piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
NM$L (2021-12-04 10:28:58+00:00): 隔壁老王头，您好：

首先感谢您改进地图。但您在变更集114499432、114500078、114500249、114501240、114502264、114502553、114505626、114506422中的更改严重破坏了班公湖片区的关系，我已将其回退，但保留了其中有意义的其他变更。

有时一个多边形过大时，我们会将其拆分为多个线段以方便编辑以及方便构成其它同时使用这些线段作为边界的关系（您可以将这一条线同时添加为两个关系的外部成员，这样就可以不用重复地绘制线段），并添加到一个表示多边形的关系中（关系中会有type=multipolygon这个键），班公湖也是如此。您也许想要将班公湖多边形关系西部的外部成员合并成为一条线，且将东西两部分分开，使用单独的一个要素表示这个巨大的湖，这导致了大量其他相关多边形关系边界出现缺口，关系不完整，地图也无法渲染，请您不要这样做（尤其是您使用iD而不是JOSM编辑时，iD无法编辑显示区域外的要素，大型关系使用iD编辑极其容易出现错误），也请您后续编辑时稍加注意，提交更改前稍加检查，谢谢！
ovruni (2021-12-02 22:27:25+00:00): Hola aklopau_kontur, gracias por contribuir a OSM. Actualmente la relación 1944659 es utilizada por la comunidad OSM para indicar el Departamento de Lima, el cual limita al oeste con la provincia constitucional del Callao, una lista de departamentos y la provincia constitucional se puede encontrar en la wiki de la comunidad [0]. La comunidad de OSM en Perú tiene un canal de telegram [1] y una lista de correos donde se conversan y se coordinan previamente este tipo de cambios. Actualmente hay una discusión relacionado a nombres de limites en el canal de telegram, donde también puede participar.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:ES:Departamentos_en_Per%C3%BA
[1] https://t.me/osmpe
[2] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Emilius123 (2021-12-03 00:59:40+00:00): Bro, is this your path?
snoozingnewt (2021-12-03 01:00:57+00:00): You're not allowed to delete that.
michael60101 (2021-12-03 01:01:17+00:00): Private paths and roads should not be deleted. If it is private, be sure to include the "access=private" tag. Otherwise, this changeset should be reverted.
Alex Paré (2021-12-03 13:38:42+00:00): Hi folks,

This is NOT a trail at all, it's private property field and wood crossing with no defined path.  I'm part of the Bromont Ultra trail running race organisation that raise funds once a Year for a bunch of charities.  WE designed the "path" we are talking about here together with the land owners.  This "path" is meant to be used once a Year only, with flags indicating the way.  We negociate special right to pass with land owners on promise that passing trough will not be posted or made officially visible to the public.  At the start of each run, we insist with runners on not publishing the info to avoid misleading hikers, pissing off land owners and compromising our race for the Years to come.  Strava Heat is shown only because of our race.  This is NOT a path.  Thanks for your understanding.

Alex
cyton (2021-12-03 05:25:20+00:00): entschuldige, woher hast du den hausumring?
in den 2021 bildern sehe ich dieses haus nicht genau an diesem ort, und in den branenburger alkis daten ist die nr 63a auch genauso weiter (ca 7 meter) weiter westlich eingetragen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114499651
user_53559 (2021-12-03 10:20:00+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe die Lage der Hattwichstr. 63A leicht korrigiert.
cyton (2021-12-03 11:13:33+00:00): ja kein ding, die luftbilder sind niemals so genau wie die alkis daten.
auch die verwerfeungsfreien trudop bilder vom sommer 2020 hab ja immer noch die dächer mit drauf, drunter schauen wo die mauer ist ist da unmöglich
blackboxlogic (2021-12-05 16:36:46+00:00): I should have also mentioned that bing streetview is integrated into iD (the editor you're using). On the right-hand toolbar, click 'map data' -> 'photo overlays' -> 'bing streetside'.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114499714
ma-rt-in (2023-02-09 13:55:29+00:00): Hey,

ist zwar ein paar Tage her, aber schau mal hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3546567
Das fällt doch bei dir rein.

vg
SPECTRA995 (2021-12-07 13:40:37+00:00): Hi, Thomas!
Could you please provide any information or sources that confirm existence of these roads ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114500370
eggie (2021-12-03 06:52:08+00:00): Dag Peter,

Wanneer het pad nog in het landschap te zien is, maar onbruikbaar gemaakt dan kun je het taggen met disused:highway
Dit om te voorkomen dat een andere mapper het weer gaat intekeken van bv luchtfoto's.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:highway
Pas als het pad helemaal verdwenen is kan het lijnelement weg. 
Maar een afgesloten pad is natuurlijk nog gewoon een pad met evt. access=private
Zie ook dit draadje 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73238
MVG
eggie
mueschel (2021-12-05 09:56:52+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it got a strange 'communication:r' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9307447864
edc22 (2021-12-02 22:32:51+00:00): forgotten comment:
PL, Częstochowa - ul. Wieluńska - POI, budynki wg KIEG, micromapping
source:
survey; Częstochowa: Orthophotomap 2021 (aerial image); Krajowa Integracja Ewidencji Gruntów: Budynki
muralito (2022-11-19 22:36:53+00:00): Hi. This is ilegal and you will be fined if catch driving it.
flother (2021-12-03 09:05:54+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for all your work updating golf courses around Iceland. If I could make one suggestion, it would be to switch to using Maxar Premium Imagery instead of Bing aerial imagery. Bing can be offset by a quite a few metres in Iceland, Maxar tends to be much more accurate, and higher-resolution too.

Keep up the good work!
rivermont (2021-12-02 22:56:01+00:00): Offsets used: Bing (-1.71, 5.6), Maxar (-2.08, 8.19)
jeka p (2021-12-16 19:46:48+00:00): Hallo Bernhard,

genus=Quercus würde hier besser passen, statt name=Eiche:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:genus

dasselbe für Lärche.

SG
Jeka
ivanbranco (2021-12-04 09:59:30+00:00): Hi So Banzai,

welcome to OSM. We use the english language for keys and values. So diet:vegetarien=* should be diet:vegetarian=*. cuisine=produits_locaux should be cuisine=local or regional

Also use diet tags only for diets.
diet:française=yes eating french is not a diet, so it should be a cuisine=* value (=french).

Good mapping :)
A67-A67 (2021-12-02 23:13:18+00:00): Buurt- en wijknamen worden niet op de residentials getagd. Hier gebruik je normaal een place-node voor.

Als je plaatsgrenzen met place-nodes wil combineren, dan kun je een boundary-relatie maken met de place-node als label, bijvoorbeeld: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8617155

Zie ook: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dplace
Herrieman (2021-12-02 23:16:16+00:00): Dank voor de snelle reactie. Expres daarom had ik ook review requested aangeklikt. Dank voor het voorbeeld, ik ga er verder mee aan de slag!
scai (2023-09-22 08:49:28+00:00): Hi Stephan,

wenn du separate Gehwege hinzufügst, dann bitte diese auch mit der Straße verbinden. Andernfalls ist kein Routing über diese Wege möglich.
Zusätzlich wäre es auch gut, die auf der Straße angebrachten Tags wie sidewalk=both auf sidewalk=separate zu ändern. Andernfalls sind Gehwege doppelt erfasst.

Ich bin gerade dabei manches davon zu korrigieren.

Grüße
Alex
Warin61 (2021-12-03 10:00:37+00:00): It is unlikely to be a 'short cut' ever. 
The idea is an 'inner' cannot touch an 'outer'. 

This looks to have solved the issue.
ChonkerStonker (2021-12-04 17:48:50+00:00): Ohhh, I get it now. It's because those stream areas were classified as 'inner' but they were connected to the 'outer' coastline.
confusedbuffalo (2021-12-04 21:44:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these, try to remember to square buildings (using the shortcut Q or right clicking and selecting "square corners") as it makes the outlines that bit neater
Herrieman (2021-12-02 23:50:15+00:00): Motivatie: suburb suggereert dat beide onderdeel zouden uitmaken van een groter geheel (bijv. stad), dat is niet het geval. Het zijn formele woonplaatsen en er wonen ook enkele mensen, hoewel natuurlijk voornamelijk om commerciële activiteiten gaat. Daarom gekozen voor hamlet.
maraf24 (2022-01-26 21:46:08+00:00): Nadal plac budowy.
michael60101 (2021-12-03 06:25:10+00:00): Private paths and roads should not be deleted. If it is private, be sure to include the "access=private" tag. Otherwise, this changeset should be reverted.
michael60101 (2021-12-03 01:03:29+00:00): Private paths and roads should not be deleted. If it is private, be sure to include the "access=private" tag. Otherwise, this changeset should be reverted.
TomPar (2021-12-03 06:20:38+00:00): ...furthermore, some of the trail segments you deleted are clearly on town-owned land.  I look forward to hearing a response.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114502972
ovruni (2021-12-03 04:58:44+00:00): Hola ecortezm, en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiando una vía a place=city, sin embargo esta etiqueta se encuentra destinada a grandes zonas que incluyen capitales capitales , así como otras grandes ciudades. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place=city?uselang=es
IlBano (2022-12-08 15:02:02+00:00): Ciao fayor.

In questo changeset:
- la way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80515664 è marcata con access=no
- la way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859333405 è a senso unico

E' ancora così la situazione ?

Grazie

IlBano
fayor (2022-12-08 15:19:21+00:00): Ciao. La situazione era così prima di aprire al traffico la rotatoria ma evidentemente ho dimenticato di aggiorare questi due tratti col changeset 115260099. Rimedio subito.
Grazie!
Horza (2021-12-03 01:27:25+00:00): Slightly bigger than expected box because I updated tags on a powerline
InsertUser (2021-12-04 01:15:54+00:00): I don't think Wikidata data is acceptable for immport into OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata#Importing_data_from_Wikidata_into_OSM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114503375
jmaspons (2021-12-06 14:01:40+00:00): Yes, I'm aware of the restrictions on the wikidata imports but in this case I only use the catalan translations of the toponyms which neither have copyright nor came from secondary data sources.
DENelson83 (2022-03-12 22:07:17+00:00): Would you be willing to add the tag "natural"="bay" to the Gulf of Mexico way, #808726001?
jmaspons (2022-03-16 07:25:16+00:00): Hi @DENelson83! I don't know mutch about the area. I am just the last editor because I added the catalan name (name:ca tag). I would better ask the local community or, if you are sure about the proposed change, do it yourself.
mavl (2021-12-04 12:55:57+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок изменил тип здания с building=detached на building=house. Можно узнать причину?
aizmob (2021-12-04 15:13:43+00:00): Виноват! Правильнее будет действительно detached. Исправляю...
GeoMechain (2021-12-08 01:47:35+00:00): Please include a meaningful changeset comment in any future edits you are making. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
edircksen (2021-12-05 14:27:24+00:00): I eyeballed each one and changed the one at a time.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114504084
SomeoneElse (2025-04-16 00:33:26+00:00): It looks like something has gone a bit wrong here - the merge of the building and the roof has created https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13505281/history which is "building=roof;yes".
Narod (2025-04-18 09:44:47+00:00): Thanks for spotting, have corrected that now. Is it maybe better to actually have them split up though? They're both part of the petrol station but they are unique structures so to speak
SomeoneElse (2025-04-21 15:58:25+00:00): There are a few options - one is to keep them as a multipolygon but to remove the "building" tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13505281/history and add "building=yes" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152963307 and "building=roof" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222122213 .  Another option is to draw the larger perimeter of the fuel station area and move the tags to that (without a building tag) or to a node (again without a building tag)
SpecializedRider (2021-12-08 01:45:33+00:00): Reverted entire changeset from a new user for vandalism (for example "My House" and "Satan Church". Please be aware that changes in OSM are monitored and vandalism is not tolerated. 
If you wish to redo your other work, please do it in smaller groups in one small area, instead of one changeset spanning multiple countries.
ALu68 (2021-12-05 10:38:35+00:00): Hello  PrincessMarie,

Welcome to OSM & thanks for your contribution.

Before proceeding with the mapping, please read the wiki first!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide.

Your building tags:
    building=#msf_sea#mazars
    building=building
are not valid.

See wiki for valid tags for buildings https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

Please do not create empty objects.

Regards & Happy mapping.
ovruni (2021-12-03 04:49:17+00:00): Hola ecortezm, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en alguno de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado textos como olmos, olmos city, motupe ciudad, etc. Sin embargo estos no textos no brindan suficiente información sobre los cambios realizados en los conjuntos de cambios, algunos incluso tiene que ver sobre posición de nodos movidos. Por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0] Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:11:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114618626 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with fantasy names and locations.
Adam Franco (2021-12-26 19:09:57+00:00): Hi Himké, For NY highway classifications, we're now using the state's Arterial Classification Code (ACC) to determine which highway=* value to use. The State DOT developed the ACC to inform routing importance (rather than physical structure of a road), which maps directly to the new process for categorizing highways that we're moving to in the US. highway=trunk no longer means "expressway" but rather now is being used for the the most important long-distance routes so that US mapping practice matches how highway=trunk is used in the rest of the world.

The NY DOT has determined that this section of the LaSalle Expressway has ACC=3 due to it being a local connector rather than a regional connector. This maps to highway=primary+expressway=yes in OSM.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:_New_York/Highway_Classification for the new NY guidelines and  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance for the overall project.

A large community of mappers are working on highway classification and discussing in the OSMUS Slack's #local-newyorkstate and #highway-classification channels: https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/ . It would be great for you to join us to discuss there before undoing these changes.
zstadler (2022-01-17 09:25:52+00:00): שלום בועז

תודה על תרומתך למפות!

זה מיקום מאד מפתיע לנקודת תצפית - על גדת נחל ובתוך חורשה

אשמח לעזור לך לתייג נכון את מה שרצית למפות
zstadler (2025-05-30 13:34:43+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166971907
Adam Franco (2021-12-26 19:48:50+00:00): See the comments on your other changeset at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114507228. The NY DOT has given this section of roadway ACC=3 (which makes it highway=primary) because it just provides a local/suburban connection rather through connectivity to other major cities.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114507515
ielham (2022-01-05 16:01:36+00:00): I've added landuse=residential since it's the proper use
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-12-16 12:58:21+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
ApostleIslands (2021-12-17 00:27:56+00:00): Hello Abdullah Abdulrhman, Thank you for reaching out and sharing that resource. I agree that such large changesets are not ideal. I will make sure to remember that policy going forward.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-12-17 02:33:16+00:00): Thank you
Denis_Helfer (2025-09-20 16:50:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Toutes les voies de l'ancienne gare de Strasbourg seront supprimées d'ici une semaine car leur place est dans openhistoricalmap pas dans OSM.
haukep (2021-12-03 07:45:50+00:00): Hallo! Du hast hiermit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/924355540 gelöscht. Dieser Weg wurde erst vor 8 Monaten ergänzt; siehe: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102055356/ Aus welchen Gründen also nun wieder die Löschung?
haukep (2021-12-12 14:02:42+00:00): Ich habe dieses Changeset nun wieder rückgängig gemacht; siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114847459.
user_12328418 (2021-12-03 19:16:54+00:00): Vorschlag:
disused:highway=* ist vielleicht besser - access=no wird vielleicht nicht erkannt.
user_12328418 (2021-12-03 19:21:02+00:00): normal tägliche Aktualisierung - morgen mal schauen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.2581%2C7.6054%3B51.2318%2C7.6577#map=14/51.2460/7.6305&layers=N
Maarten Deen (2021-12-03 19:55:54+00:00): access=no wird öfter benutzt und führt so weit ich weiss nie zu Problemen.
osmviborg (2021-12-03 07:28:48+00:00): Hej. Venligt følg denne vejledningen for 'name' tagget. En del af det du navngiver, burde være tagget som 'description'. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
ivanbranco (2021-12-11 15:55:36+00:00): Hi Seraq,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008802199
the correct value for street side parkings is parking=street_side not streetside
blackboxlogic (2021-12-05 16:44:25+00:00): Hi Paul. Thanks for fixing the road and the city on your house. I feel like I should explain that I did the address import in 2020 and one of the many mistake I made was to mess up the addr:city tags. I'm making my way back through and fixing them but, in the mean-time, you may notice the same issue on nearby addresses. I'll eventually get to them but don't let that stop you from fixing things. Please ask if you have questions, and welcome to OSM. -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114510385
Paul R Reid (2021-12-05 17:07:41+00:00): The Ellsworth/Trenton mixup is a small thing. I was really trying to correct the location of Papas Place. This is an old fire-road now fixed-up for a family enclave. Papas starts across from Henderson, runs north-east with a hook at the end (a camp by a pond).
puma515 (2021-12-03 07:27:58+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical
Lee Carré (2021-12-04 19:44:11+00:00): “ http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical ”

I think you mean http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
ApostleIslands (2021-12-06 19:49:17+00:00): Hi puma515, thank you for catching this and letting me know. I’ll be sure to keep my changesets more targeted in the future.
maraf24 (2021-12-03 09:39:15+00:00): Możesz podać źródło dla geometrii tego węzła?
user_5359 (2021-12-03 18:25:26+00:00): Hello! Please notice, that the currency short cut is written in uppercase letter!
Sylv3st3r (2022-08-26 08:14:10+00:00): Hello.
Thank you!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Lee Carré (2021-12-04 19:39:07+00:00): Thanks.

I'll try to survey this, and verify details (like opening hours).
Lee Carré (2021-12-04 19:45:27+00:00): “user's feedback”

URL?
VitKlim (2021-12-06 08:04:39+00:00): Hello, Lee Carré. Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately, we can't provide you link with user's feedback information , because we use for it our internal tools.
Lee Carré (2021-12-06 15:25:37+00:00): “can't provide you link with user's feedback information , because we use for it our internal tools.”

Then, since it's not a verifiable source, I question if it should be cited at all, or even used. Could be argued as being proprietary information.

I notice that this changeset doesn't supply any http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:source at all. CS comments are for describing the nature & purpose of changes.
VitKlim (2021-12-08 18:30:04+00:00): Thanks for your comment. We use user's feedback like local knowledge with information about this poi. If you have another information about this poi, please share this information with us. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114512526
Lee Carré (2021-12-08 20:06:45+00:00): You either didn't understand my comment, or are choosing to ignore it.

Since I live nearby, I'd simply survey it myself as indicated.

My point was that Mapbox should be sharing with OSM, else not citing as a source info that it is unwilling to share with OSM.

To then ask for yet more info(!) Sorry, but no, on principal; sharing works both ways, not simply one-way. Either Mapbox wants to comply with the spirit of OSM, or it's no better than Google. I, for one, am not going to enable exploitative misbehaviour.

I'll just make my own edits, thanks.
ivanbranco (2021-12-05 08:39:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008815682/history

Cane rosso Clifford il grande?
rhhs (2023-03-01 09:46:25+00:00): Hi Dimi, in this changeset you made edits to a set of 4 switches and a crossing at James Bourchier metro station. I surveyed it yesterday to add internal mapping. That crossing can't be where it's mapped now because that's where the metro platform is. The crossing has to be either north or south of the end of the platform. Did you move the nodes in that change? Or should I message Vatmann who created the switch nodes?
Dimitar155 (2023-03-01 14:48:11+00:00): The crossover point is located to the south of the station.
rhhs (2023-03-01 14:57:40+00:00): OK I guess it was used to reverse the trains before Vitosha station was opened. I'll move them.
What's your source for such information? I noticed that the subway tracks are shown as to the west of the centre of the road above, but in reality they appear to be in the centre, and a bit further apart than mapped.
Dimitar155 (2023-03-01 16:21:26+00:00): That is correct, trains used it to reverse there before Vitosha metro station was constructed. It's a common practice to build 100-150 meters of tunnel after the current last station. In order for the trains to change the tracks, there must be a crossover (a.k.a. X switch). The left track is used to reverse while on the right track you almost always have a reserve train (this is currently the case on all end stations in Sofia (except Obelya and Slivnitsa)).

My source is a few photos on the internet (which I can't find currently), the specific sound of the wheels which they make when passing over the switch and the reserve train that is can be seen in last seconds of this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ixu1lMVP1c).

About the position of the metro tracks, they should be on the outside of the tram tracks (i.e. the lines from east to west should be: sidewalk, metro track, tram track, street, tram track, metro track, sidewalk).
rhhs (2023-03-01 16:53:57+00:00): Thanks! The reserve train is easily visible on Sofia Airport metro station :) I'll make the changes as you suggested.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.