piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-09-19 12:39:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Most buildings are strict rectangular. Can be mapped with 4 nodes.
Please square each building with the Q key when it is selected.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122925526
Frans S (2022-09-19 12:39:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Most buildings are strict rectangular. Can be mapped with 4 nodes.
Please square each building with the Q key when it is selected.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122925526
Frans S (2022-09-19 12:40:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

* Buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122925526
Frans S (2022-09-19 12:42:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

* Buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122925526
sorcrosc (2022-06-27 20:23:01+00:00): Ciao. Mi sembra che hai eliminato gli addr:housenumber invece. Se sicuro di questo?
canfe (2022-06-28 04:51:06+00:00): Se addr:housenumber non ha un valore non va messo snc ma tolta la chiave e sostituita con la coppia nohousenumer=yes.
Questo CS è la correzione di una correzione, ma ora dovrebbe essere a posto.
Tu però controlla in base alla mia spiegazione e alla wiki citata.
ivanbranco (2022-06-28 18:15:40+00:00): Sembra che con questo changeset hai tolto il tag addr:housenumber a elementi che avevano sia addr:housenumber che nohousenumber.

Ad esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7446509109

questo nodo aveva sia addr:housenumber=5 che nohousenumber=yes 
Con questo changeset hai eliminato addr:housenumber=5 mantenendo solamente nohousenumber=yes.
sorcrosc (2022-06-28 19:46:00+00:00): Sì infatti gli addr:housenumber avevano un numero e non "snc" come valore. Non è chiaro, canfe, perché hai deciso di eliminare questo tag in favore di nohousenumber=yes
MarcoR (2022-06-29 08:38:29+00:00): Segnalo che anche per i due nodi di Livorno sono stati rimossi i civici mentre i numeri erano presenti sulle mattonelline. In un caso (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8954302870/history) era presente nohousenumber=yes probabilmente per errore di copia-incolla (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=296826571924590); nel secondo caso (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7618361786/history) l'unico nohousenumber=yes che vedo in zona è della scuola ma quello viene dai dati del Ministero dell'istruzione (https://cercalatuascuola.istruzione.it/cercalatuascuola/ricerca/risultati?rapida=LIEE81402V&tipoRicerca=RAPIDA&gidf=1); sul cancello il numero 12 era presente quando passai di lì.
canfe (2022-06-29 16:08:29+00:00): Scusate la svista ho ripristinato i civici.
gscscnd (2022-09-01 12:45:44+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60217133> od Do Siedmiu Dębów na wschód to jednak bardziej surface=ground.
irik (2022-09-01 13:08:35+00:00): Okej.
gscscnd (2022-09-13 17:51:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126145685
irik (2022-09-13 18:27:47+00:00): Okej.
user_8101879 (2022-07-03 12:45:56+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14301943 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards
skorpion62 (2022-07-04 18:26:20+00:00): Hallo Fred73000,
ich kann leider die Relation 14301943 nicht finden, um sie zu bearbeiten oder zu löschen. In der Bearbeitung von Relationen bin ich noch nicht so geübt. Es war ein versehen, dass ich die leere Relation hochgeladen habe. Da ich die Relation in JOSM nicht finden kann, bitte ich Dich sie für mich zu löschen.
Vielen Dank.
Viele Grüße skorpion62
highflyer74 (2022-07-04 18:45:41+00:00): Moin skorpion62!

Wenn Du hier im Änderungssatz guckst, kannst Du sie sehen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14301943). Ich habe sie jetzt gelöscht.

Schönen Abend!

@fred73000: the empty relation has been deleted. Thank you!
skorpion62 (2022-07-04 20:42:50+00:00): Moin  highflyer74,
vielen Dank für`s löschen.
Viele Grüße skorpion62
user_8101879 (2022-07-15 15:06:52+00:00): Danke euch beiden
Fred73000
user_8101879 (2022-07-03 12:42:56+00:00): Hi,

the relations 14226912, 14226914, 14226915 and 14226916 are empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created these useless relations despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards
XName (2022-07-03 20:07:11+00:00): I did not create them in particular. I believe some of them appear after splitting or joining ways. I am trying to learne better about OSM. Feel free to give more infor for how to fix them or to delete them...
XName (2022-07-03 20:10:04+00:00): I will be more carefully on next changes, to identify errors
klnkengi (2022-06-27 19:47:03+00:00): Ich meinte Lobetal - Ladeburg
mueschel (2022-06-29 11:25:11+00:00): Hi,
I'd like to suggest not to use individual tags for e.g. van:brand and jeep:brand. 

I would use  either 'wreck:brand' for all of them, or even don't use any prefix at all.
If the object is a wreck, it's quite clear that a brand or colour tag describe this wreck and nothing else.
demon_box (2022-06-29 12:23:34+00:00): Hi Mueschel,
ok for the great suggestion, you are completely right, I make the appropriate corrections immediately, good mapping ;-)
thank you
--enrico
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-30 20:17:11+00:00): re https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2251490

This error was misleading, see https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8885

What was meant here is that this gate node should be part of the way, not a floating node

I fixed it
Becky Candy (2022-06-30 08:26:42+00:00): To ensure buildings/highways do not cross or connect, zoom right in and carefully place the building corners. If a road overlaps a building you should feel free to adjust the position of the road before mapping the building. Thank you for mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122926436
emersonveenstra (2022-06-27 20:12:18+00:00): Hi,

`highway=footway` implies `motor_vehicle=no`, so there's no need to explicitly tag it as such. Would you mind removing it please?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122926469
ZLima12 (2022-10-21 03:47:50+00:00): Hi,

Why did you do this?
user_8101879 (2022-07-03 12:40:39+00:00): Hi,

the relations 10704288, 10704289 and 10704290 are empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created these useless relations despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards
Glassman (2022-07-03 15:50:23+00:00): Sorry about that - I must have overlooked the validation message. The relations should be gone now.

To fix in JOSM, just use the File->Download object to download the relation. Then delete the empty relation and upload. 

I'll try to be more vigilant in the future.
Carnildo (2022-06-28 00:46:09+00:00): The school name was already mapped on the school grounds.  Unless the building has a different name than the school as a whole, there's no need to repeat it.
Arnaud Champollion (2022-06-29 06:37:15+00:00): Peut-être plutôt sur Open Historical Map pour la voie ferrée au fond du lac ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Open_Historical_Map
literan (2022-06-28 17:39:06+00:00): правильно "улица Николая Озерова", 

слово "улица" вы забыли
literan (2022-06-28 18:08:45+00:00): but you broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9960278

I will fix it
RVR015 (2022-07-05 18:46:15+00:00): Thank you for the update. Greatly appreciated!
os-emmer (2024-08-30 10:31:07+00:00): Hallo Geo-Tobi,
es gibt/gab hier anscheinend Bauarbeiten am Schwimmbad. Ist das Wellenbad immer noch im Bau? Tragen die Becken hier wirklich die angegeben Namen oder sind das nicht eher Beschreibungen?
Geo-Tobi (2024-08-30 10:46:37+00:00): Grüß dich, ich bin nicht aus der Ecke und war da nur einmal, vor wenigen Jahren. Damals war das Wellenbecken geschlossen, wasserleer, mit Bauzaun. 
Bzgl. Namen: ja, definitiv, das gehört in die Description, da hast du Recht.
os-emmer (2024-08-30 10:53:11+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die Rückmeldung. Ich habe das ganze jetzt mal etwas angepasst, mit fixme=* an der möglicherweise nicht mehr vorhandenen baustelle.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155967633
Geo-Tobi (2024-08-31 18:12:17+00:00): Oh, gerade gesehen: das ganze Bad ist dauerhaft geschlossen, wie schade:
https://www.waldkraiburg.de/stadt-verwaltung/wirtschaft-stadtentwicklung/projekte/freibad-waldkraiburg
os-emmer (2024-08-31 19:26:50+00:00): Ok, danke für die Recherche. Ich habe das jetzt aktuallisiert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156029339
Muss jetzt noch an alle Schwimmbecken und Spielfelder auf dem Gelände ein access=no? Ich bin mir unsicher.
Geo-Tobi (2024-08-31 23:22:26+00:00): Ui, du hast gleich den gesamten Schwimmbad POI entfernt. Das hätte ich vermutlich nicht gemacht. Hab im Wiki mal gelesen, man solle ein disused vor den POI kleben, damit die Tags erstmal erhalten bleiben. Also vor amenity oder leisure oder was auch immer. Wir wissen ja nicht ob es irgendwann wieder eröffnet wird.
Selbiges kann man auch bei den Schwimmbecken machen. Lies' bitte nochmal kurz nach, bei Key:disused.  Danke
Geo-Tobi (2024-08-31 23:31:25+00:00): Vergleiche: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122927506
os-emmer (2024-09-01 09:15:19+00:00): Ich habe die Tags nicht entfern. Ich habe statt des disused:*=* ein was:*=* davor gesetzt, siehe hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70526467
Das ist im Grunde ein Synonym für disused:*=*, siehe hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix#Repurpose
Wenn dir disused:*=* lieber ist, fühle dich frei, das zu ändern.

Bei den Schwimmbecken (und Spielfeldern) halte ich das für falsch. Sie existieren ja noch, nur lässt einen da niemand mehr hin. Im wiki gibt es das Beispiel disused:leisure=pitch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:*
Da steht als Erläuterung "Disused pitch, now somewhat overgrown."
Nach meinem derzeitigen Verstöndnis sind die Einrichtungen im Schwimmbad ja nicht verfallen oder zugewuchert. Oder sehe ich das falsch?
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-01 11:17:38+00:00): Stimmt, das hatte ich bei meiner Datenabfrage fehlinterpretiert. Entschuldige. Alles bestens. Danke für die Richtigstellung.
MxxCon (2022-06-28 04:27:28+00:00): Hello.
Do you have any supporting information that this building is already complete? It is presently not visible on any available satellite imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122927660
VanessaScanfeld (2022-06-28 09:52:14+00:00): Yes, here is a link to CBS News touring the new building https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/newyork/news/harlem-academy-expands-enrollment-with-help-of-new-building/, and an article in YIMBY talking about contruction compelting at the new address: https://newyorkyimby.com/2021/12/new-harlem-academy-building-opens-at-655-st-nicholas-avenue-in-hamilton-heights-manhattan.html. This is a list of articles the school has chronicling the construction: https://www.harlemacademy.org/blog/tags/permanent-campus. And the new address is also used on the school's website: www.harlemacademy.org (see the footer of the page). Pls let me know if additional proof is needed. Thank you!
Vinber-Pro (2022-06-28 17:04:33+00:00): Bonjour,
attention à la taille de certains de vos changesets, cela déborde beaucoup :)
Je me permets le français aue de a localisation usuelle de vos contributions !
Bonne cartographie
jcr83 (2022-06-28 17:18:14+00:00): Bonjour Vincent,
Oui, en effet, mon changement ne concernant que la France, je n'ai pas pensé à l'étendue que provoquerait la Guyane.
Vinber-Pro (2022-07-05 15:32:15+00:00): bonjour,
yep, j'ai souvenir d'un joli changeset aussi comme cela que j'ai eu le plaisir de voir traverser le monde, je crois que pour ma part c'était les terrains de pétanques de la réunion qui m'avaient "eu" ...
Bonne carto
A67-A67 (2022-06-29 05:17:15+00:00): This had already been mapped correctly with the tag cyclestreet=yes.

It's a cyclestreet (fietsstraat), not a cycleway (fietspad). This is indicated by adding the tag cyclestreet=yes to the road, not by changing the road type. 

See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cyclestreet
jaapsen (2022-07-04 17:05:30+00:00): Thank you for the information.
philippec (2022-06-28 07:18:29+00:00): Bezoekerscentrum Webbekom AED
Proficiat, dit is nr 1500
DD1GJ (2022-06-27 21:47:09+00:00): Hallo Helmuth,

willkommen bei OSM und danke fürs mitmachen. Ein Fahrradverbot wird nur eingetragen, wenn es vor Ort ausgeschildert ist, bzw. wenn es sich um einen Pfad im Wald handelt der schmaler als 2 Meter ist.

Viele Grüßem Joachim

PS: einige MTB-Freaks gehen dann auf die Barrikaden: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75711  ;-)
Helmuth D (2022-06-28 06:35:14+00:00): Hallo Joachim,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe es wieder geändert. Ich möchte nur verhindern, dass Navigationsgeräte nicht alle Fahrradtypen über diese Strecke Navigieren. Ich besitze nämlich ein Trekkingbike das von der Bereifung her einem Gravelbike entspricht und meines Erachtens ist dieser Weg dafür nicht geeignet. Leider kann man nicht die genauen Fahrradtypen angeben für welche der Weg geeignet ist. Ich hoffe meine jetzige Änderung ist besser. Aber ich bin für Verbesserungsvorschlägen offen.

Viele liebe Grüße Helmuth
Pol Dellaiera (2022-06-30 17:41:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avez vous supprime ces informations?
Il s'agit bien de boulevard de la fleur de lys.
Merci
eMerzh (2022-06-30 19:40:30+00:00): Hello Pol, 

En effet, il s'agit toujours bien du boulevard de la fleur de lys.
Par contre, si on regarde la version avant ma modification (la 19) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8415586/history
la rue possède un numéro de maison, ce qui n'a pas beaucoup de sens pour une rue.

Voilà :) 

Bonne journée

Brice
Pol Dellaiera (2022-06-30 19:44:07+00:00): Merci je comprends !
Phuntsho Dorji (2022-07-15 03:52:20+00:00): Hi Sir, We are also doing OSM work in Thimphu City, 
lets connect sometime to share our experience.
Its amazing you are working in Bhutan
seichter (2022-07-15 20:30:49+00:00): I'm usually not mapping in cities since that needs typically local knowledge.
I will only comment on some change sets in Thimphiu regarding unusual mapping.
Phuntsho Dorji (2022-07-16 03:49:26+00:00): Thank you for a reply.
I will follow that
misterte (2022-06-28 14:39:37+00:00): Hallo,

welche Quelle hast Du für die Adressergänzungen genutzt ?

VG
silversurfer83 (2022-06-28 07:38:57+00:00): Moin,
wenn die Büroräume an sich noch vorhanden sind und weiter genutzt werden können wäre es angebrachter hier die lifecycle prefixes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix) zu nutzen um die Geschichte des Nodes zu erhalten. Ist besser als löschen :)
Grüße
silversurfer83
dsk1 (2022-06-30 23:22:49+00:00): Hallo, keine schlechte Idee. Allerdings gebe ich in diesem konkreten Fall zu bedenken, dass es sich hier eigentlich um ein Wohnhaus handelt. Ich war auf der Suche nach einem Geldautomaten und bin einfach vorbeigelaufen. Nach einer Überprüfung in Osmand  habe ich das Haus dann identifiziert und festgestellt, dass die Sparkasse nicht mehr existiert. Ich weiß leider nicht wie man hier ein Foto hochladen kann. Wichtig ist mir allerdings hauptsächlich, dass man erkennt, dass die Sparkasse nicht mehr existiert und dass ist ja mit dem Lebenszykllus auch gegeben.
Grüße
dsk1
VA00 (2022-07-05 14:19:50+00:00): Można to zamknąć? Zgadza się liczba i typ torowisk? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2328042
tomzyl (2022-07-05 14:25:44+00:00): Właściwie jest ok, choć render trochę się rozbiega. Sam układ torowy i rozjazdów jest poprawny.
Frans S (2022-06-28 10:21:22+00:00): Hi Juan.  I reviewed this changeset as well. Same issues. Not squared and inaccurate mapped.
If in the immediate vicinity the ground is not disturbed, it is usually not a building, at most a storage.
Best regards.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122930392
Dimitar155 (2022-06-28 11:58:48+00:00): The street is one way as of 01.05.2022. This changeset has been reverted in changeset/122954231.
luin132 (2022-06-28 20:24:58+00:00): Thank you!
Martin Borsje (2022-06-28 04:28:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Martin Borsje (2022-06-28 04:40:58+00:00): Randy,

Ik zag dat je de panden handmatig had gemapt; ik heb er een BAG-import van gemaakt.
Rom1 (2022-06-28 07:55:12+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu dans OSM. Également contributeur dans le Toulois, auriez-vous une source pour le nom attribué au lavoir ? Merci.
Gump54 (2022-06-28 17:41:36+00:00): Bonsoir, je chercherais une source officielle, mais j'habite à 20m de ce lavoir depuis 25 ans et c'est le nom que lui donne les habitants.
Gump54 (2022-06-28 20:36:02+00:00): information supplémentaire ce lavoir est encore en eau alimenté par une source
Rom1 (2022-06-29 11:54:25+00:00): Bonjour, c'est parfait. Il n'y a pas mieux que vous en tant qu'habitant pour connaître les lieux. J'ai précisé que de l'eau y coule et j'ai retiré les attributs non nécessaires https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182041040 OSM étant une base de données géographiques on ne met pas des addr: à tous les objets. Merci.
Rom1 (2022-06-28 08:04:15+00:00): S'agissant de cette fontaine, y-a-t-il de l'eau qui y coule où est-elle désormais seulement décorative ? Merci.
Gump54 (2022-06-28 17:43:33+00:00): non il n'y a plus d'eau et le bassin est utilisé en bac à fleur
Rom1 (2022-06-29 11:55:31+00:00): J'ai modifié les attributs pour qu'ils correspondent à a réalité. Merci.
elmoneto (2022-06-28 00:05:24+00:00): O uso de natural=geosite não é o mais adequado para geossítios que são construção humana, porém ainda não há tag específica para esse tipo de elemento. (Sugestões muito bem-vindas)
adrianojbr (2022-06-28 14:34:36+00:00): Khroix, mais uma dica:

Normalmente os edifícios tem cantos retos. Quando esse for o caso, após desenhá-los, use a ferramenta de ortogonalizá-los (botão direito na linha ou a tecla Q).
Abraço!
TheSwavu (2022-06-28 00:13:31+00:00): That should have been convert to no u-turn
literan (2022-06-28 17:30:02+00:00): не может быть такого названия у остановки. Яндекс подтверждает. Исправлю
os-emmer (2024-02-19 19:29:29+00:00): Hi pmfox,
you changed this building from amenity=fire_station to amenity=emergency_service. This tag is deprecated. What exactly is this object?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062898580
Andreas Hernandez (2026-05-21 12:21:33+00:00): Creo que es 66kv https://sig.energia.gob.ar/visor/visorsig.php
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
keithonearth (2024-10-01 20:46:39+00:00): I've noticed that people often don't do imports any closer to towns than this. Is it because it is too tough to get the import to work with the existing data when the existing data is pretty high density?
felipeeugenio (2022-06-28 22:11:13+00:00): Hola. Esto es una faena forestal o un condominio? saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122932660
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
Glassman (2022-06-28 23:27:20+00:00): The school district lists the school as TAF@Saghalie. Can you review your edit and update as needed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122932754
felipeeugenio (2022-06-28 22:09:43+00:00): hola. Si los caminos son para una faena agrícola o frestal, por favor usar highway=track y access=private
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122932806
b-unicycling (2022-10-21 11:05:50+00:00): Please don't use the year in the historic key, move it into start_date instead. The historic key is for categorizing the historic feature.
MxxCon (2022-06-28 04:40:29+00:00): Hello.
Satellite imagery shows that you placed this speed camera smack in the middle of somebody's driveway. Is this an accurate location of this camera?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122932890
TheSams (2022-06-28 04:54:26+00:00): Oopsie, my bad. I have updated the location to now be exact.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122932890