entre 12 y 18 años aproximadamente.
En el mismo edificio funciona el Instituto 805 de ali la confusión en el comentario
SomeoneElse (2015-11-13 22:20:44+00:00): Hola y bienvenidos a OpenStreetMap! Algo salió mal aquí (parte de un aeropuerto de Dortmund fue trasladado), pero he cambiado eso. También he marcado con "Escuela Provincial N ° 7.705" "amenity=school", por lo que los mapas saben que es una escuela y muestran como uno.

(en Inglés)

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Something went wrong here (part of an airport in Dortmund was moved) but I've fixed that.  I've also labelled "Escuela Provincial N° 7.705" "amenity=school" so that maps know that it is a school and will display it as one.
jiazheng (2015-11-07 23:42:39+00:00): PS: 在爬坡之後的路線只是粗略位置，我騎單車在佳園路三段101巷太低看不到Orz
jiazheng (2015-11-07 23:48:07+00:00): 官方公告： https://www.freeway.gov.tw/Publish.aspx?cnid=193&p=6604
Vintagejhan (2015-11-08 14:59:38+00:00): 讚啦~ 有交流道的里程嗎?
jiazheng (2015-11-09 11:47:37+00:00): 新聞都沒寫那麼詳細，我騎腳踏車也不能進去。
唯一的空拍畫面也只有照前半部而已...
https://youtu.be/fqjJMcQzIYo
只能等有人上傳行車紀錄了～
Klumbumbus (2015-11-08 10:48:48+00:00): Hallo und Herzlich Willkommen bei OSM,
Vielen Dank für deine Ergänzungen. Du hast für weite Strecken Höchstgeschwindigkeiten von Bahnstrecken eingetragen. Woher stammen diese Daten?
VG
Klumbumbus
micha4 (2015-11-10 16:25:49+00:00): die Daten stammen aus eigenen Beobachtungen
es gibt daher keine Quelle
EugenyN (2015-11-08 09:27:21+00:00): зачем housenumber памятнику ? это же номер дома.
Strannik-W (2015-11-08 21:55:03+00:00): Я думал, что у можно указывать конкретный адрес у всех объектов. Понял что это не требуется в данном случае. Теги объекта подправил. Больше не буду... Извиняюсь!
EugenyN (2015-11-09 07:14:46+00:00): ок. ничего страшного. по любым вопросам можете писать мне или на форум.  кстати, рекомендую попробовать редактор  http://josm.ru  - это более удобный и мощный редактор. он отлавливает многие ошибки.
Strannik-W (2015-11-09 21:56:39+00:00): Спасибо. С редакторами только разбираюсь... пока опыта мало...
EugenyN (2015-11-10 09:32:21+00:00): пожалуйста.
maxerickson (2016-04-07 15:56:55+00:00): Hi-

The "ref" tag is generally reserved for signed routes. As such, I've removed the "OLD 31" values here. If the route is indeed prominently and officially signed as "OLD 31", it would be appropriate to correct my mistake.

If you added the "OLD 31" values to the ref tag because that makes it show up as little boxes on the map on  openstreetmap.org, take a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer . Data should reflect reality, not be adjusted to get a particular result from one piece of software.

(Similarly, if a route has a ref of "US 31", it is an error to also fill in the name tag with something like "US-31", as that is just the ref, not a name. "US-31 South" would be a name if it were signed as such or well known by that name. The difference is somewhat arbitrary, but there is value in the entire US using similar canonicalizations of information, rather than hundreds of different personal canonicalizations)

Thanks,

Max