piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigpoint (2015-01-30 12:51:26+00:00): You appear to have copied names wholesale for OS Streetview, with no regard for accuracy of the data.
Have you visited the area and checked that 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3166474023 is actually still a farm.
Neither is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3166474035 particulary isolated being about 2 minutes walk from a bus stop and 10 minutes walk from the pub. 
OS Streetview names are historic and have no particlar use in OSM, other than to possibly use them in the addr:housename tag.
Supaplex (2014-11-04 16:41:29+00:00): 嗚，不小心刪到里界囉
Supaplex (2014-11-05 04:12:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26563086
已經協助恢復了
Lars Runte (2025-12-04 20:57:57+00:00): Korrekt wäre Büren-Ahden
flohoff (2014-11-07 18:10:38+00:00): Hi,
du hast in dem changeset ref= und name= auf Roundabouts verteilt. Das ist falsch. junction=roundabout führt nicht den ref und den name der anliegenden Straßen weiter. name und ref auf dem roundabout sind name und reference des Kreisverkehrs nicht der einer abgehenden Straße.

Flo
naoliv (2014-11-05 10:51:23+00:00): Nando, estes pontos são bairros?
nandocastilho (2014-11-05 18:53:02+00:00): Sim, inclusive eu tenho as plantas digitais, mas não sei como inseri-las.
naoliv (2014-11-05 20:30:27+00:00): Esses bairros precisam ser do tipo place=suburb ao invés de landuse=residential como você colocou. Eles já foram corrigidos pelo mapeador Wololo.
Esses mapas possuem traçado de ruas e tudo mais? De onde eles são?
nandocastilho (2014-11-06 17:19:01+00:00): Sim, são mapas completos enviados à Prefeitura de Presidente Prudente para aprovação. Nestes casos, já foram todos aprovados e alguns até implantados já.
naoliv (2014-11-06 17:24:09+00:00): Seriam os mapas daqui? http://www.presidenteprudente.sp.gov.br/site/central_mapas.xhtml
nandocastilho (2014-11-06 17:27:55+00:00): Exato, esses mesmo.
Nick Poulis (2014-11-04 14:35:56+00:00): Updated area for school
adjuva (2014-11-09 00:18:10+00:00): Moin, moin!

In den Schlüssel addr:country gehören nur Großbuchstaben und keine Kleinbuchstaben.

Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr

"Der zweibuchstabige ISO 3166-1 alpha-2-Ländercode in Großbuchstaben. Beispiel: "DE" für Deutschland, "FR" für Frankreich, "IT" für Italien."

In Schlüssel opening_hours hat 'Mo none-none' nichts zu suchen. Das Gewollte wird mit 'Mo off' ausgedrückt.

Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Dort (und auch auf der englischsprachigen Seite) kommt die Zeichfolge 'none' kein einziges mal vor.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-08 00:07:48+00:00): Kto to jest "Kołłataj"? Masz na myśli "Hugona Kołłątaja"? Nie dość, że bez polskich znaków to jeszcze bez imienia...
SomeoneElse (2014-11-06 09:50:48+00:00): For the shops, I'd suggest "shop=charity" for the charity shop, and either "pet_grooming" or "dog_grooming" for the other one, as suggested by taginfo at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=grooming#values .

Also, it'd be really helpful if you used a descriptive changeset comment each time - "added two shops in Meden Vale" would be much more descriptive than "General Edit" :-)
SomeoneElse (2014-11-07 22:14:53+00:00): Please don't add "test" features to the main map.  If you want to test things, use the "dev" server instead.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-07 22:18:17+00:00): (reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26630372 )
trial (2022-09-04 19:56:34+00:00): Bonjour, oui je déterre une vielle modification : l'Aa, canalisée, ne semble pas s'appeler Aa Caanlisée sur toute la partie que vous avez indiqué.
https://lesfaiseursdebateaux.fr/aa-mots-croises-fleuve-cotier-nord-de-la-france/
user_1566574 (2023-02-24 20:59:30+00:00): Hello !
Tu as sûrement une meilleur connaissance du terrain que moi, tu sauras démêler cette relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4164556 et les bâtis alentours ? JOSM a du mal et moi davantage !

Merci :")
Erelen (2014-11-05 00:12:12+00:00): Пожалуйста, аккуратнее. Путь 286682372 снесён совершенно зазря.
Andronik Fa (2014-11-05 07:42:20+00:00): Виноват, извините. Там, просто, такая грязюка была и канавы... При том, что на другой стороне реки - обустроенная пеше-вело дорожка.
Erelen (2014-11-05 22:43:15+00:00): Я всё-таки склонен path там оставить. Когда дожди ещё не пошли - было вполне сносно ночью на велосипеде проехать - стало быть и пешком проблем бы не было.
trigpoint (2014-11-04 19:03:11+00:00): Is this really just called 'Health Centre'? I would expect a lttle more.
mckale (2014-11-05 11:49:19+00:00): dodane skały wspinaczkowe
SomeoneElse (2014-11-07 02:07:49+00:00): FWIW http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4164687 also matches where the "Interim route for walkers" was signed on the ground (where it is signed) when I've walked it.
dchiles (2014-11-04 20:48:51+00:00): I think there might be an error in this changeset. It looks like there are overlapping ways. one with the name and another with the oneway information.
dchiles (2014-11-05 05:48:43+00:00): I tried to fix it. You should check to see if it's correct
naoliv (2014-11-04 21:56:08+00:00): Braz, essas rodovias não são motorway.
Elas possuem cruzamentos, rotatórias e outras características que não definem uma motorway. Nem toda rodovia duplicada é motorway.
Braz Leme (2014-11-04 22:09:55+00:00): Então são o que? Já que estavam como via Expressa (o que não pode), sendo que não estamos usando aqui no BR esse tipo!

Certa vez coloquei, falaram que não se usas Expressa aqui no BR. Agora retirei, vc me diz que não são autoestradas. então precisamos definir o que são realmente! Quando coloquei Expressa em Araraquara e São Carlos, me falaram que estava errado.

Abraço
naoliv (2014-11-04 22:46:25+00:00): Usa! :-)
Tem, de certa forma, duas classificações: na área rural e na área urbana.
Na área rural (fora da cidade) as motorways são apenas as autoestradas (ou highways ou freeways). São as maiores rodovias, necessariamente tendo separação por canteiro central, sem nenhum tipo de cruzamento, rotatória, semáforo, etc. Se tiver algum tipo de cruzamento, trecho curto, rotatória, ou inexistência de outra característica, então vira trunk (ou primary, se não tiver separação por canteiro central e nem 2 ou mais faixas por sentido).
Já no caso das cidades existe uma classificação por preferência. Se a cidade possui apenas uma avenida principal, não há necessidade de utilizar trunk para classificá-la (já que tertiary supri a necessidade). Se há várias avenidas tertiary e uma avenida maior, unindo as tertiary, essa utiliza uma classificação maior (secondary).
Justamente por isso não é necessário (mas não proibido) utilizar trunk em uma cidade que não requer todos os níveis de hierarquia das highways. É o que está representado aqui http://goo.gl/p7bz52 (com mais informações em http://goo.gl/ioUq2M)
Outra coisa é que a rodovia deve manter continuidade ao cruzar uma cidade. Por exemplo, uma rodovia primary que cruza uma cidade pequena, continua primary (mesmo que todo o resto das ruas da cidade sejam apenas residential)
kreuzschnabel (2016-11-26 12:11:23+00:00): This was well meant but poorly done I’m afraid. Firstly, traffic islands are certainly no pedestrian areas. Secondly, turn lanes are never mapped as separate ways (but tagged into the existing ways by turn:lanes, I gave an example here). A road is mapped as separate ways only in case of physically separated carriageways. Anyway, another user gave a hint that there’s a roundabout now, so I removed all the excessive lane mapping and put the roundabout roughly in.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-22 21:49:51+00:00): Hi - some buildings here have been added as "building=y#" - I'm guessing that that should be building=yes?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311168535 is one example - the two to the south are too.
ndm (2015-11-24 00:29:15+00:00): Well spotted -- definitely not intended -- will modify asap.
abdeldjalil (2015-11-01 12:52:26+00:00): c'est "amenity=hospital" pas "landuse=hospital"
numide (2015-11-01 14:38:57+00:00): arrête de me suivre comme un chien, nyek
abdeldjalil (2015-11-01 15:07:29+00:00): Pourquoi tu dis ça ?? , Je demande les conseils pour cartographier les élément géographique bien , SVP n'insulter pas comme ça !!!!
numide (2015-11-01 15:50:12+00:00): tu donnes des ordres aux gens...
GeoffJones (2014-11-04 22:09:19+00:00): Track added from Garmin after walking it today
Yorvik Prestigitator (2014-11-07 17:44:34+00:00): Hi McRoyall, you need to connect footways to the other ways they meet or it will break any routing application
ullus (2014-11-05 13:40:07+00:00): Отлично! Давно пора было добавить подъезды.
Nunkee (2014-11-05 19:38:51+00:00): Но не main'ами же. [staircase]
BushmanK (2014-11-05 21:46:59+00:00): А где-то есть внятное объяснение того, к чему именно относится *=staircase? Этого значения не было даже в исходном предложении об изменении схемы entrance. Так что "понимай, как хочешь".
SomeoneElse (2014-11-06 20:04:19+00:00): What does "added/fixed names" mean?  The change to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95193730/history doesn't seem to be name-related; it's added a join to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311181728 (valid I'm sure, but not related to names at all).
beweta (2014-11-06 20:08:39+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse,

the most edits in this changeset are name-related. I don't mention every little edit.
Jose Riha (2014-12-16 20:48:56+00:00): jelsovu 3 som presunul juznejsie - nedavno som tu bol a na mieste housenumber 3 je cislo 5. takisto som pridal addr:conscriptionnumber a addr:streetnumber podla http://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov
Andronik Fa (2014-11-05 07:39:51+00:00): Линия 311140448 - больше не подходит под тэг "path", т.к. это обустроенная пеше-вело дорожка, а не "Тропа (возможно, стихийная)". Измените сам если согласны. В этом парке ведется строительство велодорожки с выходом на Воробьевскую набережную.
Andronik Fa (2014-11-05 07:44:04+00:00): Линия 311140446 от моста на север также уже не подходит по тэг "path", т.к. она тоже уже обустроенная пеше-вело дорожка. Измените сам если согласны.
Erelen (2014-11-05 22:36:42+00:00): Ух ты! Не очень давно там был, но теперь повод прокатиться там ещё разок.
Очень рад ошибиться и прошу прощения за свою ошибку. Сейчас всё переправлю обратно.
naoliv (2014-11-13 12:15:37+00:00): LucFreitas, você apagou alguns caminhos nesta sua edição que definem alguns limites administrativos. No caso você quebrou o limite de Vila Velha.
Já que você utiliza o JOSM, é bom validar os dados antes de enviá-los e verificar as mensagens de aviso.
naoliv (2014-11-13 13:17:21+00:00): LucFreitas, o resto da sua edição está realmente muito bom. Teria como você apenar verificar o traçado dessas duas relações e corrigi-los? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1850529 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1850534
LucFreitas (2014-11-13 15:37:29+00:00): Realmente, foi um descuido meu. Obrigado por avisar-me. Creio que agora está certo.
naoliv (2014-11-14 01:24:51+00:00): Ótimo. Obrigado!
russdeffner (2014-12-05 16:22:24+00:00): Hello, thanks for this contribution to OSM! However, it looks like you may have accidentally deleted South Cottonwood Court in your changeset; and maybe you were using poor imagery as many of your building outlines were not accurately reflecting the size and shape of the buildings, in my case I used the MapBox imagery to fix them up as it appears to be a fall/winter capture so the leaves are gone and it's easier to see the building edges.
mlwiles (2014-11-05 04:56:35+00:00): http://services.wakegov.com/realestate/AddressSearch.asp?stnum=&stname=millkirk&locidList=&spg=
berndw (2014-11-05 16:16:25+00:00): Ich habe mir erlaubt an dieser Filiale die Üffnungszeiten zu korrigieren, da ein Fehler im Format vorlag.
Die Ursache sind wahrscheinlich die Spaces hier den Semikolon
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-08 01:33:31+00:00): No i cóż? Wyrysowałeś budynki w gminie Wojaszówka, ale są wyrysowane do nieskalibrowanego podkładu. Ni to poprawiać, ni to usuwać....
esaulenka (2014-11-14 20:03:04+00:00): можно полюбопытствовать, чем помешали эти улицы, что их понадобилось перерисовывать (попутно сломав маршруты автобусов) ?
SomeoneElse (2014-11-06 20:19:56+00:00): Does adding "railway=museum" to every railway museum communicate something that perhaps "railway=museum" fails to?  If so, I'm missing what it is :-)
SomeoneElse (2014-11-06 20:21:01+00:00): (or, if I can get it the right way around) "... that museum=railway fails to"?
chillly (2014-11-06 20:56:53+00:00): This looks like a global mechanical edit. Was it discussed? 

I think it should be reverted and both worthless and undiscussed.
Geogast (2014-11-08 09:37:41+00:00): Nearly all the museums had been tagged with museum=railway by myself. This tag is not documentated nor proposed at all. But the "new" tag railway=museum is part of the openrailwaymap tagging scheme. So I ADDED this tag, I did not delete any tag, not even the ones I had added.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-08 10:20:34+00:00): Where was the "openrailwaymap" tagging scheme proposd and discussed?  Tags added for "openrailwaymap" will end up in everyone else's data too.  Also, I'm not convinced that "railway=museum" makes a lot of sense.  I'm currenly only a couple of miles from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59292078 and while it is most definitely a museum, if you went there to catch a train you'd be very disappointed.  Lots of people (myself included) extract railway data from OSM - this is another example of the "if you want X from OSM you have to extract X but then exclude X=Y because it's not really an X" - it makes the data more difficult to use for data consumers and doesn't add any more detail.
chillly (2014-11-08 10:39:41+00:00): These are not railway features they are museums. If I'm interested in green space features I extract landuse, leisure and sport features. I don't add greenspace=yes to all of those across the world to make my extract slightly easier. I will ask the data working group to revert this changeset.
Nakaner (2014-11-08 13:36:52+00:00): There are two topics regarding this changeset which can be discussed. 

Topic 1 is the "mechanical edit question". From formal point of view, this edit can/should be reverted. It is a mechanical edit because we can doubt that Geogast has visited all museums. Mechanical edits which are not just a simple correction of mistakes (e.g. wrong spelled tags, trailing whitespace) have to be discussed.

The second question is about tagging. I disagree with SomeoneElse. New tags do not have to be discussed at Tagging and pass the common proposal process. What about Simple 3D Buildings Tagging Scheme and other newer 3D and indoor tagging schemes? They have not passed proposal process but still are heavily in use. Like OpenRailwayMap scheme, they are discussed in a [special part of OSM Forum](http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=42), the tagging schemes were created on meetings. OpenRailwayMap tagging scheme works the same way. It has a [multi-lingual mailing list](http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/2014-October/thread.html) and most new tags have been invented on two meetings in [Cologne](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Mappingwochenende_2014_1) and [Bad Nauheim](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Aktiventreffen_2014_2).

I think that railway=museum is a right tag for [National Railway Museum in York](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:National_Railway_Museum). If you have a look at the [image of Great Hall](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NRM_Great_Hall_merge2.jpg), you find a couple of locomotives. railway=museum does not mean that you can find working steam locomotives.

chilly wrote:
> These are not railway features they are museums.

It's a railway museum. If it was not interesting for railway enthusiast, it would not have become part of OpenRailwayMap scheme or with a condition like "It should have working locomotives". The important parts of OpenRailwayMap community (people like me, rurseekatze, Geogast, bigbug21, rayquaza, …) are railway enthusiast.
emacsen (2014-11-08 13:38:42+00:00): Geogast, as per the mechanical edit policy: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy  has this edit been discussed with the community? If not, I'm afraid that it will be subject to reversion. Please let me know if there's a public discussion somewhere (a mailing list archive, forum post, etc.), or I'll be reverting on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group. Since I don't enjoy doing reversions, please let me know if there's a community discussion for this mechanical edit that I can point to?
Nakaner (2014-11-08 14:25:19+00:00): I have been asked by DWG member Frederik Ramm, who knows me from Karlsruhe pub meeting as railway tagging expert, about my opinion in this case. You can find the first part of my answer two comments above this comment.

This changeset is no pure "mechanical edit". It seems to be done by hand with JOSM multiselect feature (Ctrl + F, add a tag). As Geogast said, he himself has added museum=railway to almost all objects. Now he added railway=museum to these objects because it is, in contrast to museum=railway, well documented.

Examples:
1. "Tren Museo", Mendoza, Argentinia. He added museum=railway in August 2013. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1941488061/history
2. National Railway Museum, York, UK. He added museum=railway to the POI node whose tags were transferred to the POI way by SomeoneElse. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/760466047/history

This changeset only lacks one thing – a good changeset comment like "add railway=museum because it is better documented than museum=railway. I myself have added museum=railway to almost all objects I have edited in this changeset."

I hope that the the missing discussion before is not the only argument which DWG puts forth for a reversion. Does every error-correcting or self-correcting edit have to be discussed before doing it? Should I ask at talk every time before I correct 30 mispellings of "hihgway" over the world? We need a little bet bureaucracy but not too much.
emacsen (2014-11-08 14:47:33+00:00): Nakaner- on behalf of the DWG I am following up on a complaint about this changeset. As per my previous comment, a few things are obvious:

1. This is clearly a mechanical edit. Otherwise, the user would have had to go through and load up the entire world with their editor, looking for a specific feature. It's far more likely that they used eg Overpass to make this query and modify the objects.

2. Therefore, since this is a mechanical edit, we can look at the policy. The other examples you gave are all "obvious corrections", such as fixing Highway as a key to "highway". This is relatively harmless, though I would argue even this is something that should be discussed with the community if done en mass.

3. According to taglinfo there are 111 instances of railway=museum (which likely include these edits) and 113 instances of museum=railway, so I'd argue the tags are in about equal use.

Unilateral decisions to modify objects en mass to change their tagging is exactly the type of situation where the mechanical edit policy is in place to address.

So yes, the concern over this edit is the lack of community discussion around it, and w/o that discussion, it will be reverted. If there's community discussion around changing it, and there's general consensus in favor of it, then it will be allowed to go through in the future.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-08 15:59:27+00:00): For info I'm currently not seeing any mention of musem here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway

or here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Mappingwochenende_2014_1

or here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Aktiventreffen_2014_2

or via a google search of "museum site:http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/archives/openrailwaymap/".

http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=42
is the "3d" forum - there's nothing on the front page of that particularly relevant to railways or museums.
Nakaner (2014-11-08 17:37:44+00:00): SomeoneElse, look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Railway_museums
emacsen (2014-11-09 14:18:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in changeset 26664064.
look4book (2018-08-25 11:31:42+00:00): Bitte mal prüfen, ob der ADAC hier tatsächlich noch Strom anbietet. Nebenan bei A.T.U. Hausnummer 535 ist jedenfalls eine aktiv.
luschi (2015-08-28 21:57:22+00:00): what is a barrier=access_control? you added 7 on different places on the world, and only this 7 barriers from you existing on OSM
blackadder (2014-11-19 10:48:27+00:00): Have reverted this changeset as no local discussion. Will reveiw with the Mappa-Mercia folks and other local mappers to see if any changes are required to places within the Birmingham authority area.
Graham Asher (2014-11-19 11:01:00+00:00): That seems an odd thing to do. It's perfectly clear from the tagging guidelines that 'village' and 'hamlet' should not be used for subdivisions of an urban area; 'local discussion' won't change that, and if inconsistencies are introduced because of local pressure that reduces the value of the map data as a whole.
blackadder (2014-11-19 12:18:03+00:00): Not at all. The wiki is not authoratative. By reverting I'm simply giving those, including myself, who live in Birmingham the chance to review whether any changes are appropriate. The majority of these place names were added years ago before there had been discussions about suburbs. Also suburbs have had a long history of disagreement within OSM. I've opened up a line of discussion on the west-mids list.
Graham Asher (2014-11-19 12:32:59+00:00): That's good. I'm glad the matter is now up for discussion, because it is a serious problem. My personal involvement arose from attempts at geocoding, where I very much needed to distinguish detached places from parts of conurbations. It would be marvellous if every suburb, city, town, and so on was mapped as a polygon, and the polygons nested properly and didn't intersect, but I know that will never happen.
blackadder (2014-11-19 15:36:42+00:00): ha, alas life is never that simple. In reality many places keep their own identity and never consider they are a suburb. In some cases if you were to infer to a local that a place was a suburb of another you would probably get lynched. The meaning of "place" has much wider connotations than simply the means of naming a geographical area.
blackadder (2014-12-15 09:53:24+00:00): Just a quick update. We (some west mids mappers) discussed this at our social at the beginning of the month. We are looking over all the place names in Birmingham to check for status and inconsistencies and expect to make some changes in the next month or so.
eggie (2021-01-22 08:01:42+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen... Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
M!dgard (2018-01-10 17:12:42+00:00): Wat bedoel je precies met een breedte van -1 meter?
MaartenFerny (2018-01-10 17:35:35+00:00): Ik het gewijzigd naar 1m.
Nakaner (2014-11-05 18:49:43+00:00): Die Tastatur meines Android-Smartphones war abgestürzt und ich habe bis auf ein Komma den gesamten Kommentar des letzten Änderungssatzes aus dem Eingabefeld gelöscht. Das Komma habe ich drin gelassen, damit der Kommentar nicht leer ist.

Es gilt derselbe Kommentar wie für Änderungssatz 26568995
trigpoint (2014-11-05 13:01:03+00:00): This change looks wrong.
A track has been added intersecting with Rectory Road.
The track has been tagged access=no, despite it connecting to a bridleway.
mentor (2014-11-11 00:10:27+00:00): Objects updated in c26700918
eggie (2022-02-23 10:48:28+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen bij deze .... Opnieuw welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2014-11-27 22:25:49+00:00): I think that something's gone a bit wrong here - the roundabout http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311248321 doesn't have any highway tag on it?
Hjart (2014-11-05 20:17:05+00:00): Dette stykke vej er ikke forbundet med andre veje (deler ikke noder med dem). Er det meningen?
jnjlc (2014-11-05 20:19:44+00:00): Rettet