piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2022-07-11 19:54:05+00:00): HI marine,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9880925514

this is not how the place tag is used, in this case it would be better an addr:full, or even better addr:city+addr:street+addr:housenumber ecc.

could you check it out please?
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-11 17:47:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

What's "new"? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Alvarado2510 (2024-05-05 23:55:30+00:00): Saludos Rick Morales, encontre que la quebrada de Boca Chica es limite entre los distrito de almirante y changuinola, queria solicitarte permiso para corregir eso en tu edición, que difiere de la ley, en espera de tu respuesta.
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-11 17:47:46+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
derkrazykraut (2022-07-13 14:56:20+00:00): Ah sorry, okay I'll do that.
englu (2022-07-12 09:00:58+00:00): Usunąłeś przejście przez tory w Zygmuntowie Mazowieckim. Wcześniej była tam ścieżka z access=no (nielegalne przejście) i notatka, że biegnie tamtędy niebieski szlak turystyczny (https://mazowsze.szlaki.pttk.pl/121-pttk-mazowsze-popowo-koscielne-pks-lipnik-majorat-pomnik). Wiem, że w OSM nie ma relacji tego szlaku, ale czy usunięcie tej ścieżki było konieczne? Teraz dodanie relacji nie będzie możliwe.
Anas masuris (2022-07-12 09:14:10+00:00): No już nie przesadzajmy, że dodanie relacji nie będzie możliwe i nie wyolbrzymiajmy problemu do nie wiadomo jakiej rangi - można dodać z powrotem ścieżkę podczas tworzenia relacji (której o dziwo nie ma). Dodam z powrotem tę ścieżkę za chwilkę
JassKurn (2022-07-12 13:20:37+00:00): Hi, it looks like this is one of your first edits submitted to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for the input, but... there's a few problems with the data. 

You added loads of useful data, but many of the objects you mapped appear to be already mapped (eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9880986226), and some appear to be personal info submitted in error (eg   https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9880986228#map=17/50.64738/-3.42791). 

Also, submitting data for a large area is considered bad practice because it can be difficult to check. It would have been better of each of this points to have submitted as an individual changeset, or as small groups of changes in  local areas, where errors can be easily spotted by local mappers.

How do you wish to proceed? You could work through changes using one of available editors. Data your not sure about could be added as note, rather than a map change. It is also possible to simply delete (revert) the entire changeset, but that would involve the loss of useful info.
lakedistrict (2022-07-26 22:37:33+00:00): Hi @IG987, in the areas I've checked, this edit has introduced a number of duplicates, and things that look like personal bookmarks rather than things that actually exist on the ground. 

@JassKurn you mention that there is some useful info in this changeset? I didn't notice any, so I suggest a revert.
JassKurn (2022-07-26 23:41:19+00:00): @lakedistrict There is some useful data for artwork type objects, but overall the changeset is clearly a problem. Looking at it again it appears to have added a lot of data. I agree with now doing a revert. I can add the useful data local to me sometime in the future.
JassKurn (2022-07-26 23:55:03+00:00): I've reverted the changeset - The revert changeset is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124116279
eggie (2022-07-12 07:11:09+00:00): Dag pe... Wanneer iets niet (meer) klopt kun je dit doorgeven aan het Kadaster middels een terugmelding. Gewoon even op het potloodje klikken er wordt met je opmerking wat gedaan.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Klokjesbloemlaan%2049&resultOffset=0&objectId=0344200000108680&geometry.x=128840.82200257&geometry.y=456619.93400042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0344010000118236

Dan zal bij de volgende periodieke import alles weer kloppen. Wanneer het Kadaster niets aanpast komt de oude vorm weer terug in OSM
Doe je zelf een terugmelding?
MVG
eggie
abakus_uploader (2022-07-11 22:32:36+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
muralito (2022-07-11 21:39:48+00:00): Hola. UTE no es "government". "government" seria URSEA.
Las oficinas estas irian con https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Denergy_supplier
rempshaener (2022-07-17 17:22:41+00:00): Hallo,
entschuldige meine kleine Gehässigkeit, aber was war denn hier die Quelle? Ich beziehe mich speziell auf dieses Gebäude: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002373669. Ich bezweifle, dass das Gebäude so als fertiggestellt gelten kann: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHuk2LtFgdQ
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2022-07-17 20:02:36+00:00): P.S. Das kann m.E. so bleiben, auf ein paar Wochen kommt es nicht an.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-02 00:58:57+00:00): Reverted by DWG as undiscussed import from undisclosed sources: changeset/133192672
Lejun (2022-07-14 08:50:31+00:00): Est-ce qu’il y a une raison particulière pour avoir utilisé path, plus généraliste que footway ?
maciek-szn (2022-07-11 14:13:30+00:00): Wycofane w całości ze względu na istotne uszkodzenia geometrii istniejących obiektów.
BeKri (2022-10-28 16:27:15+00:00): Wenn man es vorher wüste ...
Da hast Du erst im Juli die 4 Häuser eingezeichnet.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123476655
(und die daneben)
und jetzt sind sie weg
oder Ersi damals schon stark veraltet.
hab sie auf demolished: gesetzt

happy tagging derBeKri
tastrax (2022-07-12 06:41:26+00:00): Given how good the Bing imagery is for Hobart, it would be good if you could go back and edit the outlines of them to better match the actual buildings. Quality work is best in the long run.
CrazyKim117 (2022-07-13 00:06:29+00:00): Hi tastrax,
Sorry to reply late. With your good advise, I re-aligned all buildings and houses that I did with Mopbox satelite. Now, you might find the shape of the houses are not just square anymore. Using a Bing imagery is such a good tool to work for drawing a map. If there are anything wrong while I work, send me a message or leave a comment like this and I will fix them. Cheers, Kim.
NieWnen (2022-07-11 14:03:43+00:00): *przepust
Azharul Islam Anik (2024-02-18 15:12:13+00:00): Fixed the error. Thanks for the contribution.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-11 14:15:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 123455005, 123454971.
jodd (2022-07-12 20:54:01+00:00): Hallo symtll,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deine Eintragungen. Du hast ja die App MapComplete verwendet, leider weiß ich nicht, wie sie funktioniert und was passiert ist.

Du hast zwei Poller eingetragen, die jetzt mitten auf der Friedberger Landstraße stehen. Das kann nicht ganz richtig sein. Wo sind denn die Poller, die du eintragen wolltest?
Es geht um diese zwei Objekte, die du eingefügt hast:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9881165898
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9881131392

Wenn du Hilfe brauchst, gibt einfach Bescheid.

Viele Grüße
jodd
questmarker (2022-07-12 12:05:42+00:00): Hi, du hast hier bei einem Stück vom Steinweg den highway tag entfernt. War das ein Fehler oder wurde die Straße abgerissen?
eggie (2022-07-11 15:56:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  .. In OSM Nederland gebruiken we uitsluitend de adresnodes om op bij te taggen. Dus liever geen adres- en bedrijfsinfo op de gebouwomtrek. Nr 29 is trouwens het gebouw aan de oostzijde.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-11 16:05:03+00:00): De info heb ik verplaatst naar adresnode 29. 
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2024-05-15 23:00:25+00:00): Hi AntReid,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9877651243

this tree doesn't seem to be this tall, could you take a look at it? Maybe was supposed to be 1.15? 

Thanks and good mapping :)
NieWnen (2022-08-17 11:07:37+00:00): Czy ta budowa nadal trwa? Opening_date był wyznaczony na ponad 2 tyg temu?
Tomek | Yanosik (2022-08-17 11:16:11+00:00): Witam, ślady gpx wskazują, że remont się zakończył, już wprowadzam zmiany
Sandal man (2022-07-12 18:08:45+00:00): Hola, gracias por tus ajustes al OSM, pero firmaste una relacion sin caminos?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14344708
Saludos Jan
Sandal man (2022-07-29 19:34:42+00:00): Deleted
Dodko (2022-07-11 16:13:49+00:00): Treba pozrieť dokumentáciu k 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
a tie cesty čo ste pridali 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077715372
zmeniť na poľné cesty highway=track
alebo na príjazdové cesty
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077715354
highway=service
service=driveway
Dodko (2022-07-11 16:17:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077715352
na tie krivo nakreslené budovy treba používať funkciu zarovnanie do pravého uhlu skratka Q.
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-30 13:37:22+00:00): Hi jnighan,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
jnighan (2022-07-31 12:19:55+00:00): Hi, Pascal. The address dataset we used in the CT Building and Address Import (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/CT_Building_and_Address_Import) is less complete than the National Address Database, so I overlayed that set over Manchester and deleted duplicates. I also manually added some based on the Town of Manchester GIS viewer. Best, Jack
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-31 12:28:18+00:00): Hi Jack, great, thanks for your answer. Could you also add/link your mentioned wiki page here? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue

Thanks!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:20:00+00:00): No use el mapa para marcas personales, solo información de relevancia pública.
bxl-forever (2022-07-11 15:41:46+00:00): Delhaize Anspach has been on the map since 2013, no need to create a duplicate.

Your change has been reverted.
Dodko (2022-07-11 16:08:23+00:00): K poľným cestám je dobré vyplniť aj akej kvality je.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
SekeRob (2022-07-11 18:35:28+00:00): Hi,

Really strange, when I surveyed then (march or so) there was a no-entry sign at the NW exit i.e. oneway. You removed the oneway tag but left the source:oneway=sign. See 2 ticket vending machine poles just after both gates, left side, suggesting the no-entry has gone NW in which case the source:oneway needs to go too.

cheers
FinixFighter (2022-07-12 08:07:24+00:00): Ops, I forgot to remove it, thank you for pointing out. Anyway yes, this area is a bit strange XD I also want to check if Via Costantino Barbella is really one way, because I remember two things: 1) cars going in both directions, 2) a sign indicating one way, but in opposite direction than how it's mapped. I'll check asap
SekeRob (2022-07-12 08:24:16+00:00): Barbella SW side I updated last night, added a back parking, adjusted park fencing. Whether NE direction or SW direction on the remaining 1-way is open, but logic suggests it should be SW as else the parking would not be accessible from the LCC North gate.
FinixFighter (2022-07-12 10:15:30+00:00): Yep, I also think so.
ovruni (2022-07-11 20:11:18+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado varios pasos y cruces de peatones sin motivo aparente, indicando solamente "DETALLES", por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:04:49+00:00): recibido
literan (2022-07-11 17:15:41+00:00): зачем вы удаляете корректные теги? откат
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
StephaneP (2022-09-02 09:46:50+00:00): Bonjour,

En France, les école maternelles sont taggées amenity=school et pas amenity=kindergarten
cf : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dschool#R%C3%A8gles_sp%C3%A9cifiques_%C3%A0_la_France

J'ai fait la correction.

Bonne journée

Stf
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-11 16:04:06+00:00): "H" is wrong typing……

What I wanna to say is "Horqin, Inner Mongolia AR"
skyper (2023-01-12 14:15:51+00:00): Habe ich zurückgesetzt und `access=no` verwendet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131190659
ovruni (2022-07-11 20:14:21+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado varios objetos sin motivo aparente, indicando solamente "DETALLES", de manera similar al conjunto de cambios 123481564, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:03:31+00:00): entiendo
archie (2022-07-11 17:02:43+00:00): Hej, är det här verkligen en rastplats? Det ser mer ut som en parkeringsplats från satellitbilden.
abakus_uploader (2022-07-11 22:32:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
Eiim (2022-07-11 23:25:05+00:00): Hello,
I'd like to remind you to add a % or ° to your value of incline. Also, since I didn't see any negative values on your inclines, be sure that the incline is in the direction of the way. Both are explained here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
JasonBob (2022-10-11 22:23:48+00:00): Please do give places new addresses based on unofficial street names. The Embarcadero is generally what the area southeast of here is called, but the address is North Harbor Drive.
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
Gustavo22Soares (2022-10-22 14:59:58+00:00): Oi, seja bem vinda ao openstreetmap
pfvr quando for mapear uma edificio não utilize a tag landuse=residential use a tag building=yes
obrigado!
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
opendcc (2022-07-11 19:50:43+00:00): In der zitierten Quelle ist Appenzell aber auch nicht Bestandteil der Aplen.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Alpenkarte.svg
RobinHx (2022-07-17 05:35:27+00:00): Die Appenzeller Alpen sind bis 2500 m hoch, im zitierten Bild sind sie auch eingezeichnet, grün, zwischen Zürcher See und Bodensee. Die Gebirgsgruppe Appenzeller Alpen ist  nicht flächengleich mit den beiden Appenzeller Kantonen oder mit der Region Appenzellerland.
RobinHx (2022-07-19 19:49:30+00:00): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpen#/media/Datei:Alpenkarte.svg Da muss ein Fehler bei wikipedia sein, im kleinen Bild sind die Appenzeller Alpen grün eingezeichnet, wenn man reinzoomt, sind sie plötzlich außerhalb der Alpen.
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
mavl (2022-07-12 15:36:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123526467 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481651].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 10:00:33+00:00): fixme:type=eatch

to miało jakąś wartość?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9881528749/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 10:00:38+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9881528749/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 10:01:37+00:00): aj, źle nacisnąłem - to drugie zignorować można
Rogoyski (2025-04-28 17:57:20+00:00): To musiała być nieudana próba napisania watch(maker). Musiałem nie zauważyć, że EveryDoor dodał takie fixme. 

Widzę, że już poprawiłeś, dzięki.
Frans S (2022-08-28 13:23:34+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, You did not square the buildings with the Q key.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123485406
mueschel (2022-07-29 08:27:34+00:00): Hi,
could you specify what a "mofa:electric" is? I think we don't have this vehicle classification anywhere else. That would be a motorcycle that is allowed to drive up to 25 km/h with an electric motor, but does not look like a bicycle? 
Which traffic signs are there exactly?
eggie (2022-07-29 09:03:06+00:00): Herrieman.. Is de fiets oversteek kruisweg nu wellicht tweerichting? 
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-07-29 09:08:02+00:00): .. wegen tijdelijk of voor langere tijd op access=no zetten worden in de praktijk nog wel eens vergeten.
Misschien highway=construction construction=cycleway ?
eggie (2022-07-29 09:47:49+00:00): Eigenlijk begrijp ik niet wat dat fietspad op de kruising Planetenweg -Kruisweg daar doet, want de Kruisweg staat op slot voor fietsers. Maar ik begrijp nu dat het voor bromfietsen is bedoeld.
Groet,
eggie
Herrieman (2022-07-30 16:09:04+00:00): @eggie, klopt het is nu alleen voor bromfietsen, daarom zo gemapt. Origineel was het een oversteek voor fietsers om de Planetenweg te bereiken, maar die is nu afgesloten (voor fietsers). Is een beetje vreemde situatie nu (zowel in het echt als op OSM), maar dat wordt pas later opgelost als alle werkzaamheden af zijn.
eggie (2022-07-30 16:10:51+00:00): Duidelijk... bedankt voor je reactie..
Gr eggie