piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2022-01-18 23:32:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Konkon153 (2022-01-18 19:34:16+00:00): [ und damit alle Adressen in der Gemeinde Demen vollständig angepasst ]
abakus_uploader (2022-01-18 23:32:14+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-01-18 23:32:10+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
4004 (2022-01-24 02:02:37+00:00): hi, could you please elaborate why these are not links?
ProfessorLupin (2022-02-09 17:44:05+00:00): Hello, thank you for asking. It's standard practice across OSM to carry road classifications through Y-shaped intersections, rather than tag them as links. These ways are part of the road Н6538, so I used the same road classification.
4004 (2022-02-09 17:53:40+00:00): ah right, will make a note of that, thanks
abakus_uploader (2022-01-18 23:31:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Becky Candy (2022-01-20 07:43:43+00:00): @ Simplissimus199 great mapping ,thank you for mapping, to avoid missing some buildings zoom right in
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116313725
Syl (2022-01-18 19:54:35+00:00): Rebonjour, plutôt que de les supprimer vous pouvez marquer que ces voies sont d'accès privé si c'est clairement le cas. Elles sont utiles par exemple pour les services d'urgence ou de livraison qui utilisent OSM.
Alex425 (2022-01-18 19:58:45+00:00): les maisons ont une clôture et qu'une entrée donc je pense que même les secours ne peuvent pas prendre le mauvais chemin
Syl (2022-01-18 20:04:12+00:00): Je vais restaurer les différents chemins que vous venez de supprimer en rajoutant au passage l'accès privé. Cela permettra d'avoir une trace de cette information et évitera qu'une autre personne retrace ces chemins à partir d'images aériennes.
De façon générale OSM référence ce qui existe, pas forcément uniquement ce qui est accessible publiquement.
Alex425 (2022-01-18 20:10:45+00:00): ok pas de problème
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:26:55+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9429294320/history
Warin61 (2022-01-21 01:30:44+00:00): Error: Multipoygon outer ways cannot shear segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.25041&lat=-33.74862&zoom=17
george1201 (2023-02-03 23:08:15+00:00): Hallo, ich habe eine Frage zu way/1022385972, das "Sparkassenwäldchen", das du mit diesem CS neu eingezeichnet hast. Wo kommt der Name her? Gibt es irgendwo ein Namensschild? Oder wird der Name in irgendwelchen Chroniken erwähnt?
george1201 (2023-07-31 20:52:01+00:00): Ich beantworte meine Frage selbst :-). Es gibt dort tatsächlich ein Schild mit diesem Namen. Somit ok.
cyclingkk (2022-09-26 12:57:41+00:00): Hello, I see you edited some trails at Anne Springs. I've marked several as non-private because my Garmin Watch and other phone software like Komoot sees Private as unroutable and therefore I can't create a route through there with "Hiking" as the activity type. Is there another reason why "Private" is required because I'd rather have it marked as "Path" for hiking.
bxl-forever (2022-01-19 15:15:11+00:00): Hello,

It seems you have uploaded several changes in the last hours, always using the same descriptition title: "CARTO".

This is a map, everything we do here is "carto"-related. :-)

Remember to always describe properly what you changed on the map.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks in advance.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Luzandro (2022-01-23 07:48:05+00:00): Hi,

your turn restriction did quite the opposite of what you wanted and blocked the way straight on. If you specify the restriction as "only_straight_on" and not as "no_u_turn", the "to"-role has to be the only way, where you ALLOWED to drive.

Besides that, I'm a little bit puzzled in which case a router would want to make a u-turn at this location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116315087
-=|MisterY|=- (2022-01-23 08:04:45+00:00): Hi! Thanks a lot for the comments. OsmAnd does this when driving south from Praterstraße and wanting to get back to the same location. Going on Untere Donaustraße, a U-turn is suggested here, to turn south over the bridge (can't turn left from Untere DS here).
Luzandro (2022-01-23 08:23:46+00:00): ah, somehow I missed the no left turn restriction from Untere DS. IMHO it's not a big deal in this case, but as far as I can see, while the left turn is forbidden, it would be allowed to make a u-turn from Schwedenbrücke on this junction. But I guess you can't make this distinction with the current structure.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=48.212313888889014&lng=16.379152777778017&pKey=502130611206724&focus=photo&x=0.48708804010449014&y=0.5817237854261834&zoom=0
-=|MisterY|=- (2022-01-23 10:30:06+00:00): What I'm concerned about is this: https://i.imgur.com/PROsfL1.png
-=|MisterY|=- (2022-01-23 10:36:45+00:00): I added a "no-u-turn" and now it seems ok.
https://i.imgur.com/76LS2Gv.png
-=|MisterY|=- (2022-01-23 10:42:22+00:00): It's a full line all the way.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=18.002058557365068&lat=48.2132680549&lng=16.37950601830005&pKey=201458618244224&focus=photo
Luzandro (2022-01-23 17:24:31+00:00): I had already changed the to-role of the only_straight_on restriction in the morning, which would have the same effect, but as no_u_turn it is probably more obvious what you wanted to achieve anyway
mattmerc (2022-01-18 20:44:50+00:00): Verify via 
https://alcogis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=b4b1dbb65b4943538425bb5ae0f8f62b/
paunofu (2022-03-31 20:06:14+00:00): Bona nit Bocatapan,

Si se ha reabierto el puente convendría quitar el note, no? ¿O sigue en obras?
archpdx (2022-01-18 23:03:41+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for updating this golf course, however in the future, please use meaningful changeset comments: “fix” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. Something simple like "Add golf holes" would be sufficient. You can read more about what makes a good changeset comment here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also, for golf holes you should put the hole number in the dedicated 'Hole Number' field instead of name: name is only used for named holes (eg 'Tea Olive'). You can read more about how golf holes are tagged here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf=hole

I hope you find this feedback useful, happy mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
EP_Repair (2022-02-11 16:25:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117265610 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits, including adding unreal golf courses. User did not respond to changeset comments requesting them to map golf courses properly.
AndreyGeograf (2022-01-18 20:57:34+00:00): + Removed non-existent roads.
puma515 (2022-01-18 21:29:14+00:00): Hello and welcome to openstreetmap please keep your edits local
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Lee Carré (2022-01-21 01:50:32+00:00): ↑(puma515)👍
EP_Repair (2022-02-11 16:25:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117265610 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits, including adding unreal golf courses. User did not respond to changeset comments requesting them to map golf courses properly.
Vinber (2022-01-23 11:09:59+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour votre contribution.

Cependant, le cadre de votre contribution (ours Master 2 Intex UBM 2021_2022 ) amène peu d'informations sur ce que vous avez fait (un lien de référence pour le conteu des changesets https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications).

Ensuite, le name ne sert pas à la description. C'est le nom du pont SI le pont a un nom.

à bientôt
Vinber (2022-01-23 11:13:49+00:00): Retrait du nom (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1022408128)

et comme cela vous a été signalé par l'éditeur, le pont est déconnecté de toute autre voirie, c'est surprenant !

bonne contribution
AntV (2022-01-20 13:17:42+00:00): But from a mapping point of view it's important to document what infrastructure is there but mark it as 'private' rather than delete it all, as it'll only reappear again as other mappers think that it is missing. I noticed that a lot has disappeared as the operational (according to https://www.royalmail.com/services-near-you/postbox/haytor-vale-tq13-9xp/00000TQ725) Royal Mail postbox has been deleted which triggers the following page (https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/progress/TQ/TQ7/#11/50.2755/-3.7804) to mark it as missing which prompts someone to go and have a look. I'd definitely recommend reinstating and marking as private. Certainly with my mapping I'll mark such infrastructure as private and therefore off limits for surveying.
AntV (2022-01-20 14:53:41+00:00): Here are the recommendations from OpenStreetmap regarding this issue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
bxl-forever (2022-01-19 15:27:10+00:00): Hello,

You are editing a forest, but it is already on the map, like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15570071

It is not necessary to create dozens of tree rows within a forest.  We sometime add individual trees but only if it has added-value (e.g. inventory with location and species).

Have a nice day.
user_2066394 (2022-01-18 22:40:53+00:00): Hier hast leisure=sports_centre gelöscht, ein Haupt-Merkmal wäre schon sinnvoll.
joergro (2022-01-19 07:41:04+00:00): Da hast du natürlich recht. War bei der Bearbeitung in OsmAnd verlorgen gegangen. Habe es wieder repariert.
o_andras (2022-01-19 23:26:06+00:00): Thanks!

Just for easier discoverability: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3014827
ivanbranco (2022-08-10 10:50:37+00:00): Hi APneunzehn74,

thanks for you edits, just two notes:
the correct syntax for wikimedia commons is "wikimedia_commons=File:Windrose mit Windnamen.jpg", not "wikimedia_commons		https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b9/Windrose_mit_Windnamen.jpg".

Also please use description:de=* instead of description=* while adding descriptions in german outside Germany

good mapping :)
APneunzehn74 (2022-08-10 14:01:53+00:00): Hi
Thank you, for your info. I changed it.
Greetings and good mapping
Andrew Matheny (2022-01-21 21:31:57+00:00): Hi there-

When tagging points of interest in buildings, you should only use the applicable amenity/shop/etc tag on the point of the business, not on the building. For example, this building should remain "building=retail" since the individual shops are points: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585471178/history#map=19/29.55291/-95.39461

There is an exception when a building has a single occupant, in which case all the other tags like name/brand/etc should also be included in the building without a separate point duplicating the information, e.g. here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543506914/history

thanks,

andrew
AYUMITSU (2022-01-22 06:06:50+00:00): Thank you, I saw smoeone else chopped a building to small strips and thought that was how it suppose to be done, now i know how it works :)
opendcc (2022-01-19 20:34:29+00:00): Hallo,

das paßt soweit mit dem Tor. Ist da ein richtiges Tor? Dann noch barrier=gate ergänzen.
osmviborg (2022-01-19 06:45:02+00:00): Læs planen.
parsd51 (2022-01-19 13:57:22+00:00): Hvorfor det? - det gør du jo :-)

Det vil glæde mig, hvis retorikken kan ændres fra bydemåde til hele sætninger.

Nu er greenfield for mig ikke kun de faktuelle nye bygninger, der er også andet indhold.
Diacritic (2022-01-19 08:58:34+00:00): Hey Michael,

I changed the two driveways you had tagged as highway=track to be highway=service, as this looked to be what you intended. Apologies if I've made an incorrect assumption.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116318331
MichaelCollinson (2022-01-19 21:31:21+00:00): Hi, 
My personal preference is to map clearly unpaved driveways (makes more sense in rural areas and suburban fringe) as tracks but I have absolutely no objection to this change as I am a visitor mapper (living nearby for a few months). Happy mapping!
o_andras (2022-01-19 23:30:13+00:00): Thanks! Just for easier discoverability: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3012295

The name was missing a paren; added with https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3012295
Carto'Cité (2022-07-05 17:38:02+00:00): Bonjour Maxime,
Je me permets de te contacter pour te demander confirmation de la création d'une « vraie » piste cyclable sur ce chemin : 
En effet on voit sur la série de photo (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=279142187002146) qu'il s'agissait d'un simple chemin en 2018. Est-ce qu'il y a eu une construction récente ? À ta disposition pour en discuter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
stwalkerster (2022-09-02 21:04:49+00:00): Are you sure about the IATA code for this? KRT is the IATA code for Khartoum.
Niall_Kerr (2022-09-02 23:31:48+00:00): Agreed, change away.
AntMadeira (2022-01-20 20:58:49+00:00): Olá, cmjs.
Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap!

Neste conjunto de edições, eliminaste o ponto da aldeia de Aveleira, para depois criares um novo, mas com mais informação e noutra posição. Isto nunca deve ser feito, porque elimina o histórico do elemento, que foi criado e editado por outros mapeadores.
O ponto pode ser movido se for caso disso e levar mais informação, mas não precisa de ser eliminado.
Para mais informações, aconselho a leitura desta página:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas

Se tiveres dúvidas e quiseres aprender mais sobre mapear no OSM, serás bem-vindo ao canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa de OpenStreetMap:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
António.
cmjs (2022-01-21 01:19:39+00:00): Olá António, não era minha intenção eliminar e substituir nenhum ponto, apenas acrescentar mais informação. Na verdade, não tenho a certeza a que ponto te referes, porque pensava que não tinha eliminado e substituído nada. Mas vou tentar ser mais cuidadoso! Obrigado pelo conselho.
o_andras (2022-01-19 23:34:13+00:00): Thanks! Just for better discoverability: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3014829
canfe (2022-01-19 18:44:02+00:00): Oggi hai fatto 13 changeset tutti con lo stesso soggetto "corretto/modificato".
E' previsto che la descrizione del CS sia comprensibile e che definisca, al meno un po', cosa davvero si è fatto.
MxxCon (2022-01-19 02:53:29+00:00): Would a gazebo be more appropriate for that building rather than pavilion?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116319174
Nat Bradley (2022-01-19 03:17:03+00:00): I was looking at that, too. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dgazebo Gazebos seem more open to all sides, this is a solid stonwe building which is closed on all sides.
Glassman (2022-01-19 12:03:57+00:00): Some suggestions for improvement - first driveways are by nature private so the access=private tag is not needed. Second, by tagging it residential but leaving the service=driveways is confusing. My guess is the road should be tagged as a highway=service + service=driveway. Being local - just look for a street sign. If the road has a street sign then it's likely a residential street. Lastly addresses are either a node or tagged on a building. They should be tagged on streets. 

Let me know if I've confused what you are trying accomplish. Otherwise can you review and update your edit? 

Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116319588
Glassman (2022-01-19 15:25:08+00:00): FYI - King County does not indicate that this is a residential street. See https://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/iMap/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116319588
DRTBYK (2022-01-19 17:57:55+00:00): Thanks for the review. I knew I was tagging incorrectly but I could not find the incorrect address reference and arbitrary naming of the Driveway that was originally there.  I will revert to the proper tags and see if that fixes things.
BCNorwich (2022-01-19 08:24:05+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Generally, your mapping of the areas is very good, with just a few problems with the tagging.

May I point out OSM guidance on mapping golf courses, please see here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course .  It is pointed out that grass areas are surface=grass, the landuse is not to grow a crop of grass. Bunkers are surface=sand,  the sand is not usually a natural occurrence.

There are a few more problems with paths, duplicated, unjoined and connected to area outlines. There are warnings for this changeset above.

The multipolygon for the course is not needed as it's a single polygon.

I'll try to make a few corrections. If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
lapushkin (2022-01-19 00:36:07+00:00): Я честно не знаю, как прописать government:* бюро, что внутри детской поликлиники. Полный текст таблички:
Министерство труда и социальной защиты Российской Федерации
Федеральное казённое учреждение
«Главное бюро
Медико-социальной экспертизы по г. Москве»
(ФКУ«ГБ МСЭ ПО г. МОСКВЕ» Минтруда России)
Бюро филиал №76
literan (2022-01-19 15:45:46+00:00): да вроде бы все норм, office=government

только добавлю полные названия
lapushkin (2022-01-19 19:54:14+00:00): Отлично, спасибо!
literan (2022-01-19 20:51:21+00:00): кстати, хочу посоветовать отличное приложение для редактирования ОСМ в Android, StreetComplete. Рисовать новое там нельзя, зато можно в квестовой форме добавлять дополнительные теги уже существующим объектам
lapushkin (2022-01-20 08:41:43+00:00): Спасибо! У меня Айфон; я знаю, что можно вносить правки в Organic Maps, но там данные обновляются вместе с обновлением приложения, а значит, могут отставать на месяц. Я уже выработал логику работы: делаю фото и/или видео здания издалека, где видно вывеску плюс фото таблички с часами работы, ответственной организацией и телефонами, а потом вношу через JOSM.
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-01-19 14:49:47+00:00): No such Place
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-01-20 02:52:31+00:00): Still the area of Halifax NS and is only a part of the Halifax Regional Municipality 
The Wikipedia titles are far from reality
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-19 12:05:02+00:00): Hey Victor,

I would suggest using
subject:wikidata

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata#Secondary_Wikidata_links

Is there a reason you used "related" instead?

Regards,

Daniel
VictorIE (2022-01-19 21:31:53+00:00): Good comment.

related:wikidata and related:wikipedia have been used in Ireland, but I suspect a lot of it has been me. Sometimes the entries didn't have named article, e.g. with a memorial to a key person in an organisation, but there is only a wiki article for the organisation, not the person.

If it was me, they would all be wikidata:langauge=* or wikipedia:langauge=* but I'm told "no". :( :)

I will try to come back and revise them all.

Thank you