piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Karol_S (2022-07-02 19:59:07+00:00): Fakt, nieelegancko i nieprecyzyjnie mogło to być zmapowane. Dosyć dawno to było robione. Przejdę się po tym i zmapuję dokładniej w wolnej chwili 😅
B_KSL (2022-07-02 20:41:43+00:00): To jest całkiem przyzwoicie zrobione. Powiedziałbym, że dokładnie, precyzyjnie, naprawdę fajnie. Jedynie te tła. Rozumiem, że chciałeś sobie po prostu ułatwić i przyspieszyć. Ale zasadniczo nie nakładamy ani nie przecinamy obszarów. Jeśli coś jest łąką to raczej na pewno nie jest równocześnie lasem albo grassland nie jest stawem itd. Najbardziej elegancko zrobisz to multipolygonami. Reszty (w obie strony) nie dotykam. Poprawisz jak zechcesz i znajdziesz czas. I będzie lepiej...
miłej niedzieli
GinaroZ (2022-06-30 10:48:25+00:00): Why have you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428462927 to a path?
achsaw (2022-07-01 03:29:28+00:00): Hi GinaroZ,
Thankyou for reviewing my changeset. I have modified the Unmaintained track road to path based on aerial images, OS OpenMapLocal (2022) and driver feedback as sources. Incase you want me to change back to track , please let me know I'll make the changes from my end. Thank you again, always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
achsaw
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:44:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ovruni (2022-06-30 04:54:16+00:00): Hola "Alfonso emilio mendocilla", he notado que en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han eliminado objetos sin motivo aparente, por lo que he restaurado los objetos. Por favor use el texto del conjunto de cambios para indicar información relacionada a la edición realizada, no a lo que usted se dedica fuera del ámbito de OpenStreetMap. Puede encontrar información sobre este en tema en la sección de buenos comentarios de conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
[0]  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
ovruni (2022-06-30 05:24:16+00:00): En caso un negocio haya dejado de funcionar retirar la etiqueta relacionada con el negocio, dejando según sea el caso las etiquetas de edificio o dirección, de esa manera se mantiene el historial. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
elsy1 (2022-06-30 08:26:08+00:00): مورد دیگری از خرابکاری حساب شما گزارش شد
elsy1 (2022-06-30 08:23:56+00:00): درود این تغییر نام های اشتباه به منزله خرابکاری هستند در صورت تکرار گزارش خواهید شد
user_7130456 (2022-07-02 14:31:30+00:00): 没有开工的项目请勿以在建、建设中样式标注出来，对于规划阶段线路不稳定的更不应该画出来
user_7130456 (2022-07-02 14:48:37+00:00): 我真的屌你公龟啦，3号线还好，4号线你画的是什么卵泡东西，还贴到道路画，怕我删得太容易是嘛
user_7130456 (2022-07-02 15:05:52+00:00): 如果想自由发挥幻想，去https://wiki.opengeofiction.net/，哪里可以随便乱画
APneunzehn74 (2022-09-13 06:49:05+00:00): Hallo die Avia Tankstelle, ist doch wohl eher eine Tankstelle als ein Brennstoffhandel? Oder beides? Aktuell ist der Poi als Brennstoff Handel eingetragen, zuvor als Tankstelle. Was ist richtig?
Liebe Grüße APneunzehn74
BigBjrn (2022-09-14 16:34:56+00:00): Servus,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis, das war mein Fehler.
Ist korrigiert.
Grüße
Björn
mueschel (2022-07-01 09:42:39+00:00): Hi,
you added 11 huge areas without any valid tag like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074707163

Could you check that?
AxelRose21 (2022-07-03 06:39:16+00:00): Hello,
I just added some roads that are not connected in order to connect them. That's why I commented on adding paths. I just added a few knots.
Thanks for letting me know and I'll be careful.
AngocA (2024-06-20 04:36:38+00:00): Hi Taklamakan.

I am mapping the Colombian rivers, and I found you mappen a riverbank as highway service: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074409401/history#map=19/4.40149/-75.28762

Rivers in Colombia have different shapes from satelital photos.
TaklamakanDesert (2024-06-21 08:13:10+00:00): Hello Angoca! Investigating the area I agree with you that this does not appear to be a service road, thank you for removing it. Looking at Esri World imagery I do see a potential service road that starts in this area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5040208978) and ends just before the river here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11993185643). What do you think about adding a service road here? I look forward to your response.
AngocA (2024-06-22 01:01:55+00:00): Yes, that could be a service.
TaklamakanDesert (2024-06-25 04:00:38+00:00): Hello Angoca, thank you for responding I will add this feature to the data have a nice day.
abakus_uploader (2022-06-30 22:34:48+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
skyper (2022-08-16 14:07:37+00:00): Hallo osmmob,
bitte lösche im Zweifel das neuer Objekt nachdem Du die Merkmale übertragen hast. Das ist wichtig um den Verlauf (Chronik) zu erhalten.
Habe es korrigiert.
Grüße skyper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:11:47+00:00): Hi,

the relation 13233278 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?
The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent this, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
RicoElectrico (2022-06-30 12:02:05+00:00): Sorry, your Maxar imagery is oudated. I think I asked your coworkers to use Geoportal aerial imagery WMTS which is more up to date in Poland. (you might need to change JOSM map projection to PUWG (Poland) 1992.
RicoElectrico (2022-06-30 12:06:52+00:00): Or, use WMS (on JOSM imagery list there is both WMS and WMTS) which doesn't need changing projection, but can load slowly sometimes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:34:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:21:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:30:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-06-30 06:50:15+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=44.517499%2C-84.598726%2C16.99
ftcat (2022-06-30 08:56:46+00:00): Hi Mar Mar,

Way 1074716174 does not enclose grassland but an agricultural field that will be planted when the rains come in November/December. Where you have marked 'TEMP REF' is a large termite mound. Traditional or 'small scale' farmers practice a form of slash and burn agriculture which results in large areas of deforestation
Mar Mar (2022-06-30 09:20:36+00:00): Hi ftcat,
I am impressed with reaction time as I have started editing this area just a few hours ago. You feedback is very valuable, so I will tag all of those similar artificial open areas as farmland, as you suggested.  The TEMP REF is just a node I create for myself as reference which will be deleted later. Is it coincidence that you seem to know exactly this is a termite mound or do you interpret it by any hint on the imagery?
Keep up the work and thanks again! Mar Mar
ftcat (2022-06-30 09:58:09+00:00): Hi Mar Mar,

I keep an eye on edits in Zambia as there are many poor edits and it is easier to pick them up straight away before there are too many. I just happened to check and saw your edit. I have created a temp changeset (Changeset: 123036964) that identifies termite mounds. Large ones will have a clump of bushes on them as per the one in your edit area, smaller ones may have been cleared by the small scale farmers. The collections of buildings are small family farms. You may even come back to map again in a few years time to find the buildings have all moved, particularly the round mud brick huts as they are temporary by nature and will only last a few years. Rectangular structures will be more permanent.
ftcat (2022-06-30 10:04:18+00:00): Another feature to be aware of is the areas surrounding the streams, these are called 'dambos' locally and are a form of seasonal wetland that are dry grasslands in the dry season that are highly susceptible to wild fires and will have a black appearance, have  look tot he east of where you are mapping
Mar Mar (2022-06-30 10:34:23+00:00): Hi ftcat, very interesting and helpful details. Regarding those "dambos": I imagined they were some kind of wetland but was hesitant to tag them as such, this area seems to dry as to justify it. Can you confirm it makes sense to map them as wetland? Maybe as wet_meadow with seasonal=yes?
ftcat (2022-06-30 13:05:55+00:00): I have mapped others as wetland seasonal=yes but not tagged them as wet_meadow as I don't think that is entirely accurate. They should possibly have their own type tag and perhaps be rendered more as a combination of grassland and wetland. The larger wetlands in Zambia and Central Africa are actually classified as Zambezian Flooded Grasslands, this includes areas such as the Okavango Swamps, these areas tend to be flooded all year round just the extent varying through the season. During the dry season the dambos are more like a dry grassland and in dry years may not even become very wet at all. There are many types of dambo, the ones along rivers being the most common but some are more isolated and may have a temporary pool of water at the low point known as a pan.

Don't be fooled as to how dry it looks in the imagery as most imagery is taken during the dry season April to November, even what appears as scrub may appear as heavily wooded during the wet season. What you have tagged as scrub is not technically scrub, it is more wooded than a typical savanna grassland but not as wooded as a true woodland
Mar Mar (2022-06-30 13:23:44+00:00): Understood, for the dambos I will use wetland and seasonal then. Regarding wood vs. scrub: I am aware it is a difficult distinction and I basically try to distinguish the darker, more dense areas from others, although I know it is very subjective. As you are local I will gladly apply you guidelines but it seems it is not easy for you either. So, please let me know if you prefer me to change any tag and I will make the corresponding correction.
BCNorwich (2022-07-01 06:53:45+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry to say your changes result in several duplicated highways and other highways dragged out of alignment. Thus I've reverted the changeset.

Regards Bernard.
Nearby0051 (2022-07-06 19:50:55+00:00): Moin, 
Der Tag "club=lebensrettungsgesellschaft" passt leider nicht ganz. 
Die Übersicht mit bekanntesten Definitionen gibt es hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:club
(generell sind alle auf Englisch, daher passt der aktuelle auch nicht)

Denkst du es gibt einen besser passenden tag?

Beste Grüße
Jannik
GEO ECLA (2022-07-04 08:38:18+00:00): Merci pour vos contributions. Attention au format des numéros de téléphone : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:phone. Corrections : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123178942
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123031035
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ivanbranco (2022-06-30 11:06:34+00:00): Hi Surcrose,

I saw you just edited this place name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3048801807/history

but the place has no specific value, just a generic "yes", since you changed its name I guess you know what kind of place it is so we can fix it with a proper place value? :)
Piskvor (2022-06-30 13:08:33+00:00): Sorry, but that's incorrect. Karlštejn the town (OSM relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/436155#map=14/49.9284/14.1997 ) consists of Poučník on one side of the river ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/435177#map=15/49.9268/14.1687 ) and Budňany ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/431918 ) on the other. All of it is named Karlštejn (although technically that was originally just the name of the castle). Towns and villages tend to have subparts with a name different from the larger entity.

Wikipedia is nice and all, but don't treat it as The Absolute Truth: it's "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit," like OSM is for maps.
Eino81 (2022-06-30 13:28:10+00:00): OK, you don't believe Wikipedia, fine, then come here and ask any Czech, what is the name of that place... The whole. I live in Prague, cc. 40-50 km from Karlstejn. Even the board at that place says "Karlstejn", no-one calls that Budnany... If you don't believe me, just search for it in mapy.cz: https://en.mapy.cz/zakladni?x=14.1802724&y=49.9415306&z=13&source=muni&id=3601&ds=1 

For "Budnany" you will get only this: https://en.mapy.cz/zakladni?x=14.1833322&y=49.9365075&z=16&source=area&id=21418&ds=1
Piskvor (2022-06-30 13:49:48+00:00): Having lived and worked there for several years, I believe I *might* have some knowledge on this. The whole town is Karlštejn ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/436155#map=14/49.9284/14.1997 ), the part on the right-hand side of the river is Poučník, the part on the left-hand side is Budňany. (Similarly, there's a whole city named Prague nearby, but there are multiple city *parts* with different names. The larger entity exists, and the smaller ones also. No need to rename either of them just because *you* haven't heard of them.)
Piskvor (2022-06-30 13:50:40+00:00): Also, what mapy.cz says is not a matter of inclusion in OSM, as the license isn't compatible.
Piskvor (2022-06-30 13:57:50+00:00): Poučník: https://vdp.cuzk.cz/vdp/ruian/katastralniuzemi/663743
Budňany: https://vdp.cuzk.cz/vdp/ruian/katastralniuzemi/663719

Together, forming the town of Karlštejn: https://vdp.cuzk.cz/vdp/ruian/obce/531316
Piskvor (2022-06-30 14:03:02+00:00): You were perhaps mistaken by the subdivision. The larger area is indeed Karlštejn, and it is named correctly, here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/436155
Eino81 (2022-06-30 14:25:05+00:00): Yeah, I see... It is weird, that we have also the whole, Karlstejn, and the two subdivisions, since the Wandrer.earth map uses the two subdivisions... It gets the data from Openstreetmap, that's why I wanted to check it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:11:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Bastiieeen (2022-06-30 08:03:14+00:00): J'ai les photos de la zone prises par drone si besoin de confirmation...
Taksine (2024-09-15 10:14:33+00:00): 是哪个尼泊尔地图写的中文“俄宗巴岗”？你是怎么得到这个中文名的？
James Xia (2024-09-16 09:36:55+00:00): 拉丁文名Ngozumpa Kang来源于尼泊尔地图，“Ngo”在藏译汉里通常用“俄”。
nevw (2022-07-01 03:15:19+00:00): Hi
private roads do get mapped on private land.
You are expected to add access tags and/or gates to such roads if known instead of deleting another's mapping.
They may be also accessed by utility maintenance vehicles.
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-30 09:11:00+00:00): Čia kažkas negerai vyksta. Miško kraštas pažymėtas kaip miško kelias... Kas yra bandoma padaryti?
Farras (2022-06-30 08:16:45+00:00): To be honest, country-wide changeset box is inevitable when you're also updating that country's admin_level=2 relation.
Akrimullah (2022-07-04 02:41:30+00:00): nice update
Leo Slager (2022-06-30 22:03:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mcliquid (2022-07-03 12:43:32+00:00): Befindet sich die A.S.E. Ebner & Partner GmbH in Wien oder in Landshut? Also entweder ist hier die Adresse falsch oder der Eintrag liegt Luftlinie 316,92 km falsch. Schaust du dir das nochmal an?
mtmail (2022-08-15 14:05:27+00:00): Auf https://www.ase-edv.eu/impressum/ stehen zwei Adressen. Habe jetzt die Landshuter statt der Wiener eingetragen.
Baltzingo (2022-06-30 08:35:49+00:00): Este puente en su origen fue románico, una inundación lo daño y no se rehabilito (se construyo uno de hormigón). Es probablemente el que aporto  el nombre a todo el barrio de Zubiaurre o Zubiarrealde.
Dodko (2022-06-30 10:12:09+00:00): Do značky addr:housenumber sa dáva súpisné/orientačné
addr:conscriptionnumber je súpisné
addr:streetnumber je orientačné
Neri_Stupava (2022-06-30 11:19:48+00:00): Ďakujem veľmi pekne
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-07-14 16:07:17+00:00): Betyder det at Gudenåparken ikke længere er proposed?
osmviborg (2022-07-14 17:31:24+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/Bc77ESF
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-07-15 14:13:33+00:00): Så burde de ikke tagges som proposed.
osmviborg (2022-07-15 17:20:42+00:00): Et vejnet der i april måned tydeligvis er nyasfalteret, hvorfor foreslår du at det skal tagges proposed?
parsd51 (2022-07-15 18:07:28+00:00): Rettes det med 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123660741 ?
osmviborg (2022-07-15 18:20:40+00:00): 🤷
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-07-20 23:10:29+00:00): Jeg tror at det var 1043387748 jeg havde bemærket havde highway=residential,proposed=residential.

Så jeg ville bare vide om det betød at den var færdig, for så skulle proposed=residential fjernes. Og det er sket siden.
Allison P (2022-07-10 05:12:27+00:00): URLs should not have tracking parameters. They are useless. Also, this one has a Google Maps tracking parameter. Can you explain why?
theMETAVERSr (2022-07-10 05:47:32+00:00): i don't know? i typed in the website as it is written on their business card, and then copied and pasted that from when the website popped up.
MxxCon (2022-07-10 05:55:57+00:00): Right...on their business card they would write "https://up-in-smoke-dispensary.business.site/?utm_source=gmb&utm_medium=referral" The whole freaking thing instead of just the domain?! Mind showing proof of that business card?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-08-05 09:28:37+00:00): 已被其他编辑者于 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124303543 回退
BasicMaster18 (2022-08-09 05:38:44+00:00): Der bisherige Name "An der Pforte" ist tatsächlich der richtige (steht vor Ort auf den Straßenschildern). Magst du die Änderung rückgängig machen? Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3305074
juminet (2022-07-01 06:51:20+00:00): Bonjour, 

Bravo pour cette première contribution très complète à Virton!

Bonne continuation !

juminet
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-08-05 09:28:01+00:00): 已被其他编辑者于 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124303543 回退
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Mundilfari (2022-06-30 21:11:43+00:00): Hey there - can you explain what's going on here? Why are you breaking up the turn lanes and retagging part of them as if they didn't exist (not just in this changeset alone)? The turn lanes starts(!) way earlier, it's not just the couple of feet separated by a solid line immediately before the intersection ...