piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DavidKewley (2017-01-08 05:40:00+00:00): Hi Warfare, thanks for contributing to OSM! You drew a footpath in the Frank Hogan Tot Lot off Osage and 167th, but I see no path in the Bing imagery. Please reply to let us know what's really on the ground there. If we don't hear from you, it'll probably get deleted at some point on the assumption that it's not really there. Thanks, David
GerdP (2017-08-22 14:39:30+00:00): Hi!
Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458271428#map=19/9.43645/-1.06672
highway=Tolon should probably be name=Tolon?
vehicle=no in combination with bicycle=designated makes no sense. Maybe motor_vehicle=no was meant?
Enock4seth (2017-08-23 06:16:40+00:00): Thanks GerdP.
PT-53 (2017-01-13 09:45:38+00:00): Hallo t2425b,
im OSM-Inspector wird nach Deiner Bearbeitung hier eine Fehlermeldung ways_without_tags angezeigt:  http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.63620&lat=48.13099&zoom=11&opacity=0.34
  Kümmerst Du Dich darum ?
Grüße aus Oberschwaben
PT-53 (2017-01-13 09:48:44+00:00): Korrekter Link:  http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.97888&lat=48.39545&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
rainerU (2017-01-15 06:30:36+00:00): Der betroffene Way hat ein Attribut barrier=retaining_wall  

http://www.openstreetmap.orgwww.openstreetmap.org/way/463981131#map=19/48.39540/9.97875

Das scheint ein "false positive" im OSM Insepctor zu sein.
PT-53 (2017-01-15 09:12:16+00:00): Hallo rainerU,
das war kein false positive! Der fehlende Tag wurde zwischenzeitlich ergänzt, wie Du in der History sehen kannst.
Grüße
manoharuss (2017-01-18 06:59:39+00:00): Hi Glass Cup,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. This way you added here is crossing with itself in several places, crossing with a building. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463978015

It would be if you can correct these and in general also keep the ways into smaller segments which would be easier for corrections.

Best,

Manohar
user_1470980 (2017-01-10 06:04:08+00:00): hallo csx,
ich kann mir ein Detail https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463984735#map=19/47.51562/12.31392 das Du in die Loferer Straße eingebaut hast nicht erklären.
user_5359 (2017-01-07 19:12:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t paint the footway over existing highways! Please read the definition of highway type  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway)
aceman444 (2021-01-07 09:42:36+00:00): Zdravim, prosim davajte pozor na tu hodnotu 'permissive', znamena to, ze vsetci maju vstup povoleny kym si to vlastnik nerozmysli. Ak pisete, ze je tam "obmedzeny vstup" (zrejme len vlastnik ci obmedzeny okruh ludi/vozidiel), ma to byt hodnota 'private'. A ked ste uz zadali access=*, potom su znacky motorcar a vehicle nadbytocne. Ak je tam brana do dvora, potom je access OK, vstup maju zakazany aj chodci, ale ak tam nie je, potom tam teoreticky mozu ist, ak tam nie je nejaka znacka ci napis "sukromny pozemok". Vtedy davajte obmedzenie len podla znacky, napr. casto je tam len zakaz vjazdu, teda vehicle=private. Skuste to v Ruzomberku poopravovat. Dakujem
aceman444 (2021-01-08 11:55:01+00:00): Chcel som povedat, ked ma access aj vehicle ci motorcar rovnaku hodnotu (ako tu 'permissive", tak su zbytocne. Ked maju roznu tak OK.
Napr. na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258898464 je len motorcar nadbytocne. Vyzera OK, ze vozidla maju zakaz (len pre vlastnikov), ale pride mi cudne, ze vsetci ostatni (napr. chodci) tam maju len "permissive", cize su tolerovani, kym to vlastnik neodvola. To mi takto v meste pride zvlastne. Je tam nejaka moznost, ze obmedzi chodcov? Je tam brana, ktoru moze lahko zamknut?
Mirecnet (2021-01-11 22:25:01+00:00): To je 4 roky stare. Porobili tam vtedy obmedzene poarkovanie a vsade spravili zakaz. Treba to opravit. Je tam len obmedzeny rezidencny vstup pre domace auta.
aceman444 (2021-01-17 21:31:53+00:00): No "permissive" neznamena nejake zasadne obmedzenie, takze to asi ani v tej dobe nebolo spravne.
Co je to teda "rezidencny vstup" ? Len obyvatelia? (Potom mozno "=private"). A co navstevy? Potom mozno "=destination". A zrejme len pre "vehicle" a nie "access" (aj pre chodcov). Skuste to teda aktualizovat. Dakujem.
Mirecnet (2021-01-18 21:09:01+00:00): OPRAVENE
Dakujem za upozornenie
utack (2017-01-06 02:19:40+00:00): Hallo icchan3, willkommen bei OSM  
Ein kleiner Hinweis:  
Adressdaten sind auf OpenStreetMap ganz normale Tags. Diese können auf einzelnen Knoten (Punkten), ebenso wie auf Wegen (hier die Häuser) eingetragen werden.  
Die beiden Hausnummern von Dir waren korrekt eingetragen, aber in diesem Fall bereits auf den Gebäuden vorhanden.
user_5359 (2017-01-07 18:55:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the footpath with the existing highways.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 21:40:59+00:00): removido
user_5359 (2017-01-07 18:20:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your "test entry".
user_5359 (2017-01-07 18:19:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the housenumer isn’t the name of a building!
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-16 18:22:46+00:00): Hi Dannyfm, welcome to OSM. Could you please explain your map edits? Seems like some fictive data.
user_5359 (2017-01-07 18:16:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the footpath with the existing highways.
user_5359 (2017-01-07 18:04:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! At frist: You forgot to add any information on your way! At second: Please don’t paint any way over an other existing way.

If you need help: You are welcome!
user_5359 (2017-01-07 17:57:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read defintion of pedestrian! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
user_5359 (2017-01-07 07:11:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If have delete your overlapping ways. You can add the tag sidewalk on the existing way (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sidepath_tagging_scheme) or you paint  a separate way and add highway=footway.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:30:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
escada (2017-03-09 11:21:26+00:00): Please do not add streets based on out-dated aerial imagery and some QA-tools.

I have visited the place and there is no bridge.
Unless you have super powers, I fail to see the bridge in https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2016/2016-12-04-Boekhoute/i-vfj26fH
mavl (2017-01-12 17:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
FTA (2017-01-06 04:31:57+00:00): in Hobbs, New Mexico*
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:51:29+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:29:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
TheSwavu (2017-01-13 05:29:55+00:00): Do you have a source for the name "Murwillumbah Golf Course Footpath"?
manoharuss (2017-01-06 05:28:10+00:00): Hi Cynthi Cepada,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. The footway you added was crossing the service road here. I have fixed this. Please make sure that the highways you add do not cross with the existing map data.

Best,

Manohar
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:15:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:22:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:09:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:25:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:25:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:50:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
majkaz (2017-01-26 15:21:27+00:00): Thank you for adding to the map. 
However, you are flooding the map with duplicates - some of your own.
Please check carefully if something is already mapped or not. As a tip - almost every school and dispensary is already mapped, no need to add.

I will be reverting the duplicates mapped here, but please, do not add it again.
majkaz (2017-01-26 15:38:33+00:00): Just checked in detail first 30 POIs added to the map. Everything is a duplicate, found perhaps one edit worth joining with existing point.
Please, either clean it by yourself or I'll revert the whole changeset.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:25:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:26:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:14:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:26:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:27:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:27:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:27:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:28:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 10:37:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect your highways withe the other highways!
user_5359 (2017-01-06 10:19:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333919886 ? Is this the same business or different in the same building?

If you need help: You are welcome!
Peter Dobratz (2017-01-18 00:57:57+00:00): I've walked by here and can confirm that the node and area refer to the same thing.  I've combined the two objects and changed the tagging from shop=photo to craft=photographer as that seems to better fit what this business does.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 10:09:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:25:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:30:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:31:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
GerdP (2017-08-31 06:39:45+00:00): Hi!
I know it's a bit late ;-)
Please review unusual tagging
highway=closed:tertiary
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464037325 and parallel way.
If this is still closed
I think disused:highway=service is better,
see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
GerdP (2017-08-31 06:42:26+00:00): ah, sorry, copy+paste error :-(
I meant disused:highway=tertiary
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:28:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:28:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:28:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 10:00:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-06 19:28:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-06 19:47:43+00:00): @user_5359 Thanks for "fighting the good fight" against invalid Pokemon Go additions like this one - if you have a problem with users continuing with edits like this, please let us know!
Best Regards,
Andy from the DWG.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:59:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t forget to connect the highways.
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:34:41+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:31:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the park area.
nammala (2017-01-06 07:11:01+00:00): Hi adam2099,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The footway you added seems proper but make sure that the ways get connected and ended properly. Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:28:28+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:28:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:22:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
AsgerFrank (2017-01-07 13:13:18+00:00): Husnummer-punktet (adressepunktet) ændrer man normalt ikke ved, i stedet kan man lave et punkt med butikken lige ved siden af. Jeg har derfor flyttet bar-data over i et selvstændigt punkt i stedet.
AsgerFrank (2017-01-06 18:25:06+00:00): Man sætter gerne stoppestedet ved siden af vejen, så kan man også se hvilken vej bussen kører. 
Evt. kan man tilføje fx rutenummer under Netværk, navn på stoppestedet fra køreplaner, osv.
Så det har jeg lige gjort.
Du kan evt. rette den efter mig ved at tilføje om der er bænk, for det kan jeg ikke huske.
Hjart (2017-01-06 09:41:23+00:00): Pizza House var i forvejen i vores database, selvom man ikke kan se det for "Stick Out".
Er der stadig en iscafe her og præcist hvor er i så fald Pizza House?
Hjart (2017-01-06 09:31:57+00:00): Jeg sletter lige det her, da det ikke er andet end meningsløse kruseduller
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:22:15+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Hjart (2017-01-06 09:29:44+00:00): Jeg har rullet det meste af denne ændring tilbage. Dels var Promenaden markeret i forvejen (se bygning) og dels er det generelt smartere at flytte noder/punkter end at slette og oprette nye (Shell/7-Eleven)
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:18:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check your web address!
PierZen (2017-03-31 14:48:04+00:00): Relation : 6852463 a enlever - Intersection - deux sens uniques et aucun panneau d'interdiction u-turn
mihaii_telenav (2017-04-04 07:19:17+00:00): Hi PierZen,
Thanks for your message. From what I understand (my French is really bad) you're saying that relation #6852463 should be deleted, right? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I have added that turn restriction based on Montreal local data with turn restrictions. In that file, at that intersection there is a only_straight_on sign and, from what I understand, this is the only maneuver allowed there. So, based on this, the u_turn is prohibited.

Thanks,
Mihai
PierZen (2017-04-04 13:05:35+00:00): highway 464050186 is both direction. The two other ways at the intersection are oneway. Coming from highway 464050186, there are simply two oneway signs at the intersection. The No u-turn is your interpretation.
mihaii_telenav (2017-04-05 07:16:38+00:00): Thanks for your input! In my opinion if there's a sign saying that you can only go straight at an intersection, all other maneuvers are prohibited. That was my logic behind the edit. Please let me know if you consider that I should remove that restriction.

Thanks,
Mihai
saintam1 (2017-01-06 21:11:02+00:00): Привет,

Забелязах, че използвате Bing за очертаване на контурите на сградите. Но според GPS следи изображенията на Bing са с няколко метра неточни.

Съветвам Ви да иползвате изображенията на Mapbox (натистнете "b" в прозореца за редактиране). Тези изображения са и по-нови.
Asensancho (2017-01-13 21:09:17+00:00): Благодаря, не знаех, съжалявам. Значи всичко което съм направил е изместено?
saintam1 (2017-01-19 09:38:38+00:00): Здравейте,

Да, всичко е изместено с по няколко метра. Препоръчително е да използвате много по-новия MapBox.

Леко и приятно картографиране!
TheSwavu (2017-01-31 22:12:48+00:00): Hi,

Another one that needs the names split:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29132396
mavl (2017-01-12 17:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:09:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
habi (2018-11-14 09:23:33+00:00): In my opinion all the buildings should be tagged as 'building=yes' instead of 'landuse=residential'. I changed most of them.
mavl (2017-10-15 16:20:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52957252 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44919762].
muzirian (2017-03-31 16:17:09+00:00): Nice work in the area.But its better not to share same way for road and land use polygon.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-06 09:15:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between building:levels=0 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels) and level=0 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level)
mavl (2017-10-15 16:20:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52957252 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44919762].