piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Wegeschlenzer (2022-09-18 19:14:52+00:00): Servus Mike,
danke für den Hinweis und die Korrektur. Hab das mal wo gesehen und dann ungeprüft übernommen...
Wieder was dazu gelernt!
Viele Grüße
Wegeschlenzer
phaerrax (2021-01-03 10:35:07+00:00): Hi zarathoustra! Welcome to OpenStreetMap :-)
Unfortunately, I see two issues in this changeset.
First, you edited at the same time some nodes in Thailand and in France. It is a good practice to keep the changeset more "local", checking your edits so that they are limited to one area. This will help the mapping community keep track of issues in the map, preventing a lot of people (uselessly) getting notified: only those who work on the map close to your edits, instead of everyone between Europe and SE Asia, will see your changeset as relevant.
Second, the name you gave to the beach struck me as suspect: is "Belle plage sans nom" its official name? (You could consult the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name about how to use the "name" tag.)

In any case, happy mapping and thanks for contributing!
P Rocha (2020-12-28 18:33:23+00:00): Obrigado pela dica e peço desculpa pelo desalinhamento, pois estava criar trilhos novos em falta. Vou ter atenção em não usar o Bing e corrigir em função do mapa que me aconselhou. Cumprimentos, Pedro Rocha
messpert (2021-05-21 20:08:12+00:00): This wasn't a correction. The whole area is ridiculous and is very very mixed. Hence mixed tagging. Maybe I should have just deleted it. But I corrected as best I could by calling it mixed.
Did you not read the note?
DaveF (2021-05-22 00:08:04+00:00): If you're so concerned about it, why didn't you create a MP relation?
messpert (2021-05-22 18:01:50+00:00): Because it would be a huge amount of work. This whole thing is total garbage, and I had tried to make some sense of it by tagging it as "mixed", *and* added  a note about the problem. I did not expect someone without local knowledge to come along and revert that change without consulting me or improving the situation, especially someone who I know from various lists as a responsible mapper.

I am very very reluctant to delete substantial work by previous mappers, which is why I did not delete the whole thing. Portions of this vast area are correct, but much of it is completely wrong. I often used to come across this incorrect tagging in local areas, start correctlng it and then discover it was vast and just impossible to correct without sorting out the whole thing which is just infeasible in any reasonable time.

I think that the best thing is to just delete it and then we can start tagging landuse properly and incrementally.

As I say, I am very relunctant to delete previous work as opposed to correct and improve it, but perhaps that is best here. 

I had not thought of converting it to a multipolygon, which might perhaps make it marginally easier to update, but it is still more work than I am prepared to undertake  in any reasonable time.
DaveF (2021-05-22 22:36:16+00:00): If you're not "prepared to undertake" amendments to improve the quality of the OSM database then you shouldn't employ changes which make it worse. 
No one has to "consult" you. You don't own this area.
messpert (2021-05-23 11:51:34+00:00): This is the kettle calling the pot black. It is you that have made it worse. I improved the database better by changing the tag to "mixed" which reflects reality far better than residential. You simply ignored that with  no local knowledge or consultation.
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:49:59+00:00): Wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96626130
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:48:51+00:00): Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96626115
K_Sakanoshita (2021-02-18 23:52:24+00:00): 熊本城の敷地に building=yes が付いていたので修正しておきますね。
eggie (2020-12-28 19:00:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat levert nog al eens schade op door onbedoelde  verplaatsingen van objecten. Houd het gebied van je edits kleiner svp

MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:43:59+00:00): Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96625929
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:43:05+00:00): Wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96625886
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:42:20+00:00): Wycofałem w  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96625836
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:41:25+00:00): Wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96625804
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-13 07:32:32+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3264955 ?
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:40:18+00:00): Wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96625779
maraf24 (2020-12-29 20:53:08+00:00): //Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96588221
Shaun das Schaf (2020-12-28 21:50:27+00:00): Hallo Joerg,

was willst du uns mit den Koordinaten im "fixme"- und "description"-Tag mitteilen?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Joerg Buechner (2020-12-29 17:52:35+00:00): Hallo, habe lange nicht mehr für OSM gearbeitet, keine externe Software und Potlatch funktioniert auch nicht, deshalb via blieb nur iD übrig. Wie ich dort die exakte Position setzen kann, war mir unklar und hatte ich nur meinen GPS-Track ohne Wegpunkte reinladen können und musste mich daran orientieren. Kann man den Wegpunkt auf die exakten Koords positionieren?
Shaun das Schaf (2020-12-29 19:49:08+00:00): Mit JOSM ist das möglich. Ich habe die Höhle jetzt mal auf die von dir angegebenen Koordinaten verschoben.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
user_5359 (2020-12-30 18:10:28+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/relation/10606658: A restriction relation must have three roles (from (one way) to (one way), via (usually one node, but can also be different ways).
user_5359 (2020-12-30 18:11:06+00:00): see also https://www.osm.org/relation/10606659
pio2_122 (2020-12-28 19:38:00+00:00): Dlaczego drugi raz dodałeś biuro ZBiLK-u, gdy sam oznaczyłeś je już wcześniej (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6662465631)?
JulesGabrielVerne (2020-12-28 19:45:35+00:00): bo w obu tych miejscach siedzibę ma ZBiLK. Niestety w tym "starym" niema podanego departamentu więc oznaczone jest ogólnikowo jako ZBiLK
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:39:09+00:00): //Wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96625740
muchichka_s (2020-12-29 10:12:55+00:00): Дякую,що додали теґ будівлі. Будь ласка не стирайте amenity=school, його зазвичай вішають на територію, але коли вона не позначена, то на саму будівлю разом із building=school. Це основний теґ, який визначає школу. Одна школа - одне amenity=school.
P.S. я вже тут його повернув
ZeLonewolf (2020-12-29 03:26:23+00:00): 172 / 5000
Translation results
¿Sabe que eliminó todo el límite, excepto un segmento pequeño? ¿Que estás tratando de hacer? ¿Está eliminando intencionalmente el límite de Metropolitana?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6066126
Orozcu (2020-12-29 14:17:25+00:00): Es que el limite no existe, por eso lo estoy borrando, estoy tratando de actualizar el mapa, no lo entiende?
Jakka (2020-12-29 10:09:46+00:00): Are you 100% certain it is not a vincenal path https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Slowroads
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-19 14:51:24+00:00): Hello! Have you meant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfurniture for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8267922559/history ?
opendcc (2020-12-28 20:31:14+00:00): Hallo,

wenn Motorfahrzeuge nicht erlaubt sind, dann motor_vehicle=no. Acess=no ist alles nicht erlaubt, auch Fußgänger nicht.

Servus
Brandlingo (2020-12-29 09:27:15+00:00): Merci für den Hinweis und fürs gerade biegen. Servus
maraf24 (2020-12-29 20:55:07+00:00): //Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96587128
maraf24 (2020-12-29 20:56:33+00:00): //Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96586273
Anton Khorev (2020-12-29 11:11:08+00:00): Hello. Have you considered splitting the polygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160892985 into two landuses: one for landfill and the other for warehouses and everything else?

(as opposed to having just one smaller landuse inside like in this changeset:  
https://osmcha.org/changesets/96549484/ )
Szymson (2020-12-30 17:28:29+00:00): Hello, this all thing is very suspicious. The other user that has been online last time 3 years ago suddenly came back to editing in OSM and the only thing he does is destroying something that has been established 8 years ago by reverting changeset to the state that is inproper (to make it clear: dividing landfill to 2 parts is inproper). As an argument i bring here link to official land plan for this area made by the Court of City of Gdańsk: https://www.gdansk.pl/zagospodarowanie-przestrzenne/plany,2307 where this whole area is mentioned as landfill. As it comes to name of this area: Polish "Zakład Utylizacyjny" is simply a "landfill" or "waste disposal" in English. There are dozens of landfills in Poland. Zakład Utylizacyjny Sp. z o.o. w Gdańsku clearly shows which landfill is it, as it is essential in terms of navigation apps and so on that is based on OSM database.
I hope that I made everything clear and I'm looking forward to end this nonesence editing war.
Anton Khorev (2020-12-31 13:40:29+00:00): "The landfill is exactly here because official plan says so" is not the strongest argument you can make because we map what's on the ground 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability  

Your opponents may say that this place is obviously not a landfill because they see a parking here and that the actual landfill is to the south of it
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=54.32216&mlon=18.54161#map=19/54.32215/18.54161

Let's suppose you want to map landuses like they are on the official plan. You map the area "006 - 53" as landuse=landfill. But there are other areas like "... - 41" that don't directly correspond to current landuse polygons. Should they be changed too?

You say that dividing the landfill is improper, but that's not the argument your opponents make. They say that the actual landfill covers smaller area (see this changeset comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93858538 ) I mentioned splitting the area because they don't tag "not a landfill". Tagging it as landuse=industrial is another option.

You can find examples of waste disposal facilities mapped in various ways: as one landuse=landfill  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31665129#map=16/52.4241/10.0146

as landuse=landfill for actual landfill with landuse=industrial for warehouses, sorting facilities and so on  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28457754#map=15/40.2626/-3.6318

as landuse=landfill inside landuse=industrial  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365073284#map=16/52.3543/20.9609

The name(s) of the area(s) is a separate argument.
user_5359 (2020-12-29 06:40:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see https://www.osm.org/way/755213195? Is the street name correct?
alesarrett (2020-12-29 06:48:26+00:00): Ciao Freiheit28, ho visto che hai aggiunto alcuni stalli per disabili. I dati li hai estratti da qualche immagine o rilevati a terra? Perché ad es. questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8267964363   a mia conoscenza non è lì dove l'hai messo, ma è invece questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7830477811 all'ingresso del parco giochi.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96556338
Freiheit28 (2020-12-29 13:58:17+00:00): Ciao Alesarett; in effetti mi fai sorgere un dubbio; sicuramente fino l'anno scorso lo stallo x invalidi era esattamente dove l'ho segnato; se non ricordo male poi li ci hanno piazzato qualche bidone della spazzatura e lo stallo è stato spostato in fondo al parcheggio (lato ovest).. sono andato un po' a memoria... Comunque quando avrò occasione di passare mi accerterò. Grazie :)
alesarrett (2021-01-04 05:00:25+00:00): Ho già cancellato io lo stallo. A luglio 2019 era già così; ora è vicino all'ingresso del parco, vedi https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/UTOw3Tqn_9ZmEaUkPyCVlg
maraf24 (2020-12-29 20:55:34+00:00): //Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96586944
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:32:25+00:00): //Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8268002159
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:32:06+00:00): //Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8268012549
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:31:52+00:00): //https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8268024618
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:31:36+00:00): //Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8268036729
maraf24 (2020-12-29 21:31:19+00:00): //Wycofane w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96560508
user_5359 (2020-12-28 20:30:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/813477941/history: What is the meaning of the tag roof:shape=1 ?
Wynndale (2020-12-28 21:28:51+00:00): It means nothing. I typed carelessly when I originally added the way.
Shaun das Schaf (2020-12-28 21:54:55+00:00): Hallo Brandlingo,

die Adresse sollte nur am Haupthaus eingetragen werden. Sonst taucht die Adresse in der Suche mehrmals auf.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Brandlingo (2020-12-29 09:36:58+00:00): Danke, hab es gleich auch für Hausnummern 1 - 6 korrigiert
whb (2021-06-16 11:43:29+00:00): Guten Tag,

Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta ist hier sehr viel lagegenauer als Esri World Imagery (entspricht hier derzeit meist Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)).
Also bitte nicht versehentlich die Genauigkeit verschlechtern, wie hier geschehen.

Viele Grüße
whb
eggie (2020-12-28 20:39:18+00:00): Oke.. Dit is al beter. Met access=yes kun je overigens ook problemen krijgen in de routering omdat het andere =no  tags overruled. Dus gewoon verwijderen die regel access=yes.
Ik denk dat het tussenstukje waar je naar de Swammerdamlaan rijdt vanaf de Wiltinksbrug een highway=cycleway is zolas het bord aan het begin aangeeft,
(fietspad) 
Het is wellicht onderdeel van de slinger Wiltinksbrug-Swammerdamlaan.
De rest zal best highway=path zijn. 
eggie
eggie (2020-12-28 22:00:28+00:00): Hier eindigde je pad waar je mag fietsen op een wandelpad waar je plots  niet mocht fietsen. De aansluitng met het fietspad Oostelijke rondweg. Ik heb dat kleine stukje ook als path getagd.
ualios (2021-01-02 21:48:08+00:00): Ciao, il ristorante monticelli da tempo si è trasferito qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2672544478
eggie (2020-12-28 20:42:22+00:00): Volgens het bord dat er ooit stond en wellicht nog steeds staat is dit een onverplicht fietspad G13  Daar staat zo'n rechthoekig bord G13 Is dat verwijderd?
Nu zijn je tags traffic_sign =NL:G13  , maar opeens weer highway=path. Dat zou dus =cycleway moeten zijn. 
De voorgaande mapper was ikzelf.
eggie (2020-12-28 20:45:13+00:00): Leesvoer tagging fietspaden
G11: 
mofa=yes
moped=no
traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: 
moped=designated
mofa=designated 
traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: 
moped=no
mofa=no
traffic_sign=NL:G13

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
eggie (2020-12-28 20:47:30+00:00): Van het westelijke bruggetje heb ik nog even access=no verwijderd
eggie (2020-12-28 21:02:06+00:00): Tip Tag gewoon steeds de borden
Staat er een bord fietspad
dan highway=cycleway (rendert blauw)
staat er een G7 bord dan highway=footway
staat er niets highway =path
marczoutendijk (2020-12-28 20:28:44+00:00): source=PDOK
Mike Baggaley (2021-01-01 18:45:58+00:00): Hi, I see you updated the highway types for Ludgershall Road and Windmill Drive, but have not changed the refs. Can you please review these as they do not match the highway types?

Thanks,
Mike
zuicz (2021-04-20 12:03:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2630415
dzamper (2021-04-20 17:37:33+00:00): Dziękuję za informację
eggie (2020-12-28 22:04:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-12-28 22:17:01+00:00): Wellicht een overkapping? building=roof
gr eggie
Koektrommel (2020-12-29 15:37:28+00:00): Hallo Eggie, het gebouw dat aangegeven stond is een aantal jaren geleden gesloopt. Het gebouw wat niet aangegeven stond, maar wat ik heb toegevoegd is van origine een hoorberg, maar doet nu dienst als opslag en is voorzien van wanden (gesloten gebouw)
eggie (2020-12-29 16:25:10+00:00): Dan is het correct getagd.. Overkappingen  en van die half openschuren. koeienstallen  staan nooit in de BAG (Kadaster) .. vandaar mijn opmerking. 
We voegen ze dan zelf toe. 
gr eggie
eggie (2020-12-28 22:07:19+00:00): Beste Koektrommel.. access=no is bijna altijd fout. Het is een verbiedsverbos voor iedereen.
Moet het niet motor_vehicle =no zijn?
Je zult ook aan de rendering zien dat je de track bijna niet ziet op de kaart.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-28 22:09:12+00:00): Hier mag kennelijk niemand komen, maar het is vast openbare weg.
Dus access=no klopt niet. Welk bord staat hier vooraan. 
De voorgaande mapper heeft veel ervaring in tagging van wegen. 
Waarom access=no?
eggie
eggie (2020-12-28 22:24:35+00:00): Wanneer iets met wielen er niet mag komen tag je vehicle=no  en dan haal je access=no weg.. Kijk je nog even?
Dan zal de rendering weer terugkomen. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96558886
MVG
eggie
eggie (2020-12-28 22:10:34+00:00): access=no betekent Verboden toegang in dit gebied. Is dat het geval?
De routering is nu zoek
Is het wellicht motor_vehicle=no?
gr eggie
eggie (2020-12-28 22:30:44+00:00): Of beter vehicle=no  Dan worden fietsers ook geweerd?
eggie (2020-12-28 22:11:34+00:00): access=no is in bijna alle gevallen fout.
Welk bord staat vooraan?
Je mag er toch wandelen.
eggie
eggie (2020-12-28 22:47:19+00:00): access = no icm met foot = yes horse=designated  wordt ontmoedigd. Het geeft problemen.
Ik heb het veranderd in vehicle=no
Dat houdt alles met wielen tegen. 
Laat maar weten of het klopt
MVG,
eggie
user_5359 (2020-12-30 18:08:54+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8268190242: What ist the meaning of the key Number?
Jožo Schwarz (2020-12-29 22:55:30+00:00): Ahoj, všimol som si, že si včera v tomto changesete odstránil cestu, ktorá spájala studničku Nad kameňolomom a Päťbojársky chodník o sto metrov vyššie. Pred asi mesiacom som po tej ceste išiel a hoci je o niečo horšie viditeľná, stále tam je. Okrem iného na ňu naviguje aj tabuľa https://www.freemap.sk/?map=18/48.196030/17.103648&layers=XIe&image=275537
Navrhujem preto vrátenie tejto cesty do mapy :) Daj vedieť, či to vieš spraviť, alebo mám ja. Ďakujem.
mbambus (2021-01-02 11:14:51+00:00): Ahoj, vdaka za informaciu :) Zmenu som robil na zaklade svojej prechadzky, z opacnej strany (od patbojarskeho chodika) som tu cestu nenasiel, az zhruba pri studnicke som bol schopny ju identifikovat... Kazdopadne mozno som sa zle pozeral, resp z opacnej strany moze byt viditelnejsia... Definitivne, ak na nu ukazuje tabulka, dava zmysel to vratit naspat. Vedel by sa ma, prosim, odnavigovat na nejaky rozumny sposob ako to spravit? Zatial som sa docital, ze nejako automaticky sa to cez iD neda, napada ma len rucne tu cesticku opat predlzit (akurat ze si nepamatam presne kde sa pripajala).... Este raz vdaka :) a prepac za pridanu robotu....
BCNorwich (2020-12-29 09:59:37+00:00): Hi the numbers on the public footpaths are actually council reference numbers so the tag is ref=1234 rather than name=1234.  I've changed these three.

Regards Bernard.
PiersG (2020-12-29 10:38:53+00:00): Great, thanks.
kuhni74 (2023-11-21 10:41:27+00:00): wo kommt der zusätzliche "Rüssel" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8268200249 beim Wasserfall her? Scheint ja mehr ein Gipfel oder Rücken zu sein, und der ist schon weiter nördlich gemappt gemäß basemap
PacerCZ (2023-11-21 18:28:42+00:00): Servus, ja stimmt, es war falsch (ich habe es schon korrigiert). In aller Kürze, in einer Karte habe ich den Name im Bereich des Grabens gefunden und habe gedacht, dass sein Name ist. Es war aber eindeutig falsch, höchst wahrscheinlich heißt so der ganze Kamm (und auf der Karte war die Inschrift nur weg von den Wegen auf dem Kamm auf die Seite verschoben). So habe ich jetzt auch den Kamm angezeichnet, auch wenn in OSM ein Gipfel in dem Kamm mit diesem Name ist. Vielleicht ist es also die Bezeichnung von Beiden. Nur, es würde mich dann interessieren, wie der Graben eigentlich heißt :-(.
kuhni74 (2023-11-21 20:05:10+00:00): Danke! Wie das relativ unbedeutende Graberl heißt, weiß ich nicht, ich hab auch auf arcanum keinen Namen gefunden. Der Rücken namens Rüssel hieß übrigens in der FJLA Ochsenbodenriegel nach den nördlich gelegenen Weiden.
PacerCZ (2023-11-21 20:26:38+00:00): hm, und dann sollte man was kartieren können..
Das Graberl ist kurz, aber sicher wunderschön. Ich bin heuer den Jodelgraben durchgegangen und für nächstes Jahr habe ich den Anderen vor. Laut Lidar Aufnahme können dort mehrere schönen Wasserfälle sein.. Sogar noch mehr als in Jodelgraben.
kuhni74 (2023-11-21 21:44:45+00:00): schön ist es sicher, aber nicht alles Schöne hat und braucht einen Namen
SomeoneElse (2021-01-09 22:14:25+00:00): Hello,
You've added a fixme here, but it should be possible to ask the original mapper - they're still very active in OSM.
Best Regards,
Andy
ti-lo (2021-01-12 18:38:03+00:00): Sometimes I did so. But some don't remember anymore (as it was on holidays), some have left the region, some don't care etc. So a "fixme" is "to whom it may concern and is interested in this region"
user_5359 (2020-12-30 18:03:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
eggie (2020-12-28 22:52:24+00:00): Beste Fabrizio.. Je verandert import BAG adressen en sleept ze ergens anders heen. Waar zijn nu dan de oude adressen. Die horen toch intact te blijven?
Andere adresnodes zullen nu 2x voorkomen
De comb inatie access=no en foot-yes is bijna altijd fout. Beter geen access=no gebruiken.
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96561404

Kijk nog eens goed of je iets kunt herstellen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-28 22:54:26+00:00): Please don't changes the official addressnode. Just migrate the info.
Please fix the damage. 
Your edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96561404 
Don't use the combination access=no foot=yes It's not correct.
Greetz,
eggie
fabzzap (2020-12-29 09:36:45+00:00): Can you please explain what is the damage? I can understand that, when a shop moves, there are 2 alternatives:
1. create a new node at the new address
2. move the old node
and, in case of Wagenmakers and Tel (now Tel Krop), I chose the second. But I took care of changing the address field as well, not just the position of the node.
eggie (2020-12-29 09:56:56+00:00): Hi Fabrizio,

The problem is all addressnodes are import from the Dutch Kadaster.
So the addressnodes are official.
If a shop is moving to an other place the old address is still in use. So we prefer to copy only the shop info to a new present BAG (Kadaster)  addressnode.
So there is no need to create a new addressnode. They are already present.
In case changing an addressnode will result in doubleling the address and the old addresnode is vanished.

Reposition an existing addressnode to the right spot is ofcourse no problem.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-29 10:04:06+00:00): Here is a problem for instance  :
addr:city	Amsterdam	Amsterdam
addr:housenumber	20	731
addr:postcode	1082LA	1082LJ
addr:street	Gelderlandplein	Arent Janszoon Ernststraat
name	Sietze Wagenmakers	Sietze Wagenmakers
shop	jewelry	jewelry
source	BAG	BAG
source:date	2014-03-24	2014-03-24
The old address nr 20 has gone now.
I see not every addressnode was a BAG (Kadaster) addressnode.
nr 731 is duplicated I think.
eggie (2020-12-29 10:07:14+00:00): Restored gelderlandplein 20
eggie (2020-12-29 10:12:42+00:00): merged info Sietze Wagenmakers with present BAG addressnode nr 731 Arent Janszoon Ernststraat

Otherwise you got two identical addressnodes.
You see?
eggie
eggie (2020-12-29 10:14:09+00:00): ... and so on.. up to you.
Your edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96561404
If the old addressnode is not from the BAG ther is no problem. The empty  BAG addressnode is still present. 
gr eggie