piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cyton (2022-02-10 22:19:28+00:00): Ja genau, soll nur ein hinweis sein, die changesets erscheinen sonst überall bei osmcha. Das ist auch kein fehler in dem sinn, eher sowas wie stil, wenn überhaupt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117177586
PT-53 (2022-02-24 08:13:48+00:00): Hallo FoxtrtGold,
nach Deinen Bearbeitungen bei Dietmannsried werden im QS-Tool keep right mehrere Hinweise "mehrere Punkte an einem Fleck" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=47.81009&lon=10.27989&zoom=14&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C20

Soweit es sich dabei (nur) um übereinander liegende Knoten von Landuse-Flächen handelt, sollten diese Knoten miteinander verschmolzen werden.
Machst Du das noch?
Bitte aber nicht Highway-Knoten und Landuse-Knoten übereinander legen und verkleben.

Wiki - keep right:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Keep_Right

Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
FoxtrotGolf (2022-02-24 21:02:39+00:00): Hallo @PT-53,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe die "mehrere Punkte an einem Fleck" Warnungen die Aufgrund meiner Änderung rein gekommen sind mit Änderungssatz #117827698 wieder behoben.

Viele Grüße,
FoxtrotGolf
PT-53 (2022-02-25 07:18:19+00:00): Hallo FoxtrtGold, 
vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung und Bereinigung.
Grüße
pyram (2022-05-06 17:37:30+00:00): Hier ist kein UPS. Der ist zwar hier, aber in einem anderen Gebäude/Adresse. War der Eintrag nur geraten/von einer Liste und ohne Ortskenntnis abgemalt?
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-10 12:28:05+00:00): And a restaurant @ Villa San Giovanni, Reggio di Calabria, Kalabrien, 89018, Italien

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6886885171#map=13/38.2216/15.6392
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-14 14:46:13+00:00): Please don't mark large areas as 1 building
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117177947
BCNorwich (2022-02-10 19:04:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You placed the service road on top of an existing highway making for duplication. I've removed the new way and amended the existing way as per OSM practice. All good now.

Regards Bernard.
Syl (2022-03-02 16:43:01+00:00): Bonjour, à quoi correspondent ces deux éléments dans un champ : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9490941225 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9490941226 ?
Denis_Helfer (2022-03-02 16:49:16+00:00): Bonjour,

A part un copié/collé malheureux, je ne vois pas !!!!
Correction effectuée : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118026574
Merci pour la vigilance
Lulucmy (2023-05-02 16:49:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Concernant ce `way`, savez-vous ce qu'il représente : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41751917 ?
Cdlt,
jcr83 (2023-05-03 06:26:33+00:00): Bonjour,
Si on regarde l'historique, on voit qu'à l'origine c'était landuse=meadow. Mais un contributeur inexpérimenté a fait des modifications incorrectes. Je pense que vous pouvez le rétablir.
wireguy (2022-02-11 20:20:01+00:00): Hi Chris, 
looks like you also deleted a section of the Hoback boundary relation.
ChrisOwen (2022-02-12 00:17:22+00:00): Im sorry I must have done it by accident while editing a trail in the Game Creek area.  Please feel free to restore it as I am unsure which bit I deleted.
wireguy (2022-02-12 01:20:12+00:00): ok, also corrected South Park.
SherbetS (2022-04-14 14:24:20+00:00): thank you.
literan (2022-02-09 15:53:56+00:00): перестаньте, пожалуйста, делать дубли уже добавленных вами магазином. Спайхит уже в пятый раз добавляете
ЕХРЕRT (2022-02-09 17:55:32+00:00): Я не добавлял ничего по 5 раз. Я через приложение Organic Maps добавлял один раз.
literan (2022-02-09 18:03:20+00:00): понятно. Тем не менее, точки добавляются немного в разных местах:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/VladislavKh/history

возможно, так глючит приложение. Пока ни у кого более не наблюдалось...
literan (2022-02-09 18:05:16+00:00): впрочем, нет, в одном и том же месте. Точно глюк. Вот 5 минут назад еще раз добавилось https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117213466

Вы случайно в чате Organic maps не состоите?
ЕХРЕRT (2022-02-09 18:51:53+00:00): Нет в чатах меня. Просто поглядел у себя на районе что да как и немного внёс правки. Я по несколько раз одно и тоже не делал, не знаю как это происходит
literan (2022-02-09 19:53:50+00:00): ясно, это не ваша вина, напишу в чат программы.

вносите еще, другие точки )
jaap de vries (2022-02-11 11:20:31+00:00): Ik merk dat je de Pietersberg hebt aangepast, ben je bekend dat het landhuis de Pietersberg ook hier onder valt? Graag even aanpassen.
jaap de vries (2022-02-11 12:20:22+00:00): Ik zie dat de Bergen op Zoomse allee ook op andere paden staat, w.o. parallel aan de oorsprong beek, waarom heb je dat aangepast?
jaap de vries (2022-02-11 12:23:55+00:00): De gedenkzuil staat nu in de rechter onder hoek van de paden, terwijl deze in het midden staat. Kan je uitleggen waarom je deze niet in het midden zet?
Tilia_J (2022-02-12 20:58:46+00:00): Perceel Pietersbergseweg 19 hoort niet bij de overdracht aan GLK en is in eigendom van Gemeente Renkum gebleven

Bergen op Zoomse Allee ingekort tot aan gedenkzuil. Ik kan me alleen herinneren dat er aan de Oostkant een bordje staat, dus was een samenvoegfout.

Gedenkzuil stond óp het kruispunt (node)van ways, deze had ik daarom losgetrokken. Dit soort objecten map  ik altijd afzonderlijk van ways.  Door zoomniveau niet in de gaten dat afstand wel erg groot was. Nu chicer opgelost
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 12:22:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9491021528/history has building = proposed that was added in this edit
Is this building existing now? Are there at least real plans for building it? If there are no serious plans for it - that should be entirely deleted. If construction started then building=construction is a better tag. If construction is upcoming then source for this claim should be tagged on the geometry itself (source tag, note tag) and different tagging should be used - we are mapping proposed features in OpenStreetMap very sparingly, not every promise or business plan should be mapped here.
maro21 (2022-02-12 17:58:57+00:00): What is "Majkoltrans"?
filu (2022-02-12 22:50:28+00:00): A sort of railway company. http://www.majkoltrans.pl/en/contact.html
They have this cool Ls40 loc just in front of their building here.
maro21 (2022-02-17 21:22:42+00:00): So it lacks a main POI tag, like office=company. Because now it's just a name of a building. I've added this tag.
Leo Slager (2022-02-09 18:25:50+00:00): Top, dat ziet er perfect uit.
RicoElectrico (2022-02-09 12:11:46+00:00): Cześć, taki adres był obok: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8223887430
Hype420 (2022-02-09 23:42:32+00:00): Cześć. W rzeczywistości ten adres co był obok to 61. Byłem osobiście na miejscu i zweryfikowałem. Znajduje się tam klub sportowy MOSiR.
Hype420 (2022-02-09 23:50:59+00:00): W sensie pod adresem Kusocińskiego 53 znajduje się klub MOSiR.
AgusQui (2022-02-12 03:39:09+00:00): Rompiste la relación de CABA con este cambio
i2004 (2022-02-14 01:42:14+00:00): ESTOY  CREANDO LA FUTURA CICLOIVA DE AV LIBERTADOR
AgusQui (2022-02-14 10:45:34+00:00): Paso por ahí todos los días, cuando se habilite estará mapeada de primera mano.
Marcello Perathoner (2022-02-09 21:42:57+00:00): I did a survey of the Keschtnweg from Brixen down to St. Verena and I'm pretty sure that the Jakobsweg between Villanders and Barbian follows the current route of the Keschtnweg. (The current route is in OSM, also all guideposts that I found.)

Whatever sources you have may be outdated and are following a previous route of the Keschtnweg.

There is a new footbridge too south of Barbian worth taking.
MaximusIT (2022-03-24 10:58:19+00:00): Hi Marcello,

sorry, was busy for a while.
I had as source the actual https://www.jakobswegsuedtirol.it/ witch seems to be a succesor of www.jakobsweg.it. I found in the wayback machine also the older (or maybe the correct) waydescriptions. A major discrepancy for example is the description from Bozen to Andrian. Even on jakobswegsüdtirol.it there is a discrepancy between the italian an the german waydescription. I took then as source also gpx data from http://www.jakobswege-europa.de and as reference also https://camino-europe.eu/de/eu/. This why now exist two Jakobswege. Jakobsweg 1 tries to reconstruct the way from the descriptions given (for example the way via the Freudpromenade from Klobenstein to Oberbozen). Jakobsweg 2 is from the gpx data. Obviously a survay on the ground would be the best. I noticed that some is done by the TV's in Eisacktal and also in the upper Vinschgau, than there are trailblazes from the EU sponsored project (witch where put with the original jakobsweg.it, now defunct) and i saw newer trail blazes as stickers.. (sometimes hard do discover... ).

What i will do in the next few weeks, time permitting, finish mapping Jakobsweg 1 and 2 from Vahrn to Mals, in the method described above and maybe then we should collect data on the ground to get the correct way (guideposts and trail blazes.. ).. and than notify eventually the websites that they correct their data..
Allison P (2022-02-09 01:06:26+00:00): Why is an edit for a HOTOSM project in Mauritania stretching into Idaho?
Horza (2022-02-09 06:35:46+00:00): Looks like two normal edits smooshed into one, probably by iD recovering a previous edit that wasn't saved properly.

But yes, if you could save before changing regions that would be much appreciated.
Warin61 (2022-02-09 22:46:31+00:00): Hi,

The Putty State Forest is not a land cover ... and should not be changed to match tree cover or any other land cover. The Putty State Forest is truly a 'land USE'. 
Changeset partly reverted to restore Putty State Forest.
AndrewS (2022-02-10 01:04:45+00:00): Hmm, I'm confused. Not sure what I did to 'change' Putty State Forest. Sorry about that. Was it caused by adding an inner area to its relations? Or maybe by the self-intersection I created (now fixed).
What I wanted was for the cleared area to be shown as 'grass' cover (although it should probably be 'meadow') and Putty State Forest 'Managed Forest'  seemed to be the right relation for this area to be the 'inner' of. I have now found the much larger 'wood' that encloses all of this huge area and related the areas to that. 
I need to learn JOSM, iD is lacking in showing any relations that aren't on-screen. the larger 'wood' never appears in iD and I mucked up the whole of the northern 'wood' of this region when I inadvertently dissected the internal 'wood' boundary you added a few years ago. iD did not show that boundary as it has no nodes in the on-screen area and reported no error.
PS I probably would have eventually found the error you picked as I've been checking OSMI. The delay is problematic though.
Warin61 (2022-02-10 09:26:40+00:00): One of the 'problems' is that renders regard landuse=forest to be the same as natural=wood. 

The Putty State Forest includes grass areas .. and residential areas ... these should not be excluded form it. Much like a National Park has tree areas, rock areas, grass areas.. all part of the National Park. 

The mapper who added the large tree area is simply mapping trees - not the land use.
englu (2022-02-10 20:27:33+00:00): Czy ul. Zdunowska zmieniła się teraz z residential na pedestrian? Jeśli teraz jest to deptak, to oneway=yes oznaczałoby, że piesi mogą poruszać się w jedną stronę, a tak chyba nie jest (?). Zatem czy nie trzeba usunąć oneway=yes?
Patryk Piotrowski (2022-02-10 21:52:53+00:00): Zmieniłem. W praktyce, organizacja ruchu zmieniła się 4-5 lat temu. Nie jest jednak jednoznaczna, istnieje oznakowanie jednokierunkowe, ograniczenia wjazdu m. in. dla służb, dostawców etc. Zaktualizuję po wizycie w terenie. Na ten moment, najważniejsze, by tranzyt i Kowalski nie wjechali, bo nie powinni.
englu (2022-02-11 08:19:10+00:00): Ok, to chyba lepiej zostawić tam drogę highway=residential + oneway=yes i dać access=delivery + foot=yes + bicycle=yes.
Patryk Piotrowski (2022-02-11 10:04:06+00:00): Wstrzymam się do czasu przeprowadzenia wizji terenowej, bo z tego co pamiętam, tam jest strefa zamieszkania z licznymi restrykcjami, sytuacja analogiczna dla zachodniej części Rynku, Małego Rynku, Farnej i innych. Pedestrian może nie być szczęśliwym rozwiązaniem. Zbadam oznakowanie.
dadavid (2024-06-17 13:10:04+00:00): Hi wermak, 

ist das hier [1] wirklich die "Josef-Deutschmann-Straß" und nicht "... Straße" mit "e" am Ende? 

Grüße und Danke dir fürs Drüberschauen :) 

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168689801
wermak (2024-06-20 16:06:10+00:00): Korrigiert. Danke.

Schöne Grüße
Frans S (2022-02-09 08:57:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here 
A remark. You tend to map the round buildings rather oversized. (till 2x the diameter) Please be more accurate in next mappings. 
Best regards
A1R15 (2022-02-09 01:52:35+00:00): Если есть какие-то неточности, напишите сюда пожалуйста!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-11 15:24:31+00:00): Please don't tag features incorrectly for rendering purposes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117182296
snopas24 (2022-02-09 02:07:33+00:00): *One Museum Square
FraukeLeo (2022-05-22 07:49:27+00:00): Hallo wermak, die neue Umgehung L 335 verläuft im Bereich der Talbrücke  bis zur weiten Kurve nördlich der Einmündung vollkommen schnurgerade. Du hast den Kreuzungsnode bitte etwas nach Westen geschoben und dadurch einen Knick reingebaut. Ich schieb das mal wieder zurecht :) Wo noch keine Luftbilder sind, bitte GPS-Spuren vom Server heranziehen, ich hab meine Messungen extra hochgeladen.
351293 (2022-11-27 14:42:59+00:00): Hallo wermark,
bei der Korrektur von Wegeverläufen bitte nicht einfach die Bestandsdaten löschen und neu einzeichnen sondern die Wege zurechtrücken. Durch den verlorenen Änderungsverlauf wird es schwierig diesen nachzuvollziehen.
LG
felipeeugenio (2022-02-09 13:03:08+00:00): Hola. Por favor no borrar nodos con place= se pierde todo el historial. Esto es un loteo por lo que veo, por lo que no clasifica como village en lo absoluto. incluso puede que sea un neighbourhood. Te pido por favor aclarar como obtuviste la población. Solo agregamos los datos del INE. Por favor tomar contacto con la comunidad para aclarar este tipo de cosas. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117182665
SomeoneElse_Revert (2026-01-17 13:59:52+00:00): Hello,
The name that you have added here looks like the personal name of someone who lives there. If that is the case, please don't do that - see osm.wiki/Mapping_private_information .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
DD1GJ (2022-02-09 08:44:30+00:00): Hallo mkesko86,

es gibt da leider ein gewaltiges Urheberrechtsproblem, da das Geoportal RLP derzeit nicht für OSM freigegeben ist. Wir können deren Vorgaben bezüglich der Namensnennung nicht erfüllen (Vererbungsproblematik). Könntest Du bitte alle von Dir aus dem Geoportal übernommenen Informationen wieder entfernen?

Vielen Dank, Joachim
mkesko86 (2022-02-09 14:42:20+00:00): Hallo Joachim, danke für Deinen Hinweis. Bist Du sicher, dass die Nutzung dieser Daten nicht möglich ist? Ich hatte vorab die Hinweise auf dieser OpenData-Infoseite gelesen. Da steht ausdrücklich die Erlaubnis für "jede Nutzung", "kommerziell und nicht-kommerziell". https://www.geoportal.rlp.de/mapbender/php/mod_showMetadata.php?languageCode=de&resource=wmc&layout=tabs&id=23815#tabs-4
mkesko86 (2022-02-09 14:48:55+00:00): PS: mit dem Zusatz "zero", nicht "Namensnennung"
mkesko86 (2022-02-09 14:50:19+00:00): Beispiel-Link zur Lizenzseite einer der genutzten Karten: https://www.geoportal.rlp.de/mapbender/php/mod_showMetadata.php?resource=wms&layout=tabs&id=3477&languageCode=de
DD1GJ (2022-02-09 15:08:06+00:00): Das Zero bezieht sich leider nur auf die Bebauungspläne von Puderbach. Bei der "Liegenschaftskarte RP Basisdienst" und  "Karte RP" steht immer noch Namensnennung.

https://www.geoportal.rlp.de/mapbender/php/mod_showMetadata.php?resource=wms&layout=tabs&id=3477&languageCode=de
mkesko86 (2022-02-09 15:36:48+00:00): Ah, jetzt verstehe ich. Auf der Lizenzseite steht "zero", man klickt auf "Karte anzeigen", aber dann öffnet sich ein Karten-Viewer, der auch Karten-Ebenen beinhaltet, die gar nicht unter diese Lizenz fallen. Tut mir Leid, ist mir nicht aufgefallen. Wie blöd. Bitte gib mir etwas (48h?) Zeit, die Namen zu entfernen. Ich hatte heute gerade erst nochmal einen ganzen Schwung ergänzt, bevor ich die Nachricht gesehen habe. Das wird eine Menge unerfreulicher Arbeit :-/
mkesko86 (2022-02-09 16:18:05+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ, erledigt mit Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117209811 - Kaputtmachen ging nun doch um einiges schneller als Eintragen. Danke für den Hinweis. Schade um die Arbeit.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-02-09 20:29:20+00:00): Hi, is there public access through here: https://osm.org/way/43096122 ? Just wanted to check because walkingaccess.govt.nz doesn't suggest that it's public (see  https://maps.walkingaccess.govt.nz/Viewer/?map=b1d1e76a6c754d11b3f3fd9dfce1eb12&extent=1758880.6292%2C5919683.4034%2C1759492.1254%2C5919953.6203%2C2193 )
❤️‍🔥 (2022-02-13 01:56:40+00:00): Hi, since I didn't hear back from you, I've marked the driveway as "access=private" until you or someone else can confirm that it is indeed public. As always, anyone (including youself) is free to edit the access restrictions
user_5359 (2022-02-09 17:48:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
Claredoran (2022-02-17 23:30:51+00:00): This is 13 Bradley rd not 35
ortho_is_hot (2022-02-18 01:05:56+00:00): Hi, the street address has been fixed; it was not edited by this user.
Supaplex030 (2022-02-09 18:56:52+00:00): Ah super, "zone:maxspeed" ist bisher immer an mir vorbeigegangen! Ich dachte immer, das geht nur indirekt über "source:maxspeed" (wo es verschiedene gebräuchliche Angaben für 30er-Zonen gibt) aber so ist es natürlich viel besser. Muss ich mir mal merken!
StefanHRT (2022-02-09 19:02:50+00:00): Ich habe insgesamt 3 verschiedene Versionen gefunden, gebe Dir die auf anderem Wege mal bekannt
Herman Lee (2022-02-09 14:41:06+00:00): 您的这个编辑集和的奥托关系并不是很大，希望您可以将此更改集的描述更准确些，例如：杭州市、更改道路等
Herman Lee (2022-02-09 14:38:41+00:00): 您的这个编辑集和神里绫人的关系并不是很大，希望您可以将此更改集的描述更准确些，例如：杭州市、更改社区等
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-09 15:18:47+00:00): 我觉得再这么写修改集下去，美人鱼就要去禁闭室里报道了吧……
Herman Lee (2022-02-09 14:36:47+00:00): 您的这个编辑集和可莉的关系并不是很大，希望您可以将此更改集的描述更准确些，例如：杭州市等
joeybab3 (2022-03-01 00:37:20+00:00): Could you make sure you are accurately tagging the landuse when making these edits? You retagged some of the farmland as orchards despite the fact that tomatoes are grown there, and you've tagged a lot of chaparral/scrubland around here as a managed forest when there are very few trees present.
hoserab (2022-02-09 17:29:46+00:00): Hello Mosswa,

Thanks for your contributions to the map. Please note that you don't need to—and really shouldn't—use the "name" field to describe things that don't actually have a name. For example, you don't need to tag the putting green on the second hole of the golf course as "Hole 2". We can understand that it's on the second hole because there's a way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1029491215) that shows the (rough) path of the second hole. The green itself has no name. The hole itself doesn't need to be tagged as "Hole 2"; it's already noted as such using the "ref" (as in reference) tag. Again, the hole itself has no name. Very few golf holes in the world do!

For reference please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only.

Thanks again for your contributions! :)
Mosswa (2022-02-09 17:50:56+00:00): It was my first day so I apologize as I learn.  Thanks for updating those back to null for me.  I saw the tags after below so did not realize the name would cause any grief.
hoserab (2022-02-09 20:19:29+00:00): No worries, I can see that these are your first few changes. You'll learn as you go. I just didn't want you to waste your time doing something you don't need(/want) to do, and I didn't want you to feel like I was biting your head off for it either. :)
ovruni (2022-02-09 06:24:35+00:00): Hola Wh0resden, en este conjunto de cambios se movieron las etiquetas del nodos de instituciones educativas vías, sin embargo la ubicación de una de ellas es varias cuadras al norte. Lo mismo sucedió con su edición en el conjunto de cambios 1029500242. Por favor tener en cuenta que muchas de las instituciones en Perú necesitan una corrección de ubicación, ya que fueron agregadas mediante una importación de la base de datos del MINEDU. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú 
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116859300
Herman Lee (2022-02-09 14:48:16+00:00): 这里是德州！
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
AndrewSnow (2022-02-09 06:24:55+00:00): Good to see you tackling my 7 year old note.  Just do be aware of the copyright marked at the bottom of the webpage you have referenced.  Kindly reference this page of the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
CraigPrusansky (2022-02-09 16:52:04+00:00): Honestly, I didn't even see that. I will definitely keep that in mind for future edits.  Thanks for the heads-up.
user_2066394 (2022-02-09 10:52:53+00:00): Der Aldi-Knoten hatte noch wheelchair=*
ivanbranco (2022-03-28 16:35:26+00:00): Hi Saman,

what's the meaning of the "trafficEntrance = yes" tag?
🅢🅐🅜🅐🅝➤ (2022-04-19 07:45:07+00:00): Hi;
That was a mistake in editing and resolved ^_^
TQ 👍🏻
Warin61 (2022-04-23 01:10:11+00:00): Hi,
Why is it necessary to create the landuse=grass? No inner holes in it. 
And then it is a large area .. the OSM wiki for landuse=grass says "A smaller area of grass, usually mown and managed." 
I have combined the ways into one way, tagged the way natural=grassland and landcover=grass and then deleted the relation.
AndrewS (2022-04-23 04:40:51+00:00): Hi, not sure which area you're referring to but I have been sometimes making relations (without holes) where there are a number of close areas that have a geographic connection - the advice on the OSM wiki calls these enclaves and doesn't discourage it. Note sure if that applies to the area you mention.
I was using 'grass' but now realise that has quite a narrow definition. Now using 'grassland' for something approaching a natural landscape or meadow for more agricultural pasture. Any advice for all the areas under power line easements? They are regularly cut back to a grassland state, but are not natural or pasture. Landcover=grass seems to be discouraged by the OSM wiki.