piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_6771650 (2020-06-10 12:49:53+00:00): For some context, the statue was thrown into the lake by protestors.
SK53 (2020-06-10 12:56:04+00:00): Looks like it could do with location=submerged & layer=-1 (and possibly wheelchair=no) to bring it in line with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2941119302
user_6771650 (2020-06-10 21:57:55+00:00): 👍
eggie (2020-06-10 13:11:27+00:00): Dag Tony

Je hebt phone=+31..........  laten staan. Haal je die ook nog weg?
Gr Eggie
Tony Melony (2020-06-10 13:16:03+00:00): Slordig van me. Ook gedaan nu.
eggie (2020-06-10 13:06:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
joost schouppe (2020-06-10 13:45:28+00:00): Hoi Lies,
Je edit voegde geen nieuwe info toe, maar ik vermoed dat het probleem hier vlakbij zat:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27671872/history#map=18/50.88153/5.25439
Daar had iemand per ongeluk het wegtype gewist!
Ik heb je toevoeging verwijderd, en die fout hersteld.
Als je problemen tegenkomt waar je niet direct aan uit komt, spring gewoon binnen op ons chat kanaal https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org - het zit daar vol mensen die je graag helpen!
Groeten,
Joost
eggie (2020-06-10 13:49:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

review  access=private zou voldoende moeten zijn .. al die andere tags kun je beter verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-10 13:57:13+00:00): Je steiger heb ik aangepast naar man_made pier
Footyfootfella (2020-11-03 21:14:05+00:00): Hello literan,

I noticed that this road, https://osmcha.org/changesets/86466104/, here is tagged as “motor_vehicle = no” as of June 2020. I noticed in a recent Mapillary track line from August 2020, https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.817233454436064&lng=37.34569229185581&z=17&dateFrom=2020-06-11&pKey=L52dXQ5QERtWWRCPckgLTg&focus=photo, that the road is now in use and accessible to traffic. I am wondering if the motor_vehicle = no tag can now be removed. Thanks!

-Footyfootfella
literan (2020-11-04 21:09:21+00:00): thanx, I will fix this.
eggie (2020-06-10 13:52:05+00:00): .. maar wat is Zandwal Ouder wetering? 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=86466108

waterway=dock?
leisure=playground?
eggie (2020-06-10 13:59:01+00:00): . Wat is hier je bedoeling?
Er staan zoveel tags op en het blijft allemaal onduidelijk. Bij geen reactie haal ik het weg.
Openstreetmap-gast (2020-06-10 14:08:41+00:00): Het is een zandwal er is een plek waar zand ligt en er word aangemeerd door vrachtschepen , dat bedoel ik
Kan je het alstublieft laten staan
Vriendelijke Groet, openstreetmap_gast
eggie (2020-06-10 14:13:44+00:00): Kijk dan even bij man_made=quay  in de wiki
playground zal er dan toch niet bijhoren? 
dock =floating?
Kijk nog een keer svp

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dquay
Openstreetmap-gast (2020-06-10 14:20:36+00:00): 😣
eggie (2020-06-10 14:56:07+00:00): Je speeltuin heb ik weggehaald.. Svp serieus mappen. Je kade heb ik toegevoegd.
Lees je goed in voordat je verdere stappen onderneemt. In OSM kun je niet zomaar wat doen. Je bent ook verantwoordelijk dat het serieus wordt aangepakt. Fouten maken mag. Blijft het een beetje spielerei dan wordt je account ingetrokken.
Check of de naam klopt. Op de opmerking vraag je of er een bedrijf kan worden toegevoegd. Dat heb je nog helemaal niet gedaan. 
MVG,
Eggie
Florimondable (2020-06-21 16:21:26+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai revert le changeset.
Il avait modifié La Seine en L'Yonne.
eggie (2020-06-10 13:53:51+00:00): Beste OSM gast.. Dit is alleen maar een node? Waar is het object. Is hier een bedrijf?
Is dit de juiste spelling sleepboot_isala?
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-06-10 14:02:50+00:00): Wat is je bedoeling hier. Bij geen reactie haal ik het kantoor hier weg.
Openstreetmap-gast (2020-06-10 14:04:32+00:00): Het mag weg hoor ik had een fout gemaakt

Openstreetmap-gast
eggie (2020-06-10 14:14:51+00:00): Verwijderd
BeKri (2020-06-12 11:04:21+00:00): Hallo Dr Diegmüller,
wenn Du Straßennamen ergänzt orientiere
Dich bitte ander Schreibweise in anderen Abschnitten
in diesem Fall und schon öfter:
..strasse wird in Deutschland "..straße"
geschrieben (mit ß)
und auch nicht abgekürzt 
(Veitsteinbacher Str)
Gruss derBeKri
Dr Diegmüller (2020-06-12 13:15:58+00:00): ok
skfd (2020-06-10 15:54:55+00:00): Привет! Ты тут поменял линию воды на дорогу, но по спутнику я вижу что ето таки вода. И переименовал (не полностью) водохранилище. Ты уверен что ето таки не Бучинское водожранилище?
skfd (2020-06-10 16:03:45+00:00): Привет! Частные дома можно отмечать building=house илил ето многоквартирные? )
ElliottPlack (2020-11-11 18:35:17+00:00): Nice work on this project! Any interest in working more on the Chesapeake, removing it from the coastline? A newish mapper inadvertently broke part of your Eastern Bay relation and I've just finished fixing it. It makes me wonder if converting the whole thing to a water relation might make it easier to maintain.
Sparks (2020-11-11 21:47:39+00:00): We can.  There are lots of areas in there that could be broken up and removed from the coastline markup.  I'm assuming that would improve the time fixes would show up and further reduce the time it would take to render coastline.
ElliottPlack (2020-11-12 01:37:03+00:00): That's exactly right. That was the reason we started removing the smaller estuaries from the coastline, so edits to them would show up on the map in a timely fashion. It also helps with cognition of those bodies of water for what they are, instead of big blobs of nothing without a name.

I think the best way would be to start at the Potomac and then work outward, doing big rivers and sub-bays one at a time.
ElliottPlack (2020-11-12 13:55:11+00:00): Potomac is done. The coastal bays along the VA delmarva coast are insanly complex. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11880156#map=11/38.2560/-76.7810
Sparks (2020-11-12 14:18:47+00:00): That was quick.  I was just going to start looking at that.  Yeah, the little bays along the Chesapeake are... complex.  Want to take one side and I'll take the other?  

Is there a better place to communicate than a changeset in NC?  :)
Joseph E (2020-11-21 18:31:15+00:00): Re: "That was the reason we started removing the smaller estuaries from the coastline, so edits to them would show up on the map in a timely fashion”

I’m sorry that the coastline updating process is often broken. It’s unfortunate that managing the coastline polygons is complex and can often be stopped by mistakes around the world.

However, that is not a good reason for incorrectly mapping parts of the sea as natural=water, the tag for lakes and rivers. Pamlico sound is a coastal lagoon with salinity only a little lower than that of the open ocean: according to Wikipedia it’s 20 ppm instead of the 35 ppm of the open Atlantic. This is higher salinity than the Black Sea or the Baltic sea, which are clearly part of the sea. Pamlico sound has large passageways to the open ocean and is strongly influenced by tides and ocean water flow in from the open sea. 

It is comperable to Galveston Bay which also has barrier islands, and is mapped with natural=coastline appropriately. Pamlico Sound is also comperable to the coastal waters of the northern Netherlands and NW Germany, which are mapped as being outside of the coastline (see openstreetmap.de where different colors clearly show the distinction - I’ve also worked on showing this on openstreetmap.org but the PR hasn’t been accepted yet). 
- Joseph Eisenberg
user_5359 (2020-06-10 15:47:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you add a tree_row around the existing node with tree? On the boundary doesn't exist any additional trees.
user_8334278 (2020-06-10 14:04:14+00:00): the fence trail was not there.
luschi (2020-06-10 19:09:16+00:00): Hallo Hanzi_P,

erstmal danke für das überarbeiten der Adressen. Leider hast du dabei das überflüssige addr:country=IT eingetragen.

addr:country wird schon seit langem nicht mehr benötigt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:addr

lg     
luschi
Hanzi_P (2020-06-11 09:52:33+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Info. Habe es bei einigen Adressen gesehen und bin davon ausgegangen, dass es bei den anderen fehlt. Werde es bei Gelegenheit richtigstellen.
Danke und Grüße
luschi (2020-06-11 15:42:45+00:00): Hallo,     
habe das schon gestern wieder entfernt.       
Falls du aber noch weitere addr:country bei deinen Arbeiten auf OSM findest kannst du sie entfernen.

lg
◪ Jarv (2020-06-12 18:35:52+00:00): How come the motor vehicle access has changed from destination to permissive Madeira Drive? (w/165405326)
But remain as destination on the shorter ways off the roundabout?
user_5359 (2020-06-10 15:39:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add some unusally keys to the waterway (https://www.osm.org/way/72012033) on version 12, delete all tags directly (in the same changeset, nice feature of potlach). 
Is there any reason? I assumed a mistake and add the tags
name = Flint River
waterway = river
again. Please check this.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-10 14:20:36+00:00): Rusley, voce definiu esta avenida como tertiary mas ela nem pavimentada é, coloquei como não pavimentada e deixei residential: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453539893/history
eggie (2020-06-10 14:45:02+00:00): Top!
eggie (2020-06-10 14:47:07+00:00): bicycle=designated hoort niet op een fietspad. Het is immers een fietspad. 
Kijk even hier welke tags op de drie verschillende categorieen fietspaden horen
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
rab (2020-06-13 16:14:53+00:00): "fix street due to bad satellite images in this area"
Why don't you just use the more recent maxar imagerie?
Frans S (2020-06-13 17:38:06+00:00): No idea. perhaps focues to much on Bing
Best regards
ianlopez1115 (2020-06-13 10:22:15+00:00): Marked as bad since many buildings were deleted in this changeset. Buildings can only be deleted/removed when demolished or no longer exist IRL. #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86469220
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86469220
Jordi MF (2020-06-10 15:49:21+00:00): Hola,

Gracias por mejorar los datos en l'Eliana. Ten en cuenta que esta zona verde no es una parque. En la wiki de OSM, hay un artículo que define lo que es un parque: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park

Voy a intentar corregirlo y buscar una etiqueta que define mejor este área.
Saludos.
alan_gr (2021-05-30 10:38:20+00:00): Hola Daniel, recien pasé por el landuse=quarry https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814600365 , no parece mucho a una cantera pero desconozco su historia, tal vez sea una cantera que ha sido rellenada?
dcapillae (2021-05-30 13:44:33+00:00): Hola, Alan.

Tienes razón, no parece una cantera. He estado esta tarde en el sitio y se asemeja más a la ladera de un monte convencional.

Cuando añadí la cantera al mapa, lo hice a partir de imágenes aéreas. Me pareció que se trataba de una zona de extracción de áridos. No se veía vegetación, la tierra parecía removida y había varios caminos para camiones. Quizás se utilizase este área para extraer áridos destinados a alguna obra cercana. Actualmente nada hace pensar que allí hubo una cantera. Todavía se aprecia un camino de tierra y parece como si la tierra fuera producto de un aluvión o alguien la hubiera removido, quizás para rellenar una cantera preexistente, aunque no he podido confirmarlo. La ladera está cubierta de vegetación y apenas se diferencia del resto de laderas de los montes.

Yo elimnaría la etiqueta «landuse=quarry». Si más adelante averiguamos que efectivamente se usó como cantera, siempre hay tiempo de añadirle «old:landuse=quarry» o algo similar. A día de hoy y a simple vista, parece una zona natural, la ladera de un monte.

Siéntete libre de remapear y reetiquetar la zona como creas conveniente. Confío en tu criterio.

Gracias por tu colaboración.

Cordialmente,

Daniel
alan_gr (2021-05-30 15:25:49+00:00): Gracias Daniel, estoy de acuerdo que no parece tener uso humano ahora mismo, y que se está volviendo al estado natural del monte que lo rodea, así que lo dejado cómo natural=scrub.
Apolemus (2020-06-10 14:48:33+00:00): Bitte in diesem Änderungssatz nachprüfen, ob die Fährroute richtig in der Relation ist und ob ich was kaputtgemacht habe. Ist mein erstes ÖPNV-Mapping. Danke für den Aufwand!
◪ Jarv (2020-06-12 18:52:00+00:00): Does the path that you have added running beside the A272 actually exist, while I haven't personally been look for it, I'm pretty sure that it is just a grass verge. and the bridge over the stream has vehicle restraint barriers adjacent to the road. Roads are roads, they allow pedestrians on them by default, however routing software typically tries to avoid A & B roads (especially primary routes such as the A272) them unless they have low speed limits (maxspeed=xx mph) and/or pavements (sidewalk=left/right/both)
By adding a path here, routing software will suggest people to walk along here, which certainly isn't a good idea, as there are much better alternatives (I've ended up cycling on the A1 because someone put a cyclepath next to the A1 where there wasn't one for example)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
If you need help understanding this, or anything else with OSM you can always send me a PM
pio2_122 (2020-07-09 11:22:34+00:00): O co chodzi w tej zmianie?
SomeoneElse (2021-07-17 10:27:48+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you added "religion=christian" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290010219/history .  What was the tag that you were intended to add here?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-07-17 10:28:12+00:00): Hallo,
In diesem Changeset hast du "religion=christian" zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290010219/history hinzugefügt. Was war das Tag, das Sie hier hinzufügen wollten?
Freundliche Grüße,
Andy
osm_saint-louis (2021-07-17 14:00:50+00:00): Hallo Andy,
Das war offensichtlich ein Fehler. Danke für den Hinweis; ich habe das korrigiert. (Wahrscheinlich wollte ich die Kirche dort mit dem 'tag' auszeichnen ...). Solche kleinen Fehlerchen könnte man aber auch 'stillschweigend' verbessern ... und gut is'. Mappst Du dort?
Viele Grüße: uli.l
Kovoschiz (2020-06-10 16:36:58+00:00): Think they should be not be "_link", considering the service roads connecting
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86470593
eggie (2020-06-10 15:32:46+00:00): Rik.. Gebouwen krijgen geen adres op de gebouwomtrek. Er zijn al adresnodes.
MVG,
eggie
grnr (2020-07-19 11:24:57+00:00): Wieso sind die Wege durch den Hippengrund (und der Rotkäppchenweg) als gesperrte Wege markiert worden?
Die Wege sind außerhalb der Kernzone, klar sichtbar und in einem begehbaren Zustand (vor wenigen Wochen). 

Laut Nationalparkverordnung müsste die Nutzung der Wege also zugelassen sein.
Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (2020-07-20 07:31:47+00:00): Danke für deine Nachricht!
Laut offizieller Karte geht kein Weg durch den Hippengrund: https://www.nationalpark-saechsische-schweiz.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/06-Brandgebiet-Blatt-02.pdf
Dieser Weg ist aber noch erkennbar (wurde früher genutzt/angelegt), im Gelände sollte ein schwarzes Kreuz am Wegeingang stehen, das das Betretungverbot kennzeichnet. Es kann aber sein, dass es abgekratzt wurde...das kommt leider gehäuft vor in letzter Zeit.
eggie (2020-06-10 15:36:25+00:00): Beste retailadvies.. wat waren je edits hier?
Het commentaar bij je upload ontbreekt. 

MVG,
Eggie
user_10576885 (2020-11-17 14:22:40+00:00): Bedrijf opgeheven aan Schoolstraat 8 Hapert.
eggie (2020-11-17 15:35:22+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk... bedankt voor je reactie.
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-10 16:55:24+00:00): Dag Rik... het adres op de buildingshape  beter weer verwijderen. We gebruiken alleen adresnodes van het Kadaster.
Kijk je nog even?

Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-10 17:17:07+00:00): Het adres heb ik van het gebouw gehaald.. Volgens de BGT is 49 het pand ernaast. 49 kwam nu 3x voor.
Gr eggie
Rogoyski (2022-10-08 17:21:29+00:00): To było gdzieś uzgodnione? IMHO obszary MSI nie zasługują na takie wyróżnienie.
syntex (2025-07-03 23:28:47+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że jednak są na tyle ważne i widoczne w terenie, że zasługują.
Rogoyski (2025-07-04 18:58:21+00:00): Widoczne w terenie tak, ale jednocześnie całkiem nieważne ;) 

Dobra, zostawmy to archeo.
user_2066394 (2020-06-10 16:51:47+00:00): der changeset-kommentar ist sehr allgemein, es geht ja konkret um eine litfaßsäule
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
gscscnd (2020-06-10 16:25:42+00:00): Na obrys budynku (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814615026) można przenieść wszystkie dane adresowe z punktu <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4565350482>, a następnie ten punkt usunąć. Poprawione w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86472959>.
limes11 (2020-06-11 16:44:35+00:00): Hallo, 

ich habe die Werkstatt als shop=bicycle hinzugefügt, es ist ja nicht das Gebäude, das diesen Namen trägt. Wie sind die Öffnungszeiten? Nur einmal die Woche für ein paar Stunden, wenn ich mich entsinne. Verkaufen die Räder? Vermutlich nur second-hand. Ich habe da nur einmal kurz reingeschaut, weiß das nicht mehr. Wäre gut, hier noch ein paar Details hinzuzufügen.

Danke und Grüße, Limes
gscscnd (2020-06-10 16:23:21+00:00): Odpowiednie wartości tagu building byłyby bardziej przydatne niż opisy w tagu name. Poprawione w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86472875>. Zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name> i <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building>.
aceman444 (2020-06-20 21:45:52+00:00): Zdravim, boli ste pri tejto nabijacke, ked pisete zdroj "knowledge" ?
A typ nabijacky (tesla supercharger) sa znaci prislusnymi znackami, pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station , nie do 'name'.
aceman444 (2020-06-20 21:48:31+00:00): A vlastne znacka socket:tesla_supercharger=6 tam uz bola, cize Vasa zmena bola dost zbytocna a chybna.
fukejs (2020-06-22 06:53:14+00:00): Na místě jsem nebyl, ale vím o ní. Není žádné tajemství že tam je :-)

Co se týče doplnění názvu, inspiroval jsem se u podobných nabíjecích stanic v Rakousku https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5473777157 , kde je název také uveden v name.

Nejsem si jist, nakolik, je vaše připomínka oprávněná. U běžných čerpacích stanic se také uvádí v poli name např. "OMV" - třeba zde to je u stanice, kterou jste editoval osobně https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/245241018#map=19/48.13180/17.11957 .

Takže si myslím, že použití "name" není chyba, jak tvrdíte. Možná v něm spíš mělo být "Bratislava Supercharger", podobně jako je tady "Zvolen Supercharger" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3945274091 . Tak je uváděn i na webových stránkách Tesly https://www.tesla.com/cs_CZ/findus/location/supercharger/bratislavasupercharger . Upravím takto.
aceman444 (2020-06-22 08:44:37+00:00): No ale OMV je nazov firmy celej cerpacej stanice, nie je to "Cerpacia stanica benzinu". "Tesla Supercharger" je nieco medzi nazvom a typom objektu, ktory sa da vyjadrit inymi znackami. Tiez si vsimnite, ze u cerpacich stanic sa zadava aj brand a operator.
Ano ak ma Tesla stranku s nazvami stanic, doplnte tak ako pisete, a bude to vyriesene. Mozno by ste potom mohli zadat aj znacku website. Dakujem
fukejs (2020-06-22 08:54:23+00:00): Upraveno, díky.
gscscnd (2020-06-10 16:19:57+00:00): 1. highway=footway to droga/ścieżka wyłącznie, być może w tym przypadku lepszy byłby tag highway=path.
2. Ścieżka powinna być połączona z drogą <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203394065> (chyba, że nie ma tam przejścia). Poprawione w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86472687>.
meded99 (2020-08-26 15:40:27+00:00): This footpath used to have signs saying cycling prohibited , will check again in the next couple of days.
ovruni (2020-06-10 17:32:31+00:00): Hola
Gracias por contribuir en OSM. En esta edición se agregaron múltiples vías sin etiquetas. Por favor utilizar el validador[0] de JOSM para corregir futuros errores antes de de subir sus cambios al servidor.
Para cualquier consulta puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:JOSM/Validador
◪ Jarv (2020-06-12 18:44:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM Hop Scotch. May I ask you to add a comment to the changes sets please, it makes it easier for others to see what's been changed.
I am fairly familiar with path you added called "Open Glade", however I haven't seen it ever on the ground, nor on a map (as a PRoW). What is the source of this trace (GPS, aerial imagery etc) and what is the source of the name (sign, map, personal knowledge etc).
Also what are the access permissions on this path? Is it public, permissive, private etc?
I'll also make some comments on your other changesets too, I'm not trying to scare you off (last thing I want to do), I just want to make you aware of the standards (which unfortunately aren't straight forward) to ensure the map reflects the ground and access permissions in the best possible way.
Tomas Straupis (2020-06-10 20:51:07+00:00): What is happening here? Why are duplicate tags are added? amenity=embassy is enough. Have you done any local survey?
WOOO (2020-06-11 21:14:40+00:00): Hi Thomas, the tag amenity=embassy is deprecated and replace by office=diplomatic, diplomatic=embassy/consulate/consulate_general etc etc. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dembassy
Changing automatically is likely not possible as the new tags offer more clarity on the exact type of of diplomatic office (ergo you need additional information to make this change). I added the target=LT to this embassy to indicate this embassy is target to Lithuania and at the same time updated the other tags based on the existing name in OSM ...embassy..., and the fact the embassy is located in the state capital (so it is unlikely that it is an consulate), I double checked with the website of the British government. 
N.B. as openstreetmaps.org does show an nice flag symbol when amenity=embassy is used and does not show this symbol (only as small blue dot, if the new tags are used I have left the existing tag in place. This is suboptimal so later the amenity=embassy tags should be removed. Will try to figure out who can fix this rendering "issue" on openstreetmaps.org. 

P.s. have added the url of the British government website with details about this embassy to the tags.
Tomas Straupis (2020-06-12 04:57:18+00:00): Things which are written in wiki are not always true. amenity=embassy is NOT deprecated and there is no point for it to be deprecated. Usage of it in main OSM data visualisation shows it. This is why we in Lithuania do not see any point of using duplicate tags. From IT perspective it is wrong/harmful to both mappers as well as data consumers to introduce duplicate tags.
SK53 (2021-11-10 13:23:59+00:00): Hi,

I noticed that you changed the foot route through the hospital to the tram stop from highway=footway to highway=corridor and removed the correct indoor tagging. These tags were chosen for a specific reason: the route through the hospital is a much shorter interconnection that going round the outside which is what routers now do.

Fortunately I haven't needed to catch a tram in a hurry recently, but this change disables my ability to check how much time I have in hand.

Jerry aka SK53
doublah (2021-11-10 19:44:59+00:00): That's unfortunate but I don't believe in tagging for the router
Baloo Uriza (2020-06-10 17:12:07+00:00): South Walnut Avenue works better than S. Walnut Ave. because computers have a hard time expanding abbreviations but can easily create abbreviations if desired.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86472516
Baloo Uriza (2020-06-10 17:06:54+00:00): No abbreviations in names and addresses, please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86472542
BeKri (2020-06-11 11:42:52+00:00): Bitte auch hier:
amenity=Fahrradständer hama ned ;-)