piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
canfe (2021-11-25 19:35:39+00:00): C'è un footway che prima era ellissoidale ed ora no. Possibile??
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114210275
JLZIMMERMANN (2021-12-02 22:35:18+00:00): Bonjour Joseph,
Je découvre que les places PMR ont fortement été décalées. Ce travail que j'ai réalisé m'a pris un week-end calé sur la BD ortho à 5cm de précision.
Je n'arrive pas à comprendre pourquoi ces déplacements car même avec l'ortho IGN les places se trouvent décalées.
Merci
Jean-Louis
JLZIMMERMANN (2021-12-02 22:44:00+00:00): Je pense qu'il y a eu mauvaise manipulation avec mes excuses.
canfe (2021-11-25 19:36:17+00:00): Scusa ho visto dopo la correzione
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114210771
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Frans S (2021-11-25 11:03:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.
Please do not upload every single building you map. Collect them please

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114211253
user_5359 (2021-11-26 14:44:20+00:00): Hello! I modify your key higway:virtual to highway:virtual. By the way what is the different between highway:virtual and virtual:highway? Is there  any discussion or documentation about this keys?
L'imaginaire (2021-11-26 21:49:34+00:00): Hi, good thing you spotted the typo. highway:virtual is mentioned as an alternative for this proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/virtual_highway

So far from an 'official' status at this moment, but there is some use: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway%3Avirtual#values

I think it's mainly used to cross pedestrian areas. In this case, I think we could just continue the path (without :virtual) and connect it to the main road
martin-kokos (2021-11-25 14:06:52+00:00): Also some roads you've added already exist so they were overlapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Frans S (2021-11-25 11:01:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114211843
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-29 16:57:21+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Frans S (2021-11-25 11:02:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
B: Overlapping buildings.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114212207
Frans S (2021-11-25 10:59:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114212506
Frans S (2021-11-25 10:53:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114212684
rene78 (2021-11-25 10:10:29+00:00): FYI: Used OsmAnd+ to record the changes but wasn't able to upload due to conflicts with the database. Thus exported to JOSM via osc file, resolved conflicts and uploaded from there.
kapazao (2021-11-27 15:43:52+00:00): Please, do not use nodes for things like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9282688559
Use notes, regards
rene78 (2021-11-27 15:51:24+00:00): I know that it sucks, but I'll clean it up soon. Give me some more time, please.

I can create notes with OsmAnd, but don't know how to get an overview of all the notes created by me. If that was possible I'd create "notes" from now on with OsmAnd instead of "nodes"...
Frans S (2021-11-25 10:52:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114212765
danieldegroot2 (2021-11-26 13:20:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683374953/history
Regarding this old way, are you sure it is a named alley? Is the footway next to it not an alley?

Regards,

Daniel
Jez Nicholson (2021-11-26 14:11:50+00:00): Hey Daniel,
Good point. Springfield Mews is a new mini-development of 4 houses squeezed between the railway line and the Open House pub. The street sign appeared during the building stage and I mapped it before knowing that it would just be a path. Changed to a footway.....What I don't know is whether the road next to the pub is also Springfield Mews. There has never been a road sign there.
regards, Jez
Hungerburg (2021-11-25 10:55:11+00:00): Es hätte dem woodpeck auffallen können, dass sein revert zigtausende Knoten erstellt. Wo die hier ja im Übermaß regieren. Ich nehme an, er hätte den revert vom revert sicher auch selber übernommen, aber so ist auch gut. Weg mit den Schnörkeln.
Lee Carré (2021-11-26 14:13:43+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
manojkmohan (2022-01-04 13:09:26+00:00): This edit accidentally crossed a propoesed railway line. https://osmcha.org/changesets/114213926/
manojkmohan (2022-01-04 13:10:51+00:00): I fixed it. Pls careful in future https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115754559
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:40:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
NorthCrab (2023-01-12 04:48:39+00:00): Nie używaj nazw opisowych
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006108934#map=19/49.93612/18.98322
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006108933#map=19/49.93586/18.98337
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Frans S (2021-11-25 10:37:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114214651
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:39:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
aixbrick (2021-11-26 13:09:39+00:00): Hallo,
hier sind bei deiner Überarbeitung diverse doppelte Punkte und Gebäude-Überschneidungen entstanden. Ich habe das korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114263200. JOSM müsste da eigentlich Warnungen ausgeben.
Gruß
Dodko (2021-11-26 17:46:17+00:00): Ak vidíš 11 ročnú budovu ktorá na Ortofotomozaika nie je tak ju môžeš zmazať
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54366653
Filip009 (2021-11-26 17:56:17+00:00): Ja upravujem landuse s filtrom, že vidím len landuse=* a natural=*, čiže mi nezavadzajú cesty ani budovy :D
Frans S (2021-11-25 10:36:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects.
E: Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114215818
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:40:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
vorpalblade (2021-11-29 01:37:21+00:00): Would you mind explaining what you were intending to do in your future changeset comments?

I *think* you were just squaring up a diagonal street_side parking area, but I'm not certain.

Since the parking area is a diagonal parking area, it is likely that I will (at some point) get around to redrawing the area to match the on-the-ground reality.
fedoroff net (2021-11-29 11:20:48+00:00): Yes/understood
Polarbear (2022-09-28 05:45:06+00:00): Hi Aleks-Berlin,
es verbessert doch die Datenqualität von OSM gar nicht, wenn du ein ungebräuchliches Tag mit Hochkomma durch ein ungebräuchliches Tag ohne Hochkomma ersetzt, ohne zu dem Objekt selbst zu recherchieren?
Aleks-Berlin (2022-09-28 09:32:51+00:00): Hallo Polarbear, das tut mir leid. Aus meiner Sicht sollten problematische Zeichen raus aus allen Tags. Vor weinigen Jahren gab es z.B. tausende Tags mit einem (unsichtbaren!) 0x7F Zeichen drin. Der Name sah gut aus, war aber daruch nirgends auffindbar (via verschiedene Suchfunktionen (egal ob APIs oder Website). Und einige Zeichen führten zu einem Updatestop auf taginfo.openstreetmap.org.
Daher würde ich schon sagen, dass einige Zeichen zumindest fragwürdig wenn nicht gar problematisch sind. Ich hoffe du nimmst mir dies nicht übel.
MfG, Alexander
rednail (2025-02-08 15:40:49+00:00): Hallo,
ich glaube in dem Gebiet hier sind einige Zugangsbeschränkungen falsch. Durch das Update des Kartenstils auf https://www.openstreetmap.org sieht man verdächtige Tags nun leichter.
Access=forest bedeutet, dass nur Forstleute den Weg betreten dürfen, egal ob zu Fuß, mit Fahrrad oder KfZ. Abgesehen von den Wegen in der Kernzone gehe ich davon aus, dass motor_vehicle=forestry gemeint ist. In der Kernzone ist auf normalen Wegen wahrscheinlich vehicle=forestry korrekt, d.h. abgesehen von Forstleuten sind nur Fußgänger u. Reiter erlaubt.
Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Mit Overpass kann man finden, wo access=forestry getaggt ist und man selbst die letzte Änderung gemacht hat. Das heißt nicht, dass man selbst dort access=forestry getaggt hat. Die Ergebnisse kann man dann über exportieren bspw. in JOSM übernehmen. Ich will damit nicht sagen, dass access=forestry dort überall falsch ist.
Hier der Link zur Abfrage:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1YrJ
(Bildausschnitt lässt sich auch verschieben und dann kann man eine neue Abfrage für dieses Gebiet machen).
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:39:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
pesec (2021-11-25 11:57:03+00:00): Ваш пакет правок добавляет новую улицу, которая ни с чем не соединена. Такого допускать нельзя из-за связности улично-дорожной сети.
Кроме того эта улица проектируемая, по факту её нет.
Frans S (2021-11-25 10:54:46+00:00): Hello.
Please read the comments on your mappings and learn from them !!!
Frans S (2021-11-25 11:42:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114216891
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
CRCulver (2022-01-19 22:00:29+00:00): You set Bydgoska street at 53.13721, 17.60213 to oneway=yes. Is this really accurate? Both Mapillary and aerial imagery show that traffic on this part of the road flows in both directions.
Przemek | Yanosik (2022-01-20 07:10:30+00:00): https://kurier-nakielski.pl/uwaga-zmiana-organizacji-ruchu-w-centrum-nakla-nad-notecia/
Nielkrokodil (2021-11-27 18:04:39+00:00): Hallo Martin, herzlich willkommen bei OSM und danke für deinen Eintrag.

Ein Hinweis für die Zukunft: Wenn ein Geschäftslokal von einem anderen Shop bezogen wird, dann trägt man das idealerweise auf dem selben Knotenpunkt ein, anstatt einen neuen Knotenpunkt anzulegen. Das hat den Vorteil, dass man im Verlauf des Knotens erkennen kann, dass dort früher etwas anderes war, bzw. was das war.

Du hast den bestehenden Knoten gelöscht und einen neuen an fast der selben Stelle angelegt. Ist nicht weiter schlimm, aber bitte in Zukunft anders machen.

Danke, lg
Nielkrokodil
user_2066394 (2021-11-25 16:19:12+00:00): Das Teil hätte man doch rüberschieben können?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:39:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
skyper (2021-11-25 11:34:08+00:00): Danke :)
skyper (2021-11-25 12:21:33+00:00): Mmh, leider eine Route und die stop_area vergessen. Habs gefixt.
Ted Pottage (2021-12-11 11:46:13+00:00): Good to see you are marking up accessibility, do you have photos to show the details that you can upload to the Wheelmap page:  https://wheelmap.org/nodes/4784717881  Examples at another NT property Box Hill here: https://wheelmap.org/nodes/287373456
Ut Fietsmenneke (2021-12-30 20:33:17+00:00): Op grondgebied gemeente Venlo heeft de N273 de naam Napoleonsbaan en niet Napoleonsbaan Noord.  In gemeente Peel en Maas heeft een deel van de N273 de naam Napoleonsbaan Noord.
Nölke75 (2021-12-30 20:54:24+00:00): In PDOK  staat Napoleonsbaan_Noord Venlo, zoek er maar eens op. Daar wordt dit hele stuk gemarkeert en in het stukje net voor rotonde Mulkenshof staat het zelfs. Anders staat fout in de basisregistratie.
Ut Fietsmenneke (2021-12-31 15:47:10+00:00): Ik heb navraag bij de bron gedaan. Hierbij hun mail reactie
FM_Info <info@venlo.nl>
Wo 29-12-2021 16:05
Aan: U
In Venlo is de naam Napoleonsbaan
Met vriendelijke groet,
Nico Driessen
Specialist Document Services
Gemeente Venlo | Team Publieke Informatievoorziening en Gemeentearchief
Bezoekadres: Hanzeplaats 1 Venlo | Postbus 3434, 5902 RK Venlo
Nölke75 (2022-01-01 09:05:49+00:00): Dan klopt het niet in de BGT
Ik heb daarom nu ook melding gemaakt in verbeterdekaart.nl BGT00096458.
Als ik hier de officiële bevestiging van heb pas ik het weer aan.
Basstoelpel (2022-04-28 20:46:47+00:00): Moin FTeepe,

ein spätes aber dennoch herzliches Willkommen bei OpenStreet Map. Ich hoffe, daß Du auch weiterhin zu OSM beiträgst, auch wenn Du vielleicht nur die vorhandenen Daten auf Korrektheit prüfst.

Eine kleine Kritik zu Deinen Einträgen: Ein Objekt sollte nur einmal in der Datenbank sein, eine Hausnummer sollte also entweder als ein einzelner Punkt gemappt sein oder am Gebäudeumriß hängen aber bitte nicht beides.

Schöne Grüße,

Baßtölpel
BCNorwich (2021-11-25 13:40:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've reverted this changeset because you've somehow inadvertently dragged a couple of features out of alignment.

Need any help please just ask here.

Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2021-11-25 13:08:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114220476
E de Wit (2021-11-29 19:17:40+00:00): Ter info:
De overige schade is nu ook ongedaan gemaakt in changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114373992
smootheFiets (2021-11-29 19:27:11+00:00): Kijk, ik had het niet door dat er nog meer stuk was gegaan. Goed dat jij het in de gaten hout!
E de Wit (2021-11-29 19:42:59+00:00): Ik zag toevallig de discussie met JeroenHoek in changeset 114146524 en vroeg me af of er veel schade door deze mapper was ontstaan in Nederland, ik heb eerder in IJlst redelijk wat gebouwen moeten reverten door dezelfde mapper.

Nog twee changesets (113855580 & 113828673) bij Amsterdam hebben voor schade gezorgd, met name aan gebouwen.
Deze zal ik vanavond ook even grotendeels terugdraaien.
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:39:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park