piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cats_pajamas (2020-06-26 22:14:24+00:00): Hello Pt873, while I was editing this area, I did not see a physical barrier and therefore added the connections. Upon further review, it looks like driving through these intersections is not possible. Thank you for changing these back to the correct modeling.

Automatic translation below:
Olá Pt873, enquanto eu estava editando esta área, não vi uma barreira física e, portanto, adicionei as conexões. Após uma análise mais aprofundada, parece que não é possível dirigir por esses cruzamentos. Obrigado por alterá-los novamente para a modelagem correta.
Nakaner (2020-06-25 07:58:43+00:00): Hallo,

wenn der Weg nur noch geschottert ist, wäre tracktype=grade2 oder tracktype=grade3 richtig. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype

Könntest du das bitte noch korrigieren?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87106687
elcoach85 (2020-06-25 22:49:39+00:00): Erledigt. Danke für den Hinweis.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87106687
HeyItsAdam (2020-06-26 04:20:34+00:00): You can't just delete map information because it is on private property. OpenStreetMap maps what is there in real life, not what is according to someone's interests, which you clearly did here
PierZen (2020-07-09 22:47:03+00:00): Martin, Il y a encore une clôture juste au nord du pont limitant l'accès vélo/piétons au pont. Il faut toujours faire le détour par la ville pour y accéder.
Martin868 (2020-07-09 22:54:38+00:00): Quel pont Pierre je suis mêlé ?
PierZen (2020-07-10 02:13:41+00:00): Pont Gouin à  Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu. J'ai segmenté la piste avec une section distincte passant dans un tunnel sous la structure béton du pont sur la bande du canal. J'ai aussi mis clé construction=highway, en attendant que travaux soient complétés. Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824705129
elf128 (2020-06-24 23:32:07+00:00): Went down the river in this area twice. Know the area.
abakus_uploader (2020-06-25 22:31:11+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2020-06-25 11:53:45+00:00): Gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend in OSM, maar via het forum vraag je om import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 11:55:56+00:00): Je hebt hier een gebouw in een gebouw getekend. Het bouwwerk van het winkelcentrum staat toch al op de kaart.
Verder geef je bij je uploads geen enkel commentaar. Graag in het vervolg doen.
Wellicht wilde je hier shop=mall toevoegen?  
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 11:58:16+00:00): Het gebouw op het gebouw heb ik verwijderd en omgezet in shop=mall
eggie (2020-06-25 12:15:35+00:00): Ik denk dat OsmInEdit 1.0.9 niet zo geschikt is voor dit soort bewerkingen.
Dat zou e.e.a. verklaren. 
Wat is dit voor een editor.. iets op een tablet?
Even geen ervaring mee. 
Wellicht beter gewoon op de computer met de standaard editor iD of nog beter met JOSM.
MVG,
Eggie
frasty (2021-07-13 21:22:20+00:00): Why this highway has been reclassified as a grade3 track? Surface is asphalt so it shoud be highway=unclassified
elcoach85 (2022-01-26 10:23:07+00:00): I was there in Feb 2019 with the road bike and it was bad gravel.
VitalieS (2020-06-28 02:16:55+00:00): ț, nu ţ. :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87107394
VitalieS (2020-06-28 02:17:32+00:00): ș, nu ş.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87107394
Dimacn (2020-06-25 04:22:36+00:00): Вы опять некорректно "исправляете" номера домов. Это здание нарисованное в OSM как одно, на самом деле имеет два номера - 5 и 5А. Пожалуйста уточняйте сначала что вы "исправляете".
Natalia18 (2020-06-25 07:00:24+00:00): Добрый день, спасибо за уточнение. Вы правы, в данном случае правка была неполной, теперь здания разделены.
Thomas8122 (2020-06-26 19:26:28+00:00): Bitte nicht mit einem profanen 'Aktualisiert' zahlreiche Adressen löschen. Habe dein Changeset tlw. rückgängig gemacht. Das nächste mal bitte mehr Vorsicht und keine Änderungen von Belgern bis Berbersdorf in einem Changeset. Viele Änderungen waren sicherlich sinnvoll und deshalb hab ich dieses Mal händisch korrigiert.  Gruß Thomas https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87209784
ZeLonewolf (2021-01-02 04:00:17+00:00): Hi, I noticed you have a number of imported parcels tagged protect_class=27.  This tag (protect_class=27) is barely used and isn't supported by any renderer.  Could these be tagged leisure=nature_reserve or protect_class=5 instead?
alester (2020-06-25 03:57:38+00:00): A proposed bike route probably shouldn't be on the map, and definitely not tagged as an active route. It might be best to wait until the route officially opens and signage goes up.
Bike Across Canada Route Network (2020-06-25 04:59:04+00:00): It's a chicken and egg problem. 

The route should not be physically signed until it's agreed upon by the community. Unlike how another (signed NCN which is not actually a National Cycling Route Network*) was built, here, we are using technology to make the proposed (not active, but usable) routing known - so then if people can think of better routing, this can be done long before signage is put up. The idea of 'proposed' is that there is no signage until it's agreed upon. This is why, when rendered it would show up as a dashed line - which can be changed where needed.   

Putting up signage on roads/paths without permission is simply vandalism, it's better to get the approval from users - once there are no objections on paper (digital) then it makes sense to seek permission from local governments to put up signage - not the other way around. 

*source
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2001276213451132/2722389021339844/?comment_id=2723083081270438
"Please remind people That we NEVER said it was a National Cycling Route Network, The Great Trail of Canada is a network of MULTI-USE trails which is NOT fully designed for self-supported cyclists for the entire network."
keithonearth (2020-08-08 02:13:55+00:00): I think developing these routes is a very useful thing, but I'm not convinced that OSM is the place to do it.

I see that you had been informed about potential issues with the approach you are taking previous to my message more recently (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88962380). I think it would be wise to stop adding these routes you are developing on facebook until there is more consensus about whether or not these recommended routes are appropriate for OSM. 

Keep up the hard work on ridewithgps, or similar sites like that. I'm sure lots of people will find it useful.
keithonearth (2020-08-08 02:15:56+00:00): Oh, and I think you misunderstood the comment about signage on the route. They weren't suggesting random individuals put up signage, which would be vandalism. But that appropriate organizations put up signage.
Bike Across Canada Route Network (2020-08-08 07:44:40+00:00): It seems to be only you who thinks it's not appropriate to add in the proposed Bike Across Canada Route Network to openstreetmap. 

The biggest reason why I can't get 'official proposal' status is that the TCT/TGT is actually in the way (i can't even get funding for it).   The irony is that it's (wrongly) shown on the map as a NCN.  So no municipality would even look at it because they (wrongly) assume that the TCT/TGT is a National Cycling Route (or whatever recreation is dominant for the segment in their area). 

Please consider allowing for this national project to be shown in OpenStreetMap because this is a great place to get public input on where the network should be exactly.    

It's clear that The Great Trail organization would certainly be happy to see this happen so less people would be disappointed when looking at it, they would see it for what it is. 
https://twitter.com/TheGreatTrail/status/1035192407883698182

P.S  Thank you for stating your objections now (6 weeks into it, rather than 6 months into it)   I don't have to mention the number of people who die cycling across Canada where there is no dedicated infrastructure in place.
keithonearth (2020-08-14 18:10:07+00:00): Our discussion about this has become spread out over a few changesets, in the interest of consolidating it, I'll only be commenting on this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88962380
alester (2020-06-25 03:58:49+00:00): Are you sure the old pathway is now designated for bikes as well? I thought it would be staying as pedestrian-only and the new one closer to Dallas Road (not yet mapped) would be for cyclists.
Bike Across Canada Route Network (2020-06-25 05:15:59+00:00): Correct, the section hasn't been explored since March (and there was no signage at the time).    I'll switch it over to foot designation as it was and have the routing on the road until surveyed again. 

You can see on the concept drawing that once mapped correctly, it will be a cycle track.
https://www.victoria.ca/EN/main/residents/transportation/cycling/dallas-rd.html
Kovirii (2021-03-02 04:19:17+00:00): The Office depot moved to where the movie theater used to be, on the other side of the mall.
user_5359 (2020-06-25 15:51:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your objects please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site
canfe (2022-06-12 06:53:50+00:00): Quando si modificano delle vie e queste incrociano delle ciclabili come a Venaria way 134109972 vanno aggiunti i punti di intersezione tra le due! Ho provveduto io.
julcnx (2022-12-30 15:10:02+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contributions. could you please explains in details the purpose of these "DVBD2020 enumeration"? Why does this description tag (e.g. description=5801021201) mean and why was it added to a new area instead of the actual village place area or node ?
julcnx (2023-02-08 15:06:15+00:00): FYI, without further response from your side, I have removed this contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87115139
eggie (2020-06-25 06:54:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Het is niet helemaal duidelijk wat je hebt toegevoegd. Wat was je bedoeling.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 07:15:18+00:00): Er missen inderdaad nog wat paden..  
Die zou je kunnen intekenen.
Gr eggie
Glassman (2020-06-26 22:06:54+00:00): Tip: building outlines should generally match the roof line. This one looks too big. Can you adjust it to the image?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87115622
user_10215874 (2020-07-09 05:04:06+00:00): oh no its Pichit
blackboxlogic (2021-03-18 16:29:04+00:00): The many no-u-turn restrictions inside a parking lot seem a little excessive. example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11239633
user_5359 (2020-06-25 15:49:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5526556638/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
L'imaginaire (2020-06-25 11:17:59+00:00): The road is tagged with access=destination, that's probably why the router avoids it. 
Tagging is consistent with Mapillary imagery that shows a C3 + "uitgezonderd plaatselijk verkeer" sign: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/eYlq2316_-XFAednWURT2Q (I can't find one on the other end of the road though)
user_5359 (2020-06-28 05:12:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If the are to two business inside a building: Please add to nodes inside the building and copy the business information to the nodes.
If you need help you are welcome.
seav (2020-09-30 20:14:46+00:00): Hi! It seems you accidentally changed a `place=town` tag into `place=Pampanga`, which is incorrect. I have now fixed this.
Nmxosm (2020-06-25 15:38:32+00:00): Hallo pierre38300,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

In deinem Änderungssatz hast du zu einigen Wegen mit highway=primary den Tag motor_vehicle=yes hinzugefügt.
Dieser ist laut Wiki (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions) der Standardwert und muss deshalb eigentlich nicht hinzugefügt werden.

Zum Überblick sind die folgenden Seiten sicher hilfreich:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei Fragen melde dich bitte einfach als Antwort hier, schreib unter https://forum.osm.org/ oder einer der zahlreichen Mailinglisten (z.B. http://lists.osm.org/mailman/listinfo/talk-de) oder erstelle eine Note (https://osm.org/note/new)

Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir erstmal weiterhelfen.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
DaxServer (2020-06-25 08:18:59+00:00): Hi. Can you please revert all of your "testing" edits? Thanks.

To test mapping, you can go to this link http://preview.ideditor.com/master/ and then click on the red colored "live" button at the bottom. After clicking, it will switch to "dev" mode. You can start testing in this mode.

For more info, please go to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing#Experiment_with_the_API_.28advanced.29
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87119779
Cascafico (2020-06-25 09:33:04+00:00): Hello and welcome in OSM!

Footways are mailnly for urban areas and paved: please consider path instead
Supaplex (2020-06-25 09:26:48+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87121911
Carto'Cité (2020-07-20 11:25:27+00:00): Salut Simon,
Il y a un doublon de cycleway ici jusqu'au rond point au sud est. J'ai enlevé le cycleway=lane pour laisser que le left. Dis moi si ce n'est pas ça
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
simon_geovelo (2020-07-20 12:54:54+00:00): C'était l'autre qu'il fallait gardé ;-)
J'ai corrigé. 
Le signalement original était celui ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2241208#map=16/49.0292/2.0932&layers=N
Carto'Cité (2020-07-20 14:39:24+00:00): oups désolé :D
Charles
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2020-08-07 21:40:25+00:00): Hallo Andi,
Dieser Änderungssatz hat die Relation R1 Sulmtalradweg beschädigt, indem 2 Ausläufer in Bergla bzw. Dietmanndorf hinzugekommen sind. Mein Versuch zu verstehen, wie es dazu kam, hat für den Ausläufer bei Bergla folgendes Ergebnis:
1) Wegsegment Oberhartstraße bis Weis-Lamplweg beim Bahnhof Bergla (510222534) gelöscht
2) Verbleibende Oberhardstraße verlängert, sodass sie den gelöschten Teil ersetzt
3) die Relation wieder „repariert“ indem die (gesamte) Oberhartstraße wieder hinzugefügt wurde
In diesem CS hast du mehrere Straßensegmente gelöscht und durch Neuzeichnungen ersetzt. Das ist sehr ungünstig und sollte unbedingt vermieden werden, da die Historie verloren geht. Dass damit auch Relationen beschädigt werden können, hab ich schon erwähnt.
Auch die Umbenennung des Weis-Lamplweges in „Radweg R1“ ist mir unverständlich, was hast du dir dabei gedacht? 
Falls etwas unklar ist, frage bitte. OSM ist komplex, man lernt nie aus.
LG Robert
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2020-08-15 08:04:40+00:00): Siehe auch: 
http://osm-talk-at.1116557.n5.nabble.com/Talk-at-CS-87122017-reparieren-oder-reverten-td3579.html
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2020-08-22 23:14:05+00:00): CS revertiert.
antoalvi (2020-06-25 07:24:44+00:00): Added Service Roads also.
mueschel (2020-06-28 10:14:45+00:00): Could you explain what this actually is? An entrance to a shop is not a cave entrance.
Perlover (2020-06-30 21:43:17+00:00): Hi,

This is stairs but i didn't find a stairs object so i tried this type more for fun ;)

Later in that day i changed the object type to right type i think.
Perlover (2020-06-30 21:47:19+00:00): I changed this POI to correct type from computer but i don't see my changes from phone at OSM site. I will see later that is there.
mueschel (2020-07-08 11:11:02+00:00): Please don't forget to check.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-10 11:00:00+00:00): (prompted by an IRC conversation following https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123421872 )
On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110265979 you've added "opening_hours:post_office=Mo-Su 06:00-23:00".  Does that not strike you as a teensy bit unlikely?  POL's branch finder page for it is https://www.postoffice.co.uk/branch-finder/3873498/bad-bargain-lane , but that also says "Please Note: Not all services are available outside of the dedicated Post Office operating hours. Please check with your local branch".  Unfortunately it doesn't say what the "dedicated Post Office operating hours" actually are. 
I'd expect that "opening_hours:post_office" should reflect "dedicated Post Office operating hours", not general shop opening hours (also opening_hours on a separate PO node).
SomeoneElse (2022-07-10 11:06:38+00:00): As an aside, a quick check of local POs in POL's branch finder finds the Sunday hours plausible (closed) 6/10 cases, maybe plausible (some daytime opening) in 2/10 and completely implausible in 2/10.
CjMalone (2022-07-10 12:21:08+00:00): This is a 2 and a half year old changeset... Considering I only really started mapping in 2019 I'm sure there are lots of bad edits from around this time. I would not have added "opening_hours:post_office" now adays. I tent to stay away from shop=* amenity=post_office combinations, unless "untangling" them.

The validation of POL branch data is interesting. I'm going to look at some ones close to me.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-24 13:54:38+00:00): Incidentally on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142594639 , from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87190442 , I moved the PO out to a separate node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9881914107 , but (from having a look around the last time I was in there) the opening hours look sensible.
CjMalone (2022-07-24 21:13:44+00:00): My local post office is is more complicated. It's one of the bigger ones, a real counter. PO website and pol data say Mo-Su 07:00-20:00. But the counter is signed "Main counter opening times Mo-Fr 08:30-17:30; Sa 08:30-14:30 if the main counter is not open, please use our serviced from the main retail point".

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1309359635
https://www.postoffice.co.uk/branch-finder/1229354/shanklin
https://osm.mathmos.net/postoffice/branch/1835

Also, that's not the correct coop opening hours, printed on the door is "Mo-Su 07:00-22:00", I did think they permanently changed from 23:00 to 22:00 semi recently. The coop website says "Mo-Su 07:00-23:00", but the Southern Coop website says "Mo-Su 07:00-22:00 Post Office services are available throughout this store's opening hours."

https://www.coop.co.uk/store-finder/PO37-7AA/42-regent-street
https://stores.thesouthernco-operative.co.uk/isle-of-wight/shanklin/42-regent-street.html

So, I guess, is the opening times for the counter, or for the service?
CjMalone (2022-07-24 21:25:21+00:00): And laughably, the PO website contradicts the PO sign and Southern Coop website by saying "Please Note: Not all services are available outside of the dedicated Post Office operating hours. Please check with your local branch."

I'm losing the will to live on this one, I'm going to ignore opening hours on post offices until there is a clear answer. I'll still use PO data to add addresses, add/remove POs in OSM (OS OpenMap Local helps too), and ref:pol_id.
opencarpatia (2020-12-20 02:15:32+00:00): Hello, why this part of the stream is marked as culvert? Have you been there? There is a bridge here. Currently it has only one lane & different surface & smoothness.
User6 - Lightcyphers (2020-12-27 18:27:36+00:00): Hello opencarpatia,
Thank you for the attention you pay to our commits. 
I do apologies if unintentionally this bridge was marked as a culvert. Probably, the image was not very comprehensible. 

Please inform us what other accurate sources are you using for editing, so we keep in mind in order to prevent future disagreements.
opencarpatia (2020-12-31 05:51:22+00:00): My source - is personal on site inspection. Please remove the culvert.
ftcat (2020-06-25 08:06:36+00:00): Hi SaikatM,

I wouldn't be too worried about mapping the riverbank of the Chobe/Cuando so precisely as what you see in the satellite imagery is only where the flowing water has kept the channel clear of floating reeds and vegetation, the actual river is far wider than this and will vary with the season and the prevailing wind and the age of the imagery, just compare different image providers and you will see what I mean. This applies to most the big rivers in this area, that flow through wetlands or flooded grasslands, the Zambezi, Kafue, Luapula, Chambeshi and Okavango will be similar.
eggie (2020-06-25 09:09:17+00:00): Dag Jelle.. In OSM Nederland taggen we tegenwoordig alle info op de adresnode. Dus niet op het gebouw zelf.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-25 09:13:14+00:00): Alle info heb ik naar de adresnode verplaatst
Gr eggie
jelle619 (2020-06-25 09:57:23+00:00): Mijn editor maakt daar amper onderscheid tussen, maar ik zal er proberen rekening mee te houden. Ik gok dat mijn editor het gebouw zelf genomen heeft omdat de naam van de locatie daar al op zat.
eggie (2020-06-25 10:34:13+00:00): Oke.... denk dat dit soort editors gewoon beperkt zijn. 
... en ook niet op de Nederlandse situatie toegesneden.
Was geen probleem om het over te zetten. Kwestie van kopieren. 😀
Gr eggie
aceman444 (2026-05-09 18:36:45+00:00): Aj ked zprovozneny, ale nie pre vsetky formy dopravy. mtb=designated tam uz bolo, takze nebola potrebna ziadna zmena.