piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
naoliv (2014-11-13 11:45:46+00:00): You have duplicated some nodes (and then some boundaries were left unclosed) in this changeset. It's good to validate the data with JOSM before uploading it.
dannykath_labuildings (2016-04-29 19:19:53+00:00): thanks for yoru comment Naoliv, I'll be careful
DannyAiquipa (2016-04-29 19:20:41+00:00): thanks for your comment Naoliv.
 I'll be more careful
Allison P (2024-05-22 20:13:19+00:00): You did not properly expand the street suffixes. See, for example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311702540
emacsen (2014-11-09 12:14:33+00:00): What are the sources of these trails? Also, what's with this odd changeset comment tag "BBOX....." - this seems like an automated edit of some sort...
horst_w (2014-11-09 15:03:46+00:00): The sourcesof all these trails (Austria and Hawaii)  are surveys.
No idea about the BBOX thing!?!
emacsen (2014-11-09 15:08:34+00:00): When you say surveys, do you mean your own surveying? If so, can you indicate that on a "source" tag on the changeset please?

As for the weird comment- it looks like you're using Merkaartor- which is basically an abandoned project- I suspect that's the issue.
horst_w (2014-11-09 15:35:29+00:00): Yes my own survey. I did the Kuli'ou'ou Ridge Trail at Oct, 8. (BTW: http://www.willingshofer.at.hm/usa14/seiten/20141008.htm)
source=survey is still set since first upload!
rickmastfan67 (2014-11-17 03:12:30+00:00): horst_w, he's referring to adding a 'source' tag on the changeset itself.  Take a look at my changesets as an example of this type of 'source' tag.
DaCor (2014-11-09 00:47:17+00:00): Hi there, I am assuming you are one of the LIT folks that started editing today. I made a few modifications to your edits, I hope you dont mind. I added the pitch outlines and some of the GAA buildings etc and a road 

Feel free to shout if you need any assistance

Thanks, 
DaCor (Dave from Galway)
GerdP (2015-10-13 13:48:38+00:00): please review:
way 28820834 has the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;tertiary
Supaplex (2014-11-09 19:09:09+00:00): 要不要雙軌化，以及將紅橘線的聯絡軌畫上去?
luschi (2015-02-17 20:11:35+00:00): An dieser Kreuzung hast du so einige Fehler hinterlassen. 1.Von der Friedrichstraße in richtung Uhlandstraße sollte man besser turn_lanes verwenden anstelle der eingezeichneten Straßen. 2.L370 als access=no verbietet alles, und wenn das wirklich nur eine Busspur ist solltest du highway=service verwenden. 3.Wenn hier alles umgebaut wird sollte die Fläche als construction gemappt werden und die Straßen die temporär anders laufen darüber legen. 4. Karlstraße im Süden: highway=construction sagt schon von sich aus access=no. Da muss man nicht alle Fahrzeuge usw. extra auflisten. 5.highway_1=construction??? den tag gibt es nicht. Der geistert hier auch irgendwo noch rum.
StijnRR (2015-02-21 21:05:54+00:00): With this changeset you destroyed a lot of hiking routes. Please be more careful.
The RedBurn (2015-02-22 20:12:17+00:00): I'm really sorry about that, I didn't notice there were relations on those ways.
Were you able to fix them?
StijnRR (2015-02-23 19:22:20+00:00): Yes, it's already OK.
LLlypuk82 (2014-11-14 13:14:33+00:00): Здравствуйте. На каком основании вы делаете не существующую и даже не строящуюся дорогу действующей? Проспект Фрунзе только в планах города, но никак не дорога, по которой можно ехать.
Большая просьба прекратить заниматься самодеятельностью (и со статусами дорог - тоже).
*Martin* (2014-11-12 20:28:53+00:00): Ahoj Gazember

Dakujem ze vylepsujes mapu. Chcem ta len poprosit aby si zadaval aj popisy zmien (changesetov) nech je z nich zbezne jasne co je ich obsahom. Dakujem :-)
LarsBG (2016-11-04 19:26:59+00:00): Hvad er det sket her med vejnavn. Mon at addr:street = 2,8571429 er korrekt ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1406550744/history
Hjart (2016-11-04 19:37:21+00:00): Det ser godt nok mystisk ud. Jeg har ingen anelse hvordan det kan være sket. Korrekt ser det i hvertfald ikke ud til at være.
LarsBG (2016-11-04 20:03:23+00:00): Tak Det ser mere rigtigt ud.
DaCor (2014-11-08 23:02:13+00:00): Hi Mark, I am assuming you are one of the LIT students. Please be aware that the data in OpenStreetMap is live data used worldwide on many maps across many websites and applications. Please do not add fictitious features to the map, even in the middle of the ocean. If you have any questions, please let me know. 

DaCor (Dave from Galway)
GerdP (2015-11-23 08:09:28+00:00): Hi there!
I've noticed that you have added the highway=footway attribute to some 
addr:interpolation ways. 
I think this wasn't a good idea. These
ways do not describe the footway.
They are a work around for areas where the individual house numbers were not yet mapped. 
See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Using_interpolation
DaCor (2014-11-09 00:20:17+00:00): Hi Jalice, I hope you dont mind but I added additional features based on your edits. 

By the way, I assume you are one of the people on the LIT course. If you need any assistance feel free to shout

Thanks, 
DaCor (Dave from Galway)
Jalice (2014-11-11 18:37:07+00:00): Hi DaCor
No Problem thanks for the pointers. 
Yeah we are the class in LIT. Still early days but very interesting stuff so far. 
We watched a few of your videos on townland mapping last week. 
Any interest in coming to Thurles and giving us a few pointers first hand?
Regards
Jalice (James a Kerryman exiled in Tipp)
DaCor (2014-11-11 21:45:38+00:00): I've no problem at all coming down, I'll give the lecturer a shout as its up to him
Warin61 (2018-04-18 21:43:18+00:00): Hi,
This area appears to have better mapping on the LPI Base Map - more detail on twists and turns. 
Do you mind if I change your entries to comply with the LPI data?
dhx1 (2018-04-19 01:55:39+00:00): If I recall correctly, the tracks I added in this changeset were traced from satellite imagery. So you are right that some twists and turns were probably hidden under trees in the satellite data. Feel free to change that to LPI data. I would suggest however checking the changes against Digital Globe premium imagery too, just for extra validation that the LPI data is accurate.
dhx1 (2018-04-19 01:59:17+00:00): I just compared, and the current cliff lines in OpenStreetMap are very poor compared to the LPI Base Map. I'd say all the cliffs could be changed automatically--just delete the existing ones and replace with accurate LPI cliffs.
Warin61 (2018-04-19 02:18:45+00:00): The LPI Imagery is at least as good as the Digital Globe Imagery .. and it does not go white if you over zoom. 
And yes the LPI Base Map has difference to the LPI Imagery .. so it is worth keeping an eye on the imagery where you can see what is being mapped. So I would tend to use the LPI Imagery here. 

I have added unmapped cliff lines from the LPI base map already .. the plots from Bing are fair .. but lacks the topo data to confirm that a rock is the start of a cliff or just a rock or the start of a ramp. 

JOSM has the ability to 'replace' an old way with new data and keep the way history, this is a better method of 'updating'. I have used it from time to time and most of the time it works.
StefanB (2014-11-10 09:47:00+00:00): Could you guys please not delete names in other languages (name:* tags), while you fight over the official names? Thanks!
szali (2014-11-11 21:14:30+00:00): Szia! Ha az út aszfaltozott, akkor surface=asphalt kell a surface=unpaved helyett. Ha pedig motor_vehicle=no, akkor motorcar=no nem kell, mert a gépjármű tiltása egyben tiltja a személygépkocsit is. (Egyébként motor_vehicle=private lenne a helyes, mert gondolom az engedéllyel rendelkezők behajthatnak.)
Okorzec (2014-11-08 16:10:42+00:00): Cześć. Jestem początkujący i dopiero uczę się edycji i dobrej praktyki. Mam nadzieję, że nie wystartowałem od czegoś zbyt jeszcze dla mnie skomplikowanego. Zacząłem ten szlak rysować samemu od zera jako inna relację, gdyż nie znalazłem od razu tego tego szlaku w edytorze...Usunąłem wszystko krok po kroku i dodałem potem zmiany już tutaj, we właściwej relacji. Posliłkowałem się śladami .gpx własnymi oraz z http://mapa-turystyczna.pl/route/4w7, skanami topo z geoportalu, Cykloatlasem i mapą Compass'u. Chciałbym aby szlak był widoczny również na http://www.hikebikemap.org/, tak jak np. pobliska Relacja: Bielawa - Przełęcz pod Puchaczem (1716770)  Z tej przykładowej relacji skopiowałem brakujące tagi, ucząc się ich powoli. Docelowo chciałbym też stworzyć z tej relacji zielonego szlaku dwie - "Romanów-Gorzanów-Bystrzyca Kłodzka"  i "Międzynarodowy Szlak I22" (fragmenty przy Torfowisku pod Zieleńcem) ale jeszcze nie wiem jak to zrobić. Z góry bardzo dziękuję za wszystkie uwagi i poprawki i przepraszam, jeśli wjechałem z buciorami.
Okorzec (2014-11-10 10:13:22+00:00): ok, już wiem, że Geoportalu, Cykloatlasu i Compassu nie mogę używać...
eggie (2019-02-05 17:57:30+00:00): Lange tijd geleden actief maar nooit een welkomstmail met nuttige tips en links  ontvangen denk ik. Wellicht kun je er wat mee. 
Bij deze alsnog... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Gr eggie
DaCor (2014-11-08 23:56:21+00:00): Hi Mark, I edited the features you added. The playground, I marked out the full area of it, and the estate you edited, I added walls, split buildings, added grassy areas, tidied roads etc. I removed the number of the house you added as it was a detached house and I couldn't be sure which part should be numbered. Feel free to add the number back again or even add the numbers for all of the houses in that estate. 

It looks like you are using the iD editor, so using that editor, when you click on the building, you should see the option to add the housenumber there. 

I've also added the addr:street tag to all the buildings in that estate with the name of the estate you added to the roads, hope this is all one estate, let me know if its not, or feel free to correct it yourself
DaCor (2014-11-08 23:18:06+00:00): Information like the name of this cemetery is exactly the kind of information needed. I've updated the area based on the info you provided, take a look at it now
mweper (2014-11-08 14:55:00+00:00): ¿Si ese lugar se inunda con frecuencia, no se podría dejar como natural=water y agregarle que es intermitente? Digo, porque hasta que no se actualicen las imágenes aéreas, presta a la confusión y seguro lo agrega otro mas adelante.
Humitos (2014-11-08 15:16:07+00:00): Entiendo.

No estoy seguro cuál es la forma correcta de marcarlo, pero estoy seguro que no se debería mostrar como un lago ya que en realidad es una especie de "cancha de fútbol". No recuerdo exactamente si están puestos los arcos ahora o los han quitado. Pero bueno, al menos "solía" ser una cancha de Fútbol.
Bierphysik (2022-03-25 09:01:36+00:00): Hallo. Die Stromtrasse Richtung Konrad-Adeneuer-Straße in Langen; hast Du die nur anhand der Bing Maps gemappt? Ich sehe da nämlich auf den aktuellen Bing maps nichts und da stehen auch zumindest am nördlichen Ende keine Poles.
Bierphysik (2022-03-25 09:02:16+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3024990
spacer1971 (2022-03-25 13:43:00+00:00): Ja, die war damals bei Bing zu sehen, ist wohl inzwischen abgebaut. Jetzt komplett weg bei Bing. Ich habe sie entfernt (auf removed: gesetzt).
Self-Perfection (2014-11-18 11:27:35+00:00): Какой смысл здесь в замене highway=service на highway=pedestrian ?

Судя по снимку, автомобили этими проездами пользуются. Выглядит как типичный highway=service.

Подробнее см. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C - пункт "жилая зона" и http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
emacsen (2014-11-09 12:11:41+00:00): Great catch!
jgpacker (2014-11-08 15:34:03+00:00): this error is related to this commit: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/commit/977949292df96c42624ef2bf93e42391ae2cc8dc
naoliv (2014-11-08 19:12:46+00:00): Elton, essa via que você removeu era uma rua proposta, ainda em planejamento.
Tem certeza que não existe nenhuma rua planejada neste trecho?
Hjart (2014-11-23 22:58:55+00:00): Det ser ud til at du næsten præcist samtidig med LarsBG har tegnet en sti ud til Store Råbjerg. En af jer må altså trække sig :)
ablansinger (2014-11-24 17:55:22+00:00): Ja det er da pudsigt, da det ikke er det samme vi har tegnet må jeg hellere lige konferere med LarsBG før jeg gør noget.
ablansinger (2014-11-24 21:01:04+00:00): Er efter aftale med LarsBG kommet frem til at vi sletter pathen.
Hjart (2014-11-25 11:17:03+00:00): Udmærket :)
Polyglot (2014-11-09 07:09:55+00:00): Waarom verplaatste jij deze bushalte 820m?
luisindepels (2014-11-09 07:16:41+00:00): oei lap tis aan passing die ik niet wou doen...zal perron geluk zijn...
luisindepels (2014-11-09 07:22:45+00:00): heb weer op orgineel plaats gezet! zal door dat langs de grens aan klikken was en ik per ongeluk deze bewerking heb gedaan
Polyglot (2014-11-09 10:00:00+00:00): Hallo, bedankt om ze terug te zetten. Met iD heb je dat soort dingen nogal gemakkelijk aan de hand, vrees ik. Als je wilt, wil ik wel eens een hangout doen om je in te wijden in JOSM. Er gaat binnenkort ook een mapping party door in Antwerpen. Zit jij  op de talk-be mailing list?
luisindepels (2014-11-09 14:33:58+00:00): oh antwerpen is beetje ver...ik deed enkel maar mijn wijk hier de barakken en beetje in menen. heb geen ambitie om veel verder in te doen.
Polarbear (2015-11-07 16:23:40+00:00): Hi VictorIE, do you have further details about this club, and who it operates? Would you know if it targets children, juveniles, or both? Is there a website for the club?
VictorIE (2015-11-07 19:38:25+00:00): I know nothing of it. I only got the details from passing by on the bus. you might try http://www.cdysb.ie/ - they might know something. Google doesn't throw up much, but it seems to have been around for a long time.

Alternatively, I presume the city council housing department is their landlord.
d1g (2014-11-08 18:49:20+00:00): indoor=yes у точки на въезде - непонятный тег, что на самом деле хотелось отметить?
TA777 (2014-11-08 17:19:04+00:00): Sorry, I forgot to comment that I edited my sources. Instead of pasting a long link to my traces, I've replaced it with "GPS tracks".
BCNorwich (2014-11-17 08:57:35+00:00): Are there really two fences (on top of each other) between the gardens, and do the fences (both of them) really go through the middle of joined houses.
Takuto (2014-12-09 09:57:36+00:00): Привет. Новостройка - дом с номером 50 вдоль Димитрова - по какой он улице?
(заодно опробую комментирование чейнджсетов ;) )
Noen (2014-11-09 21:19:34+00:00): Denne veistubben er merkelig nok en del av RV 150, og burde da tages som trunk?
Turleder'n (2014-11-09 23:09:26+00:00): Hmmm, jeg går ut i fra funksjonen jeg ser, og da er de ikke trunk; det er nesten ikke trafikk der og eneste funksjon er tilgang til Grefsen stasjon. Veistubben passer ikke helt til definisjonen "high performance roads" ... Veistubben er helt adskilt fra resten av Ring3/Storoveien (ulik høyde). Ser at norgeskart har den i rød farge, dvs. administrativt sett har du rett. 
Spørsmålet er om man tagger den virkelige funksjonen eller det en byråkrat har bestemt ...
jeg ble forvirret å se den som trunk ut fra funksjon og lokale forhold.
edward17 (2014-11-08 20:30:31+00:00): Странно, я ввёл описание пакета правок "Исправления, дополнения", но он ушёл на сервер с описанием предыдущего пакета правок
agranizo (2014-11-08 21:02:27+00:00): Hola, 

para que la escuela se vea en el mapa es mejor señalarla como amenity=school
BCNorwich (2014-11-12 07:36:28+00:00): I removed the self intersection from the residential, from the Bing image it looks like a great amount of this area in not residential, IMHO.
PT-53 (2018-01-28 19:42:57+00:00): Hallo oli-f,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz am Pflegezentrum / Zentrum für Medizin, Pflege + Soziales (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242413100#map=19/48.23337/9.64397) date_end=2014 eingetragen. Wurde das Pflegezentrum geschlossen ?
Gibt es dort auch eine Arztpraxis ? Dort wurde heute dieser Node überarbeitet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4709814687#map=19/48.23329/9.64421
.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße Peter
SK53 (2014-11-09 00:34:17+00:00): A bar called Londra is found at this address, not at anything visibly called El Chaperio
Peter Bremer (2018-09-24 17:37:58+00:00): Hei Steinar! A sidewalk ("pavement") is not a bicycle way. Just the fact that cyclists are allowed to cycle somewhere, does not make it a cycleway. You can add bicycle=yes or even bicycle=designated on sidewalks if you want, but the correct tagging for a sidewalk is highway=footway + footway=sidewalk.
steinarh (2018-10-01 04:55:04+00:00): It would help a lot if you indicated which way you are talking about.

The changeset you are commenting on is mainly about updating along the signposted cycle routes in Trondheim. It is also 4 years old, and stuff has changed. It's a large changeset from several days of GPX tracks.

Also while I always advocated for not highway=cycleway on general sidewalks, if it's signposted as a cycleway, it is a cycleway even if it otherwise looks like a sidewalk.

Note that 4 years ago, footway=sidewalk was not yet widely used, and we were still discussing the *=designated tag.
steinarh (2018-10-01 05:09:58+00:00): Comparing to your changeset from the same day, I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311837949 which matches your decription.  This used to have a painted cycleway on the sidewalk, before the cyclelanes in the road was built. And they are now going to revert this, remove the cyclelanes from the road, and back onto a new segregated cycleway on the "sidewalk".   https://miljopakken.no/prosjekter/falkenborgvegen
user_2452718 (2014-11-08 23:18:52+00:00): Kann man nicht links abbiegen. Heute bei Navigation mit Scott gemerkt
maraf24 (2015-06-21 21:34:32+00:00): Removed.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-12 10:39:19+00:00): This appears to be a mechanical edit - was it discussed anywhere?

Even if a change makes sense (which I don't know here because there has been no discussion), it's important that data consumers know that data has changed so that they know what to expect.

Also, what was the logic for changing the order of one tag (polling_station:ref) but not other related ones (polling_station:source)?
SomeoneElse (2014-11-08 23:56:50+00:00): Unless you visited all of these places individually, this looks very much like a mechanical edit:

http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy

Was it discussed anywhere beforehand, so that people who may have been rendering "tourism=basic_hut" on their maps don't get a nasty shock when the look at their maps and don't see any?
naoliv (2014-11-09 00:46:24+00:00): animulab, você criou 3 linhas sem nenhuma informação. Por exemplo: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311844777

E o que seria exatamente esta outra linha, também sem nenhum tipo de informação? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311844486
lezurdis (2014-11-09 19:38:38+00:00): No nó :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3175837340/history

Indicaste como website o endereço de um serviço da Google, o Google Street View tal como o Google Maps ou as imagens aéreas  da Google não são fontes de dados autorizadas dado que são fontes com copyright.

Não podes e não deves usar o Google Street View para sacar informações. Se tens conhecimento do local então tudo bem, es capaz de colocar a informação sem precisares de nenhum serviço externo.
ToeBee (2014-11-11 15:07:30+00:00): Your edits have recently come up in discussion on the talk-us mailing list. One thing that would help in discussing them is including a useful changeset comment that indicates why you are making the change and/or the source of the information. Please consider doing so in the future. 

Thanks.
DD1GJ (2015-09-24 21:49:58+00:00): Don't delete existing things by armchair mapping with an antiquated aerial photo.
Humza Photostudio (2017-12-19 11:18:28+00:00): Sir This City Name is Mouza Akbar
Humza Photostudio (2017-12-19 11:19:18+00:00): Sir this city not a two name only 1 name (Mouza Akbar)
Hjart (2014-11-17 21:07:36+00:00): Jeg sætter stor pris på dit arbejde med kommunegrænserne. Mange tak!
b-holdet (2014-11-18 05:19:18+00:00): Tak for opmærksomheden.
Lige nu døjer jeg med noget musearm, så de jyske kommunegrænser bliver opdateret lidt efter lidt. Fyn og Sjælland er færdige.
ianlopez1115 (2014-11-09 11:50:04+00:00): Good job on updating the area
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 08:52:58+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is absurdly ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you meant by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3176297863/history ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)
jotpe (2014-11-09 14:58:59+00:00): Irrtümlicher Upload in Änderungssatz 26664911 korriegiert. Gruß Johannes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-28 12:32:28+00:00): Hello!

Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3664051 ?

Why you replaced surface=asphalt by surface=none (I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you remember or can check this location again) ?
jpennycook (2023-04-28 15:51:43+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for the feedback - I've lost my notes from that day, so I've corrected it based on Bing aerial and Bing StreetSide.

Jon
Sanderd17 (2014-12-18 12:05:38+00:00): Aangezien ik de site al verschillende keren bezocht heb kan ik wel vaststellen dat het om een tunnel gaat. De spoorweg is niet zichtbaar verhoogd, terwijl de weg wel zichtbaar verlaagd is. Daarenboven is het spoorwegcomplex ook breder dan het wegcomplex, wat een ander criterium is voor het gebruik van tunnels vs bruggen.

Bij deze is de wijziging dus teruggedraaid.
Sanderd17 (2014-12-18 12:07:48+00:00): Ook de stad spreekt over een tunnel, en niet over een brug: 

http://www.roeselarebereikbaar.be/werken-koning-leopold-iii-laan/
Eimai (2014-12-18 23:08:01+00:00): What's in a name... Ik vind het toch nog meer een brug dan een tunnel :-) Maar het verschil tussen brug en tunnel daar kan je uren over discussiëren.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-13 10:42:46+00:00): Może ukradli?
JJJWegdam (2014-11-10 14:42:02+00:00): Hallo Richard,
aan de hand van je wijzigingen vroeg ik me af of we het busstation niet beter een plein (highway=service, are=yes) kunnen houden aangezien de huidige layout suggereert dat het losse wegen zijn.
Had je verder nog dingen aangepast? Met die feedback kan ik nieuwe stukken dan beter mappen. Alvast bedankt.
Met hartelijke groet,
Jeroen
richardbrinkman (2014-11-11 08:06:44+00:00): Het plein heb ik getagd als public_transport=station (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:public_transport%3Dstation). Daarmee geef je aan dat de area bedoeld is voor bussen en passagiers. De wegen die jij hebt gemarkeerd als highway=service heb ik ongemoeid gelaten. Ze zijn inderdaad niet als zodanig herkenbaar en zouden dus strikt genomen niet ingetekend moeten worden. Aan de andere kant is het wel nuttige informatie voor de buschauffeurs om te weten hoe ze moeten rijden. Ik heb ze dus maar laten staan.
Verdere aanpassingen:
* het overdekte wachthokje heb ik amenity=shelter & shelter_type=public_transport meegegeven
* de specifieke stopplaatsen van de bus heb ik op jouw highway=service wegen aangegeven met public_transport=stop_position
* van de platforms heb ik highway=pedestrian weggehaald (overbodig aangezien je op een platform hoort te kunnen lopen)
* relatie met type=public_transport & public_transport=stop_area toegevoegd en daaronder alle platformen, stop posities, het wachthokje en het busstation zelf laten vallen
* alle overbodige layer=* weggehaald (in jouw situatie kon de bus onder de platformen doorrijden en zouden de passagiers moeten springen om er op te klauteren; ook kruisden er wegen op verschillende layers)
* niet bestaande wandelpaden naar de platforms weggehaald (je mag overal lopen op het busstation)
* alle wegen netjes op elkaar aangesloten
* kruisende wegen voorzien van een gesharede node
* wegen zonder tags weggehaald
* multipolygon relaties zonder tags weggehaald

Hopenlijk zien we bij de volgende Keepright update een stuk minder foutmeldingen.